HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/12/2005 PSAC Reports
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 12,2005
6:00 P.M.
CULTURAL CENTER
CALL TO ORDER
ROLLCALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PUBLIC COMMENTS -NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS - 3 MINUTES
(please read and complete a Speaker's Form at the Podium, prior to the Start of the
Public Safety Advisory Commission Meeting).
PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS - 3 MINUTES
(please read and complete a Speaker's Form at the Podium, prior to the start ofthe Public
Safety Advisory Commission Meeting).
CONSENT ITEMS
(All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved on one motion, unless a Commission
Member or a member of the public requests a separate action on a specific item).
1. Minutes
A) Public Safety Advisory Commission - November 10, 2004
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
BUSINESS ITEMS
-1'1. Public Safety Advisory Commission Brochure Update (Mark Dennis - Verbal)
RECOMMENDATION:
Discuss and File
-22. Supplemental Engineering and Economic Feasibility Report for Rehabilitation of
Boat Launch Facility
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Staff Recommendation and Forward to
City Council
MINUTES
/""'
PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
183 NORTH MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2004
*************************************************************
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Uhlry called the Public Safety Advisory Commission Meeting to
order at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
COMMISSIONERS: ARNOLD, HEWISON,
KNIGHT, UHLRY
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS: LEWIS
~
Also present were: Chief of Police Fetherolf, and Clerk of the Board Ray.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Arnold.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
CONSENT ITEMS
MOVED BY HEWISON, SECONDED BY KNIGHT AND CARRIED BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE
CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED.
1. The following Minutes were received and ordered filed:
,.....
a.
Public Safety Advisory Commission - October 13,2004.
reo. I A
I (' 0- ---,
Pt2~E-L--- -;'>.~ f
,-!age Two - Public Safety Advisory Commission Minutes - November 10, 2004
~
~
BUSINESS ITEMS
21. Citizen Volunteer Safety Patrol.
Chairman Uhlry introduced the item. Police Chief Fetherolf gave an
overview of the item. He gave some background information on the Harvest
Valley Citizens Patrol, which was a private entity that worked throughout
Riverside County. He introduced Harvest Valley Citizens Patrol President
Robert Gibbons.
Mr. Gibbons, Harvest Valley Citizens Patrol President, thanked the
Commission for allowing him to give the presentation. He gave the history
of the formation of the Citizen Patrol. He indicated that one of the main
issues of forming the organization was due to the fact of not being able to
get the Sheriffs Department to their location when needed. He indicated
that the vehicles were donated by the Sheriff s Department. He indicated
that presently there were 162 members, 58 that were Sheriff trained and
qualified to drive a patrol car to do what was necessary to help the
community. He indicated that the Citizen Patrol help in other areas such as
blocking off crowds at crime scenes or traffic accidents. He indicated that
they were also utilized to help the Fire Department. He indicated that they
were an asset to the community. Mr. Gibbons indicated that he had never
been in law enforcement. He also indicated that he would be willing to help
organize a Citizen Patrol for Lake Elsinore. He noted that he wrote the
by-laws and the Operations Manual for the Harvest Valley Citizens Patrol.
He indicated that each qualified individual must go through a Sheriff
background check.
Commissioner Arnold inquired about some of the problems that initiated the
need for a Citizen Patrol. Mr. Gibbons indicated that speeding along
Highway 74 was an issue. He further indicated that there were a lot of drug
related issues in their community. He also indicated that the Citizen Patrol
could be a witness but could not get involved; and he stressed that was
something that each volunteer needed to understand. He indicated that they
did not carry any type of weapon. He indicated that was the reason for
uniformed Sheriff Deputies. He indicated that they have a set phone number
e'$::[;L'D;~ rr~~~i r",o.-, ,4-
~.::t,...~ 2- t'\1l: -J
r'r'&v~ V~" -1.
Page Three - Public Safety Advisory Commission Minutes - November 10,
~
that allowed them to have communication with a Deputy right away. He
indicated that they were covered under worker's compensation. He gave an
overview of the daily functions which involved a driver passenger
combination and a Watch Commander. He indicated that the patrol was
required to report to the Watch Commander every half hour. He indicated
that they document unsafe homes and code enforcement issues. He further
indicated that they take pictures of these issues and turn them over to Code
Enforcement. He indicated that they have a form for families that go on
vacations to complete and turn in to the Citizens Patrol. He noted the patrol
monitor the home until the family returns from vacation. He advised that
they were the eyes and ears of the Sheriff s Department and they were not to
get involved.
,-...
Commissioner Hewison questioned if there was an optimum population
range when a community should consider a citizen patrol. Mr. Gibbons
indicated they patrolled 45 square miles before including Nuevo, now with
Nuevo it was an additional 15 square miles. He indicated that there was
discussion of including Winchester. He indicated that Nuevo has there own
patrol, but was umbrellaed under Harvest Valley. +"'0-,,,"",
/
Mr. Gibbons indicated that the cars were provided by the Sheriff
Department.
~-;.\..Q..
Chairman Uhlry inquired about the population of the 45 square ~ area
currently being patrolled. Mr. Gibbons indicated that the Harvest Valley
population was approximately 10,000 to 12,000; and Nuevo was
approximately 2,800 in population. He indicated that the growth in the
Harvest Valley area was going to be tremendous next year.
/'"
/""'"
Police Chief Fetherolf questioned the funding source. Mr. Gibbons
indicated that when the County asked his organization to pick up Nuevo and
Winchester, he inquired about a funding source. He indicated that the
Citizens Patrol pays for the gas, maintenance and painting of the vehicles.
He indicated that he was told the organization would receive a grant. He
further indicated that the organization applied for the grant and received a
$10,000 (CDBG) grant from the County. He indicated that they have
~iiI:~tIDA m:~3 NO.
PAQE 3
JA
Oft
Page Four - Public Safety Advisory Commission Minutes - November 10,2004
r'
conducted yard sales and Bingo. He indicated that the organization paid for
all radios in the vehicles and the monthly bill. He indicated that the Sheriff's
Department paid for the insurance on the vehicles. Police Chief Fetherolf
inquired if there was a certification for training. Mr. Gibbons indicated that
they were required to give 40 hours of training to every volunteer, not
including CPR and first aid. He indicated that they provided their own
classes for CPR and first aid certification. He indicated that the initial
training was provided by the Sheriff's Department; and now the training was
conducted internally. He indicated liability insurance was covered for the
board members; and the others were paid for through the Sheriff's
Department. Mr. Gibbons reiterated that this was an all volunteer
organization. Police Chief Fetherolf questioned the accessibility of Sheriff
Facilities. Mr. Gibbons advised they did not have access to those facilities.
~
Chairman Uhlry inquired who determined the areas that needed to be
patrolled. Mr. Gibbons indicated that the current requirement was to cover
every area the vehicle could go into.
Commissioner Arnold questioned if there were other groups that existed in
the area and if so, what kind of coordination was in place to deal with
territorial issues. Mr. Gibbons indicated that there was a good
communication level that existed among the organizations.
Commissioner Hewison inquired if it was an on call system or shift system.
Mr. Gibbons indicated that it was shift system.
Commissioner Arnold inquired if there were HAM operators on the patrol
staff. Mr. Gibbons confirmed there were.
r'
Police Chief Fetherolf inquired if there was any oversight provided by the
Sheriff's Department. Mr. Gibbons indicated there was none. Chief
Fetherolf inquired about the organizations role in regards to the disaster
preparedness response. Mr. Gibbons indicated that his organization had
been instructed by the Fire Department and Police Department on what they
would be requested to do and how. Chief Fetherolf inquired if the
organization had participated in any DRT training with the Fire Department
~'" r.j,.O l ~
.,..",.:/'J' n".,;~J~ ". .-------~--""
F..,,':... J,....l?\ ~oilt
~~.-... .. w
~G~
Page Five - Public Safety Advisory Commission Minutes - November 10, 2004
,-..
or Sheriffs Department. Mr. Gibbons indicated they had not at this time,
but anticipated doing so in the future. Commissioner Arnold inquired if
anyone in the organization had been to the California Specialized Training
Institute or worked with hazmat. Mr. Gibbons indicated not that he was
aware of.
",-...
Chairman Uhlry deferred to the Commission to offer suggestions for
direction to Police Chief Fetherolf. Commissioner Hewison suggested a
Study Session. Police Chief Fetherolf indicated that historically policing the
1960's, 1970's, and 1980's police departments typically were not interested
in what the public thought. He indicated their relationship with the public
was strained at best and not very productive. He indicated with the
introduction of the community policing concept starting in the early 80's,
police departments had become more open. He indicated that more eyes and
ears were needed in the community, but they did not need individuals trying
to be Police Officers when they were not. He indicated if a group was
formed then there would need to be a very strict oversight of that group by
some entity.
Chairman Uhlry indicated that the Sheriff s Posse was an organized
volunteer group in the Sheriffs Department; and that they wore the same
uniforms as a Sheriff s, but he did not envision the Citizens Patrol wearing a
Sheriff uniform. He inquired if Police Chief Fetherolf had envisioned an
organization similar as far as control of activities. Chief Fetherolf indicated
he preferred the model Mr. Gibbons patrol was structured under, because
they were identified with the Sheriffs Department by virtue of their patch;
and it was in the best interest of the City to keep the Citizens Patrol separate
from the Police/Sheriff Department.
The Commission agreed unanimously to have a Study Session, at 1 :30 p.m.,
Tuesday, November 30,2004, at the Sheriffs Station in the Community
Room.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
~ None.
~,l'."')}""i,; rITr'Jl rw. I A
~."""''';;~<Gl1 . S- Of 7 .,.
/"'"
Page Six - Public Safety"Advisory Commission Minutes-November 10,2004
CHIEF OF POLICE COMMENTS
Police Chief Fetherolf commented on the tour of the Lake given to Commissioner
Arnold.
COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS
Commissioner Hewison commented that December was the completion of the six
months in which the Commission would submit a report to Council and
suggested using the December meeting to prepare a report; and give a
presentation at the first January Council Meeting.
Commissioner Arnold commented that he had inquired about business cards at
City Hall. He indicated that he spoke with City Manager Watenpaugh and was
told that he would put a request into the Mayor to consider the issue. .
~
"Commissioner Knight commented that he would be out of town for the January
meeting.
Chairman Uhlry commented that the issue with the expert on the Lake was to be
brought back in 30 days and now it was 120 days, but staff was not present to
comment. He indicated that he would pursue the issue. Commissioner Hewison
indicated that it would be good to get a monthly update on the items. Chairman
Uhlry indicated that he did speak with Information/Communications Manager
Dennis regarding the brochure. He indicated that Council had just approved the
new computer which was essentially the brain for City Hall's computer system
and he was waiting for that to be installed. He indicated Mr. Dennis would bring
something back at the December meeting. Chairman Uhlry indicated that he
had been getting some complaints about speeding on Heald Street between
Limited Avenue and Chaney Street. Police Chief Fetherolf indicated that the
radar trailer was in the location today.
~
~;~!&:~ t"reM f~O.
p.~~ ~
fA
Of. 7
Page Seven - Public Safety Advisory Commission Minutes - November 10, 2004
,,-.....
ADJOURNMENT
THE PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING WAS
ADJOURNED AT 8:00 P.M.
DANIEL UHLRY, CHAIRMAN
PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION
Respectfully submitted,
,..--.
FREDERICK RAY
CLERK OF THE BOARD
ATTEST:
VICKI KASAD, CMC, CITY CLERK!
HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
~
~~~ rF~ rlto.
PIal
/A
OJ 7
~
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
REPORT TO
PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION
TO:
HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS
FROM:
RICHARD WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER
DATE:
JANUARY 12,2005
SUBJECT:
PSAC INFORMATION BROCHURE PRINTING
BACKGROUND
Publication of a general information brochure outlining the purpose and duties of the PSAC,
including public safety contact information for the City, was directed by the Commission last
May (2004).
DISCUSSION
Design of the general information brochure will be complete following designation of2005
~ officers. A new PSAC web page on the City's web site is being developed concurrently with the
brochure publication. Both a downloadable version (pdf format) and point source distribution
(City Hall, Senior Center, LEVCC, public library, Cultural Center, etc.) are proposed distribution
channels for the PSAC brochure.
FISCAL IMPACT
The total cost for design and printing 7,000 pieces in four color process is $3,380. Less design
services and sales tax, the unit cost of printing is $0.35 per brochure. Sufficient funding for this
project is available in the Committee/Commission's supporting budget.
RECOMMENDATION
Direct staff to revise officers' information and print final version of the Public Safety Advisory
Commission brochure.
PREPARED BY: MARK E. DENNIS
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA LISTING:
c ~~~;: f~n~~g~~l~~~r ~ j tJ
~
- P~)._~J____
,,"_o.~,"' J .t..~.':'..:C'....3'
,....~..:z: _ .
~- --...-
~
OOoOag>O:;1f
a1:gog@ar8<1><
:J=3:J -1"0-01
o om-<-.cn
s: 0 2, = (/) )> 0. )>.
<I> O"(/)"'D:J0.0 O:J
<I> <I> ~, 0 0 <:J '"
-+ 0 - .... -. 0 0
S'(/):J O' <I> 0 <I> o.
(Q ~)>-< s:.... ~:J c:
-+"""' z -< .0.1
,..... -. v C 0 =+ c..
OO"'OC:J :::To
~:J Q.3 0'0 OCit .
. o(/):J 0" -0' 3 :::T -.
--+m030Cit
-+ 3 - -'"'0 0"
:::T<I>"'o~-+-c
<I>:J 8 -, <I> (/)
-+- 0 0 -. _.
O~o,0.3tv~
OO)>SDOA~
==h :J 0 - 0- _.
o 0. -'-+'"'-:J
.... ~:::T-o
2. <I> C
o 0'
0'
/""
~
...,
~
~
a- g, 0 I..~..
.... 0
ol3
(/)03
~ -< ~.
o <I> -.
:J 0 0
0.....:J
sn <I>
<D"o~
.... :J (/)
3 0. ~
. 0 <
o <I>
:J 0
0'"'0
<1>"'0
.... 0
(I) -.
o~
"'0<1>
"'00.
0-+
-'<1>
:J ....
<D"3
Q.(/)
-+ -.
o :J
~ (/)a-
~ a-3....~
;E 30=+
Q =+=0
i<Dog~
!.~~3~
!!!. <I> :J <I> 0"
::::I~=<I>
QO'~S=~
!D....",o(Q(I)
03c3a-
ca' 0"_.....
...... =:J~
~ ~~t)
o arsn
~Q
U> .
:T::T!
Qa
ro..+
;:) ~r
~<l>
.....0
<l> :T
... 0
3 -. _
~ 3 ~
:TO
-. ;:)
() 0
:T;:)
<l> 0.
x <
"0 _.
:;' ()
<l> <l>
o I
;:)0
:T
;;0 Q.
(;.;3
-'0
.......;:)
~:T
. 0
~
s:
<I>
$.
5'
(Q
(/)
o
<D
~~
~ 0
-+
o
-+-
:::T
<I>
"'0
c
0"
O'
....... :lIQ
-0
.:::::<
~~
16
.......:r
--
......
....... CD .......:lIQ
"::::; == - 0
_> ':::::::::::J
~... ~%
1 ~ 11
....... 0. .......-.
- -8
.:::::: ':::::s
~ ~
.......~
.......... -*'
......0
05
A.
1_
~i
...... ~.
o iiir
(}'1 ..
.......0
"::::;0
_:::::J
0-'
A!.
lr
.......c
"::::;,
- -:'
~~
o
::r
Q.
~
::::I
..
5"
^
-<I>
(X)m
c.u _
(/)
Z -.
o g
::+....<IlIf
:r<l>c:
s:Of
oc",
5' c m
....
~o
<Do
CD CD
-+:::J
-+-
CD
....
0-
o.
o:J"
"'Om
. :s
3
"3~
::r CD
mCD-o
~ CD C
;;ICitO"
0<1>=
:s < 0
!f<l>cn
c-<Q,
:J III <I>
<I> II ~
~S)>
0:SQ.
-a.<
:::T --
CD <IlIf (/)
~.I~
~:sO
"'0=0
o a. 3
~.3
CD ~ ~'
Q. 0 -.
. ..... 0
:J
n
a=
51.
~
5
,.,
-
en
-.
=
o
ft1
(1'''
n:l>3> i
o c ~ !:
:I :s ... n
:I ~ -<
iii ~
(It
-
o
z
~ImiNO. c;>j
~C~
1"""
r--
s:~o)>
o -. :J ~
:J:-Yo.c:n
00--
(Q (j;' g :-Y
COOOCO
3~-0
CO CO -0 -.
:J~c,:<
_"'OM'"
,. ~ ~ 0
CO -"
-000
o(l)c
.... 0 :J
CO CD 0
0..:<::-
:J 0
CO -0 -'
~a.:<
0<6's:
:J ~ 0
a. -. :J
ogo
~. 0 (Q
~. c:n m
/"'"
"
-00
(J"l-
-,:.1'
. 0
0--
-....1<<>
J:::,.U>
. ......
(J"l::Q
-'0
-....10
00.
III
:'1
O'(i)(i)^'
~()(Q<D
ooc-o
o 3 - 0
:J Q=+
~. 3 0" 0-+
a.co
co:J@-+
a a. (j;" ffi
-00
-. - 0
o -' :J
:J 0 a. -.
,.:J .:<
(1)0'
o~g
:-yoc
<D ~ :J
0.0
00=
-. - 0
-<-:J
o~o
gf)
:J
Q.
-og;
(J"lQ
-'::::II:
0.:;:
""-J;:o
~<<>
~3
-....10
0<
o
()
o
-00..
(J"l<<>
-'
. m
0-::1
-....I ....
J:::,.o
WO
-'(t)
1\.)3
J:::,.<<>
='
-
"'V
en
or;
<-
-0,,3
(J"l;:lllla"
-'0....
0."'3
-....100
J:::,.CS :=
W....o
-'q;3
~oo
ag
OS'
CD (')
:"'!"
",
CO 0 0"'"
3(Q=::r
OCO<D
-0 -. (Q .....
- :J 0 v
o (I) _ (/))>
-< -+ -"
<D -0 0 ()
<D :J
(I) C (I) -.
0" (I)
O=O:J
-O~o
-+(1)0-+
::ro::ro
co _ 0
OCD....::r
_.-<~ <D
';<O(l)Q
::t 0 S"
o -(Q
<D 3
.... _.0"
(I) (I) 0
o 0 0
.... 0 ~
0:J0.
-+a.a'
ffic~
....u
00m:r:zm03~
:J 0 ~. 0 <D ~. =1= 0 '"
a. ~ :J 3 <0' ::l "< -. w
o:3Q<D::rQoa"
:-yo<D 0 0"<D((3 Q.g
co~o~Qs:o:J-+
@ :J ::r ;;;! ::r 0 :2. 0 0
'. 0 wON a.
s: Cil 0 5' 0 Q; a.
<D3,o.co::::!:0=+
....0")> 0--'
()<D(I)~(,!):JOO
::r .... (1)0 0 ([) (I) (Q :J
00 _o-.co
~ Oo~:JII\-
-' _ -. () 0 W -.
Cito9..::r:y-~:J
)> 0 o' (j) 0 B. =+ -g
~ 3:J....:J _.::r_
o 3 Y' g o.c5 a 0
Q. ([) or- -0 ^' - ~ o.:J
o () "Y' <D ::ro'
::::!:CO<D (I)<Dc
0, gr-(I)
?:-y <Do
<D '~
()
~'8 r-
, ::l 0
"'!"!'"
-. <<> (t)
*~m
'" (ii"
~'<O5'
_4'>0
-0 ::t ::I ==,.
(J"l . (') '"
-':t: '< ""Q
;-v 0 "-a
....c....._
...... U> (l) ......
(J"l :,r-' 0
W(Q (Q <D
~. ~(;)
06"0:.1'
^"",,<<>
(fl .:.1' ::;:.
,,8=s
o 0. (l>
::::r<0
o <; <D
::-0'0
<Do:"""
-:::r
() .
..:....,
"
Q.
n'
<<>
......
~
a
......
3
'Ii
Cl
o'
-00
...,,-
-'('()
3
CD
ii
(I)
='
()
ai'
III
a
::l
-<
00 0.0'0-0 o-'s:o.....
<o(j;'oooo:::::ooffi
mao=c=3O-....3
~a:~o?S~3" 9-35"
::r <D -. - -. .... -. ::J. -0 -. ^
()" ~. 0 S' 0 <D ~ <D' ~ <D
::r (Q:J :J (Q :J 8 o' 0 I\.) o' m
_ 00 3:J 8:J(I)
::r-o:Jo-g ~aJ:::,.~:J
<D c-o 3 0"3 =+S'c a Q
00"c3=<D::r0:J(I)<D
=f o' ~ c ~ a 3 :Jo ~ (i) "U
"<(I)o:Jooo WI C
00 -. 3: <D~<DO"
o - a -< <6' o' 2S: - 0 ~ =
c ~ ..,.." -. -< :J :J 0 =t= a 0
:J -< CD :J _. (/) (Q ~ "< 0" (/)
o-o-<-g~-o(l)O=a
=0 (j;'-C 0 o.-+~ 3-<D
::r=(I)o",-<::ro.",-
o c ~::r (j;' <D -. W -<
~-<<D:J' coo 60.)>
o3Y'0. 0-< :JOo.
000 -. o:J<
a:::t::J -< <D~"
a<Do. z ....
:-@ 9 -<
c
.
-00-00
a3:o(i)
$. ~ CQ a
o.:JW-
=i' _. 0 <D
<<5:J::lo
o -g :-Y :Ja.
O=-+-<D
338Q~
c 3 -< S'
:2. -0 (I)' 0
-< a ~ S'
.....:Jcoo
~ ::: 0" :J
w .... (I)
0.0=+-
O"O<Da
o 2S:O'm
O:J....:J
~cp 0 ~
a :J
:J=
a.~
(")Ul-4
ca.=-
Ii: tI CD
g~"
-. en
:-;.
.,.S(")
Ii: !!!l CD
c:r->e
~:J ;.
5.1ft
'CAtS'
5.f:J
-. :I At
UlUl~
.: .... CD
CDo1
g!fc:r
:JCD:
CD (") (")
-a:
0-)>
:Joo
0.0-+
f./J c a
(D (Q (I)
<: 3 S'
<D<Da.
_:JCD
:y--o
<D~CD
-oo:J
c=lla.
0" (I)' <D
0'<D a
'. ::t $
o CD
=+-<
(I) <D
0(1)
o
-O:J
ao.
-+<D
CD a
o ....
-+ (I)
~
>~
. ;::r
ltI
g-g.-g 3~m~"'O
::t :J 0" CD 0" -. a en
CDO ::. 0-' (Q.... ()" g. 0" )10
:J :J -. (')
9-Q'3~~Cit~fIt
"3CDO-OOltl
<D-<CD:J ..,
9..S:(/)-:<a.8;
o' (Q moO" :J (I!
:J Y' S. 0 c e- S-
a -+0 a.~._..
:J::rCDCD:J-+
0. CD "'Om<DO
O~~~-
o . 0 :;:h CD S'
O~<6'O(l)""",
3 (I)' ~ () -+ Q
3 _. co 0 3
c~g3:-Yo
:JM'"OCOCD::::!:
-. v - :J =i' 0
-<(1)(/)-+ :J
=+ C 0 _
~ S' :J a
(Qo. 3
n
~.
to
.
~
!#Ii
3 S:O"O 0::J.
OC-<o.O"CD
-=. :J <D a. 0
o-'x3:<o
~. Q. "0 o' <D 0
.:t-oo:J03
<0:Joo3
o 0.--+
-+ 0 -. 0. <' -.
<Do:Jc=+~.
a. (Q - -. 0
9- CD (/) ar m :J
-+' CD (I)' _'
::r(l)OoO"(I)
<D 5- 0 :J S. 3'
o~. :J 0. 3 -.
-' \11 .... -+
-<OI'VCDO<D
- b.. (I) -< a.
o 0 0- -00 (I) -+
o CD 0
co9-a<D-+
:J ::i: -. ^ ::r
o ,;;}'O" <D
:;-. CD~
Cir
(I)
x
C)
)>00
O:Jo
::to.:J
o IT 52.
:J('DQ.
"'O:J('D
o <D ....
-+~o
6Cit:J
:-00.
-<D
Q a
~ c
::t8..
:J co
(0-
o::r
OCD
_.0
::::!:o
~~
::l
:J -0 (I) )>
<Do"" 00
<D c-+
0. (Q 0 <'
(I) a ('D CD
0'3(1)-<
.... (I) 0' (I)
-iJ .... <D
7l....-o<D
\\IOc^
0..... 0" (Q
CD _ ....
-. 0 -" 0
-<-+o:J
O~a(ij
- -
o5.PrQ
"CD"< 0
co.o~:-Y
!:!!c~<D
(/) -. 0 ....
--"O-+-_
:J3CDc
~CDo.6.
,.:J -
-+ :J
(Q
~ J1'Sj NO.
PAGE ~ "3
(I)'
~,(
Of ~3
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
REPORT TO
PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION
~
TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS
FROM: RICHARD WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER
DATE: JANUARY 12, 2005
SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL ENGINEERING & ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY
REPORT FOR REHABILITATION OF BOAT LAUNCH FACILITY
BACKGROUND
The boat launch facility at the City's Campground was originally constructed in the late 1960s
and is in need of rehabilitation. In April-2002, the City prepared a feasibility report and
applied for grant funding from the California Department of Boating & Waterways, in the
amount of $3,916,465. The City received approval from the Department of Boating &
Waterways for a $3,000,000 Multi-Year Grant to rehabilitate the boat launch facility. The
City would be financially responsible for any additional costs above the grant amount to
complete the project.
Under the current configuration ofthe Campground's shoreline as developed by the State of
California, the boat launch, peninsula and marina are submerged above an elevation of 1,240'
~ (MSL) Mean Sea Level. When the lake is above 1,240'MSL, the even surface water level may
be misperceived by some to include a uniform bottom contour. However, adjacent to the
peninsula is a deep boating channel, which has been a hazard for wayward waders.
The grant to rehabilitate the boat launch does not include improvements to the peninsula and
marina of the LERA Campground.
DISCUSSION
To increase operational safety of the facility utilizing a cost-effective design, the PSAC
recommended additional analysis of four alternative plans to rehabilitate the peninsula in
conjunction with the renovations to the boat launch facility. The City contracted with Noble
Consultants Inc. to prepare a supplemental to the original feasibility report to include analysis
of the four alternative plans listed below.
1. Eliminate the Peninsula and Breakwater.
2. Floating Dock Breakwater System.
3. Ascending Riprap Breakwater (Berm).
4. Elevated Bolder Breakwater (Jetty).
~
The results of Noble Consultants engineering and economic analysis is the selection of
Alternative Plan 2. This cost-effective design was selected based upon safeguarding shoreline
users, as well as the protection and functionality provided by the floating dock-breakwater
system.
P~:.tii~t~A ITEM IW.
f4,,{,A: J
L...L-
0$-1 Y
~
,--
~
FISCAL IMPACT
The total estimated cost to implement Alternative Plan 2 ranges from $4,891,600 to
$5,213,600. Therefore, the City's share of the total project cost ranges from $1,891,600 to
$2,213,600.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve implementation of Alternative Plan 2 to rehabilitate the boat launch facility and
adjacent peninsula.
PREPARED BY: Pat Kilroy, Director of Lake & Aquatic Resources Department
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA LISTING:
. ~CJ)~j
Richard J. Watenpaugh, City M ag
;~::E;ct:l.A ma~ Fro.
Pfw L.
22-
Of l~
~
NOBLE
c 9 N S U L 1 A N 18, IN C -
.
December 3, 2004
731-12
Mr. Pat Kilroy
Director, Lake & Aquatic Resources Department
City of Lake Elsinore
130 S. Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
RE: Supplement to: Engineering & Economic Feasibility Report for Lake Elsinore
Campground Boat Launching Facility Improvements (April 2002).
Dear Mr. Kilroy:
Weare pleased to submit this supplement report that provides additional engineering and
economic analysis to evaluate lower cost alternatives for the rehabilitation of the boat launch
facility and peninsula at the Lake Elsinore Campground Boat Launching Facility. This report
supplements our April 2002 Engineering & Economic Feasibility Report, as agreed to in the
,.....-.. Agreement for Professional Services with the City of Lake Elsinore that we received on October
25, 2004. The purpose of this supplement analysis is to enhance the operational safety of the
Lake Elsinore shoreline in conjunction with the future boat launching ramp improvements. The
recommended supplement improvements expand the project area to the southwest side of the
boat launching facility by including earthwork shoreline modifications to the existing peninsula
breakwater and alternative improvements along the southwestern edge of the boat launching
ramp (Figure 1). They address the following two objectives:
1. Either eliminate or barricade abrupt vertical grade changes, which could be potentially
hazardous to recreational lake users. Generally, reducing the peninsula, which currently
acts as a breakwater to the launch ramp, improves the uniformity of the shoreline.
2. To the extent practicable, provide waterfront protection to the boat launch ramp without
compromising water safety for recreational users.
Four conceptual plans were compiled to satisfy these objectives in varying degrees and, to the
extent possible, within the range of the project budget. Noble Consultants Inc. (NCI) performed
cursory engineering and economic assessment evaluations for each of the four alternatives. The
two highest-ranking alternatives were then to be re-examined more thoroughly to select a
preferred alternative. However, the initial selection was complicated by subjective differences
between alternatives. Therefore, to make certain that each alternative could be fully understood
before making a selection, a full analysis of each alternative was determined to be more
beneficial. Based on cost comparisons as well as operational safety, functional and durability
~
NOV"TO: 3'59 BEL MARIN Ii\; EYS HIND. StlITE '}. NO\iAf(). CA '14949.5(,37 (.jl'>) illY! .tr:' 2: fAX I ~ r,>) !i&l.cr735
IRI,1NE: 22H J nt')'ONT DR.. SI'IYE <,.m. IRVINE O. ')2612. ''i4l9 (<)49) 7"Z.1 "iJO fi....X (<)w) 7"2 .1l.'!!!1
SAN OlEGO: 'HUt OAKDOlJRNE RfLSA:'IlTEE.CA 9211'71.2.\1., (M9) Wi>..,,,tn l-XX (M9) 448';1022
llnp:II'i\v.....''.llOblt<consulliluls..com
~;;:;:a:x:fM mas Pro.
PACE.3
2,2-
Of JY
l>&.
NOBLE CONSULTANTS, INC.
Mr. Pat Kilroy
/'""' City of Lake Elsinore
Campground Boat Launching Facility Improvements
December 3, 2004
Page 2 of?
criteria, NCI selected the most favorable improvement plan and provided recommendations for
its implementation. This report highlights the functional and cost characteristics identified by
NCI for each alternative.
The four alternative plans considered in this Supplement report are as follows:
1. Eliminate the Peninsula and Breakwater. This plan calls for the elimination of the
existing peninsula breakwater along the west side of the boating channel and smoothing
the contours uniformly along the shoreline west of the boat launch, in both a north to
south direction and a west to east direction (Figure 2).
2. Floating Dock System. This plan calls for reducing the peninsula until it is equal with
the existing line of the marina basin's outer breakwater (sand spit), and substituting the
west most launch ramp boarding dock with a more substantial, and longer, pile anchored
floating dock system to serve as a breakwater barrier. Since this alternative does not
completely barricade the shoreline along the launch ramp's west side, grade contours will
be uniformly smoothed to eliminate abrupt slope changes along the shoreline (Figu~e 3).
,.......... 3. Ascending Riprap Breakwater (Berm). This plan also calls for reducing the peninsula
as described in Plan 2, and constructing a new rubble mound breakwater, consisting of a
5-foot tall riprap berm, along the west side of the boat launching ramp. In addition, the
shoreline west of the boat launch will be graded to provide a gentle natural beach slope
extending into the lake. The riprap berm will serve as a barricade near the abrupt grade
changes along the western edge of the launch ramp when traveling from west to east
(Figure 4).
4. Elevated Bolder Breakwater (Jetty). This plan also calls for reduction to the peninsula
as described in Plan 2, and constructing a rubble mound breakwater, or jetty, consisting
of large riprap armor with a crown elevation of 1,256 feet MSL over a sand core along
the west side of the launch ramp. This jetty will also serve as a barricade near the abrupt
grade changes along the western edge of the launch ramp (Figure 5).
The engineering and economic analysis of the above alternatives is consistent with the following
conditions and conclusions:
~ The proposed boat launching facility improvements shown in the April 2002 report,
which consist of a six-lane boat launching ramp and sanitation pumpout system; a
car/boat trailer parking lot with 288 spaces; a launch ramp apron and staging area with a
boat wash down area; a service area with employee and handicap parking; and a restroom
building and fish cleaning station with landscaping, picnic area and lighting, all remain
unchanged. These improvements are described under Section 5.2 Site Facilities (pages
21 through 23) of the April 2002 report, and are illustrated in Figure 7 of that report.
I'"
~mMf. Of L/~
NOBLE CONSULTANTS, INC.
~
Mr. Pat Kilroy
City of Lake Elsinore
Campground Boat Launching Facility Improvements
December 3, 2004
Page 3 of7
~ With the exception of Alternative Plan 2, the three boarding floats between the lanes of
the boat-launching ramp remain unchanged. In Alternative 2, the originally proposed 8 ft
x 100 ft boarding dock nearest the west edge of the ramp will be replaced by a 8 ft x 425
ft boarding dock, secured in place by piling. For maximum benefit in providing
breakwater protection to the boat-launching ramp, the dock would be placed along the
western edge of the launch ramp. However, in that configuration there will be three boat-
launching lanes between the first two boarding docks as shown in Figure 3.
~ For the purpose of determining excavation quantities, the four alternative plans can be
categorized into two groups. The first group, representing elimination of the peninsula, is
compatible with Alternative Plan 1 (Figure 2). The second group represents reduction of
the peninsula, and with some variation, is compatible with Alternative Plans 2, 3 and 4.
~
~ In all cases, the overall fill requirement for the project exceeds the excavated material
available from either elimination or partial elimination of the peninsula breakwater.
Either imported fill or dredging within the existing marina basin will be used to makeup
any shortfall in backfill requirements. The project's site fill requirements are based on the
115,000 cubic yards presented in the April 2002 Engineering & Economic Feasibility
Report. This material will come from the following three sources:
o Peninsula excavation (Alternative Plans 1 through 4)
o Marina basin dredging
o Imported material
The estimated quantity of material available from the peninsula breakwater area for each
of the four alternatives evaluated, as well as the remainder of fill required from either
marina basin dredging or importing is as follows:
Excavation and Backfill Quantitv ICY)
Peninsula Fill From Total
Fill Other Sources Fill
Eliminate Peninsula 70,600 44,400 115,000
(Alternative 1)
Reduce Peninsula 57,600 57,400 115,000
(Alternatives 2 & 3)
Reduce Peninsula 56,100 58,900 115,000
(Alternative 4)
/""'
~ Eliminating the peninsula (either complete or partial removal) provides between
approximately 56,000 CY and 70,600 CY of the required 115,000 CY total fill material
It;;}8~'D:li t7i!M NO. L 2-
PIa S- OF IlJ
NOBLE CONSULTANTS, INC.
/"""'
Mr. Pat Kilroy
City of Lake Elsinore
Campground Boat Launching Facility Improvements
December 3,2004
Page 4 on
to be used for the project. The remaining fill material, which is approximately 44,400
CY to 59,000 CY, would come from either marina basin dredging or imported from
offsite.
~ Alternative Plan 1 provides for the largest quantity of on-site fill material from removal
of the peninsula, but eliminates breakwater protection of the boat launching ramp and
future marina basin.
~ Alternative Plan 2, provides a floating dock breakwater and boat launching ramp
boarding float along the western boundary of the boat launching ramp, however floating
breakwaters are not as effective as landform breakwaters for shoreline protection, and do
not prevent the potential for silt to migrate into the boat launching ramp from a westerly
to easterly direction.
/"""'
~ Alternative Plans 3 and 4 involve the construction of either a rock riprap berm or a rock
riprap breakwater/jetty along the western side of the boat launching ramp that will extend
into the lake by a distance to be in line with the existing marina basin's outer submerged
spit. This berm or breakwater will be constructed over an existing peninsula after
removing needed fill material and grading the remaining peninsula in order to retain the
natural existing beach slope to the west of the boat launching ramp.
The April 2002 report was based on the import of all fill material, whereas this supplement
report is based on the dredging of lake sediments to provide all site fill material. The dredging
unit cost used in this analysis is 41 to 59 percent higher than the $11 per cubic yards used for the
import of fill and placement in the April 2002 report, however the dredging operation will insure
that the lake volume's capacity is not reduced. It is expected that cut material will consist of
granular sandy sediments, which needs to be verified with soil borings during the design process.
The dredging of sandy sediment should result in little change in the volume. of fill material
compared to the volume of dredged materials during the drying and compaction of these sandy
materials, however there could be some loss of material in the handling process. Therefore, a
dredged (cut) volume overage of approximately 12 percent is recommended to account for any
handling losses during the fill operation. This has been allowed for in the range of unit dredging
costs used within this analysis. However it is still important to verify the soil characteristics of
this dredge material during the design phase.
The construction cost, shown in Table 12 of the April 2002 report, is $2,800,000 (rounded) to
construct all of the boat launching ramp facility improvements identified in that report. The
largest single cost component for the project, earth fill, is directly related to the cost of
excavating material at the peninsula and marina basin. The fill material is located both above
and below water levels, which is dependent on the changing lake elevations. Therefore, either
r--- land based excavators and/or dredges would be utilized by the contractor to excavate at dry and
~~ tn;~i NO.
PAGE<P
2-2-
Of. IY
NOBLE CONSULTANTS, INC.
Mr. Pat Kilroy
~ City of Lake Elsinore
Campground Boat Launching Facility Improvements
'December 3, 2004
Page 5 of7
~
~
wet locations, which would depend on the lake elevation during construction and on the
experience and available equipment of the successful contractor.
Dredged material may need to be conditioned before it can be placed and compacted in fill areas,
which slows productivity and increases cost as compared to material excavated in the dry,
however the dredging of sandy materials that are allowed to freely drain during the placement
operation can significantly reduce the drying and compaction time. In order to account for the
potential fluctuation in cost of the project's fill that is influenced by lake levels, contractor
experience, equipment utilized, dredged fill handling/processing requirements, and final volume
of dredged fill required to meet the site's fill requirements, a range in unit cost of $15.50 to
$17.50 per cubic yard was used to allow for dredging, placement and compaction of the site's
fill. Construction costs for improvements of each Alternative Plan are tabulated below.
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Range for Lake Elsinore Alternative Plans 1 Through 4
Alternative Plan! Project Rock Floating Piling Total Non- Total
Description Fill Revetment DOCk!') Construction Construction Project
Quantity Cost Quantity Cost Cost Quantity Cost Subtotal cosf'l Cos!S') Cost
CY $ Tons $ SF $ LF $ $ $ $ $
High: ~l1"",""Y Low Range :;;:: Low Range ~=
Loaded Unit Cost>> Low: $15.5G'CY $6M"on $6CISF $4lIIJM;A HIghRII9l High Range
Alternative Plan 1 Low
8imlnate the Peninsula ~ $1783000 $1783000 $3.318000 $1 327 200 $4 645 200
and Breakwater. 115,000 $2,013,000 .na- -na- -na- .Ra- -Ra- -na- $2,013,000 $3,548,000 $1,419,200 $4,967,200
Range
Alternative Plan 2 Low
Floating Dock System. ~ 115,000 $1 783 000 3,400 $160,000 4 $16,000 $1959000 $3.494000 $1 397600 $4.891 600
High $2,013,000 -na- -na- $2,189,000 $3,724,000 $1,489,600 $5,213,600
Range
Alternative Plan 3 Low
Ascending Riprap ~ 115,000 $1783000 4,250 $255,000 $2038 000 $3 573 000 $1 429 200 $5.002200
Breakwater. $2,013,000 -na- -na- -na- -na- $2,268,000 $3,803,000 $1,521,200 $5,324,200
Range
Alternative Plan 4 Low $1519200 I $5 317.200
Elevated Bolder Jetty. ~ 115,000 $1783000 8,000 $480,000 $2263 000 $3 798 000
High $2,013,000 .Ra- -Ra- -na- -Ra- $2,493,000 $4,028,000 $1,611,200 $5,639,200
Range
!!Qill.;.
1. The floating dock cost includes a credit of $44,000 for eliminating one 8 11 x 100 11 boarding dock.
. Total construction cost includes $1,535,000 for adjusted Aprtl 2002 Report Construction Cost.
The adjusted April 2002 Report project cost is without project fill, computed as follows:
AdJusted ADrll 2002 Construc1lon Cost
Aprtl 2002 Report Construction Cost: 2,800,000
Credit for April 2002 FiU Cost: (1,265,000)
Adjusted Cost>> 1,535,000
3. Similar to the Aprtl 2002 Report, non-constructiOn costs are computed at 40% of construction cost;
10% of that amount is construction contingency.
~ ,rdJj NO.
wat
'2-2--
OF IY
NOBLE CONSULTANTS, INC.
~
Mr. Pat Kilroy
City of Lake Elsinore
Campground Boat Launching Facility Improvements
December 3, 2004
Page 6 of?
For cost purposes, the dredging equipment operation was based on using a portable barge and
either a Northwest 65D or Bacyrus Erie 88B for both the dredging and fill operations. These are
fairly common pieces of equipment, which are locally available. Based on typical production
rates for granular sandy materials, 3 months (13 weeks) would be estimated to complete the
dredge cut and fill operations based on using two machines.
Conclusions and Recommendations
In selecting the preferred Alternative Plan, consideration of both performance and cost measures
are of equal importance. Based on cost, the Alternatives Plans can be divided into two groups:
those that meet the project budget objective of $5,000,000 and those that exceed this budget
amount. Based on the above table that presents our opinion of probable construction cost,
Alternative Plan I is under the project budget of $5,000,000 and Alternative Plan 2 is considered
to just meet the project budget when taking the average of our estimated low and high range for
total project cost. In addition, the Alternative Plan 3 low range for total project cost also just
meets the project budget, whereas its high range, and both the low and high range of Alternative
Plan 4 exceed the project budget.
,--
Although Alternative Plan 1 may be the least costly of the four plans, without a breakwater, it
will not begin to provide the service potential of Alternative Plan 2, which provides a functional
floating breakwater over the full range of lake levels, and includes grading improvements to
enhance operational safety of the Lake Elsinore shoreline. Alternative Plan 3 provides a bottom
barrier near the abrupt grade changes along the western edge of the launch ramp for the safety of
lake users walking in a westerly to easterly direction, and also provides a barrier to bottom
sediments moving in an easterly direction, however at the higher lake levels it will be submerged
and therefore will provide minimum breakwater protection from easterly moving waves and
currents. Alternative Plan 4 provides excellent safety and breakwater protection under all lake
levels not exceeding elevation 1254 feet, however it easily exceeds the project budget and will be
the least aesthetically pleasing plan under the lower lake levels.
Based on the potential project costs and the operational safety considerations, as being the most
important criteria, our recommendation is to proceed with Alternative Plan 2. However, since
the most significant project cost is the site's fill, the potential exists that the final project cost
could be either at or lower than the low range cost during final design and construction bidding if
the several site fill construction factors discussed in this report are favorable. Therefore our
recommendation in the implementation of designing Alternative Plan 2 would be to design an
ascending riprap berm as described in Alternative Plan 3, as an optional added bid item to
Alternative Plan 2, with a berm height of 3 feet above the bottom instead of 5 feet above the
bottom. Then depending on what the final construction bid price is, this option could either be
accepted or rejected.
~.
~ rra.i NO.
PAGlZ
2-2-
Of. IY
NOBLE CONSULTANTS, INC.
Mr. Pat Kilroy
,........, City of Lake Elsinore
Campground Boat Launching Facility Improvements
December 3, 2004
Page 7 of7
We look forward to implementing the design phase of this important City project. Please call us
if you would like to discuss any aspects of this supplement report.
Sincerely,
NOBLE CONSULTANTS, INC.
Ronald M. Noble, P .E.
President
RMN/TJF/jl
Attachments: Figures 1 through 5
/""'
/""'
,~rras NO. L, 2-
PAGE Cf OF I If
LAKE ELSINORE
RECREATIONAL AREA
CAMPGROUND
i
/
(
I
I
i
!
I
!
I
I
g
)
~/
\
/
/
/ '
/
(
FUTURE RECREATIONAL MARINA
6 LANE LAUNCH RAMP
WITH 3 BOARDING FLOATS
GANGPLANK
8' x 1 DO' BOARDING FLOATS
(MOUNTED @ TOP OR
CENTER OF LAUNCH RAMP)
SAND PENINSULA
BREAKWATER
i
;
RESTROOM
I
J
(
I
,
~
i
i
/ )
I
~.._~...,.~
,..--. -:-._'~...\
. ;
}
SUPPLEMENT NO, 1
STUDY AREA (43 ACRES)
(2) STUDY AREA
1 SCALE: 1" = 500'
IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING
REFLECT RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE APRIL 2002
ENGINEERING AND ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY REPORT
FOR LAKE ELSINORE.
CONSULTANTS. INC.
2201 DUPONT DRIVE, SUITE 620
IRVINE, CA. 92715
Tele.949.752.1530
Fax. 949-752-8381
DESIGNED BY
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
APPRDV. BY
RMN
TJF
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CAMPGROUND BOAT LAUNCHING FACILITY
FIGURE 1
SHEET -L or ~
JOB NO. 731-12
SCAl.[ AS SHOWN
DATE 2 DEe 2004
NOBLE
ACiBIDA rTa3 NO.
PACE I 0
'L..-'2-
Of It.!
NOBLE
CONSULTANTS. INC.
~
@ "
;
REGRADE SHOREUNE FOR
UNIFORM SLOPES INTO LAKE
EXISTING PENINSULA
. c>:.~,::...~.COMPLETELY REMOVED
.:>'>~.... -..-..-..-..-
..~~.._.=~?;;;i,;) 7
// \,..::..::.: COMPLETELY REMOVED I
1// \...- EXISTING PENINSULA FOR :
I UNIFORM SLOPES INTO !j)I<E
.-.,
-'
EXCA\ilI.T-I8-t<r 'QUANTITIES:
_..-1'0:6'00 CY NET CUT
.._..-" (EXCESS FILL MATERIAL)
J
I
0) ~C~~~~~ot SITE PLAN
ALTERNATIVE PLAN 1 - ELIMINATE SAND
PENINSULA AND BREAKWATER
2201 DUPONT DRIVE, SUITE 620
IRVINE, CA. 92715
Tele.949-752.1530
Fax. 949-752-8381
DESICNED BY
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
APPROV. BY
RMN
TJF
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
CAMPGROUND BOAT LAUNCHING FACILITY
FIGURE 2
~\.~...>A nt;A;l NO.
FAG! II
SHEET
JOB NO.
SCALE
DATE
-L DF --2-
731-12
AS SHOWN
2 DEe 2004
2-2-
OF tV
/"""' .
,--
/"""'
;:;
~
<Il
?i;
'"
u
o a..
Cl ~
ffi <>:
~
~ ~
a:: <>:
lD
W
Cl u
5 z
u ;::
...
<>: 0
~ ri
u
z ,
~;
~l
oi
""
'"
0 0
to ...
N N
;:;
W
>-
<Il
?i;
<>:
!g
;0,
'"
~ <Il
<>: ~
lD a::
'" w
U Cl
0 5
Cl u
U <>:
z
!;i 0
I
g U
Z
LL ...
in
N
..
a..
;:;
...
<>:
I
U
Z
;;:>
:5
~
0
lD
o
to
N
z
Eiil
Mil
(/):-
~Ui
~~
00)
G
~~
Ow
I>
~g
II"
~~:...
~~
oco
Q.O)
@
/ <(
-1r
I ;:;
w
>-
a.. IC
;:; V>
...
<>: I;i
I
U ~
Z V>
;;:> ~
:'5 i'i:
w
z
:'5
w
a..
g
V>
--, .,~-..
<>:
a..
'"
/
/
8
u
::> I
o >-
~~~
:5;0,,,,
~~f%
z:CJ:::1--
"'CO~
~GW~
Z<Wa:=:
~~~~
xOOo
Wl-I--{lJ
r'.-.._w
: <>:~
I (D fZ~~
,: i ,I ~~~
. J ;,:\ G1t:}ii:
i I ;'i ~gtl
: I '.'-\ ::: Vl is
! [,.' ."~ ~~~
1/ :'pU
t; \
"-
'"
""
'"
I
U
Z
S
,~
~ ~
. ~ g
-----------~,
""
z~
::i "
0..:-
ill~
~~
i~}
fiL>~
<t;;::l
Z:j
)-'"
""Uv>
8~
.-,U
-X
X'" W
"'~
,
~
(.)
o
o
C)
z
~
o
..J
LL
N
Z
<(
..J
a..
ill
>
~
Z
~
W
...
..J
<(
"'I Z;;
"'~ 0
-0 '"
,!. 3i u
I'" OJ
....VlO
'" """,
t
hh
>-
>-
::;
U
<(
LL
w
<>:Cl
OZ
Z:;:
~~
W::>
w:S
~
:S~
~@
~!i
-::>
UO
<>:
Cl
ll.
:IE
<(
u
('I)
ill
~
~
S2
IL
~I~III
, ~ ~
Ii II
N
;a
~,,~=
llls::t...."'l
~~;;:t
iii<~~
oUJ;i
~~t~
~
z
~
-l
0-",
C)i5
Z~
o
~~
0::;)
C)O)
.]C. 22-
MO! 1:2- Of IY
/'"'
/'"'
~,
0:
"'.
No
"-
'"
W <(
"- '"
g
II>
N
Z
'" 0
'" "-
w
ID <(
'"
"- "-
<( a:
'"
"- '"
a: U
::l I
>-
;0
On
~
'"
u
>-
II>
B
I
I~
V>
!;(
"-0
::;--'
<(lL
"'",
I~
UD
Z'"
:::l<(
:sg
w~
","'0.
~:Sg
~0V>
",>-w
<~o
~0iJ)
IDZ_
(5..
~ZN
",wI
,,-Uf-
~~3:
z
~~
LO
N
."
w "
en'
~:;j
O;J.
o::u
Ucn
@
/
/+
[3
U W
5 IE
Woo
oow,,-
:5<0
~~~
zi:5Vi
za:::~
w"'<n
"- -<"-
<-'~~~
~<:x:
!Q2....~
xooo
WI-I-CD
"-
2
-<
oo
I
U
Z
=>
'--. 5
,~----- ~
--~--~,
'"
z~
~ "
a..~
Ww
!::~
Cf)en
N
D::
W
~
<(
W
D::
m
0-
~
0-
Q:
"'I z;;
N~O
-ON
~!.~ ()
I'" w
..,....V)O
-<N
i
Idi
>-
f-
:J
<3
<(
....
w
",C>
OZ
~:i:
~Pi "'"
W::> W
~~D::
~ ~ :J
.... 0 c>
OlD u:
~!i
u5
'"
"
Q.
~
<(
U
M
Z
<(
...J
0-
W
>
~
~ ~I~III
...J
<( iiii
a
g:Oi<;;
1Il~:!:Q
~~""
~''101O
Q<.lU
~I~l
~
z
:5
a.. 0
c>g
z~
0--
o?~
c>~
~~~~ rrat
PAO! 71
2...2..
OF It
~I z~
N~O
-ON
I '2-~o
I"' W
~ 1I)t--V)O
""N
/# i
,..-, w idi
.., )-
0 .-
:J
W <3
~ <I:
...
(f) > ~Cl
!;;: W OZ
QO ..J ~~ It)
",,-, W ...JZ
<1:"- '<0 Q
<( "':> W
ere> <l) er ",j c:::
I~ N Q "lit
a:: '" :;)
UO @~ j!;(
zer Z "
::><( :s ~g
:3:fi ..,W u::
!Z!'" l1. )-0
.-Z
-:>
:5I W 00
.... > ""
Z <O~ Cl
~ Q..
giil ::E
<I:
Mil Z 0
(/)~ c::: ~I~III
(/).. w
(/)w
~~ J-
..J
U<Jl <(
@ z 0 ~ ~ ~
::?
::s II I i II
G- .
W Iii
...J
l- tS 1J
en (/) ~:Ol<=
UJl=t....l"'l
~~;>:t
<~~
c;;U
~~~l
~
"..-.-
~
I
/'
~
"_ w<
"''''
g:S~
lL.O~
~~fD
:J<nE5
WWc>
"'a.z
~g=>
V>v>",
~~~
~~o
~~~
; -;j
E~ffi
~u~
t;;'"
Z::l
:G'"
.... V>
~g~
<x>U
XNX
\If')~
~
:I:
U
Z
=>
:5
-....~
'----.. ~
,"---- ~
..... .------
--.'---.--..-,
-......-,-..''\..-
-.-,
, ---'-.
.'~
.-"'.-
'"
z
~
G-o
,,~
z~
0,.
~~
,,~
il
2.'L
OF IY
PAGe It{
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
REPORT TO
PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION
,--
TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS
FROM: RICHARD W ATENP AUGH, CITY MANAGER
DATE: JANUARY 12,2005
SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR AQUATIC SAFETY
ASSESSMENT OF LAKE ELSINORE
BACKGROUND
The City Council requested a Lake safety study by an "aquatic safety expert" to evaluate
current lake-safety conditions and make recommendations for improvements.
There is no certifying organization in which to easily draw upon to select the type of "Aquatic
Safety Expert" the City would require to evaluate the wide range of safety issues relevant to
Lake Elsinore. Based on correspondence with the City's JPIA attorneys, City Staff contacted
an individual named Tom Ebro. Mr. Ebro's extensive curriculum vitae in the field of aquatic
recreation and recognition as an "Expert Witness" on aquatic safety in countless court cases
established his credentials.
,-- Staff presented the credentials of the proposed consultant, Tom Ebro, and a draft outline for
the scope of services to the Public Safety Advisory Commission (PSAC). The
Commissioner's thought Mr. Ebro's specific experience was somewhat dated and weak in the
areas of aquatic safety of natural public beaches, policy and signage. In addition, the PSAC
recommended narrowing the scope of services by eliminating all boating safety tasks and to
focus solely on water safety for waders/swimmers.
DISCUSSION
Staff began a new search for an aquatic safety expert based on the guidance of the PSAC.
Staff reviewed the backgrounds and resumes ofthree additional candidates and selected Tom
Griffiths, Aquatic Safety Research Group LLC. Mr. Griffiths' formal education, experience,
research, authorship and expert witness testimony in the field of aquatic safety qualifies him to
consult to the City. In addition, City Staff purchased and read Mr. Griffiths' book entitled
"Better Beaches" and found the contents to be thorough and relevant to the aquatic safety
issues of Lake Elsinore.
City Staff prepared an agreement for professional services for the proposed consultant and
DRAFT "Scope of Services" for review by the Public Safety Advisory Commission.
~
~hDA rraa NO. 23
PAC! I Of 3~
/"""
/"""
,.,.-.
FISCAL IMPACT
The aquatic safety assessment performed by Mr. Griffiths will cost $22,000. This item was
budgeted in the Lake and Aquatic Resources Department's budget in the amount of $25,000
for FY 2004-2005.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve proposed consultant and scope of services.
PREPARED BY: Pat Kilroy, Director of Lake & Aquatic Resources
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA LISTING:
~ nas p<<>. 2. J
PAC! 'L Of: '3 'I
/"""
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This Agreement is made and entered into this
between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation
Aquatic Safety Research Group LLC. ("Consultant").
day of January, 2005, by and
("City") and Thomas Griffiths,
RECITALS
A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special
services which will be required by this Agreement.
B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and
knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions
described herein.
C. City desires to retain Consultant to render professional services and related work
as set forth in this Agreement.
AGREEMENT
Environmental Setting and General Description of Work to be Performed
Lake Elsinore is the largest natural freshwater lake in Southern California with approximately'
/""" 3,000 surface acres and fourteen miles of shoreline. The Lake is characterized by floods and
droughts with extreme changes in lake elevation and shoreline fluctuations. The local watershed
drains about 26 square-miles directly into the Lake at multiple entry points through both natural
and manmade storm drains. Lake Elsinore is nutrient enriched and produces dense algae growth,
which causes low water clarity and poor visibility. These local environmental conditions
compound management of standard recreational aquatic safety.
The City desires to contract the performance of a "recreational aquatic safety assessment" of the
shoreline of Lake Elsinore by an aquatic safety expert. The recreational aquatic safety
assessment shall identify the potential risks to waders/swimmers and the adequacy of current
practices, policies, personnel and programs to reduce these risks and increase water safety. A
detailed written report of the findings of this assessment and comprehensive recommendations to
improve water safety shall be produced by the Consultant.
1. Scope of Services - The Consultant shall furnish the following services (Tasks) in
a professional manner:
Task-a. Meet with City Staff to discuss background, aquatic safety assessment plan and
coordination.
Task-b. Perform an on-site aquatic safety assessment of the Lake's geographic features,
signs and other characteristics relevant to the safety of waders/swimmers along the
/""" shoreline and identify potential risks and adequacy of signage. The assessment shall
include, but not be limited to...
ProfServAgmt.4014.000
~ rreM HO.
MO!_ :J
2]
_0$.. 3 ~
"'"'
1. Public beaches, LERA Campground, levee and City owned shoreline property.
11. Storm drains.
iii. Island Well effluent.
iv. Regulatory and Safety Signage.
v. Potential risks and management practices associated with changing lake-elevations
(water levels) on geographic features and safety response.
Task-c. Review adequacy of current City practices, policies, personnel and programs to
reduce risks and increase water safety for waders/swimmers. Review shall include.. .
1. City ordinances and Lake Elsinore Master Plan.
11. City handouts and distribution methods.
iii. Appropriateness, placement, capacity and enforcement of designated wading areas by
buoyant line.
iv. Appropriateness and application oflifeguards on non-swimming public beaches.
"'"'
v. Shoreline emergency response.
Task-d. Review design plans for rehabilitation of the Boat Launch Facility at the LERA
Campground to ensure the design maximizes operational safety of the facility. Provide
recommendations on the operation and management of the facility with regard to water
safety.
Task-e. Produce a written Administrative DRAFT Report for internal reVIew and
comment by City Attorneys and City Staff. The report shall include...
1. Identification of risks to waders/swimmers.
11. Review of current City practices, policies, personnel and programs.
iii. Recommendations for reducing risk, legal liability and increasing water safety of
waders/swimmers through suggested improvements in practices, policies, personnel
and programs.
Task-f. The Consultant shall be available to (attend !bree mllletmgs.in the City of Lake
Elsinore, as well as provide consultation to City Staff by correspondence (phone, e-mail
or fax) for a period of six months following the production of the Final Report at no extra
charge to the City. ~ ---
~ Task-I!. Produce a written Final Report.
ProfServAgmt.4014.000
2
~ lla1J 140. 2]>
PIG! '-I ~Of.~??
........J.,
/""'
1. Incorporate appropriate comments from City Council, City Attorneys and City Staff
into Final Report.
2. Time of Performance - The services of Consultant are to commence upon
execution of this Agreement and shall continue for a total period of 360 days. The
Final Report shall be completed within 180 days after the execution of this
agreement followed by an additional 180 days of consultation to City Staff by
correspondence.
3. Compensation - Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance
with the Schedule of Charges set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated
herein by reference. And in no event shall Consultant's compensation exceed $22.000.00 without
additional authorization from the City. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be
deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment.
4. Method of Payment - Consultant shall submit monthly billings to City describing
the work performed during the preceding month. Consultant's bills shall include a brief
description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours
spent and' by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay
Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff. When
payments made by City equal 90% of the maximum fee provided for in this Agreement, no
further payments shall be made until the final work under this Agreement has been accepted by
City.
---.
5. Extra Work - At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request
that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is
determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties
did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant
shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from City.
Extra work will be invoiced separately from services performed in accordance with the Scope of
Services.
6. Termination - This Agreement may be terminated by the City immediately for
cause or by either party without cause upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. Upon
termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the
effective date of termination.
7. Ownership of Documents - All plans, studies, documents and other writings
prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the
course of implementing this Agreement, except working notepad internal documents, shall
become the property of the City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and the City shall
have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to
Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such reports,
plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. City acknowledges
that any use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein shall
be at the sole risk of the City. City further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless
/""'
ProfServAgmt.4014.000
3
AOBiDA nos NO. 23
PAC! S- - Of. 3 8'
,,-...
".---.
,I"""'
Consultant, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, demands,
actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and
expenses in connection therein), arising out of the City's use of such materials in a manner
beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein.
a. Licensing of Intellectual Property - This Agreement creates a
nonexclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modifY, reuse, or sublicense any and all
copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies,
drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium
of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise
recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under
this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require that all subcontractors agree in
writing that City is granted a nonexclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the
subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant
has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such
representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design
professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be
limited in any way in its .use of the Documents & Data at any time; provided that any such use
not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk.
b. Confidentiality - All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures,
drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other
Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not,
without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the
performance of the services under this Agreement. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any
person or entity not connected with the performance of the services under this Agreement.
Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known,
or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not
use City's name or insignia, photographs relating to project for which Consultant's services are
rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant's services under this Agreement in any
magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium
without the prior written consent of City.
8. Consultant's Books and Records
a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices,
vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for
services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3)
years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant to
this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate
performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer
period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement.
ProfServ Agmt.40 14.000
4
AOSmA IT'EM NO.
PACEb
23
Of 38
,--
c. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this
Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business
hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated
representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for
inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually
agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices
in this Agreement.
d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be
lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant's business, City
may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records
be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to
such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant's
representatives, or Consultant's successor-in-interest.
9. Independent Contractor - It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of
the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and
shall not act as an agent or employee of ~he City. Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement
benefits or other benefits which accrue to City's employees, and Consultant hereby expressly
waives any claim it may have to any such rights.
---
10. Interests of Consultant - Consultant (including principals, associates and
professional employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or
interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered
by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which
would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant's services
hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties
hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement.
Consultant is not a designated employee within die meaning of the Political Reform Act
because Consultant:
a. will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her
rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and
direction of the City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and
b . possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond rendition
of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2).)
11. Professional Ability of Consultant - City has relied upon the professional training
and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into
this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical
personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under
this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the
standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of
expertise.
,--
ProfServ Agrnt.40 14.000
5
~e.itDA 1TE1l.t NO. 2.- J
PAGe 7 Of 5 (j'
.".....-.
12. Compliance with Laws - Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession
to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations.
13. Licenses - Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has the licenses,
permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required
of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that
Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term
of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of
Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City business license.
14. Indemnity - Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its
officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims,
demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all
costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the performance of this Agreement or its
failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such
claim arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents,
employees or volunteers.
15. Insurance Requirements
a. Insurance - Consultant, at Consultant's own cost and expense, shall
procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies.
,,-,
i. Workers' Compensation Coverage - Consultant shall maintain
Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her
employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant
shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance
and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California
for all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal of all
Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days
prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against
City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
performed by Consultant for City.
ii. General Liability Coverage - Consultant shall maintain commercial
general liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per
occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If a commercial
general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either
the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this
Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence
limit.
/""'"
Ill. Automobile Liability Coverage - Consultant shall maintain
automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all
activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed
under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non-owned vehicles, in
ProfServ AgmtAO 14.000
6
-:..e T- ~ 2.: 8'
".......
an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for
each occurrence.
iv. Professional Liabilitv Coverage - Consultant shall maintain
professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging
negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant's operations under
this Agreement, whether such operations by the Consultant or by its employees,
subcontractors, or subconsultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one
million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a combined
single limit per occurrence basis.
b. Endorsements - Each general liability and automobile liability insurance
policy shall be with insurers possessing a Best's rating of no less than A:VII and shall be
endorsed with the following specific language:
i. The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees,
agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability
arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the Consul~ant, including materials,
parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.
/""'
ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its
elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance
maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be
considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it.
111. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a
separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of
the insuring company.
iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or
appointed officers, officials, employees or agents.
v. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not
affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials,
employees, agents or volunteers.
vi. The insurance provided by this Policy shall not be suspended, voided,
canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice
has been received by the City.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions - Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Consultant shall
demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions.
d. Certificates of Insurance - Consultant shall provide certificates of
"....... insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required
herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of
ProfServAgmt.4014.000
7
~~ rmlS NO. z..]
Me! Cf Of. '3?
/""'"'
performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the
City at all times during the term of this Agreement.
16. Notices - Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing
and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed
to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within
48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.
If to City: . Dick W atenpaugh, Ci~;~Ma~
/ City of Lake Elsinore
130 South Main Street
-"-. . Lake Elsinore, CA 92?~a./"
^-. <'~~.-.
If to Consultant:
Tom Griffiths, President
Aquatic Safety Research Group, LLC
1632 Glenwood Circle
State College, P A 16803
/""'"'
17. Entire Agreement - This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive
statement of Agreement between the City and Consultant. All prior written and oral
communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are
sup~rseded in total by this Agreement.
18. Amendments - This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written
document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
19. Assi~ent and Subcontracting - The parties recognize that a substantial
inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience
and competence of Consultant and the subcontractors listed in Exhibit D. Consultant shall be
fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of any subcontractors. Assignments of any or
all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only
with the express consent of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to
be performed under this Agreement except as provided in Exhibit D without the written
authorization of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully
responsible to City for all acts or omissions of those subcontractors. Nothing in this Agreement
shall create any contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor nor shall it create
any obligation on the part of the City to payor to see to the payment of any monies due to any
such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law.
20. Waiver - Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a
continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this
Agreement.
21. Severability - If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid,
illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions
ofthis Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
,..-....
ProfServ Agmt.40 14.000
8
~11EMNO.
PAGe 10
2.5
Of 3F
,--
22. Controlling Law Venue - This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be
governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement
shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Riverside.
23. Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees - If either party to this Agreement
commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing
party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert
witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees.
24. Mediation - The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes
arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall
mutually agree upon the mediator and shall share the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are
unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMSIENDISPUTE
("JAMS") or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five
qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected
by JAMS and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains
unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation.
25. Execution - This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of
which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties
when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this
Agreement, it shall. not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.
~
26. Authority to Enter Agreement - Consultant has all requisite power and authority to
conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants
that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to
make this Agreement and to bind each respective party.
27. Prohibited Interests - Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed
nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for
Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid
nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely
for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration
contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or
violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability.
For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or
her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or
anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.
27. Equal Opportunity Employment - Consultant represents that it is an equal
opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or
applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex
or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial
employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or
termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City's Minority Business
,--
ProfServAgmt.4014.000
9
~riENJftO. 23
PIa /1 01 :33
~
",.......
~
Enterprise program, AffIrmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in
effect or hereinafter enacted.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the
date first written above.
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE:
By
"
\
,
Dick Watenpaugh, City Manager'
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Attachments: Exhibit A - Schedule of Charges
ProfServ AgmtAO 14.000
CONSULTANT:
Title
Business License #
ATTEST:
City Clerk
10
~ rtai NO. '2-]
PACE /2- OF3 ~
/'""
/'""
/'""
EXHmIT "A"
Consultants Schedule of Charges
[INSERT]
ProfServ AgmtAO 14.000
EXHIBIT "A" - Page 1
.~f1BINO. LJ
PACE I :1 Of3~
TOM GRIFFITHS, ED.D.
PRESIDENT
/"'"
AQUATIC SAFETY RESEARCH GROUP, LLC
1632 GLENWOOD CIRCLE
STATE COLLEGE, P A 16803
TEL: (814) 234-0313
EIN # 25-1778144
TOMGRIFFITHS@AQUATlCSAFETYROUP.COM
LAKE ELSINORE PROPOSAL
After reviewing your Scope of Services for an Aquatic Safety Expert, I would like to apply
for the consulting position to assist you with recreational aquatic use of Lake Elsinore. As
the principal owner of Aquatic Safety Research Group, LLC, I offer more than 35 years of
aquatic safety experience. I aro.Q!!~.,"Q!.!!1s..few.beach specialW.s..inthe C.OIJntry. Currently, I
serve as the Aquatic Director'and Safety Officer for Athletics at Penn State University and
have done so since 1986. I am also assisted by Attorney Shawn DeRosa presently located in
Boston, MA. Formerly, Shawn was in charge of all the state owned and operated pools and
beaches in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts' state park system. Shawn and I now teach
both swimming pool and beach management courses internationally through the Aquatic
Safety Research Group, LLC.
/"'"
The scope of our work will include ~{!fe1Yln.!l?~!jJmS.~f YOllr facilities, meetings
\\jth staff and other appropriate indivi~~ls, verbal reports, written plalls'@d ~omp~h~iy~
~~:i~p2.Ij~"We wQurcralSo'1Je*1lappy'to rev}ew loc~i:l ordi~~S~~JPJl.t~n.QIY..a.J:~Ylew
~xisti~~nJlg~.~i1lt~ygg~~!~?~s, ~or ~!J:lP~2,~~!!1~Q~~and analyze e~,is,!~!lgfly'ers,.ru!es,
r~ti?~S~1tpoli((i~~~,We will. do our best. to make o~r recommendations both practical
and aIIOrdable; we have a reputatIon of workmg well WIth others.
I would be willing to consult with you via phone and/or e-mail for up to one calendar year
following our last meeting and/or written report at no additional expense to you.
Our hourly fees are as follows:
. $250/hour for professional work performed (inspections, reading, writing, etc.)
. $150/hour for travel
. $350/hour for court appearances (depositions and trial).
In that this is a comprehensive evaluation that would be difficult to bill by the hour, we
would like to propose a flat fee of$22,000.00. This rate would include up to three (3) trips to
California, each trip comprised of one day's work and associated travel time for one
individual. If you require both Attorney Shawn DeRosa and I to travel to California
simultaneously, this would be counted as two (2) trips. If more than three (3) individual trips
are required, I would simply propose charging $750.00 for expenses for each additional trip
beyond the tl1ree (3) trips covered in this proposal. If you want to retain our services, I would
request a $5,000.00 retainer to be applied towards expenses prior to performing any work.
~
AQUA TIC SAFETY RESEARCH GROUP, LLC
www.aquaticsafetygroup.com
~rraaNO. 23
~Of. "73
~
Finally, we begin a similar comprehensive lake project with Ohio State Parks commencing in
February. For a reference regarding our services you may contact Glenn Cobb at Ohio State
Parks at 740-572-1833 or 614-265-6507.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me directly at 814-863-4000 daytime
EST or 814-234-0313 EST.
I look forward to hearing from you in the near future.
;;:J'
Tom Griffiths, Ed.D.
Aquatic Safety Research Group, LLC
1632 Glenwood Circle
State College, P A 16803
~
~
AQUATIC SAFETY RESEARCH GROUP, LLC
www.aquaticsafetygroup.com
~ lI'EM NO. 2.. J
PIQ.JJ -Of ?f?
.~
Tom Griffiths, Ed.D.
Aquatic Safety Research Group, LLC
1632 Glenwood Circle
State College, PA 16803
814-234-0313 EIN 25-1887144
www.aquaticsafetygroup.com
EMPLOYMENT
. Penn State University, Director
of Aquatics &- Safety Officer
fo~ Athlet}<;$, 1986-present
. Indiana. ~tate University, Director
of Aqu~Hcsan~SCUBA,..Assoc.
Professor,198~'1986..,; .' .'.
.; University qt Maf;ylahd,DiFe(:tot
of . . cs,' SPffl1gb0~t~ pivi,ng
~g1i!A!Pire.'tt9i;' ......
.'8!~:; : :~:"~ri_~~:''''~;-: - '>~- -i:~~;~~~'~:r.;;'t,:::,~~}:>;,:;;
INVENTOR
. The Five Minute Scanning
Strategy <P,tOOO
. Griff's Guard'Stationsn.l
Better Beaches
/"'"'
Management and Operation of Safe
and Enjoyable Swimming Beaches
by Tom Griffiths, Ed.D.
INTRODUCTION ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . iii
PART I: BEACH BASICS: Design, Operation and Maintenance. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1
Chapter 1: Design Considerations. . _ .... . ... .. .....'... ...... .... .... -.. . .... .... ..... 2
Chapter 2: Operational Considerations _ . _ _ . .., . . . . . _ . _ . _ ... . . .. .. . .. . .., .. . . . .. . . . . . . 14
Chapter 3: Beach aeoning and Maintenance ........ _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Chapter 4: Improving Accessibility to Our Beaches. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
by Charles A Duncan, Ph.D., and Joseph Nolan, Ph.D., C.ARE.
Chapter 5: America's Best Beaches. . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
/""'
PART D: WATER QUALITY.... . ... _.. ... ....... ........... . . .. . .., .. . .. .. " -.. .......37
Chapter 6:
Chapter 7:
Chapter 8:
Water Quality: Past, Present and Future. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Controlling Plant and Animals Pests .................. - . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . .51
Environmental Concerns, Volunteer Beach aeon-Ups,
and Adopt-A-Beach Programs_........ _... _.......... -................... .54.
PART m: WATER SAFETY. . ... . .., .... . .,. _.... ............ . . ... .... .. ...... .. . ......59
Chapter 9:
Chapter 10:
Chapter 11:
Chapter 12:
Chapter 13:
Chapter 14:
Chapter 15:
Chapter 16:
Chapter 17:
Chapter 18:
General Safety Guidelines for Beaches. _ . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Peace and Tranquility: The Flat-Water Beach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
Beauty and the Beast: The Surf Beach. . ... ..... .. . .... .......... .. ... ......76
United States Ufesaving Assodation . . _ . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
by B. Chris Brewster
Open-Water Lifeguard Effectiveness and National Lifesaving Statistics. . . . . . 94
by Richard Gould
Weather at the Beach by ElHot Abrams . . . . _ . . _ . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - . . 98
liability and Risk Management by Armie Clement, Ph.D. -.... - . - . . . . . - - . . . 105
Practical Risk Management. . . . . . _ _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
Beach Signage - "Signs, Signs, Everywhere Signs!" ................... - . . - . 134
Hazardous Beach ..... _. _ _..................................... .143
General Safety
. (iuideliille5d,fp,r....lle~.ches.
. --.~,~:.v,~:,:.':-: ~Ji0~2~L:-}i/?;i~!~ti~i~1,:t."t~~!%.'4J::;': ":~,:.;;.'~<;;':_~'
U
I
!
~;
>~
~E
....
~IL
~L:
'1::..
:>.c
'^ a. .
~i
=as
ILi:
~-o
oii ;
::-~ .
~~
.sZ
~
.c
0.
Lifeguard on foot patrol in New Zealand
Beaches can be hazardous, and it is a fact
that open water swimming has more risks
associated with it than swimming in pools or
water parks. In Ontario, Canada, during 1996
for instance, 73% of all preventable drownings
occurred in open water.l
Perhaps the greatest issue any agency
ormunidpality must come to grips with is:
Will we place lifeguards on duty at our
beaches? or Will we place "Swim at Your
Own Risk" signs in the scmd? This is a
difficult question to answer. Before answering
this, it would be wise to refer to USLA Rescue
Statistics and Fred Maers comprehensive study,
which may lead you to believe that you cannot
afford not to have lifeguards. Hopefully, after
reading this book, beach management and
personnel should have suffident information
to make a more educated decision regarding
lifeguards and supervision in general.
Beaches As Open Space
While there are many fine lifeguards and
excellent lifesaving training agendes through-
out the world,It is impossible to $lard every.
.ew~q;
beachfronts. When it is impossible to guard c
the shoreline that exists in a jurisdiction, it
would be prudent to select the best and most
popular beaches and guard those, while en-
couraging the public to use the guarded bead
and discouraging the use of unguarded beach
When deciding whether to provide lifeguam
one school of thought is this: the more a watt
front is improved for swimming and the mor
attractive it becomes to potential guests, the
more guests expect to have lifeguards. FolloM
this philosophy, one theory may be "if you
improve the physical characteristics of your
beach, then indude lifeguards." When swim.
ming is allowed in natural and rustic areas
and improvements are not made, it may be
considered acceptable not to provide lifeguan
When beaches are used as "open spacen (tha
is when there is no additional parking, fonne
entrance, restrooms or other structures there 0
has less than 50 swimmers/waders per linear
mile)2 it may be acceptable to not have life-
guards on duty. When this is the case, lifegu/ll'l
may not be considered justifiable by some COI
munities, as long as governmental laws do)}l
require them. Before enacting any of these
guidelines, check with the state, county and
local health departments who are responsibk
for public swimming plac:;es and setting the ~
quired minimum safety standards. It is impoj
tant to warn and educate guests, if lifeguards~
i
Peace and Tranquility:
:;"cTheElat0Water. Beach
~tEj~L~:;';::::.~1:,:.f5:~{J~~;Y;~;~~;'~1jjl;fL1~\~!~}ik~il~t~k245:2~'iL~';_~U::L&1Li~~::';:,L>::
~
~
c
..
~
..
o
ti
"C
1ii
o
i!
G'.
..
c
o
l'
..
>-
..
lD
~
~
.~
~
:0'
c
..
c
~
1::
.3
o
'0
f
Don Castro Swim Lagoon in the East Boy
Regional Park District, Oakh1nd, CA .
At first glance, flat-water beaches appear
to be much more calm than surf beaches. But
this tranquillity gives the impression that these
beaches are safer - this is very misleading.
Although waves, currents and dangerous
marine life may not be as abundant at flat-
water beaches, there are still some significant
hazards associated with them.
Because they appear to be harmless and
lack natural hazards, flat-water beaches
are, in fact, more attractive to families with
younger children and less experienced swim-
mers. Therefore, higher-risk patrons may flock
to flat-water beaches. Conversely, stronger,
more experienced swimmers may be attracted
-waterbeaches.1
at inland beaches, thus providing a slight m
gin of safety. Also, the hazards at surfbeachl
give cause for increased lifeguard vigilance (
attracts their attention to hot spots. Flat-watt
beaches often do not provide these types of a
or tell-tale signs of water hazards, so they CQj
produce monotony for the lifeguards and Ie<
parents feeling overconfident or apathetic re
garding water safety - both of which can bt
dangerous. Also, shallow-water diving and
neck injuries are a partirular problem at flat
water beaches, and for this reason underwat
obstructions must be dearly marked or remm
In addition, B. Chris Brewster of USLA stron~
believes that in the flat-water environment,
lifeguards are less able to evaluate the swim.
ming skills of the beachgoers. A wader at a f
water beach could be an Olympic swimmer
a non-swimmer, but the lifeguard will never
know this until the wader gets into deep wat
The use of floatation devices can make this e\
more challenging for the lifeguard, because.
non-swimmer can suddenly become sepamt
from the device in water well over their head
and some distance from shore (and rescue).2
As a result, everyone in a flat-water envi
ronment is a potential victim and distress co
occur instantly. Conversely, weak swimmers
are usually intimidated by surf or unable to
negotiate it, thus keeping them dose to shOll
) CHALLENGES OF
:,'r-WATER BEACHES
Because flat-water beaches can be so
?iving, safety may not be foremost on
'minds of lifeguards and parents. Therefore,
'section becomes more important than it
" d initially appear.
! Because flat-water beaches are more attrac-
; to those with lesser watermanship skills,
ean develop quickly and unexpectedly.
'part, this is often caused by irregular bottom
,bditions and a lack of water clarity. Stepping
to holes, troughs and drop offs is not uncom-
" n in flat-water areas. Walking in chest-to
, cdeep water can be catastrophic for many
ers. Without surf and nearshore CUf-
; ts, significant sediments can build up on the
.)tom. This sediment build-up can cause a
'nifieant slope. Waders can unexpectantly
'de into deep water quickly, especially be-
use the bottom can be slick with mud or
ae growth. Also, stumps, rocks and other
odes can cause weaker swimmers to trip
" d lose their footing, or create a huge hazard
'OSe entering the water head first. When-
, possible, underwater obstructions should
removed or marked, and the visitors should
", warned of these underwater hazards, partic-
arly if they are located in the designated
.ng area.
. eep-Water Areas
;, At some beaches, buoys and safety lines
. actually lure weak and non-swimmers out.
to water over their heads. Deep-water areas
"'th docks, slides or diving boards can likewise
ttract guests that don't have the swimming
. for those deep areas. In this case, lifeguards
.' ust be aware to watch the lines, buoys and
;;ther destinations that weak swimmers might
: ttempt to attain. In addition, it is a good idea
. station lifeguards at these outermost bound-
,~es and other deep-water amenities.
ATER CONDITIONS
if\S
~i
~~
~3
s.g
~.!
~=
8lL
0;;;
0"
f:i
0<
>-
..
II>
1;;
~
.,
A Itlck of WIIfer dtlrity is most often evidenced where most
waders congregate. Del Valle, Etlst Beach, livermore, CA.
poor water clarity itself cannot cause a drown-
ings, it makes search and recovery of a sub-
merged victim more difficult when time is
critical.
Water clarity simply cannot be improved
at many tIat-water beaches. Because clarity is
environmentally dependent and can be im-
proved only with chemistry, filtration or new
fresh water, many tIat-water beaches are
plagued with poor water clarity. Lifeguards,
parents and beachgoers must all be more
cautious and vigilant under conditions of poor
water darity. Underwater searches for missing
swimmers are not uncommon at tIat-water
beaches, so having underwater recovery train-
ing and equipment is important.
Currents
Currents are often present at flat-water
beaches and, unlike the lulls in currents that
occur in surf beaches, flat-water currents, par-
ticularly rivers, are relentless. When swimmers
are caught in flat-water currents they usually
fight by swimming against it, but are less likely
to escape than when caught in many localized
and short-lived ocean currents.
Aquatic Life
Although our oceans are perceived as hav-
ing an abundance of dangerous marine life,
flat-water beaches also have unique life forms.
Uke the ocean forms, the flat-water organisms
are more feared than they should be, but un-
like their ocean counterparts, these organisms
certainly pose fewer hazards. Problems like
, pon~()p.<lIldM., ~mQ~
1Wil2:.L0f 3~
./"'""
Practical Risk
~~
~if
~~
~2
<=1;;
a"
;:elf
=-.::
~~.
u...
S~
ot
if~
j
.i
u
.
...
-.~
";..;;;,~.
Bilinguol betICh regulation sign in Del Volle, eolifornio
./"'""
Risk Management is the identification,
evaluation, and control of loss to personal and
real property, clients and students, employees
and the public.l loss may result in injury,
death, destruction of property, financial failure
or harm by reputation. While true risk man-
agement is a broad area of study, this chapter
emphaSizes practical risk management with a
focus on safety and the reduction of accidents.
Redudng hazards and accidents can only be
realistically accomplished by a systematic
analysis of all risks, or developing a system of
risk management This section is simply writ-
ten with an avoidance oflengthy discussions
and legal terminology to better help beach per-
sonnel in getting to the heart of the problem.
This chapter is not an academic treatment of
risk management but mther a practical and
user-friendly approach to the topic. Nor is it a
"doom and gloom" approach to the subject
Becoming a better beach risk manager is not a
difficult task; practical risk management is re-
ally just structured, organized common sense.
Finally, the author believes thattrue, risk man-
There are many resources, publications
and organizations to help those operating
waterfront facilities, and of course, this book
gives the reader a good start. The United States
Lifesaving Association is an excellent resource
in this area. Dependence on outside experts is
not overly encouraged because each beach is
so unique it is difficult to find experts who are
familiar with individual beaches. When it
comes to risk management, perhaps the best
experts are the local experts who know their
beach and water conditions intimately.
Risk management is serious business and
it is not something an agency can ignore. Risk .
management progmms are mandated by the !
Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) OS;
well as the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA) and other federal agency requirements.
There are risks involved in any recreation
activity, including a trip to the beach. Acciden
can happen despite best efforts to avoid them.
When they do occur, people sometimes seek
compensation through lawsuits, which can
threaten the financial well-being of beach
owners and their employees. It is impossible ,
prevent all accidents. It is possible, however, ;
identify risks, take reasonable steps to reduce,
them, and notifybeachgoers of any unusuaL.
risks that cannot be ameliorated so that they!
can use caution. These steps provide pro
to everyone involved in a day at the beach.
The point is to control these risks, make
beachgoers aware of the risks, and make
attempt to transfer the responsibilities for oc~
cepting these risks to the beachgoers. Pro .
beach risk management is not about . . .
ing all risks. Ultimately, if all risks are rem
recreational activities lose much of their Q
tion and fun. Downhill skiing makes a
analogy in this regard If all risks assoda
with downhill skiing were removed (tree$
,ete.
,...-,
Beach Signage -
"Signs, Signs,
~v~rmb~."~.....~'&II~.t"
"'~ . . -. ,', -... ' . . . .~ . '-.- :.~<~::~.~ '.:~'_.<- '. .' .',' -' - . .,-.' - ',"--'--.~;,,_,~._....., c. .
ci
-a
...
..
.c:
e
-.:
'"
~
f
.9
o
I
This chapter is a "show
and tell" of effective beach
signage; rather than writing
at length about effective sig-
nage, this chapter illustrates
good examples of appropri-
ate beach signs. The primary
pwpose of beach signs is to
warn and educate visitors to
the beach about risks and
hazards without sacrifidng
aesthetics. Regulations, infor-
mation and directions are
also valuable information for
signs to convey. The objective
of any beach signage pro-
gram is to increase safety and
enjoYment. There are three
basic tyPes of beach signs:
· Regulatory Signs
· Warning Signs, and
· Informational/Directional Signs
1M English translation, "Wet /loor,"
does notsend the co"ed message
in this case.
~
~.e"$
.......
~Q;,41
1!~.
Ol!~
~~l
.!!l!V
~~~
>v"
~ ..6
~e
8-;;
~~
.c:<
...c
>-
e
a
Cherry Creek State Parle, Colorado
Regulatory Signs
Regulatory signs are those which identify
local and state health and safety codes as well
as local beach or park rules. A regulatory sign
usually has an ordinance or law mandating
the action that is either required or banned. It
is best to include the ordinance number at the
bottom of the sign. "No SwiInming?rWading
........ .. ... .... ... ..... . -Q~l~~ellJ:eQ-
Warning sign: rip currents
Warning Signs
Many human factors experts agree that _
warning signs should be either red and Whi ."
black and white, or yellow and black. While i
red and white is preferred by many as a w
ing color combination, it shoul~ emphasized
that in an outdoor environment, red does
last nearly as
long as black in
the ultraviolet
rays of the sun.
As a result, red
signs need to be
repainted more
often than black.
Black and
white does indi-
cate warning but
may not be as
noticeable as
either red and
white or yellow
and black. Yellow rays 0/ the sun
and black offers the most contrast to the
to attract attention and is the danger color
scheme for highway signs.
Warning signs should also be conspi"
pl(.l~in ~,mategiclf,)Cati.o~: ".
,.--
THOMASJ. GRIFFITHS, Ed.D.
Director of Aquatics
Safety Officer for Athletics
McCoy Natatorium
The Pennsylvania State University
University Park, PA 16802, U.S.A.
Phone: 814-863-4000 Fax: 814-865-3728 E-mail:tjg4@psu.edu
www.aquaticsafetygroup.com
PERSONAL
1. Born: August 25, 1949, New York, New York
2. Married: Roni D. Reines: August 13, 1980
3. Children: Kendra Griffiths (1981); Rachel Griffiths (1985)
EDUCATION
1. Ed. D. Degree, 1979; University of Maryland, College Park, MD,
Educational Administration
~
2.
M.A. Degree, 1973; University of Maryland, College Park, MD,
Physical Education
3. B.S. Degree, 1971; Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, CT
Physical Education, Health Education
4. Diploma, 1967; Cardinal Hayes High School, Bronx, NY
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
1. 1986-Present: Manager of Aquatic Facilities. Department of Intercollegiate
Athletics, Penn State University, University Park, P A
Responsibilities: Coordinate and supervise all phases of aquatics for the
Department of Physical Education and Intercollegiate Athletics. Manage a
million dollar annual budget for four (4) indoor pools and one (1) 50 meter
outdoor pool and a Fitness Center overlooking the Indoor Pools. Supervise
intramural and club use of the pool plus outside group rentals. Coordinate
research projects conducted in the Natatorium.
2.
1986-Present: Affiliate Associate Professor with Graduate Faculty Status.
Department of Exercise and Sport Science, Penn State University, University
Park, P A.
Responsibilities: Teach a variety of courses on the undergraduate and graduate
level. All areas and levels of aquatics plus sports administration. Teach the
~
1
A08IOA ITBI NO. 2. 3
PACl2 Y 0$ 3d'
/"'"'
/"'"'
/"'"'
Aquatic Facility Course sponsored by The National Recreation and Parks
Association. Teach SCUBA diving courses sponsored by The National
Association of Underwater Instructors. Direct the annual Penn State Aquatic
Institute.
3.
1989-Present: Safety Officer of Intercollegiate Athletics. Department of
Intercollegiate Athletics, Penn State University, University Park, P A.
Responsibilities: Oversee safety checks of all athletic and recreational facilities
on campus. Supervise fire and safety inspections of all Intercollegiate buildings,
facilities and programs; file and investigate accident reports on all injuries;
complete workman's compensation and workman's right to know for all athletic
facilities; establish risk management and emergency procedures for each facility.
Keep 250 employees, including coaches, informed of the latest trends in athletic
and recreational safety. Awarded Certificate from PSU for a decade of
consecutive service.
4.
1998-2001: Manager. Sarni Tennis Facility. Department ofIntercollegiate
Athlectics, Penn State University, University Park, P A
Responsibilities: Manage all aspects of the Sarni Tennis Facility including
maintenance and operations, practice periods as well as tournament play.
Scheduling, hiring, supervising and risk management responsibilities are
included.
5.
1989-Present: Instructor for The National Swimming Pool Foundation (N.S.P.F.)
Responsibilities: Teach the Certified Pool Opera~or (C.P.O.) course to pool
personnel throughout the country.
6. 1994-Present: Aquatic Facility Operator Instructor.
Responsibilities: Teach the Aquatic Facility Operators Course (AFO) to pool
personnel throughout the country for the National Recreation and Parks
Association (NRP A).
7. 1995-present: Instructor for P A Dept. of Health and Agriculture.
Responsibilities: Teach Pennsylvania's Department of Health and Department of
Agriculture Swimming Pool Inspectors.
8. 1999-Present: Safety Consultant for the Pool Management Group. Inc.
Responsibilities: Advise in safety matters for swimming pool companies in 13
cities overseeing 2, 5000 lifeguards
9.
1983-1986: Assistant Professor ofPhvsical Education. Indiana State
University, Terre Haute, IN1986, Associate Professor (tenured), Indiana State,
Terre Haute, IN.
Responsibilities: Teach basic and advanced SCUBA diving courses, water safety
programs, and promoting underwater education and research in the Midwest.
Teach sport psychology and motor learning on the graduate level.
2
~n~~I'iO. 2.3
PAGE '2. .s- Of 3 d'
~
10. 1983-1986: Aquatic Director, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN.
Responsibilities: Coordinate and supervise all swimming, recreational activities
and athletic events associated with the swimming pools. Develop an aquatic
curriculum and advise other swimming instructors.
11. 1985-1986: General Education Director, Physical Education
Department. Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN.
Responsibilities: Coordinate and supervise all phases of the Physical Education
Service or Activity Program. Responsibilities include scheduling, budgeting, and
curriculum development. Assigning and supervising graduate assistants as
needed.
12. 1977-1983: Aquatic Director, University of Maryland, College, Park, MD.
Responsibilities: Coordinate and supervise all swimming courses, recreational
activities and athletic events associated with the swimming pools. Develop an
aquatic curriculum and advise other swimming instructors.
13. 1971-1980: Springboard Diving Coach for Men and Women, University of
Maryland, College Park, MD.
Responsibilities: Coach both men's and women's intercollegiate teams. Recruit
High School divers to attend the University of Maryland.
~
14.
1973-1983: Instructor of Physical Education, University of Maryland,
College Park, MD.
Responsibilities: Teach Basic and Advanced SCUBA Diving, Water Safety and
Lifesaving Courses through the Physical Education Program.
15. 1971-1973: Graduate Assistant in Physical Education Department, University
of Maryland, College Park, MD
Responsibilities: Teaching various swimming courses in required Physical
Education Program.
OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
1. March 2003 - March 2004 President-Elect, NRPA, Aquatic Branch
2. June 24 - 28, 2002, Rescue Task Force Member and Chairman of Expert Meeting
on Scanning, The World Drowning Congress, Amsterdam, NL,
3. 2000-present: Centers for Disease Control (CDC), National Recreational Water
Illness Review Panel
4. 1990-present: Editorial Board, Aquatics International, Los Angeles
5. 1995-present: Technical Advisor, Pool and Spa Living, Philadelphia, PA
".....
3
AOStDA rTBI NO.
PACe 2-'
2..3
Of 33'
,.-...
6.
1986-Present: Aquatics Coordinator, Penn State University, Continuing
Education Department and Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University
Park, P A
7. 1986-Present: Executive Director, Pennsylvania Swimming Hall of Fame.
8. 1988-1994: Springboard Diving Referee, Atlantic Coast Conference (AC.C.)
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
9. 1990-1998: Ferguson Township Supervisor" PA Elected to two, four year terms.
Chairman.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
,.-... 15.
16.
17.
18.
1995-1996: Chairman, Centre Region Council of Governments.
1986-2000: Editor, Aqua Notes, Pennsylvania Aquatic Council.
1988-2000: Treasurer, Pennsylvania Aquatic Council.
1992-1998: President-. Pennsylvania Aquatic Council.
1986-Present: Certified Pool Operator Course Instructor, (NSPF).
1989-1995: Chairman, American Cancer Society Swim-A- Thon.
1986: Adapted Swimming Instructor for United Cerebral Palsy, Terre Haute, IN.
1984-1986: Program Director, Terre Haute Aquatic Club.
1983: Diving Safety Officer for C.A.H.E.P. Archaeological Dig in Caesarea,
Israel.
19. 1983-1986: Aquatics Coordinator, Indiana State University, Continuing
Education Department, Terre Haute, IN.
20. 1981-1983: Springboard Diving Coach, Montgomery County Department of
Recreation, Rockville, MD.
21. 1980-1981: Swimming/Diving Coach for Boys and Girls, Bethesda Chevy Chase
High School, MD.
22. 1973-1982: Swimming Professional, Chevy Chase Country Club, Chevy Chase,
MD.
23. 1976: NCAA Diving Referee. Swimming and Diving National Championships,
Washington and Jefferson College, Division III.
,.-....
4
~ f11liM NO. 2. 3
~Of 3?
/'""
24.
1977: NCAA Diving Referee, Swimming and Diving Championships
Youngstown State University, Division II.
INVENTIONS
I. Griff's Guard Station ™ A series of Lifeguard Stations for pools and
waterparks, manufactured by Paragon Aquatics, LaGrangeville, NY
1-888-KDI-SWIM.
2. The Five Minute Scanning Strategy @ A copyrighted surveillance technique for
lifeguards and other surveillance personnel, 2000. Now required by all Pool
Management Group, Star Guard and Ellis and Associates Lifeguards
(approximately 50,000 lifeguards worldwide).
PUBLICATIONS
/'""
More than 300 papers have been published in scientific, professional and popular
journals. Publications also include textbooks, tapes, and articles. External reviewer for
the American Red Cross Swimming and Diving publications. Papers have appeared in
the following publications: The N.Y. Times, Aquatics International, Parks and
Recreation Magazine, Parent Magazine, Prevention, The International Journal of Sport
Psychology, Perceptual and Motor Skills, The National Aquatic Journal, Splash
Magazine, Underwater U.S.A., Sources, Pressure, Undercurrent, SCUBA Times
Magazine, and others.
Most RECENT PUBLICATIONS
TEXTBOOKS, CHAPTERS AND VIDEOS:
1. Griffiths, Tom. The Five Minute Scannine StrateI!V@ Video.
Paragon Aquatics, LaGrangeville, NY, 2000
2. Griffiths, Tom. Better Beaches, National Recreation and Parks Association,
Reston, VA. 1999.
3. Griffiths, Tom. The Complete Swimmine Pool Reference, Mosby,
Harcourt Brace Company, June 1994.
4. Griffiths, Tom. The Swimmine Pool, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY, 1995.
5. Griffiths, Thomas 1. Sport SCUBA Divine in Depth, 2nd Edition,
Princeton Book Co., Princeton, New Jersey, 1991.
6. Griffiths, Tom. The Complete Swimming Pool Reference, ]"d Edition,
Sagamore Publishing, Champaign, IL, 2003.
"......
5
~ tll:;la 1'<<).
IWiI L g
2.3
Of 3$
~
7.
Griffiths, Tom, Steel, Don and V olgelsong, Hans. Lifeguard Behaviors and
Systematic Scanning Strategies, Drowning: New Perspectives on Intervention
and Prevention, Fletemeyer and Freas, editors, CRC Press, 1999, p. 267-279.
ARTICLES:
8. Griffiths, Tom. "Why People Drown in Guarded Pools," Expertly Speaking, DJS
Associates, Inc. FalJ/Winter 2002-2003, p. 2.
9. Griffiths, Tom. "The Vigilant Lifeguards: the Inverted U Hypotheses, PART I,"
Aquatics International. May 2002, pp.18-2l.
10. Griffiths, Tom. The Vigilant Lifeguards: the Inverted U Hypotheses, PART II,
Aquatics International, June 2002, pp.
11. Griffiths, Tom. In too Deep, Aquatics International, April 2002, p.12-13.
12. Griffiths, Tom. "Every 30 Minutes, Aquatics International, June 2001, p. 10.
13. Griffiths, Tom. "The 10 Commandments of Aquatic Risk Management,"
Australia lEA Sport Monthly Update, Edition 2, 2001, pp. 1-4.
~
14.
Griffiths, Tom. "The 10 Commandments of Aquatic Risk Management,"
Athletic Business, December 2000, pp. 132-140.
15. Griffiths, Tom. "Re-inventing the LifeGuard Chair, "Parks and Recreation
Magazine, November 2000, p. 70-71.
16. Griffiths, Tom; Hans Vogelsong and Steel, Donald. "Reducing Risks at Aquatic
Facilities through Lifeguard Training," Parks and Recreation Magazine,
November, 2000, pp. 66-73.
17. Griffiths, Tom. "Seven Deadly Sins for Aquatic Facilities," National Aquatic
Council Newsletter for NRP A, Hoffman Estates, IL, February 2000.
18. Griffiths, Tom. "Don't Ask an Expert.. .Become an Expert," Aquatics
International, March/April, 1999, p.14.
19. Griffiths, Tom. "All Along the Watchtower," Aquatics International, July/August
1998, p.14.
20. Griffiths, Tom. "Lifeguards as Educators," Parks and Recreation Magazine,
July 1995, p.32-33.
21.
Griffiths, Tom. "Penn State Survey Reveals Lifeguard Statistics," Aquatics
International, November/December, 1994, p.8.
r--
6
~rraaNO. Z..$
~Of. 38'
-,
22. Griffiths, Tom. Parks and Recreation Magazine, Editor, Aquatic Issue, July,
1995.
23. Griffiths, Tom. "Lifeguards as Educators," Parks and Recreation Magazine, pp.
32-33, July, 1995.
24. Griffiths, Tom and Griffiths, Walter. "Silent but Deadly," Recreation Magazine,
pp. 40-44, July, 1995.
25. Griffiths, Tom and Ratner, Jeffrey, MD. "Exercise Induced Asthma and Indoor
Swimming Pools," Parks and Recreation Magazine, pp. 46-51, July, 1995.
26. Griffiths, Tom. "Add a Fitness Center to Your Pool," Parks and Recreation, July
1993, pp.50-54, 83.
27. Griffiths, Tom. ttPoolside Fitness Centers Increase Pool Profits," Aquatics
International, March/April 1992, pp. 16-19.
28. Griffiths, Tom, Steel, Don and Hans Vogelsong. "The 1995 National Lifeguard
Survey: How WaterPark Lifeguards Fared" Splash Magazine, April 1996, pp.
26-28.
",-- .
29.
Griffiths, Tom and Marchese-Ragona, Silvio. "A Comparison of Five Selected
Out-of-Air Response Techniques," Sources, NAUI Diving Association News,
NovemberlDecember 1988, p. 49-52.
30. Griffiths, Tom and Marchese-Ragona, Silvio. "Out of Air Emergency Skills:
Part I," Underwater USA, October 1988, pp. 36-37.
3 L Griffiths, Tom. "Do Lifeguards do What They're Paid to Do?" The New York
Times, New Jersey Section, Sunday, July 19, 1987, p. 22.
32. Griffiths, Thomas J. "A Legalistic Approach to Training Lifeguards," National
Aquatic Journal, Vol. 3, #3 Summer 1987, p. 2-3.
",.-.-
7
~rmaHO.
PACE 30
23
Of 3~
/""""
LECTURES. SEMINARS. AND PAPERS PRESENTED AT PROFESSIONAL
MEETINGS
More than 500 lectures, seminars and papers have been presented throughout the United
States including Alaska, Canada, The Caribbean, the Middle East and New Zealand.
These meetings and conferences include: The Centers for Disease Control, The National
Recreation and Parks Association Annual Aquatics Conference, The World W aterPark
Association Conference, The Council for the National Cooperation of Aquatics,
N.A.U.I.'s International Conference on Underwater Education, Our World Underwater,
Underwater Canada, Man and the Sea Conference, Diving Equipment Manufacturer's
Associations, various State Park and Recreation Conferences and numerous others. (not
very up to date)
MOST RECENT PRESENTATIONS
1. Griffiths, Tom. "The Five Minute Scanning Strategy for Ellis and Associates
Lifeguards," National Aquatic Safety School, Indianapolis, IN., January 15,16,
2003.
2. Griffiths, Tom. llNew Challenges for Recreational Waters", Centers for Disease
Control (CDC), Decatur, GA, March 22, 2002.
/'""
(i)
4.
c9
@
7.
/'""
Griffiths, Tom. "It's NOT Just Another Day at the Beach," National and
Recreation and Park Association Congress, Phoenix, Arizona, Friday, October 13,
2000.
Griffiths, Tom. Seven Deadly Sins at Aquatic Facilities," Athletic Business
Conference, Orlando, Florida, December 1, 2000.
Griffiths, Tom. "Water Quality and Water Safety Issue at In-Land Beaches,"
National Recreation and Park Association, National Congress, Salt Lake City,
Utah, October 30, 1997
Griffiths, Tom. "Increasing Water Safety at Guarded and Un-Guarded Beaches.
National Recreation and Park Association, National Aquatic Conference, Panama
City, Florida, March 9, 1998.
Griffiths, Tom. "The Psychology and Physiology of a Potential Drownee--the
Breath Holding Swimmer" NRP A National Aquatic Conference, Palm Springs,
CA., March 10, 1996.
8.
Griffiths, Tom. "The 1995 National Lifeguard Survey: Results and
Recommendations," NRPA National Aquatic Conference, Palm Springs, CA.,
March 11, 1996.
8
2.3
Of. 38
~ ITEM f<<>.
PIIJI 3 I
~
@
,.....
9.
Griffiths, Tom. "The 5 Minute Scanning Strategy @", NRP A National Aquatic
Conference, Palm Springs, CA, March 11, 1996.
Griffiths, Tom. "Water Quality and Water Safety Issues at Swimming Beaches,"
PA Department of Health, Raystown Resort, PA, June 12, 1996.
11.
Griffiths, Tom. "Practical Aquatic Risk Management", Alaska Parks and
Recreation State Conference, Seward, Alaska, September 15-25, 1995.
12.
Griffiths, Tom. "Practical Solutions to Common Pool Problems,
NRPA National Aquatics Conference, Orlando, FL March 9, 1995.
13.
Griffiths, Tom. "The 1994 National Lifeguarding Survey", NRPA National
Aquatics Conference, Orlando, FL. March 9, 1996.
14.
Griffiths, Tom. "The 1994 National Lifeguarding Survey and the 5 Minute Scan,"
The World Waterpark National Conference, Orlando, Florida, March 25, 1995.
15.
Griffiths, Tom. "Lifeguarding and Risk Management at Lakes and Ocean
Beaches," Rhode Island Insurance Trust, Providence, Rhode Island, June 10,
1996.
16.
Griffiths, Tom. "Systematic Scanning Strategies for Lifeguards,"
Alaska Parks and Recreation State Conference, Seward, Alaska,
September 15-25,
17. Griffiths, Tom. "What Ever Happened to Common Sense in Aquatics?'," the
National Recreation and Parks Association and Aquatic Conference, Mesa, AZ,
March 25 - April 2, 1994.
18. Griffiths, Tom. "Systematic Scanning Strategies for Lifeguards: Survey Results
and Recommendations," Council for the National Cooperation of Aquatics,
Charlotte, NC, October 12, 1994
19. Griffiths, Tom and Marchese-Ragona, Silvio. "Out-of-air Emergency Ascent
Research," Diving Equipment Manufacturers Association Conference, Las Vegas,
Nevada, January 26-29, 1989.
20. Griffiths, Tom. "The Female Diver: Psychological and Physiological Concerns,"
Underwater Canada, Ontario, Canada, April 7,8,9, 1989.
21. Griffiths, Tom. "The Female Diver," Our World Underwater, Hyatt Regency,
O'Hare, Chicago, April 21-23, 1989.
22.
,,-.. ,
Griffiths, Tom. "Air-Sharing Research," International Conference on Underwater
Education, Houston, Texas, June 2-4, 1989.
9
AOINDA naa NO. 2 3
PIa 32- OF 3 ~
~
23. Griffiths, Tom. "Herod's Sunken Harbor," International Conference on
Underwater Education, Santiago College, Santa Ana, California, November 6-9,
1987.
24. Griffiths, Tom. "The Female Diver: Physiology and Psychology," Our World
Underwater Symposium, Chicago, IL, April 25, 1987.
25. Griffiths, Tom. "The Female Diver" Socio-Psychological Aspects,"
International Conference on Underwater Education, Santiago College, Santa Ana,
California, November 6-9, 1987.
26. Griffiths, Thomas J. "Your Complete Panic Prevention Program," International
Conference on Underwater Education, Florida International University, North
Miami, Florida, October 3,4,5, 1986.
27. Griffiths, Thomas J. "A Review of Psychological Research," Inter-national
Conference on Underwater Education,. Florida International University, North
Miami, Florida, October 3,4, 5, 1986.
28. Griffiths, Thomas J. "Psychological Aspects of Diving," N.A.U.I. Mid-America
Diving Workshop, Westmont, Illinois, March 22, 1986.
~
29. Griffiths, Thomas J. "Diagnosis and Treatment of Diver Stress," Diving Medicine
in Depth Symposium, Grand Cayman, B.W.!., July 11, 1985.
30. Griffiths, Thomas J. "Stress and Panic in Diving," Diving Medicine in Depth
Symposium, Grand Cayman, B.W.!., July 12, 1985.
RADIO AND TELEVISION APPEARANCES
1. Griffiths, Tom. Inside Edition with Deborah Norville and Mart Meagher, "Pool
Entrapments,"May 22,23,26,2001 (and summer 2002) on stations throughout
the USA.
2. Griffiths, Tom. Inside Edition with Deborah Norville and Mart Meagher, "Dirty
Pools" September 7, 2001 on stations throughout the USA.
3. Griffiths, Thomas J., with Sonny Jurgensen. "Swimming Tips: Proper
Breathing," P.M. Magazine, WTOP-TV, Channel 9, Washington, D.C., July 17,
1979.
4. Griffiths, Thomas J., with Sonny Jurgensen. "Swimming Tips: Drown-proofing,"
P.M. Magazine, WTOP-TV, Channel 9, Washington, D.C., July 19, 1979.
~
10
dNDAmu~. 2,3
Mia ~ 3 ~Of. Jg'
/"'"
5.
Griffiths, Thomas J., and Duane Beeson. "Swimming Safety: Of Public Interest."
Carried by 15 radio stations, May 22, 1984, 15 minute radio show.
6. Griffiths, Thomas J. "Summer Swimming Safety," Good Morning, Terre Haute,
June 12, 1984, WBAK-TV, Terre Haute, Indiana. 5 minute TV show teaching
parents how to safeguard their children from drowning during the summer.
7. Griffiths, Thomas J. "Summer Swimming Teams," Mid-Day Report, Channel 10,
WTHI-TV, Terre Haute, Indiana, April 22, 1985.
8. Griffiths, Thomas J. "Competitive Swimming for Boys and Girls,"
Channel 38, WBAK-TV, Terre Haute, Indiana, April 18, 1985.
9. Griffiths, Thomas J. "Terre Haute Aquatic Club," Mid-Day Report, Channel 10,
WTHI-TV, Terre Haute, Indiana, September 25, 1985.
10. Griffiths, Thomas J. "The Aquatics Institute at ISU, Morning News, Channel 10,
WTHI-TV, Terre Haute, Indiana, Mary 21, 1986.
11. Griffiths, Thomas J. "Of Public Interest: Summer Water Safety." WISU Radio-
FM, May 22,1986.
/""'
12.
Griffiths, Thomas, 1. "Swimming and Pool Safety", WPSX TV, Taking Note
with Patty Satalgia, April, 1997.
13. Griffiths, Thomas, J. Editorial Commentator for WMAJ Radio, Broadcast two
editorials of public interest per week. Editorials air twice daily. November 1998
to 2000.
OFFICES HELD AND PARTICIPATION
1. Chairperson, College Division, MAHPER, 1976-1977.
2. Associate Member, Undersea Medical Society, 1976-1980.
3. Aquatics Chairperson for the Wabash Valley American Red Cross Safety
Committee, 1984-1986.
4. Aquatic Chairperson, Senior Olympics of the Wabash Valley, 1983-1986.
5. Chairperson of District 7, IAHPERD, Fall; 1983-1986.
6. Coordinator, Region C, IAHPERD, Fall; 1985-1986.
7. Speakers Bureau Development Committee, IAHPERD. Spring 1984-1986.
/"'"
11
~mMi'tO. 23
MGI 3y Of3&'
r'
8.
Course Director, National YMCA, Assistant Instructor Institute, Indiana State
University, Terre Haute, Indiana, May 17, 18, 19, 1986.
9. Pennsylvania Aquatic Council, 1986-2001.
10. Editor, Pennsylvania Aquatic Council Newsletter, 1987-2001.
11. Treasurer, Pennsylvania Aquatic Council, 1988-2001.
12. President-Elect, National Recreation and Park Association (NRP A)
March 2003 - March 2004.
HONORS AND RECOGNITION
1. Southern Connecticut State University Swimming Academic Award, 1971.
2. Elected to "Who's Who Among Students in American Universities and
Colleges", 1971.
3. Certification of Appreciation by the National Association of Underwater
Instructors for Dive America Committee, 1974.
r-
4.
American Red Cross Certificate of Appreciation for 500 hours of Outstanding
Service, 1975.
5. American Red Cross Certificate of Appreciation for 1,000 hours of Outstanding
Service, 1976.
6. American Red Cross Certificate of Appreciation for 1,500 hours of Outstanding
Service, 1977.
7. Diving Referee, NCAA National Championship, Division III, 1976.
8. Diving Referee, NCAA National Championship, Division II, 1977.
9. Honorary Member, Maryland University Alumni Swimming Association, 1978.
10. Honorary "M" Club Member, University of Maryland, 1979.
11. Nominated as "Outstanding Teacher at the University of Maryland" by the
students of the College Park Campus, April 3, 1979.
12. Recipient of $5,000 Research Grant from the Dorothy Jordan Chadwick
Foundation for PhysiolPsychological Study on Underwater Archeologists in
Israel, Summer 1983.
r'"
12
M8DA IlIU NO. '2- 3
fW2 ~) OF 38
~.~.
,.-.
13.
20 year Volunteer Service Award -- American Red Cross, 1988.
14. 25 year Volunteer Service Award -- American Red Cross, 1992.
15. {{Who's Who in Aquatics- The Top 100", Aquatics International Magazine,
1997, 1998, 1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004
16. Certification of Appreciation-- from Penn State University Office of
Environmental Health and Safety for 10 years of Consecutive Service as a
member ofthe University Safety Council, 1999.
17. United States Tennis Association (UST A) for the Sarni Tennis Facility at Penn
State University, "Best CoIlege Tennis Facility in Middle States Region,"1999.
18. National Recreation and Parks Association, NRPAuExceIlence in Aquatics",
University Division, Best College Aquatic Programming in the Nation, 2000.
19. National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) Distinguished Aquatic
Professional Award, March 2003.
,.......
20. European Lifeguard Academy Friend of the Academy, awarded by the Executive
. Committee of the European Lifeguard Academy for significant contributions to
preventive lifeguarding, July 2003.
21. Paragon Aquatic Safety Award presented at the International Swimming and
Diving HaIl of Fame, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, May 7, 2004, for a lifetime or'
significant water safety efforts and accomplishments
PROFESSIONAL TRAVEL
Water Safety Inspections, Seminars and/or Underwater Expeditions to:
/'"
Ocho Rios, Jamaica
Cozumel, Mexico
Red Sea, Israel
San Salvador, Bahamas
Turks and Caicos, B. W. I.
San Salvador, Bahamas
Grand Cayman, B. W. I.
Florida Keys, U.S.A.
San Salvador, Bahamas
San Salvador, Bahamas
San Salvador, Bahamas
Caesarea Maritima, Israel
Florida Keys, U.S.A.
Florida Keys, U.S.A.
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1983
1983
13
~ffEM NO.
PAQl3t,
2-3
Of 38
---
Red Sea, Egypt
Grand Cayman, B.W.I.
Florida Keys, U.S.A.
Ginnie Springs, Florida
Grand Cayman, B. W. 1.
Ginnie Springs, Florida
Cancun, Mexico
Aruba, Netherlands
New Zealand
Ixtapa, Mexico
St. Johns, US Virgin Islands
Cancun, Mexico
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Dominican Republic
1983
1984
1985
1985
1985
1986 thru 1996
1997, 1998
1999
1999,2000
2000
2000
2001
2002
2002
WORKSHOPS PRESENTED FOR
STATE & REGIONAL AOUATIC ORGANIZATIONS
Texas 1994 Oregon
1996
Alaska 1995 Maryland 1996
Pennsylvania 1994--98 Wisconsin 1997
~ Rhode Island 1996 New Hampshire 1997
South Dakota 1995 Ohio 1998
Virginia 1996, 1997 New Jersey 1999
Aruba 1999 New Zealand 2000
Virginia 2001 Michigan 2002
New England (NET!) 2002 Connecticut 2002
Southwest Regional (NRP A) 2002 Oregon
2003
Nebraska 2003
BETTER BEACH SEMINARS (NRPA)
(first and only national program for
better beach management)
Evanston, IL
Liberty, NY
Las Vegas, NY
Newport, RI
Lima, OH
Seattle, W A
Grand Rapids, MI
Orlando, Florida
South Haven, MI
Harrisburg, P A
Denver, CO
;r-.
;1'"-
Feb. 22,2000
April 10, 2000
April 15, 2000
April 30, 2000
May 12,2000
May 18, 2000
January, 20, 2001
March 10, 2001
March 26, 2001
September 24, 2001
October 2, 2001
14
~ rraa fiO. 2 ']
PAGE 37 Of 38'
,-.,
Williamsburg, V A
Carol Stream, IL
Mankato, MN
Hyannis, MA
Tampa, FL
Albuquerque, NM
Portsmouth, NH
December 8, 2001
March 18, 2002
March 20, 2002
April 7, 2002
October 12,2002
March 8, 2003
April 1, 2003
/"
/"
15
~ I"fSlI hO.
PACI '3 $7
2-3
Of 3g