The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC Reso No 1998-05RESOLUTION NO. 98 - 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CTTY OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGNATING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT FOR CERTAIN STREETS WHEREAS, Prima Facie Speed Limits haue been established on certain designated portions of City streets by City Resolutions 94 - 51 and 96 - 15; and, WHEREAS, travel patterns on certain streets indicate that speed limits are appropriate to be posted or updated at this time; and, WHEREAS, an Engineering and Traffic Survey, as required by the California Vehicle Code, has been completed; and, WHEREAS, Section 1020.010 of Title 10 of the Municipal Code provides for the designation of Prima Facie Speed Limits by resolution of the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council's wishes to add certain established speed limits to those established by Resolutions 94-51 and 96 - 15 by adoption of such a resolution: SPEED LIMITS TO BE ADDED Street Limits Speed Limits FZINT STREET Main Street to Adobe Street 30 NLPH LINCOLN STREET Machado Street to Grand Avenue 35 MPH LINCOLN STREET Grand Avenue to End 35 MPH MiNTHORN STREET Collier Avenue to Chaney Street 35 MPH STRICKLAND AVENUE Chaney Street to Riverside Drive 25 MPH WHEREAS, this Resolution incorporates the above speed limits to be added for Flint Street, Lincoln Street, Minthorn Street and Strickland Avenue speed limits into the speed limits established by Resolutions 94-51 and 96 - 15, as set forth in Exhibit "A," as attached, and; WHEREAS, this Resolution hereby repeals Resolutions 94-51 and 96-15; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, does hereby find, declaze, determine and direct as follows: 1. That the Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits dated December 1997 followed procedures proscribed by the California Vehicle Code and the California Department of Transportation and describes the speed limits to be established by this resolution as set forth RESOLUTION NO. 98 - 5 SPEED LIMITS PAGE TWO in Exhibit `B».. 2. That the Prima Facie Speed Limits sha11 be as set forth in E~ibit "A" attached hereto. 3. That the City Engineer shall direct the placement of signs and markings sufficient to notice of said speed limits. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED TffiS 24th day of March , 1998. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ALONGI, ARINLEY, KELLEY, METZE, PAPE NONE NONE NONE A'I"~`EST: ~ ` ~w Vic;kr Kasati, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO SPI.MT98.RES RESOLUTION NO. 98 - 5 SPEED LIMITS PAGE THREE EXHIBIT A STREET AVENUE SIX BROADWAY STREET LIMITS Franklin Street to Mill Street Lincoln Streetto Grand Avenue CASINO DRIVE Franklin Street to Mill Street Mill Street to Railroad Canyon Road Railroad Canyon Road to Malaga Road CHANEY STREET Collier Avenue to Treleven Avenue Treleven Avenueto Lakeshore Avenue COLLIER AVENiJE Nichols Road to Riverside Avenue Central Avenue to Spring Street CORYDON 5TREET Southwest City Limit to Bryant 5treet Bryant Street to Mission Trail DIAMOND DRIVE/RAiLROAD CYN. RD 300 ft E/O Crrape St to Mission Trail DIAMOND DRIVE Mission Trail to Malaga Road FLINT STREET FRANKLIN STREET Main Streetto Adobe Street Main Street to Conklin Conklin to Rodeo Grounds Rodeo Groundsto Avenue 6 GRAHAM AVENUE GRAND AVENUE Lakeshore Drive to Lindsay Street Lindsay Street to Main Street Lakeshore Driveto Lincoln Street Lincoln Street to Audelo Street Machado Street to Riverside Drive Ortega Highway to East City Limit GLTNNERSON STREET Riverside Drive to Pinnell Street Pinnell Street to LTlmer Street Illmer Street to Lakeshore Drive HEALD AVENUE Chaney Street to Main Street JOY STREET Riverside Drive to Machado Street LAKE STREET Walker Canyon Road to Coal Road (Old Robb Road) Coal Road to Mountain Street Mountain Street to Lakeshore Drive LAKESHORE DRIVE Grand Avenueto Machado Street Machado Street to Riverside Drive Riverside Drive to Chaney Street Chaney Streetto Graham Street Graham Streetto Poe Street Spring Street to Main Street RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMTTS 30 30 40 40 40 40 30 45 45 40 40 35 35 30 25 30 30 30 30 45 45 40 45 30 30 30 25 25 45 45 45 45 40 40 35 25 25 RESOLUTION 98- 5 SPEED LIMTTS PAGE FOUR Main Street to Country Club Blvd 40 Country Club Blvd to Diamond Drive 40 LIlVIITED AVENUE Lakeshore Drive to Main Street 30 LINCOLN STREET Grand Avenue to End 35 Machado Streetto Grand Avenue 35 Machado Street to Riverside Drive 25 MACHADO STREET Lakeshore Drive to Lincoln Street 35 Lincoln Street to Alvarado Street 35 Alvarado Street to Grand Avenue 40 MAIN STREET Camino Del Norte to Heald Avenue 30 Hea1d Avenue to Lakeshore Drive 25 MALAGA STREET Mission Trail to Diamond Drive 35 MINTHORN STREET Collier Avenue to Chaney Street 35 MISSION TRAIL Diamond Drive to Malaga Road 40 Malaga Road to Olive Street 40 Olive Street to Corydon Street 40 MOLTNTAIN STREET Palm View to Lake 5treet 30 ORANGE GROVE WAY Palm View to Lake Street 30 POTTERY STREET Chaney Street to Lewis Street 30 RAILROAD CANYON RD East City Limit to I Mile West 50 1 Mile W/O ECL to 1000 ft E/O Grape St 50 SPRING STREET Collier Avenue to Sumner Avenue 30 Sumner Avenue to Graham Avenue 25 Graham Avenue to Lakeshore Drive 25 STRICKLAND AVENUE Chaney Street to Riverside Drive 25 SUNIlVIERI~I,L DRIVE Villa Milano to Bella Lucia 45 Bella Lucia to Railroad Canyon Road 45 STATE OF CALIFORN7A ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS: CTTY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, VICHI KASAD, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFI' that the foregoing Resolution duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a Regular Meeting of said Council on the 24th day of March, 1998, and that it was so adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ALONGI, BRINLEY, KELLEY, METZE, PAPE NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ~ VICHI KAS , CiTY CLERK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNLA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE) I, VICHI KASAD, CPTY CLERK OF T~ CTTI' OF LAKE ELSINORE, DO HEREBY CER1~Y that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 98-5 of said Council, and that the same has not been amended or repealed. DATE: Apri127, 1998 CLERK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE (SEAL) \ C~Tr EXHIBIT "B" RFFCqkf FEB cF' ~%E"ae fNQ~~ fg/N ~~ ~~9~ NT CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FOR SPEED LIMITS DECEMBER 1997 PREPARED FOR: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 PREPARED BY: HARTZOG & CRABILL, INC. 275 CENTENNIAL WAY, SUITE 208 ~ TUSTIN, CA 92780 (714) 731-9455 CERTIFICATION I, Jerry L. Crabill, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Lake Elsinore was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I certify that I am experienced in performing surveys of this type and duly registered in the State of California as a professional Traffic Engineer. ~~... .~~ ~.,~~f ~ ~I ~' ~ rry L. Crabill Date RTE # 1157 i TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE CERTIFICATION ....................................................................................i TABLE OF CON'I'ENTS ..........................................................:................ii INTRODUCTION .... ................ ..... ....... ............ ........................................1 PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGY OF SPEED ZONE ESTABLISHIvIENT .............1 RADAR SPEED SURVEY OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES ...............................2 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS FACTORS ........................................................3 FIELD REVIEW .....................................................................................3 ACCIDENT HISTORY .............................................................................4 RESLTLTS AND RECONIIvIENDATIONS .......................................................4 SiJMMARY OF RECOD~IIvIENDATIONS ......................................................7 APPENDIX (INCLUDES TI~ FOLLOVJING FOR EACH SURVEYED STREET SEGMENT) a. FIELD REVIEW/RECOMI~~NDATIONS FORM b. CUMULATNE SPEED DISTRIBUTION FORM c. RADAR SPEED SURVEY FIELD SHEET ii CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY FOR SPEED LIlVIITS INTRODUCTION This Engineering and Traffic Survey is intended to serve as the basis for the establishment and enforcement of speed lnnits for selected streets within the City of Lake Elsinore. This survey was authorized by the City and independently conducted by the private consulting firm of Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. Its purpose was to determine prevailing traffic conditions, whether changes have occurred and whether eaiisting speed limits should be revised to be in compliance with State law for enforcement purposes. Engineering and traffic surveys for speed limits are regulazly conducted once every five (5) yeazs in accordance with Section 627 of the Califomia Vehicle Code (CVC) by governing municipalities for the purpose of complying with Section 40802b CVC. This law requires that speed surveys must be performed with the use of radar or other electronic devices at locations where speed limits aze to be enforced with the use of radar. The current survey must be completed within five yeazs of the date of the preceding survey. The lack of a survey would constitute a speed trap as stated below: 40802 A"speed trap" is either of the following: (a} A particulaz section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries mazked, designated or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (b) A particular section of the highway with a prima facie speed limit provided by this code or by local ordinance pursuant to pazagraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established pursuant to Section 22534, 22357, 22358, or 223583, which speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects. In addition, testimony and evidence based upon a speed trap is admissible in a court of Law. PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGY OF SPEED ZONE ESTABLISFiMENT Speed zones are primarily established to protect the general public from the unreasonable behavior of reckless, unreliable, or otherwise dangerous drivers. Speed limits conform to the consensus of the majority of those who drive the highway as to what speed is reasonable and safe, along with the professional review of a Traffic Engineer, and aze not dependent upon one or a few individuals. The statistical factors used to analyze the collected speed survey data aze defined in the following section. Speed zones aze also established to advise of road conditions or hazards which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, a field review of related road/traffic variables is conducted which is considered in combination with the statistical data and accident history of a particulaz roadway segment to determine a safe and reasonable speed lunit. RADAR SPEED SURVEY OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES Radar speed measurements for the subject survey were conducted in October 1997 on 6 street segments in the City of Lake Elsinore. The surveyed segments are listed below: Flint Street Main Street to Adobe Street Lincoln Street Riverside Drive to Machado Street Machado Street to Crrand Avenue Grand Street to End Minthorn Street Collier Avenue to Chaney Street Strickland Avenue Chaney Street to Riverside Drive The specific survey locations on each segment were selected after determining the following criteria: a. Minimuxn stop signs or traffic signal influence; b. Minimum visibility restrictions; c. Uncongested traffic flow away from intersections, major driveways, crosswalks, and unusual turning movements; d. Minimuxn influence from parked vehicles, bumps, dips, curves, or poor roadway conditions. The hours of radar operation were from 8:00 am to 5:00 PM with arterial roadways being restricted to off-peak periods from 9:00 am to 4:30 PM. Speed surveys were conducted on days with fair weather and cleu visibility. The radar units were mounted on the &ont dashboazd of an unmarked vehicle, with the meter reading unit sustained inside the vehicle and the calibration checked periodically using a tunuig fork in accordance with manufacturers recommendations. The operator recorded the radaz speed meter readings for each location on Radaz Speed Survey Field Sheets included in the Appendix Sections of this Report. A representative sampling of at least 100 vehicles were surveyed in sach direction (or a cumulative sample of 200 vehicles for both directions). For those instances where the sampling of 100 vehicles would take an excessive amount of time, sampling was continued until a bell shaped curve was established. 2 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS FACTORS Significant factors used to analyze the collected survey data aze suuunarized below: 1. The critical speed, or 85~' Percentile Speed, is defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This factor is the primary guide in determining what speeds the majority of safe and reasonable drivers aze traveling. The accepted practice is to set the speed limit at or within 5 MPH below the Critical Speed unless other factors require a lower limit. Speed limits set on this basis provide law enforcement officials with a means of controlling reckless or unreasonable drivers who will not conform to what the majority finds safe and reasonable. 2. The 10 MPH Pace is the 10 MPH increment range which contains the lazgest number of recorded vehicles. The pace is a measure of the dispersion of speeds within the sample surveyed. The accepted practice is to keep the speed lunit within the 10 MPH pace after considering the Critical Speed and any factors requiring a speed lower than the Critical Speed. 3. The Median Speed, or 50~' Percentile Speed, represents the mid-point value within the range of recorded speeds for a particulaz roadway location. That is, 50 percent of the vehicles travel faster than, and 50 percent travel slower than the median speed. This value is another measure of the central tendency of the vehicle speed distribution. 4. The 15`h Percentile is that speed at or below which IS percent of the vehicles ue traveling. This value is important in dete+~~n~ng the minunum allowable speed lnnit, given that the vehicles traveling below this speed tend to obstruct the flow of traffic, thereby increasing the accident potential. The numerical values of the above factors are derived from the cumulative speed distribution curves (found in the Appendix Section) which aze calculated for each survey location. This distribution curve represents a method of graphical analysis, which compares the cumulative percentage of vehicles to the speed at which the vehicles are traveling. FIELD REVIEW In addition to the availability of the above statistical data, a significant aspect of speed limit recommendations is based on the field review. Its importance is Yhat existing conditions may warrant a lower speed than is actually mdicated by the application of survey data. Examples of the field data collected for the purposes of analyzing related roadway chazacteristics as they pertain to the determination of appropriate speed lnnits aze listed below: i. Segment length, width, and alignment; 2. Level of pedestrian activity; 3. Traffic flow characteristics; 4. Vertical and/or horizontal curves; 3 5. Driver sight distance constraints; 6. Adjacent residentiaUcommerciaUindustrial etc. zoning; 7. Number of lanes and other channelization/stripping factors; 8. Frequency of intersections, driveways and on-street pazking; 9. Location of stop signs, traffic signals, and other regulatory traffic control devices; 10. Roadway condition, bumps, and dips; 11. Obstruction to pedestrian visibility; 12. Land use and proximity of schools; 13. Any other unusual conditions not readily appazent to the driver. T'he results of the field review of related road/traffic variables are summarized on the Engineering and Traffic Survey forms found in the Appendix of this report. ACCIDENT ffiSTORY The Engineering and Traffic 3urvey forms summarize the available accident information for the subject streets. The accident information includes the total number of accidents within each street segment and of those accidents, the number which are speed-related. This information was obtained from the California Statewide Integrated Traffic Record System (SWITRS) for the City of Lake Elsinore. The Annuai accident rate figures represent the number of speed-related accidents divided by years of accident records. The evaluation of accidents is useful as a check on the accuracy of recommended or existing speed limits. Should this review show a high percentage of accidents associated with excessive speeds, then the consideration based on professional traffic engineering judgment should be directed toward reducing the posted or recommended speed lunit. RESULTS AND RECOMA'~NDATIONS Roadway conditions such as width, number of lanes, traffic control devices, and advance warning signs identifying schools are readily appazent to the driver and should not influence the results of the Engineering and Traffic Survey. The legislature has stipulated via CVC section 22358.5 that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and roadway surface, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning. The recommendations contained in this report are intended to establish pruna facie speed limits. Prima facie limits attempt to advise the motorist, and enforcement, of the reasonable speed for a particular section of roadway for prevailing conditions. In many cases, the recommendations may produce a uniform speed lnnit along the road. To this end, the spee.d limits in adjacent jurisdictions were considered as well as along the various street segments surveyed within the City of Lake Elsinore. The Engineering and Traffic Survey Sheets, presented in the Append'vt, illustrate results of a thorough evaluation of available data and include a recommended speed limit of each of the 6 street segnents surveyed. The radaz speed survey, statistica] data and subsequent speed limit 4 recommendadon aze given in tabulaz form in the Summary of Recommendations. This summary indicates that (a) two of the six street segments are recommended to remain at theu current "posted" limits, and (b) four street segments have no speed limit signs posted and appropriate speed 1'unit recommendations are provided for those cases. Speed limit postings have been suggested for the portions of the following street: Flint Street (Post) Lincoln Street (One section unposted) Minthorn Street (Post) Strickland Avenue (Post) FLINT STREET (Post new speed limit signs) Main Street to Adobe Street This 034 mile length segment provides one lane in each direction. Neighboring land uses aze residential, commercial and a vacant land. Currently a posted speed limit does not exist for this segment. The Engineering and Traffic Survey revealed a critical speed of 34.4 mph and a median speed of 30 mph. The speed data showed that 79 percent of these velricles travel within 27 to 36 mph. It is our opinion that a speed limit of 30 mph should be posted for this street segment. LINCOLN STREET (Post new speed limits signs) Grand Street to End This segment of Lincoln Street provides one lane in each direction. Adjacent land use is primarily residential. On street parking is prohibited on the second and fourth of Tuesday from 8 AM to 2 PM. Currently, a posted speed limit does not exist for this segment. The Engineering and Traffic Survey revealed a critica] speed of 38.2 mph and a median speed of 33.6 mph. It is recommended that a 35 mph limit be posted for the street segment. MINTHORN STREET (Post new speed limit signs) Collier Avenue to Chanev Street Commercial and vacant land occupies ihis street segment. There is no accident history on this segment of the street. Existing speeds for the azea are chazacterized by an 85`~' percentile value of 353 mph, a median speed of 30.5 mph. It is our recommendation that the speed limit for this section should be posted at 35 mph. STRICKLAND AVENUE .(Post new speed limit signs) Chanev Street to Riverside Drive Adjacent land uses aze residential, hillside, and a vacant land. Approximately 600 vehicles travel this roadway daily and no speed-related accidents were recorded. The Engineering and Traffic Survey revealed a critical speed of 24.9 mph, a median speed of 21.4 mph, and a 10-mile per pace range of i 7 to 26 mph accounting for 85 percent of the vehicies. It is recommended that this roadway be posted at 25 mph. 6 ; CITY OF LAKEfLSiNORE OCTOBER 1997 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS EXISTING RECOMMENDED 85th 10MPH PERCENTOF SPEED SPEED PERCENTILE AVERAGE PACE VEHICLES STREETILOCATION LIMITS ~ LIMITS . SPEED SPEED ~ RANGE IN PACE JUSTIPICATION FLINT STREET NSTREET POST . TO ADOBE STREET NP 30 34.4 30 27.96 78.6 BSTH PERCENTILE LJNCOLN STREET RNERSIDE DRIVE TO MACHADO STREET 25 25 41.4 36.6 3740 66.0 NO CHANGE MACHADOSTREET TO GRAND S7REET 35 35 45.0 38.6 35~4 63.3 NO CHANGE GRAND STREET ~ POST TO END NP 35 38.2 33.6 31~4D 76.9 85TH PERCENTILE MINTHORN STREET ' COLLfER AVENUE TO CMANEY STREET NP 35 35.3 30.5 27-36 74.2 86TH PERCENTILE (15 MPH ADVISORY) STRICKLAND AVENUE CHANEYSTREET TO RIVERSI~E DRIVE NP 25 24.9 21.4 17-26 85.3 86TH PERCENTILE (15 MPH ADVISORY} xr: xor ros~o 7 ~ ~ H A ~ W ~ a ~ , CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY ~ FIELD REVIEW FORM STREET: PLINT STREET LOCATION: MAIN STREET AND ADOBE STREET FIELD REVIEW BY: D. LOEUNG CHECKED BY: J. CRABILL DATE: 10J1-97 PACTORS DIRECTION: WESTBOUND DIRECTION: EASTBOUND A. PREVAILING SPEED DATA DATE OF SURVEY 10-37-97 1031-97 LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF LOOKOUT WEST OF LOOKOUT SSfH PERCENTILE 34.4 MPH 34.4 MPH '10 MPH PACE 27-36 MPH 2736 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 78.60% ~ 18.60°k ~POSTED SPEED LIMIT NOT POSTED NOT POSTED 8. ACCIDENT HISTORY NO.OF MONTHS COVERED 38 - SPEED•RELATEDACCIDENTS ~ 0 - TOTAL ACCIDENTS 1 - ANNUALACCIDENTRATE .33ACCIDENTSlYEAR - ACCIDENTSIMIL. VEH. MILES O.OO ACCIDENTSIMVM -. C. TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 500 VEHICLES PER DAY - LANE CONFIGURATION 7 LANE 7 LANE TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP AT MAIN STOP AT MAIN CROSSWALKS NONE NONE PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES NO1N0 NOINO TRUCK TRAFFIC NO NO ~ ~ ONSTREET PARKING NONE OBSERVED NO PARKING ON 1ST AND 3RD MON (8•2PM) OTHER (SPECIFI~ D. ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH Of SEGMENT (MILES) .34 MILES - VERTICAL CURVE STEEP DOWN AND UPHILL STEEP DOWN AND UPHILL HORRONTAL CURVE S-CURVE S-CURVE LATERAL VISIBILITY PAIR PAIR SURFACE CONDITION GOOD - GOOD SIDEWALKSIDRIVEWAYS FARTIAUYES PARTIAUYES STREET LIGHTING YES . YES OTHER (SPECIFY) E. ADJACENT LAND USES COMMERCIAWACANT LOT COMMERCIAWACANT LOTIRESIDENTIAL RECOMMENDED SPEED LiM1T 30 MPH 30 MPH SPEED LIMIT CHANGE? ~ YES . YES L A R E E L S I N O R E R A D A R S P E E D D I S T R I B U T I O N STREET: ------------------ FLINT STREET LOCATION: ---------------- MAIN STREET TO ADOBE STREET DIRECTION: --------------- EAST & WESTBOUND DATE OF SURVEY: ---------- 10-31-97 PERIOD OF SUR~IEY: -------- 12:15 PM - 1:00 PM TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED: - 70 SURVEY CONDUCTED BY: ----- D. LOEL7NG ------°---°---------------- (MPH) FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE ---------------------°------------------ : ** CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE ** -- ------------------------------------0-------25------50------75-----100-- 38 1 1.4 :100.0 : * 38 37 4 5.7 : 98.6 : * 37 36 3 4.3 : 92.9 : u 36 35 4 5.7 : 88.6 : * 35 34 2 2.9 : 82.9 : • 34 33 5 7.1 : 80.0 : * 33 32 6 8.6 : 72.9 : * 32 31 10 14.3 : 64.3 : * 31 30 8 11.4 : 50.0 : n 30 29 9 12.9 : 38.6 : • 29 28 3 4.3 : 25.7 : * 28 27 5 7.1 : 21.4 : ~ 27 26 2 2.9 : 14.3 : * 26 25 1 1.4 : 11.4 : * 25 24 1 1.4 : 10.0 : * 24 23 1 1.4 . 8.6 : * 23 22 2 2.9 . 7.1 :• 22 21 3 4.3 . 4.3 :* 21 ------------------------------------0-------25------50------75-----100 -- DATA REDUCTION: ------°------- 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: ------ ----- 34.4 MPH UPPER LIMIT OF 10 MPH PACE: - ----- 36.0 MPH LOWER LIMIT OF 10 MPH PACE: - ----- 27.0 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: ------------ ----~ 78•6$ (55 VEHICLES) PERCENT OVER PACL: -------°- ----- 7•1$ ( 5 VEHICLES) PERCENT UNDER PAGE: --------- ----- 14.3$ (10 VEHICLES) SOth PERCENTILE (MEDIAN) SPEED: -- 30.0 MPH 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: ------ ----- 26.1 MPH STANDARD DEVIATION: --------- ----- 4.087 FZLE: FLINT MODE SPEED(S): -------------- ----- 31 MPH RECORD: 1 PREPARED BY: HART20G AND CRABILL, INC. 275 CENTENNIAL WAY. SUITE 208 TUSTIN, CA. 92780 PH. 714/731-9455 ~ ~ I I 15P0-Nq.E.O . . - Radar Speed Survey Field Sheet ~~~M~µ~p ~ AGENCri LLlKE ELJ{~•IU~~ gTp~7, F L I t~1 T ST~'~eT LOCATON= M/alnl STI=rE-T A-+JD /-~.DGBt STRieT' TOTAL AVERAOE CFiffiCAL SPEED~ SPEED~ CUMUlA71VE (BOlli D~tECTON9) _ PACE SPEED~ 5 u N l~ I DATE~ 10~3 I/~', WEATiER~ ROADCONDfTION, 9RY 3TARTTME~ ~~^~SP~ OBSERVER~ ~~ LOtU~~j ENDTME~ ~-u~ PM rorw pyEqqp~ CRIi1CAL ~'A~ SPEED~ BPEED~ B~E~' ,~ i CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FIELD REVIEW FORM STREET: LINCOLN~STREET LOCATION: MACHADO STREET AND RIVERSIDE DRIVE FIELD REVIEW BY: D. LOEUNG CHECKED BY: J. CRABILL DATE: 11JA7 FACTORS DIRECTION: WESTBOUND OIRECTION: EASTBOUND A. PREVAILING SPEED DATA ~ DATE OF SURVEY N3-97 11 7-97 LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF VIA VALDEZ EAST OF VIA VALDEZ 85TH PERCENTILE 41.4 MPH 41A MPH 10 MPH PACE 9'1~40 MPH . 51~40 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 88.00°h 88.00% POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH ~ 26 MPH B. ACCIDENT HISTORY N0. OF MONTHS COVERED 36 - SPEED-RELATEDACCIDENTS ~ 3 - TOTAL ACCIDENTS 11 - ANNUAL ACCIDENT R4TE 3.67ACCIDENTSlYEAR -- ACqDENTS/MIL. VEH. MILES 1.17 ACCIDENTSIMVM - C. TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 4600 VEHICLES PER DAY - LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE t LANE TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL AT MACHADO, RIVERSIDE SIGNAL AT MACHADO, RIVERSIDE CROSSWALKS AT MACNADO AT MACHADO PEDESTRIANIBICYCLES YESINO YES1N0 TRUCK 7RAFFIC YES YES ~ - ONSTREET PARKING . PARTIAL PARKING YES OTHER (SPECIFI~ D. ROADWAY FACTORS ~ ~ LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) .52 MILES - VERTICALCURVE NONE NONE HORIZONTALCURVE NONE NONE LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD . GOOD SURFACE CONDITION GOOD GOOD SIDEWALKSIDRIVEWAYS YESIVES YESNES STREETLIGHTING . YES YE5 OTHER (SPECIFY) E. ADJACENT LAND USES RESIDENTIALICOMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMR 25 MPH 26 MPH SPEED LIMIT CHANGE7 NO NO LARE ELSINORE R A D A R S P:E E D STREET: -- LOCATION: DIRECTION: D I S T R I 8 U T 2 O N LINCOLN STREET MUCHADO STREET AND RI~7ERSIDE DRIVE EAST & WESTBOUND DATE OF SURVEY: ---------- 10-31-97 PERIOD OF SURVEY: -------- 8:00-9:30 AM TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED: - 197 SURVEY CONDUCTED BY: ------ D. I,OEUNG ------ (MPH) ----------- FREQUENCY ------°---- PERCENTAGE ------- : ------------------------------------ ** CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE ** ------ ----------- --°-°=-----------0-------25------50------75-----100-- 50 1 0.5 :100.0 : * 50 49 1 0.5 : 99.5 : • 49 48 3 1.5 : 99.0 : • 48 47 1 0.5 : 97.5 : * 47 46 3 1.5 : 97.0 : + 46 45 6 3.0 : 95.4 : * 45 44 4 2.0 : 92.4 : * 44 43 5 2.5 : 90.4 : * 43 42 9 4.6 : 87.8 : * 42 41 8 4.1 : 83.2 : * 41 40 12 6.1 : 79.2 : u 40 39 14 7.1 : 73.1 : * 39 38 11 5.6 : 66.0 : * 38 37 14 7.1 : 60.4 : * 37 36 14 7.1 : 53.3 : n 36 35 5 2.5 : 46.2 : * 35 34 20 10.2 : 43.7 : • 34 33 15 7.6 : 33.5 : * 33 32 10 5.1 : 25.9 : * 32 31 15 7.6 : 20.8 : ~ 31 30 3 1.5 : 13.2 : * 30 29 10 5.1 : 11.7 : * 29 28 3 1.5 . 6.6 :* 28 27 6 3.0 . 5.1 :* 27 26 2 1.0 . 2.0 :* 26 25 I 0.5 . 1.0 :* 25 24 1 0.5 . 0.5 :* 24 ------ -------------------°---------0-------25------50------75-----100-- DATA REDUCTION: 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: --------- -- 41.4 MPH UPPER LIMIT OF 10 MPH PACE: ---- -- 40.0 MPH LOWER LIMIT OF 10 MPH PACE: ---- -- 31.0 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: --------------- - 66.0$ (130 VEHICLES) PERCENT OVER PACk; --------~------ 20.8$ ( 41 VEHICLES) PERCENT UNDER PACE: ------------- 13.2$ ( 26 VEHICLES) 50th PERCENTILE (MEDIAN) SPEED: - - 35.5 MPH 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: ---------- - 30.2 MPH STANDARD DEVIATION: ------------- - 5.343 MODE SPEED(S): ------------------ - 34 MPH FILE: LINCOLN RECORD: 1 AGENCY~ ~ , I / 15PU-HCldrq ~~ Radar Speed Survey Field Sheet ~.~..4,. IIYt FF~ Y4111~.1}I M Irul~~-~w ""~°°~°cft % ~(~S{':~LP.E WEA7HER~ Sl~nItJY DATE~ ~4' 7I` l~ ~~-~ ROAD CONDfTION~ ~~ p 3TART TIME~ D=O0 QM p ~,J NJCN+4Da ~Y ~~J~~~FD~, OBSERVER D L~~I~tJ~ ENDTIME+ ~^3d f~h rora. AVERA6E CRRICAL SPEED~ SPEED~ CUMULATIVE (807H DIREC7ION9) _ . PACE SPEEa AVERAGE CRfTICAL PACE SPEED~ SPEED~ SPEED~ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY ~ FIELDREVIEW FORM STREET: LINCOLN STREET ~ LOCATION: MACHADO AND GRAND STREET FIELO REVIEW BY: D. LOEUNG CHECKED BY: J. CRABILL DATE: '10.11•97 FACTORS DIRECTION: WESTBOUND DIRECTION: EASTBOUND A PREVAILING SPEED DATA ~ ~ DA7E OF SURVEY 10-31-87 1PSL87 IOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF TERRA COTTA WEST OF TERRA COTTA ~ 85!#i PERCENTILE 45.0 MPH 46.0 MPH 70 MPH PACE . 3Sd4 MPH 3544 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 63.30% 63.30°h P0.5TED SPEED LIMIT $5 MPH 35 MPH B. ACCIDENT HISTORY ~ NO.OF MONTHS COVERED 36 - SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 2 - TOTALACCIDENTS q _ ANNUAL ACCIDENT R4TE 1.33 ACCIDENTSlYEAR - ACCIDENTSIMIL. VEH. MILES 0.50 ACCIDENTSIMVM - C. TRAFFIC PACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 4000 VEHICLES PER DAY _ LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES 2 LANES TRAFFIC CONTROLS AT GRAND, MACHADO pT GRAND, MACHADO CROSSWALKS ATGRAND,MACHADO ATGRAND,MACHADO PEDESTRIANlBICYCLES YESIYES YESlYES TRUCK TRAFFIC ~ yE5 YES "' ONSTREET PARKING NO PARKING - NO PARKING OTHER (SPECIFY) DOUBLE YELLOW LINE DOUBLE YELLOW LINE D.ROADWAYfACTORS ~ LENGTH Of SEGMENT (MILES) .91 MILES _ VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHTLY UP AND DOWNHILL SLIGHTLY UPAND DOWNHILL HORIZONTAL CURVE S-CURVE S-CURVE LATERAL VISIBILITY FAIR FAIR SURFACE CONDITION GOOD GOOD SIDEWALKSIDRIVEWAYS YESINO YESINO STREET LIGHTING YES YES OTHER (SPECIFY) E. ADJACENT LAND USES RESIDENTIAL• RESIDENT44L' RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 36 MPH 36 MPH ~ SPEED LIMIT CHANGE? NO NO acrnnn ~ cv o~ o~a~.n rcm.ca 1 S P E E D D I S T R I 8 U T 2 O N STREET: -- LOCATION: DIRECTION: LINCOLN STREET GRAND STREET AND MACHADO STREET EAST & WESTBOUND DATE OF SURVEY: ---------- 10-31-97 PERIOD OF SURVEY: -------- 1:15-2:25 PM TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED: - 215 SURVEY CONDUCTED BY: ----- D. LOEIING ------------------ (MPH) FREQUENCY ----------- PERCENTAGE ---------------------------------- : ** CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE °------- ** ------------------------------------0-------25----°50------75-- °-100-- 54 2 0.9 :100.0 : • 54 53 1 0.5 : 99.1 : * 53 52 2 0.9 : 98.6 : t 52 51 2 0.9 : 97.7 : * 51 50 1 0.5 : 96.7 : * 50 49 3 1.4 : 96.3 : * 49 48 5 2.3 : 94.9 : • 48 47 8 3.7 : 92.6 : * 47 46 8 3.7 : 88.8 : * 46 45 8 3.7 : 85.1 : • 45 44 10 4.7 : 81.4 : u 44 43 12 5.6 : 76.7 : * 43 42 12 5.6 : 71.2 : * 42 41 14 6.5 : 65.6 : * 41 40 17 7.9 : 59.1 : * 40 39 16 7.4 : 51.2 : „ 39 38 16 7.4 : 43.7 : * 38 37 10 4.7 : 36.3 : * 37 36 12 5.6 : 31.6 : * 36 35 17 7.9 : 26.0 : ~ 35 34 9 4.2 : 18.1 : * 34 33 11 5.1 : 14.0 : * 33 32 2 0.9 . 8.8 : • 32 31 2 0.9 . 7.9 :* 31 30 3 1.4 . 7.0 :* 30 29 6 2.8 . 5.6 :* 29 28 3 1.4 . 2.8 :* 28 27 0 0.0 . 1.4 :* 27 26 1 0.5 . 1.4 :* 26 25 1 0.5 . 0.9 :* 25 24 1 0.5 . 0.5 :• 24 ------------------------------------D-------25------.50------75-- ---100-- DATA REDUCTION: --------------- 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: ------ ----- 45.0 MPH UPPER LIMIT OF 10 MPH PACE: - ----- 44.0 MPH LOWER LIMIT OF 10 MPH PACE: - ----- 35.0 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: - ----------- ---- 63.3$ (136 VEHICLES) PERCENT OVER PACE ----------- ---- 18.6% ( 40 VEHICLES) PERCENT UNDER PACE: --------- ---- 18.1~ ( 39 VEHICLES) SOth PERCENTILE (MEDIAN) SPEED: -- 38.8 MPH 15th PERCENTILE 3PEED: ------ ----- 33.3 MPH STANDARD DEVIATION: --------- ----- 5.703 FILE: LINCOLN MODE SPEED(S): --- ----------- ----- 35,40 MPH RECORD: 3 fsio-xc.d.q Radar Speed Survey Field Sheet n~'~ ~, nu AOENCY~ L~K~ .~~~~0~~ 3TflEET l~~ ~Ol. p~~ IOCATION~ T.r 1~1A~6'~ [1R~D {v~v~ M~N' ~1Y~ TOTAL AVERAGE CRRICAL SPEED~ SPEED+ CUAAULATIVE (BO'fH DIREC110N9) _ PACE SPEED WEATHER~ ~Sv/Jt~J`~ DATE~ ~` •~I/R•] 1 r-- pOAD CONDRTION= DRY 9TART T1ME~ 1~~ S PM OBSERVER~ `J ~..bC~'U~~ ENDTIME~ ~'~~~M TOTAL AVERAGE CRfi1CAL PACE SPEED~ ~ SPEED~ 9PEED~ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ~ ~ ENGINEERING AND TRAfFIC SURVEY - PIELD REVIEW FORM STREET: LINCOLN STREET LOCATION: GRAND STREET AND END FIELD REVIEW BY: D. LOEUNG CHECKED BY: J. CRABILL DATE: 10-31•87 PACTORS DIRECTION: WESTBOUND DIRECTION: EAS780UND A. PREVAILING SPEED DATA DATE OF SURVEY 70-31-97 1031-97 LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF BROADWAY WEST OF BROADWAY B6TH PERCENTILE 38.2 MPH 38.2 MPH 70 MPH PACE 31-40 MPH 97~40 MPH PERCENT IN PACE ~6.90°h 76.80°h POSTED SPEED LIMIT NOT POSTED NOT POSTED B. ACCIDENT HISTORY NO.OF MONTHS COVERED 36 - SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 0 - TOTAL ACCIDENTS 0 - ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTSIYEAR - ACCIDENTSIMIL. VEH. MILES 0.00 ACCIDENTSIMVM - C. TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE OAILY TRAFFIC 800 VEHICLES PER DAY - LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE 1 LANE TRAFFIC CONTROLS AT GRAND AT GRAND CROSSWALKS ATGRAND ATGRAND PEDESTRIANIBICYCLES YES/NO YESINO TRUCKTRAFFIC - YES YES ~~ ~ ONSTREET PARKING NO PARKING ON 2ND AND 4TH TUES. (8-2PM) NO PARKING ON 2ND AND 4TH TUES. (8-2PM) OTHER (SPECIFI~ MEDIAN ISLAND MEDIAN ISLAND D. ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) .60 MILES - VERTICAL CURVE SL~GHTLY UP AND DOWNHILL SLIGHTLY UP AND DOWNHILL HORIZONTAL CURVE S~CURVE S~CURVE LATERAL VISIBILITY FAIR FAIR SURFACE CONDITION GOOD . GOOD SIDEWALKSIDRIVEWAYS YESINO PARTIALINO STREET UGHTING ~ YES YES OTHER (SPECIPI~ E. ADJACENT LAND USES RESIDENTIAL' RESIDENTUIL• RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 36 MPH 35 MPH SPEED LIMIT CHANGE? POS7 POS7 RESIDENTULL SEPAR4TED BY BRICK FENCES 1 L A R E E L S 2 N O R E R A D A R S P E E D D I S T R I 8 U T I O N STREET: ------------------ LINCOLN STREET LOCATION: ---------------- GRAND STREET TO END DIRECTION: --------------- EAST & WESTBOUND DATE OF SURVEY: ---------- 10-31-97 PERIOD OF SURVEY: -------- 2:30 PM - 3:30 PM TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED: - 108 SURVEY CONDUCTED BY: ----- D. LOEUNG ----------------------------- (MPH) FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE ---°- : -----------------°---------- ** GUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE -------- ** --------------°------------------- -0-------25------50------75-----100-- 43 2 1.9 :100.0 : + 43 42 3 2.8 : 98.1 : + 42 41 2 1.9 : 95.4 : * 41 40 5 4.6 : 93.5 : u 40 39 5 4.6 : 88.9 : " 39 38 9 8.3 : 84.3 : * 38 37 10 9.3 : 75.9 : R 37 36 6 5.6 : 66.7 : • 36 35 7 6.5 : 61.1 : ~ 35 34 12 11.1 : 54.6 : n 34 33 12 11.1 : 43.5 : ^ 33 32 7 6.5 : 32.4 : * 32 31 I.0 9.3 : 25.9 : ~ 31 30 4 3.7 : 16.7 : * 30 29 6 5.6 : 13.0 : * 29 28 2 1.9 . 7.4 :* 28 27 3 2.8 . 5.6 :* 27 26 2 1.9 . 2.8 :* 26 25 1 0.9 . 0.9 :+ 25 -----------------------------°---- -0-------25----°50------75-----100-- DATA REDUCTION: - -------------- 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: ------ ----- 38.2 MPH UPPER LIMIT OF 10 MPA PACE: - ----- 40.0 MPH LOWER LIMIT OF 10 MPH PACE: - ----- 31.0 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: ------------ ---° ~6.9~ (83 VEHICLES) PERCENT OVER PACE: ---------- ----- 6.5$ ( 7 VEHICLES) PERCENT UNDER PACE: --------- ----- 16.7$ (18 VEHICLES) SOth PERCENTILE (MEDIAN) SPEED: -- 33.6 MPH 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: ------ ----- 29.5 MPH STANDARD DEVIATION: --------- ----- 4.081 FILE: I,INCOLN MODE SPEED(S): ----°-------- -~--- 33,34 MPH . RECORD: 1 PREPARED BY: HART20G AND CRABILL, INC. 275 CENTENNIAL WAY. SUITE 208 TUSTIN, CA. 92780 PH. 714/731-9455 , I ' r i 15PD-Nq.Aap . ~. ' Radar Speed Survey Field Shee ~ ~ .... ~nu...u.u.mw 1~~4 ~u•WI ~~Mµ~ I1~Kt: E~ I tJ O~'~ WEATHER~ SUNn) `~ DATE~ Ia -~J I-~ 1 AC3ENCY~ L-1'^~ ~-' O L~ ST~L~ IT ROAD CONDfTION~ D~Y 9TART TiME~ ~= 3v PM ~E~~ PETLt~~p.~~ ~%PP1aJO ST Pc+Jp ~~J9 OBSERVER~ l7 LO~UN4` _ ENDTIME~ 3 3o PM LOCATON~_ ~1 TOT/d. AVERAGE CFifiiCAL PACE SPEED~ SPEED~ 6PEED~ CUMVUITNE (807H DIREC710N9) _ ~ pyEqqpE CRRiCAL PA~ 6PEED~ SPEED~ . SPEED~ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY ~FIEID REVIEW FORM STREET: MINTHORN STREET LOCATION: COLLIER AVENUE AND CHANEY STREET FIEID REVIEW BY: D. LOEUNG CNECKED BY: J. CItABILL . DATE: 10-31•97 PACTORS DIRECTION: WE5TBOUND OIRECTION> EASTBOUND A. PREVAILING SPEED DATA ~ DATE OF SURVEY 1031-97 10.91-87 LOCATION OP SURVEY WEST OF SPRING STREET WEST OF SPRING STREET 85TH PERCENTILE 36.3 MPH 76.3 MPH 10 MPH PACE 27-38 MPH 27.76 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 74.20°k 74.20% POSTED SPEED I~MiT 16 MPH (ADVISORI~ 16110 MPH (BETWEEN.COLLIER AND SPRING) ADVISORY B. ACCIDENT HISTORY NO.OF MONTHS COVERED 36 - SPEED-RELATE~ ACCIDENTS 0 - TOTAL ACCIDENTS 0 - ANNUALACCIDENTRATE O.OOACCIDENTSIYEAR - ACCiDENTSIMIL. VEH. MILES O.OO ACCIDENTSIMVM - C. TRAPPIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 1000 VEHICLES PER DAY - LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE 1 LANE TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP AT CHANEY STOP AT COLLIER CROSSWALKS NONE NONE PEDESTRIANIBICYCLES NOINO NOINO TRUCK TRAFFIC YES NO ~ ~ ONSTREET PARKING NONE OBSERVED, NOT RESTRICTED NONE OBSERVED, NOT RESTRICTED OTHER (SPECIPI~ D. ROADWAY FACTORS ~ LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) .65 MILES - VERTICAL CURVE NONE ~ NONE HORIZONTALCURVE NONE NONE LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD GOOD ~ SURFACE CONDITION GOOD ~ GOOD 51DEWALKSIDRIVEWAYS PARTIALIFEW PARTIALIPEW STREET LIGHTING YES YES OTHER (5PECIFY) E. ADJACENT LAND USES COMMERCIALNACANT LOT COMMERCIAWACANT LOTIRESIDENTIAL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 96 MPH 96 MPH SPEED LIMIT CHANGE? POST POST L A K E E L S.I N O R E R A D A R S P E E D D I S T R I B U T I O N STREET: ------------------ MINTHORN STREET LOCATION: ---------------- COLLIER AVENUE AND CHANEY STREET DIRECTION: --------------- EAST & WESTBOUND DATE OF SURVEY: ---------- 10-31-97 PERIOD OF SURVEY: -------- 11:00-12:00 NOON TOTAL VEHICLES 5UR~7EYED: - 62 SURVEY CONDUCTED BY: ----- D. LOEUNG ------ (MPH) ----------- FREQUENCY ------------ PERCENTAGE ----°- : ------------------------------------ ** CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE ** ------ ----------- -------------------0-------25------50------75-----100-- 44 1 1.6 :100.0 : * 44 43 0 0.0 : 98.4 : * 43 42 2 3.2 : 98.4 : * 42 41 0 0.0 : 95.2 : • 41 40 1 1.6 : 95.2 : • 40 39 2 3.2 : 93.5 : * 39 38 0 0.0 : 90.3 : " 38 37 2 3.2 : 90.3 : * 37 36 2 3.2 : 87.1 : u 36 35 3 4.8 : 83.9 : + 35 34 5 8.1 : 79.0 : * 34 33 7 11.3 : 71.0 : * 33 32 4 6.5 : 59.7 : ~ 32 31 4 6.5 : 53.2 : n 31 30 4 6.5 : 46.8 : * 30 29 4 6.5 : 40.3 : * 29 28 6 9.7 : 33.9 : • 28 27 7 11.3 : 24.2 : ~ 27 26 0 0.0 : 12.9 : * 26 25 4 6.5 : 12.9 : * 25 24 1 1.6 . 6.5 :* 24 23 0 0.0 . 4.8 :• 23 22 1 1.6 . 4.8 :* ZZ 21 0 0.0 . 3.2 :+ 21 20 1 1.6 . 3.2 :• 20 19 0 0.0 . 1.6 :* 19 18 1 1.6 . 1.6 :* la ---------------- °----------------° 0--°---25---°-50-°---~5-----100-- DATA REDUCTION: 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: ---------- - 35.3 MPH UPPER LIMIT OF 10 MPH PACE: ----- - 36.0 MPA LOWER LIMIT OF 10 MPH PACE: °--- - 27.0 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: ----------°---- - 74.2% (46 VEHICLES) PERCENT OVER PACE: -------------- - 12•9~ ~ 8 VEHICLES) PERCENT UNDER PACE: ------------- - 12.9% ( 8 VEHICLES) SOth PERCENTZLE (MEDIAN) SPEED: - - 30.5 MPH 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: ---°----- - 26.2 MPH STANDARD DEVIATION: ------------- - 5.148 MODE SPEED(S): ------------------ - 27,33 MPH FILE: MINTHORN RECORD: 1 ~ . . . . . . . . . SSPO-HCI.V~ Radar Speed Survey Field Sheet HuRZao~u+nCw W~ ~1H1 N+M. W M M IIU11H-W1 AOENCY~ Lf~{CF EI.,.S ~BI2C WEATHER~ SV~~ DA7E~ Id/;I/q~ : ttaR rl l ROAD CONDffION~ ~RY 3TART TIME ,~ ~=~Q Qm r ~ g7pEET, _'` ?TW~~~ (~(~~~ ~ry~ E G~{'Rf~FY S~ OBSERVER: D ~~~~ - ENDTIME~ ~=0d ~~`~ L LOCATON~ ~ TOTAL AVERA6E CFRICAL SPEED~ SPEED~ CUMULATNE (BOTH DIRECliON9) _ PACE SPEEI TOTAL qyEqppE CRRICAL PACE SPEED~ ~ SPEED~ SPEED~ J ' I l ~ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY ~ FIELD REVIEW FORM STREET:BTRICKLANDAVENUE LOCATION: CHANEYSTREETANDRNERSIDEDRIVE PIELD REVIEW BY: D. LOEUNG CHECKED BY: J. CRABILL DATE: 1031-87 FACTORS. DIRECTION: WESTBOUND DIRECTION: EASTBOUND A. PREVAILING SPEED DATA DATE OF SURVEY 10-37-97 70-71-97 LOCATIDN OF SURVEY WEST OF GEDGE WEST OF GEDGE 83TH PERCENTILE 24.9 MPH 24.9 MPH 10 MPH PACE 17-26 MPH 17-26 MPH PERCENT ~N PACE 65.30% 85.30% POSTED SPEED LIMIT 15I20 MPH (BETWEEN FOSTER AND RNERSIDE 76 MPH (ADVISORI~ (ADVISOR B. ACCIDENT HISTORY ~ NO.OF MONTHS COVERED 36 - SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 1 TOTALACCIDENTS ~ 1 - • ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE .37 ACCIDENTSIYEAR - ACCIDENTSIMIL. VEH. MILES 1.08 ACCIDENTS/MVM - 0. TRAFFIC FkCTORS ~ AVERAGE DAILY TRAFfIC 600 VEHICLES PER DAY - LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LqNE 1 LANE TRAFFIC CONTROLS NONE NONE ~ CROSSWALKS NONE NONE PEDESTRIANIBICYCLES NOINO NOINO TRUCKTRAFFIC NO NO ~ ONSTREET PARKING NONE OBSERVED NONE OBSERVED OTHER (SPECIFY) ~ D.~ROADWAYFACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 1.41 MILES - VERTICAL CURVE STEEP GRADES STEEP GRADES HORIZONTALCURVE S-CURVE „ S~CURVE LATERAL VISIBILITY POOR . . POOR ~ SURFACE CONDITION BAD ~ BAD ~ SIDEWALKSIDRIVEWAYS NOIYES NOIYES STREET LIGHTING YES YES OTHER (SPECIFY) E. ADJACENT LAND USES RESIDENTIAWACANT LOT RESIDENTWL/HILLSIDENACANT LOT RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH 25 MPH SPEED LIMIT CHANGE9 POST POST L A R E E L S I N O R E R A D A R S P E E D D I S T R I B U T I O N STREET: ------------------ STRICKLAND AVENUE LOCATYON: ---------------- CHANEY STREET TO RIVERSIDE DRIVE DIRECTION: --------------- EAST & WESTBOUND DATE OF SURVEY: ---------- 10-31-97 PERIOD OF SURVEY: -------- 9:40 AM - 10:50 AM TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED: - 34 SURVEY CONDUCTED BY: ----- D. LOEUNG (MPH) FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE : ** CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE ** °--------------- -------------------0-------25------50------75-----100-- 28 1 2.9 :100.0 : * 28 27 3 8.8 : 97.1 : * 27 26 1 2.9 : 88.2 : u 26 25 1 2.9 : 85.3 : + 25 24 3 8.8 : 82.4 : * 24 23 5 14.7 : 73.5 : * 23 22 5 14.7 : 58.8 : n 22 21 4 11.8 : 44.1 : * 21 20 4 11.8 : 32.4 : * ~ 20 19 2 5.9 : 20.6 : * ' 19 18 3 8.8 : 14.7 : * 18 17 1 2.9 . 5.9 : ~ 17 16 1 2.9 . 2.9 :* 16 ------------------------------------0-------25------50------75-----100-- DATA REDUCTION: 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: ---------- - 24.9 MPH UPPER LIMIT OF 10 MPH PACE: ----- - 26.0 MPH LOWER LIMIT OF 10 MPH PACE: ----- - 17.0 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: ---------------- - 85.3$ (29 VEHICLES) PERCENT OVER PACE: -------------- - 11.8$ ( 4 VEHICLES) PERCENT UNDER PACE: ------------- - 2•9~ ( 1 VEHICLES) SOth PERCENTILE (MEDIAN) SPEED: - - 21.4 MPA 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: ---------- - 18.0 MPH STANDARD DEVIATION: ------------- - 3.015 MODE SPEED(S): ------------------ - 22.23 MPH PREPARED SY: ~ HARTZOG AND CRABILL, INC. 275 CENTENNIAL WAY. SUITE 208 TUSTIN, CA. 92780 PH. 714/731-9455 FILE: STRICK RECORD: 1 , .x~ ... . . . . . .irx~~w.K~ ~ Radar Speed Survey Field Sheet SI.~fJN~' DATE~ lU-~iI~W^I . AGENCY~ ~-Pc{C~ ~I.~S I NO~E WEATiER~ g~p~~ 'STR IG{CL~~ a'JE~ V.~ ROAD CONDfTION~ ~PY 3TARTlIME~ a~ ~6 ~ -- •-- ~,.~.__„-.« ct- n..1~ R\~l~"2SiU~0R. oasERVea: 9, loEUrJC~ ENDTIME~ ~aSt~ RM ~ ~ y ~ ' PACt A~~`~ SPEED~ SPEED~ CRf11CAL PACt 6PEED~ 6PEED~ AVERAnE CHITICAL SPEED~ SPEE~` C{1~AULp,TIVE <BOTH DIRECl70N9) ~-