Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-06-1981 NAH . ~ MINUTE RECORD OF HELD ON THE CALL TO ORDER LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION 6th day of January 198~ ChaIrman Steed, 7:30 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by I'lanning Director Morrissey ----- ROLL CALL found Commissioners: burn and Chairman Steed. Kempe, Dominguez, Barnhart, Wash- Also present were: Planning Director. MINUTE ACTION: Commissioner Kempe requested that in Business Item "2 on ^mendment 80-2, the 18 ft off center line and the 80 ft right-of-way be changed to r~ad.2S ft off center line and the 80 ft right-of-way. Motion CommIssIoner Barnhart to approve minutes as submitted with change as requested, seconded Commissioner Dominguez. Minutes of December 16, 1980 approved as amended. INFOID4ATIONAL PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT - Staff informed Commission that Gener~lan 80-2 was approved as recommended with the 50ft curb to curb alignment in ':onformance with existing curb. Staff further informed Commission that the $10,000,000 for the mortgage revenue bond sale was not accomplished due to the 22% interest. Staff explained that marketing bonds was difficult when they reach"20% and that Citihank can't issue bonds with the coupon rate 10%. Nevertheless, the construction will remain on schedule and oth~r loans will be sought. ~ Sta~f then made comments on the Study Session in Sacramento, asking who would attend and that those who plan to attend notify the Planning Director or Planning Commission Secretary so that the necessary funds can be appropriated. Staff further explained that there were funds in the budget that had not heen used that could be applied towards this event. There was some discussion as to how more ~han one session could he attended since all the sessions were on different topics hut held concurrently. It was brought out that Commissioner Barnhart, Commissioner Washburn and Planning Director Morrissey had desires to attend. Commissioner Washburn discussed the possihility of setting up courtesy meetings with legislators. Staff commented that such meetings could be arranged with the legislature pending approval of City Council. Staff commented that Zone changes would be processed based upon its affect on housing in the area. Staff also informed the Commission that Tract Maps will be tabled at the meetings due to the time element recently set by the Stat and would recommend they be denied without prejudice. There was some discussion at that point with reference to a Tenative Tract Map being able to sit for as long as 2 years before acceptance of a final map by the Council. Staff's next topic of information was concerned with the fact that Mobile Homes will be allowed on Single Family Lots in the city as of July 1, 1981. A chapter of SB 1422 (Presly) Chapter 285 was read,to the Commission. It was brought out that consolidated bills would tax mobile homes on land not affixed on a lot as personal property and mobile homes affixed on a lot as real property and if license expires in excess of 120 days it will be taxed at the full rate. ..... -- - - ~ Minutes of Planning Commission January 6, 1981 Page 2 . COMMISSIONERS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Commissioner Kempe made comments on the holes on Lincoln Street. Commissioner Dominguez inquired as the the status of the removal of the billboards. Staff commented that council. had made .;: thi~ a priority item and further that the state is currently doing some investigation in regards to billboard removal which leaves the situation somewhat in limbo and might cause some limitations. There was fu~ther conversation on this matter dealing with nation wide bl1lboard removal and old billboards in the city which need to be changed as far as the incorrect information displayed on them. At this point Commissioner Dominguez reiterated that he would like to know the status of the removals to which Staff assured him that research would be done on the .item.and reported to him. Commissioner Washburn reported on NASA study with FEMA, stating that a letter was sent to NASA by David Sto110ff of Washington D. C. in which he expressed his full support of the project. Further discussion commenced on the Federal aspects of this project and its limitations. Commmissioner Barnhart made reference to the deteriorated sidewalks in the city and the commission discussed the responsiblity of sidewalk repair being that of the owner of the property or being billed to the owner if the city does the repair. Commissioner Washburn brought up the topic of annexation and the presentation by Kecor, staff gave explaination in respect to the annexation and offered information on amount of employment generated and demonstrated what is proposed, The discussion then went into highway alignment in the area of Lake Elsinore Ranchos. Chairman Steed stated that this was not the place to discussion this situation. With no further business motion Barnhart, second Commissioner Wash- burn to adjourn at 8:04 P.M. to the Design Review Board. Duly approved, 5 - o. Respectfully ~ Approved Bernadette Thompson Planning Commission Secretary W. Steed Chairman, Planning Commission MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON THE LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 6th DAY OF January 1981 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Steed opened meeting at 8=04 P.M. MINUTE ACTION Motion Boardmember Dominguez, second Boardmember Barnhart. - ADJOURNMENT With no further business, Motion Chairman Steed, second Boardmember Washburn, the regular meeting of the Dmsign Review Board adjourned nt 8=07 P.M. Duly approved 5-0.- Respectfully submitted Approved Bernadette Thompson Planning Commission Secertary W. Steed Chairman - - - ~t :1 .; MINUTE RECORD OF HELD ON THE LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION 20th DAY OF January 1981 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Steed at 7:30 P.M. ROLL CM.l, FOUND Commi55:ioner5: Kempe, Dominguez, Rarh:1Tt, W;1shhurn and Chairman Steed. Also present were: Jim Morrissey, Planning Director; John Porter, City Attorney, and; Councilman Unsworth. MINUTE ACTION Motion Commissioner Dominguez, seconded Commissioner Barnhart. Minutes of January 6, 1981 duly approved ns submitted. Chairman Steed acknowledged the presence of Councilman Unsworth and John Porter, City Attorney. PUBLIC HEARING Conditional Exception 80-1 At this time Chairman Steed opened the public hearing on Conditional Exception 80~1 located North of Robb Road, west to Terra Cotta Street (formally Illinois Street) commencing at 7:32. Staff presented proposal and reasons for requesting variance for Conditional Exception. Staff made reference to various court cases and the similarity of wording in the cases and in respective ordinances of Lake Elsinore. Staff further stated that the' lots arc 10,000 sq. ft. each ;1nd mini- mum lot size allowed in the zone is 6,000 sq. ft. Staff stated the project is categorically exempt under CEQA guidelines. Staff recommended denial of the project for the followin~ reasons: 1) the lots are within a new tract and the tract should have been originally designed to allow the sizes of the homes to meet the ordinance; 2) the lots were double the size permitted in the ordinance which allows a build~ble area of 2,750 sq. ft.; and 3) Economic hardship cannot be utilized to vary from the set back requirements. Chairman Steed then asked if there was anyone in the audience that would like to speak in favor of Conditional Exception SO-I. ^t this time Ken Glandt of Kaufman and Broad and Steve Good of Crosby engineers ;I!ld Associates came forward witlt c0pies of plans which they passed out to the commissioners. They hrought out that :Il the Lillie the pl:ll1s were drawn the designer did not have knowledge of the type of product to be used or other pertinent requirements. Mr. Goode then passed out 8xl1 plans showing the set backs in the rear and the size. Mr. G1andt stated that they wanted to construct houses that people could afford and that each home could not be custom made nevertheless, there are m~ny advantages such as being well located and abundant yard space. At this point Chairman Steed asked if there was anyone else in the audience in favor/opposition, there being none he closed the public hearing section at 7:54. At this time the commissioners were asked for comments. Commissioner Kempe stated he saw no problem; Commissioner Dominguez had no questions; Commissioner Barnhart made comments with respect to the cul-de-sac - and the area of the lot that would be left. There being no further comments it was moved by Commissioner Barnhart that Conditional Use Permit 80-1 be accepted, seconded Commissioner Dominguez. Unanimously .\ approved 5 - o. - BUSINESS ITEMS Chairman Steed opened Business Matters at 7:56. 1. Tentative Tract Map #17222 - Southwest of the intersection of Crestview Driv~ and Machado Street. A 42 lot residential subdivision. History of the Tract Map was given by Staff, emphasizing the fact that it proposed a dead end street which exceeds 650 feet and therefore exceeds the maximum requirements of Ordinance 529. Approval was recommended by staff if applicant , ~ J MinuteSt Planning Commission Page 2 - develops a master planned circulation route in and out of the tract. Staff additionally recommended that applicant dedicate lots 11 and 12 for a neighborhood park. There was at this point extensive discussion on park dedication and the lots that were heing dedicated and their location. Staff also indicated Government Code 664776 precluded staff from requiring dedication of land for parks under - 50 parcels. After several comments from the Commissioners, motion was made by Commissioner Dominguez to accept Staffs recommendation for approval of Tentative Tract Map "17222, seconded Commissioner Barnhart. Duly approved 5-0. 0onditions of Approval Tract Map #17222 1. Machado Street (a) Dedicate to provide for 44 ft. of half width right-of-way. (b) Install curb and gutter 32 ft. from street centerline. (c) Construct standard roadway between new curb and street centerline. 2. Interior Streets (a) Provide a street alignment to connect this tract to the property to the southwest and through to Machado Street (Master Planned Street) to he acceptcd hy City Engineer. (b) Dedicate to provide for 60 ft. of right-of-way with a standard knuckle at the bend. (c) Install curbs and gutter 18 ft. from street centerlinc. (d) Construct stn'ndnrd roadway betwccn new Clll"bs. 3. Construct standard sidewalks. 4. Install ornamental ~tr~et lights. 5. Pay for installation of street namcs signs. 6. Pay for the installation of stop sign. 7. Payoff any outstanding bonds from Assessment District No.1, or show approval from bond holder to split bonds if nott get paid off. 8. Process bond splits if necessary. 9. Construct sanitary sew~r to servc all parccls. 10. Construct adequate drainage facilities and ohtnin nny necessary casements or rights ror drainage discharge to properties not owned by the dcveloper. 11. Provide the city with water availability letter. 12. For design purposes, T.I. = 7 for Machado Street and '1'.1. = 6 will be used [or interior strcet. 13. Supply City Engineers uffice with centerline ties for the subdivision prior to release of any bonds of this tract. 14. All improvements to be designed by owner's civil engineer to the specifications of the city. 15. Dedicate lots 11 and 12 for a tract park in lieu of park dedication fees. 16. Meet all requirements of Southern California Edison Company. 17. Comply with all applicable ordinances and requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department. 18. Comply with Uniform Fire Code 13.301. 19. Pay all applicable fees at building permit stage. 20. Finding of no significant effect on the environment. 21. Issuance of a negative Declaration. - 2. Tentative Parcel Map # 16563 - A 2 lot subdivision. Ncar the intersection of Graham Avenue and Main Street. At this point Commissioner Dominguez excuse himself. Staff gave history of the project with the two recommendations that applicant meet all applicable requirements and ordinances of the Riverside County Fire Department as deemed reasonable and that final map be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Subdivision Map Act, i.e. Sections 66433, 66434 66434.5, 66435 and 66436. Commissioners made several comments as to the location and size. .Motion Commissioner Barnhart that recommendation of approval be accepted for Tentative Parcel Map 16563, seconded Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0. ~ ~ Minutes, Planning Commission Page 3 - 3. Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, (CEQA). Staff gave a brief summary of the CEQA Guidelines, stating that CEQA was so broad in scope, an EIR would be required in many instances. The new additions are meant to clarify the guidelines. Purther discussion was based around different ideas in CEQA guidelines, their effectiveness, non-effectiveness, and relation to various pro- jects in Lake Elsinore. After estensive discussion, Commissioner Wahsburn motioned that CEQA GUi.delines be accepted, and send to the Council, seconded, Commissioner Barhnart. Approved 5-0. -. 4. Intersection of Lakeshor~ ~nd Graham. Staff gave history of this item. Staff bought out that the item still has to be resolved even though it has heen considered hefore. Staf[ presented to Commission additional research and new proposals with reference to the intersection of Graham and Lakeshore. Staff gave a numher of suggestions as to how to solve the problem and the effects of various determinations on the project. Extensive discussion followed, bringing up new,lnd old ideas. The question was then brought up by Councilman Unsworth as to what the design was for the width of Lakeshore. After some additional discussion over the 7 proposals and the effects thereof Commissioner Washburn ,made the motion to 1) Deny proposals 1-7 as solutions to the intersection of Graham; 2) The intersection of Lakeshore and Graham Avenue should be engineered to smooth out the traffic flow in both directions by eliminating the bumps and hollows presently there; 3) Maintain the prsent alignment and flow of traffic along Lakeshore Drive; 4) Initiate a General Plan Amend- ment to designate Lakeshore Drive, between Main Street and Graham Avenue a secondary arterial with 50 feet curb-to-curb and 80 feet right-of-way, seconded Commissioner Barnhart. Duly approved 5-0. INFORMATIONAL Staff informed commission that there would be $900 availahle for the seminar, that arrangements had been processed and that in attendance would be Commissioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart and Planning Director Morrissey. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Informational, no comments by commission, nevertheless it was brought out that some of the commissioners receive Cjty Council minutes after each meeting in addition to the ones in the Commission packet. Staff ~tated that the minutes are included per request of the Planning Commission. PLANNING DIRECTORS REPORT - 1) On the 30th of this month, attempts will be made with the Recevelopment Agency to set up a Study Session with Council, Staff and Planning Commission. Staff is going to bring before the Commission a Redevelopment Project Area Plan at this time to be reveiwed. Meeting will be on Monday the 2nd at 7:30. 2) Staff brought up a report on Parks in which it is indicated that staff would like to see a larger site dedication for parks, but realizes th~t it might be too restrictive on developers and increase the price of the homes. Therefore, it is suggested that the amount of land be 5% of the overall land in the project, which takes 4.3% of the potential homes which could be developed and would caue the price of the homes not to exceed a 5% cost increase plus land cost. Staff feels that most of the children have to go too far and should have parks ~loser which in some instances would make it easy to have supervision. There were some comments made on parks and discussion was closed. Commissioner Washburn made the recommendation that Staff look into the revision of park land fees and bring it back to commission. Additionally staff stated that it would look into the variety of sizes and what the needs arc and where they might he appropriate 8;',(] where they 111 ight he inserted, Minutes, Planning Commission Page 4 -. policy wise in the General Plan. Staff made additional comments with reference to variances, lot size and available area on a lot. Emphasis was made on unnecessary hardships. Extensive discussion was held in this area with reference to anticipated tracts and models and other relative facts involved in tract placement, and development. COMMISSIONERS REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS Commissioner Barnhart asked that Commission give thanks for Hostages. Commissioner Washburn stated that what he had to say a hout NASA, he would ho lel; Ch:1-j rmnn Steed mnd e some ment j on 0 r the holes on Malago Road in which several comments insued and there was some mention as to a stop sign at 4 corners and hlack top condition in front of the Arco Station. --~ Th~ebeing no further business, motion Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Kempe to adjourn at 9:50 to the Design Review Board. Duly approved 5-0. Respectfully 'submitted, Approved: Bernadette Thompson, Planning Commission Secretary w. Steed Chairman, Planning Commission - - MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON THE CALL TO ORDER LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 20th DAY OF January 1981. Chairman Steed opened meeting at 9:50 P.M. MINUTE ^CTION Washburn. Motion Boardmember Kempe, second Boardmemher - ADJOURNMENT With no further business, Motion Boardmember Barnhart, second Boardmember Washburn, the regular meeting of the Design Review Board adjourned at 9:51 P.M. . Duly approved 5-0. Respectfully submitted Approved ernadette Thompson Planning Commission Secretary W. Steed Chairman - - MINUTE RECORD OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING CCt.1MISSION HELD ON THE 3rd DAY OF February 1981 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Corrmissioner Kempe at 7: 35 P.M. ROLL CALL FOUND Connnissioners: Kempe, Dominguez, Barnhart, Washburn and Chalnnan Steed. Also present were: Jim Morrissey, Planning Director and Councilman Unsworth. MINUTE ACfrON - Councilman Unsworth brought up that Condition #15 on page 2 of the minutes regarding Tract "17222 should have heen deleted: "Dedicate lots 11 and 12 for a tract park in lieu of park dedication fees." Motion Corrmissioner Barnhart to approve minutes as amended, seconded Corrmissioner Washburn. PUBLI C HEARING Chairman Steed opened Public Hearing at 7:38. 1. Conditional Exception 81-1 - Off Machado Street, between Joy Street and Lakeshore Drive. Staff gave history of the project stating that applicant proposed to vary from the set-back requirements of the front yard and the area adjacent the corner cuts. Staff further informed the COITmlission that this project relates to tracts 13569 and 13924 and Conditional Use Permits 80-2 and 80-3 which all have received City Council Approval. Staff suggested that consideration be given to the fact that there is a desi re for a Hordahl e housing in the city and that these homes are in the $45,000 to $55,000 bracket. At this time Chairman Steed asked if there was anyone in the audience who wanted to speak in favor of Conditional Exception 81-1. Dick Flannery, Land Development Consultant and L. Vincent Mayell, Land Developer came foward in favor of Conditional Exception 81-1 and introduced themselves to the Connnission. Mr. Flannery started off by bringing out the fact tlmt this project had heen hefore the Commission & C:ouncil hefore and that the site plan always ~ Jmd 15ft set back and 10 ft at the side which he thought had been explained and thus eliminated but realizes that it was not. Mr. Flannery then showed a map of the project illustrating the corner cut back for site distance purposes so when you turn you won't see a building, although 10 ft on the side and 15 ft in the front are not covered in the ordinance. Originally the plan showed the buildings touching, but that has been changed and cut to 5 ft hut noting could be done on the front. To provide affordable housing, 2500 sq. ft. per unit was needed. The options here were to have 20 ft. set back and parked cars would hang out or create interior parking with no parking in the front and bring cars in which is what they did. It was brought out by Mr. Mayell that this type of construction was allowed in the R-3 zone. There was some discussion as to the distance from the inside corner to the set back which was established to be 5.83 ft. Additionally, the sidewalk is located 5 ft. from any point of the huilding. Mr. Mayell did nevertheless inform the connnission that the price range of the homes was $49,900 to $59,900 instead of $45.00 to $55,000 which is still affordable housing. At this point Mr. Flannery and Mr. Mayell showed the connnission the layout of the homes and the design which they thought was pleasing with the different roof styles, landscaping and variety of designs. There were some comments made with reference to addressing the questions in the application. And Mr. Mayell asked if he might make a connnent which was not related to this project, which he was allowed to do. After being given permission to make his connnent, Mr. Mayell suggested that a useahle pun orJinance be aodpteJ for the benefit of the city. Staff stated that this - was being worked on. Chairman Steed closed the Public Hearing portion at 7:56. Chairman Steed then asked the Connnissioners if they had any comments. Commissioner Barnhart has no comments. Commissioner Washhurn stated that he felt that the rendition was nice and that Elsinore could use something like this, but the price should be keep as low as possible. Commissioner Dominguez questioned what the basis of denial by staff was, in which he was told by staff, just the set backs. There were a few other comnlents, then Staff asked that the comnlission waive the necessity of applicant going before Design Review Board if approved, therefore directing any other approvals to the Planning Director. Motion Comnlissioner Barnhart to approve cut so that design Review Board could be waived together with approval of Conditional Exception 81-1, seconded Commissioner Washburn. - - Minutes February 3, 1981 Page 2 Public Hearings (cont'd) 2. Lot Line Adjustment 80-5 & 6 - Southerly and Westerly of the intersection of Broadway Avenue and Illinois Street. Staff pointed out the location on a map, stating that it was 800 ft south of Lakeshore Drive bordered by Terra Cotta. Staff gave history stating that applicant desires to create 28 lots from 58, lot size being 11,400, and increasing the right of way dedication to 60 ft. instead of 50 feet. In doing this the applicant would have to provide a 24 foot access road to the area from Lakeshore drive. Staff saw no problems and recommended approval. At this time Mr. Lesser who was in the audience questioned whether the number of the Lot Line Adjustment was 80-4 & 5 or 80- S & 6. Staff commented that this would be corrected to be 80-4 & 5. At this point there was some discussion as to the existance of the street named Illinois and the fact that it might have to be changed, being that there are two of them. Mr. Lesser was asked that he keep in mind that he might have to come up with a name for the street at a later date if it is changed. There was further discussion in relation to the street dedication, the footage of the lots and the set backs. The Chairman asked if there was anyone opposed/ in favor of Lot Line Adjustment 80- 5 & 6. There being no one, the Public hearing was closed at 8:15 P.M. Motion Commissioner Barnhart, Second Commissioner Dominguez to approve Lot Line Adjustment 80- 5 & 6 with, 1) access to the lot being obtained in the Building Department stage and 2) Civil Engineer approving plan as submitted. Approved 5-0. BUSINESS ITEMS Chairman Steed opened Business Items at 8:15 P.M. 1. Processing Procedure - Staff recommended that the current process he revised to utilize the CnQA guidelineswhich would require all projects of discretionary nature to be brought before the Planning Commission and or City Council. Staff described discretionary projects as those that would affect adjacent property owners. Staff brought out that this item was brought before the Commission for comments after which there was extensive discussion regarding the effects of this procedure and examples of situations where this method would be advantageous. There was further discussiqn as to the lilllitations of the Design Review Board with respect to lot line adjustments etc. It was stated that more work would be put into filling out of a check list and whether or not CEQA put a check list. INFORMATIONAL - PLANNING DIRECTORS REPORT - Staff began by stating that the lJDAG grant was at present being reviewed by the Department of Development and that it w~uld be two weeks before any action is taken by the City Council with respect to the intersection of Lakeshore and Graham. Staff stated that the Survey area has been enlarged to include Heald to Chancy and Chancy to Main Streets. Staff made some comments as to the report by MSI and the fact that maps listed arc being drawn. Commissioner Washburn made comments on the blight report and the attempt to obtain a tax. Commissioner Kempe made re[erence to Page 11 - 14 and clarification with reg~Hd to Heald Street. Further discussion was directed towards the downtown flood channel being a direct effect on downtown which there were varied comments from the Commission. There was a general feeling that the downtown area could have the greatest impact for the least amount of money with respect to a project area. Staff commented on the Downtown Businessmens meeting and that there would be another in which it was hoped that all 45 members would attend. In reference to Redevelopment it was discussed as to the Sewer District, bonds and a treatment plant. It was suggested that the City Attorney be consulted before the line is extended. There was more discussion with reference to some of the ideas brought out by commissioners and staff feedback based on the report and future developments in the survey area. Minutes February 3, 1981 Page 3 COMMISSIONERS REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS -- Commissioners discussion commenced with reference being made to the hole on Malaga; the pot hole at Riley interesction and disucssion of the building next to Magills. Commissioner Dominguez pointed out that it was pitch hlack dark on Riverside Drive and Grand, and further that there was no light on Lincoln. Further discussion ensued regarding billboards in conjunction with state law changing and Code Enforcement Officer involvment. After some extensive discussion on relevant matters in connection with the areas brought up by the Commissioners, Commissioners Report and Recommendations were concluded. There being no further business, motion Commissioner Kempe, second Commissioner Barnhart to adjourn at 9:36 to Design Review Board. Duly approved 5-0. Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Bernadette Thompson, Planning Commission Secretary Approved: w. Steed Chairman, Planning Commission - - MINUTES OF THE LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD ON THE 3rd DAY OF February 1981. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Steed opened meeting at 9:37 P.M. MINUTE ACTION Dominguez. Motion Boardmember Barnhart, second Boardmenber PLANS FOR CONSIDERATION - 1. 517 Spring Street - Commercial - Ray Lewis. Staff gave history of the project, proposed use and description of plans. Staff recommended approval of the plans as submitted subject to submitting of a parking plan which had been submitted and was passed out to Boardmembers, therefore eliminating that provision of approval. The Board expressed concern as to the corragated roof, the fact that the building was not the most attractive giving bearing to the property value. There were also comments as to the building being a fire hazard and the noise of the staple guns (air). At this point denial was recommended by Boardmember Barnhart, second Boardmember Kempe, Obstained Boardmember Washburn. Denied 4-0. 2. Tract # 13569 and #13924 - 128 Condominium Units - No disucssion, necessary being approval of Design Review Board waived in the Planning Commission approval of Conditional Exception 81-1. With no further business, Motion Boardmcmber Kempe, second Boardmember Washburn, the regular meeting of the Design Review Board adjourned at 9:48 P.M. Duly approved 5-0. Respectfully submitted Approved - ~~ Bernadette Thompson Planning Commission Secretary W. Steed Chairman - RESOLUTION NO. 81-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE RECEIVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAN, LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND MAP DESIGNATING THE nOIJNDARIES FOn. TIm n.ANCHO LAGUNA REDgVELOPMEN'r PROJECT, AN AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. I AND AUTHORIZING THEIR TRANSMITTAL TO THE AFFECTED TAXING AGENCIES -- WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 33323 of the California Health and Safety Code, the Redevelopment Agency and the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore have cooperated in the selection of a Project Area and in the preparation of the Preliminary Plan for the Rancho Laguna Redevelopment Project, an amendment to Redevelopment Project No. Ii and WHEREAS, Section 33328 requires the transmittal of said documents to the affected taxing agencies. NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. That the Redevelopment Agency hereby acknowledges receipt of the Preliminary Plan, Legal Description and Map designating the boundaries for the Rancho Laguna Redevelopment Project, an ump.ndment to Redevelopment Project No. I. SECTION 2. That thp. Redevelopment Agency hereby directs the City Clerk to transmit to the Chief Administrative Office, Auditor and Tax Assessor of Riverside County and to the California State Board of Equalization the following: - A. A description of the boundaries of the Project Area. B. A statement that a Plan for Redevelopment of the Project is being prepared. C. A map indicating the boundaries of the Rancho Laguna Redevelopment Project, an amendment to Redevelopment Project No. I. D. A statement indicating the last equalized assessment role to be used for tax allocation purposes. SECTION 3. The Secretary of the Agency shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. ~ day of ::s- ~~ _ , 1916\. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this Chairman A'l"l' I'~S 'I' : - '-J, ~~'"\~~\~~~~ Sec etary MINUTE RECORD OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 17th DAY OF February 1981 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Barnhart ROLL CALL FOUND Commissioners: Kempe, Dominguez, Barnhart, Washburn and Chairman Steed. Also present were: Jim Morrissey, Planning Director and Councilman Unsworth. MINUTE ACTION Correction was made to the minutes by Commissioner Dominguez that he was not the one who spoke with referenc~to Lincoln that it was a member of the audience. Motion Commissioner Barnhart to approve minutes as amended, seconded Commissioner Washburn. PUBLIC HEARING - Chairman Steed opened Public I-fearing at 7: 35 P.M. 1. Conditional Use Permit 81-1 - Northerly of Lakehsore Drive, westerly of Terra Cotta Road. Staff gave history of the project stating that applicant is proposing temporary sales trailer to be utilized in the development and sales of lots for Tract 14901. Staff recommended approval of CUP 81-1 and a deter~ination that the project is consistent with the adopted general plan. Chairman Steed closed the public hearing at 7:36 asking if there was anyone in favor/opposed to Conditional Use Perm~t 81-1. Commissioner Kempe inquired as to whether there was a time limit on this use. After some dicussion it was felt that the construction trailer was sufficient hut that the sales trailer was not a necessity being that a model home could serve the same purpose and the sales trailer should only remain until such time as the model was completed, which should not he more than ninety days. Commissioner Kempe motioned that since there was no one there to represent the applicant that the CUP be tabled until next meeting, seconded Commissioner Washburn. Further discussion followed as to the date of the next meeting being March 3, 1981. 2. Zone Change 81-1 - Northerly of the intersection of Railroad Canyon Road and Highway 71/1-15. Change from R-l to CP.. Staff gave history as to the proposal of the applicant stating that in changing from R-l to CP it would allow any type of commercial use. Staff felt that being that the sites were adjacent the freeway entrance to the city that C-1 zoning would be more feasible in that the uses permitted in C-1 would be more appropriate in this area. Therefore staff recommended that CP zoning be replaced with C-l zoning. Staff further commented on the applicants request for street vacation of "old" Railroad Canyon Road and the Foran Bill provisions for adoption of a general plan element or zoning ordinance. After further discussion by staff a recommendation was made for a negative declaration and finding of 1) conformance with the General Plan; 2) no significant impact on the environment, and; 3) no effect upon housing opportunities in the region. At this point Chairman Steed made the comment that it would be to the advantage of the City to have the zoning CP instead of C-1 due to the fact that there is more control in CPo At this point Roh Galleghar came forward in favor of Zone Change 81-1. Rob Galleghar made statements as to the limitaion of C-l in which further conversation insued in this area. Chairman Steed made reference to Parcel "D" being land-locked and whether or not it had ever been used. Rob Galleghar stated that it had not. The discussion then centered around how a zone change can be approved on a lot without access. It was then brought out that the same owner did not own parcel "D" and the lot in front of it. It was established that this land was owned by Mr. Michale Grinel and that the only ingress and egress was through his property. - Minutes February 17, 1981 Page 2 - After considerable discussions to the access ~6 this property and a brief comment from Mr. Michael Grinnel, Chairman Steed then asked if there was anyone in opposition. At this time Mr. Michael Grinnel introduced himself as the owner of the property abutting parcel "D", stating that his previeo.s statment was in opposition and that the portion of property on 71 might possibly be deeded or sold to him in the future. Chairman Steed closed the puhlic hearing at 8:02 P.M. Chairman Steed then asked the Commissioners if they had any comments. There was discussion at this point regarding the owners of the property, how much acreage was involved, and more discusion on CP and/or C-1 zoning. After extensive discussion by Commissioners and staff a motion was made by Commissioner Washburn to approve Zone Change 81-1 for parcels A,B, and C to CP (Commercial Park) with the exclusion of Parcel D which would be C-1, ana that the zone change not be approved until legal access is obtained to parcel D, seconded Commmissioner Kempe. BUSINESS MATTERS Chairman Steed opened Business items at 8:20 P.M. - 1. Redevelopment Preliminary Plan - Staff gave the background on several items with references supporting maps, which it was stated that it was mostly correct, except a portion in the survey area. Staff made reference to one of the books that was enclosed in the Agenda packet and found it was inadvertantly left out by the Planning Commission Secretary. It was suggested at this point that there be a brief recess so that the Commissioners could be given this book and look it over. Chairman Steed then called a 10 minute recess at 8:25 and the Commission adjoured to another office for discussion with Staff and MSI on the Redevelop- ment Preliminary Plan. At 8:40 P.M. the meeting resumed with a motion that the Preliminary Redevelopment Plan be tabled and a Special Meeting of the Commission be held on February 23, 1981 at 6:00 for further disucsion on it and accompanying Resolution. 2. Annexation Proposal - History was given on subject annexation. Discussion centered around C-2 and C-1 zoning. There was some concern as to what was not in the area and what might go. in the area. There was di~cussion as to the limitations of CP zoning. It was further brought out that CP zones could always be brought down to lesser zonings. Motion was made by Commissioner Washburn that Planning Commission recommend a positive conside~ation to City Council of this 50 acre annexation with the following condi- tions, 1) An EIR is provided to ascertain the environmental and fiscal aspects of the annexation such as traffic generation and the impact upon the downtown sales arew;,2) An analysis of public services is provided indicating the necessity for certain services, including but not limited to, sewer, water police and fire; 3) That the applicant be required to join an assessment district if one is placed adjacent the site; 4) An agreement between the developer and city indicating only commercial structures will bedeveloped on the site; 5) Pre-annexation zoning is obtained; 6) The land use map/ general plan policies are amended to accept the annexation, seconded Commissioner Barnhart. - 3. Processing Revision - Staff stated this revision had been pre- viously brought before the Commission at which time the Commission requested to see the list staff was to utilize. It was questioned whether this reflected the recent requirements of CEQA. Staff gave further explaination on this procedure, pointing out when a project is before the commission it will also be brought before the Design Review Board on the same night. It was then moved by Commissioner Barnhart that the review be accepted and be forwarded to the Council with Commission approval, seconded Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0. Minutes February 17, 1981 Page 3 - Business (cont'd) 4. Park Land - Staff stated the Commission had requested additional information on park dedication due to the fact that the Government Code did not allow tracts of 50 or less to dedicate park land. Staff indicated that this report deals with the planning process and ana1yzation of present facilities. Staff stated that the cost of preparing a site would be $100,000. Staff further referred to a diagram which is based on the ratio method and radius method. Staff further showed commission where the parks were located, who used the~ etc. There was some discussion on park maintenance and the. influence of city and county. Staff was questioned as to whether or not Parks and Recreation had been consulted. There was extensive discussion as to postage stamp parks, size of parks, facilities, farming out of park maintenance, assessing of money at the building permit stage and the adequate size of parks. After extensive conversation about parks Commissioner Washburn stated that he would like to see a less than one page report from staff of descriptions of pros and cons opposing parks for various developments. Commission requested staff to pro- vide more information on the items that were discussed. 5. Environmental Information - Staff made presentation on article regarding environmental affect of uncontrolled development. Staff thought this was a timely article due to the commissions concern about government requiring additional information that causes delay in development. Short discussion was held on subject, commission expressed their interest in article and so noted it for the record. - 6. Staff made presentation on General Plan Amendment previously reviewed by the Planning Commission. The City Council had requested additional information regarding this item. Staff had provided that information to the council at which time the council recommended the information be brought before the commission. The Planning Commission questioned the need to review this proposal again. Staff indicated it was following through with the City Council request to obtain recommendations from the Planning Commission Lengthy discussion ensued. Commissioner questioned cost benefit of this proposal as related to the previous 7 engineering proposals represented some time ago by staff. Staff indicated the commission need only make a motion regarding this item, and not a motion on the other three items which together form 4 recommendations which were pr~sented to the Council. The commission requested to see the recommendation as presented to Council at whiCh time staff suggested that the commission move to the next item on the agenda while staff obtains the report presented to the City Council. Upon obtaining report Motion was made by Commissioner Barnhart, seconded Commissioner Washburn to deny recommendation #4 of the 4 previous recommendations. INFORMATIONAL - PLANNING DIRECTORS REPORT - Staff made comments on an announcement that had been circulated to the commissioners regarding S3 1960 and informed commissioners that they notify staff if they wanted to attend. There was some discussion on Billboards, with staff indicating they had provided information in the form of a memo regarding recent legislation on the issue. Staff stated the letter to be sent to the billboard company is being prepared. -, .l Minutes February 17, 1981 Page 4 COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Commissioner Kempe reported that there were some people on Lincoln bringing a suit. Commissioner Dominguez made comments as to the buses not running on holidays. It was further mentioned that there would be a report at the next meeting regarding highlights from the conference in Sacramento. __ There being no further business, motion Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Washburn to adjourn at 10:25 to Design Review Board, Duly approved 5-0. Resp:ctf~llY submitted, ~ ~~~~.=J\,-j Bernadette Thompson Planning Commission Secretary Approved: W. Steed Chairman -- -- MINUTES OF THE LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD ON THE 17th DAY OF F eh,r,:U:il~y 1981. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Steed opened meeting at 10:25 MINUTE ACTION Motion Boardmemhcr Barnhart, second Boardmember Kempe to approve minutes as submitted. PLANS FOR CONSIDERATION - 1. 517 Spring Street - Commercial Building - Ray Lewis - Staff gave history stating that this building had come before the Design Review Board on February 3, 1981 at which time it was denied on the basis of the corragated roof and possibility of being a fire hazard. Staff further summarized the changes that have been made by the applicant whereby there have been open doors placed on the side of the structure and the addition of composition roof shingle. Staff recommended approval. The Commission had some questions as to whether or not chemical toilets would be used, if the building would be temporary and what would be the duration. After further discussion with regard to other pertinent aspects of the structure motion Boardmember Dominguez, second Boardmember Kempe to approve Commercial Building as submitted subject to review and extent ion (if needed) in 3 years. Duly approved 5-0. There being no further business, Motion Boardmember Barnhart, secon Boardmember Kempe, the regular meeting of the Design Review Board adjourned at 10:33 P.M. Duly approved 5-0. Respectfully submittedi ~~~~~~~U; Bernadette Thompson Planning Commission Secretary Approved w. Steed Chairman - - MINUTE RECCRD OF SPECIAL MEETING llELD ON TIlE 23rd LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION DAY OF february, 1981 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Planning Director Morrissey, 6:04 P.M. - ROLL CALL FOUND Commissioners: Kempe, Dominguez, Barnhart and Chairman Steed Absent was Commissioner Washburn. Also present were: Jim Morrissey, Planning Director and Councilman Unsworth. Chairman Steed stated the meeting was a continuation of Planning Commission meeting of February 17, 1981. PUBLIC HEARING Chairman Steed opened Public Hearing at 6:05 P.M. as continuation of Public Hearing on meeting of February 17, 1981 in which there was no representation by applicant. 1. Conditional Use Permit 81-1 - Northerly of Lakeshore Drive, westerly of Terra Cotta Road. Staff gave history of the project stating that applicant is proposing temporary sales trailer to be utilized in the development and sales of lots for Tract 14901. Staff recommended approval of CUP 81-1 and a determination that the project is consistent with the adopted general plan. Present to represent Kaufman & Broad was Bill Pisetsky in favor of CUP 81-1. There was some discussion with Mr. Pisetsky as to the length of time needed for the sales trailer. There being no one in opposition the Public hearing was closed and motion was made by Commissioner Kempe to approve the construction trailer for one year and the sales trailer for 6 months with a review at that time if additional time is needed, seconded Commissioner Barnhart. Duly approved 4-0. - BUSINESS MATTERS - 1. Extension of Environmental Review of TTM #17314 - Staff stated to the commission that the Canyon Lake Hills annexation which was approved in 1980 did require as part of the agreement an annexation Environmental Report. Staff explained that at present there were some questions relating to the documents as described in the memo presented to the commission which would require additional time therefore preventing staff from meeting with the prescribed dead- line. Staff therefore requested that the Commission deny without prejudice for one month the proposed project until staff can obtain adequate information regarding environmental review, phasing of development, and addressing density requirements within the project. Motion was made by Commissioner Barnhart to accept this recommendation by staff, seconded by Commissioner Kempe. Redevelopment - Staff made brief presentation on the Redevelop packet after which a period insued for comments and questions. Chairman Steed presented a number of comments that had been submitted to him hy Commissioner Washhurn who was not present at this meeting as follows: 1) Spelling of Malaga incorrect; 2) what are the unique items, i.e. the unique environmental qualities. These should be spelled out in the report; 3) the word channel should be included, due \to'thc master plan concept of the future use of the channel. Brice Russell, represen- tative for MSI, the originator of the documents stated that he would contact Commissioner Gary Washburn with reference to his comments. There were additional comments made by the Commissioners with reference to curbs, gutters and paving of streets and various other items presented in the booklets. After some extensive discussion it was moved by Commissioner Barnhart to accept the proposed Resolution 81-1 designating a Redevelopment project Area and adopting a Preliminary Plan for the Rancho Laguna Redevelopment Project Area, an amendment to RedevelOp- ment Project Area No. I. with revisions as noted and pass on to City Council, seconded Commissioner Dominguez. 2. Minutes February 23, 1981 Page 2 There being no further business motion Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Kempe, the special meeting of the Planning Commissioner was adjourned at 6:32 P.M. - Respectfully submitted, \ ~ \- ../) \. c.:J?{..:.l'\~T:7'~'~~~9-"'\'-- / Bernadette Thompson, Planning Commission Secretary Approved: w. Steed Chairman - - RESOLUTION NO. 81-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE RECEIVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAN, LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND MAP DESIGNATING THE BOUNDARIES l"OR THE RANCHO LAGUNA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT, AN AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. I AND AUTHORIZING THEIR 'fRANSMITTAL TO 'fHE AFFECTED TAXING AGENCIES - WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 33323 of the California Health and Safety Code, the Redevelopment Agency and the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore have cooperated in the selection of a Project Area and in the preparation of the Preliminary plan for the Rancho Laguna Redevelopment Project, an amendment to Redevelopment Project No. Ii and WHEREAS, Section 33328 requires the transmittal of said documents to the affected taxing agencies. NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. That the Redevelopment Agency hereby acknowledges receipt of the Preliminary Plan, Legal Description and Map designating the boundaries for the Rancho Laguna Redevelopment Project, an amendment to Redevelopment Project No. I. SECTION 2. That the Redevelopment Agency hereby directs the City Clerk to transmit to the Chief Administrative Office, Auditor and Tax Assessor of Riverside County and to the California State Board of Equalization the following: - A. A description of the boundaries of the Project Area. B. A statement that a Plan for Redevelopment of the Project is being prepared. c. A map indicating the boundaries of the Rancho Laguna Redevelopment Project, an amendment to Redevelopment Project No. I. D. A statement indicating the last equalized assessment role to be used for tax allocation purposes. SECTION 3. The Secretary of the Agency shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ~~~day of ~5)~y~ ,198t Chairman - AT'fEST: ~~~~ MINUTE RECORD OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 3rd DAY OF March 1981 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Barnhart 7:34 ROLL CALL FOUND Commissioners: Kempe, Dominguez, Barnhart, Washburn anu Chairman Steed. Also present were: Jim Morrissey, Planning Director and Councilman Unsworth. ----- MINUTE ACTION Staff stated to Commission that the minutes were not completed in time and would be presented at the next meeting. PUBLIC HEARING Chairman Steed opened Public Hearing at 7:35. 1. Conditional Use Permit 81-3 - 14 Condominium units on a one lot sub- division of .6 acres located on Joy Street between Riverside Drive and Machado Street. Staff gave history of the project stating it was near the intersection of Joy Street and Riverside Drive, which is designated RC (Retail Commercial) on the land use map. Therefore a decision should be made regarding the area on influence of the Retail Commercial circles, so a determination can be made regarding the projects conformance with the General Plan. After 'further presen- tation by staff, Chairman Steed asked if there was anyone in the audience in favor of CUP 81-3. At this time Steve Cavanaugh intro- duced himself as the applicant. Some discussion was made with refer- ence to the location of the school and covered trash recepticles. Commission asked applicant to get together with staff to designate an area Eor the trash recepticle. After some discussion was made with reference to the location of the school and covered trash recepticles. Chairman Steeu closeu the Public hearing at 7:47. After some comments ----- from Commissioners, motion Commissioner Barnhart to approve CUP 81-3 and Tentative Tract Map 17315 subject to the following conditions with the addition of item # 11. ----- 1. That the applicant construct the proposed condominium structure in accord with the requirements of the Design Review Board. 2. All exterior lights necessary for the subject buildings and property be placed and fixed so as not to shine out onto any adjacent structure in the subdivision or any surrounding development in any manner so as to provide a nuisance or hazard to road traffic or affect the living environment of the area. 3. That CC & Rls and Homeowners Management Association Rules and Regulations shall be submitted to the Planning Department for the record and approval. These rules shall include a statement that the Homeowners Management Association shall maintain and be responsible for all landscaping, buildings, and facilities on the subject property. 4. That all landscaping, including a functioning water system, be installed and maintained, and that this conditions also be included in the CC & Rls and Homeowners Management Associa- tion Rules and Regulations, with a statement indicating that parking, paving and landscaping facilities, be provided as indicated on the required plot plan. 5. That all roof-maintained or ground-supported structures and equipment incidential to the development be architectually screened so that they are not visible from the neighboring property or the public street, with such screening subject to approval of the Design Review Board. 6. Except for strictly interior modifications to individual units, no substantial structural alterations, except for inci- dental maintenance, shall be made to any of the existing residential or common areas, unless plot plans and elevations are submitted to the Planning Department and a finding of substantial conformance is made. - - - Minutes March 3, 1981 Page 2 7. Parking shall be covered and uncovered as indicated on the approved plot plan. All signs shall tonform to the city's sign ordinance. 8. Applicants shall comply with all noise level regulations of the City. 9. Project shall comply with all applicable ordinances of the city. 10. One parking space on the southwesterly side shall be eliminated and the remainder of the spaces centered and moved five (5) feet from the property line. 11. Applicant shall design a screened trash area. The Commission further agreed that it was not necessary for the applicant to stay for Design Review Board being that all aspects had been covered. Therefore approving Tentative Tract Map 17315. 5-0. BUSINESS ITEMS 1. General Plan Presentation - Staff opened General Plan presentation by making reference to the memo contained in the packet which des- cribed the various reyuirements of the General Plan and what staff has been doing in the area and further that the intent of the plan is to provide for community growth and development. Staff stated the phases lin order starting with 1) Collecting data; 2) portray data in a useable manner; 3) develop policies to mitigate problems and enhance opportunities; 4) consistency between elements. Staff further commented on where the commission would be involved made reference to housing, jobs water systems, sewer, citizens deisres, aesthetics of community, how downtown looks and revision of general plan. After some additional background, staff commenced to show slides wherein a certain area was developed around transportation lines based on 1 sq. mile blocks representing industrial areas, urban areas, open space etc. after the presentation, there was concern by the comm- issioners as to the ddfference in size between the illustrated city and Lake Elisnore. Staff explained to the commission that the idea was not the size, but the method of development that was important. There was then some dis~ussion as to whose problem General Plan revision would be. Extensive discussion followed regarding the presentation. It was then moved that the Planning Commission recess to Design Review Board at 8:13. Planning Commission resumed at 8:36. 2. Commissioners reported on League of Cities heldl:in . ',' Sacramento. In attendance were Commissioners Washburn and Barnhart, who outlined the various programs & semin~s that they attended and their relations to duties as a Lake Elsinore Planning Commissioner, in areas such as housing, redevelopment, land use and general plan. Gary Washburn submitted information to all the Commissioners regarding the specific seminars he attended. A general discussion was then held in relation to the items presented of which Commissioner's so noted. INFORMATIONAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - no comments. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT - As an aid to the Planning Commission in its Design Review Board and its dual function as members of the Design Review Board, staff indicated a willingness to take slides of cities and report on the development. The Commissioner by consensus directed staff to take the slides and report back. Staff indicated that the General Plan Amendment had been brought before the Council and accepted as recommended by the Planning Commission at the previous meeting. Minutes March 3, 1981 Page 3 - PLANNING COMMISSIONERS REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS - Commissioner Dominguez inquired with respect to the lights at the intersections of Grand and Riverside and Chaney & Davis. Commissioner Kempe made comments with regard to the right of way in Country 'lub heights. There was considerable discussion with regard to the activities of the Code Enforcement Officer with a recommendation that it be brought before the Council that the Code Enforcement Officer act on sight and not just complaints. Further discussion in sued with regard to various violations in the city that have not been cited. Chairman Steed made comments with reference to the person using Johns Western Auto shop as a body and fender repair and painting booth. Also the Ambulance company putting in showers without a permit and other violations of the ambulance company. Commissioner Washburn made the suggestion that a portfolio should be developed dis- playing a success story to show builders and developers. There was a question presented as to Bob Williams Mobilehome Sales lot and its operation without obtaining a Conditional Use Permit from the Planning Commission. The Planning Director indicated that the Code Enforcement Officer has researched the file and found that upon approval of the zone change the the proposed use as a mobilehome slaes lot was submitted to the Commission and the Council. There being no further business, the regular meeting of the Lake Elisnore Planning Commission was adjourned at 9:45 P.M. Mot~on Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Washburn. Respectfully submitted Approved: ~ =..-"'-. \') ~---"I \__y)_d-'\~"''''\~O~-} Bernadette Thompson Planning Commissioner Secretary W. Steed Chairman - - LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON THE 3rd March 3, 1981 DAY OF MINUTE ACTION posponed to a later date, at 8:13 P.M. Plans to be Considered 1. 113 Sulphur - Commercial Offices located near the intersection of Main Street and Sulphur. Staff gave history stating that applicant proposes a 1449 ~quare foot building with 1040 square feet of office area and that Applicant was before the board on December 2, 1980 and denied due to incress and egress of project which has now been revised. Staff recommended approval subject to revising parking area and resubmitting. -~,--' .,J , :t. The Board made comments with regard to the alley going from north to south and entrance being off of Graham Street, the problems that would be presented to the people in the rear and the appearance of a Barn type structure in the downtown area. After some extensive discussion by the board with regard to this proposal, it was moved by Board- member Barnhart, seconded, Commissioner Kempe to Deny without prejudice the proposed commercial office. 2. Tract 17314 - 14 Condominium Units located on Joy Street between Riverside Drive and Machado Street. 1. 2 . - 3. 4. 5. 6. 7 . 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. ?~.. 13. -..( 14. - 15. 16. It was stated that approval of Tract 17314 had been done in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit 81-3 in the Planning Commission of this date subject to the following Conditions: Install curb and gutter 20' from street centerline. Construct standard roadway between new curb and street centerl ine. . Construct standard sidewalk. Install sanitary sewer system to serve property. Obtain "Will Serve" letter from appropriate water district. Payoff any outstanding sewer bonds from Assessment District No.1. Provide adequate drainage facilities. Comply with the requirements of Subdivisions Map Act and City Ordinance 529. Improvements required have been designed previously by the city however, the plans should be updated to provide for specific improvements for this parcel by owner's civil engineer. Install ornamental street lights as required. Meet all requirements of Southern California Edison Company. Comply with all applicable ordinances and requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department. Comply with Uniform Fire Code 13.301. Pay all paplicalbe fees at building permit stage. Finding of no significant impact upon the environment. Issuance of a negative declaration. ADJOURNMENT ,.-- " ~ " - I' MINUTE RECORD OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 17th DAY OF March 1981 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Washburn, 7:33 P.M. ROLL CALL FOUND Commissioners: Kempe, Dominguez, Barnhart, Washburn and Chairman Steed. Also present was: Jim Morrissey, Planning Director MINUTE ACTION Minutes of February 17, 1981, corrections were noted, motion Commissioner Barnhart, seconded Commissioner Washburn to approve minutes as amended. Minutes of February 23, 1981, corrections were noted together with ommission of Design Review Minutes, Motion Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Washburn to approve minutes as amended and table Design Review Minutes until next meeting. Minutes of March 3, 1981, motion Commissioner Barn- hart, second Commissioner Washburn to table until next meeting. PUBLIC HEARING Chairman Steed opened Public Hearing at 7:40. 1. Lot Line Adjustment 81-5 - Located westerly and southerly of the inter- section of Lakeshore Drive and Illinois Street in the "old Towne of Lucerne". Staff gave history stating that applicant proposes to make 88 lots from 128 lots, the new lots being 7,000 sq. ft. All streets and alleys have been vacated and dedication will be made at the time of approval. Staff then directed the Commissions attention to the traffic flow map explaining ingress and egress from the project site should be from Ohio Street since the tract northerly of the project has access at two separate points, with an additional intersection at Terra Cotta, all within one-quarter mile as stated in Ordinance 529. Staff then recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. A legal description is submitted designating the lots as shown. 2. A record of Survey is submitted as required by state law identified by the legal description to be submitted in conditional. 3. All streets are dedicated as shown. 4. Acceptance of new street names as presented. PREVIOUS NAME NEW NAME A. Illinois Street B. Kansas C. Pennsylvania D. Maine Street Torn Ranch Road Woodlake Street Pennsylvania Ralph Rd. 5. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 6. Issuance of a negative declaration. 7. The challenge period for this environmental finding shall be 40 day~ from time of approval. Commissioner Barnhart then questioned staff as to whether Ohio would remain the same name, staff indicated that it would. After some discussion, Commission requested' that. they hear from the appl icant with respect to the reasoning behind some of the street names. At this point Fred Crow introduced himself as a representative for the applicant. Mr. Crow stated that the reason for Illinois being changed to Torn Ranch Road was that it had always been the street leading to Torn Ranch. After some discussion by Commission, it was decided that to make Illinois Street, Terra Cotta, therefore continuing the existing Terra Cotta Road and make Ohio, Torn Ranch Road being that it leads to Torn Ranch. Further discussion insued, with some input from Mr. Crow. Mr. Crow then asked commission if his applicant could obtain Building permits, etc. during the 40 day environmental. Staff stated that there is always a 30 day minimum, but staf.f listed 40 since it was not advertised very long and that projects can start immediately after approval. After some random discussion with re- ference to the Commission not seeing elevations and the fact that Single-family residences are no longer reviewed by the Design Review Board, was decided that the only changes would be to the names of the ,.... ~ ..... Minutes March 17, 1981 Page 2 streets. Motion Commissioner Barnhart to approve project as submitted with the addition of item E, making Ohio Street, Torn Ranell Road and item A. Illinois Street name being changed to Terra Cotta, and accepting staff recommendations, seconded Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0. 2. Design Review Criteria - Staff stated that the Commission had in- dicated a desire to review other developments and that staff had agreed to present various proposals from the City of Cerritos, showing why it is believed this type of design criteria is effective and can be implemented in Lake Elsinore. At this point, Chairman Steed asked staff how long the presentation would be with the slides. Staff stated about 10 minutes. Chairman Steed then stated that since there was only one item on the Design Review that the Planning Commission should move to the Design Review Board and then return to Business Item #2. Motion Commissioner Washburn, seconded Commissioner Barnhart to move to Desig~ Review Board at 8:00. Business Item #2 was resumed at 8:05. 2. cont'd - Staff explained that Cerritos has specific ordinances which give their staff leeway to do specific things, they are looking for a certain type of community and their desires are producing attractive projects. Staff at this time showed slides with emphasis on Indus- trial areas, landscaping, required parking areas (indicating how trucks can be hidden by trees, Shopping Areas, amount of traffic, type of set backs, how certain landscaping is even required in interior parking areas. The Commission asked a number of other questions, which staff responded. The Commission so noted the presentation. After the presentation Commissioner Washburn stated that he felt that applicants should receive guidelines of what we are looking for so that the applicant can modify their own drawings (commercial). Staff explained that there arc no guidelines for commercial but there were for single- family residences which are given to the proposing applicant together with a list of trees. At this point there was disucssion as to how to present to a developer/applicant guidelines through pictures or the like of what has been done in the past, in the form of a portfolio. Staff informed the Commission that presently the ordinance for single- family residence is being modified to accomodate mobilehomes which will in turn have some effect on single-family residence. Commissioner Barnhart made comments with reference to the mobilehome ordinance and possible CUP's for mobilehomes. There were some comments from staff relative to the options and problems thereof. Staff further explained compatability and its bearing on the City of Lake Elsinore as opposed to its bearing on other areas. After more discussion by the Commiss- ion with regard to CUP's/mobilehomes, it was requested that this topic be put on the agenda for the next meeting with some added input. 3. Street widths on Country Club H.eights - Commissioner Kempe brought out that the old tract map showed a 40 ft. right-of-way, but that City ordinance stated 60, and if 10 ft were taken from occupants on both sides of the street, there would not be much of a lot left. Staff at this time presented a letter addressed to Staff and Joe Kicak with reference to items mentioned by Commissioner Kempe, which staff read to the Commission and later passed around to the Commissio- ners. After a brief discussion on the right-of-way and affects thereof, with some input from Fred Crow, it was concurred that a recommendation be made to the City Council. Chairman Steed at this point brought out the fact that about 6 years ago this same situation was discussed for which he would find the minutes in his records and bring to the next meeting for further information and input. After extensive dis- cussion on this topic, motion Commissioner Kempe, second Commissioner Barnhart, to conform to the CountrY Club Heights Tract Maps in respect to the right-of-way width with sub-standard roads being at a minimum of 40 feet right-of-way. Minutes March 17, 1981 Page 3 INFORMATIONAL ..... 1. Code Enforcement Officer's Activities - Staff reviewed the memo based on the outcome of the Plann~ng commission recommendation to the City Council, stating that it was referred to the City Manager due to the fact that it was a personnel problem. There was some discussion as to why this action was taken and that it was not the request of the Planning Commission. Staff explained to the Commission the reasoning for City Council referring the pro- blem to the City Manager and there were no further questions. 2. City Council Minutes - Commission stated that they had received the mlnutes ~n the mail and had no questions relative to them. 3. Planning Directors Report - Staff stated that there was no report 4. Commissioners Reports and Recommendations - Commissioner Dominguez made reference to old trees belng removed in the City and new trees replacing them, but was concerned as to what type of trees. Reference was made to the tree list and the possibility of it being more limited. There was some discussion as to the types of trees, and a suggestion that it be revised. Commissioner Washburn made reference to the intersection of Lindsey and Lakeshore having a buckboaxd road which he wanted to see repaired. Commissioner Barnhart made mention of the mobile that had been pulled out of state park still being in the same place. Also the houses that were moved by the ready-mix still being there. ~ Chairman Steed stated that Graham Avenue should be completed and that future contracts with Fontana Paving should be looked at a little closer. There being no further business, Lake Elsinore Planning Commission adjourned at 9:20, motion Commissioner Barhart, second Commissioner Washburn. Respectfully submitted, Approved: Bernadette Thompson, Planning Commission Secertary W. Steed Chairman ..... MINUTE RECORD OF LAKE ELI SNORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD ON THE 17th DAY OF March 1981 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Steed opened meeting at 8:00 MINUTE ACTION Minutes tabled until next meeting, Motion Boardmember Barnhart, second Boardmember Washburn. -- PLANS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. 32310 Riverside Drive - an exterior revision to a commercial structure owned by Catherine Jordan. Staff gave description stating that applicant proposes to revise the front of an existing commercial use which would be considered a "false front". Further that the revision has beams 24" olc which will project from the structure with no materials on it allowing it to be open, with redwood decking used as a front walk. After some brief discussion by the Boardmembers regarding drainage and steps, motion Boardmember Barhhart, second Boardmember Washburn to approve plans as submitted. 5-0. ADJOURNMENT With no further business, Motion Boardmember Barnhart, second Boardmember Washburn, the regular meeting of the Design Review Board adjourned at 8:05. Duly approved 5-0. Approved: -. Bernadette Thompson, Planning Commission Secretary W. Steed Chairman -- MINUTE RECORD OF HELD ON THE LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION 7th DAY OF PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Chairman Steed, 7:34 P.M. April 1981 ROLL CALL FOUND Commissioners: Kempe, Dominguez" Barnhart, Washburn and Chairman Steed. - MINUTE ACTION Also present were Jim Morrissey, Planning Director and Councilman Unsworth. Motion Commissioner Barnhart, seconded Commissioner Washburn to approve minutes of March 3, as submitted. Motion Commissioner Dominguez, seconded Commissioner Barnhart to approve minutes of March 17, as submitted. PUBLIC HEARING Chairman Steed opened Public Hearing at 7:40. 1. Tentative Parcel Map #17240 - Located easterly of the intersection of Marshall Avenue and Gunder Avenue. A Lot split dividing one lot into two lots. Staff gave history stating the applicant was dividing 2.6 acres into two lots of .9 and 1.7 acres and further that an environmental review had been conducted. Staff also indicated that the surrounding use is R-1. Staff recommended approval of Parcel Map 17240 subject to the following conditions: Provide for 20 ft. half-street. 1. 2. ,,-. 3. 4. 5. 6. At building permit stage, construct improvements along the frontage of both lots to include: a. Curb and gutter 18 feet from street centerline. b. Standard roadway between new curb and street centerline. Comply with the requirements of Subdivision Map Act and City's Ordinance No. 529. All improvements to be designed by owners civil engineer to the specifications of the city. Obtain necessary clearance from the Regional Water Quality Control Board for individual subsurface disposal system. Provide the City with a letter of water availability from Elsinore Water District. 7. Project shall conform to the Uniform Fire Code Section 13.301. 8. Provide a standard super-hydrant to allow a potential fire flow of 2500 psi, as required by the Riverside County Fire Department, at the intersection of Gunder Avenue and Mc Phearson Circle replacing the existing wharf hydrant. 9. Finding of no significiant impact upon the environment. 10. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. At this point Chairman Steed asked was there anyone in the audience that would like to speak in favor. Jack Ackerman introduced himself as the applicant and stated that he understood and agreed with the recommendation of Staff. Chairman Steed then asked again if there was anyone in favor/opposition, there being none the Public Hearing was closed at 7:39. There were no questions by the Commissioners and motion was made to approve TM 17204 subject to the conditions, ~9 significant impact on the environmental ana issuance of a Negative ';, Declaration, Commissioner Washburn, seconded Commissioner Barnhart. Duly approved 5-0. , ~ Minutes April 7, 1981 Page 2 .2 . fl1entative I~il~~~n #17 4J~ - Chairman St~ed opened Public Hearing -at :a~'p.. - Northerly of Railroad Canyon Road, easterly of the community of Canyon Lake Southerly of Greenwald Avenue involving approximately 530 acres. A Subdivision of 614 Lots known as the Canyon Lake Hills Annexatiol} , area Annexations No. 24 & 25. Staff gave history of the project bringing out the fact that the development had been accepted through the use of a Development Agreement, herewith enclosed in June of 1980 and annexed into the city in mid-fall of last year. Subject to the following conditions: 1. To build no more than two thousand living units. 2. To maintain the streets within the one thousand acre site which shall remain private streets so long as said streets remain private streets, said maintenance to be through a homeowners' association. . . 3. To dedicate to the City one (1) acre for a future fire station site. . . (On the northern portion). 4. To offer to dedicate a suitable site to the Elsinore Union School District for school purposes upon terms and conditions agreed upon between Developer and District, said dedication not to exceed eleven (11) acres. 5. All development and design standards will be consistent with city ordinances and codes enforced at the time the agreement becomes effective. 6. Thirty five percent (35%) of the 1000 acres shall remain as open space. Staff stated that the project design has changed and brings it into conformance with the General Plan Amendement, nevertheless there was some concern in the number of areas, by staff which the applicant in order to cooperate with staff has submitted a hydrology report and will provide additional access to the city from the north. Staff further expressed concern with road widths, length of cul-de-sacs, ~ adequate sewage disposal, non-accessibility to the majority of population and open spnce zoning. Staff recommended approval of TTM -~ 17413 subject to the stated conditions. Staff made reference to the illustrative map on the board dividing the lot~ and a letter that was submitted by the applicant stating requesting a change in ~ome of the conditions which staff then passed out. Stafffurtlier elaborated on the map with emphasis on the difference of ingress/egress, density and other changes as addressed in the conditions of approval. In favor was Wesley Hylen, Manager of Boyle Engineers, in representation of the owner. He stated that he would like to review the comments which had been submitted to staff in order of number. After some discussion and modifications by both staff and Commissioners. Chairman Steed asked if there was anyone in favor/opposed. A member of the audience, who introduced himself as Ron Garcia, an adjacent property owner, stating that he was not either in favor or in opposition, inquired as to there being no access to his property after the construction. After a statement from the City Engineer, Joe Kicak and more comments from the Commissioners, the public hearing was closed. Motion Commissioner Barnhart to accept Tentative Tract Map #17413 subject to the following conditions with amendments to items If, 4b, 4c, 5, 11, 12, 13, 18, 20 & 26 as included below., second Commissioner Washburn. 1. "A" Street - a. b. / c. d. e. f. Dedicate to provide of 88' of right of way. Install curb and gutter 32' from street centerline. Construct standard roadway between new curbs. (TT-7.S) Construct same width access road to Railroad Canyon Road from buundary of the subdivision. Provide right of way for access road of a minimum width of 68' . Construct bridge crossing at San Jacinto River on "A" Street in accordance with State Highway Standards. Minutes April 7, 1981 Page 3 - 2. Railroad Canyon Road a. Obtain the necessary rights of way from the junction of "A" Street with Railroad Canyon to provide for 4 lanes (2 in each direction) of traffic, each lane 12 feet wide and an 8 foot shoulder on each side. Right-of-way shall be obtained to point southerly to join the fight-of-way provided by Cal- Trans in conjuntion with I-IS construction and relocation of the Railroad Canyon Road. r b. Use Riverside County Standard #100 and coordinate improvements wi th the City Engineer. (TI=7. 5) 3. "B", "C", and "Y" Streets ( as shown on T.T.M. 17413) a. Dedicate to provide for 66 feet of right-of-way. b. Installcurb and gutter 22 feet from street centerline. c. Con,struct standard roadway between new curbs. 4. All other local streets. a. Dedicate for 60 feet of right-of-way. b. Install curb and gutter 18 feet from street centerline. c. Construct standard roadway between new curb. - 5. Install standard sidewalk on one side only in accordance with Riverside County Ordinance 493. Sidewalk location plan will be approved by City Council prior to preparation of final improve- ment plans. 6. Pay for the installation of street name signs. The cost of said street name signs to be determined prior to the required installa- tion. I" 7. Install or arrange with Southern California Edison Company to have installed ornamental street lights. 8. Provide adequate drainage f~ilities. 9. Show proof that the necessary sewage treatment facilities will be available, prior to issuance of building permits or request and receive clearance from the Regional Water Quality Control Board for other means of sewage disposal. 10. Provide proof that the water 'supply will be available to each and every parcel, and that the necessary water system to supply said tract will be constructed prior to issuance of building permits. 11. Acceptance of Exhibit "A" to indicate new street and cul-de-sac allignment. 12. 13. ,t-- , 14. 15. 16. Provide alternate all weather access. All improvements to be de~igned by owner's civil engineer to the specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore. Meet all requirements of General Telephone Company. Meet all requirements of Southern California Edison Company. Provide full modification or fire resistant plants for a buffer zone around south and west property lines. 17. Provide the following fire protection. a. Water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 2500 gpm. b. Fire hydrants shall be located at each street intersection, if possible, but in no event shall there be an interval of more than 300 feet between hydrants in multiple-family zones and 600 feet between hydrants in single-family zones. ;J" Minutes April 7, 1981 Page 4 c. The requirements of the city shall be enforced with the planning and design criteria to be approved by the Riverside County Fire Department. d. Conform to Riverside County Uniform Fire Code Sec. 13~301. - /' 18. Dedicate to city a 40 acre park site as addressed in developers agreement, specifically lot 613 with public access to that lot. 19. Pay all applicable fees. 20. CC & Rls and Homeowners Management Association Rules and Regulations shall be submitted to the Planning Department to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and City Attorney. The CC & Rls shall provi~e that if the property is not maintained in the condition requued by the CC & R IS, then the city after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the area and perform at the Homeowners Management Association expense, the necessary maintenance. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the city to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. 21. Finding of no significant impaet on the environment. 22. Reaffirm applicability of EIR previoulsy submitted. 23. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. 24. All streets within gated area of the cojmunity shall be dedicated but not accepted for maintenance. Streets not in gated area shall be dedicated and accepted for maintenance (reference la, 3a, 4a) Duly approved as amended 5-0. I'" ......1 3. Conditional Use Permit 81-4 - Mobilehome office from which to operate proposed Hoverpark. South-easterly of the intersection of Lucerne Street and Lakeshore Drive. Staff gave history stating that the applicant isproposing a Hoverpark on this property for which staff is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the use of the mobilehome on the property. Staff stated that this type of park uses small rubber vheicles which fly on a cusion of air, utilizing the same concept of propulsion as hydrofoil. The applicant has submitted information regarding the type of vehicle to be used and the use as it appears. Staff further explained that the applicant proposes a park in the recreational (1265 Mean Sea Level), but there can be no operation without the trailer. Staff explained that since R-1 zoning starts at the 1265 level, it is not advisable to allow a use to remain near a residential area which could generate substantial noise, therefore, it is recommended that the use not be allowed to start above the 1260 MSL, moving the Hoverpark 150 ft. from the 1265 MSL Line leaving 500 fet of usable land. Staff also brought out that the applicant will be able to use the park whether the lake is stabliied or not becuase the park utilizes water. Also that if it is reviewed as an entity, conformance with the General Plan will be a problem with respect to zoning and non-conformance with zoning, therefore staff is recommending that the mobilehome and parking be placed in C-1 zoning. Staff further explained that the CUP must be in conformance with the General Plan, the intent being to find a medium between the zoning and the intent of the use. Staff recommended approval subject to stated conditions 1 thru 8 with the addition of #9 which affects the location of the fence. Chairman Steed opened the Public Hearing at 9:10 and asked applicant would she care to speak. Applicant introduced herself as Pamela Kemp for her husband who was out of town. She asked to see the changes of location at which time staff drew the changes on the board illustrating the original location and the recommended location. Chairman questioned spetic use. It was also brought out that this was not a permanent office and would be subject to a 1 year review. The applicant asked what is allowed between C-1 area and R-1 area. Staff further explained uses in designated zones together with what is allowable without zone change. / j Minutes April 7, 1981 Page 5 ". Commission brought up the idea of a variance and picnic tables. Staff explained that a variance is for prQPosed uses not designated land uses. Applicant asked what to do to have picnic area. Staff gave some explanations and options to do this. Staff stated that he would get with the City Attorney and get together a report regarding the variance from one use to another. Applicant stated she would like to make the whole thing a unit with a picnic area included. The main concern being Variance on lower piece of property, recreational use between commercial and recreational designated area and a fenced area. The Commission then decided to table CUP 81-4 until next meeting, being the 21st. In summary Chairman Steed stated that the intent be that the mobilehome be put in the C-1 zone and placed vertical, in line with the long line of the property rather than abutting out, and that the security fence not the stqnage area remain down in that area with a variance from C-1 to Recreation to have control of traffic coming through the Hovercraft out to the operating area. Motion Commissioner Dominguez, second Commissioner Washburn to table until next meeting. 5-0. 4. Conditional Use Permit 81-5 - Homeowner Tool and Equipment Rental and Sales Yard with Portable Concrete Mixer. Located northwesterly of Walnut Drive and Fraser Drive. Staff gave history stating that the applicant proposes an implement sales yard with a portable cement mixer and that the reason staff is asking for CUP is that one of the uses is not allowed. The sales yard portion is allowed within the C-2 district and CP but the manufacturing of concrete only in an M-2 District. One of the main reasons for the CUP is the amount of concrete to be produced. Staff believed one problem to be the noise and has recommended a structure to screen the use. Staff indicated that he has gone out to observe the equipment and the noise and therefore recommends approval subject to stated conditions. The Public Hearing was closed at 9:37. In ~ favor was Albert Wilsey the applicant who represent.ed U""cart system for homeowners used used throughout the United States. He stated that the nearest operation of this type is in Norco. Applicant further explained the set and procedure of this operation and made reference to some additional material he had brought with comments of Planning Directors throughout the United States, of which he both passed out and quoted a couple of the comments. There were questions regarding the dust. Further conversation in sued with regard to pictures of the machine, problems and resolutions to the problems, and to the location of the operation. In favor from the audience was a John Dexter, contractor who stated that he felt that this operation would be an asset to both the con- tractors and the homeowners. There was no opposition from the audience, nevertheless as a matter of record, received through the mail from Don Summers of Elsinore via his attorney David J. Huarte there was a message stating that this type of use would hurt a property owner in the area (reference Parcel # 379-230- 006-008-009. Public Hearing was closed at 9:49 P.M. Motion Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Washburn to approve CUP 81-5 sub.ject to the following conditions: 1. -., 2. / 3. 4. 5. 6. The applicant produces not more than 3 cubic yards of concrete per day. The proposed wall is constructed to alleviate the noise and visual effects of the use. The applicant be subject to a check by the Planning Commission one year from the time of City Council approval. The project is found to be in conformance with the General Plan. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. Issuance of a negative declaration. _ __~J ~ " ;:..; ) -.. " Minutes April 7 , 19B1 Page 6 BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Lot Line Adjustment 81-3 - Northwesterly of the intersection of Railroad Canyon Road and Highway 71/1-15. Staff gave history stating that applicant proposes an enlargement of one parcel adjacent "old Railroad Canyon Road" which is part of Zone change 81-1 from R-l to CPo The lot line adjustment will extend the existing parcel halfway into the public right-of-way with a request to vacate this portion of "old Railroad Canyon Road" to be reviewed by the City Council. Staff recommended approval subject to stated Conditions. There were no questions from the Commission and motion was made by Commissioner Dominquez, second Commissioner Washburn to approve Lot Line Adjustment 81-3 subject to the following conditions: 1. The City Council approve the vacation of this portion of Railroad Canyon Road. 2. The legal description for the change of zone for the parcel in question shall extend half-way into the public right-of way. 3. A legal description is submitted designating the lots as shown on the application. 4. A Record of Survey is submitted as required by state law identifying all proposed lots as presented and identified by legal description to be submitted in condition #3. 5. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 6. Issuance of a negative declaration. Duly approved 5-0. 2. Lot Line Adjustment 81-4- Northeasterly of the intersection of Railroad Canyon Road and Highway 71/1-15. Staff gave history stating that applicant proposes a lot line adjustment to change the size of six (6) existing lots to create five (5) new lots of a more useable size. Three (3) of the new lots were contained in Zone Change 81-1 and the two (2) remaining ones in Zone Change 80-4. At the time of the Zone Change 80-4, the applicant indicated an office building was proposed on a portion of the property. Staff recommended approval subject to stated conditions with an additional condit~dn stating payment of adequate fees ., be paid since additional fees are required to process this application. Chairman Steed asked the applicant if he was aware of the additional fees. Applicant stated that he was aware, but will follow the advise of the City Attorney to which he has corresponded. There were no comments from the Commission, motion Commissioner Washburn, Second Barnhart to approve LLA 81-4 subject to the following conditions: 1. A legal description is submitted designating the lots as shown on the application. 2. A Record of Survey is submitted as r.equired, by state law identifying all proposed lots as presented and identified by the legal description to be submitted in condition #1. 3. A finding of no significant impact upon the environement. 4. Issuance of a negative declaration. 5. Payment of adequate fees. Duly approved 5-0. 3. Waiver of Parcel Ma Requirements - Southeasterly of the intersection o a e sore Drlve an aln treet. Staff stated that applicant has submitted a letter to staff expressing a desire to waive the requirements fora parcel map due to the fact that the applicant is attempting to obtain right-of-way from Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company. The company is requiring applicant to submit evidence that the city has waived the require- ment of a parcel map as outlined in the Subdivision Map Act or that a parcel map was submitted and approved by the city. The Railroad references Ordinance 529 of the Subdivision Map Act. Staff also made reference to 2 conditions of a parcel map. Staff then stated to the Commission the 2 actions that can be taken. Staff recommended approval subject to stated actions being taken ...J Minutes April 7, 1981 Page 7 ,/' by the applicant. At this time applicant Abe Liss introduced himself stating his confusion as to what the actual problem is. Staff in answer to this question stated that at any time land TItS cenhveyed from a bpul ie entity to. an indidual ,the . local jurisdiction has to issue this waiver. There was more discussion as to the nesscessity of these conditions which was clearified by Commissioner Barnhart who explained that the 10 feet would have to be dedicated to the city for the waiver, through a Grant Deed. There being no further questions motion, Commissioner Dominquez, second Commissioner Barnhart to approve the request to waive parcel map requirements, subject to the applicant granting 10 feet of the parcel adjacent Lakeshore Drive to the city and submitting a grant deed or quitclaim deed to an escrow company to process and check the legal description before issuance of a letter waiving the parcel map requirements. Duly approved 5-0. /~ 4. Ordinances for Mobilehomes - Staff stated that at the last meeting the Commission requested additional information regarding mobile- homes together with a plan of attack to develop an ordinance before July 1, 1981. Staff made~; reference to attached memo listing the requirements of SB 1960 and methods a local entity can impose that would be compatible with this law. Staff discussed the requirement of a CUP and the time element involved and the problem of economic find~for such a procedure. After some discussion by staff and Commission staff recommended Commission adopt an ordinance with stated provisions. There were comments by Commissioner Barnhart based on the meeting she attended. There were some other comments from commissioners with explanations from staff in various areas that would be affeoted;the. intent of the bill and other signi- ficant aspects of a mobilehome,not common to single-family residences. Extensive discussion insued with reference to appearance. The roof pitch was discussed and Des ign Board approval was suggested., After further discussion it was motioned Commissioner Barnhaxt, second Commissioner Washburn that staff dra.w up an ordinance to be reviewed by the Commission at the next meeting. Approved 5"",0... Chairman Steed suggested at this point the Commission adjourn to Design Review Board, being that it was very short. 10:45 P.M. Chairman Steed reopened the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission at 1Q:.51 P.M. at which time Informatoinal items were addressed. INFORMATIONAL 1. City Council Minutes There were none to review. 2. Planning Director's Report - Planning Director Morrissey stated that he did not have any items to bring to the Commission at this time. 3. Commissioners Reports & Recommendations ~ The Commissioners inquired with regard to a couple of items that were brought up at the last meeting and their status and there were no new recommendations or reports addressed at this time. There being no further business, motion Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Kempe to adjourn the regular meeting of the Lake Elsinore -. Planning Commission. 11:03 / Respectfully submitted, Approved, Bernadette Thompson Planning Commission Secretary W. Steed Chairman .li, MINUTE RECORD OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD ON THE 7th DAY OF April 1981 MINUTE ACTION Minutes of March 17, 1981 were approved as submitted, Motion Boardmember Barnhart, second Boardmenber Washburn. PLANS FOR CONSIDERATION --- ~ 1. 113 Sulphur - Commercial Building - Phil Reed - Staff gave history of this project stating that this is the third time that this building has come before the Board, but has now come with an altogether different design. Staff stated that the ingress and egress had to be changed to conform to the present one-way alley and 3 foot set back from the northerly property line to provide landscaping was necessary. Staff stated that the structure had been revised with swirl stucco and rough sawn siding. Staff recommended approval subject to the applicant revising the parking area to provide for landscaping and two eleven foot parking spaces required. The Boardmembers made some comments with regard to the structure and parking and with no further comments motion was made by Boardmember Barnhart, second Boardmember Washburn to accept staff recommendation as submitted. There being no further business, the regular meeting of the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board adjourned, Motion Boardember Barnhart second Boardmember Washburn. 10:50 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Approved, J,Q-. ~ Bernadette Thompson Planning Commission Secretary w. Steed -;1. / Minutes of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Held on the 21st DAY OF April 1981 Pledge of Allegiance was led by Planning Director Morrissey, 7:38 P.M. ROLL CALL FOUND Commissioners: Kempe, Dominguez, Barnhart, Washburn and Chairman Steed. Also present were Jim Morrissey, Planning Director and Councilman Unsworth. /' PUBLIC HEARINGS -. Chairman Steed opened Public Hearing at 7:40 P.M. 1. Conditional Use Permit 81-4 (continuation) Mobilehome office from which to operate proposed Hoverpark, located Southeasterly of the intersection of Lucerne Street and Lakeshore Drive. Raymond Kemp introduced himself as president of Hovercraft Inc., the applicant. Mr. Kemp stated that he found the arrangement as to the location of facilities at his site easy enough to do, and that his main concern was not the location of the Mobile- home, it could really be placed anyplace. He would just like to get started as soon as possible. He stated that the reccom- mendations of staff per memorandum were totally acceptable, but did question 1265 MSL vs. 1270. Staff explained that the 1270 line is for residential and 1265 for recreational. Chairman Steed inquired as to portable toilets. Mr. Kemp stated that he would be on septic since he is not on the city sewer. Chairman Steed then questioned the leach field in that area with regard to flooding. Staff indicated in answer to this question that the mobilehome was near Lakeshore Drive and there is no problem with this site. Mr. Kemp inquired as to the present zoning of R-l being a problem in the future if he proposed any additions, which Chairman Steed advised that this problem should be addressed at a later date. It was also stated that the Hovercraft would stay in the boundaries of the fence together with grass and track having pylons or bay~h~les and maintenance would be at night with a truck. Mr. Kemp further explained that the control of the Hoverpark would be based on access to the area being governed by an individual being in the possession of a Hovercraft pilot license and I.D. card, with the public viewing area being outside of the fenced line. There was discussion as to #6 of the conditions "No picnic eating facilities shall be allowed". Commissioner Washburn stated that he did not see how an eating area could be detrimental or hazardous to the city. The Commission had further dis~us~i0n as to additi6nal conditions of approval, additions and deletions. There being no one in favor/opposition, the Public Hearing was closed at 7:55 P.M. Commissioner Dominquez stated that he felt that the 1 year review period should be 6 months. The Commission was in agreement that hours of operation should be 8:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. With no further comments from the Commissioners, motion Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Washburn to approve Conditional Use Permit 81-4 subject to the following conditions: 1. Adequate sewage disposal be attained. 2. Submittal of a parking plan to the Planning Director for approval. 3. The permit be reviewed in 6 months from the start of the operation. 4. The Hoverpark start at an elevation no higher than 1260 MSL. 5. The mobilehome office be placed within the commercially zoned area of the property. 6. Fenced storage area shall be placed at or below 1265 MSL. 7. The Residential area shall be landscaped. 8. A finding of no significant impact upon the environ- ment. 9. Issuance of a negative declaration. / r Minutes Planning Commission April 21, 1981 Page 2 10. Conformance with the General Plan. 11. Dust mitigation be established by the owner. 12. Hours of operation commence at 8:00 A.M., ending at 8:00 P.M. Duly approved 5-0. BUSINESS MATTERS , -. 1. Industrial Building - located at 29170 Riverside Drive. Staff gave history stating that applicant is proposing a 12,000 sq. ft. building to manufacture furniture to be enclosed within a steel structure, with 25 parking spaces. Staff indicated additional information is needed to justify parking spaces. At this time David Kingsboro introduced himself as the applicant and made comments as to the structure being on beams and the fact that parking could be cut down. Mr. Kingsboro further advised the Commission that the use would be manufacturing of novelties as opposed to furniture. He stated that his proposal is based on Box Spring guidelines where the same type of operation has been conducted. Commission expressed concern as to where excess scrape and debris would be kept and the type of sign that would be used. Mr. Kingsboro indicated that these type operations are kept very clean as can be evidenced by the owners other operation and that since the business is basically wholesale, only a small sign would be used. The Commission brought out that as an additional condition, that the outside could not be used for storage unless screened and that scrape facilities sho~ld be provided. Discussion was held with regard to Surbuban Air fencing or suitable wall strucutre to used as a screen. There being no further comments, motion Commissioner Washburn, second Commissioner Barnhart to approve Industrial Building subject to the following conditions, inclusi~e of additions and deletions. / 9. - 10. ,.. II. 12. 13. 1. One-half street improvements be provided with curb placed 18 feet from street center-line (standard 105(a)). 2. Sidewalks be provided. (standard 401). 3. Provide minimum driveway of 20 foot width. (standard 207) 4. Sewage disposal be approved by the Regional Water Quality Board. 5. All requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department be met. 6. Provide street lights as required by Edison. (standard 1000) 7. Indicate by map and note all sheet flow flooding. (Xone B) 8. Grading plan shall show: a. Distances b. Contours c. Quantity of cut and fill. All work shall be completed in accordance with the City Engineer and the Uniform Building Code. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. Issuance of a negative declaration. Suburban Air fence or suitable wall structure encompassing east ~torage area shall be established. Screened trash Area. Duly approved 5-0. Minutes Planning Commission April 21, 1981 Page 3 2. Commercial Building - Located in Stater Brothers Shopping Center. Northwesterly of the intersection of Lakeshore Drive and Riverside Drive. Staff gave history stating that the applicant is proposing a 9600 sq. ft. Commercial Building next to the Stater Brothers Market, which has been finalized and reviewed. Staff also stated that the fire department recommendations had been received but not passed out, nevertheless all conditions have been met. Staff recommended approval subject to stated conditions. After a brief question and no objections to the proposed project, motion Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Washburn to approve Commercial Building subject to the following conditions: 1. All requirements of County Fire Department be met. 2. All conditions of the Building Department be met. 3. finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 4. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. -. 3. Mobilehome Ordinance - Staff stated that 2 ordinances had been written with regard to mobilehomes, one of which incorporates items from the last meeting and the other which refers to the attached memorandum. Chairman Steed expressed his disatisfaction with the drip system. Staff stated that he would like to go through the ordinance during which time he added an item #G and amended other items of the ordinanne There was some discussion as to whether or not mobilehomes would be before Design Review Board and buildings and whether building depart- ment standards would be met. There was more discussion as to the purpose of Design Review Board; affect on staff workload:and the fact that single-family residences will be coming back to Design Review Board. After more discussion and additions to the ordinances, it was decided by the Commission that since the 2 ordinances are somewhat alike, staff should combine the two into one resolution withdeleti6ns and additions as follows, moti6n Commissioner Dominguez, second Commissioner Kempe. 17.14.20 "Establishing Mobilehomes and/or Manufactured Homes" instead of "Establish1ng Mobilehomes". 17.14.30 (b) "All single-family dwellings shall be required to have a roof overhang of at least 6 inches on the long sides." instead of " . . . front and rear roof overhang of at least 16 inches." 17.14.30 - (g) The National Manuractured Housing Construction and Safety Santdards Act of 1974 shall be used to govern the construction, design and performance of manu- factured homes or mobilehomes built in the United States since June 15, 1976. 17.14.30 (e) ". . . Board. . ." instead of " Director . . ." presented to the Design Review . presented to the Planning /' The exemption of single-family residences coming before Design Review Board is eleminated and will be incorporated in the new resolution. Duly Approved 5-0. 4. Trees After review of the list of county trees and the trees presently being suggested ty the Lake Elsinroe Planning Department,it~as agreed that the County List would be the accepted list. Motion Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Washburn to adjourn to Design Review 8:57 and return to Planning Commission, being the Design Review was so short. Minutes Planning Commission Page 4 INFORMATIONAL Chairman Steed reopened the Planning Commission meeting at 9:07. /' 1. PLANNING DIRECTORS REPORT- Planning Director Morrissey made reports and comments on the following items: 1. Joint meeting with Council and Planning Commission'& Staff, set for the previous evening was canceled and would beset for a later date. Commissioner Washburn suggested that it be held before the resignation of the present City Manager R. B. Pace who will be leaving on May 1, 1981. Staff stated it might be a problem but attempts would be made to schedule the meeting before this time. This was carried in the form of a motion by Commissioner Washburn, second Commissioner Barnhart. 5~0. 2. Meeting of May 5, 1981 will have to be rescheduled due to the Re-call being on this date. Staff suggested the next day which would be May 6th. Chairman Steed suggested that if the agenda is not too heavy for that date that the meeting be posponed completely and the regular meeting ot the Planning Commission/Design Review Board be held on the 19th. This arrangement being agreeable with the other Commissioners motion was made by Chairman Steed. Duly approved 5-0. 3. Planning Commissioners Conference will be held on May 14th in San Bernardino. Topic "Affordable Housing. Staff expressed that it would be advantageous to the Commissioners. and asked that anyone interested notify the:Planning Depart- ment so that arrangements could be made for all attending. 4. A City Council adjourned meeting was held to take action with regard to selection of a consultant for the RFP. There were 25 applicants out of which proposals (draft) were accepted from 7 ending up in the selection ot 1 that being Donald A. Cotton and Associates. 5. The Chairman of Redevelopment and Staff have a Draft Redevelopment Plan 6. EDC - Industrial standard. 7. Revising Zones - Move C-1 to C-2 - C~1 & C-2 Industrial Zone showing. 8. There has been partial 701 reimbursement. 9. EVMWD - If developed, financed and builded will gIve a will serve letter. 10. Street layout for the west end of the city granted (Lakeshore /Machado) ,. 11. Size of Neighborhood parks. 12. Urban Development action grant was before the Council. 13. Open Space to conform (1 unit for every 2 acres). 14. Sewer Treatment plant will be before Cioucil in a month or so. 15. Housing element guidelines with an issuance 16. Buchanan Project - CDC - liibility to obtain funds AB 333. Too much of a liability. / Minutes Planning Commission Page 5 17. Rehabilitation of residences in the area of Chaney and Lindsey. 18. Social needs assessment book copy of which is shown will be incorporated into the General Plan. Commissioner Washburn asked if a copy could be made for each of the Commissioners. 19. Master Plan Proposal Council took action - Sumner to expand near Lakeshore. 20. Request for a motion that if item is not listed as a designated use there be a resoltuionfrom Planning Department based on the fact that it is not detrimental, i.e. Antique Shops. Staff asked Commission what action they wanted taken in these instances. Discussion in sued with regard to reapplying for a business licenses, amendments to existing ordinances, expanding uses in ordinances and allowing the Planning Director to use good judgment. It was decided that a resolution should be formulated, Motion Commisisoner Washburn, second Commissioner Kempe. Duly approved 5-0. COMMISSIONERS REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Commissioner Kempe inquired regarding letter concerning Country Club Heights. Staff stated it would be at the next meeting. There was then discussion on the Trafflc on Riverside, and the possibility of a traffic count being taken by Cal Trans. Commissioner Dominguez inquired as to whether or not the light poles on Riverside Dr. and on Chaney & Davis had been looked into. Staff replied that a request was sent to departments. There being no further business, motion Commissioner Washburn, second Commissioner Barnhart, the Regular meeting of the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Approved: Bernadette Thompson, Planning Commission Secertary W. Steed Chairman ~ MINTITE RECORD OF HELD ON TIlE LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING C(M.fiSSION 19th MAY 1981 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Planning Director Morrissey, 7: 32 P.M. ROLL CALL FOUND Commissioners: Kempe, Dominguez, Barnhart, Washburn and Chairman Steed. Also present were Planning Director Morrissey, and Councilman Unsworth. - MINTITE ACTION I' Minutes of April 7, 1981 tabled until next meeting, Motion Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Kempe to action minutes of April 21, 1981 as submitted. BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Geographic Base File and Dual Independent Map Encoding System (GBF/DIME) - Staff related to Commission, the item was brought up at the request of the Commission that the city should look into the type of program proposed by the County, therefore staff has brought in Mark Balis, Supervising Planner, in charge of the Development Monitor Section that deals with the administration of GBF/DIME. Mr. Balis explained that his purpose is to cover the program in Riverside and how it can be used in Elsinore. He then passed out a booklet to further describe and define the program and a map to showing the areas that the program is being used now, where it is proposed and where it is almost completed. Mr. Balis explained in his definition of GBF/DIME that Geographic Base File (GBF) is basically a street map in a form that can be used by a computer. It contains local addresses, street names, intersections, zip codes, census codes and blocks and can contain other information. Mr. Balis made reference to the map' that he brought with him explaining what this map covered. Next Dual Independent Map Encoding (DIME) represents map features numerically so that they can be processed by the comupter. He explained a Node Point to be a point on the map where streets intersect or other features on the map where features intersect or cross. The dual part of the map means that the file is created by coding two separate sets of information. Mr. Balis further explained the line segments and how you can obtain information for various areas. Mr. Balis stated that the map represented the status of the program in the County to date. The Western area (Riverside, Corona, Norco, Edgement and Sunnymead) has a completed Dime File; the Eastern area being the Cochella Valley area is partially completed; the Central portion being Hemet San Jacinto area is an area that ADC funding is being sought which will not be definite until July 1. Mr. Balis further expressed that the Planning filed has undergone substantial changes in recent years, the scope of the City Manager, Planning Departments, Planning Commissioners and others has changed, therefore making cormmmity data important. GBF/DIME provides the link on a geographical basis. The program can take Administrative data and sort it into units you wish to use. i.e. population in the area not in conformance with boundaries of any particular unit. With GBF/DIME you can callout street segments and not have to estimate as in the past. Chariman Steed questioned the inconsistency of the street numbering in Elsinore as an effect on this system, to which it was explained that the nuinher node would eliminate this probelm and how it was originally put into the computer would be the solution to this problem. Mr. Balis made further reference to some of the present uses of the system in Riverside, - i. e. Dispact for police and fire departments. Mr. Balis further stated that in the next 4-5 years the Riverside police could look up the location by computer and dispatch could relay the address and the closest cross streets which would appear on a screen. The system would be very effective in many emergency situations. Mr. Balis referred to census being taken on the system and passed out booklets relating to Dime systems being used in other states and counties. Commissioner Barnhart inquired as to whether or not the system could be used in the upcoming General Plan. There was further discussion as to the cost and advantages of the system and the possibility of buying into an existing system instead of buying a system. Chairman Steed stated that he would like to see staff look further into the system before it is presented to the Council with respect to the feasibility, cities now using the system and the cost. Councilman Unsworth suggested that there be no delay so that the Council could discuss it now so that it would not have to wait until next year. Motion Commissioner Washburn, second Commissioner Dominguez to have staff present the program to the Council as presented in this meeting. Approved 4-0. Commissioner Kempe abstained. - " Minutes May 19, 1981 Page 2 2. Street Widths for Cormtry Club Heights, Units 2 and 3 Staff stated that this item had been brought up 2-3 months ago and action was only on part of the area. Staff stated that a map has been enclosed outlining the area in question, the slope of the terrain and the amormt of buildable lots together with an overlay. Staff further explained the method used in the map to' display existing rmbuildable lots, Lots made rmbuildable by additional dedication, lots buildable after dedication,and street grades, with an overlay showing the direction and percentage of slopes. There was further discussion with regard to the right-of-way and Arcacia Street and its location, and bormdaries. Staff in answer to the Commissioners questions did an illustration to fMrther breakdown the presentation. After some discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Kempe, second Commissioner Barnhart that streets in Country Club Heights rmits 2 & 3 that are 60 ft., remain as they are and the ones that are 50 ft. remain and include a sidewalk without additional dedication and 40 ft right-of-way streets remain without sidewalks. . Mill Street westerly of Cormtry Club Blvd. should not have a requirement for sidewalks. 3. Mobilehome and/or Manufactured Home Ordinance - Staff stated that upon presentation of the Planning Commission recommendation to City Cormcil with regard to the mobilehome ordinance, there was some disagreement as to the intent of the ordinance and certain provisions that would make rmits equal. The roof pitch was one of the main issues. Additionally, there was some discussion in the Cormcil meeting with regard to the use of Design Review Board. The Commissioners made some comments with respect to the concern: of the City Council which was followed by a motion by Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Dominguez to leave the Commissions recommendation as previously presented, with adoption of the ordinance as originall proposed. Duly approved 5-0. 4. Compatible Uses - Staff expressed to the Planning Commission the problem of determining compatibility of uses due to the wording in the ordinances, i.e. the wording in C-l, C-2 and M-l "C. Other businesses or enterprises which in the opinion of the commision has been determined by resolution to be . . ." Staff further stated that he has devised a resolution which will allow the Planning Director to be able to determine the compatibility of uses within districts but that determination must be approved by the Commission therefore allowing business licenses to be signed by staff with the applicant being given notice that it IlUlSt be ratified by the Commission. After some discussion by the commission with regard to this resolution, motion was made by Commissioner Washburn to adopt resolution as submitted with a time limit of 6 months with which to revise the ordinance, second Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0. 5. Deposits Received for CUrb, Gutter & Sidewalks - Staff stated that this item had been brought to the Commission as the request of Commissioner Dominguez, to which staff has attached a list of names and addresse of people who have deposited money for future installation of improvements. The Commission made some comments with reference to the money paid and the status thereof. After a brief discussion on the topic a motion was made by Commissioner Washburn, seconded by Commissioner Barnhart to forward to City Council for there action. Approved 5 - o. INFORMATIONAL 1. Planning Directors Report- Staff as informational, spl!>ke on the status of the Draft EIR, Redevelopment Plan, Housing Element Package, Historical Survry and Appli- cation to the Department of Housing and Community Development. . 2. Planning Corrnnissioner Reports and Recorrnnendations - Corrnnissioner Dominguez expressed a desire that new employees of the city should be introduced to the Planning Commissioners. Commissioner Washburn made comments with regard to allocation of State Park monies. Commissioner Barnhart made reference to signs such as Office for Lease and the fact that local developers and builders do not hire local employees. Chairman Steed discussed Building on Graham owned by Dave Bulen. Commissioner Kempe made reference to a hole that is being filled in the middle of town. - / -- Minutes May 19'.,. 1981 Page 3 There being no further business, motion Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Washburn to adjourn to Design Review Board. 9:49 P.M. MINUTE RECORD OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD ON THE 19th DAY OF May 1981 MINUTE ACTION Minutes of April 21, 1981 tabled until next meeting. BUSINESS ITEMS .' 1. Trees for Commercial Project Staff gave exo1anation with reference to selection of trees for commercial project. BO~a discussed crieteria used in selection process. The matter was discussed and recommendation was to be submitted to the applicant as requested. MJtion Boardmember', Dominguez, second Boardmerilber Kempe. There being no further business, MJtion Boardmember Barnhart, second Boardmember Washburn, to adjourn the regular meeting of Lake Elsinore Design Review Board. Respectfully submitted, Approved: Bernadette Thompson Planning Commission Secretary W. Steed ,r--. -, RESOLUTION NO. 81-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE STATING ITS DESIRE TO HAVE THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING DETERMINE COMPATIBILITY OF USES WITHIN VARIOUS ZONING DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, Title 17, the zoning ordinance, states the Planning Commission shall determine the compatibility of uses within the C-l, C-2, and M-1 districts; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission desires not to slow the processing of permits, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has confidence that rational and equitable decisions will be made by the Planning Director and Planning Staff, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore as follows: ...~ ..a..... The Planning Director shall be allowed to determine the compatibility of uses when signing business licenses. This shall not undermine nor v6id the Planning Commissions respondibility in reviewing such permits. \('\1;.'"'- Adopted by the Planning Commission this _~ day of May, 1981. Whit Steed, Chairman ATTEST: -- ~~ BernaCtette T omps n, Planning Commission Secertary MINUTE RECORD OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION & ADJOURNED CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON THE 2nd DAY OF June 1981 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Chairman Steed, 7:34 P.M. ROLL CALL FOUND Commissioners: Kempe, Barnhart, Washburn and Chairman Steed. Absent: Commissioners Barnhart and Dominguez. ....... ~l Also present in regular attendance were Jim Morrissey, Planning Director and Councilman Unsworth. Chairman Steed recognized the presence of Mayor Stewart, Councilmen: Torn, Baldwin, and Unsworth. Joe Kicak, City Engineer, Florene Marshall City Clerk, Jim Blackford, Public Works, the Custodian, Paul Lew, Finance Director, Marian Elkin, Administrative Secretary, Helen School craft, Finance Secretary, Mr. Erlenborn with the Valley Tribune and other memebers of the General Public. Chairman Steed gave a formal introduction of the New City Manager Manuel Rede. MINUTE ACTION Motion Commissioner Kempe, second Commissioner Washburn to approve minutes of April 7, 1981 as submitted. Motion Commissioner Washburn, second Commissioner Kempe to approve the minutes of May 19, 1981 as submitted. Duly approved 3-0. BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Mobilehome/Manufactured Home Ordinance At this time Chairman Steed asked the Mayor if there was any input that he would like to make. It was suggested that the ~ Commissioners discuss the ordinance. Chairman Steed expressed that the Commission was satisfied with the ordinanc~_as it was written. The Council expressed that they did nave some changes and that a joint session be held with the City Council on this item. The joint session commencing at 7:40 P.M. Roll call was conducted by the City Clerk finding absent Councilman Harris. ,.. At this time Chairman Steed made reference to the handout received at this meeting and suggested that time be taken out to read it. Arrival was recognized for Commissioner Barnhart and Dominguez. Extensive discussion was held at this point with regard to roof pitch and compatibility. There was some concern as to whether with a roof pitch of 4 in 12, a mobilehome could be transported. The pitch of a conventional house was discussed. It was discussed as to whether this pitch would discriminate against mobilehomes. The Mayor stated the Building Department had taken a survey of homes built within the last 3 years and found most of the units were built with a 4 in 12 roof pitch. It was suggested that the ordinance be changed and see what problems arise. The idea of affordability was brought up and there was discussion on this issue together with siding, foundation and overhang. Mr. Kicak, City Engineer, upon request did an illustration of a 3 in 12 and 4 in 12 roof pticff followed by further discussion of the roof pitch. Councilman Baldwin brought in the Riverside County Ordinance in which he read portions to the Council and Commission with a suggestion that certain wording be used. After extensive discussion it was decided that the existing ordinance be amended to show 16" overhang on the long side, 4 and 12 for the roof pitch and a change of wording in "E" to read "materials & proposed plans". In addition it was decided that the processing of the Design Review Board be stream~ lined and that ail item "H" be added regarding 15 day appeals (this being taken from the Riverside County Ordinance). There being no further deletions or additions and a pole being taken of the Councilmen the joint session of the Commission & Council was adjourned at 9:15 P.M. Minutes June 2, 1981 Page 2 (Business Items Continued) .-. 2. General Plan Extension - Staff gave explanation of this item stating Staff has been working with the Office of Planning and Research to obtain an extension which will allow the city additional time to complete certain elements of the General Plan. Staff stated the city cannot amend the General Plan unless it is in redevelopment project area. Staff also stated that there should be a new General Plan within a year. There was discussion as to the effects on the city of this extension and how changes could be made. At this time the General Plan extension was tabled so that an announcement could be made by CouncilmanhUnSworth; .tbat being the announcement 'of the Publit Hearin~ for the Redevelop- ment Agency at Elsinore Elementary School for which announcements are being sent out to the project area residents setting the meeting for the 23rd. After this announcement the Commission resummed with the General Plan Extension. It was brought out that there was no action needed on this item it was more for discussion. ~~. 3. Three Story Structures - Staff gave history on this item explaining to the Commission concern with a 2 story dwelling area and a ground floor garage. There was some discussion with respect to this item and the danger of it being converted into a living area. Staff stated a policy or guideline was needed for this type of structure. Cahirman Steed expressed that this was advantageous with regard to the parking problem. Commissioner Dominguez stated that this was already a policy from a previous action taken by the Commission. There was further discussion with regard to building heights and future high tises irithe City of L~ke Elsinore. This item being for discussion the previous policy still stands with three story structures hi~ing garages on the floor level being in confor- man~e with ordinance. 4. Consistency of the Redevelopment Plan with the General Plan. Staff passed out a resolution regarding the conformity of the Redevelopment Plan with the General Plan, stating that the Redevelopment Plan had been adopted by the Planning Commission last year and that staff was not seeking a statement that the amended Redevelopment Plan is in conformance with the General Plan. Motion Commission Kempe, Second Commissioner Barnhart to adopt the resolution as written. INFORMATIONAL / PLANNING DIRECTORS REPORT - Staff has received approximately 1000 surveys which have been returned to the post office which is approximately 25% of the amount sent out. Some were sent to county residents within our sphere of influence. Staff is now correlating the returned questionnaires and is working out a format to use the SPSS system which allows different types of correlation. The loan application submitted by the City for the Community Development Cdrporation was approved by the state for approximately $50,000. The state is sending an agreement in which the city can request $7,500, or 15% of the loan application to be utilized for administrative purposes. The Industrial Ordinances will be reviewed on the 17th of this month by the CDC after which they will be forwarded to the Attorney and the conditions will be brought before the Commission and Council for review. Minutes Jiunec 2" 1 9-81 r.~~~" 3_' - PLANNING COMMISSIONERS REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS - Commissioner Kempe made reference to the houses near Elsinore Ready Mix which are still there, stating that a 6 month stay has become almost 2 years. Commissioner Washburn reported on a meeting he attended today with the County Board of Supervisors with reference to channel work. They were agreeable to the cities needs. The city is requesting $250,000 for channel work and $50,000 for preliminary engineering. Commissioner Washburn also requested the Planning Director meet witfi J~e Kicak, the City Engineer to review the Department of Watel. Resources Report. There being no further business, the regular meeting of the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission adjourned at 9;47 P.M. Motion Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Washburn. Respectfully submitted Approved: Bernadette Thompson Planning Commission Secretary W. Steed Chairman r- ,. MINUTE RECORD OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD ON THE 2nd DAY OF June. 1981 MINUTE ACTION Minutes of April 7, 1981, April 21, 1981 and May 19, 1981 approved as submitted, Motion Boardmember Barnhart, second Boardmember Washburn, with no additions or deletions. - BUSINESS ITEMS -- 1. Street names on TM 16000 and 14706 - Staff gave the names selected for the above mentioned tracts: TPM 16000 Workman Drive for the loop street within Tract and Garretson Lane and Dolly Drive in Tract 14706. Staff gave the reason for these names with a recommendation that that be approvaed as submitted. Councilman Unsworth brought up the fact that Workman goes both north and south and east and west and that some kind of distinction should be made. After some discussion, it was decided that it would be Workman Drive and Workman Lane with the determination of\which side would be designated east, west, north and south left up to the Planning Director. 2. Addition Determination - Staff gave history of this project stating that the OWller or the Olu 1I0tel Pizza Parlor is constructing a Gazebo in front of the structure. The structure being attached to the main st~ucture by a 2 X 4. The purpose of this item is to specify the type of projects the Board wishes to review. Staff further related that the structure is unchanged, but the appearance of the structure will be substantially altered. Staff suggested that a policy regarding additions of this type, that if elevations arc required by Board, they shall be reviewed and approved for compatibility with the main structure by the Planning Director; and Structural plans shoul~ ~e submitted to the city for review' by the Building Department. The Commission decided that these type structures should be reviewed on an individual basis and that no policy should be set, that there is no change in the structure and that the applicant should pull permits with a stetch plan with out the penality of Building Department having them tear the structure down. Motion Boardmembe'r Washburn, second Boardmember Barnhart to approve the the structure as submitted. Duly approve 5-0. There being no further business, the regular meeting of the Lake Elsinore Design Review Bvard adjourned, Motion Boardmember Barnhart, second Boardmember Kempe. 10:15 P.M. Respectfully submitted Approved: - Bernadette Thompson Planning Commissioner Secretary w. Steed RESOLUTION NO. 81-4 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT THE PRO- POSED RANCHO LAGUNA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT, AN AMEND- MENT TO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO: 1 CONFORMS TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AND TRANSMITTING ITS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. J' WHEREAS, before the Redevelopment Plan of the amended project area is submitted to the legislative body, it shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for its report and recommendation for con- formity to the General Plan for the City of Lake Elsinore; WHEREAS, the boundaries of the adopted project area are speci- fically described in the Redevelopment Plan; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has adopted a Preliminary Plan by resolution for the area herein specified; WHEREAS, a copy of the Redevelopment Plan hereto attached as Exhibit "A"; - " WHEREAS, This Commission has reviewed the Redevelopment Plan with particular regard to the Plan's conformity to the General Plan of the City of Lake Elsinore. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore as follows: 1. This Resolution shall constitute this Commission's report and recommendation to the City Council as required by the by the California Health and Safety Code Section 33346. 2. The Redevelopment Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is in conformance with the General Plan. :- 3. The Secretary of this Commission shall (a) certify to the adoption of this resolution, and (b) transmit a copy of this resolution to the City Council and to the Redevelopment Agency. Approved and Adopted this '2 day of Iv N~ , 1981. of ~~~~~~ er adette Thompson, Planning Commission Secretary .kv~ Plannlng ATTEST: MINUTE RECORD OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 16th DAY OF JUNE 1981 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Chairman Steed, 7:36 P.M. ROLL CALL FOUND Commissioners: Kempe, Dominguez, Barnhart, Washburn and Chairman Steed. Also present were Planning Director Morrissey and Councilman Unsworth. .r MI NUTE ACT I ON Minutes of June 2, 1981 approved as submitted, Motion Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Washburn. PUBLIC HEARING - " 1. Conditional Exception Permit 81-5 - Chairman Steed opened the public hearing at 7:33 P.M. giving location to be Northerwester1y corner of Riverside Drive and Lakeshore Drive. Staff gave history stating that the applicant is requesting approval of a 6.67 acre commercial project and variance from parking standards. The project proposing two separate retail structures withpotential for varying amounts of individual stores and two (2) restaurants and financial building. 396 parking spaces are required, nevertheless ingress and egress would be hampered by spaces adjacent driveway area. Therefore to mitigate traffic problems staff is recommending deleting some of the parking spaces adjacent the driveway on Lakeshore and Riverside Drives, with an increase of the driveway of 5 feet, moving the restaurant 5 feet to the south and eliminating the remaining two driveways to reduce circulation problems. Staff further stated that the unavailability of data to be provided by applicant will result in the Commission not being able to take action on the plot plan. Reference was to the illustration showing circulation and how the deletion would prevent back up on a local highway. Staff recommended approval of Conditional Exception 81-5 allowing 396 parking spaces, and tabling of plot plan approval due to lack of information and issuance of a negative declaration. The Commission commenced discussion of the project with questions relevant to the area. John Cowles, applicant brought in the revised plan showing the deletion of the parking spaces. Chairman Steed questioned the lack of entry for that size project and whether or not there would be a barrier for the gas station. Mr. Cowles stated that the developer has option to purchase the gas station in the future and showed an additional picture of the project with landscaping and physical appearance. Chairman Steed asked if there was anyone in favor. John Cowles again introduced himself further stating that a feasibility study had been done by the developer. Additionally in favor was Welma Swick of 30902 Riverside Drive who was very much in favor, but had concern with the installation of a traffic signal. Staff explained the procedure in this respect with Cal Trans. There being no one in opposition the Public Hearing was closed at 8:05. Motion Commissioner Kempe, second Commissioner Dominguez to accept staff recommendation as submitted. 5-0. " CONSENT CALENDAR r-- 1. Business License - Staff referred to previous memo on business license procedure whereby he will approve business license on a temporary basis and bring to Commission for final determination so as not to hold up the issuance of the business license to the applicant. After some comments from the Commission motion Commissioner Barnhart, Second Commissioner Washburn to approve issuance of Business License for Elsinore Sky Sails. Duly approved 5-0. Minutes of Planning Commission June 16, 1981 Page 2 BUSINESS ITEMS \~ 1. Sign Ordinance - Staff had no comments and referred discussion to Commissioner Dominguez upon whose request this item was agendized. Commissioner Dominguez expressed his concern with the section in the ordinance requiring the approval of a professional engineer for signs. It was brought out that this procedure was in accordance with the Uniform Building Code and had been passed by the Council. Chairman Steed elaborated on the hardships of finding an engineer. Commissioner Kempe suggested the possibility of the City Engineer doing the approvals, but it was established that someone else would still have to do the calculations. The City Manager suggested that 1) The building code be looked at as it related to the Sign Ordinance, 2) Specify the type of calculations that are needed and break down these requirements in better form, 3) Put burden on the property owner instead of shifting cost back to city government. After some further discussion with regard to this item it was decided that staff would research building codes and types of signs and bring back a recommendation to the Commission. Commissioner at this time made reference to the circumstances that were the underlying factor for bringing this item to the Commission and the reasons that he felt that something should be done. It was further stated that the guidelines might be followed too closer, nevertheless if there was a in-house problem the City Manager would take care of it. INFORMATIONAL Planning Directors Report - Staff reminded the Commission that the Redevelopment Public Hearing would be held in one week at 7:30 P.M. and that the site had been changed in order to have more room. The money for the city eventually to go to the -~ Community Development Corporation will be obtained earlier once the documents are signed by the Mayor. The Draft Housing Element will be sent out in approximately two weeks. The work on the Master Environmental and General Plan has started. The Industrial Ordinance will be coming up tomorrow night and will come before the Commission around the first of next month. The parking ordinance has been revised and will come before the Commission at the first meeting of next month. The Mobilehome Ordinance is in the packet. A meeting will take place in the Council Chambers at 10 A.M. by a fiscal review committee made up of various affected agencies in the county with regard to determining the type of impact a redevelop- ment freeze will have on the city. ,..... Commissioners Reports and Recommendations Commissioner Barnhart commented on the houses which have been possibly moved. Commissioner Washburn requested that a boat which has been parked on Main Street be sited by the Code Enforcement officer. Commissioner Dominguez commented on fences on Lakeshore Drive. Commissioner Kempe commented on the drip system and the possiblity of a sprinkler and the variation on the 2 trees as opposed to 4 shrubs and also the non-issuance of a permit for occupancy on this same property. Commissioner Kempe further commented on the bids on Lincoln Street. Chairman Steed made reference to the existence of a shed in Peddlers Village and the fact that this has never been cleared through a Conditional Use Permit. Councilman Unsworth commented that the Fire Chief is making a report on the swap meet. Commissioner Washburn commented that a lot of problems could be handled by the Redevelopment Agency when Council. A few other short matters were brought up with reference to the Commissioners reports and the meeting was concluded at 8:45 motion Commissioner Barnhart, Second Commissioner Washburn. There being no further business the Planning Commission adjourned to Design Review Board. 5-0. " Respectfully submitted Approved: Bernadette Thompson Planning Commission Secretary W. Steed Chairman MINUTE RECORD OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 16th DAY OF JUNE 1981 MINUTE ACTION Motion Boardmember Barnhart, second Boardmember Washburn to approved minutes of June 2, 1981 as submitted. PLANS TO BE CONSIDERED ~ 1. Commercial Building located at 16722 Lakeshore Drive. Staff gave history stating that applicant is proposing a commercial center with five separate structures for which Design Review approval is only requested on 2 proposed retail uses. Applicant further has not found tenants for the two restaurants and financial structures and does not wish to develop elevations until that time. Staff gave description of the exterior appearance and elevations stating further that no landscaping has been indicated. Staff recommended large trees and shurbs between Lakeshore Drive and the Financial structure, the Restaurant and Riverside and northerly edge of property and retail stores. Staff requested approval of plans subject to the following conditions: 1. Provide Sycamore trees around project with various types of ground landscaping, which shall include either Natal Plum, Bogenvelia, or Star Jasmine. 2. Provide Crape Murtle trees in the parking lot area. After some discussion as to the architectural design motion was made by Boardmember Barnhart and seconded by Boardmember Washburn to approve project as submitted. Duly approved 5-0. BUSINESS ITEMS ....'P"-.:!. ..... Design Review Board Criteria - Staff made reference to a previous decision during joint session with the Council in which it Design Review Board would again review Single-family units, therefore staff felt the Commission/Board might want to change the submittal format. After some discussion as to the previously proposed options it was decided that 1 copy would be sufficient for single-family submittals which could be put on the Board. There being no further business the regular meeting of the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board was adjourned at 9:05. motion Boardmember Barnhart second Boardmember Washburn Respectfully submitted, Approved: Bernadette Thompson Planning Commission Secretary W. Steed Chairman r-- MINUTE RECORD OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD ON THE 2nd DAY OF June 1981 MINUTE ACTION - Minutes of April 7, 1981, April 21, 1981 and May 19, 1981 approved as submitted, Motion Boardmember Barnhart, second Boardmember Washburn, with no additions or deletions. BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Street names on TM 16000 and 14706 ~ Staff gave the names selected for the above mentioned tracts: TPM 16000 W0rkman Drive for the loop street within Tract and Garretson Lane and Dolly Drive in Tract 14706. Staff gave the reason for these names with a recommendation that that be approvaed as submitted. Councilman Unsworth brought up the fact that Workman goes both north and south and east and west and that some kind of distinction should be made. After some discussion, it was decided that it would be Workman Drive and Workman Lane with the determination of which side would be designated east, west, north and south left up to the Planning Director. 2. Addition Determination - Staff gave history of this project stating that the owner of the Old Hotel Pizza Parlor is constructing a Gazebo in front of the structure. The structure being attached to the main structure by a 2 X 4. The purpose of this item is to specify the type of projects the Board wishes to review. Staff further related that the structure is unchanged, but the appearance of the structure will be substantially altered. Staff suggested that a policy ~ regarding additions of this type, that if elevations are required by Board, they shall be reviewed and approved for compatibility with the main structure by the Planning Director; and Structural plans should be submitted to the city for review by the Building Department. The Commission decided that these type structures should be reviewed on an individual basis and that no policy should be set, that there is no change in the structure and that the applicant should pull permits with a stetch plan with out the penality of Building Department having them tear the structure down. Motion Boardmember Washburn, second Boardmember Barnhart to approve the the structure as submitted. Duly approve 5-0. There being no further business, the regular meeting of the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board adjourned, Motion Boardmember Barnhart, second Boardmember Kempe. 10:15 P.M. Respectfully submitted Approved: , Bernadette Thompson Planning Commissioner Secretary W. Steed " MINUTE RECORD OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 7th DAY OF JULY 1981 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Dominguez at 7:32. ROLL CALL FOUND Commissioners: Kempe, Dominguez, Barnhart, Washburn and Chairman Steed. -.. Also present were Planning Director Morrissey, Councilman Unsworth and City Manager Rede. MINUTE ACTION Minutes of June 16th approved as submitted, Motion Commissioner Washburn, second Commissioner Dominguez. CONSENT CALENDAR Staff presented to the Planning Commission 2 items for the Consent calendar. Staff gave history of the first item "Arcade" stating that this item had come before the City Council because staff had requested a Conditional Use Permit. The Councilhaa~taken action waiving the necessity of of the CUP and approved the Arcade. There- fore in accordance with procedure Staff is bringing the item before the Commission more as informational. Commission moved to accept this item as informational and moved to the next Business License for Lake Elsinore Tackle Co. and Trading Post. There was some discussion as to the location of the business and activity to take place. Motion Commission Kempe, second Commission Barnhart to approve Business License for Lake Elsinore Tackle Co. and Trading Post as submitted. Duly approved 5-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Steed opened Public Hearings at 7:38 P.M. 1. Conditional Exception 81-3 - Located on Lake Street between High and Avenue 1, and Lake Street between Center and High. Staff gave history stating that the applicant is developing two lots with approximately 3,280 sq. feet each for which he felt that to build on each lot he would have to vary from requried setback or lot line requirements. Staff explained that the applicant has presented two different types of alternatives, each one varys 5 feet either in the front or rear yards. There was some disucssion with reference to substandard lots when there is the same ownership. Staff recommended approval of Plan 2 whereby there would be a variance from required rear-yard set backs by fifteen feet. At this time Chairman Steed asked if there was anyone in favor of CEP 81-3. In favor was the applicant Tony Schiavone who gave further explanation of his proposed project and ownership thereof. Also in favor was Mamie Moore who presently lives maar the subject property and expressed a desire that the proposed project be approved. In opposition was Johnnie Richardson who was interested in the inconsistency of the of the setbacks and the easments. After some further discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Washburn and seconded by Commissioner Barnhart that Plan lA be approved whereby the applicant vary from the rear yard set back from 25 feet to 20 feet. Duly Approved 5-0. 2. Conditional Use Permit 81-6 ~ 32081 Corydon Road, Skylark Airport. Staff explained to the Commission that the incorrect location had been obtained from the applicant and the the wrong property owners of the within the 300 foot radius had been notified. Therefore, not meeting the requirement of notification, until the proper owners have been notified staff would recorrmend that:the time be tabled indefipately. There was sane discussion with regard to the exact location of the vending trailer, the item was then tabled. r-t:>tion Carmission Dominguez, second Carmissioner Bamahrt. 5-0. .' Minutes July 7, 1981 Page 2 ,- I 3. Conditional Use Permit 81-6 - Southwest corner of Lakeshore Drive and Lucerne. - Staff gave history stating that applicant request use of a mobile- home as a temporary caretakers residence on a commercial and residential property.which was reloacted on this property due to the flooding in 1980. Staff further stated the the unit is 8 X 30 putting it into the substandard brackett. Staff recommended approval of Conditional Use Permit 81-7 for a period of 6 months. Chairman Steed opened the Public Hearing at 8:35. There being no one in the audience in favor or in opposition the public hearing was closed and table open for discussion. The Commission feeling there no need for the caretakers residence, the emergency being over and the appearance of the trailer moved for a period of 3 months on the CUP with no extension, Motion Carrmissioner Washburn, second Coomissioner Dominguez. BUSINESS 1. Sign Memo - Staff gave brief comment on this item stating that the Planning Department and building Department had done some research on various ordinances and codes relating to signs and had forwarded this information to the City Attorney for review and is now awaiting feedback at which time staff will bring the information before the Commission. 2. Fee for Submittals - Staff explained that City Council had discussed developing a fee schedule for projects which currently receive a no cost review. Staff made reference to the enclosed Resolution on the fees, followed by disucssion of its contents. It was unani- mously decided that the tem be tabled until next meeting giving the commission more time to review and make a recommendation. 3. Parking Ordinance - Staff gave explaination of the layout of the parking ordinance and history as to the method of securing the the information and guidelines included. Extensive discussion insued with relation to the actual need for a parking ordinance and the effects it will have on the community. Comments were made by Bob Switzer, who is very much in favor of such an ordinance and feels that the city needs such an instrument. The Commission felt that they needed more time to review the Ordinance and requested that any further discussion be conducted at the next meeting. INFORMATIONAL PLANNING DIRECTORS REPORT - Staff informed the Commission that the Industrial Ordinance is still being reviewed by CDC; the 1265 MSL has been reimposed; procedure for single family units is being imposed, whereby there will be 2 complete sets of working drawings, separate plot plan and elevations of all sides and all other requirements for building department to be submitted at the time the project is accepted for Design Review Board; Housing Element has been completed and will be submitted to the Council and Commission at the end of July for review Redevelopment meeting has been continued to July 13; Army Corp of Engineers meeting will be Thursday at 7:30 at which time they will bring back various types of alternatives and costs for mitigating flood problems; August 20th will be the meeting on the General Plan; Ivy Ong which was scheduled for this meeting (commercial) will be pospon~ due to lack of information that was supposedly prepared and has not yet been started; staff has met with with regard to survey to be performed to inventory all structures of a historical nature. COMMISSIONERS REPORTS and RECOMMENDATIONS - Commissioner Barnhart informed the Commissioner that the house on Lakeshore has been moved and that the reason for the pot holes on Lincoln is due to the sprinkler system in Woodhaven. Commissioner Washburn stated that he was in total support of the Redevelopment Plan. Commissioner Kempe inquired of Loren Culp, Assistant City Engineer the actual ylans for Lincoln Street. - ~ - " Minutes July 7, 1981 Page 3 There being no further disucssion, the regular meeting of the Lake Elsinore Planning Commissioner was closed at 9:30 P.M. Motion Commission Barnhart, second Commissioner Washburn. Respectfully submitted, Approved: Bernadette Thompson Planning Commission Secretary w. Steed MINUTES RECORD OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 7th DAY OF JULY 1981 MINUTE ACTION - Motion Boardmember Barnhart, second Boardmember Washburn to approve minutes of June 16, 1981 as submitted. There being no further business the regular meeting of the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board was adjourned at 9:35. Motion Boardmember Barnhart, second Boardmember Washburn. Respectuflly submitted, Approved: Bernadette Thompson Planning Commission Secretary W. Steed Chairman /"' - /"' ".. ,r' MINUTE RECORD OF HELD ON THE LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION 21st DAY OF July 1981 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was lead by Chairman Steed 7:35 P.M. ROLL CALL found Chairman Steed, Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart. ABSENT was Commissioner Kempe Also present was Planning Director Morrissey, and City Manager Rede MINUTE ACTION Motion Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Washburn to accept Minutes of July 7, 1981 as submitted with corrections. PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Steed opened public hearing at 7:40 P.M. 1. Conditional Use Permit 81-6- Chairman Steed opened hearing giving location as 32081 Corydon Road, Skylark Airport. Staff gave history of the project, stating that applicant is relo- cating a vending trailer in use at the Airport prior to the 1980 Flood, to vend snack foods and related items to patrons. Staff stated that the CUP is requested in order to place con- ditions on the use. Staff recommended approval subject to listed conditions. The Commissioners were concerned with how many trailers there would be since there was an existing trailer presently there, what sewage provisions would be and was there a possibility that the airport would be moved back to its original location. In favor was the applicant Paul Bennett who clarified the questions of the commission and adding that the possible move of the airport would probably be within the next month requiring him to also move. In op- position there was no one. The public hearing was closed at 8:00 P.M. There was also discussion among the commissioners at this time. There being no further comments, Motion Commissioner Washburn, second Commissioner Barnhart to appro- val approval CUP 81-6 subject to the following conditions: 1. Provide adequate sewage disposal in the form of a holding tank. 2. Pay fees as required by ordinance 572. 3. Provide all necessary improvements and dedications as provided in ordinance 572. 4. Provide parking for 5 vehicles as required by parking guidelines utilized by the city. Plan must be approved by Planning Director. 5. Finding of conformance with present and proposed General Plan. 6. Finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 7. Issuance of a negative declaration. 8. Fees will be waived if applicant must reapply within 2 months after Council approval. 9. Application to be reviewed within 6 months. 2. Zone Change 81-2 - Chairman Steed opened public hearing g~v~ng location as North of Pottery Street south of Flint Street between Lindsey and Kellogg Streets; zone change from R-2 to R-3. Staff gave history stating that the applicant is propos- ing a zone change from R-2 to R-3 in order to develop 57 apart- ment units. R-2 allowing 17 units per acre and R-3 allowing 43 units per acre. Staff gave an account of the affordability and referred to an illustration on the board for further clari- fication of the project. In favor was the Applicant, Bill Krouse who commented that he felt that this type of project was needed in the area. In opposition there were no comments. ,-.... .-...- /""' ~ '- ~ Planning Commission July 21, 1981 Page Two closed the public hearing at 8:05. There followed some dis- cussion regarding soil errosion problem, mitigation for rain impact, retaining walls/block walls, resurfacing of streets . Le. Lindsey paving and Commissioner Washburn expressed con- cern with the resurfacing of gutters, streets, and the pos- sibility of the city doing one half. After some further dis- cussion Motion was made by Commissioner.Washburn, second Commission Dominguez to accept staff recommendation Barnhart. as submitted, for zone change from R-2 to R-3 for 11 parcels. Approved 4-0. BUSINESS MATTERS 1. Bob Williams - Waiver of Parcel Map Requirements - staff gave history by first informing the commission of a similar re- quest Abe Liss for a waiver of parcel map requirements some time ago. Staff explained that the applicant is requesting waiver of parcel map requirements for purchase of a portion of railroad right-of-way adjacent a commercially zoned par- cel that per ordinance 529 needs a waiver in order not to require a parcel map. Staff recommended a dedication of 10 feet along Lakeshore Drive to affect a 40 feet half-width right-of-way as provided in the General Plan. There was some discussion by the Commissioners with regard to the pro- cess to be taken and how it would be expedited and it was decided with the applicant to dedicate during the construc- tion phase of the process. After some brief discussion motion was made by Commissioner Dominguez and seconded by Commissioner Barnhart to approve the Waiver of Parcel Map requirements. Approved 4-0. 2. Parking Ordinance - Staff gave a brief explanation of the park- ing ordinance and the means of deriving at some of its res- trictions. Motion was made by Commissioner Dominguez to make a recommendation to City Council for adoption as written, seconded by Commissioner Barnhart. 3. Fee Schedule - Staff made reference to a fee schedule for various services rendered by staff. The Commission showed concern for the listing of an amount of time before the fees would be imposed, i.e. 15 to 20 minutes. After some discussion on the item, it was recemmended the fe~for Certificate of Compliance be deleted and a. time factor o;f; 30 min\1tes of staff review be attached to Special Service Letta fee. Mot.ion CE>rruni~<0_ sioner Washburn, second Commissioner Barnhart to-aoprove fee - . sche~ule with deletions and additions as noted, --. INFORMATIONAL PLANNING DIRECTORS REPORT - Staff brought to the attention of the commission a business license which had been brought into the of- fice today and there was not enough time to have it agendized. This item was "J.J. ts Disco" which will be in a C-l area on Main Street. The commission approved this item to be in conformance with permitted uses. Staff informed the Commissioner of an R.V. Study Session to be held at 7:30 on July 22, 1981 with City Coun- cil and R.V. park owners. Staff further informed the commission of a Study Session to be held on July 29 at 7:30 P.M. for which there will be an agenda and all commissioners who have items they wish to be brought up should submit to the Planning Department. Staff stated half of the study session would relate to a proposed project near the lake. Staff commented on there being a second reading of the Redevelopment and final adoption to be in 30 days by City Council. Planning Commission July 21, 1981 Page Three COMMISSIONER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS /'" - Commissioner Barnhart relayed the experience she had had with LETS whereby she had tried for three hours to get in contact with them unsuccessfully. Also it was brought up ,whether the fire hydrants on Riverside Drive had been checked. Commissioner Dominguez informed the Commissioner that Sun City had gotten an increase in the areas included in their local telephoning area and would like to see Elsinore do the same. Commissioner Washburn reminded the Commission of the Real Estate Seminar to be held at March Air Force on the 29th There being no further business the regular meeting of the Lake Elsinore Planning Com- mission was adjourned, Motion Commissioner Washburn, second Com- missioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0. Respectfully submitted, Approved: Bernadette Thompson Planning Commission Secertary w. Steed /""" ". """"' -, MINUTE RECORD OF MEETING HELD ON THE LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 21st DAY OF July, 1981 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Steed MINUTE ACTION I""'" PLANS FOR CONSIDERATION ,.-... 1. Krouse Builders, Inc. - Located north of Pottery Street 57 Units. Staff gave history stating that the applicant is proposing 57 apartment units on 11 contiguous lots, 6-5 unit structures; 4-4 units structures and 1 ten unit structure. The structures will have stucco exterior, tile roof and raised panel entry doors. Staff recommended ap- proval subject to 4 conditions. The Commissioner had some comments mainly with reference to walls and trees. There being no further comments Motion was made by Commissioner Dominguez and second by Boardmember Barnhart to approve the project subject to the following conditions: 1. Chinese Pistache trees be provided on the northerly and southerly exposures between the structures. Minimum of four (4) on each lot. 2. Holly Oak Trees be provided in the parkway area. Mini- mum one (1) tree per lot. 3. Applicants choice of ground cover be provided around structures. I""'" 4. 42 inch block walls be provided on lot lines including interior lot lines to screen parking areas and the glare of head lights. There being no further business, the regular meeting of the Design Review Board was closed at 10: 05 P.M.. /"' ,,-. - ."",,",0 MINUTE RECORD OF HELD ON THE LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSSION 4th DAY OF PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Kempe at 7:36 P.M. August 1981 ROLL CALL found Chairman Steed, Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner Kempe, Commissioner Barnhart and Commissioner Washburn. Also present was Planning Director Morrissey. ) .~ MINUTE ACTION There being no minutes, Chairman Steed tabled minutes until nest-r meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Conditional Use Permit 81-9 - Chairman Steed opened the Public Hearing at 7:37, giving location as 32310 Riverside Drive, permitting a Temporary Trailer. Staff gave .history stating that the applicant is requesting use of a trailer for the purpose of temporarily dispensing alcoholic beverages. Staff further informed the Commission that the applicant has been before the City Council with regard to this request after her permanent building had been destroyed as a result of a fire. The City Council approved this request providing the applicant apply for a Conditional Use Permit within 30 days, at which time the application will be expedited. Staff recommended approval for a 6 month period. Chairman Steed opened the Public Hearing at 7:40 P.M. In favor was applicant Kay Jordan who expressed her desire to open a temporary trailer. There being no one else in favor and no one in opposition Chairman Steed closed the Public Hearing on Conditional Use Permit 81-9 at 7:40 P.M. After some discussion by the Commissioners with regard to Health Department approval, existence of both a womens and mens toilet and ABC approval, a motion was made by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Conditional Use Permit 81-9 for a period of 6 months, at which time it is to come back before the Planning Commission. Seconded by Commissioner Kempe. ) .... - 2. Tentative Tract Map 18048 - Chairman Steed opened the Public Hearing at 7:45, giving description as a 33 lot subdivision, South of Machado Streetnotth of Amber Lane , between Lincoln Street and Leach Canyon Channel. Staff gave history stating boundaries. Staff further stated that the tract had previously been approved as TTM 15021 in 1979 for which 18 conditions had been imposed and have been met. Nevertheless the approval time of the map had expired. It was decided by the City Council that applicant secure a new tract number and submit a new application for approval. Staff recommended approval subject to conditions. Chairman Steed opened the Public Hearing at 7:53 P.M. In favor was Art Nelson, the applicant. There being no one in opposition Chairman Steed closed the Public Hearing at 7:54 P.M. There was brief discussion with regard to the project followed by a motion by Commissioner Dominguez, second Commissioner Washburn to approve TTM 18048 subject to the following conditions: . 1. ...l 2. \ )' 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Applicant comply with Lake Elsinore Public Works Traffic Engineer conditions. Applicant dedicate to provide 60 foot right-of-way on Christina Court and "A" Street. Applicant to install curb and gutters 18 feet from center line. Applicant provide 24 foot access pavement to Machado Street. Applicant install standard sidewalk. Applicant to install ornamental street lights, (conform to standards of Southern California Edison). Applicant to provide adequate drainage. Minutes of Planning Commission August 4, 1981 Page 2 8. 9. .~ f 10. 11. I 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. ) 17. 18. I 19. 20. 21. Payoff/split outstanding sewer bonds. Provide the City of Lake Elsinore with a letter of water availability, (E.V.M.W.D.). Install sewer main appurtenances. All grading to be done by the applicants engineer to the specifications of the City. .... Applicant shall pay costs incurred to acquire five (5) feet of street dedication along Christina Court on two parcels, abutting Machado Street, not in~udedin Tract and shall improve right-of-way of Christina Court and frontage along two parcels on Machado Street with curbs, gutter, sidewalks, and paving. Applicant to pay all appropriate fees in accordance with Ordinance. Project shall comply with all Riverside County Fire Department requirements. Project to comply with Univorm Fire Code - #13.301. All trees, not in a designated roadway, driveway, foundation or house site, shall be retained on the site. Applicant to pay required Park fees per City Formula. Compliance with other conditions required by the City Engineer during review by City Council. Finding of no significant impact on the environment. ....., Issuance of a Negative Declaration. Applicant to dedicate full right-of-way width on access road. BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Peddlers Village- Commercial Structure - Staff gave history stating applicant is proposing a commercial structure of approximately 1435 sq. ft. to sell antiques, dishes, cloths, and cememt items. Staff recommended approval subject to condi- tions. There was extensive discussipn by the Commissioner with regard to Fire Department recommendatin, tin roof and the insufficency of the plans submitted by the applicant. Comments were made by the owner Mr. Harmatz with regard to walls exting- uishers fire drills and hoses, follwed by a motion by Commissioner Dominguez, seconded by Commissioner Barnhart for approval subject to the following conditions: ) f 1. Provide one (1) hour fire walls on all sides UBC p. 59) if applicable. 2. Provide roadway access for fire apparatus. [UFC Section 10.207 (a)]. Provide adequate water for required fire .... flows. 3. Area does not presently meet required fire flows for fire protection. New buildings should not be constructed until fire flows are improved. 4. Must conform to all requirements of Ordinance 572. 5. Must meet all requirements of County Fire Department and Fire Safety/Housing Inspector. ~ ~ ) ~ ~ ~ ) Minutes of Planning Commission August 4, 1981 Page 3 6. Finding of no significant impact on the environment. 7. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. 2. World Savings - Commercial Structure - Staff gave history stating the applicant is proposing a branch of World Savings to be built in the Elsinore Valley Shopping Center. The Commissioner had some discussion with input from 2 representa- tives for World Savings, Jim Boloa and Craig Rothenburger. Refer- ence was made to illustrations of the project and the necessity of some of the conditions. After extensive discussion with re- gard to curbs and gutters, motion was made by Commissioner Dominguez with a second from Commissioner Kempe with an abstention by Commissioner Washburn to approve the project subject to the following conditions: 1. Submit grading plans providing for drainage of property immediately to the east. 2. Provide curb and gutter to property line. 3. Provide for handicap access to building as required by UBC. 4. Submit complete buildng plans including all documents required by Planning and Building Departments. Energy calculation~ percolation test, waste disposal plan, letter of water availability, certificate of survey, and grant deet. 5. Meet all requirements of the County Fire Department. 6. Finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 7. Issuance of a negative declaration. Duly approved 4-0 3. Lot Line Adjustment 81-7 - Northeast of the intersection of Lakeview Drive and Malaga Road. Staff gave history stating that Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District proposes to revise their property boundaries to provide street access and land suitable to development, in essense this project is a trade from one land owner to another. Staff made reference to the attahced exhibits in the packet. After a brief discussion of the project Commissioner Barnhart made a motion to accept Staff recommendation as submitted, seconded, Commissioner Kempe. Approved 5-0. INFORMATIONAL 1. Sphere of Influence- Staff explained that it had been requested previously that the Commission be allowed to review projects that are submitted to the Planning Department for review. ,PLANNING DIRECTORS REPORT Staff informed the Commission that theCity Council is having the second reading of the 1270 Ordinance and budget study session which is running concurrently with the Planning Commission meeting. Secondly, Staff made reference to the Housing Element and documents which have been passed out for review tonight for which a Public Hearing will be held on August 18 and September 1. Staff also made mention of documents that had been placed in the Commissioners boxes with reference to Extension classes based on Signs, Subdivision Map Act and CEQA. -j 1 ) - '] _1 Minutes of Planning Commission August 4, 1981 Page 4 COMMISSIONERS REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Commissioner Washburn suggested that some measures be taken to cut down on bad maps that are turned in such as returning them for resubmittal. Also, Commissioner Washburn suggested and it was concurred with by the other Commissioners that a memo be sent to City Council requesting them to send a letter to Ken Wright and Walt Abraham a letter with regard to quality of water utilized by the City, ways problems can be mitigated and of what assistance the city can be with these such solutions. There being no further business, the regular session of the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission, adjourned to Design Review Board. Motion Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Kempe. ... Respectfully submitted Approved: Bernadette Thompson Planning Commission Secretary W. Steed, Chairman ... ... MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 4th DAY OF AUGUST 1981. MINUTE ACTION Tabled until next meeting. ) ~ PLANS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Tentative Tract Map 17222 Staff gave history stating that the report on this Tract would be verbal rather than written. Staff gave description of the shape of the tract and illustrated the elevations on the board. 41 units are proposed and tract map approval was given previously. The only problem staff expressed to the commission is that due to the new alignment a revised map would have to be submitted. There was discussion with regard to density, change of lot lines and other aspects of the project. Staff with use of the illustration (elevations) showed to the commission the various designs to be used, with emphasis on the size, number of bedrooms, dwelling area, material proposed and the variation of garage placement. The Commission had questions relative to CC & Rls and" sewers. There being no further comments, motion was made by Commissioner Washburn second Commissioner Barnhart to accept Tentative Tract Map 17222 as submitted. ) I -- 2. World Savings - Staff gave history designating the location to be the Elsinore Valley Shopping Center at 31869 Mission Trail. Staff gave description of the appearance, the building ~eing of stucco, and the building being in harmony with structures ln the area. Staff recommended approval of elevations and site plan subject to applicant placing Liquidamber trees in the lawn area on the east side of the structure. There were questions as to with regard to the reasoning behind having liquidamber trees as opposed to any other type of tree for which staff explained this decision was arrived at by the type of trees at Security Pacific Bank and in the area. Chairman Steed suggested that if the applicant was not satisfied that he secure a copy of the tree list from Planning and choose from there. There being no further comments a motion was made by Commissioner Barnhart and seconded by Commissioner Washburn that the project be approved as submitted with the deletion of Liquiidamber to be trees to be mutually agreeable between staff and applicant. Duly approved 5-0. 3. Peddlers Village - Commercial structure located at 18180 Collier, Peddlers Village Swap Meet, Space 11. With the deletion of items 2 and 3, staff recommendation was that Applicant resubmit plans to identify 1) Design coordination of exterior side walls and roof and 2) indicate vehicular parking area. After some brief dicussion with regard to the inadequacy of the submitted plans motion was made by Commissioner Washburn and seconded by Commissioner Barnhart to table the project and have staff bring back revised plans. ~ There being no further business the regular meeting of the design Review Board was closed as 9:55 P.M. Motion Boardmenber Barnhart, second Boardmenber Washburn. Respectfully submitted Approved: Bernadette Thompson Planning Commissioner Secretart W. Steed J l , ) , I ( ~ MINUTE RECORD OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD OF THE 18th August, 1981 DAY OF PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was lead by Planning Director Morrissey, 7:40pm. ROLL CALL FOUND Commissioners: Kempe, Dominguez, Washburn, and Chairman Steed. Absent was Commissioner Barnhart. Also present were: Jim M~rrissey, Planning Director, and Councilman Unsworth. ..-If Opening statement by Chairman Steed requesting that minutes by prepar- ed and available to the Commissioners on the Friday following the meeting. PUBLIC HEARING Chairman Steed opened Public Hearing at 7:43pm. 1. Conditional Exception 81-6 - near intersection of Bromley and Bennett. Don Vickers of U.S. Rural Homes requests variance from the required rear yard set-back in the single family residential district. Staff states request would allow a 16 foot rear yard set-back instead of the required 25 foot set-back. He stated that similar variances on the same street have been approved for U.S. Rural Homes in the past, and if the 19 foot side yard set- back was included with the 16 foot rear yard, it would provide more than the amount required by ordinance. There being no op- position, motion to approve the plan was made by Commissioner Dominguez, second by Commissioner Kempe. Public hearing closed at 7:44pm. Approved 4-0. 2. Housing Element - Staff gave introduction regarding input from community groups. Planning Commission discussion ensued regard- ing the nece~sity of the Housing Element and General Plan. Public Hearing opened at 8:10pm. John Gale stated the draft element did not meet the needs of the community and wanted a revised ele- ment. Don Vickers stated the necessity of lower income housing and that information to the city had been presented in "the: past to prove this point. Commission concurred with Mr. Gale to extend the hearing until September 1, and September 15th, with the Planning Commission. Motion was made by Commissioner Dominguez to extend hearing, second by Commissioner Kempe. Approved 4-0. -- BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Marina - Staff gave presentation of proposal of Marina Facilities in relationship to proposed state project. Commission was inform- ed that Mr. Somners property was of high priority to the state and that he would soon be approached regarding purchase of the property by the state. Staff recommended Mr. Somners be denied due to the state project. Considerable discussion was held re- garding Mr. Somners application and present need to obtain income. Mr. Goodman questioned the State's reasons for purchasing property and the effect Mr. Somners project could have on him Commission requested Mr. Somners work with State regarding potential of leas- ing his property and provide written notification of intent to acquire his property. Mr. Somners would return when answers are provided. Motion to continue hearing was made by Commissioner Kempe, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0. -- ) ~ ) , ""' ,..:...- /' ~ Page Two Minute of Record - Planning Commission August 18, 1981 BUSINESS ITEMS CONTINUED. 2. Riverside County General Plan - Staff gave brief presentation on proposed County General Plan and hearing to be conducted on the 20th of August. Staff informed Commission of the process County would utilize to determine whether project should be approved and what standards tc impose. Brief discussion held on how County would interact with City. Commission noted staff presen- tation. PLANNING DIRECTOR REPORTS - None PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS - Commissioner Kempe reports. two .itEms. 1) Doors should open at 7:15pm for public; and 2) Requests copy of letter regarding EVMWD water problem. Staff indicated this matter had been referred to City Council and the Council would act upon it at next regular meeting. Commissioner Washburn wanted the long trailer on Heald Street checked by Code Enforcement Officer and mentioned a program for Commissioners through extension courses. Commissioner Dominguez requested stop or yield sign at ,ria Valdez and Lincoln Street. Councilman Unsworth noted it was unnecessary because the street would not remain a cul-de-sac. Motion to adjourn meeting was made by Commissioner Washburn, second by Commissioner Kempe. Meeting adjourned to Design Review Board at 9:05pm. Respectfully Submitted Approved Lynne DeNisi W. Steed Chairman ~ l \) /~J ? MINUTES OF THE LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING HELD ON THE 18th DAY OF August, 1981 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Steed opened meeting at 9:05 P.M. PLANS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. U.S. Rural Homes - Single family residenc~located on Bromley. Staff gave presentation, all requirements had been met. Motion to accept plans made by Commissioner Dominguez, second by Commission Washburn. Approved 4-0. ..., 2. John Shulz - Single family residence located at 4199 Crestview. Staff gave presentation, all requirements had been met. Motion to accept plans made by Commissioner Kempe, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 4-0. 3. Tentative Tract Map 14450 - 20 single family residences located south of Machado, west of Lincoln. Staff noted similarity of designs but would be interchanged with other designs in the 20 unit tract. All other requirements had been met. Motion to accept plans made by Commissioner Dominguez, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0. 4. Peddlers Village - Commercial structure located at 18180 Collier, Peddlers Village Swap Meet Space 11. Board had agendized this item for this meeting but revised plans were not submitted. Staff indicated building permits would not be issued until the Board gives approval. So noted. Commissioner Washburn motioned to adjourn meeting. Commissioner Steed second the motion. Approved 4-0. Meeting adjourned at 9:13pm. Respectfully Submitted Approved --- Lynne DeNisi W. Steed Chairman ... , ~...... ....... -- <,....:.. -- ... MINUTE RECORD OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 1st September, DAY OF 1981 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Planning Director Morrissey, 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL found Chairman Steed, Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart. Also present was Planning Director Morrissey,. City Manager Rede and Councilman Unsworth. MINUTE ACTION Minutes were approved as submitted for July 21, 1981 with a change of wording in Business Item #3, Fee Schedule to reflect deletion of Certificate of Compliance and time factor of 30 minutes. Motion Commissioner Barnhart, Second Commissioner Dominguez. Minutes of August 4, 1981 were approved as submitted. Motion Commissioner Dominguez, second Commissioner Barnhart. Minutes of August 18, 1981 were approved as submitted with an addition of information to the Housing Element. Motion Commissioner Kempe, second Commissioner Washburn. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Conditional Exception Permit 81-7 Chairman Steed opened the hearing at 7:35 P.M. as a variance from the required rear set back for a single family residence. Staff gave history stating that the applicant is requesting the rear yard set- back requirement be waived in order to allow construction of an addition to an existing structure, with an encroachment of an additional nine feet into the rear yard which will result in the north east corner of structure being 6 feet from the property line. Before the encroachment would take place that portion of the structure will be demolished and reconstructed. Staff recommended approval. At this time Chairman Steed opened the Public Hearing at 7:38. In favor was Tom Tiedemann, the applicant who stated that the presentation by staff was accurate and his only comment that the structure would not be an obstruction to traffic. Also in favor was John Allen, who lives next door, who was very much in favor of the improvement to the property and stated that in the 11 years that he has lived there no one has ever done anything to the property. In opposition, staff read a letter received by the Planning Department from a Hilda Lizer of Temecula who owns property within the 300 ft. radius and expressed her disapproval of the variance. There being no one else in opposition the Public Hearing was closed at 7:45 P.M. The Commission being in favor of the project a motion was made by Commissioner Washburn and seconded by Commissioner Barnhart to approve CEP 8~-7 with a recommendation that the $75.00 Environmental Assessment be refunded. Approved 5-0. 2. Conditional Use Permit 81-10 - Construction of 49 RV sites. Staff gave report stating that the applicant is proposing 49 RV sites and connecting service roads. 23 of the sites would replace sites currently under water or severly damaged by the Flood and 26 sites which would be additional. Staff recommended approval of the project subject to certain conditons. Chairman Steed opened the Public Hearing at 7:45 P.M. In favor was Ervin Palmer, the applicant stating that there were some conditions that he had comments about and one that was unacceptable. Mr. Palmer stated the extension of the existing fence was acceptable 2 years ago and; that the 6 months referred to in condition #6 as the duration of occupancy would be a hardship and would like to have 8 months to a year which had been previously worked out with City Council. Also in favor was Al Wood from Road Runner Park who stated that the applicant runs a fine park, obeys laws and l J Minutes of Planning Commission Septemhe~ 1, 1981 Page 2 is in favor of the site being improved. There being no one in opposition the hearing was closed at 7:55 P.M. The Commission held discussion with regard to the duration of time to be given for residency. There was concern with regard to children being registered in school if nine months residency was approved. The Commission was also concerned with regard to the consistency of landscaping with the existing site. Mr. Palmer informed the Commission that there would be large trees on every other site and that it would be consistent. There being no further discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Barnahrt to approve the project as submitted with the change in residency from 6 months to 8 months, together with compliance with all conditions as stated -- below, second Commissioner Dominguez. 1. Applicant shall meet all provisions required by the City Engineer. 2. Applicant shall meet all provlslons requried by the Department of Building and Safety. 3. Applicant shall abide by all requirements imposed by the Fire Department. 4. Sewer system shall be flood proof and subject to approval by the City Engineer, and Building Department. 5. Vehicular residency be limited to a 8 month duration. 6. Enrollment of children in local schools, other than those of the manager or caretaker shall not be allowed. Violation will be cause for revocation of CUP. 7. Provide dump station within park connected to holding tank. All RV's must dump their holding tanks prior to connecting to internal sewer system. -- 8. Provide protection of existing lake view from Riverside Drive. 9. Pay all applicable fees as required by Ordinance 572. 10. Applicant shall provide the City Attorney with a hold harmless agreement as required under Section 17.36.030 of the City's Zoning Code. 11. Finding of no significant impact. 12. Issuance of a negative declaration. 13. Finding of conformance with the General Plan and any applicable or additional element to be adopted by the City Council. 3. Tentative Parcel Map 13708-2 Division of 40 acres into one twenty-five acre parcel and three five acre parcels. Staff gave report stating that the parcel map had been previously reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council in 1978 ana denied without prejudice. It has now been revised and if approved would be a more rational subdivision. It is located near the dump and near Highway I-IS. It has 560 foot long cul-de-sac providing-- access to all parcels. The access l~questionable and the extension and use of services does not warrant or compatible with the logical growth pattern of the community. Chairman Steed opened the hearing at 8:12 P.M. In favor was Gary Akers of Akers and Musser as a representative for the applicant, who spoke in favor of the project. Also in favor of the project was the applicant Minutes of Planning Commission September 1, 1981 Page 3 -r- who stated that California Land and Title had stated that there was legal access to the property and that he would be building roads. There was discussion with relation to location of existing land fill and the proposed subdivision and there being no access shown on the map. There being no one in opposition the Public Hearing was closed at 8:21 P.M. The Commission at this time had discussion with regard to conditions 1-4 for which staff stated they were original condtions from 1978; condition #7 was due to ordinance 240 and #8,-#9 and #10 are standard. Chairman Steed felt that the project was not big enough to require curbs gutters and sidewalks and that it would cause a hardship. At this point there was some disucssion with regard to the allowable uses in R-l, R-2 and R-3, which staff clarified to the Commission. Discussion continued with regard to dedicating all water rights to the city, for which the Commiss- ion felt was not 'fair in as much as they would have to dig their own wells. After some discussion with regard to what conditions would be acceptable and which conditionsl would not, with input from the City Manager, a motion was made by Commissioner Washburn and seconded by Commissioner Barnhart to approve the project with the deletion of conditions 3 and 4 and modification of condition of condition #5, as submitted by staff.as follows: 1. The property shown in the parcel map appears to be landlocked and not to have access to any public right of way. Prior to any approvals by the Planning Commission, the developer should provide the City with proof of access to public right of way. ,.:.... 2. The dedications as shown in the map indicate proposed 30 feet of right of way. In accordance with Ordinance 529, section 3.2A4, a minimum of 40 feet of dedication is required. 3. Dedicate to City water rights within the property of the parcel map except that required to provide for development on individual parcels. 4. Subdivider shall work with City to provide a landscaping and lighting assessment district over all four parcels. Owner or owners of property within this area shall carry cost of filing assessments with County Assessor. 5. Submit application for zone change to Low Density Residential within 30 days of City Council approval. 6. A finding of no significant impact on the environment. 7. Issuance of negative declaration. 8. Conformance, with General Plan and any applica e additonal elements to be by the City Council. Duly approved 5-0. - 4. Housing Element - Staff stated that this was a continuance from the August 18, 1981 meeting. Staff informed the commission that the errata sheet in the packet reflected changes to be made to the Housing Element and that the meeting at this time was to se- cure public input. Chairman Steed continued the Public Hearing at 8; 55 P.M. There being no one in favor or against the Public Hearing was continued to September 15. The Commission had a few questions and comments to make with regard to the Housing Element. It was decided that staff would compose a revised summary of these comments as so noted and will incorporate them into the document. l J 1\ Minutes Planning Commission September 2, 1981 Page 4 BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Lot Line Adjustment 81-6 Staff gave report stating that applicant wants to delete the proerty line between a 16.29 acre parcel and a newly acquired portion of railroad right- of way, which will create one parcel and allow the applicant ingress and egress from Lakeshore Drive. Staff informed the Commission that applicant had previously been granted a waiver of Parcel Map requirements which required applicant to deed all water rights to the City. Staff recommended approval of the lot line -- adjustment subject to approval of the Redevelopment Agency. Discussion insued with regard to several issues in the project followed by a motion by Commissioner Dominguez and second by Commissioner Kempe to accept staff recommendation. Approved 5-0. 2. Eric Sommers - Proposed Marina facilites Staff gave report stating that the Planning Commission at the last meeting had requested some type of letter from the State stating their intentions on the property. As stated in the letter, the state is nevertheless being very non-committal to future plans. There was extensive conversation with the applicant and Commission with regard to the State and their position in this project after which the Chair asked that the matter be tabled until the next meeting for the purpose of obtaining additional information from the appeals Board with consensus by the Commission. 5-0. 3. Tom Minger - Addition to Commercial Structure - Staff reported that the applicant is proposing an addition of 176 square feet to an existing structure which will conform to the appearance of the existing structure and be only 3 feet higher with a false front. Staff recommended approval of the plans as submitted. Motion Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Dominguez. 5-0. ..... 4. Reveiw of County Parcel Maps - Staff gave report on the 4 maps submitted to the Commission for review. Staff made reference to 4 parcels , 1 acre each located near the airport and 18 lots 1/2 acres in size located near Lemon Street. The Commission had discussion with regard to the relation of the airport and runway and possible problems. The Commission decided that in staffs comments to the County that it should be mentioned the impact of the airport and possible redevelopment in that area and make aware of the proposed use in the area. There being no further business items, the Chairman addressed Council- mand Unsworth who informed the Commission that as representative for the Redevelopment Agency it was the desire of the agency that the Commissioners that are able to attend the Mayors and Councilmans conference in Indio on Wednesday September 9, 1981, which is the annual monthly meeting, for which the topic will be Revitalizing our cities. INFORMATIONAL -- Planning Directors Report - Staff informed the Commission that the City Council has directed staff to bring the Hillside Planned Develop- ment Ordinance before them as soon as possible and that it is now being circulated and as soon input is received from the various departments it will be brought before the Planning Commission for approval. The General Plan advisory Committee had its first meeting with an attendance of 8 out of 16 people which was nevertheless very interesting and helpful. The Historical group is continuing to work on their survey which should be completed by October at which time the downtown area will be completed and sent to the county and state. The process has been speeded up because it is in the Redevelopment Plan Area and '- Minutes Planning Commission September 2, 1981 Page 5 Neighborhood Strategy Area for which the theme would identify specific uses in the downtown area and would help the business people and the agency. Staff continued also informing the Commission that all projects in the Redevelopment area will now go before the Redevelopment Agency for recommendation and final comment. Staff further made reference to a decision of the City Council to lighten the load in the agenda packet and made the same request to the Commission. ~ Staff asked the Commission that they get back to staff regarding deletions to the agenda. Commissioners Reports and Recommendations - Commissioner Washburn asked that the Code Enforcement Officer be made aware of an old refrigerator on the dirt road which parallels Franklin Street going out of town which still has the locks on it and can be very dangerous. Additionally reference was made to the Rexall Store leaving racks on the sidewalk. Commissioner Dominguez made reference to the gate on Via Valdez which is locked, for which it was suggested that FEMA be contacted in order to get it open. There being no further business, the regular meeting~f the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission was concluded at 10: 05 P.M. r.1otion Commissioner Dominguez, second Commissioner Washburn to adjourn to the Design Review Board. Respectfully submitted, Approved: ~~~ Bernadette Thompson Planning Commissioner Secretary W. Steed Chairman ,.:-. - '1 I , \ MINUTE RECORD OF THE LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 1st 1981 DAY OF September, MINUTE ACTION Motlon Commission Barnhart, second Commissioner Washburn to accept minutes of July 21, 1981 as submitted. Motion Commissioner Kempe, second Commissioner Dominguezto accept the minutes of August 4, 1981 as submitted; Motion Commissioner Dominguez, second Commissioner Barnhart to ~pproved the mintues of Auqust 18, 1981 as submitted. 5-0 - ~LANS TO BE REVIEWED - 1. U. S. Rural Homes - Single Family residence loc~ted on Campus Way. Staff gave report and particulars of this 8ingle family residence. The Commission established that thisUwas a standard Plan of U. S. RuraL Homes and had no comments. Motion Board- member Kempe, secona Boardmember Dominguez to approve plans as submitted. Approved 5-0. 2. Kimball Thompson - Single family residence located on Davis Street. Staff gave report with emphasize on the structural aspects and made reference to the illustration on the Board. It was brought out that this project would maintain the in- tegrety of the street. There was some brief discussion by the Boardmembers with a motion being made by Boardmember Barnhart, second Boardmember Dominguez to approve the project as submitted. Approved 5-0. 3. Tom Minger - Addition to Commercial Structure" - Staff gave report stating that the request is for 176 square foot addition to an existing structure. Staff gave description on the addition and its appearance with a recommendation for approval as submitted. There appearing to be no problems, motion was made by Boardmember Barnhart, seconded Boardmember Washburn, the project was approved ass ubmi t ted . ..... Approved 5~.Q ~ 4. Peddlers Village - Commercial structure at the Swap Meet. Staff gave report on the new plans that have been submitted by the applicant. There was some discussion as to the plans still being a little vague. The Boardmembers made inquiry of the applicant as to the carport appearance, plywood on the front and tin roof. It was established that the location was in the tree section and that there would be further inspection done. There being no further questions or comments of the Board. Motion was made by Boardmember Barnhart, seconded Boardmenber Washburn to approve the project as submitted. Approved 5.,..0. There being no further business, motion was made by Boardmember Barnha~t and seconded by Boardmember Washburn to adjourn the regular meeting of the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board at 10:20 P.M. C~i:e:~ Bernadette Thompson Planning Commission Secretary , Approved: W. Steed Chairman ..., - - - ~INUTE RECORD OF THE LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING CO~ISSION HELD ON THE 15th DAY OF September, 1981 PLEDGE OF ALLIGENCE was given by Commissioner Dominguez. ROLL CALL found Chairman Steed, Commissioner Kempe, Commissioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart and Commissioner Dominguez. Also Present was Planning Director Morrissey, City Manager Rede and Councilman Unsworth. MINUTE ACTION Minutes were approved as submitted with the addition of Commissioner Kempe in the roll call which had been inadvertantly omitted. Motion Commissioner Barnhart, seconded Commissioner Washburn. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Housing Element (continuation) - Chairman Steed opened the Public Hearing at 7:~1 at which time he stated that this would be the final hearing on the Housing Element. There being no one in favor and no one in opposition the Public Hearing was ciosed at 7:42. Chairman Steed then addressed the table for comments. It was a general concensus of the Commissioners that recommendations be based on materials discussed in the study session, specifically sanitary and safe housing; emphasize on infill housing; perserving of neighborhood characteristics/style; conversions should be monitored i.e. condo[T'iJI.i.ums; recertification of occupancy, and; Housing Element becoming an informational base related to other elements. After brief discussion with regard to the application of these recommendations a motion was made by Commissioner Washburn and seconded by Commissioner Dominguez to approve the Housing Element with a recommendation to reflect the above topics. Approved 5-0 2. Tentative Tract Map l567q - Staff gave report of the project stating that it is a 46 Unit condominium project to be built in 12 buildings consisting of 2 to 8 units', 62 carports' and 48 open space parking spaces. Additionally, a Condrtronal Use Permit was approved on the project in 1980 with 15 conditions of appro,!al. Staff recommended approval subject to conditions. Chairman Steed opened the Public Hearing at 7:48 P.M. In favor was John Gale, the applicant, identifying himself as the developer and proponent. He expressed a willingness to answer any questions. There was concern ,by the Commissioners with regard_to the property line and the side.,. walk, Trash recepticles and limitation on trucks i.e. I ton and up. Mr. Gale statea that he had no problems with the conditions. There being no one else in favor, Chairman Steed asked if there was anyone in opposition. In opposition \Vas Larry Allen who is a resident in the area. Mr. Allen's concern was with the water pressure being too low with the construction of this project and with the construction of additional units the pre-ssure would be even less. Also -the price range of these units will bring in families with kids and it will be very dangerous for them to be so close to Grand Avenue. It was explained to Mr. Allen that before a project is started a letter of water availability must be presented to the city from the water company which will cover adequate flows to meet Fire and Health Department requirements'. After some comments from Mr. Allen with reference to his dissatisfaction with the project, there was a Mr. Glen Herb of 2729_ Quail Knolls', vlho commended Mr. Allen for his presentatinn in opposition to the project and reiterated on the unfairness of the project. Discussion was held by the Commission regarding water pressure, fire protectron, park area and design of project. Staff also amended the conditions of approval to indicated the inclusion of a lighting and landscaping assessment district on the property, After considerable. di'scussion among member:s of the Comrni'ssion and the applicant a motion was made by' Commi'ssinner Dominguez to apDrove with staff recommendatrons' and the inclusion - - ..... Minutes Planning Commission S'eptember 15, 1981 Page 2 of #20: To provide for lighting'and landscaping assessment district to be arranged with the City Engineer, second Commissioner hTashburn. Approved 5-0, 1. Applicant shall meet all requirements of the County Fire Department including providing adequate fire flow and hydrants, and providing structures with non-flammable roofing. - 2. Applicant shall meet all requirements of the City Engineer. 3. The applicant shall enclose the project with a six G6) foot high block wall of a type selected by the City Council. 4. The applicant shall submit a detailed landscape plan to the Planning Department prior to the scheduling of a review by the Design Review Board. 5. Developer shall maintain maintenance bond as required under Tract 11048..,.1 (off site improvements are existing). 6. Applicant shall dedicate water rights for the tract to the City of Lake Elsinore. 7. Applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a copy of the final condominium documents, including those portions of the CC and R "~so that apply to the conveyance of units, the assignment of parking and the management of common areas within the project before approval of the final map. 8. The CC & R's shall include a provision specifically disallowing exterior television antennas. - ~. The CC & R'~.s~all include a provision prohibiting outside uncovered and unenclosed storage of boats, trailers, R.V. 's and similar vehicles unless screened from view from public right-of-ways and trucks less than 8ft. wide. 10. CC f.~. R' s shall contain the follmving language:' "In the event the association or other legally responsible person(s) fail to maintain said common area in such manner as to cause same to constitute a public nuisance, said city may, upon proper notice and hearing, institute summary abatement pro- cedure~ and impose a lien for the costs\ of such abatement upon said common area, individual units or whole thereof as provided by law." -,11. The homeowner's association shall be established prior to the sale of the_last d~elling units~ 12. Membership in the homeowner's association shall be mandatory for each buyer and each successive buyer. - 13. Letter of water availability from EVM\^JD. 14. All improvements to be designed by developers civil engineer to the specifications of the city. 15. Provide adequate drainage,facilites. 16. Finding of no significant impact. 17. Issuance of a negative declaration. 18. Finding of compliance with present and future Elements of the General Plan yet to be adopted. 19. Provide for lighting and landscaping assessment district for oroperty. - - - ~ ~ ~ Minutes Planning Commission September 15. 1981 Pa~e 4 There being no further business the Planning Commission meeting adjourned into the Design Review Board. Approved 5-0. . ~ ....... ....... ...... ~I~ruTE RECORD OF THE LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIE1V BOARD HELD ON THE 15th DAY 01<' SEPTEMBER 1981 ~INUTE ACTION - Minutes of September 1 were reviewed and Commissioner Dominguez motioned approval of minutes as presented, seconded Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 BUSINESS ITEM 1. Proposed Street Name - Staff made presentation indicating the County Road Department's request to have the City designate the frontage road northerly of 1-15, Grape Street. This would be consistent with the name the County is using for the extension of the street through the County. Motion to approve County .request, seconded by Commissioner Hashburn. ARProved 5-0 PLANS TO BE REVIE\{ED 1. 29580 HAgue Street - Staff presented proposal for single family residence and indicated it met all requireme~ts. Discussion was neld regarding plain rear elevation of structure. Moved and seconded to accept plans as submitted. Approved 5-0 - 2. 318 and 320 Poe Street - Staff explained proposal for two apart- ment'structures with six (6) units. Discussion was held regard- ing orientation of structure to intersection and relation of the structures to one another. Discussion was held regarding Fire Department recommendations. Commissioner Dominguez requested a trash area be included as a condition of approval. Commissioner Washburn was concerned about the layout of the structures. Motion was made by Commissioner Barnhart to approve plans with staff recommendation including a trash area be provided between garage structures, seconded Commissioner "Hashburn. Approved 5-0 3. 17324 Shrier 17333 McBride - .Staff explained oroposal for two single family residences. Staff indicated the plans met all requirements. Motion was made bv Commissioner Washburn, to approve plans as sugmitted, seconded Commissioner Kempe. Approved 5-0. There being no further business The Design Review Board adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Approved: Jiw 1\1orrissey P1Clnning Commission Secretary \ft.1. Steed Chairman - . ....... ....... ....... 7'1 A~~t'-~e-~. GJl'-- cl . :, !\I(~e~ rJ\-s ~)::"'- LAKE ELSIGORE PLAN~G\CO~~lISSION DAY OF October, 1981 I , . J:lINUTE RECORD OF HELD ON THE 6th -- PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ,vas led by COJ1lJ.'1lissioner Dominguez. ROLL CALL found Chairman Ste.ed 1m issioner Dominguez, CO~'1lissioner \.Jashburn, Commissioner Barn r-b, ommissioner Kempe. /' Also present Ivas Planning Ditect:;.0"r rlorrissey, City Manager Rede and Councilman Unsworth. ~ NINUTE ACTION @' Commi s s ioner Washburn carr e c t ed the sp ell ing ;, C mis s ioner Kemp e ' s name. A motion was made by Commissioner Barn r to approve minutes as corrected, second by Commissioner Washburn Approved 5-0. PUBLIC HEARING -- 1. Special Permit 81-1 - Staff presented request to utilize an exis- ting apartment building for ambulatory and aged persons. Staff also recommended the addition of another condition at the request of the Public \~orks Director. Chairman opened public hearing re- questing those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. and Nrs. Franke indicated they were in favor of project and would be happy to answer any questions. Hearing no more in favor, Chairman asked for those opposed. There being none the hearing was closed at 7:37 PM. Commissioner Barnhardt asked whether nursing care would be provided. Mrs. Franke stated there would not be any. Dis- cussion was held regarding definition of ambulatory person. Chair- man and Commissioner i~ashburn asked questions regarding access to units, yearly review, and whether additional personnel would be hired to meet the conditions of approval. Motion Commissioner Dominguez to approve request with amended staff recommends, second Commissioner Kempe. Approved 5-0. 1. Ladder shall be provided from the second floor on the street sid of the structure. 2. Nonambulatory residents shall not be allowed on the second floor and only on the first floor when a second exit from a sleeping room to the exterior is provided. 3. All persons allowed in a room on the second floor must meet the following conditions: a. The resident is not dependent upon a mechanical aid such as a walker, cane, crutches, or a wheelchair. b. The resident is able to respond both physically and mentally to an audible or visual signal, or an oral instruction. and evacuate the building unassisted, in an emergency situation. - c. The resident is able to utilize all es~ape routes identified in the facility's fire safety/evacuation plan, this includes doors, stairs and fire escapes. d. The resident is able to ambulate without the assistance of a mechanical aid, a reasonable distance in a brief Deriod of time (i.e., evacuate the facility within 30 seconds). ~. ~>~.. . 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Ninutes of Planning Commission October 6, 1931 Page 2 4. Interior stairway is marginal and necessitates provisions 1,2, and 3 listed above. 5. All corrections per State inspection of August 1981 (1 hour fire corridor and other corridors). 6. Kitchen arrangement to be provided in accordance with Title 19 and/or Uniform Fire Code (UFC) 1979, with inspection through City Building Department. -- 7. Dining room shall provide second exit as defined by Building Code. Automatic suppression system in hood above stove. Smoke detectors in all sleeping areas and all common hallways. Emergency exit lighting to provide light when loss of power occurs, i.e., battery powered. Necessary ramps and walks, doorway, handrails, etc., for handi- capped and non-ambulatory persons shall be provided. Copy of current insurance policy to be on file at City Hall to provide copcurrence of opinion between City and OwTIer. Yearly staff review. Require a Special Inspector of the Building Department to inspect the interiors of each dwelling unit regarding heating, plumbinE- and electrical facilities so these can be upgraded to current standards if necessary. ...." Location of structure must meet current fire flows for area as required by County Department of Forestry (CDF). Installation of reduced back flow preventive devise, to be inspected by Public Works and tested by a certified back flo\v operator. 2. Conditional Exception Permit 81-8 - Staff presented request to vary from rear yard set back 3 feet. Statement was made by staff re- garding incorrect processing of application but that the applicant was not delayed because of this mistake. Chairman opened public hearing at 7:44 PM and asked those in favor to speak. Mr. Bill Campbell spoke for the applicant indicating the amount of fill which needed to be removed and area for leaching. Mr. Voigt spoke for project and pointed out the ample amount of side yard area. There being no one else in favor, chairman asked if anyone desired to speak in opposition. There being no one the public hearing was closed at 7:48 PM. Motion to approve application as submitted, second Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0. BUSINESS lvl4.TTERS ....., 1. Report on Donald A. Cotton and Associates - Staff presented report regarding consultants activities to aid City in developing its General Plan and City Council desire that the Commission report to them on their progress. Staff also updated report concerning ... .:r~. Minutes of Planning Commission October 6, 1981 Page 3 ~ status on maps for Master Environmental Assessment (MEA), element goals and policies, and land use categories. Commissioner Wash- burn spoke for Commission stating the MEA ,vas equal to the General Plan and the two work together. Commissioner Washburn indicated reasons should be given for land use categories and that the maps should be updated. Motion Chairman Steed to forward staff report to City Council and that Commissioner Washburn be designated repre- sentative of Commission to review maps and text of MEA. Approved by Concensus of Commission. 2. ANNEXATION REQUEST ~ Staff presented report regarding 13.6 acre annexation southerly of Lakeshore Drive, easterly of Terra Cotta. Staff reviewed re- port to Co~~ission and discussed pre-annexation zoning of R-1, provision of a fire station, and public services letter. Con- siderable discussion was held regarding the applicant to provide a fire station site. Commissioner Dominguez questioned whether a land swap was discussed with the applicant. Mr. Doug Kulberg spoke regarding the imposition of constructing a fire station and that costs should be shared equally be all. Considerable discussion was then held regarding cost of a fire station and facilities, fees and requests of the County Fire Department. Discussion was- also held regarding having a study session with City Council to discuss condition of approval number three (fire station). }lotion COIT~issioner Dominguez to table condition of approval #3 until study session with City Council is held and approval of other conditions of approval as listed, second Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0. 1. Provide appropriate data to City enabling service letter to be sent to LAFCO. 2. Environmental impacts shall be addressed at tract map and/or development stage of project. 3. Provide l~ acre combination fire station/park site with struc- ture and facilities as deemed necessary by the County Fire Department before final approval of annexation request. *To be tabled until joint Planning Commission/City Council study session. 4. Pre-annexation zoning of R-l (Single-Family Residence) is obtained. ~ 3. Retail and Office.Professional Commercial Center - Staff presented report regarding proposed 30,000 square feet of commercial space adjacent Lakeshore Drive. Discussion was held regarding storm drain fees and fees for traffic signal. Commissioner Dominguez questioned the City's purchase of a traffic signal previously for the intersection and why it could not be utilized. Staff corrected #6 fire hydrants to read fire hydrant(s). Commissioner Dominguez recommended condition of approval #12 (traffic signal) be tabled until study session with City Council. The Commission decided to include condition #14 and 15 to read, no significant impact on the environment, and issuance of a negative declaration. Staff recommen- ded an addendum to condition #12 be provided stating: item #12 as originally presented by staff, to become condition of approval as desired by Commission after joint Planning Commission/City Council study session. Motion Co~~issioner Kempe to amend conditon ~12 as provided by staff and add conditions 14 and 15, to staff recommen- dations second Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0. A_. Minutes of Planning Commission October 6, 1981 Page 4 1. Applicant to obtain a geologic report from a licensed pro- fessional engineer addressing: a. The significance of the fault crossing the property. b. Any problems or potential problems associated with the fault and fault depression. c. Any potential problems from this project regarding com- paction or overcovering of the soil. -- d. Structural Mitigation measures and recommendations. If a fault is determined to exist structures shall be designed to withstand the affect of such fault. If fault is deemed so severe that structures could not be erected due to movement of fault all approvals shall be null and void. 2. Applicant to meet all dedication requirements of the City Engineer for Lakeshore Drive. 3. Applicant to construct curb, gutter, commercial side\valk, and standard roadway to the City Engineer's specifications. 4. Install ornamental street lights. 5. Follo\v all recoIT@endations of the Riverside County Fire Department. 6. Provide fire hydrant(s) for fire protection as determined by the Fire Marshall. If necessary, extend and/or enlarge street mains to provide sufficient fire flow. ....., 7. Applicant to follow all recommendations of the City Engineer and all improvements are to be designed by the applicant's Civil Engineer to the specifications of the City. 8. Pay Capital Improvement Fund fees in accordance with the or- dinances and resolutions in effect at the time of issuance of building permit. 9. Applicant shall submit a grading plan to the City Engineer for approval. 10. Applicant shall submit to the Planning Department. t\VO sets of building plans with energy calculations, a letter of water availibility, a certificate of survey, and a copy of the grant deed for the property. 11. Applicant shall provide for the protection of several mature Eucalyptus trees lining the rear of the property. 12.* Applicant shall pay the following fee for each individual struc- ture before issuance of an occupancy permit for each individual structure. The fees shall be collected and placed \vithin a special fund labeled IlSpecial Traffic Signalization Constructior.. Fund" . B. Building "B" $1750.00 $17,000.00 $6250.00 A. Building IlAIl C. Building "C" -, ..;v..... ~ ~ ~ ~linutes of Planning COuillission October 6, 1981 Page 5 13. Provide block walls around project, to be approved by Planning Director as follows: A. East side of project 42 inch high wall. B. West and north side of project six (6) feet high wall ex- cept first 61 feet from Lakeshore Drive which shall provide 42 inch high wall. 14. Finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 15. Issuance of a negative declaration. ~:Item tabled until joint Planning Commission/City Council study session as indicated in minute discussion. 4. Jan and Judy's Cocktails - Staff presented report on proposed CO~ilercial use to replace burned out bar and Chinese restaurant. Chairman indicated ingress/egress on Highway 74 may be a problem. Discussion was also held regarding applicants desire to have 50 feet right-of-way width on Joy Street and curb and gutter at 40 feet. Suggestions were made regarding preventing ingress/egress from High- I~ay 74 and revising parking layout. COTmissioner Washburn also spoke to 3 foot separation between building and property line. Discussion Ivas held regarding necessity of 60 feet right-of-way and high traffic generation. Motion Commissioner Barnhart to approve with staff rec- ommendations, resolve right-of-way width on Joy Street, ingress/egress on Riverside Drive and parking, second Cowmissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0. 1. Riverside Drive - a. Dedicate to provide for 50 foot half street. b. Construct curb and gutter 38 feet from center line. c. Construct standard roadway between the new curb and street center line. 2. Joy Street - a. Dedicate to provide for 60 feet of right-of-way. b. Construct curb and gutter 20 feet from street center line. c. Construct standard roadway between the new curb and street center line. 3. Dedicate for a corner cutoff. 4. Install standard commercial sidewalk. 5. Install ornamental street lights. 6. Follow all recommendations of the Riverside County Fire Depart- ment. 7. Provide fire hydrants for fire protection as determined by the Fire Marshall. If necessary, extend and/or enlarge street mains to provide sufficient fire flow. 8. Submit plans for Riverside Drive to Caltrans. Riverside Drive is a State Highway and, therefore, the plans must be approved by the :~A. . I l-1inutes of Planning COIT"Clission October 6, 1931 Page 6 State of California Department of Transportation. And, prior to construction an encroachment permit must be obtained from that agency. 9. Pay Capital Improvement Fund fees in accordance with the ordi- nances and resolutions in effect at the time of issuance of building permit. 10. All improvements shall be designed by the o\mers Civil Engineex to the specifications of the City. -- 11. Applicant shall submit a grading plan to the City Engineer for approval. 12. Applicant shall submit a revised plot plan with staff within 2 \veeks of Commission approval to review parking layout. 13. Finding of no significant impact. 14. Issuance of a negative declaration. 5. Lakeside Builders - Staff presented application regarding 5000 square foot commercial structure to be constructed on old Rail- road Canyon Road. Discussion \vas held regarding improvements on High\vay 74 and sewage disposal. Notion Commissioner Dominguez to approve with staff recommendations, second Commissioner Barn- hart. Approved 5-0. 1. Applicant submit a revised plot plan and grading plan to the City Engineer defining to the City Engineer's satisfaction, the boundary lines of the project, and the proximity of these boundary lines to Mission Trail, Railroad Canyon Road, and the San Jacinto River. - 2. Applicant to submit a certificate of survey to the City Engineer. 3. Applicant to meet all dedication requirements of the City Engineer for Old Railroad Canyon Road and Highway 71. 4. Applicant to construct curb, gutter, commercial sideualk, and standard roadway to the City Engineer's specifications. 5. Install ornamental street lights. 6. Follo\v all recommendations of the Riverside County Fire Depart- ment. 7. Provide fire hydrants for fire protectiop as determined by the Fire Marshall. If necessary, extend and/or enlarge street mains to provide sufficient fire flow. ~ 8. Revise plot plan to provide for at least twenty (20) parking spaces. Plot plan shall be reviewed and approved by Planning Director prior to issuance of permits. 9. If the City Engineer recommends improvements for Highway 71. these plans must be submitted to Caltrans and, prior to con- struction an encroachment permit would have to be obtained from that agency. - 10. Pay Capital Improvement Fund fees in accordance with the or- dinances and resolutions in effect at the time of issuance of building permit. ...."A. .. \ .. , Hinutes of Planning Commission October 6, 1981 Page 7 11. All improvements to be designed by the m-mers Civil Engineer to the specifications of the City. 12. Finding of no significant impact. -- 13. Issuance of a negative declaration. 5. Lot Line Adjustment 81-8 - Staff presented application regarding combining three (3) lots into two (2) lots. No discussion\ was held. Notion Commissioner Hashburn to approve plan as presented,. second Commissioner Kempe. Approved 5-0. INFORH.4.TIONAL Planning Directors Report - Indicated Dan Fissori would present Design Review Board Agenda. CommissioEers Reports and Recommendations Co~~issioneT Barnhardt: Asked inspection procedures for homes below flood level. Staff indicated a program proposed in the Housing Element ,vould provide for inspection before unit was reoccupied. - Corrmissioner Washburn - Commend Code Enforcement Officer for respond- ing quickly. Between H&H Liquor and The Hreck a cracked Ivater lid in sidewalk is dangerous and should be fixed. An Edison pmver pole/ line __ has a cable extending from it at City Park and is unmarked and a hazard. Co~rnissioner Dominguez - Improvements removed at Schrivener and."Graham should be replaced. Seat portion of benches at City Park need to be re- placed. Sidewalk in front of Briarwood Mobilehome Park is being up- rooted by a tree. Suggest Public Works coordinate with OIViler to eliminate problems. At last meeting question Ivas raised regarding parking lot next to City parking lot. Would like response to the ques- tion. Co~~issioner Kempe - Requested plans submitted to Engineering Department be checked in chronological order. Hotion Commissioner Dominguez to adjourn to Design Review Board, second Commissioner Kempe. Approved 5-0. - MINUTE RECORD OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 20TH. DAY OF October, 1981 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Kempe. ROLL CALL found Commissioner Kempe, Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart, Chairman Steed. Also present was Planning Director Morrissey. MINUTE ACTION ..- Commissioner Barnhart corrected the spelling of her name. Commissioner Washburn questioned page two (2) item # 13 of the minutes. A motion was made by Commissioner Barnhart to approve minutes as corrected, second by Commissioner Dominguez. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Conditional Use Permit 81-17 - Staff presented proposal for Ultralite Aircraft to formalize and direct a recreational activity. Chairman opened public hearing requesting those in favor of the project to speak. Commissioner Barnhart, asked if any other Conditional Use Permit application was filed by Bill Barnes, another owner of Ultralight at the intersection of Lakeshore Drive and Lucerne Street. Commissioner Washburn asked if the purpose of Ultralite (trade name) was to teach flying and demostrate aircraft. Applicant stated yes, and that the training flight path area would be below the 1,260 area. Commissioner Washburn, questioned use of sales office, ground school operation and how trainee would become airborne within the property perimeter. Applicant stated that the trainees would land and take-off only on his property. Hearing no more in favor, Chairman asked for those opposed. There being none the hearing was closed at 7:55 P.M. Commissioner Washburn, was concerned about recommended length of approval time. Motion Commissioner Domingl ~, to accept staff recommendations and amending conditions # 8 and 9 to read: #8 - All operations shall occur between the hours of 8:00 A.M. a~ sunset. # 9 - Applicant and business shall be subject to review after six (6) months and return to the Commission, second Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 1. Applicant shall submit to the Planning Department, a site plan at a scale of not less than one inch equals one hundred feet depicting all facilities before any approval is given: Site plan shall include, but not be limited to the following: a. Sales office, completely dimensioned. b. Campsites. c. Parking area. d. Trash bins. e. Toilets. f. Designated aircraft operating areas. g. Storage facilities. h. Fire extinguishers. 2. Camping area shall be limited to no more than twenty (20) sites that shall be grouped together, away from aircraft operating area. Campsites shall be designed by numbered, consecutive wooden signs. 3 . Applicant shall meet all requirements of the County Fire Depart- ment. ..- 4. All trash bins and storage areas shall be effectively screened from public view. 5. All aircraft shall not be operated outside the topographical boundary elevation of 1260 MSL. 6. Entire acreage shall be enclosed by a no less than four (4) foot high wood fence approved by Planning Director. 7. All toilet facilities and any possible food serving facilities shall be reviewed by the County Health Department for approval. MINUTE RECORD OF THE LAKE ELSlNORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER~ 1981 MINUTE ACTION Minutes of October 1 were reviewed and Motion was made by Com- missioner Barnhart, seconded Commissioner Kempe... Approved 5-0. - PLANS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. U. S. Rural Homes: Single Family Residence "". Staff presented plans for 310, 312, and 314 Campus Way. It was pointed out to th~ Commission that all U.S. Rural Homes presented to Board have met the 4 in 12 roof pitch requirement. Regarding 310, 312 and 314 Campus Way, staff indicated 312 and 314 had identical i: site plans. Commission recommended site plan for 314 be iden- tical to 310 to eliminate similar structures adjacent one another: Motion Commissioner Washburn to accept site revision as modified by Commission, second Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0. 1. Applicant switch plans for 312 with 310 to provide for an alternate design. 2. Applicant to choose two trees and a drip irrigation system . for each structure. - 2. AM - PM Mini Mart: Commercial remodel old Railroad Canyon Road. Staff presented plans to remodel existing Arco filling station to provide additional food service and facilities. Staff in- dicated additional parking spaces were necessary and proposed sign was to high. Discussion was held on these items along with other minor modifications to structure. Motion Commissioner Barnhart to approve plans with staff recommendations, second Commissioner Kempe. Approved 5-0. 1. Applicant shall provide for at least thirteen (13) parking spaces including the one they have designated for handi- capped. Applicant shall present additional parking in the form of a plot plan to the Planning Department for approval. 2. Proposed free-standing sign shall not exceed twenty (20) feet in height. Applicant shall modify existing sign by three feet to conform. \ - 3. Jan and Judy's Cocktails: Commercial Building 16676 Joy Street Staff presented plans to reconstruct commercial tlSe and explained materials used. No discussion was held. Motion Commissioner Barnhart to approve plans with staff recommendations, second Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0. 1. All landscaping be provided as indicated on the plot plan. If any changes are contemplated, these must be presented in the form of an amended plot plan to the Planning Depart- ment.for approval. 2. All trees planted along Riverside Drive and Joy Street shall use a deep root control"planter to protect underground infra structure. . ""-" ~ ""-" Design Review Board October 6, 1981 Page 2 - 4. Lakeside Builders: Commercial Building old .Railroad Canyon Road. Staff presented plans to construct 5,nOO square foot commercial structure and reviewed suggested conditions of approval. No dis- cussion took place. Motion Commissioner Dominguez to approve with staff recommendations, second Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0. 1. Applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a revised plot plan showing additional required parking and landscaping as indicated below. If this plan is found inadequate by the Planning Department, the applicant must resubmit to the Design Review Board for approval. 2. Applicant shall provide at least three (3) percent of the paved areas be landscaped. Tnis shall be accomplished by an interior landscape planter that shall be seperated from the parking areas b~7 a six (6) inch Portland. cement concrete curb. 3. Permanent and automatic irrigation facilities shall be provided in all offsite and onsite planted landscaped areas. 4. All outside storage of equipment and trash shall be effec- tively enclosed by no less than a six (6) foot high opaque fence. 5. if the interior planted be& is two to four feet in width, one Crape Myrtle tree shall be planted every ten feet. If the planter is four to six feet wide, one Red Ironbark tree shall be plant~d every ten feet. If the planter is six to eight feet wide, one Holly Oak tree shall be planted every ten feet. - 6. The south and west sides of the building shall be well land- scaped using a combination of deciduous trees and intermediate shrubs. Applicant shal] provide no less than fifteen (15) London Plane or California Sycamore trees on these two sides. Between these trees, the applicant shall plant shrubs of his choice. 7. All trees shall be at least fifteen (15) gallon. 5. " John Cowles: C0mmercial Project, Lakeshore Drive. Staff presen- ted plans for commercial structure of approximately 30,000 sq. ft. Staff indicated the architecture of the project was not internally similar and varied considerably from adjacent commercial structures. Th.e Commission unanimously requested the architecture be of a Spanish motife coordinated with other adjacent commercial projects. Motion Commissioner Washburn, to resubmit architectural plans, second Dominguez. Approved 5-0. There being no further business, the Board adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Approved: - Jim Morrissey PJanning Commission Secretary W.. Steed Chairman ---- ---- ---- Minutes of the Planning Commission October 20, 1981 Page 2 8. 9. -- 10. 11. 12. All operations shall occur between the hours of 8:00 A.M. _ and sunset. Applicant and business shall be subject to reVIew after SIX (6) months and return to the Commission. Finding of no significant impact on the environment. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. Finding of compliance with present and future elements of the General Plan yet to be adopted. BUSINESS ITEM 1. Lot Line Adjustment 81-9 - Staff presents a proposal to change the orientation of two (2) commercial lots. No discussion was held. Motion Commissioner Barnhart, to approve plan as presented, second Commissioner Kempe. Approved 5-0 INFORMATIONAL Planning Directors Report - All Commissioners are invited to review and discuss maps prepared by Don Cotton, for the General Plan this Thursday. Staff has prepared an ordinance eliminating cumulative zoning and it will be placed before the Council at the next meeting. Report on increasing size of City parking lot was forwarded to the __ Council. City County/Planning Commissioners Conference will be held in Lake Elsinore next month. ~JMMISSIONERS REPORT & RECOMMENDATIONS Commissioner Kempe - None Commissioner Dominguez - Requested information on improvements on Graham Avenue. Commissioner Washburn - Planning Director to discuss flaging items with City Manager. There isn't a slow school or crossing sign on Machado Street. Huntsman Mobile Home Park needs left turn lane into park. Staff indicated if a left turn lane is put in before fully improved it will be put in the oncoming lanes of traffic. Commissioner Barnhart - Stated that there was a complaint of dirt on Chestnut and Prospect (city baricade) three (3) feet high consisting of DG and dirt. Chairman Steed - None Motion Commissioner Barnhart, to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting until November 17, 1981, and adjourn to Design Review Board, -- second Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 MINUTES OF HELD ON THE LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 20th DAY OF OCTOBER 1981 Minutes of October 6 were reviewed and motion was made by Commis- sioner Kempesecond Commissioner Dominguez to approve minutes as presented. Approved 5-0. PLANS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Butterfield Savings - Staff presented application for six (6) apartment units at the intersection of Pottery and Poe Streets. It was indicated that the plans were not in compliance with the Land Division Ordinance and the Parking Ordinance. Discussion was held regarding orientation of the buildings, access, parking and landscaping. It was discussed that desired changes (moving the buildings to provide access from Poe and needed parking) could be done at the staff level. Motion Commissioner Dominguez, to accept with staff recommendations, second Commissioner Barnhart. Approve 4 Abstain 1 ..."", Applicant shall present revised plot plan to the Planning Department for presentation to the Redevelopment Agency. Revised plan providing for primary access other than the alley, shall have at least nine (9) parking spaces. 2. Sumit Homes - Staff presented application for apartment project on Lincoln Street. Staff expressed concern over a number of de- sign elements of the project and asked for a resubmittle to run concurrently with Planning Commission Review. Motion Commissioner Barnhart to table to future date, second Commissioner Kempe. Approved 5-0. 3. Peddlers Village - Staff presented application for addition. Motion Commissioner Washburn to approve mendations, second Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0. 1. Applicant to comply with all requirements of the Building Department. commercial with staff reco- ..."", 2. Applicant to meet all requirements of County Fire Department. 3. Applicant shall provide one (1) fifteen (15) gallon Italian Stone Pine on the east and west sides of the building, and at least one Blue Pfitzer Juniper on the south, east, and west sides of the building. 4. John Cowles - Staff presented application for a commercial resub- mittle of architectural plans for 30,460 square foot project. Motion Commissioner Washburn to accept resubmittle with recommen- dations, second Commissioner Kempe. 5. Esther Stamps - Staff presented plans for single family residence. Motion Commissioner Barnhart to approve, second Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0. 6. Sumit Homes - Staff presented plans for single-family residence. Motion Commissioner Kempe to approve, second Commissioner Wash- burn. Approve 5-0. .... There being no further business, the Board adjourned. Respectfully submitted, ~4V~ Linda Grindstaff ~ Planning Commission Secretary Approved W. Steed Chairman MINUTE RECORD OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 17TH. DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1981 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Kempe. ~ ROLL CALL found Commissioner Kempe, Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart and Chairman Steed. Also present was Planning Director Morrissey. MINUTE ACTION A motion was made by Commissioner Barnhart to accept minutes as submitted, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 PUBLIC HEARING 1. Conditional Use Permit 81-16 - Staff presented a proposal for Rancho La Laguna, LTD. to use a trailer for field activities during construction of a housing tract. Chairman opened public hearing at 7:37 P.M. requesting those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. Gene Parker was present to answer any questions. Commissioner Barnhart asked if there would be a time limit, staff stated that the trailer will only be there until completion of the project. Chairman Steed asked if the trailer will be moved, Mr. Parker stated that the trailer will move back to phase two (2) area. Hearing no more in favor, Chairman asked for those opposed. There being none the hearing was closed at 7:40 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Washburn, to approve project with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Barnhart. ~ Approved 5-0 1. Approval of CUP 81-16 until completion of the condominium project. 2. Conditional Use Permit 81-18 - Staff presented proposal for Arleen Barrett to relocate a trailer as a book-keeping and care- taker's office. Chairman opened public hearing at 7:44 P.M. requesting those in favor of the project to speak. Ms. Barrett was present to answer questions and also questioned item # 3: Pay fees required by Ordinance 572, and # 4: Provide all necessary improvements and dedications as provided for in Ord- inance 572. Commissioner Washburn, asked if the trailer was displaced due to the flood and if it would be put back in the same location. Ms. Barrett stated yes and that she reviewed the location in August, 1980 and it was still partly under water. Ms. Barrett also stated that the dedication has already been provided. Mr. Dick Johnston property owner adjacent to Ms. Barrett spoke in favor of CUP 81-18. Ms. Betty Clock spoke in favor of CUP-81-18. Hearing no more in favor, Chairman asked for those opposed. Mr. Donald Bernell had no objections to the trailer being replaced, but when would they start street improve- ments on Corydon Road as they has a Conditional Use Permit in 1975 and the improvements still have not been made. Mr. Skitstrom _ raised questions about Conditional Use Permit 81-18. Hearing no more in opposition the hearing was closed at 8:02 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to forward to City Council with strong recommendation regarding items # 3,4,5,6,7,8,9, and 10, and waiver 572 fees, second Ccmnissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 1. Sewage disposal system shall be approved by the County Health Department as well as the Regional Water Quality Control Board, or the applicant shall provide sewage disposal in the form of a holding tank. 2. Applicant shall contact Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District about the time table for the development of a new waste-water disposal district for this area. At the time this new district is formed, applicant shall become a member. Minutes November 17, 1981 Page 2 2. CONTINUED 3. Pay fees required by Ordinance 572. 4. Provide all necessary improvements and dedications as provided for in Ordinance 572. 5. Provide parking for at least two (2) vehicles as required by the City Parking Ordinance. Plan must be approved by Planning Director. ... 6. Finding of conformance with present and proposed General Plan. 7. Finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 8. Issuance of a negative declaration. 9. CUP 81-18 shall apply to only one trailer. 10. CUP 81-18 shall be subject to a six (6) month review, and a one (1) year stay, if review is favorable. 3. Conditional Use Permit 81-19 - Staff presented proposal for King Videocable to use a lot in the residential district for the purpose of storing equipment for a one (1) year period. Chairman opened public hearing at 8:07 P.M. requesting those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. Lee Daniher of King Videocable was present to answer any questions by the Commission. Hearing no mor8 in favor, the Chairman asked for those opposed. Ms. Mildred Wilborn, Mr. Dom Moore and Ms. Lynn Brown spoke against CUP 81-19 stating that they did not want the area used as a storage yard due to it decreasing the value of their homes and being hazardous to their children. Correspondence was received from Mr. and Mrs. Eldwin E. Russell, Ms. Marie Beridon, Scripps Memorial and Ms. Dorothy F. McNeal, stating their concern about the area being used as a storage yard due to it decreasing the value of their homes and being hazardous to the residents. There being no more opposition the hearing was closed at 8:19 P.M. Motion Commissioner Kempe to deny due to incompatibility with zoning and economic considerations, second Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 ... 4. Tentative Tract Map 18265 - Staff presented proposal for Mr. Art Nelson to divide one acre into six (6) lots. Chairman opened public hearing at 8:25 P.M. requesting those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. Art Nelson was present to answer any questions by the Commission. Commissioner Washburn, asked if Christina Court would tie in with Barbara Way. Mr. Nelson stated yes, and that it was under construction with another project. Commissioner Washburn, questioned item # 17 of the conditions. Hearing no more in favor, the Chairman asked for those opposed. There being none the hearing was closed at 8:27 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Domingue~ to approve with staff recommendations, second Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 1. Machado Street ... a. Dedicate to provide for 44 foot half-street. b. Install curb and gutter 32 feet from street centerline. c. Construct standard roadway between new curb and street centerline. Christina Court a. Dedicate to provide for 60 feet of right of way. b. Install curb and gutter 18 feet from street centerline. c. Construct standard roadway between new curbs. Minutes November 17, 1981 Page 3 4. CONTINUED 3. --- 4 . 5. 6 . 7. 8. 9. 10. Install standard sidewalk. Install ornamental street lights. Form a 1972 Landscaping and street Lighting District over subject property. Dedicate water rights to the city. Provide "Will Serve" letter from E.V.M.W.D. (water availability). Construct sanitary sewer to serve all lots. Provide adequate drainage facilities. Comply with all the requirements of subdivision Map Act and City of Lake Elsinore Ordinance 572. 11. Project street grades to indicate how the proposed improvements will match the adjacent existing and proposed improvements. 12. All improvements shall be designed by owner's civil engineer to the specifiations of the city. --- 13. Trailers or mobile homes utilized during the construction phase of this project shall be approved by the Planning Director. 14. Applicant shall provide schedule "A" fire protection as required by the County Fire Department. 15. Applicant shall show all trees with diameters greater than four inches on the grading plan. 16. Applicant shall form an agreement with Elsinore High School District to mitigate any impact proposal may have upon that school district. 17. No trees shall be removed from site until applicant receives written authorization from the Planning Department approving such a request. 18. Applicant shall provide bonding for a drip irrigation or sprinkler system for tract. 19. Applicant shall follow all requirements of Ordinance 572. 20. Proposal is found to be in conformance with the existing General plan and all future General Plan Elements to be adopted. --- 21. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 22. Issuance of a negative declaration. 5. Tentative Tract Map 15382 - Staff presented proposal for Mr. Art Nelson to subdivide 10 acres into 42 lot single family units. Chairman opened public hearing at 8:28 P.M. requesting those in favor to speak. Mr. Art Nelson was present to answer questions by the Commission. Commissioner Kempe, was concerned about the Pine trees and trees being in the middle of the street and if a copy of the street improvement plan has been signed by the City Engineer. Commissioner Washburn, stated that he would like to see the trees remain and that Machado Street may have to be redesigned. Minutes November 17, 1981 Page 4 5. CONTINUED commissioner Washburn, requested that * 17 of the conditions be amended to read include existing trees on Machado street. Motion Commissioner Dominguez, to approve with staff recommendations and amending # 17, second commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 ... 1. Lincoln street a. Dedicate to provide for 44' half street. b. Install curb and gutter in accordance with the approved plan. c. construct standard roadway between new curb and street centerline. d. The city has designed, requested proposals and awarded contract for the improvements of Lincoln street frontage of subject tract. If these improvements are installed prior to final approval of the tract, the developer shall reimburse the city for the cost of these improvements or enter into an agreement with the city to pay his share of these improvements prior to any occupancy permits being issued. q 2. Machado street a. Dedicate to provide for 44' half street. b. Install curb and gutter from street centerline. c. construct standard roadway between new curb and street centerline. ... 3. Interior streets A, Band C. a. Dedicate to provide for 60 feet or right of way with standard cul-de-sacs at the end of each street, as required by city Engineer. b. Install curb and gutter 18 feet from street centerline and in accordance with the Riverside County standards. c. construct standard roadway between new curbs. d. proposed street A cul-de-sac exceeds the maximum length permitted by ordinance 529, and must be approved by the city council. 4. Install standard sidewalks on all streets. 5. Install ornamental street lights. 6. Form 1972 landscaping and lighting assessment district. 7. provide adequate drainage facilities. 8. provide sanitary sewer to serve all lots. 9. payoff or split any outstanding sewer bonds. .... 10. Deed to the city water rights on said tract. 11. On the similar project of Tract 13924 and 13569, it was determined that the trees on Machado street should remain. Similar conditions exist on Tract 15382. This matter shoul once again be considered by the planning commission and the city council. The locations of the existing trees will provide for a single lane traffic in one direction in that portion of Machado street; thus it will create a hazardous driving condition. Serious consideration should be given to this matter. Minutes November 17, 1981 Page 5 5. CONTINUED ..--. ~12. Provide the city with "Will Serve" letter from the water district. 13. All improvements to be designed by owner's civil engineer to the specification of the city. 14. Provide block wall as required by City Council. 15. Proposed phasing of improvements to be coordinated with City Engineer. 16. Bond for drip sprinkler irrigation system, to include existing trees on Machado Street. 17. Meet all requirements of County Fire Department. 18. Trailers or mobile homes utilized during the construction phase of the project shall be approved by the Planning Director. 19. Finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 20. Issuance of a negative declaration. ,--- 21. A finding of conformity to the existing General Plan and all future General Plan Elements to be adopted. 22. No trees shall be removed from site until applicant receives written authorization from the Planning Department approving such a request. BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Business License - Staff presented a proposal for Robert and Linda Murphy to sell and display utility trailers. No discussion was held. Commissioner Kempe, to approve as presented, second Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 ..--. 2. Lot Line Adjustment 81-10 - Staff presented proposal for Kubera Investments, Inc. to revise the lot line of three lots underlying an approved tentative tract. Chairman Steed stated that outline would make ingress/egress on Ortega Highway. Staff stated that this was correct and that it would not cause any problems. Motion Commissioner Barnhart, to approve with staff recommendations, second Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 Approval of Lot Line Adjustment 81-10 subject to the applicant revising the legal description to coincide with the alignment of the proposed flood control channel. 3. Mc Donald's Corporation - Applicant requested to be tabled so as to resubmit new plans. Motion Chairman Steed to continue this item, second Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 Minutes November 17, 1981 Page 6 BUSINESS ITEMS CONTINUED 4. William Seers - Staff presented a proposal for William Seers to build a 7200 square foot storage building for an existing lumber yard. Commissioner Dominguez, asked if a lumber yard is permitted in CP zone. Staff stated that it was not listed as an allowed use. Commissioner Washburn, asked why applicant wanted a structure for lumber if he already had a lumber yard. Applicant stated it was for an improvement of the property. Commissioner Washburn, asked if the building would block the view. Applicant stated that the building would be behind the Plaza Building and would not block the view. Motion Commissioner Dominguez to accept plan since the use was already existing, with staff recommendations, second Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 ...., 1. Applicant shall meet all requirements of the County Fire Department. 2. Applicant shall meet all specifications of the City Engineer. 3. Applicant shall meet all requirements of the Building Department. 4. An easement for storm drain and access to storm drain be dedicated along the northerly 15 feet of said property. 5. Applicant shall meet all requirements of Ordinance 572 and all other ordinances in effect at the time of issuance ..... of the building permit. 6. Finding of no significant impact. 7. Issuance of a negative declaration. 5. Guy Taylor - Staff presented a proposal by Mr. Guy Taylor to continue to use peroperty for auto wrecking or dismantling. Chairman Steed asked why applicant was granted a five (5) year permit. Applicant stated that the permit was issued so that he would not leave the valley before the five (5) years were up. Commissioner Washburn, asked how did applicant let it go past the time limit. Applicant stated that is was due to the flood and trying to keep his business going. Chairman Steed questioned the three (3) staff recommendations. Chair- man Steed suggested that Conditional Use Permit be terminated and applicant continue business with a business license. Motion Commissioner Dominguez, to delete staff recommendations, terminate CUP and issue a business license, second Commissioner Washburn. Approved !:)-O 6. County Parcel Map - Planning Commission discussed and found to be informational. -- 7. Approval of Planning Commission Minutes - approved as presented and to be forwarded to the City Council. Approved 5-0 Minutes November 17, 1981 Page 7 BUSINESS ITEMS CONTINUED - 8. Traffic Signal for Commercial Project - Planning Commission discussed and felt that since it was studied at the joint Planning Comrr.ission and City Council study session that it could be deleted. Motion Commissioner Dominguez, second Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 INFORMATIONAL Planning Directors Report - Discussed Processing of Advertising for cumulative zoning. Discussed the flip-flop plan of Mr. Bill Krouse. Discussed block walls around residential tracts. The Commission suggested that this be put together in an ordinance. COMMISSIONERS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Commissioner Barnhart - None Commissioner Kempe - Status of power poles - Lincoln and Riverside. Chairman Steed stated that the power poles would be set back. - Commissioner Dominguez - There was a school bus accident on Spring and Sumner, he would like the Public Works Department to put a warning that there is a stop sign ahead. Need to update street numbers. Staff indicated that this would have to go before the City Council and would need priority listing. Motion Commissioner Dominguez, to send before the City Council, second Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 Commissioner Washburn - One item, but will send through proper channels. Chairman Steed - None ADJOURNMENT TO DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Motion Chairman Steed to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting until December 1, 1981, and adjourn to Design Review Board, second Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 Approved - W. Steed Chairman Respectfull~Y submitted, ~ . Linda Grindstaff Planning Commission Secretary MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 17TH. DAY OF NOVEMBER 1981 Minutes of October 20th. were reviewed, Commissioner Kempe corrected item # 3 Peddlers Village, should have read Approved 4-1 with Commissioner Kempe objecting. Motion was made by Commissioner Kempe to approve minutes as corrected, second Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 BUSINESS ITEMS ... 1. Street Names for Tract 17222 - Staff presented street name for final consideration. Houses in this tract were approved by the Design Review Board on August 4th. of this year. In reviewing street names, two elements must be satisfied before the names can be considered: (1) the choices must not duplicate existing street names or cause confusion of difficulty and (2) the choices must not align themselves to existing streets thereby causing confusion. Staff believes that all critieria for designating street names has been met by the choices, Highland's Road and Lake Vista Drive. Motion Commissioner Washburn to accept as submitted, second Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 2. McDonald's Corporation - Applicant requested to be tabled so as to resubmit new plans. Motion Commissioner Dominguez to continue this item, second Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 3. William Seers - Staff presented a proposal for 7200 square foot storage building for an existing lumber yard. Motion Commissioner Barnhart to approve as submitted, second Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 4. Douglas Holmes - Staff presented application for Dr. Holmes, a ... veterinarian, to build a 1200 square foot commercial building to be used as a retail pet supply store. Dr. Holmes objected to the landscaping being selected for him. Commissioner Dominguez questioned the number of trees. Commissioner Washburn requested that the number of trees be reduced by 1/3 (minimum). Dr. Holmes questioned #2 of staff recommendation asking for a waiver until more commercial business are established. The Planning Commission stated that this would have to be issued by the City Council. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to accept with staff recommend- ations with the amount of trees to be worked out between Dr. Holmes and Staff, second Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 1. Dedicate 10' to provide for 40' half street. 2. Install curb and gutter 32' from street centerline. 3. Install standard roadway between new curb and street centerline. 4. Construct standard sidewalk. 5. Install ornamental street light. 6. Provide adequate drainage facilities. ... 7. All improvements to be designed by owner's civil engineer to the specification of the city. 8. Deed water rights to the city. 9. Applicant shall follow all recommendations of the Riverside County Fire Department. Minutes November 17, 1981 Page 2 4. CONTINUED - 10. Pay Capital Improvement Funds fee in accordance with the ordinances and resolutions in effect at the time of issuance of building permit. 11. Applicant shall submit a parking layout and landscape plan to the Planning Department prior to issuance of any building permit. 12. Parking lot shall provide for a minimum of eight (8) designated spaces. 13. plan shall provide for an interior landscape planter of no less than 160 square feet. Interior planter and planters adjacent to the building shall be separated from parking areas and vehicular access ways by a six (6) inch high Portland Cement concrete curb. 14. Interior parking planter shall contain two (2) Canary Island Pine trees. Ground covering shall be bark with no less than two (2) each Gold Coast Junipers and Mint Julep Junipers. -- 15. The applicant shall provide a minimum six (6) foot wide planter to run the length of the front elevation. The Ground cover shall be bark and contain the following plants; two (2) Holly Oak Trees, two (2) Canary Island Pine trees, and three (3) Blue Pfitzer Junipers. Adjacent to the entrance, a walkway of exposed aggregate of inlaid brick shall be provided. 16. The applicant shall line the southern boundary of the property with California Sycamore trees spaced ten (10) feet apart for a total of twelve (12). 17. The applicant shall provide for the protection of two (2) Olive trees located at the eastern boundary of the property. 18. Area of leaching shall be planted with grass. 19. All trees shall be at least fifteen (15) gallons. 20. Permanent and automatic irrigation shall be provided for all planting areas. 21. All trash areas, outside storage of equipment, and mechanical equipment shall be effectively screened from public view and shall receive written approval from the Planning Director. 22. The exterior walls and the roof shall consist of different pastel colors. -, 23. All signs shall be approved by the Planning Department. PLANS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Watt - staff presented application for single family residence. Application does not meet spacing requirements between buildings nor roof pitch or overhang. Motion Commissioner Washburn to deny as presented, second Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 Minutes November 17, 1981 Page 3 PLANS FOR CONSIDERATION CONTINUED 2. Guest - Staff presented application for single family residence. Motion Commissioner Barnhart to approve as submitted, second Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 3. Crayton - Staff presented plans (move-on). Motion Commissioner second Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 for a single family residence Dominguez to approve as submitted, -- ITEM FOR DISCUSSION 1. Street name for old Highway 71 - The Design Review Board discuss- ed a request by Commissioner Dominguez, that the Old Highway 71 be renamed Casino Road. Motion Commissioner Dominguez, second Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 There being no further business, the Board adjourned. Approved W. Steed Chairman -- Respectfully' submitted, ~~fV~~ Linda Grindstaff If) Planning Commission Secretary -- MINUTE RECORD OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 1ST. DAY OF DECEMBER 1981 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Chairman Steed. ROLL CALL found Commissioner Kempe, Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart and Chairman Steed. Also present was Planning Director Morrissey. ~ MINUTE ACTION Commissioner Washburn stated that on page 4, first paragraph should read item number 17 of the conditions be amended to read include existing trees on Machado Street. A motion was made by Commissioner Barnhart to accept minutes as corrected, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 PUBLIC HEARING 1. Tentative Parcel Map 17506 - Staff presented a proposal for Niels Jensen Construction Company, LTD. to subdivide 2.5 acres into three (3) parcels of 4.9, .9, and 1.2 acres. Chairman opened public hearing at 7:42 P.M. At applicants request staff requested that public hearing be continued to 12-15-81. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to continue this item, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 2. Tentative Tract Map 17413 Revision 1 - Staff requested that this item be continued later on during the meeting as the report was still being typed. BUSINESS ITEMS ~ 1. General Plan Mapping Activities - Discussion was held and Com- missioner Washburn recommended to Rob Steel that a meeting be set-up as soon as possible with City Manager, Donald A. Cotton and Associates, Staff, City Council and himself to discuss pro- ject. Motion Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Kempe. Approved 5-0 2. Residential Block Wall - Staff presented an ordinance imposing standard block wall design around residential projects. Staff recommended the Commission approve the concept and forward it to the City Council for approval. Motion Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Kempe. Approved 5-0 INFORMATIONAL Planning Directors Report - Discussed Jan & Judy's meeting side set back of one (1) foot. Commission approved recommendation that the set back be moved one (1) foot to meet requirements. - Director also discussed cumulative zoning to eliminate more restricted uses, Plan- ning Commission minutes, fire station fees, annexation which the City Council is to take action on. COMMISSIONER REPORT AND RECO~~ENDATION ~ Commissioner Kempe - None Commissioner Dominguez - Signs from Highway 74-perris do not give direction to downtown. Corner of Gunnerson a~d Riverside Drive the church was removed and left debris behind, can the debris be cleaned up? Commissioner Washburn - Would like to compliment the people on removing the damaged buildings around the lake. Commissioner Barnhart - Would like to thank the proper people for re- moving the mound of dirt on Chestnut Street. planning Commission Minutes Page 2 COMMISSIONER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED Chairman steed _ There is a 8 x 30 foot white trailer sitting on the back lot next to the channel where Lakeside Tire was located. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to continue meeting at the end of Design Review Board, second Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 --- PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED 2. Tentative Tract Map 17413 Revision 1 - staff presented proposal for ABC Heritage Company for a change of zoning and revised tentative map to provide more view lots and to reduce the amount of grading. The revised map will provide the following amount of lots: R-1-566; R-2-85; R-3-4. staff expressed numerous environ- mental concerns and concerns from the City Engineer regarding project having no aCcess to Railroad Canyon Road, narrow street off-sets and noncompliance with Development Agreement. Mr. Wesley Highland of Boyle Engineering was present and questioned the conditions of approval. A lengthy discussion was held and the Commission expressed many reservations regarding the project due to revisions presented and suggested that a study session with City Council, staff, and a representative from ABC Heritage be held at the earliest date possible. Motion commissioner Washburn to deny without prejudice, and a study session be set-up, second Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 There being no further business, the Board adjourned. ... Approved Whit steed Chairman Respectfully submitted, Linda Grindstaff planning Commission Secretary ... MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 1ST. DAY OF DECEMBER 1981 MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to accept minutes as submitted, second Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 BUSINESS ITEMS -- 1. Comm8rcial - California Property Exchange - Staff presented a proposal for 5600 square foot commercial building to be used for offices. Applicant requests that item number 11 be revised to provide twenty-two (22) parking spaces and that item number 12 a waiver on the block wall. The Commission stated that a letter of attachment would be required. Motion to approve with letter of attachment and staff recommendations by Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Kempe. Approved 5-0 1. Applicant to make any revisions required by the City Engineer to enable him to properly designate improvements. 2. Applicant to submit street improvement plans to the City Engineer. 3. All improvements to be designed by owner's civil engineer to the city's specifications. 4. Applicant to meet all requirements of the County Fire Depart- ment including if necessary, extension of water mains. 5. - 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Applicant's waste disposal plan shall be approved by the County Health Department and the Regional Water Quality Board. Construct standard commercial sidewalk. Install ornamental street lights. Provide adequate drainage facilities. Deed water rights to the city. Pay Capital Improvement Fund Fees in accordance with the or- dinances and resolutions in effect at the time of issuance of building permit. 11. Applicant shall submit a revised site plan providing for a minimum of twenty-two (22) parking spaces. plan showing parking revisions and designating landscaping shall be sub- mitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of building permit. 12. Applicant to construct a six (6) foot high block wall to run the length of the southern property line. - 13. Applicant shall coordinate trees and shrubs in planting areas with the,Planning Department and shall designate these trees on the site plan. 14. Areas of leaching shall be planted with grass. 15. Applicant shall plant a minimum of twelve (12) California Sycamore trees on the south and east sides of the structure to provide for natural insulation. 16. All trees shall be at least 15 gallons. Design Review Board Minutes Page 2 17. Permanent and automatic irrigation facilities shall be pro- vided for all planting areas. 18. Interior planters and planters adjacent to the building shall be seperate from parking areas by a six (6) inch high concrete curb. 19. All trash areas, outside storage of equipment and mechanical roof equipment shall be effectively screened and shall receive written approval from the Planning Director. --- 20. All signs shall be approved by the Planning Department. 21. All trees adjacent to right-of-ways shall use Deep Root Control Planters. 2. Commercial - Kay's Bar - Staff presented proposal for a 1440 square foot commer~cal building to be used as a tavern, which would replace a building previously destroyed in a fire. Ms. Jordan was present and requested a waiver on curb and gutter until Caltrans has completed road improvements on Riverside Drive. Commission stated that this would require a letter of attachment. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve with letter of attachment for curb and gutter and with staff recommendations, second Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 Approval of Commercial building subject to the following: 1. Riverside Drive - a. Dedicate to provide for 50 foot half street. b. Construct curb and gutter 38 feet from center line. c. Construct standard roadway between the new curb and street center line. 2. Install eight (8) foot wide standard commercial sidewalk. --- 3. Install ornamental street lights. 4. Follow all recommendations of the Riverside County Fire Department. 5. Provide fire hydrants for fire protection as determined by the Fire Marshall. If necessary, extend and/or enlarge street mains to provide sufficient fire flow. 6. Submit plans for Riverside Drive to Caltrans. Riverside Drive is a state Highway and therefore the plans must be approved by the California Department of Transportation. And prior to construction an encroachment permit must be obtained by that agency. 7. Pay Capital Improvement Fund Fees in accordance with the ordinances and resolutions in effect at the time if issuance of building permit. 8. All improvements shall be designed by the owner's civil engineer to the specifications of the city. 9. Provide adequate drainage facilities as required by the City Engineer. -- 10. Deed water rights to the city. 11. Applicant shall submit to the Planning Department, a landscape plan indicating types of trees and shrubs and permanent, and automatic irrigation facilities. This shall be done before the issuance of any building permits. Design Review Board Minutes Page 3 12. All trees shall be at least 15 gallons. 13. Trees adjacent Riverside Drive shall use Deep Root Control Planters. - 14. All trash areas, outside storage of equipment and mechanical equipment shall be effectively screened and shall receive written approval from the Planning Director. 15. Sewer system below the elevation of 1270 shall be flood-proofed and approved by the Building Department. 16. All signs shall be approved by the Planning Department. PLANS FOR CONSIDERATION Single Family Residence - Ruffulo - Staff presented application for a single family residence. Motion Commissioner Dominguez to approve as submitted, second Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 Single Family Addition - Hahnran - Staff presented applicantion for a single family addition. Motion Commissioner Kempe to approve as submitted, second Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 There being no further business, the Board adjourned back to the Planning Commission. -- Approved W. Steed Chairman Res~s~ Linda Grindstaff ~ Planning Commission Secretary -- MINUTE RECORD OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 15TH. DAY OF DECEMBER 1981 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Barnhart. ROLL CALL found Commissioner Kempe, Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner Barnhart and Chairman Steed. Commissioner Washburn was absent. Also present was Planning Director Morrissey. MINUTE ACTION A motion was made by Commissioner Barnhart to approve minutes as submit- -- ted, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 4-0 PUBLIC HEARING 1. Conditional Exception Permit 81-10 - Staff presented a proposal for Mr. Alan Williams to vary ten feet from the required front yard set- back and 17 feet from the required rear yard setback. Chairman opened public hearing at 7:37 p.m. asking those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. Alan Williams was present and stated that after receiving staff's recommendation of denial, he felt it was unfair to him, because the area in which his proposal is to be built is a very old subdivision and undeveloped. A long discussion ensued regarding the type of set-backs the City wanted and various regulations. Chairman Steed asked Mr. Williams if he was aware of the Plumbing Code adopted in 1979. Mr. Williams stated that he was not aware of this Plumbing Code. Chairman then asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak in favor of this project. There being none he asked for those opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 8:02. Motion by Com- missioner Dominguez to deny without prejudice and applicant to get with staff for guidence and revise plan and if possible to submit revised plans at the next meeting, second by Commissioner Kempe. Approved 4-0 ..." 2. Tentative Tract Map 18239 and Conditional Use Permit 81-20 - Staff presented a proposal for Steve Cavanaugh & Associates for a one lot subdivision of 14 condominium units on 26,300 square feet adjacent an identical project. Chairman opened public hearing at 8:14 p.m. requesting those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. Steve Cavanaugh indicated he was present to answer any questions. Chairman asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak in favor of the project, there being none he then asked for those opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 8:15 p.m. Commissioner Kempe questioned the green area and density. Commissioner Barnhart questioned # 17 of the conditions, asking if the trailer on phase 1 would be utilized on the 2nd phase? Mr. Cavanaugh stated that the same trailer would be used. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Kempe. Approved 4-0 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 18239 1. Dedicate to provide for 32' half street. 2. Install curb and gutter 20' from street centerline. ..." 3. Construct standard roadway be~ween new curb and street center- line. 4. Construct standard sidewalk. 5. Install ornamental street light. 6. Install sanitary sewer to serve property. 7. Dedicate water rights to the city. 8. All improvements to be designed by owner's civil engineer to the specification of the City. Minutes of the Planning Commission Page 2 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 18239 CONTINUED 9. 10. --- ll. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Provide adequate drainage facilities. Comply with all requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department. Comply with Uniform Fire Code 13.301. Pay all applicable fees at building permit stage. Provide a letter of water availability. Meet all requirements of Ordinance 572. Finding of no significant impact upon the environment. Issuance of a negative declaration. Trailers or mobile homes utilized during the construction phase of this project shall be approved by the Planning Director. A finding of conformity to the existing General Plan and all future General plan Elements to be adopted. 19. Provide for lighting and landscaping assessment district for property. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81-20 - 1. Applicant shall construct the proposed condominium project in accord with the requirements of the Design Review Board. 2. All exterior lights necessary for the subject buildings and property be placed and fixed so as not to shine out onto any adjacent structure in the subdivision or any surrounding development in any manner so as to provide a nuisance or hazard to road traffic or affect the living environment of the area. 3. CC & R' s shall contain the following language, "In the event the association or other legally responsible person (s) fail to maintain said cornmon area in such manner as to cause same to constitute a public nuisance, said City may, upon proper notice and hearing, institute summary abatement procedures and impose a lien for the costs of such abatement upon said cornmon area, individual units or whole thereof as provided by law. " 4. The homeowner's association shall be established prior to the sale of the last dwelling units. 5. Membership in the homeowner's association shall be mandatory for each buyer and each successive buyer. 6. Applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a copy of the final condominium documents, including those portions of the CC & R's that apply to the conveyance of units, the assign- ment of parking and the management of cornmon areas within the project before approval of the final map. The Planning Department and City Attorney shall approve and record said CC & R's. 7. That all roof-maintained or ground-supported structures and equipment incidential to the development be architectually screened so that they are not visible from the neighboring property or the public street, with such screening subject to approval of the Design Review Board. Minutes of the Planning Commission Page 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81-20 CONTINUED 8. Except for strictly interior modifications to individual units, no substantial structural alterations, except for incidental maintenance, shall be made to any of the existing residential or common areas, unless plot plans and elevations are submitted to the Planning Department and a finding of substantial confor- mance is made. 9. Parking shall be covered and uncovered as indicated on the approved plot plan and all signs shall conform to the City's sign ordinance. ....., 10. Applicant shall comply with all noise level regulations of the City. 11. Project shall comply with all applicable ordinances of the City. 12. Applicant shall enclose the project with a six (6) foot high blockwall of a type selected by the Planning Director. 13. Payoff or split any outstanding sewer bonds. 14. CC & R's shall include a provision specifically disallowing exterior television antennas. 15. The CC & R's shall include a provision prohibiting outside uncovered and unenclosed, storage of boats, trailers, recreational vehicles and trucks more than one ton of load capacity. 3. Conditional Use Permit 81-6 - Staff presented a proposal for Mr. Paul Bennett,to re-locate a trailer at Skylark Airport for the purpose of vending food. Chairman opened public hearing at 8:16 ....., p.m. asking for those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. Paul Bennett, was present to answer any questions. Chairman asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak in favor of the project, there being none he asked for those opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 8:20 p.m. Motion by Commissioner Kempe to approve with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 1. Sewage disposal system shall be coordinated with the Building Department to ascertain feasibility of utilizing existing system. If existing system is not adequate applicant shall work with the Building Department to coordinate action with the Regional Water Quality Control Board, County Health Department and Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District as necessary to provide, adequate sewage disposal. 2. Provide parking for at least three (3) vehicles as required by City Parking Ordinance. plan must be approved by the Planning Director. 3. Finding of conformance with present and proposed General Plan. 4. Finding of no significant impact upon the environment. ....., 5. Issuance of a negative declaration. 6. CUP 81-6 shall apply to only one trailer. 7. CUP 81-6 shall be subject to a six (6) month review, and a one (1) year stay, if review is favorable. Minutes of the Planning Commission Page 4 ~ 4. Tentative Parcel Map 17506 - Staff presented a proposal for Niels Jensen Construction Company, LTD. to subdivide 2.5. acres into three (3) parcels of 4 , .9, and 1.2 acres. Chairman opened public hearing at 8:22 p.m. requesting those in favor of the project to speak. There being no one in favor, he then asked for those who oppose. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 8:23 p.m. At applicants request staff reguested that the matter be tabled until a future date. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to table until future date, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Conceptual Approval Zero Lot Line - Personal Investment - Staff presented proposal for R-l Zero Lot Line concept. Mr. Jim Kincannon the architect for the project was present to discuss the project with the Commission. Chairman Steed questioned units A & C of the blueprint, wanting to know if the strip between the houses would be covered or remain the same? Mr. Kincannon stated that the strip would have to be covered to meet the Fire Department's Code. Staff asked if an ordinance would be required for this pro- ject, and Chairman Steed stated than an ordinance would not be required and to keep it as an individual item. Motion by Com- missioner Barnhart to approve, second by Commissioner Kempe. Approved 4-0 2. Berk McCollum Co. & Gonsalez Corp - Staff presented a proposal for Berk McCollum Co. & Gonsalez Corp. for a phased Multi-family and Commercial project consisting of four residential structures, and one commercial. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 4-0 ~ 1. Dedicate to provide for 40' half street right-of-way for Lake- shore Drive. 2. If necessary as determined by the City Engineer, applicant shall dedicate for Mohr Street. 3. Applicant shall submit street improvement plans to the City Engineer for construction of curb and gutter, standard road- way, and standard sidewalk for each phase. Phase 4 shall include street improvement plans for Lakeshore Drive as well as Mohr Street. 4. All improvements to be designed by owner's civil engineer to the specifications of the City Engineer. 5. Applicant shall submit a grading plan for the entire project and plan shall provide adequate drainage facilities as deter- mined by the City Engineer. 6. Applicant to meet all requirements of the County Fire Depart- ment including if necessary, extension of water mains. 7. Install ornamental street lights. ..--- 8. Install sanitary sewer to serve property. 9. Dedicate water rights to the City. 10. Pay Capital Improvement Fund fees in accordance with the ordinance and resolutions in effect at the time of issuance of building permit. Minutes of the Planning Commission Page 5 11. Before issuance of building permits, applicant shall submit to the Planning Department CC & R's providing that the entire 25,000 square foot project shall remain under one ownership. The CC & R's shall also provide rules for residential as well as commercial tenants, and interaction between both. These rules shall include performance standards for the commercial tenants in regard to the rights of the residential tenants and performance standards for the residential tenants in regard to the rights of the Commerical tenants. r 12. CC & R's shall include a provision specifically disallowing exterior television antennas. --- 13. CC & R's shall include a provision prohibiting outside un- covered and unenclosed storage of boats, trailers, recreational vehicles and trucks with more than one ton of load capacity. CC & R's shall also prohibit tenants from parking any of the above on adjacent public right-of-ways. 14. Applicant shall provide a six (6) foot high block wall for the west property line to be approved by the Design Review Board. 15. Project shall comply with all applicable ordinances of the City. 16. Applicant shall comply with all noise levels regulations of the City. 17. Parking shall be covered and uncovered as indicated on the approved plot plan and all signs conform to the City's sign ordinance. 18. Except for strictly interior modifications to individual units, no substantial structural alterations, except for incidental maintenance, shall be made to any of the exist- ing residential or common areas, unless plot plans and elevations are submitted to the Planning Department and a finding of substantial conformance is made. --- 19. That all roof-maintained or ground-supported structures and equipment incidental to the development be architecturally screened so that they are not visible from the neighboring property or public street, with such screening subject to approval of the Design Review Board. 20. All exterior lights necessary for the subject building and property be placed and fixed so as not to shine out into any adjacent structure in the project or any surrounding development in any manner so as to provide a nuisance or hazard to road traffic or affect the living environment of the area. 21. Applicant shall construct the proposed apartment project in accord with the requirements of the Design Review Board. 22. Provide a geologic study to the Planning Department before completion of the first structure to ascertain relationship of project to adjacent fault. --- 23. Finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 24. Issuance of a negative declaration. 25. A finding of conformity to the existing General plan and all future General plan Elements to be adopted. Minutes of the Planning Commission Page 6 BUSINESS ITEMS CONTINUED 3. Design Review Presentation - Staff recommended the Commission discuss and approve design review criteria for presentation of plans to the City Councilor Redevelopment Agency for action. Discussion was held and the Commission felt that ID was not appropriate. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve with the deletion of ID, second by Commissioner Kempe. Approved 4-0 ~ 4. Lot Line Adjustment 81-14 - Staff presented a proposal for Fritz Neumann to revise the design of the two (2) existing parcels. Motion by Commissioner Kempe to approve conditioned upon the applicant submitting a legal description, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 4-0 5. County Parcel Map - No action taken. 6. Eliminating Cumulative Zoning - Discussion was held and staff stated that this item will be before the Commission again on 1-5-82 for approval and will also request approval of four (4) specific ordinances: Manufacturing Ordinance; Commericalj Manufacturing Ordinance; Hillside Planned Development Ordinance, and; Condominium Ordinance. The Commission accepted the report as informational. INFORMATIONAL ,-- Planning Directors Report - Staff stated that the survey submitted to residents last winter has come back and has been collated and wanted to know if the Commission would like copies. The Commission stated that they would like copies of the survey~ Staff mentioned the Annexation meeting on 12-16-81 stating that the Commission was invited to attend, also a study session for Canyon Lake Hills on 1-4-82. The CDC meeting would be held on 12-16 at 7:30 a.m. which the Com- mission is invited to attend. Discussion was held on Zone Change request received from the Riverside County Planning Department. The Commission requested that staff handle this item. Staff asked if the Design Review criteria considered by the Commission could be passed to the City Council at the next meeting, the Commission stated that it could be forwarded to the City Council with the elimination of ID. Staff also asked if Lot Line Adjustment 81-14, could also be reviewed by the Agency at the next meeting, the Commission stated that they had no problem with this going before the Agency at their next meeting. Conditional Use Permit 81-6 will go immediately before the City Council on 12-22-81 for final approval. COMMISSIONER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Commissioner Dominguez - Sign from Highway 74 - perris do not give direction to downtown. Need more signs showing direction to down- town. Commissioner Barnhart - At night you cannot see street stripping at Central and traffic traveling southerly on Central towards Collier may runoff the road unless reflectors are provided. ,.-- Commissioner Kempe - Would like a copy of Street plans for Machado Street showing what is to be done about going around the trees. Staff stated that the design was similar to a tract near Machado Park and were available from the Engineering Department. Commissioner Washburn - Absent. Chairman Steed - At Central and Collier would like to have stripping for thru traffic. Minutes of the Planning Commission Page 7 Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Kempe. Approved 4-0 Approved Whit Steed Chairman -- :;;::;:lY r::' Linda Grindstaff ~ Planning Commission Secretary -- ..., MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 15TH. DAY OF DECEMBER 1981 MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to accept minutes as submitted, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 ~ BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Berk McCollum Co. & Gonsalez Corp. - Staff presented a prvposal for a phased multi-family and commercial project consisting of five structures, landscaping and parking. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve with staff recommendations, second by Com- missioner Kempe. Approved 4-0 1. Applicant shall provide landscaping as indicated on site plan; all trees shall be minimum fifteen (15) gallon. 2. All landscape areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler systems. 3. All trees planted adjacent to right-of-ways shall use Deep Root Planters. 4. All signs shall be approved by the Planning Department. 5. All planters adjacent parking areas shall be seperated by a six (6) inch high concrete curb. 2. Revised Conditions of Approval - Butterfield Savings - Discussion was held and a Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve with -- the deletion of the 2-1/2 foot block wall, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 4-0 PLANS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Steve Cavanaugh & Associates - Staff presented a proposal for 14 Condominium units on 26,300 square feet. Motion by Commissioner Kempe to approve with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 1. Applicant shall provide either a wood fence of a type approved by the Planning Department or a hedge of way-leaf privet to seperate parallel parking spaces from Building 2. 2. Applicant shall provide landscaping as indicated on site plans, also landscaping shall include a minimum of fifteen (15) fifteen gallon trees selected from the Planning Department's list of indigenous trees. 3. All landscape areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler systems. ~ 4. All signs shall be approved by the Planning Department. 2. Butterfield Savings - Staff presented a proposal for two triplex buildings on adjacent, 9,000 square foot lots. Motion by Com- missioner Dominguez to approve with additional landscaping and staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Kempe. Approved 4-0 1. Applicant shall provide fire protection as determined by the County Fire Department prior ro construction. 2. Applicant shall meet all requirements of the City Engineer for: a. provision of adequate drainage facilities. b. Recordation of requirement easements. c. Street improvement plans. d. Sidewalk Minutes of the Design Review Board Page 2 3. Applicant shall provide a six (6) foot high block wall for the southern property line. 4. Trash area, roof mounted and ground maintenance equipment _ shall be effectively screened and approved by the Planning Director. 5. Landscaping shall be coordinated with the Planning Department and trees for Langstaff and Pottery shall be picked from City Tree list. - 6. Applicant shall plant no less than three (3) California Sycamore trees adjacent to the western side of each building to provide for natural insulation. 7. All trees shall be at least 15 gallon. 8. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler systems. 3. Art Nelson - Staff presented proposal for 39 houses for Tract 18048 and 18265. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Kempe. Approved 4-0 Approval of house plans as submitted, subject to the applicant meeting all setback requirements. 4. U. S. Rural Homes - Staff presented application for four (4) U.S. Rural homes. The Commission was concerned about the homes being identical and staff is to check and make sure that they are not identical. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 4-0 - 5. Single-Family Residence - Schiavone - Staff presented application for two (2) single-family residenc~ Motion by Commissioner Kempe to approve with staff recommendations, second by Com- missioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 There being no further business the regular meeting of the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board was adjourned at 10:00 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart, second Commissioner Kempe. Approved Whit Steed Chairman ;Z::l~~ Linda Grindstaff /# Planning Commission Secretary -