HomeMy WebLinkAbout10.03.2006 PC AGENDA
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
MICHAEL O'NEAL, CHAIRMAN
JOHN GONZALES, VICE CHAIRMAN
JIMMY FLORES, COMMISSIONER
AXEL ZANELLI, COMMISSIONER
PHIL MENDOZA, COMMISSIONER
ROLFE PREISENDANZ, DIR. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
WWW.LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG
(951) 674-3124 PHONE
(951) 674-2392 FAX
LAKE ELSINORE CULTURAL CENTER
183 NORTH MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530
*******************************************************************
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 3, 2006
6:00 P.M.
If you are attending this Planning Commission Meeting please park in the Parking
Lot across the street from the Cultural Center. This will assist us in limiting the
impact of meetings on the Downtown Business District. Thank you for your
cooperation!
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON AGENDIZED ITEMS - 3 MINUTES
(Please read & complete a Speaker's Form at the podium, prior to the start of the
Planning Commission Meeting)
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS
(All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved in one motion, unless a
Commissioner or any members of the public requests separate action on a specific
item. )
1. Minutes
a. Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes for August 1, 2006
PAGE 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA- OCTOBER 3,2006
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
(Please read & complete a Speaker's Form at the podium prior to the start of the
Planning Commission Meeting. The Chairman will call on you to speak when your
item is called.)
2. Reclamation Plan No. 2006-01
. Pacific Aggregates, Incorporated (Pacific Aggregates), a wholly owned
subsidiary of Pacific Clay Products Incorporated (Pacific Clay), has submitted
an application for approval of a Reclamation Plan for a 21 lAO-acre mining site.
A total of 125.57 acres out of the 21 lAO-acre site will be directly affected by
the Reclamation activities of mining, grading and reclamation. The site is
divided by Nichols Road and is composed of a series of vacant, rolling to steep
hills.
CASE PLANNER:
Kirt Coury, Planning consultant
Ext. 274, kcoury@lake-elsinore.org
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
3. Commercial Design Review No. 2006-02 and Tentative Condominium Tract
No. 34864 "Office Building Complex"
. The subject property, which consists of a previously graded and improved
vacant pad, is located within the Neighborhood Commercial (C-l/SP) zoning
district of the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan. Since project
submittal, staff has worked successfully with the applicant to achieve additional
decorative elements and materials on the building, an entry courtyard effect
through decorative paving improvements and the incorporation of additional
planting along the building frontage.
CASE PLANNER:
Matt Harris, Senior Planner
Ext. 279, mharris@lake-elsinore.org
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA- OCTOBER 3, 2006
4. Commercial Design Review No.
. The applicant is requesting approval of the design and construction of a Club
House building and associated improvements that will be a part of a future Golf
Course complex known as "The Links at Summerly."
CASE PLANNER:
Linda Miller, Planning Consultant
Ext. 209, lmiller@lake-elsinore.org
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
5. Minor Design Review ofa Residential Duplex located on Kellogg Street (APN
374-044-007)
. The two story duplex building includes two (2) 1,651 square foot residential
units with two (2) 590 square foot attached garages for a total of 3,218 square
feet of building footprint area or thirty-five percent (35%) of the total lot area of
9,148 square feet. This meets the maximum allowable building area of thirty-
five percent (35%) per the requirements of the Historic Elsinore Standards. Each
two story unit includes a great room, kitchen, laundry area, three (3) bedrooms,
and two (2) bathrooms. Each garage includes an eighty square foot storage area.
CASE PLANNER:
Linda Miller, Planning Consultant
Ext. 209, lmiller@lake-elsinore.org
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
6. Industrial Design Review No. I 2006-01
. The applicant is proposing to develop a "tilt-up" industrial building available for
lease on a 1.01 acre parcel. The proposed building will be comprised of two (2)
loading docks, a 16,580 square-foot warehouse with two (2) grade level loading
doors, and 1,995 square-feet of two-story office space. It should be noted that
although the office space will comprise two (2) stories, the developer is only
proposing to build the first-floor under this entitlement. The second story office
will be built as a tenant improvement at a later date.
PAGE 4 - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA- OCTOBER 3,2006
CASE PLANNER:
Justin Carlson, Associate Planner
Ext. 295, jcarlson@lake-elsinore.org
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
BUSINESS ITEMS
7. Public Convenience and Necessity (PCN) Notification to State Department of
Alcoholic Beverage Control for the Target Store Location at 18287 Collier
Avenue (Oak Grove Shopping Center)
CASE PLANNER:
Tom Weiner, Planning Manager
Ext. 270, tweiner@lake-elsinore.org
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
INFORMATIONAL
STAFF COMMENTS
PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION
FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: OCTOBER 3, 2006
PREPARED BY: KIRT A. COURY, PLANNING CONSULTANT
PROJECT TITLE: RECLAMATION PLAN NO. 2006-01
APPLICANT:
HARDY STROZIER, THE PLANNING ASSOCIATES
3151 AIRWAY AVENUE, STE. R-l, COSTA MESA
CA, 92626
SCOTT THAYER, PACIFIC AGGREGATES, INC.,
19700 FAIRCHILD, STE. 300, IRVINE, CA 92612
PROJECT REQUEST
OWNER:
The request before the Planning Commission is for review and approval of a
Reclamation Plan for a 2Il.40-acre site known as Nichols Canyon Mine (the
"Project"). The Reclamation Plan outlines how mined lands will be reclaimed,
rehabilitated, and revegetated. The Reclamation Plan has been reviewed pursuant
to state law, Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Chapter 14.04, and Alberhill
Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No.3.
PROJECT LOCATION
The 211.40 acre site which forms the basis for the Reclamation Plan is located in
the northern part of the City of Lake Elsinore, east of the 1-15 freeway at the
Nichols Road intersection, and which is more particularly described in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto (the "Project Site"). The Project Site is divided by Nichols Road
and is composed of a series of vacant, rolling to steep hills, which contain a
significant deposit of shale. Nichols Canyon Mine is accessible from Nichols
Road.
ACENDA 'TEM NO. J...
PACE_ \ OF_ 50
REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
October 3, 2006
PAGE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Undeveloped and vacant areas neighbor the Project Site to the north and northwest.
The 1-15 Freeway borders the south/southwestern perimeter of the Project Site.
Further south of the 1-15 Freeway, along Collier Avenue, is the existing Lake
Elsinore Outlet Center. Single-family residences are located to the north and
northeast. Temescal Canyon High School is located one-quarter (1/4) mile to the
south/southeast of the Project Site.
Project Vacant Alberhill Ranch Specific Alberhill Ranch Specific
Site Plan Plan
North Vacant/ Riverside County Mountainous and Open
Single- Space (Riverside County
Family General Plan)
Residential
South 1-15 Riverside County Public Institutional
Freeway/ (Riverside County General
Outlet Mall Plan)
East Vacant/ Riverside County Mountainous (Riverside
Existing County General Plan)
High
School
West 1-15 Interstate 15 Freeway Interstate 15 Freeway
Freeway
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Pacific Aggregates, Incorporated ("Pacific Aggregates"), a wholly owned
subsidiary of Pacific Clay Products Incorporated ('"Pacific Clay"), requests review
and approval of a Reclamation Plan for the Project Site. The Project Site is owned
by Castle & Cooke Lake Elsinore Outlet Centers, Inc. but the mining and
reclamation activities will be conducted by Pacific Aggregates.
ACENOA ITEM NO. ~
PAGE ~ -OF 50 .
REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
October 3,2006
PAGE 3
A reclamation plan is a document that outlines the combined process of land
treatment that minimizes water degradation, air pollution, damage to aquatic or
wildlife habitat, flooding, erosion and other adverse effects from surface mining
operations. The goal of a reclamation plan is to restore mined lands to a usable
condition which is readily adaptable for alternate land uses compatible with zoning
and the general plan. The reclamation process involves backfilling, grading,
resoiling, revegetation, soil compaction, stabilization, and other measures.
The scope of rehabilitation set forth in the Reclamation Plan is dependent upon the
extent of disturbance that is caused by the surface mining operations. It is for this
reason that the Reclamation Plan contains significant discussion of the mining
operations. Despite the discussion of mining operations in the Reclamation Plan,
the purpose of the Reclamation Plan is to establish the methodology and strategy
for rehabilitating and revitalizing the impacted areas.
Extraction activities at Nichols Canyon Mine are expected to impact 125.57 acres
of the total 211.40-acre site. The sum total of 125.57 mined acres is reached based
on excavation that will result in an approximate flat area of 63.86 acres north of
Nichols Road, an approximate flat area of 34.62 acres south of Nichols Road,
23.15 acres of recreated slope on the northern portion of the Project Site, and 3.94
acres of "Disturbance Area" also located in the northern portion of the Project Site.
The mining activities will be broken down into multiple phases. Once the mining
operations are complete for each individual phase, Pacific Aggregates will begin
reclamation activities for that portion of the Project. Reclamation activities will be
ongoing throughout the life of the Project and are designed to reclaim, rehabilitate
and revegetate the land used by Pacific Aggregates for mining purposes. Natural
westerly on site ridgelines along the 1-15 freeway will be used to limit views of the
mining and processing operations.
Though the Project Site is currently surrounded by undeveloped and vacant areas
to the north and immediate west, residential and commercial developments are
currently being developed one mile to the west of the Reclamation Project Site
pursuant to the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan. Once reclamation of the Project
Site is complete, the area will be compatible with open space and commercial uses
which are contemplated by the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No. 3
adopted in June, 1997.
- NDA ITEM NO.
PAGE ":)
~
OF SO
REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
October 3,2006
PAGE 4
PROJECT BACKGROUND
Pacific Clay owns approximately 3,457 acres of land adjacent to the 1-15 freeway,
some of which lies within the City's boundaries and a portion of which lies within
the County's boundaries. Pacific Clay has operated a major brick production
operation at its Pacific Clay mine since the early 1900s.
In 1975, the California Legislature adopted the Surface Mining and Reclamation
Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code 99 2710 et seq.: "SMARA"). SMARA is designed to
protect the extraction of minerals as an essential element to the continued
economic well-being of the state. In enacting SMARA, the Legislature expressly
intended to create and maintain an effective and comprehensive surface mining and
reclamation policy for the regulation of surface mining operations. To achieve this
end, SMARA requires all surface mining operations obtain a surface mining permit
from the lead agency and have approved by the lead agency a reclamation plan.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, SMARA exempts certain projects from the surface
mining permit requirement. According to SMARA, if a project has a vested
mining right, the project does not need to obtain a surface mining permit and can
continue its mining operation consistent with prior procedures. The project is not
relieved, however, of the requirement to prepare a reclamation plan.
Nichols Canyon Mine is part of Pacific Clay's 3,457 acres of land and represents a
small portion of Pacific Clay's overall mining operation which has been ongoing
since the early 1900s. Pacific Clay has a vested right to mine on the Project Site
and is not required to secure a mining permit. After the passage of SMARA,
Pacific Clay sought and secured permits from the County of Riverside for all
mining operations on its approximately 3,457 acres of land. In addition, Pacific
Clay submitted to the County a reclamation plan covering the approximately 3,457
acres and the reclamation plan was approved as RP-112.
Nevertheless, the Project Site is now within the City's corporate boundaries and is
physically separated from Pacific Clay's larger brick production operation off of
Temescal Canyon Road. The lead agency for the Nichols Canyon Mine is the City
of Lake Elsinore. As such, the attached Reclamation Plan has been submitted for
review and approval by the City.
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~
PACE 4 __OF 50
REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
October 3,2006
PAGE 5
Zoning for the Project Site is governed by the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan. The
uses outlined in the Reclamation Plan are consistent with the provisions of the
Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan and associated amendments, including Specific Plan
Amendment No.3. The Reclamation Plan is designed to reclaim, rehabilitate, and
revegetate the mined land. Mitigation measures have been included in the
Reclamation Plan, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program, and conditions of approval to minimize potentially significant
impacts of the Project on the surrounding community and environment. The
Reclamation Plan satisfies the City's Surface Mining and Reclamation policies set
forth in Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter 14.04.
The Project Site is presently vacant and undeveloped. On-site vegetation was
mostly destroyed in a wild land fire in 2003.
ANAL YSIS
Riverside County is one of the fastest growing regions in the United States. Pacific
Aggregates' available resources of quality shale-based clay material will not meet
the projected future demand of the national, regional and local markets that the
company serves. The Project Site contains areas of significant shale deposits
which can be extracted and used by Pacific Clay in its production of brick
products. Additionally, the extracted material is important for Pacific Aggregates'
residual mineral usage. The Project Site will help satisfy the rising demand for
certain raw materials that are needed to support the dynamic growth taking place in
the Inland Empire.
The following is a list of objectives that the Reclamation Plan is designed to
achieve:
I) To develop a clay resource that meets City of Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code Chapter 14.04.
2) To secure adequate clay reserves to provide a reliable and economic
source to add to Pacific Aggregates' and Pacific Clay's projected needs
through the next five (5) years and to provide mined excess aggregate fill
material and crushed rock for local and regional construction activities.
3) To develop a mining operation that is relatively close to Pacific Clay
brick production facility (3 miles to the north of the Project Site) and has
discreet direct access to a major 1-15 trucking transportation corridor so
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~
PAGE-5-~_OF 5()
REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
October 3,2006
PAGE 6
that truck traffic does not pass through residential neighborhoods to
deliver the mined product to its ultimate destinations.
4) To reclaim the Project Site in a way that limits off-site visual, noise, and
air quality impacts.
5) To reclaim the Project Site concurrently for post-mining uses which will
assist in the creation of pads suitable for commercial uses along 1-15 and
provide permanent open space in the northern reclamation areas.
6) To reclaim and maintain the Project Site as necessary to eliminate
hazards to public health and safety.
The Reclamation Plan has been prepared pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code Chapter 14.04. The Reclamation Plan proposes design treatments to buffer
proposed mining and restoration activities from neighboring residences and the
high school. Setback standards set forth in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and
conditions of approval will be used to further separate the proposed reclamation
uses from neighboring uses. With the implementation of mitigation contained in
the Reclamation Plan, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program, and conditions of approval, all potentially significant
environmental impacts have been mitigated to a level of insignificance.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Based upon an Initial Study conducted on the Reclamation Plan, Staff determined
that the Project may have potentially significant impacts on the environment.
However, after completing all technical studies, it was determined that, with
appropriate mitigation, all potentially significant effects could be mitigated to a
level of insignificance. Therefore, it was determined that the appropriate
environmental document for the Project is a mitigated negative declaration.
The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-06 has been prepared
pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21080.1 and Article 6 of the
California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") Guidelines (14 C.C.R. ~~ 15000
et seq.). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 2006-06 was submitted to the County Clerk of Riverside County
on May 8, 2006 for a 30-day public review period.
jo\I"jENDA ITEM NO. ~
PAGE b _OF SO
REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
October 3, 2006
PAGE 7
The Project Site is exempt from the provisions of the Western Riverside County
Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan pursuant to the terms of a settlement
agreement between Castle & Cooke and the County of Riverside.
The Project does not conflict with the environmental plans or policies of other
jurisdictions.
RECOMMENDA TION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2006-_
approving Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-06; adopt Resolution No.
2006-_ approving MSHCP Consistency, and adopt Resolution No. 2006-_
approving Reclamation Plan No. 2006-01. This recommendation is based on the
findings, exhibits and conditions of approval attached to this Staff Report.
Please note that pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code section 14.04.070,
action taken by the Planning Commission on the Reclamation Plan is final unless
appealed to the City Council. Any person wishing to file an appeal on the
Planning Commission's decision must do so within five (5) days of the Planning
Commission's decision.
PREPARED BY:
KIRT A. COURY, PROJECT PLANNER
APPROVED BY:
(blYl
Rolfe M. Preisendanz,
Director of Community Development
---------
ATTACHMENTS
1: Resolution No. 2006-_ approving Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-06
2: Resolution No. 2006-_ making Findings that the Project is Exempt from the
Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP)
3: Resolution No. 2006-_ approving Reclamation Plan No. 2006-01
4: Conditions of Approval
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~
PACE L ~~o,: 5 ()
-
REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
October 3,2006
PAGE 8
5: Exhibits
"A": Vicinity Map
"B": Location Map
"C": Site Plan
"D": Reclamation Plan
"E": Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-06
"F": Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)
"G": Department of Conservation letter dated March 20, 2006 and City's
responses thereto
ACENDA ITEM NO.
PAC~~.", '8
~
OF SO
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-06
WHEREAS, Pacific Aggregates, Inc. has filed an application with the City
of Lake Elsinore requesting review and approval of Reclamation Plan No. 2006-0 I
for a 211.40 acre site located on the east side of the 1-15 Freeway at the Nichols
Road intersection and commonly identifiable as APNs 389-200-015, -023, and
-024 (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the standards and requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code SS 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and
the CEQA Guidelines apply only to discretionary projects, which are defined in
CEQA Section 21065 as an activity which may cause either a direct physical
change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in
the environment and which includes the issuance to a person of a lease, permit,
license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies; and
WHEREAS, the Project is a discretionary project within the meaning of
Section 21065 of CEQA because it involves extensive reclamation activities which
may cause both a direct and indirect physical change in the environment and no
reclamation activities may begin on the Project site until the Planning Commission
approves the Reclamation Plan for the Project; and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study was conducted on the Project and revealed that
the Project may have potentially significant environmental impacts; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15070-15075, it was further
determined that all potentially significant environmental impacts could be
mitigated to a statistical level of insignificance and that it was appropriate to
prepare Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-01 to address the environmental
impacts of the project; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public meeting held with respect to
this item on October 3, 2006.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE ~
~
OF 50_
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE20F3
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Project and has
found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and determines the Project is
consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and determines that Mitigated
Negative Declaration No. 2006-06 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the
requirements of the CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines,
the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of the
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-06:
1. Revisions in the Project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the
applicant before a proposed mitigated negative declaration and initial study are
released for public review. would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a
point where clearly no significant effects would occur. The applicant and city
worked closely with representatives of South Coast Air Quality Management
District ("South Coast") to address potential degradation of air quality. South
Coast's comments to the Mitigated Negative Declaration were integrated into
the Project design.
The applicant has made revisions to the project and has agreed to specific
conditions which mitigate the potentially significant environmental effects of the
Project to a level of "less than significant. "
2. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the
agency, that the Project as revised may have significant effect on the
environment.
Pursuant to the evidence received in light of the whole record, the Project will
not have a significant effect on the environment considering the Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program, the Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring
Plan, and the conditions of approval.
3. The Reclamation Plan has been reviewed pursuant to CEQA and the City's
environmental review guidelines, and all significant adverse impacts from
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~
PAGe---.l.9-.0F So
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE30F3
reclamation of the surface mining operations are mitigated to the maximum
extent feasible.
Mitigated Negative Declaration 2006-06, the corresponding Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program, and the corresponding conditions of
approval mitigate all environmental effects to a statistical level of
insignificance.
SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of October, 2006,
by the following vote:
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
AYES: Commissioners:
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
Rolfe M. Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~
PAGE ,\ OF SO
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS
THAT THE PROJECT IDENTIFIED AS RECLAMTAION PLAN NO.
2006-01 IS EXEMPT FROM THE MULTI-SPECIES HABITAT
CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP)
WHEREAS, Pacific Aggregates Inc., has submitted an application for
Reclamation Plan 2006-01, located on the east side of the 1-15 Freeway at the
Nichols Road intersection and commonly identifiable as APNs 389-200-015,-023,
and -024 (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, Pacific Clay Products, Inc., Castle & Cooke Lake Elsinore
Outlet Centers, Inc., Castle & Cooke Corona, Inc., Gateway Business Park, LLC,
and Murdock Alberhill Ranch Limited Partnership, (collectively "Owner") entered
into that certain settlement agreement and memorandum of understanding (the
"Settlement Agreement") with the County of Riverside on February 24, 2004,
which exempts and excludes all of the Owner's properties (including present and
future uses and development of Owner's properties) from the MSHCP for all
purposes; and
WHEREAS, the Project site is owned by Castle & Cooke Lake Elsinore
Outlet Centers, Inc. and is covered by the terms of the Settlement Agreement and
is therefore exempt from the requirements of the MSHCP; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal.
Pub. Res. Code SS 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R.
SS 15000 et seq.), Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-01 and the
corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been prepared
to mitigate environmental impacts resulting from the Project to a level of
insignificance; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this
item on October 3, 2006.
ACENDA ITEM NO. 1
PAGE )~ OF 50
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE20F2
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission acknowledges the Settlement
Agreement which exempts and excludes this Project from the requirements of the
MSHCP for all purposes. Because the Project is exempt from the MSCHP, the
Planning Commission takes no further MSHCP action with regard to this Project.
SECTION 2. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of October, 2006,
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Rolfe M. Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
~
ACENDA iTEM NO.
PAGE_ \~ OF 50_
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
RECLAMATION PLAN NO. 2006-01
WHEREAS, Pacific Aggregates, Inc. has filed an application with the City
of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Reclamation Plan No. 2006-01 for a
211.40 acre site located on the east side of the 1-15 freeway at the Nichols Road
intersection and commonly identifiable as APNs 389-200-015, -023, and -024 (the
"Project"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 14.04 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of considering and approving, conditionally approving, or
denying Reclamation Plans; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal.
Pub. Res. Code SS 21-000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R.
SS 15000 et seq.), Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2006-06 and the
corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were prepared to
mitigate any potentially significant environmental effects of the Project to a
statistical level of insignificance; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this
item on October 3, 2006.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered and reviewed the
Project and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and
determines that the Project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
and the provisions of the state Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (Cal.
Pub. Res. Code SS 2710 et seq.: "SMARA").
~
ACENDA lTEM NO.
PAce ,~ Of 50 -
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE 2 OF 6
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 14.04 of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the
approval of Reclamation Plan No. 2006-01:
1. The granting of the permit or approval of the plan will not be detrimental to the
public health, welfare or safety or injurious to the property in such zone or
vicinity.
Approval of the Reclamation Plan will not be detrimental to the public health,
welfare or safety or injurious to neighboring properties given that the
Reclamation Plan was designed to minimize exposure of the mining and
reclamation activities to the public. The Project design encourages
concentration of mining and reclamation activities within the inner-most
boundaries of the Project site and requires set backs consistent with the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code. The Project has been conditioned to comply with the
Lake Elsinore Noise Ordinance and is subject to all enforcement provisions of
the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. In addition, the potentially significant
environmental effects of the Project have been analyzed and have been
mitigated to a statisticalleve! of insignificance pursuant to Mitigated Negative
Declaration 2006-06 and the corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program.
2. The Reclamation Plan complies with SMARA ~ 2772 and ~ 2773, and any
other applicable provisions.
Reclamation Plan 2006-01 contains all of the required elements outlined in
SMARA S 2772. The Reclamation Plan identifies the name and address of the
surface mining operator, the quantity and type of minerals to be extracted,
proposed initiation and termination dates, maximum anticipated depth of
surface mining operation, maps describing the topographic details of the
Project, a time schedule for mining operations, a description of proposed use or
potential uses after reclamation, a description of reclamation, and an
assessment of the effect of implementation of the plan.
Additionally, Reclamation Plan 2006-01 complies with the standards set forth
in SMARA S 2773 because the Reclamation Plan was drafted and tailored
specifically to the Nichols Canyon Mine property.
ACENDA ITEM NO. :;A
PAGE ,) OF Su
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE30F6
3. The Reclamation Plan complies with applicable requirements of State
regulations (14 C.C.R. SS3500-3505, and SS 3700-3713).
Reclamation Plan No. 2006-01 was reviewed pursuant to the State Mining and
Geology Board reclamation regulations. Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, Section 3502 identifies six elements which shall be discussed in a
Reclamation Plan. Those six elements include: the environmental setting of the
site, the public health and safety, the designed steepness and proposed
treatment of mined lands' final slopes, areas mined to produce additional
material for backfilling and grading, disposition of old equipment, and
temporary stream or watershed diversion. Reclamation Plan No. 2006-01
extensively discusses each of these elements. The Reclamation Plan is designed
to minimize impacts to the surrounding community and environment. The
Reclamation Plan satisfies all of the provisions of the City's Surface Mining
and Reclamation Chapter (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter 14.04),
which is the City's implementation of SMARA.
4. The Reclamation Plan and potential use of reclaimed land pursuant to the plan
are consistent with the Chapter 14.04 and the City's General Plan all other
applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
According to the Lake Elsinore General Plan Land Use Element, the City is
experiencing significant growth opportunities in terms of new development and
redevelopment. A majority of the City's acreage is under construction,
approved for construction, or is planned for development. The Land Use
Element encourages future urbanization while preserving the environmental
characteristics which contribute to a quality of life that attracts residents to the
community. Approval of Reclamation Plan 2006-01 assists the City's
development goals and intent of the Land Use Element by encouraging the
extractive industry and enabling production of necessary raw materials to
sustain future development within the City and surrounding areas.
The Reclamation Plan is also consistent with the terms of the Open Space
Element of the General Plan. The primary focus of the Open Space Element is
to encourage conservation, protection and proper management of natural
resources within the City. The purpose of the Reclamation Plan is to reclaim,
rehabilitate, and revegetate areas that have been disturbed by mining activities.
ACENDA ITEM NO. 1
PACE \ b OF SO
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE40F6
Indeed, a substantial number of acres of the reclaimed land will be reserved for
open space designation throughout the reclamation process.
Finally, the Project has been reviewed pursuant to the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code Chapter 14.04 and is consistent with the standards set forth therein.
5. The Reclamation Plan has been reviewed pursuant to CEQA and the City's
environmental review guidelines, and all significant adverse impacts from
reclamation of the surface mining operations are mitigated to the maximum
extent feasible.
Pursuant to the CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 2006-06 and the corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program were prepared for the Project. Implementation of the
mitigation contained in those documents will reduce any potentially significant
environmental effects of the Project to a statistical level of insignificance.
6. The land and/or resources such as water bodies to be reclaimed will be restored
to a condition that is compatible with, and blends in with, the surrounding
natural environment, topography, and other resources, or that suitable off-site
development will compensate for related disturbance to resource values.
The Project lies within the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan and is subject to the
zoning requirements set forth therein. The Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan zones
the 211.40 acre site for both commercial and open space uses. The grading
plan and anticipated schedule of revegetation set forth in the Reclamation Plan
are consistent with the underlying zoning designations and encourage
maximum use of the property. Any disturbance to the land or other natural
resources caused by mining activities will be rehabilitated pursuant to the terms
of the Reclamation Plan. The City Engineering Division has conditioned the
Project to maintain finished slopes of 2H: 1 V, which is consistent with
engineering industry standards. Such slopes can safely abut commercial uses
and are less likely to fail when compared to steeper slopes. In addition, the
vegetation palette includes native plants which will encourage the
establishment and proliferation of other native species.
ACENDA ITEM NO.
PACE \ \.
~
OF 50
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE 5 OF6
7. The Reclamation Plan will restore the mined lands to a usable condition which
is readily adaptable for alternative land uses consistent with the General Plan
and applicable resource plan.
Reclamation Plan 2006-01 is designed to comply with the City's Surface
Mining and Reclamation policies set forth in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
Chapter 14.04 and the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No.3.
Reclamation of the mined lands will result in approximately 98.48 acres of
flatly graded land which is commercially zoned under the Alberhill Ranch
Specific Plan Amendment No.3. This commercially zoned property affronts the
1-15 freeway and Nichols Road, which is a prime commercial corridor within
the City. The approximate 98.48 acres will be restored to support future open
space and commercial uses.
8. A written response to the State Department of Conservation has been prepared,
describing the disposition of major issues raised by that Department. Where the
City's position is at a variance with the recommendations and objections raised
by the State Department of Conservation, said response shall address, in detail,
why specific comments and suggestions were not accepted.
On March 20, 2006, the City of Lake Elsinore Planning Department received
comments from the Department of Conservation regarding the Nichols Mine
Reclamation Plan. Comments identified in that letter have been incorporated
into the Final Reclamation Plan and will be forwarded to the Department of
Conservation.
SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PACE \ i
~
OF 50
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE60F6
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of October, 2006,
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Rolfe M. Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~
PAGE \~ OF 50
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RECLAMATION PLAN NO. 2006-01,
AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-06
PACIFIC AGGREGATES, INC., APN(s) 389-200-015, 023 & 024
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. Pacific Aggregates, Inc. (the "Applicant") shall defend, indemnify, and hold
harmless the City, its officials, officers, consultants, employees, and/or
agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its officials,
officers, employees, or agents concerning the project attached hereto.
Applicant shall enter into a pre-dispute indemnity agreement with the City
within 30 days after project approval.
PLANNING DIVISION
2. Approval of the Reclamation Plan will lapse and be void unless reclamation
activity is initiated within one (1) year after the completion of mining activity
as provided in the Reclamation Plan (phase 4). The Applicant may request
from the Planning Commission an extension of time on the Reclamation Plan
so long as the request is submitted to the Planning Department at least one (1)
month prior to the expiration of the originally approved Reclamation Plan.
The Planning Commission shall consider the extension request at a public
hearing. No extension of time shall exceed a period of one (1) year.
3. All conditions of approval shall be reproduced in Appendix C of the
Reclamation Plan within fifteen (15) days after approval by the Planning
Commission. The Applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement
of Conditions" form within 30 days of approval of the Reclamation Plan by
the Planning Commission and shall return the executed original to the
Planning Division for inclusion in the case records.
4. All site improvements approved with this request shall be constructed as
indicated on the approved Reclamation Plan. Revisions to approved plans
shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Commission except
as otherwise noted in these conditions.
5. Structures shall be placed on-site as depicted on the Reclamation Plan Figure
8A. The Community Development Director or Designee may approve minor
modifications to the placement of structures on-site.
ACENDA ITEM NO.
'PACE ciO OF SO
~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RECLAMATION PLAN NO. 2006-01,
AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-06
PACIFIC AGGREGATES, INC., APN(s) 389-200-015, 023 & 024
6. Landscaping. Landscaping shall be undertaken consistent with the
standards set forth in the Reclamation Plan, the Habitat Mitigation and
Monitoring Plan, and the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated
Negative Declaration.
7. The proposed project shall comply with the zoning and development
standards identified in the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan and corresponding
amendments thereto.
8. Truck Maintenance. All trucks exiting the Nichols Mine project site shall
be washed and rattled to prevent materials from spilling onto adjacent roads
and streets.
9. The Applicant shall submit a temporary wall and fence plan for screening
purposes subject to the review and approval of the Community Development
Director or Designee.
10. The Applicant shall place a weatherproof 3 'x3' sign at the entrance to the
project site identifying the approved days and hours of operation and a
statement that complaints regarding the operations of the mining project be
lodged with the City of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division, which
can be reached at (951) 674-3124.
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
11. Air and Water Pollution. All operations shall be conducted in compliance
with the rules, regulations, and requirements of the South Coast Air Quality
Management District and the State Water Quality Control Board. Applicant
shall provide to the Community Development Director or Designee a copy
of any and all permits secured on behalf of the Applicant from either South
Coast Air Quality Management District and/or the State Water Quality
Control Board.
12. Noise Suppression.
A. All equipment and premises employed in conjunction with any of the
uses identified in the Reclamation Plan shall be constructed, operated
and maintained in accordance with Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
Section 17.78.
AGENDA ITEM NO. J...
PACE ~\ OF SO
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RECLAMATION PLAN NO. 2006-01,
AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-06
PACIFIC AGGREGATES, INC., APN(s) 389-200-015, 023 & 024
B. Those standards for noise suppression, set forth in Chapter 17.78 of
the LEMC, which apply to construction activities shall apply to
activities undertaken pursuant to the Reclamation Plan.
C. The project shall not exceed the maximum permissible sound levels
by receiving land use set forth in Chapter 17.78 Section .060 of the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. During those times not restricted in
Section 17.78.060 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the project
shall not exceed an exterior noise standard of 60 dB Ldn at the outer
project boundary adjacent to residential and other sensitive land uses.
D. The Applicant shall submit a "Noise Control Plan" identifying
anticipated operating noise levels at the outer project boundaries. The
Noise Control Plan shall ensure adequate operating noise control
measures through the provision of mufflers and the physical
separation of machinery and maintenance areas from adjacent
residential uses and other sensitive land uses. The Noise Control Plan
shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community
Development Director or Designee.
13. Hours of Operation. The Applicant shall limit mining and reclamation
operations to the hours of 7 :00 a.m. to 7 :00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
No mining or reclamation operations shall occur on Legal Holidays.
14. Light. All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site so as
not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets or allow illumination
above the horizontal plane of the fixture.
15. Biology/Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan
A. Nesting Surveys. The Applicant shall conduct pre-grading nesting
bird surveys in any areas where earth-moving is to occur within the
nesting season (February 1 through August 31), and in areas where
there is sufficient habitat to promote nesting.
B. Revegetation. Per the revegetation efforts, the Applicant shall hydro-
seed the re-created slopes with a native erosion control seed mix as
well as include native trees and shrubs from container plantings.
Further, the Applicant shall plant a native wildflower mix on the
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~
PACE ~~~OF SO
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RECLAMATION PLAN NO. 2006-01,
AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-06
PACIFIC AGGREGATES, INC., APN(s) 389-200-015, 023 & 024
lower elevations within the pad areas.
C. Irrigation. Once hydro-seeding has occurred, the Applicant shall be
responsible for supplying sufficient irrigation to adequately germinate
and establish the applied seed, particularly during the first winter and
spring following planting. The container stock shall be irrigated as
long as necessary to establish the root systems in the native soils,
possibly as long as one to two years. Areas where inadequate seed
establishment has taken place shall be re-sprayed or re-seeded within
30 days of identifying the inadequacy.
D. Plant Replacement. The Applicant shall be responsible for replacing
any dead or terminally diseased plants until the final success criteria
have been met. The replacement plants shall be of the same species,
size, and spacing as those plant species being replaced.
E. Non-Native Plants. The Applicant shall initially remove all non-
native. invasive species on the reclamation site. No area shall be
allowed to have more than twenty percent (20% )of the ground cover
provided by non-native plants. If inspections reveal that non-native
plants are becoming established on the reclamation site, removal shall
immediately be initiated.
F. Monitoring and Performance Criteria. The Applicant shall follow
the vegetation monitoring procedures, and achieve the target functions
and values as described the Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan
(HMMP). Further, the Applicant shall meet the "density performance
criteria" as identified in Table 9 of the HMMP. In five years, should
the vegetation not sufficiently be established to meet the final success
criteria, vegetation monitoring shall be conducted until the success
criteria have been met for a minimum of two years without human
intervention.
G. Final Success Criteria. When the five-year monitoring period is
complete, if all performance standards have been met, the Applicant
shall request written confirmation from the City of Lake Elsinore and
California Department of Conservation, Office of Mine Reclamation
verifying final success criteria have been met. For each year in which
the Applicant fails to meet the performance standards, one (1)
,A.GENDA ITEM NO. ~
PAGE ~) Of SO
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RECLAMATION PLAN NO. 2006-01,
AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-06
PACIFIC AGGREGATES, INC., APN(s) 389-200-015, 023 & 024
additional year of re-vegetation and monitoring shall be required
using the same performance criteria as listed for year five. At the City
of Lake Elsinore's and California Department of Conservation's,
Office of Mine Reclamation discretion, if the final success criteria are
not met, the Applicant shall prepare an analysis of the cause(s) of
failure(s) and propose remedial actions for approval.
H. Performance Extension. If substantial non-compliance with the
performance and/or final success criteria occurs, the Applicant will
consult the City of Lake Elsinore and California Department of
Conservation, Office of Mine Reclamation to determine whether
corrective measures and an extension of the five-year monitoring
period will be necessary.
I. Reporting. At the end of each of the five monitoring period growing
seasons, an annual report shall be prepared for submittal to the City of
Lake Elsinore and California Department of Conservation, Office of
Mine Reclamation. by June I st of each year for the duration of the
monitoring period. These reports shall assess both attainment of yearly
target criteria and progress toward final success criteria, as well as any
revisions to the approved Reclamation Plan. These reports shall
include the survival of tree and shrub container stock. The number of
species of plants replaced, an overview of the mitigation effort, the
method used to assess these parameters, and photos from designed
photo stations shall also be included.
J. Contractor Education. Prior to the commencement of grading or any
construction work, the Applicant shall provide all contractors
involved with copies of the Reclamation Plan, Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Plan, Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan, and the
Conditions of Approval. The Applicant shall educate the contractors
on all aspects of these documents, including but not limited to site
protection, maintenance inspections, landscape procedures and
monitoring. Copies of all of these documents shall be kept on-site at
all times.
K. Access Control. The Applicant shall delineate the service access
routes to keep the contractors within these routes as well as prevent
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~
PAGE ~u. OF 50
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RECLAMATION PLAN NO. 2006-01,
AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-06
PACIFIC AGGREGATES, INC., APN(s) 389-200-015, 023 & 024
them from entering sensitive or recently reclaimed areas.
L. Water Quality. No debris, soil, silt, sand, rubbish, cement or
concrete or washings thereof, oil or petroleum products or washings
thereof, shall be allowed to enter into or be placed in a manner where
it may be washed via rainfall or run-off into local creeks. Further, the
Applicant shall comply with the requirements of NPDES by
implementing a SWPPP that incorporates BMPs and a Spill
Prevention, Control and Counter-measure Plan (SPCC) throughout the
operation of all reclamation activities.
M. Clean Up. All clean-up operations shall be conducted within one
year of the termination of mining. Scrap material, refuse, unwanted
equipment, and surplus materials shall be removed and disposed of at
an appropriate landfill site.
16. The Applicant shall comply with all mItIgation and recommendations
identified in both the Mitigation Monitoring Program and the Habitat
Mitigation and Monitoring Program and which accompany Mitigated
Negative Declaration No. 2006-06.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
17. The Applicant shall provide detention and desiltation basin sized to detain
the increase in the 100 year storm flow between the developed and
undeveloped site conditions.
18. The slope on the north and east sides of the project shall be improved with
long-term erosion control planting.
19. Sight distance for ingress/egress at all driveways shall meet CalTrans
standard for site distance.
20. Parking shall not be allowed on Nichols Road.
21. Provide for on-site loading and unloading of inventory.
22. Public Works requirements identified in the approved Reclamation Plan
shall be complied with as a condition of the Reclamation Plan.
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~
PACE ~S OF 50_
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RECLAMATION PLAN NO. 2006-01,
AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-06
PACIFIC AGGREGATES, INC., APN(s) 389-200-015, 023 & 024
23. All temporary access private roadway improvements shall be installed prior
to the export of on-site material.
24. The Applicant shall pay any required plan review and site inspection fees.
25. Applicant shall acquire off-site easements as needed.
26. Prior to the export of on-site material, the Applicant shall install a city
standard public street light-at the project entrance subject to the review and
approval of the City Engineer.
27. Prior to the export of on-site material, the Applicant shall submit a traffic
control plan showing all traffic control systems for the project to be
approved by the City Engineer or his/her Designee. All traffic control
systems shall be installed prior to export of on site material.
28. Approval of the Reclamation Plan shall constitute conceptual grading plan
approval.
29. All soils, geology and seismic reports are contained in the Reclamation Plan
and shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineering Division prior
to the export of on-site material.
30. Slopes of Excavations. No production from an open pit quarry shall be
permitted which creates a post mining slope steeper than two foot (2')
horizontal to one foot (I ') vertical. Provided, however, that a steeper slope
may be permitted during mining operations where soil content or material is
such that a vertical-cut excavation is safe in the opinion of the Division of
Industrial Safety, Department of Industrial Relations of the State of
California and such opinion shall be memorialized in writing and submitted
to the City for approval by the City Engineer.
31. All grading for reclamation purposes shall be done under the supervision of
a geotechnical engineer. All slopes steeper than 2 to 1 shall be approved by
the City Engineer for stability and proper erosion control prior to the export
of on-site material. All manufactured slopes greater than 30 feet in height
shall comply with City Standards requiring a six foot (6') bench for every 30
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~
PACE ~~ OF 50_
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RECLAMATION PLAN NO. 2006-01,
AND MITIGATED NEGA TIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-06
PACIFIC AGGREGATES, INC., APN(s) 389-200-015, 023 & 024
vertical feet of slope. Said slopes shall be re-Iandscaped in accordance with
the Reclamation Plan Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan.
32. Prior to the export of on-site material, the Applicant shall provide the City a
photographic baseline record of the condition of all proposed public City
haul roads. In the event of damage to such roads, Applicant shall pay full
cost of restoring public roads to the baseline condition. A bond may be
required to ensure payment of damages to the public right-of-way, subject to
the approval of the City Engineer.
33. Individual lot drainage shall be conveyed to a detention/treatment facility as
depicted in the Reclamation Plan.
34. All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or
shall be collected, conveyed and released consistent with historic flows and
patterns as described in the approved Reclamation Plan.
35. Applicant .shall satisfy all requirements of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
Section 15.64 regarding flood hazard regulations.
36. Applicant shall satisfy all requirements of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
Section 15.68 regarding flood plain management.
37. Applicant shall submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and
approval by City Engineer. Applicant shall mitigate any flooding and/or
erosion caused by reclamation of the site and diversion of drainage
consistent with standards established by the Riverside County Flood Control
District.
38. Private storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately marked to prevent
illegal dumping in the drain system consistent with the standards established
by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board.
39. Historic flow patterns & rates shall be preserved. 10-year storm runoff shall
be contained within the curb and the 100-year storm runoff shall be
contained with the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria is
exceeded, drainage facilities shall be installed.
AGENDA I~NO. ~
PACE -ell OF SO
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RECLAMATION PLAN NO. 2006-01,
AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-06
PACIFIC AGGREGATES, INC., APN(s) 389-200-015, 023 & 024
40. In the event historic storm flows are exceeded or reduced, the Applicant
shall submit a drainage acceptance letter from adjacent downstream property
owner(s) for out-letting the proposed storm water run-off on private property
prior to discharge of storm water run-off.
41. Applicant shall install BMP's using the best available technology to mitigate
any urban pollutants from entering the watershed. The operator shall prevent
trackout onto public highways. If trackout occurs, the operator shall take
preventative and remedial measures immediately. (Hardy's suggestion is
that Condition #'s 39, 40, 41, and 42 are duplicated with condition #65; can
we combine or eliminate one set?)
42. The Applicant shall comply with State Law and provide a SWPPP for
construction and post construction which describes BMP's that will be
implemented for the development and including maintenance
responsibilities. The owner operator can comply by submitting a "Notice of
Intent" (NOI), develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan (SWPPP) a monitoring program and reporting plan for the surface mine
site.
43. Education guidelines and BMP's shall be provided to employees of the
development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other
environmental awareness education materials on best construction and
operation practices that contribute to protection of stormwater quality and
meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County
NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan.
44. Applicant shall construct the storm water detention facility per the
Reclamation Plan and utilize BMP's that will reduce storm water erosion the
temporary Reclamation Plan areas.
45. At the time the county adopts, as part of any ordinance, regulations specific
to the N.P.D.E.S., this project (or subdivision) shall comply with them.
46. All on-site Roads and Driveways. BMPS, established by the South Coast
Air Quality Management District, shall be implemented and all roads and
driveways shall be kept wet while being used or shall be treated with oil,
asphaltic concrete or concrete, or other palliative to prevent the emission of
dust.
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~
PAGe J.~ OF 50
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RECLAMATION PLAN NO. 2006-01,
AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-06
PACIFIC AGGREGATES, INC., APN(s) 389-200-015, 023 & 024
47. Access Roads. All private access roads leading off any paved public street
onto the Nichols Mine project site shall be paved to a minimum width of
twenty four feet (24') with asphaltic concrete or an equivalent material
approved by the City Engineer or Designee, not less than three inches in
thickness with adequate compacted base material for not less than the first
one hundred feet (100') of said access road.
48. Intersection site distance shall meet the design criteria of the CAL TRANS
Design Manual (particular attention should be taken for intersections on the
inside of curves). A special limited use easement must be recorded to limit
the slope, type of landscaping and wall placement to preserve adequate site
distance.
49. Intersecting streets on the inside radius of a curve will only be permitted
when adequate sight distance is verified by a registered civil engineer.
50. Existing access easements over property must be addressed to the
satisfaction of the affected owners prior to export of on-site material.
51. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal and
recycling, the Applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R, Inc., for
removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other
rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all
other phases of construction.
52. The City of Lake Elsinore contracts with Riverside County for mining
inspection and compliance. All applicable fees for inspection with respect to
the mining operation shall be paid directly to Riverside County Building and
Safety Mining Division. Copies of these documents shall be provided to the
Engineering Division for the City of Lake Elsinore to be kept in the project
files.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE MINING AND RECLAMATION CONDITIONS
53. Safety Berm. A four (4) foot, minimum vertical height, safety berm, shall
be installed at the top of all cut/fill slopes at least three (3) feet in width.
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~
PAGE ~~ OF 50
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RECLAMATION PLAN NO. 2006-01,
AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-06
PACIFIC AGGREGATES, INC., APN(s) 389-200-015, 023 & 024
54. Benches & Slopes
A. During the Reclamation operation, benches and slopes shall be
installed according to the approved Reclamation Plan.
B. Working slopes below benches shall not be steeper than IH:IV.
Finished slopes shall not exceed 2H: 1 V.
55. Signage
A. Signs shall be installed at the top of all manufactured slopes (cut or
fill), at intervals not greater than 100 linear feet.
B. Each sign shall read "DANGER" "OPEN PIT MINE" "STEEP
SLOPE". Signs shall be at least 18" X 18" square with contrasting
background to lettering. (i.e.: white background and black lettering).
C. Perimeter signs around the approved Reclamation Plan or Surface
Mine boundaries shall be installed with contrasting
lettering/background warning of "DANGER" "KEEP OUT" and
"MINERAL RESOURCE ZONE" or "SURFACE MINING
OPERATION".
56. Trash & Debris Removal. The parcel(s) where the mine is located shall be
kept free of trash (including old tires) and other debris. There shall be no
importing of recyclable materials or construction debris without a specific
permit for that activity.
57. Contractor Equipment Storage. All non-mining equipment must be stored
in a designated area permitted for "Contractor Storage." A "Contractor
Storage" permit must be obtained from the Planning Department prior to
storage of any non-mining equipment.
58. Vehicle Storage. There shall be no storage of passenger vehicles, campers,
travel trailers or other personal property that is not related directly to the
mining of minerals at this site.
ACENDA ITEM r~o. ~
PAGE 30 OF SO
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RECLAMATION PLAN NO. 2006-01,
AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-06
PACIFIC AGGREGATES, INe., APN(s) 389-200-015, 023 & 024
59. Temporary/Portable Office. Temporary/portable office trailers are
permitted provided they are installed after a building permit is obtained.
Other structures for night watchman security must be installed or
constructed by building permit.
60. Importing Concrete & AC. There shall be no importing and/or storage of
used concrete, asphalt or other inert construction materials for recycling
without the specific approval of the Planning Division.
61. Importing/Storing of Vegetation. There shall be no importing and/or
storage of any cut vegetation without specific approval of the Planning
Division (Environmental).
62. Annual Financial Assurance Review.
A. Each year after the 1 st year of land disturbed under the Reclamation
Plan, the Applicant shall review the financial assurance on file with
the City of Lake Elsinore.
B. The Applicant shall submit a written report to the Engineering
Division indicating any changes to disturbed land or other conditions
that could increase or decrease the amount of financial assurance.
This report shall also indicate the financial assurance has been
reviewed and include a new cost estimate if needed as described
below.
C. After the financial assurance review, if the total dollar amount
indicates an increase or decrease of more or less than five (5) percent
of the financial assurances on file, the Applicant shall submit a new
cost estimate to the Engineering Division taking into consideration all
information addressed in the California Resources Code section
2773.1 (a) (3) using the forms provided by the California Department
of Conservation's internet web site.
D. At least every five (5) years after the initial land is disturbed, the
Applicant must submit a new cost estimate taking into consideration
all information addressed in the California Resources Code section
2773.1 (a) (3) using the forms provided by the California Department
of Conservation's internet web site.
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~-
PAGE_ 3\ OF 50_
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RECLAMATION PLAN NO. 2006-01,
AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-06
PACIFIC AGGREGATES, INC., APN(s) 389-200-015, 023 & 024
63. Property Line Setbacks. There shall be a graded setback from all property
lines of not less than 10 feet from all cut/fill slopes per the approved
Reclamation Plan.
64. In all other areas within the boundaries of the Nichols Mine, the provisions
of Lake Elsinore Grading Ordinance shall be followed unless modified by
these conditions.
65. Building/Grading Permits. The provisions of the City of Lake Elsinore
Grading Ordinance shall be enforced for all construction within the Nichols
Mine project site boundaries unless specifically regulated by another
approved condition of the Reclamation Plan.
66. Annual Report Information. The Applicant shall submit to the
Engineering Division with the annual report the following information:
A. Indicate mine proximity to the permit boundaries by topography;
B. Indicate maximum depth of excavated areas;
C. Provide quantity in cubic yards and tons of materials mined during the
reporting period;
D. Certify all excavated areas are within the limits of the vested Surface
Mining Permit and RP 112 issued by the County of Riverside, and the
Reclamation Plan approved by the City of Lake Elsinore;
E. Provide data indicating any reclaimed land during the reporting
period;
F. A certified engineering geologist or geotechnical engineer shall
inspect all excavated slopes within the permitted boundaries (active or
inactive) for slope stability. The Applicant shall provide to the City
Engineer a copy of the inspection report.
G. NOTE: At least every three years of operation, the Applicant shall
provide to Engineering, aerial topography showing incremental and
ACENOA ITEM NO. ~
PACe 3~ OF SO
1 T
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RECLAMATION PLAN NO. 2006-01,
AND MITIGATED NEGA TIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-06
PACIFIC AGGREGATES, INC., APN(s) 389-200-015, 023 & 024
total changes to excavations. This will include cross-sectional maps
showing berms, slope angles and benches of all excavations.
67. Public Improvements that require grading, filling, over excavation and
recompaction, and base or paving which requires a grading permit, are
subject to the included Engineering Division's conditions of approval.
Furthermore, all Reclamation Plan grading shall conform to the approved
Reclamation Plan.
68. NPDES/SWPPP. The Applicant shall provide to the Engineering Division
evidence of compliance with the following: "Effective March 10, 2003
owner operators of grading or construction projects are required to comply
with the N.P.D.E.S. (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System)
requirement to obtain coverage under the general industrial permit from the
State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB). The permit requirement
applies to grading and construction sites of one acre or larger.
69. Geotechnical/Soils Reports. All grading shall be in conformance with the
recommendations of the geotechnical/soils reports as approved by the City
Engineer and as integrated into the Reclamation Plan.
70. Max Slope Ratio. Graded slopes shall be limited to 2H: 1 V unless otherwise
approved by the City Engineer.
71. Slope Stability Analysis. A slope stability report shall be submitted in the
annual report to the City Engineer.
72. Drainage Design QI00. Any public drainage facilities shall be designed in
accordance with Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation
District's standards, and shall at a minimum, accommodate 100-year storm
flows. Additionally, Engineering Division conditional approval of this
application includes an expectation that the Reclamation Plan reviewed and
approved complies with any WQMP (Water Quality Management Plan)
required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board for urban
development pollutants.
73. Minimum Drainage Grade. Minimum drainage grade shall be I % except
on portland cement concrete where 0.5% shall be the minimum.
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~
PACE 3:S OF sn
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RECLAMATION PLAN NO. 2006-01,
AND MITIGA TED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2006-06
PACIFIC AGGREGATES, INC., APN(s) 389-200-015, 023 & 024
74. Slope Setbacks. All excavated or graded slopes shall have setbacks from
buildings and property lines per the standards contained in the Reclamation
Plan.
75. Private Roads. Construction of a private road shall conform to the
approved Reclamation Plan.
76. Update Financial Assurance. Prior to approval of the Reclamation Plan, a
Financial Assurance cost estimate must be submitted to meet current mining
activity and conditions. The information contained therein shall consider
reclamation standards in use today as well as costs reflecting inflation
factors for the end of the project.
77. NOTE: At least every three years of operation, the Applicant shall provide
the City of Lake Elsinore Engineering Division with aerial topography
showing incremental and total changes to excavations. This will include
cross-sectional maps showing berms, slope angles and benches of all
excavations.
ACENOA ITEM NO. ~
" PAOE :>~_OF 5'0
ALBERHILL \
('
'}
~
Local
Vicinity
Map
-. "-
I -',
I /
I "....,
I
[10.................
................
....-............
......-.........
.-...............
................
.................
................
.................
...............
~
EXISTING LAKE ELSINORE
OUTLET CENTER
EXISTING PHASES "-IV
PROJECT SITE
~~G_JlJJ
CITY LIMITS
ALBERHILL RANCH SPECIFIC
PLAN, BOUNDARY
PROJECT
SITE
LJ-\}<E:
LAKE
ELSINORE
"A"
EXHIBIT _
No Sca~SNDAI
LOCATION MAP
RECLAMATION PLAN 2006-01
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2006-06
b
PROJECT SITE
~
1-- --
PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 3, 2006
EXHIBIT
\, 8 "
"I
ACENOA lTEM NO. ~
". PAce.-3..b-OF ~ 0 ~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA. RESOURCES AGENCY
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, GOVERNOR
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION
OFFICE OF MINE RECLAMATION
801 K STREET . MS 09-06 . SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814
PHONE 916/323-9198 . FAX 916/322-4862 . TOO 916/324-2555 . WEB SITE conservation.ca.gov
March 20, 2006
Rolfe M. Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
City of Lake Elsinore
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
Dear Mr. Preisendanz:
Pacific Aggregates, Inc. Nichols Canyon Mine Reclamation Plan
The Department of Conservation's Office of Mine Reclamation (OMR) has reviewed the
reclamation plan and financial assurance cost estimate (Cost Estimate) for Pacific
Aggregates Inc.'s Nichols Canyon Mine. The applicant is proposing to mine
11,000,000-12,000,000 tons of shale, clay, and aggregate from approximately 121.64
acres of a 211.40-acres site located in the northern part of the City of Lake Elsinore.
The applicant estimates that approximately 4,000,000 tons of material will be removed
annually. ==---==
The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA) (Public Resources Code
section 2710 et seq.) and the State Mining and Geology Board regulations for surface
mining and reclamation practice (California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 14,
Chapter 8, Article 1, section 3500 et seq., Article 9 section 3700 et seq.) require that
specific items be addressed or included in reclamation plans. The following comments
prepared by Will Arcand, Engineering Geologist, Karen Wiese, Plant Ecologist, and
Gregory Marquis, Engineering Geologist, are offered to assist in your review of this
project. We recommend that the reclamation plan be supplemented to fully address
these items.
Mining Operation and Closure
(Refer to SMARA sections 2770, 2772, 2773, CCR sections 3502,3709, and 3713)
SMARA section 2772(c)(1) requires that reclamation plans include the name and
address of the surface mining operator and any person(s) designated by the operator as
an agent for service of process. This information is not included in IN\:8 ~ W CWJ ~
as submitted, and should be included prior to lead agency approval 0 I!o U;
71ie (j)epartment of Conseroation's mission is to protect Californians ami tfieir en.vi nmen 6y:
Protecti1l(j Hoes alui propertyfrom eartfiqua/iss and fandsriaes; 'Ensuring safe mining ana l ana gas
Conseroing Ca[ifornia'sfarmIanc!; aTlaSaving energy ana resources tfirougfi re ding.
MAR 2 7 2006
-
~
PAGe
4.~ I?~
EXHIBIT
Rolfe M. Preisendanz
March 20, 2006
Page 2
SMARA section 2772(c)(3) requires that the reclamation plan include proposed initiation
and termination dates. Proposed initiation and termination dates are not clearly stated
within the reclamation plan. Page 9 of the reclamation plan indicates that native plant
restoration will take approximately 5 years following the initial 3 years of excavation.
Table 1 (Mine Phasing Data) indicates that total years of operation will be 6 (3 years of
"operations" plus 3 years of "reclamation monitoring"). Finally, Page 35 refers to the
year 2013 for completion of reclamation operations.
SMARA section 2772(c)(4) requires that the maximum anticipated depth of the surface
mining operation be indicated in the reclamation plan. It is difficult to ascertain the
depth of mining in reviewing the reclamation plan. We recommend that the depth of
mining be clearly stated for all mining phases and tied to a verifiable benchmark that
can be referenced in the field for compliance monitoring.
. SMARA Section 2772(c)(5) requires that the reclamation plan include a map with
boundaries and information pertinent to the reclamation of the site. Geologic
information and the proposed location of topsoil stockpiles should be included on maps
within the reclamation plan. OMR notes that a Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
and a Preliminary Slope Stability Analysis, prepared by Geotechnics Inc., have been
appended to the reclamation plan. However, no figures or plates depicting geologic or
geotechnical information for the proposed mining operation have been included with
these reports or within the reclamation plan. Similarly, the location of topsoil stockpiles
does not appear to be included on the reclamation plan maps. OMR recommends that
the reclamation plan include all pertinent geologic and geotechnical maps, figures,
plates, geologic cross sections for the proposed mining and reclamation area, and the
location of all topsoil stockpiles should be included on the mining and reclamation maps.
End land Use
(Refer to SMARA section 2772, CCR sections 3707, 3708)
Page 32 of the Reclamation Plan states that the proposed post-mining land uses, or
future land uses will be open space and commercial use. If commercial use is an end
use, then the grading plan and site compaction must comply with the City of Lake
Elsinore grading specifications and the Uniform Building Code.
Geotechnical Requirements
(Refer to CCR sections 3502, 3704)
As noted above, the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation appended to the
reclamation plan does not appear to be complete. Specifically, the Appendices and
Illustrations sections of this report are not included. OMR recommends that these
materials be included with the reclamation plan.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
"PAOe ~~ OF
~
50
Rolfe M. Preisendanz
March 20, 2006
Page 3
OMR notes that on Page 3 of the Preliminary Slope Stability Evaluation Geotechnics
Inc. recommends "that mapping and engineering analysis be performed once rock
exposures in the quarry become accessible." OMR concurs with this recommendation,
and recommends that the reclamation plan include specific requirements for conducting
supplementary slope stability analysis prior to final site grading.
HydroloQY and Water Quality
(Refer to SMARA sections 2772, 2773, CCR sections 3502, 3503,3706,3710,3712)
In it's discussion of Erosion and Sedimentation Control the reclamation plan uses the
terms "major precipitation events," "substantial erosion," and "surface instability." OMR
recommends that these terms be clearly defined within the reclamation plan. Defining
these terms will enable the operator to establish specific quantitative thresholds that will
trigger the implementation of erosion control measures.
In several instances, the reclamation plan mentions that the project will comply with
national and state requirements for control of storm water runoff. OMR recommends
that the lead agency require, as a condition of reclamation plan approval, that an
approved California State Water Resources Control Board Industrial Storm Water
General Permit be appended to the reclamation pla.n.
CCR section 3706(d) requires that erosion control measures, including sediment ponds,
shall be designed to handle runoff from not less than the 20-year/1 hour intensity storm
event. The submitted reclamation plan maps depict the location of a rip-rap energy
dissipator and several detention basins. OMR recommends that sizing design
specifications for these erosion control features, which have been prepared by a
qualified professional, be included in the reclamation plan.
Environmental Setting and Protection of Fish and Wildlife Habitat
(Refer to CCR sections 3502, 3503, 3703,3704,3705,3710,3713)
The Reclamation Plan states that three sensitive plant species could occur on site. It is
not clear from the information provided if focused surveys were conducted forthese
species. In addition, the Reclamation Plan states that a general biological assessment
was conducted over the project site on July 10, 2005. It is not clear from the data
gathered in a one-day summer survey if the survey was conducted at the optimum time
of the year to detect other sensitive plant and wildlife species. For many plant species,
July is too late in the growing season to detected annuals or spring-flowering species
that do not persist. It is not evident if a "general" biological assessment of one day is
sufficient to detect the all of the sensitive species listed in the Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP).
Resoiling and Revegetation
(Refer to SMARA section 2773, CCR sections 3503, 3704, 3705, 3707, 3711)
CCR Section 3711 establishes mandatory standards for topsoil salvage, maintenance,
and redistribution. The following items must be discussed in the reclamation plan:
~
AvENDA ITEM NO. ~
. PAGE_39.,_oF- SO .-
Rolfe M. Preisendanz
March 20, 2006
Page 4
a. The location of the topsoil stockpile(s) must be depicted on the site map.
b. The topsoil stockpiles must be signed in the field to prevent inadvertent use.
c. The stockpiles will be protected from wind and water erosion by planting with
an erosion control seed mix or applying a gravel mulch.
Baseline vegetation data is required under CCR 3705(a) in order to evaluate the
suitability of the proposed revegetation species and methods. There is a reference to
such data in the text but no details are given. If such data is included by reference to a
biological report, that report should be included with the reclamation plan.
CCR 3705(b) requires that test plots be conducted to determine the success of the
proposed revegetation measures. The reclamation plan must include the details of test
plot establishment.
Section 13.0 Revegetation contains the following discrepancies that must be clarified:
a. It is not clear what treatments besides hydroseeding will be applied to the
future development areas MR-1 through MR-4.
b. The seeding method for all areas shown in Figure 9 is hydroseeding, while in
the text, broadcast seeding is specified.
c. Figure 9, selected native plantings of trees and shrubs are specified in the
Reclamation Slope area, presumably either container stock or transplants
from the site. No mention is made in the text of planting stock or methods of
planting such, except a reference to "sel~cted plants" being salvaged for later
replanting.
d. There is no indication of which seeding and planting methods are to be used
and where, and the numbers, species, etc. of planting stock to be installed.
This information must be depicted on a site map.
It is not clear if the proposed species provided in Table 4 occur on site. A species list
for the site should be provided as part of the description of the environmental setting.
Only species that occur in the area should be used in the revegetation effort. We
recommend that site-specific or locally collected seed be used. Locally collected seeds
are better adapted to the specific climate, aspect, soil type and hydrologic regime of the
site. These adaptations will make the plants more competitive and better suited for
establishment and survival. A local source is defined as being as close to the same
geographic location or watershed, elevation, aspect, and soil type as the project site
The use of native shrub species in the proposed seed mix is commended, however,
some changes are recommended in order to improve the chances of successful
revegetation.
ACENOA ITEM NO.
PAOE_ 4 P OF
~
50
Rolfe M. Preisendanz
March 20, 2006
Page 5
a. The following shrub species are better planted from container stock and
protected from herbivores until established: manzanita, ceanothus, toyon, and
holly-leaved cherry.
b. The scrub oak should be planted from acorns.
c. Pursuant to CCR 3705(1) protection from predation must be provided. Wire or
plastic cages are commonly used to deter mammal browse.
d. The species list does not include any grasses or herbaceous perennials.
Grasses and herbaceous perennials are easy to establish from seed and can
be useful in preventing erosion, preventing weed invasion, and blending the
site with the surrounding environment during the period leading up to the
eventual development of mature chaparral habitat.
The species that will be used in the "native wildflowers" seed mix for the areas slated for
future development are not specified in the reclamation plan. Until such development
takes place, the area should be protected from wind and water erosion by seeding,
which should be specified in the plan (CCR 3705(g)). Revegetation success criteria for
these areas will be different from the open space areas.
CCR 3705(k) requires that noxious weeds be managed. The reclamation provides a
threshold of not more than 20 percent of ground cover of weed species. We highly
recommend that pampas grass and tree tobacco be completely eliminated from the site.
These species are highly invasive and could ultimately cost the operator more to
control.
CCR 3705(m) requires that vegetation sampling methods used in monitoring be laid out
in the plan. Sample sizes should be sufficient to achieve an 80 percent confidence level
in the mean cover and density measurements. Such standard statistical measures are
available in the literature, for example in C.D. Bonham 1988, "Measurements for
Terrestrial Vegetation." The monitoring methods, duration and frequency used should
be included in the reclamation plan.
The reclamation plan includes success criteria for site revegetation; however, several
items must be clarified to make these criteria valid.
a. The open space area and the commercial/industrial area should have
different success criteria since different seed mixes are being used.
b. The criterion for density should include a unit area. For example. the criterion
should be stated" a minimum of 8 out of the 16 perennial shrub species...
per 1 m X 100 meter plot. The unit area or size of the plot should be the same
size that was used in the baseline survey.
ACENOA ITEM NO.
PACE ~, OF 'SO_
~
Rolfe M. Preisendanz
March 20, 2006
Page 6
c. There is no criterion for density. Density, the number of plants per unit area,
must be specified.
Table 3 states that the fifth year will be the final year of monitoring. Monitoring must
continue until success criteria are achieved. In five years, the vegetation may not be
sufficiently established to meet the success criteria. We recommend that the
reclamation plan state that vegetation monitoring will be conducted until success criteria
have been met for a minimum of two years without human intervention.
Administrative Requirements
(Refer to SMARA sections 2772. 2773, 2774, 2776, 2777, PRe section 21151.7)
OMR requests clarification of the number listed as "2%" for the Overburden (in cubic
yards) in the Primary Reclamation Activities section under the grading and contouring of
slopes task.
In accordance with CCR Title 14, Section 3805, please ensure these comments are
addressed prior to acceptance of the financial assurance amount. Any changes in the
revised reclamation plan should also be itemized in the Cost Estimate. If you have any
questions regarding the cost estimates or associated references, please contact
Greg Marquis at (916) 323-9227.
If you have any further questions on these comments or require any assistance with
other mine reclamation issues, please contact me at (916) 323-8565.
(--_.-...._~--.........
;"Sincerely, i.. "\
I) ,
\ . \
)'-. ~~-",~\j-_=:~ ry
t/~ames S. Pompy, Manager
Reclamation Unit
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~
PACE ~ 'l OF So
City of 1}akE Ef1-ino7-E
(( <One CityJj, got dVto'teJJ
Mr. James S. Pompy,
Manager; Reclamation Unit
Department of Conservation
Office of Mine Reclamation
801 K Street, MS 09-06
Sacramento, CA 95814
SUBJECT: Response to Comments from OMR letter dated March 20, 2006
COMMENT: The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA) (Public
Resources Code section 2710 et seq.) and the State Mining and Geology Board
regulations for surface mining and reclamation practice (California Code of Regulations
(CCR) Title 14, Chapter 8, Article 1, section 3500 et seq, Article 9 section 3700 et seq.)
require that specific items be addressed or included in reclamation plans. The following
comments prepared by Will Arcand, Engineering Geologist, Karen Wiese, Plant
Ecologist and Gregory Marquis, Engineering Geologist, are offered to assist in your
review of this project. We recommend that the reclamation plan be supplemented to fully
address these items.
RESPONSE: The reclamation plan has been amended to address comments from the
Office of Mining and Reclamation. This letter serves as a key for the location of
responses to comments within the amended reclamation plan.
Minin2 Operation and Closure
COMMENT: SMARA section 2772(c)(1) requires that reclamation plans include the
name and address of the surface mining operator and any person(s) designated by the
operator as an agent for service of process. This information is not included in the
reclamation plan as submitted, and should be included prior to lead agency approval.
RESPONSE: The response to this comment can be found on page 6 of the amended
reclamation plan.
COMMENT: SMARA section 2772(c)(3) requires that the reclamation plan include
proposed initiation and termination dates. Proposed initiation and termination dates are
not clearly stated within the reclamation plan. Page 9 of the reclamation plan indicates
730 aouth o'V1ain at'tut, ..f!ake E[j.ino'te, eclf 92530 Clefephone (951) 674-3724 'Jax (957) 674-239A
wwwlake-e[j.ino'te.o't9 AGENDA ITEM NO. . d-- ,
PAGE 4) OF 50
that native plant restoration will take approximately 5 years following the initial 3 years
of excavation. Table 1 (Mine Phasing Data) indicates that total years of operation will
be 6 (3 years of "operations" plus 3 years of "reclamation monitoring "). Finally page
35 refers to the year 2013 for completion of reclamation operations.
RESPONSE: The response to this comment can be found within the introduction on
page 23, under the Reclamation Plan Phasing heading in the amended reclamation plan.
COMMENT: SMARA section 2772(c)(4) requires that the maximum anticipated depth of
the surface mining operation be indicated in the reclamation plan. It is difficult to
ascertain the depth of mining in reviewing the reclamation plan. We recommend that the
depth of mining be clearly stated for all mining phases and tied to a verifiable benchmark
that can be referenced in the field for compliance monitoring.
RESPONSE: The response to this comment can be found in Appendices E of the
Amended Reclamation Plan.
COMMENT: SMARA Section 2772(c)(5) requires that the reclamation plan include a
map with boundaries and information pertinent to the reclamation of the site. Geologic
information and the proposed location of topsoil stockpiles should be included on maps
within the reclamation plan. OMR notes that a Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
and a Preliminary Slope Stability Analysis , prepared by Geotechnics Inc., have been
appended to the reclamation plan. However, no figures or plates depicting geologic or
geotechnical information for the proposed mining operation have been included with
these reports or within the reclamation plan. Similarly, the location of topsoil stockpiles
does not appear to be included on the reclamation plan maps. OMR recommends that
the reclamation plan include all pertinent geologic and geotechnical maps, figures,
plates, geologic cross sections for the proposed mining and reclamation area, and the
location of all topsoil stockpiles should be included on the mining and reclamation maps.
RESPONSE: Please refer to Appendices A, B, E, I and J of the Amended Reclamation
Plan for figures, plates, geologic, and geotechnical information for the proposed mining
operation.
See Figure 10, page number 40 in the Amended Reclamation Plan for a map with
locations of "topsoil stockpiles." Also, please refer to the Habitat Mitigation and
Monitoring Plan (HMMP), which is Appendix G of the Amended Reclamation Plan for
more information regarding topsoil stockpiles and their location.
End Land Use
COMMENT: Page 32 of the Reclamation Plan states that the proposed post-mining
land uses, or future land uses will be open space and commercial use. If commercial use
is an end use, then the grading plan and site compaction must comply with the City of
Lake Elsinore grading specifications and the Uniform Building Code.
RESPONSE: The response to this comment can be found in Section C (Reclamation),
Subsection 1.0. (Subsequent Uses) now found on page 35.
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~
PAGE ~4 OF So
Geotechnical Requirements
COMMENT: As noted above, the Preliminary Geotechnical investigation appended to
the reclamation plan does not appear to be complete. Specifically, the Appendices and
Illustrations sections of this report are not included. OMR recommends that these
materials be included with the reclamation plan.
RESPONSE: Please refer to Appendices A, B, E, I and J of the Amended Reclamation
Plan. These appendices include figures, plates, geologic, and geotechnical information
for the proposed mining operation.
COMMENT: OMR notes that on Page 3 of the Preliminary Slope Stability Evaluation
Geotechnics Inc. recommends "that mapping and engineering analysis be performed
once rock exposures in the quarry become accessible." OMR concurs with the
recommendation and recommends that the reclamation plan include specific
requirements for conducting supplementary slope stability analysis prior to final site
grading.
RESPONSE: The response to this comment can be found in Section 7.0 Slopes and
Slope Treatment (page 38) of the Amended Reclamation Plan.
Hydrolo2Y and Water Quality
COMMENT: In its discussion of Erosion and Sedimentation Control the reclamation
plan uses the terms "major precipitation events," "substantial erosion, " and "surface
instability. " OMR recommends that these terms to clearly defined within the reclamation
plan. Defining these terms will enable the operator to establish specific quantitative
thresholds that will trigger the implementation of erosion control measures.
RESPONSE: The response to this comment can be found in Appendix D of the
Amended Reclamation Plan.
COMMENT: In several instances, the reclamation plan mentions that the project will
comply with national and state requirements for control of storm water runoff. OMR
recommends that the lead agency require, as a condition of reclamation plan approval,
that an approved California State Water Resources Control Board Industrial Storm
Water General Permit be appended to the reclamation plan.
RESPONSE: The response to this comment can be found in Appendix C of the
Amended Reclamation Plan. The Conditions of Approval, once adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, will be inserted in this section.
COMMENT: CCR section 3706(d) requires that erosion control measures, including
sediment ponds, shall be designed to handle runoff from not less that the 20-yearll hour
intensity storm event. The submitted reclamation plan maps depict the location of a rip-
rap energy dissipater and several detention basins. OMR recommends that sizing design
~
~_.~~>Ii .?Q"
specifications for these erosion control features, which have been prepared by a qualified
professional, be included in the reclamation plan.
RESPONSE: The response to this comment can be found as Appendix E in the
Amended Reclamation Plan.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Environmental Setting and Protection of Fish and Wildlife Habitat
COMMENT: The Reclamation Plan states that three sensitive plant species could occur
onsite. It is not clear from the information provided if focused surveys were conducted
for these species. In addition, the Reclamation Plan states that a general biological
assessment was conducted over the project site on July 10, 2005. It is not clear from the
data gathered in a one-day summer survey if the survey was conducted at the optimum
time of the year to detect other sensitive plant and wildlife species. For many plant
species, July is too late in the growing season to detected annuals or spring-flowering
species that do not persist. It is not evident if a "general" biological assessment of one
day is sufficient to detect the all of the sensitive species listed in the Multiple Species
Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP)
RESPONSE: The response to these comments can be found in Section A, subsection
1 0.0 (Wildlife) on page 17 of the Amended Reclamation Plan. Also, please refer to
Appendix F of the Amended Reclamation Plan for the General Biological Resources
Assessment Nichols Mining Site, dated October 26,2005.
The Reclamation Plan incorrectly stated that the general biological assessment was
conducted over the project site on July 10,2005. See page 18 of the reclamation plan for
the dates that site visits were made. Site visits and surveys were conducted on three days,
not one.
COMMENT: CCR Section 3711 establishes mandatory standards for topsoil salvage,
maintenance, and redistribution. The following items must be discussed in the
reclamation plan:
a. The location of the topsoil stockpilers) must be depicted on the site map.
b. The topsoil stockpiles must be signed in thefield to prevent inadvertent use.
c. The stockpiles will be protected from wind and water erosion by planting with an
erosion control seed mix or applying a gravel mulch.
Baseline vegetation data is required under CCR 3705(a) in order to evaluate the
suitability of the proposed revegetation species and methods. There is a reference to
such data in the text but no details are given. If such data is included by reference to a
biological report, that report should be included with the reclamation plan.
RESPONSE: For "a": Please see Figure lain the Amended Reclamation Plan. You
can also refer to Figure 6 in the appended Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan
(HMMP) for Post-Mining Reclamation of the Pacific Aggregates/Nichols Canyon Mine for
a map that depicts the location of topsoil stockpiles.
ACENDA ITEM NO.
PACE 4 ~ OF
~
For "b" and "c": Please refer to pages 20 and 39 (Section 12.0) in the Amended
Reclamation Plan. Please also refer to the HMMP (pages 22 and 23) for information
about topsoil stock piles. Both the Amended Reclamation Plan and HMMP also contain
graphics that show the location of topsoil stockpiles.
In terms of baseline vegetation data, please refer to page 48 under "Success Criteria" in
the Amended Reclamation Plan.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT: CCR 3705(b) requires that test plots be conducted to determine the
success of the proposed revegetation measures. The reclamation plan must include
details of test plot establishment.
RESPONSE: Please see response above.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT: Section 13.0 revegetation contains the following discrepancies that must
be clarified:
a. It is not clear what treatments besides hydroseeding will be applied to the future
development areas MR-1 through MR-4.
b. The seeding method for all areas shown in Figure 9 is hydroseeding, while in the
test, broadcast seeding is specified.
c. Figure 9, selected native plantings of trees and shrubs are specified in the
Reclamation Slope area, presumably either container stock or transplants from
the site. No mention is made in the text of planning stock or methods of planting
such, except a reference to "selected plants" being salvaged for later replanting.
d. There is no indication of which seeding and planting methods are to be used and
where, and the numbers, species, etc. of planting stock to be installed. This
information must be depicted on a site map.
RESPONSE:
a. Please see Figure 11 in the Amended Reclamation Plan for a graphic that shows
which treatments besides hydro seeding will be applied to the future development
areas MR-l through MR-4.
b. Hydroseeding will be used on site in flat and slope areas and broadcast seeding
will be used in disturbed areas.
c. Please see Tables 5, 6 and 7 in the Amended Reclamation Plan for lists of species
to be planted onsite. Please see page 28 of the appended HMMP for more
detailed information about revegetation efforts.
d. Please see Tables 5, 6 and 7 in the Amended Reclamation Plan for plant species
and numbers to be planted onsite. Please see Figure 11 in the Amended
Reclamation Plan for location, numbers and species of planting stock to be
installed onsite. Please also see page 42, Section C, Subsection 13.0
(Revegetation) of the Amended Reclamation Plan for more details.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PACe 41
~
OF So
COMMENT: It is not clear if the proposed species provided in Table 4 occur on site. A
species list for the site should be provided as part of the description of the environmental
setting. Only species that occur in the area should be used in the revegetation effort.
We recommend that site-specific or locally collected seed be used. Locally collected
seeds are better adapted to the specific climate, aspect, soil type and hydrologic regime
of the site. These adaptations will make the plants more competitive an better suited for
establishments and survival. A local source is defined as being as close to the same
geographic location or watershed, elevation, aspect, an soil type as the project site.
RESPONSE: The tables shown within this amended reclamation text and within the
HMMP reflect the plant and seed species/types that are preferred for this area by S&S
Seeds and Tree Of Life Nurseries (for native revegetation planting).
Table 4 from the originally submitted Reclamation Plan has been deleted and that
particular table is not included in the Amended Reclamation Plan. Please see Appendix
H of the Amended Reclamation Plan for a flora and fauna. Please refer to the Biological
Resources Assessment for a complete description of flora and fauna species found onsite,
including Sensitive Biological Resources. Please also refer to page 6, 3rd paragraph, of
amended reclamation plan for a description of species found onsite.
COMMENT: The use of native shrub species in the proposed seed mix is commended,
however, some changes are recommended in order to improve the chances of successful
revegetation.
a. The following shrub species are better planted from container stock and protected
from herbivores until established: manzanita, ceanothus, toyon, and holly-leaved
cherry.
b. The scrub oak should be planted from acorns
c. Pursuant to CCR 3705(l) protection from predation must be provided. Wire or
plastic cages are commonly used to deter mammal browse.
d. The species list does not include any grasses or herbaceous perennials. Grasses
and herbaceous perennials are easy to establish from seed and can be useful in
preventing erosion, preventing weed invasion, and blending the site with the
surrounding environment during the period leading up to the eventual de
elopement oj mature chaparral habitat.
RESPONSE:
a. Please refer to Section 13.0 (revegetation), specifically Table 7 of the Amended
Reclamation Plan for our response.
b. 5 gallon oak trees will be planted instead of acorns.
c. Please refer to the Protection From Mammal Predation section of the Amended
Reclamation Plan (pg 47).
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE 4 ~
~
OF SO
d. Please see HMMP page 31 (the text under Table 6) for a response to the requested
information.
COMMENT: The species that will be used in the "native wildflowers" seed mix for the
areas stated for future development are not specified in the reclamation plan. Until such
development takes place, the area should be protected from wind and water erosion by
seeding, which should be specified in the plan (CCR 3705(g)). Revegetation success
criteria for these areas will be different form the open space areas.
RESPONSE: Please see Section C, Subsection 13.0, Revegetation. Please also see
Tables 4 and 6 in the Amended Reclamation Plan.
COMMENT: CCR 3705(k) requires that noxious weeds be managed. The reclamation
provides a threshold of not more than 20 percent of ground cover of weed species. We
highly recommend that pampas grass and tree tobacco be completely eliminated from the
site. These species are highly invasive and could ultimately cost the operator more to
control.
RESPONSE: The response can be found in Section C, Subsection 13.0, Revegetation,
(under Weed Control).
COMMENT: CCR 3705(m) requires that vegetation sampling methods used in
monitoring be laid out in the (reclamation) plan. Sample sizes should be sufficient to
achieve an 80 percent confidence level in the mean cover and density measurements.
Such standard statistical measures are available in the literature for example in CD.
Bonham 1988, "Measurements for Terrestrial Vegetation." The monitoring methods,
duration and frequency used should be included in the reclamation plan.
RESPONSE: Please refer to the "Success Criteria", Section 13.0, page 48, within the
Amended Reclamation plan.
COMMENT: The reclamation plan includes success criteria for site revegetation:
however, several items must be clarified to make these criteria valid.
a. The open space area and the commercial/industrial area should have different
success criteria since different seed mixes are being used.
b. The criterion for density should include a unit area. For example, the criterion
should be stated "a minimum of8 out of the 16 perennial shrub species...per 1m x
100 meter plot. The unit area or size of the plot should be the same size that was
used in the baseline survey.
c. There is no criterion for density. Density, the number of plants per unit area, must
be specified.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PACE L. \
~
OF .sa
RESPONSE:
a. Please refer to the "Success Criteria" section within the Amended Reclamation
plan.
b. Our success criteria for site revegetation "density" is based on a 66 foot by 66
foot unit area or size. Please see success criteria section of the Amended
Reclamation Plan for more information.
c. The number of plants/density per the 66 foot by 66 foot revegetation area are
shown on Figure 11- Reclamation/Mitigation Landscape Plan.
COMMENT: Table 3 states that the fifth year will be the final year of monitoring.
Monitoring must continue until success criteria are achieved. In five years, the
vegetation may not be sufficiently established to meet the success criteria. We
recommend that the reclamation plan state that the vegetation monitoring will be
conducted until success criteria have been met for a minimum of two years without
human intervention.
RESPONSE: Please see Section C, Subsection 2.0 (Post Mining Reclamation Phasing
Schedule)
COMMENT: OMR requests clarification of the number listed as "2%" for the
Overburden (in cubic yards) in the Primary Reclamation Activities section under the
grading and contouring of slopes task.
RESPONSE: Please see pages 20, first paragraph under Mine Operations, and page 29,
Section 9.0, Mine Waste (last paragraph) of the Amended Reclamation Plan for reference
to "overburden". Also, please see Appendix D for a definition of overburden. Please
note that the "2%" is an estimated number; an exact quantity of overburden in cubic
yards will be determined at the time of mining and reclamation.
COMMENT: In accordance with CCR Title 14, Section 3805, please ensure these
comments are addressed prior to acceptance of the financial assurance amount. Any
changes in the revised reclamation plan should also be itemized in the Cost Estimate. If
you have any questions regarding the cost estimates or associated references, please
contact Greg Marcuis at (916) 323-9227.
RESPONSE: So noted. Thank you very much for your assistance.
Sincerely,
~
Kirt A. Coury
Planning Consultant
ACENDA ITEM NO.
PACE SO OF So
~
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
TO:
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE:
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PREPARED BY:
MATTHEW C. HARRIS, SENIOR PLANNER
PROJECT TITLE:
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02 &
TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM TRACT MAP NO.
34864 "CANYON ESTATES PROFESSIONAL
OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX"
APPLICANT:
ARCHITECTURAL TEAM THREE (ATTN: LON
BIKE), 23905 CLINTON KEITH ROAD, SUITE 114,
WILDOMAR CA 92595.
OWNER:
CANYON PLAZA PARTNERS LLC. (ATTN:
BRETT KESHTKAR)
PROJECT REQUEST
The applicant is requesting Design Review consideration for the design and
construction of a two-story 14,500 square-foot professional office building and an
associated Tentative Tract Map for Condominium purposes on a .69 acre vacant site
within the Neighborhood Commercial (C-l/SP) zoning district of the Canyon Creek
"Summerhill" Specific Plan. Review is pursuant to the Canyon Creek Specific Plan
and Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code LEMC.
PROJECT LOCATION
The project site is located on the south side of Canyon Estates Drive and west of
Summerhill Drive, Assessor Parcel Number 363-670-009.
AGENDA ITEM 3>
PAGE l OF 1:L2
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
BACKGROUND
The subject property, which consists of a previously graded and improved vacant pad,
is located within the Neighborhood Commercial (C-l/SP) zoning district of the
Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan. Since project submittal, staffhas worked
successfully with the applicant to achieve additional decorative elements and materials
on the building, an entry courtyard effect through decorative paving improvements and
the incorporation of additional planting along the building frontage.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
EXISTING ZONING GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE
Proj ect Vacant C-l/SP
Site Neighborhood Canyon Creek
Commercial "Summerhill"
Specific Plan Specific Plan
North Commercial Bank C-l/SP Canyon Creek
Neighborhood "Summerhill"
Commercial Specific Plan
Soecific Plan
South Vacant C-l/SP Canyon Creek
Neighborhood "Summerhill"
Commercial Specific Plan
Specific Plan
East Future Gas C-l/SP Canyon Creek
Station/Car Wash Neighborhood "Summerhill"
Commercial Specific Plan
Soecific Plan
West Future HoteVMedical C-l/SP Canyon Creek
Office Neighborhood "Summerhill"
Commercial Specific Plan
Specific Plan
AGENDA ITEM ~
PAGE~OF 45
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project site is located within the Neighborhood Commercial (C-l/SP) zoning
district of the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan. Section 020.B. of the
Specific Plan allows professional offices as permitted uses.
Siting
The applicant is proposing to construct a two-story professional office building
consisting of fourteen (14) separate office units. The units are to be owned separately
as office condominiums. The site has been previously graded and supplied with
necessary improvements and utilities. The total footprint of the building is 7,250
square-feet and will cover approximately twenty-four percent (24%) of the site.
Moreover, a floor area ratio (FAR) of thirty- five percent (35%) is proposed onsite. The
remainder of the property will consist of onsite parking facilities and landscaping.
Circulation and Parkinf! Svace Lavout
Two access points shall be provided off the existing private loop road which connects
to Canyon Estates Drive. Parking will be provided on the front side ofthe building and
is accessed via two-way drive aisles. One of the drive aisles crosses the entire building
frontage while the other drive aisle currently exists and will be shared with the
Washington Mutual parking lot directly adjacent and to the north. An onsite trash
enclosure and loading space has been provided at the northwest comer of the parking
lot.
Architecture
The architectural style of the proposed office building is "Mediterranean" in
accordance with the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan Architectural Design
Guidelines. The front building elevation has been sufficiently articulated with a six-
foot deep colonnade and decorative arches that covers the entry doors into the office
units on the first floor. Second floor units are accessed from an uncovered walkway
served by either a stairway at the ends of the building or an elevator at the center. In
addition, arched tower elements are achieved at both the center and ends of the
building which project (2) two additional feet off the building facade and serve to
AGENDA ITEM 3
PAGE~OF~
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
break-up the remainder of the roofline which is composed of parapet walls with a
decorative cornice. The rear building elevation, which is visible from the adjacent loop
road, has been articulated with two four-foot deep projections and decorative wood
trellis elements on the ground floor. An arched tower element has been achieved at the
center of the elevation to break-up the roofline. The side building elevations are also
visible from the adjacent loop road, and have a variety of roof lines and decorative
column elements to achieve interest.
Architectural elements and building materials have been incorporated that further
enhance the Mediterranean building style including a decorative stone veneer on
column bases, wrought iron accents, projecting stucco banding and decorative light
fixtures. Moreover, enhanced paving treatments will be utilized at driveway entrances,
at the front of the building and within the adjacent accessible parking spaces to achieve
a courtyard effect.
Landscaving
The applicant is proposing to develop the site with 5,074 square feet of landscaping
which constitutes seventeen percent (17%) of the site. A minimum of ten percent
(10%) of the site is required to be landscaped. The proposed tree palette includes the
use of Queen Palms at the side building elevations and parking area. The height of the
Queen Palms planted adjacent to side building elevations has been increased to
approximately fifteen feet (15') as a condition of approval in order to provide
immediate softening of the elevations. In addition, thirty-six inch (36") box Italian
Cypress trees will be planted along the rear elevation. A variety of foundation and
parking area plantings will be utilized including but not limited to Day Lily, Mock
Orange, Photina and Texas Privit. All Shrubs will be a minimum five gallon container
size. In order to further soften the front building elevation, planter pockets have been
added along the colonnade wall allowing for Red Bougainvillea to be planted and
climb on the building.
Colors and Materials
The applicant is proposing four (4) different colors on the building. The architectural
design will be further enhanced and the appearance of additional offsets and depth will
be achieved with the chosen color scheme. The contrasting colors are complimentary
and have been chosen to enhance architectural elements within the project. The
AGENDA ITEM '3
PAGE~OF~S
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
proposed green glass windows will further serve to compliment the building color
scheme.
Tentative Condominium Map
The applicant requests approval to establish a proposed office condominium. The
condominium concept would allow the developer the ability to offer individual office
units for sale within the building while sharing common interest, ownership and
maintenance responsibilities within the common areas.
ANAL YSIS
Siting
The proposed site plan meets all applicable development standards and criteria outlined
in the Neighborhood Commercial (C-l/SP) zoning district of the Canyon Creek
((Summerhill" Specific Plan and the Non-Residential development standards outlined
in Chapter 17.38 of the LEMC. Moreover, the project complies with the onsite parking
standards listed in Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements of the LEMC). Pursuant to
the C-l/SP zone, the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) allowed is forty percent
(40%). The applicant is only proposing a thirty-five percent (35%) FAR, well below
the maximum allowed. Additionally, the project siting complies with all perimeter
setbacks.
Circulation and Parkin$! SlJace Lavout
The circulation and parking space layout meets the requirements set forth in Chapter
17.66 (Parking Requirements of the LEMC) including the recently increased 26-foot
wide drive aisle requirement. Additionally, adequate turning radii have been provided
for emergency vehicles, trash and delivery trucks. A reciprocal access agreement will
be required between the project site and the Washington Mutual site to the north. Staff
has determined that fifty-eight (58) parking spaces are required onsite. Fifty-eight (58)
spaces have been provided including six (6) accessible parking spaces.
Architecture
The Mediterranean architectural design of the office building complies with the
AGENDA ITEM ')
PAGE~OF~
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
Architectural Design Guidelines listed in the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific
Plan. Additionally, the architecture of the building has been designed to achieve
harmony and compatibility with surrounding residential, commercial and office
buildings in the vicinity ofthe project site. Correspondingly, the applicant has provided
a variety of building design features and forms by employing treatments, such as
articulated planes along the exterior walls, and a variety of rooflines which will create
depth and shadow. Moreover, the maximum height of the building complies with the
height requirement specified in the C-l/SP zoning district (35-feet).
Landscaping
The landscape design for the project site complies with the requirements set forth
within Section 070 of the Neighborhood Commercial (C-l/SP) zoning district. The
proposed landscaping improvements serve to enhance the building design and soften
portions of building elevations, as well as compliment surrounding properties.
Colors and Materials
The colors and materials proposed for this project meet the intent of the Design
Guidelines of the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan, in that the colors and
materials proposed, will serve to produce diversity and enhance the architectural
effects. Additionally, the colors and materials proposed will assist in blending the
architecture into the existing landscape.
Tentative Condominium Map
The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) required in association with the
map will be recorded against the project as a condition of approval. In addition, an
owners association will be empowered to administer and enforce the various elements
of the CC&R's. To accomplish this, the office owner's association will establish
monthly fees that cover aspects such as landscape maintenance, parking lot
maintenance and utility infrastructure improvements. The project has also been
conditioned to require that the applicant submit a copy of the proposed CC&R's to the
Planning Division for review and approval prior to recordation. Moreover, staff has
added a condition of approval which will require that the association be established
prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first office unit.
n
AGENDA ITEM .J
PAGE~OF U t""
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Staff has determined that the potential environmental impacts associated with the
construction of the office facility have all been previously addressed in the Mitigated
Negative Declaration (MND) for the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan
Amendment No.1. In addition, 1) No substantial project changes are proposed that
would require major revisions to the MND; 2) No substantial changes will occur with
respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken and 3) No new
information of substantial importance has been identified since the previous MND was
certified. Therefore, no subsequent environmental analysis is necessary pursuant to
Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt; Resolution No. 2006-_
recommending City Council adoption of findings of consistency with the Multi-
Species Habitat Conservation Plan, Resolution No. 2006-_ recommending to the City
Council approval of Commercial Design Review No. 2006-02 and Resolution No.
2006-_ recommending to the City Council approval of Tentative Condominium Tract
Map No. 34864 based on the following Findings, Exhibits "A" thru "K" and the
proposed Conditions of Approval.
PREPARED BY:
MATTHEW C. HARRIS, SENIOR PLANNER
APPROVED BY:
Rolfe M. Preisendanz,
Director of Community Development
ATTACHMENTS:
1. LOCATION MAP
2. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIONS
3. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
AGENDA ITEM '3
PAGEloF ~S
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
4. EXHIBITS
. REDUCTIONS (8 ~ xII)
Exhibit A Site Plan
Exhibit B Site Details
Exhibit C Site Details
Exhibit D 1 st Floor Plan
Exhibit E 2nd Floor Plan
Exhibit F Building Elevations
Exhibit G Roof Plan
Exhibit H Building Cross-Sections
Exhibit I Grading Plan
Exhibit J Landscaping Plan
Exhibit K Tentative Condominium Map
· FULL SIZE PLAN SET
AGENDA ITEM ')
PAGE~OF~
VICINITY MAP
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
TENTATIVE CONDO TRACT MAP NO. 34864
I
0:::
UJ
::2:
::2:
:J
en
ACENOA 'TEM NO. '3
PAGe ~ OF 45
-
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO
THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF FINDINGS THAT THE
PROJECT KNOWN AS CANYON CREEK PROFESSIONAL
OFFICE BUILDING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE MULTI-SPECIES
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP)
WHEREAS, Architectural Team Three, c/o Lon Bike, has submitted an
application for Design Review and Tentative Condominium Map approval for the
Canyon Creek Professional Office Building located on the south side of Canyon
Estates Drive and west of Summerhill Drive - APN 363-670-009 (the "Project");
and
WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that all discretionary
projects within an MSHCP criteria cell undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition
Process ("LEAP") and Joint Project Review ("JPR") to analyze the scope of the
proposed development and establish a building envelope that is consistent with the
MSHCP criteria; and
WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP further requires that the City of
Lake Elsinore adopt consistency findings demonstrating that the proposed
discretionary entitlement complies with the MSCHP cell criteria, and the MSCHP
goals and objectives; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.82 and
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter 16, requests for design review
consideration and tentative condominium map review, respectively, are
discretionary actions to be considered, reviewed, and approved, conditionally
approved or denied by the Lake Elsinore City Council; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal.
Pub. Res. Code ~~ 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R.
~~ 15000 et seq.), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and
paperwork associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously
prepared environmental documents when those previously prepared documents
adequately address the potential impacts of the proposed Project (CEQA
Guidelines Section 15006); and
ACEN[)A ITEM NO. 3
Pl~oe . '10 OF ._'~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE20F5
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes the standard to be
used when determining whether subsequent environmental documentation is
necessary and says that when an environmental document has already been
adopted for a project, no subsequent environmental documentation is needed for
subsequent entitlements which comprise the whole of the action unless substantial
changes or new information are presented by the project; and
WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved and adopted
for the Summerhill Specific Plan and evaluated environmental impacts that would
result from maximum build-out of the specific plan; and
WHEREAS, office condominium uses are consistent with the Summerhill
Specific Plan and any environmental impacts that might result from development
of the Project have been adequately analyzed under the previous Mitigated
Negative Declaration and given that the Project does not present substantial
changes or new information regarding environmental impacts, no additional
environmental documentation is necessary; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this
item on October 3, 2006.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Project's
consistency with the MSHCP prior to recommending that the City Council adopt
Findings of Consistency with the MSHCP.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning laws, the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, and the MSHCP, the Planning Commission makes
the following MSHCP Consistency Findings:
MSHCP CONSISTENCY FINDINGS
1. The Project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City
must make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval.
ACENOA ITEM NO.
PAGE \ \ OF
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE30F5
Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Resolution, the Project is required to be
reviewed for MSHCP consistency, including consistency with other "Plan
Wide Requirements." The Project site lies within Criteria Cell #4647.
However, based upon a verbal "common law vested rights agreement"
between the City and the previous landowner, the site was exempted from
the MSHCP. This agreement was the result of the previous landowner's
extensive costs associated with infrastructure and road construction in that
area prior to the City's involvement in the MSHCP. Based upon the site
reconnaissance survey there are no issues regarding consistency with the
MSCHP's other "Plan Wide Requirements." The only requirements
potentially applicable to the Project were the Protection of Species
Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines
(MSHCP, ~ 6.1.2) and payment of the MSHCP Local Development
Mitigation Fee (MSHCP Ordinance, ~ 4). The Project site has already been
graded as approved under the previous agreement and no habitat is present
on site, including riparian/riverine areas or vernal pools.
2. The Project is subject to the City's LEAP and the County's Joint Project
Review processes.
As stated above, the Project is exempt from the MSHCP by virtue of a
common law vested rights agreement between the previous landowner and
the City. Therefore, the Project was not processed through a Joint Project
Review.
3. The Project is consistent with the RiparianlRiverine Areas and Vernal Pools
Guidelines.
The Project is exempt from the requirements of the MSHCP based upon a
common law vested right. The site reconnaissance survey revealed that no
riparian, riverine, vernal pool/fairy shrimp habitat or other aquatic
resources exist on the site. As such, the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal
Pool Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP are not
applicable.
4. The Project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant
Species Guidelines.
The Project is exempt from the requirements of the MSHCP based upon a
common law vested right. Further, the site does not fall within any Narrow
Endemic Plant Species Survey Areas. Neither a habitat assessment nor
ACENOA ITEM NO. '3
PACE \ ~ OF'--\. 5
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE 4 OF 5
further focused surveys are required for the Project. Therefore, Protection
of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.1.3 of
the MSHCP are not applicable to the Project.
5. The Project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures.
The Project is exempt from the requirements of the MSHCP based upon a
common law vested right. Further, the MSHCP only requires additional
surveys for certain species if the Project is located in Criteria Area Species
Survey Areas, Amphibian Species Survey Areas, Burrowing Owl Survey
Areas, and Mammal Species Survey Areas of the MSHCP. The Project site
is not located within any of the Critical Species Survey Areas. Therefore,
the provisions of MSCHP Section 6.3.2 are not applicable.
6. The Project is consistent with the UrbanlWildlands Interface Guidelines.
The Project is exempt from the requirements of the MSHCP based upon a
common law vested right. The Project site is not within or adjacent to any
MSHCP criteria or conservation areas. Therefore, the Urban/Wildlands
Interface Guidelines of MSHCP Section 6.1.4 are not applicable. No
additional mitigation measures or conditions of approval are required.
7. The Project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
The Project is exempt from the requirements of the MSHCP based upon a
common law vested right. The entire Project site has been rough-graded.
There are no resources located on the Project site requiring mapping as set
forth in MSCHP Section 6.3.1.
8. The Project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines.
The Project is exempt from the requirements of the MSHCP based upon a
common law vested right. Further, the Project site is not within or adjacent
to any MSHCP criteria or conservation areas. Therefore, the Fuels
Management Guidelines of MSHCP Section 6.4 are not applicable. No
additional mitigation measures or conditions or approval are required.
9. The Project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local
Development Mitigation Fee.
As a condition of approval, the Project will be required to pay the City's
MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee at the time of issuance of
building permits.
ACENDA ITEM NO. ')
PAGE \ ') OF ~ S
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE50F5
10.The Project is consistent with the MSHCP.
As stated in Finding No. 1 above, the Project is exempt from the
requirements of the MSHCP based upon a ((common law vested rights
agreement" between the City and the previous landowner.
SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of October, 2006,
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Rolfe M. Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
PACE \ ~ OF 4 ~
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL
OF COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02 FOR THE
CANYON CREEK PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING
WHEREAS, Lon Bike, Architectural Team Three, has initiated proceedings
for Commercial Design Review No. 2006-02 for the design and construction of a
two-story professional office building with related improvements located within
the Canyon Creek Summerhill Specific Plan on the south side of Canyon Estates
Drive and west of Summerhill Drive - APN 363-670-009 (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has
been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City
Council for Design Reviews; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this
item on October 3, 2006.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Project prior to
making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve Commercial
Design Review No. 2006-02.
SECTION 2. That pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(Cal. Pub. Res. Code SS 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14
C.C.R. 99 15000 et seq.), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay
and paperwork associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously
prepared environmental documents when those previously prepared documents
adequately address the potential impacts of the proposed Project (CEQA
Guidelines Section 15006).
And, that CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes the standard to be
used when determining whether subsequent environmental documentation is
necessary. Section 15162 says that when an environmental document has already
AGENDA ITEM i'JO,____.. '3 .
PAOr: \ 5 . CF_.~5
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -
PAGE20F4
been adopted for a project, no subsequent environmental documentation is needed
for subsequent entitlements which comprise the whole of the action unless
substantial changes or new information are presented by the project.
The Planning Commission hereby finds that a Mitigated Negative
Declaration was approved and adopted for the Summerhill Specific Plan and
evaluated environmental impacts that would result from maximum build-out of the
specific plan. Office condominium uses are consistent with the Summerhill
Specific Plan and any environmental impacts that might result from development
of the Project have been adequately analyzed under the previous Mitigated
Negative Declaration and given that the Project does not present substantial
changes or new information regarding environmental impacts, no additional
environmental documentation is necessary.
SECTION 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law and
the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following
findings for the approval of the Commercial Design Review No. 2006-02:
1. The Project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the
General Plan, Specific Plan and the Zoning District in which the Project is
located.
The Project complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and,
Canyon Creek ((Summerhill" Specific Plan in that the approval of this
professional office building will assist in the creation of additional job
opportunities within the community. Moreover, the Project will assist in
achieving the development of a well-balanced and functional mix of
residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and
institutional land uses as well as encouraging commercial land uses to
diversify Lake Elsinore's economic base.
2. The Project complies with the design directives contained in the Canyon
Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan, Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
The Project is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that
the professional office building has been designed in consideration of the
size and shape of the property. Sufficient setbacks and onsite landscaping
have been provided thereby creating interest and varying vistas as a person
moves along the street. In addition, safe and efficient circulation has been
achieved onsite. Further, the Project will complement the quality of existing
ACENDA ITEM NO. ')
PACE_UL-OF ~S
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -
PAGE30F4
development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship
between the proposed development and existing projects in that the
applicant is providing a "Mediterranean" architectural design with various
elements which serve to enhance the building. Moreover, a variety of
materials and colors are proposed including decorative wrought iron
accents, decorative light fixtures and earth tone colors that serve to blend
with surrounding developments and demonstrate a concern for quality and
originality.
3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the Project is not anticipated
to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
The Project, as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City divisions,
departments and agencies, will not have a significant effect on the
environment. The potential impacts associated with the Project do not result
in substantial change to the previously certified Canyon Creek
"Summerhill" Specific Plan Mitigated Negative Declaration. Therefore, no
additional environmental review is necessary for the proposed Project
pursuant to Section 15162.
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning
Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions,
have been incorporated into the approval of the Project to ensure
development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter
17.82.
Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the
Project has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning
Commission on October 3, 2006.
SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAl:,E \ "
3
OF 4S
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -
PAGE40F4
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of October 2006, by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
ATTEST:
Rolfe M. Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
ACENDA ITEM NO. '3>
PAGE ''=b OF ~ S
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 34864 FOR CANYON
CREEK PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING
WHEREAS, Architectural Team Three, c/o Lon Bike, has filed an
application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting the approval of Tentative
Condominium Tract Map No. 34864 for the establishment of a office
condominium building known as the Canyon Creek Professional Office Building
to be located south of Canyon Estates Drive and west of Summerhill Drive - APN
363-670-009 (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has
been delegated with the responsibility of recommending approval of Tentative
Condominium Maps for residential projects to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this
item on October 3, 2006.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Project and has
found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the
Project is consistent with Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code (LEMC), and Section(s) 66424 and 66427 of the California
Government Code.
SECTION 2. That pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(Cal. Pub. Res. Code 99 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14
C.C.R. 99 15000 et seq.), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay
and paperwork associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously
prepared environmental documents when those previously prepared documents
adequately address the potential impacts of the proposed Project (CEQA
Guidelines Section 15006).
N:lENOA ITEM NO.
PACE1~
3
OF ~~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE20F3
And, that CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes the standard to be
used when determining whether subsequent environmental documentation is
necessary. Section 15162 says that when an environmental document has already
been adopted for a project, no subsequent environmental documentation is needed
for subsequent entitlements which comprise the whole of the action unless
substantial changes or new information are presented by the project.
The Planning Commission hereby finds that a Mitigated Negative
Declaration was approved and adopted for the Summerhill Specific Plan and
evaluated environmental impacts that would result from maximum build-out of the
specific plan. Office condominium uses are consistent with the Summerhill
Specific Plan and any environmental impacts that might result from development
of the Project have been adequately analyzed under the previous Mitigated
Negative Declaration and given that the Project does not present substantial
changes or new information regarding environmental impacts, no additional
environmental documentation is necessary.
SECTION 3. That in accordance with Government Code Sections 66424
and 66427 and LEMC Title 16 "Subdivisions," the Planning Commission makes
the following findings for the approval of the Tentative Condominium Map 34864:
1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and
improvement, is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision
is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs
specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5).
The Project, as designed, assists in achieving the development of a well-
balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open
space, recreational and institutional land uses (GOAL 1.0, Land Use
Element) as well as provides decent business opportunities and a satisfying
office environment.
2. The effects that this Project is likely to have upon the economic needs of the
region, the business requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and
environmental resources have been considered and balanced.
The additional office spaces provided by the Project will serve to enhance
and improve the economic needs of the region and the business needs of the
Lake Elsinore community by providing additional office space opportunities
for local residents and businesses.
ACENiDA ITEM NO._ 3
PAGE ~O OF ~ S
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE30F3
3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the Project is not anticipated
to result in any significant environmental impact.
The project has been adequately conditioned by all applicable departments
and agencies and will not result in any significant environmental impacts.
SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of October, 2006,
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
ATTEST:
Rolfe Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
ACENDA ITEM NO. 3
PAGS d.\ OF 45
-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
Page 1 of 13
PLANNING
General Conditions:
1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City),
indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Official, Officers, Employees,
and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its
Official, Officers, Employees, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or
annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or
legislative body concerning the commercial project, which action is
bought within the time period provided for in California Government
Code Sections 65009 and/or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code
Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any such
claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully with
the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any such
claim, or proceeding, the Applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to
defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City.
2. Applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures associated with the
Environmental Impact Report for the Canyon Creek Specific Plan and
Mitigated Negative Declaration for Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific
Plan Amendment No. 1 as applicable.
3. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check
or money order made payable to the Riverside County Clerk in the
amount of $1,314.00 to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination. Said filing fee shall be provided to the City within 48
hours of project approval.
4. Applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the
project site identifying the approved days and hours of construction
activity and a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be
lodged with the City of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division at
(951) 674-3124.
Agenda ':>
Page~of~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
Page 2 of 13
Tentative Condominium Tract Map No. 34864
5. Tentative Condominium Tract Map No. 34864 will expire two (2) years
from date of approval unless within that period of time the CC&R's and
an appropriate instrument has been filed and recorded with the County
Recorder, or an extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore
City Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act.
6. The Tentative Condominium Tract Map shall comply with the State of
California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply with all applicable
requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 16 unless
modified by approved Conditions of Approval.
7. Prior to the first certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall prepare and
record CC&R's against the office condominium complex. The CC&R's
shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development
Director or Designee and the City Attorney. The CC&R's shall include
methods of maintaining common areas, parking and drive aisle areas,
landscaped areas including parkways, and methods for common
maintenance of all underground, and above ground utility infrastructure
improvements necessary to support the complex. In addition, the
CC&R's shall stipulate that employees of office suites are prohibited
from parking within the row of onsite parking spaces located directly
adjacent to the building.
8. No unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation,
association, property owner's group or similar entity has been formed
with the right to financially assess all properties individually owned or
jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common
areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power
to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to
control, and duty to maintain, all said mutually available features of the
development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which
shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or office
units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of
maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit
enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of
Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this
Agenda ')
page~Of~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
Page 3 of 13
requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any
such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for
public purposes.
9. Provisions to restrict parking upon other than approved and developed
parking spaces shall be written into the covenants, conditions and
restrictions for each project.
10. Membership in the Office Owner's Association shall be mandatory for
each buyer and any successive buyer.
11. Reciprocal covenants, conditions, and restrictions and reciprocal
maintenance agreements shall be established which will cause a merging
of all development phases as they are completed, and embody one (1)
office owner's association with common area for the total development
of the subject project.
12. In the event the association or other legally responsible person(s) fail to
maintain said common area in such a manner as to cause same to
constitute a public nuisance, said City may, upon proper notice and
hearing, institute summary abatement procedures and impose a lien for
the costs of such abatement upon said common area, individual units or
whole thereof as provided by law.
13. Each office unit owner shall have full access to commonly owned areas,
facilities and utilities.
Commercial Design Review No. 2006-02
14. Approval for Commercial Design Review No. 2006-02 will lapse and be
void unless building permits are issued within one (1) year following the
date of approval.
15. Any alteration or expansion of a project for which there has been a
"Design Review" approval as well as all applications for modification or
other change in the conditions of approval of a "Design Review" shall be
reviewed according to the provisions of Chapter 17.82 in a similar
manner as a new application.
Agenda ')
page~Of~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
Page 4 of 13
16. No structure which has received a "Design Review" or "Minor Design
Review" approval shall be occupied or used in any manner or receive a
Certificate of Occupancy until the Director of Community Development
has determined that all Conditions of Approval have been complied with.
17. The property owners of APN 363-670-009 (Office Condominium
Property) and the property owners of APN 363-670-001 (Property
Adjacent and to the North) shall negotiate and record a Reciprocal
Access and parking Agreement wherein both property owners agree to
allow the motoring public to travel and park on either property in order to
access the other property. The agreement shall be reviewed and approved
by the Director of Community Development and the City Attorney prior
to recordation.
18. Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on page one of building
plans submitted to the Building Division Plan Check. All Conditions of
Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
and release of utilities.
19. All site improvements approved with this request shall be constructed as
indicated on the approved site plan and elevations. Revisions to approved
site plans or building elevations shall be subject to the review of the
Community Development Director.
20. Plan Check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by
Conditions of Approval, or the Planning Commission/City Council
through subsequent action.
21. All roof mounted or ground support air conditioning units or other
mechanical equipment incidental to development shall be architecturally
screened or shielded by landscaping so that they are not visible from
neighboring property or public streets. Any material covering the roof
equipment shall match the primary wall color.
22. All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site so as
not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets. All light
fixtures shall compliment the architectural style of the building.
Agenda ~
Page as of ~
CONDITIONS OF APPROV AI..
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
Page 5 of 13
23. Applicant shall comply with all ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act)
requirements.
24. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standards as approved by
the Community Development Director or Designee prior to issuance of
Certificate of Occupancy.
25. No exterior roof ladders shall be permitted.
26. All exterior downspouts shall be concealed within the building.
27. The Planning Division shall approve the location of any construction
trailers utilized during construction. All construction trailers shall require
a cash bond processed through the Planning Division.
28. Materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be
used unless modified by the Director of Community Development or
designee. The colors and materials include the following:
Field Color
Dunn Edwards DE 127 "Tan"
Field Color
Dunn Edwards DE 130 "Light Tan"
Field Color
Dunn Edwards DE 136 "Medium Tan"
Accent Color
Dunn Edwards "Forest Green"
Roofing
U.S. Tiles, El Camino Blend
Storefront
To Match PPG Green Glass
29. Parking stalls shall be double-striped with four-inch (4") lines two feet
(2') apart.
30. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have a
permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed and
approved by the Planning Division.
31. On,:,site surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks.
Agenda 3
Page ~ b of J!5.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
Page 6 of 13
Prior to Issuance of Building/Grading Permit:
32. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permits, the applicant
shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions" form and
shall return the executed original to the Planning Division for inclusion in
the case records.
33. Three (3) sets of the Final Landscaping/Irrigation Detail Plan shall be
submitted, reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect
Consultant and the Community Development Director or designee, prior
to issuance of building permit. A Landscape Plan Check & Inspection
Fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval.
a. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler
system with 100% plant and grass coverage using a combination of
drip and conventional irrigation methods.
b. All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six
inch (6") high and six inch (6") wide concrete curb.
c. Plantings within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be
no higher than thirty-six inches (36").
d. Any transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be
indicated on landscape plan and screened as part of the landscaping
plan.
e. Shrubs and vines shall be planted around the onsite trash enclosure
to soften the structure. The landscape and irrigation plan shall be
revised accordingly.
f. Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details.
g. The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and
trees and meet all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape
Guidelines. Special attention to the use of Xeriscape or drought
resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to be
used to prevent excessive watering. Thirty percent (30%) of shrubs
required on slopes shall be five-gallon container size.
Agenda )
Page ~lof~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIE W NO. 2006-02
Page 7 of 13
h. All landscape improvements shall be bonded 100% for material
and labor for two years from installation sign-off by the City.
Release of the landscaping bond shall be requested by the applicant
at the end of the required two years with approval/acceptance by
the Landscape Consultant and Community Development Director
or Designee.
1. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within affected
portion of any phase at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is
requested for any building. Final landscape plan must be consistent
with approved site plan.
J. The Queen Palm trees proposed to be planted adjacent to side
building elevations shall have a minimum of IS-feet of brown
trunk height as measured from the finished grade. Final landscape
plan shall be revised accordingly.
34. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance
that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have
been paid.
35. The architectural site plan shall be revised to eliminate the employee
parking (EP) symbols within the row of nineteen parking spaces within
the interior of the onsite parking lot.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
General Requirements:
36. A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer
shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing
flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City
Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is
not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory
drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading
begins.
37. Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant to provide to the
Agenda )
Page ~ ~ of JiS
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
Page 8 of 13
City a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export
material. Such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the
City Engineer.
38. Applicant shall install signs at the project site indicating the construction
work hours and contact information for the project. Any deviation from
the previously approved working hours shall be approved by the City
Engineer.
39. All grading shall be done under the supervISIOn of a geotechnical
engineer. The engineer shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for
stability and proper erosion control.
40. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work within City
right-of-way.
41. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles,
vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the
property owner or his agent.
42. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the
provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's
agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District.
43. Applicant shall pay all applicable development impact/mitigation fees,
including but not all inclusive: TUMF, MSHCP, Railroad Canyon
Benefit District, TIF and area drainage fees.
44. Ten year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year
storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When
either of these criteria are exceeded, drainage facilities shall be provided.
45. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications
(with tie notes delineated on 8 'li" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the
Engineering Division before final inspection of public works
improvements will be scheduled and approved.
46. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal &
recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for
Agenda 3>
Page ~ G.. of J:lS.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
Page 9 of 13
removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other
rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all
other phases of construction.
47. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by
adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed
to a drainage easement.
48. All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site,
or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City
Engineer.
49. Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the
street curb.
50. Roofs should drain to a landscaped area.
51. All open space, slopes, drainage systems, except for public parks and
schools and flood control district facilities, located outside of the public
right-of-way shall be owned and maintained by property owner's
association.
52. Applicant shall comply with all NPDES requirements in effect; including
the submittal of an Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as
required per the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board.
53. City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water
management and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal
law, these local storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste
into storm drain system or local surface waters. This includes non-storm
water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste
remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should
Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall.
PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain
system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or
waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
Agenda 3
page~of~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
Page 10 of 13
54. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not
required, a site plan that shows proposed project improvements and
drainage patterns shall be submitted so that a cursory drainage and flow
pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins.
55. Submit grading plans with appropriate security, Hydrology and
Hydraulic Reports prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer for approval
by the City Engineer. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or
erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or diversion
of drainage.
56. Provide soils, geology and seismic report. Provide final soils report
showing compliance with recommendations.
57. An Alquis-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any
hidden earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on-site.
58. The applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site
grading and/or drainage acceptance from the adjacent property owners
prior to grading permit issuance.
59. Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading
plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality
and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside
County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan.
60. Applicant shall protect all downstream properties from damages caused
by alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concentrations or diversion of
flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage
facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/or by securing a
drainage easement. A maintenance mechanism shall be in place for any
private drainage facilities constructed on-site or off-site. Any grading or
drainage onto private off site or adjacent property shall require a written
permission to grade and/or a permission to drain letter from the affected
landowner.
61. Applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a Notice of
Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National
Agenda 3
page~of~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
Page 11 of 13
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program with a storm
water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of grading permits.
62. Applicant shall submit a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as
required per the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board.
63. Applicant shall obtain approval from Santa Ana Regional Water Quality
Control Board for their storm water pollution prevention plan including
approval of erosion control for the grading plan prior to issuance of
grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post
construction, which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the
development and including maintenance responsibilities.
64. Reciprocal access (agreement) shall be granted to all parcels within this
site.
65. A revised signing and striping plan for Canyon Estates Drive, from
Summerhill Drive to Ridgecrest Drive shall be submitted for review. The
installation of the revised signing and striping will be the responsibility
of the applicant.
66. The project driveway @ Boulder Vista Drive shall be revised to a right-
in/right-out only with the installation of right-in/out median at the
driveway entrance.
67. All existing and proposed easements and dedications shall be properly
noted in the grading plan.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
68. Relocate the existing street light on Canyon Estates Drive, from
approximately 60 feet east of the project driveway/Boulder Vista Drive to
near the driveway entrance.
69. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of
development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC)
prior to building permit.
70. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the
Agenda 3
page1L1 of ~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
Page 12 of 13
applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have
been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water
service at the location, such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit
this letter prior to applying for a building permit.
71. Pay all and Plan Check fees and Capital Improvement Impact Mitigation
Fees - TUMF, MSHCP, Railroad Canyon Benefit District, TIF and area
drainage fees.
Prior to Occupancy
72. All compaction reports, grade/elevation certifications, monument
certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be
submitted to the Engineering Division.
73. Pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by
the Engineering Division for construction of public works improvements
(LEMCI2.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment
permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy.
74. All traffic signing/striping and access controls for on-site and offsite shall
be completed in accordance with the approved plans to the satisfaction of
the City Traffic Engineer.
75. Water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with
Water District requirements.
76. Proof of acceptance of maintenance responsibility of slopes, open spaces,
and drainage facilities shall be provided.
77. All public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the
approved plans or as conditions of approval of this development to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
78. Developer to pay park fees of $0.1 0 per square foot for all interior
commercial/industrial space (14,500 sq. ft. @$0.10=$1,450).
Agenda ?>
Page '?:> '> of 4: S
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02
Page 13 of 13
79. Developer shall comply with all City Ordinances regarding construction
debris removal and recycling as per Section 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
80. The applicant shall comply with all Riverside County Fire Department
conditions and standards.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
81. ADA Path of Travel to the public right-of-way shall be completed prior
to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
82. Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan,
or Special Use Permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex into the
Mello-Roos Community Facilities District 2006-5 to fund the on-going
operation and maintenance of the new parks, parkways, open space and
public storm drains constructed within the development and federal
NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the
project. Applicant shall make a four thousand two hundred dollar
($4,200) non-refundable deposit to cover the cost of the annexation
process. Contact Dennis Anderson, Harris & Associates at (949) 655-
3900 x334 or danderson@harris-assoc.com.
83. Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan,
or Special Use Permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex into
Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No.1 to offset the annual
negative fiscal impacts of the project on public right-of-way landscaped
areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City and for street
lights in the public right-of-way for which the City will pay for electricity
and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison. Applicant shall
make a four thousand seven hundred dollar ($4,700) non-refundable
deposit to cover the cost of the annexation process. Contact Dennis
Anderson, Harris & Associates at (949) 655-3900 x334 or
danderson@harris-assoc.com.
Agenda .3
Page ,~ of 4$
\ / ~~
-:.%
-c.'
~,
..'
\ I" / II' /
!I', \ .11, / :1' /
'II, Ib' iI!' /
'i \ /
II',
'II,
I I
II'
I,:
!;
~
!I',
',I,
II
;/(€""
/..... ':--!?-')
10/ ~
/ !/~"'~f'
I ~/
I
I
)>
::0
()
:I:
--l
fT1
()
--l
C
:;JJ
)>
r
~
--l
fT1
-u
r
)>
z
~
~
.
~
~ ~)
II'
',I
II!'
'Ii '
hi
m~~
-n ~~I~i
;0
0
<- ~ I~! , I p'lii 'lUlU: -0
fT1 ;0
n ~ ~j )> 11111.. I 0
--l -0 i i ;I! <-
.~ -0 ~PHU fT1
!in r JI n
z I~~nl! --l
-n () IIIII h~
CJ )> 0
;0 Z )>
s:: --l --i
)> :.,Jm lI:.. 1/1 . If: i' . _ 1-'
--i ~nn..~'
CJ
Z
t)
! !PH;P
i IdU11
R 1;11
~ qun
"_ . "in
· - I II
.'.
CIl
'"
"'
'"
..,
~t\~Crgl!. INI@. II
~~@IrU~~@INIt\1!. @1F1r~~[g ~WJ~I!.IQ)~INI@
i
>: f
l
,
! 1I111'111ilillii i
~
o
~
N.W,C, SUMMERHILL DR. I CANYON ESTATES DR,
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
./
//
i
,
,.
,.
,.
,.
,.
,.
,.
,.
1
1
I
i
,
i
/
i
i
i
I
I
I
i
I
I
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
,
i "',
i ,\\
r-.-~~9_~~'
i RIDGE-----
j DRIVE
i~
! / ,.--.-
i
i
i
I(J
!]:>
/<
1_
io
/<
//:;
,/ .i;'
,/r:;;
/0
./S;
/".....;
10"
,.
,.
,.
,.
//
,.
,.
,.
,.
,.
/l""""""" \..,.,
/ """ 6'Q; , ",
, ~ ~ ,
// ~~~~~,;.""',
! / / "'~~~"
"',
II'.
'II,
I I
!
i
i
i
~,
dI,'
",I
~i
!
i
~~
~~
~
':l lit lit ~ ::I ':I ~ := ;: ;; -: ;; ;;. ;: .:: ;;
!HiUllllilllllll! II !i III
!!j!nrl"l !il~lP n '0 ! ,
;I!!lil "! ld!!ij ;! II i!
""'Il'!!' .,1 I' q.! ·
ill!1 Ii; Il I ,! !; I'!
'!~i~ A": 'i 3 ::: ~~ ill~
Ii! :' II i l' i 'I I'
;i: I ~ ~' ;< 'P I; ~~
II:: ' Ii .: t
',::l ~ a:; .. ~
hii ! i
i!: * ~ :
m~ :i
'iI
i
z
o
-i
,.,.,
Vl
DW.II
CUYON PUZA PARTNERS
LLC
if mp~
r J ~g[ ;
~ ti &
, .t .
HtJ
Nae PIIISTLJ DJUn,lUITt 101
C.llLllAD, CA bOOl
Tell710'Ul-ml,.
H
n
~.s
r
J
OF 45
pp- ~
, PAGE
-<
""
,..
V>
OJ:
""'
z
n
r-
o
V>
c
""
""'
."
r-
,..
z
,=
:~ !;
;! h
;~ !i
,---- - -1,------"
I I
~
o
-<
""
,..
V>
OJ:
""'
Z
P
o
V>
c
""
""'
""'
r-
""'
<
,..
-<
o
z
I a !
PI
: 6 ~
. . .
i:!.1='
. , .
it. .
! . ,
, . .
II I; ~
A ~
~
,~~.';:1
...~
~'I~
i ~ ~
i i
~ =
, .
i
V>
;;:j
""'
z
-<
""
,..
z
n
""'
V>
""'
Z
~
."
""'
""
n
,..
V>
-<
n
o
z
n
,.
OJ:
""'
""'
r-
V>
-<
o
"
j 17'ldlolUUI
co <5 :: ;::;
n " " Ui~ IfiJiI (f2) (f2) ."
0 ,.. ,..
z =Q "" ::H "@~ ~ ""
n ""' "" ~ ""
"" z
""' a> z pi; ~"@
-< ""' (f2) ~ ""'
""' ,..
"" V> V>
n "" -< I~i ~F F "@ -<
c ,.. >-
"" ""' r- .. ~@ r-
'" "" r- "18 IfiJiI @ r-
.... ..-...., ~ r- ~p = w; @ V>
I ""' ~~
-< ;1 ""'
-< z
""' @1fiJiI F
"" !!
V> IfiJiI
'i! ! ~~ ~. ,fJ .'~
;1 I ~; .~ i. -'.
II ~3 ill 3 ~i'
~i ! 3 it ~:
~i .1 "
! i !
'" i
r- OJ: " ."
""' >- j >- ItII'''IIIIlSTIU.'''~' ~~
Z ~
OJ: i II 1- 0
-< ;=; :z I-~
." ,.. ~ ""' I z
0 ." .1 -< ~l
r- f V> I , I V>
""' -< I
a> ~ i I -<
,.. r- ~i I ~
~ I :;;2
V> I
V> -< I
-< "" I
"" ." .J
." I
Z i II ~ z I Ii J "~. l
r1 \ ""'
""' i d ~=~ i;
~ i ~ '51 ,i , .
I I ~ mi ~f! !I - .
~ ;;1 '. ,. < iI- -.
h 2~ ~ iii.; ~
~ . , i"
! ' .i "
, 0\ t '"
~
~
o
c:::!:>
! . Illillllr~iii
Ul
;Q
'"
'"
...
.
c:::!:>
~~lrdcn INI@, @
[Fl1ii@1r~$$~@INIDlIb @lrlr~~~ ~mU)ilNl~
OWN..
CANYON PLAZA PARTN!RI
LLC
N.W.C. SUMMERHILL DR. I CANYON ESTATES DR.
LAKE ELSINORE. CALIFORNIA
TA\ZifiiiID
PAGE
2'.00'
Z
0
;:0
-i
I
CJ
~
<
,."
:0;:
1>
-<
~
'"
(/)
o
C
-i
I
CJ
;:0
<
,."
:0;:
1>
-<
'"
:;::
)>
Z
,."
Z
-i
;:0
-<
,OO"9l
t)
,
PIIIII mil !ill
; Ii I, "I' ! Ii I 1111
i: :! I ! ',i I I. ;
P1PPI I ! ! p'
!TI~! H I Ill;
! ,iJ: i ~ j j j'!
! ill! i'" i
~
o
~
Ul
:J:
l'i
l'i
'"
! Mllllllllililliii
:11 ~!;~
,q ,I!I
!" . ..
II I ~ ..
H dli
~!" ~ !
I: I
il~ =
!! I
~ ~
z
o
-i
,."
(/)
'~~~1E1b IM@, e
1Pl~@lFjgflfl~@~AI!. @1F1F~~jg ~l\!J~I!.[QJDIMIfj
CANYON P~:;~. PARTNERS = f.
LLC
.
IJ@
Illllll PllmUf DIl"I,IUI7l10l
N.W.C. SUWWERHILL DR. I UNYON ESTATES DR.
LAKE ELSINORE. CALIFORNIA
AGSm~:rJIM,.N
PAGE
~
:to
:0
n
I
-j
fT1
n
-j
c .!:
:0
:to
r
"
:0
(J)
-j
"
r
0
0
:0
-U
r
:to
Z
,
",
~
t)
~
o
[i@
Itllll --0
iii !
I
I
I
q
I
I
I
I
~
!@
q
~)
I
I
I
I
d
I
I
I
I
I
Dl
I
I
'i@ 6' (
------+==-.--- := O~B*fj
T);---- -:--G
I
I
q
I
I
I
I
I
q
I
I
I
I
q
I
I
I
I
d
I
I
I
I
I
q
I
I
I
I
,
""" '-JD
888
""" ! ,,//
I I I
l I i
t i i
I i I
i i i
i i i
i ! i
~
~
CD
C0
<.n
en
...,
~
~
cO
cD
'"
~
CD
'"
<.n
~
Jlj"4
21'-8"
18'-O'~I''''
45'-1"
en
:>::
'"
'"
..,
!.IIIII'lil!llili!
e 00
"'" i /,,/
i i i
j i i
~
-8
~
~
,,--8
-0
~
B
~
H i ~ !
IU I;;!..
,. " 0 i1
~~ ~ ~ ~
~i n
~~ I
~~
-0
.'
-~
.
I
i
.
"
~
z
o
-j
fT1
(J)
IPAIfI<<:n 1HI@.8
ijlllfl@n~~~@lNIAIb @li'lritC~ ~Il!JDWilHl~
N.W.C. SUMMERHILL DR. /CANYON ESTATES OR.
LAKE ELSINORE. CALIFORNIA
OWNlR
CANYOII PUZA PARTIIER.
LLC
it
!
888
......, . ,,/
! !"
i i
! i
i i
i i
; ,
~
~, 9S0
, I""
i Ii
i j;
~
-8
~
CD
CD
'"
~
~
CD
'g
~
V>
.....,
---- ~- .--8
--B
~ ~
-B
~
l>
::0
"
I CD
CD ~
--j '"
fT) "'0
" .....,
--j
C
::0 ~
l>
r
CD
(fJ ~
fTl
" ~
0
Z
0
Tl -B
r
D ~
0
::0
-U
r J~...o. pJ,....
l>
Z
21'-,' 18'-(l"
4!l'-8'
c
",
t)
! D Illllilil!lliil
VJ
0:
"
"
...
~A~cn IH!@. ~
1Pl~@IF~t1t1U@IH!AI!. @lFlFnc~ WJl!iJnl!.~nlHl~
~
o
~
N.W.C. SUMMERHILL DR. / CANYON ESTATES DR.
LAKE ELSINORE. CALIFORNIA
~~.
OWl..
CAIIYON PLAZA PAIlTIlIIl.
LLC
UN PIUUTLY D....., suni: 101
",A(8~
PAGE
.
it n
h ::ij
,. ~.
;;;a . J
!~ n
:i i i
!! ~
i! ~
,e i
,.
-\
i
R
!
i
~
i~
iii~
.
!~
~~
'"~
~~
is
~~
s:
~-
- .
..
I~
~~
z
o
--j
fTl
(fJ
tr-rrnnrf.
1 ~ ..
::e
f'l
Vl
-I
OJ
C
r
o
z
C,
f'l
r
f'l
<
l>
--j
o
z
=m
- I--
- I--
f--
I--
I--
;a ;a =m~
- I--
- I-- 's
- IE>
I--
"" "" $ ""'
.. <^\ \\ """
\ \~\1 ~
II I lal\ .ev
" --$
--$
Ii!! 'Vi /1 ~
II -I.:Jj
~
~
.ev
- I--
- I--
- I--
~
- -
f-- -
f-- - ~
- '"-'
~
~
;
~
f-- It-- ----$
I-- II-- (T;;>
,*Y ......-
..
..
CB CBCB CB CBCB CB CB CB CB CB CB
! I i ~ l ~ ~ . I U jl f'l
i
i I i ! . i . I II II X
I ~ ~ .-i
; i . ~ i. !M f'l
M 5 I I 'i 's ~ ;:0
I I , i o III 0
I M ~ . n ;:0
- '"
~ I M !
::3 "T]
! - -
'" z
z ~
V1
::r:
f'l
Vl
tr-rrnnrf.... . . " ... .
: ";1 I
f'l
l>
V1
--j
OJ
c
r
o
z
C>
f'l
r
f'l
<
l>
--j
o
z
J;
~
'"
ED ED ED ED ED lID lID lID lID lID ED ED ED ED ED ED ED ED ED lID
I 5 ;;1 5 i . ~ ~ H~ u ~ ~ ; ~ . ~ [T1
- Ii i!: x
i ; ~i i i . I Hi J ~ --j
i I i ; . ~ ! !~
. ! !- f'l
i ~ i, ; I IS ~ ! ~i . ;:0
! ~ i! . i ! I I ~o\ '"
i i ~ ; 'i I i '" ,~
I nl . ~ i I i I III 0
i . . ; ;; I I n ;:0
! ~ ! ~ ; i I p;::
. , . . I I I
~ I ! ! . . B . .... l>
~ I i I i I 0 ---<
1 ; ~ ~ a I z f'l
; I . . I I ;:0
. . l>
r
V1
en
:Il
'"
'"
..,
!l[Illllllllllill
~
n
&>
WlAlllcn IHI@, e
IPIII@IFU~~@IHLU @1F1F~C~~\\m.@~IIMIl
N.W.C. SUMMERHILL DR. I CANYON EST AT,S DR.
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIfORNIA
1"1 .. .' 'rrmri
Vl
o
c
---<
::r:
OJ
c
r
CJ
z
C>
f'l
r
f'l
<
l>
--j
o
z
z
a
;:0
--j
::r:
OJ
c
r
o'
z
C)
f'l
r
f'l
..:
l>
--l
o
Z
,;
~
'"
;'1 -, ~. Ii I il
,ii a. IS .j j "j
... ,. .,. ~
':; .; .~ .1 S .!
~.z .. z li' ,;;I"
OJ: ;: :~ ~! ! }~
~ i I" .. ,: 1 .'
~ e I a i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ i ~ :~ i~ - ·
!~ i~ ~. ~.~
a H ii ~!
~i Rj I 1;
.1 I !:i
~! !! ;;: %f
~; ~ l i i
.' ,
"'i i
z
o
--j
f'l
V1
OWNI. i.I ..~.H.t~.~
CANYON PLt~t PARTNERS r f . ~ [: Cl
u.l r~ ~.
" ~ rl :-
! i r ~ .
PAGE ~'O OF 45
J>
:;0
(") ~
I
-<
rn
(")
-<
C
:;0
J>
r
:;0
0
0
."
"1J
r
J>
Z
..~
~ t)
~
o
@D
888
"".~ 1 (/
t i i
i i j
l i 1
i i i
Iii
I I i
y
E<, cr,~
" II'
i i j
i j i
~
"
~
~ ~
~
Jlj..-o.
21'-8.
"4 l~"-"
4~' -8"
U}
;J:
'"
'"
"'
! .lllilil\llil!i
~
-0
~
~
",--8
- -0
;. ~
~ i
------- -=~ ~B./!!)
---- (--0)
~
--8
~
1Pl~Iii@n INI@. ~
1Pl1ii@1r~~~D@INIU @lrlm:~ ~~U,IP!DINI~
N.'.C. SUMMERHILL DR. I CANYON ESTATES DR.
LAKE ELSINORE. CALIFORNIA
n~
~ ~ .
~ ~
" !
. ~
~
.
i ~ 5
;n
d~
~ ~ i
i ~ ,
i ~
i!
, ,
II
! .
q
i
z
o
-<
fT1
Vl
OWNIR
CANYON PUZA PARTN!RI
LLC
l> )>
::tI ::tI
() ()
:r :r
-i -i
'" fTl
() "
-i -i
C C
::0 -e ::0
l> )>
r r ---G
[JJ [JJ
c c
r ----8 r ---G
0 0
z z ---G
Gl Gl
(/) (/)
'" '"
() [")
-i -I
0 0
z z
[IJ ; )>
I , I
OJ i )>
i
i uuu-G
i
,
35'-0.
3'-0.
.,
~
o
@V
Ul
;I:
..
..
...
! 1I111111'1'lii~
35'-<1"
3'-0.
----8
fi
--(0)
---G
~
-----C)
------8
. "
- . . . . . . . . .
U ,; !~..~ ~~
~ " , , -
n ~~;~R "
a .'!
. ' ~ 8 . , . ,
, . i n ~; h
~ ; ~~;~~ ~~
~ ~ H z
. ~ ~~ 0
~ ~ -I
~ i . ;8 '"
~ ~ ~ ! ' .' (/)
i ~d ..
~ ~ W'
.0
o.
.!
~!
.
~ ~
i i
o 0
! .
.
to
s ~
i :
! ~
P
!
~
IF>!IPJICU !NI@, ~
1F>1PJ@lrn~D@lNItu @1r1r~1C~ ~l\DDI!.[Q)DINI@
OWN.N
CAIlYOIl PUZA PAR TilERS
LLC
if nw
r l.ei
ji t i!-
n i ~~
OF
N.W.C. SU~~ERHJLL DR. I CANYON ESTATES OR.
LAKE ELSINORE. CALIFORNIA
101M '.'lnt.,. DIlfTI,.tlITl tOl
C4~~.4ifEi1t6.
PACE 41...
I
~I
II
I
,1
I
I
. .1'
,
II
II
,\
I
"
!I ~
~~ ~
iiH
it!! 0
"'!; i'8"
g ~..
~ ~ Ii 0 S
;.. ~ I ...
o .. ~
'"
~ ;1 il ;;
~
i I! "
i I
" Ge:ee@@ 01 I
@ ~.~i "~~u~ln~ ~
, 10' 0 . Illl IIUll.j!l [:j
.~ i i '~) f"'~.! ~ I !!lil! Will f;; ~
1/ "">-, ""'" oJ @.t d l 52
~~~~~~ ~~~~~_~____ !l - 00
Ii ~ !I! Ii liP i p q!i qq !Ii 1I'Iili Ii! I!' Ii Ii Ii !!:j Ii i I,; i; Ii I; I f3 ~ ~
!I Pll !!liI H 1l!1l III!!! ill! i I n!!!! In!!! IH! ! I, f! j! ~: ~
II ~ 'I; In h! d 1 q!1 : :n II; 1!II'Hi!! nl'u! nlll,!i i! lll~ hi! ~ ~ ~
f: ~ ~I II II 'I I; ih I :~ ~ .;8 ! I ~ I I ~ I ii ~ I~ ml II ~ ~ ! ~ ~ C<")
!i ! li I i III I n !I! nn ~ illl1il! i II!i ill III Ii! l! l! ~ ~ ;
. . 'I "\1;' · 'I' ,:< · I,' 'pI I ' 1': ~~ ! ,;1 ..' 'I I ' I" gj lO: '"
~ I II i Id I !!! lit ni! m Inti I; n: I: i I ! !l! !! d ~ fl ~ ~ ~
. I I ..ll p, "q' II' .' 'l Ii" '. I" .... ;I i . ~ z
i 11 !j: I i f I! ~ ? IH! n IH l ! I jl I P llll 8 '"
,I I II II II .' I" ; ,- ! P II l! · !l I illl' ~ ~
II!; ~al I:~ I: !I ; II'; ~e I e I'~ I~ ;1 I ~ i~ l I~'; ~: ~
tl~1 ~i "~ ; h I ~~I t _ ~ ~ ~ t l >
!ii!' I! :!I' II!I ! i ~, : : I I' ·
In ~BUP~IU.I'HI Hili li I,., lill i!11
I' I' i 'I I i I ! Ii I i Ii ! !Ill!. i l ' :I~
~ ~ 81 ;~al.~ ~ 6~
8 ~sl ,
~ ~ l;l
ACENOA ITEM NO. ')
PAGE ~ ') OF 4')
I
I
! IIlljl\il\ilill!
"'U"'U
;0)>
m;o
r()
~m
r
Zeo
)>
;0
-<
>
z
o
en
()
)>
"'U
m
"'U
>
Z
>
^
m
m
r
en
-
z
o
;0
m
~
(')
)>
:i~~ ~
I ~
II
[
~~~s;:
!i1~oz
~~~~
alm~~
~~~m
;u~!Il(")
~;gRl~
000(")
2l~Sc:
tJ3e~>
;u - '-t
~ ~ (5
g !i1 ~
~ ~
",al
!:3iil
~T
,,'"
b
'"
'"
al
~ -n
I ~I ~ ~
rZ
~ 0
(")
iil! II ~
~~ ~I ~!
i ~~
~~
~-
~~
a~
~
Ilr~ it ~~ >
",m Z
gJO ~ rn 0
~ (JJ
ui ~ ~ ~ lil n ~! ~ ()
>
r ~;o ~ "U
I~ ~ ~ ~ ! 'I z m
5 I ~ r
~ I ,,~d I ~ , ~ m
~ .. m OJ " I G>
~ ~ ;~ ;~ ~ ~ m m
~
ffl Z
5
, !Iil!llll!!!l! ~ ~ ~ I II 0 0
0
~ il:
~I~~~~~~~<i~~~ ~ ~ ~ s::
z iIl~ 0
~ ~ z
I'd!' II ~t III ~
i i
m
s ( ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~
. .... ~
m
;u
C ;c
en c
m en
m
~ ~ ~ ~
. n:t
;c
c
CIJ
m
~ (
- 0
III c
... ,.
~ z
~
~ - 0
I AGENDA tTEM NO. ;,
PAGE 4- OF 4$
C,ANYONPL7!tPARTNERS it Hlrt~ ~
j- f
..","'"",""'" "'",101 ,i u
Tel (1&0) ,c:::::. ~:=) ~t-mg ~ ~ I [r
PARGEL NO. C;
PROfESSIONAL OfflGE BUILDING
N.W.C. SUMMERHILL DR. / CANYON ESTATES DR.
lAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
.
!r
, ,
, I q
i!
II _..~
i ,....
I II
I
1 i I
1,1
1--,--
t\
~~>
'"
'" ~ ~&. '1~ ~ i I! ~
~!~ . ~~ ~
il~ \~q TI
l ~ I:'"il~
~t'-> ~& ~ I p'
i d
~!
~'5}
~~~
\\
1$!1"1\I"I
'.....
a\
.
'iii
~ ~ i ~ ~~~
_ Iil '1 ~~~
!;l trl b ...
~
~
~
~t~
~~N
~
~
I~:"~~-'-'P' -:---.-------... '-"---m'~ - -"'"
i ;.: --:t...:==.- ' !,: ~. - r--
~ ~ ~ I"~! CJ ~
8 Ii ""'3~ ~
:; iiUI,I: nUl, n~ u~nm;J;ill u~!LIII~i~~1
;~ ~ J!f ~i~ili! q~t ~~;~i ;,~ ~ M~ ~ ~
! unl : l!q !ill! Ill! l'n ~~ lil ~til i
Ii ; ~~'~ i ! II! P, ~ · II: ~d ~ i
i~ ~ = ~~ a ~ . ~
a~ ~
ACENOA ITEM NO.
PACiE 45 OF
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
TO:
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION
FROM:
ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE:
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PREPARED BY:
LINDA MILLER, PLANNING CONSULTANT
PROJECT TITLE:
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
APPLICANT:
LAING CP LAKE ELSINORE, LLC. 31881
CORYDON, SUITE 130, LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA 92530
OWNER:
SAME
PROJECT REQUESTS
The applicant is requesting approval of the design and construction of a Club House
building and associated improvements that will be a part of a future Golf Course
complex known as "The Links at Summerly."
PROJECT LOCATION
The Commercial Design Review No. 2006-05 for the design and construction of a
Club House building and associated improvements is located within the 707 acre Laing
Homes project which is a portion of the 3,000 acre East Lake Specific Plan. The site is
designated Open Space and is part of the Phase 1 portion of the East Lake Specific
Plan- Amendment No. Six. The Club House facility is located south of Malaga Road,
southeast of Lucerne Street, north or Cereal Street and south west of Mission Trail
(APN 371-030-038). Access to the Club House facility will be taken from Malaga
Road, then Diamond Drive to Village Parkway.
AGENDA ITEM NO.-o Lf
PACE_ l OF~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PAGE20F6
PROJECT TITLE: COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Pro' ect Site
North
South
East
West
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
East Lake S ecific Plan
East Lake S ecific Plan
East Lake S ecific Plan
East Lake S ecific Plan
East Lake S ecific Plan
BACKGROUND
The East Lake Specific Plan (ELSP) was adopted by Ordinance No. 955 by City
Council in June 1993. The Plan consists of 3,000 acres and was originally divided into
three (3) individual districts that included a Marina District, Lakeside Resort, and
Recreation Village. Several Amendments have been made to the East Lake Specific
Plan. The first two (2) amendments (Amendment No.1 and No.2) changed the central
area or Phase One of the Specific Plan. The changes primarily reduced the number of
residential units and commercial uses and added a Golf Course to the open space area
ofthe plan. Phase One is the development area where the current Laing project is now
located. Two other amendments, Amendment No.3 and No.4, were related to
industrial development along Corydon Avenue which are both outside of Phase One.
Amendment No.5 is for the proposed marina development located on Lakeshore Drive
and known as WatersEdge.
The Laing Homes processed East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 which was
adopted by City Council on July 27,2004. This amendment replaced multi-family uses
with single family uses, provided several parks and added an approximately 165 acre
Golf Course with Club House facility. The current project before the Planning
Commission, the Club House building and associated improvements for "The Links at
Summerly Golf Course" will be the first building constructed for the Laing Homes
portion of the East Lake Specific Plan. The actual Golf Course is anticipated to follow
this proposal.
AGENDMTEM ~
PAGE''''' OF~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PAGE30F6
PROJECT TITLE: COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to construct a Club House building and associated
improvements that will support a future Golf Course. The construction of a Pump
Building and Range Shack are also for consideration. Originally the applicant was
requesting approval of a Maintenance/Golf Cart Building in addition to the Club House
building, but it was decided to withdraw that portion of the application at this time.
The proposed 5,186 square foot Club House building will be located on an
approximately 3.5 acre parcel. The building coverage is approximately 3 percent (3 % )
of the parcel area. The building will include a pro shop, restaurant, kitchen, offices, and
restrooms. An outdoor public area that extends the entire rear length ofthe Club House
building will provide unrestricted views of the Golf Course. The outdoor area will
include a terrace restaurant, barbeque and fire pit area, and seating walls. Decorative
concrete and decomposed granite paving will be used to highlight this area. A six foot
(6') decorative split face block wall will be constructed along the northern and
southern boundary lines providing a buffer between the Club House and the
neighboring residential lots. The rear western property line will be left open to capture
the expansive views of the Golf Course below and the Cleveland National Forest in the
distance.
Architecture
The applicant is proposing to use Craftsman style architecture for the Club House
building. Features include wood shingle siding and elongated windows with wide
wood trim. The entry includes an extended wood trellis Porte-cochere with masonry
based columns. Exposed rafter tails and heavy wood outlookers are added features of
the varied roof lines.
AGENDA ITEM l..\
PAGE.LOF~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PAGE40F6
PROJECT TITLE: COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
Color and Materials
The follow lists the colors and materials proposed for the Club House building:
Architectural Feature
Roof
Walls
Attic Louvers
Exposed wood/Trim
Material
Cedarlite concrete tile
Shingle Siding
Wood
Wood
Color
Gray/Brown
Green
Dark Green
Redwood
Parking
The Club House parking lot is required to provide enough parking for both the Club
House and the Golf Course. The applicant has met the requirements of both the East
Lake Specific Plan's Parking Requirements and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
Parking Requirements when the ELSP is silent. The Site Plan lists the parking
requirements and states that 158 parking spaces are required. The project is providing
174 parking spaces plus 6 handicap spaces which meets and exceeds the requirements
of both documents. One (1) loading space is also provided. As an added feature the
applicant is providing lighting that will match the Craftsman style architecture of the
proposed Club House building. Two (2) illuminated pilasters will be located on each
side of the entry driveway. One pilaster will include the name and logo of the Golf
Course while the other pilaster will include the City of Lake Elsinore's name and new
logo.
Landscaping
Thirty-eight percent (38%) or 84,582 square feet of the project site will be covered by
landscaping material. A variety of planting materials will be used including plants that
were common to the Craftsman era of the 1920's. The Club House entrance will
include a decorative paved circular drop off area with a landscaped planter in the
center. Forty-eight inch (48") box olives trees will line the entrance and one (1)
seventy-two inch (72") box olive tree will be placed in the central planter.
AGENDA ITEM 4
PAGE~OF~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PAGE50F6
PROJECT TITLE: COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
The paved parking area will include planters with trees spaced every three (3) to four
( 4) parking spaces apart providing shade and softening the hardscape of the parking
lot.
ANAL YSIS
The Club House is the first part of the future Golf Course complex, which will be the
first golf course to be constructed within the City. The future Golf Course will add
additional recreational opportunities to the City adding to the Cities new "Dream
Extreme" philosophy of encouraging recreation.
Staff feels that the Craftsman style Club House will blend well with the proposed
future residential products to be built within the future residential development, since
the Craftsman style is proposed for the residential units as well. Staff found the project
meets the requirements of the East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment No.6 and the City
of Lake Elsinore's Municipal Code.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code 99 21000
et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. 99 15000 et seq.), public
agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and paperwork associated with the
implementation of CEQA by using previously prepared environmental documents
when those previously prepared documents adequately address the potential impacts of
the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15006).
CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes the standard to be used when determining
whether subsequent environmental documentation is necessary. Section 15162 says
that when an environmental document has already been adopted for a project, no
subsequent environmental documentation is needed for subsequent entitlements which
comprise the whole of the action unless substantial changes or new information are
presented by the project.
A Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was approved and adopted in
2004 for the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 (SCH #2003071050) and
evaluated environmental impacts that would result from maximum build-out of the
AGENDA ITEM ~
PAGE~OF~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PAGE 6 OF 6
PROJECT TITLE: COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
specific plan, which contemplated development of a golf course and clubhouse. The
request for design review of the club house is consistent with the scope of the project
as analyzed under the SEIR. The Project does not present substantial changes or new
information regarding the potential environmental impacts of development. Therefore,
no additional CEQA documentation is necessary.
RECOMMENDA TION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the following Resolutions:
Resolution No. 2006-_, recommending to the City Council adoption of the
Findings of Consistency with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan; and
Resolution No. 2006-_ recommending to City Council approval of Commercial
Design Review No. 2006-05 for a Club House building and associated improvements.
Approval is based on the attached Findings, Exhibits, and Conditions of Approval.
PREPARED BY:
Linda M. Miller, AICP, Project Planner
APPROVED BY:
f/J7m1-
Rolfe M. Preisendanz,
Director of Community Development
ATTACHMENTS:
1. VICINITY MAP
2. RESOLUTIONS:
a. RESOLUTION NO. 2006- RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTION OF THE FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE
MUL TIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN
b. RESOLUTION NO. 2006- RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
FOR A CLUB HOUSE BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED
IMPROVEMENTS
3. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
4. REDUCED EXHIBITS
5. FULL SIZED EXHIBITS
6. COLOR EXHIBITS (PRESENTED AT THE HEARING)
AGENDA ITEM 4
PAGE~OFA'\
VICINITY MAP
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENOA I'!EM NO._ L. (J. "\ -
PACE 1. OF
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO
THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF FINDINGS THAT THE
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05 IS CONSISTENT
WITH THE MULTIPLE-SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION
PLAN (MSHCP)
WHEREAS, Laing CP Lake Elsinore, LLC has submitted an application for
Commercial Design Review No. 2006-05 for a clubhouse building and associated
improvements for a golf course that is located south of Malaga Road, southeast of
Lucerne Street, north of Cereal Street and southwest of Mission Trail within East
Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 - APN 371-030-038; and
WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that all discretionary
projects within an MSHCP criteria cell undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition
Process ("LEAP") and Joint Project Review ("JPR") to analyze the scope of the
proposed development and establish a building envelope that is consistent with the
MSHCP criteria; and
WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP further requires that the City of
Lake Elsinore adopt consistency findings demonstrating that the proposed
discretionary entitlement complies with the MSCHP cell criteria, and the MSCHP
goals and objectives; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.82,
requests for commercial design review are discretionary actions to be considered,
reviewed, and approved, conditionally approved or denied by the Lake Elsinore
City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Project site is within two distinct MSHCP criteria cells:
approximately three (3) acres of the total site are within cell 4846 and
approximately three tenths (0.3) acres are within cell 4937; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal.
Pub. Res. Code SS 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R.
SS 15000 et seq.), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and
paperwork associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously
prepared environmental documents when those previously prepared documents
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~
PACE '8 OF ~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
PAGE20F6
adequately address the potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA
Guidelines Section 15006); and
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes the standard to be
used when determining whether subsequent environmental documentation is
necessary and says that when an environmental document has already been
adopted for a project, no subsequent environmental documentation is needed for
subsequent entitlements which comprise the whole of the action unless substantial
changes or new information are presented by the project; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines 15162, the Project does
not present substantial changes or new information regarding the potential
environmental impacts of development; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this
item on October 3, 2006.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Project and has
evaluated the Project's consistency with the MSHCP prior to recommending that
the City Council adopt Findings of Consistency with the MSHCP.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law, the
City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, and the MSHCP, the Planning Commission
makes the following findings that the Project is consistent with the MSHCP:
MSHCP CONSISTENCY FINDINGS
1. The Project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City
must make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval.
Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Resolution, the Project must be reviewed for
MSHCP consistency, which review shall include an analysis of the Project's
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~
PACE <1. OF r ~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
PAGE30F6
consistency with other "Plan Wide Requirements." The Project is located
within the East Lake Specific Plan (ELSP) area, specifically within the ELSP
Amendment No. 6 area. Prior to the City's adoption of the MSHCP, there
were a series of meetings between the County of Riverside, Us. Fish and
Wildlife Service, and California Department of Fish and Game to discuss
conservation measures within the ELSP and to decide how to ensure
development within the ELSP could proceed consistently with the MSHCP
and with the US. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permit. It was
determined that a target acreage of 770 acres was warranted for MSHCP
conservation in the back basin area of the City. The Project site is within
the ELSP and is covered by that conservation agreement. Part of the
conservation agreement also included a requirement that projects in the
back basin area be consistent with the other "Plan Wide Requirements" set
forth in the following sections of the MSHCP: Protection of Species
Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines
(MSHCP, ~ 6.1.2), Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines
(MSHCP, ~ 6.1.3), Additional Survey Needs and Procedures (MSHCP, ~
6.3.2), Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines (MSHCP, ~ 6.1.4), Vegetation
Mapping (MSHCP, ~ 6.3.1) requirements, Fuels Management Guidelines
(MSHCP, ~ 6.4), and payment of the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation
Fee (MSHCP Ordinance, ~ 4). The Project has been reviewed in light of
these sections and is consistent therewith.
2. The proposed project is subject to the City's LEAP and the County's Joint
Project Review processes.
The ELSP MSCHP consistency determination was submitted to the County
of Riverside in October 2003, prior to the initiation of the City's LEAP and
County's Joint Project Review process. Nevertheless, both the County and
Dudek (acting on behalf of the County) agreed that the Project was
consistent with the MSHCP due to the extensive acreage set aside for
conservation. The Project has not been modified and was part of the overall
ELSP which has been determined to be consistent with the MSHCP.
3. The Project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools
Guidelines.
ACENDA ITEM NO.
PACE \ ()
~
OF ~~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
PAGE 4 OF 6
The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was determined to be
consistent with the Riparian/Riverine and Vernal Pool Guidelines as set
forth in MSHCP ~ 6.1.2. The scope and nature of the Project have not been
modified from that which was previously approved and is therefore
consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools Guidelines.
4. The Project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant
Species Guidelines.
The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the
Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines as set forth in
MSHCP ~ 6.1.3. The Project has not been modified from that which was
previously approved under the ELSP Amendment No.6. Additionally, based
upon prior approvals, the entire project site has been graded and any plant
species which may have existed on the site have been removed. It is for
these reasons that the Project is consistent with the aforementioned
guidelines.
5. The Project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures.
The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the
Additional Survey Needs and Procedures as set forth in MSHCP ~ 6.3.2.
The Project has not been modified from that which was previously approved
under the ELSP Amendment No.6, and the entire project site has been
graded pursuant to previously issued permits. The Project is consistent with
the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures of the MSHCP.
6. The Project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines.
The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the
Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines as set forth in MSHCP ~ 6.1.4.
Because the Project has not been modified from that which was previously
approved under the ELSP Amendment No.6, no further MSHCP review is
necessary and the Project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface
Guidelines.
7. The Project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
ACENDA ITEM NO.
PACE \ \
~
OF ~~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
PAGE50F6
The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the
Vegetation Mapping requirements as set forth in MSHCP S 6.3.1. Mapping
was conducted as part of the biological surveys for the original project. The
Project has not been modified from that which was previously approved and
therefore is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
8. The Project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines.
The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the
Fuels Management Guidelines as set forth in MSHCP, S 6.4. The Project
site is not within or adjacent to conservation areas where the Fuels
Management Guidelines would be required. The Project has not been
modified from that which was previously approved and therefore is
consistent with the Fuel Management Guidelines.
9. The Project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local
Development Mitigation Fee.
As a condition of project approval, the Project will be required to pay the
City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee at the time of issuance of
building permits.
10.The Project overall is consistent with the MSHCP.
As stated in No.1 above, the Project is within the ELSP area which has
previously been determined to be consistent with the MSHCP.
11. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the
agency, that the project as revised may have significant effect on the
environment.
SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
ACEIIDA ITEM 110. 4- ~ ",-
PACE \ <J.... OF -
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
PAGE60F6
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this third day of October, 2006,
by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
ATTEST:
Rolfe M. Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
ACENDA lTEM NO. 4-
, PAce \~ _OF <:{~
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL
OF COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05 FOR A CLUB
HOUSE FOR A FUTURE GOLF COURSE FACILITY ASSOCIATED
WITH THE LAING CP LAKE ELSINORE, LLC DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, Laing CP Lake Elsinore, LLC has initiated proceedings for
Commercial Design Review No. 2006-05 for the design and construction of a
clubhouse building and associated improvements located south of Malaga Road,
southeast of Lucerne Street, north of Cereal Street, and southwest of Mission Trail
within the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 - APN No. 371-030-038 (the
"Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has
been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City
Council for Design Reviews; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal.
Pub. Res. Code 99 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R.
99 15000 et seq.), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and
paperwork associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously
prepared environmental documents when those previously prepared documents
adequately address the potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA
Guidelines Section 15006); and
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes the standard to be
used when determining whether subsequent environmental documentation is
necessary and says that when an environmental document has already been
adopted for a project, no subsequent environmental documentation is needed for
subsequent entitlements which comprise the whole of the action unless substantial
changes or new information are presented by the project; and
WHEREAS, a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was approved
and adopted in 2004 for the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 (SCH
#2003071050) and evaluated environmental impacts that would result from
maximum build-out of the specific plan, which contemplated development of a
golf course and clubhouse; and
.~
ACENOA\TEM "0._ ~~
PAGE_)4- _Of_ -
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -_
PAGE20F4
WHEREAS, the Project does not present substantial changes or new
information regarding the potential environmental impacts of development; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this
item on October 3, 2006.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Project prior to
making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the Commercial
Design Review No. 2006-05.
SECTION 2. The Planning Commission finds and determines that no new
CEQA documentation is necessary for the Project given that any and all potentially
significant environmental impacts of the clubhouse were analyzed in the
previously approved and certified Supplemental Environmental Impact Report
(SCH # 2003071050) for the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6.
SECTION 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law and
the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following
findings for the approval of the Commercial Design Review No. 2006-05:
1. The Project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the
General Plan, Specific Plan and the Zoning District in which the Project is
located.
The Project complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and
the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 in that the approval of this
clubhouse building will assist in the creation of additional job opportunities
within the community. Moreover, the Project will assist in achieving the
development of a well-balanced and functional mix of residential,
commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses
as well as encouraging commercial land uses to diversify Lake Elsinore's
economic base.
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~
PACE \ S OF ~'\
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -_
PAGE30F4
2. The Project complies with the design directives contained in the East Lake
Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 and all applicable provisions of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code.
The Project is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that
the clubhouse building has been designed in consideration of the size and
shape of the property. Sufficient setbacks and onsite landscaping have been
provided thereby creating interest and varying vistas. In addition, safe and
efficient circulation has been achieved onsite. Further, the Project will
complement the future proposed residential development and will create a
visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed
development. The Craftsman style architecture of the building will also be
used within the residential development and will tie the architecture of the
two segments of the community together. Design features such as wood
shingles, elongated windows with wide wood trim, wood trellis porte
cochere with masonry based columns, exposed rafter tails, wood outlookers
and varying roof lines provide evidence of a concern for quality and
originality.
3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the Project is not anticipated
to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
The Project, as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City divisions,
departments and agencies, will not have a significant effect on the
environment. The potential impacts associated with the project do not result
in substantial change to the previously adopted Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report. Therefore, no additional environmental review is necessary
for the proposed project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162.
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning
Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions,
have been incorporated into the approval of the Project to ensure
development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter
17.82.
Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the
Project has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning
Commission on October 3, 2006.
SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
AGEN;:;;EMt'b" OFk
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
PAGE40F4
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of October 2006, by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
ATTEST:
Rolfe M. Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~
PACE \1 OF ~~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
FOR A CLUB HOUSE BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS
APN 371-030-038
PLANNING DIVISION
(Note:Fees listed in the Conditions of Approval are the best estimates available at
the time of approval. The exact fee amounts will be reviewed at the time of
building permit issuance and may be raised.)
1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and
hold harmless the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any
claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Official, Officers, Employees,
or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the
commercial project, which action is bought within the time period provided for
in California Government Code Sections 65009 and/or 66499.37, and Public
Resources Code Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of
any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully
with the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any such
claim, or proceeding, the Applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to
defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City.
2. Applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures associated with the
Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the East Lake Specific Plan
Amendment No.6 as applicable.
3. Approval for Commercial Design Review No. 2006-05 will lapse and be void
unless building permits are issued within one (1) year following the date of
approval.
4. Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on page one of building plans
submitted to the Building Division for Plan Check. All Conditions of Approval
shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of
utilities.
AGt::NDA ITEM NO. ~
PACE \~ , OF ~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
FOR A CLUB HOUSE BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS
APN 371-030-038
5. All site improvements approved with this request shall be constructed as
indicated on the approved site plan and elevations. Revisions to approved site
plans or building elevations shall be subject to the review of the Director of
Community Development. All plans submitted for Building Division Plan
Check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of
Approval, or the Planning Commission/City Council through subsequent action.
6. Any revisions to the interior floor plans that could cause the requirement for
additional parking shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of
Community Development or designee.
7. All roof mounted or ground support air conditioning units or other mechanical
equipment incidental to development shall be architecturally screened or
shielded by landscaping so that they are not visible from neighboring property,
public streets, or Interstate 15 Any material covering the roof equipment shall
match the primary wall color.
8. All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to
create glare onto neighboring property and streets or allow illumination above
the horizontal plane of the fixture. All light fixtures shall match the architectural
style of the building.
9. All loading zones shall be clearly marked with yellow striping and shall comply
with the requirements of the LEMC.
1 a.Applicant shall meet ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements.
11. The applicant shall construct a 6 foot wrought iron fence with pilasters along
the northwest and southwestern boundaries.
12.Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standards as approved by the
Community Development Director. A minimum of as' landscaped planter is
required on each side of the trash enclosure.
AC:ENOA ITEM NO.4
PAGE , \ OF 'a ~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
FOR A CLUB HOUSE BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS
APN 371-030-038
13.No exterior roof ladders shall be permitted.
14.Applicant shall use roofing materials with Class "A" fire rating.
IS.All exterior downspouts shall be painted to match with building exterior color.
16. The Planning Division shall approve the location of any construction trailers
utilized during construction. All construction trailers shall require a $1,000.00
cash bond, submit a site plan and processed through the Planning Division.
17.Materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used
unless modified by the applicant and approved by the Community Development
Director or designee.
IS.0n-site surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks.
19.Parking stalls shall be double-striped with four-inch (4") lines two feet (2')
apart.
20.All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have a permanent
irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, approved by the
Landscape Architectural Consultant and Planning Division.
Prior To Building/Grading Permits
21.Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permits, the applicant shall
sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions" form and shall return
the executed original to the Planning Division for inclusion in the case records.
22.All signs require review and approval by the Planning and Building and Safety
Divisions prior to installation. All Sign Programs require review and approval
by the Planning Commission prior to obtaining sign permits.
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~
.PACE, ~O _OF ~ ~
CONDITION'S OF APPROVAL FOR
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
FOR A CLUB HOUSE BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS
APN 371-030-038
23.Three (3) sets of the Final Landscaping/Irrigation Detail Plan shall be
submitted, reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant
and the Community Development Director or designee, prior to issuance of
building permit. A Landscape Plan Check & Inspection Fee will be charged
prior to final landscape approval based on the Consultant's fee plus forty
percent (40%) City fee.
a) All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler
system with 100% plant and grass coverage using a combination of
drip and conventional irrigation methods.
b) Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the City's Street Tree
List, a maximum of forty feet (40) apart and at least twenty-four-inch
(24") box in size.
c) All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six-inch
(6") high and six-inch (6") wide concrete curb.
d) Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no
higher than thirty-six inches (36").
e) Landscape planters shall be planted with an appropriate parking lot
shade tree to provide for 50% parking lot shading in fifteen (15) years.
f) Any transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be
indicated on landscape plan and screened as part of the landscaping
plan.
g) The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees
and meet all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines.
Special attention to the use of Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings
with combination drip irrigation system to be used to prevent
excessive watering.
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~
PACE Q \ OF ~ ~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
FOR A CLUB HOUSE BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS
APN 371-030-038
h) All landscape improvements shall be bonded 100% for material and
labor for two years from installation sign-off by the City. The release
of the landscape bond shall be requested by the applicant at the end of
the required two years with approval/acceptance by the Landscape
Consultant and Community Development Director or Designee.
i) All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within affected
portion of any phase at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is
requested for any building. All planting areas shall include plantings
in the Xeriscape concept, drought tolerant grasses and plants.
j) Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan.
k) Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details.
24.Applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal
Water District. Proof shall be presented to the Chief Building Official prior to
issuance of building permits and final approval.
25.Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all
required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid.
26.Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all
requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department have been met.
27.Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fee in
effect at time of building permit issuance.
28.The applicant shall pay the Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee
(MSHCP) Local Development Mitigation Fee of $5,620.00 per acre prior to
obtaining building permits. The fee shall be calculated on the Club House
parcel only (APN 371-030-038).
ACiENDA ITEM NO. 4
PAGE d. ~ OF '1 ~ -
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
FOR A CLUB HOUSE BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS
APN 371-030-038
29. The Applicant shall place a weatherproof 3 'x3' sign at the entrance to the
project site identifying the approved days and hours of operation and a
statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City
of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division at (951) 674-3124.
30.The applicant shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. Construction
activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through
Friday, and no construction activity shall occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal
holidays.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
General Requirements:
31.A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall
be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is
substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is less
than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall
still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be
conducted before grading begins.
32.Prior to commencement of grading operations, the applicant shall provide a
map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material.
Such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer.
33.All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer. The
engineer shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper
erosion control. All manufactured slopes greater than 30 ft. in height shall be
contoured.
34.An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work on City right-of-
way.
AC,ENOA ITEM NO. ~
PACE ~ '3 OF ~<1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
FOR A CLUB HOUSE BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS
APN 371-030-038
35.Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults,
etc.) out of the roadway shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his
agent. Overhead utilities shall be undergrounded.
36.Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the
provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's
agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District.
37. The applicant shall install permanent bench marks per Riverside County
Standards and at locations to be determined by City Engineer.
38.Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County
Fire.
39.Applicant shall pay all applicable development fees, including but not all
inclusive: TUMF, MSHCP,TIF, and area drainage fees.
40.Ten (10) year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year
storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of
these criteria is exceeded, drainage facilities shall be provided.
41.All drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed to Riverside County
Flood Control District Standards.
42.All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie
notes delineated on 8 Yz" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering
Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be
scheduled and approved.
43. Slopes and landscaping within public right-of-way shall be maintained by
property owner's association.
ACENDA ITEM No.4
PACE ~ '-\ OF ~ ~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
FOR A CLUB HOUSE BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS
APN 371-030-038
44.All open space and slopes except for public parks and schools and flood control
district facilities, outside the public right-of-way shall be owned and maintained
by property owner's association.
45.In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal &
recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for
removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish
generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of
construction.
46.0n-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent
property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage
easement.
47.All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or
shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer.
48.Development within the Floodplain shall meet City and FEMA floodplain
requirements.
49.Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street
curb. Roofs should drain to a landscaped area.
50.Applicant shall comply with all NPDES requirements in effect; including the
submittal of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as required per the
Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. The requirements of WQMP
may affect the overall layout of the project. Therefore, WQMP submittal should
be during the initial process of the project.
ACENDA ITEM NO. 4:
PACE ').) OF ~~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
FOR A CLUB HOUSE BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS
APN 371-030-038
51.Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided
to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as
well as other environmental awareness education materials on good
housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality and
met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES
Drainage Area Management Plan. (Required for lot of one acre or more)
52.Applicant shall provide BMP's that will reduce storm water pollutants from
parking areas and driveway aisles. (Required for lot of one acre or more)
53.City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and
discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm
water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or
local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing oil,
grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water
Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are
available at City Hall.
PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain
system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or
waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
54. Submit grading plans with appropriate security, Hydrology and Hydraulic
Reports prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer for approval by the City
Engineer. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion downstream
caused by development of the site and/or diversion of drainage
55.The grading plan shall show that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are
located near the project entrance that minimizes sight distance standards.
56.Construction Project access and hauling route shall be submitted and approved
by the City Engineer,
AGENDA IlEM NO. \
PAGE ~ b OF 9-~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
FOR A CLUB HOUSE BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS
APN 371-030-038
57.Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design
recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with
recommendations.
58.An Alquist-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden
earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on-site.
59. The applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements and/or permits for
off-site grading and/or drainage acceptance from the adjacent property owners
prior to grading permit issuance.
60.Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The
applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the
goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage
Area Management Plan.
61.Applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a Notice of Intent
with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program with a storm water pollution
prevention plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall
provide a SWPPP for post construction, which describes BMP's that will be
implemented for the development including maintenance responsibilities. The
applicant shall submit the SWPPP to the City for review and approval.
62.Applicant shall provide proof that the project meets FEMA floodplain
requirements and balance of grading (fill/removal) in the floodplain per RCFC
District requirements.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
63.All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of
development specific for this project and as required in the Specific Plan.
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~ ___
PACE?l ~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
FOR A CLUB HOUSE BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS
APN 371-030-038
64.Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the
applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been
made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the
location. such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter prior to
applying for a building permit.
65. The applicant shall show that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are
located near the project entrance that minimizes sight distance standards.
66.Submit proof that the project meets the minimum floodplain elevation (1267')
requirements.
67.Pay all Capital Improvement TIF, Railroad Canyon Benefit District Fees, and
Master Drainage Fees and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34).
Prior to Occupancy
68.Pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the
Engineering Division for construction of off-site public works improvements
(LEMCI2.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment
permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy.
69.All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie
notes delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering
Division before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and
approved.
70.All public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved
plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
71.All signing and striping and traffic control devices shall be installed. This
includes Street Name Signs, Parking and Stop signs, and signing and striping
onsite. A signoff from the City Traffic Engineer is required.
ACENDA ITEM NO. 4
" PACE ~ ~ _OF ~ <1.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05
FOR A CLUB HOUSE BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS
APN 371-030-038
72.Water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with Water
District requirements.
73.Proof of acceptance of maintenance responsibility of slopes, open spaces, and
drainage facilities shall be provided.
74.Elevation Certificates shall be provided.
75. TUMF fees shall be paid. The TUMF fees shall be the effective rate at the time
when the Certificate of Occupancy is obtained.
End of Conditions
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~
PACE a...' OF ~ I\.
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
TO:
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DA TE:
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PREPARED BY:
LINDA MILLER, PLANNING CONSULTANT
PROJECT TITLE:
MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A RESIDENTIAL
DUPLEX LOCATED ON KELLOGG STREET (APN
374-044-007)
APPLICANT:
BT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.
30342 ESPERANZA
RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA, CALIFORNIA
92688
OWNER:
SAME
PROJECT REQUEST
The applicant is requesting design review consideration for a conventionally built two
story attached residential duplex building to be placed on one (1) vacant lot pursuant to
Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Design Standards), and
Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC)
and the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Standards.
PROJECT LOCATION
The duplex units will be constructed on Kellogg Street between Pottery Street and
Sumner Avenue in the area known as the Historic Overlay District of the City of Lake
Elsinore. The Zoning and General Plan Designation are Medium Density Residential,
Assessor Parcel Number 374-044-007.
ACENDA ITEM NO. .6
PAGE~OF 2(P
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PAGE20F4
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A DUPLEX ON
KELLOGG STREET (APN 374-044-007)
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Project Vacant MD - (Medium Density) MD - (Medium Density)
Site
Northeast Single Family MD - (Medium Density) MD - (Medium Density)
Residential
Southeast Vacant MD - Medium Densi MD - Medium Densi
Southwest Single Family MD - (Medium Density) MD - (Medium Density)
Residential
Northwest Vacant MD - Medium Densi ) MD - Medium Densi
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The two story duplex building includes two (2) 1,651 square foot residential units with
two (2) 590 square foot attached garages for a total of 3,218 square feet of building
footprint area or thirty-five percent (35%) of the total lot area of9,148 square feet.
This meets the maximum allowable building area of thirty-five percent (35%) per the
requirements of the Historic Elsinore Standards. Each two story unit includes a great
room, kitchen, laundry area, three (3) bedrooms, and two (2) bathrooms. Each garage
includes an eighty square foot storage area.
Architectural Design
The duplex utilizes architectural features ofthe Craftsman style architecture. Features
include wrap around covered porches, horizontal wood siding, decorative windows
with wide trim, elephantine columns with masonry trim, wood railing, multiple roof
planes, and vertical siding at gabled ends.
AGENDA ITEM 5
PAGE ~OF~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PAGE30F4
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A DUPLEX ON
KELLOGG STREET (APN 374-044-007)
The following is a summary of the materials and colors proposed for each unit:
Architectural Feature
Horizontal Siding
Vertical Siding
Accent/Trim
Column Base
Roofing
Material
"Hardiplank" wood
"Hardiplank" wood
W ood/F oam
Masonry
Light weight concrete
Color
Khaki Brown
Sierra 8-Colonial Grey
Navajo WhiteINavajo Beige
Santa Cruz/Coastal Ledge
Multi brown
Landscaping and Fencing
An automatic irrigation system and landscaping will be provided on all open areas that
are not paved. Approximately 3,531 square feet or thirty-nine percent (39%) of the lot
area will be landscaped. A six foot (6') decorative masonry wall with pilasters will be
constructed around the rear portions of the lot. A three foot (3') decorative masonry
wall with pilasters will enclose the front setback area.
ANALYSIS
Staff has reviewed the project and found that with the attached Conditions of
Approval, the residential project complies with the minimum requirements ofthe Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code and the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Standard
including but not limited to density, setbacks, landscaping, parking and lot coverage.
Additionally, Staff has determined that the residential duplex units will meet and/or
exceed the quality of the existing homes in the area.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA), this project is
categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15303 (New Construction or
Conversion of Small Structures) Class 3(a) that exempts up to three (3) single family
residences.
AGENDA ITEM 5
PAGE~OF~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PAGE40F4
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A DUPLEX ON
KELLOGG STREET (APN 374-044-007)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2006-_
approving the Minor Design Review for the duplex residences and associated
improvements located at Kellogg Street - APN 374-044-007. Approval is based on the
attached Findings, Exhibits, and Conditions of Approval.
PREPARED BY:
LINDA MILLER, AICP, PROJECT PLANNER
APPROVED BY:
ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ATTACHMENTS:
1. VICINITY MAP
2. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
3. PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
4. CEQA - NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
5. REDUCED EXHIBITS
6. FULL SIZED EXHIBITS
7. FULL SIZED COLOR ELEVATIONS (presented at Hearing)
AGENDAI~TEM 5
PAGE~OF~
VICINITY MAP
MINOR DESIGN REVIEW
DUPLEX ON KELLOGG STREET
PLANNING COMMISSION
ACEN{}A ITEM NO._S __
PAGE 5 ~b
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX
PROJECT LOCATED ON KELLOGG STREET
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by
B T Development Company, Inc. requesting approval of a Minor Design Review
for a residential duplex building to be constructed on one (1) vacant lot located on
Kellogg Street between Pottery Street and Sumner Avenue (APN 374-004-007)
pursuant to Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential
Development Standards), Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), and the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design
Standards and;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has
been delegated with the responsibility of approving Minor Design Review requests
for residential projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given and the
Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with
respect to this item on October 3, 2006.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE,
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed
design for the duplex residences and has found them acceptable. The Planning
Commission finds and determines that this project is consistent with the LEMC
and is exempt from further environmental clearance under Section 15303, Class
3(a) (New Construction of Small Structures), of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA).
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of
the LEMC, the following findings for the approval of the project have been made
as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the
General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project is located.
ACENOA lTl:fft NO.
PACe b
S
OF 'Q b
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
PAGE20F3
The proposed Minor Design Review for a duplex structure for two (2) single
family residences located at Kellogg Street (APN 374-044-007) complies with
the goals and objectives of the General Plan, in that the approval of the duplex
residences will assist in achieving the development of a well-balanced and
functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational
and institutional land uses as well as encouraging the development and
maintenance of a broad range of housing types for all income groups and age
categories. The Craftsman architecture meets the requirements of the Historic
Elsinore Architectural Design Standards.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060
and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The proposed Minor Design Review for a duplex structure for two (2) single
family residences located at Kellogg Street (APN 374-044-007) are appropriate
in size and design to the lot and meets all setback requirements, provides front
yard landscaping, and complies with the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design
Standards by proposing Craftsman style architecture. Features include wrap
around covered porches, horizontal wood siding, decorative windows with wide
trim, elephantine columns with masonry trim, wood railing, multiple roof
planes, and vertical siding at gabled ends. The duplex residences will
complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually
pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and existing
projects in that the architectural design, color and materials proposed meet or
exceed the size and design of the homes in the surrounding area.
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not
anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
The proposed Minor Design Review for a duplex structure for two (2) single
family residences located at Kellogg Street (APN 374-044-007) as reviewed
and conditioned by all applicable City Divisions and Departments and
Agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment pursuant to
Article 19 (Categorical Exemptions) and Section 15303, Class 3(a) (New
Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code,
including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been
ACENDA ITEM NO. S
pA(;e 1 OF Q~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_
PAGE30F3
incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of
the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed Minor Design Review for a
duplex structure for two (2) single family residences located at Kellogg Street
(APN 374-044-007) has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the
Planning Commission. The project has been conditioned to comply with the
LEMC and Historic Standards. The Minor Design Review has been evaluated
pursuant to Section 17.82.100 (Minor Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code (LEMC) and all other applicable Sections of the LEMC and
the Historic Standards. The project was found to be in compliance with all
regulations and objectives of LEMC and the Historic Standards.
SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this third day of October, 2006,
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
ATTEST:
Rolfe M. Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
ACENDA ITEM NO.
PACe ~
5
OF d.. ~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW
FOR A DUPLEX STRUCTURE FOR
TWO (2) SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENCES
LOCATED AT KELLOGG STREET (APN 374-044-007)
Note: Fees listed in the Conditions of Approval are the best estimates available at
the time of approval. The exact fee amounts will be reviewed at the time of permit
issuance and may be revised.
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials,
officers, employees, and/or agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against
the City, its officials, officers, employees, or agents concerning the project
attached hereto, which action is brought forward within the time period
provided for in California Government Code Section 65009 and Public
Resources Code Section 21167.
2. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final ten (10) days from the
. date of the decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Council
pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.80 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code.
PLANNING DIVISION
3. Minor Design Review approval for a duplex structure for two (2) single family
residences located at Kellogg Street (APN 374-044-007) will lapse and be void
unless a building permit is issued within one (1) year of the approval date.
4. Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced upon page one of building plans
submitted to the Building and Safety Division for Plan Check. All Conditions of
Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and
release of utilities.
5. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall sign and
complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions," and shall return the executed
original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case
records.
Page 1 of 10
AGENDA ITEM NO. :)
PAGE ~ OF 'd. b
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW
FOR A DUPLEX STRUCTURE FOR
TWO (2) SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENCES
LOCATED AT KELLOGG STREET (APN 374-044-007)
6. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site
plan and elevations, with revisions as noted herein. The applicant shall meet all
required setbacks pursuant to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). Any
other revisions to the approved site plan or building elevations shall be subject
to the review of the Community Development Director or his designee. All
plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check shall conform to the
submitted plans as modified by Conditions of Approval, or the Planning
Commission through subsequent action.
7. Materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used
unless modified by the applicant and approved by the Community Development
Director or designee.
8. All windows shall use surrounds and/or other architectural-type features as
shown on the approved plans or modified with the approval of the Community
Development Director or designee.
9. Concrete tile or similar material as stated on the plans shall be required.
Roofing materials shall have a minimum Class "A" Fire rating, and so noted on
the construction plans.
10.Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances.
I1.A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers placed
on the site and used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal
of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to the
approval of the Community Development Director or designee.
12.The applicant shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. Construction
activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through
Friday, and no construction activity shall occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal
holidays.
Page 2 of 10
ACENDA ITEM NO. 5
PAOE \ 0 OF ~ b
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW
FOR A DUPLEX STRUCTURE FOR
TWO (2) SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENCES
LOCATED AT KELLOGG STREET (APN 374-044-007)
13.Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance.
Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with
the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted control
techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided thirty (30) days
after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer.
14.Applicant shall meet all applicable County Fire Department requirements for
fire protection.
15.Applicant shall meet all applicable Building and Safety Division requirements.
16.Any exterior air conditioning or other mechanical equipment shall be ground
mounted and screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property or
public streets. Air conditioning units and related equipment may not encroach
more than two-feet (2') into the required minimum side yard setback.
17. Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum interior clear space of
twenty feet (20') x twenty feet (20') for two cars.
18.The Applicant shall plant twenty-four inch (24") box street trees selected from
the City Street Tree List, a maximum of thirty feet (30') apart and along all
street frontages. Planting is subject to the approval of the Community
Development Director or designee prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy.
19. The Applicant shall provide shrubs and plant materials as shown on the
landscape plan. Any changes to this plan shall be subject to the approval of the
Community Development Director or designee. The landscape plan shall be
implemented prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
20.Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than
36 inches.
Page 3 of 10
ACENDA ITEM NO. 5
PAce \ , OF ~ b
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW
FOR A DUPLEX STRUCTURE FOR
TWO (2) SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENCES
LOCATED AT KELLOGG STREET (APN 374-044-007)
21. The Applicant shall provide front yard irrigation systems as shown on the
landscape plans. The irrigation system shall be implemented prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
22. The Applicant shall provide a rain sensor as shown on the landscape plan. The
rain censor shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
23.All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have permanent
irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, as approved by the
City's Landscape Architect. A Planting and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted,
approved and planted prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Fees
are required for review of plans and inspections.
24.Driveways shall be constructed of concrete per Building and Safety Division
standards.
25.Walls or fences located in any front yard shall not exceed thirty-six inches (36")
in height with the exception that wrought-iron fences may be five feet (5') in
height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited.
26.The applicant shall construct a six foot (6') decorative masonry wall with
pilasters and gates as shown on the plans. The wall will be constructed along
the side and rear property line. The six foot (6') shall not encroach into the
front setback area. It will be the responsibility of the applicant to contact the
neighboring property owners to remove any existing fencing.
27.The building address shall be a minimum of four inches (4") high and shall be
easily visible from the public right-of-way. Care shall be taken to select colors
and materials that contrast with building walls or trim.
28.Applicant shall provide a flat concrete pad a minimum of 3'- 0" by 7'- 0"
adjacent to each dwelling. The storage pad for trash barrels shall be concealed
from public view.
29. The applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore
Unified School District have been paid prior to issuance of building permits.
Page 4 of 10 ACENDA. ITEM NO. ~
PAGE '1.. OF b
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW
FOR A DUPLEX STRUCTURE FOR
TWO (2) SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENCES
LOCATED AT KELLOGG STREET (APN 374-044-007)
30.The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees in effect at the time prior to issuance of
building permits.
31. The applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities.
32.The applicant shall submit water plans to EVMWD and shall incorporate all
District conditions and standards, including payment of applicable connection
fees.
33.The applicant shall pay the Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee
(MSHCP) Local Development Mitigation Fee prior to obtaining building
permits.
34. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $64.00 made payable to the
County of Riverside for a Notice of Exemption. The check shall be submitted to
the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the projects approval.
35. The Applicant shall pay all applicable Library Capital Improvement Fund fee.
36.Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Project, the Developer shall
enter into an agreement with the City and the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Lake Elsinore to provide (a) 15% of the units constructed in the Project
as affordable housing units in accordance with the requirements of Section
33413(b)(2) of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health &
Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.), or (b) an alternative equivalent action as
determined by the City which may include (without limitation) dedication of
vacant land, construction of affordable units on another site, or payment of an
in-lieu fee at the rate of $2.00 per square-foot of assessable space for each
dwelling unit in the Project. For purposes of this condition, "assessable space"
means all of the square-footage within the perimeter of a structure, not
including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio,
detached accessory structure, or similar area. The amount of the square-footage
within the perimeter of a residential structure shall be calculated by the building
department of the City in accordance with the standard practice of the City in
calculating structural perimeters.
Page 5 of 10
ACENDA ITEM NO.
PACE \ ~
S
OF db
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW
FOR A DUPLEX STRUCTURE FOR
TWO (2) SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENCES
LOCATED AT KELLOGG STREET (APN 374-044-007)
ENGINEERING DIVISION
37.All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of
development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to
building permit.
38.Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the
applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been
made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the
location, such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter prior to
applying for a building permit.
39.Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults,
etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property
owner or his agent.
40.Provide fire protection access and facilities as required in writing by Riverside
County Fire.
41.In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal &
recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for
removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish
generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of
construction.
42.All grading and street improvement plans submitted to engineering shall be
drawn on 24" x 36" Mylar and be set into City's specific border and title block
and include city specific general notes for grading or street improvements
respectively. Digital files for the border and the notes are available by request
to "agutierrez@lake-elsinore.org".
DEDICATION:
43.Dedicate a 2.5' wide strip of additional right of way alone northerly property
line to the City for alley widening prior to issuance of building permit.
Page 6 of 10
AGENDA ITEM NO. S
PAGE ) '--\ OF r;).. b
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW
FOR A DUPLEX STRUCTURE FOR
TWO (2) SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENCES
LOCATED AT KELLOGG STREET (APN 374-044-007)
44.Public right-of-way dedications shall be prepared by the applicant or his agent.
Deeds shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval
prior to issuance of building permit.
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
45.Construct street pavement from gutter edge line to one foot beyond centerline
of Kellogg Street (the minimum pavement section shall be 3" Asphalt Concrete
over 5" Aggregate Base) from the south property line to 20' beyond the north
property line of the property, per approved street plans (LEMC Title 12).
46.Construct full width alley improvements, including alley aprons and pavement,
per Standard No. 500 of Riverside County Road Improvement Standards and
Specification, from Kellogg Street pavement line to pavement line of Lindsay
Street. Plans shall be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to
issuance of building permit (LEMC 16.34).
47.A Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare street and alley improvement
plans and specifications. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to
Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes
(LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). Street improvement plans shall show existing and
future profiles at centerline of street, at top of curb and at centerline of the alley.
The profiles and contours shall extend to 50' beyond the property limits on
Kellogg Street centerline.
48.Work done under an encroachment permit for off-site improvements shall be
delineated on the street improvement plans and approved and signed by the City
Engineer prior to issuance of building permits.
49.Pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the
Engineering Division for construction of off-site public works improvements
(LEMCI2.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment
permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy.
Page 7 of 10
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGe \ S OF
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW
FOR A DUPLEX STRUCTURE FOR
TWO (2) SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENCES
LOCATED AT KELLOGG STREET (APN 374-044-007)
GRADING
50.Developer shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from
the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval.
51.Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to any
grading activity.
52.A grading plan stamped/signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer is
required if the sum of the cut and fill in grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the
existing drainage flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the
City Engineer. The grading plan shall show volumes of cut and fill, adequate
contours and/or spot elevations of the existing ground as surveyed by a
licensed surveyor or civil engineer. Contours shall extend to minimum of 15
feet beyond property lines to indicate existing drainage pattern. Apply and
obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to grading permit
Issuance.
53.Provide soils, geology and seismic report, as part of this report address the
requirement of the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. Provide final
soils report showing compliance with recommendations.
54.Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The
applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the
goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage
Area Management Plan.
55.All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and
he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to I for stability and proper erosion
control.
DRAINAGE:
56.0n-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, or accepted by adjacent
property owners by a notarized letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a
drainage easement.
Page 8 of 10
ACENDA ITEM NO. 5
PAGE ) b OF ~ b
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW
FOR A DUPLEX STRUCTURE FOR
TWO (2) SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENCES
LOCATED AT KELLOGG STREET (APN 374-044-007)
57.All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or
shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer.
58.Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street
curb. Roofs shall drain to a landscaped area. Driveways shall be sloped to drain
into landscaping prior to entering street facilities.
59.Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City
Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. Developer shall mitigate any
flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or
diversion of drainage.
FEES:
60.Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34). For each unit
the current traffic mitigation fee is $1,369.00; the current drainage fee is
$490.00 (Town No.3. Dist.) and the current TUMF amount is $9,693.00, the
amount of fees shall be adiusted according to the fee schedule current at the
time of payment.
61.Provide in-lieu payment for future off-site public improvements prior to
building permit. (Res. 86-35) In-lieu payment shall be calculated by
developers' engineer or architect and submitted for city engineers approval. The
estimate shall be based on current cost of street improvements from property
line to centerline of the street within the property limits, plus a 15% added cost
for engineering and construction administration.
STORMW A TERI CLEANW A TER PROTECTION PROGRAM
62.City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and
discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm
water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or
local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing oil,
grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water
Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are
available at City Hall.
Page 9 of 10
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE \1 OF
S
~b
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW
FOR A DUPLEX STRUCTURE FOR
TWO (2) SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENCES
LOCATED AT KELLOGG STREET (APN 374-044-007)
63.PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain
system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or
waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law.
Page 10 of 10
ACENOA ITEM NO.~
PAGe \ 'b OF ot. b .
Notice of Exemption
City of Lake Elsinore
Planning Division
130 S. Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
(909) 674-3124
(909) 471-1419 fax
Filed With: D
Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
Sacramento, CA 95814
!8l
County Clerk of Riverside County
2724 Gateway Drive
Riverside, CA 92507
Project Title:
Minor Design Review for a Duplex with two (2) residential units
Project Location (Specific): The proposed project is located on KeIIogg Street (APN 374-044-007)
Project Location (City): City of Lake Elsinore
Project Location (County): Riverside County
Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project:
This is a proposal to develop a two story duplex building on one (1) 9,148 square foot vacant lot. The duplex includes two (2) 1,651 square
foot residential units with two (2) 590 square foot attached garages. The General Plan designation and Zoning designation is MD, High
Medium Density. The project will provide affordable housing.
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Lake Elsinore
Name of Person / Agency Administrating Project: Linda Miller, Project Planner, City of Lake Elsinore
Exempt Status:
o Ministerial (Section 15073)
o Declared Emergency (Section 15071 (a))
o Emergency Project (Section 15071 (b) and (c))
181 Categorical Exemption (state type and section number): Article 19 Categorical Exemptions
Section 15303, Class 3 (a)
New Construction or Conversion of Sma II Structures
Reasons why project is exempt:
This project meets the exemption requirements pursuant to Section 15303 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Contact Person: Linda M. Miller
Telephone Number: (951) 674-3124 x 209
Signed:
Title: Director of Community Development
Rolfe M. Preisendanz
ACENOA ITEM NO. 5
'AGEr \'\ OF ~ -b -
. --..... -.--
11; t 1
ifl ~!~ ~
~ Ilh ~u
~c.i Iii; ~~.!!
Iii~~ j .al9~~
I' I
1:.1.
ti~'
~ lillf ~
INI
111111111111. ~ ~ t ~ t 11; ~ ~ 1
~I <JI <JI <JI <JI <JI <JI <JI <JI J A ~ I ~ J . c..
~_Jt1___"DtIIll!.1 ______V_____J:l'Io'lIC>___.,_..- ""~...____DUD""___....._JO_~_...........__",.."._~..,___
"""'~.._...........<II.aNl"'*'_.'....._M.....llII....-~_._______JQ_RlO"IlI1___.."....""___,..."""'.."....c_.._ZJ~..........""~_Ql"'l....__.___.,~MJOJWJ_~__""_~~.INI____
'-0- --
Cl
~ ~ ~
I U ~d 21 L J J 5 I
IH~~nUU~~ ~ i
ot<;>1 tUi-\mi!J id
t It ~ T
.~!I
I~!
i~l n ~ u
IIII! Q I! ~ ~ h!~ I n
mllll~lll! Ii II n~
(!) 04..4 * II 800
I
!
Cl . I
'" ~ I
~ ! ~ I i
5 !~!~! ~ ~ I i II ~
~ !hn ~ d ~ I ~ a 51
~ e. 9.!'.."'&~0<D
I I XU~.1
! ~, "'~Q~
; i H!I~~~ Mil,
! ell tofo~ ! I
. I ! ." ...~ i'~'lg
1 I 'I~ .... Itg ~
i Il t iiwi :lbl!
lIDlillil 00 00
! ! i.
1.1 .l~ U lll!i n
~U!~~~I UI.I~ d~~~ ~i
iel1ii:1 ~i.'Ue~iia! ;R
'!,l:::e ~ la~lfh~n h
tinlllo.lo:l ~ ':i "It" ~ ;r
IBl lID
. Xl .1 .
Ie LP .15 ~Ii
~!~I ~!~I i .i~
'I ~ih ~ih I m
i V; I: i ~~:
I. ~U IU. ~;.
moo I!J m 0000
I
i I,
i ! i I ~ Ii! i~
a ~ a ~ ~ i ~ F ~ ~i
! ~ H L H Hp
mOOrn:Jt!Jrn:JOOIBlI!JlIDlID
. !! i
ii I; II! i
dl, ! ,d Ii il i
;i~IIU~b ~
illrnJrnJt!JrnJmrnJl!Irn:J1il
.
: I~
I ~
~ ~
~ Iii ~~
I I' !iH11i
I i ~ I II 1111; Ii
DElElElEIElEl8EIIB
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~\9
I ~ \
I ,. \;'~ ~
I .--_.. '..-- -__
. -r - - - -- -- - -.- - ~.~ -- --F6'~F\"',,~
I p~
""'.-
J. --------"...---------- ----~... ~
--- ~
- I" ~
-.--7/ j ~
. .tf- - ~!$'.?1 <'..~-fi"'''' 't ~ ~ \ \ I
..... ..,y ~.. ~ *,,~ \V ~ !
=fi'.' "Ii . .. -- \ hi
I _" "
- - - .. del
~ .Ii
~--- --- ~
'lr - _ "Z _
-~-y
t - - - - - - - ; ~i,
I ""'.. ~ ,
. ,.;sL-----___
II~
II
-~
5
a.
C)
Z
is
~
C)
~
~
~
:J
w
II:
a.
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
I II !
~ tt,
I aa;
I ~ ~~Io
. l.
~
~
~
I
======-1=~===h=~=:b=
",;\'" ;>Ill;_:'~\'~', f':,jr I:'
S,
_~b .
c~ 'if: 'a.O
lit ,1 Il.11
1m Iii .ei6i .
I i' ~ :'11,.
I.I~ ~i;11 1I1~lli ~
Iii ~ i' ~~9!~ hils
1
11m 1IIIIII11f i ~ a ~ a ~ 1; ~ ~ 1
<l31 <JI <JI <JI <JI <JI <JI <JI <JI I A ~ 1 h ~
.........-_/o~JQ~ _:;IIIl.lUGICI;I______~......____.JO_ ;a/I_~__......_""'____'ZIMlIIIi#:>_..N__.._____IIIl'___
_.._"'_"'-...-_.___...__w_______..o.._zuo....____________""~..,...__.......v.._..__JfJ_..."".-..~....V..._I.._~...='V"':.::'=
Cl
q q is
q! J a ~ I
~B Id;h, ~ ~
In.!~esJH~~ ~I
o 11;)1 tU.Hffi~ ld
l!8 :l; T
III1
;:~I n qU
111i. a i~ ~ ~ h II q i n
unl ~ I~i i I~ II ~ i nq
CD 0 .......... ct (I 800
a
!
~ I !
~ ~ I i j
;? s~i~ l .~. i h i
G a- '. Y 1 8 P i l
~ ~h! W h lid II
~ . . 911'!'. .""'A0<D
I
1 !.
P Ii
~ I J n
~ II iR
I!lIIIIIIOO
113~.l
19id~
i~m~
. -I~
i!i~l~
..i! ,
ill
9,1 !';U!llhn
Inlee~i IUI! ddl ~I
!ih~WI iiiMm in n
~iu'~"": .. S" "" ~ '"
I3l 1!1
. Il~~.!.. .
i ~lid~ i .1 i .1 ~ ~h
. pm~ ~~~, ~~~, ~ ~~l
11 ~~'.n ~~h !~h ~ ~!I
! ~. , ~ ~. ~. j ,~,
l ,:111. ~id lid. m
ill I3l lID 1!1 lID lID
I
I ~~
i ~ i . I I ! ,I
q P i i d ili
~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ I i ~~
illOOlIDl!lIIDlIDIID1!I1!ll!l
~ ! d
~I II Ii l i
di i III II q
l!dBln~l~i~
E] 8]8]8]8]8]8]8] moo
! I
I I I
~ ! ~
i glj !~
! I ~ II! 1111
i I I I 'I gn~
'il~Ji!hhh
OOElElElElElElElm
~
it
~
<I
~
~
~
~
! I
!i II :j ~I II III1 i
!.~ c. ~::;~ ; ~I nunni ~ ~iHJ
.. i ~ - - --. J UliL j k- ~~ill~L1t lit
I
1---- - -.--- ----------- ----..
,
II~
II
-~
5
a..
w
>-
iii
~
~
~
1\
~
~
11m
m~~
~~~u
":::~~=i
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
__ t
- - - - - - ~ lit
I ii ii filii
__ ~ d dim!
" I!h ~~ ~~ I m~~
" '~~i In !n ~mn
, h!! i !s~ i !s~ I ~~m
~
~
~
1\
~
~
\
\
\
I
I
I
I
~
a:
<I
~
9
~
~
A....C..'D!\. rr~"" ,,~o 5
",.:i~ ". ~.'" I" '_
1 ~ t 1 I~!II
~ i~i~ I Elii i"II
til~ i~ ~hli i"II din ...,
1
11, 1 i ~ ~ ~ 1u ~ 1
~I <11 <11 <11 <11 <11 <11 <11 <11 i lid d lD ~
-....-_..,~.rI..... ____~_U't____"""QrJICl___JO_ H___~_~1lI'(IN____j(J__M--"'--____1IO_--
~.""",""",IlQl~_."''''_b J_"''G.-.._._..______'O:O~H1fiH_.,_.._____H__..,~.'''''.__''''__..__JO_alIJQ___GII"f'a'_""'_IlUl~..,.J.l._"""_......,
'_0___
9 9 ~
9 ~ IJ ~I
tH ~d ~I~i ~ is
in.~~eUU0~ ~ I
Dt"ltjji-~m'" ld
1 I Ie ::; T
III1
i~ll n iU
1;11. I i! ~! h II i n
mIl ~ I~i i III! II II!
(!) O....~....~ ll800
I
!
II i I
~ ~ ~ i~i i
~ II ~ ~ la' '
<S hh ~! I I !
~ ~hm ~ h I h U I
:tI · · v., ,. "'L\.4~0@
9 I iUI,1
1 . · ~"'I~
ti' ~~gl'~~ Mh.
i I ~u ~'"~ !t r
~ ~ I !.~ m! H'U
. i 'l,j'''I!R~.
: ~ I i ~!~~~! !m!~
l!lI!lIilOO 00
R ~i! II I ~. I
. ~ .!. "I ;Il.h ,I
" · UI .~ ~Ii'~ !~
~i;I~~1i I~! IHhl~ ~i
haii.:., 'I"UI~H I ~~
!!.I:;;I ! IIn mU d
lRulll~..:I" ~ ot 't ~ ..
00 l!l
~ r ,I .
~ I .p .19 ~Ii
i ~il, ~il. ti 'I!
-I !~!t !~h ~ ; i
~~ l ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~
., ~U .U. J.
moo l!l 00 0000
I
i I.
I ~ I ~ \ I ~;!
3 ~ ! ~ J i ! ~ ~!i
~ ~ ~ III I ; ! If
gOOmImtroOOOOl!lmJoo
. ! I.
i. il Ii! i
di i I! I II q
! ~ ~I s I !s ~ I~ I \
mGJ@J[!]@Jl!l[JOO@JOO
~ ~
I II
~ I i
! an I;
! I' R 1111111
~ ! I -I ~i!~
11~III!hhh
ElEJElElElElElElEll!l
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
~ B ~ · ~ 3'
~ ~
~ - ~
~jl!i Iii
~Ihl "d
I
- Illl
Ii oJ
i . ~ ..,...., I ~~
~ I ,& l'II'lhl 8~
!
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I::
~
~
II~
II
-~
~
w
~
o
S
I
- -- - - - ~ - - ----+- ~~1'l3';t-- oj) -- - - - - ---
1 ill 11.11
~ fi! I Elii ~
.~~ J ll:h .., ~1l! ""Ii
1 ~l
~~~ ! ~! ~i
n~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ i ~ i did i
~ ;1 i ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~
~, ~'~.~'.0"..T..~.
o~ ~~<<<(.(<1-0rhdlllJlhll)lIJUl
11111 II II lilt i ~.~.. ~ 1i ~ J 1
<lll <31 <31 <31 <31 <31 <31 <31 <31 I ~ ~ I ~ I ~
~_,XJ_,6J_ ~_1MII'_""'1.l~___$IO~lWoIJ3f1J/tD___J:>_~_ :WJl'lOlWll~"'_""_UlJD"'___-"","''''''""''.I(}_''''''''__''__~"""",,,~liO___
_.......,_"'..-..-.......,.~_......".''''__Y_iII_'_''.....,'''___..o_.....''''_______........._OII._J(J'''''"'"''''''....s.>>vIU-<lI""......_"'_~JO_""JD___""...""""""_gQj.....,..,..<lKJO''"'.__.....'"''
,_It.,.......",,__
"
I I i1S
I ~I J J ~ ~
tn ~1I~qi . ~ fi
lufi~nHu~~ ~ I
Dt"lrllt-~mi!J lcl
;!! ::; T
I;~I
.liH
j.li n II~
;;II! Q I!!! Idj I H
mil i I!III! II I i III
@ 0 ...~... ~ I' 800
g
,
~ . ~ !
~ ~ i I i
;;l !~I.l ,h I h ;
(J l- 'll . . . Ii.
~ !hn ~ ~ h I ~ d d
d ~ ~ 911'!'. Al>&.Q.0tD
~ i ,I
~ . '
, I iuh~b
\ ~ ! ! ~ ~~~.t! ~
: I ~ il~!~~1i !~Ili!
mromrn rn
i !h !i Ifill ~i
I. !~I .~ l,~.~ ",
nl!'~~ ~~Qi~ hilnl
il~i~.~;nl"ihe9i; i ~i
~! ;1;;;1 ~ h~Ul~ ~n ~i
C~ll'",...o.:l.. . '1" ~ ~
m 00
. li~~,~ .
· '!'~I~ . i. i l"
; JgU , ~ -I ~ -I R lH
i ~'Jm lIb. ~Ib. ~ ,~~
'I ~"m .~it ~~!~ ~ ~~!
i l!I'~l h~~ h~~ i ~~:
l "lI~hr. ~h~ :!if!.; tI ..;11
oom 00 00 moo
I
I ~"
I ! I · ~ ~ '~
! I ! ~ l i I I ! Ii
I 1 II I ~ I ~ f ,@
OOGJOOillOOOOmrnoooo
~ ! I i
~i I; ~q I
Iii ! i! I II q
~ I ~II I ~l ! Ij I ~
0GlI1lmI1lmmmGJoo
~ ~
~ ! ~
~ . ~
~ ~H 1M
I I ~ II! .1 Ii
I I I i~ BI!~
Idld!~~hb
ElElElEJElElElGSGJ
~ ~ '" 1-
.". ". .'-J
@--- - ~
~ en lO: .,VWM
ill- ~ - ~~~
~ iC,- - ~- ---if~--11i- ~-
* llinJ nLJ u u...---.------ ~, 11"'- - h
, , L-J ~ I ! I
---i r ' "
,
t 1"'1 ' J ~! ~
, " ~\ l.~i!; ~ ~! <l
, a;
t ~~ ,
<< ~ ~ =r ~!! . ,
-:- ..:.i, ' G
. m H*{ .~'" I
, I I I I
, I II I ./ t----. ~
.
l 0] T ;==D~cr== om = ~
,
~ I ~ , '"'" ~[H][8 CD!i
. I ~~ : - ~ ~ ~_.!
, ~ la m\~ Jr: ,J
b
, rr;!.i.1l 1 L.-.---F-"<"'7!. .... ~ l
e L_______-I ". 4~~ ~ O!S~
L ..J \. .....:..,j
[;"-;;'!J F4 \:: . ,
~ .0" ,.
,
~ N u"' ,I
" I~ ~ "
, I' ,
I ~I I
~ , ,
I
....
I
~ , ,
I il Ii
, Q, Ii i
~ ~ ~
~ ~- ... ---..-.------
".. ;'6
~ ... ..
it ,. C.
'" Iii"," ~
b l!:- FJ r-------~-'AI t+~..J~ IU~ 1)(
, ",!. -----l._.I,;;;>-- l
. ~~ !i J
! ' (oj I .~ : ~[B3 0; !
~~ " .voc:w ~ ~, ~
fo] *~~ , ~ l
l ~mn~Onm 1Il.~H ;-~
--- -- -- ---
, , 11 HiK II II It ~: ~
! , 1111
~ ~- IIM!I ~ G ~
. s; h i
t LJ !~~ K ~b ,
~ ~~ l' G I
t ;Jjj'
-. " i i
l "
it . f\ 1-- I ~~ ~
m- -11 I r\ n- ~,
'" I -i~ i; -------1
~I ~ -JJ - ~~,
~ ro: ~i~l
~NI\W
- - ~ +
I .~... ,I>-. o.
~ , ~, ~.
~,r;' "(j,,, ---
~-- -----..- ~~
'< " u
II~
II
-.
~
D-
o:
o
9
Ll.
t;
0:
LL
...
",,-.
11; t 1
III fi~ I
10 I~ ~~ill
Iii ~ I ~~g~~
1= I
lijh
AJ liiil ~
UII!
11, 1 i ~ ~ ~lu ~ 1
~I <11 <11 <11 <11 <11 <11 <11 <11 i Aid d Ii <l:
____.10_.10_ ~___~___"'''''''____JlJ_....-ulO ~__M'_""__fIII__P<l_'_"_>>II__Ml_-~--"---
_=-.lIlI\'lllli8tlUlli....,QIIl'Oll.al",__.....OtQ~_._______""_.IlIO....____"_____-.ao_.IO_1IW'.__0l........._AlI__JO_lII/..IO~__..__".___.___...
-.- --
! ! Iii
I ~I J J ~ ~
kn ~d~qi ~ I
iH.~nUu~~ ~ i
o t" I tU.Hm~ I:l
f It ~ l'
lill
;~~I n IU
III;. ~ i! ~! h II ! i U
mllll~i i II h ~ i II!
<!) 04..4 *' II 8 00il
I
!
~ ~ I
~ l ! I i
~ ~~!d ~ ~ I n I i
~ !~n H ~ h ~ i in I
::J t . vt'!,. A6.1A00
B i l~~~.~
l . ~ 8"~1~
i i Inl~~~ Mh.
. I . ,,.h~;ft ~.~I~I~
! "I~ ...~ ft!'~ ~
~ i i i iiwl !~Ili~
I!ilIilIill!l l!l
! I-
~.I .!~ !I II;h ~!
lill~:: ~n g~ Ihl~ ~!
!.li::~! ~l<.dh~i I ~ i~
~J.J;;;l r Ihuh!ll d
~Ru"'.."'I... ~
m I!I ",. ,..
. li~~.l.. .
i i~td~ i .1 i .1 s ~h
!I i~!~n Iii: II;: i in
i ~!I~~~ U~a h~a i 1i~
~ lo_ h~ !!h~ u.g.. .J,
GllID lID lID 0000
I
I Xu
I ! I . i ~ Ii! i~
811'~I!flll
! l lIft ~ I ~ ~ Ii
Gll!lool!ll!ill!llIDI!lmm
~ I d
~r il Ii: i
Iii i I! I II q
I I ~h I !a ! In I
mllIrmllIrmlIDEll!!rmIil
~ l
I I j
\ I ~
I ~li ~!
! ,I I 1;lIdi
i ! I -I ~n!
Illiiilhhh
DElElElSElElElEll!!
I
,
I
,
0)-------+-------
@-------J-
I
,
I
,
I
r::L_ ~ ~
Gr---------t-
~
~ ~ -
- ,
, ,
0L------~-~- . ~
\::::.J I 1-'
I '
i
1 a i
i
S-------t-
@------ '-------
,
I
,
I I I
i i i
0------~-------~-------~----
I I I
i i i
i I i
,
0-------+------- ------ ------
e---------+-
,
I
0-------i- -:
, ~
G---------+-----.J- .
, II ~
,i -J t' i
i
I
o-------i-------
,
I
,
~
~ ~
. .
i~
.
"
il
G-
I
I
~
,
4
b
.
~ -
, -
~ ~ I ~
i ·
II~
!I
-~
~
ll-
l!:
o
9
u.
o
z
o
u
w
<n
J
ACENDA ITEM NO.
PAGe
115 t 1 liBl1 1 ~ f ~ ~ f i f ~
l ri~ ! WI :11 '! ~ ~ < ~ P < q < h
~i~~ ll:h ., ~11i ~ 'e ~!il!!!!!!!!!!!:!!!
l!i 1 12:1 1
~u ~ I ~ ~ I ~ '<t
ii I ,: :z I
<al <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II j Aid d G ~
_.._..""""'at'__",__ ....:=:"..=:="'.:..~~:=..."":.-~-=::.=..~':.=-......==-~:..~.::::::~,::==:""...:.::::::"..=-a::=:::.';.~c:==-::::.-~::~-.::::E
Q
~ ~ i:';
! I JJ ~i
~H ~dehi ~
iUlisnau~~ ~ I
ot"ljU-HIili!J id
l!a ::li T
l~
!III
1'~1 n ! u
1111, Q i! ~! h II! I n
mllll~i i !! h ~ III!
<D 0.........* f 1800
a
~
~ ~ !
~ ~ il i
~ sll, l ! ~ d I ;
() a~ '. ~ I! ~ . I
i? ~hnl d! I h II I
~ . . nw,. ."'''A0<D
'" .
I I iUi,1
1 ~. '. I"~I~
! i ~.ll~~~ MI-
. ~. R ~:. ~~~i i.~UI8
1 I 'I~ .n' Ai'! ~
~ i I i ih;;i HilI!
lIDIillilIil IiI
I I !'
I I Ii . l
B! .1. ~, ~I;!I d
Ihlee~ ~n .IB II ~~~ ~~
i'j m! ~i'lJi~Alh ~~
ll:h:a nl II mil 1b
du~..o.:l ~ ~ 'lI" t ,
ffil m
. li~I,1 ,
· .i'~11 i i I"
i MI n -9 i -9 9 I I
. 1~~!18 lrb, ~Ib, i ~i!
'I ',' , ~!!~ ~ i~ ~ ~U
i i 8 ' I' I' . 'I'
1. !~III! ~id .hl! m
Iil lID lID I!l lID lID
I
I ~"
I 'I · ~ , ;~
! ~ ! I ~ i ~ J. ! li
! I ~ I L H H~
IElffillEllEllElOOffilOOOOOO
. ! I I
II II r II! I
R ~l ~ i~ a i~ i i
! fi ~h I u! in ~
mrm@]ill@]ffiffilmIIDOO
~ ~
I I i
~ i 9
I un ~I
~ I B I l!illl
~ I! I I~ un~
i I ~ I I I I I~ II Ii
OEJElOElElEIElElm
~t ~ ~~ m !
~, bl b, H, ~l~ ~ I
;\ ~I il ~i. ~I ~.,I ~
.. ~I :!I ~ ~l.. 1 I
I i I I i.' I I
I, I
I I I
I,
I I
I!
I
I
i i
i i ;
~i!i .i
~~ ~
~t t
;!.I bl
~I ~ "I
~I;I (I
i i I
i i
i'
I
I
~ "
~I ~I ~I
hi ~I ~I
~I ~I i
t
:i
-1
z
o
~
Gj
...J
W
I
f-
:::J
o
(/l
.J ~I !~ I
B' ~I
.1
~I l:!l ~, ~I b' ~ ~, I
li -I ~I U ~I
~ . .. i
1 i I. 1 IlBIJ
lill I iijl ..,
I. Ii'! ~ i ill .., ~IJi ....,
IiiCl~ If' ~~9~3 hilt
~1
~~~ i ~I ~i
Uhuhtll UHBU
~i ~~~~nh~~~nu~
1!1 1" "12:1 1
ili ! I ~ ~ i ~ l!)
il * i ~ I
<131 <JI <JI <JI <JI <JI <JI <JI <Jj i lid t ~ <(
___"~.oI_ ____~_.._....,....._____L"UfaJ.......__...~ "</,/0...._...._........._...._____.,____....._...____..___
__.._.._",...__;o!___"".__._______JQ.-~M__#t't_____...__JO~llI"_....<lllJllrur_.,...__JQ~H.oI_"~__""_~~~,=""':
'"
~ ~ ii':
I ~aJgl
~H IlId~ij J 5
iHlisnUU~[8J ~ i
o t" I tll-HllIdJ ~
f I!e ::; T
Ii
!III
l.il n 'II
1111. A i~ ~ ~ h II I B
mllll~i i U II i III,
(!) OoA-.......*lI8OO
a
~
~ I I
~ ~ I - i i
;;I 9~ I." ~ l~. d I I
<3 Q' 'a ~ l! p i
~ ~~~Hl d I I ~ H I
~ . . '.9'. .6a~oCD
" .
~ I i!li.l
! . . !"~I~
I i inl~~~ Ml.
. ~ B id;;~8 i~;~I~
~ i ! ~l~I~~~I' .il'~ ~
~ ~ iRhll! !: l!!
I!Irnlil IiI IiI
b I !I: 11111i~ ~I
B. . UI ~~ 'RI'~ ~~
Inl~~: ~pn~ ~I~ ~!
R.n.:~.! ~~'dae!i ~ 5 i2
~1,l":lllh~nllin @D
t u~:i... l' :a ,,'t ~ 't
[g] I!I
· iil!.l . .
i jl~d~ a .1 ~ .1 ft IIi
illi~l.m hi~ hi~ I ~iJ!
! h .ftl IOB~ lo.~ I , .
:i! I,t f:l,- ~h~ ~h~ Il> .. .
0000 I!IooI!lOO
I
I 3.
i i ! ~ ~ ;~
! ! ! ! ~ i i I ! Ii
i ; i I ti ~ i ~ i II
~~~ ft~~~~U
@J[g]mJl!ImJoorororooo
· ! r v
ij tlls!i
;j a I. ! ~I. e
g w r I~ l ,. I ~
1!~!lln3'~I~
0Immmmmmmmoo
~ I
I ! I
~ I
I Sir ~i
I I a n~ nIl
I! I II ~n!
li~llllniih
EJEJSElElElElEJElrnJ
1 t tt n t
" ~, tlll)l b[ ~I :
~I il ~I ~' ~: ii ~i
' J -1
ioi ~I ~ ~I i "
, I' , , il
I
, I ,
, I !- z i
I 0
~
,1- ~ ,
, Ii w I
I , I ~
, Ii
I
,
i I
I,
, i !:
,
I ,
, I ' 1-
~ ~I I, "
, ,
~, hi ~I 'I I, J
1 ~ !I! !I~ i
-. b
i ~' ~:~' ~I~'~'
~I 'I~m
~ ~~ .;~.;
ACENDA ITEM NO.
h
....L
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
TO:
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE:
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PREPARED BY:
JUSTIN CARLSON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
PROJECT TITLE:
INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-01
APPLICANT:
HOWARD P ARSELL/HOW ARD PARSELL
COMPANY: 4854 MAIN STREET, YORBA LINDA,
CA 92886
OWNER:
3RD LAKE PARTNERS, LLC, 32931 BRYANT
STREET, WILDOMAR, CA 92595
PROJECT REQUEST
The applicant is requesting design review consideration for a "tilt-up" pre-cast concrete
industrial building and related on-site improvements pursuant to Chapter 17.56 (M-l
Limited Manufacturing District), Chapter 17. 66 (Parking Requirements), Chapter
17.82 (Design Review), and Chapter 17.38 (Non-Residential Development Standards)
of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC).
BACKGROUND
On February 23,2006 the Design Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the proposed
plans and provided several substantive comments on the proposed architectural design,
building massing and location along the north property line, fencing, and landscaping.
Notably, staff advised the applicant to either ascertain a maintenance easement or set
the building far enough away from the north property line so that the maintenance of
the building could occur without encroaching onto the adjacent property. Although the
applicant disagreed, staff has added a condition of approval requiring the applicant to
ascertain a maintenance easement with the adjacent property owner located along the
north interior property line or relocate the building five-feet (5') off the OIQoeNrO!Y line /
ACENDA1TEM. b
PACE \ OF 35
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. I 2006-01 FOR A
PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT
570 3RD STREET (APN: 377-151-039)
for maintenance purposes prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
The applicant resubmitted plans indicating a revised landscape plan and an
architectural articulation cornice along the elevations visible from 3rd street. In
addition, staff has added a condition of approval stating that the applicant shall submit
elevations for a decorative architectural element to be located on the front (west)
elevation wall directly adjacent to and below the front windows and sign envelope.
This will assist in providing architectural relief along 3rd street.
PROJECT LOCATION
The approximately 1.01 acre vacant site is located on the east side of 3rd Street and
approximately 765-feet south of Collier Avenue. More specifically, the property is
located within the M -1 (Limited Manufacturing) zoning district and has a General Plan
designation of Business Park, Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 377-151-039.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Vacant M -1 Limited Manufacturin ) Business Park
Industrial M-l (Limited Manufacturing) Business Park
Buildin
South Industrial M-l (Limited Manufacturing) Business Park
Buildin
East Industrial M -1 (Limited Manufacturing) Business Park
Buildin
West Industrial M-l (Limited Manufacturing) Business Park
Buildin
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to develop a "tilt-up" industrial building available for lease
on a 1.01 acre parcel. The proposed building will be comprised of two (2) loading
AGENDA ITEM .b
PAGE ~ 0%
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. I 2006-01 FOR A
PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT
570 3RD STREET (APN: 377-151-039)
docks, a 16,580 square-foot warehouse with two (2) grade level loading doors, and
1,995 square-feet of two-story office space. It should be noted that although the office
space will comprise two (2) stories, the developer is only proposing to complete the
"vanilla shell" tenant improvement for the first-floor under this entitlement. The
second story office will be completed as a tenant improvement at a later date.
Siting
The siting of the proposed industrial building will be situated on the northwest comer
ofthe subject parcel. The site plan will meet all applicable development standards and
criteria outlined in the M-l (Limited Manufacturing) zoning district and the Non-
Residential development standards outlined in the LEMC. It should be noted that the
north wall of the building will be located just off of the interior property line.
Circulation and Parking Soace Lavout
The primary access point onsite shall be provided off 3rd street. A main drive aisle,
twenty- five feet (25') in width, extends along the south portion of the subject property
and wraps around to the rear ofthe lot. The purpose ofthe twenty-five foot (25') wide
drive aisle is to accommodate oversized vehicles as well as to comply with all requests
of the Riverside County Fire Department. All parking spaces will be located on either
side of the drive aisle along the rear portion of the lot and along the south end of the
property line. It should be noted that the applicant is providing a five-foot (5') wide
landscaping planter between the south property line and proposed parking spaces.
Architecture
The architectural design ofthe proposed building is a typical industrial contemporary
style. The front (west elevation) facing 3rd street will include an architectural cornice,
two-inch (2") reveal lines, anodized aluminum storefront windows with solar glazing,
and painted concrete panels.
The south elevation will include eight-inch (8") pop-out painted concrete panels, grade
level metal roll-up doors, anodized aluminum storefront windows and doors with solar
AGENDA ITEM ~
PAGE '.:L o~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. I 2006-01 FOR A
PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT
570 3RD STREET (APN: 377-151-039)
glazing, two-inch (2") reveal lines, two (2) below-grade loading docks, and a
architectural cornice that extends a approximately forty-eight feet (48') down the side
of the building from the front elevation.
The east elevation (rear) of the building will include a curb and railing that separates
the parking spaces from the loading docks, accent paint texture, two-inch (2') reveal
lines, and painted concrete panels.
The north elevation includes eight-inch (8") painted concrete pop-out panels, accent
painting, two-inch (2") reveal lines, and painted concrete panels.
Landscaping
Section 17.56.100 of the LEMC requires a minimum of fifteen-feet (15') and an
average of twenty-foot (20') landscaped setback along 3rd street. The applicant is
proposing landscaping in the set back area which will include five (5) Fern Pines, two
(2) Camphor trees, four (4) Crapemyrtle trees, and one (1) American Sweet Gum trees,
thirty-three (33) five (5) gallon Shiny-Leaf Xylosma shrubs, fourteen (14) Yellow
Euryops, eight (8) five (5) gallon New Zealand Flax shrubs, and Tall Fescue Grass. All
landscaping will be permanently irrigated and maintained and will include rain sensors,
which will assist in the conservation of water.
The applicant is also proposing to include a trash enclosure with a solid decorative
roof. To maximize screening opportunities; the applicant is proposing to plant creeping
vines around the enclosure.
Wails and Fences
On the north elevation, the applicant is proposing to use the building as the property
line wall and will construct a new concrete wall approximately six-feet (6') in height
that will connect from the rear ofthe proposed warehouse to the existing retaining wall
located at the rear property.
An existing retaining wall approximately five-to-six feet high runs along the rear
AGENDA(~TEM h
PAGE --=+ OF ~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. I 2006-01 FOR A
PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT
570 3RD STREET (APN: 377-151-039)
portion of the subject property and an existing six-foot (6') high wall connects to the
existing rear lot retaining wall and extends halfway to the front of the property, where
it discontinues. The applicant is proposing to construct a six-foot (6') high wall that
will connect to the existing south property line wall. This new wall will continue
towards the front of the property where it will discontinue approximately eighty-four
(84') from front of the property. The applicant will construct a return wall with a
twenty-four foot (24') wide sliding gate, thus enclosing the rear portion of the subject
property.
Color and Materials
Painted Concrete Wall
Main Color
Painted Concrete Walls
Accent Panels
Painted Concrete Walls
Lower Band
Architectural Cornice
Aluminum Storefront
Windows/doors
Brown
Painted Concrete
Beige
Painted Concrete
Brown
Solar Gray
Stucco/foam
Glass
ANALYSIS
Staffhas reviewed the project and found that with the attached conditions of approval,
the project meets all minimum requirements of Chapter 17.56 (M-l, Limited
Manufacturing District), Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements), Chapter 17.82
(Design Review), and Chapter 17.38 (Non-Residential Development Standards) ofthe
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC).
Siting
The project complies with the onsite parking standards listed in Chapter 17.66 (Parking
Requirements) of the LEMC. Although, the M-l (Limited Manufacturing) zoning
AGENDA ITEM ~
PAGElOF~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. I 2006-01 FOR A
PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT
570 3RD STREET (APN: 377-151-039)
district does not have a minimum lot coverage or minimum FAR section within the
LEMC; the applicant is proposing to have a net lot coverage of approximately thirty-
nine point eight percent (39.8%). Additionally, the project siting complies with all
perimeter setbacks.
Circulation and Parking Space Lavout
The proposed project complies with all required parking spaces as outlined in Chapter
17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the LEMC. The details are shown as follows:
Proposed Building
Office
Warehouse
Sq .Ft.
1,995
16,580
Parking Ratio
1:250
1:500
Total Required
Total Provided
Parking Requirements
8
34
42
42
The project meets the minimum requirements ofthe American Disabilities Act (ADA).
The ADA requires that the project provide one (1) handicapped space for every
twenty-five (25) spaces provided. The applicant has provided a total of forty-two (42)
spaces, of which two (2) will be dedicated for handicap use. Furthermore, the applicant
is proposing two (2) compact parking spaces along the rear of the building, directly
adjacent to the proposed loading docks. It should be noted that the applicant is
providing wheel stops and a guard railing between the parking spaces and the loading
dock pit. As the Planning Commission is aware, the parking ordinance has been
revised to not allow compact stalls; however, the ordinance does not take effect until
October 13,2006.
Architecture and Colors and Materials
The architecture of the proposed industrial building located at 570 3rd Street is
consistent with the existing architecture ofthe buildings within the immediate vicinity.
Furthermore, the proposed colors and materials to be incorporated on the building is
consistent with the objectives and intent of the City of Lake Elsinore's design
guidelines in that it provide an aesthetic quality that lends to the overall achievement of
AGENDA JTEM b
PAGE~OF~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. I 2006-01 FOR A
PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT
570 3RD STREET (APN: 377-151-039)
a well balanced industrial sector.
Landscaping
The minimum landscaping coverage requirement for industrial projects is eight-percent
(8%) as outlined in Section 17.56.100 of the LEMC. the applicant has met this
requirement by proposing approximately 5,190 square-feet or twelve-percent (12%) of
landscaping throughout the site.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15303(c) (New
Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), staff has determined that the
proposed project will not have a significant affect on the environment and shall
therefore be exempt from the provisions of CEQA. Therefore no additional
environmental clearance is necessary.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt; Resolution No. 2006-_
recommending City Council adoption of findings of consistency with the Multi-
Species Habitat Conservation Plan and Resolution No. 2006_ recommending to the
City Council approval ofIndustrial Design Review No. 2006-01 based on the Findings,
Exhibits, and the proposed Conditions of Approval.
PREPARED BY:
JUSTIN CARLSON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
APPROVED BY:
ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ATTACHMENTS:
1. VICINITY MAP
AGENDA ITEM -b
PAGElOF32
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PROJECT TITLE: INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. I 2006-01 FOR A
PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT
570 3RD STREET (APN: 377-151-039)
2. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIONS
3. PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
4. CEQA-CATEGORICAL EXMEMPTION
5. SITE PLAN
6. PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
8. PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN
9. FLOOR PLAN
10. ELEVATIONS
AGENDAJTEM 1-,
PAGE -IL OF ~
VICINITY MAP
INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. 2006-01
~
::f
~
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGEN~~:EM !!{- OF ~')-
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL
OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-01 FOR AN
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING WITH TWO-STORY OFFICES
WHEREAS, Howard Parsell, Howard Parsell Company, has initiated
proceedings for Industrial Design Review No. 2006-01 for the design and
construction of an industrial building with two-story offices and related
improvements located at 570 3rd Street - APN: 377-151-039 (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has
been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City
Council for Design Reviews; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this
item on October 3, 2006.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Project prior to
making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve Industrial Design
Review No. 2006-01.
SECTION 2. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the
Project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, Section 15303 (c), an exemption for new construction or
conversion of small structures.
SECTION 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law and
the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following
findings for the approval of the Industrial Design Review No. 2006-01:
1. The Project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the
intended General Plan and the Zoning District in which the Project will be
located.
ACENDA nSM NO. ~
PACE \'0 OF ''}5 --
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -
PAGE20F3
The Project complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan in that
the approval of the industrial building will assist in achieving development of a
well-balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open
space, recreational and institutional uses as well as encouraging industrial
land uses to diversify Lake Elsinore's economic base.
The General Plan designation for the Project site is Business Park. The primary
purpose of areas designated Business Park is to provide for light industrial,
research and development, support services, and office based firms seeking an
attractive environment and a prestigious location. The land use category
permits a limited amount of business, commercial, and personal services that
directly serve the users and employees of the Business Park and it is intended
that allowed uses and storage of supplies, equipment, or materials will be
contained within an enclosed building.
The zoning designation for the Project site is M-l (Limited Manufacturing). The
intent of the M-l District is to reserve appropriate locations consistent with the
General Plan for certain categories of light industrial uses that are relatively
free of nuisance or hazardous characteristics and to protect these areas from
intrusion by residential, commercial, and other harmonious uses.
2. The Project complies with the design directives contained in the Canyon Creek
"Summerhill" Specific Plan, Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable
provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
The Project is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the
proposed industrial building has been designed in consideration of the size and
shape of the property, thereby creating interest and varying vistas as a person
moves along the street. Further, the Project will complement the quality of
existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive
relationship between the proposed and existing projects in that the
architectural design, color, and materials, and site design proposed evidence a
concern for quality and originality. The industrial building has been designed
to include a twenty-foot (20') front-yard landscaped setback, architectural roof
cornicing, eight-inch (8 '') concrete panel pop-outs, and adequate onsite
landscaping.
The industrial building will be constructed of concrete "tilt-up" walls. The
primary color of the walls will be "white, " the accent pop-out walls will be the
color "brown, " and have a lower band color of "beige." All roll-up doors will
be painted "brown" and the architectural roof cornice will be stuccoed foam
painted "brown." The windows and doors at the front of the building will be
comprised of anodized aluminum with solar glazing in a "solar gray. "
AGENDA ITEM NO. -b
PACE \~ OF 35
~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -
PAGE30F3
3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the proposed Project is not
anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuant to CEQA, the Project, as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable
City divisions, departments and agencies, will not have a significant effect on
the environment and is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303(c), an exemption for new
construction or conversion of small structures.
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code,
including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been
incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of
the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.82.070, the Project has
been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission at
the regularly scheduled meeting of October 3, 2006.
SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of October 2006, by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
ATTEST:
Rolfe M. Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
AGENOA 'TEM NO. . b
PAGE \ ~ OF ;,S
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS
THAT THE PROJECT KNOWN AS INDUSTRIAL DESIGN
REVIEW 2006-01 (I 2006-01) IS CONSISTENT WITH THE MULTI-
SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP)
WHEREAS, Howard Parsell, Howard Parsell Company, has initiated
proceedings for Industrial Design Review No. 2006-01 for the design and
construction of a industrial building with two-story offices with related
improvements located at 570 3rd Street - APN 377-151-039 (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that all discretionary
projects, whether within a criteria cell or not, undergo the Lake Elsinore
Acquisition Process ("LEAP"); however, Projects not within a criteria cell are not
required to complete the Joint Project Review ("JPR"); and
WHEREAS, projects not within a criteria cell need not be evaluated
pursuant to all MSHCP requirements; but, must be evaluated in light of the general
MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements"; and
WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that the City of Lake
Elsinore adopt consistency findings for all Projects demonstrating the Project's
compliance with the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements"; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.82,
requests for industrial design review are discretionary actions to be considered,
reviewed, and approved, conditionally approved or denied by the Lake Elsinore
City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Project is not within an MSHCP criteria cell, but was
evaluated pursuant to the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements"; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal.
Pub. Res. Code 99 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R.
99 15000 et seq.), the Project is categorically exempt from further CEQA review
pursuant to a class 3 categorical exemption for new construction or conversion of
small structures (CEQA Guidelines 9 15303(c)).
WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
AGENC~A \TEM NO. ~
PAGE \~ OF ~S
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE20F4
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this
item on October 3,2006.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Project's
consistency with the MSHCP prior to making a decision to adopt Findings of
Consistency with the MSHCP.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning laws, the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the MSHCP, the Planning Commission makes
the following MSHCP Consistency Findings:
MSHCP CONSISTENCY FINDINGS
1. The Project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City
must make an MSHCP consistency finding before approval.
Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Resolution, the Project is required to be
reviewed for MSHCP consistency, including consistency with other "Plan
Wide Requirements." The proposed Project site is not located within a
MSHCP criteria cell. However, based on requirements of the MSHCP, the
Project was still required to be consistent with Section 6.1.2
Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines and Section 6.3.2
Critical Area Species Survey Area Guidelines.
2. The Project is subject to the City's LEAP and the County's Joint Project
Review processes.
Because the proposed Project is not located within a MSHCP Criteria Cell,
it was not processed through a Joint Project Review.
3. The Project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools
Guidelines.
A site inspection revealed no riparian/riverine areas or vernal pools on the
Project site. Further, the Project site is completely surrounded by existing
development. The Project is therefore consistent with the Riparian/Riverine
ACENDA tTEM NO. (
rw;E 1~ OF ~5
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE30F4
Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines of MSHCP Section 6.1.2. No further
MSHCP action is required.
4. The Project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant
Species Guidelines.
The Project is not subject to the Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines
set forth in Section 6.1.3. No further MSHCP action is required.
5. The Project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures.
The Project is located within the Burrowing Owl Survey Area, and is
therefore subject to Critical Area Species Survey Area Guidelines as set
forth in Section 6.3.2 of the MSHCP. The site was inspected by City Stafffor
the presence of burrowing owls or suitable habitat for this species. No
burrowing owls or suitable habitat are present on the Project site. Further
the Project site is surrounded by existing development. The Project is
therefore consistent with Section 6.3.2 of the MSHCP. No further MSHCP
action is required.
6. The Project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines.
As stated above, the proposed Project is completely surrounded by
development. Therefore, the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines set forth
in Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP are not applicable. No further MSHCP
action is required.
7. The Project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
There are no resources existing on site that would be subject to the
Vegetation Mapping requirements of Section 6.3.1 of the MSHCP. No
further MSHCP action is required.
8. The Project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines.
As stated above, the Project is completely surrounded by development.
Therefore, the Fuels Management Guidelines of Section 6.4 of the MSHCP
are not applicable. No further MSHCP action is required.
9. The Project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local
Development Mitigation Fee.
The Project will be required to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development
Mitigation Fee.
ACENDA'TEM NO. -b
PA<;E \ 5 OF ,,')
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
PAGE40F4
10.The Project is consistent with the MSHCP.
The Project is consistent with all applicable provisions of the MSHCP. No
further MSHCP action is required.
SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of October, 2006,
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Rolfe M. Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
ACENDA ITEM NO. b
PACE \ ~ OF ~ 5
PLANNING
General Conditions:
1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City),
indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Official, Officers, Employees,
and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its
Official, Officers, Employees, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or
annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or
legislative body concerning the commercial project, which action is
bought within the time period provided for in California Government
Code Sections 65009 and/or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code
Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any such
claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully with
the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any such
claim, or proceeding, the Applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to
defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City.
2. Approval for Industrial Design Review No. 2006-01 will lapse and be
void unless building permits are issued within one (1) year following the
date of approval.
3. Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on page one of building
plans submitted to the Building Division Plan Check. All Conditions of
Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
and release of utilities.
4. The applicant shall comply with Section 17.78 (Noise Control) of the
LEMC.
5. All site improvements approved with this request shall be constructed as
indicated on the approved site plan and elevations. Revisions to approved
site plans or building elevations shall be subject to the review of the
Community Development Director.
6. Any alteration or expansion of a project for which there has been a
ACENDA ITEM NO.
PACE \1
b
OF 35
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO.2006-01
Page 2 of 13
"Design Review" approval as well as all applications for modification or
other change in the conditions of approval of a "Design Review" shall be
reviewed according to the provisions of Chapter 17.82 in a similar
manner as a new application.
7. Any revisions to the interior floor plans that could cause the requirement
for additional parking shall be subject to the review and approval of the
Community Development Director or designee.
8. No structure which has received a "Design Review" or "Minor Design
Review" approval shall be occupied or used in any manner or receive a
Certificate of Occupancy until the Director of Community Development
has determined that all Conditions of Approval have been complied with.
8. Plan Check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by
Conditions of Approval, or the Planning Commission/City Council
through subsequent action.
9. All roof mounted or ground support air conditioning units or other
mechanical equipment incidental to development shall be architecturally
screened or shielded by landscaping so that they are not visible from
neighboring property or public streets. Any material covering the roof
equipment shall match the primary wall color.
10. All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site so as
not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets. All light
fixtures shall compliment the architectural style of the building.
11. All loading zones shall be clearly marked with yellow striping and shall
comply with the requirements of the LEMC.
12. Applicant shall comply with all ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act)
requirements.
13. No exterior roof ladders shall be permitted.
14. All exterior downspouts shall be concealed within the building.
Agenda ~
page~Of ')5
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO.2006-01
Page 3 of 13
15. The Planning Division shall approve the location of any construction
trailers utilized during construction. All construction trailers shall require
a cash bond processed through the Planning Division.
16. Materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be
used unless modified by the Director of Community Development or
designee.
17. On-site surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks.
18. Parking stalls shall be double-striped with four-inch (4") lines two feet
(2') apart.
19. All trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standards as approved
by the Community Development Director or Designee prior to issuance
of Certificate of Occupancy.
20. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have a
permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed,
approved by the Planning Division.
21. All parking spaces adjacent to the proposed loading dock shall have
wheel stops.
22. All drive aisles and loading areas shall be kept free and clear of any
materials/merchandise so as to not obstruct onsite circulation and
deliveries.
23. If the applicant proposes an exterior mailbox, he/she shall submit
elevations to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development
director or designee.
24. Split face block shall be used on all proposed walls and shall match the
color of all existing walls.
25. The applicant shall utilize a bio-retention system for NPDES compliance
that shall be fully landscaped.
Agenda 6
Page \\Of~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO.2006-01
Page 4 of 13
26. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to issuance of Certificate
of Occupancy.
27. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall secure a
maintenance agreement with the adjacent property owner located along
the north interior property line. If a maintenance agreement cannot be
ascertained, the applicant shall relocate the building five-feet (5') off the
property line for maintenance purposes.
28. The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to
the project site identifying the approved days and hours of operation and
a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with
the City of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division (951) 674-3124.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit:
29. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permits, the applicant
shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions" form and
shall return the executed original to the Planning Division for inclusion in
the case records.
30. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit
elevations for a decorative solid roof over all trash enclosures. The
decorative solid trash enclosure roof shall be reviewed and approved by
the Community Development Director or designee.
31. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall revise the
landscape plan to indicate that all onsite trees will be a minimum of
twenty- four inch (24") box in size.
32. Prior to the issuance of building permit, the applicant shall revise the
site/landscape plan to indicate that all required parking lot trees shall be
located at the end of all planting beds.
33. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall revise the
site/elevation plan to indicate that the safety railing along the loading
dock extends to the end of the loading dock curbing so that it ends at
grade level.
Agenda ~
page~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO.2006-01
Page 5 of 13
34. The applicant shall incorporate a decorative architectural element to be
located on the front (west) elevation wall directly adjacent to and below
the front windows and sign envelope. All proposed architectural elements
shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development
Director or designee, prior to the issuance of building permits.
35. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit
elevations of the twenty-four foot (24') sliding security gate to be
reviewed by the Community Development director or designee. Chain
link fencing will not be permitted.
36. The applicant shall install a decorative wall return and pilaster that
connects to the sliding twenty-four foot (24') security gate that is visible
from 3 rd street. The wall return elevations are to be reviewed and
approved by the Community Development Director or designee, prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
37. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall revise the
site plan to indicate that all proposed walls are located off the property
line or submit a notarized letter indicating that all adjacent property
owners agree to having the placement of all proposed walls on the
property line.
38. Three (3) sets of the Final Landscaping/Irrigation Detail Plan shall be
submitted, reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect
Consultant and the Community Development Director or designee, prior
to issuance of building permit. A Landscape Plan Check & Inspection
Fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval.
a. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler
system with 100% plant and grass coverage using a combination of
drip and conventional irrigation methods.
b. All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six
inch (6") high and six inch (6") wide concrete curb.
c. Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be
no higher than thirty-six inches (36").
Agenda ,b
Page Q. \Of~
CONDITIONS OF APPROV AI..
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO.2006-01
Page 6 of 13
d. Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the City's Street
Tree List, a maximum of thirty feet (30) apart and at least twenty-
four-inch (24") box in size.
e. Any transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be
indicated on landscape plan and screened as part of the landscaping
plan.
f. Shrubs and vines shall be planted around the onsite trash enclosure
to soften the structure. The landscape and irrigation plan shall be
revised accordingly.
g. The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and
trees and meet all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape
Guidelines. Special attention to the use of Xeriscape or drought
resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to be
used to prevent excessive watering. Thirty percent of shrubs
required on slopes shall be five-gallon container size.
h. All landscape improvements shall be bonded 100% for material
and labor for two years from installation sign-off by the City.
Release of the landscaping bond shall be requested by the applicant
at the end of the required two years with approval/acceptance by
the Landscape Consultant and Community Development Director
or Designee.
1. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within affected
portion of any phase at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is
requested for any building. Final landscape plan must be consistent
with approved site plan.
J. Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details.
39. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance
that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have
been paid.
40. Decorative light fixtures shall be placed within the onsite parking lot. The
fixtures shall be ADA compliant and shall compliment and enhance the
Agenda b
page~f~'
CONDITIONS OF APPROV AI..
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO.2006-01
Page 7 of 13
architectural style of the buildings onsite. The specific fixture type shall
be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director or
designee and shall be shown on the construction drawings.
41. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay park-in-
lieu fee in effect at time of building permit issuance.
42. The Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Fee (MSHCP) shall be due
upon issuance of a building permit.
43. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide
assurances that all requirements of the Riverside County Flood Control
and Water Conservation District have been met.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
General Requirements:
44. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of
development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC)
prior to final map approval.
45. The applicant shall pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees
(LEMC 16.34, Resolution 85-26).
46. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a
"Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable
water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made
for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the
location, such as water pressure and volume etc.
47. All arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power
poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway shall be the responsibility of the
property owner or his agent.
48. The proposed development shall be designed to allow for truck turning
movements on site as well as onto the site. The applicant shall show truck
turning templates on driveways and loading areas. The applicant shall
Agenda h
Page~ofn
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO.2006-01
Page 8 of 13
provide, in writing, approval of fire protection access and facilities as
required by Riverside County Fire Department.
49. The applicant shall pay all fees and meet the requirements of a
encroachment permit issued by the City of Lake Elsinore Engineering
Division for construction of public works improvements (LEMC 12.08
and Resolution 83-78).+
50. All compaction reports, grade certifications (with tie notes delineated on
8 1/2" xlI Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before
final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and
approved.
51. All utilities except electrical over 12 kv shall be placed underground, as
approved by the serving utility.
52. All improvement plans and parcel or tract maps shall be digitized. Prior
to approval of tract or parcel map, and street improvement plans by City
Engineer applicant shall submit digitized files compatible with the City's
Arc Info/GIS or pay $1000 per sheet for city to digitize.
Grading:
53.
54.
55.
The developer/applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for
off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map
approval.
The applicant shall apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate
security prior to any grading activity.
A grading plan stamped/signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer
is required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards and the existing flow
pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. The
grading plan shall show volumes of cut and fill, adequate counters and/or
spot elevations of the existing ground as surveyed by a licensed
surveyor or civil engineer. All contours shall extend to minimum of 15
feet beyond property lines to indicate existing drainage pattern. The
applicant/developer shall apply and obtain a grading permit with
appropriate security prior to grading permit issuance.
Agenda -.b
Page Q ~Of 3.s
CONDITIONS OF APPROV AI..
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO.2006-01
Page 9 of 13
56. The applicant shall provide soils, geology and seismic report, as part of
this report address the requirement of the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Act. The applicant shall provide final soils report showing
compliance with recommendations.
57. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal &
recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for
removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other
rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all
other phases of construction.
58. The applicant is to provide erosion control measures as part of their
grading plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water
quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the
Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan.
59. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical
engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and
proper erosion control.
60. This property is within Zone AO of Temescal Wash, with flood depth of
one to three feet of sheet flow on sloping terrain; the final floor elevation
shall be one foot above potential 100 year flood elevation, which city
recommends to be assumed as 3 feet above the FEMA' s Flood Insurance
Rate Map flood elevation of 1262.
Drainage:
61. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through the site, or
shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City
Engineer.
62. The applicant shall meet all requirements ofLEMC 15.64 regarding
flood hazard regulation.
63. The applicant shall meet all requirements ofLEMC 15.68 regarding
flood plain management
Agenda ~
Page QS of..32
CONDITIONS OF AFPROV AI..
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO.2006-01
Page 10 of 13
64. The applicant shall submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports per
Riverside County Flood Control District for review and approval by City
Engineer. The developer/applicant shall mitigate any flooding and/or
erosion caused by development of site and diversion of drainage.
65. All drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed according to
Riverside County Flood Control District Standards.
66. Storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately stenciled to prevent
illegally dumping in the drain system, the wording and stencil shall be
approved by the City Engineer.
67. The applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a
Notice of Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program with
a storm water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of grading
permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for construction period
and a project-specific WQMP for post construction including its
maintenance implementation. The project-specific WQMP shall
demonstrate that discharge flow rates, velocities, duration, and volume,
for the post construction condition, from a -2-year and 10-year, 24-hour
rainfall event will not cause significant adverse impacts on downstream
erosion and receiving waters, or measures are implemented to mitigate
significant adverse impacts to downstream public facilities and water
bodies.
68. The applicant/developer shall use Site Design BMPs such as minimizing
impervious areas, maximizing permeability, minimizing directly
connected impervious areas, creating reduced or "zero discharge areas,
and conserving natural areas, and allow runoff to sheet-flow through
landscaped swales or natural drainage channels.
69. The applicant/developer shall provide first flush BMP's using the best
available technology that will reduce storm water pollutants prior to
entering into outside street drainage facilities (MS4).
70. The project-specific WQMP shall provide measures to minimize the
impact from the Pollutants of Concern and Hydrologic Conditions of
Concern identified for the Project. Where Pollutants of Concern include
Agenda b
Page ~ ~ of '} S
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO.2006-01
Page 11 of 13
pollutants that are listed as causing or contributing to impairments of
Receiving Waters, BMPs must be selected so that the project does not
cause or contribute to an exceedance of water quality objectives. The
WQMP shall incorporate the applicable Source Control, and treatment
Control BMPs as described in the Santa Ana River Region WQMP and
provide information regarding design considerations, and the long-term
operation and maintenance requirements for BMPs requiring long-term
maintenance, as well as the mechanism for funding the long-term
operation and maintenance of the BMPs requiring long-term
maintenance.
71. Prior to issuance of any building or grading permits, the property owner
shall record a "Covenant and Agreement" with the County-Clerk
Recorder to inform future property owners of the requirement to
implement the approved project-specific WQMP. The project applicant
shall cause the approved final project-specific WQMP to be incorporated
by reference or attached to the project's Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan as the Post-Construction Management Plan.
72. Education guidelines for Water Quality Management Practices (WQMP)
shall be provided to the tenants, operators and owners of the businesses
of the development, regarding the environmental awareness on good
housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water
quality and meet the goals of the WQMP in the Riverside County
NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan.
73. Prior to building permit close-out or the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy or certificate of use, the applicant shall:
A- Demonstrate that all structural BMPs described in the project-specific
WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with
approved plans and specifications;
B- Demonstrate that applicant is prepared to implement all non-structural
BMPs described in the approved project-specific WQMP; and
C- Demonstrate that an adequate number of copies of the approved
project-specific WQMP are available for the future owners/occupants.
Agenda ~
page~Of~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO.2006-01
Page U of 13
74. The applicant/developer shall pay Master Planned Drainage fees of
$7,155.00 per gross acre of the lots, a total of $7,226 (Third Street
District. )
Street Improvements:
75. The street shall be improved from property line to the existing curb
within the limits of the property's frontage on Third Street. The
improvements shall include parkway landscaping as required by city
engmeer.
76. The developer/applicant shall pay all fees and meet requirements of
encroachment permit issued by the City of Lake Elsinore Engineering
Division for construction of public works improvements (LEMC 12.08
and Resolution 83-78).
77. All compaction reports, grade certifications shall be submitted to the
Engineering Division before final inspection of public works
improvements will be scheduled and approved.
Fees:
78. The developer/applicant shall pay all Capital Improvement and Plan
Check fees (LEMC 16.34). Pay Master Drainage Fee, prior to issuance of
grading permit and TIF and TUMF and Kangaroo Rat Fee fees prior to
issuance of building permit, the following is the current fee schedule:
Master Drainage Plan Fee for Third Street District is ($7,155.00
per acre.)
The TIF amount is $0.81 per square foot of building;
TUMF amount is $1.58 per square foot of building;
Kangaroo Rat Fee is ( $500.00 per acre x 1.01 acre) $505.00
The amount of fees shall be per schedule of fees in effect at the time the
payment is made.
Agenda h
Page ?10f ~S
CONDITIONS OF APPROV AI..
COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW NO.2006-01
Page 13 of 13
LAKE ELSINORE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
79. Pursuant to AB 2926, AB 1600 and AB 181 the Lake Elsinore Unified
School District would require payment, by the owner (or developer), of
the maximum allowable commercial/industrial school fee prior to the
issuance of a certificate of compliance.
LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
80. The developer is to pay park fees of $0.10 per square-foot for all interior
commercial/industrial space.
81. The developer is to comply with all NPDES storm water requirements.
82. The developer will be required to participate in the "Public Facility" fee
program.
83. The developer is to maintain all exterior walls and landscaping.
84. The developer is to participate in the City-wide LLMD.
85. The developer is to comply with all City Ordinances regarding
construction debris removal and recycling as per Section 8.32 of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code.
86. The City's Landscape Architect IS to reVIew all landscape and/or
irrigation plans.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTIRCT
87. An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related
activities occurring within District right-of-ways or facilities. For further
information, contact the District's encroachment permit section at (951)
955-1266. (Third Street Channel)
ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
88. The applicant shall request a will serve letter for the service of water and
sewer.
Agenda b
Page Q'\ of )5
Notice of Exemption
City of Lake Elsinore
Planning Division
130 S. Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
(951) 471-1419 fax
Filed With: D
Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
Sacramento,()\ 95814
IRI
County Oerk of Riverside County
2724 Gateway Drive
Riverside, ()\ 92507
Project Title:
Industrial Design Review No. I 2006-01
Project Location (Specific): The proposed project is located on the east side of 3rd Street and approximately 765-feet south of Collier Street
at 570 3rd Street (APN: 377-151-039). More specifically, the property is located within the M-l (Limited
Manufacturing) zoning district and has a General Plan designation of Business Park.
Project Location (Gt}J: Gtyof Lake Elsinore
Project Location (Count}J: Riverside County
Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project:
The applicant is proposing to develop a "tilt-up" industrial building available for lease on 44,168 square-foot or 1.01 acre parcel. The
proposed building will be comprised of two (2) loading docks, a 16,580 square-foot warehouse with two (2) grade-level loading doors, and
1,995 square-feet of two-story office space. The proposed project will have a net lot coverage of approximately thirty-nine point eight
percent (39.8%).
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: Gty of Lake Elsinore
Name of Person / Agency Administrating Project: Justin Carlson, Associate Planner, Gty of Lake Elsinore
Exempt Status:
D Ministerial (Section 15073)
D Declared Emergency (Section 15071 (a))
D Emergency Project (Section 15071 (b) and (c))
[8] Categorical Exemption (state t}pe and section number):
Article 19 Categorical Exemptions
Section 15303, Oass 3 (c)
New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures
Reasons why project is exempt:
This project meets the requirements pursuant to Section 15303 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Contact Person: Justin Carlson, Associate Planner
Telephone Number: (951) 674-3124 x 295
Signed:
Tide: Director of Communi1;y Development
Rolfe M Preisendanz
ACENDA ITEM NO. ~ 5
PAGE_ ~O _Of
L - (vlL) , l3l.
S;6S;Z6 'to '2:!'9"I^IOO1IM
'1.S 1.N't J..2i8 1€6Z€
'O'l'l 'S2i3NUI'td 3>l'1l 02i€ '<:I3NMO
.ZI
I
I
I
, '"
I ' ~
I ~
I~~ ~ I
illl I
:1
~
lit g,
~ I I
I : I ,:
i~~ I ~
I >-
1 ~
I
I
I z
C
Q.
!::
U)
@Jc:!J~'E; H
o c:!J. ~..
~ ~ ~ ,~,n ~ 1!1
~ (ifiJ @, ~~~ ma~i I!
~ @:5 ~ ~2';;. ~~~, ~-
@ ~ @ ~]~ ~i!g II
25 @, @ ~1:~ hEE ~~
:~ ~
"'~ ~
~ i! ~ ~
9r~, t" ~
:i 0 ~.:.:.: ~
;z ~~~~~
Q.. ~ - 10 10
~ ~ ~
: I
~ ~"!
z ii: :~
>() III ai ~~
'"
Ii! I
· i; ~ -
.. !" :i ll' _ ~
I ~I!I: ~
II -I_il
!!~ I II I
~
~ ~
~ I
i ~ ~ i -i
! I!i !! ,:! II! !.I -I
E ~g~ ~g~ ~~~ ~~~ m~~ ~~
<I ~~ ~
.; ; , ,H i
Sl':' ~ m 15 ~
~. :(
d ~ ~ ;~
., . l!l
~ ~ 2 ~Hl
..;.~ 2 . ~i
~ i
i 1.1 i!
i it I ;3
'tIN2iO:::lI"'lV'O '32:!ONISl3 3>1'tl 0-
1.332:I1.S 02i€ OLS; 0-
.0.'.' 'SY::JN.LYYd ::J)lY' aye 0-
. 2:!0::l e)N1011nE1 l'tI2il.Sn<:JN1 M3N 't
NY'd il.Llt
,
.,r.'
,
'i g
'" "
Ii ~I
i; II
I. r
~! ~
nil!
;" Ii
~i i
i~1 ~
- .-
~
~ ~
2
2
~
~
&S
B
is 'eo-e 1'VIaJ.SI1CN ,;asn .lNaCM"0'v' ~ ~
~I~~ ~.~
~ ~d @~~
~
.
B
~
C_--~~~-~-~-~-~-~-7
i~ ACE~~lffo. b
I~ 'eo-e 1'VIaJ.SI1CN ,;asn W30'1r~ACE I) \ OF)S
n
@c!J~
@5c!J~
~~~
~@jlj@,
~@5~
@~@
~@,@
r ; 1~
. .. .
~.. Iii ~ ]l,r
ti ~ll~i l~
0" ~~n ..g
~~ 2~~~ -
S~ ~~i~ U
1'10 'Qb6 <'"
~IU
mn
WI
S N 0 f S I ^ J l:!
G6L 9-9€6 Will '131
G6Gl6 '10 '~'1V110a1IM
'lS 1N'1 ,l.~8 1€6l€
'0"'-1 'S~3N1~'1d 3>1'11 a~
JHtiIHU. i.jJ~jn:
ffll!I!JjjjIJfJ~IjJii .
~ n 8 g M . W n I ~ . I I I . . . . . . . a \
~ W:~~~~~m~~~0t~iB~ti~~ \
I .I
it ~ 1=1
t~1 ~r~ll i
I i I I I ! i~ I i ~ 11 I
ll'l.E ~JJl J
j~i!!~~!i~.]i
j j J I I j j j j j j ] J
0888GG00G@@@@
r\'i
rw
r-II
'11~O:::lI1'18 '3Cj()NjS13 3)1'11 0-
133&8 ~ 0-
'0"" 'SY3NUIYd 3)1'1' Ol::le, 0-
, ~O:::l $NI01InB WI~lSnCJNI M3'J "<t
NY1d ONIOYlIO AlIYNllIl1li1l:1d
D
...
(,)
L
8
'"
'(j3NMO
H~ ~
- t t
W ,,~.
\-o.s:~
~ -'. ~Z Iii
:> .'.. l- 21l'
~. l-jt
~ 01.L1:
G'.
a:
Q.
2
~
~
&l
I ,
r ~~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
~I
gi
~
g tg..,
z
CC
...
Q.
CJ
~
'll
~
i
)
c
CC
a:
CJ
>
a:
CC
!
::i
:i
'+'%s..:>'
U;IIUS aHe
AGHmA ITEM NO, b
PAGE .,?- OF 35
@ d ~.f I 1~
o d 2;: 4.0
@5 [\!!J] ~ ,E ~ Iii ~ 'G'I
~ I!!iiJ @, ~!! ~lln Ig
~ @5 ~ 30'- ~fH '5
@ ~ @ H! :i~~~ n
25 @1 @ ~~:~ hEE :~
S N 0 I S I ^ 3 l:l
<;6L9- (vlLl '13.i
gc,9Z:6 "10 '~I^J001IM
'.is .iN'V,A,2:18 1€6z:€
'0'1'1 'S2l3Nl.2:l'V d 3>1"11 02:l€ '2:l3NMO
Hili 2 i
1111 i i; i
~ Hll~ HnH } ta~
!! ~ II ;:; ~ i'
n ,~n
IhlU
@@G)@e0 .
: ~ a
~"'-"-'II
~ :mr ~~ "
~""'-~<
~;:;~~::::~"
~''''''~ll
~
b~
!I
!,
~i
iii
II
I,'
II
, .i
Iii
,I
I h!
il .~
;;1
II;
i i!
" ..
'V1N2:l0:::l11'V0 '32:lONIS13 3>1"11 0'>
.i332:l.LS 02:l€ OL 9 0-
'0"" 'SYiN.LYVd i>lV' aye 0-
J 00:::1 ~1011118 1'VI2:l.LsnCNI M3N '<t
NY'd idYOSQNY' AtlYNIWl1itld
D:i~
8 *
)~
~ 0 ~
'ecna ~ '3Sl1 .L.NaO"trCl'O'
I
I
I
I
I
~ I
I !
~ ~!
~ ~i
\1 I
I
I
I
I
I
0' --
I ~ ~ Ih I
i ; i ;;1 I n Ii I i I! I
ill h I ~
~lilllihlllllllllil
z
~ I
I:L
I 0~O
~
~
-- ~-- - ---n--- -~- -t- .L33H.LSOH& .. --
'e>cn3 ~91CN ,asn .LN:iIO"'tI"'O"cf
AGENDA liEM NO, ,
PACE ~') OF 5S
~z ~
2
~
~
D\
~
I z
~ ~
Q.
I ~
c(
U)
Q
Z
c(
.....
>-
IX
c(
z
i
:i
UJ
IX
@d~
@5d~
~Q11!]E\
~(01)@,
~@5~
@~@
25@,@
.[ ; H
: ~'i
.~ go ~ ~ Jl
n ~<llll .~
-< ~7~ '0"
HhH -
hih~U
h~
Baa
ij~
2l!\i
~ Z
-c
I -J
.J I Q,
I I
I a:
I
I 0
I t I
ij..~ -J
j I LL
j"i .", I
~ ~ I
I
I
I ~
..Li, ',.) I 00..' f
~ .I-.SIP .S-,II .S".II ~
.9-.~~ OF
S NOli :3 l:l
L eVIL) 'l3.l
ge,g~6 '10 '2:l'VINOOlIM
'lS .LN'V.l.2:l8 1€6Z€
'O',l 'S2:l3Nl.2:l'V d 3>I'Vl 02:l€
'VIN2:l0::lIl'VO '32:lONISl3 3>I'Vl 0-
1332:llS 02:l€ OL g 0-
'0"" 'SH3N.LHVd 3>1V' aHt 0-
. 2:l0::l elNI011n8 l'V12:l1SnaNI M3N ""
NY1d 11001:1
'2:l3NMO
_.~. .._---_.:::....._-----~_._._+-~._.:-.':..._...._+.
. I
i I
i
i
I
I
I
I
.~--_......._+-
I
I "
i ~
!
"\
I ~
~
Di~
Hn
~z ~
2
<!<
~
i;\
@ c:!J ~ l I H II'i1I -~ '1IN2:lOdl1'10 '3ooN1813 3>1'11 CII
@5 c:!J cs: I ~'i fI'iIl 0>
.,~~ MI ~p -- I'MI 133<:118 Q($ OL9 4l(
0> 0
; @Ii) @1 ~~~ g~, '~ S N 0 I S I ^ 3 l:I '0"" 'SI::I3N.Lt:IYd 3>1Y' 01::1& L
9bL9-9B6 (vlLl '131. 0>
@5 ~ te'iJ> ~~'? 1;~ 969<1:6 '10 '~'1V1100llM , 00::1 elNIOllnS l'11~SnONI M:3N "<t 8
@ ~ @ it~ ~g!~ '18 IN'1A2:l8 It:6Z;~ 0.
8 @, @ ~~:~ i 55 ~~ '0'1'1 '82:l:3Nl2:l'1 d 3>1'11 0($ '~3NMO SNOIJ. Y All,.. ~ (, "
I -- I I
III I
,
Ii I I
I
I ,
r L1 I
~I I
~B
S
a
~ I
. I
I ']'
I '. I
ft II I
r I II
~; I
~B! I +-r-
i -
I I
II I
j
I
r
-
I
,
"
r
I I
,
I
I I
,
Ii
I
I
~
~
2
z
I, 0
-
~ ' I I- ~
II e(
~ I > ~
W
....
2 I I w 2
!!? l- ii !!?
en
~ w I ~
~
z I I z
0 0
i= I -
I l-
e( e(
> >
W W
.... ...I
W W
::I: ~ ::I:
l- I-
a: ~ ::)
0 0
z en
2
!!?
~
z
o
i=
e(
>
W
....
W
I-
U)
e(
W
!!?
~
t,i) b
Ac;ENDA lieA NO,
PAGE 3S OF ).S
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
TO:
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DA TE:
OCTOBER 3, 2006
PREPARED BY:
TOM WEINER, PLANNING MANAGER
TITLE:
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECCESSITY (PCN)
NOTIFICATION TO STATE DEPARTMENT OF
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL FOR THE
TARGET STORE LOCATED AT 18287 COLLIER
AVENUE (OAK GROVE SHOPPING CENTER)
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
On March I, 2005, the Planning Commission recommended approval of entitlements
for the Oak Grove Commercial Shopping Center located on the northwest comer of
Central and Collier Avenues. The establishment of a Target retail store within the
commercial center was included as part of the approvals.
The State of California Business and Professions Code mandates that off-premise
alcohol sales establishments that are located within a census tract that is over
concentrated with similar alcohol related uses obtain a Public Convenience and
Necessity (PCN) finding from the local jurisdiction. The Target store is currently
located in a census tract which contains seven (7) off-premise alcohol establishment
licenses. State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control guidelines only allows for
two (2) off-premise alcohol establishments within this census tract.
Typically, the PCN findings are reflected within an approved resolution. However,
since this type of alcohol related use (drug store) does not require a Conditional Use
Permit or other type of entitlement, a resolution containing a finding of Public
Convenience and Necessity was never generated. In turn, in order for Target to sell
beer and wine, a letter indicating that the local jurisdiction has no objections based on
the finding of public convenience and necessity is warranted.
1
ACENDA lTEM NO...~_ - r-
~~ \ OF S
PA~_ 1 - _J
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
July 18, 2006
DISCUSSION ITEM: TARGET PCN
Upon concurrence of the Planning Commission and signature of the Chairman, the
PCN letter (attached) will be forwarded to ABC for processing.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve and sign letter of Public Convenience and Necessity.
PREPARED BY:
TOM WEINER, PLANING MANAGER
APPROVED BY:
~
ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ATTACHMENTS:
1. PCN letter addressed to ABC
2. Letter from Hinman and Carmichael, LLP requesting PCN
notification to ABC
AGENDMTEM J.
PAGE~OFS=
CITY OF ~
LAKJ: ,6,LSiNO~
~ DREAM E,XTREME
October 4, 2006
California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
Attn: Investigator Vickie Elliot
3737 Main Street, Suite 900
Riverside, CA 92501
RE: Public Convenience and Necessity Letter for Target, 18287 Collier Avenue,
Lake Elsinore CA 92530
Dear ABC Official:
MAYOR
This letter is in reference to a Type 20 off-premise beer and wine license
proposed for the Target store at the location listed above. Pu
23958.4 of the Business and Professions Code, prior
alcoholic beverage license, the City is required to
whether the establishment seeking the license
and necessity.
or related issues, please contact
124.
ROBERT E. MAGEE
ROBERT SCHIFFNER
MAYOR PRO TEM
The Riverside County Sheriff Departm
and does not object to the issuan
recommending approval of the off-
on the finding of public convenien
DARYL HICKMAN
COUNCILMAN
If you need further information
Tom Weiner, Planning Mana
GENIE KELLEY
Sincerely,
COUNCILWOMAN
THOMAS BUCKLEY
COUNCILMAN
Michael O'Neal
Chairperson, City of Lake
ROBERT A. BRADY ~
-'-
CITY MANAGER
Rolfe Preisendanz
Director of Communit~
951.674.3124
130 S. MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530
7
ACENOA'iE" NO,-=, ~
~ Of
pAot:~...=
WWW.LAKE-ELSINORE.oRG
260 CALIFORNIA STREET. SUITE 1001 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 TEL: 415.362.1215 FAX: 415.362.1494
August 24, 2006
By Mail and Facsimile: (951) 471-1419
Tom Weiner
Planning Manager
Community Development Department
City of Lake Elsinore
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, California 92530
Re: Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity
Target Corporation, Target 18287 Collier Ave., Lake Elsinore
Dear Mr. Weiner:
Our client, Target Corporation, has applied for a Type 20 off-sale beer and wine license to
sell alcoholic beverages at its new store at 18287 Collier Ave., in Lake Elsinore. Because
the store is located in a census tract that has an "undue concentration" of off-sale licenses
under Section 23958.4 of the Business and Professions Code, Target is requesting a
determination that public convenience or necessity will be served by issuance of the
license. The following is an explanation of Target's intended operations.
The Target store will be the anchor tenant in the new Oak Grove Crossing Shopping Center
opening in October. The Target store will include an expanded market section, along with
the broad range of general merchandise products that customers have come to expect at a
Target store. The beer and wine will be displayed in the market section, along with the
other food and beverage products that Target sells. Adding beer and wine sales will offer
customers a more complete shopping experience and will provide a convenience to
Target's customers by eliminating the need for an additional shopping trip.
Target understands the responsibilities that come with selling alcoholic beverages and has
developed an extensive training program for store managers, trainers and cashiers who
handle alcohol sales. The training focuses on cashier responsibilities in preventing
underage sales, methods for verifying identification, handling intoxicated guests and cashier
liability. Target also has age verification technology built into its point of sale system to
further assist employees in preventing underage sales.
OF
Tom Weiner
Planning Manager .
August 24, 2006
Page 2
For the reasons set forth, we are requesting that the city make a finding that the licensing of
the new Target store with a Type 20 off-sale beer and wine license will serve public
convenience or necessity. If you have any questions about Target's proposed operations,
please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
lxftk A1J w-2.-1J6
Beth Aboulafia
1
ACENI)A tTEM NO.
PACE ~ _OF S