Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-23-2001- City Council MinutesMINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 2001 :~:~~~~~~~*:~*:~~~~:~:~~~*:~~~:~~:~~~:~~x:~~*~*~~:~~*~~~:~~~:~~*:~~~*~~~*~:~~~~~*~ CALL TO ORDER The Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor Schiffner at 7:05 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Community Services Director Sapp. INVOCATION The Invocation was provided by Pastor Chuck Aden - Shepard of Life Lutheran Church. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BRINLEY, KELLEY, METZE, PAPE, SCHIFFNER NONE Also present were: City Manager Watenpaugh, City Attorney Leibold, Administrative Services Director Boone, Community Development Director Brady, Community Services Director Sapp, Fire Chief Seabert, Police Chief Walsh, City Engineer O'Donnell, Information/Communications Manager Dennis, Recreation & Tourism Manager Edelbrock, City Treasurer Ferro and City CIerWHuman Resources Director Kasad. PRESENTATIONS None. PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS A request was received to address Item No. 4, and deferred to that discussion. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS The following item was pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion and consideration: Item No. 4. PAGE TWO - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 2001 MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY KELLEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. The following Minutes were approved: a. City Council/Redevelopment Agency Study Session - December 26, 2000. b. Regular City Council Meeting - December 26, 2000. c. City Council/Redevelopment Agency Study Session - January 9, 2001. d. Regular City Council Meeting - January 9, 2001. (F:44.4) The following Minutes were received and ordered filed: e. Planning Commission Meeting - December 20, 2000. (F:60.3) f. Design Review Commission Meeting - December 20, 2000. (F:60.4) 2. Ratified Warrant List for January 12, 2001. (F:123) Rejected and referred to Claims Administrator for handing the Claims Against City submitted on behalf of Cubie Williams (CL #2001-O1a), Prince Dortch Sr. (CL #2001-O1b), Damon Oaties/Rameaka Oaties (CL #2001-O1c) and Donald Blaskovich (CL #2001-02). (F:52.2) Approved the Fire Protection Agreement with the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2000/2001, and authorized the Mayor to sign. (F:68.1)(X:127.3) 6. Adopted Resolution of Intention No. 2001-01, setting public hearing for February 13, 2001, to Vacate a Portion of Old Collier Road and Sanford Road. (F:10.1) RESOLUTION NO. 2001-O1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF "OLD" COLLIER AVENUE AND SANFORD AVENUE AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. PUBI,IC HEARINGS 21. Tentative Tract Map No. 29811 (Pardee Construction). (F:160.2) Mayor Schiffner opened the public hearing at 7:10 p.m. City Manager Watenpaugh introduced this item. Community Development Director Brady detailed the proposed project and PAGE THREE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 2001 noted that it was originally part of a larger parcel map. He identified the location for placement of this proposal and detailed the proposed school sites in relationship to this project. Mayor Schiffner asked those persons interested in this item to speak. The following person spoke: Bill Tucker, 740 Acacia, indicated that he was not opposed to the proposed project, but expressed concern with the additional traffic impacts on existing gridlock on Railroad Canyon Road. Councilman Pape had no comments. Councilman Metze noted that the applicant had agreed to all proposed conditions at the Planning Commission Meeting; and commented that this was an extension of prior actions by the City Council. Councilwoman Kelley commented that there would be a Homeowners Association which will be responsible for maintaining the common areas. Mayor Pro Tem Brinley inquired if the issues related to Homeowners Association had been resolved. Community Development Director Brady confirmed and explained that the Homeowners Association would be responsible for all common areas within the tract. Mayor Schiffner had no comments. Hearing no additional comments, Mayor Schiffner closed the Public Hearing at 7:15 p.m. MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY KELLEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29811 BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Findings The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). 2. The effects this project is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources have been considered and balanced. 3. The design of the subdivision provides to the greatest extent possible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision PAGE FOUR - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 2001 (Government Code Section 66412.3). 4. Environmental Impact Report No. 88-1 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and analyzes environmental effects of Tentative Tract Map 29811. EIR No. 88-01 provides adequate environmental clearance and analysis for the proposed subdivision. Conditions of Approval PLANNING DIVISION 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 29811 will expire two (2) years from date of approval unless within that period of time a final map has been filed with the County Recorder, or an e~ension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 29811 shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 16 unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 3. A maintenance easement shall be established for rear yard slopes that exceed 15 feet in vertical height, as specified in the "General Notes" for Tentative Tract Map No. 29811. The maintenance easement will be dedicated to and maintained by the Homeowner's Association. 4. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Tentative Tract Map No. 29811, which action is bought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and/or 6649937, and Public Resources Code Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully with the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, or proceeding, the Applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 5. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots shall be provided, per City Ordinance. 6. A Homeowners Association shall be established. The HOA shall manage and impose fees to maintain all slopes or common areas, open space, private drainage facilities, firebreaks, habitat areas, private recreational facilities and grounds, private streets and any other common amenities. This association shall be established subject to current State laws and be subject to the approval of the City Attorney and Community Development Director who shall review PAGE FIVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 2001 all CC & R's and rules for their adequacy and completeness. The City Attorney shall review CC & R's, homeowners association documents and all documents to convey title to the homeowners association. 7. All slopes exceeding 15 feet in vertical height shall be maintained by the Homeowner's Association. s. All future development shall comply with the development standards contained in the Cottonwood Hills Specific Plan. Those standards not addressed in the Cottonwood Hills Specific Plan will revert to the City Municipal Code in effect at the time future development is proposed for actual construction. 9. The City's Noise Ordinance must be met during all site preparation activity. 10. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Designee prior to final map approvaL 11. Applicant shall bond for all public improvements and grading for subject development as required by the City Engineer. a) Bonding shall be done by phases and not by final maps(s) on grading. b)Bonding shall be done by final map(s) for all other improvements. 12. Pay all applicable fees including park fees as stated in the development agreement prior to issuance of building permits. 13. Prior to final map approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 29811, the improvements specified herein and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council shall be installed, or the bonds and agreement for said improvements, shall be submitted to the City for approval by the City Engineer, and all other stated conditions shall be complied with. 14. Prior to Final Tract Map approval, provide drainage acceptance letters from adjacent property owners to be approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney and recorded. 15. All of the improvements shall be designed by developer's Civil Engineer to the specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore. 16. Comply with all conditions of the Riverside County Fire Department. Provide _ fire buffer zones around the west side of tract boundary and landscape for fire ; retardant and erosion control prior to issuance of first Certificate of Occupancy. 17. Applicant must meet all requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). 18. The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer for each lot within the subdivision. No service laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and shall be delineated on engineering sewer plans and profiles for submittal to the EVMWD. PAGE SIX - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 2001 19. The developer shall submit plans to Southern California Edison for a layout of the street lighting system. The cost of street lighting, installation as well as energy charges shall be the responsibility of the developer and/or the association. Said plans shall be approved by the City and shall be installed in accordance with the City Standards. 20. Meet all requirements of the providing electric utility company. 21. Meet all requirements of the providing gas utility company. z2. Meet all requirements of the providing telephone utility company. 23. All trailers used during construction, mailboxes and signage shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to installation. 24. Subdivider shall record CC & R's for the project prohibiting on-street storage of boats, motor homes, trailers and trucks over one (1) ton capacity. It shall also record a reciprocal parking and access agreement in fa~or of all lots within the subdivision. CC & R's shall be subject to the approval of the Community ~ Development Director, or his designee, prior to recordation of any deeds or final map. CC& R's shall be recorded prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy for the units when developed in the future. 25. Any alterations to the topography, ground surface, or any other site preparation activity will require appropriate Grading City permits. A Geologic Soils Report with associated recommendations will be required for grading permit approval, and all grading must meet the City's Grading Ordinance, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and the Planning Division. Analysis of impacts of fills and cuts greater than sixty-feet (60') shall be provided. Interim and permanent erosion control measures are required. The applicant shall bond 100% for material and labor for one (1) year for erosion control landscaping at the time the site is rough graded. 26. All development associated with this map requires separate Design Review approval. 27. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permit, subdivider shall sign and complete an"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department. 28. All project mitigation measures, listed within the certified EIR for the project, shall be incorporated into project design and development. 29. The applicant shall pay applicable fees and obtain proper clearance from the Lake Elsinore iJnified School District (LEUSD) prior to issuance of building permits. PAGE SEVEN - CITY COiTNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 2001 ENGINEERING DIVISION 30. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of ~ development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior ~ - to final map approval. 31. Tentative tract 29811 shall be subject to all applicable conditions of approval of tentative tract 23848 (Cottonwood Hills Development). 32. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 1634, Resolution 85-26). 33. Submit a"Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Department from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to final map approval. 34. Construct all public works improvements per approved street plans (LEMC 12.04). Plans must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to final map approval (LEMC 16.34). 35. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). 36. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds prior to final map approval. 37. Desirable grade far local streets is 9%. The maximum grade of 15% should only be used because of design constraints. 38. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Department for construction of public works improvements (LEMC 12.08 and Resolution 83-78). 39. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8'h" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Department before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 40. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. 41. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. 42. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. PAGE EIGHT - CITY COiTNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 2001 43. Developer shall install blue reflective pavement markers in the street at all fire hydrant locations. 44. Applicant shall submit a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the tract to be approved prior to final map approval. All traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. This includes No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract. 45. All improvement plans and tract maps shall be digitized. At Certificate of Occupancy applicant shall submit tapes and/or discs which are compatible with City's ARC Info/GIS or developer to pay $300 per sheet for City digitizing. 46. All utilities except electrical over 12 kV shall be placed underground, as approved by the serving utility. 47. If grading exceeds 50 cubic yards, grading plans shall be prepared by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer and approved prior to grading permit issuance. Prior to any grading, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit and post appropriate security. 4s. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 49. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion controL All manufactured slopes greater than 30 ft. in height shall be contoured. 50. Individual lot drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. SI.On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions". 52. The debris basin shown as not a part should be designated as a lettered lot. 53. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 54. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineer prior to approval of final map. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion caused by development of site and diversion of drainage. 55. All drainage facilities in this tract shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. PAGE NINE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 2001 56. Storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately stenciled to prevent illegally dumping in the drain system; the wording and stencil shall be approved by the city engineer. - 57.10-year storxn runoff should be contained within the curb and the 100-year storm runoff should be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria are exceeded, drainage facilities should be installed. 58. Roof and yard drains will not be allowed to outlet through cuts in the street curb. 59. Applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a Notice of Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program with a storm water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes BNIl''s that will be implemented for landscaping, the application of herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers. 60. Intersection site distance shall meet the design criteria of the CALTRANS Design Manual (particular attention should be taken for intersections on the inside of curves). If site distance can be obstructed, a special limited use easement must be recarded to limit the slope, type of landscaping and wall placement. 61. Intersecting streets on the inside radius of a curve will only be permitted when adequate sight distance is verified by a registered civil engineer. 62. Cottonwood Hills Rd. from Railroad Canyon Rd. to Lost Rd. and Lost Road south of Cottonwood Hills Rd. shall be improved as each phase is constructed as specified in the letter of March 30, 1999 from Project Design Consultants. 63. Local streets shall have a minimum of a 60-ft. right-of -way with 40-ft. curb-to- curb. Restricted local streets (cul-de-sacs) shall have a minimum of a 56-ft. right-of-way with 36-ft. curb-to-curb. 64. Developer shall install one benchmark in accordance with Riverside County Standards and at a location to be determined by the City Engineer. 65. No residential lot shall front and access shall be restricted on Lost Road and so noted on the final map. 66. Applicant shall record CC & R's for the tract prohibiting on-street storage of boats, motorhomes, trailer, and trucks over one-ton capacity, roof mounted or front yard microwave satellite antennas. The CC & R's shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to recordation of final map. 67. Applicant shall provide a homeowner's association with CC & R's for maintenance of the HOA slope easements designated on the maps. PAGE TEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 2001 68. The residential lots adjacent to large open space lots shall be have an area in the open space lot designated as a fuel modification zone for a firebreak to be maintained by a homeowner's association. 69. The developer shall comply with a Cultural Resources Mitigation Program prior to final map approval or grading permit (whichever occurs first). The program shall be based on site evaluations by qualified archaeologists and historians to establish significance of each site and a detailed plan for appropriate mitigation, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. Compensation for disturbances to cultural resources shall be provided by a program to recover information from sites that shall be monitored by archaeologists where required by the EIR. In the event significant historic material is discovered, it shall be removed before grading occurs. 70. All waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or other phases of the construction shall be disposed of at appropriate recycling centers. The applicant should contract with CR&R Inc. for recycling and storage container services, but the applicant may use the services of another recycling vendor. Another recycling vendor, other than CR&R Inc., cannot charge the applicant for bin rental or solid waste disposal. If the applicant is not using CR&R Inc. for recycling services and the recycling material is either sold or donated to another vendor, the applicant shall supply proof of debris disposal at a recycling center, including verification of tonnage by certified weighmaster tickets. 71. Developer shall contribute 20 percent of the cost for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Lost Road & Cedarhill Lane payable at final map if the signal is operational at recordation of the map. 31. League Of California Cities Grassroots Coordinator Netwark Program. (F:108.8) City Manager Watenpaugh highlighted this item; and explained that it was intended to promote better information and coordination on statewide issues. He further explained that each participating City would contribute an extra share of funding toward 14 additional positions within the State. He advised that the State would be broken up into 16 areas, with a facilitator for each area to assist with coordination and communication. He noted that the Inland Empire area would have two representatives, while areas like Los Angeles and the Monterey Peninsula would have three representatives, based on population. He advised that the City contribution would be just under $3,500 annually. He noted that in discussions with the City Manager's Division and Policy Committees, there were several comments that this would receive better support if it included a sunset clause like five years, in the event it doesn't function as proposed. He stressed that it was not intended to replace local lobbying efforts, but rather to improve communication factors, and give better services to local areas beyond their representation in Sacramento. He indicated that staff was recommending PAGE ELEVEN -. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 2001 approval of participation, but clarified that it would still require a 2/3rds vote of the participating cities for the program to be implemented. He noted that Mayor Schiffner and Councilman Pape had already been involved in League discussions on the topic. Councilman Pape noted that over the years, the League had tried to be an advocate for cities and promote their legislative issues; however this had not always been as successful as it could be. He explained that through encouragement from League members, they were seeking to improve the effectiveness. He suggested giving this proposal an opportunity, and seeing how it works, with the option of changes and amendments at a later date. He noted that plans were already in place for 2002 to work toward regaining some of the ERAF funds taken in the 1980's. He suggested that this was a good foundation for that effort, as well as a good grassroots effort to interact with local legislators and keep cities better informed. He expressed his support for this proposal. Councilman Metze concurred with Councilman Pape and suggested that it would help to bring the League into the new millenium and provide a new way to deal with Sacramento. He noted past discussions of returning control to local government and stressed that cities, water boards and school boards are the purest, most direct forms of government. He stressed that as an elected official, he is seen on the local cable channel and held accountable for the decisions he makes; and that other legislators are not under the same scrutiny, even if they try to take away local government control. He further stressed that local government was best equipped to deal with local issues; and suggested that this proposal would be a step in the right direction. Councilwoman Kelley inquired how many other cities had committed to this program so far. Councilman Pape indicated that he had heard the program presented at three meetings in the last two weeks, and the only areas of concern had been the sunset clauses. He noted that it was just being presented, but would be considered by several cities in the near future. Councilwoman Kelley noted that the League had been seeking ways to be more effective and she had no problem with the proposal. Mayor Pro Tem Brinley concurred with the other Councilmembers that the League had lost some of its clout over the last few years and needed to revamp itself. She suggested that this concern had been emphasized by the last tax surplus money, which was not returned to the cities. She expressed support for the proposal, but questioned the sunset clause. City Manager Watenpaugh stressed that the decision would be made by the Board of Directors of the League, if a majority of the cities show support of the program. He noted that the sunset clause could be included in a Resolution of Support, and voting could either occur by mailed ballot or at the annual conference in September. He clarified that the process was just getting started. Mayor Pro Tem Brinley noted that this type of approach had been discussed for 2-1/2 or 3 years, since Sacramento turned a deaf ear to cities. PAGE TWELVE - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 2001 She indicated she was in favor of this program. Mayor Schiffner noted a comparison of monies spent by lobbying groups vs. other agencies; and suggested that the proposed increase was small, if it was to be earmarked for coordination with the local areas. He suggested that this was one way to increase the effectiveness of cities, and if it doesn't work out, there may be a need to reevaluate the League. MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY PAPE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO SUPPORT THE GRASSROOTS COORDINATOR NETWORK PROGRAM WITH THE INCLUSION OF A SUNSET CLAUSE, NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS. 32. Riverside Countv Hvdro-Pumped Stora~:e Power Line Committee. (F:140.1)(X:59.1) City Manager Watenpaugh advised that this Committee was being established by Supervisor Buster to obtain input from the local community, regarding the proposed project and the power line locations. He indicated that Supervisor Buster had requested that the Council appoint two citizen representatives, to work with 15 other representatives from other areas. He noted that the first meeting had been postponed, due to a request from the Water District and Enron. Mayor Schiffner noted that there had been discussion of the methods of making these appointments and indicated that each person should nominate one person; then each Councilmember would vote for two, and the two highest vote recipients would be appointed. Nominations Councilman Metze passed. Mayor Pro Tem Brinley nominated Ron La Pere, former Chairman of the Palm Tree Committee, noting that he does his homework, represents the City well and is a good team member. Mayor Schiffner nominated Pete Dawson, noting that he was one of the people with the biggest interest in the welfare of the Lake and the community in which he lives. Councilwoman Kelley nominated Jim Bolton, noting that he was a resident of the County area, works for Pacific Century Homes, and is very interested in this project. Councilman Pape noted that the Council had already made appointments to one committee. He noted that this committee would have 17 members, and suggested that offering the City two appointments was just a political move on the part of Supervisor Buster. He suggested that the City form its own committee to form an opinion on what is going on. He noted that Enron and PAGE THIRTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 2001 the Water District had a committee, the Supervisor would have a committee, and it might be better for the City to have its own committee form input. He suggested that two members would be of no benefit on such a large committee. Mayor Schiffner noted that he was not sure either of the committees would become active. City Manager Watenpaugh indicated that he had not had a chance to talk with the General Manager of the Water District, but there had been a request from the Water District to consider consolidating the two committees. Councilman Pape suggested taking a wait and see stance. Mayor Schiffner suggested being part of the project, and noted that the committees are informational at this time. Councilman Metze nominated George Rivera, noting that if the City had only two appointments, they should be residents of the City, since the other 15 were from the County. Mayor Pro Tem Brinley inquired if Mr. Dawson was already on Supervisor Buster's Committee. Mr. Dawson indicated that he thought he was, but it appeared he was not. Mayor Schiffner expressed understanding of Councilman Metze's comments, but indicated that he did not agree. He indicated that he believed that in this case, Mr. Dawson had a prime interest in the Lake and has been more active in the area. Councilman Metze voted for George Rivera and Ron LaPere. Mayor Pro Tem Brinley voted for Ron LaPere and Jim Bolton. Mayor Schiffner voted for Ron LaPere and Pete Dawson. Councilwoman Kelley voted for Jim Bolton and Pete Dawson. Councilman Pape voted for George Rivera and Ron LaPere. Yt was noted that there was a tie between Mr. Bolton, Mr. Dawson and Mr. Rivera, so a second vote was called for. Councilman Pape voted for George Rivera. Councilwoman Kelley voted for Jim Bolton. Mayor Schiffner voted for Pete Dawson. Councilman Metze voted for George Rivera. Mayor Pro Tem Brinley voted for Gearge Rivera. Ron LaPere and George Rivera were declared the City Council appointees to Supervisor Buster°s Hydro-Pumped Storage Power Line Committee. ITEMS PULLEI2 FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR 4. South County Workforce Investment Act - License A~reement For Use Of PAGE FOURTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 2001 Librarv Building. (F:68.1) City Manager Watenpaugh highlighted this request. Community Services Director Sapp explained the proposal which was submitted for a grant of $600,000 to provide a training mechanism for youths, ages 14 to 21, allowing 50 to 60 students to prepare for the workforce annually. Diana Schneider, representing the Riverside County Office of Education advised that this project will have a significant effect on the youth and grateful to the City for allowing them to participate. She detailed the services they will be providing, including career counseling guidance, occupational training, etc. She noted that they will offer space to local entities for providing training and the program will be open to some of the students who would not normally be eligible. She explained that the focus is for special education and foster youth students, to bring them up to speed, finish school, obtain job training and get jobs. Councilman Pape noted page five regarding the issues of getting the building in order; and commented that his understanding is that the building is in good order, except for a warped door, which would be the only real expense. He indicated that he was a bit concerned with the two consecutive, two-year periods for extension; and suggested that one extension might be better. Ms. Schneider noted that they are planning to do $30,000 in upgrades, in exchange for the use of the building. She advised that they will also be bringing in computers, phone systems, lab equipment and office equipment to make it a functional center. Councilwoman Kelley inquired how the program would be advertised and who would be eligible. Ms. Schneider indicated that they were very interested in getting the word out to the kids who are out of school; and stressed the requirement that they serve 30% dropouts. Ms. Schneider further explained that they were doing extensive outreach to get to those students and those dropping out, starting with community orientations. Councilwoman Kelley questioned the occupational training and if businesses in the community were needed to assist them. Ms. Schneider indicated that they would hire teachers or entertain business people willing to come in and discuss employment opportunities and internships in the community. Mayor Pro Tem Brinley inquired if they would be working with Ortega High School and if they would be attending the EDC meeting for access to different employers who might be able to assist with jobs in a learning environment. Ms. Schneider indicated that she had worked with EDC in the past as the manager of the JTPA program; and commented that she was happy to connect with any resources available in the community. Mayor Pro Tem Brinley inquired if they were in contact with other sources in the County. Ms. Schneider noted that students in group or foster homes were automatically eligible to participate. She also noted that they would be providing other services to the community, such as the compilation of a PAGE FIFTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 2001 resource directory of youth services in the community. , Mayor Pro Tem Brinley encouraged them to contact the EDC via Tammy Walsh. Councilman Metze commented that this sounded like a great program and liked the location. He noted that the City was also getting space for a tiny tots program in the same building. Community Services Director Sapp advised that the tiny tot program will serve 3, 4 and 5 year olds; and explained that the Office of Education would provide the space and City staff will provide the program. He noted that Insurance requirements should be added to the proposed agreement and would be so revised. Mayor Schiffner noted that there were a number of other suggestions for use of the building, however this was the first to come to the Council. He indicated that it would be very valuable to the community and he was not concerned about the time issue. City Manager Watenpaugh indicated that this was a great outreach program to tie into businesses and the school district. MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY PAPE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED AGREEMENT FOR FOUR YEARS WITH A TWO YEAR EXTENSION. (It was later clarified that 4his should have been a two year agreement with the option of one two year extension.) THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECESS~D AT 7:47 P.M. THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED AT 7:49 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Chris Hyland, 15191 Wavecrest, indicated that she was turning in comments regarding the Alberhill EIR, and noted that the material had been reviewed by a qualified representative, prior to submittal. She noted that she had been told that there was no agreement with the developer for this project, and commented that staff had worked for hours on this project. She expressed hopes that tax money was not being expended and suggested that staff should not be working on the project. She noted her previous comments regarding the Stadium Lease and expressed wonder as to whether the new people had ever read the Grand Jury report on the Stadium project. She suggested that the same thing would happen with the racetrack, and it would end in sawdust and lawsuits. She thanked everyone who signed her petition in opposition to the racetrack, and encouraged residents to contact City Hall with their opinions. Barbara Cady, 32524 Wildomar Road, announced that there would be a Friends of the Library Book Sale on February 3`d; and noted the need for assistance on ]February 2°d to get it set up. She noted that at this time there was an event underway involving a Mountain Musher and his huskies at the Library. She addressed a recent article in the Los Angeles Times Newspaper, noting that she PAGE SIXTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 2001 took offense with what was said about the City's concert series; and stressed the positive nature of the events. She suggested that this article was irresponsible reporting, and noted it carried Mr. Reinbold's negative tone. She indicated that Lake Elsinore was a beautiful city with a natural lake, with boats on it; and the reporter had gone no further than "The Wreck" bar to obtain information. She further indicated that Main Street is beautiful and the people who do the most work, don't get any of the credit, but rather get trashed all the time. She noted that Mr. Dawson had the contact information on the Los Angeles Times available if inembers of the community wanted to respond. She stressed the positive treatment provided by the Council, and the beauty of the community. Peter I~awson, 18010 Grand Avenue, thanked the Council for their consideration for a committee appointment; but noted that they selected two fine representatives. He indicated that he was insensed by the Los Angeles Times article; noting specific quotes from the article. He indicated that Lake Elsinore didn't deserve the comments it received and noted that he could not imagine local people helping to bad mouth the Community in Los Angeles. He then addressed LEMSAR and noted that they had been assisting boaters in trouble for many years. He indicated that he had been appointed to speak on behalf of LEMSAR, to the Council on a monthly basis. He further indicated that there was not too much activity on the Lake in Decmeber, however they did 401 hours of service to the community including 8 hours of lake testing and twb Sheriff call-outs for towing. Leroy Tucker, 3532 Cherry Blossom, noted that he had complained about the sound system many times and there was now a new system. He requested that everyone use the microphones so they could be heard. He indicated that he read about the campground in the newspaper and it seemed like the ball stadium; noting that it was something that the City couldn't stop dealing with. He inquired whether other companies had been offered the opportunity to bid on future operations. He suggested that a 75 year contract would be way out of line and suggested that 12 years should be adequate; and the City should be able to review the operations annually. He then addressed the legal counsel used for Initiative effort and suggested the release of funds to assist with legal fees for the people against the racetrack. He indicated that he liked the overall project, except for the racetrack. He expressed concern with letting outsiders say what the community needed. Keith Cook, 16496 Nectarine Way, noted that he had listened to the last four City Council meetings and the comments about the racetrack; and did some research. He noted the additional activities which would be taking place and noted that the EIR addressed a maximum of 12 weeks of events. He further noted that the noise would exceed the City's standards and suggested that the sound barrier and wall would not be adequate. He urged the Council to proceed with extreme caution, to protect the quality of life. Bill Tucker, 740 Acacia, indicated that he got a ticket in the Avenues for storage of his mail jeep. He indicated that it was not in bad shape and did not look as bad as the people who left trash cans out all week long. He questioned what he should do with his jeep, and indicated that he would put it in the garage, but his boat was PAGE SEVENTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINiJTES - JANUARY 23, 2001 stored there. He then addressed the Los Angeles Times article and indicated that it ticked him off, and the people that criticize the community should be,thrown out. Joyce Allen, 29747 Wise Street, indicated that she and her husband were artists and had opened a gallery, Bella Custom Frame Gallery, in Lake Elsinore. She stressed their interest in providing a public forum for local artistic talent. She detailed the background of the first artist scheduled to present in the gallery, who is a three year resident of Lake Elsinore. She invited the community to attend a reception on Saturday, January 27"' from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m.; and encouraged attendance. Woody Woodward, 29108 Sunswept, indicated that he hated the article in the Los Angeles Times, however he was trying to not let negatives bother him. He addressed the signatures he had presented to the City, noting that the vast majority were from Lake Elsinore, but the others were from people who would come to the facility to spend their money. He presented additional signatures noting they were obtained from the businesses in the City. He also presented an article regarding a drag strip to be built in Banning, which was anticipated to generate $35 million in revenues annually. He suggested that such a project would be a good boost for the City. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS City Manager Watenpaugh commented on the following: 1) Pointed out that the Alberhill Project is a specific plan proposal from the property owner and they were paying for the staff and attorney _ costs associated with the project. He stressed that the property owner had the right to propose an amendment if they desired, however the issue had not come to the Council. He clarified the EIR and hearing processes and indicated that all input is welcome for consideration. He stressed that the Council would not make a decision until it is presented to them for a decision. 2) Noted that the Council recently recognized LEMSAR for their efforts; and expressed gratitude for their support of the Sheriff s Department and the community. 3) Indicated that with regard to the Campground, the City sent out a Request for Proposals to fifty-five companies, with only three being , returned. He noted that the City had not yet entered into an agreement; and that any kind of long-term agreement would require strong commitments to the community. 4) Noted that the Initiative received about 1,100 signature, not 11,000; but indicated that the City could not bring it forward. : 5) Addressed Mr. Tuclcer regarding his Jeep and indicated that the citation was part of the Neighborhood Enhancement Program. He apologized for the inconvenience, but stressed that it was part of the PAGE EIGHTEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 2001 program. He explained that the program was intended to help with clean-up, after some of the recent improvements; and serve as a joint effort to improve the community. 6) Noted a recent article about the Enhancement Program, which in error stated that residents could put out trash on Saturday for pick-up. He clarified that this was only within the designated area; however the program would be moving to other areas. 7) Indicated that the Council had requested that staff, at the request of Governor Davis reduce energy usage; and has turned off lights and computers where possible. He explained that the target was to conserve 7% of the normal usage; and noted the impact on San Diego Gas & Electric customers, which had already been seen on the bills. He stressed that everyone needed to work to resolve the shortages. 8) Noted that the Council and staff were reluctant to see a staff person leave, but pleased with her promotion. He announced that Fire Chief Brenda Seabert had been promoted to the position of Regional Training Officer for Southern California and would be leaving on February ls~. He noted that she would be missed and congratulated her on behalf of the Council and Staff. CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS City Attorney Leibold indicated that there were no Closed Session items. She requested with regard to Item # 4 on the South County Workforce Investment Act License Agreement. She inquired if the intent was approval of a two-year agreement with one two-year extension option. The Council confirmed this was the intent. COMMITTEE REPORTS No reports. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Metze commented on the following: 1) Thanked the City Manager for addressing the free trash issue, as he had received questions. 2) Addressed Mr. Dawson and Mr. Bolton and explained that he felt the representatives to Supervisar Buster's Committee should be City residents because he was elected by City residents; and ultimately City residents might take a different look at the project than County residents. He stressed that he has the utmost respect for both Mr. Dawson and Mr. Bolton. PAGE NINETEEN - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 2001 Councilman Pape commented on the following: 1) Concurred with Councilman Metze regarding City representation on the Supervisor's Committee. 2) Welcomed Bella Custom Framing to the Community and noted that they had done some framing for him in the past. He noted that he would be out of town this weekend, but would stop by to see the artwork. He noted that they had a shop in a neighboring community and were already discussing another location. 3) Noted that it was nice to watch the peaceful transfer of power at the Chamber of Commerce Installation Dinner and expressed his best wishes to the new officers. Mayor Pro Tem Brinley commented on the following: 1) Welcomed Bella Custom Framing to the community and reiterated that they would have a reception on Saturday from 11 to 1; and detailed the normal business hours. She invited the community to ca11471-1144 for more information and wished the business the best of luck. She noted the availability of flyers with a 10% coupon. 2) Congratulated Chief Seabert on her good work in the City, noting that she was always receptive and helpful. She wished her well in her new endeavor. 3) Congratulated new Chamber President Jim Barrett of American Printing; noting that he is a good community member and businessman. She announced that Tammy Walsh was now the 1 S` Vice President and Jack McColley was the 2"d Vice-President; and she felt they would work well with the City. Councilwoman Kelley commented on the following: 1) Congratulated Chief Seabert and indicated she would be missed. 2) Welcomed Bella Custom Framing. 3) Congratulated the new Chamber Board. 1Vlayor Schiffner commented on the following: 1) Congratulated Chief Seabert on her promotion, noting he was sorry to see her go, but proud of her progress. 2) Noted the unfortunate Los Angeles Times article, and commented on the contrast of the elegant Chamber of Commerce event to the negative story. He indicated that he wished the writer could have PAGE TWENTY - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 2001 attended the Chamber Installation. He indicated that the City did not ignore the article, and he had written a letter inviting them to come to Lake Elsinore to talk with business leaders, educators, etc. and see the other side of the picture. CLOSED SESSION None. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY BRINLEY, SECONDED BY METZE AND CARRIED BY UNA1vIMOUS VOTE TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 8:25 P.M. R~OBERT L. SG`I CITY OF LAKE CITY CLERK MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE