HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Reso No 1991
RESOLUTION NO. 91-1
-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
91-1 FOR THE AMENDMENT OF ALBERHILL SPECIFIC
PLAN LAND USE EXHIBIT 11-2; BOUNDED BY
INTERSTATE 15, TERRA COTTA ROAD/NICHOLS,
PACIFIC CLAY AND ROBB/LAKE STREET; FILED BY
BRIGHTON HOMES
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake
Elsinore by Brighton Homes to amend the City of Lake Elsinore
General Plan to revise the land uses specified within Exhibit 11-2
of the Land Use Element relating to the Alberhill Specific Plan
area consisting of approximately 997 acres of land bounded
generally by Interstate 15 to the north, Terra Cotta Road/Nichols
Road to the south, Pacific Clay Company to the east, and Robb
Road/Lake Street to the west;
WHEREAS public notice of said applications has been given, and
the Planning commission has considered evidence presented by the
applicant, community Development Department and other interested
parties at a public hearing held with respect to this application
on June 5, 1991, and June 19, 1991;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the city of Lake
Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
-
SECTION 1. The Planning commission has considered the
previously certified Environmental Impact Report 89-2, the Addendum
to Environmental Impact Report (EIR) 89-2, the proposed General
Plan Amendment 91-1, prior to making a decision to recommend that
the City Council approve the proposed amendment to the 1990 City of
Lake Elsinore General Plan The Planning commission finds and
determines that EIR 89-2 and the Addendum thereto are adequate
under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to analyze the
environmental effects of General Plan Amendment 91-1, and
recommends City Council approval, based upon the following findings
and determinations:
a. Only minor technical changes and additions are
necessary to make the FEIR 89-2 adequate to
address the proposed General Plan Amendment,
since substantial changes have not occurred
with respect to the circumstances under which
the existing General Plan was undertaken, the
proposed changes to the General Plan will not
require any important revision to FEIR 89-2,
and there will be no new significant environ-
mental impacts that were not considered in the
FEIR;
-
b.
No mitigation measures or alternatives which
were previously not considered in the FEIR 89-
2 would substantially lessen any significant
effects on the environment;
c. The changes to EIR 89-2 set forth in the
Addendum thereto do not raise important new
issues about any significant effects on the
environment.
d. No new information of substantial importance
to the proposed General Plan project has
become available.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning
law and the City of Lake Elsinore the following finding for the
approval of General Plan Amendment 91-1 have been made as follows:
1. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use
and allow density more in keeping with the subject property's
location, access and site characteristics.
The proposed amendment will not significantly
alter the land uses, intensity, of the General
Plan.
The General Plan Land Use Element currently
provides an illustration of the precise land
uses approved for the project site, through
the adopted Alberhill specific plan. The
illustrative indicates that the specific plan
area will contain residential, commercial,
institutional and open space land uses. The
proposed amendment will maintain the same land
uses in revised locations consistent with the
proposed Specific Plan.
.....
2. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the
surrounding land use designations.
The proposed general plan amendment, which
proposes to allow the development of
residential, commercial, institutional, and
open space is consistent with and similar to
the surrounding residential and specific plan
areas designated by the general plan. The
proposed specific plan proposes no hand uses
adverse to the project site or surrounding
land uses.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning
commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that .....
the city Council of the city of Lake Elsinore approve General Plan
Amendment 91-1, amending of Exhibit 11-2 within the City of Lake
Elsinore General Plan, (See Exhibit 1).
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on June 19, 1991, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Gilenson, Brinley, Wilsey and
Saathoff
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
ABSTAIN: Commissioners: None
.....,
_l~
Kevin Shear, Secretary to the Lake
Elsinore Planning Commission
II
~
I' _ .
<-.~
... .....
~
'-
t>
~e;:
..q
'.E::
.......
.......
.
.
i
ili! I
i
II
J '1
.'1 . !I
if . IE f ill Ii (fl'
(I Jill III
.........................ldl HI d I
11 I !1. II. It
. f Uti I II Ii If
I I I.. i
tIll Ir Ill;
!~PHtp
· It f ! ! rl
! J~ ~ I H~
i IIi f r tg
I I rft
· r &
11 (IIi"
1 fin
II · lr.
tt Illi
1 J I J 11
Ii !f OOl!! ~~ BOO~OOOO~[;] 0000 00 ~ I
ei Iii J f I II,i ! 1'1 f I J IIII i
I- I I, , i I . 1 f
i! f' f II . .11111
n ~ gi S l I. ..
j: Q II
i~ e.1 IB;HH81I.tlll~iBII
. ih .. ~ !ctt:CI
~ ~~ttt-c
II fI II PI II
~ I I.\! 'I
.
-=
~
IF;
I~
It
... .
o
Ul
~
EXHIBIT 1.
limB I H {
leffill
[i I J H
1 dU
i 1(11
I !!
i ;: Q
f ! t f
i I J
~JI
.. - i
! i ~
II ~ jP
t jP J
! ~ .
f r
'i
~ !!!
~-t
-
..
C
en
CD
'1J
-
~
,"
RESOLUTION NO. 91-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF '!HE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE APPROVAL OF BRIGHTON SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT #1 FOR THE AMENDMENT OF ALBERHILL
SPECIFIC PLAN 89-2; BOUNDED BY INTERSTATE 15,
TERRA COTTA ROAD/NICHOLS, PACIFIC CLAY AND
ROBB/LAKE STREET; FILED BY BRIGHTON HOMES
-
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake
Elsinore by Brighton Homes to amend the Alberhill Specific Plan
89-2 to redesignate the land uses within a portion of the Alberhill
Ranch Specific Plan area, consisting of approximately 997 acres of
land bounded generally by Interstate 15 to the north, Terra Cotta
Road/Nichols Road to the south, Pacific Clay Company to the east,
and Robb Road/Lake Street to the west;
WHEREAS public notice of said applications has been given, and
the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the
applicant, Community Development Department, and other interested
parties at a public hearing held with respect to this application
on June 5, 1991, and June 19,1991;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning commission of the city of Lake
Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
-
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the
previously certified Environmental Impact Report 89-2, the Addendum
to EIR 89-2, the proposed Brighton Specific Plan Amendment #1,
prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council
approve the proposed Amendment to Specific Plan 89-2. The Planning
commission finds and determines that EIR 89-2 and the Addendum
thereto are adequate under CEQA to analyze the environmental
effects of Brighton Specific Plan Amendment #1, and recommends city
Council approval, based upon the following findings and
determinations:
a. Only minor technical changes and addi tions are
necessary to make EIR 89-2 adequate to address the
proposed Specific Plan Amendment #1 since
substantial changes have not occurred with respect
to the circumstances under which the existing
Specific Plan was undertaken, these proposed
changes to the Specific Plan will not require any
important revisions to FEIR 89-2 and there will be
no new significant environmental impacts that were
not considered in EIR 89-2;
b. No mitigation measures or alternatives which were
previously not considered in EIR 89-2 would
substantially lessen any significant effects on the
environment;
-
c. The changes to EIR 89-2 set forth in the Addendum
there to do not raise important new issues about
any significant effects on the environment.
d. No new information of substantial importance
to the proposed Specific Plan project has
become available.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.99.100 of the
zoning Ordinance, the findings by the City of Lake Elsinore for
approval of Specific Plans have been made as follows:
1. The location and design of the proposed development shall be
consistent with the Goals and Policies of the City's General
Plan and with any other applicable plan or policies adopted by
the City, or in the process of being prepared and adopted.
The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the
Goals and Polices of the General Plan, since the
proposed project takes in to consideration the uses
permitted, surrounding land uses and existing and
proposed circulation system. Additionally a
concurrent General Plan Amendment is being
processed to ensure consistency in land uses and
policies is maintained.
2.
The proposed location shall allow the development to be well-
integrated with or adequately buffered from its surroundings,
whichever may be the case.
~
The proposed location is well integrated and
located to its surroundings since, the proposed
project will be adjacent to similar residential,
commercial, institutional, and open space uses
which have already received specific plan approval.
Moreover, the proposed proj ect ' s land use plan
proposes to use an 18 hole golf course to buffer
the residential uses from the adjacent I-IS
freeway.
3. All vehicular traffic generated by the development, either in
phased increments or at full build-out, is to be accommodated
safely and without causing undue congestion upon adjoining
streets.
A traffic study has been completed, which addresses
all of the anticipated circulation system improve-
ments necessary to adequately handle the project's
expected traffic volumes. There will be no
significant congestion during build-out or at
completion of the project.
4. The Final Specific Plan shall identify a methodology(s) to
allow land uses to be adequately serviced by existing or
proposed pUblic facilities and services. In appropriate
circumstances, and as provided elsewhere by City Code, the
city may require that suitable areas be reserved for schools,
parks and pedestrian ways; or pUblic open spaces shall be
dedicated or reserved by private covenant for the common use
of residents, establishments or operations in the development.
~
The proposed proj ect provides a phasing schedule
for the development of adequate public facilities
on an as needed basis tied to the build out of
project phases. Additionally, the proposed project
will provide sites for the development of parks,
open space areas, and schools.
5. The overall design of the Specific Plan will produce an
attractive, efficient and stable development.
The proposed Specific Plan contains design
guidelines for the long term development of the
project such as a phasing schedule of the overall
project, logical location of land uses, and
necessary circulation improvements to facilitate
production of an attractive, efficient and stable
development of the project.
~
6. In accordance with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), impacts have been reduced to
a level of non-significance, or in the case where impacts
remain, a statement of overriding considerations must be
adopted to justify the merits of project implementation.
An Addendum Environmental Impact Report to the
;~,;,.
\"~
Alberhill FEIR 89-2 has been prepared to address the
minor technical revisions associated with the proposed
project. The Alberhill FEIR addressed all the significant
impacts and developed mitigation measures reducing
impacts to a level of insignificance. A statement of
overriding considerations was adopted for impacts not
reduced to a level of insignificance.
-
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning
Commission of the city of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that
the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approve Specific Plan
Amendment #1, amending Specific Plan 89-2.
1) All errata sheets, typographical errors and other corrections
shall be incorporated within thirty (30) days following City
Council approval. Twenty (20) copies of the corrected
document shall be delivered to the city by the end of the
thirty (30) day period. The final document shall note on its
cover that it is the Specific Plan as approved by the City
Council with all corrections having been incorporated.
2) The applicant shall comply with all applicable standards of
the water purveyor with respect to the distribution and use of
reclaimed water.
3) Prior to the issuance of any building permits all City and
County Fire Department standards shall be satisfied.
-
4) Prior to final map approval, Applicant shall post performance
bonds and labor and material bonds in an amount equal to the
engineer's cost estimate for all public improvements shown or
conditioned on the tentative tract map if said improvement
plans have been approved by the City Engineer or an amount
equal to 125% of the engineer's cost estimate if improvement
plans have not been approved by the City Engineer.
5) Prior to the opening of any model home complex, the applicant
shall provide to the City a completed turn key 5 acre park and
10 acre hydroseeded elementary school site in accordance with
the approved Development Agreement; Ord. 890.
6) Prior to the approval of the first tentative map, applicant
shall have entered into a school impact mitigation agreement
with the school district. city shall have considered the
adequacy of the school facilities or available means of
financing school facilities to meet the needs and demand of
new development proposed in such tentative map to be approved
by the City.
7) When submi tting tentative or vesting tentative tract maps they
shall include information showing the proposed drainage system
along with supporting hydrology studies for review and
approval by the City Engineer.
-
8) Prior to or concurrent with the submittal of any tentative or
vesting tentative tract maps, the applicant shall submit to
the City Engineer and Director of Community Development
acoustic studies prepared pursuant to City standards showing
that the development will be sound attenuated against present
and projected noise levels to meet the City's interior noise
standards. The final acoustical analysis shall calculate the
impact exposure levels and specify mitigation measures
necessary to bring the proj ect into conformance with City
noise standards and policies in effect at the time of project
review. The final acoustical analysis shall be prepared by an
expert in the field of acoustics.
9) Concurrent with the submission of the first tentative or
vesting tentative map, the applicant shall submit, for review
and approval by the Director of Community Development and City
Engineer and subsequent approval by the Planning Commission,
a circulation phasing plan for the entire project, providing
the phasing of the street improvements and the appropriate
supporting traffic studies. The traffic studies shall address
the cumulative impacts of recent nearby development as well as
the project's impacts on the overall circulation system.
10) Concurrent with the review of all tentative maps, the City of
Lake Elsinore Community Services Director shall review and
ensure that all required trails and bike ways approved within
the Brighton Specific Plan are adequately reflected on the
tentative maps prior to approval.
Developer shall incorporate all applicable design
described in the specific plan and any other
subsequently approved into the design of all
tentative maps submitted.
12) Developer shall comply with all applicable EIR mitigation
measures as identified in the Alberhill FEIR 89-2 and Addendum
EIR,( see Exhibit 1).
11)
guidelines
guidelines
individual
........
13) Concurrent with the submittal of the first tentative map, a
phasing plan for removal of all mining operations and stock
pile operations shall be submitted, for review and approval by
the Community Development Director. Mining may continue
within the Alberhill Specific Plan area for a period not to
exceed four (4) years from the date of Specific Plan approval
in accordance with the City of Lake Elsinore mining
regulations.
14) Developer shall participate in the City of Lake Elsinore city
wide Landscaping and Street Lighting District pursuant to
Resolution No. 88-27 or similar lighting and maintenance
district if approved by City Council.
15) All landscaped slopes adjacent to public right of way, over 5
feet in vertical height, not a part of and not adjacent to
Lake Street, Nichols Road, Collector A, Collector B, or other
collectors wi thin the proj ect, shall be maintained by a ........
homeowners association or property owner.
16) Prior to the submittal of any application for Design Review,
the applicant shall submit to the Director of Community
Development, and receive approval from the Planning
Commission, Precise Architectural Design Guidelines
(Architecture and Landscaping) for the Brighton Specific Plan
Area. These Design Guidelines shall create a central
architectural theme for the area and describe how this theme
will be carried out in terms of landscaping, architecture,
entry monuments, walls and other hardscape features. The
Design Guidelines shall apply to all development. The Design
Guidelines shall be consistent with the general guidelines
discussed in the specific plan. The applicant shall
incorporate these design guidelines into the CC&R's for the
project.
17) Prior to the issuance of any final map, a master landscape and
streetscape plan, including medians, shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Commission. The fOllowing landscape
and streetscape design considerations shall be incorporated
into the plans:
* Screening parking areas by berms or landscaping
........
* Establish a theme palette for the Lake street, Nichols
Road, "A" and "B" Streets.
* Public transit stops shall be considered in order to
establish appropriate location points.
* Drought-resistant vegetation shall be used in landscaping
whenever possible to reduce the demand for irrigation
water.
* Identification of responsibility for the maintenance of
all landscaping improvements within the public right of
way.
* All street intersections shall be designed to meet
traffic safety standards pertaining to line of sight
setback of walls, trees, and other landscape features to
the satisfaction of the city Engineer.
*
Ownership and identification of responsibility for the
maintenance of all open space within the project
including natural areas and slopes.
-
18) The applicant shall reserve a minimum of 5% of the total units
developed for low and moderate income housing units, as
defined by the County of Riverside median income levels in
effect at the time the units are required, in accordance with
the timing specified in the approved development agreement.
The low and moderate income units shall be developed in any
mUlti-family residential project developed in the high density
mUlti-family districts that exceeds 24 dwelling units per
acre.
19) Prior to the issuance of any building permits for residential
or commercial land uses the applicant shall submit to the
Planning Commission for review and approval a Master Sign
Program for all on-site signs, which shall include but not be
limited to commercial identification signs, on-site
residential and commercial directional signs, and proj ect area
convenience signs. The sign program shall provide text and
exhibits in a bound format containing all relevant sign
criteria including but not limited to Sign construction
material, colors, height, letter style,
-
20) Prior to the submittal of applications for any commercial
design review, the applicant shall submit a Transportation
Management Plan (TMP) to the Director of Community Development
for review and approval by the Planning Commission. The plan
shall address the following measures , taking into
consideration the nature, type and use of the commercial
development being proposed;
a. Establishment of flex-time schedules for employees and/or
shifting work schedules to avoid peak hour traffic
b. Use of employee car or vanpools
c. Establishment of preferential and free parking for car
and vanpoolers
d. Establishment of ridesharing programs
e. provision of subsidies for transit passes
f. Creation of locker room facilities for employees
g. Attain a goal of a 25% reduction in on-site trips
21) All habitat resources planned for removal, preservation,
creation, or enhancement are subject to the review and permit
issuance of the U. S Army Corps of Engineers pursuant to
section 404 of the Clean Water Act, U.S. Fish and wildlife
Service and sections 1601-1603 of the State Department of Fish
and Game. Copies of all permits (404 and 1603) and conditions
attached to the permits shall be submitted to the Director of
_ Communi ty Development review prior to the removal of any
habitat.
22) Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any
residential unit exceeding 2,235, the applicant shall
construct and complete according to approved plans, an 18 hole
golf course. The golf course shall become operational and open
for public use within 180 days of the completion of
construction, unless an extension is granted by the City
Council.
23) The developer shall have on file with the City at all times a
golf course routing plan. No tentative or vesting tract map
shall be submitted or subsequently approved that is in
conflict or inconsistent with the golf course routing plan on
file with the City unless accompanied by a new golf course
routing plan that shows there is no conflict with the proposed
tentative or vesting tract map.
24) Developer shall comply with the city's approved landscaping
standards in effect at the time of approval of this Specific
Plan with respect to the landscaping in medians, parkways,
expanded parkways and adjacent slopes to be maintained by the
ci ty or Landscaping Maintenance District. Landscaping and
irrigation plans shall be approved by the Public Works Manager
and City's Landscape Architect.
25) Concurrent with the submission of the first tentative map, the
applicant shall submit a phasing plan for the entire project
that shows the location and order in which the residential
units are to be constructed, along with the phasing of the
infrastructure including the streets, schools and parks
necessary to support the residential development being
constructed. Phasing of the Suburban Village districts may be
combined or done separately.
.....,
26) The minimum lot size for single family detached residential
unit shall be 6,000 square feet with the exception that 800
S.F.D. lots may be less than 6,000 square feet and the further
exception that 400 lots of the 800 lots may be less than 5,000
square feet. No S.F.D. lot shall be less than 4,200 square
feet.
27) All structures shall be designed to incorporate all state and
local water conservation regulations, subject to the approval
of the Director of Community Development.
28) No residential development shall front onto collector streets.
29) Roadway standards for Lake Elsinore relating to the minimum
local street radii, maximum cul-de-sac length, maximum grade
and minimum sidewalk width must be followed.
.....,
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on June 19, 1991, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
commissioners: Brinley, Wilsey and Saathoff
NOES:
Commissioners: Gilenson
ABSENT:
commissioners: None
ABSTAIN:
commissioners:
commission
J~ ~~ecretary
Lake Elsinore Planning
to the
Commission
-
RESOLUTION NO. 91-3
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF '!HE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE APPROVAL OF THE ZONING REGULATIONS
FOR THE BRIGHTON/ALBERHILL SPECIFIC PLAN 89-2;
BOUNDED BY INTERSTATE 15, TERRA COTTA
ROAD/NICHOLS, PACIFIC CLAY AND ROBB/LAKE
STREET; FILED BY BRIGHTON HOMES
-
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake
Elsinore by Brighton Homes to amend the Brighton/Alberhill
Development Agreement relating to the Alberhill Specific Plan area
consisting of approximately 997 acres of land bounded generally by
Interstate 15 to the north, Terra Cotta Road/Nichols Road to the
south, Pacific Clay Company to the east, and Robb Road/Lake Street
to the west;
WHEREAS public notice of said applications has been given, and
the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the
applicant, Community Development Department and other interested
parties at a public hearing held with respect to this application
on June 5, 1991, and June 19, 1991;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake
Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
--
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the
previously certified Environmental Impact Report 89-2, the Addendum
to EIR 89-2, the proposed Brighton/Alberhill Zoning Regulations
prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council
approve the proposed Amendment to the Specific Plan 89-2. The
Planning Commission finds and determines that EIR 89-2 and the
Addendum thereto are adequate under CEQA to analyze the environ-
mental effects of the Zoning Regulations and recommends City
Council approval, based upon the following findings and
determinations:
a. Only minor technical changes and additions are
necessary to make the FEIR 89-2 adequate to
address the proposed Zoning Regulations, since
substantial changes have not occurred with
respect to the circumstances under which the
existing Specific Plan was undertaken, the
proposed changes to the Zoning Regulations
will not require any important revisions to
the FEIR 89-2, and there will be no new
significant environmental impacts that were
not considered in the FEIR;
b. No mitigation measures or alternatives which
were previously not considered in the FEIR 89-
2 would substantially lessen any significant
effects on the environment;
c.
The changes to EIR 89-2 set forth in the
Addendum thereto do not raise important new
issues about any significant effects on the
environment.
--
d. No new information of substantial importance
to the project has become available.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning
law and the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the
approval of the Zoning Regulations have been made as follows:
1. The proposed Zoning Regulations are consistent with the City
of Lake Elsinore General Plan.
1
The proposed Zoning Regulations are consistent
with the General Plan. The proposed amendment
does not propose any addition, deletion or
modification which will deviate from the Goals
and/or Polices of the General Plan.
2. The proposed Zoning Regulations are consistent wi th any
applicable specific plan, zoning policies and regulations.
The proposed Zoning Regulations are consistent
with the proposed Alberhill/Brighton Specific
Plan Amendment. The purpose of the Zoning
Regulation is to implement the provisions of
the revised Alberhill/Brighton Specific Plan.
......
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning
commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that
the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approve the Zoning
Regulations for the Brighton/Alberhill Specific Plan.
Except as so expressly amended by this amendment (Exhibit 1), all
of the terms, conditions and provisions of the agreement are hereby
ratified and confirmed, and shall remain in full force and effect.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning commission of the City of
Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on June 19, 1991, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
Commissioners: Brinley, Wilsey and Saathoff
NOES:
commissioners: Gilenson
ABSENT:
commissioners: None
ABSTAIN:
commissioners: None
....,
I
~~-~..
'. I
Bl1 a thoff, Chai~
Lake Elsinore Plannin
_~JL-
Kevin Shear, Secretary to the
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
-
2
II
~
...,L _ J ......
'-~
~
! '-
.
i ill
I I
.r- .
I
i
I i
il! I
~ ! II
.Y · Ii flnn'I'
1111 }I 111
..........................12 1111111 I
II I I.. fa. f
. d dill If
filII sqdl
t I it it n
IJIUUPt
· it f ! ~ r
II~! I fii
I i r (t~
I 1 f D
. r g f
'II I I f
I f I ~~
1i I Jl1
t t I li Ii
1 J I J 11
rnrnu I!! {
(Elliff
[i lIB
1 1111
i 1(11
I !!
i' $ Q
[ a t f
j i ~
Ii t J
t! _
... - i
D i $
l $ jP
J jP f
~ ~ i
r r
1>- # * 0000 ~~800~OOOO~OOOOOOOO~ I 'i
n II ~ 5!!
~e;: ~ I! ~ I-Il III f I Jill r I c.....
,,~ II II -
I pll.(l1I11 c: ..
.:=- .1 I' en
..~. CD
. ...... n~ i
~ ....... 'ill -0
.
IB;l!1l!181~.tll!1~iell -
-= & II ! ~
s:>> - i ~ ~
I~ d !c:t~C[
1> ttttt
.. 1111111111"
I~ ~ . it I I · ~ IJ
0
III
2
EXHIBIT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 91-4
-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF '!HE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE APPROVAL OF THE BRIGHTON/ALBERHILL
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT ADDING SECTION
30, FOR THE ALBERHILL SPECIFIC PLAN 89-2;
BOUNDED BY INTERSTATE 15, TERRA COTTA
ROAD/NICHOLS, PACIFIC CLAY AND ROBB/LAKE
STREET; FILED BY BRIGHTON HOMES
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake
Elsinore by Brighton Homes to amend the Brighton/Alberhill
Development Agreement relating to the Alberhill Specific Plan area
consisting of approximately 997 acres of land bounded generally by
Interstate 15 to the north, Terra Cotta Road/Nichols Road to the
south, Pacific Clay Company to the east, and Robb Road/Lake Street
to the west;
WHEREAS public notice of said applications has been given, and
the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the
applicant, Community Development Department and other interested
parties at a public hearing held with respect to this application
on June 5, 1991, and June 19, 1991;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning commission of the City of Lake
Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
-
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the
previously certified Environmental Impact Report 89-2, the Addendum
to EIR 89-2, the proposed Brighton/Alberhill Development Agreement
Amendment prior to making a decision to recommend that the City
Council approve the proposed Amendment to the Development
Agreement. The Planning Commission finds and determines that EIR
89-2 and the Addendum thereto are adequate under CEQA to analyze
the environmental effects of the Development Agreement and
recommends City Council approval, based upon the fOllowing findings
and determinations:
a. Only minor technical changes and additions are
necessary to make the FEIR 89-2 adequate to
address the proposed Development Agreement
Amendment, since substantial changes have not
occurred with respect to the circumstances
under which the existing Development Agreement
was undertaken, and there will be no new
significant environmental impacts that were
not considered in the FEIR;
b. No mitigation measures or alternatives which
were previously not considered in the FEIR 89-
2 would substantially lessen any significant
effects on the environment;
c.
The changes to EIR 89-2 set forth in the
Addendum thereto do not raise important new
issues about any significant effects on the
environment.
-
d. No new information of substantial importance
to the proposed Development Agreement has
become available.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with state Planning and Zoning
law and the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the
approval of Development Agreement have been made as follows:
1
1. The proposed Development Agreement Amendment is consistent
with the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan.
The proposed Development Agreement Amendment
is consistent with the General Plan. The
proposed amendment does not propose any
addition, deletion or modification which will
deviate from the Goals and/or Polices of the
General Plan.
2. The proposed Development Agreement is consistent with any
applicable specific plan, zoning policies and regulations.
The proposed Development Agreement is
consistent with the proposed
Alberhill/Brighton Specific Plan Amendment.
The purpose of the Development Agreement
Amendment is to implement the provisions of
the revised Alberhill/Brighton Specific Plan.
~
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning
Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that
the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approve amending the
Brighton/Alberhill Development Agreement adding section 30 (See
Attachment 1).
Except as so expressly amended by this amendment (Exhibit I), all
of the terms, conditions and provisions of the agreement are hereby
ratified and confirmed, and shall remain in full force and effect.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning commission of the City of
Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on June 19, 1991, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
commissioners: Brinley, Wilsey and Saathoff
.....
NOES:
commissioners: Gilenson
ABSENT:
commissioners: None
ABSTAIN:
commissioners: None
/,I
//
c ~^ /' /
/ /C:L- '
Saathoff, Chai
Lake Elsinore PI ann ,
l~_
Kevin Shear, Secretary to the
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
-
2
1.. sect:.ian 30 is ,M~ to the ~:..~tt, as fallc:Ml:
"30. AdODtion of ATherlrl.ll Scecific Plan A1ne1'mlli!!:lit No.1.
-
30.1 PennittM Uses of ~. Notwithstan:11rq sect.ial8
and ~ and all other prtWisians of the ~.~t speci.ty1D; t:ba
nature, intensity and locat.ian of allcwab1e land uses em t:ba
P.roperty, the permitted uses of the P.roperty, the density and
intensity of use, the 1Dl!l~'"'1'1'11 height, 1:ulk and 8ize of tha ~~
1:Juil~ an the property, the design ~ for such
c::cnst:ructian, eM previsions for rescvatian and dedicatic:a of land
for pJblic purposes and golf ccmse and related recreatianal uses,
are all as set forth in AJbethi.ll Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 and
are m:otperated herein by this reference. '1hey are the uses of t:ba
P.roperty covered by this Agreement Wich are specifically pemit::ted
by this Agreement and the City is J::lcun:1 to pemi.t these uses em t:ba
P.roperty. ~it "0" attacNd hereto and inc:c1'porated here1n by
tl:Us reference shews the interdel:! lard uses CCI'l1:eDplated by
Al1:lerhill Specific Plan Amen:mmt No. 1 and sec::um:l by this
~.
30.2 "Existina DevehJl.luerrt ~ls". '1ba cSef1nit.ian of t:ba
tam "Exi.st.i.1'v; oevelopnent Apprcvals, II as set forth in Secticn 2.10
of the Agreement, shall be d~ to include, in addit.icll to the
developnent approvals de.sc:ribed in such sect:.ian 2.10, the apprc:wal
of General Plan Atrlendment No. 91- _ and AJbethi.ll Specific Plan
Atrlendment No.1.
-
30.3 "Proiec:t". '!be def1nitian of the tcm "Project," as set
forth in secticn 2.13 of the Agleezrent, shall be deemed to inclUde
the leM use plan encorrpssed by the approval of General Plan
Amen:1ment No. 91-_ and AJbe:d'1ill Specific Plan Amendment No.1.
30.4 consistencv Findin:r. By apprcvin; and execut1n; this
.Amerx!ment, City firxW that the provisions of the ~, as
m:xlifieCl by this Atrlendment, are o:n;ist:ent with City'. General Plan
eM Albe:rhill Specific Plan Amen:!ment NO.1, eM City further fin:5s
eM determines that executicn of the Agreement, as m::dified by this
.Amerx:3ment, is in the best interests of the public health, safety and
general welfare of City's residents, property owners and taxpayers."
DE'fEL01'HEXt ACIEDCEIIt AJCEIn) 1 "ZI'l DUn
-
EXHIBIT 1
ZdS