HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Reso No 2005RESOLUTION NO. 2005-1
_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
I THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
; APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. 2004-16
WHICH ENTAILS DESIGN REVIEW OF A FOUR-PLAN
MODEL HOME COMPLEX AND PRODUCTION UNITS
WHICH WILL BE CONSTRUCTED THROUGHOUT 127
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS WITHIN TRACT
MAP NO. 30493
WI IEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Pardee Homes
requesting Design Review approval of a four-plan Model Home Complex and ultiinate development
of production uniu throughout 1271ou within Tract Map No. 30493. The proposed residential lou
comprise approximately 30 acres and are located at the northeast comer of Canyon H'ills Road and
F~illside Drive and is defined as Planning Area 21A bythc Canyon Iidls Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Pluining Coiiurvssion of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Design Review requesu for residential projects; and
NOW THEREFORE, the Pluuiing Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Pluuiuig Coinmission has considered the proposed design for the four-
plan Model Home Complex and production units and has found them acceptable. The Plaruiuig
I! ~ Coumiission finds and deterniines this project is consistent with the Canyon I~'ills Specific Plan and
, the 2003 Addendum to the 1989 Final Canyon I~'ills Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report.
Under Section 15182 of the Califomia Environmental Qualiry Act (CEQA) Guidelines, this project
has been declared exempt from further environmental clearance.
SECI'ION 2. That in accordance with Section 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of Residential Project No. 2004-16 have
been made as follows:
1. Subjat to tl~e auad~el ~ioras tlae prop~~l prajaz zs Yrot arnicipatal to result in arry sigrr~ifuam adeerse
erairtmrrentcrl iyr~iacts.
Staff has determined that this project is consistent with the Canyon I~'ills Specific Plan and Tract
Map No. 30493. The 2003 Addendum to the 1989 Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report provides adequate environmental clearance and analysis for this
proposed Design Review application. Under Section 15182 of the Califomia Environmental
Qialiry Act (CEQA) Guidelines, this projea has been declared exempt from further
environmental clearance.
2. 7he projat mrrg~lies zeitb the Garls, Clhjatiu; arnl Pdiaa of the Ger~-al Plan arel the Ca~zyon HiUs Spazfic
Plary as apprar~d
As discussed, the General Plan designates the project site as"Canyon H~ls Specific Plan". The
; Canyon H'ills Specific Plan designates the project site as SF3. Tract Map No. 30493 and the
proposed model home complex and production units are consistent with the SF3 designation
and applicable development and design standards.
xESOLVrroN No. aoos- -
PAGE 2
3. Tbis prajax o~lic~ z¢ith tlae dgign dir~ius miuai~a' in ~iapter 17.82.060 a~acl all o~tl;er applicable
prozrsions ~theLakeElsirroreMzrra¢pal Ccde
The proposed project is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the project
will construct single-family detached uniu in accordance with appropriate development and
design standards contained in the Canyon H'ills Specific Plan. The project creates interest and
varying vistas as a person moves along any project street. The project also complemenu the
qualiry of e~sting neighboring development and will continue to provide visuall}~pleasing design
and architecture within the Canyon I~lls area.
4. Cor~irna ami safEguanls pursuant to aiapter 17. 82. 070, ir~dudi~ guararna~ a~xl ezider,e~ g~corrg~liame zaith
am~izior,s, haze Ix~iz irxrnjwratal iruo the approuzl gF the projat to ensure cG°~t ~' tl~e pnipercy in
aamz~me ~ceith the Ger,~ral Pla~y Mumapal Cal~ and Can}rmHills Sp~cPla~ as approcc~l
The Pluining Coinmission has considered the project and finds that with conditions of
approval, the project complies with the purposes and objectives of the Residential Design
Review process.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plam~ing Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE ResidentiahProiect No. 2004-16.
Lake Elsinore Plamung Comnussion
I herebycertifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Planning Conunission at a meeting
thereof conduaed on January 4, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATI'EST:
~
obert A. rady,
Planning Comm~
Commissioners: LAPERE, LARIMER, UHI.RY
Conuiussioners:
Conunissioners: O'NEAL
Conunissioners:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. 2004-17
WHICH ENTAILS DESIGN REVIEW OF A FOURPLAN
MODEL HOME COMPLEX AND PRODUCI'ION UNITS
WHICH WILL BE CONSTRUCI'ED THROUGHOUT ill
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS WITHIN TRACT
MAP NO. 31706
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Pardee Homes
requesting Design Review approval of a four-plan Model Home Complex and ultimate development
of production units throughout 1111ou within Traa Map No. 31706. The proposed residential lots
comprise approximately 30 acres and directly connect with the Crosscreek area to the nonh along
H'illside Drive and is defined as Planning Area 22 by the Canyon Hills Specific Plan; and
WI-IEREAS, the Plamung Cominission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Design Review requesu for residential projects; and
NOW '1'HEREFORE, the Planning Coinnvssion of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plaiuiuig Coiiunission has considered the proposed design for the four-
plan Model Home Complex and production units and has found them acceptable. The Plamiuig
, ~ Coiiunission finds and detemunes this project is consistent with the Canyon H'ills Specific Plan and
the 2003 Addendum to the 1989 Final Canyon H'ills Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report.
Under Section 15182 of the Califomia Environmental Q.ialiry Act (CEQA) Guidelines, this project
has been declared exempt from further environmental clearance.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Section 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of Residential Project No. 2004-17 have
been made as follows:
1. Subjat to tlae ~ arraditirnzs tlae propasal prvjat zs Yrot arniapalal to result in a~zy significaru adzerse
er~ci~vmrxntcrl arrq~aczs.
Staff has determined that this project is consistent with the Canyon H'ills Specific Plan and Tract
Map No. 31706. The 2003 Addendum to the 1989 Final Canyon E-3'ills Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report provides adequate environmental clearance and analysis for this
proposed Design Review application. Under Section 15182 of the Califomia Environmental
Qualiry Act (CEQA) Guidelines, this project has been declared exempt from further
environmental clearance.
2. The projat crnr~lies zezth the Garls, C~Sj~atizg and Pdicig ~the Gerreral Plan aml the ~~ryrnz Hills Spxifu•
Plary as appror~d
,, As discussed, the General Plan designates the project site as"Canyon I~lls Specific Plan". The
Canyon Hills Specific Plan designates the projea site as SF3. Tract Map No. 31706 and the
proposed model home complex and production units are consistent with the SF3 designation
and applicable development and design standards.
~,soLU~riorr No. a~s-a-
PAGE 2
3. This projaz crm~lies zvxb tlae daign di~rzizes aruai~l in d~apter 17.82.060 aYel all atlaer applicable
prozisirna cf theLakeElsirroreMura¢pal Cale
The proposed project is appropriate to the site and surrounding developmenu in that the project
will construct single-family detached uniu in accordance with appropriate development and
design standards contained in the Canyon F3ills Specific Plan. The project creates interest and
varying vistas as a person moves along any project street. The project aLso complemenu the
qualiry of existing neighboring development and will continue to provide visually-pleasing design
and architecture within the Canyon F3'ills area.
4. C:orttlitiora arni'safcguards purssz~arn to CY~apter 17.82.070, ireduding guararuar a~xl eziderze g~cor~liarxe z¢ith
mmlitirna, ha7e l~re irecrn[wrat~el iruo the apprazul ~ the projat to er~~ure decelopnrm of tlae prvperCy in
aarnda~ z¢ith tlae Ger,~ral Pla~y Mzrrruipal Cc~ arxl Ca~rnzH'zUs Sp~cPla~y as apprac~rL
The Plamiuig Coinn~ission has considered the project and finds that with condiuons of
approval, the project complies with the purposes and objectives of the Residential Design
Review process.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plam~ing Conunission of the City
of Lake ELsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Residential Project No. 2004-17.
~~
Ron LaPer Chau~man
Lake Elsinore Plaiui'uig Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plamiing Coiruivssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on January4, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
obert A Brady, S~
Planning Commiss:
Commissioners: LAPERE, LARIMER, UHLRY
Coinmissioners:
Conui~issioners: O'NEAL
Conunissioners:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-3
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CIT'Y OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF,THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DENIAL OF ZONE CHANGE
NO. 2004-10 WHICH PROPOSED CHANGING THE
ZONING DESIGNATION OF A PARCEL SPECIFICALLY
DESCRIBED AS APN (S) 377-110-052 AND -053 FROM M-1
(LIMITED MANUFACT'URING) TO G2 (GENERAL
CONIMERCIAL).
WI ~',RF.AS, The City of Lake Elsinore, had initiated proceedings to change the zoning
designation of the subject parcels known as APN(s) 377-110-052 and -053 from M-1 (I.imited
Manufacn.iiing) to C-2 (General Commercial); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Corrunission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of making recommendations to the City Council for changes to the approved
Zoning Map; and
WI~REAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Depanment and other
, interested parties at public hearing(s) held with respea ta this item on August 3, 2004, November 2,
2004 and January 18, 2005 and has considered and approved the reyuest by staff on August 3,
2004 to continue this item to the August 17, 2004 Planning Commission;
NOW 'THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Zone Change No.
2004-10, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council deny the proposed
amendment to the Zoning Map. The Planning Commission finds and determines that this Zoning
proposal has been deemed not to require additional envirorunental clearance because it implements
the General Plan for which an EIR was prepared.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake
Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Zone Change No. 2004-10 have been made as
follows:
1. The proposed zone change will not be; a) detrimental co the health, safety, comfort or
general welfare of the persons residing or working withir~ the neighborhood of the proposed
amendment or within the City, or b) injunous to the property or improvements in the
neighborhood or within the Ciry.
'71ae pro~nsed Zone Change has ~az anal~YZed rnlatzce m iu poterztiulity to l~ decrm~tul ro tl,~ health,
safety, mmfort and zzelfare of tl~ ~rsrnas msidmg or zernlzing witlim tl,p neighlon5oal of tl~ proposal
mr~audrmzt 71ae Zone Chmxge may Zn detrvnoztid to t!~ comfort ofgeneral zeelfare of tl,~ j~rsons rnsidmg rn'
zernkingwrthin d~ neigh(a~~af as tl~e pro~~rty acamc~s of the szrbjErt parmis has deridxl to not crnztriruewuli
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-3
Page 2 of ~
tl~ ye/at~el pro1ec~ C,onditional Use Pemut No. 2004-16. Svue tl~ pro[~rty arrme~s am not continuingzaitli
tl~ir recp~est fora C'.onditional Use Permi~ the Zone Chcmge is not naxla~at this time. .
2. The proposed action will be consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies pf the
General Plan and the development standards established with the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code (I.EMC). ,
Based on its analysis, staff has c~rcfudal that tl~ requested Zone Chan~ is not preferrt~l Ezrn tlaoc~gh tl~e
Zone Chcmge ~a.nuld bmzg rhe Zoning inro arr~plianm wiah d~e C'~eneral Plan, t!~ proj~rry oze~er is not
supprmice of tl,~ 7Ane Chang~at this trirre.
NOW,'1T~REFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the Cicy
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the Ciry Council of the Ciry of Lake
Elsinore deny Zone Change No.2004-10.
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on January 18, 2005 by the following voce:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Commissioners: LAPERE, I.,ARIlVIER, O~IEAL, UI lI.RY
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
~
obert A. Brady, City M~ ager
e
La(ie Elsinore Planning Corrunission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-16
FOR A RECREATIONAL VEHICLE SALES LOT AT 18791
DEXTER AVENUE (APN 377-110-053 AND A PORTION OF
377-110-052).
WI~REAS, an applicacion has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by William Maisel,
for approval of Conditional Use Pemut No. 200416 for a recreational vehicle sales lot at 18791
Deacter Avenue; and
WHERFAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of considering Conditional Use Pernuts per Section 17J4.050 of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code (I.EMC); and
WF3EREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plam~ing Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Communiry Development Department and other
interested parties a[ public hearing(s) held with respect to this item on August 3, 2004, November 2,
2004 and January 18, 2005 and has considered and approved the request by staff on August 3,
2004 to continue this item to the August 17, 2004 Planning Commission.
NOW 'ITIEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HF.RF.BY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for a
recreational vehicle sales lot and has found it unacceptable. The Planning Commission fmds and
determines this project is not consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and that
this action is exempt from furcher environmental clearance under Seccion 15303, Class 3, of the
Califomia Env,irorunental Quality Act (CEQA).
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17J4 (Conditional Use Pernut) of the Lake
Elsinore IYlunicipal Code the following findings for the denial of this requesc have been made as
follows
1. ' The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is not in accord
with the objectives of the General Plan and [he purpose of the planning district in which the
site is located
In order w achiecr a zeeU balmu~el and finzcko~ral mix of residential, cm~r,~rcial, in~strral, oj,~z spac~,
rsrreatioaanl cmd uasciuuiaial land uses, sraff has ~hly eza/aucrerl r!~ land Hse c~rrqaZUbility, nozse> traffic
and otlx~-~cu~tul ha~rds mlated to th~ proposed Condirional Use Pem~it for ramatianal zphide saler
lot at 18791 Dexter Az~rnre. Aau~zlirigly, as tlae appli~mt is aanr~illnzg to make thp chcmges as
rttv~ar.ardal by t{~ applirable ag~uies, dejznvrrazts and Plarming ~ssion, tJ~ prop~sed limd use is not
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-04
PAGE NO. 2 OF 3
in cauz~rranez~ul~ tl~ obj~irzs of tl.~ C~eneral Plan and the purp~ose of tbe plarm»sgdistrict in za,~iufi tl,~ site
is laated
2. The proposed use may be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general
welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the
City, or may be injurious to properry or improvements in the neighborhood or the Ciry.
In am~rdwul~ tl,~ purposes of tl~e Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use PermitsJ of tl,~ Lake Elsinare
Municipal Cale, tl~ City realized that th~e propnnserl r~mational zr~iicle sales lot at 18791 DexterAzenue
mry hace a potenual to nEgatizely irryxra tl,~zzelfare o}~P~rsores n'sidm8 orzern~kingzviuhin tlae neigbla~rlx~al
or tlae Ciry. Since tJae applicmrtzeas arrcrvillriag to address sperifu issues ic(eriuft~l by staJ}; the prn~az has the
jnteniial to 1~ detnrrre~ztal to tl,~general hpalth, safety, canforZ, orgeneralzeelfare of tl~ surrnamcling
neighlorlaat ar tF~ City.
3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use,
however, the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features are not
consistent with the requirements contained by Title ll of the LEMC.
7~ pro~nsed r~emaciaial z~liicle sales lot lor~ued az 18791 Dexter Az~zue has not l~z derigns~ in
ca~uideratiaz of tl~ size and shafr of tlae prn/~rty. Tl.~ projaz as pro/~sal by tl.~ applicantzenll ded-act fron
tl.~ qualiry of existmg der.~loprr,a~rt anddoes not provule an adequate buf}er Eetre~rn tlae praposed and existmg
~~•
4. The site for the proposed use does not relate to streets and highways with a proper design
both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by
the subjea use.
77~ pro/x~se~use loriual at 18791 Dexter Az~nue has l~c reuiece~l as to iu relation w tl~widtb and ty~
of/~xnaaxt ne~lez'to cany tlae type and gucmtity of traff'icgeneratee~ in that tlae City has adequately
eualirat~f tl,~ poterztial irn/aacrs assaiated with tl,~ pro~nsaf r«macwnal zehule sales loG Based on tln's
ezaGaation staff'has dete»rrine~that tl~ pro~ert dces not adec~reuutely seize or pmu~ide safe and reasonableaaxss
for traf~ie utzlizing thp public fight-0f~y.
5. In approving the subject use located at 18791 Deaccer Avenue, there will be adverse affects
on abutting property or the pernutted and normal use thereof.
The pro~t as p~vposal will adzersely affxt abcstcazg proj~rry and t!~ p~mutta~andnarrr~rl use of tl~
ProP~"~Y•
6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17J4.50 of the LEMC were not
incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Permit insuring that the use continues
in a manner envisioned by the General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
Punuant to Seczirnz 17.74.050 (Actiaz of tl.~ Plannazg Conartission) of tlm Lake Elsirtom Municipal Cale
(LEMCJ, the rt~rational z~liicle sales lot larat~t' at 18791 Dexter Az~m.re7eas scl,~edulez'far mnsiderakaz
of tl~ Plmming Cavranissiaz clespite tlae insuffuierrcy of tl,~ pro~nsed use.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-04
PAGE NO. 3 OF 3
NOW, THEREFORE, based on che above Findings, the Planniug Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY DENY
I hereby cenify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plaiuiing Cominission at a meeting
thereof conducted on January 18, 2005 by the following vote.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
l~
Ro A. Bradv, City I'
Commissioners: LAPERE, I.ARIMER, O~IEAL, LJI~.RY
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Lake Elsinore Plaru~ing Cominission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-5
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE
TRACT' MAP NO. 33191.
WI-IEREAS, an applicadon has been filed with the Ciry of Lake ELsinore by Evan Mai, to
subdivide certain propeny mto 5 parcels for future residential lou; and
WI IEREAS, the Pluuzing Conunission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of malfliig recommendations to the Ciry Council pertaining to the subdivision of
land; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Comnvssion
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on January 18, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Couunission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plaiuiing Conuiilssion has considered the proposed subdivision (TTM
No. 33191), prior to maliing a decision to recommend that the Ciry Council approve the proposed
subdivision into 5 residential lots. The Plaiuiuig CoiYUivssion finds and deternunes that this project
is exempt pursuant to CEQA, which exempu infill projecu 5 acres or less.
SECI'ION 2. That in accordance with State of Califomia Subdivision Map Act, and the
Ciry of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Tentadve Tract Map No. 33191
have been made as follows:
1. The progosed subdivision, together with the provisions for the design and improvement, are
consistent with the General Plan; Zoning Code; Tide 16 of the Municipal Code relating to
Subdivisions; and the State Subdivision Map Act.
77ae projat is crnaistern zeix6i the daignatal laml use playmi~ amd, dezelopirent arad design starnlarzk, arnl all
arher approjrrrate ~uiren~nt,s mrnitir,~l in the Ger~eral Pla~ Zorri~ CaJ~ CiZy Murricipal Ccd~ arul
SuGaazisionMapAcG
2. The proposed subdivision is compadble with the objectives, policies, general land uses and
programs specified in the General Plan (Govemment Code Section 66473.5).
The projaz zs crnaistent zeith the la~' use plary dezelopm~u arnl design sta~lanLs and prngra~, arnl all otG~-
approPriatz r~uzrerrents mmairexl in the Gerteral Plan
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-5
PAGE TWO
3. The effects this proposed subdivision is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the
public service requiremenu of iu residents, and the available fiscal and environmental resources
have been considered and balanced.
7hee projaz zs cmaistern ~zith the City's Gerreral Plan arel Zanng Cal~ ~eill proude ~sary public serac~ arnl
faczlities, ~ezll pay all appro[rriate fa3, aml zzill ~ r~rult in anyadzerse enziramrental arrpuct
4. The design of the subdivisions provides to the greatest ea~tent possible, for future passive or
natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision (Govemment Code Secdon 664123).
71ae projat zeill corr~ly -ceirh all apprv,miate cnrseruztion ra~irerrerns ~'the Cityarul UrriformBuildzng Ccrle
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Coimivssion of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMNIEND that the Ciry Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve Tentative Tract Map No. 33191.
~
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Couuiussion
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plamiing Cominission at a meeting
thereof conducted on January 18, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Conunissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, LARIMER, UI II.RY
NOES: Cominissioners:
ABSEN'I': Conunissioners:
ABSTAIN: Coirunissionexs:
ATTEST:
~
bert A. Brady, Secret to the
l2nning Comnvssion
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAI' NO. 31901.
WI IEREAS, an application has been filed with the Ciry of Lake Elsinore by D&D Cattle,
LLC, to subdivide certain property into 6 parcels for future cominercial manufacturing lou; and
WHEREAS, the Plamiiug Coimrvssion of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of malflng recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the subdivision of
land; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plamiing Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on Februaiy 1, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Comnvssion of the City of Lake Elsmore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plam~ing Commission has considered the proposed subdivision (TPM
No. 31901), prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed
subdivision into 6 commercial manufacturing lou. The Plamiuig Commission finds and determines
that this project is exempt pursuant to CEQA, which exempu infill projects 5 acres or less.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State of California Subdivision Map Act, and the
Ciry of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 31901
have been made as follows:
1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for the design and improvement, are
consistent with the General Plan; Zoning Code; Tide 16 of the Municipal Code relating to
Subdivisions; and the State Subdivision Map Act.
71ae prvjax zs cmaistern zeith tlae daignatal larui' use pla~ring ar~, dereloprrrrn arul daign starnlarcls, arnl all
arher upPropriate r~aren~rrts mmai~l in the Genei-al Plar~ Zoning Caf~ C'uy M~.tnicipal Cal~ arnl
SuEdizisionMapAcc
2. The proposed subdivision is compauble with the objectives, policies, general land uses and
programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5).
71~e projat zs cmaisteru z¢ith the larnl use pla~y dereloprrern arul design stamlarzls arel prograyrs, a~l all otlaer
a,ojnvpnate r~uirerrerrts m~uai~l in the General Plan
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-13
PAGE TWO
3. The effects this proposed subdivision is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the
public service requiremenu of its residenu, and the available fiscal and envirorunental resources
ha~e been considered and balanced.
77ae projat is crnaistzrn z¢ith the Cuy's General Plan ara~' Zoni~ Ccd~ z¢ill jm~ude ~raessary public seruces arnl
faalities, z¢ill pay all appro[r~'iate fces, asxl wll ymt r~sult in a~zy adzene erc~ironrrental irr~iact
4. The design of the subdivisions provides to the greatest extent possible, for future passive or
natural heating or cooling opponwuties in the subdivision (Government Code Section 66412.3).
71aee projat z¢ill cvrrg~ly-ceith all appropriate mreerrtttzon ~uir~~~ms of the Ciry arnl UraformBzrilc(i~ Ca~e
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Pluuiing Coixux~ission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMNIEND that the Ciry Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 31 "^'
I hereby certifythat the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plazui'uig Con~nvssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on February 1, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Cominissioners:
Commissioners:
Comu~issioners:
Conuivssioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
~~
ben A. Brady, ' Manager
Lake Elsinore Plaru~ing Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-14
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR
COMMERCIAL PROJECT NO. C 2004-11, A REMODEL OF
KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN/TACO BELL
RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 31257 RIVERSIDE DRIVE -
APN 379-222-023 & 024
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Ciry of Lake Elsinore by Cuiiunings
Signs for Minor Design Review of Commercial Project No. C 2004-11 for the remodeling of an
e~sting structure and the redesign and replacement of sis (6) wall signs for a fast food restaurant
known as KentuckyFried Chicken (KFG~/Taco Bell; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of recommending approval for the Minor Design Review for the commercial
remodeling projecu and;
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plamung Coimivssion
has considered evidence presented by the Communiry Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on February 1, 2005; and
NOW THEREFORE, the Pluu~ing Comnvssion of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECI'ION 1. The Planning Cominission has considered the proposed Minor Design
Review for the commercial remodeling of an e~sting fast food restaurant and the redesign and
replacement of six (6) wall signs an has found that the project is acceptable. Pursuant to Section
15311, C1ass 11, Accessory Suuctures, the project has been found to be exempt from the California
Environmental QualityAct, (CEQA).
SECI'ION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following find'mgs for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will complywith the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The propasal mrrarercial rerrrxl~i~ pmjat lcrate~ at 31257 Ri~cerside Drize a»r~olis z¢irh the ~s arxl
abj~rius of the LEMCamI the Cuy's General PlanarelMur¢apal Ca/e
2. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in anysignificant adverse environmental impacts.
Punz~am to the Californiu Enrirvnm~rtal Qyal'uy Ad (CEQA), tl~e propasa~ re~r.aleling projaz laut~l at
31257 Rizerside 13rize as r~zizra~l aml mr~iona~ by all applicable C'zty Diusions, Departyrerns arnl A~erxia,
zzill Yrot haze a signifuarn effat on the e~zurnmrer2 punr~aru to S~ion 15311, Class Il, Aarssory Sm2aura,
~~QA~•
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-14
February 1, 2005
PAGE 2 OF 2
3. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
Tl~e pro~nsal arrraieiaal rerrcdel prnjat lor~tt~el at 31257 Rizenide Drize is appropriate to the sire ancl
s~.mnunding da~op~us in that the mnvreraal prajat has l~rz desigrrerl in anaicleration ~the size arnlshupe of
tlae p~vpert~s
NOW, '1T iEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plamiiiig Comnvssion of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE the Desi 'ew for the commercial
remodeling project, Coirunercial Project No. C 2004-1
~
Ron LaPere, Chairii~an
Lake Elsinore Planning Conuivssion
I herebycertifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Plamiuig Conunission at a meeting
thereof conducted on Febn.iaxy 1, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Coiruivssioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSEN'I': Conu7vssioners:
ABSTAIN: Comnvssioners:
ATTEST:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-15
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1011 MILL STREET -
APN 373-093-013
WI IEREAS, an application has been filed with the Ciryof Lake Elsinore byDavid Saenz requesting
approval of a Minor Design Review for a Single Family Residences pursuant to Chapter 17.82
(Design Review), Chapter 17.23 (R 1 Single Family Residential District) and Chapter 17.14
(Residential Development Standards) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMG~.
WHEREAS, the Plam~uig Commission of the City of Lake ELsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Minor Design Review requests for Single Family Residential Projects;
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Comnvssion
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on Febiuary 15, 2005 and;
NOW THEREFORE, the Plannuig Conunission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
' SECI'ION 1. The Plannuig Cocnmission has considered the proposed design for the single
family residence and has found it acceptable. The Planning Conunission finds and deterxnines this
project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. This project has been found to be
exempt from further environmental clearance under Section 15303, Class 3(a) (New Construction or
Convexsion of Small Suuctures), of the Califomia Environmental QualityAct (CEQA).
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will complywith the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The j»oposal Mirror Design Rerierr~ lcratal at 1011 Mill Stra~ co~rq~lie ~ceith the garLs aml a~h~'~rius of tJae
Ger,~ral Plary in tl~at tbe approuzl q~'tlae si~(~fanaly ~rsiderse zazll asszst in adriecing tlae derelopn~rn ~'a ze~'l-
bzla~l a~ad finxtional ~x ~'~sideraia~ mrrm~zia~ im/irstria~ opaz spac~ ra~atzort~l and instit~-rtional laral
usg as z¢ell as er,muraging the derelopm~u aml ~rttirnena~xe q~a bmzd ran~ ~hausi~ ty[~es }~ar all i7xmre
groups arul age cat~vri~s.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
71ae ]rropasal Mirror Dsign Reuerv lcrate~ at 1011 Mill Strz~ is appropriate in the size a~xl surra~i~
deceloprient in that tlae singlefcrarely residerse zeill ~lenrrtt the Rr~aluy ~eeisting decelop~reru arel zeill cmate
a zisa+ally pleasi~ nonclet~-actize relatianship l~tzererc tlae p~v[xsal ayel erzsting proj~ts in that the a>dnx«ti.rral
desigry a~orarnl ~rttterials propase~ ~t ar erca~l tJae size arxl design gFtlae horres in thesumm~ac(i~area,
RESOLUI'ION NO. 2005-15
PAGE 2 OF 2
FEBRUARY 15, 2005
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in anysignificant adve~se environmental impacts.
71ae propasal Mi~aar D~sign Reciecv Icratea' at 1011 Mill St~ as rezieze~~ arxl mrad'niar~zi' by all appliruble
City Dizisions arel Departmmts ared A~erxie, zeill n~ haze a sigrufarant ~'az on th~e erc~irrnvrerrt pursyarn to
A~tide 19 (C'atEgoriral Exerrq~tionsJ a~xl Sation 15303, dass 3(aJ (1Vecv~Coristruction ar Crnzzersion g~Sm~ll
Strrutu~rs) ~tlae Califrnnia E~zci~anrrernal Q~ral~uyAct (CEQA).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including
guaiantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the properry in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Minar D~sigiz ReLiecv ~'a sir~gle fa~raly mside~xe lorata~ at 1011 Mill Str~t has l~z euriz~atal pursa~aru to
Satiora 17.82.100 (MiYarr Design ReueuJ gF th~ Lake Elsirrore Murnapal Cale (LEMC) a7xl all other
applica&'e Sazior~s ~'tlae LEMC The prnjar zrus fa~axl to J~ in c~liarne zvrh all rcgti/ations aml abjazizes of
LEMC
NOW, TT-~REFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plaunuig Conuivssion of the City
of I.ake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Minor e'gn Revie a Single Family Residence
located at 1011 Mill Street.
Ron LaPere, Ch '
Lake Elsinore Pluuiuig Coi7uivssion
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Pluinuig Conunission at a meeting
thereof conducted on Febniary 15, 2005 bythe followmg vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER, UHLRY
NOES: Comn~issioners:
ABSENT: Conunissioners:
ABSTAIN: Comnvssione~:
vC '
A.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~, ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-
19 - FOUR MANUFACI'URED HOMES TO BE LOCATED
AT 316 N. LEWIS STREET, ]2i2 W. POTTERY STREET,
1203 AND 1205 W. SUMNER AVENLTE. (APN 374-082-003,
374-092-001,374-092-019, AND 374-092-020).
Wf-IEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Delco Hagan,
Hagan Investments, to request Residential Design Review of four manufactured homes to be
located at 316 N. Lewis Street, 1212 W. Pottery Street, and 1203 & 1205 W. Sucnner Avenue.
WI~REAS, the Plamiuig Conunission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Design Review requesu for residential design review per Section
17.82.100 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code; and
NOW THEREFORE, the Plannuig Conunission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECI'ION 1. The Plannuig Conuivssion has considered the proposed design for the single
family detached dwellings and has found them acceptable. The Planning Coinmission finds and
determines this project is consistent with the I.ake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMGj and that this
action is exempt from further environmental clearance under Section 15332, Class 32, of the
Califomia Environmental QualityP,c[ (CEQA).
SECI'ION 2. That in accordance with Section 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
71ae propasal ResiderrCial D~ign Reziezv lcratxl at 316 N. L ezeis Stra~ 1212 W. Pa¢tery Stra~ 1203 fr
1205 W. SumTer A ~ernre mrr~ili~,s z¢irh tlae gcals and objsxi-ces ~'the General Plary in that the apprrowl g~the
propasa~ horres zeill assist in erx~sraging the dere%prrent arul mzarrter~ame ~a brmcl ra~e ~'h~rsi.ng types for
all ineorregroups a~'age rat~or'~es.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
71~z propasal R~identictl Design ReziezvProjax loratal at 316 N. L ecvs Str~ 1212 W. Pouery Strc~ 1203
fr 1205 W. Su~m~rAzemre is app~vvpriate to tlae sixe and surr~rru~ing ~ in that tlae sing[e fa~raly
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-16
PAGE NO. 2
horms haee l~z deigr,ezl in crnaideratzon ~the size aral sl.~pe ~tlaeP%oert~ tJaembY cmating imerest arx~'
zurying zistus as a person ~mz~ along the stra~ F~~rther the pmja2 as p~vpasal zeill am~lerrem tlae c~ualzty ~
eristir~g derelopm~n arnl zeill create a zisually pleasin~ rro~rde~ractize relationship l~tzecen tlae prop~sal arnl
eeisti~ projau in that the ard~itatural desigrg az~or arxl nuterial.s propasa~ eeca~(s the size arxl deig~z ~'tlae
ho~r~ in the szarr~a'ingama.
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in anysignificant adverse environmental impacts.
Purs~ant to the Qrlifrnnia E~zciron~rental Qyal'uy Act (CEQAJ, the prvposez' Residendal Daign Reaezv
lcratal at 316 N. L ereis Str~y 1212 W. P~tery Stn~ 1203 f~ 1205 W. Su~rn~-A zerw~ as reziera~l arxl
mrd'uiorraz' by all applicable City Dizisirna a~acl Departneius a~acl A~erxies, ~zi1l rmt haze a signifuarn ~'at on
tJae er~cironrrent pursuarn to AYtzdz 19 (Categorical Exemptrons~ and Sazion 15332 (In-Fill
De velopment Pmjects).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject projea to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursz~aru to S~ion 17.82.100 (Mi~ror Design Reuera~ ~the Lake Elsirrore Municzpal Cale (LEMCJ, the
propasa~ Residerrtial D~sign Reuc~ lcratal at 316 N. Lervs Str~y 1212 W. P~tery Str~y 1203 F~ 1205
W. Su~rnaerA~zrnre has (~z sd.~lr~lxl a~l cmaider~l farappmrul by the Planning C'.rnrmvssion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above F' gs, the Plamiuig Conunission of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBYAPPROVE Reside~esign~wNo. 2004-19.
Ron LaPere, Chau•ii~an
Lake Elsinore Plamung Coimnission
I herebycertifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Planning Conunission at a meeting
thereof conducted on Febivary 15, 2005 bythe folloanng vote:
AYES: Comcnissioners
NOES: Comnvssioners:
ABSEN"I': Conunissioners:
LAPERE, GONZALES, L[1RIMER, UHI.RY
O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Conmvssionexs:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-16
PAGE NO. 3
ATTEST:
~
Robe A. Brady, Secretaryto e Plamung Coumvssion
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 16899 WELLS
AVENLTE - APN 38-255-009 & 010.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Emesto Robles
and Maria Espinoza requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for a Single Family Residence
pursuant to Chapters 17.82, and 17.14 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code;
WHEREAS, the Planning Cominission of the City of I,ake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of approving Minor Design Review requesu for Single Family Residenual Projects;
WI~REAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Couunission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on March 1, 2005 and;
NOW THEREFORE, the Pluuiing Coinii~ission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plaxu~uig Comcnission has considered the proposed design for the single
family residence and has found it acceptable. The Plaunuig Conunission finds and detemunes this
projea is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the Historic ELsinore Architectural
Design Standards. This project has been found to be exempt from fwther environmental clearance
under Section 15303, Class 3(a) Neze~ Corst~ua~ion ar Corece~sion ~Smrll Shuaures, of the California
Environmental QualityAct (CEQA).
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will complywith the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
Tlae propasalMinrn-Design Reuervlcrataz'at 16899 Wells Aierwe o~lza zeith tJae garls ayxl objatius ~the
General Pla~ in tl~zt tl~e appraurl ~'tlae sir~gle fanaly resideme zeill asszst in ad7iezi~ the de~eloprr~u ~'a zedl-
&zlane~l arel furxt ~ional ~c of residernza~ mrivrerria~ i~a'i~stria~ op~rz spac~ rrxreac'rrn~al and i~atirutirnral larnl
uses as ze~l as ertta.n-aging the dezeloprrent aml ~ruir2ename g~a bmzd rar~ge ~l~sin8 ty~ }~or all irxmre
groups and a~e rat~Ories.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-17
March 1, 2005
Page 2 of 2
The propasal Minor Design Reiiervlcratal at 16899 Wells Azerwe is appr~rriate in the size arrcl surnanading
d~eloprrent in that the sing~fayroly yesiderae zvll ~lerrem the Rs~crluJ' ~existi~ de~re~u a~' ~aill c~rate
a vsr~crlly plPUSin~ rron-d~ructize relatirnzship l~tzea~z the propasal arxl eristing proj«ts in that the ardritatural
d~sigry cdorar~l mzterials ~a~ ~ oreeca~l tlae size ared design ~tlae horrrs in tl~e s~srnnaxlingamcr.
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to resuk
in any significant advexse environmental impacu.
Tl~e propasal Minor Design Retiec~ lorat~el at 16899 Wells Azemte as reuece~ei' aYxl mred~itior.~zl by all
applitable C'uy Divsions and Depa~tyrems and A~ui~, zeill yrot laaze a signifuarn effaz on the er~iyomre~u
pu~srearn to Amde 19 (Cat~~enzcal Exerr¢'itiaasJ are~' S~io~z 15303, Gass 3(a) (Nera~ Canstrr.uzzon ar
Crnzcersion ~Smrll Stnutures) ~the Califoirria E~zcirornrental Qual'uyAct (CEQAJ.
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including
guarazitees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the properry in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
MiyrorDgigzReaera~of a Single-FaaralyRaiderxe loratal at 16899 Wells Azern~e Ixrs Jx~rc eurluatal puna~aarn
to Sation 17.82.100 (Miyror Dgign Rerzeu~ ~tlae Lake Elsiyrore Murucipal Cale (LEMC) and all arl~-
, upplifable Saz~irna g~the LEMC Thz projat zuts fwTrel to l~ in anrg'iliarne 77eztth ull n~ulatzons aml ahj~rzius of
LEMC
NOW, TI-IEREFORE, based on the above F' mgs, the Pluu~iiig Conunission of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Mino Des~ n or a Single-Family residence
located at 16899 Wells Avenue. c~ ~~
Lake Elsinore Platuiuig Commission
I herebycertifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Plaiuiuig Comnvssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on March 1, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Coinn~issioners: LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER, UHI.RY
NOES: Conunissioners:
ABSENT: Cominissioners: O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Conunissioners:
ATTEST: ~
Ro rt A. B dy, Secretazy to e Plamiuig Conunission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-18
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORrTIA,
APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 16915 WELLS
AVENLJE - APN 38-255-011 & 0i2.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Ciry of Lake Elsinore byErnesto Robles
and Maria Espinoza requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for a Single Family Residence
pursuant to Chaptexs 17.82, and 17.14 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code;
WHEREAS, the Pluuiing Conunission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Minor Design Review requesu for Single FamilyResidential Projects;
WI~REAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plaunuig Comcnission
has considered evidence presented by the Communiry Development Department and other
interesteu parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on March 1, 2005 and;
NOW THEREFORE, the Plamvng Commission of the Ciry of Lake ELsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed design for the single
family residence and has found it acceptable. The Planning Coimiussion finds and determines this
project is consistent with the I.ake Elsinore Municipal Code and the I~'istoric Elsinore Architectural
Design Standards. This project has been found to be exempt from further environmental clearance
under Secuon 15303, Class 3(a) (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), of the
California Environmental QualiryAa (CEQA).
SECI'ION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
Tl~e propasal Minor Design ReuEw(cxatal at 16915 Wells Az~inre crnr~laa ~cvrh tbe gttls arnl objazius ~the
Ger,~ral Pla~y in that the approu:l g~th~ sir~le~farroly/ resider,ee zezll assist in ao'~iecing tlae dezelop~rent of a z¢ell-
IX1Idii~ dYK~ fZpX.~'~LOYlQZ YY2C (~YFS1CI21711Q~ CbY1DYC/T7Qy ZYC~ZISZYld~ 0~12 S1JQCC~ YKYFCIZZOYICII dYK~ ZYLSClLZ1tZOYlI[Z ICIYK~
use as zeell as erapuraging tlae derdop»rnt ar,a' rmintenanee g~a braxcl ra~ ~I~sznB ~"YP'~ }~ar all i~acnrre
groups arul a~ ratc~orie~.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-18
March 1, 2005
Page 2 of 2
77ae prnpasal MirrorDerign ReciEwlorutal at 16915 Wells Azertt~e is appropriate in the size arnl surrrnr~ng
derzlop»prn in that the singl~fa~raly residerr~ ~rill mrr~lerr,eru the Rr~aluY ~eezsting deulopnrnt arnl z¢ill crzate
a vsz~nlly pleasin~ nrnz-cl~ractize ra'atior~ship l~tze~n the propas~rl aml existing projats in that the ardiitErtural
daigrg az~arand mzterials pro[rasal m~t oreecz~l the size aral da~ign ~the horrrs in thesurrw~rr,a'ingarra.
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in anysignificant adverse environmental impacu.
71~e propasal Mzrror Daign Reaer~ lcratal at 16915 Wells Azerwe as yecierattl arxl arred'uior~l by all
applirable City Diusions arecl Departrrerrts and A~mig, zaill rrot haze a sigrufi~ant effax on the e~zzinmm>rrt
pursr~asrn to Artide 19 (~tEgoriral Exerrq7tians) a~acl Sation 15303, C~ass 3(a) (Neiv Crnatruction ar
Cor~ersion of Sm~ll ScnuzznsJ ~the Califorrria Enzi~r~mal Qual'uyAct (CEQA).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including
guarazuees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
MirrorDesigrzRevzr~~a Si,r~gleFaa~vlyResiderxe lcrata~l at 16915 Wells A~ceiwel~as lx~z eurlr~ataz'pur~z~aarn
to Sazion 17.82.100 (Mirror D~ign ReueceJ ~the Lake Elsi~ Mzaucipal Ccde (LEMC) aYel all oth~-
applicaJ~'e Sazions ~'th~e LEMC 71~e proja~ zezrs found to l~ in crnr~liarxe ~¢ith all ~gulatians aml d~ja2izes g{'
LEMC
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above gs, the Plannuig Conunission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE ~ r D ign ~`,\for a Single-Family residence
located at 16915 Wells Avenue.
Ron LaT~ere, Chairin~
Lake Elsinore Plamiuig Conuivssion
I herebycertifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Pluiniiig Cominission at a meeting
thereof conducted on March 1, 2005 bythe following vote:
AI'ES: CoinmissioneTS: LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER, UHLRY
NOES: Comaussioners:
ABSEN'I': Cominissioners: O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST•
R ert A. Brady, Secretaryto e Plaunuig Coimivssion
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF
FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH SECTION
6.1.2 OF THE MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT
CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) FOR THE
PROJECT KNOWN AS "OAK GROVE
CROSSING".
WHEREAS, a site specific focused survey for Nanow Endemic Plant Species is required
by Section 6.1.2 of the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSCHP) for the purpose of
developing an commercial shopping center; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore evaluated the consistency of the project with the
(MSHCP); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendation to the City Council adopting the Findings of
Consistency with the MSHCP; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered and approved the request by staff on March 1, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE as follows:
The Biological Survey Report prepared by L& L Environmental Inc. has been prepared,
submitted and reviewed in accordance with requirements of the Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The report is complete and adequate in iYs evaluation of
all environmental effects of the project known as Lakeview Villas Condominium project
and will not preclude the implementation of the MSHCP goals, based on the following
finding;
FINDINGS-MLJI.TIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN
1. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species
Guidelines.
Amm~ing to the Multiple Sp~ Habitat Coiaerrution Plan (MSHCPJ, "i~ixl~in iderrt~l Nanvzv~
Ere%rr¢c Pla~u Spaies suney amas [1VEPSSAJ, sitespazfic fausa~ surie~s for Narrozv~Enderrnc Plarn
Spaza shall l~ ra~uin~l for aU pul~ic ared prizttte pmja~s wher~ appmpriate habitat is presenP'.
In k~pi~ zzith the Bidogi¢rl Surtey Report przpaml by L f~ L E nzimrnrerual I~x on July 2, 200, sinee
rro appmpriate habixat for 1Vanvza~EndenacPlarn Sp~ies zs p~sem on site far~sal surre~s are n~ ~ui~L
U:\rpreisendanz\Target\PC RESO MSHCP.doc
RESOLUTION NO 2005-19
PAGE 2 OF 2
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore adopt the Findings of Consistency Secti n..2.
Ron La re, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on March 1, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER, UHLRY
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
~
R ert A. Brady, Secretary ~ the Planning Commission
U:\rpreisendanz\Target\PC RESO MSHCP.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-20
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
TAE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH NO.
2004111053) FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS OAK
GROVE CROSSING LOCATED AT ASSESSOR PARCEL
No(s) 377-120-007 & A PORTION OF 008.
WHEREAS, Glen Daigle, Daigle Development, LLC has initiated proceedings to adopt
the Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 20041 1 1 05 3); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of recommending to the City Council adoption of the Draft
Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2004 1 1 1 053); and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on March 1, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the adequacy of the Draft
Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2004 1 1 1 05 3) prior to making a decision to recommend
that the City Council adopt the Draft Environmental Impact Report. The Planning Commission
finds and determines that the Draft Environmental Impact Report is adequate and prepazed in
accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which
analyzes the environmental effects of the proposed project prior to City Council certification,
based upon the following findings and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the adoption of Draft Environmental Impact Report
(SCH No. 2004111053) have been made as follows:
1. Changes or akerations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid
or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Draft EIR
Based on the information provided in the Draft EIR prepared for the subject project
known as the Dak Grove Crossing, it was concluded that specific overriding economiq
legal, social, technological or other benefits of the project outweigh the one (1)
unavoidable impact (air quality) that cannot be avoided and that with the recommended
mitigations, the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
- PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION FOR
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Page 2 of 2
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore certify Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2004 1 1 1 05 3).
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on March 1, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER, UHLRY
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: UHLRY
ABSTAIN
ATTEST:
~obert :A. Brady,
Planning Commi;
Commissioners:
to the
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-21
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE FOR THE SECOND CYCLE
OF TAE CALENDAR YEAR 2005 APPROVAL OF
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2004-02 AMENDING
THE GENERAI. PLAN LAND USE MAP OF THE
PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 33056, ASSESSOR
PARCEL NO(s) 377-120-007 & A PORTION OF 008 FROM
BUSINESS PARK AND LIMITED INDUSTRIAL TO
GENERAL COMMERCIAL.
WHEREAS, Glen Daigle, Daigle Development, LLC has initiated proceedings to amend
the General Plan Land Use Map of the properiy within the boundaries Tentative Parcel Map No.
33056 from Business Park and Limited Industrial to General Commercial; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for changes to the
approved General Plan Land Use Map; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Deparhnent
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on March 1, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed General Plan
Amendment No. 2004-02 prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council
approve the proposed amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map. The Planning
Commission finds and determines that the Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH NO.
2004111053) is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes the environmental effects of the proposed
project prior to City Council certification, based upon the following findings and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-02
have been made as follows:
1. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not be; a) detrimental to the health, safety,
comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of
the proposed amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the propeny or
improvemenrs in the neighborhood or within the Ciry.
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION FOR
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2004-02
Page 2 of 3
77~e jrropasal am~adrrent to tlae Ger~-al Plan Lan~' Use Plan l.v~s lx~n ana~jza~ r~latize to its parerural "uy
to l~ detrin~ntal to the laealth, safe[~ ~ort and z¢a'fare ~tlae persrnzs re~idi~ ar zeor,~i~ zeatbin the
n~i~ilx~rl~oal ~'tlae propase~a~reradrre~u 7he primzry zssue ider2ifial bystaJf mlat~ to the traffic a~rpacts g~'
the prvpasa~ projat arxl currarlatize projats zeixhira the "Stucty Ama" as dgcril~l in tlae Tra~'ic Stuay
pn~ar~l byAUxrt Grozer fr Associates. Staff,~ miaducla~ &zsal on the Traffu Study a~acl the natzgztirna
reluir~l that the Leta~ ~Seruce far the irnersa~tioris in tlae Study A ma zeould ~ Jx l~lazva L QS `D" as
a result ~thzs projax aml a~ararlcuize proja~s in tlae StudyA ma':
2. The proposed General Plan Amendment will pemut reasonable development of the area
consistent with its constrainu and will make the area more compatible with adjacent
properties.
71ae propasal a~rer~lyreru to the General PlanLarxl Use Plan has ade3uately analyzal the poternial i~iaus
~ the proj~t proposal as zarll as th~e cr~ra~lati2e projats zvxhin the Study Ama" aml has proposa~
rannvrerrdal iir~irnzerrents arnl nazigztions to tlae public right-g~w~s, tlaer~l~y allozeing the applicarn to
decelop the site zvth the pm[x~e~ shopping cerner. Conse~ently tlae anal~azs, alor~ zvx~i rratigzC'~rna zaill in
tum biing aJa~ut a site mm cwr~iat'rble zeith th~e adjacem praPeities lorata~ in tJae City arnl the CqrmCy ~
Rizersicle
3. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use density and usage more
in character with the subject propeny's location, access, and constrainu.
TGae propasal arrerxlrrerrt to tlae Ger~-al Plan Land Use Plan ~ld gtabdish a usage m~re in a~ornttrxe
~rith tlae traffrc iyr¢~acts assaiatal zaixh a d'r~»~t ~tbis type as zeell as currrelatize projats 7vithin the
`Study Ama': Additionall~ the pro[msa~ proja2 site ~zw~ld l~ in dase pm~i~r¢ty of ayry n~sary serucrs
rrarle~ bype~sons zeon'iingarnl shoppi~ zeithin tbe pmja~ pararr,eters.
4. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not have a significant effea on the
environment.
The propasai' am~ad~rerrt w the Ger,~ral Plan Layel Use Plan zuu i~~dal ~eixhara the dacription ~tlae
projaz's I~nrral Study a~xl subsa3ueia Draft Ercrirrntrrental I~act Report (SCH Na 2004111053) ayel
hAS l~z adequatelYPrepara l arxl anal~al Basal on tlae i~rnrmtion pmzida~ staff mnd~da~ tl.iat spftzf:c
ozenidin8 avnorr~ le~ soaa~ ta~ir~ogiral ar~h~er &~,efzts gFtlae prajsx aarttzeei~ tlae or~ (I) unazoidable
arrpact (air qualuy~ that ram~ l~ azoidxl arxl that ~aixh th~ ~arorrnrendxl yr¢tigztiors, the prv[~asal projat
z¢ill r~ lxtze a signifuar2 ~t on the enurarvrerr~
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve General Plan Amendment No. 2004-02.
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION FOR
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2004-02
Page 3 of 3
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on March 1, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER, UHLRY
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
bert A. Brady, Sec etary to the
lanning Commissi n
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-22
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF ZONE
CHANGE NO. 2004-02 CHANGING THE ZOIVING
DESIGNATION OF THE PROPERTY CONTAINED
WITHIN TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 33056
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(s) 377-120-007 & A PORTION OF
008 FROM M-i (LIMITED MANUFACTURING) TO C-2
(GENERAL COMMERCIAL) UNDER THE ZONING
ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, Glen Daigle, Daigle Development, LLC has initiated proceedings to change
the zoning designation of the subject property contained within Tentative Parcel Map No. 33056
from M-1 (Limited Manufacturing) to C-2 (General Commercial); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for changes to the
approved Zoning Map; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on March 1, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Zone Change No.
2004-02 prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed
amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map. The Planning Commission finds and determines
that the DraR Environmental Impact Report (SCH NO. 2004 1 1 1 05 3) is adequate and prepared in
accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which
analyzes the environmental effects of the proposed project prior to City Council certification,
based upon the following findings and determinations
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Zone Change No. 2004-02 have been
made as foilows:
1. The proposed Zone Change will not be; a) detrimental to the heakh, safety, comfort or
general welfare of the pexsons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed
amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvemenu in the
neighborhood or within the Ciry.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
ZONE CHANGE NO. 2004-02
Page 2 of 3
The propasal Zor,~ C~Znge has lx~z anal~al mlatzze to iu pa~ei2icd'uy to l~ ddri~reiual to tlae hPalth,
saf~ m~r~ort aml zeelfare ~ tlae persrna residirg or zeorizing zvthin tbe ~~ibmhad ~ the pro[xisal
anPreGrenx ?7ae jmymry issue iderni~ial by staff mlates to the traffic anPads ~'tlae prnpasa~ projat ayel
ama~/atize proj~s ~ezthin tlae "StudyAyea" as dgcri~l in tlae Traffic Study pn~iara l byAll~rt Grozer f~
Assaiatg. Staff, mredude~' &asa~ on tlae Traffu~ Study and tl~e natigztirna r~zriral that theLez~ ~
Serzice far tlae iyaersations in the Sta~dy A~ra zaill ~ l~ la~'oze~a L QS "D" as a r~ult of this prnja2 arul
~rulatize projaxs in th~e "St~dyA~ra':
2. The proposed Zone Change will perxnit reasonable development of the area consistent with
iu constrainu and will inake the area more compatible with adjacent properties.
Tl~ pmpasal Zon~ C~ia~e has ada~z~ata'y analyza~ tJaePatzrnzal z'rpacts ~the projat propasal as ~l as
tl~e a~~latize projs~s eeixhzn tl~e "Study Ama" arnl has propasal n~nvrera~ i~rg'nvzerrents a~el
narigxtirna to tlae public ri8ln-~zu~a~ rh~bY aUorzin8 the applifarn w derelop tl~e site ~airh tlae propase-l
shopping cerrter. Conseq~aeruly the anal~ais, alor~ zvxh yrangzt'wr~c zeill in turn biir~g a(a~ut a site mm
mrr~iatrble zeixh theadac~rn propertics lcratal in the C'uya~acl the Cora~uy ~Rizenide
3. The proposed Zone Cliange would establish a land use density and usage more in character
with the subject propert~s location, access, and constrainrs.
77ae propase~ Zor~ ~~e ze~ld establish a usage mne in arr famttyece zeith the traffic i~acts assaiatez'
zeith a dezelop~reiu ~this type as zeell as asrrzt(ati-ce projazs zvxhin tlae "Study Area': Additiona(ly, the
proposal projat site ze~ld lx in dcae praxinaty ~arry ~essary serzims ~a'a~ by persons zeor{zing and
shoppi~7aixhin the prnjat para~reten.
4. The proposed Zone Change will not ha~e a significant effect on the environment.
The pmpasal Zore d~a~ zaas im~udal zeixhin the description of th~e projat's Initial Sizuly arel subsapqerrc
Draft E~zzirnmrcrual I~r~iact Report (SCH Na 2004111053) ared has l~z ada~z~ately prepar~l ayel
anal~a~ Basa~ on the info»rurion prrn.rda~ stajf co~a~dal that sp~c ac~idin8 arorrrnr¢~ 1~ saia~
ra~odiral or arl~er l~re fus of tlae proj«t ~u~¢ei~i tlae orte (1) unazoidable i~r~aCt (air qHal'uy) tl~ai ramrar
l~ azoiclal aml tl.iat wtb the rttrnrvrerrd~l rrati~tions, the pm[~ase~ projat 7zill n~ haze a sigrr'zfirarn effat
on the enzirrnarrerrG
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake
Eisinore approve Zone Change No.2004-02.
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
ZONE CHANGE NO. 2004-02
' Page 3 of 3
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on March 1, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE,GONZALES,LARIMER,UHLRY
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
UHLRY
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
~2obert A. Brady, Secret~y to the
Planning Commission ~~
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-23
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 33056 FOR THE "OAK
GROVE CROSSING" SHOPPING CENTER TO BE
LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF COLLIER
AND CENTRAL AVENUES, ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(s)
377-120-007 & A PORTION OF 008.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Glen Daigle,
Daigle Development LLC, to request the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No.33056 for the
establishment of a retaiUcommercial shopping center; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of recommending approval of Tentative Parcel Maps for commercial
projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on Marchl, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for
Tentative Parcel Map No. 33056 and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds
and determines that this project is consistent with Secuon 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code (LEMG~, Seaion(s) 66424 and 66427 of the California Subdivision Map Act
(CSMA), and the Lake Elsinore Municipa] Code and determines that the Draft Environmental
Impact Report (SCH NO. 2004111053) is adequate and prepared in accordance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes the
environmental effects of the proposed project prior to City Council certification, based upon the
following findings and determinations.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with the Section(s) 66424 and 66427 of the California
Subdivision Map Act (CSMA) and Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Eisinore Municipal
Code (LEMC), the following findings for the approval of the tentative parcel map has been made
as follows:
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION FOR
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAI' NO. 33056
Page 2 of 3
FINDINGS - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is
consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the
objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan
(Government Code Section 66473.5).
The parcel map as designed assists in achieving the development of a well-balanced and
functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and
institutional land uses (GOAL 1.0, Land Use Element) by encouraging the development
of commercial land uses that strengthen the City's economic base and offer a range of
enterprises that serve the needs of the residents and visitors.
2. The effects this project is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the public
service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources
have been considered and balanced.
The City has considered the need for day-to-day shopping, which includes convenience
goods, food and personal services, in contrast to the impacts related to the project's
implementation and has determined that there are overriding considerations that
outweigh the one (1) unavoidable significant impact (air quality).
3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to
result in any significant environmental impact.
77ae projat has Iz~n ada3au~tely arred ~ition~l by all appli~tble depar~rrents ar,a' a~recia arnl zeilZ rrot the~eforz
rgult in any signifmaYu erzcirornrental irrg~acYS, eecept ore (1~ r~rrazoidable significaru irr~act (air qual ~uy)
tl~t rarmot l~ awidal to ~i tlae Cizy ~mrmer,els adoption ~ tJae "Stc~te~rent ~ Ocemdi's8
Corwcssidei-atiorns':
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COiTNCIL APPROVAL of a
Tentative Parce] Map No. 33056.
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION FOR
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 33056
Page 3 of 3
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on March 1, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER, UHLRY
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners
O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
A. Brady, Secretary~ the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-12 TO
ALLOW FOR THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF A
160,960 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL RETAIL CENTER
KNOWN AS OAK GROVE CROSSING LOCATED ON 14.43
NET ACRES ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S) 377-120-007 & A
PORTION OF 008.
WHEREAS, Glen Daigle, Daigle Development LLC has initiated proceedings to allow
for the design and development of a 160,960 square foot commercial retail center known as Oak
Grove Crossing located on 14.43 acres Assessar Parcel No. 377-120-007 & a portion of 008; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for Design Reviews; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on March 1, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered proposed Commercial Design
Review No. 2004-12 prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the
proposed Design Review. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Draft
Environmental Impact Report (SCH NO. 2004111053) is adequate and prepared in accordance
with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes the
environmental effects of the proposed project prior to City Council certification, based upon the
following findings and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Commercial Design Review No. 2004-
12 have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and
the Zoning District in which the project is located.
7?ae propasal Corr~rercial Design Reaezv lcraral ieixhin Assessar Pa~ml N~.~r~er 377-120-007 Fr 008
cmr~lie zeith tlae gazls a~acl abj~iuc ~'th~e Ger.~ral Pla~ in tl~at the apprnrul ~'t~iis mnvrercicil shopping
center ~erll assist in ad~ieiing tlae deceloprre~u gf a zea'l-(aalane~l a~zd firmional nax ~ residernia~
crnr~ercra~ imliast~ia~ operi spac~ r~ational arel instituc'wnal larnl uses, dize~s~ir~ Lake Elsiyrore's
a~rroir¢c Ease
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION FOR
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-12
Page 2 of 3
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
Tlae propasal Corrmprr'ral D~ign Retierv laratxl at Assgsar Parrel Nam'i~s 377-120-007 fr 008 is
appropiiate to tbe site a~xl surnxrr~g deceloprrents in that tlae slwpping cerner kyroze~z as the Qzk Cm~ze
Cmssinghas ~iz desigr~zl in wnsideratzon ~tlae size ared sl.~ape ~'tbe pmpe~t~ tlaereby cmating irnerest arnl
~nnrying zistus as a person ~roz~ along the stra~ Further the projat as propasa~ z¢ill crnrq~lerrent tJae R~uY
of eezsci~ dera'oprrent ared zeill cmate a-cis~ally pleasin~ rrortdecractize mlatiorGShip l~tzacen the ~noposal
a~acl eeisti~projaxs in tlxrx tlae ardntatural desigrg az~or arxl mztenals ared site daignprnposal eciderxe a
mmem.frn'qual~ul' a~rl ori8inalit~
3. Subjea to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to
result in any significant advexse environmental impacts.
Purs~aru to the Culifo»vu E ~zcirorrn~iTtal QNaI'uy Ad (CE QA), tlae jm~pasal Convrercial Desigz Reziezv
lorate~at AssessorParml Nurr~r377-120-007 ~ 008, as r~ierzaz'aml mrelitior.~l by all applirabde C'uy
Dieisions arxl Depan~rns arel A~erxzes, z¢ill ~rally ~ l~aee a sign'rf'uarn ~'at on tbe erzcirormeru
pursua~u to attad~el Cor,dizions ~Apjrruurl eecept that tlaere is or~ (1) unawidable sig~z'rficaru i~act (air
~~~ r~c ~~ ~ a~ w ~ r~ cuy Y~ ~~ ~r~ ~°sr~n ~o~~
~~~v
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with
the objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Purs~arn to Satwrc 17.82.070 (Action ~thePlarming CorraressionJ ~the Lake ElsinoreMan7icipal Ccde
(LEMCJ, the propasal Corrnreizial Design Rerierm lcratal at Assessar Para~ 1Vum~- 377-120-007
~ 008 l~as l~ sd~dr~l~el far mr~sideration and approurl ~the Planning Corm~vssiorc
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve Commercial Design Review No. 2004-12.
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on March 1, 2005 by the following vote:
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
PLANNING CONIMISION RESOLUTION FOR
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-]2
Page 3 of 3
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER, UHLRY
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
obert A. Brady, SecJ~ tary to the
Planning Commissiyln
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-25
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-38
FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A DRIVE THROUGH
ESTABLISHMENT PROPOSED ON PAD "B" OF THE
SHOPPING CENTER KNOWN AS OAK GROVE
CROSSING PARCEL 4 OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
NO. 33056 ASSESSOR PARCEL No(s) 377-120-007 & A
PORTION OF 008.
WHEREAS, Glen Daigle, Daigle Development LLC, has initiated proceedings to request
the approval of Conditional Use Pernut No. 2004-38 for the establishment of a drive through
establishment for Pad `B" of the shopping center known as the Oak Grove Crossings; and
WHEREAS, although the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated with the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Permits; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on March 1, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Pianning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Conditional Use
Permit 2004-38 prior to making a decision to for approval. The Planning Commission finds and
determines that the Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH NO. 2004 1 1 1 05 3) is adequate and
prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) which analyzes the environmental effects of the proposed project prior to City Council
certification, based upon the foilowing findings and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-38
have been made as follows:
1. The proposed use, on iu own merits and within the context of iu setting, is in accord with
the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site
is located.
In order to ad~iece a 7aa'l &zlarx~l arxl fir~adional ~~'r~idernza~ m»vre~r'~ i~ust~ia~ operz spac~
ramatzonal a~xl irc,titutiarcrl larxt uses, staff lacrs thoraar~ily eurl~atez'tlaelaYxl r~se cmr~atibilit~ yrois~ traffu
and arller erecironrrernal hazarz(s relatal to tlae proposal Cor~d'ztional Use Perrrat far tlae cbize-thrnu~i
establislm~rn lcratal at Asseuor Pa~ml Nurrl~rs 377-120-007 fr 008. Aarnzlingl~ the pmpasal laaxl
use zs in mrxa.arn~Ae zeith tlae c~5j~rziza ~'the Ger~rral Plan ared tlae purpose ~'tl~e plarrrring discrict in ~elnd~
the site is lcrataz'
PLANNING CAMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-38
Page 2 of 3
2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safery, comfort, or general
welfare of pe~ons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the
City, or injurious to properry or improvemenu in the neighborhood or the Ciry.
In aaord zaith the purposes ~the CY~apter 17.74 (Conditional Use Pemvts) ~the Lake Elsiyarre
Muraapal Ca(~ tJae City malizal that the propasaz' drize-tl~rnu~i gtabdishrr,eru lcrat«l at Assgsar Parcel
1Vu~rl~rs 377-120-007 fr 008 mry lauze a paremial to r~Ztizely irrg~act the zeelfare ~pe~srna msidir~g ar
zeorhing zeixlrin rlae r.~ighEnrhoal ar rhe Citgc Considering this, staff d.as subsrarniatxt rlxtt all applisable
Ciry Departrrerus a~xlA~rxia huze lz~n afforr~al tlae ~Ortitraty fora thorou~i r~ier~~the use aaxl haze
imrnporatal all applicab~e corrnre~us and/ar cor~ditwns relata~ to inctallation and rmimenance ~'
la~aclscapir~ stra~ d~'uaC~ior4s, regulatzons ~paints ~za'~i~lar ingress a~xl Egress a~ad arrmd ~potemial
musanees, so as to eli~nate arry ~ztize i~acts to the ~ral health, saf~1S mir~or5 ar ger~ral ~ceelfare ~
the su»a~e~xling r~i~ib~rhoal ar th~e Cit~c
3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for
all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required by
Title 17 of the LEMC.
Tlae jnro[xisaz'dri~thr~gh establzsJnrent loratalatAssasarParu~l Nu~r~r377-120-007 fs 008 has l~rz
d~sigreal in crnaide~-ation of th~e size ami sl~xpe ~ tlae prope~x~ themby strer~gtheni~ arnl enl.v~n¢ng the
invr~liate industrial a~ra. Further, tlae projat as ProP~~ '~ ~~~ ~~~J' ~~~~8
de~eloprreru aml zeill cmute a vsually plzcuizn~ yrortdenactize mlationship l~t~n the propasal aml eczsting
projats, in that the proposa~ uses haze l~z rezieieal to erisure ade~uateProvszon ~SC~Yizr~g from tlaePublu
righa-of-~zatty arad3'a<eru properties.
4. The site for the proposed use relates to streeu and highways with proper design both as to
width and type of pavement to carrythe type and quantityof traffic generated bythe subject
use.
Tbe pmposa~dri~thrw~gh establzshn~nt (tiratxl atAssgsorParz~ Nu»~n 377-120-007 & 008 has
l~rz reciececelas to iu n~ation to tlae zvidth and h7~ ~Pazerreru n~xlttl to rarry the ty[~e and quaYUUy ~
n"af~ic8er~ruta~ in that tlae City has ade~ately eurluatal tlaepaternial iyrg'iacts assaiatxl zeith tJaeprnpnsal
us~ prior to its ap[nvuzl amllxu mrel'uior,~l tlae projat to l~ serrttl by mzds ~'ade3Hare ~paciZy arel design
stamlarcLs to prozide rrasorwble aaess by ca , tr~rdz, transi~ arel bicyde
5. In approving the subject use located at Assessor Parcel Numbexs 377-120-007 &008 there
will be no adverse affect on abutting property or the pemutted and noxmal use thereof.
71ae propasal uselaas l~z thorou~ily reiieze~el aaad ~ional byall appli~rble C'uyDepart~rents and
a.usideA~ereaes, elinanating tJ~e pc~ernial far arzy and all adzene ~axs on tlae abirmnBPmP~
6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pwsuant to Section 17.74.50 of the LEMC have been
incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Permit to insure that the use
continues in a mamier envisioned bythese findings for the term of the use.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-38
Page 3 of 3
Pu~suarn to Sation 17.74.050 ~Actron of the Planrdng Cornrrlissior~ ~ the Lake ElsiYrore
Mamuzpal Cale (LEMCJ, the propasal driu~thras~i stabdzslmprtt lcrata~ at Assessar Panrl Nu~rr~is
377-120-007 fr 008 has l~z sd~alz~l~l for crnaideratzari a~zlapPmrul ~tbePlanning Crnrmzssion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-38.
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on March 1, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER, UHLRY
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
UHLRY
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
obert A. Brady, Secre ry to the
Planning Commissio
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-26
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 2004-OS FOR VARIOUS
SIGNAGE PROPOSED WITHIN THE SIGN PROGRAM
FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS THE OAK GROVE
CROSSING SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED ON 14.43
ACRES ASSESSOR PARCEL No(s) 377-120-007 & A
PORTION OF 008.
WHEREAS, Glen Daigle, Daigle Development LLC has initiated proceedings for the
approval of Variance No. 2004-OS for the Oak Grove Crossing; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of approving Variances; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on March 1, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Variance No.
2004-OS prior to approval. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Draft
Environmenta] Impact Report (SCH NO. 2004 1 1 1 053) is adequate and prepared in accordance
with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes the
environmental effects of the proposed project prior to City Council certification, based upon the
foilowing findings and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Variance No. 2004-OS has been made as
follows:
1. That adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.76.050 have been
incorporated into the approval of the Variance to insure development of the property in
accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the plaiu~uig district in
which the site is located;
Pursr~arn to Satio~z 17.76.050 (Action of the Planning Commissior~ ~ the Lake Elsinore
Muruapal Cale (LEMC), the propcsal zttriame grarni~ an q~f site fr~ry arientaz' pys'on sig~z arnl zebll
sign ~alndi eeca~ls the parapet lin~ ~Majar "A " builcling lcratxl at Assgsar Parm.' Nuar~s 377-120-
007 ~ 008 has 1x~nsd~alr~lEd frnmnsiderationarxl app~vzul ~thePlaranng Convrussion
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION FOR
VARIANCE NO. 2004-05
Page 2 of 3
of Lak
I hereb
meetin
2. That there are special circumstances, pursuant to the purpose of tlvs Chapter, applicable to
the subject property which do apply generally to other properties in the neighborhood, and,
therefore, granting of the Variance shall not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and district in which
the subjea property is located.
Thz City has mnrludal that th~e grarni~ ~'tJae uariarxe sJxrll ~ mr~stitzue a grarn ~spa~al PrizilEge
i~maisteru ~eith tlae linatations upon otlaer pro[~ertig in tlae zia~ si~ace it p~vzida ~sary f~ceezy traffic
icleruifiracirnz far rhe pmj~t k~aoza~z as Ck~k Groze C~nssing a7acl that the ra3ugt zeauld r~luce rhe mr~r~r ~'
signs pmpasaz' far Lro¢h tlae projat r~eren~ herein arxl in tlae am~
3. That in approving the Variance, any reductions authorized from the strict interpretation of
the Zoning Ordinance represenu the u~uiunum deviation from the Code necessary to fulfill
the purpose of this Chapter and enable reasonable development of the property.
Ingramingan gf sixe fra~zy orient~el sign on a py~'o~z sign al~y propasal far the "Horrp Depar" shoppi~
cerue, the Cizy has deterrranal t~u rhe ra3uat far a att~ ~eill represein tlae ~r¢ni~rnzdeuation from the
Cm'e ~sary to fulfrll the pur[~ase ~thzs Chapteraml enable musonable d~celoprrent ~'the pr~pert}~
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above fi ings, the Planning Commission of the City
e Elsinore DOES HEREBY approve Varian e N 2004-04
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
y certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
g thereof conducted on March 1, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER, UHLRY
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
Robert A. Brady, Secr~iEary to the
Planning Commissio~i
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-27
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM NO. 2004-09
FOR THE COMMERCIAL RETAIL CENTER KNOWN AS
OAK GROVE CROSSING LOCATED ON 14.43 ACRES
ASSESSOR PARCEL No(s) 377-120-007 & A PORTION OF
008.
WHEREAS, Glen Daigle, Daigle Development LLC has initiated proceedings for
Uniform Sign Program No. 2004-09; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of approving Sign Programs; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on March 1, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered proposed Sign Program 2004-
09 prior to making a decision for approval. The Planning Commission finds and determines that
the Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH NO. 2004 1 1 1 053) is adequate and prepared in
accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which
analyzes the environmental effects of the proposed project prior to City Council certification,
based upon the following findings and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Sign Program No. 2004-09 has been
made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan
and the Zoning District in which the project is located.
71ae propas~l Sign P~ram lcratal zaithin Assessor Pa~ Nu~r~rs 377-120-007 fs 008 crnr~lies
zvth tlae garls arad d~jaxiu3 ~'tlae Ger~,-al Pla~y ire tl~at th~ approml ~'tlris Corrflremral slx~ppir~g
Ceater Sign 1'rngram zeill assist in ad~iezi~ tlae derdopmm ~a ~eell-bzlarx~l arxl fumzional ~~
yesrderu~a~ mnvrenia~ amlirstria~ open spac~ ~reaxional arxl i~atitutional larel uses, dizersi~ing' Lake
Elsiyrore's aorroȢclaase
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all
other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
SIGN PROGRA114 NO. 2004-09
Page 2 of 3
Thz proposal Sign Program far the Crnrm~rc•ral Shopping Cerner larttal at Assessar Parm' Num~rs
377• 120-007 fr 008 is appropriate to tJae surr~aadi~ d~op~s in that tlae Sign 1'~g-am far tlae
Shopping Centerkrrozenas tlae Qzk C»aze Cmssinglxrs F~n desigr,~l in arasiderazion of tlae size arxl
shap~e gf the Prop'ei2~ ~' °aztin$ irnerest aml uarying vstas as a person ~zes along tlae stn~G
F~.crther tlae pmjat as p~ropasal zeill crnr~lerrerrt tlae qualuy of eeisting deceloprreru a~xl zeill crpiue a
vsually pleasi~ Yron-detraczize relatirnahip ~rc tJae propasal and eezsting projats in that the
ard~itatural desigrg a~or ared nruerials ami site desig~z propasa~ euderxe a crnxem far qual ~ity arnl
°n%tnalrt~t
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated
to result in anysignificant advexse environmental impacts.
Pursr~aY2 to the C'irlifrnnia E~zcirornrrntal Qual'zty Act (CE QA), the prapasaz' Sign Program far the
projat k~rvz as tlae Qak Grnce C~nssing lcrat~el at Assessor Parrd Nurri~s 377-120-007 fr 008,
as rerie~eal a~' arrtt~'~uion~l by all applirable Ciiy Divsiaa aml Departrr~ns aml A~rxies and zaill
ger~rally r~ hazea signifirarn effat on the eizciyanrrent purst~am to attada~el Cor~lizions ~'Apjrrarul
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guuantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance
with the objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursreaa~u to Sazzon 17.82.070 (Action ~tlae Planni~ ConvrassionJ ~thz Lake E Isia~ore M~l
Cale (LEMC), the pmpasal Sign Program for the Sbopping Cerrter lcratal at Ass~ssar Parcel
1V~.ryri~rs 377-120-007 ~ 008 lxrs l~z sdaaa'~lal far arraideratiore arul ctpprozul ~ tlae P/a~vri~
Corrar¢ssion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY approve Sign Program No. 2004-09.
Ron Lap'ere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on March 1, 2005 by the following vote:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
SIGN PROGRAM NO. 2004-09
Page 3 of 3
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE,GONZALES,LARIMER,UHLRY
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
I~obert A. Brady, Se~ktary to the
Planning Commiss~~n
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 28
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
NO. 2004-05, AMENDING THE DESIGNATION
FROM "LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDIENTIAL,
6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE" TO "TUSCANY
HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN," ON APPROXIMATELY
37.12+ ACRES LOCATED WEST OF GREENWALD
AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 3.12 MILES SOUTH
OF STATE AIGHWAY 74, EAST OF MARELLI
ROAD AND NORTH OF PONTE RUSSO, AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 349-390-
001 THRU -004, -015 AND -016.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by
Centex Homes to amend the General Plan designation on approximately 373+ acres of
unimproved property from "Low Medium Density Residential, 6 dwelling units per acre"
to "Tuscany Hills Specific Plan;" and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council
pertaining to proposed amendments; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item
on March 1, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION l. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed general
plan amendment, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Councii approve
the proposal to change the General Plan designation from "Low Medium Density
Residential" to "Tuscany Hills Specific Plan" on 373 + acres. Pursuant to Section 15063
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning Commission finds
and determines that the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for Amendment No. 1
to the Tuscany Hills Specific Plan No. 89-3 is adequate and prepared in accordance with
the requirements of CEQA which analyzes environmental effects of the proposed project.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 28
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2004-OS
MARCH 1, 2005
PAGE 2 OF 3
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the
City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of General
Plan Amendment No. 2004-OS have been made as follows:
The proposed amendment will not be (1) detrimental to the health, safety,
comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the
neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, (2) injurious to
property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City.
a. The existing designation of Low Medium Density Residential is similar to
the residential development proposed for the site in Amendment No. 1 to
the Tuscany Hills Specific Plan. Moreover, the proposal to develop the
site under the Specific Plan designation assures that the development
standards and design guidelines of the Specific Plan will be consistentiy
applied.
b. The proposed amendment will benefit people residing in this
neighborhood because, as members of the Toscano Heights homeowners'
association, they would have access and use of Association facilities.
2. The proposed amendment will be consistent with the latest General Plan.
a. The existing designation of Low Medium Density Residential is similar to
the residential development proposed for the site in Amendment No. 1 to
the Tuscany Hills Specific Plan. Therefore, there is little significant
change to the anticipated land use for the site.
b. The General Plan encourages cohesive development in the City, rather
than piecemeal or leapfrog residential development.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 28
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2004-OS
MARCH 1, 2005
PAGE 3 OF 3
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of
the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOM~~ that the City Council of the
City of Lake Elsinore approve General Plan Amendm nt 200~~
Ron LaPer~, Chairman '
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission
at a meeting thereof conducted on March 1, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER,
UIILRY
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
A. Brady, S~cretary tq~jfhe Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-29
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
APPROVAL OF ZONE CIIANGE NO. 2004-06, CHANGING THE
ZONING FROM L°Rl - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL" TO
"TUSCANY HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN," ON APPROXIMATELY
37.12+ ACRES LOCATED WEST OF GREENWALD AVENUE,
APPROXIMATELY 3.12 NIILES SOUTH OF STATE HIGHWAY
74, EAST OF MARELLI ROAD AND NORTH OF PONTE RUSSO,
AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 347-390-001 THRU
-004, -015, AND -016.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by
Centex Homes to change the zoning on approximately 37.12± acres of unimproved
property from "Rl - Single Family Residential" to "Tuscany Hilis Specific Plan;" and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council
pertaining to amendments; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item
on March 1, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed zone
change, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the
proposal to change the zoning from "Rl Single Family Residential" to "Tuscany Hills
Specific Plan." Pursuant to Section 15063, of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), the Planning Commission finds and determines that the Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report for Amendment No. 1 to the Tuscany Hills Specific Plan
No. 89-3 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirement of CEQA which
analyzes environmental effects of the proposed project.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-29
ZONE CHANGE NO. 2004-06
MARCH 1, 2005
PAGE 2 OF 3
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the
City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of Zone
Change No. 2004-06 have been made as follows:
1. The proposed amendment will not be (1) detrimental to the health, safety,
comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the
neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, (2) injurious to
property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City.
a. The existing zoning of R-1 Single Family Residential is similar to the
residential development proposed for the site in Amendment No. 1 to the
Tuscany Hills Specific Plan. Moreover, the proposal to develop the site
under the Specific Plan designation assures that the development standards
and design guidelines of the Specific Plan wil] be consistently applied.
b. The proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Tuscany Hills Specific Plan
provides development standards that protect the public healthy, safety and
general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhoods
in the area or within the City. The proposed project shall comply with
these standards.
c. The project site constitutes an island of existing Rl-Single Family
Residential zoning, within RR-Rural Residential properties to the west,
north and east. The inclusion of the site into the Tuscany Hills Specific
Plan assures a more cohesive residential development with adjacent
properties to the south.
2. The proposed amendment will be consistent with the latest General Plan.
a. The proposed zoning of "Tuscany Hills Specific Plan" is consistent with
the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2004-OS amending the
designation to "Tuscany Hills Specific Plan" being processed concurrently
with this zone change.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-29
ZONE CHANGE NO. 2004-06
MARCH 1, 2005
PAGE 3 OF 3
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of
the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the
City of Lake Elsinore approve Zone Change No. 20 6.
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission
at a meeting thereof conducted on March 1, 2005 by the foilowing vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER,
UHLRY
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
A.
to the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-30
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
TUSCANY HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 89-3,
LOCATED CONTIGUOUS TO THE WESTERN
BOUNDARY OF THE CANYON LAKE
COMMUNTTY, THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF
THE EXISTING TUSCANY HILLS COMMUNITY,
SOUTH OF GREENWALD AVENUE, AND EAST OF
UNDEVELOPED LAND WITHIN THE RAMSGATE
SPECIFIC PLAN (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 349-
280-017, -019, -021, -024 THRU -029, -034; 349-290-004,
-017 THRU -021; 349-390-001 THRU -004, -015 AND -
016).
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by
Centex Homes to amend the Tuscany Hills Specific Plan No. 89-3; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council
pertaining to changes to approved specific plans; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Pianning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public heazing held with respect to this item
on March 1, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed
Amendment No. 1 to the Tuscany Hills Specific Plan No. 89-3 prior to making a decision
to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed amendment. Pursuant to
Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning
Commission finds and determines that the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for
Amendment No. 1 to the Tuscany Hills specific Plan No. 89-3 is adequate and prepared
in accordance with the requirements of CEQA which analyzes environmental effects of
the proposed project.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-30
MARCH i, 2005
PAGE 2 OF 4
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and
Chapter 17.99 (Specific Plan District) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code the following
findings for the approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Tuscany Hills Specific Plan No. 89-
3 have been made as follows:
1. The location and design of the proposed development is consistent with
the goals and policies of the City's General Plan and with any other
applicable plan or policies adopted by the City, or in the process of being
prepared and adopted.
a. The General Plan supports the development of the Tuscany Hills
Specific Plan as a comprehensive and cohesive community. The
proposed Amendment has been reviewed and conditioned to enhance
and update the origina] Specific Plan.
b. The proposal has been designed to support the objectives of the Multi-
Species Habitat Conservation Plan recently adopted by the City, by
providing a 2,000 foot wide wildlife conidor within its boundaries that
link habitat to the north and southwest of the project site.
2. The proposed location allows the development to be well-integrated with or
adequately buffered from its sunoundings, whichever may be the case.
a. The proposed Amendment integrates the development of the northern
half of the Specific Plan with the southern existing community, by
extending vital roadways, by the provision of additiona] infrashucture
facilities and by maintaining the quality of architecture, landscaping
and monumentation in the area.
b. The proposed Amendment is buffered from the existing Canyon Lake
community with the provision of natural open space along its eastern
boundary.
a The proposed Amendment has incorporated a fuel modification zone
within its boundaries in order to buffer residences from the natural
open space provided on its western boundary.
3. All vehicular traffic generated by the development, either in phased
increments or at full build-out, is to be accommodated safely and without
causing undue congestion upon adjoining streets.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-30
MARCH 1, 2005
PAGE 3 OF 4
a. A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared for this project, which has
been conditioned to implement the recommendations set forth in the
Analysis.
b. Furthermore, the City's Traffic Engineer has required that additional
circulation measures be imposed upon the project.
a The Phasing Plan within Amendment No. 1 to the Tuscany Hills
Specific Plan has been reviewed and conditioned to provide access to
construction vehicles and future residents from State Highway 74 and
Greenwald Avenue.
4. The Final Specific Plan shall identify a methodology to allow land uses to be
adequately serviced by existing or proposed public facilities and services.
a. The proposed Amendment has been review and conditioned to provide
adequate public services to the site.
b. The proposed Amendment provides a neighborhood park, a
community park and a recreationa] facility For its residents.
5. The overall design of the Specific Plan shall produce an attractive, efficient
and stable development.
a. The proposed Amendment will allow the construction of compatible
residential units in a design that promotes neighborhood identity.
b. The proposed Amendment will provide recreational amenities and
natural open space for its residents, while eliminating commercial uses
from the residential community.
6. In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), impacts have been reduced to a level of non-significance, or in
the case where impacts remain, a statement of overriding considerations is
recommended for adoption to justify the merits of project implementation.
a. The Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report identified several
significant environmental effects resulting from implementation of the
project. Most ofthese significant effects can be fully
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-30
MARCH 1, 2005
PAGE 4 OF 4
avoided/mitigated through the adoption of feasible mitigation
measures.
b. Two environmental effects cannot be reduced to less than significant
levels by the adoption of feasible mitigation measures or feasible
environmentally superior alternatives.
a Short and long-term impacts to air quality and transportation, and
traffic impacts at one intersection have been identified as unavoidable
and significant, and require a Statement of Overriding Considerations.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of
the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the
City of Lake Elsinore approve Amendment No. 1 to the Tuscany Hills Specific Plan No.
89-3.
Ron LaPere, Commissioner
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at
a meeting thereof conducted on March 1, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER,
UHLRY
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
R ert A. Brady, Secret to the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 31
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31370, A
SUBDIVISION OF 807 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND THREE
PARKS, AND 61 OPEN SPACE LOTS, ON APPROXIMATELY
368.4+ ACRES LOCATED CONTIGUOUS TO THE WESTERN
BOUNDARY OF THE CANYON LAKE COMMUNITY, THE
NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE EXISTING TUSCANY HILLS
COMMUNITY, SOUTH OF GREENWALD AVENUE, AND EAST
OF UNDEVELOPED LAND WITHIN THE RAMSGATE SPECIFIC
PLAN, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 349-280-017,
-019, -021, -024 THRU -029, -034; 347-290-004, -017 THRU -021; 349-
390-001 THRU -004, -015 AND -016.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by
Centex Homes to divide approximately 368.4+ acres of unimproved property into 807
residential lots, three parks and 61 open space lots; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council
pertaining to the subdivision of land; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item
on March 1, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed general
plan amendment, zone change, specific pian amendment and subdivision, prior to making
a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the proposal to subdivide
approximately 368.4 + acres into 807 residential lots, three parks, and 61 open space
lots. Pursuant to Section 15063, of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
the Planning Commission finds and determines that the Subsequent Environmental
Impact Report for the project is adequate and prepared in accordance with the
requirements of CEQA which analyzes environmental effects of the proposed project.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 31
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31370
MARCH 1, 2005
PAGE 2 OF 4
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State of California Subdivision Map Act,
and the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of
Tentative Tract Map No. 31370 have been made as follows:
The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and
improvements, is consistent with the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. The
proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses
and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5).
a. The design of the proposed subdivision and density of 2.19 dwelling units
per acre are consistent with the Tuscany Hills Specific Plan, and therefore
with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision reduces the number of
dwelling units originaliy proposed for this area from 906 dwelling units to
807. Thusly, the density is reduced from 2.61 dwelling units per acre
which was originally approved.
b. The project proposes single family residential lots ranging in size from
5,000 square feet to 24,100 square feet, with an average lot size of 8,131
square feet. The minimum lot size originally approved in the Specific Plan
call for 4,000 square feet in the south portion, and 5,000 square feet in the
north portion. The proposed map meets this minimum.
2. The site of the proposed division of land is physically suitable for the proposed
density of development in accordance with the General Plan.
a. The overall density proposed by this project is consistent with the
originally approved Specific Plan.
b. The map provides open space areas that protect the natural topography and
views.
The effects that this project is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region,
the public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and
environmental resources have been considered and balanced.
a. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan. During the approval
of City's General Plan, housing needs, public services and fiscal resources
were scrutinized to achieve a balance within the City.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 31
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31370
MARCH i, 2005
PAGE 3 OF 4
b. The map has been conditioned to annex into Community Facilities District
2003-1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public
safety operations and maintenance issues in the City.
c. The map has been conditioned to annex into Lighting and Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of
the project on public right-of-way landscaped areas to be maintained by
the City, and for street lights in the public right-of-way for which the City
will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California
Edison.
4. The proposed division requires the adoption of a Statement of Overriding
Considerations pursuant to Califomia Environmental Quality Act compliance.
The Planning Commission recommends the adoption of the Statement prepared
for this project.
5. The design of the proposed division of land or type of improvements are not
likely to cause serious public health problems.
a. Tentative Tract Map No. 31370 is conditioned to comply with all
development standards of Amendment No. 1 to the Tuscany Hills Specific
Plan. These standards have been reviewed and recommended for approval
to benefit the public health, safety and welfare.
6. The design of the proposed division of land or the type of improvements will not
conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use
of property within the proposed division of land.
a. Al] known easements or requests for access have been incorporated into
Tentative Tract Map No. 31370.
b. The map has been circulated to City departments and outside agencies,
and appropriate conditions of approval have been applied for their
approval during conshuction.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of
the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the
City of Lake Elsinore approve Tentative Tract Map No. 31370.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-31
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31792
SEPTEMBER 7, 2004
PAGE 4 OF 4
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission
at a meeting thereof conducted on March 1, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
A.
LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER,
LJHLRY
O'NEAL
the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-32
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CERTIFICATION OF THE
FINAL SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2004-
O5, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2004-06, AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
TAE TUSCANY HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 89-3, AND
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31370.
WHEREAS, Centex Homes has submitted applications for General Plan Amendment No.
2004-05, Zone Change No. 2004-06, Amendment No. 1 to the Tuscany Hills Specific Plan No.
89-3, and Tentative Tract Map No. 31370. The project consists of the development of 368.4+
acres into 807 single family residentiai lots, a neighborhood and a community park, a
recreational facility, and approximately 130 acres of natural open space. The project site is
located on the northeastern edge of the City of Lake Elsinore, south of Greenwald Avenue, north
of the existing Tuscany Hills community, west of the Canyon Lake community, and east of
undeveloped property within the Ramsgate Specific Plan and Bureau of Land Management;
WHEREAS, these applications together comprise the "project" as defined by Section
21065 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Cal. Public Resources Code
§ 21000 et seq. A project is defined as an activity which may cause either a direct physical
change in the environment, or a reasonabiy foreseeable indirect physical change in the
environment and which includes the issuance to a person of a lease, permit, license, certificate,
or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies;
WHEREAS, the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the project has been
prepared to evaluate environmental impacts resulting with the project;
WHEREAS, Section 21081.6 of CEQA requires that where an EIR has been prepared for
a project for which mitigation measures are adopted, that a mitigation monitoring or reporting
program be adopted for said project, and pursuant to Section 21081.6 of CEQA, the City has
prepared and updated a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for certifying Subsequent
Environmental Impact Reports;
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-32
MARCH 1, 2005
PAGE NO. 2
WHEREAS, public notice of said applications has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at public hearings held with respect to this item on March 1, 2005 ;
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines,
prepuation of the Final Subsequent Environmenta] Impact Report for the project was selected as
the most appropriate document for compliance with CEQA, utilizing criteria set forth therein;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
1. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the Final Subsequent EIR for
Amendment No. 1 to the Tuscany Hills Specific Plan and associated discretionary approvals
and finds that it is complete, adequate in its evaluation of all environmental effects of the
proposal, contains all required information, and has been completed in compliance with
CEQA and the City's CEQA requirements.
2. Amendment No. 1 to the Tuscany Hills Specific Plan and associated discretionary approvals
will result in significant unavoidable air quality and transportation and traffic impacts
regardless of mitigation measures. A Statement of Overriding Considerations has been
prepared in accordance with Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines. The Statement of
Overriding Considerations "balances" the proposed project against its unavoidable
environmental effects.
3. The Subsequent EIR, which was prepared in accordance with Section 15163 of the State
CEQA Guidelines, includes the Draft SEIR, Response to Comments document, Mitigation
Monitoring Program, Statement of Findings and Facts, and Statement of Overriding
Considerations.
4. The Subsequent EIR identified several significant environmental effects resulting from
implementation of the project. Some of these significant effects can be fully
avoided/mitigated through the adoption of feasible mitigation measures. To the extent that
these findings conclude that various proposed mitigation measures ouflined in the Final SEIR
are feasible and have not been modified, superseded, or withdrawn, the City hereby binds
itself to implement these measures. These findings are not merely informational, but rather
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-32
MARCH 1, 2005
PAGE NO. 3
constitute a binding set of obligations that will come into effect when the City Counci]
formally approves the project.
5. The mitigation measures and/or the standard design features and construction measures are
referenced in the Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
(MMRP) adopted concurrently with these findings, and will be implemented through the
final design, construction and post-construction periods.
6. Two environmental effects cannot be reduced to less than significant levels by the adoption
of feasible mitigation measures or feasible environmentally superior alternatives. Short and
long-term impacts to air quality and transportation and traffic impacts at one intersection
have been identified as unavoidable and significant. The project has the potential to adversely
affect humans, either directly or indirectly.
7. The Planning Commission considered the information contained in the FSEIR prior to
recommending to the City Council certification of the FSEIR; and the FSEIR reflects the
Planning Commission's independent judgment and analysis. In recommending approval, the
Planning Commission has weighed the benefits of the project against the significant adverse
impacts identified in the FSEIR that have not been avoided or lessened through mitigation to
a level of less than significant. The Planning Commission hereby determines that benefits of
the project outweigh the unmitigated adverse impacts and that the project should be
approved.
8. The Pianning Commission finds that to the extent that the identified significant or potentially
significant adverse impacts have not been avoided or substantially lessened, there are specific
economic, legal, social, technological and other considerations which support approval of the
project. The project would provide the following benefits which offset the identified
significant short and long-term air quality and intersection impacts:
a. Social
(1) To provide housing for the City of Lake Elsinore's growing population consistent
with the City's General Plan.
(2) Dedicate a 5-acre park with two regulation Little League fields to the City of Lake
Elsinore.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-32
MARCH 1, 2005
PAGE NO. 4
b. Economic
(1) Construction of the project will generate its fair share of property taac revenues to
Riverside County annually. Construction of the project will also generate utility
user tax revenues to the City and County.
(2) The project will be built out by early 2011, providing steady conshuction jobs
over the construction period.
(3) The project will contribute fees toward school facilities, park facilities, fire
services, police services, water facilities, and sewer facilities.
(4) The project applicant will contribute a fee in lieu of providing 15% of the units as
affordable housing in accordance with
Section 33413(b)(2) of the California Community Redevelopment Law.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore certify the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for Amendment No. 1 to the
Tuscany Hills Specific Plan and its associated discretionary approvals as complete, adequate, and
fully complies with the requirements of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's
environmental analysis procedures.
Ron LaP81re, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-32
MARCH 1, 2005
PAGE NO. 5
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Pianning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on Mazch 1, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER, UHLRY
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-33
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF A PORTION
OF 312D STREET IN FAVOR OF ELSINORE VALLEY
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A WATER AND SEWER PUMP
STATION.
WHEREAS, Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District has approached the City in an
effort to acquire right-of-way for the construction and operation of a water and sewer pump
station; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for consistency with the
General Plan Circulation Element; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on March 1, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered proposed vacation of a portion
of 3Td Street prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the
proposed Street Vacation. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the
proposed Street Vacation conforms to the intent and requirements of the General Plan
Circulation Element;
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve a roadway vacation for the portion of 3`d Street approximately 322-feet in
length and 60-feet in width in favor of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District for the
construction and operation of a water and sewer pump station.
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION FOR
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2003-13
Page 2 of 2
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on March 1, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER, UHLRY
O'NEAL
ATTEST:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-34
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOC'.ATED AT 1311 PARK WAY,
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 373-194-001.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Kurt Szalonek,
requesting Minor Design Review of a Single-FamilyResidence;
WI IEREAS, the Plamiuig Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving a Minor Design Review for Single Family Residences; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plamvng Conm~ission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Deparunent and other
interested parties at a public heariug held with respect to this item on March 1, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Plauuuig Cominission of the City of I.ake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plazuiing Corcunission has considered the proposed request for a Minor
Design Review for a Single Family Residence and has found it acceptable. The Plam~uig
Coirunission finds and detexxnines that this project is consistent with Chapter 17.23 ("R 1) of the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and that this action is exempt from the requiremenu of the California
Environmental QualityAct (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303;
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The prapasa~ Mirror Design Rerzerv lcratxl at 1311 Park Way m»~plies zeith the gazls and ahj'a2ius ~ the
Ger~ral Pla~y in that tlae app~vu~l ~this si~fanaly residerxe zeill assist in adnezing tlae der~Op»pnt ~a e¢ell-
&alar.e~l a~xl fzaxzional ~rax ~residernu~ crnmrenia~ arxlustr~ opaz spac~ r~r~aCrorzrl a~a' irstit~.rtional land
use as zeell as ererouraging tl~e der~rrent arnl rmirnena~ace ~a brazcl ran~e ~h~szn8 ~'1Pg }~ar all inenrr,e
g~rn~ps arxl abe ratEgories.
Z. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
7lae p%oasa~ Miyror Dgign Reaera~ lcrat~el at 1311 Park Way is appiropiiate w tlae site arxl surn~.axling
deceloprre~us in that tlae si~e farraly ho~re Txts l~z designe~l in miaideration ~ the size and sl.v~pe ~ tJae
I~P~J3 tl~en'b1' cmatin% irnerESt a~acl zurying zistus as a penon ~az~ alor~g tlae stra~ Furtl.~- the projaz as
p~v[~asal ~vill o~lerreru th~e qr~al~uY ~~cisting deceloprreiu arel ~eill crrate a u's~ally plPasi~ rron-c%~-actize
relatio~ahip ~ the jnvpasa~ arel eeisting proj«ts in tlxrz tlae a~diitatural desigry mlor arxl rrttterials
propasa~ eecr~ls tlae size arnl desi~ ~tlae ho»es in tbenmzurrxlingamu
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-34
PAGE NO. 2
3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guaxazrtees and evidence of
compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to
insure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and the
plannuig district in which the site is located.
Purszutrn to Satio~z 17.82.100 (Mirror Design Reueu~ g~'tlae Lake Elsi~zore Mumcipal Ccde (LEMC), tlae
pmpasalMiyrorDesigzReiierv(cratal at 1311 Park LY/aylxu lx~re sd~alHlal aml mnsider~el farapprouxl by the
Planning Corr~r¢ssion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plazuiuig Comnvssion of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE of th~or Dp.~i~ Review for a Single-Family
Residence located at 1311 Pazk Way. ,~~ ~
Lake Elsinore Planning Coi7uivssion
I herebycertifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Plannuig Coimivssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on March 1, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Conunissioners: LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER, UI II.RY
NOES: Counnissioners:
ABSEN`I': Coi7uivssionexs: O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Coimnissioners
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-35
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING VARIANCE 2005-01 FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 1311 PARK WAY, ASSESSOR PARCEL
NUMBER 373-194 00 1.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Kurt Szalonek,
to request a Variance No. 2005-Oi for the reduction of the side yard setback pursuant to Section
17.23.080(B)(1), Side Yard Setbacks, of the LEMC, from 12 feet to 5 feet for a single family
residence to be located at 1311 Park Way;
WHEREAS, the Plannuig Coiruivssion of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Variances for the requiremenu of the Zoning Code; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plaiuiing Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on March 1, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Plamiing Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Pluu~iiig Cominission has considered the proposed request for Variance
No. 2005-01 and has found it acceptable. The Plannuig Coma~ission finds and determines this
project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and that this action is exempt from the
requiremenu of the California Environmental QualityAct (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.76 (Variance) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
71ae projxisaz' Variame loratal at 1311 Parh Way a»r~lics ~eith tlae ~xZals ayxl d~jati-cFS ~the Gerxral Pla~y in
that the approzul of this ~lirction in side 7arrl setbzdz zeill asszst in aclnezir,g the d~nt ~'a ~e~'l-&alarec~el
arnl fiaxt'rorwl ~~resic(emia~ mrivrerria~ i~aclustria~ ope~z spac~ ~mational a~xl iaatizutional (craad uses as
zaell as erxrnsraging tlae d~a'op»rnt ared mairnznanee ~'a brcad rar~e ~h~ssra~g types }~ar all immre gra~s ayel
a~e cazEgaries. Further, ada~r~ate romfitirna arxl safcguarzls pursr~arn to Satian 17.76.050 ~'th~ Lake Elsirrore
M~micipal Ccde (LEMCJ, haze l~z inerrrparatal in tlae approuzl ~tlae uaria~ to insure derelopm~¢ ~tlae
property in aavrd zvt6i tbe d~jaxiza g{'the Gen~-al Plan arnl tlaepurpase ~tl,~p/anning district in ~eliid~ the site
is lorate~ Approurl ~the Variame zvll allora~reusonablz decelopm~rt g~tlae prajaz to l~ built in aarordarze
~aith ulti~rtttz str~t d~e(iration and riglit-~zetty re~uirerrpnts ~the Ger~ral Plan Cirz~lation Ele~rer2 arxl still
rrairuain dec~oprrern crnaisterzy zaith ~r ~idential dzaelli~s in tJae z~rmt~liate ar~a.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 35
PAGE NO. 2
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
71ae pmpnsal Variarx~ Icratez' at 1311 Pa~lz Way is appropriate to tl~e site arxl s~srror~xli~ ~ in
that tlae pro[xis~l si~le farrvly horre has !~z desigr~l in mresidei-ation ~the size a~xl sl~ape 9F ~ P~P'~T)s
tl~ereby cmating iruerest a~ad zttrying vstas as a person nvzes alaig tlae str~t In additiory tlaeprnjat as propasal
zarll crnr~lerrent the qual ~u1' ~eezsting d~'Opmmt arnl zezll c~rate a vsz~ally pleasing ~rdetractize rrlatirnahip
~ze~ri the proposal a~xl existing projaxs in thar tlae ard~~u«tural designs, mlais ayrl rmterrals prop~al etic~l
thesize and desigri ~tlae hon~ in thesurnxrr~ga~.
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in anysignificant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuant to the Califorraa Erecironrrernal Qual'uyAd (CEQAJ, the proposez' Trariarxe lcrattel at 1311 Park
W/a}s as yeciececel arxl a»~ditior,~zl by all applirable City Dizisionc arxl De[~artrrerns u~xl Agerx'rs, zeill rrot lxaze
a signifuarn ~'az on the erccirvrrrren[ in that tlae arza in zaliid~ tlae projaz is lcratal is ~ deterrr¢n~l to l~
erzcirunm~rtally serrsitize purs~ant to Anzde 19 (Categorical Exemplrons) arnl S~ion 15303 (New
Constructron arConversion ofSmall SlructuresJ.
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
gi.iarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incoxporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuarn to S~rCirnz 17.82.070 (Actiorc ~'tlae Pla~ari~ Co~mrassion) ~tlae Lake Elsiyrore Muraapal Cale
(LEMC), the propasal Variame has l~i sdaEdylal for crnaide~-atirnz and ap,brozul by the Planni~
C~rnrma'ssion In additiory s[raial amnratam~, pursuaYU to tlae pu~pase ~ C~iapter 17.76 (Varianees),
appli~ble w the s~bjat pmperty ~rl~id~ do rrot apply ger~rally w~ber pro~tzes in tlae r,~i~il~rhar~ a~
th~ore graming ~'this utriarxe shall r~ cmatitute a grar2 ~a sp~xal Pn'crle~e irKmaistem zeith the linatatio~a
uporz ad~er propertze in tJae vayrizy and dzscrict in ~celiid~ tlae subja2 prope~zy is la~uta~ Further, appmzing the
uariarxe fromth~ st~zcz imerpretation gFtlae Zorri~ Ordaname reprtser2s a ~r¢rror deciution fram the Zoning Cale
~essary to fulfill tl~ purpase ~thzs C~iaptera~ad enala~e masonable deielopnem ~thePropert~C
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planuing Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Variance No. 2005-01.
U J~
Ron ere, Ckiauman
Lake Elsinore Plamiuig Conmvssion
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 35
PAGE NO. 2
I herebycertifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Plann~ a Conuivssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on March 1, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Conuiiissioners: LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER, UI-ILRY
NOES: Comnvssioners:
ABSENT: Comnvssionets: O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-36
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
DESIGN REVIEW FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. 2004-
05, TO BE LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF COLLIER AVENLTE AND CIIANEY STREET- APN
377-151-063
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Studio 7
Architecture, to request a Design Review of Industrial Project No. 2004-05 for a single-level
industrial building totaling 20,013 square feet on 1.56 acres of vacant land;
WHEREAS, the Platuiuig Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Design Review for industrial projecu; and
Wf IEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plamung Conunission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Deparunent and other
interested parties at a public meeting held with respect to this item on March 1, 2005;
NOW TF3EREFORE, the Plamiuig Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECI'ION 1. The Plannuig Coinmission has considered the proposed request for the
Industrial Project No. 2004-05 and has found it acceptable. The Plamiuig Conunission finds and
detemunes this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and that this action is
exempt from the requiremenu of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to
Section 15332.b., Ir~Fill Deceloprrern P~vjazs;
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will complywith the goaLs and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
7%ae jm~[msallrrlystrial DesignRetietv~loratal atAPN.• 377-151-063 cwr~ilies ~ceith thegazLs ayxl objstizes ~
tlae Ger~ral Pla~y in that the ap[nvrul g~'this mrrorenial yraraafacturi~ cmr~[ex zrill asszst in ad~ieci~ tlae
d~elopm~rt ~a zeell-bzlane~l arel fzs~xt ~ional rr¢x ~r~iderrtia~ a~»vren~ i~lust~ia~ o[~az spac~ ~reat'~onal
a~xl i~atitzrtional la~xl uses as ~ceell as emouraging ina'iutrial laral ~ses to dizersify Lake Elsirrore's anrrorr¢c &ue
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Muxucipal Code.
The jm~pasal Indushial Desig~z Retietv loratxl at APN: 377•I51-063 zs appro[rriate to the site ar,d
sunoiuuli~ dec~p»ena in that th~e prajxis~el mrrarercial rrarwfacturi~ m~r~iler has lz~n dgigr,~el in
mrsideration ~the size and shape ~thePml~~ ~' ~~8 imerest arxl uaryirrg vstus as a person ~
along tlae stra~ Further tl~e projst as ~ez' z¢ill mrr~lerreru the q~ality ~eeisting derelopr~rn ayxl zrill
cmate a zisr~ally pleasir~ yron-detracriee yelationship ~rz tlae ~ose~ a~xl exzsting projats in tbzt the
ardrizatural desigr~ cr~orand material and site desigres proposal ezidencea mrxem forqual'uyarnl orig'enal~it~
RESOLUI'ION NO. 2005-36
PAGE NO. 2
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to resuk
in anysignificant advexse environmental impacu.
PunHarntotJaerirlifornraE~zrzrtmm~ualQHal'uyAct(CEQA), tlaepropasallndz~st~ialDesignReverr~lcrata~l
at APN.• 377-I51-063, as reuereErl a~xl mrsa'irior,~l by all applicala~e City Dizisirna a~acl De~iart~rents arul
A~erxzes, zzill yeot lxaze a sigr¢fuarn ~at on th~e eizcironmryrt pursuarn to AYtide 19 (Categorical
Exemptions) and Saziorc 15332 (In-Fill Development Pmjects).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guazantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure developxnent of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuarn to Sazzon 17.82.070 (Actio~z ~the Plamzing CormiassionJ ~the Lake Elsirrore Municipal Cale
(LEMCJ, tlae propasal IYdustrial Desig~z Retieu~ lorata~ at 377-I51-063 lxrs (~rt sdaa(r~l~l far mraideration
arxl a[~rozul by tlae Planning Corr~assion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Comnvssion of the City
of Lake ELsinore DOES HEREBY RECOM1vIEND TO THE QTY COUNQL APPROVAL of
Design Review for Industrial Project No. 2004-05.
Ron LaPere, Chairn~au
Lake Elsinore Pluming Coimivssion
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plamiuig Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on March 1, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Conunissionexs: LAI'ERE, GONZALES, LARIMER, LTI~.RY
NOES: Conunissioners:
ABSEN'I': Conunissioners: LJHI,RY
ABSTAIN: Couunissioners:
ATTFCT•
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-37
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF
FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH SECTION 6.1.2 OF
THE MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION
PLAN (MSHCP) FOR THE PROJCT KNOWN AS
INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. I 2004-06 TO BE LOCATED
ON PASADENA STREET AND CENTRAL AVENUE - APN
377-140-019
WHEREAS, a site specific focused survey (Habitat Assessment Letter Report) for Narrow
Endemic Plan Species was required by Secuon 6.1.2 of the Muluple Species Habitat Conservadon
Plan (MSHQ') for the purpose of developing a five (5) building industrial complex and associated
improvemenu; and
WHEREAS, the Ciry of Lake Elsinore evaluated the consistency of the project with
the MSHQ'; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plam~uig Comnvssion
has considered evidence presented by the Communiry Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on March 15, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Plamiuig Cominission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of makuig recommendation to the City Council adopting the Findings of
Consistencywith the MSHQ'; and
NOW THEREFORE, the Plamung Conm~ission of the City of Lake ELsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
The Habitat Assessment Letter Report prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. has been prepared,
submitted and reviewed in accordance with requiremenu of the Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHQ'). The repor[ is complete and adequate in it's evaluation of all
environmental effects of the project known as Industrial Project No. I 2004-06 and will not
preclude the implementation of the MSHCP goals, based on the following finding:
FINDINGS - MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN
1. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species
Guidelines.
Aczrncling to the Multiple Sp~rzes Habixat Crnaerrution Plan (MSHCP), "Within ide~uifia~ Narroze~Eyelerr¢c
Plant Spa~s surrey amas (NEPSSAJ, sit~spaific faz~sa~ sune~s for Narroze~E~lerrac Plaru Spazes sJxrll lx
~zri~l for all pul~ic a~xl priuue projats zal,~e~z appropriate habirat zs preser2 " Sime tlae Habitat Sxri#abiliry
Assessrreru Letter Repart datal Marrh 2, 2005 fceael rro appropriate l.abitat far Narnnv E~xlerrac Plant
Spaies future faus studie are Yro2 ~uirc~
RESOLLTTION No. 2005- 37MARCH 15, 2005
Page 2 of 2
NOW, TI IEREFORE, based on the above Finding, the Plam~uig Coininission of the Ciry of
Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMIv1END that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore
adopt the Finding of Consistency with Section 6.1.2. of the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation
Plan.
Q,tnJ
Ron LaPe , ChauYnan
Lake Elsinore Planning Coiiunission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plazmuig Cominission at a meeting
thereof conducted on March 15, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Conunissioners: LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Comnvssioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: O'NEAL, UHLRY
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
Comnvssion
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-38
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORrTIA,
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-40
FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT
NO. I 2004-06, TO BE LOCATED ON PASADENA STREET
AND CENTRAL AVENUE - APN 377-140-019.
WF3EREAS, an application has been filed with the City of I,ake Elsinore by Carl Johnson of
Triple J Development to request approval of Conditional Use Pernut No. 2004-40 for outdoor
storage for Industrial Project No. I 2004-06; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Conuivssion
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on March 15, 2005 and
WHEREAS, the Plamiuig Coiimiission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Pemuu.
NOW T~IEREFORE, the Plannuig Cominission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SEG"TION 1. The Plannuig Couuivssion has considered the request for approval of
Conditional Use Pernut No. 2004-40 for outdoor storage for Industrial Project No. I 2004-06. The
Planning Couuivssion finds and determines this projea is consistent with the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2002-03 has been prepared pwsuant to Seaion
15070 of the California Environmental QualiryAct (CEQA).
SECI'ION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permit) of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of iu setting, is in accord with the
objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the pluuiuzg district in which the site is
located.
In orzler to ad~iece a 7aell Ealarx~l arnl fismt'wnal ~~ residermir~ crnrmz~ia~ i~trra~ op~z spuc~
mreational arnl instucrtional la~xl uses, staff laas thorzws~ily ewlyatal tJae larxl use ~tibilit~s nars~ traffua~xl
otl~- azcironrrernal l~azarzls r~late~'to t!~ propasal Comfitiorul Use Pemdt for outdcorstorabe Icratal at APN
377-140-019. Acmr~lirgl~ tlae propcKal lared use zs in arrxz~rrenee zeith tlae objaxizes ~'tlae Ger.~ral Plan ar~l
tJae purpase ~the plarming district in zahid~ tl~ site lcrata~
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-38
MARCH 15, 2005
Page 2 of 3
2. That the proposed use will not be denimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general
welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City,
or injurious to property or improvemenu in the neighborhood of the Ciry.
In aaord zaith the puipases gFtlae Clzzpter 17.74 (Corx(~izional Use Pernats) ~'tlae Lake Elsiyrore Muni¢pal
Cal~ the City malizaz' that tlae propassl a.udarr stora~e use loratxl at APN 377-140-019 mry lxcze a
parzrnzal to ~gztizely i~rq'iad tlae zeelf ~are ~'persor6 r~iding ar zeorking -caixhin th~e reighlxrn'~axl ar the Cit~c
Crnaidering this, staff has substarniata~ tlxst all applirable Czty Departrrerus ared A~ncis l~a-ce Ix~n affordal
the opporaanty far a thomu~i reLierm~'the use arnllxtie i~rporatal all appli~e mrror.e~us arad/ar ~
relatal to instaUatiora arxl mzintenanee ~landscapzr~ sC~t da~'uatiwa, rEgulatirns ~Poarns gf'ze~iicr~lar i~ress
arxl Egress a~acl mrnrd ~par,~ial mrisames, so as to eli~te any re~ztize i~ads to tlae ~er~i-al hazlth, safet,~
cwr~rn5 or~ral zeelfa>e ~th~e surr~rredi~ ~ghla~rr'~aal ar th~e Cit~
3. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for
all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffexs and other features required by Title
ll of the LEMC
7he proposal outdaor starage use la~ata~ at APN 377-140•019 has lx~rc desigrxzl in mr~sicleration ~the size
arxl shape ~theProPe~x~ ~a~bY St~e~th~emn8 a~ad enlaaming the i~mrez'iate imlz~sty7crl ar~u. Furtlaer, tlae projat
as Pm~se~ 'c~ll c~le~rern tl~e qzral'uY of eezstzng deceloprrer¢ ared zeill arate a usr~ally pleasir~ nrnvd~r-actize
r~atiorbhip l~crecera tlae prnpose~ aml eeisting projats, in tliat tlae storage a~ra has Ix~z recieceaz' to aaure
ade~ate prrrusion ~scr~ningfromtlae publu nghzs_of 'reuy rn"adjac~ru propertig•
4. That the site for the proposed use relates to streeu and highways with proper design both as to
width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use.
Tlae proposal use Gxatxl at APN 377•140•019 lxrs Ix~rc yederaEel as to its relation to tlae ~eidth ayel ty[~e ~
pazem~rt ~ to rarry the type ared Ruayuzty ~traffic ger,~rata~ in tJxtt the City Jxrs ~rda~uata~y eurlr~atal the
parernial irrq~acts associatEd zaith tlae propcsa~ cartdoor•starage prior m izs app~rnzrl aml has mrxluiorral tlae proja2
to l~ serrea' by m+ds ~adequate rapaaty ayel deign staYdurcls to pmzide mrsonable aceess by rar, t~udi, tra~ai~
arxl bic}de
5. In approving the subjea use located at APN 377-140-019 there will be no adverse affect on
abutting property on the pemutted and nom~al use thereof.
71ae propasez' use has l~z thoruughly recieteaz' and mrelit'wrxzl by all applirable City Depart~s ared outside
A~energ, eli~ranating the pareruial fora~zy ayxlall adzerse effats on the abuttinBP'°P~1~
6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Sections 17.74.50 of the LEMC have been
incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Perniit to insure that the use continues in
a maiuier envisioned bythese findings for the term of the use.
RESOLUTTON NO. 2005-38
MARCH 15, 2005
Page 3 of 3
Pacisuarn to Sation 17.74.050 (Action ~'the Planni~ C,onvrassion) ~the Lake ELsiyrore Muracipal Cale
(LEMC), the outdoor starage use lcratal at APN 377-140-019 lxrs I~z sd~al~l~l for crosideration a~xl
aPProwl ~th~ePlanningCo~siorz
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Coimnission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Conditional Use Pernut No. 2004-40.
Ron LaPer , Cha~,,,,an
L.ake Elsinore Pluu~iiig Conunission
I hereby certifythat the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Coiim~ission at a meeting
thereof conducted on March 15, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Commissioners: LAPERE, GONZALES, LAIZIMER
Conunissioners:
Cocmivssioners: O'NEAL, UHLRY
Coitunissionexs:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-39
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
DESIGN REVIEW FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. I
2004-06, TO BE LOCATED ON PASADENA STREET AND
CENTRAL AVENUE - APN 377-140-019
WI IEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Carl Johnson of
Triple J Development to request approval of a Design Review for Industrial Project No. I 2004-06
for a five (5) building industrial complex and associated improvemenu; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plamiuig Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on March 15, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of recoinmending approval of industrial projects to City Council.
NOW THEREFORE, the Plamiuig Cocninission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plam~uig Cominission has considered the proposed design for the
industrial building and associated improvements. The Plannuig Conuivssion finds and determines
this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. Mitigated Negative Declaration
No. 2002-03 has been prepared puesuant to Section 15070 of the California Environmental Qualiry
Act (CEQA) and a Habitat Suitability Assessment Letter Report dated March 2, 2005 pursuant to
the requiremenu of the Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan;
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake ELsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The propasal Indust~ial Daign Reciecv loratxl at APN 377-140-019 crnry~lia aeitb tlae gaals aml ahjati~ces ~
the Gen~-al Pla~y in tlaat the approwl g~tl.nse iraJustnal busi~s park zeill asszst in ad~ieri~ in decelo?rre~a ~'
a zeell-balam~l arxl fi~tzonal ~rax ~' r~cideruia~ cmrnrerr'~ ir~fustria~ operi spac~ r~reational a~l
instirutirnwl laral uses as zan'l as erxasr•aging indiacrial la~xl us~s to dizersify Lake Elsiyrore's arononac bzse
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
TlaepropasallrKlirstrial DesignReriervlorataz'atAPN 377-140-019 is appropiiate to tbesite a~xls~zrnxazding
derzlopmmts in tlxu the p~ropasal ireclzutrial buszr.~ss par~i Ixrs Jx~n daigr~l in mrsiderazion ~tlae size arui'
shupe ~tbepropei2y~ th~eyrlry creating irnerest arxl zttrying vstas as a pe~son ~raza alor~g the stra~ Furtlaer tbe
projat as propasal ~ceill cvrr~lemrrt the qyal'z~Y ~eeisting derzlopnrnt aml zeill cmate a zisr~ally plaasin~ ~
de[ractize mlatzonship ~z tlae propcsa~ a~xl existi.ng projaxs in tluu tlae a~ural desigry az~or an~'
rmterials amisixe daign propasal etiderxe a mme~n farqual'uyarel oriSmaluSc
RESOLUITON NO. 2005-39
MARCE315, 2005
Page 2 of 2
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of tlpproval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in anysignificant adverse enviroxunental impacu.
Pursr~arn to tlae rirlifonva E ~zuromremal Qual'uyAct (CE QA), th~e projxisall~lust~ial Desigrz ReuecvlcratEd
at APN 377-140-019, as E~n re~iece~rl a~' mrelatior,~rl by all applirable C'uy Divsiaa a~xl Departnerus arxl
A~erxies, and zzill reo¢ l.e~ie a sigrrifzcarn eJfat on th~e er~ironrrental pursuant to Miri~l Neg~tize D~aratian
Na 2002-03 udoptel by the C'uy Cw.nxi~
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to
guarantees and evidence of compliance
approval of the subject project to insure
objectives Chapter 17.82.
Section 17.82.070, of the Zoning Code, including
with conditions, have been incorporated into the
development of the property in accordance with the
Pursrearrt to Sa2ion 17.74.050 (Adzon ~rlae PlaYnur~g Corrvresszon) ~the Lake Elsi~re Mur¢cipal Cale
(LEMC), tl,~ propc~saz' I~aclitst~ial Design Reiiera~ larate~ at APN 377-140•019 lxrs l~z sd~d~~lEel far
crnaideration aml approurl ~the Planning Crnrmnssion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plaunuig Conunission of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMIVIEND TO THE QTY COLTNQL APPROVAL of
Design Review for Industrial Project No. I 2004-06.
Ron LaPere, a~,,,,an
Lake Elsinore Plaiuiuig Coimnission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on March 15, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Conm~issioners: LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Coimiussioners:
ABSEN'I': Conuivssionexs: O'NEAL, UHI.RY
ABSTAIN: Coiiurvssioners:
ATTEST:
A. Brad"y, ~ecretary~o the Plam~iii~ Coimnission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-40
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-13 FOR THE
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A
RETAIL/OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED ON PARCEL 4 OF
PARCEL MAP 30832, CANYON CREEK °°SUMMERHILL"
SPECIFIC PLAN, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 363-670-
004.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by William
Kipp, Abbacy Holding Corporation, to reqµest the approval of Commercial Design Review No.
2004-13 for the design, construction and establishment of a retail/office building; and.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of recommending approval of Design Reviews for residential projects;
and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on March 15, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for
Commercial Design Review No. 2004-13 and has found it acceptable. The Planning
Commission finds and determines that this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code (LEMC) and determines that Mitigated Negative Declarauon and Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program No. 00-O1 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmentai effects of the
proposed project, based upon the following findings and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings for the project have been made as follows:
FINDINGS - DESIGN REVIEW
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objecuves of the General Plan and
the Zoning District in which the project is located.
71~e propasal Corrm~zial Dgign Rezierv lcrate l-caixhin Assessar Parm' Nu~r'~r 363-670-004 carq~lia
zeith the gaz/s aaxl c~j«tizes ~tlae Ger~-al Pla~ in that tlae approuzl ~this R~ail/~ Baaldi~ zeill
assist in ad~iecing tlae der~Oprrern ~' a zeell-lazlane~l a~xi' furatiorral yrex ~' n~ident~ mnvrercia~
zrx~tna~ opere spac~ r~raztional ared i~rstitutior~cd lared uses, dizersi~j~~ngLakeELsinore's avrro~rnc /aase
U:\xpreisendanz\C 2004-13 Bill Kipp Office Building\PC RESO Design Review.doc
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-13
Page 2 of 3
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The prn~asal Corrare~ual D~ign Recierv lcratal at Ass~sar Pa~a' Num~- 363-670-004 is apprapriate
to the site ami sza»rour,di~ dez~prreius in tlxit tlae Retail/~ Buildi~ lxu l~n dsigr,e~ in
mraxide~-ation ~tlae size a~zl sh.zpe ~tJae proPer[~ tlaemb~' cr~tir~g interest arnl attryir~g zistas as a peison
~ along tl.~ st~ Furtl~• the pmj~ as prapasal zeill cmr~lerrern tlae qual'uy ~eeiscing de.r~oprreru
a~xl zeill cmate a zisr~ally p(Pasi~ ~rd~ractize relationship l~ncecsrz the proposal a~acl etizsting projaxs in
tlaat tlae arrliit«tural deigry az~or ared ~raserials a~xl sire design pmpasa~ eader.ee a amee~n for qual ~uy and
°ngia~l~zt~
3. Subject to the aaached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to
result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuaru to the Qrlifonna ErezironnPntal Qreal'uyAd (CEQAJ, the pro[xzsxl Co»vrerrial Design Reriece~
Icratez' at Assgsrn Parm.' 1V~.rn~r 363-670-004, as re~iece~el a~xl mred'uio-r,~l by all applirable City
Dizisions ared Depart~s ared Age~xies, ~aill nat lxaze a sign'z~'uarn effat on the erzzironm~u pursrearn to
attad~al Coralixzons ~App~vuzL
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guaruitees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with
the objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursr~aru to Sation 17.82.070 (A~tirnz ~tlae Planning Convra'ssion) ~tlae Lake Elsirror~ Muraczpal Cale
(LEMC), the propcsal Carrm~rrial Daign Rederv lcrata~ at A ssessar Parml Nzrrri~r363-670-004 lxrs
~'l 5C~?&~Zf~ fOY Q7Y61C~CYdI[0)Z dYK~ dpjlYOiltl (~ZJl2 P~LLYt17lYl~ COY1DYbS570YG
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COLJNCIL APPROVAL of a
Commercial Design Review No. 2004-13.
Ron LaPe e, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
U:\rpreisendanz\C 2004-13 Bill Kipp Office Building\PC RESO Design Review.doc
PLANIVING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-13
Page 3 of 3
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on March 15, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: O'NEAL, LJHLRY
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
A. Brady, Secretar~o the Planning Commission
U:\rpreisendanz\C 2004-13 Bill Kipp Office Building\PC RESO Design Review.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 41
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL
PROJECT NO. R 2004-20, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
SIX (6) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES, TO BE LOCATED
BETWEEN BAUM AVENUE AND GUTKAES AVENUE
AND ADJACENT TO CHANEY STREET. APN: 375-322-008
THROUGH 019.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Hagan
Investmenu to request Design Review approval for the constnxction of six (6) Single-Faznily
residences; and
WHEREAS, the Plannuig Coinn~ission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Design Review requesu for Residenual Projecu; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plaiuiuig Coiiunission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on Apri15, 2005;
NOW TIIEREFORE, the Plam~uig Cominission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Pluuiing Commission has considered the proposed design for six (6)
Single-Family residences and found them acceptable. The Plamiing Conunission finds and
deternvnes that this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMGj, and the
General Plan, and that this action is exempt from the requiremenu of the Califomia Environmental
Qaality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15332, C1ass 32 (b); (In-fill Development Projects).
SECI'ION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), and Chapter 17.23
(Single Family Residential District); and Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards) of the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMG~ the following findings for the approval or R 2004-20, for
the development of six (6) Single-Family residences have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The propasal ResidenCial Design Reueu~ lcrata~ ~~n Baum Az~n~e a~ad Giulzaa Az~nre a~acl ud3u~jaceru to
Cxia~y Str~t c~lies zeith th~e ~axls ayel abjazizes ~'tlae Ger~-al Plar~ in that tlae approurl ~'the proposa~
hons arnl assaaatal in~zeirems z¢i1l asszst in erxnuragi~ the dereloprrern aral rrttirnenanee ~a brazcl ra~
~h~snz8typ~ frn"all immregrracrps anda~erat~rnies.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-41
April 5, 2005
Page 2 of 2
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
Tlae prnposal Rgidential Dgign Rezieza~ lcratal ~ BaumA ~nre and Cnukue A~ceerwe a~ad acl'aaryu to
d~a~y St~t is apprnpriate to the site a~ad surr~r~ing der~us in that the horr~ arnl assaiatEa'
zrr~mzerreius haze l~ daigr,~l in cwzsicJeratiaz ~ tlae size a~el slxtpe ~tlae IrroPe~zy; th~el~' creutin8 imzrest
aml ztt~ zistcrs as a person rrucg along th~ sts~ F~~rther• the proj~ as propnsal zvll ~lerreru the qa~al'uy
~'existing deielop~rent and zeill cmcue a zisr~a(ly p(Pasing yeorrdaractize mlatior~ship J~tzecen the projxisal a~
eeisti~proja2s in that tlae ardnxarural daigrg cdor ared naateriaLs arxl site designprop~ea' eriderxe a mrxerz for
qz~al'uYaml originalit~
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Purszut~u to tl~e Califorrria Enziro~mprncrl Qyal'uy Act (CEQA), tlae pro[xis~l Residernial Desig~z Reciera~
lcratal zeithin ~ra BaumAzer~re arrcl Crutkaes Aze~ttre arnl adjacer2 to dxa~y Str~ as reuetaed arnl
~ by all applicable C'uy Divsions arel Departrrerns aml Agereag, zeill ~ haie a sigrnf:carn effax on
the erecirnrrrrent pursr~arn to S~ion 15332, (In-fill Dezeloprrern Prnjsxs). Satiora 15332; CYass 32(b) eeerrq~ts
prvjars tl~t are d~aracterizal as "in-fil~" are a~autent zeith the Ger,~ral Plan a~ad Zo~rir~g Orzfzru~me ar,el are
les than fize (S~ acres in size
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incoiporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Punaaarn to S~tion 17.82.070 (Action ~tlae Planning ConvrossionJ ~the Lake Elsirrore Murriapal Cale
(LEMCJ, tlae propasez' Rgiderrtial Dgign ReziEw loratal zeilbin Baum Aze~nre arnl Gutka~,c A~we arnl
adjaa~rt to Cxiareey Str~t laas l~zsd.~al~lEd for anaideratzonayelapprmul ~'thePla~nung Corrarassion
NOW, 'TI IEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plamiuig Cominission of the Ciry
of I,ake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Resid ntial~I'roiect D~~2004-20.
Lake Elsinore Planning Conunission
I herebycertifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Plamung Conm~ission at a meeting
thereof conducted on April 5, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Conuirissioners:
LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Conuivssioners:
ABSENT: Comnvssioners:
O'NEAL, UI-II.RY
ABSTAIN: Coi7uivssioners:
ATTEST:
l/~-
ert A. Bndy, Secretary the Pluuiuig Conurvssion
P:\R 200420 Baum & Gudsaes\45-OS PC RESO.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-42
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH
SECTION 6.1.2 OF THE MULTIPLE SPECIES
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) FOR
THE PROJECT KNOWN AS "COLLIER AVENLTE
BUSINESS PARK".
WHEREAS, a site specific focused survey for Narrow Endemic Plant Species is required by
Section 6.1.2 of the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSQII') for the purpose of
developing an commercial manufacturing condominium business park; and
WHEREAS, the Ciry of Lake Elsinore evaluated the consistency of the project with the
(MSHQ'); and
WHEREAS, the Plamiing Commission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of making recommendation to the City Council adopting the Findings of
Consistency with the MSHCP; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plauning Comaiission
has considered and approved the request bystaff on Apri15, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE as follows:
The Biological Survey Report prepared by Jones & Stokes Inc. has been prepared, submitted
and reviewed in accordance with requiremenu of the Muldple Species Habitat Conservauon
Plan (MSHQ'). The report is complete and adequate in it's evaluation of all environmental
effects of the project known as Collier Avenue Business Park project and will not preclude
the implementation of the MSHQ' goals, based on the following finding;
FINDINGS-MULTIPLE SPECIES I-IABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN
i. The proposed project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution that must make an
MSHQ' Consistencyfinding before approval.
Pursya~u to tlae Cizy's MSHCI' R~cdutiory l~se tlae prvposal projat ~uiYes a nusr~r ~ discrecionary
approu~ls fsvm tlae Cizy and is subjat to CEQA re~ier~ it mast 1~ rezieraal for MSHCP cmazstemy, zehid~
e~uails for the prop~sa~ projat d~emani~ ~ela~l!er it zs subjat to the City's LEAPprocess, mnszstem zeith the
Pyotation ~Spaia Assaiatal uith Riparian/Rizeri~ Amas ared Verr~rl Poal Guideling (MSHCP, ~
6.1.2), Prntation ~NanazvE ~aderrac Plar2 Spaz~ Guidelir,r~ (MSHCP, $ 6.1.3), Addixional Surzey N~s
and Pr~zr~ (MSHCP, § 6.3.2), Urbzn/Wildlands Irnerface Guideli~s (MSHCP, § 6.3.2J,
V~etatzarutilapping (MSHCP; ~ 6.3.1) ~uin~rencs, Fuels Ma~gerrent Crcadelim~ (MSHCP, ~ 6.4), arnl
payrrern ~theMSHCP Loral DereloprrentMitigztion F~ (MSHCP Orclinane~ ~ 4).
RESOLUI'ION NO 2005-42
PAGE 2 OF 3
2. The proposed project is subject to the Joint Project Review process.
Thz forxprint of the proja2 size is loratal zeifhin an MSHCP Criteria A m~ a~xl tlae~'or~ zawedd (~ subj'ax to
the joirn 1'rojat Reriervpra~s.
3. The proposed project is consistent with the Ripaiian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools
Guidelines.
No riparia~ rizeri~ iernal pod/fairyslrri~ hcrbitat ared arl.~eraquatzc rrsac~res ~aere ider2ifial on tlae propase~
projaz site As a r~ul~ ~m further MSHCP anal~azs ar crnaerrutzort ~masur~ are re3uir~l Tlae propasal
projat zs ~rne mnsistzr2 ~rith th~eRiparian/Rizeiin~Arras a~xl Vemal Pods Cnridelims.
4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species
Guidelines.
77~e projax site dar fall zvxhin tlae Narroze~ Er,denac Plarn Sp~ Surzey A~azs. Tlaer~or~ a habitat
assgs~rem zuzs ra~uiral far Narmr~Endermc Plarn Spsia. The prop~al prajaz has l~z dete»ninal to l~
crnaistent zaith tl~eProtH2ion ~NanvzvEr,elerr¢cPlam Spa~s Guidelirees.
5. The proposed projea is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures.
77ae pmjat site faUs zeithin tlae Bunvuing Orcl Surzey Ayea Hoz¢ecer, zt ~atts detemareal zl.r~t the spxia is yrot
eep~l to c~zur on-site due to tlae ladz ~suitabde lxrbixat 77ae projez is tlaeref'rne a~aistern ~airh the Additional
SuizeyNarls Ra~zri~rervs.
6. The proposed project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines.
Me~rsun~ ha~ce l~z iranrparatttl irno tl~epropasaz' projax so that tlae~e zeill !x yro proj«t-rc~ata l drainag~ tcaia,
lighti~ nois~ inmsiu~, Eamers, arecl gradi~//arnl dereloprrern i~rg~acts to tl~e Crnaervztiort Ayru, TGae
propasal projat zs tl~efrnz conszstem zeith the Ur&zn/Wildlands Imerface Guidelines.
7. The proposed project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
The z~etation ~tlae er2i~ projat site lxrs I~n mxppaG 7~iis mapping is suf~rcr'ern under the MSHCP a~l is
crnaistan iaith theMSHCP.
8. The proposed project is consistent with the Fuels Muiagement Guidelines.
77ae jm~[wsal projat lxrs l~z desigre~rl to indude lamiscape br~'en ~ar the propcasal MSHCP Conseruttion
Ama that ~aill in esse~ee act as Fuel Malifuation Zorx3. Wixhin thae amas tJaere ~arll l~ fzr~rzszstarr~ rwn-
arcursize plarus. A~l~ zaith tlaae ~reasurrs, tl~e prnposal projaz zs tl~fore m»sistzrn ~ceith tlae Fzrels
Mara~rer2 G~-ridelin~.
9. The proposed project will be conditioned to pay the Cit}~s MSHQ' Local Development
Mitigation Fee.
As a mr,elitron ~appmur~ the projat zeill J~ re3uir~l to pay the C'uy's MSHCP Lcral DecelopmryuMisigztion
F~ az tbe ti~re ~usua~xe ~birildir~gP~enrats•
RESOLUTION NO 2005-42
PAGE 3 OF 3
10. The proposed project overall is consistent with the MSHQ'.
71~e propasel proj«t mrrq~liES ayel zs mreszste~u zeixh all g~the r~uirttl prnc~lur~c, pdida, arel guideli~s of tl~
City's MSHCP Resdutio~z arxl tlae MSHCP. The appliraru lxrs Yrude n~usirna to the projar ar has agrarl to
spttific cor.ditirna, ~ahid~ z¢ould awrd tlae ~zs ar r~atiz~erte tlae ~fars ~'tlae projat to a poirn ~ no significarn
~'~ ~~:
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Plamiing Couunission of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES F3EREBY RECOIvIn~ND th e Ciry c~l of the Ciry of Lake
Elsinore adopt the Findings of Consistency Seaion 6.1.2. ~.~/~
Ron LaPere, Qiairn~
Lake Elsinore Planning Comnvssion
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Coirunission at a meeting
thereof conducted on Apri15, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: ComcnissioneTS: LAPERE, GONZALES, LP,IZIMER
NOES: Comcnissioners:
ABSENT: Coiiunissioners: O'NEAL, LII~.RY
ABSTAIN: Conm~issioners:
A.
~
y, Secretary
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-43
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. 32911 "FOR CONDOMINIUM
PURI'OSES"
WI-IEREAS, an application has been filed with the Ciry of I.ake Elsinore by Collier
Development Co, LLC, to request approval of a Tentative Parcel Map "For Condomuuum
Purposes" for the establishment of a commercial manufacturing business park and related
improvemenu; and
WHEREAS, the Plamiuig Conunission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of making recommendations to the Ciry Council pertainuig to the subdivision of
land; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plannuig Comnvssion
has considered evidence presented by the Communiry Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on Apri15, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Plamiing Coizunission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plam~uig Comnvssion has considered the proposed subdivision ('I'PM
No. 32911), prior to making a decision to reconunend that the Ciry Council approve the proposed
Tentative Parcel Map "For Condominium Purposes" for the establishment of a commercial
manufacturing business park. The Plaiuung Comnvssion finds and detemunes that this project is
exempt pursuant to CEQA, which exempu infill projects 5 acres or less.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State of California Subdivision Map Act, and the
Ciry of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 32911
"For Condominium Purposes" have been made as follows:
The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for the design and improvement, are
consistent with the General Plan; Zoning Code; Title 16 of the Municipal Code relating to
Subdivisions; and the State Subdivision Map Act.
71~e projat is crnesistem zeith tlae deignatal larxl use plaavnng ama, dezelopn~r¢ aml de.sign stayrlanls, aml all
atlaer appirojniate mr~ui~zrreras arrrtairral in the Ger~eral Pla~y Zoning Cal~ City Mu~napal Cal~ aml
SulxlivsionMapAcx
2. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and
programs specified in the General Plan (Goveriunent Code Section 66473.5).
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-43
PAGE 2 OF 2
7be projat is mnsistem ~aith tlae la~' use plary d~rlop»rnt aml dgign standarcls arel prograrr~, arxl all arl~e~-
aPPmP'7are'~znrerrerms cmuai~l in tJae Ger,e~-al Plan
3. The effects this proposed subdivision is likelyto have upon the housing needs of the region, the
public service requiremenu of iu residents, and the available fiscal and environmental resources
have been considered and balanced.
7~ie projat is a»azstau zeith tlae C'zty's Ger~ral Plan ared Z~ Ca~ zeill prozide ~ssary public sercims and
faalitia, zaill pay all appropriate fa3, a~xl z¢ill rxrt resa~lx in a~zy adzerse erzcironrrerual irrq~ad
4. The design of the subdivision provides to the greatest e~ctent possible, for funxre passive or
natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision (Government Code Section 664123).
The projat ~eill crn~ly zeirh al1 a~rropriace mrrrsserzbxiaz re~ire~s ~'rhe Ciry and Uyaf'ormBuildi~ ccde
NOW, TT~',REFORE, based on the above findings, the Pluuiiiig Conunission of the City
of Lake ELsinore DOES HEREBY RECOIVIIv1END that th City Council of the Ciry of Lake
Elsinore approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 32911 "Fc~f~6~ndo u~' m Purposes".
ROn 1.2~Ye~ ~lairman
Lake Elsinore Pluuiing Cocmnission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Conunission at a meeting
thereof conducted on Apri15, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Conunissione~: LAI'ERE, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Conunissione~:
ABSEN'I': Conui~issioners: O'NEAL, Lk-II.RY
ABSTAIN: Conunissioners:
ATTEST:
~
bert A. rady, Secretary o the
Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-44
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING QTY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
DESIGN REVIEW FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJEG"I' NO. 2004
07, TO BE LOCATED ON COLLIER AVENUE, NORTH
OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE FOR A PROJECI' HIVOWN AS
CALLIER AVENUE BUSINESS PARK- APN 378-030-014
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Collier
Development Co, LLC, to request a Design Review of Industrial Project No. 2004-07 for a
Coiiunercial Manufactw-ing Condominium Business Complex consisting of ten (10) buildings
totaling 62,287 square feet; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Conunission of the City of I.ake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of making recoizunendations to the City Council pertaining to the Design Review
of industrial projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plannuig Coinmission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public meeting held with respect to this item on Apri15, 2005.
NOW TI-IEREFORE, the Planning Conuivssion of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
F3EREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plaruiing Commission has considered the proposed request for the
Industrial Project No. 2004-07 prior to making a decision to recorcunend that the Ciry Council
approve the proposed corxunercial manufacuiriiig business complex. The Plamiiiig Comnvssion
finds and deterxnines this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and that this
action is exempt from the requiremenu of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant to Section 15332.b., I~Fill Dezeloprrent Proj~ts;
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will complywith the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
Thepropasall~dust~ialDesignReuermlcratalatAPN.• 378-030-014 am~li~ ~xitb thegaals and a~ijati~ces ~
tlae Gem~-al Pla~y in that tlae approzul ~'this anrarercral yrarnrfacturi~ co~r~lee zeill assist in ad~ieci~ tlae
dezeloPrrent ~a zeelZ-lazlamt~l arnl fur,~ional ~~'Yesidernia~ m»arerria~ ind~sttriaa~ op~eiz spac~ rr~mational
aml institutional la~acl uses as ze~l as erxazraging indust~ial la~acl use to dizersifyLakeElsirwre's ~rrac• &ase
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-44
PAGE. 2 OF 3
71ae prop~a~ Irxliastrial Deign ReuEw lcratal at APN.• 378-030-014 zs appropriate to the site and
surra~rnfing d~»~rrts in tl,~t tJae pmposxl m»vre~rial yrttrwfacturin8 m~rq~lee lxrs Ix~i desigr,~l in
a~aiderutio~z ~tlae size araa'slaape ~tlaeProPeny~ zheirby cmating irner~st a~xl uarying zistas as a person rroz~s
along the st~ Furtlae~- tJae projax as prop~az' zaill mmplerreru tlae qual~uY ~eeistin8 deceloprrem and zaill
cmate a vsually pleasiny yrortc%ractiee yelatwnship l~ the projxisxl arel eeisti~ p~vjaxs in tlxct tlae
ard~itatural daigry az~ora~xl mxterial arxl site dgigia prop~xl eciderxe a mm~nz far qz~alityared oriSia~liryi
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacu.
Purs~arn to tlae Cctlifrnnia E ~zuromremal Qr~al'uyAd (CE QAJ, tl.~ pro~asallrelustrial D~cign Reueia~lcrcital
at APN.• 378-030-014, as reaecv~l arxl arrx(ixior,~l by all applirable Cuy Diusio~a arel DepartrreMS a~'
A~r~ria, zvill yrot Ixa~ce a signifuant effa2 on tJae eretirrnnrern pu~suarn to Artide 19 (Categorrcal
Exemptrons~ ancl Sa2ion 15332 (In-Fill DevelopmentPmjects).
4. Conditions and safeguards puxsuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incoiporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pun~arn to Sation 17.82.070 (Adion ~the Plamzir~g Crnraression~ ~tlae Lake Elsinore Municipal Cale
(LEMCJ, the jnoposez' Inaust~ial Desig~z Reiieiv lorata~ at 378-030•014 laas Ix~n sd~e%Ixl for crnaide~-atzarc
ayxl app~vrul by thePla~vaing Co»nrassion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plamiuig Commission of the City
of Lake ELsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMIvIEND ft'~THE Q C'~~OiJNQL APPROVAL of
Design Review for Industrial Project No. 2004-07. ~ ~ ~~
Ron LaY7ere, Chaini~an `
Lake Elsinore Plannuig Conuivssion
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Pluuiuig Comnvssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on Apri15, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Conunissioners: LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Cominissioners:
ABSENT: Conunissioners: O'NEAL, UHLRY
ABSTAIN: Coi7unissionexs:
RESOLUI'ION NO. 2005-44
PAGE. 3 OF 3
ATTEST:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005 - 45
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~, ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 408 FRANKLIN
STREET - APN 373-034-O11
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Hector Zubieta
requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for a Single Family Residence pursuant to Chapter
17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requiremenu) and Chapter 17.14 (Residential
Development Standards) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMG~ and the F~istoric Elsinore
Architectural Design Standards;
WHEREAS, the Plazuiuig Coiiunission of the Ciry of Lake ELsinore has been delegated with
the responsibilityof approving Minor Design Review requesu for Single FamilyResidential Projects;
WI IEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Pluining Cominission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on Apri119, 2005; and
NOW THEREFORE, the Pluuiing Conunission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECI'ION 1. The Plamiuig Cominission has considered the proposed design for the single
family residence and has found it acceptable. The Plamung Commission finds and determines this
project is consistent with the Lake ELsinore Municipal Code. This project has been found to be
exempt from further environmental clearance under Section 15303, Class 3(a) (New Construction or
Convexsion of Small Structures), of the Califomia Environmental QualityAct (CEQA).
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
77ae propc~sal Mirror Dgign Rerzerr~ lcratal at 408 Franklin St~ cv»~lies eeixb tlae gaals ared ahjazizes of th~e
Ger~r•al Pla~ in that tlae approwl ~'the single fanaly nniderxe zaill assist in adnering the der~loprrprrt ~'a wdl-
&z/arzal arxl fu~xt'iorxrl ~rex ~'resic%rmia~ crnrarercia~ i~ustr'u~ open spac~ r~ereational arxl institutional (and
uses as ~aell as exwaraging tl~e deceloprrern arnl mzirnename ~a bnad rar~e ~lxxaraz8 types frn" all ineon~
gra~ps arxl age ratEgories.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The prop~al MiYror Design Reuezv lcratal at Franklin Stn~t is ap[nnjrriate in tlae size a~acl sunvuraa'ing
der~opnz~u in that the sin~lefayraly ~aiderxe zeill crn~lerrern tlae RualuJ' ~eezsting d~lopmmt ayrl ~rill crzate
a zisually plPasing ~rorrd~raczize mlaxioreship Iz~ze~n th~e p~vpasa~ aml existing projaxs in that tl~e ardiitatural
desigry az~ararel rrttterials propose~ ~ ar eec~l thesize a~acl design ~tlae hn»rs in thesurrarrxfir~garr~
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 45
PAGE 2 OF 2
APRIL 19, 2005
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in anysignificant adverse environmental impacts.
7lae propasal Minrn-Dgign ReziEwlcratal at 408 Franklin St~ as n~iereEel ared a~ixior,~l by all applirable
Cuy Divsirna and Departrr,errts and Agerazes, -ceill ~ haze a signifirarn e~t on the ertriYOmrerrt pursuarn to
Anide 19 (~ategoriral Exerr~tions~ ared Sa2ion 15303, dass 3(a) (Nera~Consrrrution or Corccenion gfSmrll
Smutures) ~tlae Califwroa E7zcironrrerrtal ~al'uyAct (CEQA).
4. Conditions and safeguards pucst
guai~ntees and evidence of cosr
approval of the subject project to
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
mt to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including
~liance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
ensure development of the property in accordance with the
Mirror Design Rezierm ~a single fa~raly ~sider.ee laratal at 408 Franklin Stra~ has lx~i eurlr~atal pursr~ant to
Satzo~z 17.82.100 (Mirror Desigre Reuera~ ~ the Lake Elsiyeore Mzancipal Cale (LEMCJ and all ovJaer
applirable S~tians ~'the LEMC 77ae projat 7uzs fa~ar~l to l~ in ~liame ~ceith all ~egulcrC'wrs aml d~jatizes g~
LEMCand theH'sstoncElsinereA~zhixszural Design Stdr.elarzls.
NOW, TI-IEREFORE, based on the above F' dings, the Pluuiing Coi7unission of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE ' r D ign 'e for a Single Family Residence
located at 408 Fruiklin Street.
Ron L ere,
Lake Elsinore Planning Conuivssion
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plazuiing Coinnvssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on Apri119, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Cocxunissionexs: LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Conm~issioners:
ABSENT: Conmiissionets: O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Coiiuivssioners:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 46
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY
COUNCIL OF TAE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE THE
COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEDINGS TO AMEND
THE CITY'S ZONING CODE TO INCLUDE "M-3"
ZONING DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore desires to initiate a project
consisting of updating the City's current zoning code (Title 17, LEMC, updated as
of October, 2000) to include a new "M-3" District. The Intent of the "M-3"
District is to reserve appropriate locations consistent with the General Plan to
accommodate a full range of mineral resource extraction and related
manufacturing in order to strengthen the City's economic base and to increase
employment opporiunities. Locations for the "M-3" District may have operationa]
characteristics or features that make their location near less intensive uses or
highly visible areas of the City inappropriate. However, uses which have nuisance
features that cannot be mitigated or which pose a threat to public health or safety
shall not be permitted. The "M-3" District includes appropriate development
criteria to assure a quality of appearance of all structures and uses from public
rights-of-way and provides appropriate public safety and health regulations in
order to encowage the long term viability of the District as well as to attract
desirable users.
WHEREAS, the reasons for the proposed "M-3" District is as
follows: The City seeks to establish a zone that is consistent with the General Plan
that will accommodate mineral resowce extraction and related manufacturing.
Currently the City only allows a limited type of mining land use within its "M-2"
zoning designation with the Conditional Use Permit and a County of Riverside
Ordinance No. 555 permit. The creation of an "M-3" District will allow the City
to continue to authorize and expand where appropriate mineral resource extraction
and related manufacturing within its jurisdiction. Consequently, this
administrative action provides the City the opporiunity to improve the zoning
restrictions and development standards to better address issues commonly related
with this high intensity industrial and mining land use; and,
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission certifies that: This project
qualifies for a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption, as there
are no reasonably foreseeable consequences of the proposed approval. The project
will not have a significant effect on the environment and is consistent with the
City's adopted General Plan and Zoning Code.
1. Per CEQA guideline 15062(a), file a notice of exemption with the State
Clearinghouse.
WHEREAS, notice was duly given of the public hearing on
establishing this new M-3 zone through a newspaper of general circulation and
posting of the Planning Commission hearing was made at City Hall and other
appropriate and authorized public notice areas.
1. The Planning Commission proceedings were commenced by City Staff
recommendations to the Planning commission for approval.
2. This new M-3 ordinance is proposed to provide opportunities for new mining
and related land uses in order to encourage economic growth in the community by
providing new jobs, new incomes and scazce mined material required for
development of new housing products and the like businesses.
3. No specific application of the M-3 zone is currently contemplated with the
Resolution.
4. The new M-3 zone is consistent with the General Planned concepts for mining
related uses both inside and outside the City's incoxporated boundaries.
5. Application of this new M-3 zone will be done on a case by case basis by pre-
zoning or zoning a specific parcel(s) of land that have been reviewed pursuant to
appropriate City regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Then foregoing recitals are true and correct.
2. The M-3 Ordinance was properly published for public hearing.
3. The Planning commission does hereby approve and recommend to the Lake
Elsinore City Council for approval the update to Title 17, LEMC adopting the
new M-3 ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning
Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND on
this 19`~ day of Apri12005 at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of
the City of Lake Elsinore to the City of Lake Elsinore City Council, the adoption
of the "M-3" Zoning District.
AYES: LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT: O'NEAL
Ron LaPere, Chairman
City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
Secretary to the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 47
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. 2005-03
WI~CH ENTAILS DESIGN REVIEW OF A FOUR-PLAN
MODEL HOME COMPLEX AND PRODUCTION UNITS
WHICH WILL BE CONSTRUCTED THROUGHOUT 104
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS WITHIN TRACT
MAI' NO. 28214-2
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Castle & Cooke
requesting Design Review approval of a four-plan Model Home Complex and ultunate development
of production uniu throughout 104 lots within Tract Map No. 28214-2. The proposed residential
lou comprise approximately 35.71 acres and are located at the southeast corner of I,ake Street and
Alberhill Ranch Road, within the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Plam~uig Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of approving Design Review requesu for residential projects; and
WI IEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Conunission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public meeting held with respect to this item on Apri119, 2005.
NOW TI~',REFORE, the Plam~uig Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Pluinuig Coiiunission has considered the proposed design for the four-
plan Model Home Complex and production uniu and has found them acceptable. The Plazining
Conunission finds and determines this project is consistent with the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan
and the 2003 Addendum to the 1989 Final Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Impact
Report. Under Section 15182 of the California Environmental QualiryAct (CEQA) Guidelines, this
project has been declared exempt from fwther environmental clearance.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Secuon 17.82 (Design Review) of the I.ake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of Residential Project No. 2005-03 have
been made as follows:
1. Subjea to the attached conditions the proposed projea is not anticipated to result in any
significant adverse environmental impacts.
Staff has deterrrar~l that this projax zs cmaistern zaith tlae All~rhill Rarro'i Spazfu Plan arnl Tracrt Map Na
28214-2. 77ae 2003 Addereclum to tlae 1989 Firurl All~rhill Randi Spaz~c Plan Ercrimrrrrental Irr~act
Reprnt proz:des ade~ate erccironrrernal dearame and anal~sis for this proposa~ Dgign Reveze~ application
Urnler Satiorz 15182 ~tlae Califo~r4a E~zcironn~ntal Qual~uyAd (CEQA) Cnadelirxs, this projax has lz~n
c(ala~l exar~t fYVmfurtber erairnrrrrental dearame
2. The project complies with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the General Plan and the
Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan, as approved.
As disaessa~ tl~e Ger.~ral Plan deignats tlae pmjat sile as "AlF~rhill Randi Spaific P/an': 71~e Al/~rlnll
Randr Spai~icPlan desigrrrues the proja2 site as Single Farr~lyResiderniaZ TractMap Na 28214-2 and the
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-47
PAGE 2
pro[~asa~ ~la' hare ~ler a~xl prra~dion zants are mresisteru zeith tlae Sin~e Fa~r¢ly Rgideraial designatzon
arnl applicable der~Oprrent a~deignstarklards.
3. This project complies with the design directives contained in Chapter 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
The pmpcse~ projsz is apprrpriate to tlae site a~acl surnxrrading dezdoprrer¢s in tlxu the projat zeill mr~smut
sin~fanaly detad~l rmrrs in aaordanee zvxh appropriate derelop~reru ayxl design standards mrnaireal in the
All~rhill Ramh Sp~zficPlan 7Tae projax cr~axe imerc~t a~xl ~uurying vstas as a person rmz~ alongany projat
stra~ 711e prnjaz also crny~ilerr,erns the qual'uY ~eezstin8 ~i~ilaorin8 d~op»~u arecl zeill mrrtirnre to pmzide
zisHallppleasi~desigraand a~iitature zeitlrin theA(l~rhill Rand~ ama.
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070, including guaiantees and evidence of
compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the project to ensure
development of the property in accordance with the General Plan, Municipal Code, and
Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan, as approved.
7~ae Plartrring Convrg'ssion l.~as crnaideral tl~e projat and fi~a's tlxit ~eith mred'uirna ~' ap[nvru~ tJae projat
cmr¢~lia 7vixl~ the pur~iases and abjatius ~th~e Resider¢ial Desigr~ Reuera~p~z~ess.
NOW, TI-IEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Pluu~ing Commission of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE ResidentiaLRroiect No. 2005-03.
Lake Elsinore Pluuiing Counnission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plamiuig Cominission at a meeting
thereof conducted on Apri119, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Coimivssioners: LAPERE, GONZAI.ES, LARIMER
NOES: Coiiuiussioners:
ABSENT: Conuivssioners: O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Conunissionexs:
ATTEST:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 48
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-
25 WHICH ENTAILS DESIGN REVIE W OF A FOUR-PLAN
MODEL HOME COMPLEX AND PRODUCI'ION UNITS
WHICH WILL BE CONSTRUCI'ED THROUGHOUT 147
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS WITHIN TRACT
MAI' NO. 31706
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Pardee Homes
requesting Design Review approval of a four-plan Model Home Complex and ultimate development
of production uniu throughout 1471ou within Traa Map No. 31706. The proposed residential lou
comprise approximately 54.5 acres and are located at the northwest corner of Hillside Drive and
RedberryPalms Court and is defined as Plannuig Area 23 bythe Canyon E-3'ills Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Comnvssion of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Design Review requesu for residential projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Couunission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public meeting held with respect to this item on Apri119, 2005.
NOW TI~',REFORE, the Plaiu~uig Conm~ission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed design for the four-
plan Model Home Complex and production units and has found them acceptable. The Pluining
Commission finds and determines this project is consistent with the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and
the 2003 Addendum to the 1989 Final Canyon I~'ills Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report.
Under Section 15182 of the California Environmental Qualiry Act (CEQA) Guidelines, this projea
has been declared exempt from further environmental clearance.
SECI'ION 2. That in accordance with Section 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following finciings for the approval of Residential Project No. 2004-25 have
been made as follows:
1. Subject to the attached conditions the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any
significant advexse environmental impacts.
Staff ~has dete~rrarxel that this projaz is caazstem zaith tlae Car~vn H'71ls Spaifu Plan arnl Tract Map Na
31706. Tlae 2003 Adderecl%rm to the 1989 Final ~r~m H~ILs S~c Plan E~zcironrrental Irr~act Re~art
proudes ada7uate e~zcirrnmerrtal dezra~e aml a~xd~sis far this propasa~ Design Reuecv applicatirnz Unefer
Saxiorc 15182 g~the California E~zciro~vrerual Qyal'uyAd (CE QAJ Cnadelina, ~~~ ~~ a~~
eeerrg7t f~nmfunher e~zcironrrental dazraaxe
2. The project complies with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the General Plan and the
Canyon H'ills Specific Plan, as approved.
As diswssa~ tlae Ger~ral Plan desigrnrzzts the projat site as "Car~m H'~lls Sj~«ifu Plan': The Car~m H~lls
Sp~if'icPlan dgignates th~e pmjsx sixe as SF2. Tracz Map Na 31706 ayel the
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-48
PAGE 2
propasaz~ mdel hrnre mrrq~lex arxl prrdurtion urriu aYe a~aistera zazth the SF2 desigration a~xl appliral~e
dezelop~reru arxl daignsta~xla~zls.
3. This project complies with the design directives contained in Chapter 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Lake ELsinore Municipal Code.
The prnpc~a~ prajaz is apprnjrriate to tlae sire a7xl surnnrr,ding deza'opirerus in that the pmjax zai(l cor,strud
si~le fa~raly detada~el rnriu in aaordarx~ ~eith appropnare derelopm~u and design star~lards crnuai~l in tbe
Ca~rnz HalLs Sp~ifu• Plan 7he pmjat cmata intemst arxl zttrying vstas as a person rrazes along a~zy projat
st~ The pmjat also cor~lem>rrts tlae qual'uY ~~ ~~8 ~8hb~rin8 d~u a~zl -ceill cor2inrae to prozide
zisucdly~pleasirlg design ayel ard~itature ~eithin th~e Ca~z~vn Hill.s amc~
4. Conditions and safeguards puesuant to Chapter 17.82.070, including guaz-azuees and evidence of
compliance with conditions, have been incoxporated into the approval of the project to ensure
developsnent of the property in accordance with the General Plan, Municipal Code, and Canyon
F3'ills Specific Plan, as approved.
7be Planning Corrmassion has cmaider~a' tJae projaz arad fi~x(s that ~¢ith miaditirna ~app~vru~ the projat
cmr~lis ~eith the purpczses arxl d~jatizg ~th~e Residerural Design Recieu~prrxxss.
NOW, TI-IEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planni a CoiYUivssion of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Residen a~'rojea No. 2004-25.
Ron I.aPe're, ChauYnan
Lake Elsinore Plamiing Conunission
I herebycertifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Plann~ a Conunission at a meeting
thereof conducted on Apri119, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Comnvssioners: LAPERE, GONZALES, L.ARIMER
NOES: Conunissionexs:
ABSENT: Conunissioners: O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Conuivssioners:
ATTEST:
bert dy, ecretary o the
luuiuig Comnvssion
RESOLUI'ION NO. 2005- 49
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORrTIA,
APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE TO BE LOCATED AT 29520 LA
SHELL STREET (APN 378-162-033)
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Jaime Narciso
to request Minor Design Review and approval of a 1,918 square two-story home with a 489 square
foot attached garage.
WI IEREAS, the Plaiuiuig Commission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Minor Design Review requests for single family detached dwellings
per Section 17.82.100.A.2 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code; and
NOW TF3EREFORE, the Planning Conunission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Conunission has considered the proposed design for the single
family detached dwelling and has found it acceptable. The Plazining Coimnission finds and
detexrnines this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and that this action is
exempt from further environmental clearance under Section 15303.a, C1ass 3 of the Califomia
Envirorunental QualityAct (CEQA).
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Section 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will complywith the goa]s and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
Tlae propasa~MiYror-Daign Reciervlcrataz' at 29520 La Sha'l Strc~t co~rg~lia z¢ith tbe gazls and ahj'axi~ ~the
Ger,~ral Pla~y in tlxit tlae approu:l ~this sir~fa~raly r~ide~xr zeill assist in ad~ieu~ tlae d~r~r~nt g~a zeell-
bala~l aml furtttianal rr~ ~~idem~ ~ indust~ia~ open spuc~ r~rnac'ronal aml i~atitutional laral
uses as zaell as e~xnztraging the de~prre~u and rrttirnenamz ~a brazd ra~z ~har~sing ty[~ }~ar all imrnre
groups arxl age rate~arig.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The propnsal Minor Deign Reaerv(cratal at 29520 La She(l Str~ is apprapriate to tl~e site a~'sur~i~
detelopnenu in that tlae single fanaly ho»p lxu l~n deigr,~l in caaiderazion ~ tl~ size a~ad sl.~ape ~ zlae
RESOLUI'ION NO. 2005- 49
PAGE NO. 2
Propert~ themby ciratzn$ irner~st a~ 7uur~ar~g zistas as a person rr,nzrs along tlae str~ Further t!~ p~ajat as
pro[rasxl zaill am~lerr,eru the qual~uY gFeeisting dezdop»~nt arxl zerll cmate a usucrlly pleasi~ r,rnrcl~ractzze
relutio~ahip l~t~rc the p~vpasal ur~l eezsting prujats in tl.iat the ardritxtzaral dsigry cdar a~xl rmterials
propas~l eec~xls the size ancl design ~tlae horr~ in tlae surrwsrdingarra.
3. Subjea to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacu.
Pursr~arn to tJae Califrnrua Ertti~vrrm~rtal Qyal'uyAd (CEQAJ, tlae jnopasalMirrorDaign Reziermlorat~rl at
29520 La Sha'l Str~ as 7euecexl arxl ~izzorxzl by all applirable City Dizisior~ arxl Departm~ms and
Agerxies, ~aill n~t lxaee a signifuam effat on the enzi~vmrprn pursuarn to Artide 19 (Categorical
Exemp[rons) and Saxiaz 15303 (New Constructron orConversion ofSmall Structzues).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including
guaz.uitees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Ckiapter 17.82.
Purs~aru to Sa~'wn 17.82.100 (Mirror Design Rezieza~ y~tJae Lake Elsi~mre Mzmiapal Ccde (LEMC), the
pro[xisa~Mi~r Deign Revere~laruEd at 29520 La Shell Strat has lx~n sd~alyla~l aml cmaider~zl far approurl
by thePla~ri~ Co»vre,ssion
NOW, Tf 3EREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Pluuiiug Coimnission of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Minor Design Review of a single family residence to
be located at 29520 La Shell Street.
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Pluuiuig Conunission at a meeting
thereof conduaed on Apri15, 2005 bythe following vote:
Lake Elsinore Pluiiiuig Conmvssion
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 49
PAGE NO. 3
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Commissioners:
Comnvssioners:
Comcnissioners:
Comaussioners:
LAPERE, GONZALES, LARIMER
O'NEAL
RESOLLITION NO. 2005-50
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CONIMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A TWO-
STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT
16852 ULMER STREET, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 378-
181-70.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of I,ake Elsinore by Mr. Daniel
I.opez, requesting a Minor Design Review of a two-story Single-Family Residence; and
WHEREAS, the Plamiuig Coirunission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving a Minor Design Review for Single Family Residences; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plazuiing Coinmission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on May 3, 2005.
NOW 'I~IEREFORE, the Plazuiuig Coiiunission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECT'ION 1. The Plam~uig Comcnission has considered the proposed request for a Minor
Design Review for a 1,674 square foot two-story Single Family Residence and has found it
acceptable. The Plauning Conunission finds and detern~ines that this project is consistent with
Chapter 17.23 ("R 1) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and that this action is exempt from the
requiremenu of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article 19
(Cat~rnuul Exerr~itiors) Section 15303, Class 3(a); (Nera~Const~zrc~ion ar Co~zzersion ~Smdl Struvures).
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.23
(Single Family Residential District), and Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards) of the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMG~ the following findings far the approval of Minor Design
Review of a SFR located at 16852 Ulmer Street, for the development of a two-story Single-Family
residential development have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goaLs and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning Distria in which the project is located.
7Tae prop~a~ Reside~uial Design Reuervla~atal at 16852 Ulrrer St~ c~lig zeith th~e ~caLs an~' abjatizes ~
the Ger~-al Pla~y in tlaat tlae appmurl g~'tlae pmpasal I~are ayxl assaiatal iar~roze~rents zzill asszst in
enm¢craging tlae decelaprrer~t ared rrairuenanre ~a bmzd ran~ ~hausing types far all imrnre groups a~ad a~e
ratc~vr~.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-50
May 5, 2005
Page 2 of 3
2. The projea complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
7'l~e pmpasaz' Rgideraial Design Reiierv loratez' at 16852 Ulrrer- Strt~t is appropriatz to tl~e site a~a'
sunn¢axling der~rrerus in tlaat the ho~re ared associata~l irrq~rozem~nts haze F~z design~l in anaiderazion ~tbe
size ar~el shape ~tlae Prn~erc~ ~Y a~eating interest and zttryirrg ustas as a pe~son ~mzg along tl~ stra~
Furtlae~- the projaz as p~vpasal ~ei/l crnrg~lerrem the Rr~aluY ~existing decelo~rera aml zeill cmate a zisually
pleasin~ rron-d~-actize r~lationship lx~zeceri tlae pro,oose~ a~xl oeisti~ proj«u in tlxu tl.~ ard~itat~zral desigr~
az~ora~ad mzterrcrls a7xl sixe design p~v~xsal erider,ee a cnr,e~rn forqual~uya~acl original'u~
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed projea is not anticipated to result
in anysignificant adve~e environmental impacts.
Purar~am to tlae Califonva Erariron»rrrtal ~al'uy Act (CEQAJ, th~e prop~al Resider2ial Dgign Reuera~
lcxata~l at 16852 Ulrrer Strt~t as ~eriezaeel arxl mr~dit'wr~l by all appli~e C'uy Dizisiara a~a' Depart~rents
and Age~xig, -ceill nc~ lazze a sign'zficarn ~'at on tlae azumrrrreat pznsr~a~rn to Sa2ion 15332, (I~fill
Dere~rer2 Projars). Satiaiz 15303; dass 3(aJ; eeerr~ts proja~s that are daaracterise~as "NezvConstru~'wn
or ar~zze~sion ~smzll scructums"are crnzszsterrt zaith tlae Genzral Plan a~xl Zorung Ordiname
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guarazuees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incoxporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursr~am w Satio~z 17.82.070 (Actzon ~'tlae Plamung Cwra~assiorr~ ~tlae Lake Elsirrore Miancipal Ccde
(LEMC), the propnsat Residermial Design Reiiezv lcrate~l at 16852 Ulm~- St~ /~as l~z sd~alyl~zl far
crnaiderationand approurl ~tlaePlamnng Convrassion
NOW, Tf~REFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plamiuig Commission of the City
of I.ake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE the Minor Design Review for a two-story Single-
FamilyResidence located at 16852 IJhner Street.
Ronald aPere, Chauman
Lake Elsinore Plaimuig Commission
I hereby cenify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plamiuig Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on May3, 2005, bythe following vote:
AYES: Conmvssioners: LAPERE, GONLALES, LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSEN'I': Coimiilssioners: O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Conunissioners:
P:\MDROFASFR~ 16852ULMERSTREEI'~PCRESOMinorDesignReview53-OS.doc
ATTEST: Coi7unissioneis:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-51
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 214 DAVIS STREET -
APN 374-121-008
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Carlo Sampson
requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for a Single Family Residence pursuant to Chapter
17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) and Chapter 17.14 (Residential
Development Standards) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (I.EMG~ and the I-~istoric Elsinore
Architectural Design Standards; and
WFIEREAS, the Plam~uig Cominission of the Caty of I,ake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Minor Design Review requesu for Single FamilyResidendal Projects;
and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plaziuiug Coinmission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on May 3, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Conunission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Pluuiiiig Commission has considered the proposed design for the single
family residence and has found it acceptable. The Plam~uig Commission finds and detemiines that
this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the I3istoric Overlay District
and is exempt from further environmental clearance under Section 15303, Class 3(a) (New
Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), of the California Environmental Qualiry Act
~~QA)•
SECI'ION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The pmpasal Mirmr Design Rerier~ lcraza~ at 214 Dazzs Stra~ anrqilies zeixh the gcals a~a' abjazius ~'the
Ger~ral Pla~y in tlxtt tlae apprarul ~tl~e singlefarraly ~sider.ee zeill asszst in ad~iecing tlae d~t gFa zadl-
Jxrlarx~l a~xl fur,rizonal rra,~ ~'yeside~ura~ mnvreizia~ i~xlust~ia~ op~eiz spac~ rr~rYac"ronal ayel i~atucrtirnral la~ad
uses as zeell as axasragrng tlae decelopirera a~ad rrai~uenarece ~a brazd ra~2 9Fl~sinS types }~or all inmrre
gYlX~JS dYK~ d~ C[LLE~07'Y(5.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
71~e propasa~ Miyror Design Rerzcw Icrata~ at 214 Dazis Srn~t zs approj»iate in tlae size ami surn~~rrling
derelopnent in tl~zt tlae single~fa~raly n~iderKe zeill c~leireru the qHaluy ~eeisting decel~rient aml zeill cmaxe
a u'suallyplaasing rroro-cfetractize Yelatior~ship ~ t/aepro[xisalamleeistingprojazs in that tlae ardiit~tural
desi~ az~ararnl muerials propose~ rr~t areeca~l tl~esizearxl design ~tbe hn»rs in tlae su»a~nxlingam~
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-51
PAGE 2 OF 2
May 3, 2005
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
71ae prvptxe~ Minrn- Design Reverm lcratea' at 214 Dazis Strat as yeziec¢c~l arxl ~uior,~a' by all applirable
City Dizisirna anl Departrrer2s arxl A~ereaa, zaill nn¢ have a sigru~uarn ~'at on th~e er~imrrrrern pzasHam to
Artide 19 (Categoririrl Exerrq~tionsJ arxl Satio~z 15303, Class 3(aJ (Nera~Corstn-rdion ar Canzersion ~Smrll
Strydums) ~tlae C'alifrn~aia Erniro~vrental Qtial~uyAct (CEQAJ.
4. Conditions and safeguards piusuant to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including
guaiantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incoxporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Minor Dgign Recieu~ ~a single fa~r¢lly resider~z loratal at 214 Davs Str~t l~as l~ri erttluatal pu~suam to
Sation 17.82.100 (Mirror Dgign Rerieu~ ~'the Lake Elsiazore Muru¢pal Ca(e (LEMC) ared all otlaer
appli~a&'e Sa2ior~s ~'rhe LEMC 71ae projaz ~ts fa-aad to l~ in c~liame zvxh all n~lations a~xl oJ~jarius ~
LEMCand tlae HutoricElsirroreArd~itatural Dgign Sta~x(arzls.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above m' gs, the ' g Commission of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE ' r Des n i for a Single Family Residence
located at 214 Davis Street.
Ron L re, Cliurman
Lake Elsinore Planning Conunission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Plamiing Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on May 3, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Cotruivssioneis: LAI'ERE, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Coma~issionecs:
ABSENT: Comnvssioners: O'NEAL
ABSTAIN: Cominissioners:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-52
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CTTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFOliNIA,
APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 2005-02 FOR VARIOUS
SIGNAGE PROPOSED WITHIN THE SIGN PROGRAM
FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS THE LAKE ELSINORE
SQUARE LOCATED ON 20.93 ACRES AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF CENTRAL AND COLLIER
AVENLJES.
WHEREAS, Frank Coda, Greenberg Farrow Architects has initiated proceedings for the
approval of Variance No. 2004-04 for the Lake Elsinore Market Place; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of approving Variances; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on May 17, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Variance No.
2005-02 prior to approval. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Final
Environmental Impact Report (SCH NO. 2004031090) is adequate and prepared in accordance
with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes
environmental effects of ends City Council certification, based upon the following findings and
determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Variance No. 2005-02 has been made as
follows:
1. That adequate conditions and safeguaz•ds pursuant to Section 17.76.050 have been
incorporated into the approval of the Variance to insure development of the property in
accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the plam~uig district in
which the site is located;
Pursr~aru to Sation 17.76.050 (Action ~tlae Planning Co»massion) ~tlae Lake ElsirroreMumdpal Cale
(LEMC), tl,~ propnsal zttria~xe grarning an irxmase in tlae hei~iy a~xl sc~am footccge ~tl~ f~sta~xling
F~ratty Orierit~rl Sigra cmuai~l in tl~ Sign Prrogram for tbe She~ping Ceruer krrorva as tlae Lake
Elsinrne Sq~earz has l~z sd~alul~el far amside~-atzonayel ap~auzl ~thePlanrring Cararassion
2. That there are special circumstances, pursuant to the purpose of this Chapter, applicable to
the subject propeny which do apply generally to other properties in the neighborhood, and,
therefore, granting of the Variance shall not constitute a grant of special privilege
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION FOR
VARIANCE NO. 2005-02
Page 2 of 2
inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and district in which
the subject property is located.
7?ae City lxas cnrm'~da~l tlxat caardering tlae tceeruyf~ (25 J eleuuion d'zffererxe ared the s~ laadz distanez
l~izea~z Imeistate 15 aml tl,~ Shopping Czrver tlaat tlae gramingan irxyaa,se in tlae h~ei~ ayelsquare foaru~e
~tl,~ fn~stc~yeling Fr~rauy Orieruxl Signs zaill ~ro¢ a»atid.ue a grant ~sP~nal Pnzrl~s iravrszste~u zvxh
the liaratatio~a upon arherpropertia in tlae a.icz'nizyarzl district in zahid~ the subjax prnj«t is lorutav'
3. That in approving the Variance, any reductions authorized from the strict interpretation of
the Zoning Ordinance represents the *n;~;*num deviauon from the Code necessary to fulfill
the puxpose of this Chapter and enable reasonable development of the property.
Ingraruingan i~xmdse in tlae h~ei~iy ayel sqx~are faxage ~tlae frt~staydingFrc~reuy OrientEd Sig~a tl.~ Ciry
lxrs deterni~l thaz tl.~ ra3r~est fora ~ttriamz wll m[msau tlae nanimma dedation from tlae Cale r~essary
to fu~l tJae pur,brzse ~this rlaapterarrl eraable masonal~'e d~c~iu ~theP~P~1i
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY approve Varia ce . 2005-02.
Ron LaP , Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on May 17, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-53
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING SIGN PROGRAM NO. 2005-O1 FOR THE
COMMERCIAL RETAIL CENTER KNOWN AS LAKE
ELSINORE SQUARE LOCATED ON 20.93 ACRES AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF CENTRAL AND COLLIER
AVENUES
WHEREAS, Frank Coda, Greenberg Farrow Architects has initiated proceedings far Sign
Program No. 2005-01; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of approving Sign Programs; and
WHEREAS, public norice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Deparhnent
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on May 17, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered proposed Sign Program 2005-
Ol prior to making a decision for approval. The Planning Commission finds and determines that
the Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH NO. 2004031090) is adequate and prepared in
accordance with the requirements of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which
analyzes environmental effects based upon the following findings and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Sign Program No. 2005-01 has been
made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and
the Zoning District in which the project is located.
71ae propasa~ Sign Program for the Corr~i~roal Shoppirr~ Center knarmz as tlae Lake Elsinore Square
crnrplies zeixh tl,~ ~OZ/s arad abj~zzzes ~tl~e Gen~-al Pla~y in tTxtt th~e approzul ~'this Sign Pr~-am ~ei(l
asszst in ad~iecing tlae ~»eru ~ a zeell-lxdane~l ayd fiaaaional ~x ~ ~siderrtic~ cwmrerzia~
i~ust~ia~ o~erispac~ r~reac'roralarxlinctizutionallarxluses, diee~si~' LakeE/sinrne'saz~reonac&ase
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
Tlae projxisal Sign Prog~-amfor the C~rn~al Shopping C'zrner k~un as th~e Lake Elsinor~ Square
zs appropriate w th~e site ami szsrracrr,ding de~rerus in tlxu tl.~ Sigri Program far the Lake Elsinore
SquamTxrs l~z desigr.~zl in m~sideraxion ~tlae size ami sh,zpe ~tlae prnpert~ theml~y cmating imerest ard
uzrying zistas as a person ~raz~ alazg the st~ F~srtlaer tlae pmjat as pro[x~sal ~aill mrr~ilerrer2 the R~uY
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
SIGN PROGRAM NO. 2005-01
Page 2 of 2
~'etizstzng decelop~rent a~a' zeill cmate a zis~ally pleasin~ nrnrcl~-actize relatirnahip lx~e~ri th~e propasaz'
arxl eeisting projats in tl~zt tJae ardntatural desigry az~or ar~el ~raterials arxl site design propasa~ euderxe a
mrxenz farqr~al'ztyarxl ori8inaingc
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of tlpproval, the proposed project is not anticipated to
result in anysignificant adverse environmental impacu.
Purstutrn to the Califorrdct E~zzironrrernal Q~al'uy Ad (CEQAJ, tl.~ pro/wsal Sigrt P~vgram for th~e
Shc~ping Ce~uer k~rvz as tlae Lake Elsinore Sqz~are, as mrzezeal arad mrd'uior,az' by all applircrl~e
~~~a~ Ytrrerns, zeill ~ haze a sigr¢firant ~'xt on tlae ernirwarent pursz~arn to attad~el
4. Conditions and safeguu-ds pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guarazurtees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incoxporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with
the objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursr~aru to Ss~zaa 17.82.070 (Actirnz ~'thePlaymar~g Co»vrssszor~ ~t1ae Lake ElsiaeomMurricipal Cale
(LEMCJ, th~e pr~iasa~ Sign P~agramfor the Crnrnn~aa[ Shopping Cerrtzrknnren as the Lake Elsinore
Squam l.icis Ix~resdaalul~el farm~aideratiaz aYxlapp~vurl ~tlaePlayuring Co»vrassion
' NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
. of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY approve Sign P gr No. 2005-01.
Ron La ere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on May 17, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEBT:
o ert '. Bra , Secr to the
Planning Commissio
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-54
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CONIMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~, ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 30352 GEDGE
AVENUE - APN 375-323-001 & 002
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of I,ake Elsinore by George F.
Mears requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for a Single Family Residence pu~uant to
Ckiapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.23
(R 1, Single Family Residential District), and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requiremenu) of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMGj; and
WHEREAS, the Plamung Conuivssion of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Minor Design Review requesu for Single FamilyResidential Projecu;
and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plannina Coinmission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on June 7, 2005.
NOW TI-IEREFORE, the Plauning Comnvssion of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECI'ION 1. The Plam~uig Conunission has considered the proposed design for the single
family residence and has found it acceptable. The Piaeu~uig Cocnnvssion finds and determines that
this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and is exempt from further
environmental clearance under Section 15303, C1ass 3(a) (New Consuuction or Conversion of Small
Structures), of the California Environmental QualityAct (CEQA).
SECI'ION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of ha~e been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will complywith the goaLs and objectives of the General Pian and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
77aepra[~nsalMinrn-DesignRedece~lcratalat 30352 Ga~~eAzerwec~lies zeith tlaegarls ayelcJ~jatizes ~tlae
Ger.~ral Plary in tlazt tlae appmuzl ~the singlefanzly rrsiclerxe zeill asszst in adriecing tlae deido~m ~a zea'l-
&alamz~ a~xl fir~iorral Yrax ~~xidemia~ cnnvrercia~ i~lust~ia~ open spuc~ ~a~eatioraal ayxl i~atituciorral lared
uses as ~crll as erxr~uraging tlae d~loprr~u and mzirvenarx~ gfa broad rar~e ~hauszn8 ty[~.frn' all i~rnre
grcx.rps arad a~ ratc~oris.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Secuon 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
7lae pmpnsad Minrn- Design ReziEwlcratal at 30352 Ga~ Azernre u appropriate in tJ~ size a~xl surnxrredi~ag
decelop~re~u in tlzit the single~fayraly residerxe zvill ~le~renc the qualrry ~eezstzng der~u a~acl ~¢ill c~eate
a zisually pJzasin~ rron-d~raczzze mlatirnalrip l~t~ea~c the prvpnsal aml eeisting projaxs in tlxit the anliit~tural
desigr; aalar and nttterials pmp~al rr,~t or exc~xl tlae size a~xl design gFtlae hrnres in tlae szmoea,eli~am~
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-54
PAGE 2 OF 2
JuivE ~, zoo5
3. Subjea to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacu.
Th~ pro[xicxl Mir,nr Design Retieca~ lorata~ at 30352 Gs~e Azznue as ~rcierz~l ayxl m~itzor~l j~, crll
appli~e City Divsirna a~xl Depa~trreras a~xl Abemies, zri/1 y,~ Jaaze a signifuurn ~'~t on tJae erzcirarrrreru
pursz~aru to A~tide 19 (~t~micul Exerrq7tiara) aml Sation 15303, dass 3(aJ (Necv Cazst~udion ar
Corccersiwz ~Sm~ll Structur~s) ~thz California Enci~amrernal ~al~ityAd (CE'~q),
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Cliapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including
guu~antees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incoiporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Mir~-DBignReci~w~a single fanaly r~siderKe lorata~cat 30352 Ge~Aze~we laas Jx~rz eurly~at~lpyrrsy~ay~t to
Sation 17.82.100 (Minrn- Dsign Reuez¢~ ~'tlae Lake Elsinore Municipcrl Ca1e (LEMCJ arxl all ~r
applirable Satirna ~'the LEMC 7'l.~ proja~t zezrs fa.r~xl to l~ in cwr¢~liarxe ~rixh all n~cr(ations arxl abjatizes ~'
LEMCar,a'tlxH'zstrnicElsirr~ArdntaturaZDesign Stayelayds.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Coi~iission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Mino,~D s'ign Review for a Single Faxnily Residence
located at 30352 Gedge Avenue. ^~ 1~m
Ron La`pere, Chair~4~an
Lake Elsinore Plamiuig Commission
I hereby cextify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plazinuig Cominission at a meeting
thereof conducted on June 7, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Conunissionexs: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LEIIZIMER
NOES: Conunissionexs:
ABSENT: Conunissioners:
ABSTAIN: Comnvssioners:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-55
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORrTIA,
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-02
FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A"DRIVE-THROUGH
FACILITY" LOCATED ON PAD "15" OF PLANNING
AREA 4, OF THE CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE.
WHEREAS, Steve Schneider, Lyons, Warren & Associates, has initiated proceedings to
request the approval of Conditional Use Pemut No. 2004-20 for the establishment of a"Drive-
'11~rough Facility" to be located on Pad "15" of Plamvng Area 4, of the Canyon I-~'ills Market Place;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Permits; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planiung Coinmission
has considered evidence presented by the Communiry Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on June 7, 2005.
NOW TI-~REFORE, the Pluiiiuig Commission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plaiuvng Commission has considered the proposed Conditional Use
Pemut 2005-02 prior to approval. The Plam~uig Coinmission finds and determines that the
Addendum to the 1989 Final Canyon H'ills Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, which was
prepared in accordance with Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, provides the necessary
env~ronmental clearances for the proposed application, based upon the following findings and
determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Plazuiuig and Zoning law and the Ciry of Lake
Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Conditional Use Pem~it No. 2005-02 have been
made as follows:
1. The proposed use, on iu own meriu and within the conte~n of iu setting, is in accord with the
objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the pluuiuig district in which the site is
located.
In o~zler to ad~iece a zeell balar~l arnl fumt'wnal ~x ~ residern~cr~ mna~pn.icr~ irau' ~stria~ o~en sPac~
r~azioral ared irc,titutional la~xl us~c, staffhas tlaor%ughly eurlr~ata~l tlae larxt use ~tibilit~ nws~ traf~'rca~a'
atlaer er~i~ronrrental l~aza~zls 7rlatxl to tlae ~az' Coradizioral Use Pernat far tl~ ~cta&'ishrr~nt ~a "Dri~ce~
Thrat~i Facility" loratal on Pad "I S" ~Plarrning A ma 4, ~'th~e ~a~ryvra Hills Market Place Ammlingly~
tl.~ prvpasal larel use is in ~rKe -ceixh the d~jatiz~ ~'tlae Ger,~ral Plan arxl tlae pur[xise ~'tlae pTiantting
discrict in zehid~ tl~size is lcrata~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2005-02
Page 2 of 3
2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, coxnfort, or general
welfaze of pexsons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the Ciry,
or injurious to propexty or improvements in the neighborhood or the Ciry.
Inaarnd zaixh tlae purpases ~tlae Claapter 17.74 (Coreditional UsePernatsJ ~'theLakeElsirroreMurridpal
Cal~ tlae Gty rezliza~ tlxit the praposal Corxl~uional UsePenraz far tlae ~tablishm~rt ~'a "Drize77~rasgh
Facility" lcnzt~el onPad "15" ~Planni~Ar~t 4, ~'the CanyrmH'rlls Mark~Place mzylaazea p~er~Cial to
r~Zta'ulY ~arq~act tl~ zz~'fare ~persrna rrsidir~g ar zearking zeizbiin tl~ n~i~ilx~rlaocd ar tlae Cit~c Considering this,
staff lxcs sul~stanCiat~el tlaut all applirable CityDepartnrrrts aYelA~erxia laaze lx~rtaffonla~ tlae o~portunity for
a thorozr~i reciezv~'tlae usearellzxze inemporutalall applirable a»rarems ard/ar mre/'u'wm rdaxal to
installatiaz a~ rmir~tenanee ~lara~lsaepi~ str~t d~ications, r~gulations ~'l~rus ~'ze'~ia~lar ingress arxl e~nss
arxl mntral ~'poterniul ransanms, so as to eli~natz any n~tize i~actt to tlae geiaeral hpaltb, safe[1S ~~5 ~'
gerx~-al zea~fa~ ~tlaesur~ading ~i~ilrorhoal ar tlae C'u,~
3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all
the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffexs and other features required by Title 17
of the LEMG
7?ae pro[xua~ Cor~el'u.'~rl Use Pe~rret far the establislnrent ~a "Drizc~7lnro¢igh Faality" l~xat~el on Pad "1 S°
gFPlurnting Ama 4, ~'tlae Car~}nn H~ILs Marhet Place lxrs (~z desigr,~l in crnaideratzon ~tJae size a~xl slzzpe
~~P~K1S rh~rFil' St~engtl~era'T8 a~xl erdaa~ t!~ i~r~diate a»rnrercial a~u. Furtlae, tlae pxxjax as
propasa~ zaill cm~lerrern tlae qHal ~uY c~'etizsting deidop»eru ayxl ~eill cmcue a zis~al~y plPasin~ rron-cl~ractize
mlaciarahip ~zvc~z the propasal aml ocisting prr~ats, in tlx~t tJae propasa~ use l.as ~ rc~iezettl to aaure
ade~~ate prozrsi~e ~scrr~aingfiomtl.~ publrc n~ts-~''catty rn"ad acerrt properti~•
4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width
and type of pavement to carrythe type and quantityof traffic generated bythe subject use.
71ae pro[~os~l Care(itioraal UsePe»rat far the esta(~zshrrcm ~a "DrizeThrough Faality" lorated onPad "IS"
~PlamringArez 4, ~'tlae Ca~vizHiUs Market Placslxrs l~zYezierzeel as to its mlation to tlae ~h a~xl type
~Pazem~u ~d to rarry the cy~e a~xl quarn~j' ~traffu'~"ata~ in tlaqx tJae City lxrs ada~zratdy ewl~atal
tlaepar~aiul irrqxrcts assaiat~el ~ceith thep~vpasal use prior to its apprnzul a~xl has mrditiar,~ tlaeprqat to l~
~bY ~~~~"1~ ~P~IY aaxl design sta~zlards to p~vride musor~rbleaass by rar, cnro~, tra~ai~ arxl
5. In approving the subject use located on Pad "15" of Planning Area 4, of the Canyon I-3'ills
Market Place there will be no adveise affect on abutting property or the permitted and normal
use thereof.
Tlaeprapasal use l.as lx~rz ~ghly recieue~a~xl ~uirn.~el byall applirable C'uyDepart~s a~xl w~tside
A~, a'i~ri~tin8 tlaeParernutl foraazy arxlall aclzerse ~ats on tlaeabutc'inBP~~
6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.74.50 of the LEMC have been
incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Pem~it to insure that the use continues in
a n~uiuer envisioned by these findings for the term of the use.
Purszuant to Se2ron 17.74.050 (A~tirnz gFthe Pla~nairg ConarassionJ ~the Lake Elsirrore Mumcipal Ccde
(LEMC~, tlaepropasa~ C.axlitioaal Use Pernat for tlae esta&'islmeru ~a "DriieThrougli Facility" loraxa~ on
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2005-02
Page 3 of 3
Pad "IS" ~Plararing Ama 4, ~tl.~ Can}nrc H'rlls Mark~ Place has l~ri sdaalulall for cwesideratiaz aml
aPPrautl ~ttl~ Planning Corrvreuion
NOW, Ti~REFORE, based on the above findings, the Plamzing Comnvssion of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Conditional Use Pernut No. 2005-02.
Ron LaPere,
Lake Elsinore Plannina Coinmission
I herebycertifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Plannuig Conunission at a meeting
thereof conducted on June 7, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Comnvssioners:
Conuivssionexs:
Conunissionexs:
Coi7unissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZAL,ES, LARIMER
(~(~
~obert A. Brady, Secre to the
Plaiuvng Comnvssio
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 56
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CAMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~, ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNQL APPROVAL OF
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-03, FOR A
"DRIVE-THROUGH" RESTAURANT FACILITY
LOCATED ON PAD "15" OF PLANNING AREA 4, OF THE
CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Steve Schneider,
Lyons, Warren & Associates, to request a Commercial Design Review No. 2005-03 for a"drive
through" restaurant faciliry building totaling 2,783 square feet on .649 acres of vacant land;
WHEREAS, the Plauuuig Cominission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertau~uig to the Design Review
of industrial projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plaiming Coirunission
has considered evidence presented by the Communiry Development Deparunent and other
interested parties at a public meeting held with respect to this item on June 7, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Coiiunission of the Caty of I.ake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plamiuig Conm~ission has considered the proposed request for the
Commercial Design Review No. 2005-03 prior to making a decision to recommend that the Ciry
Council approve the proposed "drive through" restaurant facility. The Plamiuig Commission finds
and deternunes that the Addendum to the 1989 Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan Environmental
Impact Report, which was prepared in accordance with Section 15164 of the State CEQA
Guidelines, provides the necessary environmental clearances for the proposed application, based
upon the following findings and detenninations;
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the I.ake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goaLs and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
77ae prropasal Corroreraal Desigiz Reciervlcratal on Pad "1 S" ~Pla~ringAma 4, ~tl.~ Ca~nn H:lls Mark~
Place crnr~lies zeixh th~e gcals ayel abjatizs ~the Ger~ral Plary in tlaat tlae approurl ~this drizz thrau~i"
~stauram faality ~eill assist in adrieung tl,~ deza~op~r,e~u of a zeeU-&zlane~l araa' fir~zorral rre~ ~'yaidemia~
~~ ire~st~ia~ o[~z spac~ r~rYational arxl i~tituczonal larxl use as zeell as enmuragir~g ~trial larxt
usg wdizersifyLakeElsinrne's avnorrecbase
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEWN0.2005-03
Page 2 of 3
7~ae propasal Carnn~zial Design Reuece~lcrata~' on Pad "1 S" ~'PlaymzngAroz 4, ~tlae Carry~m Hills Markd
Place zs appropriate to tlae site a~'surrw.nading deceloprrerar in tlxit tlae proposal "dYize thrrac~~i" restauram
fadlity l.~s !~z daigr~l in crnsideration ~'tlae size a~xl sl.e~pe ~'tlae ProPertJs tlae+ebY crea~in8 irnzist ared
7uu~ya~ zistus as a person rr,nzes along th~e str~ Further the proj~t as px~j~as~l ~aill ~lerrerrt tl.~ Rr~aluJ' ~'
cezstzng d~celopmru a~xl zeill cmate a zisraal~y pleasin~ yrorrclet~ractize relarirnahip l~[ze~n th~e p~ropasal a~l
existingprojars in tl.~zt the ard~ixatural dgigrg a~ora~xl ~reuerial ayxlsite desigras prop~al eziclerKe a mr~em for
qual'uYa~xl origiml'uy
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed projea is not anticipated to result
in anysignificant adveise environmental impacts.
7Yae Adderxlum to tl~ 1989 Final Canyrnz Hills Spszfic Plan E~zuronm~ual I~r~iact Re~ zeliid~ zurs
prrPar~l in aarnzlame ~eith Sation 15164 ~'tlae State CEQA Gaada'i~s, prozides the r.~essary encirrnvrer~al
dearaners for tlae propasal appliratio~a. A~~ staff l~lieus tJae pmposa~ applirations i~lemm tlae larul
use abj~i2ec arxl Ya3zri~rrems ~tlae Spaif ~u Plan a~xl find.c tlxu funh~r erzrironrrental eurlyation zs th~'or~
ravas~ssar}~
4. Conditions and safegiiards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incoiporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Puisuam to Sa2ion 17.82.070 (Adio~z ~'tlae Plamring Caimn'ssiorr~ ~the Lake Elsirrore Murucipal Ccde
(LEMCJ, tlae propasal Crnrnrerziul Desig~z Reueu~loratal on Pad "IS" ~PlanrringA~az 4, ~tJae ~~nn
Hil/s Markd Place laas lx~rz sd.~lulal far mr~siderationarxl approurl by tlaeP/anning Corrarassion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plaiuiuig Comnvssion of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMIv1END TO THE QTY COLJNQL APPROVAL of
Design Review for Industrial Project No. 200405.
Ron LaPere, Ch '
Lake Elsinore Platuiing Coiiuivssion
I herebycertifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Plann~na Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on June 7, 2005 bythe following vote:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
COMNIERQAL DESIGN REVIEWNO. 2005-03
Page 3 of 3
AYES:Conuivssionexs: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Coi7unissioners:
ABSENT: Commissionets:
ABSTAIN: Comnvssioners:
ATTEST:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 57
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CTTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF THE 2005-
2010 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, The City of Lake Elsinore has incorporated a program from which
improvements to the City's infrastructure, park property, lake facilities and other capital items
are scheduled and financed; and
WHEREAS, the document in which these projects are organized is called the Capital
Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the program has a format based on a five year projections and is updated on
an annual basis; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, under Government
Code 65401 has been delegated with the responsibility of finding consistency between the
Capital Improvement Program and the General Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed 2005-2010 Capital
Improvement Program and find it consistent with the City's General Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND~t the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve the proposed 2005-2010 Capital I rov ment Program.
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
PLANNING CAMMISION RESOLUTION FOR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NO. 2005-57
Page 2 of 2
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on June 07, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
A. Brady, Secretary t~the
iQ Commission ~
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-58
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANIVING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ADOPTION OF
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2005-O1
AND THE MITIGATION MO1vITORING PROGRAM
THERETO, FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO.
2005-O1, AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE CANYON CREEK
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 85-1, AND TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 32077, ON APPROXIMATELY 140+ ACRES
LOCATED NORTHEAST OF INTERSTATE 15,
APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE WEST OF CANYON
LAKE, WEST OF SUMMERHILL DRIVE, SOUTH OF
GREENWALD, AND SOUTH OF THE EXTENSION OF
LA STRADA ROAD, ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING
TUSCANY HILLS COMMUNITY TO THE EAST, AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 363-020-008.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by La
Strada Partners, LLC subto divide approximately 140+ acres of unimproved properiy into
134 residential lots, a neighborhood park/recreational facility, water reservoir and basin
sites, and seven (7) open space lots; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council
pertaining to amendments and the subdivision of land; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Deparhnent and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item
on June 21, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Pianning Commission has considered the proposed mitigated
negative declaration prior making a decision to recommend that the City Council adopt
the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-O1 and the Mitigation Monitoring Program
thereto. Pursuant to Section 15063, of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
it has been determined that:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-58
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2005-O1
JUNE 21, 2005
PAGE 2 OF 3
1. The proposed project is located within and contains habitat suitable for several
listed species that would occupy Riversidian coastal sage scrub. The project site is
located within the Riverside County Multiple species Habitat Conservation Plan
(MSHCP) area and has been reviewed by Riverside County and the Riverside
Conservation Authority (RCA). The project will set aside 75.5 acres of the project
site for permanent retention in accordance with MSHCP requirements. Based on
approval of this mitigation, the project will not cause either project specific or
cumulative unavoidable significant impacts on biological resources as outlined in
the CEQA Guidelines.
2. No cumulative environmental impacts have been identified in association with the
proposed project that cannot be mitigated to a less than significant impact level.
Potentially significant cumulative effects are reduced to a less than significant
impact level for biological resources, air quality and traffic.
3. A number of project impacts were identified as having a potential to significantly
impact humans, either directly or indirectly. Noise, traffic, air quality, and
geology impacts all pose a potential for adverse impacts to humans, but mitigation
measures have been established to control these impacts to a less than significant
impact level. With implementation of the identified measures, the proposed
project is not forecast to cause significant adverse impacts to humans. All such
impacts are avoidable and the City will ensure that measures imposed to protect
humans are implemented.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of
the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMENDS that the City Council of the
City of Lake Elsinore adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-01 and the
Mitigation Monitoring Program thereto.
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 58
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2005-O1
JLJNE 21, 2005
PAGE 3 OF 3
I hereby certify that the preceding Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission
at a meeting thereof conducted on June 21, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
nission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-59
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH
THE MULTI-SPEQES HABITAT CONSERVATION
PLAN (MSHCP) FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-O1,
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE CANYON CREEK
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 85-1, AND TENTATIVE TRACT
MAl' NO. 32077, LOCATED AT APN 363-020-008.
WHEREAS, La Strada Partners, LLC has submitted applications for General Plan
Amendment No. 2005-O1, Amendment No. 3 to the Canyon Creek Specific Plan No. 85-1, and
Tentative Tract Map No. 32077, located northeast of Intexstate 15, approximately one mile west of
Canyon Lake, west of Summerhill Drive, south of Greenwald, and south of the extension of L.a
Strada Road, adjacent to Tuscany F3'ills to the east, and known as Assessor's Parcel Number 363-
020-008;
WI~REAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2005-01, Amendment No. 3 to the Canyon
Creek Specific Plan No. 85-1, and Tentative Tract Map No. 32077 together comprise the "project"
as defined bySection 21065 of the California Environmental QualityAa (CEQA), California Public
Resources Code § 21000 et seq., which is defined as an activiry which may cause either a direct
physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the
environment and which includes the issuance to a person of a lease, permit, license, certificate, or
other entidement for use by one or more public agencies;
WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the subject project has been prepared to
evaluate environmental impacts resulting with the project;
WHEREAS, public notice of said project has been given, and the City Council has
considered evidence presented by the Communiry Development Department and other interested
paities at a public hearing held with respect to this item on June 21, 2005;
NOW TIIEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plamiing Conunission has considered the proposed General Plan
Amendment No. 2005-O1, Amendment No. 3 to the Canyon Creek Specific Plan No. 85-1, and
Tentative Tract Map No. 32077. The Pluining Coirunission finds and detemunes that the project
known as"La Strada" is consistent with all of the required procedures, policies, guidelines and
provisions of the MSHQ' based on the following findings:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2005-59
MSHCP CONSISTENCY
PAGE TWO
1. The proposed project is a projec[ under the Cit}~s MSHQ' Resolution, and the City must
make an MSHQ' Consistencyfinding before approval.
The propasal projat n~ui~rs a nu~r~- ~'discm~zonarY aPProurIS fro»z tl,~ City ar,el is subj~ to CEQA
reciece~ Pursr~arn to tlae Cizy's MSHCI' Resdauior~ tlae projar mut 1~ reiieread for MSHCP cureszste~x~
crnaistern zeilh the Prat~irnz ~ Sp~is Assaiatad uith Riparian/Ri2eri~ Araas arxl Verr~l Pod
Guidelia~s (MSHCP, § 6.1.2), P~ion ~'NarrormE~xle~rac Plaru Sp~is Cnrideli~s (MSHCP, §
6.1.3), Additional Surtey Na~ls aml P~ (MSHCP, § 6.3.2), Urfxcn/Wildla~s Iynerface
Guidelir,~s (MSHCP, § 6.1.4), V~ratirnz Mapping (MSHCP, § 6.3.1) r~uirerr,e~us, Fuels
Mana~err,eru Guidelia~s (MSHCP, § 6.4), a~xl palm~m ~theMSHCP Lcrctl Deceloprrent Mitigztion
Fce (MSHCP O~zlinane~ § 4J.
2. The proposed project is subject to the Cit~s LEAP and the Count}~s Joint Project Review
processes.
71ae projat site is zeirhin Cell 4456 ~Cell Grwsp `B' iaz Subunit S~the Lake Elsirrore A ma P(a~y and
t~efor~ subjax w tl.~ C'uy's LEAP and the Casrny~s Joisn Projax Recrecvpraesses.
3. The proposed project is consistent with the Ripaiian/Riverine Areas and Vemal Pools
Guidelines.
No ze»url po~/fairy shrirr~ habitat arzm~ rnaite I~acts zeweld msult to apprazinttteiy 0.1 acre gF'
scerth~enz zeillacvscnrb as part ~the La Strada Rard aacite cazstnutiort Tlae proposal pmjaz -ceill Ix
cor,dztior,~l to prepare a D~ernanatiart yf Bidogically Equiurlern or Suaeiiar Przseruttiarz (DEBSPJ
anal~azs for n~ieze~arxl aPP~I bY ~ C~'P+~" ~~~8 a 8~"~P~}~ar tlae prr~at 71ae p~vpose~
projar is ~orecmaisteru ~eith theRiparian/Ri~ceri~Amcu a~xl Verr~rlPods Cnrideli~.
4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species
Guidelines.
Tl~ projat site dc~ yrot fall ~ceithin the 1Vanoze~ EYefernic Plarn Spaia Su~zey A~ras. 77ae~efor~ laabitat
assesm~s ancl%r faz~sal surre~s a~ nar ra~uiml for Narrmv E~lerrac Plarn Spais. 71ae propasal
prvjat zc tlae~f'ore m~azstem ~eith th~ePraration ~Narrace~EydeiricPla~u Spa~es Cnuda~in~s.
5. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional SurveyNeeds and Procedures.
77ae projat site falls ~eithin the Burrozaing Ocel SurceyAmu. A bcmrn¢ing ozel surrey lxu l~rz crnxl~.rcted by
HELIX E~zci~vmn~r¢al Pla~ar~ Irec zeith ~ztize raults. 7Yae projex zs th~or~ cmaiste~u zaith tl.~
Arld'uzonal Surzey Narls Re~ui>errerns. No atl~- C3iteria A ma Sp~ (NEPSSA) ar NarrozvEr.elerrac
Sp~ (CASSAJ su~ze~a are re3ui~ a~xl all NEPSSA aml CA SSA ra3uirerreius haze lx~rc n~
6. The proposed project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2005-59
MSHCI' CONSISTENCY
PAGE THREE
Tl.~ fdlaceing ~surs zeill l~ i~rq~lerrernal by tlae projaz to ~rayuyraze the adein~ pa~erural iredircrt
irrg~acts, i~udir~g
• All projar nanyf zeill F~ Creatai'priar to exixing tlaesite to r~rluce taeins.
• Detention &ui~a propasal zritbin tlae proja2 fo~p~im ~eiU aaure that tl~ zs rro irxmase in flozea
framtlaeprojat imoMSHCP ConseruatiareAmas.
• All prnj~ lig/~tireg ~eill l~ ~rz~l m F~s~atizelYPla~ dirazal arxl shiefdxl azettl'.~P~~
lxtbitats. In add'uiory lar~e sparla~it-type lxrd~~ard lighcing di~l irno mrae~zaz' habitat zeill !x
~~
• No plarns irdudal in Table 6•2 ~tlaeMSHCP ~urll Jx usal ar~z on the sit~ ayel a~y rcui~ce
sp~ zeill l~ plarval adjace,n to open space amas. A lisr ~prahib'~taz'sjrazes zeill l~ prvrida~ to
ho~cs}e~s•
• The proposal projaz has l~rc desigr.~a'so tl.~zt reo addizioncd take ~cmzsercm' haGixat zvll f~
~sarY. frn. fu~ rrxxG~'uationPurpases.
• MarnrfacCi.er~a'slopes assaiata~ ~eith thepropasalsite deulo[nrent7vill ~ eeterxl i~uo theMSHCP
mreserrntian area
Tl~ propas~l projat zs th~rne m~aistem zeith th~e Urbzn/Wildlamis I~uerface Guidelin~s.
7. The proposed project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requiremenu.
77ae ze~xation ~the ernin projax sixe has l~ mzppal cwzsiste~u zaith MSHCP ~rttPPzn%PmPa~ arxl laas
l~z pmzidaz' in digixal fornut to th~e Cit~c 7yn's mzpping zs su~iaerrt u~ader theMSHCP arxl is cvrcczstem
-ceith t1aeMSHC1' u~ation nttpping re3uirerrer2s.
8. The proposed project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines.
Tl,~ pro,brzse~ proj~ has l~rz desi~l to ir,rlude laydsraj~e buffers on tl.~ zeestern ~ge ~'tlae de~p»pr~t
~ry Yrear tlae projxisa•l MSHCP Conseruttian Amct tbat zeill seize as Fua~ Malifwztr'on Zor~s w tl~
nsidential derrloprre~u Witl~in tl~ese amcts tlaere zeill l~ fzre~reszsta~ rrorttia~rusize pla~us that haze l~z
utilizaz' f~vm tl.~ lzst mrnain~l zeith the MSHCP Om'inanee a~xl lxaze lx~z reziere~el by the City~s Fire
Depa~tm~ All fua' rmr~ge~rent amas azztr ~sicle ~the MSHCP Crniseruuion Amcr, A m»~a'i~j~
z¢ivh tlage nrasures, tlae prnpasez' projat zs th~rne anazstern ~aith tlae FueJs Marcagerreru Guideli~s.
9. The proposed project will be conditioned to pay the Cit~s MSHQ' Local Development
Mitigation Fee.
As a coredixion ~'appmrzr~ tl.~ pmjat zaill !~ ~ttrttl to pay the C'u}js MSHCP Lcral Dereloprient
Mixigac'wnF~at tlae tiyre ~issuame ~buildinBPem~1s. 7~e czernm fce far msiderrtral dycelop~rent zaith a
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2005-59
MSHCP CONSISTENCY
PAGE FOUR
density ~'[ess tl.urri 8.0 dzea'ling r~mts per acre zs $1,651 pe~- dz¢dli~ aa~iz This is crnazstan ~ceirh tlae
MSHCI'MizigztionF~ re~uin~rer~
10. The proposed project overall is consistent with the MSHQ'.
Tlae MSHCP shozea tlxtt the projar site zs zeithin Cell 4456 ~Cell Gra.rp B' in Sr~br~ut 5~tlae Lake
ElsiYrore Ama Plan C~raerrtttion zeithin this Cell Crror.rp is interadal m mrnribrrte to the asserr&~Y ~'
P~pnsaz' L inka~e 8. Co~aerrution zeithin the Cell Cmxrp zeill faz~s on daaparra~ mastcrl sa~e sc~zrb, a~xl
grasslar~ lu~bitat A~as cmaerr~l zeitl~ tlae Ca'l Grzxsp -ceill !~ mrw.~t~rl to mastal sa~e scrzrb a~xl dxcpurral
habixat propasal far amservzt'wn in Cell Group A' to the rrorth a~xl Ca'l C'rro~rp C to tlae sauth.
Conservation ~eithin tl~e Cell Grou~p zvll ran~e f~mn 70 to 80 per~eru ~the Cell Gro~rp, fausing in tbe
e~cster~z portion ~'th~e Ca'l Gywsp.
Ba~aaae rhe eastenz side ~'the prr~erty to tl,~ north ~enuld Jx der~ mrservztion ~'tlae eetnrre eustenz
Pa+tion ~Czll Gmup 7rizhin ~rhid~ the La Stracla projaz is lattt~el zew.r(d n~ anuribctte to a~rrr,~tizity m the
yrorrh. In retaining rlae rrortlrceest to so¢uhecrst mnn~zizrc~s rlae ~mst eff 'arize zeuy to mai~uain mm~tizity is ro
shift crnzserrution in Cell Group B' touurd the ce~ural portion ~'tlae Cel Cmaup. L orating der~nt in
tbe eastem portion ~the Cdl GnxrP (adjucern to existing der~Op»prrt to the east and propasal deza'o(m~ru
to tbe rrorth) zeadd aJso rranirroze tl~ armuru ~alge l~t~n d'u~t arel the Habitat Preserze 71ae
ProP~~ ~O?~ ~S~'atzon ~Id p~vride mrn~2iziry to eezsting Habitat 1'~aerce in tl~e cerr~-al
Port~on ~tJae Cal C'rroesp to tlae sarth (C) a~xl na~rozas tozeunl iu soutl,ieyra erxl to m~iyrrsze com~tizity to
la~xts that ntty l~ crnaerzal in the «tre~ ~stenz portzort ~'Ca'l G~sp C' in tlaefiuure
71~epropaaz'projata~r~'ig~-ation~eauldpreserzeappmzimztely75.Saaesgf'Rizersideansa~scnrb. Basal
on the co~'iguration ~tlae mr,seruztiort as descrila~l a6ez~ tlae projax addressa tlae ~rlerttrn bidogiozl zssues
arxl cmaider-atioia ~thesubunit b~r
Proziding a rernthzegt-s~tl~ast conr.~tion alaig the hills (xtze~rz EstelleMa~rnain ar,el Sa~co
Hzlls, in~uding poter2ial linkage Ixrbitat for arutal Califrnnia gnatrntdaer
P~vuding a~re arel linkage habitat far tlae la~-ay Stepl~ens' kangzro~ ra~ aaxl Qcar,n d~erspa
bcure~lyc
Thuc, tlae projat prozia'es ef~i¢e cmzservztion on the proj~ site w rr,a~ tlae bidog'ual zssues arxl
m~aiderations ~tlae MHSCP, arxl tbe projax is tlae~rne crnaistau zeith theMSHCl'.
11. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the agency, that the
projea as revised mayhave significant effect on the environment.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2005-59
MSHCP CONSISTENCY
PAGE FIVE
NOW, THEREFORE, puxsuant to the above findings, the Plamvng Conunission of the
City of Lake Elsinore, California, DOES HEREBY RECOMIVIEND that the Cary Council that the
Ciryof I,ake Elsinore adopt the Findings of Consistencyhereof.
Ron LaPere, Glairman
Lake Elsinore Plamiuig Comnvssion
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plaiuung Conuivssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on June 21, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Conunissionexs:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONLALES
NOES: Comnvssioners:
ABSENT: Conuivssioners:
LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Coimnissioneis:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-60
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CTTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-O1, CHANGING THE
CLASSIFICATION OF LA STRADA ROAD ON THE
GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT, FROM
"MAJOR ROADWAY" TO "MODIFIED SECONDARY
ROADWAY" FROM SUMMERHILL DRIVE TO
FRANKLIN STREET.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by La
Strada Partners, LLC. to change the General Plan Circulation Element roadway
classification of La Strada Road from "Major" to "Modified Secondary," at its terminus
with Summerhill Drive and southwesterly to Franklin Street; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council
pertaining to proposed amendments; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Deparhnent and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item
on June 21, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed General
Plan Amendment, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council
approve the proposal to change the General Plan Circulation Element roadway
classification for La Strada Road from "Major" to "Modified Secondary." Pursuant to
Section 21080(c)(2) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning
Commission finds and determines that the Initial Study for Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 2005-01 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of
CEQA which analyzes environmental effects of the proposed project.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the
City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of General
Plan Amendment No. 2005-O1 have been made as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 60
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-O1
JUNE 21, 2005
PAGE 2 OF 3
1. The proposed amendment will not be (1) detrimental to the health, safety,
comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the
neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, (2) injurious to
property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City.
a. The design of La Strada Road is based upon the Traffic Impact Analysis
prepared forthe La Strada project by Urban Crossroads dated February 7,
2005. The findings of this study are supported by other traffic studies and
documents compiled for roadways and projects in the surrounding
vicinity, including the proposed Camino de] Norte project, anticipated to
connect to La Strada Road from the south.
2. The proposed amendment will be consistent with the latest General Plan.
a. Development in the vicinity of this project have been resubmitted or
approved with reduced densities, such as the east portion of the Ramsgate
Specific Plan, and the north portion of the Tuscany Hills Specific Plan.
The overall reduction in vehicle trips can be accommodated by the
proposed La Strada Road.
b. Development in the vicinity of this project have been affected by the
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Program (MSHCP). As an
example, the La Strada project is donating approximately 75.5 acres of
natural open space for conservation. The proposed La Strada Road
accommodates and enhances this effort towards conservation. The
construction of La Strada Road through the conservation area is a
"covered activity" within the MSHCP.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of
the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOa~V~f,A4~ND that the City Council af the
City of Lake Elsinore approve General Plan Amen ient~Io. 20,6;5~.
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 60
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-O1
JUNE 21, 2005
PAGE 3 OF 3
I hereby certify that the preceding Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission
at a meeting thereof conducted on June 21, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
A TTF CT•
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
Commissioners:
Commissioners
Commissioners:
LARIMER
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-61
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE CANYON CREEK SPECIFIC
PLAN NO. 85-1, LOCATED NORTHEAST OF
INTERSTATE 15, APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE WEST
OF CANYON LAKE, WEST OF SUMMERHILL DRIVE,
SOUTH OF GREENWALD, AND SOUTH OF THE
EXTENSION OF LA STRADA ROAD, ADJACENT TO THE
EXISTING TUSCANY HILLS COMMUNITY TO THE
EAST, (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 363-020-008).
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by La
Strada Partners, LLC to amend the Canyon Creek Specific Plan No. 85-1; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council
pertaining to changes to approved specific plans; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Deparhnent and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item
on June 21, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed
Amendment No. 3 to the Canyon Creek Specific Plan No. 85-1 prior to making a
decision to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed amendment. Pursuant
to Section 21080 (c)(2) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the
Planning Commission finds and determines that the Initial Study for Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 2005-01 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of
CEQA which analyzes environmental effects of the proposed project.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and
Chapter 17.99 (Specific Plan District) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code the following
findings for the approval of Amendment No. 3 to the Canyon Creek Specific Plan No.
85-1 have been made as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-61
A1VID NO. 3 TO CANYON CREEK SP 85-1
NNE 21, 2005
PAGE 2 OF 4
1. The locatiom and design of the proposed development is consistent with the goals
and policies of the City's General Plan and with any other applicable plan or
policies adopted by the City, or in the process of being prepared and adopted.
a. The Genera] Plan supports the development of the Canyon Creek Specific
Plan, which has been partially constructed. The proposed Amendment has
been reviewed and conditioned to enhance and update the original Specific
Plan.
b. The proposal has been designed to support the objectives of the Multi-
Species Habitat Conservation Plan recently adopted by the City, by donating
approximately 75.5 acres of natural open space within its boundaries that link
habitat to the north and southwest of the project site.
2. The proposed location allows the development to be well-integrated with or
adequately buffered from its surroundings, whichever may be the case.
a. The proposed Amendment integrates development of Planning Area 2 of the
Specific Plan with the existing community of Tuscany Hills, by extending a
vital roadway, by the provision of additional infrastructure facilities and by
introducing a unique, gated community of quality architecture, amenities,
landscaping and monumentation.
b. The proposed Amendment provides a buffer between the existing Tuscany
Hills community and the La Strada homes with the provision of landscaped
open space along its eastern boundary that ranges in width from nearly 100
feet to 350 feet.
3. All vehicular traffic generated by the development, either in phased increments or
at full build-out, is to be accommodated safely and without causing undue
congestion upon adjoining streets.
a. A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared for this project by Urban Crossroads
dated February 7, 2005, and the project has been conditioned to implement
the recommendations set forth in the Analysis.
b. Furthermore, the City's Traffic Engineer has required that additional
circulation measwes be imposed upon the project.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-61
AMD NO. 3 TO CANYON CREEK SP 85-1
JiJNE 21, 2005
PAGE 3 OF 4
c. The project has been conditioned to utilize Greenwald and Bella Vista if
available as access for construction vehicles to avoid entering existing
Tuscany Hills neighborhoods.
d. The project has been conditioned to utilize Greenwald and Bella Vista if
available as access for conshuction vehicles to avoid entering existing
Tuscany Hills neighborhoods.
4. The Final Specific Plan shall identify a methodology to allow land uses to be
adequately serviced by existing or proposed public facilities and services.
a. The proposed Amendment has been review and conditioned to provide
adequate public services to the site.
b. The proposed Amendment provides a neighborhood park, pedestrian
pathways and a recreational facility for its residents.
5. The overall design of the Specific Plan shall produce an attractive, efficient and
stable development.
a. The proposed Amendment will allow the construction of compatible
residential units in a design that promotes neighborhood identity and "Great
Neighborhood" design concepts, such as outdoor rooms or courtyards,
offsetting garages, curb-separated sidewalks, cantilevered or recessed second
stories.
b. The proposed Amendment will provide recreational amenities and natural
open space for its residents.
6. In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), impacts have been reduced to a level of non-significance.
a. The Initial Study identified several significant environmental effects resulting
from implementation of the project. However, these significant effects can be
fully avoided/mitigated through the adoption of feasible mitigation measures.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-61
AMD NO. 3 TO CANYON CREEK SP 85-1
JUNE 21, 2005
PAGE 4 OF 4
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of
the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the
City of Lake Elsinore approve Amendment No. 3 to the anyon Creek Specific Plan No.
85-1, per attached Exhibit `E.'. rn\
Ron LaPere, Chairman ~
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at
a meeting thereof conducted on June 21, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
A. Brady, Secretary to~he Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-62
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 32077, A SUBDIVISION OF 134 RESIDENTIAL
LOTS, A NEIGABORHOOD PARK/ RECREATIONAL
FACILITY, WATER RESERVOIR AND BASIN SITES, AND
SEVEN (7) OPEN SPACE LOTS, ON APPROXIMATELY
140+ ACRES LOCATED NORTHEAST OF INTERSTATE 15,
APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE WEST OF CANYON LAKE,
WEST OF SUMMERHILL DRIVE, SOUTH OF
GREENWALD, AND SOUTH OF THE EXTENSION OF LA
STRADA ROAD, ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING
TUSCANY HILLS COMMU1vITY TO THE EAST, AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 363-020-008.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by La
Strada Partners, LLC to subdivide approximately 140± acres of unimproved property into
134 residential lots, a neighbarhood park/recreational facility, water reservoir and basin
' sites, and seven (7) open space lots; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council
pertaining to the subdivision of land; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item
on June 21, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed general
plan amendment, specific plan amendment and subdivision, prior to making a decision to
recommend that the City Council approve the proposal to subdivide approximately 140 +
acres into 134 residential lots, a neighborhood park/recreational facility, water reservoir
and basin sites, and seven (7) open space lots. Pursuant to Section 21080 (c)(2) of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning Commission finds and
determines that the Initial Study for Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-01 is
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 62
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32077
JUNE 21, 2005
PAGE 2 OF 4
adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA which analyzes
environmental effects of the proposed project.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State of California Subdivision Map Act,
and the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of
Tentative Tract Map No. 32077 have been made as follows:
1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and
improvements, is consistent with the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. The
proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses
and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5).
a. The design of the proposed subdivision and density of 1.04 dwelling units
per acre are consistent with the proposed Amendment No. 3 to the Canyon
Creek Specific Plan No. 85-1, and therefore with the General Plan.
b. The project proposes single family residential lots ranging in size from
5,000 square feet to 17,600 square feet, with an average lot size of 8,098
square feet. The originally approved Specific Plan called for estate lots in
this portion of the Plan. However, the project proposes to donate
approximately 75.5 acres of the site for conservation purposes, and has
designed a clustered, gated community on the balance of 64.5+ acres.
2. The site of the proposed division of land is physically suitable for the proposed
density of development in accordance with the General Plan.
a. The General Plan encourages clustered development in order to facilitate
the conservation of identified wildlife corridors and habitat. The project
density and design is compatible with existing, adjacent residences.
b. The map provides open space areas that protect the natural topography and
views.
3. The effects that this project are likely to have upon the housing needs of the
region, the public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and
environmental resources have been considered and balanced.
a. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan. During the approval
of City's General Plan, housing needs, public services and fiscal resources
were scrutinized to achieve a balance within the City.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 62
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32077
JUNE 21, 2005
PAGE 3 OF 4
b. The map has been conditioned to annex into Community Facilities District
2003-01 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on
public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City.
c. The map has been conditioned to annex into Lighting and Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of
the project on public right-of-way landscaped areas to be maintained by
the City, and for street lights in the public right-of-way for which the City
will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California
Edison.
4. The design of the proposed division of land or type of improvements are not likely
to cause serious public health problems.
a. Tentative Tract Map No. 32077 is conditioned to comply with all
development standards of proposed Amendment No. 3 to the Canyon
Creek Specific Plan. These standards have been prepared and reviewed to
benefit the public health, safety and welfare.
5. The design of the proposed division of land or the type of improvements will not
conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use
of property within the proposed division of land.
a. All known easements or requests for access have been incorporated into
Tentative Tract Map No. 32077.
b. The map has been circulated to City departments and outside agencies,
and appropriate conditions of approval have been applied for their
approval during construction.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of
the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMr~D that the City Council of the
City of Lake Elsinore approve Tentative Tract Map 3 77. ~\
Ron LaPcre, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 62
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32077
JUNE 21, 2005
PAGE 4 OF 4
I hereby certify that the preceding Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission
at a meeting thereof conducted on June 21, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
A. Brady, Secretary t~he Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF
FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH SECTION 6.0 OF
THE MiTLTIPLE SPECIES HABTTAT CONSERVATION
PLAN (MSHCP) FOR TAE PROJCT KNOWN AS
INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-04 TO BE
LOCATED AT 32081 CORYDON STREET (APN 370-080-
017 & 018)
WHEREAS, a site specific focused survey (Habitat Assessment Report) for the Burrowing
Owl, Cxiteria Area Species, and Narrow Endemic Plan Species was required bythe Multiple Species
Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHQ') for the purpose of allowing development of an industrial
building and associated improvemenu; and
WIIEREAS, the City of I.ake Elsinore evaluated the consistency of the project with the
MSHQ'; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plaeuiuig Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on June 21, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Plaiuiing Conuivssion of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of makuig recommendation to the Ciry Council adopting the Findings of
Consistency with the MSHCP; and
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Conunission of the City of I.ake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
The Habitat Assessment Report prepared by has been prepared by Principe and Associates,
submitted and reviewed in accordance with requiremenu of the Multiple Species Habitat
Conservadon Plan (MSHQ'). The report is complete and adequate in it's evaluation of all
environmental effects of the project known as Industrial Design Review No. 200404 and will
not preclude the implementation of the MSHQ' goals, based on the following finding:
FINDINGS - Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
1. The proposed project is consistent with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
Am~rding to tlae Multiple Sp~ia Hcrbitat Conseruuion Plan (MSHCPJ, a Habixat Assess~rern Report sl.all
l~ re~rriral to addmss tlae pare~uial habitat for the Burrarring Ocv~ Criteria Ama Spazes, and Narrurr~E~xlenac
Plaru Sp~rzes. SiYxe tlae Habitat Assessrreru Re~icm datal April 7, 2005 foeaad rro euder.re to support herbixat
far the Burrarei~ Ore~ Criteria A~ra Sp~eia or NanvcvErderrsc Plaau Spa~s, fidrzre fazss studies are ~
~~
RESOLUITONNo. 2005- 63
June 21, 2005
Page 2 of 2
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Finding, the Piaiuiing Conunission of the City of
Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMIVIEND that ty Council of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore
adopt the Finding of Consistencywith the Multiple Sp cies itat Conservation Plan.
Lake Elsinore Planning Coiiunission
I herebycertifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Planniug Cominission at a meeting
thereof conduaed on June 21, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Coirunissioneis: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
NOES: Comnvssioners:
ABSENT: Coimnissionexs: LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Coiiuivssioners:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~, ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-41
FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-04, TO BE
LOCATED AT 32081 CORYDON STREET- APN 370-080-017
& 018
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Ciry of Lake Elsinore by Peter De La
Torre of R/D Construction to request approval of Conditional Use Pemzit No. 200441 for
Industrial Design Review No. 2004-04 pursuant to Section 7.5.S.b of the Liberry Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Pluuiuig Cominission
has considered evidence presented by the Communiry Development Deparunent and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on June 21, 2005; and
WI IEREAS, the Plun~iiig Cominission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Permiu.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Conunission of the Ciry of lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plaunuig Commission has considered the request for approval of Conditional
Use Pexmit No. 2004-41 for Industrial Design Review No. 2004-04. The Planning Conunission
finds and deterniines this project is consistent with the General Plan and Liberty Specific Plan. The
proposed project has been determined to be exempt from the requirements of the California
Envirorunental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15162, Subsequent EIRS and Negative
Declarations. An Environxnental Impact Report was certified by the City Council for the East Lake
Specific Plan on . A Habitat Assessment Report dated April 7, 2005 has been prepared
pursuant of the requirement of the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan.
SECT'ION 2. That in accordance with Section 7.5.56, Uses pemutted subject to a
Conditional Use Pem~it, of the Liberty Specific Plan the following findings for the approval of the
Conditional Use Pernut have been made as follows:
FINDINGS - Conditional Use Pernut No. 2004-41
1. The proposed use, on iu own meriu and within the context of iu setting, is in accord with the
objectives of the General Plan and the Liberty Specific Plan in which the site is located.
RESOLUTTON NO. 2005-64
! JLJNE 21, 2005
' Page 3 of 3
6. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 9.2 Subsequent Development Entitlemenu of
the Liberty Specific Plan including guarautees and evidence of compliance with conditions have
been incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Permit to insure development of the
propertyin accordance with the objectives Section 9.2.2.
Pursuarn w Sation 9.2.2, Corelitional Use Per~rd~ ~'tlae Lilz~zy Spaifu Plan the proposea' Cor,a''uiorxrl Use
Penrrzt assaiata~ to Irxlustricrl Desigre ReziEw Na 2004-04 l~xatxl at 32081 Car~don St~2 bas Jx~z
sdaali+lal for anaic%racior~ ar,el approurl ~tlaePlanrri~ Corra~assion
NOW, TF3EREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plannuig Conm~ission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Conditional Use Pernut No. 200441.
Ron LaP re, Cha~+,»a„
Lake ELsinore Plaiuiuig Conmrission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plannuig Coinmission at a meeting
thereof conducted on June 21, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
~~~~
Coirunissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
Comnvssioners:
Conuiussionexs: LARIMER
Comnvssionexs:
RESOLUITON NO. 2005-64
JLTNE 21, 2005
Page 2 of 3
In orzler to ad~iece a zaal lazlarxct~ aml fimetional rrax ~ n~sidemic~ ammrerva~ i~lztstria~ o[~ere spuc~
ramational arnl i~ztitzrc'~onal la~xl uses, staff'has thororsglily eurlt~atal the larad aae mrrg~atibilit~ ~is~ trufficcrml
arl~- erctironrretttal hazards re'atal to tlae propcual Cor.ditional Use Pernat pursyam to the ~quire»errts ~tlae
L i(z~ty Sp~cPlan lcrate l at 32081 Crnydrni Str~t Aaordi~y~ the pmjwsal lared z~se is in caa¢trrerxe zaith
th~e abjatizes ~'tl.~ Ger~ral Planared Sp~eifuPlan in zaliid~ the site IcrataL
2. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safery, coxnfort, or general
welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City,
or injurious to property or improvemenu in the neighborhood of the Ciry.
In acmrzl7cith Sazion 7.S.S.b ~'tl~ Lil~rty Sp~ifu Plan the City ~raliza~ tlxu tlae propasal irxliutrial zae
lcratfel at 32081 Crnyrlon Stn~t mzy Jaaze a parerrtial to ~~gztiza'y in~act the zeelfare ~persrnzs rsiding or
zeorki~ zezrhin tlae n~igh&~r~iaal ar tl.~ Czt~c Considerir~ this, sraff lxrs substarniata~l tlaat all appli~'e City
Deparc~rerns aml Aberxies l~ze Jx~rc affor~al tlae c~porcunity far a thoroetgh reaece~ gf tJae use arxl heaze
imorporatal all applicable m»vrents aral/or mr,d'uions mlatal to irc,tallat'~on a~acl mzr.ruenarxe ~'layeLsrapir~
str~t da~'uations, ~zgulcrtiorts ~poirrts ~'~ce'~icular ingress ared ~s a~xl mra~u~ ~pa~entral mrisa~, so as to
eli~ranate ayry neg~tize irr~ads to tlae ~ral health, sa}~et~ ~rn5 or ~aeral -caFlfare ~ the surr~ir~g
~i~ila~rlioal or the Cit}~
3. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for
all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffexs and other features required by the
LibertySpecific Plan.
7?ae propose~ use lcratal at 32081 Cor}rlorc St~t Tx~s l~z d~igr,~l in cmaideration ~the size a~zl shape ~the
Inopercys therel'Y stmngthe~ri~ a~acl erd~anaazg tlae inm~liate i~est~ial ama Furtlaer, the prrojat as proposal zvill
a~lerrent tlae qual'uY ~exzsting de~p»~u and ~rill create a zisually pleasin~ rron-d~-adize ra'acionship
l~[ze~n tlae prapasa~arxl eeistingprojazs.
4. That the site for the proposed use relates to streeu and highways with proper design both as to
width and type of pavement to carrythe type and quantiryof traffic generated bythe subject use.
71ae prvposez' use la~ztal at 32081 Carydan Strt~t lxu l~z reaereEd as to iu mlation to tlae ~eidth aml ty[re ~
paze~r,eru n~lxl to curry tlae tyPe a~xl Ruaruuy ~n"affu ~'uta~ in thut the City lzas ada3uata'y eurl~ata~ tlae
po~ernial a~ucts assaiata~ zeith thzpro~ase~ use j»irn- to its approzul ard bas mr,elixior~el the projsx to lx sercxl
b}'roads ~ade~ate capacrty and designstam(arcls to prozide masonable aa~s by rar, t~zrc~Z, transi~ ared bicyrfe
5. In approving the subjea use located at 32081 Corydon Street there will be no advexse affea on
abutting property on the pemutted and nom~al use thereof.
Tl~ prapasal use Ixrs l~z tbanxs~ily rezieraal and mreditior,~l by all applical~e City De~artrrems ayxl a.uside
AB~~ elzmnann8 thePo~u~al.frn'arryaYxl all adze~se ~'axs on tlae abu~inBProP~1i
RESOLLTTION NO. 2005-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-04, TO BE
LOCATED AT 32081 CORYDON STREET- APN 370-080-
017 & 018
WF3EREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Peter De La
Torre of R/D Construction to request approval of Industrial Design Review No. 2004-04 for an
indusuial building and associated improvemenu; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Pluuung Coinmission
has considered evidence presented by the Communiry Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to tlvs item on June 21, 2005; and
WI-IEREAS, the Plannuig Commission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of recommending approval of industrial projects to City Council.
NOW THEREFORE, the Plamung Comnvssion of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECI'ION 1. The Planiiuig Conunission has considered the proposed design for the
industrial building and associated improvemenu. The Plaiuiing Commission finds and deternunes
this projea is consistent with the General Plan and the Liberty Specific Plan. The project has been
detern~ined to be exempt from the Califomia Environmental Qualiry Act (CEQA) pursuant to
Section 15162 and found to be acceptable pursuant to the requiremenu of the Multiple Species
Habitat Conservation Plan;
SECTION,2. That in accordance with Section 9.2.3 of the Liberty Specific Plan the
following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and
Liberty Specific Plan in which the project is located.
7be proptaallradustrial Daign Reziermlcrate~ at 32081 Crn~darz Stn~t cur~ilies -ceith the geerls and objatizes ~'
tlae Ger~-al Plan arxl LiFx~ty Spazf c Pla~ in tbat the approuzl gF'tlaese iredifftrial busi~s park will asszst in
adneun8 zn de~e!°Pr~u ~a ~cee'l-bzlane~l arxl fi~wnal ~rax ~r~iderrtia~ mnvre+rrcr~ iaa~str'w~ ~ere sPac~
rar~ational aml instinrtiorral la~xl uses as zeell as eaa~eraging ireclttstriul la~ad use to dizersi~y Lake Elsi~zo~z's
anr~rrac bzse
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in the Liberry Specific Plan.
The jrropas~l Industrial Dgign Rezierv lcratal at 32081 Crn~don Scra~ is apprvpriate to tJae site and
surrr~urelir~g d~ in that the ~rropas~rl irxfustsial busi~ss park l~as Ix~rz desigr,e~l in cmaideration ~'the
size ami shape ~'the ProP~7s ~Y ~~8 irnzmst aml ztt~ying zistas as a pe~son ~ along tl~ st~t
Furtlaer tl,~ pmjat as propasal zeill aar~lzm~nt tlae qHaluY ~'eezstzn8 clecelopnsent ared ~ceill cmate a usz~ally
pleasiny noro-det~-acti2e rrlatirnalrip l~cen tlae p~v/xsa~ arxl eristing projaxs in tlxn tlae amlrixazural desigr~
az~orarxl rrttte~ials amisixe design pro~sal eaderKea mrxenz farqual'uyarad ari%i~rlit~c
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-65
JiJNE 21, 2005
Page 2 of 2
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed projea is not anticipated to resuk
in anysignificant advexse environmental impacts.
Pursuaru to tlae California Er~i~nmrernal Qital'uyA d(CEQA), tl,~prcrp~aallrxlicstriulDaignReciecvlcratal
at 32081 Crnydori Stra~ as !~z retierecel ared mnd'uior.~ by all appli~able G'ry Dizzsions ayel Departrrerrts
and Agena~~ CIYK~'WIl YKX I7ClZC CL Stgnifuarn effa2 on the errciror•mxrnal pursuarn to tlae Habixat Assess~rem
Report ~Apnl7, 2005.
4. Conditions and safegt~ards pursuant to Section 9.2 Subsequent Development Entidemenu of
the Liberty Specific Plan including guaz~antees and evidence of compliance with conditions have
been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to insure development of the property
in accordance with the objectives Section 9.2.
Puisr~arn w Satiora 9.2.3, Design Rezieca~ ~'the L iFz~ty Spaifu Plan th~e propnsez' Iralustrial Design Reuc~
loratErl at 32081 Cor~don St~ has Ix~re sdaau~lelforcrnzsidei-atio~z ayel appmwl ~tlaeP/a~nang Crnrnre'ssion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plaiuring Conunission of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOlVIMEND TO TI-IE QTY COLJNQL APPROVAL of
Industrial Design Review No. 200404.
Ron LaPere, Chairinan
Lake ELsinore Planning Coimivssion
I hereby cettify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plazuiuig Comcnission at a meeting
thereof conducted on June 21, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
NOES: Cominissioners:
ABSENT: Comnvssioners:
LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Coimiussioners:
ATTES :
Roben A. Brady, Secret to the Planning Conmvssion
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-66
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 33635 FOR BROOKSIDE
TERRACE A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX
TO BE LOCATED WITHIN PLANNING AREA 5 OF THE
CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Dan Mallec,
Rick Engineering to request the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No.33635 for the
establishment of a residential condominium community; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of recommending approval of Tentative Parcel Maps for residential
projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on June 21, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for
Tentative Parcel Map No. 33635 and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds
and determines that this project is consistent with Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code (LEMG~, Section(s~ 66424 and 66427 of the California Subdivision Map Act
(CSMA), the Canyon H'ills Specific Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and that no further
environmental review is necessary pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), Section 15162.;
SECTION 2. That in accordance with the Section(s) 66424 and 66427 of the California
Subdivision Map Act (CSMA) and Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code (LEMC), the following findings for the approval of the condominium map has been made
as follows:
FINDINGS - CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION
The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is
consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the
objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan
(Government Code Section 66473.5).
The project as designed assists in achieving the development of a well-balanced and
functional miz of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 33635
PAGE 2 OF 3
institutional land uses (GOAL 1.0, Land Use Element) as well provide decent housing
opportunities and a satisfying living environment for residents of Lake Elsinore (GOAL
1.0, HousingElement)
2. The effects this project is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the public
service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources
have been considered and balanced.
Considering the effects this project is likely to have upon the needs of the region a
condition of approval was implemented which would require the applicant to enter into
an agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore, providing
15% of the units in the project as affordable housing units in accordance with the
requirements ofSection 33413(b) ofthe California Community Redevelopment Law or an
alternative equivalent action which may include (without limitation) dedication of vacant
land, construction of affordable units on another site, or payment of an in lieu fee
calculated to provide sufficient funds to underwrite the long-term affordability of an
equivalent number of affordable dwelling units constructed or substantially rehabilitated
on other sites within the City's redevelopment project areas.
3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to
resuit in any significant environmental impact.
The project has been adequately conditioned by all applicable departments and agencies
and will not therefore result in any significant environmental impacts.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COiJNCIL APPROVAL of a
Tentative Parcel Map No. 33635.
Ron LaPLre, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on June 21, 2005 by the following vote:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 33635
PAGE 2 OF 3
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
LARIMER
A. Brady, Secretary~b the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-67
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-23 FOR THE
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF
`BROOKSIDE TERRACE" A RESIDENTIAL
CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX, TO BE LOCATED WITHIN
PLANNING AREA 5 OF THE CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC
PLAN
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Dan Mallec,
Rick Engineering, to request the approval of Residential Design Review No. 2004-23 for the
design, construction and establishment of a residential condominium community; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of recommending approval of Design Reviews for residential projects;
and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on June 21, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for
Residential Design Review No. 2004-23 and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission
finds and determines that this project is consistent with the Canyon Hills Specific Plan, and the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and that no further environmental review is necessary
pursuant to the California Environmenta] Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15162.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings for the project have been made as follows:
FINDINGS - DESIGN REVIEW
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and
the Zoning District in which the project is located.
Tlae p%anal Rgideraial Design Revecv crnrq~li~ zeifl~ the gcwls a~xl a5jarizes ~the Ger.~ral Plar~ in thax
tlae appmurl ~this Condo»aniumCrnrnn.mity zaill ussist in ad~iecing tlae deca'o~rern ~a zeell-bxla~l a~xl
fia~ronal rra~ ~~esidernia~ mrrarenia~ i~ustric~ oPerz spac~ ~eatiorwl a~' i~atitzrtional la~ad us~ as
~aell as erec~raging iyrJiutrial larel uses to dizenify Lake Elsinrne's aror~c• &ase
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-67
PAGE NO. 2
7~ae pmpasal Reidential Dgign Reuerr~ zs appropriate to the site ayel surrwarli~ d~ in tlaat the
Cord4rra~aiumprojax has Ixe~z desigr,~l in crnaideratzon ~tl~ size ared shape ~theP~ls t~Y ~n8
iruerest arel attrying zistcrs as a pe~son ymcg alor~ the stra~ Further the projaz as proposal zeill cprrq~lem~n
the q~al'uY ~'eristing decelo~»rer¢ a~xl zeill cmate a zisually plazsin~ nrnz-cl~r-actize ~rlationship l~tze~n th~e
prapase~ arxl eeisting projftxs in tlxrt the a~ural desigrg cdrn aaxl mzterials a~acl site desig~z proposal
eziclerKe a mraem forqual~uyar~l ori8c~rizryi
3. Subjea to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to
result in any significant adveise environmental impacts.
Pursuarn to tbe ridifor•rria Ercziro~vrpntal Qual'riy Act (CEQA), the prn~insa~ Resuleraral Design Reiiecv
as n~cieuaz'a~acl cmxfi.tiorx~ by all appliral~e CiLy Divsirna ar~l De~iaartm~ts aredA~eneia, zeiJl n~ laaee a
sigrrifrcaru ~t on th~e e~zcirsm»~m pursHar2 to attadral CoradiZions ~'Approuzd
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guaiantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with
the objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Punz~arn to Sa2ion 17.82.070 (Adio~z gfthePlanning Crn~a~nssion) ~the LakeElsia7rneMzandpal Cale
(LEMCJ, th~e propasal Residernial Desigrz Reaiecvlxrs /~re sd~di~lal far cmaszcleratiwz arxl apprvwl gf the
Pla~vn~ Convrassion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL of a
Residential Design Review No. 2004-23.
~N
Ron L e , Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on June 21, 2005 by the following vote:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-67
PAGE NO. 3
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN
ATTEST:
~
Ro rt A.Brady,`.
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
LARIMER
the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-68
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-08
FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ~~BROOKSIDE
TERRACE" A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM
COMPLEX, TO BE LOCATED WITHIN PLANNING AREA
5 OF THE CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Dan Mallec,
Rick Engineering, to request the approval of Conditional Use Permit 2005-08, for the
establishment of a residential condominium community; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Permits for residential projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Deparhnent
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on June 21, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for
Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-08 and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission
finds and determines that this project is consistent with the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and that no further environmental review is necessary
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15162.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) the following findings for the project have been made as
follows:
FINDINGS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
1. The proposed use, on its own meriu and within the conte~rt of iu setting, is in accord with
the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the pluuiuig district in which the site
is located.
In order to ad~iere a~zell lazla~l a~xl fiaact~ional rrax ~~esidernia~ amvrereia~ iydztstria~ oPeri spac~
r~ational arad ir~stituCional la~xl uses, staff'laa.s tlaoraughly eurlr~atxl tlae larxl use corrq~atibility~ r.~is~ traffu
ar~l atlaer er~rironm~ual laazaYds ra'atal to the pro~xisal Corxlztional Use Peyrrat far a Corxlonamirm
C'onv~amiryc Aaorr(in~~ tlae propasal (arxl use is in a~xurrerxe zeitli tlae ahj~ti-ces ~tlae ~'~ere~-al Plan arzl
tlae purpase ~'tl,~ planningdzstrirt in ~eliidi tlaesite zs loratxl
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-68
PAGE NO. 2
2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safery, comfort, or general
welfaze of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the
City, or injurious to property or unprovemenu in the neighborhood or the Ciry.
In aczrnd ~aixh the purpases ~'tl.~ CYaapter 17.74 (Conditronal Use Pemrits) ~th~e Lake Elsirrore
Muruapal Cal~ tlae C'uy rralizaz~ tJxtt tl~ propcua~ mr,a'orranium use mry lazze a P~~ ~~'~Y
i~act tlae zea'fam ~pe~srna r~sidzng ar zeor{zing zeitbin the n~i~ilx~rl~axl or th~e C'u~t Caaidering this, stuff
Ixrs sz~bstarrtiatal tlaat all appli~e C'uyDepamr~mts ar,dA~erxis haze lx~n affrnzlal th~e oppo~turdty fora
tlrorat~i reiiece~ ~' tl.~ use arad haze i~nr~wratal all appli~e mrrurerns ayeUor mrslitirna relatal to
i~atallat'wn and rraimerurme ~'la~xlsrapi~ str~t d~uatiors, r~gulatzo~a ~Points ~'zdiitr~lar ingress ayel
Egress arxl mntral ~pareruial masa~, so as m eliarinate a~zy ~ize irrpacu to tlae ger.e~-al laPalth, saf~
~rr~or5 or~ral zeelfare ~'thesurr~crrding r,~i~i&~~xxrl ar the Cizy~
3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for
all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffeis and other features required by
Tide 17 of the LEMC.
7Tae pro[rasa~ crnalonanium use has E~z deigr~l in crnaideration ~ tlae size arxl shape ~ tlae prnpe~t~
tbereby strer~gthernn8 ared a~l,e~rxirg tlae i~ror,Fefiate iredushial area. Furtl~r, the projat as pmpasa~ zeill
crnr~lerr,errt th~e qual ~uy ~eeisting der~prrent a~zl7eill crrate a zisually plzasing yeon-de~ractize mlationship
l~ce~n the p~vpasal aml eeisting projats, in tlaat tlae starage area l~as Ixt~z reciece~l to eraure ade~z~ate
prozision ~'scr~erung from rhe pub~'u ri~s-~zuzY ~"~I~I~Percia•
4. The site for the proposed use relates to streeu and highways with proper design both as to
width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject
use.
Tlae pmpasal cnrxlorraniirrn use Ixrs l~rt reziezea~ as to its mlation to the zeidtFi arxl type ~paierrer~t r~led
to rarry tlae ty~e and qyarnzt~' ~ n"af~ic ~"ata~ in tlaat tlae C':ty lxrs ada~~ately ecttluatal tlae pareruiul
i~r¢'iacu assaiatal zeiwxh tlae propasa~ w.rtdaorstora~ prior to its apprrourl ars:l has amdizior,~l tlae projat to (~
serrttl bY ~ds ~adc~~at~ caPacuY aaacl desigra stamlanls to prozide yaasonal~le aaess by ozr, t~zro~i, trttrsi~
ared bicyrle
5. In approving the subject use there will be no advexse affect on abutting propexty or the
pemutted and nom~al use thereof.
71~e prnpasaz' use has J~z tl~ornzc~ily reuezv~l aml a~r.dixior~l by all up,olirable C'tty Departmrm ayel
a.usideASerxzes, ela~rd~ti'~8 tlae po¢eru~al.fora~zyayelall adzerse effaxs on tlae abr~ttinBPmP~~
6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.74.50 of the LEMC have been
incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Permit to insure that the use
continues in a manner envisioned by these findings for the term of the use.
Pursz~arn to S~ziore 17.74.050 (Adion ~'th~e PlarnTang C',orrmassiorr~ ~th~e Lake ElsirroreMaaricipal Cale
(LEMC), tl.~ Caredit~orrrl Use Pe»ret for a~nium use hcrs Ixaz sdaa2'~lal for mrsideration a~xl
aPProurl ~ttlae Planning Coirn~a'ssion
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-68
PAGE NO. 3
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Fin ' s, the Pla ing Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Cond' ional se e it o. 2005-08.
Ron Lape Chai an
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on June 21, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
Robeyf A. Brady, Secretary to the~ianning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-69
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF ZONE
CHANGE (PRE-ZONE) NO. 2005-OS TO CHANGE THE
ZONING DESIGNATION OF THE PARCELS
SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS (APN(S) 391-170-005, 007,
391-200-003, 004, 007, 391-230-002, 003, 004, 005, 007, 009,
010, 390-130-006, 015, 016, 020, 021, 024, 390-160-001, 002,
Oll, 012, 391-240-O11, 012, 391-240-001, 390-170-001, 391-260-
001, 389-020-032, 390-190-O11, 012, 013, 389-080-037, and 389-
020-036 TO M-3 MINERAL RESOURCES AND RELATED
MANUFACTURING SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OF THE
ANNEXATION NO. 72.
WHEREAS, an application, authorized by David H. Murdock and Pacific Clay Products
(Property owners), has been filed by The City of Lake Elsinore to change the Zoning
Designation of the parcels described as APN(s) 391-170-005, 007, 391-200-003, 004, 007, 391-
230-002, 003, 004, 005, 007, 009, 010, 390-130-006, 015, 016, 020; 021, 024, 390-160-001, 002,
011, 012, 391-240-011, 012, 391-240-001, 390-170-001, 391-260-001, 389-020-032, 390-190-
011, 012, 013, 389-080-037, and 389-020-036 M-3 Mineral Resources and Related
Manufacturing District subject to the completion of Annexation No. 72; and
WHEREAS, The City of Lake Elsinore, in conjunction with the Property owners, has
submitted an additional application for Annexation No. 72, which is located adjacent to the City
of Lake Elsinore's northern border and is within the City's Sphere of Influence and
unincorporated boundaries of County of Riverside subject to the completion of Annexation No.
72; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for changes to the
approved Zoning Map;and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Deparhnent
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on June 21, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Pre-Zone Change
No. 2005-05, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the
U:\rpreisendanz\Annexation No. 72 Pacific Clay\PC RESO CZ .doc
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-OS
Page 2 of 3
proposed amendment to the Zoning Map. The Planning Commission finds that CEQA
Categorical Exemption is complete and adequate and provides appropriate environmental
documentation for the project and fully complies with the requirements of CEQA, the State
CEQA Guidelines, and the City's environmental clearance procedures.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approva] of Zone Change No. 2005-OS have been
made as follows:
1. The proposed zone change will not be; a) detrimental to the health, safery, comfort or
general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed
amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvemenu in the
neighborhood or within the Ciry.
77ae propase~ Zor,~ CYaa~e Ixrs Ix~n ar~rly~a~ relatize to its pare~~ial~uy to l~ delrim~rttal to tl~ hpalth,
safety, ~ort arxl ~cerlfare gF tlae persorcc rosiding or ~eorki~ ~eithin tlae n~ighbmhad ~ tlae pmpasal
arrerxlrrerr~ Tlae priyrtt~y issue iderrtifial by staff mlates to tlae l~alth ared safetY ~'tlae p~ersores ~esiding or
zeor~Zing 7arxhin tlae r~ighJa~rhoaa' ~'the e~isting la~xl use Staff'mr~a'ude~' &zsal on the Pro~Trg Saf~Y
r~r~s, tlaat the hpalth a~xl sa}~etY ~the persrna Yesiding or zevrking zeithin tlae r~ighlxr~~ ~tlae p%oerty
zezll not l~ cl~n-adal as a~ault ~this pmjat upon ozr~letio~z ~tlaea~at'wn
2. The proposed action will be consistent with the Goals, Objeaives, and Policies of the
General Plan and the development standards established with the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code (LEMG~.
Basal on its anal~sis, staff has mra~ucla~l tlxrt the ~ueste~ Zar~ dxi~ alloraing tlae anr,e~azion ~'tl~e
subjs2 p~vperty as M-3, is crnazstem zeith GOAL 1.0 g<'tlae Ger,~-al Plan in that this P~Zo~ring uill
assist in ad~ierzng the deca'op~reiu ~'a zedl-&zlama~ a~xl fia~'ronal nax ~'raidernfa~ cvnvrenzal arxl by
er.ev~-agi~ tlae ir,rlusion yFi~diatrial la~xl r~se zeithin the C'uy Erxrreduries.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve Pre-Zone Change No.2005-OS subject to the completion of Annexation No. 72.
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on June 21, 2005 by the following vote:
U:\rpreisendanz\Annexation No. 72 Pacific Clay\PC RESO GZ .doc
PLANIVING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-OS
Page 3 of 3
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
A. Brady, Secre~a~+ to the
U:\rpreisendanz\Annexation No. 72 Pacific C1ay\PC RESO CZ .doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-70
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE
COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX THE
TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS ANNEXATION 72 (APN(S)
391-170-005, 007, 391-200-003, 004, 007, 391-230-002, 003, 004,
005, 007, 009, 010, 390-130-006, 015, 016, 020, 021, 024, 390-
160-001, 002, Oll, 012, 391-240-O11, 012, 391-240-001, 390-170-
001, 391-260-001, 389-020-032, 390-190-O11, 012, 013, 389-080-
037, and 389-020-036 INTO THE CORPORATE
BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE.
WHEREAS, an application, authorized by David H. Murdock and Pacific Clay Products
(Property owners), has been filed by The City of Lake Elsinore for the annexing of certain
properties described as APN(s) 391-170-005, 007, 391-200-003, 004, 007, 391-230-002, 003,
004, 005, 007, 009, 010, 390-130-006, 015, 016, 020, 021, 024, 390-160-001, 002, 011, 012,
391-240-011, 012, 391-240-001, 390-170-001, 391-260-001, 389-020-032, 390-190-011, 012,
013, 389-080-037, and 389-020-036 (Approximately 1,369 acres) into the corporate boundaries
of the City of Lake Elsinore; and
WHEREAS, this proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local
Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (Government Code Section 56000-56001); and
WHEREAS, The City of Lake Elsinore has submitted an additional application for Zone
Change No. 2005-05, and is located within the City's Sphere of Influence and unincorporated
boundaries of County of Riverside; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for annexations; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Deparhnent
and other interested parties at a public hearing with respect to this item on June 21, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the request for the annexation
(Annexation No. 72), prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council commence
proceedings to annex the subject territory. The Planning Commission finds that a CEQA
Exemption is adequate and provides the appropriate environmental documentation for the project
and fully complies with the requirements of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's
environmental clearance procedures.
U:\rpreisendanz\Annexation No. 72 Pacific C1ay\PC RESO Amuiexation .doc
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION FOR
ANNEXATION NO. 72
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 2. That in accordance with the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985, Government Code Section 57082 and the City of Lake Elsinore the
following findings for the approval of Annexation No. 72 have been made as follows:
1. The proposed anneacation area is contiguous to the Ciry of I.ake Elsinore and will not create
pockeu or islands.
71ae propcxal arn,eeatirnz ama &~rzlen tlae City ~Lake Elsi~aore aaad is ~aithin tlae C'uy's Sph~re ~
I~zrenee A masanable eeteiaion ~the aty ~xrrdary ar~s in tl.iat the a~eatiaz ~tl.~ prv,basa~ pa~els
~zll nat crezte ayrypoc~~s rn islurads.
2. The proposed annexation will not result in any advexse significant impacu on the
environment.
T~ Pro1~ ~~' ~" a Cali~omia Er~imnrrental Qiral'uy Ad (CEQA) exerrq~tiory as th~ere are ne
masonably frns~crF,~e crnaa~arerxes ~'tlae propcsal ap[»vuzL Tl.~ px~az zeill ~ lxcce a sigrufuarn ~'at on
the eizrirormz~rt arad is cmaistern zeitl~ the City's adoptez' Ger.~ral Plan
3. The proposed annexation will eliminate an e~usting undesired pocket of the county area.
77ae propasal a~v~eatio~z a»aists ~the rem~url gF1,374 acxs from tlae Co~nuy ~Rieerside's jurisdiction
ayxl placerrern ~'the saare irno tlae dzy linau ~'Lake Elsirrora Tlae a~eacio~z is F,~ing znit'uual by tlae
C'uy ~Lake Elsirror~ zvth tJae p~vper~j~ arer~'s co~peratirny a~xl as szuh zs crnaider~el an unmraeszxl
am~eution pursz~arn to the Rize~side L oral A~ney Forrrtttion Crnrnression (LAFC17) r~gulatio~a.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore commence proceedings for Annexation No. 72.
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on June 21, 2005 by the following vote:
U:\rpreisendanz\Annexation No. 72 Pacific C1ay\PC RESO Aiuuiexation .doc
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION FOR
ANNEXATION NO. 72
Page 3 of 3
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
A. Brady, Secretary/~bthe
ie Commission I~
U\rpreisendanz\Annexation No. 72 Pacific Clay\PC RESO Annnexation .doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-74
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 29360 KALINA
AVENUE, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S) 378-233-004 &
-005.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Jim Wilson,
requesting Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of approving a Minor Design Review for Single Family Residences; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Deparhnent
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on July 5, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for a
Minor Design Review for a Single Family Residence and has found it acceptable. The Planning
Commission finds and determines that this project is consistent with Chapter 17.23 (R-1 Single-
Family Residential District) of the Lake Elsinore Municipa] Code and that this action is exempt
from the requirements of the California Environmentai Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section
15303;
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and
the Zoning District in which the project is ]ocated.
The proposed Minor Design Review located at 29360 Kalina Avenue complies with the goals
and objectives of the General Plan, in that the approval of this single family residence will
assist in achieving the development of a well-balanced and functional mir of residential,
commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses as well as
encouraging the development and maintenance of a broad range of housing rypes for all
income groups and age categories.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-
PAGE NO. 2
The proposed Minor Design Review located at 29360 Kalina Avenue is appropriate to the
site and surrounding developments in that the single family home has been incorporated into
the topography of the property, creating interest and varying vistas as a person moves along
the street. Further the project as proposed will complement as well as exceed the quality of
existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between
the proposed and existing projects in that the architectural design, color and materials
proposed exceeds the size and design of the homes in the surrounding area.
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to
result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed Minor Design
Review located at 29360 Kalina Avenue, as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City
Divisions and Departments and Agencies, will not have a significant effect on the
environment pursuant to Article 19 (Categorical Exemptions) and Section 15303 (New
Construction or Conversion ofSmall Structures).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuant to Section 17.82.100 (Minor Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
(LEMC), the proposed Minor Design Review Zocated at 29360 Kalina Avenue has been
scheduled and considered for approval by the Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE of the Minor Design Review for a Single-Family
Residence located at 29360 Kalina Avenue.
U:\Jreiner\MDR SFR 29360 Kalina Ave\PC RESO Minor Design Review.doc
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-
PAGE NO. 3
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on July 5, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
~
the P1an~inQ Commission
U:\Jreiner\MDR SFR 29360 Kalina Ave\PC RESO Minor Design Review.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-75
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 2005-OS FOR A REDUCTION
IN FRONT AND REAR YARD REQUIREMENTS FOR A
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED ON ASSESSOR
PARCEL NUMBER(S) 378-233-004 & -005.
WHEREAS, Jim Wilson initiated proceedings for the approval of Variance No. 2005-OS
for a Single Family Residence; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of approving Variances; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on July 5, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Variance No.
2005-OS prior to approvai. The Planning Commission finds and determines that this project is
consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the California Subdivision Map Act and
that no further environmental review is necessary pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects):
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Variance No. 2005-OS has been made as
follows:
1. That adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.76.050 have been
incorporated into the approval of the Variance to insure development of the property in
accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in
which the site is located;
Pun~arn to Sation 17.76.050 (Actiore ~tlae Pla~ri~ Corrmassion~ ~the Lake ELsinrneMurriapcd Gxle
(LEMC), the propasal zttriarxe graruinga fize foo¢ (S J da~rase in tlae from a~xl ~rar~arrl set&aois Icrataz'
at Assessor Parm' Nzrrr~rs 378•233-004 and -OOS laas lxt~z sd~alylEel for mnsideration aml apprrou:l ~
thePlamring Crnrnrdssian
2. That there are special circumstances, pursuant to the purpose of this Chapter, applicable
to the subject properiy which do apply generally to other properties in the neighborhood,
and, therefore, granting of the Variance shall not constitute a grant of special privilege
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION FOR
VARIANCE NO. 2005-05
July 5, 2005
Page 2 of 2
inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and district in which
the subject property is located.
The City has a~redzrdal tlxit crnaidering the irr~lar, triang~r(arslaape g~tlae l~ ared the topoBraPhY ~the lo¢
that tlae grarning ~a fz~ce foot (5 J damase in laxh tlae froru a~ad mar~ard setlazdzs ~vill ymt crnatitzrte a graYu
~SP~eial P+z~ immaisteiu zeixh thz li~ratations u~wiz a*h~er properties in the zianity arxl district in zeliid~
the subjxt projar is lcrat~rG
3. That in approving the Variance, any reductions authorized from the strict interpretation of
the Zoning Ordinance represents the minimum deviation from the Code necessary to
fulfill the purpose of this Chapter and enable reasonable development of the property.
77ae City has crndud~el tlaat a~aideri~ tlae irregc~lar, tria~ularshape ~tlae lo¢ a~xl tlae toPograPhY ~tlae lar
that thegranti~ ~a faze fo~ (5) damase in &xli tlae frorn ared wuryzrd set&zdzs zeill yrot a»atitzuea grant
~SP~eial Pnvl~ immaistera zezrh tlae li~rexations upon al.~- propei2ia in tlae zitinity arxl distr'r~t in ~ehrdi
tlaesubjar prrr jat zs lorataL
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above find' s, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY approve Variance o. 005-OS
Ron LaPe e, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on July 5, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners
CHAIRMAN, GONZALES, O'NEAL
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners
LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
anning Commission
ATTEST:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-76
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAI~,
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECI,ARATION 2005-03
AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND
REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE PROJECT
KNOWN AS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
NO. 2005-02 AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-03
LOCATED AT APN 373-071-018.
WF3EREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Lumos
Communities, LLC to request approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-03 and
Miugauon Monitoring and Reporting Program for the proposed General Plan Amendment and
Zone Change; and
WHEREAS, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-03 and Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program has been prepared to evaluate environmental impacts resulting with the projecq
and
WHEREAS, the Pluuung Coimivssion of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of makuig recommendation to the City Council adopting Mitigated Negative
Declarauon No. 2005-03 and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Pluuiiiig Coi~vssion
has considered evidence presented by the Communiry Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on July 5, 2005; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Intent to Adopt (NOI) has been filed with the Office of Planning
and Research (SCH No. 2005051169) and the Counry of Riveiside Qerk of said applications, and
the Pluuiing Division has requested a public review period of said docuxnent, from May 31, 2005 to
June 29, 2005; and
WIIEREAS, the Plamiuig Cominission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE as follows:
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-03 and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has
been prepared, submitted and reviewed in accordance with requiremenu of the California
Environmental Qualiry Act and the Cit~s CEQA requiremenu. The report is complete and
adequate in it's evaluation of all environmental effects and associated discretionary approvals, and
will not result in any significant environmental affecu with mitigation measures of the project
known as Lumos Communites based on the following findings;
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2005-03
Page 2 of 2
FINDINGS - MITIGATED NEGATIVE DEQ.ARATION NO. 2005-03
1. Revision in the project plans or proposal made by or agreed to by the applicant before a
proposed mitigated negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would
avoid the effects or mitigated the effects to a point where cleuly no significant effects would
occur; and
Tlae applicantlxrs mule n~ciszons w tlae pmjat orlxrs agra~l to spazfu•mrd'uions xehid~ ~Id azoid the ~s ar
naLigzte tlae ~'~s ~the projat to a poiru ~al~ere nn sign'rfirarn effau zeor~ld arur.
2. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the agency, that the
projea as revised may have significant effect on the environment.
Pursuarn to tJ~e eudem~ r~ei-ca~ in tlae light ~'tlae ze{ide r~earel prrseiual to staff tlae prajaz zeill reet hu-ce a
sigrr~m ~far on the ercriromrern cmaideri~ the appli~able Comlitio~a ~ App~vzul ared Mitigztion
Monitorzng Report Pro~-am
WHEREAS, the Planning Connivssion recommends to the Ciry Council that it finds that
Mitigated Negative Declatation No. 2005-03 and Mitigation Monitoring and Reponing Program is
complete and adequate and provides appropriate environmental documentation for the project and
fully complies with the requiremenu of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the Cit~s
environmental clearance procedures.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findin s, the Plam~uig Cominission of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMIVIEND that the Ci uncil of the Ciry of Lake
Elsinore certify Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2 5-03.
Ron LaPere, Cki
Lake Elsinore Pluuung Coiiunission
I herebycertifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Plam~uig Cocxunission at a meeting
thereof conducted on July 5, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Conunissione~: LAI'ERE, O'NEAL, GONLALES
NOES: Cocncnissioners:
ABSENT: Comnvssioners: LEIRIMER
ABSTAIN: Cominissioneis:
ATTEST:
Conunission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-77
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
TF3E CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNQL OF THE
CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE APPROVAL OF GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-02 AMENDING THE
LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE PARCELS
IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 373-071-013
FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) TO MEDILTM
HIGH DENSITY (MHD) RESIDENTIAL
WHEREAS, Lumos Communities, LLC, has initiated proceedings to amend the General
Plan Land Use Map by requesting a General Plan Amendment changing the designation of the
parcel known as Assessor Parcel Number 373-071-013 from General Conunercial (GGj to Medium
H'igh Density (M~ID); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Conunission of the City of I.ake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of mal~ig recommendations to the Ciry Council for changes to the approved
General Plan Land Use Map; and
WI IEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plamiuig Cominission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on July 5, 2005.
NOW TT-IEREFORE, the Plam~ing Coiruiussion of the Ciry of Lake ELsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plam~uig Coimnission has considered the proposed General Plan
Amendment No. 2005-02, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve
the proposed amendment to the Land Use Designation. The Plaiuiuig Cominission finds and
deternunes that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-03/Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requiremenu of the California
Environmental Qi.ialityAct (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effecu of the proposed project,
based upon the following findings and determinations:
SECT'ION 2. That in accordance with State Plam~uig and Zoning law and the City of I.ake
Elsinore the following findings for the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2005-02 have
been made as follows:
1. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not be: a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort
or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed
amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the propeny or improvemenu in the
neighborhood or within the City.
The ~az' Ger,~ral Plan A~rera~rera has !~n anal~a~ relatize to i1s parenticrl'zty to F~ cl~rin~r7al to tlae
laPalth, sa}~ecjs ~ort and zeelfarP ~tlae persom~ nsiding or zeor~Zia~ ~vitbin tlae r.~i~ila~rlroxl ~'tlae propc~sal
arrer,d~renx TJae prirrary issue idencr~l by staff'mlatg to tJae trafJ'u' iyrg'icutt ~thePmPasa~ densit~ Staff
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-02
Page 2 of 2
crnad~ &ual on the Traffic Irr¢~acx Report th~e L ecel ~'Sercice far th~e irneisszirns in tl~e StudyA ma z¢i1l rro¢
l~ clEgrudel as a result ~this projat miardering tlae ~xigzCrares ideruifialarz~ the i~mcerreiu ra3r,rire~
2. The proposed General Plan Amendment will permit reasonable development of the area
consistent with iu constrainu and will make the area more compatible with adjacent properties.
71~epropasa~ Ger.~ral PlanArrr„recGre~u zerll alloze~the der~irertt ~18 d~eelling rnnu per ~ acre mxximarc
3. The proposed General Plan Amendment wiil not have a significant effect on the environment.
71ae px>posal Ger,~ral Plan A rrerelm~u zvuc indudal zeithin the d~criptiwc ~tl~e projat's Inrzial Stud}~ Basal
on the Initral Sta~d~ staff rErorrnrends that City Camxil adopt a Mitigztal N~Ztize De~'aratior~ zeliid~
condude~ zv#h ~ratigztions that tl~e j~rojat z¢ill rroE lxtze a sigrnfuar2 effat on tlae e~zurvrnrenG
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above fin ' s, the Plamiuig Comnvssion of the Cary
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOIVIMEND tha the ' uncil of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve General Plan Amendment No. 20 2.
Ron LaPere,
Lake Elsinore Planning Coiiuivssion
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planniug Conunission at a meeting
thereof conducted on July 5, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Coinmissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
NOES: Conunissioners:
ABSEN'I': Commissioners:
LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Comnvssioners:
ATTEST:
Robert Brady, Secretatyto e Planning Coininission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-78
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNQL OF THE
CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE APPROVAL OF ZONE
CHANGE NO. 2005-03 CHANGING THE ZONING
DESIGNATION OF THE PARCEL(S) SPECIFICALLY
DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 373-071-018
FROM (G2) GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO (R 3) HIGH
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT UNDER THE
ZONING ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, Lumos Communities, LLC, has initiated proceedings to change the zoning
designation of the subject parcels known as APN 373-071-018 from (G2) General Commercial to
(R 3) E-Lgh Densiry Residential District; and
WI~REAS, the Plazzuulg Conuivssion of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for changes to the approved
Zoning Map; and
WF3EREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plaunuig Comaiission
has considered evidence presented by the Communiry Development Department and other
interested paities at a public hearing held with respect to this item on July 5, 2005.
NOW TI~,REFORE, the Plamiuig Conunission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Pluuiing Conuivssion has considered the proposed Zone Change No.
2005-03, prior to mal~ig a decision to recommend that the Ciry Council approve the proposed
amendment to the Zoning Map. The Plam~uig Commission finds and detexmines that Mitigated
Negative Declaration No. 2005-03 and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is adequate
and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Califomia Environmental Qualiry Act
(CEQA) which analyzes environmental effects of the proposed project, based upon the following
findings and determinations:
SECI'ION 2. That in accordance with State Pluuiing and Zoning law and the Ciry of Lake
Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Zone Change No. 2005-03 have been made as
follows:
FINDINGS - ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-03
i. The proposed zone change will not be; a) detrimental to the health, safery, comfort or general
welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed
amendment or within the Ciry, or b) injurious to the property or improvemenu in the
neighborhood or within the City.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
ZONE CHANGE NO. 200407
Page 2 of 2
?7ae propose~ Zw,~ CYxi~ Gxcs Ix~en amly~al n~atize to i1s parentiality to Ix decri>rental to tlae health, saf~ls
mrr~ort a7acl zerlfarz ~the p~ersrnzs r~iding ar zeorizi~ ieirhin tlae n~i~ilxrrhoal of th~e p~vpcsa~ arrpr.drrpnG 71ae
PnmzYY zssue identifi«l by staff'rr~ata to the traffic arr~avs ~the propasal derait~ Staff, condr~da~ ~asal on the
Traffic I~rg`iart ReporS that the Lecel ~Sercice for tl~e irnersatirna in the Study Ama zeill n~ (~ clEgr-ad~l as a
result ~ the natiigzcions arnl mrelitio~a ~ aPP~~ Plac~l on this proj«t as zedl as tlae ultimzte gazls and
abj~rzizes g~the Ger,e~-al Plan CirrzrlationElerrerrc
2. The proposed action will be consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the General
Plan and the development standards established with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
(LEMG).
Basal on its arral~sis, staff laas anada~da~l that tlae ra~uatelam~xf~rent to tlae Ger.e~-al Plan La~xl UseMap a~xl
the m»spor.ding Zore C~ian~ allozei~ tl~e deceloPm~rt ~tlae firture ~rriurn projaz is amsisterrt zerxh
GOAL 1.0 ~tlae Ger.e~-al Plan Hwesing Elerrer~y d~ligzti~ tbe City to prnzide "d~nt hausing c~prntuniticc
and a satisfying lizing er~i>arurerrt far ~iderns ~Lake Elsirrore':
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Conunission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOA~IIVIE t the 'ty uncil of the Ciry of Lake
Elsinore approve Zone Change No.2005-03.
Ron L ere, Chairinuz
Lake Elsinore Planning Corcunission
I herebycertifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Planning Conui~ission at a meeting
thereof conducted on JulyS, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Coimivssioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
NOES: Coimiussione~:
ABSEN'I': Commissioners: LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
Conmvssion
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-79
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2005-04
FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2004-10; TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP (FOR CONDOMIMIUM
PURPOSES) MAP NO. 32674; RESIDENTIAL
DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-11; AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-27
LOCATED AT 32281 RIVERSIDE DffiVE - APN
379-315-033.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Riverlake
Villas Partners, LP to request approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-04 for the
purpose of developing a residential condominium community;
WHEREAS, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-04 has been prepared to evaluate
environmental impacts resulting with the project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendation to the City Council adopting Mitigated
Negative Declaration No. 2005-04; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on July 5, 2005; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Intent to Adopt (NOI) has been filed with the Office of Planning
and Research and the County of Riverside Clerk of said applications, and the Planning Division
has requested a public review period of said document, from June 24, 2005 to July 25, 2005;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE as follows:
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-04 has been prepared, submitted and reviewed in
accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City's CEQA
requirements. The report is complete and adequate in iYs evaluation of all environmental effects
of the project known as Riverlake Villas and associated discretionary approvals and will not
result in any significant environmental affects with mitigation measures, based on the following
findings;
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2005-10
Page 2 of 2
FINDINGS - MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2005-03
1. Revision in the project plans or proposal made by or agreed to by the applicant before a proposed
mitigated negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the effects
or mitigated the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur; and
T{ae applirarn lxrs mzde rerisiors to tlae pmjaz ar has agrc~l to s~iJ'u mre~'uions zalnd~ zeo~(d azoid tl~e ~ts ar
~ratigzte the eff'~rxs gfthe prajaz to a poirn zabere no sigrrifuarn effau zeoHld axur.
2. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the agency, that the
project as revised may have significant effect on the enviroxunent.
Purs~arn to the eiiderKe n~i~a' in tlae light ~'tlae zahde ~rrl pr~seruez' to staff tlae proj~ zeill rro¢ Jxaze a
sigrr'rfrcarn ~'~ on tJae e~~.iramrer2 considering the applirala'e Crnxfitions ~' Appnnul ared Mitigztion
Mordtrning Report Program
WHEREAS, the Planning Conuivssion recommends to the City Council that it finds that
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-04 is complete and adequate and provides appropriate
environmental doamientation for the project and fully complies with the requiremenu of CEQA,
the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's environmental clearance procedures.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Plam~uig Comavssion of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMIVIEND t the ' uncil of the Ciry of Lake
Elsinore certify Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2 05-0
Ron L re, Ch
Lake Elsinore Plamzing Conunission
I herebycertifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Plam~ing Comrnission at a meeting
thereof conducted on July 5, 2005 bythe following vote:
AI'ES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
NOES: ConunissioneTS:
ABSENT: Conunissioneis: LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Cominissioners:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-80
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2004-10 AMENDING THE LAND
USE DESIGNATION OF THE PARCEL IDENTIFIED AS
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 379-315-033
WHEREAS, Riverlake Villas Partners, LP, has initiated proceedings to amend the
General Plan Land Use Map by requesting a General Plan Amendment changing the designation
of the parcels known as Assessor Parcel Number 379-315-033 from General Commercial (GC)
to Medium High Density (MHD); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for changes to the
approved General Plan Land Use Map; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on July 5, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION l. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed General Plan
Amendment No. 2004-10, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council
approve the proposed amendment to the Land Use Designation. The Planning Commission finds
and determines that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-04 is adequate and prepared in
accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which
analyzes environmental effects of the proposed project, based upon the following findings and
determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-10
FINDINGS - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2004-10
1. The proposed General Plan Ainendment will not be: a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort
or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed
amendment or within the Ciry, or b) injurious to the property or improvemenrs in the
neighborhood or within the Ciry.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2004-10
Page 2 of 2
The projxaa~ Ger,~ral Plan Arrered~rent has Jx~n analyzal ra'atize to its pateiuial'uy to 1~ d~rirrental to the
l,~ealth, safet~ mrrfort a~xl ~ceelfare gf tlae persrna ~siding or zeor~zing zeixhin t!~ reeighlx~rlx~a' ~tlae jrropasal
a~ The primzry zssue iderllzfral by staff mlata to tlae tra}fu' a~u~s ~the proposal de~aity Staff,
arrdude~' lersaz' on the Tra~'icl~act Report the Leca' of Se~zic~ for the irnersatians in tlae Stuc~yA~ra zvll n~
(~ dEgrada~l as a result ~this projax mrsidering tbe ~ratzgztions identifze l and tl~e i~rozerrent re~cd~L
2. The proposed General Plan Amendment will permit reasonable development of the azea
consistent with iu constrainu and will make the area more compatible with adjacent properties.
The pro[~asa~ Ger,~-al Plan Arrerx/rr,eru ieill allozv the applicaru to derelop th~e site -ceith th~e prop~al de~ai~Y ~
10.3 cl~aelling~nts peracre
3. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment.
71ae propasal Gereeral Plan A~rereGrent ~zs i~adzrdaz' zvtbin the decriptirnz ~the proj~t's Initial Studjc Basa~
on th~e Initial St~dx staff ravnvrends tl~at C'uy Carmil adc~it a Miti~l NcgZtiee D~aratiorg ~ehidi
comi'uder~ zezth rratiigZtior~s tbat tlae projat zvll ~ huzea si~ firam effat on the erciirom~~nt
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND th City cil of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve General Plan Amendment No. 2004-1 .
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on July 5, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
Brady, Secretar~~Yo the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-81
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAI' (FOR CONDOMINIUM
PURI'OSES) NO. 32674 FOR THE "RIVERLAI~, VILLAS"
LOCATED AT 32281 RIVERSIDE DRIVE - APN 379-315-033)
Wf-IEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Riverlake Villas
Partneis, LP, (formerly Spathco), to request the approval of Tentative Parcel Map (For
Condominium Purposes) No32674 for the establishment of a residential condominium community.
WHEREAS, the Plam~uig Comnvssion of the Ciryof Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of recommending approval of Tentative Parcel Maps (For Condominium
Pwposes) for residential projecu; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plannuig Coirunission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on July 5, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Plaiuiuig Commission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of recommending approval for Tentative Parcel Maps;.
NOW THEREFORE, the Plannuig Couunission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLUE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plamiuig Commission has considered the proposed request for
Tentative Parcel Map (For Condominiuxn Purposed) Map No. 32674 and has found it acceptable.
The Plaiuiuig Coiiuiussion finds and deternunes that this project is consistent with Section 16
"Subdivisions" of the Lake ELsinore Municipal Code (LEMG~, Section(s) 66424 and 66427 of the
California Subdivision Map Act (CSMA) and that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-4 is
adequate and prepared in accordance with the requiremenu of the Califomia Envirorunental Qualiry
Act (CEQA), which analyzes environmental effects of the project, based upon the following
findings and determuiations:
SECT'ION 2. That in accordance with the Section(s) 66424 and 66427 of the California
Subdivision Map Act (CSMA) and Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
(LEMG~, the following findings for the approval of the condominium map has been made as
follows:
FINDINGS - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES~.
1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is
consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives,
policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Govei~ient Code
Section 66473.5).
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES) NO. 32674
Page 2 of 2
71ae p~vjat as desigr.~l assists in adnezing thz dereloprreru ~'a ze~'l-lalar.ma' a~xl fiaxt'wnal rras ~~sideruia~
m»vrerria~ i~irstria~ opaz spac~ rareztiorral a~xl instctutional larxl us~ (GOAL 1.0, La~xl Use Elerrent) as
zeell prozide d~em harasing opEwrturru'ies ardd a satisfyir,g liung e~zcirrnvrern for residaus ~Lake Elsiyrore
(GOAL 1.0, HacrsingElemryrt)
2. The effects this project is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the public service
requirements of iu residenu and the available fiscal and environmental resources have been
considered and balanced.
Corrside,ing rhe eff'azs rhis projat is tikely to l,~aze upon rl,~ ~Ls gFrhe n~ion a mnd'udon ~aPP~ '~
irrqilerrentaz' zahuh zeor~ld ~uire tl~e appli~arn to emer irno an agra~m zrith tlae Ra~era'oprrern Agerxy ~tlae
Ciry ~Lake Elsirror~ prvzrcling 15% ~tlae r~rits in tlae projax as affo~zla(~e hoaaing urats in acmrda~xe zeilh
the re3ui>errerrts ~ Satiax 33413(bJ ~ the Califorraa Co»aramriy Raa'eza'oprrer2 Law or an alte~r~atize
a~dzzrlerrt ~ion zebid~ mry inrliule (zeitlrout linatatiorr~ d~el'uation ~'zzrrarn la~ a»atruction ~'a/forzlcrla'e annu
on a~aaher szt~ or pay~reru of an in lieu f~ ~irlcurlatal w prnzide suffuier2 fi~rx/s to underrvite tlae longterm
affardabiluy of an a~ti-urlent namz'er ~ r~de~~opm~rt projat amas.
3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in anysignificant environmental impact.
The projax has l~z ada~uately crnzd'uior.~zl by all applirab[e departrr,e~us a~xl agerxies ayri zaill rrot th~rfor~
result in arry sigrrifuam erzciYarvreiual irnpacts.
NOW, TF~REFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plamiuig Comcnission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECONIn~ND T QT'Y QL APPROVAL of a
Tentative Parcel Map (For Condominium Purposes) N. 326 4.
Ron LaPere, Cha;,,,,a.,
Lake Elsinore Plazuiuig Coinmission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plannuig Conunission at a meeting
thereof conducted on July 5, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissione~: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
NOES: Cocnnvssioners:
ABSEN'T: Commissioners: LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Comnvssionexs:
RESOLUI'ION NO. 2005-82
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~, ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-11 FOR THE
DESIGN, CONSTRUCI'ION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF
TF3E "RIVERLAKE VILLAS" LOCATED AT 32281
RIVERSIDE DRIVE - APN 379-315-033
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Ciry of Lake Elsinore by Riverlake Villas
Partners, I.P to request the approval of Residential Design Review No. 2004-11 for the design,
construction and establishment of a residential condominium community.
WHEREAS, the Plamiiug Conunission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of recommending approval of Design Reviews for residential projecu; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plannuig Coirunission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on July 5, 2005; and
NOW TF3EREFORE, the Plaiuiuig Commission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECI'ION 1. The Plaiming Cominission has considered the proposed request for
Residential Design Review No. 2004-11 and has found it acceptable. The Plaiuiuig Coinmission
finds and determines that this projea is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and
detexmines that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-04 is adequate and prepared in accordance
with the requiremenu of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes
environmental effecu of the proposed project, based upon the following findings and
detem~inations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the project have been made as follows:
FINDINGS - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2004-11
1. The project, as approved, will complywith the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
71ae proposal Resideruial Design Redecv~aruain~llaerein cmrg~lig zaith the gral.c ared abjati-ces ~'tlae Ger~ral
P(a~y in that tlae appmzul ~ this Cor~do~rvniurn Conviunity zeill assist in ad~iezing the de~nt ~ a
ze~l-&alane~l arxl fum'wnal ~~' recideruia~ m»vrenia~ i~adustr'w~ operi spac~ r~reational aYxt
i~atizzrtional la~xl us~s as zeell as erxnuraging i~lustrial la~xl uses to di~cersify Lake Elsinore's az~rro»ac &ue
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
Tl~e pmpasal Residential Design Reve~mmai~l laer~in is appropriate to tl,~ site arnl su~ing deia'op~rents
in that the Coredrnrammimzprajax Ixrs l~z deigr.aa' in comide~-ation ~'tlae size ared slxt~e ~tlae proPercls th~ebY
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-ll
Page 2 of 2
creating iyuerest a~acl zttryin~-cistus as a person rmces along tl~e st~ Furth~r- the pmjaz as propasaz' zei(l create a
~asr~ally pl~rsi~ rrorrd~r-actize Yelationship lx~cv~n tlae proposal a~xl eeisting projats in tlae aro'ntatural desigrg
aa~ara~xl rraterial,s a~xlsite desig~z prvpasal eziderze a corecenz farqual'uy ared originalir~
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in anysignificant adverse environmental impacts.
Although tlae propmal projat ct~ld ha~ce a sigmfuarn effax on the ericironrreny Jx~ause reziszores in the p~aj~az
haze lx~z mrde by ar agr~l to by the projax propon~nt ar~'significarn ac~zerse ~fars zeould rro¢ l~ arniapataL
Furtlaer, pursr~arn to tlae Califo~rria E~zcimnrrental Qual'ztyAct (CEQA), tlaeMixigzta~ N~gztizeD~'aration
for the propae~l Residential Desig~z Reaecv referer,e~l h~erein facmd that tlae propasal projat zvll n~ar lxtze a
sigrrifuar2 ~fat on tlae ercci~amrent ptnsuam to the attada~rl Cored'uirna ~Appmu:l a~xl riatiigzC'tons p~v(x~al
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guarurtees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuam to Sa2ion 17.82.070 (Aczion gf tlae Plamri~ Corrar~sszon) ~'tlae Lake Elsiyrore Mr~mapal Ccde
(LEMC~, the pro~iasal Raidertllal Dgign Reiierv referer,~l J~erein has Ix~rt sd~la~ far m~aicle~-ation aml
aP[rrozul ~tlae Planrri~ Crnrarvssion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Fin ' the Plaiuiuig Conuivssion of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECONIA~ND T Q QL APPROVAL of a
Residential Design Review No. R 2004-11.
Ron LaPere, C.haixrnan
Lake Elsinore Plam~uig Conmvssion
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plaiuung Comnvssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on July 5, 2005 by the following vote:
AI'ES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
NOES: Comnvssioners:
ABSENT': Comnussioners: I.ARIMER
ABSTAIN: Conunissionexs:
ATTEST: ~
Robe Brady, Secretaryt e Plannuig Coimivssion
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-83
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-27
FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE "RIVERLAI~
VILLAS", LOCATED AT 32281 RIVERSIDE DRIVE - APN
379-315-033
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Ciry of Lake Elsinore by Riverlake Villas
Partners, LP to request the approval of a Conditional Use Pemut 2004-27, for the establishment of
"Riverlake Villas"; and
WHEREAS, the Plamiuig Conunission of the City of I.ake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of approving Conditionai Use Pernuu for condominium projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plannuig Couunission
has considered evidence presented by the Communiry Development Depaxtment and other
interested pazties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on July 5, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Plam~uig Conm~ission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plaiuung Comiiussion has considered the proposed request for
Conditional Use Pernut No. 2004-27 and has found it acceptable. The Pluining Cominission finds
and deterniines that this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and deterniines
that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-04 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the
requiremenu of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental
effects of the proposed project, based upon the following findings and detexminations:
SECI'ION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Pemuu)) of the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings for the project have been made as follows:
FINDINGS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 200427
1. The proposed use, on its own meriu and within the context of iu setting, is in accord with
the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the plaiuiing district in which the site
is located.
In order to ad~ieze a zea'l bzlanea~ ared fzmrt'wnal ~~r~,cider2ia~ ~cr~ i~lisstricr~ ~eri spac~
~tional arxl irstzzutior~al laaad uss, staff'laas tlaornughly eurluatez'tlae (a~xl use m»~ttibiluys rrozs~ nzr~'u'
aml otlaer enziromr,erucd hazanls Yelatez' to tl.~ proposal CArxlitior~rl Use Pernat far a Corxlarreniunz
Co»v~zbTUy'eferenc~l laerein Aaordingl~ the pro[xisal larxl use is in rorati»erKe zeith t!~ ahjaxizes ~tlae
Gen~ral Plan arxl tlae purpose ~'the plarrningdistrict in zehid~ thesite zs loratxl
PLANNING COMIVIISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-27
Page 2 of 3
2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general heakh, safety, comfort, or general
welfare of peisons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use orthe
Ciry, or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City.
In aaorri zvxh tl~e purpases ~ the Chapter 17.74 (Cor,ditional Use Pe»rats) ~ tlae Lake Elsisrore
Mur¢apal Caf~ tlae CiLy ~axliza~ that the propasal mredonanium use refererxxl laerein mzy lxaze a pateruicrl
to r~tizely irr~ad tlae 7ra'fare of p~ersoras ~siding or zern~zing zeithin the ~i~ib~rl~arl or the Cu~
Crnaidering tbis, staff has sul~starniatal tlzzt all applirab~e City De~artm~us a~xl A~aaes l~aze Ix~rz
affrnzlal th~e opportuinty far a~~i reciece~ ~'tlae use and lxaze amprporute~l all applirable crnrorents
cr~ed/ar mrefitwr~s relata ~ to i~stallation a~l maintenarxe ~ laYrlsrapi~ stra~ dad ~uatiors, r~gulatio~a ~
poirus gf zehicular ing~ss ar,el cgress arnl amtral ~parer2ral rnasa~xes, so as to eli~nate any recgztize
i~aas to tlae ~ral hpalth, sa}~eCjS a»r~'orti or~ral zeelfar~ ~tJae su»a~rr~ling rzighbo»'~oca' ar tlae Cit}~
3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for
all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required by
Tide 17 of the LEMC.
7'lre pro[wsa~ m~,r,,,d,.,ny,r,r~anir~rn use referer,a~l laerein has !~n de~igr,~l im m~sideration ~tlae size ami shape ~
~J2 jIY0~IC/Zy~ 1""""'Y SCYCY~lf7iEYllilg dYX~ 2YI~lYXZYeg t~ LY17YY,&~IC11C ZYK~ZLSIYlQ~ dYPCL FlLlthCl"'~ l~?2 ~IX1 QS
prapasa~ zeidl cwrq~lerrem the qual'zty ~ erzstir~g decelopm~u ayel zeill c~eate a zisz~ally plQasin~ yroro-
decractiee mlationslrip ~n tlae proposal a~xl eczsting projaxs, in tlu~t the starage a~ has l~z reaierzttl to
eiaure ade~z~ate prozision ~scrt~rring fiom rhe public ri~its-~'zetty oradjace~n properties.
4. The site for the proposed use relates to streeu and highways with proper design both as to
width and type of pavement to carrythe type and quantityof traffic generated bythe subject
use.
Tlae prnpasal mradorrarrium use referene~l herein has Ix~n muece~l as to its ra~ation w tlae ~eidth aYxl type ~
pazerrent ~ to rarry the type a~xl Rr~arttuy 9Fn"uffu'~er~rata~ in that the City has ade~ately eurluatsl
tl~e po¢anial irrg~acu assaiate~ zrith tlae propasal outdoor storage p~ior w iz~ ap~nvuzl arxl lxrs arrd ~i~ior,~l
tl~e prrojaY to l~serrttl bY m~s ~ade~uate raPaacY arxl d~sign starxlards to proride reasonableamss by ra ,
t~udz, tra~ai~ a~a' bicyde
5. In approving the subject use located at 32281 Riverside Drive - APN 379-315-033 there will
be no adverse affect on abutting property or the permitted and noxmal use thereof.
Tbe prapasal uce has Jxaz thorar~ily reiieuaz' arnl amlitior,~el by all applirable City DeParzrrents aYxl
~rtsideAger,aes, a'i~ranati~ tlae po¢eruial forarry a~xl all adzerse effaxs on the abr~etin8P~1~
6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pwsuant to Section 17.74.50 of the LEMC have been
incoxporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Permit to insure that the use
continues in a mamier envisioned bythese findings for the term of the use.
Purs~arn to Sazzon 17.74.050 (Actio~z ~the Planning Carror~ssion) ~tlae Lake ElsirroreMurricipal Cale
(LEMC), tlae CarelorraniuYn Co»vizanty kn~acvz as `Rizedake Villas" has Jx~rz sdaali~lel far crnaideration
andapprou:l ~thePlaanringCrnrmassion
PLANNING CONIMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-27
Page 3 of 3
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Find
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Condit~6
the Plamiing Commission of the City
~e Penniri~o. 2004-27
Lake Elsinore Planning Coiiuivssion
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Pluiiiuig Comavssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on July 5, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Coimnissionexs: LAI'ERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
NOES: Coimivssionexs:
ABSENT': Conunissioneis: LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Coimnissioners:
A RTC CT.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-84
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNLA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CTTY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-04 FOR THE
ESTABLISAMENT OF AN "EXPRESS AUTOMOTIVE
LUBRICATION FACILITY" LOCATED ON PAD "T" OF
THE LAKE ELSINORE MARKET PLACE, ASSESSOR
PARCEL NO. 377-040-027 ON TPM NO. 23269
WHEREAS, B.P. Hanrath of WD Partners, agent for EZ Lube, has initiated proceedings
to request the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-04 for the establishment of an
"Express Automotive Lubrication Facility"; and
WHEREAS, although the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated with the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Permits; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Deparhnent
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on July 5, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Pianning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Conditional Use
Permit 2005-04 prior to priar to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve
the proposed Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the
proposed facility complies with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section
15162 - Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations, based upon the following findings and
determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-04
have been made as follows:
1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord with
the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the
site is located.
In order to achieve a well balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial,
industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses, staff has thoroughly
evaluated the land use compatibility, noise, tra~c and other environmental hazards
related to the proposed Conditional Use Permit. Accordingly, this proposed land use is in
concurrence with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-04
Page 2 of 3
district in which the site is located as well as the development standards of the approved
Lake Elsinore Market Place plan.
2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general
welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or
the City, or injurious to properiy or improvements in the neighborhood or the City.
In accord with the purposes of the Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code, the City realized that the proposed express automotive
lubricating faciliry located at Assessor Parcel Number 377-040-027 may have a potential
to negatively impact the welfare ofpersons residing or working within the neighborhood
or the Ciry. Considering this, staff has substantiated that all applicable Ciry
Departments and Agencies have been afforded the opportunity for a thorough review of
the use and have incorporated all applicable comments and/or conditions related to
installation and maintenance oflandscaping, street dedications, regulations ofpoints of
vehicular ingress and egress and control ofpotential nuisances, so as to eliminate any
negative impacts to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the
surrounding neighborhood or the City.
3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and
for ail the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features
required by Title 17 of the LEMC.
The proposed express automobile lubricating facility located at Assessor Parcel Number
377-040-027 has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property,
thereby strengthening and enhancing the immediate industrial area. Further, the project
as proposed, will complement the quality of existing development and will create a
visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects,
in that the proposed uses have been reviewed to ensure adequate provision of screening
from the public rights-of-way or adjacent properties.
4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to
width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the
subject use.
The proposed express automotive Zubricating facility located at Assessor Parcel Number
377-040-027 has been reviewed as to its relation to the width and type of pavement
needed to carry the type and guantity of traffic generated, in that the City has adeguately
evaluated the potential impacts associated with the proposed uses prior to its approval
and has conditioned the project to be served by roads of adequate capacity and design
standards to provide reasonable access by car, truck, transit, and bicycle.
In approving the subject use located at Assessor Parcel Number 377-040-027 there will
be no adverse affect on abutting property or the permitted and normal use thereof.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-04
Page 3 of 3
The proposed use has been thoroughly reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City
Departments and outside Agencies, eliminating the potential for any and all adverse
effects on the abutting property.
6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.74.50 of the LEMC have
been incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Permit to insure that the use
continues in a manner envisioned by these findings for the term of the use.
Pursuant to Section 17.74.050 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed express automotive lubricating facility located at
Assessor Parcel Number 377-040-027 has been scheduled for consideration and
approval of the Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-0~
Ron LaPere, Chairma4(
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on ,Tuly 5, 200$y the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-85
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-04 TO
ALLOW FOR THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF A
1,854 SQUARE FOOT EXPRESS AUTOMOTIVE
LUBRICATION FACILITY LOCATED ON PAD "T" OF
THE LAKE ELSINORE MARKFT PLACE, ASSESSOR
PARCEL NO. 377-040-027 ON TPM NO. 23269.
WHEREAS, B.P. Hanrath of WD Partners, agent for EZ Lube, has initiated proceedings
to request the approval of Commercial Design Review No. 2005-04 to allow for the design and
development of a 1,854 square foot `Bxpress Automotive Lubrication Facility" located on Pad
"T" of the Lake Elsinore Market Place, Assessor Parcel No. 377-040-027; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for Design Reviews; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on July 5, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinare DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Conditional Use
Permit 2005-04 prior to prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve
the proposed Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the
proposed facility complies with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section
15162 - Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations, based upon the following findings and
determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Design Review No. 2005-04 have been
made as follows:
l. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan
and the Zoning District in which the project is located.
The proposed Commercial Design Review located within Assessor Parcel Number 377-
040-027 complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan, in that the approval
of this Express Automotive Lubrication Facility will assist in achieving the development
of a well-balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space,
recreational and institutional land uses, diversifying Lake Elsinore's economic base.
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION FOR
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2003-13
Page 2 of 3
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all
other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The proposed Commercial Design Review located at Assessor Parcel Number 377-040-
027 is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the Shopping Center
known as the Lake Elsinore Market Place has been designed in consideration of the size
and shape of the property, thereby creating interest and varying vistas as a person moves
along the street. The proposed Commercial Design Review for the EZ Lube located on a
portion oft Assessor Parcel Number 377-040-027 complies with the approved
development known as the Lake Elsinore Market Place. Further the project as proposed
will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing,
non-detractive relationship between the proposed and ezisting projects in that the
architectural design, color and materials and site design proposed evidence a concern
for quality and originality.
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to
result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
The project complies with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section
15162 - Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations, as well as Environmental Impact
Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2004021018) for the Lake Elsinore Market Place.
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with
the objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed Commercial Design Review located at Assessor
Parcel Number377-040-027 has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the
Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve Commercial Design Review No. 2005-04.
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION FOR
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2003-Li
Page 3 of 3
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on;July 5,2005,by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners
LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
A. BTady, Secret~'y~to the
g Commission ~
RESOLITI'ION NO. 2005-86
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE QTY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECAMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL
OF RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-14
LOCATED IN TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO(s) 31357
AND 31685.
requesting De g~Revie appr val of~see n smglefamilytresi ntial dwelling unitsre'The p or pos~ed
residential development is located at the northwest and northeast comers of Mountain Street and
Raveta Lane; and
WHEREAS, the Plamiuzg Coinmission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of inaking recommendations to the Ciry Council pertaining to the Design Review
of residendal projecu; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plamiing Conunission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public meeting held with respect to this item on July 5, 2005.
NOW 'THEREFORE, the Plaiming Comnvssion of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECI'ION 1. The Pluinuig Caiiunission has considered the proposed design for seven
single-family residential dwelling uniu and has found them acceptable. The Plaiuuug Coinmission
and City Council reviewed and approved Tentative Parcel Map No. (s) TPM 31357 and TT'M 31685
in July of 2004. At that time, env~rorunental clearance was granted pwsuant to Section 15332 of the
California Enviroxunental QualiryAct (CEQA). No further environmental clearance is necessary.
SECI'ION 2. That in accordance with Section 17.82 (Design Review) of the I.ake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approvai of Residential Design Review No. 2004-14
have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will complywith the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project u located.
The pro[~saz' Rgiderrcicrl Design Rezier~~ lcrctta~ cu tlae yror~l~Z¢est arel rrortl~rst cmr~n ~'Mcv~ntain Stra~ ared
Razeta Lar,~ corr~lis zazth tlae gzds arxl ahjatiz~ ~'tJae Ger,~ral Plary in that tlae approu:l ~'this sir~le~. f~a~Y
resiclerrticd decrloprrent ~aill asszst in adnezin8 Jae de~Olrn~rn ~' a zeell-&alarxttl a~' furxzional ~
r~su+'e'utd~ cvrrm~rci~ ~t~ia~ o[~i spac~ rcrmacional a~xl instztartzonal la~xl uses us zaeeZ as e~xwsraging the
~ a~' mzirnenar~ ~a brazd ran~ ~ha~sin8 types. fOYUIl ZiXAIYL' gYCJ21p5 CLYdC~CtgC fQZE~pyjg,
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
71ae prapasal R~cidenticrl Dgign Rerzeu~ Za~ztxl at tJae yrortjnegt ami nortlaeast a~rr.ers ~'Ma.mtain St~ a~acl
RLIZelCt LCl7~ 7S CLj7~JYp~1Y/Q1Q LO tI~2 SZYC CtYB~ S72I7C~171d27Zg C~QZP~O~YIYCYdS Z72 tT~QI rI7i2 Single fayraly ~sidemial
dezeloprrern has l~n deigr~a' in crnaiderazion ~tlae size and shape ~tlaePY°P~ t~Y ~~ irnen~t arel
uzrying zistc~s as a person ~az~ alazg tlae stra~ Further the projat as propasal zazll ~lerrern tlae qualuy ~'
e~istingdezelop~rern arnl zeill cmatea zisaaallypleasin~ naz-c%icrctize yelatirnahip F~tze~n tJaepm,ocxalared
RESOLLTTION NO. 2005-86
PAGE 2
existing prnjars in that tlae an~'»zc~ural ds~igrg cu~ar a~xl muerials propasaz' eec~ls tlae size a~xl design g{'tl.~
l~onxs in the surnxrredingmea,
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in anysignificant adverse environxnental impacts.
Purs~arn to tlae Californicc Emi~vmrernal Qtial'uy Act (CEQAI, tlae propasal Residerrtial Dgig~z Redecv
lorutal at the r~rthz¢est arad ~rortlaeast m~r~s ~'Ma~ain St~ ar~' Razeta Lan~ as reziecettl a~acl mrrlitirnxzl
by all appli~aJ~e C'uy Dizisior~s and De[~anm~2c a~xl A~, zeill nar lazze a sign~m ef~'a2 on th~e
erc~irrnvrent punz~arn to A~tide 19 (Categorical Exemptronsf a~xl Saxiora 15332 (In-Fill
DevelopmentPmjectsJ.
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.060 of the Zoning Code, including
guaruitees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incotporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the properry in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursraurn to Sarion 17.82.070 (AcCio~z ~'t!~ Planrring Co»vra,ssion~ ~'the Lake Elsia~re Muni¢pal Ca(e
(LEMC), tl,~ jm~pasal Residernicrl Deign ReaEw Icrata~ at tJae yeor[jyraest a~xl nrntl~east co»~rs ~'Maumain
St~ aradRaz~a La~ Jaas lxaz sdxrbelal arel cmaider~el forap~rorul by tI,~PJQanung Co»a~assion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Piamiuig Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMA~ND TO THE QT'Y COL7NQL APPROVAL of
Residential Design Review No. 2004-14.
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plannuig Conunission at a meeting
thereof conducted on July 5, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Cominissioners:
NOES: Conunissioners:
ABSEN'I': Coinmissionexs:
ABSTAIN: Conunissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES
LARIMER
Lake Elsinore Plamung Commission
ATTEST:
RE SOLUTION NO. 2005-87
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH
SECTION 6.1.2 OF THE MULTIPLE SPECIES
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) FOR
THE PROJECT KNOWN AS THE COTTAGE LANE
SPECIFIC PLAN.
WHEREAS, a site specific focused survey for Narrow Endemic Plant Species is required by
Section 6.1.2 of the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSCHP) for the purpose of a
Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Ciry of I,ake Elsinore evaluated the consistency of the project with the
(MSHQ'); and
WI3EREAS, the Pluuiing Conunission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of inalflng recoiiunendation to the Ciry Council adopting the Findings of
Consistencywith the MSHQ'; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plamiing Conunission
has considered and approved the request by staff on June 21, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Plaiuiing Cominission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE as follows:
A Habitat Assessment prepared by Michael Brandman Associates has been prepared,
submitted and reviewed in accordance with requiremenu of the Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHQ'). The report is complete and adequate in it's evaluation of all
environmental effecu of the project known as the Conage I.ane Specific Plan project and
will not preclude the implementation of the MSHCP goals, based on the following finding;
FINDINGS-MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN
1. The proposed project is a project under the Cit~s MSHCP Resolution that must make an
MSHQ' Consistencyfinding before approval.
Purs~arn to tl~e City's MSHCI' Resalutiory Ixmause tlae jrropasal projat ra3zar~ a nam~i• gF' disc~ionary
app~vurls f~rom th~e City arxl zs subjs2 to CEQA r~ziera~ it m~st l~ ~ierurl far MSHCP crnaistem3; zeliidi
entails for th~e propasa~ prajaz detenr¢mng ~her it zs subjax to tlae City's LEAP prez~ss, a~aister2 zeith the
ProtErtiort ~Spares Assaiatal ~aith Ripctrian/Rieeri~ Amas ara~l Vemal Pa~l Guideli~s (MSHCP, ~
6.1.2J, Pr~at'wre of Narmr~EnderracPlam Spxies Guidelia~s (MSHCP, ~f 6.1.3), Addixional Sznzey 1V~z's
a~zl Pra~lisr~ (MSHCP, ~ 6.3.2), Ur'r~n/W/~ildlayals Interface Guidelin~s (MSHCP, ~ 6.3.2), Vc~etation
Mapping (MSHCP, $ 6.3.1) mquirerrents, Fuels Ma~gerrem Guidelir,~ (MSHCP, § 6.4), ar~' payrreru ~'
theMSHCP Loral DereloprrentMiti~ztionF~ (MSHCP O~zlir~arx~ § 4).
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CATTAGE LANE SPEQFIC PLAN MSHCI' CONSISTENCY
Page 2 of 3
2. The proposed project is not subject to the Joint Project Reviewprocess.
T/ae footprirn ~the pmjat site zs yro¢ lcr~ttal ~ezthin an MSHCI' Criteria Ama, aml th~or~ zew~ld n~ar l~
subjat to the joirn Proj~t Rezi~wprac~s.
3. The proposed project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools
Guidelines.
No ripariary rizeri~ iernal poal/fairy shrin~ habixat arxl arlaeruqr~atic 7esouru3 zeere ideruzfial on tlae proposal
projax site As a~rsrel~ rro further MSHCP and~sis or a~aerrution nz~asur~ are re~aar~l Tl~e propasal
prvjat zs ~ mresistzm zeith tlaeRiparian/Ri~erir~Amas a~ad Vernal Pads Guidelir,~s.
4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species
Guidelines.
The projat site dar ~ fall ~eithin tlae Narrou~Erxlerrsc Plam Spazes Surzey Amus. Tl~or~ a Ixrbitat
assessyreiu zs nat re3uire~ far Narracv~E rxlerrsc Plarn Spaa~. TGae propasal projax has b~n deterirdn~l to l~
cmaisterrt zaith th~e Pratatiora ~Narror~EralenacPlarn Sp~ies Guideli~s.
5. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional SurveyNeeds and Procedures.
77ae projat site das ~ fall zaixhan tJae Burrouing Oral Surzey A~ra In additirny iz zeus deterrran~l tliat tl~e
s[raia is ~ eepsxaal to azzn- on-site due w tlae lac~Z ~suitable habitaz 77ae projat is th~ore casisteru zeith
tbeAdd'uiorwl Suizey Narls Ra?uiren~rvs.
6. The proposed project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines.
Tbe propasal projax dc~s ~ pra~ude tlae Urban/WTildlareds Ime~face Gi.adelin~, in that tlae propasa~ projaz
dar ~ irnerface zeith an Urlazn/Wildlarxls amu. 7Tae prajat sixe is rrot zeixhin or ad'aceru to arry MSHCP
crixeria or cmaerrution a~ras. 71ae proposal projat is tlaer~'rnz crnazstem zaith tlae U~x'azn/Wilcllamis Irnerface
C'ruid~i~.
7. The proposed project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
Tlae ugaation ~'tlae ernz~ proja7 site has lxt~e mzppa~ 7his mapping zs suff~aent ~rler the MSHCP arnl is
mreszstern zeith theMSHCP. In additior; a habitat assessm~n zems cortt(arctal for corr~iliame ~eitb tl~MSHCP.
Tl~ projar site is r~ ~ceithin ar adjacem to anyMSHCP criteria or m~ae,vztion amus. 77ae proj«t site dces rrot
Pmude reparian/rizerin~ ar eemal poal habitaz 77ae projat sire amzruly cmaiszs ~u~aderelo[~al /ayel tlxtt lxrs
l~z hi~ily distur&~l thrwsgh ~a' abzten~rrt a~xl agria~ltural practices. No sasitize plarn or animrl spazes
~ere ide~«ifi~as parzrn'rallY oa~rin8 aaite during the lxrbitat assessrreru
8. The proposed project is consistent with the Fuels Muiagement Guidelines.
Tl~ prropasal projat dc~s ~ prafude tlae Fuels Mana~rern Guidelinps ~ the MSHCI? Acrori(i~~ th~e
propasal projez zs the~zfore cmzszstern ~caitli the Fue1c Manageireru Guideli~s.
9. The proposed project will be condiuoned to pay the Cit~s MSHQ' I,ocal Development
Mitigation Fee.
As a mreGtion g~approuz~ tJae proja2 Zaill l~ ra~rrir~l to pay tlae C'uy's MSHCP Loral Decelop~eruMitzgztia~z
F~at tlae ti~re ~issrea~ ~buildingper~razs.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
COTTAGE LANE SPEQFIC PLAN MSHQ' CANSISTENCY
Page 3 of 3
10. The proposed project overall is consistent with the MSHQ'.
The p~vpas~el projat mrr~ilies aml is amazstern z~ith all ~the n~uiral pmax(ur~s, pa~id~, ar~l g~da'i~s ~'the
Cityls MSHC1' Resdution ared tlae MSHC1? 71ae applicar2 has mule yeziszores to tlae projaz ar Ixrs agr~l to
spaifu' corel~is'ror~s, ~ahidi zew~ld awid tlae effats ar natigzte the effErts ~the prnjat w a poiru zehere rro sigrifuaru
~ zeo.'eld a~:
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Plamiuig Coum~ission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOIvIMEND t the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore adopt the Findings of Consistency Section 6. 2.
Ron LaPere, ChauYnan
Iake Elsinore Plauning Cominission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plannuig Comrnission at a meeting
thereof conducted on July 19, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Coiimussioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Commissioneis:
ABSENT: Conuivssioners:
ABSTAIN: Conmvssionexs:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-89
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE APPROVAL OF SPECIFIC
PLAN NO. 2004-O1 CHANGING THE ZOIVING
DESIGNATION OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED
NORTHWEST OF RIVERSIDE AVENLTE, SOUTHEAST
OF MACHADO STREET AND NORTH OF GRAND
AVENUE, BETWEEN ULLA AND TILLER LANES, FROM
R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICI' AND R 2
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO THE
COTTAGE LANE SPECIFIC PLAN UNDER THE ZONING
ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, Bart Homstein, Wesco Homes, has submitted an application for the Cottage
Lane Specific Plan. The approximate 12.04 acre site is located northwest of Riverside Avenue,
southeast of Machado Street, and north of Grand Avenue, between Ulla Lane and Tiller Lane from
R 1 Single Family Residential Distria and R 2 Medium Density Residential Distria to the Cottage
Lane Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Plamiuig Commission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for approval of Specific Plans;
and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plazuvng Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on June 21, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Pluiuing Coiim~ission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Cominission has considered the proposed Specific Plan No.
2004-O1, prior to malwig a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the Cottage Lane
Specific Plan, and change of zoning designation. The Pluuung Coimivssion finds and determines
that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-02 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the
requiremenu of the California Environmental Qualiry Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental
effects of the Specific Plan, based upon the following findings and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Plam~uig and Zoning law and the Ciry of Lake
ELsinore the following findings for the approval of Specific Plan No. 2004-O1 have been made as
follows:
The location and design of the proposed development shall be consistent with the goals and
policies of the City's General Plan and with any other applicable plan or policies adopted by the
City.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
COTTAGE LANE SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 200401
Page 2 of 3
17~e Coua~ Lar,~ SpxificPlan ~ts tlae C'uy's SpazficPlan criteria for mntern a~xl ra~uir~l irr~ler~uaution ~
th~ Geraeral Plan establish~l by Sation 65450 ~ sm. ~the Califrnnia Gacerrorern Ca~e ayel Sation 17.99 ~
the Cuy g~Lake Elsinore Maanapal Cale A~j~ the proposal Spaific P(an is im m~ezmeixe ~ceixh tl,~
d~ja2i~s ~'tlae Ger,~ral Planarxl tlae purpase ~'tlae pla~arangdistrict in zeliid~ tlaesixe zs loazta~
2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general
welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the Ciry,
or injurious to property or improvemenu in the neighborhood or the City.
Tl~ C~ta~eLa~ Spaif'icPlan ~aill rrot F,e deCri~rerual to th~e hezlth, saf~y crnr~'ort orger.~ral zeelfaYe ~tlae
persons residing or eaorking reear the projat ama or zeithin the City; rror zeill it Fx i~yuriw~s to pmperty ar
i~nazerrerns in tlaepmjaz ama ar wrhin tlae Cit~ In additiory staff lxu substamiataz'tlaat all applisable City
Depart~rents andA~rx'~es haze l~naffordaa'tl,~ oppomrraty fora thorough n~iece~~tJae Sp~cPlanared Ixa~ce
irxnrparatelall appliozbde mnarents aml/ar mreditirna mlata~ to installation a~xl mzirnename ~7aralscapir~
stra~ d~i~ations, r~gulatzons ~poirrts gfze~iuular ingras and ~ZSS a~xl com~ gfpareruicd rnsisartt~, so as to
elirranate arry ne~ztize i~acts to tlaegw~-al hpalth, saf~ls ~or5 ar~-al zeelfare ~'the surrnurxling
~aeigh~ ar tlae Cztyc
3. The site for the proposed Cottage Lane Specific Plan is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the use, and for all the subdivisions, yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping,
buffers and other features required by Title 17 of the LEMC.
71ae proposa~ C.atage Lar,~ Spai~icPlan has l~z d~igrxzl in cmaideratio~z gFtl~e size a~xl shape ~tbe properz~
therebY SrrenBtl~eniy~g araa' enl~a~zng tlae irrare~liate rrsiderreial amc~ 77~nse zssues, stamlanls, g~idelir,~, etc, yra¢
addressal in the Ccetabe La~ Spa~fic Plan zeill rezert to tbe C'uy Murridpal an~' Zrndng Cale in effaz at the
tirre future de~lOp»pm is proposal Fu~tl~e, tl~ projat as propose~ 7aill c~le~rettt tlae qual'uY ~~~~8
decelop~rent ared zeill cr~ate a zisHally pleasin~ nrnzcfet~-adize yelacionship l~tze~rz tlae propasal a~xl exzsting
prajaxs, in that the prapas~el uce has Ixt~z recierattl w axsure ade~uateProzrswn ~SC~alnB from tlaePublu n~s-
g~'rauy rn"acl ac~u prnperties•
4. This project complies with the design directives contained in Chapter 17.99 and all other
applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
The prvpase~ pmjat is appro~nzate to thesite arxlsu~ir~g ~ in that tlae prnj~ zaill crna~truct
si~farialy d~i~oa~el u~nzs in aavrdanee zazth appropriate dezelo~nreiu a~acl designsta~xJarzls amtain~ in tlae
C~ta~La~ Spaz~u•Plan 7?ae projat cmates irne~st arxl zttrying vstas as a person rrmg alonganyprojat
stra~ Thz proj«t also cvrrg~lerreras zJae qual'uY ~~~~8 ~8hl~rin8 decel°Pm~u aml ~eill amtinue to prvzide
zisr~ally pleasingdaign ared aro'~it~ture zaixhin the inrre~iatear~cr.
5. The site for the proposed use relates to streeu and highways with proper design both as to width
and type of pavement to carrythe type and quantiryof traffic generated bythe subject use.
The pmpasaz' Cottage Lan~ SpazfuPlan has !~n reaerzc~l as to its ~elation to the zeidth and type ~Paze~rerrt
~ to curry tlae type ar,el9~Y ~~'~'b~~ in that tlae C'uylxrs ade~ately erttluatal tl~e parernral
irrq~acts assaiate~l zvxh tlae p~rop~al uses prior to its apjnvzttl arall.~as ~uior.~l tlae projat to l~ serc~l by
~~~~I~t~ ~Pacu~' aml dc~ignstareda~s to procide rrasonable aaess by rar, t~zrdz, tra~ai~ a~xl bic~de
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
COTTAGE LANE SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2004-O1
Page 3 of 3
6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.99 of the LEMC have been
incoxporated into the approval of the Cottage Lane Specific Plan to insure that the project
continues in a il~aeuier envisioned by these findings.
Punreasrn to Sazion 17.99 (Sp~i~rcPlanApprour~ Derrial arxlMal fuatzons~ ~tlae LakeElsiyroreMur¢¢pal
Ca~e (LEMC), tJ~e propasal Co¢ta~ La~ae Spxif'zc Plan has l~z sd~ali.dal for mresic%ratiore a~xl app~vu:l ~
thePlanning Crnrnrassirnt
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above f' ' gs, the Plamiuig Corcunission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECONIME t 'ry Council of the Ciry of Lake
Elsinore approve Specific Plan No.2004-01.
Ron LaPere,
Lake Elsinore Plaznzing Couunission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plazuiuig Couuivssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on July 19, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Conunissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Coxnmissioners:
ABSENT': Coi7unissioners:
ABSTAIN: Coiruivssioners:
A'
. nrauy, ~ecretap/ to
Conurnssion //
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-90
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LAI~ ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 32996 WHICH SUBDIVIDES 12.04 ACRES OF THE
COTTAGE LANE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA INTO 48
RESIDENTIAL LOTS
WI IEREAS, Bart Homstein, Wesco Homes, has submitted an application for Tentative Tract
Map No. 32996 which subdivides 12.04 acres of the Cottage Lane Specific Plan into 48 residenual lou.
Tentative Tract Map No. 32996 is generally located northwest of Riverside Avenue, southeast of
Machado Street, and north of Grand Avenue, between Ulla Lane and Tiller Lane; and
V(~IEREAS, the Plaiuiuig Conunission of the Cityof I.ake Elsinore has been delegated with the
responsibility of makuig reconmiendations to the City Council pertaining to the subdivision of land; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Coiiunission has
considered evidence presented bythe CommunityDevelopment Department a~d other interested parties
at a public hearing held with respect to this item on June 21, 2005.
NOW TT~EREFORE, the Planning Coiiuivssion of the Cityof Lake Elsinore DOES F3EREBY
RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plannina Coiiui~ission has considered the proposed subdivision, Tentative
Tract Map No. 32996, prior to making a decision to reconunend that the City Council approve the
proposed subdivision. The Plamiuig Conunission finds and determines that Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 2005-02 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California
Environmental QualityAct (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effecu of the Cottage Lane Specific
Plan and Tentative Tract Map No. 32996, based upon the following findings and deternunations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Califomia Subdivision Map Act and requiremenu
of the Caty of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 32996
have been made as follows:
1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for the design and improvement, are
consistent with the General Plan; Zoning Code; Title 16 of the Municipal Code relating to
Subdivisions; and the State Subdivision Map Act.
The dcsigiz ~ the su(xlizision arel daaity ~ 3.99 d~caellang uruu per aaz ayz anazsteru zeith thz Ger.~ral Plan
desigratirna ~LorvMa~iurrcarxl Mafir~rra daaity re;ider¢ia~ ialiid~ aarnr~rtr~ates Yzsidern~al derzloprr~¢ up to 6
a~xl 12 dceelling rmitt per acre ~p~ti~ TJae projar is cweistan zrith tlae designatal land use plarming a~y
decelop»Pr2 a~xl design sta~adarzls, and all dlaer appr~riate rtr~uirorer¢s cvntai~l in tl~ Gereral Pla~y C~tabe
La~ Sp~ifzcPla~y, a~xl Sa~xlivsionMap Act
2. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs
specified in the General Plan (Govenunent Code Section 66473.5).
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
TENTATIVE TRACI' MAP NO. 32996
Page 2 of 2
TJae prnjat zs crneist~rt zrith tlae larxl zse plary decelop~reru aml daign sta~,a'ards arxl prvara~, arxl all ~her
a,v~r~riate ra~uirernryrts mntazr,e~l in the Ger,~ral Plary ar,a' C~ta~e La~ Spaifu Plan As dis¢eue~ th~e Ger,~ral
Plan dESignate the projat siie as L ozvMe~iimz and Me~iumDaaiLy ResidenCiaL 7he Cata~e La~ Spazfu Plan
daignazec tbe projat sire as SFD 4000 (Si~e Fanaly Density Raidential, mninzmz 4,000 square fax lotJ. Tract
Map Na 32996 is mraisteru zvith th~e SFD 4000 designaliwz aredapplirubJe dere~irer2 a~xl daigzstayrlareLs.
3. The effecu this proposed subdivision is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the
public service requiremenu of iu residenu, and the auailable fiscal and environmental resources have
been considered and balanced.
The projsx is mr~sister2 uith the City's Gen~-al Plan and Zaring Cal~ ~c¢ill prouc% rx~sary public se~zices arxl
faalztie~, zeill pay all appropriate f~s, ared 2aill rroE rezdt in a~zyac~ierse emirorrrrerrtal irr¢'xrd
4. The design of the subdivision provides to the greatest extent possible, for future passive or nanual
heating or cooling oppomuuties in the subdivision (Governnient Code Section 664123~.
77~e projar ~carll crnr~Oly zeilh all appmpriate m~aeruztion rc~tdmrrents ~the Cityarxl UrriformBuilding Cale
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above fin s, the Planning Cominission of the City of
Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECONIIvIEND tha the 'ty Coy~c~ the City of Izke Elsinore
approve Tentative Tract Map No. 32996. C~
Lake Elsinore Planning Conunission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plam~uig Coimnission at a meeting
thereof conducted on July 19, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Commissioneis: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
Cocnnvssionets:
Commissioners:
Commissionexs:
A Bndy; Secn
e Conunission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-91
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE QTY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNQL OF THE
CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE APPROVAL OF
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-06 FOR THE
COTTAGE LANE SPECIFIC PLAN
WHEREAS, Bart Hornstein, Wesco F3omes, has submitted an application requesting Design
Review approval of a four-unit model home complex, productions uniu, and recreational facilities
within the Cottage Lane Specific Plan. The approximate 12.04 acre site is located northwest of
Riverside Avenue, southeast of Machado Street, and north of Grand Avenue, between iJlla Lane
and Tiller Lane; and
WHEREAS, the Plannuig Conunission of the Ciry of I.ake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of inakuig recommendations to the City Council for approval of Residential
Design Reviews; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Pluuiing Coimnission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on June 21, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECI'ION 1. The Plamiuig Cocxunission has considered the proposed Residential Design
Review No. 2005-06, prior to making a decision to recommend that the Ciry Council approve the
Cottage Lane Specific Plan, and change of zoning designation. The Plamiuig Cominission finds and
detemunes that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-02 is adequate and prepared in accordance
with the requirements of the California Environxnental Qaality Act (CEQA) which analyzes
environmental effects of the Specific Plan and Residential Design Review, based upon the following
findings and detern~inations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake
Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Residential Design Review No. 2005-06 have
been made as follows:
1. Subject to the attached conditions the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any
significant adverse environmental impacu.
Staff has d~zrnar.~l that this projat is cmazstern wxh tlae Catage Lan~ Spsxfu• Plan ared Tentatize Trad Map
Na 32996. MiPigzt~l N~gztzze Da~aration Na 2005-02 prvzida acle3~ate erccironrrernal deararze ayxl
a~l~szs far thrs pro[xsea' Dgign Rezierm application In additzor~ app~vzul ~ this Design Recierm appliration
7aill assist in ad~iecing th~e deielopm~n ~' a~l-E+z(ane~l ared fimetiorwl ~~ msider2ia~ cunvre~
i~st~ia~ open sPac~ r~rpatzonal ayel i~atituc'wnal laral uces as zeell as ernasraging irdust~ial lared uses to
dizersifyLakeElsiyrore's avnorrac&ase
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-06
Page 2 of 2
2. The project complies with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the General Plan and the
Cottage Lane Specific Plan, as approved.
As diswsse~ zJae Ger.~ral Plan designates the proja2 site as Loze~Malium ar~el Maa'ium Deraity Residerniul
The Coua~ Lun~ Sp~:fic Plan dsignates tl,~ projat site as SFD 4000 (Sin~e Fa~raly Der~sizy Resideruia~
nararretm 4,000 squarz fax lat). Tract Map Na 32996 arel the propasez' ma'el hrnre mrr~lex ayel pmG.uzion
urrits are crnazster2 zeith the SFD 4000 designatzon aral applirable c%relopneru a~xl design sta~xlarrls. In
additiory tlae deresity ~tlae pro[~asal prajat is cmaisterrt zaith tlae density ~the Ger,~ral Plan designatza~a.
3. This projea complies with the design directives contained in Chapter 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
71ae propasal projat zs appropr•iate to the site and surnnrr,ding derd~rrerus in that the proj~t ~ceill wrstruct
single~fanaly derad.~al urats in aavrrlame zeith approprrate dera'oprrpm a~el design sta~aclards corrtaim~l in tlae
C~attage La~ S~c Plan 7?ae projat creut~s irnerest arad zttrying vstus as a pe~son rrazes alor~g a~zy projat
stra~ 71~e projat a(so o~» ple~rerns the qual ~uJ' ~exzstin8 nei~lrnrin8 de~d~u and ~aill amtinr~e to prnzide
vsHa(ly~pleasi~ design and arohitature zeitlrin tlae C~tage Lan~ Sp~zf:cPlan ama
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guarazitees and evidence of compliance with conditions, ha~e been incoxporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the properry in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursr~arn to Satirnc 17.82.070 (Actio~z ~the Planning CorrarsssionJ ~the Lake Elsirrore Mraucipal Cale
(LEMC), the proposal Residernial Dgign Reaeze~Na 2005-06, ~tl,~ Catage La~ Spaifzc Plan l~as Ix~rc
sd~alHlez' far araideration arxl app~vuzl by the Planni~ Convrauion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMIv1END that the City Council of the Ciry of Lake
Elsinore approve Residential Design Review No.2005-06.
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plaiuung Conuivssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on July 19, 2005 bythe following vote:
Lake Elsinore Plamiuig Conuiussion
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-06
Page 3 of 2
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTES .
1
Conunissioners:
Comnvssioners:
Commissioners:
Conunissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
ert A. Brady, ecrE
aiuiing Coiiunission
RESOLUI'ION NO. 2005-92
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAE~, ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-07
FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A"DRIVE-THROUGH
FACILITY" LOCATED ON PAD "12" OF PLANNING
AREA 4, OF THE CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE.
WHEREAS, Noli Calingo, Gensler Architects, has initiated proceedings to request the
approval of Conditional Use Pemut No. 2005-07 for the establishment of a"Drive-Through
Facility" to be located on Pad "12" of Planning Area 4, of the Canyon Fiills Nlarket Place; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Permits; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plam~uig Cominission
has considered evidence presented by the Communiry Development Deparunent and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on July 19, 2005.
NOW TI~REFORE, the Pluuiing Conunission of the City of I.ake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plaunuig Comnvssion has considered the proposed Conditional Use
Permit 2005-07 prior to approval. The Planiiuig Cominission finds and deternunes that the
Addendum to the 1989 Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan Environmental Impact Repon, which was
prepared in accordance with Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, provides the necessary
environmental clearances for the proposed application, based upon the following findings and
determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Plamiuig and Zoning law and the City of Lake
Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-07 have been
made as follows:
1. The proposed use, on iu own meriu and within the context of iu setting, is in accord with the
objeaives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is
located.
In orzler to ad~iece a ~eell bzlar,r~el arnl furaxional ~~' r~~derrtta~ m»vrercia~ i~lustria~ op~n spac~
ra~rational arnt i~atitutional (and uses, staff lxrs thorar~ghly eurlHatsa l tlae laml use mrrg~atibility; nois~ tra~ic aral
atl,~er er~irorrrrental hazanls Yelutel to tlae pr~pasal Comf'uional Use Periraz for the estabdish~rent ~'a "Drize
Throas~i Faality" lcratal on Pad "12" ~'Pla~rni~Ama 4, ~the Car~m H'~Ils Marhet Place A~~
the propasal larxl use is in a»acc~rmrxe ~aixh the ahjxtizes of tlae Ger,~ral Plan a7ad tlae Pur~se ~t~ae Plannin~
distrut in zehid~ the sire is lcrata~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2005-07
Page 2 of 3
2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general
welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the Ciry,
or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City.
In uarnzl ~ceixh tlaepu~~nses ~tlae CYxcpter 17.74 (Cor~l'rtional Use Pernala~ ~tlae LakeElsinrneMunicipal
Caa~ the City rralizal tlxtt thep~v[rasa~ Corulixional Use Penr~t for tlae ~stablishrrent gFa `I3rize~7lnroargh
Faality» loratxl onPad "12" ~PlarrrungAma 4, ~the CanynnH~lls Ma~zet Plcue mry lxaze a parer¢ial to
n~ZtccelY ~rrg'iact the ~fare ~perso~a r~sidi~ or zern~zing zeithin th~e r~i~ilx~rlrocel or tlae City Considering this,
staff has substanliatEd that all upplirable City Departmms ayelA ge~ haze lx~z afforz~l th~e oppo~tuYrity for
a tl~orough reziezv~'t!~ use a~xllxaze imorporatal all applirable mrrments ard/or mra(itions relatEd to
iratal/ationarul mzirnena~e ~la~aclsrapin~ st~ da~iratirna, ~gulat'wrrs ~Poarns ~ze~iicz~lar ingmss arxl cgress
a~xl mrnrr~ ~parzrrcral rnasa~, so as to elinanate a~zy r~gztize i~acts to tlaeger~-al laealth, saf~ apr9`or5 rn"
ger~ral zea'fare ~tlae samrouurxling n~ig~iGrorhe~l or the Czt~e
3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all
the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required by Title ll
of the LEMC.
71~e proposal Car,a'itior~rl Use Perrret for the etabdishrrerrt g~a "Drize~7l~gh Faality» loratal on Pad "12"
of Pla~rringArra 4, ~tlae Carryrnc Hills Market P(ace has l~z design~i' in mrzsideration ~the size arel shape
~ th~e Prol~ert~ ~a~j' St~tI~TL'z8 a~xl er~zrning the inmx~liate mriarenial ama Furtl~e , tJae projax as
propose~' zeill cmrr~iile~reru the q~al'uy ~eeisting decelopn~nt aral zeill cmute a vs~ally pleasin~ rmn-den-actize
relatzonship ~z the propasa~ a~ad exzsting proj~ts, in that t!~ p~apcsa~ use h~s Jx~n reuerc~l w erisure
ad~atelrrozrsion ~scr~rds~g from the pubdu ri~irs_of'~ett~'rn'acl~acernPrope,•tie•
4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width
and type of pavement to carrythe type and quantityof traffic generated bythe subject use.
TJae propasal Corx(izional UsePernat far the establzslment ~a "BriieTl~rnu~i Faalizy" laratel onPad "12"
gFPlanrri~Ama 4, q~tttl~e Ca~z}rnzH'rlLs Markex Pluce luts l~ri rerieceeel as to its mlation to the zeidth a~xl type
~Paze~rent n~elxl to rarry tlae type arel Ruay2it~y ~traffic8er~rata~ in tlz~t tlae City lxrs ada~uately eurla~atal
the pa¢ernial i~aus assodccte~l zeith the prnpasal usg prior to its app~v:ul arrl has mrd'uzor,~d tlae proj~ to l~
serr~l by mrds ~'ade3Hate capaczryarxl desigrastandarrLs to prozide masonal~eaa~s by car, cnrdz, tra~ai~ arxl
bec~de
5. In approving the subject use located on Pad "12° of Plannuzg Area 4, of the Canyon H'ills
Market Place there will be no adverse affea on abutting property or the pernutted and norm~l
use thereof.
77~e propasa~ use has !~z thoracsghly rezieraal arxl m~aditior~ezl by all appli~e C'uyDepart~rerns arel o~usicfe
Agerxrg, eliyr¢rating the potential forarryaaxl all ad~cerse effs~s on tlae abuttingpropen~
6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.74.50 of the LEMC have been
incoiporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Pernut to insure that the use continues in
a inaiuier envisioned bythese findings for the term of the use.
Puisr~am to Satiorz 17.74.050 (Adirnz ~'tlae Pla~ming Co»viassionJ ~tlae Lake Elsirrore Muraapal Ca(e
(LEMC), tlae proposal Cor,dztior~al Use Pemat for the establzshrr,~u ~a "Dri~Tbrou~i Faalit,~' lorate•l on
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2005-07
Page 3 of 3
Pad "12" ~Planrring Ayra 4, ~th~e Ca~zyrnx Hrlls Mark~ Place lxu lx~n sd~alr~la~l far a»aideration aml
aPProzul ~thePla~rir,g Corrmassion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Platuiing Coisurvssion of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Conditional Use Pern~it No. 2005-07.
Ron LaP , Chairn~uz
Lake Elsinore Plamiuig Conuivssion
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Pluuiuig Corcunission at a meeting
thereof conducted on July 19, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Cocxunissionets: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Coiiunissioners:
ABSENT: Coininissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-93
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CONIMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-05, FOR A
"DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITY" LOC',ATED ON PAD "12"
OF PLANNING AREA 4, OF THE CANYON HILLS
MARKET PLACE
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Ciry of Lake Elsinore by Noli Calingo,
Gensler Architects, to request a Commercial Design Review No. 2005-05 for a"drive through"
bank facility building totaling 4,400 square feet on .79 acres of vacant land; and
Wf-IEREAS, the Planning Coiiuivssion of the City of Lake ELsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of u~akuig recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the Design Review
of industrial projects; and
WF3EREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plamiuig Comnvssion
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested pamies at a public meeting held with respect to this item on July 19, 2005.
NOW TI-~',REFORE, the Pluiniug Comnvssion of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECI'ION 1. The Plauuuig Conunission has considered the proposed request for the
Commercial Design Review No. 2005-05 prior to making a decision to recommend that the City
Council approve the proposed "drive through" bank facility. The Plamvng Conmiission finds and
determines that the Addendum to the 1989 Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan Environmental Impact
Report, which was prepared in accordance with Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines,
provides the necessary environmental clearances for the proposed application, based upon the
following findings and detexrninations;
SECI'ION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will complywith the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
TJae pmpasal Corrarercial Design RetieivloratErl on Pad "12" ~PlarmingA~ra 4, t f th~e ~t~zyrnz HiUs Mark~
Place cmr~lies zeitb tlae~rds aml abj~tiu~ ~tl,~ Ger,~ral Pla~ in tlz~t tlae approurl gFthis "drize tliraugh" &znk
faality zeill assist in ad~ieiing tlae dec~p»~nt ~'a zeell-bzlam~l aaxl fi~rzarrnral nax ~r~idencic~ amvre~va~
iydztst~ia~ o[~z spac~ ramational ara~l instinuional la~xl uses as ieell as e~xaur•aging i~xlusmal lared uses to
dize~sifyLakeElsiyrore's avnrnr¢c&ase
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
PLANNING CONIMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
COMIVIERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-05
Page 2 of 3
77aepropasal CrnrmerzralDesignRezietvlcrataz~onPad "12" ~'P(anrringAma 4, ~tlae ~rryrnzHiUs Mark~
Place is app~apriate to the site a~n'suna.~ling derdop»pats in that tlae propasal "drize tlnnugh" &znk faciluy
lxu Jx~iz design~l in a~aicleration ~tlae size arxl shape ~theNDP'~ ~1' ~tzn8 amerest ared7ttrying zistas
as a person ~ along tJae stn~G Furtlaer th~e pmja2 as propasa~ ~ceill am~lerrent the qualuy ~erzstzng
deidoprrera a~xl zeill cmate a vsr~ally pleasin~ ~cl~r-actize mlcuioreship l~tcecen th~e prvpcsal arxl eeisting
prajars in that tl.~ atidiitarural ds~igrg cdorarad rrttterial ami site d~igrs projxisal eciderxe a mr~n frn" qual'uy
ars~' ari~zt}
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in anysignificant adverse envirorunental impacts.
TGae Adclemlunz to tlae 1989 Final Ca~z}an Hills Sparfu• Plan Enaronrrernal I~act RgoorS zahid~ zuu
jm~araz' inaamdunee ~eith Sazion 15164 ~tlae State CEQA Cnuileli~, prozides th~e r,~essary enci~vrm~ual
dearam~s far the propasal applicatio~a. A~y~ staff'Z~lieus tlae propasal applicatirnzs i~lenern tlae lar~l
use d~j~izg ared ra~rirerrents ~the Sj~ezfu Plan a~xl finds that fi.crther erzzironrrentul eurluation is tl.~r~or~
~saryc
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guazantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuam to Sazzo~z 17.82.070 (Action ~the Plamring Corrom'ssiorr~ ~the Lake Elsirrore Mzaaiapal Cale
(LEMCJ, the pmpasal Corrarercial Daign Reci~w loratal on Pad "12" ~Planrring Arza 4, ~tl~ Canyrm
H'rUs Ma~lzet Place lxrs l~z sd~(al for mnside~-ationarad approwl by tJ~ePlanning Cormr~ssion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plannma Conunission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMIVIEND TO TI~ QTY COUNQL APPROVAL of
Design Review for Commercial Project No. 2005-05.
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plannuig Conunission at a meeting
thereof conducted on July 19, 2005 bythe following vote:
Lake Elsinore Plamiuig Commission
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-05
Page 3 of 3
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Cominissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
Coimivssioners:
Coumvssioners:
Conuivssioners:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-94
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF
FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH SECTION
6.1.2 OF THE MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT
CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) FOR THE
PROJECT KNOWN AS "ALESCO SKY PARK
BUSINESS PARK".
WHEREAS, a site specific focused survey for Narrow Endemic Plant and Criteria Area
Species and Bunowing Owl survey is required by Section 6.1.2 of the Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSCHP) for the purpose of developing an industria] business park; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore evaluated the consistency of the project with the
(MSHCP); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendation to the City Council adopting the Findings of
Consistency with the MSHCP; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered and approved the request by staff on July 19, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE as follows:
The Biological Survey Report prepared by Pacific Southwest Biological Services, Inc.
has been prepared, submitted and reviewed in accordance with requirements of the
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The report is complete and
adequate in iYs evaluation of all environmental effects of the project known as "Alesco
Sky Park Business Park" project and will not preclude the implementation of the MSHCP
goals, based on the following finding;
FINDINGS-MUTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN
1. The proposed project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution that must make an
MSHCP Consistency finding before approvaL
Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Resolution, because the proposed project requires a
number of discretionary approvals from the City and is subject to CEQA review, it must
be reviewed for MSHCP consistency, which entails for the proposed project determining
whether it is subject to the City's LEAP process and whether it is consistent with;
Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool
Guidelines (MSHCP, ,¢ 6.1.2), Protection ofNarrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines
U:\rpreisendanz\I 2004-08 Sky Park Business Park\PC RESO MSHQ'.doc
PLANNING CONIMISSION
MSHCP RESOLUTION
Page 2 of 3
(MSHCP, § 6.1.3), Additional Survey Needs and Procedures (MSHCP, ~¢ 6.3.2),
Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines (MSHCP, ,¢ 6.3.2), Vegetation Mapping (MSHCP,
~ 6.3.1) reguirements, Fuels Management Guidelines (MSHCP, ~' 6.4), and payment of
the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee (MSHCP Ordinance, ~ 4).
2. The proposed project is subject to the Joint Project Review process.
Although, according to the Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), the
footprint of the project site is located within the Elsinore Area Plan, an agreement with
the County of Riverside (dated February 4, 2004) regarding the "back basin" excluded
the project site from any required conservation areas and is therefore not subject to the
City's Lake Elsinore's Acquisition Process (LEAP) process.
3. The proposed project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools
Guidelines.
No Riparian, riverine, vernal pool/fairy shrimp habitat and other aquatic resources were
identified on the proposed project site. As a result, no further MSHCP analysis or
conservation measures are required. The proposed project is therefore consistent with
the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools Guidelines.
4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species
Guidelines.
According to the Biological Assessment entitled "Corydon Street-Skypark Narrow
Endemic Plant and Species and Burrowing Owl Habitat Assessment" prepared by
Pacific Southwest Biological Services, Inc. on February 28, 2005, Narrow Endemic
Species do not occur on site. The proposed project is therefore consistent with the
Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines.
5. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures.
The project site falls within the Burrowing Owl Survey Area. However, according to the
"Corydon Street-Skypark Narrow Endemic Plant and Species and Burrowing Owl
Habitat Assessment" prepared by Pacific Southwest Biological Services, Inc. on
February 28, 2005, habitat for the Burrowing Owl does not occur on site. The project is
therefore consistent with the Additional Survey Needs Reguirements.
6. The proposed project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines.
The proposed project is not contiguous to any proposed MSHCP Conservation Area. The
proposed project is therefore consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines.
7. The proposed project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
The vegetation of the entire project site has been mapped. This mapping is sufficient
under the MSHCP and is consistent with the MSHCP.
U:\rpreisendanz\I 2004-08 SkyPark Business Park\PC RESO MSHQ'.doc
PLANNING CAMMISSION
MSHCP RESOLUTION
Page 3 of 3
8. The proposed project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines.
The proposed project is not adjacent to the proposed MSHCP Conservation Area.
Accordingly, the proposed project is therefore consistent with the Fuels Management
Guidelines.
9. The proposed project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development
Mitigation Fee.
As a condition of approval, the project will be reguired to pay the City's MSHCP Local
Development Mitigation Fee at the time of issuance of building permits.
10. The proposed project overall is consistent with the MSHCP.
The proposed project footprint complies does not preclude the implementation,
procedures, policies, and guidelines of the City's MSHCP Resolution and the MSHCP.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore adopt the Findings of Consistency Section 6.1.2
Ron LaPere, hairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on July 19, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL. GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
U:\rpreisendanz\I2004-OS SkyParkBusiness Park\PCRESOMSHQ'.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-95
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL
DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-08 FOR AN INDUSTRIAL
BUSINESS PARK LOCATED AT APN 370-050-013.
WHEREAS, Alan Young, Alesco Development Company LLC has initiated proceedings
for Industrial Design Review No. 2004-08 for the construction of an Industrial Business Park and
related improvements located at 370-050-013; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for Design Reviews; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on July 19, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION L The Planning Commission has considered the Industrial Design Review
No. 2004-08 prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the
proposed Industrial Building. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the East Lake
Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring Program (State Clearing
House No. 92092027) previously approved by the City Council is adequate and prepared in
accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which
analyzes environmental effects for final City Council certification, based upon the following
findings and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Industrial Design Review No. 2004-08
have been made as follows:
FINDINGS - INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan
and the Zoning District in which the project is located.
The proposed Industrial Design Review located at Assessor Parcel Number 370-OSO-
013complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan, in that the approval of
this industrial project will assist in achieving the development of a well-balanced and
functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and
institutional land uses as well as encouraging industrial land uses to diversify Lake
Elsinore's economic base.
U:\rpreisendanz\I 2004-08 SkyParkBusiness Park\PCRESO DRdoc
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION
DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-08
Page 2 of 3
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all
other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The proposed Industrial Design Review located at Assessor Parcel Number 370-050-013
is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the industrial project has
been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby creating
interest and varying vistas as a person moves along the street. Further the project as
proposed will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually
pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects in that
the architectural design, color and materials and site design proposed evidence a
concern for quality and originality.
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to
result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed Industrial
Design Review located at Assessor Parcel Number 370-OSO-013, as reviewed and
conditioned by all applicable City Divisions and Departments and Agencies, will not
have a significant effect on the environment pursuant to attached Conditions ofApproval.
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with
the objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed Industrial Design Review located at Assessor
Parcel Number 370-050-013 has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the
Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve Industrial Design Review No. 2004-08;
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
U:\rpreisendanz\I 2004-08 Sky Park Business Park\PC RESO DRdoc
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION
DESIGN REVIEWNO. 2004-08
Page 3 of 3
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on July 19, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
A
A. Brady, Secretary
g Commission /
U:\rpreisendanz\I 2004-08 SkyPark Business Park\PC RESO DRdoc
RESOLLTTION NO. 2005-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~, ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE APPROVAL OF MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DEQ.ARATION NO. 2005-02
WHEREAS, Bart Homstein, Wesco Homes, has submitted an application for the Cottage
Lane Specific Plan. The approximate 12.04 acre site is located northwest of Riverside Avenue,
southeast of Machado Street, and north of Grand Avenue, between Ulla Lane and T"iller Lane from
R 1 Single Family Residential District and R 2 Medium Density Residential Distria to the Cottage
Lane Specific Plan; and
WF3EREAS, the Cottage Lane Specific Plan No. 2004-O1, Tentative Traa Map No. 32996,
and Residential Design Review No. 2005-06 together comprise the "project" as defined by Section
21065 of the Califomia Environmental Qualiry Act (CEQA), Cal. Public Resources Code
Section 21000 et seq., which is defined as an activity which may cause either a direct physical change
in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the envirorunent and
which includes the issuance to a pexson of a lease, pernut, license, certificate, or other entidement
for use by one or more public agencies; and
WI~REAS, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-02 has been prepared to evaluate
environmental impacu resulting with the project; and
WI~REAS, the Placuiuig Conui~ission of the City of I.ake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of malflng recoiiunendations to the City Council for approving Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 2005-02; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said applications has been given, and the Plannuig
Coinnvssion has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and
other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on June 21, 2005.
NOW Tf-IEREFORE, the Plaiuung Coimnission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 2005-02, prior to makuig a decision to recommend approval to the City Council.
The Planning Coiiuivssion finds and deternunes that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-02 is
adequate and prepared in accordance with the requiremenu of the California Environmental Qiality
Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effecu of the Specific Plan, based upon the following
findings and detennuiations:
SECT'ION 2. That in accordance with State Plaeu~uig and Zoning law and the City of Lake
Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Miugated Negauve Declarauon No. 2005-02
have been made as follows:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2005-02
Page 2 of 2
1. Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before a
proposed mitigated negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would
avoid the effecu or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effecu would
occur; and
7he applifarn has mrde miisirna to tlae prnjaz oriz~s agr~l to sp~zfic arraditiora zoliid~ zeaddawid tlae ~'a7s ar
rrntigzte tbe effaxs ~the projax m a jwirtc zel~z ro significarll e~s ~ld azur.
2. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the agency, that the
project as revised may have significant effea on the environment.
Pursuam to the eciderxe raeizttl in tl~e light cf'the zalia~e r~orzl presaua~ to staff'tlae projat zeill nn¢ lxize a
sigr~rar2 ~fst on the enrzrorvr,er2 crnaidering th~e applirable Cordiiwia ~Approuzl ayacl Miti~t'wra Mrniuoring
Program
3. Mitigauon measures have been required to ensure all potenually significant impacts are reduced
to levels of insignificance.
Miti~ztion nrasures haze Ix~z re3uir~l zehid~ zvll raluce sigrrifrrarn enu~vnrrernal irrq7ads to the lerel ~
iraigrrificame
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above fin ' s, the Planning Conunission of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMIVIEND that the ' uncil of the Ciry of Lake
Elsinore approve Specific Plan No.2004-01.
Ron L re, Chairman
Lake ELsinore Planning Conunission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planniug Coinmission at a meeting
thereof conduaed on July 19, 2005 by the following vote:
AI'ES: Cominissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Comnvssioners:
ABSENT: Comnvssioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTE T:
obert A. Brady, Secre to the
Pluuiuig Comnvssio
RESOLUI'ION NO. 2005-96
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 403 POTTERY
STREET - APN 374-072-019.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Mr. Preciado
requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for a Single-Family Residence located at 403 Pottery
Street; and
WI3EREAS, the Plannina Coimnission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Minor Design Review requesu for Single Family Residential Projects;
and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Coi7uivssion
has considered evidence presented by the Communiry Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on August 2, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Comiiussion of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECI'ION 1. The Planning Coizunission has considered the proposed design for the single
family residence and has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code and the I~'istoric Elsinore Architectural Design Standards. Additionally, the subject
Minor Design Review has been found to be exempt from further environmental clearance under
Section 15303, Class 3(a); (Necv Co~atruction ar Core~ersion ~ Sm~ll St~zutures), of the California
Environmental QualiryAct (CEQA).
SECI'ION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will complywith the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
Tl~e propasal Mirror Design Rczieca~ lorittal at 403 Pa¢te~y Str~t mrr~pli~,s zeixh tJae garLc and d~jatizes ~tlae
~iCY~/'dl P~CLYl~ ZiZ ZJ7RL Z~?2 Ct~7~JYO7lYl ~fj7~2 iS7L~C~/,,K'C~/74t~ QSS75C ZYL Ql~JZeLtilg [J?2 C~CZPl0~7YYL'Y!C (~d 'L~ ~Yd~ dYK.~
~Z#~LZ077~YYd% (~YCS7A~C)?l7Ali Q7YI7YIPInd~~ ZYK~usu~uy 0~25~)C1Q'i Y~Y~QiZOYlC1~Clid.~' tYrSIlIZfl1017A~~Cli3,~' 2L56CCS'1P~Cd5
erx~uraging tlae der~lopmmt and rmir¢ename ~a braxd raa~e ~l~sing types far all inm»~ gra~ps arxl age
rate~rig•
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The jno[~osal Minor Design Reiiermloratez' at 403 Pottery Str~t is appropriate in the size a~xl design in thaz tlae
~siderKe ieill currq~le»ent tlae qtial'uY g~eezsting de~Opm~¢ ayxl zaill cmate a zisreally pleasing yrorrdeeracti~te
mlaxionship L~lzec~n tl~e propasal aml ecisting p~vjats. 7?ae ard~itatural desigry az~or ayel mzterials j~mp~az'
eec~z'tlae size ared design ~the horres in tl~esu»w~rxfinga~
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-96
AUGUST 2, 2005
PAGE 2 OF 2
3. Subject to the attached Condiuons of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacu.
Pursua~u to tlae (iulifrnma E~zcirnrrrrental Qual~uyA¢ (CEQA), th~e propnsa~Mir,orDesignReaEwlcratel a~
403 Porte~y Stra~ as n~cieia~el a~acl mred ~iCior~l by all appluable City Divsio~a and Departm~us and A~rxza,
ieill rrot lxa~ce a sign~~uarn ~'ax on the ercrimmrerrt pursuarn toArtide 19 (Catc~vricul Exerrq~tions) ar,d Sation
15303(a); (1Vcw Conscn.rdio~z ar co~tte,sion ~Smzll Scnurcar~J.
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Purs~ant to Sazzon 17.82.100 (MiYror Design Reziece) ~the Lake Elsiyrore Muracipal Gxle (LEMCJ, the
prop~sl Minor Design Recier~lorat~l at 403 Pottery Str~t haze (x~n sda~dylal arad cmaiderttl far appmuzl by
the Plamairg Corrm$ssiaz
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Minor Design Review of a single family residence
located at 403 Pottery Street (APN 374-052-019).
Ron LaPere, Chairxnan
Lake Elsinore Plamiuig Cominission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Conuivssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on August 2, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER, FRANQA
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Ro n A. Brady, E
P:\MDR OF A SFR @ 403 7
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-97
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR TWO
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IJNITS LOCATED AT
16766 AND 16772 JOY AVENLTE- APN 379-191-007 & 008.
WF3EREAS, an application has been filed with the Ciry of Lake Elsinore by Mr. Wesselink
and Matriac Development, are requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for two manufactured
S~~ le-Family Residences with an attached two car garage located at 16766 and 16772 Joy Avenue;
WHEREAS, the Planning Coirunission of the City of I.ake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Minor Design Review requesu for Single FamilyResidential Projecu;
and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plam~ing Comuvssion
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on August 2, 2005;
NOW TI-IEREFORE, the Plamung Comu~ission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECI'ION 1. The Plaziuuig Comnvssion has considered the proposed design for the single
family residence and has found it acceptable. The Plazuiuig Commission finds and detemvnes this
project is consistent with the I.ake Elsinore Municipal Code. Additionally, this project has been
found to be exempt from further environmentai review pursuant to, Section 15303, Class 3(a); (Neze~
ConslnuTiore ar Conzersion ~Smill Structums), of the Galifomia Enviroxunental Quality Act (CEQA).
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will complywith the goaLs and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The proposaz' Mi~- Design Rerzecv la~aza~l at 16766 a~xl 16772 Joy A~enue cwrq~lia 7rixh the garls arnl
abjaxizes g~tttl~e Ger,~ral Plary in tlaat tlae approuzl ~the r~idenez ~ezll assut in ad~iecing the d~zeloprrent ~a
zeell-Zalam~l aml fi~tional rrax ~r~sidentia~ rorrorerzia~ iaxlustria~ o~ert spuc~ ra~ational ared i~atitutional
la~acl uses as zeell as erxnuraging tlae dezeloprrent aml mzi~uena~ ~a brcad ra~e ~har~s~ng hPa}~arall irxrnre
graups aml age cat~rics.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
Tbe proposal Miawr Design Reciezv lcratal at16766 a~' 16772 Joy Azerure is approprrate in t1~ size a~
design in that the r~siderem zvll o~rrq~ilerreru the qa~al'uY ~exzsting dea~pm~at and zeill cmate a zisuallYP~~
rrora-da~-actize mlatio~ahip l~aceri tlae prvposal aml erzsting projats. 77ae ardiitatural desigrg ax~aram' yrttterials
propase~ eeca~l tlae size and design ~tlae herr,~ in Jae saaywazling ama
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-97
August 2, 2005
Page 2 of 2
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Purs~arn to tlae Citlifornia E~ztiron»errtal Qr~al'uyAd (CEQA), the projxisa~Minrn-Design Reiiere~ltratal a~
16766 a~acl 16772 Joy Azern~e as nziere~l and mrelixior~el by all applirablz Ciry Dizzsiazs and Depart~rerrts
arnl A~er,eia, zvll Yrot haze a sigrrificay¢ ~a2 on the azrimrrrreat pzasuaru to Artzde 19; (CcuEgoriral
Exerrq~tio~aJ ar,el Sation 15303(aJ; (1VecvConstruction ar Coraenion ~Small Srnrctur~c~.
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incoxporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pu~ssuam to Sation 17.82.100 (Miyror Dgign Reueu~ ~the Lake Elsirror~ Murricipal Ccde (LEMC), tlae
propasalMiyrorDesigiz Reriervlcratez'at 16766 arad 16772 JoyAze~nre l~zze J~rz sdaal~lal a~xl cmaiderttl far
dPProzttl ~'Y the Planning C',orraression
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Coimnission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Minor Design Review of a single family residence
with a second unit located at 16766 and 16772 Joy Ave ue APN 379-191-007 & 008).
Ron LaPe , Chaun~an
Lake Elsinore Plaiuiing Conuivssion
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plaunuig Conmvssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on August 2, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER, FRANQA
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
A
P:\MIJR OF TWO SFR @ 1676~& 16772 JOY S'I~PC RESO 5-02-OS.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-98
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~, ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 110 MANNING
STREET- APN 375-084-021, 022, and 023.
WI~',REAS, an application has been filed with the Ciry of I,ake Elsinore by Mr. Raul
Corvera requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for a Single-Family Residence located at 110
Maxuvng Street; and
WHEREAS, the Plamvng Comnussion of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of approving Minor Design Review requests for Single Family Residential Projecu;
and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Cominission
has considered evidence presented by the Communiry Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on August 2, 2005; and
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Coinmission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plannuzg Commission has considered the proposed design for the single
family residence and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and determines this
project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. Additionally, this project has been
found to be exempt from furrher environmental review pursuant to Section 15303, C1ass 3(a); (Nezv~
Caiatrru~ion ar Conzersion ~Sm~ll SCrucYUres), of the California Environmental QualityAct (CEQA).
SECI'ION 2. That in accordance with Ckiapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning Distria in which the project is located.
Tlae propasal Mirmr Dgign Reue~lcratal at I ZO Ma~nring St~t c~lics zeith tl~e ~cals aml ahjatizes ~the
Ger,~ral Pla~y in that the apprnrttl ~tbe resttfer,~ zeill asszst in adnezir,g the detdoprreru ~a zeell-&ala~l ayxl
fz~aonal rrax ~~sider2iu~ cnna~rnia~ i~adttst~ia~ open spuc~ r~rr~aziarurl ars:l irstit~~rtirnYrl la~acl uses as ~eell as
erxan-aging tl~e d~celopr~at a~xl mziruenarx~ ~'a bread rar~+e gFhatsing ty[aes far all ir.evrre groups ayxl a~e
rat~gories•
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
Thz proposxl Minor Design Reuece~ lcrat~l at 110 Manrring Strt~t is appropriate in the size arxl daigiz in tl~zt
tlae n~iderxe ~rill o~rrq~lznrnt tJae qHal'u~' ~eezstraag dec~prrent ayxl7rill create a zisually plecrsin~ nrnz-cl~ractzee
relatio~ahip l~lze~rc tlae propasal crnd eeisting projsis. Tlae ard~it~rtural deigr; cdor arxl ~raterials propasa~
excarl tlae sizeayxl desig~z ~the ho»~ in tlae surnxrrx~ga~
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-98
AUGUST 2, 2005
PAGE 2 OF 2
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adveise environmental impacts.
Pursuaryu to the Califomia Ercrironrrental (~al~uyAd (CEQA~, the przpasalMirrorDgignReciecvlcrat~el a~
110 Manrri~ Strat as n~iezeal ared a»~litiar.~l by all applirable City Dizisiar~s a~xl De~artnents aya'
A~, ~eill rro¢ haze a signifuarn effat on the erezi~vrrrrer2 purs~aru to A nide 19; (Cat~oriml Exe~rg'itiores)
ara~' Sazion 15303(a); (NervCorestrydion ar Corere~sion ~Smxll Strzrcucros).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including
guaiantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the propeny in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursa~arn to Sazion 17.82.100 (Miyror Desig~z Reriece~ ~tlae Lake Elsiaaore Mzancipal Cale (LEMCJ, tlae
propnsal Minrn- Design Rer.i~w loratal at 110 Manning St~ lau2e Ix~ri sd~d~elal a~ad crnaider~l for approurl
by tlae Planni~ Co~rmassion
NOW, TI IEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plannuig Conunission of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Minor Design Review of a single family residence
located at 110 Nlannuig Street (APN 375-084-023).
~~
Ron LaPere, C~lairrnan
Lake Elsinore Plaiming Conuivssion
I herebycenifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Plazuiing Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on August 2, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER, FRANQA
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Commission
A SFR~ 110 Ma~uw~g Strket\4505 PC RESO.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-99
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. 33525 "FOR CONDOMINIUM
PURPOSES"
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by J&S
Development, LLC, to request approval of a Tentative Parcel Map "For Condominium Purposes"
for the establishment of a coimnercial and limited manufacturuig business park and related
improvemenu; and
WI-IEREAS, the Planning Conunission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of makuig recoiiunendations to the City Council pertaining to the subdivision of
land; and
WF3EREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plaeuiuig Comtnission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on August 2, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Plam~uig Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plazu7uig Conuivssion has considered the proposed subdivision ('TPM
No. 33525), prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed
Tentative Parcel Map "For Condominiuxn Purposes" for the establishment of a commercial and
limited manufacturing business park. The Planning Coinnvssion finds and determines that this
project is exempt from the requiremenu of CEQA, pursuant to Section 15332.6 (In-Fill
Development Projecu) which exempts infill projects 5 acres or less.
SECI'ION 2. That in accordance with State of California Subdivision Map Act, and the
Ciry of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 33525
"For Condominiuxn Purposes" have been made as follows:
The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for the design and improvement, are
consistent with the General Plan; Zoning Code; Title 16 of the Municipal Code relating to
Subdivisions; and the State Subdivision Map Act.
The projat is mnsisteru zaith tlae designata~l larxl use plantti~ ama, der~loprreru aral daign standarsls, arxl all
arlaer appro~rriate ra~uire~rents cmuai~l in tl.~ Ger,~ral Pla~y ZoninB C~ C~tY MuniaPal Ca~ and
SulxlizisionMapArx
2. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and
prograrns specified in the General Plan (Govenunent Code Section 66473.5).
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-99
PAGE 2 OF 2
Tlae projaz zs caszstem zeith tlae la~xl zae plary dec~opm~n arxl design stayelards a~xl pr~rarr~, arxl all a~h~-
app~apriate re~uirerrcrrts crnvairxrl in tJae Ge~ral Plan
3. The effecu this proposed subdivision is likelyto have upon the housing needs of the region, the
public service requiremenu of its residenu, and the available fiscal and environmental resources
have been considered and balanced.
Tlae proja2 zs crnazsterrt zzith the C'aty's Ger~ral Plan ayel Zrnring Ca'~ -cai(l prozide r,e~sary public sercttes a~xl
faalitza, zeill payall appropriate fces, aYxl zeill ~ result in arryadzerse e~ziironrrerrtitl iyrq7ad
4. The design of the subdivision provides to the greatest e~nent possible, for future passive or
natural heating or cooling opportuniues in the subdivision (Government Code Secuon 664123).
77ae pmjat zei/l crn~ly ~aith all appm[rriate crnaervuiarz re~ui~reru.s ~'the C'uyared UniformBuildang Cade
NOW, 'IY-IEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Plaiu~uig Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMIvIEND that the City Council of the Ciry of Lake
Elsinore approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 33525 "For Condominium Purposes".
Ron aPere, Chau•n~au
Lake Elsinore Plaiuung Comiivssion
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plannuig Conunission at a meeting
thereof conducted on August 2, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Conurvssionexs:
Comnvssioners:
Commissioners:
Cominissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER,
FRANQA
i
obert A. Brady, S•etaryto the
Plannuig Conui~is. 'on
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-100
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE QTY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-02, TO BE
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
MINTHORN AND CHANEY STREETS FOR A PROJECT
KNOWN AS JSrS DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS PARK
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by J&S
Development, LLC, to request a Design Review of Industrial Project No. 2005-02 for a Commercial
and Limited Manufacu.iruig Condominium Business Complex consisting of ten (10) buildings
totaling 58,654 square feet; and
WI~',REAS, the Plam~ing Cominission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of makuig recommendations to the Ciry Council pertaining to the Design Review
of industrial projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Coinmission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public meeting held with respect to this item on August 2, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Plaiuvng Coinmission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Comn~ission has considered the proposed request for the
Industrial Project No. 2005-02 prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council
approve the proposed commercial and limited manufacturing business complex. The Pluu~uig
Comcnission finds and detemunes this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
and that this action is exempt from the requiremenu of the Califomia Environmental Qi.iality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to Seaion 15332.b., In-FillDeceloprremPmject.s;
SEG"i'ION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will complywith the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The proposal I~/usCrial Desigrt Reueiv laratal at tl~e rrortbnecst amx~- ~Mi~vhom a~xl C~aan~y Strerts cmr~lies
zeixh t!~ gaals a~xl d~jatizes ~' th~e Ger,~r•al Pla~ in tbat tlae approurl ~' this mrrnn~~ial a~ad li~rattd
yrttrnrfacturing busi~s o~lex zeill asszst in ad~ierz~ tJae de~elop»pm ~a ~va'l-balarxal ayel fi.azct'wnal ~~'
residernia~ mrrorercia~ ind~stria~ opeiz spac~ rs.r~ational a~xl irstixytional la~xl us~s as zeell as erec~ra8in8
in~strial lar,el uss to dizenifyLakeElsirrore's avrrorrac• base
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-100
PAGE. 2 OF 3
TGae propasa~ In~iat~ial Design Reiierm Icratal at tlae rarrtlnegt co~r,~r• ~'Mimhnm ared ~xn~y Str~ts zs
apprnpriate w tJae sixe arnl sunwer~'i~ d~o~r~s in that tlae,mzpasa~ corraren~al arxl liyratal rranufactzaing
busir,gs cmrq~lee has lx~re dgigr,~~ in mr~sideratiarc of tlae size arxl shape g~tlaePr~enls tbemb~' crazting irnerest
and zttryirg vstas as a j~son nvzes along tlae stra~ Furtlaer tl.~ projaz as p~vposal ~ceill mrrg~lerrer2 tlae qualuy
gf erzsting dera~opm~n a~xl zeill cmate a zisa~al~y pleusin~ non-d~ractize Yelatirnahip l~czea~z tlae propcxsal aml
eeistingprojars in that tl.~ aro'ats2ural desigrg az~oran~l mzterial a~acl site d~ig~a p~vposea' euderxe a mre~nz far
qual'uy arel ari8ir~rlit}c
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursr~ctrn to tlae Califarrna Enzirorvr,er~ual Q~al'uyAd (CEQA), tbe pmjxsall~st~ial Daign Retiecv~larcttaz'
at tlae rrorthceest mmer ~'Mirnborra arxl C~ia~y St~s, as n~ier¢al arel mred'uior.~l by all applirala~e C'uy
Dizisions ar,d Depart~rents a~'A~rsiz~, zeill Yrot haze a sigrafu~arn efJ'«t on the er~irorrrrern purszuant to A>tide
19 (Categorrcal Exemptions) a~xl Sarion 15332 (In-Fill DevelopmentPmjects).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incotporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuarn to Sazion 17.82.070 (Actirnz ~tlae Pla~rir~g Corro~a'ssior~ ~tl~ Lake Elsirrore Muraapal Cale
(LEMC), th~e pro[xsal Inaust~ial Desigri Retiecv lcratal at the yrorthu~.st corr,~r af Mirnhrnn arad Cxiar~y
Str~ts has lx~izsd~alyla~l for arr~sideration and appravzl by thePlamring Convrnssion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plamvng CoiYUnission of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMIVIEND TO THE QTY COUNQL APPROVAL of
Industrial Design ReviewNo. 2005-02.
Ron LaPere, Cllairman
Lake Elsinore Pluuiuig Conmvssion
I herebycertifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Plaiuring Conuivssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on August 2, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Coimnissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER,
FRANQA
NOES: Conunissionexs:
ABSEN"T: Couunissioners:
ABSTAIN: Conmvssioners:
RESOLLTTION NO. 2005-
PAGE. 3 OF 3
ATTEST:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-101
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~, ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR TWO (2)
SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED DWELLINGS LOCATED
AT 1i7 PROSPEG"I' STREET - APN 373-151-009
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Ciry of Lake Elsinore by Hector and
Veronica Hernandez requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for two (2) single-family
attached dwelling uniu pursuant to Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter ll.66 (Parking
Requirements) and Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code (LEMG~ and the I~'istoric Elsinore Architectural Design Standards; and
WI-IEREAS, the Plam~uig Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of approving Minor Design Review requesu for Single Family and Muki Family
Residential Projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plann~ a Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on August 16, 2005.
NOW TIIEREFORE, the Plamvng Conunission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plam~uig Conunission has considered the proposed design for the single
family residence and has found it acceptable. The Plamung Coininission finds and detetmines that
this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the I~'istoric Overlay District
and is exempt from further environmental clearance under Section 15303, C1ass 3(a) (New
Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act
~~QA)•
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
FINDINGS
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
77ae pro[~asaz'Mirror Design Rever~ loratal at 137 East P~pat Str~t czm~lia zeith the ~xrds and d~je~tizes ~
tJ~ Ger~ral Plary in that tlae app~vual ~'tl~e singl~farraly ~rsiderKe zeill assist in ad~ieang tl~e dereloprrern ~'a
~eell-lazlama~ a~xl furxtional rrax ~~sidernia~ mrr~enza~ i~dustr'ra~ open spac~ n~mat'wrerl am' in,ti~iorral
land uses as zeell as erxnuraging tJae dec~era ayal ~rttirnenance ~a brazcl ran~ ~hous~ng ty~}~arall ineorre
grm.rps arrcl age rat~rnies.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-101
August 16, 2005
Page 2 of 2
7?ae propasal Minrn- Dgign Reuecv Jorcrxed at 137 East P~nspxz Strt~t is appropriate in th~e size a~xl
su»amding dezeloprreru in tlx~t tl,~ tzeo (2) single~farialy attadxzl dzeelling unirs zeill corrq~lerrern tlae qualuJ' ~
eeistzng decelop»rnt a~xl zvll cmate a zisually pleasir~ rrortcl~ractize mlationship l~z the pro[xual ared
eeisting prajaxs in tlxtt the a~ural desigry a~orarxl mzterials propczsal rn~t ar eec~xl tlae size and dsiSre ~
tlaehont~ in tlaesurrozaxfingaraz
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacu.
77ae propasal Mirror Dgign Reuer~ lorat~rl at 137 East Praspa~ St~ as miiereEel and coreditirn~d by all
applirabde C'uy Diusions ared Depart~r2s aaxl A~rtt~, zaill n~o¢ laaze a sigrrificam ~t on tl.~ er~ciromreiu
purs~ara to Artide 19 (CatEgoriral Exerrr~iitions~ aml Sa2iaz 15303, C7ass 3(aJ (Nerv CaasP~uctiarz or
C',rn~ce~sion gFSmrll Srrzrv~sres) ~the Califrn~aia E~zcirorrrrernal Qual'uyAct (CEQAJ.
4. Conditions and safeguards piusuant to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including
guaruitees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the properry in accordance with the
objeaives of Chapter 17.82.
Minor Design Reriere~ ~tzeo (2) si~fa~rdly attad~el cl~¢elling rants larrtal at 137 East Pmspxs Str~t has
l~iz eurla~atal pursz~arn to Saxio~z 17.82.100 (Minor Deign Reziera~ ~the Lake Elsirrore Muraapal Cale
(LEMC) arnl all a~l~i- applirable Sa2zor,s g~the LEMC The pmjax zuu farmxl w l~ in mrrg'iliarze zvxh all
~zrlations aml d~jezizes ~LEMC
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Pl Coinmission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Minor D sig Revie for o(2) single family
attached dwelling units located at 137 East Prospect Streert\.
Ron LaPere,`~'kia;n„a.,
Lake Elsinore Plaunuig Comnvssion
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plaiuung Coiniiussion at a meeting
thereof conducted on August 16, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Coiiunissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, FRANQA, GONZt1I,ES,
LARIMER
NOES: Conmiissioners:
ABSENT: Conunissioners:
ABSTAIN: Cocmivssioners:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-102
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH
SECTION 6.1.2 OF TAE MULTIPLE SPECIES
FIABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) FOR THE
PROJECT IDENTIFIED AS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
N0.31957
WHEREAS, consistency with the MSHCP is required and a site specific focused survey
for Narrow Endemic Plant Species is required by Section 6.1.2 of the Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSCHP) for the purpose of a Tentative Tract Map; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore evaluated the consistency of the project with the
(MSHCP); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendation to the City Counci] adopting the Findings of
Consistency with the MSHCP; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered and approved the request by staff on August 16, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE as follows:
A Habitat Assessment prepared by Thomas Leslie Corporation has been prepared,
submitted and reviewed in accordance with requirements of the Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The report is complete and adequate in iYs evaluation of
all environmental effects of the project identified as Tentative Tract Map No. 31957 and
will not preclude the implementation of the MSHCP goals, based on the following
finding;
FINDINGS-MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN
The proposed project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution that must make an
MSHCP Consistency finding before approval.
Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Resolution, because the proposed project requires a number
of discretionary approvals from the City and is subject to CEQA review, it must be reviewed
for MSHCP consistency, which entails for the proposed project determining whether it is
subject to the City's LEAP process, consistent with the Protection of Species Associated with
Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines (MSHCP, ,~ 6.1.2), Protection of
Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines (MSHCP, § 6.1.3), Additional Survey Needs and
Procedures (MSHCP, ~ 6.3.2), Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines (MSHCP, ,¢ 6.3.2),
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31957
Page 2 of 3
Vegetation Mapping (MSHCP, § 6.3.1) requirements, Fuels Management Guidelines
(MSHCP, ~' 6.4), and payment of the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee (MSHCP
Ordinance, ~ 4).
2. The proposed project is subject to the Joint Project Review process.
The footprint of the project site is located within an MSHCP Criteria Area, and therefore,
would be subject to the Joint Project Review process.
3. The proposed project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools
Guidelines.
No riparian, riverine, vernal pool/fairy shrimp habitat and other aquatic resources were
identified on the proposed project site. As a result, no further MSHCP analysis or
conservation measures are required. The proposed project is therefore consistent with the
Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools Guidelines.
4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species
Guidelines.
The project site does fall within the Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Areas. Therefore,
a habitat assessment was required for Narrow Endemic Plant Species. The proposed project
has been determined to be consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species
Guidelines.
5. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures.
The project site does not fall within the Burrowing Owl Survey Area. In addition, it was
determined that the species is not expected to occur on-site due to the lack of suitable
habitat. The project is therefore consistent with the Additional Survey Needs Requirements.
6. The proposed project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines.
Measures have been incorporated into the proposed project so that there will be no project-
related drainage, toxics, lighting, noise, invasives, barriers, and grading/land development
impacts to the Conservation Area. The proposed project is therefore consistent with the
Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines.
7. The proposed project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
The vegetation of the entire project site has been mapped. This mapping is sufficient under
the MSHCP and is consistent with the MSHCP.
8. The proposed project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines.
The proposed project has been designed to include landscape buffers near the proposed
MSHCP Conservation Area that will in essence act as Fuel Modification Zones. Within
these areas there will be fire-resistant, non-invasive plants. Accordingly, with these
measures, the proposed project is therefore consistent with the Fuels Management
Guidelines.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
TENTATIVE TRACI' MAP NO. 31957
Page 3 of 3
9. The proposed project wili be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development
Mitigation Fee.
As a condition of approval, the project will be required to pay the Ciry's MSHCP Local
Development Mitigation Fee at the time of issuance of building permits.
10. The proposed project overall is consistent with the MSHCP.
The proposed project complies and is consistent with all of the required procedures, policies;
and guidelines of the City's MSHCP Resolution and the MSHCP. The applicant has made
revisions to the project or has agreed to specific conditions, which would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects of the project to a point where no significant effects would occur.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore adopt the Findings of Consistency Section 6.1.2.
Ron LaPere, C airman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on August 16, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, FRANCIA, GONZALES,
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners: LARIMER
A. $rady, 9~ecretary tq~ t~Ie Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-103
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2005-06
WHEREAS, John Ford, Fortland Development Inc., has submitted an application for
Tentative Tract Map No. 31957. The approximate 34.2 acre site is located west of the Running
Deer Road and Mountain Street termini and north of the Lincoln Street terminus; and
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 31957 is defined as a"projecY' by Section 21065
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Cal. Public Resources Code
Section 21000 et seq., which is defined as an activity which may cause either a direct physical
change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the
environment and which includes the issuance to a person of a lease, permit, license, certificate,
or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies; and
WHEREAS, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-06 has been prepared to evaluate
environmental impacts resulting with the project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for approving Mitigated
Negative Declaration No. 2005-06; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said applications has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on August 2, 2005
and continued to August 16, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration No. 2005-06, prior to making a decision to recommend approval to the
City Council. The Planning Commission finds and determines that Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 2005-06 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effects of the
project, based upon the following findings and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning ]aw and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No.
2005-06 have been made as follows:
1. Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before a
proposed mitigated negative declaration and initial study are released for public review
PLANNING CONIMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2005-06
Page 2 of 2
would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects
would occur; and
The applicant has made revisions to the project or has agreed to specific conditions which
would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects of the project to a point where no significant
effects would occur.
2. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the agency, that the
project as revised may have significant effect on the environment.
Pursuant to the evidence received in the light of the whole record presented to staff the
project will not have a signifzcant effect on the environment considering the applicable
Conditions ofApproval and Mitigation Monitoring Program.
3. Mitigation measures have been required to ensure all potentially significant impacts are
reduced to levels of insignificance.
Mitigation measures have been required which will reduce significant environmental impacts
to the level of insignificance.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND th e City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2 OS-
. \
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on August 16, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERER, O'NEAL, FRANCIA, GONZALES
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners: LARIMER
AT ST•
obe A. Brady, Sec e to the
Planning Commissi
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-104
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 31957 WHICH SUBDIVIDES 34.2 ACRES
OF LAND INTO 101 RESIDENTIAL LOTS
WHEREAS, John Ford, Fortland Development Inc., has submitted an application for
Tentative Tract Map No. 31957 which subdivides 34.2 acres of land into 101 residential lots.
Tentative Tract Map No. 31957 is generally located west of the Running Deer Road and
Mountain Street termini and north of the Lincoln Street terminus; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Counci] pertaining to the
subdivision of land; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Deparhnent
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on August 16, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed subdivision,
Tentative Tract Map No. 31957, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council
approve the proposed subdivision. The Planning Commission finds and determines that
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-06 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes
environmental effects of the Tentative Tract Map No. 31957, based upon the following findings
and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State California Subdivision Map Act and
requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Tentative
Tract Map No. 31957 have been made as follows:
1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for the design and improvement, are
consistent with the General Plan; Zoning Code; Title 16 of the Municipal Code relating to
Subdivisions; and the State Subdivision Map Act.
The design of the subdivision and density of 2.95 dwelling units per acre are consistent with
the General Plan designations of Low Medium Density residential, which accommodates
residential development up to 6 dwelling units per acre. The project is consistent with the
designated land use planning area, development and design standards, and all other
appropriate requirements contained in the General Plan, Zoning Code, City Municipal Code
and Subdivision Map Act.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31957
Page 2 of 3
2. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and
programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5).
The project is consistent with the land use plan, development and design standards and
programs, and all other appropriate requirements contained in the General Plan.
The effects this proposed subdivision is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region,
the public service requirements of its residents, and the available fiscal and environmental
resources have been considered and balanced.
The project is consistent with the City's General Plan and Zoning Code, will provide
necessary public services and facilities, will pay all appropriate fees, and will not result in
any adverse environmental impact.
4. The design of the subdivision provides to the greatest extent possible, for future passive or
naturai heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision (Government Code Section
664123).
The project will comply with all appropriate conservation requirements of the City and
Uniform Building Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMME at the City ouncil of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve Tentative Tract Map No. 31957
Ron L ere, Chairm
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on August 16, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, FRANCIA, GONZALES
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners: LARIMER
PLANNING CONIMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31957
Page 3 of 3
A
A. $rady(Secret~r}~to the
ig Commission / /
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-105
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORrTIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-14 FOR THE
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND ESTABLISFIMENT OF A
TWO (2) STORY ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX AND
ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS, WITHIN THE HISTORIC
DOWNTOWN AREA
WI-IEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Hector Zubieta to
request the approval of Residential Design Review No. 2005-14 for the design, construction and
establishment of a two (2) stories attached residential duplex; and
WI IEREAS, the Pluuiing Comnvssion of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the
responsibility of recoinuiending approval of Design Reviews for residential projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Comnvssion has
considered evidence presented by Community Development Department and other interested parties at
a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 6, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Conuivssion of the Cityof Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE as follows:
SECI'ION 1. T'he Plaiuiuig Commission has considered the proposed request for Residential
Design Review No. 2005-14 and has found it acceptable. The Planning Comnvssion finds and
deterxnines that this project is consistent with the H~storic Lake Elsinore Architectural Design
Guidelines and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC~ and that no further environmental review is
necessarypucsuant to the California Environmental QualityAct (CEQA), Section 15332.
SEC'I'ION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review~ of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the project have been made as follows:
FINDINGS - DESIGN REVIEW
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project will be located.
Tlae pmpasal Residential Dsign Reuern~ at 219 He21d Azawe mrr~ilies zailh tlae gazLs a7xl abjatizes ~tlae
General Pla~y in that the apprvzttl ~'this DupleC prnjax ui/l assist in ad~ieung th~e derelopm~u ~a zeell-
balamsl arx~ firrxtiazrl ~~resideatial, mrmrerdal, iaadz~st~ial, ope~z spac~ mmatiorrrl arxl i~aiuzuional land
usa as udl as errcac~raging i~rlistrial la~al uses to dizersify Lake Elsirrore's enrrorrec &ue
2. T'he project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
T4ae prvpns~l Raicleruial Deign Retierr~ at 219 Heald Azoure zs appropriale to th~e sfte a~acl surr~lirag
deu~r~ar in that tlae Duplee projez has l~x desigr,t~l in crnaicleratirnx ~'tlae size arxl sl.etpe ~tlae Prr~percls
the~(~y' cmatz~~8 inten3t and zttrying zistas as a person rivzcs a(ong tJae stra2 Furtlaer the prnjsx as j~al z¢ill
mrr~leirent the qHal'uY ~eeisting der~t arel ~caill cmate a zisz~ally plecrsiazg, rro~x~de[ra~tize mlatiwahip
~a tlae prn~rasal a~xl eeisting prnjazs in tlxct the ard~ita7ural daigrg az~or and nauerials arrl site design
prn[xisalecidera~a mrrcemfarqual~uyars~ori8cralu~
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in anysignificant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuar¢ to tlae Califrnnia E~zciironrreatal ~al~itJ'Act (CEQA), tl~ j»t~saz'Rgider2ial DesigrzReaera~to Ix
lauxxlat 219 HezldAzenu~ as recierr~a~xl c~elitia~el byall appliarble CuyDizisiwa a~xlDePartrrents arxl
A~, ~carll nar /xaie a signtficam ~fat wz tl~ errcirommrn purs~ar2 to AYtide 19; ~CatEgo~ical Ex~r~tionsJ
and SEetiarc 15332, CYass 32; (In fill Decel~m~u P~vjaisJ.
4. Conditions and safeguards puxsuant to
guarantees and evidence of compliance
approval of the subjec[ project to ensure
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
with conditions, have been incoiporated into the
development of the properry in accordance with the
Pursuam to Sa2ron 17.82.070 (Actiwa ~tlae P(anrring CorrarassionJ ~tbe Lake Elsirrore Murricipal Cale
(LEMC), the pr~al Residential Dsign ReciervTxrs l~z sd~alulxl far cwsideratiaz arxl ap~nvwl ~'the
Plarming Cwrare'ssion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plaxuiuig Conunission of the Caty of
Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Residentia~l~HesiQn ReviewNo. 2005-14.
Iake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Coimnission at a meeting
thereof conducted on September 6, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Coimnissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANQA
NOES: Coinmissione~:
ABSEN'I': Coinuvssione~: LARIMER
ABSTAIN: Coinmissionecs:
ATTEST:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-106
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 30521 ADAM
AVENUE, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 375-342-009.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Mr. Raul
Corvera, requesting Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence; and
WHEREAS, the Plamiuig Commission of the Ciry of Lake ELsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of approving a Minor Design Review for Single FamilyResidences; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Conunission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 20, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Plannina Cominission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SEG"I'ION 1. The Plannuig Comn~ission has considered the proposed request for a Minor
Design Review for a Single Family Residence and has found it acceptable. The Planning
Conunission finds and detemunes that this project is consistent with Chapter 17.23 of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMG) and that this action is exempt from the requiremenu of the
California Environmental Qualiry Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303;
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
7?ae propasalMirrorDesignReaera~laatad at 30521 AdamAze~nre mrrplies -ceith tlae~rttls and d~ja7izes ~tJae
Ger,~ral Pla~y in that the approurl ~thi,s singlefa~ly ~siclerKe zeill usszst in ad~iecing the deceloprier2 ~a zeell-
Ealam~l ar,d fiau~ ~ional ~rrae ~'~sideruia~ wnar,eizra~ i~tria~ c~en spac~ r~ematiorc~l and inscitartzorrcd larxl
uses as zv~'l as er~axsraging tl~e deielopm~rt a~xl rmimena~xe ~a brcad ran~e ~hauszn$ ty~ for all i~xnrre
groups aml age catc~vries.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
Tlae propasal Mi~i-Dgign Reueca~ Icrataz' az 30521 AdamAzsn~e zs apprz~priate to the site ar,el s~srnxrr.ding
derelopm~rts in that tlae sar~gle fa~rely horre l.~as (x~ desigr.e~ in cmaiaeration ~ tbe size aYxl slxipe ~ tJae
PmP~i ~~' ~~8 irrtergt arxl uzryir~g zistas as a person rmzes along tlae st~ Furthe~- tJ~e projat as
ProPasa~ za:ll co»~~zrrern
RESOLUTION NO 2005-106
SEPTEMBER 20, 2005
Page 2 of 2
zJae qHal~uY ~eristi~ deca'opireru ayxl ~eill cmate a~cisually pleasing rond~-actize mlacionslrip l~re~rz the
propnsal a~xl eezsting projazs in tTxit tlae a~ural desigry cdor arxl rraxerials prop~sal exca~ls tlae size ancl
design ~tlae hrnrts in tl.~ surractr.dingamu,
3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of
compliance with conditions, have been incoiporated into the approval of the subject project to
insure development of the property in accordance with the objecuves of this Chapter and the
plannuig district in which the site is located.
Punuaru to Sation 17.82.100 (Mirror Design Rezieu~ ~tlae Lake Elsiyare Mzrrucipal Ca~e (LEMC), tlae
propns~l Mirear-Deign ReuervloratEel at 30521 AdamAzsn~e lxrs F,~rz sd~l~el ard mraidera~ far a,oprourl
by thePlanrting Caimrz'ssion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plamiiug Coimnission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE of the or Design Rev!~ w for a Single-Family
Residence located at 30521 Adam Avenue. ~ ~ / D ~
Lake Elsinore Plamiuig Conunission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plamiuig Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on September 20, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Conunissionexs: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZAI.ES, FRANQA,
LARIMER
NOES: Conui~issioners:
ABSENT': Conurvssioners:
ABSTAIN: Coimnissionexs
ATTEST: -
Robert~ Brad , ecretaryt e P~anni a Conuivssion
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-107
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CANIMISSION OF
THE QTY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 244 EAST HEALD
AVENLTE - APN 373-041-027.
Wf-~REAS, an application has been filed with the Ciry of Lake Elsinore by Mr. Juan
Reveles and Mr. Genaro Bravo requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for a Single-Family
Residence located at 244 East Heald Avenue; and
WE-IEREAS, the Plam~uig Cominission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Minor Design Review requesu for Single Family Residential Projects;
and
WI IEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plamvng Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 20, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Placuiing Conunission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Pluuiing Coiiurvssion has considered the proposed design for the single
family residence and has deterinined that the proposed project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code and the I~'istoric Elsinore Architectural Design Standards. Additionally, the subjea
Minor Design Review has been found to be exempt from further environmental clearance under
Section 15303, Class 3(a); (Necv Crnarru~ion ar C',rnzcersion ~ Smzll Sinrctures), of the California
Environmental QualityAct (CEQA).
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will complywith the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
71~e pmpasal Minrn-DesignReziEwloratal at 244 East HealdAzerwe a~r~'ilies ~eith tJae grals arad abjatizes ~
tlae Ge~-al Pla~y in that the ap[nvuzl ~'tlae residerKe zeill asszst in ad~ieiing the dereloprrent ~'a zeell-Jaalam~l
aml fura'zonal ~rax ~yesider2ra~ m»qrercia~ iydustria~ open spac~ rermational a~xl institut~or~al la~acl uses as
zadl as erxouraging tlae dec~'op~r~u ar,d ~rtti~uename ~a braxcl ran~ ~hauszn8 types }~or all irxnrre gra,os arxl
a~ cat~ones.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
7?ae prvposa~ Mirror Desig~z Reaeu~ Iaratal at 244 East Heald Azerure is approprrate in tbe size a~l deig~z in
that th~e r~iderxe zeill cmrq~lerrem th~e qual'uY ~eeisting dece~»eiu aml -ceill cyrate a zisz+ally pleasin~ ~z
delracciee relatirnahip ~ra tlae pro[rasal a~xl ~cisting projszs. 77~e ard»ta2ur•al desigry az~or a~acl rmterials
pmpcxe~ ecc~ tlae size a~acl daign ~'the horres in thes~srra.rrxlinga~
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-107
SEPTEMBER20, 2005
PAGE 2 OF 2
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant advexse environmental impacts.
Pursuar2 to the ~lifomia Eraironrrernal Quc~lityA~t (CEQAJ, tlae propasalMirrorDesig~zReiiermlaratala~
244 East Heald Azsn~e as reiiere~rl and mrr~'uior~rl by all applira&'e City Dizisio~a ared Departrrerns arxl
A~rxie, ~aill rrot lxaze a sigrufuarn ~at on tlae er~irornrern pursHam to Artide 19 (C'at~vrical Exerr~tzo~a)
a~xl Satiora 15303(a); (NecvCoratrycCion or Carezersion ~Smzll StrucCisres~.
4. Conditions and safegi~ards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including
guaiantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, ha~e been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursraam to Saxion 17.82.100 (Minrn- Dgign Reueu~~ ~tl~ Lake Elsirrore Mzmicipal GxJe (LEMCJ, tlae
pro~insal Mirror Daign Retierm lcratal at 244 East Hazld Azerure ha-ce !~z sd~ aml cor~sider~l for
aPProurl bY the Planni~ Convrassiaz
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plamzing Conunission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Minor Design Review of a single family residence
located at 244 East Heald Avenue (APN 373-041-027~,.~ ~
Lake Elsinore Plamung Cocmnission
I herebycertifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Plaiuung Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on September 20, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANQA, LARIMER
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
A. Brady, Sec"retarvto~kfe Plam~uie Commission
P:\MDR OF SFR ~244 HEALD AVE~ 20.05 PC RESO.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-108
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 16611 McPHERSON
AVENUE, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 378-203-058.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Mr. Jorge
Torres, requesting Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of approving a Minor Design Review for Single Family Residences; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on August 16, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for a
Minor Design Review for a Single Family Residence and has found it acceptable. The Planning
Commission finds and determines that this project is consistent with Chapter 17.23 of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and that this action is exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303;
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings for the have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and
the Zoning District in which the project is located.
The proposed Minor Design Review located at 16611 McPherson Avenue complies with the
goals and objectives of the General Plan, in that the approval of this single family residence
will assist in achieving the development of a well-balanced and functional mix of residential,
commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses as well as
encouraging the development and maintenance of a broad range of housing types for all
income groups and age categories.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The proposed Minor Design Review located at 16611 McPherson Avenue is appropriate to
the site and surrounding developments in that the single family home has been designed in
consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby creating interest and varying
vistas as a person moves along the street. Further the project as proposed will complement
the guality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive
RESOLUTION NO 2005-108
AUGUST 16, 2005
Page 2 of 2.
relationship between the proposed and existing projects in that the architectural design,
color and materials proposed exceeds the size and design of the homes in the surrounding
area.
3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence
of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject
project to insure development of the properiy in accardance with the objectives of this
Chapter and the planning district in which the site is located.
Pursuant to Section 17.82.100 (Minor Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
(LEMC), the proposed Minor Design Review located at 16611 McPherson Avenue has been
scheduled and considered for approval by the Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE of the M' or Design Review for a Single-Family
Residence located at 16611 McPherson Avenue.
`
Ronald LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on August 16, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN
ATTEST:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANCIA
Ro A. Bradv. :
Commissioners:
Commissioners
LARIMER
the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-109
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMNIISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORrTIA,
DENYING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR TWO (2)
SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENCES LOCATED
AT 316 & 318 TOWNSEND - APN'S 374-102-024
WI IEREAS, an application has been filed with the Ciry of Lake Elsinore by Solomon
Mishkaiuan requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for consideration of two (2) Single
Family Detached Residences pursuant to Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential
Development Standards), and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requiremenu) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code (LEMGj and the H~storic Elsinore Architectixral Design Standards; and
WHEREAS, the Plaiuiuig Comcnission of the Caty of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of approving Minor Design Review requesu for Single Family Residential Projecu;
and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Coimnission
has considered evidence presented by the Communiry Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 20, 2005.
NOW TT~REFORE, the Planning Cominission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plauning Cominission has considered the proposed design for the single
familyresidence and has found it unacceptable. The Planning Coirunission finds and determines that
this projea is not consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The projea was found to be
exempt from further environmental cleatance under Section 15303, Class 3(a) (New Construction or
Conversion of Small Stn.icti.ires), of the California Environmental QualityAct (C~',QA).
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the denial of this request have been made as follows:
FINDINGS
1. The project, does not comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning
District in which the project ~s located.
Tlae pro~iasal Mirror Design ReziEwlaratxl at 316 and 318 Tozenser~d Strc~t ~¢ill Yro¢ cmr~ily ~rixh Gazl 2.0 ~
tJae Ger~ral Pla~y in that tlae p~ro~xxaz'sir~gl~fa~rely Iwrrp ladzs tl.~ RztaluY ~ard~ita~ural daign ~uir~l by the
LakeElsirroreMuanczpal Gxle(LEMCJ aya'tl~HistoricElsinnreArrliiraturalDesignCrcridelirres.
2. The project does not comply with the design direaives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all
other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The j»ropnsal Mirror Design Rerierv lcratal at 316 a~xl 318 Tozenserrl St~ z¢ill ~aot cmr~ly zeith eixh~er th~e
design diratize mrnai~l in tlae Hzstoric Elsiazore Aydirzaxural Desigri Starx~anls ar the LEMC in that the
ard~itEeture proposal d~ ~ rr~t the dgign stanclanLs requira~
RESOLUTTON NO. 2005-109
OCfOBER 18, 2005
Page 2 of 2
3. Subject to Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any
significant adverse environmental icnpacts.
Coreditions g~'Appromllxsze n~ Ix~z pn~ar~l far Jae prajax crnesidering dae r~arrareredation ~'davaG
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including
guaiantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, will be incotporated into the approval
of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives
of Chapter 17.82.
Altl~acsgh ~itw~a ayel saf~arcls Ixa~ce n~ l~z i~ucla~ Minnr Design ReciEw ~ tzeo (2J sing~fa~raly
detadaal dzeelling r~rits loratxl at 316 aar,l 318 Toznaerxl Str~t, if/or 7alaera apprrna~ will be eurl~
pursuam to Sa~ion 17.82.100 (Minrn-Deign Reuezej of tl.~ Lake Elsirrore Mumapal Cale (LEMCJ aaacl all
atlaerapplicable Sattrons gftheLEMC
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Conunission of the Ciry
of I.ake Elsinore DOES HEREBY DENY Min esign ' w for TWO (2) Single Family
Detached Residences located at 316 and 318 To end.
Ron L ere, ai.man
Lake Elsinore Plaiuiuig Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Conuivssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on September 20, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Conuivssioners:
NOES: Comcnissione~:
ABSENT: Coma~issioneis:
2005-109, 316 & 318 Townsend 9-20.05 .doc
ABSTAIN: Cominissioneis:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-110
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANIVING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH
SECTION 6.1.2 OF THE MULTIPLE SPECIES
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) FOR THE
PROJECT IDENTIFIED AS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
N0.32786
WHEREAS, consistency with the MSHCP is required and a site specific focused survey
for Nanow Endemic Plant Species is required by Section 6.1.2 of the Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSCHP) for the purpose of a Tentative Tract Map; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore evaluated the consistency of the project with the
(MSHCP); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendation to the City Council adopting the Findings of
Consistency with the MSHCP; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered and approved the request by staff on September 20, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE as follows:
A Habitat Assessment prepared by Thomas Leslie Corporation has been prepared,
submitted and reviewed in accordance with requirements of the Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The report is complete and adequate in it's evaluation of
all environmental effects of the project identified as Tentative Tract Map No. 32786 and
will not preclude the implementation of the MSHCP goals, based on the following
finding;
FINDINGS-MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN
1. The proposed project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution that must make an
MSHCP Consistency finding before approval.
Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Resolution, because the proposed project requires a number
of discretionary approvals from the City and is subject to CEQA review, it must be reviewed
for MSHCP consistency, which entails for the proposed project determining whether it is
subject to the City's LEAP process, consistent with the Protection of Species Associated with
Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines (MSHCP, ~' 6.1.2), Protection of
Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines (MSHCP, ,¢ 6.1.3), Additional Survey Needs and
Procedures (MSHCP, § 6.3.2), Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines (MSHCP, § 6.3.2),
PLANNING CANIMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
MSHCI' CONSISTENCY OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAI' NO. 32786
Page 2 of 4
Vegetation Mapping (MSHCP, ~ 6.3.1) requirements, Fuels Management Guidelines
(MSHCP, ~ 6.4), and payment of the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee (MSHCP
Ordinance, ,¢ 4).
2. The proposed project is subject to the Joint Project Review process.
As described in Section 3.2.2, Project Impacts, pp. 3.2-14 through 15, of the Draft IS/MND
and the Biological Constraints Analysis, the Proposed Project site is located within the
Elsinore Area Plan of the MSHCP. The entire Proposed Project site is approximately 152
acres with only 2.5 acres along the northern boundary of the project site located within
MSHCP Criteria Cell 4157. Per the March 3, 2005 project site plan, Terra Cotta Road will
be extended to the project boundary, placing a 0.1-acre area of the road within Criteria Cell
4157. The remaining 2.4 acres of the Criteria Ce114157 would remain undeveloped. The
Lake Elsinore General Plan Circulation Element designates Terra Cotta Road as a
secondary road already planned for extension to Nichols Road. In addition, the MSHCP
identifies Terra Cotta Road as a`planned road" (Figure 7-1 in MSHCP). Section 7.3.5 of
the MSHCP, Planned Roads Within Criteria Areas, states that planned roadways are
"Covered Activities ". The MSHCP also states that Covered Activities "will receive Take
Authorization under the section 10(a) Permit and the NCCP Permit, provided these activities
are otherwise lawful. " MSHCP Def/Acr v(emphasis added). Because construction of Terra
Cotta Road is the only activity proposed in the Criteria Cell and construction of Terra Cotta
Road is a Covered Activity, joint project review (JPR) does not apply to the Proposed
Project.
In addition, the construction of Terra Cotta Road will only impact 0.1 acre of the 160 acres
in Criteria Ce114157, or 0.06 percent of the Criteria Cell. According to the cell conservation
criteria, areas in Cell 4157 to be conserved will be connected to habitat to the west and north
of the Criteria Cell, and the conservation goal for the Criteria Cell is 45-55 percent focusing
on the western half. The portion of the project site in the Criteria Cell is located in the
southern area of the Criteria Cell, not within the area to be conserved. Furthermore,
conservation in the portion of the project within the Criteria Cell substantially exceeds the
conservation goal since 2.4 acres of the 2.5 acre portion within the Criteria Cell (or more
than 95 percent) will be conserved and only 0.1 acre will be disturbed to construct Terra
Cotta Road..
3. The proposed project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools
Guidelines.
In the Draft IS/MND (including Section 3.2.2 and the Draft IS/MND MSHCP Consistency
Analysis, Appendix B), a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation
(DBESP) was prepared in accordance with the MSHCP Riparian/Riverine and Vernal Pool
Policy and was attached to the MSHCP Consistency Analysis as an Appendix. The
Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation will be provided under
separate cover letter to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of
PLANNING CAMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
MSHQ' CANSISTENCY OF TENTATIVE TRACI' MAI' NO. 32786
Page 3 of 4
Fish and Game prior to project approval for 60-day review consistent with the MSHCP. See
MSHCP 6-25.
4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species
Guidelines.
The MSHCP requires habitat assessments on the project site for the following narrow
endemic plant species; California orcutt grass, Hammit's clay-cress, many-stemmed dudleya,
Munz's onion, San Diego ambrosia, San Miguel savory, slender-horned spineflower,
spreading navarretia, and Wright's trichocoronis. These species were not detected on-site
during twelve focused botanical surveys performed between February 24, 2004 and June 12,
2005. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the Protection of
Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines.
5. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures.
As described in Section 3.2.1.4, Existing Conditions, p. 3.2-8 of the Draft IS/MND and in the
Biological Constraints Analysis, a habitat suitability assessment for the western burrowing
owl (BUOW) was conducted. In addition, although not required, searches were also made
for BUDW individuals and BUOW occupied ground burrows. No BUOYV individuals or
BUOW occupied ground burrows were observed on-site during twelve constraints analysis
plant and wildlife field surveys, and six focused coastal California gnatcatcher field surveys.
These surveys were performed on-site on April 10, May IS and June 12, 2005, and February
24, March 19, 25, Apri15, 12, 19, 27 and May 4 and I1, 2004. Eleven of the surveys were
conducted during the BUOW breeding season of two separate years. The Biological
Constraints Analysis documents the survey results for all species covered by the MSHCP
including the burrowing owl. The project is therefore consistent with the Additional Survey
Needs Requirements.
6. The proposed project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines.
Measures have been incorporated into the proposed project so that there will be no project-
related drainage, toxics, lighting, noise, invasives, barriers, and grading/land development
impacts to the Conservation Area. The proposed project is therefore consistent with the
Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines.
7. The proposed project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
The vegetation of the entire project site has been mapped. This mapping is sufficient under
the MSHCP and is consistent with the MSHCP.
8. The proposed project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines.
The proposed project has been designed to include landscape buffers near the proposed
MSHCP Conservation Area that will in essence act as Fuel Modification Zones. Within
these areas there will be fire-resistant, non-invasive plants. Accordingly, with these
measures, the proposed project is therefore consistent with the Fuels Management
Guidelines.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
MSHCP CONSISTENCY OF TENTATIVE TRAGT MAP NO. 32786
Page 4 of 4
9. The proposed project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development
Mitigation Fee.
As a condition of approval, the project will be required to pay the City's MSHCP Local
Development Mitigation Fee at the time of issuance of building permits.
10. The proposed project overall is consistent with the MSHCP.
The proposed project complies and is consistent with all of the reguired procedures, policies,
and guidelines of the City's MSHCP Resolution and the MSHCP. The applicant has made
revisions to the project or has agreed to specific conditions, which would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects of the project to a point where no significant effects would occur.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND tt~af ~the City CRun;il of the City of Lake
Elsinore adopt the Findings of Consistency Section 6. J~ 2. \ ~,y
Ron LaPe3'e, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on September 20, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANCIA,
LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
to tY~ Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-111
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2005-09
WHEREAS, Centex Homes, has submitted an application for Tentative Tract Map No.
32786. The approximate 151.78 acre site is located north of Lakeshore Drive, east of Terra
Cotta Road, and west of Riverside Drive; and
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 32786 is defined as a"projecY' by Section 21065
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Cal. Public Resources Code
Section 21000 et seq., which is defined as an activity which may cause either a direct physical
change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the
environment and which includes the issuance to a person of a lease, permit, license, certificate,
or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies; and
WHEREAS, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-09 has been prepared to evaluate
environmental impacts resulting with the project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for approving Mitigated
Negative Declaration No. 2005-09; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said applications has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 20,
2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration No. 2005-09, prior to making a decision to recommend approval to the
City Council. The Planning Commission finds and determines that Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 2005-09 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effects of the
project, based upon the following findings and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Mitigated Negative Declazation No.
2005-09 have been made as follows:
1. Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before a
proposed mitigated negative declaration and initial study are released for public review
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2005-06
Page 2 of 2
would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects
would occur; and
The applicant has made revisions to the project or has agreed to specific conditions which
would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects of the project to a point where no significant
effects would occur.
There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the agency, that the
project as revised may have significant effect on the environment.
Pursuant to the evidence received in the light of the whole record presented to staff the
project will not have a significant effect on the environment considering the applicable
Conditions ofApproval and Mitigation Monitoring Program.
Mitigarion measures have been required to ensure all potentially significant impacts are
reduced to levels of insignificance.
Mitigation measures have been required which will reduce significant environmental impacts
to the level of insignificance.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND hat the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve Mitigated Negative Declaration . 2 OS-0~
9'~-
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on September 20, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANCIA
LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-112
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 32786 WffiCH SUBDIVIDES 151.78
ACRES OF LAND INTO 386 LOTS
WHEREAS, Centex Homes, has submitted an application for Tentative Tract Map No.
32786 which subdivides 151.78 acres of land into 3861ots (369 single-family residential lots and
17 lettered lots). Tentative Tract Map No. 32786 is generally located north of Lakeshore Drive,
east of Terra Cotta Road, and west of Riverside Drive; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the
subdivision of land; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 20,
2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed subdivision,
Tentative Tract Map No. 32786, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council
approve the proposed subdivision. The Planning Commission finds and determines that
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-09 is adequate and prepazed in accordance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes
environmental effects of the Tentative Tract Map No. 32786, based upon the following findings
and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State California Subdivision Map Act and
requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Tentative
Tract Map No. 32786 have been made as follows:
1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for the design and improvement, aze
cons~stent with the General Plan; Zoning Code; Tide 16 of the Municipal Code relating to
Subdivisions; and the State Subdivision Map Act.
The prvj~t is crnaisteru zaith the designatal larad use planning a~a, derelop~reru an~' deign standards, aral all
arJaer ap[»npriate ra~uin~rrts cwuair,~l in th~e Ger,e~-al Pla~y Zorung Cal~ C'uy Mr~ttapal Cal~ and
SuErlizisionMapAct
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32786
Page 2 of 2
2. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and
programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5).
The prajax zs anazstein zezth the lared use pla~y der~prrern arxl d~ign stanlanls arxl proara~, aaxl all ovh~er
aPpropriate re~ui'enrnts cmuai~l in tJae Ger,~ral Plan
3. The effects this proposed subdivision is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the
public service requiremenu of iu residenu, and the available fiscal and environmental resources
have been considered and balanced.
Tlae projat is cmaistern ~eith tl~ Ciry's Ger.~-al Plan ayrl Zorring Ca~ zeill prozide r,~sary publicsera~ arxl
faalitzc~, zeill payall appropriate fa3, arxl zvll nn¢ r~r~lt in arryad2erse erc~ironrremal irrq~act
4. The design of the subdivision provides to the greatest extent possible, for future passive or
natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision (Govemment Code Section 66412.3).
77ae projax ~aill crnrg~ly zeith all appro~-iate crnzser•u:cion ~uir~r,eiats ~'the Ciryayxl UrdformBuildir~ Ca/e
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND ~ia the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve Tentative Tract Map No. 32786. ~~~~ V -`-
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on September 20, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANCIA,
LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
A
A. Brady, Sec~etary to the
RE SOLUTION NO. 2005-113
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 17765 SLTNNY SLOPE
AVENLTE.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Mr. Michael
Bennett, requesting Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence; and
WHEREAS, the Plamiuig Coimivssion of the City of I.ake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of approving a Minor Design Review for Single Family Residences; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plaunuig Conmvssion
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on October 4, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Comuiission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECT'ION 1. The Planning Comnvssion has considered the proposed request for a Minor
Design Review for a Single Family Residence and has found it acceptable. The Plazinuig
Coimnission finds and detern~ines that this projea is consistent with Chapter 17.23 of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMG~ and that this action is exempt from the requiremenu of the
California Environmental Q.ialityAct (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303;
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
17ae pivposal Minor D~ign Reuerv lcratez' at 17765 Sumry Slope Azerure cmr~ilia ~itb the gcaLs and
objati~ces ~tlae Gen~ral Pla~ in that the approual ~'this san~farraly residerxe zeill asszst in adnecing tlae
dez~olm~r2 ~a zeell-&~lane~l ayed fiazz ~ional ~~~cidencia~ ~r~r~aa~ induscria~ o[ren spac~ ~ational
aml instituczor~al laml uses as zaell as erxnuraging tlae decrlopm~a ar~d mzarrtenayxe ~'a braad ran~ ~hausraz8
ty[~}~arall i~xnrregmups a~xl age cat~xnies.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
77ae propasal Mirror Design Reaeu~ laratel at 17765 Sumry Slope Azerwe is appro[niate to the site arnl
surra~a(ir~g d~rms in that tlae si~le fa~rcly horre has F~z desigr,~l in mr~sicleratiwz ~tlae size and shape
~~ ProP~1~ ~Y ~~S irverest aml zttryir~g zistas as a person nazes along tlae st~G F~srtl,~r tl,~ proja2
as ~rropasal ~zll cwr~lerrent
RESOLUTION NO 2005-113
OCTOBER 4, 2005
Page 2 of 2
tlae qr~al'uY ~eeistzng dezeloprre~u arxl zeill cmate a zisa~ally pJeasi~ rron-cl~raccize mlatirnahip F~t~n tlae
prvpasal ayel exzsting projats in tlaat tlae a~ural desigrg cdor aaxl mzterials propas~rl eec~Ls tlae size arxl
d~sigri ~the horres in tbe sunw~xlingama
3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070,including gi.iarantees and evidence of
compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to
insure development of the properry in accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and the
plamiiiig district in which the site is located.
Puisr~a~rn to Sazzon 17.82.100 (Mi~- Design Reuerr~ ~tJae Lake Elsi~re Muracipal Cale (LEMC), tlae
jno[~asal Minrn- Desigrt Retiece~ lorcttal at 17765 Sumzy SIoPe Azeiute lxrs l~z sdxrfu(el a~acl cwzside~xl for
apprawl by t1aePlQanring Cairmassion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Pluiuing Conunission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE of t1~Ye~(Iuior D' n Review for a Single-Family
Residence located at 17765 SunnySlope Avenue. ~ ~ ~
Ron LaPere, Chairmari "
Lake ELsinore Planning Conunission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Piannuig Coimnission at a meeting
thereof conducted on October 4, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANQA,
LARIMER
NOES: Cominissioners:
ABSEN'T: Comuvssioners:
ABSTAIN: Conmvssioners
RE SOLUTION NO. 2005-114
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 30265 HILL
AVENiJE.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Mr. Raul
Corvera, requesting Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence; and
WHEREAS, the Plaiu~uig Conmiission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of approvmg a Minor Design Review for Single FamilyResidences; and
WF3EREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Coinmission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on October 4, 2005.
NOW TIIEREFORE, the Plamung Connnission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECI'ION 1. The Planning Comi7vssion has considered the proposed request for a Minor
Design Review for a Single Family Residence and has found it acceptable. The Planning
Commission finds and detemunes that this project is consistent with Chapter 17.23 of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code (I.EMG~ and that this action is exempt from the requiremenu of the
California Environmental QualityAct (CEQA) pucsuant to Section 15303;
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will complywith the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
7?ae propasal Mirror Design Reu~cv~loratal at 30265 H'zll Azerwe corrg~lia zeith tlae gcnls and ahja2iza ~'the
Gerae~-al Pla~y in that zlae appmu:l ~'this single~fanaly ~sider.ee zeill assist in adneung the derelopnrnt ~a urll-
&alane~l a~xl fim~iorwl ~~r~iclentia~ mnvr,e~zia~ iralust~ia~ open spac~ r~rmational arad iaatitucirnral (a~xl
uses as z¢ell as enear~ragi~ tlae d~lop»~nt aYa' mzi~mena~ace ~a brozd rar~e ~hausin8 types }~ar all inmrre
grvups arul a~e catEgaiies.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
Tlae propasal Mi~i- Dgign Rezierm lcratxl at 30265 Hill A~nte zs appropriate to the site ara~l sztrra~rxling
~ in that tlae single fa~ly hrnre has l~z deigr.t~l in mraideration ~'the size a~xl shape ~tlae
1~P'~1s ~j' ~~8 irnerest aml zuurying zistas as a person ~ alang tl,~ st~ Furtl.~er tl.~ projat as
propasaz' z~ll am~ilerrent
RESOLUTION NO 2005-114
OCTOBER 4, 2005
Page 2 of 2
the qual'u1' ~existing derelopm~u ared zeill cmate a zisr~al~y pleasin~ nwz-c%n-actize yrlatiarahip lxtzea~z th~e
jnvpasal aml eeistraagprajaxs in tlaat tlae amhixatu~-al dgigry aa~or arxl mzterials prop~al excc~ls the szze a~xl
desig~z ~the horr~ in tlaesurrorvadi~area.
3. Condidons and safeguards pursuant to Secuon 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of
compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to
insure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and the
plaiuiing distnct in which the site is located.
Pursuarn to S~ion 17.82.100 (Mirror Design Reuece~ ~'tlae Lake Elsiyeore Murriapal Cale (LEMCJ, tJ~
propasaz'MinnrDesigra Reriermlcrar~el at 30265 Hill Azern~e lxrs !~z sd~dr~lxl a~xl crnsider~l farapprourl by
th~e P(anning Crnrnrassiaz
NOW, '1T-~REFORE, based on the above Findings, the Piam~uig Conui~ission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES F3EREBY APPROVE of t~e, Minor Design~ew for a Single-Family
Residence located at 30265 E-fill Avenue. / ~~~
Lake ELsinore Plam~uig Conunission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plamiuig Cominission at a meeting
thereof conducted on October 4, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANQA,
LARIMER
NOES: Corxunissioners:
ABSENT': Coimnissioneis:
Cominissioners
Conunission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-115
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 30494 WHICH SUBDIVIDES 191 ACRES
OF LAND INTO 484 TOTAL LOTS IN THE CANYON
HIILLS SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
WHEREAS, BV Engineering has submitted an application for Tentative Tract Map No.
30494 which subdivides 191 acres of land in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan area into 484 total
lots including 434 single-family detached residential lots, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the
subdivision of land; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public heazing held with respect to this item on October 4, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION l. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed subdivision,
Tentative Tract Map No. 30494, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council
approve the proposed subdivision. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the
Addendum to the Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan EIR is adequate and prepared in accordance
with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes
environmental effects of TTM 30494.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State California Subdivision Map Act and
requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Tentative
Tract Map No. 30494 have been made as follows:
1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is
consistent with the City General Plan and Canyon Hills Specific Plan; Title 16 of the
Municipal Code relating to Subdivisions; and the State Subdivision Map Act.
The project is consistent with the designated land use planning areas, development and
design standards, and all other appropriate requirements contained in the Canyon Hills
Specific Plan, General Plan, City Municipal Code, and Subdivision Map Act.
2. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and
programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5).
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
TENTATIVE TRACI' MAP NO. 30494
Page 2 of 2
The project is consistent with the land use plan, development and design standards and
programs, and all other appropriate requirements contained in the General Plan.
The effects this proposed subdivision is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region,
the public service requirements of its residents, and the available fiscal and environmental
resources have been considered and balanced.
The project is consistent with the City's General Plan and Canyon Hills Specific Plan, will
provide necessary public services and facilities, will pay all appropriate fees, and will not
result in any adverse environmental impact.
4. The design of the subdivision provides to the greatest extent possible, for future passive or
natura] heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision (Government Code Section
66412.3).
The project will comply with all appropriate conservation requirements of the City and
Uniform Building Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND t t the Ci ouncil of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve Tentative Tract Map No. 30494.
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on October 4, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANCIA,
LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-116
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE QTY COUNCIL ADOPTION
OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DEQ.ARATION 2005-07 FOR
THE PROJECT KNOWN AS TENTATIVE TRAG"I' MAl'
NO. 33370 (FOR CONDOMINIUM PURI'OSES);
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-02; AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-01 LOCATED
SOUTHEAST OF I-15 FREEWAY AND SOUTH OF
FRANKLIN STREET.
Wf IEREAS, an application has been filed with the Ciry of Lake Elsinore by Lumos
Communities, LLC to request approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-07 for the
purpose of developing a residential condominium community; and
WHEREAS, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-07 has been prepared to evaluate
environmental impacts resuking with the project; and
WHEREAS, the Pluuiuzg Coinmission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of maku~g recommendation to the City Council adopting Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 2005-07; and
Wf-IEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Pluu~uig Comnvssion
has considered and approved the request by staff on October 4, 2005; and
WI IEREAS, a Notice of Intent to Adopt (NOI) has been filed with the Office of Pluiiiuig
and Research and the County of Riverside Clerk of said applications, and the Platming Division has
requested a public review period of said document, coimnencing on September 9, 2005 and
extending to October 11, 2005 (SC~3 No. 2005091060); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Coirunission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE as follows:
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-07 has been prepared, submitted and reviewed in
accordance with requiremenu of the Galifomia Environmental Qualiry Act and the Cit}~s
CEQA requiremenu. The report is complete and adequate in it's evaluation of all
environmental effects of the project known as Tessera and associated discretionary
approvals and will not resuk in any significant environmental affects with mitigation
measures, based on the following findings;
WHEREAS, the Planning Conunission recommends to the Ciry Council that it finds that
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004-10 is complete and adequate and provides appropriate
environmental documentation for the project and fully complies with the requiremenu of CEQA,
and the City's environmental clearance procedures.
PLANNING COMIVIISSION RESOLUTION FOR
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2005-07
Page 2 of 2
FINDINGS-MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
1. Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before a
proposed mitigated negative declaration and initial study aze released for public review would
avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where cleariy no significant effecu would
occur; and
Tlae appli~arn lxrs mrde n~isio~a to tlae projat ar has agrc~l to sp~fu• mrxGt'w~a zelnd~ ~Id awid tlae
~S ar rr¢Cigxte tlae effazs ~the p~vjat to a pairn 2vheie ~to sigrnfi~ctru ~ats wxfld axztr.
2. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the agency, that the
project as revised may have significant effect on the environment.
Purs~arn to the euclenee raeizal in tJae li~it ~'the zel~e rsz~rzl pr~aua•l to staff the prrojat zeill n~ Jaaze a
sigrafu~arn effat ort th~e enci~rnvr,er2 cmaidering the appliral~e Cordixirna ~Apprvml a~xl Mixigztiort
Mo~nto~ing Report Program
NOW, TI-IEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Plannuig Coinnussion of_the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMIVIEND the Ciry Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore certifyMitigated Negative Declaration No. 20 5-0
Ron LaPere, Ckiaun~ui
Lake Eisinore Plaunuig Comnvssion
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plamiuig Coinmission at a meeting
thereof conducted on October 4, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Coimnissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANQA,
LARIMER
NOES: Comaussioneis:
ABSENT: Commissioneis:
ABSTAIN: Coirunissioners:
5-07 Lumos 2nd 145-OS.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-117
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
TENTATIVE TRACI' MAP NO. 33370 (FOR
CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES) FOR THE "TESSERA"
PROJECI' LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF I-]5 FREEWAY
AND SOUTH OF FRANKLIN STREET.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Lumos
Communities, LLC, to request the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 33370 (For Condominium
Purposes) for the establishment of a residential condominium community; and
WHEREAS, the Plaiuung Coiiuiussion of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of recommending approval of Tentative Tract Maps (For Condominium
Purposes) for residential projects; and
WI IEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plu~uuig Connivssion
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on October 4, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Plamung Conunission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of reconunending approval for Tentative Tract Maps;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planni a Coirunission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plaiuiuig Comnvssion has considered the proposed request for
Tentative Tract Map No. 33370 (For Condominium Purposed) and has found it acceptable. The
Plannuig Coimnission finds and detesrnines that this project is consistent with Section 16
"Subdivuions" of the Lake ELsinore Municipal Code (LEMG~, Section(s) 66424 and 66427 of the
California Subdivision Map Act (CSMA) and that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-07 is
adequate and prepared in accordance with the requiremenu of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), which analyzes environmental effects of the project, based upon the following
findings and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with the Section(s~ 66424 and 66427 of the Califomia
Subdivision Map Act (CSMA) and Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the I.ake Elsinore Municipal Code
(I.EMC), the following findings for the approval of the condominium map has been xnade as
follows:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAl' NO. 33370 (FOR CONDOMIIVIUM PURI'OSES)
Page 2 of 3
FINDINGS - TENTATIVE TRACT MAI' (FOR CONDOMIIVIUM PURPOSES~.
1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for iu design and improvement, is
consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives,
policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Govermnent Code
Section 66473.5).
7?ae proja~ as d~sigr,~l assists in ad~ieiing th~e ~~'a 7aell-bala~a' a~xl fi~a~ ~iorurl ~rsx ~'n3idemia~
mrrorercia~ imliatria~ ope~z spac~ ~emational a~xl iaatitzrtiorerl la~xl usg (GOAL 1.0, La~xl Use Elen~ru~ as
~ce~ll prozide claerrt hw~sing opporturriti~x an~' a satisfyir~g liung errrirnrnrern for rrsiderus ~'Lake Elsi~re
(GOAL 1.0, HaaingElenrnt)
2. The effects this projea is likelyto have upon the housing needs of the region, the public service
requiremenu of iu residenu and the available fiscal and enviroxunental resources have been
considered and balanced.
Crnccidering tlae eff~s this projax is likely to haze upo~z tlae ~ds gF'tJae r~giora a mrdztion ~'approzul ~cezzs
i~lerrcntal ~ehid~ z¢a¢rld ~uire tlae appluurn to eruer into an agr~rent ~eith tlae Rale~rn A~rxy ~tlae
CiZy ~Lake Elsir~ p~vziding I S% gf the zaaits in tl~e projax as afforzlablel~nusing uruzs in aarnzlarx~ ~ceith
the ra~uin»prrts ~ Sation 33413(b) ~ the ~lifo»va Car~rzmrty Raleca'o[nrent Law ar an alternacize
a~uiurlern ac~rnc zahid~ nuy irn'~de (eairha¢,r lirreraxiorr~ dEdicatwn ~'7tt~aan larec~ coresc,uction ~'uff'ordable urnts
on armth~er sit~ ar payrrprn ~'an in lieu f~ ralcz~latal to prozide suf~'icr'ent fzax/s to urxlerceaize t!~ long-term
affo~z/ability ~an e~uiv.dzr2 rurm~r gF ro~eza~opnPru projat areas.
3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant environmental impact.
The prnjaz lxrs l~z ada3uata'y mrd'zt'ior,e~l by all applicable depart~rerrts and a~ arad zeill rrot tl~~rnZ
~ult in a~ry sigrafuaru azrimrnrerrtal i~r~iads.
NOW, TF3EREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plann~ a Conunission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMIVIEND TO THE QTY COLTNQL APPROVAL of a
Tentative Tract Map No. 33370 (For Condominium ses).
Ron L ere, Cliui7nan
Lake Elsinore Planning Coimnission
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 33370 (FOR CONDOMINILTM PURI'OSES)
Page 3 of 3
I herebycertifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Planning Coimivssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on October 4, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Conmiissione~:
NOES: Couunissioners:
ABSENT: Conunissioners:
ABSTAIN: Coimivssioneis:
ATTEST:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANQA,
T.ARTMER
0 Condo Map 10.5-OS.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-118
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE QTY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-O1
FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDOMINIUM
PROJECT HIVOWN AS "TESSERA" LOCATED
SOUTHEAST OF I-15 FREEWAY AND SOUTH OF
FRANHI,IN STREET.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake ELsinore by Lumos
Communities, LLC to request the approval of a Conditional Use Permit 2005-01, for the
establishment of a condominium communiry known as"Tessera"; and
WHEREAS, the Plaiuiuig Conmvssion of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Permits for condominium projects; and
WI~REAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plam~uig Comnvssion
has considered and approved the request by staff on October 4, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plam~uig Comnvssion has considered the proposed request for
Conditional Use Pemut No. 2005-01 and has found it acceptable. The Plazuzuig Comnvssion finds
and deternunes that this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and determines
that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-07 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the
requiremenu of the California Environmental Qaaliry Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental
effects of the proposed project, based upon the followmg findings and deterinuiations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permirs)) of the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings for the project have been made as follows:
FINDINGS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
1. The proposed use, on iu own meriu and within the context of iu setting, is in accord with
the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site
is located.
In o~zler to adiieze a z¢ell &zlar.e~l aral~i.axtional yraz ~yesideruia~ mrr~erria~ i~lisstr'ra~ operi spac~
~atiar~d aral i~atituezonal larxl uses, staff7xrs zhrn~ghly eurl~atez'tlae land use mr~tibil~uls nars~ M'af~c
arxl otlaer erzuronrreiual la2zaxfs ra'araad to the pm[~asaz' Corel'uiorYrl Use PerrrRt for a Carelorr~rrimian
Co»v~aaTicy refererx~rl her~in Aarnzlir~gl~ the~»nn~aal lared ~se is in arrxuryer,ee zrith tf~ ahjaxizs ~tlae
Ge~ral Plan an~'the puipase ~tlae planni~distrid in zehid~ tlaesire u lorazs l
2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general
welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the
Ciry, or injurious to property or improvemenu in the neighborhood or the City.
PLANNING CONIMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-01
Page 2 of 3
In aamzl zvith the purpases ~' tlae C~iapter 17.74 (Cord'uzonal Use Pe»~axsJ gF tl.~ Lake Elsirrore
Murncipal Ca~ the C'uy realizal tlaat the propcsal mredorranizrrn use refererea~l laerein rnxy lxize a pcverrtrul
to ~iza'y i~rq'iact tlae zea'fare ~ persrna ~siding or zevr~iing zeithin th~e n~igh(~rfaarl ar th~e Cit}c
Crnzsidering this, staff lxrs substaruzatez' tlxu all applicable Cuy DePa~t~rents a~xl Ager,as haze lz~n
aff'or~l the opportxmity for a thorou~i re~iezv~ ~'tbe ztse arxl lauee irxrnporatal all applirab~e cmrmpms
ard/or mr,dztirna relatxl to i~zstcdlation and ~rttimename ~la~xLsraping str~et daliratiore;, ~ulatzara ~
poanu gF 2e'iicz~lar ingress a~xl Egmss aml mrara~ ~ po~eiuicd rttrisa~xes, so as to elirranase any r,e~ize
i~avs to thegen~ral health, safel~ am f'or5 ar~ral zeelfare ~'tlae sz~rr~rrading ~i~ila~rlxzd ar the Cit~s
3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for
all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required by
Title 17 of the I,EMC.
17ae ~rropasal mrxlarranium use referer~l herein laas lz~n desigrxel in consideratirnz ~'the size aaxl shape ~
~ ProP~1s t~~Y St~r~~gtlaen~in8 a~acl enhaming the inm~diate imfi~st~ial arec~ Further, tlae projat as
PmP~e~ ~~~~~ ~~u1' ~ existing derelop~re~n arel -caill cmate a u'sually pleasir~; nwz-
detractize r~'atirnahip l~ze~z tJae prapase~arad eristingprajats, in tl.utt the storage ama has E~z reaereaz'to
eresure ada~uate prnrision ~scre~ri~frromthe pubdic ri~ns-c~'zetty oradjacern pmpe,ties,
4. The site for the proposed use relates to streeu and highways with proper design both as to
width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantiry of traffic generated by the subject
use.
77ae propasa~ mra~lorrsnirrm use ~'ererzeel l~rin has 1~ reiiera~l as to its Yelation to the ~aidth aral tyPe ~
pazerrent n~e/a~ to rarry tlae ty[~e drtd 4r~arnzt'Y ~'cr"df~C 8e~at~ tn tlxtt the Ctty l.as ade~ately eurlruttEd
tlae parernicrl i~rg'iacts associatxl7aitb tlae pivpasa~ a~tdarr starage p~ior to iis apprrnul a~' lxts mrxlitior,e~l
tlae prnjaz to F,e serzttl by ~rds ~'ada~yate rapadtyarad daign starxJanls to prozide masorrable aczss by rar,
Crudz, transi~ ard bic}de
5. In approving the subject use located at Assessor Parcel Number 373-071-013 there will be
no adverse affect on abutting propeny or the pemutted and nom~al use thereof.
71ae pro~xxea' use has l~ri thoras~ily reriezettl aaad m~aditior,~a' by all appliatble CiZy Depa~trrents ayrl
a¢usideAgerxia, eliyr¢nating the pareruial far arry and all adzerse eff'axs on tlae abi.rttinBProPeYt1•
6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17J4.50 of the LEMC have been
incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Pemut to insure that the use
continues in a muuier envisioned by these findings for the term of the use.
Puissuarn to Sa~ion 17.74.050 (Adirne ~tlae Planning Conmassiorr~ ~tlae Lake Elsinrne M~miapal Ca~e
(LEMC), tlae Coredorr~nU.rm C.o~rmuraty k~cvz as "Tssera" Ixu lx~e sdaaa'z~lal for cmaideration a~xl
aPPrauzl ~theP(anrri~ Corrnrsssion
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-O1
Page 3 of 3
NOW, TT~REFORE, based on the above Findings, the Piazuung Cominission of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Conditisnal Use Pernut No. 2005-O1.
Lake Elsinore Plamvng Conunission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planni a Conunission at a meeting
thereof conduaed on October 4, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: ComiivssioneTS: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANQA,
LARIMER
NOES: Comcnissioners:
ABSENT: Cominissioners:
ABSTAIN: Cot7unissioners:
U:Vmiller\ALS. FTLES\Resoluuons-Orciinances\2005\PC RESO CUP 2005-O1 Lumos 10-405.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-119
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-02 FOR THE
DESIGN, CONSTRUG"I'ION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF
THE CONDOMINIUM PROJECT KNOWN AS "TESSERA"
LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF I-15 FREEWAY AND SOUTH
OF FRANKLIN STREET.
WIIEREAS, an application has been filed with the Czty of I.ake Elsinore by Lumos
Communities, LLC to request the approval of Residential Design Review No. 2005-02 for the
design, construction and establishment of a residential condominiuxn community; and
WHEREAS, the Plazu~uig Conunission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of recommending approval of Design Reviews for residential projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plamung Conunission
has considered and approved the request by staff on October 4, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planuuig Conm~ission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECI'ION 1. The Plaiuung Coiiunission has considered the proposed request for
Residential Design Review No. 2005-02 and has found it acceptable. The Planniiig Conmvssion
finds and detetrnines that this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and
determines that Mitigated Negative Deciaration No. 2005-07 is adequate and prepared in accordance
with the requiremenu of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes
environmental effecrs of the proposed project, based upon the following findings and
deternunations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the project have been made as follows:
FINDINGS - DESIGN REVIEW
1. The project, as approved, will complywith the goals and objectives of the General Plan and
the Zoning District in which the project is located.
71aee propasaz' Rs'identtal Design Reuetr~ crnnair,~l herein am~7li~ zeith the ~rls and d~j~tiu~ of th~e
Ger.reral Pla~y in that the ccp[m~uzl ~this Cor~a'arranium Convrrmriy eaill asszst in adnezing th~e derrloprreat
~'a ze~l-&zlarxttl aml fisr,~ional rrc~ ~'nnidern~a~ anmrenia~ ir~lustricr~ opaz spac~ r~reacirnwl and
i7atitutional layxl usg as zedl as erxvuragi~ irecliGSt~ial la~' uses to dizersify Lake Elsinnre's ~orzorrsc• bzse
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-02
Page 2 of 3
77ae p~vpasal Residemiul Design Rerierv cornair,~a' h~erein zs appropriate to the site a~xl surrourxlir~g
d~ras in that tlae Cor,~rarriumprojat laas F~z daigr,~z' in caaiderution ~tJae size ared sJxspe ~th~e
property, th~ereby cra.~ting imerest aml uzrying ~cistas as a person ~rnza along tlae str~ Furth~-tlae przzryar as
j~mp~al7vll crnr~len~ru the qual ~uY ~~~~8 ~P~ a~ zeill cmute a zisyally pleasin~ n~ortd~ract~ce
r~'atiorahip l~traa~ the propasaz' a~xl exzsting projms in tlxit tlae ardnt«tural dsigr~ mlo~- arxl rmterials
ami site daignpropasa~ezrderxe a mrxenz frn"R~uY~ ~8~~
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to
result in anysignificant adverse environmental impacts.
Altl~as~i tlae propase~ projax ax~ld lazze a sign~ifuarn effax on tlae er~cirornrerr5 ~iu~se rerisions in the
prvja2 lxaze l~c m~de by or agrarl to by tlae proja2 propor~m arry signifuarn Qdze~se effs~s zaw~ld nn¢ l~
arniapatal Furthe, pursuam to the Califorrria E~zciromrental ~al'uy Act (CEQA), t!~ Mizi~l
N~Zti-ce Dalaratiarc Mirig ~t'wn Monitrning Report P~ngram for tlae pmpnsa( Residencial Design Reuerv
refererx~rl herein faand that tlaep~roposalpraja2 zvi/l n~ laaze a sigrrafuam effat on tlae e~~iromrerrt pznsr~aarn
to the attadaal Cor,efitirna ~Appravzl an~'rratigatiom propasal
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guaz.uitees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with
the objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Puisuam w Sation 17.82.070 (Actirnz ~thePlanning Co~mrsssior~ ~'tJaeLakeElsinrneMurricipal Ccde
(LEMC), the jm~pnsal Residential Design Retiermrefererx~l herein lxrs (~z sd~dylez' far crnaideratzort a~xl
aPProu:l g~th~e Planrur~g Co»massion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plamvng Conuivssion of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMNIEND TO THE QTY COLJNQL APPROVAL of a
Residential Design Review No. 2005-02.
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Conunission
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-02
Page 3 of 3
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plamzuig Comnvssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on October 4, 2005 by the following vote:
AI'ES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANQA,
T.ARTMER
NOES: Conuivssioners:
ABSEN'I': Coiniivssionexs:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
Conui~ission
U:\Imiller\ALL FTLES\Resoluc~ns-Ordinances\2005\PC RESO Design ReviewR2005-02 Lumos 10.0405.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-120
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE QTY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-10
FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND
ESTABLISHMENT OF TWO (2) NEW RESIDENTIAL
DUPLEX DEVELOPMENTS AND ASSOCIATED
IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED WITHIN THE HISTORIC
DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN DISTRICT.
WI~REAS, an application has been filed with the Ciry of Lake Elsinore by Shawn
McElvogue M4 Development, LLC to request the approval of Residential Design Review No. 2005-
10 for the design, consmiction and establishment of two (2) residential duplex developmenu; and
WI IEREAS, the Pluinuig Comnvssion of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of recoimnending approval of Design Reviews for residential projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plaiuung Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on October 4, 2005.
NOW TI~REFORE, the Planning Couunission of the City of I,ake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECI'ION 1. The Pluinuig Conm~ission has considered the proposed request for
Residential Design Review No. 2005-10 and has found it acceptable. The Planning Conuivssion
finds and deterxnines that this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMG~
and that no further environmental review is necessary pursuant to the California Environmental
QualityAct (CEQA), Seaion 15332.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the project have been made as follows:
FINDINGS - DESIGN REVIE W
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and
the Zoning District in which the project is located.
Tbe prvpasal Residemial Design ReciEw crnrq~lies zeitl~ tlae ~cals arx~ abjaxi~es ~tJae Ger,~ral Plar~ iyz tlaat
1~72 d~YDilil (~llJ7S ~~ ~&Z 4QZll Q5575C ZYL QdJle(LY~ I~7E C~CLflO~7I7PlTl (~d 'LP~-~77C~ dY81~~ZOYIQI
~rca, g~residernia~ m~rnrrizza~ i~tria~ opere spac~ ra~rrational and insc'u~tional layel us~ as -cadl as
erxacsraging i~xli~strial laml usg to dizersify Lake Elsirrore's avr~a»ac• base
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
77ae prvpasal Reidemial Dsigri Recierm zs appropriate to tJae site arxl sur~i~ derelo[nrerus in tlaat tlae
Duplez projatTxrs l~z desigr,~l in a»aideration ~tlae sizea~xl slaape ~th~eP~P~1s t~Y ~~8
c~rY couivaL ~sor.v~r~oN
RESIDENTTAL DESIGN NO. 2005-10
Page 2 of 2
imerest arxl uzrying vstas as a p~erson ~ along the strtrt Further tlae projax as propas~l z¢ill o~lerrent
tlae qr~aluy gFexisting dereloprrern a~xl zeill cmate a zis~ally plecrsin~ rernac(~radize relaCionship l~zea~z tlae
propase~ a~xl eeistirig proja~ts in Jxu tlae ard~ural desigry cdai- a~' nttterials a~'sire design prvpasal
eriderse a crnx~rn frn'qualuY a~xl ori8znalrt~
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to
result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Purs~aru to the Califrnrna E~zcimrm~7tal Qual'uy Ad (CEQA), tl~ prro~nsal R~ideaCial Design Reiierv
as n~rieu~l aml cmxlitirn,~l by all applicable Cuy Dieisirna aaxl Departrn~rts a~'A~ixzes, zeill rro¢ haze a
sig~a'ifuam eff'ax on tlae er~irorvrern purs~arn to attada~el C.'ord'uions ~AppmuzL
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incoxporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with
the objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuarn to Satio~z 17.82.070 (Action ~'tlaePlan~n~ Corr~rassion) ~tJae LakeElsinrneMzrra¢pal Cale
(LEMCJ, the propasal Raidertcial D~,cign ReLieca~ laas lx~rt sdaalr~lct~l for cmaideration arxl appivrul of the
Pla~ung Corr~rn,ssion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above F' dings, the Pluzniiig Cominission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Resi en ' Desieai.Review No. R 2005-10.
Lake Elsinore Plu~ning Commission
I herebycertifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Plaiuiuig Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on October 4, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Conmvssioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANQA,
LARIMER
NOES: Comnvssioners:
ABSENT': Conunissionexs:
ABSTAIN: Coimnissioners:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-121
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CONIMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 16778 LASH STREET.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Ciry of Lake Elsinore by Mr. Gary Goh,
requesting Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence; and
WI-IEREAS, the Planniug Comnvssion of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approvmg a Minor Design Review for Single Family Residences; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plannuig Conuivssion
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on October 18, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Plamiuig Cominissiou of the City of Lake Elsinare DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SEG"TION 1. The P~annina Comnvssion has considered the proposed request for a Minor
Design Review for a Single Family Residence and has found it acceptable. The Plam~uig
Conu7vssion finds and deterxnines that this project is consistent with Chapter 17.23 (R 1 Single
Family Residential District) of the Iake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMG~ and that this aaion is
exempt from the requiremenu of the Califomia Environmental Q.iality Act (CEQA) piusuant to
Section 15303;
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the I,ake Elsinore
Municipal Code the followuig findings for the have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will complywith the goaLs and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The propasal Mi~- Design Reue~ loratal at 16778 Lash Str~t crnr~ilia zeith the gmis aml objatizg ~tlae
Ger~ral Plary in that tlae approurl ~'tlns si~farraly ~rsiderze ~ceill assist in a~hierzng the derelopm~u ~'a zedl-
bala~l aml fi~zzonal rrax ~resid~rcra~ cv»vrerciu~ iredr~str'ur~ opaz spac~ Ya~rational a~ad institutional laml
uses as ~rzdl as er,muraging tlae decelopm~u and miirnenanre ~a braxcl rar~e ~hw~s~ng tYP'g }~or all imrnre
groups a~xl a~e ~.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-721
PAGE NO. 2
The propassl Min~or D~ign Rederm la~atal at 16778 Lash Stra~ zs appropriate to the site arxl su~ra.axli~
d~a'op»~ns in tl~zt tJae single farr¢ly hare Ixu l~z desigr,e~l im m~sideration ~ tlae size arxl slxipe ~ tlae
Propert~ tb~ereby cr~uin$ irnergt craad Zuur~~ zistas as a person ~ along th~e str~ Furtlaer tlae projaz as
pm[xisal zezll crm~lerrent tlae qztal'uy ~eeisting der~qreru arxl zeill create a vsually pleasin~ r,rnrd~-actize
yelaCionship ~z tlae propnsa~ a~xl eezsting projs~s in tlazt tlae a~2ral desigr~ az~rn- a~xl mzterials
propas~el eeca~ls rlae size aml design ~tlae hrnra in the surraaadinga~ra.
3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guai~itees and evidence of
compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to
insure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and the
plazmuig distna in which the site u located.
Pursuant to Section 17.82.100 (Minor Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
(LEMG~, the proposed Minor Design Review located at 16778 L.ash Street has been scheduled
and considered for approval bythe Plauiiing Commission.
NOW, '1T-IEREFORE, based on the above
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE of
Residence located at 16778 Lash Street. ~
the Plannina Comiiussion of the City
~esign Re~ for a Single-Family
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plamiuig Comnvssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on October 18, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Coinmissioners:
NOES: Coimnissioneis:
ABSENT: Cominissioners:
ABSTAIN: Coimivssionexs
LAPERE, O'NEAL, FRANQA, LARIMER
GONZALES
ATI'EST: C%~
Rolfe Preisendanz, Director of CommuniryDevelopment
Lake Elsinore Plannina Conunission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-122
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH
SECTIONS 6.1.2 AND 6.1.4 OF THE MULTIPLE
SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP)
FOR THE PROJECT IDENTIFIED AS TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 31593
WHEREAS, consistency with the MSHCP is required and a site specific focused survey
for consistency with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines is required by Section
6.1.2 of the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSCHP) and Guidelines Pertaining to
Urban/Wildland Interface by Section 6.1.4 of the MSCHP for the purpose of a Tentative Tract
Map; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore evaluated the consistency of the project with the
(MSHCP); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendation to the City Council adopting the Findings of
Consistency with the MSHCP; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered and approved the request by staff on October 18, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE as follows:
A Habitat Assessment prepazed by Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. has been
prepared, submitted and reviewed in accordance with requirements of the Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The report is complete and adequate in iYs
evaluation of all environmental effects of the project identified as Tentative Tract Map
No. 31593 and will not preclude the implementation of the MSHCP goals, based on the
following finding;
FINDINGS-MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN
1. The proposed project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution that must make an
MSHCP Consistency finding before approval.
Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Resolution, because the proposed project requires a number
of discretionary approvals from the City and is subject to CEQA review, it must be reviewed
for MSHCP consistency, which entails for the proposed project determining whether it is
subject to the City's LEAP process, consistent with the Protection of Species Associated with
Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines (MSHCP, ,¢ 6.1.2), Guidelines
Pertaining to Urban/Wildland Interface (MSHCP, ~ 6.1.4), Additional Survey Needs and
PLANNING CAMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
TENTATIVE TRAG"I' MAP NO. 31593
Page 2 of 4
Procedures (MSHCP, § 6.3.2), Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines (MSHCP, § 6.3.2),
Vegetation Mapping (MSHCP, ~ 6.3.1) requirements, Fuels Management Guidelines
(MSHCP, ~' 6.4), and payment of the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee (MSHCP
Ordinance, ~ 4).
2. The proposed project is subject to the Joint Project Review process.
According to the Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), the footprint of the
project site is located within the Elsinore Area Plan. This Area Plan, the County's RCIP
Website (see httv.•//www.rcip.or /~ma~), and the (MSHCP) Conservation Summary
Report Generator Sheet for the area show that the proposed project is localed within Subunit
5, Proposed Core 1 and comprises a portion of Cell Groups A', B' and Z' of the Elsinore
Area Plan and is subject to the City's LEAP process. The proposed project is located within
Cells 4276 and 4367 of the MSHCP. Conservation within the Cell Groups will focus on
chaparral, coastal sage scrub, riparian scrub and woodland and forest habitat. As a result,
the proposed project has been subject to the Joint Project Review process.
3. The proposed project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools
Guidelines.
No riparian, riverine, vernal pool/fairy shrimp habitat and other aquatic resources were
identified on the proposed project site. The Riverside fairy shrimp is not expected to occur
on the proposed Project site due to lack of suitable habitat. As a result, no further MSHCP
analysis or conservation measures are required. The proposed project is therefore
consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools Guidelines.
4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Nanow Endemic Plant Species
Guidelines.
The project site does fall within the Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Areas. Therefore,
a habitat assessment was required for Narrow Endemic Plant Species. The assessment was
prepared by Michael Couffer, a consulting ecologist, in October 2003 for Bon Terra
Consulting. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the Protection
of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines.
5. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures.
The project site falls within the Burrowing Owl Survey Area. A burrowing owl survey was
conducted by Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. in late January 2004, for the winter
portion, and late April early May 2004 for the nesting portion of the survey. No burrowing
owls were detected during either survey. This survey was conducted in accordance with the
California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG 1995) field protocol. Prior to issuance of
a grading permit, the applicant shall conduct a burrowing owl presence/absence survey. If
no burrowing owls are found and other biological mitigation measures have been satisfied,
the proposed Project may proceed. However, if the species is found onsite, the applicant
shall develop and implement a burrowing owl mitigation plan for protection of the species in
PLANNING COMMiSSION RESOLUTION FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31593
Page 3 of 4
compliance with CDFG Protocol. The project is therefore consistent with the Additional
Survey Needs Requirements.
6. The proposed project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines.
Measures have been incorporated into the proposed project so that there will be no project-
related drainage, toxics, lighting, noise, invasives, barriers, and grading/land development
impacts to the Conservation Area. The proposed project is therefore consistent with the
Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines.
7. The proposed project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
The vegetation of the entire project site has been mapped. This mapping is sufficient under
the MSHCP and is consistent with the MSHCP.
8. The proposed project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines.
The proposed project will be designed to include landscape buffers near the proposed
MSHCP Conservation Area that will in essence act as Fuel Modification Zones. Within
these areas there will be fre-resistant, non-invasive plants. Accordingly, with these
measures, the proposed project is therefore consistent with the Fuels Management
Guidelines.
9. The proposed project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development
Mitigation Fee.
As a condition of approval, the project will be reguired to pay the City's MSHCP Local
Development Mitigation Fee at the time of issuance of building permits.
10. The proposed project overall is consistent with the MSHCP.
The proposed project complies and is consistent with all of the reguired procedures, policies,
and guidelines of the City's MSHCP Resolution and the MSHCP. The applicant has made
revisions to the project or has agreed to specific conditions, which would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects of the project to a point where no significant effects would occur.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMME that the Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore adopt the Findings of Consistency Sec i ns 6. .2 .1. .
Ron aPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
PLANNING CONIMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31593
Page 4 of 4
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on October 18, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANQA,
LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
/
Rolfe Preisendanz, Secretary to the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-123
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2005-08
WHEREAS, Southshore Properties, LLC, has submitted an application for Tentative
Tract Map No. 31593. The approximate 234.0 acre site is located easterly of Interstate 15 and
Camino Del Norte and northerly of the extension of a proposed roadway link from Camino Del
Norte to the Ramsgate Specific Plan area, immediately south of the Wasson Creek; and
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 31593 is defined as a"projecY' by Section 21065
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Cal. Public Resources Code
Section 21000 et seq., which is defined as an activity which may cause either a direct physical
change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the
environment and which includes the issuance to a person of a lease, permit, license, certificate,
or other enritlement for use by one or more public agencies; and
WHEREAS, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-08 has been prepared to evaluate
environmental impacts resulting with the project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for approving Mitigated
Negative Declaration No. 2005-08; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said applications has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Deparhnent
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on October 18,
2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration No. 2005-08, prior to making a decision to recommend approval to the
City Council. The Planning Commission finds and determines that Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 2005-08 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effects of the
project, based upon the following findings and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No.
2005-08 have been made as follows:
1. Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before a
proposed mitigated negative declaration and initial study are released for public review
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2005-08
Page 2 of 3
would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects
would occur; and
The applicant has made revisions to the project and has agreed to specific conditions which
will avoid the effects and will mitigate the effects of the project to a point where no
significant effects would occur.
2. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the agency, that the
project as revised may have significant effect on the environment.
Pursuant to the evidence received in the light of the whole record presented to staff the
project will not have a significant effect on the environment based on the current project
design, the applicable Conditions of Approval, incorporation of the Mitigation Measures and
implementation of the Mitigation Monitoring Program.
3. Mitigation measures have been required to ensure all potentially significant impacts are
reduced to levels of insignificance.
Mitigation measures have been required which will reduce significant environmental impacts
to the level of insignificance. These are reflected in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
will be implemented through the Mitigation Monitoring Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve Mitigated Negative Declaration N. 2 5-08.
Ron aPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on October 18, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANCIA,
LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
PLANNING CAMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECI,ARATION NO. 2005-08
Page 3 of 3
ATTEST:
L_
Rolfe Presendanz, Secretary to the
Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-124
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 31593 WHICH SUBDIVIDES 234.0
ACRES OF LAND INTO 521 RESIDENTIAL LOTS
WHEREAS, Southshore Properties. LLC, has submitted an application for Tentative
Tract Map No. 31593 which subdivides 234.0 acres of land into 521 residential lots. Tentative
Tract Map No. 31593 is generally located easterly of Interstate 15 and Camino Del Norte and
northerly of the extension of a proposed roadway link from Camino Del Norte to the Ramsgate
Specific Plan area, immediately south of the Wasson Creek; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the
subdivision of land; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on October 18,
2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed subdivision,
Tentative Tract Map No. 31593, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council
approve the proposed subdivision. The Planning Commission finds and determines that
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-08 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes
environmental effects of the Tentative Tract Map No. 31593, based upon the following findings
and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State California Subdivision Map Act and
requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Tentative
Tract Map No. 31593 have been made as follows:
1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for the design and improvement, are
consistent with the General Plan; Zoning Code; Title 16 of the Municipal Code relating to
Subdivisions; and the State Subdivision Map Act.
The project has been reviewed by the City and the appropriate affected Agencies and been
determined to be consistent with the designated land use planning area, development and
design standards, and all other appropriate reguirements contained in the General Plan,
Zoning Code, Ciry Municipal Code, and Subdivision Map Act.
PLANNING CAMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
TENTATIVE TRAG"1' MAl' NO. 31593
Page 2 of 3
2. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and
programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5).
The project has been reviewed by the City and the appropriate affected Agencies and been
determined to be consistent with the designated land use planning area, development and
design standards, and all other appropriate requirements contained in the General Plan,
Zoning Code, City Municipal Code, and Subdivision Map Act.
3. The effects this proposed subdivision is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region,
the public service requirements of its residents, and the available fiscal and environmental
resources have been considered and balanced.
The project is consistent with the City's General Plan and Zoning Code, and will provide
housing opportunities consistent with the General Plan land use designation. In addition,
the project has been conditioned to provide necessary public services and facilities, will pay
all appropriate fees, and will not result in any adverse environmental impact.
4. The design of the subdivision provides to the greatest extent possible, for future passive or
natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision (Government Code Section
664123).
The project will comply with all appropriate conservation reguirements of the City and
Uniform Building Code and will not preclude future opportunities for passive natural heating
or cooling opportunities.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve Tentative Tract Map No. 31593.
Ro L ere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on October 18, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANCIA,
LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31593
Page 3 of 3
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
~;iZ~ f/~--
Rolfe Preisendanz, Secretary to the
Planning Commission
RE SOLUTION NO. 2005-125
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-01 FOR THE
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A
TWO (2) DLJI'LEXES LOCATED AT 110 AND 118
CHESTNUT STREET
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Ciry of Lake Elsinore by Daniel Lopez to
request the approval of Residential Design Review No. 2005-01 for the design, constnxction and
establishment of a duplex; and
WI~REAS, the Plaruiing Conunission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of recommending approval of Design Reviews for residenual projecu; and
WI IEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planni a Comnvssion
has considered and approved the request bystaff on October 18, 2005.
NOW 'THEREFORE, the Planning Comnussion of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plauiiuig Conunission has considered the proposed request for
Residential Design Review No. 2005-O1 and has found it acceptable. The Plamung Comnvssion
finds and determines that this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and
deternunes that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CE'.QA)
puzsuant to Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projecu, and based upon the following findings and
determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the project have been made as follows:
FINDINGS - DESIGN REVIEW
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
7be propasa~ Resufernzal Design Reaew matain~l hzrein cmrq~lis zaith the ~eaals a~xl abj~tius ~th~e Geiaeral
Pla~y in that tlae approrul of tl~e dupleeg zeill assist in ad~ieting the derrlop»prn yf a zrell-Frilar,e~l and
fznxtional ~ af recidernia~ mrrorercia~ irn/i~stria~ open spac~ ramataonal ayel institutional /a~xl use as
zeell as enmi-tragi~ i~xlz~strial lurnl uses to dizeisify Lake Elsirrore's aorromic &ase
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
Tlae prnposaZ Residernial Dgign Rerakw a7rnain~ l herein zs app~v[mate to tl.~ site ami surrourding derdc~reius
in that the duplex projat has Ix~n desigreal in cmzsideration af tJae size arxl sl.e~pe ~tJae prop~ertys tlae~iy cmating
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-O1
Page 2 of 2
irnemst aml ztt~yi~ zistas as a penom m~s alor~ the str~ Further- tlae projaz as p~z>pasa~ ~eill cn~tte a vsually
pleusi~Yron-detractize n~ationship l~t~z the proposa~ arxl eezstir~g projaxs in tJae ardritarural desigrg cr~or ayd
nttterials arul site dgign propas~l ezideneea mncern farqual ~uy a~xl ori8~rralu~
3. Conditions and safeguards puisuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuarn to Sation 17.82.070 (Aaion of the Plamri~ Corrarassion) ~tlae Lcrke Elsinore Muraapal Cale
(LEMC), tl~ propasal Rgidential Design Reuez~ referene~l h~erein has l~rz sd~eJulErl far mresideratza~t and
aPProwl c~the Planrring C',orrnrassion
NOW, TT-IEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plam~uig Comcnission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECONIlVIEND T~ TT-IE QT'Y COiJNQL APPROVAL of a
Residential Design Review No. 2005-O1. ~~ ~\
Ron LaPere, CF"ia~rman
Lake ELsinore Plamiuig Coimnission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plannuig Conuivssion at a meeting
thereof conducted on October 18, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANQA,
LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSEIV'I': Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
A~`~~~~
R lfe Preisendanz, Seaetaryto the Plamiuig Conuivssion
U:Vnvller\ALS. FILES\Resolutions-Ordinances\2005\PC RESO Resi Design Review 2005-O1 Lopez 10.18-OS .doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-]26
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. 34023.
WIIEREAS, an application has been filed with the Cdty of Lake Elsinore by Saivador
Mendoza, to subdivide certain propeny into 2 parcels for future residential iou; and
WHEREAS, the Plannina Conuivssion of the City of I.ake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of makuig recommendations to the Ciry Council pertaining subdivision of land;
and
WE-IEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planni ~ Coiruiussion
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on October 18, 2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Plannuig Corcuivssion of the Cdty of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plaiuiing Conunission has considered the proposed subdivision (TPM
No. 34023), prior to mal~ig a decision to recoimnend that the Ciry Council approve the proposed
subdivision into 2 residential lou. The Planning Comuvssion finds and determines that this project
is exempt puxsuant to CEQA, which exempu infill project which area 5 acres or less.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State of California Subdivision Map Act, and the
Ciry of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 34023
have been made as follows:
1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for the design and improvement, are
consistent with the General Plan; Zoning Code; Tide 16 of the Municipal Code relating to
Subdivisions; and the State Subdivision Map Act.
17ae prvjaz zs crnesisteru zaith the daignatal la~acl use planning ama, decrlopm~ru arxl d~.sign sta7xlanls, ayel all
ovlaer appropriate ~ mrnai~l in the Ger~-al Plary Zoning Cal~ City Murri¢pal Ca(~ ayxl
Sulz~i-cisionMapAcx
2. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and
progruns specified in the General Plan (Govemment Code Section 66473.5~.
77ae prajat zs cvresist~n zeith the laYxt sae pla~y deca'oprrent arxl deign starxlards a~xl prngrarra, ared all arl~-
aPProPnatQ ~irerrerns mmai~l in the Ger~ral Plan
RESOLiJTION NO. 2005-126
PAGE TWO
3. The effecu this proposed subdivision is likelyto have upon the housing needs of the region, the
public service requirements of its residenu, and the available fiscal and envirorunental resources
have been considered and balanced.
7he projat is anaistau ~aitl~ the Cit~s Ger,~ral Plan a~xl Zwrir~g Cal~ zaill p~vrzde n~sary pul~ic sercices a~xl
faalitzes, ~vill payall appr~riate f~s, ayel ~aill rz~ ~sult inarryad7erse errcirorm~rual iarq~acG
4. The design of the subdivisions provides to the greatest extent possible, for fut~u-e passive or
natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision (Govermnent Code Section 66412.3).
71ae projat -ceill mrrq~ly ~eith all appro[»iate mr~serrucion ra3uiYerrents ~'th~e Cityarxl UnifornzBuild'ra~g Ca/e
NOW, 'THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Conunission of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECONIMEND that the Ciry Council of the Cary of Lake
Elsinore approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 34023.
Ron LaPere, Chau7nan
Lake Elsinore Plauuing Conuivssion
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Plaiuung Conunission at a meeting
thereof conducted on October 18, 2005 bythe following vote:
AYES: Cominissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANQA,
LARIMER
NOES: Conunissionexs:
ABSEN'I': Coinmissioners:
ABSTAIN: Coirunissionexs:
ATTEST:
Rolfe Preisendanz,
Secretaryto the Planning Conunission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 127
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-
17 WHICH ENTAILS DESIGN REVIEW OF A THREE-
PLAN MODEL HOME COMPLEX AND PRODUCTION
LTNITS WHICH WILL BE CONSTRUCTED
THROUGHOUT 127 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
LOTS WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 28214-3
Wf IEREAS, an application has been filed with the Ciry of Lake Elsinore by Casde & Cooke
requesting Design Review approval of a three-plan Model Home Complex and ultimate
development of production uniu throughout 1271ots within Tract Map No. 28214-3. The proposed
residential lots comprise approximately 31.1 acres and are located at the northeast corner of Lake
Sueet and Alberhill Ranch Road, within the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan area; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Conuivssion of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of approving Design Review requesu for residential projects with the Alberhill
Ranch Specific Plan; and
WI~',REAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Conmvssion
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public meeting held with respect to this item on October 18, 2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Comcnission of the City of Iake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECI'ION 1. The Pluming Coiiunission has considered the proposed design for the three-
plan Model Home Complex and production uniu and has found them acceptable. The Pluming
Cominission finds and deternunes this project is consistent with the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan
and the 2003 Addendum to the 1989 Final Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Impact
Report. Under Section 15162 of the California Environmental QaalityAct (CEQA) Guidelines, this
project has been declared exempt from further environmental clearance.
SECI'ION 2. That in accordance with Section 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of Residential Design Review No. 2005-17
have been made as follows:
1. Subject to the attached conditions the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any
significant adverse environmental impacu.
Staff l.~as deterrran~l tlxn this projat zs caaistern zvxh the All~rhill Ramh Spxi~u• Plan arad Veting Tract
Map Na 28214. Eszzirrnvremal dearaneea~aclanal~sis fartl,~pro[x~salappliratiazcrre prozidalbyAdderdum
Na 2 to the AU~rhill Rarz~i Spazfic Plan Final EIR, zel~id~ zebs pizpa~l far Vesting Tract Map Na
28214. Said erai~vnrrernal dcrurrem 2urs pn~ar~l in aanrzlame zeith Sation 15164 ~the CE QA Guidelir,~s
ayxl zv~rs app~vz~l by the C'uy Cameil in 2004. 7~ie propasal pmjat is m~sistern zeith th~e All~rhill Rar~i
Sp~c Plan arxl V7TM Na 28214 araa'therefor~ dces rrot mr~fl'ux zeith the firzling arad dis¢ssions mmai~l
intdaeAdderelumNa 2daun~iu 77~AdderdurraNa 2EIRa~ra'udaltl.iatsigrrifuarne~zcirrnmerual
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-127
PAGE 2
irrroads ~eill n~ r~sult ~aith iyrq~l~rtaC'wn ~tlxase natigztion rreaszrres mruai~l in tl.~ origincd 1989 Final
All~rhill Rard~ Sp~ fu Plan EIR and the 2003 Adder.elimz Na 2 EIR Further azuromrental dezrame is
nx ~xrsarJ~
2. The project complies with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the General Plan and the
Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan, as approved.
As dis¢assa~ tlae Ger,~-al Plan decignata tlae proja~ site as "AlJ~rhill Ra~ro'i Sp~rifu~ Plan': 71~e AU~hill
Rared~ Sj~rific Plan desigrrates tlae projex site as "Sing~Fa~raly Raidernial': Veting Tract Map Na 28214,
tlae projiasal mdd hrnre mrrq~lex, aYxl praa'udzon u~nts are conczstzm zeith tlae Sing~Fanaly Reiderrtial"
d~ignat~ion aml applirabJz dezeloprrer¢ arzl d~signsta~xlayds.
3. This project complies with the design directives contained in Chapter 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
71ae proposal projar is appropriate to tl~ site arxl sur~'ing derelopn~rus in tlaat tlae projar -ceill m~at~zut
si~e furraly detad~el urrits in aarralame zeixh appropriate deca'~nt ared dgign staredards a~uain~l in the
Al(~rhill Rand~ Sp~cPlan Tlae projs2 c~rates irrterest aml zttrying u'stas as a p~erson rrbzg alonga~zy projat
st~ 7?ae projat also cwr~lem~rts tlae qyaluY ~~ ~~8 ~Shlronn8 d~»~n and zeill crnuirwe to prrnide
vsr~ally~plPUSingdesignarad ardnt~ta.are ~eithin tlae projax am~
4. Conditions and safeguards pwsuant to Chapter 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of
compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the project to ensure
development of the propexty in accordance with the General Plan, Municipal Code, and
Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan, as approved.
TGae Planrring Corrarassion lxrs crosic%i~l th~e proja2 and finds that zeith mnd'uions ~approw~ th~e projat
c~lies uith th~e pu~pases aml ahjazius ~theRaidential DgignReuEwpraess.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Pluzuiiig Conunission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Reside ia YZroiect No. 2005-17.
Ron LaPere, Chairinan
Lake Elsinore Pluiuing Conunission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planiiing Conuivssion at a meeting
thereof conduaed on October 18, 2005 by the following vote:
AI'ES: Conunissioneis: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANQA,
T.ARTMER
NOES: Conunissioners:
ABSEN'I': Conunissioners:
ABSTAIN: Coinmissioners:
ATTEST:
/r!/?Z !~!/ \
Rolfe Preisendanz, Secretaryto the
Plamiuig Conunission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-128
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-17
FOR A PET CREMATORIUM TO BE LOCATED AT 29360
HiJNCO WAY, SUITE "A".
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Louis Reyes
to request the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-17 for the establishment of a pet
crematorium lmown as "Peaceful Paws"; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Permits; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Deparhnent
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on October 18,
2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for
Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-17 and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission
finds and determines that this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and
that no further environmental review is necessary pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15301, (Existing Facilities) and Section 15308, (Actions by
Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment);
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the
Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) findings for the project have been made as follows:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS
1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord with
the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the
site is located.
In order to achieve a well balanced and functional mir of residential, commercial,
industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses, staff has thoroughly
evaluated the land use compatibility, noise, traffic and other environmental hazards
related to the proposed Conditional Use Permit for a pet crematorium located at 29360
Hunco Way. Accordingly, the proposed land use is in concurrence with the objectives of
the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located.
PLANNING COMNIISSION RESOLUTTON FOR
CONDITIONAL LTSE PERNIIT NO. 2005- ll
Page 2 of 3
2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general
welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or
the City, or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City.
In accord with the purposes of the Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code, the City realized that the proposed pet crematorium located at
29360 Hunco Way may have a potential to negatively impact the welfare of persons
residing or working within the neighborhood or the City. Considering this, staff has
substantiated that all applicable City Departments and Agencies have been afforded the
opportunity for a thorough review of the use and have incorporated all applicable
comments and/or conditions related to the control of potential nuisances, so as to
eliminate any negative impacts to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare
of the surrounding neighborhood or the City. Specifically, staff has confzrmed that the
SCAQMD has reviewed the operations of the equipment and determined that no further
environmental review is necessary.
3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and
for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features
required by Title 17 of the LEMC.
The proposed pet crematorium located at 29360 Hunco Way will be non-detractive
business in that the proposed pet crematorium located at 29360 Hunco Way will be
located entirely within an eristing building and has been reviewed by the SCAQMD for
compliance with air quality standards and thresholds.
4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to
width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the
subject use.
The proposed pet crematorium located at 29360 Hunco Way relates to the type and
quantity of tra~c generated, in that the City had previously evaluated the potential
impacts associated with the existing industrial buildings.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Condi ' 1 Use Pe i No. 2005-17.
~~
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
PLANI~IING COMIvIISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITTONAL iTSE PERMIT NO. 2005-17
Page 3 of 3
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on October 18, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANCIA
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners
LARIMER
ATTEST:
Rolfe Preisendanz, Secretary to the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-]29
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAI~ ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1051 MILL STREET.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Joaquim L.
Beltramo, requesting Minor Design Review of a Single-FamilyResidence; and
WHEREAS, the Pluuiing Conunission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibiliry of approving a Minor Design Review for Single FamilyResidences; and
WI-IEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Plaiuiing Coimnission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on October 18, 2005;
NOW TT-~REFORE, the Planning Conunission of the Ciry of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBYRESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Plannuig Comizvssion has considered the proposed request for a Minor
Design Review for a Single Family Residence and has found it acceptable. The Pluuiuig
Commission finds and detemunes that this project is consistent with Chapter 17.23 (R 1, Single
Family Residential District) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMGj and that this action is
exempt from the requiremenu of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to
Secuon 15303;
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will complywith the goaLs and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
Tlae propc~cal Mi~rro~- Design Recrew loratal at ZO51 Mill Stn~t c~lies zeith the gazLs ayel d~jazius ~'tlae
Ger,~ral Plary in tlaat tlae approurl ~this singlefanaly ~siderrx zeill assist in adrieang tlae der~pirern ~a zedl-
&alane~l arxz' fiaxtional na.z ~~sidentia~ mrrm~zia~ irelustria~ a~en spuc~ r~atior~al a~xl iastuytiar~rl la~ad
uses as zaell as erxan-ag'ing the derr~'op»ent ard mairnenca~xe ~a bruzd ran~e ~hauszng typ~ }~ar all inmrre
gmups aml age rat~zrr'~es.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
71ae ~nvpas~l Minrn- Desigri Rezierv laratal at 1051 Mill Str~t is appropriate to tlae size a~xl s~ing
d~»rr~s in that t!~ si~le fanaly lanP has Jx~re daigr,~l in amsideration ~ tlae size arxl sl.etp~e ~ tlae
P~rhS tl~embj' cmatin8 ir2emst a~xl ztt~yir~g ustas as a person ~ along tlae strr~ Funher- tlae projat as
proposal ~eill curr¢~Jzrrent tlae qz~al'uy ~eeistirlg dera'op~reru arxl zeill create a vss~ally pleusin~ nrntcletractize
RESOLUfION NO. 2005-]29
PAGE NO. 2
r~latzonslrip ~ tJae projxxal arzl eezsting projars in tlxit tlae aYd~'u~tural desigry az~or a~rl rmterrals
propnse~ exc~ls tl.~size a~xl d~ign ~'the honrs in tlaesurra~uxlinga~
3. Conditions and safeguards pu~uant to Section 17.82.070, inchid'uig guarantees and evidence of
compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to
insure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and the
p~annina district in which the site is located.
Purs~aru to Sation 17.82.100 (Mi~r Desigrc Reuece~ ~tlae Lake Elsiyrore Mzan¢pal Cale (LEMC), the
proposalMiYear-DesignRerzEwlorated at 1051 Mill Str~ laAS Fx~nsd~dadEeland cazsiderxl forapprourl by tl,e
Plarnur~g Convrassion
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the Ciry
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE of ' or Des~ 'ew for a Single-Family
Residence located at 1051 Mill Street.
//~IA A ~
I,ake Elsinore Plamung Conunission
I herebycenifythat the preceding resolution was adopted bythe Pluuzing Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on October 18, 2005 bythe following vote:
AI'ES: Conunissioneis: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANQA
LARIMER
NOES: Corcunissionexs:
ABSEN'I': Coimnissioneis:
ABSTAIN: Coirunissioners
A
Rolfe Preisendanz, Secretaryto the Pluuvng Conuiussion
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-130
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE aTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 29380 MAES STREET
APN'S 378-193-016, 017, & 018
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Gty of Lake Elsinore by Sharon
Coleman, Coleman Construction, requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for a Single Family
Residence pursuant to Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development
Standards), Chapter 17.23 (R-l, Single Family Residential District) and Chapter 17.66 (parking
Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMq; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Minor Design Review requests for Single Family Residential Projects;
and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on October 18, 2005.
NOW TIIEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECfION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed design for the single
family residence and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and determines that
this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and is exempt from further
environmental clearance under Section 15303, Oass 3(a) (New Construction or Conversion of Small
Structures), of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
SECfION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of the project have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The ~m M imr Desigp Redew la:atai at 29380 MatS Strret wnplies Wth the guls arri Wj<<tiw if the
Gelrral Plan, in that the appror.ul if the sinJe-farrily residen:I! uill assist in ~ the deu:Wprrmt if a Wl-
h:darml arri /un:tiarnl nix if residential, CXJIWl!YCial, industrial, open spare, rer:reational arri institutionallarri
uses as Wl as en::an-agjng the deu:Wprrmt arri trUintenarre if a bratd ra"tJ! if housing, typ6 for all i:rwrrE
groops arri atF catqpries.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The prujJCSm Minor Desigp Redew la:atai at 29380 MatS Strret is apprapri&:e in the size arri surrcurWng
deu:Wprrmt in that the sinJe-farrily residen:I! uill wnplenrnt the quality if lXistirrg, deu:Wprrmt arri uill cn>ate
a Usually pleas~ 11Ol1-detraai:r..e rdationship beturen the prujJCSm arri lXistirrg,proj<<1s in that the arrhi1<<tural
di3igrz, a:1or arri trUterials ~m rrret or lXcmi the size arri di3igp if the hom3 in the surrcurWng an?a.
-
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-130
OCTOBER 18, 2005
Page 2 of 2
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
The ~ed M imr Desigp Redew Uxated at 29380 Maes Strret as mieual am roniiti.orm by all appliaJie
city Di7isians am Departm!nts am A [pKiis, W1l ra haw a si?f1i!U:ant ifffrt an the emirorrm?nt pursuant to
A rtide 19 (CattgJriml Exerrptians) am Sa:tion 15303, Class 3(a) (NewCnnstruaian or Omersian ifSmtll
Stnutures) if the California E mirunm:ntal QIality A a (CE Q4).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Mimr Desigp Redewif a singe farrily residerXJ? Uxated at 29380 Maes Strret has bren eu:duated pursuant to
Sa:tion 17.82.100 (Mimr Desigp ReUeu) if the Lake Elsimre MunUipal CaIe (LEMC) am all a:her
appliaJie S<<1ians if the LEM C The prrjfrt W1S fanrl to re in conpliarKl! Wth all ngJIlations am cbjoctiw if
LEMC
NOW, TI-IEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the Gty
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Minor . n Review or a Single Family Residence
located at 29380 Maes Street.
Ron LaPere, Chainnan
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on October 18,2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANQA,
LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATfEST:
~
Rolfe Preisendanz, Secretary to the Planning Commission
U:\lmiller\ALL FILES\Resolutions-Ordinances \200S\RESO 2005- MDR-SFR 29380 Maes Street 10-18-0S.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-132
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE OTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-42
FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A "SELF-STORAGE
FAOLITY" LOCATED AT 18801 DEXTER AVENUE, APN
377-110- 055.
WHEREAS, Wayne Halland, R Holdings Inc., has initiated proceedings to request the
approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-42 for the establishment of a "Self-Storage Facility"
to be located at 18801 Dexter Avenue, APN 377-110-055; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Permits; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning CoIIl11'lission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on November 1, 2005.
NOW 1HEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOL VB as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Conditional Use
Permit 2004-42 prior to approval. The Planning Commission finds and determines that this project
is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section
15332.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake
Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-42 have been
made as follows:
1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord with the
objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is
located.
In order to adJier.e a 'lREil Wlamrl am fumiornl nix if residential, c:omrmial, irxlustrial, open space,
m:reational am institutional lam uses, staff has ~ly er.aluat<<l the lard use ronpatibility, mise, traffic am
other emironnmtal hazards relatai to the prufJaffi 0nIitianal Use Pemit for the establishrrmt if a "Self
Storag! Facility" la:ated at 18801 Dexter A W1Ue, APN 377-110-055. Acx:ordini-y, the prufJaffi lard use is
in ~ uith the dJjeaius if the Gemral Plan am the purpae if the plannirg distria in uhUh the site is
locaud
2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general
welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the Gty,
or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2004-042
Page 2 of 3
In aa:ord uith the purpaes if the Oxtpter 17.74 (Onlitianal Use Penrits) if the Lake E lsimre M unUipal
Oxle, the City mdizffi that the propaffi Onlitianal Use Pemit for the estdiisbrrmt if a "SelfStorag?
Facility" la:ated at 18801 Dexter A W1Ue, APN 377-110-055, mty haw a pa:ential to nwtiuiy irrpaa the
ue/fare if persons residir16 or mirrg uithin the mg,borhaxl or the City. Omsiderir7t5 this, staJfhas
substantiated that all applicable City Departrrmts am A ~ haw been ajfardtxi the opportunity for a
~ reUew if the use am haw irrorporated all applicable ron1I1'FJ1tS arKi/ or wrxlitians rr:/4ted to installation
am rmintenanre if IarKiscapi"& strret dalications, ~ if points if uhiaJar ingress am tgms am aJr'Itrd
if pa:ential nuisarm, so as to elirrinate any nwtiw irrpaa:s to the fFFfal health, safEty, wnfart, or fFFfal
udfare if the sunuurxlir16 mg,borhaxl or the City.
3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all
the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required by Title 17
of the LEMC
The propaffi Onlitianal Use Pemit for the estdiisbrrmt if a "SelfStorag? Facility" la:ated 18801 Dexter
A W1Ue, APN 377-110-055, has been designxi in wnsideration if the size am shape if the prq;erty, thereby
slrerf!henirr5 am enhan:ir1t, the immrliate irxlustrial amt. Further, the prrjat as propa<<i, Wll ronplerrmt the
quality if ex istirrg deu:loprrmt am Wll create a Usually pleasirr& mndetraaiw relationship lmu:en the propaffi
am ex istir16 projeas, in that the propaffi use has been reriewxl to ensure adiquate prmision if screenitrg,frum the
publU: rip-cfwry or adjcKent properties.
4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width
and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use.
The propaffi Onlitianal Use Pemit for the estdiisbrrmt if a "SelfS torag? Facility" la:ated at 18810 Dexter
A W1Ue, A PN 377-110-055, has been reriewxl as to its rrlation to the Wdth am type if paW7l?nt rm1ai to
carry the type am quantity if traffic fFFfated, in that the City has adequatdyeu:duated the pa:ential irrpaa:s
asSocUlted uith the propaffi uses prior to its ctppraud am has anIitioml the prrjat to be serud by ro:uIs if
adtrjuate capacity am design starxlards to prmide rftlSanable aaISS by car, trude, transit, am bicy;Je.
5. In approving the subject use located at 18801 Dexter Avenue, there will be no adverse affect on
abutting property or the permitted and normal use thereof.
The propaffi use has been ~ly reriewxl am anIitioml by all applicable City Departrrmts am outside
A~, elirrinating the pa:ential for any am all cu:herse iffeas on the abuttingproperty.
6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.74.50 of the LEMC have been
incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Permit to insure that the use continues in
a manner envisioned by these findings for the term of the use.
Pursuant to Sation 17. 74.050 (A ction if the Planning OJmnission) if the Lake E lsimre MunUipal Oxle
(LEMC), the propaffi Onlitianal Use Pemit for the estaliisbrrmt if a "SelfStorag? Facility" la:ated at
18801 Dexter A W1Ue, APN 377-110-055, has beensclxtlulmforwnsiderationamctppraud if the Plannirrg
OJmnission.
NOW, lHEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the Gty
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-42.
--
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2004-042
Page 3 of 3
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Q)IIunission at a meeting
thereof conducted on November 1,2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANQA,
LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
-
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
~:ndanz, Secrelatyto the
Planning Commission
-
-....
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-133
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL
DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-09 FOR A SELF-STORAGE
FACILITY LOCATED AT 18801 DEXTER AVENUE, APN
377-110-055.
WHEREAS, Wayne Halland, R Holdings Inc. has initiated proceedings for Industrial
Design Review No. 2004-09 for the construction of a self-storage facility with related
improvements located at 18801 Dexter Avenue, APN 377-110-055; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for Design Reviews; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on November 1,
2005.
-
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered Industrial Design Review No.
2004-09 prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed
self-storage facility. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the project is exempt
from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section
15332.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Industrial Design Review No. 2004-09
have been made as follows:
FINDINGS - INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan
and the Zoning District in which the project is located.
The proposed Industrial Design Review, located at 18801 Dexter Avenue, APN 377-110-
055, complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan, in that the approval of
this industrial project will assist in achieving the development of a well-balanced and
functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and
institutional land uses as well as encouraging industrial land uses to diversify Lake
Elsinore's economic base.
U:\rnharris \Halland Mini Storage Facility\PC RESO DRdoc
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION
DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-09
Page 2 of 3
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all
other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The proposed Industrial Design Review, located at 18801 Dexter Avenue, APN 377-110-
055, is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the industrial project
has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby creating
interest and varying vistas as a person moves along the street. Further the project as
proposed will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually
pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects in that
the architectural design, color, materials and site design proposed evidence a concern
for quality and originality.
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to
result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed Industrial
Design Review located at Assessor Parcel Number 377-110-055, as reviewed and
conditioned by all applicable City Divisions and Departments and Agencies, will not
have a significant effect on the environment pursuant to Article 19 (Categorical
Exemptions) and Section 15332; (Infill Development).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with
the objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed Industrial Design Review located at 18801
Dexter Avenue, APN 377-110-055, has been scheduled for consideration and approval
of the Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve Industrial Design Review No. 2004-09;
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
U:\mharris\Halland Mini Storage Facility\PCRESO DRdoc
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION
DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-09
Page 3 of 3
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on November 1, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANaA,
LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
/~
Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Secretary to the
Planning Commission
U: \mharris \Halland Mini Storage Facility\PC RESO DRdoc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-134
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE OTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING OTY COUNOL APPROVAL OF
INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-03
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by VanDerHoek
Architects, Inc., to request approval of Industrial Design Review No. 2005-03 for an industrial
complex located on 1.69 acres of vacant land; and
WHEREAS, the Planning O:>mmission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Design Reviews for industrial projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning O:>mmission
has considered evidence presented by the O:>mmunity Development Department and other
interested parties at a public meeting held with respect to this item on November 1, 2005; and
NOW 1HEREFORE, the Planning O:>mmission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning O:>mmission has considered the proposed request for the
Industrial Design Review No. 2005-03 and has found it acceptable. The Planning O:>mmission finds
and determines this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal O:>de and that this action
is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to
Saxion 15332 (In-FiB Development Projects).
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal O:>de the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The prapaed Irrlustrial Design Redew locaud at the rmheast CO"t"J'1!r if M inthom am 3m S trrets amplies Wth
the gds am objaxiu:s if the Gerx?ral Plan, in that the appraud if this irrIustrial amplex Wll assist in adJiering
the deuloprrmt if a wll-Wlarml am fim:tional nix if residentittl, CXJm1FYCial, irrIustrial, q;en sfJcKE,
m:reational am institutional lam uses as wll as errouragjng irrIustriallam uses to diwsify Lake E lsirvre's
(W)1(Jf}i,c base
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal O:>de.
The prapaed Irrlustrial Design Redew locaud at the rmheast CO"t"J'1!r if M inthom am 3m Strrets is appropriate
to the site am surrourWng deu:laprrmts in that the prapaed irrlustrial amplex has lID1 desif!lHl in
ronsideration if the size am shape if the property, thereby creating interest am mrying Usfas as a person m:JU'S
alOJ7i!, the strret. FUJ1her the projax as prapaed Wll corrplerrmt the quality if ecisting deuloprrmt am Wll
create a Usually pleasir1& norHietraai:,.e rr.l4tionship betueen the prapaed am ecisting proj<<ts in that the
arrhitaxural design, cdor am mtterial am site desifllS prapaed eUt:IerKE a carx:ern for quality am oriWdity.
RESOLUfION NO. 2005- 134
PAGE NO.2
3. Subject to the attached Qmditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuant to the Cdifamia E mirrJJ11rEJ1tal QIality A a (CE QA), the profJatd IrKiustrid Df3igp Rec.iew la:atal
at the mrtheast wrner if M intham ani 3m S trrets, as redecmi ani rorrlitioml by all applicable City Di'lisWns
ani Departrrmts ani A~, Wll mt haw a significant iffoct an the emiror1l1l!l1t pursuant to Soction 15332
(In-Fill Development Projects).
4. Qmditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuant to Soction 17.82.070 (Aaion if the Plannirrg OJmrission) if the Lake Elsimre MunUipal Oxle
(LE M C), the ~td IrKiustrid Df3igp Rec.iew la:atal at the mrtheast wrner if M intham am 3m. Strret has
been sdxrluk1 far CDJ1Sideratian am appruud by the Plannirrg OJmrission.
NOW, TIIEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the Gty
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECDMMEND TO TIIE aTY CDUNaL APPROVAL of
Industrial Design Review No. 2005-03.
{;i~
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on November 1,2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANaA,
LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
d~;;;;;emh.nz, Secretary to the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-135
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE aTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-
07; FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A MANUFACTURED
DUPLEX DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Gty of Lake Elsinore by Daniel Lopez to
request the approval of Residential Design Review No. 2005-07 for the design, construction and
establishment of a residential condominium community; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of recommending approval of Design Reviews for residential projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on November 1, 2005.
NOW TIffiREFORE, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SE CTI ON 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for
Residential Design Review No. 2005-07 and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission
finds and determines that this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and
determines that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant to Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects, and based upon the following findings and
determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the project have been made as follows:
FINDINGS - DESIGN REVIEW
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The propacd R(3identiaJ, D(3ig;z Redew contairKri herein wrrplies Wth the gxOs am Wj<<:ti1.Ps if the Gereral
Plan, in that the appruu:d if these duplex(3 W1l assist in adiedng the dere/oprrmt if a udl-b::darmi am
fimaional rrix if residential, Wl77I7'l?rCial, irrlustrial, open space, m:reatianal am institutional lam t{S(3 as
udl as encaffa[!}ng irrlustriallam t{S(3 to di7EYSify Lake E lsinore's ~ w.se
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The propacd R(3identid D(3ig;z Redew contairxd herein is appropriate to the site am sunuurrlirrg deuJoprrmts
in that the duplex projm has ken dEsi?fHl in amsideratian if the size am shape if the prcperty, thereby credting
interest am wrying 'listas as a person mJr.RS along the strret. Further the projm as propatd W1l create a 'lisually
U:\aresendiz\R 2005-07 Graham Street\R 2005-07 RESO.doc
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-07
Page 2 of 2
pleasint, mn-detraaiw relationship l:m.eeen the propa<<l am ex istint, Jmiocts in the archiurtural di5igp, o:ior am
mu:eriaIs am site di5ign propa<<l eriderx:e a rorxem for quality am origjrnlity.
3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuant to Sfftion 17.82.070 (Aaion if the Planning Commiss~ if the Lake Elsimre MunUipal 0xIe
(LEMq, the propa<<l Residential Design Reriew rrfererml herein has bren s~ for consideration am
apprau:d if the Planning Commission.
NOW, 1HEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the Gty
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Residential Design Review No. 2005-07.
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on November 1, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANOA,
LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
1J1n----
Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Secretary to the Planning Commission
U:\aresendiz\R 2005-07 Graham Street\R 2005-07 RESO.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 136
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-
13 WHICH ENTAILS DESIGN REVIEW OF A THREE.
PLAN MODEL HOME COMPLEX AND PRODUCTION
UNITS WHICH WILL BE CONSTRUCTED
THROUGHOUT 131 SINGLE. FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
LOTS WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 30493
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Gty of Lake Elsinore by Pulte Homes
requesting Design Review approval of a three-plan Model Home Complex and ultimate
development of production units throughout 131 lots within Tract Map No. 30493. The proposed
residential lots comprise approximately 28.53 acres and are located north of Canyon Hills Road and
east of Hillside Drive and is defined as Planning Area 21B by the Canyon Hills Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Design Review requests for residential projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public meeting held with respect to this item on November 1,2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECfION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed design for the three-
plan Model Home Complex and production units and has found them acceptable. The Planning
Commission finds and determines this project is consistent with the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and
the 2003 Addendum to the 1989 Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report.
Under Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, this project
has been declared exempt from further environmental clearance.
SECfION 2. That in accordance with Section 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of Residential Project No. 2005-13 have
been made as follows:
1. Subject to the attached conditions the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any
significant adverse environmental impacts.
staff has determimi that this prujea is wnsistent uith the G:tnpn Hills SfXUfic Plan am Tract Map No
30493. The 2003 Adderxiumto the 1989 Final G:tnpnHilIs SfXUfic Plan Emi:runnwtal Inpact Report
prmik adtrJuate emironm?l1tal ckararxe am analy;is for this ~<<l Desigp Redew application. Urder
Seaion 15182 if the G:tlifornia E rnironm?l1tal Qtality A a (CE QA) Guidelirx3, this prqea has bren dalaml
txerrpt /rum further emironm?l1tal ckararre
2. The project complies with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the General Plan and the
Canyon Hills Specific Plan, as approved.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-136
PAGE 2
As disatSsffi, the General Plan ckignate> the projea site as "Canpn Hills SJXXific Plan". The Canpn Hills
SJXXific Plan ckignate> the projea site as SF3. Tract Map Na 30493 am the propa<<i mxid!xJnr ronplex
am prrxiuaion units are wnsistent uith the SF 3 ckignation am applia:Wle deu10prrmt am ckign starxlards.
3. 1bis project complies with the design directives contained in Chapter 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Cbde.
The propa<<i projea is appropriate to the site am surrvurxling deu:loprrmts in that the projea W1l wnstruct
si11fie-farrily detadxrl units in aamriarx:e uith appropriate deu10prrmt am ckign starxlards rontaimJ in the
Canpn Hills SJXXific Plan The projea crr:ate> inten5t am mrying tistas as a person trmIS alarrt, any projea
strret. The projea also ronplerrmts the quality if er:istirfs mg,borirrg deu10prrmt am W1l wntinue to prudde
tisuallypkasing ckign am arrhite:ture uithin the Canpn Hills area.
4. Cbnditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of
compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the project to ensure
development of the property in accordance with the General Plan, Municipal Cbde, and Canyon
Hills Specific Plan, as approved.
The Pumning Comrission has wnsidered the projea am firxls that uith rorr1itions if approu;d, the projea
emplies uith the ~r3 am dJjeaiw if the Rr3idential Dr3ign Redewprrms.
NOW, 1HEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Cbmmission of the Gty
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Residential Project No. 2005-13.
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Cbmmission at a meeting
thereof conducted on November 1, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Cbmmissioners :
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANOA,
LARIMER
NOES: Cbmmissioners:
ABSENT: Cbmmissioners:
ABSTAIN: Cbmmissioners:
A~
Rolfe Preisendanz, Secretary to the
Planning Cbmmission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-137
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE aTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 2005-09
FOR THE INSTALLATION OF AN UNMANNED
WIRELESS FAaLTIY FOR aNGULAR WIRELESS
LOCATED AT THE CANYON HILLS WATER TANK SITE.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Cingular
CDmmunications, to request approval of CDnditional Use Pennit for the installation of an
unmanned WIreless CDmmunication Facility located at the Canyon Hills Water Tank Site; and
WHEREAS, the Planning CDmmission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving CDnditional Use Pennits; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning CDmmission
has considered evidence presented by the CDmmunity Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on November 1, 2005.
NOW TIIEREFORE, the Planning CDmmission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning CDmmission has considered the proposed design for the
installation of an unmanned WIreless CDmmunication Facility located at the Canyon Hills Water
Tank Site and has found it acceptable. The Planning CDmmission finds and determines this project
is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal CDde and that this action is exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15303.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.74 (CDnditional Use Pennit) of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal CDde the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows:
FINDINGS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The propaad cmlitional Use Pemit applit:ation wnplies uith the g1:ds ani chja:tiu:s if the GerlJral Plan, in
that the appraud if this uirekss COJ11J1UI1ication facility Wll assist in achiering the cleuioprmTt if a uell-Wlarmi
am fim:.tional rrix if residential, aJl?7J1FYCial, irrlustrial, open space, 1fX:Yf!ational am institutional lam uses as
uell as inprme uirekss COJ11J1UI1ication cmerage for the gerK?ral public ani city if Lake E lsirvre residents in the
imm/iate area Further, adequate ronditions am saf~rds pursuant to Soction 17.76.050 if the Lake
E lsinore Municipal 0xIe (LEM C), haw bren irwrporat<<i in the appraud if the wnarKe to insure cleuioprmTt
if the property in aa:ord uith the chja:tiu:s if the Ge1rral Plan ani the ~e if the pla11l'ling distria: in 7Rhid:J
the site is located
2. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general
welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City,
or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City.
RESOLUfION NO. 2005-137
Page 2 of 4
The city rrny wrrlua a peria& reriew if the uire/e;s rorrmmKatian facility to wnsider WJether or rK1: the facility
is rorfaming uith the (iniudirrg the co-~ anlitions if its discretionary apprautl or apprq>>iate pemits.
The city shall wnsider WJether or rK1: the facility is rorflUtirrg, uith ~ lam USe5 appruu:d wrler the
applicable rruster or spe::ifr plan If the city rorrluk that adrerse irrpaa:s to em!f'i!ing lam USe5 can be mIumi
throutP the use if rrw ~ or throutP the retirenm if the anrent facility, the carriers shall 7R.Drk uith the
city to der.elop a plan for adJieUng the5e rritiguing gxds. The city rrny inpae a rorrlitian liniting the duration if
any pernit for a uire/e;s ~ion facility loo:tted on property only after mtking~ if faa that sum a
wrrJition is wrranted A s part if sum wrrJition, the city shall sprofj the deuloprrmt threshdd 7ihUh cadd
triW termination if the pernit fdlooing a duly mtiaxl puhlic hearirl&
Sew-a! national am international OY[Fnizations haw e5tdiislxd [jdddirx:s for humm ex~ure to radio
frrquerx:y ~ These iniude the Institute if Eltrtrical am EIe::trrJrro Enpjrms (IEEE), Comritta:! on
Man am Radiation (COMAR), am the rro:Jfl1J11?J1ttions if the National Cam:il on Radiation Prmrtion
am Measurerrmts (NCRP), the International OJmmission on NmIanizing Radiation Prmrtion
(ICNIRP), am the National Radiation Prr:t<<tion Ba:trd (NRPB) in the Uniurl KirgJom While the5e
[jdddirx:s differ in Sam? respw:s, their limits in the frrquerx:y ra11[!? usai by uire/e;s CXJI'J1J'rUflka deda3 are
broully siniJar. The wnsensus if the scientijU: romrmnity, as rifl,atm in the5e ex~ure [jdddirx:s, is that
expaure to Radio Frequerx:y (RF) erFrgJI below~ limits in the5e [!jIidelirx:s is safe.
If any uire/e;s Wl71J1UI'lia:ttion facility or attadxri uire/e;s rorrmmKatian facility is rK1: operated for a cantimtaIS
perial if six rmnths, the senire prcrdder shall naify the planning dim:tar. A uire/e;s rorrmmKatian facility shall
be wnsidenxi aktrxloml am shall be renvuxi by the facility CRR.n?Y' uithin the rrxt six rmnths am the site
restorni !xuk to its oripjnal setting The city rrny, at its discretion, nYjUire the ~ting if a peifarm:t1'X'e surety to
cmer the ~t if the rerruu:d if aktrxloml facilities.
3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all
the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required.
The la:ation for the propaai Corxiitional Use Pemit is appropriate to the site am surrouniing deuioprrrnts in
that the uire/e;s rorrmmKatian facility has been de5igpxi uith stRalth irrprocerrrnts (propaai as a faux baJders
am tan aiorrd rorrmmKatian lrjUiprrmt) in wnsideration if the size am shape if the property. Further the
propaai uire/e;s Wl71J1UI'lia:ttion facility uill ronplem!nt the quality if the existing deuloprrmt am uill create a
Usually pkasi"& mn-detraaiw relationship b::tw:en the propaai am existing projeas in arrhitatura! de5ign,
cdor am mtterials
4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width
and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use.
The additional traffic wrrat<<l by the apprautl if this Corxiitional Use Pemit applUution, uill rK1: be
sigpifi:ard:, due to the faa that the5e facilities nYjUiml mmrrum mtintena1'X'e am that the site has an existing
tuenty (20) fax Wde paw ingress/tgre5s easemmt from Orlar La~ b::tw:en the existing residential units to
allow ctal3S to a se:xJJ1dary ten (10) fax Wde paw ctal3S easem!J1t that Ie:uJs up to the existing wtre/e;s
OJmmmication Facility at the top if the hill
U:\aresendiz\CUP 2005-09 ONGULAR\PCReso.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-137
Page 3 of 4
5. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The propaed OnIitionaJ Use Pemit is appropriate to the site am surrrxmling deuJqmmts in that the W:niess
aJI11J1U1liI:ation fadlity am antem1aS haw ken desigml uith st<h irrprmenwts (propaed as faux badders
uire/e;s romntnication fadlity) in consideration if the size am shape if the prrperty. Further the propaed
uire/e;s aJI11J1U1liI:ation fadlity W11 rorrplem!nt the quality if the exis~ c/eu;/qmrnt am W11 cn?ate a 7isually
pleasi11& nan-detractiw niationship betwm the propaed am exis~fadlity in arrhitatural design, aiar am
maeriaIs.
6. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuant to the Gdifamia E mirrJl1J1'El1J:tt QIality A a (CE Q4), the propaed Vanan:e la:ateJ at APN 373-
143-003, as reUeued am rorxIitiorxrl by all applia:tble city Di7isions am Departm?r1tS am AwrUs, W11 rK1:
haw a sif!J1ifU:ant iffax on the emirrJrlJ1'FJ1t pursuant to A rtide 19 (Categorical Exemptions) am Soctian
15303 (New Constroction or Conversion of Small StrocWres).
7. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapters 17.74, Conditional Use Permit; and 17.82, of
the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been
inco1porated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in
accordance with the objectives of Chapters 17.74 and 17.82.
The City ro:dizl5 that certain USl5 haw operational charcuteristics that, deperr1ing upon the la:atian am design if
the use, rmy haw the paentid to rx.;g:ttiuly inpaa adjoining prrperties, busin:sS6, or nsidents. Said USl5
therif'ore rapdre a nvre ronprrhensiw reUew am appraud pnmlure, in:luding, the ahility to anlition the prc!fXt,
in order to mitig:tte any detemimi irrpaa. In order to adier.e this ~e, the Planning Cormission is
enpou.ered to ?fant am to deny applications for 0nIiti0nal Use Perrrits am to .e reasanahle anlitions
upon the ?fanting if OnIitionaJ Use Perrrits. A 0nIiti0nal Use Pemit rmy h? ?fantal for a linital tinr
periaJ, am rmy h? ?fantal subjax to SuUJ anlitions as the Cormission rmy pnscrihe 0nIiti0ns rmy irdude,
but are rK1: limitaJ to, paym?11t if f<<:s; rfrJuirerrents for sproal )Urds, cpen spaas, buffers, [erm am _;
rfrJuiring installation am rmintenan:e if larxlscapintJi strret dedications am wual irfrastn<<:ture irrprmenwts;
rrg;dations if points if uhiaJar ingrrss am egnss; cantrd if tra/fr circulation; reg;Jation if sigps; rrg;dations if
hours if operation am rrEtIxxJs if operation; limitations on atterKiarre; cantrd if paential nuisarm; pnscribirrt,
staraiards if rmintenan:e if ~ am grrwnis; phasintJi c/eu;/qmrnt staraiards; am suUJ aher anlitions as
the Cormission rmy deem rm!Ssary to ensure corrpatibility if the use uith Surrr:AllWng c/eu;/qmrnt am pnsene
the public health, safety am udfare.
NOW, TIIEREFORE, based on the above F . gs, the Planning Commission of the Gty
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Con tion Use Pe o. CUP 2005-09.
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
U:\aresendiz\CUP 2005-09 ONGULAR\PC Reso.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-137
Page 4 of 4
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Omllnission at a meeting
thereof conducted on November 1, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANOA,
LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
~
Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Secretary to the Planning Commission
U:\aresendiz\ClJP 2005-09 ONGULAR\PC Reso.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-138
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE QTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 16935 PIERROTT
AVENUE.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the aty of Lake Elsinore by Rigoberto
Zavala, requesting Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence; and
WHEREAS, the Planning CDmmission of the aty of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving a Minor Design Review for Single Family Residences; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning CDmmission
has considered evidence presented by the CDnununity Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on November 1,2005;
NOW 1HEREFORE, the Planning CDmmission of the aty of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECfION 1. The Planning CDmmission has considered the proposed request for a Minor
Design Review for a Single Family Residence and has found it acceptable. The Planning
CDmmission finds and determines that this project is consistent with Chapter 17.23 ("R-l) of the
Lake Elsinore Municipal CDde and that this action is exempt from the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303;
SECfION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal CDde the following findings for the have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The propar:d Mimr Desilfll Reriewla:ata:l at 16935 Pierrott A wnue conplies Wth the [p1ls am dJja:tiw if
the GeJrral Plan, in that the approud if this sirrJe-farrily residerx:e W/1 assist in adJieUrrt, the deuJoprrmt if a
ucIl-mJarml am jUrx;tional nix if residential, comm;rda/, irxlustrial, open sptue, rrxreational am institutional
lam uses as ucIl as erm.tragjrrt, the deuJoprrmt am rmintenaOO! if a brou1 rarllf if haising types far all irxxJm.?
groups am ag! catlg>>ies.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal CDde.
The propar:dMimr DesilfllReriewla:ata:l at 16935 Pierrott A wnue is appropriate to the site am surratrWrrt,
deu:loprrmts in that the sirrJe farrily horrr has bren dtsiwm in amsideration if the size am shape if the
property, thereby creating interest am m~ 'listas as a person m:JU3 along the strret. Further the projfft as
propar:d W/1 conplerrmt the quality if existing deuJoprrmt am W/1 create a 'lisually pleas~ mn-detraaiw
relationship kt'UPen the prapar:d am existing projocts in that the arrhitatural dtsigp, a:lor am rmterials
prapar:d excmls the size am dtsilfll if the!xJnr; in the surrourxlirrt, arm
U:\aresendiz\MDR OF A SFR@ 16935 PIERROTI\PC RESO .doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-138
Page 2of2
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuant to the California Emiramrmtal QIalityAct (CEQA), the~edMimr Df5igpRedewla:aurlat
16395 Pierrat A W1Ue, as ~ am anIitiomi by all applical:ie City Di7isions am Departrrmts am
Awm, Wll m haw a significant iffoct an the emirorrrrrnt pursuant to A rtide 19 (Categorical
Exemptions) am Soctian 15303 (New Constroction or Conversion of SmaU Stroctures).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of
compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to
insure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and the
planning district in which the site is located.
Pursuant to Soctian 17.82.100 (Mimr Df5igpReUeu) if the Lake Elsimre Muniapal Cafe (LEMC), the
~edMimr Df5igpRedewla:aurlat 16935 PierratA W1Ue has been sdxrJuled am ronsiderrdforappruu:d
by the Planning Comnission
NOW, TIffiREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the Gty
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE of the Minor Design Review for a Single-Family
Residence located at 16935 Pierrott Avenue.
Ron re, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on November 1,2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANOA,
LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners
A~
Rolfe M Preisendanz, Secretary to the Planning Commission
U:\aresendiz\MDROF ASFR@ 16935 PIERROffiPCRESO .doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-139
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE aTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES LOCATED AT 16380 AND
16382 LAKE SHORE AVENUE, ASSESSOR PARCEL
NUMBER(S) 378-312-004 & -005.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Gty of Lake Elsinore by Hector Zubieta,
requesting Minor Design Review of two detached Single-Family Residences; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Gmunission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving a Minor Design Review for Single Family Residences; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on November 15, 2005.
NOW 1HEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for a Minor
Design Review for two detached Single Family Residences and has found them acceptable. The
Planning Commission finds and determines that this project is consistent with Chapter 17.23 (R-1
Single-Family Residential District) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and that this action is
exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to
Section 15303.a.;
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The prq;a<<i M imr DC5if!1l Redew kraud at 16380 am 16382 LakC5hare A 7eJ1Ue ronpliRs Wth the gxis
am dJjoctiu:s if the Gerual Plan, in that the appruud if these sintie- fanily residerm uill assist in cuhiecirrt, the
clezelqmwt if a WJ-mtarml am fun:tiarnl rrix if residential, aJtml!YCial, irxIustridl, open spcta!, nrreatianal
am institutional lam USC5 as uell as errourafing the deuJoprrrnt am rmintenan:e if a brnuJ ra1lJ? if hatsing
types for all in:orrE groups am age categ;riRs.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The prq;a<<i M imr DC5if!1l Redew kraud at 16380 am 16382 LakC5hare A 7eJ1Ue is appropriate to the site
am surraniing dereloprrmts in that the sirrJe fanily IxInFs haw b?en irmrporaud into the tqxgrapby if the
property, creating interest am mrying Ustas as a person rrm.es alorrg, the strret. Further the prrja:t as prq;a<<i
uill ronpknwt, as uell as excmi the qualiry if existing clezelqmwt am uill orate a Usually pleas~ mn-
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-132
PAGE NO.2
detraai:ce rdatianship kturen the ~m, am existint5 prcjocts in that the archi18:tural d6ign, cdor am
rruterials ~m, excmls the size arri/ ar d6igp. if the hams in the sunwrxling a1m
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuant to the California Emirarrrrmtal QialityAa (CEQ4), the~m,Mimr Df3igp.Reriewla:ataiat
16380 am 16382 Lakf3M DriU?, as rf?liewd am rorrlitiorm by all applicalie City DiUsions am
Departm!r1tS am A wOO, W11 m haw a signifrant fjfirt an the emi:romrmt pursuant to A rtide 19
(Categorical Exemptions) am SfXtion 15303.a. (New Construction or Convenion of SmaU
Structures).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incOlporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
-
Pursuant to SfXtion 17.82.100 (Mimr Df5igp. Redeu) if the Lake Elsimre Municipal 0x1e (LEMC), the
~m, Minor Df5igp. Reriew la:atai at 16380 am 16382 Lakf5M Driw has I:xm sch<<1ulai am
ronsidered far appruud by the Pla1111irf, GmrrisS1m
NOW, TI-IEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Plarming Commission of the Gty
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE of the Minor Design Review for two Single-Family
Residences located at 16380 and 16382 Lakeshore Avenue.
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning (})nunission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on November 15, 2005 by the following vote:
U\mharris \ Two Jeff Howie Residences \PC RESO Minor Design Review.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-132
PAGE NO.3
AYES:
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANQA,
LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
A~
Rolfe M Preisendanz, Secretary to the Planning Commission
U:\mharris\ Two Jeff Howie Residences\PC RESO Minor Design Review.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-140
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE QTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 2005-06 FOR A REDUCTION
IN FRONT AND REAR YARD SETBACK
REQUIREMENTS FOR TWO DETACHED SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCES LOCATED AT 16380 AND 16382
LAKESHORE AVENUE, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S)
378-312-004 & -005.
WHEREAS, Hector Zubieta initiated proceedings for the approval of Variance No. 2005-06
for two Single Family Residences; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Gnnmission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Variances; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on November 15, 2005.
NOW 1HEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Variance No. 2005-
06 prior to approval. The Planning Commission finds and determines that this project is consistent
with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the California Subdivision Map Act and that no further
environmental review is necessary pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects):
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the Gty of Lake
Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Variance No. 2005-06 has been made as follows:
1. That adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.76.050 have been incorporated
into the approval of the Variance to insure development of the property in accord with the
objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is
located.
The utnanre is rxressitatHl by the General Plan Circulation E len-mt nquirenrnt for dtr1ication rxressary to
adiere the ultirrute mul rifin-cfwry to ~y serre bah la:al am pass-t:IJraW traffic Wthin the
nij;borhaxi. N ex gra~ a mriarxe 'lUJUid a:herWse result in a sigpificant rr:rluaion to the deuiqmwt
paential if the property thus crattirrg a hardship for the property 0W'l!r. TherrfOYF?, the mriarxe is in aamd Wth
the dJjoctiw if the Gelrral Plan am the purfJae if the planning distria.
2. That there are special circumstances, pursuant to the purpose of this Chapter, applicable to the
subject property which do not apply generally to other properties in the neighborhood, and,
therefore, granting of the Variance shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION FOR
VARIANCE NO. 2005-06
July 5, 2005
Page 2 of2
with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and district in which the subject
property is located.
The City has anludm that cunsiderirrg that a:her prupertU5 in the Winity 7iEYe aJkmpd to deu1qJ mer the )Rt1S
Wthaa JmYliding, the sanr armmt if rign-cfwry dHJU:ation, the granting, if a fa<< fixL six-inh (4'_6"')
cla:rmse in ba:h the frurrt amn>ar )Urd sedw.ks Wl1 ra cunstitute a grant if sp<<ial pri~ inxJnsistent uith
the lirritations upon a:her prupertU5 in the Winity am distria in 7ihidJ the subjoct prqoct is loomd
3. That in approving the Variance, any reductions authorized from the strict interpretation of the
Zoning Ordinance represents the minimum deviation from the Code necessary to fulfill the
purpose of this Chapter and enable reasonable development of the property.
In granting, a fa<<-fixx:, six inh (4'_6'') cla:rmse in the frurrt amn>ar)Urd sedw.ks the City has deterrrinri that
the 1'ffjUfSt for a utriatre Wl1 reJm3ent the rrirrirnfm dedatian from the Oxie rm:ssary to.fiJjiJl the purpae if
this Oxtpter am enalie rwsanabk derEkptrmt if the property.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above . dings, the Planning Commission of the Gty
_ of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY approve Varian e No 2~~
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on November 15, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, FRANOA,
LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
RESOLUfION NO. 2005-141
A RESOLUfION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE OTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-15
FOR THE ALLOWANCE OF HOTELS AS A
CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE ON TWO PARCELS
AND TO ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A HOTEL
FAOLITY ON ONE PARCEL WITHIN THE
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMEROAL (C1/SP) ZONING
DISTRICf OF THE CANYON CREEK "SUMMERHILL"
SPEOFIC PLAN.
WHEREAS, Sachin Trivedi, Shiva Management., has initiated proceedings to request the
approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-15 for the allowance of hotel facilities as a
conditionally permitted use on two sites and to establish and operate a hotel facility on one parcel
within the Neighborhood Commercial (G liSP) zoning district of the Canyon Creek "Sununerhill"
Specific Plan located at APNs 363-670-006,007 & 363-550-013,014; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Permits; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on November 15,2005.
NOW TI-IEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECfION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Conditional Use
Permit 2005-15 prior to approval. The Planning Commission finds and determines that this project
is consistent with the previously certified Environmental Impact Report for the Canyon Creek
"Sununerhill" Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 and that no further environmental review is
necessary pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15162.
SECfION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the Gty of Lake
Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-15 have been
made as follows:
1. The proposed hotel use on two separate sites, and the establishment and operation of a hotel
facility on one site, on its own merits and within the context of the settings, is in accord with the
objectives of the General Plan, Canyon Creek Specific Plan and the purpose of the planning
district in which the site is located.
In order to adJiere a ue1l Wlarml am jUrxtional nix if residential, CXJl11IY1!rCial irKiustrial, open spcu::e,
mreational am institutional lam USlS, staff has t:horatgJly euduaud the lard use ronpatihility, mise, traffic am
aher emi:ronrrrntal hazards reIat<<l to the propaffi Oniitional Use Pernit far the alkmurKe if haxJs as a
corrIitiona11y pemitt<<l use am far the lStablishrrEnt ard operation if a 41,680 square fax had facility Wthin
-
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUnON FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2005-15
Page 2 of 3
the Neig;barIxxxi 0Jmnrrcial (Cl/SP) zoning district if the Gt~ CreiR "Sumrrrhill" Sprofic Plan
A a:nrdinJy, the prcfJawi lam use is in wrx:urrerre Wth the dJjocti'U?S if the Gelrral Plan, Gt~ CreiR
"Sumrrrhill" Sprofic Plan am the purpae if the planning district in 7ihich the site is kx:ated
2. The proposed hotel uses on two separate sites and establishment and operation of a hotel facility
on one site, will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of
persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the Gty, or
injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the Gty.
In aaurd Wth the purpa(3 if the Oxtpter 17. 74 (Corxlitianal Use Pemits) if the Lake E lsimre Munidpal
~ the CUy realizwi that the prcfJawi Corxlitianal Use Pemit far the t:tllmmrx:e if had faciliti15 am the
(3taliishrrrnt am cperatian if a 41,680 square fax had facilUy Wthin the Neig;barIxxxi 0Jmnrrcial (C
l/SP) zoning district if the Gt~ CreiR "SumrFYhil/: Sprofic Plan mty haw a paentid to ~y irrpaa
the 'llPifare if persons nsiding ar 'W11king Wthin the rxdg;barIxxxi ar the city. Considering this, st4f has
sumtarrtiatal that all applical:ie CUy Departrrrrtts am A~ haw lren afforded the opportunity far a
tharat[jJ redew if the use am haw irwrporaurl all applical:ie comrmts arrl/ ar rorxlitions relaurl to the use
3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all
the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required by the
Municipal Code.
The prcfJawi Corxlitianal Use Pemit far the (3taliishrrrnt if a had facilUy la:atal at A PN 363-670-006,007
has lren ckigprl in ronsideration if the size am shape if the property, therdJy s~ am enha'frints the
irnmrIiate aJI11J11?ltial arm Further, the projoct as prcfJawi Wll ronplerrrnt the qua/Uy if ex; isting der.daprrmt
in the 'licinity.
4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width
and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use.
The prcfJawi Corxlitianal Use Pemit far the (3taliishrrrnt if a had facilUy la:atal at APN's 363-670-
006,007, has lren ~ as to its rrlation to the Wdth am type if pa7El1'EJ1t rmltri to cany the type am
qua/Uy if trafjik wrrat<</, in that the CUy has adtrjuatdy euduaurl the paentid inpads associaurl Wth the
prcfJawi use am haw rorrIitiomi the projoct aa:nrdirrJy.
5. That in approving the subject use at the specific location, there will be no adverse effect on
abutting property or the pennitted and normal use thereof.
The prcfJawi use has lren tharat[jJly ~ am rorrIitiomi by all applical:ie CUy Departrrrrtts am Ottside
A writs, rlininating the paentid far any am all adterse ifJ<<ts on abuttirrg,prq;erties.
6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.74.50 of the LEMC have been
incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Pennit.
Pursuarrt to Seaion 17.74.050 (Aaion if the Planning Comniss~ if the Lake Elsimre Munidpal Oxle
(LEMq, the prcfJawi Corxlitianal Use Pemit far the t:tllmmrx:e if had faciliti15 as a anIitionally pemitud
use has lren sdxrlukd far ronsideration am appruud if the Planning Comnission.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2005-15
Page 3 of 3
NOW, 1HEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the Gty
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-15.
uA
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on November 15, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, LARIMER
FRANOA, GONZALES
NOES:
Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
;I JJ1t-
Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Secretary to the
Planning Commission
RESOLUfION NO. 2005-142
A RESOLUfION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE OTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-22
TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FLOOR
AREA RATIO AND THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
ON TWO SITES WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMEROAL (G1/SP) ZONING DISTRICT OF THE
CANYON CREEK "SUMMERHILL>> SPEOFIC PLAN.
WHEREAS, Sachin Trivedi, Shiva Management., has initiated proceedings to request the
approval of Qmditional Use Pennit No. 2005-22 to increase the maximum allowable floor area ratio
and building height on two sites within the Neighborhood Commercial (C1/SP) zoning district of
the Canyon Oeek "Summerhill" Specific Plan APNs 363-670-006,007 & 363-550-013,014.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Pennits; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on November 15,2005.
NOW 1HEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Conditional Use
Pennit 2005- 22 prior to approval. The Planning Commission finds and determines that this project
is consistent with the previously certified Environmental Impact Report for the Canyon Oeek
"Summerhill" Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 and that no further environmental review is
necessary pursuant to the California Environmental Quality ht (CEQA), Section 15162.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake
Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Conditional Use Pennit No. 2005-22 have been
made as follows:
1. The proposed floor area ratio and maximum building height increase on two separate sites, on
its own merits and within the context of the settings, is in accord with the objectives of the
General Plan, Canyon Oeek Specific Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the
site is located.
In order to adier.e a wil It:darmi ani finrtional rrix if n5idential, ~ inlustrial, open space,
m:reatianal ani institutionallani uses, staff has ~ly ewluat:l:rl the lani use rorrpatibility, mise, traffic ani
aher em.irrJJ1J11!t1ta! hazards reIaaxl to the ~<<i 0n1iti0nal Use Pemit far a f/mr area ratio anitrWCimIm
buildint, heifi;t in:rease on t7.w sites (APN's 363-670-006,007 & APN's 363-550-013,014) Wthin the
Neigiborhaxl 0Jn-mm:ial (ei/SF) zoning distria if the Canpn Crrek "SurmEYbill" Spocific Plan.
A ~y, the ~<<i f/mr area ratio ani building heifi;t in:rease are in an:urrefKJ:? Wth the dJjoctiw if the
Gerrral Plan, Canpn Crrek Spocific Plan ani the purfJae if the planning distria in 7ihUh the site is Ia:atal.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2005-22
Page 2 of 3
2. The proposed floor area ratio and maximwn building height increase on two separate sites will
not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing
or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the Gty, or injurious to property or
improvements in the neighborhood or the Gty.
In ao::ord Wth the ~(3 if the OJapter 17.74 (Onlitional Use Pemits) if the Lake Elsimre Municipal
<J:xk the City n>r:tliztd that the prcpatd Onlitional Use Perni1 far the jlror area ratio am buildirrg, heiin
irrrease on t'UD site (APN's 363-670-006,007 & APN's 363-550-013,014) Wthin the Neig,barIxxxl
Camrrrcial (C liSP) zanirrg distria if the Glrrpn CnPk "Swmrrhill" Sprojic Plan mty haw a paential to
n:gmwy irrpaa; the udfare if persons residing ar unrkirrg Wthin the mg,barIxxxl ar the Cit)t Considerirrg, this,
staff has substantiat<<l that all applicahle City Departnrnts am A~ haw hm, afforded the cpportunity far
a thoratgJ redewif the irrrease am haw irrorporatai all applicahle ronm!flts arxl/ ar rorrIitions.
2. The sites on which the increased floor area ratio and building height increase will occur are
adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed increases.
The prcpatd Onlitional Use Perni1 far a jlror area ratio am rruximtm buildirrg, heiin irrrease on t7ilJ sites
(APN's 363-670-006,007 & 363-550-013,014) Wthin the Neig,barIxxxl Camrrrcial (ClISP) zoning
distria if the Glrrpn CnPk "Swmrrhill" Sprojic Plan has hm, eudUt1tRd in ronsideratWn if the size am
shape if the property, thereby s~ am enharx:irrg the irrmxIiate ClJfm1!YCial area. Further, the irrreastd
jlror area ratio am buildirrg, heitx, as prcpaed, Wll rorrplerrmt the quality if existirg deuiqmrnt am Wll
cmtte a Usually pkusir1& mn-detraaiw rriationship beturen the prcpatd am existirrgprojocts.
3. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.74.50 of the LEMC have been
incorporated into the approval of the Qmditional Use Pemllt to insure that the increased floor
area ratio and building height will be compatible with surrounding land uses.
Pursuant to SfXtion 17.74.050 (Action if the Planning Comrriss~ if the Lake Elsimre Municipal 0xIe
(LEMq, the prcpatd Onlitional Use Perni1 far the jlror area ratio am buildirrg, heiin irrrease has hm,
sdx:rJukl far ronsideratWn am apprrmd if the Plannirrg Comrrission.
NOW, TIiEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the Gty
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Conditional Use Pemllt No. 2005-22.
Ron ere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on November 15 2005 by the following vote:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2005-22
Page 3 of 3
AYES:
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, LARIMER
NOES:
Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
FRANOA, GONZALES
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
/JJ1~
Rolfe M Preisendanz, Secretary to the
Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-143
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-06 FOR A
HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS HOTEL FACILITY LOCATED
AT 31573 CANYON ESTATES DRIVE WITHIN THE
CANYON CREEK "SUMMERHILL" SPECIFIC PLAN,
APN's 363-670-006,007.
WHEREAS, Sachin Trivedi, Shiva Management. has initiated proceedings for
Commercial Design Review No. 2005-06 for the construction of a Holiday Inn Express hotel
facility with related improvements located at 31573 Canyon Estates Drive, APN 363-670-
006,007; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for Design Reviews; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on November 15,
2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered Commercial Design Review
No. 2005-06 prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the
proposed Holiday Inn Express hotel facility. The Planning Commission finds and determines
that the project is consistent with the previously certified Environmental Impact Report for
Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 and that no further environmental
review is necessary pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section
15162.
\
\
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore, the following findings for the approval of Commercial Design Review No. 2005-
06 have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan,
Specific Plan and the Zoning District in which the project is located.
The proposed Commercial Design Review, located at 31573 Canyon Estates Drive, APN
363-670-006,007, complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and
Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan in that the approval of this commercial
project will assist in achieving the development of a well-balanced and functional mix of
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION
DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-06
Page 2 of 3
residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses
as well as encouraging industrial land uses to diversifY Lake Elsinore's economic base.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in the Canyon Creek Specific
Plan, Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of and the Municipal Code.
The proposed Commercial Design Review, located at 31573 Canyon Estates Drive,
APN's 363-670-006,007, is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that
the commercial project has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the
property, thereby creating interest and varying vistas as a person moves along the street.
Further the project as proposed will complement the quality of existing development and
will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and
existing projects in that the architectural design, color, materials and site design
proposed evidence a concern for quality and originality.
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to
result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed
Commercial Design Review located at Assessor Parcel Numbers 363-760-006,007, as
reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City Divisions and Departments and
Agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment pursuant to Section 15162;
(Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with
the objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed Commercial Design Review located at 31573
Canyon Estates Drive, APN 363-760-006,007, has been scheduled for consideration and
approval of the Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore approve Commercial Design Review No. 2005-06;
Ron~
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION
DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-06
Page 3 of 3
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on November 15,2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Conunissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, LARIMER
NOES:
Conunissioners:
ABSENT: Conunissioners:
FRANQA, GONZALES
ABSTAIN: Conunissioners:
ATTEST:
Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Secretary to the
Planning Commission
RESOLUfION NO. 2005-146
A RESOLUfION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
OTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
TO THE OTY COUNOL ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF
CONSISTENCY WITH THE MULTI-SPEOES HABITAT
CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN
AS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-07, AMENDMENT
NO. 8 TO THE EAST LAKE SPEOFIC PLAN NO. 93-3, AND
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 34017, LOCATED
SOUfH OF MISSION TRAIL, WEST OF CORYDON STREET,
NORTH OF COMO STREET AND EAST OF THE PROPOSED
JOHN LAING HOMES PROJECT, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NOS. 370-020-003; 370-030-004, -006, AND -012; 370-040-036
THRU -038; 370-0700-001, -002, -004 THRU -006, AND -010; 370-080-
009 AND -010.
WHEREAS, Lumos Communities LLC\ has submitted applications for General Plan
Amendment No. 2005-07, Amendment No.8 to ,he East Lake Specific Plan No. 93-3, and Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 34017, located south of Mission Trail, west of Corydon Street, north of
Como Street and east of the proposed John Lain Homes project, and known as Assessor's Parcel
Numbers 370-020-003; 370-030-004, -006, and -012; 370-040-036 thru -038; 370-0700-001, -002,
-004 thru -006, and -010; 370-080-009 and -010; and
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2005-07 and Amendment No. 8 to the East
Lake Specific Plan No. 93-3 together comprise the "project" as defined by Section 21065 of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), California Public Resources Code ~ 21000 et seq.,
which is defined as an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment,
or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and which includes the
issuance to a person of a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entidement for use by one or
more public agencies; and
WHEREAS, a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for Waterbury, srn
# 2005061033 has been prepared to evaluate environmental impacts resulting with the project; and
WHEREAS, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 34017 implements the project and is
therefore covered by Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for Waterbury, srn
# 2005061033; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said project has been given, and the Planning Commission has
considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested
parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on December 6, 2005;
NOW 1HEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2005-146
MSHCP CONSISTENCY FOR WATERBURY
PAGE TWO
MSHCP CONSISTENCY FINDINGS
1. The proposed project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City must
make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval.
The profJam prqfIt nquires a ~ if discretionary apprawls from the City am is subjfIt to CE Q4
redew Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Resdution, the prqfIt rrust be reriecmJ for MSHCP ronsisten:y,
ronsistent Wth the Prwrtian if Spe:ies Asscx:iattd Wth RiparianlRirerin! A n>as am Vemal Pcxl
Guiddins (MSHCP, ~ 6.1.2), Prwrtian if Narruw E rxIerric Plant Spe:ies Guiddins (MSHCP, ~
6.1.3), Additional Surrey Nads am Prcmlures (MSHCP, ~ 6.3.2), Urb:lnlWtldlarxls Inteifare
Guiddins (MSHCP, ~ 6.1.4), V~ Mappirrt, (MSHCP, ~ 6.3.1) nrpdrenrnts, Fuds
Manawrrnt Guiddins (MSHCP, ~ 6.4), am paytrent if the MSHCP Lro:d Der.dqmrnt Mitigttian
Fre (MSHCP Ordinarre, ~ 4).
2. The proposed project is subject to the City's LEAP and the County's Joint Project Review
processes.
As adirxxi in the LEAP Application dated AU[!#St 4, 2005 am subrritted by Varrlerrmt Consulting
Senia!s, Irx:. on Septerrber 1, 2005, portions if the site are la:aud Wthin MSHCP criteria arra ails
subjfIt to the City's if Lake Elsimre's AcquisitWnPrcms (LEAP). The profJam prqfIt irrplenrnts the
ail criteria in aaxmiarxE Wth the af!lWWll betueen the Oxmty if Rirerside am the resaerre a[pKies to
rmre aa:urately rrfl<<t bidcttJml resaeras in the Bade Basin MSHCP ronseru:aion Wthin the Bade Basin
if Lake E Isimre WlS mxlified to tad 770 acres ronprism if sereral open spare an>as, as aalirxxi in the
MSHCP rorrpliarxE letterpreparrri by Varrlerrmt Consulting Senia!s, Irx:. dated February 9,2005 am
attaIhed to the LEAP Application. The Oxmty if Ri'lEYSide rorIimnl that the 770 acres if ronseru:aion
prmides rorrpliarxE Wth MSHCP criteria arra ail ronseru:aion in a letter dated February 3, 2004, also
attaIhed to the LEAP Application. Therrf~ the PtrjfIt is rtt subjfIt to the City's LEAP or Oxmty's
J eint PrrjfIt Redewprrx15s for ronseru:aion Wthin the MSHCP criteria arra ails. HfJlJelEY, the PtrjfIt is
subjfIt to the City's LEAP am the Oxmty's Jeint PtrjfIt Redewprrx15s for irrpaas to arr Criteria A rra
Spe:ies, snmh tarplarrt, as adirxxi in 5. belaw
3. The proposed project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vemal Pools
Guidelines.
A~ to the LEAP ApplU:atian claud AU[!#St 4, 2005 am subnitt<</ by Varxiemnst Consulting,
Senia!s, Irx:. on Septerrber 1, 2005, m riparian, riwirr, 7EI'71Cll pcxJ/fairy shrirrp habitat or ci:her aquatic
resaeras ruere identijUd on the profJa<<i prqfIt site As a result, m.firrther MSHCP anal)5is or
ronseru:aion rrmsurES are nrpdmi. The profJa<<i prqfIt is ther(~ ronsistent Wth the RiparianlRi'CErire
A n>as am Vemal Pais Guiddins.
4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species
Guidelines.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2005-146
MSHCP CONSISTENCY FOR WATERBURY
PAGE THREE
A~ to the BidntJral TfXimict:d Report preparrd by GlennLukC6 aniAssa:iau5 anJuly 21, 2005
ani the LEAP ApplimtWnsubrrittai by Vardenrat 0Jnstiltirf, Senias, In:. anSepterrhr 1,2005, the
prq<<t is Wthin the Narrow E rxlenic Pldnt Sped15 Surrey A 1m No suitalie habitat or inii:dduals if
NarrowE rxlenic Pldnt Sped15 7iEre identiJi<<1on-site The Jrrr1Ja<<l prq<<t is therrfare ronsistent Wth the
Prrm:tion ifN arrawE rxlenic Pldnt Sped15 Guiddin:s.
5. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures.
A ~ to the BidntJral TfXimict:d Report preparrd by Glenn LukC6 am Assa:iau5 an July 21, 2005
am the LEAP ApplimtWnsubrrittai by Vardenrat OJnsulting Senias, In:. anSept:etrhr 1,2005, the
prq<<t is Wthin the BumJl1ing OW Surrey A n>a am Criteria A n>a Sped15 Surrey A 1m Suitalie habitat
far burrrming, au] WJS identiJi<<1 on- site, but no irrlirdduals or diaptic siWZ if burrrming, aWs 7iEre dJseruxi
durir7t5 the pede ~ sooon Thenfare the site WJS detemimi rx1: ammtly arupied by burrrming, mJ.
To assure burrrming, aWs Wll rx1: le inpadai by prq<<t deuloprrm, as a cxnlitian if prq<<t ~ a
pre-ronstructian surrey Wllle nrpdrrd Wthin 30 da)s prior to gr~ to rorfinn the aherXE if burrrming,
aWs, as nrpdrrd by the MSHCP.
ili criteria an>a sp8::if5, Srrrxxh tarpldnt (GntrumuIia fJU1'W1S ssp. !aeds), WJS identiJi<<1 on-site
A pprax im:ddy 8,000 to 10,000 srrrxxh tarpldnt 7iEre identiJi<<1 at the Prrj<<t Site, ar:uning in sereral
locations an site The Jrrr1Ja<<l prq<<t 'lDIid inpact all srrrxxh tarpldnt at the Prrj<<t Site The prq<<t
Jrrr1Jaes to nitigae far i1rpacts to the srrrxxh tarpldnt by aila:ting smi ftum on-site pcpu/ations am
enharring existingpcpu/ations ifsrrrxxh tarpldnt la:aud in habi1ats supporting lorlttermronsenJ1tion wlues
Wthin the Lake E Isimre Bade Basin The Jrrr1Ja<<l prq<<t Wll subrrit for reriewam apprucul by the City
a Detemination if B~ E quiwlent or Superior PresenJ1tion (DBE SP) arnl:)Sis prior to d:Jt:ainirf, a
gr~pemit for the prq<<t.
The prq<<t is rx1: Wthin a:rrphibian or mtrrmd Surrey A 1&5, therrfare habitat assessm?11tS arxl/ or fa:us<<l
stmE)S far these sped15 are rx1: nrpdml The Jrrr1Ja<<l prq<<t is therrfare ronsistent Wth the Additional
Surrey Netrls R<<JUirenrnts.
6. The proposed project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines.
M OOUYeS haw hm in:orparaud into the Jrrr1Ja<<l prq<<t so that there Wllle no prq<<t-rrIated drainag?,
tox<<s, li~ mise, inwsiw, lmriers, and grading/land deu/oprrrnt irrpaas to any OnerwtionA ratS.
The Jrrr1Ja<<l prq<<t is therrfare ronsistent Wth the U'rWrVWtldlarrls InterfrJiE Guiddin:s.
7. The proposed project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
The ~ if the entire prq<<t site has hm mtpp<<l in the BidntJral TfXimict:d Report prepared by Glenn
LukC6 and Assaiatts datal July 21, 2005. This mtpping is ronsistent uith MSHCP mtppirrg, pratxxxJ
and has hm prurik1 in digjtal forma to the City. The mtpping is sujJiaent un:Ier the MSHCP and is
ronsistent uith the MSHCP 'YfrjUirenwts.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2005-146
MSHCPCONSISTENCYFOR WATERBURY
PAGE FOUR
8. The proposed project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines.
The J>>r!Jaed ptrj<<t has bren desigmi to irxlude Iarxlscape buffers an the Ul5tem ~ if the decdqmrnt
lxunJary rmr the J>>r!Jaed MSHCP OJnseruttion Amt that Wll sene as Fud MalifratWn ZOfl3.
Wtthin these areas there Wll refire-resistant, mn-imosiw plarrts from the list aJrTtaiml Wthin the MSHCP
Ordinarre am m.ieooi by the City's Fire Departm!nt. A 0 fud 1ntnawrrnt areas WlllXist adside if the
MSHCP OJnseruttion A mt. The J>>r!Jaed ptrj<<t is thenfare ronsistent Wth the Fuels Manawrrnt
Guiddirxs.
9. The proposed project will be conditioned to pay the Gty's MSHCP Local Development
Mitigation Fee.
As a anIition if apprawJ, the ptrj<<t Wll re mptired to pay the City's MSHCP Lrxal Deukprmrt
M itigttian F re at the tinr if issuarre if buildmt5 pemits. The ament fee far residentid decdqmrnt Wth a
density if ~s than 8.0 duelling units per acre is $1,651 per duelling unit. This is ronsistent Wth the
MSHCP M itigttian F re mptirem!J1t.
10. The proposed project overall is consistent with the MSHCP.
The J>>r!Jaed ptrj<<t rorrplies am is ronsistent Wth aU if the mptired praHlurr5, paU:ies, am gpiddirxs if
the City's MSHCP Rt5dutian am the MSHCP.
11. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the agency, that the
project as revised may have significant effect on the environment.
NOW, TI-IEREFORE, pursuant to the above f dings, the Planning Commission of the
Gty of Lake Elsinore, California, DOES HEREBY RE ND that the Gty Council that the
Gtyof Lake Elsinore adopt the Findings of Consistenc ~ ~
Ron LaPere, 01airman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2005-146
MSHCPCONSISTENCYFOR WATERBURY
PAGE FIVE
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on December 6, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL
GONZALES, LARIMER
FRANOA
NOES:
Commissioners:
ABSENT:
Commissioners:
ABSTAIN:
Commissioners:
ATIEST:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-147
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE OTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE OTY COUNOL OF THE
OTY OF LAKE ELSINORE CERTIFICATION OF THE
FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACf
REPORT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-
07 AND AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO THE EAST LAKE
SPEOFIC PLAN NO. 93-3 (SCH# 2005061033).
WHEREAS, Lumos Communities has submitted applications for General Plan Amendment
No. 2005-07 and Amendment No.8 to the East Lake Specific Plan No. 93-3. The project consists
of the development of 396.4 + acres into 1,796 single family residential lots, a five-acre lake,
neighborhood parks, a recreational center, and approximately 194.1 acres of natural open space. The
project site is located on the southeaster edge of the East Lake Specific Plan, south of Mission Trail,
west of Corydon Street, north of Como Street, and east of the proposed John Laing Homes project;
and
WHEREAS, these applications together comprise the "project" as defined by Section 21065
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Cal. Public Resources Code ~ 21000 et seq. A
project is defined as an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment,
or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and which includes the
issuance to a person of a lease, pennit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or
more public agencies; and
WHEREAS, the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the project has been
prepared to evaluate environmental impacts resulting with the project; and
WHEREAS, Section 21081.6 of CEQA requires that where an EIR has been prepared for a
project for which mitigation measures are adopted, that a mitigation monitoring or reporting
program be adopted for said project, and pursuant to Section 21081.6 of CEQA, the Gty has
prepared and updated a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of making recommendations to the Gty Council for certifying Supplemental
Environmental Impact Reports; and
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-147
CERTIFICATION OF THE FSEIR FOR WATERBURY
DECEMBER 6, 2005
PAGE NO.2 of 5
WHEREAS, public notice of said applications has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and
other interested parties at public hearings held with respect to this item on December 6, 2005; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, preparation
of the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the project was selected as the most
appropriate document for compliance with CEQA, utilizing criteria set forth therein;
NOW 1HEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the Oty of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
FINDINGS OF FAct AND OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION
1. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the Final Supplemental EIR for
Amendment No.8 to the East Lake Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment No. 2005-07
and finds that it is complete, adequate in its evaluation of all environmental effects of the
proposal, contains all required infonnation, and has been completed in compliance with CEQA
and the Oty's CEQA requirements.
2. Amendment No.8 to the East Lake Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment No. 2005-07
will result in significant unavoidable air quality impacts regardless of mitigation measures. A
Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared in accordance with Section 15093 of
the CEQA Guidelines. The Statement of Overriding Considerations "balances" the proposed
project against its unavoidable environmental effects.
3. The Supplemental EIR, which was prepared in accordance with Section 15163 of the State
CEQA Guidelines, includes the Draft SEIR, Response to Comments document, Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program, Findings of Fact, and Statement of Overriding
Considerations.
4. The Supplemental EIR identified several significant environmental effects resulting from
implementation of the project. Some of these significant effects can be fully avoided/mitigated
through the adoption of feasible mitigation measures. To the extent that these findings conclude
that various proposed mitigation measures outlined in the Final SEIR are feasible and have not
RESOLUtION NO. 2005-147
CERTIFICATION OF THE FSEIR FOR WATERBURY
DECEMBER 6, 2005
PAGE NO.3 of5
been modified, superseded, or withdrawn, the Gty hereby binds itself to implement these
measures. These findings are not merely infonnational, but rather constitute a binding set of
obligations that will come into effect when the Gty Council fonnalIyapproves the project.
5. The mitigation measures and! or the standard design features and construction measures are
referenced in the Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
adopted concurrently with these Findings, and will be implemented through the final design,
construction and post-construction periods.
6. One environmental effect cannot be reduced to less than significant levels by the adoption of
feasible mitigation measures or feasible environmentally superior alternatives. Short and long-
term impacts to air quality has been identified as unavoidable and significant. The project has the
potential to adversely affect humans, either directly or indirectly.
7. The Planning Commission considered the infonnation contained in the FSEIR prior to
recommending to the Gty Council certification of the FSEIR; and the FSEIR reflects the
Planning Commission's independent judgment and analysis. In recommending approval, the
Planning Commission has weighed the benefits of the project against the significant adverse
impacts identified in the FSEIR that have not been avoided or lessened through mitigation to a
level of less than significant. The Planning Commission hereby determines that benefits of the
project outweigh the unmitigated adverse impacts and that the project should be approved.
8. The Planning Commission finds that to the extent that the identified significant or potentially
significant adverse impact has not been avoided or substantially lessened, there are specific
economic, legal, social, technological and other considerations which support approval of the
project. The project would provide the following benefits which offset the identified significant
short and long-term air quality impacts:
a. Social
(1)
(2)
(3)
To facilitate the orderly and timely completion of the East Lake Specific Plan.
To provide housing for the Gty of Lake Elsinore's growing population consistent
with the Gty's General Plan.
To provide a range of housing alternatives.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-147
CERTIFICATION OF THE FSEIR FOR WATERBURY
DECEMBER 6, 2005
PAGE NO.4 of 5
( 4) To provide a variety of recreation opportunities in the Back Basin.
(5) To provide neighborhood park space.
(6) To provide adequate flood storage.
b. Economic
(1)
Construction of the project will generate its fair share of property tax revenues to the
Gty of Lake Elsinore annually. Construction of the project will also generate utility
user tax revenues to the Gty and County.
The project will be built out by early 2011, providing steady construction jobs over
the construction period.
The project will contribute fees toward traffic improvements, school facilities, park
facilities, fire services, police services, water facilities and sewer facilities.
The project applicant will either provide affordable housing or contribute a fee in
lieu of providing 15% of the units as affordable housing in accordance with Section
33413 (b) (2) of the California Community Redevelopment Law.
(2)
(3)
(4)
NOW, TI-IEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the Gty
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECDMMEND that the Gty Council of the Gty of Lake
Elsinore certify the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for Amendment No. 8 to the
East Lake Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment No. 2005-07, Exhibits B, C and D, is
complete, adequate, and fully complies with the requirements of CEQA, the State CEQA
Guidelines, and the Gty's environmental analysis procedures.
RESOLUTION NO. 200S-147
CERTIFICATION OF THE FSEIR FOR WATERBURY
DECEMBER 6, 200S
PAGE NO. S ofs
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Conunission at a meeting
thereof conducted on December 6,2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Conunissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL
GONZALES, LARIMER
FRANOA
NOES: Conunissioners:
ABSENT: Conunissioners:
ABSTAIN: Conunissioners:
ATTEST:
~
Rolfe M Preisendanz, Secretary to the
Planning Conunission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-148
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-07, CHANGING THE
GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT
ALIGNMENT OF BUNDY CANYON ROAD AND THE
CLASSIFICATION OF BUNDY CANYON ROAD, FROM
"URBAN ARTERIAL" TO "MODIFIED MAJOR"
THROUGH THE EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT #8 AREA.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by
Lumos Communities LLC to change the General Plan Circulation Element alignment of
Bundy Canyon Road, and the roadway classification of Bundy Canyon Road from
"Urban Arterial" to "Modified Major (4-lanes, 112' Right of Way)," at its extension of
Diamond Drive in the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment #6 and easterly to the existing
Bundy Canyon Road at Mission Trail; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council
pertaining to proposed amendments; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item
on December 6,2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed General
Plan Amendment, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council
approve the proposal to change the General Plan Circulation Element alignment and
roadway classification for Bundy Canyon Road from "Urban Arterial" to "Modified
Major (4-lanes, 112' R.O.W.). Pursuant to Section 21080(c)(2) of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning Commission finds and determines that
the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for Waterbury (SCH #2005061033) is
adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA which analyzes
environmental effects of the proposed project.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 148
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-07
DECEMBER 6, 2005
PAGE 2 OF 3
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the
City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of General
Plan Amendment No. 2005-07 have been made as follows:
1. The proposed amendment will not be (1) detrimental to the health, safety,
comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the
neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, (2) injurious to
property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City.
a. The design of Bundy Canyon Road is based upon the Traffic Impact
Analysis prepared for the Waterbury project by Urban Crossroads dated
July 25, 2005. The study analyzed several alternative alignments.
b. The design of Bundy Canyon Road is based upon meetings and
discussions between the City and the Riverside County Transportation
Department.
c. Weighing the relative merits of the alternative alignments, the alignment
shown as Alternative 5 on Exhibit 6-1 in the traffic study is considered the
preferred alignment, with such further technical adjustments as may be
made by staff.
2. The proposed amendment will be consistent with the latest General Plan.
a. Development approvals in the East Lake Specific Plan have reduced the
overall density in the Plan. The reduction of vehicle trips can be
accommodated by the proposed Bundy Canyon Road.
b. Development in the vicinity of this project have been affected by the
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Program (MSHCP). The proposed
Bundy Canyon Road alignment accommodates this effort towards
conservation.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 148
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-07
DECEMBER 6, 2005
PAGE 3 OF 3
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of
the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOM that t e City Council of the
City of Lake Elsinore approve General Plan Amendme t No. 00 -0 .
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission
at a meeting thereof conducted on December 6, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL
NOES: Commissioners:
GONZALES, LARIMER
ABSENT: Commissioners:
FRANCIA
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Secretary to the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-149
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO.8
TO THE EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 93-3, LOCATED
SOUTH OF MISSION TRAIL, WEST OF CORYDON
STREET, NORTH OF COMO STREET AND EAST OF THE
PROPOSED JOHN LAING HOMES PROJECT, AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 370-020-003; 370-
030-004, -006, AND -012; 370-040-036 THRU -038; 370-0700-
001, -002, -004 THRU -006, AND -010; 370-080-009 AND -010.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by
Lumos Communities LLC to amend the East Lake Specific Plan No. 93-3; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council
pertaining to changes to approved specific plans; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item
on December 6,2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed
Amendment No.8 to the East Lake Specific Plan No. 93-3 prior to making a decision to
recommend that the City Council approve the proposed amendment. Pursuant to Section
21080 (c)(2) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning
Commission finds and determines that the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report
for Waterbury (SCH #2005061033) is adequate and prepared in accordance with the
requirements ofCEQA which analyzes environmental effects of the proposed project.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and
Chapter 17.99 (Specific Plan District) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code the following
findings for the approval of Amendment No. 8 to the East Lake Specific Plan No. 93-3
have been made as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-149
AMD NO.8 TO EAST LAKE SP 93-3
DECEMBER 6, 2005
PAGE 20F4
1. The location and design of the proposed development is consistent with the goals
and policies of the City's General Plan and with any other applicable plan or
policies adopted by the City, or in the process of being prepared and adopted.
a. The General Plan supports the development of the East Lake Specific Plan.
The proposed Amendment has been reviewed and conditioned to enhance
and update the original Specific Plan.
b. The proposal has been designed to support the objectives of the Multi-
Species Habitat Conservation Plan adopted by the City, by preserving habitat
areas identified in the Conservation Plan.
c. The proposal has been designed to support the objectives of the Lake
Management Plan by increasing open space acreage to accommodate the
requirements for flood storage at the Lake.
2. The proposed location allows the development to be well-integrated with or
adequately buffered from its surroundings, whichever may be the case.
a. The proposed Amendment integrates development of Phase 2 of the Specific
Plan with the approved John Laing Homes project directly adjacent to the
west. SP A#8 extends Diamond Drive, a vital roadway in the Plan, to a logical
connection with the existing Bundy Canyon Road, and ultimately to
Interstate 15, thereby providing a viable east/west link from the Back Basin
to the freeway.
b. The proposed Amendment provides a variety of housing types that transition
higher density residential products towards its easterly edge adjacent to
general commercial designations at the intersection of Mission Trail and
Corydon Street. A large expanse of open space buffers both the land uses to
the south and those along Corydon Street to the east. This open space area is
proposed for recreational uses compatible with existing and proposed
aeronautical and industrial uses adjacent to the site.
3. All vehicular traffic generated by the development, either in phased increments or
at full build-out, is to be accommodated safely and without causing undue
congestion upon adjoining streets.
a. A Traffic Phasing Analysis was prepared for this project by Urban
Crossroads dated July 25, 2005, and the project has been conditioned to
implement the recommendations set forth in the Analysis.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-149
AMD NO.8 TO EAST LAKE SP 93-3
DECEMBER 6, 2005
PAGE 30F4
b. Furthermore, the City's Traffic Engineer has required that additional
circulation measures be imposed upon the project.
4. The Final Specific Plan shall identify a methodology to allow land uses to be
adequately serviced by existing or proposed public facilities and services.
a. The proposed Amendment has been reviewed and conditioned to provide
adequate public services to the site.
b. The proposed Amendment provides a recreation center, a five-acre lake,
neighborhood parks, pedestrian pathways, bike lanes and open space for its
residents.
5. The overall design of the Specific Plan Amendment shall produce an attractive,
efficient and stable development.
a. The proposed Amendment will allow the construction of compatible
residential units in a design that promotes neighborhood identity. Design
Guidelines have been included to establish a consistent design expression
among site planning, architectural and landscaping components while
allowing reasonable flexibility in design.
b. The proposed Amendment will provide recreational amenities and natural
open space for its residents, promoting an environmentally sensitive open
space/recreationally oriented community as envisioned in the East Lake
Specific Plan.
6. In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), impacts have been reduced to a level of non-significance or in the case
where impacts remain, a Statement of Overriding Considerations is recommended
for adoption to justify the merits of project implementation.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-149
AMD NO.8 TO EAST LAKE SP 93-3
DECEMBER 6, 2005
PAGE 40F4
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of
the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the
City of Lake Elsinore approve Amendment No.8 to the East Lake Specific Plan No. 93-
3, subject to Conditions of Approval, based upon E~'
Ron LaPere, Ch~
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at
a meeting thereof conducted on December 6, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL
NOES: Commissioners:
GONZALES, LARIMER
ABSENT: Commissioners:
FRANCIA
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
olfe M. Preisendanz, Secretary to the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-150
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF VESTING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 34017, A SUBDIVISION OF
611 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS, FOUR LOTS
FOR R-3 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, A
RECREATION CENTER, AND SIX OPEN SPACE LOTS, ON
APPROXIMATELY 396.4:t ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF
MISSION TRAIL, WEST OF CORYDON STREET, NORTH
OF COMO STREET AND EAST OF THE PROPOSED JOHN
LAING HOMES PROJECT, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NOS. 370-020-003; 370-030-004, -006, AND -012;
370-040-036 THRU -038; 370-0700-001, -002, -004 THRU -006,
AND -010; 370-080-009 AND -010.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by
Lumos Communities LLC to subdivide approximately 396.4i: acres of unimproved
property into 611 residential lots, four lots for R-3 development, a recreation center, and
six open space lots; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been
delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council
pertaining to the subdivision of land; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item
on December 6,2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed general
plan amendment, specific plan amendment and subdivision, prior to making a decision to
recommend that the City Council approve the proposal to subdivide approximately
396.4i: acres into 611 residential lots, four lots for R-3 residential development a
recreation center, and six open space lots. Pursuant to Section 21080 (c )(2) of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning Commission finds and
determines that the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SCH2005061033) is
adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA which analyzes
environmental effects of the proposed East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.8. The
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 150
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 34017
DECEMBER 6, 2005
PAGE 20F4
Planning Commission further finds that Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 34017 is
consistent with and implements the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.8, and
therefore, no additional environmental review is necessary for the approval of the map.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State of California Subdivision Map Act,
and the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 34017 have been made as follows:
1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and
improvements, is consistent with the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. The
proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses
and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5).
a. The design of the proposed subdivision and density are consistent with
proposed Amendment No.8 to the East Lake Specific Plan No. 93-3, and
therefore with the General Plan.
b. The project proposes single family residential lots ranging in size from
4,000 square feet to 15,168 square feet, with average lot sizes ranging
from 4,770 to 7,214 square feet in various neighborhoods. The project
represents a reduction in the amount of residential units from the
originally approved Specific Plan by 459 units.
2. The site of the proposed division of land is physically suitable for the proposed
density of development in accordance with the General Plan.
a. The General Plan encourages clustered development in order to facilitate
the conservation of identified wildlife corridors and habitat. The project
density and design is compatible with recently approved development
adjacent to its westerly boundary.
b. The map provides open space areas that protect the natural topography,
habitat, lake management and views.
3. The effects that this project are likely to have upon the housing needs of the
region, the public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and
environmental resources have been considered and balanced.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 150
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 34017
DECEMBER 6, 2005
PAGE 30F4
a. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan. During the approval
of City's General Plan, housing needs, public services and fiscal resources
were scrutinized to achieve a balance within the City.
b. The map has been conditioned to annex into Community Facilities District
2003-01 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on
public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City.
c. The map has been conditioned to annex into Lighting and Landscape
Maintenance District No.1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of
the project on public right-of-way landscaped areas to be maintained by
the City, and for street lights in the public right-of-way for which the City
will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California
Edison.
d. The map has been conditioned to form a Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District to fund the on-going operationi and maintenance of the
new parks, parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed
within the development, and federal NPDES requirements, to offset the
annual negative fiscal impacts of the project.
4. The design of the proposed division of land or type of improvements are not likely
to cause serious public health problems.
a. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 34017 is conditioned to comply with all
development standards of proposed Amendment No. 8 to the East Lake
Specific Plan. These standards have been prepared and reviewed to benefit
the public health, safety and welfare.
5. The design of the proposed division ofland or the type of improvements will not
conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use
of property within the proposed division of land.
a. All known easements or requests for access have been incorporated into
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 34017.
b. The map has been circulated to City departments and outside agencies,
and appropriate conditions of approval have been applied for their
approval during construction.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 150
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 34017
DECEMBER 6, 2005
PAGE 40F4
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of
the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the
City of Lake Elsinore approve Vesting Tentativ ract Map No. 34017 subject to
Conditions of Approval.
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission
at a meeting thereof conducted on December 6, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: FRANCIA
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
t~
Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Secretary to the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-151
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2005-06
WHEREAS, Lake Elsinore Ford, has submitted an application for Commercial Design
Review No. 2005-02, Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-06, and Variance No. 2005-03. The ten
(10) acre site is located at the southwest corner of Auto Center Drive and Avenue 12; and
WHEREAS, Lake Elsinore Ford is defined as a "project" by Section 21065 of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Cal. Public Resources Code Section 21000 et
seq., which is defined as an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the
environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and which
includes the issuance to a person of a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for
use by one or more public agencies; and
WHEREAS, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-06 has been prepared to evaluate
environmental impacts resulting with the project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for approving Mitigated
Negative Declaration No. 2005-06; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said applications has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on December 6,
2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration No. 2005-06, prior to making a decision to recommend approval to the
City Council. The Planning Commission finds and determines that Mitigated Negative
Declaration No. 2005-06 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effects of the
project, based upon the following findings and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of
Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No.
2005-06 have been made as follows:
1. Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before a
proposed mitigated negative declaration and initial study are released for public review
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DEa..ARATION NO. 2005-06
Page 2 of2
would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects
would occur.
The applicant has made revisions to the project or has agreed to specific conditions which
would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects of the project to a point where no significant
effects would occur.
2. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the agency, that the
project as revised may have significant effect on the environment.
Pursuant to the evidence received in the light of the whole record presented to staff the
project will not have a significant effect on the environment considering the applicable
Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring Program.
3. Mitigation measures have been required to ensure all potentially significant impacts are
reduced to levels of insignificance.
Mitigation measures have been required which will reduce significant environmental impacts
to the level of insignificance.
Elsinore approve Mitigated Negative Declaration
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above fi
Ron aP e, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on December 6, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Secretary to the
Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-152
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH
SECTION 6.1.2 OF THE MULTIPLE SPECIES
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) FOR THE
PROJECT IDENTIFIED AS LAKE ELSINORE FORD
WHEREAS, consistency with the MSHCP is required and a site specific focused survey
for Narrow Endemic Plant Species is required by Section 6.1.2 of the Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSCHP) for the purpose of a new automobile dealership identified as Lake
Elsinore Ford; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore evaluated the consistency of the project with the
(MSHCP); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendation to the City Council adopting the Findings of
Consistency with the MSHCP; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered and approved the request by staff on December 6, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE as follows:
A Habitat Assessment prepared by Tom Dodson & Associates has been prepared,
submitted and reviewed in accordance with requirements of the Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The report is complete and adequate in its evaluation of all
environmental effects of the project identified as Lake Elsinore Ford and will not
preclude the implementation of the MSHCP goals, based on the following finding;
1. The proposed project is a project under the Oty's MSHa Resolution that must make an
MSHa Gmsistency finding before approval.
Pursuant to the Ci1:y's MSHCP Rtsdutinn, brause the prrpaed projro: nYJUires a rrunirer if diso-etionary
apprauds from the City am is subjro: to CE QA rerieuJ it mISt be reriew:d for MSHCP wnsisterx:y, 7RhUh
entails far the prrpaed projro: deternining 7Rhether it is subjro: to the City's LEAP prcms, wnsistent Wth the
Prr1:8:tian if Spocil5 Associata;/ Wth Riparian/Ri'lErirx? A 1RtS am vernal Pal Guiddin:s (MSHCP, ~
6.1.2), Guiddin:s Perta~ to Urb:zn/WzIdlam Inteifare (MSHCP, ~ 6.1.4), Additional Surrey NmIs
am p'f'CXlfiures (MSHCP, ~ 6.3.2), Urb:zn/WzIdlarxis Inteifare Guiddin:s (MSHCP, ~ 6.3.2), V ~
Mapping (MSHCP, ~ 6.3.1) nYJUirenrnts, Fuds Managmrnt Guiddin3 (MSHCP, ~ 6.4), am fXo/I1Wt if
the MSHCP Lro:dIJeu:JqmmMitigaionFre(MSHCP Ordinarre, ~ 4}.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
MSHCP CONSISTENCY OF LAKE ELSINORE FORD
Page 2 of 3
2. The proposed project is subject to the Joint Project Review process.
A cwrdirTg, to the Multi-Sptrits Hahitat Conseruaion Pl4n (MSHCP), the frxxprint if the prcjoct site is la:aud
Wthin the E Isimre A rat PI4n. This A rat PI4n, the Cmnty's Rap Wwite (sre
http://'OOXRJrcip.arg/rmps.htrr;, am the (MSHCP) Conseruaion Sumntry Report GeJrratar Sheet for the
arat showthat the fTt'CPaed prcjoct is la:aud Wthin Subunit 5, P~ed em 1 am ronprisl5 a portion if Cell
Gratps A', B' am Z' if the Elsimre A rat Pl4n am is subjoct to the City's LEAP prcms. The fTt'CPaed
prcjoct is la:aud Wthin CeIJs 4646 am 4743 if the MSHCP. Conseruaion Wthin the Cell Gratps W1l fOOlS
an the San Jacinto Riter jlaxJplain. A s a re;ult, the fTt'CPaed prcjoct has been subjoct to the] cint Prqoct Redew
prcms.
3. The proposed project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools
Guidelines.
The prcjoct has been retieuai am asSl5sed am it has been detemiml that the prcjoct site da5 haw Riparian am
Ri'tEYirl? habitat. There are m wnal pals an the site T 7Jl) zmnarral charrnis traW'Se the prcjoct site Or is
an ~ internittent charni, am da5 rKt represent the type if charrnis identiJi<<i in the Riparian Ri'tEYirl?
am Vemal Pais Pdicy. The swnl charni, la:aud an the satthem portion if the paral is charaa:erized by
rru/ifat scrub. If m ronstruaion is fTt'CPaed in the aaJe, m jUrther sun.E)5 or ronseruaion 1'1'FaSures W1l m
raquiml. If the prcjoct fTt'CPal5 arry actions that W1l a./foct this charni, the applirarrt W1l m raquired to proride
bidatJmlly superior or <<JUiwlent rritig;ttim. to cffset the inpacts to Riparian!Ri'lEJ'el'r re;aera5 an site
4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species
Guidelines.
The sun.ey arat mtps haw been retieuai am asSl5sffi, am the fTt'CPaed prcjoct is rKt Wthin a mtpped sun.ey
arat far Narrow E rrIenia Pl4rrt Sptrits. The fTt'CPaed prcjoct has been detenriml to m ronsistent Wth the
Prrmtion ifN arrowE rrlerric Pl4rrt Sptrits Guidelins.
5. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures.
A hctJJi1l1t asSl5snm am burro sun.ey 7JPS cxnlut:mi an the site The site has been grakJ, am is prrrlorrinantly
dRar if 7J!i!!fation. During the Sun.E)5 cxnlut:mi inMardJ 2005, a 100 perrent cmera~ w:dk (J(EY' this parrel
7JPS the suney. The re;ult if this sun.ey 7JPS chronic am onging disturh:trm these tracts rmke them unsuitaJie
for burraWng auls. Therrfare, m jUrther studies uere Wl1ranud The prcjoct is therrfore ronsistent Wth the
Additional Sun.ey N eals R<<jUirenrnts.
6. The proposed project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines.
Measures haw been irwrparat<<l into the fTt'CPaed prcjoct so that there W1l m m prrjoct-rfiaud drainafF taxies,
li~ mise, inwsiw, mrriets, am grading/14m der.eWprrrnt inpacts to the Conseruuion A?at. The
fTt'CPaed prcjoct is therrfore ronsistent Wth the Urktn!Wddlarxls Interface Guidelins.
7. The proposed project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
The 7J!i!!fation. if the entire prcjoct site has been mtpped This ~ is sufJU:ient urrler the MSHCP am is
ronsistent Wth the MSHCP.
8. The proposed project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
MSHCP CONSISTENCY OF LAKE ELSINORE FORD
Page 3 of 3
The propa<<i prrj<<t Wll k desigrxxl to inlude Iarxlscape buffers rrar the propa<<i MSHCP OnerllltionA mt
that Wll in esSerrE aft as Fuel MaJification Z0J'X5. Wzthin these amtS there Wll k fire-resistant, rm-inwsi'U!
plarrts. Aa:ordirfiy, Wth these rrFi1SUYeS, the propa<<i prrj<<t is thenfare ronsistent Wth the Fuds Manawrmt
Guiddins.
9. The proposed project will be conditioned to pay the Otis MSHCP Local Development
Mitigation Fee.
As a aniition if appruwl, the prrj<<t Wll k nYJUimi to pay the City's MSHCP Lwl IJeukprrrnt Miti~
F re at the tinr if issua1'l.l! if building, pemits.
10. The proposed project overall is consistent with the MSHCP.
The propa<<i prrj<<t cmpliRs am is ronsistent Wth all if the nYJUimi pnmlurr5, pdiciRs, am g;ddelins if the
City's MSHCP Resdution am the MSHCP. The applicant has mule recisions to the prr!<<t ar has agrm/ to
specific anlitions, uhUh w:uld awid the ifJu:ts ar nitig,tte the ifJu:ts if the prrj<<t to a JXirrt 7ihere m sig(lijimnt
ifJu:ts w:uld arur.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND the City Council of the City of Lake
Elsinore adopt the Findings of Consistency Section .1.2 0 the MS
Ron LaPere, ChaIrman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on December 6, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES:
Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
FRANCIA
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
~
Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Secretary to the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-153
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-02 FOR THE
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF
THE "LAKE ELSINORE FORD" AUTOMOBILE
DEALERSHIP, TO BE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF AUTO CENTER DRIVE AND AVENUE 12
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Frank
Johnson, The Automotive Group, to request the approval of Commercial Design Review No.
2005-02 for the design, construction and establishment of the new "Lake Elsinore Ford"
automobile dealership; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of recommending approval of Design Reviews for commercial projects;
and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on December 6,
2005.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for
Commercial Design Review No. 2005-02 and has found it acceptable. The Planning
Commission finds and determines that this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code and determines that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-06 is adequate and prepared
in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which
analyzes environmental effects, based upon the following findings and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings for the project have been made as follows:
FINDINGS - DESIGN REVIEW
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The prrpa<<i 0Jmrrrdal Design Rer.iew kraud at the saa:lmtst rorJ'X!r if A uta Center Driw am A 'l.f!J1Ue 12
ronplils Wth the gds am obj<<:ti7PS if the GeJrral Plan, in that the appruw1 if this autarrrhile dRdership Wll
assist in achierirrt, the decdqmwt if a udl-WlarxJ:r:i am funtional rrix if residential, wnm;rr:ial, irxIustrial,
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-02
Page 2 of 3
open spat:e, ru:reational am institutional lam 16(5 as 7iil1 as erxmragjng rorrm:rr:iallam 16(5 to di'lEYSify Lake
E lsimre's ~ mse
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The prcpam Corrm!rr:id D3igp Reciew loomd at tk scutJmest wrrx;r if A uto Center Dme am A 'lEI'lJ.{e 12 is
apprq>>iate to tk site am surroo:rxlirg deukprrmts in that tk autamii1e dedership prqoct has ~ dt3igrRl in
ronsideration if tk size am shape if tk property, therrhy creati.rr6 inten3t arrl wryirrg 'listas as a person rrmes
almg tk strret. Fwther tk prqoct as prcpam Wll cwplerrmt tk quality if e<:istirTg deuiqmrnt am Wll
create a 'lisually pleas~ mn-detraaiw rrlationship beturen tk prcpam am e<:istirTg prqros in that tk
ardJiJ:<<ttgaJ dt3i[!f1, aiar am mtterials am site dt3igp prcpam eri.derKE a a:n:em for quality am origin11ity,
ronsistent Wth e<:istirTg autamii1e dederships in tk imnxliate area..
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuant to tk California EncirrJrlJ11!J1ta1 QIality Act (CEQ4), tk prcpam Corrm!rr:id Design Reciew
loomd at tk scutJmest wrrx;r if A uto Center Driw am A 'lEI'lJ.{e 12 as rer.iermi am rorrlitiami by aIJ
applicalie city Di'lisians am DeparttmltS am Awcis, Wll n:t haw a sigpifirant ifJoct on tk emiranl1l?f1t
pursuant to attached Carr1itions if A pprawJ.
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuant to Soction 17.82.070 (Action if tk Plannirg OJmniss~ if tk Lake Elsimre Munifipal GxIe
(LEMq, tk prcpam Corrm!rr:id D(5ignReciewloomd at tk scutJmest wrrx;r if Auto Center Dme am
A'lEI'lJ.{e 12 has ~ schedulai far ronsideration am apprmul if tk Planning OJmnissWn.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROV AL of
Commercial Design Review No. C 2005-02.
Ron aPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-02
Page 3 of 3
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on December 6, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES:
Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
FRANCIA
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
~
Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Secretary to the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-154
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-06
FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE "LAKE ELSINORE
FORD" AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP TO BE LOCATED
AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AUTO CENTER
DRIVE AND AVENUE 12.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Frank
Johnson, The Automotive Group, to request the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-
06, for the establishment of "Lake Elsinore Ford" automobile dealership; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Permits for commercial projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on December 6,
2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for a
Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-06 and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission
finds and determines that this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and
determines that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-06 is adequate and prepared in
accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which
analyzes environmental effects of ends City Council certification, based on the following
findings and determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake
Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings for the have been made as follows:
1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord with the
objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is
located.
In order to adJiere a uell kdarmi am.fim:tiarnl rrix if residential, ~ irxlustrial, q;en space,
m:reatianal am institutional lam uses, staff has t:hmmgJly eu:duatai the lam use wnpatihility, mise, traffic am
a:her emiranm.?J1l:ttl hazards niated to the fJr'C1Jatd 0:nlitWnal Use Pemit far an automlile dmlership lromd
at the saltlmest crJm?r if A uta Center Dri:re am A W1Ue 12. A cwrr1in{iy, the fJr'C1Jatd lam use is in
wrx:urrm:e W1:h the dJje::ti'U'S if the Gelrral Plan am the purfJae if the plarrrTirf, distria in Wich the site is
la:aud
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-06
Page 2 of 3
2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general
welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the Gty,
or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the Gty.
In cuwrd Wth the ~es if the OJapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Pennits) if the Lake Elsimre
Municipal 0xU; the City rea1izm that the prcfJam autorrd:Jile dealership la:atai at the sanlm.tst aJrrl!r if
A uto Center Driw ani A W1Ue 12 mry haw a pa:ential to ~ti!u:ly inpact the wfare if persons residirrt. or
WYtking Wthin the rxi~barfxxx1 or the City. OJnsidering this, staff has substantiaud that all applU:al:ie City
Departrrmts ani A wOO haw lxen ajfardRd the cpportunity for a ~ redew if the use ani haw
irwrporat<<i all applU:al:ie a:>>rm!YTlS arxl/ or anlitions relatai to instdlation ani mdntenarre if IarrlsC11fJin&
strfft daiications, reg;Jations if pci:rrts if uJiaJar ingress ani tgresS ani wntrd if pa:ential nuisarm, so as to
dirrinate arTj n:g:ttiw irrpacts to the wrral health, safety, ronfart, or wrral wfare if the surrrurrling
rxi~barfxxx1 or the City.
3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to acconunodate the use, and for all
the setbacks, walls, landscaping, buffers and other features required by Tide 17 of the LEMC
The prcfJam autorrd:Jile dealership use la:atai at the sanlm.tst aJrrl!r if A uto Center Driw ani A W1Ue 12 has
lxen desi[7Hi in ronsideration if the size ani shape if the property, therWy s~ ani enharring the
irrmrliate wrral CIJI'm1!Yridl arra. Further, the prcjoct as prcfJaffi, Wl1 ronplerrmt the quality if tXisting
deu:loprrent ani Wl1 create a rrisually pleasin& mmJetraaiw relationship ~ the prcfJam ani tXisting
prcj<<ts, in that the autorrd:Jile dealership has lxen redeood to ensure ad<<juate prmision if s~ from the
publit: rip-cfuay or adjarent propertU5.
4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width
and type of pavement to carty the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use.
The prcfJam autorrd:Jile dealership la:atai at the sanlm.tst aJrrl!r if A uto Center Driw ani A W1Ue 12 has
lxen redeood as to its rdation to the W.dth ani type if pawrrnt rmhi to amy the type ani quantity if traffic
wrratai, in that the City has adiquatdy euduami the pa:ential irrpacts assaiatai Wth the prcfJam autorrd:Jile
dealership prim to its appraw1 ani has anIitinml the prcjoct to k serud by ro1ds if ad<<juate capaJity ani
desiwz. starxlards to prucide reasanahle aaI3S.
5. In approving the subject use located at the southwest comer of Auto Center Drive and Avenue
12, there will be no adverse affect on abutting property or the pennitted and nonnal use thereof.
The prqJam use has bren ~ly reriew:d ani anIitinml by all applU:al:ie City Departrrmts ani altSide
AwOO, dirrinating the pa:ential for arTj ani all adwse iff<<ts an the abuttingfJ'fqJefty.
6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.74.50 of the LEMC have been
incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Pennit to insure that the use continues in
a manner envisioned by these findings for the term of the use.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-06
Page 3 of 3
Pursuant to Soction 17.74.050 (Action if the Planning OJrnriss~ if the Lake Elsimre Muniapal 0x1e
(LEMC), the autorrchile dealership la:auri at the sal1:lnu3t rorrrr if Auto O:nter Dri:re am A 'lE11Ue 12 has
lren sch<<Juled far ronsideration am appruud if the Planning OJrnrissWn.
Ronald LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on December 6, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES:
Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
FRANCIA
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
A~
Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Secretary to the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-155
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 2005-03 FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AUTO
CENTER DRIVE AND AVENUE 12
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Ro Frank
Johnson, The Automotive Group, to request the approval of Variance 2005-03, for the reduction
in the parking and landscaping setbacks along Auto Center Drive and Avenue 12; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of approving Variances for the requirements of the Zoning Code; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on December 6,
2005;
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for
Variance No. 2005-03 and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and
determines that this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and determines
that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-06 is adequate and prepared in accordance with
the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes
environmental effects of ends City Council certification, based upon the following findings and
determinations:
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.76 (Variances)) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the project have been made as follows:
1. That adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.76.050 have been
incorporated into the approval of the Variance to insure development of the property in
accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in
which the site is located.
The proposed Variance located at the southwest corner of Auto Center Drive and Avenue
12 complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan, in that the approval of
this reduction in parking and landscaping setback from 20 foot average and 15 foot
minimum to 10 feet will assist in achieving the development of a well-balanced and
functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and
institutional land uses as well as encouraging industrial land uses to diversify Lake
Elsinore's economic base. Further, adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
VARIANCE NO. 2005-03
Page 2 of 3
Section 17.76.050 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), have been incorporated
in the approval of the variance to insure development of the property in accord with the
objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is
located. Approval of the Variance will allow the project to be built in accordance with
ultimate street dedication and right-ol-way requirements and still maintain development
consistency with other automobile dealership buildings in the immediate area.
2. That there are special circumstances, pursuant to the purpose of this Chapter, applicable
to the subject property which do apply generally to other properties in the neighborhood,
and, therefore, granting of the Variance shall not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and district in which
the subject property is located.
The proposed Variance located at the southwest corner of Auto Center Drive and Avenue
12 is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the proposed
automobile dealership has been designed in consideration of the size shape and
topography of the property, thereby creating interest and varying vistas as a person
moves along the street. The project as proposed, will complement the quality of existing
development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the
proposed and existing projects in that the building orientation and setbacks, as well as
architectural design, color and materials and will not constitute a grant of special
privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and
district in which the subject project is located.
3. That in approving the Variance, any reductions authorized from the strict interpretation of
the Zoning Ordinance represents the minimum deviation from the Code necessary to
fulfill the purpose of this Chapter and enable reasonable development of the property.
In granting a reduction of the parking and landscaping setbacks along Auto Center Drive
and Avenue 12, the City has determined that the request for a variance will represent the
minimum deviation from the Code necessary to fulfill the purpose of this Chapter and
enable reasonable development of the property.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above F'n gs, the Planning Commission ofthe City
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Var anee o.~
Ron LaPere, Chairman
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR
VARIANCE NO. 2005-03
Page 3 of 3
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a
meeting thereof conducted on December 6, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
LAPERE, O'NEAL, GONZALES, LARIMER
NOES:
Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
FRANCIA
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
(J;7n
Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Secretary to the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-156
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE OTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED ON HOLBOROW
AVENUE - APN 378-261-035
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Gty of Lake Elsinore by Corey Roberts,
Structural Consultants, requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for a Single Family Residence
pursuant to Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards),
Chapter 17.23 (R-1, Single Family Residential District) and Chapter 17.66 (parking Requirements) of
the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMq; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Conunission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Minor Design Review requests for Single Family Residential Projects;
and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Conunission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on December 06, 2005 and then
continued to December 20, 2005.
NOW lHEREFORE, the Planning Conunission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Conunission has considered the proposed design for the single
family residence and has found it acceptable. The Planning Conunission finds and determines that
this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and is exempt from further
environmental clearance under Section 15303, Oass 3(a) (New Construction or Conversion of Small
Structures), of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of the project have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The prcfJaro M imr Dl5igp Redew la:atRd at 16772 HdbaruwA'U?J1Ue ronplies Wth the ~ and dJjoctiw if
the Gelrral Plan, in that the apflrol111 if the sirrJe-farrily residerxe Wll assist in adiering the deuioprmrt if a
wiJ-WlarXBl and.fWx:tiunal nix if residential, ronnI?rcial, irxlustrial, open spaa?, rrrrPational and institutional
land USl5 as wiJ as ermuaging the deuioprmrt and rmintenan:e if a brwd ra11f!? if haising types far all irrnrrE
graIfJS and aw~.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The prcfJaro Mimr Dl5igp Redew la:atRd at 16772 Hdbaruw A'U?J1Ue is appropriate in the size and
surrrxnling, deuioprmrt in that the sirrJe-farrily residem! W11 ronplem?nt the qua/icy if ecisting deuioprmrt
and W11 cmtte a Usually pleasin& mn-detraai:ce rriationship beturen the prcfJaro and ecisting prr!ftts in that
the arrhitatural dtsigp, alar and rmterials prcfJaro nm or ecam the size and dtsigp if the hom:s in the
surrrxnling, area.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-156
DECEMBER 20, 2005
Page 2 of 2
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
The JrtrfJaed Mimr Desi[!fl Reriew la:aurJ at 16772 Hdbaraw A W7Ue as rerieuJxl am anlitiarxd by all
applU:aiie City Di'lisians am Departrrm/s am A wries, W/1 rxx: haw a sif!J1ijicant iffix:t on the emiran11'Fl1t
pursuant to A rtide 19 (CaugJria11 Exerrptians) am Soction 15303, Odss 3(a) (New Canstruaion or
Omersion if Smdl Stn<<:tures) if the Gdifamia E rni:ranm!ntal QIality Act (CE QA).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incOlporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Mimr Desi[!fl Reriew if a sinJe farrily resifien:E la:aurJ at 16772 Hdbaraw A W7Ue has been euduated
pursuant toSoction 17.82.100 (Mimr Desi[!flRerieu) if the Lake Elsimre Municipal OxIe(LEMC) amall
ci:her applU:aiie S<<tians if the LEMC The prc!frt 7mS fani to /:;e in ronpliarr:e Wth all ~ am
dJjoctiw ifLEMC
NOW, 1HEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the Gty
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Minor Desi n Review for a Single Family Residence
located at 16772 Holborow Avenue.
g Commission
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on December 20,2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
LARIMER, GONZALES, LAPERE
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Gmunissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
O'NEAL
ATTEST:
f>>7h--
Rolfe Preisendanz, Secretary to the Planning Commission
U:\lmiller\ALL FILES\Resolutions-Ordinances\200S\RESO 2005- MDR-SFR 16772 Holborow Avenue 12-20-0S.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-157
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE aTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED ON LAGAYE STREET,
REFRRED AS APN 379-140-084.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Gty of Lake Elsinore by Mr. McElroy,
requesting Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence and a detached second unit; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Conunission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving a Minor Design Review for Single Family Residences; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Conunission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on December 20,2005.
NOW TIIEREFORE, the Planning Conunission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Conunission has considered the proposed request for a Minor
Design Review for a Single Family Residence and has found it acceptable. The Planning
Conunission finds and determines that this project is consistent with Chapter 17.23 (R-E Estate
Single Family Residential District) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMq and that this action
is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to
Section 15303;
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The 1JrqJaed M imr Desigp Redew la:atai at the rmh side if L eGa;e Strret, apprr:Kimttely 800 feet rmh if
McuhadtJ Strret, also krmmas APN 379-140-084 ronpliRs Wth the gWs am dJjocti'lRS if the GeJrral Plan,
in that the appruud if this sirrJe-farrily residerxe Wl1 assist in adiering, the deuloprmrt if a uell-tularmi am
fun:tioml rrix if residential, rorrm?YCial, irxiustrial, q;en spcue, nrrrational am institutianallani uses as uell as
ermtragj:rrg, the deuloprmrt am rruintenarxe if a bro:td ra~ if hoosing types for all inxJnr g;wps am af!!
categJriRs .
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The 1JrqJaed M imr Desigp Redew la:atai at the rmh side if LeGa;e Strret, apprr:Kimttely 800 feet rmh if
McuhadtJ Strret, also krmm as A PN 379-140-084 is apprrpriate to the site am s~ deuJqmrnts in
that the sinJe farrily ham? has been desigml in wnsideratian if the size am shape if the property, thereby
crrating interest am wrying Usfas as a person nmes along the street. Further the prqa:t as 1JrqJaed Wl1
ronplemn the quality if lXisting deuloprmrt am Wl1 create a Usually pkasirr& mn-detractiw relationship
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-157
PAGE NO.2
I:m.u!en the propaed ani existirrgf>>Tiocts in that the arrhitatural di5igp, alar ani mzterittls propaed excmls the
size ani di5igp if the hom5 in the surraurling ami.
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuant to the California E mi:rul1frI!J1tal QIality Act (CE QA), the propaedMimr Dt5igpRedewla:atm an
Lash Strret at ASSl~sor Parrel Nrmkr 378-243-021, as rf!lieued ani anlitiorxd by all applicalie City
Di'tisions ani Departrrrnts ani A wries, W1l rD; haw a sifl1ificant iff<</: an the enUronn1!J1t pursuant to A rtide
19 (Categorical Exemptions) ani S<<tion 15303 (New ConstnJction or Conversion of SmaU
StnJcWres).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Pursuant to S<<tion 17.82.100 (Mimr Dt5igp Redeu) if the Lake Elsimre Municipal Cafe (LEMC), the
propaed Mimr Desigp Redew la:atm an Lash Strret at Assessor Parrel Nrmkr 378-243-021 has bren
schedukrl ani ronsidered for apprawl by the Planning Comnission
NOW, TI-IEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the Gty
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE of the Minor Design Review for a Single-Family
Residence and a detached second unit, located at the north side of LeGaye Street, approximately 800
feet north of Machado Street, also known as APN 379-14 084.
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on December 20,2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
O'NEAL, LARIMER, GONZALES
LAPERE
NOES:
Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners
A~
Rolfe M Preisendanz, Secretary to the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-158
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE aTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING OF MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR THE
CONSTRUCfION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A DUPLEX
(2 UNITS) LOCATED ON HEALD STREET
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Gty of Lake Elsinore by Daniel Lopez to
request the approval of a Minor Design Review located on :Heald Street; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving Minor Design Reviews for residential projects; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission
has considered and approved the request by staff on December 20, 2005.
NOW lHEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECfION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for the
Minor Design Review for a duplex development and has found it acceptable. The Planning
Commission finds and determines that this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal
Code and determines that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects, and based upon the following
findings and determinations:
SECfION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the project have been made as follows:
FINDINGS - MINOR DESIGN REVIEW
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The propaedMirvr Df5ignReriewla:ated at Hedd Strret (APN 373-034-019) empiies uith the gW am
dJjeai715 if the Gerual Plan, in that the appruw1 if the sirrJe-farrily residerre Wl1 assist in achierirg the
~ if a wil-b:tJarmJ am furxtimal rrix if residential, aJtml?YCial, irxlustrid, q;en sfXKE, mreational
am institutianallam USf5 as wil as ermuaging the ~ am mtinternrre if a bratd ra1W if hoosirrg
tyjX5 far all ~ g;mps am a~ cate;pries.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
The propaed M irvr Df5ign Reriew la:ated at Hedd Strret (A PN 373-034-019) is appropriate in the size am
surranling, ~ in that the sirrJe-farrily residerre Wl1 emplemmt the qualiEy if lXistirrg ~
am Wl1 create a Usually pleas~ mn-detractiw rrlationship be1:uPen the propaed am lXistirrg prrjocrs in that
the archiurtural dEsif!f1, aim- am mlterials propaed met or lXam the size am dEsign if the hom3 in the
surranling, arm
RESOLUTION NO. 158
DECEMBER 20. 2005
Page 2 of2
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
The prcpaf11 M imr lliifll Redew kratai at Heald Strret (A PN 373-034-019) as reriewxi am wrxlitiorxd
by all applicaJie City Di'lisions am Departrrmts am Awm, Wll1tt haw a sigpifi:ant iffirt an the
enUrarllrEflt pursuant to A rtide 19 (Cate;prical Exenptians) am Soction 15303, Class 3(a) (New
Omstruction or Comersion if Smdl Stn<<:tures) if the California E rniranm:nta1 ~ity A a (CE Q4).
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.100 of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incOIporated into the
approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives of Chapter 17.82.
Mimr Desifll Redew if a sirrJe farrily residerKE kratai at Heald Strret (APN 373-034-019) has am
eu:duaud pursuant to Soction 17.82.100 (Mimr Desifll Recieu) if the Lake Elsimre Municipal Oxle
(LEMC) am all ether applicaJie Sfftions if the LEMC The />>Tim wtS fanl to k in ronpliarxE Wth all
~ am dJjoctius ifLEMC
NOW, 1HEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the Gty
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Minor Design Review for the construction and
establishment of a duplex (2 units) located on Heald Stree .
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on December 20, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
O'NEAL, LARIMER, LAPERE
GONZALES
NOES:
Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Qmunissioners:
A~
Rolfe Preisendanz, Secretary to the Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-159
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF
FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH SECTION 6.0 OF
THE MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION
PLAN (MSHCP) FOR THE PROJCT KNOWN AS
INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-01 TO BE
LOCATED ON PASADENA STREET
WHEREAS, a site specific focused survey (Getrral Bidaiml Resatrr13 Assessm!J1t) for the
Burrowing Owl, Oiteria Area Species, and Narrow Endemic Plan Species was required by the
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) for the purpose of allowing development of
an industrial building and associated improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore evaluated the consistency of the project with the
MSHC]); and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on December 20, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of making recommendation to the City Council adopting the Findings of
Consistency with the MSHC]); and
NOW 1HEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
The Habitat Assessment Report prepared by has been prepared by Principe and Associates,
submitted and reviewed in accordance with requirements of the Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The report is complete and adequate in it's evaluation of all
environmental effects of the project known as Industrial Design Review No. 2005-01 and will
not preclude the implementation of the MSHc]) goals, based on the following finding:
FINDINGS - Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
1. The proposed project is consistent with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
A crording to the Multiple SJXrit5 Habitat Oneruttion Plan (MSHCP), "Wtthin identijUd Narrow E rx:Ienic
Plant SJXrit5 surrey areas (NE PSSA), siJ:e.spocific fixusm, stm.e)5 far Narrow E rx:Ienic Plant SJXrit5 shall be
r<<jUimi far all puUi1: am primte prq<<:ts uhen appropriate habitat is present." Sine the Getrral Bidaiml
Resatrr13 Assessm!J1t claud Septerrb!r 21, 2005 the fani rKJ appropriate habitat far Narrow E rx:Ienic Plant
S JXrit5 future focus studies are rxx r<<jUiml.
RESOLUTION No. 2005- 159
December 20, 2005
Page 2 of 2
NOW, TIIEREFORE, based on the above Finding, the Planning Conunission of the Gty of
Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECDMMEND that the Gty Council of the Gty of Lake Elsinore
adopt the Finding of Consistency with the Multiple Specie Habitat Conservation Plan.
Michae
Lake E
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Conunission at a meeting
thereof conducted on December 20,2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Conunissioners:
O'NEAL, LARIMER, GONZALES, LAPERE
NOES: Conunissioners:
ABSENT: Conunissioners:
ABSTAIN: Conunissioners:
A~
Rolfe Preisendanz, Secretary to the Planning Conunission
U:\lmiIler\ALL FILES\Resolutions-Ordinances\200S\RESO 2005- MSHQ> I 2005-0112-20-0S.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-160
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-01, TO BE
LOCATED ON PASADENA STREET
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Gty of Lake Elsinore by Kirk Moeller, of
McArdle Associates Architects, to request approval of Industrial Design Review No. 2005-01 for an
industrial complex consisting of four (4) buildings and associated improvements; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on December 20, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of recommending approval of industrial projects to Gty Council.
NOW lHEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECfION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed design for the
industrial building and associated improvements. The Planning Commission finds and determines
this project is consistent with the General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The project
has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant to Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects. A General Biological Resources
Assessment dated September 21,2005 has been submitted pursuant to the requirements of the Multi
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP);
SECfION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the findings for the approval of the Design Review of Industrial Project No. 2005-
01 have been made as follows:
FINDINGS - Industrial Design Review No. I 2005-01
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The -propaad Irrlustrial D{5i8J1Redewla:atRd at APN 377-130-030 ronplies Wth the gWs am chje::tim if
the Gelrral Plan, in that the ctpprrJU1l if tlxse irxlustrial busin:ss park Wll assist in adJiedng in dereloprrrnt if
a 7.P.EI1-Wlarml am JUrrtiornl rrix if residential, ~ irxlustrial, cpen spare, mreational am
institutional lam US{5 as 7.P.EI1 as ermtraging irxlustriallam US{5 to di7EYSify Lake E lsimreJs ecarvrrit: Wse
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-160
DECEMBER 20, 2005
Page 2 of 2
The prcpaed Irx1ustritd Desi8fl Retiew located at A PN 377-130-030 is apprcpriate to the site am sunmnling
derdqmmts in that the prcpaed irxlustritd businss park has been dt5iwm in ronsideration if the size am
shape if the prq;erty, thereby creating interest am wrying 'listas as a person mYU3 along the strret. Further the
prrju:t as prcpaed Wll CIJJrfJlerrmt the quality if existirr6 deuJoprrmt am Wll cwate a 'liswlly pleasing, rvn-
detraaiw rrIationship I:x:turen the prcpaed am existirr6 prrj<<ts in that the arrhitmural dt5ign, cdar am
rruterials am site dt5i8fl prcpaed eri.derl-e a anem for quality am arigjrulity.
3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result
in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Pursuant to the OJ1ifamia E mirarrrrmtal Q.tality Act (CE 04), the prcpaed Irx1ustritd Desi8flRetiewlocated
at A PN 377-130- 030, as been rr:delJ.ed am anlitinrx:d by all applicalie City Di'lisions am Departm!rlts am
Ag:n.:its, am Wll rK1: haw a sigpificant iffirt on the emi:runnrrrtd pursuant to Gerrral Bidagjcal Resatra3
Assessmmt dat<<l Septeni:x?r 21, 2005.
4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, of the Zoning Code, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject project to insure development of the property in accordance with the
objectives Chapter 17.82.
Pursuant to Su:tion 17.74.050 (Action if the PIa11J1ing, Cormiss~ if the Lake Elsimre Municipal 0:x1e
(LEMC), the prcpaed Irx1ustritd Desi8fl Retiew located at APN 377-130-030 has been sdxrluled for
ronsideration am appruud if the PIa11J1ing, Cormission
NOW, 1HEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the Gty
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND TO 1HE an COUNaL APPROVAL of
Industrial Design Review No. 2005-01.
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was a opted by the Planning Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on December 20,2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Gmunissioners:
O'NEAL, LARIMER, GONZALES, LAPERE
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
A~
Ro e Preisendanz, Secretary to the Planning Commission
RESO 2005- 12005-0112-20-05.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-161
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE aTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 17157 SHRIER
DRIVE.
WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Gty of Lake Elsinore by Mr. Hector
Zubieta, requesting Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Conunission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with
the responsibility of approving a Minor Design Review for Single Family Residences; and
WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Conunission
has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on December 20, 2005.
NOW TIIEREFORE, the Planning Conunission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. The Planning Conunission has considered the proposed request for a Minor
Design Review for a Single Family Residence and has found it acceptable. The Planning
Conunission finds and determines that this project is consistent with Chapter 17.23 (R-1 Single
Family Residential District) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMq and that this action is
exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to
Section 15303;
SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code the following findings for the have been made as follows:
1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the
Zoning District in which the project is located.
The ~<<iMimr Df5igpRedewla:ated at 17157 Shrier Dri:re ronplils Wth the ~ am dJjoctiw if the
Gen?ral Plan, in that the apJ>>TJU1l if this sin[je- farrily miderx:e Wll assist in achiedng, the deuJqmmt if a 'lRIil.
Wl4rm1 am.fun:tiarnl nix if midential, camrI?YCial, irrlustrial, open s~ m:reational am institutWnallam
USf5 as uell as errouragjng the deuJqmmt ard mlintenarn! if a brwd rarlf!? if hoosing types for all in:J:Jrrr
gJmps ama~~.
2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
Agenda Item No._
Page _ Of
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-121
PAGE NO.2
The prcpa<<i M imr D{5iWZ Redew la:atsJ at 17157 Simer Driw is apprqrriate to the site am surranlirrg,
~ in that the sinJe farrily barrE has b?en dtsigmi in ronsideration if the size am shape if the
property, thereby credting interest am wrying 'listds as a person rrmes along the strret. Further the prrj<<t as
prcpa<<i Wll rorrplem!nt the quality if existing deuiopnm am Wll create a 'liswlly plmsin& rxJi1-detraaiw
nlatianship bero.ren the prcpa<<i am existing prrjocrs in that the arrhitmural dtsigp, alar am rruteriaIs
prcpa<<i exa:eds the size am dtsiwz if the hams in the surranlirrg, area.
3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of
compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to
insure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and the
planning district in which the site is located.
Pursuant to Section 17.82.100 (Mimr D{5iWZRederi) if the Lake Elsimre Municipal CaJe (LEMq, the
prcpa<<i M imr D{5iWZ Redew la:atsJ at 17157 Simer Driw has b?en sch<<Jukri am ronsiderm far approw1 by
the Pla111'1irf, Cormission.
NOW, TIIEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the Gty
of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE of the Minor Design Review for a Single-Family
Residence located at 17157 Shrier Drive.
I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting
thereof conducted on December 20, 2005 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
O'NEAL, LARIMER, GONZALES, LAPERE
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners
~ secret~to the Planning Commission
AGENDA I1EM NO.
PAGE OF