The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPC Reso No 1990RESOLUTION 90-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ADDENDUM, FINDINGS OF FACT AS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT,- STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE RAMSGATE SPECIFIC PLAN - FIRST AMENDMENT The Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore does resolve as follows: Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby certifies that there has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore an application by L. D. Johnson Companies (Homestead Land Development Corporation) to amend the 1984 Ramsgate Specific Plan, an area which consists of approximately 1,190 acres of land bounded generally by Maurio Street to the north, Conard Avenue to the south, State Highway 74 to the west and Tuscany Hills to the east for a residential and commercial land use development; that due notice of said application has been given and public hearing conducted thereon pursuant to State Planning and Zoning Law and local ordinance; Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that: 1. This request is anticipated to -result in several significant adverse environmental impacts associated with the development of the site as allowed under the General Plan. These impacts are described in the Ramsgate Specific Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Addendum for the proposed Specific Plan. For each significant impact, measures are imposed to eliminated or substantially lessen their effects. Some of these significant impacts are unavoidable and a Statement of Overriding Consideration is required. Specific findings on each significant impact are provided. Additionally, a program for monitoring mitigation measures contained in the Ramsgate Specific Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Addendum is provided. 2. This request will result in significant environmental impacts associated with loss of biological, earth, aesthetic, and open space resources and a substantial contribution to the cumulative impacts of area-wide urban development which may be partially mitigated. but are anticipated to remain significant upon development of the site as allowed under the General Plan. These impacts are found to be acceptable due to benefits derived by development under the General Plan, specifically the provision of quality housing opportunities by the City, the anticipated increase in local government revenues generated by project residents and the provision of significant infrastructure improvements, all of which are expected to support local commercial and industrial development efforts and generate measurable benefits to the local economy and fiscal integrity of City government. The foregoing overriding consider- ations provide the rationale for a decision to approve this request. 3. The approval of the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Addendum permits development under the Specific Plan to the highest and best nature within mitigable means to ensure maintenance of the general public health, safety and welfare. Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council certify the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Addendum, Findings of Fact as to the environmental impacts, Statements of Overriding Considerations and mitigation monitoring program for the Ramsgate^Specific Plan - First Amendment based upon the findings of the Staff Report and the Conditions of Approval. Section 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify the adoption of this resolution and forward a copy to the City Clerk for reference and consideration of the City Council. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of March, 1990, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Gilenson, Wilsey and Saathoff NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Brinley ABSTENTION: COMMISSIONERS: Brown Q ill Saathoff, Vic Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a Special Meeting thereof conducted on March 19, 1990. ~~ ~~~ Dave Gunde• an, Secretary to the P1 ning Commission RESOLUTION 90-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE RAMSGATE SPECIFIC PLAN - FIRST AMENDMENT AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS WITH RESPECT THERETO The Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore does resolve as follows: Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby certifies that there has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore an application by L. D. Johnson Companies (Homestead Land Development Corporation) for the Ramsgate Specific Plan, an area which consists of approximately 1,190 acres of land bounded generally by Maurio Street to the north, Conard Avenue to the south, State Highway 74 to the west and Tuscany Hills to the east for a residential and commercial land use development; that due notice of said application has been given and public hearing conducted thereon pursuant to State Planning and Zoning Law and local ordinance; Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that: 1. This request is anticipated to result in several significant adverse environmental impacts associated with the development of the site as allowed under the General Plan. These impacts are described in the Ramsgate Specific Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Addendum for the proposed Specific Plan. For each significant impact, measures are imposed to eliminated or substantially lessen their effects. Some of these significant impacts are unavoidable and a Statement of Overriding Consideration is required. Specific findings on each significant impact are provided. Additionally, a program for monitoring mitigation measures contained in the Ramsgate Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Addendum is provided. 2. This request will result in significant environmental impacts associated with loss of biological, earth, aesthetic, and open space resources and a substantial contribution to the cumulative impacts of area-wide urban development which may be partially mitigated but are anticipated to remain significant upon development of the site as allowed under the General Plan. These impacts are found to be acceptable due to benefits derived by development under the General Plan, specifically the provision of quality housing opportunities by the City, the anticipated increase in local government revenues generated by project residents and the provision of significant infrastructure improvements, all of which are expected to support local commercial and industrial development efforts and generate measurable benefits to the local economy and fiscal integrity of City government. The foregoing overriding consider- ations provide the rationale for a decision to approve this request. 3. The approval of the First Amendment permits development within mitigable means to ensure health, safety and welfare. Section 3. The Planning the City Council adopt the Ramsgate findings of the Staff Report and the proposed Ramsgate Specific Plan - to the highest and best nature maintenance of the general public Commission hereby recommends that Specific Plan based upon the a Conditions of Approval. Section 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify the adoption of this resolution and forward a copy to the City Clerk for reference and consideration of the City Council. PASSED AND ADOPTED following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTENTION: COMMISSIONERS: this 19th day of March, 1990, by the Gilenson, Wilsey and Saathoff None Brinley Brown C:C. Bill Saat off, Vice airman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a Special Meeting thereof conducted on March 19, 1990. ave Gunde an, Secretary to the P1 ing Commission RESOLUTION NO. 90-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE RAMSGATE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS WITH RESPECT THERETO The Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore does resolve as follows: Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby certifies that there has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore a Development Agreement by Rialto Development Corporation, which does business as L.D. Johnson Companies, for the Ramsgate Specific Plan - First Amendment, an area which consists of approximately 1,190 acres of land bounded generally by Maurio Street to the north, Conard Avenue to the south, State Highway 74 to the west and Tuscany Hills to the east for a residential and commercial land use development; that due notice of said application has been given and public hearing conducted thereon pursuant to State Planning and Zoning Law and local ordinance; Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that: 1. This request is anticipated to result in several significant adverse environmental impacts associated with the development of the site as allowed under the General Plan. These impacts are described in the Ramsgate Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Addendum for the Ramsgate Specific Plan. For each significant impact, measures are imposed to eliminate or substantially lessen their effect. Some of these significant impacts are unavoidable and a Statement of Overriding Consideration is required. Specific findings on each significant impact are provided. Additionally, a program for monitoring mitigation measures contained in the Ramsgate Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and Addendum is provided. 2. This request will result in significant environmental impacts associated with the loss of biological, earth, aesthetic and open space resources and a substantial contribution to the cumulative impacts of area-wide urban development which may be partially mitigated but are anticipated to remain significant upon development of the site as allowed under the General Plan. These impacts are found to be acceptable due to benefits derived by development under the General Plan, specifically the provision of quality housing opportunities by the City, the anticipated increase in local government revenues generated by project residents and the provision of significant infrastructure improvements, all of which are expected to support local commercial and industrial development efforts and generate measurable benefits to the local economy and fiscal integrity of .City government. The foregoing overriding considerations provide the rationale for a decision to approve this request. The approval of the proposed Development Agreement for the Ramsgate Specific Plan - First Amendment permits development to the highest and best nature within mitigable means to ensure maintenance of the general public health, safety and welfare. Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Development Agreement for the Ramsgate Specific Plan - First Amendment, as modified, based upon the findings of the Staff Report. Section 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify the adoption of this resolution and forward a copy to the City Clerk for reference and consideration of the City Council. Je 'Brown, Chairman Lake s' ore Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a regular meeting thereof conducted on April 4, 1990, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS Gilenson, Saathoff, Wilsey and Brown NOES: COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS Brinley ABSTENTION: COMMISSIONERS None /'~ Dave Gun man, Secretary to the P1 ning Commission RESOLUTION NO. 90-4 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-9 TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE 1982 GENERAL PLAN CHANGING THE DESIGNATION OF 6.6 ACRES FROM SPECIFIC PLAN TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL. The Planning resolve as follows: Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore does Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby certifies that there has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore an application by Tomislav Gabric Associates for amendment to the 1982 General Plan Land Use Element to change the designation from Specific Plan to General Commercial on 6.6 acres located at Lakeshore Drive and Avenue 6; that due notice of said application has been given and public hearing conducted thereon pursuant to State Planning and Zoning Law and local ordinance; Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that: 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use and allow density more in keeping with the subject property's location, access and site characteristics. 2. A significant amount of land use circulation and planning has already been accomplished on the subject property and on surrounding properties to eliminate the need to prepare a Specific Plan. 3. Planned drainage improvements, to be funded and implemented as part of the West Lake Elsinore Assessment District, will remove the threat of flood hazards. 4. The proposed General Plan Land Use Designation is compatible with proposed surrounding uses and development patterns. Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt General Plan Amendment 89-9 to amend the General Plan Land Use Element from Specific Plan Area to General Commercial based upon the findings presented herein. Section 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and forward a copy to the City Clerk for reference and consideration of the City Council. ~ = rown, c:nairman Lake E1 or Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a regular meeting thereof conducted on February 21, 1990, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Gilenson, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Wilsey ABSTENTION: COMMISSIONERS: None Dave Gun rman, Secretary to the P1 ning Commission Brinley, Saathoff and Brown RESOLUTION NO. 90-5 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-14 TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE 1982 GENERAL PLAN ESTABLISHING THE DESIGNATION OF 36 ACRES TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE). The Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore does resolve as follows: Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby certifies that there has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore an application by Homestead Land Development for amendment to the 1982 General Plan Land Use Element to designate as Low Density Residential (0-6 dwelling units per acre) on 36 acres located south of Scenic Crest Drive, west of Greenwald Avenue, north of the current City boundary; that due notice of said application has been given and public hearing conducted thereon pursuant to State Planning and Zoning Law and local ordinance; Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that: 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use and allow density more in keeping with the subject property's location, access and site characteristics. 2. A significant amount of land use circulation and planning has already been accomplished on surrounding properties. 3. Planned infrastructure for the adjacent development will allow the property logical access. 4. The proposed General Plan Land Use Designation is compatible with proposed surrounding uses and development patterns. 5. The proposed General Plan Land Use Designation is consistent with the Goals, Policies and Objectives of the General Plan. Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt General Plan Amendment 89-14 to amend the General Plan Land Use Element from Specific Plan and Floodplain/Floodway to Low Density Residential based upon the findings presented herein. Section 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and forward a copy to the City Clerk for reference and consideration of the City Council. Je Brown, Chairman Lake Els' ore Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a regular meeting thereof conducted on March 7, 1990, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Gilenson, Brown NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTENTION: COMMISSIONERS: None Brinley, Saathoff, Wilsey, Dave Gundan, Secretary to the Pla ing Commission RESOLUTION NO. 90-6 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-1 TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE 1982 GENERAL PLAN CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ON A 6.042 ACRE PARCEL The Planning Commission resolve as follows: of the City of Lake Elsinore does Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby certifies that there has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore an application by Pentagon Development for amendment to the 1982 General Plan Land Use Element to change the land use designation from Neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential (12.1-20 dwelling units per acre - condominiums; 12.1-24 dwelling units per acre - apartments) on 6.042 acres located at the southeast corner of Grand Avenue and Macy Street; that due notice of said application has been given and public hearing conducted thereon pursuant to State Planning and Zoning Law and local ordinance; Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that: 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use more in keeping with the subject property's location, access, and site characteristics. 2. The proposal will not result in any potential significant impacts on the environment. 3. The proposed use is more compatible with the surrounding residential land uses than a commercial use. 4. The proposal will serve to further the Goals, Policies, and objectives of the General Plan regarding the appropriateness and placement of multi-family dwellings. 5. The proposal will permit reasonable development of the property, with adequate future design review, consistent with characteristics of the site and the adjacent properties. Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt General Plan Amendment 90-1 to amend the General Plan Land Use Element from Neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential (12.1-20 dwelling units per acre - condominiums; 12.1-24 dwelling units per acre - apartments) based upon the findings presented herein. Section 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and forward a copy to the City Clerk for reference and consideration of the City Council. Je f n, Chairman Lake Elsi o e lanning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a regular meeting thereof conducted on March 7, 1990, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTENTION: COMMISSIONERS: Dave Gunde an, Secretary t the Pla ng Commission Saathoff, Brown Gilenson, Brinley, Wilsey None None 0 RESOLUTION NO. 90-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-2 TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE 1982 GENERAL PLAN CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM FLOODPLAIN/FLOOD- WAY TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) ON A 7.6 NET ACRE PARCEL The Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore does resolve as follows: Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby certifies that there has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore an application by Jones/Tomich for amendment to the 1982 General Plan Land Use Element to change the land use designation from Floodplain/Floodway to Low Density Residential (0-6 dwelling units per acre) on 7.6 net acres located approximately 1,500 feet west of Shirley Drive, south of Washington Avenue, east of Michigan Street; that due notice of said application has been given and public hearing conducted thereon pursuant to State Planning and Zoning Law and local ordinance; Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that: 1. The proposed Low Density Residential General Plan designation for the site is consistent with the surrounding land uses and will allow comparable residential densities. 2. Planned storm drainage improvements to be funded and implemented through the West Lake Elsinore Assessment District will mitigate flood hazards to the site. 3. The proposal is consistent with the Goals, Policies and Objectives of the General Plan. Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt General Plan Amendment 90-2 to amend the General Plan Land Use Element from Floodplain/Floodway to Low Density Residential based upon the findings presented herein. Section 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and forward a copy to the City Clerk for reference and consideration of the City Council. f own, Chairman Lake E i o Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a regular meeting thereof conducted on March 7, 1990, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Gilenson, Brinley, Saathoff, Wilsey, Brown NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTENTION: COMMISSIONERS: None Dave Gun an, Secretary to the P1 ning Commission RESOLUTION NO. 90-8 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-15 CHANGING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE 1982 GENERAL PLAN FROM ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVE TO LIMITED INDUSTRIAL FOR 15.29 ACRES The Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore does resolve as follows: Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby certifies that there has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore an application by Brookstone Development for amendment to the 1982 General Plan Land Use Element changing the land use from Environmental Sensitive to Limited Industrial on 15.29 acres on the northeast corner of Silver and Flint Streets; that due notice of said application has been given and public hearing conducted thereon pursuant to State Planning and Zoning Law and local ordinance; Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that: 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use and allow density more in keeping with the subject property~s location, access and site characteristics. 2. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the surrounding land use designations. 3. The proposed General Plan Land Use Designation is consistent with the Goals, Policies and Objectives of the General Plan. Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt General Plan Amendment 89-15 to amend the General Plan Land Use Element from Environmental Sensitive to Limited Industrial based upon the findings presented herein. Section 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and forward a copy to the City Clerk for reference and consideration of the City Council. . , .,..u~~.,,a.. Lake Els n Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a regular meeting thereof conducted on March 7, 1990, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Gilenson, Brinley, Saathoff, Wilsey, Brown NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTENTION: COMMISSIONERS: None ~~ Dave Gund man, Secretary to the Pl ning Commission RESOLUTION NO. 90-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE LAKE ELSINORE OUTLET CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS WITH RESPECT THERETO. The Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore does resolve as follows: Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby certifies that there has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore an application by the McArthur/Glen Group for the Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Specific Plan,. an area which consists of 43 acres of land generally bounded by Nichols Road to the west, E1 Toro Road to the east, Collier Avenue to the south and Interstate 15 to the north for a retail outlet center; that due notice of said application has been given and public hearing conducted thereon pursuant to State Planning and Zoning Law and local ordinance; Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that• 1. This request is anticipated to result in several significant adverse environmental impacts associated with the development of the site as allowed under the General Plan. These impacts are described in the Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report. For each significant impact, measures are imposed to eliminate or substantially lessen their effects. Some of these significant impacts are unavoidable and a Statement of Overriding Consideration is required. Specific findings on each significant impact are provided. Additionally, a program for monitoring mitigation measures contained in the Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Environmental Impact Report is provided. This request will result in significant environmental impacts associated with loss of biological, aesthetic, and open space resources and a substantial contribution to the cumulative impacts of area-wide urban development which may be partially mitigated but are anticipated to remain significant upon development of the site as allowed under the General Plan. These impacts are found to be acceptable due to benefits derived by development under the General Plan, specifically the provision of quality retail development in the City and the anticipated increase in local government revenues generated by the project, both of which are expected to generate measurable benefits to the local economy and fiscal integrity of City government. The foregoing overriding considerations provide the rationale for a decision to approve this request. The approval of the proposed Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Specific Plan permits development under the Specific Plan to the highest and. best nature within mitigable means to ensure maintenance of the general public health, safety and welfare. Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Specific Plan, based upon the Findings of the Staff Report and the Conditions of Approval. Section 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify the adoption of this resolution and forward a copy to the City Clerk for reference and consideration of the City Council. PASSED AND ADOPTED following roll call vote: this 16th day of May 1990, by the AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTENTIONS: COMMISSIONERS: Gilenson, Brinley, Saathoff, Wilsey, Brown None None None J B wn, Chairman Lake E1 ore Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a Regular Meeting thereof conducted on May 16, 1990. Dave Gu rman, Secretary to the P nning Commission RESOLUTION NO. 90-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, FINDINGS OF FACT AS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE LAKE ELSINORE OUTLET CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN. The Planning Commission does resolve as follows: of the City of Lake Elsinore Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby certifies that there has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore an application by the McArthur/Glen Group for the Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Specific Plan, an area which consists of 43 acres of land generally bounded by Nichols Road to the west, E1 Toro Road to the east, Collier Avenue to the south and Interstate 15 to the north for a retail outlet center; that due notice of said application has been given and public hearing conducted thereon pursuant to State Planning and Zoning Law and local ordinance; Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that: 1. This request is anticipated to result in several significant adverse environmental impacts associated with the development of the site as allowed under the General Plan. These impacts are described in the Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report. For each significant impact, measures are imposed to eliminate or substantially lessen their effects. Some of these significant impacts are unavoidable and a Statement of Overriding Consideration is required. Specific findings on each significant impact are provided. Additionally, a program for monitoring mitigation measures contained in the Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Environmental Impact Report is provided. 2. This request will result in significant environmental impacts associated with. loss of biological, aesthetic, and open space resources and a substantial contribution to the cumulative impacts of area-wide urban development which may be partially mitigated but are anticipated to remain significant upon development of the site as allowed under the General Plan. These impacts are found to be acceptable due to benefits derived. by development under the General Plan, specifically the provision of quality retail development in the City and the anticipated increase in local government revenues generated by the project, both of which are expected to generate measurable benefits to the local economy and fiscal integrity of City government. The foregoing overriding considerations provide the rationale for a decision to approve this request. 3. The approval of the proposed Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Specific Plan permits development under the Specific Plan to the highest and best nature within mitigable means to ensure maintenance of the general public health, safety and welfare. Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Specific Plan, based upon the Findings of the Staff Report and the Conditions of Approval. Section 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify the adoption of this resolution and forward a copy to the City Clerk for reference and consideration of the City Council. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of May 1990, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Gilenson, Brinley, Saathoff, Wilsey, Brown NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTENTIONS: COMMISSIONERS: None J f B n, Chairman Lake E1 in re lanning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a Regular Meeting thereof conducted on May 16, 1990. Dave Gun man, Secretary to the P anning Commission RESOLUTION NO. 90-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE WEST LAKE ELSINORE DEVELOPERS (CENTEX REAL ESTATE, LA LAGUNA ESTATES, MARINITA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, PREMIER HOMES, MEEKER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, TOMICH/JONES, TORN RANCH, AND GOLDEN STATE DEVELOPMENT). WHEREAS, the West Lake Elsinore Developers have made application to the City of Lake Elsinore for a Development Agreement with respect to the West Lake Elsinore Community Facilities District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Development Agreement on July 18, 1990, and considered the evidence and testimony presented in connection with the proposed Development Agreement, including but not limited to the environmental documentation therefor; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore as follows: Section 1. The proposed Development Agreement between the West Lake Elsinore Developers and the City of Lake Elsinore is consistent with the City's General Plan and the Zoning ordinance. Section 2. The previously certified environmental impact report prepared for the West Lake Elsinore Community Facilities District is adequate and complete for the proposed Development Agreement. Section 3. It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approve the proposed Development Agreement. Section 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and forward a copy to the City Clerk for reference and consideration of the City Council. e =~ tsrown, cnairman Lake 1 inore Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a Regular Meeting thereof conducted on the 18th day of July 1990, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTENTION: COMMISSIONERS: Gilenson, Brinley, Saathoff and 3rown None None Wilsey e~ez/' Dave Gun man, Secretary to the Plan g Commission RESOLUTION NO. 90-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING DENIAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE COMMERCIAL PROJECT 90-12. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission hereby certifies that there has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore a design review application by United Metric Development Corporation/BHI Dover Fund V for the construction of a 5,100 square foot "Chief Auto Parts", a retail automobile parts and accessory store, in the Town Center retail plaza, located at the southwest corner of Mission Trail and Campbell Street; that due notice of said application has been given and public hearing conducted thereon pursuant to State Planning and Zoning Law and Local Ordinance; SECTION 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that: 1. The Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Section 17.82.010., Purpose, of the "Design Review" Ordinance declares "... a quality physical environment as being necessary for the protection of the public's health, safety and welfare..." and that "... new development...occurs in a manner which enhances the character and quality of surrounding properties..." 2. The Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Section 17.82.080.C., Findings, declares the Planning Commission shall make the following findings before recommending a design review approval: "Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070., including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Chapter...". Page 2 3. The project as designed cannot ensure that auditory and visually offensive outdoor activities or activities which would leave unattended auto-oriented chemicals and parts .that could threaten the public's health, safety and welfare, will not occur, and therefore, does not meet the Findings specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.82.080.C., Findings. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council deny without prejudice Commercial Project 90-12 based upon the Findings presented herein. SECTION 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy to the Clerk for reference and consideration of the City Council. l '~--~~.~._.__ ill Saathoff, Chai m n Lake Elsinore Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a regular meeting thereof conducted on September 19, 1990, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTENTION: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: GILENSON, BRINLEY, BROWN, SAATHOFF NONE NONE WILSEY Dave Gunde_ an, Secretary to the Pl ing Commission RESOLUTION NO. 90-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 90-3 The Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore does resolve as follows: Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby certifies that there has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore an application by the City of Lake Elsinore to designate Collier Avenue between Riverside Drive and Nichols Road as a major arterial and to permit roadway construction (Exhibit I); that due notice of said application has been given and public hearing conducted thereon pursuant to State Planning and Zoning Law and local ordinance; Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that: 1. This request is anticipated to result in several significant adverse environmental impacts associated with the development of the site. These impacts are described in the Collier Avenue Improvement Project Environmental Impact Report for the proposed proj ect. A program for monitoring mitigation measures contained in the Collier Avenue Improvement Project Environmental Impact Report is provided as Exhibit II. The mitigation monitoring program identifies measures to eliminate or SUbstantially lessen the environmental impacts identified in the environmental impact report, and provides an accounting/monitoring program to ensure the implementation of mitigation measures. Specific findings for each significant impact are as provided in Exhibit III. 2. This request will result in significant environmental impacts as identified in the environmental impact report. Mitigation measures are provided for the impacts associated with implementation of the proposed proj ect which reduce the environmental impacts to a level of insignificance. Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council certify Environmental Impact Report 90-3 based upon the findings of the staff report. Section 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission certify the adoption of this resolution and forward a copy City Clerk for reference and consideration of t ty C n ice ChaJ.rman Planning Commission I hereby certify that the pre eding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a regular meeting thereof conducted on November 7, 1990, by the following roll call vote: - AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTION: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: Brinley, Brown, Wilsey, Gilenson None Saathoff None ~ Dave Gund the Plan i an, Secretary g Commission Exhibit 1 Legend B PIojIc:l Ant. ..... 1ClI:IlIOPt MIll mil 2100 FMI ......... .............. Local Vicinity Map CoUier A venue Improvement Project ~ - - ~ Z ~ o E-4 ~~ ~~ Zo _, 8 ~ ''I E-c ~ E::c3~ =~z -E-c- =-~ ~::?jo ~~=-- ~~ ~~ ~ r.::l 3 - 0 u - , ~....... .... C G.l = I:J .~ ; .. ... 5- c e 'C c ~u = G.l .~ = "3 ~~ ... G.l .. - .- .. ::?j~ "" .s =n G.l = - ... ,J:J "" ... c ~ .. = ... c = Q,~ ~~ ~ ~ = Q G.l e = z ~ ~ = ~ = G.l ~ = c ... .. = =n ... .. ~ ..... o - ca .n ~ s:: .... ca 0..- 0..0.. ca s:: Of) 0'- .... ~ "0 ....- .8 ~ ~u:l .... ~ ~ s:: 'bi> s:: ~ .e- U r.::l en ~ Q j ~50 .....- ~ ca.O' ..sg(i. 'i Q) ~ ......r::: ~ ~ .... ......r::: s:: ~..... _'1"""4 .S s:: ..s "E O'i o "-' 13.~ ~ c.>_ _ s:: 0 ta ~ 0.. -5ca.e- 0:'= ~ ca-'= '~.'C: ::3 U 0.. >. os::. ~ .... ca ca .s:: g;..... ~ ~caoca - ..... o - ~ .n 8 ~ 0..- 0..0.. ca s:: Of) 0'- .... ~ "0 ....- .9 ca .... s:: ~u:l .... ~ ~ s:: 'bi> s:: ~ .e- U .... ..... s:: 0 ~ c.> s:: ca 0 :s -.:: ca';:;; ..r::: 'S .~ g' . ~ ca ~ 2 ~ ~ ca..r:::..... .S .... 9 "Os::.... C5 0 -fo 8 ~.c: _~"O ta s:: s:: ..r::: ~ ca "-' 0 ti .~ .e- ~ u ~ s ~ 0.. ~ ~ 0 "-' .... ca o..~ N ..... o - ~ .n 8 ~ 0..- 0..0.. ca s:: Of) 0'- .... ~ "0 ....- .9 ca .... s:: ~u:l .... ~ ~ s:: 'bi> s:: ~ .e- U ....- . c.> - ~ ~ ca ::3 .~ s:: 8 .... ~ 0.. ..s > < ~ "-' .... ..s8~ ....c.>- ..sca8 ~~~ s:: ~ 0 'i i1) ta e'~ ~ "0"0,,-, ::3 s::...."O .9 ~ s:: .... ti:l ca c.>~- ::3 .... Of) ~ .S s::- .... 8 ta.~ -5 ~ M ..... o 8 s:: ~ .~ ~ S .- .... ~ o 0.. ....Of) .....s 0"0 .C e ~Of) .... ~ ~ s:: 'bi> s:: ~ .e- U ~ . ~ ~ ..r:::"O..r:::..r::: ....~........ ~"O s:: S s:: Of) ._ ~ ca.S ..r::: .... .e-"O 'j ,g u ~ - ~ ~ -..r:::.... ~] .... ::3 "-' s:: ~ .... >.~"O c.> ca ~ ca .5 ~ ~ S "-'..... ~ 9..o,g Of).... .... s::-fos::- -.r;: .0 e ca .~ "0 ~ -5 . i1) ~ ~ ta "-' .... .... > 00f)~0 ~g.ca~S ~ (i.~ 0 ~ ..,f ..... o ~ c.> s:: . ~ .~ .!a E ~ o 0.. ....Of) .....S .9 -g P::~ "...; .~ >..... ~ .... s:: ~ .- ~ ,S s:: S Of)::30.. s:: ~ 0 .... 'T' I=< _ 0 -S~O .e- >~ ._ 0 ~._ UUOO ~o"O ..s~a 0-= ..sU~ 'i"O ~ s:: ca >.ca - ..... 0.. 0 e~- 00 ca c.> U ~ <( S = ~ ].....~ ,,-,o..r::: .... .e-~~ U.9 '2 .... .... ~ ~ 8 ~ .s:: Of) s:: ~ ~~13ca ~ "...; o o o M 00 o "...; - lXl ..., It) ~ Z ;l- 0"2 E-t 6 ~ ... z.... o 8 :g~ N9~ E-t~~ -~o =-=: -E-t~ ~~~ ~~ ;l~ Zo ~~ ~Cl 3~ o u ---- --- $ = Cl .... Q ~ Cl I:.J Q Cl ... = .... ... =- I:.J -= e ... ,. Q ~u ~ e = Z Cl ~ .S Cl ....,s ~r.n ;:~ .- .""", :a:g ,. .s~ ~ Cl :is 'C ... Q r.n .... Cl ... Q Cl =-Q r.n:a ~ r.n t = III 5 :a Cl Q ... .... = ~ ... .... ... :a ...... o 8 r:: . ~ .~ ~ s .- 1-4 Q) o c:l.. .... tlll 1-4.5 0"0 'C CIl ~6h 1-4 Q) Q) r:: '6'0 r:: ~ .e- U - "'0 Q,I = Cl ... .... Cl Q I:.J "-' ~ 1-4 . CIl CIl Q) Q) ~ >,> ~ ~8"" ..d .-4 .~ .~ Q) 8 -5c:l.. Q) Q) ............d ~ 0 .... .- r:: "0....._ 1-4r::..d 8 ~.~ _11 c:l.. ta Q) CIl ..d e S r.n CIl r:: .e- 'a .~ C1J........ U ..d c:l.. ...."0 Q) 0 .r::r::l0 ~Ol:;:l ~ rJ:l ;l Q j \0 ...... o Q) u r:: . ~ .~ .; 8 Q) o c:l.. ....tlll 1-4.5 0"0 'C e ~tlll 1-4 Q) ~ '6'0 r:: ~ .e- U tlll r:: .- "0 CIl 1-4 ~ <I.l tlllr::l r::.Sl .;: e ::s Q) Og. CIl..,l OQ)"o 1-40 ..d .... c:l.. r:: C,j,;< .... tlll 0 CIl"O CIl 'a) "0 <;; Q) ..d,E1-4oil>. "o",UQ)r::o C1J .::::= ctt .... -00 ........ ~~s-g~S- '5 c.E 8 Q) S- Q) "O~ -582 2 .9 2 .9 oil~ c:l.. r.n r:: Vol . - ::s = "8.- Q) r::l -:::: CIl CIl= - 0 '" .-4 ..r:: "0 t::: OJ',c ~c'!Volr:: eu ... CIl 1-4 tlll ::s - ....Q) 1-4 rsOrsVolO.9~ g.~ g.s ~8 - e _::s .- Vol.~ Vol.5 . e Q) _ -r::l Sc:l.. ........ .........~ g _'I"IIt 0 u=sU=stS.\::<;; rJ:l ~ u =: ;l o rJ:l ~ ~ :I: ~ ~ ...; -- tlll r::l .- "0 CIl 1-4 tlll <I.l tlllr:: r::.Sl .... 1-4 e ::s Q) og. N 1-4 Q) Q) r:: '6'0 ~ .e- U r::l~r::"O ~r::lQ)-<n ._ 1-4'- Q) 0'1._ ::s ~ Q) o 1-4 _"0 r::l'- !:: "0 ~"O CIl .- Q) Q) r::l ... Q)-5.g fr~E~fJ ~ S 1-4'S: 1-4 <( Q)....... Q) ~ 1-4C1l0c:l.. <n E-4'- ..8Q)1-4r::l ~Q)1-4 ~ ta c:l...Sl B ~ ~ ~ a c:l.. 1-4 Vol .... CIl Vol - - .- ~ a.~'o': 8 ~ ~ Q) Q)._ .... 0 1-4 ._ .0 tlll ~ rs ~ 8.. Q) t) .~ Q) ~ > <l:; Q) -5 .~ S = ..r::._ = 1-4 0"' CIl .... u'-"O", 1-4 "'" ..d..dQ)-r::~"""~.r::.. Vol .... c:l.. ~ CIl'- 0 ~ ~ ':i Vol..... E .... 0 tlll tlll.E r:: Q) ~ r:: <I.l Q) r::8r::u.9Q) Q)Q).o :.s r:::.s ,E ..r:: p'~ ~ .~ "0 ~ ~ ~ g'~ 11 ~ 11 ~ ~ tlll~ >2 8. 1-4 8.~ =3 8 1I,.g >. ~ ..s- S- ..s- ~ <l.,CIlCll....'O.-4......._.......CIl -- >< .....; o o o M 00 o ...... - ~ ~ N -- - ~ Z - ...... Cl::"c:::l o ~ 0..... = ~ .5 Z.... o S ~~ N~~ E-c~~ SS~ -E-c~ ~~~ r.-lr.-l~ ~~ Zo ~~ r.-lQ 3~ - 0 u - ~....... .$ = Q ... o ~ = C,j o = .... = .... .... a- 5 e ... 0 ~u ~ e = Z = ~ .s = ....3 = rIl .gp ~ .... - ~:i ... .s ~ ~ = :E .C .... 0 rIl .... = .... o = =-0 rIl~ ~ rIl t = rIl = ~ ~ = o .... .... = ~ .... .... :i ...... "c:::l ~ = = .... .... = o C,j '-' ]B~C5~ ..-4=:= ...... - .- - ~ Cl .~ :; e P.. a C B bO.9 c.l:: .9 (.) bO "" ~ .... = c:::::: (.) (.) 0..._ u:: = ..ss~.......9 g8-ao~ . sr bO iii II) bO -:.S bO B .S ,9 ~ ~ ....::sa i1J - -..c =.- 0.. -a 0..(.) =' 0 .- >... ~ ~ - .... ~ =' .... = "" C "0 "" ~ bO:::::: BII)II)t':lcu:: :< ~ t:@.t:::.o ..... - bO II) II)'S: 0 11)'- .. .... 0 .c.-::: (.) = .. g. ~ S.S so...... r:J:l ~ u Cl:: ;::l o r:J:l r.-l ~ :I: ~ ~ . ~ ufM' ~ ;..::: II) 00 ._ ..~O\"" ~'u ...... ..~"O.. 5< a,B C ~ .- "0 ~ "" C 00 II) Ct':lO\- o ......~ 'J:: C ~ ~ ~B~:.:: C ..c 00 0.. ~ .~ 0\ 0....; s:;.3......t':lC S __O\~ ~ o r-- s:; (.)""O\co.. ~ 1:: ...... '(; .9 II) & J S ~ E9~~~~ . bO C .- "0 = .. bO ..; bOC c.9 .... .. e =' II) Qg. .. II) II) C '&1 C ~ .e- U II)"O_CB ~ C t':l t':l._ _t':l..cll)"" -a "" "0 ..c ~'c.E "0 ""II)~(.)C .. II) C 0 = .... "0'- ~ ~ - = a] -a ~ ....o=..c C'- "".... 1I)~..c",,~ s~t:@:E"'" CbO~~ bO II) _ V') ~ > C':$ t':l 'u 2 bO ~ :a '-2 ;B .S .... II) ..... "0 ""..... 0..0 C &0='''011) o r:J:l II) >< ~]..;"3 II) ..'_ t':l ]~.E..c ~"U~] M bh C =:.0 II) t':l .. .. = bO bO C .- "0 = .. bO bO~ c.9 .... .. e =' II) Qg. .. II) II) C .- bO C ~ .e- U "0 "0 _ "0 c.~ ~ B] 3 ~ a ....e""O....bO ~ ~ iE 6'0] C5 ~""-a-""..... II) "0.- t':l II) 0 ..c C ~.S 0 C .... ='J:: .~..s t':l ...."0......11) =13~0~"U 0.. t::r: -a II) "0 "0 S -a "O~.;3 ~ ] e..cC 0(.) (.) t':l 0 0...- II) ._ - .... ~ 0.. .;3z]"01I) ..Bt':lIl)>.c13~ ..8 bO S 0 ~ u:: .5 ~ S (1).c 0."0 0 II) (.) ~ II) C "" ...~ "" _~ g ~ II) '"C ~t:@~~~] -.:i- ('I') ~ ....... o o o M 00 o ....... - ~ ...... e,:, Z C2~ o ~ t:: .5 Z'" o = :;E~ M9~ E-4E-4e,:, -<0 =:d:Z ~ -E-4~ ~~e,:, ~~~ ;:J~ Zo ~~ ~ ~~ 3~ o u ~ ---- ~ = ~ ... = ~ = ~ = = .... .s ... = - ~ c e .C = ~u ~ e = Z = ~ = = ~S = fI) .~ ~ ... - .... .... :;E:;E ... tS=t) .! .5 :S ~ fI) ... = .... = = Q.= fI):;E ~ fI) t = fI) 5 :;E = = .... ... = =t) .... ... ~ ,-.. 'e ~ = = .... ... = = ~ -- =-go~ 0=8..l:l I-< Cf.l ... ~ 0 = ~ c:;:l..'C ~..l:l 0 g g~'c vi 0.... t) = '';:: ... ..l:l ~ :aN~t)c:;:l.. =...-l 0 ;::S bll o - tI) = t) ...... .... O~d-g o 0 I-< I-< ..l:l '';:: bll .ao.B~= .~ 0 ~ c:;:l.. 0 ~ ~ 2 88""8 e ~ 1:) ~ ;::S c:;:l.. 0 0 t 8 8 .E: ~ :::.S 8 ~ I-< =.... 0 ~ 0 8 8 I-< 1-<.0 tI) r.:l U ~ ;:J o tI) ~ == ~ ~ bll = :a = . I-< ~ bllO bll .... =~ .... I-< I-< 0 =' c:;:l.. o 0 I-< o o = '6:0 = u.:l ~ tJ I-<0=~00>' . =~.o..l:l.o~ Cf.l..l:l.... ... =Cf.l8= ~ o I-<"'=..l:lO...-l ~ * ~ ~.t:; a 0\ ~:>...Cf.l~0:-= I-< ~ ~ = I-< I-< =bllOOOc:;:l...3' 8=~I-<0 ........ .... = = .... = ...~o "'0";- o = 8..l:l ='';:: 0 ~= Cf.l~=... = ~ 8 ~ t5 .:=P.:S :E=888t;15 .... .... 0 ... = 0 Cf.l ~-51-<0 ~< o.~ ~ ~ =.... Cf.l ~ = .... _ ~ = = I-< = = .0 ~ "tf..8 ~ .~ = >.00 == ~~~~E-flB ~ I-< 0 = 0 o..l:l =0';:.0 Cf.lo bll .9 -5 0...... ~ 0 .~ ~ 0.0 0 c:;:l..bll...l v) bll = .... ~ = I-< bll vi bll= =.9 ... I-< e =' 0 08" I-< o o = '6:0 = u.:l ~ tJ -fl ~ ~""8 ~-g .S ... ~.S'c = I ~ 8 0 ooO=I-<Obll o - .... o.S = ... ... ~ ... bll .... = 0 = t:: '-'> 0 c:l~ 0 0...; ... 0 c:;:l..- = .... ~ 8 u:l .... ""8 1:) =:-=.... ~ ~...==o 0 ot)c:;:l.. Cf.lo'" t)=8~ ...t) ~c:;:l..oo= &. c:;:l..8t)~ 1-<8 o 8 o..a 8.8 8 .0 ~ > = c:;:l.. _='':::~O fI) -=~.....t: = = 0 ... ... ~ tl I-< 0 .S = ~ ....0 0 0 08 =--c= """""'Q.. u:l00 .o~o Cf.l t)=.5 =0 ::::l 0 t =.... = = "'l.,.9 c:;:l..~ a ~ Q.. ...0 -- ...... o o t) = . ~ .~ Cf.l 8 .~ I-< o o c:;:l.. ... bll I-<'S 0"'0 .C e ~bll ~ I-< o o = '6:0 &i ~ tJ o 0 ~ 0 c:;:l....."'3..l:l .9 bll 0 ... Cf.l =..l:l Cf.l bll.... Cf.l = ="'0 .~ 8] ~ '>: Cf.l t) t) O=="s o ... 0 ..l:l=.o ... 0 0 0 =]:0 8" ~=.5;;; iE ~'S 0 8Cf.l..l:l ~ ~... .... 0 "'0 t) ~ = 0 ~ CI:l 00 c:;:l.. 0 ~.... o I-< Cf.l ..... ... 0 - ;::S I-<..l:l 0 t) o.....l:l .... t) I-< ...... .... 0 P-toz.o -- ~ ...... o o o c'i 00 o ...... - o::l ~ r..: -- - ~ z Ea~ o ~ ~ ~ - .... z- o 6 ~~ ~~~ ~~~ -C]o =:l_~ -~~ ~~~ r.:lr.:l~ ~~ Zo ~~ r.:l~ 3~ - 0 u - ~--- ~ = ~ ""' Q ~ = ~ Q = .... = - .... =- ~ = e ... Q ~u ~ e = Z = ~ .e = -s ~fIJ .... ~ - - ..... .- ~~ ... .5len ~ = - .C :e Q fIJ _ = .... Q = Q.,Q fIJ~ ~ ~ fIJ ~ = fIJ = ~ ~ = Q .... - = en .... - ~ -. "0 ~ = = .... - = Q ~ '-' O~ ... 0 0..... = ~ ...r:;:: .:::: 0 eo'" ;:l 0 8.0 .0== .~ ~ _Vol 1;3 ~ ~ 'C tI:l B O'C ~ ... U tI:l ....::::- s:: U 0.. o ;:l eo 8 V'J .S o ~ E5 . tI:l ... .g 6h o..tI:ls:: .13 5h 0 V'J r.:l U ez:: ~ o V'J r.:l ~ = ~ ~ ...... o 8 r:: . ~ .~ ~ 8 .- ... o o 0.. "'eo .....S 0"'0 .0 e P-ceo ... o o r:: '6iJ r:: ~ .e- O ~OO~~-d -.o.s~oo "3==8~:~ 0>~0.80== ...Vol":= Otl:l 0.. .:::: 0.. 0 ~ vi V'J 0 tI:leo::..o .0 tI:l ... 0.. . o.S tI:l.9 ~ ... .0 e "'0 Vol.~ 0 __0 ~s:: - v s:: 0 tI:l ._ __ .::::Otl:lVV_ Vol >... r:: 0-= .- s:: tI:l eo '" s:: .-:: .~ tI:l ~ tI:l Vol ~ s:: 0. 0 I=i 0.- P-c~UeVol o r::..s~ 0 eo tI:l.... 0.. tI:l' ;:l ~ 0 r:: .e-~ Vol 0- ._'_ 0 > Vol tI:lU... 0 ... U ~ ... ... ~Ootl:lo..o .A' .::::.!:: 0 0.. > .........."'O...tI:lO cx5 eo s:: .- ~ tI:l ... eo v.i eoS:: s:: .9 ... .... e ;:l 0 08' ... o o r:: .- eo r:: ~ .e- O .s .8 .€ .~ - ~"'O:O ~0.5 o .S Vol i:i.5c; .:s .S .u o..tI:llQ o 8 ~ .0 Vol -~~ c; ~ s:: .:::: tI:l Vol ... s:: o 0 Vol >._ o 0 Vol o..u8 .9 0 Vol "3 0 v.i '?- >.~ ~ -508- tI:l ~'8.g c:s ~'S ~ ...... o - ~ v.i 8 ~ 0..- 0..0.. tI:l s:: eo 0'- ... ~ "'0 ....- .9 tI:l .... r:: P-clQ ... o o s:: .- eo r:: ~ .e- O r:: .- o .0 v.i ~ - ... - tI:l tI:l"'O .:::: s:: Vol tI:l ... Vol Vol.e- r:: ._ .9 U ... u.:::: o ... Vol .~ ... 8 r:: s:: o tI:l 8~ ... ~ ~ P-c ~ 0\ ...... o 8 s:: . ~ .~ .~ E o o 0.. "'eo .....S o~ 'C e P-ceo ... ~ s:: '6iJ s:: ~ .e- O t.s~ .g~V'J ~o r::M .- ... ... tI:l o tI:l._ ~"'Oe 0..8 lO 0..._ r::.9~ tI:lVolU .:::: ... ... 0 .... .:::: o ~ ....~ ... 0 tI:l > ~ 0 ~ eo':::: 0 r:: Vol 0 0 ~ 0 s:: 8 '::::.o~~ U ...._ ~ == Q ;:l ... tI:l c:s C" ~~tI:l~ o - ...... o o U s:: . ~ .~ ~ 8 .- ... o o 0.. "'eo .....S 0"'0 .C E P-ceo ... o o r:: '6iJ r:: ~ .e- O o . ... s:: ~ .9 o ... ... U U tI:l tI:l 0.. 0..8 g 8 U 0 o > .0'':;: _ tI:l -- tI:l 0 .:::: ... Vol... _ s:: ~ 8 U .... tI:l 0 .00.. -fi~ r:: ... o Vol ... tI:l ... 0 ~~ - - IF) ~ ..... o o o M 00 o ..... --- ~ ~ ~ Z ;:~ o ~ E-c = - .... Z.... o S ::;~ Ne~ E-<~~ -~o =-~ -E-<i:l.; ~:E~ ~~~ ;:J~ Zo ~~ ~~ ~Q 3~ o u , ...... ---- ~ .... = Q .... = ~ = ~ = = .... = .... .... = - ~ I;: e '1: = ~u ~ e = Z = ~ .~ = .... = =.... =.o\l.l .... ~ ....= ~::; .. 05=.0 ~ = - .... :S S \I.l .... = .... 80s \I.l::; ~ \I.l e = \I.l = ~ ::; = = .... .... = =.0 .... .... ~ ...... o 8 c . ~ .~ ~ e ..... .... Q) o c.. ....~ .... ..... 0"0 ..... co .... .... ~bil .... Q) Q) c '6'0 c ~ .e- O .--. "Cl ~ = = .... .... = = ~ "-" Q) C "-2 .0 0 c 'r;; .9 = e.~ ~ Q) e "-2Q)c..' c E9 ~ 8. ~ e.9 c.. 0"-2 i- fr :; '0 ..... 8 t) ....uc...... d Q)..... 0 8 ..d = bil .... co c ..d ..... >,"-2"0 c.ocQ) .9 co ~ "-2"0- 0 0Q)c...... ....;>-"0 Q)oo>, ....:::..d c:; c.. c .... <: ~8..8 00 i:;I;:l U ~ ;:J o 00 ~ ~ == ~ ~ N ..... bil C "0 co .... bil v.i bilC c.9 .... .... e ::s Q) 08" .... Q) Q) c '6'0 c ~ .e- O Q)...... ~ 0 Q) "-2 "-2 Q) .0 bil oS _ "-2 tabil ..d c :.~ ~.9 c- . 6'0 ..8 c Q) Q)..d "-2.... - '15 10 .J!:. c .... .... 0 .~ ~ ... ~.... U '0....2 Q)J2.t:l bil "0 c < ; 8 ('f) ..... c .9 .... co .... co c.. ~ c.. "0 c co 8 v.i c co co Q) .... .... ~ co -"0 t) Q) ~"O ..... co "-2 .... bilbil c_ .....- .... co ::s...... o 0 . ~..d bil ~..d ..d..........d.... ~.~.::: ~.~ co ~ ~ co ~ 6~"O6~ ......~Q)c~ o co.~ 0 co .... i:: Q) .... Q) Q) Q) ~ Q) bil.s ..d .0 .s cooo_o .5 "0 .... ~ "0 e COco C "0 co .... co ... ...: bl) ......: ~Q)......~Q) ]Q)100Q)1O ....~~d~~ "0 bil Q) "0 bil ~ c.S 6 c.S ..... co "0 Q) co "0 .... -::: C t) -::: C ::s Q) co co Q) co 0~t:li5.~t:l . ..... \0 ....: C Q) 6 Q) t) co i5. "0 . C ~ co,> co ~B t) .... co 0 .0 'C c.. ..d C g.9 ~u ....~ _6 ta 8 Q) bil"O C co 'C 6h ::s.o o ~ . ~ - o o o r"l 00 o - ~ ~ ..., - IE - - co bil C 'C ::s o . ...., - ~ z ;:- o'i ~ 6 o-l ... z.... o g ::g~ N9~ ~~~ ~~~ -E-t~ ~~~ ~r.:l~ o~ Zo ~~ ~Cl 3~ - 0 u - ~--- .! = ~ .... o ~ = CJ o = ... = - ... =- CJ c e 'C 0 ~u ~ e = Z = ~ .~ = _ 0 =- =t)rI.l ;~ .- ..... ::g::g "'" sS=t) ~ = - 'C :S 0 rI.l .... = ... o = o.~ rI.l~ ~ rI.l t = rI.l a'i ::g = o ... - = =t) ... - ... ::g ..... o l!) u Cl . ~ .~ ~ s .- .... l!) o 0.. "'bl) Cl .... .- 0"0 'C e ~bl) .... l!) l!) Cl '6'0 Cl ~ .e- O r.; o ...;l o ~ ~ "'V,l"O = Cl 0 -= .g ,g < "0 = ~ l!)>l!)~ ....l!)..c:: = -- o..l!)l!) ~ ~E5$' o..~..o"O "0 = l!) l!)=_..c:: ..0 8 o.~ ="O..E~ = Q) - = ..c:: ..c:: ... ...~ ell V,l .A '2 Cd ~l;:l~ 6 co ...... ...... ..... -==... 0.. -= "0 ~ bl)l!)~~ .5 ~'ca l!) "0 u ....- = .- l!) .... "0 l!) > T", Cl .... l!) '-' ..... ca ~ .....; ..... o 8 Cl . =!i :l.- ~ S .- .... l!) o 0.. "'bl) c:: .... .- 0"0 .- = .... .... ~bl) I::; l!) l!) c:: '6'0 c:: ~~ O~ "0 .... >'''0 ~ c:: l!) l!) = ..0 c:: .- ..0 c:: l!) = ,.g c:: ~"O ~ 0.._ =Ol!) "00::: -0'" 0"" 0.._ = . 0 -5 l!) ~~ ~ I.;::l -d ..c:: ] .- ~ 0 = l!) ... ... ~ >,.5:< ~ "0 'OCl"O..o~;:;s=~ V,l0V,l]~~ c:: ._ l!)::.. ~... ..... ~ t).c 6) l!) ~ .- Cii ~ ~ 'S: ~ l!) 'O'.e- ~ 't 3 ~ j -= 0..0 -!i0l!) 0 l!) = .- ..0 ..0 ..... ... l!) ..c:: .~ _ _ 0 ~ ..c:: ... bl).... - -...>, o c:: c:: = c:: ..0 - = ._ ..c:: .e- l!) .... o = eIl._ ~ 0 "0 .... bl)- ~ U I:< ... l!) "0 c:: 0.. "0 ... >,,- "0 c:: = ..c:: "0 0 l!) 0..'- =o~l!)s=.~ < 6h1.;::l ~ -= = S.5 N ..... o l!) u c:: . ~ .~ ~ S .- .... l!) o 0.. "'bl) .... .5 0"0 .C e ~bl) .... l!) l!) c:: '6'0 c:: ~ .e- O E l!) "0 l!) l!) ..c:: l!) ..c:: ...... ...... ..c...... . ~ -= ~ "0 Cii ell 'r:=..o c:: :l c:: ~ = = c:: Ol!)'" = '';:: u ~ ~ E UClV,lo>, l!)=....Clbl) = "0 C::.- 0 8R~mO .... C:S l!) .... l!)=....l!)~ ... .- ~ :::<' =Cl:l~- ~:; if I-l .e- 1:<l!).........Cl 1:)C::"00:l ~ .~ ~ .e-8 l!) l!) .- .~ "0 ~ U .g ell l!) .... ,,'_ c::..o=~~ o-'E-:= l!) -.... > C; ~ .s >"- <r;eIlell..o~ M l'"-- B]~~ "O~o~ l!) .... I.;::l._ N l!) = '';; c:: S .... a) >,l!)...."O:l -bl)o~c:: l!).......I:<" ~ l!) ell I:) ~ g.~;;~< Q)~l!)"O"" "0 S ~ c:: .~ =....0== l!)BOell8 ..0 ell - .~ =~l!)t:.....o = -..c:: l!) ..c:: ... ... o....c:: ell ..c:: 0 t: So~o..o 2..o-al!) c:: ~_ ..c:: ell ell 82'" S l!) ....- E l!) c:: ell 0 ... ~8s~~ ~ ...... o o o M 00 o ...... - ~ ..... ~ Z =a~ o ~ L.. = ~ .5 Z.... o ~ ::iE~ N~~ ~~~ -C]O ~-~ -~=-. ~~~ ~~~ ~~ Zo ~~ ~~ ~~ 3~ o u ~ ----at. ~ .... = ~ .... = ~ = CJ = = .... .~ .... B - c e .C = ~U ~ a = Z = ~ .s = ....,s = rI2 .~ ~ ....= ~~ "'" .sell ~ = ~ .C .r;; ,s = .... = = !:l.= rI2~ ~ ~ rI2 ~ "'" = rI2 = ~ ~ = = .... .... = ell .... .... ~ ...... o o u = . ~ .~ ~ e .... .... o o c.. .....bQ = .... .- .9 -g ~~ .... o o = 'bb = ~ .e- U ---- 'e ~ = = .... .... = = CJ '-" =r.I'.l ~"""l3>-0 .- 0 "t:I 0 0 ep..c:: c..=r.I'.l-"..... ~ 0 ~ 0 ..... "" ~<;3 ~~g 5'0 t::l == .- ..... e 0 = !;:l c.. .... "t:I 0 ~ ~ 0 B 'S: ';;'; t1:l "t:I r.I'.l..c:: II) 0 0 o O"t:l"O ~.... .... c..~a....oc..o >- ~- 0 bQ== 0 .c,,>-,...~t1:lN "".c -......c::.- = _ _ ~.ta r.I'.l e o - \J ~.... .- ';;'; ~ ~ .9< "t:I ~ .S 8 ~~:= ~~ ~ S Ot1:l~.cr-<...o ~ > ~ .... ..... ~ ="'r.I'.lt:' .~= o-o~=r.I'.lo . > ~.c ~ .9 0._ 0 ~r.I'.l"t:lot)e~g. c.. ~:; ~ B ~ .9<<;3 000=0 ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ C5.. B :.s i.'3 >< ~ o ....:l o ~ ~ ..;. ....., ...... o o u = . ~ .~ ~ e .- .... o o c.. .....bQ = .... .- .9 -g ~~ 00 >-..... .e- .~...... .~ r.I'.l "t:I 0 .~ ~ ...... 0 ..... =._ .... 0 r.I'.l 0 0'- 0 e .- 0 u 0 r.I'.l .... ~ =...... =..... t1:l = ~ c.. 0 ..... ~.- u = r~ 1=4 0.... (f) _ .... 0 v ::s c...~ 8 0 .- 0 ~ o .... = = "t:I 1=4 "t:I S _ B .- ._ "t:I ..c:: > ...... t = e 0 U bQ >- bQ 0 -.....- t1:l ~ > 0 S .t:: r.I'.l._ - c...J:: o o.!:l = ':l = =.-:> 0 ~ 0 r.I'.l UQQ~<l:.;~::J~...(f)UQLL: (f) r.:l U ~ ;:;J o (f) ~ ~ ...:l CS - ~ o ...:l o - ~ == ........... 0 ~ = 0 "~ .t: .s 0 .c t1:l.J:: ~ ~ _.-t <L)..... .... =' .c r.I'.l - "t:I c........ r.I'.l .....~o~::s o~ ~ ~~U~r.I'.lo ..... "t:I ~ o.s.- r5 S = = 0'1 .t:: _ C5 8 = ~ ~ 00 r.I'.l ca.t:: ::s.9 c..o t)~5r.1'.lWn = ~ 0 0 e 0._ o .s '0' = .s .t:: ';j B ~ ~ _ S -t1:l......-c......O ." 0 0 .... = .!:!l 0 0 ';j::S 0 ......... .J::'~ ~ r.I'.l .- .- U == ......c:: bQ = ..... e t1:l r-< ';j 0 ~ "t:I = .- 0 "t:Ia....o eB~ o 0 . .... := ~r.I'.l"t:l"t:l"t:ld .so "t:I~000 o >0 B a t1:l:= 6b';j "t:I .- - c.. t1:l._ t1:l S ~..... 0..... r.I'.l 0 .A'o......~....oo.... ...... .... 0 ~ c.."t:I "t:I U ~ ..... o o o M 00 o ..... ~ ~ ....., ..... ...., ~ - = I::l .... = ~ = C.I = = ... = - ... = - C.I a= e .C = ~u ~ - e = Z ~ Z Ea~ o ~ L. = ~ .s Z'il ~! N8~ E-~~ =sa~ -E-c~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ Zo ~~ =: ~~ 3~ - 0 u - ~ ---- = ~ .s = -,g ~fI) ... ~ - - ...... .- ~~ ... tSCi) ~ = - ... :S l:i fI) _ = ... = = =-= ~~ =: fI) t = fI) = ~ ~ = = ... - = Ci) ... - ... ~ ...... o 8 C . ell :3 ::S.- ~ S .- .... 0) o c.. ....bI) C .... .- 0'"0 .- ell .... .... ~bI) .... 0) 0) C '6b &i .e- u --. ~ ~ = = ... - = = C.I "-' '"0 d:s,.c ~ 0) :3 d ..!.. '"0 0) bI) bI) C '--"~ o::E.- 0 '"0 O).t:: C C ell '"0 ~ CeIl.....- 0) i:: ~ 'u 'C .0 ell <I.l:-=O~<I.lO)"""C::S ::s bI)'"O t) ell eo;;, - 0 <I.l 0 0) '"0 . .... C 0).- > '"0 ca 1:=0 0) eo;;, "-l C t) 'C 1:) ~ ell 0) .... 8 ~ '"0 C eIl.9 "-l....O)eIl ~'"O~...... 00).... :> ::s .... -a bI) C._ bI) c._.... t) o 8 8 .5 0)...... C 0) ell ~ ell 2 - 0 c.. ~ t) e O'-.t:: .... 0) .... ~ ce ':::<I.l.o~"-l~ ~.;J~-5.B0~~S2S~8 c.... ::s:> ~ ~ 0) t).-.... ....~:::::<I.lo~O).... "-l1<c'"O 0) 1:=0 ell ~ <I.l 0) "".- C -5 :.= ~ gf 5.i .~~ "'8 ~ -5 ~ "-l~ '"0 ell g ~ O)'u.~ ~ ell c.. 0:3 ~ C "-l ca.t:: C ~ C .e- s c::g ,5 ::S.9 ...... <I.l .B ~ eIl:.=':'- ~:E 0) ~ o g ~ >.. ~ ti.- C C eIl.o ~ "-l ell .... "'" ....:9 0) 0 c,.c 0 c.. ~.... e bb,.c.~ >.- .... '"0 ~ 0) ~S.9ocbI)>~~~CeIl~ ell S .... c..'u'c,.c c.. ~ .... ~ ::::: =3 .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ g 1? ~ .~ 'G., t) t) .... eo;;, ._ _ r-' 1:=0 <I.l ~ <I.l <I.l 00 ~ U ~ ;:J o 00 ~ ~ ~ - ~ o ..::l o - == ~ ...... o 0) t) C . ~ .~ ~ S .- .... 0) o c.. ....bI) .....5 0'"0 .C E ~bI) 0\ .... 0) 0) C '6b &i .e- U ....,"o."-l0)0).... oO)~~::s,.co ....O)t)c.....- ~.t:: ;;:.E 0) '"0 gfe O)j:;cc :.;;: ~ >........:.E~ ;; ~"'8 -g ~ .~ ~ c...o ~ ca:.= bI) .... - ~] ~ ~ 8 S~'~ 8 <I.l 0) '';:: ~ t)....'"Oscec~. eIlcO)c..Oell.!.. 0) t) .- c.. .... C S C &'"0 0) g ~ o c...B 0) 0) .... '-" ell '';:: 'S ~ c...... '"0 t)0'" Cell ,5c ::s 0) 0) 0 c.. 0) .- ell 1:: ...... -5 '';:: .t:: ~ -a ~o t)O)"-l,.c::s 8 ~ C .5.0 bI) '"0 '"0 ~._ "-l _ C C 0) .... ,.c C -.- ell '"0 Zo .9'~8~ ~-ae <I.l~ <I.l'"O::Sbl) ~ ...... o o o M 00 o ...... -- J:Q ..... M ~ = Q .... 0 ~ = (,J 0 = ... = .... ... = - (,J c e .J: 0 ~u ~ e = z - e,:, ...... ...... 0 0 z ~ --- 8 8 "C 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ = = = E-4 = = ::s .... ::s ~ 's 's - ... Q = '" '" z .... .~ .~ = ~s .... .... 0 8 = rIl ll) ll) :E .~ ~ .8 0.. o 0.. '-' .... - bll .... bll N~~ ~~ .... .5 .... .5 0'0 0'0 .... = .... = .... .... .... .... E-4~e,:, ~bll ~bll -e,:,O 0 ~-~ -E-4~ ...... :I:_ ~:Ee,:, "'" ~r.:lg: .s .... .... ~ ~ ll) ~~ ~ = ll) - .J: 0 0 Zo ,Q '6'0 '6'0 .... 0 ~~ rIl .... 0 0 = .... ~ ~ o = Q,O .e- .e- rIl:E ~~ ~ u u 3~ ~ 0 U ~ ---- rIl ~ "'" = rIl = ~ :E = o ... .... = ~ ... .... ~ --- "Cl ~ = = ... .... = o (,J '-' '0 ll) 0 ll) = 0 -sa ti ~ 9-.5.5 ~ll) 1: c:f-sa o ."'= 0 ..c:: ....... .,-, .., ".. - H 0 ... = "'.... .... ll) .... .~ - ll) .... ~." liS.... = lfl 00 p ~ "2 0 ~ "' "'.9- 0 6 ........ '" .., ... _ oJ 0 >.'::: .... 0 ll). U co 0.. 0 ll) '0 U 0.0 's -g ........;:: .... 5 0 2 = ~ ~.~ 0 B .5 ~ '3 8 = ~ 2 ~ ~ tl ~.g e '0 0 = ~ = .g '" 0.. c:f 0 O.S: ll) 5 0 ;; .... ll)'';:: ~::s = ~ 0..;::.... t:: '" U U '" .... '0 ~ ~ 6..c:: ....0 U 0.... = 0.. ll) >. bll...... 0 =-ll) "',.. "'~= ..c::0000ll) .... 0 .... ti 0 ~ co S ll) .... .; O'i: .... 6 co ll) =,.. 0 lfl.9 .... '" 0.. 0 ........ ::s 0.... ......6 =~",_....oo ~'Oll)'O o .... '0 ll) - ::s 0 ~ .!:: .... "';;.l ll).... 6 ll) '0 0 .0 0.. '" ......c:: ~ ll) ...... :E -= ll) ~ ll).~ Oll)== =ll)"'bll..c::O::SO_~u-o o '" +:: = ... ll)...... .5.... 0.... .-:.:::: = 'Vi .... ll) ..c:: 6 0 ~ .... .... "':> = .... Q. 0 8~~"'~.,,00 OOll)~""oo~ 0 .., ... - = ~ ~ . _ ll) .... ll) ::s ll)'" 0.... - 0 i: ..... ll) ..c:: .... ll) C".... ~ . 0 ~ ~ 0.. 0 ~ 0.._.0 .... ~ u ll).... 0.."" CO ll) ",..;:: ....... ~ ~ 0 bll "':: ... '" ~ 0 0.... .... .., = "' - '0 ... '" ...::: .0 ...... - ='~.",= = > ... ..,.... ..c::........... ..., ... 0 0 y. :>.-... ..c:: ~ '" lfl :.= ~ ll) oJ .... U '" ~ ~ .... ........ v. ..,........ '" .... ::s ~ u ~ 0 '" 0 ... ... ::s.... .... ll)'O 'EQ.~'O'O~ E = .......- ~ ..c:: 0 0 0....... 0 0...... ll) .... ~ ~~.2" g ~ .. .... = u = '0 = = ll) bll 0 = ll) 0.. 0 .... .... 00 r.:l U c:z:: ~ o 00 r.:l ~ ..::l c:s - e,:, o ..::l o - ~ -.:i B~~~o1{3-='E~ .... .... '::: .... 0 ....~ ll) 0 ~'O >,'O"'u ~ 6..c:: '0 e.o e 0 ::s ll) o..'~ .... bll'O bllV'l '" .&'3 ~ o ~ll)""""""'0..C" 8 5~ ~ = ti----ll) ll) = .... .... ... '0 ~ ~ ."'= ......~ "'.a ll) u.... 0 ~ '0 .... ll) ~ ~.... .... 0...... = = .0 :.:::: S -g .9'';:: 0 o go = ll) "'.... ..c:: g '0 o....~.s:=ll)ll)~....ll) '" o..",~.o~ s~ ~ ~ ll) '" ._ =.~o .... ...,......."'_.... 8ll) =........ 0 ='3 0.. 0.. '" 6 bll..c:: '" 0 0 6 ~:.::::'Vi '" ..c:: 0.. ............ bJ) fn b.Q.... "'-" ll) ~.5 :.5'~ u g'O ~."'= ~ "'> 'O....ll)....~~~ ~Suouc:ll) :E '0 .e- '0 ll).",= ll) ~ o = 0 u.... 0 'E ..c:: B ..c:: E-- ..c:: = =.... ~ '" '" -- ~ ll) ll).o '" .... = 0 .0 c:: ><; ...... o o o M 00 o ...... -- j:Q '"'"" v) - - ~ Z ~,-. o~ ~ 6 - ... z.... o ~ ~~ N~~ ~<~ =~~ -~~ ~~~ r.:lr.:l~ ;:J~ Zo ~~ r.:lCl 3~ - 0 u - ~....... ~ .... = Q .... = ~ = CJ = = ... = .... ... =- CJ !5 a "'" = ~u ~ a = Z = ~ .s = ....,5 ~fIl ... ~ ....- ~~ "'" tSei) ~ = - .C :S = fIl.... = ... = = c.= fIl~ ~ ~ fIl ~ = fIl = ~ ~ = = ... .... = ei) ... .... ... ~ ,-. '0 ~ = = ... .... = = CJ '-' .... E! >. c ~ c 8 ~ ~ .~~o "t:) ~ ~ ~ c:l...9 c rG 0.9 ~ -=eo 0.... ......~"t:).,; o ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ Ci ~ ";j"t:) c:l..~ > C ~.";:i 8~8!!3 g; l! .S 'C5 ~~]] ~ -e ~o_:s o"t:)-.... .- C ~ ~ l:i..;s ~ :.0 00 r.:l U ~ ;:J o 00 ~ ..::l ~ - ~ o ~ o - ~ ...... o 8 c . ~ .~ ~ E! .- ~ o o c:l.. ....bO C ~ .- .9 "i P::6'o t.:'~-;:; 0... 0 geE! .- :s c:l.. bO ~ 0 ~ c ~ _ 0 ~E!ot> .e- >0 ._ 0 0.= UUQQ e-"t:) 0- ....0...E:>t3 E! 0 bO"t:) .- .~ .=.0 ~ C :s ~ 0 -=.S ~ e~::::::e ~""~ .... 00 ~eW e......~rG ~ .... [:;>..c ~ Cl)...... ~ "t:) 0 e "8 ...J ::a ~ 0 VJ ..9 0 0 0 c:: ~ .~ _-....VJe"" ....>~O~bO 'ii ~ e.~.,g..c ~ g. ~ ~ -= ~ ..9 "t:) .~.~ ~.g c: ~ 0 B ~ e .9 e .- ~ .- - 0 >. ~ 0 - 0 .0 o~ t>~~~~oo"t:)o"t:) ~-~""bO~ .o_OVJQ ~ ee ...... -e~lC t3 "t:) ~ ~ 0'';:: 0 - 0 ~ 0 :.= o e "t:).- E! VJ ..c .... VJ "t:) oil ~ ~~o"t:) O....:>..VJ ee:S c:l.. VJ """ e 0 e ""'- 0 ";j ~._ C" E! .... 0 bO..c bb e ~ 0 > .0 ~ ~ .- S ..c .... c02 l:= 0 ~ c:l.. .- .... ..c .- Cl) E! e!!3 >. 8 ~...... ~.9"8 ~ ~ .S Cl) ~ 'C5 .0 :s..coo oo~"t:)~.o "t:) "t:) c: 5 ~ ] 1) .0 ..c S cu"' ~ -g .~ ~ Cl)'- ";j 0 bO ~ bO 0'-::: _ ~ i::;:: 0.... .- c ~ :s """ VJ - t:. ~ .;s ...:-::._ :s 0 .... ~ ~ O'~ 0 0 VJ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 VJ._ - f-4 "i '> <: ~ ~ 15 -= ~ -= g ~ ~ ..J:) ...... o 8 ~ .,; ~ .~ .- ~ o o c:l.. ....bO C ~ .- O"t:) .C E ~bO ...... ...... ~ Cl) Cl) c 'So e ~ .e- U .e-' 'OVJ~~.... .- 5 -;.0 8 ~ ~ 8 Uo:o~o~:.=o -g ~ S ~ l:i....... ~ "t:) ~>_rGVJbOOCl)W .~ 0 e .... ~.~ '" ",'~.- e "" ~ .e- - ..c:.";:i e 0 VJ == c"t:)....13eE! ~o 8:s ~ ~JS-a8 ~JS ~ ,P ~ 0 ~ t3 - 0 0 -'- Cl) eCl)~..cc:l..E-= -=O::Et>....OVJO .~ E!.- .... bO..c ~ .... ~ t:: c .... bO_ ~ ... .....- e "" ~ 0 VJ ~ '!;i'- c e c:l..c:l..~:S..c c:l..~ o Cl) VJ.t:l"t:).... E! ~ '';:: "t:) ~ c "t:) 0 :s rG ~ ~ .- Cl) ~ c:l.. e .S rG VJ...... c:l..:s :.= "t:).- ~ 0 0 VJ ~ ~oo....-c~.e- o B t> e ~ 0.-:.= 8bO~Cl)0 e..;:: ~l:=E!"t:).9"t::l:s ~ ...... o o o ('f") 00 o ...... - ~ ...., r..: ill ~ Z ;~ o ~ L.. = ~ .S Z..... o g ~~ N~~ ~~~ :::::~o --Cl:: -~~ ~S;~ r.:lr.:l~ ~~ Zo ~~ ~Q 3~ o u -=--........ ~ '" Q .... 0 ~ 1:1 c:.J 0 C .... '" .... .... '" - c:.J c e 'C 0 ~u ~ e ~ 1:1 ~ .S 1:1 .....,5 ~rIJ .... ~ ...= :i~ '" .s~ ~ c - .... ,Q '" -r;i S c .... o 1:1 ~~ ~ rIJ e = rIJ '" ~ 1:1 o .... ..... '" ~ .... ..... .... ~ ,-.. i = c .... ..... 1:1 o c:.J '-' "0'" B.~ ~~ .!:P..c:: <Ii ~"O," .... c:l "O~~ ~-= ~ '€ ~"O 8..o~ g.~:.o <I:l ..9 ~ ~ Q).5 ~ -= ... ~ .... to) c:l ..a .~ :Ec:l8 ....~ 0 0.. .... ....ce~ ;:j .!:p ... ~.-::: .... oS..a 00 r.:l U Cl:: ~ o 00 ~ ~ ...::l c5 - ~ o ....:l o - == ...... o 8 c:l <Ii ~ ... .~ -g Q) o 0.. "'bI) .....9 0"0 'C e ~bI) >-a...... .... CI:I · ...c:l....B"O .... Q) 0 ~ ~ c:l S .... ~ 8 ;:j ... en .~ 0.. to) "0 r:. S.9iU"O~Q) sQ)....Q) en > .-:::..c:: o Q).... c:l <I:l Q) uoo::>~~ B ~ S i: ~ i ~ ~ a B .~ .~.... c:l 0.. _ Q) - .... -g;:j<~-~..c::tS~.... ...... .... "0 '-" ~ iU.... .t:: Q).c 0 ObllQc:l ..c::~~eno..<I:l <I:l ~ 0 c:l ... 0.. c:l ~ "0 .~ c:l~_~~""<I:lo"OQ)'"'" .9 ... ~ Q) ..c:: ..a <I:l'f! 5 .... ~ ... - '"'" <I:l.... .... '" ... ;:j - s g Q) bllg]-=.:g; ~O"<I:l ~ <I:l.o .5 <I:l c:l "0 <I:l ~ ~.~ ..",... .... ......~ c:: CI:I ~ Sr5.....0"Q)s;:j8r5Q).... Q) .... ~ <I:l ..c:: ~ 0 0 .0 ...... o..'~ 0 "i:'''' ~ 6.l as Q) >>0 cU S'';:: S B ~ I .-::: c:l ~ Q) .-::: .... to) Q) ~,,-... ~ <I:l iU S to) <I:l ~....-Q) Q).o c:lQ) Q) .......s~o..c::_.-:::~-= ..c::as.3-....._~=~S-ec:l .... ........ -'~ 0 ~ .... ;:j 0 ... .0 - ..c::'~ ~ 00 Q) ... "0 e ~ 8:: bll ~ "0 ~ 0...5!a .... "3~..c::_;:j.o<l:lB ,,-..."Os o 0.. 0 2:'" ~ ~ .... ..c:: (l) "0 Q).... Q) to) en '-" >>.0 00 Q.~-=-= ~~..9::>~ ~~ ex; - ...... o 8 c:l <Ii ~... ~'s .... .... Q) o 0.. "'bll .....5 0"0 'C e ~bll C'l ...... .... Q) Q) c:l '6'0 c:l ~ .e- o B~"O~~a~ .~.::: Q) ... Q).....c c:l ~ l:: bll~ tS ~ o Bc:lo 2.0 ......<I:lQ)_ t;...... 0-g"O~<lic:l0 Q)~ "0"00 O-=~iUc:lO~ c:liU......c::~iU;:J ~~c:l~~..c::iU .... Q).o~"'..c:: ;:jQ) ~ Q)'" t;.-::: c:l~ t; Q) "0 a; :.a~o(l)~..ato) 0'';:: Q) ..c:: g c:l ~ ~ .0 ... .... .B S .... ~= ......0 >>~ c:l s::; ~ ~ c:l .E 8 8-5.1 <I:l s:.= ...~ <I:l Q) <I:l.5 - --.-. "" .C "" .... "0 .... ~ .... ~ S~tS~"O~~ :.= Q) <I:l c:l <I:l '"'" "0 '0' ~ ;:j ~ ~ ~c:l....gog...... ['"""'~o..s::;.os::;o ...., ><; ...... o o o M 00 o ...... - ~ ..... oi ...." - C-' Z ;- o'i ~ ; ~ .... z.... o g ~~ N~~ ~~C-' :::::C-'9 --~ ~~~ ~~C-' r.:l~~ ~~ Zo ~~ ~~ 3~ ,-- 0 u -....... ~ = Q .... o ~ = I;J o = ; .! B- 5 e "" 0 ~u ~ e = Z Cl ~ .~ Cl ....3 ~(Il .. ~ .... .... ~~ "" .s ~ ~ Cl -.... :S S (Il .... Cl .... o Cl l:l.o (Il~ ~ (Il t = (Il = ~ ~ = o .... .... = ~ .... .... ~ - ~ ~ = Cl .... .... Cl o I;J '-' .... ~ ~ ~ .... o OO~ oo~ ........."O~ ~~ ~...... ~ "0 t:lh ~......Or:lor:l .- 0 Cf.l ..........a 15 d ~,.g -g 8 ~"Ot~::s '.::f 8 ~ 0 +:: "0 1;J8....r:l~~ ~~~~~Cf.l C,,)_ ::s ~ e Q.,o.....~..... ~ .~ ~~~-g~-g ~-5-5~0~ C,,) Cf.l ..... r:l ::s .... 00"0 r:l 0 Cf.l 0 r:l r:l ~.- .~..9 ~ C,,) ~ r:l~~~+::~.... o~ ~:.a'..... '';:: 0 ~ ~ ~.S ~ r:l ~ ~ ~ C,,) ..... 0 "0 ..... ~ .- ~.~ "E 'Vi ..... :0 ~ 0 0 r:l...... ::s > Q.,.o 0 0 Q., r:J:l r.:l U ~ ::> o r:J:l ~ ~ ~ C-' o ....J o - ~ ...... o ~ C,,) r:l . ~ .~ ~ 8 .- .... ~ o Q., .....00 r:l .... .- .9 "'g P::6'o ...... o 8 r:l . ~ .~ ~ 8 .- .... ~ o Q., ..... 00 r:l ~:.a 'C ~ ~6'0 >...... ..... r:l ~ r:l e ::s Q., 00.... i=< _ 0 e ~ t> > ~ o ~ .!:: UQQ .... ~ ~ r:l '6'.0 r:l ~ .e- U Cf.l ~...... ..... "0...... Cf.l~ J^ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 r:l ~ 0 ~.- i.o ..... ~ = ~ ~ t> ~.::: as .0 = ~.~ Cf.l Q., ~ Cf.l Cf.l r:l ctI ~ ..... ~::s f;:l::S~~o~r:l - ~ > i=< Cf.l ~ ~r:l~""'''''~r:lCl)~ 0 !:: .... ~ r:l .s:::::.- C,,) ^~ ... ~..... ~ ~ ~ c::....... 1;i -5 ~ .....0 ~ .- Q., "0 r:l o::s.t::l ~ = .,; ~ ~ > ~ ~ o Cf.l ~ B ~ r:l ~.- ~ Cf.l ....."o~~~~ ~ ~I::S€ -::: ~ Q.,,:::,, Cf.l Q., ~ _ r:l 0 ~ ... r:l - ~ ~ .... ....- ~._ ~ ::l .- Q.,.o ~ ~.o ::s ~ .;g _ e as ~ 0 e.c o.g ...... ~ _..... Q., C,,) ..... .... ~ .....,; "O....~.....Cf.lCf.l ~Q.,....~""" ~~-5 ~-g~O ~UQ.,.;g ~ " - ~ -- .- 00.....~"O.....~0 Cf.l .0 r:l ..... r:l::S r:l ~..... ~ ~ .- "0'- ~ CI) ..... ~ Cf.l "0 r:l "0 ~ ~ r:l i9 . g ~ '0 ~ ~ C,,) ~ 0 rt.l ....... Cf.l .- Q.,'- "0 Cf.l ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ r:l .0 r:l "0......0 >.- .....- ctI 8'- ~ r:l'Vi ::S.- C,,) Q., C,,) ~ ~ ._ ~ +:: =.........~ ~C,,)- 0" .~...... C,,) ~ Q., r:l Q., ::l'B .... .... ~ _ 0 Cf.l r:l Cf.l 0 Cf.l Cf.l i=< 0 Q., ~ ~.B ~ ~~...... ::: .- .~ ~ ~ 0 "'-Cf.l....."O ~"Ol:f:: ~ Cf.l - ......N""" >.'~ 0 0.- r:l ~ ~ :-::: -ca 8~B~=t: 00 .::: 0 ~ i9 .S .~ ..... 8 .0 0 ..... Cf.l r:l - C,,) ~~8....-;j~ :.= Cf.l.~ 0 ~ ~ ..... "O~Cf.l"'" ~5~r:l~00 .~ o.:::.S r:l Cf.l ..... N :3 ~ ~ ~ .- ~C,,) 1;iE~ ~ ~-E .~ ~ 0 i8~~~g .- ~ 00.... Cf.l r:l ~ ~ ~ ...:- -;j .~ ~ ~.....;g....~.o ~ ~.- ::s 0'- -~~1;i=~ ..::l~~r:l..E.B o ..... ..... ..... M ..... ><; ..... o o o M 00 o ..... - ~ ..... ~ Z E2~ o ~ L.. ::I ~ .S Z= o 8 :?1- N~~ ~~~ =~9 --.-c -~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ Zo ~~ ~~ ~~ a~ o u ..-:~. ......... ~ .... = ~ .... 0 ~ = CJ 0 C ... = .... ... = - CJ = e ... "" 0 ~u ~ a ~ = ~ .S = ......s = r'-l .r:fJ ~ .... - .,.. .""" :?1:?1 "" ,sell ~ c - ... :S S r'-l .... = ... o = =-.0 ~:?1 ~ r'-l t ::I r'-l = ~ :?1 = o ... .... = ell ... .... ~ -. 'e ~ ::I = ... .... = o CJ - I ~---- ~ ..= C';l C';l o.~ E E -""'i'Q)Q) -~""'l< C 0.5 Q) - u; ~c....... t..-4 c~oo Q) s ~bI)~ ~ ~.5 .0 'S S:E..9 C'" ~ . ~ bI) Q) ..= . .... "" Q) ~ ~~M.sB ',p .... '-" t) ..=..... ,-Q) bI)"" oe:::l .... .... Q) ~oo bI).... C';l .... c:: Q) ~ "" ~''''::I ]~j!~g' 8.5 8. ~ g- rI.l ~ u ~ ;J o rI.l ~ ~ ~. u - ~ o ..J o - ~ bI) = "0 C';l .... bI) .A bl)C:: c::.9 ..... .... e ::I Q) og- >...... ..... c:: Q) c:: S ::I c.. .... S 0 0 s"Q)t) > Q) o Q).:= uoo rI.l ~ u ~ ;J o rI.l ~ ~ ..J ~ ~ ~ ;J u -obl)"".....d Q) c:: 8'~ 0 ~:a .... ~.,p >C';l::l_t) 8~~2& c:: ~ C';l "" ::I ~ "5.5 "" Q) .... Q) Q) c:: "" C';l ..... .... .9 ~ "0 .;;; C';l ~ ..... Q) c:: .... u:: 0 ~ &~::::: c:: t) 0.... C';l C';l .... ....::1.... ::I Q) C'" 0 obl)~C';l~ ""c::t) "0 ~.... c:: -g Q) ] ::I C';l!-E ";j....""Q)o .... bI) c:: "" c:: ,g .9 gj Q) ::I~~t).o u.c t) ~ ~ '- ::I c....=..= _"00"""" ...; bI) c:: ..... "0 C';l .... bI) .A bl)C:: c:: .9 ..... .... e ::I Q) og- >...... ..... c:: Q) c:: S ::I c.. dO.... 1:0 _ 0 SQ)t) > ~ o Q) ..... uoo --0'- ";j c:: 0 ..= C';l ""..... "" ....0 Q) 0..... ~ go ~ ::I .... ~ 0--..... ~~~ .....9 ~ - "" C';l "" ~ ~ Q) . .....0..=Q) _........."0 ::I c.. . .;;; t) C';l .... "0 "=Q) "' c:: .~.::: 5:'; ~~ > Q) ~ o :9 "0 .~ t) .... Q) c:: ~~"O""o Q)....~ >'''0 0 ::::: ~2~a N ..... bI) c:: ..... "0 C';l .... bI) .A bl)C:: c::.9 ..... .... e ::I Q) og- ~ ....-l >...... ..... c:: Q) c:: S ::I c.. dO.... 1:0 _ 0 S Q) t) > ~ o Q)..... uoo l5 ~ ~ .-::: '0 "0 c:: > '0 o c:: S..... -g = ~ "" C';l..= "" ~.....";j ..... ~ r.fj ~ 'bo.~ 2 C';l ..9'~ S o ',p C t) 8 . o C';l C';l l3 ~ bI) t:: 's ~.5 2 ::I "O"OQ)e- Q) e c:: C';l u:: bI) Q) ..... ..... t) c:: ";j _ 0 Q) ::I - ~ S C'" ~'a) :a <8P:;~ - ><; ..... o o o M 00 o ..... - ~ ~ M - e,:, Z ;:--- o1S E-o S ~ .... z.... o ~ ~~ N~~ E-o~e,:, S~~ ~~~ ~~e,:, ~~2S ;:J~ Zo ~~ ~~ ~Cl 3~ - 0 u ~ ---- ~ .... = Cl .... 0 ~ = C.J 0 I: .... = .... .... = - C.J = e 'C 0 ~u ~ e = Z = ~ .~ = ....,g = fIJ .~ ~ ...= ~~ ... cE~ ~ = - .... ,Q ... .... 0 fIJ .... = .... o I: l:l.o ~~ ~ fIJ ~ = fIJ = ~ ~ = o .... .... = ~ .... .... ~ bO d .... "'0 tI:l ..... bO <Ii bOd c::.9 .... ..... e ;:l ~ 08' >>.... .... d ~ c:: E ;:l 0.. EO..... _ 0 E ~ t) > Q) o ~.:= uoo --- "C ~ = = .... .... I: o C.J '-' ~.,;()~ tI:l c:: """ 'ff .9 ~ .i: ~ ~ tI:l ~ ..... ~ fIJ t)~t)"'O ..... 0-- d g ~ tI:l fIJ bO..c ~ ~ d fIJ d ......- fIJ 0 "'0 d'';:: tI:l 0 tI:l ......- ;:l tI:l bO~_ t) ..... tI:l .- bO ~ > bOC::o..~ ..9'C 0 ~ o ;:l bO c:: """'0 c:: 0 <Ii d ._'';:: ~ o "'0 "'0 t) t) ~~eg,:; tI:l ~ bO fIJ 0 0..> C::fIJ o ~ .- ~ t) ~ ~ ..... .....d..c..c..... _;:l........0 rI':I ~ u ~ ;:J o rI':I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :::5 ;:J u ~ bO d .- "'0 tI:l ..... bO <Ii bOd c::.9 .... ..... e ;:l ~ 08' >> .... .... d ~ c:: E ;:l 0.. EO..... _ 0 E ~ t) > ~ o ~.... uoo o = ~ ~ ~ tI:l.9 e ~ 0 ~..cd~ 5.-;:'- "'0 ~ ~ ....- ~ ~ ~ .0 d ..... > ;::::: 0 2.~ ~ '';::: .s .J:j fIJ B ~ "'0 . - ..c 2 ~ t) tI:l ~ .5 ~ - ~ "'0 "0 ~d t)t)~tI:l fIJ'- d :=:Co~ fIJ ...._ tI:l . fIJ oJ .....- E r.80..~~~ - .g~iii <tI:l~E~ tri bO d .... "'0 tI:l ..... bO <Ii bOd d.9 .... ..... e ;:l ~ 08' ..... ~ ~ d '6iJ d ~ .e- U rI':I U - E-o ~ =: ~ rI':I ~ < "'0 ~ ~..c "'0.... .S;: o d ......... 0...9 ~.~ .0 ~ ~ ~ ~ tI:l ~ 5 ~ .... "'0 ..!.. ~ ~ 0 .!:P ~..!. t::~..c . ... "'0 bO .... d.C d tI:l fIJ g - ~~ E~~ ..... tI:l ~ d 0 ~.... ..... ...... ..... o ~ > <Ii 8 ~ 0..- 0..0.. tI:l d bO O'{;; .... ~ "'0 ..... .9 ~ ..... d ~lQ ..... ~ ~ d '6iJ d ~ .e- U V) ..... 13~i::~ ........ ~ E t) E.... ~ ._ .0 0 .:=.s E ~ "'OEtI:l~ ~ "'0 .009.... .... '" t) !i~ t)..... tI:l tI:l 0.. E bO ~ .... "'0 c::..ct)- -.;:: ~...-.4 ::s -fo "'0 ~ 8 ._ .......c -tI:l.... .... ~ ~.... ~ ~ 0 tI:l tI:l 0 ~...._..c.... ..... tI:l.... tI:l ~ "'C -.= r: ... d ~ ~;2.:c15 ~.s 8.~o - ~2 ..c .... fIJ fIJ N ~ ..... o o o M 00 o ..... - P=l ~ ~ z ~- o~ ~ 6 - .... z- o S ::E~ N~~ ~~~ -~o ~-~ -~i=-c ~:;~ ~r.:l~ ~~ Zo ~~ ~ ~~ 3~ o u ;:--- ---- ~ - ell Q .... 0 ~ = Cj 0 = .... .s - ell - Cj c 5 .C 0 ~u ~ e ell Z = ~ .$il = _ 0 ell - c.l)rI.l .... ~ - - ~~ .. tSc.I) ~ = :i5 .C .... 0 ~;o.:: o = =..~ rI.l~ ~ rI.l ~ .. = rI.l ell CI.l ~ = o .... - ell c.I) .... - ~ ...... o - ~ <Ii 8 ;; 2:0.. ell c:: 00 o.Vi .... 0 -0 ....- .9 ell .... c:: ~!..::l .... o o c:: .6'0 c:: ~ .e- U u - ~ ~ ~ E-o o 0 .l:l~ = c:: ell 00 -5 .Vi 0...... = 0 c:: 0 o <I) < = <Ii o-e ......c:: = .~ .... u =..c::-o 8 ~~ 008-0 c::..c::B o .... c:: -; -0 .Cil 000Q.. c:: t) .... :.;;l .C .Q ........-0 ell <I) c:: ~ ~ ell . - ...... o -::: .... <Ii ~ c:: .... ell 2:0.. ell c:: 00 o.Vi .... 0 -0 ....- .9 ell .... c:: ~!..::l .... o o c:: ..... 00 c:: ~ .e- U <I) .... .... .- ~.~ l!f = .- ~8 U ell ~~ <I) > 00 .......- c:: O-E;.9 .... ell o ~ ~8t3 8 ell ~ \0 c:: S ......OQ.. 000 ~Q) S 0 ~ =.l:l-o S -0 . .8 ~ "' g ....... __ "'*I = S = ~ 0 C"'.... > ~~c.2< N ...... o ~ <Ii 8 ;; 2:0.. ell c:: 00 o.Vi .... 0 -0 ....- .9 ell .... c:: ~!..::l .... o o c:: .6'0 c:: ~ .e- U o ...... -0 0000 ~.e-~ 00._ 'Vi .S U 0 -g.> ~ ell <I) oooc:: c:: -= 0 's.. c:: 0 ~:E ~ <I).... -g .~ ell ~ - -0 ." ...... 0 ~ 0.",::: > .... S.- ..c:: ..... ..!:: 00- 'oJ 'v 0 ..c::.l:l 0- ~~ ~ i> l;I,:l:'= '" .- O.l:l U'- ~ .~ - c:: o .... .... u =' .... .... <I) c:: o U <Ii c:: o l!f'~ .- .... .... 0 ~Q.. ~ 0 \0 ...... .... o o c:: '6'0 &J .e- U r.:l rr., - o Z 0-0 :'0 .... B ~.~ .....S - i:: ~~8.s ell 0 ,~ 0 .......l:l .... ~ -0 - <I) U :]S~;; c:: <I) S ~ c:: o <I) cli >-.- ..::;: ~ ~"E ell = 0._ 0 .... 0.... &] f' ~.~ 0-='0 ~U o = >- c:: -0_ y.> O.l:l O' -.... ..... fi1 =..c::-o t)....o....o =' oo..c:: >--5 .t:c::o~~ '" ''::;: ..c:: c::.l:l c:: '" .... 0 ell 8 'B s ~ ij ~ ...... o o o M 00 o ...... - co ....., - ...... - - ~ Z Ea- 01$ Eo-< 6 - .... Z- o g ~~ N~~ E-<~~ =~o --Cl::: ""'Eo-<~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ Zo ~~ ~~ 3~ - 0 u '!I"'!"""'" --- ~ - = ~ .... o ~ = ~ o = ; .! =- ~ !5 e ... 0 ~u ~ a = Z = ~ .s = -s ~rn .... ~ - - :E:E ... .set) ~ = - .1: :S 0 rn _ = .... o = Q.,O ~~ ~ rn t = rn = ~ ~ = o .... - = et) .... - ~ b.O = .... "0 cC .... b.O v.l b.O= =.9 - .... e :;j Q) og. .... ~ = 'eo = l:.Ll a tJ ~ ::s -< ~ 01 ~ ..... < Q) .... .0 0 ::= b.O cC = .J:: .... v.l ~ - - o cC .l:: ~ v.l = .... Q) o cC ~ 0- v.l _ :;j cC v.l b.O Q) .g~s Q).J::o .~ gf.l:: .<;:: 0 = b.O....o =' .J:: C,,) ......-- Q) "0 ;g .~ Q) "0 t) ~ .... Q) .... Q) ~fj-5 _ cC 0 - b.O = .... "0 cC .... b.O v.l b.O= =.9 - .... e :;j Q) og. .... Q) Q) = 'eo = l:.Ll a tJ 8'0 ~ v.l ...."0 ='0"-:-' v.l 'C .J:: BQ)o.. cC 0.. e .5 ~ It) s.... - .... !:: = Q) ,J cC _"O.J:: =VJ..... cC .~ .... .J::-Q) v.l:~ ~ .... ..... Q) o C,,) .... _ cC b.O C,,) -.- e8~ d = = o cC.~ C,,) -e ::- Q) :;j.J:: .=.....b.O ~:6:E N b.O = .- "0 cC .... b.O v.l b.O= = .9 - .... e :;j Q) og. r-- ...... .... Q) Q) = 'eo = l:.Ll a tJ rIl ~ - Eo-< ..... ...::l - Eo- ;:J ~ Z < rIl ~ U ~ ~ rIl U ::3 ~ ;:J ~ "O"'g-5ca ~ :a ':i ..9 - = = cC "' =' .J:: ~ "0 8 Q) ~ ~ =.0"0 Q) .... _ 0 v.l ca 8 B ~ cC v.l cC ~ as - cC ..... v.l =~.5 ~ o ca -.= '0 t) v.l g "0 O=' .... "0 .~ ~Q)- "0 = v.l v.l ~ 0 0 Q) = ~ 0 ~::O.9 .J:: b.O:.a ~ ~ c:= -- --- _ 'C "0 'i5. :;j "-::I.a=o..~ <:l.. ..... cC cC .... ~ ...... o o o M 00 o ...... --- ~ ...... - ....-- .-..:.;. - EXHIBIT 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS FINDINGS AND FACTS IN SUPPORT OF FINDINGS ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMP ACT REPORT FOR THE COLLIER AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FINAL EIR SCH #90020171 AS ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON NOVEMBER 7.1990 - AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON NOVEMBER 27. 1990 1.0 POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WHICH ARE NOT SIGNIFICANT OR WHICH CAN BE MITIGATED TO A LEVEL OF INSIGNIFICANT. 1.1 Land Use and Relevant Planning 1.2 Earth Resources 1.3 Hydrology 1.4 Biological Resources 1.5 Cultural Resources 1.6 Aesthetics 1. 7 Traffic and Circulation 1.8 Noise 1.9 Air Quality 1.10 Public Safety 1.11 Growth Inducing Impacts 1.12 Cumulative Impacts 2.0 FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES - 2.1 No-Development alternative 2.2 No-Project Alternative 2.3 Modified Northeasterly Alignment 2.4 Improvements of Baker Street 3.0 FINDINGS REGARDING MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM 3.1 Requirement of Mitigation Monitoring Program JBl/l0830001.TC --~ - FINDINGS AND FACfS IN SUPPORT OF FINDINGS ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REGARDING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACf REPORT FOR THE COLLIER ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECf The State Guidelines ("Guidelines") promulgated pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") provide as follows (Guidelines Section 15091): (a) No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been completed which identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project unless the public agency makes on or more written findings for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. The possible findings are: - (1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the final EIR. (This finding shall be referred to as "finding (1).") (2) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. (This finding shall be referred to as "finding (2).") (3) Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. - (This finding shall be referred to as "finding (3).") The environmental impact report ("EIR") for the Collier Avenue Improvement Project proposed by the City of Lake Elsinore identifies significant effects on the environment which may occur as JB 1/1083000 l.TC 1 ---~ a result of the Project. Section 1 of these findings and facts in support of findings sets forth potential environmental effects of the Project which are not significant because of the design of the project or which can feasibly be mitigated to a level of insignificance. Section 2 provides findings regarding alternatives discussed in the EIR. Section 3 contains findings regarding the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. The findings set forth in each section are supported by facts established in the administrative record of the Project. 1.0 POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WHICH ARE NOT SIGNIFICANT OR WHICH CAN BE MITIGATED TO A LEVEL OF INSIGNIFICANCE - The City has determined the following effects will not be significant, for the reasons stated below. 1.1 LAND USE AND RELEVANT PLANING 1.1.1 Potential Effect: Implementation of the project would widen the existing right-of-way from 60 feet to 100 feet. Implementation of the project would not significantly affect any existing or surrounding land uses. The project is either consistent with, or will amend, the relevant plans that regulate its implementation. Findings: The City hereby makes finding (1). Facts in Support of Findings: The following measures will mitigate the identified impact to a level of insignificance. a. During final design, the City shall coordinate with the appropriate agencies on the relocation of any utility poles with the project area. b. Prior to approval of final design, the City shall coordinate with adjacent property owners on the acquisition of easements and right-of-way. c. Construction drawings for the project shall reflect driveway access for all existing land uses along Collier Avenue. JB1!10830001.TC 2 --- ---- - d. The existing structure with the proposed right-of-way shall be removed prior to grading operations. An agreement between the City and the owner shall be made regarding the removal, prior to the issuance of grading permits. e. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the City shall comply with the regulations of ACOE and CDFG concerning the removal of any wetland areas. f. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the City shall coordinate with FEMA on the amendment of the 100-year floodplain map with the project area. 1.2 EARTH RESOURCES 1.2.1 Potential Effects: Development of the Project will require grading and fill activities, and will disturb local soils. The majority of the proposed alignment of Collier Avenue rests in an area of very slight to a moderate potential for liquefaction. There will be a greater potential for underlying soils to be exposed to wind and water erosion; however, erosion will occur only during project construction. - Findings: The City hereby makes finding (1). Facts in Support of Findings: The following measures will mitigate the identified impact to a level of insignificance. a. Fill slopes shall be designed at a maximum of 2:1 up to 25 feet in height. Fill slopes shall be compacted to minimum standards to the outer slope face. Over filling, compacting, and trimming to grade shall be employed for slope construction. b. All grading shall be performed in accordance with the general earthwork and grading specifications provided in the geotechnical investigation prepared by Leighton and Associates, April 9, 1990. c. During grading operations the proposed alignment area shall be cleared of all vegetation, trees and debris. Superficial trash and debris shall be hauled offsite. This shall include an area extending 5 feet beyond site grading - d. Except for the ramp at the west end ascending to Nichols Road and saturated areas of marsh land, all artificial fill shall be removed to the original ground surface. The exposed surface shall then be scarified, picked clean of organic matter, moisture conditioned to a minimum depth of 12 inches, and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. Such criteria shall be reflected on grading plans. JBl/10830001.TC 3 ......---- e. Roadway base within wet marsh areas or other areas within standing water shall be treated, and recommended treatment of base for wet marsh areas shall be presented in accordance with the geotechnical investigation prepared by Leighton and Associates, April 9, 1990. f. All fill shall be placed in 6-8 inch loose lifts and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. Fill soils shall be evaluated and determined suitable from a soil engineering standpoint prior to importing and placement as compacted fill. g. Prior to placing fill on the existing slope of the road embankment ascending to Nichols Road, suitable benches should be cut into the slope faces as the improvement road fill is brought up to grade. Such criteria shall be reflected on grading plans. - h. Prior to issuance of grading permits, a drainage plan shall be approved by the City. Positive drainage shall be directed and maintained away from the road surface and slopes, toward approved drainage devices. Sheet flow over slopes shall not be allowed. Graded slopes shall be planted with approved cover and maintained to minimize erosion and surficial stability problems. 1. Pavement sections shall be based in accordance with City Standards. Final design plans shall reflect such criteria j. Trenches greater than 5 feet in depth shall be shoved or sloped at 3/4:1 in accordance with California OSHA requirements. k. All trench backfill shall be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. Such criteria shall be reflected on grading plans. 1. Prior to issuance of grading permits, an erosion control plan shall be approved by the City. The erosion control plan shall incorporate provisions for hydroseeding of cut slopes. m. A geologist/soil engineer shall observe and/or test the following stages of construction. - 1. During site clearance and preparation of all graded areas. 2. During the drainage of marsh, wetland areas, and other areas with standing water, or otherwise during placement of gravel base on marsh, wetland areas, and other areas with standing water. 3. During all fill placement 4. During all trench backfill and subgrade compaction prior to paving. 5. When any unusual conditions are encountered. JB 1/1 0830001. TC 4 ---~ - 1.3 HYDROLOGY 1.3.1 Potential Effect: Development of the project would direct drainage flows into Temescal Wash. Implementation of grading plans will alter FEMA maps for the 100 year flood plain. Findings: The City hereby makes finding (1). Facts in Support of Findings: The following measure will mitigate the identified impact to a level of insignificance. a. Prior to issuance of grading permits, grading plans shall be prepared that indicate that finished roadway elevations are raise at least 1 foot above the flood level elevation established by FEMA Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a hydrological analysis of the planned grading and its effects on the 100-year floodplain boundaries designated by FEMA shall be reviewed by FEMA and the City of Lake Elsinore. An amendment to the FEMA floodplain map for the project area shall be initiated by the City if needed. - b. c. Prior to issuance of grading permits an onsite stormwater collection system shall be designed in accordance with the standards and requirements established by the City of Lake Elsinore and the Riverside County hydrology manual. The system shall be adequately sized to control both the stormwater generated onsite plus the 100-year storm flows from the properties and storm drainage systems north of Collier Avenue. d. To prevent erosion by peak flows in Temescal Wash, all exposed fill slope should be stabilized by landscaping and, if necessary, by rip rap or other types of protection. The drainage system outlets to Temescal Wash shall provide energy dissipation to minimize erosion of the fill slope. 1.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 1.4.1 Potential Effect: Implementation of the project results in the conversion of approximately 16 acres of natural communities and would result in the loss of most of the site's fauna. The project would result in the loss of 8.9 acres of wetland area. However, mitigation is being provided to reduce this impact to a level that is less than significant. Additionally, development of the site could have direct and indirect impacts to plant and animal communities. - JBl/l0830001.TC 5 .......-~ Findings: The City hereby makes finding (1). Facts in support of Findings: The following measures will mitigate the identified impact to a level of insignificance. a. The removal, relocation, and creation of any and all wetland areas off the site shall be in accordance with the regulations of the ACOE, USFWS, and CDFG, as appropriate. Such compliance is required prior to issuance of grading permits. b. The removal of 8.9 acres of wetlands that fall within the jurisdiction of the ACOE and CDFG will require mitigation in the form of replacement of lost wetland habitat with habitat of equal or greater value. In anticipation of requests for mitigation, the project sponsor is presently developing a mitigation plan, in consultation with the ACOE and CDFG, that will create wetland habitat offsite. - This mitigation plan will be submitted to the CDFG and ACOE for approval, concurrent with the applications for Section 1601 and Section 404 permits. This plan shall include a detailed mitigation monitoring plan designed to ensure the success of the creation/relocation measure. This plan, upon approval, shall mitigate impacts on wetlands to a level below significant. c. Prior to the onset of grading activities, all areas of southern willow scrub and cismontane alkali marsh occurring adjacent to the site shall be protected with temporary fencing, such as plastic snow fencing. Plastic snow fencing, available in bright orange, is recommended for its high visibility and ease of installation. To prevent impacts resulting from sedimentation in the onsite preserved southern willow scrub and offsite wetland habitats, sedimentation fencing shall also be used in these areas during site preparation and construction. d. No construction access, parking, or storage of equipment shall be permitted within the fenced wetland areas. Construction equipment and vehicles shall be parked on Collier Avenue during site preparation, within the upland habitat (non-native grassland) or graded upland areas. Such criteria shall be reflected as a condition of approval for grading permits. e. To reduce erosion of graded slopes and the subsequent sedimentation in onsite and offsite wetland areas, an erosion control plan shall be formulated by the applicant prior to the issuance of grading permits. This plan shall include a discussion of measures for dust control and mitigation of erosion caused by wind and water. It shall also provide for effective planting, irrigation, and seed germination, or the installation of riprap or other types of slope protection, in areas that would otherwise remain exposed, prior to the rainy season. The plan shall detail erosion control techniques to be utilized during construction, including the placement of sandbags and the installation of sediment traps. JB1/10830001.TC 6 ....-- .-.=. - f. To reduce impacts on adjacent offsite habitat during site preparation, grading and clearing limits shall be staked by the City or its assigns prior to issuance of the rough grading permit. The limits of grading and clearing shall be staked at 50-foot intervals with suitable indicators such as white PVC (polyvinylchloride) pipe with steel bases. Construction equipment shall not be operated off site without prior approval of the adjacent landowners, and a restoration program shall be incorporated to restore any disturbed offsite areas. g. To reduce impacts on wildlife in adjacent habitats and avoid a potential violation of the federal Migratory Bird Act, all rough grading activities shall be restricted to the months when annual spring breeding/nesting does not occur, which is July through February. If any raptor nests are found in trees to be removed from the site, removal shall occur after the nest has been abandoned by the nesting pair and offspring, as confirmed and supervised by a qualified biologist. h. Coordination with County and City agencies, departments, and private contractors responsible for the establishment of infrastructure facilities shall be developed during the planning process to ensure that the placement of water drains, pumping stations, sewer lines, utility lines, and other facilities do not occur within areas supporting designated mitigation for the loss of wetland habitat for the project in adjacent areas. - 1. Should the implementation of site preparation activities, such as grading and habitat removal, be delayed until the 1991 (or later) spring season (April through June), the southern willow scrub will be re-examined for the least Bell's vireo. Should this species be located on the site, consultation with the USFWS will be necessary and a Section toea) permit may be required prior to any disturbance of this species or its habitat on the site. J. To limit human disturbance of onsite and adjacent offsite wetlands after project completion, entry deterrent measures shall be established along the boundaries of these wetlands. These measures may include the construction of a chainlink fence; the use of barrier vegetation, such as cacti, briars, or poison oak; or the placement of large boulders along the outer edges of the onsite wetlands and the northern edge of the adjacent offsite wetland to deter public intrusion and trash dumping. Such measures shall be installed prior to issuance of grading permits. k. Landscaping adjacent to natural areas off site and the retained southern willow scrub onsite shall emphasize the use of native and drought-tolerant plant species. Such species shall be reflected on project landscape plans. The use of species known to be weedy invasives, such as German ivy (Senecio milkanioides), periwinkle (Vinca major), or iceplant (Carpohrotus spp.), shall be prohibited. - JB1I10830001.TC 7 --- -----: - 1. In areas where night lighting may have adverse impacts on sensitive wildlife habitat, such as adjacent to offsite natural habitat, one or more of the following alternatives shall be utilized, if feasible, recognizing the constraints of roadway lighting requirements: (1) low-intensity street lamps, (2) low- elevation light poles, or (3) shielding of internal silvering of the globes or external opaque reflectors. 1.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES 1.5.1 Potential Effect: Project grading could uncover additional cultural resources or expose plant or animal fossils. - Findings: The City hereby makes finding (1). Facts in Support of Findings: The following measures will mitigate the identified impact to a level of insignificance. a. If cultural resources are uncovered during grading operations, grading operations uncovering these resources shall cease and a qualified archaeologist shall be notified for an onsite inspection b. Any recovered cultural resources shall be described in a professional report and recorded with the University of California, Riverside. c. A qualified paleontologist shall monitor rough grading activities that involve Pleistocene terrace materials and older sedimentary units. d. If paleontological resources are uncovered during grading operations, those grading operations shall cease for the inspection, evaluation, and salvage of resources. - e. All fossils collected shall be donated to a public institution with education/research interest in the material and a retrievable storage system. 1.6 AESTHETICS 1.6.1 Potential Effect: The project site provides minimal aesthetic value. Grading operations would alter the onsite topography. Views of the site from within and outside the site would be minimally affected. JB 1/1 0830001. TC 8 ---~ - Findings: The City hereby makes findings (1). Facts in Support of Finding: The following measures will result in a substantial reduction of the aesthetic impacts of the identified significant effect. a. Permanent irrigation shall be provided in all landscaped areas within the roadway's right-of-way. b. The street lighting shall be directed inward toward the site to minimize potential aesthetic impacts and ambient light that could affect Palomar Observatory. Such lighting techniques shall be incorporated into final design plans for the project. 1.7 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION - 1.7.1 Potential Effect: Implementation of the proposed project would improve the existing substandard condition of Collier Avenue. Traffic volumes will substantially increase within the project area due to adjacent development. When combined with adjacent development, approximately 7,500 daily vehicle trips will occur in the project area. Findings: The City hereby makes finding (1). Facts in Support of Findings: The following measures will mitigate the identified impact to a level of insignificance. a. Final design plans shall restrict parking along Collier Avenue through the use of signage and/or painted red curbs. b. Final design plans shall reflect a minimum of 600 feet of spacing between access driveways for future developments along Collier Avenue. c. Final design plans shall limit the height of landscaping and signage within the vicinity of access driveways to ensure good visibility. - JB 1/1 083000 LTC 9 .....-- ----:.;:.. -- 1.8 NOISE 1.8.1 Potential Effect: Traffic generated by the project will result in increased noise levels along onsite and offsite roadways. Construction-related noise impacts would have a short-term impact on ambient noise levels. Findings: The City hereby makes finding (1). Facts in Support of Findings: The following measure will mitigate the identified impact to a level of insignificance. - a. Construction operations adjacent to existing residential uses shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or as otherwise established by City ordinances. 1.9 AIR QUALITY 1.9.1 Potential Effect: Development of the project would result in short-term increases in exhaust emissions from construction equipment and fugitive dust generated as a result of soil movement. Findings: The City hereby makes finding (1). Facts in Support of Findings: The following measures will mitigate the identified impact to a level of insignificance. -- a. Effective fugitive dust control shall be achieved through regular watering or other dust control measures. b. The contractor shall terminate surface disturbance activities during periods of high winds (greater than 15 mph). JBlI10830001.TC 10 ........-~ - 1.10 PUBLIC SAFETY 1.10.1 Potential Effect: Contamination may be present in the vacated Elsinore Ecology Center, which would pose a potential significant health impact to construction workers if encountered during construction activities. Findings: The City hereby makes finding (1). Facts in Support of Findings: The following measure will mitigate the identified impact to a level of insignificance. a. All hazardous wastes encountered. during construction , shall be handled and disposed of in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations. - 1.11 GROWfH INDUCING IMPACTS 1.11.1 Potential Effect: The Project will not significantly foster either economic or population growth in the surrounding area. Findings: The City hereby makes finding (1) Facts in Support of Findings: a. Development of the Collier Avenue Improvement Project would provide for the extension of infrastructure into an undeveloped area, which would reduce development constraints for nearby areas and could serve to induce other landowners in the vicinity to convert their property to urban use. b. Construction of the Collier Avenue Improvement Project would accommodate increased trip generation due to new projects within the area. - JB l/1 083000 LTC 11 .--~ - 1.12 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS 1.12.1 Potential Effect: Other development projects approved with the project area, could have adverse cumulative impacts on Land Use and Planning, Hydrology and Drainage, Biological Resources, Aesthetics, Noise, Air Quality and Public Safety. Findings: The City hereby makes findings (1) and (2). Facts in Support of Findings: The following measures will mitigate the identified impact to a level of insignificance. - a. The Facts in Support of Findings In Sections 1.1 to 1.10 are hereby incorporated by reference. 2.0 FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES 2.1 NO-DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE 2.1.1 Description of Alternative: The EIR describes the no-development alternative as a continuation of existing conditions on the Project site. Comparison of the Effects of the Alternative to the Effects of the Proposed Project: The City hereby finds that the no-development alternative is environmentally superior to the Project because it would eliminate those effects of the Project identified in Section 1. However, benefits of the proposed project would also not occur. Effectiveness in Meeting Project Objectives: The no-development alternative would no facilitate the construction of the needed transportation facility; improvements to Collier Avenue would not occur; therefore, the road would remain in a substandard condition with broken pavement, minimal line of sight, and inadequate drainage. In addition the level of future traffic volumes and project air quality would both decrease. Findings: The no-development alternative is not feasible. JBl/I0830001.TC 12 .....--~ - Facts in Support of Findings: The no-development alternative is infeasible because it does not meet the project objective of providing improved circulation in the project area. 2.2 NO-PROJECT ALTERNATIVE 2.2.1 Description of Alternative: Collier Avenue would be improved to current General Plan designation of a modified local arterial. The roadway would consist of a 68-foot right- of-way. Comparison of the Effects of the Alternative to the Effects of the Proposed Project: The no-project alternative does not provide any significant environmental advantages over the proposed project; therefore, it is not considered to be environmentally superior compared to the proposed project. - Effectiveness in Meeting Project Objectives: The no-project alternative could potentially have similar effectiveness as the proposed project in meeting project objectives. However, traffic impacts associated with the no-project alternative could potentially be greater. The projected traffic volumes for he project area indicate that a modified local arterial would not be adequate to serve future traffic needs. As a result, the project could have significant traffic constraints. Findings: The no-project alternative is not feasible. Facts in Support of Findings: The no-project alternative is infeasible because it is anticipated to have environmental impacts similar to those of the proposed Project. Because there are no clear environmental benefits associated with the alternative, the City's cost for preparation of new studies and implementation plans are not cost efficient. - 2.3 MODIFIED NORTHEASTERLY ALIGNMENT 2.3.1 Description of Alternative: Development of the northeasterly alignment, would improve Collier Avenue to a major arterial with 100 feet of right-of-way. However, its alignment would be situated in more of a northeasterly alignment. JB 1/1 0830001. TC 13 ......- ---= Comparison of the Effects of the Alternative to the Effects of the Proposed Project: The modified northeasterly alignment does not provide any significant environmental advantages and is not considered to be environmentally superior to the proposed project. Effectiveness in Meeting Project Objectives: The northeasterly alignment could potentially have similar effectiveness as the proposed project in meeting project objectives; however land use impacts could be potentially greater. The required right-of-way for the project would require removal of an existing industrial building potentially requiring the removal of an existing single-family dwelling. Findings: The northeasterly alignment alternative is not feasible. Facts in Support of Findings: The northeasterly alignment alternative is infeasible because it is anticipated to have environmental impacts similar to those of the proposed Project. Because there are no clear environmental benefits associate with the alternative, the City's costs for preparation of new studies and implementation plans are not cost efficient. 2.4 IMPROVEMENTS OF BAKER STREET 2.4.1 Description of Alternative: Baker Street is located 114 mile south of the project area and would be improved to a major arterial between Nichols Road and Riverside Drive. The roadway is currently a narrow dirt road serving a few rural residential uses in its project area. Comparison of the Effects of the Alternative to the Effects of the Proposed Project: The Baker street alternative does not provide any significant environmental advantages compared to the proposed project. Therefore, it is not considered to be environmentally superior. Effectiveness in Meeting Project Objectives: The Baker Street alternative could potentially have similar effectiveness as the proposed project in meeting project objectives; however, environmental impacts associated with the improvement of Baker Street are anticipated to be greater compared to those of the proposed project due to the potential land use, earth resources and biological impacts. JB1/10830001.TC 14 .....- ~ ....., Findings: The Baker Street alternative is not feasible. Facts in Support of Findings: The Baker Street alternative is infeasible because it is anticipated to have environmental impacts greater than those of the proposed Project. Because there are no clear environmental benefit associated with the alternative, the City's costs for preparation of new studies and implementation plans are not cost efficient. 3.0 FINDINGS REGARDING MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM 3.1 REQUIREMENT OF MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code requires that when a public agency is making the findings required by Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code, the Agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes to the Project which it has adopted or made a condition of Project approval, in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The City hereby finds that the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Collier Avenue Improvement Project meets the requirements of Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code. - - JBl/10830001.TC 15 ---~ FIN A L Environmental Impact Report Response to Comments SCH #90020171 COLLIER AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - - CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE OCTOBER 1 9 9 0 tnI1 Michael Brandman Associates ....--~ .... FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO COMMENTS TO THE DRAFf ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE COLLIER AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (SCH 90020171) - Prepared for: City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92330 Contact: Dave Gunderman (714) 674-3124 Prepared by: Michael Brandman Associates Carnegie Centre 2530 Red Hill Avenue Santa Ana, California 92705 (714) 250-5555 - Contact: Kathleen Brady-Rebella October 1990 ~~ TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1 PREFACE................................................... 1 2 LIST OF COMMENTORS ....................................... 2 3 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES .................................. 3 JBl/I0830001.RC ......-~ ..... SECTION 1 PREFACE The draft environmental impact report for the proposed Collier Avenue Improvement Project was circulated for public review and comment beginning September 1, 1990, and ending October 15, 1990. As required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the final EIR must respond to comments regarding "significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process" (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15132d). Comments submitted on the draft EIR also included questions about EIR findings and methods, position statements for or against the project, and comments about the community issues of broader citywide concern rather than of specific concern for the Collier Avenue Improvement Project. The final EIR provides responses to comments on significant environmental issues, explains the EIR analysis, supports EIR conclusions, or provides new information or corrections, as appropriate. - The second section provides a list of persons/agencies commenting on the EIR, and the third section contains the comment letters received during the public review process, followed by the responses to those letters. - JB1/10830001.RC 1 ---~ SECTION 2 LIST OF COMMENTORS A Riverside County Sheriff Department Lieutenant Caldwell B. County of Riverside, Transportation Department Edwin Studor, Transportation Planning Director C. Riverside Land Conservancy Henry J. Hoherstein, AICP D. Glenn Lukos Associates Derek Canter, Project Manager E. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Frank J. Peairs, Chief of Planning Division F. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Donald A Hemme, Engineering/Planning Manager G. Caltrans Harvey J. Sawyer, Chief Transportation Planning H. Department of Parks and Recreation D. P. Monohan, Superintendent - JB1/10830001.RC 2 SECTION 3 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES This section presents comments from agencies that responded to the draft EIR. Each comment is identified by a letter and number. Each response is also identified by its corresponding letter and number. JB 1/10830001.RC 3 ......-- .--;: ..... - - ...-- ~ , I Y ~..,"" , "". ~"'" H"' r , I -" ... ... ... ... .. .. - RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF b ~ K [: l:: L. a x N rc~ ~ i= ~~ U tJi~ ''U'" :ib cD N ~ [E~ iJ:t{J 0 ~.~ [N] b) U Mtl '). ql~ ~ 1.4 'T(~ \ .+~ , c~. " /::': f/.", I'v..c.:!. &./ A : (J ~ '() "1'0 t.r/ . I " ~c$' ~~G ~ . ~~. fiC) ,. . DATE: 083090 FM: PERRY MURRETTA CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING DEPARTME~T LT. CALDWELL~~ COLLIER A~ IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TO: RE: I I ~ ~"'U ~...u~ cr..w ~ MV ~.. tIIilIP..... ~~4iI.." ~ ~ WIlil;. ~~.QIt;iI #<i e~ ~ ~~. 8;(; ~.~ ~~ ~~~ ~~;;i'~ ~ I have received the DEIR for the above referenced road Jrojec~. I specifically looked at triG plan€; impact on 'law enfor~ement and A-1 traffic circulation. with the inclusiorl of thel traffic si~~nals mentioned in section 5, I would have not any negative :bmments on the project. I COLLIER AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DRAFf ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Agency: Riverside County Sheriff Department 08/30/90 A-1 This comment is noted. JBlI10830001.RC 4 ......- ---.-.;: ..... - - ---~ ""I,," I 1.1 I . I I V- "-::IV I O. 'OI~IVI I r I~' 0 OI;I.J::I V 0'" III, 'OU 0000." 0 COUNT'~ OF RIV1ER~~:;IDE , TRANSPORTATION' DEPART~IIENT F~A:-;KL1:-;E. SHERKOW CITY OF lA~:E ELSIN()RE ' .,' ,,/?I,fW"f cf, Tn".pcn~llc.:' . ~ RECE-'\fEO cou. ,m AD\H",bTR!\11\ E \';!;:.,UR : MAIL1NG ADDfU:SS: September:LC1 1990 po. B,)~ lO~~ SEP 2 0 1990 ' \'erst:!f., CahfClfm. 92502 lilol) l73.()1i~0 fAX (i'14) 173,6721 PLANNING OEPl: Mr. Perry Murretta City of Lake Elsinore pl,:mning Department 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92330 RE I Draft Ellvl:ronment,! Report Collil9 ImproV'eme::l.t~ Project Impact J~venue Dear Mr. Murrettaa The County of Riversidel Transportation Depl:lJ::t.ment h!i reviewed the above referenced. d.ocumer..t. Based on it tJ:a.ffic recommendations, we have! no objections t':J 1:1:.e approtal e)f the DEIR. However, as the roc!.d will carry a s'u;::lIlt.antial voluIT.e of traffic, much of which will be turI1.i:11C;r into ommEu'cial developments, it may be aclvisabl.e to reloca:tli:l t.he bi~ lanels on an adjacent, less travellEld strelet, such. as Ba':ICElr StreB1.... Thank you for the opportunity to review t.h'l~ tIEIR. ie t:~elffic analysis will assist us ln planning fc,r nEla::'bl' areas remi9.,tning under County jurisdiction. If you have any questions, plE!ase cont.ract~ :?,a'l:ll wrigllj't, plcmner II, ~t (714) 275-6773. . B-1 I ' S.tncerely, . ~\ I. ~ -2::;lj~~~~~_1 Edwin Studor l TJ:ansport!LtioIl. :I?lnnning 9irec.te>r ESaMDaPW: jw I I COD~TY ADMIN1STR..."TIVE CE..";TER · 4060 LE.MO~ STREET · RIVU.smF.. C:A!..1l'OR~l.-\ t25(\\ I .......-~! I COLLIER AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DRAFf ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Agency: Riverside Land Conservancy 09/11/90 C-l Both areas 1 and 2 are not found within the project area. Implementation of the proposed project would result in the replacement of 8.9 acres of lost wetland habitat of equal or greater value. In anticipation of requests for mitigation, the project sponsor is presently developing a mitigation plan, in consultation with the Army Corps. of Engineers and the California Department of Fish and GAme, that will create wetland habitat offsite. ..--- ~ "".,. I ., I . , I \II .,. "'..., , "'... ",,,,1.1 . 5885 Brocktorl Avenue I. Riverside, Calif:~.::ia 92306 I' 714-78B~0670 ---.- 00 ~4.. I1ser1,Ja.~ September 11, 1990 lOllY OF LAKE ELSINORE R:ECEIVEo 5 EP t Jt f99{I P~~~NING DEPt - Mr. perry Murretta city of Lake Elsinore Planning Departmf!nt 130 south Main street Lake Elsinore, CA 92330 Re: Collier Avenue Imprc:)vement Project Dear Mr. Murretta: nilJ.!.!.I!i!la LII'. OOn[]QrUI11C11T hili Nn rnmmf'nt rfHlnnUnlji ~ilui ~.i~:.Y. EIR covering the above :melntionE~d project. However, from a long te:t~m perspective c:ons:lcler,~t1on :ahould be given to the long term protec"tion and. mal:U:I~rement CI~ OnE! or both of the two areas dedineat,ed on t~he i!lt~1:.ached. ,wi thClut further field inve&tig~.t:ton it. 1s not possible to d~termine relative values of the iireas. The dive~rsi.t~~'. indicate~ on the attached would tend to i:ndicate Area i#2 vnmld be the ril::her of the two. C-1 I I Rl verside Land Conservanc:y would enCOUJ:'age further review ~md discussion of this sugg'e~~tion. - sincerely, & \T j)~~-C:vv' ~ He~ Hohenstein, AJ:C:I? 'Y ~ HJH:HM ---~I I .... COLLIER AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Agency: Riverside Land Conservancy 09/11/90 C-1 Both areas 1 and 2 are not found within the project area. Implementation of the proposed project would result in the replacement of 8.9 acres of lost wetland habitat of equal or greater value. In anticipation of requests for mitigation, the project sponsor is presently developing a mitigation plan, in consultation with the Army Corps. of Engineers and the California Department of Fish and GAme, that will create wetland habitat off site. - - JB 1/1 0830001.R C 6 ---~ FROM:GLENN LUKOS ASSOC. TO: 714 250 =0556 OCT 22. 1 '390 2:46PM P.C2 GLENN LUKOS ASSC)C:IATES R'3gulot :;ry Services October 22, 1990 Ms. KHthleen Brady-Rubella Michael Brandman A\;sociates Carnegie Centre 2530 Rcd Hill A...cnm.~ Santa Ana, California 92705 Dear Ms. Brady.RlIbclla: Ancr evaluation o[ design modilications necessary for the imprO"(~l1Ic~nt of Collier Avenllc, in tbl.:. City of Lake Elsinore, California, we have dctcnnincu that impac:ls 10 walcrs of thc United Stutes purslIantto Section 404 of the Clean ~latcr Actllntl Section 1600 of th~~ Cl1lifnrnia fish and GIHne C{)(\c (otal approximately 8.9 ilercs. Earlier j'.lrisdlctiunal dclinef.tiolls of the projet:t site. Icvcabl tllodification of approximately 6.9 llcres of riparian/wethmd habilflt. Two principle rcasons can be cited for the increase in jurisdictional area, 1) cngineeri:lg ~ludics. in conslIllntiun with City starr, revealed that the c1evution of C.ollic:: Avenuc slnuld be increased to remove it from the threat of a lOO.year flood ev<.~nl; this im:rcf\:;e nccessiLnlcd <ldliitional slope encroachment into jllfi~dictillnal arcas, and 2) the Collier Avcnl.le/Ni~ho)s noad inten:hang.c wa\ modified for consistency with future growth :requirements or tlw City of Lakc Elsimm\ uiclating further encroachment into jurisdicdonal areas. 0-1 The lIddilional areas o[ jlll'isdktion::\l impact arc on the 50\:lth siul~ or the pr()p(}~,l~U road. immcdiHtcly adjacent to sitcs previously delincated. A mitigation design is bd ng finalized in (',on~.u1tation wit h the U.S. Fish Clod Wildlife Service ami the Cllliforni:l DC::)Mlmer..t of fish and O<lll1c. For your use, I have included a revised jurisdictional delineation :map dated Octoher 15, 1990. Should you have any qucstions r<.:garding the results of Ol.:tr [jnd.iJ),~s or forthcoming mitigation plan, pie fiSC reel 10 call me. Sincerely, GLENN LUKaS ASSOCIATES, lNC. IflwJ. d. gJ!v Derek A. Kuntar Reglllatory Specialist Enclosure DAK:I083.1c.ltr 23441 South Pointe Drive · 1eleohone: (14) 837-0404 Suite 150 . L:,guna Hills, California 926b3 Facsimile: (71.1) 537.5834 --- ----= -- COLLIER AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DRAFf ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Agency: Glenn Lukos Associates 10/22/90 D-1 Glenn Lukos Associates and Albert Webb Engineering, observed an increase of wetlands from 7.3 to 8.9 that would be affected by the implementation of the proposed project. The removal of the additional 1.6 acres of wetlands fall within the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of Engineers and the California Department of Fish and Game. The detailed mitigation monitoring plan that will be submitted to ACOE and CDFG for approval, concurrent with the application for section 1603 and 404 permits will mitigate impacts on the additional 1.6 acres of wetlands to a level below significance. - - JBl/I0830001.RC 7 --- ----=.:. KENNETH L. EDWARDS CHIEF ENGINEER 1995 MARKET STREET P.O. BOX 1033 TELEPHONE (714) 275-1200 FAX NO. (714) 788-9965 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92502 October 5, 1990 Cr-. J ~. 0.... '.-- / ~..., t _. .J .t. i:' , " l ,." 0,. ,. GCT "'--~iVf:D"~/lvOf1~ PL 1 2 198{) 4IVIVING D~p7: Mr. Perry Murretta City of Lake Elsinore Planning Department 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92230 Dear Mr. Murretta: Re: Collier Avenue Improvement Project - In response to your letter of August 28, 1990 concerning the Collier Avenue improvement project the District has reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) and has the following comments: 1. The District believes a portion of the flows from Arroyo Del Toro (roughly 2000 cfs) impact the easterly portion of the project area. E-1 2. In the future the District will be constructing a storm drain facility to convey the Arroyo Del Toro flows to Temescal Wash. Preliminary design has begun but a final alignment has not yet been established. It is anticipated, however, that the chosen alignment will impact the proposed improvement. E-2 Should you require any additional information regarding this matter, please contact Jon Tack at 714/275-1274. - Very truly yours, q;J~~ FRANK J~P~-- Chief of Planning Division JT:mcy jtl1002a .....--~ - COLLIER AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Agency: Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 10/05/90 E-1 The comment that a portion of the flows from Arroyo Del Toro effect the easterly portion of the project area is noted. The subject flows cross the project site in the vicinity of the Riverside Drive/Collier Avenue intersection. The project does not propose to elevate this segment of the road; therefore, the existing conditions of the site will be preserved. Provisions have been made for the future construction of storm drain facilities. E-2 The City of Lake Elsinore will coordinate with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District to ensure that any conflicts between the design of the roadway and storm drain facility are minimized. Roadway design allows for the future construction of storm drain facilities. - - JB1/10830001.RC 8 .--~ 33751 Mission Trail P.O. Box 3000 Lake Elsinore, CA 92330 (714) 674-3146 Fax: (714) 674-9872 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Perry Murretta City of Lake Elsinore Planning Department 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92330 Clly a,r:: LA R~c~t:~SINOFl~ OCr c: 1 9 1990 PLANNING D ~ F:. ,....,.. -r-L October 17, 1990 Subject: The City's Collier Avenue Improvement Project Draft E.I.A. - The District has reviewed the above document and wishes to make the following comments. Please note the following narrative changes within specific sections of the text as noted (with enclosed photocopy of suggested verbage). Section 3 - Project Description; Subsection 3.2 - Project characteristics (Pages 3-2 and 3-3) F-1 Section 4 - Existing conditions, project impacts,.....; Subsection 4.1.2 - Project Impacts (Page 4-4) F-2 The District's Engineering Staff is now coordinating the improvement plans for the 24" transmission water line. These plans have been submitted by the design engineer and are presently in plan check. Other impacts that were noted in our initial response to your N.O.P. of E.I.R. are being addressed as a part of our coordination of design effort (copy enclosed). Thank you for the opportunity to respond to your draft. ifeiL Donald A. Hem e Engineering/Planning Manager DAH.dmg Enclosures (2) cc: File 9896 BOARD OF DIRECTORS: Div. #3, Kenneth Stoller Div. #1, Charles E. Bryant, Vice-President Div. #4, Gary F. Kelley, Secretary-Treasurer Div. #2, Donald E. Ash Div. #5. Nancy Shafer, President ........- .............;. - COLLIER AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DRAFf ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Agency: Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District 10/17/90 F-1 The comment that the water line proposed within the existing right-of-way of Riverside Drive will be 24 inches rather than the 16 inches identified in the Draft EIR is noted. Additionally, the Draft EIR incorrectly identifies that the existing waterline would be abandoned in place, where in actuality it is proposed to be used for reclaimed water. These correction are hereby incorporated into the Final EIR. F-2 The comment that the existing water main along Collier Avenue would be used as a potable water line rather than abandoned when it is replaced with a larger water line is hereby noted and the correction incorporated into the Final EIR is noted. - - JBl/10830001.RC 9 ~ -:-~ St~~re of California I "'/ ""'" Business, Transportation and Housing Agency ~ .. Memorandum To state Clearinghouse Office of Planning & Research 1400 10th street Sacramento, CA 95814 Dme October 9, 1990 File No.: 08-Riv-74-15. 6 SCH# 90020171 Attention John Vanderbilt '"'I From DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION District 8 Subject: Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Collie~ Drive Realignment We have reviewed the above-referenced document and request consideration of the following comments: /;t -' .., , .__,~ -0""".' "r A section of Collier Avenue and Riverside Avenue is also State Route 74 and should be correctly identified in the study. G-1 Caltrans will be a pe~itting.agency on the road, water and sewer portions of this project that are within State Route 74 right of way. This discretionary action should be added to the others on page 3-4 of the report. Construction of the new water line within the right of way for 1 state Route 74 will be required to be outside the ultimate traveled way. G-2 ,'" , 1 Our records show higher evening peak hour traffic volumes than are used on page 4-61 in this report. Please insure that the correct figures are used. If changes are found to be G-3 appropriate, reevaluation of impacts on affected intersections will be necessary. (See attached page for changes) . Future submittals to Caltrans must address the future configuration of the intersection of Riverside Drive and Collier G-4 Avenue according to the latest version of the Lake Elsinore General Plan. - Parts of the project overlap with Lake Elsinore Assessment District 86-1. This relat~nship should be documeRted in the report. I G-5 This project will require an encroachment permit as work is proposed within the state highway right of way; the Department of Transportation would be the responsible agency and may G-6 require certain measures be provided as a condition_of permit issuance. All matters relating to the Encroachment.Permit process, which includes access, grading, and drainage issues, should be sent to: -~ ,- '. ']' _..~ . :':- '"'":"--'-,.- '. ",..' 1 ......- ....-a , ~ F~ I ~ . . . -.. ~ state Clearinghou;e Attention John Vande~ilt Page 2 October 9, 1990 ......, i 4 Mr. Mike Sim Development Review California Department of Transportation P.O. Box 231 San Bernardino, CA 92402 When avai~ble, we would like to receive the Notice of Determination, Final Environmental Impact Report, Conditions of Approval and the date of any public hearing on this project. Please send this information to: Tom Meyers California Department of Transportation P.O. Box 231 San Bernardino, CA 92402 - .If you have any questions, please contact Tom Meyers at ATSS 670-6908 or (714) 383-6908 (FAX 714-383-4936). 21g~ kt, HARVEY / Chief, Branch J. SAWYER Transportation Planning B TM: ldb bcc: RHelgeson, Plan Coord Unit, DOTP Mike Sim, Development Review ~ ---~ -- . . ~ II I '~.' .La r The existing ICUs and corresponding LOS for intersections in the project area vicinity are shown in Table 4-2. As the table indicates, four of the seven intersections studied (Collier Avenue/ Riverside Drive, Collier Avenue/Central Street, 1-15 southbound (SB) Ramp/Central Street, and 1-15 northbound (NB) Ramp/Central Street) are currently operating at unacceptable levels of service (LOS E or worse). TABLE 4-2 EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACIlY UTILIZATION AND LANE GEOMETRIC~ 1-15 SB Ramps (NS) at Nichols Road (EW) Central Street (EW) Intersection Approach Lanesb North- South- East- West- Evening bound bound bound bound Peak- Hour T R LC T R L T R L T R L ICU LOS ~.o 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 21 A 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 160 e " ~?:>O ~ o 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 21 A o 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 -9t E-Q. 2."::>1 ~ 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 21 A 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 ~ E ~~(J . g iii '. . '- .~ Intersection Collier Avenue (NS) at Nichols Road (EW) Riverside Drive (EW) Central Street (EW) 1-15 NB Ramps (NS) at Nichols Road (EW) Central Street (EW) a Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) .. b When a right turn lane is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. !. ~ . I. c T = Through R = Right L = Left Source: Kunzman Associates, 1990 4-61 JB/10830001.4-7 " --- ~ ..... COLLIER AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Agency: Department of Transportation 10/09/90 G-1 The Final EIR hereby acknowledges that Collier Avenue between Riverside Drive and Central Avenue is known as SR 74. The proposed project is immediately west of the this segment of SR 74. The project extends from Riverside Drive to Nichols Road; therefore, only intersection improvements would effect SR 74. The Final EIR hereby reflects that Caltrans is a responsible agency for the project and will need to be consulted and permits obtained for any work with the Collier AvenuelRiverside Drive intersection. G-2 Design efforts for the water line will be coordinated with Caltrans to ensure that the water line is outside the ultimate traveled right-of-way for the portion of Collier Avenue that is within Caltrans jurisdiction. - G-3 Table 4-2 depicts evening peak hour ICU levels, not the evening peak hour volume of automobiles at their respective intersections. A reevaluation of the traffic volumes and resulting I.C.U. supports the data reflected in Table 4-2. G-4 Your comment is noted. Upon approval of the project the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan would be amended. Any future development or improvement projects would need to reflect the adopted General Plan. G-5 The Lake Elsinore Assessment District 86-1 is for the provision of sewer facilities. The proposed project is solely for the construction of the roadway, and therefore, would not be assessed sewer fees. The adjacent development, which was addressed in separate environmental documentation, would be required to participate in the Lake Elsinore Assessment District 86-1. G-6 This comment is noted. Please refer to the response to comment 1. ....J JBl/10830001.RC 10 '" .....--~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN. GOllflrnor DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Los Lagos District 17801 Lake Perris Drive Perris, California 92370 (714) 657-0676 @ CITY OF LAKE ELSJNORE RECEIVED OCT 1 5 1990 October 10, 1990 PLANNING OEPl: Perry Murretta City of Lake Elsinore Planning Department 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92330 After review of the Environmental Impact Report on the improvement and realignment of Collier Avenue, we have no comment to make at H-1 this time. Please keep us informed of any changes or additions to the project. Sincerely, 0~~~.. D.P. Monahan, Superintendent Lake Elsinore S.R.A. - .......- ....-..:.;: - COLLIER AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DRAFf ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Agency: California Department of Parks and Recreation 10/10/90 H-1 This comment is noted. The City of Lake Elsinore will continue to coordinate with the effected and interested agencies if there are any changes or additions to the project. - JB l/1083 000 l.RC 11 RESOLUTION NO. 90-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, FINDINGS OF FACT AS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERA- TIONS AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE NORTH PEAK SPECIFIC PLAN - The Planning Commission of the city of Lake Elsinore does resolve as follows: section 1. The Planing Commission hereby certifies that there has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore an application by TMC Development to adopt the North Peak Specific Plan, an area which consists of approximately 2,250 acres situated in the foothills of Steele Peak and Wasson Canyon; bounded by Steele Valley to the north, Wasson Canyon to the east, Highway 74 and the ci ty Limits to the south and El Toro Road to the west for a residential and commercial land use development; that due notice of said application has been given and pUblic hearing conducted thereon pursuant to state Planning and Zoning Law and local ordinance; section 2. The Planning commission hereby determines that: - 1. This request is anticipated to result in several significant adverse environmental impacts associated with the development of the site as allowed under the proposed General Plan Revision. These impacts are described in the North Peak Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Specific Plan. For each significant impact, measures are imposed to eliminate or substantially lessen their effects. Some of these significant impacts are unavoidable and a Statement of Overriding Consideration is required. Specific findings on each significant impact are provided. Additionally, a program for monitoring mitigation measures contained in the North Peak Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report is provided. 2. This request will result in significant environmental impacts associated with loss of biological, earth, aesthetic, and open space resources and a substantial contribution to the cumulative impacts of area-wide urban development which may be partially mitigated but are anticipated to remain significant upon development of the site as allowed under the proposed General Plan Revision. These impacts are found to be acceptable due to benefits derived by development under the General Plan, specifically the provision of quality housing and employment opportunities by the City, the anticipated increase in local government revenues generated by project residents and the provision of significant infrastructure improvements, all of which are expected to support local commercial and industrial development efforts and generate measurable benefits to the local economy and fiscal integrity of City government. 3. The approval of the Environmental Impact Report permits development under the North Peak Specific Plan to the highest and best nature within mitigable means to ensure maintenance of the general pUblic health, safety and welfare. 4. The proposed North Peak Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan Revision currently under consideration by the City Council. Section 3. 1. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council certify the North Peak Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, Findings of Fact as to the environmental impacts, Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring Program for the North Peak Specific Plan based upon the findings of the Staff Report and the Conditions of Approval. 2. The Planning Commission hereby further recommends that the City Council take the action recommended above only after the General Plan Revision currently under consideration is in effect. - section 4. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the North Peak Specific Plan. Section 5. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify the adoption of this resolution and forward a copy to the City Clerk for reference and consideration of the City Council. Lake I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a regular meeting thereof conducted on December 5, 1990, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Gilenson, Brinley, Brown, Wilsey and Saathoff NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None - ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTENTION: COMMISSIONERS: None an, Secretary ning Commission - RESOLUTION NO. 90-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CERTAIN TERRITORY DESIGNATED "ANNEXATION NO. 54 -- NORTH PEAK" - The Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore does resolve as follows: Section 1. The Planing Commission hereby certifies that there has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore an application by TMC Development for annexation of an approximately 2,250 acre site currently located in the jurisdiction of the County of Riverside. Annexation No. 54 is situated in the foothills of steele Peak and Wasson Canyon; bounded by Steele Valley to the north, Wasson Canyon to the east, Highway 74 and the city Limits to the south and EI Toro Road to the west (Exhibit I), for a resi- dential and commercial land use development; that due notice of said application has been given and public hearing conducted thereon pursuant to State Planning and Zoning Law and local ordinance; Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that: - 1. This request is anticipated to result in an increased demand for water service and facilities; sewer service and facilities; transportation facilities; police and fire protection; school service and facilities; electricity, natural gas and telephone service and facilities; and parks and recreation service and facilities. A Service provision Plan for Annexation No. 54 has been prepared by the applicant to provide the City of Lake Elsinore, the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission and other governmental agencies with information concerning the provision of services for the North Peak Specific Plan Area into the City of Lake Elsinore (Exhibit II). 2. This request in conjunction with the North Peak Specific Plan is anticipated to result in several significant adverse environmental impacts associated with the development of the site as allowed under the General Plan. These impacts are described in the North Peak Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Specific Plan. For each significant impact, measures are imposed to eliminate or substantially lessen their effect. Some of these significant impacts are unavoidable and a Statement of Over- riding Consideration is required. Specific findings on each significant impact are provided. Additionally, a program for monitoring mitigation measures contained in the North Peak Environmental Impact Report is provided. - Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council commence annexation proceedings of Annexation No. 54-- North Peak based upon the findings of Resolution 90-18 Section 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify the adoption of this resolution and forward a copy to the City Clerk for reference and consideration of the City Council. Lake - I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a regular meeting thereof conducted on December 5, 1990, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Gilenson, Brinley, Brown, Wilsey and Saathoff NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTION: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: None None None n, Secretary 'ng Commission - - RESOLUTION NO. 90-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE NORTH PEAK SPECIFIC PLAN AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS WITH RESPECT THERETO The Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore does ~ resolve as follows: section 1. The Planing Commission hereby certifies that there has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore an application by TMC Development to adopt the North Peak Specific Plan , an area which consists of approximately 2,250 acres situated in the foot- hills of Steele Peak and Wasson Canyon; bounded by Steele Valley to the north, Wasson Canyon to the east, Highway 74 and the City Limits to the south and EI Toro Road to the west for a resi- dential and commercial land use development; that due notice of said application has been given and public hearing conducted thereon pursuant to State Planning and Zoning Law and local ordinance; Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that: ~ 1. This request is anticipated to result in several significant adverse environmental impacts associated with the development of the site as allowed under the proposed General Plan Revision. These impacts are described in the North Peak Environ- mental Impact Report for the proposed Specific Plan. For each significant impact, measures are imposed to eliminate or substantially lessen their effect. Some of these significant impacts are unavoidable and a Statement of Overriding Consideration is required. Specific findings on each significant impact are provided. Additionally, a program for monitoring mitigation measures contained in the North Peak Environmental Impact Report is provided. 2. This request will result in significant environmental impacts associated with loss of biological, earth, aesthetic and open space resources and a substantial contribution to the cumulative impacts are area-wide urban development which may be partially mitigated but are anticipated to remain significant upon development of the site as allowed under the proposed General Plan Revision. These impacts are found to be acceptable due to benefits derived by development under the General Plan, specifically the provision of quality housing and emploYment opportunities by the City, the anticipated increase in local government revenues generated by project residents and the provision of significant infrastructure improvements, all of which are expected to support local commercial and industrial development efforts and generate measurable benefits to the local economy and fiscal integrity of City government. - 3. The approval of the proposed North Peak Specific Plan permits development to the highest and best nature within mitigable means to ensure maintenance of the general public health, safety and welfare. 4. The proposed North Peak Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan Revision currently under consideration by the City Council. Section 3. 1. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the North Peak Specific Plan, based upon the findings of the Staff Report and the Conditions of Approval. 2. The Planning Commission hereby further recommends that the City Council take the action recommended above only after the General Plan Revision currently under consideration is in effect. section 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify the adoption of this resolution and forward a copy to the City Clerk for reference and consideration of the City Council. - Lake I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a regular meeting thereof conducted on December 5, 1990, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Gilenson, Brinley, Brown, Wilsey and Saathoff NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTION: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: None None None - an, Secretary ing Commission -