HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-02-2000 City Council Study SessionMINUTES
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
CTTY OF LAKE ELSINORE
130 50UTH MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2000
..............................................................................,
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Brinley called the City Council Study Session to order at 3:08 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Brinley led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KELLEY, PAPE,
SCHIFFNER, BRINLEY
ABSENT; COUNCILMEMBERS: METZE
Also present were: City Manager Watenpaugh, Assistant City Manager Best,
Administrative Services Director Boone, Community Development Director
Brady, Community Services Director Sapp, Information/ Communications
Manager Dennis, Lake Operations Manger Kilroy, City Treasurer Ferro and
Deputy City Clerk Bryning.
DISCUSSION ITEM
L Lake Elsinore Advanced Pump Stora~Project. (F:92.7)
City Manager Watenpaugh noted that the team from Enron would be
presenting a Power point program and asked that all questions be held until
the end of the presentation. He introduced Rob Bakondy of Enron.
Rob Bakondy of Enron North America, asked each member of the team to
introduce themselves as follows: Rex Wait, Engineer from The Nevada
Hydro Company, Inc.; Kathy Russeth, Public Relations Consultant for
Enron; Peter Lewandowski, President of The Nevada Hydro Company, Inc
and the environmentalist; Roger Shintaku, Civil Engineer Consultant for
Enron and the liaison for the regulatory agencies; Dan Greenwell with The
Nevada Hydro Company, Inc.; and Jack Cahil Consultant with The Nevada
Hydro Company, Ina
Mr. Bakondy presented a personal background and his qualifications relating
to his employment with Enron. He then presented an overview of the
history of Enron and their involvement in the corporate industry. Mr. Wait
stated that the reason he had included the facts regarding Lake Elsinore was
for Council benefit. He noted that it was necessary to provide this
information to other agencies. He explained that one of their jobs through
the licensing process was to start at the Federal Government level and work
PAGE TWO - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 2, 2000
down to the local agencies. He stated that it was his job to let the various
agencies know what they are doing and what the project will include. He
presented an overview of the history of the project as follows:
PROJECT HISTORY
• Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District "Districts"
- EVMWD, original application for FERC; 3/92
• Application was pre-empted by adjoining cities:
*Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Colton & Riverside "Cities" 2/92
*"Cities"& "District" concluded that EVMWD develop project
*"Cities" surrendered their application for license; 9/94
• EVMWD entered into an agreement with the Hydro Company in early
'97 to develop project
• The Hydro Company and EVMWD entered into agreements with
Enron North America to pursue project development
• LEAPS, LLC is the project owner and developer, and is a 100%
owned subsidiary of Enron North America
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
• Nominal 500 MW power project utilizing pump turbine machines
• Head lake (upper reservoir residents in Clevland National Forest,
Morrell Canyon or Decker Canyon, South Fork
• Lake Elsinore to be the lower reservoir with penstock twuiels for
inlet/outfall
• Power plan ca~ern - 240 feet below the surface of Lake Elsinore
• Electrical switchyard to be located on surface adjacent to power plan
building with interconnection to Southern California Cities
• Advanced pump storage plan:
* Pump lower reservoir water to upper reservoir during off peak
energy periods
* Return water through the turbines and generate power during
peak energy periods.
TECHNOLOGY/EQUIPMENT
' • Utilize Voith Siemens pump turbines
• Each unit designed to pump water or generate power, coupled with
225,000 HP generators; 167 Mw, each pump turbine @ 13.8 KV,
(total of three (3) units)
• penstocks, each 14 ft. Diameter
• Power Plan:
* Total head at turbines = 1600 ft.
* Lake will fluctuate 18" max. (over 16 hour period)
• Water system flow:
* Head Lake, Morrell is at 2880 ft. elevation and will hold =
5,500 acre ft.
PAGE THREE - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 2, 2000
* Lower reservoir, Lake Elsinore is at 1249 ft. elevation and
contains = 68,000 acre feet
• Control & Monitoring
* Innovative, state of the art electronics, PLC
* Interact with California lSO via a direct communications
links
* Continuous online status, available for trading functions
Mr. Bakondy indicated that the schedule provided was just an overview of a
much larger schedule. He noted that it was an aggressive schedule and it
was hoped that they would be efficient enough to secure a conditional permit
from FERC by the end of December of 2001. Mayor Brinley asked for the
definition of FERC. Mr. Bakondy advised that FERC stands for Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission. He presented the proposed schedule as
follows:
5CHEDULE
• 9/15/00; submit preliminary application to FERC
• 10/26/00; initial consultation package to all agencies
• 12/O1/00; all agencies receive official permitting package
• 12/O1/00; select equipment supplier
• 12/15/00; complete land easements and consents
• 2/25/O1; select EPC contractor
• 10/30/O1 finalize design
• 11/10/O1; select lender consortium
• 12/31/O1; complete financial close
• 1/02/02; start construction
• 9/15/04; start of commercial operations
Peter Lewandowski, President of The Nevada Hydro Company, Inc.
presented an averview of the benefits of the project as follows:
BENEFITS
• Provide much needed electricity to San Diego and Los Angeles without
creating air emissions.
• Provide reservoir in Cleveland National Forest for fire fighting.
• Provide aeration of Lake Elsinore, which will result in improvement of
Lake biology and quality of Lake recreation.
• Provide economic city growth during & after construction.
Mr. Bakondy stated that Enron is a company that believes in community
involvement and noted several projects facilitated by Enron. He assured
Council that Enron looks for local people to work on the project, both during
construction and later to operate the facility.
PAGE FOUR - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 2, 2000
Kathy Russeth, Public Relations Consultant for Enron, noted that no project
is risk free and outlined the risks and mitigation of those risks as follows:
RISKS
• Community awareness and public relations
• California agencies review process
• FERC approval process
• Civil Consttuction
MITIGANTS
• Early education, interactive discussions, design considerations
• Create a sense of urgency, provide support as necessary for fast responses
• Provide approved subcontractor to FERC to help with permit writing, use
alternative procedures
• Provide community with an agreed upon construction schedule of
workable hours for certain functions
Mr. Bakondy stated that the project would not move forward without the
community, area and City support. He noted that FERC requires community
involvement. Mayor Brinley asked if FERC was the lead agency for this
project, and whether their approval was necessary for the project to move
farward. Mr. Bakondy confirmed. He stated that they have been in contact
with the U.S. Forest Service and had a very positive meeting. Mr. Bakondy
stated that they would be available to answer any questions.
Mayor Brinley clarified that the project would benefit the community as a
whole and would supply jobs to the community. She further clarified that
they would purchase supplies and equipment from local resources if
possible. Mr. Bakondy confirmed. She asked what the project could
contribute to the local economy. Mx. Wait stated that he did not have a
current figure, however in the initial study it was thought the project would
generate approximately $100 million. Mr. Bakondy stated that an
independent consultant was performing economic studies and he would get
back to Council with more accurate figures. Mayor Brinley stated that she
felt that this project would be a real asset to the community for its job
creation. She questioned the water level of the Lake and asked if Enron
would be maintaining the water level of the Lake. Mr. Bakondy stated that
they would. Mayor Brinley asked if they would be providing supplemental
water if needed. Mr. Bakondy stated that they would. She asked if Mr.
Bakondy could provide a figure on the cost of water. She requested
confirmation that Enron would be working with the JPA that was formed
because of Proposition 13 and providing a presentation to them. Mr.
Bakondy confirmed. He stated that they were not present to replace
anything that the JPA had on their plates, however they would supplement
and support. Ms. Russeth indicated that Enron would sign a project labor
PAGE FIVE - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 2, 2000
agreement and they have begun discussions with the 5an Bernardino/
Riverside Building trades and they do build with Union Labor.
Councilwoman Kelley commented that Council was only aware of this
project by what they haee read in the newspapers. She noted that to her
understanding, public relations will be in the forefront and is the initial step
that must be taken. She commented on the bad start the project had with
regard to public relations and asked how they would correct the situation.
She asked how Enron would formulate the Committee and coordinate with
the 5upervisor. Ms. Russeth stated that she has no firm answer at this time,
as she had not met with the Supervisor and had not had the time to share
information with him that has been shared with the City Council today. She
stated that she would be presenting a draft charter and asked that Council
consider appointment of a person by each Councilmember.
Mayor Brinley requested confirmation that Ms. Russeth had an appointment
with Supervisor Buster next week. Ms. Russeth stated that she would be
meeting with the people from Lakeland Village and had scheduled an
appointment with Supervisor Buster, however that appointment had since
been rescinded. She explained that Supervisor Buster had told her that he
would not meet or speak with her personally and if she wished to speak to
him she would have to put it in writing.
Ms. Russeth distributed the Draft copies of the proposed Committee Charter.
Councilwoman Kelley confirmed that it was Enron's committee. Ms.
Russeth stated that it was the Lake Elsinore Advanced Pump Storage
(LEAPS) Public Advisory Committee. Councilwoman Kelley stated that
Enron would be overseeing the Committee and not EVMWD. Ms. Russeth
confirmed.
Ms. Russeth noted the Draft and explained that it would evolve over time.
She stated that she knew that there had been a great deal of criticism of the
fact that there were going to be five members appointed by the City Council.
She stated that the committee would consist of 15 people and any member of
the group is going to have to form a coalition if anything will be
accomplished. She stated that one of the reasons that she chose the five
from the City was because one of the key benefits would be improving the
water quality and level of Lake Elsinore. Mayor Brinley asked if there
would be five members from the Water District as well. Ms. Russeth stated
that there would be no members from the Water District since they are one
of the permitting agencies. She stated that FERC requires that the applicant
put a committee together, however they will not make the choices for that
committee. 5he gave an overview of the various ways to be appointed to the
committee. She stated that the Committee could really make a difference
and would be open to the public. She noted that all they will receive for
their time is dinner at their monthly meeting. Mayor Brinley clarified that
this would be a hands-on committee. Ms. Russeth concurred.
PAGE SIX - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 2, 2000
Councilwoman Kelley asked when Ms. Russeth would want Council to
make appointments. Ms. Russeth stated that she would like to have a first
meeting prior to the end of the year. Mayor Brinley suggested that if the
appointment were made by the last meeting of November, it would be
acceptable. Ms. Russeth concurred.
Councilman Schiffner stated that his only concern would be the aesthetics of
the project upon completion in relation to the power lines. He stated that it
seems to be an interesting project and he looked forward to watching it move
along.
COUNCILMAN METZE ARRIVED AT 3:50 P.M.
Mayor Pro Tem Pape questioned the e~ibits and asked for an explanation
and visual overview of the project.
E~ibits were presented to show an aerial view of the lake and the proposed
reservoir sites.
Councilwoman Kelley asked how much turbulence the process would create.
Mr. Wait stated that the velocity is very slow, 6 feet per second, and when
the water gets to the Lake there will be a diffuser system, which will slow
the velocity even more. He noted that there would not be a rushing sound of
water or swimmers being sucked into the intake.
Peter Lewandowski explained that the best he could explain the diffusion of
the water was that it would be something similar to a french drain. He noted
that the water would be piped to the Lake and would not be discharged in a
single location, but rather in several locations. He noted that the objective
was to minimize sediment, which would be accomplished by percolating at a
very slow rate in a number of areas and oxygenating as much of the Lake as
possible.
Mr. Wait stated that the bulk of the project would be on U.S. Forest Service
property, and noted that it is basically the water flowing underground out
into the Lake that goes through County and City property.
There was general discussion regarding the location of the project and
e~chibits of aerial maps were presented with the location of the pump station
and the proposed reservoirs. They presented the primary and secondary
locations on the e~ibits.
Councilman Schiffner asked for the reason why Morrell Canyon is a
preferred location. Mr. Wait stated that Morrell Canyon is 100 feet higher
than i~ecker Canyon and Morrell Canyon best utilizes the land since it
would entail less property disturbed, since the Canyon is narrower and
deeper. Mr. Lewandowski explained that Decker Canyon is a bowl and does
not really have an artery, which is most conducive to creating a dam. He
PAGE SEVEN - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 2, 2000
further explained that Morrell Canyon is a natural canyon area with
preferred existing topography, which would require a smaller dam and is at a
higher elevation with a more direct penstock pipeline alignment to the pump
station.
There was further discussion regarding the location of Morrell Canyon.
Councilwoman Kelley requested confirmation that the entire facility would
be underground. Mr. Lewandowski confirmed, with the exception of the
two-story building. Mayor Brinley stated that she was under the impression
that there would be towers constructed. Mr. Lewandowski stated that this
would not involve fossil fuel, therefore everything would be underground
with the exception of the two-story building, which would be for
administration.
There was general discussion regarding the turbines and the amount of noise
they would generate. Mr. Bakondy stated that there would be no noise since
the facilities were located underground.
There was general discussion regarding the silt on the Lake bottom and the
intake and outlet of the water. Mr. Lewandowski stated that they are still in
the study process, however that issue has been taken under consideration and
sites will be carefully chosen to minimize any problems with silt.
Mayor Brinley asked if Dave Stahovich, Supervisor Buster's Aide was still
present; and noted that the City does realize that the County would have its
own issues. Mr. Stahovich responded to Councilwoman Kelley's question
in regard to where the County was in this process; and indicated that they do
not know enough about the project, one way or the other, to develop a
position. He explained that the County would ha~e definite issues making
sure that the environmental impacts are adequately addressed. He stated that
when the EIR comes through, they will be looking at it and commenting
accordingly. He further stated that as far as the committee and the offer to
participate in the Committee, Supervisor Buster made his request very clear.
He stated that Supervisor Buster asked for a copy of the proposal in writing,
before a meeting could be arranged. Mr. Stahovich stated that they would
like to see what they are looking at, and stressed the number of people they
will need to deal with on this project. He indicated that they would want to
see who is on board before committing one way or the other. He stated that
they would like to let the City know that they understand that this could ha~e
tremendous benefits to the local economy and a potential up side to a project
of this nature, and that would be thoroughly reviewed in the process. Mr.
Stahovich indicated that they were not in the position at this time, to say if it
was good, bad or indifferent. He explained that the County wants to make
sure that the City understands that they will be working very closely with the
City. He stated that they would like to make sure that any project of this
magnitude that comes to the area, is going to benefit in every way, shape and
form that it is proposed to do. He stated that with the leadership of the City,
PAGE EIGHT - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 2, 2000
the County and City would work through the project. He noted that the
County and City have worked through other projects in the past and will
process more in the future.
Councilwoman Kelley asked if the County was going to go off
independently. Mr. Stahovich stated that they would be doing their own
committee; and noted that the way the project was presented, it was not in
the County's jurisdiction and it was not necessary for the County to
participate. He noted, therefore having County land use implications it was
felt that the project should be reviewed from that aspect, in conjunction with
whatever the City, Water District, Lake Authority and Water District and
other impacted agencies decide. He stated that they would not be off all by
themselves. Mayor Pro Tem Pape asked if Supervisor Buster was going to
appoint someone to this Committee. Mr. Stahovich stated that they were
still waiting for a proposal of what this Committee was all about. Ms.
Russeth stated that she had sent the draft to Supervisor Buster.
City Manager Watenpaugh stated that this Study Session was intended to
give Enron the opportunity to present the program and he felt that Enron
should do a presentation for the County and let them deal with that.
Mayor Pro Tem Pape asked if after he has made review of the draft, is
Supervisor Buster going to be willing to appoint four members to the
proposed Committee, or is the County going to go out and find their own.
Mr. Stahovich stated that at this point, without evaluating the purpose and
makeup of the Committee, he was not sure; however it was Enron's
Committee and Supervisar Buster would very likely appoint someone to that
Committee. He stated that they would be looking at this from a land use
perspective on their own committee. Mayor Pro Tem Pape stated that it was
Council's first opportunity to lean more about the Lake Elsinare Advanced
Pump Storage Project and the City's first opportunity to ask questions. He
stated that priar to this, the only information the Council had, was what was
in the newspapers. He asked Mr. Stahovich to convey his personal concerns
that the Supervisor would take some swats at the City and make comments
such as "gives the City of Lake Elsinore too much voice". He noted that
there were only five proposed appointments from the City and four from the
County and he didn't see where there was such a discrepancy. He asked that
Supervisor Buster not take shots at the City since he is suppose to represent
the City as we1L
Mayor Brinley stated that she had talked to Supervisar Buster and he stated
that he does want to work with the City on this issue. She thanked Mr.
Stahovich for his input and stated that when the County reaches some
resolution with Enron, then the City and County will be looking toward
moving forward. ~
Councilman Metze stated that he did not understand where Supervisar
Buster got the idea that the City was already involved, since this is the first
PAGE NINE - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 2, 2000
opportunity that the Council has had to see the program and convey his
confusion regarding Supervisor Buster's comments.
Mayor Brinley indicated that Council needs to proceed with the Study
Session and thanked Mr. Stahovich for his attendance.
Mr. Lewandowski presented a Power Point presentation of the proposed
reservoirs at Morrell Canyon and Decker Canyon.
Mayor Pro Tem Pape indicated that he had the opporiunity to meet with
Roger Shintaku and stated that some of his biggest concerns were answered,
one of them being the visual aspect of the project. He commented that one
of his other concerns was noise and it appears that with the facility
underground that would not be an issue. He suggested that one of the issues
that will still need to be addressed is water quality; and indicated that the
water would have to be just as good as the water in that is in the Lake, if not
better. He indicated that as the City's efforts get underway to improve the
water quality in the Lake, the standard would increase. He stated that
Council would have to see what impacts there will be on the Lake. He
indicated a study would have to be done on the effects on the surface of the
Lake. Mayor Pro Tem Pape indicated that he would like to see what effect
the facility would have on marinas with the variation of water levels and
what effect this would have with the Princess. Councilman Metze explained
that the Princess was a historic boat from Catalina. Mayor Pro Tem Pape
asked what effect the facility would ha~e on fish spawning in the Lake with
a shifting shoreline. He asked what the benefits would be to the City and
suggested that power be provided at the Diamond Stadium; at the Parks so
that Little League and Soccer won't have to pay for lights at night.
He noted a Federal Loan for the Levee and suggested that consideration be
given to that as well as the City Operated Campground. He asked about the
topography and natural vegetation in Morrell Canyon. Mr. Lewandowski
gave an overview of the species and vegetation found on both sites. He
explained that they are in the process of negotiating mitigation for the use of
those sites with the U.S. Forest Service. Mayor Pro Tem Pape questioned
the process that will be used to design the reservoir. Mr. Lewandowski
stated that there would be permit conditions imposed by the Forest Service
and noted that it would be mixed use. He gave an overview of possible
mitigation and how the Lake could be enhanced as well.
Mayor Brinley asked if the Committee would address these issues. Mr.
Lewandowski confirmed that they would.
.
Councilman Schiffner requested clarification whether the water level would
shift drastically in Morrell Canyon. Mr. Bakondy stated that it would
fluctuate approximately 35 feet. Mr. Lewandowski stated that the change
would always be less than 40 feet and the fluctuation at Lake Elsinore would
be approximately 1'h foot throughout the day. Councilman Metze asked
PAGE TEN - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 2, 2000
what depth that would be during the day. Mr. Lewandowski stated that it
would be different depending on the location and time of the day. He stated
that they would be conducting a study that would show the change around
the Lake, both at maximum use and minimum use. He indicated that it
would be based on underwater topography. Mayor Pro Tem Pape
questioned the length and width of the lake in Morrell Canyon. Mr.
Lewandowski stated they would provide that information at the time they
have completed final design, however either lake needs to accommodate
approximately 5,500 acre-feet of water. Mayor Brinley asked how deep the
other lakes would be. Mr. Wait stated that they would be 200 feet at their
deepest points.
Councilman Schiffner asked what the consideration would be as to what site
will be chosen. Mr. Lewandowski indicated that the intent of the process is
both under the California Environmental Quality Act and the National
Environmental Policy Act to allow provisions for alternatives. He gave an
overview of the process and stated that the applicant does not determine
which site will be used. He stated that Enron would start the project by
having a preferred site and a secondary site, however the decision makers
will ultimately select which site would be used.
Councilman Metze stated that he did not want to see the City compete with
Enron regarding fishing and recreation on the upper lake. Councilman
Schiffner stated that the fluctuation of water would make it hard to have a
good fishing area. Mr. Lewandowski stated that Federal, State, and Local
Regulations are driving the project. He indicated that since it was a
hydroelectric project it was subject to hydroelectric licensing processes,
which place major emphasis on fisheries. He stated that they would be
working with the various agencies to determine how they would comply
with those requirements. He stated that it was not up to the applicant to
determine if there would be recreation in direct competition with Lake
Elsinore, but rather the decision makers would determine that issue. He
noted that the project would enhance the water quality in Lake Elsinore and
in turn enhance the fishing in the Lake.
Councilman Schiffner asked what percentage of water would move in the
upper lake every day. Mr. Bakondy stated that it would be significant.
Mr. Wait stated that there was an engineering concern regarding the safety
due to the fluctuation of the water level. Mr. Lewandowski stated that the
Forest Service has already stated that they have staffing concerns and it
would not be open to the publia
There was general discussion regarding turbulence and the fact that there
would be no turbulence %.n Lake Elsinore because of the configuration of the
penstocks.
Mayor Brinley called upon those persons who requested to speak as follows:
PAGE ELEVEN - STUDY SESSION - NOVEMBER 2, 2000
Karen Snyder, 33266 Blanche Drive, stated that she lives in Lakeland
Village and is interested in serving on the committee. She noted that she had
served on the Reclaimed Water Task Force and noted that while her initial
stand was against using recycled water in the Lake, through education she
stated that she would prefer reclaimed water. She suggested that the maps
presented should have streets and landmarks included for the benefit of the
residents understanding. She asked what benefit, if any, the project would
have for the average resident, such as the power rates being lower to
surrounding areas affected, especially in Lakeland Village for the residential
consumer. She stated that balanced representation should be a priority since
the County residents will bear the brunt of the project and not the City. She
questioned the bottom line for this project; main issues to be addressed
should be environmental, health, recreational loss, and residential property
values, what effect the intake and release of water will have on the bottom of
the lake; when will accurate maps be available to show precisely by streets
and landmarks, where the power towers and lines will be going; and if there
was really an energy crisis or if this was a manufactured condition.
Donna Franson, 7 Villa Valtelena, questioned the size of the lake that is
proposed versus what was first proposed; the maintenance of the head lake
and asked if that was only for 5 years or for as long as it exists. Mr.
Bakondy stated that it would be for as long as there is a license, but
questioned the period of the license and what happens if it is sold. Ms.
Russeth explained that if the license was sold, then the new owners would
ha~e to take over the maintenance; but questioned the facility in Bakersfield.
Mr. Bakondy explained that it was a water pumping facility and he brought
it up because of the distance the water must travel and noted that it was
approximately the same as the proposed project. Mr. Bakondy stated that
was being negotiated. Mrs. Franson questioned the impact on the residents
and the community, the value of homes and traffic circulation. Mr. Bakondy
stated that Ortega Highway is heavily traveled and it will be impacted by
limited travel for construction. He noted that the economic study would
address property value, any cost to the City and a concern with power lines.
Mayor Brinley suggested that if there was anyone in the audience with
questions they should get an address from Ms. Russeth and she could get
back with the answers.
Chris Hyland, 15191 Waeecrest, stated that based on the newspaper article
a number of people have been calling her regarding that article. She noted
that Ms. Russeth indicated that FERC was most interested in public opinion
and they will get opinions. She indicated that the opinions she has been
getting over the phone were that they had failed to recognize the County.
She further stated that the people in the County are the ones most affected by
the proposed project and those residents were not taken into account when
only four appointments were suggested. 5he suggested that the Council
would choose people that live in areas that would not be affected by the
PAGE TWELVE - STUDY 5ESSION - NOVEMBER 2, 2000
project. She suggested that Mr. Bakondy wear armor when he attends the
ne~ meeting in the County.
Mayor Brinley noted the options thaf were presented to the City; and stated
that there was a great deal to get through and there would be a number of
public hearings to address the issue. She further stated that it was going to
be e~remely important for the Council to select members for the committee
that will cover the entire City. She indicated that the City was looking
forward to working with Enron and the Water District, as well as eventually
the County. She stated that the main goals and objectives were to make sure
that Lake Elsinore benefits from this project through water quality and
employment. She encouraged the public to write Enron with their concems
to give Enron the opportunity to address the issues.
Councilman Metze commented that the County might be doing Enron a
favor by appointing a separate committee. Mr. Bakondy concurred.
ADJOURNMENT
THE CITY COUNCIL STUDY S~SS~ON W
ADJOiJRNED AT 4:50 P.M.
L~
P~iMELA
CITY OF
submitted,
` / // // ~
City of Lake Elsinore
AT EST:
w~~,
VICKI SAD~MC CITY CLERK/
HUMAN RESOUI2C'ES DIR~CTOR
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
~EY,~IVIAYOR
ELSINORE (