HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994 Design Review Com MinutesCITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC)
MINUTES FOR THE MEETING OF JUNE 29, 1994
TIME AND PLACE: 9 :30 A.M. AT CITY HALL, CONFERENCE ROOM A
**, k** a*** te***** s, k***********, k, k***** * * * * * * * *stea * *,t * * * *tete * * *,t *•
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Standing Vice Chairman
Brinley at 9:30 a.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Vice Chairman Brinley.
IN ATTENDANCE:
DRC MEMBERS
Pam Brinley, Vice Chairman
Ray Grage
Dan Metze
ABSENT
Gary Washburn, Chairman
Sonya Matthies
John De Gange
MINUTE ACTION
STAFF
MOVED BY METZE, SECONDED BY GRAGE AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 2 -0
WITH BRINLEY ABSTAINING TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF APRIL 27,
1994.
- None.
DESIGN APPLICATION
1. Auto - Oriented Facade Sian - E1 Baby Feliz - 100 B North
Main Street.
Mr. De Gange noted that this is a request for an auto -
oriented facade sign measuring 6' x 3' (18 square feet).
He explained that the sign would be mounted on the upper
facade above the main entry way. He noted that the
building has 18 linear feet and the sign meets the Design
Standards for the downtown Business District with respect
to size, style of lettering. Mr. De Gange stated that
staff has a concern regarding the fact that the building
was designed for an inset sign and this proposed sign is
to be mounted above the inset. He further stated that the
fluorescent yellow green color being utilized for the
border and a portion of the primary lettering is
prohibited by the standards. It is recommended that as a
condition of approval this color be repainted with an
approved color.
Vice Chairman Brinley asked if there was a representative
of Mr. Diaz the applicant. There being none Vice Chairman
Brinley stated that the sign was done without being
brought before Design Review Committee and it is her
recommendation that Mr. Diaz come in and work with staff
Page Two
Design Review Committee
June 29, 1994
to conform to the requirements of the Design Standards and
resubmit a sign that would be mounted in the indentation.
Mr. Metze stated that the fluorescent paint is not
acceptable. He further stated that the Committee had
another business replace brackets in order to cover the
indentation properly. He stated that this applicant
should do the same thing or replace the sign with one that
will go into the indentation.
Mr. Grage stated that the space is too small to do an
adequate sign; therefore, they should make the sign cover
the indentation possibly with a larger border.
It was the consensus of the Committee to create a sign
with a larger border to cover the indentation and change
the colors to conform to the Design Standards.
Vice Chairman Brinley asked that Mr..De Gange remind the
applicant that he will be appearing before the Planning
Commission at the next meeting and that he will have to
submit a color rendering and that there should be a
representative present at the meeting.
MOVED BY GRAGE, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING OF
JULY 20, 1994.
2. Single - Family Residence at 411 Langstaff - Habitat for
Humanity.
Mr. De Gange explained that this is a request to review
and approve a 1,088 square foot, three bedroom, single -
story, dwelling to be constructed at 411 Langstaff Street.
He stated that the structure would have a 420 square foot
garage. Mr. De Gange stated that the dwelling will
resemble the recommended "Bungalow" style as set by the
Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Standards. Staff
recommends that the Design Review Committee approve Minor
Design Review for the dwelling subject to Conditions of
Approval.
Mr. Joseph D. Kelly stated that his organization is a non-
profit organization and they will be building to the
specifications of the Design Standards.
Vice Chairman Brinley commended the Habitat for Humanity's
work and stated that the family that will be getting the
house will be very lucky.
Mr. Kelly invited the Committee to the dedication, ground
breaking and an introduction to the family who will be
living in the house, on the 23rd of July at 411 Langstaff.
Vice Chairman Brinley asked how the family is picked. Mr.
Kelly stated that the organization has a family selection
committee and it is done through application.
Mr. Grage stated that it would be nice if it were possible
to have one bathroom with a window in it. Mr. Kelly
stated that there will be fans in the bathrooms. He
stated that possibly a skylight would be an asset.
Mr. Metze questioned Condition No. 3 and asked about the
requirement of Class "A ". Mr. De Gange explained that UBC
(Uniform Building Code) does not require Class "A ".
Page Three
Design Review Committee
June 29, 1994
There was general discussion regarding the Class "A"
verses Class "B" roofing materials. Mr. Kelly stated that
it is their request that the Committee give them some
latitude since they are using donated materials.
Mr. Metze clarified the fencing requirement of Condition
No. 7. He suggested that a steel post fronted by boards
be used instead of 4 x 41s.
NOTE: TITLE 17.14.130 E
reads:
Roofing: All new dwelling
units, and dwelling units
which are completely
reroofed, shall
utilize roofing materials
with a
minimum Class
"A" fire rating.
MOVED BY METZE, SECONDED BY GRAGE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR
THE DWELLING LOCATED AT 411 NORTH LANGSTAFF, SUBJECT TO
CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS WITH CHANGES IN CONDITION NO. 3 TO
UTILIZE CLASS "A" ROOFING AND STEEL POSTS TO BE USED
INSTEAD OF 4 x 4 WOOD POSTS:
CONDITIONS - PLANNING DIVISION
1. Design Review approval will lapse and be void unless
building permits are issued within one (1) year of the
Design Review Committee approval date. Yearly extensions
may be granted by the Community Development Director or
designee upon request thirty (30) days prior to
expiration.
2. Conditions of approval shall be reproduced on page one of
building plans prior to their acceptance by Building
Division. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior
to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release
of utilities.
3. Applicant shall use roofing materials with a minimum of
Class "A" fire rating. If asphalt roofing material is
used on sloped roofs it shall be of the quality of
Presidential Shake three dimensional shingles. Roofing
material to be used shall be subject to the approval of
the Community Development Manager or designee, prior to
issuance of building permits.
4. The project shall connect to sewer if a sewer line is
within 200 feet of the project boundary unless it is
demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Chief Building
Official that this is infeasible. If the project does not
connect to sewer, applicant shall submit a Soils Report
which includes a sewage disposal plan referenced to the
grading plan and approved by the Riverside County Health
Department.
5. Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the City
Street Tree List, a maximum of thirty feet (301) apart and
twenty four inch (2411) box in size as to meet the approval
of the Community Development Manager or designee.
6. All exterior air condition units, shall be ground mounted
and screened so that they are not visible from neighboring
property or public streets.
Page Four
Design Review Committee
June 29, 1994
7. A six -foot (61) high fence shall be constructed along the
side and rear property lines and shall conform to Section
17.14.080 (Fences and Walls), subject to the approval of
the Community Development Manager or designee prior to
issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. The use of chain -
link fencing detracts from the overall 1920's concept,
therefore is prohibited. Wall and fences over (31) feet
in height in front yard areas are strongly discouraged.
It is the overall intent to maintain a smooth transition
between public and private spaces, and to maintain a
"friendly" community identity.
8. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall
provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake
Elsinore Unified School District have been paid.
9. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall pay
park -in -lieu fee in effect at time of building permit
issuance.
10. The address (in numerals at least four inches (4" high)
shall be displayed near the entrance and be visible from
the front of the unit.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
11. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a
condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code at the time a building permits is issued.
12. Dedicate underground water rights to the City (Municipal
Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.52.030). Document can be
obtained from the Engineering Department.
13. Pay all Capital Improvements and Plan Check fees
(Municipal Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.37; Resolution No.
85 -26).
14. Submit a "Will- Serve" letter to the City Engineering
Department, from the applicable water agency stating that
water and sewer arrangements have been made for this
project. Submit this letter prior to applying for
building permit.
15. Construct all off -site public works improvements per
approved street plans (Municipal Code, Title 12). Plans
must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to
issuance of building permits (Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
16.34).
16. Street improvements plans and specifications shall be
prepared by a Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be
designed and constructed to Riverside County Road
Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code 12.04 and 16.34).
17. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit
issued by the Engineering Department for construction of
off -site public works improvements (Municipal Code, Title
12, Chapter 12.08 and Resolution 83 -78).
18. All compaction reports, grade specifications, monument
certification (with tie notes delineated on 8 1/2" X 11"
mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Department
before final inspection of off -site improvements are
scheduled and approved.
Page Five
Design Review Committee
June 29, 1994
19. Arrangements for relocation of utilities company
facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway
or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner
or his agent.
20. On -site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or
accepted by the adjacent property owner by a letter of
drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement.
21. All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed
through site or provided for by a method approved by the
City Engineer.
22. If grading exceeds 50 cubic yards, grading plans shall be
prepared by a Civil Engineer and approved prior to any
grading, applicant shall obtain a grading permit and post
appropriate security.
23. Developer to provide a Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) elevation certificate prior to building permit
issuance.
3. Awning Sian (Modification to an Existing Awning Sian) -
Antigue Corner - 106 W. Graham.
Mr. De Gange explained that this is a request for a
modification of an existing awning sign to reflect the new
business name. Currently the sign reads "Around The
Corner" in white four inch letters painted on a forest
green awning above the doorway and main display window at
106 W. Graham. The applicant wishes to paint over a
portion of the signage on the awning and change the name.
Vice Chairman Brinley asked if the name had been painted
over. Mr. De Gange stated that it had with the hunter
green color to cover the white lettering. He stated that
the paint blended with the color of the awning. Vice
Chairman Brinley asked if that would hold up through the
rain and sun that will affect the awning. Mr. De Gange
stated that he did not know.
Mr. Metze asked about the cost of painting the entire
awning, or if it is effective to do only the sign.
Vice Chairman Brinley stated that painting the entire
awning would create a situation where it would fade
evenly.
Mr. De Gange stated his concern regarding the fire
retardant qualities of the awning if it were painted over.
Vice Chairman Brinley stated that she would like to see
this item continued until staff could investigate the fire
retardant properties of the awning if the entire awning is
painted. She stated that if the awning can be painted
then the Committee can sign off on the project.
MOVED BY GRAGE, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE AWNING WITH STAFF
WORKING WITH THE APPLICANT TO PAINT THE ENTIRE AWNING IF
POSSIBLE AND IF NOT THEN THE NAME TO BE PAINTED OVER WITH
A PAINT TO MATCH THE EXISTING AWNING TO BE APPROVED BY TWO
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT.
Page Six
Design Review Committee
June 29, 1994
BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATIONS
1. Maior Leaaue Auto Bodv and Repair - 161 South Main Street.
Mr. De Gange explained that this is a request to approve
a license for the operation of an automotive repair and
body shop business at 161 S. Main Street. The previous
business conducted within this building was Marshall's
Transmission Service. Mr. De Gange explained that this
building was designed for automotive repair and would not
be suitable for retail sales. He stated that the Design
Review Committee set two conditions on the previous
business as follows: 1) No outside storage would be
permitted. If any vehicles are to be kept overnight they
are to be kept inside; 2) The DRC will review the
Business License in five (5) years to determine if the
building would better conform to retail use to be
compatible with the surrounding businesses. He suggested
that it might be wise to condition the applicant in the
same manner.
Mr. Grage stated that he has a potential conflict with
this project and feels that he should abstain from
discussion and decision.
THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE RECESSED FOR FIVE MINUTES.
THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE RECONVENED.
Mr. Marshall stated the building is currently being used
as a transmission service shop and is suitable for an
automotive repair shop. He asked that the Design Review
Committee allow him to lease his building to the new
people since the use of the building will not be changed.
Vice Chairman Brinley stated the building is located in a
sensitive area and she is not in favor of an auto -body
shop at this time, which includes painting of the vehicle.
That type of use also proposes an environmental problem.
Mr. Marshall asked if he could transfer his license for
the same type of auto service that has been operating in
the building. He stated that it would be transmission and
general auto repair.
Mr. Metze stated that if the license were for an auto body
shop then it would open the way for a full paint shop. He
stated that he would prefer it to remain a transmission
and auto repair shop.
Vice Chairman Brinley asked if Mr. Marshall would remain
the landlord of the building. Mr. Marshall stated that he
would. She asked if the business would be operated under
the same conditions. Mr. Marshall stated that it would.
Vice Chairman Brinley reminded all parties concerned about
the signage requirements. She stated that they would have
to provide a rendering of the sign and a color chart.
MOVED BY METZE, SECONDED BY BRINLEY AND CARRIED BY A VOTE
OF 2 -0 WITH GRAGE ABSTAINING TO APPROVE THE BUSINESS
LICENSE FOR MAJOR LEAGUE AUTO REPAIR, ELIMINATING THE WORD
BODY FROM ALL BUSINESS REFERENCES WITH ALL PREVIOUS
CONDITIONS TO APPLY TO THIS BUSINESS.
Page Seven
Design Review Committee
June 29, 1994
2. Rosbella Florist - 106 North Main Street.
Vice Chairman Brinley stated that she felt that a florist
shop was a good change for the Downtown area.
MOVED BY GRAGE, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE BUSINESS LICENSE FOR
ROSBELLA FLORIST LOCATED AT 106 NORTH MAIN STREET.
3. Back In The Day (Antiques and Collectibles) - 120 1/2
North Main Street.
Mr. De Gange explained that this is a request to approve
a license for an antique and collectibles shop. He
explained that the building had been used for that purpose
before.
Mr. Metze asked if they had been informed what
collectibles are. Mr. De Gange explained that he had
informed the applicants that there were no thrift stores
or junk shops allowed and that they understood.
Vice Chairman Brinley stated that her concerns are the
definition of antiques and that she does not want to see
a second hand store.
Mr. De Gange defined antiques and collectibles and stated
that thrift stores are stores where items are donated.
Vice Chairman Brinley stated that she would like to award
the business license with the condition that it must come
back in a certain time frame for review.
Mr. Metze asked if the business license is reviewed when
it expires. Mr. De Gange stated that unless it is clearly
stated that the business is subject to review it will
automatically be renewed upon payment of fee.
Vice Chairman Brinley stated that if the business license
states subject to review it gives staff to the ability to
inspect and be sure the business is in proper operation.
Mr. Metze stated that possibly this should be an automatic
statement for any business license which is for antiques
and collectibles.
Vice Chairman Brinley stated that on the application and
license there should be conditions which state no used
clothing, junk or used appliances and license subject to
review. She explained that this will give staff the
ability to close the business down if it is not in proper
operation.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ASKED THAT LAURA'S ANTIQUE MALL, 161
SOUTH MAIN STREET, BE PLACED UNDER REVIEW THE NEXT TIME THEIR
BUSINESS LICENSE IS DUE TO BE RENEWED.
MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE BUSINESS
LICENSE FOR BACK IN THE DAY (ANTIQUES AND COLLECTIBLES)
LOCATED AT 120 1/2 NORTH MAIN STREET WITH THE CONDITIONS
THAT THERE BE NO USED CLOTHING, JUNK OR USED APPLIANCES
SOLD OR DISPLAYED WITH LICENSE TO BE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AT
THE TIME OF RENEWAL.
Page Eight
Design Review Committee
June 29, 1994
4. Antique Corner (Antiques and Collectibles) - 106 West
Graham Avenue.
Mr. De Gange asked if the Design Review Committee would
like to deal with this shop in the same manner as the
previous shop. Vice Chairman Brinley stated that they
would.
MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY
UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE BUSINESS
LICENSE FOR ANTIQUE CORNER (ANTIQUES AND COLLECTIBLES)
LOCATED AT 106 WEST GRAHAM AVENUE WITH THE CONDITIONS THAT
THERE BE NO USED CLOTHING, JUNK OR USED APPLIANCES SOLD OR
DISPLAYED WITH LICENSE TO BE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AT THE TIME
OF RENEWAL.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
1.
Mr. De Gange stated that there is still an issue with the
signage at 141 North Main Street and it is still not in
conformance. He stated that the business was sold and is
now operating without a license and the signage is still
a problem.
Vice Chairman Brinley stated that the business must be
cited by Code Enforcement.
Mr. Metze stated that if she is selling without a business
license then she does not have a tax number and is in
violation. He stated that the State Board of Equalization
will not issue a number without a business license.
2. Masonic Lodge, 114 East Graham.
Mr. De Gange stated that the Masonic Lodge is redoing
stucco on the building and there was no building permit
issued. Vice Chairman Brinley stated that the Building
Department should be aware of the fact that this building
is in a special district and should be handled differently
than other areas of the City. She asked that Building
Department, Code Enforcement and Planning Department be
made aware of this problem and make sure that the Historic
Downtown Business Area be given special attention. Mr. De
Gange stated that in his opinion nothing significant is
being done to the building, but he felt that he should
bring this issue to the Committee to keep them informed.
Vice Chairman Brinley stated that she will bring this
issue to the attention of the Planning Commission and the
City Planner.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Mr. Ali, 200 West Graham, Car Wash - Gas Station, stated that
the place had stood empty for quite some time until he bought
it nine months ago. He stated that he has increased business
and contributed to the sales tax for the City. He explained
that the existing office is only big enough for one person and
is a danger to the customers when they are trying to pay. He
would like to turn one of the bays into an office so that he
can do his business properly.
Page Nine
Design Review Committee
June 29, 1994
Vice Chairman Brinley stated that he shoul d
Gange and bring the item before Planning
explained that part of the conditions would
nor wine and beer sold and that the facility
office only.
STAFF COMMENTS - None.
COMMITTEE COMMENTS
work with Mr. De
Commission. She
be no mini - market
will be used as an
Mr. Grage stated that he has enjoyed sitting on this Committee
and he commended the Planning Department and that he looks
forward to the future improvements that he knows will occur.
Vice Chairman Brinley stated that she appreciated Mr. Grage's
input and commended him for his service and dedication to the
City.
Vice Chairman Brinley stated that she would like to see staff
take a hard line at the front counter. She stated that she
wants it stressed to the applicants that they are appearing
before a formal body and that they must be present and prepared
with proper renderings and exhibits that must be professional.
She explained that Planning Commission has been instructed to
follow the Design Standards closely and that the exhibits must
be of a professional quality.
Mr. Metze concurred with Mrs. Brinley regarding the standards.
He stated that he personally will take a very hard line in
regard to future project and the type of exhibits that are
presented.
Mr. Metze thanked Mr. Grage for his dedication to the City and
his input. He stated that he felt that the Planning Commission
would appreciate it if he would continue to give input to the
Planning Commission in regard to his ideas on Main Street.
MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AT 11:31 A.M.
PAM BRINLEY, VICE CHAIRMAN
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
SECRETARY
MINUTES OF
LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
JULY 20, 1994
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
SCHEDULED FOR JULY 20, 1994, WAS CALLED FOR LACK OF AGENDA ITEMS.
Respectfully submitted,
L nda Grindstaff
Secretary
MINUTES OF
LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
AUGUST 3, 1994
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 3, 1994, WAS CALLED FOR LACK OF AGENDA ITEMS.
Respectfully sLPmitted,
Linda Grin staff
Secretary
MINUTES
REGULAR DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1994
The Design Review Committee Meeting was called to order at 9:02
p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COMMITTEE MEMBERS: BULLARD, NEFF, WILSEY, METZE
ABSENT: COMMITTEE MEMBERS: BRINLEY
Also present were Assistant Planner Villa and Engineering Manager
O'Donnell.
In the absence of an official Chairperson Commissioner Bullard
served as Acting Chair and conducted the meeting.
MINUTE ACTION
Moved by Metze, Seconded by Wilsey and carried by a vote of 4 -0 to
received and file Minutes of June 29, July 20 and August 3, 1994.
DESIGN APPLICATIONS
1. Auto - Oriented Facade Sign - E1 Baby Feliz - 100 -B North Main
Street (Continued from June 29, 1994). Vice Chairman Bullard
asked for a motion to accept the withdrawal.
MOVED BY NEFF SECONDED BY WILSEY AND CARRIED BY 4 -0 VOTE TO
WITHDRAW THE APPLICATION FOR AN AUTO - ORIENTED FACADE SIGN AT
100 -B NORTH MAIN STREET.
BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATIONS
None
At this time, Commissioner Bullard moved that the selection of
Chairman and Vice Chairman for the DRC be postponed to the next
regular session, September 7, 1994; so that all members are present
and so that the two seats to be vacated are filled.
Mr. Wilsey stated that he would not be present at the meeting of
September 7th.
Mr. Neff stated he would be out of town September 3rd to the 13th.
Assistant Planner Villa informed the members that the mayor is
currently reviewing the applications for the two open seats on the
Commission and he will set meetings with those applicants next week
and could have an announcement the first Council meeting in
September.
Commissioner Bullard amended his motion to continue the selection
of Chairman and Vice Chairman of the DRC to the meeting of
September 21, 1994, second by Mr. Metze and carried by a 4 -0 vote.
STAFF COMMENTS
None
COMMITTEE COMMENTS
None
MOVED BY NEFF, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY 4 -0 VOTE TO ADJOURN
THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AT 9:12 P.M.
Res ectfull submitted _ ,Approved,
.L da Gr'ndstaff Richard Bullard
Recording Secretary Planning Commission, Vice Chairman
MINUTES
REGULAR DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1994
The Design Review Committee Meeting was called to order at 7:25
p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COMMITTEE MEMBERS: BULLARD, METZE AND BRINLEY
ABSENT: COMMITTEE MEMBERS: WILSEY AND NEFF
Also present were: Senior Planner Morita, Associate Planner De
Gange, Assistant Planner Villa and Engineering Manager O'Donnell.
In the absence of an official Chairperson Chairwoman Brinley served
as Acting Chair and conducted the meeting.
MINUTE ACTION
Moved by Bullard, Seconded by Metze and carried by a vote of 3 -0 to
continue minute action to the meeting of September 21, 1994.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. Csaba Koltai, Main Street Bakery, 111 North Main Street,
commented on receiving a third notice of violation for window
signage. He stated that two of the notices have been resolved as
the signs have been removed, but he is contesting the third notice.
He presented photographs and actual exhibits of the proposed
signage.
Ms. Brinley informed Mr. Koltai that during PUBLIC COMMENTS the
Committee could not address the matter and suggested that he meet
with Associate Planner De Gange and have the item agendized for the
next meeting.
Mr. De Gange asked whether this should be placed on the next agenda
as an informational item. Ms. Brinley stated this item will
probably require a Staff Report and background information.
DESIGN APPLICATIONS
1. Window Sian - 117 -B South Main Street -
Mr. De Gange explained that the request is for a painted
window sign measuring 2.5' x 4' (10 square feet) and will
occupy approximately 24% of the window face. He noted that
the building has 13 feet of linear frontage and the sign meets
the Design Standards with respect to size, style of lettering
and color with one possible exception; the reddish color tint
may not be considered one of the approved colors (white,
black, silver, gold). He then informed the Committee that
staff is recommending continuance of this item to September
21, 1994, as the paint chip for the proposed red color has yet
to be submitted.
Ms. Brinley stated that she concurs with the continuation
since the applicant or a representative is not present, and
the need to see the color chip, actual color proposed for the
primary lettering.
Ms. Brinley asked for concurrence from the Committee to
continue this item. Mr. Metze stated that from the workshop
he got the distinct impression that a very hard line approach
is to be taken, and inquired whether the proposal should be
denied. The Committee concurred with continuation.
PAGE TWO - DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING - SEPTEMBER 7, 1994
MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY A 3 -0 VOTE
TO CONTINUE THE WINDOW SIGN FOR 117 -B SOUTH MAIN STREET TO THE
MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1994 TO ALLOW FOR THE SUBMITTAL OF A
COMPLETE PACKAGE, COLOR RENDERING, PAINT CHIP, AND THE
ATTENDANCE OF THE APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE AT THE MEETING.
Mr. Bullard suggested that staff do their best to inform the
people to stay within the guidelines of the DRC.
BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATIONS
117 -B South Main Street - Finders Keepers Gift Shop - Ronald
& Alice Klier and Wendy Buck
Mr. De Gange explained this is a request to approve a business
license to operate a gift shop. This building has been vacant
for a considerable amount of time and there is no record as
to what type of business occupied this unit in the past. He
explained that the use is consistent with the uses allowed in
the C -1 and C -O Zoning Districts and is not prohibited by the
Historic Elsinore Design Standards. He noted that staff is
concerned with antiques and previously owned collectibles also
being sold, and recommended that a condition be placed on the
business license to prohibit the sale of used clothing,
appliances or "thrift- store" items.
Mr. Bullard commented on staff's recommendation stating that
he would like this condition followed to the letter. He then
asked for something in writing defining antiques and
collectibles, would like some guidelines.
Ms. Brinley asked if this condition could not be made a
standard condition.
MOVED BY BULLARD, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY A 3 -0 VOTE
TO APPROVE THE BUSINESS LICENSE FOR FINDERS KEEPERS GIFT SHOP
AT 117 -B SOUTH MAIN STREET WITH A CONDITION TO BE PLACED ON
THE BUSINESS LICENSE PROHIBITING THE SALE OF USED CLOTHING,
APPLIANCES OR "THRIFT- STORE" ITEMS ON THE PREMISES.
3. 136 North Main Street - Blue Moon Anticues
Mr. De Gange explained this is a request to approve a business
license to operate an antique and collectible shop. A
ceramic /gift shop was previously located at this address. He
explained that the use is consistent with the uses allowed in
the C -1 and C -O Zoning Districts and is not prohibited by the
Historic Elsinore Design Standards. He noted that staff is
concerned with antiques and previously owned collectibles also
being sold, and recommended that a condition be placed on the
business license to prohibit the sale of used clothing,
appliances or "thrift- store" items.
Mr. Metze asked how this was agendized if there is no
business license application. Mr. De Gange explained that in
most cases people are unaware that they are in a Historic
Overlay District, and that there is a Design Review Committee
that oversees and approves business licenses. He explained
that most of the owners on Main Street are establishing long
term leases and people are leery of signing long -term leases
without getting approval first.
Mr. Bullard stated that his question was answered.
Ms. Brinley stated that she has no problem as long as the
condition remains as written.
PAGE THREE - DESIGN REVIEW
MEETING - SEPTEMBER 7, 1994
MOVED BY METZE, SECONDED BY BULLARD AND CARRIED BY A 3 -0 VOTE
TO APPROVE THE BUSINESS LICENSE FOR BLUE MOON ANTIQUES AT 136
NORTH MAIN STREET WITH A CONDITION TO BE PLACED ON THE
BUSINESS LICENSE PROHIBITING THE SALE OF USED CLOTHING,
APPLIANCES OR "THRIFT- STORE" ITEMS ON THE PREMISES.
4. 148 South Main Street - Chiropractic Rehab Center
Mr. De Gange explained this is a request to approve a business
license to operate a chiropractors office. A medical supply
business was previously located at this address; this building
has been vacant for approximately 1.5 to 2 years. He
explained that the use is consistent with the uses allowed in
the C -1 and C -O Zoning Districts and is not prohibited by the
Historic Elsinore Design Standards.
A brief discussion was held on the exact location, and whether
the applicant was advised that the signage would need to come
back before the DRC prior to being erected.
MOVED BY BULLARD, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY A 3 -0 VOTE
TO APPROVE THE BUSINESS LICENSE FOR CHIROPRACTIC REHAB CENTER
AT 148 SOUTH MAIN STREET.
Mr. Bullard stated that with approval of the business
license(s) that the applicant(s) should be made aware that
they have to come back before the DRC for approval of any
signage.
STAFF COMMENTS
Mr. De Gange informed the Committee that the business license for
Laura's Antique Mall recently came up for renewal. The new
business license would be conditioned to meet the same condition as
imposed on other businesses or antique stores. Subsequently, she
has informed staff that she cannot meet this condition and will be
moving out. A three month time period was .given to her to move,
which was approximately one month ago.
Mr. Morita suggested a standard be established for signage. It was
suggested that this be incorporated into the business license
application along with the condition to prohibit the sale of used
clothing, appliances or "thrift- store" items.
Ms. Brinley stated that if formal action is required, then it
should be agendized for the next meeting. This is something that
should start as soon as possible.
Mr. Metze inquired about reformatting the business license for the
Historic Overlay District.
Mr. Bullard suggested a supplemental sheet be attached to the
business license, which is signed and dated.
COMMISSION /COMMITTEE COMMENTS
Commissioner /Committee Member Bullard
Commented that the DRC meetings will be a new challenge and very
interesting.
Commissioner /Committee Member Metze
Asked staff to provide background information, by the next meeting,
on the Main Street Bakery.
PAGE FOUR - DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING - SEPTEMBER 7, 1994
Inquired whether the election DRC officers was postponed.
Ms. Brinley explained that this was postponed until the new
Commissioners were appointed.
Commissioner /Committee Member Brinley
Asked that Mr. De Gange inform the people that professional
presentations need to be submitted to the Design Review Committee,
and that the applicant or a representative should be present at the
meeting.
Reminded the Commissioners of the APA Planning Commissioners
Workshop scheduled for October 1, 1994, in Fontana.
Commissioner /Committee Member Wilsey
Absent
Commissioner /Committee Member Neff
Absent
ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY BULLARD, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY A 3 -0 VOTE TO
ADJOURN THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AT 8:15 P.M.
Planning Commission,
Rrnda tfully flbmitted
L Grind staff
Recording Secretary
MINUTES
REGULAR DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 1994
********************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
The Design Review Committee Meeting was called to order at 7:11
p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: BULLARD, NEFF, WILSEY, METZE AND BRINLEY
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
Also present were: City Planner Leslie and Associate Planner De
Gange.
In the absence of an official Chairperson Chairwoman Brinley served
as Acting Chair and conducted the meeting.
MINUTE ACTION
Moved by Wilsey, Seconded by Metze and carried by a vote of 4 -0
with Brinley abstaining to approve the Minutes of August 17, 1994,
as submitted.
Moved by Metze, Seconded by Bullard and carried by a vote of 3 -0
with Neff and Wilsey abstaining to approve the Minutes of September
7, 1994, as submitted.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There being no request to speak, Ms. Brinley closed the PUBLIC
COMMENTS Section.
DESIGN APPLICATIONS
1.
Mr. De Gange explained the request was continued to allow for
the submittal of a complete package and the applicant's
presence at the meeting. He referred to the sample colors for
the sign's lettering provided by the sign maker. He further
explained that the request is for a painted window sign
measuring 2.5' x 41, and will occupy approximately 24% of the
window face. The sign was to have gold lettering with a
reddish tint, teal and gray marbled accenting the middle and
black secondary lettering. The sign meets the Design
Standards with respect to size, style of lettering and color
with one possible exception, the main lettering.
Mr. De Gange stated that based on the submitted color sample,
it is staff's recommendation that the applicant be instructed
to stay with the approved colors: gold, silver, black or
white, as the proposed colors do not meet the criteria; or
require the applicant to submit an additional color sample and
come back before the DRC; or, if the DRC is confident, allow
staff to approve the additional color if one of the approved
colors for window signage.
Discussion was held on the proposed color samples; compliance
with existing Guidelines, and whether the Committee would
accept staff's discretion in approving said sign using the
existing standard colors.
It was the consensus of the Committee to accept staff's
discretion in approving said colors, utilizing the standard
colors for approval.
PAGE TWO - DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 21, 1994
MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO AUTHORIZE STAFF TO APPROVE THE WINDOW
SIGNAGE FOR 117 -B SOUTH MAIN STREET WITH DIRECTION TO WORK
WITH THE APPLICANT AND STAY WITHIN THE GUIDELINES AND NOT COME
BACK BEFORE THE DRC UNLESS THERE IS DEVIATION FROM THE
APPROVED STANDARDS.
BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATIONS
NONE
INFORMATIONAL
2. Main Street Bakery - 111 North Main Street Mr. Csaba Koltai
Mr. De Gange stated staff was directed, at the last meeting,
to provided background information and status on the issuance
of a temporary banner permit and notice of violation. He
explained that Mr. Koltai received approval for the banner on
April 29, 1994. Based on the current DRC Standards this
banner would have expired May 31, 1994, approximately. Prior
to the updated standards that were put into place June 21,
1994, the Design Standards state that temporary signage would
be governed by Title 17. Tile 17 allows temporary signage
based on the applicant gaining a permit on a monthly basis.
Policy has been not to charge a fee for sign permits in the
downtown area; therefore, a fee was not assessed. However,
once the permit expires, it is the applicant's responsibility
to renew it, which was not done and the notice of violation
was issued.
Ms. Brinley asked how long the banner has been up. Mr. De
Gange stated the banner has been up since April 29th.
Mr. Wilsey commented that the standards changed since the
banner was put up.
Mr. Metze commented that the old standards required renewal
once a month.
Mr. Koltai, Main Street Bakery, stated he went to City Hall
and asked for the procedures prior to erecting the banner, and
was informed there would be no fee and that the banner could
be up for 30 days, after which the permit could be renewed
every 30 days, indefinitely. With this knowledge, the banner
was purchased. He stated that he went in 2 -3 times and told
them (staff) that he wanted to keep the banner up, and that he
was not notified that the rules changed in June.
Discussion was held on the notice of violation and the date
issued; there being no fees involved; whether the permit had
been renewed every 30 days, and this item scheduled for the
October 6th Nuisance Abatement Hearing.
Mr. De Gange explained that Mr. Koltai need only complete a
new application to comply with the updated standards, and he
could have the banner up for another 30 days. However,
determination would need to be made as to how many more times
he would be allowed.
Ms. Brinley asked if an application is completed whether the
year could start in 30 days, and allowed 4 times a year.
Mr. Wilsey commented that it should remain on the calendar
year; otherwise, it is difficult to control. Basically, this
is a mute point this late in the year. Lets work with the
applicant for the balance of this year and January 1st we
start anew. Asked Mr. Koltai if he was agreeable.
PAGE THREE - DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 21, 1994
Mr. Koltai stated he was agreeable.
Mr. Leslie stated the four 30 day periods would probably start
as of the adoption of the current Guidelines in June, as
opposed to April. From April through June it was under the
old Guidelines and starting late June it came under the new
Guidelines. He recommended that June be prorated and all of
July, August, September and a portion of October would be
under the current Guidelines, then the sign would have to come
down and could not be placed back until January.
Mr. Metze asked if there was not a standard on notifying the
public. Mr. Leslie explained the noticing requirements.
It was the consensus of the Committee to go with staff's
recommendation. Mr. Koltai was asked if this was agreeable
and if he understood.
Mr. Koltai stated he understands and that he really did not
need the banner, it was the principle.
3. Definition of Antiques and Collectibles
Mr. Leslie stated staff utilized Webster's Dictionary for
definitions of antiques, collectibles, and thrift stores. He
stated staff will be doing an informal survey in the downtown
area of the existing antique stores to try to make some
determination of the percentage of items that are actually
antique and meet this definition. Possibly, staff would bring
back to the DRC an amended definition of antiques and
collectibles.
STAFF COMMENTS
City Planner Leslie commented on the following:
1. General Plan Clean -up - Questions have come up on the Housing
Element. City Council asked to have another study session on
the Housing Element and to have our consultant Ralph Castaneda
at this study session, which has not been scheduled.
2. Lake Edge Specific Plan - City Council has asked for another
study session to look specifically at land uses along
Lakeshore Drive, on the lake side. Ballew & Associates has
been asked to do a study regarding development potential along
Lakeshore Drive. Once, this study is completed a study
session will be scheduled to review the results.
Mr. De Gange and Mr. Leslie congratulated Ms. Brinley on her
appointment to the City Council. We will miss her vision, wisdom
and compassion on both the Commission and DRC.
COMMISSION /COMMITTEE COMMENTS
Commissioner /Committee Member Bullard
Congratulated Ms. Brinley on her appointment to the City Council
and wished her best of luck.
Commissioner /Committee Member Neff
Stated it was a pleasure working with Ms.. Brinley the past two
years.
Commissioner /Committee Member Metze
Thanked Ms. Brinley for her assistance and guidance for the past
year and a half.
PAGE FOUR - DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 21, 1994
Commissioner/Committee-Member Wilse
Congratulated Ms. Brinley on her appointment to the City Council
and stated that she had the love and support of the Commission.
Commissioner /Committee Member Brinley
Announced that with her appointment to City Council she will
resign her position on the Planning Commission /Design Review
Committee, and submitted a letter of resignation for the Mayor's
acceptance. She then thanked the Commissioners and staff for their
support over the years.
MOVED BY NEFF, SECONDED BY WILSEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF
THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AT
8:05 P.M.
p oved,
Pamela ion, e
Planning Commission, Chairwoman
Resp ctfully s bmitted
inda Gri staff�f/
Recording Secretary
MINUTES
REGULAR DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 5, 1994
The Design Review Committee Meeting was called to order at 7:40
p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COMMITTEE MEMBERS: MATTHIES, NEFF, WILSEY, METZE AND
BULLARD
ABSENT: COMMITTEE MEMBERS: NONE
Also present were: City Planner Leslie and Associate Planner De
Gange.
MINUTE ACTION
Moved by Bullard, Seconded by Neff and carried by a vote of 4 -0
with Matthies abstaining to approve the Minutes of September 21,
1994, as submitted.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There being no request to speak, Chairman Metze closed the PUBLIC
COMMENTS Section.
DESIGN APPLICATIONS
NONE
BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATIONS
NONE
STAFF COMMENTS
City Planner Leslie welcomed Ericka Matthies, newest member of the
Planning Commission /DRC, and welcomed back Al Wilsey and Daniel
Metze, the two returning members.
COMMISSION /COMMITTEE COMMENTS
Commissioner /Committee Member Bullard
Welcomed Ericka Matthies to the Planning Commission /DRC and
welcomed back Al Wilsey and Dan Metze.
Commissioner /Committee Member Neff
Nothing to report.
Commissioner /Committee Member Matthies
Nothing to report.
Commissioner /Committee Member Metze
Welcomed Ericka Matthies to the Planning Commission /DRC.
Commented that he will be working with staff to make the DRC
Committee and himself more available to the downtown businesses.
PAGE TWO - DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES - OCTOBER 5, 1994
Commissioner /Committee Member Wilsey
Welcomed Ericka Matthies to the Planning Commission /DRC.
Suggested the Commission /DRC members get together and tour some of
the single - family residential neighborhoods and assess what has
been done in the past, and gain ideas on how we can improve in the
future.
Mr. Bullard inquired about a workshop.
A brief discussion ensued on the need to set a date and time for a
workshop or group tour. The New Brown Act requirements concerning
group tours, and providing a list of projects to each member, which
would allow individuals to tour, should the Brown Act prohibit
participation of a group tour.
Mr. Neff suggested this be expanded to include other communities
and not just City of Lake Elsinore examples. Suggested several
field trips over a period of time, or even a list of projects to
look at. He stated that he would compile a list of projects and
present this at the next meeting.
City Planner Leslie stated that he would research the Brown Act and
report back.
ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY WILSEY, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF
THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AT
7:49 P.M.
Approved,
T)0
Daniel Metze
Chairman
�Resp ctfully submitted
Linda Grindstaff
Recording Secretary
MINUTES
REGULAR DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 19, 1994
The Design Review Committee Meeting was called to order at 7:44
p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COMMITTEE MEMBERS: NEFF, MATTHIES, WILSEY, BULLARD, AND
METZE
ABSENT: COMMITTEE MEMBERS: NONE
Also present were: City Planner Leslie, Associate Planner De Gange
and Associate Planner Villa.
MINUTE ACTION
Moved by Bullard, Seconded by Wilsey and carried by a vote of 5 -0
to approve the Minutes of October 5, 1994, as submitted.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There being no request to speak, Chairman Metze closed the PUBLIC
COMMENTS Section.
DESIGN APPLICATIONS
1. 316 North Main Street - Elsinore Hot Springs Health Resort -
Han Lee
Mr. De Gange explained that the proposal is to replace and /or
change the face of an existing freestanding pole sign; to
extend the height of an existing 6 -foot high chain link fence
with two -feet of barbed wire; to re -roof all existing
structures on -site with an asphalt roofing material, and; to
replace all exterior windows and approximately half of the
doors, which had not been replaced at an earlier time.
Chairman Metze asked if the applicant was present and if there
were any concerns.
Mr. Han Lee stated he would utilize the roofing material and
color approved by the Committee. He then stated that he is
requesting to extend the existing six -foot chain link fence,
along the property's boundary on Pottery and Ellis, with two -
feet of barbed wire for security purposes. Mr. Lee explained
that the proposed chain link fencing alteration would run
about $500.00 whereas wrought iron would be approximately
$20,000 and is cost prohibitive.
Mr. Neff stated that he had no problem with the pole sign and
inquired about the colors proposed. Commented on the roofing
material, prefers the grayish green roofing material. He then
commented on the alteration to the existing chain link
fencing, does not feel that barbed wire is appropriate and
suggested that landscaping be used as an alternative. Asked
if the Lehr property on Collier could be used as an example
for security fencing.
Ms. Matthies asked for a translation of the Chinese /Korean
characters at the bottom of the sign. Mr. Lee explained that
these characters translate to "sulfur baths ".
PAGE TWO - DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES - OCTOBER 19, 1994
Ms. Matthies commented on the illegal replacement of the
change of face on the pole sign, and inquired about the
original sign colors. She commented on the fencing alteration
and suggested that the applicant be allowed to extend the
chain link with barbed wire and then slowly replace the
fencing with the same type of wrought iron that surrounds the
property on Main Street. Commented on the roofing material,
prefers the grayish green roofing material.
Mr. Bullard expressed deep concern over the illegal replace-
ment of the change of face on the pole sign. Asked if samples
of ethnic characters were included in the Design Review
Standards, if by law it is required if not the present
standards are to be adhered to. He inquired about the cost
for signage. Commented on the roofing material, prefers the
grayish green roofing material, and suggested the standard
roofing condition requiring use of the highest quality of
material be added.
Mr. Wilsey stated that the pole sign is the only freestanding
pole sign from that era on Main Street, and that the colors
also depict the era. He then commented on the alteration to
the chain link fencing and allowing the applicant to proceed
with barbed wire provided it can be softened with landscaping.
Mr. Metze expressed concern with the illegal replacement of
the change of face for the pole sign. He suggested the pole
be painted and inquired whether the standard colors apply to
this sign. He commented on the fencing alteration suggesting
the chain link with barbed wire be allowed on the exterior
property line along Pottery and Ellis, but not on the wrought
iron. Commented on the roofing material, prefers the grayish
green roofing material and suggested that the standard roofing
condition be applied. Asked that staff explain the desires of
the Committee to Mr. Lee so that he understands.
There was general discussion on the fencing alteration and
allowing the extension of barbed wire to the chain link for
security purposes, provided it can be softened with land-
scaping, such as trees, shrubs or bougainvillea, and the
applicant working with staff on the selection of landscape
material.
MOVED BY METZE, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND CARRIED BY A 5 -0 VOTE
TO:
1. APPROVE THE FREESTANDING POLE SIGN CHANGE OF FACE AS
SUBMITTED WITH THE POLE AND CABINET HOUSING TO BE PAINTED
WITH AN APPROVED COLOR FROM THE DESIGN STANDARDS AND
APPROVED BY STAFF.
2. APPROVE THE ALTERATION (EXTENSION) OF EXISTING CHAIN LINK
FENCING WITH 2 FEET OF BARBED WIRE, IN THE FORM OF THREE
LINEAR STANDS, FOR THE SIDE AND REAR PROPERTY (A 250 FOOT
LENGTH ALONG POTTERY AND A 280 FOOT LENGTH ALONG ELLIS)
WITH LANDSCAPING PROVIDED TO SOFTEN, AND THE APPLICANT TO
WORK WITH STAFF ON THE SELECTION OF PLANTING MATERIALS
AND SPACING.
3. APPROVE THE GRAYISH GREEN ROOFING MATERIAL COLOR FOR RE-
ROOFING. THE APPLICANT SHALL USE ROOFING MATERIALS WITH
A MINIMUM CLASS "A" FIRE RATING, RANDOM TAB -THREE
DIMENSIONAL PRESIDENTIAL SHAKE QUALITY.
4. APPROVE THE REPLACEMENT OF EXTERIOR WINDOWS AND DOORS.
PAGE THREE - DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES - OCTOBER 19, 1994
BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATIONS
1. 158 North Main Street - Oualitv'eollectibles - Dorothy Ross
Mr. De Gange explained this is a request to approve a business
license to operate an antique and collectible shop. An army
surplus store was previously located at this address. This
use is consistent with the C -1 and C -0 zoning district and
compatible with the existing uses within the vicinity.
Chairman Metze asked if the applicant was present and if there
were any concerns. Ms. Ross responded in the negative.
Mr. Wilsey inquired about signage. Mr. De Gange informed him
that the signage application would be coming before the DRC in
the future. Mr. Wilsey then inquired about streamlining the
sign process with concurrent processing.
Mr. Wilsey asked Ms. Ross if she had been informed by staff of
the merchandise that was prohibited for sale. Ms. Ross
responded in the affirmative stating that she would have
antiques and collectibles.
MOVED BY WILSEY, SECONDED BY NEFF AND CARRIED BY A 5 -0 VOTE TO
APPROVE THE BUSINESS LICENSE FOR QUALITY COLLECTIBLES AT 158
NORTH MAIN STREET WITH A CONDITION TO BE PLACED ON THE
BUSINESS LICENSE PROHIBITING THE ,SALE OF USED CLOTHING,
APPLIANCES OR "THRIFT- STORE" ITEM S' "ON THE PREMISES.
STAFF COMMENTS
City Planner Leslie stated that at the October 5th meeting the
possibility of a group tour was suggested. He reported that the
Brown Act allows for group tours and that posting of a notice is
all that is necessary.
Mr. Neff stated that he has compiled a list of projects in various
communities. He suggested that the tour also include a trip to his
office where the Commissioners /Committee members could view
detailed residential development aspects such as plotting,
elevations, floor plans, etc, from the developers standpoint.
A brief discussion ensued on the need to set a date and time for
the tour, possibly scheduling two tours one local and one for other
communities. It was the consensus of the Committee to schedule
November 5, 1994 for a local tour, and that City Council be
informed if this field trip.
COMMISSION /COMMITTEE COMMENTS
Commissioner /Committee Member Metze
1. Inquired about the square footage for the Tuscany Hills area.
City Planner Leslie explained that the Tuscany Hills Specific
Plan sets the minimum home size at 1,000 square feet.
2. Expressed concern with illegal erection of signage and the
position in which the DRC is then placed.
Commissioner /Committee Member Matthies
1. Commented on illegal installation /erection of signage. Asked
if there was a way to send notice on a yearly basis to persons
within the DRC District. Suggested notice with business
license renewal or a pamphlet.
PAGE FOUR - DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES - OCTOBER 19, 1994
2. Requested that staff check the mailing list for Tentative
Tract Map 27908 and ensure that a notice is sent to Mr.
Bayless.
Commissioner /Committee Member Neff
Nothing to report.
Commissioner /Committee Member Wilsey
Nothing to report.
Commissioner /Committee Member Bullard
Nothing to report.
MOVED BY METZE, SECONDED BY WILSEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF
THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AT
9:07 P.M.
Approved,
Daniel Metze
Chairman
Respectfullyesubmitted
Linda Grindstaff
Recording Secretary
MINUTES OF
LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
NOVEMBER 2, 1994
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 2, 1994, WAS CALLED FOR LACK OF AGENDA
ITEMS.
Respectfully ubmitted,
Linda Grindstaff
Recording Secretary
MINUTES
REGULAR DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 1994
********************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
The Design Review Committee Meeting was called to order at 10:00
p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COMMITTEE MEMBERS: NEFF, MATTHIES, WILSEY, BULLARD, AND
METZE
ABSENT: COMMITTEE MEMBERS: NONE
Also present were: City Planner Leslie, Associate Planner De
Gange.
MINUTE ACTION
Moved by Bullard, Seconded by Wilsey and carried by a unanimous
vote of those present to approve the Minutes of October 19, 1994,
with clarification on Page 2, "if by law it is required if not the
present standards are to be adhered to ", and to receive and file
Minutes of November 2, 1994.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There being no request to speak, Chairman Metze closed the PUBLIC
COMMENTS Section.
DESIGN APPLICATIONS
1. Fencing 169 North Main Street - John Williams
Mr. De Gange explained the applicant is requesting approval
for the installation of six -foot high wrought iron fencing
along a portion of the lot at 169 North Main Street and
another part of the lot that opens out to Bath Street. The
total length of fencing proposed is approximately 190 feet (60
feet along Main Street, 60 feet facing Bath Street and 70 feet
enclosing a rear portion of the building) . The design of the
proposed fencing along Main Street is to match the existing
fencing installed at the Cultural Center.
A brief discussion was held on the proposal meeting the Design
Standards and this being an improvement.
MOVED BY WILSEY, SECONDED BY BULLARD AND CARRIED BY A 5 -0 VOTE
TO APPROVE THE INSTALLATION OF WROUGHT IRON FENCING AT 169
NORTH MAIN STREET AS SUBMITTED.
BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATIONS
NONE
STAFF COMMENTS
Nothing to report.
COMMISSION /COMMITTEE COMMENTS
Commissioner /Committee Member Wilsey
Commented that the field trip conducted by the Planning Commission
on November 5th was enjoyable and educational. Staff's time and
work was appreciated and looking forward to scheduling another
field trip in the near future.
PAGE TWO - DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES - NOVEMBER 16, 1994
COMMISSION /COMMITTEE COMMENTS CONTINUED
Mr. Metze inquired about scheduling, at the next meeting, another
field trip, or if this should be after the Holidays. The consensus
was to conduct this field trip after the Holidays.
Commissioner /Committee Member Neff
Thanked staff for the time and work they put into the field trip,
conducted on November 5th.
Thanked John for his assistance on Shannon's proposal with regard
to the suggested condition on Page 4 of the Staff Report, and
commented on the coordination between the residents and the
developer to reach a compromise.
Commissioner /Committee Member Matthies
Commented that the field trip conducted by the Planning Commission
on November 5th was enjoyable and educational and thanked everyone
for their time and work.
Commented on the coordination between the residents and the
developer to reach a compromise and the accomplishments reached
this evening regarding Residential Project 94 -3.
Commissioner /Committee Member Metze
Commented that a lot was accomplished by the field trip conducted
on November 5th, and thanked Mr. Wilsey for the use of his
motorhome and staff for their work. Looking forward to the next
field trip.
Commissioner /Committee Member Bullard
Thanked Mr. Wilsey for the use of his motorhome and staff for their
work on the field trip conducted on November 5th.
ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY BULLARD, SECONDED BY WILSEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE
OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AT
10:10 P.M.
Approved,
Z� -7f /W
Daniel Metze
Chairman
Respectfully submitted
Linda Grindstaff
Recording Secretary
MINUTES OF
LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DECEMBER 7, 1994
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE LAKE ELSINORE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 7, 1994, WAS CALLED FOR LACK OF AGENDA
ITEMS.
Resp ctfully su muitted�
*L'nda�Grind taff
Recording Secretary
MINUTES
REGULAR DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 21, 1994
The Design Review Committee Meeting was called to order at 7:31
p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COMMITTEE MEMBERS: NEFF, MATTHIES, WILSEY, BULLARD, AND
METZE
ABSENT: COMMITTEE MEMBERS: NONE
Also present were: City Planner Leslie, Associate Planner De Gange
and Engineering Manager O'Donnell.
MINUTE ACTION
Moved by Bullard, Seconded by Wilsey and carried by a vote of 5 -0
to approve the Minutes of November 16, 1994, as submitted and to
receive and file the Minutes of December 7, 1994.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There being no request to speak, Chairman Metze closed the PUBLIC
COMMENTS Section.
DESIGN APPLICATIONS
1.
Mr. De Gange explained the applicant is requesting approval
for a secondary wall sign measuring 2' by 4' (eight square
feet) and is painted with forest green lettering and border on
a cream colored background, and a window sign that encompasses
approximately one square foot of area consisting of white
acrylic letters which have been adhered to the inside of the
window face. He explained that these signs were installed
prior to DRC approval due to the applicant's anxiousness to
have signage in place for the Christmas shopping season. He
stated these signs meet the Design Standards for the Historic
Elsinore Overlay District for signage with respect to size and
style of lettering and color.
Chairman Metze asked if the applicant was present.
Ms. Dorothy Ross, 525 East Franklin Street, stated she
submitted her application according to the paperwork provided,
which was outdated, and that the application could have been
earlier; then the next meeting, December 7th, was cancelled.
She explained that she wanted the signs up for the Winterfest
and that she intended to take them down, but did not.
Chairman Metze asked staff to ensure that the submittal
requirements are updated. Mr. De Gange responded that this
has been done.
Mr. Neff stated this is the second time an applicant has
installed a sign without approval and was concerned about
this. Suggested recommending to City Council modification of
an existing ordinance to deal with this situation.
Ms. Matthies commented on the installation of signage and then
asking for approval. The signs are nicely done and stays
within the guidelines; however, the concern is that we are
setting a precedence.
PAGE TWO - DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES - DECEMBER 21, 1994
Mr. Bullard stated he has the same concerns. Directed staff
that this will be the last one unless prior approval is
granted by the DRC. We have to let the applicants know in
advance that if they install signage without approval they
will be cited for an illegal sign.
Mr. Wilsey stated that he disagrees. He commented that Ms.
Ross tried to go by the rules and it was bureaucracy that kept
her from doing it. This is our problem and she should not be
cited for it. Recalls that when the business license came
before the DRC there was discussion about bringing signage in
concurrently. Mr. Wilsey stated that a solution to the
problem would be to streamline the application process and
include proposed signage with the original application.
Chairman Metze stated that he agrees with all comments;
however, we are restricted to the guidelines, also in a work
shop we received specific direction from City Council. In the
future will not approve a sign that has been installed prior
to its approval, and suggested that staff recommend to
applicants processing of their applications concurrently.
A brief discussion ensued on streamlining the process and type
of notification to businesses.
Ms. Matthies asked if there was a way to contact the property
owners and have them inform their tenants.
Mr. Wilsey suggested a fact sheet, in the form of a flyer,
answering typical questions be made available that could be
distributed to the Chamber of Commerce, property owners, etc,
and this be brought back to the DRC at the next meeting as an
informational item.
MOVED BY WILSEY, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND CARRIED BY A 5 -0
VOTE TO APPROVE THE SECONDARY WALL SIGN AND THE WINDOW SIGN AT
158 NORTH MAIN STREET.
BUSINESS_ LICENSE APPLICATIONS
NONE
Commissioner /Committee Member Wilsey
Commented on the following:
1. With regard to the 1,000 square foot rule, believes this came
from the County Standards. Asked if it would be prudent to
consider a 75% rule in the R -1 zone similar to the 75% rule
language that we have for lot square footage on dwelling
square footage.
City Planner Leslie suggested staff look at this and report
back.
2. The need to improve public relations skills and suggested
training programs for staff. Would like to see a fact sheet,
that outlines the application process and would include a
listing of contact people, prepared for our Community
Development Department.
City Planner Leslie stated the Assistant City Manager is
looking at scheduling a training seminar of this nature in
January.
Discussion ensued on the need to improve public relations, and
preparation of a fact sheet may assist in eliminating
problems.
PAGE THREE - DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES - DECEMBER 21, 1994
COMMISSION /COMMITTEE COMMENTS CONTINUED
Commissioner /Committee Member Neff
Commented on the following:
1. Training programs, Fred Pryer offers very good seminars. He
then commented on the cost, time and location for said
seminars.
2. Technical Plan Check issue, perhaps I could send over an extra
catalog from the National Association of Homebuilders. This
catalog contains practical down to earth literature on how
buildings go together, types /sizes of bolts used, windows and
etc. Does not know if the building inspectors have this
resource material available, but it might be a good
investment.
3. After the first of the year, would like to schedule a project
tour starting from my office in Newport Beach. Also, I can
show you the books in our library.
4. Agrees, that we need more responsive public relations.
5. Another fellow that spoke at the League of California Cities
Conference, Art Lustberg, mostly focused on appointed /elected
officials. He will be in Southern California again in January
or February; however, his seminars are expensive.
6. Informed the Commission that he may at the end of this month,
resign his position on the Planning Commission /DRC, as his
growing business requires more attention. Also, may not be
able to attend the January 4, 1995, meeting. Would like to
maintain an open door and communications.
Commissioner /Committee Member Matthies
Commented on the following:
1. Has enjoyed working with Commissioner Neff, and hopes that he
will stay and not resign.
2. Improving public relations, "kill them with kindness ". Every
citizen needs to feel important and that you are working for
them.
Commissioner /Committee Member Metze
Commented on the following:
1. Commissioner Neff's perspective is needed, and hopes that he
will stay and not resign.
2. Agrees with Commissioner Wilsey on the addition of a 75% rule
in the R -1 zone, and once a report is back on this start
something to change the Tuscany Hills Plan regarding the 1,000
square foot.
3. Agrees with Commissioner Wilsey, finds himself defending the
City often, but when you get into a situation where you have
no response you can not defend anyone. Sometimes I feel the
citizens are getting apathy from staff, and once a person has
a negative attitude they are going to buy every negative thing
that comes out in the paper. However, I have never met a
staff person that I didn't like.
4. Winterfest was a great success.
PAGE FOUR - DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES - DECEMBER 21, 1994
Commissioner /Committee Member Bullard
Commented on the following:
1. Asked that Commissioner Neff not resign.
2. Agrees with comments made on public relations. We need a
positive attitude.
3. Thanked staff for a good year and wished everyone a Happy
Holiday.
STAFF COMMENTS
Commented on the following:
1. The regular meeting scheduled for January 4, 1995, is being
called for lack of agenda items and due to the Holidays.
Commissioner Neff stated the Tuscany Hills Homeowners Association
is having a meeting on January 4th with Colrich Communities
(formerly National Home Builders) regarding the new model homes
they are proposing to build on the remaining vacant lots in the old
Woodcrest Development.
Mr. De Gange stated staff was just informed of this meeting today.
Commissioner Metze asked if someone from the City would be in
attendance. Mr. De Gange responded in the affirmative.
Mr. Leslie stated that planning staff would be in attendance and
possibly one Planning Commissioner. Asked that the Commission
discuss the selection.
Commissioner Metze asked that the time and date be confirmed, as he
would like to attend.
Commissioner Neff asked if more than one Planning Commissioner
could attend.
Discussion ensued on the Brown Act with regard to attending other
public meetings. Staff to check the Brown Act and /or with the City
Attorney for clarification on legislative bodies attending such
meetings and provide this information to the Commission.
ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY METZE, SECONDED BY WILSEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF
THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AT
8:25 P.M.
AA p
Daniel Metze
Chairman
Respectfully ubmitted
Linda �Gr dstaff
Recording Secretary