HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Reso No 1983RESOLUTION NO. 83 -1
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE BOUNDARIES
OF THE RANCHO LAGUNA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO.
II, FORMULATING AND APPROVING A PRELIMINARY
PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT AREA,
AND TRANSMITTING THE PRELIMINARY PLAN TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 33322 of the California Community
Redevelopment Law ( "Redevelopment Law "), the Planning Commission may
select and designate the boundaries of a redevelopment project area
comprised of all or part of a redevelopment survey area and formulate
a Preliminary Plan for such redevelopment project area; and
WHEREAS, the Planning
area boundaries, formulate
Plan for the redevelopment
No. II, attached hereto as
reference, and submit such
Agency of the City of Lake
Redevelopment Plan for suc
Commission desires to select the project
a Preliminary Plan, adopt the Preliminary
of the Rancho Laguna Redevelopment Project
Exhibit "1" and incorporated herein by
Preliminary Plan to the Redevelopment
Elsinore for preparation of an official
h Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake
Elsinore does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission hereby selects and designates
the boundaries of the Rancho Laguna Redevelopment Project No. II,
illustrated and described in Exhibit "I" attached hereto.
SECTION 2. The Planning Commission hereby adopts the Preliminary
Plan formulated for the redevelopment of the Rancho Laguna Redevelop-
ment Project No. II.
SECTION 3. The Secretary is directed to forward a copy of this
Resolution along with the attached Preliminary Plan, to the Redevelop-
ment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore.
SECTION 4. The Secretary of this Commission shall certify to
the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st. day of March, 1983.
AYES: Saathoff, Washburn, Barnhart, Steed
NOES: None
ABSENT: Dominguez
ning Commission Chairman
ATTEST:
'fflanning Commissio ecru ev
)fD
y" t
J
ry .J
°'
p1 �
cue obi
N
-n
r
n
tG
x
dQ
�
o
d
b
rt
°
A
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -2
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, ATTACHED HERETO AS
EXHIBIT "A ", FOR THE RANCHO LAGUNA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. II CON-
FORMS TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AND TRANSMITTING
ITS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
WHEREAS, on March 1, 1983, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 83 -1
and thereby adopted a Preliminary Plan for the redevelopment of the Rancho
Laguna Redevelopment Project II within the City of Lake Elsinore; and
WHEREAS, said Planning Commission Resolution directed the Secretary of
this Commission to transmit the Preliminary Plan to the Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Lake Elsinore for the preparation of an official Redevelopment
Plan for the project; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No.
83 -1, a Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Laguna Redevelopment Project No. II
was prepared and transmitted to.this Commission. The boundaries of the
Rancho Laguna Redevelopment Project No. II are specifically described in the
Redevelopment Plan; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Redevelopment Plan is attached hereto as Exhibit
"A "; and
WHEREAS, this Commission has reviewed the Redevelopment Plan with particular
regard to the Plan's conformity to the General Plan of the City of Lake Elsinore.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore does
resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. The Redevelopment Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "A ", conforms
to the General Plan of the City of Lake Elsinore.
SECTION 2. This Resolution shall constitute this Commission's report and
recommendation to the City Council with regard to the Redevelopment Plan as re-
quired by the California Health and Safety Code Section 33346.
SECTION 3. The Secretary of this Commission shall (a) certify to the ad-
option of this resolution, and (b) transmit a copy of this resolution to the
City Council and to the Redevelopment Agency.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of June , 1983.
AYES: Steed, Washburn, Dominguez, Barnhart, Saathoff
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
anning Commission tfiairman
ATTEST:
Planning Commission Sec ry
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -3
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
DETERMINING THAT THE PROPOSED USE OF A BUS
TRANSPORTATION TERMINAL IS COMPATIBLE WITH
THE M -1 (MANUFACTURING DISTRICT ZONE)
WHEREAS, on August 16, 1983, the proponents of Industrial Project 83 -2
approached the City Planning Commission to request a bus transportation terminal
within the M -1 Zone; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Section 17.56.020 B
provides that Planning Commission may determine by resolution which other
businesses or enterprises are compatible with the M -1 (Manufacturing District
Zone).
1. That the proposed use of a bus
transportation terminal is
similar to the businesses or
enterprises listed in Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code, Section
17.56.020 A; and
2. That the proposed use is not
more detrimental or incom-
patible with the M -1 District
than those listed in Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code,
Section 17.56.020 A.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of August, 1983.
0
d Dom' ngue�, Ac n
ATTEST:
A4w,
'Linda Grindstaff, etary
Planning Commis ion
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -4
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 83 -1
WHEREAS, the General Plan must be periodically updated to meet new
conditions and from time to time be revised or amplified to respond to unforeseen
changes or needs; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated the responsibilities of making recommendations for changes in the General
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan was adopted by the City Council on December
14, 1982; and
WHEREAS, proposed changes in the General Plan should be evaluated in
regard to environmental impact and consistency; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has held
necessary hearings in accordance with State Planning Law for the adoption of
General Plan Amendments to the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission feels the changes to the General Plan
will result in a more useable and manageable General Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does hereby
adopt the Staff Environmental Assessment and recommends approval of General Plan
Amendment 83 -1 changing the land use density from 2.0 to 2.5 dwelling units per
acre.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission finds there is not
any anticipated significant adverse effects to be caused by this change to the
General Plan, and recommends to the City Council that a Negative Declaration of
Environmental Impact be filed for General Plan Amendment 83 -1.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November, 1983, upon the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioner's Saathoff, Dominguez, Washburn, Barnhart
and Chairman Steed.
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTENTIONS: None
Whit Steed, Chairman, Lake
Elsinore Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Acting Secretary, Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -5
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 83 -3
WHEREAS, the General Plan must be periodically ipdated to meet new
conditions and from time to time be revised or amplified to respond to unforeseen
changes or needs; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated the responsibilities of making recommendations for changes in the General
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan was adopted by the City Council on December
14, 1982; and
WHEREAS, proposed changes in the General Plan should be evaluated in
regard to environmental impact and consistency; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has held
necessary hearings in accordance with State Planning Law for the adoption of
General Plan Amendments to the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission feels the changes to the General Plan
will result in a more useable and manageable General Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does hereby
adopt the Staff Environmental Assessment and recommends approval of General Plan
Amendment 83 -3 changing the Land Use Element from Tourist Commercial to Specific
Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission finds there is not
any anticipated significant adverse effects to be caused by this change to the
General Plan, and recommends to the City Council that a Negative Declaration of
Environmental Impact be filed for General Plan Amendment 83 -3.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November, 1983, upon the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioner's Saathoff, Dominguez, Washburn, Barnhart
and Chairman Steed.
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTENTIONS: None
U'LDA, CZ0 -
Whit Steed, Chairm n, Lake
Elsinore Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Acting Secretary, Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -6
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 83 -4 (a) and (b)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated the responsibilities of making recommendations for changes in the General
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has held
necessary hearings in accordance with State Planning Law for the adoption of General
Plan Amendments; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan was adopted by the City Council on December
14, 1982; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission feels the changes to the Circulation
Element and to the Land Use Element will result in a more useable and manageable
General Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does hereby
recommend to the City Council that a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact
be filed, and that the General Plan Circulation Element and Land Use Element be
amended as follows:
AMENDMENT NO. 83 -4(a) to the Circulation Element - Change vehicular
classification element as follows:
Railroad Canyon Road from Casino Drive to Mission Trail - revise from
100 feet right -of -way and 76 feet curb to curb to 110 feet right -of -way
and 86 feet curb to curb.
Casino Drive - Franklin Avenue - Pottery Street - from Malaga Road to
Channey Street - revise from 100 feet right -of -way and 76 feet curb to
curb to 80 feet right -of -way and 64 feet curb to curb.
Lakeshore Drive from Main Street to Riverside Drive - revise from 88
feet right -of -way and 64 feet curb to curb to 80 feet right -of -way and
64 feet curb to curb.
Lakeshore Drive from Riverside_ Drive to Robb Road (future intersection
with Grand Avenue) - revise from 110 feet right -of -way and 86 feet curb
to curb to 100 feet right -of -way and 76 feet curb to curb.
Collier Avenue from Central Avenue to Riverside Drive - revise from 66
feet right -of -way and 62 feet curb to curb to 100 feet right -of -way and 76
feet curb to curb.
Riverside Drive from Collier Avenue to Gunnerson Street (Strickland
Avenue) - revise from 60 feet right -of -way and 40 feet curb to curb
to 100 feet right -of -way and 76 feet curb to curb.
The following revised pages are attached hereto as Exhibit "A ", to replace those
in the General Plan Text - CIR 2, CIR 3, CIR 11, CIR 13 and CIR 19. A revised map
is attached hereto as Exhibit "B ", entitled "City of Lake Elsinore General Plan
1992 Land Use Map.
AMENDMENT NO. 83 -4(b) to the Land Use Element:
Revise "(17) Country Club Heights Planned District" as shown on revised
pages LU 25 and LU 26 of the General Plan Text attached hereto as Exhibit
"C ", attached pages identified as Figures LU 1, LU 2, and LU 3, and
attached hereto as Exhibit "D ". The attached revised map (Exhibit "B ")
entitled "City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Land Use Map" identifies the
added Planned District as shown in detail on Figure LU 3.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November, 1983, upon the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioner's Saathoff, Dominguez, Washburn, Barnhart
and Chairman Steed.
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTENTIONS: None
S4
Whit Steed, Chairman, Lake
Elsinore Planning Commission
ATTEST:
A�
Acting Secretary, Planning Commission
EXHIBIT "A"
Circulation
DEFINITIONS
Freeway means a highway upon which the abutter's right of access is controlled,
and which provides separated grades at intersecting streets and is designated as
a "Freeway" by the California State Department of Transportation or other
Governmental Agency.
Arterial Street shall mean a divided highway primarily for through traffic to
which access from abutting property shall be kept at a minimum. Intersections
with other streets or highways shall be limited to approximately one - quarter mile
intervals.
Major street shall mean a street intended for the movement of major volumes of
traffic through the City or serving to collect traffic from two or more intersect-
ing secondary streets. Access from abutting properties shall be kept at a minimum
and intersections with other streets shall be limited to approximately one - eighth
mile intervals..
Secondary Street shall mean a street for the movement of large volumes of traffic
through the City or serving to collect traffic from two or more intersection
collector streets.
Modified Secondary Street shall mean a street for the movement of large volumes of
traffic through the City or serving to collect traffic from two or more intersect-
ing collector streets. Modified right -of -way shall be used within topographic
constraints due to significant features of the area.
Collector Street means a street which is intended to serve extensive residential
land use, multiple family dwellings or to convey traffic through a subdivision to
roads of equal capacity or greater.
Modified Collector Street means a street which is intended to serve limited
industrial land use and to convey traffic through the developments to roads of
equal capacity or greater.
Bikeway means all facilities that provide primarily for bicycle travel. The follow-
ing categories of bikeways are defined in Section 2373 of the Streets and Highways
Code.
BIKE PATH OR BIKE TRAIL - CLASS I BIKEWAY - Provides a completely separated
right -of -way designated for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians
with crossflows by motorists minimized.
BIKE LAND - CLASS II BIKEWAY - Provides a restricted right -of -way designated
for the exclusive or semi - exclusive use of bicycles with through travel by
motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and cross -
flows by pedestrians and motorists permitted.
BIKE ROUTE - CLASS III BIKEWAY - Provides a right -of -way designated by signs
or permanent markings and shared with pedestrians or motorists.
The terms Network, Network Plan, or Bicycle Network as used in this element shall
refer to the corridors shown on the Bikeway Plan Map.
CIR 2
Revised 12 -27 -83
EXHIBIT "A"
Circulation
FINDINGS
Regional access to the City of Lake Elsinore is provided by Interstate 15 and
State Highway 74. These highways provide the City and the project area with
good access to neighboring population centers, including the San Diego, Riverside,
Los Angeles and Orange County metropolitan areas.
Traffic volume on highways leading to and from Lake Elsinore has been increasing
steadily in recent years. Between 1977 and 1980, traffic volumes increased on
I -15 by 7% at Murietta Hot Springs Road, and 17% at Temescal Canyon Road. Traffic
on Ortega Highway increased 20 %, and 21% on Route 74 between Lake Elsinore and
Perris (see Table 7 in Appendix A).
The most heavily travelled route is I -15 to Los Angeles and Orange Counties. The
number of commuters on this route is not determinable from available data. However,
the increasing percentage of traffic is indicative of the geographic and economic
interdependence of Lake Elsinore within the Southern California area.
Access within the City and sphere of influence is provided by a combination of
highways and streets. Arterials include Main Street, Collier Street, Riverside
Drive, Central Avenue, Ortega Highway, Grand Avenue, Mission Trail, Railroad Canyon
Road and Robb Road (Lakeshore Drive). Secondary streets include Machado Street,
Corydon,Street and Bundy Canyon Road, See Figure 11 in Appendix A for traffic
volumes along these roads.
Many of the major roads are paved but in poor condition; a number of roads lack
curbs and gutters. Flooding in 1980 also disrupted access, particularly in the
downtown area along the outflow channel. In addition, secondary roads are generally
unpaved or in very poor condition. These conditions hinder pedestrian traffic as
well as vehicular traffic in many portions of the City.
Needed improvements related to the transportation system include:
Various road improvements, requiring base, pavement and overlay work,
have been identified by the City. These improvements are required
to maintain the existing road network, particularly the main routes
around the lake and in the business area.
Areas within the City, particularly near the Central Business
District, have inadequate vehicular and pedestrian access, due to
the disruption of roads caused by the 1980 flooding.
Large areas within the City and Sphere of Influence, especially
north and west of the lake, are inaccessible.
Intercity transit service is provided by Greyhound Bus Lines which provides service
to Los Angeles and San Diego. Bus service to Riverside is provided by the Riverside
Transit Corporation on a limited basis.
CIR 3
Revised 12 -27 -83
EXHIBIT 'W'
Circulation
STANDARDS
The standards listed below are established as criteria to be used in carrying out
the implementation programs of the General Plan. The numbering system relates to
each set of standards to a particular objective and its implementation programs
(e.g., Standards 2.1.a relate to Objective 2.1.a).
STANDARDS (2.1.a)
(1) The City has adopted the road standards of Riverside County as the standards
for roads within the City, except for Lakeshore Drive from Highway 74, to
Main Street. For sections of Lakeshore Drive, the City has adopted standards
for a Modified Secondary Highway. For Collier Avenue from Main Street to
Nichols Road the City has adopted a modified Collector. Figure CIRC -2
illustrates the road.standards adopted by the City of Lake Elsinore. Appendix
H -G contains the County of Riverside standard drawings for various road
classifications.
(2) Park and ride lots provide parking at the fringe of metropolitan areas as
places where ridesharers can meet, leave their cars and continue their trip
by carpool, vanpool, buspool or transit. These lots may be identified as
park and ride, park and pool or both. Park and pool facilities are generally
for the use of carpoolers, while park and ride facilities are predominantly
for the use of transit riders.
STANDARDS (2.1.b)
(1) Each major residential, commercial, or industrial project shall have at
least one bus stop facility.
STANDARDS (2.1.0
(1) Parking standards for various land uses are contained in the Zoning
Ordinance.-
STANDARDS (2.1.d)
(1) The Planning and Design Criteria for Bikeways in California approved by
the Director of the California Department of Transportation shall be
used by the City as the City's criteria and standards.
CIR 11
Revised 12- 27< -;83
EXHIBIT "A"
Circulation
PROGRAMS
The goals section of this element provides short titles for Circulation Element
Implementation Programs. The following text describes these programs in detail
and outlines the method of financing, the responsible agency, and timing necessary
to fulfill the Circulation Element goals.
IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS (2.1.a.1)
Develop a Capital Improvement Program for acquiring rights -of -way and for con-
structing, improving, and maintaining streets and highways.
Responsibility: Engineering and Public Works Department in conjunction with
the five (5) year incremental Capital Improvement Program
process.
Financing: Utilization of Capital Improvement Fund accounts provided
within City /Agency Budgets, including revenue bonds and
federal and state grants.
Timing: Initiate in conjunction with development of five (5) year
Capital Improvement Program during 1983 -1984 Budget review
and process and identification of yearly work tasks.
IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM (2.1.a.2)
The City shall develop a detailed complete road improvements program and a
funding program.
Responsibility: Engineering and Public Works Department in conjunction
with the Planning Department.
Financing: Utilization of Capital Improvement Fund accounts provided
within City /.Agency Budgets, including revenue bonds,
annexation fees, connection fees, developer contributions,
and federal and state grants.
Timing: Initiate during 1983 -84 Budget review process and continue
every five ( 5) years.
IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM (2.1.a.3)
The City will complete the street improvements listed in the Rancho Laguna Re-
development Plan.
CIR 13
Revised 12 -27 -83
EXHIBIT "A"
Circulation
REFERENCES
1. Rancho Laguna Redevelopment Plan, Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency,
7/81. -
2. Regional Transportation Plan, 1980, Southern California Association
of Governments.
CIR 19
Revised 12 -27 -83
\
4$
.
\CL
!
) |
W
2
!
2 } ;) .
§; §,
m
N
-0
o<,,�
(
(§\
cu
�§
A §\( |`
U J
_
J
§k \w §RmEk
=e=
LM
U- 1
EXHIBIT "B"
EXHIBIT "C"
(15) Extractive
Land Use
This designation is applied only to areas containing economically or
potentially economically extractable mineral resources. The designation
promotes extraction as the principal and dominant use. Uses other than
extraction and.processing of mineral resources are allowed only when they
will not interfere with present or future extraction. Uses such as'
processing, agriculture and open space which are supportive of, or
compatible with, mining are also allowed. Interim uses which are not
compatible, but which will be removed, may be allowed.
(16) Mixed Use — Residential /Commercial
This designation is applied to areas where a mixture of residential and
commercial activities are desired. It permits residential densities ranging
from a minimum of 7.3 du /net acres to a maximum of 20.0 du /net acres.
Commercial uses permitted in the General and Tourist Commercial designations
are permitted in this land use designation. Examples of uses to be
permitted in this designation include retail or office uses on the ground
floor with residential above. Apartments and condominiums in close
proximity to commercial uses would also be permitted.
(17) Planned Districts which includes the Three Country Club Heights
Locations with some Adjacent Areas.
This designation is applied to the area northwest and northeast of the
Central Business District and where more specifically shown on Figures LU1,
I112 and LU3. The area is characterized by steep slopes, hilly terrain,
narrow winding roads, and soils with severe building constraints. The
existing subdivision pattern, established in the 1920's, precludes
development on many of the lots under existing zoning, grading, and building
code requirements.
It is the purpose of this designation to provide for the development of land
in Country Club Heights and adjacent areas in a manner that will retain and
enhance the economic, cultural and historic values, and the overall quality
of life within the community. The Planned District seeks to establish
zoning requirements that are tailored to the unique circumstances of the
above mentioned areas.
These Country Club Heights Planned Districts which include the three
locations with some adjacent areas will incorporate the following features:
• Existing lot sizes and legal lots will be recognized;
• Setbacks and lot coverage requirements will be determined after a
study of existing lot configurations is completed. Topography
constraints will be considered in establishing these requirements,
and requirements in different parts of the district may vary;
• Building height and bulk requirements will be established to insure
that future buildings blend into the topography rather than creating
LU25 Revised 12/27/83
EXHIBIT "C"
Land, Uae
prominent visual features when viewed from a distance;
o Percolation tests will be required to determine the suitability of
individual lots for septic tanks, if sewer service cannot practically
be extended into the area.
o Grading of pads for construction is to be minimized. Unique solutions
to topographic constraints are to be encouraged;
o A circulation pattern should be established that minimizes road
grading. A system of one -way streets should be considered for the
area;
o Reduced right -of -way widths to as narrow as 18 feet, if necessary,
shall be considered. Reduced roadway widths of from 32 feet to as
narrow as 14 feet shall be considered, if justified by existing
conditions;
o Office -type commercial uses should be considered for the area along
Lakeshore Drive near Riverside Drive;
o Non -conforming uses which exist at the time the Planned District is
adopted may be continued provided no enlargement or additions are
made to such uses;
o The Planned District implementing Ordinance shall specify permitted
uses in various parts of the District, allowable variations from the
adopted grading standards and reduced street right - of-way and curb -
to- curb widths;
o Landscaping requirements will permit the use of planter walls in
conjunction with grading requirements;
o A Transfer of Development Rights option should be considered for
inclusion in the Planned District implementing Ordinance; and,
o A Design Criteria and Guidelines section of the implementing
Ordinance or separate resolution authorized by the implementing
Ordinance should be included as an appendix to the implementing
Ordinance, and could include review and approval of housing units
or developments on a project -by- project basis by the Planning
Commission and City Council because of the need to apply the criteria
and guidelines to extremely varying existing conditions.
LU26 Revised 12/27/83
s
02- Rancho La Laguna & PM 8535,
11,395, 10109
03 -Low Rolling Hills
04 -Low Rolling Hills
05 -A.P. Map 48 Unrec.
06 -A.P. Map 48 Unrec.
07- Country Club Hts. Unit E
08- Country Club Hts. Unit E
09 -A.P. Map 48 Unrec.
10 -A.P. Map 48 Unrec. P.M.
13,539
11 -A.P. Map 48 Unrec.
12- Country Club Hts. Unit H
13- Country Club Hts. Unit H
14- Country Club Hts. Units C & H
15- Country Club Hts. Units C & D
16- Country Club Hts. Unit D
17 -A.P. Map 48 Unrec. & Country Club
Hts. Unit A
18- Country Club Hts. Unit A
19- Country Club Hts. Unit B
20 -A.P. Map 41 & Country Club Hts.
Unit B
21- Country Club Hts. Unit G
22- Country Club Hts. Unit A
23- Country Club Hts. Unit B
24- Country Club Hts. Unit A
25- Country Club Hts. Unit A
EXISTING ZONING R -1. Some M -1 and R -2.
V
V
v
FIGURE L I
A. FZ MAPFIDDK 378
BK
383
EXHIBIT "D"
SHEET I OF 3
02- Country Club Heights Unit
03- Country Club Heights Unit
04- Country Club Heights Unit
05- Country Club Heights Unit
06- Country Club Heights Unit
07- Country Club Heights Unit
Sunset Knoll I
08- Country Club Heights Unit
09- Lakeshore Drive Addition
12- Country Club Heights Unit
13- Country Club Heights Unit
Sunset Knolls #1
14- Sunset Knolls #1
15- Country Club
16- Country Club
A.P. Map 48
17- Country Club
Sunset Knoll
18- Country Club
20- Country Club-
M
I
a
ro
ro
N
I
a
cn
z
H
z
o .H
N I
cn
a
z a,
H r!
H O
M N
H
W
Heights
Heights
- Sunset
Heights
#1
Heights
- Fights
12 & 20
12 & 8
8
8 & 9
8,12,9
12
9,12,24
F No. 9
24
Unit 20,2E
Unit 26,
Knolls #1
24
#10,11
\#16,11
li
0
21- Country Club Heights Unit 19,21,
and 26
22- Country Club Heights 17,18,21,24
and 26 - Sunset Knolls #1
23- Country Club Heights Unit 10,11,
14,15, and 16
26- Country Club Heights Unit 16 & 17
27- Country Club Heights Unit 17 & 18
28- Country Club Heights Uni5 18,19,
21, and 26
29- Country Club Heights Unit 26,
A.P. Map 48
30- Country Club Heights Unit 22,25,
and 26
31- Country Club Heights Unit 22,23,
and 25
32- Country Club Heights Unit 23,25
33-Lakeshore-Blvd. Heights - Country
Club Heights Unit 22,23
34 -Low Rolling Hills - Lakeshore
Blvd. Heights - Country Club Hts.
Unit 22
FIGURE LU 2
A. /F 9P OpDM 37.5
1 Z
Q
J
d
n
O
O
J
LL
Q
W
}
I
EXHIBIT "D"
SHEET 2 OF 3
EXISTING ZONING R -1 and some C -1, R -2
05- Country
Club Heights Unit 7
LU
06- Country
Club Heights Unit 5
07- Elsinore
Heights Tract Unit
2
and Elsinore
Heights Tract
Unit 3
08- Elsinore
Heights Tract Unit
3
09- Elsinore
Heights Tract Unit
2
10- Country
Club Heights Unit 5
11- Elsinore
Heights Tract Unit
1
Country
Club Heights Unit 1
& 4
12- Country
Club Heights Unit 3
13- Country
Club Heights Unit 3
14- Rice's De
Luxe View Tr.
Hampton's
First Addition
Gulliver's
Place
17- Country
Club Heights Unit 2
h
ti
F
I G U R E
LU
3
EXHIBIT "D"
/I P. /W/P/°
FODK 373
SHEET 3 OF 3
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -7
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 83 -5
WHEREAS, the General Plan must be periodically updated to meet new
conditions and from time to time be revised or amplified to respond to unforeseen
changes or needs; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated the responsibilities of making recommendations for changes in the General
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan was adopted by the City Council on December
14, 1982; and
WHEREAS, proposed changes in the General Plan should be evaluated in
regard to environmental impact and consistency; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has held
necessary hearings in accordance with State Planning Law for the adoption of
General Plan Amendments to the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission feels the changes to the General Plan
will result in a more useable and manageable General Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does hereby
adopt the Staff Environmental Assessment and recommends approval of General Plan
Amendment 83 -5 changing the land use from Medium Density to High Density.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission finds there is not
any anticipated significant adverse effects to be caused by this change to the
General Plan, and recommends to the City Council that a Negative Declaration of
Environmental Impact be filed for General Plan Amendment 83 -5.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November, 1983, upon the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioner's Saathoff, Dominguez, Washburn, Barnhart
and Chairman Steed.
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTENTIONS: None
,Z
Whit Steed, Chairman, Lake
Elsinore Planning Commission
ATTEST: Q
Acting Secretary, Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -8
A SUPPLEMENTAL RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -3.
WHEREAS, the General Plan must be periodically updated to meet new
conditions and from time to time be revised or amplified to respond to unfore-
seen changes or needs; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated the responsibilities of making recommendations for changes in the
General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan was adopted by the City Council on December
14, 1982; and
WHEREAS, proposed changes in the General Plan should be evaluated in
regard to environmental impact and consistency; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has held
necessary hearings in accordance with State Planning Law for the adoption of
General Plan Amendments to the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission feels the changes to the General
Plan will result in a more useable and manageable General Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does
hereby adopt the Staff Environmental Assessment and recommends approval of
General Plan Amendment 83 -3 changing the Land Use Element from Tourist Commercial
to Specific Plan, with a density of four (4) dwelling units per acre.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission finds there is
not any anticipated significant adverse effects to be caused by this change to
the General Plan, and recommends to the City Council that a Negative Declaration
of Environmental Impact be filed for General Plan Amendment 83 -3.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of December, 1983, upon the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Saathoff, Dominguez, Washburn, Barnhart and Chairman Steed
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTENTIONS: None
James W. Steed, Chairman
ATTEST: Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
4��2'/2 '2 Z�L�
Linda Grindsta f
Planning Commission etary
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -9
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMEND-
MENT 83 -6
WHEREAS, the General Plan must be periodically updated to meet new conditions
and from time to time be revised or amplified to respond to unforeseen changes or
needs; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated the responsibilities of making recommendations for changes in the General
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan was adopted by the City Council on December 14,
19.82; and
WHEREAS, proposed changes in the General Plan should be evaluated in regard
to environmental impact and consistency; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has held
necessary hearings in accordance with State Planning Law for the adoption of General
Plan Amendments to the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission feels the changes to the General Plan will
result in a more useable and manageable General Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does hereby
adopt the Staff Environmental Assessment and recommends approval of General Plan
Amendment 83 -6 changing the land use from Medium Density (6.1 -12 du /acre) to High
Density (12.1 -20 du /acre).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission finds there is not any
anticipated significant adverse effects to be caused by this change to the General
Plan, and recommends to the City Council that a Negative Declaration of Environmental
Impact be filed for General Plan Amendment 83 -6.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of December, 1983, upon the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioner's Saathoff, Dominguez, Washburn, Barnhart and
Chairman Steed.
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTENTIONS: None
mes W. Steed, Chairman, Lake
Elsinore Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Z�L �4�
Linda Grindstaff, P1 ing
Commission Secreta