HomeMy WebLinkAbout06.06.2006 PC AGENDA
r
r
r
-;~
:CJTY OF ~ ELSINORE
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
MICHAELO'NEAL, CJWRMAN . ,
JOHN~VJ~"
JlMMYF1.01tI.StC~,
,'-, "' ',-,..-'_ - - .',-':-,.,', .,.0;":..
ltOLBE~P~Z.i:;~TYDEVELOPMENTDIR.
WWW.LAXE-tLSINORE.ORG
,(951) ~n.3124 PlJoNE
(951) 67"'i3!J1 PAX
LAKE ltLSINou CULTURAL CENTER
183 NORTH ~ STREET
LAKE ELSINORE. CA 91530
******.*,*1t'If*****~*.******~******************************************
''fUESDAY~ JUDe 6th" 2006
6:00 P.M~
'l/Y9.u"rJHIAe"dblgthl4 Planning COlflmission Meeting ple.eplU'k in the Parkiitg
Lot tlcr,osstheItreBtfr,pn the Cultural Center. This willassiit u; in limiting the
, impac!PI.eetiaga till' the Downtown Business District. Thank you for your
coopertltlon/ . " ,
\',' .
..". .
l'~~C()MMF;N1~~ti~~ A~ENPIZ~Q ~T~MS -~ ~TES> ,'"
, (plea.seread & compl~J Speakerts Format the podi~pnor to the start of~the,
Planning Copnni~ionMeeting)
CO~~INT CA.ltE~~ .. , ' , '
(AU 'matters on'the .Conse~itCalendar are approved in one motiontunles~ a
Commissioner 'OI' any~rs of the public requests separate action on a specific
action.) ,
Ik.t,'
A>w:/.. ", n \
1.
RegularPl~i, CQIDmission Minutes of February.21 stt 2006
Regular:Ptam$gCommission ~~es of April 4th, 2006 '
2.'
:~,-"","
:-- -.-\ ;;-,':;, -.
. I
I
t
i
I
I
t
I
r
f
r
I"
(
k
~~/
~)
!41 -;:,
,-:"-;~M: ~''; , '-:':-: ~ - .*~it::i~',.; ,-
PAGE 2 - PLANNINGC(}MMISSION AGENDA- Jun." 6,2006
r 3. Regular Planning Commission, Minutes of May 16th, 2006
4. ~~J:)esjgn Review of a Single-Family R.esidence located at 1121 Mill
S~t{APN: 373.094~OO3) '~n ~
,.,' \lJ)) 0 ;}\Yw-'5J
· Theappt~t ~srequesting design review consideration for a conventionally
built;~gle-fami1y dwelling unit pursuant to Chapter 17.82 (Design Review),
~t7.14{ResidentialDevelopment Standarcls), chapter 17.23 (R-I single-
Ralnily'Residential District), and Chapter 17.66 (parking Requirements) of the
,Lake Elsinore MUnicipal Code (L:BMC)~ '
.r
,f',
CA.SEPLANNBR:
Justin Carlson, Asspciate Planner
Ext 295, jcarlsmt@lake-elsinore~org
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
5. ' MmorDesigriReview ofa Singte-FamilyResidence located at 12531 P~m
$tteet (.APN: 375-041-024) ~p 0 t}1)Olq-' 51.\
· '!'he ,applicant is requesting design review consideration for a convetltion~Uy
built raised foundation single-family dwelling unit pursuant to Chap~ei 11.82
, (De$ign Retlie'W:)jChapter 17.14 (Residential Deve1opmentStandards),(]$ptef
17.23(lt..} ,S#ig1~~Family Residential District), and Chapter 17.66 (Jtarkmg ,
Requir_ts} of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (Lm,{C), .
,.
'~SE PLANNER: ' Jus.tin Carlson, AssoCiate ~la.nne~ ...'...........
Ext.2.95, jcarls()n@lake-els~~Or'~:"
RECOMMENDATION:. . Approval
PUBLIC",~G'lm~~
(please read & complete, a Speaker's Form <at the Podium prior to .tl,1e start of~e
Planning Commission Meeting. The Chairman will call' on youtospeakwb,en y()ur
item is called:)
6.
( .
" '
use,P~rmit No. 2005-23 ~ Conunercial Design Review No. 100S-
.."n7 -:ELEVEN" Convenience Store and Gasoline Dispensing
t With onsiteBeer and Wine sales.. Located at the Northwest corner
and CoUi.:A.venues( s)~
~V'
.,.
',;:,: y, 'q
,,' /i{~' , c, '.' ""
; : ", ':, , :.. , , '.,'
",' .. ',' ' '::t'f,~~~j'r~ ......::.:<.';.;
'..; '.. ':-..,.' ',:' ,;:, "" "",;:' .
','~,:':>;, ":"",:" " l1~f;t~ '
;i~J;, . , ',:,'o., ':'r: :'. "",::' ";",:'
' ',:....:: :',:' . ' ",;'" 'Y',. :-"", ,',i".' ,,:
' , "'i'i '" " ,', '~. . :',"" :,: " "y:;"C'" ::~*?,;;;!::)::.."'.~ ....
., i , ". :';:''':" .... , ..
' , ""'''" " '.. ..' ,;.... , ",
" " V; ',' ':: '+: :' ::.: ';":"j'ii'f'? '
' '" ',;:i,; " , , ,.,"
' '" < ," , " e;,;'" "':';' .,',:;/, ';, '
' ':' '; .. :..,,~,., "',;::,:, ",:" , .... ". ,:"
' 0;:: '. , . " '" '. L .' , . , '"
' .'"" , '~;'~;::'" <:ii' :,".",,/ "/<'"
" ':;:;;~:'~;:';'.~:".'/;'; .'-': ;'::",'
:' <,' ",;, " ,
. . .< ,," ,. ""'''' . '.::'.. ,..:" .
: ' ',:: ;,;,;h. :,' : <;.;:'!. "\':": " , ,
' " ' ',",' ,'>, ::~,
' ",'" '" "" " " ',' ~'j',
.:..., . .
' . ...... ''''''':::C'''
,>}:<~ .., '.
'~~: ".~'~~~::' .
~,,-
'. ,.' ,'.;.
'.""'" , ,
' ....,: " '.'.
,:,....,.\/.., .
. .",'..,: ."" ", \'..
,":'. :'
'. ';':,
, ,..::,. ,'"
'. ".: ,','. "',
,','''' '. ",:
" . "'" " ':. .
'":'''':''' " '. .' .. .: , : . ,
' " :i. .::.....J,. :. . ',.., ""..: ;
, . ',: .:;: :' "'.' ''':''', ,,' "
:;.-.:
, .....
":.e",
.' " , :
:;'; ":: .', r, '" , : ,
'.:{: <.' ,; : v 'C>"': "::, \ ,<
. ....'" ,,"',' .', :' '.' ,
' ',..,,' < '-::'.' ",,;:"",, f'j',~\~'it:'< , .
," :..... . ".. " ., "". ...
'," , > ': "
",J.' : " 0:',: ~"""' ,:,: '.... ,,':.'
"":'A' . : :,
' '.', .:~ '. '. '.. .... '
;', '..... .'. '~:::;, .
" , :>:,"
.'.,2 ",
. '. ,"" "
.';:t:
.... , .'
. i '"
>~
..
J".
.. '-, ~.' f:;.,:
':-:?:"""c":'~'; ,
". .'.:f'c.""..
, . ",;" ." .
, ,'.' }',:,'" :
.;"C,i. , ' ' .
, "j '0,:,
' ',': '.::. ": : ':~
" :;.
..i/",,:: ,,'
;",:' " .':.
",:': ,.:.
' '.Y'.:','.," ,"< ";: ;"'" '
',<: I,. . ::'",.:," ,
, :':~:;" .,' <
:'
.'" "
, "
""." .
:.". .
. ,.,'
::;:
.' ',',
.,',
, .
,:'
'\:"",'
i'~~i~~~";' .
"
. ,
,"
"",;' '>'::;-
,
;.' . ",;!,',\
.
. ,.:
, . ,
" 'l
, . '" }'.','
c. ' :.'):':',
,
> '; ,.~"
. ,', .
",
.' ',"', . I.::' "':
; ,'.>,..., :""
'..::'.:,'.,::(
<' ;.,
, .' '.:
'::: ';(~;li<,
:;' ...
. .',." '. ..... '; ':.'~..':
,,::;.' ,\'. '" .... '. '.. '."J
. :, .." ,', ,,' .,::
' ,'.,....: .. ':, "';'. ".
:~:: ~,:.,; . :"
,": :" .,.j, " "
'., :~. ":" '.' . :',' '.' .
,(' :' :" :,:", " .
"':-' :,:. .:"
,.,::'I., ,. .". "
". "". ,
.: ;,
I. >,
~f
I,
. ~, "
~~.~
, ,><<:
':,;:.,:
. :-'c"" :.i'
.:/. ".'
" :::' '..":,: "
': '" i'>:;:',.'
:;:~'::',\ . .
, .;,i.,. "
. . '.:.' .
...' .'
. ,ire
(*.
r
PAGE j ..,. PL~QCOMMlSSlON AGENDA- JUJle6,2006
,
· The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to establish a "gasoline
dispensing' eSU1Q1.j~ent" and to allow onsite beer and wine sales. In ad<fition, a
Comtt1ercial JiesisnReview consideration is being requested for a 2,960 squar~
foot' "~eestore, a 3,096 square' foot canopy and associated
...... tS' relative to a gas station/mini-mart establiShment within the
Commercial (C-2) zoning district pursuant' to Chapters 17.74
. mal Use Penmts) 17.38 (Non-Residential Deve10pJnent Standards) and
esign Review) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC).
. '
o CASE PLANNER:
Matthew C. Harris, Senior Planner
Ext. .279 mharriS@Iake-elsinore.org
RECOMMBNDATION: Denial
, :fi
oo\.j~ . .
~
'. . Plan . Conformity. Determination for Capital Improvement Program
)1006-07 through 20 1 o~ 11.
· b1~ce withCalifornia Government Codes Sectiot;l65401, the. PI . '. ,8
Cotn.nUssiort is required to make a finding that Public Work's Project confutm.
to the take EIsin()re General Plan.
CASE PLANNER:
Ken Seumalo, Engineering Manager "
Ext. 244, kseumalo@lake-elsinore.Ol1g:,'
RECOMMENDATION:
INFO~nONAL'
STAFF CO~NT~
Approval
1', ADSR~T
~, ','"' '~'H .,....~"" , >:"'>
'.,. .'. :..
: :.;:' ..
c, ' :; c' >. '
...:'~><'. . ",;.,
. .;' . ,..:;'" '
,<'<::;/- :>
"", ' .. .- F; .::' .' .
',i" .:, _,: .' '. " ,,;" ,__k ..:> '.
c, ..:': " :' ;.. "ni:i'.-.~
:c:,;'- ' .': , ""';" ,
-';; --' -:", .. ' : ',c' ; .''''. ,;
,,::,;:;::;:\:0":' - ";.;
: . '- ~'. -' . .
. '. . .,.....::
, ' - " , :'
',:';' -' -".:," "
- "" - '::: ,,,' ..' ;. i,.-
,<;..'; ,..,,'.. ;'>i:-' ..,.,' ..",--; ..', -
, .:.-,;'" :. -, ".. .. .. ..
'i ",' : ,~:~,,: ,_ ' ei:-,; ,: :;; <;:"
" ", ': ;,;; "'" '- --;,]:.~:>~::;/ ;;:
.:: \ / '\:~;~"':'{ '\ !1'4/;;e ::'~ ,:' - ~;;::~'. - ',i, '
',_ __ :" ' ,'" , , /r;" c. ,.".,::,..>,.:--
",__,' ' "'; ;~' .- __;<' 'i '.'. " '0" ',; " ,,_..
, "" , ',: _ -' " , ' " ,":.' i~ ' " ' : . '
,/ ".:, "v'
. : '. - ~:'\..1 iv, '. :
.- " ' : ' : ,/':;' f.:, - , -. :,. '." ,'; " -, .
, " ,;', , ",'>. ,,;, ';, ,,", , ,; 'ii,:..
'," " ", " ;';, 'N ;;'--
, - d, -', ' -,- ; ,-;, ,
;" ,,) - ..,.:, ,-', .
_ ':.. ..' ;,F, ",,' ' ' ," " , ' " ' .. '
; .,", ': , ',;' ' .- ' " . ,,;" , , :
':,;,;" _; .'5"" '. , :
'., C ' , :,:, " " ,. '.
I' ,,,,:,,,::;0.;:: ,_ ,,' _::;> :C,:" , ,
" - ,.. .... '" " , ",,), .
, " . ":,{ 5 : _; ,." ",':' -. c_,
. ',' .~. :-:. ' 'j '''c,,:' ';'-,<.-" - , ", :'"' ",
" ,'-' , ,':. " ,,' ,,' ' ' ,
: .p." .: ; , '-;i::'..>' .' <'i~""';'::>
"" ,,_",'.:' ,,,, _ '" __ " . ,c.., . '. ... ,..:::r";L Li, /. .;:
..':' .' _.",'"," ,'ct. '- ,,' .', .J;..". j'.::"'<"-
..,'_" ,'., "-i" ' .' --"' ".,:, . -
. : :...',--;'t"; ',' ' "." "" ' .,; :::' ',: ','''':- ..:,.\ .
, ',", .. " ' ',C{ . ,:.c " :" ..,--,::,,:. ",;;"" ,..:;;~~~{\
, " ';' ,". \. . I: ' .' , ,,:,-,"', '-:.. :. ,
: ',: ,i'; __ __ i" . ' ;" '" ""..; -- " ,--' ii <-;" f ' ',:"'.',' "
, ,.',' , _ _,' __ _ ',", ''''. .~; .. "-t" "c' .,-,- ,
.; ""',' ' ~,-' :,,,,,,,., ',"<
: ., \:' ..' :.. \,:':,~, :~~;',:,'(\:~~ ";ir~I:,...; :.
. " ,\:. ' , . ..,,,.,; ....'.., .; .;~.' <;: . '. .' :. .
, _' ", __, w
. ,,' ',:"":' i .
, /:y .," __ ,',,',_ ,d' " ,
'":; \:.'", ''':1 : .,' ',.',,; ,.?,,,,': ~~ '~'z::~';';'r,;'> ."
, - - ' :;<'. , . ' c.' " ,
. .:-> '''",;,'' -' ',:';';, " - ., <..;. . - '- '- :;':., ,
" ":'- c'" '" .,', ::',. '. ,....,'
:Y~~"t'~'~ "'f/~( .'::? . .
'-.", :.'
.. .: ,:::~. ' ;
;,>,-;:'<$0":" ~ ~
" .../~
. :"\""
"
)
,.' <........, '..
.c .'
"
-;
.,
e :" "., .
,- . ..-...,
~.
~,',
I
f:.
::>
, ",;.'
. '
< .
. .' ':. C :::. c ..
.- ,':::"'" .,.' '.,'
'.,' ".'.:., ....
':: '.:: :g ',,"
. .::':'
,. '. '"
.: ".; :
.", '..'., ,.'
: "'.):'; ':":. ~:/'
.{ \' '.".' :,.' . .'. :..::..
'"
U1
, \'
.<::
. .,' ';, .
'.tro.>~~.,...~
/"'"
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
OTY OF LAKE ELSINORE
183 NORTH MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530
/"'"
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21,200
CALL TO ORDER:
6:06:34 PM Chairman O'Neal called the Regular
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
6:06:37 PM Community Development Director Preisen
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
GONZALES,
ABSENT:
Director Preisendanz, Deputy City
Om Planning Manager Massa-Lavitt,
IZ, Project Planner Miller and Office
1.
aO
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes for February 7,2006.
MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY LARIMER
AND PASSED WITH A VOTE OF 4-0 TO APPROVE
THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED.
/"'"
Agenda Item No. \
Page \ of ~~
PAGE 2 - PlANNING CDMMISSIONMINUfES -FEBRUARY 21, 2006
~
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
2. Tentative Parcel Map 33182; The applicant proposes to subdivide a 2.23 acre
parcel of land located at 32920 Kevin Place. into four (4) individual lots and
maintain a remainder lot undisturbed. for the purpose of simde-familv
residential development.
6:08:45 PM Chairman O'Neal closed the
t the project had been
isions to the parcel
6:07:57 PM Chairman O'Neal: opened the Public Hearing.
6:08:04 PM Community Development Director Preisend
continued several times by request of the applicant in
map. He requested the item to be continued off cale
MOVED BY LAPERE, SE
AND PASSED BY A VOT
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.3
CALENDAR.
3.
....,
irector Preisendanz provided an overview of the
t Planner Resendiz to review the project with the
6:09:32 PM Assis Resendiz provided an overview of the proposed project. He
noted that the proj been conditioned to provide a 25 foot right-of-way dedication
along Avenue 6, givi it a 105- foot wide lot. He further noted a secondary 5- foot side yard
<i
dedication along Cole Street which makes the lot 35- feet wide. He further noted that the lot
after dedication is substandard in width and length. He noted that added architectural design
elements in compliance with the residential design requirements. He stated that the
developer was not present.
6:12:11 PM Planning Commissioner LaPere agreed with Staff's recommendation.
Page
~
\
of ~~
"-'"
Agenda Item No.
PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSIONMINUfES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
,,--
6:12:42 PM Planning Commissioner Gonzales stated that the property was hard to find. He
clarified the purpose ofthe variance and addressed traffic concerns.
6:14:37 PM Planning Commissioner Larimer requested the design for the house.
6:14:40 PM Assistant Planner Resendiz noted that the applicant had not provided colored
elevations.
,,--
6:15:16 PM Community Development Director Preisendanz n
elevations, the project could not be reviewed completely.
MOVED BY GONZALES, SECONDED
CONTINUE VARIANCE NO. 2005-02
REVIEW FOR A NEW 1,681 SQU
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
STREET, ASSESSOR PARCEL NU
6:16:50 PM Chairman O'Neal closed
4. Tentative Parcel Map No. 33164
6:17:20 PM Chairman O'Neal opened the P
6:17:24 PM Communi
the project and re
questions.
reisendanz provided a brief overview of
. w it with the Commission and answer
noted e project had been continued to this meeting
vided an overview of the project location and zoning
6:19:06 PM
project.
oner Larimer stated that she had no problem with the
6:19:19 pM Plannin
divide the parcel.
issioner Gonzales requested clarification of the pattern used to
6: 19:28 PM Project Planner Coury noted that it had to do with parking and truck loading.
6:19:39 PM Planning Commissioner LaPere agreed with staff's recommendation.
6:20:40 PM Chairman O'Neal closed the Public Hearing.
,,--
Agenda Item No.
Page 3
\
of 4: ~
PAGE 4 - PLANNING CDMMISSION MINUTES -FEBRUARY 21, 2006
MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY GONZALES AND
PASSED BY A VOTE OF 4-0 TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO.
2006-13, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP NO. 33164
~
5. Canyon Hills Estates Annexation
z: This project is titled the
is limited to the action
ur City. undaries which includes a
Change or pre-zoning. This
s is an lication driven by the property
exation and we were required to process
. ssion. I would like to ask Kirt Coury to
estions and present this project to the
,....,
** The contents of the Planning Commission meeting of Febru
with the exception of Item No.5, which are verbatim.
6:20:45 PM Chairman O'Neal: I will remind the a
and General Plan Amendment, Annexation and
6:22:07 . Thank you Rolfe. Mr. Chairman, members of the
Co s for the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change,
Annexat larati . The project before you this evening, again, is limited
to just that. exation, only for a General Plan Amendment, and the zone
change for th here is not a development application being reviewed by the
City this evenin hear discussion and in the correspondence that was provided in
your packet, there erence to a tract map. With the pre-zoning for the project, we
required that the an cant submit a conceptual plan so that we could take a look at
conceptually how the project and/or the property may be developed. That, again, is
conceptual only and is not being reviewed this evening. There has been discussion, has been
correspondence a lot of it with relation to environmental concerns for that. I want to inform
the Commission that when that application does come forward, when it is reviewed by the
Commission, it will have to go through the same public hearing process, the same
notification and environmental analysis, an environmental review will have to be conducted
supporting technical studies and such will have to be provided for that document. So I
Agenda Item No. \
~ of ~~
Page
~
PAGE 5 - PLANNING CDMMISSION MINlITES -FEBRUARY 21 2006
,
r-
,.-..
wanted to emphasize that for the Commission, again, what you're looking at this evening is
for an Annexation and a corporate boundary change. There is not a development proposal
that is being presented to you this evening. With that, I handed to you this evening
correspondence that came in regarding the project, it's a packet that I provided to you (each
of the Commissioners) based on correspondence that was received by the City as of late
Friday, yesterday and as of today. Rather than go through a detailed presentation 'based on
the staff report, I think that there may be pertinent information that I'd like to go through
with the Commission, specifically with relation to that handout I provided to you. I
numbered the pages down in the bottom right hand comer so e ould have them for
reference. Beginning on page 18, there is an 11- page letter senti ally talks about the
project and provides comments to the initial study and declaration. So if the
Commission would bear with me, I would like to go thr some of the, what I
thought to be relevant information within that doc lear some of the
concerns or issues, and then I would like to go b d again to the
project. So, again, beginning on page 18, the , where is
says, "It would seem that the City of Lake lsin istake or mi culation by
introducing the project map." I'm starting with 0 0 ack and give background
information to that. Rolfe and I ha a meeting with entatives from the Wildomar
group. We did pass out that concep and there is t map reference number to
that, so that is where a lot of this basis this inform generated from. That,
again, is not part of this application, so t e out t nvironmental document if
there is reference why that should or shou ed to it in the environmental
document, it is because ot a devel nt pack or proposal before you for that
application at this ti , for the a ience as well as the Commission, when that
comes forward, th through th e noticing process. On page 19, there's
beginning the fourth p forgive s I go through this, I just received this
today so I'm . to hI ommission so that we can go through the
informati was dlS lon, and again the fourth paragraph, that the
ildomar group was not informed in the initial study as
age two of that distribution there was the Wildomar
11 as ma from the WIN group was part of that distribution.
eive notification of the project. The fifth paragraph where it
t allow the full 30 day comment period, ironically, the project
cing requirement. We noticed it for 30 days, so in a sense, there
on the required noticing period. So it was required a 20 day, we
actually did a 30 d so there was, again, adequate time for the noticing of the project.
There's talk in the last paragraph about the Commission not having adequate time to review.
For information for the audience and I'm echoing this to the Commission as you're aware.
The Planning Commission for this particular project is a recommending body to the City
Council. Based on the Negative Declaration, the Annexation, the General Plan Amendment
and the Zone Change. All of those will take final action at the City Council, so this project
being noticed, this project being present to the Planning Commission is all part of that larger
scale process in which this project will have to go through. Continue will have go through to
Agenda Item No. \
Page 5 of ~1
~
PAGE 6 - PLANNING COMMISSIONMINlITES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
City Council and onward to LAFCO for their review as well, but I wanted to make that clear
to the audience that the Planning Commission is the recommending body to the City Council
for these applications. On page 20, about half way down the page, where it says page 17,
figure 2.5 proposed pre-zoning, the numbers that are referenced for rural mountainous,
there's also rural residential which is half acre, I'm sorry 5 acre, and those are consistent with
the City's General Plan that we have that was dated back to 1990. On page 21, there is
reference that in the form J, initial study checklist, that for the noise section that a check was
placed for significant impact box was checked, that was an error. of this process is that
we go through this when we review the environmental docume e ok for those errors;
we screen it as best we can, so we have noted that, we will at correction again before
the document goes on City Council for their final review. I quick for that, that is
correct. This is only Annexation, General Plan Amen ge. There is not a
development project, so that box is correct. On pag where it starts as
4.0 determination of the effect. This is the part th ld come back
for, the background information. It reference ary 27th.
That letter was submitted to the City Clerk's 0 est for info tion for the
project. On February 2nd, Rolfe and I met with entatives from the Wildomar
group. There was no mention to us that meeting . s request for information was
submitted to the City Clerk's office. ere there wa sion from the City Clerk
because this was a General Plan Amen Change, Clerk assumed that and
it had a 2005 reference number, the City that t was reviewed by the City
Council at some point in 2005. In rese e could not find that, so he
submitted a letter back 'ldomar gro ce, Mr. Rick Estes, stating that
he needed additional . e to r h the reco . When e City Clerk approached me about
the project, I info that I ad not gone City Council, in fact, it had not gone to
the Planning CommissI this' t and that i uld have to go through that process. So,
hopefully that ld cle sion with relation to that portion of this
document ther additI time which was going to go beyond the
enVlro e request for information again, I gave you that
bac he environmental document, which what this was
partm y onm al document was sent to the writer of this letter. They
reference p ental document, so we know that they did receive it, so there
was sufficient 0 respond and comment to the environmental portion of that
document, whic w is under the CEQA law, gives you that 20 day window in
which to respond. eral instances throughout the document, for example on page 25,
about the fourth or fi line down where it begins with form J, page 9 and 10, it references a
question in the second sentence, what attachment. That attachment is the environmental
impact analysis, which is provided along with the initial study and the checklist to give a
detailed response to those comments and checked boxes for no impact. So as you'll read
throughout the letter or throughout the document that that does refer to what attachment, it is
referring to that document. So, I want to make clear that for the Planning Commission as
well. Lastly, as part of background with reference to that February 2nd Planning Commission
meeting that Rolfe and I had with two representatives from the Wildomargroup, there's
\
of 4~
Agenda Item No.
b
Page
"wIIfI
.....,
.....,
PAGE 7 - PLANNING CDMMISSION MINl1IES -FEBRUARY 21, 2006
".-...
~
reference to my comments or statement within that meeting. There was discussion about the
tract map, in fact Rolfe and I reviewed the project in terms of the annexation with the
representatives. We, then shared a copy of the tract map, again for conceptual plan purposes
to explain and show to them how the developer was looking to possibly develop or
conceptually develop the property. We provided the representatives with a copy of that map.
However, there's a little bit of confusion within that meeting in terms of what statements
were relating to that project or statements that were relating to the project that's before you
this evening. So I wanted to make clear that we did provide a cop):: hat conceptual plan to
the group. We provided it for a courtesy level review for their i n based on some of
the questions that were raised during that meeting, but ag . did inform them it that
would have to go through a separate review, that enviro t sis would have to be
performed on that portion at that future date when tha r t c ard. And last but
not least, I wanted to make reference to that doc s on pa that I was just
referring to. It's dated as of January 20t\ the Ie starts out, however eceived it this
morning. I think that it was just an error on t in te s of writing t r because
their header within the letter clearly identifies eb 20th again I w to give that
as background information, and provide this to the P Commission for your review. I
know a lot of this was last minute inn ation that cam ore you, so I wanted to let you
know that staff has reviewed the lett have taken 1 information, we appreciate
some of the comments with relation t eaning if 1, we will make those
corrections. With that, I know that there Ie in audience this evening that
would like to make comment. The applic s evening as well. He would
be happy to answer que the Co n may h . Staff, again, has reviewed the
project in detail and r provaloft project as presented before you this evening
and if there's any Commissi m have, staff would be happy to answer
as well.
.ck Goacher? Is that the gentleman?
6:35:
I would like to state to you and everybody else in the
comments to three minutes.
.---.'
. Absolutely, I'll be even briefer than that. My name is Rick
Goacher with RGP . ng and Development Services in Irvine. This evening we are
bringing one of our clients before you, Trumark Companies, they are headquartered in
Danville. Mr. Chairman and members of the Commission, this is one of their first projects in
Southern California that they intend to go forward with. But as was already mentioned by
you and others, this is a very narrow hearing this evening and it's not for the project itself.
We've enjoyed working with staff for the last year in bringing it this far along, but we're not
going to be able to actually give you the drawings this evening. We do thank staff for the
tremendous work that they've put in and the City Attorney's office for the past year and I
Agenda Item No. \
Page 1 of U ~
PAGE 8 - PLANNING CDMMISSION MINl.ITES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
think it's been very very productive to have their involvement and their guidance so far. This
evening, speaking of behalf of this application will be two people representing both our
office and the applicant's office. Those individuals are Jeremy Krout and Vicki Mota. Vicki
is with Trumark Homes and I believe that she would like to start first. But prior to that I
would request, Mr. Chairman that if it's appropriate and if time permits we may wish to
provide a comment at the end in rebuttal to statements that may be made.
6:37:42 PM Chairman O'Neal: I'm not certain that we're going to
6:37:42 PM Mr. Goacher: Very good sir.
6:37:45 PM Chairman O'Neal: There is a significant n
speak on this particular item, so if you wouldn't min
6:37:51 PM Mr. Goacher: At this time we'd lik
Trumark communities.
om
ers of the commission. I am
located in Lake Forest. As
ty's boundary to annex
Cany' Hills Estates into the City
d closely with City staff and
regulati and the General Plan Update. I
k and professionalism during this process.
f these sites is one of the first steps of a
IOn of the site plan; however this is not
to work with the City and the community
in tlie ing months. This is part of Trumark's core
siness for over 13 years and I am on my 14th year.
aintained a solid core ideology that focuses on
consens g q ty projects that fit within the community. Trumark is
representin wners of the 246 acres and they are here this evening. Both
property own heir property and have been a part of the community for well
over 20 years. property owners and members of the community, they want to
see sensible co design on their properties that will benefit the surrounding
community that the ve been a part of for so long. For Canyon Hills Estates, the property
owner's interest formed the principles behind the conceptual design of Canyon Hills Estates
community and is the reason for annexing into the City of Lake Elsinore. The City requires a
tract map to be submitted with the annexation applications. The plans submitted represent a
conceptual design of Canyon Hills Estates community. Weare still in the design phases and
want to receive community input. We expect this to occur during the coming months, as well
as the environmental review. There will many opportunities for community input during this
time. Jeremy Krout from RGP Planning and Development Services, and Trumark's
Agenda Item No. \
of \.). ~
Page
'i
~
'wI1'
......."
PAGE 9 - PLANNING CDMMISSION MINUTES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
,--...
entitlement consultant will be discussing the boundary change being considered this evening.
Thank you.
6:40:49 PM Chairman O'Neal: I'm sorry, I don't remember you name.
6:40:56 PM Jeremy Krout: If you don't mind I'm just going to just grab an easel over a little
bit closer for reviewing. Thank you Vicki. Good evening Mr. Chairman and
Commissioners. At risk of sounding like a parrot, I just want to als City staff for their
time and effort to fairly and thoroughly and professionally anal): e p ~ect before you, the
Canyon Hills Estates annexation proposal. As Vicki mentio e 246-acre project site is
located immediately south of the City of Lake Elsinore's n Hills boundary. On
this line, (pointing to the exhibit lioard) in this grad now built out, it's
mostly, is approximately where the boundary the ci . ted boundary as
well as the Canyon Hills boundary. Surrounding er of uses that
are on the ground today and are planned pro ery soon.
You have about four, single family residentia e 's about four six, four to
eight units per acre just north of the site, as well as ju the street on Canyon Hills and
Cottonwood Canyon, you have, you w 15 to 24 dwe its per acre being planned on
that, on sites adjacent to the, the Canyo and Cotton intersection. To the south,
west and east of the site you, you have a rural resi and uses and, and in the
,--.. City's General Plan this reflects that this .ously in the City's sphere and it
included these areas as rural residential or . dential and mountainous land
uses. These designati also ass in the's General Plan EIR that was
prepared back in 199 d by the fo er City Council of Lake Elsinore. Access to
the site is mainly , Navajo Sp Road, as well as Cottonwood Canyon
Road via Canyon Hill oing to ju itch the presentation (inaudible). This
may be easy t; least t 's boundaries, but as you see here, again, is
the City b wood on coming on the east side of the site, looped,
kind 0 ills Road with Lost Road on the western edge of the
pro ints and the improved roads providing services or
access t t t graphy will exist between just south of this property
boundary 0 Is boundary and really is what separates our site from the core
of the Wildo is is a, it's easy to see on the, the aerial photo, but it's, it's a,
it's kind of diffic stance but, really the majority of the topography occurs here and
separates the Wild ommunities core from this, from this site. The majority of the
flatter area, the mor evel areas are north of the site that abuts Canyon Hills. For these
reasons, the topography for the circulation and those reasons, it's really the, the reason why
our proposal is to annex into the City of Lake Elsinore. This, this was probably the basis also
behind the City's planned, or plan area for the, the proposed General Plan update. Our site,
as well as sites to the east of our site, are planned to be in the City's General Plan area.
Consistent with this General Plan, the Proposed General Plan, in September 2005, Trumark
Companies filed a LAFCO, filed with LAFCO, a Notice of Intent to circulate a petition to
",.......
Page
C\,.
\
of ~l
Agenda Item No.
PAGE 10 - PLANNING CX)MMISSION MINUfES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
annex into the City of Lake Elsinore. This was filed, as I said, back in September, with
LAFCO and is on record with them.
...,
6:45:19 PM Chairman O'Neal: I need to keep you on the three-minute time.
6:45:27 PM Jeremy Krout: Oh, okay. Understand. I'll very quickly move this. The
proposed pre-zoning is Specific Plan and it requires that a Specific Plan review be conducted
prior to approval of any development. Trumark Companies met . Wildomar community
and discussed the project. We asked that we discuss th ~e, in particular the
development once the community, once we get to that level. u've heard several times
and I'm sure you are very aware, tonight's agenda item is d to the, the boundary
change and was in the, the property boundary was in e reviously and still
remains in the General Plan. With all due re community, the
landowners have a desire to be in the City of L community of
Wildomar and approval of the boundary ch 'bring the
property owned for decades by people considere s as part of community
and bring that property into the City and we ate any consideration by this
Commission, as well as the landowner e here as well.
y more of those kind of
No nt of order. I'm going to
ur name and address for the
~
a dress 31906 Gruwell Street, Wildomar.
of land development and review of
was last month when I came down here to
Lake nore's had a pretty poor history and installing
to move the trail off Grand Avenue to the south side of
ing tract with sidewalks and no room for a trail. So
ad to al with the County on several issues. Tomorrow we're
the County and we're going over plans. I was in the Planning
p. I looked at the set of plans for the whole development, I
saw the things. This is not just limited to this parcel. I've seen
I the plans on this whole project, and how our WIN committee for
incorporation learned out this was through me. Not one thing ever came from Elsinore that
we received. Thank you.
6:48:11 PM Chairman O'Neal: Thank you Mr. Andre. Next person up is Gina Castinon. I'm
sorry if! did not pronounce your name correctly.
6:48:26 PM Gina Castinon: Good evening. My name is Gina Castinon. I live at 32555
McVicker Street in Wildomar. I have two letters that I'd like to submit tonight with copies
Agenda Item No. \
Page \ 0 of "-\ b
'w1If
PAGE 11 - PLANNING CDMMISSION MINUTES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
~
for all the Commissioners in regards to the Canyon Hills Estates. Not to disagree with Gary,
but some of the WIN committee and the chamber were at the scoping meeting in December
and we brought our concerns to that meeting at that time. Rolfe at the time had stated, and
other persons on the board, that it was just an oversight, that this annexation, this sphere of
influence, was not going forward, it was an oversight and what we did was actually put
Elsinore on notice that the WIN committee was aware of the plans and we would be actively
involved in fighting it. Here are the letters. One of, one of my suggestions tonight would be
your recommendation would be to deny this sphere of influenc t, and an annexation.
What's going to happen if you approve it and it goes to City Cl, you know, thenof
course we'll ask the City Council to deny it as well. And just going to extend the
process and what you can do is stop it here now beca continue aggressively
fighting it. It will go before LAFCO. I'm assuming L .t since we have our
application in for city hood. We're going to ele ' a waste of the
taxpayer's time and money and the applicant's. S
6:50:16 PM Chairman O'Neal: If you do have oc
to the clerk over here. Thank you. Diane Falconer.
Arrow, Wildomar, and the
.lboxes. My concern is
and the 15 Freeway is a
, it's going to get, to get even
r that g hiz, there's a better way to get,
tever this, this proposed development, and
. ghbors, have paid a fortune to maintain
add a lot of other traffic going up these
ed Arrow. You'll be adding a lot more
one, an , and my few neighbors are the ones that are
concerned about this. Thank you.
",-..
you Mrs. Falconer. Next person would be, next
Sencer, or Spencer, sorry. Barbara Spencer, that be correct?
,,-..
6:51:59 PM Spenc vening Commissioners. I'm speaking to you tonight on behalf
of the Menifee Val orical Association. Ours is a public non-profit corporation whose
purpose is to identif preserve and promote the historical legacy of Menifee Valley. To
promote respect for our past and to educate the public about our historical significance.
Comments that followed were discussed at our regular meeting February 18 adopted by
resolution of the board, and directed to be presented to you by me at this meeting tonight.
Menifee Valley got it's name from mining development beginning in 1880. With discovery
and claiming of the Menifee quartz load by miner Luther Menifee Wilson. Farming activity
beginning in the mid-1800s was concentrated on the valley plane, however, the hills
surrounding that valley floor provided access to minerals such as gold, silica, pink quartz and
\
\ \ of "-\~
Agenda Item No.
Page
/
PAGE 12 - PLANNING CDMMISSION MINlITES -FEBRUARY 21, 2006
feldspar. Menifee Wilson worked the Menifee quartz load that extended eastward from the
area near Menifee Valley present-day intersection of Gary and Holland Roads, as well as a
number of other mines, which led to formation of the Menifee Gold Mining District. More
than half a dozen mines are listed within the district and Menifee Wilson himself was
involved in at least three, the Ken Wilson, Menifee Wilson's concave, and Briggs (inaudible)
which was found on the USGS maps at, as late as 1973. The range of hills with significant
rock crops, cropping on the western boundary of Menifee Valley, the very eastern segment
apparently proposed for annexation in, in this matter, is locatio several other mines
including the Mary Allen and the Florence. It's really difficult t te 'ne exactly what the
boundaries of this proposed annexation are because there ar treet names but from our
familiarity with the local geography and topography, we b exation in, intends to
extend at least eastward to Buyers, perhaps further to G e the case, it would
include not only the entire hill range of the mines, b ance to the most
famous of Menifee Wilson's mines. We see e received on
February 13, to indicate that annexation of the . ee Valley
boundary is required, or is even contemplatea to evelopment the Canyon
Hills project. In fact, for Lake Elsinore to have to p ltIes, services and circulation
to that area, would require it to cro a very deep rav out 60 feet at least. And, to
eliminate the significant rock outcro where there ieve remain palings. The
Menifee Valley Historical Association requests t"very area that provided
source for its name be preserved to Meni r th exed into Lake Elsinore.
Thank you.
'ng Commi ners. I'm Cheryl Aide. I'm Chair of the
on the Wildomar Incorporation Committee.
t confused. This is.
6:55:
e your address please?
6:55:43 PM Cheryl Ai : It's on my slip. This is more than housekeeping and the question is
not if staff reviewed this but did the Planning Commission review all the comments? I hope
that you will read my letter and pay careful attention especially to 3.9, Land Use. There's a
few other topics in there that are essential that you understand what you're doing as well.
Your current sphere is twice as large as your current city boundaries. We did have informal
discussion with Trumark last Thursday at our land development review but it was more about
the annexation than the project itself. Annex, the meaning of annex, take as one's own
appropriate. Impact, a striking of one thing against another, collision, a forceful or dramatic
Agenda Item No. \
Page \ ~ of ~ ~
".."
......"
'-"
PAGE 13 - PLANNING ffiMMISSIONMINUTES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
r"'
effect. Annex is followed in the dictionary by the word annihilate. Sphere of influence by its
very definition belies your claim of no impact. The act of placing a sphere is an impact in
and of itself because all actions will now revolve around that designation. The destiny of the
land, its environs, the people who live here, are forever altered by this act. No impact.
Hardly. You could see all these people here tonight, the impact's already started. All that
remains after the sphere is in place are the effects, annihilation, complete destruction. Of
what, you might say. The community's boundaries. Wildomar. This is an act of destruction.
No impact. You are pre-supposing your sphere somehow sup des our community's
established boundaries. In other words, the future planning precedence over a
community established in 1898. Law. Higher power th onfines of the local or
regional politics to which you are accustomed. Intent of t at is looked at to make
a determination and can be the deciding factor in a en considering the
annexation proposal, both the City and LAFCO ediate to the
future impact of the total project on city service .storic growth
trends, the city center, and neighboring comm not occur
in a vacuum. The land's interrelationship with t world and community
changes that could occur as a result of annexation sho onsiaered. In other words, your
actions have consequences. Think efully about w ou are being asked to tread.
Thank you.
/"" 6:58:23 PM Chairman O'Neal: William
The next person up will be Harv Diestrum.
6:59:15 PM William Z
brought to Mr. Co .
6:59:26 illiam Zeidlik, Z-E-I-D-L-I-K. I live at 33250 Sunset
Ave g you within a quarter of a mile. I gave Mr. Coury
a copy 0 ho ou have it. I'm recommending you read it thoroughly.
I'm going lay this hearing until some time or other because we have 30
days left to, d r. Coury says, to receive written responses to all of our letters.
CEQA calls for cated we had 30 days to, to comply. He scheduled this meeting
one day after the de was have supposed to occurred. I don't know how he could have
answered any of thes comments other than he must have specially looked at some of them
briefly in the last few days, because there's a lot more that I know coming in, plus this. I've
started a 50-page report, going through all hundred pages of the documentation I received.
Now the problem is, there's a total confusion. I missed the opening statements this morning,
or this afternoon, excuse me, and I was going to just read to you something that came to me
from the Public Policy Institute's poll which recently said that eight out of ten Californians
would like to see their local governments work together and come up with an agreeable
~ regional plan. Also, the same report says that 73 percent of the local people, electorate,
Agenda Item No. \
Page \':> of ~ 1>
/
PAGE 14 - PLANNING CDMMISSIONMINUTES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
would like to have the decision made by them in a voting process and only 23 percent prefer
to listen to their governing bodies. I think you have that here tonight. You have your
neighbors; look over the fence more often because we're affected by this. Cottonwood
Canyon comes out on Sunset Road at Bundy Canyon. It's a dirt road for three miles. It is
not going to be improved by any of this annexation nor anyone else. It's going to be
improved and we have the project 40, 1,500 homes at one spot and 4,500 homes total in that
area planning to use Cottonwood Canyon. Talk to TUMF or talk to Western Regional COG,
or talk to your, our transportation, which you were referred to by. Coury, twice before,
and you contacted our parks once before and got erroneous info Ion. I don't know where
in the County this particular information went. We can't fin erson you sent it to in the
County. I think what happens, you need to contact us, yo e there. LAFCO knew
we were there, LAFCO has issued us specifically not t Wildo pecific boundaries,
which we are right now underway of doing a I :~s ou interrupt the
boundaries of them, you're planning on, by a ding to errupting our
boundaries. Barbara just spoke to the fact that bblin a, at least
we think you are. That's what the confusion is. throughout s particular
report, or reports, or comments, or whatever, the rred to Cottonwood Estates.
Cottonwood Canyon Estates, or Cot nwood Canyon opment or specific plans. It
doesn't say this here annexation for r annexation ses. It doesn't answer the
questions in which you have gone to .th. L t October informed us
briefly. ..
7:02:47 PM Mr. Zei
by the gentleman here
ak a little more time since I got delayed
7:02:57 PM Mr.
your CEQA law, it is not proper.
7:03:06 PM Mr. Zeidlik: Read your documents please. Thank you.
7:03:09 PM Chairman O'Neal: Harv Diestrum. The next one up is Harv Diestrum.
7:03:18 PM Harv Diestrum: Commissioners, My name is Harv Diestrum. My address is
34860 Western Way in Wildomar. It's been impressed upon us repeatedly tonight that this is
Agenda Item No. \
Page \ ~ of ~ ~
"wtIfII
"""'"
.....,
PAGE 15 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
/"'"
only an annexation, a GP A Amendment, a Zone Change, and a Negative Declaration. I, I
believe that's what the, what the whole problem is, the annexation. Frankly, in the, I'm
shocked that our neighbors in the City of Lake Elsinore would entice the Trumark
Companies to annex the site to the City of Lake Elsinore. City officials have known for
some time that the future city of Wildomar has filed for incorporation. Is this how we begin
our relationship as neighbor cities? Our boundaries have been set for many years. The
boundaries are part of that incorporation application. Please explain why you have chosen to
ignore that fact. Regarding the proposed development, Wildomar ld be proud to have a
development like this within its boundaries. I would like to a k Companies why
they never came to Riverside County and the future city 0 omar with this proposal.
Was this simply a mistake, or were you misled by entities ity of Lake Elsinore or
elsewhere? I for one would support such a developm t ar. Most of us in
Wildomar are happy to see high-quality devel6pmen es, we have high
standards, but we are not anti-growth. I ask the ission to stop
this aggravating confrontation right now. I as ildomar
and Riverside County regarding building in them to our
beautiful city ofWildomar. Thank you.
",-...
7:04:57 PM Chairman O'Neal: Thank
",-...
t 33160 Roberts Street in
rs., Ms. Elexon(?) is going
it's i rtant otherwise you're not going
the City of Lake Elsinore on the 25th of
t one of the reasons there has been some
at there was anger about the way that this
you why some of that anger has come out
truth, pe get mad, and that's what's happened tonight.
I sent an email to the City in, on the 25th of November
about as clear I think as you can get, down there
does e City of Lake Elsinore plan to request to change its
its boundaries with the community of Wildomar? Does the
e any map showing proposed boundary changes between
you've got to keep in mind that Ms. Castinon had just, she told
ing and told that the maps were a mistake. The second letter that
Agenda Item No.
Page
\5
of
Chairman, ellow members of the Lake Elsinore City
lannigan. iv in Canyon Lake, 24140 Cruise Circle
ottonwood yon Road for more than 25 years. My
right after our new year's celebration and
life. had that property a long time as I've pointed
. sed by all the conversation tonight because in that 25
m anybody down there, not when the creeks rose or
drou t, but, it's nice to see a lot of interest here tonight. The
I have here a, a letter that goes back at May of 1998 when the,
oking for zoning in that area and they had us meet up at Calle
01 up in the Menifee area. And, what they did is they talked
I thought to have this map, but this is a map from the Riverside
County Planning Co ission, Mr. Joff, Joffrey is it, yes. And, we're a little finger that
sticks out, way over on this far end, and there's, but you'll see this dark line, I have 80 acres,
and that 80 acres is in the Menifee area. I purchased that land from Mr. Barrens, good friend
of mine, and he has an additional 80 acres next to me. It's also in the Menifee/Sun City
sphere of influence or planning. That's what that meeting was about back there and I'm a,
I'm a little surprised that, that point wasn't made. But, that's really all I have. I'd like to
thank you for allowing me to speak and the only other comment I would make. I was there
today working doing some pick and shovel work, and what a beautiful community it is in the,
Agenda Item No. \
Page \ 6 of ~ 1 ....,
PAGE 16 - PLANNING COMMISSION :MINUTES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
would have to give direction on such an action, so she's telling me that there's nothing going
on, don't worry about it. The City Council will have to deal with this kind of thing anyway.
They'd make the decision. The last thing that you have is the receipt from Trumark, from
Vicki Mata, dated October 12th, and in that there you see that they have paid the City of Lake
Elsinore $36,500 and one of them is for a tentative parcel tract map. $13,500 and there's a
$4,500 figure off to the right for a total of thirty-six five. I would correct Mr. Coury, there
isn't the word tentative, there isn't any kind of suggestion on the map that says it's a tentative
tract map. It was started at least two months before this was ev ade public. One last
comment, when I went to the water company, the description given to the water
company with their will-serve letter, which I got a copy of, t map and then it gives
the number of the tract map. I requested a copy and Lis t me a copy of all of
your General Plan amendment committee hearings. 0 e exception of one
which she didn't have, and I believe that was meeti . There 't one mention of
any of this project throughout all of those, those eral Plan advisory c 'ttee meetings.
That's the minutes. There was mention of a 10 ers. d there was a alk about
other Specific Plans and other information. So, e ere is that own City
Council didn't know and they were putting out bad 1 tion. The public spokesman for
the city was putting out bad informal' while that was on, money was being paid to
the City of Lake Elsinore and the tra got underwa d that, that's it. I've, I've
submitted other written comments. Th much.
'-'
.....,
PAGE 17 - PLANNING CDMMISSIONMINUTES -FEBRUARY 21, 2006
/"'"'
I knew the Christensen family, when you see the schools and you see what the Pardee people
have built, the parks and the, the, it's a beautiful thing to see. I have 25 homes looking down
across my fence and I went there in 1976, you couldn't see a light all the way to Railroad
Canyon Road. There wasn't anything around. Just, just a lot of beautiful land. Those days
are gone and I'm, I'm addressing that. I have 25, two-story bedroom homes looking over my
fence at me right now and when I see change, and change is coming, I would say this, this is
quality community, I'd like to see my land look like the land that's coming in around me.
Thank you very much.
/'"'
7: 12:26 PM Chairman O'Neal: Thank you sir. The next sp
that be correct?
7:12:42 PM Gino Gramatico:
7:12:47 PM Chairman O'Neal: Would you plea
7:14:51 PM Chairman O'Neal: Thank you. I appreciate your zeal; however, the more you
clap, the shorter time the person has to speak. Chris Hyland. Chris Hyland.
/'"'
7:15:13 PM Chris Hyland: My name is Chris Hyland. I live in the City of Lake Elsinore.
I'm here as a private citizen and I have a great deal of sympathy for these people in
Wildomar. They've tried for a long time to get their area annexed into a city and, the reason
Agenda Item No. \
Page \\ of l\ 1
PAGE 18 - PLANNING CDM:MISSIONMINUIES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
I'm speaking is this situation reminds me of a similar situation that happened years ago off of
Grand Avenue. The City annexed two areas off of Grand Avenue which most of us that have
lived here for a long, long timed called the claws. There all, it's surrounded by the County.
I've been to meetings in that area and the people gripe about the services, the police
department not called, you know, getting to them right away, so, these people in this, in these
two claws, who do they go to the County or the City? And this area what that they want to
annex here in Cotton Hills is exactly another claw and it should be stopped now because it is
a small formulation of Wildomar and why destroy these people's es and praise, praises
and so forth you get this into a city. So, that's my concern.
~
7:16:33 PM Chairman O'Neal: Thank you Chris. Gary L
40 Crab Hollow
rty line, along
7:16:41 PM Gary Lancaster: Yeah, my name is GaT):;
Circle and my wife and I we moved here over 18
with our neighbors, is one of the lines that t .
gentleman that spoke earlier here about looking ov
don't want that problem here. We moved out to \
community, and we have 9 point so odd acres, and
built our life on it, we've, and we've b ently retired.
want to go anywhere, and if this project and they
for tract development and they put all this day if cide to sell and somebody
comes up to my house and they look over ch is only 646 feet from the
road, and they see 350 'ng out the hose go to want to buy it? And my, my
feeling is that this is oy our pro y values and the map, I've studied the map
because I've got re and I i all the parcels and everything, and I
noticed how convenien right alon erybody's property line across the back
on Crab Hollo 'rcle an ed Arrow. It does not take in anything that
is already -dev d, somebody mentioned earlier that the people
ofLak sinore w be 1 ed in this, well I don't think so, and the reason, because
if w if they did, ould ncluded that in the sphere, but if they would have
include then. we'd b e'd n there too and then they would have to do something
with the ro d I don't anybody wants to undertake that cost. And, the only other.
thing I've got is I do see where you going to have schools to support all these extra
homes and peop the development down below now. People come tearing down
Lost Road that wa r ever developed but shou.ld have been to accommodate all the
traffic. That should e been paved and taken care of. People come flying through there.
It's a wonder somebody hasn't gotten killed already. But, anyway, if you haven't guessed,
I'm against the annexation completely because I'm right on the boundary line as our all my
neighbors. Thank you.
....,
7:19:43 PM Chairman O'Neal: Steve Lusty.
Page
\~
\
of 4~
,....,
Agenda Item No.
PAGE 19 - PLANNING COMMISSIONMINUfES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
,,--...
,-..
7:19:51 PM Steve Lusty: Hello. I'm Steve Lusty. I'm at 32939 Vergo Way in Wildomar.
Mr. Chair and Commissioners I'm here to speak against the, any extension of the sphere of
influence over Wildomar. I'm part of, I'm from the part of Wildomar that's been directly
effected by Murrieta trying to annex us and I've seen a lot of the animosities that have gone
across Wildomar itself, as well as with the neighboring communities, and it's, it's quite a
different perspective. I'm a little bit different than most ofthe folks, or maybe everyone else
that's spoken here. I've only been in Wildomar for three years and I spent almost 30 years
before that in PIano, Texas, just north of Dallas. That was a co unity that was both a
bedroom community, just north of the high-tech areas in Dall grew to become a
significant city, headquarters to many of the major corpo of this country. Smart
growth basically. Very, well reasoned planning, wa the community, and
participating in the development spectrum, actually 1 ating trails development
there too. I'm Secretary of the Butterfield Trails 0 really n speak for them,
but it has been very illuminating to watch, or p pate in the trails he even though
I'm on the far comer of Wildomar from this pmen, 'm familiar areas by
having been participating with trying to see good op or these tra. . Looking at
the spirit of the community, the sense of trying to wo lly with all the develop, all the
people that live there, the neighbors ar. d, and to, then back and see this development
wanting to walk away, and join L .nore, the gr e that the developers have
expressed while working for many mo Lake Elsin t not any sense of the
Wildomar people being familiar with th t a sen of neighbors that I would
have, you know, thought would have happe ould be nice to see that here
as well. So, I would lik urage you t pursue sphere of influence and instead
work with Wildomar hance to 1:) orne the city that it's working so hard to do.
Thank you.
Mativiar. I'm sorry if I'm murdering your
7:22: aul Mativiar. I live at 32200 Crooked Arrow Drive
and I ap peak to all of you tonight. I'm a teacher. I tried to
explain thi lass. They didn't get it, but let me, because now that I've seen
this picture, I . We are not bomber pilots. This is sanitized (inaudible) and
drop the bomb an is forever. You see, I live right here. (not talking into mic).
This isn't my view. . sn't the view of the coyotes, not the view of the bunny rabbits, nor
the owls, nor the gol eagles or anybody else. This is sanitized Ms. Mata, you see it. This
is sanitized. This isn t reality. She says let's just change this. Now...
7:23:22 PM Chairman O'Neal: I need you to stand in front ofthe microphone, please.
7:23:25 PM Mr. Mativiar: (inaudible) I can speak sir.
,-..
7:23:30 PM Chairman O'Neal: But you need to be recorded.
Agenda Item No.
Page \ '\
\
of ~b
PAGE 20 - PLANNING ffiMMISSION :MINUTES -FEBRUARY 21, 2006
"-"""
7:23:34 PM Mr. Mativiar: My fence line will leave, will actually border this. You see, this is
sanitized, this is not reality. This is not what's going to change, it's not what I see. They'll
fill their pockets full of money. . .
7:23:43 PM Chairman O'Neal: In front ofthe microphone please.
7:23:47 PM Mr. Mativiar: And go home. You'll drop your bombs
to live with the mess.
7:23:54 PM Chairman O'Neal: Thank you.
o home and we have
7:23:59 PM Mr. Mativiar: I'm against this. Thank y
7:24:04 PM Chairman O'Neal: Brenda Schroe
"-"""
7:25:
7:25:40 PM r. Chairman, Commissioners. My name is George Taylor. I
live at 34041 , Wildomar, in the farm, and I've given you all a copy of my
letter that I have 'm speaking in opposition of your agenda item No.5 as you've
stated it, the Cany s Estates annexation. I understand as late as last night, maybe
you've pulled this tr map, 3424, is it 49. If that's the case, then I'll refer to instead of the
development, I'll refer to it as land, which it is right now is raw land. So I'd like to read my
letter into the record if you wouldn't mind. I say, it is my understanding that your
department has received an application requesting the above subject development or land,
whichever the case may be, to be annexed into the City of Lake Elsinore. Please be advised
that the unincorporated area of Riverside known as Wildomar has also filed an application
with LAFCO for cityhood incorporation. As you are aware, in order to serve our residents, if
LAFCO approves our application, we will need to generate as much revenue as we possibly
Agenda Item No. \
Page ~ 0 of ~ 1, ....,
PAGE 21 - PLANNING CDMMISSION MINUTES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
~
can receive to start up. Hopefully, we will also be able to regain some revenue from the state
to help support the effort. We have established with LAFCO our proposed city boundaries.
That includes the area in question. We have had the required economic studies conducted
and published that support our application to LAFCO. In recent years we have successfully
rolled back the sphere of, the City of Lake Elsinore's sphere of influence that would have
taken potential commercial base from Wildomar. We have also just staved off an annexation
attempt by the City of Murrieta. These efforts were successful because of the Wildomar
citizenry united in a massive effort to fight it. Ethical practice wo . dicate that all parties
involved a proposal such of this would have been notified at st ould prefer to think
that this lack of notification to our Wildomar Municipal Adv' ouncil which is basically
our community representatives, on your part was an i ert or. Whether it was
inadvertent or not is of great concern to us and may jeo e our s that we have gone
through to get this far. Although you say the Cit 0 promot action, it is my
opinion that the City of Lake Elsinore should e advised the appli f our present
process and withheld applications for annexati if it is ill is tract 33 at or, of
the land. It's just reasonable that you do that. So equ at this time at you either
continue this or table it until such time as LAFCO n our application for cityhood.
Thank you very much.
~
7:28:46 PM Chairman O'Neal:
,,--..
and I live at 32255 Navajo
t, I like domar. You know what, I built
20, built my house 17 years ago, and went
e ber that. You guys, maybe you don't
o this massive annexation and build all
f all that stuff, and as you all know, Pardee
was awar Elsl , excuse me, and Pardee went ahead with the
develo ately 10 years ago, the city fathers of Lake. Elsinore
turn ou know what, we want to be good neighbors. We
want to I th t, you know what, okay, okay, be a good neighbor.
Since that t ere says, Wildomar was removed from the sphere of influence
from the City e and fought off a sphere of influence from Murrieta. Don't
you guys want to eighbor, I mean, come on? We want to be Wildomar. We are
Wildomar, we wan Wildomar, we want to continue with our quest for city wood,
cityhood, and I stron urge you to consider with, that request. Now, have you guys read
this thing? I mean seriously, have you read that? May I, under the LAFCO requirements
here, reasons for the proposals here. Beneficial services of annexation include a higher level
of public safety and infrastructure, okay. Well, well keep on reading because it's, are there
police stations going to be provided? Well in here it says no. Are there fire stations going to
be provided? Again in here it says no. Libraries, again it says no. Interesting. Schools?
No, it's not in here. The very premise of this application appears faulty. Also in here, it in
the report it says that the development is consistent with Riverside County's land
Agenda Item No. \
Page 'cl \ of ~ 1
PAGE 22 - PLANNING COlvtMISSION MINUfES -FEBRUARY 21, 2006
development. Riverside County's is one unit per five acres, or and/or one-acre lot
minimums. But also in this report if you read it, and I hope you have, I'm sure you must
have, it says 90 clustered units, possibly attached or detached. Now, that's a far cry from one
unit per acre, or one unit for every five acres. Something is amiss here. Something's,
something's not right, okay. I'm not against development. But let's do it right, okay. First
of all we don't want to be a part of Lake Elsinore and, and we want the development to be
proportionate with the area. We're not here to discuss a map. We're not here to discuss
things that are already drawn and saying this is the developmen ut you know what, a
tentative map, map is required, was required and submitted and audible). I beg you
sir, one more minute.
~
7:32:24 PM Chairman O'Neal: No.
7:32:32 PM Mr. Uraine: Roads, dust, dirt, road ra
on this annexation. Thank you for the ten seco
7:32:57 PM Mr. Cashman: Commissio
issue. I think you probably.
.......,
ame is Bo Cashman. I live at 23630 Peggy Lane in
do ar Cityhood Committee, Wildomar
at we will pose at every turn and at every level any
territory that lies within our proposed city
es. e boundaries have long been recognized. In
of the Wildomar Municipal Advisory Council 1988.
s of the unincorporated community of Wildomar
approve of '9 Further, they are the boundaries recently evaluated by
a municipa annexation incorporation city, study by the City of Murrieta.
Lake Elsinore ipant of this study. Further, they are the boundaries used by
the Board of S their resolution to initiate the incorporation of Wildomar.
Finally, they are t daries currently part of the incorporation application filed in
November 2006 at erside County LAFCO. We've been here before. In 1986 the
newspapers called our fight about boundary changes a bitter fight. In 1990 it was called a
hostile boundary dispute. Thousands of people in Wildomar protested against boundary
issues that the City of Lake Elsinore had a design over. And again in '93 and again in '95,
and again in '97 when it was finally put to rest we thought, by LAFCO removing your sphere
of influence from these boundaries. Now someone comes along and provides you or
someone with the, to our minds, sideways legal maneuver that may allow you to piecemeal
annex a piece of Wildomar. Somebody offers you an opportunity to, to disrespect your soon
Agenda Item No. \
Page ~ ~ of l1,~
.......,
PAGE 23 - PLANNING CO:MMISSION MINlITES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
--
to be neighboring city, don't take it seriously, what you should do is send this back to the
County and to the community of Wildomar and let us deal with it. This particular boundary
has been in place since 1986 and has formally been recognized since '97. With regard to the
project itself, the Canyon Hills Estates and the annexation, the abrupt attempt to annex this
area is inappropriate. We have submitted our application for incorporation. The current
Wildomar boundary in this area is along a natural geographic feature and represents a logical
boundary for the city limits of Wildomar. Please recommend to your City Council that this
annexation be denied. Thank you.
7:36:29 PM Chairman O'Neal: Bridget Moore.
ativiar. I live at 32200 Crooked Arrow
y Hills. Went for a ride one day in the
house. Got my husband to come look at
everyt ound it two and a half acres, five acres. This
. is the community we want to live in. Been to a few
web site. I want to live in Wildomar, this area that
IS 1 ildomar. I feel that any development that happens in
omar should benefit from, not the people of Lake Elsinore.
ity. I now call Wildomar my home and I prefer that the
my property remain Wildomar. I ask that you please reject this
7:36:36 PM Bridget Moore: Good evening. My name i
Spring Road in Wildomar. As our sign says, we
influence, and we want no annexation. And, y
printer can't spell. As Kirt said, the Wildom
MAC, a five-member appointed board by upe
pointed out the roads on the map, Lost Road, Congl
Vickie Mata states the landowners ve lived there
community members. So for 20 year 've been co
Wildomar, so I have to ask, why now do to be Lake
,-..
7:37:29 PM Chairman O'Neal:
want to murder your las
7:37:42 PM Linda
Road, formerly lived i
back hills of
this house
is wha
W
they're
that area,
Again, I live
surrounding area
annexation. Thank
,-..
7:38:47 PM Chairman O'Neal: Thank you. Bringing it back up to the dais here. I wish you
all good luck in your drive for cityhood. However, I'm not interested in continuing, tabling
or any other institutional delay of the matter before us for the following reasons. Regardless
of the number of demands WiN with a small "i" makes, and regardless if WiN with a small
"i" represents hundreds of residents, it does not trump Fifth Amendment rights for the
property owners. This request to annex the 246.4 acres into Lake Elsinore is developer
driven. In other words, it is their constitutional right to make a request of Lake Elsinore and
Agenda Item No. \
Page ~ ~ of ~ ~
PAGE 24 - PLANNING CDMMISSION MINUTES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
we are obligated to respond. For the record, La,ke Elsinore did not look at a map and say, hey
gee here's some prime land all set for annexation. Our city is not Murrieta. We are not
cherry picking. Weare not piecemealing annexation. Further, it is interesting to note that
WiN with a small "i" chose not to address any developer rights. As a matter of fact, WiN
with a small "i" chose not to explain any reasons why this property should remain in so-
called Wildomar. Statements like quote, Lake Elsinore should keep away from our
boundaries, does not bother to express how this action hobbles its incorporation glance.
Gordon Barrens has owned 160 acres for 66 years and expresses. . sh that this property
become a part of the wonderful city of Lake Elsinore, that's a q d laughter from the
audience) Finally, when you chose, when you chose to ins City staff, you chose to
insult all the residents of Lake Elsinore. I don't, I for old with that kind of
arrogance or dismissive behavior. Commissioner LaPer
7:40:47 PM Commissioner LaPere: Thank you M
7:40:54 PM Chairman O'Neal: Certainly.
. st as, want to thank you all for
This is the right of every
citizens, and I respect
l's righ, regardless of whether they
, e made notes relative to items
ill try t elp maybe enlighten a little bit.
for your mformation, each individual school
. t or other school districts, have the
they choos ey go through the state, they get their
e city, they don't have that right. They go
at. ne, as a member of the Commission, have no
o move toward an annexation, however, I have to take
vidual who owns the land, of a potential developer
land ould they buy that land and I understand it is in escrow,
we have to respect that, the same as we are trying to respect
t to listen to you as to what you have to say. Any Fifth
, we must consider. I mentioned schools. Police, is handled in
sinore by the Riverside County Sheriff's Department so I would
suspect that the, the ounty Sheriff Department would handle things in Wildomar if you
choose to hire them, or get your own police force. Wildomar being proposed has several
obstacles as I understand them to overcome and you're working toward that effort. You need
more tax revenue. We would hope that the Governor in, in Sacramento would return some of
the funds that were withdrawn for every city, from every city, as in relationship with the
vehicle, vehicle tax. This I'm sure would help you immensely as it relates to getting
revenues for your incorporation. However, that's not done yet, and quite frankly, I don't
know if it will ever be done. I mean, there's a lot of promises that come from the state
Agenda Item No. ,
Page ~ '" of l\ l
'-'"
~
'-'
PAGE 25 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
,r"'
sometimes they just don't come through. And we can do wishful thinking all afternoon. I
for one as an individual, do not like the attitude and I take exception on page 19 is an
example. Page 19 of this, of this letter that was written by, I believe Cindy, if I, if I'm
correct. Cheryl Aide, I'm sorry. On page 19, the last statement does the Planning
Commission members understand the implications of what they're being asked to vote on. I
would submit to you that we do. We're not going after anything in Wildomar. We're
responding to a request from an individual who has a right to request, we're responding to a
potential developer who has the right to develop, and this is what . 11 about, and we have
to keep that scope narrow as it relates to the annexation, as it reI ne change, and, and
other General Plan amendment. Now, Lake Elsinore City G Ian. In, in working with
the (inaudible) and other people relative to that including , that plan is not fully
developed yet. I'm sure there will be changes from to that it's adopted by
the City Council. Until that happens, we have obli eral Plan of the
last time that it was put forth, and I believe that w So we have to
use that General Plan in our actions that we t eeping in
mind the ingress and egress traffic, there is, I eli not sure h many acres,
but maybe the. gentleman who was talking about it ity of Lake ElSInore, for your
information, on the multiple-species bitat, was hit th est of any of the cities in this
area. I think we had to provide some, 'ng over clos 6,000 acres of multi-species
habitat. This particular potential land as as the mu es on it. I think there's
,r"' over 100 acres, and you can correct me i at are s aside for that specific item
of multi-species habitat. Okay. Now. I res cte 0 you. Now you, you owe us
the same consideration rn. Okay. , in my t ing, because there are so many
approvals that have t ':ve before b oming a CIty, I'm leaning in a direction and I
have to state this " issioners,' leaning in a direction that we would at
this time take no acti be determ a whether or not LAFCO will approve
Wildomar as No e should put a time limit on that only to
recognize th owns that land, with all due respect, and the
develo n that land. Okay. That's my thinking right now. I
hav ay again, I thank you for coming out this evening.
We app eriou onsideration your comments that you've made tonight
both positi ise. I don't want to say negative because they're positiv~ to
you, not, not erybody else. Okay. Mr. Chairman I probably used up three
times my three m felt it had to be explored and I thank you for that time.
Neal: Thank you Commissioner LaPere. Commissioner Gonzales.
,,-...
7:48:26 PM Commissioner Gonzales: I lived in Wildomar for seven years and the only
reason I moved out was because the freeway came through and there was an off-ramp where
my house was. So I moved to north of Elsinore which eventually became annexed. And, I
know your feelings and I feel the same way. I agree with Mr. LaPere that it should be
postponed until we hear from LAFCO. The developer can still go through and either use the
City or the County, it still can be developed that area. I would be very concerned with what
Agenda Item No. \
Page 'lS of lQ)
PAGE 26 - PLANNING CDMMISSIONMINUfES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
happens to Lost Road. I've lived in this area for 42 years so and I used to go up, not Lost
Road, Cottonwood Canyon Road, and I've driven driver's ed cars all up and down Lost Road
many times and it's nice. And now it's just massive cars all the time and, but I would rather
postpone this untilLAFCO makes a decision. That's my feeling right now.
...,.,
7:49:27 PM Chairman O'Neal: Vice Chairman Larimer.
7:49:32 PM Vice Chairman Larimer: Thank you Chairman Q'N
the developer. Jeremy would you come back to the podium pI
question earlier why Trumark didn't, does not want to be a
explain that?
-.".,I
7:51:33 P
Cashman.
Incorporation
Let's see, there was a gentleman, Bob
You are chairman of the Wildomar
7:52:09 PM Vice Chairman Larimer: Okay. I have just a few questions for you.
7:52:14 PM Mr. Cashman: Sure.
7:52:19 PM Vice Chairman Larimer: And you can clear it up for me. Has your committee
ever spoken directly to the landowners about staying in the city, or in Wildomar?
Agenda Item No.
Page ';} b of
\
41>
......,
PAGE 27 - PLANNING ffiMMISSIONMINUfES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
/"""'
7:52:23 PM Mr. Cashman: Well, we would be happy to but the landowners have not
approached our committee.
7:52:27 PM Vice Chairman Larimer: And your committee has not approached the
landowners?
7:52:31 PM Mr. Cashman: We would have no reason to approach them and, unless they had
filed something and the only thing they've filed was with you, but would be happy to do
that. We have no problem.
/"""'
7:52:39 PM Mr. Cashman: LAFCO will not deny.
on it. I see, if LAFCO denies cityhood, Wildo
can do to make LAFCO a city, to make Wildomar
7:52:34 PM Vice Chairman Larimer:
next step?
7:52:59 PM Vice Chairman Larimer:
7:53:04 PM Mr. Cashman:
other questions?
city. Did you have any
.verside right now has our planning but
will be sh , we'll have a planning department that
what they, is appropriate for this area and,
o do to it because surely they have the right to
7:53:46 P
develop th
where they w
arim . So, okay, so you do agree that they have the right to
o you agree that the landowners have a right to decide now
It's inappropriate right now. Things are in a flux right now.
They hadn't noticed at these boundaries have been in place since 1986 and that, those
boundaries run on the other side of the, of this property that they're talking about. They
could have noticed that and had they noticed it, they probably would have approached us, or,
they had some other reason, I don't know what it is. I don't know if I answered your
question.
7:54:23 PM Vice Chairman Larimer: I'm not sure either.
~
Agenda Item No.
Page 'l \.
\
of 4~
PAGE 28 - PLANNING CDMMISSION MINlITES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
7:54:27PM Mr. Cashman: Yeah, could you ask it again.
~
7:54:30 PM Vice Chairman Larimer: Actually, I forgot what I asked.
7:54:33 PM Mr. Cashman: That was pretty good.
7:54:40 PM Vice Chairman Larimer: Okay, let's, what I'm
landowner's right to develop their property or to be a part of Lake
someone owns 160 acres or 80 acres, that's a lot of acres for t
have the same rights as everyone else to determine what they
concerned with are the
'nore or Wildomar. If
o . Shouldn't they
do with their property?
in place right now.
. verside and, and
ge of zoning,
. ns under
being done
7:55:35 PM Chairman O'Neal: Comml
panel, would you mind taking a five-min
....."
7:55:45 PM Speaker
7:56:
Thank you.
8:03:17 PM Chairman O'Neal: Please take your seats. Please take your seats. Hey Rolfe,
I'm waiting on you. Thank you very much. We're back in at 8:05 and Mrs. Larimer you
were, Commissioner Larimer, Vice Chairman, you had the floor.
8:03:45 PM Mr. Cashman: Do you want me to come back up?
Page
~D of
\
~~
......"
Agenda Item No.
PAGE 29 - PLANNING CDMMISSIONMINUI'ES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
r--.
8:03:48 PM Vice Chairman Larimer: Yeah, I just like looking at you, why don't you come
. back up here?
8:03:50 PM Commissioner LaPere: Don't worry, she's married.
8:03:54 PM Mr. Cashman: How can I help you?
8:04:01 PM Vice Chairman Larimer: Did you ever answer my I
the property owner?
there in Wildomar?
8:04:07 PM Mr. Cashman: the property owner has a
accordance with the plans that are currently on the boo
happen to be, I believe, rural mountainous and five
can develop his property in accordance with the
problem, except that, of course, he needs to go
gonna do it to make sure that he has satisfied t e r
we're not there. But those things would also come up
exists right now.
8:04:48 PM Vice Chairman Larimer:
~
8:04:57 PM Vice Chai
you represent with
are clearly thinking that we will have no
8:05.
Pere What is the certain timeline whereby LAFCO has to
The timeline for this round is...
8:05:39 PM Commissioner LaPere: Not this round, what is the timeline? Don't hedge on
me. I want a specific answer. What is the timeline that LAFCO has given you by which to
have an answer in your hands relative to your city-hood?
8:05:50 PM Mr. Cashman: Late August.
~
8:05:53 PM Commissioner LaPere: Late August of this year?
Agenda Item No. \
Page ~ '\ of tS~
PAGE 30 - PLANNING COMMISSION :MINUfES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
'-'
8:05:57 PM Mr. Cashman: Correct
8:06:00 PM Mr. Commissioner LaPere: And late August meaning what to your committee?
8:06:04 PM Mr. Cashman: Meaning that it's going to be contingent on the exact time the
auditor has prepared the finances for the next year. So that's generally some time in August.
It could be later, but it's generally, so I in fact asked him that quest" today and he said mid
to late August.
'-'
8:06: 18 PM Commissioner LaPere: Mid to late August. T
give you at this point?
8:06:26 PM Mr. Cashman:
8:06:33 PM Commissioner LaPere If I were to cal
expect to act on the request of the City ofWildomar,
8:06:39 PM Mr. Cashman: They wi
everything has to be completed by Augu
8:06:48 PM Commissioner LaPere: Ok, tha
ssioner LaPere. I would like to turn to
ISCUSS a little bit about some of these issues
8:07: : Just briefly in order to make sure that some of the
Issues r and dressed so that all of the Planning Commissioner's
concerns m d to run through a short list of issues that I jotted down from
the Public He g a brief review of those issues, I'd then like to address the
specific question his Commission can postpone or put off these proceedings until
LAFCO takes actio re's a few governing provisions of Cortese Knox Act that do affect
that. I wanted to bri hose to your attention and then we can discuss any viable parameters
on postponement, if in fact that's still a direction that the Commission would like to visit.
First, I've got a list of about 14 issues. The first issue came up quite frequently with the
notice provision. There was concern about whether or not Wildomar was notified of this
Negative Declaration, this development application, in the form of an annexation proposal.
And just to make it absolutely clear in the record, there were two entities that were notified in
Wildomar. That included the Wildomar Chamber of Commerce and that's at 33751 Mission
Trail and P.O. Box 885, Wildomar; and also went to WIN, attention Jan Castenon, 33751
Agenda Item No. \
Page 30 of 4 l '-'
~
~
~
PAGE 31- PLANNING mMMISSIONMINUfES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
Mission Trail, P.O. Box 885, Wildomar, CA. 92515. Just wanted to make sure that this is the
submittal date for circulation of the Initial Study and Negative Declaration, appendix A-2.
This would have been distributed at the beginning of the comment period, and I believe it
was January 20th. On a second note, area that came up for discussion was the area of trails.
Again staff has made it very clear and I believe even Wildomar understands that this in an
Annexation application. Infrastructure and project level entitlements are not being
considered at the present time and I believe that trail issues can rightfully be brought up in
subsequent public hearings; including the general plan updat cess that's ongoing
currently which will address this project. Second is roads, 11 answer to that, all
infrastructure based on a decision are project level. The plan update is going to
assume a certain dwelling unit count and use that for the. astructure analysis so
that general plan update process is something that you .n; and as a point of
clarification the general plan advisory committee m sing this project
and there was a comment to the effect that th ade specific
comments to this project and Rolfe can go int e was an
issue raised about the historical significance or s mines. CE guidelines,
section 15064.5 is a very detailed guideline that talk historical resources again at the
point where there's a project level e .tlement, historic .ficance of resources will be
determined. And in fact, it goes beyon it goes to pre and cultural resources and
the City is coordinating under SB 18 wi anga Band eno Mission Indians to
address prehistorical and cultural signific That is consultation process that's
required at the general plan amendment Ie oing for this project; will be
ongoing as part ofthe g update. e's some ncern over the 30 day comment
period that ended yes ay. to point 0 that comments are all valid up to the close of
the public hearin is 0 .ng right w. And that's the purpose of the public
hearing is to take yo address th , which I'm doing, which staff has been
doing and the itted c been reviewed and have been summarized
by some 0 en are bem dressed right now. And they are addressed in
the sta .11 co to be addressed when this goes to the decision making
bod cil. e was a comment about wildlife concerns. I just
wanted the CP that this property is actually in an area that had no
cell criteria. t there were no identified qualitative or quantitative criteria for
conservation operty and open space, so again there has been an incidental
take permit issu tire MSHCP and this is something that endangered habitats
league, sierra club erybody else as stakeholders bought into. There was confusion
over what open spa as being proposed at the conceptual level and because there was a
conceptual site map, it was identified as a tract map, it was given a tract map number,
although the City can't take action on a tract map on property that's not in the City, that site
map, that conceptual site map, did indicate that approximately 130 acres in the interior of the
project would be set aside for conservation. Although the MSHCP does not require it, that's
what being proposed at the conceptual level at the present time. Schools and roads, again
SB50, Commissioner LaPere addressed it. It is a state mandated activity. The state and the
division of state architects determine where schools go. Senate Bill 50 dictates what
\
Page ?> \ of 4 ~
Agenda Item No.
PAGE 32 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
developers pay per dwelling unit to fund schools and unfortunately the state has preempted
that field of law and the City does not have a whole lot of say about that. There was
discussion about good neighbors and I just wanted to point out that there is quite a bit of
history to this area. As we all know, it was within the City of Lake Elsinore prior to 1997.
The City did defend its rights for some of its spheres of influence areas, unincorporated
communities and community of interest designations. And during the Murrieta annexation, it
was the City of Lake Elsinore, initially, that really was the, took the forefront and threatened
litigation against the City of Murrieta, which resulted in a tolling a ent under California
Environmental Quality Act. So it was the City of Lake Elsi tha as fairly active in
ensuring that a portion of Wildomar was not annexed i e City of Murrieta. In
addressing those issues that came up, what we now have i of whether or not the
City can or should postpone their approval of this acti 't e as LAFCO takes
action on an annexation proposal or basically the i ildomar. There
are two provisions of the Cortese-Knox Act tha Government
Code Section 56375, subpart A, subpart 3. ISSlon,
LAFCO, shall require as a condition to annexa 10
annexed. If you read that requirement, that mandate
of annexation, if you read Governme Code Section 56
proposals, pending before the Commi onflict in an
other as determined by the Commission, ission ma
for conducting any further proceedings b those p osals. That determination
shall be included in the terms and conditio mmission. In the absence of
that determination, prio . en to that p ding th all be based upon the proposal
first filed with the e tive r. So, the rtese-Kriox Act recognizes that pre-zoning
shall be a conditi anne on proceedl d that there is competing proposals. I
think that's what we h e statute address that, and there's a procedure in
place by whi at will ommission would probably be skirting its
obligatio 'ust t's see happens in the next six months to a year to
possibl as b rocess that has been going on for about nine years, by
my bliga r pre-zoning, I would opine that it would not be the
appropn mmi on to defer to a future discretionary action of LAFCO
before taki r pre-zoning. That isn't to say that as a policy matter, I don't
perceive any t would mandate a continuance. From a policy level, this
Commission cou re concerns that haven't been addressed, and if the Commission
doesn't believe sta dress those concerns presently, certainly a reasonable continuance
could be considered.
8:18:25 PM Commissioner LaPere: Mr. Chairman can I ask a question? In layman terms,
you say that the Commission could, if it chose, to act on a pre-zoning, but defer action on
annexation.
.....,
.....,
8:18:38 PM Deputy City Attorney Miles: I'm saying that the Commission should, is
obligated to undertake the pre-zoning, but if, again, the question was with respect to whether
Agenda Item No. \
Page ?>~ of ~ ~ '-"
PAGE 33 - PLANNING CDMMISSIONMINUfES -FEBRUARY 21t 2006
/'"'""
you can wait until LAFCO rules on an incorporation proposal. And what I pointed out is
there are two provisions. One that talks about how to deal with conflicting proposals and a
second provision that talks about pre-zoning having to be a precursor to an annexation
proposal before LAFCO. So this Commission should pre-zonet and that pre-zoning and
annexation proposal can be reviewed by LAFCO contiguously with the Wildomar
incorporation proposal. Now continuously would be for the whole thing. This Planning
Commission can always continue an item if there are concerns that are not addressedt you
can have a continuance to a date certaint however much time you . need. A continuance
level is always an option for the Commission. LegallYt rm no cel ing any reason why
that would be a mandate at the present time, and from my re Cortese-Knox Act, this
Commission should act on the pre-zoning indirect, with 0 what the Wildomar
incorporation application is. You don't have control 0 r ame for that could
go on, who knows how long.
8:20:25 PM Commissioner Gonzales: Could I a
/'"'"" 8:20:54 PM Deputy City Attorney Miles: ain an .rt can jump in here. The
pre-zoning is really part and parcel to the Planning Commission is
being asked to do right to contin this item in its entirety, that can
be something that c terms of whether or not this Commission
could put off its d.e .0 by LAFCO, what I pointed out is that
there is a pre-zoning ox Act and LAFCO has the statutory
ability to deal comp procedure of the Cortese-Knox Act allows
LAFCO t is n pro and the Wildomar incorporation proposal at
the s . on that the incorporation proposal needs to be resolved
befo ission can undertake its pre-zoning function.
8:22:05 PM
another word ,
they can look at
: In other words, neither application trumps either. So in
n is not affected by whatever action we take here. Because
at the same time.
/'"'""
8:22:22 PM Deputy C Attorney Miles: LAFCO may have a viewpoint on priority, and I
did read that provision as well, but the Cortese-Knox Act envisions that LAFCO will be able
to look at those competing proposals and make a determination. We don't know when that
will occur, so if you need continuance based on concerns that haven't been addressed or
you're not at a l~vel where you feel you can make a decision at the present time that can be
entertained. But it's basically the entirety of this application. There's really no, with the
Negative Declaration, Pre-Zoning and the General Plan Amendment, there's really no reason
to move forward on one and not the other.
Agenda Item No. \
Page 3') of ~ 1>
PAGE 34 - PLANNING CDMMISSION MINUTES -FEBRUARY 21, 2006
..""
8:23:12 PM Commissioner Gonzales: The developer can't do anything until LAFCO makes a
final decision, so it just sits there. We're going to say here's two proposals; you decide
which one is acceptable. Basically, that's what its saying.
8:23:27 PM Deputy City Attorney Miles: That could be one of the effects. I'm sure that the
applicant may differ on whether they can't do anything about LAFCO, but in terms of what
this Planning Commission is being asked to do, you have the abir do that now and it's
not dependent upon whether or not LAFCO says yea or neah to omar incorporation
effort. You're being asked to process pre-zoning and an ann and that should be done
independent on an incorporation proposal and the Cortes statute envisions that
LAFCO can deal with both of those proposals.
8:24:10 PM Vice Chairman Larimer: I have a qu
this project to be annexed, does that mean that
answer to that, but I want you to say it.
of presumptions here. I would
CO process because they
, a typical part of the
CO w engage in. They may see
ions to the south of Wildomar
y come t of their comprehensive fiscal
hat's the fight that you had with Murrieta at
oval of this acreage will affect their
n is entirely based on, so it would seem
w to an incorporation effort; would be the
.....,
8:25: evelopment Preisendanz: I wanted to make a
commen want to reiterate that the Commission has every right to
continue i feel like they need more information, but this project is a pre-
zomng, pre-ap xation and still needs to go through City Council, LAFCO and
actually come ba quite a ways away from actually annexing in. So I just want to
make sure that the ission understands and hears what Steve is saying that they can
continue if the need , but this is definitely the first step in the process. The other thing I
wanted to comment on was the GP AC committee. I have been presenting projects there for a
few months now and at the beginning of the General Plan Update, we did not route projects
to the GP AC because we did not have direction to bring projects; but at the last General Plan
Advisory Committee, I did bring this annexation to the GP AC and generally there was a
comment that they did not like the annexation. What they were concerned about was the
slope analysis. They were concerned that if this ever came into the City that we would look
at preserving as much of the slope as possible. And what I presented to them at that meeting
Agenda Item No. \
Page 34 of ~ B
....,
PAGE 35 - PLANNING CDMMISSIONMINUfES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
/""'
was a conceptual site plan or the "tentative tract map)) so I just wanted to clarify that we did
bring this to the General Plan Advisory Committee.
8:27:26 PM Chairman O'Neal: Thank you Rolfe. Is there any further discussion on this?
8:27:31 PM Vice Chairman Larimer: Ifwe continue this, that's holding up the process, so we
should make a decision.
Commissioner, what you don't see is the business deal on the
e the end result for that business deal in front of you. There is a 2
year period in whic take an action and it sounds as if we might be standing idle for a
period of time where nothing gets to happen if there is a continuance that comes about the
way I'm hearing in the audience.
we were talking about
process that needs to be
8:27:36 PM Chairman O'Neal: You should continue this if you
about whether or not you should annex this. If you have al
then you should approve. It's that simple. If you feellik
can't make this decision, then you need to make a
certain, for whatever information that you need to g
now. Rolfe.
8:28:13 PM Planning Commissioner LaPere: Mr.
Jeremy would come forward please? I have a questi
what would that do to your plans, in a tshell?
/""'
8:28:54 PM Jeremy Krout: The main
as far the annexation. It really is the
considered by many bodies and that proces
tion request. LAFCO has a certain time
proves it. The concern is as far as tying it
that t eave their own time frame and LAFCO will
CO to consider our project as a body who considers
e want to put in their hands to decide this project as
uld at the plans, the services and so forth at a later date,
once the annexation is approved or during that process.
8:30:47 PM Commissioner LaPere: I wonder if it would be appropriate to make a motion at
this time.
/"""
8:30:58 PM Chairman O'Neal: What kind of motion would you like to make?
Agenda Item No.
Page
?>s
\
of ~\
PAGE 36 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -FEBRUARY 21, 2006
~
8:31 :07 PM Commissioner LaPere: I would like to make a motion to continue to date certain.
8:31:11 PM Chairman O'Neal: And how long would that be?
8:31: 17 PM Commissioner LaPere: I would say until the first meeting in September.
8:31:17 PM Chairman O'Neal: There is a motion on the floor
September.
8:31 :23 PM. Commissioner LaPere:
8:31:29 PM Office Specialist III A1exen: That would
8:31 :35 PM Commissioner LaPere: I would Ii
September 5th and if there is still no action om
applying, we revisit this and take appropriate action a
8:31:46 PM Chairman O'Neal: Do I ha
8:31 :48 PM Vice Chairman Larimer: Dis
~.
. Yes. I just want to be clear about what the developer
ber will you be past the two year period?
8:32:19 PM t stands idle during that period of time, nothing has happened,
it will come b r, but we don't know whether you're going to say yes or no at
that point in time ous ither, so does the developer go ahead and consummate the deal,
do they continue ng money during this period time, do they continue in the
government process? e don't know where that really puts us at all. It would end in
November and I don't think this agency is prepared to move us through your system in City
Council prior to November, starting in September, I don't think it's humanly possible, let
alone procedurally possible.
8:33:06 PM Chairman O'Neal: I have to say that I'm totally against this continuance. I do not
understand the point to continuing this until September for the main reason is that if you need
more information, Ron, I'd be more than happy to have the staff to get you more information
Agenda Item No. \
Page 3b of ~~
....."
PAGE 37 - PLANNING COMMISSIONMINlITES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
~
to continue it to a two week period, but it's simply not in the best interest of what we're
doing here to continue this until next September. Quite frankly, I'm ready to act on this
particular business this evening. I believe that as the attorney has suggested to us, that there
are two tracts and neither one affects the other one in terms of what decision ultimately will
be made by LAFCO. I think we are behooving to the property owners to address their
concerns. I believe that that is more significant and trumps the committees that the area of
Wildomar have put together for their business. And quite frankly, that you become a City,
I'm not against that and you should understand that, so that wou why I would not be
particularly interested in continuing this until next Septem ink that's counter
productive, particularly to the people who have money on the
8:34:58 PM Commissioner LaPere: Thank you for y:
attorney has indicated that our action could have a di
them as a City in not a positive way and that's
continue this until that certain date in Septem
has responded to them yea or nea, that we t e
leaning at that point in time would be that we go t
least gives them the opportunity to h from that gove
for a response. And I apologize to the er or to a de
to the owner, but at some point in tim n is goin
suggested September 5th, which is our firs temb
~
an I make a quick point. With
al of 2 6 acres will or will not affect the
ination that LAFCO will make, and
t Code Section 56655, which states that
ghing of competing proposals and that will
that ou . gain it's based on a lot of factors that I don't
iew ofLAFCO I think it's probably largely based on
eloped, namely the Comprehensive Fiscal Analysis
.n ad Ion to a litany of other documents and evidence that
at competing proposals. So if your concern is not wanting to
tion effort, LAFCO will be making that determination if and
ation proposal.
8:37:31 PM Commiss
8:37:38 PM Chairman O'Neal: is there any further discussion on this particular matter?
8:37:42 PM Commissioner Gonzales: I'd like to withdraw my motion.
~
8:37:55 PM Chairman O'Neal: Ok. So now there is a motion with no second. Is there any
second?
Agenda Item No.
Page ') 1
\
of ~~
PAGE 38 - PLANNING COMMISSION:MINUfES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
.....,
8:38:01 PM Commissioner Gonzales: I withdrew my second.
8:38:08 PM Chairman O'Neal: So there's a first with no second. Call for a second. Hearing
none, Rolfe.
8:38:19 PM Vice Chairman Larimer: I'm sorry, were we going to have a discussion?
8:39:10 PM Chairman O'Neal: So y
would be your motion?
. e between both the
I do think that
think that the
ething in
8:38:26 PM Deputy City Attorney Miles: The motion failed :D
back to square one. The proposal before you or to entertain
8:38:37 PM Vice Chairman Larimer: Well, I'd like to e
extremes we have here in the audience and here
September is a long time and that's going affe
Wildomar residents probably need some mor
maybe 45 days.
8:39:20 PM Vice Chairman Larimer:
anything until June.
""""
8:39'
you Mr. Chairman for your patience.
M , SECONDED BY LARIMER WITH A
VOT H GONZALES AND LAPERE CASTING
THE DI VOTES TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO.
2006-14, A UTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE, Y OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMEI~DING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF NEGATIVE
DECLARATION NO. 2006-02.
Agenda Item No. \
Page '?> ~ of ~ ~ .....,
PAGE 39 - PLANNING CDMMISSIONMINUTES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
~
MOVED BY O'NEAL, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
15, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 2005-08 AMENDING THE CITY'S
BOUNDARY TO INCORPORATE PARCELS SPECIFICALLY
DESCRIBED AS APN(S) 365-220-026, 365-230-001, 00 6,007,
009, 010, 011, 012, AND 013. THE MOTION FAIL TO
LACK OF A SECOND.
~
F LED DUE TO LACK
TION NO. 2006-17, A
COMMISSION OF THE
NORE, CALIFORNIA,
THE CITY COUNCIL THE
~CEEDINGS TO ANNEX THE
NA AS ANNEXATION NO. 75 APN(S)
001, 005, 006, 007, 009, 010, 011, 012, AND
ORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY
There being no furth usiness, Chairman O'Neal closed the Public Hearing at 8:43:54 PM
and called a five minute recess.
8:55:13 PM Chairman O'Neal reconvened the meeting.
8:55:22 PM Deputy City Attorney Miles: Mr. Chairman, if! may, I have a point of order in
the last sequence of approvals or lack of approvals.
~
Agenda Item No. \
Page J\ of 4~
PAGE 40 - PLANNING CDMMISSIONMINlITES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
8:55:29 PM Chairman O'Neal: Ok.
.....,
8:55:37 PM Deputy City Attorney Miles: I know that the public hearing was closed, but I
believe the public hearing is closed before it comes to the dais, anyhow, so we have an
inconsistency in the Resolutions and the first Resolution 2006-14 by nature of a 2-2 vote on
the Negative Declaration results in neither approval or denial of the recommended action
which is recommended approval by the City Council. The nature of that would be that the
Negative Declaration would merely proceed to City Council for ap 1. However, with the
absence of any approval of the findings and the merits of th ega e Declaration, it is
impossible for us to proceed on with a General Plan ent. The General Plan
Amendment Resolution 2006-15 failed for a lack ofa sec ause of that you can't
actually take action on the Zone Change, which passed f that, is that if you
can't do the General Plan Amendment, you can't effi 0 because ofthe
consistency ofthat, by a legal fiat, we can basicall -2 vote failed.
I would ask, just for clarification that the roval of
Resolution 2006-16 in lighf of the fact that that res the 2-2 vote
on the environmental document.
8:57:20 PM Commissioner LaPere: So,
ard and the effect of the
have a reconsideration of the
ith a 2- ote on the Negative Declaration
, you can't take action on the Resolution on
. or lack of a second.
.....,
art of the 3-1 vote, I could recall for the
8:58: .
8:58:09 PM Direc
ahead and read the
CO,. unity Development Preisendanz: Do you want me to go
1\ron again?
8:58:16 PM Deputy City Attorney Miles: Yes, please.
8:58:13 PM Director of Community Development Preisendanz: We are looking at the
Resolution for the pre-zoning?
8:58:17 PM Deputy City Attorney Miles: Yes.
Agenda Item No.
Page 40 of
\
~~
.....,
.PAGE 41 - PLANNING CDM:M!SSIONMINUfES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
,,-..
8:58: 17 PM Director of Community Development Preisendanz: Ok.
8:59:12 PM Vice Chairman Larimer: I'm sorry, I was waiting for discussion again. I wasn't
clear. I voted for this in the beginning.
8:59:25 PM Deputy City Attorney Miles: Is this a question for me Commissioner?
8:59:30 PM Vice Chairman Larimer: Yes.
,,-..
8:59:40 PM Vice Chairman
vote.
8:59:36 PM Deputy City Attorney Miles: What are you not cl
Ron made a motion to approve.
n nobody seconded, so the whole thing dies. Which
rimer: No, I understand that, but ifthat's not my desired
Neal: Ok, I have a first on the floor if you'd like to second.
9:01:29 PM Vice Chairman Larimer: I'll second.
..--
Agenda Item No.
Page 4- \ of
PAGE 42 - PLANNING CDMMISSIONMINUfES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY LARIMER, AND
VOTED 2-2, NO ACTION WAS TAKEN ON RESOLUTION NO.
2006-16, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE, APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE
(PREZONE) NO. 2005-09 \ TO CHANGE THE ZONING
DESIGNATION OF THE PARCELS SPECI ALLY
DESCRIBED AS APN 365-220-026, 365-230-001 TH -013
TO SP SPECIFIC PLAN SUBJECT TO THE CO ION OF
ANNEXATION NO. 75
....."
9:01:37 PM Vice Chairman Larimer: That's the s
9:01:50 PM Planning Commissioner LaPere:
an act' results in neither
e was recommended
sion making body, the City
...."
reisendanz: Thank you Steve. I just
9:02:27 PM Chairman O'Neal requested Community Development Director Preisendanz to
introduce to project to the Commission.
9:02:52 PM Community Development Director Preisendanz stated that this item is a
response to approximately 85 acres of land which is being donated by La Strada Partners as a
result of Tentative Tract Map Number 32077, and this is a requirement pursuant to
Government Code Section 65402 which the City Attorney's office has eloquently prepared
Agenda Item No. \
Page 4 ~ of ~ ~ ....,
PAGE 43 - PLANNING COMMISSIONMINUfES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
/'"'-.
and I appreciate their contribution to this. He stated that they are recommending that the
Planning Commission determine that the acquisition of the donated property by Grant Deed
to the City an acquisition of property inconformity with the General Plan. He noted there are
actually 4 recommendations. He stated that this proposal would determine that the
acquisition of the donated property in subsequent conveyance of the right-of-way for La
Strada Road is consistence with the MSHCP and the General Plan circulation element and
with the acquisition the proposed final map will remain in substantial compliance with the
map. He stated that Staff would direct City Council as required Section 65042 of the
Government Code.
7. General
Homes for A
Elsinore.
Determination for Re uested Grant Deed to Pardee
3.27 Acres of Ci -Owned Land within the Ci of Lake
9:04:33 PM Chairman O'Neal requested comments from th
9:04:33 PM Commissioner LaPere concurred with St
9:04:35 PM Vice Chairman Larimer concurred
9:04:41 PM Commissioner Gonzales concurred with
9:05:14 PM There being no further discu
/'""-
9:05:23 PM Chairman O'Neal requested the reading of the Staff Report.
~
9:05:33 PM Community Development Director Preisendanz stated that this project is a
request for a Grant Deed to Pardee Homes for approximately 3.27 acres that is in accordance
with Government Code Section 65402. He stated that the Planning Commission must render
the report within 40 days from the date that the matter has been submitted. He stated that the
.' Agenda Item No. \
Page ~~ of lt~
PAGE 44 - PLANNING COMMISSIONMINUfES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
recommendation is to determine that the conveyance of the property by Grant Deed to Pardee
Homes is a disposition ofthe property inconformity with the City of Lake Elsinore General
Plan, and is to direct Staffto forward a copy ofthe report to City Council.
'-"
9:06:39 PM Chairman O'Neal requested the Commissioner's comments.
9:06:44 PM Commissioner LaPere concurred with Staff's recommendations.
9:06:50 PM Commissioner Gonzales concurred with Staff's reco
9:07:00 PM Vice Chairman Larimer concurred with Staff'
9:07:07 PM Chairman O'Neal concurred with Staff's
Motion.
......,
8.
e A artments".
t Director Preisendanz stated that this is a Residential
rs Edge Apartments and requested Project Planner
on.
9:08:32 PM Pr iller stated that this project would be on a seven (7) acre site,
to include nine opo buildings. She stated that the buildings would range in size
from 755 square fe ,055 square feet. She stated that each unit would have either a
balcony or court yar ith private yard open space area. She noted that the project would
include 58 enclosed garage spaces, a recreation room, pool and spa. She stated that the
architectural design would be Craftsman, complying with the requiring styles of the East
Lake Specific Plan. She indicated that the application would provide 35% landscaping and
six (6) foot high stone-faced pilasters with decorative metal fencing. She indicated that Staff
is recommending approval of this project based on the Findings, Exhibits, and Conditions of
Approval. She stated that the applicant is present to answer any questions that the
Commission may have.
Agenda Item No.
Page
~~ of
.....,
PAGE 45 - PLANNING CDMMISSION MINUfES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
~
9:11:36 PM Chairman O'Neal requested comments from the Public.
9:11:39 PM Drew Calquit, 24240 Main Street, Irvine stated that he is the partner/applicant for
the project. He stated he is very proud of developing in the City, and has enjoyed working
the Staff. He stated that Alliance is a developer of luxury multi-family communities across
the Western United States.
9:15:32 PM Commissioner Gonzales asked ifth
appealing. He stated
curred with Staff s
9:14:58 PM Chairman O'Neal requested Commissioners comm
9:15:06 PM Commissioner LaPere indicated that the proje
that it is a big plus to have affordable housing in e
recommendations.
9:15:39 PM Kelly Carlisle 3187 Redhill Avenue indic
units and they would be floating unit.
9:16:12 PM Commissioner Gonzales as
~
9:16:24 PM
e project should help significantly. She
City's Standards of 1,267.
asked the applicant on how far is the project from the
nzales asked the applicant where is the soil coming from.
stated that the soil would come from the basin.
9:18:21 PM Commissioner Gonzales asked if there would be an elevator, and would the
apartments be furnished.
9:18:26 PM Ms. Carlisle stated that the apartments would not be furnished, nor is there an
elevator.
~
Agenda item No. \
Page 4 5 of L.:~
PAGE 46 - PLANNING CD:MMISSION MINUTES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
9:18:54 PM Speaker (name is inaudible) stated that the stairs are wide enough to
accommodate moving in large pieces of furniture, etc.
....."
9:19:27 PM Commissioner Gonzales asked the applicant on how they intended on controlling
traffic issues, especially on Taylor Street where there is no exit.
9:20: 13 PM Speaker stated that there would be a full time 24-hour staff that would monitor
where the moving trucks would be parked.
9:21 :28 PM Commissioner Gonzales stated that it looks nice;
exit in and out of there.
9:22:09 PM Community Development Director Pr
pad elevations would be.
9:22:10 PM Speaker stated that the pad elevations ar
9:22:34 PM Vice Chairman Larimer
color choices. She commended the ap
any ofthe first floor units would be whe
9:23:53 PM Speaker stated that all first floo
....."
units would have larger door space,
a and bathroom as well as the recreation
no comments and requested the reading of the
LAPERE, SECONDED BY LARIMER, AND
PASSED B VOTE OF 4-0 ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO.
2006-20, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CA. ADOPTING
FINDINGS OF CONSISTANCY WITH SECTION 6.1.2 OF
MULTIBLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN FOR
THE PROJECT KNOWN AS BROADSTONE RIVERS EDGE
APARTMENTS.
Agenda Item No.
Page ~ b
\
~\
""""'"
of
PAGE 47 - PLANNING CDMMISSION MINlITES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
r-
MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY GONZALES, AND
PASSED BY VOTE OF 4-0 ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO.
2006-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CA. APPROVING
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-12 FOR THE
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF
BROADSTONE RIVERS EDGE APARTME A
RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT COMPLEX CONSI F A
184 TOTAL UNITS TO BE LOCATED WITH ANNING
AREA SIX (6) OF THE EAST LAKE SPEC APN:
373-210-001,373-222-001,005,006.
INFORMATIONAL
STAFF COMMENTS
None
----
None
ery te s evening and thanked Staff for their patience
Planning Commission worked through the issues
. eeting.
. Thanked Ir hard work on the projects that were presented at this meeting.
. She indicate t she would attend a conference in Riverside on Wednesday
February 22 will report any information that would be beneficial to the Planning
Commission at the next meeting.
Commissioner Gonzales commented on the following:
/""" '
. He wanted to advise the Commission that he would be attending the League of Cities
conference on March 22, 2006 which would mean that he would be unavailable to
attend the Planning Commission Meeting scheduled for the that night. \
Agenda Item No.
Page 4'\ of L. 'b
PAGE 48 - PlANNING CDMMISSION MINlITES -FEBRUARY 21,2006
Chairman O'Neal commented on the following:
. None.
ADJOURNMENT
9:29:35 PM THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS,
ADJOURNED THE MEETING ON FEBRUARY 21,20
Respectfully Submitted,
Dana C. Porche' for Lisa Alexen
Office Specialist III
ATTEST:
Agenda Item No.
\
4~
Page
~ 1 of
..."
"WfII'
"WfII'
~ ABSENT:
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
183 NORTH MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530
r---.
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman O'Neal called the Regular Planning Co
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Leonard Leichnitz led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
FLORES &
Office to Jimmy Flores as the new Planning
uced Deputy City Attorney Santana and indicated that she would be
Attorney Miles.
,..........
Agenda Item No. ~
Page \ of \ \
PAGE 2 - PLANNING CD:MMISSION MINUtES -APRIL 4,2006
'....,
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes
Commissioner Flores asked Staff if
project.
a. Regular Planning Commission Minutes of March
Chairman O'Neal pulled Item's No.2, 3, and 4 of the Cons
there were only a few questions that the Commission
necessary for Staff to read their reports.
2. Minor Desi n Review of a Sin
Street (APN: 379-202-017).
isconsin
er that applicant received
Conditions of Approval state
ty Fire Department for the fire .....,
Community Develop
Department re
adequate
ndicated that EVMWD and the Fire
of the fire hydrants and feels that there is
4.
that the residence at 418 E. Hill Street has the same issues.
Community Development Director Preisendanz indicated that this project belongs to Project
Planner Miller and referred the question to her.
Project Planner Miller stated that it is the same answer as the previous project. She stated
that the Water and Fire Department feel that this house has adequate fire protection.
Commission Flores asked about the sewer facilities in the area~
Agenda Item No. ~
Page d.- of '\
.....,
PAGE 3 - PLANNING CDMMISSION MINm'ES -APRIL 4,2006
r---
Josh Edwards, the applicant for the project stated that the sewer would be located in the alley
way at the rear of the project.
Commissioner Gonzales requested the percentage ofthe driveway.
Josh Edwards stated that the driveway would be less than 12%. He indicated that at the
lower section would almost be level.
4.
Commissioner Gonzales asked Community Development
houses must have fire sprinklers.
ye fire protection
- family home
Chairman O'Neal stated that before he can request fo
the drawings barely meet minimum st dards.
There being no further discussion, Chai
r---
3820 Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-10 and
05-11 for "Marina Villa e".
pened the Public Hearing.
Community Develop' nt Director Preisendanz indicated that this project is a request to
approve Tentative Condominium Map No. 33820, Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-10 and
Residential Design Review No. 2005-11 for Marina Village. He requested Senior Planner
Harris to review the project with the Commi~sion, and answer any questions that they may
have.
r---
Senior Planner Harris states that the item before the Commission is request for 46
condominium buildings and 92 individually owned condominium units with ~lated
Agenda Item No. ~
Page ) of \ \
PAGE 4 - PLANNING CDMMISSION MINUTES -APRIL 4,2006
improvements. He stated that it is on a 5.8 site on the north-east comer of Lakeshore Drive
and Spring Street.
"-'
Senior Planner Harris stated that the LEMC requires that a CUP is required in order to do a
condominium complex within the City. He stated that the project has been conditioned to
have an HOA which would be reviewed by the City Attorney.
Senior Planner Harris indicated that the Residential Design Rev'
condominium with garages in the rear of the project, 220 par
those are guest parking spaces. He stated that the project w
areas provided through-out the site. He noted that t
considered Spanish Eclectic style, with four (4) separat I
(5) separate floor plans. He stated that the project
with a pool, hot tub and restroom facilities. He st
this project based on the Findings, Exhibits, an
indicated that the applicant is present for any ques
noted that Condition No. 32 would need to be mo
record.
stru
perime
Departm
City in calc
the project,
a redevelopment
constructed in the
ce with quirements of Section
Redeve opment Law or as an
the City which may include
d, construction of affordable
ieu fee at the rate of $2.00 per
ace or h dwelling unit in the project. For
cessible space mean all the square footage
tial structure, not including any carport,
rhan patio, enclosed patio, detached accessory
ea. The amount of the square footage within the
ntial structure shall be calculated by the Building
the ity in accordance with the standard practice of the
structural perimeters.
"'"
Senior Planner Harris had no further comments.
Chairman O'Neal requested the applicant to approach the podium.
Daniel Gord, representing D.R. Horton thanked Staff for the support on the project.
Agenda Item No.
~
Page
~ of \\
"-'
/""""
PAGE 5 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -APRIL 4,2006
~hairman O'Neal asked Mr. Gord if he has read and agrees to the Conditions of Approval
mclude the amended Condition No. 32.
Mr. Gord stated "Yes".
Mr. Gord gave a brief overview of the project and indicated that they would be available for
any questions that the Commission may have.
chi t, stated that the project does not have all of the elements
odate some of the elements, such as anti-scalding devices, and
wider hallways. He ated that this is a three (3) story project that could have grab-bars
installed at the buyer request.
6:29: 13 PM Chairman O'Neal closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Gonzales asked ifthis is a gated Communi
Mr. Gord stated "No".
Commissioner Gonzales asked if these home
would sell for.
Mr. Gord stated "Around $250,000 -
Commissioner Gonzales asked Staff, wh
/""""
Mr. Gord indicated that it is a desk area tha
for an internet service.
te computers and is equipped
(lea of the courtyards, bridges, trails and the
ea that the developer likes to promote a
She asked the architect if he has incorporated the
Mr. Gord stated that they do have options available for the individual customer, those
particular ideas could be selected.
r--
Vice Chairman Larimer stated that it would be easier to accommodate items at the building
process rather than at a later date.
Agenda Item No.
~
Page
oS
of \ \
PAGE 6 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -APRIL 4,2006
...",
Vice Chairman Larimer asked about the current market value.
Gary Cunningham stated that mixing land uses is very complicated. He stated that given the
proximity location of this property next to the lake, it is set some distance from the
Commercial core. He stated that the area is a Residential Community. He stated that
interjecting a mixed use comes with certain problems, such as increased traffic. He stated
that D.R. Horton did not feel that this was a compatible use.
necessa
He stated t
design or acc
ADA issues.
""""
Vice Chairman Larimer asked Chairman O'Neal if this p
General Plan Advisory Meeting.
Chairman O'Neal stated "Yes".
Vice Chairman Larimer asked if this area w
something more substantial.
Chairman O'Neal stated that there
Committee about this particular use.
particular project is an exceptional pro]
Mayor Magee and both of them felt th
developed now. He stated that this project
Street, which would be by the Co
Vice Chairman L
Universal Design. .
ment Director Preisendanz about the
Preisen stated that the Universal Design must have a
equire a certain detail of construction techniques like
e City always looks at the building plans, but not
ated t it may slip through the cracks, if it is not conditioned.
ing Commission does not condition the project for interior
indicated that the Building Official would require addressing
Vice Chairman Lari r expressed that she feels that the City should be leaders and not
followers, instead of saying, "Well, it's not required".
Commissioner Flores asked the applicant if curbs, gutters, and a sidewalk would be placed on
the opposite side where the two existing homes are.
Mr. Gord stated "Yes".
Page
Agenda Item No.
b
~
of \\
....,
PAGE 7 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -APRIL 4, 2006
,r"'
Community Development Director Preisendanz stated that the General Plan cross-section
calls for both sides to have sidewalks.
Commissioner Flores noted that the existing sidewalk on Spring Street is cracked. He asked
if that area was included in the Conditions.
Mr. Gord stated "Yes".
Mr. Gord stated that he would agree
behind the curb and not into the street WI
Community Development Director Preisendanz stated onl
Commissioner Flores noted that the sidewalk and cross
enter line plus 12 feet
p accessible.
Commissioner Flores asked if the repairs would also include Li
City Engineer Seumalo stated that the City has m
was discussed. He stated that the City's
handicap access. He.stated that they did discuss 0
that it is not a requirement, however it has not been ru
e intersection
s about
s. He stated
~.
Community Development Director Preise
accomplished.
e was sure if this could be
Mr. Gord stated t
further.
they would meet with Staff to discuss
o look at the ADA requirements to make. sure that
at the time factor is.
ld be complete prior to occupancy.
Commissioner Flores had no further comments.
Chairman O'Neal informed Staff and the audience that he would need to re-open the Public
Hearing to allow the Public to comment for this project.
6:55:46 PM Chairman O'Neal opened the Public Hearing.
Agenda Item No.
~
.~
Page
\. of \ \
PAGE 8 - PLANNING CDMMISSION:MINUfES -APRIL 4, 2006
Mr. Hinkle, Grand Avenue, Lake Elsinore asked the projected time on construction.
.....,
Mr. Gord stated that the construction schedule (pending on City Council's approval) would
take between 8 to 10 months from today date.
Mr. Compose, Lake Elsinore asked if the view for the existing homes along Spring Street
would be jeopardized.
e indicated that the
d still be able to see the
Mr. Gord stated that the elevations on Spring Street are a combi
site would be lowered; however, there is no guarantee that y
lake along Spring Street.
6:59:04 PM Chairman O'Neal closed the Public Heari
Chairman O'Neal stated that what ever happe
what happens to the plan today.
,. effect on
Mr. Gord stated ~'Y es, we have a total 0
e stated that she can tell that
o see more of a landmark in that "'-'
ut feels it would pass anyway.
VED ONDED BY FLORES
SSE V F 3-1 WITH LARIMER
, A OLUTION OF THE PLANNING
N 0 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
AE OVING CONDITIONAL USE
2005-10 FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT
A VILLAGE" A RESIDENTIAL
IUM COMMUNITY, TO BE LOCATED
AT ORTHEAST CORNER OF LAKE SHORE
DRIV AND SPRING STREET, ASSESSOR PARCEL
NUMBER(S) 374-271-003, 004, 007, 013, 015 AND 016.
MOVED BY GONZALES, SECONDED BY FLORES
AND PASSED BY A 3-1 VOTE WITH LARIMER
OPPOSING, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
Page
Agenda Item No.
'b
~
of \\
.....,
PAGE 9 - PLANNING CDMMISSION MINUTES -APRIL 4 2006
,
~
CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
APPROVAL OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION NO. 2005-11 FOR MARINA
VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM
PROJECT.
",.--.
MOVED BY GONZALES, SECONDED BY
AND PASSED BY A 3-1 VOTE WITH L
OPPOSING, A RESOLUTION OF THE
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF L
CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE CO
NO. 33820 FOR "MARl
RESIDENTIAL CONDOMI
BE LOCATED AT THE NO
LAKESHORE DRIVE AND S
ASSESSOR P ARCE NUMBER(S)
007,013,015 AND 016.
BUSINESS ITEMS
None
tor Preisendanz commented on the followin :
· oner Larimer farewell and stated it was a pleasure working with
her. He noted th e would take all of her comments seriously.
. He thanked City Clerk Ray for taking the Minutes of the meeting.
· He welcomed Commissioner Flores to the Planning Commission.
City Engineer Seumalo commented on the following:
· He welcomed Commissioner Flores to the Commission.
Agenda Item No.
~
,,-..
Page , of \ \
PAGE 10 - PLANNING mMMISSIONMINUfES -APRIL 4, 2006
.
He also bid farewell to Commissioner Larimer, indicated that he had a good time while
she served as the Commissioner.
He welcomed Deputy City Attorney Santana.
""""
.
PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
Commissioner Flores commented on the following:
. He enjoyed working with Commissioner Larimer.
. He also thanked those who gave him the 0
Commissioner as well as the City Staff.
. He thanked Mr. Gord for the review of his
comments. He stated that his door is al
needs to be discussed.
.
.
.
""
.
He stated
on the followin :
. He welcomed mmissioner Flores to the Commission. He stated that he has known
Commissione Flores for many years, and agrees that he does in fact have an open-
door policy.
. He welcomed Deputy City Attorney Santana to the meetings, and looks forward to
working with her.
. He wished Commissioner Larimer farewell. He stated that she has made a strong
contribution to the City and has represented herself very well.
Agenda Item No.
~
Page
\0
of \ ,
""""
/"""'
PAGE 11 - PLANNING COMMISSIONMINUfES -APRIL 4, 2006
ADJOURNMENT
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, CHAIRMAN O'NEAL ADJOURNED
THE MEETING AT 7:14:14 PM ON APRIL 4,2006.
Respectfully Submitted,
Michael O'Neal, C
Dana C. Porche'
Office Specialist III
ATTEST:
/"'"'"
Rolfe Preisendanz,
Director of Commun'
Agenda Item No.
~
/'"""'-
Page
\\.
of \ \
......"
"'-""
"'-""
r'
MINUTES
Also present were:
Weiner, City En .
Associate Planner
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
183 NORTH MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530
TUESDAY, MAY 16, 2006
CALL TO ORDER:
6:05:16 PM Chairman O'Neal called the Regular Planning
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Commissioner Flores led the Pledge of Allegi
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
r-
No
CONSENT C
Chairman O'Neal r sted to pull Item No.3 and requested Community Development
Director Preisendanz< 0 discuss the project with the Commission.
3. Minor Desif!n Review of a 9.09 Acre Site
Community Development Director Preisendanz stated the applicant Castle & Cooke has
requested the Planning Commission to approve a building footprint and approve MSHCP
consistency for a 9.09 acre site located in AlberhilI Specific Plan. He stated that based on
~
Agenda Item No. "3
Page \ of \ 'd..
PAGE 2 - PLANNING CDMMISSIONWNlITES -MAY 16,2006
some comments from RCA, Staff has requested that this project be continued in order to get
more information for the Planning Commission.
....."
Chairman O'Neal requested a Motion.
Community Devel
requested the readin
MOVED BY FLORES, SECONDED BY GONZALES
AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 3-0, TO C INUE
MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A 9.09 ITE
LOCATED IN THE ALBERHILL SP PLAN,
APN: 390-130-017 TO THE JUNE 20," ULAR
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETI
1. Minutes
a.
Chairman O'Neal requested comments
There being no comments, Chairman 0'
Commission Minutes.
""
ened the Public Hearing.
Director Preisendanz introduced Senior Planner Harris and
the Staff Report.
Senior Planner Harris stated that this is a request for a Design Review of a two-story 10,000
square-foot medical office building within the Neighborhood Commercial zoning district of
the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan. He indicated that the primary access point
onsite shall be provided off of the private loop road which connects to Canyon Estates Drive.
He stated that the architectural style of the building would be classified as Contemporary
Mediterranean, which is consistent with the surrounding area. He stated that Staff has
Agenda Item No. 3
Page ~ of \ '\ ""
PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -MAY 16,2006
/'"'
worked with the Landscape Architect and proposed a unique tree palette to include Orange
Citrus and Mexican Avocado trees around the perimeter of the building along with, Queen
Palms.
Senior Planner Harris stated that Staff has determined that this project meets all the
requirements of the LEMC and recommends to the Planning Commission to approve and
recommend to the City Council; Commercial Design Review No. C 2005-08, based on the
Findings, Exhibits "A" through "G" and the Conditions of Appro He indicated that the
applicant is available for any questions.
~.
Chairman O'Neal requested the applicant to approach the
Mr. Lon Bike, 23905 Clinton Keith Road, Wildom
to the Conditions of Approval.
read and agrees
Chairman O'Neal requested any comments from tl1
There being no comments from the p
the dais.
Commissioner Flores requested the time
Mr. Bike stated that th
within one year.
and expects to be completed
which meets the City's Ordinance.
Co
how many offices would the building have.
5 offices, however that has not yet been determined.
Vice Chairman Gonz . s asked Mr. Bike what type of practice would be preformed.
Mr. Bike indicated that the Doctor is a General Practitioner.
Vice Chairman Gonzales noted that the plans only shows two handicap parking spaces and
may need more later.
Agenda Item No.
Page ')
~
of ,~
",...-
PAGE 4 - PLANNING CDMMISSIONMINUfES -MAY 16,2006
Mr. Bike stated that there are 4 handicap parking spaces and the project meets the ADA
requirements.
~
Vice Chairman Gonzales had no further comments.
Chairman O'Neal indicated that he concurs with Staffs recommendation, and had no further
comments.
6:19:09 PM Chairman O'Neal closed the Public Hearing and r
Resolution.
e the reading of the
.....,
earing and requested the reading of the Staff
Co
Parcel
questions t
endanz stated that this is a request for a Tentative
n anager Weiner to read the Staff Report and answer any
may have.
Planning Manag ted that the applicant is proposing to subdivide 2.23 acre parcel'
of land into four in 1 lots. He stated that the site is located on Kevin Place, north of
Grand Avenue. He 4f ted that the previous version of the map has been reconfigured to
eliminate the remainder lot that was previously shown. He indicated that parcel one reflects
the addition of an easement for access to an adjacent property's road-way. He stated that the
continuation of land identified as lot 6, shows what area lies beyond this subdivision.
Planning Manager Weiner stated that this is a recommendation of approval for the division of
land only. He indicated that the development of the lots and subsequent design would return
Page
~
~
of \~
.....,
Agenda Item No,
PAGE 5 - PLANNING CD:MMISSIONMINUfES -MAY 16, 2006
r'
back to the Planning Commission at a later date. He indicated that the applicant is available
for comments.
Chairman O'Neal requested the applicant to approach the podium.
Mr. Dean Wood, President of Custom Built Connection, Fullerton CA, indicated that he has
read and agrees to the Conditions of Approval.
Mr. Hugh
development.
indicated that he
easement plus a 10-
needs to build a hous
Chairman O'Neal called apon Mark Vezzani to approach the po
Mark Vezzani, Serena Shores Home-Owners Association
has a concern and stated that it appears that the remain r that
indicated was not on the map shown tonight. He al . a ed that
street size of Kevin Place.
in Place stated that he
. g Manager Weiner
concerns of the
Chairman O'Neal requested Mr. Wood to address
~
Mr. Wood stated that the remainder
using four lots and what is left over
design was to have a remainder lot and ]
that he would have to widen the street as
He stated that he would be
He stated that the original
ccess out. He indicated
elissa ayog representing Serena Shore
ake Elsinore stated that she is here to make
he indicated that they currently have a-
ment four s ago, and indicated that it is a constant
o requested a map with current changes, as
her to approach the podium.
rd Street, Lake Elsinore stated that he has a lot adjacent to the
at there is a 50-foot easement coming into his property. He
to . Wood and made a suggestion that he would give him a 12-foot
asement, which then brings that last lot up to the standard that he
Chairman O'Neal indicated that there are many issues that have not been resolved, and are
not included in the Staff Report. He requested Community Development Director
Preisendanz to address the issues.
~
Community Development Director Preisendanz stated that the map that is shown before the
audience is not the revised map. He indicated that the map that is included in the
Agenda Item No. ~
Page 5 of \ d....
PAGE 6 - PLANNING CDMMISSIONMINUfES -MAY 16, 2006
Commissioners packet is the revised map. He stated that the other issue is the remainder lot.
He indicated that the lot is not under the ownership of Mr. Woods, and would not be part of
the map. He stated that as far as parcel number one (1) he stated that there would be an
easement that would be maintained by the homeowner. Furthermore, he indicated that this is
just a Parcel Map. He indicated that the Design Review would come back to the
Commission.
"-"
Vice Chairman Gonzales indicated that
homes that would be built, belong to a ho
. g on. He asked if the
Chairman O'Neal asked if anyone else requested to speak either for
Corte Farmin, 32905 Kevin Place, Lake Elsinore requested
because of the surrounding areas within the community.
provision would enable cars to be parked both side oft s
Mr. Wood stated that the street widening is in ac
would be 60-feet wide with the sidewalks.
There being no further comments from the public,
back to the Commission for comment
,...,
Community Devel9
be annexed into the ex}
te that he could condition that the homes
what would be built on the four (4) parcels.
Co '
ndanz stated "That would be determined".
if there is a condition that discusses the easement.
Community Dev
on parcel one (1) an
rector Preisendanz stated that the easement shown on the map is
e maintained by the owner.
Mr. Wood stated that the easement is already a recorded easement. He stated that what is
important is that the easement is cleaned up. He stated that the road right now is dirt. He
stated that he would pave the easement in exchange for some tradeoffs.
Community Development Director Preisendanz stated that "What you see is what you get".
He stated that this map is four (4) parcels; it has an easement across parcel one (1) to be
maintained by the property owner.
Agenda Item No.
Page b
'3
of \ d..
.....,
PAGE 7 - PlANNING COMMISSIONMINUfES -MAY 16, 2006
~
Commissioner Flores asked if the map that was included in his packet was the same map in
front of the audience.
Planning Manager Weiner indicated that the map shown to the audience is an error. He
indicated that it is the old map, and not the revised map.
Commission Flores requested Mr. Woods to approach the podi
address the road easement and asked if the agreements that
placed in writing.
e asked if he would
de last night were
Mr. Woods stated that the agreements made would requ' e
Commissioner Flores asked Mr. Mosbacher state
you can't plant trees, you can't really landsc .
adjustment was made down the center of the drive
Commissioner Flores asked Ms. Laba
~
Ms. Labayog stated that she has alread
that basically are not be maintained by
review the revised map, that she would hav
ound the neighborhood
at if she had a chance to
view on this project.
Community Develop
he stated that this
their packets is the acc
tated that unfortunately it happened. Again
icated that what the Commission has in
able with approving the map as it is.
Chairman
meetin
Co
that the
being used
cloud the issu
not reviewed
recommendation ho
well as given to the
e of lii ncerns. He first commended the developer
to address everyone's concerns. He concurred with
, at the public has the correct information. He stated
he " ainder lot". He indicated that there is land that is not
but he still owns that property. He also indicated that it does
about the easement without it being written down on paper and
ission. He indicated that he would support Staff s
, the proper information should be up on the board the next time as
ic ahead of time.
Chairman O'Neal requested to hear from City Engineer Seumalo.
City Engineer Seumalo recommended to the Commission to strike Condition No. 28 which
references the remainder lot.
,,-.,
Page
Agenda Item No.
t
3
of \'}..
PAGE 8 - PLANNING CDMMISSIONMINUfES -MAY 16, 2006
Deputy City Attorney Santana stated that most of her comments have already been addressed
but did want to point out the nature of the easement is not actually the equivalent of a fee
simple interest. She stated that the easement is simply allowing ingress and egress, allowing
somebody to pass over the property. She stated that the underlying fee simple interest still
remains with the owner of parcel one. She indicated to the extent that parcel one's owner is
allowing people to access his property, the homeowner would still be required to maintain
that property according to Health and Safety Code's regulations and LEMC.
.-..If!
6.
the reading of the
6:52:44 PM Chairman O'Neal closed the Public Hearing and r
Resolution.
MOVED BY GONZALES, SECO
AND PASSED BY A VOTE
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-51, A
PLANNING COMMISSION
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
APPROVAL OF TE ATVIE P ARC
lexes located on Graham
......,
6:55:01 PM Chairm
Report.
. g and requested the reading ofthe Staff
Communi
reVIew
Wei
have.
eise indicated that this is request for a design
u lexes off Graham, and requested Planning Manager
and answer any questions that the Commission may
Planning Man Weiner. icated that this project is located on Graham Avenue south of
Main Street wit . .cal Downtown Zone District. He stated that the project meets
all of the minimum es set forth in the LEMC. He also noted that the project meets all
of the parking guid es. He stated that the applicant has chosen a Spanish Eclectic
architectural style for the project and are consistent with those outline in the Historical
Elsinore Guidelines. He indicated that the applicant is available for comments.
Chairman O'Neal requested the applicant to approach the podium. He asked the applicant if
he has read and agrees to the Conditions of Approval.
Agenda Item No.
Page b
)
of \d..
......,
PAGE 9 - PLANNING CDMMISSION MINUTES -MAY 16, 2006
~
Kim Quan, Architect for the project, indicated that he has noticed a few discrepancies. He
indicated that McElhinney who is the applicant has not received a copy of the Conditions of
Approval. He also indicated that the Assessor's Parcel numbers are not consistent and there
may be some address information that is not quite right.
Chairman O'Neal requested a five (5) minute recess so that the applicant can review the
Conditions of Approval..
Mr. Quan stated that
properties. He indic
have equal distalll
neighborhood of 50 fee
6:57:50 PM Chairman O'Neal called for a five (5) minute break.
7:05:45 PM Chairman O'Neal reconvened the meeting.
Chairman O'Neal asked Mr. Quan ifhe agrees to the
Mr. Quan stated "Yes". He stated that the
indicates that the address is on Graham Avenue an
enda also
Chairman O'Neal requested asked if.
There being none, Chairman O'Neal b
~ Vice Chairman Gonzales requested c1arifi
ines ar ot equally spaced through the
o is to a ~ust the property lines so that you
A venue and that is becomes in the
e four lots.
Co
looks good, and had no further comments.
losed the Public Hearing and requested a Motion.
~
MOVED BY GONZALES, SECONDED BY FLORES
AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 3-0, TO ADOPT
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-52, A RESOLUTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF RESIDENTIAL
DESIGN REVIEW FOR FOUR (4) RESIDENTIAL
Page
~
~
of \1
Agenda Item No.
PAGE 10 - PLANNING CDMMISSIONMINUI'ES -MAY 16, 2006
DUPLEX UNITS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
GRAHAM APN 373-046-006 THROUGH 373-046-009.
......",
BUSINESS ITEMS
7. General Plan Conformity Determination for Proposed Street Vacation of Flint
Street.
8.
quest from a property
right-of-way. He
uestions that the
Chairman O'Neal requested the reading of the Staff Report.
Community Development Director Preisendanz indicated
owner on an adjacent lot to street vacation a portio
requested City Engineer Seumalo to read the Staff
Commission may have.
City Engineer Seumalo stated that the portion 0
Street and the southerly portion has previously been
the area have access to public streets.
Chairman O'Neal asked for comments
There being no comments from the Commi
......",
ination for Pro osed Street Vacation of Old
e reading of the Staff Report.
Community Develo irector Preisendanz stated that this is a request to street vacation
an old right-of-way ong Railroad Canyon Road and request City Engineer Seumalo to
review it with the Commission.
City Engineer Seumalo indicated that this project consists solely of considering the proposed
vacation of the old Railroad Canyon Road alignment.
Chairman O'Neal asked for comments from the Commission.
Agenda Item No.
Page \ 0
~
of \~
,.....,
PAGE 11- PLANNING CO:MMISSIONMINUfES -MAY 16, 2006
/"""
There being no comments from the Commission, a Roll Call Vote was requested.
Commissioner Flores: Aye
Vice Chairman Gonzales: Aye
Chairman O'Neal: Aye
STAFF COMMENTS
the Commission an update on Capital
t the City by answering any questions that
nt item at have come up. He stated that the item for
-1' e blowout on Railroad Canyon Road and the City
the detour is still in effect and EVMWD would pave
y on week.
Franklin and Auto Center Drive would be going under
n Thursday and would continue for approximately six (6)
INFORMATIONAL
None
.
/'"'"' .
Cit
.
on
. He als
constructi
weeks.
SIONER COMMENTS
Commissioner Flores commented on the.following:
. He requested Staff to have the correct maps shown for the audience and the correct
information.
/'"'"'
Agenda Item No. "?,
\'- of \a..
Page
PAGE 12 - PLANNING COMMISSIONMINUfES -MAY 16,2006
. He requested information regarding the meeting scheduled for May 17, 2006.
Community Development Director Preisendanz indicated that the meeting is
regarding the Public Scoping regarding the Annexation of an area off Highway 74.
He indicated that all Planning Commissioners and City Council are invited to come,
however it is not mandatory.
. He asked Staff on what the time frame is for the applicants to review the Conditions
of Approval. Planning Manager Weiner stated that the applicants are mailed via FED-
EX at the time that the agenda packets are delivered to the issioners.
'-'
Vice Chairman Gonzales commented on the following:
. He stated that he recently visited Alaska fo
new design review projects. He indica
present to the Governor of Alaska to s
He noted that the Planner who designed
School.
ow they review
d would be
of Alaska.
escal High
Chairman O'Neal commented on the fo
. None
....,
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
Dana C. Porche'
Office Specialist III
ATTEST:
Rolfe Preisendanz,
Director of Community Development
Agenda Item No.
Page \ ')..
3
of , )..,
'--'
r---
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
TO:
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE:
JUNE 6, 2006
PREPARED BY:
JUSTIN CARLSON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
PROJECT TITLE:
MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-F AMIL Y
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1121 MILL ST. (APN:
373-094-003)
APPLICANT:
TEODORO PEREZ: 223 S. PALM AVENUE,
RIALTO, CA 92376
r---
OWNER:
SAME
PROJECT REQUEST
The applicant is requesting design review consideration for a conventionally built
single- family dwelling unit pursuant to Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14
(Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.23 (R-l Single-Family Residential
District), and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code (LEMC).
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
./'"'
Project
Site
North
South
East
West
Vacant
Vacant
Residential
Vacant
S ecific Plan K
Low Medium Densi
Specific Plan K
Specific Plan K
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE \
~
OF a\
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006 ~
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1121 MILL ST. (APN: 373-
094-003)
PROJECT LOCATION
The approximately .11 acre vacant site is located on the north side of Mill Street,
approximately 200-feet west of Avenue 5 and within Specific Plan K (Country Club
Heights #2). More specifically, the property is located within the R-l (Single-Family
Residential District land use area, Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 373-094-003.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting design review consideration for the design and
development of a 1,390 square-foot single-family residence with an attached 452
square-foot two (2) car garage.
The total building footprint including the residence and garage is approximately 1 ,842 ~
square-feet. The existing lot has a net lot area of 4,925 square-feet, excluding the
required five-foot (5' -0") dedication on the front and rear (along Mill and Pell Street)
of the subject property. The proposed structure will have a net lot coverage of
approximately ~ percent ( %) and is in compliance with Section 17.23.090
(Lot Coverage) of ~EMC, which uthorizes one (1) dwelling unit per lot.
--rlt iv-+y -.>eveV\ 1
Architecture ?
The applicant has chosen to construct the proposed single-family residence using
elements similar to Craftsman style architecture. The front elevation, visible from Mill
Street, will include; decorative vents located on all roof dormers, decorative coach
lights on either side of the garage and at the front entry-door, and flagstone veneer
placed on the front comers of the residence. In addition, the applicant proposes to
install double entry-doors with inlaid windows with mullions and decorative trim on
either side.
On the rear (south) elevation, which is visible from Pell Street, the applicant will
include a decorative flagstone veneer on both comers of the house and a craftsman
style vent under the roof dormer. Furthermore, the applicant is proposing to install
AGENDA ITEM U
PAGE~OF~
....,
r--
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY
, RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1121 MILL ST. (APN: 373-
094-003)
complete window surrounds and decorative coach lights on either side of the double
rear doors that egress to the rear yard. In addition to the decorative architecture
applied to the house and pursuant to Section 17.14.080 of the LEMC, the applicant will
install a decorative block wall six-feet (6' -0") in height along the rear property line and
directly adjacent to Pell Street.
On the interior elevations (west and east elevations), the applicant is also proposing to
incorporate decorative window surrounds that are present on both the front and rear
elevations. Furthermore, the applicant will install wall returns of decorative block with
architecturally constructed gates on either side of the residence. It should be noted that
the decorative wall returns will aesthetically match the wall located on the rear
property line and directly adjacent to Pell Street. Finally, the proposed roofing
material will be comprised of concrete shake.
r---
Landscaping
Front yard landscaping will be installed and will include an automatic irrigation system
and a rain sensor, which will assist in the conservation of water. The proposed
landscaping will include two (2) 24" and 36" Bop Palms, New Zealand Flax, one (1)
IS-gallon Bouquia, and abundant amounts of five (5) gallon accent shrubs along the
front of the house. It should be noted that the applicant will provide one IS-gallon
street tree for each thirty-lineal feet (30') of street frontage for compliance with the
City of Lake Elsinore Landscape guidelines. All proposed street tree(s) will be
selected from the approved street tree list.
Aside from the six-foot (6'-0") decorative block wall returns on both sides of the
dwelling unit, the applicant proposes to install a garden wall approximately thirty-six
inches (36") inches in height from finish grade that extends to the front of the property.
Furthermore, the applicant will include a stained concrete driveway and walkway up to
the front-entry door.
/'"'
AGENDA ITEM 4
PAGE20F~\
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006 .....,
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1121 MILL ST. (APN: 373-
094-003)
Color and Materials
Roof
Walls
Roof & Window
surrounds
Comer Quoins
Ponderosa
X -39 Mirador
Lonely Road
Concrete Shake by Eagle Products
La Habra Stucco
Dunn Edwards (DE6l46LRV 19)
Buckskin
El Dorado Stone
BACKGROUND
On April 6, 2006 the Design Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the proposed plans
and provided several substantive comments on the proposed architectural design,
building massing, fencing along the right-of-ways on the front and rear of the subject
property, and landscaping. The DRC recommended that the applicant revise the
architecture to incorporate elements that are consistent with the selected style of
architecture. Once revised, the applicant re-submitted plans along with building
elevations that indicate that the DRC's recommendations were fully incorporated into
the project.
.~
ANALYSIS
Staffhas reviewed the project and found that with the attached conditions of approval,
the project meets all minimum requirements of Chapter 17.82 (Design Review),
Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.23 (Single-Family
Residential), and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code (LEMC), including, but not limited to; density, setbacks, landscaping,
parking, private open space, and lot coverage.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15303(a) (New
Construction of Small Structures), staffhas determined that the proposed project will
AGENDA ITEM lL
PAGE~OF -.D
...,
,r-,
r--
r--
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1121 MILL ST. (APN: 373-
094-003)
not have a significant affect on the environment and shall therefore be exempt from the
provisions of CEQA. Therefore no additional environmental clearance is necessary.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff requests that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2006-_ approving
the proposed residential dwelling unit based on the following Findings, Exhibits, and
the proposed Conditions of Approval.
FINDINGS
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the
intended General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project will be
located.
The proposed Residential Design Review for a proposed single-family residence
located at 1121 Mill Street (APN: 373-094-003) complies with the goals and
objectives of the General Plan designation Specific Plan K. Specific Plan K is
comprised of 161 acres and is intended to provide a range of densities and some
limited commercial and industrial uses. The approval of this single-family
dwelling unit will assist in achieving the development of a well-balanced and
functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational
and institutional land uses by providing additional affordable housing within
the City of Lake Elsinore, as well as encouraging the development and
maintenance of a broad range of housing types for all income groups and age
categories. It should be noted that the proposed dwelling unit, which
incorporates Craftsman styles architecture; will provide a well rounded design
while maintaining the desirable rural characteristics and base framework to
achieve quality an compatibility in the physical design of the developing
portions of the City, and to enhance existing developed areas within Specific
Plan K.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060
and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
AGENDA ITEM L.
PAGE 2 OF].J
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006 ~
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1121 MILL ST. (APN: 373-
094-003)
The proposed Residential Design Review located at 1121 Mill Street (APN: 373-
094-003) is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the
single-family dwelling unit has been provided; twenty foot (20') front yard and
rear yard setbacks; sufficient front yard landscaping and safe and sufficient on-
site vehicular circulation. Further, the project as proposed will complement the
quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-
detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects in that the
applicant is providing elements of Craftsman style architecture with various
architectural elements, such as 360-degree decorative window surrounds;
Craftsman style roof-dormer vents, coach lights, and flagstone veneer building
corners supporting this design. In addition, the applicant is providing a variety
of colors and materials which include Lahabra stucco painted beige
"Mirador"; columns and window surrounds painted with a "Lonely Road"
Dunn Edwards base and corner quoins EI Dorado flagstone with a "Buckskin"
color. In addition, the applicant will include a "Ponderosa" concrete shake tile ~
roof
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not
anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed
Residential Design Review to be located at 1121 Mill Street (APN: 373-094-
003), as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City Divisions,
Departments and Agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment
pursuant to Article 19; (Categorical Exemptions) and Section 15303 (a), Class
3; (New Construction of Small Structures).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code,
including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been
incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of
the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed Residential Design Review
located at 1121 Mill Street (APN: 373-094-003) has been scheduled for
consideration and approval of the Planning Commission. The project has also '""""'"
been conditioned to comply with the LEMG. For example, Condition of
AGENDA ITEMU
PAGELOF~
~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1121 MILL ST. (APN: 373-
094-003)
Approval Number 8 has been incorporated which states; Hall site improvements
shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations, with
revisions as noted herein. The applicant shall meet all required setbacks and
development standards pursuant to Section 17.23 (R-1 Single-Family
Residential District). Any revisions to the Minor Design Review attached hereto
shall be processed in a similar manner as the original Minor Design Review. All
plans submitted for building division plan check shall conform to the submitted
plans as modified by the Conditions of Approval".
PREPARED BY:
JUSTIN CARLSON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
~
APPROVED BY:
t2a7z
Rolfe M. Preisendanz,
Director of Community Development
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Planning Commission Resolution
3. Planning Commission Conditions of Approval
4. Preliminary Site Plan
5. Preliminary Landscape Plan
4. Floor Plan
5. Roof Plan
6. Building Elevations
~
AGENDA ITEM iL
PAGE~OF~
VICINITY MAP
MINOR DESIGN REVIEW
1121 MILL STREET
PELL 5T
PROJECT SITE
MILL 5T
v
ill
:J
Z
ill
~
PLANNING COMMISSION
~
I{)
ill
:J
Z
ill
~
......",
I{)
ill
:J
Z
ill
~
~
AOENDA ITEM NO. L.
PAOE Z) OF ~
".-.
RESOLUTION NO. 2006- S3
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY
DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
MILL STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 200-FEET WEST OF
AVENUE 5 AT 1121 MILL STREET (APN: 373-094-003).
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by
Teodoro Perez, requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for a single-family
dwelling unit located on the north side of Mill Street and approximately 200-feet
west of Avenue 5 at 1121 Mill Street pursuant to Chapter 17.82 (Design Review),
Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.23 (Single-Family
Residential), Chapter and 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code (LEMC); and;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has
been delegated with the responsibility of approving Minor Design Review requests
for residential projects; and
".-.
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given and the
Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with
respect to this item on June 6, 2006.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE,
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed
design for the single-family residence and has found it acceptable. The Planning
Commission finds and determines that this project is consistent with the LEMC
and is exempt from further environmental clearance under Section 15303, Class
3(a) (New Construction of Small Structures), of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA).
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of
the LEMC, the following findings for the approval of the project have been made
as follows:
/'"""'"
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the
intended General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project will be
located. I-\~ENDA ITEM NO. ~
PACE ~ OF 1.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
PAGE20F4
The proposed Residential Design Review for a proposed single-family
residence located at 1121 Mill Street (APN: 373-094-003) complies with the
goals and objectives of the General Plan designation Specific Plan K.
Specific Plan K is comprised of 161 acres and is intended to provide a range
of densities and some limited commercial and industrial uses. The approval
of this single-family dwelling unit will assist in achieving the development of
a well-balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial,
open space, recreational and institutional land uses by providing additional
affordable housing within the City of Lake Elsinore, as well as encouraging
the development and maintenance of a broad range of housing types for all
income groups and age categories. It should be noted that the proposed
dwelling unit, which incorporates Craftsman styles architecture; will
provide a well rounded design while maintaining the desirable rural
characteristics and base framework to achieve quality an compatibility in
the physical design of the developing portions of the City, and to enhance
existing developed areas within Specific Plan K.
2. The project complies with the design directives cont~ined in Section
17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The proposed Residential Design Review located at 1121 Mill Street (APN:
373-094-003) is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in
that the single-family dwelling unit has been provided; twenty foot (20 ')
front yard and rear yard setbacks; sufficient front yard landscaping and safe
and sufficient on-site vehicular circulation. Further, the project as proposed
will complement the quality of existing development and will create a
visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and
existing projects in that the applicant is providing elements of Craftsman
. style architecture with various architectural elements, such as 360-degree
decorative window surrounds, Craftsman style roof-dormer vents, coach
lights, and flagstone veneer building corners supporting this design. In
addition, the applicant is providing a variety of colors and materials which
include Lahabra stucco painted beige "Mirador"; columns and window
surrounds painted with a "Lonely Road" Dunn Edwards base and corner
quoins El Dorado flagstone with a "Buckskin" color. In addition, the
applicant will include a "Ponderosa" concrete shake tile roof
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not
anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed
Residential Design Review to be located at 1121 Mill Street (APN: 373-094-
003), as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City Divisions,
Departments and Agencies, will not have a significant effect on the
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~
PAGE \0 OF 1.
"""
...,
"'"""'"
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
PAGE 3 OF4
~
~
environment pursuant to Article 19; (Categorical Exemptions) and Section
15303 (a), Class 3; (New Construction of Small Structures).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning
Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions,
have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure
development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter
17.82.
Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed Residential Design
Review located at 1121 Mill Street (APN: 373-094-003) has been scheduled
for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission. The project
has also been conditioned to comply with the LEMC. For example,
Condition of Approval Number 8 has been incorporated which states; Hall
site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site
plan and elevations, with revisions as noted herein. The applicant shall meet
all required setbacks and development standards pursuant to Section 17.23
(R-1 Single-Family Residential District). Any revisions to the Minor Design
Review attached hereto shall be processed in a similar manner as the
original Minor Design Review. All plans submitted for building division
plan check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by the
Conditions of Approval ".
SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 2006, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
~
ACENDA ITEM NO.
PACE \ \
~
OF Q.1
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
PAGE40F4
ATTEST:
Rolfe Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
"'-'"
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
....."
....."
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~
PAGE \ J... OF 'l"t
/"'""'
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FORA MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF MILL STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 200-FEET WEST OF
AVENUES (APN: 373-094-003).
Note: Fees listed in the Conditions of Approval are the best estimates available at
the time of approval. The exact fee amounts will be reviewed at the time of permit
issuance and may be revised.
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials,
officers, employees, and/or agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against
the City, its officials, officers, employees, or agents concerning the project
attached hereto, which action is brought forward within the time period
provided for in California Government Code Section 65009 and Public
Resources Code Section 21167.
r' 2. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final ten (10) days from the
date of the decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Council
pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.80 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code.
3. If the project proposes an outdoor storage tank, the applicant shall locate the
. unit within the side or rear yards. If location must be within the front yard, the
applicant shall provide a method of screening subject to the review and
approval of the Director of Community Development or his designee.
PLANNING DIVISION
4. Minor Design Review approval of a single-family dwelling unit located at 1121
Mill Street (APN: 373-094-003) will lapse and become void one (1) year of the
approval date unless a building permit is issued and construction commenced
and diligently pursued toward completion.
5. All Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced upon page one of building
plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division for Plan Check. All
,,--. Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy and release of utilities.
AGENDA 'TEM NO. 4
PAGE \ ~ OF _Q.l.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF MILL STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 200-FEET WEST OF
AVENUE 5 (APN: 373-094-003).
"-'
6. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall sign and
complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions," and shall return the executed
original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case
records.
7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall obtained and
submit a "will serve" letter from Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District to
the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. The "will serve"
letter shall spe~ifically indicate the specific water flow volumes for both
domestic and fire protection water supply.
8. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site
plan and elevations, with revisions as noted herein. The applicant shall meet all
required setbacks and development standards pursuant to Section 17.23 (R-I
Single-Family Residential). Any revisions to the Minor Design Review attached ,..."
hereto shall be processed in a similar manner as the original Minor Design
Review. All plans submitted for Building Division plan check shall conform to
the submitted plans as modified by the Conditions of Approval.
9. All materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used
unless modified by the applicant and approved by the Community Development
Director or designee.
1 O.All windows shall use foam surrounds and/or other architectural-type features
approved by the Community Development Director or designee.
II.All roofing materials shall have a minimum Class "A" Fire rating, and so noted
on the construction plans.
12. The Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances.
13.A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers placed
on the site and used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal
of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to the
approval of the Community Development Director or designee.
~
ACENDA ITEM NO. 4
PACE \~ OF l,
~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF MILL STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 200-FEET WEST OF
AVENUE 5 (APN: 373-094-003).
14.The Applicant shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. Construction
activity shall be limited to the hours of 7 :00 AM to 5 :00 PM, Monday through
Friday, and no construction activity shall occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal
holidays.
15. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading
Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in
accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using
accepted control techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be
provided thirty (30) days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City
Engineer.
16.Any exterior air conditioning or other mechanical equipment shall be ground
/'"' mounted and screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property or
public streets. Air conditioning units and related equipment may not encroach
more than two-feet (2') into the required minimum side yard setback.
17. Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum interior clear space of
twenty feet (20') x twenty feet (20') for two cars.
18.The Applicant shall plant twenty-four inch (24") box street trees on center
(o.c.), selected from the City street tree list, a maximum of thirty-feet (30')
apart and along all street frontages. Planting is subject to the approval of the
Community Development Director of designee, prior to the issuance of
Certificate of Occupancy.
19. The Applicant shall provide shrubs and plant materials as shown on the
landscape plan. Any changes to this plan shall be subject to the approval of the
Community Development Director or designee. The landscape plan
improvements and plantings shall be fully installed prior to issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
,,-, 20.Planting within fifteen-feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than
thirty-six inches (36").
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4
PAGE \ S OF ~l ~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF MILL STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 200-FEET WEST OF
AVENUE 5 (APN: 373-094-003).
......,
21. The Applicant shall provide an irrigation system for landscaped areas on site as
shown on the landscape plans. The irrigation system shall be fully installed and
operational prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
22. The Applicant shall provide a rain sensor as shown on the landscape plan. The
rain censor shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
23.All exposed slopes in excess of three-feet (3') in height shall have permanent
irrigation system and erosion control vege!ation installed, as approved by the
City's Landscape Architect. A Planting and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted,
approved and planted prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Fees
are required for review of plans and inspections.
24.Driveways shall be constructed of concrete per Building and Safety Division
standards.
,.....",
25.All Walls or fences located in any front yard shall not exceed thirty-six inches
(36") in height with the exception that wrought-iron fences may be five-feet (5')
in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited.
26.All walls and/or fencing need to be located off the property line. If the
Applicant proposes to place any walls and/or fencing on the property line
he/she must submit a notarized agreement between the subject property owner
and the adjacent property owner to the Planning Department prior to
installation.
27.The applicant shall construct the City's Standard six-foot (6') high wood fence
along the side property lines. Where views exist, the applicant shall have the
option of constructing a tubular steel fence. The applicant shall be required to
remove and replace any existing chain link fencing and any fencing that is in
poor condition. It will be the responsibility of the applicant to contact the
effected neighboring property owners. If the existing fencing is in good
condition, this requirement may be waived per the approval of the Community
Development Director or Designee.
.,.....",
ACENDA ITEM NO. 4
. \.PAOE '6 OF 1.1.
,-..-.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF MILL STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 200-FEET WEST OF
AVENUE 5 (APN: 373-094-003).
28.The building address shall be a minimum of four inches (4") high and shall be
easily visible from the public right-of-way. Care shall be taken to select colors
and materials that contrast with building walls or trim.
29. The Applicant shall provide a flat concrete pad a minimum of 3'- 0" by 7'- 0"
adjacent to each dwelling unit. The storage pad for trash barrels shall be
concealed from public view.
30.The Applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore
Unified School District have been paid prior to issuance of building permits.
31. The Applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees in effect at the time prior to issuance
of building permits.
",-
32.The Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities.
33.The Applicant shall pay the Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee
(MSHCP) Local Development Mitigation Fee of $1,651.00 (fee for density less
than 8 du/ac) prior to obtaining building permits.
34. The Applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $64.00 made payable to
the County of Riverside for a Notice of Exemption. The check shall be
submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the
projects approval.
35.The Applicant shall pay all applicable Library Capital Improvement Fund fee.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
GENERAL
",- 36.A grading plan signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer
shall be required if the grading exceeds fifty (50) cubic yards or the existing
flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. If the
grading is less than fifty (50) cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~
PAGE \ t OF :1.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF MILL STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 200-FEET WEST OF
AVENUE 5 (APN: 373-094-003).
..."
grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern
inspection can be conducted before grading begins.
37.An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work on City right-of-
way.
38.All arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles,
vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the
property owner or his agent.
39.The Applicant shall provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by
Riverside County Fire.
40.In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal &
recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for ...,.
removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish
generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of
construction.
41.All on-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent
property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage
easement.
42.All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or
shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer.
43.The Applicant shall protect all downstream properties from damages caused by
alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concentrations or diversion of flow.
Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities
including enlarging existing facilities and/or by securing a drainage easement.
A maintenance mechanism shall be in place for any private drainage facilities
constructed on-site or off-site. Any grading or drainage onto private off site or
adjacent property shall require a written permission to grade and/or a
permission to drain letter from the affected landowner. '-'
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE \ 'b
l
OF ~l.
".........
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF MILL STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 200-FEET WEST OF
A VENUE 5 (APN: 373-094-003),:
44.All on-site drainage including roof drains should be directed to a landscaped
area.
45.Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided
to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as
well as other environmental awareness education materials on good
housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality and
met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES
Drainage Area Management Plan. (Required for lot of one acre or more)
46. The City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management
and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local
storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system
r- or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing
oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm
water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures
are available at City Hall.
PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain
system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or
waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law.
Prior to Issuance of a Gradine: Permit
47.If a grading plan is required, the Developer shall submit Soils Report,
Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer for
approval by the City Engineer. The Developer shall mitigate any flooding
and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or diversion
of drainage.
48. The site plan or grading plan shall show natural drainage conveyed through the
site, or collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer.
r-
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~
PAGE ,'\ OF '1\.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF MILL STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 200-FEET WEST OF
AVENUE 5 (APN: 373-094-003).
'-"
49.The Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading
and/or drainage acceptance from the adjacent property owners prior to grading
permit issuance.
50.The Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan.
The Applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the
goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage
Area Management Plan.
51.The Applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a Notice of
Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program with a storm water pollution
prevention plan prior to issuance of grading permits.
Prior to Issuance of BuUdin!! Permit
....."
52.If the grading is less than fifty (50) cubic yards and a grading plan is not
required, a site plan that shows proposed project improvements and drainage
patterns shall be submitted so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern
inspection can be conducted before grading begins.
53.All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of
development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to
building permit.
54. The Applicant shall Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering
Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer
arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for
the water service at the location. such as water pressure and volume etc.
Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit.
55.The Applicant shall provide in-lieu payment for future half-width street
improvements on Mill Street prior to building permit (Res. 86-35). Dedicate a
five-foot (5') street right-of-way on Mill Street such that the centerline to
property line is thirty-feet (30').
'-"
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4
PAGE ~O OF Q.l
,,--
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF MILL STREET AND APPROXIMA TEL Y 200-FEET WEST OF
AVENUE 5 (APN: 373-094-003).
56. The Applicant is to provide an AC pavement transition from the driveway to the
existing ac on Mill Street.
57. The Applicant is to provide in-lieu payment for future half-width street
improvements on Pell Street prior to building permit (Res. 86-35). The
Applicant shall dedicate a five-foot (5') street right-of-way on Pell Street such
that the centerline to property line is thirty (30').
58.The Applicant is to provide a public street light mounted on the Edison wood
pole located across the project site.
59.The Applicant is to pay all Development Impact Fees and Plan Check fees
(LEMC 16.34).
,,--
Prior to Occupancy
60.The Applicant is to pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment
permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of public works
improvements (LEMCI2.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an
encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy.
61.All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie
notes delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering
Division.
,
62.All public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved
plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
63.All water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with
Water District requirements.
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
,,--
64. The Applicant is to pay park fees of $1 ,600 per unit.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4
PACie ~ \ OF &\.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF MILL STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 200-FEET WEST OF
AVENUE 5 (APN: 373-094-003).
~
65.The Applicant will be required to participate in the "Public Facility" fee
program.
66. The Applicant shall participate III the City-wide Lighting, Landscape
Maintenance District (LLMD).
67. The Applicant is to comply with all City Ordinances regarding construction
debris removal and recycling as per Section 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code.
LAKE ELSINORE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
68.Under the provisions of SB 50, the owner or developer will be required to pay
school fees or enter into a mitigation agreement prior to the issuance of a
certificate of compliance by the district. '-'
LAKE ELSINORE POLICE DEPARTMENT
69. The Applicant shall provide assurances, prior to building permit, that all
requirements of the Lake Elsinore Police Department have been met.
ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
70. The Applicant shall request a "will server" letter.
.....,
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4
PAGE d~ OF 1.,
/'"
/'"
/'"
."
;ij
'"
I
d
;0
)>
Z
--<
w.
:=3
trl
'"'d
t"""'
;J>
Z
g~~~~~~~
;~~~~~a"V
;:;:j~~:t:r;r:~~
~JTt~~~~>~
~8:::~~t2~~
~~g~~5~~
~~rlteog~F
~ogo~~~?;;g
IIlgo8. ~;;;~
~Q:g~g~
~~g~g~~
~ Qg~~.'
6 gz M
z z ~
()
!;;
!.
a>
.!'.
~
'"
U) J,"
I
i
Z
!?
\s:
e
,--\
~
~~
'"
."
--<
o
'"
o
n
)>
--<
6
Z
roz
.r<1
g:;;
"''''
0.
~Z
'0
'r<1
()
o
;0
)>
--<
~
r<1Z
.,.,
~:;;
,,'"
~8
r<1)>
n",
"
roz
'r<1
g:;;
"''''
."
:;;--<
)>0
~8
o
;0
)>
--<
~
<::;0
)> fTl
(}Ul
)>0
ZfTl
-1Z
---1
)>
,-
Z
'"
:;;
"
;0
o
m"
.0
/Q8
/ f5
--,-' '8
1- I ~
I ::;
:: ~
I
rCl
U
fTl
,-
,-
mz
or<1
g:;;
"''''
0.
~Z
Fg
()
o
;0
)>
-<
~
lDZ
.'"
g:;;
"'0.
.."
:;;--<
)> 0 ,--
F~ :
f--------~-------~
, )>
, --<
I ·
Ul
---1
::;0
fTl
fTl
--j
::;0
fTl
Ul
- ::;0
O~
fTl
Z
()
fTl
o
r<1
o
n
)>
--<
6
Z
Z "
'" ~
:E ~.
~ ~
III
g
Z
"
r<1
"
"
C>Z"'-lC)-lG)Z )> <ZlIl -IN)>Q " )>0 Z
:::0,..,00):0.0:::01""1 ~ )>"'" ~O,," I 0,", =i
0-10-1;0-10-1 0:;;0 l'Tl~~g 0 Oz -<
~b~~~~fgb )> )> " ~ ;0", ~!,-,;---:y> Z
Z III r<1 "" -U r<1;o 0 '"
I--IZ;o:MCr-t 0 -lZO ~~~~ (I).. ~g~~~ r<1 )>
)> v.> X -U
~8..~?O~8~ 0 9~~ o "'"
0 ~~glf
>~ ~~(;)~~ F <O~~~ <....,."c:
..,,0 )> r-3::-c
~~ ~11~~1l )> )>;0 ~f!2""::;u ~,~,U. :::j-oOZ'
=' "'''' :::OfTl1i.,ol ~~~ ~~
1i~ M ~" 0 ;= c 0'-. '-'<3!J>r;1
Z O...."OC UlZ-o-<
II 5; II U> -< --1>(..1__ ....- 0
r<1 ;0 O~ ~~~~ ~>
)> '" Z. Zz
" (I) ..-< u<<>.3:o
6 '-",,-, 0
'" < ou)>-o (I)
Z Z <<>,,<1"'1 0
Vt.-"...........,t:...............~ f;1 0."';0 )>
......,.........(X)Q:I()1UW...... Z,., ~
~Nt;t"'->~~~ 0 ~N ;!!
~~~~~~ Z
)> )>
Z
~
~
'"
...
P'P
i! l ~
ill
U>!?
~~
;!2~'
)>-<
Z;:o:
~
.-
)>-
?:i~
~~
<no
Z'
'il<n
!";a
~6
i"
;ot-.J3::0
....l'..l:::O:e
r 01' ~
pYl~~
0-0:::]
)>1'=
",'"
~~
'"
",Sf" Bill
~;E ~ D
!" ~o
f~~tzj
g~fi~
..,z~3~
Ol;lll~Z
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE ~ ')
4
OF_ ~l
l
'"
-.,
-<
o
M
o
<>
,.
='
o
z
Z
M
::;;
"
"
o
W"
rO
/Rg
::;;en
~~
ro
M
C>
- -, 0
___n__-:,- /"l\ : ~
5'-07 \: ,:, ~
:\ 1 )\ ,l~:/:
~~ ,_- @ , ...... I
/>1'-'\: - i \,:
: : 1 ! / ,g:
\>+'/>'H:t
:+~s~~!
1
~
--<
o
M
o
<>
)>
..;
o
z
cD
I
~I
~I
"11
,
\~
e
.--\
~
,OO'OOl
wz
~~ 5~
~~ ~~
~~ ~~
~~ F~
~2 8
~; ~
III :;!
~ ;;;
m
!~
'"
-'f"".1 .. N if ~~~ m ~~~ ~~~
/ 'I;. 'illio ;!! I .,. ; bi !~
' . J , . "j,,- II p, i '" .'
\ ',/ a~ ~ ~~}:;~ ~~ it <;I ~~~ ~~
';;", ': ! I,.,; SI . ~ I;i ;'
li..,i.." h!~.. !, :~ 'I
>>>-~~< I ~ I. ,,~Z C ~ ."0 ,.
· ll'l · illi ii ! !l:~ !
s~;> ~ ~,.. <;1;1 ~.3 ~z'" ~
" i i!i~"8 p " "'~ ~
· · IlII i. ili I
~ ~~~ - g
~~mi I~ 8
a~~~ ~~
~?g~ ~
il$C~-4 .
~
ACENDA ITE~ ~.
l).t\tiJ:
4
';;}\.
OJ:
r
r--
~
20' 6"
26'-0.
G
~
.
o
,. u
90 ~
~
~
5'-0"
5' 0"
I-~;-~~-~
=::F='l L_J
osor 11'-0" 0NIl
15'-6"
......
(J)
>-3
'"'j
r-'
o
o
::t1
S'1:l
~~
l>
.Z
~
C
~ ~.
<C
I
i
z
!'!
m",
48' 3~
".
'"
r; 6"
.
,.
'1
11
13'-5"
~
,.
.8' J"
~~~~~~1!8~M~g9~~%~
;~~~~:~~~2~~~~~~~~
~8~~~F~~~b~>~>~b~^
~~~zt~~~z~~~~a~~~~
2~~~~~AZP~~2~~~ZfO
~~~~~~~~g~~~~:~~~~
~C~~o,,~~n8~~~~mo~2m~
. '" z -0' 1"1",0 0
~~~z~;~~g>~~g2Z~=b
~Z~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~:~~~~~~~~~O~O~~..
~g~~8~~o~~~~~ig~
~:~j~~~=~~~~~a~~
Z~~~~~~~F~~~~iOm
~~~ga2~:ffl~~~>~~~
g~~~g3~~ ~S~ ~~~
n ~~ r- ~ ~
~
~~;5!~:IJ~g"'~~~z ..... ~g
~,,~g~I''ll~~~~~ ~ <: ~ ~~ ~~
~ilia~ ~~Ga~n oE>z Ol~ ~ ~"V~~~~~
m~ li~ B[:lil:Z~a2 ~~"l~~~~I'~l;~E~li:~~~<;l~~
~ia f'i1F;o~nc . j~lIt2: .~~i:~i5~"D!ZZOS!!"'UI
i ;'" l!1~~~~>; ~ ~~~~~ii>: m!!~~~S~~
C ~ ~\il ~ M)o ~ OI-~;![~ZOe 'zm )oo~ZUl
:z: '2J)o >- z lit 0 o....;;tomi:% ~::J:~cn2!::a.... ZC'):::Jc::
PI ~o~~g "'!Czl"'t,., c'" c!F t/) -<.:tPlOJ
; ~ ~~~m~ ~~"~.~~~~s ~1I!~8 ~g~~
~ g ~~'i;ca !l!iJ,."' l;~ ~ z<.1;;lr;
OJ Z C C C ~ C - 2!::5i!: "'~ 0 ...
PI ~ ~~~~m ~I-"'~ Z ~ :: ~!,
g :c: ~~~c~ ~~ ""'liO I .~ ~~~~
d ~,.,~~% :..~ :f-~ ~Q~
ill ~ >>_~2!:: nil"'~:I C:O~ IiIz
Z <~Zct:.:E ""II~ptllO_ z"'" ..~~
% 2:: a 25 "~!i~~ 0 0 ~~
.. ~ 2'!!'!(! &' >:!:t:;!zz ;g P P1z~
~ 01 MSf:~g~ . 0 00 0 ~ tn;2!::
... "~2tig ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ Jfit-
r<1~8J:; :P ~~~~ :~
gf"\ i$i ~fr1~~~ 0
S ~~~~~
~ c;)l=" ~
o ~1"""
~ ~ ~~~
~ ~ V1fTl:;C:
;0 C;~=
~ ~ ~~ ~
~ t!D g
O(")~
8>>
Z -0
.. <l
:;e Ci.
a g
f
~~~~
.?Yl?~
(") -0 ~
>>0
:S3
"'>>
"oJ <
en..
~ $ i1:2
~ z ,~t(l.
g ,~S~
z lllll'lf:':!
~io~
~
AOENDA iTEM NO.
PACE 1 S OF
4
~\
:::d
o
~o
~'""1j
,'"d
.o;.r
."..>
'Z
I
r
;r
l\Jl
z
R
~1' ~
I .
t ~
I
I
I
1'_0':'
r-----------------------
\)
I
I
I
.,
~I
I
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
,...I
-,
,
L_________________
o
"'(J)
II'~
~C
,0
I
q-l
EB
o
fTl
-l
E:
r
i
~
II:!,
1'-
'" ~
o 0
o ~
-., =>
<<>
-u
r
)> ;;:
Z ~
i"
m",
\)
\)
1
\)
..~
"
,-
,q
0:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
_____________________J
o
EB
El
o
1-"=-.
30
m"
tom
Xx
g~
<"
"..
;OX
~~
X
~
<
"
o"'O! ).J <-<;ll))>e-01O
~~~ p:~~S~~~~~
001 ,g~o~()l>-"->
~m~ ~~t~
~~~ ~tij~
~:-'::!.
~~i. E'
~~~ -,
~ ~;o~ /00
Q ~~~ :~. i..~~~~
() gU:P l)fii~~~fi~~
o c5Z ;r~<o' .-. '>!j
~ ~~, ~~~:S~!ign
~ ~>g ;g~~~;::!~
~ ~~~ ~~lS;-4(1lE~~
JO ::;-1. 6:...:-n. r-l
I: ,,>z m,...;z;) <~
~ ~;. br~gSiji
~ ~ ~ +0 "II ~~
~ lD~!! lil ~2
~
~
:J>r~
-UO ~
z"-'"
..0.......
z "
.. ~
~ ~~
'" "
3 :;
0:
g
"
~~~~
- -u '"
9v>~~
O"N
)>c
<<>3
'"
u)>
"<
m",
u"''''
(:j~=
~~ ~
.....CD (tJ
, '"
00-
~>
~ t:) ::: 0 III
m ..., m UI.... to< N -;;0
"
it~ dF ~;g F J ~s:l;!:GF ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ :o~
~;;t ~z 1i~ < 2 ~:~ ~ 2;;J ~ j=~ ~ ~~
~: m~ ~'"' ~ ~ ..~~ ~~ ~ ~ 0 ~~ ~ ~z
l>i:l ~i "'~ iJi !! ::Jf;1~ !il5 ~ ~ f~ " "'~
~'6 ~'" ~ '" a i~~ ~"q 8h~"
~~ ~i ~ F >- ;Gt~ -< ~ m < ~; ~ ~
~ ~'" ~ 11\ ; ;oll~ ~ ~ ~ ~ &~ ill ~
'1', '0\1: ~;!I I- "'''m e" '" ~ . ~
2~ ,:;; ~ >- !: ~~I!l ;;!; ED · la g~ i:;; ,.,
~~~!2 ~'j$t ...Dlf;l ;x J;; ~ I'i "' r1
ilI~;;!~ ,,;.. 1il::J~ 'l' h ~ ~~ '"
s~ ~~ f ~ !~~ ~;; ~ "1J g~ ~
"1J j;J..... N p~ ~ "if 0 >: z;!l
~?o ~ ~.... ~~l/) '1.. :z ~~
~Sc:_ ~ J'I ~ iJ~~ ~ x ~g
~ ; ~ i~; ~ ~ ~~
~! ~ c:< i:F; g~
- ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~
~~ ~o ::;;;$1 ~ c
P1p pi
ilI~ cl
:it
g
~
..
!z$
:;;'
...
o
z
AOENDA ITEM NO.
PACE ~ b
~
OF ~\
/"""'
~z
'1:0
S~
r~
r;O;
'"
I'
I
I
I II
I II
1
t?:l 1 ~
I
t"""' I
t?:l I
/""," 1 ".1
-< 1
:J> 1 I
>-3 1
....... I
0 1
1
Z 1
1
I
tIJ I
n
~ I
I
I
~ I
I
~ I
/"""'
I
r
~
c..u ]-
z
!=!
;v"'U 9 CJ
~ · a ~
~ - ! ..
z c.
p
I
t"""' I
t?:l 1
I
'Tj I
>-3 I
~ 1
1
t?:l I
:J> I
W. 1
I
>-3 I
I
t?:l I
1
t"""' 1
t?:l 1
-< 1
I
:J> I
>-3 I
....... I
0 1
Z 1
1
1
1
U} I
n
~ 1
I
I
'- I
.... 1
~~ I
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
I
I
:::0
C;S
::r::
>-3
~
;3
w.
>-3
t?:l
t"""'
t?:l
-<
:J>
>-3
o
Z
~
i"
~ 0 ~~~
~ ::e .. (D-->
~~. ~~~
~ ~ ~Q ~
{/} ~ .,..~ CD'
I "
on-
~)>
z "
~ "
::e 'ai"
:;u "
" cc
o
f
~z
'1:0
l"o
~~
~~
g' ,"
6'-8'"
tIJ
n
~
'-
...
.!!.:
J-_n_A'J
'Tj
:::0
o
Z
>-3
~
Z
o
:::0
>-3
::r::
t?:l
t"""'
t?:l
-<
:J>
>-3
.......
o
Z
==0
==0
==0
==0
5:0
1'0
~~
~i
e m
~~i T
g ~
i~~ ~
~I:t~
;;oN3::0
a'~;-" ~
- ""
9v>~~
n" N
>0
~3
"'>
.....<
"'"
o
~z$
o
z
[EI [!;]
~
El ~
7-
:ia ~
88~ ~
"l"'~ !il
l~... F;;
aUl~ ~
~ ~ 0
8"2 e" 1;!
lil~n fa li1
is ~ ~
il 'l'
i ~
8{ii.l!~
!G~~ 0
!,-;at;
f~~tfi
~5~"
o~ z
~UJ
. ....'."'t~r, !"rq. "10 _
J\',;;V'.L.-h H..JI > . "'~_~~Q .
fACS.......L""l J)F..-.--J.l..
r'
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
TO:
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE:
JUNE 6, 2006
PREPARED BY:
JUSTIN CARLSON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
PROJECT TITLE:
MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 12531 PALM STREET
(APN: 375-041-024)
APPLICANT:
HECTOR ZUBIETA: 26397 BECKMAN COURT,
MURRIETA, CA 92562
~
OWNER:
MAURICE UMANAH: 753 CLARADAY STREET,
APT. 12, GLENDORA, CA 91740
PROJECT REQUEST
The applicant is requesting design review consideration for a conventionally built
single- family dwelling unit with a raised foundation pursuant to Chapter 17.82 (Design
Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.23 (R-I
Single-Family Residential District), and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC).
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Pro' ect Site
North
South
East
West
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Residential
Residential
R-3 Hi h Densi Residential
R-2 (Medium Density Residential)
R-3 (High Density Residential)
S ecific Plan J
S ecific Plan J
S ecific Plan J
Specific Plan J
Specific Plan J
~
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE \
5
OF ?> 0
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 12531 PALM STREET
(APN: 375-041-024)
""'"
PROJECT LOCATION
The approximately .14 acre vacant site is located on the northeast side of Palm Street
and approximately 30-feet west of Illinois Street, within Specific Plan J (Country Club
Heights #1). More specifically, the property is located within the R-3 (High-Density
Residential District) land use area, Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 375-041-024.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting design review consideration for the design and
establishment of a 1,386 square-foot raised foundation single-family residence with an
attached 476 square-foot two (2) car garage and a 94 square-foot front porch.
The total building footprint including the residence, garage, and front porch will
occupy approximately 1,956 square-feet. The proposed project requires a ten foot (10')
slope easement along the property frontage and along the easterly property lines (along
Palm Street and Illinois Street) of the project for future realignment and standard
comer cutback in the right-of-way. Including this required slope easement dedication,
the existing lot has a net lot area of 6,000 square-feet. The proposed dwelling unit will
have a net lot coverage of approximately thirty-one percent (31 %), which is in
compliance with Section 17.23.090 (Lot Coverage) of the LEMC. This section of the
LEMC, limits the maximum lot coverage of all structures to fifty percent (50%).
......"
Architecture
The applicant has chosen to construct the proposed single-family residence using
elements similar to Mediterranean style architecture. The west (front) elevation, visible
from Palm Street, will include; decorative "Ledgestone" stone veneer base furring,
coach lights on either side of the garage and front-entry door, arched Mediterranean
windows and garage door frame, an ornamental wrought iron railing along the front-
entry porch that connects to a decorative stucco column, and a stucco pop-out with a
recessed arched window. It should be noted that all windows, including the garage
door, will include divided lites (mullions).
......,
AGENDA ITEM 5
PAGE~OF~
,,-
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF; A SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 12531 PALM STREET
(APN: 375-041-024)
Furthermore, the west (front) elevation will include Mediterranean stucco block
pilasters with concrete caps and ornamental wrought iron fencing in between. The
stucco block pilasters have been designed to match the exterior of the dwelling unit.
The south elevation, directly adjacent to Illinois Street and pursuant to the Community
Design Element of the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, will receive the same
architectural elemental attention that was devoted to the west (front elevation). The
applicant has chosen to include arched Mediterranean windows with stucco foam
surrounds and a decorative chimney cap. Pursuant to Section 17.14.130 of the LEMC,
the applicant will install stucco block pilasters with concrete caps and ornamental
wrought iron fencing in between. This decorative fencing will extend from the wall
return on the front (west) elevation to the rear property line.
,,-
On the east (rear) and north (interior) elevations, the applicant will include stucco foam
surrounds on all windows and coach lights on the rear sliding doors. The applicant
proposes to install three (3) wood decks that cascade down to the rear and side yards.
Landscavinf!
Front yard landscaping will be installed and will include an automatic irrigation system
and a rain sensor, which will assist in the conservation of water. The proposed
landscaping will include two (2) IS-gallon Magnolia Gradiflora from the approved
City of Lake Elsinore Street Tree List, Yellow Gazania groundcover, and adequate
amounts of 5-gallon accent shrubs. Moreover, the applicant proposes to preserve and
incorporate two (2) existing palm trees into the landscaping of the project, which is in
compliance with Chapter 5.78 (Significant Palm Trees) of the LEMC.
r-'
AGENDA ITEM 5
PAGE~OF~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 12531 PALM STREET
(APN: 375-041-024)
"-'
Color and Materials
Roof
Caliente
Walls
Window surrounds
Trim/Fascia Board/Columns
Base Furrin
Sandstone
Pacific Sand
Water Chestnut
Red Rock
La Habra
La Habra
"Coun
BACKGROUND
On March 16,2006 the Design Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the proposed plans
and provided several substantive comments on the proposed architectural design,
building massing, fencing along the right-of-ways (Palm Street and Illinois Street), and
landscaping. The DRC recommended that the applicant revise the architecture to
incorporate elements that are consistent with the selected style of architecture. Once
revised, the applicant re-submitted plans along with building elevations that indicate
that the DRC's recommendations were fully incorporated into the project.
....."
ANALYSIS
Staffhas reviewed the project and found that with the attached conditions of approval,
the project meets all minimum requirements of Chapter 17.82 (Design Review),
Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.23 (R-l, Single-
Family Residential District}, and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) including but not limited to; density, setbacks,
landscaping, parking, private open space, and lot coverage.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15303(a) (New
Construction of Small Structures), staff has determined that the proposed project will
....."
AGENDA ITEM 5
PAGE~OF~O
~
~
I"""'"
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 12531 PALM STREET
(APN: 375-041-024)
not have a significant affect on the environment and shall therefore be exempt from the
provisions of CEQA. Therefore no additional environmental clearance is necessary.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2006-_
approving the proposed single-family residence based on the following Findings,
Exhibits, and the proposed Conditions of Approval.
FINDINGS
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the
intended General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project will be
located.
The proposed Residential Design Review for a proposed single-family residence
located at 12531 Palm Street (APN: 375-041-024) complies with the goals and
objectives of General Plan designation Specific Plan J. Specific Plan J is
comprised of 1,312 acres and is intended to provide a range of densities and
some limited commercial and industrial uses. The approval of this single-family
dwelling unit will assist in achieving the development of a well-balanced and
functional mix of residential, limited commercial, limited industrial, open space,
recreational and institutional land uses by providing additional affordable
housing within the City of Lake Elsinore, as well as encouraging the
development and maintenance of a broad range ofhousing types for all income
groups and age categories. It should be noted that the proposed dwelling unit,
which incorporates Mediterranean style architecture; will provide a well
rounded design while maintaining the desirable rural characteristics and base
framework to achieve quality and compatibility in the physical design of the
developing portions of the City, and to enhance existing developed areas within
Specific Plan J.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060
and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The proposed Residential Design Review located at 12531 Palm Street (APN:
AGENDA ITEM S
PAGE ~ OF ~O
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 12531 PALM STREET
(APN: 375-041-024)
375-041-024) is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that
the single-family dwelling unit has been provided; twenty-foot (20') front yard
and rear yard setbacks; sufficient front yard landscaping and safe and sufficient
on-site vehicular circulation. Further, the project as proposed will complement
the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-
detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects in that the
applicant is providing elements of Mediterranean style architecture which
include; 360-degree decorative window surrounds, Mediterranean style arched
windows, coach lights, and flagstone veneer base furring. In addition, the
applicant is providing a variety of colors and materials which include Lahabra
stucco painted beige "Sandstone"; window surrounds with "Pacific Sand" by
La Habra stucco, fascia in a "Water Chestnut" by Glidden, and Country
Ledgestone Flagstone in a "Red Rock" finish. In addition, the applicant will
include a "Caliente" S- tile concrete roof
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not
anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed
Residential Design Review to be located at 12531 Palm Street (APN: 375-041-
024), as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City Divisions,
Departments and Agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment
pursuant to Article 19; (Categorical Exemptions) and Section 15303 (a), Class
3; (New Construction of Small Structures).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code,
including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been
incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of
the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed Residential Design Review has
been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission.
The project has also been conditioned to comply with the LEMC. For example,
Condition of Approval Number 8 has been included which states; "All site
improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and
elevations, with revisions as noted herein. The applicant shall meet all required
AGENDA ITEM S
PAGE1LOF~O
"""
'-'
'-'
~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 12531 PALM STREET
(APN: 375-041-024)
setbacks and development standards pursuant to Section 17.23 (R-1 Single-
Family Residential). Any revisions to the Minor Design Review attached hereto
shall be processed in a similar manner as the original Minor Design Review. All
plans submitted for Building Division plan check shall conform to the submitted
plans as modified by the Conditions of Approval".
PREPARED BY:
JUSTIN CARLSON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
APPROVED BY:
~--
Rolfe M. Preisendanz,
Director of Community Development
,-.....
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Planning Commission Resolution
3. Planning Commission Conditions of Approval
4. Preliminary Site/Landscape Plan
5. Preliminary Drainage Plan
4. Floor Plan
5. Roof Plan
6. Building Elevations
7. Building Sections
8. Detail Sheet
"..--
AGENDA ITEM S
PAGE l OF '}o
VICINITY MAP
MINOR DESIGN REVIEW
12531 PALM STREET
"""
\
RIVERSIDE ST
....,
~
/
"""
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA ITEM NO._ 5
PAGE_ ~ OF _ 30
[lJi+lt +k a.dded ~d.;.{-;6't s-~r
~
RESOLUTION NO. 2006- 5Y-
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY
DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST SIDE
OF PALM STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 30-FEET WEST
OF ILLINOIS STREET AT 12531 PALM STREET (APN: 375-
041-024).
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by
Hector Zubieta, requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for a single-family
residence on property located on the northeast side of Palm Street and
approximately 30-feet west of Illinois Street pursuant to Chapter 17.82 (Design
Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.23
(Single-Family Residential), Chapter and 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC); and;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of t~e City of Lake Elsinore has
/'"' been delegated with the responsibility of approving Minor Design Review requests
for residential projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given and the
Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with
respect to this item on June 6, 2006.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE,
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed
design for the single-family residence and has found it acceptable. The Planning
Commission finds and determines that this project is consistent with the LEMC
and is exempt from further environmental clearance under Section 15303, Class
3(a) (New Construction of Small Structures), of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA).
,,-...
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of
the LEMC, the following findings for the approval of the project have been made
as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the
intended General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project will be
located. AOENDA ITEM NO. 5
PAOE '\. OF 30
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
PAGE 2 OF 4
The proposed Residential Design Review for a proposed single-family
residence located at 12531 Palm Street (APN:. 375-041-024) complies with
the goals and objectives of General Plan designation Specific Plan J.
Specific Plan J is comprised of 1,312 acres and is intended to provide a
range of densities and some limited commercial and industrial uses. The
approval of this single-family dwelling unit will assist in achieving the
development of a well-balanced and functional mix of residential, limited
commercial, limited industrial, open space, recreational and institutional
land uses by providing additional affordable housing within the City of Lake
Elsinore, as well as encouraging the development and maintenance ofa
broad range of housing types for all income groups and age categories. It
should be noted that the proposed dwelling unit, which incorporates
Mediterranean style architecture; will provide a well rounded design while
maintaining the desirable rural characteristics and base framework to
achieve quality and compatibility in the physical design of the developing
portions of the City, and to enhance existing developed areas within Specific
Plan J.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section
17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The proposed Residential Design Review located at 12531 Palm Street
(APN: 375-041-024) is appropriate to the site and surrounding
developments in that the single-family dwelling unit has been provided;
twenty-foot (20') front yard and rear yard setbacks; sufficient front yard
landscaping and safe and sufficient on-site vehicular circulation. Further,
the project as proposed will complement the quality of existing development
and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the
proposed and existing projects in that the applicant is providing elements of
Mediterranean style architecture which include; 360-degree decorative
window surrounds, Mediterranean style arched windows, coach lights, and
flagstone veneer base furring. In addition, the applicant is providing a
variety of colors and materials which include Lahabra stucco painted beige
"Sandstone"; window surrounds with "Pacific Sand" by La Habra stucco,
fascia in a "Water Chestnut" by Glidden, and Country Ledgestone
Flagstone in a "Red Rock" finish. In addition, the applicant will include a
"Caliente" S- tile concrete roof
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not
anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed
Residential Design Review to be located at 12531 Palm Street (APN: 375-
041-024), as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City Divisions,s
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE 10 OF 30
"-'
......"
"""'"
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE30F4 -
/""'
Departments and Agencies, will not have a significant effect on the
environment pursuant to Article 19; (Categorical Exemptions) and Section
15303 (a), Class 3; (New Construction of Small Structures).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning
Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions,
have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure
development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter
17.82.
Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed Residential Design
Review has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning
Commission. The project has also been conditioned to comply with the
LEMC. For example, Condition of Approval Number 8 has been included
which states; HAll site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the
approved site plan and elevations, with revisions as noted herein. The
applicant shall meet all required setbacks and development standards
pursuant to Section 17.23 (R-1 Single-Family Residential). Any revisions to
.~ the Minor Design Review attached hereto shall be processed in a similar
manner as the original Minor Design Review. All plans submitted for
Building Division plan check shall conform to the submitted plans as
modified by the Conditions of Approval".
SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 2006, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
/""'
ACENDA ITEM NO.
PACE \ \
S
OF ~O
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
PAGE40F4
ATTEST:
Rolfe Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5
PAGE l';l OF ~O
.......,
.......,
.......,
~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST
SIDE OF PALM STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 30-FEET WEST OF
ILLINOIS (APN: 375-041-024).
Note: Fees listed in the Conditions of Approval are the best estimates available at
the time of approval. The exact fee amounts will be reviewed at the time of permit
issuance and may be revised.
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials,
officers, employees, and/or agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against
the City, its officials, officers, employees, or agents concerning the project
attached hereto, which action is brought forward within the time period
provided for in California Government Code Section 65009 and Public
Resources Code Section 21167.
~ 2. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final ten (10) days from the
date of the decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Council
pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.80 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code.
3. If the project proposes an outdoor storage tank, the applicant shall locate the
unit within the side or rear yards. If location must be within the front yard, the
applicant shall provide a method of screening subject to the review and
approval of the Director of Community Development or his designee.
PLANNING DIVISION
4. Minor Design Review approval of a single-family dwelling unit located at
12531 Palm Street (APN: 375-041-024) will lapse and become void one (1)
year of the approval date unless a building permit is issued and construction
commenced and diligently pursued toward completion.
5. All Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced upon page one of building
plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division for Plan Check. All
r-- Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy and release of utilities.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5
PACE l:, OF 30
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST
SIDE OF PALM STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 30-FEET WEST OF
ILLINOIS (APN: 375-041-024).
,...,
6. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the Applicant shall sign
and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions," and shall return the
executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in
the case records.
7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the Applicant shall obtained and
submit a ''will serve" letter from Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District to
the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. The "wjll serve"
letter shall specifically indicate the specific water flow volumes for both
domestic and fire protection water supply.
8.. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site
plan and elevations, with revisions as noted herein. The applicant shall meet all
required setbacks and development standards pursuant to Section 17.23 (R-l
Single-Family Residential). Any revisions to the Minor Design Review attached
hereto shall be processed in a similar manner as the original Minor Design
Review. All plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check shall conform to
the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of Approval.
"""
9. All materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used
unless modified by the Applicant and approved by the Community
Development Director or designee.
1 O.All windows shall use foam surrounds and/or other architectural-type features
approved by the Community Development Director or designee.
II.All roofing materials shall have a minimum Class "A" Fire rating, and so noted
on the construction plans.
12. The Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances.
13.A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers placed
on the site and used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal
of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to the
approval of the Community Development Director or designee. I
ACENDA ITEM NO. ::;>
PACE I~ OF 3D
"""
,-...
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST
SIDE OF PALM STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 30-FEET WEST OF
ILLINOIS (APN: 375-041-024).
l4.The Applicant shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. Construction
activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through
Friday, and no construction activity shall occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal
holidays.
15.The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading
Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in
accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using
accepted control techniques: Interim erosion control measures shall be
provided thirty (30) days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City
Engineer.
~ l6.Any exterior air conditioning or other mechanical equipment shall be ground
mounted and screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property or
public streets. Air conditioning units and related equipment may not encroach
more than two-feet (2') into the required minimum side yard setback.
17. Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum interior clear space of
twenty feet (20') x twenty feet (20') for two cars.
l8.The Applicant shall plant twenty-four inch (24") box street trees on center
(o.c.), selected from the City Street Tree List, a maximum of thirty feet (30')
apart and along all street frontages. Planting is subject to the approval of the
Community Development Director or designee prior to issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy.
19. The Applicant shall provide shrubs and plant materials as shown on the
landscape plan. Any changes to this plan shall be subject to the approval of the
Community Development Director or designee. The landscape plan
improvements and plantings shall be fully installed prior to issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
.,...--
ACENDA ITEM NO.
PACE ,~ OF ~()
5
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST
SIDE OF PALM STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 30-FEET WEST OF
ILLINOIS (APN: 375-041-024).
~
20.Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than
36 inches.
21. The Applicant shall provide an irrigation system for landscaped areas onsite as
shown on the landscape plans. The irrigation system shall be fully installed and
operational prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
22. The Applicant shall provide a rain sensor as shown on the landscape plan. The
rain censor shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
23.All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have permanent
irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, as approved by the
City's Landscape Architect. A Planting and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted,
., approved and planted prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Fees
are required for review of plans and inspections. """'"
24.Driveways shall be constructed of concrete per Building and Safety Division
standards.
25.All walls or fences located in any front yard shall not exceed thirty-six inches
(36") in height with the exception that wrought-iron fences may be five feet (5')
in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited.
26.All walls and/or fencing need to be located off the property line. If the
Applicant proposes to place any walls and/or fencing on the property line
he/she must submit a notarized agreement between the subject property owner
and the adjacent property owner to the Planning Department prior to
installation.
27.The Applicant shall construct the City's Standard six foot (6') wood fence
along the west and north property line. Along the west property line, the
applicant shall construct a decorative block wall with ornamental wrought iron
in between. The exterior finish of the proposed wall shall match the finish of the
proposed house. The applicant shall be required to remove and replace any ....,
existing chain link fencing and any fencing that is in poor condition. It will be
the responsibility of the applicant to contact the effected neighboring property
ACENDA ITEM NO. 5
PACE If> OF 30
,r-.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST
SIDE OF PALM STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 30-FEET WEST OF
ILLINOIS (APN: 375-041-024).
owners. If the existing fencing is in good condition, this requirement may be
waived per the approval of the Community Development Director or Designee.
28.The building address shall be a minimum of four inches (4") high and shall be
easily visible from the public right-of-way. Care shall be taken to select colors
and materials that contrast with building walls or trim.
29.The Applicant shall provide a flat concrete pad a minimum of 3'- 0" by 7'- 0"
adjacent to each dwelling unit. The storage pad for trash barrels shall be
concealed from public view.
30.The Applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore
Unified School District have been paid prior to issuance of building permits.
,r-.
31. The Applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees in effect at the time prior to issuance
of building permits.
32. The Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities.
33.The Applicant shall pay the Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee
(MSHCP) Local Development Mitigation Fee of $1,651.00 (fee for density less
than 8 du/ac) prior to obtaining building permits.
34. The Applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $64.00 made payable to
the County of Riverside for a Notice of Exemption. The check shall be
submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the
proj ects approval.
35.The Applicant shall pay all applicable Library Capital Improvement Fund fee.
,......
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE \"l
5
OF 30
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST
SIDE OF PALM STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 30-FEET WEST OF
ILLINOIS (APN: 375-041-024).
'-"
ENGINEERING DIVISION
GENERAL
36. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of
development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to
building permit.
37.The Applicant shall submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering
Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer
arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for
the water service at the location. such as water pressure and volume etc.
Submit tpis letter prior to applying for a building permit.
38.All arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, ~
vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the
property owner or his agent.
39.The Applicant shall provide fire protection access and facilities as required in
writing by Riverside County Fire.
40.In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal &
recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for
removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish
generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of
construction.
41. The Applicant shall protect palm trees in place, or contact the Community
Services of City of Lake Elsinore for Palm Tree Preservation Program, LEMC
5.78 Ordinance 1044.
DEDICATION
42.The Applicant shall dedicate a ten-foot slope easement or right of way along
Illinois Street and along Palm Street property lines for future street alignment
prior to issuance of building permit (Res. 87-64). ACENDA 'TEM NO. 5
PACE \0 OF 30
~
,--..
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST
SIDE OF PALM STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 30-FEET WEST OF
ILLINOIS (APN: 375-041-024).
43.The Applicant shall dedicate an additional right-of-way easement for a standard
comer cutback for the future curb return at comer of the Illinois and Palm
Street.
44.All public right-of-way dedications shall be prepared by the Applicant or his
agent. Deeds shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for review and
approval prior to issuance of building permit.
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
45.The Applicant shall grade Palm Street forty-feet 40' wide, provide swales on
both sides of road, and their transition for adequate drainage, pave twenty-feet
,..... (20') feet wide 3" asphalt concrete over 4" aggregate base centered within the
existing right of way. Plans must be approved and signed by the City Engineer
prior to issuance of building permit (LEMC 16.34).
46.A California Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare street improvement plans
and specifications. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to
Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes
(LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). Street improvement plans shall show existing and
future profiles at centerline of street, at top of curb and at centerline of the alley.
The profiles and contours shall extend to fifty-feet (50') beyond the property
limits on Illinois and Palm Street centerlines.
47.If the existing street improvements are to be modified, the existing street plans
on file shall be modified accordingly and approved by the City Engineer prior
to issuance of building permit. An encroachment permit will be required to do
the work.
48.All work done under an encroachment permit for off-site improvements shall be
delineated on the street improvement plans and approved and signed by the City
...-- Engineer prior to issuance of building permits.
ACENDA nEM NO,_ 5
PACE \'\ _OF.. 30
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST
SIDE OF PALM STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 30-FEET WEST OF
ILLINOIS (APN: 375-041-024).
'-'
49. The Applicant shall pay all fees and meet requireplents of an encroachment
permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of off-site public
works improvements (LEMC 12.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for
an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy.
50.All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie
notes delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering
Division before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and
approved.
GRADING
51. The Developer shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading .
from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval.
~
52. The Applicant shall apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security
prior to any grading activity.
53.A grading plan stamped/signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer is
required since the grading exceeds fifty (50) cubic yards and the existing flow
pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. The
grading plan shall show volumes of cut and fill, adequate counters and/or spot
elevations of the existing ground as surveyed by a licensed surveyor or civil
engineer. Contours shall extend to minimum of fifteen-feet (15') beyond
property lines to indicate existing drainage pattern. Apply and obtain a grading
permit with appropriate security prior to grading permit issuance.
54.The Applicant shall provide soils, geology and seismic report, as part of this
report addressing the requirements of the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Act. The Applicant shall also provide final soils report showing
compliance with recommendations.
55.In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal &
recycling, the Applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for
removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish
generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases oL
ACENDA ITEM NO. 5
PACE ~O OF 30
~
/"""
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST
SIDE OF PALM STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 30-FEET WEST OF
ILLINOIS (APN: 375-041-024).
construction.
56.The Applicant shall provide erosion control measures as part of their grading
plan. The Applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and
meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES
Drainage Area Management Plan.
57.All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and
shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to I for stability and proper erosion
control.
DRAINAGE
/""" 58.On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent
property owners by a notarized letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a
drainage easement.
59.All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or
shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer.
60.All roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through the coring in the
street curb. All roofs should drain to a landscaped area.
61. The Applicant shall submit a Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and
approval by City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. Developer
shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development
of the site and/or diversion of drainage.
FEES
62. The Applicant shall pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC
16.34). The traffic impact fee (TIF) is $1,369.00 and the drainage fee is $812.00
,,-.. (Riverside Drive So. Dist.) and the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
(TUMF) amount is $7,248.
63.The Applicant shall provide in-lieu payment of seventy-dollars ($70) per linear
AGENDA ITEM NO., 5
PACE ~ \ Of 30.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST
SIDE OF PALM STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 30-FEET WEST OF
ILLINOIS (APN: 375-041-024).
,...""
foot of the property frontage on Illinois Streets, for future off-site public
improvements prior to building permit.(Res. 86-35).
STORMW ATER/ CLEANW ATER PROTECTION PROGRAM
64. The City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management
and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local
storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system
or local. surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing
oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm
water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures
are available at City Hall.
PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain
system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or
waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law.
"""'"
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
65. The Applicant is to pay park fees of $1 ,600 per unit.
66. The Applicant will be required to participate in the "Public Facility" fee
program.
67. The Applicant shall participate m the City-wide Lighting, Landscape
Maintenance District (LLMD).
68. The Applicant is to comply with all City Ordinances regarding construction
debris removal and recycling as per Section 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code.
LAKE ELSINORE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
69.Under the provisions of SB 50, the owner or developer will be required to pay
school fees or enter into a mitigation agreement prior to the issuance of a
certificate of compliance by the district. AuENDA ITEM NO. 5
PAO~ ~ ~ OF 3>0
,....."
~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST
SIDE OF PALM STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 30-FEET WEST OF
ILLINOIS (APN: 375-041-024).
LAKE ELSINORE POLICE DEPARTMENT
70. The Applicant shall provide assurances, prior to building permit, that all
requirements of the Lake Elsinore Police Department have been met.
ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
71. The Applicant shall request a ''will server" for service of sewer.
ELSINORE WATER DISTRICT
72. A four inch (4") water main is located in front of the parcel. The Applicant
/"" shall request a "will serve" letter.
/""
Avl::NDA ITEM NO. S
PAGE ~~ OF 30
~<
gcJ
Z
--j
-<
s:::
)>
-0
"
If)
--j
I'l
-0
.-
)>
z
/'
~ ~ ~ ~
n ~ >
~ ~ ~ ;
& i 1 ~
~
i
ro ~
~ :;:: IMJ
: :!< 61
i 0 lMJ
. CC> ~
: g ~
: en
,~
.-
f
~
I
,
,
I
I
/
t
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
J
I
t I
In
: III
: II
I
I
I
I
I
I
"'/
al :,
~ ,:I ~
I
--L
,~
p
,
I~ :
~I
1;;0 ~I
~:;;J
1--4 "I
I
I )
I .~
I
I
r
J
~ ~ 0 :i~i~ ~
1- ~ ~ .*1 r
~ ~ h~~~ =t
~ (;\ li~!-;!!
z h g ~
o "~~ <
III ~ III
X ; -<
q ()
~ ~
mn
~ml
ii!h
r J
. ..-oaoL""'"
_~...""" SITE PLAN
1l(SI(l[HJIoIl+~+Jtl)USfRW.
2Ul71lE~t'f. YUllfII(T-, CA~
<lFFltt ...._~7"., 'l-_~-.Mt
....""
&
~
~
'"
~
N5!r34.30-r
n
r
~
~
i
l!l
j.l'
~
!
......"
'LUNOIS'::~
,..
-
ST
~
II
II
P SE'IO .. ~;;
..
.-
I
~
o
UH ~i q n; p~ ~fniH ~
~iH ~4 ~ 0 ~ q ~ iil ij S ~~ l
i~; ~ ~ i~ q I; ~ ria I b~ ~
f'i! ~ ~,. ~ Ill' '!
zg! ~ . ~ 1 ~ - ~ 6
~~r F .. ! ~ z !!
~>Ill ~ ~ i 0 i i ~ I; i I
~ ~, "
ill ~ llll'
ii J ij I
~ II ~ ~~
~i ~ h
,p !!
O 0 .0~ . . -
~.., l>
UUH FUnU
h~ H ~I 2!i~ll>
~ r ~ I r ~ ~I J.
I I q .1 ~ II I z
! i, ~~.~
~ ~~ ~,-
e~ :i!
i ~ ; I
x i
Ii . &
e .
~ Ii it ~
· l~ & i ~
~ I' > -<
. illO
" p~l>
~ ~l ~
, i;
! -s
I;,
AGENDA ITEM NO. S
PAGE Q~ OF ~D
........"
MAURICE A. UMANAH
12531 PALM ST.
LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530
~ ~ ;
I
! 1 i
.
"..-..
I d 3~11
Ii -,
I ~ i' ! i I:. i
hg H J~~
.~ 'I_ il
I~' i 1 Si..
I ;1 8 Ii lll,
$&I~
I~I
U!
III
I r . l/
"..-..
I
d' i
r
"..-..
"
~
"
i illl'!'11
~JU II~II
I~a I I
";_":16
lit, 51 !
li;i :~Ii
II:~ ~lll
l'lii II-I-!
l .I'~ i
&:11 !I!I
I 'I .I-~
i ~! I-D
eee
III
~ !~~: I i~~i t !..
~ pli I" "i~1 ~ l
~il! '~
.~llli-~.q~''''~'''.llll''1 ~e
B n IlIn B :''':: ~C:II~II
Illll UI II~ttldllllll.1
i!1 US , ..
B I
--
i
~
ft",...~
1) ( ^~ '>,f\
sq
!r
.g
i:.
Xr
i
&
~~ ~
! I, I
l.B
t
I
I ~
I ~
I
'I
,
,
I
~ ~
4 ~
.t-F
r
-.,
>T.T .'-oj' '.-1'
...-oj- .-t
roo:t. i'"
....... r I ..,
~
.."",
:&~
-I~ ~
~ Z
o ~II
_~ l<i> .
"
~'<t> .
Of ~
UJ.~
fh~ ~ i ~
-
n .......
! (-"'....
i
"
I -
... ~ Il. r--.:-
l--- ~::::J!
4
J
~
J I
o I.IL t.o
1: _ 'll
6 . '3---L
.
"
~
.t
-Pj!! .
J:Ji~ ~ .4-
Ii ;t z
~
1
,
~
Ir-
I
I
I
L. , i III
. .
" I
I
I
1:;-;=
~
"., III9!I:i .'-Aj-....; - - - -~-a
V .--t .t n rl~
~ 7 i~
I ._ t .-Jt~..., .;:or ~ n
~. ! i ~
I.J I /,11- - << ~ ~
--- ~ ~
~ 11> I.!!- ~
4E> Ie... 1__c:::::::J...........
--- ~... ~~ .o.::::.J~ 1 ~
1!1 II$-:t(
~ U
~.ji z: l .~ I
t~ ~ ~ dP~
e L..ot
..-oj-
f -.&
&
.-oj-
.-<1'
~
. '""":"..... FLOOR PLAN
_:.J:WnIlG
~+~+~
..,IlOlIaICL IiUIlEM. Cl'1DIf
ClI'JI:I[_-zlI-7M:z~
~
. .
. .
,
.
.; i.
,
~~
t. I"-"
~
Lt
~ 1. i .A\..
I-~
.
~~
~
r.ot
AGENDA ITEM tJO. 5
PAGE ~ b OF 30"-'
MAURICE A. UMANAH
I I
12531 PALM ST.
LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530
".........
/""'""-
r--
nllll 0 Iii IIi ;lli~ II 1III
II~I ! I~ I LIII' ~,l ~ !ih ~
~i .'
I~
!! E ~ 'I i~ li Ini'll JII ~
It II ~ip . ~ m
I "Ii I ~.i'"
I q.i t
i ~ ~ SC
v I~
!~
!
r
~a
-4
............ ~."'ot:..
;J!
~
L
~l;
!. !i
~.
AGENDA ITEM NO. .5
PAGE ~\. OF 30
. --.. -- ROOF PlAN
-E.-
-..-...........
.", tIDIWM o. ....... Cll.__
CftR___'" 1:~
MAURICE A. UMANAH
12531 PALM ST.
lAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530
iilI ~ y ~;z. J r ~;-> .!' 1>,..!" 0';" m
~ I~ ~ Ii i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ i R ~x f;;
~ .~ '., X f g g >>r i .g . J ~! -<
iil OJ i II Plj !,q n; ~
dbQr.5. gll: 'I~
. ~~ II il !' i. 1 ~ 5
t ~~ B~! i E I. t I iil
'3jJo.~ !~ 3 (f>
~~ ~ ~ .
! ~ .
i i
~ '
@ @(!)0
~~; ~~f~ !P I
Ih Ii ~i;
.a~ -I 8 ~
'5 ' ~I ~
E
c
e ~'''".. ""'" ELEVATIONS
~IlE$lGPI.lIIWllMG
""""
Il(SIllOf1lM.+C'OlIII.lOICIoI+lffllJSTRW.
2lll97.~cr. llIUflRUAClfZ117
orrlC(n1-lV-nDr z-_n>n.Aet
5
30
....."
....."
~ffi
~(f>
,--i
m
r
m
-<
1>
--i
~
,.....,
MAURICE A. UMANAH
12531 PALM ST.
LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530
.1;
i
Sl it
,
"...-.-
"...-.-
~
)>
~
II i i i I
III i II
Ii, ! ! I
~n
;~ ~
~il) -
i I !Ihl i
HI>
:m
~~
o
z
~
I~
!Ii
~i
"->1'
~
l z
!2 .~
l :;
. '''''''"i. .."" BUILDING SECTIONS
_flE'5IGM.DIWTIIG
""""
I _ ~
3
Jl($IllOfIW..COIrAllIlCW.+NllJS'IIIl/Il.
l8Jt7~CI.WIlfIIEl"~t2't:J
oma: el.~nv7 ,-~-....t
(J>
m
o
-l
o
Z
o!
~~~
~~m
III
III
i
~
01
I
O!J ~
I~. ~
~a&t
';~n
bin
,-0\'
~CENDAITEM NO. S
PACE ~~ OF 30
MAURICE A. UMANAH
12531 PALM ST.
LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530
~.... DETAILS
1l('SlllDfM.+~+M;lUSfMJII.
2$Jt7ll(~cr. 1IUlllI[IA. Cl't25U
(lfTUnl-2W-J7lI.1 r-~1IWl
~
~
!l
I
f~ \
~O I
:~
'1:
r
+~
J"-o~
()
o
Z
()
ill
-I
m
01.
r
o
~
~I
~I
:iO
2'
~
r
~.
l> ~
-4 :00
(Jl
-I
iO
m
m
-I
;I~ ;I~
Iii Iii
~
%
I
I
I
I
y-..
f'-O.
~
~!: CJ
~~~ ~
~~ ~
G\Z
z-l
G\-
r~~
~g
::;:~
8111 WAlL A"ISH ~
C
ffi ~
....,
~5
~()
m
OJ
m
z
()
m
11
r
l>
Z
~
m
E
"
~ "
:2~ €x
l~&~ i~
~~to ~-
....'l~ ;; ~i!i
O~J>.O a."
~~~9
...~
o~
:i;
p
..
"
~
"
:I~::> .
I> .
~n:~~
t-X
;!...-
Q.
~~~
~. (j
"DO'
j;'"
i~~
,,-/\
III
f~
'0
~Q
~,.
m
Z
()
m
.,..
m
()
-I
~
in
r
m
<
J>
-I
~
~
liii ! ~U ~i!~ ~~ ~~
2hi ~ 9~ ~I F! ~~
~ ~ ~i
-\
i
.......,
~~
;,Z
~~
-I
:iO
-<
m
r
m
<
J>
-I
~
I~
~"
~
~
AGE OA ITEM NO.
PAGE '10
s
OF 30
"-'
MAURICE A. UMANAH
12531 PALM ST.
LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530
~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
PREPARED BY:
PROJECT TITLE:
~
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
PROJECT REQUEST
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
JUNE 6, 2006 r-
/> ()VVle Zo
MATTHEW C. HARRIS, SENIOR PLANNER
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-23 &
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-10
FOR A "7-ELEVEN" CONVENIENCE STORE AND
GASOLINE DISPENSING ESTABLISHMENT
WITH ONSITE BEER AND WINE SALES.
GLEN DAIGLE, OAK GROVE EQUITIES, 28991
OLD TOWN FRONT STREET, TEMECULA, CA
92590
TERRA COTTA PROPERTIES LLC
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to establish a "gasoline
dispensing establishment" and to allow onsite beer and wine sales. In addition, a
Commercial Design Review consideration is being requested for a 2,960 square foot
convenience store, a 3,096 square foot canopy and associated improvements relative to
a gas station/mini-mart establishment within the General Commercial (C-2) zoning
district pursuant to Chapters 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits), 17.38 (Non-Residential
Development Standards), and 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code (LEMC).
~
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE \
b
OF 4~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
"""""'"
Proj ect
Site
Developing Shopping
Center
North
Developing Shopping
Center
South
Business Park
East
Developing Shopping
Center
West
Developing Shopping
Center
PROJECT LOCATION
General
Commercial
C-2
General
Commercial
C-2
Commercial
Manufacturing
.CM
General
Commercial
(C-2)
General
Commercial
C-2
General
Commercial (GC)
General
Commercial (GC)
Business Park (BP)
General
Commercial (GC)
......,
General
Commercial (GC)
The proposed project is located on the northwest comer of Central and Collier
Avenue(s) within the Oak Grove (''Target'') Crossing Shopping Center, Assessor's
Parcel Number 377-120-007. '
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Siting
The applicant is proposing to construct a 2,960 square foot 7-Eleven convenience store
and associated three (3) island gas station with six -( 6) pumps and an associated canopy
on a .98 acre vacant site. The layout of the facility, as proposed, locates the gas pumps
.......,
AGENDA,lTEM ~
PAGE ~ OF ~i
,......
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
and canopy at the comer of the property along the intersection of Collier and Central
Avenue(s). The convenience store would be located approximately seventy-feet (70')
to the west of the intersection along the Central Avenue frontage. A total of twenty-
eight (28) onsite parking spaces are proposed with a row of parking and a drive aisle
separating the convenience store from the gas pumps. The applicant has indicated that
private shopping center Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C C & R' s) have been
recorded for the shopping center site, which dictate a specific envelope in which
buildings/structures must be placed onsite (see overall project site plan).
Onsite Circulation
Access into the site will be achieved from two (2) driveways located off Central and
Collier Avenue(s) respectively.
,.,-...
Building Architecture
The architectural style of the convenience store and canopy can be identified as a
"Timeless Contemporary" design which matches the style of the overall shopping
center. All the buildings within the center have been architecturally designed to
incorporate common and distinct elements that can be found throughout the center,
providing a sense of continuity and identification.
The building architecture, as proposed, consists of a rectangular floor plan with a
raised main entry element with stoned face columns that extend eight-feet (8') from the
body of the building creating a covered entry. Parapet walls along the sides are
articulated with one and one-half (1 ~') to two foot (2') deep stone faced columns with
three foot (3') deep stone faced columns on the rear elevation. A partial stone building
base and decorative trellis features have been utilized on side and rear elevations.
Decorative light fixtures will also be provided. A separate solid 36' x 86' canopy
structure is proposed over the fuel islands with a 15' -8" clearance between the bottom
of the canopy and the paved surface below. Each ofthe three (3) support columns will
be treated with architectural stone. The proposed canopy lighting will be recessed into
the canopy structure.
/'""
AGENDA ITEM ~
PAGE20F JU
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
.......,
Landscaping
Twenty-five percent (25%) of the project site has been landscaped, which far exceeds
the minimum ten percent (10%) landscape requirement. The bulk of the landscaping
occurs along the Central and Collier Avenue frontages, including a variety ofPlatnus
Acerifolia, Pinus Canariensis and Lagerstroemia trees ranging in size from 15 gallon to
(24") box. The trees are to be planted approximately thirty feet (30') on center with
shrubs and groundcover below in a minimum fifteen foot (15') wide green belt.
Another large planter area would occur on the west side of the convenience store and
would include various trees and shrubbery. Finally six (6) trees (Chinese Elm and
Rhaphiolepis) will be planted within parking lot planters to provide shade, with shrubs
and groundcover below.
Colors and Materials
The exterior of the convenience store building and pump island canopy will consist
primarily of stucco with El Dorado Stone at the building base and columns. In
addition, decorative metal trellis structures and exposed wood rafters will be used on
all elevations. A metal storefront with glazing will occur along the front elevation of
the building.
.~
Sign Program Modification
The existing sign program for the shopping center in which the project site is located
does not address gasoline dispensing establishments. Therefore, staff requested that
the applicant provide a revised sign program. Should the Planning Commission
support the proposed project; the sign program will be brought to the next Planning
Commission meeting for consideration.
Sale of Beer and Wine
The 7- Eleven Corporation is also requesting to sell beer and wine within their
proposed convenience store. Although the store will operate 24 hours per day, beer
and wine will only be sold between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 2:00 A.M. As
normally required, all employees who sell beer and wine must undergo a training
.......,
AGENDA ITEM ~
PAGE lL OF .!J.
r""
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
program which provides them the proper procedures for selling alcoholic beverages.
LEMC Section 17.38.090.0. requires establishments engaged in the concurrent sale of
motor vehicle fuel and alcoholic beverages be subject to the acquisition of a
Conditional Use Permit. Considering this, a Type 20 "Off Sale Beer and Wine" license
must be obtained from the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC).
The license authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption off the premises
where sold. The license would also allow minors on the premises. In addition,
pursuant to Section 17.38.070 (Sale of Alcoholic Beverages) of the LEMC, the
proposed project will need to meet and abide by the criteria listed below:
1. No beer or wine shall be displayed within five feet (5') of the cash register or
the front door unless it is in a permanently afflXed cooler.
,......
2. No sale or display of beer or wine shall be made from an ice tub.
3. No beer or wine advertising shall be located on motor fuel islands and no self-
illuminated advertising for wine or beer shall be located on buildings or
windows.
4. No advertisement of alcoholic beverages shall be displayed at motor fuel
islands.
5. No sale of alcoholic beverages shall be made from a drive-in window.
6. Employees on duty between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. shall be at least twenty-
one (21) years of age to sell beer and wine.
The 7-Eleven Corporation has stated that they intend to strictly adhere to the above
LEMC conditions with regards to the sale of alcoholic beverages if this project were
approved.
r--
AGENDA ITEM b
PAGE 2. OF Jil
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
'--'
BACKGROUND
In March of 2005 the City Council approved General Plan Amendment No. 2004-02,
Zone Change No. 2004-02, Tentative Parcel Map No. 33056 and Commercial Design
Review No. 2004-12 for the Oak Grove Crossing ("Target") Shopping Center on a
14.4 acre site located at the northwest comer of Collier and Central Avenue(s). The
shopping center included a Target store as well as shops, pads and various
improvements. The project site (Pad A) was included in the overall shopping center
approval however, because the pad had not been leased by a specific tenant at that
time, the site layout and building architecture were both subject to future design review
approval and environmental review which the applicant has now applied for with these
applications.
ANAL YSIS
Siting
'--'
The intersection of Collier and Central Avenue(s), at which the project site is located,
is emerging into one of the City's main commercial areas given its proximity to
Interstate-IS and several large newly constructed shopping centers. Given the project
site location and its prominence, staff believes that a high quality site design is
warranted. The proposed gas station, characterized by large areas of paving, gas
pumping equipment and hoses, which staff believes does not achieve a high aesthetic
value, considering the gas station canopy, as proposed, will be the most prominent
feature on the northwest comer of Collier & Central Avenue(s).
The Lake Elsinore General Plan, Community Design Element, Commercial Citywide
Design Guidelines, Section 1.b.1 lists the following Design Layout and Siting
Guidelines:
· "A varied street setback is preferred to encourage creative building
orientation. "
· "Vary and articulate shapes and forms of buildings and other structural
elements to create visual interest."
'--'
AGENDA ITEM b
PAGE-.k.OF ~~
~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
· "Entry on to the site and connection with buildings should be enhanced
through landscape, hardscape and architectural design."
Based on the project site location and aesthetic issues associated with the proposed
uses, staff believes that a standard gas station design, i.e. gas pumps, pavement and
canopy should not be the most dominant visual feature at this busy street intersection.
Moreover, staff believes that the site design, as proposed, is not consistent with the
Siting Guidelines listed above. Instead, staff recommends that the convenience store
be relocated closer to the Collier Avenue frontage and that significant architectural
features be incorporated into the building given its high visibility. Consequently, the
gas pumps, canopy and large paved area would then be relocated into the interior of the
site resulting in a creative building orientation with varying building forms and
setbacks thereby creating visual interest for both the motorist and pedestrian alike.
~
The applicant was made aware of staff s position regarding the site design very early in
the application process. However, as indicated in a March 20, 2006 correspondence
from Mr. Mark Haines of7-Eleven (See Attachment 3) the lessee is wholly opposed to
relocating the gas pumps, sighting both visibility needs and security issues.
Patron Visibility Issue
The lessee believes that the pump islands must be located at the comer of the site in
order to be adequately seen by passing motorists. However, staff believes that
adequate area exist onsite to relocate the convenience store closer to the Collier
A venue frontage while still allowing "lines of sight" to be achieved between the pumps
and motorists traveling either north or southbound on Collier and west on Central
Avenue. It should also be noted that the proposed Sign Program for the shopping
center allows for a freestanding monument sign with gas pricing being located on both
the Central and Collier Avenue frontages which will further serve to put motorists on
notice that a gas station exists on the project site. Therefore, staff believes the pump
islands will have sufficient visibility and that it is not necessary that they be located at
the comer of the site as requested.
",..-
AGENDA ITEM b
PAGEloF~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
"""
Public Safety Issue
Both the lessee and Lake Elsinore Police Chief Louis Fetherolf concur that the front of
the convenience store should be fully visible from both the Central and Collier Avenue
frontages. The Chief has indicated that should a robbery occur onsite police units
would likely arrive on scene from either south along Collier A venue or from the west
along Central Avenue. Therefore, it is essential that the front of the store be visible
from both of those vantage points. Again, staff believes there is additional area onsite
to locate the convenience store closer to the Collier Avenue frontage while orienting
the front of the building to the Collier and Central Avenue intersection as requested by
the Police Department.
Although, staff has provided the applicant's architect with various suggestions on how
to modify the site design, 7- Eleven Corporation has been either unable or unwilling to
make any modifications to their prototype building floor plan. Staff understands that
there are both design and operational restrictions which serve to limit the layout
options for the site (i.e. building envelope restriction and fuel truck delivery route).
Given these restrictions, staff would question whether a single use would be more
appropriate onsite such as a single retail user or restaurant rather than a convenience
store and gas station combination.
~
In conclusion, staff believes the street intersection at which the project site is located
serves as one of the City's main commercial corridors which demand's an attractive
site layout and architectural design. In addition, it is staff s belief that a gas station
with its associated large paving field and mechanical equipment does not qualify as a
"high quality" development. It does not appear that the applicant and lessee are willing
to work with staffin achieving the applicable site design guidelines as specified in the
Community Design Element of the City General Plan; therefore, staff recommends that
the proposed project be denied.
Architecture
The Lake Elsinore General Plan, Community Design Element, Commercial Citywide
Design Guidelines, Section l.b.2 lists the following Architectural Guidelines:
""
AGENDA ITEM b
PAGE-1-0F~
~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
· Use of materials which convey permanence, substance, timeliness and
restraint should be encouraged.
· Architectural interest should be created by reducing the appearance of
excessive massing and visually articulating exterior building walls.
· Roof planes should be used to articulate and reduce building mass.
In association with the Development Review Committee (DRC) process staff worked
with the applicant to achieve a variety of architectural enhancements. However, upon
reviewing the latest revised plans staff has identified the following outstanding
architectural issues:
~,
Building Articulation
Staff had determined that minimal wall articulation was provided along the side and
rear building elevations of the convenience store and subsequently requested that
minimum three foot (3') deep insets or pop-outs be provided to break-up the building
footprint. While the applicant has since provided three foot (3 ') deep pop-out columns
on the rear elevations, only one and one half foot (1 ~') to two foot (2') pop-out
columns are still proposed along the side elevations which staff believes is not
adequate in breaking up the box like appearance of the building.
Parapet Treatments
Staff also expressed concern regarding the lack of roofline variation along the side and
rear elevations and requested that parapet heights or cornice treatments be incorporated
to break-up the rooflines as was done with the other shop and pad buildings in the
shopping center. To date, no parapet roofline variations have been incorporated into
the building design.
Building Materials
~
Staffhad determined that the building design initially submitted lacked significant wall
AGENDA ITEM t
PAGE~OF ~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
~
materials on side and rear elevations. Additional materials were requested such as
decorative trellis structures, spandrel glass, and architectural stone. While the applicant
has since added architectural stone and decorative trellis structures on the elevations, it
does not appear that the trellis structures are intended to .be vegetated as previously
requested by staff. Staff believes that vegetation on the trellis structures is essential in
order to further break-up and soften the straight wall planes within the columns located
on both the side and rear elevations.
Additional Landscaping
Sixteen (16) additional parking spaces have been provided onsite above and beyond
the twelve (12) spaces required by the LEMC. Staff had requested that the applicant
eliminate six (6) of the spaces and replace the spaces with additional landscaping
onsite to enhance the aesthetics of the site given the large number of surplus parking
spaces that are being requested. The latest plans submitted do not show any parking
space reduction onsite as requested.
.....,
Landscape Island
LEMC Section 17.66.100 .F. requires that parking and driveway areas in commercial
zones shall be separated from buildings by a landscaped planter. Subsequently, staff
had requested that the landscaping and site plans be modified to show the convenience
store sitting on an "island of landscaping" except where building entrances occur.
While the applicant has incorporated additional landscaping around the building, staff
believes the landscape planters provided at the front of the store serve to block
pedestrian access from at least three (3) adjacent parking spaces to the store entrance.
Instead staff believes the planters should be relocated directly adjacent to the front
building wall with the walkway located between the planter and the top of the parking
spaces. Moreover, staff feels the proposed landscape planter on the interior side
elevation of the building, which is less than two feet (2') in width, is much too narrow
and does not meet the intent of the Zoning Code in terms o~usability and effectiveness.
While the applicant did work with staff to improve the architectural design of the
building and canopy, staff does not believe that the enhancements proposed by the
architect are significant enough to be consistent with the applicable architectural design
.....,
AGENDA ITEM b
PAGE1QOF ~b
,.....
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
guidelines in the Community Design Element of the City General Plan listed above.
Proposed Alcohol Sales
In determining the potential impact for a Type 20 "off-site" beer and wine sales the
Planning Commission may consider the following: (A) concentration of "off-sale"
liquor establishments, (B) crime rate within the subject census tract, and (C) distance
from sensitive uses. Moreover, in order for the Alcohol Beverage Control Board
(ABC) to approve the license request, the City must first approve a Conditional Use
Permit.
Concentration of Liquor Establishments
~
The ABC has indicated that a total often (10) active Type 20 (off-sale beer and wine)
or Type 21 (off-sale general) licenses currently exist within Census Tract No.
60650430.06 as listed on the table below and shown on the attached map (see
Attachment 4).
OFF PREMISE ALCOHOL SALES LOCATIONS
WITHIN CENSUS TRACT NO. 0430.06
1 16750 Lakeshore Stater Brothers Type 21 (sale of general
Drive alcohol for off-site
consum tion
2 16851 12 Arco AM/PM Type 21 (sale of general
Lakeshore Drive alcohol for off-site
consum tion
3 217 N. Main Ibarra's Market Type 20 (sale of beer and
Street WIlle for off-site
consum tion
4 16830 Lakeshore Chevron Type 20 (sale of beer and
~ Drive WIlle for off-site
consum tion
AGENDA ITEM ~
PAGE1LOF ~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
'-'
5 113 W Graham M&M Liquor Type 21 (sale of general
Avenue alcohol for off-site
consumption)
6 16770 Lakeshore La Mexicana Meat Type 20 (sale of beer and
Drive Market WIlle for off-site
consumption)
7 1006 W Graham Lake Star Food Store Type 20 (sale of beer
Avenue and wine for off-site
consumption)
8 19930 Collier Arco AM/PM Type 20 (sale of beer
Avenue and wine for off-site
consumption)
9 200 W Graham Arco AM/PM Type 20 (sale of beer
and wine for off-site
consumption)
10 30850 Riverside . Country Store and Type 20 (sale of beer
Drive Deli and wine for off-site
consumption)
"'"
In addition to the establishments listed above, there are five (5) additional off-premise
alcohol establishments outside of Census Tract 0430.06 that are within ~ mile of the
subject property: Central Market and Liquor (29280 Central Avenue), Costco (29315
Central Avenue), Arco AM/PM (29355 Central Avenue), Chevron (18451 Dexter
Avenue) and Mobil (29300 Central Avenue).
The bulk of these existing license holders are either located within the area of
Lakeshore and Riverside Drive or Graham Avenue and Main Street, some distance
from the project site. However, three (3) license holders exist within one-half mile of
the project site, all of which are convenience stores. ABC has indicated that a
maximum of three (3) license holders are allowed at anyone time within the census
tract boundary. With ten (10) active license holders, ABC has indicated that the census
tract is currently over concentrated.
"'"
AGENDA ITEM f,
PAGE~OF~
"......
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
Census Tract Crime Rate
With regard to area crime rates, Police Chief Fetherolf indicates that the census tract in
which the project site is located is designated as a high crime rate area by the State of
California. In addition, the Chief has stated that alcohol sales associated with
convenience stores tend to have more crime activities than alcohol sold in a larger
supermarket given that the convenience store purchase is more immediate. In addition,
the sale often occurs solely for the purchase of alcohol to be consumed in the near term
rather than later. Therefore, Chief Fetherolf does not support the approval of the
requested Conditional Use Permit for onsite beer and wine sales (see Attachment 5).
Proximity to Sensitive Uses
Staff has determined that no sensitive uses (schools, parks, hospitals, churches) are
located within close proximity (600 feet) to the project site. Therefore, no significant
impacts are anticipated.
",..--
Given that the project site is located within a census tract that has already been
declared over concentrated in terms of the number of off-site alcohol sales
establishments and given that the project site is located within a designated high crime
area, staff recommends that the requested Conditional Use Permit for onsite beer and
wine sale be denied. However, should the Commission choose to support and approve
the Conditional Use Permit, ABC still also requires that the City Council consider and
adopt Findings of Convenience or Necessity in order for ABC to issue the "off-sale
beer and wine license".
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed
development of a convenience store and associated gas station is not a project given
that it is recommended that the project be denied. However, should the Commission
and City Council wish to approve the Conditional Use Permit and Commercial Design
Review, an environmental determination must first be made and necessary
,,-- environmental analysis undertaken.
AGENDA ITEM ,
PAGE \') OF -.h.~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
...."
CONCLUSION
Although the applicant's plans demonstrate some physical and aesthetic qualities, staff
believes that Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-23 and Commercial Design Review No.
2005-10 are deficient in that:
1. The proposed 7-Eleven and gas station is characterized by large areas of paving,
fuel pumps, and a gas station canopy directly fronting Central Avenue and Collier
Avenue. Uses of this type encourage site plans that provide marginal aesthetic
quality, which is a concern for an emerging major commercial intersection within
the City of Lake Elsinore.
2. Existing CC&R's on the subject property and prototype 7-Eleven floor plans limit
the areas where a building can be placed on the site and therefore inhibits a proper
layout for multiple structures (convenience store and gas station canopy).
...."
3. The proposed architectural design fails to create a visually pleasing, non-detractive
relationship between the proposed and existing projects in the area due to the lack
of building articulation, lack of architectural interest along highly visible street
frontages, and insufficient onsite landscaping to frame and soften the proposed
structures.
4. According to the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, the Census
Tract is over concentrated with off-premise beer and wine locations and the
Riverside County Sheriff office has indicated that the subject property is located
within a high crime area.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt; Resolution No. 2006-_,
denying Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-23 for the proposed gasoline dispensing
establishment, adopt; Resolution No. 2006-_ denying the request for "onsite" beer
and wine sales and adopt Resolution No. 2006-_ recommending to the City Council
denial of Commercial Design Review R 2005-10 for a convenience store and gas
"....,
AGENDA ITEM ~
PAGE '''' OF ...h'i
~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
station based the following Findings and Exhibits.
FINDINGS
Conditional Use Permit (Gas Station)
1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in
accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning
district in which the site is located.
/'"
The proposed Conditional Use Permit for a gas station located within Assessor
Parcel Number(s) 377-120-007 does not comply with the goals and objectives of
the General Plan in that the site design and building architecture proposed for the
facility do not comply with the City Wide Design Guidelines as specified in Sections
1 b.1 and 1.b.2 of the Community Design Element. The proposed gas station is
characterized by large areas of pavement and mechanical equipment and hoses
which do not achieve a high quality aesthetic value and therefore, should not be the
prominent feature of the highly traveled street intersection.
2. The proposed use will be not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort,
or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the
proposed use or the City, or injurious to property or improvements in the
neighborhood or the City.
In accord with the purposes of the Chapter 17. 74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City realizes that the proposed gas station
located at Assessor Parcel Number 377-120-007 may have a potential to negatively
. impact the welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood or the
City. The subject site is located within a Census Tract that is over concentrated
with a total often (10) Type 20 or Type 21 license active holders. The proposed
facility is not consistent with Citywide Design Guidelines and the Community
Design Element of the General Plan.
3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use,
and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other
features required by Title 17 of the LEMC.
,,-...
AGENDA ITEM ~
PAGEJ2.0F ~l
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
The proposed Conditional Use Permit for a gas station located at Assessor Parcel
Number(s) 377-120-007 does not comply with Design Directive sections
17.82.060.A&B of the LEMC given that the facility, as designed, does not
sufficiently create interest at this major commercial intersection for persons
moving along the street. Moreover, the proposed design concept does not create a
visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and existing
projects in the area given that the project lacks significant building articulation
and architectural interest and a sufficient amount of onsite landscaping to frame
and soften proposed structures.
4. The site fqr the proposed use does relate to streets and highways with proper design
both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic
generated by the subject use.
The proposed Conditional Use Permit for the establishment of a gas station located
at APN 377-120-007, has been reviewed as to its relation to the width and type of
pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated, in that the City
has adequately evaluated the potential impacts associated with the proposed uses
prior to its approval and has conditioned the project to be served by roads of
adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car, truck,
transit, and bicycle.
5. In approving the subject use located at APN 377-120-007, there will be no adverse
affect on abutting property or the permitted and normal use thereof.
The proposed use has been thoroughly reviewed and conditioned by all
applicable City Departments and outside Agencies, eliminating the potential for
any and all adverse effects on the abutting property.
6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.74.50 of the LEMC
have been incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Permit to insure
that the use continues in a manner envisioned by these.findings for the term of the
use.
Pursuant to Section 17.74.050 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed Conditional Use Permit for the
establishment of a gas station facility located at APN 377-120-007, has been
scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission.
AGENDA ITEM -.b
PAGE 11. OF -Y1
.....,b
....,
....,
,,-...
r"'
,,-...
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
Conditional Use Permit (Alcohol Sales)
1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in
accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning
district in which the site is located.
The proposed use for the sale of alcoholic beverages may be detrimental to the
general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or
working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or injurious to
property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City. The location of the
proposed use has been found to be within a designated high crime area and is
within a census tract deemed over concentrated with alcohol sales licenses.
Accordingly, there are a sufficient number of businesses that provide the public
with lor;ations to buy alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption and an
additional location will have no benefit to the community.
2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort,
or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of
the proposed use or the City, or injurious to property or improvements in the
neighborhood or the City.
In accord with the purposes of the Chapter 17. 74 (Conditional Use Permits) of
the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City realizes that the proposed alcohol
sales located at Assessor Parcel Number 377-120-007 may have a potential to
negatively impact the welfare of persons residing or working within the
neighborhood or the City. The location of the proposed use has been found to
be within a designated high crime area and is within a census tract deemed over
concentrated with alcohol sales licenses. A continuing proliferation of off
premise alcohol sale establishments results in a diminution of the quality of life
for neighboring business owners and workers.
3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers
and other features required by Title 17 of the LEMC.
The proposed alcohol use located at Assessor Parcel Number 377-120-007 does
not comply with Design Directive sections 17.82.060.A&B of the LEMC given
AGENDA ITEM b
PAGE \\. OF ~1
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
~
that the facility, as designed, does not sufficiently create interest at this major
commercial intersection for persons moving along the street. Moreover, the
proposed design concept does not create a visually pleasing, non-detractive
relationship between the proposed and existing projects in the area given that
the project lacks significant building articulation and architectural interest and
lacks a sufficient amount of onsite landscaping to frame and soften proposed
structures.
4. The site for the proposed use does relate to streets and highways with proper
design both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of
traffic generated by the subject us~.
The proposed alcohol use located at Assessor Parcel Number 377-120-007 has
been reviewed as to its relation to the width and type of pavement needed to
carry the type and quantity of traffic generated, in that the City has adequately
evaluated the potential impacts associated with the proposed uses prior to its
approval and has conditioned the commercial project to be served by roads of
adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car,. "-II'
truck, transit, and bicycle.
5. In approving the subject use located at Assessor Parcel Number 377-040-027
there will be no adverse affect on abutting property or the permitted and normal
use thereof.
The proposed use has been thoroughly reviewed by all applicable City
Departments and outside Agencies. The location of the proposed use for alcohol
sales is within a designated high crime area and within a census tract that has
been deemed over concentrated with alcohol sales licenses by the State
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Therefore, the potential does exist
for any and all adverse effects on the abutting property.
6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.74.50 of the LEMC
have been incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Permit to insure
that the use continues in a manner envisioned by these findings for the term of
the use.
Pursuant to Section 17.74.050 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed alcohol sales located at
Assessor Parcel Number 363-670-002 has been scheduled for consideration and ~
AGENDA J-TEM b
PAGE Th OF !i&
,.,....
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
approval of the Planning Commission.
Commercial Desh!D Review
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the
General Plan, and the Zoning District in which the project is located.
The proposed Commercial Design Review for a convenience store and
associated gas station located within Assessor Parcel Number(s) 377-120-007
does not comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan in that the
site design and building architecture proposed for the facility do not comply
with the City Wide Design Guidelines as specified in Sections 1 b.1 and 1. b. 2 of
the Community Design Element. The proposed design does not provide the
adequate amount of building articulation, building materials or onsite
landscaping necessary to sufficiently enhance the aesthetics of the site.
,r-
~
2. The project does comply with the design directives contained in Section
17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The proposed Commercial Design Review for a convenience store and
associated gas station located at Assessor Parcel Number(s) 377-120-007 does
not comply with Design Directive sections 17.82.060.A&B given that the
facility, as designed, does not sufficiently create interest at this major
commercial intersection for persons moving along the street. Moreover, the
proposed design concept does not create a visually pleasing, non-detractive
relationship between the proposed and existing projects in the area given that
the project lacks significant building articulation and architectural interest and
a sufficient amount of onsite landscaping to frame and soften proposed
structures.
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not
anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
The proposed Commercial Design Review for a convenience store and
associated gas station, located at Assessor Parcel Number 377-120-007 is being
recommended for denial and therefore, does not constitute a project as defined
by the California Environmental Quality Act. Should the Planning Commission
and City Council choose to support the project, an environmental determination
AGENDA ITEM ~
PAGEftOF ~3
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
~
and necessary environmental analysis must be undertaken prior to
reconsideration.
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code,
including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been
incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of
the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed Commercial Design Review
located at Assessor Parcel Number(s) 377-120-007 has been scheduled for
consideration and approval of the Planning Commission.
PREPARED BY:
MATTHEW C. HARRIS, SENIOR PLANNER
APPROVED BY:
....,
Rolfe M. Preisendanz,
Director of Community Development
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
LOCATION MAP
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIONS
MARCH 20, 2006 7-ELEVEN LETTER
RETAIL LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT MAP
POLICE CHIEF FETHEROLF LETTER
EXHIBITS
. REDUCTIONS (8 ~ xII)
Exhibit A Site Plan
Exhibit B Floor Plan
Exhibit C Building Elevations
Exhibit D Roof Plan
......"
AGENDA ITEM ~
PAGE ~OF ~b
r"
~
r-
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 6, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: 7-ELEVEN STORE AND GAS STATION
Exhibit E Cross-Sections
Exhibit F Landscaping Plan
Exhibit G Grading Plan
· FULL SIZE PLAN SET
AGENDA ITEM f...
PAGE.2l0F~
VICINITY MAP
CONDITIONALUSE PERMIT NO. 2005-23
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-10
7-ELEVEN CONVENIENCE STORE AND GAS STATION
""
/
~.
.......,
~
/~
.......,
PLANNING COMMISSION
1\eENDA lT~MNO. -,...i}o" . <...'
'PACE-..2~ of.-..4'&.
".....
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DENYING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-23 FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF A GAS STATION
FACILITY
WHEREAS, Glen Daigle, Oak Grove Equities mc, has initiated
proceedings for Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-23 for the establishment and
operation of a gas station facility with related improvements at APN 377-120-007;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of tl;le City of Lake Elsinore has
been delegated with the responsibility of approving or denying Conditional Use
Permits; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the
,.,.- Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and interested parties at a public hearing held with
respect to this item on June 6, 2006.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered Conditional Use
Permit No. 2005-23 prior to making a decision to deny the proposed establishment
and operation of a gas station facility. The Planning Commission finds and
determines that the proposal is not a project under California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) provisions and is therefore not subject to environmental
analysis.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law and
the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the denial of the Conditional
Use Permit No. 2005-23 have been made as follows:
1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in
",,--, accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning
district in which the site is located.
ACENDA ITEM NO.
PAOE ~3 OF
6
41
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
PAGE20F4
The proposed Conditional Use Permit for a gas station located within Assessor
Parcel Number(s) 377-120-007 does not comply with the goals and objectives
of the General Plan in that the site design and building architecture proposed
for the facility do not comply with the City Wide Design Guidelines as specified
in Sections 1b.1 and 1.b.2 of the Community Design Element. The proposed gas
station is characterized by large areas of pavement and mechanical equipment
and hoses which do not achieve a high quality aesthetic value and therefore,
should not be the prominent feature of the highly traveled street intersection.
2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort,
or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of
the proposed use or the City, or injurious to property or improvements in the
neighborhood or the City.
In accord with the purposes of the Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of
the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City realizes that the proposed gas
station located at Assessor Parcel Number 377-120-007 may have a potential to
negatively impact the welfare of persons residing or. working within the
neighborhood or the City. The proposed facility is not consistent with the
Citywide Design Guidelines and the Community Design Element of the General
Plan.
3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and
other features required by Title 17 of the LEMC.
The proposed Conditional Use Permit for a gas station located at Assessor
Parcel Number(s) 377-120-007 does not comply with Design Directive
Sections 17.82.060.A&B of the LEMC given that the facility, as designed, does
not sufficiently create interest at this major commercial intersection for
persons moving along the street. Moreover, the proposed design concept does
not create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the
proposed and existing projects in the area given that the project lacks
significant building articulation and architectural interest and a sufficient
amount of onsite landscaping to frame and soften proposed structures.
4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design
both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic
generated by the subject use.
The proposed Conditional Use Permit for the establishment of a gas station
ACENDA ITEM No. b
PACE Q~ OF ~~
..."
.."
...."
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE30F4 -
,...-
,...-
located at APN 377-120-007, has been reviewed as to its relation to the width
and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated,
in that the City has adequately evaluated the potential impacts associated with
the proposed uses prior to its approval and has conditioned the project to be
served by roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide
reasonable access by car, truck, transit, and bicycle.
5. In approving the subject use located at APN 377-120-007, there will be no
adverse affect on abutting property or the permitted and normal use thereof.
The proposed use has been thoroughly reviewed and can be conditioned by all
applicable City Departments and outside Agencies, eliminating the potential for
any and all adverse effects on the abutting property.
6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.74.50 of the LEMC
have been incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Permi~ to
insure that the use continues in a manner envisioned by these findings for the
term of the use.
Pursuant to Section 17.74.050 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake
Elsin'ore Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed Conditional Use Permit for the
establishment of a gas station facility located at APN 377-120-007, has been
scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission.
SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this sixth day of June 2006, by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
,...-
. . "~'M NO I
',Y"'- <~... >. . ~ . 6
AGi;;,NuJ-\ \ i c .___....,,---
. PAGE ~S OF~~ L.1
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
PAGE40F4
ATTEST:
Rolfe Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PACE ~ b OF
6
~~
......",
......",
~
""......
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DENYING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-23 FOR THE
CONCURRENT SALE OF MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL WITH
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES LOCATED AT ASSESSOR
PARCEL NO. 377-120-007.
WHEREAS, Oak Grove Equities Inc., has initiated proceedings in
accordance with LEMC Section 17.38.090.0. to request the approval for the sale
of alcoholic (beer and wine) beverages for off-site consumption within a
convenience store and gas station proposed on the northwest comer of Collier
Avenue and Central A venue; and
,-.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has
been delegated with the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Permits; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the
Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with
respect to this item on June 6, 2006.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed
Conditional Use Permit 2005-23. The Planning Commission finds and determines
that the proposal is not a project given that is recommended for denial and
therefore is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
provisions, based on the following findings and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and
the City of Lake Elsinore, the following findings for the denial of Conditional Use
Permit No. 2005-23 have been made as follows:
FINDINGS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is
r- in accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the
planning district in which the site is located.
ACENDA ITEM NO.
PACE ~LOF
b
~l>
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
PAGE20F4
The proposed use for the sale of alcoholic beverages may be detrimental to
the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or
working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or
injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City. The
location of the proposed use has been found to be within a designated high
crime area and is within a census tract deemed over concentrated with
alcohol sales licenses. Accordingly, there are a sufficient number of
businesses that provide the public with locations to buy alcoholic beverages
for off-premise consumption and an additional location will have no benefit
to the community.
2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety,
comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working within the
neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or injurious to property or
improvements in the neighborhood or the City.
In accord with the purposes of the Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits)
of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City realized that the proposed
alcohol sales located at Assessor Parcel Number 377-120-007 may have a
potential to negatively impact the welfare of persons residing or working
within the neighborhood or the City. The location of the proposed use has
been found to be within a State designated high crime area and is within a
census tract deemed over concentrated with alcoholic sales licenses.
3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers
and other features required by Title 17 of the LEMC.
The proposed alcohol use located at Assessor Parcel Number 377-120-007
does not comply with Design Directives sections 17.82.060.A&B of the
LEMC given that the facility, as designed, does not sufficiently create
interest at this major commercial intersection for persons and motorists
moving along the street. Moreover, the proposed design concept does not
create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed
and existing projects in the area given that the project lacks significant
building articulation and architectural interest and lacks a sufficient amount
of onsite landscaping to frame and soften proposed structures.
4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper
design both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity
of traffic generated by the subject use.
ACENDA'TEM NO. 6
PACE~OF 41
....."
'-""
'-'"
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
PAGE 3 OF4
~
The proposed alcohol use located at Assessor Parcel Number 377-120-007
has been reviewed as to its relation to the width and type of pavement
needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated, in that the City
has adequately evaluated the potential impacts associated with the proposed
uses prior to its approval and has conditioned the project to be served by
roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable
access by car, truck, transit, and bicycle.
S. In approving the subject use located at Assessor Parcel Number 377-120-
007 there will be no adverse affect on abutting property or the permitted and
normal use thereof.
The proposed use has been thoroughly reviewed by all applicable City
Departments and outside agencies. The location of the proposed use for
alcohol sales is within a State designated high crime area and within a
census tract that has been deemed over concentrated with alcohol sales
licenses by the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Therefore,
the potential does exist for any and all adverse effects on the abutting
property.
~ 6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.74.50 of the
LEMC have been incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use
Permit to insure that the use continues in a manner envisioned by these
findings for the term of the use.
Pursuant to Section 17.74.050 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed alcohol sales located
at Assessor Parcel Number 377-120-007 has been scheduled for
consideration and approval of the Planning Commission.
SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this sixth day of June, 2006, by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
,.........
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
ACENDA lTEM NO. b
PAGE 'a, OF ~l
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE40F4
ATTEST:
Rolfe Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
AGENDA ITEM NO. b
PAGE 30 OF 40
"-""
.....,
.....,
r-
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE' DENIAL OF A COMMERCIAL DESIGN
REVIEW NO. 2005-10 FOR A 7-ELEVEN CONVENIENCE
STORE AND AN ASSOCIATED GAS STATION WITHIN THE
OAK GROVE CROSSING SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED
AT APN 377-120-007.
WHEREAS, Glen Daigle, Oak Grove Equities Inc. has initiated
proceedings for Commercial Design Review No. 2005-10 for the design and
construction of a 7-E1even convenience store and an associated gas station with
related improvements located at APN 377-120-007; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has
been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City
Council for Design Reviews; and
F', WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the
Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with
respect to this item on June 6, 2006.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered Commercial
Design Review No. 2005-10 prior to making a decision to recommend that the City
Council deny the proposed convenience store and gas station. The Planning
Commission finds and determines that the proposal is not a project given that it is
being recommended for denial and therefore is not subject to California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provisions.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law and
the City of Lake Elsinore, the following findings for the denial of the Commercial
Design Review No. 2005-10 have been made as follows:
~'I 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the
General Plan, and the Zoning District in which the project is located.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PACE 3 \ OF
t
l\~
I
I I
· , " 'I" I I" , '\:" 'I i I r' I I"j , ':' . ~ ~ '
I : ~ II ~ ~!J";!]i~T\~~~~'f .-_~ ==
i I I .... ....... ............ "~i ~e ~ i .~ ~ ;
== :' : "'" .....'"" "'" ., _ -== 0
II ~ I - - ~
i I i ~ ' :: ," ~ ! .~ ~ : ! = = -
'I ii' . ti:,.,--,~;, .:~: f ~ '. I
I ::::::::::::::::::::::::: ....f: e rf f-:: - - D
r I lli?t~tIl~(k~! ~r:~ = --
i j:'" ,;.,,~ - ! - : ! - =
i i L~ ~.~..t@V h -:i - -.
. I ' ~I~ - I: - -
I! .. '. ~ ..... '.> f."'.' '.. I ,- - -
, ' . '" t. M." ......: @ i
I I I j't; t i~'~ ~~ g~'H ~~' ' ~ Zs! ~ ~ - .
,I :-: ~. 7~ l~" ~~ \1; ~~ +--'1
! : __ :': Xi _' ~ IJ ~l; : -
i "...:..,,, ::::::'.)>' f ~~"::- , : '+ 3:~! t
: :-:-:', ..... .',.... , """ . i ~
I i :--::: ,s;:,: Iv ~ ..... N./ "'... ...'
I I ~ I I: I ---.-.,U-L---.----- - ~\ \ .
~ ~ ~ ~~~ ;.. _ _ _ '< \ " - - -G9L-lER- --AVE -
I I I ~ Ij. .., . " \ '. .
& '.. . . ~ > \ \
~ \ " \ \
# ' \ \
@l @l @i @l @l @l @ @J ~~ \ \ -
,i III! i ! II ,\,', ~~,F -- -- -- --------------~--- .
a i I i ~ /
I I ! Ii I "flr, ~[11r(/ ~I ~
! I ! 'lj~
UI "". nnn I ~~~ ~ ~ U~~ 2!:~ !~~~ ~~U !i~f!; ~~ijl F!II~ II! ~ & " r .
I'. . ......... ! ~kl'~ IIIU;I'I,I ~ !!ilii i iii ~ ~ Iii! iii' l!ill!i! !i!lI I!l' ill!i J II n II i!ll! 11--
. ; ,ll i II' I' . nI " 1, ,lIE! Ilil' ,....< .". .,1< 'I . 10 1 j ! B 'I ~-<
:\ ~ ~~I~!II'~' Z i ~ i 1i,I :il! I' '" ," "l:'s'l !. I' . 'I j' i z"
" m 1111111.1 i ~ l · I.p ; I'!,I II Iii' Q ,
tZ 6l<~'"' I~I ~~~ ~ ~ ~R~
I~IP!! I Iii i"' ill
sl Ji I, i ' ! ~ r; i2!p!
IS1*1 !Ill ... . "'.! :11
i ~ !:Il!coll! ~ ~~.~ 1lI1~
~ g I . ~~~ ~ ; ~~.t; ~ ~
co!;!;!; n~!" ..
; iE ,I I I rrr~ r '~' . _ ;;,; h!
I~i~ r I-.J.=. ".
..........,!lITE PLAN &. --) ,___ tI1~w- ill I I
~AVE.COWEIIAVE rk3 .
~~_ I~'l
~,
J1tD
--~ ~
~
/"'"
,.-...
6
~i
'V
~~
~z
..
J>
I\)
o
I
Sf
it
,.
.
0----
iel
~
~
~
~
Ii
FLOOR PLAN
, I,
IX,:
,-~
v'
,,'
,,1
,-~
v'
,,'
I "
,-~
v'
,,'
I ,
,
:0 :
,
-., L___J
-..
,
I
,
<$>
.....
.
~
f---
---
I21~SJ
r r-, /1
'-]- --rl-r n -f="=f=T,7
, ===+=1=+===+--- ·
L --_l.-f-l_--.l---i";;..Jj.~
I
i]:::t,::t:::t:::fl
~ n_.LT-LnL_-L
,
lu---rj--r--rU[,
===+ ,==+===+=== :
---.Ll-_.L_-_.L--- ~
i]:::rt::t:::t:::rl
L- ___.1 _1.___1.___1....1
,
f~==~~J~~~~=~IJ
I: :r ~:x:_ :L-L
,
I
--~---~_l
I
I
~
~
.....
~IJI 7-a.EVEN,1NC.
271t N. HASKElL
CITYPlACE CENIBl EAST
IlAIJAS, 1)( 7li2OO
21....U7ll1
1_COUEIIAYE.
camw. AYE. a COWEll AYE.
UKE EUIlNOIIE. CA.1l253O
~
'0
.ocT"'
Z~
:;:
'lJJ
II !:= i LU
ifn II o:t 9
· :lII 01-""
~SI. fl ffi I Q;
I.' .0
z~
~
I
!
0----
:1
! I DDD'nrl1
--1----- O=DDDD 01 I I I I
I B !: BOD ~IR
i DDDDDD, D 0,
1 0 ,D
! B :
,-1 0
Ir1 I
L:4 Do
i 0 ~I!
I 0 !
0----
::II
~~
~~
i~
)> I ~ fi
N I~ 8
~
,_ COUER AYE.
CENTRAL AVE.. COWER AYE.
LMlE ELSIIIOIE, CA._
ROOF PLAN
. .--,
,
o
~I~
I
I
I
i
i
r=ll
,-"
,-,
,
,
,
,
~~ I
. ,
i
~
.....,
------0
I
I
,
------------j------~ -
I
!
o
-iii 7-El.S1EN,INC.
2n1l1.l_B.L It.
CIIYPLACE CENJEIl EAST
~-:x-~ Q~I. f
n~~
, I
I
~
I
"........
G
~I~
~~1;~\&~,
:u :B
is 0
:J: !i
-I
,m m
r-
I~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~
-I
::f ow t! 0
0 z
z
11 II
I\)
U ~ i>
! I
.
Ita t z
i ; i
~ I
oc ~
I i
~
~
w
b
,
e I'
EXTERIOR ELEVATlONS
il~l~ J~ ~ ~i~
'l f 1 l ~
~1l~1l"~UO" OiiJ3
o
0'
e~ ~Il!!l!!l!l!l! tnl
iflfi;.,!!11 g.i
~~~~~i~l~ ~~
~~~~~I~I~ ~I
~ ~ ail ~ e,
~ 2 II
ji"
3
fa
"Ii iJ i! i!
~~~~;~"I
~ ~M" i~
;11 i;
7 -ELEVEN
CEIlTIW. "'IE.. COIJJm "'IE.
LAKE ELSIHOIlE, CA
'-
a "
iiC
!!&. .
e
::1
!!.
o
o
:7
l.
c
..
3
J~
. t: w
lij II <9
I = 0 a:
1i1'11 ~
z '<
.... :u
rn
:!I - - ---G ~
rn rn
I~ ~
::! ::!
0 0
z z
~ I H
Ii
I\)
.. - i II II 9 II II ~ D II 11
~~ ~
~I !
~ . elllr1lrl!IIr
~i it z I~ !1!I~il
I ~ i
~ I ~~ i~1 ~~I
" & ~ ~ l i ~ B
~ Ii
i i
~
~ ~
~I' ",;;
I I
I
I
I
f ; ~
I I !
I I I
I I I
I I
)>
w
.
...&.
"
~ !I'
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
'-'"
~ f ; f ; ;
! I I I I i
I I I I
I I I
I I I
I
I
-~
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
OJ
11
il
"-'
n -----0
o oJ OJ
o
0'
~ ~
S I
&.
~I
. .
~ ;
ii'
3
.
a '"
3 OJ ill if il
~~II;R'"I
~ ~~i I~
I I ! ;
7 -ELEVEN
CENTRAL AVL a COWEll AVE.
UlICE a..-. CA
H:\2005 .loIls\7 eIeven\l.ake EIsInore\AROi\PUMP BJ:VATIONS, 1D-13-OS.lMg. 4/7/2006 1:50:32 PM,
,kIeach , I , , , I I
JiI"""
~
~
=
~
~
..
~
/'"".
t
. ,
, \
~ ::;! i
:u
tn m - I I
is z ~
m g
S m I I
I ~ I I
!f !f
(5 , , (5 ~ , \
g '0
Z i Z Coo. h
i:
U U
I\;)
~i ~ I II !l II \I 11 il 0 .. t> j iI l iI a .. s::: ~B~~~B~I!.I~ ~BEI"
i . .
~ . .. .. . . .. .. 0' ,~ jl I ~I ~I ~ I i'l!;Q;
.. Iliftil
Ii I I II II II I II II tn i ;1 If i ! I~ lli~!Ui ~
"Ii t ;;r:: ; I , I II I g. g> iJ ~I
; i a i ~ I Ii! I ~ iRI ii ~I ill Iblil
ti :: ::r . I'
~ a ~ Ui I ~ 8- i I 'II I iri'; ~
c:
Oil a ~ l i I ~ ::r ii' ! < I ~! I I; I
. i
i j i ~ I
i! ~ I a IIi : H ; - u.
'II ~ i , I i I 0
f ~ I ~. "9
~ iii' I !
3 r I 0
. ~ z
:e
w
~ E~' 7 -ELEVEN t-w
. :;C~
0 Ii
Og.;
Z
EXTERIOR ELEVAllONS CENIIW. AYE.. COlLER AVE. W
UUCE -.-. CA ~
:t
~I~
......,
---6
---0
"
1-----
Ii
I!
II
Ii ~___
lit
[i
!i
II
il :/~5J
Ii
(I
li
Ji.
Ii ~
ii
li"
I
t-
o
-- - -----e
~
,
,
, ......,
-----G I
D ,
l I
I
I
--0 I
!---0
I
I i I
, III I
I C ,
I I r= ,
0 I
z
~ ~ Ii)
'" , , ,
:> m i'
~ 14 "',
i I~ 1
i5 .~ ~
z
II
j".
I
I
III I
C , I
r=
0 I
z 4
Ii)
'" $
m
~ ...
i5
z
U
N
)>
m
(:)
~~OO@~@OO@OO@~B~0~B~~~~8B~
CD .
~ i i ~I I i ~ ~ III ! IUI; ~ i ~ i ~ I ; i _
Ii ~ t II ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !ii' !ill; . ~ ~ iii - ~ u r"
i !i i . . Ii iii iii 1I I ;II;,,~ ~~ II i ~ ~ ~ - ~ .
II ~ ; ; g i i ! i ~I~~ ,- I : j ! ~ I
i!~~i~~1 ~:!~ ~-119 ~
~ II i lil;1 -I I
~ I m= al
i ~ ~
I I
7 -ELEVEN
BUILDING SECTIONS
CENTRAL AVE." COLl.ERAYE.
LAIlE ELSIHOAE. CA
@
~~~~
~~i~
~~~m
~,..~~
00_;0
~i~~
~~5~
~~~.""t
d~S~
m~~E
~~;uf
~~~12
OC::tO
~~i~
l: Vill:
~ w
~ 0
~~
~.
r--
~
" "
~
I
~
~
==:J ---...
~O ~ IB
d
J .0 '} J
. ... 8
m~~~~
:~;~~ ~ ~
::iI'llCl~:1~
~~~~~~~
~~ril~~~5l
Q~oo~~~
O~~!~~~
p~z'i'H~
::~~ ~ ~ ~
~~'i1B~
::tI-tI~....
~~o ~ ~ "'-e>'
~~~ ~ ~
~~~d
~ o~ ~
~ ~~ ~
!f j~ j
~ ~ ~ ~
i .~~ ~
~ ~~ ~
.~ ~$ ~
~ ~~ ~
~ ~ ~
,,~
~Q
~.
!
~
~
~
~
m
~~~ ~~.
~~ ~~~
~~g ~~~
~~~ ~
~~ w
"';;10 ~
~6fJ ~:-
0", ~~ ~
rill;;
~~ .~
d ill ~
~ :i!
~
o
...&.
~"g ~
! F . i
-- --~;~~~~~;~~~~~~~
.
o
':5 t
".
~~
7-ELEVEN
! III
::0;; f m
oCJ" ..,
tn~i t fQ
~!,;I ~ !i:
.~;~ i 3:J>
i iiz
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN
o
z
:E
~
~
Z
w
~
~
~
.~
~I
w
~
Q;
F'1lDIIIlE: tt.\~.-\7 01_\1-". e.......\C1....\'-OII--OI\~~'SCOOI....." a.... 15 2WII:LSJpm
~
.........
~ ~ l ~ ~H
~ - ~ ~ s
I~'" p i! ~
I ~ iH
· ~ i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,
1\ ,
1\ j
I Q "
, J I 1
'" I I
\'! I
I
I:
I
I:
I
~ I '~I
0' I
JIll Ii
I/Z:, "', I! I
/1 ',_f
I : II
, II'
)' il!
1/1 I"
J 'i
I 1
lU ~II
} I 1
/ ~
.1,
"
'"
. i;;
?j
U>
. g
,~~o~t1Ht
c.,"." H ~
~I~~i~ ~~
~c~5i~ ~i
~. ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
eeeeeeee01
~~~~~~*~2z
..~".~."~
~~~~~~r~~
;j~~~;~;;:;:::l
~d~H~~~
~~~o.~~.m
~~~~ ;~~
~ ~ g" ~
l
~
,
-rE
~
w.." 7-ELEVEN
NWC CENTRAL AND COLLER
LAKE aSlNOlE, CA
::'k- CONCEPTUAL GRADfiG PLAN
Ii.IIet..t --- r-Ilub,
DRC ~_.~.,.,.,.,.,-","
8IniEASTKAI$U80U1LVNl(I
ANAHEIWHI.1S. C.-. 9211011 (714)~-68<
.....
r--
,,-.
,,-.
I J..
mi!
gg~1 J .
J~g~ f
. L
r-
~
:lIIi
m
m
r-
tn
-
Z
o
::u
m
..
n
~
r-
-
"II
o
Z
):
~
.
m
...
m
<
m
Z
;II
~
;II
..
..
..
~
::l
o
z
~~
~ I
mm
P!r-
im
~<
~m
~Z
~
o
z
):
"""
"""
".--.
- - - - - --- - - - - - --. -- - - - - - -
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
TO:
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE:
JUNE 6, 2006
PREPARED BY:
KEN A. SEUMALO, CITY ENGINEER
PROJECT TITLE:
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY
DETERMINATION FOR PROPOSED CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL
YEARS 2006-2007 THROUGH 2010-2011
~
.l dOJECT REOUEST
In accordance with California Government Code Section 65401, City Staff
requests that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Planning Commission
Resolution finding that the proposed five-year Capital Improvement Program, in
substantially the form attached, conforms to the Lake Elsinore General Plan.
PROJECT LOCATION
The Capital Improvement Program is comprised of many different projects which
will be undertaken throughout the City. The projects are not limited to one
geographical area. Consideration of individual projects will be brought before the
Planning Commission in accordance with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and
state laws, as necessary.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A capital improvement program enables a city to make plans for the installation
aY"efurbishment of public infrastructure and facilities. A. capital improvement
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1
n",...~' ..~
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
JUNE 6, 2006
PAGE 3 of3
PR.OJEcr TITLE: GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY DETER.MlNATION
FOR PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2006-2007
THROUGH 2010-2011
~
the community.
4. The proposed roadway improvements are consistent with the Circulation
Element because they contribute to a balanced circulation system that
supports the travel demands of the land USes by increasing capacity,
streamlining the flow of traffic through signalization, and improving travel
quality through installation of asphalt overlay.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission:
I. !Adopt R.esolution No. _ finding that the Capita! Improvement Program
confoFs to the Lake Elsinore General Plan. '-'
2. ~.rect staff to forward a copy of this report and the Planning Commission
Resol tion No. to the City Council as required by Section 65401 of the
Gove ent Code.
PREPARED BY:
J/-- a J~
Ken A. Seumalo,
City Engineer
APPROVED BY:
----t:: Q ,
Rolfe Preisendanz,
Community Development Director
~~
ATTACHMENTS:
2006-20 II Capital Improvement Program
~
AGENDAITEMl
PAGE4-0F--!.$'7
RESOLUTION NO. 2006- 55
,..--...
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT
THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONFORMS TO
THE LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore ("City") has
directed Staff to assemble a five year program of capital improvement projects to be
used as a guideline for construction of City facilities; and
WHEREAS, this program of projects is collectively called the Capital
Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the list of construction projects and improvements either
enhances existing facilities or provides for new facilities in accordance with the
guidelines and requirements contained in the Lake Elsinore General Plan; and
WHEREAS, Staff has reviewed all projects both funded and unfunded and
finds them to be consistent with the guidelines set forth in the Lake Elsinore General
Plan; and
r-
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 6540 ~ the
Planning Commission, as a recommeJ).ding body, must make a fmding that
proposed capital projects conform with the Lake Elsinore General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission shall submit a report to the City
Council regarding the capital projects conformity with the general plan in
accordance with California Government Code Section 65401; and
WHEREAS, notice of the public meeting on this matter has been given, and
the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and other interested parties on June 6, 2006.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the capital
improvement projects and has determined that the Capital Improvement Program
conforms to the Lake Elsinore General Plan based upon the following findings:
~
ACENDA 'TEM NO.
PAOE ~
l
OF \ '& 7 __
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE 2 OF 3
~
1. When drafting the Capital Improvement Program, Staff consulted the Parks
and Recreation, Land Use, and Circulation Elements to ensure that the
proposed capital improvement projects were consistent with the policies and
restrictions pronounced therein.
2. The Capital Improvement Program includes various projects which will add
park space within the City's jurisdiction thereby enhancing quality of life in
an urban community through the creation and preservation of new parkland in
accordance with the Parks and Recreation Element of the Lake Elsinore
General Plan. In addition, the Capital Improvement Program facilitates
upgrades and improvements to existing parks and related amenities.
3. One of the stated purposes of the land use element is to enhance the quality of
'life for the residents of Lake Elsinore. The element encourages future
urbanization while preserving the environmental characteristics of the City.
The capital improvement projects integrate and reflect these objectives as
demonstrated by the Palm Street Preservation Project, preserving historic
street lights and incorporating them into the streetscape,and fIre station and
community center construction These facilities enhance the desirability of
the community.
"""
4. The proposed roadway improvements are consistent with the Grculation
Element because they contribute to a balanced circulation system that
supports the travel demands of the land uses by inc.easing capacity,
streamlining the flow of traffIc through signalization, and improving travel
quality through installation of asphalt overlay.
SECTION 2. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
"""
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE 4.
7
OF , ~1 t
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006~
~ PAGE30F3
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _day of
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
/"'"
Rolfe Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
r-
, 2006, by
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
ACENDA ITEM NO. 1
PACE S OF~
o
~
OP".1...
, .' ::~W" .', ..~;:. ":':i'.~1f:'~~;:(~':"i('::'::' " ,
~:
"""
;~;-<,:t;.
';),'c',',:;'>-
:;;~.+:.~
t.:" ',;--
......"
1
ACENDA \TEM NO._ ~
PACE_ b OF_ \
~
Capital Improvement Program
Contents
Summary of AVclilaole Funding 2006 to 2011
Funding Source Summary: 200612007, '07f08, '08f09, '09f10' '10/11'
lake and Aquatic Resources Projects:
Boat launch Improvements
Diffused Aeration System
Shoreline Safety Plan
Park and Recreation Capital Projects:
/"""
City Park Restroom & Concession Construction Project
888-Park
Lincoln Street Park
City Park. Play Equipment Replacement
Senior Center Expansion
lake Community Center - lobby Expansion
Senior Center Expansion
Street Maintenance Capital Projects:
Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Repair for Spring. Street
Annual CurD, Gutter and Sidewalk Repair.Program
Pavement Management Program
Annual Traffic Striping Maintenance
Casino Drive Bridge Seismic Retrofit
Relocate Power Poles Near Auto Center Drive/Franklin Avenue
Railroad Canyon Road Slope Repair ,
lakeshore Drive Historic Street Light Renovation
Traffic Capital Projects
Interchange Enhancement Grand Avenue/Ortega Highway
Railroad Canyon Road/l-15 Project Study
SR-74/1-15 Interchange Interim Improvements
Railroad Canyon Rd/l-15 Interchange Interim
SR-7411-15 Project Report
Railroad Canyon Hoad/l-15 Interchange (TUMF)
SR-7411-15 Interchange (TUMF)
""..-
1
2
7
8
10
12
14
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
47
49
51
53
55
57
59
I
ACENDA ITEM NO.
PACE 1
l
OF \ ~ fl
'-
General City CapitalProiects:
Library Books Purchase and Building Fund Contribution
Storage AreclNetwork Upgrade (SANS)
General...Plarl'Update
Palm Tree PreservatiQn Program
1 GB Network Switch Upgrade
Click2Gov Server Purchase
Document Management System (OMS) Pilot
Enterprise Network Printer Replacements
IT Room Infrastructure Renovation
Community Dialing Information System (IVR)
HTElGIS Integration (aka Looking Glass™)
Branding Project
Rosetta Canyon Fire Station & Community Center
Civic Center Feasibility Study
DrainaQe Improvements:
Arroyo Del Torro Drainage Improvement
Unfunded Projects:
Lake:
Beach Rehabilitation
Lake MasterPlan
Back Basin Repair
Back Basin Levee Slope Repair
Dredge Inlet Channel
Lake Department Headquarters and Maint. Yard
Parks:
City Park Expansion
Outlet Channel Trail- Phase I
Community Center Improvements
Lake Point Park Jetty Wall
Lake Point Park Playground Equipment Replacement
Machado Park Restroom Replacement
Lake Point Park Parking Lot Paving
CollierAvenue Median Landscaping
Swick-Matich Park Improvements
CityYard Facility Expansion
II
61
62 ......,
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
87A
88
89
91
92 '.....,
94
96
98
100
102
104
105
107
109
111
113
115
117
119
121
123
.....,
l
OF \ ~ '\
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE ~
.r'
Streets:
Lakeshore Drive Widening .& Street Lighting
Dexter Avenue Road Repair
Camino Del NorteRoadway Connection
Graham Avenue Reconstruction
Ellis Street Reconstruction
Nichols Road . Improvements
Reid Street Improvements
Fraser Drive Reconstruction
Gunder Avenue Roadway Construction
Gunnerson Street Roadway Reconstruction
Oakview Way/Beechwood Lane Improvements
Larson Road Overlay
Franklin Street . Overlay
Grand Avenue Overlay
Lakeshore Drive Overlay
T raffle:
,,-...
Main St.lLakeshore Dr. Signal Installation
Terra Cotta Road Closure
Main St.lGraham Avenue Signal Installation
Grand Ave.lMacy St. Signal Installation
Grand Ave.lRiverside Dr. Signal Installation
Summerhill Dr.lLa Strada Signal Installation
Spring St.lGraham Ave. Signal Installation
DrainaQe Improvement
Mill Street/Avenue 6 Drainage Improvements
Library Street Drainage Improvement
---
III
ACENDA ITEM NO.
PACE_ c\..
125
126
128
130
132
134
136
138
140
142
144
146
148
150
152
154
156
157
159
161
163
165
167
169
171
172
174
1_
OF \ ~ '{
--
III 0
! ii
::s m
n )(
. l'
....
~
..
I\>
'"
~
N
'"
....
"
'"
....
~ :::j
.... '" '"
~ (:) ..
'" <> <>
'" <> <>
...
"
'"
'"
::
u.
.
"
'"
...
'"
'"
'"
...
-...
...
'"
I\>
:..
'"
....
u.
'"
....
o
<>
"0
<>
<>
~
u.
~
~
'"
'"
I\>
<>
'"
'"
....
'"
'"
....
I\>
-...
'"
....
<iO 00
I\> I\>
<> <>
a 0
<> <>
S <>
~
-...
00
I\>
I\> '"
!>> -~
'" '"
... ...
:...., 0
.... ....
'" '"
~ -
co co
.
- -
- -
-
w
'"
....
"0
<>
<>
~
N
'"
'"
"0
<>
<>
'"
I\>
<>
"0
<>
<>
<>
<>
"0
<>
<>
...
<>
"0
<>
<>
'"
'"
"0
00
'"
"0
....
'"
'"
00
N
...
'"
-...
....
'"
-
co
.
-
..
;Q
.
<
.
::s
11:
.
~
"0
'"
'"
"0
<>
<>
~
N
'"
...
"0
<>
<>
~
"0
<>
<>
"0
<>
<>
00
'"
<>
"0
<>
<>
'"
<>
<>
"0
<>
<>
..
<>
<>
"0
<>
<>
'"
'"
"0
<>
<>
'"
'"
"0
00
'"
"0
....
'"
'"
<>
"0
<>
<>
<> 0
... '"
.
- ..
co 0
III 0
;. =v
::s m
n )(
. l'
g
'"
..
I\>
'"
~
N
'"
'"
"
'"
....
:::4
.... '"
~ a
'" 0
00 0
...
-....
'"
'"
..
<>
u.
.
"
'"
...
.'"
~
'"
....
-...
...
'"
..
'"
....
....
u.
'"
....
o
<>
"0
<>
o
~
.....
<>
.'"
..
'"
'"
I\>
o
'"
'"
....
'"
'"
N
I\>
-...
'"
....
'"
...
-...
00
N
I\>
'" '" ....
b :.., (0
(.0) " A
'" I\> 00
W (:) :,..
.... 0 <>
'" <> <>
'"
....
....
"0
o
<>
N
<>
"0
o
o
'"
"0
o
o
"0
<>
<>
<>
co
.
-
o
;Q
.
<
.
::s
11:
.
'"
....
'"
"0
<>
<>
..
:..
~
"0
<>
<>
:::4
'"
.....
<>
<>
~
"0
o
<>
"0
<>
<>
00
'"
<>
"0
<>
<>
'"
<>
<>
"0
<>
<>
..
o
o
"0
<>
o
-
'"
'"
"0
o
<>
'"
"0
<>
<>
"0
o
<>
'"
<>
"0
<>
<>
o co
00 00
. .
o co
... ...
III 0
!- :v
::s m
n )(
. l'
'"
t
.....
I\>
'"
..
'"
"
'"
....
'"
00
'"
00
...
"
'"
'"
CD
U.
.
"
'"
...
....
N
00
...
-...
...
'"
..
.....
'"
....
u.
'"
....
..
N
'" ...
.0 <>
.. "0
'" <>
'" 0
N
g
'"
....
'"
N
....
I\>
-...
'"
....
~
-...
00
N
I\>
o
00
'"
N
'"
....
'"
N
....
....
"0
<>
<>
~
N
'"
'"
"0
<>
o
.. ..
.... ....
'" '"
a :,..
<> <>
<> 0
N
o
"0
<>
o
<>
o
"0
o
o
'"
"0
o
o
"0
<>
<>
...
00
'"
'"
"0
<>
<>
'"
N
'"
00
-...
<>
<>
o
00
co
...
;Q
.
<
.
::s
11:
.
co
~
"0
<>
<>
..
w
'"
'"
"0
<>
<>
N
"0
<>
o
"0
o
<>
00
'"
o
"0
<>
o
'"
o
o
"0
<>
<>
o
o
"0
<>
o
..
'"
0>
"0
<>
<>
'"
"0
<>
<>
"0
<>
<>
..
o
<>
"0
<>
o
<>
....
o
00
III
..
iii'
::s
n
.
...
N
'"
N
"
'"
....
....
'" '"
-. b
'" 0
00 <>
...
-....
'"
'"
....
u.
.
-....
'"
...
'"
.....
~
~
'"
~
....
u.
'"
....
..
:..
'"
~
..
'"
'"
N
o
'"
'"
....
'"
....
I\>
-...
'"
....
'"
...
-...
00
I\>
'"
-...
'"
'"
u.
....
'"
o
....
o
00
o
'i
m
)(
l'
CD
~
"0
<>
<>
..
N
'"
'"
"0
<>
<>
N
<>
"0
o
<>
N
<>
<>
"0
<>
o
'"
<>
"0
<>
<>
....
00
<>
...
u.
<>
<>
<>
~
'"
u.
<>
<>
o
....
o
00
;Q
.
<
.
::s
11:
.
00
'"
'"
"0
<>
<>
..
N
00
00
"0
<>
<>
:::4
'"
-...
<>
<>
N
N
<>
<>
"0
<>
<>
0>
'"
<>
"0
<>
<>
00
<>
<>
"0
<>
<>
N
<>
<>
"0
<>
<>
..
'"
'"
"0
<>
<>
....
00
~
u.
<>
<>
~
'"
o
"0
<>
o
...
-...
'"
N
'"
<>
<>
o
...
co
....
III
..
ii
::s
n
.
'"
N
.....
N
'"
t:>
N
N
'"
~
'"
<>
'" <>
"0 "0
'" 0
00 <>
...
-....
'"
'"
'"
w
.
-....
~
'"
u.
00
...
-...
...
co
c;;
....
en
'"
....
-
"0
'"
.00
'"
'"
N
<>
'"
'"
....
'"
I\>
" '"
N '" N
I\> <> <>
..... 0 b
'" 0 <>
.... <> <>
~
-...
00
N
N
W
00
.0
:::4
'"
o
en
o
....
o
'i
m
)(
l'
I\>
N
'"
co
"0
c>>
..
"0
I\>
....
"0
o
o
..
-....
'"
....
"0
<>
<>
co co
00 '"
b '0
o <>
<> <>
::
"0
o
<>
~
u.
'"
....
"0
<>
<>
'"
'"
"0
<>
<>
N
U.
~
N
<>
<>
'"
<>
<>
"0
<>
<>
00
o
"0
<>
o
..
<>
W
N
co
N
~
N
'"
"0
<>
<>
..
o
'"
"0
<>
<>
N
'"
'"
w
~
I\>
'"
00
N
00
00
'"
...
I\>
<>
u.
co
'"
-."
00
<>
o
...
o
....
;Q
.
<
.
::s
11:
.
N
N
'"
co
~
'"
00
I\>
<>
"0
<>
<>
..
N
.
"0
<>
o
..
....
'"
.....
o
<>
N
N
o
o
"0
<>
<>
..
-."
o
o
"0
o
<>
00
<>
<>
"0
<>
<>
'"
o
o
"0
o
o
..
'"
'"
"0
<>
o
..
o
W
I\>
co
N
'"
...
N
'"
"0
<>
<>
N
'"
'"
w
'"
...
"V
-<
o
..
~
6
~
"
ii
n
!!.
...
Q
"
N
'"
co
.....
N
'"
Q
..
..
-f
..
)(
'"
'"
o
-....
'"
....
3:
-
..
..
11:
~
)>
..
'"
<>
-...
'"
00
en-f
. ;: ....
..........
.:cii'en
I~
..
'"
"
'"
'"
en
..
3
l'
...
-."
~
"
'"
...
~
:n
...
"0
...
'"
-."
...
CD
o
il
5"
..
Co
~
"
'"
....
"V
..
;l-
..
o
o
III
Q
'"
'"
J'>
'"
'"
,..
;;:
il
~
N
o
'"
'"
....
'"
"V 3:
~n
!" 0
en
"Q
; .
Q. ?
I\>
-...
'"
I\>
-...
CD
....
1lI;Q
- ;Q
::s 0 N
2~ :
a g
c>>
....
-."
00
I\>
3"
'tJ ..
~ g ~
;:~
-
If ~ ~
"V
11:
!T
3
l'
flo
::s -
~~
'"
<0
<>
J'>
;:...a,
'""
6
~
PAGE
I\>
o
en
~
-
N
~
-
en
o
...,
~
en
o
en
..
o
o
..
-
o
..
..
...,
..
'"
o
...,
~
10M NI
o
,,:0
~(I)
!!.c
0(3
. 3
.. III
iI .;!,
...,
g2-
!!!)>
~<
~ !.
s-ii"
...,2:
011I
;;"11
NC
0=
-Q.
- -.
=
11:I
Jf)
~
'-'
~
OF
1
\~L
/
(\
(\
n
Tn a a (;) '" Q o 0 Inn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~H ~H ~ ~ ) inn c ~ ~
nn~ i ~ 88~q a ~ ~ n~ ni h 6
. N
~ ~ . p "m n g! P i ~ f ~ " Ii' HI pi . ~ n ~ ~ P J I
a · , f ·
~ ' ~ 0 -0 ~ ~ ! r I i f ~ $ . ~ i r:i'j : f. f :
J' II q .ni~i ~ f n
~ ~ ~ . r[Jq . :; . ~h m s ~ f ~ ~
0 n~
Q I ~ f ~ . I d r ..! ~ J ~ ! pi. ~ ~
~ " J . I ~
i I ! i i . : pp L~ d~ I w ~ .
, ~
~ J ~ c . . ~ "i i ~
I ! " ~ lu !
0 f'
. ~ f
g i3 ~ ... ;!:; ... ... ; !lI l ~ . i ~ f
t f; ~ .... .
. N N ih a ~
~ . ~ ... t t l!'l l'j N '" ~ ~ ~ ! E ~ ~ s i I Ii ~ 3 8 ~ 8 ~ I 8 8 iii iii
. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ nn~ . no ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ nn~ nnl
N
I 8 . . ~ ~ N Ii 8 Ii ~ o .
c . . 8
. ~ ~nn ~ ~ ~ n ~
.
~ ~ , ~ Ii r ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;
. Ii . . ~ . .
~ . · a ·
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . -
iii 8 ~~ . ~
~ ~ a =I
I I F .
~ ~ . .
.
~ ~ ~ ~
~ . . e D
.... ~ g:
~ ~ ~ ~
. . q
~ ~
~ " U . n
~ ~ ~
I ~ B .
~ ! .
. . c ~
~ ~
i Ii ~ ~ iii ~ 8 8 :; ~ i J il
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H ~
0 i tt ~ i HI . ~ tt
0 ~ S ~ ~ .
. ~ ~ f I 0 Ii ! f il
" i
~ n h
.
8 ~ 8 i I~ e
~ ~ ~ ~ .
~ i .
~ ~ ~ ~ .
iii Ii i J f ·
~ ~ ~ f .
~
. - . \'
\; ~ \; .
9
~
~
a
~
1
OF ''3 (
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE \\
C> C>
m m
z z
g g
m ~
m (j) ~ ~ ~ ~
z ~ "T'I "T'I ::tJ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
i ~ f ~ J ~ ~ ~ J
~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ I~ ~ ~
~~. ~ ~ I~ ch ~ ~ ~
~ n ~ ; ~ ~ ::tJ ~ 00
al a<8",~~~
~g~~~:~
g ~ C ::::J ... m 3:
:. j;Y ~ ~ ~ 3 !!!
~ :; Is; CD n i
~3:~~i~
3 I." I. ~ S
o r'U f! - "l)
~ ~ I~ k8
a 3: m
~ 3
'" '"
:;j ;;j
~ ~
-0 >
~ S
3 ~
. 0
a c
;: a.
Li ~
~ ~
a ~
~ f
(; ~
3 ~
'il ,
;: -0
fJ!~
a
3
..
<>
~
;g >;: ~ "i1 :J
~~tJ~-o
8 0 8 ~
..., 8 I'.)
~ ~ If ~
:;, 0 !!. ::::J
~ i. r- 14
o :; ~ 1f
CIl III :::J 6"
~ g> 9- (j)
... it - 01
ll' ~ ~ ~
fa -0 a ~
Ig: Dr ai
5 :J ~
~ ~
or
.. N 0
~ ~ =1
a ~V
i ~ "
.. m
~ p!
.. '"
a z
~ g
Ii m
"
c
,
~
!!I
()
'ij
CD
"
~
!Po
;:
.
a:
o
s
~ ~ ~
~ ..
'" ;;;
'" ..
..
N
'"
"
..
8 ~ ~ m t or
8 8 g 8 g ~
z
o
..
<0
'"
~ :j
<> '"
g g
~ N C7l
.. <> <>
888
~ ~ ~ 8 8
88888
::;!
" '!!
- <>
" <>
gJ
<>
l;: ~ II
~ = ~
<0
~
~
'" "
8 8
N
<>
I 8
8
;:
.. : '!!
o . ~
8 ,.
N
'"
'"
8
lS 8 ~
888
"
..
.... !!. !
~ ~ ~
-
"
'"
8
r
r '!!
;: '"
o <>
::! R
" ..
;: ~
, -
N
<>
8
N
<>
<>
g
g !
ID '"
" <>
c ~
I -
<
'"
<>
g
<>
2l
8
..
..
n
f ~
..
..
~ ~ g
888
"
<>
~
8
gj gj
g 8
c! c!
;: ;:
" "
<0
;i
8
..
s.
(
c " C>
~ !!: iiJ
~ ~ a
[ ~ ~
~O ~N[ A 111, aN;
~
PAOE \ ~
"
~
"
*
."
C
~
~ '!!
E 0
II '"
~-
'"
I I
I
OF \1\
"'"
.... .... Gl Gl Gl (J) (J) (J) r g ~
'" '" m m m .... .... .... '"
" " z z z '" '" '" m "
<> 6 <> 6 6 6 <> <> 6 " 6
<> ~ <> <> <> <> <> <> <> ~
ii ii g ~ <> g <> <>
'" .... N N
c} (J) '" OJ ." ~ )> ." )> OJ .... " N 0
'" !!! iil " " " " 0 iil ~ <> ~
3" " " ~ " !!! <>
E1: .... a " " " " " ~
0. " It
~ " 5 .... !!!. !!!. ~ !!!. r ~ 0
'" 0. n! " <>
0 '" r .... a () " <> on
() ." .. 6' iil " " ;; :I .. ~
0 ~ '< ~ ." ~ 3l ;:: a- S l:l: 0
'" " Gl
'" n! " " ~ .. It .. '"
'" ~ " Gl ." m
"5 '" ~ " ~ " "
0 0 .. " .. '"
0 <; < 0 '" ~ i!!. !!!. m
<l 0 -0 .. i3 r
<D @ !!!. "" 5 3 ~ " (/)
=r 0 ." '" .. .. on ~ z
Q " - 3 "
<!l - " " ;:: a (J) .. " 0
"1J '" ." <l " ." 1i " 0. .. '"
.. ~ =r 5 ~ i or liT
III -::j "5 " m
c <; " <;
~ c g. iil .. " iil >f
;:: 3 .. " 3
"
m. .:!) " OJ !il - '"
g 0: ." ~
'" ~ ;:: "
-::j on 2! '<
c " l
" iil
;:: 0. 3
.:!)
... ... ... ... ... Z
N t5 N <> N 0
'" ~ w
<> '" CD .... ..
'" ~ - ~ ~
N <> <> ;:; <> ;:; <> (D c}
<> <> l1l N ... <> <> 8
'" <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> it
<> <> <> <> <> <> <> 8 8 <> 8
<> 8 <> <> <> 8 <> <>
<> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
'" '" Q :!
'" '"
<> 8 - g
<> on
<>
gj Ii: G\
N .. -
N .... <> '" .. ..
<> <> <> 8 oJ ..
<> <> <> " 0
<> <> <>
~ ~ ;::
N <>
'" '" <> CD (D .. ..
w w <> <> <> .. ~
.. ~
<> <> <> <> 8 N
<> <> <> <> )>
<> <> <> <>
....
~ ~ !!. ..
.... ~ ~
'" (/) ~
<> 8 ~ '"
<>
<> <>
r
r :!
;: ...
0 <>
N N " ..
<> <> .. N
<> <> a- N
<> <> ~
<> <>
0 !
0
OJ '"
Q <>
... ... r ~
<> <> 6'
<> <> iil ~
<> <> '!
<> <>
..
"
n ..
w ~ ~ ~ Q ~
<> <> <> <> .. <>
<> <> <> <> ~ '"
<> <> <> <> ."
<> <> <> <> .2
<> <> <> <>
<> <> <> <>
.... .... Gl "
c c iil "
;:: ;:: a ~
on on 0. ..
" 3 ~
" '" <>
0. 0 '"
0 ..
.. , ~
g
PACE '\:, OF \81
(\
(\
(\
'"
;;l .... G'l G'l (J) (J) (J) .... ~
" m m ;l .... .... ~
.. b z z " " ~
I> I> :': g 0 I> 0 6
0 0 R 0 0 if
;;; 0; :1 0 0 2
... ..
d (J) " " ~ ~ " ~ it 1. ... n
" ... ... . 0 =<
~ if 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
~ c c c iy
.... ... ... 3 ... 0 It
'" . if
@ a. ii C ~ m n
8 - n <T a c <; ::l
CD 0; '< " ~ ;:: a G'l a:
~ ii n . co fl "
m
'" 5" " I (J) ~ G'l ~ 'i m
0 Ii 0 to ~ ~ ~ m m
~ 0 ...
0 9- ~ 0 m i!. !;;
~ ~ "
" .. .. a z
0 " c
;; ~ ~ ~ c ;:: a (J) ~ 0
'2 '" " g. a a. m
. " n "
lD ~ 5" .8 . s- a ! 2! Ii m
c: Ii 0 Ii <0
~ m ~ ~
~ ;:: ~ .. . ~ '" ;::
:.!l ~ " .
to 2 a
~ ~ m
" "0
m " ;:: . 0
~ .. .8 J! ~ .
c 1 -
c ~ ~
;:: a. 3
:.!l
.. .. .. :!: .. z
ill ... ... 0 0
'" 0 ... ~
... 0 <0 .. ..
~ 0; 0; - ~
g 0 0 N .. ~ 0 0 ..
0 0 0 0 0 !r
'" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '"
g 0 0 g 0 0 0 g 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
" !l:
- 0
.. 0
~ '" ..
r:: '" e: ..
... 0 ..
8 0 0 0 oj ..
0 0 0 )( 0
0 0 0
- - if
N 0 !l:
'" '" 0 .. .. .
'" '" 0 0 0 .. -
8 0 0 0 0 ...
0 0 0 0 )> {
0 0 0 0
....
51 ::< ! !l:
'" en -
g 0 ~ '"
0
0 0
r ..
r ~
!l: ...
0 0
.... ..
- ...
.. 0
'"
0 ~
!.
~ ~
N N " ..
0 0 ~ ...
0 0 ...
g g -
n !l:
0
~ '"
0
.. .. c ..
0 0 <T ...
0 g ~ ~
0 .:.!
0 0
;::
...
'" 0; 0; n
0 " !l:
0 0 0 . 0
0 0 0 . '"
0 0 0 ..
0 0 0 s. ( )
g 0 0
0 0
c! .... .. r0-
c c
;:: ;:: .
.. .. a. !l:
-h ;-
'" 0
I AD;: e~ M ~o ~ '"
IDI
1_- \ ~. -,..\, ref
n
~
g
N
':l
o
N
':l
~
o
'ij
!Xl
"
~
ll:
~
m
o
g
m
~
o
8
o
w
!!l
g
(\
~
m
w
o
8
~
m
8
o
~
~
o
o
8
~
o
o
o
o
~
m
m
m
8
(\
Cl)
~~~~~~itJ
~~~~~~..a
~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ t g g g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~
3 ~ a ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ G G ~ ~ ~
~ ~ . : 0 0 000 0 ~ a ~ 3 ~ ~ ~
.~!l~~~\(!~~fl'-l ".0
a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ g
:~~~~&~~~~~G~J:
!l.~~@ia9~9~ ~;~;~~
UII(;)(;)Q.w3::!:fj~~3J(I)oa
-. ::;- ~ a iiI :L !!. !!. - jj -.!l ~ :::::
;::! ... ~::J _~ ::II < ~ :i Ii" !!
~ ~ S ~ ~ ~ !! !! Is!!. ~ :!:
"n !T 0 :u G - t- J:It ::II i5. ;a. ,3:0 '"
~__::J<~l!OQ""8l!.>f":O_ ::J
~ l!O 3 ~ i ~ ~ I ~ ~ :!: i Q
.-. ~ Q, 15': ~ "': g. m 3!' -
~G.I'<.3::7 :y__
3: ~ 3 S ~ d 8
:!l .
Q Q
m m
z z
8 8
j1 ~
it it it it
..... -n "'TI "TI
~ ~ ~ ~
m UI 0 Ul
it it it it
i i 6 i
co ..... g UI
!~
, g
m ~
o ..
1 i
. .
3 "
OJ
r8'
."
"
~
t t t
mom
o m ~
m m
~ ~ 8 8 g g ~ ~ ~ ~
g g g g g g g g g g
g :s ~ :::
g ::]
8 8
o 0
~
o
o
o
o
~
o
g
0; m
8 g
g g
~ ~
'" '"
." ."
~
;:;
m
8 t; ~ ~ 8 m
g ::] g ::] g ::]
~ :::
o 0
8 8
11 fl
~ w ~
g g 8
m
w
g
o
8 g
::] g
~(jENPA Ili MN
...~~ "
~ ~
o ~
~ t
~
o
o
8
::? ~ 0
a ~ ~
:t :: "II
il 0
>
'"
'" :::
;; !;;
~ ~
'"
g m
z
o
..
~ i
o
8
c
3-
a-
8.
Q .
:;; g
g; f :!
o ;;} t-6
g )C 0
o
.,
~ & ~
8 .. N
o
~ ~! ~
m m
o
o
o
r
r !
., w
o 0
; i
~ ~
,. -
~
o
o
o
o
o
.. ..
i I::!
B !
i!l l!l
~
.. ..
~ !t
~
m
m
8
o
'"
~
f ~
m
~
~
."
,
~
[.[ ~
~ m
n
-l
~ ill
'Ill
FIve Year CapItal Improvement Projects Llsbng 2006/2007 through 2010/2011
u
Lake and Aquabc Resource Projects
l/(E-0002 4237 Boat launch Improvments ~~OOO
l/(E-0006 Diffused Aeration ~ystem ~2~OOO
l/(E-DOOS Shoreline Safety Plan I 20~OOO
Estimated Total
Total Lake and Aquatic Resource ProJectsl $11,330,000 I
u
u
~
AClENDA ITEM NO
PAClE-Ll.
1
OF \'9.""
PROJECT AREA
lAke E/sl11ore
.
BOAT LAUNCH IMPROVEMENTS
I
I
CIty Of Lake Elsinore
130 S Mem St
Lake EtslOOfe CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www lake-elsmore org
PROJECT 10 NUMBER LKE-G002
PROJECT NUMBER
o 3SO 700
. . . . . I
1 400 Fe<<
+
-By
...-....
--
--
__GIS
Cllyo#1*EWRDrwc;rs
--
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE n OF \'3'1
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2011 Caprtallmprovement Program
Project DescnptJon
u
ProJect ID No
ProJect Number
ProJect Type
lKE-002
4237
Boat launch Improvements
Description
Rehabllrtate the boat launch at the lake Elsinore Recreation Area
(lERA) Campground per the FeaSibility Report by Noble
Consultants Inc
Location
lERA Campground at 32040 RIVerside Dnve
Actua/to
Funding Source Date 2006/2007 2007/2008 200812009 2009/2010 2010/2011 Total
MISe #105
CA Dept Boabng & $100000 $2 400 000 $500 000 $3 000 000
Waterways
Supplemental Grant
Fundmg Request $3 000 000 $500 000 $3 500'
CA-DBAW #105
Proceeds From $686 000 $500 000 $1186 000
Flnanang #105
Parlts #221 $91 000 $823 000 $914000
Total Project Cost $191 000 $3 223 000 $4186000 $1 000 000 $8 600 000
Actual 06107 07/08 08109 09/10 10111 Total
DesIgn $191 000 $256 000 $447 000
Eny Permit $250 000 $250 000
RNI
Admin $100 000 $87 000 $187000
Construcbon Cost $2617 000 $4 099 000 $300 000 $7016000
Conbngency $700 000 \ $700 000
u
ACENDA ITEM NO~
PACE \ 1> OF \1> 1
('
('
'"
!Iqnq
~.~'nl~
O'lq'ii~
l' ~'.ii
. I I
i~@.., I
g~ : I
~..~
l !.!.8&!~~
'@ PC:I8~1D
@ ~l'IJ@IlI
I c"> ~~ _ ~
--....-
--
~
1\[jIjll\l'IJ@IlI~
r>I\I\IlJ
{
^" \IlI (
City of Lake Elsinore
2006 2011 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
II
I:
'I U
I,
J
,
II
I'
II
I,
I
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
LKE-0006
Diffused Aeration System
Oescnptlon
II
Capital Improvement Project funding allocation to EVMWD to
I
construct LESJWA s designed Diffused Aeration System In the
Lake II
Location
Lake ElSinore
Actual to I
Funding Source Date 200612007 200712008 200812009 200912010 201012011 Total
LESJWA Grant
Funds $1 550 000 ,I $1550 000
EVMWD $325 016 $325016
County $325016 " $325016
City Unallocated , $325016\....t
General Fund $325016 I'
Total Project Cost $2 525 048 $2 525 048
Actual 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 Total
Design
Env Pennl!
RIW
Admin $293 336 $293 336
Construction Cost $2171 712 $2171 712
Contingency $60 000 $60 000
u
ACENDA ITEM NO .-J
PACE ;;:>0 OF~
I I I I' 'I
o 750 1500 3000 Feel
.
+
SHORELINE SAFETY PLAN
Cdy Of lake Elsrnore
1308 Mam81
Lake Elsanore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www Iake-elslnOf8 org
PROJECT 10 NUMBER LKE-0005
PROJECT NUMBER
-...
"'_GIS
--
-.......
--.-...
ClIp of..... EJsh-. GIS
-~
AGENDA ITEM NO \Q 1
PAGE ~, OF 0
CIty of Lake Elsinore
2006-2011 CapItal Improvement Program
Project Descnpbon
()
PrOject ID No LKE-0005
Project Number
Project Type Shoreline Safety Plan
Description Implement recommendations from lake Safety Assessment
location Shoreline Property
Actual 10
Funding Source Date 200612007 200712008 2008/2009 200912010 201012011 Total
General Fund #100 $60 000 $115000 $30 000 $205 000
I
/'
,
Total Project Cost $60000 $115000 $30 000 I $205 00(
-
Actual 06/07 07/08 08/09 0911 0 10111 Total
DeSign $55 000 $55 000
Env Permit I
RIW
Adm.n $5 000 $5 000 $2 000 $12000
Construcllon Cost $100000 $25 000 $125000
Conbngency $10000 $3 000 $13000
()
AOEtJOAITEMNO~
PACE ~~ OF \'%1
(\
(\
(\
Five Year Capital Improvement PrOjects Llstmg 2006/2007 through 2010/2011
Park and Recreation Capital Projects
I Project 10 IproJect No ~ Project Title
IEstlmated Total I
PRK 0001 4236 :::itv Park Restroom/Concession Construcbon 615,000
PRK 0002 888 Park 356 000
PRK 0003 Lmcoln Street Park 566 500
PRK-D004 City Park Play EqUipment Replacement $ 100,000
PRK-0005 Senior Center ExpanSion 190 000
PRK 0006 Lake Community Center Lobby ExpanSion 86 000
PRK-0007 IExpanslon of Senior Center MaIO Bulldlno 364,500
Total Park and Recreation Capital proJectsl $ 2,278,000 I
ACENDAITEM NO J-
PACe ?3 OF \'1\ 7
.
+
City Of Lake Elsinore
1305 MamSt
Lake EIsonoIe CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
wwwlake-elsmore 0I\l
CITY PARK RESTROOM AND CONCESSION CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
PROJECT 10 NUMBER PRK-0001
PROJECT NUMBER
-By
............""
-....
--
-""'-'"
atycl&..- EW-. Gl
---
ACENDA ITeM NO 1
PACe. ~~_ .OF-R-
(\
(\
('
City of Lake Elsinore
2006 2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
PRK-0001
4236
City Park Restroom and Concession Construction Project
Description
Construct a new park restroom building adjacent to the eXisting restaurant
and construct new roof for both buildings The project will require the
removal of a tree In the area of the construction
Location
City Park at the northeast comer of Main Street and Library Street
Actual to
Fundln!! Source Date 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 Total
Grant Fund #105
$294 000 $294 000
Park In-lieu #105 $321 000 $321 000
Total Project Cost $ $ 615 000 $ $- $ $- $615000
Actual 06107 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 Total
DeSIgn $20 000 $20 000
Env PermIt 0 0
RIW 0 0
AdmIn $45 000 $45000
ConstructIon $500 000 $500 500
Contongency $50 000 $50 000
ACENDA ITEM NO 1
PAce ~') OF ,~J
ETIENNE ST
UNCOlN AVE
0-
f/)
w
g
~
L
.
+
888 PARK
City Of lake Elsinore
1308 MaillS'
lake El:snore CA 92530
(951) 674-312'
www lake-etsmore 0'9
PROJECT ID NUMBER PRK-0002
PROJECT NUMBER
-By
......-. GIS
.....,....
--
-.........
aryol"""~
-~
AGENDA ITEM NO
PAGE ~t
1
OF \'b I
(\
o
o
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
PRK 0002
888 Park
DescrIPtion
The City In conjunction with Elsinore Valley MUnicipal Water Dlstnct will
produce plans to develop a park and a water pump station on site
Location
888 Park at Terra Cotta and Lincoln
Actual to
FundIng Source Date 200612007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 Total
EVMWD $356 000 $356 000
Total Project Cost $ $ 356 000 $ $ $ $ $356 000
Actual 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/1 0 10/11 Total
Design $35 000 $35 000
Env Perrmt $5 000 $5 000
RIW 0 0
Admm $15000 $15000
Construclton $266 000 $266 000
Contmgency $35 000 $35 000
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE 1.1
l
OF ,~7
,
I I
- ~~.~
- /
PROJECT AREA --- ( '\
- BlARRRZ ST r ~
I
-' ./
f
- ~.
-
{~ ElnllQtIi~.....
- ''''~'
- I
- ~I )
ETIENNE ST
-
:5 ;/
I t;
l
I f1,
I ~
I
/ "-
UNCOlHAVE ------------ I "l-~ (
~
"Ii; / r & ~
w ;I
g ~~ I'
~ '> '
'-- ~-~ I
CA.IIPHoR~ ~\ "t "1.....t.
~ .}
, , ~ PROJECT AREAT ~ ~~
&
Y / ~ .(f).
I V+C
IRONWooD ST ~.I',.-
~~ "":Y~ "^'
o 60 120 240 Feet
1
. +-
LINCOLN STREET PARK
PROJECT ID NUMBER PRK..ooo3 -By
Cdy Of Lake ElsInore PROJECT NUMBER UJ.EIUIoAoGIS
130 s Matn Sl ....,"""
-.......
lake Elsinore CA 92530 _c-....
(951) 674-312' CllyolLah~c;,s
wwwlake-elsm0r8 0fQ --.....
ACENDA ITEM NO 1
PACE '~rL. Of, \1> 1_._
n
('
n
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Caprtallmprovement Program
Project Descnptlon
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
PRK 0003
Lincoln Street Park
Description
The City In ItS master plan of parks will develop this site for use as a
neighborhood park
LocatIon
Lincoln Street Park at the north east comer of Lincoln Street and Terra Cotta
Actual to
Funding Source Date 200612007 200712008 200812009 200912010 201012011 Total
Parke I P Fee
#221 $566000 $566 000
Tolal Project Cost $ $ 566 000 $ $ $ $ $566 000
Actual 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 Tolal
Design $35 000 $35 000
Env Perrmt $5 000 $5 000
RJW 0 0
Admin $15000 $15000
Construcbon $465 000 $465 000
Conbngency $46 500 $46 500
AGENDA ITEM NO I L
PAGE ').~ OF ~\
.
+
City Of Lake Elsinore
130 S Main Sl
Lake Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
wwwlake-elsmoreDlg
CITY PARK PLAY EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
PROJECT 10 NUMBER PRK-0004
PROJECT NUMBER
-....
__GIS
--
--
_"-GIS
~oIl.Iitea.l.-Gl$
--.
ACENDA ITEM rID
PACE ~
I
OF \ 'b 7
()
('\
("
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project DescnptJon
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
PRK - 0004
City Park Play Equipment Replacement
Oescnptlon
Replace the eXisting play equipment with new safety compliant
apparatus All sand to be removed and reSIlient surfacing Installed
Main Street between Line Street and Limited Avenue
Location
Actual to
FundIng Source Date 2006/2007 200712008 201312009 200912010 201012011 Total
COBG Fund #105 $100000 $100 000
Total Project Cost $100000 $100 000
Actual 06107 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 Total
Design $10700 $10700
Env Permit 0 0
RIW 0 0
Admin $6 800 $6 800
Construcbon Cost $75 000 $75 000
Conbngency $7 500 $7 500
AOENDA ITEM NO
PAOE 3 ,
(
OF \ 1> 1-
~~ II ~ r~-.....L..J / '7JL'U -,:: ~l..J.J..J. '(/--'-
X 1 ~ ~1fT/fff- ~ 7} ~
~ y ~ ;?T7li!:fIlrr' ~ ffJ/ ~
I '!:- 'If!1 / If ~ ~\~ 7);...... I
PROJECT AREA ~JllJfff U'~ ~ \ \.~ 0: (~:;::;
~ O-.Lai<<! Elsmore ifr=-- ' / ':::;j I \ ~ ~
-/ I~ ~ --.:; IT"'"
r.2k .'~ _)" ~ 111m
~7A\~ I/;~ ~'^'~~
~I.l~\:'\ ~~l 1\ -~~
~~ ~ /// -\'\{ T\ ~~ 7~ rn IfF
} ~ ~{I / ); ~
'II ~j % ~ ;/ '\ 'U'llIl/f'/TfTTT
'I ~~~ ~I
~rn:rfHH J
'/ PROJECT AREA Inn ~ L
,;;:JJ1
,~
~
~
~
~
~
I~
II
I
I
I ;r--
i\
,
*
Lai<<! Elsmore
.
City Of lake Elsmore
1308 M lOSt
lake Elsmore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www Iake-elsUlOfe org
I-
l-
/
Lakepoint
Park
",",y
.4 -'" 1,J,.~:il
~ ~ 0~t1i\~ ~~~~~"<S{ ~
~ !> .. ti:
~ ~ r
~ f7-~'-< ~ ,;> ~
.y '-" yF,;"r ,..
. I
"
. '
~, -
I
-i'.{ 'f,iJ<it'f I
I '"^t -,1"'1' ~j..l" \
,-.. ~p~
.>
rf, vr.... ""--<,~ I
,
~
,
, ~
;;-
I
,
,
~ ~
\
~
~~t
l '
m
. " I
l\8l!f'"
~h
f J" 1.
,;,b", 1....
~ 4 ,..
,
+
SENIOR CENTER EXPANSION
PROJECT 10 NUMBER PRK 0005
PROJECT NUMBER
-By
==-"'" ..C
............
-..........
Clfyo#Ub~GIS
-......
Avi:NDA ITE." NO (
PAGE ')1 OF \~ 1
('
('
("'\
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Caprtallmprovement Program
Project DescnptJon
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
PRK - 0005
Semor Center Expansion
Oescnptlon
ExpansIon of Semor Center annex building
420 lakeshore - adjacent to lake POint Park
Location
Actual 10
Fundlno Source Dale 200612007 200712008 200812009 2009/2010 2010/2011 Tolal
Unallocaled $190 000 $190 000
Revenue #105
Total Project Cost $190000 $190 000
Actual 06107 07/08 08109 09/1 0 10/11 Total
Design $20 000 $20 000
Env Penmt 0 0
R/W 0 0
Adrmn $18000 $18000
Construcbon Cost $138 000 $138000
Contingency $14000 $14000
ACENDA ITEM NO
PAGE ";) ':> _OF
I
,n_
--
---~----- -!--J:''''1112
II~~
I ----------_
.
+
City Of lake EIs nore
130 S MaUl Sl
lake Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674 3124
www Iake-etsanore 0 9
LAKE COMMUNITY CENTER LOBBY EXPANSION
PROJECT 10 NUMBER PRK 0006
PROJECT NUMBER
-....
.LM.~GIS
-....
-........
-.....,...
CllyV#L.Ih~GIS
_N0d03
AOErmA ITEM r.o
PACE 34.
1
OF \'l, 7
(\
(\
(\
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnpbon
PtPJect ID No
Project Number
Project Type
PRK - 0006
lake Community Center -lobby ExpansIon
DescnptJon
Expand lobby by relocatmg glass front doors and removing ticket
booth
Location
lake Community Center - 310 W Graham
Actualto
Funmllll Source Dale 200612007 200712008 2008/2009 200912010 201012011 TOlal
UnaUocaled $86 000 $86 000
Revenue #105
Tolal Project Cost $86 000 $86 000
Actual 06/07 07/08 08109 09/1 0 10/11 Total
Design $20 000 $20 000
Env Permit 0 0
RNI 0 0
Admin $18000 $18000
Construcbon Cost $44 000 $44 000
Conbngency $4 000 $4000
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE '>.5
l
OF-U. L
If>!/L I ~~ ill h"C:'//fjfjj~A ~ I../r
\ 1 - p % :--:--:cl.-")-- 'fti ~
.~ III 'IJJIll ~ fjJ ~
'I "L / R-"""< t--
~ 1L~ ~>o ~Ij:;' 1JillJ;I;
\
~ N ~!::!: /. -;:0-:: J// fir
I -":::::'~fl --~
PROJECT AREA 7!Jll r!J, ;:L \
~
~ ./~ I k ;/.
~ Lake E{$l1lore W (jj r--, ~
11 / ~ "-- 'J rlll/lli7: J /:::-{ J)- \'w
~ ;02
~/ / '--..... /..! --..::::: ~
...,'" It, /,~ ^\~
N v "7 If~- , ..),0 0 f/
~ .. -~ <(~g
~ 7~~~f-- /1/:1 ~ ) ~ y .2' ~ ~
C\'
~ '\ / <l). (%~
'I ~~ ~ {;' I'll J~'\~/^~ >%
~ Lj ~~ / '/ T'\ l> ~0
'I ~ ~ \ \ '( Y1J.fJ/7,
1% (IU/
W j b~ mJHB ~
~ :--
'r
f. ,,, ' I
'/1 PROJECT AREA Ian n-.- ",,,> ~
!1 r ":~
v ~
0 I t
I---- "
11tt
I
/ -
Lakepolnt
Park I
, ~-, J
~ /
I &',,,,) ""0
,
, I
LQke Elsmore , ~ I
---.,
- I '- '>:.-..r.
J
,< ~"'~ 'wo ~",........... r~(;. V
" "" "'", -d Y \
I
/ ! " ,
^"., "" --j /7
~ ~!_, " . ~ "j-. "~l:: -f .,"" 11
. . ., . ~"'J. -.r~I' J$ "
<r w> 1~"./liM '"
. +
SENIOR CENTER EXPANSION
PROJECT 10 NUMBER PRK 0007 -...
City Of Lake ElSinore PROJECT NUMBER __GIS
130 S Main St .....-
--
lake ElsInOre CA 92530 -- GIS
(951) 674 3124 "".".- -...
---
www lake-elsanore org
ACENDA ITEM NO {
.PAGE 3& OF \"bl
(1
(',
n
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 CapJtallmprovement Program
Project Descnpbon
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
PRK - 0007
Semor Center Expansion
Description
ExpansIon of Senior Center malO bUIlding
location
420 lakeshore - adjacent to lake POint Park
Actual 10
Fundana Source Dale 200612007 200712008 200812009 200912010 201012011 Total
Unallocaled $364 500 $364 500
Revenue #105
Total Project Cost $364 500 $364 500
Actual 06/07 07/08 08109 09/10 10/11 Total
Design $20 000 $20 000
Env Permit 0 0
RIW 0 0
Admin $18000 $18000
ConstructJon Cost $44 000 $44 000
Conbngency $4 000 $4 000
I
20 Do 0
I
If; 000
l{ '-II "u 0
'f Q"\.lu
[gc'loao/
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE ~ 1
1
OF \'111
Five Year Capital Improvement Projects LIsting 2006/2007 through 2010/2011
Street Mamtenance Capital Projects
Iproject J[)I Pro]ect No IProJect Title
-0061
STR 0002
STR-<lOO4
STR-0067
STR-0008
STR-OOll
STR-0019
STR-0020
4240
4024
4128
4165
4257
4261
I EstImated T otall
500 000
100 000
800 000
100 000
550 000
400 000
465 000
98 000
Total Street Mamtenance capital proJectsl $3,013,000 I
I
u
u
u
ACENDA ITEM NO-J--
PACE '?> 1> OF ..lh. L
~/~~j//7/~VJJ/O;~ ~ (I ~ ,/~I~-i!ffF~1
~ b ~~ ~",jl//7;JJiJi rtl f/i;;
'~-^,.~ J~ 't 'I" ~~ ~
~ ~ ~ i~
T - ::--::: 1-""""
7; t;;y '- ~n 7J? _7 ~~::-
if, ~~d ,~:;;: ~= ---- fit
"l~ rlj/~ ~ - ,
-:::: I \ "- ~ ::::!f;J!J: 0/
----- / ~
, 11 r '--- '-' rfqiJj ~ ~ 1IlJ
?:: -!!. 'J 't- ~ -r:::/; -!:, r:r:J:'~ A
~ ~ 1ft, PROJECT AREA ~/Sl' 1 iJrc :::
1/ '::::: 11:. <-L1J /' _11 '7/~ 1/1, 1;;;:; 'I ~ '-, , :::;
J!J;. k ~ ;0/1 , jJ[ If "-" ~ ~
ilL, LJ/!r;, '--J W ~ "-' , ~ r I" ~
~ ~J, i/ii; 0 Ii - - ~ fl. IJ;; ~
~ flj 1/ 14,"" r
:-:s 'd,,[ I ~ ~!!(1 -.......,
I( ----'::-:>1 II ~ r---. t-i,/ / ~ I
I( 1//1-fi/ILj r~ ~ /"11f I J. "rJJ.
~ r ~ ~ '::--I.-J T
~ J ~ ~ ~~ llLrf!J2 r ]~
~ / IJ:-:::::: .:2' I r~
'" ~ ~ ~
:-< ~ ~/J~~ '~
'J!rV ~
':::--I / ~" '< /: ~
Lake Elsmore n~ ~~~0 (
j,~1jf &.""r 'j
; . ,;. . .;.' . . ..:.~
1/;~1,'-J. '~"^' ~p ~~ I
. +
CURB GUTTER AND SIDEWALK REPAIR FOR SPRING STREET
PROJECT ID NUMBER STR-IIOO1 -By
city Of Lake ElsInore PROJECT NUMBER ...-....
130 S Main Sl -....
-.......
Lake EIsmore CA 92530 _,,-GIS
(95') 674 3'24 Cl)'oII..Oe.-. GIS
wwwJake-elstnOf8 0fQ --
ACENDA ITEM NO l
PACE '\ ~ OF ,~l_
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Description
u
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
STR-0001
4240
Curb Gutter and Sidewalk Installation for Spring Street
Descnptlon
Repair and construct curbs gutters and sidewalks on the South side of
Spring Street at Peck Street
Location
Spring Street between Graham Avenue and Heald Avenue
Ac\Uallo
Fundma Source Date 2006/2007 200712008 200812009 200912010 201012011 Total
CDBG #150 $200 000 $300 000 $500 000
I
, )
I
Total Project Cost $200 000 $300 000 $500 000
Actual 06/07 07/08 08109 09110 10/11 Total
Design $30 000 $30 000
Env Permit $5 000 $5 000
RNI
Admin $5 000 $5 000 $10 000
Construcbon $160000 $250 000 $410000
Conbngency $45 000 $45 000
u
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE 1.,.0 OF
~ .
,
. ..
..
~ ~
ol'P ~
~'?'
. ..
. , , . .
I I
o 2.500 5,000
10000 Feet
.
-+
City Of Lake e.mor.
130S MamSl
Lake E!slnono CA 92530
(951) 67.c-;!124
wwwlaluHlstnore org
ANNUAL CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM
PROJECT 10 NUMBER STR..ooo2
PROJECT NUMBER 4024
-..,.
"'_GIS
--
....-
-'--'"
Qyolua.a.r-.ElfS
-.....
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE 4\ OF \~'1_
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Caprtallmprovement Program
Project Descnptlon
()
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
STR-0002
4024
Annual Curb Gutter and Sidewalk Repair Progra~
DescrIPtion
Repair or replace damaged curbs gutters and Sidewalks at vanous locations
throughout the City This IS an annual project desIgned to maintain the
eXisting faCIlities The total expenditure does not Incl~de the current year
amounts
Location
Vanous locations throughout the City
Actual to I
FundIng Source Date 200612007 200712008 200812009 200912010 201012011 Total
Gas Tax#110 $20 000 $20 000 $20000 $20000 $20000 $20 000 $80 000
Measure A #112 $75 809 90 $80 000 $80 000 $80000 $80 000 $80 000 $420 000
I (
'I ...
Total Project Cost $95 809 90 $100000 $100000 $100000 $100 000 $100000 $500000
II
II
Actual 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 Total
Design
Env Permit $750 $1 000 $1 000 $1 000 $1 000 $1 000 $5 000
RIW
Admin $2 500 $3 000 $3 000 $3 000 $3 000 $3 000 $15000
Construcbon $92 559 90 $95 000 $95 000 $95 000 $95 000 $95 000 $480 000
ContIngency
u
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE 4~
OF~
I
.. ..
"
..
..
.. ,
~o~
.. ..
. , I . .
I I
o 2400 4.eoo
9,600 Fee<
.
+
CIty Of lake EIstnore
1305 MalIl5l
lake EIsmore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www lake-elsinore org
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT tD NUMBER STR-clOO4
PROJECT NUMBER
-""
.-_=
...-
--
___GIS
ClyofLW~GtS
--.....
PACE ~) OF~
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Pn;)Ject Descnptlon
u
PrOject JD No
Project Number
Project Type
STR-0004
Pavement Management Program
Descnptlon
As a part of the GASB 34 requirements a street Inventory was developed
and surveys for rating the condItion of the streets have been conducted
annually The data collected has been Incorporated mto the City s Mlcro-
f
Paver Database This database prOVides Staff a systematic approach to
pavement maintenance and thiS project provides funding ,for the maintenance
through asphalt overlays and slurry seal projects II
II
A portion ofthls program In the annual amount of $100 000 IS earmarked to
asphalt unpaved roads II
II
City Wide
Location
I
Actual to I
Fundlno Source Date 200612007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 Total
Gas Tax #110
Measure A #112 $800 000 $1000000 $1 000 000 $1000000 $1 000 000 $4 800 000
Total Project Cos1 $800 000 $1 000 000 $1 000 000 $1000000 $1 000 000 4 800 000
Actual 06/07 07/08 08109 09/10 10/11 Total
Design $45 000 $45 000 $45 000 $45 000 $45 000 $225 000
Env Permit 0 0 0 0 0 0
RIW 0 0 0 0 I 0 0
Admin $20 000 $20 000 $20 000 $20 000 $20 000 $100000
ConstructJon $695 000 $895 000 $895 000 $895 000 $895 000 $4 275 000
Conbngency $40 000 $40 000 $40 000 $40 000 $40 000 $200 000
u
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE 4'"
J
OF~ \_
I
.. ~
"
..
'10
~ i
~~~ ~
1
~..
I I . I .
r ,
o 2400 4800
9600 Feet
.
-+
ANNUAL TRAFFIC STRIPING MAINTENANCE
City Of lake EIslnore
1305 MaUlS.
L.8ke Elstnore CA 92530
(951) ~74-3124
WtNW Iake-eJsinore org
PROJECT ID NUMBER STR-e007
PROJECT NUMBER 4128
-By
~~GIS
--
--
-"""""''''''
OIy",.....ssu-.GIS
-..,
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE ~5
OF \'6'L
-
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
u
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
ProJ~t Type
STR-0007
4128
Annual Traffic Stnplng Maintenance
DescrIPtion
Refresh traffic stnplng and traffic legends at various locations throughout the
City This IS an annual project Intended to maintain the City-wide traffic
striping
Location
Various Locations throughout the City
Actual to II
Fundmg Source Date 200612007 2007/2008 200812009 200912010 201012011 Total
Gas Tax #110 $7 000 $7 000 $7 000 $7 000 $7000 $7000 $28 000
Measure A #112 $93000 $93 000 $93000 $93 000 $93 000 $93 000 $472 000
I I .)
I""'
Total Prolect Cost $100 000 $100000 $100000 $100000 $100000 $100000 $500 000
Actual 06/07 07/08 08109 09/10 10/11 Total
Design $5 000 $5 000 $5 000 $5 000 $5 000 $5 000 $25 000
Env Permit 0 0 0 0 0 0
RIW 0 0 0 0 0 0
Admin $5 000 $5 000 $5 000 $5 000 $5 000 $5 000 $25 000
ConstruclJon $84 000 $84 000 $84 000 $84 000 $84 000 $84 000 $420 000
Conbngency $6000 $6 000 $6 000 $6 000 $6000 $6000 $30 000
o
I
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE !;b
1
OF~:L
)
I
I
---J
c
.
..
City Of Lake ElsiJlOl"Q
130 S Main SL
Lake Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www Iake-etsinore org
CASINO DRIVE BRIDGE SEISMIC RETROFIT
PROJECT ID NUMBER STRoOOO8
PROJECT NUMBER 4165
-""
....-...
--
--
---....
Qyt#I.Ia~SS
--
PAGE 4'\.. OF~ 1_
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnpbon
u
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
STR-0008
4165
Casino Dnve Bndge Seismic Retrofit
Descnptlon
Install Improvements to the Casino Dnve Bndge This project Will reqUire
compliance with Caltrans local Assistance Procedures Staff IS waiting for
approvals from Caltrans and this project has been earned over from the
prevIous year I
Location
Casino Dnve Over-crossing Northwest of San Jacinto Road
Actual to
Funding Source Date 2006/2007 200712008 200812009 200912010 201012011 Total
Measure A #112 $65 000 $65 000
Gas Tax #110 $485 000 $485 000
'J
I
Total Project Cost $65 000 $485 000 $550 000
Actual 06107 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 Total
Design $50 000 $50 000
Env Permit
RIW
Admin $15000 $15000
ConstnucIJon $440 000 $440 000
Conbngencv $45 000 $45 000
(J
ACENDA ITEM NO
PAGE 4'1
I
OF--1R-C
~I
a:
w
ID
W
0:
.
-+
Crty Of lake Elslno e
130 S Mam St
take EIsmore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
WWW lake-elsmore org
POWER POLE RELOCATION
PROJECT JD NUMBER STR-001f
PROJECT NUMBER 4257
-'"
....-...
--
--
-"-'"
ar,.oIL*~GIS
--
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE ~ l\.
OF ,~Il
.
City of Lake Elslhore
2006 2011 Caprtallmprovement Program
Project Descnptlon
(j
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
STR-0011
4257
Power pole relocation
1\
I
Descnptlon
Relocate the power po1es near the Intersection of Auto Center Dnve
and Franklin Avenue
Location
Intersection of Auto Center Dnve and Franklin Avenue
Actual to
Funding Source Date 200612007 200712008 200812009 200912010 201012011 Total
St. Impin1l1 $172000 11000 183 000
Measure A #112 $3 000 214 000 217000
II
I
I l
-I
Total Project COst $175000 225 000 400 000 I
Actual 06107 07108 08109 09110 10111 Tolal
Design 10000 10000
Env Pennlt 19000 I 19000
RIW
Admin $10 000 6000 I 16000
Construcbon $136 000 184000 320 000
Conbngency 35 000 II 35000
u
AGENDA ITEM NO ~
PAGE So OF (f1
.
+
RAILROAD CANYON ROAD SLOPE REPAIR
City Of lake ElSloore
1308 MatnSt
ake Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www lake-elsmore org
PROJECT ID NUMBER STR-G019
PROJECT NUMBER
-BY'
-..........
--
....-
_",,-60S
Cllyolu.~GrS
--
AGENDA ITEM NO
PACE 5 \ OF \'7>11
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Caprtallmprovement Program
Project DescnptJon
u
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
STR-0019
4261
Railroad Canyon Road Slope Repair
Oescnpbon
Provide for slope repaIrs along Railroad Canyon Road Preliminary
design was questioned by Staff and an alternate Geotechmcal
Engineer was ultimately used
Location
Railroad Canyon Road
Actual to
Fundlll!l Source Date 200612007 200712008 200812009 200912010 201012011 Total
Railroad Canyon
Road Benefit Dsstnct $5 000 $460 000 $465 000
#254
\
I
Total Project Cost $5000 $460 000 , $465 000
Actual 06107 07108 08109 09/10 10/11 Total
Design $5 000 $5 000
Env Pennlt
RIW
AdmIn $10000 $10000
Construcbon $420 000 $420 000
Conbngency $30 000 $30 000
(j
AOENLlA ITEM NO 1
PAGE S~ OF 'l"{
.
CIIy 01 Lake ElsInore
130 S MaIO Sl
-.aka EIsmore CA 92530
(951) 614-3124
wwwlake-elsanore 0fQ
Lal# Elsinore
+
LAKESHORE DRIVE HISTORIC STREET LIGHT RENOVATION
PROJECT 10 NUMBER STR",,020
PROJECT NUMBER
-....
__GIS
--
--
___GIS
atytlt'Ubarnor. 81'$
--
_ 5)_-0' --,'1:>-[_
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2011 Caprtallmprovement Program
Project Desenptlon
u
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
STR-0020
Lakeshore Dnve Histone Street light Renovation
Descnptlon
Refurbish eXisting street lights along Lakeshore Dnve In the
Country Club Heights area
Lakeshore Dnve between Chaney Street and Mannmg Street
I
I
I
Location
Aclualto I
Fundloo Source Date 200612007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 Total
LlMD #130 $2 500 $97 500 'I $100 000
I
,
II
-
I
~
Total proJect Cost $2,500 $97 500 $100 000
Actual 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 Total
Oeslgn $2 500 $2 500
Env Permit
RIW
Admin $5 500 $5 500
Construcbon $85 000 $85000
Conbngency $7 000 $7 000
'-
()
AOENDA ITE'VI NO
PACE " "t
1
OF ,~f(
)
Five Year Capital Improvement Projects Llstmg 2006/2007 through 2010/2011
(-
Traffic Capital Projects
IProject ID IproJect No IproJect litle' I Esbmated Total'
TRF-0003 4251
TRF-OOU 4227
TRF-0012 4252
TRF-0013 4244
TRF-0014 4262
TRF-0015
TRF-0016
468 000
550 000
3 070 354
2 960 000
694 232
32 200 000
32 200 000
Total Traffic CapItal ProJects~ 72,142,586 I
(\
(-
ACENDA ITEM NO l
PAGE 5S OF~
lJ
Lake ElslfIore
/1;1
//
o 200 400 800 Feet
"
"
.
+
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
City Of Lake EIs nore
130$ ManSl
lake EJsIflOl'8 CA 92530
(951) 674 3124
www Iake-e1s1f1O e org
PROJECT 10 NUMBER TRF-G003
PROJECT NUMBER
-....
..._"'"
-.....
--
-"-"'"
CllyolLeh~GIS
--
A ITEM NO
PACiE 5b OF IVl
(\
('
(\
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
TRF-0003
4251
Traffic Signal Installation and Intersection Improvements
Description
Construct Intersection Improvements mcludlng a Traffic signal at the
mtersectlon of Grand Avenue and Ortega Highway A traffic signal warrant
study has been conducted and met at this location Intersection
enhancements Include addrtJonallanes for turmng movements
Location
Grand Avenue and Ortega Highway
Acluallo
Funding Source Dale 200612007 200712008 200812009 200912010 201012011 Total
Measure A #112 $65 000 $65 000
Traffic Signal #204 $30 000 $73 000 $103 000
TUMF Zone
Funds #105 $300 000 $300 000
Total Project Cost $95 000 $373 000 $468 000
Actual 06107 07/08 08/09 09/1 0 10/11 Total
Design $75 000 $75 000
Pe/1llJl $15000 $15000
Rm
Admin $5 000 $13000 $18000
Construcbon $330 000 $330 000
Conbngency $30 000 $30 000
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE 51. OF
I
\~ 1
.
+
City Of Lake Elsrnore
130 S Maln St
lake Elsmore CA 92530
(951) 6743124
www 1ake-ets1llOCe org
RAILROAD CANYON ROADJI-15 PROJECT REPORT
PROJECT 10 NUMBER. TRF~011
PROJECT NUMBER 4227
-""
... .,.-.""
--
--
-.......""
ClJ'oIUh~GIS
--
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE 'S ~
1
OF \% 1
(\
n
"
('\
City of lake ElsInore
2006 2016 Caprtallmprovement Program
Project Descnptlon
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
TRF-0011
4227
Railroad Canyon Road/I 15 Project Report
Descnptlon
Develop a Project Report pursuant to Caltrans Local Assistance
procedures ThiS report wdlldentlfy the mitigating project for the 1-
15/Rallroad Canyon Road Interchange Improvement project
Intersection of Railroad Canyon Road and Interstate 15
Location
Actual to
Funding Source Date 200612007 200712008 200812009 200912010 2010/2011 Total
TIF #205 $200 000 $350 000 $550 000
Total Project Cost $200 000 $350 000 $550 000
Actual 06107 07/08 08/09 09/10 10111 Total
DesIgn $200 000 $300 000 $500 000
Env Permit
R/W"
Admin $50 000 $50 000
Construcbon
Conbngency
AGENDA ITEM NO I '\
PACE 5'\ OF \'i,
~ ---.
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
1/
.
SR 7411-15 INTERCHANGE INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT ID NUMBER TRF-G012
PROJECT NUMBER
+
City Of lake Elsanore
130S ManSt
lake Etsrnore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
wwwJake-eJs1JlO e org
-""
...--
--
--
-......-
CllyolL*~GIS
---
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE_bO OF
'1
,~l_
(\
(\
n
City of lake Elsinore
2006 2016 Caprtallmprovement Program
Project Description
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
TRF-0012
4252
SR-74/1-15 Interchange Interim Improvements
Descnptlon
Design and construct roadway Wldemng on State Route 74
between Dexter Avenue and the Southbound on/off ramps
Location
Intersection of State Route 74 (Central Avenue) and Interstate 15
Actual to
Fundong Source (~ 200612007 200712008 200812009 200912010 201012011 Tn""
Developer fair share I ( $90 345 ;>
Trallic Sa~ty (115) '------' $150 000 $100 000
Gas Tax (110) $600 000 $600 000
Measure A (112) $10000 $390 000 $400 000
T EA (105) $310000 $310000
CoIy TIF (205) $520000 $520000
TUMF $1 000 000 $1 000 000
Total Prolect Cost $100 354 $2 970 000 $3 070 354
Actual 06/07 07/08 08/09 09110 10/11 Total
Design $90 354 $90 354
Env Permit $15000 $15000
RNV
Admm $10000 $50 000 $60 000
Construcbon $2 725 000 $2725 000
Conbngency $180000 $180 000
ACENDA ITEM NO~
PACE 6 \ OF \~ I
I
~~
I
-
J rn
!l(J;;r
,{y
PROJECT AREA
-
'~$1,wJio~ ,..:,"'"
l - t') T
~
~
-
~
~c
~,__oo
i~~~
~ ~ I V: ~~
':::
-
/1
,r-:
S t;y7
I" 9:-
~
Q
....., lI\ II
~
1=
IDIIJ ~E
1::1::
I::
I
w ~ iHl,
~ PROJECT AREA
.
n~ ~ l;:' )Vr' III
~lmll ~)K~ ~<\\\
( ,f ,\ ~\
qm~ h ') 1~(j~~
'fHh 'Jil Jjf-, ~ ~ ~
/Il/ ~I ~
~~
~
~'/::
,f;;;;j t: /
I I
.
I,
~
:c:
~1Jt
i~~~
.
~~
t'J1
~
1/
II/ntl
[/,
III~
;AI,'-
J' /\-llr
~i.U
, -~
~~~
./
&- 75~1I Hf'~J
+
RAILROAD CANYON ROAD/1-15 INTERIM INTERCHANGE PROJECT
City Of Lake Elsrnore
1305 MalnSI
lak ElsInOre CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www lake-elsanore org
PROJECT 10 NUMBER TRF-0013
PROJECT NUMBER 4244
_Or
.-s.-.GlS
-.... /
--
-"-"'"
CllyolUh~GI$
-....
ACENDA ITEM NO 1
PACI1, 6'd... OF \'b'l
(1
(1
n
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
TRF-0013
4244
Railroad Canyon Roadll 15 Intenm Interchange Project
Description
Implement Intenm Improvements Including Wldenmg on all on and
off ramps widen the freeway under crossmg to accommodate
addlttonal lanes and provide addlttonal turmng movement lanes on
the local roadway
location
Intersectton of Railroad Canyon Road and Interstate 15
Actual to
Fund,"!! Source Date 200612007 200712008 200812009 200912010 201012011 Total
TI F #205 $166 000 $221 000 $387 000
Railroad Cnyn Rd
Benefit Dlst #254 $1 800 000 $500 000 $2 300 000
Developer Share $163 000 $163~
Potential T1F $110000 $110
Total Project Cost $1 966 000 $884 000 $2 960 000
Actual 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 Total
DeSign $91 000 $91 000
Env Penmt
RNI/"
Adrmn $75 000 $46 300 $121 300
Construcbon $1 800 000 $700 000 $2 500 000
Conbngency $137700Y $137000
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE b -;.
I
OF \1> 1
I I
I I
! I
I ,
_L-.
I
r----j-- --
t=i
--r- ~___J
I
----I
I
~-- --L
---I -
;
I
!
I
I
I
L
I
u
,
.
SR 74/1-15 PROJECT REPORT
+
Ctty Of lake Elsinore
130 S MaIO 8t
lake Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-312.
www Iake--eJsJoore org
PROJECT ID NUMBER TRF..o014
PROJECT NUMBER
-By
................
Apdt200f
....-
-............
CIty or LaN Ebi*-. GIS
--
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE 64 OF
,
1
'~17
(\
n
n
City of lake Elsmore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnpbon
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
TRF-0014
4262
SR 74/1-15 Project Report
Description
Develop a Project Report pursuant to Caltrans local Assistance
procedures This report wlllldenbfy the mmgabng project for the 1-
15/State Route-74 mterchange Improvement project
location
Intersection of State Route 74 and Interstate 15
Actual to
Funding Source Date 200612007 200712008 200812009 200912010 201012011 Total
TUMF 105 $120000 $574,232 $694 232
Total Project Cost $120000 $574232 $694 232
Actual 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 Total
Design $120000 $424 232 $544 232
Env Pennot
RIW'
Admin $150000 $150000
ConstructJon
Conbngency
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE l, ~ OF
1
\'lfL
I
T
~ I
~ I
~\
?:{ , i
.:
~ "1~
rt
~/; ~
-
[] ~~
b ~Itv~
~ .~
PROJECT AREA
-
~~
1V
~
-
--
~c
.., ~"&..~~
i ~~~~~~
~~ ~IT ~r':l<(1 7':
~ / 11 ~,(\Wffl
'" ~~
1 ~ Y,~n
l.~
w
~ PROJECT AREA
n ~ .... ~
-,,~"" 'fJ
II
I I
fir
:2
/
~~,~
11/
L-/I~
)
UI
I:
;ll
,<< II
l'''"'t:....."
v~ ';;J>
-"- ~
,--::: ,,'-" '"
'- "'- ~
'///
.,
>'A
=
~
~~
"
~ T
~I
, ~3 / /
~"
I l
"V
-\~~ ~~5
7~L\- I\~~/
.
+
City Of Lake Elsinore
1305 MamSt.
Lake Elsinore CA 92530
(951)674-312'
www lake--els nore rg
RAILROAD CANYON ROAD/115 INTERCHANGE (TUMF)
PROJECT 10 NUMBER TRF..o015
PROJECT NUMBER
-By
__GIS
--
....-
__GIS
Clltfll&.llleSllDlftGrS
-......
1Tt::MNU, I
PAGE 6(, OF \'b 1,
{\
City of lake ElsInore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
I
I
I
TRF-0015
Railroad Canyon Roadll151nterchange (TUMF)
Oescnpbon
Develop a desIgn and program for the construction of 1-15/Rarlroad
Canyon Road Interchange reconfiguratlon
Locabon
Intersection of Railroad Canyon Road and Interstate 15
(\
Actual to
Fundlll!/ Source Date 200612007 200712008 200812009 200912010 201012011 Tolal
TUMF#105 $1000000 $15000000 $16200000 $32 200 000
Tolal Project Cost $1 000 000 $1S 000 000 $16 200 000 $32 200 000
Actual 06107 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 Total
Design $1 000 000 $1 000 000
Env Permit
FWI*
Admin $75 000 $25 000 $100000
Construcbon $14 925 000 $16 175000 $31 100000
Conbngency
(\
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE bl OF
r-
J
\
.
SR 7411 15 INTERCHANGE (TUMF)
PROJECT 10 NUMBER TRF~016
PROJECT NUMBER 4262
+
Crty Of lake EIs no e
130 S MalO Sl
lake Elsinore CA 92530
(951)6743124
www lake-.elsinore org
-""
....-...
--
--
-"-"""'"
Cll:rot Late S:sbre GIS
--
l
\~l
AGENDA ITEM NO
PACE 61 OF
('
n
('
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 CapJtallmprovement Program
Project Descnptlon
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
TRF-0016
4262
SR-74/1-15 Inte,rchange (TUMF)
Descr/pbon
Develop a design and program for the construction of the
Interchange at SR-74/1-15
Locabon
Intersection of State Route 74 and Interstate 15
t1I
I
Actual to $3&-
Fund,"!! Source Date 2006/2007 200712008 200tll2069 200912010 201012011
TUMF #105 $1 000 000 $15000000 $16200000
Total Project Cost $1 000 000 $15 000 000 16200000 $32,200 000
Actual 06/07 07/08 08109 09/10 10/11 Total
DesIgn $1 000 000 $1 000 000
Env Permit
R/W" $75 000 $25 000 $100000
Admin $14 925 000 $16175000 $31 100000
Construcbon
Conbngency
I)" 10." J tf\:J\')
I OuO 000
/ I
1(.. VOl 11"0
) I _____
~ 0,,0
'1 1-/1.- i> 0 /
AGENDA ITEM NO
PACE 6\
]
OF~
~
~
FIve Year CapItal Improvement Projects Llstmg 2006/2007 through 2010/2011
General CIty CapItal Projects U
IProject IDIProject No I Project TItle EstImated Total I
GEN 0001 4209 Annualllbrarv Book Purchase & BUlldma Fund Contnbubon 80.000
GEN-0002 Storaae Area Network UDorade 50 000
GEN 0003 4253 General Plan Uodate ~ 825 000
GEN 0004 4250 Palm Tree Preservabon Proaram ~ 100.000
GEN 0009 1GB Network SWitch UDorade $ 15 000
GEN-oOI0 Olck2Gov Server Purchase 10.000
GEN 0011 Document Manaoement SYStem (oMS) Pilot 25.000
GEN 0012 Enteronse Network Pnnter Reolacement 30.000
GEN 0013 IT Room Infrastructure Renovabon ~ 30.000
GEN 0014 Communltv Dlallna Informabon System (IVR) $ 40000
GEN 0015 H T E/GlS Inteorabon(aka Lookulo GlasS) ~ 40.000
GEN 0016 Brandmo Pr01ect ~ 243 000
GEN 0017 Rosetta Canvon Fire Stabon & Communltv Center $1 3.678.000
GEN 0018 OVIC Center Feaslbliii:V StUdV ~ 125.000
Total General City Capital ProJect5U 5,291,000 I
u
u
ACENDA ITEM NO 1
PACE '10 OF ~ 1-
~
~~
~
1
I
1---
I
I
I
/
"
"
Lake ElsmQre
-",-
I. I .-----.......
o 900 1800' . >~.b,t...' J
.
+
City Of Lake Elsinore
1305 Ma
lakeEI lOSt
S1nore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www IaI<e-etsinore
0Ill
ANNUAL LIBRA
RY BOOK
PROJECT 10 N PURCHASE
PROJECT N~::EER GEN.oo01
R 4209
-By
.--
-.... ...
....-
-
CM:rt1lUlc~Gl'$
....",..:::- GIS
ACENDA 11m r~o
PACE -, \
1
OF \~l
CIty of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Caprtallmprovement Program
Project Descnpbon
u
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
GEN-0001
4209
Annual library Book Purchase and Building Fund
Contnbubon
Descnpbon
ProvIde for the purchase of addlbonal library books and matenals
on an annual basIs Book purchase will be split between two library
sights A portion of the library mOnies will be put towards
construction of a new library
Locabon
Vanous locabons
Actual to
FundIng Source Date 200612007 200712008 200812009 200912010 201012011 Total
IJbrary Fund #231 $40 000 $10000 $10000 $10000 $10000 $80 000
Book Purchase (
IJbrary Fund #231 $40 000 $50 000 $30 000 $30 000 $30 000 $180000 "-
BuDding Fund
T olal ProJBCt Cost $80 000 $60 000 $40 000 $40 000 $40 000 $260 000
Actual 06107 07/08 08109 09/10 10/11 Total
DesIgn
Env Permit
RM/
AdmIn
CapItal Outlay $80 000 $60 000 $40 000 $40 000 $40 000 $260 000
ContJngency
u
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE l~
I
OF ''b 7
.
City Of Lake EJsmore
1308 Main SL
.ake Elsrnore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www lake-elsmore org
I
r
50
100
"'-
+
STORAGE AREA NETWORK UPGRADE (SANS)
PROJECT 10 NUMBER GEN-G002
PROJECT NUMBER
-'"
........... ...
--
--
__GJS
C8yolLalleSliTltoNGI$
--
AGENDA ITEM NO
PAGE 73 OF \'g 1_
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 CapItal Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
I
I
I
I
u!
I
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
GEN - 0002
Storage Area Network Upgrade (SANS)
Description
The increasing volume of GIS and related data requIres Increased
network system storage and secure file management ThIS
mISSIon cntlcal" project would Integrate a SANS solution wrth the
CIty s eXIsting servers and network to provIde needed data storage
and future capacIty For example due to Its sIZe the City s dlgrtal
aenal data acqUIsItion (expected In September 2006) can only be
used and run WIth the addItion of thIS system
An orgamzatlonal preparedness InitIative per the IT strategIc plan
Location
City Hall
Actual to Total ( ,
FundIng Source Date 200612007 200712008 200812009 200912010 201012011
General Fund 100 $50 000 $50 000
Total ProjeCt Cost $50 000 $50 000
Actual 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 Total
DeSign
Env Penmt
RIW ,
AdmIn $50 000 $50 000
Construcbon Cost
Conbngency
()
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE ., It
I
OF \% l-
, I I I I I I
o 2.500 5 000
10 000 Feel
.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
PROJECT 10 NUMBER GEN-GO03
PROJECT NUMBER
-+
City Of Lake Elsinore
,.-..tOO S Mam St
r Isrnore CA 92530
!l51) 674 3124
www lake-elslllOfe org
-By
....-...
--
...........
-.........
~"'Ub~GI$
_.....
PACE-l'i...OF \~'l
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
()
Project 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
GEN-0003
4253
General Plan Update
Descnpt/on
ThIS project provides for the study and update of the CIty'S General
Plan The update will Include all elements of the General Plan
Location
CIty Wide
Actual to ,
"
Fundmg Source Dale 200612007 2007/2008 200812009 2009/2010 201012011 Tolal
Mise Gen PrOJ 11
#105 from #100 $386 000 $439000 $825 000
II
11
I
(
i "-
I
I
T olal PrOject Cost $ 386 000 $439 000 $825 000
II
Actual 06/07 07/08 08109 09/10 10/11 Total
Design $386 000 $439000 $825 000
Env Pennlt
RNI
Admin
Construction
Conbngency
v
AOENDAITEM NO~
PACE 'lb OF \~L
I , . I I 'I
o 2.500 5.000
10000 Feet
.
PALM TREE PRESERVATION PROGRAM
+
Crly Of lake Elsloore
0.1308 MaInSt
d Elsmore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www Iake-etsJnore org
PROJECT 10 NUMBER GEH-fIOO4
PROJECT NUMBER
_Or
....-....
--
....-
__GIS
CJIt'.,.....~GJS
--
ACENDAITEM ,IQ(
PACE 1 \. OF -1JL-
CIty of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptron
u
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
GEN-Q004
4250
Palm Tree Preservatton Program
\I
II
Description
Palm trees have been Identified as a valuable natural resource 10
the City and thiS project will provIde for the preservatron of these
trees throughout the City
Location
City Wide
Actual 10 II
Fund.ng Source Dale 200612007 2007/2008 200812009 200912010 2010/2011 Total
Parks #221 $20000 $20000 $20000 $20 000 II $20 000 $100 000
I,
II
II
-
{
I -'-"
II
,
Total Project Cost $20 000 $20 000 $20 000 $20 000 $20 000 $100000
Actual 06107 07/08 0809 09/10 10/11 Tolal
Destgn
Env Permit
RIW
Admin $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $2 500
Transplant $19500 $19500 $19500 $19500 $19500 $97500
Conbngency
u
AOENDAITEM NO~
PAGE_ l~ OF.sb..:_
----------
.
+
City Of Lake Elsinore
130 S MaIO Sl
Lake EJsmore CA 92530
(951) 674-312'
www 1ake-e1s1llOre org
1GB NETWORK SWITCH UPGRADE
PROJECT 10 NUMBER GEN 0009
PROJECT NUMBER
-By
.... ...--GIS
....."'"
....-
_"",-GIS
QlyolLIN~6IS
--
AGENDA ITeM NO
PACE \~ OF
'1
\~L
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
u
Project 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
GEN - 0009
1 GB Network SWitch Upgrade
I
,
OeSCfll)tlon
To Increase network bandwidth thiS project replaces and upgrades
five (5) 24 port network switches from 101100 Mb to Gigabit speed
.n addition to replacing NIC cards with gigabit network Interface
cards In all networked City PCs An orgamzatJonal readiness
Initiative per the IT strategic plan
Proposed Installation date FY 2006-07
Location
City Hall
Actual to Total _ I,
FurxLrng Source Date 200612007 200712008 200812009 200912010 201012011
General Fund 100 $15000 $15 000 ( )
"-
Total Project Cost $15 000 $15000
Actual 06107 07108 08109 09/1 0 10/11 Total
Design
Env Permit
RIW
Admin $15000 , $15000
Construcbon Cost
Conbngency
()
AOENDA ITEM NO 1
PAGE '30 OF~ L
'!A.t,>>-_
~CQ",,,,~
.
City 01 lake E'.mor.
~ 130S MamSt
\ e Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
WWWJake-elslnore org
CLlCK2GOV SERVER PURCHASE
PROJECT 10 NUMBER GEN-0010
PROJECT NUMBER
+
-""
"'_GIS
--
--
__GIS
ClyclUte~ GIS
-......
PACE ~ \ of-LL
Il
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnpbon
I
I,
"
,
u
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
GEN - 0010
Cllck2Gov Server Purchase
Description
Web-based automated customer service Interface for bur/ding
permits & Inspecbon OCCUpabonal license research and renewal
HR Job appllcabons tracking and GIS Includes CIICk2Gov Web
browser-based software and licensing from Sungard HTE Inc
dedicated PC-based Web-server An e-govemment 'OIbatlve per
the IT strategic plan
Location
City Hall
Actual to Total ./
Funding Source Date 200612007 200712008 200812009 200912010 2010/2011
General Fund 100 $10000 $10000 . U
,
Tota' Project Cost $10000 $10000
Actual 06107 07/08 08109 09/1 0 10111 Total
DeSign
Env Perrmt
RIW ,
Admin $10000 I $10000
Conslrucbon Cost
Conbngency
u
ACENDA ITEM NO 1
PACE R~ OF~1
lJ4t~
~
o 45 00
.
DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (OMS) PILOT
PROJECT ID NUMBER GEN-G011
PROJECT NUMBER
+
CiIy Of Lake Elsono,e
~130S Mains.
( . Elslnore CA 92530
(951) 614-3124
www Ial<e-elslnore erg
_Br
...............
--
--
---...
CiIy.,... BIirIllqGfS
-"...,
PAGE '3
OF ,g'L
City of Lake E/slnore
2006-2016 Capita/Improvement Program
Project Descnpbon
()
PrOject /0 No
Project Number
Project Type
GEN - 0011
I'
I
I
Document Management System (DMS) Pdot
Description
An electronic document management system pl/ot project for
enterpnse level evaluabon Was proposed for City Clerk s office
per IT strategic plan LaserFlche (or comparable best practices
DMS system) Includes dedicated scanner network system storage
solution enterpnse software and licensing plus training An
Orgamzabonal Effectweness and Busmess Process Initiative per
the IT strategic plan Also an e-govemment Initiative
Location
City Hall
ActUal to
Fundmg Source Date
General Fund 100
200612007 200712008 2008/2009 200912010 201012011
$25 000
Total I
$25 000 I )
-
T olal Project Cost
$25 000
$25 000
Actual 06107 07/08 08109 09/1 0 10111 Total
DeSIgn
Env PermIt
R1W I
AdmIn $25 000 $25 000
Construcbon Cost
Conllngency
u
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE ~4
1
OF~_
~
~~
~
o
50 100
.
ENTERPRISE NETWORK PRINTER REPLACEMENTS
PROJECT 10 NUMBER GEN-G012
PROJECT NUMBER
+
CiIy Of Ulk. Elsmore
""130 S Main SL
r Elsinore CA 92530
, (951) 674-3124
www IaJte-.eJsIJlOfe org
-"'"
----....
--
--
-..........
ClyotLMeEbllJoNGfS
--
ACiENDA ITEM NO \ 1J.1
PAGel?:. OF ...,ll..! ~
CIty of lake Elsinore
2006-2011 Cap.tal Improvement Program
Project Descnpt.on
()
PrOject JD No
Project Number
Project Type
GEN - 0012
Enterpnse Network Pnnter Replacements
Descraptlon
Replaces IBM 6252 Impact /tne pnnter and IBM 4224 Impact
pnnter adds laser check-wnt.ng pnnter WIth enhanced secunty
features and propnetary software (to ,nterface with Sungard HTE
Inc system) Includes eqUIpment lease of additIonal Canon
ImageRunner or comparable network pnnters for Eng,neenng
IT/GIS Dept features fax scanning color and network pnntlng
options comb.ned An orgamzatlOnal read mess Inlt.atlve per the IT
strategIC plan
Location
City Hall (Finance, Eng.neenng ITIGIS Dept)
Actual 10 Total~)
FUndIng Source Date 200612007 200712008 200812009 2009/2010 2010/2011
General Fund 100 $30 000 $30 000
Total Project Cost $30 000 $30 000
Actual 06/07 07/08 08109 09/10 10/11 Total
Des'9n "
Env Pennlt
R/IN
AdlTlln $30 000 $30 000
Construcbon Cost
Conbngency
()
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE ~ b
I
OF~'L
.
-+
Cdy Of Lake Elsinore
F'\ 130 S Main Sl
( . EIsIno<e CA 92530
(951) 614-312.
WNW lake-elsmore Ofg
IT ROOM INFRASTRUCTURE RENOVATION
PROJECT ID NUMBER GEN.oo13
PROJECT NUMBER
-By
---...
--
--
___GIS
ary"'.....ea-.GJS
--
PACE '0 1 OF \'8 1-.
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptron
u
PrOject 10 N.o
PrOject Number
Project Type
GEN - 0013
IT Room Infrastructure Renovation
Description
A retrofit of the eXlstrng IT room for security environmental and
space utrllzatron Improvements Proposed project will add digital
secunty lock and keypad to the single entryway (tred to the City s
alarm system) replacement floor-mounted rack system retrofit kits
and cable management for racking network servers and new UPS
(battery back up) eqUipment addltronal power condltronlng air
condltronrng and IT cabrnet and furnrture replacements An
orgamzatlOnal read mess Inrtlatrve per the IT strategic plan
l
location
City Hall
Actual to Total U
Fundmg Source Date 200612007 200712008 200812009 200912010 201012011
General Fund 100 $30 000 $30 000
I
Total Prolect Cost $30 000 $30000
Actual 06107 07/08 08109 09/10 10/11 Total
Englneenng 3000 I,
EqUipment & furnIture 16000 I
RIW
AdmIn
ConstrucllOn Cost 8000
Conbngency 3000
U
ACENDA ITEM ~O I
PACE 9; () OF ~L
----~~
~,
------
.
COMMUNITY DIALING INFORMATION SYSTEM (IVR)
PROJECT 10 NUMBER GEN-8014
PROJECT NUMBER.
4-
Crty Of lake ElslfIore
130 S Main Sl
ke Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-312.
wwwlake-elslOOreorg
-...
....-...
- ....
--.-
-c-.....
Qyo#Uham-. GIS
--
PACE b\ OF \~ 1
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 CapItal Improvement Program
Project Oescnptlon
(J
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
GEN - 0014
I
I'
I
I
CommuOlty O,allng Information System (IVR) \
Descnptlon
IVR (Integrated VOice Response) technology allows cItizens and
customers to access the CIty'S computer system vIa telephone
automating transacbonal servIces such as permit status fees
Inspection requests or scheduling bus,ness licenses etc IVR can
also be used to DIAL OUT to any number of community telephone
numbers such as to provIde construction alerts or emergencylflood
hazard warOlngs for example An e-govemment and busmess
process Improvements 'OIbabve per the IT strategIc plan
Locabon
City Hall
Actual to Total l
Fund.ng Source Date 200612007 200712008 200812009 200912010 2010/2011
Grant E1eg.ble* $40 000 $40 000
Total Project Cost $40 000 $40 000
Actual 06/07 07/08 08109 09/10 10/11 Total
DesIgn
Env Pennlt I
RIW
Admin $40 000 $40 000
Construction Cost
Conbngency
Grant funding may '?e available for all or match amounts
ACENDA ITEM t.O
PACE '\ 0
()
l
OF~\_
/
_______ I
--~ I
------~
Cir8]-
J
I
!
!
I
!
/
I
I
~
---
-ft~ ~
__________"l"t:~
--
50
100
.
HTElGIS INTEGRATION (AKA lOOKING GLASS"')
PROJECT 10 NUMBER GEN-GOf5
PROJECT NUMBER
+
Cdy Of Lake EIsInoro
130S MalnSl
n Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
WNW lake-elslnore org
-....
'--...
--
--
-.........
Olyvlu.."""""GIS
--
AOENDA ITEM NO
PAOE '\ \ OF \'b J-
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
Description
Location
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
PrOject Descnptron
u
GEN - 0015
"
II
I'
I
I
HTElGIS Integratron (aka Looking GlaSSTM)
"
The City s enterpnse database system IS capable of GIS integration
uSing a third party software solutron developed In partnership wrth
ESRI and Sungard-HTE Inc called Looking Glass™ This project
Includes licensing thiS product and purchasing a dedicated PC-
based server to facllrtate public access to large GIS data files vIa
any Web browser or through secure Internal access via the CIty
Intranet Having an Integrated GIS tool will enable any HTE module
USing CIty land parcel data to access powerful GIS resources to
create visual displays customized maps and reports and
enhanced GIS analYSIS and modeling tools (e g Code'
Enforcement case plotting Weed Abatement actrvlty mapping
housIng construction actrVlty BUilding & Safety and permit activity
CFDs and RDA project area mapping etc)
An e-govemment Inltlatrve per the IT strategiC;; plan
()
City Hall
Actual to
Funding Source Date 200612007 2007/2008 200812009 2009/2010 2010/201 t Total
General Fund 100 $40 000 $40 000
\
\ I
Total Project Cost $40 000 $40 000
Actual 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 Total
DeSign
Env Permit
R/IN
Admin $40 000 $40 000
Construcbon Cost
Conbngency
Pomons may be grant eligible
u
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE '\ 'l
1
OFJ1-
I I I .' I I
o 2500 5.000
10000 Feet
.
BRANDING PROJECT
PROJECT ID NUMBER GEN-G016
PROJECT NUMBER
+
City Of Lake ElSinore
(";30 S Main St
Elsinore CA 92530
~ (951) 674-3124
WWWlake.elslllOfe org
-....
-_GIS
-....
--
-"-GIS
01)'01 t.h s.r.-. GIS
--
A
PACE ~ '3 OF
\'b' -r.
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 CapIta/Improvement Program
Project Descrrptlon
()
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
GEN - 0016
Branding Project
Descnptlon
ThIS project Implements the new CIty logo and slogan brand wIth
the installation of streetlight banners retrofit street signs along
major corndors traffic sIgnal slgnage burldlng and park slgnage
and monument slgnage One time costs for branding City vehIcles
"
and vessels uniforms and other replacement costs are Inc/uded
"
I
CItywIde 'I
!I
Location
Actual 10 II
FundIng Source Dale 200612007 200712008 200812009 200912010 201012011 Total
General Fund 100 $102 500 $71 500 $69000 I $243 000
II
"
(
-
II
I'
Total Project Cost $102500 $71 500 $69 000 I $243 000
Actual 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 Total
DesIgn
Env Penmt
R/IN
Admin $102500 $71 500 $69 000 $243 000
ConstructJon Cost
Conbngency
()
ACENDA ITEM NO
PAGE "4
1
OF 1'f1_
"'" I I 'I
o 75 150 300 Feet
.
City Of Lake EIsmore
r'\ 130 S MaIO Sf
\ ElsInore CA 92530
'- (951)674-3124
www lake-elslnore org
PROJECT AREA
ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION & COMMUNITY CENTER
PROJECT 10 NUMBER GEN-0017
PROJECT NUMBER
4-
-By
.---....
..... ....
-........
-.,..".....
QlyolLMe fJsInQre GJS
--
PACE ~5 OF \~L
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptron
u
Project 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
GEN - 0017
Rosetta Canyon Fire Station & CommuOlty Center
Oescnptlon
This project Includes the design and construction of a 7 700 sf fire
station and the design only of a 15 500 sf commuOlty center In the
Rosetta Canyon development (not construction of commuOlty
center)
Location
Rosetta Canyon Park site close to State Hwy 74 and Rosetta
Canyon Dr
Actual to
Fundlna Source Date 2006/2007 2007/2008 200812009 200912010 201012011 Total
General Fund 100 1,478000 1 478000
Countv Conlnbubon 700 000 700 oor J
FIre FllCIlllv Fee 526 000 974000 1 500 00
I"'"
Total Pl'l)ject Cost 2,704000 974001 3 678 000
Actual 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 Total
DesIgn 174 000 174000
Env Permit
RIW
Admm 30 000 31 000 61 000
Cons1rucllon Cost 2 500 000 645 000 3 145 000
ConllnllenCY 298 000 298 000
u
AQENDA ITEM NO
PACE '\ b
7 _
OF \'~ll
( \
\ ~
l \'
\ )
! \
.. '-'no
(
.
+
CrIy 0Il.ake Elsmore
130 S Main Sl
lake Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
WNW lake-eIstnore org
CIVIC CENTER FEASIBILITY STUDY
PROJECT 10 NUMBER GEN-00018
PROJECT NUMBER
-...
---
--
--
-""""-
Clyflf.....SIbIDn GIS
--
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE '\1. OF
l
'~l
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
u
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
GEN 0018
CIVIC Center Feasibility Study
Descnptlon
This project will evaluate the eXisting and future needs for a CIVIC
Center site There will be several Issues to consider Including
location layout conceptual CIVIC Center buildings Including City
Hall Post Office Library etc I
Location
As directed
Actual to I
Funding Source Date 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 Total
Facdrty Impact Fee 125 000 , 125 000
116
I
II
(
I \.
Total Project Cost 125 000 125 000
Actual 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 Total
Feasibility Study 125000 125 000
DeSign
Env Permrt
RNJ
Admin
Construcbon Cost
Conbngency
"
AGENDA ITEM NO
PACE ~ '1
U
'1
OF -.J1."L
FIve Year CaPItal Improvement Projects LIsting 2006/2007 through 2010/2011
(',ramage Projects
:_JDNo I_No 1-- J_T~
1-.001 I !-"""T~""'_Im_ 3' 65.000)
Total Lake and Aquabc Resource ProJects/ $ 65,000 1
n
(I
AGENDA ITEM NO
PACE " '\
(
OF ---.!1 L
I
~
I
,
I 1
I I I
~-
~ I
--I
___ ___J 4
I
1
I
L___I
j--
I
I
.
-+
CIty 01 Lake EI.more
1305 MainS\.
Lake Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
wwwJate-elslnore org
ARROYO DEL TORRO DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT ID NUMBER DRN.oocl1
PROJECT NUMBER
_Or
t.- Ss/IIOH GS
--
--
-"-"'"
Cll)l'oIUh~GtS
............,
ACiENDA ITE
PACE \00 01' ~1.
n
(\
n
CIty of lake Elsinore
2006-2011 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnpbon
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
ORN - 0002
Arroyo DeIT orro Drainage Improvement
Description
Contnbute City s share of the master planned storm draIn system
from the Arroyo Del Torro Channel near 115 extending beyond the
cemetery extending to the outflow channel near RIverside Df/ve
and Collier Avenue This IS a RIverside County Flood Control
ProJet
Location
From 1-15 behind the cemetery to Colher Avenue extending to the
outflow channel
Actual to
FundIng Source Date 200612007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 Tolal
Dra.n 211 $65 000 $65 000
T olal Project Cost $65 000 $65 000
Actual 06/07 07/08 08109 09/10 10/11 Total
DesIgn
Env PermIt
RNV
AdmIn
Construcbon Cost $65 000 $65 000
Conbngency
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE \O~
1
OFM
Ten Year Capital Improvement Projects LIsting 2006/2007 through 2015/2016
UNFUNDED Lake and Aquabc Resource Projects
I Project ID No IProJect No IProJect Title
u
U U<E-QOO1 Elm Grove Beach Rehabilitation I $ 1 560.000
U LKE 0002 Uodate Lake Elsinore Lake Master Plan $ 150.000
U U<E-0003 Reoafr Back IlaSJn Wetlands Earthen Berms 1$ 70.000
U U<E-Q004 Slone Reoafr on the Levee 1$ 41.000
U U<E-0005 Dredoe Inlet Channel $ 4 375.000
U U<E-0016 Lake Deoartment Headquarters & MaIntenance Yard $ 150.000
IEstimated Total ,
Total Lake and Aquabc Resource ProJectsl $ 6,346,000 ,
u
u
ACENDA J~M r..rO
,. L I()~
l
_\~l_
. . .. . I . . . I
o 245 490 960 -Feet
.
Cdy Of lalle ElsInore
~ 1308 Matn8t
r '! EIsIl'lOre CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
wwwlake-.elslOOreOlg
l,a/q< RIs!hore
BEACH REHABILITATION
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U LKE-GOO1
PROJECT NUMBER
4-
-fir
...._GIS
.....,....
--
_"-GIS
CITJy"'Lata~GrS
-.....
ACENDA ITEM NO 1
PACE~ ,..,- "n
- -
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Oescnptlon
,
,
u
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
U lKE - 0001
I'
"
I
Beach Rehabllltabon
Oescnptlon
Rehabilitate Elm Grove Beach including parking street storm
drain landscape and park-amenmes
Location
Elm Grove Beach
Actual to
Fundlna Source Dale 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Tolal
Intenm $60 000 $60 000
Improvement I
ProJect
Ulbmate Des.gn $150 000 $150 000
Ulbmate Const $1 350 000 $1 350 000
U
T olal Project Cost $60 000 $1 500 000 $1 560 000 I
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
DeSign $5 000 $150000 $150000
Env Permit $300 000 $300 000
RIW
Admin $1 500 $25 000 $26 500
Construcbon Cost $48 500 $1 000 000 $1048500
Conbngency $5000 $175000 $180000
u
AGEl'IDA ITI::'A NO
PACE \)"\ OF
1
\n
o
1000 2000
.
Cdy Of Lake Elstnore
130S MaInS!
('l Elsinore CA 92530
'- (951) 674-312.
www Iake-e!sanore 0Ig
4 000 Feet
+
MASTER PLAN UPDATE
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U LKE 0002
PROJECT NUMBER
-""
Clt)'oIu.w~GI
-....
--
_....GIS
ar~UD.s.n- GIS
--
ACiE,~DA ITEM NO
PACE \OS OF In
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capttallmprovement Program
Project DescnptJon
II
II
II
I
II
u
PrOject ID No U lKE - 0002
Project Number
Project Type Master Plan Update
DescrIPtion Update lake Elsinore Master Plan
location lake Wide
Actual to
FundIng Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$150 000 I $150 000
,
II
II
,
I
'[ I
Total Prolect Cost $150 000 $150 OOO{
~
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Design
Env Permit
RIW
Admm $150 000 $150000
Construcbon Cost
Conbngency
U
1
hGENOA ITEM NO \~l.
PAGE \ 01:> OF
~
~
\ ,
"1
,
"
<>
,~
v~
f,aM Elsmore
,
)"
I
,
;'
t
~
')\
i ;!
"
"
~
;
,
I. . I I' 'I
o 500 1 000 2,000 Feet
.
+
BACK BASIN REPAIR
CJty Of lake Elsinore
130 S MaIn Sl
ke ElsInore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www lake-elsulore Ofg
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U LKE-0003
PROJECT NUMBER
_1Ir
__GIS
--
....-
_""""",GIS
Qyot.....~GIS
---
AGENDA ITEM NO 1 [(
PACE \0 L"" --.-l 'b
II
II
II
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnpt,on
()
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
U lKE - 0003
Back BaSin Repair
Descnpt/on
RepaIr Back Basin Wetlands Earthen Berms
Location
Back basin
Actual to "-
Funding Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$70000 $70 000
Total ProjeCt Cost $70 000 $70 000 r
-'"
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Design $2 000 $2 000
Env PermJl $5 000 $5 000
R/W
Admin $2 000 $2 000
Construcbon Cost $55 000 $55 000
Conbngency $6 000 $6000
()
ACE~DA ITEM NO 1
PACE IO~ OF \1>1
Loh E/sl1w:re
, . I I I ..
o 500 1 000
2,000 Feet
.
SLOPE REPAIR ON THE LEVEE
PROJECT ID NUMBER U LKE-0004
PROJECT NUMBER
+
City Of lake Elsinore
130 S Main Sl
lke EIstnore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www lake-elsonore org
-"'"
....-=
-....
--
-,,-=
Ql)ofO/4leEbintJrw GIS
--
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE 10'\ OF \~l.
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
u
PrOject 10 No U LKE - 0004
Project Number
Project Type Slope Repair on the Levee
Description Repair back basin levee slope
Locabon Back basIn levee
Actual to
Funding Source Date 2011/2012 2012/2013 201312014 2014/2015 2015/2016 Tolal
$41 000 $41 000
,
Total Project Cost $ $41000 $41 000
/
Actual 11112 12/13 13/14 14115 15116 Total~
DeSign $1 000 $1 000
Env Permit $5 000 $5 000
R/W
Admin $2 000 $2 000
ConstructJon Cost $30 000 $30 000
Contingency $3 000 $3 000
()
AGENDA ITEM NO ]
PACE 1\0 OF \1>1-
.
DREDGE INLET CHANNEL
PROJECT ID NUMBER U LKE-6005
PROJECT NUMBER
-+
Cfly Of Lake ElsJnore
130 S Main Sl
ke Elsmore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www Iake-elslOOf8 erg
-""
...--....
--
--
-..........
CCyol~SM.- GJ$
--
AGENDA ITEM NO
PAGE tI \_ OF \~,
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
u
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
U LKE 0005
Dredge Inlet Channel
Description
Remove Silt bUild up from storm run-off from the Inlet channel to
reestablish umform depth
Location
Inlet Channel
Actual 10
FundIng Source Dale 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Tolal
$4 375 000 $4 375 000
.---....
/ "-
Total.pro~ Cost "I ~ 375 000 $4 375 O~
\ / -
Actu~ 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Design $150000 $150000
Env Permit $300 000 $300 000
RIW
Admin $15000 $15000
Construcbon Cost $3 600 000 $3 600 000
Conbngency $310000 $310000
t )0/ cJV 0
3ou/ DUO
10000
') I (P 001 (J 0 0
u
AGENDA ITEM NO
PACE ,,~ OF
1
\'1>\
PROJECT AREA
Lalre Etsmote
I ".' I. I I
o
350 700
1400Feet
.
LAKE DEPARTMENT HEADQUARTERS & MAINTENANCE YARD
+
City Of lake Elsinore
130 S MaIO Sl
~e Elsmore CA 92530
( \(951)674-312'
NW Iake-etslOore otQ
PROJECT ID NUMBER U LKE-GOO6
PROJECT NUMBER
-....
'-_GIS
--
....-.
-......."'"
Cllyotl.llh~GfS
--
AvEtW" ITEM ~.o 1
PAGC1J~_oF \ 'b"'\
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
(j
Project ID No
Project Number
Project Type
U LKE-0006
DescrIPtion
Lake Department Headquarters & Maintenance Yard
EstablIsh permanent Lake Department Headquarters & MaIntenance Yard to
coincIde with LERA Campground and Boat Launch Improvements
Location
lERA Campground
Actual to
FWldmg Source Date 2011/2012 201212013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 Total
General Fund #100 $50 000 $50 000
Pyramid Enllake
Agreement #221 $50 000 $50 000 $100 000
Total Project Cost $50 000 $100000 $150 000
~
Actual 11112 12/13 13/14 14/15 15116 Tolal
Design $25 000 $25000
Env Perrmt $5 000 $5 000
RNoI 0 0
Admin $3 000 $3 000
Construcbon 0 $100000 $100000
Conbngency $17000 $17000
()
ACErJDA ITEfl tJO
PAGE \ \ 'I; OF
1
\lb ""\
Ten Year CapItal Improvement Project L.stIRg 2006/2007 through 2015/2016
{1
UNFUNDED Park and Recreabon Cap.tal Projects
lEsbmated Total]
955 000
550 000
10 000
50 000
200 000
500 000
255000
355 000
1 000 000
100 000
Total Park and Recreabon CaPital ProJect5U 3,975,000]
(\
(\
ACt:liDA n m r.o
PACE \IS
1
OF \'1> 1
.
+
CITY PARK EXPANSION
Ctly Of Lake Elsinore
1308 MelnSl
lake Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
wwwlake-elslllOfeorg
PROJECT ID NUMBER U PRK 0001
PROJECT NUMBER
...._Or
La"~GIS
-.-
=-"-'YGlS( \
C#yolUlr ~~
SW'-PI_IUdn
H,,:'~lJr, 'T- t"O
PACE \\ b
l
OF \~l
()
('"
('I
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
U PRK - 0001
City Park expansion
Description
Expand City Park
Location
Library Street and Main Street
Actual 10
FundIng Source Dale 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$955 000 $955 000
Total Prolect Cost $955 000 $955 000
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Design $50 000 $50 000
Env Permit $5 000 $5 000
RfIN $5 000 $5 000
Admin $25 000 $25 000
Construcbon Cost $800 000 $800 000
Conbngency $70 000 $70 000
ACENDA 'TEM NO----1-
PACE-1!..:LOF In
Lake Elsmore
o 110 22D
, , , I' 'I
... Feet
.
Crty Of Lake Elsinore
1308 MamSl
lake Elsmore CA 92530
(951) 674 3124
www 1ake-eIsUlOre org
4-
OUTLET CHANNEL PHASE 1
PROJECT ID NUMBER U PRK-G002
PROJECT NUMBER
-By
... ."..... GIS
"""-
-.....-
_""""",GIS
CJryolLaleElsinoreGl
-~
ACEtlDA !TElA lJO
PACE_"1>_OF \"bl
('\
(""'\
(\
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project DeSCription
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
U PRK 0002
Outlet Channel Phase I
OescnptJon
Construct multi-use trail along the outflow channel between
lakeshore Drive and limited Avenue
Location
lakeshore Dnve and limited Avenue at the entrance to the outflow
channel
ActuaJlo
Funding Source Dale 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 201412015 2015/2016 Total
$550 000 $550 000
Total Project Cost $550 000 $550 000
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Design $45 000 $45 000
Env Permit $5 000 $5 000
RIW
Admin $15000 $15000
ConstructJon Cost $450 000 $450 000
Conbngency $35 000 $35 000
1
ACEtlDA ITErA NO
PAGE \ \'\ OF \'1>1
o 50 100
.
COMMUNITY CENTER IMPROVEMENTS
+
Crty Of Lake Elsinore
1308 MamSl
lake EIsmore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www lak&-elsmore org
PROJECT ID NUMBER U PRK-G004
PROJECT NUMBER
-....
...-...
--
-.........
---...
Cll)'oILtrle~6IS
--
AOENDA ITEM NO
PAC;E_\d~OF In
(\
(';
(\
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
U PRK - 0004
Community Center Improvements
Oescnptlon
exIsting extenor doors have detenorated due to age and weather
thIs project will Install new extenor doors
I
I
locatron
Commumty Center
Acluallo
Fund.ng Source Dale 2011/2012 201212013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 Tolal
$10 000 I $10000
Total Project Cost $10000 $10 000
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Des.gn
Env Perm.t
RIW
Admin $1 500 $1 500
Construcbon Cost $8 500 $8 500
Contmgency
AGENDA ITEM NO
PAGE \';l \, OF
1
\'?Il
Lakepolnt
Park
Lake Elnore
A ,-"
v Cj'-"
. 3
, , J
",
i
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
o
1 020 Fee1
/
/
.
+
CIty Of Lake Elsmore
130 S Main 51
lake EIsInote CA 92530
(951) 674-312'
www lake-elsmore org
STRENGTHEN LAKEPOINT PARK JETTY WALL
PROJECT ID NUMBER U PRK-llO05
PROJECT NUMBER
-""
.... ..........
--
---
-.........
Qlyflf (Me s.rr.w. QIS
--
ACENDA IiE...l t.o
PACE I~')...) OF \'b1
('\
(1
('\
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 CapRal Improvement Program
I
Project Description
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
U PRK - 0005
Strengthen Lakepolnt Park Jetty Wall
Description
The eXISting Jetty wall reqUIres strengthening and the eXIsting np-
rap needs to be grouted Into place for stability
Location
Along Inflow channel adjacent to Lakepolnt Park
Actual to
Funding Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$50000 $50 000
Total Project Cost $50 000 $50 000
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Design $2 000 $2 000
Env Permrt $5 000 $5 000
RNV
Admin $2 000 $2 000
Construcbon Cost $37 000 $37 000
Conbngency $4000 $4 000
AGENDA ITEM NO
PAGE )~) OF
1
\1.1
mmmmlll
111111I111111 fTI
y
<'~
v ,
, ,
,., 'jr' ,,;-t'-- (: if "1-
,
!
1040F et
.:r
~
I
/
/
/
!
I
/
/
o
.
+
LAKEPOINT PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
City Of lal<.e ElsInore
130 S Mam Sl
lake Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 6743124
www lake-etsmore org
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U PRK-G006
PROJECT NUMBER
-By
............ GIS
-....
--
_,,-GIS
Cllyot.... El$I-. GIS
--
,
AGENDA ITEM hO
PA()E~~Of \~\
('.
('.
('.
City of lake Elsrnore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnpbon
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
U PRK - 0006
lakepornt Park Playground EqUipment Replacement
Description
The eXisting playground eqUipment IS old and needs to be replaced
with new eqUipment
Location
lakepolnt Park
Acluallo
FUnd,ng Source Dale 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Tolal
$200 000 $200 000
Total Project Cost $200 000 $200 000
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Design $25 000 $25 000
Env Perrml $5 000 $5 000
RIW
Adm,n $5 000 $5 000
Construcbon Cost $155000 $155000
Conbngency $10000 $10000
AGENDA ITEM NO {
PAGE I~~ OF \'61..
.
+
MACHADO PARK RESTROOM REPLACEMENT
City Of lake ElsJnore
130 S Main SI
lake Elsmore CA 92530
(951) 674-312'
wwwlake-eJslllOl'e 01"9
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U PRK-GO08
PROJECT NUMBER
-II}<
"'_GIS
::::.::... U
__GIS
Qlyol.t.b~
--
AGENDA ITEM NO
PACiE \~ 6 OF
1
In
{\
{\
{\
-'r
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
I
Project Descnptlon
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
U PRK - 0008
Machado Park Restroom Replacement
Description
Construct new restroom faCIlity to replace the old restroom building
Machado Park
Location
Actual to
Funding Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$500 000 $500 000
Total Project Cost $500 000 $500 000
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Design $45 000 $45 000
Env Permit $5 000 $5 000
RIW
AdmIn $20 000 $20 000
Construclton Cost $400 000 $400 000
Conbngency $30 000 $30 000
AGENDA ITEM NO
PACE \~'l OF
r
\'b\.
Lake E/,ote
/
/
/
I
I
/
/
/
I
/
/
I
/
/
I
o 260 520
1 040 Feel
.
+
City Of Lake Elsmore
130$ MalnSI
CA 92530
lake (~~6~4-3124
www lake-elsino e org
G LOT PAVING
K PARKIN
LAKEPOINT PAR R U PRK-G009
NUMBE
PROJECETd~ NUMBER
PROJ
-...."'"
--
......- (\
........... GIS
RJnnIde~Q'weI
ClrydUb .-dP
--
AGENDA ITEM N~ \~l
PAGE , a'b OF
(\
(\
(\
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Caprtallmprovement Program
Project Descnptlon
PrOject JD No
Project Number
Project Type
U PRK - 0009
lakepolnt Park Parking lot Paving
Descnptlon
Pave the eXisting gravel parking lot at lake POint Park
location
lakepOlnt Park
Actual to
Funding Source Date 2011/2012 2012/2013 201312014 2014/2015 2015/2016 Total
$255 000 $255 000
TOlal,ProJect Cost $ $255 000 $255 000
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Design $10000 $10000
Env Permit $5 000 $5 000
RIW
Adrrun $8 000 $8 000
Construcbon Cost $220 000 $220 000
Conbngency $12 000 $12000
AGENDA ITEM NO ~
PACE ld. \:IF \'b 1
u
.
+
COLLIER AVENUE MEDIAN LANDSCAPING
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U PRK-G010
PROJECT NUMBER
-By
u,. SIIncn GIS
....,....
-- (\
__""""",GIS
c.yo#lAIW~~
-......
Cdy Of Lake ElsInore
130 S Matn Sl
Lake ElsInore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
wwwJake-etsmore org
AGENDA ITEM NO
PAGE \ -;'0 OF \'61
(\
(1
(\
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Caprtallmprovement Program
Project Descnptlon
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
U PRK-0010
Collier Avenue Median Landscaping
Description
Install landscaping and Irngabon In the medians along Colher
Avenue
Location
Colher Avenue between Nichols Road and Riverside Dnve
,
Actual to
Funlfll19 Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$355 000 $355000
Total Project Cost $355 000 $355000
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Design $25 000 $25 000
Env Pennrt $5 000 $5 000
RNV
Admin $13000 $13000
Conslrucbon Cost $285 000 $285 000
Conbngency $27 000 $27 000
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE I~\
1
OF \ 'b '"\
laM Elsinore
I I . I
I . I . I 960 Feel
o 240 480
.
City Of lake EIsmore
1305 Mom St
Lake ElsJnore CA 92530
(951) 67"-312_
wwwJake-e1s1nore OlD
+
GENERAL PARK IMPROVEMENTS
U PRK-0011
PROJECT 10 NUMBER
PROJECT NUMBER
_lIT
--=
--
-.......
,..,.,. c....,. GIS (
CllyotUte~GIS
...--
AGENDA ITEM rm ~
PAGE \3~ OF
(1
(1
(\
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
I
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
U PRK 0011
General Park Improvements
DescrIPtion
General Improvements at SWick-Matich Park
Location
SWick-Matich at limited Avenue and Poe Street
I
Actual to
FundIng Source Date 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 201512016 Total
$1000000 $1 000 000
Total PrOject Cost $1000 000 $1000000
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 T olal
DeSIgn $60 000 $60 000
Env Perrmt $5 000 $5 000
RIW
AdmIn $30 000 $30 000
Construction Cost $630 000 $830 000
Conbngency $75 000 $75 000
AGENDA ITEM NO ~
PACe \~31 OF In
u
u
.
+
EMPLOYEE FACILITY EXPANSION
CIty Of Lake Elsmore
130 S Mam 8t
Lake Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-312.
www lake-elsinore OIl}
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U PRK..o012
PROJECT NUMBER
-...
.......-. "'"
""",-
.....-...
"""""""""""'(j
c-..oILMeBslnOl'e
-.....
ACiENDA ITEM NO 1
PACiE \3 ~ OF \1:>\
n
n
n
,I
CIty of Lake ElsInore
2006-2016 Caprtallmprovement Program
I
Project Descnpbon
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
U PRK - 0012
Employee Facility ExpansIon
Description
Expand the eXlsbng Inadequate faCility for field employees
location
City Yard Building on Langstaff
I
Actual to
FundIng Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$100000 $100 000
Total Project Cost $100 000 $100 000
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
DeslQn $7 000 $7 000
Env Permit
RIW
Admin $3 000 $3 000
Conslrucbon Cost $85 000 $85 000
Conbngency $5 000 $5 000
ACENDAITEM NO ~
PACE- I3S OF \'b \
Ten Year Capital Improvement ProJects Llstang 2006/2007 through 2015/2016
UNFUNDED Street Maantenance Capital ProJects
I Project Title
u
I Project ID No
!Estlmated Total I
U STR 0001 lakeshore Dnve Wldenlnn and Street lIohbno $ 4 218 000
U STR 0002 Dexter Avenue Road Reoalr 490 000
U STR 0003 Camino Del Norte Street Connecbon 5230,000
U STR-D004 Graham Avenue Reconstrucbon 310,000
U STR 0005 Ellis Street Reconstrucbon $ 205.000
U STR-D006 Nichols Road Imarovements $ 1 200 000
U STR-DOO7 Reid Street Imnrovements $ 634.000
U STR 0008 Fraser Dnve Roadwav Reconstrucbon 285.000
U STR 0009 Gunder Avenue Roadwalfeonstrucbon i 634 000
U STR-D010 Gunnerson Street Roadwav Reconstrucbon 1.385,000
U STR-DOll Oakvlew Way/Beechwood lane Street Reoalr and Dralnaae Ima $ 374,000
U STR-D012 larson Road Overlav $ 289.500
U STR 0013 Frank/In Street Overlav 925.000
U STR-D014 Grand Avenue Overlav 1 125.000
U STR 0015 lakeshore Dnve Overlay 1 485 000
U STR-D016 Dralnane Imorovements at limited Avenue and Sannn Street SO 000
Total Street Maintenance Capital ProJects I $ 18,839,500 I
u
u
ACENDA ITEM riD 1
PACE \")6 OF \'b\
, I I I I I I
o 300 600
.
City Of lake Elsinore
130 S MaIO St
\(e Elsmore CA 92530
(951) 674 3124
www Iak.e-elsinore org
PROJECT AREA
Lake Elsmore
t.200F et
+
LAKESHORE DRIVE WIDENING AND STREET LIGHTING
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U STR-0001
PROJECT NUMBER
-'"
.............
--
--
--...
OIyol......~GIS
-.....
ACENDA ITEM foO
PACE \1.? l OF
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
()
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
U STR - 0001
Lakeshore Dove Widemng and Street Lighting
Descnptlon
Widen Lakeshore Dnve to provIde a raised median Island with
landscaping and place the histone street lights along the alignment
Location
Lakeshore Dnve - Mohr Street to Iowa Street
Actual to
FUndlllD Source Date 201112012 2012/2013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$618000 $2000000 $1 600 000 $1 600 000
I \
Total Project Cost 1&1 X OUO ? ~oo 000 I L.Oo dW $4 2180.. .J
-, f I ,
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Design $128000 $128000
Env Pennrt $300000 $300 000
RNV $2 000 000 $2 000 000
AdmIn $30 000 $30 000
Construcbon Cost $1600 000 $1 600 000
Contingency $160000 $160000
()
AGENDA ITEM NO 1
PAGE I)~ OF If>"\
.
DEXTER AVENUE ROAD REPAIR
CIty Of lake ElsInore
lJOS MalnSt
lake Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-312_
www lake-elsinore org
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U STR-0002
PROJECT NUMBER
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE~?'\ JF
+
-""
__GIS
-""
--
-.......""
aryolL.a~GfS
--.
1
\"b"\
City of Lake ElsInore
2006-2016 CapItal Improvement Program
Project Description
u
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
U STR - 0002
Dexter Avenue Road Repair
Descnptlon
Reconstruct the Dexter Avenue Roadway between 2nd Street and
3m Street including drainage Improvements and some minor vertical
realignment
Dexter Avenue - 2nd Street to 3m Street
Location
Actual to
Fund",!! Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$120000 $370000 $490 000
f
"
Total Project Cost /70,C/VO ;7"',010<) $490 000
,
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Tolal
Design $45 000 $45 000
Env Permit $5000 $5 000
Rm
Ad,",n $35 000 $35 000
Construcbon Cost $370 000 $370 000
Conbngency $35 000 $35 000
u
ACENDA ITEM NO _ 1
PACE_ , 4~ IF \'61-
.A. I I I I
~~x~y~~
,,~~
'~~ ~,
~ VL PROJECT AREA !Ill I "
~ Loke Elsmore ~ \ "
(J - I----- ~ I
~~
~
Yc
~~~ \\
~ -
0:
~!~~I~~ II w
'"
~
't:c"l /; \ s ~ =
'1fitDi fJ WJ!J!~ ~
~ ~- ~'::!k ediL If-nrr ~ y
1Dh. ~ iI "'" r. cCJ S~ ~~ ~~
,/:2DJi H=~ ~ H ~ \~
!-/t ,;:t 1ftr\\'\.--11 ,,'- "-
. +
CAMINO DEL NORTE ROADWAY CONNECTION
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U STR 0003 -By
crty Of Lake Elsinore PROJECT NUMBER ...._=
130 S MaIO Sl ....,-
....-
Lake Elsinore CA 92530 ~Coun(rGlS
(951) 674-3124 aryclLAlfa'~GI$
www Iake--el$lOOr org -~
~CENDA IT::M r.O -,
PAGE ,\., \ OF \'bl
CIty of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnpbon
(j
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
U STR - 0003
Camino Del Norte Roadway Connection
Description
Construct roadway connection between Main Street and the
Frank"n Street Bndge to provide an alternate route to 1-15
Location
Camino Del Norte - Main Street to Frank"n Street
1.. 2-)ll tID 0
/ -) )
Actual to 2012f2o;3
Fundmg Source Date 201112012 201312014 2014/2015 201512016 Total
CamIno Del Norte $2 980 000 ..;,:(~ $5 230 000
TIF Suppllment
(
/' ~ ~
Total ProJect Cost $ $2 980 000 r $2 250 OOIY $5,230 000
,
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Design $280 000 $280 000
Env Perrmt $300 000 $300 000
RfIN $2 000000 $2 000 000
Admin $200 000 $200 000
Constructon Cost $2,250 000 $2 250 000
Contingency $200 000 $200 000
()
ACENDA ITEM NO 1
PACE ,~~ OF \'bl.
.
+
GRAHAM AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION
COy Of Lake 8511l0'"
130 S MaIn Sl
t.ake Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
WNW IakEHtlsanore org
PROJECT ID NUMBER U STR-0004
PROJECT NUMBER
-By
...........GIS
--
-........
_........GIS
CJryolLllt~GfS
--'
AGENDA ITEM NO
PAGE 1~3 OF \'ill.
City of Lake Elsinore
20062016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnpbon
(j
Project ID No
Project Number
Project Type
U STR - 0004
Graham Avenue Reconstruction
Descnptlon
Reconstruct the Graham Avenue Roadway between Main Street
and Chestnut Street Including Curb and Gutter
Location
Graham Avenue - Mam Street to Chestnut Street
Actual to
FundIng Source Date 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 Total
$60000 $250 000 $310000
/
Total Project Cost $ $60 000 $250 000 $310 OOl
Actual 11/12 12113 13114 14/15 15/16 Total
DeSIgn $20 000 $20 000
Env Permit $5 000 $5 000
RNI
Admin $10000 $10000
ConstnuctJon Cost $250 000 $250 000
Contingency $25 000 $25 000
()
AGENDA ITEM NO~
p.P,CE_ ~ F \'b l
.
+
ELLIS STREET RECONSTRUCTION
City Of Lake ElsInore
130 S Mam $t
Lake Elstnore CA 92530
(951) 674-312'
wwwlake-elsmore org
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U STR-0005
PROJECT NUMBER
-..-
_..-.ms
-,-
....s_
-""'-"'"
CilyofUl~GtS
...-......
AGENDA ITEM ",0 7
PAGE 145" OF '~l.
CIty of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project OescnptJon
o
ProJect 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
U STR - 0005
Ellis Street ReconstructIon
Oescnptron
Reconstruct the EllIs Street Roadway between Heald Avenue and
Flint Street Including Curb and Gutter
Location
EllIS Street - Heald Avenue to Flint Street
Actual 10
FundIng Source Dale 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$205 000 $205 000
T olal Project Cost $205 000 $205 oor \
'--~
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Tolal
Design $15000 $15000
Env Pennll $5 000 $5000
RIW
AdmIn $10000 $10000
Construcbon Cost $160 000 $160 000
Conbngency $15000 $15000
U
ACENDA ITEM hO 1
PACE \ 4: ~ OF , 'I.l
)
t-
I
~ ''';''410'' '~F~
.
+
NICHOLS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
Crt)' Of lake Elsmore
1308 MaIllSl
ake Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www lake-elsmore org
PROJECT ID NUMBER U STR-GOO6
PROJECT NUMBER
-By
....-........
.....-
.............
-""'-"'"
CMyol....ElslntweGlS
--
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE_14 i_OF ''ill
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Description
u
Project 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
U STR - 0006
Nichols Road Improvements
Description
Construct a two lane roadway WIth intersection enhancements for
left tum pockets Roadway shall Include two 12-foot lanes and a 5-
foot graded shoulder on each side
LocatIon
Nichols Road -1-15 to EI Toro Road
Actual to
FundIng Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$430 000 $770000 $1200000
I I
-
Total Project Cost $430000 $770 000 $1 200 000
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
DesIgn $100000 $100 000
Env Perml! $300 000 $300 000
Rm
Adrrnn $30 000 $30000
Construcbon Cost $700 000 $700 000
Conbngency $70 000 $70 000
()
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE \~~ OF
"1
,n
, ,S7 V 2- ~w\~
I/~ 1- J~ \
~ ~<~/ ~..~ -nf'J ~~ D
'j A ' x.:'. f0) -----' 1------ ~
)~ c J--l-: ~ em ~\\\\ID_ (
) ~-r U- .,\
,J Lake Elsmore ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ),- ~
~ I/i-J ~ (\ ~'J (c-1: ~ \' 1-_
'I ~'~ L'~\W\l'\,\
-' ,~ ,,, \illL~ \lliIDl
------- 'I \ \ \ ~ \ ~ -- 1\ \
@W' ~~~
~ ~ 1~ ~
~m J- \ ~~\\',\~ ~
-1 D-J J- \ ___.--1 \ \ \1"--
~ \ PROJECT AREA V ~ *:-- ~ r;..-1 .-- 'Z(
..J--< 7 \ \ ' '"/\ \ \ \ -. I..------ 'C--- \ "
y j.- t ~ ~ ~ '" /'::\ \
"/ t=f >' \' ~/ rm
t::\~ '~~ N /\ ~ / I I I fTf
. +
REID STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U STR-0007 --""
City Of lake Elsmo e PROJECT NUMBER ....-....
130 S Main St --
--
Lake EIsIf'lOfe CA 92530 -.........
I (951) 674-3124 CltyolUh~GIS
www lake-elslnore org ---
AGENDA ITEM NO 1
PAGE_'lli\' OF '~1.
City ot lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Description
()
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
U STR - 0007
Reid Street Improvements
DescrIPtIon
Construct a two lane roadway Including two 12-toot lanes and a 5-
toot graded shoulder on each side
Location
Reid Street - Strickland Avenue to Dempsey Avenue
Actual to
Funding Source Date 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 201512016 Total
$234 000 $400 000 $634 000
(
Total Project Cost $234 000 $400 000 $634 OO~i
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
DeSign $24 000 $24 000
Env Permit $150000 $150000
Rm
Adm.n $20 000 $20 000
ConstruCbon Cost $400 000 $400 000
Conbngency $40 000 $40 000
()
ACENDA !TErA NO 1 l.
PACE \5 Q OF \"b
.
CIty Of lake Elsmore
130 S Main SI
lake Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674 3124
www take-elsmore org
+
FRASER DRIVE ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT 10 NUMBER. U STR-0008
PROJECT NUMBER
-By-
__GIS
--
....-
_,,-GIS
Cltyo#~~GIS
--
ACENDA ITEM NO l
PACE \5 \ OF I~,
CIty of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Caprtallmprovement Program
Project Descnptlon
u
PrOject 10 No
ProJect Number
Project Type
U STR - 0008
Fraser Dnve Roadway Reconstruction
Oescnptlon
Reconstruct the Fraser Avenue Roadway between Walnut Dnve
and lakeshore Dnve including Curb and Gutter
Location
Fraser Dnve - Walnut Dnve to lakeshore Dnve
Actual to
Fundmg Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$285000 $285 000
Total Project Cost $285 000 $285 Ot
--
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Design $25 000 $25 000
Env Permit $5 000 $5 000
RIW
Adrrnn $15000 $15000
Construcbon Cost $220 000 $220000
Conbngency $20 000 $20 000
u
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE \S'J..
1
OF \'/)1
.
GUNDER AVENUE ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION
City Of lake Elsinore
130 S MaIO Sl
lake Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www Iak&-elslf'lOf8 erg
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U STR.eOO9
PROJECT NUMBER
+
-....
...-...
.....-
....-
-..........
ary 01.... Ebhwwe GIS
--
-,
AGENDA ITE'VI NO
PAGE \52 OF
In
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Caprtallmprovement Program
Project Descnptlon
()
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
U STR - 0009
Gunder Avenue Roadway Construction
Description
Construct a new 26-foot Wide asphalt roadway and 5-foot graded
shoulder on each Side
Location
Gunder Avenue - Ingall Circle to Pike Street
Actual to
Fundang Source Date 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 Total
$234 000 $400 000 $634 000
Total ProleCt Cost $234 000 $400 000 $634 000
{
Actual 11112 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 TotaJ-
DeslQn $24 000 $24 000
Env Permit $150 000 $150000
RNV
Admin $20 000 $20 000
Construcbon Cost $400 000 $400 000
Conbngencv $40000 $40 000
u
AOENDA ITEM NO 1
PACE \54 OF \'1>"\
~
.y
//" X
I. I ~rr
~ PROJECT AREA -.J
~V
v
o
y
I
'" ~
/' ~Elsm"re "& ~\.
"N 7 I-- ~_F\ '1
/J~ ~/ /J.
~ {~^\
~ ~ ~~A' ,~'<LL~
~ ~~ ~)
~~l
~~~ 0' "u,A' n
~ ~R ,,\\ / ~ S\S ~ ::,c
;<.. \~\ 11I1.lh\' ~(\\ ~ _.,., rnf-\lt
( y.~,<:/, ..-1::=:1. ~ J ,~ ---1 \ ill \<<1\
~~ rJ:t:y: ~~ID- \I~ '-.&- · : ~~
~ ~ ~~ lft1 ~~ ;/ (]G1~ ~ ~'
~ ~ - ~~~~. '~~ ~
~~ " ~ 'I/) ~~~ ~~1- I
~ J~ v: ~ '" <;.y<\ _ ~\i
7"< ~.\~\..~ ~ ~
~ 0/711(\\ ~~~\\\L ~~ ~
'~ ~~~ ~IIII r--
;/::t);~U 1.~~~~1~, "or
<:)
~
PROJECT AREA ~
.~
.
-+
CIty Of Lake Elsmo
1305 MalOSL
Lake Elsinore CA 92530
I (951) 674-3124
www lake-elsmore org
GUNNERSON STREET ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT ID NUMBER U STR.o010
PROJECT NUMBER
-...-
....-...
--
--
-...........
Clf)' of LMe s.taan GIS
--
AGENDA ITEM NO 1
fJACE \ 5.s )F ,'n
-~
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project DescnptJon
()
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
U STR-0010
Gunnerson Street Roadway Reconstruction
Descnptlon
Reconstruct Gunnerson Street including minor drainage
Improvements
Location
Gunnerson Avenue - Lakeshore Drive to Riverside Dnve
Acluallo
Funamg Source Dale 2011/2012 2012/2013 201312014 2014/2015 201512016 Total
$265 000 $1120000 $1 385 000
(
Total ProJect Cost $265000 $1120 000 $1 385 00.
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Design $115000 $115000
Env Permit $5 000 $5 000
RIW
AdmIn $35 000 $35 000
Construcbon Cost $1 120000 $1 120000
Conbngency $110000 $110000
()
ACENDA ITEM NO l
PACC~5b _ JF ,1.1
PROJECT AREA
o
250
500
1 000 Feet
.
OAKVIEW WA Y/BEECHWOOD LANE
STREET REPAIR AND DRAINAGE
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U STR-G011
PROJECT NUMBER
+
City Of lake EJsloore
1308 MamSl
lake Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
wwwlake-etsmore erg
-""
.... --. GIS
.....-
--
__GIS
Qlydl.-"e~Gt$
...--
AOENDA ITEM NO ~
PAOE IS, OF \~l
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnpbon
u
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
U STR - 0011
Oakvlew Way/Beechwood lane Street Repair and Drainage
Improvement
Description
Reconstruct Oakvlew Way/Beechwood lane including minor
drainage Improvements
Location
Oakvlew WaylBeechwood lane
Acluallo
FundIng Source Dale 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 Tolal
$374000 $374000
\
Total Project Cost $374000 $374000
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
DesIgn $24 000 $24 000
Env PermIt $5 000 $5 000
RfW
AdmIn $15000 $15000
Construcbon Cost $300 000 $300 000
ContIngency $30 000 $30 000
u
ACENDA ITEM NO 7
PACE~S ~ _ IF \'b 1
PROJECT AREA
o
175
350
700 Feet
.
+
LARSON ROAD OVERLAY
CIty Of Lake Elsonore
130 S MaIO Sl
lake Etstnora. CA 92530
(951) 674-312'
www lake-eJsfnore erg
PROJECT ID NUMBER U STR-G012
PROJECT NUMBER
-By
-_GIS
--
............
_"""""GIS
cayol....EJsinoreGfS
--
ACENDA ITEM NO
PAGE \?li\
1
OF ..J.iL
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
u
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
U STR - 0012
Larson Road Overlay
Description
Replace eXisting pavement and provide new asphalt pavement and
drainage Improvements
Location
Larson Road - Machado Street a distance approximately 1 100-ft
east of Machado Street
Actual to
Funding Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$298 500 $298 500
l
Total Project Cost $298 500 $298 500-
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Design $25 000 $25 000
Env Penmt $5 000 $5 000
RIW $3 500 $3 500
Admin $12000 $12000
ConstruclJon Cost $230 000 $230 000
Conbngency $23 000 $23 000
u
ACENDA ITEM NO 1
PAC~ I' 0 OF \1>1
.
+
Ctty Of lake Elsinore
130 S Mam Sl
Lake Etsanore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www Iake--eJsmore org
FRANKLIN STREET OVERLAY
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U STR-0013
PROJECT NUMBER
-By
...-....
--
--
-.....,...
Cllyt:tl....~GJS
--.
ACENDA ITEM r..o l
PACE Ib( )f ISl
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 CapItal Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
()
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
U STR - 0013
Franklin Street Overlay
Description
Replace eXIsting pavement and provIde new asphalt pavement and
draInage Improvements
Location
Franklin Street - MaIO Street to Avenue 6
Actual 10
Funding Source Dale 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$925000 $925 000
Total Project Cost $925 000 $925000,- ...,
Actual 11/12 12113 13114 14/15 15116 Total
Design $55 000 $55 000
Env Permit $5 000 $5 000
RIW
Admin $25 000 $25 000
Construcl1on Cost $770 000 $770 000
Conbngency $70 000 $70 000
"'''tNDA ITlM fJO
PACE-1 {, ~ OF
U
1
"n.
o
/
/
/
/
500 FeM
.
GRAND AVENUE OVERLAY
+
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U STR-G014
PROJECT NUMBER
CIty Of Lake Elsonore
1308 MamSl
'lke Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www lake-elsrnore org
-By
---...
--
--
-..........
~clUIIe~GIS
-......
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE 163.. IF
City of Lake Elsinore
20062016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Description
()
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
U STR 0014
Grand Avenue Overlay
Oescnpbon
Replace eXisting pavement and provide new asphalt pavement and
traffic striping
Locabon
Grand Avenue - Machado Street to RIVerside Drive
Actual to
Funding Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$1 125 000 $1125000
Total Project Cost $1125 000 $1125C i
--
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Design $80 000 $80 000
Env Permit $5 000 $5 000
R/W
Admin $55 000 $55 000
Construction Cost $895 000 $895 000
Conllngency $90 000 $90 000
()
,....,l;I\IDA ITEM NO
PACE Il.~ IF
1
\'1.1
.
+
LAKESHORE DRIVE OVERLAY
City Of Lake ElsInore
130 S Mam SI
lake Elsmore CA 92530
(951) 674-312'
www lake-elsanore CNg
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U STR 0015
PROJECT NUMBER
-By
.... __GIS
.....,""
...._n
-""""",GIS
CllyclLMe~GIS
-......
AGEND I 1
PACE I/'S 1F \'3
CIty of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
()
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
U STR-0015
lakeshore Dnve Overlay
Descnptlon
Replace eXisting pavement and provide new asphalt pavement and
traffic stnpmg
Location
lakeshore Dnve - Machado Street to Riverside Dnve
Actual to
FundIng Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$160000 $1 320000 $1485000
Total ProjeCt Cost $160000 $1 320 000 $1 485 or \
\..1
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
DeSIgn $85 000 $80 000
Env Permit $5 000 $5 000
R/W
Admin $70 000 $55 000
Construcbon Cost $1 200 000 $895000
Conbngency $120000 $90 000
()
AGENDA ITEr'l NO
PAGE 16~
l
F \'n
(1
(1
(\
City of Lake Elsinore
20062016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Description
PrOject ID No
Project Number
Project Type
U STR - 0016
DraInage Improvements at Limited and Spring
DescrIPtion
Construct drainage Improvements at the corner of Limited
Avenue and Spnng Street to address pondlng Issues at this
location I
Location
Northeast and northwest corner of Limited Avenue and
Spring Street
Actual to
Funding Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$50 000 $50 000
Total Project Cost $50 000 $50 000
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Oes/gn $3 500 $3 500
Env Penmt $1 000 $1 000
R/IN
Admin $1 500 $1 500
ConstruclJon Cost $40 000 $40 000
Conbngency $4 000 $4 000
ACENDA ITEM tJO 1
PAGEJ.U _Of 18 {
Ten Year Capital Improvement Projects Llstmg 2006/2007 through 2015/2016
UNFUNDED Traffic Capital Projects
IProJect 10 No
I Project litle
U
IEstrmated Total I
U TRF-0001 Traffic Signal Installation @ MaIn St & Lakeshore Dr $ 210 000
U TRF-0002 Terra Cotta Road Street Oosure -$ 80,000
U TRF-0003 Traffic Signal Installabon @ MaIO St & Graham Ave ~ 2251-000
U TRF-0004 Traffic SIgnal Installation @ Grand Ave & Macy St $ 240,000
U TRF-0005 Traffic S19nal Installabon @ Grand Ave & RIversIde Dr -$ 250,000
U TRF-0006 Traffic Signal Installation @ Summerhill Dr & La Strada -.l 14Q,000
U TRF-0007 Traffic Signal Installabon @ Spong St & Graham Ave $ 22~000
Total Traffic CapItal proJectsL $ 1,370,000 I
u
AGENDA ITEM NO
PACE l~~
u
(
')f '"31
Lake Elsmore
, I I . I
o 125 ;250
.
CIty Of Lake Els....ore
1308 MaInSt
lake Elslnore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
WNW lake-emnore org
.~F~/
!
Lakepoont
Park
+
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U TRF.oOO1
PROJECT NUMBER
-"'"
.....au-.GIS
-.-
--
-"""""'...
atyoluteeu-.GlS
...---
ACENDA IT
PAGE \b"\ OF \'&\
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Caprtallmprovement Program
Project Descnptlon
(j
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
U TRF - 0001
Traffic SlgnallnstallatJon
DescrIPtion
Install a Traffic Signal at the intersection of Main Street and
lakeshore Dnve A traffic signal warrant study has been conducted
and a signal IS warranted at this location
location
Main Street and lakeshore Dnve
Actual to
Fundmg Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$210000 $210000
r
(
Total Project Cost $210000 $210000-
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15116 Total
Design $10000 $20 000
Env Permit $5 000 $5 000
FWJ
Admin $5 000 $5 000
Construcbon Cost $170000 $170000
Conbngency $20 000 $20 000
()
,",vt;NDA ITEM NO
PAGE~OF
'\ ~
\ PROJECT AREA ~ /'
'\."\ -^ L:>J -~ L.:> I
~ ~~
I
^ ~~
~k~E/s'" "L I.-- ~cP.
~ , \.--
- ~ r.: ~ r--
" I--
v e.-
!-- e.-
'-- I-- I
I I-- I
\\~~lll T\'
_~ 111j1
l)?j _
~ -
\
II
III 1/
f--Y" ) 1
~
/
I~\- f--
~f--
I ,,'" MONT AVI
-/""-~
) PROJECT AREA I
4- />
~~
.#
~
IHf
"-l.
'-
A ,.-.
r---:::I'--
r---
r---
-".
-'-
-
"'-
r--- 7a
r---
~~
';
~
./:
R
<0 <
.
~"
~~
:Y^7
~/
.
+
City Of Lake ElsIoore
1305 MalflSt.
lake Elsinore CA 92530
I (951) 674 3124
WNW lake-elstoore org
TERRA COTTA ROAD CLOSURE
PROJECT ID NUMBER U TRF-0002
PROJECT NUMBER
-""
_.......IDS
--
--
__IDS
CllJ'oILales.mcr.GlS
--
ACENDA ITEM NO l
PAOe....\I 1 IF \&1
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
u
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
U TRF - 0002
Terra Cotta Road Street Closure
OescrJPbon
Close Terra Cotta Road at the intersection with lakeshore Dnve to
provide alternative circulation With Improved Sight distance
Locabon
Intersection of Terra Cotta (South) and lakeshore Dnve
AGtualto
Funding Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$60 000 $60 000
(
Total Project Cost $80000 $60000,,-
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Design $10000 $10000
Env Permit $5 000 $5 000
RIW $10000 $10000
Admin $5 000 $5 000
ConstructJon Cost $45 000 $45 000
Conbngency $5 000 I $5 000
u
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE.--:2~ ,)F
1
In
.
-+
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION
City Of Lake Etstnore
130 S Main S1
Lake Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-312'
www Iake--elslllOfe org
PROJECT ID NUMBER U TRF-0003
PROJECT NUMBER
-By
...._=
-,-
--
_CouoOyGlS
c.yflfua.~Q$
--
AGENDA ITEM NO
PACE \ l~_oF
(
'~l
City of Lake Elsrnore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
()
PrOject 10 No U TRF - 0003
Project Number
Project Type Traffic Signal Installation
OescnptJon Install Traffic Signal at MaIO Street and Graham Avenue
Location Intersection of MaIO Street and Graham Avenue
Actual to
FundIng Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$225000 $225 000
Total Project Cost $225 000 $225 oor -
v
Actual 11/12 12113 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
DeSign $25 000 $25 000
Env Permit $5 000 $5 000
RIW
AdmIn $5 000 $5 000
Construclton Cost $170000 $170 000
Conllngency $20 000 $20 000
()
f\vENDA ITEM NO
PACE \l~ 'F
l
V'n
/
/
/
/
~"'" ~"'-" /
, ~ / /
", '--( ~ '"
" "" ;'",-' '/
" Y -.... -.../
Y 'y'
, ,
"'I
/
/
Lake Ets.rwre
/
/
~
"
"
"',
" /
~'./
I
,
,I.
/~
'" """, 'y
, 'y/
"
,
, . I I' . I
o 200 400 800 Feet
.
+
CIty Of lake ElSloore
1308 MaIflSt
Lake EIslflOf'8 CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www take-etsmore org
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION
PROJECT ID NUMBER U TRF-0004
PROJECT NUMBER
-By
...._GIS
....,-
-........
-""'-""
Cll)'oIU11t~GrS
--
,
AGENDA ITEM NO
PACE \ 15
1
1F \ 'l L
City of Lake Elsinore
2006 2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Oescnptlon
u
PrOject 10 No U TRF - 0004
Project Number
Project Type Traffic Signal Installation
DescnptJon Install Traffic Signal at Grand Avenue and Macy Street
Location Intersection of Grand Avenue and Macy Street
Actual to
Fund.na Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$240000 $240 000
T olal Project Cost $240 000 $240 00' I
,"-.J.;
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Design $25 000 $25 000
Env Permit $5 000 $5 000
RIW
Admin $5 000 $5 000
ConstructJon Cost $185000 $185000
ContJngency $20 000 $20 000
AOENDA ITEM NO
PACE \l b
U
1
OF \~1
Lab! Elsrnore
/
/
/
/
,/
~
/
/
/
/_-/
r
'-
"" / /
" / I
'~ //
/~
/~
I "'-
I~ "/
"y
I
'"
I
, I I I I I I
/
'-,
o 200 400 800 Feel
.
+
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION
CIty Of Lake Elsinore
130 S Matn Sl
.ake ElsInore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www 1ake-eJs1OOfe org
PROJECT 10 NUMBER. U TRF-0005
PROJECT NUMBER
,
-....
... ..........
.....-
...........
~c",GIS
Cllyolurr.~Gf$
--
PACE \~l 1F In
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
u
PrOject 10 No U TRF - 0005
Project Number
Project Type Traffic Signal Installation
Oescnptlon Install Traffic Signal at Grand Avenue and Riverside Dnve
Location Intersection of Grand Avenue and Riverside Dnve
Actual to
Fund.ng Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$250 000 $250 000
Total ProteCt Cost $250 000 $250 000 ...,
)(
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 T otal'-'-
Design $25 000 $25 000
Env Permit $5 000 $5 000
R/IN
AdmIn $5 000 $5 000
Construcbon Cost $200 000 $200 000
Conbngency $20 000 $20 000
(
2 5; 00 IQ
ryooo
5 ODO
(
Loo () 0 0
/
20 0'00
/
.
1-)'>(000
U
ACENDA ITEM NO -,
PAOE.JJ1...-.0F \ n
.
+
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U TRF-0006
PROJECT NUMBER
-By
........-. ...
--
....-.
-..........
CMyclLMeBsl-. GIS
--
COy Of lake Elsmore
130 S MaIn 5t
lake Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www lake-etsmore org
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE 11"\ OF \Ib 1
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Cap,tallmprovement Program
Project Description
u
Project 10 No U TRF - 0006
Project Number
Project Type Traffic Signal Installation
Description Install Traffic Signal at Summerhill Dove and la Strada
Location Intersection of Summerhill Drive and la Strada
Actual to
Funding Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$140 000 $140000
/' "
Total Project Cost $140 000 $140 OOf
'- ,.
-----
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Total
Design $25 000 $25 000
Env Permit $5 000 $5 000
RIW
Admin $5 000 $5 000
Construction Cost $185000 $185000
Conbngency $20 000 $20 000
"1-
2 SI 00 0
5"/ 0 0 0
( 5"; 00 0
I B SI 0 00
20~o
c?D(~
'\...
Z )/ 00 0
'5 QUb
I
( r 000
) S-~, 000
2Y) 00 f)
,
'-YO Oc)Q
()
I\~ENDA ITEM NO 1
PACE \~O OF \n
.
+
CIty Of Lake ElsInore
1308 MaIOSl
Lake EIsmore CA 92530
(951) 614-3124
_ IaIuHlIsInore org
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION
PROJECT 10 NUMBER U TRF-GOO7
PROJECT NUMBER
-By
ua.au-.GIS
-.-
--
-,,-GIS
ClI)'oILab~GfS
-....
ACENDA ITEM NO
PACE 1ft 'it
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnptlon
()
Project 10 No U TRF - 0007
Project Number
Project Type Traffic Signal Installation
Description Install Traffic Signal at Spnng Street and Graham Avenue
Location Intersect/on of Spnng Street and Graham Avenue
Actual to
Funding Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$225000 $225 000
Tolal1>roject Cost $225 000 $225 000
( )
Actual 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Tolal__
Design $25 000 $25 000
Env Permit $5 000 $5 000
RIW
AdmIn $5 000 $5 000
Construcbon Cost $170000 $170000
Conbngency $20 000 $20 000
u
I\I.IENDA ITEM NO
PACE I ~ 'l.
1
OF \%1
Ten Year Capital Improvement Projects Listing 2006/2007 through 2015/2016
r,NFUNDED Drainage Projects
IproJect 10 No IproJect No IprojectTltIe
IEstimated Total I
U ORN-0002
U ORN 0003
Mill 5tree Avenue 6 Stann Drain 1m
lIbra Street 0 1m rovements
395 000
75000
Total Lake and Aquabc Resource ProJects I $ 470,000 I
(\
(\
ACENOAITEM NO~
PACE 1 ~)) OF \'&\
rcrllllJ)Jl-'-.....:-~ /1/; . ....,,_.I"J"TIII/~
Fir-
~~
~
.('3 .('3 ~
~
m
-I
t= ~
I--
I--
- 1-lJJJJ 'J
3
I IIII tmtr
,rf!1iffJj I- III'
~ bfi! ~ lI/ffF
LJII~
.1 I -U.JJJ I
f!!; ill I r 7 ~--~-:I
-- h I--- I -.-=:::::, W
,~; l~ ~!L ~~ ;/mw
:--J ~ r f- ~ t1lJiifi
I -- N~ /::::: f--,---, R3 sr-n.'" ~
-=::.::;/-== ~ . h
1/ I 1/ J f:3If:=j~fj I I !t-nL~-j= J--J
PROJECT AREA
IIT"
II
I--
I--
I--
I--
I--
tIT,
r
; I,
/ \
\,,;;1
Ii~
/
--
.
..
City Of Lake Elsinore
130 S Mam Sl
lake Elsll'lore CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
www Iake-e1s1OO e org
MILL STREET/AVENUE 6 STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT ID NUMBER U DRN-GOO2
PROJECT NUMBER
-..-
... ........ GIS
....,-
-....... (\
_"",-GIS
cay"'....Ssl-.Q\. .d
-- --
ACENDA ITEM NO I
PAGE \~4 OF \~l
('
(\
,('
City of lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project DescnptJon
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
U DRN - 0002
Mill StreeVAvenue 6 Storm Drain Improvements
DescnptJon
Construct Improved drainage faCIlity to promote the conveyance of
storm waters through the area
Location
Between Mill Street and Park Way east of Avenue 6
Actual to
Fundmg Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$395 000 $395 000
Total Project Cost $395 000 $395 000
Actual 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 Total
Design $45 000 $45 000
Env Pennlt $5 000 $5 000
RJW
Admin $15000 $15000
Construcllon Cost $300 000 $300 000
Conbngency $30 000 $30 000
173
ACENDAITEM NO~
PACE \1>S OF I'P
.
u
.
+
LIBRARY STREET DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
CIty Of Lake Elsmore
130 S Mam SI
lake Elsinore CA 92530
(951) 674-312'
www lake-elsmore org
PROJECT ID NUMBER U DRN-0003
PROJECT NUMBER
-....
....--=
--
....--.
...... CGuPfy GIS I
ca.,ot....~Gt\ ~
--- -
174
ACENDA ITEM NO (
PACE II) b)f \~l
n
,
-0,
n
City of Lake Elsinore
2006-2016 Capital Improvement Program
Project Descnpbon
PrOject 10 No
Project Number
Project Type
U DRN - 0003
Library Street Drainage Improvement
Descnptlon
Construct drainage Improvements to direct storm water such that It
remaIns within the public nght-of-way
Library Street between Main Street and Spnng Street
Location
Actual to
Fund,nn Source Date 201112012 201212013 201312014 201412015 201512016 Total
$75000 $75 000
Total prOfect Cost $75 000 $75 000
Actual 06107 07108 08109 09/10 10111 Total
Design $15000 $1& 000
Env Permit $5000 $5 000
RIW
Admin $5000 $5 000
Construcbon Cost $45 000 $45 000
Conbngency $5 000 $5000
175
AOENDA ITEM NO _ ('
PAGE l~l OF \n