The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01-07-1985 SSMINUTES JOINT STUDY SESSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, JANUARY 7, 1985 CALL TO ORDER The Joint Studv Session of the City Council and Planning Commission was called to order by Mayor Valenzuela at 6:30 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE VERMILLION, VA'LENZUELA COMt4ISSI0NERS: DOMINGUEZ, MELLINGER, SAATHOFF, WASHBURN ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNHART Also persent were: City Manager Molendyk, Community Development Director Corcoran, Planners Coleman and Miner and City Clerk Money. TITLE 17 - ZONING Mr. Corcoran stated that this session was for the purpose of reviewing proposed revisions to Title 17 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code regarding zoning. Lengthy discussion followed regarding various chapters of the zoning code. Consensus was to make the following corrections and revisions: 1. Section 17.02.045 Area, Net. C. Correct typographical error - delete second "public" in first sentence. 2. Section 17.330 Recreational Vehicle. "Recreational vehicle" means a camper, motor home, travel trailer or tent trailer, with or without motor power, designed for human habitation for recreational or emergency occupancy, with a living area as defined by California State Code, Title 25. 3. Section 17.02.335 Service station. Delete the words "automobile repairs" in sixt ine. Add definitions for "Automotive Garage" and "Self-Service Station". 4. Section 17.02.340 Used. -DELETE. 5. Section 17.02.345 Visual obstruction. "Visual obstruction" means any combination of fencing, hedges, trees, shrubs, walls, signs, billboards and any other objects which limit the visibility of persons at intersecting or intercepting streets and alleys between three feet and ten feet above the ground measured in a vertical plane of the sidewalk area. 6. Section 17.02. - Add Sections defining Redevelopment Agency (RDA) and Public Safety Commission. 7. Section 17.03.020 Suitability of re ulations. Add the wording "and Planning Commission after t e words City Counci 'in first sentence. 8. Section 17.06.020 Criteria. F. Delete the words "only reasonable". 9:. Section 17.07.020 Criteria. C. Include catch-all phrase in Exceptions--for "roof pitch". 10. Section 17.07.030 - Permitted Uses. G. Pets - Second paragraph - Correct typographical error - "unduly" Page two Joint Study Session Minutes January 7, 1985 11. Section 17.07.040 - Development Standards. D. Lot Width - Add the following sentence: "Other provisions of this title not withstanding, any lot which existed prior to December 23, 1953, may be used as a building site for one-single-family dwelling, provided that the dwelling has eight-hundred-fifty (850) square feet of floor area:" 12. Section 17.07.040 - Development Standards. H. Building Setbacks. 3. Rear Yard - Second paragraph - Add: "Patio cannot exceed forty (40) percent of rear yard with fifteen foot (15') minimum setback." 3. Flag Lots - Third paragraph - DELETE. 13. Section 17.08.030 - Permitted Uses. H. 1. DELETE the word "unlighted" in first sentence, and delete from all sections in residential, referring to signs. 14. Section 17.09.060 - Development Standards. G. Parking - (Visitor Parking) - Add: "One additional space for every three units." 15. TV Satellite Dishes - Staff was directed to establish criteria for placement and inc ude if not already addressed in another section. 16. Section 17.11.040 - Building Height and Area. A. 2. Amend to read: "A mobilehome shall have a minimum. livable floor area of not less than eight-hundred-fifty (850) square feet." Set Study Session Consensus: Schedule another Joint Study Session to continue review of proposed revisions to Title 17, beginning with Section 17.12, for Wednesday, January 16, 1985 at 6:30 p.m. Adjournment The Joint Study Session of the Planning Commission and City .Council of the City of Lake Elsinore was adjuourned at 9:00 p.m. G'~ ~U R A VALENZUELA, OR CITY OF LAKE ELS RE Respectively submitted, o Ann oney, C ty C erk MINUTES REDEVELOPMENT/COUNCIL STUDY SESSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, JANUARY 10, 1985 CALL TO ORDER The Study Session of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency was called to order by Mayor Valenzuela at 6:31 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Matson. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: MATSOfV STRIGOTTE, VERMILLION, VALENZUELA ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT (Councilman Knight arrived at 6:44 p.m.) Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, RDA Administrator Modesti and City Clerk Money. BUSINESS MATTERS I. Goals and Objectives - Redevelopment Agency Mr. Molendyk stated the purpose of this meeting is to determine if all are in agreement regarding the direction we are headed and the steps necessary to arrive there. He introduced Mr. Wayne Wedin, Economic Consultant, who has been retained to prepare a redevelopment plan for the City of Lake Elsinore. Mr. Wedin commented that every community is unique and each has different goals and objectives. These need to be addressed and analyzed before pro- ceeding any further with the redevelopment study. He outlined some prelim- inary steps which he recommends be followed in order for development to proceed in a logical and businesslike manner. 1) Strengthen relations with other public agencies. 2) Determine community strengths and weaknesses. 3) Determine our market position and where the community fits in. This will require a separate study and he recommended Al Gobar be retained to prepare this market study. 4) Staff must research and determine what properties are available for development, who owns the property and what the value is. 5) Identify the type of industry we should be competing for and criteria for providing assistance to developers and projects. 6) Establish mechanism to attract industry and develop promotional materials. 7) Establish mechanism to generate income which we are not now realizing. He suggested the City set up a non-profit purchasing corporation which would represent our interests and over which the City would have some control. The corporation would purchase building materials, using a re-sale number-and avoiding payment of sales tax. Contractors who normally purchase building materials elsewhere would be encouraged to purchase from the corporation, thus generating sales tax revenue to the City. Contractors could be given incentive to purchase through the corporation by offering to reimburse a portion of the sales tax to them. Mr. Molendyk added that the non-profit status would provide the City with the flexibility to accept donations of park lands, publication of a City newsletter and allow joint purchasing with other agencies. Page two RDA/Council Study Session January 10, 1985 I. Goals and Objectives - Continued. 7) Continued. Mr. Wedin explained that once the concept is approved, formation of the Corporation would be relatively simple and could be accomplished in approximately two weeks. 8) Continue to pursue grants and lend support in efforts to obtain Federal grants for lake management and regional sewer planning. Group discussion followed on various aspects of the recommendations. Mr. Wedin concluded by stating that,~based on tonights discussion, he should be prepared to present a report to Council early in February, out- lining specific costs and time schedules. He estimated two to four months to have the plan in place. At that time, he suggested the City host a VIP briefing, invite County and State officials and inform them what is going on in our community and solicit their support. II. Council Discussion Items Workino Relationshi Consensus was that there is a need for better communication between Councilmembers. Need to make a better effort to work as a team. 2. Policy Consensus was to appoint a committee consisting of Mayor Valenzuela, Councilman Knight, Ron Molendyk and Jo Ann Money to review and prepare a document establishing policy and procedure for City Council. 3. Agenda City Manager and City Clerk to review alternate formats for the agenda. 4. Travel and Training Council expressed their individual views regarding training seminars and conferences. It was agreed that many of these programs can be addressed and funds allocated at budget time. Some should be attended by the entire Council, while others might require individual Councilmember attendance. It was suggested that travel requests appear on the agenda for approval and, when an individual member attends, a report should be submitted following the conference, so that entire Council can share information. Consensus was to direct the committee established to review Council policies and procedures to also review and prepare a travel and training policy. 5. Emergency Procedures Consensus was to issue the City Manager, as Disaster Coordinator, keys to City offices and facilities, excepting the Finance Department. Council requested this be placed on the January 22,1985 agenda for official Council action. 6. Council Benefits City Clerk was directed to research new legislation regarding Council compensation and to prepare a report on current Council benefits. Page three RDA/Council Study Session January 10, 1985 III. Council/Manager Relations Mr. Molendyk expressed his views on the Council/Manager relationship. He stated that Council sets policy and Manager needs full authority to implement those policies. He encouraged Council to relate all problems and discuss priorities with him. Must have regular communication to insure good working relationship. He commented that he is available twenty-four hours a day. IV. Council/Manager Goals Mr. Molendyk reviewed a list of goals which, after many discussions with individual Councilmembers, he feels are top priority. 1. Lake Management 2. Economic Development 3. Image 4. City Hall 5. Personnel/Management 6. Intergovernmental Relations 7. Community Master Planning 8. Public Safety Lengthy discussion followed regarding priority of these goals. Mr. Knight commented on the 'Employee-of-the-Month' awards. He suggested this become a quarterly award in 1985, presented every three months. Also, it was suggested that Council not be involved in the selections but should leave this up to staff. Consensus was to direct staff, Personnel Director and Manager to establish a procedure regarding employee awards. COUNCIL COMMENTS It was agreed that we need to schedule more meetings of this type. Council needs to attend more community functions and represent the City. It was suggested that Council be notified regularly when new business licenses are issued. Mr. Molendyk agreed to include "dates to remember" in the weekly information memorandum. Mr. Matson suggested each Councilmember list their five top priority items and another meeting should be scheduled in two to three weeks to discuss. Mr. Molendyk commented that once the priority list is established, he can plan the realistic time line needed so Council can anticipate completion dates. Council concurred to set a definite meeting date and adjourn the regular City Council meeting on January 22, to the date determined for this meeting, so that decisions could be made and action taken at that time. ADJOURNMENT The Study Session was adjourned at 9:40 p.m. U ARTA VALENZUELA, MAYO CITY OF LAKE ELSINO Respectfully submitted, nn Money, City lerk MINUTES JOINT STUDY SESSION CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, JANUARY 14, 1985 CALL TO ORDER The Joint Study Session was called to order by Mayor Valenzuela at 6:35 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Vermillion. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VERMILLION, VALENZUELA BOARDMEMBERS: BARNHARDT, DOMINGUEZ, MELLINGER, SAATHOFF, WASHBURN ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT BOARDMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Community Development Director Corcoran, Assistant Planner Miner and Deputy City Clerk Bryning. nrsr.NS~rnN Mr. Corcoran reported that there is a special study area being set up in regard to the infill project which was discussed at the last study session. He stated that details will be brought back to the joint body when details are available from this pilot project. I. Draft Environmental Impact Report for Tentative Tract Map 19344. Mr. Corcoran stated that this item was brought to the study session to obtain direction. Mr. Corcoran stated that the addendum was presented to staff and was based on assumptions. In order to avoid costly and time consuming effort by staff, Planning Commission, the City Council and the author of the EIR, Planning recommends that the associated Tract Map be put on "Hold" for 3 to 6 months. Mr. Strigotte stated that FAA will be doing a study and the eventual result will be the opening of the airport unless the Air-Space study _ shows something unusual to prevent the opening. He stated that his main concern is inverse condemnation. Mr. Washburn questioned the time and it was established that the Air-Space study by FAA will take approximately 60 to 90 days. There was considerable discussion in regard to the placement of the run-ways and location of run-ways in relation to the Tentative Tract Map. Mr. Mellinger stated that he felt that there should be an Airport Element. There should be set policies for development in relation to the Airport. He will obtain samples of Airport Elements from other cities and bring them back for review. II. Industrial Development Standards. Mr. Corcoran presented the proposed Thdustrial Design Guidelines and Criteria. He asked that special attention be paid to the sections on Metal Buildings and Landscaping. Then=_was general discussion in regard to metal buildings and their uses. A picture of an example of the type of building that Planning .would recommend, was passed around and considered. It was agreed that a proper mix, looking toward quality buildings, with high criteria, should be addressed. There was further discussion in regard to Page Two Joint Study Session January 14, 1985 II. Industrial Development Standards (Continued). landscaping and the possibility of Bonding for Improvements. This would assure that the landscaping was done. Mr. Molendyk questioned the type of Industrial Standards we want to have for Lake Elsinore. He felt that the decision in regard to metal buildings be held in abeyance until we .know what our target areas are gc ng tc ~^ °or Ind"tr gal Developments. Mr. Corcoran stated that each business should be addressed as to the type of building needed. He stated that there are some block buildings that are not compatible to the needs of the user that a metal building would make possible. Mr. Washburn addressed sidewalks. He suggested sidewalks on certain perimeter roads and not on interior lots was an acceptable plan. Mr. Stri9otte asked that an ordinance be drawn up for Property Maintenance in lieu of, or with CC & R's. Mr. Corcoran suggested that the Industrial Design Guidelines and Criteria be set as policy rather than used as an Ordinance to give the City more flexibility. It was discussed and felt that the Design Review Board should get the elevations, artists renderings and complete landscaping plans when the project is presented. If needed, the landscaping plan can be brought back to the Design Review Board at a later time as part of the conditions before a Certificate of Occupancy is given. III. Noise Ordinance for Boats. There was discussion in regard to times that the lake opens and closes. The lake opens at 6:00 a.m. and closes at 10:00 p.m. It was suggested that this be used as a guideline for time frames for fishing and boating. It was also suggested that boats be regulated by noise. decible. IV. One Way Street - Lakeshore Drive. There was considerable discussion in regard to Lakeshore Drive being a one-way street. It was felt that there should be some direction taken in regard to signing for public information for direction to the lake. Several of the members present stated that citizens felt that Lakeshore Drive, as a one-way, was an inconvenience and would like to see it returned to a two-way street. It was suggested that traffic circulation could change when Lake Management goes through as well as the Lakeshore Overlay Ordinance. It was also suggested that a bridge be built over the channel at Limited Street and opened through to the location of the Sheriff's Department area. V. Broken Windows - Downtown Area. There was discussion in regard to a resolution for Standards in the Downtown area. This would address the plywood in the windows. It was agreed that this should be addressed as soon as possible. VI. Single Family Residence. This subject was discussed and. it is addressed in the Administrative Section of Title 17. This will address Single Family Residences and minor variance. -~- VII. Public Hearing Process. Mr. Corcoran reported that under Title 17, in our Zoning Ordinance, under Administration there are provisions made for the Planning Commission Nearing, hearing those items and provisions fora Council person pulling those items if they want to hear them at the Council level. The Council will be provided with an agenda from the Planning Commission. Page Three Joint Study Session January 14, 1985 VIII. Parking - Downtown. There was general discussion in regard to the parking problems in the downtown area. It was suggested that this be addressed by enforcement. The fines will be collected by the City. Mr. Saathoff requested Cff7cers for the r;+.. _, . cannot be solved if we problems. ADJOURNMENT that City Council get more Code Enforcement This ;~ on? of the areas ;n which a ~rnblem do not have the manpower to take care of the The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. ART~~'~ZUELA, M R CITY OF LAKE ELSI E Respectfully submitted, A is L. Brynin Deputy City C rk MINUTES JOINT STUDY SESSION CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 16, 1985 CALL TO ORDER The Joint Study Session of the City Council and the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore was called to order by Mayor Valenzuela at 6:36 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VALENZUELA COMMISSIONERS: DOMINGUEZ, SAATHOFF ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT, VERMILLION COMMISSIONERS: BARNHARDT, MELLINGER, WASHBURN Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Community Development Director Corcoran, Consultant Manny Nunes and City Clerk Money. REVIEW OF TITLE 17 Mr. Nunes opened the discussion and stated that it was approximately one year ago that his firm was invited to review Title 17. His firm did a complete study of other cities and formed a new Title 17 that they felt would best address the needs of the City of Lake Elsinore. There was general discussion and it was decided by consensus that they would go section by section and make the necessary changes. Mr. Nunes stated that Section 17.57 Administration, was designed to stream line the administrative process. Section 17.57.040 Appeals, should read: Any person may appeal, subject to fees, or a Council member may file an appeal, to the City Council in regard to any decision of the Planning Commission within fourteen (14) days and would become final in 30 days after Planning Commission decision. (Mr. Nunes to review other fees.) Section 17.57.100 Development and Review Committee, part E-3, should read: Any member of the Planning Commission may, within fourteen (14) calendar days, after mailing of the notice provided in paragraph D above, appeal such decision of the committee. Such appeal shall be in writing and shall be delivered to the office of the Director of Community Development. Section 17.56.050 Denials, should read: The Commission may recommend that a petition for a variance or an amendment be denied and the City Council may deny a petition, without a public hearing. (Items to be placed on Business section of Agenda and a letter sent to the public informing them that they may or may not be invited to speak.) Section 17.12.030 Accessory Uses Permitted, was discussed and it was decided that all sections in regard to animals would be flaged for further study. Carports were also discussed under this section and it was felt that Staff could approach this area under the overall! plan. Section 17.12.050 Development Standards, part A-1, should read: Existing lot sizes and legal lots will be recoginzed, but are subject to development standards as listed in this section under B and C. Section 17.16.060 Development Standards, this section was discussed and it was recommended that this section be sent back to staff for rewording and that it should address four (4) stories or fifty (50) feet and .might read Office Professional. The next meeting date for Title 17 will be set at the next City Council meeting, and will start with Chapter 17.17 C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District. Page two Joint Study Session January 16, 1985 ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m. ~~ ARTA VALENZUELA, CITY OF LAKE ELSI RE Respectfully submitted, ~~_ ANN MONEY, CITY CLERK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE MINUTES JOINT STUDY SESSION CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 1985 CALL TO ORDER The Joint Study Session of the City Council and the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Strigotte at 6:32 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Matson. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: MATSON, KNIGHT, STRIGOTTE, VERMILLION COMMISSIONERS: BARNHARDT, DOMINGUEZ, MELLINGER, SAATHOFF ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: VALENZUELA COMMISSIONERS: WASHBURN Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Community Development Director Corcoran, Assistant Planner Miner and Deputy City Clerk Bryning. REVIEW OF TITLE 17 There was considerable discussion in regard to Title 17 and the changes to the different sections. By consensus of members present, the changes are as follows: CHAPTER 17.17 C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Section 17.17.030 - Limitations on Permitted Uses - Part "B" should read: Storage shall be limited to the accessory storage of supplies utilized in the business conducted upon the premises within an enclosed building. Section 17.17. 070 - Development Standards - Part "A" should read: The building height limit in the C-1 District shall be four (4) stories, and not to exceed fifty (50) feet, Office Professional with a Conditional Use Permit for anything over four (4) stories. There was general discussion and in CHAPTER 17.45 SPECIAL PROVISIONS, a new section should be added to rea Section 17.45.070 - No vehicle may be offered for sale in any Commercial designation unless in an approved vehicle sales lot. CHAPTER 17.18 C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Section 17.18.020 - Permitted Uses - Change Eating/Drinking Establishment to read: Bonafide Restaurant. Section 17.18.030 - Limitations on Permitted Uses - Part "A" should read: 1. Parking Lots 2. Nurseries 3. Parks and Playgrounds 4. Some Recreational Facilities. Section 17.18.040 - Use Permitted Subject to Use Permit - This should be changed to read: Uses Subject to Use Permit. In this same section under Part "A", Tire Retreading and Welding Shops should be removed and placed under Commercial Manufacturing. Pool/Billiard Rooms should be added to the list. Also, Storage for cars should read: Storage, associated with sales and rental agencies for automobiles, trucks, trailers, boats, motorcycles and other types of vehicles and equipment, and repairs in conneciton therewith. Page two Joint Study Session February 4, 1985 CHAPTER 17.53 GENERAL PROVISIONS AND EXCEPTIONS This chapter should include provisions for the type of lights that will not affect Mount Palomar. CHAPTER 17.19 CBD CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT Section 17.19.010 - Purpose and Intent - This should read: This district is established, as defined by Cal-Poly Study, to provide for shopping facilities and services in support of downtown activity and to stimulate private investments in the most advantageous use of properties. etc. Section 17.19.030 - Uses Not Specified - This should read; Uses not specified may be permitted in the CBD zone subject to the approval of the Planning Commission with prior notification to the Downtown Business Assoication. CHAPTER 17.20 CT TOURIST COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Section 17.20.030 - Permitted Uses - Change Park "K" to read: Equestrian and hiking trails, bicycle trails, excluding trails for motor vehicles. Delete "A" from Accessory Uses and add it to Principal Uses as "P". Change all remaining letter in Accessory Uses accordingly. Section 17.20.040 - Prohibited Uses - Add "C" Manufacturing to this section. Section 17.20.050 - Uses Permitted Subject to Use Permit - Change Part "A" to read: Marine service stations and gas docks, drive-in facilities, cleaning establishments, laundries, launderettes, outdoor markets, outdoor restaurants, drive-in and take-out restaurants, outdoor sales establishments, pet shops, public garages, and other uses which, in the opinion of the Planning Commission are of a similar nature. Add manufacturing of marine products and new boat construction to Commercial Manufacturing. Section 17.20.070 - Development Standards - This section is to go back to the Community Development Director to reword. CHAPTER 17.21 CM COMMERCIAL MANUFACTURING DISTRICT Section 17.21.020 - Permitted Uses - Add in all other areas that were designated Commercial Manufacturing which are as follows: Tire Retreading Awning Shops Steam Cleaning Manufacturing of Marine Products Upholstering Shops Plew Boat Construction Welding Shop Section 17.21.040 - Building Height Limits - Should be changed to read: No building shall exceed fifty (50) feet or four (4) stories in height. Height shall be defined as that referenced within Section 17.02.070. CHAPTER 17.24 M-1 LIMLTED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Section 17.24.020 - Permitted Uses - Remove Scientific Research and Experimental Development Laboratories. Section 17.24.030 - Prohibited Uses - Change Part "C" to read: Storage of explosives, excepting petroleum by-products. Also, add Part "H" to read: Experimental Development Laboratories and Medical Research. CHAPTER 17.30 OS OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Section 17.30.020 - Establishment - Change "C" to read: Buffer areas which separate industrial and commercial districts from residential districts. Section 17.30.050 - Lot Coverage - This should read: No structure shall be permitted except accessory buildings or those structures related to public park and recreational facilities. Page three Joint Study Session February 4, 1985 There was discussion in regard to the next Study Session and a date will be set at the next City Council meeting on February 11, 1985. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:31 p.m. LEON RI OTT MAYOR PRO TEM CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Respectfully submitted, Ad is Bryning, DepGty ity C1 Cit of Lake. Elsinore MINUTES JOINT STUDY SESSION CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1985 CALL TO ORDER The Joint Study Session of the City Council and the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore was called to order by Mayor Valenzuela at 6:33 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Knight. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VERMILLION, VALENZUELA COMMISSIONERS: BARNHARDT, DOPIINGUEZ, MELLINGER, WASHBURN ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE COMf4ISSI0NERS: SAATHOFF Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Community Development Director Corcoran, Assistant Planner Coleman and Deputy City Clerk Bryning. REVIEW OF TITLE 17 There was considerable discussion in regard to Title 17, and the changes to the different sections. By consensus of members present, the changes are as follows: CHAPTER 17.31 - R RECREATIONAL DISTRICT Section 17.31.010 - Purpose. - This section is to be pulled and revised to address all recreational areas. Section 17.31.020 - Permitted Uses. - This section should be changed to read: All lands within this district or zone, which is below one thousand two- hundred sixty-five (1265) foot sea level elevation, and only be used for: A. Nurseries, botanicial gardens, greenhouses, orchards, the rising of field crops and trees, berry and bush crops, vegtables, flower and herb gardening, subject to Section 17.07.030 D, agricultural and horticultural uses. B. Livestock - temporary, not to exceed 60 days, grazing and shows. C. Campgrounds, picnic grounds, riding and hiking trails, stables, riding academies, and shooting ranges. D. Golf courses, boating marinas and fishing facilities. E. Similar uses to those listed in this section, which in the opinion of the Planning Commission and the City Council, would not be detrimental or incompatible with the intent and purpose, as set forth in this chapter. Section 17.31.030 - Plot Plan -- Liability. - This section is to be referred to the City Attorney to bring up to date and address bonds and collateral for properties, in the flood plain, in reference: to possible abatement. Dichotimize between Single Family Residences and all other projects for Color Rendition. CHAPTER 17.34 - CONDOMINIUMS AND CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS Section 17.34.040 - 3 B-2 - General Standards for New Condominiums. - This section should be changed to read: Page two Joint Study Session February 25, 1985 Section 17.34.040 - (Continued). 2. No exterior television antenna shall be permitted, but a common underground cable service or a common antenna'system to all dwelling units may be provided. CHAPTER 17.35 - MOBILEHOME PARK CONVERSIONS Section 17.35.040 - Legal Statute. - Correct number in this section. CHAPTER 17.35 - HILLSIDE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT There was some question in regard to parking restrictions on streets in the Hillside Developments. This will be brought back at the next Study Session. Section 17.36.120 - Building Material Restriction. - This should be changed to read as follows: Roof covering shall be limited to Class "A" material subject to Design Review Board approval. CHAPTER 17.37 - OVERLAY DISTRICT Section 17.37.030 - Scenic(s). - B-lb & 6-4a - These sections should be changed to read: 1. b) Lagoons, watercourses, wetlands and wildlife habitats shall be maintained and protected where feasible; 4. a) Where practical, all new utilities, including the linkage between main line and structures, shall be underground. Section 17.37.080 - District Preservation (DP). - This sections should read as follows: A. Purpose: The purpose of this overlay is to preserve the historic, economic, cultural, and architectural resource values of designated districts by encouraging compatible uses and architectural design. 1. Within district preservation areas, careful consideration and review shall be given by City staff and Planning Commission to those projects deemed unique or which contain historical, economic, or cultural values, and which merit special architectural treatment for restoration or for new construction. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. ~~ RTA VALENZUELA, OR CITY OF LAKE ELS RE Respectfully submitted, i' Ad-ia L. Bryning, Deputy ity le MINUTES COUNCIL STUDY SESSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA WEDNESDAY, MARCH 6, 1985 CALL TO ORDER The Study Session of the City Council wzs called to order by Mayor Valenzuela at 6:08 p. m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Strigotte. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VALENZUELA ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: VERMILLION Also present were: .City Manager Molendyk, City Attorney Nazarek, Community Development Director Corcoran, City Engineer Culp and City Clerk Money. BUSINESS MATTERS Mr. Molendyk stated that the purpose of this meeting was to discuss Mello Roos Facilities Districts and Landscaping and Lighting Districts as possible means available to finance the cost of services for some of the development occurring within the community. He asked Mr. Nazarek to explain these two financing mechanisms and how they operate. Mr. Nazarek explained that Landscaping and Lighting Districts have a separate purpose from those facilities financed through Mello Roos. The city should pick up all pending developer agreements to join a Landscaping and Lighting District and include them in a 1972 Act Landscaping and Lighting District. A procedure should be established so that, as new tracts come into the city, they can be annexed into the District, concurrent with approval of the Tract Map. The City Engineer will determine which parcels should be assessed. Annual tax levy would be assessed based on a pre-determined formula. Once the city has held public hearings and approved the establishment of a Landscaping and Lighting District, there is no right of protest. New tracts are automatically annexed into the District. Mr. Nazarek explained that the Mello Roos facilities Act is limited to the maintenance and operation of police, fire, flood control, drainage, parks and parkways. All Tract Maps could be conditioned to be subject to inclusion in a Mello Roos Community Facilities District. Mello Roos requires that a consultant be hired to prepare a report which must include the following information: 1. Set forth the boundaries of the District. 2. Define the facilities and services to be provided. 3. Set forth estimated cost of facilities and services. 4. Establish the maximum annual special tax rate that any parcel within the District would be subject to. .Each property owner must be able to determine his maximum tax rate. We must prepare a master plan of police, fire, storm drains, parks, water, sewer (coordinate with EVMWD), bridges, traffic signals, roads, drainage as well as public facilities such as a Civic Center, Community Center, and City Yard, etc. City could hire a consultant, pay for the Mello Roos study and be reimbursed by the developers. Mr. Nazarek would work with staff and the consultant and prepare necessary resolutions, .notices, etc. Page Two Council Study Session Minutes March 6, 1985 Council consensus was to place two reports on the next regular Council Agenda on March 12, 1985 as follows: Authorize City Manager to negotiate for professional services related to the formation of a Mello Roos Community Facilities District and a Landscaping and Lighting District. ADJOURNMENT The Study Session was adjourned at 7:55 p.m. ~~~%~~ ~/ ARTA VALENZUELA, MAY CITY OF LAKE ELSI E Respectfully submitted, ~v CG~...~ }1iL~-~-~ o Ann Money, City C erk MINUTES JOINT STUDY SESSION CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, MARCH 18, 1985 CALL TO ORDER The Joint Study Session of the City Council and the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore was called to order by Mayor Valenzuela at 6:40 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Washburn. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VALENZUELA .COMMISSIONERS: BARNHARDT, DOMINGUEZ, P1ELLINGER, WASHBURN ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: VERMILLION COMMISSIONERS: SAATHOFF Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Community Development Director Corocran, Assistant Planner Miner and Deputy City Clerk Brynin9. REVIEW OF TITLE 17 There was considerable discussion in regard to Title 17, and the changes to the different sections. By consensus of members present, the changes are as follows: CHAPTER 17.40 - SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Section 17.40.020 - Lot Size. - This section was discussed by the members present and it was decided that Commissioner Washburn will bring back more information to better base a decision in regard to this section at the next study session. Section 17.40.030 - Dwelling Size. - Change MU - MINIMUM DWELLING UNIT SIZE to read 650 SQUARE FEET.. Section 17.40.040 - Setbacks. - Under PUD, MC, MU AND SPD Districts - Change aestherically to aesthetically. Section 17.40.050 - Separation Between Buildings. - Mr. Corcoran will bring back this section with definitions, at the next study session. Section 17.40.120 - Screening-Landscaping. - All storage shall be screened and landscaped as approved by the Design Review Board. (Title could read - Storage Screening and Landscaping). CHAPTER 17.41 - PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Section 17.41.030 - Noise. - Add "refer to State Standards" in this section. Section 17.41.090 - Glare. - This section will be addressed at the next study .session. There was a study session set for April 3, 1985 at 6:30 p.m. to further address Title 17. ADJOURNMENT The Joint Study Session was adjourned at 8:06 p.m. Respectfully submitted, A ~ / Cr/ r~Ca~/ RT VALENZU LA, MAYOR City of Lake Elsinore ria L. Brynin9, epu City C erk MINUTES JOINT STUDY SESSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE/ RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, APRIL 1, 1985 CALL TO ORDER The Study Session of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore and the Boardmembers of the Lake Elsinore Recreation and Park District was called to order by t4ayor Valenzuela at 6:04 p. m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Valenzuela. ROLL CALL COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT, PIATSON, STRIGOTTE, VERMILLION, VALENZUELA BOARDMEMBERS: BROWN, LAKEY, WOOD Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Norton, Community Development Director Corcoran, General Planager Fry, Contract Administrator for Recreation and Park District Pepin, Board Secretary Pearson and Deputy City Clerk Bryning. DISCUSSION Review of Agreement Between City of Lake Elsinore and Lake Elsinore Recreation and Park District. There was considerable discussion in regard to the agreement and the way to improve effectiveness of the administration of the park facilities. It was agreed by all present that there was a need for better communication and improvements in the master calendar. The Junior High facilities were discussed. Mr. Strigotte suggested that we open communication with the School District in regard to utilization of that facility. City Manager Molendyk addressed the Community Center and the situation of fees. Who should be waivered and cost of uses. 2. Ordinances No. 1. General Manager Fry addressed Ordinance No. 1. He stated that the Ordinance was based on the Quimby Act. It was developed to provide land in lieu of fees for park services. In 1982 the Act was amended by Senate Bill 1785. That was the origin of Ordinance PJo. 1. Mr. Fry asked that the City Council consider adoption of Ordinance No. 1. The Fees in Ordinance No. 1 were questioned and Mr. Fry explained that the formula was based on 3.6 persons per dwelling unit which equals to .018 acres per dwelling unit of parkland. In dollar figures this amounts to $1,300 per unit. Mr. Molendyk suggested that the City should consider up-grading our ordinance to conform to the Quimby Act. The calculations and time limits need to be addressed by staff before we proceed. This would be through a Master Plan. 3. plaster Plan of Parks - City and District. Mr. Strigotte stated that the City wishes to retain ownership of parks and that there should be in-put from the District in direction of develop- ment of the parks. This would come from communication between the City and the District. This would prevent conflict of facilities. Director La key stated that the reason she asked for this to be on the Study Session agenda was to gain cooperation between the City Page two Study Session April 1, 1985 3. Master Plan of Parks - City and District - Continued. and District fora blend between the County areas and the City areas, especially when annexation is a possibility. That is why it is important for us to agree in regard to the Ordinance for parkland or fees. Open communication between Community Development and the District should be able to handle this. 4. After-School Activities for 'Latch Key Kids' John Matson suggested that the City and Park District consider programs for 'Latch Key Kids', specifically elementary school age, for before and after school time. Mr. Matson suggested that it might be possible to develop this program by coordinating through the Recreation and Park District using the schools, which are available facilities, with help from the City. This might be funded through the joint effort of the County, City and Recreation and Park District. Mr. Pepin explained that there are three factors which are as follows: 1. Place 2. Cost 3. Quality of Program The Recreation and Park District has already been in touch with the High School, and if it can be worked out with the School District a program will be developed. We are considering the High School because of the location. It would be easy for parents to drop off the children before school and pick them up at that location. Mr. Pepin stated that the program could be supported either totally.. or in part by the parents. This would be a user-fee. The amount could be $20.00 to $35.00 a week. Mr. Pepin also stated that there are grant funds, but that this was in the social services area and might not be to our benefit. 5. Tentative Tract Map 19344 - Lakeside Estates - Ken Buchannan. Tentative Tract Map 19344 was presented to the Council and the Board. There was general discussion in regard to the placement of the park and the type of land that it is to be placed on. P1r. Zola explained the lay-out of the tract and the reasons for the proposed area and limit of the development of the park site. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:42 p.m. AR A VALENZUELA, MAYO CITY OF LAKE ELSINO Respectfully submitted, A is L. ryni g, epu ity rk MINUTES JOINT STUDY SESSION CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA WEDNESDAY, APRIL 3, 1985 CALL TO ORDER The Joint Study Session of the City Council and the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore was called to order by Mayor Valenzuela at 6:32 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Matson. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VALENZUELA COMMISSIONERS:. BARNHART, DOMINGUEZ, MELLINGER, SAATHOFF ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT, VERMILLION COMMISSIONERS: WASHBURN Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Community Development Director Corcoran, Assistant Planner Miner and Deputy City Clerk Bryning. REVIEW OF TITLE 17 There was general discussion in regard to the positions and attitudes of the staff, Planning Commissioners and City Councilmembers. Title 17 was addressed and the changes to the different sections are to be changed by consensus of the City Council and the Planning Commissioners. CHAPTER 17.42 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, VARIANCES MINOR EXCEPTIONS Section 17.42.010 - General - This section should read: The Planning Commission is authorized under conditions herein provided to grant minor exceptions to, and variances from the provisions of this Chapter, and to grant conditional use permits, variances and minor exceptions, which are subject to the appeal process, far uses in any zone in which uses may be conditionally permitted. This section should also be addressed on the application. Section 17.42.020 - Conditional Use Permit, Variance and Minor Exception Application -- Initiation, Scope - This section should read: Section C-10 - Eliminate this section. Change numbers accordingly. Section C-11 - This section should read: Any establishment serving liquor or beer for consumption on the premises to be operated or located within five hundred (500) feet of any property zoned or used for schools, churches, residential or agricultural purposes. Section 17.42.060 - Continuances -This section should read: Upon the date set fora hearing the Council or Planning Commission may on that date continue the matter. The reasons for continuation must be stated in the motion. If a date for the continued hearing is thereupon announced in open meeting, no further notice thereof need be given. Section 17.42.080 - Planning Commission to Make Finding of Fact, Filing Review - Second Paragraph, Statement, "by majority vote", should also reflect that one Councilmember can bring it up as a business item. Section 17.42.120 - Revocation Procedure for Conditional Use Permits, Variances, and Minor Exception Permits - The first paragraph should read: The Planning Commission may, after twenty (20) days, notice, by registered or certified snail, the recorded owner of the property and the tenant of said property, if any, and after a public hearing, revoke a conditional use permit, variance, or a minor exception permit,. on any one or more of the following grounds:........ Page two Joint Study Session April 3, 1985 CHAPTER 17.45 SPECIAL PROVISIONS Section 17.45.030 - Automobile Service Stations - This section should be addressed by the City Manager and the Community Development Director in regard to signs, and the City Engineer should be consulted regarding Cal-Trans ruling of off-ramps for service stations and truck stops. CHAPTER 17.46 ADULT BUSINESS Section 17.46.020 - Intent - Include 'shall require review by City Council'. Section 17.46.030 - Special Regulations.- Eliminate Section 'B' totally. CHAPTER 17.49 .PARKING REQUIREMENTS Handicap parking spaces must be properly marked before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. Section 17.49.050 - Number of Required Parking Spaces - This section should read: A. One-family dwellings: At least two (2) enclosed spaces for each dwelling, but not more than three (3) encolsed spaces. B. Two-family dwellings: At least two (2) enclosed spaces for each dwelling. C. Apartment dwellings/complexes: At least one (1) covered space for each dwelling unit and a minimum of two (2) covered and un- covered spaces far each dwelling unit. Section 17.49.120 - Deferring Requirements - Section A-2 should read: Bond for the improvements, with escalation clause. CHAPTER 17.50 SIGNS Section 17.50.030 - Definitions - Under the section, 'Good Repair', add, 'maintain paint'. Section 17.50.040 - Sign Permit - Section A-5 - The Community Development Director to check standards of-real estate signs used in this area. Section 17.50.040 - Sign Permit - Section C - At the_ end of this statement add: 'with written statement for reasons of revocation'. Section 17.50.050 - Prohibited Signs - Section H - Animated or moving signs: Signs consisting of any moving, swinging, rotating, flashing, blinking, scintillating, fluctuating, or otherwise animated:' light, are prohibited, except for time and temperature displays. Section 17.50.050 - Prohibited Signs - Off-premise signs: Any sign, other than a directional sign, installed for the purpose of advertising an event, person or subject, not related to the premises upon which said sign is located, is prohibited except as permitted by the Community Development Director. Section 17.50.070 - General Sign Provisions - Section C-2 b. and c. - This section should be reworded. Section 17.50.070-General Sign Provisions - Section C-5 c. and e. - These sections need to be reworded. Section 17.50.070 - General Sign Provisions - Section E, Political Signs - The Community Development Director will address this section and reword. Section 17.50.090 - A71 Allocated Sign Area - Section A-2 - Bring into conformity to other real estate signs. CHAPTER 17.53 GENERAL PROVISIONS AND EXCEPTIONS Section 17.53.020 - Block Walls - Section B - The color of which shall be determined by the Design Review Board. Section 17.53.180 - Keeping of Large Animals - Strike R-2 and R-3 District from the sentence. Also, change 20,000 square feet to.24,000 square feet. Page three Joint Study Session April 3, 1985 CHAPTER 17.53 GENERAL PROVISIONS AND EXCEPTIONS - Continued. Section 17.53.180 - Keeping of Large Animals - Section A - The following aggregate numbers will be permitted in conjunction with a residence: Land Area Numbers 24,000 square feet to 1 acre 1 1 acre or more 2 plus 1 per additional acre. Section 17.53.180 - Keeping of Large Animals - Section D - Sanitation Requirements - Change '15 days' to '1 day'. Section 17.53.190 - Roofing Materials - Class 'A' roofing materials shall be used. (This section should be added on.) CHAPTER 17.07 R-1 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT Section 17.07.030 - Permitted Uses - Add Section I,- Day Care Centers - Day Care Centers shall be allowed, subject to a Conditional Use Permit, only in conjunction with an approved school or a church. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:02 p.m. ARTA VA EN A, ~~~ CITY OF LAKE ELSINO Respectfully submitted, A ria L. Bryning, Deput City C k MINUTES COUNCIL STUDY SESSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, APRIL 8, 1985 CALL TO ORDER The Study Session of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore was called to order by Mayor Valenzuela at 6:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Matson. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VERMILLION, VALENZUELA ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Finance Director Garrick, City Engineer Culp, RDA Administrator Modesti, Economic Development Consultant Wedin and City Clerk Money. DISCUSSION ITEMS I. Economic Development Program Mr. Molendyk stated the purpose of this meeting was to review the rough draft of the Economic Development Program, receive Council input and answer any questions, in order to refine the report and present the final version at a public meeting. Mr. Wayne Wedin, Economic Consultant, gave an overview of the draft report and addressed the following major aspects: 1. Identification of the Trade area and our position in the marketplace. A balanced community must have certain ratios of land use, normally about fifty percent residential, twenty-five percent streets and public right-of-way, fifteen percent for public uses such as parks, and public buildings and ten percent industrial and commercial. Our 'trade area' is roughly identified as the area from Glen Ivey on the north, almost to Murietta to the south. It extends from the hills on the west and approximately sixty to seventy percent of the way to Perris. In 1982, the trade area had a population base of 25,000 residents, and approximately 10,000 total households. Average household size was 2.5 persons. The City of Lake Elsinore is the dominant agency and heart of this trade area. 1985 projections show 30,000 population, 40,000 by 1990 and 60,000 by 1995. Most recent study shows we could reach 60,000 population by 1990. 2. Commercial Development Mr. Wedin defined 'major tenant' as types of businesses that can anchor a commercial project. They are larger in size and use more square footage. Major tenant needs in our area are: a. Variety Stores b. Grocery Stores c. Apparel Stores d. Furniture Stores e. Auto Service Stores Page two Council Study Session April 8, 1985 I. Economic Development Program - Continued. 2. Commercial Development - Continued. f. Banks and Financial Institutions g. Motor Inns and Motel/Hotel Space h. Auto Dealership (2) i. Food Service (Not Fast-Food) Substantial leakage of revenue, that is, persons going outside the trade area to shop, include the following categories: a. Variety Stores b. Apparel Stores c. Furniture Stores d. Auto Dealerships Other types of retail tenants needed are: a. Specialty Foods b. Appliance Stores c. Radio, TV and Music Stores d. Liquor Stores e. Other Types of financial Institutions f. Personal Services g. Nurseries (Plants) h. Card and Stationary Shops We now have data and can determine what type of businesses to go after to relocate here, preferably those which generate sales tax revenue, such as auto dealerships. This information and report will give statis- tical data that we can take to the bank to support recruitment efforts. The report will show the amount of square footage by year, that is anticipated due to increased population. Mr. Wedin encourages the City to stimulate development so that we can aggregate land uses effectively and avoid segmenting commercial devel- opment all over the city. He encourages a sub-regional center, set aside acreage, master plan the area to be built out over a period of years so that it will be available as the need grows. Staff should review all retail plans in progress to ascertain if they are moving forward. When we reach 40,000 population, we will need 600,000 additional retail square feet of development, or fifty-six acres, to support the residential growth. 3. Industrial Uses The Industrial trade area is different and includes Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. Historically, the types of users that will continue to be strong are: a. Construction Industry (office space) b. Stone, Clay and Glass Manufacturers Other large pad users include: a. Fabricated Metal Products Manufacturing b. Transportation Equipment c. Lumber and Wood Products Manufacturing d. Electrical Assembly e. Mobile and Recreational Vehicle Assembly The City should be specific in the types of users we go after. Get the information to the 'movers and shakers' who stimulate business and promote relocation to this area. Page three Council Study Session April 8, 1985 I. Economic Development Program - Continued. 4. Residential Uses Residential growth must come along in a reasonable way, in order to maintain a balance. As residential projects are considered, Council and the City should talk to developers regarding their impact on the community and services. 5. Conclusion Mr. Wedin stated we are nearing the end of Phase I. Final step is com- pletion of the Report which he hopes to have available the week of April 15, 1985. We should present the final program at a future Council Meeting and allow for public questions and reactions. Success of the Program depends on how it is sold. It was agreed that the May 9, 1985 Economic Development Meeting would be a good opportunity to kick off the program and get important people interested. Also, Mr. Wedin will plan to make a presentation at the June 26, 1985 Joint County/Western Cities Meeting on June 26, 1985. II. City Clerk/Council Matters 1. Council Policies and Procedures Council consensus was to direct City Clerk to work with committee to prepare a manual, not an ordinance, outlining procedures regarding meetings, Council, Redevelopment Agency and L.E.T.S. Board, compensation of members, policies related to keys, personnel, travel and training, etc. 2. Increase of Compensation for Councilmembers. Consensus was to address this proposed increase through the budget process. 3. Election Consolidation City Clerk was directed to prepare a report on this issue and place on the next Council agenda, April 23, 1985. 4. Use of Council Chambers for telecasting of EVMWD, School District and Park District Meetings. Consensus was, due to the need to have the Chamber available for Council and other city meetings and functions, the city should not consider scheduling District functions. 5. Council Photograph City Clerk was directed to schedule a photo session prior to an upcoming study session or City Council meeting. III. Adjournment The Study Session of the City Council was adjourned at 7:45 p.m. UCI~C Arta Valenzuela, z or Respectfully submitted, J nn Money, City Clerk MINUTES JOINT STUDY SESSION CITY COUNCIL/CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, APRIL 11, 1985 CALL TO ORDER The Joint Study Session of the City Council and the Lake Elsinore Valley Chamber of Commerce was called to order by Mayor Valenzuela at 6:03 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chamber President Jewel. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VERMILLION, VALENZUELA BOARDMEMBERS: BARNHART, JEWEL, KEMPE MAYHALL, STARKEY ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Finance Director Garrick, Personnel Director Schoolcraft, RDA Administrator Modes ti and City Clerk Money. DISCUSSION PLATTERS A. Agreement Between the City of Lake Elsinore and Lake Elsinore Valley Chamber of Commerce - F/Y 1984/85. Discussion centered around 'Exhibit A' of this agreement which lists seven major events which the Chamber of Commerce provides for the City annually. Council commented that the $15,000 which was contributed by the City to the Chamber, might be better utilized for promoting economic development to bring industry into the City. Delores Mayhall explained that a large percentage of the Chamber budget goes towards promoting the City. The events listed on the schedule were determined several years ago, and for ease in accounting, City funds have con- tinued to be earmarked for these events. It was agreed that the Chamber and the City need to work more closely in an effort to improve the image of the City. B. Frontier Days and Rodeo - May 25, 26 and 27, 1985. Mr: Molendyk reported that he and staff have met with the Chamber committee to discuss and coordinate this event. The City will be providing a water truck during the event and we are encouraging a City employee to volunteer to drive the truck. Sulphur water will be used to wet down the Rodeo grounds. County Fire and Sheriff's Department will inspect for compliance with their requirements, at the appropriate time. Holding tanks Drill be pumped out after the event. A list has been posted at City Yard for those employees who wish to volunteer their services. It was suggested that the Chamber submit a financial statement to the City Council., after the event, showing the financial outcome. Hilda Barnhart invited Councilmembers and staff to ride in the Frontier Days Parade on Saturday, May 25, 1985. COUNCIL/BOARD COMMENTS Mr. Molendyk suggested that when the Chamber, or any civic organization wishes Council to attend a specific function, they should notify them one month in advance, whenever possible. Page two Joint Study Session April 11, 1985 COMMENTS - Continued. There were several positive comments by the members regarding the produc- tivity of this meeting. It was suggested that these meetings be continued on a regular basis, in order to keep the lines of communication open and to establish a closer working relationship. ADJOURNMENT The Joint Study Session was adjourned at 7:26 p.m. A TA A ENZ A, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINOR Respectfully submitted, J Ann Money, City C er MINUTES JOINT STUDY SESSION CITY COUNCIL/DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA WEDNESDAY, APRIL l7, 1985 **************************************** CALL TO ORDER The Joint Study Session of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore and the Downtown Business Association of the City of Lake Elsinore was called to order by Mayor Valenzuela at 6:01 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by D.B.A. President Todd. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VERMILLION, VALENZUELA BOARDMEMBERS: PRESIDENT TODD, PAST PRESIDENT ROYBAL_, SECRETARY ROYBAL DIRECTOR DOMINGUEZ, ACTING DIRECTOR WHITE Also present were: D.B.A. Members Mayhall and Sisson, City Manager Molendyk, Community Development Director Corcoran, City Engineer Culp, R.D.A. Administrator Modesti and Deputy City Clerk Bryning. DISCUSSION 1. Bricks for Crosswalks - Mr. White addressed the bricks for the cross- walks. He stated that there are 32,000 bricks at a cost of $3,000 and a new location must be found to store them. D.B.A. will pursue this issue. City Engineer Culp explained the cost of laying the crosswalks. The cost for the construction was $5.35 per square foot for the first crosswalk. The total cost was about $5,000.00. An alternate form of crosswalks, to appear as brick, is bolminite. The cost of finished bolminite is about half the cost of brick. Mr. Culp will bring back the exact cost for both methods. He will also look into the possibility of grant funds for this project. 2. Care of Trees and Planters in Downtown Area - It was proposed that the trees might be put in wells cut into the sidewalks. Abetter watering schedule was proposed in order to maintain the trees.. 3. Storm Drainage System at Main and Graham - The storm drainage system at Main Street and Graham will be addressed at the next budget for future improvements. to make the system underground. 4. Fees Collected from Merchants, Professionals and Apartment Owners in the Assessment District - A procedure for payment should be formed by the D.B.A. to aid the Finance Department in payment quarterly. This would prevent the funds from going to the wrong place. 5. Property Located at 110 - 110% West Graham - The property at 110 - 110%Z West Graham was considered as a future parking lot. There was general discussion and the matter will be brought back to Council. 6. Low Interest Loans - Low Interests Loans were discussed and a direct loan program will be considered. 7. Ordinance and Code Enforcement - Business licenses were discussed and it was felt that as part of the business license it could also be issued as a permit to operate. This would give the City more power to enforce problems within the City. Deliveries of merchandise were discussed and loading zones will be considered. Traffic hazards, especially 'U' turns in the downtown area were discussed. This will be addressed by signing. Page two Joint Study Session April 17, 1985 7. Ordinances and Code Enforcement - Continued. The Urban Design Study was addressed. Mr. Corcoran stated that this study has been adopted in concept only. This ties the hands of Code Enforcement. It is up to the business owner to conform to the study. Mr. Strigotte stated that the Downtown Business Association should approach the different places of business that do not conform, and make suggestions and requests. 8. Business Permits for Used Items on Main Street - Used items were discussed and Mr. Strigotte stated that this is a very sensitive issue. What is used to one person can be an antique to another. The issuance of the Business Permit is at the discretion of the City Manager at this time, but Title 17 will be addressing this issue. 9. Lake Management - Mayor Valenzuela called for support and cooperation in favor of the Lake Management Plan. 10. Processing Requests Through City Staff - Requests should be in writing. a representative from D.B.A. should be appointed for staff to approach and process communication. Staff needs to address all citizens reports with a follow-up letter of communication. 11. Riverside County Employees Credit Union - This item should be brought to the next City Council meeting for consideration. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:55 p.m. Lf/ .=G~J ARTA VALEN VELA, MA CITY OF LAKE ELSIN E Respectfully submitted, A is L. Bryni g, Deput. City Cl k MINUTES COUNCIL STUDY SESSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA WEDNESDAY, JUNE 5, 1985 CALL TO ORDER The Study Session of the City Council was called to order by Mayor Valenzuela at 6:34 p. m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Knight. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VALENZUELA ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: VERMILLION Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Community Development Director Corcoran and Deputy City Clerk Bryning. DISCUSSION Canyon Lake Hills - Tentative Tract 17413-3, P.U.D. 83-1. Mr. Nabil 0. E1Kotn, representative of the owner of Canyon Lake Hills, (A. B. C. Heritage-Alta .Banner Realty), opened the discussion and stated that a letter was filed with the City Clerk's office requesting a time extention on Tentative Tract Map 17413-3. He also urged the City Council to give them an opportunity to place the project in an active status and continue on with the project. Mr. Roy E. June, Attorney at Law, representing the original property owners stated that he was the attorney that put the project together in 1980 and gave a breif history of the project. He stated that the original owners had started foreclosure and it was stoped when bankruptcy was filed. The original property owners are making an appeal to the United States Bankruptcy Court to allow a continuance of foreclosure on the property. He also, wanted to inform Council that at the United States Bankruptcy hearing on June 2, 1985, that it was ruled that fees be paid to the City of Lake Elsinore in the amount of $43,600 and application be made far a time extention on the Tentative Tract Map 17413-3 by June 21, 1985. Councilman Matson stated that he had some concerns in regard to the conditions of the Tentative Tract Map since the City has made revisions of conditions for all Tentative Tract Maps. Mr. Matson also stated, that there may be a breach of contract on the Development Agreement, and that our City Attorney will have to review this item. Councilman Strigotte stated that there should be an agreement considered which would allow modifications of the Tentative Tract Map which would be part of the extention of the Tentative Tract Map. Mayor Valenzuela stated that at the Study Session no decision could be made and that the Council will study the Tentative Tract Map 17413-3 and address it at the City Council Meeting at the time it is brought before the Council for extension. ADJOIIRNMFNT The meeting was adjourned at 6:55 p. m. Respectfully submitted, A is L. Bryning, Dep~ RA VALE EA, M R CITY OF LAKE ELSI E k. P1INUTES JOINT STUDY SESSION CITY COUNCIL/PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA WEDNESDAY, JUNE 19, 1985 CALL TO ORDER The Joint Study Session of the City Council and the Public Safety Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore was called to order by Mayor Valenzuela at 6:30 p. m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Strigotte. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VERMILLION, VALENZUELA COMMISSIONERS: BURNELL, CHADWICK, GEARHART, SCHILLER, STEPHENS Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Norton and Deputy City Clerk Bryning. DISCUSSION Mayor Ualenzuela introduced Mr. Ron Gearhart as the Chairman of the Public Safety Commission and went on to explain that the City of Lake Elsinore is a General Law City, with a City Manager. The City Council sets policy and the City Administrator carries out that policy. ORDINANCE N0. 720 - Role of the Public Safety Commission. Commissioner Burnell questioned the exact duty of a Commissioner. City Manager Molendyk explained that the role of the Public Safety Commission is to make recommendations both to staff and the City Council. Councilman Strigotte addressed Section 6 of Ordinance 720 and explained the functions of the Commission. He stated that the Commission is an evidence gathering body geared toward investigation and study. They may be asked to sit oral boards and be requested to assist in any civil disaster or disorder. The Public Safety Commission may be asked to appea-r before the City. Council as part of the agenda and give their recommendations. Commissioner Chadwick addressed Section 7 of Ordinance 720. She questioned time set for meetings and. requested more lead time for meetings called by the staff or the City Council. RELATIONSHIPS A. City Council Councilman Strigotte stated that the City. Council is the final hearing body that the Public Safety Commission makes their recommendations to. The recommendation that the Public Safety Commission makes should follow the philosophy of the City Council. Councilman Matson suggested that the Public Safety Commission be as independent as possible. The Council will request that certain things things be set for study and then it is the Public. Safety Commissions responsibility to bring their findings back to Council for consideration. The Council may not agree with the Public Safety Commission, but they will value the effort of the opinion. ~~ Page two ~ Joint Study Session I June 19, 1985 RELATIONSHIPS - Continued. B. City Manager Molendyk stated that it is the responsibility of staff to make themselves available to the Commissioners. It is important for the Commissioners to make appointments with the Department Heads. so that=they might make themselves available. City Manager Molendyk asked that the Commissioners give staff time to accomplish requests due to the many demands made on their time. Commissioner Stephens requested that a library be formed for the Public Safety Commission, in order to have reference material on hand for their study. Staff will address this. AGENDA - Meeting Format. A. 1-2 Hour Meetings. It was suggested by the City Manager that a meeting of more than 1 to 2 hours would lose. its effectiveness. If the Public Safety Commission finds that their meetings last longer, they might consider two meetings a month in lieu of one a month. B. Follow Agenda. City Manager Molendyk addressed items given to staff. These items are given to staff and a detailed report is formed and placed on the Public Safety Agenda. Your decisions are based on the information from staff and your own investigation. If you find that the items placed on the agenda do not have all the necessary information you require to base a recommendation, they should be sent back to staff. It is also the responsibility of the Commissioners to study their agenda and look into the issues and items presented. C. Service Request List. At the end of each meeting, prior to the adjournment, the body is asked to state their requests, to staff, for follow-up and future presentation. These items will be presented at the next meeting or in a reasonable time. D. Professional Staff Requests. City Manager Molendyk stated that it is difficult to expect a representative from the Sheriff's Department or the Fire Department to be present at meet- ings, unless there is an issue that they can address. If there is a need for special service due to questions or recommendations from the Public Safety Commission, such as a Traffic Engineer, then they should be hired for a certain amount of hours to address necessary issues. Commissioner Burnell questioned the availability of work-shops or seminars in regard to the cost factor. Councilman Strigotte stated that Travel, Tranning & Dues were budgeted for the Public Safety Commission and he suggested that the monies be split between the Commissioners in order to give each member the opportunity to attend different work-shops or seminars. _ Mayor Valenzuela stated that if any member attends a work-shop or seminar, that it is the responsibility of that member to bring a report back to the other members. She also stated that there is a liason, P1r. Strigotte and his co-chairman Mr. Matson, that the Public Safety Commissioners can call on for guidance. PRIORITIES A. Airport Ordinance This item was discussed by all members present and will be taken back to the Council appointed Airport Committee. Page three Joint Study Session June 19, 1985 PRIORITIES B. Traffic Standards. Councilman Strigotte asked that the Public Safety Commission consider forming a set of Traffic Standards for the City of Lake Elsinore. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS City Manager Molendyk 1. Stated that there will be more Study Sessions and work-shops for the City Council, Commissioners and staff. There will be one in October in regard to goals and plans for the City of Lake Elsinore. 2. Reported that the City Engineer is working on some projects. The City Engineer has determined that the City has not used their FAU funds and City Engineer Keith is looking into possible projects. Councilman Matson 1. Would like to see staff and the Public Safety Commission address a traffic light at four corners. Stated that he would like to see this set as a top priority. 2. Would like to see the problem of traffic at Central and Collier St. addressed by the Public Safety Commission. 3. Suggested that the Public Safety Commission address the painting of cross-walks before the begining of the next school year. Councilman Knight 1. Feels that the Council should be responsible for most of the issues stated in this Study Session and is not in favor of continuing the Public Safety Commission. Councilman Vermillion Questioned the function of the Public Safety Commission and is not in favor of the Commission if their objective is to police the City rather than investigate and make recommendations. Councilman Strigotte 1. Commends the Public Safety Commission on their willingness to investigate and recommend to Council their findings. This allows the Council the freedom to look into other things and gives the Council an indepth look into public safety. 2. Stated that he agreed with Councilman Platson that the area at Central and four corners needs to be addressed. Mayor Valenzuela 1. Wished to extend her thanks to the Public Safety Commission and commend them on their efforts. AD,7(lI1RNMFNT The meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m. L~ <%G-CGLi ~12G-~ ~~ ARTA VALENZUELA, A Respectfully submitted, CITY OF LAKE ELSI ~• Ad is L. Bryning, Deput ity rk MINUTES COUNCIL STUDY SESSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, JULY 9, 1985 CALL TO ORDER The Study Session of the City Council was called to order by Mayor Valenzuela at 6:34 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VERMILLION, VALENZUELA ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, City Engineer Keith, City Attorney Harper, Community Development Director Corcoran and City Clerk Money. Mr. Molendyk reported that the purpose of this study session is to give Council an overview of the City Engineer's observations to date, and to receive some policy guidance to proceed with capital projects. 1. Drainage System Milo Keith gave background report on storm drain systems. He commented that the City Council and the Downtown Business Association have indicated a desire to pave the downtown alleys and streets. Mr. Keith suggested an interim storm drain system for the downtown area which could be done at a much more reasonable cost than the complete storm drain system. The City Attorney .and City Engineer will meet on Friday to work out details and will briny back a report 'to Gouncil. 2. Ordinance Number 572 Mr. Keith reported that Council's new infill policy is not compatible with Ordinance 572. There have been numerous requests for waivers which must be brought to Council. Also, these infill projects tend to generate piecemeal construction which creates City liability. He suggested we collect fees for certain improvements and hold in a special account until such time as an entire section of work can be completed. Mr. Molendyk suggested writing an Ordinance 572A specifically addressing infill projects. 3. Field Review of Campus Way Mr. Keith reported that, at Councilman Knight's request, he conducted a field review of Campus Way for a possible street improvement project. In order to do this, it would be necessary to install a complete storm drain system first. This would require a study to determine cost and method of financing. 4. Lakepoint Park Mr. Keith explained the need for extensive grading and storm drain. The park is in Zone B of the flood plain and the elevation goes down to 1261 feet. Mr. Molendyk recommended continuing this project on a fast track as it is still less expensive to grade Lakepoint Park than to purchase an eight to ten acre park site. 5. Vine Street Storm Drain Mr. Keith reported that the County has approved a contract for a storm drain which will dump drainage water into the City of Lake Elsinore. Mr. Keith will research Assessor Parcel maps to determine if this is private property and consult with City Attorney as to how to proceed. Page two Council Study Session July 9, 1985 6. Adjournment The Study Session of the City Council was adjourned at 6:54 p.m. ARTA VALENZUELA, MA CITY OF LAKE ELSIN Repsectfully submitted, B2tP Ann Money, City Clerk MINUTES JOINT STUDY SESSION CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION -CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, AUGUST 12, 1985 CALL TO ORDER The joint study session of the Gity Council and Planning Commission was called to order by Mayor Valenzuela at 6:32 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Community Development Director Corcoran. ROLL CALL .PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VERMILLION, VALENZUELA COMMISSIONERS: MELLINGER, SAATHOFF, WASHBURN ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE COMMISSIONERS: BARNHART, DOMINGUEZ Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Community Development Director Corcoran, Assistant Engineer Riley and City Clerk Money. BUSINESS ITEMS 1. The General Plan as a Dynamic Document - Mr. Corcoran presented an overview of the General Plan and stated it is designed to be a guideline for the city as it grows and develops. It is a stable document but must be flexible to allow changes as they become necessary, depending on growth or changes in philosophy. Also, changes have been necessary due to omissions which occured when the General Plan was oricinally adopted in 1982. We are currently allowed four Genera l Plan amendments annually. The General .Plan is general, not parcel specific. Zoning is parcel specific but should conform to the General Plan Land Use Element which takes precedence. By law, cities are allowed two years to bring their zoning into conformance with the General Plan. The City needs to initiate several General Plan amendments to bring areas into conformance. 2. Areas of Specific Concern - a. Old Hotel Site - approximately 6 acres located on Spring Street. Mr. Corcoran stated that this site is currently designated as Medium Density Residential. Staff does not feel this is applicable for this area. D1ore appropriate designation would be Commercial/Tourist in the hope of a=tracting a hotel or motel. b. Existing High Density Areas - Mr. Corcoran pointed out the currently designated high-density areas. .He indicated two areas of primary concern, Riverside Drive near intersection of Grand Avenue and certain portions of the downtown area. Lengthy discussion followed. Consensus was to change the remaining high density parcels to medium density. c. Bike Paths Mr. Corcoran reported that we are attempting to coordinate with the County to construct a bike lane all the way around the lake. We have applied for grants but have been told we are not eligible until we have a bicycle plan adopted by the General Plan. Page two Joint Study Session August 12, 1985 2. Areas of Concern - continued. d. Hazardous Waste areas, as mandated, are currently being worked on. e. Airport - Discussion ensued regarding changing the airport zoning from Specific Plan to Tourist/Commercial. e. Circulation Element - John Riley, Assistant Civil Engineer, reported that the Engineering Department is currently conducting a traffic control inventory, with the assistance of a consultant. In conjunction with the traffic study, the consultants are also looking at the master plan of circu- lation. The Engineering Department intends to bring the consultants recommendations to the next General Plan Amendment meeting, for review and possible adoption of a Circulation Element. 3. General Plan Amendment Study Session - It was determined that a date for a study session would be set at the next City Council meeting. ADJOURNMENT The joint study session was adjourned at 8:11 p.m. 4/ Arta Valenzuela, Mayo City of Lake Elsino Respectfully submitted, sec Ann Money, City Clerk MINUTES JOINT STUDY SESSION CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1985 * * * * * * * * * :~ * * * * * * * ~: ~: * :~ * * * * * * * * * * * ,r * * * * * ~ CALL TO ORDER The Joint Study Session of the City Council and the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore was called to order by Mayor Valenzuela at 6:38 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Washburn. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VERPIILLION, VALENZUELA COMMISSIONERS: BARNHART, DOMINGUEZ, MELLINGER, SAATHOFF, WASHBURN ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE COMMISSIONERS: NONE Also present were:- City Manager Molendyk, Assistant Planner Coleman and Deputy City Clerk Bryning. TITLE 17 DISCUSSION Assistant Planner Coleman opened the discussion by presenting the City Attorney's recommendations to the members present. There was consider- able discussion and the items revised are as follows: Section 17.01.050: At the end of the first paragraph the sentence "Not applicable to Final Maps" should be added. 2. Chapter 17.34: Change Section 17.09.020 to read the number 24 for both appartments and condominiums. This will bring both sections of the Title 17 in conformance with each other. 3. Section 17.05.030 (c) (1 ): This should read "They are kept not less than fifty 50' from any dwelling, and ten feet (10') from any property line". 4. Section 17.05.030 (c) (2): This should read "A maximum of two (2) horses are allowed per .5 acre plus one (1) horse per each additional. 10,000 square feet up to one (1) acre and two (2) horses per each additional acre". 5. Section 17.05.030: There should be an item included in this section to address restriction of .box-stalls. 6. Section 17..40.020:. A zoning map needs to be done to address this section. The map should reflect the development areas. The map .will define this section. 7. Chapter 17.46: It was suggested that this Chapter be enacted as an Emergency Ordinance. 8. Section 17.46.020: Check with the City Attorney to see if the Redeve opment Agency can be added in this area as follows: The City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore finds that .... etc. City Council asked Assistant Planner Coleman to check with the City of Carson. in regard to abatement procedures for Auto Wrecking yards. Mayor Valenzuela also asked that S.B. 605 be checked in regard to recycling and reclamation. Page two Joint Study Session September 12, 1985 9. Section 17.50.070 (D) (1) (a): This section should read "On residential properties: Only one unlighted sign per street frontage not to exceed six (6) square feet i~n area per sign face, or six (6) feet in overall height. Such sign shall be located five feet (5') inside the property line and shall be removed when the property is sold, leased or rented". The City Manager gave direction to Assistant Plahner Coleman to check Title 17, for the requirements for Service Stations to have rest rooms. 10. Section 17.07.030 (F) (2 ): This section should read "One lighted or unlighted sign per street frontage not having an area of more than six (6) square feet, and said signs shall pertain only to the prospec- tive lease or sale of only the property on which they are located, or bear only a legal notice involving said property". 11. Section 17.09.060 (D): This section should read "Area between dwellings. If separate dwellings, two-family dwellings or multiple-family dwellings are established side by side upon any lot, they shall be at least fifteen (15) feet apart for one-story buildings and twenty (20) feet apart if either building is a two-story building and if such buildings are placed in any other manner, they shall be not less than twenty (20) feet apart". 12. Section 17.08.040 (A) through (G): This section should read as follows: A. Day or night nurseries for seven. (7) or more children; B. Residential care facilities for seven (7) or more; C. Convalescent homes for ambulatory patients; D. Maternity homes; E. Rest homes for ambulatory patients; F. Private schools; G. Churches. 13. Section 17.21.090 (D): Bring Section 17.21.090 (D) in conformance with Section 17.24.090 (A) (3). 14. 17.21.090 (C) (3): This area should address low sodium lights and should require shielding for all exterior lighting. This should be brought into conformance with the other areas which address exterior lighting. The items suggested for revision to Title 17, by the City Attorney, are to be done by staff. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:55 p. m. ` `~ L/ ARTA VALENZUELA, MAYO CITY Of LAKE ELSINO Respectfully submitted, ria L. Brynin Deputy ty Cler __ P1INUTES JOINT STUDY SESSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH P1AIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, AUGUST 19, 1985 CALL TO ORDER The Joint Study Session of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, the Lake Elsinore Elementary School Board, the Elsinore High School Board and the Lake Elsinore Recreation and Park District Board was called to order by City Manager Molendyk at 6:33 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: KNIGHT, STRIGOTTE, VERMILLION, VALENZUELA HIGH SCHOOL BOARDMEMBERS: BRANTS, GIBBON, KANE, LASSITER, STRONG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOARDMEMBERS: RECREATION AND PARK BOARDMEMBERS BROWN, LAPORTE, STRUTHERS, WILSON BROWN, JOHNSON, HALLER Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Administrative Services Director Garrick, Community Development Director Corcoran, Assistant City Manager Norton, Public Works Superintendent Jones, Elsinore High School District Superintendent Chaffin, Elsinore High School District Assistant Superintendent Enserro, Lake Elsinore Elementary District Superintendent Flora, Lake Elsinore Recreation and Park District General Manager Pepin and Deputy City Clerk Bryning. DISCUSSION City Manager Molendyk opened the discussion in regard to future planning and cooperative efforts-and the school fee procedures. There was consider- able discussion in regard to all topics, by all members present. The topics were as follows: 1. Future Planning and Cooperative efforts a. Existing Facilities. b. New Facilities. c. Maintenance. d. Availability to the Community. e. Joint Powers Agreement. 2. School Fee Procedures The consensus of the group was that Managers and staff look at some short term solutions and prepare a report by the end of October. At the same time, proceed with the creation of a RFP for long term Master Planning for recreational needs. A draft Joint Powers Agreement will be formed by the Managers and their staffs and be brought back to the next study session. A study session was set for November 18, 1985 at 6:30 p. m., at City Hall in the City Council Chambers. ADJOIIRNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:53 p. m. ARTA VALENZUEL MA R CITY OF LAKE ELSINOR Page two Joint Study Session August 19, 1985 Respectfully submitted, Adria L. Bryning Deputy ty Cler MINUTES CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, DECEMBER 12, 1985 CALL TO ORDER The Study Session of the City Council was called to order by Mayor Valenzuela at 4:05 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Battalion Chief Terry Schmutz. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:. KNIGHT, MATSON, STRIGOTTE, VALENZUELA ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: VERMILLION Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Gilbert, City Engineer Keith, Community Development Director Miller, Finance Director Barrick, Public Works Superintendent Jones, Lieutenant Boyter, Riverside County Sheriff's Department, Battalion Chief Schmutz, Riverside County Fire Department and City Clerk Money. Mr. Molendyk opened the session with two announcements. 1. A news release was issued today regarding .the sale of the Water Department. 2. If Council wishes to pursue the issue of changing the position of City Treasurer from elected to appointed, it will be necessary to schedule a special meeting prior to January 10, 1986, in order to meet the County deadlines for placing a measure on the ballot. Council consensus was that this. would not be a good time and should be followed up as a possible ballot measure in a Fall, 1986 elect- ion. 3. Goals and Priorities Mr. Molendyk opened the discussion by stating that, in an effort to assure that Council and staff are in agreement on the direction each department is moving, a list of projects has been compiled by order of priority, including an approximate date for completion. There are one- hundred-fifty-two (152) projects listed and these are in addition to the normal day to day functions of the City. The projects were reviewed by department and the following changes and/or additions were made: Citv.Manaaer 1) CM-4 - Personnel Rules Manual - Delete. Consultant - Complete In- House - Revise completion date. 2) CM-5 - Lake Management - Add Land Use plan. 3) CM-8 - Change to - Redevelopment Agency Annexation Dates (Report - January, 1986). 4) Add - Signing of Lake perimeter. 5) Add - Review and make recommendations regarding private contractor operating the Lake Elsinore Transit System. Page two City Clerk 1) CC-8 - Delete (Covered under City Manager). 2) CC-9 - Clean out snake pit - Amend completion date to 3-30-86. Administrative Services 1) AD-6 Installation of Security System - Amend completion date to 3-30-86. 2) AD-9 - Add - Renegotiate trash contract (Bring back report) Community Develobment 1) Add - General Plan Amendments GPA 85-8 AND °Area A° of GPA 85-10 and Airport Zoning - March, 1986. Enaineerina 1) EG-104 - Collier Street Sewer Assessment District Boundaries - Move to Short-Range Goals - Completion date - 5-31-86. 2) Add to Long-Range Goals - Freeway Drainage Study Realignment of Highway 74 Intersection of Collier and Highway 74 The City Engineer requested Council consider establishing a Coun- cil Policy Committee. Public Works 1) PW-25 - Ballpark, bleachers and snackbar repair - Change start date to 2-1-86 and completion date to 3-1-86. Recreation and Parks 1) Add - Prepare Joint Powers Agreement. between School District and Park District. 2) Add - Establish non-resident usage fees (after Little League Season). Fire Department Battalion Chief Schmutz commented that the Fire Department will be providing more input regarding developments in the City. Also, there is a need for a fire station at the west end of the lake. 4. summary Mr. Gilbert indicated he would prepare a revised priorities list reflecting the suggested changes. 5. Adjournment The Study Session was adjourned at 5:58 p.m. ABTA VALENZUE , MAYOR CITY OF LAKE INORE Respectfully submitted, J Ann Money, City Cle c