Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-06-1995 RDAMINUTES ' SPECIAL JOINT MEETING CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF LARE ELSINORE 130 NORTH MAIN STREET LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA FRIDAY~ JANUARY 6~ 1995 •*te****,k*t*,t**,ks*********,k,k,k,k******,k,k,kstt*tetete********te****ttter****• CALL TO ORDER The Special Joint Meeting of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order at 9:01 a.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by City Manager/Executive Director Molendyk. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMSERS/BOARDMEMSERS: ALONGI~ BENDER~ BRINLEY~ PAPE~ WASHBURN ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS/BOARDMEMBERB: NONE Also present were: City Manager/Executive Director Molendyk, Assistant City Manager/Assistant Executive Director Rogers, City Attorney/Legal Counsel Aarper, Manager of Special Projects Watenpaugh, Community Services Director Sapp, Interim Chief Building Official Russell and City Clerk/Clerk of the Board Kasad. BIISINESS ITEM 1. Lake Elsinore Diamond - Grand Jurv Letter & City Response. (F:134.10) City Manager/Executive Director Molendyk explained that a letter had been received from the Grand Jury with comments regarding the Stadium project; and Council and the Staff did not feel those comments were accurate, and noted that what is presented today is the proposed response prepared by the City Attorney. City Attorney/Legal Counsel Harper read each finding of the Grand Jury and the appropriate response from the "Response to Interim Report of the Riverside County Grand Jury (Lake Elsinore Stadium Project". Councilman/Chairman Pape noted that the word "excepted" on page two of the response should be "accepted". He stressed that the Stadium project had been done right from the beginning and is a first class facility. Councilman/Chairman Pape commented on finding #6 and questioned whether all impacted agencies had been satisfied with regard to the EIR. City Attorney Harper indicated that they had been satisfied. Councilwoman/Boardmember Brinley requested clarification as to whether the project could have proceeded without the approval of those agencies. City Attorney Harper indicated that literally the project could not proceed without those approvals. With regard to finding #8 Mr. Pape inquired what the donated acreage was from the Lehr Family. It was indicated that it was approximately 26 acres. PAGS TiPO - SPECIAL JOINT MEETING - JANUARY 6~ 1995 Councilman/Chairman Pape commented that with regard to finding #9, there couldn!t be a better arrangement made than to receive free dirt for the project. He also commented on finding #10 noting that there were water trucks and street sweepers addressing the dirt and debris on an ongoing basis. _~, Councilman/Chairman Pape questioned the $4 million in off-site improvements and whether they could be factored into future developments. City Attorney Harper concurred that some of those costs can be offset by future development. Mr. Pape stressed that the accurate figure which should be used for accuracy was $19.1 million. Mayor/Boardmember Washburn requested and received clarification that change orders are generally for changes which occur in the field. Councilmembers/Boardmembers Pape and Brinley questioned the $8 to $10 million in change orders and where those numbers came from. City Attorney/Leqal Counsel Harper indicated that he was not certain where those numbers came from and detailed the sub-committee format under which the Grand Jury operates. Mr. Pape inquired how many people serve on the Grand Jury. Mr. Harper indicated that each subcommittee is approximately five or six people. Mr. Pape questioned how much expense was incurred by the City to prepare the documents requested by the Grand Jury. Mr. Harper indicated that he was not certain; and noted that he was also not certain who had testified before the committee, as he had not. Mayor/Boardmember Washburn addressed finding #18 and clarified that the $450,000 spent for equipment did increase the City share of the profit. He further noted that with regard to Conclusion Item #1, Riverside is currently pursuing a joint effort with Moreno Valley; and Temecula would have liked to have the team there, but political changes did not allow for it. Councilman/Chairman Pape suggested that on page 14 rather than using "substandard" to address the Adelanto Stadium, the statement be "below minor league standards". He inquired who reviews the work of the Grand Jury. Mr. Harper indicated that their work goes to the Deputy District Attorney to review for legal accuracy, but it is basically an internal process. Mr. Pape expressed concern with the amount of inaccuracies in their findings. Councilwoman/Boardmember Brinley commented on this matter being turned over to the Grand Jury and noted that indictments should have been issued if they suspected counterfeit documents. City Attorney/Legal Counsel Harper concurred that if they had found something in that vein he would like to address it. Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairman Bender suqgested that thi~ report is an open ended opportunity for a witch hunt. Mr. Harper concurred that while he was not certain what to expect from the Grand Jury, he was surprised at the level of factual inaccuracies. Mr. Pape expressed concern with the sloppy investigation job done by the Grand Jury. Mr. Washburn noted his concern for the headlines and the cloud it produces, while the correction and accurate information will receive very little press. Mr. Aarper commented on a recent Letter to the Editor by Chris Hyland and concurred that the response may be of little value in that she has already been informed that the case is closed. PAGE THREE,- SPECIAL JOINT MEETING - JANUARY 6~ 1995 Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairman Bender questioned how the Grand Jury members are chosen. City Attorney/Legal Counsei Harper indicated that they are appointed by the Board of Supervisors and generally consist of retired people who have the time to participate. Mr. Bender inquired whether there are specific qualifications or background requirements. Mr. Harper indicated that there are none, and the members are flooded with so much information in a short time that there is no time for in depth review. Councilwoman/Boardmember Brinley inquired whether they have staff or attorneys present for their investigations. Mr. Harper indicated that there is no staff, and attorneys are only present when witnesses are being interviewed. Mayor/Boardmember Washburn commented that this is a shadow created by criticism from the "watchdog" group. City Manager/Executive Director Molendyk inquired whether Mr. Harper was recommending an audit as suggested by the Grand Jury Mr. Harper indicated that he was not recommending the audit because the City already employs an independent auditor to prepare annual audits. Councilman/Boardmember Alongi inquired whether those who testified could now talk about their interviews since the case is closed. City Attorney Harper indicated that his understanding was that those who testified where never allowed to discuss their interviews. Mr. Alongi expressed surprise with the Grand Jury~s report; notinq that it was evident that they did not read the agreement with the baseball team. He indicated that he was confident that the City Attorney would keep the Council out of trouble, but noted that there were several comments in the response to which he could take issue. He commented that from the beginning the restaurant was to be a first class restaurant open every day of the week. He indicated that there was no discussion of being a catering kitchen or a banquet hall. City Attorney Harper concurred with those statements and not that everyone felt it would be open for lunch. He advised that this issue is currently being pursued with the team and Volume Services. He clarified that discussion of what was built is appropriate, however the service level is not pertinent to this discussion. Councilman/Boardmember Alongi expressed concern with the voting record presented by the City Attorney in the response and suggested a review of the minutes. City Attorney Harper clarified the votes as presented. Mr. Alonqi clarified that he was never dissatisfied with the facility or its quality and stressed that his concern was always the financing mechanisms. He also stressed that the final total cost for the Stadium should include the costs of refinancing. He commented that the City is now in a financial dilemma because of the project. Ae reiterated his belief that it is a great facility for the Community, but he is still concernED with the manner in which it was financed. He indicated that which team came here was not important, but noted that the negotiations were done by two people. Councilman/Boardmember Alongi indicated that he feels the audit should take place and include all related financing costs. City Attorney Harper clarified that the only bonding directly related to the Stadium is the $10 million in Sumitomo Bonds, and the balance was for pre-existing issuances. He concurred with this information, but stressed that he did not PAGE FOtTR - SPECIAL JOINT MEETING - JANQARY 6~ 1995 believe the Council should gamble with the public funds. He noted the impact of Orange County finances on this community and its ability to receive a bond rating and questioned the ultimate impact it will have on the interest rate. City Attorney Harper stressed that Standard & Poors did not down rate the City's bond rating, but they will not rate any bonds in this area for a period of time. He further explained that the period of time will be too long to wait for the upcoming requirements. He also noted that the Grand Jury report did not help the situation. Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chairman Bender commented that it is important to recognize that while the Stadium possibly could have been done for less, the project is now complete and the costs have been absorbed and the Council needs to deal with the facility. He further commented that the Council has a responsibility to work together to capture the most benefit possible from the facility. He indicated that the focus of this meeting should be the findings of the Grand Jury and the City's response to those findings. Edith Stafford, 54 Elm Street, inquired whether the Grand Jury was invited to this meeting and expressed concern that the Council ripped the report apart without their presence. She noted the finding that there was a possibility of counterfeit documents and stressed that they must have found something to suggest that. City Attorney Harper indicated that if that was the case he would like to know about it to pursue it legally. He also clarified that the Grand Jury members never appear as a body in public. Mrs. Stafford reiterated her belief that they should have been invited and in not doing so made this meeting appear dirty and underhanded. She stressed the need for an audit. Mr. Harper reiterated the pre existing obligation to he State for audits, which has already been met. Councilman/Boardmember Alongi stressed that the Grand Jury suggested an audit and indicated that the audit should specifically address the Stadium. Mrs. Stafford reiterated the need for an audit and indicated that there is the appearance that something is wrong and if the City does not have the audit done she will approach the State to do it. Ace Vallejos, 15231 Cobre, advised that he owns a house in the City and pays taxes in the City even though he lives in the County area. He expressed concern with the finances of the City and what goes on in the Community. He indicated that he wants to see a proper accounting for the Stadium and suggested the possibility of "white collar crime". Chris Hyland, 15191 Wavecrest Drive, questioned why this meeting is being held at 9 a.m. for such an important issue. She questioned the actual appraised value of the Stadium and what collateral is held against the Stadium. She commented that the District Attorney is not effective and this inquiry will not end with the Grand Jury or the District Attorney. She expressed concern that Councilman Pape was suggesting that people address getting rid of the Grand Jury. She requested a forensic audit of the entire project. She commented that she is not against the Stadium, but questioned what has been happening with the team. Mayor Washburn commented on the benefits of projects such as the Outlet Center and the Stadium and noted positive comments PAGE FIVE - SPECIAL JOINT MEETING - JANUARY 6~ 1995 and excitement voiced by the community. Ae indicated that the response as presented is accurate and thanked City Attorney Harper for his work on it. He stressed that most of the votes on the Stadium were not 3 to 2 and indicated that he was proud to participate and proud of the facility and team. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY PAPE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE RESPONSE AS CORRECTED AND AUTHORIZE TRANSMITTAL TO THE GRAND JURY. ADJOIIRNMENT MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BENDER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADJOURN THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEFa,TING AT 10:25 A.M. . ~ ~' ~' ~ ~ -~- ARY WASHB ~ MAYOR KEVIN W. P E~ CHAIRMAN CITY~ LAKE ELSINORE REDE~IELOPMENT AGENCY AT EST: CKI KAS D, CIT CLERK/ CLERK OF THE BOARD MINQTES REGIILAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LARE ELSINORS 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA TUESDAY~ JANOARY 10~ 1995 ***,t**,t,t***,t********,t**,t******,t,t********,t*******,t,t,t****,t*,k,k*****,t CALL TO ORDER ~ The Regular Redevelopment Aqency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 8:45 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: ALONGI, BENDER, BRINLEY, WASHBURN, PAPE ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Assistant Executive Director Rogers, Administrative Services Director Boone, City Planner Leslie, Community Services Director Sapp, Public Services Director Tecca, Chief Building Official Russell, Manager of Special Projects Watenpaugh, City Treasurer Kelley and City Clerk Kasad. PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS Items Requested: No. 5 CONSENT CALENDAR ~ MOVED BY WASHBIIRN~ SECONDED BY BENDER AND CARRIED BY LiNANIMOUB VOTE ' TO APPROVE TSE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: a. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - December 13, 1994. a. Special Joint Redevelopment Agency/City Council Meeting - December 21, 1994. c. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - December 27, 1994. 2. Received and filed the Investment Report for November 30, 1994. 3. Ratified Warrant Lists of December 15, 1994, and December 22, 1994. 4. Approved agreement for the Inland Empire Marketing Program. BIISINE88 ITEM 5. Stadium Audit. Boardmember Alongi explained that he had asked that this item be presented because there have been a lot of figures presented in regard to the cost of the ballfield. He stated that he felt that the public was entitled to know the exact cost of the facility. He asked that the Redevelopment Agency Board approve a forensic audit to ascertain the exact cost. PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINOTES - January 10, 1995 Gary Kelley, 224 Ohio Street asked to address the Board as a resident of the City and not as the City Treasurer. He stated that when he moved to Lake Elsinore ten years ago there was one stop light and no tax base. He noted an article from Rancho News regarding their city election in Temecula and it pointed to Lake Elsinore as an example of a City who had developed a tax base in sales tax revenueo Mre Kelley explained that to do an audit on the Stadium would add another layer of expenditure of funds to the existing cost. Chairman Pape asked that the procedure used for payment on the bills and the procedure for the annual audit be explained. Administrative Services Director Boone e~tplained that the law requires that the City have an outside entity do an audit of the City's accounting records as well as the Redevelopment Agency records and the annual audit has just been completed. He further explained that there is a test of all the records that had to do with the construction of the stadium. He noted that the auditors review the agenda items, the minutes, recommendations, checks written, the financing that was done and then they draw their conclusion. Administrative Services Director Boone explained that this is not done with every record, but was tested to a point that the auditors gave a clean opinion of our financial records for the Redevelopment Aqency. He stated that at this point he does not see where the City would qain anything by having another audit of the financial accounting of the records of the Stadium itself. He explained that he produced a report to the Grand Jury that estimated the cost of the Stadium, the infrastructure and all the surroundinq costs related to the project which was approximately $22,000,000. He stated that all the costs are not in yet and as soon as they are, he will be glad to give a full accounting of where the money went and this can be accomplished in approximately 30 days. Boardmember Alongi stated that a general audit did not examine if there was a duplicate voucher or if there was an overcharge and did not ascertain if the materials used were fairly priced which is what a forensic audit would do. He asked if the $22,000,000 includes the cost of financing. Administrative Services Director Boone stated that it does not. Boardmember Alonqi asked if it includes the cost of the team. Administrative Services Director Boone stated that it did not. Boardmember Alongi stated that the Stadium is in excess of $24,000,000 when all the costs are totaled up and that places the 25,000 people in the City of Lake Elsinore in debt to the City in the amount of $24,000 per person. He asked if the City has pledged our gas tax toward the debt. Administrative Services Director Boone stated that with the last financing the City pledged their motor vehicle fees toward the debt. Councilman Alongi stated that by pledging those funds, it makes the tax payer responsible for the debt. Administrative Services Director Boone explained that the Redevelopment Agency is responsible for paying the debt, the City pledged the motor vehicle fees to secure the bonding. Boardmember Washburn stated that there are approximately 12 people who consistently try to tear down the community and all that the positive members of the community have tried to do. He stated that he feels that the project stands for itself and that he does not agree with another audit. Boardmember Bender stated that the cost will not be altered by having another audit, except to increase the overall cost. He explained that it is time to go forward and utilize the PAGE THREE - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINOTES - JaAUBLy 10~ 1995 facility to it potential. He noted that the cost of the Stadium will continue to raise with all the services that will be required to answer all the questions and provide research. Boardmember Bender stated that he does not approve of another audit when the available resources should be used to answer problems at hand. Boardmember Brinley explained that it is time to move on and deal with the positive and the Board/Council should work as a team. She noted that when majority rules, then it is important to support that effort, even if you did not agree in the vote. She stated that she is opposed to another audit. Chairman Pape stated that their is not much that can be changed to what has already occurred, but what can be done is to make the stadium a success. Edith Stafford, 54 Elm Street, stated that she feels that the reason that the Boardmembers do not want an audit is because they are trying to hide something. She spoke in favor of an audit. Chris Hyland, 15191 Wavecrest Drive, stated that she was the one who went to the Grand Jury and she stated that there will be an audit if she has to go all the way to God. She stated that the money should have been spent on the street and not the Stadium. MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BRINLEY AND CARRIED BY A 4 TO 1 VOTE WITH ALONGI CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE ITEM. THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING AAS ADJOIIRNED AT 9:05 P.M. A EST: VICKI KASAD~ CLERK OF THE BOARD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINtTTEB SPECIAL JOINT MEETING CITY COIINCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF LAR& ELSINORE STATE CAPITOL~ ROOM 4158 SACRAMENTO~ CALIFORNIA NEDNESDAY~ JANIIARY 18~ 1995 •***t***********ft,k******a******re,k****,k,k*,k*******rr*fe*******s*****• (F:44.1)(8:92.1) A Special Joint Meeting of the Lake Elsinore City Council/ Redevelopment Agency was convened in the Office of Assemblyman Bruce Thompson, State Capitol Room 4158, at 9:30 a.m. Councilmembers Alongi, Bender, Brinley, Pape and Washburn were in attendance. After introductions, legislative matters relating to the Lake, Lake Master Plan and future funding and improvements were discussed. T meeting was adjourned at approximately 9: 5~ a.m. ~~'/~ /%~- r~ GAR . NAG~IIRN~ MAYOR R VIN W. P , CHAIRMAN CIT F LARE ELSINORE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINIITES REGOLAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEBTING CITY OF LARE ELSINORS 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LARE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TIIESDAY~ JANQARY 24~ 1995 •**a*******,t#**tk*********tetetettte*tetetetetetetefe*********ieft*****afrfrs*****• CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment ASency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 7:4G p.~. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERB: ALONGI~ BENDER~ BRIA`I,EY~ 2~APE~ WASHBIIRN ABSENTS BOARDMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: Executive Director Molendy~; Assistant Executive Director Rogers, Legal Counsel Harper, Admir.i:;~rative Services Director Boone, City Planner Leslie, Chief Building Official Russell, Community Services Director Sapp, Public Services Director Tecca, Manager of Special Projects Watenpaugh, City Treasurer Kelley and Clerk of the Board Kasad. PIIBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDI2ED ITEMS None Requested. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY WASHBIIRN~ SECONDED BY ALONGI AND CARRIED BY IINANIMOIIS VOTB TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: (F:134.3) a. Special Joint Redevelopment Agency/City Council Meeting - January 6, 1995. b. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - January 10, 1995. 2. Ratified Warrant List for January 13, 1995. (F:12.3) PIIBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ZTEMS None. ESECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS None. None. PAGS TWO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MIN[TTES - JANIIARY 24~ 1995 CLOSED SESSION Noneo ADJOIIRNMENT THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING A TEST9 c~k .~-~L. ICRI RASAD;, (;LERR THE BOARD REDEVELOPL~IF.'.FTa' AGENCY ~ // J ~~ W. P; AT 7:47 Y.M. ~ CHAIRMAN AGENCY MINOTES REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LAR& ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LARS ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA TIIESDAY~ FEBRQARY 14~ 1995 •*s~****a*************s****************~**********r*******r******** CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 11:51 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COi1NCILMEMBERB: ALONGI~ BENDER~ BRINLEY, PAPE~ WASHBIIRN ABSENT: CODNCILMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Assistant Executive Director Rogers, Legal Counsel Harper, City Planner Leslie, Chief Building Official Russell, Community Services Director Sapp, Public Services Director Tecca, Manager of Special Projects Watenpaugh, and Clerk of the Board Kasad. POBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS None requested. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY WASHBIIRN~ SECONDED BY BENDER AND CARRIED BY IINANIMOIIS VOTB TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: (F:134.3) a. Special Joint Redevelopment Agency/City Council Meeting with Senator Haynes - January 18, 1995. b. Special Joint Redevelopment Agency/City Council Meeting with Assemblyman Thompson - January 18, 1995. c. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - January 24, 1995. 2. Received and ordered filed the Investment Report for December 31, 1994. (F:12.5) 3. Ratified Warrant List for January 31, 1995. (F:12.3) BUSINESS ITEM 4. Housina Assistance Program - Osborne Development Corporation - Resolution No. RDA 95-1. (F:87.1) City Manager Molendyk noted this proposal and ~.r.ciicaY.Ad that ' within the Lago del Oro tract there are appro:ci~ea~ely 30 homes I left to which these dollars would relate. Iie alsa noted tl~at similar programs have been used in the Cities of Highland a^3 Colton. Special Projects Coordinator Wood stressed ~~Yrat this proposal is at no cost to the City/Agency. He itxlicated that an administrative fee would be applied for eacn applic~tion process. PAGE TWp - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - FEBROARY 14~ 1995 i , ~' ~ ~ Wood~indi at d t estioned the number of homes involved. Mr. hat there are 30 homes at $5,000 each for the total of $150,000. Chairman Eape noted the $50,000 increments to the City and inquired what will happen with any residual funds. Mr. Wood indicated that these funds are an outright contribution to the Agency. Vice Chairman Bender questioned what happens if there is $50,000 provided and only $40,000 utilized. Mr. Wood indicated that the balance will be returned to the developer. Vice Chairman Bender questioned page 5 of 37, Section 4 of the Resolution, which read $100,000 and inquired whether this should in fact be $150,000. Mr. Wood concurred that this should be corrected to $150,000. MOVED BY BENDERs SECONDED BY BRINLEY AND CARRIED BY A VOTS OF 4 TO ~ WSTH ALONGE EASSING TO APPROVE THE PLAld AND ADOPT RESOLOTION NO. RDA 95-5. RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-1 RESOLIITION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF LARE ELSINORE APPROVING A CERTAIN OANER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT SY AND ~ETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF LARB ELSINORE AND OSBORNE DE9ELOPMENT CORPORATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH A CERTAIN MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. PUSL%C COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS None. ERECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS Noneo BOARAMEMBER COMMENTS None. CLOSED SESSION None. THS REGIILAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WAS P.AY. Y+ J,STe ~( jNOl~00~1= ~ICB% ECASAP~ CL=3RR OF THE BOARD ItEDFV1~LGYMF.c;i° :sGENCY AT 11:55 ' ~t7Cf~ ~ REVIN W. APE~ CHAIRMAN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINQTES REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LARE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LARE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TOESDAY, FEBROARY 28~ 1995 *******ttra******ra***************************rrr****+t**tt******s~ CALL TO ORDER The Reqular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 8:05 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: SOARDMEMSERS: ALONGI~ BENDER~ BRINLEY~ WA3ABURN~ PAPE ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERSs NONE Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Assistant Executive Director Rogers, Legal Counsel Harper, City Planner Leslie, Chief Building Official Russell, Public Services Director Tecca, Manager of Special Projects Watenpaugh, City Treasurer Kelley and Clerk of the Board Kasad. PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS None requested. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items were pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion and consideration: Item Nos. 3 and 4. MOVED BY BRINLE9 ^~G"',9'~"''[: BY WASHBORN AND CARRIED SY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE TF'it;.`iALANCE OF THE CON3ENT CALENDAR A3 PRESENTEDa 1. The following Minutes were approved: (F:134.3) a. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - February 14, 1995. 2. Ratified Warrant List for February 15, 1995. (F:12.3) ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR 3. Lakeshore Drive Bridae Replacement - Resolution No. RDA 95-2 - Agreement with Caltrans. (F:156.2) 4. Award of Contract - Lakeshore Drive Bridae Replacement Pro~ect - Pro Contracting Corporation. Executive Director Molendyk commented on this project and advised that this is the bridge over the San Jacinto River on Lakeshore Drive and noted that is has been given a priority by the Council for quite some time. He further noted that with the earthquakes, etc. in California, the funds had been shifted, however funding has now been approved. He questioned the anticipated project timing and the reimbursments. PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINIITES - FEBRUARY 28~ 1995 Public Services Director Tecca commented that, the City has been working toward this project'for 16 years. He advised that the permits are now in order, the environmental documents are complete and the plans are ready. He noted that representatives of Pro Contracting were in attendance and introduced them. Chairman Pape inquired how the long the bridge will be closed. Dave Smith, Project Superintendent indicated that the schedules are presently being reviewed and advised that sufficient notice will be provided for the closure and they will strive to make the closure as short as possible. Mr. Tecca indicated that the pre-construction meeting will be held on March 15 and at that time a schedule will be presented. Mr. Pape indicated that he felt it would be helpful to know the timing, so people can plan accordinglye Boardmember Alongi questioned the alternate routes and whether there was still to be one across private property. Mr. Tecca indicated that there were originally two plans, one ran in to environmental concerns and the offer across private property was withdrawn. - Executive Director Molendyk requested an explanation of non- participating costs related to the project. Mr. Tecca explained that Caltrans evaluates costs and factors appropriate to the projects and decides what is absolutely necessary and will not participate on item which are not necessary, in their evaluation. die advised that they have andicated that they will not participate in Y.he $20,000 for a ~ Storm Water Clarifier and $36,135 for a block wall around the sewer lift station, pavement for the lift station and the gate at the lift station, all required by E.V.M.W.D. Vice Chairman Bender questioned the time frame for completion of the project. Mr. Tecca indicated that the contract is for 180 working days and it is anticipated to be open for the 1995 Christmas Season. Boardmember Alongi requested clarification of the improvements to the lift station, particularly whether it was still proposed to accommodate a truck turning around. Mr. Tecca indicated that it will be done so a truck can drive in, go around the lift station and out. MOVED B7C WASHBURNa SECONDED BY BRINLE7[ AND CARRYEH BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-2 ADOPTING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 001 TO THE LOCAL AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT EOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-5074; IN3TRUCT THE RDR CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE SUPPLEMENT AND ENSTRUCT THE CIT% CLERR TO RETURN IT TO CALTRANS FOR EXECUTYON; AND AWARD THE CONTRACT TO PRO CONTRACTING CORPORATION FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE E,ARES$ORE DRIVE BRIDGE OVER THE SAN JACINTO RIVER CHANNEL~ IN °PHE AMOUNT OF $2e290~415.75e RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-2 A RESOLIITION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIAs ADOPTING PROGRAM SOPPLEMENT NO. 001 TO I,OCAL AGENCI'-STATE AGREEMENT FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08~ 5074 LAISESKORE DRYVE BRIDGEo PAGE THREE - REDEVELOPMENT PiGENCY MINOTES - FEBRIIARY 28~ 1995 BII3INESS ITEMS None. ' PUBLIC COMMENT3 - NON-AGENDIZED ITEM3 None. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS None. BOARDMEMBER COMMENT3 Deferred to City Council Meeting. CLOSED SESSION None. THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING ~:~ ADJSY(TIfNED AT 8:20 P.M. G~ W. PAPE, CHAIRMAN ILOPMENT AGENCY F'l 5S'^ C .~P.~"~1~~ VICRi RASAD, CLE?2R OF THE BOARD :2EDEVELOPMENT AC.ENCY MINiJTES REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LARE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA TIIESDAY~ MARCH 14~ 1995 *,k*******,k****,k*,k*******************,k,k,kAA~*******tta*,t***r**+t****,k CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment _*:,.ra.::~~ Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 8:15 p.n. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: ALONGI~ BENDER~ BRINLEY~ WASHBURN~ PAPE ABSENTS BOARDMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: City Manager Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Rogers, Legal Counsel Harper, City Planner Leslie, Community Services Director Sapp, Public Services Director Tecca, Manager of Special Projects Watenpaugh, City Treasurer Kelley and Clerk of the Board Kasad. PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS Requests were received to address Item No. 4 and deferred to that discussion. MOVED BY BENDER~ SECONDED BY BRINLEY AND CARRIED BY IINANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE CON3ENT CALENDAR A3 PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: (F:134.3) a. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - February 28, 1995. 2. Received and ordered filed the Investment Report for January, 1995. (F:12.5) 3. Ratified Warrant List for February 28, 1995. (F:12.3) BUSINESS ITEM 4. Renart on Lakeshore Drive Bridge Proiect. (F:156.2) Executive Director Molendyk stated that Councilman Alongi had requested a verbal report regarding the detour for the Lakeshore Drive Bridge Project. He explained that when the City originally looked at a detour, a route across the riverbed was considered, but the City was advised by Cal-Trans that U.S. Fish and Wildlife would not allow the City to utilize that area. He further explained that another possible detour was considered which would cross property owned by Mr. Robert Williams. He noted th~.t the City had received approval from the owner to use the pr~perty in March of 1992, however in March of 1993, that approval was withdrawn. The property owner stated that he would allow the City the use of the property as a trade off for improvements to the channel between Lakeshore and Casino; which was estimated to cost approximately $1,000,000. Executive Director Molendyk PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MZNQTES - MARCH 14e 1995 explained that staff had estimated that it would cost $120,000 to place a temporary roadway and the funds would have been provided as part of the bridge grant from the State of California. He further explained since the,City no longer had approval to use Mr. Williams proper~y for the detour right-of- way the money was removed from the Grant and' now is not available. He noted that Councilman Alongi had some concerns regarding how the detour might affect the businesses in the City and the community as a whole. Boardmember Washburn asked that the last page of the fiscal impact be read. Executive Director Molendyk explained that the original detour roadway would have been 80~ funded by Federal dollars, however since ~he detour roadway was removed from the project and the project has already received funding authorization, Cal-Trans has informed the City that it cannot be reinserted for funding unless the City wants to delay the project for another year and risk losing all of the funding. Therefore, the Agency would need to entirely fund the temporary roadway in the amount of $120,000. Chairman Pape then asked the person who requested to speak on the item ~o come forward. Mike Rooney, Owner of Canyon Battery, stated that he will be impacted by the road closure and it will probably put him out of business. Ae explained that he is hoping that the City will come to some fype of agreement with either Robert Williams or another property owner nearby which would allow for a good flow of traffic. Mr. Rooney stated that he has been in business since 1982 and is one of six or seven business owners present this evening who will be affected by the closure of the Bridqe. He stressed that the closure is anticipated to be nine to twelve months and should it take that long the affected businesses will not be able to survive. He asked that Council assist with their problem and offered that the affected businesses will be glad to work with the City to resolve their problems and facilitate another detour route so that they don't loose their businesses. Lloyd Bridges, 30480 Murrieta Road, Menifee, congratulated the City on the Stadium and stated that it took the City six months to complete the Stadium, he compared that time frame to the 200' bridge the City is going to build and noted that it is projected to take a year to build and will cost him approximately $24,000 in business because of the closure. He noted that the City has had eight years to prepare for this project and questioned if staff had pursed other options for detours. He questioned Fish and Wildlife and stated that he doubted that there were any fish in that channel and suggested that the project should be delayed for a few more years until the wa~er goes down to allow use the creek. Ae asked for the cooperation of Council to reconsider building the bridge at this time since the recent rain has caused flooding and it would take a year or more to build the bridge in those conditions and would destroy all the small businesses in that area. Boardmember Bender stated that he sees an item on the Agenda regarding the Lakeshore Drive Bridge Project, and asked if the Board is being asked to approve a new detour and/or suggest alternatives. Boardmember Alongi confirmed that this was his intent. Boardmember, Bender asked why there were no alternatives in the report for the Board to consider. Chairman Pape expressed confusion with this item. PAGE THREE - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINOTES - MARCH 14~ 1995 Boardmember Alongi stated that he had the item placed on the Agenda because last week he was informed that the detour was different than what he originally thought. He explained that he knew that the City had an agreement with Mr. Williams for a detour and did not know that, it had been withdrawn. Boardmember Alongi stated that he 'did not feel that it was right for the residents and businesses in the City to be held hostage because the property owner and the City had a legal dispute. He noted that the detour now planned will route traffic through a residential area and right past an elementary school which will be impacted by parked cars and school buses at 2:30 p.m. He explained that Franklin Street could be used, but he felt that the roadway was not very safe and the other alternative would be the freeway. He indicated he called Mr. Williams to ask him if something could be worked out to help resolve the detour problem. Boardmember Alongi stated that he has called the City Attorney and eacplained that Mr. Williams is aware that the City has financial problems with its budget and that the City has a formula to use to figure out the charges for the use of the property and that is 12~ of the appraised value multiplied by the square footage of property used, divided by 12 and that is the cost for the use. He further explained that Mr. Williams told him that he would not expect the City to pay that fee in cash, but would ask for a credit on the City's books toward his permit fees, when and if he develops the property. Boardmember Alongi stated that if the Board weighs that against what it will cost this community for the detour and the potential loss of businesses in that area, it is a small price to pay. He further stated that Mr. Williams also said that it depends on what the appraised value of the land is, as to what it costs and if it is lower or higher than what the City originally offered, then that is what the fee will be. He stated that the Council and Board needs to be kept abreast of what is occurring and had he known that there was a problem with the detour he would have talked i:a Mr. Williams and helped to resolve the problems long before the forms were sent back to the Federal Government. He noted that Mr. Williams has been a community spirited person and :ias raised his children here and he is not a person who causes problems. He cited the problems that the previous Council had with the Water District regarding Mission Trail and pointed out that a middle qround was found and the project was completed. He noted that the same thing applies in this case. He explained that no one is asking that the City set aside the Lawsuit, but explained that no one should hold the City hostage. Boardmember Alongi stated that the City seems to find the dollars when they are for something else and the $120,000 for the detour road can be allocated from the 1995/96 budget from the road tax for the roads for part of it and the remainder can come from the 1996/97 budget. He noted that there are ways of finding the dollars, and explained that this is a very important issue for the community. Boardmember Alongi pointed out that extra gas will be burned because longer trips will be taken, and the public safety of the residential area is threatened and the traffic on Main Street will be increased. He suggested that the Board set a study session to allow time for discussion of other possible solutions for financing with the Finance Director as well as discussion with Engineering regarding the possibility of reducing the design of the roadway to cut costs. He explained that the Board needs to show the public that they are interested in them and that it wasn't something that went over our heads. PAGE FOUR - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINtTTEB - MARCH 14, 1995 Public Services Director Tecca stated that the detour road was nearly designed when it was excluded from the'project. He presented an exhibit showing both the design of the detour road that was to run across the"channel and the one that was to run through Mr. Williams property. He e~lained that the roadway was designed to be a narrow, lightly built roadway with three inches over native soil with no base and it would be 1,100 feet long and 28 feet wide. He noted that much of the expense comes into play from the grading of the road. Public Services Director Tecca explained that on one half of the property there is a considerable cut and the other half a considerable fill with several culverts underneath the roadway for drainage. He noted that the construction of the roadway is approximately $82,000 and the removal of the roadway and putting the property back into shape after the project is complete is approximately $15,000. The remainder of the money would go to the final design, construction, inspections and the 10~ contingency in case of problems for a maximum of $120,000. Chairman Pape requested clarification that in March, 1992, the City received a letter from Mr. Williams offering a right-of- way for a detour road and the detour road was included in the project and the design was nearly completed. He further requested clarification that this would be a minimal type road ~hat is not too fancy. Public Services Director Tecca confirmed both items. Chairman Pape noted that in March, 1993, a meeting was held between the City and Mr. Williams and he offered to give the City the required land for the bridge widening to allow us to use the detour roadway, in exchange for building the San Jacinto River Channel across his property which would have cost the City approximately $1,000,OOOe Public Services Director Tecca clarified that it would cost at least $1,000,000. -He explained that the City spent $1,500,000 for our portion which'is already complete. Chairman Pape continued that Mr. Williams then rescinded his initial offer in exchange for work on the channel and in response to that there were 17 items including the compensation for the detour rcirauway, ne asxea i= Lne $120,00o construction cos how much the rental fee r Tecca stated that it wou amount decided by the cc would be if the City wo~ stated that it is not tha the City had the property the property owner, the pY offer and would prefer 1 therefore the suit only r~ Chairman Pape clarified t] then the City would pay w and Mr. Williams is aski Public Services Directox Boardmember Alongi stated additional money. Chairm in regard to this issue with when it went to Ca finalized; is it will have of $120,000 plus the rent been done in a timely man. the majority of the' cost confirmed that the State ocner items would be added on to the :s to include a rental fee.' He asked rould be. Public Services Director ld be 12~ of the final agreed upon urt. Chairman Pape asked what it i. Public Services Director Tecca t type of case. He explained that appraised and an offer was made to operty owner declined to accept that :o have the court set the amount, :lates to the value of the propertye iat if the courts found in our favor zat it was originally appraised for ng for money in addition to that. Tecca stated that was correct. that Mr. Williams was not asking for in Pape stated that the bottom line Eor funding, since it wasn't dealt L-Trans and their plans have been to come from reserves for an amount al fee. He noted tha~ if this had ier, the State would have picked up . Public Services Director Tecca rould have paid 80~ of the cost. Boardmember Washburn stated that when the City shut down PAGE FIVE - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - MARCH 14~ 1995 Highway 74 because of the flooding problems at the Gunnerson Area some of the merchants were concerned since there was a disruption in traffic flow. He explained that the City placed signs on the barricades to inform the public that the businesses were open in the four corners area and he is sure something similar could be done for the businesses that will be affected by the bridge. Legal Counsel Harper reminded the Board that all that is on the Agenda is a verbal report and this item either needs to be Aqendized for fuller discussion at a subsequent meeting or a study session. He explained that the Board is not in a position to make a decision at this meeting since that was not what was noticed to the public. Boardmember Alonqi stated that he is asking the Board to set a study session to further investigate all the alternatives. He asked if the roadway could be built with compacted D.G. with a 3" base to assist in cutting the cost. Public Services Director Tecca explained that the reason the City needs a paved roadway is because of the ambunt of traffic it will carry and to keep the dust and particulants out of the air which would affect the air quality. He explained the process that would be needed and the problems that would occur. Boardmember Alongi stated that he feels that the biggest problem is the impact to the residential areas and the impact it will have on the school and buses. He stated that a portion will be sent down Franklin exposing the neighborhoods to unsafe conditions and there is no way that the City can control the traffic. He stated ~hat in his opinion it would be more economical in the long run to find a way to finance this project and as far as payment to Mr. Williams, it does not have to come from City funds, but rather be a credit for permits if Mr. Williams should choose to develop the property sometime in the future. Councilman Alongi fiqured that the cost for the roadway would be approximately $.48 per foot which would amount to about $15,000 per month for the rental of the property. He noted that the main objective is to find a way to put the detour in and keep the people off of the side streets. Boardmember Alongi stated that he would like to have a study session to address that. Mr. Bridges stated that there was a question as to how many cars go down Mission Trail onto Lakeshore and he noted that it was approximately 20,000 a day. He explained that it is the main artery coming to and going from town and he felt that if the roadway were blocked it would kill the City. Mr. Rooney asked if there was were adjacent properties near Mr. Williams where an alternate roadway could be built. Chairman Pape stated that there were none that he was aware of. Mr. Rooney confirmed that the property ran all the way from Lakeshore Drive to the School in that area. He stated that the City should not send the amount of traffic that would be generated through on small street and past the school. He explained that the roadways are in bad shape, and asked that the City try to find the money to have an alternate detour roadway. Chris Hyland stated that she has been a small business owner and if the City can find $160,000 to put in a boat dock then she felt that the City could find $120,000 to put in a detour roadway. She commended Mr. Williams for offering in the first place and pointed out the danger to the local small businesses. ~ . .~ . ~ . . ~. ' , ...y!~ .. I ~ ' . ~ ~, . ... . PAGE SIS - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - MARCH 14~ 1995 Boa~dmember Bender stated that he felt that this was.not an Agenda .item and that the Board should not even>be diseussing it: H2 explained that he has nq 'quarrel wi;th ~he< local bu!siness people and the City is nAt;trying'to put them!out of businzss; he has no quarrel with Boardmember Alongi•trying to bring s~omething forward,,but this`is not $120,000; or $200,000 or even $300,000 or $400,000 with the money defailed by Boardmember Alongi. He explained that he would not make a decision tonight or even discuss it further with this kind of information. PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED YTEMS None. ERECUT%VE DIRECTOR COMMENTS None. BOARDMEMBER COMMENTS None. CLOSED SESSION Noneo ADJOURNMENT THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING AAS ; ~ TESTa / ~~~ ~~ 1 ~ ~"~` ~IYCRI RASADo CLERR OF THE BOARD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AT 8:45 P.M. ~~ GC/ REVIN W. P E~ CHAIRMAN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF LARE ELSINORE MINIITES REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LARE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN 3TREET LARE ELSINORE, CALIFORNI2~ TIIESDAY~ APRIL lis 1995 •~*****ra***s**********s*******rs***r*raa*a**************a******s CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 8:41 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: ALONGI~ BENDERe BRINLEYs WASHBiJRN~ PAPE ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE Also present ~~ere: Executive Director Molendyk, Legal Counsel Harper, Administ~aLive Services Director Boone, City Planner Leslie, Building/Safety Manager Russell, Community Services Director Sapp, Public Services Director Tecca, Manager of Special Projects Watenpaugh and Clerk of the Board Kasad. PIIBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS Requests were received to address item no. 4 and deferred to that discussion. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY BRINLEYs SECONDED BY WA3HBURN AND CARRIED BY ONANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTEDe 1. The following Minutes were approved: (F:134.3) a, Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - March 28, 1995. 2. Received and ordered filed the Investment Report for February 28, 1995. (F:12.5) 3. Ratified the Warrant List for March 31, 1995. (F:12.3) Legal Counsel Harper requested that Resolution No. RDA 95-3 be added to the agenda for approval. MOVED SY WASHSORN SECONDED BY BRINLEY AND CARRYED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADD THIS ITEM TO THE AGENDA. MOVED BY WASHBIIRNs SECONDED BY BRINLEY AND CARRIED BY VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLIITION NO. RDA 95-3. RE30LUTION NO. RDA 95-3 A RE30LIITION OF THE LARE ELSINORE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. RDA 94-10 TO CONFIRM A38IGNMENT OF CERTAIN SPECIAL TAS BONDS BY THE LARE ELSINORE PIIBLIC FINANCING AIITHORITY WITH RESPECT TO A SINGLE ISSUE OF AIITHORITY BONDS AND PROVIDING OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. (F:126.5) PAGE TWO - REDE9ELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - APRIL SY~ 5995 BOSINESS ITEM 4e Detour Roadwav for Lakesfior~ Boardmember Alonai. (F:156.2) Executive Director Molendyk stated that this item was discussed previously, staff has been in contact with the property owner; and the item is now back for further consideration. Public Services Director Tecca gave an overview of the history of discussions on the Detour Roadway for the Lakeshore Drive Bridgeo He stated that the contractor has now been given the 1°Notice to Proceed'0, and due to the delays to date this project will be pushed into the next rainy seasono He explained that the 180 day contract period takes the City into the end of December and if there are no further delays this will still be into 1996 before the end of the project. Chairman Pape called upon the persons who requested to speak as follows: Hilda Bowen, Manager - Bank of America, 1495 E. Lakeshore Drive, stated that her firm does no~ want Lakesfiore Drive Bridge closed without the detour. Salvador Sepulveda, 31094 Wisconsin Streeto stated his objection to spending money on a temporary street. He suggested that the money be put into Pottery Street to extend it to Franklin Street. He explained that Redevelopment money is for the good of the community, and if that money is used, then it should be something that the community will continue ta use after the bridge is completeo Chris Hyland, 15191 Wavecrest Drive, stated that she felt that this was handled in an unprofessional manner since Boardmember Alongi was the person who originally negotiated this roadway; and then Chairman Pape and Boardmember Bender were sent instead of Boardmember Alongi to discuss the findings with Mr. Willians. She explained that she does not want to drive down Mill Street or any of the other side streets to get to the other side of Lakeshore Drive and she does not want to have to drive to the freeway as the other alternate to get to Vons. Mrs. Hyland stated that she felt that i~ was unjust to the businesses who will be affected by this closure. She pointed out the difference in costs between this temporary roadway and the Stadium and the fact that the Chairman did no~ have a problem with spending $25,000,000 on the Stadium, but will not agree to spend $145,000 on a roadway. She stated her intent to pursue a recall on Chairman Pape and Boardmember Bender. Rex Douglas, part owner of Tiffany°s Hallmark, 2497 E. Lakeshore Drive, stated that they have experienced road closures in the past and know that it impacts their businesso He asked that when the bridge is closed there be some type of de~our road provided across Mr. Williams° property. Pamela Presser, Representative of Management and Employees at the Vons Grocery Store, 2501 E. Lakeshore Drive, stated that if the bridge is closed they will loose many of their customers and that will impact current as well as future sales and profitability. She explained that the proposed alternate route will take people approximately 5 mi4es out of their way PAGE THREE - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINQTES - APRIL 11~ 1995 and the temporary roadway over Mr. Williams property would only be 1/4 of a mile. She asked that the Board consider the alternate route across Mr. Williams property which will help to save their businesse John Sell, 350 Railroad Canyon ltoad, stated that he is new in business in Lake Elsinore and stated that he felt that his business and all the surrounding businesses need the temporary detour road. Bob Richardson, My Buddy's Pizza, 2503 E. Lakeshore Drive, presented a letter from the Landlord of the entire Vons Shopping Plaza in support of the detour roadway across Mr. Williams property. He stated that the local businesses are approachinq the busy time of the year and the closure of the bridge would affect that as well as affecting public safety services. He pointed out the impact the closure will have on sales tax revenue as well as possible loss of local employment and potential loss of businesses. He further pointed out the impact of the traffic from the Storm baseball games. Darcy Rooney, stated that she has reviewed the cost of the roadway and stated that she had contacted contractors who do the type of work that will be necessary and stated that she acquired two bids from reputable construction companies for the cost of the roadway and removal only and received bids in the amount of $40,300 and $29,960 as opposed to the City's estimate of $97,000. Ms. Rooney stated that the scope of work could be reduced to save more money. She asked that Council consider this option. Lloyd Bridges, owner of property at 2006 Lakeshore Drive, stated that he felt that Councilman Alongi was the only person who showed concern for the business people who will be impacted by the closure of the bridqe. He asked Boardmember Washburn why Boardmember Alongi was removed from the negotiating committee. He asked why Mr. Washburn did not return his and the other business persons phone calls. He stated that their next step will be a court injunction. Lonny Robertson, Classic Hair Company, Mission Trail, asked what amount the Department of Transportation will pay for this project. He stated that he wants the community to flourish and not fail and would like to see some type of compromise to keep that area open. He requested help from Councilman Pape. Larry Corby, Budget Tire, 150 Lakeshore Drive, stated that this is a touqh economic time and asked that Council make everything come out well for everyone concerned. Mike Rooney, Canyon Battery, 2088 E. Lakeshore Drive, asked that Council consider an access road for the health of his business. He noted that he is the last business in line next to the bridge. He stated that he does not feel that it should cost as much as is estimated in the Agenda and stated that all of the businesses support the bridge and will profit from the new one when it is finished, if they are still in business, Boardmember Bender noted that this is the first time the Redevelopment Agency Board has had an opportunity to discuss this item. He informed the audience that he had suggested PAGE FOUR - AGENCY MINUTES - APRIL 3Y~ 1995 that he and Chairman Pape meet with Mr. Williams and not Boardmember Washburn. He stated that although Mr. Washburn is Mayor, fhis is an RDA matter and it was not his decision. He stated that he and Mr. Pape are the Chairman and Vice Chairman and that since it was an RDA matter he felt that it should be addressed by them. He stated that their meeting with Mr, Williams was successful and the purpose of this item is to discuss the dollars required to produce the project. Boardmember Alongi stated that if the Council had known about Mr. Williams opposition to the roadway, the issue would not have come this far. He stated that at the last Council Meeting no one questioned Public Services Director Tecca as to why the City lost the access road. He stated that he called Mr. Williams and asked why he wanted to hold the whole city hostage when the City and Mr. Wiiliams have a legal problem. He stated that his main problem is how the City prices the project out. He pointed out that this is why he says that there is a true statement and a statement of truth. He noted that the true statement is that the project adds up to $145,000 and the statement of truth is that the $25,000 which would go to Mr. Williams, which he is entitled to, he wants to take as credit towards permits for future work on his property. Boardmember Alongi stressed that it is not hard dollars from the City's pocket. He stated that this is soft dollars, and it will be paid to him eventually, but not at this time. Ae made note of each item listed on the total amount of the project and pointed out the way that the Engineering Department could cut corners. He noted that this is an issue of money and not items. He pointed out that the City gave money to the Chamber of Commerce for Economic Development and yet when Council is faced with the prospect of assisting the local businesses they start pointing out the financial problems that the City has. He explained that the City already has a$3,500,000 deficit and he felt that another $70,000 or $80,000 is not going to make ~hat much difference if it will save even one business in the community. He pointed out the dangers of using the freeway as an alternate traffic route and e~cplained that senior citizens do not like to drive on the freeway and they will be using Mill Street, along with a lot og other people and this is a real danger since there are so many children on Mill Street, as well as an elementary school. He noted the problems on Franklin Street regarding traffic and the danger of fhe curves on that roadway. Councilman Alongi stated that the bridge is a necessary item, but it is also necessary to have a proper alternate roadway. He stated that the Council should be more responsible for the reserves and not place the budget in a deficit. Councilman Alongi stated that this Council Meeting was not going to be televised by Cable 3 because they were tolcl that it was going to be a short meetinq. Yie explained that no one should guess how long a meeting will take, since there is no way to know what each person wishes to address and he intends to reveal the truth. Boardmember Washburn stated that he is aware ~hat there are some people very upset about the bridge, but it has been in existence since 1923 and is unsafe for pedestrians. He explained that the bridge is 80% funded by the State of California and the funding will not last forever. the PAGE FIVE - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINQTES - APRIL il~ 1995 cost for the alternate roadway was set aside and due to circumstances, was lost and now it is up to the City to find a way to make an alternate route. He stated that he did talk to Darcy Rooney today and previously had the Deputy City Clerk inform her that he was working on the problems of the bridge and alternate routes and that he would qet back to her. He explained that he did instruct Public Services Director Tecca to meet with the business owners in the affected area to discuss the issues. He commented that there are three bridges over San Jacinto River now, one the old bridge; the freeway bridge and Casino Drive Bridge. Boardmember Washburn pointed out that with 20~ of the cost of the bridge to the City, the cost of the roadway would be nearly 15g of what the project is costing the City for the bridge. He stated that for those persons who would not want the bridge, there would be a lot more people than are present, that would not allow that action. He pointed out the problems that the City faced building Railroad Canyon Road and noted that this project has the same problems. He noted that he is not opposed to having a minimal road built at a minimal price to handle business traffic and that he feels that it is important to build the bridge and it is important to accommodate the businesses and to do so without overspending. Chairman Pape asked if the City could cut costs by foregoing the right of entry documents. Legal Counsel Harper stated that the $3,000 is for the cost of preparation and recordation of the documents. Chairman Pape asked if the City could do the road without the documents. Legal Counsel Harper advised that was not possible. Councilman Alongi stated that if the owner does not require the documents then they don't need to be done. Legal Counsel Harper reiterated that they would be required. Chairman Pape asked what the documents do. Legal Counsel Harper stated that the documents qive the City the right of ownership and provide the City the means to cover any accidents that might occur, as required by the JPIA. He explained that the statute for frauds requires this. He noted that Mr. Williams would require documents that would specifically grant a specific r~adway and that the City would indemnify Mr. Williams against any damage that might occur on that roadway. He pointed out that the cost is figured by the righi-of-way consultant and he does not know the facts that the~se figures were drawn from. Public Works Director Tecca ex,~lained that the cost is figured based on the engineering rE:quired. Chairman Pape asked if Highway 74 would be open before this project begins. Public Services Director Tecca stated that the current water flow will allow the City to open Highway 74 by approximately May 1. Chairman Pape asked if the road could be built for less and whether it would be a hazard. Public Services Director Tecca stated that the first issue is reducing the design standards and explained that it cannot be done since there is a Federal minimum design standard that must be met to prevent liability in case there should be an accident. He explained the bid amounts for the alternate roadway and how the Engineer's escimate is established. He noted as an example that the Engineer's estimate for the bridge was $2,400,000 and the actual low bid was $2,290,000. Chairman Pape inquired if the City does not build the road to proper standards, would the insurance company cover us and the City would be liable. Public Services Director Tecca confirmed. Chairman Pape asked how long it would take if the City were to explore the PAGE S%% - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MIN[ITES -~PRIL ile 1995 extension of Franklin Street, and how long it would take to evaluate the potential. Public Services Director Tecca stated that the problem with that is the purchase of right-of-way through Pottery Street and the excess costs. Boardmember Alongi stated that Mr. Williams is a community minded person and asked if he is willing to spread out the amount of land that the City needs, up to 100 foot on each side of the road, would the acquisition be necessary. He suggested that the City would then not need to contain itself to a specific 28 or 30 foot area. Public Services Director Tecca sta~ed that it would reduce the cost of the right-of-way engineeringe Boardmember Alongi stated that if there is no additional charge beyond the $25,000 then there is no problem. Public Services Director Tecca confirmed that statement. Boardmember Alongi stated that he had a discussion with Mr. Tecca regarding not using sub-base and just compacting the roadway and using 3 1/2 inches of asphalt. Iie asked if the SPIA would cover this. Mr. Tecca stated that it would. Boardmember Alongi stated that if the asphalt is applied properly and the roadway is stripped properly then there should be no problems with the JPIA. Mr. Tecca confirmed that statement. Boardmember Alongi stated that he has a problem with the bidding procedure, and explained that if the City of Lake Elsinore puts the tax dollars up, they should have a say in who gets the job. He indicated that he objects to using contractors from out of the area and feels that the tax clollars should remain within the City to benefit the City residents. He stated that when a law is unfair, action must be taken to do something to change the law. Legal Counsel Harper stated that the Public Contracts Code requires that the City advertise and award to the lowest bidder, He stated that Boardmember Alongi asked what could be done about it, and explained that he has been in litigation over the last 15 years in arguments over whether the low bidder complied with the literal term of the bid specifications. Lega1 Counsel Harper explained that if the City went out and awarded to someone just because they are local and the City appreciated their price, he could guarante2 that the City would be sued and he guaranteed that the City would loose and pay their lost profite Boardmember Alongi stated that he has discussed this issue witla the City Attorney, and the bottom line is that it is not up to the City, the bidder or public, but rather the courts and he feels that it is time to see that this situation is resolved. He stressed that this is a temporary road. Legal Counsel Harper stated that it is a public project and explained that the answer is not the judge, but rather the legislature. He explained ~hat if Boardmember Alonqi could convince Senator Haynes ~o carry a bill to make ~he City exempt, ~hen great. Vice Chairman Bender stated that he feels that this detour road is needed since it is a high traffic roadway and in consideration of the Lake and its activities and the ballfield and its activities, he feels that the roadway is necessarye He expressed concern reqarding the alternate detours indicated that he feels the access roadway will be a more useful road to the City. He stated that the bids will set the amount necessary to build the road and costs tend to get lower with PAGE SEVEN - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MIN[TTES - APRIL 11~ 1995 competitive bidding. Boardmember Bender stated that the critical issue is not the bidders or all the other thinqs discussed, but rather where we will get the money to pay for this project. He stated that the bottom line is money and asked that the Board focus on this issue to reach an agreement as to where the money can come from. Boardmember Brinley stated that she agreed with Vice Chairman Bender and the City must stay within the law. She asked if Mr. Williams would be willing to waive his fee of $25,000 to aid the local businessman. She requested that staff explore this possibility and see if it would be possible to come up with a lower fee. Boardmember Alongi stated that the $25,000 is a normal fee that the City would pay any property owner for the use of their property. He stated that Mr. Williams is willinq to take this in the form of a credit and it is not cash out of pocket. He indicated that he felt that the Board was trying to mislead the public. He suggested if the Council was going to take action to ask Mr. Williams to donate, then it would be appropriate to ask for a donation from the Lehr's for the extra parking or the State for the Lake, without RDA funds for K-Mart and Walmart. He explained that the money can be drawn from the reserves and indicated that funds can be pulled from the reserves when it benefits three members of the Board. He stated that there always seems to be money when those persons want somethinq, but none when there is something that they don't want. He stated that if the Board was serious and wanted to assist the people, they would vote on the $80,000 and get it done. Chairman Pape stated that he feels that the Council is working to make this project come together and democracy is where majority rules; and if there are 5 people on the Council and the majority is in agreement on the issue then it is approved. BOARDMEMBER ALONGI MOVED TO APPROVE THE ALTERNATE ROADWAY FOR $80~000. MOTION DIED FOR LACR OF A£,ECOND. Boardmember Brinley stated that she felt that Boardmember Alongi was speaking out of turn and the Board was not trying to mislead and there areno sides. She further stated that everyone wants to see this succeed and no one wants to cutoff Boardmember Alonqi, but what the Board is trying to do is find a happy medium that the City can afford. She explained that she is not trying to take anything away from Mr. Williams, she was just makinq a suqqestion to see if it would be possible to ~ej~iimg l~eta~tenprofwaffine 6Tfllia~e ~ti~stlm~rt3y~hbufrs jnet asking for assistance. Boardmember*p1465XBrs~d that she felt that Boardmember Alongi was trying to mislead the people by going over what is said and tryinq to explain it. She commented that the people do not need him to tell them what to think, because they can think for themselves. Vioe Chairman Bender stated that Mr. Williams was not the problem; and Mr. Williams would probably go along with the $25,000 and that is a credit. He when he met with him he felt that Mr. Williams was a gentleman and was trying to help the Community. He asked if there are funds in one of PAGE EIGHT - REDEVELOPMENT AGENC% MINUTES - APRIL lio 1995 the Redevelopment Project Areas that the Board could borrow temporarily. Legal Counsel Harper stated that in the last issue, $1,000,000 was set aside to complete the Collier Avenue Acquisition. He suggested that if half of that money is gone and the City has acquired the remaining half, it may or may not qo depending on the status of the eminent domain litigation which is on hold, pending some type of resolution with the property owner, which has been compounded by the floodo Ae stated that even though the bond issue cites that the funds are intended for Collier Avenue, by making appropria~e findings there is no legal difficulty with the Agency, on a short term basis, redirecting the funds for a legal RDA project. Legal Counsel Harper stated that the credit is not within the realm of the Redevelopment Agency to grant, since it would not be RDA money, but rather City moneyg therefore the RDA could justify paying to the City the $25,000 to be used as a credita Chairman Pape asked that a'short ~erm1B be defined, Legal Counsel Harper explained that B1short term/0 would be approximately one year pendinq this project. He stated that if the money is not spent on Collier Ave. it is not necessary ~o replace it, but if it is needed, then it will have to be repaid to have the funds available, Vice Chairman Bender stated that due to the water problems on Collier Avenue, this would be a good source for temporary funding. MOnED BY BENDER TO GRANT THE STAFF THE AUTHORITY TO PROCEED WZT$ THE DETOUR SPECIFICATION3 AND CON3TRUCTION BY STANDARD PROCEDURES AND GRANT THE $25~000 FROM THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO THE CITY TO PROVIDE A CREDIT FOR MR. WILLIAM3. Vice Chairman Bender asked if that was a legal motion. Legal Counsel Harper stated that it is as long as the finding is stated that it is a Redevelopment Project is of benefit to all the project areas and based upon that fact the agency has determined to allocate bond proceeds, which have been heretofore allocated to the acquisition of Collier Avenue. Vice Chairman Bender asked that the City Clerk state the motion with the addition of Legal Counsel Harper°s finding. MOVED BY BENDER~ SECONDED BY ALONGY TO GRANT THE STAFF THE AUTHORITY TO PROCEED WITH THE DETOIIR SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTROCTION BY STANDARD PROCEDIIRES AND GRANT THE $25~000 FROM THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO THE CITY TO PROVIDE A CREDIT FOA MR. WILLIAMS WITH THE FINDING THAT THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT IS OF BENEFIT TO ALL THE PROJECT AREAS AND BASED UPON THE FACT THAT THE AGENCY HAS DETERMINED TO ALLOCATE BOND PROCEEDSo WHICH HAVE HERETOFORE BEEN ALLOCATED TO THE ACQUISITYON OF COLLIER AVENUE. Boardmember Alongi stated that he feels that it is fine to allocate the funds in tha~ nanner, but if the credit is given to Mr. Williams and he does not develop his property, the City does not pay the $25,000. He explained that this amount would be only to Mr. Williams and not to anyone else. Vice Chairman Bender stated that Mr. Williams indicated that he wanted the credit to develop his property and he concurs with Boardmember Alongi. City Manager Molendyk requested clarification that this action PAGE NINE - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINOTES - APRIL lls 1995 is to transfer funds from RDA to the City and if the authorization is not needed then it will still be on record should the funds be needed within the next year. Chairman Pape stated that the property is prime commercial property and when he and Vice Chairman Bender met with Mr. Williams he indicated that part of that area was already in negotiation and as a result of the roadway it will level some of his property as part of the benefit and there will be a new bridqe. He stated that the $25,000 should off-set some of the improvements that the property will realize. He asked if the maker of the motion would consider that. Vice Chairman Bender stated that he would not. THE FOREGOING MOTION WAS APPROVED OPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: BOARDMEMBERSS ALONGI~ BENDER~ PAPE NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: BRINLEY~ WASHBURN ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE ASSTAINB BOARDMEMBERB: NONE PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS None. ERECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS None. SOARDMEMBER COMMENT3 None. CLOSED SESSION None. ADJOURNMENT THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEET,,.~E~TG W,~f E.M. ~ ~ ~ ADJOIIRNED AT 10:03 (,`~ ~~~ ~ w. r~P ,, cxr,ixt~r,x ELOPMEbT~ AGENCY RR OF THE BOARD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINiJTEB REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LARE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LARE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 1995 **,t,t****,t,t*****,t,t,t*****~***,t,t,t**,t**,t*,t*********err,t,t**~e*,t*r*****• CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 9:13 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: AB3ENT: . ALONGI~ BENDER~ BRINLEY~ PAPE~ WASHBIIRN . NONE Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Legal Counsel Harper, City Planner Leslie, Building & Safety Manager Russell, Community Services Director Sapp, Public Services Director Tecca, Manager of Special Projects Watenpaugh and Clerk of the Board Kasad. POBLYC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS None Requested. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY BRINLEY~ SECONDED BY WASHBIIRN AND CARRIED BY IINANIMOOS VOTE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTEDe 1. Ratified Warrant List for April 13, 1995. (F:12.3) 2. Approved Change Order No. 3 for the Mission Trail & Malaga Road Intersection Project, in the amount of $11,235.41. (F:156.2) 3. Accepted Notice of Completion for Mission Trail & Malaga Road Intersection Project for R.J. Noble Company. (F:156.2) PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS None. E%ECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS None. BOARDMEMBER COMMENTS None. CLOSED SESSION None. PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT ~GENC% MINUTES - APRgL 250 1995 ADJ04lRNMEN't° THE REGIILAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETYNG WI-$~ADJOU~NED AT l:14 P.l~io ,~,~~ w. ~ Eo cxr,xatrsArp ~LOPMENT d,GENC7[ OF THE BOARD 12EDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINQTES REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINOTES CITY OF LARE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA TIIESDAY~ MAY 9~ 1995 ~'~., ~., ft~lr~lrlr+Yie**+rAiF1FAA*iFiFiFIF1FiF1F1klk*fk*f****ikl4iFfFlk~ic!!liii#rikik##***IkIF+k*AAA** CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment Aqency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 8:35 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: ALONGI~ BENDER~ PAPE~ WASHBIIRN ASSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: BRINLEY Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Legal Counsel Harper, City Planner Leslie, Buildinq & Safety Manager Russell, Community Services Director Sapp, Public Services Director Tecca, Manager of Special Projects Watenpauqh and Clerk of the Board Kasad. PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEM3 None requested. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY WASHBIIRN~ SECONDED BY ALONGI AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: (F:134.3) a. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - April 11, 1995. b. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meetinq - April 25, 1995. 2. Received and ordered filed the Ynvestment Report for March 31, 1995. (F:12.5) 3. Ratified Warrant List for April 28, 1995. (F:12.3) BUSINESS ITEM 4. RDA Ordinance No. 2- Establishina Guidelines f.or_~roe:~ssina those Claims for Monev or Damaaes not now Govern~c: ;~v Stat=_ or Local Laws. (F:52.1) Chairman Pape noted that this was the ~~s.:~e as the itE:~: discussed on the City Council Agenda. MOVED BY WASHBIIRNo SECONDED BY ALONGI TO ADOPT RD~, OR:~INANCE NO. 2 UPON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY: RDA ORDINANCE NO. 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA~ ESTABLISHING GUIDELINEB FOR PROCESSING THOSE CLAIM3 POR MONEY OR DAMAGES NOT NOW GOVERNED BY STATE OR LOCAL LAWS. PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCH MINQTES - MA% 9B 1995 UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTEs B~YES 9 CO[dNCILMEMBERS 6 NOESS COUNCILMEMBERS: AHSENTA COIINCILMEMBERB: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED Nonea ALONGY, BENDEFZo PAPE, WA3HBORN NONE HRINLES NONE ITEM~ ERECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS Noneo BOARDMEMBER COMMENTS None. '%'HE REDEVEZOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WAS RECESSED RT 8036 P.M. THF. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WAS RECONVENED AT 8:44 P.M. CL03ED SESSION a. Joint Closed Seasion with Redevelopment Agency - Lake Elsinore Associates - Case #200767. THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING ATAS ADJOURNED TO A JOINT CL03ED SESSION WITH THE CITY COUNCIL AT 8:45 P.M. TO DISCUSS THE ABOVE MENTEONED ITEM. THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WAS RECONVENED AT 9:14 P.M. NO ACTION TAREN. ADJOURNMENT THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WAS,,ADJOURNED AT 9:14 P.M. ~ ~~ ?~EVIN W. P PE~ CHAIRMAN I~2EDEVELOPMENT AGENCY if Z ST: ~~} /~r ,~ V `... ~ ,i~CJ~. (h~~~ ~ V~CRY RASADe ~IERR OF THE BOARD REDF,VELO?21EK7 ;GENCY MINUTES REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LARE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA TOESDAY~ MAY 28~ 1995 ***r**t**ttara,k,k*ss,k***t***********t**ttta*rraa*,k**ft*arat***,k***** CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 7:45 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: ALONGI~ BENDER~ BRINLEY~ PAPE ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: WASHBURN Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Leqal Counsel Harper, Administrative Services Director Boone, City Planner Leslie, Building & Safety Manager Russell, Community Services Director Sapp, Public Services Director Tecca, Manager of Special Projects Watenpaugh, Special Projects Coordinator Wood and Clerk of the Board Kasad. A. Rebort on Lake Elsinore Outlet Center. Presented as part of City Council Meeting. B. Announcement - Utility User Tax. Chairman Pape noted that particular concern has been expressed with regard to the upcoming consideration of a Utility User Tax. He advised that based on discussions yesterday, and a phone call this afternoon, it appears that the existing Bonds can be refinanced at a lower rate. He further advised that this action will make in unnecessary to consider a Utility Tax at this time and noted that additional details should be available tomorrow. PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEM3 None Requested. CONSENT CALENDAR The following item was pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion and consideration: Item No. 4. MOVED BY BRINLEY~ SECONDED BY BENDER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. ' 1. The following Minutes were approved: a. Reqular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - May 9, 1995. 2. Received and ordered filed the Investment Report for April 30, 1995. PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - MAY 2$~ 1995 3. Ratified Warrant List for May 15, 1995. ITEM PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 4. Fiscal Aaent Aareement - Community Facilities District 90-2 (Tuscanv Hills) - Resolution No. RDA 95-4. Boardmember Alongi indicated that he would be voting "No" on this item. MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY BENDER AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 3 TO 3 WITH ALONGI CASTING THE DI3SENTING VOTE AND WASHBIIRN ABSENT TO APPROVE THE FISCAL AGENT AGREEMENT AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95- 4. RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-4 A RESOLIITION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LARE ELSINORE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING E%ECUTION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE FISCAL AGENT AGREEMENT AND PROVIDING OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. (COMMUNITY FACILITY DISTRICT NO. 90-2 - TUSCANY HILLS PIIBLIC IMPROVEMENT3 - 1990 SPECIAL TAX BONDS). BUSINESS ITEM 5. Second Readina - RDA Ordinance No. 2- Establishina Guidelines for Processing those Claims for Monev or Damages not now Governed bv State or Local Laws. MOVED BY BENDER~ 3ECONDED BY BRINLEY TO ADOPT RDA ORDINANCE NO. 2 UPON SECOND READING BY TITLE ONLY. RDA ORDINANCE NO. 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIAo ESTABLISHING GIIIDELINES FOR PROCESSING TH03E CLAIMS FOR MONEY OR DAM~GES NOT NOW GOVERNED BY STATE OR LOCAL LAAS. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: ALONGI~ BENDER~ BRINLEY~ PAPE NOES: BOARDMEMBERB: NONE AB3ENT: BOARDMEMBERS: WASHBURN ABSTAIN: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS No Comments. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENT3 No Comments. BOARDMEMBER COMMENT3 No Comments. THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WA3 RECE3SED AT 7:48 P.M. PAGE THREE - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - MAY 28s 1995 THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECONVENED AT 8:44 P.M. CL03ED SE38ION a. ti55o~ia~e~ - ~ase ~avvini. THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WAS ADJOURNED TO A JOINT CLOSED SESSION WITH THE CITY COUNCIL AT 8:45 P.M. TO DISCUSS THE ABOVE MENTIONED MATTER. THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECONVENED AT 9:30 P.M. NO ACTION TAREN. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY PAPE~ SECONDED BY BRINLEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR REDEp~LOPMENT AGENCY MEETING AT 9:31 P.M. % ~ G(~ AT EST: ~~ VICRI RA A~ CLER OF THE BOARD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY W. PAP~~ CHAIRMAN LOPMEN AGENCY MINIITES REGIILAR EtEDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LARE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA TIIESDAY~ JUNE 13~ 1995 ~~, t***********rr~~~****~************a**********t********r**~******* , i ' CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 11:16 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: ALONGI~ BENDER~ BRINLEY~ WASHBIIRN~ PAPE ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Legal Counsel Aarper; Administrative Services Director Boone, City Planner Leslie, Building & Safety Manager Russell, Community Services Directo;- Sapp, Public Services Director Tecca, Manager of Special Projects Watenpaugh and Clerk of the Board Kasad. PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEM3 None requested. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items were pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion and consideration: Item Nos. 4 & 5. MOVED BY WASHBIIRN~ SECONDED BY BRINLEY AND CARRIED BY IINANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: a. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - May 23, 1995. (F:134.3) 2. Ratified Warrant List for May 31, 1995. (F:12.3) 3. Awarded Contract for Lakeshore Drive Bridge Detour Roadway to Kunze Inc. of Riverside, in the amount of $54,762. (F:156.2) ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 4. Lakeshore Drive Bridae Detour Roadway - Chanae Order No. 1 for Construction Management. (F:156.2) 5. Lakeshore Drive Bridge Reconstruction Project - Chanae Order , Nos. 1 and 2. (F:156.2j Councilman Alongi noted that the bridge project has just begun and there are already change orders. He questioned what the contractors are looking at. He indicated that gas and sewer lines have always been their. MOVED BY BRINLEY~ SECONDED BY BENDER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ON THE LARESHORE DRIVE BRIDGE DETOUR ROADWAY. PAGE TAO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - JONE 13~ 1995 MOVED BY WA3HBURN~ 3ECONDED BY BRINLEY AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4 TO 1 WITH ALONGI CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE TO APPROVE CHANGE ORDERS 1 AND 2 FOR THE LARESHORE DRIVE BRIDGE RECON3TRIICTION PROJECT. BIISINES3 ITEM None. PUBLIC COMMENT3 - NON-AGENDIZED ITEM3 None. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS None. BOARDMEMBER COMMENT3 None. CL03ED SESSION None. THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 11:20 P.M. ~ A EST: ~ VICRI RAS ~ CLERR OF THE BOARD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY W. PAP~~ CHAIRMAN ILOPMENT AGENCY MINLTlES REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ***~*~****************************************************~****** CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 8:49 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: ALONGI, BENDER, BRINLEY, WASHBURN, PAPE ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Legal Counsel Harper, Administrative Services Director Boone, City Planner Leslie, Community Services Director Sapp, Public Services Director Tecca, Building and Safety Manager Russell, Manager of Special Projects Watenpaugh, City Treasurer Kelley, and Deputy City Clerk Bryning. PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS None. ~ 4 CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BRINLEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: a. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - June 13, 1995. 2. Ratified Warrant List for June 15, 1995. 3. Approved the acceptance of Right-of-Way Permit for the Lakeshore Drive Bridge Detour Roadway. 4. Approved Change Order No. 3 for the Lakeshore Drive Bridge Reconstruction Project. PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS None. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS None. BOARDMEMBER COMMENTS None. ADJOURNMENT THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 8:51 P.M. i- PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - JUNE 27, 1995 Respectfully submitted, . , Adria L. Bry ng, De ty C' y Clerk AT EST: V (r • ` ~a~ ~y~; .~ VICKI KAS , CLERK OF THE BOARD REDEVELOPMENT AG'ENCY MINOTES REGIILAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LARE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA TUESDAY~ JULY 11~ 1995 •r*tt*r*****a**fe******,-****,r,-,-*************************~********• CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 8:16 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: ALONGI~ BENDER~ BRINLEY~ WASHF~UItN~ PAPE ABSENTS BOARDMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Asaistant Executive Director Watenpaugh, Acting Legal Counsel Burns, Administrative Services Director Boone, Community Development Director Leslie, Community Services Director Sapp, Engineering Manager O'Donnell, Building & Safety Manager Russell, Special Projects Manaqer Best and Clerk of the Board Kasad. PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS None requested. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY BRINLEY~ SECONDED BY WASHBIIRN AND CARRIED BY IINANIMOOS VOTE TO APPROVE THE CON3ENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. Approved the following Minutes: a. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting of June 27, 1995. (F:134.3) 2. Ratified the Warrant List for June 30, 1995. (F:12.3) 3. Monthly Report of Investments for May 31, 1995. (F:12.5) 4. Authorized the RDA and City Budget to cover the interim expenses of the Stadium in the amount of $450,000. (F:134.10)(X:30.1) 5. Concurred with City Council Action to Approve the Settlement Agreement with EVMWD regarding Financial Issues. (F:68.1)(X:164.2) PUBLIC COMMENTS None. E%ECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS None. BOARDMEMBER CO None. CLOSED SESSION None. PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - JIILY ll~ 1995 ADJOURNMENT The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting y~as adjourned at 8:17 p.m. lf ~ /~ ~ ~'/ ~~~ Gr"A~ ~ / v' EVIN W. PAPE, CHAIRMAN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AT ES1°6 c,'1.,~~l~~ ~~~ 9ICIt% RASAD~ CLHRR dF THE BOARD REDEVELOPMF.w:':' AGENCY MINOTES REGIILAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LARE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA TUESDAY~ JIILY 25~ 1995 **ir**iiirlkfkftfirir#rikikirik#!**ii!*~!***ir*t**lieiririrtrieik+klkfF**Airikik+kfe*!lirie+k+k+k+k CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 8:0o p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: BENDER~ BRINLEY~ PAPE~ WASHBURN ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: ALONGI Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Assistant Executive Director Watenpaugh, Legal Counsel Harper, Administrative Services Director Boone, Community Development Director Leslie, Community Services Director Sapp, Public Services Director Tecca and Clerk of the Board Kasad. PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS None requested. CON3ENT CALENDAR MOVED BY BRINLEY~ SECONDED BY BENDER AND CARRIED P.Y UNANIMOUS 90TE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: (F:134.3) a. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - July 11, 1995. 2. Ratified Warrant List for July 14, 1995. (F:12.3) 3. Adopting Resolution No. RDA 95-5, Confirming Fiscal Year 1995-96 Special Taxes for CFD 90-2 (Tuscany Hills Public Improvements). (F;22.3) RESOLIITION NO. RDA 95-5 A RESOLIITION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA~ REQUESTING THE TAX COLLECTOR OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TO PLACE SPECIAL TAXES ON THE BILLS OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES. (COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 90-2) 4. Adopted Resolution No. RDA 95-6, Relating to the 1985 Mortgage Revenue Bonds. (F:126.5) RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-6 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA~ AUTHORZZING THE APPOINTMENT OF A SUCCE880R TRIISTEE AND AUTHORIZING THE ESECUTION OF A FIRST AND 3ECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE OF TRIIST IN CONNECTION WITH ITS VARIABLE RATE DEMAND MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENIIE BONDS (MERCURY SAVING3 AND LOAN PROJECT) 1985 SERIES A. PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINQTES - JULY 25~ Y995 PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS None. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS None. BOARDMEMBER COMMENTS None. CLOSED SESSION None. THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY P.Mo AT '~S'r a ` ~~.,1~,(-`~~~ VYCK~ a~ASAD, CLErR OF THE BOARD °.EDEVELOPMENT ::CGNCY ;ING AS ADJOIIRNED AT 8:02 . ; ~ ,;~j W. PAFEo CHAIRMAN ILOPMENT AGENCI' MINUTES REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LARE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA AUGUST 8~ 1995 ******a**t****~*a*****r******aa*****~~r**a****~**************** CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 7:46 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: ALONGI~ BENDERe BRINLEYe PAPE~ WA3HBURN ABSENTB BOARDMEMBER3: NONE Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Assistant Executive Director Watenpaugh, Legal Counsel Harper, Administrative Services Director Boone, Community Development Director Leslie, Engineerinq Manager Tecca and Clerk of the Board Kasad. PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS None Requested. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY BRINLEYs 3ECONDED BY WA3HBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: (F:134.3) a. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - July 25, 1995. 2. Received and ordered filed the Investment Report for June 30, 1995. (F:12.5) 3. Ratified Warrant List for July 31, 1995. (F:12.3) 4. Approved Change Orders No. 5& 6 for the Lakeshore Drive Bridge Reconstruction. (F:156.2) 5. Approved Change Order No. 1 Lakeshore Drive Detour Roadway. (E:156.2) 6. Concurred with Council Action to Deny Zone Change 95-1 at 215 Chaney Street for Roy Terrebonne. (Fs172.2) PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEM3 i None. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS None. BOARDMEMBER COMMENTS None. THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WAS RECESSED AT 7:47 P.M. _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ __ ___ _ PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - AUGUST 8~ 1995 TAE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECONVENED AT 8:04 P.M. CLOSED SESSION a. Lake Elsinore Associates vs. City - Case #200767. THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WAS ADJOIIRNED TO A JOINT CL03ED SESSION WITH THE CITY COUNCIL AT 8:05 P.M. TO DISCUSS THE ABOVE MENTIONED ITEM. THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECONVENED AT 8:49 P.M. NO ACTION TAREN. MOVED BY PAPE~ SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOIIS VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENC,7F ME ING AT 8:50 P.M. : /~'~ ~/ ~ ' _~~~~~ ' ~~' EVIN W. PAP ~ CHAIRMAN `REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY A EST: / ~ (/~/C~'~"(./\ VICKI RASAD~ CLERR OF THE BOARD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MixuTEs REGIILAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LARE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA TUESDAY~ AUGIIST 22~ 1995 *t**,t***te~r*,t**********t********,k,k,k,k,k,k****tttt**t**********,k,k,k,k*,k,k,k CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 7:39 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMSERS: ALONGI~ SENDER~ WASHBURN~ PAPE ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERSe BRINLEY Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Assistant Executive Director Watenpaugh, Legal Counsel Harper, Administrative Services Direcotr Boone, Community Development Director Leslie, PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDI2ED ITEMS A request was received to address Item No. 4 of this agenda and deferred to that discussion. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items were pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion and consideration: Item Nos. 3 and 4. MOVED BY BENDER~ SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CON3ENT CALENDAR A3 PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: (F:134.3) a. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - August 8, 1995. 2. Ratified Warrant List for August 15, 1995. (F:12.3) iTEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 3. Mortaaae Assistance Program - K. Hovanian Company - Resolution No. RDA 95-7. (F:87.2) Legal Counsel Harper asked that this item be amended regarding the Owner Participation Agreement and stated that the Lending Agency asked that several non-substantive amendments be made prior to approval of this item. Boardmember Alongi stated that he is happy to see this item on the Agenda. He noted that on page 6 of 19 it clearly states: " The Agency has determined that the development of the Site in accordance with this Agreement will eliminate blight and provide needed low and moderate income housing". He expressed suprised that Council would approve of this item since they have consistently stated that there is no need for low to moderate income housing. PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - AUGUST 22, 1995 MOVED BY ALONGI TO APPROVE THE MORTGAGE MOTION DIED FOR LACR OF A SECOND. PROGRAM. Boardmember Bender stated that this is the second such program the Redevelopment Agency has approved. He pointed out that the money is being put up by the Developer and anything that is not used will be returned to them after the units are sold, along with other monies returned into the Redevelopment Agency as payments made by the recipients of these funds, which helps to perpetuate additional funds into similar type of proqram. He asked Legal Counsel if the amendments requested will substantially alter the agreement as it is presented in the Agenda. Legal Counsel Harper stated that it will not and explained that the amendments do not affect the substance of the agreement at all. Boardmember Bender asked that since this is similar to the first Agreement that the Redevelopment Agency did, will the amendments water the agreement down so that the next person that comes along would asked to have the agreement changed even more. Legal Counsel Harper stated that there is that possibility, but most probably will not happen since the amendments were made due to an Internal Revenue Code and will allow the Developer to gain a tax break by conforming to the Code through this agreement. MOVED BY ALONGI~ SECONDED BY BENDER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT AITH It. HOVANIAN AND ADOPT RESOLIITION NO. RDA 95-7 AS FOLLOWS: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF LARE ELSINORE, APPROVING A CERTAIN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF LARE ELSINORE AND R. HOVANIAN COMPANY IN ACCORDANCE WITH A CERTAIN MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. Set Public Hearina Date of September 12, 1995, for the followina• a. Second Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement dated March 25, 1993, with Camelot Properties as it relates to Phase II of the development located at Malaqa/Mission Trail. (F:134.7)(8:134.10j Chris Hyland, 15191 Wavecrest Drive, indicated that she will not be able to attend the public hearing on this item, so she would make her comments at this time. She pointed out that the recent tax rolls show Camelot as still owing their taxes. She stressed that this project is reimbursed by the Redevelopment Agency and the Board should be sure their taxes are paid up before granting further allowances. MOVED BY BENDER~ SECONDED BY WASHBURN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE ABOVE LISTED POBLIC HEARING DATE. PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDI2ED ITEMS None. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS None. PAGE THREE - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - AOGUST 22~ 1995 None. CLOSED SESSION a. Lake Elsinore Associates vs. Redevelopment Agency - Case #200767. b. Palmer vs. Redevelopment Agency - Case #267394. CL03ED SESSION WAS NOT CONVENED DUE TO LACR OF NEW INFORMATION. ADJOURNMENT THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WA3 ADJOORNED AT 7:94 P.M. TTEST: ~ ~ ~~ VICRI RASAD~ CLE R OF THE BOARD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY / //~ v~-~ A. PAPE~ CHAIRMAN ILOPMENT AGENCY 4 MINUTES REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LARE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LARE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA September 12, 1995 *,k****,t,k,k,t,k~**~te,k,t*,k**,k+rt**,tt**~a***s,k***,k***,k*,t*,t******t~,k******* CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 7:25 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: SENDER, BRINLEY, WASHBURN, PAPE ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: VACANT Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Assistant Executive Director Watenpaugh, Legal Counsel Harper, Administrative Services Director Boone, Community Development Director Leslie, Community Services Director Sapp, Public Services Director Tecca and Clerk of the Board Kasad. PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS Requests were received to address Item No. 6 and deferred to that discussion. CONSENT CALENDAR , The £ollowing item was pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion and consideration: Item No. 4. MOVED BY WA3HBURN, SECONDED BY BRINLEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOU3 VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR A3 PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: a. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - August 22, 1995. (F:134.3) 2. Received and ordered filed the Investment Report for July 31, 1995. (F: 12.5) 3. Ratified Warrant List for August 31, 1995.(F:12.3) 5. Approved Change Order No. 7 for the Lakeshore Drive Bridge Reconstruction Project, in the amount of $29,879.20 and dir_ected Staff to invoice E.V.M.W.D. for the improvements they have requested to their water and sewer lines in the amount of $17,058.15.(F:156.2) ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR 4. Resianation from Redevelopment Aaencv Board - Boardmember Alonai. (F:134.1) Vice Chairman Bender indicated that he pulled this item to clarify the earlier comments by Mr. Alongi with regard to Mrs. Cherveny. He clarified that the existing Council was not the body who took action to remove Mrs. Cherveny as the RDA Chair. PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINIITES - SEPTEMBER 12~ 1995 MOVED BY BENDER, SECONDED BY BRINLEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ACCEPT THE RESIGNATION OF BOARDMEMBER ALONGI. PUBLIC HEARING 6. 34.10) The Clerk of the Board reported no written comments or protests. Chairman Pape opened the public hearing at 7:28 p.m. asking those persons interested in this item to speak. The following people spoke: Leonard O'Byrne, representing Camelot Properties explained this request which postpones the finish date to next year. Chris Hyland, 15191 Wavecrest Drive, questioned whether Mr. O'Byrne had received the financial assistance for Phase II already. Mr. O'Byrne indicated he has not. Mrs. Hyland continued by asking why the property taxes have not been paid, noting that the City is paying on this project. George Alongi, 649 Mill Street, requested that the Agency hold back on the $700,000 in assistance until the eight screen theater becomes successful. He quoted a letter from Camelot Properties in which they request the opportunity to review the success and reevaluate the expansion plans. He stressed that the payments should be held up until the terms agreed upon in the M.O.U. are fulfilled. Mr. O'Byrne indicated that no taxes are due on the property. He indicated that the property being discussed was acquired for right-of-way at a savings of about $60,000 to the Agency. He indicated that the right-of-way now needs to be deeded back to the County and is more of a houskeeping item. He noted that when the taxes were delinquent, he was in the process of an appeal to the County; the appeal was successful and he received a$57,000 adjuustment. He stressed that the payment on those taxes was made immediately after the appeal was addressed. He clarified that the property accross the street is ready to transfer and that he did not receive the $700,000. He stressed that this amount was only a guarantee. He indicated that they had hoped for a better business climate, however based on the present trends Mr. Krikorian chose to wait and see how the summer statistics turn out. He indicated that a final' decision will be made in 1996. He stressed that the only parties hurt by the delay are he and his wife. Hearing no further requests to speak, the public hearing was closed at 7:38 p.m. Vice Chairman Bender noted that he had received the clarification of his question with regard to the time table to coincide with Phase II. He concurred with the difficulty in pursuing business development at the present time. He Executive Director Molendyk explained this request for an extension of time and other considerations on the Disposition and Development Agreement. PAGE THREE - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 12, 1995 indicated that he did not see the request as problematic or lengthy and he was not concerned about the delays. Chairman Pape noted some old notes he retained on this topic; and indicated that Mr. Alongi had indicated that he felt the theater was a low priority for the Community. He indicated that based on those comments, he was not surprised by Mr. Alongi's comments this evening. He stressed the impact of the economic times on the business seen by the theater. MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY BENDER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF TH03E PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-8 EXTENDING THE TIME LIMIT FOR COMPLETION OF PHASE II CAMELOT CENTERS TO DECEMBER 31~ 1996~ AND REVIEW OF THE POS5IBLE CHANGES TO THE COMMERCIAL FACILITY. RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-8 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPROVED BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD ON MARCH 25, 1993, AND AMENDED NOVEMBER 8~ 1994, RESOLUTION NO. RDA 94-9 RELATING THERETO. PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS None. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS None. BOARDMEMBER COMMENTS None. CLOSED 3ESSION None. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY WASHBURN, SECONDED BY BRINLEY AND CARRIEDwBY UNANIMOU3 VOTE OF TH03E PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AT 7:41 P.M. / W. PG PE C~ HAIRMAN :LOPMENT AGENCY a.~r s~: ~,~.~../~~~ ?ICRI RASAD~ ^~LERR OF THE BOARD REDEVELOPMENT A~ENCY MINtTTES REGIILAR REDEVSLOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LARE ELSINORB 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA September 26, 1995 ie+kir+k*+kfkie***lkfrieife~ir***ik*fklkik+F+F+kR#rikikik*lkik*****lkikikikiklkltlkir~k*ikkiklklkie~t****tr#r CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 9:25 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: BENDER~ BRINLEY~ PAPE ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: WASHBIIRN~ VACANT Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Assistant Executive Director Watenpaugh, Legal Counsel Harper, Community Development Director Leslie, Community Services Director Sapp, Public Services Director Tecca, Special Projects Coordinator Wood and Clerk of the Board Kasad. PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS None Requested. CON3ENT CALENDAR The following item was pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion and consideration: Item No. 5. MOVED BY BRINLEY~ SECONDED BY BENDER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMO VOTE OF TAOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: (F:134.3) a. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - September 26, 1995. 2. Ratified Warrant List for September 15, 1995. (F:12.3) 3. Accepted Notice of Completion for the Lakeshore Drive Detour Road from Kunze, Incorporated, and authorized recordation. (F:156.2) 4. Adopted Resolution No. RDA 95-9 relating to Bond Refinancing - Series A Subordinate Tax Allocation Revenue Notes. (F:126.5) RESOLIITZON NO. RDA 95-9 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LARE ELSINORE~ AOTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE E%ECUTION OF HOUSING FUND LOAN AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF CERTAIN BONDS BY THELARE ELSINORE PIIBLIC FINANCING AIITHORITY~ APPROVING OFFICIAL STATEMENT RELATING TO SUCH BONDSo CONFIRMING CERTAIN FINDINGS OF BENEFIT AND AUTHORI2ING AND APPROVING OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. 6. Concurred with City Council Action to Deny a Request to Initiate a General Plan Amendment Changing the Land Use PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 260 1995 Designation of Property located at the Intersection of Graham Avenue and Lakeshore Drive from Mediwn High Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. (F:83o2) ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 5. Resolution No. RDA 95-10 relatina to Establishment of Mortaaae Assistance Proaram for West Coast Homes. (F:87.2) Chairman Pape indicated that he pulled this item to provide information to the public. He explained that this is the third such program considered by the Agency. He further explained that it provides the opportunity to purchase homes with assistance. He advised that the first such program initiated by Osborne Development has had seven homes close escrow. He noted that at least two others are looking at participation in the program< MOVED BY PAPE' SECONDED BY BENDER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTZON NO. 95-108 RESOLIITION NO. RDA 95-10 A RESOLIITION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CZTY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING A CERTAIN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR TAE CITY OF LARE ELSINORE AND WEST COAST HOMES IN ACCORDANCE WITH A CERTAIN MORTGAGE ~SSISTANCE PROGRAM. PIIBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS None. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS None. BOARDMEMBER COMMENTS None, THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WA~ RECESSED A2° 9:38 P.M, THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETYNG RECONVENED AT Y0:09 P.M. CLOSED SESSIOId a. Pending Litigation - Lake Elsinore Associates vs. Redevelopment Agency/City Council - Case #2007670 b. Pending Litigation - Ervin S. & Ca rol E. Palmer vs, Redevelopment Agency/City, etc. - Case #267394. c, Eending Litigation - Redevelopment Agnecy vs. Sportsman's Lodge - Case #257164. d. Pending Litigation - Redevelopment Agency vs. REWS, Inc. - Case #247782e THE REGIILAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETYNG AA~ ADJOIIRNED TO A JOINT CLOSED SESS%ON WIT$ THE CITY COIINCIL AT 10:10 P.M. TO DISCUSS THE ABOVE MENTIONED MATTERS. PAGE THREE - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINQTES - SEPTEMBER 26~ 1995 THE REGIILAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECONVENED AT 11:05 P.M. NO ACTION TAREN. ADJOIIRNMENT MOVED BY PAPE~ SECONDED BY BENDER AND CARRZED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOIIRN THE REGULAT~i REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING AT 11:06 P.M. ~ / ~ I Gt~ ~~ EVIN W. P PE, CHAIRMAN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AT ESTC ~ VICRI RASAD~ CLERR O THE BOARD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES REGIILAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LARE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA October 10, 1995 *rr***,k,k,ksra**,k,k,k***tttr**rtrrtttttt**tttttt*****s*tr********,k******,k**,ks CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 8:51 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: BENDER~ BRINLEY~ WASHBIIRN~ PAPE ABSENT: . VACANT Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Watenpaugh, Legal Counsel Harper, Administrative Services Director Boone, Community Development Director Leslie, Community Services Director Sapp, Public Services Director Tecca and Clerk of the Board Kasad. PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS None requested. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED SY WASHBORN~ SECONDED BY BRINLEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: a. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - September 26, 1995. (F:134.3) 2. Received and ordered filed the Investment Report for August 31, 1995. (F:12.5) 3. Ratified Warrant List for September 29, 1995. (F:12.3) 4. Accepted Change Order Nos. 3 and 4 for the Lakeshore Drive Bridge Reconstruction Project. (F:156.2) 5. Adopted Resolution No. RDA 95-11 Approving Establishment of Mortgaqe Assistance Program for Inco Homes. (F:87.2) RESOLOTION NO. RDA 95-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LARE ELSINORE APPROVING A CERTAIN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF LARE ELSINORE AND INCO HOMES IN ACCORDANCE WITH A CERTAIN MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. 6. Approved Cancellation of the October 24th Redevelopment Agency Meeting. (F:134.1) POBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS None. PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT ~GENCY MINIITES - OCTOBER l0e 1995 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS None. BOARDMEMBER COMMEN°1'S None. CLOSED SESSYON a. Lake Elsinore Associates vs. Redevelopment Agency/City Council - Case #z00767. b. Ervin S. & Carol E. Palmer vs. Redevelopment Agency/City, etc. - Case #z67394a LEGAL COUNSEL HARPER ADVISED THAT THERE WAS NO NEED FOR DYSCII3SY02~T OF THESE MATTERS AT THYS TYME~ DUE TO THE LACR OF NEW YNFORMATIONe THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WA3 ADJOURNED AT 8:53 P.M. / A EST: ~ t ~~ ~ ~-C~1 VIC~R% RA ADa CLERR OF THE BOARD REDEVELOPMENT RGENCY CHAIRMAN AGENCY MINOTES REGIILAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LARB BLSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LARB ELSINORB~ CALIFORNIA November 14, 1995 rr***a***rrr*as**s~***,t~ra**r***s*,-*****e,e***ss******+~rt*+~*rr,ta*** ' CALL TO ORDER i The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 8:50 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMSERSS ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: BRINLEY~ PAPE, NASHBIIRN BENDER~ VACANT Also present were: Esecutive Director MoleaByk, Assistant City Manaqer Watenpauqh, Leqal Counsel Harper, Community Development Director Leslie, Community 8ervices Director Sapp, Public services Director Tecca, Special Projects Coordinator Wood and Clerk of the Board Rasad. POHLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS None Requested. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY BRINLEY~ SECONDED BY WASHSIIRN AND CARRIED BY ONANIMOIIS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were approved: (F:134.3) a. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - October 10, 1995. 2. Received and ordered filed the Investment Report for September 30, 1995. (F:12.5) 3. Ratified the following Warrant Lists: (F:12.3) a. October 16, 1995 b. October 31, 1995 4. Adopted Resolution No. RDA 95-12 approving the Mortgage Assistance Program for 888 Development. (F:87.2) RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-12 A RESOLIITION OF TH8 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THS CITY OF LARE ELSINORL+~ APPROVING A CBRTAIN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT SY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMSNT AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF LARS ELISNORB AND 888 DBVELOPMENT COMPANY IN ACCORDANCE WITH A CERTAZN MORTGA(iE A88ISTANCB PROGRAM. 5. Adopted Resolution No. RDA 95-13 approving the Low and Moderate Income Housing 20$ Set-Aside for Fiscal Year 1994- 95. (F:134.1) RESOLIITION NO. RDA 95-13 A RESOLIITION OF THB REDEVBLOPMSNT AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF LARS ELSINORE~ FINDIN(i AND DECLARING THAT THE REQIIIREMENTS FOR LOW OR MODERATB INCOME HOIISINd, IN ALL PROJECT AREAS AR& BEING MET. PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINtJTEB - NOVEMBER 14, 1995 6. Approved Change Order No. 8 for the Lakeshore Drive Bridge Reconstruction. (F:156.2) 7. Concurred with Council Action to Approve Commercial Project No. 95-4 -"Denny's Restaurant at the Lake Elsinore City Center". (F:58.2) s. Concurred with Council Action to take a Position of opposition regarding the Cleveland Ridge Community of Interest Application. (F:154.1) PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS None. EXECIITIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS None. • BOARDMEMBER COMMENTS None. CLOSED SESSION None. THE REGIILAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MSETSNG WAS ADJOIIRNED AT 8:51 P.M. a TEST: 4 VI S, CLER OF THE BOARD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~ W. PA , CHAIRMAN ~OPMENT AGENCY MINDTES REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CITY OF LARE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LARE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA November 28, 1995 **sas********ss*,t*********r**********#+t+t****,k*,r****************** CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order by Chairman Pape at 7:44 p.m, ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: BRINLEYe WABHBURN~ PAPE ABSENT: BOARDMEMSERS: BENDER, VACANT Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Assistan*_ City Manager Watenpaugh, Legal Counsel Harper, Community Deve]_opment Director Leslie, Community Services Director Sapp, Pub7:ic Services Director Tecca and Clerk of the Board Kasad: PQBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDI2ED ITEMS None requested. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY BRINLEY~ SECONDED SY WASHBORN AND CARRYED BY UNANIMOIIS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED> 1. The following Minutes were approved: a. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - November 14, 1995. (F:134.3) 2. Received and ordered filed the Investment Report for October 31, 1995. (f:12.5) 3. Ratified Warrant List for November 15, 1995. (F:12.3) PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEM~ None, EXECUTIVE DYRECTOR COMMENTS None. Nonee THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT' AGENCY MEET%NG WAS RECESSED AT 7:45 P.Me THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WA3 RECONVENED AT 8Y15 PoMo CLOSED SESSION ao I,ake Elsinore Associates vs. City of Lalce Elsinore/ Redevelopment Agency. PAGE TWO - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - NOVEMBER 28~ 1995 THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WAS ADJOIIRNED TO A JOINT CLOSED SESSION WITH THE CITY COUNCIL TO DISCOSS THE ABOVE MENTIONED LITIGATION AT 8:15 P.M. THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING WAS RECONVENED AT 8:51 P.M. NO ACTION TAREN. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY WASHBIIRN~ SECONDED BY PAPE A1~CARRIED BY ONANIMOUS VOTE OF TAOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGIIrfer~ RF~EVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING AT 8:52 P.M. „ T %~ ~v( ~~ ~~~~ EVIN W. P]yPE~ CHAIRMAN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~1 :EbT.>, l_ /~~~`-~ ~7'~CRI KA:"rS I:,: CLERR OF THE BOARD FtE~EVET~OPN!F~^_' T..GENCY MYNUTES AEGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGNECY MEETING CITY OF LARS SLSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET _ LARE ELSINORS~ CALIFORNIA TiTEBDAY~ DBCEMBER 12y 1995 ****r********r***s***********r**r*******s*s******s******s***• CALL TO ORDER The Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting was called to order by Chairwoman Brinley at 10:05 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERB: ALONGI~ RELLEY~ METZE~ PAPE~ BRINLBY ABSENT: BAORDMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Assistant City Manager Watenpaugh, Legal Counsel Harper, Administrative Services Director Boone, Community Development Director Leslie, Community Services Director Sapp, Public Services Director Tecca, Special Projects Coordinator Wood and Clerk of the Board Kasad. PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS None Requested. CONSENT CALENDAR The followinq Item was pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion and consideratione Item No. l.a. MOVED BY MET2E~ SECONDED BY PAPE AND CARRIED BY IINANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALBNDAR AS PRESENTSD. 2. itatified Warrant List for November 30, 1995. (F:12.3) 3. Adopted Resolution No. RDA 95-15 regarding Establishment of Mortgage Assistance Program - Centex Homes. (F:87.2) RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-15 A RESOLIITION OF T$8 RED&VBLOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LARE ELSINORE APPROVING A CERTAIN OWNER PARTICIPATZON AGREEMENT BY AND SETWEEN THE REDSVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LARE ELSINORE AND CENTE% HOMEB IN ACCORDANCE WITH A CERTAIN MORTGAGE A88ISTANCE PROGRAM. 4. Adopted Resolution No. RDA 95-14 regarding Bond Refinancing - Series A & Series B. (F:126.5) RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF PROJECT AREA L~AN AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF CERTAIN BONDS BY THE LAKE ELSINORE PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITYo APPROVING OFFYCIAL STATEMENT RELATING TO SUCH BONDS AND AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING `tHERETO. PAGE TWO - REDBVBLOPMENT AGENCY MINQTES - DECEMBER 12~ 1995 ITEM POLLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes a. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting - November 2s, 1995. (F:134.3) Boardraembers Alongi, Kelley and Metze indicated that they would be abstaining from vote on this item, because they were not in attendance at the November 28th meetinge Legal Counsel Harper clarified that this action would only be to accept the minutes and the three abstentions would not constitute a problem. MOVED SY BRINLBY~ SECONDED BY PAPE AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 2 AYES AND 3 ABSTENTIONS TO ACCEPT THE MINIITES AS PRESENTED. PIIBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDI2ED ITEMS None Requested. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTB No Comments, BOARDMEMBER COMMENT~ No Comments. THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY I+IEETING WAS RECESSED AT 10:06 P.M. THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETZNG RECONVENED AT 1OS25 P.M. CLOSED SESSION a. Lake Elsinore Associates vs. City/Redevelopment Agency - Case #200767. THE ItEDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WAS ADJOURNED TO A JOINT CLOSED SESSION WITH THE CITY COUNCIL AT 50:25 P.M. TO DISCUSS THE ABOVB LISTED MATTER. THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECONVENED AT 10944 P.Mo NO ACTIOId 'SARE1Jo MOVED BY PAPE, SECONDED BY RELLEY AND CARRIED BY ONANYMOUS VOTE TO ADJOURN THB REGIILAR REDSVELOPMENT AGENCY MESTING AT 10:44 P.M. ~ EAMELA BRINLE ~ HAIRWi~~ %tEDEVELOPME AGENCY ~ AT ST: ~.~~ /~,~~~"~~ ~ VICRI RASADo CLERR OF THE BOARD ItEDEVELOPMENT AGENCY