Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4. Environmental Information Form (1) Docusign Envelope ID:374FDAA2-0E08-4BF0-8558-3C626A1 B7F57 CITY OF rim LAKE ,LSIN011P Environmental Information Form DREAM [XI REML Date Filed: Planning Application No.: GENERAL INFORMATION Developer or Applicant: Alberhill Development, LLC. Contact Person: Address: 505 Lomas Santa Fe, Suite 230 Telephone: Email: Address of Project: See Attachment 1 -APN List Proposed Use of Site: Assessor's Parcel Numbers See Attachment 1 -APN List (APNs): FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Number of Units: N/A Unit Sizes: N/A Units per Acre: N/A Lot Sizes: N/A Number of Parking Spaces: N/A FOR COMMERCIAL AND OTHER DEVELOPMENT Type of Development: Industrial Number of Buildings: 1 Size of Buildings: 1,054,794 SF Number of Parking Spaces: 797 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION Please provide a separate written response for questions#1-4, it is recommended that photographs be provided in support of submitted answers. 1. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants, and animals, and any cultural or scenic aspects. 2. Describe any existing structures onsite and use of these structures. Docusign Envelope ID:374FDAA2-OE08-4BFO-8558-3C626A1B7F57 3. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. 4. Describe the types of surrounding land use, intensity of land use, and sale of development. 5. Identify any other related permits and other public approvals requires for this project including those required by the City, regional, State, Federal agencies, not including approvals from the City, fire department, sheriff's department, and Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. Is any part of the Project, on-or off-site, located within a Criteria Cell pursuant to the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP)? If so, what are the Criteria Cell#(s)?: If not known, please enter all APNs at the following website to run a report: https://wrcrca.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=2b9d4520bd5f4d35ad d35fb58808c1b7 The City is a Lead Agency under CEQA, and is required under State law to ensure compliance. All projects are subject to a review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and will consist of one (1) or more of the following: • If not exempt, preparation of technical studies will be required to support determination of appropriate CEQA process, as described below. • Determination by Planning Division that all project impacts are less than significant or can be mitigated to less than significant. As such, the City will direct preparation of a Negative Declaration (ND) or Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). • Determination by Planning Division that at least (1) project impact cannot be mitigates to less than significant levels. As such, the City will direct preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). All CEQA documents must be prepared either by City Staff OR by a qualified, City-approved consultant under direct contract with the City but funded by the Applicant. Depending on the environmental impacts potentially resulting from your project, technical studies that may be required, but may not be limited, included: • Air Quality Analysis • Noise Study • Traffic Impact Analysis • Geotechnical Study • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Hazardous Materials) • Hydrology Study or Conceptual Drainage Plan • Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan • Biological Resources Study (also used to support MSHCP consistency work) • Cultural Resources Study Docusign Envelope ID:374FDAA2-OE08-4BFO-8558-3C626A1B7F57 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. DocuSigned by: 8/8/2024 Signature: Pt Date: Docusign Envelope ID:374FDAA2-0E08-4BF0-8558-3C626A1 B7F57 Kimley>>> Horn 1. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants, and animals, and any cultural or scenic aspects. Alberhill Development, LLC. is proposing a Specific Plan Amendment to the Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan and an Industrial Design Review for the West Nichols Logistics Center. The Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment includes the expansion of the specific plan boundary by adding approximately 46.8 acres to Planning Areas 2. Additionally, the amendment will revise the land use plan by adding an Industrial land use and remove the Neighborhood Commercial land use. The application also includes an Industrial Design Review package for the development of a 60.7-acre industrial site that would accommodate an approximately 1 million square foot logistics center. Environmental Resource Finding Aesthetics Historically, the project site and adjacent areas have been subjected to mining activities. Clay and coal were discovered in the project vicinity in the 1800s. Most properties north of the project site are undeveloped or were used for past mining activities. To the east, low density residential development exists. The predominant type of housing is single-family detached south of the project site. To the west of Planning Area #3, Pacific Clay Products-operates its ceramic factory near the Lake Street interchange. Clay mining operations also are in process in this area. The majority of recent development has occurred south and west of the site. Source: Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment#2 Airports The nearest airport to the property is the Perris Valley Airport L-65, located about 15 miles east of the subject property. According to the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission, the property is not within a compatibility zone. Source: Riverside Co. Airport Land Use Commission Soils The geology of the site includes Santiago Peak Volcanics, Alluvium, and the Pauba Formation in Planning Areas #1 and #2 and Alluvium in Planning Area #1. According to geotechnical investigation conducted for Alberhill Ranch,the project site is suitable for development from a geotechnical standpoint. See Exhibit 1. Source: Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment#2 Hazards There is one closed LUST Cleanup Site in Planning Area 3. See Exhibit 2. Docusign Envelope ID:374FDAA2-OE08-4BFO-8558-3C626A1B7F57 Kimley >> Horn FindingEnvironmental Resource Source: California State Water Resources Control Board Geotracker Fire Hazard The project is in High and Very High fire hazard areas. See Exhibit 3. Source: Ca/Fire Fire Hazard Severity Zone Ma Floodplain Planning Area 1- Not in FEMA floodplain. Planning Area 2- Not in FEMA floodplain. Planning Area 3- Portion within Zone AE. See Exhibit 3. Source: FEMA Flood Map Service Center Wetlands Planning Area 1- Riverine habitat. Planning Area 2- None. Planning Area 3- Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland habitat is classified as a PFOC. See Exhibit 4. Source: US Fish& Wildlife, National Wetlands Inventory 2. Describe any existing structures onsite and use of these structures. Single-family homes, an elementary school, parks, and supporting infrastructure (e.g. water tanks) are existing on Planning Area 1. Planning Areas 2 and 3 are undeveloped. 3. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. The surrounding properties are historic mining areas. Mining in the Alberhill area, including the Pacific Clay mine, began roughly around the same time that the region's first railroad, the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railroad, was completed in the 1880s. The railroad, along with various mining opportunities, greatly increased migration to the Lake Elsinore area. Portions of Lake Street and Coal Road (now named Nichols Road) are generally aligned with a section of the railroad that has since been removed in that area. Pacific Clay still conducts mining operations within the Alberhill Villages Specific Plan area, bounded by Lake Street to the east and Temescal Canyon Road to the north. Properties to the south continue to be developed as residential, commercial, and institutional uses. Properties to the east remain mostly undeveloped. 4. Describe the types of surrounding land use, intensity of land use, and sale of development. DevelopmentDirection Type of Surrounding Land Use Intensity of Land Sale of North Planning Area 1-Alberhill Ridge Specific Plan Planning Areas 1- Planning Area 2-Alberhill Ridge Specific Plan 3: Varies by _ Planning Area 3- Interstate 15 Planning Area within Specific Plan Docusign Envelope ID:374FDAA2-OE08-4BFO-8558-3C626A1B7F57 Kimley 3)) Horn DevelopmentDirection Type of Surrounding Land Use Intensity of Land Sale of East Planning Area 1- Limited Manufacturing (M- Planning Area 1: 1), General Manufacturing (M-2) 0.45 FAR Planning Area 2-Alberhill Ridge Specific Plan Planning Area 2: _ Planning Area 3- Lake Street Varies by Planning Area within Specific Plan South Planning Area 1- Cape of Good Hope Planning Areas 1- Specific Plan, Terracina Specific Plan 3: Varies by Planning Area 2- Murdock Alberhill Ranch Planning Area - Specific Plan within Specific Plan Planning Area 3- Temescal Canyon Road West Planning Area 1- Single-Family Residential Planning Area 1: 1- (R-1) 6 DU/AC Planning Area 2-Alberhill Ridge Specific Plan Planning Areas 2 _ Planning Area 3- Alberhill Villages Specific and 3: Varies by Plan Planning Area within Specific Plan 5. Identify any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project including those required by the City, regional, State, Federal agencies, not including approvals from the City, fire department, sheriff's department, and Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. Approvals outside of City of Lake Elsinore purview have not been determined at this time. Approval by other governmental approval bodies may be required as processing progresses. 6. Is any part of the Project, on-or off-site, located within a Criteria Cell pursuant to the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP)?If so,what are the Criteria Cell #(s)?: Yes, Criteria Cell #3751, 4056, 4057, 4156, 4157, and 4060. Docusign Envelope ID:374FDAA2-OE08-4BFO-8558-3C626A1 B7F57 txnum -i . %'Soii iviap Soil Map—Western Riverside Area,California 3 N (Exhibit 1. Murdock Alberhill Ranch SP Soil Survey) N r 462900 463500 464100 464700 465300 4659W 466500 33°44'13"N _t ,. J 1� -: _ 33°44'13"N zz k l" gib• �) •� { � ;*� ! ���' -=�� � � D WN �; ,ram .,•` ��.: ' � •� ' .� D_ M A IT !Y!LLnL1-=.V r:'. �r:l[Ri'.' � r !! D Ybn• Kr - J �#�"a�. � I,®G �/�r�.U��`L•Lh°J 77 may,, 4 N A 33°41'28"N M "` 33°41'28"N 462900 463500 464100 464700 465300 465900 466500 Ln 3 3 0 N Map Scale:1:24,700 if printed on A portrait(8.5"x 11")sheet. P Meters IN 0 350 700 1400 2100 Feet 0 1000 2000 4000 6000 Map projection:Web Mercator Comer coordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:LF M Zone 11N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/30/2024 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4 Docusign Envelope ID:374FDAA2-0E08-4BF0-8558-3C626A1 137F57 Soil Map—Western Riverside Area,California (Exhibit 1. Murdock Alberhill Ranch SP Soil Survey) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest(AOI) Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at Area of Interest(AOI) 1:15,800. Stony Spot Soils Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map Soil Map Unit Polygons Very Stony Spot measurements. � Soil Map Unit Lines Wet Spot Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service . Other Web Soil Survey LIRL: p Soil Map Unit Points Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857) Special Line Features Special Point Features Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator V Blowout water Features projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts Streams and Canals distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the Borrow Pit Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more Transportation)( Clay Spot accurate calculations of distance or area are required. � Rails Closed Depression This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as ,✓ Interstate Highways of the version date(s)listed below. `- Gravel Pit US Routes Soil Survey Area: Western Riverside Area,California Gravelly Spot Major Roads Survey Area Data: Version 16,Aug 30,2023 Landfill Local Roads Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales Lava Flow 1:50,000 or larger. Background Marsh or swamp Aerial Photography Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Mar 14,2022—Mar 17,2022 Mine or Quarry The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were Co Miscellaneous Water compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor C, Perennial Water shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Rock Outcrop Y Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip oa Sodic Spot USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/30/2024 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4 Docusign Envelope ID:374FDAA2-OE08-4BFO-8558-3C626A1B7F57 Soil Map-Western Riverside Area,California Exhibit 1.Murdock Alberhill Ranch SP Soil Survey Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI AaD Altamont clay,5 to 15 percent 14.2 2.5% slopes AaE2 Altamont clay, 15 to 25 percent 17.5 3.1% slopes,eroded AbF Altamont cobbly clay,8 to 35 113.9 19.8% percent slopes AkC Arbuckle loam,2 to 8 percent 1.6 0.3% slopes CkF2 Cieneba rocky sandy loam, 15 103.2 18.0% to 50 percent slopes,eroded CrD Cortina cobbly sandy loam,2 10.2 1.8% to 12 percent slopes FaD2 Fallbrook sandy loam,8 to 15 5.4 0.9% percent slopes,eroded GaC Garretson very fine sandy 10.7 1.9% loam,2 to 8 percent slopes GdC Garretson gravelly very fine 3.1 0.5% sandy loam,2 to 8 percent slopes GhC Gorgonio loamy sand,0 to 8 13.3 2.3% percent slopes GyD2 Greenfield sandy loam,8 to 15 5.2 0.9% percent slopes,eroded HcC Hanford coarse sandy loam,2 35.3 6.2% to 8 percent slopes HnC Honcut sandy loam,2 to 8 4.3 0.7% percent slopes LpF2 Lodo rocky loam,25 to 50 46.2 8.0% percent slopes,eroded PIB Placentia fine sandy loam,0 to 12.8 2.2% 5 percent slopes PID Placentia fine sandy loam,5 to 30.0 5.2% 15 percent slopes PoC Porterville clay,0 to 8 percent 0.1 0.0% slopes RaB2 Ramona sandy loam,2 to 5 7.7 1.3% percent slopes,eroded RaD3 Ramona sandy loam,8 to 15 20.5 3.6% percent slopes,severely eroded RuF Rough broken land 99.4 17.3% TeG Terrace escarpments 4.9 0.8% TwC Tujunga gravelly loamy sand,0 0.3 0.0% to 8 percent slopes usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/30/2024 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 Docusign Envelope ID:374FDAA2-OE08-4BFO-8558-3C626A1 B7F57 Soil Map—Western Riverside Area,California Exhibit 1. Murdock Alberhill Ranch SP Soil Survey Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI VsF2 Vista coarse sandy loam, 15 to 15.0 2.6% 35 percent slopes,eroded Totals for Area of Interest 574.6 100.0% usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/30/2024 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4 Docusign Envelope ID:374FDAA2-OE08-4BFO-8558-3C626AlB7F57 nds Exhibit Ziucti ,up • ■ j �I Luiseno ■ Alt er�`� - - Elementary School• 1 1 �locrhill Rancr� unit, p Park 0 LEGENO- X Rt,.. ! Wean$�XIr19S 0 LUST Cleanup SRes- Cleanup Progam SRes- ■MllRary Cleanup SRes- ■Military Privat2eR SRes- ■Military RSr Siles- ArnvE M1RCWERAPsc IRary Basss- - -- C% •We11aMs- -- ,. �CaIGEM-Feld BouMarles- --- - '` -' -- WHISTAR-All Wells- - ■ �flegignal MonRaing Program Sampling Poinls- - �CaIGEM-Primary PrgJuclive Limns- - � CaIGEM-Post Primacy AguRer Exempto�xs- =LIST SfTES VISIBLE ON Docusign Envelope ID:374FDAA2-OE08-4BFO-8558-3C626A1B7F57 minion a. Fire hazard r-xniait r N ,d• c Ji j ,. ��r!{Jf ,ffrodnw6rwd `r f� a1rl e _ fir f - k el.;— S FIRE HAZARD ZONES e ®SPHERE OF INFLUENCE LP. ®CITY BOUNDARY VERY HIGH -HIGH 0 MODERATE OURCES:11TY OF LAKE ELSINORE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY&FIRE PROTECTION Qtv W CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE LAKE 'LSIttOIZE N o Is nv1l, WILDFIRE SUSCEPTIBILITY D.—k�—. FIGURE 3.10-2 Docusign Envelope ID:374FDAA2-OE08-4BFO-8558-3C626A1B7F57 F—,AiiiuiL 4. rr-ivuA riuOupidiii Exhibit AEA ��-ersi e Cohnty - r i I I11Iic fate n � _ Y ' 33�7266�73, 117.398051 / �� _ city o£ E-lsinor ilia �s"�1J it %Xas_ ' �• Docusign Envelope ID:374FDAA2-OE08-4BFO-8558-3C626A1B7F57 Exhibit 4. rCIVIA Hooapiain Exhibit .fir N ne AE Jr eet ��t,r ,•, � � �� wiGy Of Lak fi •. ��• !lstn {- .��F d 33.710331,-117.371198 1` ♦, _ _ •a tom• Y,e� �h �k-i .; ,/ ZoneAE 1 E - �; i t r LSDA,JSGS The Ne:ioral Mac:Or.-_ -^,agery.Date refreshed Jura,2024. 'owered by Esh ♦ Approarmte brabon based on user vut 11N08111 base Flood Elevation(BFE) >Y d tawr A.ass B oss Sections with 1'k.Annual Chance aridOon not represent an authorastne Property boaoon HAZARD FLOOD WBn BFE r Dapth ifs Water Surtace Devahon PIN FIR2.ARD AREAS Regtalatr)Ftooewry mbar AILAo,an.K,.rrr o-__ Coastal traanM —__Bate F tood Ele..l lon Lim f BF EI SWaad Ftoodatap aouodar)' Lknrt ar Study 0.2e Mnual chance FloodNanrd.Areas DOW DUB av✓abM of 1%annual chance nood Mth average Jurisdiction Boundary NO�y Data A,"We, depth IeSS then one toot or with drainage --—Coaahal Traaranct Basaleo reaI of le- than one square mue= OTHER _ protae Saw", MAP PANELS lJnmapDed Future Condtuoro 1N Annual FEATURES HydroVaphrc Feature Chance Flood Hazard- ®Area of rAwilrnl Flood Hard Mee wall Reduced Flood Rnk due to GENERAL _——' ChannM Culvert,or S4nm1 So—, ohimmi Lo/1b OTHER AREAS OF Levee Saar No1—= I� STRUCTURES r i r r r r r Levee.Drke.or Flood raa At"M IJadllrrruKd Flood KA:ard FLOOD HAZARD Area wath Flood Risk due to Levee OWetdle Praletrled Area OTHER AREAS®Con"Barnes Resource stem Area