HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/01/07 PC Reports
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
TO:
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DA TE:
MAY 1, 2007
PREPARED BY:
JUSTIN CARLSON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
PROJECT TITLE:
MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) THREE-
STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS
LOCATED AT 16782 & 16784 LASH AVENUE
(APN'S: 378-263-023/024)
APPLICANT:
HECTOR ZUBIETAlZENOS INC.: 38372
INNOVATION COURT, SUITE 204, MURRIETA,
CA 92563
OWNER:
YOK TAN: 111 MOHR STREET, LAKE
ELSINORE, CA 92530
PROJECT REQUEST
The applicant is requesting design review consideration of two (2) three-story
conventionally built single-family dwelling units located at 16782 and 16784 Lash
Avenue (APN's: 378-263-023/024). Review is pursuant to Chapter 17.23 (R-1, Sing1e-
Family Residential), Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential
Development Standards), and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC).
BACKGROUND
The Design Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the plans for the two (2) proposed
single-family dwelling units and provided several substantive comments on the
proposed architectural design, fencing, landscaping, structure heights, and retaining
walls. Once revised, the applicant re-submitted plans along with building elevations for
the two (2) proposed homes, which incorporated the recommendations that were
suggested by the DRC.
AGENDA ITEM NO. ,.)..
Pi\Gl: I 01=_ Ja.9
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 1, 2007
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) THREE-
STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS
LOCATED AT 16782 & 16784 LASH AVENUE (APN'S:
378-263-023/024)
On April 3, 2007, the Planning Commission continued the item to the April 17, 2007
regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting. There were two (2) reasons why
the Planning Commission voted to continue the item, they are as follows: first (1), was
the issue of the availability of water necessary to serve the project site. Although the
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) provided staff with written
verification that there were two (2) fire hydrants within the existing shopping center
directly across the street that could serve the project site, the Planning Commission had
accessibility concerns with having to cross property lines and existing fencing to gain
access to the existing fire hydrants. The second reason for the continuance was relative
to the proposed rear retaining walls and slopes. For the proposed single-family
dwelling units located at 16782 and 16784 Lash Avenue, the applicant was proposing
two (2) retaining walls that would be connecting to two (2) existing retaining walls on
the adjacent property. The developer, however, for the adjacent property did not
construct their retaining walls pursuant to the original approval. Specifically, the
developer for the adjacent property constructed a single retaining wall approximately
ten-feet (10') high in place of two (2) staggered retaining walls. Due to this conflict
between the two (2) proposed walls and the existing single wall, the applicant for the
proposed two (2) single-family dwelling units located at 16782 and 16784 Lash
Avenue needed to revise his grading plan accordingly.
On April 17, 2007 the Planning Commission continued the item for a second time to
the May 1, 2007 Planning Commission meeting. The second continuance was
necessary in order to allow the applicant to have more time to address the concerns that
were voiced at the April 3, 2007 regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting.
WATER AVAILABILITY /FIRE FLOW ISSUES
The proposed dwelling units located at 16782 and 16784 Lash Avenue are located
within Country Club Heights. Staff routed the plans to the Riverside County Fire
Department for their review on October 2, 2006. Staff did not receive any comments
and/or conditions of approval. The Fire Department staff did not attend the City's DRC
meeting on November 13, 2006. The applicant notified staff that the Elsinore Water
District's 'will serve' letter and plans were submitted to the Fire Department for
AGENDA ITEM d
PAGEaOF~O
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 1, 2007
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) THREE-
STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS
LOCATED AT 16782 & 16784 LASH AVENUE (APN'S:
378-263-023/024)
review. He indicated that the Fire Department was unable to assist him in ascertaining
comments and/or conditions of approval as well as reviewing his Elsinore Water
District's 'will serve' letter for fire flow approval. He then advised staff that the
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) has two (2) fire hydrants within
the vicinity of the project and believes that those two (2) fire hydrants would satisfy
staff s concerns regarding minimum adequate water pressure and water availability.
Staff asked the applicant to provide the necessary information and paperwork
regarding the two (2) fire hydrants and pending the information provided from
EVMWD, staff would move forward to Planning Commission.
On February 8, 2007, the applicant submitted a letter to the Community Development
Department from EVMWD that was addressed to the Riverside County Fire
Department. The letter stated that there are two (2) existing residential fire hydrants
located approximately 365-feet from the proposed homes (please see Attachment # 5) .
The letter went on to state that the two (2) existing EVMWD fire hydrants are 6" with
a 2-1/2" and a 4" outlet. The existing water line within Lash Avenue is a 24" line and
minimum fire flow can be achieved at 500 gallons per minute (GPM). It should be
noted that the 'will serve" letter submitted by the applicant from the Elsinore Water
District (EWD) indicates that the agency has a "Warfhead" fire hydrant located
approximately 675-feet with a flow of 1,000 gallons per minute from the project site.
By having EVMWD's two (2) fire hydrants as well as Elsinore Water District's
(EWD) existing "Warfhead" hydrant in close proximity to the project site, staff
accommodated the applicant by moving the project forward for Planning Commission
review with an attached Condition of Approval stating that the applicant shall comply
with all requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department.
On April 9, 2007, the applicant provided a letter from the Elsinore Water District
(EWD) stating that the water district has sufficient water to service the proposed
dwelling units at present. The applicant has agreed to purchase an approved standard
fire hydrant (6" X 4" X 2 ~"), the hydrant would be located approximately 200-feet
from the project site. Once the fire hydrant is installed and on-line, EWD states that a
minimum fire flow shall be 500 GPM for a two (2) hour duration at a 20-PSI residual
(Please see attachment 6). To ensure that there will not be any confusion with possible
AGENDA ITEM 1
PAGE 3 OF -feO
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 1, 2007
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) THREE-
STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS
LOCATED AT 16782 & 16784 LASH AVENUE (APN'S:
378-263-023/024)
occupancy of the proposed dwelling units and the installation of the standard fire
hydrant, staff has added a condition of approval stating that the standard (6" X 4" X 2
~") fire hydrant shall be installed and on-line within 200-feet of the project site, prior
to the issuance of a building permit.
On April 18, 2007, the applicant submitted ten (10) sets of the revised preliminary
grading and drainage plan for the proposed single-family dwelling units located at
16782 and 16784 Lash Avenue. A further analysis of the revised plans is reflected in
the Siting section of the staff report below.
PROJECT LOCATION
The proposed existing vacant lots are generally located 450 linear-feet southeast ofthe
Morberg Street and Lash Avenue intersection at 16782 and 16784 Lash Avenue.
Furthermore, the project site is located within the R-l (Single-Family Residential)
Zoning District and has a General Plan designation of Future Specific Plan J (Country
Club Heights #1) (APN'S: 378-263-023/024).
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Project Sites
South
Vacant R-l (Single-Family Specific Plan J
Residential)
Residential R-I (Single-Family Specific Plan J
Residential
Commercial C-l (Neighborhood Specific Plan J
Commercial
Vacant R-I (Single-Family Specific Plan J
Residential)
Vacant R-I (Single-Family Specific Plan J
Residential
North
East
West
AGENDA ~TEM d-
PAGE ~ OF~
~~
''-,
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 1, 2007
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) THREE-
STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS
LOCATED AT 16782 & 16784 LASH AVENUE (APN'S:
378-263-023/024)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting design review consideration for the design and
establishment oftwo (2) conventionally built three-story single-family dwelling units
located at 16782 and 16784 Lash Avenue. The layout of the proposed dwelling units is
as follows:
16782 Lash Avenue
The proposed dwelling unit located at 16782 Lash Avenue will have a two (2) car
garage and storage area on the ground floor. The first-floor living area will have a
front-entrance porch, living room, dining room, kitchen, family room, one (1)
bathroom, a patio, and balcony. The second-floor living area will have two (2)
bedrooms, a bathroom, a laundry room, a master bedroom with hallway closets, master
bathroom, and balcony. Furthermore, the total building footprint for the proposed
dwelling unit located at 16782 Lash Avenue, which includes the proposed garage floor,
first-floor living area, and second-floor living area will be approximately forty-two
percent (42%).
16784 Lash Avenue
The proposed dwelling unit located at 16784 Lash A venue will have a two (2) car
garage and storage area on the ground floor. The first-floor living area will have a
front-entrance porch, living room, dining room, kitchen, family room, a patio, a
balcony, and one (1) bathroom. The second-floor living area will have two (2)
bedrooms, a laundry closet, a bathroom, and a master bedroom with hallway closets,
master bathroom, and deck. Furthermore, the total building footprint for the proposed
dwelling unit located at 16784 Lash Avenue, which includes the proposed garage floor,
first-floor living area, and second-floor living area will be approximately forty-two
percent (42%).
It should be noted that the proposed dwelling units located at 16782 and 16784 Lash
Avenue comply with the maximum lot coverage requirement of fifty-percent (50%) as
AGENDA ITEM d-
PAGE S OF liLo
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 1, 2007
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) THREE-
STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS
LOCATED AT 16782 & 16784 LASH AVENUE (APN'S:
378-263-023/024)
outlined in Chapter 17.23.090 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). The
applicant is also proposing to connect to the new sewer system that is currently being
constructed and staff has conditioned the applicant to submit a 'will serve' letter for the
service of sewer and water, prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Siting
16782 Lash Avenue
The two (2) proposed three-story single-family dwelling units will be located on a
relatively hilly location of Lash Avenue. In order to develop the properties, the
applicant will have to conduct extensive grading and utilize retaining walls in order to
create buildable stepped-pads for development. For the proposed dwelling unit located
at 16782 Lash Avenue, the applicant is proposing to cut approximately 910 cubic-yards
of earth from the slope. The rear of the lot will have two (2) retaining walls that
connect to an existing wall on the northwest comer of the adjacent lot, via a stem wall
that runs to the front ofthe subject lot. The stem wall is approximately ten feet (10') in
height at connection and decreases to approximately eight feet (8') as it reaches the
proposed walls on the subject lot. It should be noted that the stem wall has an
approximate linear length of eight feet (8 ').
The applicant is proposing a two (2) wall system in order to achieve a "stepped or
tiered" affect, thus ultimately lowering the overall appearance of the retaining wall
system. The main wall, closest to the proposed dwelling unit, will be approximately
eight feet (8') in height as it progresses the length of the property, from northwest to
northeast. The second retaining wall, which is the furthest from the proposed dwelling
unit, will be approximately two feet (2') in height as it progresses the length of the
property from northwest to northeast. It should be noted that the rear retaining wall,
closest to the subject dwelling unit, will be set back a minimum of fifteen feet (15')
from the rear wall of the house. This complies with section 17.23.080 of the LEMC,
which mandates that finished slopes in excess of five percent (5%) shall not be
permitted within fifteen feet (15') of the main dwelling unit.
AGENDA ITEM d-
PAGE~OF~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 1, 2007
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) THREE-
STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS
LOCATED AT 16782 & 16784 LASH AVENUE (APN'S:
378-263-023/024)
Furthermore, the applicant's property extends approximately forty-four feet (44') past
the rear retaining walls and has been conditioned to not exceed a grade of two-to-one
(2-1). In addition, the applicant is also proposing to landscape and automatically
irrigate all slopes to assist in slope stability.
16784 Lash Avenue
The proposed dwelling unit located at 16784 Lash Avenue will also be required to cut
approximately 910 cubic-yards of earth from the slope. The rear of the lot will have
also have a two (2) retaining wall system that is an extension of the two (2) retaining
wall system located on 16782 Lash Avenue. The main wall, closest to the dwelling
unit, be approximately eight feet (8') in height and will decrease to approximately six-
feet (6') in height as it progresses the length of the property, from northwest to
northeast. The second wall, which is the most distant from the proposed dwelling unit,
will be approximately two-feet (2') in height as it runs the length of the property. It
should be noted that the second retaining wall will cease approximately halfway across
the property and will turn southwest to connect to the main retaining wall. The
northeast interior property line retaining wall will be approximately six-feet (6') in
height and will run along the northeast interior property line and will cease at the rear
ofthe house. It should be noted that the rear retaining wall will be set back a minimum
of fifteen-feet (15') from the rear wall of the house. This complies with section
17.23.080, which mandates that finished slopes in excess of five percent (5%) shall not
be permitted within fifteen feet (15') of the main dwelling unit.
Furthermore, the applicant's property extends approximately forty- four feet (44') past
the rear retaining walls and has been conditioned to not exceed a grade of two-to-one
(2-1). In addition, the applicant is also proposing to landscape and automatically
irrigate all slopes to assist in slope stability.
AGENDA ITEM ~
PAGE20F~O
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 1, 2007
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) THREE-
STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS
LOCATED AT 16782 & 16784 LASH AVENUE (APN'S:
378-263-023/024)
Architecture
16782 Lash Avenue
The applicant is proposing to include Spanish style architecture for the proposed
single-family dwelling unit located at 16782 Lash Avenue. The south (front) elevation
will include an "S" -tile roof, Spanish style coach lights, an arched front-entry door
with windows on the right side, Spanish-style columns, a "Rosette" foam vent, cultured
stone veneer wainscot, arched windows with lites and surrounds, wrought-iron fencing
with gate, ornamental first-floor porch and second floor deck wrought-iron fencing,
and an arched decorative garage door.
The north elevation (rear) will include window surrounds, a coach light, a "Rosette"
foam attic vent, and a sliding rear entry window. The west (interior) elevation will
include windows with divided lites and surrounds, a "Rosette" attic vent, and a
cultured stone veneer base in front of the side entry gate. The east (interior) elevation
will include a "Rosette" foam attic vent and windows with divided lites and surrounds.
The east and west interior elevations will have a six foot (6') high wood fence that will
connect to an existing six foot (6') fence that is located at the rear of the property.
Furthermore, the applicant is proposing decorative fencing, on both sides ofthe subject
property, which runs from the house to the front of the property along Lash Avenue.
The wall will be solid stuccoed block with open wrought-iron fencing on top and a
decorative pilaster with cap approximately every ten feet (10 '). It should be noted that
the overall height of the front-yard fencing will not exceed a height of five feet (5') and
will be stuccoed to match the proposed stucco on the dwelling unit.
16784 Lash Avenue
The applicant is proposing to include Monterey style architecture for the proposed
single-family dwelling unit located at 16784 Lash Avenue. The south (front) elevation
will include an "S"-tile roof, Monterey style coach lights, decorative front-entry door
with windows on the left side, Monterey-style columns, cultured stone veneer
AGENDA ITEM~-
PAGE~OF~O
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 1, 2007
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) THREE-
STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS
LOCATED AT 16782 & 16784 LASH AVENUE (APN'S:
378-263-023/024)
wainscot, windows with lites and shutters, stucco block pilasters with gates, first-floor
porch and second floor deck wood fencing, and a decorative garage door.
The north elevation (rear) will include windows surrounds with lites and a sliding rear
entry window. The west and east (interior) elevations will include windows with
divided lites and shutters.
The east and west interior elevations will have a six foot (6') high wood fence that will
connect to an existing six foot (6') fence that is located at the rear of the property.
Furthermore, the applicant is proposing decorative fencing, on both sides ofthe subject
property, which runs from the house to the front of the property along Lash A venue.
The wall will be solid stuccoed block with open wrought-iron fencing on top and a
decorative pilaster with cap approximately every ten feet (10'). It should be noted that
the overall height ofthe front-yard fencing will not exceed a height offive feet (5') and
will be stuccoed to match the proposed stucco on the dwelling unit.
Landscaving
16782 Lash Avenue
The applicant is only proposing to landscape and irrigate the front-yard. Front-yard
landscaping will include "Yellow Gazania" groundcover, three (3) fifteen (15) gallon
"Crape Myrtle" trees, and eleven (11) five (5) gallon "Glossy Abelia" shrubs. All
landscaping will be automatically irrigated and will include a rain sensor, which will
assist in the conservation of water. Furthermore and pursuant to Section 5.78 of the
LEMC, the applicant is proposing to incorporate existing palm trees located along Lash
Avenue into his front-yard landscaping.
It should be noted that the applicant will also be required to automatically irrigate and
landscape all slopes greater than five feet (5 '). All landscaping and irrigation will have
to be installed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
AGENDMTEM 2
P AGE ~ OF 1R.P
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 1, 2007
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) THREE-
STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS
LOCATED AT 16782 & 16784 LASH AVENUE (APN'S:
378-263-023/024)
16784 Lash Avenue
The applicant is only proposing to landscape and irrigate the front-yard. Front-yard
landscaping will include "Yellow Gazania" groundcover, three (3) fifteen (15) gallon
"Crape Myrtle" trees, and eleven (11) five (5) gallon "Glossy Abelia" shrubs. All
landscaping will be automatically irrigated and will include a rain sensor, which will
assist in the conservation of water. Furthermore and pursuant to Section 5.78 of the
LEMC, the applicant is proposing to incorporate existing palm trees located along Lash
Avenue into his front-yard landscaping.
It should be noted that the applicant will also be required to automatically irrigate and
landscape all slopes greater than five feet (5 '). All landscaping and irrigation will have
to be installed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
Color and Materials
Roof
Wall
Fascia Board
S tone Veneer
'S"-tile
Capistrano "Valencia" style
"C stal White"
"Hone suckle Coral"
"Mo' ave"
Stucco
Wood
Cultured Stone
Roof
Stucco wall & trim
Fascia/wood trim/Brackets/
shutters
Stone Veneer
'S'- tile
W ood/S tucco
Wood
"Grey Brown Range"
"Adobe"
"Basque Brown"
Cultured Stone
"Walnut"
AGENDA ITEM 2
PAGE ~ OF l1L d
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 1, 2007
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) THREE-
STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS
LOCATED AT 16782 & 16784 LASH AVENUE (APN'S:
378-263-023/024)
ANALYSIS
Staff has reviewed the proposed single-family dwelling units located 16782 and 16784
Lash Avenue and found that with the attached conditions of approval, the project meets
all minimum requirements of Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14
(Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.23 (Single-family Residential), and
Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) ofthe Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC)
including but not limited to; density, setbacks, landscaping, parking, and lot coverage.
Siting
16782 Lash Avenue
The total building footprint for the proposed dwelling unit located at 16782 Lash
Avenue, which includes the proposed garage floor, first-floor living area, and second-
floor living area will be approximately forty-two percent (42%), which is below the
maximum lot coverage of fifty percent (50%) as outlined in Chapter 17.23.090 ofthe
LEMC. In addition, the site plan will meet all applicable development standards and
criteria outlined in the R-l (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District and the
Residential Development Standards outlined in the LEMC.
16542 Gunnerson Street
The total building footprint for the proposed dwelling unit located at 16784 Lash
Avenue, which includes the proposed garage floor, first-floor living area, and second-
floor living area will be approximately forty-two percent (42%), which is below the
maximum lot coverage of fifty percent (50%) as outlined in Chapter 17.23.090 of the
LEMC. In addition, the site plan will meet all applicable development standards and
criteria outlined in the R-l (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District and the
Residential Development Standards outlined in the LEMC.
AGENDA ITEM d-
PAGElLOF ~o
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 1, 2007
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) THREE-
STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS
LOCATED AT 16782 & 16784 LASH AVENUE (APN'S:
378-263-023/024)
Architecture
The proposed architecture of the single-family dwelling units located at 16782 and
16784 Lash Avenue are consistent with the style and design of existing single-family
dwelling units within Country Club Heights. The proposed colors and materials to be
incorporated are consistent with the goals and intent of the architectural design
guidelines of the General Plan's Community Design Element, in that the proposed
residence provides an aesthetic quality that lends to the overall achievement of a well
balanced R-l (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District.
Landscaping
The minimum landscape coverage requirements for in- fill single-family dwelling unit's
states that the applicant landscape the front-yard with an automatic irrigation system as
outlined in Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards). The applicant has met
this requirement by proposing a fully landscaped, automatically irrigated front yard.
Furthermore the applicant is proposing to incorporate a rain sensor for both single-
family dwelling units, which will assist in the conservation of water. It should also be
noted that the applicant is proposing to irrigate and landscape all slopes greater than
five feet (5').
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15332(In-Fill
Development Projects), staff has determined that the proposed project will not have a
significant affect on the environment and shall therefore be exempt from the provisions
of CEQA. Therefore no additional environmental clearance is necessary.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2007-_
approving the proposed two (2) single-family dwelling units based on the Findings,
Exhibits, and the proposed Conditions of Approval.
AGENDA ITEM d--.
PAGE ld-oF~O
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 1, 2007
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) THREE-
STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS
LOCATED AT 16782 & 16784 LASH AVENUE (APN'S:
378-263-023/024)
PREPARED BY:
JUSTIN CARLSON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
APPROVED BY:
ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ATTACHMENTS:
1. VICINITY MAP
2. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
3. PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
4. CEQA-NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
5. ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
(EVMWD) LETTER TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE
DEPARTMENT
6. ELSINORE WATER DISTRICT LETTER DATED APRIL 9, 2007
7. SIGNED ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF DRAFT CONDITIONS OF
APPROV AL
8. SITE PLAN (16782 LASH AVENUE)
9. GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (16782 LASH AVENUE)
10. FLOOR PLAN-GARAGE & FIRST FLOOR (16782 LASH
A VENUE)
11. FLOOR PLAN-SECOND FLOOR (16782 LASH AVENUE)
12. ELEVATIONS (16782 LASH AVENUE)
13. ROOF PLAN (16782 LASH AVENUE)
14. SECTION PLAN (16782 LASH AVENUE)
15. FINISH DETAILS (16782 LASH AVENUE)
16. MATERIALS SHEET (16782 LASH AVENUE)
17. SITE PLAN (16784 LASH AVENUE)
18. GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (16784 LASH AVENUE)
19. FLOOR PLAN-GARAGE & FIRST FLOOR (16784 LASH
A VENUE)
AGENDA ITEM d-
PAGE 12. OF T.Q::o
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 1, 2007
PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) THREE-
STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS
LOCATED AT 16782 & 16784 LASH AVENUE (APN'S:
378-263-023/024)
20. FLOOR PLAN-SECOND FLOOR PLAN (16784 LASH AVENUE)
21. ELEVATIONS (16784 LASH AVENUE)
22. ROOF PLAN (16784 LASH AVENUE)
23. SECTION PLAN (16784 LASH AVENUE)
24. FINISH DETAILS (16784 LASH AVENUE)
25. MATERIALS SHEET (16784 LASH AVENUE)
26. FULL SIZE SETS OF PLANS (16782 & 16784 LASH AVENUE)
AGENDA ITEM ~
PAGE~OFkO
VICINITY MAP
MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) SINGLE-FAMILY
DWELLING UNITS LOCATED AT 16782 & 16784
LASH AVENUE
/ ,t
~
~
~
'-.f
~
~/'J
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA nEM NO. ?-
PAGE--!~ OF 00
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR TWO
(2) SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS
WHEREAS, Hector Zubieta, Zenos Inc., has filed an application with the
City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for two (2)
conventionally built three-story single-family dwelling units with attached two (2)
car garages on property located at 16782 and 16784 Lash Avenue (APN'S: 378-
263-023/024) (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has
been delegated with the responsibility of considering and approving, conditionally
approving, or denying Minor Design Review requests for residential projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public meeting held with respect to
this item on May 1, 2007.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE,
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed
design for the Project and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds
and determines that the Project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code.
SECTION 2. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the
Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
(Cal. Pub. Res. Code ~~ 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14
C.C.R. ~~ 15000 et seq.) pursuant to a class 32 exemption for In-Fill Development
Projects (14 C.C.R. ~ 15332) because the Project involve the construction of two
(2) three-story single-family dwelling units within City limits on lots of no more
than five (5) acres, which are surrounded by urban uses and have no value as
habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The Project will not result in
any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality and the
homes can be served by all required utilities and public services.
ACfNDA m:M NO. J- ..
PAGE~" OF ~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-
PAGE20F4
SECTION 3. That in accordance with Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
Chapter 17.82, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the
approval of the Project:
1. The Project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the
intended General Plan and the Zoning District in which the Project will be
located.
The Project complies with the goals and objectives of General Plan
designation Specific Plan J (Country Club heights No.1) as well as the R-1
(Single-Family Residential) Zoning District. General Plan designation
Specific Plan J is intended to provide a wide range of housing densities and
some limited commercial and industrial uses. Furthermore, Table III-5
(General Plan/Zoning Compatibility Matrix) within the General Plan
identifies that the General Plan designation Future Specific Plan J (Country
Club Heights No.1) is compatible with the R-1 (Single-Family Residential)
Zoning District. In addition, the Future Specific Plan J General Plan
designation mandates that the average residential density will be six (6)
dwelling units to the acre. By proposing one (1) single-family residence
with attached garage, the Project(s) located at 16782 and 16784 Lash
Avenue will cover approximately forty-two percent (42%) of the net lot area
respectively and is in compliance with the goals and objectives of the Future
Specific Plan J designation of the General Plan, R-1 (Single-Family
Residential) Zoning District, and the General Plan/Zoning Compatibility
Matrix.
Approval of this Project will assist in achieving the development of a well
balanced and functional mix of residential, limited commercial, limited
industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses by providing
additional affordable housing within the R-1 (Single-Family Residential)
Zoning District Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The Project(s) also
encourages the development and maintenance of a broad range of housing
types for all income groups and age categories. Finally, the Project(s),
which incorporates elements of "Spanish" and "Monterey" style
architecture, will provide a well rounded design while maintaining the
desirable rural characteristics and base framework to achieve quality and
compatibility in the physical design of the developing portions of the City.
Overall, the Project(s) will enhance the existing developed areas within
General Plan designation Future Specific Plan J and Zoning Designation R-
1 (Single-Family Residential) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
ACENDA NO. ~
PACE l ( OF. Coo
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-
PAGE30F4
2. The Project complies with the design directives contained in Section
17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The Project located at 16782 and 16784 Lash Avenue are appropriate to the
site and surrounding developments in that the proposed single-family
dwelling units have provided: a twenty foot (20') front-yard setback; a fifty-
seven foot (57') and fifty-nine foot (59') rear-yard setback; sufficient front
yard landscaping; and, safe and sufficient on-site vehicular circulation.
In addition, the Project complies with all setback, height, and lot coverage
requirements as outlined in the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning
District of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
Further, the Project as proposed will complement the quality of existing
projects in that the applicant is providing elements of "Spanish" and
"Monterey" style architecture which includes: 360-degree architecture
articulation pursuant to the "General Plan, Community Design Element
Design Guidelines"; decorative style window surrounds with divided
window lites; decorative entry doors with windows, coach lights,
ledgers tone veneer; and "s" - tile roofs.
3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the Project is not anticipated
to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
15332, the Projects located at 16782 and 16784 Lash Avenue is exempt from
environmental review because it involves the construction of two (2) single-
family residences and an attached garages in a residential zone. Therefore,
no further environmental analysis is required. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, however, the attached conditions of approval incorporate design
features into the Project which suggest that the Project will not have a
significant effect on the environment.
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning
Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions,
have been incorporated into the approval of the Project to ensure
development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter
17.82.
Pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.82.070, the Project
has been scheduled for consideration and action of the Planning
ACENDA iTeM NO. ?--
PACE~OF . ~ 0 _
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-
PAGE40F4
Commission. The Project has also been conditioned to comply with all
aspects of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The Applicant shall meet all
required setbacks and development standards pursuant to the R -1 (Single-
Family Residential) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC).
SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and
the conditions of approval, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Minor
Design Review application.
SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1 st day of May 2007, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
ATTEST:
Rolfe Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
AcrNDJ.\ ITC.\l NO.
PAGE 19
)-.
Or- to 0
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PROJECT NAME:
MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO (2) SINGLE-
FAMILY DWELLING UNITS LOCATED AT 16782
AND 16784 LASH AVENUE (APN'S: 378-263-
023/024)
PLANNING DIVISION
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and
hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any
claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees
or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the Minor
Design Review project attached hereto.
2. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final fifteen (15) days from
the date of the decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Council
pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.80 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code.
3. If the project proposes an outdoor storage tank, the applicant shall locate the
unit within the side or rear yards. If location must be within the front yard, the
applicant shall provide a method of screening subject to the review and
approval of the Director of Community Development or his designee.
4. Minor Design Review approval of two (2) single-family dwelling units located
at 16782 and 16784 Lash Avenue (APN'S: 378-263-023/024) will lapse and
become void one (1) year of the approval date unless a building permit is issued
and construction commenced and the project is diligently being pursued toward
completion.
5. All Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced upon page one of building
plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division for Plan Check.
\'OA "'... "'\~
~~:n.. '~.i.~ ~
AGt"., _'. I.'n__ .... ~ .
PACE_~ ,OF_ d_
6. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall sign and
complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions," and shall return the executed
original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case
records.
7. All materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used
unless modified by the Applicant and approved by the Community
Development Director or designee.
8. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site
plan and elevations, with revisions as noted herein. The applicant shall meet all
required setbacks, and development standards pursuant to the R-I (Single-
Family Residential) development standards. Any revisions to the Minor Design
Review attached hereto shall be processed in a similar manner as the original
Minor Design Review. All plans submitted for Building Division plan check
shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by the Conditions of
Approval.
9. All windows shall use foam surrounds and/or other architectural-type features
approved by the Community Development Director or designee.
10.All necessary exterior/ancillary equipment shall be effectively screened from
public view. All proposed screening methods shall be reviewed and approved
the Community Developer Director or designee.
11.All roofing materials shall have a minimum Class "A" Fire rating, and so noted
on the construction plans.
12. The Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances.
l3.A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers placed
on the site and used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal
of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to the
approval of the Community Development Director or designee.
l4.The Applicant shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. Construction
activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through
Friday, and no construction activity shall occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal
holidays.
PlI.CE_
i ; -0 :;).-
~I' OF_. (,0
AGCf\D)\
15. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading
Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in
accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using
accepted control techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided
thirty (30) days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer.
16.Any exterior air conditioning or other mechanical equipment shall be ground
mounted and screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property or
public streets. Air conditioning units and related equipment may not encroach
more than two-feet (2') into the required minimum side yard setback.
17. Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum interior clear space of
twenty feet (20') x twenty feet (20') for two cars.
18. The Applicant shall provide shrubs and plant materials as shown on the
landscape plan. Any changes to this plan shall be subject to the approval of the
Community Development Director or designee. The landscape plan
improvements and plantings shall be fully installed prior to issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
1 9. Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than
36 inches.
20.Driveways shall be constructed of concrete per Building and Safety Division
standards.
21.All walls or fences located in any front yard shall not exceed thirty-six inches
(36") in height with the exception that wrought-iron fences may be five feet (5')
in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited.
22. The applicant shall be required to remove and replace any existing chain link
fencing and any fencing that is in poor condition. It will be the responsibility of
the applicant to contact the effected neighboring property owners. If the
existing fencing is in good condition, this requirement may be waived per the
approval of the Community Development Director or Designee.
23.The applicant shall provide a flat concrete pad a minimum of 3'- 0" by 7'- 0"
adjacent to each dwelling unit. The storage pad for trash barrels shall be
concealed from public view.
ACi:NDJ\ NO.;;>-
PACE ~ OF 00 __..
24. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $64.00 made payable to the
County of Riverside for a Notice of Exemption. The check shall be submitted to
the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the projects approval.
25. The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the
project site identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity and
a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City
of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division (951) 674-3124.
26. The proposed fencing located within the front-yard setback shall not exceed a
maximum height of five feet (5'); three feet (3') solid two feet (2') open.
Furthermore, the solid block and pilasters shall be stuccoed to match the stucco
as proposed on the dwelling units.
27.All exposed block walls visible from Lash Avenue shall utilize a split-face
block or be stuccoed to match the main dwelling unit.
28. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Riverside County Fire
Department.
29. The applicant is to meet all requirements of Southern California Edison.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
30.All walls and/or fencing need to be located off the property line and so
indicated on the construction plans. If the Applicant proposes to place any walls
and/or fencing on the property line he/she must submit a notarized agreement
between the subject property owner and the adjacent property owner to the
Planning Department prior to issuance of a building permit.
31. The applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore
Unified School District have been paid prior to issuance of building permits.
32. The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees in effect at the time prior to issuance of
building permits.
33.The applicant shall provide assurances to the Planning Division that all
requirements and fees of the Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District have been met.
AGHJDA ITEM NO.
PACE .9-3_ OF
d-
<R 0 ..
34. The applicant shall pay the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee
(MSHCP) Local Development Mitigation Fee (fee for density less than 8 dulac)
prior to obtaining building permits.
35.Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Project, the Developer shall
enter into an agreement with the City and the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Lake Elsinore to provide (a) 15% of the units constructed in the Project
as affordable housing units in accordance with the requirements of Section
33413(b )(2) of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health &
Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.), or (b) an alternative equivalent action as
determined by the City which may include (without limitation) dedication of
vacant land, construction of affordable units on another site, or payment of an
in-lieu fee at the rate of $2.00 per square-foot of assessable space for each
dwelling unit in the Project. For purposes of this condition, "assessable space"
means all of the square-footage within the perimeter of a structure, not
including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio,
detached accessory structure, or similar area. The amount of the square-footage
within the perimeter of a residential structure shall be calculated by the building
department of the City in accordance with the standard practice of the City in
calculating structural perimeters.
36.Prior to the issuance of a building permit the Applicant shall obtained and
submit a "will serve" letter from Elsinore Municipal Water District to the
satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. The "will serve" letter
shall specifically indicate the specific water flow volumes for both domestic
and fire protection water supply.
37.The applicant shall pay all applicable Library Capital Improvement Fund fees,
prior to the issuance of a building permit.
38.The applicant/developer shall submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Planning
Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer
arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for
the water service at the location. such as water pressure and volume etc. The
applicant shall submit this letter indicating that water and sewer arrangements
have been made, prior to applying for a building permit.
t,C;':fY\~i, NO. )..
PAGE_~LOF Coo
39.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall revise the site plan
to indicate that all front elevation decks facing Lash A venue are pulled back out
of the required twenty foot (20') front-yard setback.
40.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall revise the
elevations page to identify where keynote number twelve (12) is located.
4l.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide assurances
to the Community Development Department indicating that sewer arrangements
have been made for the two (2) single-family dwelling units located 16782 and
16784 Lash Avenue.
42.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, there shall be a standard (6" X 4" X 2
~") fire hydrant installed and fully operational and within 200- feet of the
project site.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
43.The Applicant shall plant twenty-four inch (24") box street trees along all street
frontages selected from the City Street Tree List, a maximum of thirty feet (30')
apart. Planting is subject to the approval of the Community Development
Director or designee prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
44. The applicant shall provide an irrigation system for landscaped areas onsite as
shown on the landscape plans. The irrigation system shall be fully installed and
operational prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
45. The Applicant shall provide a rain sensor as shown on the landscape plan. The
rain censor shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
46.All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have permanent
irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, as approved by the
City's Landscape Architect. A Planting and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted,
approved and planted prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Fees
are required for review of plans and inspections.
47. The building address shall be a minimum of four inches (4 ") high and shall be
easily visible from the public right-of-way. Care shall be taken to select colors
and materials that contrast with building walls or trim. Installation of building
AGHJDA ITfM NO. ;)-
P;'iG~ _OF i.oR;
--
address shall be done prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
48. The applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
GENERAL
49.All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of
development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to
building permit.
50. The applicant shall submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering
Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer
arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for
the water service at the location. such as water pressure and volume etc.
Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit.
51.All arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles,
vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the
property owner or his agent.
52. The applicant shall provide fire protection access and facilities as required in
writing by Riverside County Fire.
53.In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal &
recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Incorporated
for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other
rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other
phases of construction.
54. The applicant shall protect all palm trees in place or contact the Community
Services of City of Lake Elsinore for Palm Tree Preservation Program, LEMC
5.78 Ordinance 1044.
55.All grading and street improvement plans submitted to engineering shall be
drawn on 24" x 36" Mylar and be set into City's specific border and title block
and include city specific general notes for grading or street improvements
AGENDA ITE~il NO._ d-
PACE ~ OF (aJ))
respectively. All digital files for the border and the notes are available by
request to "agutierrez@lake-elsinore.org".
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
56.All work done under an encroachment permit for off-site improvements of
utility lines shall be delineated on the street improvement plans and approved
and signed by the City Engineer, prior to issuance of building permits.
57. The applicant shall pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment
permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of off-site public
works improvements (LEMC12.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for
an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy.
GRADING
58. The developer shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading
from the adjacent property owners prior to issuance of grading permit approval.
59. The applicant shall apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security
prior to any grading activity.
60.A grading plan stamped/signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer is
required if the sum of the cut and fill in grading exceeds 50 cubic yards and the
existing drainage flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the
City Engineer. The grading plan shall show volumes of cut and fill, adequate
contours and/or spot elevations of the existing ground as surveyed by a
licensed surveyor or civil engineer. All contours shall extend to minimum of 15
feet beyond property lines to indicate existing drainage pattern. Apply and
obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to grading permit
Issuance.
61. The applicant shall provide soils, geology and seismic report, as part of this
report address the requirement of the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning
Act. The applicant shall provide final soils report showing compliance with
recommendations.
62. The applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan.
The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the
AOfNDA ITEM NO.~.-.2::..-_
PAGE ;;)... -, OF ~ d _
goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage
Area Management Plan.
63.All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and
he/she shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion
control.
DRAINAGE
64.All on-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent
property owners by a notarized letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a
drainage easement.
65.All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site or
shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer.
66.All roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street
curb. All roofs shall drain to a landscaped area. All driveways shall be sloped to
drain into landscaping prior to entering street facilities
67. The applicant shall submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and
approval by City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The developer
shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development
of the site and/or diversion of drainage.
FEES
68. The applicant shall pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC
16.34). The current traffic mitigation fee is $1,369.00 per unit; the current per
unit drainage fee is $702.00 (West Elsinore Drainage Dist.) and the current per
unit TUMF amount is $9,693.00; the amount of fees shall be adjusted according
to the fee schedule current at the time of payment.
69.The applicant shall provide in-lieu payment for future off-site public
improvements prior to building permit. (Res. 86-35) In-lieu payments shall be
calculated by developers' engineer or architect and submitted for city engineers
approval. The estimate shall be based on current cost of street improvements
from property line to centerline of the street within the property limits, plus a
15% added cost for engineering and construction administration.
t,G i;' NO.;;;>-
P/:lGS c'}- <i3 ..Of (00
STORMW ATER/ CLEANW ATER PROTECTION PROGRAM
70. The City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management
and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local
storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system
or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing
oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm
water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures
are available at City Hall.
PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain
system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or
waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
71. The developer is to pay park fees of $1,600 per unit (2 units at $1,600 each =
$3,200).
72. The developer is to comply with all NPDES storm water requirements.
73.The developer is to comply with all City Ordinances regarding construction
debris removal and recycling as per Section 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code.
74.The developer is to meet City curb, gutter, and sidewalk requirements.
75. The City's Landscape Architect is to review all landscape and/or irrigation
requirements.
ELSINORE WATER DISTRICT
76.Water is available; the applicant shall request a 'will serve' letter.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
77. The project is located within the limits of the District's West Elsinore Area
Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted. All applicable fees
4GfN",J'l 1"l"i-1\"1 ~'!O ")
__.1 i ~ "_51i ,\11. .~ c:;:;I-
Pt,-CE~ Of, _OF _ Co d
''''''
should be paid by cashier's check or money order only to the Flood Control
District or City prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All fees to be paid,
should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit.
~ A"'-li~~"\"1. '!'t~.O d
"'h.d;; i'~ u d~V\l i'..~ . _,
P.'\'~,: '1 c> 0" F (a0
..,,~.,.J.i..........~~ ~ ._ _ ._""~
CITY OF ~
LAKE ,6,LSiN()RE
~ DREAM EjTREMEtw
Notice of Exemption
Filed With: 0
Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
Sacramento, CA 95814
[8]
County Oerk of Riverside County
2724 Gateway Drive
Riverside, CA 92507
Project Title:
Minor Design Review of two (2) single-family dwelling units located at 16782 and 16784 Lash Avenue (APNS: 378-263-
023/024).
Project Location (Specific): The proposed project is generally located 450-linear feet southeast of the Morberg Street and Lash Avenue
intersection at 16782 and 16784 Lash Avenue (APN'S: 378-263-023/024).
Project Location (Cit}J: City of Lake Elsinore
Project Location (Count}J: Riverside County
Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project:
A Minor Design Review for two (2) three-story single-family dwelling units with attached two (2) car garages. The proposed single-
family dwelling units located at 16782 and 16784 Lash A venue will have a net lot coverage of approximately forty-two percent (42%)
respectively. Furthermore, the proposed dwelling units are located within the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District and
have a General Plan designation of Future Specific Plan J (Country Club Heights #1).
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Lake Elsinore
Name of Person / Agency Administrating Project: Justin o.rlson, Associate Planner, City of Lake Elsinore
Exempt Status:
o Ministerial (Section 15073)
o Declared Emergency (Section 15071 (a))
o Emergency Project (Section 15071 (b) and (c))
181 o.tegorical Exemption (state type and section number):
Article 19 o.tegorical Exemptions
Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects
Reasons why project is exempt:
This project meets the requirements pursuant to Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the Qilifornia Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA).
Contact Person: Justin Carlson, Associate Planner
Telephone Number: (951) 674-3124 x 295
Signed:
Rolfe M Preisendanz
Title: Director of Community Development
ACnD;\ NO. :;)
P/"Gr:. 3 I OF Co 0 _
Board of Directors
Phil Williams, President
W. Ben Wicke, Vice President
Harvey R. Ryan, Treasurer
Christine Hyland, Director
Kris Anderson, Director
General Manager
Ronald E. Young
Board Secretary
Terese Quintanar
Legal Counsel
Best Best & Krieger
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
February 7,2007
FAX: 955-4886
Mr. Daniel Wagner
Riverside County Fire Department
4080 Lemon Street, 2nd Floor
Riverside, CA 92501
To Whom It May Concern:
Subject: Parcels 378-263-023 to 027, Lash Avenue, Lake Elsinore, CA
This is to confirm that there are two approved residential fire hydrants located on
Lash Avenue.
The hydrants are a 6" with a 2-1/2" and a 4" outlet. The water line in Lash
Avenue is a 24" line. This is a typical hydrant for the area. Minimum fire flow can
be met at 500 gpm. The hydrant is located up to approximately 365 feet from the
driveways.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at extension 8427.
Sincerely,
~Q~
Cher Quinones
Engineering Coordinator
951.674.3146
Fax 951.674.9872
www.evmwd.com
Our Mission... ACFNDA ITEM NO. _)--
EVMWD will provide reliable, cost-effective, high quality water and wastewater seiYif&! 3d- OF. (ao
that are dedicated to the people we serve. . ~. oW - ...
31315 Chaney Street
P.O. Box 3000
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
~
o
o
CJ)
N
CO
,...
("')
~
0..
0\
. @! ~
%~~ ij! ~
T ~ f~
;: I 1 ~
<::
'"
0..
~
Vl
:)
l!l-
Cl
QJ
"0
'ii!
~
ii1
'5
l;
<::
8
1:
Organized Under the Laws of the State of California
ELSINORE WATER DISTRICT
16899 LAKESHORE DRIVE
P. O. BOX 1019
LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92531.1019
(951) 674.2168
DATE: 4-09-07
APN# 378-263-023 to 027
ADDRESS
Lash Street
To Whom It May Concern:
Please accept this letter as official notification that the Elsinore Water District has
sufficient water to service the above referenced address or parcel, and with the
future installation of a standard type hydrant, will be providing fire flow protection
to that area. Mr. Yock Tan has agreed to purchase an approved standard fire
hydrant (6"X 4" X 2 %") that, after installation, will be located approximately 200'
from the above referenced parcel. Minimum fire flow shall be 500 GPM for a 2..
hour duration at a 20-PSI residual. Also, please find a copy of the APN page
showing the location of the proposed fire hydrant.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, or require further
information, please contact us at your earliest convenience.
. Sincerely,
TER DISTRICT
~
Michael Mosier
Field Supervisor
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE ,~~ OF
W' ~ WATER 3 ENGINEER,lr\lG, IN,C.
~ WAT~R " WASTEWATER · RECYCLED WATER~
FAX -rRANSMITTAL
Elsinore Water District
Eric Howard ~
To:
Michael Mosier
From:
Of:
Job #::
Fax No:
088-03
Falt Ho:
Date;
Q.4..09- 07
At:
Water 3 Engineering
Total NUmber of Pages
Including ThIs Page:
2
Hard Copy
To follow:
X No
SUbject: Current and Future Pressures at 6-inch main at Lash Ave & Guntlel'SOl1 5t at'ld Lash Ave & Moreberg
CC: Fne
Ye$
Michael,
MESSAGE
The following is a figure showing the location of Nodes J326 and J420. The nodes is located at on 6-
inch main In Lash Ave. Node J326 is located at the Intersection of Lash Ave and Gunnerson St and
node J420 is 100 feet southwest of Morberg sl The pressures predicted by the electronic hydraulic
model of the distribution system at '!he nodes under different conditions are listed below.
Node J326 - Elevation (per model) = 1.320f~t
Node J42Q - Elevation (per model) :::~~":1i:!et
CUfTerrt Concfrtions (without Junkie Reservoir in service)
Node J326 - Annual Average Demand (AAO) Pressure == 125.04 psi
Node J420 - Annual Average Demand (AAD) Pressure =!J11'2S::03 psi
Node J326 - AAD + 5()()gpm Fire Row (FF) @ J326 ;;: 76.97 psi
Node J420 -AAD + $00 9pm Fire Row (FF)@J420 ;:;: 74.37 psi
Future Conditions (with Junkie Res&rvoir in service)
Node J326 - Annual Average Demand (AAD) Pressure :; 125.17 psi
Node J420 - Allnual Average Demand (AAD) Pressure == 125.16 psi
Node J326 w AMJ + 500 gPln Fire Flow (FF)@ J326 :: 77.49 psi
Node J420 - AAD + 500 gpm Rre Row (FF) @ J420 :;;; 74.89 psi
Plea$e give me a call if you would like to discuss or let me know if you need additional information
- Eric
2430 Vineyard Ave, Suite 201 · Escondido . CA 9.2029
60/10 39'\1d
9N3 E C131'\1M
Phone (760) 737.<)195. Fu (760) 737-6199
AI"'i:'.'''''~ P'-t;. ~.~ '10,1" d-
. ut;r'.IVi"~ ~ 't:;) S\ii'.J.
PAGE ~) OF (Q. d
6619LEL09L 81.01 L00Z/6B/p0
r ~o r :efj-ecr 9Z"8L
, I
T\
...- -- ::\'
lI!. ~ ~
~ :s:. -g
~-t.V
--;::}~
~~C:"
\
~ 1
~
, ~
._ Jo" ;:
it '
~
~
..
... ...
" "'.
~ ~ ~
OI~
$:) /"''&''''''
~ t:: ~ 1'6\\
. h (of '81
-~7/~~.-
l,
~
//?f\:,'" .
:g@
~
N~ @'
~~
/5" /#1. ~
II>
~ ~;;
, '~ ~...
II> '@ "'",..- t
":11.' '8 ~ "
~ ;/I:"~'
it @~,@ ~
/" ,,' ....n.r~~ ""'_Ii rtii\
'@@ ...11> ~
... ;.... .... ~ N'"
, 1.:0>.@ ,,'E ~ @
"17't'" ~ 4'.,...., ~ .......~'.,..
@ ~ .... 1/.......~;;...r\h\
;~,&.,....., . w
.. II>
. ~ _ ~@) ~ ~'<l~
~ ~ @
. . ~ "u.-
~ ~ ./})
~ N"@
..
(il ~
.o~~
~;
('>
"
".
~~
...../~/.c:.
...@
..
'\
:e~
~,r;:;:.. ..
~~~
/~IlI.e:J"'"
/JlS'
~~
tll!:b
,-'-
~~,
~~,
1
,0')
" '"
~
,s
~
t)
,'-
'C:::
l:t-
,\~
,~
~
,~
"
....;,
t)' l:,.'
. .
~.
J~ \':"'~ . ~~ ~ 1'1It
:f ~ ~ ' ~ ... -.; ~ ~ ...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "I! ~ l: ~!
l;~~~lt~Hl:l\~ . .
..:: ~.. ... \f ~ !:~
~~~..f\t:;~"~J:
JJ . q ~ .
"
~
0~
......~....!J.
I(;;\w
I.:::.J~
n'.c; "'~.
G~
.......4'.7J1.
e~
JI...?,.......
@"~
I."''''' ~". .:,,1
~ tA
\.;1 'I
;;.
@
e
..
IQ
, 01
//~ ,.
..
..
AH.i~ -
\.:::;J Q) \
IQ .
~ ~.
@" ~ '~
@ ~ ~
"''':1'''' ,.
.~ ~ossessv ~'ap :4uammo~ r :~ap~
, . rS~aJl.ru :uO'F4dr~:Jsa,
...
..
1
" b.
t:
~
,'" ~
~<4
~
....~
" "
~,
~'"
to ."
[:J~
~
,..
I "
~
...
Q'
...
~
I
'tJ
\J
~
~
:'iho
CJ)'~
0)C)
~~
'<.>, f'
~ho
r-
ho
,C)
~
b.:
--'" @'"
....;;r'~-:- - --
} '~@ @.
.: "'~-.:""~' tr.I ~
~ !<!(l\)\fNIQ'
A6' '"' \QY ~ I
,;"...,91'1:1 ' , .
. ' -:- @~
, "1
~@::1J
. I\) h
'4 .
~ .~~,
. 1 I
CI~
&\0
\),j
-~
'f'1
~
~~
~4/B9/2007 10:13
IofQNN $7:'
..
7607376199
W~r'" .-.
j
.
WA TER 3 ENG
PAGE 02/02
~
...
:::
" ~ ~
,It'
~
~ ~ Ii
.'
...
,~
.
...
~i{ ~
.... --.
:~;-,
I ,
, .' "lit' ~ ,~ ',," ~
" ;.;... .. tll l....
_ ..,,,....CIr
..
~ .... .,~. .. t ~ ~ lJ
· ..~ t ~ l t 'i il
i 't,:" . .
. .57: , '., ,J.)iI..........~,. ~
'. · t ..; ~';'s 'X " ~ '
. ~,~ '2tt E Z,tI ~ ~'7 t ~ II \\ , 1l t.
" , !i:'!pI<~
--!'-::r.; 'l";o." :;;;'~ 4!'.... 't'. ~ ll:l ~ l;; t:
.,.,........ Jtf I I ~ 1.<"
'\ t! ~ ~ '~,~ ~ ~ i~ it ~t l'
'li>lr~.~~l"'~'!Itte -..
". .,.
...
'.
(
~
"
10..
~--o
c- ^ G
~~
~*-~
~ ~O
i_
~
-...
t'
-\"-"."
t~
.., -".
Uf/>
_0'
,"
.1!lJ, .
...,.,.
.., ..
l~
: .",j
ri ;;;
(~:,." .......
Iif~' Ii Wi
hJ ~ "'-.. :, ,;)/'
Ii;. ..".
,~. ..... ~.., ... ..-
f ...-"!~., . - "'t .Uo
ll~ _:~~"
.~
. ..., -.. '"t .JU
~..~~ I
. ~I."
. .. .1/f.M ~lf. 3t.s :
!... .J, :tr.,
t' [._. t~
.It,: . 31. · ,
'''''-.....",.,. . "f .JU
a ~.e._.. ~ _.' .
. . -:. ".1' oj.
.:s- ....... r,. ....1.
..~~~: ;t ". :..
: '!:'~,~.!:.. ..j4~; ..~ ._ ._ .
. ~,,,. ~~- li..~'
:' ,3.1" tr;a:
. - - ..~
NO, ;)-
3>7 _OF CoD
... ." .""
to!
:'i
t ~
- ~
~ ~;.I
:.' ..~ ~ ~~~'"
__. ~'M '~.
. .., '.~
__ n.ff ..
~ . ;;:~ ~~~
M.~.... *1
. ...
..... ",,;IiI
t lU
......- ~.",..
.1 HIJ
.. "'ll:... ~ f\oItp'tftf
~ nil....
- , ..,.,...
~. .e.e4
... ...'"'!I-..... .
Z;;,$
<4'~
t. irt.
_ _ "'J"'~R
't r4"
I ~
,. . \.. ..... .
ACfNDJ\
PAGE
CITY OF ~
LAKE 6LSiNOR[:
\ I
Y DREAM EXTREME
ACKNOWLEDEGEMENT OF
DRAFT CONDITIONS
RE: Minor Design Review of two (2) three-story single-family dwelling units
located at 16782 and 16784 Lash Avenue (APN'S: 378-263-023/024)
I hereby state that I/We acknowledge the draft Conditions of Approval for the above
named project. I/We understand that these are draft conditions only and do hereby agree
to accept and abide by all final conditions prescribed by the City of Lake
as set forth in the attachments to the approval letter that will be
approval.
Date: Irllm
prior to the
onditions, subject to the
City of Lake Elsinore.
All final conditions shall be met prior to issuanc
Certificate of Occupancy, or otherwise indicat
approval of the Community Development Dire
fJSiJ
Phone Number:
J2~ 'i/l-f-
7112- rPJRw/M(
~f!~<Y ,
12--wi#tj I CJ~/jJN j
JIVV/)"'85J'O'rv ~ ~
951.674.3124
130 S. MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530
WWW.LAKE-ELS[NORE.ORG
4GHJDA iTEM r~o.
PACE ,,:? ~
d-
OF (00 ~
~IUI ~
~bb.~
2~~1 ~
~! ~ ~
@~ I III
I
i
!l
nIl!
~nn
;; "
"'"
i!I
'r--
!
'(1)
'iii
;J!
@~
~
:J:
~
ffiil
tdJ
~ J; J:: j; II ~ ~ ~
lelEliJHI
8 ~ ~ ..~ .~ i ~ ~
f!l ;I g I Z
2 i~~ ~
II ~.I
gl!~
Idf
!i~ r
Sf"
..&._. SITE PLAN
::--..;...~+::; 378 263 024
:.":'~_ ""... ';0;::. SPAltIS~ STYlE .
Ii ~UUi i~~UIU!~1
t;P-ft ni;ln~~i
U I! U U ~liB~lii .
~~ ~~.. '1"~~~""~"
U
I
I
I
I'} ~s
~I. ~I 0"
'II
I
I
I !
~ - ! --
-------- T
"
i! It?hhi
h i~ ;1 I h~'
I~ ~i h la! I~
ri 1'1> j~ ~ ~il
I ~ II i Ii
I i I ~
~ i
i~~.. .~.~.!1~ ~ ~ 3~ t;' 3'
~n I; ~~ i i ~j I ~i ~
..I~ ; ~ i 1 ~ i ~ ..~ fn
!i :l ~ 0 ~ ~ ! Mi
~; iJ i ~ ! ~ 6
~e I @. I ~ ~
"'r
r~
ITICJ
GI(I>
~()
OJ>
;g
Z
()
-I
m
(J>
GARY GOH,G.",-"",~ \.i~.
16782 lASH AYE...
LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530
(714) 474'-8663.
I ~ ~
lu'
~.AC.ENDA ITEM NO. "g-
PACE :3 '1 OF (0 0
I~
f~?
.~~~
I~~
I ~
m
. Jh
~ !tf
IJ Ii! I
~ 1 }f
I ~!
f
i !1
~ ~
!l
'"
l:l
.. ~
i
~' ~
l III
UK
;h-
~ ~ .1
Ililll
'0 ,
"
p
ll~'
~JI(.,1
a ! ~
nHI'1
~'1~=;~
~~~!!BB
ii~!p
I !.r!
.. ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
! I
i
""
i;!UUU;~~UIU~ I ~ ~ lun;Hnu;uu I i ~
~I' ;bl~ua~!UI~ i : nuu~~ ll- ~~dN; ~ ~
I i ~ t I ! IWi ~ ~ II : II
j : ! ~ I II I! } I
I i~ iI ~I,
~ i ~ ~
, ~ ~
~ ~
~ I, '- ~
1 ~m
fjunil~~i~~aUU~~i~~HIt!ll1ill!k!!! m ~ ~
~! ~ ~ 111111111i1111~~~
p
I t~i ~u ~IU,,~
111111 ~Illlll ~
" I;/~!! I;/j!!!
5i! ~ ~I ~ ~I ~
~ '. <::t~ . ~~
~ tq ~~ ~~
" "
" "
..
"
I
~~~~ I u~n~ i l!l!~\; ~
h~: i~ "~ ~ " li ~ Sl I ~ ~ ~ ~
.,,1' '" ~ '" '" ~.. B Q; >I" !'-l
d~~ ' fU ~ i; H ~ ~ 9
~~!i I i:;h~ I!; ~
Ii ~Ui; Ii;
~ ";,, Il! I !l ~
~II ~ ~
'~i
111,1 1m !
~lilll:1
II~ ~~d
,~~~ ~~~a
III~ ~5~~
~~~~ ~i~~
~. ,. , 8~
,~I~ ilh~
.~~~ ' ~
;~alll~1
~I!I' ~~b
i~1 dl~
~I. ~~~I
nl ~I~~
ml~ ~~~a
~ i ~~
~; I~ I
~ '"
n~:;~ I
lU::
Q ,
if
i'
~:!II ~
~ II; ~
~ ~ ~~
F ~ ~
~ ! I~
~ i ~ ~c
· ~,g i ~ ~~
Ii ~ = ~ h
:it
Coo
Id
> -0
I ~-i J.>>
; ~~ ?~
. ~~ ~r
~ 0 '::i
i 0a ~~
I
~H
~ !~:
"1 ih
~ ~H I
~ 1;1
~ ~f
I y~
11
l III
~ ~ 1 ·
~ .
r
a
n
UN
'1 "1'1
!Ii .1
llr
t.
~
i
L_
1
~
14.
-~~-
"
filIll,
~ '1 ~.. . ~
~l\..B ~
5 i ~H i
i H @
~ ~ ~ ~
~h
~~: I;' I
I "/
~ ~
ftJcJ
L~
s ~~ g~
. ~; ~~
~~~~~
; ~ g
I
m
E Hi
F IH
· ~ ih
! 11111
I 2i
If
s
.
~1 I
; .~: i
Iil .
"
~ .
i
~! a
III
aJ R
"I 01'1
~ .1
" 'III
· . J
, r
.,,0
;0-
~ ~~~
~!; 0
ah~~
~I~>~
":S;_
~:z~!a
~c z
"'.,,0
~~
~. .
~~ ~c.lc.
\l! FRONT Qf GARAGE lI'<E
, !
I>,)
~ \
~ ,
I \
I' lI'<EOF1STfLR
I
~ ~ ~ .
1
!
lINE
I
L
LM OF 1ST R.R
I
,
,
,
. ,
,
~
,
~~. ~~~~,
PACE LJ cr OF C;, ()
I
)>J
.....
"'...
r-<"
~
r<<--
~:J I
.ISe :
I!.~ !
~ II~I I
~ 8!;1~ r1
~ :
, 1
e~ I
~q 1
___L_j
---,
1
,
,
iil
_,
, :
i i I
~ II
,
,
,
,
L___-,
I
I
,
I
1
,
,
,
,
,
I
I
I
,
1
I
1
,
,
I
I
I
,
________J
~ .!\
~
,
I
i
t
II
~i
m~
~~
~
m
-0
?i
~
~
}
~
~
3"-4"
,-<
"'...
I~'
m:!
;11
! ~
!~I
~!
>t-< e
UI'''''"
,'",
N
,
,
o
t8I
~
~ ;
t8I
~
~
~:!!
:J:I
"en
-t
g
::D
-0
~
S
Iii
,-
1M
~
il
I
I
"j
~
"
~
H
"'...
&~~ FLOOR PlANS
:::::';...;.."":'"'"+= SPANISH STYLE
,.",..,""' O:''G!Ia'
M....'".IJG 'r,u,~,." e#e..
PACE
,
I
,
1
I
,
Iii
,.
~
~
II
I
,
I
,
"
~
~~!SI
:1 ~ i
;i1 ~ ~
I~ i I
J -
!alii "l.
il ".
E~~
OF
lo-0
'"
&.=-
-... ~ + IIlWIM.
..........ar; JUlIE JIM
. __.. OU2llIJ..
"" - - _em IWumt._1Ii.78
$ECOND FLOOR PlAN
SPANISH SlYLE
~~ISI
:n i
:I ~ ~
Ii I I
~~ 'i
~I 'I
GARY GOH
16782 LASH AVE.
LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530
(714) 474-8663
.AGEI\!D.4 11"1:2.1 NO.
PAGE l/ \..f _OF
00
~jI:I
;;>-
<00
JI'-1~
a'-"1~
11'-1"
Nt' ~
...... ~
tM:., I. II~ ~I .
I L, . n...-L -"
I -5r
: 'mIT
' II
I II
m $~. I'. ~,Tm~~
ii '! 0\. I 1 ..<~ 1 ...... <1;\
~ ! IG I \. ! I I ' t
~ ! !. f---Jt+Iltl . ....~
en \ I'.: '~., I .... ' . '.~ /1
~S! . I .'. ,'Iy.
1 ~ \ '!. r .'
i I I.
:. r IJ
:! I ~
I
I
I
I
I
:
.-t'
I
&'-1.
"'...,.
J1'-1~
1I'-1~
......
l.I--....l
~ · <;>T~
o~o' . T~,! 0
ig: O!~... .'1 : 'I'.~f .
~ 0 . . . ,/'.' ! ~
~ 00.......... <t ~/
Ol~. .'~.' /
JL.......~ ~ . IJ ~
:"lIl'~ .' I=g
.' 0- . .'. ".u =sf' "l .' ~;:1 ..
. . r' -:0. ..~'ll'~ :Q:
/ i ~iI~';~-f '. ~ 4>
~ '(~ ~
~ ;~ Il:
I I h-. ;~ i
I ~-(f 1lI~
~~T ~q ~ij ~," I"; ~00000~0<2>00$<S>$$
r! h h II;; I n; e; i ; i i ; ! I I ~ I ;; ~
~. t ;!~ 0 i ~ :1 ;1 ! ! I; : I ~ ~
~ I ~ I ~ ;~ !! I ~ I ~ ~
i~ II ~
'I~ ..---
..)>J ~,ELEVATION {SPANISH STYLE)
U oj _. ...:.... ""'":':-. '
ijl. JDJI__cr.__
I ~l g. ~.. CD FM !I!It.'::.=
.,"
11'-1-
e~
}~
Ji~
:>
-P--
~~
~
m
Iii
~
a
:z
e en
~
sa;
p:
8> ..
0- ,
--
~:z
'0
:!:l
:r
m
r-
~
::!
o
:z
~ ti i!i iil[j/~ /
~ is is 8 is ~ i /~
I r~,'",,,';~i--":/~~ -iJ Iii
L~ I
1 /
J /
i {,..Ir'?"
~,!'.1
. ..' '.' ~~
11V! .... I. \~
@)- -~j /+-~
mmmm ...~
. J>:/l '. '. ..... !1?-
/ ...... /Jsr
. . ~~
. .j ~. P:;!;
.' . '~I::J
lEB3331 .--L.--L ~
Z
I
r
I
:
ft.' .
J .
I
','
!)
.!sll .
,....:
I
1'"7"
~ .~!
b!! /~~ M ~: y_,"
II=Jl / ,,'_,'
~/ --
~/ "'..,
U!i mil
! ~i~ I~I~
r~~~ x ~ ~, ,; jl
"'lS . ~ "\ /IS it ~
~B ; .l~ ~ il~
8Y. Ii! l/J~ I IIlI .S1~
. ~.. ~~
..Ill _..
III .lll:::t
. .~
, .'
. .~
.
.....
I
IT
(')
: W
(11.,.1,1 ~ ~
I 5i
: ~
i Q?
! ,~:l~r ~~
I. L.,L..,.
,:.. '., ." ". ~
:."F='. ~~
!'~~~ .
I ,
!, .:. '7f .' ~ ~
J '. _
: : .' ~ IIf5. '<Y
~ II H 01~
..
:....:8.
~.;,
"'tl
n:: @}- '. '.
7- - I,'
~C1>:r g- j--. .
, . '" , .
. <v> .0..
I
~ y ~
"
I
"'.....
GARY GOH
. '1 6782 . LASH AVE,
ELSINORE, CA 92530
(714) 474 8p63
liB
~ffJDJ.\ nE',,; i\l2=--_
PAGE ~ OF
J-
~
&.::-
...... + aII&I:W. + IfIllSIlWl.
3q1Z INlDIillD cr. stltE204.
~'...._ Cfoll25SJ
................, fAXllOt _,851.&
~e:
0.
-n
."
s;;:
Z
II
II~>
I'
~
:::I
--I k
-~~
1~1i===-=-
tJ ~
~
~
1- _==~1~
~ ~~
~ -
m
~
."
,"
~
~
~
o
~
~1SI
~ i
I I
I I
~
~
ROOF PlAN
GARY GOH'
16782 lASH AVE.
LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530
(714) 474.. 86:B3"
SPANISH STYLE
,''-:..''
AGfNDP\ ITEM r~o,_~
PACE 4 ~ OF
0- 01
~~ .
'Ii
=.., .
~I ~
. .
:. ~
~I !
. i
~
)-
~()
,&~''': ...... SECTION PlAN
=-.-...~+~ SPANISH STYLE
1IlllIIEJl:.' ~i:2sI3.
N.~.f"aa px .,'..~
/ I
)>
~ffl
Q
5
z
m
~
'-l
5
z
~
~
~/ ;;; ti g1 w
0 ~ ~ '"
g '" g '" is
<>
0000000001
J I I J !: : ~ I I~
: ;:~il.l!'J
· 1"'1 'I~
~ d
.~
~
Ii
GARY GOH
1 6782 LASH AVE.
lAKE . ELSINORE, CA 92530
(714) 474-8663
ACfNDf.i ii:.'lI1
PAGE~OF
u
B
(cJ2;
I~ e. i ~i
r-t
~2~
~Hl .
i~ i I'
+ W8"~d~
I ~
.~~
~ ~~ d*e
~~
... ~15i
~ ~ ~
~ 11
~ .. m
f! ;J! g
F ~ g
~ 0( ~
"
ffi m
0 E I-
~ .
liI
F
~
i~~ ~.
~n &
.~;:
r!!!~
~~
Ii W<LmasH ~
(J> ~
~~ ~ 1 "'1l
~~ Iii!; Jilli!~ II !I
.~ ~. I Ii
~ -~
~
2
~
-t
~
il ~16
~~ a;il
II ; ~~.
e' I ~i
Ii!. I
I 0
~ m
~ ~; ~
I~ ~
~~ ~ ~
~F F
r- g
m
Iii x
~ m
r- .
-t m
.. 2 ~
... ;$-0-
2 I
&....- FlNISH DETAILS
. .-
~.ii,;.~+= SPANISH SlYLE-
~__ _ . _ l"A..,
1'iL....I!II.~,IWC9lfl,.,~
MR. GARY- .GOH
Ii
16782 lASH AVE. ~
. LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530
AerND;\ nEM NO. ;;)..
PACE y~ _OF - Coo .
MQERIAL AND COLOR aJARD
FOR
LA5l-I AYE.
AFN: 318-263-(/)24
TWO STORY BUILDING
WI ATTACHED 2 CAR GARAGE
"SPANISH STYLE"
MR. GARY GOI-I
CAPISTRANO STYLE
EAGLEL ITE
NAME: vALENCIA
No. !;26
ROOF FINIS~
COLOR: X-!;0 CRYSTAL WI-IITE
(BASE-100) BY "LA I-IABRA"
STUCCO WALL FINIS~
COLOR: I-IONEYSUCKLE CORAL COLOR: X-48 MEADOWBROOK
1814D BY: "FRAZEE" (BASE-100) BY "LA I-IABRA"
FASCIA BD. STUCCO TRIM
'IMOJAVE"
COUNTRY LEDGESTONE
CSV-20042
BY: CULTURED STONE
STONE vENEER
ACENDA rn:M NO. ....)-. ~-'"
PAGE_ Y <1 _OF Co 0--",
"~'-,
:~~i~ ~
~~ii~1 '=
!;~b i
2~~~ ~
o~ ~ ill
go l'l -{
@~ ~ m
I
o
~
~
~
~un
H~~$
~I~ii
;~
C!.::i!!
EI
'(1)
~ ~iii ~
~ 1I:I:
~ r ~
~.
I
I
------r---
/1
till
.S!
1~
l__
If i
~! ~
i 3
i
~
ffjil I'
l!!J
H ~ ~ II Ii ~~~!. ~UU~1
~~ ~~- fi U~ IH~ll
HfSS iU-;sIf~.~~U
~~.'II'11 .'II~!C'II'II'IIr.'II'II
H
fJ 0~\"~.-
ii ~f u IIU~
~~ i; h du!
..~ i~ ji Il~.ll
~ i il j~ ~ ~ I~
i l II,d
~ ~ ~ i lil~
I ~ I ~
- ~ i Q
t;H:IH~~~
j l! ~ ~ 6.1- . m
!iQ!jg~~m
~ft~~if ;
~ I~L ~
I~S i t ~i ~ ; !. ~ ~!: (p
~I\ ~; g~ ~., 1\ i ljl iit
~~ , ~~ ~,2 ~ B; ~ r
~~ ~ ~ ~ i" m m
!!' 0 ~ 0 (;\
~.~ i ~ i ~ ! .~ ij
~~ ~ ~. 'l 0
~ ~ 'l
! jlll
( RI
~~
s
&._'
JI!SIlBmfL+ ClllIIIEIll:W.+1IIlUSnllM.
31m NOlIIlOJfCf. am: ICI4
-- .......
1IlL1If_1WS f'AllllSf_M7e
"r
rJ:>
mZ
Ii'U
m<l>
ZO
UJ:>
11
m
Z
o
-l
m
<l>
GARY GOH p
ili;
16784 lASH AVE. ~ !
LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530
(714) 474~8663
ACENDA \:':;'" N .'
PACEY.OF (.o()-=-
SITE PLAN
378 263 023
MONTEREY STYLE
I ~6J1
~~~
! ~~ i';j
. p~~
"H
E ih
C~ Hi
j ii!!
~ [d
I ~.
,~
1t
~
Ii
H~
~ i I !;
~ III!
ii, )
~ ~
.
P m
c;;gQ
~ "'l:!~
R'l;o
~ a~ ~ ~ ..,
~ I~...-<
~ l!il >~ i:'i
gl"~~f!!
~ Z (J)
,..C')z
~"lJ~
~~f'1
'"
~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~~~~!:l~ ;; "~.~;;~.~~ ~~~ - ~ 'rg"e"~~-
=~ ~> ~rjpN> ~ *~~>~~~i~ ~>a3~~~UI;'i;; ~;~~d~'IF
~ ~~; ~ ~~~~~.'i ~~ Ig~~~~~.!~a ~~~d~~S~~
i ! : I M@;iiI it ~iiii:m ~~~J~I~~ :!h!;i!;i ~
~ ~ l!~a. ~m ~~ ~ · ~g>~' ~F~ t- _> 'I~~.~_ ~_ fTl
~ F ~ ~ ~j i N~~ a~ i~F ~ ~ ;~l!'~ ;_.~ ~ ~ Fe~ ~
d_ I ~ F~- ~~~~~ ~a ~~. S ~~~5 Inm ~ ~!~ r
~~~ l 5 g ~ ~;;~ ;~!~;~I Iii ! : N~I ~i:i ili:! ~2~ 6
Ii~ ! I ~ ~h ~ ~~~: ~~I~h.l~ i~~ ~ i i~~~~ ii~~ i~~n ;~~ -j
~~ F F ~ .>1 ~eFl! a ~ ,e gB~ ~ ~ > 5~ ;;F23 ~i U ~~ ~
:n u;n ; ii u;d !2;n ~L ~! ;il n ; lihu; ~q~~ d:d h
~~ ~ g ~~~ ~ ~ ~ 8~ . a ~ i~i ~ hF. ~ i~ ~ I~ ~ia m i ~ ij~. a" - il ~~~ 8 liF I g~
Ii n I!I ~ s:1 ~:n; ~~ ii :Iii Ull! h; i~' Ii q ~ ;!H~ hll~;1 n ~ b Ii
In ~ ij~ i!1 n a _, ~ .~U2~ ; II ;~ ~ i g~ a ~I ~ ~ Ii .~ ~ ! ~ ~i~ ~e ~ g ~ e~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~
~il ~ ~ e ~ I ~ il 5 ~i .ail ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ a~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ >
.. e ~ ~ ~ R ~~ m ~" e m ~ ~. x~ . ~ ~
iSIHml;::HIU~ I ~ ~ Ilm;I~I~UIUIII ~ ~
~1';~;;h~U'5~lrl ~ ; Ihm~s ~11~~i!I~~ i II
I ~ = E i! ! n a -I ~ I~ 8! =
I : ! ~ 1~li I: H
I ~~ ~ !'
! ~ i
i ,
j I ,~.
~ U~
/jnm~.iw~HR~~~@qnt~t lillI, i,ll, jli~i!! m ~ ~
rfl! "1h I II" I ~ ~ ~
mmi
~~~Hi
"i~~~~
iCi~!~
~ ~ r ~
~ ~ C :
~ ~ ~ a
~ i~
I ~
~ ~
.
~
"
II ~I
~ t
~ ~
~ 'lI
~
EI~
~u ~~u ~ i~1
r;:r;:r;: ~r;:r;:r;: ~ ~d
.~~~ ~~~ ~~~
~ "' ~ I . ~~.
· ~~ · Q~ i~~
!!l" !!l" .ai
Q '( (:)""( l'5i1
~ ~ 8~
I~i
i~m
I~~
~d
~~~
.0
... ...
~~~~ ~ nH~~ ~
~ >-!!ir;: &l 'l ~ >-' ~ If ~ 0
~ i'i~" ~ ,,' ~ lS: ~ ...
~~I~~ ~ :.~ ~~~ f
ll~!i .I.~~~~~
~~~~ j:hr-
a~ r;:~ ~r;:~
~"l "'~ Ii~jl!
~ a~ ~ ~
'I "l j:l '"
~
~
.-"lo.
I!~II!II !
~;n II:;
I':i ~ilil . ~
~~.= ~ ~a "!'
~ ;~ .:~~ I~ft
;~~~ ~~.~ ~~~
~~r;:~ ~.~h ~ ~~~
~~,. '~~ i I~'
, I~ ~~m. .
!Iii II-l · '!I!!!!
~'I iil! III
1111 ;I;~ UI
~I~~ hI) ~
~~ ~ ~ ~
~
....
'"
c:>
'"
Z
t:I
'" ~~ B ~
~ ~ ~ ~ f!:;
~~~~ ~
a" ~ 1\0 El
Hg~ l!1
'lil~ r;: ::i
h~ ~
~q
~i ~
r;: ~ ~
~
j:l
~ :..~ 0
~ I ~ ~I
!'!i l'!I3
~
nr:~ ~
hii~
!ill!. "'Ill
"l!!"'~ ii
!I
I
/
~Q
~"l
~<;]
"C''''' i '0. . ~ ..-
..'J):-'N. ~
PAGE~"--l _OF
II~
> -"
~ ~- '.
B~S
, 'i !~ r~
r (5~ ~f:J
' ~ 8
i
ii'H
, .h
P '-a
~ ;i!
~ 1 Ii! I
~ 1;-!
~ ~J
I S~
11
OJ
I
~
14,
-~-
<j,
v..
!.~
hn~
I, ~~ ~~
~o ,!,ll
a 8~
I
~
dl I
.
p
ClRlLINE
\\
\
\
PROPERlY LIE
\ '
\
\
\
\
\. ~ FROOT OF GARAGE LIE
\ !
\
f~
\
I
~~~~~~~
lIE OF 1ST FlR
UNE
~
CURBLl<E
~
\
\
PROPERTY LINE
\
\
~
\
\
\
~
L
\
\
:\ T
~y
~ \
\
\
\
OF
UNE
LlNE0F1STflR
\
\
\
. \
\
\
, '0 ~
\ i I
\U
I
~i~~~~~
"/"'7'~ "3
OF
\
1 :
e i!
OF (0 C)
I
)>'
.....
&.::-
...... + CCIII8:ML+........
S57':1lIIDtfliIDfC'l'. Ul'llM
-- ".....
....___ N851l11lS....,.
!.
IiI
!~!
~'I
!i~
~'___ rU
H
~
~~
~
m
...
s;:
:z ~
,
~ ~ I
i
,
~
~
I\)
~:!!
:D
~
~
:D
...
~
!
}
~
I
~
FLOOR, Pl-ANS
,....
~
Ili~
r
II
it
~
fTI
I.~:~~
iii!
r!:i
jjl!i
!J~
-------1
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
J
,
r---..J
,
,
,
,
,
;;;,
"
-,
.,
~:
~ :
,
,
,
,
J
;1
u
U
"I
II
~<
-$
----Ij
I
~
"
:~
~ ~.
!I
,
,
,
~ ,
" I
r.
~ ,~
- ~
~
~
,
~ ,
~ ,
,
,
"
If-t' 10'-1" ~[gJ IS!
,,-'" M ,'-r Y.r ~i. ~ "
~~ ~ 2
,,-<" 1ll'-1I' ~
~. ~ ~
2-l I I
l\i
~~
~. ~
S~
I
Y-4'
'---"'-"'"-
,,'-4'
GARY GOH
16784 LASH AVE,
LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530
(714) 474-8663
':"CcNDA ITEM NO.
PACE D'Y OF
I, . a
-..
;; 0 ~
B
(n d
:;11 27'-'" 5'-0"
.I~~ 15'-3"
ill; <'-4'
!.~
~
~
~~ g. J
. i
z i~
c ~ ~ i
~
~
:n ,
" ~ ::.c":
s~ .......
t
~ i
~ ~ I [j
~
14'-2"
211'-2" r"'1/1" IS-11/2.
~'-o"
&.. -=-- SECOND FLOOR PLAN
_+<<IoIDCW.+1IIUIllM.
.-n.JrItlMUllllIcr. SlIIE..
-- ..-
PH._I_au 'fM"1_8ll1O
~~ISJ
~~ ~
e~ ~
:.i :
8~ a
,~ -
.~ '
~I ~
GARY GOH
16784 lASH AVE.
LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530
(714) 474-8663
AGENDA ITEM NO.
PAGE S-S/ OF
):~
Co ~9 _~"
1'-1" 1'-1"
~u ~,
~
1
,'4
OJ
'.m" .". ".f
" r.
. .
.. .
, " : .....
. .
. .
, ',.
'. .
~~
~
m
~
'-I
o
Z
.....
.4
:"~
s .
.. ,
"
~
~~
"-I"
31'-r
o
~~
~
m
Fii
:;;
::l
o
z
~~
~~
.!:om
"::JJ
~
.....
.-"
...
r.r
e e e 0
~~ il~ ~i~ IU ~;
l~ q ~g~ ~S~ ~
! I I ~~I ~
I h~
I
)>'
G.l .
f ;
$$000~&$00U0~i
R I ~i i~~ · I ~ ~ ~ I ; S I ; il~ 15
i ~I :11 i I ~ i ~ i: i Rid [;J
i !l! .~~ I R I ..i I ~~
~; ~~~ I I I ~ 6.
:P~I I I I
&.=-- ElEVATION (MONTEREY STYlE)
ROIIINIW.+ COIMJI:IIC. + IIllImUL
31m2 ..... c:t. lUII:...
-- ..-
......t__ 1'N(t61_.,.
>
~g;!
~
m
.-
m
:;;
'-I
o
Z
;~
(:IJ
-, ~
.....
. . \
.f\ .
~ -\\
.\
----,
. I
I
.,'
)I!; !I!;I
'i'i~ld I"I~
....... tt c;l .. ...
~,.'il( ; .. , ~
e~:;'ii~ ~ !i~
I/) S.III.\:I lot fill:!;'
.all 1~.It.
"lq "x
: :~
.~
..
.
I
I
i~
idl
I
I
il-----L---_T_______..... \
1 r-----------I, \
LJ \ ,
j'-_\_-----~\---~--, ~,
Lr-------------\ I \
I I I \" .?1.
N w <A: \) \ b'
c.n 0 Con, lii \
g is 8 II V \
1- I
"'" I
'" I
19'-10" 8. \
.-1" \,
1'4' \\ \
I
\\
I:~
\
\
I I
o 01
g g
I
g
g
'-<1'
(')
*
8
~~
~
:r:
m
~
'-I
o
Z
~~
}~
~!B
~
II
II
A
.,
II
~
GARY GOH
16784 LASH AVE,
LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530
714) 474 8663 N
~'~VbmAITtM NO.. d
,pAGE~[~~. OF. ~J
t ! ~ ~
I ~ ~ <
n~
I
)>'
~
~~
o
"T1
"tI
~
..
~
<'-<
(gJ~
~ i
; ;
! I
"
&.-::- ROOF PlAN
........ .. CCIMIll:lM. + INIlUSlfIll.
XJ721N11\101lRDMct. UlI:2lI4
-- .."'"
M....__ I'MllIl_""
GARY GOH
16782 & 16784 lASH AVE.
LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530
(714) 474 8663
t",.:,~ NDA ITEM fJO.
PAGE S'7 OF
001
~e ;;
~I I -l
~~"" .
;- ~
". .
iI ~
~i !
I z
)>'
(J1
)>
~m
~
0
Z
m en
Iii m
m
~ "
g
~ z
0
S ~
0
~ Z
11
~ ~
~/ I
'" '" ~ ii1 ~
;:; ~. <> '"
is 8 is is is is
0000000001
: I ~ : ! ~ I I I~ z
· i~~51.1
" "Ii "I"
~ !~
s~
~
6
.. &.~ SECTION PLAN
1lESIIENlW.+ CCIIiIElDIL+ IIOlSIlWt.
a!72I11N1ll111C1'. SUE1IlM
-- ........
_"_1111 mlS1_flml
GARY GOH
16784 LASH AVE.
LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530
(714) 474-8663
la
< <
~~
...0fNDA ITEV1 NO.
PACE S--~ OF
e
(j
!~
t~
~F
I ~
.~~
~g ~~~9
,,~~
~ ,!~:ro;.
,0 ~ili~
~ ~
! ~
m
: .. ~ ;J! g
~ . ~
. ~ I <l
F P s !l
~ i m ~
~ E ..
0 iZ
m .
~ I
F
~
i~1 ~
~~! ~
. ~::
'~~
~lil
....s
~l!! WN..LRNISH ~
ill ~
Q> ~
~ilI
~~
! :
I:
~ I
~J
....
~
&. ..-... FINISH DETAILS
.-
~"":"""+':': MONTEREY STYLE
-.. ..-
......IIIG lWI:811ttl88818
~
!~ 1m I JIII!!~ ~I !I
~i!1 ~ ~ ~ E ji
Q -~
~
i
~
....
2
il
~
ig
~~
....
~
~
F
~
m
iii
~
....
2
3'-0"
~I
!~
~D
Is
~I
j
MR. GARY GOH I ~
LASH AVE ~
lAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530
-----_____-i-___ -- _ _--- _ _ I?AOe <\-q--OF~-O---- _
MriERIAL AND COLOR SdARD
FOR
LASH AVE.
AFN: 318-263-023
TWO STORY eUILDING
WI ATTACHED 2 CAR GARAGE
IIMONTEREY STYLEII
MR. GARY GOH
MALlBU STYLE
NAME: GRAY BROWN RANGE
No. 2681
ROOF FINI5t-l
COLOR: X-12 ADOBE
(BASE-200) BY "LA HABRA"
5TUCCO WALL FINI5t-l
4 TRIM
COLOR: BASQUE BROWN
826!;A.MBY: "FRAZEE"
FA5CIA 6D., WOOD TRIM
BRACKET, 5t-lUTTER5
(WALNUT)
"COUNTRY LEDGESTONE"
BY: CULTURED STONE
5TONE vENEER
AOE~JDA ITEM NO. ;)...
PACE <cd OF 00
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
TO:
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DA TE:
MAY 1, 2007
PREPARED BY:
CAROLE K. DONAHOE, AICP,
PROJECT PLANNER
PROJECT TITLE:
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-03
THE ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION,
COMMUNITY CENTER AND PARK
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
STK ARCHITECTURE, INC., 42095 ZEVO DRIVE,
SUITE A15, TEMECULA, CA 92590-3780
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
PROJECT REQUEST
STK Architects requests approval for the design and layout ofthe Rosetta Canyon Fire
Station, Community Center and Park complex, to be constructed in two (2) phases.
PROJECT LOCATION
The project site is located on the southwest comer of Rosetta Canyon Drive and
Ardenwood Way, within the Ramsgate Specific Plan. It is south of Highway 74 and
east of Interstate 15, and known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 347-120-050 and -053.
BACKGROUND
On May 23,2006, the City Council approved an agreement for professional services
with STK Architecture, Inc. to provide architectural and construction management
services for the Rosetta Canyon Fire Station and design of the Community Center.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
PACE I OF J$
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 1, 2007
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-03 FOR THE ROSETTA
CANYON FIRE STATION, COMMUNITY CENTER & PARK
Various City staff and Fire personnel have worked with STK to design the plans,
which include the park area and future Community Center.
On February 6th and February 13,2007 respectively, the Planning Commission and the
City Council both endorsed the conceptual plans. The Planning Commissioners were
particularly pleased with the architectural designs. Subsequently, STK submitted
formally for Design Review approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Existin Land Use Zonin General Plan
Project site Vacant Ramsgate SP Ramsgate SP
Communi Park
North Vacant Ramsgate SP Med. Ramsgate SP
Hi h Densi
East Centex Residential Ramsgate SP Ramsgate SP
develo ment Medium Densi
South Lennar Residential R-l Single Family Low Medium
develo ment Residential Densi Residential
ANALYSIS
Rosetta Canyon Fire Station
Fire trucks will take access onto Rosetta Canyon Drive. The existing raised landscaped
median will be modified to accommodate this access. Any healthy trees in the median
will be relocated onto the project site. The Fire Station can receive visitors, with
parking available both in the front of the building and the rear.
Phasing
Due to funding constraints, the project has been phased. Phase I includes the 3-bay,
8,657 square foot fire station, two (2) basketball courts, three (3) tennis courts, picnic
areas with tables, a 1,400 square foot restroom building, tot lot, parking lot, and the
AGENDA ITEM 3
p AGE ~ OF .4.J
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 1, 2007
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-03 FOR THE ROSETTA
CANYON FIRE STATION, COMMUNITY CENTER & PARK
installation of irrigation and grass on Parcel C, the future park site. Phase II will
include the Community Center, four baseball fields, concession/rest room facility, the
supplemental parking lot along the west side of the park, and other improvements
(additional picnic areas, walking paths, etc.).
The total cost for Phase I is estimated at $7,415,000. The project will be funded
through a combination of revenue sources including park impact fees, developer
agreement fees, fire facility impact fees, community center impact fees, the General
Fund, CFD proceeds and potential County contributions.
The Community Center
Visitors to the Community Center and the park amenities in Phase I, will approach and
exit from the two driveways on Ardenwood Way. The City Traffic Engineer requested,
and STK provided, right turn in/right turn out limitations for the easternmost driveway,
due to its proximity to the left turn pocket on Ardenwood. An entry monument will be
located at the comer of Ardenwood Way and Rosetta Canyon Drive, and the project is
conditioned to submit the design for the monument as a separate application prior to
building permit.
The Community Center building houses a high school size basketball court plus four
half-courts, with tilt and roll bleachers. Surrounding an interior courtyard with water
feature/fountain and landscaping are two multi-purpose rooms, a dance room, activity
room, a police sub-station, kitchen and offices for sports and recreation.
The Community Park
Concurrent with the Community Center, the four baseball diamonds will be completed,
along with the supplemental parking area along the west boundary ofthe site. The City
Traffic Engineer requested, and STK provided, a four-lane driveway into and out of
the supplemental parking lot, as well as appropriate signage designating the baseball
facilities.
AGENDA ITEM '3
PAGE~OF 4.S
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 1, 2007
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-03 FOR THE ROSETTA
CANYON FIRE STATION, COMMUNITY CENTER & PARK
Park Restrooms
Within the formal design review submittal, STK provided floorplans and elevations for
the Park Restrooms adjacent to the tennis courts. Architectural features match the
outstanding elevations for the fire station and community center, with arched entries
and columns, and tiled roof-top elements.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Staff has determined that the project complies with Addendum No. 3 to the Final
Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 88090525) for
the Ramsgate Specific Plan No. 89-1, and the Mitigation Measures thereto, certified by
the City Council on August 22, 2006.
Commercial Design Review No. 2007-03 does not propose substantial changes to the
Ramsgate Specific Plan, nor would any substantial changes to the Specific Plan result
from its approval. No new significant environmental effects, nor an increase in the
severity of previously identified significant effects are anticipated. Therefore, in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and pursuant to
Section 15162 - Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations, of said act, staff has
determined that Addendum No.3 provides the necessary environmental clearances for
the proposed fire station, community center and park, and that no further
environmental documentation for Commercial Design Review No. 2007-03 is
necessary.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff determined that the project complies with the Ramsgate Specific Plan 89-1 Fifth
Revision, provides visually pleasing architecture and efficient floorplans, and therefore
recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council
of Design Review C2007-03 for the Rosetta Canyon Fire Station, Community Center
and Park, in accordance with Exhibits 'B' through 'H.'
AGENDA ITEM 3
PAGE -d.. OF ..dl
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 1, 2007
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-03 FOR THE ROSETTA
CANYON FIRE STATION, COMMUNITY CENTER & PARK
PREPARED BY:
CAROLE K. DONAHOE, PROJECT PLANNER
/J?/ffL-----
ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
APPROVED BY:
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Exhibit 'A' - Vicinity Map
2. Resolution recommending Approval of Design Review No. C2007-03
a. Conditions of Approval for C 2007-03
b. Exhibit 'B' - Site Plan - Sheet A-I
c. Exhibit 'c' - Fire Station Floor Plan, - Sheet A-2
d. Exhibit 'D' - Fire Station Exterior Elevations - Sheet A-3
e. Exhibit 'E' - Park Restroom Plan and Elevations - Sheet A-4
f. Exhibit 'F' - Community Center Floor Plan - Sheet A-5
g. Exhibit 'G' - Community Center Elevations - Sheet A-6
h. Exhibit 'H' - Conceptual Landscape Plan - Sheet L-I
3. Reduced color exhibits (Enclosures)
4. Acknowledgement of Draft Conditions
AGENDA ITEM 3
PAGE.s OF g
~.--~
VICINITY MAP
ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION, PARK AND
COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT
THIRD ST
I-
(f)
o
e:::
o
u..
0:::
w
~
~
o
-
~
"Y
~
'v~
;>
0~
<<.{?
E:-" '\7'" L~ ~ R ~ '==1"
.r\.~ d C~
'AI
3
OF at!
AGENDA ITEM riO.
PAce ,
~
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-03 FOR THE
ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION, COMMUNITY
CENTER, AND PARK WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 25479
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by
STK Architecture, Inc. requesting Design Review approval to construct a three-
bay, 8,657 square foot fire station, an 18,934 square foot Community Center, and
regional park facilities that include three tennis courts, two basketball courts, tot
lot, picnic areas, four baseball diamonds, walking trail, restrooms, concession
facility, and two parking lots, all within Tract Map No. 25479, located on the
southwest comer of Rosetta Canyon Drive and Ardenwood Way, east of Interstate
15, and south of Highway 79, and known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 347-120-050
and -053; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has
been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City
Council regarding Design Review requests; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal.
Pub. Res. Code gg 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R.
gg 15000 et seq.), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and
paperwork associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously
prepared environmental documents when those previously prepared documents
adequately address the potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA
Guidelines Section 15006); and
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines, Article 11, Section 15162 establishes the
standard to be used when determining whether further environmental
documentation is necessary and says that when an environmental document has
already been adopted for a project, no subsequent environmental documentation is
needed for subsequent entitlements which comprise the whole of the action unless
substantial changes or new information are presented by the project; and
WHEREAS, on August 22, 2006, the City Council reviewed and approved
Addendum No. 3 to the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (State
Clearinghouse No. 88090525) for the Ramsgate Specific Plan No. 89-1; and
AGENDA ITEM fJO.
PACE 7
3
OF .30
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_
PAGE20F4
WHEREAS, the Project does not present substantial changes or new
information regarding the potential environmental impacts of development and it is
found that no further environmental review would be required; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Design Review has been given, and the
Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with
respect to this item on May 1, 2007.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed
design for the Rosetta Canyon Fire Station, Community Center and Park, and has
found them acceptable.
SECTION 2. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the
Commercial Design Review No. 2007-03 does not propose substantial changes to
the Ramsgate Specific Plan and does not present any new information,
circumstances, or changes to the project that was analyzed under Addendum No.3
to the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. The Design Review
application is part of the whole action which was analyzed in Addendum No. 3
when the Ramsgate Specific Plan was amended. The Design Review does not
change density or intensities of use. It simply establishes standards for color
palates, articulation, orientation, and design. Therefore, it is not necessary to
conduct any further environmental review for the Project.
SECTION 3. That in accordance with Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
Section 17.82, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the
approval of Commercial Design Review No. 2007-03:
1. The project as conditioned, will comply with the goals and objectives of the
Ramsgate Specific Plan Fifth Revision, and therefore the City's General
Plan.
The master-planned Ramsgate Specific Plan designates the site for
Community Park. The proposed fire station, community center and park
implements the land use objectives and requirements of the Specific Plan.
AGENDA ITrM NO. 3
PAGE . F...or: ~8
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_
PAGE 3 OF 4
2. The project complies with the design directives of Ramsgate Specific Plan
No. 89-1 Fifth Revision and those pertinent directives contained in Section
17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the City Municipal Code.
Staff has reviewed the project with adjacent neighborhoods and proposed
development and finds that it complements their quality of construction,
provides a pleasing use of color and materials, demonstrates a respect for
privacy and views, and offers visually attractive landscaping and open space
amenities. The Fire Department, Policy Department and Community
Services Department have worked with the architect to develop an efficient,
strategic and cohesive layout.
3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been
incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development
of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and the
planning district in which the site is located.
Staff has provided conditions regarding landscaping, monumentation,
lighting, and fencing.
SECTION 3. Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and
the attached conditions of approval imposed upon the Project, the Planning
Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Commercial
Design Review 2007-03.
SECTION 4 This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
AGfND:'. iTEM rIO.
p.rteE 9
3
OF .; tf
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_
PAGE40F4
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this first day of May, 2007, by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
ATTEST:
Rolfe Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
AGENDA iTEM NO. 3
PAGE 10 o~.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW
NO. 2007-03~ ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION~ COMMUNITY
CENTER & PARK @ RAMSGATE~ IN TRACT MAP 25479
PLANNING DIVISION
(Note: Fees listed in the Conditions of Approval are the best estimates available at
the time of approval. The exact fee amounts will be reviewed at the time of
building permit issuance and may be revised.)
1. Approval Expiration. Design Review approval for Commercial Project No.
2007-03 will lapse and be void unless a building permit is issued within one
(1) year of the City Council approval date.
2. Indemnity. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the
City, its officials, officers, employees, and/or agents from any claim, action,
or proceeding against the City, its officials, officers, employees, or agents
concerning the project attached hereto.
3. Notice Filing. The City intends to file a Notice of Exemption with the
Riverside County Clerk's office within five business days from the approval
of this Design Review by the City Council.
4. Revision to Plans. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on
the approved plotting plan and building elevations or as specified by these
Conditions of Approval. Any other revisions to the approved plotting plan or
building elevations shall be subject to approval of the Community
Development Director or designee.
a. The applicant shall correct the Assessor's Parcel Numbers in the
legend of the site plan to read: 347-120-050 and -053.
5. Use of Colors & Materials. Materials and colors depicted on the approved
materials boards shall be used unless modified by the applicant and approved
by the Community Development Director or designee.
Page 1 of16
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
PAGE II OF ~.f'
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW
NO. 2007-03~ ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION~ COMMUNITY
CENTER & PARK (tV, RAMSGATE~ IN TRACT MAP 25479
a. The applicant shall use Mission clay tile roofing materials with a
Class "A" fire rating.
6. ADA Requirements. Applicant shall meet all American with Disabilities Act
requirements for access to the fire station, community center and park
facilities.
7. Prior Approvals. Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the
underlying Tract Map No. 25479, and Ramsgate Specific Plan No. 89-1 Fifth
Revision, unless superceded by these conditions. Where these documents are
silent, the project shall comply with all applicable City Codes and Ordinances.
a. Applicant shall comply with all relevant Mitigation Monitoring
Program requirements as set forth in Addendum No.3 to the Final
Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SCH 88090525) for
Ramsgate Specific Plan No. 89-1. Applicant shall provide a
Mitigation Monitoring Program Report on a quarterly basis during
construction.
8. RDA. This project is not within a designated Redevelopment Agency Project
Area.
9. Hours of Construction. The City's Noise Ordinance shall be met during all
site preparation activity. Construction shall not commence before 7:00 a.m.
and shall cease at 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Construction activity
shall not take place on Saturday, Sunday or any legal holidays.
10. Construction Trailers. A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any
construction trailers used during construction. Bonds will be released after
removal of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to
the approval of the Community Development Director or designee.
Page 2 of 16
AGENDA ITEM NO. ] J>
PAGE I/l.. OF __
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW
NO. 2007-03~ ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION~ COMMUNITY
CENTER & PARK @ RAMSGATE~ IN TRACT MAP 25479
11. EVMWD. The project shall connect to sewer and meet all requirements for
water availability of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD).
Applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to the EVMWD and shall
incorporate all district conditions and standards, including payment of
applicable water and sewer connection fees. The applicant shall submit a
"Will Serve" letter from the District.
12. SCE. The applicant shall submit a "Will Serve" letter from Southern
California Edison stating that electrical service will be provided to the project.
13. Fire Department Requirements. The applicant shall comply with the
conditions of approval submitted by the Riverside County Fire Department
dated April 3, 2007.
14. Walls & Fences. All perimeter walls shall be coated with anti-graffiti paint.
15. Any retaining walls visible to the public shall match the interior masonry block
walls in color and style.
16. Any tubular steel view fence installed shall be of industrial-grade material for
safety purposes.
17. FMZ. The applicant shall abide by the approved Fuel Modification Plan for
Tract 25479, and all conditions of approval of said tract.
18. Signage. All signage shall be reviewed and approved by the Community
Development Director or his designee, and shall require the issuance of a Sign
Permit as appropriate.
a. Applicant shall install comer monumentation and landscaping prior to the
first Certificate of Occupancy. Construction drawings shall include their
Page 3 of 16
AGENDA ITEM NO. '3
PAGE 1.9 OF ..31
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW
NO. 2007-03. ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION. COMMUNITY
CENTER & PARK @ RAMSGATE. IN TRACT MAP 25479
location, size, identification, color and materials, in compliance with the
Design Guidelines of the Ramsgate Specific Plan.
b. Applicant shall install an entry monument for the western parking lot,
indicating it as access to the baseball fields.
Prior to Issuance of Building/Grading Permits
19. Acknowledgment of Conditions. Prior to issuance of any precise grading
permits or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an
"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the
Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records.
20. Grading Ordinance Compliance. Applicant shall comply with all requirements
of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion
shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code,
Chapter 15.72 and using accepted control techniques. Interim erosion control
measures shall be provided thirty (30) days after the site's rough grading, as
approved by the City Engineer.
21. Trash Enclosures. The applicant shall work with staff to locate a trash
enclosure for the Community Center, prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
22. ConcessionJRestrooms. The applicant shall submit building plans and
elevations for the concession building prior to the issuance of building permit,
with the design of the building to match up to other buildings on site. These
plans are subject to review and approval by the Director of Community
Development or his designee.
23. Plancheck Submittal. These Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced upon
Page 4 of 16
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
PAGE I~ OF 3 f'
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW
NO. 2007-03~ ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION~ COMMUNITY
CENTER & PARK em RAMSGATE~ IN TRACT MAP 25479
Page One of the Building Plans prior to their acceptance by the Building and
Safety Division.
24. UBC. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Building
Division building plans that are designed to current UBC and adopted codes,
and meet all applicable Building and Safety Division requirements.
25. Driveways. Driveways shall be constructed of concrete per Building and
Safety Division standards.
26. Building Addresses. The building addresses shall be a minimum of four
inches (4") high and shall be easily visible from the public right-of-way.
Developer shall obtain street addresses for all project lots prior to issuance of
building permits. The addresses (in numerals at least four inches (4" high)
shall be displayed near the entrance and be visible from the front of the unit.
Care should be taken to select colors and materials that contract with building
walls or trim.
27. Meeting with Contractor. Prior to Building Permits the Construction
Supervisor shall meet with the Planning Division to review the Conditions of
Approval.
28. Landscape & Irrigation Plans. The project shall be properly landscaped with
an automatic irrigation system using a combination of drip and conventional
irrigation methods. The final Landscaping Plans and Irrigation Details for
each plan shall be required, and a Cost Estimate shall be submitted for review
and approval by the Community Development Director or Designee prior to
issuance of building permits. A Landscape Plan Check Fee and Inspection Fee
shall be paid for the entire project at the time of submittal.
Page 5 of 16
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
PAGE /5' OF .31
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW
NO. 2007-03. ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION. COMMUNITY
CENTER & PARK @ RAMSGATE. IN TRACT MAP 25479
a. Street Trees. The applicant shall install street trees to match existing
street trees a maximum of thirty feet (30') apart, and at least twenty-
four inch (24") box in size.
b. Sight Visibility. Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress
points shall be no higher than thirty-six-inches (36").
c. Water Conservation. The landscape plan shall provide for ground
cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the City's
adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to the use of
Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip
irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive watering.
d. Easements. Landscaping shall be shown and installed on both sides of
any drainage easements.
e. Drainage facilities. Particular attention shall be given to the screening
of drainage facilities from public view or adjacent residences.
f. Tree preservation. The applicant shall preserve as many healthy,
mature trees as feasible that may be removed from the existing raised
landscaped median in Rosetta Canyon Drive. These trees shall be
relocated to the project site, to enhance the streetscene or park areas.
g. Slope Landscaping. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet in
height within the subject tract and within private lots shall have a
permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed,
as approved by the Landscape Architect and Planning Division, prior
to issuance of certificate of occupancy.
h. Buffering Adiacent Uses. Particular attention shall be given to the
separation area between the ball field parking lot and the west
Page 6 of 16
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3>
PAGE lto OF JK
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW
NO. 2007-03~ ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION~ COMMUNITY
CENTER & PARK @ RAMSGATE~ IN TRACT MAP 25479
property line. The applicant shall locate the perimeter block wall and
select appropriate landscaping to maximize the screening vehicle
headlights and noise from the adjacent apartments. Landscaping shall
also be used to minimize the opportunity for graffiti.
1. Perimeter Landscaping. The project shall install streetscape along
Rosetta Canyon Drive and Ardenwood Way, including the comer
monument, by the completion of Phase I. Staff is aware that
landscaping must not affect the sight visibility of the fire trucks
leaving the station onto Rosetta Canyon Drive.
J. Landscape Bond. All landscape improvements shall be bonded with a
10 percent Faithful Performance Bond for labor and materials for one
year from Certificate of Occupancy.
29. Ground Mounted Equipment. All mechanical and electrical equipment on the
building shall be ground mounted. All outdoor ground or wall mounted utility
equipment shall be consolidated in a central location and architecturally
screened along with substantial landscaping, subject to the approval of the
Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permits. If
the equipment is placed behind the fencing, landscaping will not be required.
Air conditioning and related equipment located in side yards shall maintain a
minimum of 3 feet of unobstructed, leveled clearance between the equipment
and the adjacent property line.
30. Ball Field Lighting. The applicant shall install MUSCO lighting systems at
the ball fields, at a height of 70 to 90 feet.
31. Supplemental Parking Lot Lighting. The applicant shall install low-pressure
sodium lighting in the west parking lot adjacent to the residential apartments
to the west.
Page 7 of 16
AGENDA ITEM NO. '3
PAGE 17 OF ~i'
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW
NO. 2007-03~ ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION~ COMMUNITY
CENTER & PARK @ RAMSGATE~ IN TRACT MAP 25479
32. Community Center Lighting. The applicant shall install metal halide or high-
pressure sodium lighting at the Community Center, Fire Station, and game
courts, where color rendition and differentiation may be important during
night-time activities.
33. All facility external lighting shall be turned off by 10 p.m. in accordance with
City Ordinances.
Prior to Final Approval
34. Issuance of Occupancy. The applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval
prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
General Requirements
35. A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall
be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern
is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is
less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit
shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection
can be conducted before grading begins.
36. Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant shall provide to the
City a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export
material. Such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City
Engineer.
37. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and
he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion
control.
Page 8 of 16
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
PAGE 18 OF ~i'
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW
NO. 2007-03~ ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION~ COMMUNITY
CENTER & PARK em RAMSGATE~ IN TRACT MAP 25479
38. This project shall comply with applicable Conditions of Approval of Tract
25479.
39. Phasing Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. Bond public
improvements for each Phase as approved by the City Engineer.
40. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work on City right-of-
way.
41. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults,
etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property
owner or his agent. Overhead utilities shall be undergrounded.
42. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the
provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's
agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District.
43. The applicant shall install permanent bench marks per Riverside County
Standards and at locations to be determined by the City Engineer.
44. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County
Fire Department.
45. Install blue dot reflective markers at all fire hydrant locations.
46. Applicant shall pay all applicable development fees, including but not all
inclusive: TUMF, MSHCP, TIF and area drainage fees.
47. Ten-year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100-year
storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of
these criteria are exceeded, drainage facilities shall be provided.
Page 9 of 16
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
PAGE 1'1 OF..:J r
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW
NO. 2007-03~ ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION~ COMMUNITY
CENTER & PARK @ RAMSGATE~ IN TRACT MAP 25479
48. All drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed to Riverside County
Flood Control District Standards.
49. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie
notes delineated on 8 'li" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering
Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be
scheduled and approved.
50. Slope maintenance along public right-of-ways shall be maintained by a
maintenance mechanism as approved by the City.
51. All open space and slopes (except for schools) and flood control facilities
outside the public right-of-way shall be owned and maintained by an entity
approved by the City.
52. All landscaping at intersections shall meet City Sight Distance Standards.
53. All waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during
cleaning, demolition, clearing and grubbing or other phases of the
construction shall be disposed of at appropriate recycling centers. The
applicant should contract with CR&R Inc. for recycling and storage container
services, but the applicant may use the services of another recycling vendor.
Another recycling vendor, other than CR&R Inc., cannot charge the applicant
for bin rental or solid waste disposal. If the applicant is not using CR&R Inc.
for recycling services and the recycling material is either sold or donated to
another vendor, the applicant shall supply proof of debris disposal at a
recycling center, including verification of tonnage by certified weigh master
tickets.
54. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent
property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage
easement.
Page 10 of 16
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~
PAGE <<0 OF~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW
NO. 2007-03~ ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION~ COMMUNITY
CENTER & PARK (Q2 RAMSGATE~ IN TRACT MAP 25479
55. All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or
shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer.
56. Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street
curb. Roofs should drain to a landscaped area.
57. Applicant shall comply with all NPDES requirements in effect; including the
submittal of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as required per the
Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. The requirements of
WQMP may affect the overall layout of the project. Therefore, WQMP
submittal should be during the initial process of the project.
58. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be
provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides,
fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on
good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water
quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside
County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. (Required for lots of one
acre or more.)
59. Applicant shall provide BMP's that will reduce storm water pollutants from
parking areas and driveway aisles. (Required for lots of one acre or more.)
60. City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management
and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local
storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain
systems or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges
containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of
"Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing
measures are available at City Hall.
PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain
Page 11 of 16
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
PAGE rJ../ OF d'$"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW
NO. 2007-03~ ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION~ COMMUNITY
CENTER & PARK (tV, RAMSGATE~ IN TRACT MAP 25479
system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit
or waiver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
61. Streets with a slope greater than 9% shall be redesigned to 9% or less, unless
approved by the City Engineer.
62. Maintenance access shall be provided to all open spaces and drainage
facilities and easements.
63. A Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare street and traffic
improvement plans and specifications for the street improvements as shown
on the Site Plan. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside
County Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34).
Street improvement plans shall include curb and gutter, sidewalk, street
lighting, ac pavement and drainage improvements.
64. The applicant shall make an offer of dedication for all public streets and
easements required by these conditions or as shown on the Site Plan. All land
so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and
encumbrances and without cost to the City.
65. Applicant shall submit signing and striping plans for the required street
improvements. All signing and striping and traffic control devices shall be
installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. The signing and
striping shall include Street Name Signs, "No Parking" and Street Sweeping
Signs for streets within the project.
66. Submit grading plans with appropriate security, Hydrology, and Hydraulic
Reports prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer for approval by the City
Engineer. The grading plans shall include mitigation/protection of any
Page 12 ofl6
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
PAGE ~:l. OF~
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW
NO. 2007-03~ ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION~ COMMUNITY
CENTER & PARK (tV, RAMSGATE~ IN TRACT MAP 25479
flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or
diversion of drainage. The grading plan shall also show that no structures,
landscaping, or equipment are located near or at street intersections, in order
to meet sight distance standards.
67. Construction Project access and hauling route plan shall be submitted and
approved by the City Engineer,
68. Provide soils, geology and seism\c report including street design
recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with
recommendations.
69. An Alquist-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden
earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on-site.
70. The applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements and/or permits for
off-site grading and/or drainage acceptance from the adjacent property owners
prior to grading permit issuance.
71. The applicant shall provide erosion control measures as part of their grading
plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and
meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County
NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan.
72. Applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a Notice of
Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program with a storm
water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The
applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post-construction, which describes
BMP's that will be implemented for the development including maintenance
responsibilities. The applicant shall submit the SWPPP to the City for review
and approval.
Page 13 of16
AGENDA ITEM NO. '3
PAGE ~ OF .~!
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW
NO. 2007-03. ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION. COMMUNITY
CENTER & PARK (tV, RAMS GATE. IN TRACT MAP 25479
73. The applicant shall provide an approved WQMP plan.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
74. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the
applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been
made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the
location. such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter prior to
applying for a building permit.
75. Provide proof that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are located at
intersections and street curves that could compromise sight distance
requirements.
76. WQMP and erosion control plans shall be in place to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer.
77. Pay all Capital Improvement TIF and Master Drainage Fees, and Plan Check
fees (LEMC 16.34).
78. Signing and striping plans on-site and on Rosetta Canyon and on Ardenwood
Way shall be submitted for review.
79. On-site lighting plan and lighting distribution plan shall be submitted for
review to determine minimum light disturbance to residential areas.
80. Provide public street lighting at the project driveways on Ardenwood Way.
Existing street lights may be relocated to meet this requirement as applicable.
81. A solar powered flashing beacon with remote activation capabilities shall be
provided on Rosetta Canyon on both approaches to the Fire Station driveway.
Page 14 of 16
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~
PAGE ~4 OF 4K--
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW
NO. 2007-03~ ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION~ COMMUNITY
CENTER & PARK @ RAMSGATE~ IN TRACT MAP 25479
Prior to Occupancy
82. Pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the
Engineering Division for construction of off-site public works improvements
(LEMCI2.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment
permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy.
83. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie
notes delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering
Division before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled
and approved.
84. All public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved
plans or as conditioned of this development and/or applicable conditions of
Tract 25479, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All Public Works
improvements shall be complied with as a condition of development as
specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). The improvements
shall include street and drainage improvements, street lighting, and associated
traffic improvements related to the project.
85. All signing and striping and traffic control devices shall be installed. This
includes Street Name Signs, "No Parking" and Street Sweeping Signs for
streets and drive aisles within the site.
86. Water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with Water
District requirements.
87. Proof of acceptance and maintenance responsibility shall be provided for all
open spaces, slopes, and drainage facilities.
88. TUMF fees shall be paid. The TUMF fees shall be the effective rate at the
time when the Certificate of Occupancy is obtained.
Page 15 of16
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
PAGE tA.5 OF JT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW
NO. 2007-03~ ROSETTA CANYON FIRE STATION~ COMMUNITY
CENTER & PARK (tV, RAMSGATE~ IN TRACT MAP 25479
89. Post-construction erosion controls and landscaping shall be installed and
approved by the City Engineer.
90. The flashing beacon shall be operational when the Fire Station is in full
operation.
91. The applicant shall submit as-built plans. Once approved by the Engineering
Department, the applicant shall submit as-built plans on mylars. A digital
copy of all completed public improvement plans shall be provided. A bond
(amount to be determined by the City Engineer) is required to guarantee
compliance of this requirement.
Fire Department Conditions of Approval dated 04/03/07 attached.
Page 16 of 16
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
PAGE ~(, OF ~f
APR-03-2007 TUE 12: 48 PM R I'L CO FIRE P&E
FAX NO. 951 955 4886
p, 02
04/03/07
13:09
Riversiqe County LMS
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 1
Library Conditions
10. GENERAL CONDITlONS
FIRE DEPARTMENT
l-I.i -,Di-'~ P-O' e
lO.FIRE.999
CASE - CITY CASE STATEMENT
DRAFT
With respect to the oonditions ot approval for the
referenced project, the Fire Department recommends the
following fire protection measures be provided in
accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or
recognized fire protection standards:
10.FIRE.999
USE-#50-BLUE DOT REFLECTOR
DRAFT
Blue retroreflective pavement markers shall be mounted on
private street, puplio st:reets and driveways to indicate
location of fire hydrants. Prior to installation, placement
of markers must be approved by the Riverside County Fire
Department.
lO,FIRE.999 USE*-#23-:MIN R:81Q F!RE FLOW DRAFT
Minimum required fire flow shall be ~~PM for a ~ hour
duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must
be available before any cOmb4stible mater~ ~s.. placed on
the job site. Fire flow is based on type-~
construction per the 2001 CBC c;;md Building(s) having a fire
sprinkler system.
10.FIRE.999
USE-#31-0N/OFF NOT LOOPED HYD
DRAFT
A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrant(sJ
(611x41fx2 1/211X2 1/2"), will be located not less than 25
feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the
building as measured along approveo vehicular travel ways.
The required fire flow I3h,;i.ll PEa available from any
adjacent bydrants(s) in the system.
10.FIRE.999
USE-#84-T1WK .l?ERMITS
DRAFT
Applicant or Developer shi~ll bt~ responsible for obtaining
under/aboveground fuel, chemical and mixed liquid storage
tanl(: permits, from the Riverside County Fire :Department and
Environmental Health DepaJ:tments. Plans must be submi t ted
for approval prior to installation. Aboveground fuel/mixed
liquid tanks (s) shall meet; the following standard: Tank
must be tested and labeled to UL2085 1?rotected Tanl<
Standard or SwRI 93-01. The test must include the
Proj ectile J?enetration Tes;t and the Heavy Vehicle Impact
Test. A sample copy of the~ tanh: I s lapel from an independent
ACE.)V "3
,,_~t< .~!
APR-03-2007 TUE 12:51 PM RIV_ CO FIRE P&E
FAX NO. 951 955 4886
P. 03
04/03/07
13:09
Riverside CO'Llnty LMS
CONDIT:J:ONS OF APPROVAL
Page; 2
Library Conditions
10. GENERAL CONDITIONS
10.FIRE.999
USE-#84-'l'ANK :PERMITS (cont.)
DRAFT
test laboratory must be inclu~ed with your plans. (current
plan check deposit base fee is $217.00 for first tank, each
additional tank $32.00.)
10.FIRE.999
USE - # 25 - C2IATE ENTRANCES
DRAFT
Gate entrances shall be at least two feet wider than the
width of the traffic lane:(s) serving that gate. Any gate
providing access from a x'oad to a driveway shall be located
at least 35 feet from the roadway and shall open to allow a
vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic on the road.
Where a one-way road with a single traffic lane provides
access to a gate entrance, a 40 foot turning radius shall
be used.
10. FIRE. 999 USB* -#88A,-AUTO/MAN GATES DRAFT
Gate(s) shall be automatic operated, minimum ~~teet in
width, with a setback of 35 feet from face of curb/flow
line. Gate access shall be equipped with a rapid entry
system. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for
approval prior to installation. Automatic/manual gate pins
shall be rated with shear pin force, not to exceed 30 foot
pounds. Automatic gates shall :be equipped wi th emergency
backup power. Gates activated :Py the rapid entry system
shall remain open until closed by the rapid entry system.
(current plan check deposit base fee is $126.00)
80. PRIOR TO BLDG PRMT ISSUANCE
FIRE DEPARTMENT
80.fIRE.999
J?C*-#17A~PLAN CHECK FEE
DRAFT
Building plans have been :L:eviewed~however; a separate plan
check deposit base fee of $~~~made payable to the
Riverside County Fire Department in the form of a check or
money order only, must be submitted to the Fire
Department. (reference your bui:LQing ,permit number)
BO.FJRE.999
PC-#4 -WATJ~R PL}\NS
DRAFT
pplicant and/or developer shall separately submit 2 sets of
the water system plans to the Fire Department. Prior to
F~re Department review and approval the water plans must be
s1gneQ and approved by a registered Civil Engineer and/or
ACENDA iTEM r~o. 3
PACE ~1 OF oJ&'
APR-03-2007 rUE 12:53 PM RIV CO FIRE P&E
FAX NO, 951 955 4886
p, 04
04/03/07
13:09
Riverside Cotmty LMS
CONDI'I':WNS OF APl?ROVAL
Page; 3
Library Conditions
80. PRIOR TO BLDG PRMT ISSUANCE
80.FIRE.999
PC-#4 -WA1:'ER PLANS (cant.)
DRAFT
the local water purveyor with the following statement: "I
certify that the design of the water system is in
accordance with the requ:i.rements prescJ:'ibed by the
Riverside County Fire Departmelnt. II Calculated velocities
~hall not exceed 10 feet per second. Plans shall conform to
the fire hydrant types, location, spacing and the system
shall meet the fire flow requirements. Blue retroreflective
pavement markers shall be mounted on private streets,
public streets and driveways to indicate location of fire
hydrants. (contact Fire De:partment for guideline handout
for blue dot retroflectors). After mylars are signed by the
fire department and/or WCl.ter purveyor 2 copies of the
approved water system sha.ll be returned to the Riverside
County Fire Department before a building permit will be
issued.
90. PRIOR TO BLDG FINAL INSPECTION
FIRE DEPARTMENT
90.FIRE.999
USE-#4S-FIRE LANES
DRAFT
The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site p:).an designating required
fire lanes with appropr1ate lane painting and/or signs.
90.FIRE.999
USE-#12A-SPRINKLER SYSTEM
DRAFT
!nstall a complete fire sprinkler system per NFPA 13 1999
eClition in all buildings requi:ring a fire flow of 1500 GPM
or greater. Sprinkler sys'tem(s) with pipe sizes in excess
of 4" in diamter will require the project structural
engineer to certify (wet signature) the stability of the
building system for seismic and gravity loads to support
the sprinkler system. All fire sprinkler risers shall be
protected from any physici~l Clamage. The post indicator
valve an~ fire department connection shall be located to
the front, within 50 feet of a hyCl,rant, and a minimum of 25
feet from the bui1ding(s). A statement that the building(s)
will be automatically fire sprinkled must be included On
the title page of the ~uilding plans.
(current sprinkler plan check deposit base fee is $614.00
per riser)
Applicant or developer sh~1.11 bEl responsible to install a
V.L. Central Station Monitored Fire Alarm System.
i! :3
~',.'f ;l9 ~f
6" \".....,.....,.".."'........i..~.i,"~."'"'"",..c_,
APR-03~2007 TUE 12:54 PM RI~_ CO FIRE P&E
FAX NO, 951 955 4886
p, 05
04/03/07
13:09
Riverside County LMS
CONDITJONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 4
Library Conditions
90. PRIOR TO BLDG F!NAL INSPECTION
90.f'IRE.999
USE-#12A-SPR!NKLEilR SYSTEM (cont.)
DRAFT
Monitoring system shall monitor the fire sprinkler
system(s) water flow, P.I.V. Ie and all control valves.
Plans must be submitted to thE: Fire Department for
approval prior to installation. Contact fire department
for guideline handout (c'l.:~rrent monitoring plan check.
deposit base fee is $192.00) \ ~
( ICO"""''''~f''''' e.. ,,\ It' )
90. fIRE. 999 USE-#83 -ll.UTO/M1U'l" FIRE ALARM
DRAFT
Applicant or developer snaIl be responsible to install a
manual and automatic Fire Alarm System. Plans must be
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to
installation. (current plan check deposit base fee is
$627.00)
90.FIRE.999
U8E-#27-EXTINGU!SHERS
DRAFT
Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating
of 2A-l0SC and signage. Fire Extinguishers located in
public areas shall be in recessed cabinets mounteo, 4811
(inches) to center apove floor level with maximum 411
projection from the wall. Contact Fire Department for
proper placement of e~uipment prior to installation.
\. l...~~..-,~",\ l.~ .,.~
90.FIRE.999 USE-#36-HOOD OUCTS
DRAFT
A U.L. 300 hOOQ duct fire extinguishing system must be
installed over the cookin~3" equipment. Wet chemical
extinguishing system must provicte automatic shutdown of all
electrical componets and outlets Uncter the hood upon
activation. System must bE= installeq by a licensed C-16
contractor. Plans must be submitted with current
fee to the Fire Department for review and approval prior
to installation.
NOTE: A dec;licated alarm f;lystem is not required to be
installed for the exclusive purpose of monitoring this
suppression system. However, a new or pre-existing alarm
system must be connected to thE~ extinguishing system. (*
separate fire alarm plans must be submitted for connection)
(current plan check deposit base fee is $215.00)
AClENOl:\ m;ril NO.
PAGE -dO
3
OF at
-
'-'- = -~ - '1:dltosEmCMYONno" - - - - - ,
..t..o ''''"'":'' -- r.- ':;"'-~~.bL~~"'~&_'-~~~~&':"'~__~-..:r-h-;'
_~ I h~:iI" - :l<.:._
.' ''\
-< ~ ~ ; 1 ~ . ~., ~ 1\
.;,.....-- Jlli~' . ~'" \ \\
::i tj~' ,~I. I~.... '-j' I\'
"' I, , ., '" ~ ,,,.' "
f I!~I", . ,:'::'~"~ .' ~l~~' ~ '~~
l,,! ~Ii ~~; l%-..)Y '~\\ -
l!illl;: I H -:Zi." 1'Il/lI/ 1 o\,'.......(:~ . \\ ,\ I~
~n V'! './ ~F' ~---;~ III I\~
,. ~'r;:9 .' ;- I ~.,~ !!I(
~----- ~ U- ,--------~ i/t I
i:.- / ~. '",.. -, w/f//A,p;;
:! '~i.f.\~'~ t---.- "'~i),'-,i ~---I/ i~ljl
/ lie "" 7P'"\ .,. 6 . IP
,/ 'A.,oo&o,l ----........ ' /, /1
::-::=: ,/ , . . '~ .' 6 Z i rg
~ /~/~jrmr; J.\ / K~,)W' ~ :0'7 ;d.
~ 79': ~. .1II'....... ~jJ /" J. r "I ~ II /
~ "" "'.f' I 'Jl III 11//1/ /
7;. \- ~' . ~~ ~ ~~ 1/ '///il)
"', ~~~ i / all/
I ;; /"'''' ...... ~s . " ~~ i~/1 11/'
/, ~Ii j('" , ~ \ \\ \ :
I. l. I~" ~ // ~ \
, ~l / "~ {j // ~ '" '\,
, / I fl.1 ~II''''/~<~/~>~'''''~''
t , -w~. ~ ~ 7:S~1
\ ' -,.. G:" .~ ;;.}:;; ACiE.NDA ITEM NO. ~
13 / rJf ' ,~ tl PACE ~/ OF .3'6
.1
~fJ T.
~ :1~1 m
y~ I\.''\.~
~.~..... ~-I> ~
<; . ~
m $- ~
~I
h
U~
E'1.. ;- ~... ry " ~.,.-. '.. -.--,
. ~..;' 1,'''. .~'" " "_,' ~'.'., ,.' ~
J"~"h~g~ ~
.... ~~~~ . Iii
'"
0 ZO
z
~ ~>=~o( I i I ~~i ~~N
uo( a. ~
.... Io(tii~~ I I i sl a..""~ I
~ l5 1=....:>0: ~b~~ i<(
Is 1lJ{0:~~ Ii r !~~H ~ ...J:1:0.
oG:~", jo.a. j
0: U
I ~ ~~
! ~ "~ ill !~h9
i h ~ ~~ ~ !~~~ ~~! i 98~!~!
I Ii! ~ !~~! S;~~~:;il e ~ ;;Bi~: g
iii~ I ! ~~ i~ ~li.hff ~ 'i'~ 5~~ ; .
!!;~~ ~:~: ~i3;1 I : ~:i:i! ~ i I~ ~I~ili !;~ ~~;ii I ~!
I!I~~ ~~1I9fl~i ll~~~~ Si= II~ Ss U a ~~2 Ii "s! b!i.1i I~s ~!!; Sill lai'IL f 5~
~!fi"!~I~i~l il"I!lli!Il!l1.li,ll.l!iii~l!I;lii.iiil!I!!!;I!!!!llltil;l;!II,i!li!~!jti!!
-
n r _.r
j r" Ii lltHii-j ..... .....
:U~\\ .~ i/c Jli' SIIFJ.
~<~
~
. ~
N
........Q.. ~
--~~
~..,
"
N
o/l
:::::--:.:: ~
v: '!SI
~~\\\'
llii
III
~
w
CfJ
<>:
J:
a.
Z
~
a.
f-
a
...J
a.
/
.......
\ .... ~zl11:.:: .lli
'I Q::
0 ~~
Z zo~Q::
~ ~~ ~ i J. is
.... <:n?:~ ~ I ~ 7~i ~c.. N
I I I i ~I "'0:: I
~ ~ ~....~~ = VlO i<(
I I ....Q::::illl B i !~i;t ~ wo
~ :g[;:~ i a::...J i
<3 Q:: (,) u:u.
....
.(t)' .~
i
i!I cnJ
i! "--ir-' ...,~
~ fti3fkJ
8 .. ...~~-"~,'
'I 6 \\
',Jr, ,~.I
J:~,
....... MI
111-' 2 I IN
-~--;-~_n_n
T[.j----aj-----
: l .lrr....T1~ ::
lr I!~!l II
II II
II It II r
It II II I
II II II I
===:Q:=======Q==== ===:Q:~
____u________.Jl. ______ __U_.J
EXHiB~l~
\0-1
z
:5
a..
0::
o
o
....J
I.J...
Z
o
i=
~
en
UJ
0::
I.J...
"'.l!\t
AGENDA ITEM r~o.
PAGE J~ OF
3
31
,
\
\ lU ~i5~~ 8~...
.1 '"
0 .1,1 ~o:~
z ~F~<
Vi ~ , ~ ~~i
j;j 0< Q. ~QS CtJ
!<liiEI!! I I iI ~! ,...0: I
ni I=lUS'" g~~~ i/<(
15 IlU"'~~ B i !hH ~
~[L~1Il iO:W...J i
'" (.) ii: W
~
0:
0
Z
~
g ~
'" "-
0 ~
0:
'"'
0 ~
If 0:
~ ...
;; ~
;;
z
0 z
i= 0
~ z ~ z
W 0 > 0
...J ~ W i=
W ...J
,... > W ~
en W ,...
<( ...J III W
...J
~ W ~ w
i!: i!:
0 ::J <( a:
0: 0 W 0
u. en a: z
L-.i~:'l~b~ f~
\D'
AQ A ITEM NO.
~CE ,y OF f
\ .... ~zlQ" .l~i
15 ~o~
z ~g~~ I ~i5
~ u<cut>. a I q~~ . ~OZO ,.
.... I<cli;~~ o::O<CF=
.1 Hs l=....~Q: I I ~I ~~~~ i<t:
' i 15 I....Q:~~ u i !S~;J a
~G:8 j W Q. ..J i
0:: W
"7 ,., ..,.
" " ~~ ~j
r ~ ,i
" "
~ w: ti$ 11:$
I~ i~
H , II
~)\~""~ ~ b~ r
~
F
~
~
w
.....
en
<
w
~
F
~
W
....J
W
.....
en
<
w
z
o
F
~
~
w
!ii
~
~
F
~
~
w
j!:
=>
o
en
z
o
F
~
~
w
j!:
0::
o
Z
~ ~
~~
~
w~
f
,
I
---[~r--[[
...."
\ -,
f::-
"f::J!'
~
I
I
~..~
Ilf"f~"""r"""
III ~ III
lll.::~ ~ ~
Ilf"l. r"""
lU L III
~~ :-lll
'"(1'._.-a..l
~..~
~
..,
o
en
z
o
F
~
W
....J
W
0::
o
iE
I!:!
\ w ~z~:<: .1"
.1 ~
z zo~1r .1 ,j;j . ~Q:~
~ C3~ ~ l.{')
w !<lii~1!! 5~a. I
f 15 ~w5a:: I I ~! (:!: z g5 i <(
I wa::::o~ U I !hU ~ :;wo
Is IOU....
:gG:~lIl () U. I
ct: ()
N
. .~
i
L
~
c.'J
a:
lis
z
<X:
....J
0..
0:::
0
0
....J
LL
0:::
..." OQ< UJ
f-
z
'1 - UJ
()
~
z
::>
:::?:
:::?:
0
()
,.
.... CIQ<
,.
Q
~i
Ti
.~
!z
o
a:
u..
---0---
o
li~ .
---Q---
o
..
.........
T'lDWCIlfJ'nL
m_ m_ ___ ~~~~ ___ ___ ___
F,----"1I:- -- -"t"----":II:----"3r----"t"----"t"____lI
:: ::
,I "
H "
" "
" I,
~ ~
" "
,I II
" "
~ ~
I' "
,I I,
,I I,
~ ~
,I II
,I I,
" "
" ~
" I,
" "
" "
~ ~
.' I,
" "
" I,
~ ~
" "
Jl II
~ ~
:1 I:
" II
~ W
:1 I:
,I II
H w
I! II
1t:-------ll:.::..-_-_-_111:.::..-_-_-.a.::..-_-_-.3I:.-_-_-_~-_-_-_--#--------::tl
~
l.~
J
oi
l\~
I
~I~
Hi! Ii :dJ"
L.:I----n----n----n--- -n----.....I-+-----n------rr------l-+.-----n----n----n----n----
---- ---- ---- ---- ----..L..l..J.._____ ______ _____~---- ____ ____ ____ ____
H
1..;.;' \. tiUQ ~ W" I
\F/
-
AGE.NDA ITEM NO.
PACE ~.5
3
OF ..31
-
'I L.U ~z~'" .!@!
l5
z zoili~ ~ ~~i ~oc~ 1O
Vi ~~<'>Q.
...J ~I n~" ~~~ I
L.U I <liifl!!
~15 l=L.U?i25 I I ~I a~m~ i<C
15 ItljO::::EQ. B d~~H ~ iOu...J
oCi:i!i'" U LU ~
0:: <.>
L-::: c..' ;"." . ."-". ~,~
~)'\.~ H:3 j I
\6/
c=J
~
2S
5~
~~
(jj~
...Jw
LUOO
I-~
CIl::li
<0
LUa:
u.
~
~
>-
z~
00
i=8
~~
~~
W!l
~::li
oc~
ou.
z~
~
511
It
!al
I,
II
.
o
C!l
o
...J
~
U
o
LU
C!l
oc
::5
z
LU
il
~;
--:'fIf
PAOE ~~ OF ..if
I 3S'Y"Hd - ~'Y"d NOJ..N'Y":J 'Y" J.J.3S0C!=!
Q '':'''';''';'''10
U "",.. ...~"""'l ....""'I-IJToIlold
~L
-
I
A CKNOWLEDEGEMENT OF
DRAFT CONDITIONS
RE: Commercial Design Review 2007-03 - Rosetta Canyon Fire Station,
Community Center and Park
I hereby state that I/We acknowledge the draft Conditions of Approval for the above
named project. I/We understand that these are draft conditions only and do hereby agree
to accept and abide by all final conditions prescribed by the City of Lake Elsinore staff,
as set forth in the attachments to the approval letter that will be sent after final proj ect
approval.
All final conditions shall be met prior to issuance of permits or prior to the first
Certificate of Occupancy, or otherwise indicated in the Conditions, subject to the
approval of the Community Development Director of the City of Lake Elsinore.
Date: April 25, 2007
.---:'-;:;.::~~:~ . ..,..:.:;.-:.:~..,.
Applicant's Signature:~~~
Print Name: Matt Pressey
City of Lake Elsinore Director of
Administrative Services
Address:
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
(951) 674-3124
Phone Number:
rr."u" '+:"'..;" j
Av,_~\J,'nl ~ ;'\; .-
PAGE j8 Of_~S
-
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
TO:
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE:
MAY 1, 2007
PREPARED BY:
TOM WEINER, PLANNING MANAGER
PROJECT TITLE:
ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT NO.
2007-02; A REQUEST TO AMEND PORTIONS OF
THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATED TO THE MODIFICATION OF THE
MINIMUM ON-SITE LANDSCAPE COVERAGE
PERCENTAGE REQUIREMENTS WITHIN
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONES
APPLICANT:
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, 130 SOUTH MAIN
STREET, LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530
PURPOSE
This report is intended to present information to the Planning Commission in order to
make a recommendation to the City Council regarding a Zoning Ordinance Text
Amendment. The proposed amendment would decrease the recently modified required
minimum on-site landscaping percentages for all commercial and industrial zones as
follows:
. Reduce the commercial development landscaping requirement from 20% to
15% of the project site.
. Reduce the industrial development landscaping requirement from 20% to 12%
of the project site.
BACKGROUND
The following table presents a timeline reflecting recent Planning Commission and
AGENDA He;; NO.
PI"";: I
I"lV...._
'+
(IF .)'3
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
May 1,2007
PROJECT TITLE: TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 2007-02
City Council actions related to the landscape ordinance.
November 7,2006
Planning Commission recommends
approval of Text Amendment No. 2006-
02 (increase to landscape requirements) to
Ci Council.
City Council approves Text Amendment
No. 2006-02.
November 28, 2006
December 12, 2006
City Council second reading of Text
Amendment No. 2006-02.
January 12, 2007
30-day adoption period ends. Revisions to
the landscape ordinance take effect.
As shown in the table above, the Planning Commission recommended City Council
approval of Text Amendment Number 2006-02, which was subsequently approved by
the City Council and adopted by ordinance, therefore modifying existing landscape
standards. This approval did the following:
. Increased the on-site landscape requirement for commercial development from
10% to 20% and industrial development from 8% to 20%.
. Increased the requirement for the number and size of trees within parking areas
from one (1) fifteen (15) gallon tree per every ten (10) parking spaces to one (1)
24-inch tree for every five (5) parking spaces.
It should be noted that this Text Amendment pertains to landscape percentages only
and the above listed (second bullet) tree to parking space ratio will not be modified.
Staff recommended increases to landscaping provisions primarily to bring the City of
Lake Elsinore landscape requirements in line with those found in neighboring
communities. Also, the Text Amendment was presented in order to improve the
aesthetic quality of future commercial and industrial developments by providing
AGENDA ITEM g _
PAGEJ--OF ~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
May 1, 2007
PROJECT TITLE: TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 2007-02
additional landscaping along street frontages and parking areas.
Outreach
Prior to and during the preparation of the initial Text Amendment (2006-02), staff
made efforts to advise commercial/industrial development applicants in the review
process (as well as prospective applicants) ofthe proposed increases to the landscaping
requirements. Many applicants in the review process modified their plans accordingly
in order to meet the new requirements prior to the official code change. These include
the following recently approved projects:
. Rite Aid pharmacy and Shopping Center (Lakeshore/Machado):
20% landscaping provided
. Diamond Professional Plaza Medical Offices (Diamond Drive):
27% landscaping provided
. McDonald's (Oak Grove/Target Shopping Center):
23 % landscaping provided
. Southern California Primary Medical Building (Canyon Estates Drive- adjacent
to Washington Mutual):
21 % landscaping provided
. Omni West Medical Building (Canyon Estates Drive)
33% landscaping provided
After the ordinance was adopted, it became evident to staff that not all project
applicants were aware or fully understood the level of change relative to the adoption
of the Text Amendment to the LEMC. On January 24, 2007, staff coordinated a
meeting with several members of the development community (including applicants
with submitted project applications) in order to explain and discuss the new
landscaping requirements. Those in attendance included developers, architects, and
commercial/industrial property owners.
A key issue of the discussion was the impact that the increased landscaping
requirements would have on maximizing building square footage on properties as well
AGENDA ITEM ~
PAGE?L OF r'3
'-
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
May 1, 2007
PROJECT TITLE: TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 2007-02
as comments relating to there being no financial benefit of having increased
landscaping incorporated into commercial and industrial developments. Staff informed
those in attendance that even though requirements were increased, the landscaping
ordinance provided relief to developers who sought reductions in landscaping.
Decreasing landscaping percentages for development projects was possible based on
the following language currently found in the landscape ordinance for all commercial
and industrial zones:
"A reduction in (landscape) coverage may be sought and approved during the Design
Review process in recognition of quality design. For the purpose of this provision,
quality considerations include the use of courtyards, atriums, creative use of ground
floor public space, creative use of water elements, and the incorporation of sculpture
or art work in the landscape proposal. "
In spite of the landscape ordinance provision listed above, those in attendance
indicated that over time, possible Planning staff attrition and future interpretation ofthe
stated guideline did not give them assurances that there would be flexibility in reducing
landscaping requirements if certain aesthetic and design goals were reached.
Based on the discussion and comments received at this meeting, the general consensus
was that the landscaping requirement be reduced from 20% to 15 % for commercial
development and from 20% to 12% for industrial developments.
In addition to the State mandated public notice and newspaper publishing, staff e-
mailed all ofthose in attendance at the January 24,2007 meeting advising them ofthis
new Text Amendment proposal.
ANALYSIS
On-Site landscaping
It is generally recognized that commercial and industrial developments with sufficient
landscaping provide many positive attributes to the areas, which include:
. Enhancing property aesthetics and overall community image.
. Beautifying streetscapes and public rights-of-way.
AGENDil I;rEM ~
PAGE.~ OF -4 '3
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
May 1, 2007
PROJECT TITLE: TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 2007-02
· Preserving a sense of place through the potential enhancement of commercial
and industrial district's appearance from public streets and between
incompatible uses.
· Improving air quality through the preservation of mature vegetation that remove
carbon monoxide and filter dust and particulates from the air.
· Assisting in climate modification and reducing energy costs through the use of
adequate landscaping to shade buildings, streets, sidewalks, and other outdoor
areas.
· Stabilizing soils by minimizing soil erosion.
Minimum On-site Landscaping Percentage Requirements in Other Cities
Communities employ an array of percentages for the requirement of on-site
landscaping requirements for commercial and industrial districts. The following matrix
reflects the minimum on-site landscaping requirements for various communities
throughout the County of Riverside.
Temecula
21%
23%
Murrieta
17%
10%
Perris
10%
10%
Moreno
Valley
nla
nla
The percentages listed represent an average of
the various commercial and industrial districts.
It should be noted that no commercial or
industrial zoning district was below twenty-
percent (20%).
The percentages listed represent an average of
all the various commercial and industrial
districts and does not include any commercial
and industrial specific plan landscape
re uirements.
No comment
The City of Moreno Valley does not have a
minimum landscape percentage requirement.
The City requires all setbacks exclusive of
required walkways and driveways will be
landsca ed lantin areas.
AGENDA ~M ~
PAGE -'- OF -J.~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
May 1, 2007
PROJECT TITLE: TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 2007-02
Hemet n/a n/a The City of Hemet does not have a minimum
landscape percentage requirement. The City
requires that all setbacks be landscaped.
Ontario 14% 12.5% The percentages listed represent an average of
all different commercial and industrial
districts. It should be noted that the
percentages differ whether it the lot in
question is a comer or interior lot.
More than half of all cities surveyed have a minimum percentage of the site devoted to
landscaping. It should be noted however, that like Lake Elsinore, some of the cities
listed above have specific plan areas and zone overlays incorporated into their zoning
and General Plan Maps, where provisions for more or less than minimum on-site
landscape percentage requirements could theoretically be found.
Lake Elsinore currently requires minimum on-site landscape percentage requirements
of twenty-percent (20%) for development in commercial and industrial districts. This
percentage is on the higher end of the spectrum when compared to the other cities
surveyed, with Temecula being the only City requiring more landscaping. If this Text
Amendment is approved, thereby reducing landscaping percentages for Lake Elsinore
to the proposed 15% for commercial and 12% for industrial, it would place the City
among the middle of the range compared to other nearby communities in terms of
required landscaping ratios.
It should be noted that the table above lists the average of on-site landscape percentage
requirements for all the different commercial and industrial districts within the
surveyed cities. Staffs analysis of the numbers provided was achieved by adding up all
the requirements within each district and calculating an overall average for the
commercial and industrial districts. In addition, staff concluded that some cities require
varying amounts oflandscaping for different parcel locations. For example, the City of
Ontario requires a lower percentage of on-site landscaping for interior lots and a higher
percentage for comer lots.
Minimum On-site Landscaping Percentage Requirements Conclusion
As shown, communities have taken a variety of approaches in their use of on-site
landscaping for commercial and industrial zoning districts. Whereas other cities have
elected to allow varying amounts of on-site landscaping, all provide this critical
AGEND~ ITEM Lf
PAGE ~ OF =:Y)
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
May 1, 2007
PROJECT TITLE: TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 2007-02
element as a means of enhancing property values and beautifying streetscapes, as well
as buffering commercial and industrial districts from public spaces and other uses. The
benefits and disadvantages of on-site landscaping are summarized below:
Benefits
· Enhanced aesthetics and community image.
· Beautifies streets capes and public right-of-ways
· Improves air-quality and reduces energy consumption.
· Stabilizes soils by minimizing soil erosion
Disadvantages
· Reduces buildable footprint area for projects.
· Requires additional maintenance by the property owner or management
company.
As reflected in the proposed "Draft" ordinance (Attachment 2), it is staffs
recommendation that the minimum on-site landscaping requirements be decreased
from twenty-percent (20%) to fifteen-percent (15%) in all commercial zoning districts.
Additionally, staff recommends that the on-site landscaping requirements be decreased
from twenty-percent (20%) to twelve-percent (12%) in all industrial zoning districts.
The landscaping ratios listed above will become the mandated guideline if this Text
Amendment is adopted, however it should be noted that: 1) more landscaping can be
requested for prominent parcels and/or developments during the design review process
and 2) less than the required landscaping can be incorporated into developments when
certain design features are included in the project.
SUMMARY
To summarize, the proposed landscape-related changes to the commercial and
industrial zoning districts are as follows:
· Decrease the amount of required on-site landscape coverage from twenty-
percent (20%) to fifteen-percent (15%) in all commercial districts.
. Decrease the amount of on-site landscape coverage from twenty-percent (20%)
to twelve-percent (12%) in all industrial districts.
AGENDA ITEM 4
PAGEfOF3)
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
May 1, 2007
PROJECT TITLE: TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 2007-02
The proposed code changes and additional text are reflected in the attached "Draft
Ordinance Revisions" (Attachment 2).
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study was
completed to analyze the potential environmental impacts ofthe proposed project. The
Initial Study concluded that the proposed project would have no significant
environmental impacts. A Negative Declaration has accordingly been prepared and
released for review. The review period commenced on April 17, 2007 and ends on
May 18, 2007.
FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed Text Amendment would make minor changes to existing on-site
landscape requirements within all commercial and industrial districts. The changes
would not affect the overall scope or complexity of the standards and as such would
not require any additional staff time or resources to administer. There would be
minimal fiscal impact to the City resulting from administration or enforcement of the
proposed ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt; Resolution No. 2007-_,
recommending City Council approval of Text Amendment No. 2007-02 in order to
amend portions ofLEMC Chapter 17.40 (C-O Commercial Office District), Chapter
17.44 (C-l Neighborhood Commercial District), Chapter 17.48 (C-2 General
Commercial District), Chapter 17.52 (C-P Commercial Park District), Chapter 17.54
(C-M Commercial Manufacturing District), Chapter 17.56 (M-l Limited
Manufacturing District), and Chapter 17.60 (General Manufacturing District) related to
modifying the minimum on-site landscape percentage requirements.
AGENDAJ,TEM 4
PAGE~OF~~
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
May 1,2007
PROJECT TITLE: TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 2007-02
PREPARED BY:
TOM WEINER, PLANNING MANAGER
APPROVED BY:
ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ATTACHMENTS:
1. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
2. "DRAFT" ORDINANCE REVISIONS
3. NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND INITIAL STUDY
AGENDA ITEM LI
PAGE~OF~3
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE
ELSINORE APPROVAL OF ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT
AMENDMENT NO. 2007-02 AND THE ADOPTION OF THE
NEGATIVE DECLARATION THEREFOR
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Lake
Elsinore has filed an application requesting that Chapter 17.40 (C-O Commercial
Office District), Chapter 17.44 (C-l Neighborhood Commercial District), Chapter
17.48 (C-2 General Commercial District), Chapter 17.52 (C-P Commercial Park
District), Chapter 17.54 (C-M Commercial Manufacturing District), Chapter
17.56 (M-l Limited Manufacturing District), and Chapter 17.60 (M-2 General
Manufacturing District) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code be amended (the
"Amendment"); and
WHEREAS, the Amendment modifies the minimum required percentage
of on-site landscape coverage within commercial and industrial zones; and
WHEREAS, pursuant Section 17.84.050 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code, the Planning Commission is delegated with the responsibility of
examining, considering, and making a recommendation to the City Council
regarding proposed amendments to Title 17; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore (the "City") has prepared a
negative declaration (the "Negative Declaration") on the proposed Text
Amendment (the "Project") pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq.: "CEQA"), the Guidelines for
Implementation of CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations, Section 15000, et
seq.: the "State CEQA Guidelines"), and procedures adopted by the City relating
to environmental evaluation of public and private projects; and
WHEREAS, notice to all interested persons and agencies inviting
comments on the Negative Declaration was published in accordance with the
provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Text Amendment has been given, and the
Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with
respect to this item on May 1, 2007.
N:;::NDA liEi'll NO. Lf
PAGE l 0 OFS-3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-
PAGE20F4
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Text
Amendment prior to recommending that the City Council approve the changes.
SECTION 2. The Planning Commission has evaluated all comments,
written and oral, received from persons who have reviewed the Negative
Declaration.
SECTION 3. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the
Negative Declaration prepared by the City staff for the Project and finds that it is
adequate. The Negative Declaration satisfies the requirements of CEQA and is
hereby approved. Based on the Negative Declaration, the comments received
thereon, the responses to those comments, and the evidence and testimony before
it, the Planning Commission finds that the Negative Declaration reflects the
independent judgment of the City, and that there is no substantial evidence before
the Planning Commission that the Project may have a significant effect on the
environment.
SECTION 4. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law and
the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following
findings for the recommendation of approval of Text Amendment No. 2007-02:
1. The Text Amendment will not be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort,
or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the
neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City.
The proposed Text Amendment to the City's Municipal Code will contribute
to the comfort and general welfare of the persons working and/or residing
within the City. The proposed revisions reduce the City's minimum on-site
landscape percentage requirements within commercial and industrial zones.
These revisions increase the viability of commercial and industrial
development while maintaining a fair level of landscaping and will maintain
the overall visual character and quality of the City.
AGfND,c\ ITeM NO. 4
PAGE (( OF S 3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-
PAGE30F4
2. The Text Amendment will not be injurious to property or improvements
wi thin the City.
The proposed Text Amendment will not be injurious to property or
improvements within the City as the proposed revisions and modifications
are an overall beneficial enhancement to development in the City. The
proposed Amendments apply only to new development.
3. The proposed Text Amendment is consistent with the General Plan.
The proposed Text Amendment is consistent with the General Plan,
Community Design Element, and serves as an important link between the
City's built environment and the natural environment. The new ratios for
required landscaping will continue to provide visual relief, cleaner air, and
screens or buffers. Well-planned and maintained landscaping serves to
increase property value and increase the aesthetic value to the community.
The landscaping percentages are consistent with those found in surrounding
communities.
SECTION 5. Based upon the evidence presented, both oral and written, and
the above findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City
Council approve Text Amendment No. 2007-02.
SECTION 6. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this I st day of May, 2007, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
Michael O'Neal, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore
AGHm;1 nEM NO.
PAGE I~
4
OF 5-~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-
PAGE40F4
ATTEST:
Rolfe Preisendanz
Director of Community Development
t'.GErm,:\ n::r;i NO.
PAGE 13 OF
If
,~3
ATTACHMENT 2
"DRAFT ORDINANCE REVISIONS"
Minimum On-site Landscape Coverage Requirements for Commercial and
Industrial Districts (Revise Existinf! Code)
Chapter 17.40.080(c)
C. Generally: All building sites shall have a minimum landscaped coverage
equivalent to t\yenty (20%) fifteen (15%) percent of the total lot area. Such
landscaping shall be evenly distributed over the site and consist of an
effective combination of trees, ground cover, and shrubbery, which may
include landscaping required for setbacks or buffers. A reduction in
coverage may be sought and approved during the Design Review process in
recognition of quality design. For the purpose of this provision, quality
considerations include the use of courtyards, atriums, creative use of ground
floor public space, creative use of water elements, and the incorporation of
sculpture or art work in the landscape proposal.
Chapter 17.44.070(c)
C. Generally: All building sites shall have a minimum landscaped coverage
equivalent to t\venty (20%) fifteen (15%) percent of the total lot area. Such
landscaping shall be evenly distributed over the site and consist of an
effective combination of trees, ground cover, and shrubbery, which may
include landscaping required for setbacks or buffers. A reduction in
coverage may be sought and approved during the Design Review process in
recognition of quality design. For the purpose of this provision, quality
considerations include the use of courtyards, atriums, creative use of ground
floor public space, creative use of water elements, and the incorporation of
sculpture or art work in the landscape proposal.
AGcNDF~
'\\0 4
h .
\YOf ,\3
PAGE
Chapter l7.48.080(c)
C. Generally: All building sites shall have a minimum landscaped coverage
equivalent to twenty (20%) fifteen (15%) percent of the total lot area. Such
landscaping shall be evenly distributed over the site and consist of an
effective combination of trees, ground cover, and shrubbery, which may
include landscaping required for setbacks or buffers. A reduction in
coverage may be sought and approved during the Design Review process in
recognition of quality design. For the purpose of this provision, quality
considerations include the use of courtyards, atriums, creative use of ground
floor public space, creative use of water elements, and the incorporation of
sculpture or art work in the landscape proposal.
Chapter l7.52.080(c)
C. Generally: All building sites shall have a minimum landscaped coverage
equivalent to tv;enty (20%) fifteen (15%) percent of the total lot area. Such
landscaping shall be evenly distributed over the site and consist of an
effective combination of trees, ground cover, and shrubbery, which may
include landscaping required for setbacks or buffers. A reduction in
coverage may be sought and approved during the Design Review process in
recognition of quality design. For the purpose of this provision, quality
considerations include the use of courtyards, atriums, creative use of ground
floor public space, creative use of water elements, and the incorporation of
sculpture or art work in the landscape proposal.
Chapter l7.54.090(c)
C. Generally: All building sites shall have a minimum landscaped coverage
equivalent to twenty (20%) twelve (12%) percent of the total lot area. Such
landscaping shall be evenly distributed over the site and tmd consist of an
effective combination of trees, ground cover, and shrubbery, which may
include landscaping required for setbacks or buffers. A reduction in
coverage may be sought and approved during the Design Review process in
recognition of quality design. For the purposes of this provision, quality
considerations include the use of courtyards, atriums, creative use of ground
floor public space, creative use of water elements, and the incorporation of
sculpture or artwork in the landscaped proposal.
AGENDA rn:r.l I'm. 4
PAGE {S- OF S-3 ~
Chapter l7.56.100(c)
C. Generally: All building sites shall have a minimum landscaped coverage
equivalent to twenty (20%) twelve (12%) percent of the total lot area. Such
landscaping shall be evenly distributed over the site and consist of an
effective combination of trees, ground cover, and shrubbery, which may
include landscaping required for setbacks or buffers. A reduction in
coverage may be sought and approved during the Design Review process in
recognition of quality design. For the purpose of this provision, quality
considerations include the use of courtyards, atriums, creative use of ground
floor public space, creative use of water elements, and the incorporation of
sculpture or art work in the landscape proposal.
Chapter l7.60.100(c)
C. Generally: All building sites shall have a minimum landscaped coverage
equivalent to twenty (20%) twelve (12%) percent of the total lot area. Such
landscaping shall be evenly distributed over the site and consist of an
effective combination of trees, ground cover, and shrubbery, which may
include landscaping required for setbacks or buffers. A reduction in
coverage may be sought and approved during the Design Review process in
recognition of quality design. For the purpose of this provision, quality
considerations include the use of courtyards, atriums, creative use of ground
floor public space, creative use of water elements, and the incorporation of
sculpture or art work in the landscape proposal.
-End Draft Ordinance Revisions-
ACEND;'\ nG:1 NO.
PACE_ I ~
4
Of
,\3
CITY OF ~
LAKE ,6,LSiNORJ;
~ DREAM EXTREME..
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
(951) 674-3124 Voice (951) 471-1419 Fax
INITIAL STUDY
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
Introduction
This Initial Study has been prepared in accordance with relevant provlSlons of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the CEQA Guidelines. Section 15063(c)
ofthe CEQA Guidelines indicates that the purposes of an Initial Study are to:
1. Provide the Lead Agency (i.e., the City of Lake Elsinore) with information to use as the basis for
deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or Negative Declaration;
2. Enable an applicant or Lead Agency to modify a project, mitigating adverse impacts before an EIR
is prepared, thereby enabling the project to quality for a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative
Declaration ;
3. Assist the preparation of an EIR, if one is required, by:
· Focusing the EIR on the effects determined to be significant;
· Identifying the effects determined not to be significant;
· Explaining the reasons why potentially significant effects would not be significant;
and
· Identifying whether a program EIR, tiering, or another appropriate process can be
used for analysis of the project's environmental effects;
4. Facilitate environmental assessment early in the design of a project;
5. Provide documentation of the factual basis for the findings in a Negative Declaration or Mitigated
Negative Declaration that a project will not have a significant effect on the environment;
6. Eliminate unnecessary EIRs; and
7. Determine whether a previously prepared EIR could be used with the project.
PACE
MJ. 4
1"( OF )6
1
AGfNDP\
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. Proiect Title:
Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2007-02
2. Lead Al!encv Name and Address:
City of Lake Elsinore
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, California 92530
3. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Tom Weiner, Planning Manager
(951) 674-3124
4. Proiect Location:
Citywide in all Commercial and Industrial Zones
5. Proiect Applicant Name and Address:
City of Lake Elsinore
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
6. General Plan Desil!nation(s):
Mixed Use, Neighborhood Commercial, Tourist Commercial, General Commercial, Commercial
Office, Freeway Business, Limited Industrial, and Business Park.
7. Zoninl!:
C-O (Commercial Office District), C-l (Neighborhood Commercial District), C-2 (General
Commercial District), C-P (Commercial Park District), C-M (Commercial Manufacturing
District), M-l (Limited Manufacturing District), and M-2 (General Manufacturing District).
8. Description of Proiect:
To amend portions of the following Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapters in order to modify
the minimum on-site landscape coverage percentage requirements within commercial and
industrial zones:
Chapter 17.40 (C-O Commercial Office District), 17.44 (C-l Neighborhood Commercial
District), Chapter 17.48 (C-2 General Commercial District), Chapter 17.52 (C-P Commercial Park
District), Chapter 17.54 (C-M Commercial Manufacturing District), Chapter 17.56 (M-l Limited
Manufacturing District), and Chapter 17.60 (M-2 General Manufacturing District).
9. Surroundinl! Land Uses and Settinl!:
Varies by location as Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02 applies Citywide to all
properties in Commercial and Industrial zones.
2
AGENDA na.Jj NO.~
PAGE_ l ~_OF. 5 :3
\.,
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
10. Other ae:encies whose approval is required (e.e:., permits, financine: approval, or
participatine: ae:reement):
None.
3
.ACfND/\ iT;2;','[ i'~O.
4
5~6
PAGi: 11 OF
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May I, 2007
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
o Aesthetics 0 Agricultural Resources 0 Air Quality
o Biological Resources 0 Cultural Resources 0 Geology/Soils
o Hazards & Hazardous Materials 0 Hydrology/Water Quality 0 Land Use/Planning
o Mineral Resources 0 Noise 0 Population/Housing
o Public Services 0 Recreation 0 Transportation/Traffic
o Utilities/Service Systems 0 Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
[gI I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
o I find that although the project could have a significant effect on the environment there will not be a
significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made or agreed to by the
project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
o I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
o I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially
significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect I) has been
adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been
addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
o I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because
all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Signature
May 1, 2007
Date
Tom Weiner
Print Name
Planning Manager, City of Lake Elsinore
Title
4
AGEf\lDr\
~~o.
Lf
PP.GE ~O OF
n
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EV ALVA TION CHECKLIST
I. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the
impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault
rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors
as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a
project-specific screening analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site,
cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational
impacts.
3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist
answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation,
or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence
that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when
the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a
"Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly
explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from "Earlier
Analyses," cited in support of conclusions reached in other sections may be cross-referenced).
5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an
effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D).
In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a. Earlier Analysis Used-Identify and state where they are available for review.
b. Impacts Adequately Addressed-Identify which effects from the above checklist were
within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable
legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based
on the earlier analysis.
c. Mitigation Measures-For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from
the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the
project.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for
potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside
document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is
substantiated.
7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals
contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8. The explanation of each issue should identity: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to
evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less
than significance.
5
ACENDj~ nd;l NO.
PAGE d--\
4
S3
OF
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May I, 2007
A. AESTHETICS
Would the project:
1. Have a substantial
vista?
adverse effect on a scemc
2. Substantially damage scenic resources, including,
but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and
historic buildings within a state scenic highway?)
3. Substantially degrade the eXistIng visual
character or quality of the site and its
surroundings?)
4. Create a source of substantial light or glare,
which would adversely affect day or nighttime
views in the area?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
D
D
D
D
Less than
Significant No Impact
Impact
D ~
D
~
D
~
D
~
B. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES*
Would the project:
5. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,
or Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared
pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use?
6. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural
use, or a Williamson Act contract?
7. Involve other changes In the existing
environment, which, due to their location or
nature, could result In converSIOn of
Farmland, to nonagricultural use?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
D
D
D
Less than
Significant No Impact
Impact
D ~
D ~
D ~
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects. lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of
Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agricultural and farmland.
*
6
AG t: f~ ::.~;~
NO. Lf
door OF J"3
Pl\GE
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
C. AIR QUALITY*
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
D
D
D
D
D
Less than
Significant No Impact
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
[gJ
[gJ
[gJ
[gJ
[gJ
D. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Would the proj ect:
8. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
9. Violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air
quality violation?
10. Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
11. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?)
12. Create objectionable odors affecting a
substantial number of people?)
* Where available, the significant criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district
may be relied upon to make the following determinations.
Would the project:
13. Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any speCIes identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by
the California Department of Fish and Game
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
14. Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
7
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
D
D
Less than
Significant No Impact
Impact
D [gJ
D [gJ
PhGE d:- 3 OF
4
J--3
"';.V"i'~~t~:Y'~(. a'~ ",..J f~O.
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
D. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less than
Significant No Impact
Impact
Would the project:
15. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (including, but not
limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
16. Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
17. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree D
preservation policy or ordinance?
18. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other D
approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
D
D
D ~
D
D
D ~
D
D
~
D
D
~
E. CULTURAL RESOURCES Potentially Less Than Less than
Significant Significant Significant No Impact
With
Would the proj ect: Impact Mitigation Impact
19. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as defined D D D ~
in ~ 15064.5?
20. Cause a substantial adverse change in the [8J
significance of an archaeological resource D D D
pursuant to ~15064.5?
21. Directly or indirectl y destroy a umque
paleontological resource or site or umque D D D ~
geological feature?
22. Disturb any human remains, including those D D D ~
interred outside of formal cemeteries?
8
AGENDt\ lTEfll im.
PAGE ;;>- ~ OF
Lf
-3
)
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1,2007
F. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Would the project:
23. Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk
of loss, injury, or death involving:
a. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special Pub. 42.
b. Strong seismic ground shaking?
c. Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
d. Landslides?
24. Result in substantial soil erosion, or the loss of
topsoil?
25. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project, and potentially result in
on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse
26. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table l8-l-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial risks to life or
property?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
27. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or alternative waste
water disposal system where sewers are not D
available for the disposal of waste water?
9
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Less than
Significant No Impact
Impact
D ~
D ~
D ~
D ~
D ~
D ~
D ~
D
~
ACl:NDA ITa.Jl No.3
Pt'.GE .>-s r OF ~... 3
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1,2007
G. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS
Would the project:
28. Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use
or disposal of hazardous materials?
29. Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable
up-set and accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
30. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous
or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter mile of an existing
or proposed school?
31. Be located on a site which is included on a list
of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
32. For a project located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project result
in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
33 For a project within the vicinity of a private
airstrip, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the
project area?
34. Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
35. Expose people or structures to a significant
risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland
fires, including where wildlands are adjacent
to urbanized areas or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
10
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Less than
Significant No Impact
Impact
D
~
D
~
D
~
D
~
D
~
D
~
D
~
D
~
Lf
AGf:ND,~ iTi.:M NO.
PAGE d-fb OF S"3
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
H. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Would the project:
36. Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements?
37. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that there would be a net deficit
in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (e.g., the production
rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to
a level which would not support existing land
uses or planned uses for which permits have
been granted)?
38. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern
of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, or
substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result
in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
39. Create or contribute runoff water, which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm
water drainage systems or provide substantial
additional sources of polluted runoff?
40. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
41. Place housing within a lOa-year flood hazard
area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard D
Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other
flood hazard delineation map?
42. Place within a lOa-year flood hazard area
structures which would impede or redirect flood D
flows?
43. Expose people or structures to a significant risk
of loss, injury or death involving flooding, D
including flooding as a result of the failure of a
levee or dam?
44. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? D
11
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Less than
Significant No Impact
Impact
D ~
D ~
D ~
D ~
D ~
D
~
D
~
D
~
D
~
AG1:i~ r~' i~'~1 i~O~
y
S3
P,c/JE d--"l OF
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1,2007
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
D
Less than
Significant No Impact
Impact
Would the project:
45. Physically divide an established community?
46. Conflict with any applicable land use plan,
policy, or regulation of an agency with
jurisdiction over the project (including, but not
limited to the general plan, specific plan, local
coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
47. Conflict with any applicable habitat
conservation plan or natural community
conservation plan?
D
D ~
D
D
D ~
D
D
D ~
J. MINERAL RESOURCES Potentially Less Than Less than
Significant Significant Significant No Impact
Would the project: Impact With Impact
Mitigation
48. Result in the loss of availability of a known D D D ~
mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the state?
49. Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site D D D ~
delineated on a local general plan, specific plan
or other land use plan?
Would the project result in:
50. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise
levels in excess of standards established in the
local general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other agencies?
51. Exposure of persons to or generation of
excessive groundborne vibration or D
groundborne noise levels?
Potentially Less Than Less than
Significant
Significant With Significant No Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
D D D ~
K. NOISE
D
D
[g]
12
AGHWA n(.,l j>jO. \.j
PACE d---<<2> OF J 3
\
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
K. NOISE Potentially Less Than Less than
Significant
Would the project result in: Significant With Significant No Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
52. A substantial permanent increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels D D D ~
existing without the project?
53. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in D D D ~
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels without the project?
54. For a project located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public D D D ~
use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the proj ect area to
excessive noise levels?
55. For a project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip, would the project expose people D D D ~
residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
L. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less than
Significant No Impact
Impact
Would the project:
56. Induce substantial population growth in an area,
either directly (for example, by proposing new
homes and businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through an extension of roads or other
infra-structure)?
57. Displace substantial numbers of existing
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
58. Displace substantial numbers of people,
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
D
D
D ~
D
D
D ~
D
D
D ~
13
ACENDA nCid i~O..
PAGE :;)..q
4
OF ,\~
'~
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
M. PUBLIC SERVICES*
Potentially Less Than Less than
Significant
Would the project result in substantial adverse Significant With Significant No Impact
physical impacts to the following: Impact Mitigation Impact
59. Fire protection? D D D ~
60. Police protection? D D D ~
61. Schools? D D D ~
62. Parks? D D D ~
63. Other public facilities? D D D ~
'"
Include potential effects associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services.
N.
RECREATION
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less than
Significant No Impact
Impact
64. Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would
occur or be accelerated?
65. Does the project include recreational facilities
or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities, which might have an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
D
D
D
~
D
D
D
~
O. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less than
Significant No Impact
Impact
Would the project:
66. Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial
in relation to the existing traffic load and
capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a
substantial increase in either the number of
vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on
roads, or congestion at intersections)?
D
D
D ~
14
I-IV~'r,...,"" ~... ..J. If
PAGE ':3 0 OF . r3
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
O. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC
Would the project:
67. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a
level of service standard established by the
County congestion management agency for
designated roads or highways?
68. Result in a change in traffic patterns, including
either an increase in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial safety risks?
69. Substantially increase hazards due to a design
feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
70. Result in inadequate emergency access?
71. Result in inadequate parking capacity?
72. Conflict with adopted policies, plans or
programs supporting alternative transportation
(e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
D
D
D
D
D
D
Less than
Significant No Impact
Impact
D ~
D ~
D ~
D ~
D ~
D ~
P. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project:
73. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of
the applicable Regional Water Quality Control
Board?
74. Require or result in the construction of new
water or wastewater treatment facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the construction
of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
75. Require or result in the construction of new
storm water drainage facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental effects?
76. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve
the project from existing entitlements and
resources, or are new or expanded entitlements
needed?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
15
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
D
D
D
D
Less than
Significant No Impact
Impact
D ~
D ~
D ~
D ~
AGENDA ITHfi NO.
PACE j I OF
'+
S-1
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May I, 2007
P. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Less Than
Potentially Significant Less than
Significant With Significant No Impact
Would the project: Impact Mitigation Impact
77. Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider, which serves or may serve D D D ~
the project that it has adequate capacity to serve
the project's projected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
78. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted D D D ~
capacity to accommodate the project's solid
waste disposal needs?
79. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes D D D ~
and regulations related to solid waste?
Q. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE
80. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
81. Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)?
82. Does the project have environmental effects,
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less than
Significant No Impact
Impact
D
~
D
D
D
~
D
D
D
D
~
D
-End of Environmental Impact Evaluation Checklist -
16
AGENDA ITEM i'lO. l{.
PAGE ?>::r OF ,r- d
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION DISCUSSION
The following is a discussion of the potential impacts associated with the approval of the proposed
project, as identified in the above Environmental Impact Evaluation Checklist. Explanations are
provided for each item below.
A. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
1) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
No Impact: The project proposes an amendment to the City's minimum on-site landscape
percentage requirements within commercial and industrial zones. Therefore, the project will
have no impact to any scenic resources
Mitigation Measures: None.
2) Substantiallv damage scenic resources, includinJ!. but not limited to, trees, rock outcrovvings,
and historic buildinJ!s within a state scenic hiJ!hwav?
No Impact: The project proposes an amendment to the City's minimum on-site landscape
percentage requirements within commercial and industrial zones. Therefore, the project will
have no impact to any scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings
and historic buildings within a scenic highway.
Mitigation Measures: None.
3) Substantiallv deJ!rade the existinJ! visual character or qualitv of the site and its surroundings?
No Impact: The proposed text amendment involves no physical development and is limited to
modifying the minimum on-site percentage landscape requirements within commercial and
industrial zones. Therefore, the project will not substantially degrade the existing visual
character or quality of a site and its surroundings, and the project will have no impacts.
Mitigation Measures: None.
4) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adverselv affect dav or nighttime
views in the area?
No Impact: Please refer to A-3 above.
17
AGEND;\ 112M lilO.
\f
PAGE ~3 OF \:~
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May I, 2007
Mitigation Measures: None.
B. AGRICUL TURAL RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural
resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California
Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the
California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on
agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
5) Convert Prime Farmland. UniQue Farmland. or Farmland of Statewide Imvortance (Farmland).
as shown on the mavs prevared pursuant to the Farmland Mavvinf! and Monitoring Prof!ram of
the California Resources Af!encv. to non-agricultural use?
No Impact: The project proposes an amendment to portions of the City's minimum on-site
landscape percentage requirements within commercial and industrial zones. Therefore, no
relationship exists between the project and the conversion of farmland to urban uses.
Mitigation Measures: None.
6) Conflict with existing zoninf! for af!ricultural use. or a Williamson Act contract?
No Impact: Refer to response to B-5 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
7) Involve other chanf!es in the existinf! environment. which due to their location or nature. could
result in the conversion of Farmland. to non-af!ricultural use?
No Impact: Refer to response B-5 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
C. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air
quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following
determinations. Would the project:
8) Conflict with or obstruct imvlementation of the avvlicable air Quality vlan?
No Impact. The project proposes an amendment to portions of the City's minimum on-site
landscape percentage requirements within commercial and industrial zones. The project would
not change existing land uses contained in the City's General Plan or have any direct impacts on
local air quality.
18
ACHmJ\, NO.
PACE d- '1
4
OF Sa
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
Mitigation Measures: None.
9) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existinJ! or vroiected air
Quality violation?
No Impact: Refer to response C-8 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
10) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the vroiect
region is non-attainment under an avvlicable federal or state ambient air Quality standard
(including releasinJ! emissions which exceed Quantitative thresholds for ozone vrecursors)?
No Impact: Refer to response C-8 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
11) Exvose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
No Impact: Refer to response C-8 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
12) Create obiectionable odors affectinJ! a substantial number of veovle?
No Impact: Refer to response C-8 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
D. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
13) Have a substantial adverse effect. either directly or through habitat modifications. on any
svecies identified as a candidate. sensitive. or svecial status svecies in local or reJ!ional plans.
volicies. or reJ!ulations. or bv the California Devartment of Fish and Game or u.s. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
No Impact: The proposed project is a regulatory change to sections of the City's minimum on-
site landscape percentage requirements within commercial and industrial zones. Therefore, the
project will have no impact on any property, nor impact any sensitive plant or animal habitat.
Likewise, there will be no conflict between the project and any adopted city, county, regional,
19
AGENDA iTEM NO. 4-
PAGE '3~OF , )~
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
state or federal policy, goal, or plan pertaining to the preservation and/or conservation of
biological resources in the City of Lake Elsinore.
Mitigation Measures: None.
14) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or ref!ional plans. policies. ref!Ulations or by the California Department of
Fish and Game or Us. Fish and Wildlife Service?
No Impact: Refer to response D-13 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
15) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (includinf!. but not limited to. marsh. vernal pool. coastal. etc.) throuf!h
direct removal. fillinf!. hydrological interruption. or other means?
No Impact: Refer to response D-13 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
16) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
No Impact: Refer to response D-13 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
17) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policv or ordinance?
No Impact: Refer to response D-13 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
18) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. Natural Community
Conservation Plan. or other approved local. ref!ional. or state habitat conservation plan?
No Impact: Refer to response D-13 above.
20
ACENDt'\ iTEA I'm.
~
PAGE 3 G:> OF l \-,~
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
Mitigation Measures: None
E. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
19) Cause a substantial adverse chanf!e in the sif!nificance of a historical resource as defined in
CEOA Guidelines ~15064.5?
No Impact: The project proposes an amendment to portions of the City's minimum on-site
landscape percentage requirements within commercial and industrial zones. Additionally, this
project involves no physical land use changes within the City of Lake Elsinore. Therefore, the
project would have no impact on cultural resources.
Mitigation Measures: None.
20) Cause a substantial adverse chanf!e in the significance of an archaeolordcal resource pursuant
to CEOA Guidelines 915064.5?
No Impact: Refer to response E-19 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
21) Directlv or indirectlv destrov a uniQue oaleontolof!ical resource or site or uniQue f!eolof!ic
feature?
No Impact: Refer to response E-19 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
22) Disturb anv human remains. including those interred outside offormal cemeteries?
No Impact: Refer to response E-19 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
F. GEOLOGY AND SOILS.
Would the project:
21
AGcfM."::'/i. n;::.~j i'~O.
l{
PAGE 31 Of .)~
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May I, 2007
23) Exvose veovle or structures to votential substantial adverse effects. includinf! the risk of loss.
in;urv. or death involving:
a.) Ruvture of a known earthquake fault. as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoninf! Mav issued bv the State Geolof!ist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geolof!V Svecial
Publication 42.
No Impact: The proposed amendment would make minor adjustments to the City's existing
minimum landscape percentage requirements within commercial and industrial zones. There
are no associated physical changes in land use proposed at this time that would cause impacts
related to geology and soils. Therefore, the proposed project would have no potential for
geology or soils related impacts.
Mitigation Measures: None.
b.) Stronf! seismic f!round shakinf!?
No Impact: Refer to response F-23 (a) above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
c.) Seismic-related ground failure. includinf! liquefaction?
No Impact: Refer to response F-23 (a) above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
d.) Landslides?
No Impact: Refer to response F-23 (a) above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
24) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss oftovsoil?
No Impact. Refer to response F-23 (a) above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
22
AGr:NDt~ ITEM fJO. 4
Pt,GE 3~ OF .(3
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May I, 2007
25) Be located on a fleoloflic unit or soil that is unstable. or would become unstable as a result of
the vroiect. and potentiallv result in on- or off-site landslide. lateral spreadinfl. subsidence.
liquefaction or collapse?
No Impact: Refer to responses F-23 (a).
Mitigation Measures: None.
26) Be located on exvansive soil. as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Buildinf! Code (J994).
creatinfl substantial risks to life or provertv?
No Impact: Refer to response F-23 (a) above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
27) Have soils incapable of adeQuatelv suvvortinf! the use of sevtic tanks or alternative waste water
disposal svstem where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?
No Impact: Refer to response F-23 (a) above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
G. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
28) Create a siflnificant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transvort. use.
or disposal of hazardous materials?
No Impact: The project proposes an amendment to portions of the City's minimum on-site
landscape percentage requirements within commercial and industrial zones and in no way
involves or affects the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Therefore, the
project would have no impacts.
Mitigation Measures: None.
29) Create a significant hazard to the vublic or the environment through reasonablv foreseeable
uvset and accident conditions involvinf! the release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
No Impact: Refer to response G-28 above.
23
ACENDA lTEM NO. If-
PAGE 3'1 OF S-;3
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
Mitigation Measures: None.
30) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutelv hazardous materials. substances. or
waste within one-Quarter mile of an existinJ! or proposed school?
No Impact: Refer to response G-28 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
31) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant
to Government Code Section 65962.5 and. as a result. would it create a siJ!nificant hazard to the
public or the environment?
No Impact: The project proposes an amendment to portions of the City's minimum on-site
landscape percentage requirements within commercial and industrial zones. Therefore, no
impacts would occur.
Mitigation Measures: None.
32) For a pro;ect located within an airport land use plan or. where such a plan has not been
adooted. within two miles of a public airport or public use airport. would the pro;ect result in a
safetv hazard for people residing or working in the pro;ect area?
No Impact: Refer to response G-31 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
33) For a pro;ect within the vicinitv of a private airstrip. would the pro;ect result in a safetv hazard
for people residing or working in the pro;ect area?
No Impact: Refer to response G-31 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
34) Impair implementation of or phvsicallv interfere with an adopted emerJ!encv response plan or
emergencv evacuation plan?
No Impact: Refer to response G-31 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
24
GP1\'D" ...,.."~ ~IO II
A t'l~ Jo\III:W,'. .~
PAGE yo OF J 3
~.
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
35) Exoose oeople or structures to a sif!nificant risk of loss. in;ury or death involving wildland fires.
includinf! where wildlands are ad;acent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed
with wildlands?
No Impact: Refer to response G-31 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
H. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
36) Violate anv water Quality standards or waste discharge reQuirements?
No Impact: The project proposes an amendment to portions of the City's minimum on-site
landscape percentage requirements within commercial and industrial zones. The proposed
adjustments would have no effect on hydrology or water quality in the City of Lake Elsinore.
Therefore, no impacts would occur.
Mitigation Measures: None.
37) Substantiallv deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantiallv with f!roundwater recharge
such that there would be a net deficit in aQuifer volume or a lowering of the local f!roundwater
table level (e.f!., the production rate of pre-existinf! nearbv wells would droo to a level which
would not suooort existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been f!ranted)?
No Impact: Refer to response H-36 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
38) Substantiallv alter the existinf! drainaf!e pattern of the site or area. including through the
alteration of the course of stream or river. or substantiallv increase the rate or amount of the
surface runoffin a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
No Impact: Refer to response H-36 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
39) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the caoacity of existinf! or olanned storm
water drainaf!e svstems or orovide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
25
ACfNDA ITEM NO.
Pn,r~ "-II
/'"iv_
4
OF )1
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May I, 2007
No Impact: Refer to response H-36 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
40) Otherwise substantiallv def!rade water qualitv?
No Impact: Refer to response H-36 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
41) Place housinf! within a 100-vear flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard
Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
No Impact: Refer to response H-36 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
42) Place within a 100-vear flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood
flows?
No Impact: Refer to response H-36 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
43) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss. in;urv or death involvinf! floodinf!.
includinf! floodinf! as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
No Impact: Refer to response H-36 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
44) Inundation bv seiche. tsunami. or mudflow?
No Impact: Refer to response H-36 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
26
ACHE/A IT.:::t',) NO. L.t
PAGE l..\..?- Or: 5:1
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May I, 2007
45) Physically divide an established community?
No Impact: The project proposes an amendment to portions of the City's minimum on-site
landscape percentage requirements within commercial and industrial zones. It does not involve
permanent or physical separation of the community. Therefore, the proposed text amendment
would have no associated impacts.
Mitigation Measures: None
46) Conflict with anv applicable land use plan. policv. or regulation of an aflencv with ;urisdiction
over the pro;ect {inc/udinfl, but not limited to the fleneral plan. specific plan. local coastal
program, or zoninfl ordinance} adopted for the purpose of avoidinfl or mitiflatinfl an
environmental affect?
No Impact: The project proposes an amendment to portions of the City's minimum on-site
landscape percentage requirements within commercial and industrial zones. Therefore the
proposed amendment would have no impact to any plan, policy or regulation adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental affect.
Mitigation Measures: None.
47) Conflict with anv applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation
plan?
No Impact: Refer to response D-13 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
J. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
48) Result in the loss of availabilitv of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the
reflion and the residents of the state?
No Impact: The project proposes an amendment to portions of the City's minimum on-site
landscape percentage requirements within commercial and industrial zones. Therefore, no
alternation or loss of a known mineral resource would occur.
Mitigation Measures: None.
27
AGEND:i\ iT[j','a NO.
P/J.CE_.Y 3
li-
OF )"3
~
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May I, 2007
49) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated
on a local general plan. specific plan or other land use plan?
No Impact: Refer to response J-48 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
K. NOISE. Would the project result in:
50) Exposure of versons to or J!eneration of noise levels in excess of standards established in the
local generalvlan or noise ordinance. or apvlicable standards of other aJ!encies?
No Impact: The proposed Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment will not expose persons to the
generation of excess noise levels, ground borne vibration, or increase ambient noise in the City
of Lake Elsinore. The amendment does not involve any development that would impact noise
levels in the City. The proposed amendment does not alter any noise-related regulations found
in the Municipal Code or General Plan and would not lead to a change in the generation of
noise. Therefore, no impact to noise levels would occur.
Mitigation Measures: None.
51) Exvosure ofversons to or J!eneration of excessive groundborne vibration or J!roundborne noise
levels?
No Impact: Refer to response H-50
Mitigation Measures: None.
52) A substantialvermanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vro;ect vicinitv above levels
existing without the project?
No Impact: Refer to response H-50 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
53) A substantial temvorarv or veriodic increase in ambient noise levels in the vroject vicinitv
above levels existinJ! without the project?
No Impact: Refer to response H-50 above.
28
l\("r""'~A '--'.", "'0 11
""...."f,.Li. i!i.:Ai i" .---=:L-
PAGE Y \{ OF .):3
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May I, 2007
Mitigation Measures: None.
54) For a Dro;ect located within an airport land use Dlan or. where such a plan has not been
adoDted. within two miles of a DubUc airvort or DubUc use airvort. would the Dro;ect expose
Deople residing or worldnfl in the pro;ect area to excessive noise levels?
No Impact: The project consists of a Municipal Code amendment and does not involve any
physical development. Moreover, the modification of existing minimum landscape percentage
requirements for commercial and industrial zones will have no affect related to the City's
existing private use airport or noise levels associated thereto.
Mitigation Measures: None.
55) For a Dro;ect within the vicinitv of a Drivate airstriD. would the Dro;ect expose peoDle residing
or worldnfl in the pro;ect area to excessive noise levels?
No Impact: Refer to response H-54 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
L. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would tlte project:
56) Induce substantial DODulation flrowth in an area. either directlv (for examDle. bv DroDosinfl new
homes and businesses) or indirectlv (for examDle. through extension of roads or other
infrastructure) ?
No Impact: The purpose of Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02 is to allow for
modifications to the minimum landscape percentage requirements for commercial and industrial
development. The proposed amendment to the Municipal Code would not induce substantial
population growth in the City, either directly or indirectly nor would it cause displacement of
existing homes or residents. The proposed project is a regulatory adjustment and does not
include any physical development activities. Therefore, the proposed amendment would have
no significant impact on population and housing.
Mitigation Measures: None.
29
AGHJD!~
PACE
NO.
'1~ OF
4
):3
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
57) Displace substantial numbers of existing housinf!. necessitatinf! the construction ofreolacement
housinf! elsewhere?
No Impact: Refer to response L-56 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
58) Disolace substantial numbers of people. necessitatinf! the construction of reolacement housing
elsewhere?
No Impact: Refer to response L-56 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
M. PUBLIC SERVICES.
Would the oroject result in substantial adverse phvsical impacts associated with the orovision
of new or ohvsicallv altered f!overnmental facilities. need for new or phvsicallv altered
governmental facilities. the construction of which could cause significant environmental
impacts. in order to maintain acceptable service ratio. resoonse times or other oerformance
objectives for anv of the oublic service:
59) Fire protection?
No Impact. The proposed project is a regulatory adjustment and does not involve any
development. Therefore, the project will have no impact on the City's public services.
Mitigation Measures: None
60) Police protection?
No Impact: Refer to response M-59 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
61) Schools?
No Impact: Refer to response M-59 above.
30
AGfND/.\ NO.
PAGE Y b
4
OF r:3
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May I, 2007
Mitigation Measures: None.
62) Parks?
No Impact: The proposed amendment to the City's Municipal Code will not have an affect on
the number of persons using public parks. Therefore, the proposed amendment would have no
impacts on parks.
Mitigation Measures: None.
63) Other Public Facilities?
No Impact: Refer to response M-59 and M-62 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
N. RECREATION
64) Would the proposed proiect increase the use of existin!! nei!!hborhood and re!!ional parks or
other recreational facilities such that substantial phvsical deterioration of the facilitv would
occur or be accelerated?
No Impact: Refer to response M-59 and M-62 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
65) Does the proiect include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities that mi!!ht have an adverse effect on the environment?
No Impact: Refer to response M-59 and M-62 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
O. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would tlte project:
66) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existin!! traffic load and
capacity of the street svstem (i.e.. result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle
trios. the volume to capacity ratio on roads. or congestion at intersections)?
31
AGfNiJ/\ NO.
PACE ~ I
Lf
~3.
Of ~_
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
No Impact: The proposed amendment is only related to the modification of existing minimum
landscape requirements for commercial and industrial zones. The project would not require the
construction of new roads nor induce additional use of public/private roads. Therefore, the
proj ect would have no impact.
Mitigation Measures: None.
67) Exceed. either individuallv or cumulativelv. a level of service standard established bv the countv
conf!estion manaf!ement agencv for designated roads or hif!hwavs?
No Impact: Refer to response M-66 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
68) Result in a change in traffic patterns. includinf! either an increase in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial safetv risks?
No Impact: Refer to response M-66 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
69) Substantiallv increase hazards due to a design feature (e.f!.. sham curves or danf!erous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.f!.. farm equipmentJ?
No Impact: Refer to response M-66 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
70) Result in inadeQuate emerf!encv access?
No Impact: Refer to response M-66 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
71) Result in inadeQuate parkinf! cavacitv?
No Impact: The proposed Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment would increase the percentage of
required on-site landscaping for commercial and industrial development. The proposed Text
32 AGfpi'\i\ P-q) NO ~
.;AC~ '-~ ~ '- OF J;""3
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
Amendment applies to new development and establishes guidelines to incorporate adequate on-
site landscaping. Therefore, the proposed amendment will not result in inadequate parking
capacity.
Mitigation Measures: None.
72) Conflict with adopted policies. plans. or programs supportinJ! alternative transportation (e.J!.,
bus turnouts. bicvc/e racks)?
No Impact: The proposed amendment modifies zoning criteria related to minimum on-site
landscaping requirements for commercial and industrial zones. Therefore, no relationship exists
between the project and planning for alternative transportation modes.
Mitigation Measures: None.
P. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
73) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable ReJ!ional Water Oualitv Control
Board?
No Impact: The proposed amendment modifies zoning criteria related to minimum on-site
landscaping percentage requirements in commercial and industrial zones. Therefore, no
relationship exists between the project and the environmental issue identified above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
74) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or
expansion of existinJ! facilities. the construction of which could cause siJ!nificant environmental
effects?
No Impact: Refer to response P-73 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
75) ReQuire or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of
existinJ! facilities. the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
No Impact: Refer to response P-73 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
33
ACl:tW,,'\, NO. \..{
PAGE \..f G OF .\"3>
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
76) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existinz entitlements and
resources. or are new or expanded entitlements needed?
No Impact: Refer to response P-73 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
77) Result in a determination bv the wastewater treatment provider which serves or mav serve the
project that it has adeQuate capacitv to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the
provider's existinz commitments?
No Impact: Refer to response P-73 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
78) Be served bv a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid
waste disposal needs?
No Impact: Refer to response P-73 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
79) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
No Impact: Refer to response P-73 above.
Mitigation Measures: None.
Q. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
80) Does the vroject have the potential to dezrade the Quality of the environment. substantiallv
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species. cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaininf! levels. threaten to eliminate a plant or animal communitv. reduce the number or
restrict the ranze of a rare or endanzered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California history or prehistory?
No Impact: The project involves regulatory changes to the Municipal Code and no physical
development activity that could affect biological resources. Therefore, the proposed amendment
will have no impact on any sensitive plant or animal species or habitat. Likewise, there will be
34 ACiENDA ITEM NO. Y
-
PAGE & 0 OF S~
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
no conflict with any adopted city, county, regional, state or federal policies, goals, or plans
pertaining to the preservation and/or conservation of biological resources in the City of Lake
Elsinore.
81) Does the vro;ect have imvacts that are individuallv limited, but cumulativelv considerable?
("Cumulativelv considerable" means that the incremental effects of a vro;ect are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past pro;ects. the effects of other current pro;ects,
and the effects ofvrobable future proiects)?
No Impact: The project involves a Municipal Code amendment with no associated development
activity and, as such, there are no related or cumulative projects to be considered.
82) Does the pro;ect have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beinf!s, either directlv or indirectlv?
No Impact: The proposed project is a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment with no associated
physical environmental effects.
-End of Environmental Impact Evaluation Discussion -
35
AGHmA ITEM NO.
PACE S7
4
OF )7
City of Lake Elsinore
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
May 1, 2007
REFERENCES FOR ENIVRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The following references were utilized during preparation of this Initial Study:
1) City of Lake Elsinore General Plan.
36
ACrNDA liEi.., No.~L___.
PAGE_ ,) d- OF . )"3
CITY OF ~
LAKJ ,&LsiNO~
Y DREAM EXTREME..
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
(951) 674-3124 Voice (951) 471-1419 Fax
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Project Entitlement No(s): Zoninq Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-02
Applicant: City of Lake Elsinore
Address: 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
Project location: Citywide in the Commercial and Industrial Zones
Project Description: A request to amend portions of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter 17.40
(C-O Commercial Office), Chapter 17.44 (C-1 Neiahborhood Commercial District), Chapter 17.48 (C-
2 (General Commercial District), Chapter 17.52 (C-P Commercial Park District), Chapter 17.54 (C-M
Commercial Manufacturinq District), Chapter 17.56 (M-1 Limited Manufacturinq District), and
Chapter 17.60 (M-2 General Manufacturinq District) related to modifvinq the minimum on-site
landscape percentaqe requirements for development in Commercial and Industrial zones.
Based on the attached Initial Study prepared for this project, the City of Lake Elsinore has determined that
there would be no significant, adverse, effect on the environment due to the scope of the project. All other
materials that constitute the basis upon for determining to adopt this Negative Declaration are available for
public review at the City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA
92530. This document constitutes a Negative Declaration.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES (i.e., any agency that has discretionary approval power over the project):
City of Lake Elsinore
TRUSTEE AGENCIES (i.e., the California Department of Fish and Game, State lands Commission,
State Department of Parks and Recreation, and University of California):
None
Notice Pursuant to Section 21092.5 of the Public Resources Code:
A public hearing before the Planning Commission will be held on May 1, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. at the City of
Lake Elsinore Cultural Center, 183 North Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 to consider this project. At
that time, all interested parties are welcome to address the Planning Commission on this matter.
Prior to the public hearing, the public is invited to submit written comments on the proposed Negative
Declaration to the Planning Division, attention Tom Weiner, Planning Manager, 130 South Main Street,
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 or phone (951) 674-3124.
April 17, 2007
Date
Tom Weiner, Planning Manager
ACfNDA ITEM NO. Y
PACE ~---=3 OF S?
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
TO:
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION
FROM:
ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE:
MAY 1, 2007
PREPARED BY:
LINDA MILLER, PLANNING CONSULTANT
PROJECT TITLE:
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-05 FOR
A MAINTENANCE AND GOLF CART STORAGE
FACILITY
APPLICANT:
LAING CP LAKE ELSINORE, LLC. ATTENTION:
MICHAEL A. FILLER, 31881 CORYDON STREET,
SUITE 130, LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA 92530
OWNER:
SAME
PROJECT REQUESTS
Staff is requesting a continuance of this item to May 15, 2007 in order to clarify
circulation questions. The applicant is in concurrence with this request.
PREPARED BY: LINDA M. MILLER, PLANNING CONSULTANT
APPROVED BY:~
'ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ,
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
AOENDA ITEM r~o. 5
PAGE I r'i':: 1
.....--..".... _....-...~~
. --- '''P"..~"~