The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01-04-1983 NAH MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 4TH. DAY OF JANUARY 1983 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Saathoff. ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart and Chairman Steed. MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve minutes as submitted, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 Chairman recognized Councilman Larry Knight in the audience. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 1. Conditional Exception Permit 82-6 - Mobil Oil - Staff presented proposal for a Conditional Exception Permit to vary from the height requirements of the City's Sign Ordinance; required height is 20 feet, requested height is 50 feet. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:37 P.M. Asking for those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. Don Robbins, representing Mobil Oil was present and requested the identification sign (condition number 2) be changed from 134 square feet to 145 square feet in area. Chairman then asked if there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor of the project. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:40 P.M. Discussion was held on height requirements and visual impact. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Condi- tional Exception Permit 82-6 with staff recommendations and amendments, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 3-2 with Commissioners Saathoff and Washburn opposed. 1. Sign shall be placed at location identified on the site plan. 2. Sign shall be utilized for identifying Mobil Oil Service Station only and shall not exceed 145 square feet in area. 3. Sign shall not exceed a height of 50 feet. 4. Issuance of a Categorical Exemption. 5. A finding of conformance to existing and proposed General Plan. -- 2. Conditional Use Permit 82-10 - Intercontinental Oil - Staff pre- sented a request from the applicant for a continuance of Conditional Use Permit 82-10 to the meeting of January 18, 1983. The public hearing was opened at 7:54 P.M. and closed without anyone present speaking in favor or in opposition. Chairman expressed concern over the number of continuances and wanted to know if the applicant had been informed as to how many continuances he was allowed before having to re-submit. Staff stated that the applicant had been informed that this would be the last continuance, after this one he would have to re-submit. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to continue Conditional Use Permit 82-10 to the meeting of January 18, 1~83, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 3. Conditional Use Permit 82-11 - Edward Snyder - Staff presented pro- posal for a Conditional Use Permit to expand an existing Ultralight aviation park and to enable on-site camping (incidental camping). Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:57 P.M. Asking for those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. Edward Snyder was present and highlighted the intent of the park and stated he would answer any questions the Commission may have. Chairman then asked if there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor of the project. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, Minutes of Planning Commission January 4, 1983 Page 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82-11 - EDWARD SNYDER CONTINUED the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 8:00 P.M. Commissioner Dominguez asked Mr. Snyder if he had received a copy of the condi- tions? Mr. Snyder stated that he had not received a copy of the conditions. The Commission recommended this item be continued --- until after the Business Items, so that Mr. Snyder could review the report. BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Industrial Project 82-4 - Lester Dillinger - Staff presented a request from the applicant for a continuance of I 82-4 to the meeting of January 18, 1983. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to continue I 82-4 to the meeting of January 18, 1983, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 2. Commercial Project 82-6 - Intercontinental Oil - Motion by Com- missioner Barnhart to continue C 82-6 to the meeting of January 18, 1983, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 3. Commercial Project 82-9 - Mobil Oil - Staff presented proposal for a three (3) bay self-service gasoline station, snack shop and accompanying facilities. Approximately.6 acres north of Mission Trail, south of Frontier Road and west of Railroad Canyon Road. Discussion was held on applicant providing a dump station (~dded as condition number 20). Mr. Robbins, representing Mobil Oil, questioned conditions 1,2,8 and 13. Discussion was held on conditions 1,2,6,8, 12 and 13, and applicant providing six (6) parking spaces (added as condition number 21). Motion by Com- missioner Saathoff to approve Commercial Project 82-9 with staff recommendations and amendments, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 --- 1. ~~t~t~~t~/~~tt~~t~t/~~t~t~~~/~~~t~~/~~~~/t~~t~~~/~~t~~~I DELETED. 2. ~~~~~~t~/~tty~~~t/~~/,t~~tt~t/~~~~/~~/t~t/~~~t~t~t/~~ p~_-t~~~I/~~t/~~t/~~~~/t~~~/J~/t~~~/~~~~1 DELETED. 3. Construct 200 foot long Railroad Canyon Road median strip as indicated on site plan, subject to approval from the City Engineer. 4. Construct full street improvements to City standards for half -street; 110 feet wide Railroad Canyon Road, 100 feet wide Mission Trail, and 80 feet wide Frontier Road. Curb to property line distance on Railroad Canyon Road and Mission Trail shall be 12 feet and on rontier Road, 8 feet. Construct full width sidewalks. 5. Provide necessary striping for bicycle path along Mission ___ Trail and Railroad Canyon Road. 6. Relocate any utilities underground where feasible and other existing improvements necessary to construct improvements. 7. Install ornamental street lighting. 8. Participate in equitable portion of the cost to signalize the intersection of Railroad Canyon Road and Mission Trail. Minutes of Planning Commission January 4, 1983 Page 3 COMMERCIAL PROJECT 82-9 - MOBIL OIL CONTINUED ~ 9. Provide drainage facilities as required by the City Engineer. 10. Make all the necessary arrangements with E.V.M.W.D. to be tied into the Regional sewage treatment plant system. 11. All improvements to be designed by owner's registered civil engineer. 12. Meet requirements of the County Fire Department. 13. Participate in the assessment district when formed or sign agreement to be assessed for the construction of San Jacinto River bridge on Lakeshore Drive. 14. Staff recordation of CC & R's as required by City Council. 15. All conditions of both the Planning Commission and Design Review Board to be met prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. Any changes from the plans, other than those required by the Commission and Design Review Board necessitate re-submittal. ~ 16. Provide additional planting adjacent to the northwest corner of the property and 150 square feet of planting adjacent to the snack shop. 17. Meet all requirements of Ordinance 572. 18. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. l~. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. 20. Applicant to provide a dump station. 21. Applicant to provide six (6) parking spaces. ~ PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82-11 - Edward Snyder Mr. Snyder questioned the number of dealers to be allowed to operate out of the park, stating the figure was only an estimate and then questioned conditions 1, 2 and 3b. Discussion was held on the above conditions, policing ultralight activities, sales revenue being returned to the city and conditions under Title 25. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to continue Conditional Use Permit 82-11 to the meeting of January 18, 1983, so that review of the above concerns may be addressed by both the applicant and staff, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT None PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Commissioner Saathoff - None Commissioner Dominguez - The structure on Gunnerson does staff have a report on what action can be taken by the City? Staff stated a report will be prepared and presented at the next meeting. Minutes of Planning Commission January 4, 1983 Page 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED Commissioner Washburn - When will the consultant complete the final General Plan? Staff stated it will be completed in six (6) weeks according to the consultant. Was staff able to find anything out on the request for the name change of Frontier Road? Staff stated a report will be prepared and presented to the Commission. -- Commissioner Barnhart - None Chairman Steed - There is a billboard adjacent to Commissioner Dominguez's residence (Lakeshore Drive) which was damaged by the wind. storm, since the City does not allow repair of billboards the billboard should be removed. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 -- ..... MINUTES OF :LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 4TH. DAY OF JANUARY 1983 MINUTE ACTION ~ Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve minutes as submitted, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Multi-Family - 405 West Heald - Community Development Corporation - Staff presented a request from the applicant for a continuance of this project to the meeting of January 18, 1983. Motion by Com- missioner Barnhart to continue Multi-Family Project to the meeting of January 18, 1983, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 2. Industrial Project 82-4 - Lester Dillinger - Staff presented a request from the applicant for a continuance of I 82-4 to the meeting of January 18, 1983. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to continue I 82-4 to the meeting of January 18, 1983, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 ~ 3. Commercial Project 82-9 - Mobil Oil - Staff presented proposal for site approval for a gasoline service station, snack shop and accompanying facilities. Discussion was held on signage, and archi- tectural theme. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to deny without prejudice and have staff send a letter to Mobil Oil requesting a Spanish theme. Chairman questioned the denial stating this pro- ject could be approved and then instruct staff to send a letter requesting a Spanish theme be submitted for staff review and approval. Commissioner Barnhart withdrew her motion. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve C 82-9 with a condition to staff that the applicant submit a re-design, illustrating a Spanish motif of the structure which is to be brought back before the Design Review Board for review, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Addendum to motion to include a copy of the letter to be sent to Mobil Oil. 4. House Plans for Tract 14706 - Thompson Investment Company - Staff presented for approval house plans for Tract 14706 located at Machado Street adjacent to Leach Canyon Road. Staff stated plot plan mix meets all ordinance and setback requirements and no two identical plans will be placed side by side or across from each other. Also, there is a pending Lot Line Adjustment involving lots 16, 17 and 18, which must be approved, therefore approval of the house plans must be contigent upon approval of the Lot Line Adjust- ment. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve with staff recommendation, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 1. Approval of Lot Line Adjustment 82-7. There being no further adjourned at 9:24 P.M. Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 business the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board Motion by Commissioner Dominguez, second by Approved Whit Steed Chairman Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Linda Grindstaff Planning Commission Secretary MINUTES OF LM,E ELSINORE PLANNING COm~ISSION HELD ON THE 18TH. DAY OF JANUARY 1983 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Chairman Steed. ~ ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Dominguez, Com- missioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart and Chairman Steed. Also present was Community Development Director Trevino. MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve minutes as submitted, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Zone Change 82-13 - Southern Pacific Land Company - Staff presented proposal for a zone change of .6 acres of property between I-IS and Frontier Road from R-l (Single-Family Residence) to C-l (Limited Commercial). Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:32 P.M. Ask- ing for those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. Fred Crowe, representing Southern Pacific Land Company, was present and spoke in favor of the project and stated he would answer any questions the Commission may have. Chairman then asked if there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor of the project. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:33 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Zone Change 82-13 with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 ..... 1. Applicant shall submit a legal description for the entire property to be zone changed accepted as accurate by the Engineering Department. 2. Adoption of an ordinance by the City Council enacting the zone change. 3. Finding of conformance to the General Plan. 4. Finding of no significant impact. 5. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. 6. Proposed zone change will not inhibit the locality from providing required or necessary housing within the com- munity. 7. Dedicate water rights to City of Lake Elsinore. ..--- 2. Conditional Use Permit 82-10 - Intercontinental Oil - Staff pre- sented proposal for a conditional use permit to construct a carwash and gasoline facility. Also, staff informed the Commission that the applicant was present and wished to address the Commission. Chair- man opened the public hearing at 7:35 P.M. Asking for those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. Richard Fromme (applicant) re- quested the Commission deny without prejudice so that they can get together with staff and work out the problems. Chairman then asked if there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor of the project. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:36 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to deny without prejudice, second by Com- missioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 Minutes of Planning Commission January 18, 1983 Page 2 3. Conditional Use Permit 82-11 - Edward Snyder - Staff presented proposal for a conditional use permit to expand an existing Ultralight Aviation Park and to enable on-site camping (incidental camping). Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:38 P.M. Asking for those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. Edward Snyder was present and spoke in favor of the project. Chairman then asked __ if there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor of the project. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:40 P.M. Discussion was held on expiration date of CUP 81-17, moving on another temporary building (office space) to provide room for additional Ultralight dealers, and the number of camp sites, with no more than 34 incidental camping sites added as condition number 8. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Conditional Use Permit 82-11 with staff recommendations and amendments, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 1. Sign an agreement to participate in the estimated cost of $ 35,000.00 to improve Luce~ne Street from Lakeshore Drive to elevation 1265. 2. Applicant to pay capital improvement fund fees of $ 2,960.00 for the camp sites prior to the issuance of any business licenses. 3. Prior to issuance of business license or camping permits, applicant shall submit to the Planning Division a statement containing a description of the facilities to be provided for the use of campers and a statement of the proposed use of the incidental camping area, which shall include: ..- aL Approximate dates of occupancy, or a statement that the facility is intended to be operated year-round. bl Type of use intended, including use of recreational vehicle for camping purposes, if any. c). Number and type of sanitary facilities. d} Maximum number of camping parties to be accom- modated at anyone time. e} Evidence of approval from Health and Fire Departments. 4. Application shall be subject to a one-year review. 5. Finding of conformance to the General Plan. 6. Finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 7. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. ..- 8. No more than 34 incidental camping sites. 4. Conditional Use Permit 82-13 - Chris Blood - Staff presented pro- posal for a conditional use permit for a trailer to be used as a caretaker's residence for boarding stables. Staff also informed the Commission that a letter had been received from the applicant stating there has been a misunderstanding. The travel trailer Minutes of Planning Commission January 18, 1983 Page 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82-13 - CHRIS BLOOD CONTINUED ~ parked on the property is not the one intended for a caretaker's residence, it is part of a business, therefore staff requests a continuance so that this matter may be resolved. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:53 P.M. and closed the public hearing at 7:54 P.M. without anyone present speaking in favor or opposition. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to continue Conditional Use Permit 82-13 to the meeting of February 1, 1983, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Lot Line Adjustment 82-6 - Roberta Thomas - Staff presented pro- posal for a lot line adjustment to create two (2) lots by re- aligning an existing lot line. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Lot Line Adjustment 82-6 with staff recommendation, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 1. Applicant moving the easterly side yard lot line of Lot 1 westerly a distance of five (5) feet. 2. Commercial Project 82-6 - Intercontinental Oil - Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to deny without prejudice, second by Com- missioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 ..... 3. Industrial Project 82-4 - Lester Dillinger - Staff requests this item be continued to the meeting of February 1, 1983, so that the applicant and staff can discuss concerns regarding the project. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to continue Industrial Project 82-4 to the meeting of February 1, 1983, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 At this time the Community Development Director requested the Planning Commission review and approve in concept only Tract 14706. This map was approved by the Planning Commission in June 1979 and the City Council in July 1979. This map was never built and consequently efforts are now being made to build this tract with some modifications. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Tract Map 14706 in concept only, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 CO~~UNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT ..... Co~~unity Development Director presented reports on the following items: 1. Non-conforming billboard sign on west Lakeshore Drive. 2. Uncompleted building at 16364 McPherson. 3. Street name change for Frontier Road to Casino Drive and street name change for Old Railroad Canyon Road to San Jacinto Road, stating a resolution will be prepared and presented to the Design Review Board for approval. Minutes of Planning Commission January 18, 1983 Page 4 COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Commissioner Saathoff - None Commissioner Dominguez - None Commissioner Washburn - Didn't the City buy another road grader, so that if something happened to one the roads could still be maintained? There are a number of roads that need to be graded. Staff requested a list of the roads needing maintenance be pre- pared. ... Commissioner Barnhart - The alley behind City Hall g01ng up to Chestnut needs to be graded. When will the new zoning books and maps be ready? Staff stated they should be completed in about four (4) weeks. Chairman Steed - None Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 ... ... MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 18TH. DAY OF JANUARY 1983 MINUTE ACTION -- Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve minutes as submitted, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Industrial Project 82-4 - Lester Dillinger - Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to continue Industrial Project 82-4 to the meeting of February 1, 1983, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 There being no further adjourned at 8:18 P.M. Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 business the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board Motion by Commissioner Washburn, second by - Approved Whit Steed Chairman Respectfully submitted, Li~~:S~~ Planning Commission Secretary .--. MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 1ST. DAY OF FEBRUARY 1983 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Community Development Director Trevino. ,-- ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Dominguez, Com- missioner Barnhart and Chairman Steed. Commissioner Washburn was absent. Also present was Community Development Director Trevino. MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve minutes as submitted, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Conditional Use Permit 82-13 - Chris Blood - Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to continue Conditional Use Permit 82-13 to the meeting of February 15, 1983, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 4-0 2. Conditional Use Permit 83-1 - Harvey & Company - Staff informed the Commission that the applicant has requested a continuance to the meeting of February 15, 1983. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to continue Conditional Use Permit 83-1 to the meeting of February 15, 1983, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 - 3. Conditional Use Permit 83-2 - Michigan Armament Marketing, Inc. - Staff presented proposal for a Conditional Use Permit to manufacture small arms and test firing at 135 Sumner Street. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:31 P.M. Asking for those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. Jeff Pierce, President of Michigan Armament, was present and questioned conditions la, 2, 3 and the ordinance preventing firing of guns within the City Limits. ~1r. Jerry Stewart spoke in favor of the project and requested that approved firing range be added as a condition of approval. Chairman then asked if there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor of the pro- ject. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:46 P.M. Discussion was held on conditions of approval. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Conditional Use Permit 83-2 with staff recommendations and amendments, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 1. Meet the following requirements of the County Fire Department. a) All live ammunition will be kept in a pre-determined area. -- b) Applicant will post a no "Smoking Sign" in the gun assembly room. c) Applicant will post a "Live Ammunition" sign on the outside door of the assembly/ test-fire building. d) Application shall be subject to a yearly inspection by the Fire Department. Minutes of Planning Commission February 1, 1983 Page 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-2 - MICHIGAN ARMAMENT CONTINUED 2. Meet requirements of the County Sheriff's Department. a) t~~p~~tt~~/~~~/~ppt~1~~/~t/~~~~ttti/~i~t~~~J DELETED. bl $~~~ttti/~~~t~/~~/pt~~t~~~/~~tt~~/~~~/~~~f __ ~p~t~tt~~/~~~t~J DELETED. 3. Applicant shall consolidate all armament operations (except test firing room) into one building within one (1) year of City approval. 4. Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to a one-year approval and permanent status thereafter. 5. A finding of conformance to the General Plan. 6. Issuance of a Categorical Exemption. 7. Test firing range for Company manufactured weapons. BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Industrial Project 82-4 - Lester Dillinger - Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to deny without prejudice, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 ... COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT None PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Commissioner Barnhart - The alley behind City Hall going up to Chestnut, did staff have anything to report on what is happening with the grading? Staff stated there has been discussion on this, but would have to get back with the information. Commissioner Dominguez - None Commissioner Saathoff - Asked staff to reply on the Fire Department's requirements regarding some applicants being required to upgrade water lines for fire flow and others being exempt. Staff stated this was due to existing structures versus new structures. Chairman Steed - None Commissioner Washburn - Absent Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to adjourn to Design Review Board, by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 secon ... MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 1ST. DAY OF FEBRUARY 1983 MINUTE ACTION ,..-- Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve minutes as submitted, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 4-0 BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Industrial Project 82-4 - Lester Dillinger - Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to deny without prejudice, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 2. Accessory Building - 17561 Sunnyslope Avenue - Don Patton - Staff presented proposal for a 1,200 square foot Gambrel barn. The accessory building meets all setback requirements. Motion by Com- missioner Dominguez to approve accessory building as presented, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 3. Resolution changing the names of Frontier Road and Railroad Canyon Road. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Resolution as presented, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 - There being nO-further adjourned at 8:28 P.M. Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 business the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board Motion by Commissioner Barnhart, second by Approved Whit Steed Chairman - Respectfully submitted, L=dS~ Planning Commission Secretary MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 15TH. DAY OF FEBRUARY 1983 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Barnhart. ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Dominguez, Com- r- missioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart and Chairman Steed. Also present was Community Development Director Trevino. MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve minutes as submitted, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS ~ 1. Conditional Use Permit 82-13 - Chris Blood - Staff presented pro- posal for a caretaker's residence for boarding stables on 12.47 acres on Baker Street east of Pierce. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:35 P.M. Asking for those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. & Mrs. Blood were present and spoke in favor of the project and questioned conditions 4 and 5. Chairman then asked if there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor of the project. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:40 P.M. Discussion was held on applicant providing corrals or additional stabling for horses, storage of feed and grain, water availability, sanitary facilities, the number of horses to be on the property, on-site storage, signage and conditions number 4 and 5. Motion by Com- missioner Barnhart to approve Conditional Use Permit 82-13 with staff recommendations and amendments, second by Commissioner Do~inguez. Approved 5-0 1. The applicant shall submit to the Design Review Board a detailed plot plan at a reasonably large scale to show placement of one (1) trailer, parking, landscaping and all use of the subject property. 2. Application shall be subject to a one (1) year review and a three (3) year stay. 3. Camping shall be prohibited. 4. Applicant shall pay all capital improvement fund fees for the trailer on a prorated basis. 5. Sign an agreement with the City Engineer if and when use becomes permanent to construct street improve- ments for Baker Street and Pierce Street. 6. A finding of conformance to the General Plan. ~ 7. Issuance of a Categorical Exemption. 2. Tract 14706 Amendment - Thompson - Staff presented proposal to amend Tract 14706 to provide an improved circulation pattern and lot lay- out on a 5.52 acre parcel east of Machado Street, south of Dolly Drive, north of Leach Canyon Flood Control Channel. Staff stated a letter has been received from Mr. Fred Crowe indicating he would submit for our review the proposed lot line adjustment of lots 15, 16,17,18 and 19 of the aforementioned tract. The success of this would be contingent upon the following four proposals: The first would be vacation of Lake Crest Drive right- of-way within the redesigned boundary of lots 16 and 17. Minutes of Planning Commission February 15, 1983 Page 2 Tract 14706 Amendment Continued The second would be the vacation of the south 15 feet of the existing 40 foot wide sewer easement in Lake Crest Drive. This would facilitate more flexibility in building layouts for lot 16. The third suggestion would be placement of a 12 foot wide concrete spillway on the northerly-12 foot of the existing sewer easement. This would allow for excellent control of even the most extreme flood conditions. -- Finally, we feel that if the street names within the tract were to be renamed, it would eliminate any confusion on the direction of entry to addresses on Lake Crest by the fire or police departments. We would like to suggest that Lake Crest be re- named Mari Drive and Garretson Lane be renamed Marcia Court. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:58 P.M. Asking for those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. Fred Crowe was present, representing Mr. Thompson, and spoke in favor of the amendment and stated he would answer any questions the Commission may have. The Chairman then asked if there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor of the project. There being no one else pre- sent wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 8:02 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Amendment of Tract 14706 with staff recommendations that it is aesthetically pleasing, better circulation and land planning, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 .... 3. Conditional Use Permit 83-1 - Harvey & Comapny - Staff presented proposal for a Conditional Use Permit to allow three (3) off-site advertising structures at the following locations; Lakeshore Drive and Machado, Collier and Central and the Freeway and Collier. Chairman opened the public hearing at 8:06 P.M. Asking for those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. Bill Knorr of Harvey & Company was present and spoke in favor of the project. The Chair- man asked if there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor of the project. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 8:10 P.M. Discussion was held on a time limit being set, requesting the permit after the signs are already up, a bond to cover the cost of removing the signs if not taken down after expiration of Conditional Use Permit. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Conditional Use Permit 83-1 subject to bonding arrangement with the City that the signs be removed on or before June 1, 1983, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 3-2 with Commissioner Dominguez and Barnhart objecting. .... 4- Conditional Use Permit 83-3 - Hodges & Steele - Staff presented pro- posal for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a vehicle storage yard at Main Street and Flint Street. Chairman opened the public hear- ing at 8:23 P.M. Asking for those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. & Mrs. Pollock spoke in favor of the project. Mr. Bob Steele was present and spoke in favor of the project. The Chairman asked if there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor of the project. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 8:32 P.M. Discussion Minutes of Planning Commission February 15, 1983 Page 3 Conditional Use Permit 83-3 Continued was held on use being impound yard only, cleanliness, requesting permit after the use is already in and upgrading the area. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Conditional Use Permit 83-3 with the condition that it come back for yearly review and that the use does not go with the land and subject to Design Review approval of plot plan illustrating landscaping, detailed outline of parking stall if there is one for the towing vehicle, lighting for the gate area and agree to no dismantling on the site whatsoever, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-1 Commissioner Dominguez objecting. ,...-.. Conditional Exception Permit 83-1 - Steve Kirtides - Staff presented proposal for a Conditional Exception Permit to vary from the requirements of the City's Parking Ordinance. Chairman opened the public hearing at 8:53 P.M. Asking for those in favor of the pro- ject to speak. Mr. Leonard Davidson, Ms. Jean Loose, Mr. Kirtides and Mr. Frank De Pasquale spoke in favor of the project. The Chairman then asked if there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor of the project. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 9:00 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Conditional Exception Permit 83-3 with staff recommendations, second by Com- missioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 5. - 1. A finding of conformity to the General Plan. 2. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 3. Issuance of a Categorical Exemption. BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Commercial Project 83-1 - Steve Kirtides - Staff presented proposal for site approval for a 2,450 square foot restaurant to be located at the northeast corner of Main Street and Heald Avenue. Staff informed the Commission that condition number 2 would be changed to three (3) feet instead of five (5) feet. Motion by Commissioner ,Saathoff to approve Commercial Project 83-1 with staff recommenda- tions and amendments, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 l. 2. 3. -- 4. 5. ~ 7. 8. 9. Dedicate fifteen (15) feet on Main Street. Dedicate three (3) feet on Heald Avenue. Dedicate corner cut per County Standard # 805. Construct improvement according to the requirements of the City Engineer. Meet requirements of Ordinance 572. Meet requirements of the Design Review Board. Recordation of Redevelopment Agency CC & R's prior to plan check. Applicant shall screen all trash and storage area. All facilities shall be constructed as approved on site plan. Minutes of Planning Commission February 15, 1983 Page 4 Commercial Project 83-1 Continued 10. All signs shall conform to the City's Sign Ordinance and shall be issued prior to being erected. 11. All utilities shall be placed underground. ....,; 12. All roof mounted or ground support equipment incidental to the development shall be architecturally screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets screening subject to approval of the Design Review Board. 13. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 14. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. 2. Resolution of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District - Staff informed the Commission that this item has been removed from the agenda. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT None PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Commissioner Saathoff - Is it possible for staff to predetermine capital improvement fees, cost shares of lighting, street improve- ment, signalization, etc. so that the applicant is aware of the costs and that we are aware of the costs and we are aware of the fact if the applicant can or can't live with it. Staff stated that we will come back with any fees anytime there are fees involved showing how the fees were arrived at and then show the costs. -- Commissioner Dominguez - There is a billboard going up right at San Jacinto River Road and the highway, do they have a permit, or is this something that we will see after the fact? Commissioner Washburn - Concur with Commissioner Saathoff. It would be nice if the applicant knows roughly what the costs would be or at least a formula breakdown. Commissioner Barnhart - Didn't the City buy a machine to make signs? Wants to know what happened to our street sign machine and why aren't they making street signs. Chairman Steed - There is a business in operation at North Main Street, I was just wondering what type of business and if they have a business license. I noticed that the Code Enforcement Officers were next door to me checking them out for license, etc. and I commend them for that. I think that this is good and a step in the right direction. -- ~tion by Commissioner Washburn to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 15TH. DAY OF FEBRUARY 1983 MINUTE ACTION - Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve minutes as submitted, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Commercial Project 83-1 - Steve Kirtides - Staff presented pro- posal for site approval for a 2,450 square foot restaurant to be located at the northeast corner of Main Street and Heald avenue. Mr. Kirtides was present and questioned condition number 2. Discussion was held on condition number 2, landscaping, architectural design, textured sidewalks, ornamental lighting, the six (6) foot high block wall, bike racks and newspaper racks, marking Heald Street red all the way down to the alley and on the other side marking it all the way down to the entrance of the parking lot. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Commercial Project 83-3 with staff recommendations including the block wall to be four (4) feet along the property line and alley with a recommendation from the Commissioners that Heald Avenue on both sides (alley on one side and entrance to the park- ing lot on the other side) be painted red and posted or signed no parking, tow away area, two (2) ornamental street lamps at the entrance of the project walking area and textured sidewalks at the entrance way, second by Commissioner Dominguez. - 1. Three (3) foot wide landscape planter to run the length of the building's two street frontages. 2. Design shall be consistent with the Cal Poly Downtown Study. 3. Landscape plan shall include at least five (5) fifteen gallon trees with remainder of plantings to be approved by staff. 4. Permanent and automatic irrigation facilities for all planting areas. 5. The block wall to be four (4) feet along the property line and alley. 6. Two ornamental street lamps at the entrance of the project walking area and textured sidewalk at the entrance way. There being no further business the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board adjourned at 10:00 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 _. Approved whit Steed C1'1airman Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Linda Grindstaff ~ Planning Commission Secretary MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 1ST. DAY OF MARCH 1983 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Washburn. ;.-. ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Washburn, Com- missioner Barnhart and Chairman Steed. Commissioner Dominguez was absent. Also present was Community Development Director Trevino. Chairman introduced Mike Norton as the new City Planner and John Riley as the new Assistant Engineer. Chairman recognized Councilman Larry Knight in the audience. MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve minutes as submitted, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Tentative Parcel Map 17616 - California Property Exchange - Staff presented request to have Tentative Parcel Map 17616 continued to the meeting of March 15, 1983. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:34 P.M. There being no one present wishing to speak in favor or opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:35 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to continue Tentative Parcel Map 17616 to the meeting of March 15, 1983, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 - 2. Redevelopment Project Area No.2 - Staff presented for approval the Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 along with the Environmental Impact Report (E.I.R.). Staff requested that number 2 of the recommendation be changed to: Adopt attached Resolution approving the Preliminary Plan. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:36 P.M. There being no one present wishing to speak in favor or opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:37 P.M. Discussion was held on the commercial fee of $0.15. Staff stated that this fee was per square foot. Commissioner Saathoff recommended that the words "square foot" be added. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to forward Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 by issuance of Resolu- tion to the Redevelopment Agency, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 BUSINESS ITEMS None COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT None PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS commissioner Saathoff - None Commissioner Washburn - None Commissioner Barnhart - On Graham there is a barricade over a hole in the street without a flashing yellow light. The barricade should have a yellow flashing light. Chairman Steed - None Commissioner Dominguez - Absent Motion by Commissioner Washburn to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 1ST. DAY OF MARCH 1983 MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve minutes as submitted, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 BUSINESS ITEMS None ..., There being no further adjourned at 7:48 P..M. Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 business the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board Motion by Commissioner Washburn, second by Approved Whit Steed Chairman ;;::11~~ Linda Grindstaff ~ Planning Commission Secretary ..., ...., MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 15TH. DAY OF MARCH 1983 THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:35 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Washburn. .r- ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Dominguez, Com- missioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart. Chairman Steed was absent. Being as Chairman Steed was absent Commissioner Dominguez conducted the meeting. MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve minutes as submitted, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Tentative Parcel Map 17616 - California Property Exchange - Staff presented request to have Tentative Parcel Map 17616 continued to the meeting of April 5, 1983. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to continue Tentative Parcel Map 17616 to the meeting of April 5, 1983, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 BUSINESS ITEMS. 1. Lot Line Adjustment 83-2 - Bob Williams - Staff presented proposal for a Lot T4ine Adj ustment for .four (4) lots , south of Cas ino Dr i ve, north of Mission Trail, west of Railroad Canyon Road. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Lot Line Adjustment 83-2 with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 - 1. Verification of the accuracy of all legal descriptions. 2. Issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. 2. Lot Line Adjustment 83-3 - Fermin Diaz - Staff presented proposal for a Lot Line Adjustment moving the lot line between two (2) existing parcels, at the southwest corner of the intersection of Pottery Street and Campus Way. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Lot Line Adjustment 83-3 with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 1. City Engineer acceptance of all documents as accurate. 2. Issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. -. 3. Phasing for Tract 18239 - Steve Cavanaugh - Staff presented phas- ing plan for a one lot subdivision of ten (10) condominium units, located at Joy Street between Riverside Drive and Machado Street. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to allow applicant to have Certi- ficate of Occupancy on the four (4) units nearing completion subject to applicant completing all off sites as indicated in the original conditions of approval and lot to be kept clean, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 Minutes of Planning Commission March 15, 1983 Page 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT None PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Commissioner Barnhart - There is a barricade on Kellogg Street without -- a flashing yellow light. Staff stated that the barricade has a flash- ing light but sometimes they get hit or knocked down. Commissioner Washburn - Tract Maps going past the deadline for renewal, recommend that the City Council add an expiration date on conditions of approval or documents the developer receives, so that the developer knows when the initial Tract Map will expire. Commissioner Saathoff - None Commissioner Dominguez - The process for single-family residences is to long, is there something that we can do to make it simple for the average person coming in and wanting to build? Commissioner Saathoff requested that staff provide the Commissioners with a guideline (flow chart) of the single-family process and illus- trate normal time lines. Chairman Steed - absent Motion by Commissioner Washburn to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 ... ... MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 15TH. DAY OF MARCH 1983 MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve minutes as submitted, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Resolution Changing the name of Kuhns Street to Railroad Canyon Road South - Staff presented a petition received from property owners along Kuhns Street requesting that this street be re- named to Railroad Canyon Road South.. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to recommend to City Council to change the name of Kuhns Street to Railroad Canyon Road South, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 There being no further business the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board adjourned at 8:10 P.M. ,Motion by Commissioner Washburn, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 - Approved Whit Steed Chairman Resz.: ):~ Linda Grindstaff ~ Planning Commission Secretary MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 5TH. D~ OF APRIL 1983 THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:28 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Community Development Director Trevino. ~ ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart and Chairman Steed. MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve minutes as submitted, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Tentative Parcel Map 17616 - California Property Exchange - Staff presented request to have Tentative Parcel Map 17616 continued to the meeting of April 19, 1983. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:30 P.M. Being as there was no one present wishing to speak in favor or opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:31 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to continue public hearing of Tentative Parcel Map 17616 to the meeting of April 19, 1983, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 2. Conditional Exception Permit 83-2 - Winchester Associates - Staff presented proposal for a Conditional Exception Permit to reduce ~ required rear yard setback requirements by two (2) feet; 15 feet required; 13 feet requested. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:32 P.M. Asking for those in favor of the project to speak. There being no one present wishing to speak in favor, the Chair- man then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:34 P.M. Motion by Comm~siane~ Dominguez to approve Conditional Exception Permit 83-2 with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 1. A finding of conformity to the General Plan. 2. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 3. Issuance of a Categorical Exemption. ..... 3. Conditional Use Permit 82-10 & Commercial Project 82-6 - Inter- continental Oil Company - Staff presented proposal for a CO~di~ tional Use Permit and site approval for construction of a c~rwa$h facility to be located on Lakeshore Drive between Machado Street and Riverside Drive. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:37 P.M. Asking for those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. Richard Fromme (applicant) was present and spoke in favor of the project. Mr. Fromme also asked for clarification on condition number 15. Mrs. Barbara Vail spoke in favor of the project. There being ho one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. Mr. Ronalds spoke in opposition, stating that he lives right behind the proposed car- wash and was concerned about the waste disposal and noise level. If there are reasonable hours it would probably be alright but most operations are open 24 hours and cannot see this type of operation that close to residential property. Mr. Earl Pemperton spoke in opposition stating the property adjoining this proposal on both sides is professional commercial and this type of operation in the middle of it is a kind of junking of a town and that he does not think we should do anymore in Elsinore. Mr. Pemperton also stated a concern about the percolation in that area. There being Minutes of Planning Commission AprilS, 1983 Page 2 Conditional Use Permit 82-10 & Commercial Project 82-6 Continued no one else present wishing to speak in opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:55 P.M. Discussion was held on signalization of the intersection of Machado or Lakeshore whichever is appropriate, hours of operation, and waste water disposal. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Condi- __ tional Use Permit 82-10 and Commerical Project 82-6 with staff recommendations and adding conditions number 16 and 17, which reads: Condition number 16: Hours of operation to be from 7:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M. Condition number 17: Applicant to participate in the signalization of the intersection of either Machado or Lakeshore whichever is appropriate, second by Com- missioner Dominguez. Approved 3-2 Commissioner Washburn abstaining - Commissioner Saathoff opposed 1. Dedication of 25' right-of-way - Lakeshore classified as arterial highway 110' right-of-way. 2. All streets, sewer, water, storm drain, improvement plans as required by City Engineer. 3. Soils report, grading plan. 4. All Building and Capital Improvement fees required by Ordinance 572 and all Public Safety fees required by Resolution 83-4. 5. Compliance to City Codes and State Map Act. -- 6. Relocate utilities. 7. Meet requirements of County Fire Department. 8. Applicant to sign agreement to participate in the Four- Corners storm drain extension for the applicant's frontage. 9. Eastern driveway to be designated for egress only and western driveway for ingress only. 10. Provide five (5) foot landscape planter adjacent to and within the front property line along the entire frontage except driveways. 11. Applicant to provide five (5) foot planter adjacent entire length of rear property line. 12. Applicant to submit landscape plan and site elevations to the Design Review Board. 13. A finding of conformance to the General Plan. A finding of no significant impact. -- Issuance of a Negative Declaration. Hours of operation to be from 7:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M. 14. 15. 16. 17. Applicant to participate in the signalization of the intersection of either Machado or Lakeshore whichever is appropriate. Minutes of Planning Commission April 5, 1983 Page 3 BUSINESS ITEMS ..... 1. Commercial Project 82-6 - Intercontinental Oil Company - See Conditional Use Permit 82-10 under public hearings. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT Community Development Director Trevino requested guidance on a request for a palm reader in a C-l zone ( 1507 Lakeshore Drive) this designation does not specifically list palm reading. This was discussed with the City Attorney and he feels this use is similar to other uses in the C-l District. Discussion was held on parking. Staff stated ample parking could be provided. It was the consensus of the Planning Cqwmission that this item be deferred to City Council. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Commissioner Barnhart - None Commissioner Saathoff - None Commissioner Washburn - None ..... Commissioner Dominguez - On Flagstaff there are some Pepper Trees in the City right-of-way, one of the trees has a large broken limb that should be removed. Chairman Steed - None Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 5TH. DAY OF APRIL 1983 MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve minutes as submitted, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 BUSINESS ITEMS - 1. Single-Family Residence - 680 Lake Street - Schiavone - Staff presented proposal for a single-family residence to be located at 680 Lake Street. Proposal meets all ordinance requirements. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve single-family residence as presented, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 2. Single-Family Residence - 801 Parkway - Alongi - Staff presented proposal for a single-family residence to be located at 801 Parkway. Proposal meets all ordinance requirements. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve single-family residence as presented, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 3. Single-Family Residence - 16908 Bell Avenue - Roybal - Staff presented proposal for a single-family residence to be located at 16908 Bell Avenue. Proposal meets all ordinance requirements. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve single-family residence as presented, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 There being no further adjourned at 8:29 P.M. , Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 business the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board Motion by Commissioner Barnhart, second by - Approved Whit Steed Chairman Respectfully submitted, ~ Linda Grindstaff Planning Commission Secretary - MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING CO~~ISSION HELD ON THE 19TH. DAY OF APRIL 1983 THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:34 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Saathoff. -- ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Washburn, Com- missioner Barnhart and Chairman Steed. Also present was City Planner, Mike Norton. MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve minutes as submitted, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 Commissioner Dominguez arrived late. PUBLIC HEARINGS The Chairman recommended for expedient purposes that the public hearing on the Lakeshore Overlay District Ordinance be moved to the first item on the agenda. -- 1. Lakeshore Overlay District Ordinance - Staff presented an ordinance adding Chapter 17.65, Lakeshore Overlay District to the Municipal Code providing criteria for development, uses and activities within the lake shoreline area to enhance and preserve the natural re- sources of said zoning district. This woul~_encompass lakeshore property frOm'Iowa Street southeasterly to Country Club Boulevard. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:45 P.M. Asking for those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. Herbert Houghtaling asked how come you went down to Iowa Street and not take it up to the dike? Chairman stated that this question would have to be answered by the Committee who drafted the proposed ordinance. Mr. Houghtaling stated that he would like to have the boundary changed from Iowa Street to Nebraska Street. Mr. Paul Baccus wanted to know why an environmental report was not necessary. Chairman stated that an environmental report was not required for what is being proposed for the Overlay Plan. . . Why the location, I don't understand why not encompass the whole lake and then work on one area at a time? Chairman stated the ordinance will cover the whole thing, all it will do later is expand the area. Why hasn't this been placed in Chapter 17.36 instead of building a new chapter for it? Staff stated that it is easier to implement using a new piece of legislation rather than adding amendments on __ to existing Municipal Codes. Mr. BacCus stated that the main base of the lake botton is clay and allowing grazing of hoofed animals should be reviewed very carefully. If a hoofed animal gets caught in the mud and goes up to it's knees then they are there, the only way you can get them out is with block and tackle or winch. Mr. Patrick Callahan - Asked how this effects the people who live there? Commission stated that there is no problem with existing residences. You say I can't put a fence up, park a boat or a car there. Commissioner Dominguez stated that the ordinance is just a guide, whatever you wish to put down at the lake all you have to do is come over and ask for it and then we can tell you what you can and Minutes of Planning Commission April 19, 1983 Page 2 cannot put. This will apply if you are. going to construct something new. Mr. Callahan recommended that fences under water be marked with buoys. Mr. Alexander Randolph stated he had a place down on Nebraska and they put a dam across right in front of his house. - Mr. Dwayne Knutson stated that he did not believe the Overlay was advertised correctly. This is actually a change in zoning and asked if this had been advertised as a zone change? The Commission stated that this had not been advertised as a zone change and was not a zone change. Mr. Harvey Andreson asked if his property west of Iowa street was included in the Overlay District? The Chairman stated that the boundary is from Iowa easterly. Ms. Ollie Drazenovich stated she received information from a staff member stating this ordinance was to change the zoning to Zone R around the lake. Mr. Bob Cissna stated he opposed this ordinance because it is a bill of attainder whereby the city is trying to depress the pro- perty values and totally in disregard of private property rights. It restrains trade in order to establish a monopoly for public owned mari'nas ~ This ordinance outlaws the putting in of fences to protect private property from vandals, litter and control. It also prevents people from being able to plant trees if they have a diameter of two inches. __ Mr. Cissna asked who drew up this ordinance and if the state Park had any input? Commissioner Dominguez stated that a committee of citizens, staff and the city attorney drew up the ordinance and the state Park did not have input. Ms. Oma Slavick questioned the 30 foot setback on Lakeshore Drive. Stating they own the 41 acres just past the Holiday Trailer Park and would like to suggest that they be eliminated from the Overlay if it doesn't pertain to their commercial recreation or to stipu- late that they are not included in any 30 foot setback. Mr. Houghtaling stated that 17.65.80 of the ordinance where it says to clean up the lake, all of this was included in 1980 and every- thing below 1265 comes under that right now. Mrs. Houghtaling asked how do we go about changing a thing like that? Chairman stated that it may have to be re-drafted. Mrs. Richard Snyder stated they have a lot on Lakeshore which can't be built on but they've done nothing for the last four years except_ clean up the trash and that they are definitely against the ordinancE Mrs. Drazenovich asked why nothing has been done to the channel, why don't you get the channel open and the filthy water out of the lake?- Bob Cissna stated that the outflow channel was 1250 and is not 1260 and right now water is pouring into the lake from the culverts at Graham Avenue which means the culverts at Graham have been set above 1260 and they are effectively damning up the lake. Fred Crowe stated that there seems to be some confusion on the part of the public as far as the limits of the lands that are covered in this hearing. It seems that some people on the streets in between Minutes of Planning Commission April 19, 1983 Page 3 ~ the limits of the area that are not included within the limits of this hearing. Some say it goes from Line Street to Kansas. I wonder if it is on a map or in word description? Chairman stated in the ordinance it states Iowa, originally it stated Iowa to Lucerene but was changed to Country Club being the cut off point. ~ Mrs. Betty Knutson stated this is down zoning and asked if there is any other property that the city owns around the lake and is there a possibility that you can start working on that property and let us see how you clean it up? Mrs. Knutson also stated that you don't tell people that they can't put fences up on their property. Commissioner Dominguez stated that this will be done on a case by case and if they build a commercial building and they want a fence all they have to do is ask what type of fence they can put up. Mr. Fred Stokes spoke in opposition stating that everything said tonight has not effected the Commission and believes that they have already made up their minds. Chairman recommended that those with concerns write them down and directed to staff and have a study session and incorpora~e those concerns within the proposed ordinance. The public hearing was closed at 9:15 P.M. ~ . Motion by Commi~sioner Washburn to continue Lakeshore Overlay District Ordinance to a future date, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 Commissioner Washburn moved that the Planning Commission adjourn for a five minute recess, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 The Planning Commission reconvened at 9:25 P.M. ~ 2. Tentative Parcel Map 17616 - California Property Exchange - Staff presented proposal for a commercial subdivision of 11 acres into 3 parcels. Chairman opened the public hearing at 9:28 P.M. Asking for those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. Fred Crowe was present representing California Property Exchange and questioned a number of the conditions. The Chairman recommended the conditions be reviewed one at a time after the public hearing is closed. Chairman asked if there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 9:33 P.M. Discussion was held on conditions 1 through 19. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff .to approve Tentative Parcel Map 17616 with the deletion of condition number 1,4,5,6,8,9,11,13 and 18 (the Commission felt that these conditions were more appropriate at development stage), condition number 2 changed to read: Record CC & R's indicating the 100 year flood plan as a notice to future buyers, the 100 year flood plain to be determined by the Federal Insurance Rate Map that it is an environmental sensitive area with certain restrictions as shown on this plan (General Plan) dated December 14, 1982, condition number 12 changed to read: Applicant to participate in lighting and land- scaping and street assessment district for the three parcels, condi- tion number 17 changed to read: Applicant to participate by agreement equitabily in signalization to mitigate traffic safety impact, condi- tion number 19 changed to read: Applicant shall not place non-approved fill/materials within the 100 year flood plain, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 Minutes of Planning Commission April 19, 1983 Page 4 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 17616 CONTINUED 1. ~~~~/~tt~t/~t/~~~t~~tt~~/t~/t~~/~ttt/~t/~~~/pt~p~ttt~~/~~~~~ t~~/~~~/t~~t/r~~~~/~~~t~/~~/~~t~~lt~~~~/~t/r~~~~/t~~~t~~~~/ R~t~/~~pil//t~li/pt~p~ttt/~t~~/t~~~t~/l~/~ri/~ril~pt~~~~ wt~~~t~~ii/it~t~I//~ttt/~t~~/t~j~~t/~tt~t/~t/rt~~~/~~p/it~~~ ~0~/t~/~~~~/t~/~t~tt/~ttt/~t~~t~ttt/~~~/~~t~t~~~~~~/t~1/ ip~~it~l~tttl DELETED. ..." 2. Record CC & R's indicating the 100-year flood plain as a notice to future buyers, the 100-year flood plain to be determined by the Federal Insurance Rate Map that it is an environmental sensitive area with certain restrictions as shown on this plan (General Plan) dated December 14, 1982. 3. Provide all dedications and additional slope easements for Railroad Canuon Road and Frontage Road cul-de-sac as required by City Engineer. Railroad Canyon Road classified arterial highway with 110' right-of-way. 4. ~t~~t~~/~J~/~tt~~t/t~pt~~~~~~ti/t~t/~~t~t~~~/~~~t~~/~~~~ ~~~/rt~~t~~~/~~~~/~~~/~~/~~~/~i/t~~~tt~~/~t/~ttt/~~~t~~~tl DELETED. 5. ~t~~t~~/~/~~t~t~~~/$~t~/~~p~tt/~~~/~t~~t~~/~~~~/t~/~ttt ~~~t~~~tJ DELETED. 6. ~l~/~~~~M~/~t~p~~~~/~~~~~/~~/t~/t~~/1~t~/~t/~/~~~~t~~/t~~K ~~~t~t~t~t~~/~~~/~ppt~~~~/~t/t~~/~ttt/~t/~/Y/~JWJ~I DELETED. 7. Sign agreement with E.V.M.W.D. or the City to participate in new wastewater assessment district. ..." 8. M~~t/~~~/t~~~tt~~~~t~/~t/t~~/~~~~tt/,tt~/~~p~tt~~~t/t~t tlt~/~t~t~~t~J DELETED. 9. ~~~~~~t~/~~~t~~~~/~J~~ttt~~J/~t~~~/~~/t~~~tt~~/~t/$~~t~~t~ ~~~tt~t~t~/~~t~~~/~~~p~~tJ DELETED. 10. Meet all requirements of Ordinance 572. 11. t~it~J~~tt~~/~t/itt~~t/~t~~ti/~i/t~~~tt~~/~t/~ttt/~~~t~~~tJ DELETED. _ 12. Applicant to participate in Lighting and Landscaping and Street Assessment District for the three parcels. 13. ~~t/~~~~t~/$~t~tt/t~p~~t/~ttt~~tt~ri/t~~~/~i/~~t~t~t~~~/~t ~~~~J~tt~~/~~J/~)f~J DELETED. 14. A finding of conformance to the General Plan. 15. A finding of no significant impact. 16. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. ..." 17. Applicant to participate by agreement equitably in signalization to mitigate Traffic Safety Impact. 18. ~t~~t~~/~~t~t~~~/~~~~~~t~/~~~/$~t~~t~/$t~~t~iJ DELETED. 19. Applicant shall not place non-approved fill/materials within the lOO-year Flood Plain. Minutes of Planning Commission April 19, 1983 Page 5 ~ 3. Conditional Use Permit 83-4 - Tiffin Buck - Staff presented pro- posal for a Conditional Use Permit to establish a jet ski rental operation on the lake. Chairman opened the public hearing at 10:20 P.M. Asking for those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. Buck was present and requested clarification on condition number 8 and 9. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 10:23 P.M. Discussion was held on condition number 1 and 5 and applicant providing enclosed trash area. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Conditional Use Permit 83-4 with staff recommendations and amendments, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 1. Applicant shall obtain written permission to operate jet ski launching facilities from the Director of the Lake Elsinore State Recreation Area. This shall be presented to the Planning Department prior to issuance of a business license. 2. Applicant shall indicate on a site plan an area for adequate parking no closer than lPO feet to the existing lakeshore. 3. Applicant shall present proof of insurance prior to issuance of a business license. 4. Operations shall occur during State Park operating hours. ,\ ".-' ~ 5. Increases in the amount of jet skis used (if more than 6) in the operation shall receive approval from the Director of Community Development. 6. All signs shall be approved by the Planning Department. 7. Conditional Use Permit shall be valid for a period of one (1) year subject to a six-month review, and report to City Council. 8. A finding of conformity to the General Plan. 9. Issuance of a Categorical Exemption. 10. Applicant to provide enclosed trash area. ~ 4. Conditional Use Permit 83-5 and Commercial Project 83-2 - Wally McGowen - Staff presented proposal for a Conditional Use Permit and site approval to construct a coin operated carwash. Chairman opened the public hearing at 10:38 P.M. Asking for those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. McGowen was present and questioned condition number 3 and 5. Chairman asked if there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor. There being no one else present. wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 10:42 P.M. Discussion was held on condition number 3,5 and 1, internal turning radius, and ingress/egress. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Conditional Use Permit 83-5 and Commercial Project 83-2 with staff recommendations and the deletion of condi- tion number 5, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-1 Commissioner Washburn abstained from participating and voting due to conflict of interest. 1. Carwash bays are to be placed no closer than 35 feet to the front property line. 2. Dedicate 20 feet right-of-way for Riverside Drive and 5 feet right-of-way for st. Charles Place. Minutes of Planning Commission April 19, 1983 Page 6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-5 AND COMMERCIAL PROJECT 83-2 CONTINUED 3. Street, sewer, water and storm drain improvements to be constructed to the requirements of the City Engineer and applicable codes. 4. Meet City Engineer requirements for construction and maintenance of on-site sewage collection systems including grease traps and sand pits. ...., 5. ~PPXj~~~t/t~/~ji~/~it~~~~~t/t~/p~ttj~jp~t~/j~/r~~t/~~t~~t~/ ~ji~~Xjt~tj~~/pt~it~~J DELETED. 6. Riverside Drive access shall be designated for ingress only at a minimum of a 30 foot width. 7. Applicant to submit grading plan and soils report per City Engineer's requirements. 8. All Building and Capital Improvement fees required by Ordinance No. 572 and all Public Safety fees required by Resolution 83-4. 9. Meet requirements of County Fire Department. 10. A finding of conformance to the General Plan. 11. A finding of ,no significant impact upon- the environment. 12. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. 5. Zone Change 83-1 - Harmatz/Burkhart - Staff presented proposal for a zone change from R-l (Single-Family Residence) to M-l (Limited Manufacturing) for 16 acres northeast of the intersection of Chaney and Flint Streets. Chairman opened the public hearing at 11:00 P.M. Asking for those in favor of the project to speak. Mr. Terry Shook spoke in favor of the zone change requesting four additional condi- tions be added: 1) return both Flint and Silver Streets to the original locations; 2) the structures on the property should be removed; 3) Silver Street should be cleaned up; and 4) Asking the Planning Commission to direct staff to initiate a change in the Master Plan to include property between Mohr and Silver, Walnut and Flint in this ~ndustrial park. The Chairman informed Mr. Shook that the Commission could only address the zone change before them. Mr. Shook stated that if the other property could not be changed then he would recommend denial. Chairman asked is there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. Bill Burkhart was present and spoke in favor of the project. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. Mr. Shook ask that his opposition be noted. There being no more opposition the public hearing was closed at 11:12 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Zone Change 83-1 with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-1 Commissioner Washburn abstained from participating and voting due to conflict of interest. ...., ...., 1. Submittal of an accurate legal description for the property to be zone changed. 2. Adoption of Ordinance for zone change. 3. Proposed Zone Change will not prohibit the locality from providing required or necessary housing within the community. 4. A finding of conformity to the General Plan. 5. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. Minutes of Planning Commission April 19, 1983 Page 7 ZONE CHANGE 83-1 - HARMATZ/BURKHART CONTINUED 6. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. - BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Commercial Project 82-8 - Stan Levin - Staff presented proposal for site approval for an 800 square foot restaurant and ac- companying facilities on a 4.69 acre parcel adjacent to Lakeshore Drive east of Main Street. Mr. Levin was present and questioned condition number 11. Discussion was held on ingress/egress on Lakeshore Drive, off-site improvements, project being constructed in phases, and condition number 3 (placing utilities underground if possible). Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Com- mercial Project 82-8 with a change in condition number 3 that utilities be placed underground, if possible; deleting condition number 11; and adding condition number 20: that off-sites be in two stages from phase 1 taking in the westerly portion toward the east until you come to the center median, wherever it is located, and to include the other side, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-1 Chairman Steed abstained from participating and voting due to conflict of interest. 1. Dedicate to provide 50' half width right-of-way for. Lakeshore Drive based on Developers alignment study for Lakeshore Drive. - 2. Install Street Improvements as determ~ne~ by the City Engineer to include construction of curb, gutter, 8.' sidewalk and standard roadway section. The curb line shall be located 38' from the centerline based on Condition Number 1. 3. Relocate utilities which are in conflict with installation of off-site and on-site improvements placing underground if possible. 4. Construct adequate drainage facilities and provide any necessary storm drain easements. 5. Install standard Street Lighting. 6. All improvements to be designed by Developers Registered Civil Engineers. 7. Meet all requirements of Riverside County Fire Department for hydrant spacing. - 8. Developers Engineer to investigate the extension of City Sanitary Sewer to the site. If Sanitary Sewer cannot be made available then developer must meet the requirements of Riverside County Health Department for sub-surface sewage disposal. 9. Provide Grading Plan, Soils Report, Geological Study, Slope Stability Study, Hydrology Study. 10. Developer must provide adequate waterline sizes as determined by the City Engineer, both for on-site and off-site locations. 11. P~Y~f?P~1/~0~~~/~~1~J~J~~~~/J~/~/%Jg~~~'1~~'~~/~1~%1~~/J~~ ~~/~~~~t~j~~~Y/t~1/~~~/j~~~1%~~~j~~/~t/~~~~%~~t~/~1'1~/~~~ 0~j~/$tt~~~j DELETED. 12. Lakeshore Drive is classified as a Major Highway per City General Plan, therefore access to Lakeshore Drive should be limited to no more than three (3) driveways. Minutes of Planning Commission April 19, 1983 Page 8 COMMERCIAL PROJECT 82-8 - STAN LEVIN CONTINUED 13. Required parking for each phase shall be provided at time of occupancy. 14. Meet all requirements of Ordinance 572. , 15. Project shall be constructed in phases according to the -- approved plot plan. Any changes will require resubmittal to the Planning Commission. 16. Staff recordation of City Council CC & R's. 17. All Public Safety fees required by Resolution 83-4. 18. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 19. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. 20. That off-sites be in two stages from phase 1 taking in the westerly portion toward the east until you come to the center median, wherever it is located, and to include the other side. 2. Commercial 82-3 - Wally McGowen - See Conditional Use Permit 83-5 under public hearings. ) 3. Industrial Project 83-1 - HarmatzjBurkhart - Staff presented pro- posal for a 45,000 square foot manufacturing building and ac- companying facilities on 16 acres northeast of the intersection of Chaney and Flint Streets. Discussion was held regarding the existing structure on the property, and traffic congestion at the intersection of Chaney and Flint Streets. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Industrial Project 83-1 with staff recommenda- tions and amendments, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-1 Commissioner Washburn abstained from participating and voting due to conflict of interest. -- 1. Dedication along Flint Street not required. 2. Construct all street improvements as required by City Engineer per City Code and standard specifications. 3. Meet County of Riverside Fire Department requirements for hydrant spacing. 4. Install street lighting as directed by City Engineer. 5. Drainage shall be approved by the City Engineer and directed towards existing drainage channel (Temescal Wash) . 6. Applicant to meet the Riverside County Health Department's requirements for on-site sub-surface sewage disposal. 7. Applicant to furnish City Engineer with legal descriptions __ to correspond to Lot Line Adjustment 83-4. 8. Provide Grading Plan and Soils Report for proposed develop- ment. 9. Install waterline as directed by City Engineer. 10. Remove all existing structures on applicant's property except one (1) residence dwelling, providing said dwelling is brought to code. Minutes of Planning Commission April 19, 1983 Page 9 INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 83-1 - HARMATZ/BURKHART CONTINUED r--- 11. Provide parking access ways and associated facilities/ materials as indicated on plot plan. 12. Meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 572. 13. Staff recordation of CC & R's as required by City Council prior to plan checks. 14. All lighting shall be directed on-site. 15. Finding of no significant impact. 16. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. 17. Pay all Public Safety fees required by Resolution No. 83-4. 4. Lot Line Adjustment 83-1 - Harmatz/Burkhart - Staff presented pro- posal for a Lot Line Adjustment to re-arrange the lot lines of four parcels to create more useable lots. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Lot Line Adjustment 83-1 with staff recom- mendations, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-1 Commissioner Washburn abstained from participating and voting due to conflict of interest. - 1. Submittal of legal descriptions. for new._.parcels to be accepted as accurate by the City Engineer. 2. Issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT None PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Commissioner Saathoff - None Commissioner Dominguez - None Commissioner Washburn - None Commissioner Barnhart - None Chairman Steed - None -- Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 ~IINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 19TH. DAY OF APRIL 1983 ~UNUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve minutes as submitted, second by Commissioner Barnhart. .Z\pproved 5-0 BUSINESS ITEMS -- 1. Commercial Project 82-8 - Stan Levin - Staff presented proposal for design approval for six commercial buildings totaling 24,409 square feet on a 4.69 acre parcel adjacent to Lakeshore Drive east of Main Street. Mr. Stan Levin was present and questioned condition number 5, wanting clarification and also wanting to know why a bike lane on the north side of the lake instead of the lake side? Discussion was held on condition number 5 with Mr. Levin being informed that the bicycle lane would eventually be on both sides (north side and lake side), this will be accomplished as the area develops. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Commercial Project 82-8 with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-1 Chairman Steed abstained from participating and voting due to conflict of interest. 1. Applicant shall submit to the Design Review Board a land- scape plan detailing trees, shrubs, ground cover and other landscape features. 2. Building elevations shall be constructed as depicted on plans. Any-proposed changes will require resubmitt~l to the Design Review Board. 3. Signing plan for the commercial project shall be submitted __ to the Design Review Board for approval. 4. All roof mounted equipment, trash area, and ground support equipment shall be effectively screened from public view and subject to approval from the Planning Division. 5. Provide Class II bicycle lane for Lakeshore Drive. 6. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler systems. 7. All utility ~ervices shall be placed underground. 2. Commercial Project 83-2 - Wally McGowen - Staff presented proposal for site and design approval to construct a coin operated carwash at the northwest intersection of Riverside Drive and st. Charles Place. Commissioner Dominguez requested that the ten foot wide planter be changed to five foot. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to continue to a later time, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-1 Commissioner Washburn abstained from participating and voting due to conflict of interest. 3. Industrial Project 83-1 - Harmatz/Burkhart - Staff presented pro- posal for a 45,000 square foot manufacturing building and accompany- ing facilities. Chairman recommended this item be continued to a -- later time. 4. Single-Family Residence - 219 North Kellogg - Greenup - Staff pre- sented proposal for a single-family residence to be located at 219 North Kellogg. Proposal meets all ordinance requirements. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve as submitted, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 Minutes of Design Review Board April 19, 1983 Page 2 r-- 5. Single-Family Residence - 107 North Davis - Gennusa - Staff presented proposal for a single-family residence to be located at 107 North Davis. Proposal meets all ordinance requirements. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve as submitted, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 6. Single-Family Residence ~ 784 Acacia Street - Swalve - Staff presented proposal for a single-family residence to be located at 784 Acacia Street. The structure did not meet the setback requirements as originally presented for the R-l District. The applicant has modified the plan and is requesting that the side yard setback be five feet for the one-story side and six feet for the two-story side, which will enable the applicant to meet the setback requirements. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve plan as modified with side yard setback being five feet for the one-story side and six feet for the two-story side, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 - 3. Industrial Project 83-1 - Harmatz/Bur~hart - At this time the Commission continued the discussion on Industrial Project 83-1. Discussion was held on architectural design, landscape, roof mounted equipment being screened, enclosed trash area being provided. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve with staff recommendations and applicant providing enclosed trash area added as condition number 8, second q~.Commissioner Barnhart. t~__. ". Approved 4-1 Commissioner Washburn abstained from participating and voting due to conflict of interest. 1. Applicant shall submit a detailed landscape plan indicat- ing all plantings to the Design Review Board for approval. 2. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler systems. 3. All signs shall be approved by the Planning Division. 4. All utility services shall be placed underground. 5. All exterior materials and patterns identified on elevations shall be provided. If changed, Design Review Board approval is required. 6. All lighting shall be shielded so as not to shine onto adjacent streets or residences. 7. All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six inch high concrete curb. - 8. Applicant to provide enclosed trash area. 2. Commercial Project 83-2 - Wally McGowen - At this time the Commission continued the discussion on Commercial Project 83-2. Discussion was held on architectural design. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Commercial Project 83-2 with staff recommenda- tions, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 4-1 Commissioner Washburn abstained from participating and voting due to conflict of interest. 1. Project shall be constructed according to approved site plan and elevations. Any changes will require resubmittal to the Design Review Board. Minutes of Design Review Board April 19, 1983 Page 3 COMMERCIAL PROJECT 83-2 CONTINUED 2. Plan shall provide a five (5) foot wide planter adjacent to the front property line except for the driveway. 3. Provide a minimum of five (5) fifteen (15) gallon trees for front planters. Trees are to be approved by Planning Diyision. -- 4. Remainder of planting areas to utilize trees, shrubs, ground cover and grass subject to approval by the Planning Division. 5. All planting areas to utilize permanent and automatic sprinkler systems. 6. All planting areas are to be separated from paved areas with a six (6) inch high concrete curb. 7. All utility services shall be provided underground. There being no further business the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board adjourned at 12:23 A.M. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 i......... -- Approved Whit Steed Chairman Respectfully submitted, 1:::~ds~'d7 Planning Commission Secretary -- MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 3RD. DAY OF MAY 1983 THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7 :-34 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Chairman Steed. ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner Washburn and Chairman Steed. Commissioner Barnhart was absent. Also present was Intrim City Manager/Community Development Director, Robert Trevino and City Planner, Mike Norton. MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve minutes of April 19, 1983 as submitted, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Lakeshore Overlay District Ordinance - Chairman informed the audience that this item was a continuation of a public hearing and that the public hearing portion was closed at the last meet- ing, but the Commission would take input from citizens wishing to speak. The Chairman then gave a brief background report on the ordinance stating the changes that had been made. - Staff stated that this ordinance is to insure that the lake side is kept in a clean and orderly manner and briefly went through each section of the ordinance. Chairman asked is there was anyone present wishing to speak on the Lakeshore Overlay District Ordinance. Mr. Paul Baccus stated that this ordinance is to clean up Lake- shore Drive but there is nothing in the ordinance about clean up. Chairman stated that with this ordinance it will be possible to clean up the area and then post private property with the ordinance number and trespassers and litters could be cited. Mr. Baccus also questioned the building of restaurants and not being able to build a house in the overlay zone. Mr. Baccus was informe4 that a restaurant was an allowed use under certain conditions. -- Mr. Baccus also asked if property is a recreational zone it is zoned for camping and what is a private property owner to do when he is surrounded by specified property (camping area) and he can't camp on his property, and why should a private property owner have to have a conditional use permit? Chairman stated that camping was allowed in specified camping areas, and a private property owner would need a conditional use permit (which is renewable) because camping is not an allowed use outside of specified camping areas under existing ordinance. Being as there was no one else present wishing to speak on the Lake- shore Overlay Ordinance the Commission started discussion at the table. Commissioner Saathoff recommended that since the boundary has been changed to Country Club Heights that under Section 17.65.030 (F) Grazing for livestock but not pen feeding be deleted. Commissioner Washburn stated that for this area he concurred but for other areas it would be appropriate. Commissioner Saathoff also stated that there needs to be clarifica- tion as to certain existing uses and non-conforming uses. Minut~s of Planning Commission May 3, 1983 Page 2 Lakeshore Overlay District Ordinance Continued Commissioner Washburn recommended the following changes: The word maintenance added to the ordinance title, giving clarification that this is for keeping the area well maintained. - Expanding permitted uses. Removing Tourist Commercial Uses from Section 17.65.040 and inserting under Section 17.65.030. Section 17.65.030 (B) include ancillary uses. Commissioner Washburn recommended consideration for waiver of conditional use permit fees (non-transferable) for property owners within the Overlay Zone. Chairman Steed stated that maybe a time limit should be placed on it with a waiver of fees for the property owner. Commissioner Washburn stated that he did not believe a time limit was appropriate. Chairman Steed recommended Secti.on 17.65.030 (D) be changed to read: Fences parallel to Lakeshore Drive will be to the design of the Ramada State Park Area. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Lakeshore Overlay District Ordinance with stated changes, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 3-1 Commissioner Saathoff abstaining Commissioner. Washburn stated that he would like the following -- recommendation to be forwarded to the City Manager and Staff or be passed to the Committee for their action: Continuation of similar ordinances be implemented in on going phases around the perimeter of the lake. Also requesting County areas be included. BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Phasing from 2 to 3 for Tract 18211 - Doug Kulberg - Staff pre- sented request to change phasing plan for Tract 18211 from 2 to 3 phases for a residential subdivision of 21.47 acres into 91 single-family lots, southeast of the intersection of Lakeshore Drive and Terra Cotta Road. Discussion was held on street improvements. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Phasing from 2 to 3 ~hases for Tract 18211 with bonding for Lakeshore Drive improvements, as well as bonding for a connector to "E" Street, south to "D" Street, easterly on "D" Street to liB" Street, then south again on "B" Street to "A" Street, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT None -- PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Commissioner Washburn - The plate that covers the water meter in the sidewalk on Graham Street (between the Liquor Store and the Wreck) is missing and there is a drop of about 4 inches, this should be covered. Minutes of Planning Commission May 3, 1983 Page 3 Planning Commissioner's Report and Recommendation Continued , Commissioner Dominguez - None .---. Commissioner Saathoff - The building in front of Elsinore Village (it is a shed approximately 10 x 10 that houses mowers, rakes, hoes, etc.)was a permit issued or required for this structure? Chairman stated that a permit was not required for a structure 10 x 10 or smaller. Commissioner Saathoff stated he would not like to see this type of structure through out the city and something should be done that doesn't allow this type of building to be constructed in such a manner. Staff stated this will be looked into. Chairman Steed - None Commissioner Barnhart - absent Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 ~ ~ MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 3RD. DAY OF MAY 1983 MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve minutes as submitted, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 4-0 BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Free-standing sign - 1507 Lakeshore Drive - Louie Mitchell - At the direction of City Council staff is presenting to the Design Review Board sign application for a free-standing sign for a Palm Reading Business located at 1507 Lakeshore Drive. Staff stated the sign does not over power the surrounding area is well under the maximum allowed height and area. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve the free-standing sign, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 3-1 "Chairman Steed voting no - 2. Grading Plan - Mungia - Staff presented grading plan for Mungia requesting that this item be continued to the next meeting, so that the applicant can submit additional information required by the Engineering Department. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to continue Grading Plan for Mungia to the meeting of May 17, 1983, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 There being no further adjourned at 8:40 P.M. Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 business the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board Motion by Commissioner Dominguez, second by - Approved Whit Steed Chairman ZlY ;:r:;~ Linda Grindstaff ~ Planning Commission Secretary - MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 17TH DAY OF MAY 1983 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Barnhart. ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Dominguez, Com- missioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart and Chairman Steed. ..- Also present were City Planner Mike Norton and planner Dan Fissori. MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve minutes of May 3, 1983, as submitted, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 Chairman Steed said the first item of business was a public hear- ing and that, at this time, he would turn the meeting over to Com- missioner Dominguez and not participate as a Commissioner due to possible conflict of interest since he owns property within the area. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 1. Conditional Exception Permit 83-3 - Jan Hesselrod - Staff pre- sented proposal for a Conditional Exception Permit to vary from the requirements of the City's Parking Ordinance by deleting five (5) of the required ten (10) parking spaces. Commissioner Dominguez opened the public hearing at 7:32 p.m. and asked if anyone wished to speak in favor. There being no one present to speak in favor, Commissioner Dominguez then asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. CommiS.Siioner Steed, speaking as a private citizen and property owner at 113 South Main. Street, stated he was in opposition. There has been a similar business across the street which opened in the morning and it did clog the City parking lot. He further stated parking in the down- town area is a problem. This proposal desires to waive five (5) of their required parking spaces but he feels the City needs all the parking spaces they can get without waiving further spaces for a business coming in. There being no one else present wishing to speak in opposition, the City Planner read a letter of opposition received by the Planning Division today, May 17, from Messrs. Stan Smith and Paul Shay. At this time, 7:36 p.m., Commissioner Dominguez closed the public hear- ing. Commissioner Barnhart stated she concurred with staff's recomnlendation and feels that most of applicant's business will be after streets are pretty well empti~d from the business of the day. There is a public lot across the street that is full during the day but in the evening is pretty well open so doesn't see any problem with the parking. Commissioner Barnhart asked the applicant, Jan Hesselrode, who was in the audience, if she cared to comment on any of the staff's recommended conditions of approval. Jan Hesselrode, 33263 Fairview, Lake Elsiore, stated she had called the City Planner today after receiving her copy of the conditions in the afternoon mail. She ques- tioned Condition *4 regarding a 6-month review of her Condi- tional Exception Permit and Condition *3 requiring paving of rear parking lot. Commissioner Dominguez told her. Condition *4 was a condition given to all Conditional Use Permits and that it was at the discretion of the Commission as to whether to require conditions. Commissioner Washburn said Mr. Stan Smith had called him today and stated his concerns as outlined in his letter. Commissioner Washburn said his concern would be the rear parking off of a narrow alley which enters the site in a high density area and he is not in favor of this request for a variance. Commissioner Saathoff asked staff how they could get five (5) parking spaces out of a 25 foot lot. The City planner stated after the tin building is removed in the rear, the site could contain five (5) ,diagonal parking spaces. Commissioner Saathoff ask~d if the standard parking - Minutes of Planning Commission May 17, 1983 Page 2 space is 9' x 18', depending on the angle, and was answered in the affirmative by staff. He then stated he didn't feel the area would be large enough for the five .(5) spaces - they would be cramped and very close. He said he feels a 50% dele- tion of parking requirements is too high a percentage and questioned the feasibility of the area being adequate for five (5) parking spaces. Commissioner Dominguez didn't object so much to the parking as to the hours of operation - from 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to deny Conditional Exception Permit 83-3, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 3-1, Commissioner Barnhart voting "no" and Chairman Steed abstaining. - BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Lot Line Adjustment 83-6 - Butterfield Surveys, Inc. - Staff presented proposal for a Lot Line Adjustment to create a lot more suitable for residential development. Motion by Commis- sioner Washburn to approve Lot Line Adjustment 83-6 with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 1. City Engineer verification of legal description as accurate. 2. Issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. I ,",,,,,-,,,,",-..' 2. Residential Project 83-1 - Winchester Associates - Staff pre- sented proposal for site and development plans for a multiple 4-plex unit development adjacent to Nashland Avenue on lots __ which vary in size from a minimum of 6,290 to 9,035 square feet. The applicant, Mark La Porte, 3860 Ulla Lane, Lake Elsinore, stated he had no problems with the conditions recommended by staff. At this time, Commissioner Washburn withdrew from the table and participation in this matter due to possible conflict of interest. Commissioner Saathoff questioned Condition #2 - Seal all the existing asphalt paved street - and asked if it was something new. The City Engineer said it is a dedicated and improved street that has never been used before and to save the asphalt the developer is being asked, instead of having to remove and replace at a later date, that once construction is completed, to seal the street. This is-a request normally asked of and performed by a developer. Mr. La Porte said he had no problem with this condition and had an understanding with staff. Commissioner Saathoff questioned Condition #6 and was informed by the City Engineer that it is a defunct fire hydrant that should be removed and that a new fire hydrant is adjacent at the intersection. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Residential Project 83-1 with staff recommendations, second b~ Commissioner Barnhart.' Approved 4-0, Commissioner Washburn abstaining. 1. Improve.drainage outlet onto Riverside Drive. 2. Seal all the existing asphalt paved street. -- 3. Provide improved drainage at the end of cul-de-sac as directed by City Engineer. 4. Raise clean out to grade. 5. Provide delineation on guard rail on end of Quail Street. 6. Remove existing fire hydrant.at Tract boundary. 7. All lots to drain to street. - - - Minutes of Planning Commission May 17, 1983 Page 3 3. Commercial Project 83-3 - Mounzer Chaarani - Staff presented proposal for site approval for a 58,000 to 66,000 square foot combination retail/office commercial center, northwest of the corner of Lincoln Street and Riverside Drive. Applicant has submitted three (3) different renderings - "A," the original rendering submitted in mid-April and "B" and "c" renderings submitted on April 27, 1983. Mr. Daniel Possnak of Chaar ani & Associates, was in the audience and presented himself to clarify any questions the Commission might have. Discussion ensued between the Commissioners and Mr. Possnak regarding ingress and egress on Riverside Drive. Commissioner Dominguez asked Mr. Possnak if he had received the staff recommendations and was answered in the negative. Commissioner Washburn recom- mended Mr. Possnak be given a copy of the recommendations and 15 to 20 minutes to read and study them. Chairman Steed moved and it was unanimously approved they give applicant's repre- sentative an opportunity to study the staff recommendations while the Commission proceeded to the next Business Item, after which they would return to consider Commercial Project 83-3. 4. Redevelopment plan - Redevelopment Project II (Resolution) - Robb Steel, Senior Administrative Assistant gave a short expla- nation regarding the necessity for the Planning Commission's review, report and recommendation concerning the Redevelopment Plan and its conformity to the General Plan. Chairman Steed stated he would like this matter continued to the next meeting. Since they received these two lengthy reports late Friday, May 13, there hadn't been time to read through them completely. Motion by Chairman Steed to continue Redevelopment Plan-Redevel- opment Project II (Resolution) to the Planning Commission meet- ing on June 7, 1983, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 3. Commercial Project 83-3 - Mounzer Chaarani - At this time, the Commission continued the discussion on Commercial Project 83-3. Mr. Daniel Possnak, 15664 palomino Drive, Chino, r~presenting Mr. Chaarani, stated they expected to resolve the question of the three (3) different proposals very soon after a small amount of market research of some type. Chairman Steed asked Mr. Possnak if there were any questions regarding the staff recom- mendations. Mr. Possnak answered by going down the list of conditions and commented that #1 would be no problem, questioned #2 and the specified size of sidewalk and was informed that in order to have a 5' sidewalk after fire hydrants, light standards, etc., are installed, an 8' sidewalk was required. Conditions #3 through #10 he found no problems with. He questioned Con- dition #11 and asked what it would consist of. After discus- sion, Condition #11 was changed by adding "applicant to pay fair share of cost." Mr. possnak was agreeable with Conditions #12 through #19. Commissioner Washburn asked for a definition of CC & R's. Planner Dan Fissori explained that a CC & R is an agreement signed by applicant binding the conditions of approval to the land. Discussion then ensued on the three (3) renderings. Mr. possnak was asked which rendering he preferred and he stated "C." Considerable discussion then transpired on ingress and egress on Riverside Drive and Lincoln Streets, as well as the architectural design of the building. Jim Hand with the Lincoln Center commented on the importance of maintaining a green area in this project. Janice Berraire, who lives behind this project, questioned height of building (for her privacy needs) and was told the building will be from 20 to 60 feet from her fence. Michael Berraire asked regarding time of activities of construc- tion, deliveries, etc., and was informed the Commission had no control over those concerns, but, if there is a noise hazard, the Code Enforcement Officer would look into the matter. Motion Minutes of Planning Commission May 17, 1983 Page 4 Commercial Project 83-3: Mounzer Chaarani - Continued by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Commercial Project 83-3 with staff recommendations and adding to Condition #11 the words "pay fair share of cost," second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 .... 1. Provide connection to City sewer as approved by City Engineer. 2. Construct commercial sidewalk 8' along Riverside Drive and Lincoln Street. 3. Construct commercial driveways on Riverside Drive, minimum 30' in width per City Standards. 4. Construct commercial driveways on Lincoln Street per City Standards, minimum 20'. 5. Meet Water District and County Fire Department requirements for domestic and fire services. 6. Applicant to participate equitably in cost of future traffic signalization at Lincoln Street and Riverside Drive. 7. Applicant to complete street improvements at the intersec- tion of Lincoln Street and Riverside Drive as directed by the City Engineer. 8. Install street lights per City Engineer's requirements. '-' 9. Dedicate water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore. 10. Agree to participate in a Lighting and Landscaping Assess- ment District. 11. Because of increased storm water run-off which will be generated, applicant to pay fair share of cost to improve drainage facility along Riverside Drive to Leach Canyon Channel as required by the City Engineer or pay a drainage assessment fee. 12. All on-site utilities to be underground. 13. Satisfy the City Engineer that street dedications have been completed. 14. All items depicted on plot plan/landscape plan and eleva- tions shall be provided as indicated on the plot plan, unless otherwise modified by the Planning Commission/Design Review Board's conditions. 15. Recordation of City Council CC & R's prior to transfer of plans to the City's Building Department. 16. Pay all applicable Capital Improvement and Public Safety fees. .... 17. Striping for a Class II bicycle lane. 18. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 19. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. Minutes of Planning Commission May 17, 1983 Page 5 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT - None PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Commissioner Barnhart - None. Commissioner Washburn - Wants to impress the staff with the impor- tance of applicants receiving staff recommendations well in advance of the meeting, at least one day before the meeting. If there is a time crunch, the City could use the overnight delivery system. Also he would like the Commissioners to receive in their packets, to round out information on projects, copies of the comments sent back from the various agencies such as Fire Department, Water Board, Health Department, Sheriff's Department, etc. They used to receive them some time ago but haven't lately. Commissioner Dominguez - Asked that a follow-up be made after noti- fication to applicants on staff recommendations and also make sure there is an explanation of what staff requires on the forms that go out to the agencies such as, Fire Department, Water Board, Health Department, etc. Commissioner Saathoff - None. - ,j MO.tion by Commissioner Washburn to adJourtr-to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 ....--, MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 17TH DAY OF MAY 1983 MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve minutes of May 3, 1983 as submitted, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 BUSINESS ITEMS 1. ...., Commercial Project 83-3 - Mounzer Chaarani - Staff presented proposa~ for arc~itectural design an~ landscape approval for commerc1al shopp1ng center on a 4.73- acre parcel on the north- west corner of Lincoln Street and Riverside Drive. Mr. Daniel Possnak, representing Mr. Chaarani, was asked if he had a copy of staff recommendations and upon his negative reply, he was given a copy and, after reading same, said he saw no problem with the conditions. Discussion was held on the architectural design and the feeling was that the design was too plain and sterile. The Commissioners felt the middle stores could be receded back from the major building anchors at each end to break the contrast of a stark, long corridor walkway - a less square appearance. Certain areas could be opened up more, 4' x 4' poles could be used with ivy covering them, open- beamed ceilings, etc., could really enhance the overall appear- ance. Discussion was also held on signage with Condition #6 added to read, "All internal retail shop signage to be of simi- lar size and design." Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Commercial Project 83-3 with staff recommendations #2, #3, #4, #5 and the added Condition #6 and to approve conceptually Con- dition #1 which is amended to read, "Final landscape and archi- tectural design plans to be submitted and approved in accordance with the desires of the Design Review Board," second Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 ...., 1. Final landscape and architectural design plans to be sub- mitted and approved in accordance with the desires of the Design Review Board. 2. All trash areas, and storage shall be screened and approved by the Planning Division. 3. Applicant shall provide lighting plan in conjunction with landscape plan to be reviewed in accordance with Design Review Board practice. 4. All signs shall be approved by the Planning Division. 5. All roof mounted or ground support equipment incidental to the development shall be architecturally screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. 6. All internal retail shop signage shall be of similar size and design. 2. Residential Project 83-1 - Winchester Associates - Commissioner Washburn excused himself from participating on this matter due __ to a possible conflict of interest. Staff presented proposal for design approval of multiple family units adjacent to Nash- land Avenue and requested that "screened trash areas" be added as Condition #3 to the staff conditions of approval. Discussion was then held on the latest design drawings submitted. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve design concept of Residen- tial Project 83-1 with staff recommendations and "screened trash areas" added as Condition #3, second Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0, Commissioner Washburn abstaining. Minutes of Design Review Board May 17, 1983 Page 2 ----- 1. All items depicted on plot plan/landscape plan and eleva- tions shall be provided as indicated unless otherwise modified by the Board's conditions. 2. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system. 3. Screen trash areas. 3. Grading Plan - Mungia - Staff presented background on this grad- ing plan submittal. Since the additional information from the applicant required by the Engineering Department has not been received, staff requested this matter be continued to the next meeting. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to continue Grading Plan for Mungia to the meeting of June 7, 1983, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 There being no further business, the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 i ~--~. ~ Approved Whit Steed Respectfully submitted, Ruth Edwards Planning Commission Secretary ..... - - MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 7TH. JUNE 1983 DAY OF THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:30 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Community Development Director Robert Trevino. ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Dominguez, Com- missioner Barnhart and Chairman Steed. Commissioner Washburn was absent. Also present were Community Development Director Robert Trevino, City Planner Mike Norton, and Planner Dan Fissori. MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve minutes of May 17, 1983 as submitted, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 Commissioner Washburn arrived at 7:34 P.M. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Tentative Tract Map 19357 and Conditional Exception Permit 83-5 _ Art Nelson - Staff presented proposal for a subdivision of 7.6 acres (north of Riverside Drive, west of Joy Street) into 65 lots and a Conditional Exception Permit to allow a minimum lot size of 3,350 square feet and zero side yard setbacks. Staff had originally requested a continuance on this item, but after meeting with the developer and engineer and discussing concerns and time constraints on this project, staff would like to change its recommendation to approval subject to 32 conditions. Mr. Fred Crowe, representing the applicant, requested a few minutes to review the conditions of approval. Chairman stated that Mr. Crowe could have the time to review the conditions and the Commission would take his input later. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:37 P.M. Asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. Art Nelson was present and stated he was in favor of the project and would answer any questions the Commission may have on this project. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:39 P.M. Chairman asked for discussion at the table. Commissioners Dominguez, Washburn, and Barnhart asked to have discussion after Mr. Crowe has reviewed the conditions. Chairman Steed stated that in condition number 6 the word "from" should be changed to "at", and questioned condition number 26 stating he was not aware that this was a policy of the city. Mr. Fred Crowe, representing the applicant, questioned condi- tions number 2 and 26. Discussion was held on condition number 2, adding the words "or variance as necessary", condition number 5(c), condition number 6, changing the word "from" to "at", condition number II, adding the words "within tract", condition number 24, deleting the words "and Street Maintenance", condition number 26, beinq deleted, and condition number 29, adding the words "'block wall at knuckle on the intersection of Joy and Quail Drive'!. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Tentative Tract Map 19357 and Conditional Exception Permit 83-5 with staff recommendations and amendments. City Engineer requested that he be allowed to explain condition number 18 to the Commission and applicant. Chairman stated there was a motion on the table and his request could not be granted at this time. Commissioner Barnhart's motion was seconded by Commissioner Dominguez with the stipulation that the City Engineer be allowed to clarify condition number 18 to the Commission and applicant before final approval. City Engineer stated that the applicant's equitable share of cost to upgrade existing Joy Street storm drain facility would be approximately $60,000.00. Discussion was held on condition number 18. Commissioner Barnhart moved for Minutes of Planning Commission June 7, 1983 Page 2 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 19357 AND CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION PERMIT 83-5 CONTINUED approval of Tentative Tract Map 19357 and Conditional Exception Permit 83-5 with the modification of her previous motion to include condition number 18 regarding the storm drain facilities equitable share shall be negotiated with staff, second by Com- missioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 __ 1. A finding that a General Plan Amendment is not needed for the placement of Quail Drive. 2. Applicant shall obtain a zone change or variance as necessary for subdivision. 3. Applicant shall submit a plot plan to the Planning Com- mission and City Council showing placement of structures on the lots, parking, and landscaping. 4. stagger front yard setbacks along each street with 1/3 being 18 feet, 1/3 being 20 feet, and 1/3 being 22 feet. 5. Developer to record appropriate CC & R's for: a) Assuring uniform maintenance of appearance of all structures. b) Maintenance of all front yard landscaping. c} Mediating disputes between property owners. 6. In the rear yard of common wall lot lines, construct a solid decorative masonary wall six feet in height at the rear yard property line. -- 7. Dedicate water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore. 8. Dedicate 60' right-of-way for all public streets. 9. Construct street improvements per County Standard Plan as required by City Engineer. 10. Complete street Improvements for Joy Street as requried by City Engineer adjacent to tract to include pavement transitions. 11. Construct 8" Sewer Main within tract. 12. Construct house lateral per County Standard #600 with c1eanout at property line per County Standard #603. 13. Construct access ramps per County Standard #402. 14. Construct driveways per County Standard #207. 15. Provide preliminary soils report. -- 16. Provide grading plans. 17. Applicant to provide Hydrology and Hydraulic Studies for subject areas. Minutes of Planning Commission June 7, 1983 Page 3 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 19357 AND CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION PERMIT 83-5 CONTINUED 18. Applicant's equitable share of cost to upgrade existing aoy street storm drain facility to be negotiated with staff. 19. Applicant to meet all requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 20. Applicant to pay all applicable Plan Check and Inspection Fees. 2l. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. - 27. 28. 29. Install street lights per County Standard #1000 as required by City Engineer. Applicant to obtain water service availability letter from Elsinore Water District. Applicant to meet requirements of Riverside County Fire Department. Applicant to form Landscape and Lighting District. Applicant to participate equitability in Traffic Signaliza- tion at the intersection of Joy Street and Riverside Drive. ~~~~tt~~t/~~~~~/~~t~~~t~~/~/~~~~/~~t~t~~~~~~/~t~ttt~t/~~ ~~~t~y~~/~t/t~~/~ttt/~~wt~~~tJ DELETED. Execute an agreement with the Elsinore School District and pay developer fees as required. Bond for sprinkler irrigation system. Provide block wall as required by City Council at knuckle on the intersection of Joy Street and Quail Drive. 30.. A finding of conformance to the General Plan. 31. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 32. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Lot Line Adjustment 83-5 - El Toro Investors - Staff presented proposal for a Lot Line Adjustment requesting the re-alignment of one property line currently parallel to El Toro Road. Motion by Commi.ssioner Dominguez to approve Lot Line Adjustment 83-5 with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 --- 1. City Engineer acceptance of all documents as accurate. 2. Issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. 2. Commercial Addition - Peddler's Village - Staff presented proposal for a commercial addition (30' x 70' addition) on an existing build- ing. Due to City Engineer requirements for dedication and improve- ments, staff recommends this item be continued to a future date. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to continue Commercial Addition for Peddler's Village to a future date (this date to be set by staff), second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 Minutes of Planning Commission June 7, 1983 Page 4 BUSINESS ITEMS CONTINUED 4. Redevelopment Plan - Redevelopment Project II (Resolution) _ Robb Steel, Senior Administrative Assistant, gave a brief background report on the Rancho Laguna Redevelopment Project II (Resolution). Mr. Steel recommended the Planning Commission adopt Resolution with a finding that the Redevelopment Plan for Rancho Laguna Redevelopment Project II conforms to the General Plan and transmitting the Commission's report and recommendation to the Redevelopment Agency. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to adopt Resolution as presented and forward to Redevelopment Agency, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 -- COMMUNITY DEVLEOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT None PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Commissioner Saathoff - None Commissioner Dominguez - Would like to see that property owners or businesses on streets with an alley start depositing their trash out in the alley instead on the front of the street. There is a new doctor's office on Lakeshore Drive and they have been piling their trash out in front, they have an alley and I think they should deposit all of their trash in the alley. Commissioner Washburn - The City needs to put together a brief synopsi~ on fiscal responsibilities (what the fiscal responsibilities of __ the project might be, what the city's responsibility is to the public, and what he mayor may not have to pay on proposed developments) . Something that will give guidelines to developers or users who come in to the valley. Also, I think it might be appropriate to set up or establish a pre-planning councilor group to sit with developers with staff on board prior to processing projects. Commissioner Barnhart - None Chairman Steed - Noticed that down at Jan & Judy's (The Embers) there are no bumpers along Riverside Drive to control ingress/egress, and capital improvements and landscaping have not been done. This also exists at Kay's Barn. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 .... MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 7TH. DAY OF JUNE 1983 MINUTE ACTION -- Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve minutes of May 17, 1983 as submitted, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Commercial 83-4 - Elsinore Ecology Center - Staff presented pro- posal for site approval for a 1,600 square foot sales room to be built on an existing auto dismantling yard, adjacent to Collier Avenue. Mr. Guy Taylor, applicant, was present and questioned conditions 1 through 12. Discussion was held on condition number 2, deleting second sentence, "Applicant's engineer shall prepare, under City direction, a precise plan of alignment for Collier Avenue and obtain necessary information from the Railroad on the location of their right-of-way", and adding the words "when proper road alignment is established", condition number 3 being deleted, condition number 7, deleting the words "with grass and one (1) fifteen (15) gallon tree every twenty (20) feet", condition number 9 being deleted, condition number 10 being deleted, and condition number 12 deleting the words "and Health Department" and adding the words "by providing sanitary facility when sewer line is available to the property. In the meantime, applicant shall provide additional chemical sanitary facility". Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve C 83-4 with staff recommendations and amendments, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 -.. 3. 4. 5. 6. - 7. 8. 1. Applicant to submit plot plan of the property and its use and legal description of entire property per City Council conditions of approval for permanent status of Conditional Use Permit at the December 28, 1982 Council meeting. 2. Meet City Engineer requirements for dedication and construction of improvements on Collier Avenue for a 66 foot wide modified collector street when proper road alignment is established. ~~~t/~ttl/~~~t~~~t/t~~~tt~~~nt~/t~t/~t~t~~~~/t~~tt~~1 DELETED. Pay all applicable Capital Improvement and Public Safety fees. Provide the City with a "hold harmless: agreement. Provide a minimum of six (6) paved parking spaces according to the provisions of Chapter 17.66. Planter beds shall be renovated and planted. All operations shall be conducted within the fenced yard, except for parking. All items on the approved plot plan shall be constructed as depicted. Any changes will necessitate resubmittal. 9. ~~~t~~~t/t~/~~~t~~t~/~~t~t/tt~~t~/t~/t~~/~ttt/~t/~~~~/ ~~~t~~t~1 DELETED. Minutes of Design Review Board June 7, 1983 Page 2 COMMERCIAL 83-4 - ELSINORE ECOLOGY CENTER CONTINUED 10. ~pp~t~-~~/~~/t~~/~~~~~~~pt~gl/$~t~~~/~tg~~t~g/~~~ $tt~~t/~_tnt~~_~~~/~t~ttt~tl DELETED. 11. Applicant to provide City with water service avail- ability letter from water district. - 12. Applicant shall comply with Section 705 of the 1979 Uniform Building Code (Restrooms) by providing sanitary facility when sewer line is available to the property. In the meantime, applicant shall provide additional chemical sanitary facility. 2. Plot Plan for Conditional Use Permit 82-13 - David and Chris Blood - Staff presented plot plan for Conditional Use Permit 82-13 complying with condition number 1. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve plot plan with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 1. Stable business shall be layed out according to the approved plot plan. 2. Trash bin shall be enclosed on three sides by screening. 3. Single-Family Residences (3) - 15810 Grand Avenue - Hugh Mosbacher Staff presented request for a continuance on this item to the meeting' of June 21, 1983., so that staff and the applicant can . meet and discuss various concerns on the project. Motion by Com- missioner Washburn to continue Single-Family Residence to the meeting of June 21, 1983, motion died for lack of second. Mr. Mosbacher was present and stated that he was informed that this project would be on the agenda and that the Board would be taking action on the matter. Chairman:stated the Board could review the designs and any other legal ramifications would be handled back through. staff or the Commission. Mr. Mosbacher presented a brief report on his project. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Single-Family Residence design as presented, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 ...., 4. Commercial Addition - Peddler's Village -Motion by Commissioner Washburn to continue Commercial Addition-to a future date (this date to be set by staff), second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0. Grading Plan - Mungia - Staff presented background report on the grading plan for Mungia, stating that this item was before the Board on May 3 and May 17, 1983 and continued to the meeting of June 7, so that additional information could be submitted. The Engineering Department has multiple concerns with the plan as submitted. Staff is recommending approval of grading plan subjec~ to eight conditions. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve grading plan with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 5. 1. Grading Plan must conform to UBC Chapter 70 and Ordinance No. 636. Minutes of Design Review Board June 7, 1983 Page 3 GRADING PLAN - MUNGIA CONTINUED 2. Applicant to prepare street improvement plans for Ryan Avenue and Barkschat Drive. -- 3. Applicant to submit Hydrology and Hydraulic studies to identify any potential impacts of adjacent and downstream properties. 4. All retaining walls in excess of 2-1/2' in height must have protection barrier fencing per Section 15.64.070 item (E). 5. Applicant to furnish necessary clearance from applicable agencies for septic systems. 6. Applicant to furnish Title Report for subject property to City Engineer. 7. Applicant to meet all required building set backs. 8. Driveway access shall conform to Ordinance No. 636 Section 15.64.080. -- There being no further adjourned at 9:05 P.M. Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 business, the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board Motion by Commissioner Barnhart, second by Approved Whit Steed Chairman Respectfully submitted, Li1:::::t~ Planning Commission Secretary -- - - - MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 21ST. DAY OF JUNE 1983 THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Dominguez, Com- missioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart and Chairman Steed. Also present were Community Development Director Robert Trevino, City Planner Mike Norton, and Planner Dan Fissori. MINUTE ACTION Commissioner Washburn stated that on page four under Planning Com- missioner's Report and Recommendation, that his recommendation was that the city put together a brief synopsis on fiscal responsibilities not physical responsibilities, and that his name be added under roll call. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve minutes of June 7, 1983 as corrected, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Conditional Use Permit 83-6 and Conditional Exception Permit 83-4 - Robert Parker - Staff presented proposal for a Conditional Use Permit to establish a bicycle motocross track and a Conditional Exception Permit to waive paving within the parking area. Staff stated that on cO'ndition number 7, the City Engineer requested that this condition be modified to "Dedicate 20 feet of right-of- way along Mission Trail and 10 feet of right-of-way along Casino Drive". Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:37 P.M. Asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. Frank DePasquale spoke in favor of the project. Mr. Vincent Dublino spoke in favor of the project. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. Ms. Linda Barcelona, representing Stater Brothers Markets and T & S Development read letters stating op- position on the project. There being no one else present wishing to speak in opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:46 P.M. Discussion was held on type of bleachers to be used, Planning Commission knowing the type of decorative fencing and landscaping to be installed, County Health Department approval on the snack bar, hours of operation, condition number 2 changing "one (1) year review" to "six month reviews", condition number 6 adding the word "track", condition number 7 being deleted, and condition number 10 changing the word "with" to "without". Motion by Com- missioner Washburn to approve Conditional Use Permit 83-6 and Conditional Exception Permit 83-4 with staff recommendations and amendments, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Commissioner Saathoff requested permission to make a comment on items 8, 9, and 10 to include in the motion that the criteria for those paragraphs be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval, asking that this be made an addendum to the motion. Chairman recommended that this be done at Planning Commissioner's Report and Recommendation to staff. Commissioner Washburn amended his motion by adding condi- tion number 11, which will read: The Planning Commissioner's Report and Recommendation be included in the staff recommendation when submitted to City Council, highlighted to outline the criteria dealing with item number 8, 9, and 10, pursuant to staff recommenda- tion, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 1. On si,te improvements conform to plot plan submitted. 2. Appli.cant s.hall be subject to six (6) month reviews and a maximum two t2} year stay. 3. Over night camping shall be prohibited. Minutes of Planning Commission June 21, 1983 Page 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-6 AND CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION PERMIT 83-4 CONTINUED 4. Snack bar facility shall be temporary in nature. 5. Parking areas shall be treated with not less than one- half gallon per square yard of penetration coat oil followed within six months thereafter of one-fourth gallon per square yard of seal cost oil placed on a base of decomposed granite or equal, compacted to a maximum thickness of three (3) inches. ...." 6. Water non-oil treated track areas to be completed before each day's event. 7. ~~~t~~t~/~~/t~~t/~t/t~~~tf~tf~~t/~l~~~/~~~~~~~/1t~~l ~~~/~~/t~~t/~t/t~~~tf~tf~~l/~~~~~/~~~~~~/~t~Y~J DELETED. 8. Applicant to 'construct pavement transitions along Mission Trail at designated ingress/egress locations as directed by the City Engineer. 9.. Applicant to construct two (2) thirty (30) foot wide temporary A.C. driveways and provide lighting at drive- ways as directed by City Engineer. 10. Clean drainage culvert crossing of Mission Trail and grade and improve across frontage of property to direct drainage into culvert without excess errosion. Repair existing pavement across frontage of property as required by the City Engineer. I ....- 11. The Planning Commissioner's Report and Recommendation be included in the staff recommendation when submitted to City Council, highlighted to outline the criteria dealing with item number 8,9, and 10, pursuant to staff recommendation. 2. Zone Change 83-2 - A.A. Attridge Commissioner Washburn stated that he had a personal interest in this matter and requested to be excused. Staff presented proposal for a zone change from R-2 (TwO-Family Residence) to M-2 (Industrial District) for two (2) parcels (combined area 27,000 square feet) approximately 150 feet north and west of the intersection of Pottery and Riley Street. Chairman stated that he believes (if this were researched) that it was the recommendation of the Commission that this would be M-l property at the time they did the General Plan. Chairman 'opened the public hearing at 8:15 P.M. Asking for those pres,ent wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. A.A. At.;. , tridge was present and spoke in favor of the project. There being : no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then i asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public-J hearing was closed at 8:20 P.M. Discussion was held on applicant being able to store his personal equipment on his own property without a zone change. Motion by Chairman Steed to deny Zone Change 83-2 without prejudice with the stipulation that the Plan- nLqg Commission initiate a study to determine subject area's highest and best use when the new Zoning Ordinance is adopted and that the fees be returned to the applicant. Approved 4-0 - Commissioner Washburn abstained. Minutes of Planning Commission June 21, 1983 Page 3 BUSINESS ITEM - 1. Lot Line Adjustment 83-7 - Howard Palmer - Staff presented pro-. posal for a Lot Line Adjustment requesting to realign the existing property line in order to have two (21 new triangular shaped lots. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Lot Line Adjustment 83-7 with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 1. City Engineer acceptance of all documents as accurate. 2. Issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR I. S REPORT Community Development Director Trevino, stated that he had no report, but will address some of the concerns that th.e Planning Commission had at the prior meeting and will have a report for the Commission on those concerns at the next meeting. PLANNINGCOMMIS'STONER1S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - Commissioner Saathoff - Would like to reiterat~ on the comment made earlier that when a criteria is to be established by some member of City Staff that it be spelled out for the Planning Commission, and the reason being is so that we know what is going to be required, we are aware that the applicant knows what is going to be required and I thinR it might eliminate a lot of problems and questions. Commissioner Dominguez - Lakeshore Drive at the end of Graham - from that point to Main Street with all the traffic we are getting on Lakeshore Drive, I would like to have the traffic engineer take a survey (on the hazards, impact and what can be done), and anyone else that would like to look at the situation and have some input at the next meeting. Commissioner Washburn - None Commissioner Barnhart - It is so nice to be able to make a right hand turn from Lakeshore Drive at Four Corners onto Riverside Drive, they finally got rid of all the pot holes and its nicely paved, thank you. Chairman Steed - None Motion by Commissioner Washburn to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approv~d 5-0 - MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 21ST. DAY OF JUNE 1983 MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve minutes of June 7, 1983, as submitted, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 BUSINESS ITEMS ...., The Chairman asked the Commissioners if they had reviewed the eleva- tions for Tract Map 19357 and Tract Map 15382, and if they would like to take these in total. The Commission stated yes they had reviewed the elevations for the Tract Maps and would like to take these in total. 1. & 2. Elevations for Tract 19357 and Tract 15382 - Art Nelson - Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve elevations for Tract 19357 and Tract 15382 as presented, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 3. Single-Family Residence & Grading - Gunnerson Street - Bowen - Staff presented proposal for a single-family residence and grading plan for Bowen to locate a single-family residence on Gunnerson Street. The plan meets all zoning requirements. The City Engineer stated that on the grading plan there is a problem with drainage. Discussion was held on drainage, and percolation. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Single-Family Residence with Grading Plan subject to City Engineer's approval, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 4. Single-Family Residence & Grading - 109 Townsend - Harbin - Staff ...., presented proposal to locate a single-family residence at 109 Townsend. The plan meets all zoning requirements. Motion by Com- missioner Dominguez to approve Single-Family Residence and Grading as presented, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 5. Commercial Addition and Parking Lot - General Telephone - Staff presented proposal for a commercial addition to the existing utility office and a 20 space parking lot to be 10cated at the corner of Graham Avenue and Langstaff Street. Discussion was held on improving the alley. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve commercial addition and parking lot with staff recommendations and adding condition number 3 which will read: Applicant shall improve their half of alley with concrete gutter down the side. Adding condition number 4 which will read: Applicant to provide security lighting for parking lot. Second by Oornmiss1oner Barnhart, Approved 5-0 1. Meet all requirements of City Engineer for grading, drainage, dedication and improvements. 2. Proposal shall be built according to presented plot plan. Any changes will necessitate resubmittal. 3. Applicant shall improve their full half of alley with paving and concrete gutter down the side. ...., 4. Applicant to provide security lighting for parking lot. Minutes of Design Review Board June 21, 1983 Page 2 There being no further business, the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board adjourned at 9:00 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart., second by ~ Commissioner Washburn. . Approved 5-0 Approved Whit Steed Chairman Respectfully submitted, ~ A-:-4#'? Linda Grindstaff Planning Commission Secretary r-- Minutes of Planning Commission July 5, 1983 Page 2 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 17413-3 AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 83-1 CONTINUED number 57 which will read: Class II bicycle lane to be pro- vided along "A" Street (which will be named Canyon Lake Hills Boulevard). Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Tentative Tract Map 17413-3 and Planned Unit Development 83-1 with staff recommendations and amendments, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0. 1. Access road to Greenwald Avenue (Street A) . a} To be 88 foot right-of-way with 24 foot road width designed for T.I. of 7.5. b) From tract boundary to Greenwald Avenue asphalt curb to be constructed on both sides. c) ~~n~/f~t/~~n~tt~ttt~n/~t/t~t~t~/t~~~tt~ttt~~ ~f/t~ntt~t~/t~t~/~n/~~t~/~t~~%/~t/%tt~~t/~~~ ~t~~~-~~/~~/~n~/%t~~1 DELETED. dl Widen paving on Greenwald at intersection with this access road (Street A) to provide left turn lanes, accelleration lanes and right turn lanes as requried by the City Engineer. Developer to acquire right-of-way as necessary at intersection. e) This access road shall be constructed with Phase I development as required by City Engineer. 2. Access to Franklin Street and Main street and/or Railroad Canyon Road. 3. Frontage Road from Main Street to Franklin Street. a) Dedicate 60' right-of-way for Modified Secondary Highway. bl Install rolled gutter on both sides 25' from street centerline. c) t~~t~~~/~'/~t~~~~~~/~~/~~~/~t~~/~~~ll DELETED. d) Construct standard roadway section with 50' from curb to curb (T.I.=7.S). el Provide necessary intersection improvements at Main Street as required by the City Engineer. f) This access road shall be constructed with Phase I development as required by City Engineer. 4. Primary access Road No.2. a) Dedicate 88' riaht_-nf-w~u ~t"'\,.. C:o""t"'\n~:>..... U~~h._._.. Minutes of Planning Commission July 5, 1983 Page 3 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 17413-3 AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 83-1 CONTINUED - dl Construct standard roadway section of 40' from curb to curb (T.!. = 6.0). e) ~t~tt~/~t/~~~t~~tt~~/~~~/~tt~~t/t~~t~~~~~~t~ ~t~/tt~~/~y~~~~/,/t~/t~~/t~t~t~~~tt~~/~t/'tt~~tl ~~~~~~/'~~~/~~I/~I DELETED. fl t~$t~~~/~~~~~~~tt/~tt~~t/t~t~t~~ttt~~/t~~t~~~~~~t~ ~t/~~~~~~/'/~~~/~~~t~~t~t/1t~~t~~~/'~~~/I~~~t~~ ~tt~~Y/~~/t~~~tt~~/~t/~ttt/~~~t~~~tl DELETED. g} This access road shall be constructed with Phase I as required by City Engineer. 6. Alternative Access Road No.3. a) Dedicate 88' right-of-way for Secondary Highway. b) Install curb and gutter 32' from street centerline. cl Install 6' sidewalk on one side only. d) Construct standard roadway section of 64' from curb to curb (T.I. = 7.5.). e) Intersection with Primary Access Road No. 2 shall be at rightangles. - 7. Circulation and Design standards within Tract Boundary. al Streets "A" and "D" 1. Dedicate Street A to provide for 88' right-of-way. 2. Install curb and gutter 32' from street centerline. 3. Construct standard roadway between new curbs CT . I. = 7. 5) . 4. Construct 6' sidewalk on one side only. bl "B", "C", and "VV" Streets (as shown on TTM 17413). - 1. Dedicate to provide for 66 ft. right-of-way. 2. Install curb and gutter 22 feet from street center- line. 3. Construct standard roadway between new curbs. 4. Provide parkways adjacent streets. 5. Construct 6' sidewalk on one side only. c) All local streets "E", "G", "H", "J", "K", "M", "N", "0", "eC", "DD", I'LL", "MM", "NN", "SS", "RR", "WW", "AB", "AC", "JJ", "GG", "HH", "KK" , which have fronting homes upon both sides of the same street and which will be referred to as "double loaded streets", shall provide the follow- ing: 1. Dedicate for 50' right-of-way. 2. Install curb and gutter 18 feet from street centerline. 3. Construct standard roadway between new curb and street centerline (T.I. = 5.5). 4. Provide 6' sidewalk on one side only. 5. Install street signing as requried by City Engineer. 6. 50 ft. right-of-way and 36 ft. curb to curb separation shall be provided for those streets Minutes of Planning Commission July 5, 1983 Page 4 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 17413-3 AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 83-1 CONTINUED as identified. Said streets shall also maintain a minimum 4-1/2 foot walkway around obstructions. Those streets that are single loaded, as defined by Section D below and those streets that are double loaded, as defined by Section C shall pro- vide comparable improvements as that provided by __ Section C and D respectively. dl All local streets which have homes fronting upon one side of a street and which will be referred to as "single loaded streets", shall provide the following: 1. Dedicate 40' right-of-way. 2. Install curb and gutter 14' from street centerline. 3. Construct Modified Tilt Section roadway. 4. Construct 6' sidewalk on one side only, to be located on the same side as ingress and egress to homes abutting these streets. 8. Street "VV" cul-de-sac to be extended southerly to tract boundary. 9.. Street "AB" cul-de-sac to be extended southerly to tract boundary. 10. Dedicate 6Q' right-of-way from street "VV" to the northeasterly tract boundary of Lot 17 and if this access exists. it must be adequate for emergency vehicles, if it does not exist the applicant is to provide concrete spillway across San Jacinto __ River for emergency access to project. This alignment shall directly tie into the future 88' right-of-way adjacent to and northerly of Lot H (Future Park Site) . 11. Prior to final approval of the map, the City must receive a letter from the agency serving water (E.V.M.W.D.) stating that: a) The water system required to serve each and every lot within the subdivision has been installed, and each and every lot will be served upon demand. OR bl The necessary financial arrangements have been made to provide water service to each and every lot and said service shall be furnished upon demand. 12. Prior to final approval of the map, the City must receive a letter from the agency serving sewer (E.V.M.W.D.) stating tha t : a) The sewer system required to serve each and every lot within the subdivision has been installed, and each and every lot will be served upon demand. - OR b) The necessary financial arrangements have been made to provide sewer service to each and every lot and said service shall be furnished upon demand. Minutes of Planning Commission July 5, 1983 Page 5 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 17413-3 AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 83-1 CONTINUED -- 13. The developer shall provide adequate drainage facilities. Said improvements shall comply with the provisions of Section 6.8 of the Subdivision Ordinance, Resolution 83-31 and the recommendation of Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District as required by the City Engineer. 14. The developer shall submit plans to S.C.E. for a layout of the street lighting system. The cost of street lighting, installation as well as energy charges shall be the responsibility of the developer and/or the association. Said plans shall be approved by the City and shall be installed in accordance with the City Standards. 15. All grading shallciOnform to the requirements of Section 6.11 of the Subdivision Ordinance and Chapter 70 of the UBC. 16. Prior to final approval of Tract 17413, the improvements specified herein and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council s~all be installed, or the bonds and agree- ment for said impro'vements, shall be submitted to the City, and all other stated conditions shall be complied with. - I 17. Prior to final approval of the map, Section 6.9-C of the Subdivision Ordinance shall be complied with. Said section refers :to the dedication of subsurface water rights. 18. All of the improvements shall be designed by owner's civil engineer to the specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore. 19.. Meet all requirements of General Telephone. 2U. Meet all requirements of Southern California Edison Company. - 21. Provide fire buffer zone around entire tract perimeter as required by the Riv,erside County Fire Department. 22. Provide the following fire protection. al Water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 2500 gpm. b) Fire hydrants shall be located at each street intersection, if possible but in no event shall there be an interval of more than 300 feet between hydrants in multiple-family zones, 600 feet between hydrants in single-family zones. cl The requirements of the City shall be enforced with. the planning and design criteria to be approved by the Riverside County Fire Department. 23. Pay all applicable fees. 24. CC & R's and Homeowners Management Association Rules and Regulations shall be submitted to the Planning Department to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. The CC & R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use repair and maintenance of all streets, right-of-ways, graded slopes, common areas and open space. The CC & R's shall provide that if the pro- perty is not maintained in the condition required by the CC & R's, then the City after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the area and perform at the Minutes of Planning Commission July 5, 1983 Page 6 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 17413-3 AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 83-1 CONTINUED Homeowner Management Association(s) expense the necessary maintenance. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. 25. The following lots shall remain in open space easements and/or be considered common areas, and maintained as indicated in condition number 24 above. - a) Lots A through G inclusive. b) All graded slopes to include terrace drains, downdrains, curb outlet structures and interceptor drains. c) Include in landscape plan illustration of vegetation on slopes. 26. Meet all requirements of Southern California Gas Company. 27. Landscaping and Lighting be maintained by a landscaping and lighting maintenance assessment district or homeowners association(s) . 28. Bond for drip or sprinkler irrigation system for common areas. 29. Trailers or mobile homes utilized during the construction phase of this project shall be subject to approval by the Community Development Department. -- 30. Finding of no significant impact on the environment for Zone Change. 31. Recognition of EIS prepared for HUD and additional environ- mental information to provide for recertification of EIR. 32. IS.s.uance of a Negative Declaration for Zone Change per Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.). 33. A finding of conformity to the existing General Plan. 34. To "off-set" the impact upon stephens Kangaroo Rat habitat (~ rare species as designated by the State) the applicant shall provide an open space corridor approved by the City and California Department of Fish and Game within the north- erly portion of the annexation project but shall not be provided as part of this tract. 35. Provide the following environmental mitigation measures. a) Lot F water tank area shall remain in indigious vegetative cover except for maintenance of a fuel break to protect adjacent homesites. bl OWners of lots #3 through 23, and 108 through 115 .. shall include a restriction on the deed to protect the riparian setting. cl The Cottonwood Canyon riparian woodland within Lot H "Park Site" shall be retained as an important biological setting and aesthetic amenity. Indigious vegetation on the remainder of the topographically rugged Lot H park area shall be allowed to regenerate following the recent fire and the park site maintained in a natural condition. Concrete debris and dredge spoils along the farm roadway paralleling the Minutes of Planning Commission July 5, 1983 Page 7 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 17413-31 AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 83-1 CONTINUED I creek shall ~e removed by developer. 36. Construct graded two (2) lane road to "future park site" lot H as identifiedl on tract map (reference condition number 10.1. 37. Provide street maintenance through a street maintenance assessment district or homeowners association for public roads. 38. No gated roads. 39. Deed to City 1 acre graded fire station site on Lot 943 with. public improve~ents provided. a1 Relocate lot 943 to the northeast most corner of lot 944 (school site). 40-. Approve street to sitreet intersections as shown for all single loaded stree!t (Subdivision Ordinance 529 calls for 250. minimum spacing! centerline to centerline) . 41. Provide 3 bus facilities (bus stops) as approved by LETS General Manager. - 42. The developer will enter into agreements to mitigate school impactions problems within the City of Lake Elsinore with the Elementary and High School District prior to final map approvals. 43. The developer will rrocess and successfully complete an amendment to the de~elopment agreement changing the southerly access from Railroa~ Canyon Road to Franklin and Main Street, and including insur~nce and hold harmless language with cost of amendment to be borne by developer. 44. The zone change will be approved concurrently with the approval of the Trapt Map # 17413 and PUD 83-1. 45. Building permits shall not be issued until proof of payment of school mitigation fee is presented to City Building Depart- ment. 46. Provide drainage acceptance letter from adjacent property owners to be approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney and recorded. - 47. 1t~~t~~/p~~~~ttt~~/~~~~~~/~~Y/$'/~t~~/tt~~/$tt~~t/i~i/t~ $tt~~t/i~il//~ppt~t~~~t~/~~~~tt~~/~~~~~/~~/t~~/~~tt~/~t~~/~t ~t/7$%/~~~/t~/~~/t~~~tp~t~t~~/~t~/t~/t~~/pt~p~~~~/~~i/ ~t~t~/~t~t~/~~~~~~~~I DELETED. 48. Minimum lot frontage of street cul-de-sacs "HH", "JJII, "KK", shall be 30'. 49. Provide focused EIR for traffic signalization of interior and exterior streets and construct signals as required by City Engineer. 50. Grading operations are of such magnitude to require either: a) Mass grading of the entire project. OR b) A revised cut and fill schedule by phases Minutes of Planning COmmission July 5, 1983 Page 8 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 17413-3 AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 83-1 CONTINUED (cut and fill diagram submitted cannot work with proposed phasing schedule submitted) . .c) Submit a more comprehensive, in depth soils and geology report. Analysis impacts of fills and cuts greater than 60 feet. Submit detailed grading plan by phase. - 51. Primary access to Lot "c" shall be taken from Street "NN" only. Provide emergency access to Lot "c" from Street "A" only. 52. ~p~~t~~~t/~~~~~/~~~~tt/t~/t~~/~~~t~~/~~~t~~/~~~t~/~ t~~t~Att~~/~~~~~~~~~t/~~~~/t~t/~t~/Y"/~~~/'~"/~~t~~ ~~~~~/t~~~~~~/pt~*t~t~~~/t~t/~~~~~ttt~~/~~~/~~~~~ttt~~ ~~tt~ttt~~1 DELETED. 53. Applicant shall submit detailed final Planned Development Plan as per Section 17.37.120, before the issuance of any Building Permits. 54. Applicant shall bond for all public improvements and grading for subject development as required by City Engineer and Chief Building Official. al Bonding shall be done by phases and not by final map(s) on grading. b) Bonding shall be done by final map(s) for all other improvements. 55. Applicant shall obtain off-site slope easements for grading from adjacent property owners. Such easements shall be approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney and recorded. - 56. The recorded Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall require that the Homeowner Association maintain all storm drainage facilities in the development. 57. Class II bicycle lane to be provided along "A" Street (~hich will be named Canyon Lake Hills Boulevard). BUSINESS ITEMS NONE COMMUNITY DE~LOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT Community Development Director,Trevino informed the Commission that he was still working with the City Attorney on the concerns that the Planning Commission haq at prior meetings and will have a report at the next meeting. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - Commis.s.i.oner Saathoff - None Commissioner Washburn - None Commiss.ioner Barnhart _. None Minutes of Planning Commission Ju 1 y 5, 1983 Page 9 PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPpRT AND RECOMMENDATION CONTINUED Chairman Steed - Saturday they graded the landing strip at the airport and are now receivipg airplanes. I understand that the airport was officially clos~d by FAA. Community Development Director, Trevino stated he would check into this. - As brought up with Norm Rub~l, the outflow channel where the water is discharged,the cit~ should put some fencing around it to keep the children from pilaying in it. Perhaps the County Health Department should look into the snack bar trailer at the swap meeit (the one agains t the fence of the cemetery) they are hooked up with water and so forth, and all they have is a piece of plaFtic pipe going into the ground for the discharge. I There being no further busi~ess, mission adjourned at 10:05 ~.M. s.econd by Commissioner washlburn. Approved 4-0 the Lake Elsinore Planning Com- Motion by Commissioner Barnhart, - Approved Whit Steed Chairman Respectfully submitted, ~~ Linda Grindstaff Planning Commission Secretary - ......-.'-:_~r:;~.:,..~'.:,,;<:'~-. ;~.;i,.;;;{<. -,.,- -- .~ "" ., ~ .. MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MRLfi ON ~HE STY. DAY OF .1ULY 1983 FOR EXPEDIENT PURPOSES THE COMMISSION DECIDED TO REVIEW THE ONE ITEM ON THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA PRIOR TO REVIEWING THE ITEMS ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA. THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:34 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Saathoff. ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Washburn, Com- missioner Barnhart and Chairman Steed. Commissioner Dominguez was absent. - MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissione~ Saathoff to approve minutes of June 21, 1983 as submitted, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Single-Family Residence - 17249 Mc Bride - Betty J. Santillanes _ Staff presented proposal for a single-family residence to be located at 17249 Mc Bride. The plan meets all zoning require- ments. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve single-family residence as presented, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to adjourn to the Planning Commission meeting, second by Commissioner Washburn. __ Approved 4-0 -- r i (. ,.' ~ t. MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 19TH. 1983 OF JULY DAY THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:33 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Washburn. ;.~ .~ ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Dominguez, Com- missioner Washburn and Commissioner Barnhart. Chairman Steed was absent. Being as Chairman Steed was ~bsent Commissioner Dominguez conducted the meeting. J :'... :t g~ If ., I .' 1 MINUTE ACTION i ~ Motion by Commissioner Barnhqrt to approve minutes of July 5, 1983 as submitted, second by Comm~ssioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS -- r- 1. Tentative Tract Map 18389 - Art Nelson - Staff presented proposal for a single-family subqivision of thirty five (35) lots, located approximately 700 feet ~outh of Grant Drive on the east side of Machado Street. Staff ~tated that at this time, he would like to expand on condition nu~er 22 (Applicant to pay special fee for sewer plan expansion). Staff informed the Commission that this is a new condition being added to projects and gave a brief back- ground report. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:38 P.M. Asking for those presen~ wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. Bill McKeaver, appl~cant's engineer, was present and stated he would answer any questions the Commission may have on this project. Chairman askeq if there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor. The~e being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Cha~rman then asked for those who opposed. There being no oppositiqn the public hearing was closed at 7:39 P.M. Discussion was he~d on sewer expansion,. adding a dollar figure of $ 7,500.00 to condition number 9 and adding a dollar figure of $ 8,000.00 to condition number 18, road alignment, and retaining as many of th~ walnut trees as possible. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff tq approve Tentative Tract Map 18389 with staff recommendations a~d inserting dollar figure of $ 7,500.00 in condition number 9, inserting dollar figure of $ 8,000.00 in condition number 18, seqond by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 . 1. Machado Street: a) Dedicate to provide for 50 ft. of half width right-~f-way. b) Install curb and gutter 38 ft. from street cente~line and construct standard street impro~ements to centerline. 2. Interior Streets: I , a) Provide a stneet alignment to connect this tract to the property to the north- east and thrqugh to Machado Street. (Prove coord~nation with adjacent pro- perty owner tio the southeast as to location of ~uture "B" Street). b) Dedicate to provide for 60 ft. of right- of-way with a standard knuckle at the bend. cl Install curbs and gutter 18 ft. from street centerline. li! ~ ~~ Minutes of Planning Commission July 19, 1983 Page 2 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 18389 - ART NELSON CONTINUED d) Construct standard roadway between new curbs. 3. Construct standard sidewalks. - 4. Install ornamental street lights. 5. Pay for installation of street name signs. 6. Pay for the installation of stop sign. 7. Payoff any outstanding bonds from Assessment District No.1, or show approval from bond holder to split bonds. Process bond splits if necessary. 8. Construct sanitary sewer to serve all parcels. ~. Contribute funds of $ 7,500.00 to construct adequate drainage facilities for this water shed. Obtain any necessary easements or rights for drainage discharge to properties not owned by the developer. lQ. Provide the city with water availability letter. 11. Supply City Engineer's office with centerline ties for the subdivision prior to release of any bonds on this tr ac t . 12. All public improvements to be designed by owner's civil engineer to specifications of the city. ... 13. Meet all requirements of Southern California Edison Company. 14. Comply with all applicable ordinances and requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department and comply with uniform fire code. 15. Pay all applicable fees at building permit stage. 16. Participate in Landscaping and Lighting District. 17. Pay all public safety fees. 18. Contribute $ 8,000.00 in a traffic signal installation at Lincoln Street. l~. Install six (6) foot high fence along rear of lots 19-35. 2Q. Finding of no significant effect on the environment. 21. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. - 22. Applicant to pay special fee for sewer plant expansion; (Amount not to exceed $300.00 per single family dwelling unit). (Sewage disposal plan subject to approval from the Santa Ana River Regional Water Quality Control Board) . r;' ~ " :: ~ r Minutes of Planning Commission July 19, 1983 Page 3 BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Commercial Project 83-3 - Mounzer Chaarani - Staff presented pro- posal for a commercial ~hopping center to be located at the northwest corner of Linooln Street and Riverside Drive. Com- missioner Barnhart aske~ if staff had a dollar figure for condition number 6? St~ff stated that he was going to propose a quarter of the cost (~hich would be approximately $32,500.00) for the applicant's equitable share of the future traffic signalization at Lincoln and Riverside Drive. Mr. Daniel Possnick, representing Mr. Chaarani, was present and gave a brief summary on the manket analysis that was done. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Commercial Project 83-3 with staff recommendations and inserting dollar figure of approxi- mately $32,500.00 in condition number 6, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 r 1. Provide connection to City sewer as approved by City Engineer. 2. Construct commercial sidewalk 8' along Riverside Drive and Lincoln Street. 3. Construct commercia,! driveways on Riverside Drive, minimum 30' in widtih per City Standards. Southeasterly driveway to be a minimum of 200 feet from Lincoln Street. - 4. Construct commerciall driveways on Lincoln Street per City Standards, minimum 20'. 5. Meet Water District and County Fire Department require- ments for domestic and fire service. 6. Applicant to participate equitably in cost of future traffic signalization at Lincoln Street and Riverside Drive (approximatel~ $ 32,500.00). 7. Applicant to complelte street improvements at the inter- section of Lincoln ~treet and Riverside Drive as directed By the City Enginee~. 8. Install street ligh~s per City Engineer's requirements. 9_. Dedicate water righlts to the City of Lake Elsinore. 10. Agree to participat~ in a Lighting and Landscaping Assessment District'. I ~ 5 ; , ~ I ~ ~ ~ 'I ,...-- 11. Because of increased storm water run-off which will be generated, improve drainage facility along Riverside Drive to Leach Canypn Channel as required by City Engineer or pay a $ 20,000.Op drainage assessment fee. 12. All on-site utiliti~s to be underground. 13. Satisfy the City Engineer that street dedications have been completed. 14. All items depicted pn plot plan/landscape plan and elevations shall be, provided as indicated on the plot plan, unless otherwise mo~ified by the Planning Commission/Design Review Board's cond~tions. 15. Recordation of City Council CC & R's prior to transfer of plans to the City's Building Department. ~ h..... Minutes of Planning Commission July 19, 1983 Page 4 COMMERCIAL PROJECT 83-3 - MOUNZER CHAARANI CONTINUED 16. Pay all applicable Capital Improvement and Public Safety fees. 17. Striping for Class II Bicycle lane. 18. Applicant to pay special fee for sewer plant expansion; (Said fee not to exceed $300.00 per 20 fixture uni ts in commercial project). Sewage disposal plan subject to approval from the Santa Ana River Regional Water Quality Control Board) . - 19. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 20. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. 2. plot Plan for Tentative Tract Map 19357 - Art Nelson - Staff presented plot plan for Tentative Tract Map 19357 which is condition number 3 of the original conditions approved for the tract on June 7, 1983. Discussion was he~d on drainage of lots to street, height of wall between Tentative Tract Map and com- mercial project, and zero lot lines. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Plot Plan for Tentative Tract Map 19357 with staff recommendation, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 1. Applicant to comply with staff requirements for drainage of lots to street. 3. Oral report by City Engineer to be brought up after Planning Commissioner's Report and Recommendation. - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT Community Development Director, Trevino stated that a few meetings Back there was discussion relative to Conditional Use Permits/Variances, do they, or do they not run with the land? Mr. Trevino stated that he had received a reply back from the City Attorney in which he states that: "When an applicant receives a Conditional Use Permit or Variance, that permit or variance applies only to the property for which the application was made, and may not be transferred to another location. If the owner of the business on the subject property changes, then the new owner would be entitled to continue operating the use at the same location for the duration of the permitted time. Since a Conditional Use Permit/Variance/Conditional Exception runs with the land, I would also suggest that whenever an applicant who is not also the owner of the property comes in for one of these procedures, that he be required to obtain the signature of the owner of the property on the application, or provide other written documentation that the owner joins in the request. This is not an absolute necessity, and the failure to do so will probably not give rise to liability on behalf of the City, but I think it would be a safe practice to institute, and one which could provide us with some insulation in the event an owner were to come back to City Hall and complain about the use to which his leased property is being put." - ~ ~ '1' Minutes of Planning Commission July 19, 1983 Page 5 -- I PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPO~T AND RECOMMENDATION Commissioner Barnhart - The qity has a street sign machine, why don't we have more street signs up iidentifying streets? Ci ty Engineer stated that he thought that aill the streets had street signs, but would like a list submitted (where street signs are needed) so that this can be checked out. ,.' Commissioner Washburn - None ~ ~~ I Ii I 'j 1 ~ Commissioner Saathoff - There have been several projects that have been given occupancy permits,: or the approval to go ahead and operate (primarily commercial) where ,landscaping has not been completed for some time. I am wondering wQat the follow up procedure is on this? Mr. Trevino stated that this would be handled by the Code Enforcement Officer, but as you are awarel we only have one Code Enforcement Officer and that person has been workiing on Business License. Once we hire another Code Enforcement Off1cer, that person will receive a copy of conditions that are place on a project to check for landscaping, park- ing, etc. Commissioner Dominguez - Sho~ld look into the possibility of putting directional signs to the diffierent governmental offices (Post Office, Library, Schools) at major i~tersections. ! Clean up on Lakeshore - Lots 1404 and 1406, what ever it takes to clean up. -- BUSINESS ITEM NUMBER 3 - The City Engineer, Norm Rubel gave an oral report regarding street width standards in Country Club Heights and similar hillside areas. Mr. RUDel requested that strelet widths in Country Club Heights and similar hillside areas be red~ced (in hilly areas as narrow as 20 feet, where there is more room we could get 24 feet, and some perimeter areas 28 feet and then go to standard 32 feet). Therefore, I am suggesting 20, 24, 28, and 32, depending on the situation and look at each situation individually a~d determine what is practical. Side- walks would be a consideration also, we are inclined to feel we don't need sidewalks up there at th~ top of a hill, where you rarely see a pedestrian. We are thinking !that you don't need sidewalks in most of the more hilly terrain and do~n in the perimeter maybe sidewalk on one side. Mr. Rubel stated that he would like input from the Commission. Commissioner Washburn asked if this was going to be a massive outlined area defined by the Engineering Department and where these areas are, or are they going to be the Pilanned Unit District areas? Commissioner Washburn stated that he had np problem with Engineering recommendation. Commissioner Saathoff stated that this would almost be on a lot by lot basis. Mr. Rubel stated that! a width would be selected and used for the entire block from intersection to intersection. Commissioner Washburn stated that you need to define the boundary area in which this will occur. The Commission poncurred with the City Engineer's sug- gestion of reducing street wipth standards to 20, 24, 28, and 32 in Country Club Heights and similar hillside areas. , I II ~ ~ ~ ~ Motion by Commissioner Barnha~t to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Washbu~n. Approved 4-0 ~ ~ \' MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 19TH. DAY OF JULY 1983 MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve minutes of July 5, 1983 as submitted, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 . ' BUSINESS ITEMS '- 1. Commercial Project 83-5 - Bill Hall - Staff presented proposal for a 2,400 square foot tire store to be located southeast of the intersection of Lakeshore Drive and Lakepark Street. Mr. Terry Toby, representing the applicant, was present and stated that there might be confusion on the type of roof. Mr. Toby stated the roof would be a metal roof of 26 gauge steel. The mansard itself we propose a Spanish Style of fiberglass, the whole roof is not fiberglass. Discussion was held on elevations. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to deny without prejudice, second by Com- missioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 2. Commercial Project 83-6 - William Buck - $taff presented proposal changing elevations for a previously approved retail professional office complex to be located south of Main Street. Discussion was held on elevation. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Commercial Project 83-6 with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 1. Applicant shall submit to the Design Review Board a land- scape plan detailing trees, shrubs, ground cover and other landscape features. _ 2. Building elevations shall. be constructed as depicted on plans. Any proposed changes will require resubmittal to the Design Review Board. 3. Signing plan for the commercial project shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for approval. 4. All roof mounted equipment, trash area, and ground support equipment shall be effectively screened from public view and subject to approval from the Planning Division. 5. Provide Class II Bicycle lane for Lakeshore Drive. 6. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler systems. 7. All utility services shall be placed underground. 8. Applicant to pay special fee for sewer plant expansion; (Said fee not to exceed $300.00 per 20 fixture units in commercial project). (Sewage disposal plan subject to approval from the Santa Ana River Regional Water Quality Control Board) . - 3. Tri-plex - 314-A-B-C Ellis Street - Jim Peters - Staff presented proposal for a tri-plex to be located at 314 Ellis Street on a 7,150 square foot lot. Staff stated that there are concerns on the driveway, parking, drainage and applicant's plan providing no trash area for the project. Staff informed the Board that the applicant submitted a revised plan on July 18, 1983, but staff has not been able to review the revised plan in detail. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to continue this item to the meeting of August 2, 1983, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 ~ ~ L ~ Minutes of Design Review Board July 19, 1983 Page 2 r-- There being no further adjourned at 8:55 P.M. Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 business, the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board Motion by Commissioner Washburn, second by .j ~ j J ;j ~ ~ '. ~ Approved ~ Whit Steed Chairman Respectfully s ~ - Linda Grindstaff Planning Commission Secretary \I I - ~ J ~ \l a " ., ~ :1 1.1 ~ ~ ~ MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 2ND. DAY OF AUGUST 1983 THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7: 30 P. M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Dominguez. - . ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Dominguez, Com- missioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart and Chairman Steed. Also present were City Planner, Mike Norton and City Engineer, Norm Rubel. MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve minutes of July 19, 1983, as submitted, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Conditional Use Permit 83-8 - Robert G. Williams - Staff presented proposal for a Conditional Use Permit to continue with the business of mobile home sales/real estate sales located at Riverside Drive between Lakeshore Drive and Joy Street. Staff stated that the City Engineer has requested that two additional conditions of approval be added to this application, which will read: Applicant to pay Public Safety Fees, unless waived by the City Attorney, and; - Applicant to participate in traffic signalization at Joy Street northwesterly of Riverside Drive. Applicant's share of cost would be $ 4,273.90. Chairman questioned the addition of these conditions. Discussion was held on the appropriateness of these conditions. -.. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:37 P.M. Asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. Bob Williams was present and stated that he would like to inform the Commission of the history behind this application. Mr. Williams stated that ten years ago he went before the City Council, and at that time there was no such thing as a mobile home sales lot. The only ordinance on the books were trailer and automobile sales. I went before the City Council and said I wanted to use a mobile home for an office and I want to be able to sell mobile homes, do I need special zoning or any conditional use permit? They looked at the ordinances and delayed it for a week and came back and said I did 'not need a special conditional use permit under the existing ordi- nances or a special license other than a Mobile Home License and City Business License to sell real estate. Mr. Williams stated that he goes through this every time there is a change in city staff, and to resolve the problem he decided to apply for a Conditional, Use Permit, and get it approved with a condition that he did not need one in the first place. Mr. Williams objected to the two additional conditions that staff is requesting to add to this ap- plication. Mr. Williams stated that he would like one of two things, either withdraw the Conditional Use Permit and then we go and fight whether or not I have the right to be in under the Grand- father clause or grant Conditional Use Permit and waive the fees until we take out a building permit to improve the whole property. Mr. Williams also stated that he would like it in the minutes that he was doing this, but not giving up his rights under the Grand- father clause and he does not need a Conditional Use Permit and is only doing this to resolve the problems. Chairman asked if there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor of the project. Minutes of Planning Commission August 2, 1983 Page 2 - .,0:....':" CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-8 - ROBERT G. WILLIAMS CONTINUED There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:49 P.M. Discussion was held on the existing "A-Frame" and modular unit. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Conditional Use Permit 83-8 with the two (2) staff recommendations as distributed, and instruct the Planning Secretary to include in the minutes the request to clarify_the applicant's application, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 i. .... 1. Modular office unit to be skirted. 2. Conditional Use Permit to be reviewed after six (6) months. 2. Zone Change 83-3 - Butterfield Development Corporation - Staff presented proposal for pre-zoning 82 acres (which would be annexed to the City under Annexation No. 31) from County Zoning of RR (Rural Residential) to SP (Specific Plan District), adjacent to and east of Highway 74; adjacent to and south of Kecor Specific Plan; north of I-15. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:55 P.M. Asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. Dan Salceda of Forma, spoke in favor of the zone change and annexation. _ There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. ThBre being no oppositon the public hearing was closed at 7:57 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Zone Change 83-3 with ....- staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0- 1. Accurate legal description for project area. 2. Adoption of Ordinance enacting zone change. 3. Conceptual approval of 2.5 dwelling units per acre. .. . 1 4. A finding of consistency with the General Plan. 5. A finding of no significant impact. 6. ~ssuance of a Negative Declaration. BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Annexation Number 31 - Butterfield Development Corporation - Staff presented proposal to annex 82 acres adjacent to and east of High- way 74; adjacent to and south of Kecor Specific Plan; north of I-IS. , Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Annexation Number 31 with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0- ~ ..., i.~ 1. A finding that Annexation will result in a level of services greater than those that presently exist. ~ 2. General Plan Amendment to establish area density. ~ -~. Minutes of Planning Commission August 2, 1983 Page 3 BUSINESS ITEMS CONTINUED ;--.. I . 2. Lot Line Adjustment 82-5 Revised - Missing Link Investors II (% Butterfield Surveys, Inc.) - Staff presented proposal for a revision to Lot Line Adjustment 82-5 to separate the com- mercially designated property from the remainder. Parcell would include the northwest corner of the property; Parcel 2 would remain unchanged, and; Parcel 3 would encompass the rest of the property. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Lot Line Adjustment 82-5 Revised with staff recom- mendations, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 1. Submittal and verification of legal description. 2. Filing of a Certificate of Compliance. 3. Certificate of Compliance to state that a legal access to Parcel 3 will be recorded with the first sale. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT City Planner, Mike Norton stated that there was not a report from the Community Development Director, but the City Engineer wished to pre- sent an item that addresses Railroad Canyon Road. -- The City Engineer stated that they were working on a project that would be sent in to the State to try and get a $200,000.00 Federal Aid Improvement Grant. This grant will be used to reconstruct and raise the grade at two locations of Railroad Canyon Road for 1.3 miles. We are asking the Commission to approve a Negative Declaration which will be forwarded to City Council and recorded by the Couri~y Clerk. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Negative Declaration for the reconstruction of Railroad Canyon Road, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Commissioner Saathoff - If we grant a Conditional Use Permit to an applicant, that applicant is allowed to take occupancy before all the condition~ are met, and then they request another Conditional Use Permit for some other venture, do we have any right to disallow them to proceed with the second Conditional Use Permit, in as much as the first one has not been complied with, or do we have to simply act on the second Condi- tional Use Permit? Commissioner Washburn stated that a Conditional Use Permit runs with the land (referencing the minutes of July 19, 1983 where this item was discussed), so why shouldn't an app11~ant have the right to apply for another Conditional Use Permit. ,.--.. Commissioner Dominguez - None Commissioner Washburn - The severity of parking problems on narrow streets (Prospect, Chestnut and a number of narrow streets in the area) suggest the possibility of staff looking into the reasonableness if the City were to only allow parking on one side of the street. Staff should put together a brief report on which streets it would be feasible to have parking on only one side of the street. .,~ ~ Minutes of Planning Commission August 2, 1983 Page 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONTINUED Commissioner Barnhart - We have instigated and forestalled the curb and gutters for a few businesses on Riverside Drive until Riverside Drive was widened or completed. Do we have any idea of what point of time State is going to do something with that, so we can then ask the businesses there to finish the curb and gutters? The City Engineer stated it was just a matter of us putting pressure on the State to cooperate. Commissioner Barnhart stated either that or we should go back to these people and inform them that the new businesses approved are installing curb and gutter and you should also, because the width of Riverside Drive has been established. I. - Chairman Steed - The Hot Dog Trailer in Alamo's parking lot. A Business License was issued for one year. This was a promotional deal, but the Business license is good for one year (June,1984). I don't see any provisions for sanitary facilities or where waste water goes. I have a problem with people bringing in a portable hot dog stand and being able to set them up on a parking lot and conducting business. I think they should corne under Conditional Use Permits for some control. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 -- '" ~ ~ .., ~ ~ ~. 1 j ~ MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE 2ND. DAY OF AUGUST 1983 MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve minutes of July 19, 1983 r-. as submitted, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Commercial Project 82-9 - Mobil Oil Corporation - Staff presented for approval elevations for a gasoline service station, snack shop and accompanying facilities, which was before the Design Re- view Board on January 14, 1983, at which time the Board requested the proposal be re-designed illustrating a Spanish Motif, and brought back before the Board for review. Commissioner Dominguez stated that there was an error in the location which should be corrected, it should read: South of Casino Drive not Frontier Road. A brief discussion was held on the elevation presented. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve elevation for Commercial Project 82-9 as presented, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-1 Commissioner Washburn voting no ~ 2. Tri-plex - 3l4-A-B-C Ellis Street - Jim Peters - Staff presented proposal for a tri-plex unit to be located at 314 Ellis Street between Sumner and Pottery Streets. Discussion was held on ap- plicant providing a trash area for the project, which was added as condition number 5, drainage and parking. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Tri-plex with staff recommendations and adding condition number 5, which will read: Applicant to provide low wall trash area at the end of the covered parking area, second by Com- missioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 1. Completed Certificate of Survey. 2. Applicant to apply for Encroachment Permit for widening of driveway per Standard No. 207, (width 16'). 3. Lot shall drain to Ellis Street. a) Minimum 1% slope on natural, (grass, etc.) b) Minimum 9.5% in concrete swale. 4. 'Proposal shall be built according to presented plot plan. 5. Applicant to provide low wall trash area at the end of the covered parking area. 3. Single-Family Residence - 218 Campus Way - Latham - Staff presented proposal for a single-family residence to be located at 218 Campus ~. Way. Proposal meets setback requirements. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve single-family residence as presented, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 4. Single-Family Residence - 649 Mill Street - Alongi - Staff presented proposal for a single-family residence to be located at 649 Mill Street. Staff informed the Board that this single-family residence will be contingent upon the outcome of Lot Line Adjustment 83-8, Minutes of Design Review Board August 2, 1983 Page 2 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 649 MILL STREET CONTINUED ,',;'-,-;"' which will be presented to the Planning Commission on August 16, 1983. Staff stated that the primary design meets setback re- quirements. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve single- family residence as presented, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 There being no further adjourned at 8:50 P.M. Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 business, the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board Motion by Commissioner Dominguez, second by Approved, Whi t Steed Chairman -. R~sp~ec. ~fUIIY ;Jb~tted. ~~~~ Linda Grindstaff $ Planning Commission Secretary . (' ~ ~ ;.~' ~, f -11 ...." ,. ~ ... " it rrl MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 16TH. DA Y 0 F AUGUST 1983 THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:30 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Washburn. - ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner Washburn and Commissioner Barnhart. Chairman Steed was absent. Also present were City Planner, Mike Norton, City Engineer, Norm Rubel and Planner, Da n Fi s so ri . Being as Chairman Steed was absent Commissioner Dominguez conducted the meeting. MI NUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve minutes of August 2, 1983, as submitted, second by Commi ss ioner Saa tho ff. Approved 4-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS - I 1. Tentative Parcel Map 19335 - Gary & Charles A. Morris - Staff presented proposal for a seven parcel subdivision of 4.55~ acres, located east of Riverside Drive on the south side of Collier Avenue. Staff stated that at this time the City Engineer would like to modify the last sentence of condition number 10 to read: Construction of cul-de-sac as indicated on Tentative Parcel Map to be deferred to time of issuance of building permit, modify condition number 11 to read: Applicant to obtain recorded drainage release or recorded easement from down- stream property owner, drainage conveyance is per or as agreed by City Engineer, modify condition number 3 to read: Construct one-half of a 76 foot wide Collier Avenue instead of a 66 foot, and modify condition number 4, to read: Dedicate one-half of a 100 foot wide right-of-way for Collier Avenue instead of a 66 foot wide right-of-way for Collier Avenue. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:39 P.M. Asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. Charles A. Morris (applicant) was present and requested the hearing on this project be continued due to the last minute changes and not knowing what they amount to. Chairman asked if there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor of the project. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. Ms. Marilyn Greever, representing the Elsinore Valley Cemetary District, stated they did not oppose the project, but wanted to know what they are going to do with all that water that will come across and into the cemetary? Ms. Greever was informed that this project was on the southerly side toward the channel across the street from the cemetary and the cemetary would not be affected. There being no one else present wishing to speak in opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:43 P.M. Discussion was held on street right-of-ways and condition number 11. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to continue Tentative Parcel Map 19335 to the meeting of September 6, 1983, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 - 2. Conditional Use Permit 83-9 - Edward Snyder - Staff requested the public hearing on Conditional Use Permit 83-9 be continued to the meeting of September 6, 1983, so that staff can review and analyze this application further. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:50 P.M. Asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of the project. There being no one present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:51 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to continue Conditional Use Permit 83-9 to the meeting of September 6, 1983, second by Com- missioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 Minutes of Planning Commission August 16, 1983 Page 2 3. Conditional Use Permit 83-10 - Josephone Geloso - Staff requested the public hearing on Conditional Use Pemrit 83-10 be continued to the meeting of September 6, 1983, so that staff can review and analyze this application further. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:52 P.M. Asking for those present wishing to speak in favor. There being no one present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:53 P.M. Motion by Commissioner.... Washburn to continue Conditional Use Permit 83-10 to the meeting of September 6, 1983, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 4. Zone Change 83-5 - City of Lake Elsinore - Staff presented proposal for a pre- annexation zone change for approximately 12 acres, northerly of the intersection of Interstate 15 and Highway 74 (to complete the pre-annexation zoning for Annexation Number 29, which LAFCO has required as part of the application). Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:54 P.M. Asking for those present wish- ing to speak in favor. There being no one present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. Ms. Marilyn Greever, represent- ing Elsinore Valley Cemetary District, stated that this is the project that might effect the water flow that is coming across the cemetary. Ms. Greever, was informed that this is a pre-annexation zone change and no development is proposed at this time. Ms. Greever, stated that they were concerned with developer making arrangements for that water flow. There being no one else present wishing to speak in opposition the public hearing was closed at 8:00 P.M. Discussion was held on the location of project and community design element for the area. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Zone Change 83-5 with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 1. A finding of conformance with the General Plan. - 2. No significant impact upon the environment. 3. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. ...: BUS I NESS ITEMS 1. Residential Project 83-2 - William Buck - Staff requested this item be continued to the meeting of September 6, 1983. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to continue R 83-2 to the meeti ng of September 6, 1983, second by Commiss ioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 2. Lot Line Adjustment 83-8 - George Alongi - Staff presented proposal for a Lot Line Adjustment north of Mill Street, south of Country Club Boulevard, at inter- section. Mr. George Alongi was present and questioned conditions of approval. Discussion was held on condition number 1 being deleted; condition number 2 being modified to read: Pay Public Safety fees on the total number of dwelling units established; condition number 4 modified to read: Record an agreement with City of Lake Elsinore, to run with the property, to guarantee future Public (off-site) Improvements, full centerline plus 6 additional feet from northwest boundary of Lot 5 along Mill Street to the centerline of High Street; condition number 5: deleting the second sentence (The City shall bear one-half the cost of the water line extension across the Mill Street frontage of corner Lot No.6). Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Lot Line Adjustment 83-8 with staff recommenda- tions as amended, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 - 1. lnt7~~~/t~~/t~fn~f/7~ti/~/.'/./~~/./~1~t711t~~~i/wjt~/t~~/w~~t~fli/pf~p~~~~ paft~l/. DELETED. 2. Pay Public Safety fees on the total number of dwelling units established. Minutes of Planning Commission August 16,1983 Pa ge 3 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 83-8 - GEORGE ALONGI CONTINUED ~ I 3. Comply with County Fire Department requirements. 4. Record an agreement with City of Lake Elsinore, to run with the property, to guarantee future Publ ic (off-site) Improvements, full centerl ine pl us six (6) additional feet from northwest boundary of Lot 5 along Mill Street to the centerline of High Street. 5. Extend the water main across the frontage of lots 3, 4, and 5. The main size shall be that required to deliver 500 gallons per minute fire flow. 6. Filing of Certificate of Compliance. 7. Provide street lighting as required by City Engineer. 3. Lot Line Adjustment 83-9 - M.M. Grinel - Staff requested this item be continued to the meeting of September 6, 1983. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to continue Lot Line Adjustment 83-9 to the meeting of September 6, 1983, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 4. Commercial Project 83-7 - Lake Elsinore Mini Storage - Alfred Anderson - Staff presented proposal for site approval for an expansion of a mini storage build- ing, located at the southwest intersection of Riverside Drive and El Toro Road. Mr. Anderson was present and stated he was in agreement with the conditions. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Commercial Project 83-7 with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Barnhart. ~ Approved 4-0 1. Appl icant shall meet all City Codes. 2. Applicant to pave all driveways and parking areas. (L.E.M.C.17.66.030) 5. Industrial Project 83-2 - Art Nelson - Staff presented proposal for a bus storage yard to be located south of Coll ier Avenue, north of Minthorn Street, approximately 700 feet west of Poe Street. Staff also informed the Commission that after discussion with the City Attorney, it was determined that the Com- mission will need to adopt a resolution determining the proposed use is com- patible with the zoning, this resolution is before you tonight for review and adopti on. RESOLUTION NUMBER 83-3 - The Commission discussed the resolution and requested the resolution be modified to include definition of bus storage yard. Title for Resolution Number 83-3 will now read: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA DETERMINING THAT THE PROPOSED USE OF A BUS TRANSPORTATION TERMINAL IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE M-l (MANUFACTURING DISTRICT ZONE) ~. - Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Resolution Number 83-3 with amendments, second By Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 Mr. Art Nelson was present and spoke on the project. At this time Commissioner Barnhart moved to approve Industrial Project 83-2 with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 1. Applicant shall meet with all City Codes. 2. Applicant to meet Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Section 17.66.030 (Paving Requirements). 3. Applicant to build per plot plan submitted. ~ LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF HELD ON THE 6TH. DA Y 0 F SEPTEMBER 1983 - THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:33 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by City Manager, Robert Trevino. ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Dominguez and Chairman Steed. Commissioner Washburn was absent. Commissioner Barnhart excused absence, on vacation. Also present were City Manager, Robert Trevino, City Planner, Mike Norton, City Engineer, Norm Rubel and Planner, Dan Fissori. MI NUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve minutes of August 16, 1983, as submitted, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved. 3-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Conditional Use Permit 83-9 - Edward Snyder - Staff presented proposal for a Conditional Use Permit for ultralight flying, sales office and incidental camping at 1900 Campbell Street. Staff stated that some Engineering conditions were not included in the report and the City Engineer feels that they can be brought up at this time. The City Engineer stated that he would like to add three new conditions and modify three of the existing conditions. The Chairman stated that it would depend upon the financial impact on the applicant and that the applicant should have time to review the conditions. It was recommended thatthis project be post- poned to the next meeting. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to continue Conditional Use Permit 83-9 to the meeting of September 20, 1983, second by Commissioner Domi nguez . Approved 3-0 2. Conditional Use Permit 83-10 - Josephine Geloso - Staff presented proposal for a Conditional Use Permit to continue with the business of automobile repair, near the southwest corner of Railroad Avenue and Marian Street. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:42 P.M. Asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. Bruce Geloso was present and questioned condition number 6. The City Engineer explained condition number 6 to the applicant. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:46 P.M. Discussion was held on whether or not use was appropriate under Tourist Commer~ial Designation, type of work areas provided (stalls) and condition number 6 adding the following: Recommend deferment until City demands. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Conditional Use Permit 83-10 with staff recommendations and amendment, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 3-0 l. 2. - 3. 4. 5. 6. Applicant to remove debris from the site not normally associated with automobile repair. Applicant to provide two (2) parking spaces at/near site in question. Appl i cant to pay all Publ i c Sa fety fees. Applicant to meet County of Riverside Fire Department recommendation. Appl icant shall dedicate 20 feet of additional right-of-way for Lakeshore Drive in conformance with the General Plan. Applicant to install street improvements to the centerline on Lakehsore Drive to City Standards and Code requirements. Recommend deferment until City dema nds . 7. Plans for public improvements shall be prepared by applicant's registered Civil Engineer. " Minutes of Planning Commission September 6, 1983 Pa ge 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-10 - JOSEPHINE GELOSO CONTINUED 8. Legal description for 20 foot dedication shall be prepared by applicant's Engineers and verified by City Engineer. Deed and Title Report shall be supplied to City Engineer. 9. Applicant to meet the City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County Health Department and Regional Water Quality Control Board',s requirements for subsurface sewage disposal. - 3. Tentative Parcel Map 19335 - Gary & Charles A. Morris - Staff presented proposal for a seven parcel subdivision of 4.S5:t' acres, approximately 1,000 feet east of Riverside Drive on the south side of Collier Avenue. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:52 P.M. Asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. Fred Crowe of Butterfield Surveys, representing the applicant, spoke in favor of the project. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:55 P.M. Discussion was held on changing the verbiage in condition number 19 from IIper City Engineer's specificationsll to IIper City Ordinance specificationsll; ingress and egress out of parcel 6; septic system at elevation 1260 (lower end of project). Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Tentative Parcel Map 19335 with staff recommendations, second by Com- missioner Saathoff. Approved 3-0 1. Comply with the County Fire Department requirements with regard to pipe sizing in project limits and hydrant type and location: - 2. Obtain Encroachment Permit from Cal Trans, to provide for a temporary connection to Collier, when future building permit is issued on parcel one (1) or any other parcel. ..., 3. Construct one-half of a 76 foot wide Collier Avenue roadway with 100 foot right-of-way (State Highway 74) to City and Cal Trans Standards at time of issuance of building permits for parcel number 1, if required by City of Lake Elsinore. "t., 4. Dedicate one-half of a 100 foot wide right-of-way for Collier Avenue in conformance with Cal Trans requirements. Applicant's engineer to establish right-of-way location in relation to Railroad property. 5. Dedicate subsurface water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore. 6. Provide City of Lake Elsinore with a water availability letter from E.V.M.W.D. 7. Assist in forming Lighting and Landscaping Assessment District. 8. Meet all requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore, the Riverside County Health Department and the Regional Water Quality Control Board for sewage disposal at time of issuance of building permits. 9. Comply with all requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and City Codes. - 10. Applicant to obtain recorded drainage release or recorded drainage easement from downstream property owner or otherwise provide for drainage as approved by City Engineer. 11. Cul-de-sac length exceeds the 600 feet allowed by Code. Commission must make a finding that proposed revised length of approximately 725 feet is justified by exceptional conditions applicable to the land and that the finding is necessary for preservation of a substantial property right. Provi de paved temporary turn around at cul-de-sac until other hal f of cul- de-sac is constructed. .~ Minutes of Planning Commission September 6, 1983 Page 3 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19335 - GARY & CHARLES A. MORRIS CONTINUED r- 12. Parcel 7 shall be eliminated to provide for no more than six (6) numbered parcels and parcell shall have a minimum of 1/2 acre net. 13. Individual parcels shall connect to community sewer system if and when that service is available. 14. Pay all Public Safety fees. 15. Recordation of Redevelopment CC & R1s. 16. A finding of conformance to the General Plan. 17. -A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 18. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. 19. Install ornamental street lights per City Engineer's specifications. 4. Conditional Use Permit 83-11 - Lavona Guss/ Frank Arcul eo - Sta ff presented proposal for a Conditional Use Permit to locate a mobilehome sales lot at Mission Trail between Railroad Canyon Road and Malaga. Chairman opened the public hearing at 8:04 P.M. Asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. Frank Arculeo was present and questioned condition number 2,8, 9, 11, 17, 18 and 20. Discussion was held on condition number 2, 8, 9, 11, 17, 18 and 20. The City Engineer stated that the applicant's equitable share of cost to extend the storm drain (condition number 18) woul d be $ 22,000.00 total cost. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chair- man then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 8:23 P.M. Staff requested that this item be continued to the meeting of September 20,1983, so that staff can work with the applicant to mitigate con- cerns on the above mentioned conditions. Motion by Commissioner Domingue"z to continue Conditiona1 Use Permit 83-11 to the meeting of September 20,1983, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 3-0 BUSI NESS ITEMS 1. Lot Line Adjustment 83-9 - M.M. Grinel - Staff presented proposal for a Lot Line Adjustment west of Railroad Canyon Road, south of 1-15 and north of Mission Trail, so as to have access for Parcel "C" off Casino Drive. Mr. Grinel was present and questioned condition number 5, 2, 7, 8, 9 and 6. Discussion was held on lot configuration, condition number 5, 2, 7, 8, 9 and 6. The City Engineer stated that the applicant's equitable share of cost for traffic signal would be $ 12,466.60. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Lot Line Adjustment 83-9 with staff recommendations and amending condition number 6 to include applicant's equitable share of $ 12,466.60 for traffic signal; condition number 7 to include applicant to provide letter to City indicating he does not own subsurface water rights, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 3-0 - 1. Applicant to meet Riverside County Fire Department requirements at building permit stage. 2. Applicant to provide City with service letter from Elsinore Valley Municipal Water Distri~t at building permit stage. 3. Applicant shall meet the requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside Health Department and the Regional Water Quality Control Board for subsurface sewage disposal. 4. Install ornamental street lights per City Engineer's specifications at building permit stage. -" Minutes of Planning Commission September 6, 1983 Page 4 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 83-9 - M.M. GRINEL CONTINUED 5. Install Street Improvements for Casino Drive to centerline of existing 80 foot right-of-way (Frontier Road) as required by City Codes and Standards at the building permit stage. Pending disposition of General Plan amendment from major to modified secondary highway. Dedicate additional right-of-way required by the General Plan. 6. Applicant to pay equitable Traffic Signal Mitigation fee of $ 12,466.60 for Casino Drive and Railroad Canyon Road at building permit stage. 7. Dedicate subsurface water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore. Applir.ant to provide letter to City indicating he does not own subsurface water rights. 8. Form Lighting and Landscaping District. 9. Provide public improvements at building permit stage on San Jacinto Ri ver Road as necessary to conform to City Codes and Standa rds . - THE CITY MANAGER REQUESTED A TEN MINUTE RECESS', SO THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY GO INTO CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS AN ITEM ON THE AGENDA REGARDING POSSIBLE LITIGATION. THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECONVENED AT 8:58 P.M. 2. Lot Line Adjustment 83-10 - Robert Connally - Staff presented proposal for a Lot Line Adjustment north of Collier Avenue, east side of Riverside Drive, which was approved by the Planning Commission on July 17, 1979. Since that time difficulties were experienced by the parties involved pertaining to easements to the rear properties. It is the intent of this Lot Line Adjustment to change the property line on the parcels involved, so as to allow for circulation to all parcels. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Lot Line Adjustment 83-10 as presented, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 3-0 - 3. Residential Project 83-2-- William Buck - Staff presented proposal for an apart- ment complex on 4.92~ acres near the southwest intersection of Lincoln Street and Flannery Street. Staff is recommending denial of this proejct based on the follow- i ng: a) That the General Plan takes precedence over Zoning. b) That a finding of conformance to the General Plan cannot be made. c) That the Zoning Ordinance is an Obsolete document taken from an obsolete General Plan. Mr. Buck was present and gave history on the project stating that he started purchasing the properties in July 1981, and about 1982 when I :was :protessing soils test, surveying, feasibility studies and architectural design review plans to submit to the city, the city was in the process of going through their General Plan I was informed that the property woul d remain R-3. Discussion was hel d on the property not being in conformance with the General Plan pertaining to density. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to deny Residential Project 83-2 based on staff recommendation, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 3-0 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT None ." Minutes of Planning Commission September 6, 1983 Pa ge 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - Commissioner Saathoff - None Commissioner Dominguez - None Chairman Steed - None Commissioner Washburn - absent Commissioner Barnhart - excused absence (on vacation) Riverside County Planning Department Case Number 4019 - Zone Change from R-3 (Genera1"Residentia1) & C-1jC-P (General Commercial) TO R-1 (One Family Dwelling) & C-1jC-P (General Commercial). The Planning Commission has no recommendation to forward to Riverside County Planning Department. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 3-0 - .._~ - MI NUTES 0 F HELD ON THE 6TH. MI NUTE ACT! ON LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DA Y 0 F SEPTEMBER 1983 Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve minutes of August 16, 1983, as submitted, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Appro ved 3-0 BUSINESS ITEMS - 1. Commercial Addition - Huntsman Mobilehome Park - Staff presented proposal for a 2,277"f: square foot addition on 9.81!" acres approximately 300 feet south of Joy Street, east side of Machado Street. Discussion was held on addition, and loss of open space. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Commercial Addition with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 3-0 1. Full payment of Park Capital Improvement Fund fees ($ 4,273.00). 2. Meet all other requirements of Ordinance 572. 2. Residential Project 83-5 - Al Hertz - Staff presented proposal for a four-plex structure at the northwest corner of the fntersection of Lakeshore Drive and Benedict Avenue. Staff is recommending denial without prejudice based on lack of sewer service to site. Development would require a sewer extension from Matich Street and Lakeshore Drive. Sewer service to an area outside of original downtown cannot be approved without Regional Water Quality Control Board approval to increase sewage treatment plant capacity. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to deny without prejudice Residential Project 83-5, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 3-0 - 3. Res i denti a 1 Project 83-7 - Ron Pera rdi - Sta ff pres ented proposa 1 for two., dupl ex units on adjacent 8,300 square foot lots, northwest intersection of Heald Avenue and Mohr Street. Discussion was held on project not being in conformance with the General Plan. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to deny Residential Project 83-7 due to incompatibility with General Plan (density), second by Commissioner Dominguez. After further discussion on General Plan densities, Commissioner Dominguez withdrew hi s second and Commi ss ioner Saa tho ff withdrew hi s motion. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Residentia,l Project 83-7 with staff recommendations and project subject to City Legal Counsel as to conformance with the General Plan density, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 3-0 1. All items depi cted on plot pl an el evations will be constructed as shown. 2. Applicant to provide an enclosed trash area. 3. All areas not designated for buildings, parking, patios, and walkways shall be landscaped. Landscaping shall be approved by Planning Division. 4. All landscape areas shall provide automatic sprinkler systems. - 5. Construct curb, gutter and sidewalk across the Heald and Mohr Street frontage of the property to be developed. Construct street paving to centerl ine of street along both the Mohr Street and Heal d Avenue frontage. Pavement to be to city standards. Sidewalk to be 6 feet wide and adjacent to the curb. 6. Water service is available from a main on Heald Avenue. Applicant must pay for a service connection and meter. A fire hydrant exists at the corner. 7. A sewer line exists along both frontages. Applicant must construct sewer lateral with cleanout at property line. Minutes of Design Review Board September 6, 1983 Pa ge 2 RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 83-7 - RON PERARDI CONTINUED -- 8. Applicant must dedicate a 2.5 foot width of property along the alley and improve one-half of alley to city standards with redwood header, asphalt paving and a center 2 foot wide concrete gutter. 9. Applicant must provide engineered plans for street and alley improve- ments, and submit a grading plan and certificate of survey. 10. Pay all Capital Fees required by the City Code in addition to the no rma 1 permit fees. 11. Provide copy of title report to the City Engineer. 12. Comply with the subdivision map act regarding lot consolidation. 4. Single-Family Residence - 16668 Arnold Avenue - H.R. Koger % D.C. Campbell - Staff presented proposal for a single-family residence to be located at 16668 Arnold Avenue. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve single- family residence as presented, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 3-0 There being no further business the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board adjourned at 10:00 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 3-0 oS: Approved Whi t Steed' Chairman Respectfully submttted, ~A7 Linda Gri nds ta ff Planning Commission Secretary MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 20TH. DA Y 0 F SEPTEMBER 1983 THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:30 P.M. -- PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Saathoff. ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner Washburn and Chairman Steed. Commissioner Barnhart excused absence, on vacation. Also present were City Manager, Robert Trevino and City Engineer, Norm Rubel. MI NUTE ACTI ON Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve minutes of September 6, 1983, as submitted, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 4-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS - 1. Conditional Use Permit 83-9 - Edward Snyder - Staff presented proposal for ultralight flying, sales office and incidental camping at 1900 Campbell Street, (this item was continued from the September 6 meeting, so that the applicant could have time to review the revised conditions and the new three conditions, which the City Engineer requested to have added to this project). Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:34 P.M. Asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. William Meyer, representing the applicant, stated that they were in favor of the Conditional Use Permit, but not with these stipulations and conditions. Mr. Meyer stated opposition to conditions 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,12,13,15,16,19 and 20. Chairman asked Mr. Meyer if they would like to have time to meet with staff to discuss their concerns? Mr. Meyer stated he would like to discuss this project with staff and try to alleviate some of the problems. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:50 P.M. Discussion was held on paving requirements along Mission Trail (the applicant is not within 300 contiguous feet of Mission Trail, therefore it is not appropriate for his project to be conditioned with all the paving requirements, but if the ap- plicant does get permenent/semi permanent status, it would be appropriate to pay some Capital Improvement Fees); total acreage involved; owner participa- tion; identifying numbers on aircrafts (ultralights) and policing of ultralights. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to continue Conditional Use Permit 83-9 to the meeting of October 4, 1983, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 2. Conditi ona 1 Us e Permit 83-11 - La vona Guss/ Frank Arcul eo - Sta ff pres ented pro- posal for Conditional Use Permit to locate a mobil ehome sal es lot at Miss ion Trail between Railroad Canyon Road and Malaga, (this item was continued from the September 6 meeting, so that the applicant and staff could meet and mitigate concerns on the conditions for this project). Chairman opened the public hearing at 8:02 P.M. Asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. Frank Arculeo was present and questioned condition number 8. Mr. Arculeo stated that at the last meeting he had requested to skirt the two models only on the side facing Mission Trail. The Chairman stated that at the last meeting the conversation was that the sales office would be fully skirted and the two models would be skirted on the Mission Trail frontage. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 8:04 P.M. Commissioner Saathoff requested clarification on condition number 17 and 18. City Engineer gave explanation on condition 17 and 18. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Conditional Use Permit 83-11 with staff recommendations and amending condi- tion number 8 to read: IlMobilehome sales office to be fully skirted and two (2) models closest to Mission Trail to be skirted only on the side fronting Mission Trail, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 Minutes of Planning Commission September 20, 1983 Pa ge 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-11 - LAVONA GUSS/FRANK ARCULEO CONTINUED 1. Applicant to provide any dedications and off-site improvements if such are needed. 2. Pay traffic signalization assessment fee of $ 5,086.40 as determined by City Council Resolution No. 83-19. The amount represents! 40% of the total fee of $ 12,716.00 (applicant is utilizing only 40% of the property). - 3. Pay Public Safety Fees as determined by City Council Resolution 83-4. 4. Applicant to provide street light per City Engineer's specifications. 5. Meet all requirements of Riverside County Fire Department. 6. Applicant to rehabilitate all parking areas and public improvements as necessa ry. 7. On-site wastewater sewage system shall be approved by the County Health Department, Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Lake Elsinore. 8. Mobilehome sales office to be fully skirted and two (2) models closest to Mission Trail to be skirted only on the side fronting Mission Trail. 9. Applicant to provide a ten (10) foot wide landscape bed adjacent to Mission Trail (excepting parking area). Plantings shall be approved by the Planning Division. 10. Planting area shall provide permanent and automatic sprinkler system. ... 11. All items shown on plot plan shall be provided as depicted. All changes will necessitate resubmittal . 12. All signs shall be approved by the Planning Division. 13. Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to a one (1) year review. 14. A finding of conformance to the General Plan. 15. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 16. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. 17. After one (1) year of operation, repair the center 14 foot width of existing paving, which is deteriorating, as required by the City Engineer. Completely reconstruct this 14 foot width if tests indicate this is needed in the opinion of the City Engineer. Sand seal the remainder of the existing paving from curb line to street centerline. 18. Provide a plan to be approved by the City Engineer for receiving, channel- ing and discharging into Mission Trail the storm water run off onto applicant's property from the drainage pipe under Casino Drive. Applicant must sign an acceptance letter to the satisfaction of the City Attorney to eliminate any City liability. Drain into the street must be under the sidewalk and directed downstream. Pay to City $ 22,000.00 to construct a storm drain pipe and drain inlet in the street to carry storm water to a point of disposal. The $ 22,000.00 to be paid over a three year period. The first installment of $ 7,330.00 to be paid after one year of operation. The second installment of $ 7,330.00 plus $ 733.00 inflation or $ 8,063.00 to be paid after two years of operation and the third installment of $ 8,063.00 plus $ 806.00 inflation or $ 8,869.00 to be paid after three years. - Minutes of Planning Commission September 20, 1983 Page 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-11 - LAVONA GUSS/FARNK ARCULEO CONTINUED - 19. Dedicate subsurface water rights. 20. Form a Lighting and Landscaping District. 21. Provide will serve letter for water service from E.V.M.W.D. 3. Conditional Exception Permit 83-6 - Howard Palmer (Carl's Junior) - Staff presented proposal for a Conditional Exception Permit to vary from the height requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Section 17.94.025(E), required height is 20 feet, requested height is 65 feet, south of Interstate 15, west of Railroad Canyon Road and east of San Jacinto River Road. Chairman opened the public hearing at 8:10 P.M. Asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. Fred Crowe 0 f Butterfi el d Surveys, I nc., representing the applicant, was present and stated that they were in agree- ment with the conditions, and would answer any questions the Commission may have on the project. There being no one else wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 8:12 P.M. Discussion was held on height of sign, scenic and visual views from the freeway and surrounding areas. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Conditional Exception Permit 83-6 with staff recommendations, second by Chairman Steed. FAILED TO PASS: VOTE 2-2 (Commissioners Dominguez and Steed - AYES. Commissioners Saathoff and Washburn - OPPOSED) CHAIRMAN RECOMMENDED AT THIS POINT BEING A DEADLOCK VOTE, THAT IT GO TO COUNCIL FOR THEIR APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL. 4. Special Permit 83-1 - Michael Maltby - Staff presented proposal for a Special Permit to establish a Preschool/Day Care Center at the northwest intersection of Riverside Drive and Richard Street. Chairman opened the public hearing at 8:29 P.M. Asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. Michael Maltby was present and stated he had concerns on some of the condi- tions. Chairman asked if he would like a continuance, so that he could meet with staff to discuss his concerns. Mr. Maltby stated that he would like this item continued to the next meeting, so that he could meet with staff and discuss concerns and get clarification on some of the conditions. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 8:34 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to continue Special Permit 83-1 to the meeting of October 4, 1983, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Commercial Project 83-8 - Carl's Junior - Staff presented proposal for a 4,200 square foot commercial structure (fast food restaurant) and two commercial stores with 3,280 and 2,800 square feet, south of Interstate 15, west of Railroad Canyon Road, north of Casino Drive (Highway 71). Mr. Fred Crowe of Butterfield Surveys, Inc., representing the applicant, was present and questioned conditions number 10, "Extending curb, gutter and 8 foot sidewalk to 1-15 off ramp"; condition number 16, requesting clarification. The City Engineer stated that this would be to redesign raised median at intersection of San Jacinto River Road and Casino Drive; condition number 24, would like to have deleted the following: "Applicant shall obtain drainage acceptance letter from Cal Trans; condition number 17, believes this would be done when Cal Trans reviews the street improvement plans; condition number 29, would like the Drainage Mitigation Fees deferred until development Minutes of Planning Commission September 20, 1983 Page 4 COMMERCIAL PROJECT 83-8 - CARLIS JUNIOR CONTINUED occurred across Railroad Canyon Road, we think that is a more equitable time to collect those downstream fees and to try and mitigate the drainage problems. Discussion was held on these requests. Mr. Crowe asked if he could have ,a few minutes to discuss conditions 24 and 29 with his client? - CHAIRMAN STATED THAT THE COMMISSION WOULD RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES, TO ENABLE MR. CROWE TO CONVERSE WITH HIS CLIENT. THE COMMISSION RECONVENED AT 9:00 P.M. After discussion with his client, Mr. Crowe, requested that condition number 24, be amended by deleting the following verbiage from said condition: "Ap_ plicant shall obtain drainage acceptance letter from Cal Trans II , II from the south- west corner of the site"; and change the figure of $ 10,000;00 to $ 14,380.00 so that it will be in agreement with condition number 29. Condition number 10, to read: "Defer extending curb, gutter and 8 foot sidewalk until development occurs on the other side". Discussion was held on the above mentioned conditions. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Commercial Project 83-8 with staff recommendations and amending condition number 24 by deleting the words "Ap_ plicant shall obtain drainage acceptance letter from Cal Trans"; "from the south- west corner of the site"; and changing the $ 10,000.00 to $ 14,380.00; amending condition number 16, by adding the words II raised median", second by Commissioner Domi nguez. Approved 4-0 PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: 1. All items depi cted on plot pl an and el evations shall be provi ded as indicated, unless otherwise roodified by the Design Review Boardls conditions (including the revision discussed in the body of this report). Any proposed changes must be resubmitted to the Design Review Board for approval. 2. Interior design shall incorporate a recreational motif (Carl's Jr.). 3. All roof roounted equipment, trash area and ground support equipment shall be effectively screened from public view and subject to approval by the Planning Division. 4. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler systems. - 5. All utility services shall be located underground. 6.. All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six (6) incb high concrete curb. 7. Reciprocal parking agreement for the entire project to be implemented within the CC & R's. 8. Staff recordation of CC & Rls as required by City Council. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 9.. Casino Drive to have one-hal f street right-of-way width of 40 feet with one-half pavement width of 32 feet from centerline to curb. This is ... subject to Council approval of General Plan Amendment downgrading Casino Drive from a major (1001-761) to a roodified secondary (801-641). If street is not downgraded, a 50 foot half street right-of-way will be required and a street width of 38 feet from centerline to curb face. Construct street paving from centerline to curb by City Standards using a Traffic Index of 7.5. The existing right-of-way in excess of this width (approximately 201) is recommended to be abandoned. Minutes of Planning Commission September 20, 1983 Page 5 COMMERCIAL PROJECT 83-8 - CARL'S JUNIOR CONTINUED - 10. On Railroad Canyon Road a 55 foot one-hal f street width exists in con- formance with the General Plan. Install curb and gutter 43 feet from centerline for Railroad Canyon Road. Extend curb, gutter and 8' side- walk to 1-15 off-ramp. Construct street paving from curb to center of future roadway to City Standards using a Traffic Index of 8.5. Construct raised curb median 6' wide along Railroad Canyon Road. The alignment of the median to be approved by the City Engineer, once the traffic lanes have been established. 11. On San Jacinto River Road install curb and gutter 16 feet from center- line of existing 80 foot right-of-way. Construct paving from curb to center of future roadway to City Standards using a Traffic Index of 6.5. A 16 foot width of excess right-of-way is recommended to be abandoned along San Jacinto River Road. 12. Applicant's engineer to provide Title Report and prepare legal description and exhibits of excess right-of-way proposed to be abandoned. 13. Furnish City Engineer with soils report to include street pavement design. 14. Construct standard 8 foot sidewalks adjacent to curb on all surrounding streets. Construct driveway approaches to City Standards, 30 foot wide. 15. Applicant to provide street signs and striping as required by the City Engineer. 16. Applicant to redesign raised median intersection of San Jacinto River Road and Casino Drive as required by the City Engineer. 17. Obtain encroachment permit from Cal Trans for street improvements into freeway right-of-way. 18. Install ornamental street lights per City Ordinance and standard specifications and at locations approved by the City Engineer. 19. Applicant to assist in forming Lighting and Landscaping District. 20. Meet Riverside County Fire Department requirements for fire protector and locations of fire hydrants. 21. Provide letter from Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District regarding water service availability. 22. Dedicate subsurface water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore by recorded documents. 23. Meet the requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside Health Department and the Regional Water Quality Control Board for sewage disposal. Sign agreement with the City of Lake Elsinore and/or EVMWD to participate in future Regional Sewage Collection, Treatment and Disposal System. 24. Provide hydrology and hydraulic study. Design and construct drainage facilities as required by the City Engineer conforming to City Standards. Deposit with City $ 14,380.00 as an equitable contribution toward conveying storm water run off to a safe point of disposal. This contribution is in addition to construction of needed drainage facilities included in approved development plans. Minutes of Planning Commission September 20, 1983 Pa ge 6 COMMERCIAL PROJECT 83-8 - CARL'S JUNIOR CONTINUED 25. Pay equitable Traffic Signal Mitigation fee of $ 15,620.00 for Casino Drive and Railroad Canyon Road. 26. Plans and specifications and all Civil Engineering work for public improvement shall be provided by developer for approval by the City Engineer. - 27. Dedicate a small triangular portion of property at southeast corner of site to the City for public right-of-way. 28. Landscaping height of 36" maximum shall be maintained at the intersection of Casino Drive and San Jacinto River Road. 29. Abandonment of excess public right-of-way to applicant shall be handled during project approval and processing. The abandonment proceeding to be compl eted prior to issuance of occupancy. It is recommended that City Council approve excess right-of-way abandonment, conditioned upon applicant paying above mentioned signalization fee and $ 14,380.00 Drainage Mitigation fee. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT The League of California Cities will be holding their 85th Annual Conference in San Francisco, October 2 through the 5th. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - Commissioner Saathoff - On the Preschool/Day Care Center, there was reference to the fact that this was going to be in a R-3 Zone. R-3 Zone does not allow for this type of use without a special permit. At the last meeting we were advised that the General Plan takes precedent over previous zoning. My question is then should'nt the remarks have been addressed to the General Plan Zoning rather than to R-3? City Manager, Trevino stated that at the present time we have a problem because the zoning is not consistent with the General Plan. The City Attorney and I are presently working on something that will be brought to the Council on Tuesday, which will take care of that particular situation. Commissioner Dominguez - Graham and Scrivner - A project was to be there and the developer went over and got rid of the improvements (he tore up the sidewalk, curbing and everything else) it was directed by Councilwoman Valenzuela to staff to have those improvements put back after a certain time. It has been almost a year and nothing has happened. Staff stated that the records would have to be researched, but they would check into it. Improvements on Riverside Drive (The Embers and Kay's Barn). Staff stated that they were in correspondence with the State on these. Truck yard before you qet to North Shore Drive Inn. There are some big trailer trucks there and they are hauling dirt, etc. and storing it there.- we have no knowledge of a business there. - Commissioner Washburn - Asked what we were doing in getting more planners? City Manager, Trevino stated that he had received about fi fteen appl ications, and that he had njred an Administrative Assistant for the Redevelopment Agency. Would the new staff members or will Mike Norton or someone else be working on the ordinances for the General Plan, dealing with the Land Use Map? City Manager, Trevino stated that he was going to write it himself. Chairman Steed - Enforcing parking ordinance downtown. I understand that there was conversation with Captain Thompson about having Code Enforcement Officer perhaps deputized to at least have the authority to write tickets. l~e still have the same Minutes of Planning Commission September 20, 1983 Page 7 PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONTINUED problem on Main Street, it has not been alleviated. City Manager, Trevino stated that we would have a report before Council (maybe October 11) with a plan for downtown, because of the assessment district, we are also going to change some parking arrangements plus perhaps parking on one side of the street. . At that time 11m going to have one Code Enforcement Officer to issue citations. Commissioner Barnhart - absent. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Com- missioner Dominguez. Approved 4-0 ----- , MI NUTES 0 F HELD ON THE 20TH. MI NUTE ACT! ON LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1983 Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve minutes of September 6, 1983, as submitted, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 -- BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Commercial Project 83-8 - Carl IS Junior - Staff presented proposal for a 4,200 square foot commercial structure (fast food restaurant) and two commercial stores with 3,280 and 2,800 square feet, south of Interstate 15, west of Rail- road Canyon Road, north of Casino Drive (Highway 71). Discussion was held on architectural design on both commercial structures, and screening of roof mounted equipment for both roofs. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Commercial Project 83-8 with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Domi nguez. Approved 4-0 1. All items depi cted on plot pl an and el evations shall be provi ded as indicated, unless othe~tise modified by the Design Review Board's conditions (including the revision discussed in the body of this report). Any proposed changes must be resubmitted to the Design Revi ew Board for approval. 2. Interior design shall incorporate a recreational motif (Carl's Jr.) 3. All roof mounted equipment, trash area and ground support equipment shall be effectively screened from public view and subject to approval by the Planning Division. 4. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler systems. - 5. All utility services shall be located underground. 6. All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six (6) inch high concrete curb. 7. Reciprocal parking agreement for the entire project to be implemented within the CC & R's. 8. Staff recordation of CC & Rls as requried by City Council. 2. Residential Project 83-8 - Winchester Associates - Staff presented proposal for a multiple four-plex unit development to be located north of Nashland Avenue, east of Quail Drive. Staff also informed the Board that he had discussed this project with the City Attorney, and the City Attorney stated that he did not have any problems with this project (regarding density). The City Engineer asked to have the applicant repair the sunken area in the street on Nashland Avenue. The City Engineer was informed that this was a dedicated street and this would be the City's responsibility. Discussion was held on applicant providing trash receptacles for this project. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Residential Project 83-8 with staff recommendations, and adding condition number 11, whi ch wi 11 read: "Appl i cant to provi de trash receptacl e area, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 4-0 - 1. Proposal to be constructed per plot plan submitted. 2. All landscape areas shall provide automatic sprinkler systems. 3. Pay all Publ ic Safety fees. 4. Improve drainage outlet onto Riverside Drive. Minutes of Design Review Board September 20, 1983 Page 2 RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 83-8 - WINCHESTER ASSOCIATES CONTINUED 5. Seal all the existing asphalt paved street. 6. Provide improved drainage at the end of cul-de-sac as directed by City Engineer. 7. Rai se cl ean out to gra de. 8. Provide delineation on guard rail on end of Quail Drive. 9. Remove existing fire hydrant at Tract boundary. 10. All lots to drain to street. 11. Appl i cant to provi de trash receptacl e a rea. There being no further business, the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board adjourned at 9:34 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Washburn, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 Approved, - Whit Steed, Chairman Respectfully submitted, C::t~"--"~~ Linda Grindstaff, Planning Commission S ec reta ry MI NUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 4TH. DAY OF OCTOBER 1983 THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:30 P.M. - PLEDGE OF ALLEGAINCE was led by City Planner, Michael Norton. ROLL CALL found Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart, and Chairman Steed. Commissioner Saathoff was absent. Also pres~nt were City Planner, Michael Norton and City Engineer, Norm Rubel. MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve minutes of September 20, 1983, as submitted, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Conditional Use Permit 83-9 - Edward Snyder - Staff presented a request from the applicant for a continuance to the meeting of October 18, 1983. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to continue Conditional Use Permit 83-9 to the meeting of October 18, 1983, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 2. Special Permit 83-1 - Michael Maltby - Staff presented proposal for a Special Permit to establish a Preschool/Day Care Center at the northwest intersection of Riverside Drive and Richard Street. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:35 P.M. Being as there was no one present wishing to speak in favor or ,-- opposition, the public hearing was closed at 7:36 P.M. Discussion was held on retaining the Palm trees on Riverside Drive; condition number 16 and 17. Mr. Maltby (applicant) stated that he would like to leave the Palm trees where they are, because they afford protection to the children, also they would like to put a block wall on Riverside Drive, and there will not be access to the property from Riverside Drive, everything will come off the side street. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Special Permit 83-1 with staff recommendations, but del ete the words "and stri pi ng" from condi tion number 16. Discussion was held on deleting these words from condition number 16. COM- MISSIONER BARNHART AMENDED HER MOTION TO: APPROVE SPECIAL PERMIT 83-1 WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS AND ADDING THE WORDS "AND STRIPING AS NECESSARY ON RICHARD STREET" TO CONDITION NUMBER 16, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: 1. Yearly review of Special Permit 83-1 by City Staff. 2. Property to have chain link perimeter fencing. 3. Structural designs and elevations must go before the Design Review Board for revi ew. - 4. Trim Palm trees (on north side of Richard Street). 5. Project to meet all applicable City, County and State Codes. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 6. Install curb and gutter 38 feet from centerline on Riverside Drive and 16 feet from centerline on Richard Street. 7. Construct paving to City and Cal Trans standards, from curb to center- line on Riverside Drive using a traffic index of 8.5 A 12 foot width of paving on north side of centerline exists and appears adequate, but must be tested. Construct paving on Richard Street from curb to center- line to City standards using a traffic index of 6.0 Minutes of Planning Commission October 4, 1983 Page 2 SPECIAL PERMIT 83-1 - MICHAEL MALTBY CONTINUED 8. Construct a 6 foot wide sidewalk on Riverside Drive frontage and a 4.5 foot wide sidewalk on Richard Street. 9. Driveway access shall be from Richard Street only. 10. Provide a street light. 11. Work with the City to pa rti ci pate in a Li ghti ng and Landscapi ng District. - 12. Construct cross gutter at Riverside Drive and Richard Street. 13. Connect to City Sewer and install cleanout at property line. There is evidence that a sewer lateral exists to the site. 14. Provide to the City a water will serve letter. 15. Provide fire protection as required by the County Fire Department. 16. Provide street signing and striping as necessary on Richard Street as required by the City Engineer for traffic safety. 17. Obtain Encroachment Permit from Cal Trans for improvements in Ri vers i de Dri ve. 18. Palm trees to remain if they do not seriously interfere with street construction. Applicant shall trim Palm trees. - 19. Pl a ns and s peci fi ca tions for a 11 0 ff-s ite i mpro vements s ha 11 be prepared by applicant's Civil Engineer for approval by the City. 20. Applicant agrees to no parking on Richard Street for traffic safety reasons. BUS INESS ITEMS NONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT NONE - City Planner, Michael Norton, stated that the City Engineer would like to make a presentation. City Engineer, Norm Rubel, presented report and plan for one way traffic on Lake- shore Drive_from Graham Avenue to Main Street, and he will propose to the City Manager that this matter be presented to the City Council on October 11, 1983. The City Engineer also presented a plan for angle parking on the west side of Main Street. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - Commissioner Barnhart - Striping on Lakeshore Drive (from where Graham and Lakeshore come together going towards Four Corners)-there is no striping on that street. Com- missioner Dominguez stated that they were going to redo that street. City Engineer, Rubel, stated that they were hoping to resurface and sand seal that street this Fall. Commissioner Washburn - None Commissioner Dominguez - Would like to have better location maps in the agendas. Minutes of Planning Commission October 4, 1983 Page 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONTINUED ----- Commissioner Dominguez stated that he would also like to have answers on the recommendations he made at the last meeting, pretaining to: Graham and Scrivener, improvements being put back; Improvements on Riverside Drive (The Embers and Kay's Barn); Truck yard before you get to the North Shore Drive Inn. Chairman Steed - Billboards - questions the one down at the botton of the hill toward Railroad Canyon Road, I think this is an illegal billboard, but nothing has ever been done about it. We have a new Code Enforcement Officer on board, and I hope we have him get out and when they see something like a business operating without a license that they will do something. I noticed the old Sunshine Market there is a new business in there and also, where Quick Silver use to be, I understand that Barnes is in there, they've split off the use on Corydon Road. That has never had a business license, even when they were there, and they still don't have one. Hope that they will check those people out. Commissioner Saathoff - absent. ~ Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 4-0 ----- MINUTES OF HELD ON THE MI NUTE ACTION LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 4TH. DAY OF OCTOBER 1983 Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve minutes of September 20, 1983, as submitted, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 BUSINESS ITEMS --' 1. Single-Family Residence 1340 Roger Street - Fausto Grano - Staff presented pro- posal for a single-family residence to be located at 1340 Roger Street. Mr. Grano was present and stated that the structure would be stucco and not lap siding. Mr. Grano also questioned conditions 2,3,4,5,7, and 12, stating that he could not afford these conditions. Discussion was held on condition number 2: with Chairman stating that this dedication was required to maintain street widths; condition number 3 and 4: being deferred and to have letter of agree- ment attached to the Deed of Trust; condition number 5: main water line exists in Mill Street, applicant to extend 8 inch main up Avenue 7 to Roger Street, and a 1 inch line from terminus at Avenue 7 and Roger, and along Roger Street extend 1 inch line to point of service, and defer extending 8 inch water main along Roger Street and fire hydrant with letter of agreement attached to Deed of Trust; condition number 6: sewer service not available in that area, it would be septic at this time, with letter of agreement that if sewer is in- stalled that applicant will hook into sewer system; condition number 7: if found out through Edison Company that a power pole will be located on the street, we can attach a light with no cost to the applicant, all he would have to do is pay the energy fees for one year. I f pol e is there we will hang a light on it, but if no pole, will defer; condition number 8: defer with letter of agreement attached to Deed of Trust; condition number 12: maintaining an all weather road. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Single-Family Residence at 1340 Roger Street with staff recommendations and conditions 3,4,5, 7,8 to be deferred and to have a letter of agreement attached to Deed of Trust, and adding condition number 14 which will read: Applicant to d~dicate water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 - PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: 1. Approval of Lot Line Adjustment to be submitted on lots 56,57, and 58. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 2. Dedicate five (5) feet added right-of-way along Roger Street for a 25 foot one-half street width. The City Standards require a 28 foot one- half street width and a consequent dedication of 8 feet. Staff will ask the City Council to approve an additional street width standard for a 50 street width with 36 foot roadway. 3. I nstall curb and gutter 18 feet from centerl i ne on Roger Street. In- stall 6 foot sidewalk adjacent to the curb and a driveway approach on Roger Street. Deferred and to have 1 etter 0 f agreement attached to Deed of Trust. 4. Pave Roger Street from gutter to centerline to City Standards using a Traffic Index of 5, along applicant's frontage. Deferred and to have letter of agreement attached to Deed of Trust. - 5. Main water line exists in Mill Street, applicant to extend 8 inch main up Avenue 7 to Roger Street, and a 1 inch line from terminus at Avenue 7 and Roger, and along Roger Street extend 1 inch line to point of service, and defer extending 8 inch water main along Roger Street and fire hydrant with letter of agreement attached to Deed of Trust. Minutes of Design Review Board October 4, 1983 Page 2 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 1340 ROGER STREET CONTINUED -- 6. Sewer service shall comply with requirements of the City, the Health Department and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. 7. If found through Edison Company that a power pole will be located on the street, we can attach a light with no cost to the applicant, all he would have to do is pay the energy fees for one year. If pole is there we will hang a light on it, but if no pole, will defer with letter of agreement. for the installation of a street light. 8. Provide recorded agreement to defer public improvements in the alley. Deferred and to have letter of agreement attached to Deed of Trust. 9. Plans and specifications for off-site improvements to be provided by developer's engineer. 10. Work with City to include this property in a Landscaping and Lighting District. 11. Pay Capital Improvement Fees per Ordinance 572. 12. Access to site along Avenue 7 shall be graded and base applied as needed for all weather access. 13. Provide grading plan and certificate of survey. - 14. Applicant to dedicate water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore. 2. Revision to Residential Project 82-6 - John L. Peterson - Staff presented a revision to Residential Project 82-6 (for a breezway, the original plans had no such breezway). The Engineering Department noted a possible drainage problem. It was felt best to divert the water through a breezway between the two structures. Discussion was held on drainage, maintenance, type of materials to be used (plastic or asbestos). Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Revision to Residential Project 82-6 as presented, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 There being no further business, the lake Elsinore Design Review Board adjourned at 8:30 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 Approved, Whit Steed Cha i rman Respectfully su?mitted, cfl,<<4V /Jv-~7 Linda Gri nds ta ff Planning Commission Secreta ry MI NUTES OF HELD ON THE 18TH. LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION DAY OF OCTOBER 1983 THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:30 P.M. - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Barnhart. ROLL CALL found Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart and Chairman Steed. Commissioner Saathoff was absent. Also present were City Planner, Mike Norton and City Engineer, Norm Rubel. MI NUTE ACTI ON Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve minutes of October 4, 1983, as submitted, second by Commissioner Washburn. Appro ved 4-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS - 1 . Conditional Use Permit 83-9 - Edward Snyder - Staff presented proposal for a Conditional Use Permit to establish an ultralight aviation park, sales office and to enable on-site (incidental) camping at 1900 Campbell Street. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:35 P.M. Asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. Meyer, representing the applicant, was present and questioned conditions 16, 18, 19, and 22, stating that for a small businessman to come out here and do business in the community, the cost factor figures are unprohibited. Being as there was no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:42 P.M. Discussion was held on condition number 16 (traffic safety mitigation fees); condition number 19 (street improvement fees); business being utilized in the flood plain area; FAA responses (FAR 103 and FAR 91); air corridors; identification numbers on ultralights; rules and regulations for the park; condition number 18 and condi- tion number 22. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Conditional Use Permit 83-9 with a recommendation of deletion of condition number 18 (dealing with the underground water rights, because they do not own the property, they are leasing the property); with a recommendation that condition number 19 be brought into a fair share amount, amortized over that time frame, but the Planning Commission feels that this is an over indulgence; also, on condition number 22 recommend that the public safety and capital improvement fees, specifically that the storm drain fee be deleted, since they are a collection basin for the waters, and the park capital fee be deleted, since they act as a recreational park, they should not fall under the same requirements as specified in Ordinance 572 also, they are temporary and that street capital improvement fees be pared down, because of the percentage of property they're actually using is not equivalent to the same as normal construction of single-family residences, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Appro ved 4-0 PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: - 1. Follow all requirements of the County Health Department. 2. All aerial operations shall occur between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and Dusk. 3. Application shall be for a period of three (3) years, subject to annual rev; ews . 4. Prior to issuance of business license or camping permits, applicant shall submit to the Planning Division a statement containing a description of the facil iti es to be provi ded for the use of the campers and a statement of the proposed use of the incidental camping area, which shall include: a} Approximate dates of occupancy, or a statement that the facility is intended to be operated year-round. b) Type of use intended, including use of recreational vehicle for camping purposes, if any. Minutes of Planning Commission October 18, 1983 Page 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-9 - EDWARD SNYDER CONTINUED c) Number and type of sanitary facil ities. d) Maximum number of camping parties to be accommodated at anyone time. -- e) Evidence of approval from Health and Fire Departments. 5. Appli~ant to meet all requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration. 6. Applicant to meet all requirements of the State Park Area Manager. 7. Finding of conformance to the General Plan. 8. Finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 9. Issuance of a Negative Decl aration. 10. Applicant to provide adequate on-site parking to the public for air shows. 11. Ultralights to be numbered, so as to provide identification (Procedure will follow an F.A.A. approved method, as administered by the A.O.P.A., CAircraft Owners and Pilots Association). ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 12. Applicant to meet County of Riverside Fire Department requirements. 13. Applicant to provide adequate signs for street terminations and delineation for traffic control at the location of the barricades at existing Campbell Street and Railroad Canyon Road South, as required by the City Engineer. 14. Applicant shall provide additional 20 foot length and 10 foot width of pavement at the end of Campbell Street and Railroad Canyon Road South for driveway entrance to proposed site, and also, to minimize deterioration of the existing public street paving. Thickness of base and paving to be equal to existing pavement on Campbell Street. Eliminate dirt ramp over curb and the illegal access from Railroad Canyon Road South. - 15. Applicant shall provide a hydrology study and make necessary provisions to grade this site to insure storm drain water run-off away from the end of Campbell Street and Railroad Canyon Road South. 16. Pay equitable vehicular traffic safety mitigation (signalization) fee. The fee to be recommended to the City Council is approximately $ 16,550.00, payable $ 5,000.00 the first year, $ 5,500.00 the second year, and $ 6,050.00 the third year. 17. Assist the City in forming a Lighting and Landscaping District. 18. Dedicate underground water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore. 19. Applicant to contribute $ 36,000.00 to street improvements on Mission Trail, because applicant utilizes a large property with no direct frontage, but the use of streets by applicant will generate traffic and cause congestion on streets. The burden for off-site improvements on Mission Trail should not fall entirely onto tne lots fronting on Mission Trail. The recommended contribution to Mission Trail off-site improvements is based on the follow- ing rationale: The total cost of off-site improvements to street centerline of a planned 76 foot roadway for 1,400 foot frontage from Campbell Street to Malaga Street is $ 144,000.00. These improvements include paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lighting and improved drainage. It is assumed that appl icant shoul d contribute one- fourth, or $ 36,000.00 of the cost of these future off-site improvements to the centerline of Mission Trail. It is - Minutes of Planning Commission October 18, 1983 Page 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-9 - EDWARD SNYDER CONTINUED -- 20. proposed that the $ 36,000.00 be paid over a three year period at $ 12,000.00 per year. Provide to City, drainage release and/or easement for storm water run-off discharges from pipes and ditches concentrating onto applicant's property. Indemnify City from 1 i abil ity as approved by City Attorney. 21. Sewage facilities shall comply with City, County Health Department and Regional Water Quality Control Board. 22. Pay Public Safety and Capital Improvement fees: TOTAL $ 44,693.00 $ 14,897.00 $ 29,795.00 $ 89,385.00 Street Capital Improvement fee: Park Capital fee: Storm Drain fee: 23. Provide water availability letter and evidence of compliance with County Fire Department requirements. 24. Provide street light, if determined by the City Engineer to be necessary. -- 2. Tentati.ve Parcel Map 19261 - Centennial Properties - Staff presented proposal for a four C4t parcel subdivision of 9.95:!" acres, approximately 1,200 feet southeast of Railroad Canyon Road. Chairman opened the public hearing at 8:22 P.M. Asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. Bob Belzer of Centennial Properties, was present and requested that condition 8 through 15 be imposed on building permit on parcel 4, and that condition 16 and condition 21 througn 23 be spl it across both parcel s) and presumed that condition 14 will be at building permit stage. Being as there was no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman asked for those who opposed. There tieing no opposition the public hearing was closed at 8:27 P.M. Discussion was held on applicant's request; parcel 2 and ingress/egress on parcel 4. Mr. Belzer stated that they would like to do a Lot Line Adjustment (on parcell and 2) and create 1 parcel. The City Engineer stated that this coul d be taken care of on the map before it is recorded. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Tentative Parcel Map 19261 with staff recommendations with condition 21 through 23 tpertaining to parcel 2, existing parcel 4) to be split, condition 8 through 15 (perhaps wording" where by it has reference to Mission Trail/Malaga or Mission Trail/Casino Drive), that those items be split - those would be referenced to Malaga/Casfno Drive area - Delete parcel 2 and leave numbering of parcel up to s,taff, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 4-0 PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: 1. All formally established landscaping to remain. 2. Applicant to sign reciprocal parking agreement for the entire site. 3. Comply with all requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and City Codes. 4. Meet all requirements of Ordinance 572. 5. A finding of conformance to the General Plan. 6. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 7. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. Minutes of Planning Commission October 18, 1983 Page 4 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19261 - CENTENNIAL PROPERTIES CONTINUED ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 8. Casino Drive is proposed in the General Plan to be 100 feet right-of-way with 76 foot roadway. Staff will recommend in a General Plan Amendment that this street be downgraded to 80 feet right-of-way with 64 feet of roadway, curb to curb. Therefore, no dedication will be required if the proposed General Plan Amendment is approved. No additional dedication is required on Mission Trail. The General Plan requires 50 one-half street dedication for right-of-way on Casino Drive with the curb line 38 feet from center1 i ne. ..... 9_. Install curb and gutter across the Casino Drive frontage of this property at time of Building Permit issuance. The curb shall be 32 feet from centerline, if the General Plan Amendment is approved. 10. Install an 8 foot wide commerica1 sidewalk across the Casino Drive frontage of this property at time of Building Permit issuance. 11. Construct paving on Casino Drive from curb1ine to centerline to City Standards using a Traffic Index of 7.5. Submit tests to show that exist- ing paving conforms to City Standards. The paving to be deferred to B.uilding Permit issuance. 12. Repair the center 14 foot width of existing paving, which is deteriotat- ing, as required by the City Engineer. Completely reconstruct this 14 foot width if tests indicate this is needed in the opinion of the City Engineer. Sand seal the remainder of the existing paving from curb1ine to street centerline. This requirement to be imposed as condition of aui1ding Permit issuance. - 13. Before Building Permit issuance, submit soil and geology report which includes street design. 14. Provide a plan to be approved by the City Engineer for receiving, channel- ing and discharging into Mission Trail the storm water run-off discharged onto applicant's property from pipes under Casino Drive. 15. Applicant must sign an acceptance letter to the satisfaction of the City Attorney to eliminate any City liability, for storm water run-off dis- charged onto applicant's property from existing pipes under Casino Drive. Provide an equitable share ($ 15,000.00) of cost to provide off-site facilities to collect and carry storm water run-off to an adequate point of disposal. Applicant to clean drain pipe under Mission Trail. This condition to be enforced at time of Bui1 ding Permit issuance. 16. Provide street lighting on Mission Trail and Casino Drive, at time of Building Permit issuance, conforming to standards approved by the City Council . 17. Plans and specifications for off-site public improvements must be prepared at time of issuance of Building Permits per Ordinance Number 572. 18. Agree to participate in a Lighting and Landscaping District. - 19. Agree to participate in the cost of Regional Collection and Treatment of Sewage. Comply with the City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside Health Department and Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements on sewage disposal, at time of Building Permit issuance. 20. Provide letter from E.V.M.W.D. for water service availability and comply with the County Fire Department regarding fire protection requirements. Dedicate underground water rights to the City. Minutes of Planning Commission October 18, 1983 Pa ge 5 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19261 - CENTENNIAL PROPERTIES CONTINUED - 21. Pay, at time of Building Permit issuance, a traffic signalization fee of $ 30,000.00 to mitigate traffic safety hazards. 22. Pay Public Safety and Capital Improvement fees, at time of Building Permit issuance: Street Capital Improvement fee: Park Capital fee: Storm Drai n fee: TOTAL $ 13,003.00 $ 4,334.00 $ 8,668.00 $ 26,005.00 23. Provide trees in sidewalk along Mission Trail and Casino Drive, at Building Permit issuance, if required by the City Council. BUSINESS ITEMS - 1 . Commercial Project 83-9 - R & B Investors - Staff presented proposal for a 4,250 square foot commercial office structure to be located on the west side of Riverside Drive, 300 feet north of Joy Avenue. Mr. John Matson, represent- ing the applicant, was present and asked for clarification on condition number 17 and 21. Mr. Matson stated that on condition number 10 they had no problem with this as long as through their recalculations, they do not loose a parking space or have a problem meeting landscape requirements, or have to change the b_uilding size. Staff clarified condition number 17 and 21 for Mr. Matson. Discussion was held on condition number 9 (8 foot wide commercial sidewalk). Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Commercial Project 83-9 with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: 1. All items depicted on plot plan and elevations shall be provided as indicated, unless otherwise modified by the Planning Commission conditions. 2. Applicant shall pay Public Safety and Capital Improvement fees per Resolution No. 83-4 (P.S. $ 1,275.00 + C.LF. $ 1,495.20 = $ 2,770.20 total t. 3. All utility services to be located underground. 4. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 5. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: - 6. Dedicate 20' front right-of-way along total property frontage on River- side Drive in conformance with the General Plan. Riverside Drive is classified as a Major Highway (lOa' right-of-way and 76' curb to curb). Existing one-half street right-of-way width is 30 feet. 7. Construct curb and gutter 38 feet from centerline per Cal Trans Standards. 8. Construct paving from curb to center of roadway to City and State Standards using a Traffic Index of 8.5. Submit tests to show that existing paving conforms to City Standards. 9. Construct commercial sidewalk 8 foot wide along Riverside Drive adjacent to curb. Minutes of Planning Commission October 18, 1983 Page 6 COMMERCIAL PROJECT 83-9 - R & B INVESTORS CONTINUED 10. Construct commercial driveway to City Standards 25' minimum width. 11. Furnish City Engineer with soils report to inc1 ude street pavement des i gn . 12. Install street lights per City Ordinance and Standard Specifications and at locations approved by the City Engineer. 13. Applicant to provide street signs and striping as required by the City Engineer and Ca1 Trans. Existing striped bike trail along Riverside Drive shall be replaced. 14. Plans and specifications for public improvements shall be provided by developers Civil Engineer. 15. App1icant1s engineer to furnish Title Report and deeds for right-of-way dedication to the City Engineer. 16. Obtain encroachment permit from Ca1 Trans for Riverside Drive (SH 74) street improvements. ...,; 17. Applicant to assist in forming Lighting and Landscaping District. 18. Meet Riverside County Fire Department requirements for fire protection and location of fire hydrants. 19. Construct standard sewer lateral from the existing 12" mainline sewer in Riverside Drive to proposed right-of-way and install sewer c1eanout __ at property line per City Standards. 20. Provide letter from Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District regarding water servi ce. 21. Dedicate subsurface water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore by recorded document. 22. Provide trees in sidewalk if and as required by the City Council. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT City Planner, Mike Norton, presented to the Planning Commission for their review a Business License for Lake Motors (Loyd Bridges) for a used car sales and car rental at 2006 East Lakeshore Drive. Discussion was held on the existing building, type of sign and landscaping. The Planning Commission stated that they had no problem with this business license. City Planner, Mike Norton, informed the Planning Commission of the City/County Conference to be held on November 3, 1983, at The Red Lion Inn in Ontario. If any of the Commissioners wish to attend this conference, please notify the Planning Secretary befbre October 28th, so that reservations can be made. City Planner, Mike Norton, informed the Planning Commission that on Monday, October -- 24, 1983, he will move over to the City Manager1s office to begin his new position as Assistant to the City Manager. Also, the two (2) new Planners will start on Monday, October 24, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Commissioner Dominguez - Truck yard before you get to the North Shore Drive Inn. Staff stated that the Code Enforcement Officers were working on this ,matter. Minutes of Planning Commission October 18, 1983 Page 7 PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONTINUED Commissioner Washburn - Asked the City Engineer about the responsibility of Wasson Canyon, since it is heavily silted up, is this the responsibility of Riverside County Flood Control, or the City's responsibility? City Engineer stated that this is the City's responsibility, however we have diverted the flow, turned it and diverted it away from the outflow channel to keep the silt out of the canyon. The City Council has sold 20,000 yards of material out of that silt Basin, so we have taken steps to remove some of the silt. Would like the City Planner to pass on to the Code Enforcement Officers that t~ere are large containers (metal containers) by Pacific Castings along Collier that should be moved. Commissioner Barnhart - This came up at City Council meeting about parking on one side of the street on Graham. Commissioner Barnhart stated that this would be fine if they would grade the alley way. It is understood that they have looked at the alley, and it is possible to grade, so that may alleviate it, but I also noticed that on the right hand side of the street (going up Graham) there are no driveways except at the mortuary, all the way up, but on the other side of the street there are driveways on every lot. Commissioner Dominguez stated that a study has been made of this and the City Engineer has all of this informa- tion. Commissioner Barnhart withdrew her objection she had earlier. Chairman Steed - none - Commissioner Saathoff - absent Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 MINUTES OF HELD ON TH E MI NUTE ACTION LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 18TH. DA Y 0 F OCTOBER 1983 t~otion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve minutes of October 4, 1983, as submitted, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 4-0 - B US I NESS ITEMS 1 . Commercial Project 83-9 - R & B Investors - Staff presented proposal for a 4,250 square foot commercial office structure to be located on the west side of Riverside Drive, 300 feet north of Joy Avenue. Mr. Matson was present and requested that on condition number 4 (pertaining to the block wall) that they be allowed to have an option on the block wall, since the block wall will probably contrast with the brick they will use. Mr. Matson asked that they be allowed to use brick veneer or appropriate wood that would be identical to the fascia on the north elevation, or that condition number 4 be optional subject to approval from the Planning Division. Discussion was held on the applicant's request with the Board suggesting that the block wall coordinate with the building materials used on the building. Discussion was also hel d on the type of material to be used for the structure and the applicant providing a trash container. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Commercial Project 83-9 with staff recommendations and amending condi- tion number 4 to: Trash collection container and block wall to coordinate to building materials of building, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: 1. All items depicted on plot plan and elevations shall be provided as indicated, unless otherwise modified by the Design Review Board's conditi ons . - 2. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler sys tems . 3. All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six (6) inch high concrete curb. 4. Trash collection container to be provided and block wall to coordinate to b.uil di ng material s of bui 1 di ng. 5. All roof mounted equipment, trash area, and ground support equipment shall be effectively screened from public view and subject to approval from the Planning Division. 6. Meet all requirements of Ordinance 572. 2. Single-Family Residence - 629 Mill Street - George Alongi - Staff presented proposal for a single-family residence to be located at 629 Mill Street. Mr. Alongi was present and questioned condition number 4 and 5. Discussion was held on architectural design and condition number 4, participating in Lignting and Landscape District, and condition number 5, extension of 12" water main. Mr. Alongi stated that they had discussed the extension of a 6" line,not a 12" line. A lengthy discussion between Mr. Alongi and the City Engineer was held on condition number 5. The Board suggested that condition number 5 be negotiated between staff and Mr. Alongi. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Single-Family Residence at 629 Mill Street with staff recommendations with condition number 5 amended to: Determined by City Engineer and applicant in negotiations, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 - Minutes of Design Review Board October 18, 1983 Page 2 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE - 629 MILL STREET - GEORGE ALONGI CONTINUED - PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: 1. Applicant to construct per plot plan submitted, unless changed by Design Review Board. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 2. Comply with City Encroachment Permit issued September 2, 1983, for Mi 11 Street off-si te improvements. Pl an for off-si te improvements is on file with the City Engineer's office. 3. Record an agreement for deferment of Country Club Boulevard street improvements, as was required for adjacent residence at 649 Mill Street. 4. Agree to participate in formation of Lighting and Landscaping District. 5. Pay for extension of 12 inch water main across total lot frontage. To be determined by City Engineer and applicant in negotiations. 6. Comply with the City of Lake Elsinore, County Health Department and Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements for subsurface sewage disposal. - 7. Comply with the County Fire Department requirements. 3. Laundry/Storage Room - 16422 Joy Street - John L. Peterson - Staff presented proposal for the construction of a laundry/storage room to be located between Machado and Riverside Drive. Discussion was held on time frame for completion of the laundry/storage room. Mr. Peterson stated that provided the weather was good, this project could be completed within a couple of months. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Laundry/Storage Room at 16422 Joy Street~ with staff recommendation, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 4. Garage/Storage Room - 407 North Riley - A.A. Attridge - Staff presented pro- posal for the construction of a garage/storage room to be located at 407 North Riley. Discussion was held on the existing house, whether it would be used as an office or caretaker quarters. Mr. Attridge stated that he would like to sign an agreement on condition number 7 and 8 to provide improvements at a future date. Chairman Steed stated that this would be an agreement attached to the Deed 0 f Trus t. Moti on by Commi ss ioner Domi nguez to approve Ga rage/Storage Room at 407 North Riley with staff recommendations and on condition number 7 and 8 an agreement to provide improvements at a future date be attached to the Deed of Trust, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: 1 . All items depicted on plot plan shall be provided as indicated, unless otherwise modified by the Design Review Board. 2. Applicant to plant two (2) 15 gallon trees on site. (Trees should be selected from the list of indigenous trees, on file in the Planning De pa rtmen t . Minutes of Design Review Board October 18, 1983 Page 3 GARAGE/STORAGE ROOM - 407 NORTH RILEY - A.A. ATTRIDGE CONTINUED ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 3. Dedicate additional right-of-way to provide for 10 foot wide one- half alley width. Provide title report and deed for dedication. It is expected that the existing alley is 15 feet wide and 2.5 feet dedication is needed on each side. - 4. Dedicate underground water ri ghts to the City. 5. Agree to participate in a Lighting and Landscaping District. 6. Comply with the County Fire Department requirement regarding fire protection. 7. Pay applicable Capital Improvement fees. An agreement to provide improvements at a future date to be attached to the Deed of Trust. 8. Provision must be made for complying with Ordinance 572, off-site improvement requirements along the 150 foot alley frontage and in the 120 foot Riley Street frontage. These improvements include curb, gutter, sidewalk, paving, 1ighting,drainage. An agreement to provide improvements at a future date to be attached to the Deed of Trus t. There being no further business, the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board adjourned at 9:24 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0. -- Approved, Whit Steed Chairman Respectfully sub CfdL~ Linda Grindstaff Planning Commission Secretary - - -- - MINUTES OF HELD ON THE 1ST. LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION DAY OF NOVEMBER 1983 THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:30 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Saathoff. ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner Washburn, and Commissioner Barnhart. Chairman Steed was absent. Also present were Assistant to City Manager, Mike Norton, and City Engineer, Norm Rubel. Being as Chairman Steed was absent, Commissioner Dominguez conducted the meeting. MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve minutes of October 18, 1983, as submitted, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 4-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1 . Zone Change 82-9 - Buron A. Murray - Staff presented proposal for a zone change pre-zoning 12.32 acres presently in the County (south of and adjacent to the southern city limits, west of Stoneman Street, south of Como Street), to SP (Specific Plan District). This pre-zoning would enable the applicant to obtain specific plan zoning for his property in the County and meet LAFCO's pre-zoning requirements for the Rome Hill Annexation application. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:35 P.M. Asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. Fred Crowe, spoke in favor and gave informative summary of background on the pre-annexation zone change for the benefit of the public. Mr. Crowe, stated that he would be happy to answer any questions the Commission or public might have on this project. Mr. Buron A. Murray spoke in favor of this project. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. The following people spoke in opposition: Mr. Bruce Barnes; Mr. Tom Passon; Mr. Kenny Staller; Mr. Bob Crewe; Mr. Miller; Mr. R.V. Cooley; and Mr. Schuman. There being no one else present wishing to speak in opposition, the public hearing was closed at 7:53 P.M. Discussion was held on condition number 1 (pre-annexation zone change to Alter- native A). Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Zone Change 82-9 with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 1. Pre-Annexation Zone Change to Alternative A, Conditional (SP) Specific Plan Zone. 2. A finding of conformance to the General Plan. 3. No significant impact upon the environment. 4. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. 2. Conditional Use Permit 83-12 - British Sports Hovercraft - Staff presented pro- posal for a conditional use permit to establish hovercraft operation for re- search, development, testing, repair and service, to be located on the west side of Corydon Road, approximately 1,500 feet south of Cereal Street. Chairman opened the public hearing at 8:10 P.M. Asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. Raymond Kemp, Chairman of British Sports Hovercraft, spoke in favor of the project and stated he would like to address the concern on noise, stating that additionally to the documentation he presented, noise tests have been carried out by State Park people on this lake with our craft and they are rated within the standard lake limit of nois~ that are currently being used. For those technically minded, the noise Db level at 50 feet is less than 78 decibels. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chair- man asked for those who opposed. Mr. Don Burnell, spoke in opposition stating concern over the noise level, dust problem and protection for wildlife (it was Minutes of Planning Commission November 1, 1983 Page 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-12 - BRITISH SPORTS HOVERCRAFT CONTINUED questioned as to whether there was a wildlife sanctuary around this location) . Richard and Joann Johnston, the property owners, requested permission to speak on the Conditional Use Permit regarding the conditions. Mr. and Mrs. Johnston asked how conditions for capital improvement, paying public safety fees and other various conditions could be applied to a project in which the applicant does not own the property? There being no one else present wishing to speak in opposition, the public hearing was closed at 8:23 P.M. Discussion was held on the conditions applied to the application; noise level; dust control; type of operation at site (research, development, testing and repair); protection for wildlife; and where testing site would be limited to. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to continue Conditional Use Permit 83-12 to the November 15, 1983 meeting, so that the applicant, property owner, and staff can meet and clarify the conditions, to look for problems with the General Plan i.e., the conformance/non-conformance specifically with the Environmental Management Section, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 - BUSINESS ITEMS None COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT Assistant to City Manager, Mike Norton, stated that he had no formal report from the Community Development Director, however, he had a couple of informational items. -- Mr. Norton, introduced Mrs. Marianne McWilliams, as the new Associate Planner for the Ci ty. The Planning Department has received from the Riverside County Planning Depart- ment a copy of Parcel Map 19714 for review. Mr. Norton, asked if the Commission would like to comment on this proposal. The Commission had no comments other than the location of the project. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Commissioner Barnhart - Talking to the City Engineer trying to get one little thing situated, but I have nothing to report. Commissioner Washburn - I attended the all day seminar at UCR, which was put on by UCR Extension. Topics included General Plan, Subdivision Map Act, responsibility of City and City Staff, responsibility of applicant. This was very informative, and a little bit of wisdom I can throw out is, the applicant submits a map and the applicant does not get a response within so many days, or any action whatsoever, then that map is deemed approved. So the responsibility to act is on staff. as well as the offi ci a 1 s 0 f Counci 1 or Pl anni ng Commi ss ioners. I wi 11 probabl y put something together. and pass out at the next meeting. Commissioner Saathoff - I attended the League of Cities Conference. Some of the items we discussed were overview of laws effecting cities, city officials, conflict of interest, disclosure, and the Brown Act. We had a business session and one of the items was election of officials. I recommended three people from the Planning Commission, myself was not included, as an officer for next year. We discussed computers in Planning. Also there was a good session on infra-structure, design standards, techniques for financing, developing contingency regarding infra-structure, which was very enlightening, which many cities shoul d do and the City of Lake Elsinore bei'ng one of tnem. Maintaining control of sphere of influence, regarding LAFCO, city .... Minutes of Planning Commission November 1, 1983 Page 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONTINUED ~ authority regarding second units which are becoming more and more dominant, surviving small cities special taxes, financing innovations that they discussed. Very interesting discussion on promoting and demoting tourisn. These are some of the items discussed at that meeting. I will be happy to discuss these items with anyone so inclined. Commissioner Dominguez - I have nothing to report, but I would like to mention the City is doing a good job with the lake. Chairman Steed - absent Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 ,.--. MI NUTES 0 F HELD ON THE 1ST. MINUTE ACTION LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DAY OF NOVEMBER 1983 Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve minutes of October 18, 1983, as submitted, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 BUSINESS ITEMS - None There being no further business, the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board adjourned at 8:57 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 4-0 Approved, Fred Domi nguez Acting Chairman - Respectfully submitted, c:~~ Linda Gri nds ta ff Planning Commission S ec reta ry - MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 1983 -. THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7: 40 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by City Manager Robert Trevino. ROLL CALL found Commission Saathoff, Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart and Chairman Steetd Also present were City Manager, Robert Trevino, City Attorney, John Porter, Assistant to the City Manager, Michael Norton, City Engineer, Norm Rubel, City Planner James W. Corcoran, and Assistant Planner, Howard Fields. MINUTE ACT! ON Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve minutes of November 1, 1983, as sub- mitted, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Conditional Use Permit 83-2 - British Sports Hovercraft - Staff requested this item be continued to the meeting of December 6, 1983. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to continue Conditional Use Permit 83-12 to the meeting of December 6, 1983, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 -. 2. General Plan Amendmen~ 83-1 ~ Butterfield Development Corporation, c/o FORMA (Ramsgate I and II) - City Manager Robert Trevino presented this proposal for (1) redesignating the 82 acres of Annexation #31 (Ramsgate II) from Very Low Residential to Specific Plan Community, and (2) redesignating the density for the entire 1,190 acre Ramsgate Specific Plan Area from 2.0 d.u./acre to 2.5 d.u./acre, which acreage is located north of Interstate 15 and east of Highway 74. He listed several environmental impacts identified by the Envir- onmental Impact Report which would be magnified by the increase in develop- ment intensity but stated these impacts represent the normal impacts asso- ciated with development. He further stated it is staff's opinion that the Ramsgate Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report justify an increase of one-half unit per acre in develo~ent intensity. The Implementation Program l.l.a.ll. of the General Plan Land Use Element provides criteria for granting a "density bonus" for imaginative development, the preservation and enhancement of public resources and/or provision of public facilities. The Ramsgate Specific Plan represents the most well designed and conceived resi- dential project in Lake Elsinore's history and staff recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 83-1 and adoption of Resolution 83-4. The Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:48 p.m., asking for those pre- sent who wished to speak in favor of General Plan Amendment 83-1. Gary Wayne, residing at 30650 Dryden Street, Lake Elsinore, and President of Butterfield Development Corporation, stated he wished to introduce Dan Salceda, their Project Manager of the Ramsgate Project, who will clarify a few items the City Manager mentioned and highlight a few points of the Specific Plan, but also he wanted to say it was a pleasure for his people to work with City staff on this Project - they have been most cooperative, not only in their positive remarks but also in their negative remarks. They have been very constructive and agreeable to working out solutions with them rather than just criticizing. He then introduced Dan Salceda. Dan Salceda of Butterfield Development Corporation stated he would be very brief because the City Manager's summary was quite comprehensive. He wanted to stress their request for 2.5 d.u./acre is only arrived at after all the hydrology, engineering, geology, marketing data was in. He stressed the marketing aspect because what they are looking at is a market place for first-time home buyers, for retirees, for, basically, people who can afford first-time dwellings yet live within the confines of a Planned Community. Minutes of Planning Commission November 15, 1983 Page 2 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83-1 - BUTTERFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (CONT'D) Seventy (70) percent of the Project is going to be Open Space, only twenty (20) percent of the units will be attached and equally as important is the fact that they are not shrinking any of the property that will allow for employment -- that is the industrial/commercial part of Ramsgate. He then said he would be happy to answer any questions the Commission might have. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those present wishing to speak in opposition. There being no one present wishing to speak in opposition, the public hearing was closed at 7:52 p.m. Discussion was held on density and the point was made that the General Plan Land Use Zoning Designation given to the Ramsgate Community Development area is Specific Plan with 2.0 d.u./acre and this General Plan Amendment is for an increase of density to 2.5 d.u./acre. A question was asked of the City Engineer regarding the five (5) to ten (10) percent possi- ble increase of drainage in Wasson Canyon. The main concern is the mitiga- tion measures maintained to help direct that flow within the Canyon. The Wasson Canyon water course is the City's responsibility but if it is impacted because of the development, then there is a shared responsibility. The City Manager replied that this would be a good point to take up when the tract maps are filed. At that time, the Commission can direct the City Engineer to pay special attention to the drainage as it affects the Wasson Canyon water course. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve General Plan Amendment 83-1 and adopt Resolution No. 83-4, entitled as follows, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 I ~ RESOLUTION NO. 83-4 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83-1. - 3. General Plan Amendment 83-2 - Lupe Uniquez - City Planner James W. Corcoran, presented this proposal to redesignate 6.19 acres, located on the northeast side of Flint Street, one-half mile southeast of Main Street and north of Interstate 15, from Very Low Density Residential (1 d.u./2 acres) to High Density Residential (12.1 to 20 d.u./acre - Condominiums or 12.1 to 32 d.u./ acre - Apartments). The intent of the applicant is to develop the subject property into sixty (60) condominium units. This property is characterized by broad ridges and valleys trending in a southerly direction with a maximum natural ground slope of 25 percent. There is sparce growth of bush through- out. The area is sensitive to rupture lurching and flooding. The topography and physical situation of the site proposed for change does not present itself for high density potential. The topography places some building constraints on any development and, equally, the lack of infrastructure will place miti- gation conditions on any development. A small cluster of high density devel- opemnt, surrounded by low density development would be incompatible to the surrounding land use. In effect, spot zoning would be the result. Very Low Density Residential is established as the dominant use. Staff recommends denial of General Plan Amendment 83-2. The Chairman opened the public hearing at 8:05 p.m., asking for those present who wished to speak in favor of General Plan Amendment 83-2. Dick Murphy, residing at 29362 Swan, Lake Elsinore, stated he felt the proposed develop- ment was not out of line with good planning since around the total area is designated Specific Plan. Possibly he hadn't worked closely enough with staff on this proposal to bring a true picture of it. The 25 percent slopes - it is a little bit hilly and it is not condusive to flooding - no major drain- offs. There is a valley that can take care of the streets with proper plan- ning. They intended to comply with all the ordinances that apply in order to make this one of the better developments. These are not just apartments they would be building - they were to be homes. Lake Elsinore does not have any of this type of housing at this time. It is his contention that this proposal should be zoned Specific Plan. Let them work with the administra- tion to work out a solution for a proper and a better development for the City. It's quite possible they haven't done their homework up to the present to prove their point to the staff. So, at this time, he asked to pull - Minutes of Planning Commission November 15, 1983 Page 3 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83-2 - LUPE UNIQUEZ - CONTINUED. - General Plan Amendment 83-2 from the Planning Commission, work closer with staff and hope they can negotiate a better arrangement than they have here tonight. The Chairman asked Mr. Murphy if he was the applicant and if he was asking that this be pulled out of the public hearing. Mr. Murphy replied "Yes, for further study." The Chairman asked the City Attorney, John Porter, if there would be any problem with the applicant's request to pull General Plan Amendment 83-2 from the public hearing in order for him to have further conversation with staff and perhaps work out something easier. Should that be in writing? The City Attorney said it would be better if it were in writing, but the applicant should be aware that this might put him off- track if his Amendment is not ready to come back by the time the City Council takes action on this group of General Plan Amendments. Other than that, if he will put it in writing, it will present no problem. Dick Murphy asked what he meant by "off-track." The City Attorney replied that the City Council can make three (3) changes a year and, if this one isn't ready to go when the rest of them are, it may have to wait until the next date. The Chairman said since the Planning Commission couldn't act on this matter as far as denial or approval is concerned, it wouldn't be able to go before the City Council and, therefore, would have to wait for the next date for General Plan Amendments. The City Attorney said amending General Plan Amendment 83-2 would require another public hearing. He sug- gested to Mr. Murphy that he write the Planning Commission a letter request- ing withdrawal of General Plan Amendment 83-2 from consideration, indicating that he intends to review the matter, perhaps come back with an amended application, and that he understands that it may not be able to be pro- cessed with this group of Amendments and will have to go with the next group of Amendments. Mr. Murphy agreed to the City Attorney's suggestion. ~ The Chairman stated they would complete the public hearing on General Plan Amendment 83-2 with the recommendation to hear this at the next scheduled General Plan Amendment hearing date in 1984. The Chairman then asked if any- one else wished to speak in favor or opposition to General Plan Amendment 83-2. Receiving no response, the public hearing was closed at 8:12 p.m. Motion by Commissioner Washburn that General Plan Amendment 83-2 be with- drawn from consideration per applicant's request and that applicant shall submit a letter requesting said withdrawal of General Plan Amendment 83-2 from consideration for an amendment to the General Plan, second by Commis- sioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 4. General Plan Amendment 83-3 - Darwin B. Maxon, c/o Kevin Jefferies - Assistant to the City Manager, Michael Norton, presented this proposal to redesignate 7.72 acres, located on the north side of Grand Avenue, approximately 650 feet northwest of the Grand Avenue-Gretega Highway intersection, from Tourist Commercial to Low Density Residential/Commercial. The General Plan defines Tourist Commercial as providing for commercial activities intended to create and enhance areas principally devoted to the provision of recrea- tional services and Low Density Residential as 0 - 6.0 d.u/acre. In 1978, the City Council approved Tentative Tract Map 11469. The applicant com- pleted a majority of the off-site improvements but the Tentative Tract Map was never finaled and recorded. Earlier this year, applicant updated his Tentative Tract Map and submitted it as Tentative Tract Map 19561. The intent of the applicant is to construct 28 residential units and two (2) commercial structures in association with Tentative Tract Map 19561. Appli- cant agreed to place said Map on "Hold" pending the decision on subject General Plan Amendment. This General Plan Amendment to residential would not be compatible with surrounding land use to the west, or the lake to the north which varies greatly in surface elevations. Within the immediate area of the site, north of Grand Avenue is Tourist Commercial, Flood Plain and Flood Way and the Old Military Academy Specific Plan Area. Ordinance No. 711 restricts development around the perimeter of the lake below 1270 feet elevation until flood control improvements render it unnecessary. The General Plan does not encourage residential development around the perimeter of the lake. One concern staff has with the subject Map, as submitted, is that the following proposed lots are at or below 1270 feet M.S.L.: #1, #2, Minutes of Planning Commission November 15, 1983 Page 4 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83-3 - DARWIN B. MAXON, C/O KEVIN JEFFERIES - CONTINUED. #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21 and #22. Staff recommends denial of General Plan Amendment 83-3. Chairman Steed said he had a question regarding the responsibility for filing a Final Tract Map for recordation -- was it the City's responsibility or the applicant's? The City Engineer replied that it was the applicant's responsi- bili ty . Chairman opened the public hearing at 8:22 p.m., asking for those present who wished to speak in favor of General Plan Amendment 83-3. Kevin Jefferies, residing at 17682 Grand Avenue, Lake Elsinore, stated he would like to pass out what he believes are the facts regarding the recommendations in staff's report to the Planning Commission. He then passed out his own Fact Sheet to the Commissioners, City Attorney, City Engineer and Assistant to the City Manager which listed five (5) items and a summary in answer to certain state- ments contained in the staff report to the Planning Commission on subject General Plan Amendment. He said if they read the Fact Sheet they will find that what was submitted to them tonight by staff does not necessarily rep- resent total facts. He then asked everyone to read the Fact Sheet before he answered anymore questions. After a few moments, Mr. Jefferies said one thing he would like to point out, and contained on his Fact Sheet, is that you are not emphasizing that to the east the residential development he is talking about is also in Commercial Tourism. While it's true they are not subdividing, we are talking about a double standard. On one hand, you are allowing someone to build residential homes in Commercial Tourism. On the other hand, 95 feet away you are saying "You can't do that." We have a half million dollars invested in improvements the City authorized, inspected and approved. What we didn't have was the Final. Why that happened -- it was totally up to the owner's decision. He just felt there was no reason to finalize it at that time because he wasn't going to develop. Unfortu- nately, he didn't know it but the City was pushing through a new General Plan and it went through and he was never aware of it. We didn't realize the impact of Commercial Tourism until this year. We aren't developers so we don't keep an eye on that kind of stuff. The hydrants, the water supply, the gas, the electricity, the cable, the street lights, everything is on and energized and the Tract is set and ready to go. It needs a few side- walks replaced, it needs the sewer pump station put in, it needs to be re-shot as far as the level of the bottom three (3) lots, which are the only lots, they believe, that are not above 1270 feet M.S.L., but they believe they are at 1269 feet M.S.L. They have a lot below the bottom lot on the subdivision map that is all D.G. filled that they can bring up from below the Tract to help raise those lots. That will be in compliance with City filling things as far as raising lots. The Chairman asked if there were any other persons present wishing to speak in favor of this General Plan Amendment. Receiving no reply, he asked if there was anyone present wishing to speak in opposition. Receiving no response, the public hearing was closed at 8:46 p.m. Discussion was held on construction of MOsbacher's three (3) family homes on his large lot, possible loss of some Tourist Commercial zoned land, concern with stated ordinances dealing with flooding and the lots close to the lake, obscuring the lake from view, obtaining "hold harmless" agreements to protect future buyers of homes on lower lots, "spot zoning," recommending General Plan Amendment of Land Use Element from Tourist Commercial to Specific Plan for this site. The General Plan zoning definition of Specific Plan was read out loud to give applicant a better understanding of said zoning designa- tion. It was explained that all categories are permitted in the Specific Plan Area. The City Attorney was asked if there would be any problem in changing the requested General Plan Amendment of Land Use Element from Tourist Commercial to Specific Plan instead of to Low Density Residential/ Commercial. He replied it would probably be staff's fall-back recommenda- tion because of the maximum control the City would have over the development. It was the consensus of the Commission that their reason for recommending the change from Tourist Commercial to Specific Plan was because the site is an existing subdivision with infrastructure already in. Motion by Commis- sioner Barnhart to approve General Plan Amendment 83-3, amending it to read "General Plan Amendment of Land Use Element from Tourist Commercial to - - - Minutes of Planning Commission November 15, 1983 Page 5 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83-3 - DARWIN B. MAXON, C/O KEVIN JEFFERIES - CONTINUED. - Specific Plan Area," (Alternative A or B to be determined by applicant and staff), and adoption of Resolution 83-5 with amended verbiage to conform with the General Plan Amendment 83-3, entitled as follows, second by Commis- sioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 RESOLUTION NO. 83-5 A RESOLUTION OF TIlE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TIlE CI'lY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83-3. 5. General Plan Amendment 83-4 - City of Lake Elsinore - The City Engineer, Norm Rubel, informed the Commission that in his presentation General Plan Amend- ment 83-4 would be presented in two (2) steps, General Plan Amendment 83-4(a) and General Plan Amendment 83-4(b). General Plan Amendment 83-4(a) proposes to amend the Circulation Element of the General Plan by changing vehicular traffic corridor classifications due to certain constraints, and changed existing conditions. The purpose is to minimize impacts on existing commercial, residential and industrial develop- ment. There is no significant impact on the environment. The proposed changes will lessen the impacts upon the environment because of proposed reduced widths for some major streets. The following list identifies the proposed corridor classifications and limits: - Lakeshore Drive - Main Street to Riverside Drive from (88' -64') to (80'-64') Lakeshore Drive Riverside Drive to Robb Road from (110' -86') to (100'-76') Pottery Street Casino Drive from Chaney Street to Malaga Road (100' -76') to (80'-64') Railroad Canyon Road 'from Casino Drive to Mission Trail from (l00''':'76') (110'-86') Collier Avenue Riverside Drive Central Avenue to Riverside Drive from (66'-62') to (100'~76') Collier Avenue to Gunnerson (Strickland Avenue) from (66'-62') to (100'-76') The City Engineer pointed out on a display map the above proposed corridor classifications and limits. The City Engineer feels that the proposed changes of the Circulation Element of the General Plan would be justified and warranted and recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 83-4 (a) . General Plan Admentment 83-4(b) proposes to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan by a revision to Special Purpose Designation Standard No. (17), presently entitled "County Club Heights Planned District" and now to be entitled" (17) Planned District which includes the Three Country Club Heights Locations with Some Adjacent Areas." He referred to Pages LU25 and LU26 and Figures LUl, LU2 and LU3 attached to his report to the Commission, and pointed out subject revision. The revision is intended to emphasize more the need to be innovative and flexible in applying grading, roadway and development standards because of the extreme variations in the topography. The prohibition for sewer extension is proposed to be eliminated. The City Engineer stated General Plan Amendment 83-4(b) will have no significant impact on the environment and is necessary to protect substantial property rights. He feels the Amendment is justified and warranted and recommended approval of General Plan Amendment 83-4(b) and the adoption of Resolution No. 83-6 . The Chairman asked if the property owners in the area of the Land Use revision had been notified. The City Attorney said the State law provides that one (1) notice of hearing be published, which has been done, and the law also provides that the City may, if it desires, give additional notice but there is no requirement that the City give additional notice. The Chairman opened the public hearing at 8:52 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak in favor of General Plan Amendment 83-4(a) and (b) and Resolution Minutes of Planning Commission November 15, 1983 Page 6 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83-4 - CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - CONTINUED No. 83-6. William S. Buck asked if the revision would affect some property where he wants to build and, after pointing out the area on the display map, was told "no." Fred Crowe of Butterfield Surveys said the Country Club Heights areas are very difficult to develop and he thinks this Amendment will make the development easier and maybe enhance and get some development that has been impossible up until now. The Chairman asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Receiving no reply, the public hearing was closed at 8:55 p.m. Discussion brought out that a piece of stretch road that is Chaney Street from Lakeshore Drive to Flint Street has been overlooked. It should be downgraded. Maybe the City Engineer could look into that in the near future. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve General Plan Amend- ment 83-4(a) (b) and adoption of Resolution No. 83-5, entitled as follows, second by Commissioner Washburn. RESOLUTION NO. 83-6 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CI'lY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83-4(a) AND (b). 6. General Plan Amendment 83-5 - William S. Buck - Assistant Planner Howard Fields presented this proposal to redesignate 4.96 acres, located at the southwest intersection of Lincoln and Flannery Streets, from Medium Density Residential (6.1 to 12.0 d.u./acre) to High Density Residential (12.1 to 32 d.u./acre). The applicant started acquiring this R...3,'zoned property in 1981 with the understanding the zoning would remain R-3 (Multiple-Family Residence). On December 14, 1982, the City Council adopted a new General Plan and Land Use Zoning Designations. The General Plan Zoning Designation for this site is Medium Density which allows a density level of 6.1 to 12.0 d.u./acre. The current zoning of R-3 allows approximately 20 to 21 units per acre. The applicant submitted his plans to construct a 104-unit apart- ment complex but was denied due to the high density of his project. The zoning on all projects submitted to the City must now conform to the General Plan. On October 11, 1983, the City Council directed applicant's multi- unit apartment complex project be held over for two (2) weeks to enable staff to meet with applicant and attempt to resolve the problem. Staff met with the City Attorney and then with Mr. Buck and the final outcome was that Mr. Buck would apply for a General Plan Amendment. Mr. Buck agreed to this alternative and filed the subject General Plan Amendment to change the den- sity of his property from Medium Density Residential (6.1 to 12.0 d.u./acre) to High Density Residential (12.1 to 32 d.u./acre), thus allowing for 2lr units per acre, as Mr. Buck originally requested. After a field survey, staff determined that the higher density designation for subject property is compatible with surrounding land usage and would be appropriate. This action would achieve greater urbanization and utilization of the land as reflected in the General Plan. Specifically, the Amendment would create a buffer zone between proposed commercial development on Riverside Drive and existing single-family residents adjacent to subject property. The Environmental Assessment outlines some concerns that could occur from applicant's proposed project but these impacts could be mitigated by conditions imposed upon formal submittal of the proposed project. The Planning staff has examined the positive benefits to be derived from General Plan Amendment 83-5 and concludes that the benefits outweigh the negative environmental effects. Staff recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 83-5 and adoption of Resolution No. 83-7. The Chairman opened the public hearing at 9 :03 p.m., asking if anyone wished to speak in favor of this Amendment. William S. Buck, applicant for this Amendment, stated that basically he concurred with staff's report and he was there to answer any questions. Fred Crowe, Butterfield Surveys, said he was in favor but had one concern and that was the area between the applicant's property and the commercial property. Mr. Buck stated there is no area between the two properties as his property is right on Flannery Street directly across from the commercial property. The Chairman asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition to General Plan Amendment 83-5. Receiving no response, the public hearing was closed at 9:06 p.m. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve General Plan Amendment 83-5 and adoption of Resolution No. 83-7, entitled as follows, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 - - - Minutes of Planning Commission November 15, 1983 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 83-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83-5. - BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Lot Line Adjustment 83-12 - Fausto Grano - City Engineer Norm Rubel presented proposal for a Lot Line Adjustment at the southwesterly corner of Roger Street, westerly of Avenue 7. The applicant is requesting a Lot Line Adjust- ment to transfer the easterly lot line of Lot 57 thirty (30) feet westerly to Lot 56. If approved the Lot Line Adjustment will create two (2) lots. The purpose of the Lot Line Adjustment is to create more suitable buildable lots. The applicant is in compliance to existing R-1 (Single-Family Residence) zoning (the R-l Zoning District requires a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet and a minimum frontage of 50 feet). Staff feels that the proposed Lot Line Adjustment will resul~ in a more rational lot layout and will facilitate development. The City Engineer advised the Commission that the Engineering Department is only recommending approval of Conditions #11 and #15 as the Engineering conditions for approval for this Lot Line Adjustment. The remain- der of the Engineering Department conditions have already been applied against applicant's single-family residence. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Lot Line Adjustment 83-12 subject to the following conditions as amended by the City Engineer, second by Commissioner Saathoff. ' Approved 5-0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 1. City Engineer verification of legal description as accurate. - 2. Issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 3. (#11) Work with City to include this property in a Landscaping and Lighting District. 4. (#15) Applicant to dedicate water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore. 2. Lot Line Adjustment 83-15 (Ref: T.M. 15382) - Fred Crowe - (Walk-On Item) - City Manager, Robert Trevino, made the presentation for applicant's Lot Line Adjustment application. He stated Mr. Crowe and Mr. Nelson came in very late. They had a problem with lot lines and the problem being that they wanted to go into escrow and the set backs didn't quite match. Applicant has sub- mitted a corrected map and he respectfully requests that Lot Lines be adjusted on Parcels 28, 29 and 17. It merely means a shifting of the Lot Line on Parcel 28 two and one-half (2~) feet and on Parcel 29 1.3 feet and on Parcel 17 from 0 feet to roughly 2.3 feet, all going at an angle. These are neces- sary just for recordation. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Lot Line Adjustment 83-15, second Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 CCMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT None PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Commissioner Saathoff None Commissioner Dominguez - None Commissioner Washburn None Commissioner Barnhart Asked what was going to be done with that burned-out shell that is still sitting up there on Graham. The City Manager replied that he had just signed the letter for Abatement proceedings this afternoon. Minutes of Planning Commission November 15, 1983 Pqe8 The City Attorney said that since one of the Resolutions hadn't been adopted the numbering had been thrown off. By consensus of the Commissioners, approval to re-number the Resolutions adopted at this meeting was given, thereby placing them in numerical order. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 .... ~ ... .... MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HElD ON THE 15 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 1983 - MINUTE ACTION The minutes of the November 1, 1983, meeting were not considered at this time and, therefore, not approved. BUSINESS ITEMS None There being no further business, the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board adjourned at 9:15 p.m. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved, - Whi t Steed Chairman Respectfully submitted, fkL -t~~ Ruth Edwards Acting Secretary Planning Commission ~ MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 6TH. DAY OF DECEMBER 1983 THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:30 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Commissioner Washburn. ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart and Chairman Steed. Also present were City Planner, Jim Corcoran, and City Engineer, Norm Rubel. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Resolution Number 83-8 (Supplemental Resolution for General Plan Amendment 83-3, Darwin Maxson). This Supplemental Resolution establishes density at 4.0 dwelling units per acre for General Plan Amendment 83-3. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to adopt Resolution Number 83-8, entitled as follows, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 RESOLUTION NO. 83-8 A SUPPLEMENTAL RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83-3. MI NUTE ACT! ON - Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve minutes of November 15, 1983, as submitted, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Conditional Use Permit 83-12 - British Sports Hovercraft - Staff presented proposal for a Conditional Use Permit to establish hovercraft operation for research, development, testing, repair and service on the west side of Corydon Road, ap- proximately 1,500 feet south of Cereal Street. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:39 p.m., asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of Conditional Use Permit 83-12. Mr. Raymond Kemp, applicant, stated he would like to address the concerns regarding wildlife in the area. Mr. Kemp informed the Commission that the State Director of Environment attended the Hovercraft Park and observed the hoverpark operation, and that his comments after- wards, from his test and his knowledge of wildlife, and from his observation of what happened there, were that there is no problem with wildlife. Mr. Kemp stated there were several meetings with staff and himself regarding this application, and at some of those meetings one of the factors that came up was that this Conditional Use Permit Appl ication contains the phrase "research and development of hovercraft". Mr. Kemp stated, to clarify the confusion on the phrase, he (his company) would be willing to drop the phrase "research and develop- ment". Mr. Kemp questioned conditions 13 through 20, stating he had no ability to respond, no responsibility to respond, in fact no authority to respond, and the property owner is present and I am sure that he would like to give an updated response on these conditions. Mr. Kemp stated that he would be here to answer any questions and/or give data, as opposed to wild opinion. Chairman asked if there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor of the project. Mr. Dick Johnston, property owner, questioned conditions 13 through 30, stating that the meetings with staff were not productive and conditions 14 through 30 are either large dollar values or unknown dollar values. Mr. Johnston stated that he had no plans to spend that kind of money until the lake is stablized Minutes of Planning Commission December 6, 1983 Pa ge 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-12 - BRITISH SPORTS HOVERCRAFT CONTINUED permanently. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition, the public hearing was closed at 7:51 p.m. - Discussion was held on adding corridor for operation as condition number 3.a.; why a Conditional Use Permit was required for this operation; Chairman commented on the requested useage coming before them "after the fact"; concern for wild- life nesting ground; dust and noise control levels; neighborhood residences in the area; and conditions 13 through 30 were each discussed; conditions 14,15,16, 22,23,24,and 27 recommended to be del eted. Motion by Commi ss ioner Saatho ff to approve Conditional Use Permit 83-12 with staff recommendations as amended, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: 1. Applicant to provide adequate on-site parking (Parking area to be D.G.). 2. Follow all requirements of the County Health Department. 3. All operations shall occur between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and Dusk. a) Planning staff to outline a corridor and/or an area in which the hovercraft are to be operated in order to protect the residential neighborhood along Corydon Road from noise and dust conflicts. 4. Applicant to meet all requirements of the State Park Area Manager. 5. Applicant to provide dust control measures for the hovercraft vehicles. 6. Applicant shall be subject to six (6) month reviews. - 7. Applicant shall present proof of insurance prior to issuance of a business license. 8. All signs shall be approved by the Planning Division. 9. Applicant to provide enclosed trash area. 10. Fi ndi ng of conformance to the General Pl an. 11. Fi ndi ng of no si gni fi cant impact upon the envi ronment. 12. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 13. On Corydon Road a 50 foot one-half street right-of-way exists which is in conformance with the General Plan. 14. 1~~t~ll/t~f~/~~~/~~tt~f/$~/f~~t/ff~~/t~~t~f7jn~/~n/~~fi~~~/~~A~/. DELETED. - 15. t~nttfptt/~t~~~~f~/~/f~~t/~j~~W~)~/~~~~t~nt/t~/tpf~/~~/t~fi~~n/~~~~/. ~~n~tf~tt/~fj*~w~i/~pp~~t~/t~/~jti/~t~n~~f~~~/$~/f~~t/wj~~/' DELETED. 16. ~~n~tf~tt/Atp~~7t/p~*jn~/t~/~jti/~t~n~~f~~/ff~~/t~nt~fljn~/t~/tpf~/7jn~ ~~/~~fi~~~/~~~~/tltJ/./f/~}/,//~~~~/p~*jn~/~tjtt~/~n/~~fi~~n/~~~~/.//7~~t~ ~~~t/t~~w/t~~t/~tjttjn~/p~*jn~/jt/t~/tjti/~t~n~~f~t/~n~/wjl7/tppp~ft/t~~ tf~ffjt/jn~~t/./ DELETED. 17. Provide street lighting. Minutes of Planning Commission December 6, 1983 Pa ge 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-12 - BRITISH SPORTS HOVERCRAFT CONTINUED 18. Cooperate with City in establishing a Landscaping and Lighting District. 19. Provide sanitary sewer service as approved by the City, the County Health Department and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Provide letter agreeing to participate in a regional sewage collection, treatment and disposal system. 20. Provide to City a water availability letter from Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (E.V.M.W.D.). 21. Provide a written assurance that County Fire Department requirements have been compl i ed with for Fi re Protection and Fi re Hydrant locations. 22. Pt~*j~~/tt~ffjt/~jnn~/~n~/~~t~j~n~/./ DELETED. 23. P7~~~/~~~/i~~tjfj~~tj~~i/f~t/~~~ljt/j~pt~*~~~nti/~~~11/~~/pt~pJt~~/~i/_ ~j*jl/gnnjn~~t/./ DELETED. 24. Pt~*j~~/itt~~t/tt~~i/~i/t~~~jt~~/~i/~jti/. DELETED. 25. Pay Public Safety fees per Resolution No. 83-4. 26. Applicant to provide the City with a Recorded Access Agreement through the existing properties between this parcel and the Lake, for ingress, egress purposes. 27. Pt~*j~~/~t~jn~n~/~tt~pt_nt~/l~tt~t/t~/~jti/. DELETED. 28. Dedicate subsurface water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore. 29. Record notice of hazardous conditions and Hold Harmless Agreement from 100 Year Flood and from overflow of adjacent drainage ditch. 30. Pay Capital Improvement Fees per Ordinance 572 as follows: Street Storm Drainage - Park TOTAL $ 2,056.00 $ 1,370.00 $ 200.00 $ 3,626.00 BUS INESS ITEMS 1. Lot Line Adjustment 83-13 - Elewellyn Overholt (Action Surveys) - Staff presented proposal for a Lot Line Adjustment, which would create 13 parcels, at the north- westerly intersection of Dawes Street and Irwin Drive. Mr. Gabriel Ybarra, of Action Surveys, representing the applicant stated they were in agreement with staff recommendation and conditions as presented. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Lot Line Adjustment 83-13 with staff recommendation, second by Com- missioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 (Commissioner Barnhart excused) PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: 1. City Engineer verification of legal description as accurate. 2. Issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 3. STREETS: A. On Avenue 6 a 25 foot one-half street ri ght-o f-way exi s ts . A thirty-foot wide one-half street is required. Dedicate an additional five-feet of right-of-way. Minutes of Planning Commission December 6, 1983 Page 4 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 83-13 - ELEWELLYN OVERHOLT (ACTION SURVEYS) CONTINUED On the east side of Avenue 6 install concrete curb and gutter 20 feet from street centerline and standard 5 foot wide sidewalk separated from curb. B. On Park Way a thirty-foot one-half street right-of-way exists. No additional right-of-way dedication is re- quired on the south side. On the south side install concrete curb and gutter 18 feet from street centerline to conform to existing and construct standard 5 foot wide sidewalk separated from curb. .... C. On Irwin Drive a fifty-foot street right-of-way exists. No additional right-of-way dedication is required. On the west side install concrete curb and gutter eighteen feet from street centerline and standard five-foot side- walk separated from the curb. D. On Dawes Street a fifty-foot street right-of-way exists. No additional right-of-way is required. On the north side install concrete curb and gutter eighteen feet from street centerline. Construct standard five-foot sidewalk on north side separated from the curb. On the south side construct asphalt paving to 10 feet south of the center- line and install asphalt curb with an extruding machine. 4. Construct asphalt paving to City Standards from centerline to south curb line Dn Park Way; from ten feet south of centerline to the north curb line on Dawes Street; from centerline to west curb line on Irwin Drive; from centerline to east curb line on Avenue 6; (T.I. = 6.5). Some paving exists on Park Way and Avenue 6. Tests must show that the existing pav- ~ ing is to City Standards and will support the traffic index. 5. Install Street Lights. 6. Cooperate with City in establishing a Landscaping and Lighting District. 7. Provide sanitary sewer service as approved by the City, the County Health Department and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Provide letter agreeing to participate in a regional sewage collection, treatment and disposal system. 8. Install domestic waterline in all surrounding streets. Location and size is to be determined by the City Engineer. A water line exists in Avenue 6 and also in Park Way between both Avenue 6 at off-set. 9. Provide written assurance that County Fire Department requirements have been complied with for fire protection and fire hydrant locations. 10. Provide traffic signs and markings. 11. Plans and specifications for public improvements work shall be prepared by applicant's Civil Engineer for approval by City. 12. Provide street trees as required by City. ~ 13. Pay Public Safety fees per Resolution No. 83-4 in the amount of $150.00 per dwelling unit for fire and $250.00 per dwelling unit for police protection. 14. Pay Capital Improvement fees per Ordinance No. 572 in the amount of $500.00 per dwelling unit for water; $.03 per square foot of lot area for streets; $.02 per square foot of lot area for storm drainage; and $.10 per square foot of building area for parks. 15. Dedicate subsurface water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore. 16. Provide City Engineer with Hydrology Study for subject property and surround- Minutes of Planning Commission December 6, 1983 Page 5 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 83-13 - ELEWELLYN OVERHOLT (ACTION SURVEYS) CONTINUED ing properties. Use Riverside County Flood Control Rational Method. 17. Provide City Engineer with Soils Report to include street pavement design. 18. Pay traffic safety mitigation fee in the amount of $ 2,500.00. 19. Pay drainage off-site impact mitigation fee in the amount of $ 2,500.00. 2. Lot Line Adjustment 83-14 - Lawton L. Tabor (ACTION SURVEYS) - Staff presented proposal for a Lot Line Adjustment, which would create 8 parcels, at the north- easterly intersection of Dawes Street and Irwin Drive. Mr. Gabriel Ybarra, of Action Surveys, representing the applicant stated they were in agreement with staff recommendation and conditions as presented. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Lot Line Adjustment 83-14 with staff recommendation, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 4-0 (Commissioner Barnhart excused) PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: 1. City Engineer certification of legal description as accurate. 2. Issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: - 3. STREETS: A. On Park Way a thirty-foot one-half street right-of-way exists. No additional right-of-way dedication is required on the south side. On the north side install concrete curb and gutter 18 feet from the street centerline to conform to existing and construct standard 5 foot wide sidewalk separated from curb. B. On Irwin Drive a fifty-foot street right-of-way exists. No additional right-of-way dedication is required. On the east side install concrete curb and gutter eighteen feet from street centerline and standard five foot sidewalk separated from the curb. C. On Dawes Street a fifty-foot street right-of-way exists. No additional right-of-way is required. On the north side install concrete curb and gutter eighteen feet from street centerline. Construct standard five-foot sidewalk on north side separated from the curb. On the south side construct asphalt paving to 10 feet south of the centerline and install asphalt curb with an extruding machine. - D. On Avenue 7 a thirty-foot one-half street right-of-way exists. No additional right-of-way is required. On the west side install concrete curb and gutter twenty-feet from street centerline and standard five-foot sidewalk separated from the curb. 4. Construct asphalt paving to City Standards from centerline to south curb line on Park Way; from ten feet south of centerline to the north curb line on Dawes Street; from centerline to west curb line on Irwin Drive; and from centerline to west curb line on Avenue 7 (T.I. = 6.5). 5. Install Street Lights. 6. Cooperate with City in establishing a Landscaping and Lighting District. Minutes of Planning Commission December 6, 1983 Page 6 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 83-14 - LAWTON L. TABOR (ACTION SURVEYS) CONTINUED 7. Provide sanitary sewer service as approved by the City, the County Health Department and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Provide letter agreeing to participate in a regional sewage collection, treatment and disposal system. S. Install domestic waterl ine in all surrounding streets. Location and size is to be determined by the City Engineer. - 9. Provide written assurance the County Fire Department requirements have been complied with for fire protection and fire hydrant locations. 10. Provide traffic signs and markings. 11. Plans and specifications for public improvements work shall be prepared by applicant's Civil Engineer for approval by City. 12. Provide street trees as required by City. 13. Pay Public Safety fees per Resolution No. 83-4 in the amount of $150.00 per dwelling unit for fire and $250.00 per dwelling unit for police protection. 14. Pay Capital Improvement fees per Ordinance No. 572 in the amount of $500.00 per dwell i ng unit for water; $ .03 per square foot of lot area for streets; $.02 per square foot of lot area for storm drainage; and $.10 per square foot of building area for parks. 15. Dedicate subsurface water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore. 16. Provide City Engineer with Hydrology Study for subject property and surrounding properties. Use Riverside County Flood Control Rational Method. ... 17. Provide City Engineer with Soils Report to include street pavement design. lS. Pay traffic safety mitigation fee in the amount of $ 2,500.00. 19. Pay drainage off-site impact mitigation fee in the amount of $ 2,500.00. 20. Provide off-site grading necessary to drain storm water run-off to culvert crossing Lakeshore Drive. 3. Retaining Wall - 649 Mill Street - George Alongi - Staff informed the Commission that Mr. Alongi constructed a retaining wall 3 feet into the street right-of- way. The approved plan required the retaining wall to be 9 feet back of the curb line, which is at the right-of-way line. The retaining wall was actually constructed at back of sidewalk or 6 feet back of curb line. Mr. Alongi is requesting to encroach 3 feet into the street right-of-way, staff stated a recommendation from the Commission to the City Council is necessary. Discussion was held on street widths; sidewalk widths; and height of the retaining wall. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to recommend to City Council approval of retain- ing wall at 649 Mill Street, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 ... COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT None PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Commissioner Saathoff - None Minutes of Planning Commission December 6, 1983 Pa ge 7 PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONTINUED Commissioner Dominguez - Requested a copy of the Overlay Ordinance that the Committee has been working on, this is to come back before the Commission and I would like to have it come to us as soon as possible. Fences and walls, I would like to have them come before us. Chairman Steed asked Commissioner Dominguez if he was referring to anything over and above what is required to not have a permit, or problem areas? Commissioner Dominguez stated, he \'/Oul d 1 ike all fences and wall to come before them regardless if a permit is required or not. Commissioner Washburn - There are some things the County is doing on zone changes that fall into the Sphere of Influence that we are not being informed of. Should let the County know that we are very interested in what is taking place within our Sphere of Influence, especially zone changes. Would like the consensus of the Commission to recommend to City Council that a consultant study for the east end of the lake, on general land use planning and future planning, be prepared (much like the one Council did for the airport). A lengthy discussion was then held covering Park and Recreation Study; public hearing to be held by State Park and Recreation in January; in March or April a preliminary report will be submitted by State Park and Recreation to the Bureau of Reclamination on certain engineering considerations as to the lake perimeter which may include significant information that may dictate that the City have a feasibility study performed on the east end of the lake. The Methodist Church on Heald and Main Street is asking that parking for the bus off loading be moved up closer to John's Service Center, as they are finding ~ conflicting uses with the bus there during funerals, weddings, etc. Commissioner Barnhart - When a citation is issued, what is the time limitation? I am referring to the burned down structure on Chestnut (Graham). The citation was supposedly issued two weeks ago, do they have 30 days, 90 days, or what amount of time do they have to remove the debris? Commissioner Barnhart was informed that the time limit could be stretched out for quite some time if the citation is appealed. Chairman Steed - Across from the bank where they are in the progress of building a restaurant, there is an opening in the street, it is barricaded, but it has been open for about two months. I think the City should back fill that hole. Since the resurfacing of Main Street, there is a problem with gravel and dust. He felt the street should be watered down to minimize the dust problem. Commissioner Barnhart in connection with Chairman Steed on Main Street. I under- stand that this is only temporary and that the brick sidewalk, resurfacing and etc. will be done after the rains, like next Spring. City Engineer stated that this was correct. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 .. MINUTES OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HELD ON THE MI NUTE ACTION 6TH. DAY OF DECEMBER 1983 Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve minutes of November 1, 1983 and minutes of November 15, 1983, as submitted, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 .-. BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Commercial Remodel - 31701 Riverside Drive - Art Nelson - Staff presented proposal for a commercial remodel of an existing building to change the architectural theme from contemporary to nautical. Mr. Nelson was present and explained why he chose the nautical theme. Also, Mr. Nelson requested that conditions 4,5,6,7,8, 9,10, 15 and 17 be deferred, stating that adjacent to this property and included on the same parcel, is a pad for approximately 13,000 square feet of combination retail and office space, which would tie in with this theme (Phase II), and re- quire these conditions to be installed with the new building (Phase II). Chair- man stated that these conditions could be deferred with a Letter of Attachment to the Deed of Trust. Mr. Nelson stated that condition number 11 was already complied with as he is connected to the sewer. Discussion was held on roof materials (shake or tile); color scheme; architectural design; landscaping; park- ing; curb alignment; and conditions 4 through 17. Mr. Nelson asked for the consensus of the Board for the roof material to be used. After discussion shake roofing was approved. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Commercial Remodel at 31701 Riverside Drive with staff recommendation, deferrring conditions 4,5,6,7,8,10,15,16 with Letter of Attachment to Deed of Trust, so that the total improvements of Project Phase I have to be tied into Phase II, and it cannot be divided; and on condition number 17, changing the words "street trees" to "provide for landscaping in Phase I", second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 - PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: 1. All items depicted on plot plans shall be provided as indicated on said plot plan. Any changes will necessitate re-submittal. 2. All signs shall be in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and be approved by the Planning Division. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 3. Riverside Drive (State Highway 74): a) Dedicate 20 feet of right-of-way along Riverside Drive frontage. b) Existing right-of-way is 60 feet. c) State wants 100 feet of right-of-way. General Plan calls for 100 feet of right-of-way. 4. Install curb and gutter 38 feet from street centerline to Cal Trans Standards and Specifications along Riverside Drive. Existing curb and gutter does not conform to the General Plan nor State requirements. DEFERRED WITH LETTER OF ATTACHMENT TO THE DEED OF TRUST. 5. Construct 8-foot wide sidewalk on Riverside Drive. Construct two 30- foot driveway approaches to City Standards. Sidewalk and three driveways exist at this time, but do not conform to required standards. DEFERRED WITH LETTER OF ATTACHMENT TO THE DEED OF TRUST. - 6. Construct asphalt paving to City Standards from centerline to curb line on Riverside Drive (T.!. = 8.5). Some paving exists on Riverside Drive. Tests must show that existing paving is to City Standards and will support the traffic index. DEFERRED WITH LETTER OF ATTACHMENT TO THE DEED OF TRUST. Minutes of Design Review Board December 6, 1983 Page 2 COMMERCIAL REMODEL - 31701 RIVERSIDE DRIVE - ART NELSON CONTINUED 7. Provi de City Engi neer with Soil s Report to i ncl ude street des i gn . DEFERRED WITH LETTER OF ATTACHMENT TO THE DEED OF TRUST. 8. Drainage for subject project must be directed to Riverside Drive, and conveyed in an acceptable manner under the sidewalk as approved by the City Engineer. Pay equitable drainage mitigate impact fee in the amount of $ 5,000.00. DEFERRED WITH LETTER OF ATTACHMENT TO THE DEED OF TRUST. 9. Provide street lighting. There are existing power poles along the property frontage on which street lights could be mounted. 10. Plans for off-site work shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer. DEFERRED WITH LETTER OF ATTACHMENT TO THE DEED OF TRUST. 11. Existing sewer facilities are located in Riverside Drive. Applicant to conform to City Standards and Speci fi cations for connection to City Sewer System and pay sewer connection fees. 12. Provide to City a water availability letter from Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (E.V.M.W.D.). 13. Provide written assurance the County Fire Department requirements have been complied with to include fire hydrant locations. 14. Pay Capita 1 Impro vement fees: - Streets S to rm Dra i ns Park $ .03 per square foot of lot area. - $ .02 per square foot of lot area. $ .10 pe r s q ua re foo t 0 f lot a rea. 15. Obtain encroachment permit from Cal-Trans. DEFERRED \HTH LETTER OF ATTACH- MENT TO THE DEED OF TRUST. 16. Provide traffic signs and markings. DEFERRED WITH LETTER OF ATTACHMENT TO THE DEED OF TRUST. 17. Provide for landscaping in Phase 1. 2. Commercial Addition - 31361 Riverside Drive - Steven Anthony (Ronnie's Sandwich Shop) - Staff presented proposal for a commercial addition of 1,247 square feet upper level outdoor patio and conversion of existing 1,302 square feet ground floor outdoor patio into an enclosed game room/video arcade. Discussion was held on access to second deck patio. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Commercial Addition at 31361 Riverside Drive with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 -- 1. All items depicted on plot plan shall be provided as indicated on said plot plan. Any changes will necessitate re-submittal. 2. All signs shall be in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and be approved by the Planning Division. 3. Commercial Project 83-11 - California Property Exchange - Applicant has requested this item be continued to the next scheduled meeting. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to continue Commercial Project 83-11 to the meeting of December 20, 1983, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 ~ Minutes of Design Review Board December 6, 1983 Pa ge 3 4. Single-Family Residence - 16951 Wells Street - William Buck - Staff presented proposal for a single-family residence to be located at 16591 l~ells Street, stating proposal meets all ordinance requirements. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Single-Family Residence at 16591 Wells Street with staff recommendations, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 1. An existing 40-foot right-of-way exists on Wells Avenue. Additional right-of-way dedication for Wells Avenue will not be required per Resolution No. 77-7. - 2. Install curb and gutter to City Standards and specifications sixteen feet from street centerline. Reduce street widths may be allowed if General Plan Amendment 83-4 is adopted. 3. Construct four-foot sidewalk to City Standards and specifications adja- cent to curb on Wells Avenue. Install residential driveway to City Standards and specifications. Sidewalk requirements may be deleted if General Plan Amendment 83-4 is adopted. 4. Construct asphalt paving to City Standards and specifications from centerline to curb line (T.I. = 6.0). 5. Provide soils report to include street design to City Engineer. 6. Install street light to City specifications. 7. Plans for off-site work shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer. 8. Provide sanitary sewer service as approved by the City, the County Health Department and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. 9-. Provide to the City a water availability letter. 10. Provide written assurance the County Fire Department requirements (to include fire protection and fire hydrants locations) have been complied wi th . - 11. Pay Capital Improvement fees: Street Storm Drain - Park $ .03 per square foot of lot area. $ .02 per square foot of lot area. $ .10 per square foot of building area. 5. Single-Family Residence - 4180 West Crestview Drive - Steve Gonzales (Wesco Consulting) - Staff presented proposal for a single-family residence to be located at 4180 West Crestview Drive, stating proposal meets all ordinance requirements. Mr. Eugene Colombini, of Wesco Consulting, representing the applicant questioned condition number 2. Discussion was held on condition number 2 (The plot plan shows two driveways. Only one driveway is permitted). Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Single-Family Residence at 4180 West Crestview Drive with staff recommendation, deleting condition number 2, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Appro ve d 5- 0 1. Construct concrete sidewalk across frontage. - 2. 1~~/pl~t/pl~~/~~~W~/tw~/~fi*~w~#~/.//0~li/~~~/~fj*~w~i/j$/p~f~jtt~~/. DELETED. 3. Provide water availability letter from Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 4. Comply with the County Fire Department requirements. " Minutes of Design Review Board December 6, 1983 Page 4 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE - 4180 WEST CRESTVIEW DRIVE - STEVE GONZALES (WESCO CONSULTING) CONTI NUE D 5. Provide sewage disposal facilities as required and approved by the City of Lake Elsinore, the County Health Department, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. 6. Pay the requi red fee and submit pl ans to the County Flood Control District for review and recommendations for flood protection. The Flood Control recommendations confi rmed by the City Engineer shall be complied with. These will be in addition to those Flood Control improvements given in number 7 below. 7. For flood protection: a) The floor levels shall be raised three feet. b) A block wall of a desi gn approved by the City Engineer shall be constucted along the west property 1 i ne from the street ri ght-of-way to the edge of the 60 foot flood control easement. c) A three- foot hi gh compacted berm, with a two- foot top width, 2-to-1 side slopes and rip-rap face shall be constructed along the southerly line of the 60-foot wide flood control easement from side- ward to side yard and connect to the north end of the reta i ni ng wall. - 8. Pay Capital Improvement fees as follows: a) Street $ .03 per square foot of lot area. b) Storm Drainage - $ .02 per square foot of lot area. c) Park $ .10 per square foot of building area. 9. Record "Ho1d Harmless" and/or indemnification document protecting City against cl aims for flood damage. There being no further business, the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board adjourned at 9:45 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 Approved, - Whit Steed Chairman Res pec t full y s ubnritted, ~{d~ P7~ Linda Gri nds ta ff ./ Planning Commission Secretary - - ... MINUTES OF HELD ON THE 20TH. LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION DAY OF DECEMB ER 1983 -- THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:30 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by City Planner, Jim Corcoran. ROLL CALL found Commissioner Saathoff, Commissioner Dominguez, Commissioner Washburn, Commissioner Barnhart and Chairman Steed. Also present were City Planner Jim Corcoran, City Engineer Norm Rubel, and Associate Planner Howard Fields. MINUTE ACTION Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve minutes of December 6, 1983, as submitted, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. General Plan Amendment 83-6 - Reden, Inc. - Staff presented proposal for a General Plan Amendment to change the density from Medium (6.1 du/acre) to High (12.1-20 du/acre), to enable construction of 18 condominium units on 1.21 acres, located on Joy Street approximately 500 feet west of the intersection of River- side Drive. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:32 p.m., asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of General Plan Amendment 83-6. Mr. Greg Reden was present and requested that conditions 6, 11, and 13 be deleted. Mr. -- Reden stated that as part of their negotiations with the City (City Manager and City Attorney) they were told that the mitigation fees for drainage, traffic and public safety fees would not be assessed against their project through this General Plan Amendment, because they had already received prior approval and would be relieved of paying these fees. Mr. Reden stated that he spoke with the City Manager this morning and was told to bring this to the attention of the Planning Commission. The City Engineer stated that it would be appropriate for the Commission to recommend deletion of these conditions. Chairman asked if there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor of the project. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 7:35 p.m. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve General Plan Amendment 83-6 with staff recommendations and deleting conditions 6, 11 and 13, second by Commissioner Ba rnha rt. Approved 5-0 1. Existing right-of-way on Joy Street is 60 feet. No additional right-of- way is required. -- 2. Install curb and gutter on Joy Street per approved street improvement plans on file in City Engineer's office. 3. Construct standard sidewalk to match existing sidewalk separated from curb line by parkway. Construct standard driveway approaches to City Standards as shown on approved grading plan. 4. Construct asphalt paving to City Standards on Joy Street (T.I. = 6.5). Some paving exists on Joy Street. Tests must show that existing paving is to City Standards and will support the traffic index. 5. Provide City Engineer with a preliminary and final soils report to include street design. Provide grading certification. 6. P~i/~~~jt~~7~/~t~jn~g~/~jtjg~tj~n/f~~/jn/t~~/~~~~nt/~f/$~~~~~/.~~/. DELETED. 7. Provide street lighting per approved plans. Minutes of Planning Commission December 20, 1983 Pa ge 2 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83-6 - REDEN, INC. CONTINUED 8. Existing sewer facility is in Joy Street. Applicant to conform to City Standards and specifications for connection to City sewer system. Provide cleanout at property line. 9. Provide to City a water availability letter from serving agency. 10. Provide written assurance that the County Fire Department requirements (to include fire protection and fire hydrant locations) have been complied with. There is an existing fire hydrant adjacent to and northwesterly of the subject property. - 11. Pilll ~~(J/U~lUcj,~af~1 fr/Jtlttaffi t/rf;ljf-j MU.r/Jft/jrf;lfJa~t/ f~~fjft/t~Marf;lr/J~f1t/r/Jf $/~~~~~/.~~/. DELETED. 12. Pay Capital Improvement fees: Street Storm Drain Park Sewer - $ - $ $ - $ .03 per square foot of lot area. .02 per square foot of lot area. .10 per square foot of building area. 420.00 for each residential unit. 13. Pail'~~lj~/~af~t#lf~~/.1 DELETED. 'r/Jlj~~llllllllflllll~/l~/~/$t~~/.~~/fr/Jf/~at~/f~cj,~~~f1tja1/~f1jt 'jt~llllllllllflllll~/l~/~/$III/.l~/p~tIGtr/Jcj,cj,lflr/Jr/Jflat~a 14. Dedicate subsurface water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore. 15. Provide letter of consent to assist City in forming a Lighting and Landscaping District. - Motion by Commissioner Washburn to adopt Resolution Number 83-9, second by Commissioner Barnhart, entitled as follows: Approved 5-0 RESOLUTION NO. 83-9 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMEND- MENT 83-6. 2. Tentative Parcel Map 19767 - Centennial Engineering - Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to continue Tentative Parcel Map 19767 to the meeting of February 7, 1984, second by Commissioner Saathoff. Approved 5-0 3. Tentative Tract Map 19750 - Buster-Alles - Staff presented proposal for a sub- division of 38.15 acres into 108 single-family residential lots, located at the intersection of lakeshore Drive and Mountain Street. City Engineer stated that he had met with the applicant this afternoon and they talked at great lengths about the conditions and made compromises on a few, the City Engineer then distributed the revised conditions. Chairman asked i-f the applicant had received_ a revised copy of the conditions. City Engineer stated that the applicant has received a copy of the revised conditions. Discussion was then held on conditions 15, 21, 27 and 37. Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m., asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of Tentative Tract Map 19750. Mr. Doug Masson, representing the applicant, was present and stated they were in agreement with the revised conditions, but there are two additional items that we request the Commission consider passing on a recommendation to City Council: One of which is for some off-site road improvements which are required in conditions 10 and 11, what we had suggested was for those off-site road improvements that we are re- quired to construct in that area, we be given credit against the Capital Improve- ment fee fo r streets. Minutes of Planning Commission December 2Dt 1983 Page 3 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 19750. - BUSTER ALLES CDNTINUED - Mr. Masson stated that he understood that the $.0.3 Capital Improvement Fee is broken down in two componentst $.0.2 of which is for construction of capital improvements and major roads throughout the city, and $.01 for maintenance, we would be satisfied with a credit against that $.0.2 square foot fee for the off-site road improvements; the hillside portion of the property will be served with a 40. foot wide road as stated in condition number 18, and we would have a 32 foot curb-to-curb width in there for the terminust and we would suggest that sidewalk be eliminated on at least one side. Discussion was held on which side the sidewalk should be placed. Chairman asked if there was anyone else present wishing to speak in favor. Mr. Bud Alles stated he was in agreement with the revised conditions and would answer any questions the Commission had re- garding the request of reimbursement. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favort the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. Mr. William Griff stated before he opposed this projectt he would like to ask if Tentative Tract Map 19750. and Tentative Tract Map 150.20. Revised would be on sewer or septic. Mr. Griff was informed that both tracts would be on sewer. Mr. Griff stated no further opposition. There being no one else wishing to speak in opposition the public hearing was closed at 8:0.2 p.m. Discussion was held on cul-de-sac parking; CC & R's to include prohibiting vehicle storage (boats, trailers, recreational vehicles and trucks more than one ton of load capacity) and t.v. satellite disks; requesting lot for park instead of money; and City entrance sign.. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Tentative Tract Map 19750. wHh staff recommendations and amendments, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0. PLANNING DIVISIDN CDNDITIDNS: - 1. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 2. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. 3. A finding of conformity to the existing General Plan. 4. Meet all requirements of Drdinance 572. 5. Recordation of CC & R's prohibiting vehicle storage (boats, trailerst recreational vehicles and trucks more than one ton load capacitY)t and t.V. satellite disks. 6. Agreement with the Elementary and High School District to off-set overcrowdi ng. 7. Provide transit facilities if applicable. 8. Provide sign plans for "Entry" into CitYt to be approved by Planning Department and brought back to Design Review Board for approval. 9. Provide landscaping plan automatic sprinkler system for 6 foot area between sidewalk and blockwall to be approved by Planning Department. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CDNDITIDNS: 10.. Robb Road one-half street right-of-way width is presently 3D feet. The General Plan requires a 55 foot one-half street width. Dedicate 25 feet of additional ri ght-of-way from the north tract boundary t southerly to the existing street improvements constructed for Tract 14901. If right- of-way beyond the south boundary of this Tract cannot be acquiredt the City will consider eminent domain and require a bond be posted by the developer to guarantee future right-of-way acquisition and construction. APPLICABLE TO. STRAIGHTENING DF RDBB RDAD APPLICANT RECEIVE A CREDIT AGAINST THE $.02 PDRTIDN DF THE STREET CAPITAL IMPRDVEMENT FEE NDT TO. EXCEED THE TDTAL FEE DF $ .0.2, . 11. Dedicate additional street width at thacurve where Robb Road turns into Lakeshore Drive to provide the maximum street centerline curve radius possible and still meet the alignment of the existing street improvements constructed with Tract 1490.1. It is expected that at least a 60.0 foot radius curve is possible. Dedicate the added right-of-way for the longer Minutes of Planning Commission December 20, 1983 Pa ge 4 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 19750 - BUSTER ALLES CONTINUED curve radius. The developer shall provide a proposed design of the future intersection of Grand Avenue, Lakeshore Drive and Robb Road for consideration and discussion by the Planning Commission and City Council. The approved design shall be considered in the construction of the Robb Road realignment. APPLICABLE TO STRAIGHTENING OF ROBB ROAD APPLICANT RECEIVE A CREDIT AGAINST THE $.02 PORTION OF THE STREET CAPITAL IMPROVE- MENT FEE NOT TO EXCEED THE TOTAL FEE OF $.02. - 12. Construct a 22 foot wide median in Robb Road for the distance around the longer radius curve where adequate width of pavement is available. Pro- vide a design for Planning Commission approval for an entrance sign with trees and plantings in the median. The design shall also include a pro- posal for the surfacing and/or planting the remainder of the median. The developer is responsible for constructing one-half of 22 foot wide median for the full Robb Road frontage of the tract to meet the existing Tract 14901 public improvements. The developer must bond for future construction of one-hal f of this median. The bond shall be of a type and amount approved by the City Manager. Credit will be allowed for the portion of full width median. 13. IIAII Street shall align with future Mountain Avenue to the west. Street IIA" across lots 10,14,13,12, and 11 shall be planned for 60 foot right-of- way with 40 feet curb-to-curb. Build 10 foot beyond centerline as shown on tentative map. Pave to City Standards (T.I. = 6.5). 14. Construct curb and gutter 43 feet from centerline on Robb Road and paving to City Standards from centerline to gutter (T.I. = 8.5). Existing paving must be reconstructed, unless tests show it is adequate for this traffic index. 15. Construct a 5-1/2 foot wide sidewalk adjacent to the curb on Robb Road to conform to existing Tract 14901. Provide planting and an automatic irrigation system between back of sidewalk and the block wall on the tract boundary. The planting plan shall be approved by the Planning Commission. 16. Sidewalks shall be 5 feet wide and adjacent to the property line along all interior streets. - 17. Driftwood Lane from Tract 14901 to Ohio Street to be 56 foot right-of-way and 36 feet curb-to-curb. Construct paving to City Standards (T.I. = 6.5). 18. The street in unit 4 (Hillside Street) shall be 40 foot right-of-way with a 32 feet curb-to-curb and 4 foot sidewalk. Pave to City Standards (T.I. = 5.0). HILL STREET AREA INCORPORATE ONE SIDEWALK EITHER SIDE RE- QUESTED, CAN BE CHOSEN BY STAFF (ENGINEERING). 19. Ohio Street shall be 60 foot right-of-way with 40 feet curb-to-curb. Pave to City Standards (T.I. = 6.5). 20. Court C, 0, and E and Driftwood Lane shall be 50 foot right-of-way with 36 feet curb-to-curb. 21. The connection from Court 110" to Robb Road shall be eliminated and developer be allowed to add another lot. 22. Provide soil and geology report including street design. Provide final soil report showing compliance with preliminary report and certification of compliance with detailed grading plan. - 23. Provide street lighting. 24. Comply with requirements of flood control report dated December 5, 1983. The City Engineer shall judge as to interpretation and appl ication of flood control recommendations. 25. Provide detailed hydraulogy and hydraulics study and show how requirements of the flood control report can be complied with. Minutes of Planning Commission December 20, 1983 Pa ge 5 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 19750 - BUSTER ALLES CONTINUED 26. Pay an off-site drainage impact mitigation fee of $ 350.00 per lot for the Lakeshore storm drain to the east. If drainage must be diverted to _ the southerly side of Lakeshore Drive an additional impact fee will be required for drainage to the south watershed. If drainage must be diverted across Lakeshore Drive to the sourtherly watershed, provide City with drainage release and/or hold harmless agreement as approved by the City Attorney. 27. Comply with the requirement of the City, County Health Department and Riverside County Water Quality Control Board for sewer service. Participate equitably in the cost of extending a sewer main up Lakeshore Drive with reimbursement agreement with City and providing added capacity in the pumping stations, trunk sewer system and the sewage treatment plant. This sewer fee is in addition to the sewer capital fee of $420.00 required by Ordinance 572. Provide cleanout on all sewer laterals at the property line. 28. Provide a will serve letter guaranteeing water service. 29. Comply with the County Health Department requirements for fire protection. - 30. Pay a traffic safety mitigation fee for traffic signalization in the amount of $ 225.00 per lot. 31. Cooperate with the City in forming a Lighting and Landscaping District. 32. Plans and specifications to be prepared by a Civil Engineer and include signing and striping. 33. Provide trees for all lots and special landscaping along Robb Road. Submit plan for tree type and location, to be approved by Planning Com- mission. 34. Pay Capital Improvement fees as follows: Street Park Storm' Drain Sewer $ .03 per squa re foot of lot a rea $ .10 per square foot of building area $ .02 per square foot of lot area $420.00 per residential unit 35. Pay Pub 1 i c Sa fety fees as follows: Police Fire - $250.00 $150.00 $400.00 per residential unit TOTAL 36. Unit two shall be constructed first. As an alternative, units one or three could be constructed first if bonding is provided to the City for Robb Road improvements and drainage improvements across the frontage of uni t two. 37. A plan shall be provided to City to eliminate or properly maintain the concrete drain along the rear of lots 43, 44, 45, and 71 through 84, and if possible and/or practical to drain these lot areas entirely to the street. 38. Dedicate underground water rights to the City. 39. Provide a Class II Bicycle lane. 4. Tentative Tract Map 15020 REVISED - Buster Alles - Staff presented proposal for a subdivision of 43.6 acres into 127 single-family residential lots, located westerly of Terra Cotta Road. City Engineer stated that he had met with the applicant this afternoon and they talked at great lengths about the conditions and made compromises on a few. Chairman opened the public hearing at 8:19 p.m., asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of Tentative Tract Map 15020 Minutes of Planning Commission December 20, 1983 Page 6 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15020 REVISED - BUSTER ALLES CONTINUED REVISED. Mr. Doug Masson, representing the applicant, was present and stated they were in agreement with the revised conditions, but has similar request that on condition number 7 that they be granted the same credit on Capital Improvements ($.02 credit against capital improvement fees). There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 8:22 p.m. Discussion was held on condition number 5 and 7;-sidewalk for Terra Cotta Road; and providing bicycle lane. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Tentative Tract Map 15020 REVISED with staff recommendations and amendments, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 - PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: 1. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 2. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. 3. A finding of conformity to the existing General Plan. 4. Meet all requirements of Ordinance 572. 5. CC & R's to be approved by Planning Department. 6. Agreement with the Elementary and High School District to off-set overcrowdi ng. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 7. A 40 foot ri ght-of-way exists along Terra Cotta Road across the southeast corner of this tract. The General Plan requires a 100 foot width for Terra Cotta Road. - Dedicate an additional 30 feet right-of-way for a 50 foot one-half street. Developer must construct a one-half street extension of Terra Cotta Road to Lakeshore Drive to align with existing Illinois Street on the south side of Lakeshore Drive. The City will utilize eminent domain to assist the developer in obtaining right-of-way. Developer must bear all costs of sufficient right-of-way for the west one-half of the future 100 foot wide street and the additional ri ght-of-way and street construction necessary to provide two travel lanes with adequate shoulders and drainage which will align with existing Illinois Street. The off-tract Terra Cotta street wo rk sha 11 be bonded before recordi ng the fi rs t phase fi na 1 map. The City will consider a reimbursement agreement with the developer for thi s off-tract street extens ion. The developer shall prepare an alignment plan for Terra Cotta Road from Lakeshore northerly to at least three hundred feet beyond the subdivision boundary. The 450 foot radius shall be increased to 600 foot if practical at the south tract boundary. APPLICANT RECEIVE CREDIT AGAINST THE $.02 PORTION OF THE CAPITAL STREET IMPROVEMENT FEES OR HIS AGREEING TO ITEM 7, CREDIT NOT TO EXCEED THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT OF $.02. 8. Curb and gutter shall be installed on Terra Cotta Road 38 feet from the centerline across the frontage of this development and to Lakeshore Drive. Provision must be made to grade and drain the area between Terra Cotta Road and existing Tract 14901 as approved by the City Engineer. Paving shall De to City Standards (T.I. = 8.0). - 9. Harrison Street or another street connection farther north from "E" Street shall be extended out to Terra Cotta Road. This extension shall be 60 feet ri ght-of-way and 40 feet curb-to-curb. Street "A" and "0" shall be 60 feet ri ght-of-way and 40 feet curb-to-curb. Construct curb and paving to City Standards (T.I. = 6.5). Streets "B", "C", and "E" shall be 56 feet right-of-way and 36 feet curb-to-curb. 10. Construct 5 foot wide sidewalk adjacent to the property line. Minutes of Planning Commission December 20, 1983 Pa ge 7 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15020 REVISED - BUSTER AllES CONTINUED 11. Provide soils and geology report including street design. Provide final soil report showing compliance with preliminary report and certification of compliance with detailed grading plan. - 12. Provide street lighting. 13. Comply with requirements of flood control report dated November 30, 1983. The City Engineer shall judge as to application of flood control recommenda- t ions. 14. Provide detailed hydraulogy and hydraulics study and show how requirements of the flood control report can be complied with. 15. Pay an off-site drainage impact mitigation fee of $350.00 per lot for the lakeshore storm drain to the east. 16. Comply with the requirements of the City, County Health Department and Riverside County Water Quality Control Board for sewer service. Participate equitably in the cost of extending a sewer main up Lakeshore Drive with reimbursement of agreements with the city and providing added capacity in the pumping stations, trunk sewer system and the sewage treatment plant. This sewer fee is in addition to the sewer capital fee of $420.00 required by Ordinance 572. Provide cleanout on all sewer laterals at the property line. 17. - 18. r 19. 20. 2l. 22. Provide a will serve letter guaranteeing water service. Comply with the County Health Department requirements for fire protection. Pay a traffic safety mitigation fee for traffic signalization in the amount of $ 225.00 per lot. Cooperate with the City in forming a Lighting and Landscaping District. Plans and specifications to be prepared by a Civil Engineer and include signing and striping. Pay Capital Improvement fees as follows: Street $ .03 per square foot of lot area Park $.10 per square foot of bui 1 di ng a rea Storm Drain - $ .02 per square foot of lot area Sewer - $420.00 per residential unit 23. Pay Public Safety fee as follows: Police Fi re TOTAL - $250.00 $150.00 $400.00 per residential unit 24. A plan shall be provided to City to eliminate or properly maintain the concrete drain along the rear of Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 and if possible and/or practical drain these lot areas entirely to the street. 25. Dedicate underground water rights to the City. 26. Unit one shall not be recorded until bonds have been posted to guarantee off-tract Terra Cotta Road improvements. 27. Provide trees for each lot. Provide plan for type and location for approval by Planning Commission. 28. Plans and specifications to be prepared by a Civil Engineer including signs arid striping. 29.. Provide Class II Bicycle lane. Minutes of Planning Commission December 20, 1983 Page 8 5. Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report - Ramsgate - Staff presented Ramsgate's Draft Specific Plan and E.I .R. A residential specific plan for approximately 1212 acres that would allow a maximum of 2975 dwelling units along with commercial and recreational uses, located north of 1-15 and east of Highway 74. Chairman opened the public hearing at 8:27 p.m., asking for those present wishing to speak in favor of the Specific Plan and E.I .R. for Ramsgate. Mr. Dan Salceda, the project manager, requested that the Commission look at the Specific Plan and E.I.R. as the final embodiment of _ the documents for Ramsgate, therefore requesting the Commission to make a recommendation to City Council regarding the certification of the E.I.R. as well as the final document Specific Plan. Mr. Salceda gave background on the project addressing such issues as land use (residential and commercial); project being phased over 12-15 years; preservation of open space; grading for the project (phased over the life of the project); waste-water; schools and having a geotechnical engineer on site during grading in case any artifacts are discovered. Mr. Tom Weigel presented slides on the project. There being no one else present wishing to speak in favor, the Chairman then asked for those who opposed. There being no opposition the public hearing was closed at 8:56 p.m. Discussion was held on agencies comments being incorporated into the Specific Plan; street widths (reference residential being done before commercial). Mr. Salceda stated this will be worked out with Cal Trans; infra- structure in other nei ghborhoods; and space for pl acement 0 f monument entrance sign to the City. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Specific Plan and E.I.R. for Ramsgate as final documents with staff recommendations including agency comments, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 1. That the Specific Plan is consistent with area development and will implement the General Plan. 2. The Specific Plan as designated with the proposed conditions, will mitigate the concerns enumerated in staff's report. 3. The proposed densities and open space are compatible with development of the area. - BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Lot Line Adjustment 83-11 - Bill Jones - Staff presented proposal for a Lot Line Adjustment realigning 9 unuseab1e lots to 4 lots, located northerly of Railroad Canyon Road and 1-15. Discussion was held on conditions 13,14,15,17,18,19, and 22 being applicable at building stage, and Railroad Canyon Road classification at 110 feet. Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve Lot Line Adjustment 83-11 with staff recommendations and conditions 13,14,15,17,18,19, and 22 being app1 i cab1 e at bui1 di ng permit stage, second by Commiss ioner Domi nguez. Approved 5-0 PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: 1. City Engi neer veri fi cation 0 f 1 egal descri ption as accurate. 2. Issuance of a Certificate of Compliance. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 3. Railroad Canyon Road is classified by the General Plan as an arterial corridor with 110 feet of right-of-way, 86 feet of roadway and a 22 foot median. A 55 foot wide one-half right-of-way exists on Railroad Canyon Road and no more dedication is required. .... 4. The frontage road adjacent to Lots 1 'and 2 has an existing 80 foot right-of-way. An 88 foot right-of-way was required for access to Canyon Lake Hill along the alignment of this frontage road. Dedicate an additional four feet of right-of-way, or the added right-of-way needed by the bridge for Canyon Lake Hills, whichever is greater. Minutes of Planning Commission December 20, 1983 Page 9 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 83-11 - BILL JONES CONTINUED 12. - 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 5. Install curb and gutter on Railroad Canyon Road 43 feet from centerline. Provide bonded agreement for future installation of one-hal f of 22 foot median island on Rail road Canyon Road across the frontage of this pro- posed development. Install 8 foot wide sidewalk. Required at building permit s ta ge. 6. Install curb and gutter on Frontage Road 32 feet from centerline. Install 8 foot sidewalk. Required at building permit stage. 7. Pave Railroad Canyon Road from centerline to curb line using T.I. = 8.5 for Railroad Canyon Road and T.I. = 7.5 for Frontage Road. Some paving exists on both Railroad Canyon Road and Frontage Road. Tests must show that it can support the required traffic index. Required at building permi t stage. 8. Provide street trees if required at building permit stage. 9. Provide street lights at building permit stage. 10. Cooperate with the City in establishing a Lighting and Landscaping District. 11. Provide sanitary sewer service as approved by the City, the County Health Department, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Provide letter of agreement to participate in a regional sewage collection, treatment and disposal system. Provide the City with a will serve letter from the water serving agency at b u il din g s ta g e . Comply with requi rements 0 f the County Fi re Department. Two fi re hydrants exist in the area of this project. Required at building stage. Pay equitable share of traffic safety mitigation fee for traffic signal costs. The proposed fee is $ 12,000.00. Required at building stage. Provi de off-site improvement p1 ans and speci fi cations prepared by a Ci vi1 Engineer including signing and striping. Provide grading plan and soils report to include pavement design and final report with grading certification. Required at building stage. Pay Public Safety fee in the amount of $.30 per gross floor area. Required at building stage. 18. Pay Capital Improvement fees as follows: Required at building stage. Street Storm Dra-i n - Park Sewer $ .03 per square foot of lot area $ .02 per square foot of lot area $ .01 per square foot of lot area $420.00 for twenty plumbing fixture units 19. Pay storm drainage impact mitigation fee of $ 5,000.00 for off-site drainage facilities payable at building permit stage. 20. Dedicate subsurface water rights to the City of Lake Elsinore. 21. Provide City with a Hold Harmless or Indemnification against flood damage as required by the City Attorney. 22. Bond amount for one-half of median shall include cost of City entrance sign and decorative paving and/or landscaping of the median. Required at buil di ng stage. Minutes of Planning Commission December 20, 1983 Pa ge 10 2. Commerci a 1 Project 83-10 - Rancho Cons ul tants - Sta ff presented proposal for a 71,307 square foot retail commercial center to be located at the northwest intersection of Riverside Drive and Lincoln Street. Mr. Hand, manager and general partner of the project, was present and questioned conditions 11, 14, and 20. Discussion was held on these conditions. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Commercial Project 83-10 with staff recommendations and amendments, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Appro ved 5-0 - PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: 1. All items depicted on plot plan/landsc.ape plan and elevations shall be provided as indicated on the plot plan, unless otherwise modified by the Planning Commission. 2. Recordation of City Council CC & R's (Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions). 3. All conditions of both the Planning Commission and Design Review Board to be met prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 4. Applicant to provide handicapped parking spaces as provided in Title 24 State Code. 5. A fi ndi ng of con fo rmance to the General Pl an. 6. A finding of no significant impact upon the environment. 7. Issuance of a Negative Declaration. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 8. Riverside Drive (State Highway 74): a) Dedicate 20 feet of right-of-way along Riverside Drive frontage. b) Exi s ti ng ri gh",: -0 f-way is 60 feet. c) State wants 100 feet of right-of-way. General Plan calls for 100 feet of right-of-way. - ~. Lincoln Street: a) Dedicate three feet of right-of-way along Lincoln Street frontage. b) Existing right-of-way is 60 feet. c) Existing 44 foot curb-to-curb width warrants a total of 66 foot future right-of-way to conform to General Plan requirements 66-44 for collector street classification on figure CIR-2. d) Dedicate additional right-of-way to provide for a 60 foot total right-of-way with standard cul-de-sac to match existing improve- ments . 10. Install curb and gutter 38 feet from street centerline to Ca1-Trans standards along Riverside Drive. Install curb and gutter 18 feet from street right-of-way centerline along Flannery Street and connect to existing curb and gutter. Curb and gutter exists on Lincoln Street. Remove and replace existing curb and gutter that is damaged and install curb return and cross gutter at Lincoln Avenue and Riverside Drive. - 11. Construct 8 foot wide sidewalk along Riverside Drive and Lincoln Street and 6 foot wide sidewalk on Flannery Street. Construct two ingress/egress 30 foot driveways and one 25 foot exit only on Flannery Street. Present plan reflects four driveway access points on this street. Construct one 30 foot driveway on Lincoln Street to line up with proposed driveway location across Lincoln Street on Commercial Project 83-3. Minutes of Planning Commission December 20, 1983 Page 11 COMMERCIAL PROJECT 83-10 - RANCHO CONSULTANTS CONTINUED 12. Construct asphalt paving to City Standards from centerline to curb line on all surrounding streets. Paving exists on all surrounding streets. Tests must show that existing paving is to City Standards and will support the traffic index. Traffic indexes are as follows: Ri vers ide Dri ve Lincoln Street Fl annery Street - L!. = 8.5 - T.I. = 7.0 - L!. = 6.0 13. Provide City Engineer with soils report to include street design. Provide final soils report and grading certification. 14. Drainage for subject property must be directed to Riverside Drive, and conveyed under the sidewalk in an acceptable manner as approved by the City Engineer. Pay equitable drainage mitigation impact fee in the amount of $20,000.00. DEFER WITH BONDING. 15. Provide street lighting. Existing power poles may be utilized on which street lights can be mounted. Otherwise install decorative s ta n da rds . 16. Plans for off-site work shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer, including signing and striping. 17. Existing sewer facilities are located in lincoln Street and Riverside Drive. Applicant to conform to City Standards, and specifications for connection to City sewer system and pay sewer connection fees as listed - below. Install sewer cleanout at property line. 18. Provide to City a water availability letter from servicing agency. Dedicate subsurface water rights to the City of lake Elsinore. 19.. Provide written assurance the County Fire Department requirements (to include fire protection and fire hydrant locations) have been compl i ed with. 20. Applicant to pay a traffic safety impact mitigation fee for traffic signalization for lincoln Street and Riverside Drive in the amount of $ 32,500.00. DEFER WITH BONDING. 21. Provide letter of agreement to assist City in forming a Lighting and landscaping District. 22. Obtain encroachment permit from Cal-Trans and pay all applicable fees. 23. Applicant to agree that on-street parking on lincoln Street shall be prohibited. 24. Pay Capital Improvement fees: Street Storm Drain - Park S ewe r $ .03 per square foot of lot area $ .02 per square foot of lot area $ .01 per square foot of lot area $420.00 for twenty plumbing fixture units COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT None PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Commissioner Saathoff - None Minutes of Planning Commission December 20, 1983 Pa ge 12 PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONTINUED Commissioner Dominguez - At the last meeting I requested a copy of the Overlay Ordinance, did we get anything on that? City Planner stated that we have no record in our files of a final Overlay Ordinance coming to us from the committee, and was hoping to contact Howie Torn in the near future to see what the status is. Commissioner Dominguez stated that he would contact Howie Torn. Commissioner Saathoff asked who the Chai rman of the committee was, and was informed that Bud Attridge was the Chairman on the Overlay Ordinance Committee. - Inquired about the opening .in the street in front of the restaurant (across from the bank). Commissioner Dominguez was informed that it was still open, also there is one up across from the Mobil station, there are barricades that have been there for 2-3 months. The City Engineer stated that the one at Heald and Main would be closed up soon, and at Flint and Main they were rebuilding the top of that manhole and the barricades can come down. Commissioner Washburn - How is the applicant progressing with the restaurant on Main Street? Commissioner Barnhart stated that the applicants were working on the restaurant on the weekends. The City Engineer stated that they were in the process of getting off-site improvements. Commissioner Washburn requested that anything that can be done to speed that up would be appreciated. Commissioner Barnhart - Asked if there was anything on the citation she brought up at the last meeting on the burned down structure on Chestnut (Graham). City Planner stated he checked with the Code Enforcement Officer who issued the citation, and it is still going through the stages. Commissioner Dominguez stated he thought that they were going to simplify that Ordinance where we could go ahead and take care of that within 30 days if the owner did not do it. Recommends that staff look into how they can streamline, speed up or actually clean up under city guidelines. With the rest of the Commissioner's permission, I would like a letter of best wishes sent to our one citizen who will be 101 years old tomorrow, Ms. Effa Newton. - Commissioner Dominguez recommended that a study session with City Council be scheduled. City Planner to coordinate with City Council to schedule this study session. Chairman Steed - None Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to adjourn to Design Review Board, second by Com- missioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 - ~lINUTES OF HELD ON THE 20TH. MI NUTE ACT! ON LAKE ELSINORE DEISGN REVIEW BOARD DAY OF DECEMBER 1983 - - Motion by Commissioner Saathoff to approve minutes of December 6, 1983, as submitted, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 B US I NESS ITEMS 1. Commercial Project 83-11 - California Property Exchange - Staff presented pro- posal for a 5,600 square foot commerci al buil di ng to be used for offi ces, to be located at 350 Railroad Canyon Road. Staff informed the Board that the applicant failed to obtain a building permit within the allotted time frame, therefore, plans are being resubmitted to the Design Review Board for approval. The City Engineer stated that he had met with the applicant and talked at great lengths about the conditions and made compromises on a few. Mr. Fred Crowe, represent- ing the applicant, questioned conditions 3, 11, 12, 23, 28, and the last sentence in condition number 30. Discussion was held on these conditions. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Commercial Project 83-11 with staff recommendations and amendments, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: 1. Pay Capital Improvement fees in accordance with the ordinances and resolutions in effect at the time of issuance of building permit. -. 2. Applicant shall coordinate trees and shrubs in planting areas with the Planning Department and shall designate these trees on the site plan. 3. Areas of leaching shall be planted with grass and/or ground cover. 4. All trees shall be at least 15 gallons. 5. Permanent and automatic irrigation facilities shall be provided for all planting areas. 6. Interior planters and planters adjacent to the building shall be separated from parking areas by a six (6) inch high concrete curb. 7. All trash areas, outside storage of equipment and mechanical roof equip- ment shall be effectively screened and shall receive written approval from the Planning Director. 8. All signs shall be approved by the Planning Department. 9. All trees adjacent to right-of-way shall use Deep Root Control Planters. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 10. Railroad Canyon Road is classified by the General Plan as an arterial corridor with 110 foot right-of-way, 86 foot roadway and 22 foot median. A 55 foot wide one-half foot right-of-way exists on Railroad Canyon Road and no more dedication is required. 11. The frontage road, Grape Street, is cl ass i fi ed by the General Pl an as a secondary corridor with 88 foot right-of-way and 64 foot roadway. A 40 foot wide right-of-way exists easterly of the centerline. An additional 4 foot width of right-of-way dedication is required. Provide title report and dedication deed to City. For the first General Plan Amendment in 1984 staff will recommend that Grape Street classification be reduced to 80-64. 12. Install curb and gutter on Railroad Canyon Road 43 feet from centerline. Minutes of Design Review Board December 20, 1983 Page 2 COMMERCIAL PROJECT 83-11 - CALIFORNIA PROPERTY EXCHANGE CONTINUED 13. Install curb and gutter on Grape Street (Frontage Road) 32 feet from centerline. Install 8 foot wide sidewalk. 14. Pave Railroad Canyon Road from centerline to curb line using T.I. of 8.5 for Railroad Canyon Road and 7.5 for Grape Street (Frontage Road). Some paving exists on both Railroad Canyon Road and Grape Street. ... Tests must show that it can support the required traffic index, subject to City Engi neer I s approval. 15. Process a lot split in order that a certificate of compliance can be recorded to eliminate interior recorded lot lines. 16. Provide street trees if required. 17. Move driveway farther east as approved by the City Engineer. 18. Provide street lights. 19. Cooperate with City in establishing a Lighting and Landscaping District. 20. Provide sanitary sewer service as apprbved by the City, the County Health Department and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Provide letter agreeing to participate in a Regional Sewage collection, treatment and disposal system. 21. Provide the City with a will-serve letter from the water serving agency. 22. Comply with requirements of the County Fire Department. A fire hydrant exists adjacent to the property. 23. Pay equitable share of traffic safety mitigation fee for traffic signal costs. The proposed fee is $ 5,000.00. Sufficient instrument acceptable to insure performance be provided by applicant. - 24. Provide off-site improvements plans and specifications prepared by Civil Engineer including signing and striping. 25. Provide soils report to include pavement design. 26. Pay Public Safety fee in the amount of $.15 per square foot gross floor area for police service and $.15 per square foot gross floor area for fire. 27. Pay Capital Improvement fees as follows: Sewer Street S to rm Ora i n - Park $420.00 for 20 fixture units $ .03 per square foot of lot area $ .02 per square foot of lot area $ .01 per square foot of lot area 28. Pay equitable storm drainage impact mitigation fee for off-site drainage facilities in an amount not to exceed $10,000.00. Sufficient instrument to insure performance by applicant, but if improvements are needed it will be done at building permit stage. - 29. Provi de recorded 20 foot easement for ingress and egress to adjacent properties to the northeast. 30. Enter into a recorded agreement with the City to participate equitably in the cost of a median in Railroad Canyon Road including decorative paving and/or landscaping and entrance sign. - - - Minutes of Design Review Board December 20, 1983 Page 3 2. Commercial Project 83-10 - Rancho Consultants - Staff presented proposal for a 71,307 square foot retail commercial center to be located at the northwest intersection of Riverside Drive and Lincoln Street. Discussion was held on landscaping for the project; and adding condition number 6 which will read: to incorporate a landscaping plan in which as many of the existing Walnut trees on the site, that can be maintained within the landscaping design be maintained, especially along the perimeters and any techniques that are possible to do that even though it may go against the ordinances on paving or engineering design be incorporated to do so, also refer to the General Plan which specifies they show this. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Commercial Project 83-10 with staff recommendations and amendments, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 . 1. All items depicted on plot plan/landscape plan and elevations shall be provided as indicated on the plot plan, unless otherwise modified by the Planning Commission/Design Review Board's conditions. 2. Striping for Class II Bicycle Lane. 3. Appropriate signs shall be approved by Planning Department. 4. All trash areas, and storage shall be screened and approved by the Planning Department. 5. All roof mounted support equipment incidental to the development shall be architecturally screened so that they are not visible from neighbor- ing property or public streets. 6. To incorporate a landscaping plan in which as many of the existing Walnut trees on the site, that can be maintained within the landscaping design be maintained, especially along the perimeters and any techniques that are possible to do that even though it may go against the ordinances on paving or engineering design be incorporated to do so, also refer to the General Plan which specifies they show this. 3. Commercial Addition - 32391 Riverside Drive - Bill Seers - Staff presented pro- posal for a commercial addition of 4,300 square feet which would be attached to existing lumber hardware store. Mr. Bill Seers was present and questioned the Fire Department requirements and conditions 6, 8, 11, 12 and 13. Discussion was held on these conditions. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Commercial Addition at 32391 Riverside Drive with staff recommendations and amendments, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: 1. Provide automatic sprinkler system within addition. 2. Adequate number and placement of fire extinguishers in intervals approved by County Fire Department and Building Inspector. 3. Providing fire hydrants where appropriate, as approved by the County Fire Department. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 4. No additional dedication for Riverside Drive is required. 5. Curb and gutter exists across the total lot frontage. 6. lntt~77/~/f~~t/tj~~~~7~/~tt~tt/t~~~jnjnB/pt~p~tti/~~~~t~nt/t~/ ~1*~t~j~~/~tj*~/'/ DELETED. 7. No additional paving is required for Riverside Drive. 8. ,t~*j~~/~n/~ff~ttj*~/~t~jn~B~/t~nn~ttft~n/t~/~tj~tjnB/~t~jn~B~/$tt~tt~t~ ~n~~t/~j*~t$j~~/~tj*~/~t/t~~/$~~t~~t7p/t~tn~t/~f/t~ftt/pt~p~tt#/~t/~pf ~~*~~/~i/t~~/~jti/inBjn~~t/.//'~i/~~~jt~~7~/~t~jn~B~/j~p~tt/~jtjB~tj~n f~~/jn/t~~/~~~nt/~f/$~~~~~/.~~/. DELETED. Minutes of Design Review Board December 20, 1983 Page 4 COMMERCIAL ADDITION - 32391 RIVERSIDE DRIVE - BILL SEERS CONTINUED 9. 't~*j~~/itt~~t/ljB~tjnB/t~/~jti/ip~tjfjt~tj~ni/.//l~~f~/~t~/~~j$tjnB P~~~f/p~l~i/~7~nB/t~~/pt~p~tti/ft~nt~B~/~n/W~jt~/itt~~t/ljB~ti/t~~l~ ~~/~~nt~~/./ DELETED. 10. Provide written assurance that the County Fire Department requirements ( to include fire protection and fire hydrant locations) have been compl i ed with. --- 11. Pay Capital Improvement Fees, if applicable to the addition: Sewer - $ 420.00 for twenty plumbing fixture units added 12. 0~t~jn/~ntt~~t~~~nt/p~t~jt/ft~~/t~lflt~ni/. DELETED. 13. 't~*j~~/itt~~t/tf~~i/~i/t~~pjf~~/~i/t~~/~jti/. DELETED 4. Residential Project 83-9 - Reden, Inc. - Staff presented proposal for 18 condominium units (which is in conjunction with General Plan Amendment 83-6), to be located on Joy Street approximately 500 feet west of the intersection of Riverside Drive. Mr. Fred Crowe, representing the applicant, requested that the conditions that were changed at Planning Commission, if the conditions are the same on Design Review Board, that they be changed to be in agreement. Chairman stated that any condition or changed condition approved by the Com- mission for the General Plan Amendment (83-6) that are duplicated on the Residential Project would be changed to conform with each other. Motion by Commissioner Dominguez to approve Residential Project 83-9 with staff recom- mendations, second by Commissioner Barnhart. Approved 5-0 1. Applicant shall construct the proposed condominium project in accordance ... with the requirements of the Design Review Board. 2. All exterior 1 i ghts necessary for the subject bui1 di ng and property be placed and fixed so as not to shine out onto any adjacent structure in the subdivision or any surrounding development in any manner so as to provide a nuisance or hazard to road traffic or affect the living environment of the area. 3. The Homeowner's Association shall be established prior to the sale of the last dwelling unit. 4. Membership in the Homeowner's Association shall be mandatory for each buyer and each successive buyer. 5. Applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a copy of the final condominium documents, including those portions of the CC & R's that apply to the conveyance of units, the assignment of parking and the management of common areas within the project before approval of the final map. The Planning Department and City Attorney shall approve and record said CC & R's. 6. CC & R's shall include a provision specifically disallowing exterior television antennas. 7. The CC & R's shall include a provision prohibiting outside uncovered and unenclosed, storage of boats, trailers, recreational vehicles and trucks more than one ton of load capacity. 8. That all roof maintained or ground support structures and equipment incidental to the development be architecturally screened so that they are not visible from the neighboring property or the public street, with such screening subject to approval of the Design Review Board. ~ Minutes of Design Review Board December 20, 1983 Pa ge 5 RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 83-9 - REDEN, INC. CONTINUED - 9. Except for strictly interior modifications to individual units, no substantial structural alterations, except for incidental maintenance, shall be made to any of the existing residential or common areas, unless plot plans and elevations are submitted to the Planning Department and a finding of substantial conformance is made. 10. Parking shall be covered and uncovered as indicated on the approved plot plan and all signs shall conform to the City's Sign Ordinance. 11. Applicant shall comply with all noise level regulations of the City. 12. Permanent and automatic irrigation facilities shall be provided in all off-site and on-site planted 1 andscape areas. 13. All landscape planters shall be separated from parking areas and vehicular accessways by a six-inch portland cement concrete curb. 14. Final landscape plans implementing the concept of the preliminary land- scape plans required by Section 17.38.040 shall be prepared and submitted to and approved by the Planning Department prior to the recordation of the fi na 1 ma p . 5. Single-Family Residence - 16320 Stevens Avenue - Warren l~icks - Staff presented proposal for a single-family residence to be located at 16320 Stevens Avenue. Proposal meets all Planning Department requirements. Mr. Warren Wicks was present and questioned conditions 3, 4, 5, 8, and 9, requesting that these -- conditions be deferred. Discussion was held on these conditions. Motion by Commissioner Washburn to approve Single-Family Residence at 16320 Stevens Avenue with staff recommendations and deleting conditions 3,4,5,8, and 9, second by Commissioner Dominguez. Approved 5-0 PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: 1. Applicant to construct per plot plan submitted, unless changed by Design Revi ew Boa rd. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 2. A 40 foot right-of-way exists on Stevens Avenue and Arnold Avenue. No addi tional ri ght-of-way dedi cation for Stevens Avenue and Arnol d Avenue will be required per City Council Resolution No. 77-7. a) An existing 50 feet of right-of-way exists on Dryden Street which conforms to the County right-of-way of Dryden between Lakeshore Drive and Lash Avenue. No additional right-of-way will be required. - 3. Jntt~lJ/t~t~/~n~/8~tt~t/t~/tjti/~t~n~~t~t/J~/f~~t/ft~~/ttt~~t/t~nt~tJjn~ ~~/~f~~l~/A*~n~~/~n~/~t~*~nt/A*~n~~/.//~~~~t~~/itt~~t/Wj~t~t/~~i/~~/~Jl~w~~ jf/~~n~f~l/Pl~n/A~~~~~~nt/~~f~/jt/~~pt~~/. DELETED. ~l//J~tt~ll/t~f~/~n~/~~tt~f/t~/tjti/~t~n~~f~t/~n/~f/~~n ~tt~~t/l~/f~~t/ft~~/ttt~~t/t~nt~tljn~/./ 4. t~nttt~tt/~/f~~t/tj~~~~l~/t~/tjti/~t~n~~f~t/~~A~t~nt/t~/t~f~/~n/~t~*~nt A*~n~~/~~~/Afn~l~/A*~n~~/.//t~n$tf~tt/~/f~~t/$j~~w~l~/~n/~fi~~n/~tf~~t/t~ tjti/~t~n~~f~t/~~A~t~nt/t~/pf~p~tti/ljn~/./ DELETED. 5. t~nitf~tt/p~*jn~/t~/tjti/~t~n~~f~t/ff~~/t~nt~fljn~/t~/t~f~ljn~/tl/.l/./f/~/.~) f~f/~t~*~nt~/~tn~l~/~n~/~f/~~n/./ DELETED. 6. Provide soils report to include street design to City Engineer. 7. Provide Grading Plan and Certificate of Survey to City Engineer. Minutes of Design Review Board December 20, 1983 Page 6 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 16320 STEVENS AVENUE - WARREN WICKS CONTINUED 8. Jntt~ll/ttf~~t/ljn~ttt)/t~/~jti/$p~tjfjt~tj~nt/./ DELETED. 9. P7~nt/f~f/~ffttft~/~~f~/t~~11/~~/pf~p~f~~/~I/~/~j*jl/~nnjn~~t/. DELETED. 10. Provide sanitary sewer service as approved by the City, the County Health Department, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. 11. Provide to the City a water availability letter from serving agency. 12. Provide written assurance that the County Fire Department requirements (to include fire protection and fire hydrant locations) have been compl i ed with. - 1 3. Pay Ca pita 1 I mpro vement Fees: Street - $ .03 per square foot of lot area Storm Drain - $ .02 per square foot of lot area Park - $ .10 per square foot of building area Sewer - $420.00 per residential unit 14. Pay Publ i c Sa fety Fees: Police Fire - $250.00 - $100.00 TOTAL $350.00 per residential unit 15. Provide street trees. 6. Single-Family Residence - 16664 Stevens Avenue - Wilfrid Atkinson - Staff pre- _ sented proposal for a single-family residence to be located at 16664 Stevens Avenue. Proposal meets all Planning Department requirements. Discussion was held on conditions 2, 3,4,7, and 8. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart to approve Single-Family Residence at 16664 Stevens Avenue with staff recommenda- tions and deleting conditions 2, 3, 4, 7, and 8, second by Commissioner Saatho ff. Approved 5-0 1. An existing 40 foot right-of-way exists on Stevens Avenue. Additional right-of-way dedication for Stevens Avenue will not be required per City Council Resolution No. 77-7. 2. Jn$t~ll/t~f~/~n~/s~tt~f/t~/tjti/~t~n~~f~t/~n~/$p~tjfjt~tj~nt/l~/f~~t/ff~~ itt~~t/t~nt~fljn~/.//~~~pt~/$tf~~t/wj~t~/~~I/~~/~ll~w~~/jf/~~n~f~)/"~n/ ~~~n~~~nt/~~t~/jt/~~~pt~~/. DELETED. 3. ~~nttt~tt/~/f~~t/tj~~~~l~/t~/~jtl/~t~n~~t~t/~n~/tp~tjfjt~tj~n$/~~n~t~nt t~/t~t~/~n/~t~*~nt/~*~n~~/. DELETED. 4. ~~n$tt~tt/~$p~~lt/p~*jng/t~/tjti/~t6n~6t~t/6n~/tp~tjfjt6tj~nt/ft~~/t~nt~tf 7in~/t~/t~f~/ljn~/tl/.J/./F/~/.~J/. DELETED. 5. Provide soils report to include street design to City Engineer. 6. Provide Grading Plan and Certificate of Survey to City Engineer. ... 7. ,t~'/Jj ~~/ttf~~t/lj n~t!t~/'Uti/tp~U fU~tJ.~M/. DELETED. 8. Pl~nt/f~t/~ffftjt~/w~f~/t~~ll/~~/pt~p~t~~/~#/~/tj*jl/~nnjn~~t/. DELETED. 9. Provide sanitary sewer service as approved by the City, the County Health Department and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Minutes of Design Review Board December 20, 1983 Pa ge 7 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE - 16664 STEVENS AVENUE - WILFRID ATKINSON CONTINUED 10. Provide to the City a water availability letter from serving agency. - - 11. Provide written assurance that the County Fire Department requirements (to include fire protection and fire hydrant locations) have been compl i ed with. 12. Pay Capital Improvement Fees: Street $ .03 per square foot of lot area Storm Drain $ .02 per square foot of lot area Park $ .10 per square foot of building area Sewer $420.00 per residential unit 13. Pay Public Sa fety Fees: Police Fi re $250.00 - $100.00 TOTAL $350.00 per residential unit 14. Provide street trees. There being no further business, the Lake Elsinore Design Review Board adjourned - at 10:56 P.M. Motion by Commissioner Barnhart, second by Commissioner Washburn. Approved 5-0 Approved, Whit Steed Chai rman Res~,ectfully SU~1:~ed, q.~ fiJhdf Linda Gri nds ta ff ~.. V Planning Commission S ec reta ry