Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08.15.2006 PC AGENDA CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MICHAEL 0 NEAL CHAIRMAN JOHN GONZALES VICE CHAIRMAN JIMMY FLORES COMMISSIONER AXEL ZANELLI COMMISSIONER PHIL MENDOZA COMMISSIONER ROLFE PREISENDANZ, D1R COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WWW LAKE ELSINORE ORG (951) 614 3124 PHONE (951) 6142392 FAX LAKE ELSINORE CULTURAL CENTER 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 ******************************************************************* TUESDAY, AUGUST 15,2006 6 00 P M If you are attending thIs Planmng CommIssIOn Meeting please park In the Parking Lot across the street from the Cultural Center ThIs wIll assIst us In lImIting the Impact of meetings on the Downtown Business DIStrlct. Thank you for your cooperation' CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON AGENDIZED ITEMS - 3 MINUTES (Please read & complete a Speaker s Form at the podIUm, pnor to the start of the Plannmg COnUTIlSSIOn Meetmg) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (AIl matters on the Consent Calendar are approved m one motIon, unless a ComnussIOner or any members of the public requests separate actIOn on a speCIfic Item) 1 Mmutes a Regular Planmng ComnusslOn MeetIng Mmutes for July 18, 2006 PAGE 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA- August 15, 2006 2 Mmor Des1gn Rev1ew of a Smgle Famlly Res1dence located at 222 North Riley Street (APN 374 162-028) · The apphcant 1S requestmg des1gn reV1ew cons1deratIOn for a convennonally bmlt two-story smgle- farrnly dwellmg umt pursuant to the Histone Elsmore Architectural Design GUldelmes, Chapter 17 82 (Des1gn Rev1ew) Chapter 17 14 (Res1dennal Development Standards), Chapter 1723 (R 1 Smgle-Farrnly Res1dennal D1StrlCt), and Chapter 1766 (Parkmg Reqmrements) of the Lake Elsmore Mun1c1pal Code (LEMC) CASE PLANNER Justm Carlson Assoc1ate Planner Ext 292, jcarson@lake elsmore org RECOMMENDATION Approval 3 Mmor Des1gn Rev1ew of two story smgle farrnly Res1dence located at 17395 Bromley Avenue (APN 378 142-016) . The apphcant 1S requestmg des1gn reV1ew cons1deratIOn for a two story manufactured smgle farrnly res1dennal dwellmg umt to be placed on a vacant lot pursuant to Chapter 1782 (Des1gn Rev1ew), Chapter 17 14 (Res1dennal Des1gn Standards), and Chapter 1766 (Parkmg Reqmrements) of the Lake Elsmore Mumc1pal Code (LEMC) CASE PLANNER Agusnn Resend1z, ASSOCiate Planner Ext 232, aresend1z@lake-elsmore org RECOMMENDATION Connnuance 4 Mmor Des1gn Rev1ew of a Res1dennal Duplex located on the West slde of Riley Street and 370 feet North of Heald Avenue (APN 374-161 011) . The apphcant 1S requestmg des1gn reV1ew cons1deratIOn for a res1dennal duplex The proposed duplex umts w1ll be ava1lable for rent ReV1ew 1S pursuant to the H1stonc Elsmore Arch1tectural Des1gn Gmdelmes Chapter 17 82 (Des1gn Rev1ew) Chapter 17 14 (Res1dennal Development Standards), and Chapter 17 66 (Parkmg Reqmrements) of the Lake Elsmore Mun1c1pal Code (LEMC) CASE PLANNER Matthew CHams Semor Planner Ext 279 mhams@lake-elsmore org PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA- August 15, 2006 RECOMMENDATION Approval PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS (Please read & complete a Speaker s Form at the podIUm pnor to the start of the Planmng CormrusslOn Meetlllg The ChaIrman wIll call on you to speak when your Item IS called) 5 VIllage at Lakeshore SpecIfic Plan · The project mvolves the CIty of Lake Elslllore s adoptIOn of The VIllage at Lakeshore Specific Plan an lllfill reSIdentIal project on an approxImately twenty (20) acre sIte The commumty Will featIrre 146 attached smgle farmly condomllllUm reSIdences wIthlll thIrty-seven (37) separate bmldlllgs consIstmg pnmanly of four umts each A commumty recreatIOn faCIlIty and recreatIonal vehIcle storage area IS also proposed onsIte · MItIgated NegatIve DeclaratIon No 2006 05 · SpecIfic Plan No 2005 01 · Zone Change No 2005-01 · TentatIve Condormmum Map No 33267 · CondItIonal Use Perrmt No 2005 21 · ReSIdentIal DeSIgn ReVIew No 2005 09 CASE PLANNER Matthew CHams, Semor Planner Ext 279, rnharns@lake-elsmore org RECOMMENDATION Approval BUSINESS ITEMS INFORMATIONAL STAFF COMMENTS PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, JULY 18, 2006 6:01:00PM Chairman O'Neal called the Regular Planning C PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Chairman O'Neal led the Pledge of ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: ZANELLI, ABSENT: Also present were: Weiner, City Engi Associate Planner Resen Office to Phil Mendoza and Axel Zanelli as new None CONSENT CALENDAR Chairman O'Neal requested to pull Items No.1 and 3. ITEM NOT PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR Page Agenda Item No. \ of {, PAGE 2 - PLANNING COM11ISSION 11INUTES -JULY 18, 2006 2. Minor Design Review for a single-family residence located at 71 Via De La Valle (APN: 363-365-026). MOVED BY GONZALES, SECONDED BY MENDOZA PASSED BY A VOTE OF 4-0 BY THOSE PRESENT, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2006-62, APPRO NG A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGL~1\;lIL Y RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 71 VIA D VALLE (APN: 363-365-026). 374- ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALE' 1. Minor Design Review of a residential duplex 0 044-012). Chairman O'Neal requested the Plann and the elevation. It appears plan views shows a split so it appears that one is in fr Chairman O'Neal discuss the di "0~Bi':llCY between the plan views e continuous;;' 'i.. . g and on the elevation it er. Associate Planner Carlso the two garages. Alth the buildings look like they are split. Mr. Zubieta, th discrepancy, but a has been placed in be there is a jog, but there is Ct. Murrieta, explained that there is no ade. In order not to make it one long roof, a column he impression from the front of the building, that Chairman O'Neal, expresseCi again, that looking at it from the front it looks like there is ajog between the garage plane on the right verses the garage plane on the left; a vertical and a horizontal jog. Mr. Zubieta, agreed that it does look like there is but there isn't one. Chairman O'Neal requested any comments. There being no comments, Chairman O'Neal requested a Motion. Page 'a. \ of 6 Agenda Item No. PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -JULY 18, 2006 MOVED BY GONZALES, SECONDED BY ZANELLI AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 4-0 BY THOSE PRESENT, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2006-61, APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A DUPLEX LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF LINDSAY APPROXIMATELY 380-FEET NORTH OF SUMNER AVENUE, AT 311 LINDSAY STREJ!:'l'. (APN: 374-044-012). 3. Public Convenience and Necessity (PCN) notification for State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for Longs Drugs located. at 29985 Canyon Hills Road (Canyon Hills Marketplace). Chairman O'Neal stated that he pulled this item be~a~se it~h2l:lld have been presented as a Business Item. He asked for an explanation of theHcliff~rencebetween the last Planning Commission Meeting regarding 7-Eleven and ABC's mmendations and this week's presentation. He also requested a c1 ation as to whY7..pleven was presented with a Conditional Use Permit during the lastbllt not Longs Dlt'llgs. Community Development Director PreiseI1clanz bIt ~clPJarming Manager Tom Weiner and asked him to revie'W'.tiJ.e!PFoject with thyi0()mmiss ; and answer any questions that they may have. Planning Manager Wei state at the Municipal Code requires a Conditional Use Permit for the gas station/convem cohol, but the Municipal Code does not require it for a drug sto ubhc convenie d necessity finding generally is found within a resolution for a pro d ABC will accept that as the finding by a City. Since there isn't a mech; in our Code .at would require this type of drug store to get a CUP we have to go this rou. order to appea~~e ABC and get them the public convenience and necessity letter they need to approve this tyPe of use when an area is over concentrated as this one is on the Census tract. ... Chairman O'Neal as for a clarification between last week's denial of a project because of the high concentratio in terms of number of retail alcohol violations as opposed to this one which is also high in concentration but an approval is requested here. Planning Manager Weiner explained that the public convenience and necessity has to be made for a particular use to serve a public need or convenience. If the Commission feels that the drug store use provides a convenience and is a necessity to the people in the Canyon Hills Page ? \ of -b Agenda Item No. PAGE 4 - PLANNING COMtv1ISSION MINUTES -JULY 18, 2006 neighborhood and the commuters that go through there, then the finding can be made. As opposed to the service station and the mini-mart, there were several (mini-marts) in that area which sell alcohol and this was one of many reasons which the Commission used to deny that project. A representative from Longs Drugs is here, should there be any questions. Chairman O'Neal stated he had no questions for Longs Drugs, but wanted a clarification of what was done in the past compared to today, and the reasoning behind it. He also added that the Chief of Police had given a positive recommendation for this project yet he had not the last time. Planning Manager Weiner confirmed the Chief of Police's recommendation for this project and indicated that last time the Chiefs concerns were made clear in a letter to the staff. Chairman O'Neal requested any comments. requested a Motion. being no comments, Chairman O'Neal Y GONZALES BY THOSE NIENCE STATE BEVERAGE S LOCATED ANYON HILLS BUSINESS ITEMS INFORMATIONAL None STAFF COMMENTS Community Development Director Preisendanz commented on the following: Agenda Item No. Page ~ \ of b PAGE 5 - PLANNING COMMISSIONMINUfES -JULY 18, 2006 · He welcomed the new Commissioners to the Planning Commission and stated that the Planning Department Staff will be happy to answer any questions and be of assistance. City Engineer Seumalo commented on the followin~: · He stated that he would like to propose to the Commissign an update on Capital Improvement projects. · The City is waiting for the CalTrans permit for theQ~ega · The Railroad Canyon Road work is moving exposed piles and there is no safety issue. . ~. the paveme".., to allow the gutter in respect to a dip that it and eliminate the need for that h we would like fix as well. · Finally, the Franklin Street pave design for drainage issues but there forward, it was stuck in the next few days. . He stated that the Tuesday, July 25~2006. will be going to City Council for appeal next . The Commission coming before improvements to improved. Iso b seeing some Text Amendments to our Municipal Code the upcoming meetings. Weare trying to address some of the zoning code, as they need to be addressed and PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Commissioner Zanelli commented on the following: · Stated he is happy to be here and looks forward to working with the staff and the Commission. Agenda Tt"m No. Page _ 5_ of \ b PAGE 6 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -JULY 18, 2006 Vice Chair Gonzales commented on the following: · He welcomed the new members. Commissioner Mendoza commented on the following: · He thanked the staff for their continuous help in his first few weeks as a Commissioner and added he is looking forward to:being a part of this new and dynamic time in the City of Lake Elsinore. As .th.e Cows with control, it's wonderful to be able to contribute to it as a Com issioner. Chairman O'Neal commented on the following: . He also, welcomed Commissioner · He stated that next Tuesday when the City addressing the 7-Eleven and Lennar projects, he is going to a the meeting dress the Council to explain the reasoning for decisions mad ommlSSlOn. e past there have been a few reversals by the City Council, s explanation on how and why the Planning Commission came to their decisio propriate. ADJOURNMENT THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, CHAIRMAN O'NEAL ADJOURNED THE AT6:20:17PMONJULY18,2006. Michael O'Neal, Chairman Arsi Baron ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz, Director of Community Development Agenda Item No. Page ~ of CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DA TE: AUGUST 15, 2006 PREPARED BY: JUSTIN CARLSON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 222 NORTH RILEY STREET (APN: 374-162-028) APPLICANT: HECTOR ZUBIETAlZENOS INC.: 26397 BECKMAN COURT, MURRIETA, CA 92562 OWNER: FROY ALFARO/ALFARO INVESTMENTS: 24780 HAYS AVENUE, MURRIETA, CA 92562 PROJECT REQUEST The applicant is requesting design review consideration for a conventionally built two- story single-family dwelling unit pursuant to the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Guidelines, Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.23 (R-1 Single-Family Residential District), and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) ofthe Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Pro' ect Site North South East West Vacant Vacant Residential Vacant Residential AOENOA'TEM NO. ~ PAOE \ OF ~ ~ \ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 222 NORTH RILEY STREET (APN: 374-162-028) PROJECT LOCATION The approximately .18 acre vacant site is located on the east side of North Riley Street and approximately 120-feet south of Sumner Avenue within an area identified as Planning Area 6 of the "Historic Elsinore" Overlay District. More specifically, the property is located within the High Density (HD) Land Use area and has a General Plan designation of High Density (HD) (APN:374-162-028). PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting design review consideration for the design and establishment of a conventionally built 1,398 square-foot two (2) story single-family residence with an attached 556 square-foot two (2) car garage and a 40 square-foot front entry porch. The proposed project will have a living space of approximately 1,398 square feet, which will include three (3) bedrooms, three (3) bathrooms, dining room, living room, kitchen, and three (3) walk in closets. In addition, the proposed residence will also have one (1) fully enclosed two (2) car garage and a forty (40) square-foot front-entry porch. The total building footprint including the first floor residence, garage, and front entry porch will occupy approximately 1,152 square-feet and will have a net lot coverage of approximately sixteen percent (16%), which is in compliance with the High Density (HD) development standards of the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Guidelines. Architecture Pursuant to the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Guidelines, the architectural design of the proposed single-family dwelling unit can be identified as "Bungalow." On the north (front) elevation, the applicant is proposing to incorporate stone veneer (river rock) base furring, wood siding fascia, a garage door with window lites, decorative coach lights, exposed rafter tails, window shutters, window lites on all windows, and a stone (river rock) veneer chimney with decorative cap. AGENDA ITEM ~ PAGE ~OF31 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-F AMIL Y RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 222 NORTH RILEY STREET (APN: 374-162-028) The interior elevations will include 360-degree architectural articulation consistent with the "Bungalow" style architecture. All windows will have window lites with decorative frames, and exposed rafter tails. In addition, the applicant is choosing to wrap the stone veneer (river rock) base furring around from the front elevation to the interior wall returns. The rear (south) elevation will also have window lites with decorative surrounds and a coach light adjacent to the rear sliding window. To create "push/pull" architectural articulation on the rear elevation, the applicant is proposing to install a window pop- out on the second story, directly above the rear sliding window. This will assist in providing architectural relief on the wall elevation as well as the rear roof line. Furthermore, the applicant is proposing to incorporate a six-foot (6') high wood fence along the interior and rear property lines. However, in the rear of the property, the fence will not be located on property line, but rather will follow the line of the existing flood control channel line as identified by City of Lake Elsinore's General Plan Land Use Map (It should be noted that the Riverside County Flood Control has reviewed the current proposal and has provided staff with written confirmation that the proposed project and rear-yard fence location will not have any effect on the existing channel). The applicant will construct a six-foot (6') high wood fence with stucco finished block pilasters that connect from the interior lot line fencing to the proposed dwelling unit. Landscaoinf! Front yard landscaping will be installed and will include an automatic irrigation system and a rain sensor, which will assist in the conservation of water. The proposed landscaping will include four (4) IS-gallon Jacaranda Mimosifolia trees, multiple five (5) gallon Indian Hawthorn shrubs, Yellow Gazania groundcover, and Tall Fescue blended grass. AGENDA ITEM ~ PAGE20F~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-F AMIL Y RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 222 NORTH RILEY STREET (APN: 374-162-028) Color and Materials Roof Cedartone Flashed Comfortin Adobe Alamo Sidin Walls Window surrounds/ColumnslF ence TrimlFascia Board/Exposed Beams Base Furrin White StuccolFoamIWood River Rock S tone Veneer BACKGROUND On June 29, 2006 the Design Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the plans for the proposed single-family dwelling unit located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374- 162-028) and provided several substantive comments on the proposed architectural design, building massing, fencing along the flood control channel, and landscaping. The DRC recommended that the applicant revise the architecture to incorporate elements that are consistent with the selected style of "Bungalow" architecture. Once revised, the applicant re-submitted plans along with building elevations which incorporated the recommendations that were suggested by the DRC. ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the project and found that with the attached conditions of approval, the project meets all minimum requirements of the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Guideline and Development Standards, Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.23 (R-l, Single- Family Residential District), and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) including but not limited to; density, setbacks, landscaping, parking, and lot coverage. AGENDA ITEM d PAGE k OF 3:\ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 222 NORTH RILEY STREET (APN: 374-162-028) ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15303(a) (New Construction of Small Structures), staff has determined that the proposed project will not have a significant affect on the environment and shall therefore be exempt from the provisions of CEQA. Therefore no additional environmental clearance is necessary. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2006-_ approving the proposed single-family residence based on the following Findings, Exhibits, and the proposed Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the intended General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project will be located. The proposed Residential Design Review for a proposed single-family dwelling unit located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) complies with the goals and objectives of General Plan designation High Density (HD) as well as Zoning district High Density (HD). General Plan designation High Density (HD) is intended for multiple family attached units at the lower end of the density range and apartments or condominiums at the upper density range. In addition, the High Density (HD) General Plan designation permits a maximum density of up to twenty-four (24) dwelling units per acre. By proposing one (1) single-family residence, the proposed project located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) will cover approximately sixteen percent (16%) of the net lot area and is in compliance with the goals and objectives of the High Density (HD) designation of the General Plan, High Density (HD) Zoning District, and the General Plan/Zoning Compatibility Matrix. The approval of this single-family dwelling unit located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) will assist in achieving the development of a well AGENDA ITEM ~ PAGE 2 OF3i REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-F AMIL Y RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 222 NORTH RILEY STREET (APN: 374-162-028) balanced and functional mix of residential, limited commercial, limited industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses by providing additional affordable housing within High Density Zoning district and the City of Lake Elsinore, as well as encouraging the development and maintenance of a broad range of housing types for all income groups and age categories. It should be noted that the proposed single-family dwelling unit located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028), which incorporates "Bungalow" style architecture; will provide a well rounded design while maintaining the desirable rural characteristics and base framework to achieve quality and compatibility in the physical design of the developing portions of the City, and to enhance the existing developed areas within General Plan designation High Density (HD) and Zoning Designation High Density (HD). 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The proposed Residential Design Review located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the proposed single-family residence has provided; a twenty-foot (20 ') front-yard setback, a seventy-eight (78 ') foot rear-yard setback: sufficientfront- yard landscaping, and safe and sufficient on-site vehicular circulation. Further, the project as proposed will complement the quality of existing projects in that the applicant is providing "Bungalow" style architecture which includes; 360- degree architecture articulation pursuant to the "Historic Elsinore Design Guidelines," Bungalow style window surrounds with divided window lites, decorative coach lights, exposed rafter tails, stone veneer (river rock) front- entry columns, wood siding, window shutters, a stone veneer (river rock) chimney with a decorative cap, and a flat concrete tile roof In addition, the applicant is providing a variety of colors and materials which include LaHabra stucco painted "Adobe"; wood siding painted "Comforting; siding trim and facia boards painted "White; " and all window surrounds and pilaster fencing to be painted "Alamo. " It should be noted that the applicant is also proposing to install a stone veneer (river rock) base furring along the front (north) elevation and front-entry columns. AGENDA ITEM 'J.. PAGElL OF 21 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 222 NORTH RILEY STREET (APN: 374-162-028) 3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed Residential Design Review to be located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374- 162-028), as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City Divisions, Departments and Agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment pursuant to Article 19; (Categorical Exemptions) and Section 15303 (a), Class 3; (New Construction of Small Structures). Therefore, nofurther CEQA analysis is required. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed Residential Design Review at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) has been scheduled for consideration and action of the Planning Commission on August 15, 2006. The project has also been conditioned to comply with the LEMC. For example, Condition of Approval Number 8 has been included which states; "All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations, with revisions as noted herein. The Applicant shall meet all required setbacks and development standards pursuant to the High Density development standards as mandated in the "Historic Elsinore Overlay District;" which outlines all proposed development in the Historic Elsinore District. PREPARED BY: JUSTIN CARLSON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER APPROVED BY: Mmh- Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM 1 PAGE -=:l OF 3] REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-F AMIL Y RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 222 NORTH RILEY STREET (APN: 374-162-028) ATTACHMENTS: 1. VICINITY MAP 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 3. PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 4. CEQA-NOTICE OF EXMEPTION 5. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT PROJECT COMMENT LETTER 6. PRELIMINARY SITE/LANDSCAPE PLAN 7. FLOOR PLAN 8. ROOF PLAN 9. BUILDING ELEVATIONS 10. BUILDING SECTION AGENDA ITEM ~ PAGElL OFTI VICINITY MAP MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 222 NORTH RILEY STREET / PLANNING COMMISSION ACENDA ITEM NO. 'd PACE '1. OF:> \ RESOLUTION NO. 2006- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH RILEY STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 120-FEET SOUTH OF SUMNER AVENUE, AT 222 NORTH RILEY STREET (APN: 374-162-028) WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Hector Zubieta, requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for a single-family dwelling unit on property located on the east side of North Riley Street and approximately 120- feet south of Sumner Avenue pursuant to the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Guidelines, Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.23 (R-l Single-Family Residential), Chapter and 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of approving Minor Design Review requests for residential projects; and WHEREAS, notice of the Minor Design Review consideration has been given and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item on August 15, 2006. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed design for the single-family dwelling unit and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and determines that this project is consistent with the LEMC and the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Guidelines and is exempt from further environmental clearance under Section 15303, Class 3(a) (New Construction of Small Structures), of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the LEMC, the following findings for the approval of the project have been made as follows: ACENDA ITEM NO. ~ PACE \0 OF 3 \ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE20F4 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the intended General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project will be located. The proposed Residential Design Review for a proposed single-family dwelling unit located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) complies with the goals and objectives of General Plan designation High Density (HD) as well as Zoning district High Density (HD). General Plan designation High Density (HD) is intended for multiple family attached units at the lower end of the density range and apartments or condominiums at the upper density range. In addition, the High Density (HD) General Plan designation permits a maximum density of up to twenty-four (24) dwelling units per acre. By proposing one (1) single-family residence, the proposed project located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) will cover approximately sixteen percent (16%) of the net lot area and is in compliance with the goals and objectives of the High Density (HD) designation of the General Plan, High Density (HD) Zoning District, and the General Plan/Zoning Compatibility Matrix. The approval of this single-family dwelling unit located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) will assist in achieving the development ofa well balanced and functional mix of residential, limited commercial, limited industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses by providing additional affordable housing within High Density Zoning district and the City of Lake Elsinore, as well as encouraging the development and maintenance of a broad range of housing types for all income groups and age categories. It should be noted that the proposed single-family dwelling unit located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028), which incorporates "Bungalow" style architecture; will provide a well rounded design while maintaining the desirable rural characteristics and base framework to achieve quality and compatibility in the physical design of the developing portions of the City, and to enhance the existing developed areas within General Plan designation High Density (HD) and Zoning Designation High Density (HD). 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The proposed Residential Design Review located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the proposed single-family residence has provided; a twenty-foot (20') front-yard setback, a seventy-eight (78') foot rear-yard setback: sufficient front-yard landscaping, and safe and sufficient on-site vehicular circulation. Further, the project as proposed will complement the '\ AGENOA ITEM NO. 0<. PACE \ \ OF _ 3 \ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE30F4 quality of existing projects in that the applicant is providing "Bungalow" style architecture which includes; 360-degree architecture articulation pursuant to the "Historic Elsinore Design Guidelines," Bungalow style window surrounds with divided window lites, decorative coach lights, exposed rafter tails, stone veneer (river rock) front-entry columns, wood siding, window shutters, a stone veneer (river rock) chimney with a decorative cap, and a flat concrete tile roof In addition, the applicant is providing a variety of colors and materials which include LaHabra stucco painted "Adobe"; wood siding painted "Comforting; siding trim and facia boards painted "White;" and all window surrounds and pilaster fencing to be painted "Alamo. " It should be noted that the applicant is also proposing to install a stone veneer (river rock) base furring along the front (north) elevation and front-entry columns. 3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed Residential Design Review to be located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028), as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City Divisions, Departments and Agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment pursuant to Article 19; (Categorical Exemptions) and Section 15303 (a), Class 3; (New Construction of Small Structures). Therefore, no further CEQA analysis is required. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed Residential Design Review at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) has been scheduled for consideration and action of the Planning Commission on August 15, 2006. The project has also been conditioned to comply with the LEMC. For example, Condition of Approval Number 8 has been included which states; "All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations, with revisions as noted herein. The Applicant shall meet all required setbacks and development standards pursuant to the High Density development standards as mandated in the "Historic Elsinore Overlay District; " which outlines all proposed development in the Historic Elsinore District. AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ PAGE \~ OF 3\ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE40F4 SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of August, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENOA ITEM r~o. ~ PACE \ ~ OF 3 \ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PROJECT NAME: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 222 NORTH RILEY STREET (APN: 374-162-028) APPROVAL DATE: AUGUST 15, 2006 EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 24, 2006 EXPIRATION DATE: AUGUST 24, 2007 GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, employees, and/or agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its officials, officers, employees, or agents concerning the project attached hereto, which action is brought forward within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 65009 and Public Resources Code Section 21167. 2. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final ten (10) days from the date of the decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Council pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.80 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 3. If the project proposes an outdoor storage tank, the applicant shall locate the unit within the side or rear yards. If location must be within the front yard, the applicant shall provide a method of screening subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development or his designee. PLANNING DIVISION 4. Minor Design Review approval of a single-family dwelling unit located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) will lapse and become void one (1) year of the approval date unless a building permit is issued and construction commenced and the project is diligently being pursued toward completion. AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ PACE \ 4 OF '3\ Resolution # 2006 Project # Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) Final Conditions of Approval Date: August 15, 2006 5. All Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced upon page one of building plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division for Plan Check. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 6. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions," and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 7. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Project, the Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore to provide (a) 15% of the units constructed in the Project as affordable housing units in accordance with the requirements of Section 334l3(b )(2) of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.), or (b) an alternative equivalent action as determined by the City which may include (without limitation) dedication of vacant land, construction of affordable units on another site, or payment of an in-lieu fee at the rate of $2.00 per square-foot of assessable space for each dwelling unit in the Project. For purposes of this condition, "assessable space" means all of the square-footage within the perimeter of a structure, not including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, detached accessory structure, or similar area. The amount of the square-footage within the perimeter of a residential structure shall be calculated by the building department of the City in accordance with the standard practice of the City in calculating structural perimeters. 8. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations, with revisions as noted herein. The applicant shall meet all required setbacks, and development standards pursuant to the High Density (HD) development standards as mandated in the "Historic Elsinore Overlay District". Any revisions to the Minor Design Review attached hereto shall be processed in a similar manner as the original Minor Design Review. All plans AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ PAGE \ S OF "3 \ Resolution # 2006_ Project # Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) Final Conditions of Approval Date: August 15, 2006 submitted for Building Division plan check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by the Conditions of Approval. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the Applicant shall obtained and submit a "will serve" letter from Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. The "will serve" letter shall specifically indicate the specific water flow volumes for both domestic and fire protection water supply. 10.All materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used unless modified by the Applicant and approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 11.All windows shall use foam surrounds and/or other architectural-type features approved by the Community Development Director or designee. l2.All roofing materials shall have a minimum Class "A" Fire rating, and so noted on the construction plans. 13. The Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 14.A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers placed on the site and used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 15.The Applicant shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. Construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and no construction activity shall occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal holidays. 16. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted control techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be ACENDA ITEM NO. ) PA<iE lb. OF )\ Resolution # 2006_ Project # Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) provided thirty (30) days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer. Final Conditions of Approval Date: August 15, 2006 17.Any exterior air conditioning or other mechanical equipment shall be ground mounted and screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Air conditioning units and related equipment may not encroach more than two-feet (2') into the required minimum side yard setback. 18.Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum interior clear space of twenty feet (20') x twenty feet (20') for two cars. 19.The Applicant shall plant twenty-four inch (24") box street trees on center (o.c.), selected from the City Street Tree List, a maximum of thirty feet (30') apart and along all street frontages. Planting is subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 20.The Applicant shall provide shrubs and plant materials as shown on the landscape plan. Any changes to this plan shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. The landscape plan improvements and plantings shall be fully installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 21.Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than 36 inches. 22. The applicant shall provide an irrigation system for landscaped areas onsite as shown on the landscape plans. The irrigation system shall be fully installed and operational prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 23. The Applicant shall provide a rain sensor as shown on the landscape plan. The rain censor shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. AC~NOA lTEM NO. 1. . PA(iE \ (. OF ) \ .' Resolution # 2006 Project # Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) Final Conditions of Approval Date: August 15, 2006 24.All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, as approved by the City's Landscape Architect. A Planting and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted, approved and planted prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Fees are required for review of plans and inspections. 25.Driveways shall be constructed of concrete per Building and Safety Division standards. 26.All walls or fences located in any front yard shall not exceed thirty-six inches (36") in height with the exception that wrought-iron fences may be five feet (5') in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited. 27.All walls and/or fencing need to be located off the property line. If the Applicant proposes to place any walls and/or fencing on the property line he/she must submit a notarized agreement between the subject property owner and the adjacent property owner to the Planning Department prior to installation. 28.The applicant shall be required to remove and replace any existing chain link fencing and any fencing that is in poor condition. It will be the responsibility of the applicant to contact the effected neighboring property owners. If the existing fencing is in good condition, this requirement may be waived per the approval of the Community Development Director or Designee. 29.The building address shall be a minimum of four inches (4") high and shall be easily visible from the public right-of-way. Care shall be taken to select colors and materials that contrast with building walls or trim. 30.The applicant shall provide a flat concrete pad a minimum of 3'- 0" by 7'- 0" adjacent to each dwelling unit. The storage pad for trash barrels shall be concealed from public view. 31. The applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid prior to issuance of building permits. ACENDA ITEM NO. <J.. PACE \1, _OF ., \ Resolution # 2006_ Project # Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) Final Conditions of Approval Date: August 15, 2006 32. The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees in effect at the time prior to issuance of building permits. 33. The applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 34. The applicant shall pay the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee (MSHCP) Local Development Mitigation Fee (fee for density less than 8 dulac) prior to obtaining building permits. 35.The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $64.00 made payable to the County of Riverside for a Notice of Exemption. The check shall be submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the projects approval. 36. The applicant shall pay all applicable Library Capital Improvement Fund fee. 37. The applicant shall incorporate wrap siding on the west elevation to match the wrap siding on the east elevation. This added architectural elements shall be incorporated on the submitted construction plans prior to the issuance of a building permit. ENGINEERING DIVISION 38.All Public Works requirements shall be requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and prior to the issuance of a building permit. 39.The applicant shall submit a "will serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location. such as water pressure and volume etc. The applicant shall submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. ACENOA ITEM NO. PAGE \ '\ ? OF 3\ Resolution # 2006_ Project # Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) Final Conditions of Approval Date: August 15, 2006 40.All arrangements for the relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 41. The applicant shall provide fire protection access and facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. 42.In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the Applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Incorporated for the removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. 43.All grading and street improvement plans submitted to the Engineering Division shall be drawn on 24" x 36" Mylar and be set into the City's specific border and title block. In addition, the plans are to include city specific grading or street improvement notes for which digital files are available by request, contact aguttierrez@lake-elsinore.org. 44.All compaction reports and grade certifications shall be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to the issuance of a building permit. Street Improvements 45. The applicant shall construct all public works improvements from the property line to one foot beyond centerline of Riley Street. All pavement transitions per approved street plans (LEMC Title-12) shall be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit (LEMC 16.34). 46.A California Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare street and alley improvement plans and specifications. All improvements shall be designed and constructed as per Riverside County Road Department Standards latest edition and all Lake Elsinore city codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). All street improvement plans shall show all existing and future profiles at centerline of the street at top of the curb and at centerline of the alley. The profiles and ACENDA ITEM NO. ~ PACe Q.D OF 3 \ Resolution # 2006_ Project # Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) Final Conditions of Approval Date: August 15, 2006 contours shall extend to 50' beyond the property limits on the Riley Street centerline. 47.If the existing street improvements are to be modified, the existing street plans on file shall be modified accordingly and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit. An approved encroachment permit will be required to do the work. 48.All work done under an encroachment permit for off-site improvements shall be delineated on the street improvement plans and approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. 49. The applicant shall pay all fees and meet all requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of all off-site public works improvements (LEMCI2.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy. Grading 50. The applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 51. The applicant shall apply and obtain an approved grading permit (with appropriate security) prior to any grading activity. 52.A grading plan stamped/signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer is required since the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards and the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. The grading plan shall show the volumes of cut and fill, adequate contours and/or spot elevations of the existing ground as surveyed by a licensed surveyor or civil engineer. All contours shall extend to a minimum of IS-feet beyond property lines and shall indicate the existing drainage pattern. The Applicant/Developer shall apply and obtain a grading permit (with the appropriate security) prior to the issuance of a grading permit. ACENOA ITEM NO. PACE Q \ ~ OF 1\ Resolution # 2006_ Project # Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) Final Conditions of Approval Date: August 15, 2006 53. The applicant is to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The Applicant/Developer shall contribute to the protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 54.All grading shall be done under the supervision of geotechnical engineer and he/she shall certify the stability of all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 and the implementation of proper erosion control measures on the project site. Drainage 55.All on-site drainage shall be conveyed to the city public facility (including the County Flood Control), or accepted by the adjacent property owners (via a notarized letter of drainage acceptance), or conveyed to a drainage easement. 56. The final floor elevation shall be greater or equal to 1267.00. 57.All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site or shall be collected and conveyed by a method to be approved by the City Engineer. 58.All roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through any/all coring in the street curb. All roofs shall drain to a landscaped area. All driveways shall be sloped to drain into landscaping prior to entering street facilities. Fees 59. The applicant shall pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34). The current traffic mitigation fee is $1,369.00, the current drainage fee is $6665.00 (Town No.3 Dist.), and the current TUMF amount is $9693.00. All fees are required to be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit and shall comply with the fee schedule in effect at the time of payment of fees. ACENOA ''rEM NO. ~ PACE ~?.. OF ~ \ Resolution # 2006 Project # Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) Final Conditions of Approval Date: August 15, 2006 Stormwater/Cleanwater Protection Program 59. The City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into any/all storm drain systems or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION 60. The developer is to pay park fees of $1 ,600 per unit ($1,600). 61. The developer is to participate in the City-wide Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District (LLMD). 62. The developer is to meet City curb, gutter, and sidewalk requirements. 63. The developer is to comply with all City Ordinances regarding construction debris removal and recycling as per Section 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). LAKE ELSINORE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 64. Under the provisions of SB 50, the owner or developer will be required to pay school fees or enter into a mitigation agreement prior to the issuance of certificate of compliance by the District. ACENDA ITEM NO. ~ PAGE a3 _OF '3\ Resolution # 2006_ Project # Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028) Final Conditions of Approval Date: August 15, 2006 ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 65.Water and sewer is available for the project. The applicant is to request a "will serve" letter from Elsinore Valley Municipal District. ACENDA ITn1 NO. ~ PAGE ~ '" r OF ')\ Notice of Exemption City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (909) 674-3124 (909) 471-1419 fax Filed With: 0 Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 [8J County Oerk of Riverside County 2724 Gateway Drive Riverside,CA 92507 Project Tide: Minor Design Review of a Single- Family Residence located at 222 North Riley Street (APN: 374-162-028). Project Location (Specific): The proposed project is located on the east side of North Riley Street and approximately 120-feet south of Sumner Avenue, within Area 6 of the "Historic Elsinore" overlay district. Project Location (Gt)1: Gtyof Lake Elsinore Project Location (Count)1: Riverside County Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project: The applicant is proposing to develop a 1,398 square-foot conventionally built two (2) story single-family residence with an attached 556 square-foot two (2) car garage and forty (40) square-foot front entry porch. The total building footprint, including the first (1st) floor residence, garage, and front-entry porch will occupy approximately 1,152 square-feet and will have a net lot coverage of approximately sixteen percent (16%); which is in compliance with the High Density (lID) development standards of the Historic E Isirore A rchita:tural Design Guidelirrs. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: Gty of Lake Elsinore Name of Person / Agency Administrating Project: Justin Carlson, Associate Planner, Gty of Lake Elsinore Exempt Status: o Ministerial (Section 15073) o Declared Emergency (Section 15071 (a)) o Emergency Project (Section 15071 (b) and (c)) I8l Categorical Exemption (state type and section number): Article 19 Categorical Exemptions Section 15303, Qass 3 (a) New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures Reasons why project is exempt: This project meets the requirements pursuant to Section 15303 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Contact Person: Justin Carlson, Associate Planner Telephone Number: (951) 674-3124 x 295 Signed: Title: Director of Community Development Rolfe M Preisendanz AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE ~S ~ OF 3\ WARREN D. WILLIAMS General Manager-Chief Engineer RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 951.955.1200 951.788.9965 FAX /r'":'"'o-;;.- /tJl~~-- ~ ~~<< c/rYOf;--~ p ,,'-/;1;'[ 0, -....JA:lfV/AIf' o [LMI/ODC --- I, u IVlo Ill.; 'c1/ON City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Attention: :::1\^":7"'\\ ~ c..~ SO~ Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: ~D(1,. Of"...5in'2- o~ \2-\\..rs:---r S\. The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of s~cifjc Interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical componenf or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issue: No comment. ~ Thisprolect would not be impacted by District MasterOrainl:lgePlal'lfClc:iUti~s nor are other facilities of regional Interest proposed. This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be ,required. This project propOses channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter or other facilities that could be conSidered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted Master Drainage Plan. The District woulCl consider accepting ownership of such faCilities on wntten request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. This project is located within the limits of the District's Area . Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; ar>Pllcable fees Should be paid by cashier's check or money order only to the Flood Control District or City prior to issuance of grading permifs. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. An encroachment r>ermit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right of way or facilities. For further information, contact the District's encroachment permit section at 951.955.1266. . GENERAL INFORMATION This project may reguire a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) p'ermit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approvaf should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapr>ed flood plain, then the City should require tile applicant to provide all studies, calculations. plans and other Information re~uired to meet FEMA re~uirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map ReViSion. (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the. project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department OT Fish and Game anCl a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these reqUirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may ~e required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of tlie Corps 404 permit. j I iO> ~I :=i 'm ~I C 11 ~ @r -<I ~ 0> ~ ~I I rlj'[I::::::::::I:::j:::: - . .............. - . . . . . . . -."". 1% ~I ~I ....ot I Ii r --m-l "'- " Iii h N' t8I .' .... ItX:lD&l PIMCa II x. '\ '\ Ii 1 p~ , ~ a -- - 1!IG' ~.,.....~1'ItCIt ........ ..-.c' Ii ~I ~~ i ~i ~ Ii ; ~~ i ~: 1=1 ~~ ~ 2~ ~ II I~ ~ I a g~; . ~ x~ S ~ ~ -(~... Iii r~ 8 !:; ~ i i :i~ ~ it! G\ ~. ~ n 2;f . II ;a U ~ i ~ ~~ i i e S~~~I!! iI 8.... ~ ~ :f n ~.. ~ InUL= iljlHIPi! IIlqrl il! IIII~ ~ EA~ ft~ 0> iq~qs a~ II iU ~nqffi I, I;i~' ~ _ Q, !, II . . · 1 <.. I~ a ~ ~ pP~!!1 ! I!ljj Ii II if ; p: i il.; I ~ II II I I,WI ........ K . ~ ~ .npz . . ~ i i1I 1;% ~I~ hi i~ ;rl !s I i ~ ~ n j I- f! ~ &1 If ~ J II! ~ ~~ i ! ~ I II il ~ III 12 I Ii 0 _ ~ ~~G;.~~~H (p I P i ~ i I .... ~ r - IE ~ i i ~ . i~ I -{ ~ ~ o~I.__'. I! - . ! I :I I H i ~l ~ Pqil i Ii .. 11 ~ i . Z t ~ i i 3 : . t AGENDA ITEM PAOS ALFARO INVESTMENTS 222 N. RILEY ST. LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 e --,.'- IIfSOt ,. -... ..... ..,... + a:MIEJlClIll + lIQ5lMll lUf7 ~ cr... ..--. ~_ N -......uD filii 111.- .- SITE PLAN/PROJECT DATA 11 v r i () . () L~ ~ it:r , @ ~~~~ t (p m (\ ~ tl 11 r ~~ ill ~:r ~~~ "5' "i'", ~ ~ e..:.:..... FLOOR PLAN 1IE5IIOftW.+~+____ 21J1'71l'CllW1lcr..--'~aIIl ... .~ .. ""...... I-~ ~ ~ ....oj. ...oj' ...-coj' ~ .t . ~ I I ~-, ~ r .-.oj- .-.oj- J'-.j" ,..... "'.2" ,.... ~ . . i , ~. f ~., , -, ~ ~ . f 4 , a-.oj' ...oj' c!> :I, ~1Ii;J"T'''P r=.,,~ .... I!I ilill! II !~ ill!; ; iljUl1 ! illllll!ilii rili~n I !i lI!i ! II Ii', !i'PiHli II!!II ! i; iiill i i!!!; ilill II i! IIII! G I If ~ ,I I~fl ~.I ~llli I Iii ti .bb IIII1 Ii ~ I i~i ~ II : Ii !I ; II II'~ I N i~ I!III I tli . IIC I ; ;1, IIi III Ii Iii Mh I ~!Pi ~~'i ! d'l ! dli1i i' I ~ Il I~I j I '. I j ALFARO INVESTMENTS 222 N. RILEY ST. E ELSINORE. CA 92530 ~ ~ ~;!! ;1> .z o I: I ~. Ii It ~Ii I! Illifl: a ill ~I ~d~ z h. lIQ ;. i~ 0 1~ ~- .~l ~ iil ~~ II II a .. 32 q I~ ~i I 58 ,_ ~ d . t , I ~ . i i - - t Iii i! ~ a I I ti ACENDA ITEM NO. PACE ~ ~ OF '3 \ . ......... . ....... + 8IUPIllIll ..,. _ Cf... ...--. 0. I2SG ....~ _ IMMa.IPI .- 1& ...... ,..... _eIi. - ROOF PLAN ALFARO INVESTMENTS 222 N. RILEY ST. LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 o @ @@ 0 ~; ;i; ~~; ~III ~ 191 5 I U~ .S & I "11' II i Ii Ii ~;i Ii ~H !~ ~ ~ ! i e II ~ I~! lib I ~I ~ I I' III IIi! qj Iii I I ~ ! ~~ I II ~ I~ "..>!" ~ - .... ,...... ._~_ ELEVATIONS ~.~+1IltlPIlMl .., IE.:- Cf. IILIIII[U" a. a2SIi2 fIN.......... __~ .--.... ~ ~ . z "'--1' ALFARO INVESTMENTS 22 N. RILEY ST. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 ~" . n: ~.I~lli ~U ~ ~ 1= , I U! . ~iElii h i ~ I ! % a;!iM .~ ! n d IIi!iI~! '~ 11 l~ ~ a~~ ~ I ~i ~I ~; ~. ~ ~ r ~ ~ ':)'-)' W., ...oj' . R . l! I i It ;~ & 0 ,. ,- ; ~. i 'I n II ~ ~ ~; B ~ ~. ~ t F ~ , , r ~ . · i , ~ i . ~ ~ !: .._r t "'.001- -.=-- BUILDING sECTlo~ENDA ITEM ~~E. PACE .- ALFARO INVESTMENTS 22 N, RILEY ST. LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: AUGUST 15, 2006 PREPARED BY: AGUSTIN RESENDIZ, ASSOCIATE PLANNER PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATION FOR A MANUFACTURED TWO-STORY SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 17395 BROMLEY AVENUE (APN 378-142-016) APPLICANT: RICK MOON/NOW CONSTRUCTION, 15403 GRAND AVENUE, LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 PROJECT REQUEST Staff is requesting that this project be continued in order to further review the design concept and the building architecture presented by the applicant. Therefore, the proposed project would be rescheduled for the September 19, 2006 Planning Commission meeting. PREPARED BY: AGUSTIN RESENDIZ, ASSOCIATE PLANNER APPROVED BY: l::-~ ~ ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACENOA liEM NO. :, PAGE \ ..OF \ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: AUGUST 15, 2006 PREPARED BY: MATTHEW C. HARRIS, SENIOR PLANNER PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RILEY STREET AND 370 FEET NORTH OF HEALD AVENUE (APN: 374-161-011) APPLICANT: HECTOR ZUBIETAJZENOS INC.: 26397 BECKMAN COURT, MURRIETA, CA 92562 OWNER: FROY ALFARO/ALFARO INVESTMENTS: 24780 HAYS AVENUE, MURRIETA, CA 92562 PROJECT REQUEST The applicant is requesting design review consideration for a residential duplex. The proposed duplex units will be available for rent. Review is pursuant to the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Guidelines, Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). PROJECT LOCATION The approximately .20 acre vacant site is located on the west side of Riley Street and approximately 370-feet north of Heald Avenue within an area identified as Planning Area 6 of the "Historic Elsinore" Overlay District. More specifically, the property is located within the High Density Residential (HD) land use area and has a General Plan designation of High Density (HD) (APN: 374-161-011). AGENDA ITEM t~O. PACE \ OF 4-~'1 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: MDR OF A RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX LOCATED ON RILEY STREET (APN: 374-161-011) ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Pro'ect Site North South East West Vacant Vacant Residential Residential Residential PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting design review consideration for the development of a single-story conventionally built attached duplex. The development will consist of two (2) units, each having a living space area of approximately 1,048 square-feet, which will include three (3) bedrooms, two (2) baths, a dining room, and kitchen. The project will also have one (1) fully enclosed two-car garage for each living unit and two (2) uncovered parking spaces for a total of six (6) off-street parking spaces, which will be accessed via a l2-foot wide driveway. Private open space areas will also be provided as part of the proposed project. Architecture Pursuant to the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Guidelines, the architectural design of the duplex can be identified as "Monterey". Staff worked closely with the applicant to achieve additional articulation along the street side (front) building elevation including an I8-inch deep "blind arcade" and a recessed window. Moreover, the applicant has agreed to use a smooth stucco finish on the building serving to further enhance the architectural style. The applicant is also proposing a variety of decorative architectural elements consistent with the "Monterey" style architecture. These elements include ornamental post caps, arched windows, decorative wood shutters and exterior light fixtures. In addition to incorporating elements indicative to the selected architecture, the applicant is also proposing to install fencing on the right-of-way elevation that AGEND~TEM 4- PAGE OF =TI REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: MDR OF A RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX LOCATED ON RILEY STREET (APN: 374-161-011) represents an extension of the architectural theme selected. A decorative five-foot (5') high masonry wall including pilasters with brick veneer, ornamental wrought iron fencing and a stucco base will be erected along the front property line. In addition, six- foot (6') high wood fencing will be erected along the side and rear property lines. Landscaving The applicant is proposing to develop the site with 2,992 square feet of landscaping. In addition to being automatically irrigated, the landscaping will include six (6) fifteen gallon "Crape Myrtle" and two (2) "Jacaranda" trees. Foundation and accentplantings will consist of "Indian Hawthorn" and "Glossy Abelia" that will be utilized along with "Tall Fescue Blend" turf at the front and rear of the development. Color and Materials Roof Walls Facia, Columns, Wood Carlsbad Blend (Hacienda) Base 200 X-82 Da er Tan 10YY Capistrano Style By Eagle La Habra Stucco Glidden ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the project and found that with the attached conditions of approval, the project meets all minimum requirements of the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Guidelines and Development Standards and Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). Minimum requirements included, but were not limited to; density, setbacks, landscaping, parking, private open space, and lot coverage. Parking and circulation The proposed parking and circulation meets the requirements of Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements). Section 17.66.030, l.b (2) requires the following: For multi-family and attached single-family dwellings, duplexes: AGENDA ITEM ~ PAGElOF~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: MDR OF A RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX LOCATED ON RILEY STREET (APN: 374-161-011) For two or more bedrooms: one covered space, plus one and one- third (1-1/3) open spaces per dwelling unit. The applicant has met the minimum requirements as mandated by Section 17.66.030 of the LEMC, by providing a fully enclosed 2-car garage for each dwelling unit plus one and one-third (1-1/3) uncovered (open) parking spaces onsite. The applicant is also proposing to provide two (2) concrete "mow" strip parking spaces in a tandem position instead of solid hardscape parking spaces. This will allow the applicant to achieve the one and one-third (1-1/3) parking space requirement as well as incorporating additional landscaping. Architecture The proposed architectural design ofthe duplex meets the requirements set forth within the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Guidelines (Appropriate Architectural Styles for Residential Uses). The Architectural Design Guidelines for the land use in which this project is located, states that: A variety of residential styles are allowed including Bungalow, Craftsman, Spanish Eclectic (which may include elements of the Mission style), Folk Victorian, Monterey, Prairie, Shingle and Victorian Stick. In compliance, the applicant has chosen a "Monterey" architectural style for the proposed duplex. In conformance with the Historic District, the applicant has incorporated architectural elements consistent with and according to the "Monterey" design standards as stated within the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Guidelines. Landscaping The proposed landscaping meets the requirements set forth within Section V (Landscape Standards) of the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Guidelines. The proposed landscaping serves to emphasize and enhance the established character by incorporating landscape design criteria, which will upgrade and support the downtown 1920' s theme and the desired character of the existing neighborhoods AGENDA ITEM ~ PAGE~OF~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: MDR OF A RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX LOCATED ON RILEY STREET (APN: 374-161-011) Color and Materials The proposed colors and materials comply with the requirements of the Historic Elsinore Architectural Guidelines in that the colors and materials proposed have been selected from the approved color palate and will complement and enhance one another as well as the surrounding neighborhood. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to the CalifomiaEnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15303(b) (New Construction of Small Structures), staffhas determined that the proposed project will not have a significant affect on the environment and is therefore exempt from the provisions of CEQA. Therefore, no additional environmental clearance is necessary. RECOMMENDATION Staffrequests that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2006-_ approving the proposed residential duplex based on the following Findings, Exhibits, and the proposed Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the intended General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project will be located. The proposed Residential Design Review for a proposed duplex located on the west side of Riley Street and 370feet north of Heald Avenue (APN: 374-161- 011) complies with the goals and objectives of General Plan designation High Density (HD). General Plan designation High Density (HD) is intendedfor a wide range of residential development types including attached and detached single-family units at the lower end of the range and multiple family units at the higher end of the density range. In addition, the High Density General Plan designation permits a maximum density of twenty-four (24) dwelling units per acre. The proposed duplex located at APN: 374-161-011) is well below the maximum density allowed. Therefore, the proposed project is in compliance AGENDA ITEM ~ PAGE~OF~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: MDR OF A RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX LOCATED ON RILEY STREET (APN: 374-161-011) with the High Density (HD) requirements by proposing two (2) dwelling units for the entire existing lot. The approval of this duplex will assist in achieving the development of a well balanced and functional mix of residential, limited commercial, limited industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses by providing additional affordable housing within the City of Lake Elsinore, as well as encouraging the development and maintenance of a broad range of housing types for all income groups and age categories. It should be noted that the proposed dwelling unit located at APN: 374-161-011), which incorporates "Monterey" style architecture; will provide a well rounded design while maintaining the desirable rural characteristics and base framework to achieve quality and compatibility in the physical design of the developing portions of the City, and to enhance the existing developed areas with General Plan designation High Density (HD). 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The proposed Residential Design Review at APN: 374-161-011 is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the duplex project has provided; a twenty foot (20') front yard setback, two (2) 100 square-foot private open spaces; sufficientfront and rear yard landscaping and safe and sufficient on-site vehicular circulation. Further, the project as proposed will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non- detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects in that the applicant is providing a "Monterey" architecture which include; 360-degree architectural articulation pursuant to the "Historic Elsinore Design Guidelines", Monterey arched windows with divided lites, decorative coach lights,facia board trim" decorative wood posts, decorative shutters, decorative garage and front-entry doors, and a concrete "s" tile roof In addition, the applicant is providing a variety of colors and materials which include Lahabra stucco painted beige "Hacienda"; columns, facial and wood painted with a tan base. 3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. AGENDA ITEM ~ PAGE --b- OF ~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: MDR OF A RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX LOCATED ON RILEY STREET (APN: 374-161-011) Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed Residential Design Review to be located at APN: 374-161-011), as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City Divisions and Departments and Agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment pursuant to Article 19; (Categorical Exemptions) and Section 15303 (b), Class 3; (New Construction of Small Structures); therefore, no further environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed Residential Design Review has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission. The proposed project has also been conditioned to comply with the LEMC. The Applicant shall meet all required setbacks and development standards pursuant to the High Density development standards as mandated in the "Historic Elsinore Overlay District"; which outlines all development in the Historic Elsinore Design Guidelines. PREPARED BY: MATTHEW C. HARRIS, SENIOR PLANNER APPROVED BY: ~~~~ ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENDA ITEM ~ PAGElOF~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: MDR OF A RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX LOCATED ON RILEY STREET (APN: 374-161-011) ATTACHMENTS: 1. VICINITY MAP 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 3. PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 4. CEQA-NOTICE OF EXEMPTION 5. SITE & LANDSCAPE PLAN 6. FLOOR PLAN 7. ROOF PLAN 8. ELEVATIONS 9. BUILDING SECTIONS AGEND~ ITEM ~ PAGE OF~ VICINITY MAP RILEY STREET DUPLEX MINOR DESIGN REVIEW PLANNING COMMISSION su:~~L C ACENDA ITEM NO. ~ PACE ~ . OF A ~ , RESOLUTION NO. 2006- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A DUPLEX LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RILEY STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 370-FEET NORTH OF HEALD AVENUE, (APN: 374-161-011). WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Hector Zubieta, requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for a duplex on property located on the west side of Riley Street and approximately 370-feet north of Heald Avenue pursuant to the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Guidelines, Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.23 (Single-Family Residential), Chapter and 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of approving Minor Design Review requests for residential projects; and WHEREAS, notice of the Minor Design Review consideration has been given and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item on August 15, 2006. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed design for the residential duplex and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and determines that this project is consistent with the LEMC and is exempt from further environmental clearance under Section 15303, Class 3(b) (New Construction of Small Structures), of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the LEMC, the following findings for the approval of the project have been made as follows: 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the intended General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project will be located. _' :'!~ i';\) 4_ ____ "~ \0 -y' . ~<;\- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE20F4 The proposed Residential Design Review for a proposed duplex located on the west side of Riley Street and 370-feet north of Heald Avenue (APN: 374- 161-011) complies with the goals and objectives of General Plan designation High Density (HD). General Plan designation High Density (HD) is intended for a wide range of residential development types including attached and detached single-family units at the lower end of the range and multiple family units at the higher end of the density range. In addition, the High Density General Plan designation permits a maximum density of twenty-four (24) dwelling units per acre. The proposed duplex located at (APN: 374-161-011) is well below the maximum density allowed. The proposed project is in compliance with the High Density (HD) requirements by proposing two (2) dwelling units for the entire existing lot. The approval of this single-family dwelling unit will assist in achieving the development of a well balanced and functional mix of residential, limited commercial, limited industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses by providing additional affordable housing within the City of Lake Elsinore, as well as encouraging the development and maintenance of a broad range of housing types for all income groups and age categories. It should be noted that the proposed dwelling unit located on the west side of Riley Street and 370-feet north of Heald Avenue (APN: 374-161-011), which incorporates "Mediteranean" style architecture; will provide a well rounded design while maintaining the desirable rural characteristics and base framework to achieve quality and compatibility in the physical design of the developing portions of the City, and to enhance the existing developed areas with General Plan designation High Density (HD). 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The proposed Residential Design Review on the north side of Riley street and 370-feet west of Heald Avenue (APN: 374-161-011) is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the duplex project has provided; a twenty foot (20') front yard setback, two (2) 100 square-foot private open spaces; sufficient front and rear yard landscaping and safe and sufficient on-site vehicular circulation. Further, the project as proposed will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects in that the applicant is providing a "Monterey" AGENDA'TEM NO. 4- PAGE_ \ \ OF ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE30F4 architecture which include; 360-degree architectural articulation pursuant to the "Historic Elsinore Design Guidelines", Aarched windows with divided lites, decorative coach lights, ornamental column caps, decorative garage and front-entry doors, and a concrete "s" tile roof In addition, the applicant is providing a variety of colors and materials which include Lahabra stucco painted beige "Hacienda"; columns and window surrounds painted with a Hacienda base and exposed wood rafters, which will be painted "Dapper Tan ". 3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed Residential Design Review to be located at (APN: 374-364-011), as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City Divisions and Departments and Agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment pursuant to Article 19; (Categorical Exemptions) and Section 15303 (b), Class 3; (New Construction of Small Structures); therefore, no further environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed Residential Design Review has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission. The proposed project has also been conditioned to comply with the LEMC. The Applicant shall meet all required setbacks and development standards pursuant to the High Density development standards as mandated in the "Historic Elsinore Overlay District"; which outlines all development in the Historic Elsinore Design Guidelines. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ _ PACE \ l.. OF ~9\ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE40F4 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of August, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development ACENOA ITEM NO. lr PAGE \~ OFA ~~ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PROJECT NAME: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A DUPLEX LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RILEY STREET, 370 FEET WEST OF HEALD AVENUE (APN: 374-161-011) APPROVAL DATE: AUGUST 15,2006 EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 25, 2006 EXPIRATION DATE: AUGUST 25, 2007 Note: Fees listed in the Conditions of Approval are the best estimates available at the time of approval. The exact fee amounts will be reviewed at the time of permit issuance and may be revised. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, employees, and/or agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its officials, officers, employees, or agents concerning the project attached hereto, which action is brought forward within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 65009 and Public Resources Code Section 21167. 2. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final ten (10) days from the date of the decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Council pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.80 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. PLANNING DIVISION 3. The Minor Design Review approval of a residential duplex located on the west side of Riley Road and 370-feet east of Heald Avenue (APN 374-161-011) will lapse and become void one (1) year of the approval date unless a building permit is issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion. 4. All Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced upon page one of building plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division for Plan Check. All ACERDA ITEM NO. ~ PACE \5 OF~ ~ Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 5. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the Applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions," and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 6. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits, all project plans shall be modified so as to be consistent with the approved site/landscaping plan. 7. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Project located on the west side of Riley Road and 370-feet north of Heald Avenue (APN: 374-161-011), the Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore to provide either (a) 15% of the units constructed in the Project as affordable housing units in accordance with the requirements of Section 334l3(b )(2) of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.), or (b) an alternative equivalent action as determined by the City which may include (without limitation) dedication of vacant land, construction of affordable units on another site, or payment of an in-lieu fee at the rate of $2.00 per square-foot of assessable space for each dwelling unit in the Project. For purposes of this condition, "assessable space" means all of the square-footage within the perimeter of a structure, not including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, detached accessory structure, or similar area. The amount of the square-footage within the perimeter of a residential structure shall be calculated by the building department of the City in accordance with the standard practice of the City in calculating structural perimeters. 8. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations, with revisions as noted herein. The applicant shall meet all required setbacks and development standards pursuant to the High Density development standards as mandated in the "Historic Elsinore Overlay District". Any revisions to the Minor Design Review attached hereto shall be processed in a similar manner as the original Minor Design Review. All plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of Approval. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the Applicant shall obtained and submit a "will serve" letter from Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. The "will serve" letter shall specifically indicate the specific water flow volumes for both ACENDA ITeM NO. ~ PACE 1.& OF~~_ domestic and fire protection water supply. 10.All materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used unless modified by the Applicant and approved by the Director of Community Development or designee. II.All windows shall use foam surrounds and/or other architectural-type features approved by the Director of Community Development or designee. 12.All roofing materials shall have a minimum Class "A" Fire rating, and so noted on the construction plans. 13. The Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 14.A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers placed on the site and used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development or designee. 15. The Applicant shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. Construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and no construction activity shall occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal holidays. 16. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted control techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided thirty (30) days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer. 17.Any exterior air conditioning or other mechanical equipment shall be ground mounted and screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Air conditioning units and related equipment may not encroach more than two-feet (2') into the required minimum side yard setback. 18.Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum interior clear space of twenty feet (20') x twenty feet (20') for two cars. 19.The Applicant shall plant twenty-four inch (24") box street trees selected from the City Street Tree List, a maximum of thirty feet (30') apart along all street frontages. Planting is subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE \1 OF 20.The Applicant shall provide shrubs and plant materials as shown on the landscape plan. Any changes to this plan shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development or designee. The landscape plan improvements and plantings shall be fully installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 21.Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than 36 inches. 22. The Applicant shall provide an irrigation system for landscaped areas on site as shown on the landscape plans. The irrigation system shall be fully installed and operational prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 23. The Applicant shall provide a rain sensor as shown on the landscape plan. The rain censor shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 24.All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, as approved by the City's Landscape Architect. A Planting and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted, approved and planted prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Fees are required for review of plans and inspections. 25.Driveways shall be constructed of concrete per Building and Safety Division standards. 26.All walls or fences located in any front yard shall not exceed thirty-six inches (36") in height with the exception that wrought-iron fences may be five feet (5') in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited. 27.All walls and/or fencing need to be located off the property line. If the Applicant proposes to place any walls and/or fencing on the property line he/she must submit a notarized agreement between the subject property owner and the adjacent property owner to the Planning Department prior to installation. 28. The proposed front yard fencing pilasters shall aesthetically match the exterior of the house. If the proposed pilasters are to deviate from the finish of the house, the applicant shall submit elevations to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. 29.All side yard retaining walls shall be located off the property line unless the 4- AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE \~ OF ~9.. applicant attains and submits a notarized agreement between the subject property owner and the adjacent property owner to the Planning Department, prior to installation. In addition, all retaining walls shall be effectively screened using an permanently irrigated climbing plant material to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. 30.The building address shall be a minimum of four inches (4") high and shall be easily visible from the public right-of-way. Care shall be taken to select colors and materials that contrast with building walls or trim. 31.The Applicant shall provide a flat concrete pad a minimum of 3'- 0" by 7'- 0" adjacent to each dwelling unit. The storage pad for trash barrels shall be concealed from public view. 32.The Applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid prior to issuance of building permits. 33. The Applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees in effect at the time prior to issuance of building permits. 34. The Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 35.The Applicant shall pay the Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee (MSHCP) Local Development Mitigation Fee (fee for density less than 8 du/ac) prior to obtaining building permits. 36. The Applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $64.00 made payable to the County of Riverside for a Notice of Exemption. The check shall be submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the projects approval. 37.The Applicant shall pay all applicable Library Capital Improvement Fund fees. ENGINEERING DIVISION GENERAL: 38.All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to building permit. AGENDA ItEM NO. _~ PACE \ ~OF. ! ~ 39. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location. such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. 40.Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 41.Provide fire protection access and facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. 42.In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 43.Construct curb and gutter and pavement from curb and gutter to one foot beyond centerline of Riley Street. Minimum structural section of the pavement shall be 3" AC over 4" AB. Plans must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit (LEMC 16.34). 44.A Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare street and alley improvement plans and specifications. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). Street improvement plans shall show existing and future profiles at centerline of street, at top of curb. The profiles and contours shall extend to 50' beyond the property limits on Riley Street. 45.If the existing street improvements are to be modified, the existing street plans on file shall be modified accordingly and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit. An encroachment permit will be required to do the work. 46.Work done under an encroachment permit for off-site improvements shall be delineated on the street improvement plans and approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. AGENDA lTEM NO.~. ~OF~ 47.Pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of off-site public works improvements (LEMCI2.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy. 48.All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. GRADING 49.Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to any grading activity. 50.A grading plan stamped/signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer is required since the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards and or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. The grading plan shall show volumes of cut and fill, adequate contours and/or spot elevations of the existing ground as surveyed by a licensed surveyor or civil engineer. Contours shall extend to minimum of 15 feet beyond property lines to indicate existing drainage pattern. Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to grading permit issuance. 51.In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. 52.Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 53.All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. AGENDA ITEM NO.,. 4 PACe ,~LOF__~'.._ DRAINAGE: 54.0n-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent property owners by a notarized letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage easement. 55.All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 56.Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roof shall drain to a landscaped area. 57.Convey historic flows through the site, provide means to collect and drain flows from westerly property into the Riley Street without flooding the backyard. FEES: 58.Payall Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34). For each unit the current traffic mitigation fee is $1,369.00; the current drainage fee is $491.00 (Town No.3. Dist.) and the current TUMF amount is $9,693.00, the amount of fees shall be adiusted according to the fee schedule current at the time of payment. STORMW A TER/ CLEANW ATER PROTECTION PROGRAM 59.City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law . Specific comments re2ardin2 the Draina2e plan submitted: Site Plan: ACENDA ITnt NO.~ ~ tJAG~~~ OF__. L~~~ A. Minimum driveway approach width is 12 feet, remove existing masonry wall to provide for the 12 feet driveway. Drainage Plan: B. Show final surface elevations on plan view and drainage pattern arrows. Divert the runoff from roof and driveway through landscaping before it enters street. C. Reverse direction of arrows of the D-D section to match the Riley Avenue Typical Section. D. Call out removal of existing masonry walls where appropriate. Show replacement of pavement to one foot beyond centerline of Riley Street. E. Earthen swale in the backyard (Section B-B) is preferred to be 3' from back property line rather than building edge. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 60. The Applicant is to pay park fees of $1 ,600 per unit. 61. The Applicant will be required to participate in the "Public Facility" fee program. 62. The Applicant is to comply with all City Ordinances regarding construction debris removal and recycling as per Section 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. LAKE ELSINORE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 63.Under the provisions of SB 50, the owner or developer will be required to pay school fees or enter into a mitigation agreement prior to the issuance of a certificate of compliance by the district. ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 64. The Applicant shall request a "will serve" letter for service of sewer and water. ~INCA ITIM NO.~.._ PAijl_~-=~~ Notice of Exemption City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (909) 674-3124 (909) 471-1419 fax Filed With: 0 Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 [8J County Oerk of Riverside County 2724 Gateway Drive Riverside, CA 92507 Project Title: Minor Design Review of a Duplex located on Riley Street. Project Location (Specific): The proposed project is located on the west side of Riley Street and 370 feet north of Heald Avenue, within Area 6 of the "Historic Elsinore" overlay district. (APN: 374-161-011). Project Location (Gty): Gtyof Lake Elsinore Project Location (County): Riverside County Description of Nature, Pwpose, and Beneficiaries of Project: The applicant is proposing to develop a single-story conventionally built attached duplex. The development will consist of two (2) units, each having a living space area of approximately 1048-feet with one (1) fully enclosed two (2) car garage for each dwelling unit. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: Gty of Lake Elsinore Name of Person / Agency Administrating Project: Matthew C. Harris, Senior Planner, Gty of Lake Elsinore Exempt Status: D Ministerial (Section 15073) D Declared Emergency (Section 15071 (a)) D Emergency Project (Section 15071 (b) and (c)) ~ Categorical Exemption (state !)Fe and section number): Article 19 Categorical Exemptions Section 15303, Oass 3 (b) New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures Reasons why project is exempt: This project meets the requirements pursuant to Section 15303 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Contact Person: Matthew C Harris, Senior Planner Telephone Number: (951) 674-3124 x 279 Signed: Title: Director of Community Development Rolfe M Preisendanz Ae~"\)~ IteM 'M~~._.- ~._.~ f)A~~~~F., ..a.-~2l::, I' I~ ;<!! i b II 'iit ~ ~ 11 I Jij 5' ~ I; II ~ : I r 111:11 I.dli II II ~ ~ : -~ 1~llnl .tlli~ I"" ......, J I~~ lis I - - ..... - - - -- ..... - - -- -... 5~ I !~ I I ~ ~ 11 11 ~1I ~ I~UP i ~1I11311iiB 011111l'Ul111li IU illll ~ E] t3 19~ n ~ 1'lll1 ; 'idl ~ Ul'! In III Iii III !'P, ~ II i' i i ii" ii IllP.!1 I ~ I" III ~ I I II " I II I ! g ~I ,I II I~ III~!I Iii , ~ Ii ~ I , , i 1:- I f II -I '11 ~ I B .11 II 1.11 !dl II III I '111 mil " ..... ... II ~ I In i'" mil II in a II I' L.i::ril Ill. SITE PLAN, PROJECT INFO .-- -.-.- DUPLEX ..,....a:. IllllEM,Cll_ I'IL"__ ....,_.,. ~ ~- ALFARO INVESTMENTS RILEY ST. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 ACENDA ITEM NO. PACE I ~ ..... - ~ L ~ !o ! ! : ~ t ~ ~ ~ il~j!! ~ r~~ . ;Jl t ! ~ ~ ! t ~ l ~ t Liili~::;;i1! ... "';,,', . -.... -. + ~ +....... ..,....ct .-.c:a_ M."__ ....'_1171 ,j, _~ ~-A ALFARO INVESTMENTS RILEY ST. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 vO. :9AGE ~ b OF FLOOR PLAN ~~ ~~ i~ ;J! ~ ~ I , - ~.... .... : , ~ l 8 , ~ ~ o i ;I~i~ II ill ~ I 1;2!' IIIU Ii 11111.1 t~1 ~ II 1.1111 Iii CP ,d ~ I i ~ I Ii ! L:.-_ ROOF PLAN -. +........ +..... .., __ cr. ..... ..._ ......__ ..'_1171 . _~ .....-A L 1I. -4> il - - ,Iail ... ... II. I t UR -/ ~ .lli:lill~la :. xl. I~III , ~; '.1 III, I ,I ALFARO INVESTMENTS I RILEY ST. LAKE ELlefR01:e'l~1f40. .PAGE I I~II Ibl ......; ~ ~ ......; ::I . i ~ ..... -H~ ~ i m~ ~.~ m r m -< Iii . ~ (J) ~ 12 -i -f -< -- r 2 m . Hn .' ~~ m r m ~ -f 2 L:.... _ ELEVATIONS -. + -. +...... ........ cr. ~ ClIl._ ......__ PMtI1_t171 ... ~ IIIIl fHH'''HI'Hl'qf ~ n l' t l' ~ ..0 Ilill!ll!llll iillllllllll ~ ~ i 1111' E "IllS ~, II ~!lln5 i I &11 i II ~;i Ii 5 ~I ~ I I II II !I!I Ii .I II Ii I- I I ~ _I ....,. , ' ,Ih"'r"ri ' , IJ:IllJ , , '0,' e-II ' ' -:1111,,8, , I~l, : f8E " HE ..." ..... ALFARO INVESTMENTS I RILEY ST, LAKE EL~e~i1T~ii~o. PAGE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DA TE: AUGUST 15, 2006 PREPARED BY: MATTHEW C. HARRIS, SENIOR PLANNER PROJECT TITLE: THE VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE SPECIFIC PLAN APPLICANT: CLASSIC PACIFIC C/O ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES. (ATTN: SANDY CHANDLER), 3788 McCRAY STREET, RIVERSIDE CA 92506. OWNER: TOMLINSON & SONS PROJECT REQUEST · Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05 · Specific Plan No. 2005-01 · Zone Change No. 2005-01 · Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267 · Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-21 · Residential Design Review No. 2005-09 PROJECT LOCATION The approximately twenty (20) acre project site is located at the northwest comer of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive, Assessor Parcel Number(S) 379-050-006 and 034. ACENOA \tEM NO. 5 PACE_ t OF _;> b PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: "VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Project Site Vacant Commercial Park (CP) North Commercial Commercial Park (CP County Unincor orated Commercial Park (CP High Density Res. (R-3), Med. Density Res. (R-2), Low Densi Res. (R-l) South Residential East Vacant/Mobile Home West Apartments/Vacant BACKGROUND Future Specific Plan "P" Future Specific Plan "P" County Unincor orated Future Specific Plan "1" Future Specific Plan "P" During the processing of the subject applications staff worked diligently with the applicant to achieve a variety of refinements to the proposed site plan and building architecture including a pedestrian connection between interior streets, decorative street light fixtures and mailbox structures, 360-degree building architecture and materials, additional recessed windows and a minimum of two (2) rear roof lines. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project involves the City of Lake Elsinore's adoption of The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan, an infill residential project on an approximately twenty (20) acre site. The proposed community will feature 146 attached single-family condominium residences within thirty-seven (37) separate detached buildings consisting primarily of four (4) attached units each. A community recreation facility and recreational vehicle storage area is also proposed onsite. AGENDA ITEM S P AGE .a.. OF 51 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: "VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN Specific Plan The proposed Specific Plan document has been designed for attached single-family residential products only. The design guidelines and development standards contained in the Specific Plan provide sufficient guidance and direction to ensure that all development within the Specific Plan area will be visually and architecturally pleasing. No General Plan Amendment is required in association with this development given that the project site currently has a General Plan Designation of Future Specific Plan Area "P". Zone Change Considering the proposed Specific Plan, the applicant is also proposing to change the zoning designation of the subject property from Commercial Park (CP) to Medium Density Residential (R-2) which would allow for attached residential development subject to the development standards proposed within the Specific Plan. Conditional Use Permit Pursuant to Section 17.30.020 (Permits Required) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the establishment of the subject condominium project. As allowed in the LEMC, the Planning Commission is empowered to grant and to deny applications for Conditional Use Permits and to impose reasonable conditions upon the granting of Conditional Use Permits. Tentative Condominium Map The applicant requests approval to establish a proposed residential condominium community. Condominium projects are defined as "subdivisions" pursuant to Section 66424 of the California Subdivision Map Act (CSMA). Consequently, this project requires Planning Commission and City Council consideration pursuant to the requirements of Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). The condominium concept would allow the applicant the ability to offer individual dwelling units for sale as defined by the Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267, AGENDA ITEM 5 PAGE 2- OF :5:8 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: "VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN while sharing common interest, ownership and maintenance responsibilities within the common areas. These common areas entail a swimming pool/recreational facility, common walls and fences, aisle-ways, streets, pavement, minor accessory structures such as monument signs, mail boxes, landscaped areas, and onsite underground and above ground utility infrastructure improvements necessary to service and support the residential community. Residential Design Review The applicant has submitted the following plans for the proposed project: (1) building elevations and floor plans for the proposed production units; (2) site and landscaping plans for the entire project site; (3) preliminary plotting plans; (4) recreational facility plans; (5) fence and wall plans. Community Layout/Siting The project site will be accessed via two (2) gated entries off of Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue respectively. Proposed product entries and attached garages will front onto private driveways or motor courts. Each unit will have its own private fenced back yard. In addition, two (2) enclosed garages will be provided per unit. The recreation facility has been sited at the center of the subject property so as to achieve easy access to all residents. Proposed Residential Units Classic Pacific is proposing four (4) different attached single-family home products. The dwellings are proposed as two and three bedroom plan types ranging in size from 1,231 square feet thru 1,848 square feet in size. The products will primarily be provided in four (4) unit buildings with two (2) of the units having a single story and the remaining units having two stories. Architecture, Materials & Colors In an effort to achieve architectural variety, the applicant is proposing to utilize a contemporary interpretation ofthree (3) different architectural styles including Spanish Colonial, Craftsman and Tuscan style residences. A single architectural style will be utilized on each of the thirty-seven (37) separate buildings within the community. All AGENDA ITEM 5 PAGE~OF3] PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: "VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE SPECIFIC PLAN the buildings will receive enhanced four-sided architectural features regardless of view orientation. Materials are to include concrete "s" tile or concrete shingle roofs, white, off-white or pastel colors with a smooth trowled or mottled stucco finish, decorative stone or wood accents, shutters, curved arches, decorative iron work and siding are treatments are all proposed per each specific style. Recreational Amenities A Mediterranean style recreational facility will be provided in the center of the community. The facility will consist of a swimming pool, spa, restrooms and shower facility to be utilized by community residents and their guests. In addition to the recreational facility, an active turf area and passive park. An approximately 13-space screened recreational vehicle storage area will also be provided onsite. Landscaping Decorative monumentation walls, gates and paving will be provided at both entrances into the project. Moreover, specimen trees including 36" and 48" box size trees will be utilized at the entrances, augmented by a variety of flowering shrubs. A decorative sound wall will be erected along the Highway 74 frontage. A four-foot wide landscaped planter will occur outside both the Highway 74 and Grand Avenue walls behind the sidewalk. Street trees will be planted thirty-feet on center and consist of24" box size Strawberry and Laurel Cherry trees along with Euonymus shrubs. Plantings within the interior of the site will be achieved in front of residential buildings and along street side and rear yard situations. In addition, planter pockets will be used between motorcourts and building foundations to soften the hardscape. Eight (8) different varieties of trees and twelve (12) different varieties of shrubs will be utilized within the interior of the site. Decorative street and parking lot lighting will be erected throughout the site along with architecturally treated common mailbox structures. Decorative stucco walls with pilasters will be utilized within the interior of the site along street and side yards. ANALYSIS Specific Plan &Zone Chan2e The project site is currently designated Future Specific Plan Area "P" in the Lake AGENDA ITEM S PAGES OF~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: "VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE SPECIFIC PLAN Elsinore General Plan. Future Specific Plan Area "P" allows for a range of residential development types induding single- family and multi - family residential when access is feasible along Riverside Drive. A total of 225 dwelling units are permitted in association with the proposed Medium Density Residential zoning designation which allows for a maximum of 12 dwelling units per acre. A total of 146 dwelling units (7.4 units per acre) are proposed which is well below the maximum allowed density. Tentative Condominium Map Primary concerns associated with condominium projects are the establishment of appropriate mechanisms to ensure the successful and consistent aesthetic appearance of residential complexes. Moreover, the establishment of unmistakable rules and boundaries or covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&R' s) for ownership, interest, and maintenance responsibilities of common areas as well as individual areas within the units sold will be required. The establishment of the CC&R's, corroborating each of these elements, will be recorded against the project as a condition of approval. Additionally, a homeowner's association must be established prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first dwelling unit. The HOA will be empowered to administer and enforce the various elements of the CC&R's. To accomplish this, homeowner's associations in most cases will establish monthly fees that cover aspects such as landscape maintenance, parking lot maintenance and utility infrastructure improvements. Likewise, architectural design committees are often established to guarantee consistent design improvement within complexes. The project has been conditioned to require that the applicant submit a copy of the proposed CC&R's to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to recording. Moreover, pursuant to Section 17.30.040 (Documents Required) of the LEMC, staff has added a condition of approval which will require that a homeowner's association be established prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first dwelling unit. Conditional Use Permit In compliance with Chapter 17.30 (Condominiums and Condominium Conversions) of the LEMC the applicant has filed a request for a Conditional Use Permit. This request for a conditional use permit is consistent with the findings and requirements set forth in Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the LEMC which states that: AGENDA J,TEM 2 PAGE--'='- OF~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: "VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE SPECIFIC PLAN The City realizes that certain uses have operational characteristics that, depending upon the location and design of the use, may have the potential to negatively impact adjoining properties, businesses, or residents. Said uses therefore require a more comprehensive review and approval procedure, including the ability to condition the project, in order to mitigate any detrimental impact. In order to achieve this, the Planning Commission is empowered to grant and to deny applications for Conditional Use Permits and to impose reasonable conditions upon granting of Conditional Use Permits. Considering the potential ramification to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the community, as admonished, staffhas paid particular attention to specific technicalities related to the development of the proposed use. These details included traffic impacts, local street circulation, internal vehicular and pedestrian circulation, landscape buffering, private common area amenities (i.e. swimming pool, spa, tot lots and picnic areas), architectural compatibility and related development standards. Further, pursuant to Section 17.30.040 of the LEMC, the applicant has been conditioned to convey the common open spaces and recreation facilities to a homeowner's association (HOA). In compliance, the applicant has been conditioned to submit a declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&R's), to be reviewed by the City Attorney and reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director, which will govern the association. Correspondingly, the applicant has been conditioned to establish said homeowner's association prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first dwelling unit. Residential Design Review Site Layout and Design Staff has determined that the proposed project conforms to all applicable development standards as outlined in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan including setbacks, building height, building separation and open space requirements. Moreover, in accordance with the Specific Plan proposed each dwelling unit has an associated enclosed two car garage. A total of one-hundred and six (106) guest parking spaces have also been provided onsite. AGENDA ITEM 5 p AGE ~ OFSi PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: "VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN Architecture Staff has determined that the three (3) proposed architectural styles and associated architectural elements are consistent with the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan Design Guidelines. The applicant has incorporated additional building articulation, ornamental features and a variety of rooflines which serve to provide interest. Noise Attenuation Portions of residential units fronting Riverside Drive (Hwy. 74) are located within the 65 decibel exterior noise contour. An Acoustical Study was prepared for the project which determined that a six-foot (6') tall sound wall must be constructed along the roadway to mitigate the noise impact. In addition, plexiglass panels will be installed around upstairs rear decks on the units that back onto Riverside Drive. Colors and Materials The color and materials proposed for this project meets the intent of the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan, in that the colors and materials proposed, will serve to produce diversity and enhance the architectural effects. Additionally, the colors and materials proposed will assist in blending the architecture into the existing landscape. Landscaping The landscape design of the proposed residential community meets the requirements set forth within the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan. The proposed landscaping and open spaces have formed a community structure comprised of individual components which significantly contribute to a memorable sense of place for the area. Further, the applicant has also provided a landscape strip along both the Riverside Drive and Grand Avenue frontages. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05 has been prepared pursuant to Article 6 (Negative Declaration Process and Section 15070 (Decision to Prepare and Negative or Mitigated Negative Declaration) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on staffs evaluation, the proposed project will not result in a AGENDAJ:rEM 5...- PAGEjd OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: "VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE SPECIFIC PLAN significant effect on the environment. Further, pursuant to Section 15073 (Public Review of a Proposed Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration), the intended Mitigated Negative Declaration was submitted to the State Clearinghouse. The 30-day review period was completed on August 7,2006. Four affected agencies have commented on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration including the State Department of Toxic Substances Control, Southern California Gas Company, Riverside County Flood Control and the State American Heritage Commission. These agency letters and staffs response to their comments is attached (See Attachment 7). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the following Resolutions; Resolution No. 2006-_ recommending to the City Council adoption of MSHCP Consistency Findings; Resolution No. 2006-_ recommending to the City Council adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05, Resolution No. 2006- recommending City Council approval of Zone Change No. ZC 2005-01, Resolution No. 2006-_ recommending City Council approval of Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267, Resolution No. 2006-_ approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-21 and Resolution No. 2006-_ recommending to the City Council approval of Residential Design Review No. 2005-09; based on the following Findings, Exhibits and attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS- MSHCP CONSISTENCY 1. The proposed project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City must make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval. The proposed project requires a number of discretionary approvals from the City, including CEQA review. Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Resolution, the project has been reviewed for MSHCP consistency, including consistency with "Other Plan Requirements. " These include the Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines (MSHCP, ~ 6.1.2), Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines (MSHCP, ~ 6.1.3), Additional Survey Needs and Procedures (MSHCP, ~ 6.3.2), Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines (MSHCP, ~ 6.1.4), Vegetation Mapping (MSHCP, ~ 6.3.1) Requirements, Fuels Management Guidelines (MSHCP, ~ 6.4), and payment of the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee (MSHCP Ordinance, ~ 4). AGENDAJTEM S PAGE_\ OF 5~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: "VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE SPECIFIC PLAN 2. The proposed project is subject to the City's LEAP and the County's Joint Project Review processes. The project site is within the MSHCP Lake Elsinore Area Plan. However, the site does not lie within a Criteria Cell and is therefore not subject to the Joint Project Review Process. However, the project is still required to demonstrate compliance with the other MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements. " The Project is in compliance with these requirements as described below. 3. The proposed project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools Guidelines. No riparian, riverine, vernal pool/fairy shrimp habitat or other aquatic resources were identified on the proposed project site. Some sparse elements of riparian scrub occur in several stands within Parcel 1, including species of mulefat, red willow, and tamarisk. However, this vegetation is not associated with any natural drainage feature, and is most likely supported by broken irrigation lines or other subsurface sources of water. As a result, no further MSHCP analysis or conservation measures are required. The proposed project is therefore consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP. 4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines. The project site does notfall within any Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Areas. Neither a habitat assessment nor further focused surveys are requiredfor the proposed project. Therefore, Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines as setforth in Section 6.1.3 of the MSHCP are not applicable to the proposed project. 5. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. The MSHCP only requires additional surveys for certain species if the project is located in Criteria Area Species Survey Areas, Amphibian Species Survey Areas, Burrowing Owl Survey Areas, and Mammal Species Survey Areas of the MSHCP. The project site is located outside of any Critical Area Species Survey AGENDA ITEM l PAGEJO OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: "VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE SPECIFIC PLAN Areas. Therefore, it can be concluded that the provisions as set forth in Section 6.3.2 of the MSHCP are not applicable to the proposed project. 6. The proposed project is consistent with the UrbanlWildlands Interface Guidelines. The project site is not within or adjacent to any MSHCP criteria or conservation areas. Therefore, the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.1.4 in the MSHCP are not applicable to the proposed project. No additional mitigation measures or conditions of approval are required. 7. The proposed project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements. The project site currently consists primarily of vacant land with one unoccupied residence. There were no resources located on the project site requiring mapping as setforth in Section 6.3.1 of the MSHCP. 8. The proposed project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines. The project site is not within or adjacent to any MSHCP criteria or conservation areas. Therefore, the Fuels Management Guidelines as setforth in Section 6.4 of the MSHCP are not applicable to the proposed project. No additional mitigation measures or conditions of approval are required. 9. The proposed project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. As a condition of approval, the project will be required to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee at the time of issuance of building permits. 10. The proposed project is consistent with the MSHCP. The proposed project complies and is consistent with all of the required procedures, policies, and guidelines of the City's MSHCP Resolution and the MSHCP. The applicant has made revisions to the project or has agreed to specific conditions, which would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects of the project to a point where no significant effects would occur. AGENDA ITEM .b PAGE \\ OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: "VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE SPECIFIC PLAN FINDINGS- MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1. Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before a proposed mitigated negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur. The applicant has made revisions to the project or has agreed to specific conditions which would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects of the project to a level where no significant effects would occur. 2. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the agency, that the project as revised may have significant effect on the environment. Pursuant to the evidence received, and in the light of the whole record presented, the project will not have a significant effect on the environment considering the applicable Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring Program. 3. Mitigation measures have been required to ensure all potentially significant impacts are reduced to levels of insignificance. Mitigation measures have been required which will reduce significant environmental impacts to the level of "less than significant". FINDINGS-SPECIFIC PLAN & REZONING 1. The location and design of the proposed development shall be consistent with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan and with any other applicable plan or policies adopted by the City. The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan meets the City's Specific Plan criteria for content and required implementation of the General Plan established by Section 65450 et seq. of the California Government Code and LEMC Section 17.99. Accordingly, the proposed Specific Plan is in concurrence with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. Policy 1.1.1 states that the City shall encourage planned residential and/or planned unit developments, through the use of specific plans and zoning that promote innovative site design,; preserve natural features, and provide open space, recreational facilities, and other amenities and facilities. In compliance with this policy of the City's General Plan, the applicant is proposing a well designed community that has provided a common recreation area that includes a pool, spa, AGENDA ITEM 5 PAGE~ 0FS] PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: "VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE SPECIFIC PLAN and common gathering places for the residents. 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City. The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan will not be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working near the project area or within the City, nor will it be injurious to property or improvements in the project area or within the City. In addition, all applicable City departments and agencies have been afforded the opportunity to review the Specific Plan. Comments received from these departments and agencies have been incorporated as conditions related to installation and maintenance of landscaping, street dedications, regulations of points of vehicular ingress and egress and control of potential nuisances, so as to eliminate any negative impacts to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or the City. 3. The site for the proposed Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all the subdivisions, yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required by Title 17 of the LEMC. The proposed Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby strengthening and enhancing the immediate residential area. Those issues, standards and guidelines not addressed in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan will revert to the City Municipal and Zoning Codes in effect at the time future development is proposed. Further, the project as proposed, will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects, in that the proposed use has been reviewed to ensure adequate provision ofscreeningfrom the public rights-of-way or adjacent properties. Additionally, the buildings have been sited in a "clustering" design, which has provided both privacy and a sense of community. A significant amount of landscaping has been incorporated into the design of the project which has added to the atmosphere of the project. 4. This project complies with the design directives contained in Chapter 17.99 and all other applicable provisions of the LEMC. AGENDA ITEM ~ PAGE~()F3) PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: "VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE SPECIFIC PLAN The proposed project is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the project will construct single-family detached units in accordance with appropriate development and design standards contained in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan. The project creates interest and varying vistas as a person moves along the streets within the project. The project also complements the quality of existing neighboring development and will continue to provide visually-pleasing design and architecture within the immediate area. S. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use. The proposed Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan has been reviewed as to its relation to the width and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated. The City has adequately evaluated the potential impacts associated with the proposed uses prior to its approval and has conditioned the project to be served by roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car, truck, transit, and bicycle. 6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.99 of the LEMC have been incorporated into the approval of the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan to insure that the project continues in a manner envisioned by these findings. Pursuant to LEMC Section 17.99 (Specific Plan Approval, Denial and Modifications), the proposed Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission. FINDINGS- TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). The project as designed assists in achieving the development of a well-balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses (GOAL 1.0, Land Use Element) as well as provide decent housing opportunities and a satisfying living environment for residents of Lake Elsinore (GOAL 1.0, Housing Element). 2. The effects this project is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and AGENDA ITEM 5 PAGE\4 OF Sl PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: "VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE SPECIFIC PLAN environmental resources have been considered and balanced. Considering the effects this project is likely to have upon the needs of the region a condition of approval was implemented which would require the applicant to either construct affordable housing or pay an in lieu fee calculated to provide sufficient funds to underwrite the long-term affordability of an equivalent number of affordable dwelling units constructed or substantially rehabilitated on other sites within the City's redevelopment project areas. 3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant environmental impact. The project has been adequately conditioned by all applicable departments and agencies and will not therefore result in any significant environmental impacts. FINDINGS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. In order to achieve a well balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses, staff has thoroughly evaluated the land use compatibility, noise, traffic and other environmental hazards related to the proposed Conditional Use Permit. Accordingly, the proposed land use is in concurrence with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City. In accord with the purposes of the LEMC Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits), the City realized that the proposed condominium use may have a potential to negatively impact the welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood or the City. However, all applicable City departments and AGENDA ITEM 5 PAGES5 OF 2l PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: "VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE SPECIFIC PLAN agencies have been afforded the opportunity to review the use permit and their comments have been addressed in the conditions of approval attached to the staff report for this project. Conditions related to installation and maintenance of landscaping, street dedications, regulations ofpoints of vehicular ingress and egress and control of potential nuisances, so as to eliminate any negative impacts to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or the City. 3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required by The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and Title 17 of the LEMC. The proposed condominium use has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby strengthening and enhancing the immediate residential area. Further, the project as proposed, will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects, in that the condominium community has been reviewed to ensure adequate provision of screeningfrom the public rights-of-way or adjacent properties. 4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use. The proposed condominium use has been reviewed in relation to the width and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated. The City has adequately evaluated the potential impacts associated with the proposed condominium community prior to its approval and has conditioned the project to be served by roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car, truck, transit, and bicycle. S. In approving the subj ect use, there will be no adverse affect on abutting property or the permitted and normal use thereof. The proposed use has been thoroughly reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City departments and outside agencies, eliminating the potential for any and all adverse effects on the abutting property. 6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to LEMC Section 17.74.50 have been incorporated into the approval ofthe Conditional Use Permit to insure that AGENDA ITEM 5 PAGE_'{, OF~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: "VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN the use continues in a manner envisioned by these findings for the term of the use. Pursuant to LEMC Section 17.74.050 (Action of the Planning Commission), the condominium community has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission. FINDINGS- RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the intended General Plan, Village of Lakeshore Specific Plan and the zoning district in which the project will be located. The proposed Residential Design Review for a proposed attached single-family condominium community complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan designation for this area, which is Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan. The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan is intended for a wide range of residential development types including attached single-family units. In addition, the designation permits a maximum density of twelve (12) dwelling units per acre. The project proposes 7.4 dwelling units per acre overall. The approval of this attached single-family condominium community will assist in achieving the development of a well balanced and functional mix of residential, limited commercial, limited industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses by providing additional housing within the City of Lake Elsinore, as well as encouraging the development and maintenance of a broad range of housing types for all income groups and age categories. It should be noted that the proposed dwelling units will incorporate "Spanish Colonial, Craftsman and Tuscan" style architecture that will provide a well rounded design while maintaining the desirable rural characteristics and base framework to achieve quality and compatibility in the physical design of the developing portions of the City. 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in LEMC Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the LEMC. The proposed Residential Design Review is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the project has provided a variety of setback, open space and landscape standards along with safe and efficient onsite vehicular circulation. Further, the project as proposed will complement the AGENDA ITEM 5 PAGE) l OF S..8. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: "VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE SPECIFIC PLAN quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non- detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects in that the applicant is providing a three different architectural styles which include: 360- degree architectural articulation pursuant to the "Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan", Arched elements, decorative ornamental features per the specific architectural style, and concrete tile roofs. In addition, the applicant is providing a variety of colors and materials. 3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Section 15070, a mitigated negative declaration was prepared for this project. The mitigation contained in the mitigated negative declaration, mitigation monitoring plan, and the conditions of approval for the project adequately mitigate all of the potentially significant environmental impacts identified in the initial study to a level of insignificance. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to LEMC Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission), the proposed Residential Design Review has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission. The proposed project has also been conditioned to comply with the LEMC. For example, Condition of Approval Number Seven (#7) has been included which states that all site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations, with revision noted herein. The Applicant shall meet all required setbacks and development standards pursuant to the Medium Density development standards as mandated in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan. PREPARED BY: MATTHEW C. HARRIS, SENIOR PLANNER APPROVED BY: ~ ~j--- 'fura Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM .5.- PAGE \ ~ _ OF .5..:8 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 15, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: "VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE SPECIFIC PLAN ATTACHMENTS: 1. LOCATION MAP 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIONS 3. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 4. SPECIFIC PLAN 5. TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 6. EXPANDED INITIAL STUDYIMITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 7. DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 8. AFFECTED AGENCY RESPONSE TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND STAFF'S RESPONSE TO COMMENTS 9. EXHIBITS . REDUCTIONS (8 'l2 xII) Exhibit A Site Plan Exhibit B Floor Plan Exhibit C Building Elevations Exhibit F Landscaping Plan · FULL SIZE PLAN SET AGENDA ITEM 5 PAGE_\~>'.PF S1 VICINITY MAP THE VILLAGES AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2005-01, ZONE CHANGE 2005-01, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 33267 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-21 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-09 ---1 PLANNING COMMISSION . i. ';).0 5..~ --~]--- .t>"r:"~ r ....~ r',1'"" RESOLUTION NO. 2006- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE MULTI-SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) FOR THE PROJECTS KNOWN AS VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-1 ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-01, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 33267 AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-09, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRAND AVENUE AND RIVERSIDE DRIVE WHEREAS, Classic Pacific C/O Albert A Webb. has submitted applications for Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan No. 2005-1, Zone Change No. 2005-01, Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267, Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-21 and Residential Design Review No. 2005-09, located at the northwest comer of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive; and WHEREAS, these applications comprise the "project" as defined by California Public Resources Code Section 21065, which is defined as an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and which includes the issuance to a person of a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies; and WHEREAS, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05 (State Clearinghouse No. 2006017027) has been prepared to evaluate environmental impacts resulting with the project; and WHEREAS, public notice of said project has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on August 15, 2006. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: ACENOA ITEM NO. S; PACE ~ \ OF S <g PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE20F5 SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed applications and their consistency with the MSHCP prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council adopt Findings of Consistency with the MSHCP. SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning laws, the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and the MSHCP, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for MSHCP consistency: MSHCP CONSISTENCY FINDINGS 1. The proposed project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City must make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval. The proposed project requires a number of discretionary approvals from the City, including CEQA review. Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Resolution, the project has been reviewed for MSHCP consistency, including consistency with "Other Plan Requirements. " These include the Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines (MSHCP, ~ 6.1.2), Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines (MSHCP, ~ 6.1.3), Additional Survey Needs and Procedures (MSHCP, ~ 6.3.2), Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines (MSHCP, ~ 6.1.4), Vegetation Mapping (MSHCP, ~ 6.3.1) Requirements, Fuels Management Guidelines (MSHCP, ~ 6.4), and payment of the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee (MSHCP Ordinance, ~ 4). 2. The proposed project is subject to the City's LEAP and the County's Joint Project Review processes. The project site is within the MSHCP Lake Elsinore Area Plan. However, the site does not lie within a Criteria Cell and is therefore not subject to the Joint Project Review Process. However, the project is still required to demonstrate compliance with the other MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements." The Project is in compliance with these requirements as described below. 3. The proposed project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and V emal Pools Guidelines. No riparian, riverine, vernal pool/fairy shrimp habitat or other aquatic resources were identified on the proposed project site. Some sparse ACENDA ITEM rro. 5 PACE cl ~ OF S~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE30F5 elements of riparian scrub occur in several stands within Parcell, including species of mulefat, red willow, and tamarisk. However, this vegetation is not associated with any natural drainage feature, and is most likely supported by broken irrigation lines or other subsurface sources of water. As a result, no further MSHCP analysis or conservation measures are required. The proposed project is therefore consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP. 4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines. The project site does not fall within any Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Areas. Neither a habitat assessment nor further focused surveys are required for the proposed project. Therefore, Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.1.3 of the MSHCP are not applicable to the proposed project. 5. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. The MSHCP only requires additional surveys for certain species if the project is located in Criteria Area Species Survey Areas, Amphibian Species Survey Areas, Burrowing Owl Survey Areas, and Mammal Species Survey Areas of the MSHCP. The project site is located outside of any Critical Area Species Survey Areas. Therefore, it can be concluded that the provisions as set forth in Section 6.3.2 of the MSHCP are not applicable to the proposed project. 6. The proposed project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines. The project site is not within or adjacent to any MSHCP criteria or conservation areas. Therefore, the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.1.4 in the MSHCP are not applicable to the proposed project. No additional mitigation measures or conditions of approval are required. ACENDA iTEM NO. 5 PAOE ~~.OF S~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE40F5 7. The proposed project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements. The project site currently consists primarily of vacant land with one unoccupied residence. There were no resources located on the project site requiring mapping as setforth in Section 6.3.1 of the MSHCP. 8. The proposed project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines. The project site is not within or adjacent to any MSHCP criteria or conservation areas. Therefore, the Fuels Management Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.4 of the MSHCP are not applicable to the proposed project. No additional mitigation measures or conditions of approval are required. 9. The proposed project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. As a condition of approval, the project will be required to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee at the time of issuance of building permits. IO.The proposed project is consistent with the MSHCP. The proposed project complies and is consistent with all of the required procedures, policies, and guidelines of the City's MSHCP Resolution and the MSHCP. The applicant has made revisions to the project or has agreed to specific conditions, which would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects of the project to a point where no significant effects would occur. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. ACENDA ITEM NO. S PACE ~4 OF So PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE50F5 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this first day of August, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA IttM NO. 5 PAGE ,~.5 OF 5 ~ r RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_ RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADDOPTION OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-05 FOR "THE VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE" A RESIDENTIAL SPECIFIC PLAN TO BE LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRAND AVENUE AND RIVERSIDE DRIVE (APNs: 379-050-006 & 034) WHEREAS, Classic Pacific C/O Albert A. Webb filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting the approval of Specific Plan No. 2005-01, Zone Change No. 2005-01, Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-21 and Residential Design Review No. 2005-09, for the establishment of a residential condominium community; and WHEREAS, the "Village at Lakeshore" is defined as a "project" by California Public Resources Code Section 21065, which is defined as an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and which includes the issuance to a person of a lease, permit license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies; and WHEREAS, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05 has been prepared to evaluate environmental impacts resulting with the project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for approving mitigated negative declarations; and WHEREAS, public notice of said applications has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on August 15,2006. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05 (State Clearinghouse No. ACENDA 'TEM NO. 5 PAce~OF 5 R PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE20F3 2006071027) prior to making a decision to recommend adoption to the City Council. The Planning Commission finds and determines that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05 is adequate and prepared pursuant to the Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Sections 15000 et seq. (the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines) which analyzes environmental effects of the project, based upon the following findings and determinations. SECTION 2. That in accordance with State law and the LEMC, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05: 1. Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before a proposed mitigated negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur. The applicant has made revisions to the project or has agreed to specific conditions which would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects of the project to a level where no significant effects would occur. 2. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the agency, that the project as revised may have significant effect on the environment. Pursuant to the evidence received, and in the light of the whole record presented, the project will not have a significant effect on the environment considering the applicable Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring Program. 3. Mitigation measures have been required to ensure all potentially significant impacts are reduced to levels of insignificance. Mitigation measures have been required which will reduce significant environmental impacts to the level of "less than significant ". SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. ACENDA lTall NO. .5 PACE al _OF ~D . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_ PAGE30F3 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of August, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA'TEM NO. 5 PACE_~ OF 50 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_ RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-01 CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRAND AVENUE AND RIVERSIDE DRIVE FROM (CP) COMMERCIAL PARK TO THE VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE SPECIFIC PLAN UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE WHEREAS, Classic Pacific C/O Albert A. Webb submitted an application for the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan. The application changes the zoning designation from (CP) Commercial Park to The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan. The approximately 20 acre site is located at the northwest comer of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for approval of Specific Plans; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on August 15,2006. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Specific Plan No. 2005-01 prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and change the area's zoning designation. SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of Specific Plan No. 2005-01: AGENDA rrEM NO. 5 PACE ~~ OF S)' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_ PAGE20F4 1. The location and design of the proposed development shall be consistent with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan and with any other applicable plan or policies adopted by the City. The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan meets the City's Specific Plan criteria for content and required implementation of the General Plan established by Section 65450 et seQ. of the California Government Code and LEMC Section 17.99. Accordingly, the proposed Specific Plan is in concurrence with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. Policy 1.1.1 states that the City shall encourage planned residential and/or planned unit developments, through the use of specific plans and zoning that promote innovative site design,; preserve natural features, and provide open space, recreational facilities, and other amenities and facilities. In compliance with this policy of the City's General Plan, the applicant is proposing a well designed community that has provided a common recreation area that includes a pool, spa, and common gathering places for the residents. 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City. The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan will not be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working near the project area or within the City, nor will it be injurious to property or improvements in the project area or within the City. In addition, all applicable City departments and agencies have been afforded the opportunity to review the Specific Plan. Comments received from these departments and agencies have been incorporated as conditions related to installation and maintenance of landscaping, street dedications, regulations of points of vehicular ingress and egress and control of potential nuisances, so as to eliminate any negative impacts to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or the City. 3. The site for the proposed Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all the subdivisions, yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required by Title 17 of the LEMC. The proposed Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby strengthening and AtENl)~ IltM NO. ,_..-.:2 -, PAGE '1>0 OF_._5~. ~- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE30F4 enhancing the immediate residential area. Those issues, standards and guidelines not addressed in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan will revert to the City Municipal and Zoning Codes in effect at the time future development is proposed. Further, the project as proposed, will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects, in that the proposed use has been reviewed to ensure adequate provision of screening from the public rights-ol-way or adjacent properties. Additionally, the buildings have been sited in a "clustering" design, which has provided both privacy and a sense of community. A significant amount of landscaping has been incorporated into the design of the project which has added to the atmosphere of the project. 4. This project complies with the design directives contained in Chapter 17.99 and all other applicable provisions of the LEMC. The proposed project is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the project will construct single-family detached units in accordance with appropriate development and design standards contained in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan. The project creates interest and varying vistas as a person moves along the streets within the project. The project also complements the quality of existing neighboring development and will continue to provide visually-pleasing design and architecture within the immediate area. 5. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use. The proposed Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan has been reviewed as to its relation to the width and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated. The City has adequately evaluated the potential impacts associated with the proposed uses prior to its approval and has conditioned the project to be served by roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car, truck, transit, and bicycle. 6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.99 of the LEMC have been incorporated into the approval of the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan to insure that the project continues in a manner envisioned by these findings. AGENDA ITEM NO. S PACE-2 '~_OF s ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE40F4 Pursuant to LEMC Section 17.99 (Specific Plan Approval, Denial and Modifications), the proposed Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of August, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 PACE ~ ~ OF 5 ~ RESOLUTION NO. 2006- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 33267 FOR "VILLAGES AT LAKE SHORE" A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM COMMUNITY TO BE LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRAND AVENUE AND RIVERSIDE DRIVE (APNs: 379-050-006 & 034) WHEREAS, Classic Pacific C/O Albert A. Webb filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting the approval of Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267 for the establishment of a residential condominium community; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of recommending approval of Tentative Condominium Maps for residential projects; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on August 15,2006. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267 and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and determines that this project is consistent with Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), Section(s) 66424 and 66427 of the California Government Code. SECTION 2. That in accordance with Government Code Sections 66424 and 66427 and LEMC Title 16 "Subdivisions", the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of the Tentative Condominium Map: 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). ACENDA ITEM NO. 5 PACE 3~ OF 5 ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_ PAGE20F3 The project as designed assists in achieving the development of a well- balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses (GOAL 1.0, Land Use Element) as well as provide decent housing opportunities and a satisfying living environment for residents of Lake Elsinore (GOAL 1.0, Housing Element). 2. The effects this project is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources have been considered and balanced. Considering the effects this project is likely to have upon the needs of the region a condition of approval was implemented which would require the applicant to either construct affordable housing or pay an in lieu fee calculated to provide sufficient funds to underwrite the long-term affordability of an equivalent number of affordable dwelling units constructed or substantially rehabilitated on other sites within the City's redevelopment project areas. 3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant environmental impact. The project has been adequately conditioned by all applicable departments and agencies and will not therefore result in any significant environmental impacts. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of August, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ACENOA JT!'M NO. PArI'" J 4 5 ~~-s1"~'- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_ PAGE30F3 Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA tTEM NO. 5 PAGE 3 5 OF S ~ RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_ RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-21 FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF "THE VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE SPECIFIC PLAN" A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM COMMUNITY TO BE LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRAND AVENUE AND RIVERSIDE DRIVE (APNs: 379-050-006 & 034) WHEREAS, Classic Pacific C/O Albert A. Webb filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-21, for the establishment of a residential condominium community; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Permit requests for residential projects; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on August 15,2006. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-21 and has found it acceptable. SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the Planning Commission makes the following findings for approval of Condition Use Permit 2005-21: 1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. In order to achieve a well balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses, staff has thoroughly evaluated the land use compatibility, noise, traffic and AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 PACE ~'~ OF 5 ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE20F3 - other environmental hazards related to the proposed Conditional Use Permit. Accordingly, the proposed land use is in concurrence with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City. In accord with the purposes of the LEMC Chapter 17. 74 (Conditional Use Permits), the City realized that the proposed condominium use may have a potential to negatively impact the welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood or the City. However, all applicable City departments and agencies have been afforded the opportunity to review the use permit and their comments have been addressed in the conditions of approval attached to the staff report for this project. Conditions related to installation and maintenance of landscaping, street dedications, regulations of points of vehicular ingress and egress and control of potential nuisances, so as to eliminate any negative impacts to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or the City. 3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required by The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and Title 17 of the LEMC. The proposed condominium use has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby strengthening and enhancing the immediate residential area. Further, the project as proposed, will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects, in that the condominium community has been reviewed to ensure adequate provision of screening from the public rights-ol-way or adjacent properties. 4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use. The proposed condominium use has been reviewed in relation to the width and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 PACE 3l,OF S D PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE30F3 - generated. The City has adequately evaluated the potential impacts associated with the proposed condominium community prior to its approval and has conditioned the project to be served by roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car, truck, transit, and bicycle. 5. In approving the subject use, there will be no adverse affect on abutting property or the permitted and normal use thereof. The proposed use has been thoroughly reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City departments and outside agencies, eliminating the potential for any and all adverse effects on the abutting property. 6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to LEMC Section 17.74.50 have been incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Permit to insure that the use continues in a manner envisioned by these findings for the term of the use. Pursuant to LEMC Section 17.74.050 (Action of the Planning Commission), the condominium community has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of August, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development ACENOA InM NO. S PACE ')B Of s ~ RESOLUTION NO. 2006- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-09 FOR "THE VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE SPECIFIC PLAN" BY CLASSIC PACIFIC, FOR 146 ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY CONDOMINIUMS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRAND AVENUE AND RIVERSIDE DRIVE (APNs: 379-050-006 & 034) WHEREAS, Classic Pacific C/O Albert A Webb filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Residential Design Review to construct 146 attached single-family condominiums, including a private recreational facility, private park and private recreational vehicle storage area located at the northwest comer of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive pursuant to the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Chapter 17.82 (Design Review); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of recommending approval of Residential Design Review requests; and WHEREAS, notice of the Residential Design Review consideration has been given and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item on August 15,2006. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed design for the attached single-family condominium project and has found it acceptable. SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the LEMC, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of the Residential Design Review: 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the intended General Plan, Village of Lakeshore Specific Plan and the zoning S district in which the project will be located. ACENDA'TEM NO. S 'g PAGE 'Y\)F - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE20F3 The proposed Residential Design Review for a proposed attached single- family condominium community complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan designation for this area, which is Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan. The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan is intended for a wide range of residential development types including attached single-family units. In addition, the designation permits a maximum density of twelve (12) dwelling units per acre. The project proposes 7.4 dwelling units per acre overall. The approval of this attached single-family condominium community will assist in achieving the development of a well balanced and functional mix of residential, limited commercial, limited industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses by providing additional housing within the City of Lake Elsinore, as well as encouraging the development and maintenance of a broad range of housing types for all income groups and age categories. It should be noted that the proposed dwelling units will incorporate "Spanish Colonial, Craftsman and Tuscan" style architecture that will provide a well rounded design while maintaining the desirable rural characteristics and base framework to achieve quality and compatibility in the physical design of the developing portions of the City. 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in LEMC Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the LEMC. The proposed Residential Design Review is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the project has provided a variety of setback, open space and landscape standards along with safe and efficient onsite vehicular circulation. Further, the project as proposed will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects in that the applicant is providing a three different architectural styles which include: 360-degree architectural articulation pursuant to the "Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan ", Arched elements, decorative ornamental features per the specific architectural style, and concrete tile roofs. In addition, the applicant is providing a variety of colors and materials. 3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Section 15070, a mitigated negative declaration was prepared for this project. The mitigation contained in the mitigated negative declaration, mitigation monitoring plan, and the conditions of approval for the project adequately mitigate all of the ACENDA I1tM NO. S PACE ~ 0 ')f S1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE30F3 potentially significant environmental impacts identified in the initial study to a level of insignificance. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to LEMC Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission), the proposed Residential Design Review has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission. The proposed project has also been conditioned to comply with the LEMC For example, Condition of Approval Number Seven (#7) has been included which states that all site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations, with revision noted herein. The Applicant shall meet all required setbacks and development standards pursuant to the Medium Density development standards as mandated in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of August, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development ACENDA ITEM NO. 5 PAGE 4-1 OF 'S "g GENERAL 1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, and Contract Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, Contract Consultants, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the subject project, which action is bought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and/or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully with the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, or proceeding, the Applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 2. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the Riverside County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred and Fourteen Dollars ($1,314.00) to enable the City to File the Notice of Determination. Said filing fee shall be provided to the City within 48 hours of project approval. SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2004-01 & ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-01 3. The Draft Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan shall be revised to incorporate any corrections and changes required by the Planning Commission and/or City Council. A Final Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan document shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director or designee within 30 days of approval by the City Council. No permit shall be issued until the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan document and any required revisions are administratively approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 4. Future development shall comply with those standards and guidelines contained in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan document. 5. Those issues, standards, guidelines, etc. not addressed in the Village at Lakeshore ACENDA ITEM NO. 5 PAGE 4 ~_OF ~ ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROV AI.. Page 2 of 17 VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN Specific Plan will revert to the City Municipal Code and/or Zoning Code in effect at the time future projects are proposed. 6. The applicant shall participate and annex into the City of Lake Elsinore Citywide Landscaping and Street Lighting District, as appropriate. 7. The applicant shall provide all project-related onsite and offsite improvements as described in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan document. 8. The applicant shall implement those mitigation measures identified in Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-05 and its Mitigation Monitoring Program. 9. Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation and construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and shall cease at 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Construction activity shall not take place on Saturday, Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. 10.The applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department. TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 33267 11. The Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267 will expire two (2) years from date of approval unless within that period of time the CC&R's and an appropriate instrument has been filed and recorded with the County Recorder, or an extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. I2.The Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267 shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 16 unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. I3.Prior to final certificate of occupancy of Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267, the improvements specified herein and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council shall be installed, or agreements for said improvements, shall be submitted to the City for approval by the City Engineer, and all other stated conditions shall be complied with. All uncompleted improvements must be ACENDA ITEM NO. 5 PACE ~3 OF s ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROV AI.. Page 3 of 17 VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN bonded for as part of the agreements. l4.Prior to approval of the Final Map the Tentative Parcel Map shall be modified to a one lot Tentative Tract Map for condominium purposes. l5.Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall prepare and record CC&R's against the condominium complex. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director or Designee and the City Attorney. The CC&R's shall include methods of maintaining common areas, parking and drive aisle areas, landscaped areas including parkways, and methods for common maintenance of all underground, and above ground utility infrastructure improvements necessary to support the complex. In addition, the CC&R's shall establish methods to address design improvements. l6.No unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has been formed with the right to financially assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and duty to maintain, all said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. l7.Provisions to restrict parking upon other than approved and developed parking spaces shall be written into the covenants, conditions and restrictions for each proj ect. 18.Membership in the Home Owner's Association shall be mandatory for each buyer and any successive buyer. 19.Reciprocal covenants, conditions, and restrIctIons and reciprocal maintenance agreements shall be established which will cause a merging of all development phases as they are completed, and embody one (1) homeowner's associati~ with ACENDA tTEM NO. - PACE_!-t G.- _OfS~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 4 of 17 VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN common area for the total development of the subject project. 20.In the event the association or other legally responsible person(s) fail to maintain said common area in such a manner as to cause same to constitute a public nuisance, said City may, upon proper notice and hearing, institute summary abatement procedures and impose a lien for the costs of such abatement upon said common area, individual units or whole thereof as provided by law. 2l.Each unit owner shall have full access to commonly owned areas, facilities and utilities. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-21 22.Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-21 approved herein shall lapse and shall become void one (1) year following the date on which the use permit became effective, unless prior to the expiration of one year, a building permit is issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion on the site. 23.The Conditional Use Permit shall comply with the all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code; Title 17 unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 24. The Conditional Use Permit granted herein shall run with the land and shall continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the site or structure which was the subject of this approval. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-09 25.Design Review approval for Residential Project No. 2005-09 will lapse and be void unless a building permit is issued within one (1) year of the approval date. 26.Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Project, Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore to provide (a) 15% of the units constructed in the Project as affordable housing units in accordance with the requirements of Section 33413(b) (2) of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.), or (b) an alternative equivalent action as determined by the City which may include (without limitation) dedication of vacant land, construction of affordable units on another site, or payment of an in lieu fee at the ACENDA 'TEM NO. 5 PAce 4- 5 _OF So CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 5 of 17 VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPEOFIC PLAN rate of $2.00 per square foot as assessable space for each dwelling unit in the Project. For purposes of this condition, "assessable space" means all of the square footage within the perimeter of a residential structure, not including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, detached accessory structure, or similar area. The amount of the square footage within the perimeter of a residential structure shall be calculated by the building department of the City in accordance with the standard practice of the City in calculating structural perimeters. 27.All construction shall comply with these Conditions of Approval and those provisions and requirements contained in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and Municipal Code, prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy and release of utilities. 28.All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved building elevations and site plan. 29.Future site plotting and construction shall be consistent with these Conditions of Approval, those conditions approved with Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267 and those provisions and requirements contained in the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and Municipal Code, subject to approval by the Community Development Director or designee. 30.Future site plotting and construction within Tentative Condominium Map No. 33267 shall comply with the standards and requirements of the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan. Future site plotting shall be shown on precise grading plans, subject to approval by the Community Development Director or designee. 31.All weep screeds shall be a maximum three inches above any hard surface and four inches above any earth surface. 32.Any revisions to approved site plans or building elevations shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 33.Materials and colors depicted on the materials board shall be used unless modified by the Community Development Director or designee. 34.Provide a flat concrete pad or area a minimum of 3'- 0" by 7'- 0" adjacent to the dwelling for the storage of the City trash barrels. The storage pad or area shall conceal the trash barrels from public view, subject to the approval of c;the ACENDA ITEM NO. 5 D PACE ~b)F CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 6 of 17 VILLAGE AT LAKE SHORE SPECIFIC PLAN Community Development Director or designee. Precise grading plans shall identify the location of the aforementioned flat concrete pad and air conditioning units. 35.The building addresses (in numerals at least four inches high) shall be displayed near the entrance and easily visible from the front of the unit and public right-of- way. The applicant shall obtain street addresses for all production lots prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. 36. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided 30 days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineering Manager. 37.The applicant shall comply with all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 38.A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 39.The applicant shall pay school fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District prior to issuance of building permit. 40.The project shall connect to sewer and meet all requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). The applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to the EVMWD and shall incorporate all district conditions and standards. 41. The design and construction of the project shall meet all County Fire Department standards for fire protection. 42.All mechanical and electrical equipment shall be ground mounted. All outdoor ground or wall mounted utility equipment shall be architecturally screened along with substantial landscaping, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permit. 43.All front yards and side yards on comer lots shall be properly landscaped with automatic (manual or electric) irrigation system to provide 100 percent plant and grass coverage using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods. The final landscaping/irrigation plan is to be reviewed and approved by the City's ACENOA ITEM NO. S PAGE 4: i OF S ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 7 of 17 VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN Landscape Architect Consultant and the Community Development Director or designee. A Landscape Plan check fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval based on the Consultant's fee plus 40 percent. 44.Planting within 15 feet of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than 36 inches. 45. The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to the use of Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive watering. 46.All landscape improvements shall be bonded with a 100 percent Faithful Performance Bond for materials and labor for two years from Certificate of Occupancy. 47.All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within an affected portion of any phase at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested for any building. 48. The Final landscape plan shall be consistent with any approved site and/or plot plan. 49. The Final landscape plan shall include planting and irrigation details. 50.All exposed slopes in excess of three feet in height within the subject tract and within private lots shall have permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, as approved by the Planning Division, prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. 51.Fences located in any front yard shall not exceed three feet in height with the exception that wrought-iron fences may be five feet in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited. 52.Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 10' x 20' of interior clear space for two cars for a total interior clear space of 20' x 20'. 53.Prior to issuance of any precise grading permit or building permit, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. ACENOA ITiM NO. 5 PAGE 4 ''8: OF S"B CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 8 of 17 VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN 54. These Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on subsequent building plans prior to issuance of building permit. 55. The Homeowner's Association shall maintain all project improvements and facilities, including the project streets, landscaping, park facilities, and drainage improvements. 56.Applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. Proof shall be presented to the Chief Building Official prior to issuance of building permits and final approval. 57.The Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Fee (MSHCP) will be due upon issuance of each building permit. 58.Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid. 59.Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department have been met. 60.Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fee in effect at time of building permit issuance. 61.The applicant shall at all times comply with Section 17.78 (Noise Control) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. ENGINEERING General Requirements: 62.A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. 63.Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant to provide to the Ci~with ACENOA \rEM NO. PAGE.~1__0F ~ ~ CONDITIONS OF AFPROV AI.. Page 9 of 17 VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. Such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 64.All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. 65.This project shall comply with the recommendations of the traffic study prepared by Webb and Associates, dated October 12,2005. 66.Phasing Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. Bond public improvements for each Phase as approved by the City Engineer. 67.An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work on City right-of-way. 68.Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. Overhead utilities shall be undergrounded. 69.Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 70.Applicant shall obtain any necessary Caltrans permits and meet all Caltrans requirements for any work within Caltrans right-of-way. 7l.Applicant shall obtain any necessary County permits and meet all County requirements for any work within County right-of-way. 72. The applicant shall install permanent bench marks per Riverside County Standards and at locations to be determined by the City Engineer. 73.Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. 74. The applicant shall incorporate bus bays in the street design unless not required by RTA. 75.Applicant shall pay all applicable development fees, including but not all inclusive: TUMF, MSHCP, TIF and area drainage fees. ACEr~OA ITEM NO. S PACE SO OF S ~ -=--- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 10 of 17 VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPEOFIC PLAN 76.10 year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria are exceeded, drainage facilities shall be provided. 77.All drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 78.All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 ~" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 79.Slope maintenance along right-of-ways shall be maintained by a homeowner's association. 80.All open space and slopes except for public parks and schools and flood control district facilities, outside the public right-of-way shall be owned and maintained by homeowner's association. 81.All waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or other phases of the construction shall be disposed of at appropriate recycling centers. The applicant should contract with CR&R Inc. for recycling and storage container services, but the applicant may use the services of another recycling vendor. Another recycling vendor, other than CR&R Inc., cannot charge the applicant for bin rental or solid waste disposal. If the applicant is not using CR&R Inc. for recycling services and the recycling material is either sold or donated to another vendor, the applicant shall supply proof of debris disposal at a recycling center, including verification of tonnage by certified weigh master tickets. 82.0n-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage easement. 83.All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 84.Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs should drain to a landscaped area. ACENDA ITEM NO. S PAGE..2..: \ _OF <s ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 11 of 17 VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPEOFIC PLAN 85.Applicant shall comply with all NPDES requirements in effect; including the submittal of an Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as required per the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. The requirements of WQMP may affect the overall layout of the project. Therefore, WQMP submittal should be during the initial process of the project. 86.Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. (Required for lot of one acre or more) 87.Applicant shall provide BMP's that will reduce storm water pollutants from parking areas and driveway aisles. (Required for lot of one acre or more) 88.City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law. Prior to Approval of final Map, unless other timing is indicated, the subdivider shall complete the following or have plans submitted and approved, agreements executed and securities posted: 89.Construct the traffic signal at State Route 74 (Riverside Drive) and Grand Avenue. A south bound deceleration lane on State Route 74 shall be provided. 90.Interior streets shall be privately maintained and shall have a minimum width of 28' unless otherwise approved by the Fire Department. 91.Construct and dedicate right-of-way on State Route 74(Riverside Drive) from the ACENDA ITEM NO. t;:b PACE~~_OF_S CONDITIONS OF APPROV AI.. Page 12 of 17 VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN channel to Jamieson Street per City's General Plan (part-width improvements). The improvements include sidewalk improvements over the flood control channel to sidewalk improvements at the school site and sidewalk improvements from the project entrance to Jamieson Street. The applicant shall construct the required landscaped median along State Route 74. Note: Part-width improvements plus a deceleration lane shall be required from the channel to the project entrance. The project entrance shall be right-inJright-out only. 92.Construct and dedicate right-of-way on Grand Avenue from the project boundary to State Route 74 (Riverside Drive) per City General Plan (part-width improvements). Full improvements shall be required from the old Riverside Drive to State Route 74. The applicant shall construct the required landscaped median along Grand Avenue. Full access shall be provided at the project entrance. Note: Standard roadway widening (rather than taper) north of the driveway entrance shall be required. 93.Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds prior to final map approval. 94.Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. 95.Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 96.Make an offer of dedication for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or as shown on the Map. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the city. 97. Applicant shall submit signing and striping plans for the required street improvements and a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the project to be approved prior to final map approval. All signing and striping and traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. This includes Street Name Signs, No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the project. 98. A Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare street and traffic improvement ACENDA'ITEM NO. S- PACE 5 3 OF S~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 13 of 17 VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN plans and specifications. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). Street improvement plans shall show existing and future profiles at centerline of street, at top of curb and at centerline of the alley. The profiles and contours will extend to 50' beyond the property limits. 99. All Public Works improvements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to final map approval. The improvements shall include street and drainage improvements, street lighting, and associated traffic improvements related to the proj ect. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 100. Submit grading plans with appropriate security, Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer for approval by the City Engineer. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or diversion of drainage. 101. The grading plan shall show that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are located near the project entrances that minimize sight distance standards. 102. Construction Project access and hauling route shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer, 103. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 104. An Alquist-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on-site. 105. The applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements and/or permits for off-site grading and/or drainage acceptance from the adjacent property owners prior to grading permit issuance. 106. Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area ,". "'.;:, 'ILM NO. S , P~~E~t_OF S~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 14 of 17 VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN Management Plan. 107. Applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a Notice of Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program with a storm water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction, which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development including maintenance responsibilities. The applicant shall submit the SWPPP to the City for review and approval. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 108. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to building permit. 109. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location, such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. 110. No structures, landscaping, or equipment shall be located near the project entrances that minimize sight distance standards. 111. Pay all Capital Improvement TIF and Master Drainage Fees and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34). Prior to Occupancy 112. Pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of off-site public works improvements (LEMCI2.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy. 113. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. . ,.....,...OA ITEM NO. 5 PACE_55_OF S~ CONDITIONS OF APPROV AI.. Page 15 of 17 VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN 114. All public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans or as conditions of development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 115. All signing and striping and traffic control devices shall be installed. This includes Street Name Signs, No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract. 116. Water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with Water District requirements. 117. The traffic signal at SR 74 and Grand Avenue shall be operational. 118. Pay fair share costs of offsite improvements as identified in the traffic study. The fair share costs calculations shall be provided by the applicant and approved by the City Engineer. 119. Proof of maintenance responsibility and acceptance shall be provided for all open space, slopes, and drainage facilities, outside the public right-of-way. 120. TUMF fees shall be paid. The TUMF fees shall be the effective rate at the time when the Certificate of Occupancy is obtained. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT l2l.Prior to the approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, or Special Use Permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex into Community Facilities District 2003-1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City. 122. Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, or Special Use Permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex into Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No.1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public right-of-way landscaped areas to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public right-off-way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison. 123. Developer shall pay both Fire Station Impact Fee and Other Impact Fees . .-It:NDA rrEM NO. S PAGE 5b OF s1 CONDITIONS OF APPROV Ai Page 16 of 17 VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPEQFIC PLAN 124. Upon completion of the Fire Station Impact Study and other impact fee studies, Developer shall pay impact fee. 125. Developer shall pay CFD for Park, Parkway, Open Space and Storm Drain Maintenance 126. Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, or Special Use Permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex into the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of the new parks, parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 127. Developer to pay park fees of$I,600 per unit ($233,600). 128. All interior landscape, recreation areas, facilities and/or open space to be maintained by the HOA. No park credits. 129. Developer to comply with all NPDES storm water requirements. 130. Developer to participate in City-wide LLMD. 131. Developer to annex into LLMD District 1 for all exterior landscaping to be maintained by the City. 132. All interior streets and/or roadways to be maintained by the HOA. 133. HOA to maintain all catch basins, collectors, v-ditches or any other related flood control or storm water control device. 134. Developer to design a multi-family recycling plan through the City and CR&R. 135. Developer to comply with all City Ordinances regarding construction debris removal and recycling as per Section 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 136. Developer to meet City curb, gutter and sidewalk requirements. 137. Secondary access needs to be clearly defined as part of the development. ACENDA ITEM NO. S PACE $1 OF S <8 CONDITIONS OF APPROV AI.. Page 17 of 17 VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN 138. All existing palms (California Fan Palms and Canary Island Date Palms) to be incorporated into the project landscaping or donated to the City and relocated at the developer's expense. LAKE ELSINORE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 139. Under the provisions of SB 50, the owner or developer shall be required to pay school fees or enter into a mitigation agreement prior to the issuance of a certificate of compliance by the District. RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY 140. The applicant shall work with Riverside Transit Agency staff to include installation of one bus turnout each along Riverside Drive and along Grand Avenue. ACENDA ITEM No.5 PACE s ~ OF S 3