Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Reso No 1992 RESOLUTION NO. 92-1 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-3 FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE 1990 GENERAL PLAN CHANGING FIVE (5) AND THREE (3) ACRES FROM LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, RESPECTIVELY WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the city of Lake Elsinore by William Tomlinson (Tomlinson & Son) to amend the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan to revise the land uses specified on the General Plan Land Use Map of the Land Use Element relating to approximately eight (8) acres presently located at the terminus of Riverside Drive, bounded by the southeast intersection of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive. WHEREAS public notice of said applications has been given, and the Planning commission has considered evidence presented by the applicant, Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this application on January 15, 1992; NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: - SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered Mitigated Negative Declaration 91-14 to the proposed General Plan Amendment 91-3, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed amendment to the 1990 City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. The Planning Commission finds and determines that Mitigated Negative Declaration 91-14 is adequate under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to analyze the environmental effects of General Plan Amendment 91-3, and recommends City Council approval, based upon the following findings and determinations: SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the city of Lake Elsinore the following finding for the approval of General Plan Amendment 91-3 have been made as follows: 1. The approval of the requested designations permits development to the highest and best nature within mitigable means to insure maintenance of the general public health safety and welfare. 2. Granting of the requested designations will permit reasonable development of the property consistent with its constraints and more compatible with adjacent properties and proposed development. - 3. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use density and usage more in character with the subject property's location, access and constraints. 4. The proposed change will not result in any significant adverse impacts on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the city Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approve General Plan Amendment 91-3. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning commission of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on January 15, 1992, by the fOllowing roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Sellevold, Wilsey and Saathoff NOES: commissioners: Gilenson ABSENT: commissioners: Brinley ABSTAIN: commissioners: None ....... /-------.'...") /' / '~ Bill Saa hoff, Chai n Lake Elsinore Planning Commission \~~ Kevin Shear, secretary to the Lake Elsinore Planning commission .....,., ....... RESOLUTION NO. 92-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH NORTH PEAK PARTNERS - WHEREAS, North Peak Partners has made application to the City of Lake Elsinore for a Development Agreement with respect to North Peak Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Development Agreement at its regular meeting on August 19, 1992, and considered the evidence and testimony presented in connection with the proposed Development Agreement, including but not limited to the environmental documentation therefore; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning commission of the city of Lake Elsinore as follows: section 1. The proposed Development Agreement between North Peak Partners and the City of Lake Elsinore is consistent with the city's General Plan and the North Peak Specific Plan. section 2. The previously certified Environmental Impact Report prepared for the North Peak Specific Plan is adequate and complete for the proposed Development Agreement. section 3. It is recommended that the City Council of the city of Lake Elsinore approve the proposed Development Agreement. - section 4. The Secretary of the Planning commission shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and forward a copy to the city Clerk for reference and consideration of the city Council. an ission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning commission at a regular meeting thereof conducted on August 19, 1992, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: Gilenson, Neff, Sellevold, Bullard and Brinley NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None ABSTAIN: Commissioners: None - IL~,~ ~~~ Kevin Shear, Secretary to the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission RESOLUTION NO. 92-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMEND- ING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF OAK GROVE EQUITIES (ELSINORE CITY CENTER) SPECIFIC PLAN 91-1. -- The Planning Commission of the city of Lake Elsinore does resolve as follows: section 1. The Planning Commission hereby certifies that there has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore an application by Oak Grove Equities, for adoption of Specific Plan 91-1, which consists of approximately 49.2 acres, for general commercial uses, with 8.6 acres of manufactured slopes, 4.2 acres of major roads and a Future Use Area of 3.8 acres, located at the southeast corner of Grape Street and Railroad Canyon Road; due notice of said application has been given and public hearing conducted thereon pursuant to State Planning and Zoning Law and local ordinances: section 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that: 1. This request will result in significant environmental impacts. Mitigation measures are proposed to reduce most of these impacts to insignificant levels. A Statement of Overriding Considerations shall be prepared to identify benefits that will outweigh remaining adverse impacts. 2. This request meets the Specific Plan criteria for content and systematic implementation of the General Plan established by section 65450 of the California Government Code and Section 17.99 of the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. -- 3. This request will not be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the project area, nor will it be injurious to the property or improvements in that area or the city as a whole, based upon the provisions of the Specific Plan, mitigation measures and Conditions of Approval. section 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council certify Environmental Impact Report 92-3, approve Specific Plan 91-1 and Zone Change 92-3, from C-P to SP, based upon the findings and Conditions of Approval listed in the Staff Report. Section 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify the adoption of this resolution and forward a copy to the City Clerk for reference and consideration of the city Council. -- I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a regular meeting thereof conducted on August 19, 1992, by the following vote: AYES: commissioners: Gilenson, Neff, Sellevold, Bullard and Brinley NOES: commissioners: None ABSENT: commissioners: None ABSTAIN: Commissioners: None KevJ~k~'~etary to the Planning Commission RESOLUTION NO. 92-4 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92-4 FOR THE AMENDMENT OF ALBERHILL SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE EXHIBIT II-3, BOUNDED BY INTERSTATE 15, TERRA COTTA ROAD/NICHOLS, PACIFIC CLAY AND ROBB/LAKE STREET; FILED BY MURDOCK ALBERHILL WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the city of Lake Elsinore by Murdock Alberhill to amend the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan to revise the land uses specified within Exhibit II-3 of the Land Use Element relating to the Alberhill Specific Plan; located on either side of Nichols Road between Lake Street and Interstate 15; WHEREAS public notice of said applications has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the applicant, Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this application on september 2, 1992; NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. The Planning commission has considered the previously certified Environmental Impact Report 89-2, the Addendum to Environmental Impact Report (EIR) 89-2, the proposed General Plan Amendment 92-4, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed amendment to the 1990 City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. The Planning commission finds and determines that EIR 89-2 and the Addendum thereto are adequate under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to analyze the environmental effects of General Plan Amendment 92-4, and recommends City Council approval, based upon the following findings and determinations: a. only minor technical changes and additions are necessary to make the FEIR 89-2 adequate to address the proposed General Plan Amendment, since substantial changes have not occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the existing General Plan was undertaken, the proposed changes to the General Plan will not require any important revision to FEIR 89-2, and there will be no new significant environ- mental impacts that were not considered in the FEIR; b. No mitigation measures or alternatives which were previously not considered in the FEIR 89- 2 would substantially lessen any significant effects on the environment; c. The changes to ErR 89-2 set forth in the Addendum thereto do not raise important new issues about any significant effects on the environment. d. No new information of substantial importance to the proposed General Plan project has become available. Page 2 Resolution No. 92-4 SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore the following finding for the approval of General Plan Amendment 92-4 have been made as follows: 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use and allow density more in keeping with the subject property's location, access and site characteristics. - The proposed amendment will not significantly al ter the land uses and intensi ty of the general plan. The General Plan Land Use Element currently provides an illustration of the precise land uses approved for the project site, through the adopted Alberhill Specific Plan. The illustrative indicates that the Specific Plan Area will contain residential, commercial, institutional and open space land uses. The proposed amendment will maintain the same land uses in revised locations consistent with the proposed Specific Plan. 2. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the surrounding land use designations. The proposed General Plan Amendment, which proposes to allow the development of residential, commercial, institutional, and open space is consistent with and similar to the surrounding residential and specific plan areas designated by the General Plan. The proposed Specific Plan proposes no land uses adverse to the proj ect si te or surrounding land uses. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approve General Plan Amendment 92-4, amending of Exhibit 11-3 within the city of Lake Elsinore General Plan, (See Exhibit 1). PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on September 2, 1992, by the following vote: AYES: commissioners: Gilenson, Sellevold and Brinley NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: commissioners: None ABSTAIN: commissioners: Bullard and Neff \'1 (\ '.~\,0-/- Kevin Shear, Secretary to the Lake Elsinore Planning commission iD - ; & ,. - ~ ! s;;a i. ~ 0 ci ~~ > f;a,.. ~ > ~ ~ r- fI) !"'= rn ., ~;a ~ ,...~ a. -r- ~r- ~ ~~ rr >Z > 2 ~ fI) ~ ; ~.~ : .'-.s I' I -...,' ~ >"'. t~J j y-) .f t. ." r- >> ~:I'I:IZ ~~ Z ~ ~ 1~ ~ . i i [ i - . ~~Sl ,al i~f" - !"- ...p ~;'~ l!'l ~~l~ ~ !'~ 1i I ~ ~ 1 ~ ... rt ..... p. ~~ i RESOLUTION NO. 92-5 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF '!HE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF MURDOCK ALBERHILL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT #2 FOR THE ALBERHILL SPECIFIC PLAN 89-2; BOUNDED BY INTERSTATE 15, TERRA COTTA ROAD/NICHOLS, PACIFIC CLAY AND ROBB/LAKE STREET; FILED BY MURDOCK DEVELOPMENT - WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the city of Lake Elsinore by Murdock Development to amend the Alberhill Specific Plan 89-2 to redesignate the land uses within a portion of the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan area, consisting of approximately 511.4 acres of land bounded generally by bounded by the Brighton Alberhill Specific Plan to the north, the extension of Terra Cotta Road to the east, Terra Cotta area to the south, and Robb/Lake Street to the west. WHEREAS public notice of said applications has been given, and the Planning commission has considered evidence presented by the applicant, Community Development Department, and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this application on September 2, 1992; NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: - SECTION 1. The Planning commission has considered the previously certified Environmental Impact Report 89-2, the Addendum to EIR 89-2, the proposed Murdock Specific Plan Amendment #2, prior to making a decision to recommend that the city Council approve the proposed Amendment to Specific Plan 89-2. The planning commission finds and determines that EIR 89-2 and the Addendum thereto are adequate under CEQA to analyze the environmental effects of Murdock Specific Plan Amendment #2, and recommends City Council approval, based upon the following findings and determinations: 1. The location and design of the proposed development shall be consistent with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan and with any other applicable plan or policies adopted by the ci ty , or in the process of being prepared and adopted. The proposed amendment to the specific plan is consistent with the goals and polices of the general plan, since the proposed project takes into consideration the uses permitted, surrounding land uses and existing and proposed circulation system. Additionally a concurrent general plan amendment is being processed to ensure consistency in land uses and policies is maintained. 2. The proposed location shall allow the development to be well-integrated with or adequately buffered from its surroundings, whichever may be the case. The propose location is well integrated and located to its surroundings since, the proposed project will be adjacent to similar residential, commercial, institutional, and open space uses which have already received specific plan approval. 3. All vehicular traffic generated by the development, either in phased increments or at full build-out, is to be accommodated safely Page 2 Resolution No. 92-5 4. and without causing undue congestion upon adjoining streets. A traffic study has been completed, which addresses all of the anticipated circulation system improvements necessary to adequately handle the project's expected traffic volumes. there will be no significant congestion during build out or at completion of the project. The Final Specific Plan shall identify a methodology(s) to allow land uses to be adequately serviced by existing or proposed public facilities and services. In appropriate circumstances, and as provided elsewhere by City Code, the City may require that suitable areas be reserved for schools, parks and pedestrian ways; or public open spaces shall be dedicated or reserved by private covenant for the common use of residents, establishments or operations in the development. The proposed project provides a phasing schedule for the development of adequate public facilities on an as needed basis tied to the build out of project phases. Additionally, the proposed project will provide sites for the development of parks, open space areas, and schools. - 5. The overall design of the Specific Plan will produce an attractive, efficient and stable development. The proposed amended specific plan contains design guidelines for the long term development of the project such as a phasing schedule of the overall project, logical location of land uses, and necessary circulation improvements to facilitate production of an attractive, efficient and stable development of the project. 6. In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), impacts have been reduced to a level of non- significance, or in the case where impacts remain, a statement of overriding considerations must be adopted to justify the merits of project implementation. An Addendum Environmental Impact Report to the Alberhill FEIR 89-2 has been prepared to address the minor technical revisions associated with the proposed project. The Alberhill FEIR addressed all the significant impacts and developed mi tigation measures reducing impacts to a level of insignificance. A statement of overriding considerations was adopted for impacts not reduced to a level of insignificance. SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.99.100 of the Zoning Ordinance, the findings by the City of Lake Elsinore for approval of Specific Plans have been made as follows: 1. The location and design of the proposed development shall be consistent with the Goals and Policies of the City's Page 3 Resolution No. 92-5 - General Plan and with any other applicable plan or policies adopted by the city, or in the process of being prepared and adopted. The proposed amended specific plan is consistent with the Goals and Polices of the General Plan, since the proposed project takes in to consideration the uses permitted, surrounding land uses and existing and proposed circulation system. Additionally a concurrent General Plan Amendment is being processed to ensure consistency in land uses and policies is maintained. 2. The proposed location shall allow the development to be well-integrated with or adequately buffered from its surroundings, whichever may be the case. The proposed location is well integrated and located to its surroundings since, the proposed proj ect will be adj acent to similar residential, commercial, institutional, and open space uses which have already received specific plan approval. 3. All vehicular traffic generated by the development, either in phased increments or at full build-out, is to be accommodated safely and without causing undue congestion upon adjoining streets. A traffic study has been completed, which addresses all of the anticipated circulation system improve- ments necessary to adequately handle the project's expected traffic volumes. There will be no significant congestion during build-out or at completion of the project. 4. The Final Specific Plan shall identify a methodology(s) to allow land uses to be adequately serviced by existing or proposed public facilities and services. In appropriate circumstances, and as provided elsewhere by City Code, the city may require that suitable areas be reserved for schools, parks and pedestrian ways; or public open spaces shall be dedicated or reserved by private covenant for the common use of residents, establishments or operations in the development. The proposed project provides a phasing schedule for the development of adequate public facilities on an as needed basis tied to the build out of project phases. Additionally, the proposed project will provide sites for the development of parks, open space areas, and schools. 5. The overall design of the Specific Plan will produce an attractive, efficient and stable development. The proposed amended specific plan contains design guidelines for the long term development of the project such as a phasing schedule of the overall project, logical location of land uses, and necessary circulation improvements to facilitate production of an attractive, efficient and stable development of the project. 6. In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), impacts have been reduced to a level of non-significance, or in the case where impacts remain, a statement of overriding considerations must be adopted to justify the merits of Page 4 Resolution No. 92-5 project implementation. An Addendum Environmental Impact Report to the Alberhill FEIR 89-2 has been prepared to address the minor technical reV1S1ons associated with the proposed project. The Alberhill FEIR addressed all the significant impacts and developed mi tigation measures reducing impacts to a level of insignificance. A statement of overriding considerations was adopted for impacts not reduced to a level of insignificance. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approve Specific Plan Amendment #2, amending Specific Plan 89-2. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on September 2, 1992, by the following vote: AYES: commissioners: Gilenson, Sellevold and Brinley NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: commissioners: None ABSTAIN: commissioners: _\iA ~L Kevin Shear, Secretary to the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission - RESOLUTION NO. 92-6 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH MURDOCK ALBERHILL --- WHEREAS, Murdock Alberhill has made application to the City of Lake Elsinore for a Development Agreement with respect to Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning commission of the City of Lake Elsinore held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Development Agreement at its regular meeting on September 2, 1992, and considered the evidence and testimony presented in connection with the proposed Development Agreement, including but not limited to the environmental documentation therefore; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the city of Lake Elsinore as follows: section 1. The proposed Development Agreement between Murdock Alberhill and the City of Lake Elsinore is consistent with the City's General Plan and with the Amendment to the Alberhill Specific Plan. section 2. The previously certified Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Alberhill Specific Plan is adequate and complete for the proposed Development Agreement. section 3. It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approve the proposed Development Agreement. - section 4. The Secretary of the Planning commission shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and forward a copy to the City Clerk for reference and consideration of the city Council. /~ I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a regular meeting thereof conducted on September 2, 1992, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: Gilenson, Sellevold, and Brinley NOES: commissioners: None ABSENT: commissioners: None ABSTAIN: commissioners: Bullard and Neff - IL~ ~l - Kevin Shear, Secretary to the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission RESOLUTION NO. 92-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92-1 FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE 1990 GENERAL PLAN TO REDESIGNATE 20 ACRES FROM VERY LOW DENSITY TO LOW MEDIUM DENSITY - WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Robert R. Dyer and Linda D. Wynn to amend the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan to revise the land uses specified on the General Plan Land Use Map of the Land Use Element relating to approximately twenty (20) acres situated between the northwest corner of the Tuscany Hills Specific Plan and Tentative Tract Map 25830 (Homestead Land Development. WHEREAS public notice of said applications has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the applicant, Community Development Department and other interested parties at a pUblic hearing held with respect to this application on October 21, 1992; NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: -- SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered Negative Declaration 92-8 to the proposed General Plan Amendment 92-1, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed amendment to the 1990 City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. The Planning Commission finds and determines that Negative Declaration 92-8 is adequate under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to analyze the environmental effects of General Plan Amendment 92-1, and recommends City Council approval, based upon the following findings and determinations: SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of General Plan Amendment 92-1 have been made as follows: 1. The approval of the requested designations permi ts development to the highest and best nature within mitigable means to insure maintenance of the general public health safety and welfare. 2. Granting of the requested designations will permit reasonable development of the property consistent with its constraints and more compatible wi th adj acent properties and proposed development. 3. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use density and usage more in character with the subject property's location, access and constraints. 4. The proposed change will not result in any significant adverse impacts on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the city of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City council of the city of Lake Elsinore approve General Plan Amendment 92-1. Resolution No. 92-7 Page 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning commission of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on October 21, 1992, by the following electronic vote: AYES: Commissioners: Gilenson, Bullard, Sellevold and Brinley NOES: Commissioners: None - ABSENT: Commissioners: None ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Neff ATTEST: . II I t~~ Kevin Shear, Secretary to the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ..... ..... RESOLUTION NO. 92-8 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92-3 TO IMPLEMENT THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN LAND USE PLAN ESTABLISHING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE LEVEL DESIGNATIONS FOR THIS AREA. THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN ENCOMPASSES APPROXIMATELY 486 ACRES AND IS LOCATED IN THE HISTORIC CORE OF THE CITY. THE AREA IS GENERALLY BOUNDED TO THE NORTH BY COLLIER AVENUE AND INTERSTATE 15, TO THE SOUTH BY LAKESHORE DRIVE, THE WEST BY CHANEY STREET, AND THE EAST BY GROVE AVENUE, CONKLIN AVENUE AND RUPARD STREET. WHEREAS, the General Plan must be periodically updated to meet new conditions and from time to time be revised or amplified to respond to unforeseen changes or needs; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated the responsibilities of making recommendations for changes in the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held necessary hearings in accordance with State Planning Law for the adoption of General Plan Amendments t the General Plan; and - WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered Mitigated Negative Declaration 92-7 to the proposed General Plan Amendment 92-3, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed amendment to the 1990 City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. The Planning Commission finds and determines that Mitigated Negative Declaration 92-7 is adequate under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to analyze the environmental effects of General Plan Amendment 92-3, and recommends city Council approval, based upon the following findings and determinations: 1. The approval of the requested designations permi ts development to the highest and best nature within mitigable means to insure maintenance of the general public health safety and welfare. 2. Granting of the requested designations will permit reasonable development of the property consistent with its constraints and more compatible wi th adj acent properties and proposed development. 3. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use density and usage more in character with the subject property's location, access and constraints. 4. The proposed change will not result in any significant adverse impacts on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approve General Plan Amendment 92-3. - Resolution No. 92-8 Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the ci ty of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on December 2, 1992, by the following vote: AYES: commissioners: Neff, Bullard and Brinley NOES: commissioners: Gilenson ABSENT: commissioners: None ABSTAIN: commissioners: None :,r;yz.' Pamela Bri Lake Elsinore ATTEST: ~ Kevin Shear, Secretary to the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission RESOLUTION NO. 92-9 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92-2 FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE 1990 GENERAL PLAN TO REDESIGNATE 33 ACRES OF BUSINESS PARK AND 15 ACRES OF FREEWAY BUSINESS TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by William and Rosalyne Hall to amend the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan to revise the land uses specified on the General Plan Land Use Map of the Land Use Element relating to 33 acres located at the northwest intersection of Tenth Street and Dexter Avenue and 15 acres located to the north and south of Cambern Avenue (east of Central Avenue [State Highway 74]). WHEREAS public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the applicant, Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this application on December 2, 1992; NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: - SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered Mitigated Negative Declaration 92-6 to the proposed General Plan Amendment 92-2, prior to making a decision to recommend that the city Council approve the proposed amendment to the 1990 City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. The Planning Commission finds and determines that Negative Declaration 92-6 is adequate under California Environ- mental Quality Act (CEQA) to analyze the environmental effects of General Plan Amendment 92-2, and recommends City Council approval, based upon the following findings and determinations: SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of General Plan Amendment 92-2 have been made as follows: 1. The approval of the requested designations permits development to the highest and best nature within mitigable means to insure maintenance of the general public health safety and welfare. 2. Granting of the requested designations will permit reasonable development of the property consistent with its constraints and more compatible wi th adj acent properties and proposed development. 3. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use density and usage more in character with the subject property's location, access and constraints. 4. The proposed change will not result in any significant adverse impacts on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approve General Plan Amendment 92-2. Resolution No. 92-9 Page 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on December 2, 1992, by the following vote: - AYES: commissioners: Gilenson, Neff, Bullard and Brinley NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: commissioners: None ABSTAIN: Commissioners: None ATTEST: -~ Kevin Shear, Secretary to the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission -