The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09.05.2006 PC AGENDA QTYOF LAKEELsmoRE .PLANNINGC.OMMlSSION AGENDA MJCBA&L.~.CJIAIRMAN WWW.LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG JOlIN OON~ VlCECIIAIB.MA.N (951) 61~3tU tHONE . mDw~COMMiSsIOND (951) 67.J.;2392FAX ABL~COMMIBSIOND , LAKEELSINORECVLTVRAL~ . '1I1L~.,. 183 NORTBMAlNSTREE1' JlOLIl'B P .,' . . . . , ... . , COMM1JNJTY DEVELOPMENT LAKE ELSINORE, CA 9253f . *************************************************************~fi.!Ir*.*'. ~DA Yt SEPTEMBER 5;.1006 6:00 P.M. <~ '~ J/yPU a'eatten"'gt~is Planning Coml14ission Meeting please par~in the Puking -/At aerosa the .ee! /rom. the Cultural' Cmter.. nis willassilt lIS in limit;,lg the btqJlld of .eetings' 011 the Downtown Business District. Thank you lot: your c.Quperatio"J . r ~~LLC~ 'p"', ", . .. PYB~ C~NTS -NON AGENpIZED ITEMS - 3 MINUTES .; (please read'& coinp1etea Speaker's Form at the podium, prior to the stitt c,f Ute . Plarining CQ1111lliS~ioD Meeting) CONSENT C~~1~MS (All matters,' on ~the(~ot1sent 'C~lendar are approved in on~ motion,. unless a Conunissioner ot;8ttynien1bers of the public requ~ts separate action on a specific item. ) r 1. MinotDesignlteviewofa two StOI"Y Single-Family Residence locat~dat 760 ParkWay (APN:.373-185-024). . .... ';' ',-,,' ,',' j':'. 3,""''..'''''' >c'" . '..."'"" ? r'" CASE PLANNER: Agus~ Resendiz,.Associate Planner' Ext. 232,aresendiz@lake-elsinore.org 2~ Approval Review for two (2)Singte Family Residences located ontw() (2) at 294 (APN: 373..043-003) ~d 296 (APN: 373-043-0(2)~oni CA$PLANNER: Agustin Resendiz, AssociateJ'lannef Ext. 232, aresendiz@lake-elsinore.org ._ RECOMMENDATION: Approval 3'. , Minor ~p Reyiew of a Single Family Residence located at 307 Heald AveriUe-APN314-161-016. r 'CASE PLANNER: Linda Miller, AssOOilwfbmner Ext. 209, lmiller@lak~1~ore~org RECOMMENDATION: Approval 4. Minor Design Review of Sign Program No. 2006-01 for Pasadena Co~erce Centerl Industrhu Design Review No. 2005-01 located at, 18267,,'182.71, and l8283 Pasadena Street (APN 377-130':'030). CASE PLANNER: Linda MiUer,Associate Planner Ext. 209, lmiller@lake-elsinore.org RECOMMENDATION: Approval' ~ PUBLIC~ARlNG IlEMS .r PAGE3-P (' (please .read &~le~ea Speaker's FOrm at the podium prior to the start of the Planning Commission Meeting. The Chaianan 'will, call on yOU to speak when.your item is called.) 5. Anne:?CationNo. 78; General Plan Amendment No. 200&-01;~";a.nnnation Zone ~,No~2~J; Mitigated/Negative Declaration No. 3 a request to re4esjgbate 21.103' acres from County Zoning of Very Lo. ' "ty Residential, 1 acretninimum lot size (VLDR) to "EaSt Canyon Hills , C Plan'" " and 'pre..tomng from County Residential Agriculture..!, one 'aCre minimum lot size '10 ~'East Canyon Hills Specific Plan." , CASE PLANNER: Carole Donahoe,Associate Plawter' Ext. 287, cdonahoe@lake-elsinoft'.org REcoMMENDATION: Approval 6. Annexation.No~ ,7~;General Plan A.n1el)dment No. 2006-05; Pre~ Zone Change No. 2006-05; Zone Change No. 2006':07;, " Plan No. 89..} , fifth Revision; Tentative TractMapNo. 337 ' ;' .tig~~ " ' Negative Declaration No.. 2()()6.04 a request to: r . :Approve annexation No. 76 and the commencement of proceedings, to opng 62-:42 acres into the City boundaries cUrrently in the County of :Riverside~s . jurisctiction,.but within the City's Sphere of Influence area.' . '- ,-""',- -; - - - - - " ,- --'- .' ^JlPf()ve General Plan Amendment No. 2006-05 to redesignate of 47 .7J 'acres 'fton;t CQUnty Very Low Density Residential, 1 acre minimum lot size . .,.,~} to Ratnsgate SpecificP1an; 14.71 acres from CountyVLDR to Low. n' ~ 3 dwelling units per acre; and 4.99 acres from City Very Low Density Resi 'ii, tial, . 0.5 dwellingumts per acre, to Ramsgate Specific Plan. . Approve'Pre..Annexation Zone Change No. 2006-05 to ,add to the Official Zoning Map 47.7'1. acres from County Rural Residential, ~ acrenriniml,lll1lot size(RR) t;6Jtam$gat~ Specific Plan, and 14.71 acres fromClYtinty RRto'R-E Estate Single"PainiiY'R.esidential, ~ acre minimum lot size:" ' , J r . Approve Zone, Change No. 2006-07 to rezone 4.99 acres from City Rural Residential, 2 acre :minimum lot size, to Ramsgate Specific Plan. r . Approve~gate Specific Plan No. 89-1 Fifth Revision, which adds 52.7 .. acres of vacant land: for residential development to then~~tetn portion of the SP as new Planning Area 10. e Approve the subdivision of52.7 acres fQrthe constructionof221.~nglefami1y resi~tiallots, five (5) water quality basins, and twenty-tiv~~~)Of)enspace lots., . CASE PLANNER: Carole Donahoe, Associate: Planner Ext. 287, cdonahoe@lake..elsinore.org . Approval RECOMMENDATION: IlI1SIN,JtSSITEMS . r !NFO~UQ~AL ADJOURNMENT r CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 PREPARED BY: AGUSTIN RESENDIZ, ASSOCIATE PLANNER PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A TWO STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 760 PARK WAY. (APN: 373-185-024) APPLICANT: HECTOR ZUBIETA: 26397 BECKMAN CT. MURRIETA, CA 92562 OWNER: MANUEL ROBLES, 36146 MUSTANG SPIRIT LANE, WILDOMAR, CA 92595 PROJECT REQUEST The applicant is requesting design review consideration for a conventionally built two story single-family dwelling unit pursuant to Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.23 (R-1 Single-Family Residential District), and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Proj ect Site North South East West Vacant Vacant Residential Vacant PAOE \ \ OF ~S REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A TWO STORY SINGLE -FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 760 PARK WAY (APN: 373- 185-024) PROJECT LOCATION The approximately .15 acre vacant site is located on the south side of Park Way, at the intersection of Park Way and Avenue 1, within Specific Plan K (Country Club Heights #2). PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting design review consideration for the design and development of a 1,557 square-foot two story single-family residence with an attached 479 square-foot two (2) car garage. The total building footprint including the residence and garage is approximately 1,215 square-feet. The existing lot has a net area of 4,219 square- feet. The proposed structure will have net lot coverage of approximately twenty-nine percent (29%) percent and is in compliance with Section 17.23.090 (Lot Coverage) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The property is located at the south- west intersection of Park Way and Avenue 1. To be more precise the property is located at the terminus of Park Way, which is continued by an existing "Asphalt Concrete" alley. Architecture The applicant has chosen to construct the proposed single-family residence using elements similar to those found in the Bungalow Architectural style. The front elevation will include; decorative roof dormers, extended rafter tails, and enhanced window planters. Stone veneer will be placed on the first and second story of the entryway elevation and on the exterior of the chimney. The applicant also proposes to extend the porch with additional "elephantine" columns with a wood trellis roof element above. In addition to the decorative architecture applied to the house and pursuant to Section 17.14.080 of the LEMC, the applicant will install a 6 foot high decorative block wall along the perimeter of the property, with the exception of the interior side of the lot where there is an existing wood fence. Furthermore, the applicant will install wall returns of decorative block with architecturally constructed gates on either side ofthe residence. It should be noted that the decorative wall returns will aesthetically match the stone material used on the proposed dwelling unit. AGENDAJTEM \ PAGE 'J... o~ - - REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A TWO STORY SINGLE -FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 760 PARK WAY (APN: 373-185-024) Landscaping The applicant will provide front yard landscaping which will include an automatic irrigation system and a rain sensor, assisting in the conservation of water. The applicant will also provide one l5-gallon street tree thirty feet (30') apart along the street frontage for compliance with the City of Lake Elsinore Landscape guidelines. All of the proposed street tree(s) will be selected from the approved street tree list. Color and Materials Roof Walls & Trim Fascia Board& Rafters Stone Veneer Ponderosa X -12 Chablis Amber Waves Sand Concrete Tile BACKGROUND On June 8, 2006 the Design Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the proposed plans and provided several substantive comments on the proposed architectural design. The comments included, building massing and enhancement of the entry way as well as door and window ornamentations on all ofthe elevations. The DRC recommended that the applicant revise the architecture to incorporate elements that are consistent with the selected style of architecture and to address the comments generated from the review. Once revised, the applicant re-submitted plans along with building elevations, which illustrated that the DRC's recommendations were fully incorporated into the project. ANAL YSIS Staffhas reviewed the project and found that with the attached conditions of approval, the project meets all minimum requirements of Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.23 (Single-Family Residential District), and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM \ PAGE~OF~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A TWO STORY SINGLE -FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 760 PARK WAY (APN: 373- 185-024) Municipal Code (LEMC), including, but not limited to; density, setbacks, landscaping, parking, private open space, and lot coverage. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15303(a) (New Construction olSmall Structures), staff has determined that the proposed project will not have a significant affect on the environment and shall therefore be exempt from the provisions of CEQA. Therefore no additional environmental clearance is necessary. RECOMMENDATION Staff requests that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2006-_ approving the proposed residential dwelling unit based on the Findings presented in the attached Resolution, Exhibits, and the Conditions of Approval. PREPARED BY: AGUSTIN RESENDIZ, ASSOCIATE PLANNER APPROVED BY: Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Director of Community Development ATTACHMENTS: 1. VICINITY MAP 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 3. PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 4. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION 5. REDUCED SET OF PLANS 6. ENLARGED SET OF PLANS AGENDA ITEM \ PAGE~O~ VICINITY MAP MINOR DESIGN REVIEW TWO STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNIT 760 PARK WAY LAKE ST ...... w .-..---...-----.--. => z w ~ PARK WY PLANNING COMMISSION ~ ACENDA ITElII NO. \ S PACE S OF ~ RESOLUTION NO. 2006- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A TWO STORY SINGLE- FAMILY DWELLING UNIT AT 760 PARK WAY(APN: 373- 185-024) WHEREAS, Manuel Robledo filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Minor Design Review for a two story single-family residence on property at 760 Park Way (the "Project"). The application was submitted pursuant to Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.23 (Single-Family Residential), Chapter and 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of approving Minor Design Review requests for residential projects; and WHEREAS, notice of the Minor Design Review consideration has been given and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item on September 5, 2006. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Project and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and determines that this project is consistent with the LEMC and is exempt from further environmental clearance pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Section 15303. SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 of the LEMC, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of the Project: 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the intended General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project will be located. The Project complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan designation Specific Plan K. Specific Plan K is comprised of 161 acres and is intended to provide a range of densities and some limited commercial and industrial uses. The approval of this single-family dwelling unit will assist in \ ACENDA ITEM NO. PAGE, 6 OF ~S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE20F3 achieving the development of a well-balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses by providing additional affordable housing within the City of Lake Elsinore, as well as encouraging the development and maintenance of a broad range of housing types for all income groups and age categories. It should be noted that the proposed dwelling unit, which incorporates Bungalow style architecture, will provide a well rounded design while maintaining the desirable rural characteristics and base framework to achieve quality and compatibility in the physical design of the developing portions of the City, and to enhance existing developed areas within R-1 and Low Medium Density Zoning and the Specific Plan" K" under the General Plan designation. 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the LEMC. The Project is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the single-family dwelling unit has been provided with twenty foot (20') front yard and rear yard setbacks, sufficient front yard landscaping, and safe and sufficient on-site vehicular circulation. Further, the Project will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non- detractive relationship with adjacent existing projects. 3. Subject to the Conditions of Approval imposed on the Project, the Project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. The Project, as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City divisions, departments and agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment. It is hereby found and determined that the Project is exempt from further environmental review pursuant to a Class 3 categorical exemption for new construction of small structures (see 14 C. C.R. ~ 15303). 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to LEMC Section 17.82.070, the Project has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission. The applicant shall meet all required setbacks and development standards pursuant to Section 17.23. Any revisions to the Minor Design Review attached hereto shall be processed in a similar manner as the original Minor Design Review. All plans submitted for building division plan check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by the Conditions of Approval. AGENDA ITEM NO. \ PAGEloF~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE30F3 SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of September, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEk'f NO. \ PAGELOF~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A TWO STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 760 PARK WAY (APN: 373-185-024) Note: Fees listed in the Conditions of Approval are the best estimates available at the time of approval. The exact fee amounts will be reviewed at the time of permit issuance and may be revised. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, employees, and/or agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its officials, officers, employees, or agents concerning the project attached hereto, which action is brought forward within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 65009 and Public Resources Code Section 21167. 2. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final ten (10) days from the date of the decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Council pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.80 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 3. If the project proposes an outdoor storage tank, the applicant shall locate the unit within the side or rear yards. If location must be within the front yard, the applicant shall provide a method of screening subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development or his designee. PLANNING DIVISION 4. Minor Design Review approval of a two story single-family dwelling unit at 760 Park Way (APN: 373-185-024) will lapse and become void one (1) year of the approval date unless a building permit is issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion. 5. All Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced upon page one of building plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division for Plan Check. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 6. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the Applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions," and shall return the AGENDA ITEM NO. \ PAGE ~ OF ~s CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A TWO STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 760 PARK WAY (APN: 373-185-024) executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall obtained and submit a "will serve" letter from Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. The "will serve" letter shall specifically indicate the specific water flow volumes for both domestic and fire protection water supply. 8. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations, with revisions as noted herein. The applicant shall meet all required setbacks and development standards pursuant to Section 17.23 (R-l Single-Family Residential). Any revisions to the Minor Design Review attached hereto shall be processed in a similar manner as the original Minor Design Review. All plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of Approval. 9. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Project, the Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore to provide (a) 15% of the units constructed in the Project as affordable housing units in accordance with the requirements of Section 33413(b)(2) of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.), or (b) an alternative equivalent action as determined by the City which may include (without limitation) dedication of vacant land, construction of affordable units on another site, or payment of an in-lieu fee at the rate of $2.00 per square-foot of assessable space for each dwelling unit in the Project. For purposes of this condition, "assessable space" means all of the square-footage within the perimeter of a structure, not including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, detached accessory structure, or similar area. The amount of the square-footage within the perimeter of a residential structure shall be calculated by the building department of the City in accordance with the standard practice of the City in calculating structural perimeters. 10.All materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used unless modified by the Applicant and approved by the Community Development Director or designee. AGENDA ITEM NO. \ PAGE~OF~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A TWO STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 760 PARK WAY (APN: 373-185-024) II.All second-story windows and vents shall use foam surrounds and/or other architectural-type features approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 12.All roofing materials shall have a concrete or slate tile as noted on the construction plans. 13. The Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 14.A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers placed on the site and used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 15. The Applicant shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. Construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and no construction activity shall occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal holidays. 16. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted control techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided thirty (30) days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer. 17.Any exterior air conditioning or other mechanical equipment shall be ground mounted and screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Air conditioning units and related equipment may not encroach more than two-feet (2') into the required minimum side yard setback. 18.All garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum interior clear space of twenty feet (20') x twenty feet (20') for two cars. 19.The Applicant shall plant twenty-four inch (24") box street trees, selected from the City Street Tree List, a maximum of thirty feet (30') apart and along all street frontages. All planting is subject to the approval of the Community AGENDA ITEM NO. \ PAGElLoF ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A TWO STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 760 PARK WAY (APN: 373-185-024) Development Director or designee prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 20. The Applicant shall provide shrubs and plant materials as shown on the landscape plan. Any changes to this plan shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. The landscape plan improvements and plantings shall be fully installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 21.All planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than 36 inches. 22.The Applicant shall provide an irrigation system for landscaped areas onsite as shown on the landscape plans. The irrigation system shall be fully installed and operational prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 23. The Applicant shall provide a rain sensor as shown on the landscape plan. The rain censor shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 24.All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, as approved by the City's Landscape Architect. A Planting and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted, approved and planted prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Fees are required for review of plans and inspections. 25.All driveways shall be constructed of concrete per Building and Safety Division standards. 26.All walls or fences located in any front yard shall not exceed thirty-six inches (36") in height with the exception that wrought-iron fences may be five feet (5') in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited. 27.All walls and/or fencing need to be located off the property line. If the Applicant proposes to place any walls and/or fencing on the property line he/she must submit a notarized agreement between the subject property owner and the adjacent property owner to the Planning Department prior to installation. AGENDA ITEM No.L PAGE \~ OF~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A TWO STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 760 PARK WAY (APN: 373-185-024) 28. The Applicant shall be required to remove and replace any existing chain link fencing and any fencing that is in poor condition. It will be the responsibility of the Applicant to contact the effected neighboring property owners. If the existing fencing is in good condition, this requirement may be waived per the approval of the Community Development Director or Designee. 29. The building address shall be a minimum of four inches (4 ") high and shall be easily visible from the public right-of-way. Care shall be taken to select colors and materials that contrast with building walls or trim. 30.The Applicant shall provide a flat concrete pad a minimum of 3'- 0" by 7'- 0" adjacent to each dwelling unit. The storage pad for trash barrels shall be concealed from public view. 31. The Applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid prior to issuance of building permits. 32.The Applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees in effect at the time prior to issuance of building permits. 33.The Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 34.The Applicant shall pay the Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee (MSHCP) Local Development Mitigation Fee prior to obtaining building permits. 35.The Applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $64.00 made payable to the County of Riverside for a Notice of Exemption. The check shall be submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the projects approval. 36. The Applicant shall pay all applicable Library Capital Improvement Fund fee. AGENDA ITEM NO. \ PAGE Xl OF~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A TWO STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 760 PARK WAY (APN: 373-185-024) CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 37.The Applicant is to pay park fees of$I,600 per unit. 38.The Applicant will be required to participate in the "Public Facility" fee program. 39.The Applicant shall participate m the City-wide Lighting, Landscape Maintenance District (LLMD). 40. The applicant shall comply with all NPDES storm water requirements. 41. The Applicant is to comply with all City Ordinances regarding construction debris removal and recycling as per Section 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 42. The Developer must meet City curb, gutter and sidewalk requirements. 43.City's Landscape Architect must review all landscape and/or irrigation plans. LAKE ELSINORE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 44.Under the provisions of SB 50, the owner or developer will be required to pay school fees or enter into a mitigation agreement prior to the issuance of a certificate of compliance by the district. LAKE ELSINORE POLICE DEPARTMENT 45. The Applicant shall provide assurances, prior to building permit, that all requirements of the Lake Elsinore Police Department have been met. ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 46. The Applicant shall request a "will server" from the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. AGENDA ITEM NO.l PAGE~OF!2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A TWO STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 760 PARK WAY (APN: 373-185-024) ENGINEERING DIVISION 47.All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to building permit. 48.Process and meet all parcel merger requirements prior to building permit. 49.Process and meet all lot line adjustment requirements prior to building permit. Provide quick claim grant deed for exchange of title. Provide proof of concurrence by mortgage holder if applicable. 50.Street abandonment shall be processed and approved prior to building permit Issuance. 51.Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location. such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. 52.Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 53.Provide fire protection access and facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. 54.In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. 55.Protect palm trees in place, or contact the Community Services of City of Lake Elsinore for Palm Tree Preservation Program, LEMC 5.78 Ordinance 1044. AGENDA ITEM NO. \ PAGE jSOF TS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A TWO STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 760 PARK WAY (APN: 373-185-024) 56.All grading and street improvement plans submitted to engineering shall be drawn on 24" x 36" Mylar and be set into City's specific border and title block, and include City's specific grading or street general notes, for which digital files are available by an e-mail request to agutierrez@lake-elsinore.org. 57.All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 58.Construct all public works improvements, side walk, curb and gutter and pavement in full width of 20 foot alley, and pavement transitions per approved street plans (LEMC Title 12). Plans shall be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit (LEMC 16.34). 59.A Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare street and alley improvement plans and specifications. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). Street improvement plans shall show existing and future profiles, at top of curb and at centerline of the alley. The profiles and contours shall extend to 50' beyond the property limits. 60.lf the existing street improvements are to be modified, the existing street plans on file shall be modified accordingly and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit. An encroachment permit will be required to do the work. 61. Work done under an encroachment permit for off-site improvements shall be delineated on the street improvement plans and approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. 62.Pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of off-site public works improvements (LEMC12.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy AGENDA ITEM No.l PAGE~OF ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A TWO STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 760 PARK WAY (APN: 373-185-024) GRADING 63.Developer shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. 64.Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security pnor to any grading activity. 65.A grading plan stamped/signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer is required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. The grading plan shall show volumes of cut and fill, adequate contours and/or spot elevations of the existing ground as surveyed by a licensed surveyor or civil engineer. Contours shall extend to minimum of 15 feet beyond property lines to indicate existing drainage pattern. Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security. 66.Provide soils, geology and seismic report, as part of this report address the requirement of the Alquis-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 67.Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 68.All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. DRAINAGE: 69.0n-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent property owners by a notarized letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage easement. 70.All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or AGENDA ITEM No.l PAGEnOF~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A TWO STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 760 PARK WAY (APN: 373-185-024) shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 71.Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs shall drain to a landscaped area. Driveways shall be sloped to drain into landscaping prior to entering street facilities 72.Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or diversion of drainage. FEES: 73.Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34). The traffic mitigation fee is $1,369.00 and the drainage fee is $1,602.00 (Riverside Drive So. Dist.), and the TUMF amount is $9,693.00. STORMWATERI CLEANWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM 74.City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law. AGENDA ITEM NO. \ PAGE~OF~ Notice of Exemption City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (909) 674-3124 (909) 471-1419 fax Filed With: 0 Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 [g] County Clerk of Riverside County 2724 Gateway Drive Riverside, CA 92507 Project Title: Minor Design Review for a two story Single-Family Residence at 760 Park Way. Project Location (Specific): The proposed project is located on the south-west corner of Park Way and A venue I: (APN: 373-185- 024). Project Location (City): City of Lake Elsinore Project Location (County): Riverside County Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project: The applicant is requesting design review consideration for the design and development of a 1,557 square-foot two story single-family residence with an attached 479 square-foot two (2) car garage. The total building footprint including the residence and garage is approximately 1,215 square-feet. The existing lot has a net lot area of 4,219 square-feet. The proposed structure will have a net lot coverage of approximately thirty-one (31 %) percent. The property is located within the R-l (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District and has a General Plan designation of Specific Plan "K". Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Lake Elsinore Name of Person / Agency Administrating Project: Agustin Resendiz, Associate Planner, City of Lake Elsinore Exempt Status: D Ministerial (Section 15073) D Declared Emergency (Section 15071 (a)) D Emergency Project (Section 15071 (b) and (c)) 129 Categorical Exemption (state type and section number): Article 19 Categorical Exemptions Section 15303, Class 3 (a) New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures Reasons why project is exempt: This project meets the requirements pursuant to Section 15303 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Contact Person: Agustin Resendiz Telephone Number: (951) 674-3124 Signed: Title: Director of Community Development Rolfe M. Preisendanz ACENOA ITEM NO. PAGE \ \ \ OF ~~ ~ I 99LL 92:5: ~96 05:92:6 '10 '3~ONIS13 3>1V1 A'IM >I~'1d 09L 003180H 13nNW4 3 .. f ~ ~ ~ ~ <{ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ 'j~ . ~ e f I- ~ it ~. I!:/~U Ji~; ~! u ~ .~ q U. ~~ 'g ~d ! ~ ~..; ~ - . ~; Ii ~ ~ ~ .. I ,~ ^ I ~! < ~ . ~~~ <. r ~~~ I ~~i i~~I~ ~r~ .*L.Sd ...-. 1lIS"'UN 1Id._,* __\O~ "&:t__ 'NIUSOCIII+~+"MlfGlIIIJll I~ I~ I: p ~ iU i . I~~ ~ ~~I -Ix ~ S'. 1.\ ~ i~: 'i · ~:t II!I, 11111 t~~~ ~ liU Hl, ~H~1 ~U,! ...x~ ';;;~ ~ I~;" ~m ~ 8~d E il al a 1 f~ ! i~ ~ ;5 ~ j' I i! s .. ~ 'I - h ~ l~ ! d~ ~ W~I NVld :i1dV:)SONVl .l.WN1"n:a~d ':a.us ...... """"": ~ X IlJ ~ ~ 2 n ! J! ~i~IHi~ ~ mliB~hi Q L H4h~ ...... . ~ L ~ 0 I ti I ~ ~ ; ~ f 2 I ~ ~ ~ ~ III ..! j:! H ~ OIl ~.: n I: 1111 r I. j .. Pi ~ ii- - ' i Pi ~ ! H y ! U. ~ ~! W ~~. Iii . k ~ lH ! h: i i(" i ,I ! j. ~ l~ S i~ I~ U H . ~ i. 'i ~i \ ~ I ~~ ! H i ~~ . ~ ~ p "~ ~ i ~!! I ~ i 5 ~ ~ i ~ ~ n; f h~i;i Z i i ~ ~~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~ j ~~ ! ~ - I~ ~. i I ~ i~ i ta I fti t: ... ~.. ~ . ~~ ~ 1,1 d ~\!Il ~ ~~ ~ ~. ~ ~& ~ ~i 4 ~89 l I - -----( I I ~ l~ ~ _____--1 - I! .fe.... _ i I ~ ! ~iisih ~h~~~~ Ii iIU~!; n ijl~m p ~fhni d li~i:YI 10 p~~He ~; 2:0!llj ~2 ill!~IP H ~~;~nd I! I i I ~ni 0 I ~i 5 ~ ~III~ ~ ! i~ i~ ~ ~H~ j ~ i ; I !lll'jllllllllllll I I~ u Hli i. ! II'! .i i;~ d ~!i ~ ;~ I ~iilll. i U" I~ ~~~h i~ ! ih~ ; ~ I i ,~ ~ H ~ I ~ ~ ! ~ i!, ACENDA liEM NO, \ PACE ~O OF ~:) ~ . ~ ~ v \:! :s~ ~~ t~ <:; ~ i ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ s I . ~ . ~~ ~ ~ . E . ~ ~ ~ ; >~~ ili~~iS d i~"~~ ~ h h~ ~ h~ ~~~.~~th~~~~ ~~L ~ UdMgh~~~S~ ~ m ii 888 ,........ ...... <Z.! I ~ I ' · j ! s -----.--- .l.itiU.68N 0Y0lI "If 1$1X3 ....----.... ....---::- ---------"1'; --..... ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ , =:=:==:_- =:=~~::~~ ~- f 1: I I I I I I I I I I I .... ""\ ,,~ ~'" ~~ I" ~ t IiI " ~ ~~ ~I~ :ll ,,~ " . t;j~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~i~~;1 J~ ~ ~~~ ~i>I~ ~~~" ~31~~ f~>1 iJl;~"~ ~ ~~~~ ? ~~~~ ~ ~~~J ~ ~ ~ll~~ 7 ~~~lli;~ ~ ~ C: 1~~h~1 ~~~'~~~ ie~~~g~i ~h~~~,~ ~i~~~~~ ~~~~ii~~ ~~~ho~a S~~~~~\>~ ~~~'~~ii I!UIM ~~~~~i ~U'~~I ,~~~!i! ~ ~!l~~~ : ~ ~~~e~"~~~ g~~!~hd ~ ~~~~~I~ I!~h;i~~ ~M!~M !! l!!! ' L i :JONU .... ~ ~ ~ ~ '" a ~:~~ ~ ~ \> , ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~WHh ~~ IIi III '-'1 ~~I >- ~ 0: ::> Vl Z >- w <{ 0: Cl:: ...l ~ 0 a.. z z w a ~ ~~ : w ~~ w ~~ b ~ a~ z :5 ~Q. "- <{ o ;!:: :::; >- :J ..... w U ~ i g ~ ~ I I ~ 2 ~ . i ~ i sa ; II ~ Iii ; I' ~ i III p. M i~S! I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~ tie~~i ~ ~~ ~"i~~;~ il~~ I~es ~~~i!~;~ ~~I~ i!~~ . J~,~I~~ t~~ ~I~i a j:ll:in ;:!~ ~~:! ~ ~~~~~i~~ S~II ~~~~ ;i!~I~~~1 I~~~ ~!:; ~~ "12' ~~~!i! ~I~~ ,~~ ~a, ,~~ ~r!le~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~d~~S~~ -~~~ li~~~ ~~~~~il~ ~g~~ ~!~~ '~.h ~~ ~~~~ ~~~I i~;~~I~11 n~l~ !:~~ d~~~:~~ ~~ i ~~~~ ~a~~hl.'~ i~ ~ ~ !lImn 1m li;1 '" !~ . ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ " "~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ I ~ ~ ~. ~ h ~~h ~ ~i ~~ I J ~ ~ fe ~ ~ . ~ ~~i ~~h ~ ~ ~ . i ~ "~~ ~ "~ i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ " ~" 3i~ ~ 0 ~! ~8 ~ ~~ ~ e @ii ~ ~~ ~ ~i ~ ~~i~ ~ ~ d g ~ ~ ~I ~ ~~i ~ !e ~ ~ ~ ~ t ;~ ~ i ! ~i a:i ~ ~ : ~~ ~~ ~6!:~; i I~ ; ~~e~ II!~ ~ ! i~~~~~ gti~~~~ ;~ ~e, ~B~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !~ ~ ~~~ ~ ; ~~~! ~~ ~~i~ ~~< ~ ~ ; !~ ii ! i1i~~~!!~~ :~ ~ ~2~~ ~~~f ~ a ~~~!~~ ~!~~~~ ~~ :g~ ~e~ ~ ~ I~~ ~ ~ h~ ~ ~5~ ~ ~~~~~Ia ~i'! ~~~ ~ ~ Il ~~~ I ~~ iIi ~~~:: ~~ ~ ~~ · :e~1 i ~ ;o~~'a~~UM ~~ ;R~ jl~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ :! !I~i !ii~~ I~I;!!!;I ;~!i ;!! ! ; : ~~~!i! ~J;!;;ifl~~i ; ~;I; I;ij i ~ ~;!~II~;:~i1i;~~ :~ !i~I~;;~; ~ ii! ! ~ (b .~~~ i1i~~~3 "beeo~~ e~.. ~3' ~ i F "i~.~~s~ ~t .e~i\ >~h~ .~ i'~~ ~illg ~ ~ ~~a~a~~i~.~~~ ~o ~'~~~~~~I ~ 3~~ ~ ~ ~ II~~ ~'6AI ~0~1~~~~~ ~m>~ ~ii~~2 " ~ ~ieiwi~~~ ~~~~S~~~~~w ~~:~ ~~i~ ~ ~ ~i5~~.~oP~~6~ ;1 .~~~h!~I~'~~ ~~~ ~ ~ 2 ~~a6;;j~~l iWi~~ d!i ~.~~3 ~ ~ ~~~~~~.~.I~M~ :~~fw f' t~.~~~ "'~ea~~.~~~:~~ ~~~~"~.S~3~U~ ~iir m !Ii ill!!!l!!l!!i!!. ...lill ll!!l!!!l !l!li!I!!~j!!!i!!j!!i !lll,!!l!11 1,1!li!ill!lli! !i!li!!!l!II!!l!ii1!li! ~ ;1~;~I~I;~I~i~E~~ii~:~I!~!;!~:i~i~i~~~!:~!aJ~il~!~;I~1~~I~iil~:;~~I~!~ii;~I~~~~i!ii~~~li~!!~i!~~~!!I~~;~~~I!~ ~d!~ ~ i~~~6ii~2g 2~2~f~f~" ~I ~ ~~ f i1di~. ~ ~ ~n~ ~~t~ ~~~ ~ I~ < ~.~..dfe~~<!. ~,,~J~ ..1. ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~i. .~i.. ~t ~ d.. <m .: ... '" ~ ".; ..;..: .0 ai 2:: ~ 1:.!! ~ ~ ~~ :;:l ~ fj ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~~ f!1;:;:;i ::? :; ~:s: t:i ~ !I I '5' j~ i! "1 ~ I il! ~ IjI ~ Hi ~ IV . H~ e~ ~;~ ~~~ ~~~ , i ~Ig~ ~o ~~ ~~i~:ll i m: i 8~ g ~~~!: ~~~gl ~"~ , , ~,!.. ~ ~.~ , , ~N .> ~~. , , ciN " . i~~ i i.;U~~ ~m~~ [: i5.!."~ 'b I' d~ ~ OF ~5 9SLL 9?:r ~S6 lL88..lMXW ...-. 8.1 i II ftn_'WW .......- "ClflllllllmllK'll: ~~ OrS?:6 '10 '3~ONIS13 3>lV1 1IlI.ISQlII + 'IIlCIlIJIWlO" '1llIlICJlJS:W ..... ~ I A'IM >I~'1d 09L NVlcl ~1.:l ONO::l3S ONY lQIl:l ---~ ~j~ j<( 'ON ,"',";/" I 003180H 13nNW4 . l ...,er .fe',. .1<-'" .~-.. .....1 ~-.. ....c .10'" ..... . c::J ~ f . .. ~ .H : .. U,- ,._ ---w ! ~ ri ~'&, t ...J ~ 0.. id f- i .. oc ~ ~ ~ to ..... e-- I t ~ 8 .. . ... . '.. d;--. V~ ~~~1biV I ~- -jy , ill ...J u.. r- ~ ~ l' n .. I Lj ; ,;I> .. z .J iI~: It. aHD ~ ~ ..,~~~ i 0; u:~ N mu ~ i~ I a ~, ~ .. L: ~~DJ1~ ~F 1 i .. ~ . --'$ ,- "'I -",... or .fo-.. .fe'" "-." ..... .[0-.. .10-,. -, .".. .....G .fe.a .fe',. 4 ,..,K .... I ...... ...." ....11 ....... ..... .1>-.' ..... ...a , ",..1 ....E ....,.r:- .~... .fe'" _L rT"T . ~ '+ mmm m L 0 l' .. l' ~~ n I ~ ~ er t : .. ,-~ _? -~ i I I ~ ~ :v T ~ i. ~ ,.- '~ ! ~ .:i . - - ~ a 2 ~!~; ...J i ~ ~ z: ~.I..I . ~~ . Q ml- k T I~ ~ a'~ I o ~~~ . L ~r ~~. I 0:0.... ~ 0000 ijl~ ; . ...J ;, ~ u.. r----'-=j ~ ~ H . ..J . ~" 100- .. . ., II . N I. ;, ~ ! :~ J.:... li ~ II ,~ - $ ,- I 'l , EJ ~ ''''-T-1-~R~ ,. Q tw -f.~ ~ ~ .. T .. .. [~ 1 ~19 ID . . .~-.. 1 .fe-.. .10-.' .10-.. I .t.,. f4,.".Cl ~ ....... I \ ACENDA ITEM NO. PAGE d~ OF ~5 ~ ! 9SLL 9?:r ~C;;6 OrC;;?:6 'I::l '3~ONIS13 3>1'11 ^'IM >I~'Id 09L 00318m1 13nN'ffl NYld.:lOml """" """": ~ ...-. .tN. LCtX'U nn_*_ ZIliZI'fO'W3lIIftIl "J.:)fMIl:DItICM 1iIIlUSCIlII.~+"M&ICIlI5'JlI ~ ; g ; pg i ~ ~ ~. Hi! I~ ! ! u, Mj ~~ ~I~I~ t~ 51 l~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ -!: . ~ n 8 h ~ 2~1~~ ~~ III ~ ~i ~ h~h i~ ~~~ 0 .... ... <'I i ~ ! =~li ~~r. S~n a~H .08 .. ~i nn n~!;~u U~; W~;ln B~~l ~'li~~U ~6!o ~M!~!r 3i 'i~~' ~~l~ ~~~. a~g~ a5~~ t?8 ~~ z <{ -I lL 15; C): -0 OC~ ;; I .~ ~ i z i ACENDA ITEM NO. PAGE ~~ OF ~5 9<;LL 9Z\: O\:<;Z6 W~ ' L<;6 3CJONIS13 3>1W1 J...VM W:Nd 09L 003180CJ rn -" NVI^l z () j:: <l: > ill --l ill SNOIIW^313 2 ~I ~li ~ i ~. - <fl ~i ~ ' . ~ ~,~ a ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ . ~ ! 8 i ~ ,~ Z ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ · ~ ~ ~ ~ · . Q ~~ ~ ~. ~ , ~ . ~ i ~ ~ ~ ; 3 : ~ Ii ~ ~H hd Iq d n n w ~~ ~ ~. . 8 .~li ~ u l ~ ! 9 ~ ul, ::8 ~ ~ ~al ~ ~ ~ I ~ i ~ ,,-'. ~.s~~:~:: ~ j:: <1: > - 0 .~... ' ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE ~ ~ \ OF ~S <l 9SLL 92:>: lS6 O>:S2:6 'if::' '3dONISl3 3>lVl A'ifM >ld'ifd 09L 003l80d l3mN~ SNOII03S tQSWG ~1ll1!)H1 .,. ~~ ~~ ~~ a ~Q (~ ~ , ~~ " ~~ 0 ~ ~:o ~g ~ ~ ji . ( t=~ --"~ ~ ~ u: 0 w. <fl' ~g ~~ (~ ~ u ~! at to o . Q ~ r ~~ . ~ i ..'I: 9 !!l ~"; . ) ~- ~ ~m~ . oil" ~ ~~ 8 ~~ d ~~ d ~m~ o~~.. ~t=~ ~~ ~~ ~ ""oJ 5 ~~ J .. ffi~ ~ ii; ~ ~. . . ~~ . ~[ / :. ii ( -~~~~ "m.:i~ n; ~.~ H ~~3 ~~~ i ~ I i<~~~~~~ ~~~t~fig i~I;~li ~2~ti'~ UJ;~~ \'I~ ~~... ~ iDi' z o u! \ . \ oj! ~~ ~~ .~ *i' ~~ ;. (\' <i' I- <J) :::J (\' I I- \-l 2 g ti! UJ' <J)~ PAGE ~~ OF ~5 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DA TE: SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 PREPARED BY: AGUSTIN RESENDIZ, ASSOCIATE PLANNER PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR TWO (2) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES LOCATED AT 294 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-003) AND AT 296 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-002). APPLICANT: OSV ALDO MAESTRI 253 E. PECK STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 OWNER: JESUS ALCARAZ AND ARTURO PEREZ 3748 ASH STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 PROJECT REQUEST The applicant is requesting design review consideration for two (2) single story residences to be placed on two (2) vacant lots pursuant to Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Design Standards), and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Standards. PROJECT LOCATION The two (2) vacant lots are adjacent to each other, lot number 373-043-002, has a gross lot area of7,953 square feet and lot number 373-043-003 has a gross lot area of 9,965 square feet. The properties are located approximately 70 feet south of the intersection of East Heald Avenue and Moroni Street in the area known as the Historic Overlay District of the City of Lake Elsinore. The properties are zoned as MHD, within the ~ ACENDA lTeA NO._ ~ 1 PACE... \ _Of_ - REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 PAGE 2 OF 5 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES AT 294 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-003) AND 296 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-042-002). Historic Overlay District and General Plan designated as Medium High Density. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Residential Medium High Density Residential MHD Medium High Density Residential MHD Medium High Density Residential MHD Medium High Density Residential (MHD) Medium High Density Residential (MHD South Residential East Re sidenti al/ Vacant West Residential/ Vacant PROJECT DESCRIPTION 294 Moroni Street (APN: 373-043-003) The proposed development on this lot will include a 1,532 square foot conventionally built dwelling unit with an attached 480 square foot two (2) car garage. The total building footprint area is approximately 2,052 square feet or twenty-one percent (21 %) ofthe total lot area of9,965 square feet meeting the maximum allowable building area of fifty percent (50%) per the requirements of the Historic Elsinore Standards. The residence includes a wood trellis entry, great room, dining room, kitchen, nook, office/guess room, three (3) bedrooms, and two (2) bathrooms. 296 Moroni Street (373-043-002) The proposed development on this lot will include a 1,418 square conventionally built AGENDA ITEM 'd.. PAGE 'd-. OF Vl REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 PAGE 3 OF 5 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES AT 294 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-003) AND 296 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-042-002). dwelling unit with an attached 480 square foot two (2) car-garage. The total building footprint area for this unit is approximately 1,937 square feet or twenty-eight percent (28%) of the total lot area of7,953 square feet, also meeting the maximum allowable building area. This residence includes an entry, great room, dining room, kitchen, nook, three (3) bedrooms, and two (2) bathrooms. Architectural Design Both units utilize architectural features of Craftsman style architecture. These features include elephantine columns, stone veneer wainscot, wide window frames and paned glass windows, covered porch entries, multiple roof planes, shake siding at gabled ends, decorative wood braces and exposed rafter tails. The following is a summary of the materials and colors proposed for each unit: 294 Moroni Street (APN: 373-043-003 Roof Lite Concrete Tile Walls Stucco Fascia/Rafter Tails Wood Wainscot Stone Veneer 296 Moroni Street 'APN: 373-043-002 Roof Lite Concrete Tile Walls Shake Sidin Fascia/Rafter Tails Wood Wainscot Brick Veneer Landscaping and Fencing An automatic irrigation system and landscaping will be provided in the front setback area of each unit. Approximately 1,458 square feet or fifteen percent (15%) of the lot area of294 Moroni Street and approximately 1,0030rthirteen percent (13%) oflot area AGENDA ITEM J PAGE~OFTI REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 PAGE40F5 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES AT 294 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-003) AND 296 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-042-002). of 296 Moroni Street. The applicant shall construct the City's Standard six foot (6') wood fence along the sides and rear property lines of both lots. The return walls in view ofthe public right of way and along the front ofthe houses will be architecturally enhanced, matching the architectural style of the house. The applicant shall be required to remove and replace any existing chain link fencing or any fencing that is in poor condition. If applicable, it will be the responsibility of the applicant to contact the affected neighboring property owners. Ifthe existing fencing is in good condition, this requirement may be waived per the approval of the Community Development Director or Designee. BACKGROUND The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (DRC) on June 8, 2006. At that meeting the items that were discussed and required attention were: . The proximity of the dwellings from one another. . The use of different exterior building materials. . An enhanced entry. . A revised grading plan in order to minimize the height of the retaining walls,. . The modification of the elevations and roof lines without having to drastically change the mirror floor plans. ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the project and found that with the attached Conditions of Approval, the residential project complies with the minimum requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Standard including but not limited to density, setbacks, landscaping, parking and lot coverage. Additionally, Staff has determined the residences will meet and/or exceed the quality of the existing homes in the area. AGENDA ITEM d. P AGE ~ OF ~ :1 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 PAGE 5 OF 5 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES AT 294 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-003) AND 296 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-042-002). ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA), this project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) Class 3(a) that exempts up to three single family residences. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2006-_ approving the Minor Design Review for two (2) single family residences, and associated improvements located at 294 Moroni (APN 373-042-003) and 296 Moroni Street (APN 373-042-002). Approval is based on the Findings presented in the attached Resolution, Exhibits, and the Conditions of Approval. PREPARED BY: AGUSTIN RESENDIZ, ASSOCIATE PLANNER ~, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY: ATTACHMENTS: 1. VICINITY MAP 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 3. PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 4. CEQA - NOTICE OF EXEMPTION 5. REDUCED SET OF PLANS 6. FULL SIZED EXHIBITS (Same as listed above) AGENDA ITEM <a PAGE~OFE{ VICINITY MAP MINOR DESIGN REVIEW 2 DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS MORONI STREET / LU ~ z ::i ~ z o () PLANNING COMMISSION ACENDA liEllINOo_ ~ J- PACE_ b _OF - - RESOLUTION NO. 2006- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR TWO (2) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS LOCATED AT 294 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-003) AND 296 MORONI STREET (APN: 373- 043-002) WHEREAS, Osvaldo Maestri filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Minor Design Review for two (2) single-family residences on two (2) separate vacant lots located on the east side of Moroni Street just south of East Heald Avenue and Moroni Street Intersection (the "Project"). The application was submitted pursuant to Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Standards; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of approving Minor Design Review requests for residential projects; and WHEREAS, notice of the Minor Design Review consideration has been given and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item on September 5,2006. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Project and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and determines that this Project is consistent with the LEMC and is exempt from further environmental clearance under Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Section 15303. SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 of the LEMC, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of the Project: 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project is located. The Project complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan, in that the approval of the two (2) single-family residences will assist in~chieviPf. a Ac.ENOA \tf;M WJ._-7J, i -- PAOE_ 1 _Of - - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE20F3 development of a well-balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses as well as encouraging the development and maintenance of a broad range of housing types for all income groups and age categories. 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the LEMC. The Project is appropriate in size and design to each lot. Each single family unit meets all setback requirements, provides front yard landscaping, and complies with the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Standards by proposing Craftsman style architecture. Features of the Craftsman include: elephantine columns, the use of wainscot, wide window frames and paned glass windows, covered porch entries, multiple roof plans. The two (2) single-family residences will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects in that the architectural design, color and materials proposed are distinct yet they blend in with the surrounding homes. 3. Subject to the Conditions of Approval imposed upon the Project, the Project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. The Project as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City divisions, departments and agencies will not have a significant effect on the environment. It is hereby found and determined that the Project is exempt from further environmental review pursuant to a Class 3 categorical exemption for new construction of small structures (see 14 C.C.R. ~ 15303). 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to LEMC Section 17.82.070, the Project has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission. The Minor Design Review has been evaluated pursuant to LEMC Section 17.82.100 and all other applicable Sections of the LEMC and the Historic Standards. The Project was found to be in compliance with all regulations and objectives of LEMC and the Historic Standards. AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ PAGE~OFn PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE30F3 SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of September, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM NO. 1- PAGE ~ OF.1.! CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS LOCATED AT 294 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-003) AND 296 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-002) Note: Fees listed in the Conditions of Approval are the best estimates available at the time of approval. The exact fee amounts will be reviewed at the time of permit issuance and may be revised. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, employees, and/or agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its officials, officers, employees, or agents concerning the project attached hereto, which action is brought forward within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 65009 and Public Resources Code Section 21167. 2. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final ten (10) days from the date of the decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Council pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.80 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. PLANNING DIVISION 3. Minor Design Review approval of two (2) single-family dwelling unit located at 294 Moroni Street (APN: 373-043-003) and 296 Moroni Street (APN: 373-043- 002); will lapse and become void one (1) year of the approval date unless a building permit is issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion. 4. All Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced upon page one of building plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division for Plan Check. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 5. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the Applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions," and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. AGENDA ITEM NO. .~ PAGE NO. JQ OF ~l CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS LOCATED AT 294 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-003) AND 296 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-002) 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the Applicant shall obtained and submit a "will serve" letter from Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. The "will serve" letter shall specifically indicate the specific water flow volumes for both domestic and fire protection water supply. The applicant shall submit water plans to EVMWD and shall incorporate all District conditions and standards, including payment of applicable connection fees. 7. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations, with revisions as noted herein. The applicant shall meet all required setbacks and development standards pursuant to Section 17.23 (R-l Single-Family Residential). Any revisions to the Minor Design Review attached hereto shall be processed in a similar manner as the original Minor Design Review. All plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of Approval. 8. The development of the homes shall be in conformance with approved plans referenced herein or modified with the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 9. All materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used unless approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 10.Composition shingle will no longer be a permitted roofing material at a minimum the applicant shall use a concrete tile, or other material approved by the Community Development Director or Designee. 11. The Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 12.A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers placed on the site and used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. AGENDA ITEM NO. :2. PAGE NO.jL OF:ill1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS LOCATED AT 294 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-003) AND 296 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-002) I3.The Applicant shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. Construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and no construction activity shall occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal holidays. I4.The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted control techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided thirty (30) days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer. I5.The applicant shall meet all applicable County Fire Department requirements for fire protection. 16. The applicant shall meet all applicable Building and Safety Division requirements. I7.Any exterior air conditioning or other mechanical equipment shall be ground mounted and screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Air conditioning units and related equipment may not encroach more than two-feet (2') into the required minimum side yard setback. I8.Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum interior clear space of twenty feet (20') x twenty feet (20') for two cars. 19. The Applicant shall plant twenty-four inch (24") box street trees, selected from the City Street Tree List, a maximum of thirty feet (30') on center along all street frontages. Planting is subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. AGENDA ITEM No.1 PAGE NO.Q OF ]. l CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS LOCATED AT 294 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-003) AND 296 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-002) 20. The Applicant shall provide shrubs and plant materials as shown on the landscape plan. All accent shrubs shall be a minimum five-gallon (5) in size. Any changes to this plan shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. The landscape plan improvements and plantings shall be fully installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 21.Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than 36 inches. 22.The Applicant shall provide an irrigation system for landscaped areas onsite as shown on the landscape plans. The irrigation system shall be fully installed and operational prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 23. The Applicant shall provide a rain sensor as shown on the landscape plan. The rain censor shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 24.All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, as approved by the City's Landscape Architect. A Planting and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted, approved and planted prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Fees are required for review of plans and inspections. 25.Driveways shall be constructed of concrete per Building and Safety Division standards. 26.All walls or fences located in any front yard shall not exceed thirty-six inches (36") in height with the exception that wrought-iron fences may be five feet (5') in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited. 27.The applicant shall construct the City's Standard six foot (6') wood fence along the sides and rear property lines of each lot. The return walls in view of the public right of way and along the front of the residence will be architecturally enhanced, matching the architecture style of the residence. AGENDA ITEM No.2 PAGE NO. i)OF ~ 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS LOCATED AT 294 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-003) AND 296 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-002) 28.The Applicant shall be required to remove and replace any existing chain link fencing and any fencing that is in poor condition. It will be the responsibility of the Applicant to contact the effected neighboring property owners. If the existing fencing is in good condition, this requirement may be waived per the approval of the Community Development Director or Designee. 29. The building address shall be a minimum of four inches (4") high and shall be easily visible from the public right-of-way. Care shall be taken to select colors and materials that contrast with building walls or trim. 30.The Applicant shall provide a flat concrete pad a minimum of 3'- 0" by 7'- 0" adjacent to each dwelling unit. The storage pad for trash barrels shall be concealed from public view. 31. The Applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid prior to issuance of building permits. 32.The Applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees in effect at the time prior to issuance of building permits. 33.The Applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 34.The Applicant shall pay the Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee (MSHCP) Local Development Mitigation Fee of $1,651.00 (fee for density less than 8 du/ac) prior to obtaining building permits. 35.The Applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $64.00 made payable to the County of Riverside for a Notice of Exemption. The check shall be submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the projects approval. 36. The Applicant shall pay the applicable Library Capital Improvement Fund fee. 37.The Applicant shall pay the applicable Building Impact Fee. AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ PAGE NO. )u..OF n CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS LOCATED AT 294 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-003) AND 296 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-002) 38.Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Project, Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore to provide (a) 15% of the units constructed in the Project as affordable housing units in accordance with the requirements of Section 33413 (b)(2) of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.), or (b) an alternative equivalent action as determined by the City which may include (without limitation) dedication of vacant land, construction of affordable units on another site, or payment of an in-lieu fee at the rate of $2.00 per square foot of assessable space for each dwelling unit in the Project. For purposes of this condition, "assessable space" means all of the square footage within the perimeter of a residential structure, not including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, detached accessory structure, or similar area. The amount of the square footage within the perimeter of a residential structure shall be calculated by the building department of the City in accordance with the standard practice of the City in calculating structural perimeters. ENGINEERING DIVISION 39.All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to building permit. 40.Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location. such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. 41.Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 42.Provide fire protection access and facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ PAGE NO.lS. OF ~ 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS LOCATED AT 294 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-003) AND 296 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-002) 43.In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. 44.All grading and street improvement plans submitted to engineering shall be drawn on 24" x 36" Mylar and be set into City's specific border and title block, and it shall include specific grading or street improvement notes, for which digital files are available by an e-mail request to "agutierrez@lake-elsinore.org" 45.All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. DEDICATION: 46.Dedicate 10' wide strip of additional street right of way along the property line on Moroni Street, for a total of30' right of way from centerline of the street, to the City prior to issuance of building permit. 47.Public right-of-way dedications shall be prepared by the applicant or his agent. Deeds shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permit. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 48.Construct all public works improvements from property line to one foot beyond centerline of Moroni Street and pavement transitions per approved street plans (LEMC Title 12). Plans shall be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit (LEMC 16.34). 49.A Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare street and alley improvement AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ PAGE No.liL OF Tl CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS LOCATED AT 294 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-003) AND 296 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-002) plans and specifications. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). Street improvement plans shall show existing and future profiles at centerline of street, at top of curb and at centerline of the alley. The profiles and contours shall extend to 50' beyond the property limits on Moroni Street centerline. 50.lf the existing street improvements are to be modified, the existing street plans on file shall be modified accordingly and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit. An encroachment permit will be required to do the work. 51. Work done under an encroachment permit for off-site improvements shall be delineated on the street improvement plans and approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. 52.Pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of off-site public works improvements (LEMCI2.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy. GRADING 53.Developer shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. 54.Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security pnor to any grading activity. 55.A grading plan stamped/signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer is required since the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards and the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. The grading plan shall show volumes of cut and fill, adequate contours and/or spot elevations of the existing ground as surveyed by a licensed surveyor or civil engineer. Contours shall extend to minimum of 15 feet beyond property lines to indicate AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ PAGE NO. n OF ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS LOCATED AT 294 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-003) AND 296 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-002) existing drainage pattern. Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to grading permit issuance. 56.For structural design purposes or for cut or fill greater than three feet, provide soils, geology and seismic report, as part of this report address the requirement of the Alquis-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 57.Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 58.All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. DRAINAGE: 59.0n-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent property owners by a notarized letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage easement. 60.All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 61.Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs shall drain to a landscaped area. Driveways shall be sloped to drain into landscaping prior to entering street facilities 62. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. The report to include the total water shed draining into the site. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or diversion of drainage. 63.Pay master plan of drainage fee of $14431.00 for lot 3 and $1204.00 for lot 2 AGENDA ITEM NO.~ PAGE NO. --.d OF~ 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS LOCATED AT 294 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-003) AND 296 MORONI STREET (APN: 373-043-002) (Town No.2 District.) FEES: 64.Payall Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34). The current traffic mitigation fee is $1,369.00 per residence and the current drainage fee is total of $2,650.00 (Town No.2. Dist.), for both residences for and the current TUMF amount is $9,693.00 per residence. The amount of all fees shall be in accordance with the amount in effect at time of payment. STORMW ATERI CLEANW ATER PROTECTION PROGRAM 65.City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law. AGENDA ITEM NO.1- PAGE NO. ~ OF 1:1 City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (951) 674-3124 (951) 471-1419 fax Notice of Exemption Filed With: D Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 [g] County Clerk of Riverside County 2724 Gateway Drive Riverside, CA 92507 Project Title: Minor Design Review for two (2), single story dwelling units located at 294 Moroni Street, referred to as APN: 373- 043-003 and 296 Moroni Street, referred to as APN: 373-043- 002.. Project Location (Specific): The proposed project is located approximately 70 feet south of the south-east intersection of East Heald A venue and Moroni Street, within the City of Lake Elsinore Historic District. Project Location (City): City of Lake Elsinore Project Location (County): Riverside County Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project: The applicant is requesting design review consideration for the design and approval of two dwelling units. One of the developments at 294 Moroni will include a 1,532 square foot conventionally built dwelling unit with an attached 480 square foot two (2) car garage, the second dwelling unit will include a 1,418 square conventionally built dwelling unit with an attached 480 square foot two (2) car-garage. The properties are Zoned as MHD, within the Historic Overlay District and are designated as Medium High Density under the General Plan. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Lake Elsinore Name of Person / Agency Administrating Project: Agustin Resendiz, Associate Planner, City of Lake Elsinore Exempt Status: o Ministerial (Section 15073) o Declared Emergency (Section 15071 (a)) o Emergency Project (Section 15071 (b) and (c)) [8] Categorical Exemption (state type and section number): Article 19 Categorical Exemptions Section 15303, Class 3 (a) New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures Reasons why project is exempt: This project meets the requirements pursuant to Section 15303 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Contact Person: Agustin Resendiz Telephone Number: (951) 674-3124 Signed: Title: Director of Community Developm~ ':} . p.Ct:NOP- \i~ NO.~ PAGE~Of Rolfe M. Preisendanz 0<,,,,,-...,,,,., I jj ~lH~ ll~ ~ 'l.'ilI~1-l '1l.'10 l.:::l::ir~ !!I3d ~~'1 . Z'Vl!!I'1:::lW 'il1193r N'11d ::il.I'il '1 II I II ~ h ~ ~ ~ ~ I!!, , \5: , I! ~ 1 \l ~rI n;;o;;; ~ I ................ ~ tecIOQI tDt . ....... ...... I ...... ! II I i I I : a I! "ill ~.l H Iii Idlll~ I II!. I !IIII II II ntU .s~. ~ h d . · ~ ..0 r3 EI .,..... n ,15 I~ it id II ,- li Ii II II '! I! ; II d n ii I~ & , ~rl~ ~ :-;-'- ~~ ~- ~> ~ ,.;_; ~C:S ~~" ~ !- ~~ ,. o~_" '" s. ~~ ~='...~,=a. , u 8:-i\d! r=':',':':~ L~c::!.L:::J In d; um ~ ~i~i~ nm i'l i pel' I Iii j a ~ i ~ .. I Iii! I if II in II i ~ 8 I I; ~ al! Iii H Ii. II I n I K x I >- I B n' il . I IU I ~ hd2 ~ i ~ H ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I ~Im~ f~! j, i ~ n n = i I HIli Ii Ull a ~ i En' ~ ~ ~ lli!j1h I. ill Is i ~Ii H linn n I 1(?:~ - ~i .......... S II! AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ PACE~ \ OF ~.] 2 I is .. ;:j e ~ h I ~ I~ I Ill! Id~ & I~ ~ ~ I a~ !~~I il ! \~. ~II! ~:i~li ~ !i sS~~~~ a. <( :::IE ~ ~a 511 ill !~~ g5~ ~lii i: ~ ~ ~ I ~ !~I I ~ ~ ;ilrh~l! illl~a I i~h ~ I i ~Illn~~;t ~~nl~ I ~u ! II i hett'''~ h'~b'~_~ I~! 'l+ f i ~ ! ~ J I t ~ wi Ii; I U ~!II!!! ! lUlll t ~ e~1 ~ M!U~I ~h! liil ~u~nll I~ER "II I;II;II~ Iii!! I!i! ~;i~11 ~~ ~!II ;!!~ II~~ I~B :il; ~:~~ linli~i ~H~' 9' ~I ~i/;IR~I~ ~I!; ~~i6 ibi!l~i :1:; ;!~I It;~~!!i i nIl U~I I I!I ;;11 ul~ IU II;lliil e. ~iJ II~ . i U. til I-a ~~ U B~ II II Ih I II ..~~ II II ~I; II II I,~ i I II ~I~ Ii! 'I : i ~~~ ~~~ ..:.......""d'"',.:....~=~ !!t!!~~~ ~ R~R;I ~ i :::1 -1"'1 '8 . ~~ ~~ ~" ~ z ... w ~ ~ ~ l!i ~ i <( >- 5 ~ ..J ~:2 B ~~ ~ iiI ~ uf ; I ~ i ! ! ~ 1..1';Ii II! I~ . .'11 it ! qi ! P ! I I I ~ ~ ~i ~ a "I i ~ :! I ,5 J.l. . }1 · I i!~ ~ It l g it} ~ I . '- a ~ ~ ~ I ~~xl ~,!. !~ ~. . Jii I M NO. <) . PACE ~ <).. y-OF...1.J- '0' -+ 1 ~( ,/ ~ t: ~ I :...~ ~ __'"4-----_ -___ _ __~!~-_=_---------:_:.-=:~~-=-~-.~ - '''''-- " OV08 :JV J..S1xr."~ - - - -- - -- - --.~ ~ \\,>--"''''~ - - - -- :: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - -- ::~:::-::- ~i~ -= -=:---= < - -:: ::"<e,:<- ......... - ......... --- ~ · a ~:l g - ......... --""0 " ", '\ \ \ (L&tl ---------.-f"5Cr ------CKD-- ______(~(,(1I-__ --------<C~t"l~ / / / , / ~I /' \ I " . , ~1. "~ 3,('i'1, \ ~, \ " i - -_/ - .c' d .. ~ , ~ !i II ' III II Ii I' Ii III II I I I . d I Ill: i ! d Ibl al. ~. ! S!b ill , ~ r I~b b~S U, i s I I 'i ~ Iii Ih iiS ~!lI!!! I HUll! ,i ~~~ e6 !iw 5 _~I ~ In ,~I: ~ i ~ ~ Ii 5 ;arlh I iU~ilhl ,nol R!iln~ mUlls. .... . . '''''~-'''''~-!I~i''1 I.~~ ~ -r/,.(-,- , ...............&.J1f. 15 - ...... -(6o./J_ '''\ I I j" \, '\ " oo-..e... It.... oo~" ii I~ 1./ ill at! . . '1 lfi Ii, ; 'p g I.i Iii lU Hi PACE ! B ~ NO. Q') OF J ~~ 0EliiZG '1:J '~NIS13 3)1'11 JJ ~ll I-li 'J.S INO<!!IOi-l j"<l ~a..I Ol!lr1.l.llol'1 t Z'<:fl!I'V::"'''' 91'Kl3r N'11d llIOO1:l I I ,I t 'I II 1 I I I n I . I i ~ d I I ~ I~ I ~ I il I r 'I II~ lPI I r! I nil! i ;1~~II' ili ~ P hil 'It_lil!'IIII!I~tJHIIIIIIIII~ III ~ 01 ...,..4 .. ...t1 .. If III ::if 11IIII 'II! II _. III II It ::t __ ~.: _.. III If .. ~ . I I I~ I I'. f! I n1~ "I i I Iii III! IIIIIII!II I, I h .;1 . bl!.:I!!HU!d l * I~ .. t I ! "t .. T .. , . ~ l !ll ~ . ~ O! ! 1- 8~~ J iu T ---l * . .. ...... .1<'" ...... .... ...... ... .,..... .fc-A .fc-. .,.... .fl-.z 01-" ~- ACENOA ITEM NO. ~ PACE Q4 OF~ 0ESZG '1'::) '~ONIS13 3)W1 Jj ~l~ l: 'J.SI~i-l N 1- j<{ 3c.I O<!llrw:.l'>' , Z'noI'>'::)1'>' 911S3r N'l'1d :lOO2ol I ~t it ! h ~ "II ~ ~~ ~. ~ I d) liii ~ 111111 B ~ Ilq III~ ll~ B ~Ili llllj!i Iii 1'1 iilb il ;!;I~ III ,II " ill ; I:~ g ~I II I . I I ~ o I dd I ~ 'I,q ili Ui ~ 'l~ i. ..Iii fl ~ ~ ., ~S ,OF ~l ~ PACE c211<:'iZb '<1::) '3l!ION1913 3)1'<11 31..lJ. 9 m01'<1'DNnS Jj ~lH- 'J.91~i-l l.~ ~ ~ad Ol>Inu.I'<1 . ~'<1::l""" 9r193r 9NOIJ.'<1A313 I a I i ~I I;, l~ ~ I II! i I IIi ~ . i lill ilub II .r ~I I, ~ dl i= nl ~ --I IU II :n~ I ~h . i lill ilub I B I II .L . . 'inn' ! IBII ill ill ~II ~8~ I rd! ~ I~ ..... ~ Ir~ Itt ~il ~ II 1 II I 1 ".".1\:\ ,.' " ",'I", ." ,,1'" "]', ; ," 1 " ':,1':'" ,tJ.' ..', ~ ' II , ",I': ' .': Itt ,:'1 ,'" " x~ I ,', ~h ". . . . . .~ G i= ',t' :,:' ~ : ,,1',: ~ ,:~,.I.,: i~ , ',."', 0: ZJ :1" ',,' . ",i,.,: ." If . :, i: " . ' ":'1,:' ", ,', ':'.' .I':' ,,', " ,,,'1,: , :, j' , . ' ,::,1. .:' " '.1", ','j .~ . ~ 1 ~ ~ . ~ ~ I B I fI~ or. !uh .~ I . ! ;~i ~i W h I b nt nl .L -I Z o ,: .' i= <[ > . IU --I IU :n~ . .... ,~. ~I; xi I .,.', i II, lit ,-~ ~I " ,.' , ,0 I, 'i', n; ~h . '.. .' , , ", ."," .. ,. "'" " -' ~I ; , , II~ 181 .d .:. -," '13]""""" . . .. , . . ~ i= <[ > IU --I IU :I I-~ ~i r ....~ .1 ,-~ I <) ACENDA iTEM NO. PAGE ~b OF ~( "'(..~ "7':::> '~NI913 3>1"7'1 JJ ~l~ l:~ ~ 'J.91~l..j 13d ~11J.<!:I"7' . ~"":::>1'V 9n9:!r 9NOIJ.:::>39 ':lNla1lng 1- .." I;~ III 'IIil in ~ 5~ w: 01)1 ;: ~ G~ lHi ... "-A .... ~ A(jENOA ITEM NO. ~ PACE d1 OF Q 1 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 PREPARED BY: LINDA MILLER, PROJECT PLANNER PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 307 HEALD AVENUE - APN 374-161-016 APPLICANT: HECTOR F. ZUBIET A, ZENOS, INC., 26397 BECKMAN COURT, MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA 92562 OWNER: JEFF HOWIE, 1240 ONT ARlO AVENUE, SUITE 102, CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92881 PROJECT REQUEST A Minor Design Review consideration for one (1) single-family residence pursuant to Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards) and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Standards. PROJECT LOCATION The project will be located within the Historic Overlay District at 307 Heald Avenue (APN 374-161-016). ACENDA ITEM NO. ~ 3 P.~CE \ OF ~ " PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 PAGE 2 of4 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 307 HEALD AVENUE - APN 374-161-016 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Project Site Vacant HD - High Density HD -High Density Historic Overla District North Single Family HD - High Density HD -High Density Residential Historic Overla District South Single Family HD - High Density HD -High Density Residential Historic Overla District East Single Family HD - High Density HD -High Density Residential Historic Overla District West Single Family HD - High Density HD -High Density Residential Historic Overla District PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is proposing to develop a 1,450 square foot conventionally built single family residence with a 110 square foot porch and 475 square foot attached garage. The total building footprint area is 2,035 square feet or approximately twenty-five percent (25%) of the total net lot area of 8,250 square feet meeting the maximum allowable building area of fifty percent (50%) per the requirements of the Historic Elsinore Standards. The project meets all LEMC's municipal code requirements including setback and building height requirements. The residence will include an interior entry, great room, nook, kitchen, three (3) bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms and laundry area. Architectural Design The architecture proposed for the single family residence is a Craftsman style that uses horizontal wood siding, wood shake within the front pediment, heavy wood out-lookers, stone veneer wainscot, elephantine columns with stone veneer base, decorative wood railing, Craftsman style light fixtures, wide window surrounds with decorative paned glass, and concrete tile roofing material. The following is a summary of the materials and colors proposed: ACENDA ITEM NO. 3 PAGE d... OF cl '-\: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 PAGE 3 of4 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 307 HEALD AVENUE - APN 374-161-016 Architectural Feature Walls Material Horizontal Siding Shake Color Himalaya Restorative Trim/F ascialRailing Roofing Stucco Wood Concrete Tile Chablis Himalaya Arlington Landscaping and Fencing An automatic irrigation system and landscaping will be provided in the front setback area on approximately 825 square feet or ten percent (10%) of the project site. The applicant shall construct the City's Standard six foot (6') wood fence along the side property lines. A decorative masonry wall with gates will be constructed at the rear property line along the alley way. Decorative masonry pillars and historic type wood gates will be provided at the front fence returns. The applicant shall be required to remove and replace any existing chain link fencing and any fencing that is in poor condition. It will be the responsibility of the applicant to contact the affected neighboring property owners if it is found the fencing will need to be removed and replaced. ANALYSIS The proposed residential project complies with the minimum requirements of the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Standards. Additionally, Staff has determined the home will meet and/or exceed the quality of the existing homes in the area. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA), this project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) Class 3(a) that exempts up to three single family residences. ACENOA ITEM NO. PAGE ~ 3 OF cl ~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 PAGE 40f4 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 307 HEALD AVENUE - APN 374-161-016 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2006-_ approving the Minor Design Review for one (1) single family residence, attached garage and associated improvements located at 307 Heald Avenue - APN 374- 161-016. Approval is based on the Findings, Exhibits, and attached Conditions of Approval. Prepared by: Linda M. Miller, AICP, Project Planner Approved by: ~ Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Director of Community Development --- ATTACHMENTS 1. VICINITY MAP 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 3. PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 4. CEQA - NOTICE OF EXEMPTION 5. REDUCTIONS (SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, FLOOR PLAN, ROOF PLAN, ELEVATIONS, SECTIONS, & DETAILS) 6. FULL SIZED PLANS (SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, FLOOR PLAN, ROOF PLAN, ELEVATIONS, SECTIONS, & DETAILS) 7. COLOR ELEV A TIONS AND COLOR & MATERIAL BOARD ACENDA ITEM NO. PACE 4- , 3 OF ~4 VICINITY MAP MINOR DESIGN REVIEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ON HEALD AVENUE / / / / / f.." V, ~ is "" '- ~ --, ~ ______ '"-l '------- -~ ""-- -~:tVS ~, -~ ~~ "---, ._~- I / / / / / / PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 PACE S OF d. '-\ RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_ RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 307 HEALD AVENUE (APN 374- 161-016) WHEREAS, Hector F. Zubieta submitted an application to the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Minor Design Review for a single-family residence on a vacant lot located at 307 Heald Avenue, east of Langstaff Street (the "Project"). The application was submitted pursuant to Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Standards; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of approving Minor Design Review requests for residential projects; and WHEREAS, notice of the Minor Design Review has been given and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item on September 5, 2006. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Project and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Project is consistent with the LEMC and is exempt from further environmental clearance under Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Section 15303. SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 of the LEMC, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of the Project: 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project is located. The proposed Minor Design Review for the single family residence located at 307 Heald Avenue (APN 374-161-016) is designated HD (High Density) in the City's General Plan and Zoning District it is located in. This designation allows for multi-family development when there is enough land area to support this AGl-:PDl:' r.ri'" W":' ___._3-__ -PA~~ -.. b' Ot~ Q ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_ PAGE20F4 type of development. However, the designation also allows for single family development, therefore the project is found to comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and Zoning district. The approval of the single- family residence will assist in achieving the development of a well-balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses as well as encouraging the development and maintenance of a broad range of housing types for all income groups and age categories. This area is also known as the Historic Overlay District. This District requires the use of certain historic type architectural styles and guidelines. The project complies with those guidelines by incorporating the Craftsman style architecture thereby complying with the specifics of the General Plan and Zoning designations. The project will enhance the existing residential area. 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The proposed Minor Design Review located at 307 Heald Avenue (APN 374- 161-016) is appropriate in the size and surrounding development in that the single-family residence will complement the quality of existing development and create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects in that the architecture design, color and materials proposed meet or exceed the size and design of the homes in the surrounding area. The site and architectural design requirements comply with the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Standards in that the single-family dwelling unit has provided: twenty-foot (20') front yard and rear yard setbacks; front yard landscaping; Craftsman style architecture that includes horizontal wood siding, wood shake within the front pediment, heavy wood out-lookers, stone veneer wainscot, elephantine columns with stone veneer base, decorative wood railing, Craftsman style light fixtures, and wide window surrounds with decorative paned glass. All colors and materials proposed meet the Historic Standards as well.. 3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. The Project, as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City divisions, departments and agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment. It is hereby found and determined that the Project is exempt from further AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 PAGE~OFI~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_ PAGE30F4 environmental review pursuant to a Class 3 categorical exemption for new construction of a small structures (see 14 C. C.R., section 15303). 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.1 00 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. The project has been evaluated pursuant to LEMC Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC)and all other applicable Sections of the LEMC. The project was found to be in compliance with all regulation and objectives of LEMC. Tthe proposed single family residence located at 307 Heald Avenue (APN 374-161-016) has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission. The project has been conditioned to comply with the LEMC. For example, Condition of Approval Number 6 has been included which states; "All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations, with revisions as noted herein. The applicant shall meet all required setbacks and development standards pursuant to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). Any other revisions to the approved site plan or building elevations shall be subject to review of the Community Development Director or his designee. All plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by the Conditions of Approval or the Planning Commission through subsequent action. " SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of September, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 PAGE.JL OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE40F4 ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITErx! NO. '3 PAGE---.J...OF~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 307 HEALD AVENUE - APN 374-161-016 Note: Fees listed in the Conditions of Approval are the best estimates available at the time of approval. The exact fee amounts will be reviewed at the time of permit issuance and may be revised. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, employees, and/or agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its officials, officers, employees, or agents concerning the project attached hereto, which action is brought forward within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 65009 and Public Resources Code Section 21167. 2. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final ten (10) days from the date of the decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Council pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.80 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. PLANNING DIVISION 3. Minor Design Review approval of a single family residence located at 307 Heald Avenue (APN 374-161-016) will lapse and be void unless a building permit is issued within one (1) year of the approval date. 4. Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced upon page one of building plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division for Plan Check. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 5. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions," and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 6. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations, with revisions as noted herein. The applicant shall meet all required setbacks pursuant to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). Any ACENOA ITEM NO. PACE \0 3 OF J~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 307 HEALD AVENUE - APN 374-161-016 other revisions to the approved site plan or building elevations shall be subject to the review of the Community Development Director or his designee. All plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of Approval, or the Planning Commission through subsequent action. 7. Materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used unless modified by the applicant and approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 8. All windows shall use surrounds and/or other architectural-type features as shown on the approved plans or modified with the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 9. At minimum the applicant shall use a three-dimensional composition shingle or concrete tile or other material approved by the Community Development Director or Designee on the dwelling. Roofing materials shall have a minimum Class "A" Fire rating, and so noted on the construction plans. 10.Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. I1.A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers placed on the site and used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 12.The applicant shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. Construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and no construction activity shall occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal holidays. 13.Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted control techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided thirty (30) days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer. ACENDA ITEM NO. PACE \ \ 3 OF ~ '"'- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 307 HEALD AVENUE - APN 374-161-016 14.Applicant shall meet all applicable County Fire Department requirements for fire protection. 15.Applicant shall meet all applicable Building and Safety Division requirements. 16.Any exterior air conditioning or other mechanical equipment shall be ground mounted and screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Air conditioning units and related equipment may not encroach more than two-feet (2') into the required minimum side yard setback. 17.Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum interior clear space of twenty feet (20') x twenty feet (20') for two cars. 18. The Applicant shall plant twenty-four inch (24") box street trees selected from the City Street Tree List, a maximum of thirty feet (30') apart and along all street frontages. Planting is subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 19. The Applicant shall provide shrubs and plant materials as shown on the landscape plan. Any changes to this plan shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. The landscape plan shall be implemented prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 20.Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than 36 inches. 21. The Applicant shall provide front yard irrigation systems as shown on the landscape plans. The irrigation system shall be implemented prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 22. The Applicant shall provide a rain sensor as shown on the landscape plan. The rain censor shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. ACENDA ITEM NO. 3 PACE \~ OF ~4 A l . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 307 HEALD AVENUE - APN 374-161-016 23.All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, as approved by the City's Landscape Architect. A Planting and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted, approved and planted prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Fees are required for review of plans and inspections. 24.Driveways shall be constructed of concrete per Building and Safety Division standards. 25.Walls or fences located in any front yard shall not exceed thirty-six inches (36") in height with the exception that wrought-iron fences may be five feet (5') in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited. 26.The applicant shall construct the City's Standard six foot (6') wood fence along the side property lines. A decorative masonry wall with gates will be constructed at the rear property line along the alley way. Decorative masonry pillars and historic type wood gates will be provided along the front fence returns. The applicant shall be required to remove and replace any existing chain link fencing and any fencing that is in poor condition. It will be the responsibility of the applicant to contact the effected neighboring property owners if it is found the fencing will need to be removed and replaced. 27.The building address shall be a minimum of four inches (4") high and shall be easily visible from the public right-of-way. Care shall be taken to select colors and materials that contrast with building walls or trim. 28.Applicant shall provide a flat concrete pad a minimum of 3'- 0" by 7'- 0" adjacent to each dwelling. The storage pad for trash barrels shall be concealed from public view. 29. The applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid prior to issuance of building permits. 30.The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees in effect at the time prior to issuance of building permits. ACENDA ITEM NO. 3 PACE \) OF ~~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 307 HEALD AVENUE - APN 374-161-016 31. The applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 32.The applicant shall submit water plans to EVMWD and shall incorporate all District conditions and standards, including payment of applicable connection fees. 33.The applicant shall pay the Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee (MSHCP) Local Development Mitigation Fee prior to obtaining building permits. 34. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $64.00 made payable to the County of Riverside for a Notice of Exemption. The check shall be submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the projects approval. 35.The Applicant shall pay all applicable Library Capital Improvement Fund fee. 36.Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Project, the Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore to provide ( a) 15% of the units constructed in the Project as affordable housing units in accordance with the requirements of Section 33413(b)(2) of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.), or (b) an alternative equivalent action as determined by the City which may include (without limitation) dedication of vacant land, construction of affordable units on another site, or payment of an in-lieu fee at the rate of $2.00 per square-foot of assessable space for each dwelling unit in the Project. For purposes of this condition, "assessable space" means all of the square-footage within the perimeter of a structure, not including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, detached accessory structure, or similar area. The amount of the square-footage within the perimeter of a residential structure shall be calculated by the building department of the City in accordance with the standard practice of the City in calculating structural perimeters. AGENDA ITEM I~O. 3 PAGE \ ~ OF ~ '-\ . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 307 HEALD AVENUE - APN 374-161-016 ENGINEERING DIVISION 37.All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to building permit. 38.Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location. such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. 39.Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 40.Provide fire protection access and facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. 41.In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. 42.Protect palm trees in place, or contact the Community Services of City of Lake Elsinore for Palm Tree Preservation Program, LEMC 5.78 Ordinance 1044. 43.All grading and street improvement plans submitted to engineering shall be drawn on 24" x 36" Mylar and be set into City's specific border and title block and include city specific general notes for grading or street improvements respectively. Digital files for the border and the notes are available by request to "agutierrez@lake-elsinore.org". ACENDA \TEM NO. PACE \ S OF 3 d.~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 307 HEALD AVENUE - APN 374-161-016 DEDICA TION: 44.Dedicate a 2.5' wide strip of additional right of way alone northerly property line to the City for alley widening prior to issuance of building permit. 45.Public right-of-way dedications shall be prepared by the applicant or his agent. Deeds shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permit. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 46.Construct street pavement from gutter line to one foot beyond centerline of Heald Avenue (the minimum pavement section shall be 3" Asphalt Concrete over 5" Aggregate Base); and alley improvements with center concrete gutter and 2.5" A.C. on compacted native from gutter to property line, per approved street plans (LEMC Title 12). Plans shall be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit (LEMC 16.34). 47.A California Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare street and alley improvement plans and specifications. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). Street improvement plans shall show existing and future profiles at centerline of street, at top of curb and at centerline of the alley. The profiles and contours shall extend to 50' beyond the property limits on street and alley centerline. 48.1f the existing street improvements are to be modified, the existing street plans on file shall be modified accordingly and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit. An encroachment permit will be required to do the work. 49. Work done under an encroachment permit for off-site improvements shall be delineated on the street improvement plans and approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. 50.Pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of off-site public works improvements ACENDA ITEM NO. 3 PAGE 'b . OF ~ '"' CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 307 HEALD AVENUE - APN 374-161-016 (LEMCI2.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy. GRADING 51.Developer shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. 52.Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to any grading activity. 53.A grading plan stamped/signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer is required if the sun of the cut and fill in grading exceeds 50 cubic yards and the existing drainage flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. The grading plan shall show volumes of cut and fill, adequate contours and/or spot elevations of the existing ground as surveyed by a licensed surveyor or civil engineer. Contours shall extend to minimum of 15 feet beyond property lines to indicate existing drainage pattern. Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to grading permit Issuance. 54.Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 55.All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. DRAINAGE: 56.0n-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent property owners by a notarized letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage easement. ACENDA lTEM NO. '3 PAGE \ ~. OF , ~~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 307 HEALD AVENUE - APN 374-161-016 57.All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 58.Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs shall drain to a landscaped area. Driveways shall be sloped to drain into landscaping prior to entering street facilities FEES: 59.Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34). The current traffic mitigation fee is $1,369.00; the current drainage fee is $899.00 (Town No.3 Dist.) and the current TUMF amount is $9,693.00, the amount of fees shall be adiusted according to the fee schedule current at the time of payment. 60.Provide in-lieu payment for future off-site public improvements prior to building permit.(Res. 86-35) STORMWATERI CLEANWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM 61. City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law. ACENDA ITEM NO. 3 PAGE ,'\ OF ~ ~ Notice of Exemption City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (909) 674-3124 (909) 471-1419 fax Filed With: 0 Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 [8] County Clerk of Riverside County 2724 Gateway Drive Riverside, CA 92507 Project Title: Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence Project Location (Specific): The proposed project is located at 307 Heald Avenue (APN 374-161-016). Project Location (City): City of Lake Elsinore Project Location (County): Riverside County Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project: This is a proposal to develop one (1) single family residence on an 8,250 square foot vacant lot. The residence is a 1,450 square foot conventionally built structure with a 475 square foot attached garage. The General Plan designation and Zoning designation is HD, High Density. The project will provide affordable housing. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Lake Elsinore Name of Person / Agency Administrating Project: Linda Miller, Project Planner, City of Lake Elsinore Exempt Status: o Ministerial (Section 15073) o Declared Emergency (Section 15071 (a)) o Emergency Project (Section 15071 (b) and (c)) I8J Categorical Exemption (state type and section number): Article 19 Categorical Exemptions Section 15303, Class 3 (a) New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures Reasons why project is exempt: This project meets the exemption requirements pursuant to Section 15303 ofthe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Contact Person: Linda M. Miller Telephone Number: (951) 674-3124 x 209 Signed: Title: Director of Community Development Rolfe M. Preisendanz AGENDA ITEM NO._~ '3 PACe \ \ .. or. ? ~ ~~VY..'OL(" \UVUJ O~~Z6 V::J '3~ONIS13 3>tVl '3^V OlV3H 31MOH ..:l..:l3r '~V'l I ! I II ! tl u I ~: 00 I II !I , ~ ~I ;1:_ 0~0 I !I II I II 0 t I I 0 I i i i t I : ; .1 i I~ i II III Pli1rli II II ! I!! Ii ~ I' I' ~ II I !I_!l ~ !! i! H! I ~~0~ Q 1.wINICI ttIllItI Q"I -- JW'W.......... 0...... ...... "IQW .IJI:) ... --. CX)QI """ ..... _ _ _ --!!!!!!....,...!!!"'CI~ ~d ,.~:i.,: ~,..,~..~., :.u\", -6W ~~" - - -..~oiii~ ...., MIIHO-..cI: ...... Iii m (~.......Qt -- ....-w~dloW_ .. - .. - -- ------- ,.; 9LO-L9L-vL~ # :N'd'V -::..~+-=- NVld 3dV::>SONVI 'i NVld 311S - --: =- I ..- I (f) f<C I , i Ii : ii - I aa i .- I u u' I I n Ie:. .. 3" .. I ;! I II'~ j <:( 'I t II ~ ~ 113 i~ Ii, II ~ullli;iii~ll~u~ ~lIlh~hdnIBI I!IJ~ ~ Uif ffir ~ ~~~~! L . ~ i ~ 5i o >1 J ~ I~ Ii ~5 x I~ ~ I i Il I Z I i ill!! ~ llllll UU~ ~ U!uo II ii il I .I@ ~ Q ~ I ~I it !~d I 1 . , , -- - II ~ AGENDA lTEM NO. PACE ~O OF :2.:::r........ OLu \UVUJ orC;;Z6 "'~ '3~ONIS13 3)f'\ll '3^'" OlV3H 31MOH ..:l..:l3r '~r4 tal _ 1111 JlWJ --m;.....,.; 9W-L9L-vLf Ii :N"d'V -::..oa:---:.-==- --. ....- NVld ~OOl..:l ~ I I I . i I If s I l . ~ J II ! . fHB ~! ~! ~ il121 ~ I 2 ~I ~ I I III I I II II I ~ - II!I Ilil!1 ;il .13 ! ~ I ~ ~!il!I~1 i~1 1111 ;; illII I il iii ii i i iiiilii~ili~lll~i ~~I I i Ii ~ ~ I II;illill;IIJ~II~ !il il~illl;llli~li;1 1!1!2 ;Ii i.llliki!!iiil!;!~I~iIIJii ~!I i ~ ~ ~1;I!ill~II!;I;;II!I;II;;!;IIIII!!!!il!i;llillj!!lllli;!iii;!iil!llil~~ilill;!lil~!~j;~ ~(! i 18 III Uil;hlHU i 111'li! !ll ~ liilli~ ~'I r ,rlllbdli .fL-.. 0 ... I hi I n ~ ~ :,( ~I , . ~ -, ~ --- ~'; ~ ~ I IE e ~ I ....... .fw 8~, itil ! ~ .....a ~~ HI! '-- n E II I .. ,,-,- ....- ~:~ ~ "....... h'; III~ ~ 'I ~ In -e- . ~1 I 'I Vll ~ T..-~~-)I ~ ~ " i I i ~ 4- ~ ! "r-o iJ.....l ~r L r ..... A-,L ..... ..... ..... E~ ~.K ..... .....a t ,L'" I AGENDA ITEM NO. PACE._ ~ \ OF :J.;::J1f If OL"'" \VUVI orSZ6 V~ '3~ONIS13 3>lVl .3AV OlV3H 31MOH .:I.:l3r .~I"i WI .. I. WJ .. - ..-ii-*-,.; 9~O-~9~-vLr # :N.d.V -:;...~--:."=.:'" ---.~ NVld .:IOO~ ....-/ ~i il 5l ~ ~I I ! HE ~ ., E I-i ~ qi' II B d) ili I' '111i h I ~ III ! li!l! ~Il~ a Il!l; 'Ii 11!i! I! III ~!iIB J I ~!EI, li~ !~l ,I s !I gb o I .,1 I,! il. ~ ~ ~ t i i t I; I ~ I~ d!~ i ! ii ~ Ii b! ; I~ I~ i qi ~ I ! - '1iLl.~ '3 AGENOA \-rEM NO. ~ } PAGEL ~ ~OF W. I G I N f'l) f<C I , ~::t"v-tn." \UVUJ 1Lft_ "'IC'IJ _..i.w .. \0 ..... '13 MQ:DI LIEN ..... + ........ + ......... -_._~""""'..'......'.....'......, ~--:",':! O~~Z6 V'J '3~ONIS13 3>t'r/l '3^V Ol'r/3H 31MOH .:l.:l3r '~~ 9W-L9L-vL~ # :N'd'V Nlfld NO/!VA313 -1~'" ti .... ~ ~ ...... liE L....._-'-_ Ii ~ III, ~I! I In,: ~ ...L_- :!,i.' 'i,iiiiXIII .: i ~,. I~ 'i!:::,; T i V Ilil ' , :..~ :I&~ ~~. ~ di "11, HI Ii::!' I it ~11i i~ ~ ,.. ~ - · II II i ~ il~ l III i"I" i!:..;W I ' AliI · h, ~p moo h~i ,.' ',' moDo II~ .' iill N II ,"I il i -".r I ij!i.~ ......... ~ 1111 :A, .:, "":, l ~ /1: 111'-:::<..6)':;',>:',(',,".>, ' '",CO' ~ ~ ~ lblltLi'L'<,~i?;;i'!'Y;..?' ~I ".,,'C-O :> ", ,', ,'," 111 ,,". :."t,::' ',', u:l il'r-"- ." /' :n ,tr ',. ~ : ',' -:: ",-~, ~~ I,,' .' "L- ~ ~-.. t I ...... . ! .. I W ;; " ! : ': ""~' "I.", :':,' ::':,1 , J" ~ ':;:1:' ..:>7 -lit ;":'~'," ';.' 1,1 '::i,';:,.':~r':,:::'::: i ':""':':..:'''':r:';,',/ " ,,/, .': 1'.:,,'" :',' ,:': --.....,. " ,.' . , IiI , ,/, ::.' I~l ,.' :: .,." --- ~~ .' ,r:<..::< ts ~ i ....':'1 " I~ Iii i '" .... I; I!il ,.:.' . .",1-,: ",,', 111 1 D, ."J/, ''',' ,,-:1,-, .:':", -..; I' jl~ES :! J <, :',. L' ,"',i ~. , '-,.1" ".': " I," : ,: " il ,: ". I' ,:. I~ ... "....:.,;,,::,':~ -@) I c' ':.':, :I',' ':,". ... .', '~ll (I f ~I " "II .s; ~ ~ ~ ~al t ~ ~ ...... " ,,".. 1.~~ .' 8Sl-1 iii:!i: ~ I;~ . ~ : I l I- I,;: is ~ ',i Ii i [ i II ~III ~I , Ii: :'i~,'i!i ~ II - "II!! -'~--f Is ...... 8 i II~ il~ I~ G ~III !!ll (H" ... ~ ...... I ~ (HI/' J.t ,r O"'!I, , , ..'::, 'iilE::,:: 11ii:'\!', ' ", ",' ,>:,," ":, :.)" " Illii',;:! .~ c, '. ~l ,y '..,' ':" " u:l III! "!iiill'I,'i{ ~ l~ "'li};'1II1 "'.- l..I.:ii\ :':I:UIII :'-( ~ ,iili,"'!!!'IIII:.. ",::', " ' . ',' . ~'.' . . . . . . ii,i:!i!:III~"':' i,ili!i:I,'III~',/'~:: : (.,' g I ...... ad fi I~ ,-. I, Ii ... Il~ :h~ ~ ,.,'" ~[:,,':,:~ @ :: : ,"~: :l J"':," ,', ,.-', j"" ':,,'- :', "I":'''!::': ~ ~ I J1_. m I II ab .. bl a~l ; ~ ~ ! . ...... ~... t .... ACENDA ITEM NO. 3 Dt.r.s: <'\ 1\.," nr: <:'ll ::II:7r r oz."" \UVVJ OrgZ6 V~ '3~ONIS13 3>CVl "3AV GlV3H 31MOH .:l.:l3r '~Vi .... I . I~ := , II ~ it ~ ti~ w. d)! I 9LO-L9L-vLr # :N"d"V SlIV130 ONV SNOll~3S ~N10l1n8 .... I~ :~ ~'t ~I I~ ft .fc I~ ~ I f lal QI n~ld I~I Hi ~&I n~ r' ul I II ~ ; ~ ti~ mi tal.. .tlltYJ na.~,.. .. ~ ~ "J:lIMDCIJI" ...... + 'MlDIIIO + -....- --:~ I -I If Ii ..... I ~ ...J ~ w Q 2 u z t Ie~ II II il R 11111111 ~l L ~ \ \ \~ AGENDA '191 NO. e CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 PREPARED BY: LINDA M. MILLER, PROJECT PLANNER PROJECT TITLE: SIGN PROGRAM NO. 2006-01 FOR PASADENA COMMERCE CENTER! INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-01 APPLICANT: INCHAK LOCKHART, CAPITAL ASSOCIATES, LLC., 13215 PENN STREET, SUITE 300, WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90602 OWNER: MKJ ADNOFF INVESTMENTS, LLC, C/O CAPITAL ASSOCIATES, LLC, 13215 PENN STREET, SUITE 300, WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90602 PROJECT REQUEST The applicant is requesting review and approval of Sign Program No. 2006-01 for an industrial complex known as Pasadena Commerce Center pursuant to Condition of Approval No. 22 for Industrial Design Review No. 2005-01 pursuant to Chapter 17.94 (Sign-Advertising Structures) and Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). PROJECT LOCATION The project is located at 18215, 18267, 18277, and 18283 Pasadena Street within the City's industrial area (APN 377-130-030). AGENDA lTeM NO. 4 PAGE.... \ OF _ ex. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 PAGE 3 of4 PROJECT TITLE: SIGN PROGRAM NO. 2006-01 FOR PASADENA COMMERCE CENTER INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-01 - APN 377-130-030 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Sign Program The proposed Sign Program provides detailed information for all signs that will be allowed within the Pasadena Commerce Center project including location of all signs, sign area allowed, font type, lettering size, and colors allowed. The following list further details the items included in the proposed Sign Program: 1. Intent and Definitions; General Landlord/Tenant Requirements; and General Specifications. 2. Materials and Workmanship; Prohibited Signs; Approvals 3. Tenant Wall Sign Specifications 4. Thru 7. Tenant Wall Sign Placement for Buildings A thru Building D 8. Door Vinyl Details 9. Monument Sign Specifications IO.Site Plan II.Landscape Plan for Monument Signs ANALYSIS The applicant has worked with Staff to produce the Sign Program under consideration. The Sign Program provides the detail needed to review and approve signs as they are submitted for approval for the buildings within the Pasadena Commerce Center, meets the requirements found within Chapter 17.94 (Sign- Advertising Structures) of the LEMC. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION This project as proposed has been found to be Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15311, Accessory Structures, Class 11 (a), On-premise signs, of the California Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA). AGENDA \TEM NO._ ~q PACE ~...OF_ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 PAGE 40f4 PROJECT TITLE: SIGN PROGRAM NO. 2006-01 FOR PASADENA COMMERCE CENTER INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-01 - APN 377-130-030 STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2006-_ approving Sign Program No. 2006-01 for an industrial complex known as Pasadena Commerce Center (Industrial Design Review No. 2005-01) located at 18215, 18267, 18277, and 18283 Pasadena Street (APN 377-130-030) based on Findings, Exhibits and subject to Conditions of Approval. Prepared by: Linda M. Miller, AICP, Project Planner Approved by: LJJmJ~ Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Director of Community Development ATTACHMENTS 1. VICINITY MAP 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 3. PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 4. CEQA - NOTICE OF EXEMPTION 5. SIGN PROGRAM ACENDA IT~M NO. ~ PACE.... ~ A..OF ~ VICINITY MAP SIGN PROGRAM FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. 2005-01 PASADENA COMMERCE CENTER PLANNING COMMISSION ACENDA ITEM NO. It PACE ~ '" OF ~ RESOLUTION NO. 2006- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF SIGN PROGRAM NO. 2006-01 FOR PASADENA COMMERCE CENTER/INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-01 LOCATED AT 18215, 18267, 18277 AND 18283 PASADENA STREET (APN 374-161-016) WHEREAS, Inchak Lockhart has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting review and approval of Sign Program No. 2006-01 for Industrial Design Review No. 2005-01 which is located at 18215, 18267, 18277 and 18283 Pasadena Street (the "Project"). The application was submitted pursuant to Chapter 17.94, (Sign-Advertising Structures) and Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC); and WHEREAS, Section 17.82.100(B) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code ("LEMC") authorizes the Community Development Director or his/her designee to approve, deny, or conditionally approve Minor Design Review applications for sign projects pursuant to Chapter 17.94; and WHEREAS, Section 17.82.100(H) of the LEMC permits the Community Development Director to elect to submit any Minor Design Review to the Planning Commission when in the Director's opinion the project may affect properties other than the applicant's and additional public notification and input is warranted; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that pursuant to LEMC Section 17.82.100 that the Project should be submitted to the Planning Commission for consideration given its potential to affect property owners aside from the applicant; and WHEREAS, notice of the Minor Design Review has been given and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item on September 5, 2006. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Sign Program and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and determines that AGENDA 'TEM NO. 4 PACE 5 ... OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_ PAGE20F3 this project is consistent with the LEMC and is exempt from further environmental clearance under Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Section 15311. SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the LEMC, the following findings for the approval of the project have been made as follows: 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project is located. The General Plan and Zoning Code requires that signs be compatible with the overall architecture of industrial buildings, coordinate with the colors proposed and be in proportion and scale of the building. The buildings of this industrial complex were designed with designated area for each tenants sign area. The Sign Program provides details of these sign areas including the exact size, lettering size, font, and colors allowed. The Sign Program also details allowable signs for all windows and doors. The Project complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan's Land Use Element for the Limited Industrial area. 2. The project complies with the directives contained in LEMC Chapter 17.94 and all other applicable provisions of the LEMC. The Project will meet the requirements of LEMC Chapter 17.94, which include regulating the size, color, lettering type, and location as of all signs within the industrial complex, thus creating a visually pleasing, non- detractive relationship between the industrial buildings and the proposed signs. The Sign Program included both text and visual aids for each sign proposed. 3. Subject to the Conditions of Approval imposed on the Project, the Project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. The Project, as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City divisions, departments and agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment. It is hereby found and determined that the Project is exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Section 15311, Accessory Structures, Class 11 (a), On- premise signs. AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ PAGE L OF 3.- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE30F3 SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of September, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ PAGEl OF ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A SIGN PROGRAM NO. 2006-01 FOR PASADENA COMMERCE CENTER/INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. 2005-01 LOCATED ON PASADENA STREET APN 377-130-030 PLANNING DIVISION 1. Prior to issuance of any sign permit the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions" form and shall return the executed original to the Planning Division for inclusion in the case records. 2. The applicant shall apply for a sign permit and pay appropriate fee for any sign installed at the project site. 3. The location, size, style, and color for all signs shall comply with the Sign Program. Any additions or revisions to the Sign Program shall require Planning Division review and approval. 4. Only the business identification signs as shown in the Sign Program will be allowed on windows. No other permanent or temporary signs including advertising signs shall be allowed. ENGINEERING DIVISION 5. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit for any work performed in public right of way. 6. The sign monument shall be located outside of public right-of-way. 7. The sign monument shall meet City sight distance requirements. 8. Sign monument shall be approved by Planning and Building Departments. ACENDA ITEM NO. ~ PACE 0 OF ~ Notice of Exemption City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (909) 674-3124 (909) 471-1419 fax Filed With: 0 Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 [8] County Clerk of Riverside County 2724 Gateway Drive Riverside, CA 92507 Project Title: Design Review of Sign Program No. 2006-0 I Project Location (Specific): The proposed project is located at 18215,182,67,18277, and 18283 Pasadena Street (APN 377-130-030). Project Location (City): City of Lake Elsinore Project Location (County): Riverside County Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project: This is a proposal for a Sign Program for four (4) buildings located within the Pasadena Commerce Center also known as Industrial Project No. 2005-01. The Sign Program includes: 1) Intent and DefInitions; 2) Materials and Workmanship; Prohibited Signs; Approvals; 3) Tenant Wall Sign SpecifIcations; 4) Tenant Wall Sign Placement; 5) Door Vinyl Details; and 6) Monument Sign SpecifIcations. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Lake Elsinore Name of Person / Agency Administrating Project: Linda Miller, Project Planner, City of Lake Elsinore Exempt Status: o Ministerial (Section 15073) o Declared Emergency (Section 15071 (a)) o Emergency Project (Section 15071 (b) and (c)) [8] Categorical Exemption (state type and section number): Article 19 Categorical Exemptions Section 15311, Accessory Structures, Class II (a), On-premise signs Reasons why project is exempt: This project meets the exemption requirements pursuant to Section 15311 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Contact Person: Linda M. Miller Telephone Number: (951) 674-3124 x 209 Signed: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Title: Director of Community Development ACENDA ITEM NO.---1-- PACE '\. OF '\ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DA TE: SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 PREPARED BY: CAROLE K. DONAHOE, PROJECT PLANNER PROJECT TITLE: ANNEXATION NO. 78; GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2006-01; PRE-ANNEXA TION ZONE CHANGE NO. 2006-03; MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-03 APPLICANT: MCCUNE & ASSOCIATES, INC., 14970 CHANDLER STREET, CORONA, CA 92880, ATTN: RICK BONDAR OWNER: C & J FAMILY TRUST, 20770 STONYBROOK CIRCLE, RIVERSIDE, CA 92508, ATTN: JON CHRISTENSEN, TRUSTEE PROJECT REQUEST The applicant requests commencement of proceedings to bring 21.13 acres of vacant land into the City boundaries that are currently in the County of Riverside's jurisdiction, and to amend the City's Sphere of Influence and General Plan Land Use Map and pre-zone the property for future development as a specific plan area. No development plan is proposed at this time. PROJECT LOCATION The project site is located adjacent to the easternmost portion of the City of Lake Elsinore. The site is approximately three (3) miles west of Interstate 215 and five (5) miles east of Interstate 15, between Holland Road and Corson A venue. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE \ 5 OF ~~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 ANNEXATION 78, GPA 2006-01, ZC 2006-03, MND 2006-03 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant requests a redesignation of 21.13 acres from County Very Low Density Residential, 1 acre minimum lot size (VLDR) to "East Canyon Hills Specific Plan." He also requests pre-zoning from County Residential Agriculture-I, one acre minimum lot size to "East Canyon Hills Specific Plan." ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Vacant County Residential County Very Low Density Project Site Agriculture-1 (one acre Residential Rural minimum lot size) Communities (0-1 dwellin er acre Scattered residential, County Specific Plan North vacant South Scattered residential, farming, vacant County Rural East Scattered residential, Residential-1 (one acre farming, vacant minimum lot size) West Vacant, hills, water tank Canyon Hills Specific Plan (Single Family Residential-1, 0-2 dwellin s er acre PROJECT ANALYSIS According to Jon Christensen, trustee of the project site, this request is a clean up measure on property that he, his father, grandfather and great grandfather believed was already in the City and part of the 2,OOO-acre acquisition of Christensen property for the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. It wasn't until recently that Mr. Christensen discovered the discrepancy among documents left in storage. AGENDA ITEM ~ PAGE~OF~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 ANNEXATION 78, GPA 2006-01, ZC 2006-03, MND 2006-03 While Mr. Christensen has no immediate development plans, he believes that the property would be best served with a specific plan designation and zoning so that it can meld into the existing Canyon Hills SP or create a separate specific plan. In either event, it could continue the single family residential (0-2 dwellings per acre) already approved within that portion of Canyon Hills, contiguous to the site. Further, through design, the project could buffer existing rural land uses to the east and south, and provide a transitional development from urban to rural uses. Wildomar and Menifee Valley Incorporation Boundaries The subject site is not within the City of Lake Elsinore Sphere of Influence (SOl), as the SOl line does not extend into unincorporated areas on the east side of the City. Although the subject site is not part of the proposed boundaries of the City of Wildomar Incorporation, it is a part of the boundaries ofthe proposed City of Menifee Valley Incorporation, as are all properties surrounding the east and north sides of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. Consequently, Staff spoke with Ms. Darcy Kuenzi, President of the Menifee Action Group, which is actively engaged in the effort to incorporate Menifee. Ms. Kuenzi indicated support for the Christensen's annexation proposal, noting that it would not jeopardize the economic base of their future city, and that it represented a logical, orderly and efficient plan and delivery of services. Her letter of support was received August 18, 2006, and is attached to this Report. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-03 was prepared in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended (Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et seq.); the State Guidelines for Implementation ofCEQA as amended (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15000, et seq.); applicable requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore; and the regulations, requirements and procedures of any other responsible public agency or agency with jurisdiction by law. The City received several comment letters subsequent to the distribution of the Draft AGENDA ITEM 5 PAGEloF~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 ANNEXATION 78, GPA 2006-01, ZC 2006-03, MND 2006-03 Mitigated Negative Declaration. Responses to Comments were prepared and distributed to the commentors. A copy of the Response to Comments is enclosed with this Report. Based upon review of the proposed project, including reviews by the City of Lake Elsinore Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions, and other reviewing agencies, the City has concluded that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was the appropriate document, since the proposed project will not result in any significant effect on the environment. RECOMMENDA TIONS Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following resolutions: 1. Resolution No. 2006-_, recommending to the City Council adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-03. 2. Resolution No. 2006-_, recommending to the City Council adoption of Findings of Consistency with the Multi- Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). 3. Resolution No. 2006-_, recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2006-01. 4. Resolution No. 2006-_, recommending to the City Council approval of Pre- Annexation Zone Change No. 2006-03. 5. Resolution No. 2006-_, recommending to the City Council approval of Annexation No. 78. AGENDA ITEM 5 PAGE~OF~ - REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 ANNEXATION 78, GPA 2006-01, ZC 2006-03, MND 2006-03 CAROLE K. DONAHOE, PROJECT PLANNER /1lJJJtG-- Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit 'A' - Vicinity Map. 2. Resolution No. 2006- _, recommending adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-03. a. Exhibit 'B' - Initial Study & Mitigation Monitoring Program for Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-03 (Separate cover). 3. Resolution No. 2006- _, recommending adoption of Findings of Consistency with the MSHCP. 4. Resolution No. 2006- _, recommending approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2006-01. a. Exhibit 'c' - Color Plat "Existing Land Use and General Plan Designations (Enclosure). 5. Resolution No. 2006-_, recommending approval of Pre-Annexation Zone Change No. 2006-03. a. Exhibit 'D' - Color Plat "Existing Zoning" (Enclosure). 6. Resolution No. 2006-_, recommending approval of Annexation No. 78. a. Conditions of Approval b. Exhibit 'E' - Color Plat "Proposed Annexation" (Enclosure). c. Exhibit 'F' - Plan of Services (Enclosure). 7. Correspondence from Darcy Kuenzi, President, Menifee Action Group, dated August 18, 2006. 8. Draft Notice of Determination and De Minimis Impact Finding. AGENDA ITEM 5 PAGE~OF~ VICINITY MAP ANNEXATION NO. 78, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2006-01, PRE-ANNEXATION ZONE CHANGE NO. 2006-03, MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-03 -~ ga ~ ~ --~ ~ ~ 5 o ------~ -~--1'L I~ ~.- - . -~-::: ---------,---,-, : -T-~T I I L_ r-- I ! ------L~--, I i I ---I HOLLAND RD ~ ~ L I PROJECT SITE L- ~~I ff:jl' ~I ----~ r:c: -@ f~ '~ l~ --~ I ------, I ~ nCRAI9 AVE ~ / r-----------~ ----------- €CRAIG AVE PLANNING COMMISSION EXHIBIT \A/ 1 t' ACENDA ITEM NO. 5 PACE 6 OF a <1 RESOLUTION NO. 2006- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ADOPTION OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006- 03 AND THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM APPERTAINING THERETO, FOR ANNEXATION NO. 78 AND ITS RELATED CASES, ON APPROXIMATELY 21.13+ ACRES LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3.5 MILES WEST OF INTERSTATE 215, SOUTH OF HOLLAND ROAD, NORTH OF CORSON AVENUE, AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 358-130-020 WHEREAS, the C & J Family Trust has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore to annex 21.13 acres into the City boundaries, redesignate certain acreage to City General Plan land use designations, and pre-zone certain acreage to City zoning (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, Annexation No. 78 and its related cases are defined as a "project" under California Public Resources Code Section 21065, which defines a project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code Subsection 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") as an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and which includes the issuance to a person of a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies; and WHEREAS, the Initial Study revealed that the Project may have potentially significant environmental impacts. Nevertheless, it was determined that an environmental impact report was not necessary and that all of the potentially environmental impacts could be mitigated to a level of insignificance. Therefore, it was determined that it would be appropriate under CEQA to prepare Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-03 to address the potentially significant environmental impacts and applicable mitigation measures; and ACENDA ITIM NO. 5 PACE 1 OF ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE 20F3 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council regarding environmental documents; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 5, 2006. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-03 and related Mitigation Monitoring Program prior to recommending to the City Council that the documents be approved. The Planning Commission finds and determines that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-03 and related Mitigation Monitoring Program are adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. SECTION 2. That in accordance with CEQA, State Planning and Zoning Law, and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-03 and the related Mitigation Monitoring Program: 1. Through development of the Project, the immediate natural environment will change from a natural setting to a suburban one. This change is not necessarily considered a substantial or significant degradation to the environment. The Project will not substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, nor will it cause a population to drop below self-sustaining levels. The Project will not eliminate a plant or animal community, nor reduce the number or range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. The site contains no known historical resources. ACENOA ITEM NO. S PACE ~ OF ~~ PLANNING COMMISSIOBN RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE 30F3 2. The Project has individual impacts that can be mitigated to below the level of significance through implementation of the Mitigation Monitoring Program and the conditions of approval. The Project's contribution to cumulative noise impacts are insignificant when considered in light of the contribution to traffic noise resulting from projects within the vicinity. No considerable cumulative impacts will occur as a result of the Project. 3. The Project does not pose any potential adverse effects on human beings. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this fifth day of September, 2006, by the following vote: A YES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development ACENDA ITEM NO. PACE 9. ':> OF d.. ~ RESOLUTION NO. 2006- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE MULTI- SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP), FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS THE CHRISTENSEN ANNEXATION NO. 78, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2006-01, AND PRE-ANNEXATION ZONE CHANGE NO. 2006-03, FOR 21.13 ACRES OF VACANT PROPERTY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3.5 MILES WEST OF INTERSTATE 215, SOUTH OF HOLLAND ROAD, NORTH OF CORSON AVENUE, AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 358-130-020 WHEREAS, the C & J Family Trust has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore to amend the City's General Plan Land Use designation and the City's Official Zoning Map to "East Canyon Hills SP" to allow for the annexation of the subject property into the City of Lake Elsinore (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 6.0 of the MSHCP, those discretionary project approvals which involve land not covered by an MSHCP criteria cell are not required to undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process ("LEAP") and the Joint Project Review ("JPR") processes. However, those projects must be evaluated pursuant to the Plan Wide Requirements as a condition precedent to project approval. Accordingly, the Project was evaluated under said Requirements; and WHEREAS, the Project involves entitlements requiring discretionary review by the Planning Commission and City Council; and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that the City adopt MSCHP consistency findings, regardless of the geographical location of the project, prior to approving any discretionary entitlement; and AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE , <0 OF 5 ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_ PAGE20F5 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of recommending MSHCP consistency findings to the City Council; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 5, 2006. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Christensen applications and their consistency with the MSHCP prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council adopt findings of consistency with the MSHCP. SECTION 2. That in accordance with MSHCP and the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings regarding the consistency of the Project with the MSHCP: 1. The proposed project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City must make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approving the Project. The proposed project includes no development plan, but does require discretionary approvals from the City, including CEQA review. Pursuant to the provisions of the MSHCP, all discretionary development projects within an MSHCP Criteria Area are to be reviewed for compliance through the "Property Owner Initiated Habitat Evaluation and Acquisition Negotiation Strategy (HANS) or equivalent process (e.g. LEAP). The project site is within the MSHCP Lake Elsinore Area Plan; however, it is not within a Criteria Area, and a formal LEAP review of the project is not required. In accordance with the MSHCP, proposed projects outside of the Criteria Area are to be reviewed for consistency with the "Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 PAGE~OF~\ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE30F5 Guidelines" (MSHCP, S 6.1.2), "Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines" (MSHCP, S 6.1.3), "Additional Survey Needs and Procedures" (MSHCP, S 6.3.2), and "Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines (MSHCP, Section 6.1.4). 2. The proposed project is not subject to the City's LEAP and the County's Joint Project Review processes. The project is not located within an MSHCP Criteria Cell area; therefore, no formal LEAP submittal was required. 3. The proposed project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vemal Pools Guidelines. The project site does not support riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community. The General Habitat Assessment prepared for the project site found a defined swale that supports remnant mulefat shrubs and willow trees. However, the report also found that this area does not support habitat suitable for sensitive species as defined in Section 6.1.2 (Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools) of the MSHCP due to extensive disturbances from agriculture, lack of structural diversity, and prevalence of non-native vegetation. Although this swale does not contain habitat suitable for the support of sensitive natural communities, it may require permitting from regulatory agencies such as the United States Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Game, or the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Should the swale be affected by any future development pursuant to the proposed zoning and general plan designation, the jurisdictional regulations applicable to the swale will be determined. The mitigation measures required for attainment of a permit from any of the regulatory agencies will reduce project impacts to below a level of significance. These mitigation measures are incorporated into the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for this project. 4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines. AGENDA ITEM NO. S PAGE~OF~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE40F5 The project site is not located within the NEPSSA as shown on Figure 6-1 of the MSHCP, and therefore, no focused surveys are required. 5. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. The MSHCP requires additional surveys for certain species if the project is located in Criteria Area Species Survey Areas, Amphibian Species Survey Areas With Critical Area), Burrowing Owl Survey Areas With Criteria Area, and Mammal Species Survey Areas With Criteria Areas of the MSHCP. The project site is located only within the area requiring Burrowing Owl Surveys (BO). A burrowing owl habitat and burrow survey was conducted on the project site and corresponding 150-meter buffer zone on October 7, 2005 by Ecological Sciences, Inc. The survey determined that there was no suitable habitat and extensive human activities (such as frequent discing) which would likely preclude the presence of BO on the site. No burrowing owl signs were observed during the habitat assessment and burrow survey. Burrowing Owl is not expected to occur within the proposed project area. 6. The proposed project overall is consistent with the MSHCP. The project site is not located within the MSHCP Criteria Area and therefore, has not been identified by the MSHCP as a potential conservation site. Based upon the above analysis of consistency with the MSHCP and the results of the focused biological surveys which evaluated the project site for potential biological impacts, it is concluded that the proposed project is consistent with the provisions of the adopted MSHCP. 7. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the agency, that the project with the proposed mitigation may have significant effect on the environment. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. AGENDA ITEM NO. S PAGE \'?> OF~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE50F5 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this fifth day of September 2006, by the following vote: A YES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM No.5 PAGE~OF~~ RESOLUTION NO. 2006- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2006-01, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION ON 21.13 ACRES OF VACANT PROPERTY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3.5 MILES WEST OF INTERSTATE 215, SOUTH OF HOLLAND ROAD, NORTH OF CORSON AVENUE, AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 358-130- 020 WHEREAS, the C & J Family Trust has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore to amend the City's General Plan Land Use designation to "East Canyon Hills SP" for property located at Assessor's Parcel No. 358-130-020 (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map; and WHEREAS, public notice of this application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 5, 2006. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed amendment prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment No. 2006-01. s - ACENDA \TE'A NO.__ ~ pACE_ \ 5_0f PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE20F3 SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2006- 01: 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not be: a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. a. The proposed General Plan Amendment has been analyzed relative to its potential to have detrimental effects, and it has been determined that the health, safety and welfare of surrounding residents may be improved as a result of future improvements to infrastructure such as water, sewer, paving and drainage facilities brought to the site as a requirement for any future development. b. The proposed "East Canyon Hills SP" designation will ensure that development standards and design guidelines of the specific plan will be consistently applied throughout the site. c. The General Plan Amendment proposes a boundary adjustment to allow for a seamless integration of the Property with the adjacent Canyon Hills Specific Plan, while remaining sensitive to the neighboring rural residential land uses to the east. d. Access to any future development of the site is expected to be from the west. In addition, infrastructure to support future development on the Property will likely tie into existing infrastructure to the west. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 PAGE lli OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE30F3 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this fifth day of September 2006, by the following vote: A YES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABST AIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM NO. t; PAGE \1. OF ~ RESOLUTION NO. 2006- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF PRE-ANNEXA TION ZONE CHANGE NO. 2006-03, CHANGING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE SUBJECT TO THE COMPLETION OF ANNEXATION NO. 78, BRINGING 21.13 ACRES OF VACANT PROPERTY INTO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3.5 MILES WEST OF INTERSTATE 215, SOUTH OF HOLLAND ROAD, NORTH OF CORSON AVENUE, AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 358-130-020 WHEREAS, the C & J Family Trust has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore to change the City's official zoning map to "East Canyon Hills SP" for the property located at Assessor's Parcel No. 358-130- 020 (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the pre-zoning designations conform to and are consistent with the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2006-01 for the Property; and WHEREAS, C & J Family Trust has submitted an application for Annexation No. 78; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to changes to the official zoning map; and WHEREAS, public notice of the application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 5, 2006. AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 PACE \1 OF ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE20F3 NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed pre-zoning prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve Pre-Annexation Zone Change No. 2006-01. SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of Pre-Annexation Zone Change No. 2006-01: 1. The proposed zone change will not be: a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. a. The proposed pre-zoning has been analyzed relative to its potential to have detrimental effects. It has been determined that the health, safety and welfare of surrounding residents may be improved as a result of future improvements to infrastructure such as water, sewer, paving and drainage facilities brought to the site as a requirement for any future development. b. The proposed "East Canyon Hills SP" zoning will ensure that development standards and design guidelines of the specific plan will be consistently applied to the entirety of the site. 2. The proposed zone change will be consistent with the proposed General Plan Amendment. a. Both the zoning and the general plan designation are proposed to be "East Canyon Hills Specific Plan. " SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 PAGE~OF~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE30F3 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this fifth day of September 2006, by the following vote: A YES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABST AIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM NO. S PAGE~ OF ID RESOLUTION NO. 2006- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX THE TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS ANNEXATION NO. 78 INTO THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3.5 MILES WEST OF INTERSTATE 215, SOUTH OF HOLLAND ROAD, NORTH OF CORSON AVENUE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 358-130-020 WHEREAS, the C & J Family Trust has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore to annex approximately 21.13 acres from the County of Riverside's jurisdiction into the corporate boundaries of the City of Lake Elsinore and amend the City's Sphere of Influence; and WHEREAS, this proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox- Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (Government Code SS 56000 et seq.: the "Cortese Knox Act"); and WHEREAS, the C & J Family Trust has initiated Pre-Annexation Zone Change No. 2006-03; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to annexations; and WHEREAS, public notice of the application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 5, 2006. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: AC~;~,\ .. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE20F3 SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the request for annexation prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council commence proceedings to annex the subject property. SECTION 2. That in accordance with the Cortese Knox Act, State Planning and Zoning law, and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of Annexation No. 78: 1. The proposed annexation area is contiguous to the City of Lake Elsinore and will not create pockets or islands. The proposed annexation area borders the City of Lake Elsinore. The project proposes reasonable extension of the city boundary area in that the annexation of the proposed parcels will not create any pockets or islands. 2. The proposed annexation will not result in any adverse significant impacts on the environment. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment and is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. 3. The proposed annexation will eliminate an existing undesired pocket of the county area and will assist in the efficient provision of governmental services. The proposed annexation consists of the removal of 62.42 acres of land from the County of Riverside's jurisdiction and placement of the same into the city limits of Lake Elsinore. The annexation area borders the City of Lake Elsinore and is adjacent to the area identified as the Canyon Hills Specific Plan area. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. AGENDA 1TEkl NO. S PAGE~OF~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE30F3 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this fifth day of September 2006, by the following vote: A YES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM NO. S PAGEcr20F ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CHRISTENSEN ANNEXATION NO. 78, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2006-01 PRE-ANNEXATION ZONE CHANGE NO. 2006-03 PLANNING DIVISION 1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, employees, and/or agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its officials, officers, employees, or agents concerning the project attached hereto. 2. The City intends to file a Notice of Determination with the Riverside County Clerk's office within five (5) business days from the approval of this specific plan amendment by the City Council. The applicant shall forward to the Planning Department secretary, a check made payable to the Riverside County Clerk, in the amount of $64.00 to pay for the cost of such filing. This check shall be received by the secretary no more than 48 hours from the approval by the Council. 3. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) adopted for this project, as printed with Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-03. 4. The applicant shall fund the implementation of the MMP through every stage of development. The City shall appoint an environmental monitor who shall periodically inspect the project site, documents submitted by the applicant, permits issued, and any other pertinent material, in order to monitor and report compliance to the City until the completion of the project. 5. The annexation shall comply with the requirements contained in the Cortese- Knox-Herzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (Government Code Sections 56000-56001) and the standards and policies established by the Riverside Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). 6. All entitlements contained herein are subject to the completion and approval of the annexation. AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 5 PAGE ~ '-\ OF d.. ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CHRISTENSEN ANNEXATION NO. 78. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2006-01 PRE-ANNEXATION ZONE CHANGE NO. 2006-03 7. The applicant shall sign and return an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" to the Community Development Department within 30 days of approval. (End of Conditions) ACENDA ITEM NO. 5 PACE ~ S OF ~, Correspondence from Darcy Kuenzi, President Menifee Action Group Dated August 18, 2006 ACENOA ITEM NO. PAGE 16 5 OF 1. '\ . Board of Directors Darcy Kuenzi President Ron Sullivan Vice President Joe Daugherty Treasurer Betty Bouris Secretary Greg Aguilar Chris Carnes Darci Castillejos Mary Flake Richard Giese Lynn Mattocks August 18,2006 Carole K. Donahoe, AICP City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Subject: GPA 2006-01, ZC 2006-03, APN: 358-130-020 Dear Ms. Donahoe, The Menifee Action Group is an organization made up of local community leaders dedicated to supporting and promoting economic progress, well-planned developments and demonstrating leadership throughout the region. We work closely with the chamber of commerce, school districts, the county of riverside and other regional agencies. We are actively engaged in the effort to incorporate Menifee. It has come to our attention that a request has been made by the property owner to annex 21 acres to the City of Lake Elsinore. While a request such as this can evoke an emotional response, fearful that any annexation is encroaching on the boundary of Menifee. However, this particular request does not jeopardize the economic base of the future city and, in the interest of orderly and efficient planning and service delivery; it is a logical request and is hereby supported by the Menifee Action Group. We have confidence in LAFCO staff and the appointed elected officials that they would make decisions that is in the best interest of all affected parties. Best regards, K~ Darcy Kuenzi, President Menifee Action Group P.O. Box 856 Sun City, CA 92586 menifeeaction@yahoo.com AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 PAGE r;).lOF ~ '\ Notice of Determination Mitigated Negative Declaration (In compliance with Section 21 J08 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code) City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (909) 674-3124 (909)471-1419 fax Filed With: 0 Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 [8] County Clerk of Riverside County 2724 Gateway Drive Riverside, CA 92507 Project Tide: Christensen Annexation No. 78, General Plan Amendment No. 2006-01, and Pre-Annexation Zone Change No. 2006-03 State Clearinghouse Number (if submitted to State Clearinghouse): N / A Lead Agency Contact Person: Carole Donahoe, Project Planner Telephone Number: (951) 674-3124 x 287 Project Location (include County): Vacant property in unincorporated Riverside County, located adjacent to the easternmost portion of the City of Lake Elsinore. The site is approximately three (3) miles west of Interstate 215, and five (5) miles east of Interstate 15, between Holland Road and Corson Avenue. Project Description: Commencement of proceedings to bring 21.13 acres of vacant land into the City boundaries that are currendy in the County of Riverside's jurisdiction, and to amend the City's Sphere of Influence and General Plan Land Use Map and pre-zone the property for future development as a specific plan area. No development plan is proposed at this time. This is to advise that the Lake Elsinore City Council (Lead Agency) has approved the above project and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project D will r8J will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was not prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. IX! A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. The Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Program and record of project approval may be examined at: City of lake Elsinore. 130 South Main Street. Lake Elsinore. CA 92530 3. Mitigation Measures r8J were D were not made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A Statement of Overriding Considerations D was r8J was not adopted for this project. Signed: Tide: Director of Community Development Rolfe M. Preisendanz AGENDA ITEM NO. PAOE ~~ OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding Project Title/Location (include County): Annexation No. 78, General Plan Amendment No. 2006-01, Pre- Annexation Zone Change No. 2006-03. Project Location: In the County of Riverside, adjacent to the easternmost portion of the City of Lake Elsinore. The site is approximately three (3) miles west ofInterstate 215 and five (5) miles east ofInterstate 15, between Holland Road and Corson Avenue, and known as APN 358-130-020. Project Description: Commencement of proceedings to bring 21.13 acres of vacant land into the City boundaries that are currently in the County ofRiverside'sjurisdiction, and to amend the City's Sphere ofInfluence and General Plan Land Use Map and pre-zone the property for future development as a specific plan area. No development plan is proposed at this time. Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): Potential significant impacts to wildlife resources have been analyzed, discussed and mitigated in Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-03. The City Council ofthe City of Lake Elsinore finds and determines that this project will not substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, nor will it cause a population to drop below self-sustaining levels. The project will not eliminate a plant or animal community, nor reduce the number or range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. Certification: I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above findings and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Rolfe M. Preisendanz Title: Director of Community Development Lead Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Date: September 26, 2006 ACENDA 'TEM NO. 5 PACE ~\~OF: -Q.~ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 PREPARED BY: CAROLE K. DONAHOE, AICP, PROJECT PLANNER PROJECT TITLE: ANNEXATION NO. 76; GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2006-05; PRE-ANNEXA TION ZONE CHANGE NO. 2006-05; ZONE CHANGE NO. 2006-07; RAMS GATE SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 89-1, FIFTH REVISION; TENT A TIVE TRACT MAP NO. 33725; MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-04 APPLICANT: THE SHOPOFF GROUP, 8951 RESEARCH DRIVE, IRVINE, CA 92618, ATTN: KRISTINE ZORTMAN, PROJECT MANAGER OWNER: TSG LITTLE VALLEY, 8951 RESEARCH DRIVE, IRVINE, CA 92618 PROJECT REQUEST 1. The applicant requests approval of Annexation No. 76 and the commencement of proceedings to bring 62.42 acres into the City boundaries currently in the County of Riverside's jurisdiction, but within the City's Sphere of Influence area. 2. The applicant requests approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2006-05 to redesignate of 47.71 acres from County Very Low Density Residential, 1 ACENDA liEM NO. ~ PAGE \ Of 6, REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 ANNEXATION 76 ET.AL., RAMS GATE SPA 5, TTM 33725, MND 2006-04 acre minimum lot size (VLDR) to Ramsgate Specific Plan; 14.71 acres from County VLDR to Low Density, 3 dwelling units per acre; and 4.99 acres from City Very Low Density Residential, 0.5 dwelling units per acre, to Ramsgate Specific Plan. 3. The applicant requests approval of Pre-Annexation Zone Change No. 2006- 05 to add to the Official Zoning Map 47.71 acres from County Rural Residential, ~ acre minimum lot size (RR) to Ramsgate Specific Plan, and 14.71 acres from County RR to R-E Estate Single Family Residential, ~ acre minimum lot size. 4. The applicant requests approval of Zone Change No. 2006-07 to rezone 4.99 acres from City Rural Residential, 2 acre minimum lot size, to Ramsgate Specific Plan. 5. The applicant requests approval of Ramsgate Specific Plan No. 89-1 Fifth Revision, which adds 52.7 acres of vacant land for residential development to the northeastern portion of the SP as new Planning Area 10. 6. The applicant requests approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 33725, to subdivide 52.7 acres for the construction of221 single family residential lots, five (5) water quality basins, and twenty-five (25) open space lots. PROJECT LOCATION The Ramsgate Specific Plan (Ramsgate SP) is located approximately one mile east of Interstate 15, south of Highway 74, and west of Greenwald Avenue. The site of Annexation No. 76 and Pre-Annexation Zone Change No. 2006-05 (ZC 2006-05) is located south of Little Valley Road, north of Scenic Crest Drive, west of Greenwald, and east of Grassy Meadow Drive, and known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 349-240-043 thru 047; 349-240-050 and -051; 349-240-054 thru -058; 349-380-024 and -025. AGENDA ITEM L PAGE 2- OF 1:1 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 ANNEXATION 76 ET.AL., RAMS GATE SPA 5, TTM 33725, MND 2006-04 The site of proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 33725 (TTM 33725) and Zone Change No. 2006-07 (ZC 2006-07) is located south of Little Valley Road, west of Greenwald, east of Grassy Meadow Drive, and both north and south of Scenic Crest Drive, and known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 349-240-006; 349-240-043 thru -047; 349-240-054 thru -056; 349-380-024 and -025. General Plan Amendment No. 2006-05 covers the annexation area as well as the 5 acres already in the City and a part ofTTM 33725. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Vacant, under Ramsgate Specific Plan Ramsgate Specific Plan Project Site construction, Rosetta Canyon residential nei hborhoods Scattered residential, North Peak Specific Plan North Peak SP, Future S North vacant RR Rural Residential, Low Density Residentia Coun 3 dwellin s/acre Rl Single Family Low Medium Density (6 South Vacant Residential, dus/ac), Low Density, RR Rural Residential, Future SP, Canyon Cree o en S ace SP Centex Homes & Elsinore RR Rural Residential, Low Density, Tuscany East Hills Elementary, under Tuscany Hills Specific Hills SP construction, vacant Plan West Residential County, RR Rural Business Park, Low Residential, Rl Single Medium Density, Low Famil Residential Densi BACKGROUND The City Council approved the original Ramsgate SP in June 1984, and four (4) subsequent revisions, the latest being in August 22, 2006. With the approval of the Fourth Revision, the Council also approved Tentative Tract Map No. 25475 Revision No.1, the Old Kiln project. AGENDA ITEM h PAGE -3- OF ];t REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 ANNEXATION 76 ET.AL., RAMS GATE SPA 5, TTM 33725, MND 2006-04 PROJECT ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map No. 33725 and Ramsgate Specific Plan 89-1 Fifth Revision TTM 33725 is a logical extension ofthe development already approved within the Old Kiln map, because it lies directly north, across Scenic Crest Drive. TTM 33725 was designed to accommodate the circulation for TTM 25475, as well as the provision of open space and park amenities for both maps. TSG, the applicant for the two maps, was required to provide primary and secondary access roadways, Scenic Crest Drive and Little Valley Road, due to the loss of area conveyed to permanent open space on the west and south boundaries of the Old Kiln tract. The residents of both TTM 33725 and 25475 will enjoy two (2) pocket parks and a trail system central to both tracts, but within TTM 33725. The first park is a "Marsh" passive park on the north side of Scenic Crest Drive, while the second is an active park on the south side of Scenic Crest Drive. Both amenities will include interpretive signage that explains the conservation objectives of the MSHCP open space nearby. Zone Change No. 2006-07 In order to ensure development ofTTM 33725 with Ramsgate Specific Plan standards and guidelines similar to TTM 25475, the applicant is requesting that the area be zoned "Ramsgate Specific Plan." ZC 2006-07 formally requests this zoning on the 5 acre portion ofTTM 33725 that is already in the City. Annexation No. 76 and Pre-Annexation Zone Change No. 2006-05 Annexation 76 and ZC 2006-05 cover that portion of TTM 33725 that is within the County's jurisdiction, but within the City's Sphere of Influence. Additionally, at the request of the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), the applicant has included four (4) outlying parcels in the annexation process, in order to "square off' the boundary line between the City and County in this area, and avoid creating pockets of unincorporated areas. AGENDA ITEM L. PAGE~OFil REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 ANNEXATION 76 ET.AL., RAMS GATE SPA 5, TTM 33725, MND 2006-04 Staff communicated with the property owners of the four (4) outlying parcels, in meetings and by phone. Marilyn MacDonald lives in a mobile home adjacent to her son. Mrs. MacDonald feared increased taxes, and was informed that the Citywide Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District assessment was estimated to be an additional $24.90 per year, which she found acceptable. She indicated that she and her son would both support the annexation. Gary and Susan Fraser explored the options with staff regarding future development of their property, and appreciated the improvements to Little Valley Road that the Ramsgate SP development would provide. Bernardo Ortega resides in Santa Ana, and when contacted, did not express opposition to the annexation. Staff recommends that the four (4) outlying parcels be zoned Residential-Estate, thereby allowing half acre minimum lot sizes and the keeping of animals, which is what these properties currently enjoy in the County. General Plan Amendment No. 2006-05 The GP A covers all properties within TTM 33725 proposed for development using the Ramsgate Specific Plan standards. The GP A also designates the four (4) outlying parcels that are not proposed to be part of the Ramsgate Specific Plan as Low Density, 3 dwelling units per acre in order to allow the half acre zoning that these parcels currently enjoy in the County. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-04 (MND) was prepared in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), as amended (Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et.seq.); the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA as amended (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15000, et.seq.); applicable requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore; and the regulations, requirements and procedures of any other responsible public agency or agency with jurisdiction by law. During the processing of these applications, Staff determined that two zone change cases should be used to clarify the intent of the changes of zone and to simplify the AGENDA ITEM ~ PAGE ~ OF 11 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 ANNEXATION 76 ET.AL., RAMS GATE SPA 5, TTM 33725, MND 2006-04 annexation process, one for the pre-annexation zone change, and another for the rezoning of property already in the City. As a technical matter, the MND describes the entirety of the two zone changes on Page 1, under "Purpose," and analyzes all environmental issues as such. However, the rezoning case number, Zone Change No. 2006-07 is not identified on the cover of this document. After discussions with the property owners of the four (4) outlying parcels, Staff wanted to ensure that the proposed general plan designation for their properties supported the Y2 acre zoning they currently have with the County, contrary to statements made in the MND. Staff believes that because the Y2 acre designation is the same as what exists today in the County, we can rely on the County's General Plan and Environmental Impact Report to support this designation. Based upon review of the proposed project, including reviews by the City of Lake Elsinore Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions, and other reviewing agencies, the City has concluded that the mitigated negative declaration was the appropriate document. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following resolutions: 1. Resolution No. 2006-_, recommending to the City Council adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-04. 2. Resolution No. 2006-_, recommending to the City Council adoption of Findings of Consistency with the Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. 3. Resolution No. 2006 - _, recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2006-05, based upon Exhibit 'C.' 4. Resolution No. 2006 - _, recommending to the City Council approval of Pre- Annexation Zone Change No. 2006-05, based upon Exhibit 'D.' AGENDA JTEM , PAGE~OF D REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 ANNEXATION 76 ET.AL., RAMS GATE SPA 5, TTM 33725, MND 2006-04 5. Resolution No. 2006 - _, recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change No. 2006-07, based upon Exhibit 'E.' 6. Resolution No. 2006 - _, recommending to the City Council approval of Ramsgate Specific Plan No. 89-1 Fifth Revision, based upon Exhibit 'F,' and subject to the Conditions of Approval prepared for Ramsgate Specific Plan No. 89-1 Fifth Revision. 7. Resolution No. 2006 - _, recommending to the City Council approval of Annexation No. 76, based upon Exhibit 'D,' and subject to the Conditions of Approval for Annexation No. 76. 8. Resolution No. 2006 - _, recommending to the City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 33725, based upon Exhibit 'H,' and subject to the Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 33725. PREPARED BY: CAROLE K. DONAHOE, PROJECT PLANNER tf22zmt Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Director of Community Development APPROVED BY: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit' A' - Vicinity Map. 2. Resolution No. 2006- _, recommending adoption of Mitigation Negative Declaration No. 2006-04. a. Exhibit 'B' - Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-04 document (Separate cover). 3. Resolution No. 2006- _, recommending adoption of Findings of Consistency with the MSHCP. AGENDA..]TEM ~ PAGE --L OF D REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 ANNEXA TION 76 ET.AL., RAMSGA TE SPA 5, TTM 33725, MND 2006-04 4. Resolution No. 2006-_, recommending approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2006-05. a. Exhibit 'c' - Little Valley General Plan Amendment. 5. Resolution No. 2006-_, recommending approval of Pre-Annexation Zone Change No. 2006-05. a. Exhibit 'D' - Little Valley Annexation Zone Change. 6. Resolution No. 2006-_, recommending approval of Zone Change No. 2006-07. a. Exhibit 'E' - Little Valley Zone Change No. 2006-07. 7. Resolution No. 2006- _, recommending approval of Ramsgate Specific Plan No. 89-1 Fifth Revision. a. Conditions of Approval. b. Exhibit 'F' - Ramsgate Specific Plan No. 89-1 Fifth Revision document (Separate cover). 8. Resolution No. 2006-_, recommending approval of Annexation No. 76. a. Conditions of Approval. b. Exhibit 'G' - Reorganization Plat. c. Exhibit 'H' - Plan of Services (Separate Cover). d. Exhibit'!, - Fiscal Impact Report (Separate Cover). 9. Resolution No. 2006-_, recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 33725. a. Conditions of Approval. b. Exhibit 'J' - Full-size TTM 33725 (Enclosure) c. Exhibit 'K' - Reduced color illustrative (Enclosure) 10. Draft Notice of Determination and De Minimis Impact Finding AGENDA ITEM ( PAGE 1.- OF ::n VICINITY MAP ANNEXATION NO. 76, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2006-05, PRE-ANNEXATION ZONE CHANGE NO. 2006-05 RAMSGATE SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 89-1 FIFTH REVISION, TTM NO. 33725, MITIGATED NEG DECLARATION NO. 2006-04 fi1k~_ N'd;4~ lfl\/, ~ ...... If-H r---- 7H \l\k:)u \< ...1~ ==r! TL.,r=.' -ku ~=='~<Fl-IT +If MAURICIO ST ,,;;~ --,---'-- u Il Ll /--I~ = == E8 II I) ~ S\:\:.1~ ~ - -r-- == -:j~ I" ~ i::: RIVERSIDE ST""'" ~ i ~) II ..~ ,,1-- ARON'ST I: .. 1"1 , JER~~H DR ~jIll"". U := ~1 ;~f ?l~5475 L / ,,-' '> --- ~ /1' ~.....L ~. ,..c .. ~ ~ ~ FE / 1\ / { '\ I---' '-- I \ L~\ 0 ~ -~< . ~.(;~ ===0 ~. ,,,OJ TTM 34231 = I LIT L VI- LL -.- _...- RD ~~ ~\ -' ~ ./1 \\~ + ~ - ~ <:~~ ~~ - 'fJ!}... SGENIG1GREST1DR- q 1\ PROJECT SITE I - __ J! IJ ~~ ~ t ) ~V ~ ) )~ I' '/'-' U (V .h ~%r~ ml'? ~ . '" \\t~ ~ II II - I PLANNING COMMISION .'~ C~O"''''''''' 'AI c.XHioll ""'C""\ AGENDA IiEM NO. ~ PAGE ~ OF II .. l' RESOLUTION NO. 2006- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ADOPTION OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006- 04 AND THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM APPERTAINING THERETO, FOR ANNEXATION NO. 76 AND ITS RELATED CASES, ON APPROXIMATELY 63.59+ ACRES LOCATED APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 74, AND WEST OF GREENWALD AVENUE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 349-240-006; 349-240-043 THRU -047; 349-240-050 AND -051; 349-240-054 THRU -058; AND 349-380-024 AND -025 WHEREAS, TSG Little Valley has filed applications with the City of Lake Elsinore to annex 63.59 acres into the City boundaries, redesignate certain acreage to City General Plan land use designations, pre-zone certain acreage to City zoning, revise Ramsgate Specific Plan No. 89-1, and to subdivide approximately 52.7+ acres of unimproved property into 221 residential lots, water basins and twenty-five (25) open space lots (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, Annexation No. 76 and its related cases qualify as a "project" under California Public Resources Code Section 21065, which defines a project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code SS 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") as any activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and which includes the issuance to a person of a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies; and WHEREAS, the Initial Study revealed that the Project may have potentially significant environmental impacts. Nevertheless, it was determined that an environmental impact report was not necessary and that all of the potentially environmental impacts could be mitigated to a level of insignificance. Therefore, it was determined that it would be appropriate AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE \ 0 b OF '1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_ PAGE20F3 under CEQA to prepare Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-04 to address the potentially significant environmental impacts and applicable mitigation measures; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council regarding environmental documents; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 5, 2006. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-04 and related Mitigation Monitoring Program prior to recommending to the City Council that the documents be approved. The Planning Commission finds and determines that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-04 and related Mitigation Monitoring Program are adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. SECTION 2. That in accordance with CEQA, State Planning and Zoning law, and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-04 and the related Mitigation Monitoring Program: 1. Through development of the Project, the immediate natural environment will change from a natural setting to a suburban one. This change is not necessarily considered a substantial or significant degradation to the environment. The Project will not substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, nor will it cause a population to drop below self-sustaining levels. The Project will not eliminate a plant or animal community, nor reduce AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 PAGE lL OF. hl. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE30F3 the number or range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. The site contains no known historical resources. 2. The Project has individual impacts that can be mitigated to below the level of significance through implementation of Mitigation Monitoring Program and the conditions of approval. The Project's contribution to cumulative noise impacts are insignificant when considered in light of the contribution to traffic noise resulting from projects within the vicinity. No considerable cumulative impacts will occur as a result of the Project. 3. The Project does not pose any potential adverse effects on human beings. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this fifth day of September, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM NO. L PAGE 0.. OF '11. RESOLUTION NO. 2006- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE MULTI-SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) FOR THE PROJECTS KNOWN AS ANNEXATION NO. 76 ET.AL., RAMSGATE SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 89-1 FIFTH REVISION, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 33725, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 74, AND WEST OF GREENWALD AVENUE WHEREAS, the Shopoff Group has submitted applications for Annexation No. 76, General Plan Amendment No. 2006-05, Pre-Annexation Zone Change No. 2006-05, Zone Change No. 2006-07, Ramsgate Specific Plan No. 89-1 Fifth Revision, and Tentative Tract Map No. 33725 ("Ramsgate Applications") located approximately one mile east of Interstate 15, south of Highway 74, and west of Greenwald Avenue; and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that all projects which lie within an MSHCP criteria cell and which require discretionary approval by the legislative body undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process ("LEAP") and the Joint Project Review ("JPR") processes prior to public review of the project applications; and WHEREAS, the Ramsgate Applications involve entitlements requesting that the City issue a permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement which requires discretionary review by the legislative body; and WHEREAS, the Ramsgate Applications are within MSHCP criteria cell group "I" and were therefore evaluated under the LEAP and JPR process prior to the public hearing on this item on September 5, 2006; and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that the City adopt consistency findings prior to approving any discretionary project entitlements for development projects within MSHCP criteria cells; and ACEt.OA nEM NO.~ _ PAGE \, OF ~( - ,- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_ PAGE20F5 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of recommending MSHCP consistency findings to the City Council; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Ramsgate Applications has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 5, 2006. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Ramsgate applications and their consistency with the MSHCP prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council adopt findings of consistency with the MSHCP. SECTION 2. That in accordance with the MSHCP and the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: MSHCP CONSISTENCY FINDINGS 1. The proposed project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City must make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval. The proposed project includes a tentative tract map and requires a number of discretionary approvals from the City, including CEQA review. Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Resolution, the project has been reviewed for MSHCP consistency, including consistency with "Other Plan Requirements. " These include the Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines (MSHCP, ~ 6.1.2), Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines (MSHCP, ~ 6.1.3), Additional Survey Needs and Procedures (MSHCP, ~ 6.3.2), Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines (MSHCP, ~ 6.1.4), Vegetation Mapping (MSHCP, ~ 6.3.1) AGENDA ITEM NO. b PAGE~OF~6\ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_ PAGE30F5 requirements, Fuels Management Guidelines (MSHCP, ~ 6.4), and payment of the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee (MSHCP Ordinance, ~ 4). 2. The proposed project is subject to the City's LEAP and the County's Joint Project Review processes. The project site is within the MSHCP Lake Elsinore Area Plan. The entire Tentative Tract Map No. 33725 is located in Independent Cell Group (Criteria Cells I 4174 and 4176). Therefore, a formal and complete LEAP application, LEAP 2006-0, 4 was submitted to the City in June, 2006. 3. The proposed project is consistent with the RiparianJRiverine Areas and Vemal Pools Guidelines. No vernal pools exist on the site; therefore, vernal pool species are not expected to occur. Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP focuses on protection of riparian/riverine areas and vernal pool habitat types based on their value in the conservation of a number of MSHCP-covered species, none of which has any potential to occur on the project site. Impacts to riparian habitats on the map site include the 0.22 acres of herbaceous wetland. Remaining impacts to riparian/riverine resources are limited to non-wetland waters of the us. Impacts to the small riparian area and unvegetated drainages will be mitigated through acquisition of credits from the Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District Mitigation Bank, which provides significant enhancement to riparian habitat along the Santa Ana River through removal of giant reed (Arundo donax). A number of the species targeted for conservation through consistency with Section 6.1.2 occur within bank boundaries, and the bank is within the MSHCP Conservation Area boundaries. 4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines. The project site is not located within the NEPSSA as shown on Figure 6-1 of the MSHCP and therefore no focused survey is required. Additionally, no AGENDA ITEM NO. b PAGE \") OF];'t PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE40F5 NEPSSA species were observed duringfocused biological surveys conducted on the project site. Based on its location outside of any NEPSSA and the lack of any NEPSSA species being observed duringfocused surveys, the project is compliant with MSHCP Section 6.1.3. 5. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. The MSHCP requires additional surveys for certain species if the project is located in Criteria Area Species Survey Areas, Amphibian Species Survey Areas With Critical Area, Burrowing Owl Survey Areas With Criteria Area, and Mammal Species Survey Areas With Criteria Areas of the MSHCP. The project site is located outside of any Critical Area Species Survey Area (CASSA) for plants and mammals and no CASSA plant species were observed during the focused surveys for the site. However, the project site is located within the area requiring burrowing owl surveys. A focused burrowing owl survey was conducted on the site during the 2006 breeding season (March 1 - August 31), in accordance with accepted guidelines. The focused survey determined that although the site contains 35 acres of low to moderate potential owl habitat, no burrowing owls were observed on the property and the few burrows with potential to support owls showed no sign of owl occupation. 6. The proposed project IS consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines. Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP sets forth guidelines which are intended to address indirect effects associated with locating development in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area, where applicable. Future Development in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area may result in Edge Effects that will adversely affect biological resources within the MSHCP Conservation Area. To minimize such Edge Effects, guidelines shall be implemented in conjunction with review of individual public and private Development projects in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area. Through implementation of mitigation measures the project will minimize the AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ PAGE ~ OF 6.J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE50F5 identified potential indirect impacts with potential future open space to the south. 7. The proposed project overall is consistent with the MSHCP. The entire project is consistent with the MSHCP and provides effective conservation on the project site to meet the biological issues and considerations of the MSHCP. 8. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the agency, that the project as revised may have significant effect on the environment. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this fifth day of September, 2006, by the following vote: A YES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABST AIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM NO. (...., PAGE Jl OF t\ RESOLUTION NO. 2006- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2006-05 AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION ON 68.59 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF LITTLE VALLEY ROAD, NORTH AND SOUTH OF SCENIC CREST DRIVE, WEST OF GREENWALD AVENUE AND EAST OF GRASSY MEADOW DRIVE, CONTIGUOUS TO THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNARY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 349-240-006; 349-240-043 THRU -047; 349-240-050 AND -051; 349-240-054 THRU -058; 349- 380-024 AND -025. WHEREAS, TSG Little Valley has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore to amend the City's General Plan Land Use designation for the properties located at Assessor's Parcel Nos. 349-240-006; 349-240-043 thru -047; 349-240-050 and -051; 349-240-054 thru -058; 349-380-024 and -025 (the "Properties") to "Ramsgate SP" and "Low Density, 3 dwelling units per acre; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map; and WHEREAS, public notice of the application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 5, 2006. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: AGENDA ITEM NO.J . PAGE \~ OF_"bl. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE20F4 SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed amendment prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment No. 2006-01. SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2006- 01: 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not be: a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. a. The proposed General Plan Amendment has been analyzed relative to its potential to have detrimental effects, and Staff believes that the health, safety and welfare of surrounding residents may be improved as a result of future improvements to infrastructure such as water, sewer, paving and drainage facilities brought to the site as a requirement for any future development. b. The proposed "Ramsgate" designation will ensure that development standards and design guidelines of the specific plan will be consistently applied to all of the Properties. 2. The proposed General Plan Amendment will permit reasonable development of the area consistent with its constraints and will make the area more compatible with adjacent properties. a. The proposed land use designation of "Ramsgate" will allow for the continuation of large lot single family detached residential neighborhoods thus creating continuity between the Properties and the neighboring Canyon Hills Specific Plan which lies to the west. The proposed designation will also provide flexibility in designing the site to be compatible with existing uses along its other three boundaries. AGENDA ITEM NO. b PAGE~OF=bl PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE30F4 3. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use density and usage more in character with the subject property's location, access, and constraints. a. The General Plan Amendment proposes a boundary adjustment to allow for a seamless integration of the property with the adjacent Canyon Hills Specific Plan, while remaining sensitive to the neighboring rural residential land uses to the east. b. Access to any future development of the site is expected to be from the west. In addition, infrastructure to support future development on the Properties will likely tie into existing infrastructure to the west. 4. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment. a. The General Plan Amendment does not propose changes necessarily considered substantial nor significant. Any individual impacts can be mitigated to below a level of significance. Based upon the current scope of the General Plan Amendment, no potential adverse effects have been identified. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this fifth day of September 2006, by the following vote: A YES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission AGENDA ITEM NO. b PAGE ~O OF ]:l. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE40F4 ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM NO. h PAGE~OFn t @ ~ Q i;j l;j '" I ,1'l! I' i '"i:i:'OUI~V1Tla' t=-=~~1,~-..,.~=~-'.., ~~~l. ~~.y.~~C/~. ('~og~~~l 1=-'--'- ___~.t..~.--- ~ ~ I--=--l ~A,,""'1T'-f~lr~" ~ ;~: ~ · I ~ ~~ I " ! ~ ~ Iii ! I ;: ~ I~~ , ild I ~ ~ mn ~ Q. 1'1" i!:esh;;;; ~ '<{ I~ 8r () ~ ~~~Q3 II ~ =l'~~_~~ il I ~ g Uil: ___-,~_ _._ I I I ~ P::7; I co I I-------.-]-~\ "]j,z:"li1Ii-_~;_,d~,7~_ --'!:!~-- (\,1 ! Vi/C/O c:::J'J 1 NO/{Nv3 ' ;; J~<./-,-_l[',. \ ~ Ju/uH',. II , ""C~"'" ~ ,~c U: :1 a~~ \; ~~~ ~~t I I Cl::: ~'" ~ ~) ~, '" ? t I ).... "'I" ~I ;;. '" I C LwI'1 if ~' " ,I ~ :j 1-+..2___- I '" '", I" ~ I" :ii; ,OC;7 l7ia{3A~ -'-~~~1'" t ;!~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~II,',." ; ~ ~I ~~gc5t : -.III ~as--,S! ; IIi ~ \:~__'~2-__J g ~~ ~ 6 , (i;'; \ l"OO,oaOON 0 'w - E ~ ~:~.:'. ~ ' E ~ ~ ;!; i'~ Lw 2 0 ~ ~ !I: i ~ I.\. 0 'I rJ' ~ 2 I iN :5 L~-_.~_JZY'Q~__J!1 1773::JvW --=-==--==~~ -':"=:-:=1 1)=-~\"~~;rI~~~= c:::J11\ 6 Ii Cl:::1 I' G~\ -.J ~~ ~ [iN r::::J II, \-. I 'fl, :::J ! L " I ~ . ~ ~ "~ !l R ~ - e Q) E "C c Q) E <( ell) CO - I 0..'0 o co "'(',1 Q) e . Q) 0 (,!)z ~ ~ CI) :s:: :::i ~ 'w c: C Q) -- o -6 ~ ct) 0_;:: .....o+- ~ C "w Q)--C ::>::JQ) "00 ~.... ". c-'" 5 .9 o ~ E 0 2 .E I.\. III f I- , 2 ~ 0( ~ 1-1 ...I .. ::::l ~ t/)~ 2 ~ o ~ CJ ~ I 2 w 0. iiH ~ i I- [ CJ ~ w 1! .,~ o ~ a: .~ II. If. ~ Lw <: ""C -.I '" '" ~~ Ii oi '" , o '" " I '" '" '" '" Q. '" r' r-_ <: :) o C,) i!l o '" '" '" '" , o '" " , '" '" '" '" Q. '" ~ ~ 1: <3 " ~ C B ~ I LU C) U) Cl" ~ Q " ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ,,~ "- ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ <3~ ~ ~~ ~&1 ~ I I I I I Q). ~ "" ... <;>:-0I>'l-61>'>: Ndl/ g9-OYl-61>'>: Ndl/ " \., . c; ,-, i~-r' ~i\r'~ I t) \ Co / - ACENOA ITEM NO. -b PAGE, ~~ OF_b\_ RESOLUTION NO. 2006- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF PRE-ANNEXATION ZONE CHANGE NO. 2006-05 CHANGING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, SUBJECT TO THE COMPLETION OF ANNEXATION NO. 76, BRINGING 62.42 ACRES OF LAND INTO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE BOUNDARIES, LOCATED SOUTH OF LITTLE VALLEY ROAD, NORTH AND SOUTH OF SCENIC CREST DRIVE, WEST OF GREENWALD AVENUE AND EAST OF GRASSY MEADOW DRIVE, CONTIGUOUS TO THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNARY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 349-240-043 THRU -047; 349-240-050 AND -051; 349-240-054 THRU -058; 349-380-024 AND - 025 WHEREAS, TSG Little Valley has submitted an application with the City of Lake Elsinore to change the City's official zoning map to "Ramsgate SP" and "R-E Estate Single Family Residential, 1/2 acre minimum lot size for the Assessor's Parcel Nos. 349-240-043 thru -047; 349-240-050 and - 051; 349-240-054 thru -058; 349-380-024 and -025 (the "Properties"); and WHEREAS, the pre-zoning designations conform to and are consistent with the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2006-05 for the Properties; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to changes to the official zoning map; and WHEREAS, public notice of the application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 5, 2006. AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 PACE ~1_0F 61- . .. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE20F3 NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed pre-zoning prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve Pre-Annexation Zone Change No. 2006-05. SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of Pre-Annexation Zone Change No. 2006-05 : 1. The proposed zone change will not be: a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed zone change or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. a. The proposed zone change has been analyzed relative to its potential to have detrimental effects. It has been determined that the health, safety and welfare of surrounding residents may be improved as a result of future improvements to infrastructure such as water, sewer, paving and drainage facilities brought to the site as a requirement for any future development. The proposed "Ramsgate SP" zoning will ensure that development standards and design guidelines of the specific plan will be consistently applied throughout the site. b. The proposed "R-E Estate Single Family Residential, ~ acre minimum lot size" zoning will enable existing land uses to continue on the four (4) outlying parcels that exist today in the County, including the keeping of horses. 2. The proposed zone change will permit reasonable development of the area consistent with its constraints and will make the area more compatible with adjacent properties. a. The proposed zoning of "Ramsgate SP" will allow for the continuation of the single family residential neighborhood already AGENDA ITEM NO. ? P AGE~ OF 11. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE30F3 approved across Scenic Crest Drive m Tentative Tract Map No. 25475 Revision No. 1. 3. The proposed zone change would establish a land use density and usage more in character with the subject property's location, access, and constraints. a. The zone change proposes a boundary adjustment to allow for a seamless integration of the property with the adjacent Ramsgate Specific Plan. b. The zone change allows for the development of the site in accordance with proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 33725, which provides primary and secondary accessfor both TTM 33725 and 25475. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this fifth day of September 2006, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABST AIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ PAGE ~SOF _0 \.. t ~ Q) C) c C .s::. o Q) &: .sit) cO o~ +=0 Co ~N C . C 0 <(Z ~ ~ Q) ~ ::::i >- == E E:Jo oE:;:::'i' LL. ._ I: N 0) I: 0) .- .- -0 <I) "6l E 'j;) '0 .5 - 0) - CI).QCl::E O)O)c:::::J o,,:;E 1iiOCl::'C LLI ~ .- -o~...E - I: ~o:::::J~ 0)'_ 00 -ocOO .- 0) E (1)-0 ~.- o~ .... <I) .... 0)- ~CI:: ~ I I III I ~~M'W. r~J1J'l~l.-. .~.~~~f_t.._._'~~..'O::.~~l.._ I ---=--, I\~~"" ~~-~ I I :' ;io'iog- ,- I Ii "'&\.[1:';o.v I ,N I I ~ I h zz I " '~ I~~.: ; . ~ ~, 2tCt~ ~ ~~? ~ !~; ~l ~.I~ ~ <: II: ~_ ~I ~ ~ IN" ~ ~ IN --~ IF~ -"- - ,gl 31/110'J4,.iifitNVJL : E - ""C ~i;;I< 'i' .-\ f", '" II ... C a~:'; ''''i fl.J.\ ';;l...~'<;t II' .::;::: - G::: 50. d, ! -q \ ~ :::; ';' -0 I: 0) I~ '." ; "', .' 0, """ Q) Q).!::!>-~t') \~/~ ~ :E :2'= It.J II. ~ \J '" I ' '-' - U) 0 :j t-+-'Z .. _ _ I ~ I: 0) 0) - ~ N .0 Zqg J " 77 !:ON .Q " ~ E ~i I,i""" A. ~ 2 :::::J It.Jil' !tH~~n,.. ~CI)cw; 5 ~ N :g 6 .! 0 0 II ~ ~ 0 ~ ~IJ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~M ~ "CI:: . K ~ ~ I 1 f; / f--J I ~ I J. II l~_____ OVOL_J l'l/nJtJvJ1 \ ! ~ ' -'---=-= -~, im""'S;;;%''',;;;i~,~ ~ ; ~W ~ : ~~ ~ ~ ~, 1i: It.J1!~\ ~ () q " ~ i I; '" U (.) ~ ::J i1' ~ ~ ~ i ~ Cr: V) ~ ~ ~ Q: .., <: Q " ~ ~ ~ ~ A. C :::I"" >-~ I-q -'" Z (3 :; I II I I II 1 ,I II I I ! I : I Ii II I, I I ,n.r ].00,00:00;; -1 I I I ~ @J ~ '-' ~k t'\j .q:.. ~ EJ ~ ~I~ ;:!; ~ ~I <: I ~ I I I I __'~~__J ].OO,oaOON Lu Cr: () <: li) cj ~ <:( -J es f-.:::: tJ G G::: C) a /"2\ I" \ I '" I I,), \ "- '- <;r O~Z-6~r Nd'o' g9-0~Z-6~r Nd'o' EXHIBIT '])/ ~ z ""~~ o i!:~t;; -i:si:sll! '" I- ~l/),"," ~ e: ~~~ is a:: ~~<:; i;! o ~~O:" !li o..(,:)~~ (I) ~j;"'~ ~i W ~-Jll)~ ~ C ~1'1~~ .. 2;~!;;~ ~ .... ~cee~ II :! i5i:s[(i~ i1j ~ J:::::cc:::.CS 'OC( W ~~~~ :<i .... ""(.}~~ e ~ ~ I: o '" I;; Q B ~l '" :5>- ~~ ~ eiiS ~ ~~ 2: ~~ ~~ ~ i~ S~ : _"'t ~D::l ~ I I I I I ~ - H 15 .l id III f I- , z~ ~ i ..I .. ::J ~ Ill::: Z ~ o ~ Ue 5 z ~ ~. ~ .~ Q ~ I- & U i w ~ ..,- o !1' lIC I a. ~ ~ ~~ ri ffiC,j :t ~ AGENDA 'TEM NO. b PACE ~b_oF_fl-= RESOLUTION NO. 2006- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 2006-07 CHANGING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, LOCATED SOUTH OF SCENIC CREST DRIVE, WEST OF GREENWALD AVENUE AND EAST OF GRASSY MEADOW DRIVE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 349-240-006 WHEREAS, TSG Little Valley has submitted an application with the City of Lake Elsinore to change the City's official zoning map to "Rams gate SP" for Assessor's Parcel No. 349-240-006 (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the zone change designation conforms to and is consistent with the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2006-05 that covers the Property; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to changes to the official zoning map; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 5, 2006. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed zone change prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve Zone Change No. 2006-07. AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 PAGE ~l OF - 61-- -- --... - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE 20F3 SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of Zone Change No. 2006-07: 1. The proposed zone change will not be: a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed zone change or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. a. The proposed zone change has been analyzed relative to its potential to have detrimental effects. It has been determined that the health, safety and welfare of surrounding residents may be improved as a result of future improvements to infrastructure such as water, sewer, paving and drainage facilities brought to the site as a requirement for any future development. The proposed "Ramsgate SP" zoning will ensure that development standards and design guidelines of the specific plan will be consistently applied throughout the site. 2. The proposed zone change will permit reasonable development of the area consistent with its constraints and will make the area more compatible with adjacent properties. a. The proposed zoning of "Ramsgate SP" will allow for the continuation of the single family residential neighborhood already approved in Tentative Tract Map No. 25475 Revision No.1 that lies to the west. 3. The proposed zone change would establish a land use density and usage more in character with the Property's location, access, and constraints. a. The zone change proposes a boundary adjustment to allow for a seamless integration of the Property with the adjacent proposed Ramsgate Specific Plan. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. ACENDA ITEM NO. ~ PAGE l), ~ OF _ bl ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE 30F3 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this fifth day of September 2006, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development ACEN~:~~M~~.* APN 349-240-54-56 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SITE VICINITY MAP SCENIC CREST DRIVE LAKE ELSINORE ~ ~ o 100 200 ~ GRAPHICAL SCALE SCALE: 1" = 200' ~g ~~ ~~ RIVERSIDE ST <3 SEC. 28 SCENIC CREST DR LAKE ELSINORE NO SCALE Little Valley Zor'e Change No.2006- 07 ~ LI TTLE VALLEY ROAD ~ ~ '<;;j- I a '<;;j- C'\J I 0) '<;;j- ~ <: Q "-C '<;;j- '<;;j- I a '<;;j- C'\J I 0) '<;;j- ~ <: Q "-C ls! R: !::l ~ :>:: ~ G '<;;j- C'\J I a CX) ~ I 0) '<;;j- ~ <: Q "-C lr) C'\J I a eX) ~ I 0) '<;;j- ~ <: Q "-C .L.J I o ' ,0 I "J o IX:l S2l~ ~lL- .L.J I 0' o "J -aIDj S2l ~ ~I .--J *APN 349-240-006 ~ N89'30'48"E --- 662.7' From Rural Residential (2 acre minimum lot size) to Ramsgate Specific Plan LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PORTION OF THE UNINCORPORA TED AREA OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, LYING IN PORTIONS OF SECTION 27 AND 28, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNADINO BASE AND MERIDIAN. TOTAL AREA = 4.99 ACRES, MORE OR LESS RIVERSIDE COUNTY LEGEND XXXXXXXX EXISTING CITY LIMITS - - - INDICA TES ZONE CHANGE ~ BOUNDARY / PROPERTY BOUNDARY ~ NET AREAS ~ PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTANTS 701 B Stree~ Suite BOO San Diogo. CA92101 619.235.6471 Tel 619.234.0349 Fax Planning I Landscape Architecture I Environmental I Engineering I Survey 'E/ rJ/ ~i,i1iBrr ACENDt'\ nfM NO. PACE 30 OF b 1. RESOLUTION NO. 2006- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF RAMSGATE SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 89-1 FIFTH REVISION, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE EAST OF INTERESTATE 15, SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 74, AND WEST OF GREENWALD AVENUE. WHEREAS, the Shopoff Group filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore to amend the Ramsgate Specific Plan No. 89-1; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to changes to approved specific plans; and WHEREAS, public notice of the application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 5, 2006. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Ramsgate Specific Plan No. 89-1 Fifth Revision (the "Fifth Revision") prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed amendment. SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and Chapter 17.99 (Specific Plan District) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for approval of the Ramsgate Specific Plan No. 89-1 Fifth Revision: 1. The location and design of the proposed development is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan and with any other ACENDA ITEM NO. i PAGE 3 \ _ OF h 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_ PAGE20F4 applicable plan or policies adopted by the City, or in the process of being prepared and adopted. a. The General Plan supports the development of the Ramsgate Specific Plan. The Fifth Revision adds acreage to the General Plan that is contiguous to its eastern boundary, and supplements Planning Area 6, which lost three-fourths of its original acreage to open space preservation. The Fifth Revision has been reviewed and conditioned to enhance and update the Ramsgate Specific Plan Fourth Revision. b. The Fifth Revision has been designed to support the objectives of the Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan adopted by the City, by preserving habitat areas identified in the Conservation Plan. c. The Fifth Revision has been presented to the General Plan Advisory Committee charged with the preparation of the Draft General Plan Update, and received a favorable response. 2. The proposed location allows the development to be well-integrated with or adequately buffered from its surroundings, whichever may be the case. a. The Fifth Revision provides for the development of low-medium density residential, as an extension of the single family detached residential neighborhoods within Planning Area 6. In so doing, both Planning Areas 6 and 10 have primary and secondary access from Greenwald Avenue. b. The Fifth Revision increases the single family neighborhood on the eastern portion of the Plan, in both size and amenities, providing three neighborhood parks, and compensating for the loss of acreage in this portion of the Plan to the preservation of open space. 3. All vehicular traffic generated by the development, either in phased increments or at full build-out, is to be accommodated safely and without causing undue congestion upon adjoining streets. a. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared by Urban Crossroads in October 2005, which determined that the proposed project will generate 2,211 trip-ends daily with 173 in the a.m. peak period and AGENDA ITEM NO. c., PAGE 31-0F 1;1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE30F4 233 in the p.m. peak period. The TIA identified that traffic from the project will use Scenic Crest Drive and Greenwald Avenue. As a secondary highway, Greenwald has the capacity for 35,000 vehicle trips. The project will not cause this capacity to be exceeded. b. The City of Lake Elsinore General Plan states that the objective of the City is to "strive to maintain a minimum Level of Service 'C' at all intersections during non-peak hours and Level of Service (LOS) 'D' at all intersections during peak hours to ensure that traffic delays are kept to a minimum. " With the incorporation of mitigation measures in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, the project will meet LOS 'D' objective, except for the intersection of River Road at State Route 74 in the County. 4. The Final Specific Plan shall identify a methodology to allow land uses to be adequately serviced by existing or proposed public facilities and servIces. a. The Fifth Revision has been reviewed and conditioned to provide adequate public services for the site. b. The Fifth Revision provides recreational amenities, pedestrian pathways, and open space for residents in the low-medium density residential development. 5. The overall design of the Specific Plan shall produce an attractive, efficient and stable development. The proposed Revision will allow the construction of a more substantial and complete single family neighborhood in the eastern portion of the Plan, with parks and amenities and primary and secondary access to Greenwald Avenue. 6. In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), impacts have been reduced to a level of non- significance through adoption of mitigation measures and conditions of approval. AGENDA ITEM NO. b PAGE '32 OF IT PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE 4 OF 4 SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this fifth day of September 2006, by the following vote: A YES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA ITE.,M NO. C-. PAGE~OFn CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RAMSGATE SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 89-1 FIFTH REVISION LOCATED APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE EAST OF INTERESTATE 15. SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 74 AND WEST OF GREENWALD AVENUE PLANNING DIVISION 1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, employees, and/or agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its officials, officers, employees, or agents concerning the project attached hereto. 2. The City intends to file a Notice of Determination with the Riverside County Clerk's office within five (5) business days from the approval of this specific plan amendment by the City Council. The applicant shall forward to the Planning Department secretary, a check made payable to the Riverside County Clerk, in the amount of $64.00 to pay for the cost of such filing. This check shall be received by the secretary no more than 48 hours from the approval by the Council. 3. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) adopted for this project, as printed with Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-04. 4. The applicant shall fund the implementation of the MMP through every stage of development. The City shall appoint an environmental monitor who shall periodically inspect the project site, documents submitted by the applicant, permits issued, and any other pertinent material, in order to monitor and report compliance to the City until the completion of the project. 5. The SPA shall comply with the terms of the Development Agreement and its Operating Memorandums of Understanding by and between the City of Lake Elsinore and the applicant. 6. The applicant shall sign and return an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" to the Community Development Department within 30 days of approval. 7. The applicant shall submit 15 final revised copies upon approval of Ramsgate Specific Plan No. 89-1 Fifth Revision if necessary to complete the processing of this application. (End of Conditions) ACENDA!TDI NO. k PACE_3S _OF - -- RESOLUTION NO. 2006- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX THE TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS ANNEXATION NO. 76 INTO THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE LOCATED SOUTH OF LITTLE VALLEY ROAD, NORTH OF SCENIC CREST DRIVE, WEST OF GREENWALD, AND EAST OF GRASSY MEADOW DRIVE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 349-240-043 THRU - 00047; 349-240-050 AND -051; 349-240-054 THRU -058; 349-380-024 AND -025. WHEREAS, The Shopoff Group has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore to annex approximately 62.42 acres of land that fall within the City of Lake Elsinore's Sphere of Influence, into the corporate boundaries of the City of Lake Elsinore; and WHEREAS, this proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox- Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (Government Code gg 56000 et seq.: the "Cortese Knox Act"); and WHEREAS, the Shopoff Group has initiated Pre-Annexation Zone Change No. 2006-05; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to annexations; and WHEREAS, public notice of the application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 5, 2006. b AOENDA ITEM NO.~ bJ = PAGE 2b OF_ -- - ------- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE20F3 NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the request for annexation prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council commence proceedings to annex the subject property. SECTION 2. That in accordance with Cortese Knox Act, State Planning and Zoning law, and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of Annexation No. 76: 1. The proposed annexation area is contiguous to the City of Lake Elsinore, is within the City of Lake Elsinore Sphere of Influence, and will not create pockets or islands. The proposed annexation area borders the City of Lake Elsinore, is within the City of Lake Elsinore's Sphere of Influence and is adjacent to the area identified as the Canyon Hills Specific Plan area. The project proposes reasonable extension of the city boundary area in that the annexation of the proposed parcels will not create any pockets or islands. 2. The proposed annexation will not result in any adverse significant impacts on the environment. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment and is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. 3. The proposed annexation will eliminate an existing undesired pocket of the county area and will assist in the efficient provision of governmental services. The proposed annexation consists of the removal of 62.42 acres of land from the County of Riverside's jurisdiction and placement of the same into the city limits of Lake Elsinore. The annexation area borders the City of Lake Elsinore and is adjacent to the area identified as the Canyon Hills Specific Plan area. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 PAGE)l OF=q PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE30F3 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this fifth day of September 2006, by the following vote: A YES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEJi4.,NO. ~ PAGE)jOF U EXHIBIT' A · REORGANIZATION TO INCLUDE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AND DETACHMENT FROM THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE I , 74 t 1 I 22 20~' ~ 2~ 29 28,,~-:-1' -I ~ - 28 27 . I ~! :p_~J~" I (LA.<E flSINrY/E ~_j__~8!1~_~I_ _2~ _ ~ L___:'2___.:':'.___......______.~__'.~ VICINITY MAP NO SCALE ~ ! ~ ~ ~ L, ~ PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTANTS P1anroing I Londscapo Architecture I Environmentell Engineering I Survey 701 B Street, Suite BOO San Diego, CA 92101 619.235.6471 Tel 619.234.0349 Fax P'\3212\SURVEY _l<NDRY\SURVE:Y~DIJ(l\32l2 Mriex pl(l.'tOl.dWQ l/30/200(. 3''5<j'3~ PM PST LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PO/mON OF mE UNlNCOI?I'ORJ. TfJ) AREA OF mE COONTY OF RIVERSIDE, lYING IN PrYInONS OF SE:cnON 27 ANO 2a TO'MISHiP 5 SOOn!, RANGE 4 IlfS( SAN BERNAOINO BASE: ANI! MERlO/AN. TOTAL AREA . 62.42 ACRES. 1oI(Y1[ OR LESS LAFCO 2006-_ _ LEGEND . DORCHfSTfRLANE .LL.LL-L.L./.../L.. [XfSnNC CITY LIMITS P.O.8. INOiCATfS PeNNT OF BEGINNING - - - INO/CATES SHEET LIMITS INDICATfS ANN[XAllON BOUNDARY -- ----------1 r--------i "u.J ~~. [~ SEE SHEET 3- i sctNTC O?E r f sa:N1C CR ST 1lBfrL l INDEX MAP S E SHEET 2 PREPARED BY ME OR UNDO? MY DIRECT SUPERVISION FROU RECORD INFORMATJON ONL Y. NO FInD SlIRV['Y HAS BE[N CONDuCrrO TO 'rf:R1FY ANY RECORD fNFORUAnON. NO SCAI. E 8. SCOTT mKJNS P.L.S. 7696 RfGl5TRAnON rXPIRfS 12/31/06 SHEET I OF J c.)(i-U BIT \ , q ~/~ J ...." AGENDA ITEM NO. t PAGE 3q, ~ - ..--- ~ N I ANNEXATION NO. 19 ~ G~9'41'57"E 658.42' _~~O_~C~ E~Tf!i :}-~~4--rr'- - ~~ = ---~-=-~..:...----=-=- ~- ~~--= i--- '" ~ APN J49-240-4~ <0 49, 59-62 ;;' ^PN ",-""-,, ^PN ",,2<0-" Q:: . KENNETH AND Q ~ BRENDA CRONCE c:i '- ~~ :5::58 g.!, () ~~ Cl 2d, L5 ~;:>; ~ \ ~ i I fPN-;~;~ ~'" ~:~:, ~ PM 8478 '" APN J49-240-45-47 RICK AND LO.!?/ KUFFNfR DOC. NO. 404529. RECOROED 11/20/91 APN J49-240-5~ 5J POR. PARCEL PM 8478 .'" DOC. NO. ... 2004-0998790, ;;; .!?ECORDEO 12/16/04 ::: ~ LITTLE VALLEY ROAD P.O.B. '-' PARCEl. 2 t PM lJJ12 ~ APN J49-240-58 -- N89'36'25"E SCENIC CREST DRIVE 1329.58" / ...._~.~- ~:Ni':;[XA TlON ~o: 27 --=-.:~ ""89~30'48"E ..'~ r,'P"'l1oIT :.... I'~ ~ ~""jl... ~... .~.. .~" li 111-' ...._:..3 ~~ \... 'I ..., '1St ( ~ p~ 21 .3 d . Cl '[ .... :3 -- -..J Gj Q:: ~ J '~..-J "=,--: I I PARCEL 2 PM 8478 APN J49-240-4J, 44, 54-56 POR. PARCEL J PM 8478 GRAPHIC SCALE 'f '~~oo ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 200 It. 2658.94' --1'-- SHEfT 2 OF J AGENDA ITEM NO. b PAGE 40 ~OF 1'1 --_._._._._-----_._--_.~~---------_..-._-----------_.---.-..---------------.----------------..----.-------.--._---------_._-_._---_._._--_._~-------_._----------_.-_._---- PARCEL I PM 8453 l~-- ~1l~ I II , I II ~ I' ~ J l. r __-+ I-.J r~'~ ~ ~ POR. PARCEL 3 PM 8478 APN 349-240-44 I Lp_~ ______,~~_~;~L} -+ N89'30'48"[ ~~ GRAPHIC SCALE ANN[XA nON NO. 52 APN 349-240-48. 49. 59-62 P ARCCL 2 PM 8478 ~ C2 c:::, LITTLE VALLEY ROAD PM 14066 APN 349-380..24 J. L A N89'4j;;5'''E'~ 85223' LOT C /1' -'1/ E5 -,0; , ~ ~ ilil- POR. OF GREENWALD A V[ LABELU) l ":"0:/ N8J'1.:!,~I. 1011.- __ _........._._...._m___________ N89'36'25"[ 2022.49' APN 349-240-43 ~ PARCEL 1 ~ '" PM 17808 G APN 349-380-24 PARCEL 1 PM 7982 APN 349-240-54-56 . ..':.~!.E.~-::\. APN 349-380- 25 PARCEL 1 PM 8070 2~1~ ~. J 2~._~r J. 3 "----._._~ .\ '\ ) ..-- ----- ,1'- ANNE:XA nON NO. 52 ( IN FEET ) 1 Inch = 200 fl. SHEET J OF J PI,\3212,\SURV()'_BNDRY\SURV('I"-Tl\Ju,\3ele /\""el< pl",tOl.cjflS 1/30/200(, 3'~'JlJ5 PM PST \ 6 I EXt-ll BIT . l 12 Pa.~ 3~ :3 ACENOA ,reM NO. b PACE ~\ OF bl RESOLUTION NO. 2006- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 33725, A SUBDIVISION OF 221 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND FIVE (5) WATER QUALITY BASINS, AND TWENTY-FIVE (25) OPEN SPACE LOTS, ON APPROXIMATELY 52.7+ ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF LITTLE VALLEY ROAD, WEST OF GREENWALD AVENUE, EAST OF GRASSY MEADOW DRIVE, AND NORTH AND SOUTH OF SCENIC CREST DRIVE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 349-240-006, -043 THRU -047, AND -054 THRU -056. WHEREAS, the Shopoff Group has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore to subdivide approximately 52.7+ acres of unimproved property into 221 residential lots, five (5) water quality basins and twenty- five (25) open space lots; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the subdivision of land; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 5, 2006. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 33725 prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the proposal to subdivide approximately 52.7 AGENDA ITEM NO. {; PACE L(~ vF b 1 -... PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE20F4 + acres into 221 residential lots, five (5) water quality basins, and twenty- five (25) open space lots. SECTION 2. That in accordance with the California Subdivision Map Act (Cal. Gov. Code SS 66000 et seq.) and the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 33725: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FINDINGS: 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvements, is consistent with the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). a. The design of the proposed subdivision and density of 4.19 dwelling units per acre are consistent with the proposed Ramsgate Specific Plan Fifth Revision ("Fifth Revision "), and therefore with the General Plan because the Ramsgate Specific Plan has been found to be consistent with the General Plan. The Fifth Revision provides a balanced mix of housing types and densities within the Plan. b. The project proposes single family residential lots ranging in size from 5,000 square feet to 16,312 square feet, with an average lot size of 6, 170 square feet, which is consistent with the proposed Ramsgate SP. 2. The site of the proposed division of land is physically suitable for the proposed density of development in accordance with the General Plan. a. The project density and design is compatible with approved Tentative Tract Map No. 25475 Revision No. 1 in the Ramsgate SP to the southwest, and with Tentative Tract Map No. 31370 in the North Tuscany Hills Specific Plan to the southeast. b. The map provides open space areas that protect the natural topography and views. AGENDA ITEM NO. -.b PAGElic~ OF J:J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE30F4 3. The effects that this project are likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources have been considered and balanced. a. The project is consistent with proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2006-05 (GP A). During the approval of the GP A, housing needs, public services and fiscal resources are scrutinized to achieve a balance within the City. b. The map has been conditioned to annex into Community Facilities District 2003-01 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City. c. The map has been conditioned to annex into Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public right-ol-way landscaped areas to be maintained by the City, and for street lights in the public right-ol-way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison. d. The map has been conditioned to form a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of new parks, parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed within the development, andfederal NPDES permit. 4. The design of the proposed division of land or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. a. Tentative Tract Map No. 33725 is conditioned to comply with all development standards of the Ramsgate Specific Plan Fifth Revision. These standards have been prepared and reviewed to benefit the public health, safety and welfare. 5. The design of the proposed division of land or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed division of land. AGENDA ITEM NO. b p AGE4-~ OF I1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006- PAGE40F4 a. All known easements or requests for access have been incorporated into the design of Tentative Tract Map No. 33725. b. The map has been circulated to City departments and outside agencies, and appropriate conditions of approval have been applied to the project. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this fifth day of September, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM NO. b PAGE ~ OF --.h "l. CONDITIONS OF AFFROV AL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAF NO. 33725 A subdivision of .52.7+ acres into 221 residential lots, 5 water basins and 25 open space lots, on AFNs 349-240-006; 349-240-043 thm -047; 349-240-054 thm -056: 349-380-024 and -025. PLANNING DIVISION 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 33725 will expire with the expiration of the applicable Development Agreement for Ramsgate and its accompanying Operating Memorandum(s) of Understanding, unless within that period of time a final map has been filed with the County Recorder, or an extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council. 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 33725 shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 16 unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 3. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, employees, and/or agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its officials, officers, employees, or agents concerning the project attached hereto. 4. The City intends to file a Notice of Determination with the Riverside County Clerk's office within five (5) business days from the approval of this map by the City Council. The applicant shall forward to the Planning Department secretary, a check made payable to the Riverside County Clerk, in the amount of $64.00 to pay for the cost of such filing. This check shall be received by the secretary no more than 48 hours from the approval by the Council. 5. The applicant shall provide to the Community Development Director within 30 days of approval, a final approved version of the project in digitized format. 6. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) adopted for this project, as printed with Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-04 for Ramsgate Specific Plan No. 89-1 Fifth Revision, unless superceded by these Conditions. ACENOA'TiM NO. PAGE G b b OF "1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 33725 A subdivision of .52.7+ acres into 221 residential lots, 5 water basins and 25 open space lots. on APNs 349-240-006: 349-240-043 thru -047: 349-240-054 thru -056; 349-380-024 and -025. 7. The applicant shall fund the implementation of the MMRP through every stage of development. The City shall appoint an environmental monitor who shall periodically inspect the project site, documents submitted by the applicant, permits issued, and any other pertinent material, in order to monitor and report compliance to the City until the completion of the project. 8. This map must comply with the Development Standards and Design Guidelines approved with the Ramsgate Specific Plan No. 89-1 Fifth Revision (SP). Construction of the property is subject to all the Conditions of Approval of the SP unless superceded by these conditions. a. All lots shall comply with the minimum standards contained in the residential Development Regulations contained in the SP, including lot frontage minimums and comer lot requirements. b. Where the SP is silent, Title 16 and 17 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code shall apply. 9. The applicant shall sign and return an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" to the Community Development Department within 30 days of the tentative map approval by the City Council. PRIOR TO FINAL TRACT MAP: 10. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department as specified in the Department transmittal dated March 8, 2006, attached. 11. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots shall be provided per the LEMC. 12. The applicant's engineer shall coordinate the design of Scenic Crest Drive with development of Tentative Tract Map No. 31370 at the direction of the City Engineer. ACENOA ITEM NO. r; PACE_ ~ 1 _OF b\ CONDITIONS OF AFFROV AL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAF NO. 33725 A subdivision of .52.7+ acres into 221 residential lots, 5 water basins and 25 open space lots, on AFNs 349-240-006; 349-240-043 thru -047; 349-240-054 thru -056; 349-380-024 and -025. 13. The applicant shall identify and design a trail access from Scenic Crest Drive to the Open Space Wildlife Corridor, that includes dimensions, type of materials used, and conceptual interpretive signage to be installed. 14. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved by the Community Development Director or designee prior to final map approval. 15. All of the improvements shall be designed by the developer's Civil Engineer to the specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore. 16. The applicant shall initiate and complete the formation of a homeowners' association approved by the City, recorded and in place. All Association documents shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded, such as the Articles of Incorporation and Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs). The HOA shall be responsible for the maintenance of all open space areas and maintenance easement areas. The HOA shall maintain or coordinate with an appropriate agency approved by the Community Development Director, for such maintenance. a. In the event that the Homeowners' Association fails to meet its responsibilities with regards to the maintenance of open space areas, the Lighting, Landscaping and Maintenance District shall automatically provide such maintenance and assess the HOA for such servIce. b. CC&Rs shall prohibit on-street storage of boats, motor homes, trailers, and trucks over one-ton capacity. c. CC&Rs shall prohibit roof-mounted or front-yard microwave satellite antennas. d. The developer shall provide landscaped areas on both sides of any access roadways within the tract, and the landscaped areas shall be maintained by the HOA. ACENDA ITEM NO. PACE ~ 1.. 6 OF fol CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 33725 A subdivision of .52.7+ acres into 221 residential lots, 5 water basins and 25 open space lots. on APNs 349-240-006; 349-240-043 thm -047; 349-240-054 thm -056; 349-380-024 and -025. 23. The Ramsgate SP project area is not within a Redevelopment Agency designated area. 24. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Lake Elsinore Unified School District under the provisions of SB 50, wherein the owner or developer shall pay school fees or enter into a mitigation agreement prior to the issuance of a certificate of compliance by the District. 25. The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer for each lot within the subdivision. No service laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and shall be delineated on engineering sewer plans and profiles for submittal to the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). 26. All storm drains are to be maintained in accordance with the cooperative agreement with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. a. The homeowners' association shall maintain water quality basins, landscaping, and open space drainage. 27. The developer shall submit plans to the electric utility company to layout the street lighting system. The cost of street lighting, installation, and energy charges shall be the responsibility of the developer and/or the Association until streets are accepted by the City. Said plans shall be approved by the City and installed in accordance with City Standards. 28. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing electric utility company. 29. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing gas utility company. 30. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing telephone utility company. '1'~'''''' uo b f~Ct:N~~~E~~; '-_OF _ b 1 - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 33725 A subdivision of .52.7+ acres into 221 residential lots, 5 water basins and 25 open space lots. on APNs 349-240-006: 349-240-043 thru -047: 349-240-054 thru -056: 349-380-024 and -025. 31. A bond is required guaranteeing the removal of all trailers used during construction. 32. All signage shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to installation. 33. Landscape Plans for the tract shall include vegetative screening of retention basins and both sides of service roads and drainage easements. 34. Any alterations to the topography, ground surface, or any other site preparation activity will require appropriate grading permits. A Geologic Soils Report with associated recommendations will be required for grading permit approval, and all grading must meet the City's Grading Ordinance, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and the Planning Division. Analysis of impacts of fills and cuts greater than sixty feet (60') shall be provided. Interim and permanent erosion control measures are required. The applicant shall bond 100% for material and labor for one (1) year for erosion control landscaping at the time the site is rough graded. PRIOR TO DESIGN REVIEW: 35. All future structural development associated with this map requires separate Design Review approval. 36. Elevation drawings for Design Review shall include four-sided architectural features for both the first and second story. The applicant may submit to the Community Development Director or his designee, for review and approval, evidence that a particular elevation is hidden from public view and not visible due to elevation changes. In those instances, to be determined by the Community Development Director or his designee on a case-by-case basis, this condition may be waived. 37. Slopes on individual lots that are in excess of three feet in height shall be installed, landscaped and irrigated by the developer prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. "GENOA fiEM .'lO'~ P,\CrE_SO_Of_ - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 33725 A subdivision of .52.7+ acres into 221 residential lots, 5 water basins and 25 open space lots, on APNs 349-240-006: 349-240-043 thru -047; 349-240-054 thru -056: 349-380-024 and -025. 38. Downslopes adjacent to streets shall be maintained by the HOA. 39. A detailed fencing plan shall be required for review and approval during the Design Review process. a. The applicant shall install walls and fencing along the perimeter of the subdivision in accordance with the approved Design Guidelines for the Ramsgate Specific Plan. b. Where views to open space are important, the applicant shall provide the appropriate view fencing. 40. A detailed phasing plan shall be required for review and approval during the Design Review process. a. Construction phasing plans shall include the location of construction fencing for each phase. b. Construction phasing plans shall indicate primary and secondary access and the location of all utilities for each phase. c. Construction phasing plans shall be designed to avoid construction traffic from entering occupied neighborhoods to the greatest extent possible. For safety purposes construction phasing plans shall also be designed such that new residents can avoid traveling through construction areas. 41. Primary and secondary access roads for each phase as identified on the map "Fire Access Table" shall be fully constructed and open to the public prior to the issuance of the Certificates of Occupancy for each phase of the tract. ENGINEERING DIVISION General Requirements: 1. Annexation process shall be completed in order for the City to have regulatory ACENDA'TEM NO. PAGE S \ b OF t 1. _ ...... - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 33725 A subdivision of .52.7+ acres into 221 residential lots. 5 water basins and 25 open space lots, on APNs 349-240-006; 349-240-043 thru -047: 349-240-054 thru -056; 349-380-024 and -025. jurisdiction of this project. 2. A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. 3. Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant to provide to the City with a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. Such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 4. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. All manufactured slopes greater than 30 ft. in height shall be contoured. 5. This project shall comply with the recommendations of the traffic study prepared by Urban Crossroads dated October 24,2005. 6. Provide Tract Phasing Plan for the City Engineer's approval. Bond public improvements for each Phase as approved by the City Engineer. 7. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work on City right-of- way. 8. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. Overhead utilities shall be undergrounded. 9. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. b AGENDA tTEM NO._ ~ \ -= PAGE_ 5.~ ~QF_ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 33725 A subdivision of .52.7+ acres into 221 residential lots. 5 water basins and 25 open space lots, on APNs 349-240-006: 349-240-043 thm -047; 349-240-054 thm -056; 349-380-024 and -025. 10.Applicant shall obtain any necessary County permits and meet all County requirements for any work within County right-of-way. 11. The applicant shall install permanent bench marks per Riverside County Standards and at locations to be determined by City Engineer. 12.Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. The fuel modification zone shall be maintained by a homeowner's association or other private entity approved by the City. 13.Applicant shall pay all applicable development fees, including but not all inclusive: TUMF, MSHCP,TIF and area drainage fees. 14.10 year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria are exceeded, drainage facilities shall be provided. 15.All drainage facilities in this tract shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 16.All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 'i'2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 1 7. Up-slope maintenance along right-of-ways shall be maintained by a homeowner's association or other private entity approved by the City. 18.All open space and slopes except for public parks and schools and flood control district facilities, outside the public right-of-way shall be owned and maintained by homeowner's association or other private entity approved by the City. 19.All waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or other phases of the construction shall be disposed of at appropriate recycling centers. The applicant should ACENDA ITEM NO. r: PAGE S~ ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 33725 A subdivision of .52.7+ acres into 221 residential lots, 5 water basins and 25 open space lots. on APNs 349-240-006; 349-240-043 thm -047; 349-240-054 thm -056; 349-380-024 and -025. contract with CR&R Inc. for recycling and storage container services, but the applicant may use the services of another recycling vendor. Another recycling vendor, other than CR&R Inc., cannot charge the applicant for bin rental or solid waste disposal. If the applicant is not using CR&R Inc. for recycling services and the recycling material is either sold or donated to another vendor, the applicant shall supply proof of debris disposal at a recycling center, including verification of tonnage by certified weigh master tickets. 20.Some of the improvements shown on the Map and/or required by these conditions are located in the County of Riverside and/or private property. The developer shall be responsible for obtaining County and/or private permits and approvals needed to complete the required offsite improvements. 21.0n-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage easement. 22.All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 23 .Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs should drain to a landscaped area. 24.Applicant shall comply with all NPDES requirements in effect; including the submittal of an Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as required per the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. The requirements of WQMP may affect the overall layout of the project. Therefore, WQMP submittal should be during the initial process of the project. 25.Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. (Required for lot of one acre or more) ACENOA 'TE~ N. O. A PA{iE~L~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 33725 A subdivision of .52.7+ acres into 221 residential lots. 5 water basins and 25 open space lots, on APNs 349-240-006: 349-240-043 thru -047; 349-240-054 thru -056: 349-380-024 and -025. 26.City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law. Prior to Approval of final Map, unless other timing is indicated, the subdivider shall complete the following or have plans submitted and approved, agreements executed and securities posted: 27.Construct Little Valley Road per County Standard 104A (60'/40'). The horizontal curvature shall be designed at a minimum speed of 35mph. A temporary ac paved turnaround shall be provided at the terminus of Little Valley Road. 28.Construct Scenic Valley Road per County Standard 104A (60'/40') or as shown in the map. 29.Improve the west side of Greenwald Avenue by constructing an additional paved width of 20' per County Standard 102. Adequate transitions shall be provided. Note: Should the existing structural section is found to be substandard for a secondary road, the road improvements shall extend to the centerline of Greenwald Avenue. 30.Construct local streets "A" to "N" per County Standard 106A (60/40) or as shown in the map. 31. The construction of "A" street also functioning as secondary access road for Tract 25475 shall be approved by the Fire Department. ACENDA rrE=U ".'.".' ~ ftA".. ~ l nwc ,--,'- _OF 1_ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 33725 A subdivision of .52.7+ acres into 221 residential lots, 5 water basins and 25 open space lots. on APNs 349-240-006; 349-240-043 thm -047; 349-240-054 thm -056; 349-380-024 and -025. 32.Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds prior to final map approval. 33.Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. 34.Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 35.Make an offer of dedication for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or shown on the Tentative Map. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the city. 36. Applicant shall submit signing and striping plans for the required street improvements and a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the tract to be approved prior to final map approval. All signing and striping and traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. This includes Street Name Signs, No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract. 37.A Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare street and traffic improvement plans and specifications. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). Street improvement plans shall show existing and future profiles at centerline of street, at top of curb and at centerline of the alley. The profiles and contours will extend to 50' beyond the property limits. 38.All Public Works improvements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to final map approval. The improvements shall include street and drainage improvements, street lighting, and associated traffic improvements related to the project. AGENDA ITEM NO. . PAGE S~ b OF b'1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 33725 A subdivision of .52.7+ acres into 221 residential lots, 5 water basins and 25 open space lots, on APNs 349-240-006: 349-240-043 thm -047; 349-240-054 thm -056; 349-380-024 and -025. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 39.Submit grading plans with appropriate security, Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer for approval by the City Engineer. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or diversion of drainage. 40.Construction Project access and hauling route shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer, 41.Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 42.An Alquist-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on-site unless a registered geologist provides verification that the project is exempt. 43.The applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements and/or permits for off-site grading and/or drainage acceptance from the adjacent property owners prior to grading permit issuance. 44.Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 45.Applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a Notice of Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program with a storm water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction, which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development including maintenance responsibilities. The applicant shall submit the SWPPP to the City for review and approval. ACENDA 1Tf:'M fijO. PAce51 . OF 6 61 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 33725 A subdivision of .52.7+ acres into 221 residential lots. 5 water basins and 25 open space lots, on APNs 349-240-006; 349-240-043 thru -047; 349-240-054 thru -{}56; 349-380-024 and -{}25. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 46.All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to building permit. 47.Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location. such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. 48.Pay all Capital Improvement TIF and Master Drainage Fees and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34). 49.Provide a traffic signal warrant analysis for the intersection of Greenwald and Scenic Crest Drive. If warranted, the developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Greenwald and Scenic Crest Drive. Prior to Occupancy 50.Pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of off-site public works improvements (LEMC12.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy. 51.All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 52.All public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6 ACENDA ITE), tJO. -. 6J ~ PAGE.J6 __OF __.~- CONDITIONS OF AFFROV AL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAF NO. 33725 A subdivision of .52.7+ acres into 221 residential lots, 5 water basins and 25 open space lots, on AFNs 349-240-006; 349-240-043 thru -047: 349-240-054 thru -056: 349-380-024 and -025. 53.Water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with Water District requirements. 54. The project applicant shall participate in the phased construction of the off-site intersection improvements as listed in their traffic study through payment of TIF and TUMF fees, payment of the project's fair share contribution towards other off-site improvements not included in the active fee programs, or construction of off-site facilities under appropriate fee credit agreements. 55.If warranted, the traffic signal at Greenwald and Scenic Crest Drive shall be operational. 56. TUMF fees shall be paid. The TUMF fees shall be the effective rate at the time when the Certificate of Occupancy is obtained. DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1. Annex into CFD 2003-1: Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, or Special Use Permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex into Community Facilities District 2003-1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City. 2. Annex into LLMD No.1: Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, or Special Use Permit (as applicable) the applicant shall annex into Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public right- of-way landscaped areas to be maintained by the City, and for street lights in the public right-of-way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison. 3. Fire Station Impact Fee and Other Impact Fees: Upon completion of the Fire Station Impact Study and other impact fee studies, developer shall pay impact fee. ACENDA liEM NO. 6 PACE21~OF 61. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 33725 A subdivision of .52.7+ acres into 221 residential lots, 5 water basins and 25 open space lots, on APNs 349-240-006: 349-240-043 thm -047; 349-240-054 thm -056; 349-380-024 and -025. 4. CFD for Park. Parkway. Open Space and Storm Drain Maintenance: Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, or Special Use Permit (as applicable), the applicant shall form a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of the new parks, parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 1. The developer shall pay park fees of $1 ,600 per unit ($211,200). 2. The developer is required to participate in the "Public Facility" fee program. 3. The developer shall comply with all NPDES storm water requirements. 4. All interior landscape, recreation areas, facilities and/or open space shall be maintained by the HOA. No park credits shall be given. 5. The HOA shall maintain all all park and common landscape areas. 6. The HOA shall maintain all natural and manufactured slopes. 7. The HOA shall maintain all drainage facilities and structures. 8. The HOA shall maintain all catch basins, collectors, v-ditches or any other related flood control or storm water control device. 9. The HOA to maintain all exterior walls and landscaping. 10. The developer shall participate in the City-wide LLMD. 11. The developer shall annex into LLMD District 1 for all exterior landscaping to be maintained by the City. ACENDA ITEM NO. .b PAGE_6LoF 61 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 33725 A subdivision of .52.7+ acres into 221 residential lots. 5 water basins and 25 open space lots, on APNs 349-240-006: 349-240-043 thm -047; 349-240-054 thm -056: 349-380-024 and -025. 12. The developer shall comply with all City ordinances regarding construction debris removal and recycling, per Section 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 13. The developer shall provide the City with an inventory of all street signs, street markings, street trees and total square footage of all streets in a digital format acceptable to the City. 14. Secondary access shall be clearly defined as part of the development. 15. The developer shall meet City curb, gutter and sidewalk requirements. 16. The City's Landscape Architect shall review all landscape and/or irrigation plans prior to acceptance by the City. (Riverside County Fire Department Conditions of Approval dated March 8, 2006 attached. ) (End of Conditions) ACENOA ITEM NO. PAGE 6-\. OF 6 61. MAR-15-2006 WED 09:50 AM RIV CO FIRE P&E FAX NO, 951 955 4886 (C"/It. :/ :J ?ZS- 03/08/06 05:54 Riverside County LMS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Library Conditions 10. GENERAL CONDITIONS FIRE DEPARTMENT 10.FlRE.999 CASE - CITY CASE STATEMENT With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced project, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standarqs: lO.FIRE.999 MAp-#SO-BLUE DOT RE~LECTORS Blue retroreflective pavement markers shall be mounted on private streets, public streets and driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. prior to installation, placement of markers must be approved by the Riverside County Fire Department. lO.FlRE.999 MAP*-#16-HYDR4NT/SPACING Schedule A fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6"x4":X2 1/2"> located one at each street intersection and spaced no more than jJ() feet apart in any dj~tion, with no portion of any lot frontage more than feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be IDOO GPM for 2 hour duration at 20 PSI. Shall include perimeter streets at each intersection and spaced 660 feet apart. . 50. PRIOR TO MAP RECORDATION FIRE DElPARTMENT SO.FIRE.999 MAP-#7-ECS-HAZ FIRE AREA Ecs map must be stamped Py the Riverside County Surveyor with the following note: The land division is located in the .'Hazardous Fire Area" of Riverside County as shown on a map on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Any building constructed on lots created by this land division shall comply with the special construction provisions contained in Riverside County Ordinance 787. ACENDA ITEM NO. PAGE b ~~ OF ----- p, 04 Page: 1 DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT 6 ~T MAR-15-2006 WED 09:50 AM RIV CO FIRE P&E FAX NO. 951 855 4886 P. 05 03/08/06 05:54 Riverside County LMS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page: 2 Library Conditions 50. PRIOR TO MAP RECORDATION 50. FIRE:' 999 MAP*-#43-ECS-ROOFING MATERIAL DRAFT Ecs map must be stamped by the Riverside County Surveyor with the fallowing note: All buildings shall be constructed with class I~J( material as per the California Building Code. 50.FIRE.999 MAP-#46-WATER PLANS DRAFT The applicant or developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineerf containing a Fire Department approval signature block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow. Once plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department far signature. SO.FIRE.999 MAP-#53-ECS-WTR PRXOR/COMBUS DRAFT Ecs map must be stamped by the Riverside County Surveyor with the following note: The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material placed on an individual lot. SO.PIREl.999 MAP-#47-SECONDARY ACCESS DRAFT In the interest of Public Safety, the project shall provide an Alternate or Secondary Access(s) as stated in the Transportation Deparment Conditions. Said Alternate or Secondary Access(s) shall have concurrence and approval of bath the Transportation Department and the Riverside County Fire Department. 80. PRIOR TO BLDG PRMT ISSUANCE FIRE DEPARTMENT aO.FIRE.999 MAP-#50C-TRACT WATER VERIFICA DRAFT The required water system, including all fire hydrant(s), shall be installed and accepteq by the appropriate water agency and the Riverside County Fire Department prior to any combustible building material placed an an individual lot. Contact the Riverside County Fire Department to inspect the required fire flow, street signs, all weather surface, and all access and/or secondary. Approved water ACEN0A1TFMNO. h . PACE b3 ~ MAR-15-2006 WED 09:50 AM RIV CO FIRE P&E 03/08/06 05:54 FAX NO. 951 955 4886 Riverside County LMS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Library Conditions 80. PRIOR TO BLDG PRMT ISSUANCE aO.FIRE.999 MAP-#50C-TRACT WATER VERIFICA (cont.) plans must be a the job site. 80.FIRE.999 MAP - SECONDARY/ALTER ACCESS In the interest of Public Safety, the project shall provide An Alternate or Seconqary Access(s) as stated in the Transportation Department conditions. Said Alternate or Secondary Access(s) shall have concurrence and approval of both the Transportation Department and the Riverside County Fire Department. Alternate and/or Secondary Access(s) shall be completed and inspected per the approved plans. AOENDA ITEM NO. PAGE b~ p, 06 Page: 3 DRAFT DRAFT ~ OF bl r ......... t ~:I!I ,jl .... g ~ ~;I~ (,) 1'1 . , t ~-d ~ ;:111 i, I~ I .-; ol!~ il 'i }! ~II) &I. ,', { I ~ ~~ : j:::~ Olh t . I&. I~ i~z~ I~~~ ffi ~I! ~~. ~~. ~ I ~ ~'H ~~I ~ ~iI il~ ~~!i z. ~~I~ ~ ~~~h I ..! i~h ~i ~ ii!6l@ I ~ i~ ! W~;b I ; ; i i~ I i ~;d~~I~ I~;'! ~ I~Nnt I ~ 'j ~I ~ ~ 'hll ~ ~ 1"'lIs G I~!II~ ~~~~ ~~h. i il; I U ~~!il dW~~:I.~~~ Uhli ~ ~I~~ I~h~~ ~.I~~!l"lllw~ I i~jJJL III dll!li ~; :llm~: ~ ~Lt:~i:!~!~H;~~ -=:~.~ w- m . . . . . . !Ii ~~:;~;; i~ :~ i . " ~ lQ ~I ). i I I: is I I · 2: ~~ , ~ m' ~ I ~ I ~ ~d; g 5 I u I~ ~ ~ I a n I I ~ u -! nil i!:li.h i !iI i . -. d. !!i II I! ~9C::: H iZl . 1 il i~ < ~ ~ .1 I, ~ ~ - I .-1 ;' ',' ~L, : II'" , CI) ~ .F.~ ; ~ I I- o ... Notice of Determination Mitigated Negative Declaration (In compliance with Section 2 I I 08 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code) City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (909) 674-3124 (909)471-1419 fax Filed With: D Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 [8] County Clerk of Riverside County 2724 Gateway Drive Riverside, CA 92507 Project Tide: Litde Valley Annexation No. 76, General Plan Amendment No. 2006-05, Pre-Annexation Zone Change No. 2006-05, Zone Change No. 2006-07, Ramsgate Specific Plan 89-1 Fifth Revision, and Tentative Tract Map No. 33725 State Clearinghouse Number (if submitted to State Clearinghouse): N/A Lead Agency Contact Person: Carole Donahoe, Project Planner Telephone Number: (951) 674-3124 x 287 Project Location (include County): The site of Annexation No. 76 et.al. is located in Riverside County, adjacent to the northeast boundary of the City of Lake Elsinore. The site is south of Litde Valley Road, north of Scenic Crest Drive, west of Greenwald, and east of Grassy Meadow Drive. The Ramsgate Specific Plan is located approximately one mile east of Interstate 15, south of Highway 74, and west of Greenwald Avenue. Project Description: Commencement of proceedings to bring 62.42 acres of land into the City boundaries that are currendy in the County of Riverside's jurisdiction and in the City's Sphere of Influence area, and to amend the City's General Plan Land Use Map and pre-zone the property Ramsgate Specific Plan and R-E Estate Single Family Residential, Yz acre minimum lot size. Revise the Ramsgate Specific Plan to include 52.7 acres of vacant land for residential development as new Planning Area 10. Subdivide 52.7 acres into 221 single family residential lots, 5 water quality basins, and 25 open space lots. This is to advise that the Lake Elsinore City Council (Lead Agency) has approved the above project and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project D will [8J will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was not prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. ~ A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. The Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Program and record of project approval may be examined at: City of lake Elsinore. 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore. CA 92530 3. Mitigation Measures [8J were D were not made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A Statement of Overriding Considerations D was [8J was not adopted for this project. Signed: Tide: Director of Community Development Rolfe M. Preisendanz AGENDA ITEM NO._., 61- PAGE 66 OF b - ---~ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding Project Title/Location (include County): Annexation No. 76, General Plan Amendment No. 2006-05, Pre-Annexation Zone Change No. 2006-05, Zone Change No. 2006-07, Ramsgate Specific Plan 89-1 Fifth Revision, and Tentative Tract Map No. 33725. Project Location: In the County of Riverside, adjacent to the northeast boundary of the City of Lake Elsinore. The site is south of Little Valley Road, north of Scenic Crest Drive, west of Greenwald, and east of Grassy Meadow Drive, and known as APN 349-240-043 thru -047; 349-240-050 and -051; 349-240-054 thru -058; 340-380-024 and -025. Project Description: Commencement of proceedings to bring 62.42 acres ofland into the City boundaries that are currently in the County of Riverside's jurisdiction and the City's Sphere ofInfluence, and to amend the General Plan Land Use Map and pre-zone the property Ramsgate Specific Plan and R-E Estate Single Family Residential, Yz acre minimum lot size. Revise the Ramsgate Specific Plan to include 52.7 acres of vacant land for residential development as new Planning Area 10. Subdivide 52.7 acres into 221 single family residential lots, 5 water quality basins, and 25 open space lots. Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): Potential significant impacts to wildlife resources have been analyzed, discussed and mitigated in Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-04. The City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore finds and determines that this project will not substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, nor will it cause a population to drop below self-sustaining levels. The project will not eliminate a plant or animal community, nor reduce the number or range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. Certification: I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above findings and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Rolfe M. Preisendanz Title: Director of Community Development Lead Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Date: September 26, 2006 ACENDA'TEM NO.., h PAGE bl O~ - ,-