The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutEast Lake Specific Plan - Amendment No. 6 i}:+.^,-`i?i4„q�;�it4F♦exA'k:_ .:f e , ............. . FINAL EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN f . AMENDMENT SIX Lake Elsinore, California g� •�' as a m" �+� ev pe � �t 1 y'�r �•.A .V� � f aa�4 m..rAa, tib;� �� _ u q • 6 •Co ' F ♦ tl-' laRtfs4 aimyr+ .'fr A /�/` F J rr.,-.r Y �'r�t�;" k•e.ee•mm I .ewoa•e �. _. 4 ��` �' g:�� :;`ter.: A tea e:• 1 yxnu,nK •�imjm ,J •r°mm w •rm. s. ie�°Y• ai+rti +•tom_ ''f' -,{� war �i ��£ 5 :.:i � ^Y' r ��: .. '.. f t• � �,c g y► •f r' � ,• \�' .; ,. S - m �a eve � _�":. 1''`•r y �n]w f J A♦°:R Yvi'f�•° 'vemn ob i....i'°.• 'r` ti PAMUL �:� ,P'' ' •►♦ 's°mom . . p o_" ,. T7� d 11 t ter! 7,a f Adopted July, 2004 :a FINAL EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT SIX LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA Adopted July, 2004 Prepared for. R• CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (909) 674-3124 Prepared by: LAING-CP LAKE ELSINORE LLC 31900 Mission Trail, Suite 225 Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (909) 245-9075 RGP PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 440 Goddard Irvine, CA 92618 (949) 450-0171 FINAL EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT SIX LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA City Approvals: Supplemental Environmental Impact Report • Certified by City Council action, July 27, 2004 • Resolution No. 2004-50 General Plan Amendment No. 2003-04 Adopted by City Council Action, July 27, 2004 Resolution No. 2004-51 Specific Plan Amendment Six • Adopted by City Council action • Ordinance No. 1 126 • First Reading July 27, 2004 • Second Reading, August 24, 2004 Development Agreement (Amended & Restated) • Adopted by City Council action • Ordinance No. 1 127 • First Reading July 27, 2004 • Second Reading, August 24, 2004 Tentative Tract Map No. 31920 • Adopted by City Council action, July 27, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 1. INTRODUCTION I 1 A. Background & Purpose 1-2 B. Project Summary C. Relationship to East Lake SP & Previous Amendments 1-5 D. Organization of the Amendment Document 1-5 E. General Plan/RDA Consistency 1-6 F. Administrative Compliance 1-6 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 11 1 A. Location B. Amendment 6 Characteristics 11-1 1 . Land Use Plan 11-1 2. Circulation Plan 11-3 3. Drainage Plan 11-3 4. Water & Sewer Plans 11-4 5. Dry Utilities Plan 11-4 6. Open Space Plan 11-4 AMENDMENTS TO THE EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN Ill 1 A. Amendments to Section I - Executive Summary B. Amendments to Section 11 - Introduction 111-1 C. Amendments to Section Ill - Relationship to Other Planning Measures III-2 D. Amendments to Section IV - Setting, Opportunities & Constraints 111-4 E. Amendments to Section V - The Plan 111-4 Land Use Districts 111-5 Land Use Plan 111-6 Circulation Plan 111-8 Infrastructure 111-12 Public Services 111-14 Grading Plan 111-14 Open Space Plan 111-16 Project Phasing III-20 F. Amendments to Section VI - Design Guidelines 111-21 G. Amendments to Section V11 - Development Regulations III-25 H. Amendments to Section Vill - Implementation 111-29 I. Amendments to Section IX -- Administration of the Specific Plan 111-29 J. Amendments to Section XI, Specific Plan Appendices 111-30 Appendix A - Governing Statistical Summary Appendix C - Content & Amendment Reference Amendment Six General Plan Amendment East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services LIST OF FIGURES & TABLES FIGURES 1 . Regional Context Following Page 1-1 2. Local Setting Following Page 1-1 3. Amendment Project Area Following Page 1-1 4. Land Use Plan Comparison Following Page 1-2 S. Amendment Land Use Plan Fallowing Page 11-2 6. Land Use Plan Context Following Page II-2 7. ELSP Land Use Plan Following Page II1-1 8. Conceptual District Plan Following Page 111-5 9. Circulation Plan Following Page 111-9 10. Amendment Street Sections Following Page III-10 11 . Conceptual Drainage Plan Following Page I11-1 3 12. Conceptual Water Plan Following Page 111-1 3 13. Conceptual Sewer Plan Following Page 111-1 3 14. Conceptual Dry Utilities Following Page 111-14 15. Conceptual Grading Plan Following Page 111-14 16, Open Space Plan Following Page 111-16 17. Conceptual Landscape Plan Following Page 111-19 18. Conceptual Recreational Center Plan Following Page 111-19 19. Central Neighborhood Park Concept Following Page I11-19 20. Typical Neighborhood Focal Park Concept Following Page III-19 21 . Multi-Use Park & Overflow Parking Concept Following Page III-19 22. Linear Nature Trail Concept Following Page 111-19 23. Amendment Area Phasing Following Page 111-20 24. Diamond Drive Landscape Concept Following Page 111-22 25. Modified Collector Landscape Concept Fallowing Page 111-22 26. Neighborhood Street A Landscape Concept Following Page 111-22 27. Neighborhood Street B Landscape Concept Following Page 111-22 28. Neighborhood Street C Landscape Concept Following Page I11-22 A-1 a & A-1 b Roadway Design Summary Appendix B TABLES 1 . Amendment Area Comparison Following Page 1-2 2. Land Use Revision Summary Following Page 11-1 3. Comparable Acreage Land Use 11-2 4. Community Land Use Summary Following Page 111-1 5. Project Summary Overview 111-2 6 Land Use District Summary Following Page 111-6 7. Dwelling Unit Summary 111-7 8. Open Space Summary 111-18 9. Recreation Facility Summary 111-19 East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC +RGP Planning&Development Services Governing Statistical Table - Amendment Area Following Page I11-31 Governing Statistical Table - Recreation Village Following Page III-31 Governing Statistical Table - East Lake Specific Plan Following Page III-31 East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC +RGP Planning&Development Services East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SIX PREFACE PREFACE This document is an amendment to a portion of the 3,000 acre East Lake Specific Plan which was adopted by the Lake Elsinore City Council in 1993 and subsequently amended in 1998 (SPA-1) and 1999 (SPA-2). This amendment modifies land use and circulation plans for the majority of the area identified as Phase 1 in the East Lake Specific Plan. This same Phase 1 area was the principal focus of both the SPA-1 and SPA-2 amendments. The area of the East Lake Specific Plan addressed by this amendment is referred to as the John Laing Homes Community OLHC) and/or Specific Plan Amendment Six (SPA-6). These names may be used interchangeably in this document. This document is intended to incorporate all changes to the 1993 East Lake Specific Plan (ELSP) resulting from adoption of this SPA-6 amendment and all remaining valid changes to the 1993 ELSP plan resulting from the adoption of the SPA-1 and SPA-2 amendments which have not been superseded by SPA-6. As such, SPA-6 embodies all amendments to the 1993 ELSP plan in one document, and it effectively repeals or eliminates SPA-1 and SPA-2 as separate free-standing documents. Any portions of SPA-1 and/or SPA-2 which have not been explicitly incorporated into this SPA-6 document shall be considered repealed. By so doing, the 1993 ELSP document along with the SPA-6 document constitute the sole regulatory parameters for development within the specific plan area, except where either of these documents is silent on a regulation or procedure. In that case, where the East Lake Specific Plan, as amended, fails to provide guidance, the then current City of Lake Elsinore General Plan and Municipal Code shall prevail, subject to the provisions of any applicable development agreement or similar instrument. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SDC INTRODUCTION I. INTRODUCTION A. Background & Purpose The East Lake Specific Plan (ELSP), originally adopted in 1993, covered a 3,000 acre area at the east end of Lake Elsinore and provided for up to 9,000 dwelling units and a combination of commercial, recreational and open spaces uses. The Specific Plan adopted in 1993 was subsequently amended by a series of Specific Plan Amendments (SPA) as outlined below. This amendment, Amendment Six to the East Lake Specific Plan, affects approximately 706 acres within the central portion of the 3,000 acre East Lake Specific Plan (See Fig. 1 , Regional Context; Fig. 2, Local Setting; and Fig. 3, Amendment Project Area). The amendment redistributes the majority of land uses within the area previously identified as Phase 1 of the East Lake Plan, which was also the focus of SPA-1 & SPA-2. The SPA-2 land use plan represents the currently adopted Specific Plan land uses for the project area, which this amendment (SPA-6) revises. SPA-1 was adopted by the City in 1998 and SPA-2 was adopted in 1999. These two amendments reduced the total residential dwelling unit count for the mixed use specific plan, redistributed land uses within the Phase 1 area, changed standard street profiles to a narrow street system, introduced Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND) design criteria, and modified the methods for implementing regulatory permits. The 1993-adopted East Lake Specific Plan authorized a total dwelling unit count of 9,000 dwellings. SPA-1 and SPA-2 reduced that number to 7,966 dwellings. The 1993 East Lake Specific Plan defined a Phase 1 development area which was located in the central portion of the Plan area, generally south of the proposed Malaga Rd. alignment in the Plan. The SPA-1 amendment redistributed land uses within the majority of the Phase 1 area, and the SPA- 2 amendment again minimally redistributed land uses within this same amendment area. The SPA-1 redistribution of land uses resulted in three principal changes from the 1993 Plan: First, an increase in the percentage of land allocated to open space due to defined Flood storage needs and the consolidation of the Phase One golf course in a more efficient design; Second, a corresponding reduction in residential use acreage and resultant decrease in residential yield for the amendment area; and Third, the creation of a second commercial/mixed-use focal point southerly of Malaga Road. These changes also resulted in a decrease in the overall yield of the entire 3,000 East Lake Specific Plan as indicated above. East Lake Specfflc Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 1-1 Pasadena ' - ,t .. •-, ,,. �__,�� a �...,,.-� z 3;�: , -; ,, i � j..M`•. €..;l )f �� t ._..f 1t s � �. ��an�•�ernardino �`'�� t San Palm r� s i f g 1 Paris Palm rake Springs z s ;gnat errrr ,x ela i �lev rr e e B � ..y. Hemetm Bernardino ,a . J r Ana ► _ i } 3 f E t FS f V + Santa _ l •mod � Canyon 's- � •� "9� Natlaga! Lake Nagonal q' La e. . ( l ; :i t _' . 1 1Elsinore £. Nan%I?o 3 6�!✓)1::::' �� Forest rForest Temecul ...- .. r z s. 4 ::Dana'"'., '_' CampL —' .._,..__ Anza Pendleton Cleveland USMG , ,»...;..:: Bore go -iN t q ,.••_. Desert 'ell Vista >; .;;:A.::•: ,::::�;.:: G.............. .;:.;:Ocean,. eWY'T` =. National Escondido ; w �w 78 O. i fr. 3 j i Fy s i ; i { � t D el Mar Forest 1 tI Cajon on 4 f' <r, ..A�1 D lli G O S Nati onal City n NORTH SCALE: 0�y5 110 lLE3 —iLE S M John Laing Homes East Lake Specific Plan FIGURE 1 REGIONAL CONTEXT _ F...� __ '^.___W.. Sri ........ 5 -j W d '!A �� 74 �� ; ', � r �. p �I rri •�, elt f ��i ¢'rQ`�` r \ .s'y � :�+:�+./ •1,; a" �;��°1,�� )�� w {i+�`" • €h�r.�+l �►„ <+��Y .� +Rx:, � ,� � t ^° .,,c t ear+ r j +��`.7'��F -.-.:,,:t". ITlumt l,.,�„ ,, •0.. �. I s s,• ,� t! E��``�w ¢"� ff �Jtr� e�"'i'• d .}1'R. '�....' ;,�x P..-I`� Il`, y, 4: �� ,:';� iTsm p�+�,'y ''�'•,�` yw'-+�- �'�,.4�rsxa.,,S ��:6�-_ t _"'.•1:n 5<�''w+:..F4='.4 .��y+\A M -., _� � €1�� '^ � t� ,f��S'Z7S��`�f�S ate ;�..y`I�' -�vslr- '"d��b�{�x�#�'�4Jt It,.._ � ' � `--�- �� y �yy.I °,�,j ,� tA� w+•'L �.,, •,° '.�: ,�' '♦<+a9jn,74,:�ca::�.��. .... ,i'.2eh�s�, r; 4 pr •�' yl f 1. 15 �' �•t� G..+�F„wr3,�'fA 89`1 , ..�x vnc v .C9_•-_•__ � �d - 'M f•.Yts f.�'' E_ ..I C �'+rr nr Ajl A ° ., J NATION 3+ As 7,+ ��.• b 11 re--ice. ... r ,°"� 1� � ..✓ / ,..;. if j i F t y ,�,'`'_3. G; /` �e�J a 7�fr q,�+/✓R'q,�f p f -�•{( p F"f 15 i�`Fs �� a�/� � q, /• w:..e '�� 4 f 4 ��-.71 R�4'_�t 'f�_ I ¢I��.,.•�.a' R �r_a.-. ----�----.._._......._..-__' -----._._. !_r.'•''o�. '. k t r .. -- '�'—rs ,c"s• s� +�d�s'�Iyr � i € w1 r' , • �NarerPow te /r.t`I+ ; s: I i NORTH SCALE: 0 .5 1 MILES John Laing Homes East Lake Specific Plan FIGURE 2 LOCAL SETTING 1WnwE v " i t�f t 2`�'1-'`4,•t 1 < (' x f t' z hu �:�QV r i _.. *10 7 ` � 3 4 Y 11 1 1 46 � ! 'I LAKE i I , l t: �r , i pP` E.N D M A AM ♦, M, AREAEast Lake Specific Plan BoundaryVIP— ! � ? Y�*♦ fit...... . *% iZ SPECIFIC PLAN ARE �y f I,a t� N O R T H John Laing Homes SCALE: East Lake Specific Plan FIGURE 3 MILES AMENDMENT PROJECT AREA East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SIX INTRODUCTION SPA-2 changes resulted in a small increase in the amendment area residential yield, but SPA-2's principal change was the addition of traditional neighborhood design (TND) standards to the East Lake Specific Plan as an optional set of standards for project development. These TND standards and design guidelines were intended to accommodate the implementation of traditional neighborhood designs as an optional form of development, not a required form of development. Table 1 , Amendment Area Comparison and Fig. 4, Land Use Plan Comparison, illustrate the approximate distribution of land uses and residential yield in the Amendment Six (SPA-6) area compared to the same basic area of the previously adopted East Lake Specific Plan and SPA-2 amendments. Appendix B also provides an additional summary of the 1993 East Lake Specific Plan and subsequent SPA-1 and SPA-2 changes as well as an ELSP content and amendment summary matrix. The matrix indicates the location of the various specific plan content areas and their respective amendments. B. Project Summary SPA-6 primarily focuses on a new land use distribution for the majority of the formerly named Phase 1 area, which is now referred to as the John Laing Homes Community OLHC) area. It also proposes a modification to the adopted dwelling unit count for the entire specific plan (a slight increase to 7,975 dwellings which is within the originally adopted 9,000 dwellings) and additionally, an abandonment of the narrowed Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND) street standards adopted in SPA-2, and a return to a more conventional architectural style and community design. The Amendment Six area dwelling unit count comprises 1 ,955 of the 7,975 total units. The reconfiguration of land uses in SPA-6 brings the land use pattern and relative allocation of area between development and open space more into line with the original 1993 East Lake Specific Plan land use approval for this area. Changes in land use allocation from the 1993 Specific Plan to SPA-2 to SPA-6 are shown in Table 1 and are summarized as follows: Residential Use SPA-6 residential acreage increases from SPA-2 residential acreage but the resultant unit count is still 33% below the ELSP unit count for the same area (2,914 units in 1993 approval versus 1 ,955 units in SPA-6). The SPA-6 residential acreage results from a more conventional single family detached development concept that is lower in intensity than the SPA-2 development concept, and more in keeping with the City of Lake Elsinore development character. Thus, East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Osinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 1-2 A ®tr) W k � E (0U) � K � k u � 5) / y & E / 0 � � � � % C \ � � - 7 % 0 2 q u \ E � 2 ] to a a � o ■ / � / / a / O � W vco Ln cc:)) t _ V ® # I m � m t q m \ � Q 04 1w N k � w 0 CO _ 2 \ z z C N 0 w Q CL E � o ■ / ¥ @ / - / G C � % � � $ % Rq % ¥ o 77 �j 2 \ W ® � 2aP (D CV) w mLo 2 } G k0 ■ $ \ of & rA CL CD a m kE (Dr_0 © § � « UFO « z PC TTfR wF ,1 I'OTTE 6T POTTERY T VN 2 `oS�otfoR ti� QK6srioNE LaKFSMOREOR RD pQ R1 R1 R1 R2 ® R3 R2 R3 R2 R3 R2 L R2 AIU S CP R1 GC CIP R1 06 GC GC CP R1 s R1 GC C RJ R1 RJ R1 os R1 R1 ,,, R1 os R1 os Os SAu`L R1 os 6 STAG UN C6 MU 6TAADIL AREA GC cP R1 R2 Mu GC OPg� CP Rt R2 OS OS GC oP5< CP R1 R2 0 GC �oPs CP MPAA CP QS GC GC � Mp,1T CP OS R3 SAu R1 R1 CS MP R1 R4 RJ R R1 os R OS 6AREAM � R1 R1 R1 R3 u R2 os R3 R1 R1 R1 R3 02 R1 oc R1 Rt R1 as R1 R1 R1 Os R1 os R1 O OS os r OS R1 f Rt R1 R3 R1 s R1 R1 R2 OS R1 R3 R3 W g R1 as R2 R OS o as R1 R1 RZ R1 R1 R3 R2 st OS R1 R3 R2 s 3 �N R1 / as R1 R1 as R1 R1 OS R1 OS 1 S Og OS OS as R3 OS R3 R1 S R3 R1 R3 OS R. GC OS R3 GC OS R3 GC R2 R2 O A R1 R2 R1 R2 Os R1 R2 OS R 3 R2 AUA AUA R2 AUA R2 AIRPORT A USEAREA, OS IRPORT A,RPCRT U�-pvy,, I/SEAREA Os SEAREA as CAryVCN 1 �YCF'fYON RD �ry CF!NCN U C PO 0, C49 C,L�H R1 �? RatioN Pi 9iF R1 � R1 �r� H�F R1 \ R2 R2 R2 1993 EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN SPA - 2 SPA - 6 LEGEND GENERAL COMMERCIAL NORTH SCALE:NTS CP COMMERCIAL PARK MU MIXED USE os OPEN SPACE WATER John Laing Homes RES-1 RESIDENTIALI (upto6DU/AC) East Lake Specific Plan REs-2 RESIDENTIAL 2 (up to 14 Du IAC) FIGURE 4 RES-3 RESIDENTIAL 3(up tOz2DuiAc) SCHOOL SITE EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN - AMENDMENT SIX REs4 RESIDENTIAL 4(up to 30 DU iAC) AUA I AIRPORT USE AREA o$ OPEN SPACE sAu SPECIAL ALTERNATIVE USE LAND USE PLAN COMPARISON East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SD( INTRODUCTION although residential acreage increases somewhat, overall residential density in SPA-6 goes down relative to both SPA-2 and the East lake Specific Plan. Commercial Use SPA-6 commercial/mixed-use acreage decreases relative to both SPA-2 and the ELSP. The reduction of commercial and mixed-use acreage from SPA-6 is consistent with the SPA-6 development concept of a conventional single family detached residential neighborhood centered around school and recreational uses. This change also supports the ELSP concept for the Phase 1 area which focused commercial activities north of Malaga Road along Diamond Drive. Open Spaces Use SPA-6 open space acreage is consistent with the ELSP Recreation Village development concept as well as the Lake management Plan flood storage requirements. The allocation of open space acreage has decreased somewhat relative to SPA-2 but has increased approximately 40% over the ELSP allocation for Phase 1 open space (232 acres in 1993 approval versus 329 acres in SPA-6). The SPA-6 area consists of the 706-acre property known locally as the Lehr Option property, plus several City owned parcels. Figure 1 depicts the City of Lake Elsinore in regional context. Figure 2 indicates the location of the property within the City limits and highlights a few of the existing land uses near the subject property. Figure 3 illustrates the SPA-6 Amendment's area location at the southerly terminus of Diamond Drive, south of Malaga, westerly of Mission Trail, and east of the Lake. SPA-6 identifies a planned community development concept of conventional design employing enhanced public street designs and alignments, contemporary architecture, and amenities consistent with planned community standards, This development concept is comprised mainly of single family detached residential development at densities up to 6 units per acre. This type of development is consistent with the character of the City of Lake Elsinore as a whole. Residential development will be integrated with a variety of open space and recreational amenities along with provision for an elementary school site as a focal point of the community. Expanded landscaped parkway streets and recreational amenities maintained by Home Owner Associations or other similar maintenance entities will ensure a high level of quality will be maintained throughout the community. The 706-acre SPA-6 area is proposed to consist of approximately 23 separate planning areas as shown in Figure 5, Amendment Six Land Use Plan. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC a RGP Planning&Development Services 1-3 East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SD( INTRODUCTION Planning Areas intended for development consist primarily of residential components. Each of these planning areas will be developed with single family detached housing consistent with the densities and dwelling unit limits depicted in Table 2. Specific residential product mix will be detailed in subsequent applications and submittals as required by City regulations. In addition to the residential components within each of the planning areas, SPA-6 includes the option to include public and private recreation facilities and structures, a public school site, neighborhood parks and open space. Non-residential uses planned or provided for in this area include a public elementary school, public parks, a privately owned-public use 18-hole regulation golf course and club house, driving range, maintenance facilities, parking facilities (including "stadium overflow parking), parks, flood storage, multi-purpose trails and open space buffers. The westerly portion of the SPA-6 area will be preserved as open space and recreational uses for flood storage, and includes the historic alignment of the San Jacinto River. Within this area SPA-6 will implement flood storage and habitat restoration measures as required by existing permits issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. For this reason, this portion of the JLHC area will not contain any habitable structures, and it is from this area that dirt will be cut and used to build up the residential Planning Areas to raise those areas above elevation 1266 (msl). This is the lowest elevation upon which habitable structures are allowed to be built. The entire SPA-6 area of the specific plan proposes a maximum of 1 ,955 dwelling units in four "villages", dispersed throughout the Planning Areas above the 1266 elevation. Implementation of the proposed SPA-6 area development program also requires an amendment to the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Circulation Element. This results from the fact that SPA 2 included the City's approval of a Circulation Element amendment to reduce the width of the southerly extension of Diamond Drive from the City's standard width of 100-feet down to 70-feet. Further, the amendment recognized a previous applicant's desire to align the roadway differently than depicted in the General Plan. Implementation of the John Laing Homes development program will seek permission for a return to the General Plan designation of Diamond Drive as a 4 lane Major Highway. Fast Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 1-4 East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SIX INTRODUCTION C. Relationship to the East Lake Specific Plan & Previous Amendments Amendment Six supersedes the adopted SPA-2 land use designations for the designated areas and the alignment and design standard for Diamond Drive south of Malaga Dr. It also supersedes identified portions of the East Lake Specific Plan text relating to design guidelines and development standards. The Amendment Six document along with the East Lake Specific Plan provide regulations, standards and criteria with which subsequent project level development plans, subdivision maps, and building permits or any other action requiring ministerial or discretionary approval must comply. SPA-6, as well as its two amendment predecessors, does not contain all sections of the adopted East Lake Specific Plan, only those sections amended or added to the previously approved 1993 document. In order to simplify implementation of this Specific Plan, the sections of SPA-1 and SPA-2 which have not been superseded have been incorporated into the SPA-6 document. For ease of administration, this results in only two documents containing all approved plans and regulations regarding development within the overall 3,000 acre Specific Plan area: The 1993 ELSP and SPA-6 documents. Appendix 8 of this document is intended to provide a contextual reference for the current SPA-6 amendment and to provide guidance to find the applicable document for the various topical areas of the East Lake Specific Plan, as it has been amended in a serial fashion. This guidance is provided via the matrix within Appendix B which identifies the various topical sections of the East Lake Specific Plan, and within which document they can be found. The matrix is organized by the major chapters or sections of the 1993 ELSP. D. Organization of the Amendment Document This Amendment document is organized into three principal sections, briefly described as follows: INTRODUCTION: This section describes the background of the 1993 ELSP adoption and subsequent amendments including the relation of the SPA-6 amendment to the previous Specific Plan approvals. This document is intended to incorporate all remaining valid amendments to the 1993 Plan from the SPA-1 and SPA-2 actions which have not been superseded by SPA-6. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This section describes the current amendment components and characteristics. AMENDMENTS TO THE EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN: This section describes the SPA-6 amendments in relation to each of the 1993 ELSP document sections. As an amendment to the ELSP, the SPA-6 document East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC +RGP Planning&Development Services 1-5 East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENTS INTRODUCTION addresses each section of the ELSP to define what portion or portions of that section are amended. This section is organized as follows: 1 . A brief summary of the ELSP section is provided; 2. Areas of amendment within the section are identified; and 3. The amendment description/wording/exhibits are provided. E. General Plan/Redevelopment Plan Consistency SPA-6 is consistent with the goals and objectives of the East Lake Specific Plan. This amended plan continues to provide for a range of housing types, a variety of recreational uses, and the preservation and/or enhancement of open space and special habitats. An amendment to the City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element (GPA) has been requested in conjunction with SPA-6. Approval of the GPA will designate Diamond Drive between Malaga and Bundy Canyon Drive again as a Major Street but with a modified street section. Accordingly, the SPA-6 amendment continues to be consistent with the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, as noted in Section 3.1 of the adopted East Lake Specific Plan, by virtue of this amendments consistency with the East Lake Specific Plan and the adoption of the concurrent GPA regarding Diamond Drive. The project area lies within an adopted Redevelopment Project Area. SPA-6 is a pre-development requirement under the City of Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency's Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) adopted by the Agency in December 2002 for the East Lake Specific Plan area. The primary purpose of the DDA is to define the `developer' responsibilities and performance expectations to provide public benefits as an integral part of the development plan. The SPA-6 amendment is consistent with the adopted DDA. F. Administrative Compliance The SPA-6 amendment is accompanied by a project level Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) which addresses the focused impacts of the proposed project. This SEIR has been prepared in conformance with the most recently adopted CEQA guidelines of the State of California. The SEIR addresses environmental conditions on the project site, assesses impacts of project implementation and sets out mitigation measures to minimize or eliminate identified project impacts. The SEIR preparation effort includes the preparation of a Mitigation Monitoring Plan in accordance with CEQA requirements. East Lake Speck Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 1-6 East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SIX INTRODUCTION The SEIR serves as the required environmental documentation for this Specific Plan Amendment, concurrent General Plan Amendment, and subsequent individual development proposals within the amendment area. It is intended that the project SEIR address the mitigation requirements of all future individual development projects processed in conformance with the East lake Specific Plan and the SPA-6 amendment. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services i-7 East Lake Specffc Plan AMENDMENT SIX PROJECT DESCRIPTION II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Regional & Local Setting The East Lake Specific Plan is located in the City of Lake Elsinore, in the southwest portion of Riverside County, as shown in Figure 1 , Regional Context. The East Lake Plan area is accessed from Interstate 15 by major roadways including Diamond Drive and Bundy Canyon Road. Figure 2, Local Setting, illustrates the location of the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment area with respect to the rest of the City of Lake Elsinore. SPA-6 comprises 706.7 acres in the central portion of the East Lake Specific Plan. The SPA-6 area is generally bounded by Malaga Road on the north, Mission Trail on the east, and the future Bundy Canyon Road alignment on the south, and is depicted in Figure 3, Amendment Project Area. B. Amendment Six Characteristics This Amendment consolidates and reconfigures previously approved land uses under SPA-2. This reconfiguration of land uses brings the land use pattern and allocation of open space and development area more in line with the original 1993 East Lake Specific Plan approval for this area. In comparison to the East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment Six decreases the amount of area allocated to development from 60% to 48% and increases the amount of area allocated to open space from 33% to 47%. As a result, the average density decreases from 8.7 units/acre in the 1993 plan to 6.0 units/acre in Amendment Six. Table 2 presents the acreage allocation and density changes from the 1993 East Lake Specific Plan to Amendment Six. The revisions in the land use designations are intended to facilitate a planned community development of conventional design employing standard public street designs, contemporary architecture, and amenities consistent with planned community standards. Amendment Six includes a conceptual Land Use Plan, Circulation Plan, Drainage, Water & Sewer Plans, and an Open Space Plan. The following sub- sections describe the components of Amendment Six and compares them to the 1993 East Lake Specific Plan and to SPA 2, the currently approved plan for this amendment area. Section III.D of this Amendment provides details regarding each plan. 1. Land Use Plan Amendment Six re-designates land uses within the 706 acre portion of the East Lake Specific Plan depicted in Figure 5, Amendment Six Land Use Plan. Figure 6, Land Use Plan Context, shows the SPA-6 uses in relation to current surrounding land uses. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services II-1 m � o 0. Q 0 ~ o o \ d O V (Uo p tipc C , � Q � C., Ln o T c Gil CD Q M ti Q V) Z 3 ttA C° > a � pujC y 0 � LJ.1 Lnca 04 Q J � � z Q Q V � MMN � �" O O z Q N N c a� X ai y ro o a� V'1 FRG y o z w lJ.l p r ti N CM O a N N aci z afOi � -.-0 0, Q M _ gQ r � � N ON N _ 7 V1 N ~ w V M M N N � LO Q c fd i V m P 0- 0 E ca o0 cn � � V o ,K �V) frl- °: r � v � 0 0 East Lake Speck Plan AMENDMENT SD( PROJECT DFSCR1PT10N Table 3, Comparable Acreage Land Use Breakdown, provides a side by side comparison of the Amendment Six Land Use Plan and the land use plan for the same area of the adopted East Lake Specific Plan and SPA-2. TABLE 3 Comparable Acreage Land Use Breakdown Land Use ELSP SPA 2 SPA 6 (acres) (acres) (acres) Residential 128 120 326.3 RESIDENTIAL Residential 121 73 0 Residential 50 19 0 Residential 4 12 0 0 School 0 0 ' Subtotal 311 212 326.3 General 31 31 11 .7 COMMERCIAL Commercial Mixed use 24 30 0 Special Alt. Use 58.5 0 0 Subtotal 173.5 6111.7 OPEN SPACE Open Space/Parks 232 412 329 ■ Golf Course ■ Multi-use park ■ Neighborhood Parks (4) ■ San Jacinto River Corridor ■ Open Space Buffer ROADS Roads 50.2 21 .7 39.7 TOTALI 706.7 706.7 706.7 Note: 13 acres for a school site included in 326.3 acre residential designation area. Amendment Six contains 326.3 acres of residential development and 329 acres of open space and parks within the 706 acre area covered by this Amendment. The Amendment Six land use plan embodies a greater emphasis on conventional single family residential development rather than the relatively small lot, Traditional Neighborhood Design envisioned in SPA-2. This return to more conventional residential design is more consistent with the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 11-2 r AMEND IX SPEC' IC PLAN AREA MENT \ AREA BOU . +c------ --1_ RY O.S. 00-1 --_ ® 010 / O.S. i� ♦ / O.S./35 38 RES-1 RES-1 / / Q21 / / / 61 DOW O S� oe/ /�O.S. O C 0 / v O.S. �/ 34 RES-1 O RES-1 O.S. \ I i 44l O O.S. I /® �.� RES-1 39 / r MSchool RES-1 RES-1 ®O.S. Q , y v� �. - O.S.—A' 40 may+ 40 RES-1 0.1 RES-1 ------------- LEGEND RES1 RESIDENTIAL 1 (up to 6 DU IAC) 1� I GENERAL COMMERCIAL I os OPEN SPACE ; ---- John Laing Homes NORTH East Lake Specific Plan SCALE:NTS FIGURE 5 EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN - AMENDMENT SIX LAND USE PLAN ��• fry i it, !� _ i- _ "Z 3f;- � yp .V ti a}' 1�,� .. t Y � �_ 'G DoWntown'Lake Elsinore � •l�' � 4 1. t'.4...�. -}'n1 r /. -. .� . f � �•� ir,. Y �L• � j R, •f .Av. +. r--� r - 't f. `� ;� � S C4ltifS�3'jI , , ttYYtt .lac�h' ;JAj1�. ;, " _ 7. {yy*, ty �'i { - `.. Ir ~ �i• .p..•._ /��tj +tit ilo \.♦ , ti��. •R'�VitJ � J ►•. Railroad Canyon Rd. Vacant15) �r T ��` 4f •N Lake Elsinore t Baseball ��F '•* Stadium Commercial t. CsJ' r �. Vacant �M — .4 F�+ ~• '`\ 7 - ,1 "y „.,,"I;,�' r.\r.. s Wetland Residential 1 s4,;r r Mitigation Area • fi ;' 4 1�. Y t Ir,# ; ' . ! Motocross? �� 1 t { Track ' - r ' Residential , :� _ 7 „� v. •� � { .� ��r.. ..s /• 1�111111 1"'�. .Lt +..., .; S+4�t+`+UlyyiY+C 7. '�t. 't•.,� 4 j'. ��.1 ✓ t '•{ .:11,y .r•. a r Si` i ." �`O f�3 ��t • �+ ni.. �•. �r i � ..�� „ t�,.� k : � x � tf• ...,,,w, ��• +.'; �-, R 'r �- :ice' � r Li ht4lndustrial a Santa Ana Mts./Cleveland National Forest r •�' ''� �.� _ ,� �p;f � �� _ t ._ - �• X: ly. .1 � "•+ :_ It �." _ � i� wfi+��t S�ice` ,� I, 000 1,000 • 2,000 Feet �* <K. 4 Residential N' ONEEK aid ..�! .r l�. :�: 2ri IG.�rf• °y K \. ,�. �,� .�- :: —,' a� East Lake Speck Plan AMENDMENT SIX PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1993 East Lake Specific Plan. As indicated in Table 2, the relative increase in the area allocated to open space from the 1993 Plan along with a decrease in the density of proposed residential products has resulted in the residential density of Amendment Six, 6.0 units/acre, going down relative to the 1993 residential density of 8.7 units/acre. The other principal change from the SPA-2 land use plan is the reduction of commercial and mixed-use uses within Amendment Six. The 326.3 acre portion of the plan designated for residential development includes a 13 acre site proposed for an elementary school in the center of the development area. it will ultimately be up to the school district to determine if this site is one they want to acquire for future school development. if they do not elect to acquire this site it will be developed at a residential density consistent with the underlying RESA land use designation and a tentative subdivision map will have to be approved to further subdivide this parcel. For a detailed breakdown of Amendment Six land use by Planning Areas shown in Figure 5, Amendment Six Land Use Plan, refer to Section III J, Amendments to Appendix A, Governing Statistical Summary. 2. Circulation Plan Amendment Six results in minor modifications to the major street and collector system as adopted in SPA-2. The modifications are adapted to the planned land use development plan for the Amendment Six area, while still providing connections to the circulation network in the surrounding portions of the East Lake Specific Plan which are not a part of Amendment Six. A collector connection to Mission Trail is part of the modifications, however, this connection is consistent with the SPA-2 circulation network but in a slightly revised alignment. The Diamond Drive modifications are primarily to the street section design which widen the travel lanes in keeping with the General Plan Major Street designation and also add expanded landscaped shoulders, but also correct the off-set in the Diamond Drive alignment at Malaga Road as adopted in SPA-2. The modified network implements the City's General Plan Circulation Element, as amended concurrently with this Specific Plan amendment, by integrating project area arterial and collector circulation with the existing and planned street network. Refer to East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 11-3 East Lake Speck Plan AMENDMENT S1X PROJECT DESCRIPTION Section III.E.2 of this Amendment for further discussion of the Circulation Plan. 3. Drainage Plan Amendment Six proposes minor changes to the Drainage Plan adopted in SPA-1 . These minor changes are necessary to accommodate the redistribution of land uses and a modified street pattern within the amendment area. Amendment Six also proposes the use of multiple storm drain outfalls through water quality biof'iltration swales into "water quality natural treatment system basins" (retention basins) within the open space portion of the project area. All standards established by the Drainage Plan for the East Lake Specific Plan shall apply to Amendment Six. Refer to Section III.E.3 of this Amendment for further discussion of the Drainage Plan. 4. Water & Sewer Plans Amendment Six proposes minor changes to the Water and Sewer Plans adopted in SPAR . Minor refinements to these plans are necessary to accommodate the redistribution of land uses and street patterns. All standards for water and sewer plans established by the East Lake Specific Plan shall apply to Amendment Six. Refer to Section III.E.3 of this Amendment for further discussion of the Water and Sewer Plans. S. Dty Utilities Plan Amendment Six proposes minor changes to the Dry Utilities Plan adopted in SPA-1 . Minor refinements to the plan are necessary to accommodate the redistribution of land uses. All standards established for Dry Utilities by the East Lake Specific Plan shall apply to Amendment Six. Refer to Section III.E.3 of this Amendment for further discussion of the Dry Utilities Plan. 6. Open Space Plan Amendment Six reconfigures land uses in the amendment area to increase total open space from the adopted 1993 East Lake Specific Plan by approximately 40%. The location of open space is consistent with SPA-2, flanking both sides of the San Jacinto River course, and Amendment Six includes developed open space and natural open space, as did the original East Lake Specific Plan. Developed open space provides active and passive recreational opportunities, while natural open space areas create, preserve and East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC +RGP Planning Wevelopment Services 11-4 East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SW PROJECT DESCRIPTION enhance the natural environmental features of the project area. These areas include the following: • Multi-use Park • 4 Neighborhood parks • 18 hole Golf Course • San Jacinto River Corridor • Natural Open Space Buffer Refer to Section III.E.6 of this Amendment for further discussion of the Open Space Plan. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 11-5 East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SIX SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS III. AMENDMENTS TO THE EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN This section describes the SPA-6 amendments in relation to each of the 1993 ELSP document sections. As an amendment to the ELSP, the SPA-6 document addresses each section of the ELSP to define what portion or portions of that section are amended. This section is organized as follows: 1 . A brief summary of the ELSP section is provided; 2. Areas of amendment within the section are identified; and 3. The amendment description/wording/exhibits are provided. Those portions of the SPA-1 and SPA-2 amendments which have not been superseded by SPA-6 are also incorporated in this section, and where they occur they are so noted for reference. Each part of a chapter and/or sub- section where changes occur is explicitly mentioned. If no reference is made to a Part or sub-section, no change is proposed by Amendment Six. The core concepts established in the East Lake Specific Plan remain unchanged by this amendment. Amendment Six modifications are proposed to create a more conventional and market responsive development plan for the first phase of development. A. Amendments to Section I - Executive Summary ELSP Summary_ This section of the ELSP provides a brief summary of the key points of the specific plan. Area of Amendment Table 1 A, the overall ELSP land use statistical summary, and Figure 1 C, Land Use Plan. Discussion The following Table 4, Revised Table lA and Figure 7, ELSP Land Use plan (Revised Figure 1 Q, depict the overall plan summary as amended to reflect the revisions due to the SPA-6 land use plan. B. Amendments to Section 11 - Introduction ELSP Summary This section of the ELSP cites the authority and scope of the ELSP, provides a brief summary of the Plan, and a project area historical East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 111-1 TABLE 4 COMMUNITY LAND USE SUMMARY (Table ]A, ELSP) LAND USE ACRES Residential Residential 1 855.8 Residential 2 299 Residential 3 102 Residential 4 0 Subtotal 1,256.8' Commercial General Commercial 94.7 Mixed Use 35 Commercial Park 31 Airport Use Area 197 Subtotal 357.7 Special Alternative Use Subtotal 19 Open Space Wetland Mitigation Area 356 Marina 26.5 Park 268.2 Lake 10 Golf Course 280 Multi-Habitat Corridor 200.8 Sports Park 0 Natural Open Space 55 Subtotal 1,196.5 Roads 170 TOTAL 3,000 Note: Includes acreage for Elementary and Middle School sites. East Lake Speck Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC•RGP Planning&Development Services POTTER ST. h HOR,-DR 9s �RST9 �O lF -Po �S R1 R2 R3 os R2 Os MU os GC G °P R1 R1 R1 R1 os os 3AU STADIUM AREA GC °P R1 R2 OS GC MP`AoPSt OS cP R2 ° R1 R1 R1 R1 OS b R1 R1 2 R1 R1 OS os OS °s R1 R1 R1 s `U? R1 R1 R3 R2 St OS R1 R1 �N OS OS R1 R1 OS OS R1 OS R3 R3 GC OS R2 R1 R2 OS R R2 AUA LEGEND USREARPO REA OS e �01'OANYON RD cc GENERAL COMMERCIAL 10001 cP COMMERCIAL PARK Mu MIXED USE cR'tia R1 ,ro os OPEN SPACE WATER R1 R2 RES-1 RESIDENTIAL (upto6DU/AC) RES-2 RESIDENTIAL 2 (up to to DU/AC) RES-3 RESIDENTIAL 3(up to22DU/AC) SCHOOL SITE REsa RESIDENTIAL4(upto3ODUTAC) AuA AIRPORT USE AREA os OPEN SPACE sAu SPECIAL ALTERNATIVE USE John Laing Homes East Lake Specific Plan NORTH FIGURE 7 'GALE:NTS EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE PLAN East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SIX SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS summary. The goals and policies of the Plan are set out and the Specific Plan and concurrent document preparation process is outlined. Area of Amendment Table 113, Project Summary Overview. Discussion The only change to Part II of the Specific Plan is to Table 1 B, Project Summary Overview, to reflect the aggregate changes in the East Lake Specific Plan land uses and land use acreage as a result of the change in distribution of land uses within the Amendment Six area. The amended Table 1 B is presented below as Table S in this Amendment. TABLE 5 PROJECT SUMMARY OVERVIEW Land Use Category Acres % of Dwelling Total Acres Units Residential 1 ,256.8 42 7,692 Commercial 357.7 12 283' Special Alternative Use 19 0.5 Open Space 1 ,196.5 40 Master-Planned Roads 170 5.55 3,000 100 7,975 Note: ' Dwelling units located in Mixed-use areas. C. Amendments to Section III - Relationship to Other Planning Measures ELSP Summa This section of the ELSP provides a Specific Plan-General Plan consistency analysis, a Specific Plan-Redevelopment Plan consistency analysis, and explains how the ELSP relates to and implements the Lake Elsinore Management Project. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services III-2 East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SIX SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS Area of Amendment No amendments proposed Discussion 1. General Plan Consistent Amendment Six does not propose, nor effect, any change to the spirit or function of the Specific Plan that would invalidate the established consistency balance between the Specific Plan and the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan achieved through earlier City Council findings and actions associated with the approval of the original East Lake Specific Plan and SPA-1 & SPA-2. An amendment to the City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element (GPA) has been requested in conjunction with SPA-f. Approval of the GPA will designate Diamond Drive between Malaga and Bundy Canyon Drive again as a Major Highway, consistent with the General Plan, but with a modified street section. The amended Plan continues to provide for a range of housing types, tourist-oriented uses, commercial activities, and a variety of recreational and open space uses. Accordingly, the Plan as amended, along with the adoption of the concurrent GPA regarding Diamond Drive, continues to be consistent with the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan as noted in Section 3.1 of the East Lake Specific Plan. 2. Redevelopment Plan Consistenn Similar to the General Plan consistency discussion above, Amendment Six does not propose, nor effect, any change to the spirit or function of the Specific Plan that would invalidate the established consistency balance between the Specific Plan and the City of Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Plan objectives achieved through earlier City Council findings and actions associated with the approval of the original East Lake Specific Plan and SPA-1 & SPA -2. Amendment Six is a pre-development requirement of the Redevelopment Agency's current Disposition and Development Agreement, adopted by the Agency in December 2002 for the East Lake Specific Plan area. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC f RGP Planning&Development Services 111-3 East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SDC SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS D. Amendments to Section IV - Setting, Opportunities & Constraints ELSP Summary This section of the ELSP provides an overview of the project area setting and physical conditions, and outlines the development opportunities and constraints which the Plan must take into consideration. Area of Amendment No amendments proposed. Discussion Amendment Six is wholly within the legal description and planning boundary of the 1993 adopted East Lake Specific Plan. No significant change to the physical, environmental or jurisdictional setting has occurred within that area. The opportunities and constraints offered by the project site are documented in the adopted East Lake Specific Plan and subsequent amendments (SPA-1 & 2), and the Final Environmental Impact Report and subsequent environmental documentation prepared to address these subjects. No changes have occurred to the setting, opportunities, or site constraints, and therefore further discussion is not warranted in this document. E. Amendments to Section V - The Plan ELSP Summary This section of the ELSP provides a detailed description of each major component of the Plan, including the following: land use plan, circulation plan, drainage plan, water & sewer plans, public services, grading plan, open space plan, conservation, project phasing, and maintenance responsibilities. The land use component provides land use district descriptions as well as descriptions fore each major land use category within the Plan. Each component of the Plan contains both a plan description and development standards applying to that plan component. Areas of Amendment SPA-6 incorporates changes to each of the Plan components within the SPA-6 amendment area only, to reflect the revised SPA-6 land use East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC +RGP Planning& Development Services 111-4 East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SIX SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS development concept. The overall ELSP phasing plan is not changed but phasing within the SPA-6 area is added to the Plan. Amendments from SPA-1 & SPA-2 which have not been superseded are added here relating to Land Use District descriptions and to Grading Development Standards. Discussion This section amends the Development Plans Section of the East Lake Specific Plan applicable to the Amendment Six area, reflecting modifications to Section 5.1 of the East Lake Specific Plan. The adopted Specific Plan and subsequent SPA-1 & 2 amendments included conceptual plans for Land Use, Circulation, Drainage, Water & Sewer, Dry Utilities, Grading, and Open Space within the Phase 1 development area as defined in the ELSP. This section includes discussion and conceptual plan exhibits illustrating amendments to these plans for the SPA-6 area, which constitutes the majority of the original Phase 1 area. SPA-1 also incorporated revisions to the Land Use District descriptions contained in Section 5.1 .1 .b of the ELSP. These revisions are incorporated here. Land Use Districts, 5.1.1.b (incorporated from SPA-1) The ELSP includes three distinct districts reflecting the goal of creating three distinct communities within the ELSP. The districts provide opportunities for the integration of the communities through urban design, circulation, recreational trails and amenities, and land use distribution. Each district is intended to feature a distinct focus or identity. The three districts in the ELSP are named the Marina District, Lakeside Resort, and Recreation Village. SPA-1 modifies the boundaries of the districts so that the entire SPA-1 area is within the Recreation Village. SPA-1 broadens the description of the Recreation Village district to reflect certain uses allowed under the SPA-1 amendment. The descriptions of the other districts as set forth in Section 5.1 .1 .b of the adopted ELSP remain unchanged. Figure 8, Conceptual District Plan, illustrates the boundary changes to the Recreation Village and the adjacent Marina District with respect to the entire ELSP. The Recreation Village has been expanded to the north and northeast to encompass the SPA-1 project area, while the adjacent Marina District has been amended to reflect the expanded area of the Recreation Village. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 11I-5 ,•ti MARINA DISTRICT + MARINA DISTRICT VQ AW �+ LAKESIDE RESORT RECREATION . DISTRICT VILLAGE DISTRICT � . 4 �ti 1� JON n NORTH John Laing Homes SCALE: East Lake Specific Plan .6 ---i FIGURE 8 MILES CONCEPTUAL DISTRICT PLAN East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SD( SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS The revised description of the Recreation Village is presented below and shall apply to the whole of the Recreation Village. Table 6, Land Use District Summary, presents a summary of land uses among the Districts as compared to the adopted ELSP. This summary shows that the Lakeside Resort remains unchanged, while the Marina District and Recreation Village have been adjusted in size by 312.5 acres. The Recreation Village consists of approximately 1 ,799 acres and is located in the southeastern portion of the community. The Recreation Village is designed to provide housing opportunities for those who enjoy a recreational or leisure lifestyle. The Recreation Village provides a mix of entertainment, recreation, shopping, cultural, business and housing opportunities for its residents. Along with the multi-habitat corridor, the recreational aspect of this village if further enhanced by the provision of a golf course, parks, and an entertainment center. Development Plan revisions to the Amendment Six area are described below. 1. Land Use Plan Amendment Six includes the following land uses: a. Residential Uses Amendment Six slightly increases the acreage of residential development within the Amendment Six area over that provided in the 1993 approval, and deletes the Mixed-Use category which contained a residential yield. These changes result in both an increase in acreage and residential yield over the SPA 2 land use plan but bring the residential acreage and yield more in line with the 1993 East Lake Specific Plan approval. Based on target densities, it is projected that the Amendment Six area, at build-out, will contain a maximum of 1 ,955 dwelling units on 326.3 acres. These yields and acres are similar but still less dense than the 1993 East Lake Specific Plan approval of 2,914 units on 335 acres respectively for basically the same area. The 326.3 acre portion of the plan designated for residential development also includes a 13 acre site proposed for an elementary school in the center of the development area. It is ultimately up to the school district to determine if this site is one they want to acquire for future school development. If they do not elect to acquire this site it will be developed at a residential density consistent with the underlying RES-1 land use designation. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC +RGP Planning&Development Services III-6 TABLE 6 LAND USE DISTRICT SUMMARY' Marina District Lakeside Resort Recreation Village Total (acres) (acres) (aeresf (acres) Land Use Amended Adopted Amended Ado ted Amended Adopted Amended Adopted Residential 175 217 102 102 578.8 348.5 855.8 667.5 Residential 103 181 0 0 196 237 299 418 Residential 33 61 0 0 69 83 102 144 Residential 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 12 General 9 92 0 0 85.7 34 94.7 126 Commercial Mixed Use 35 60 0 0 0 0 35 60 Airport Use Area 0 0 0 0 197 197 197 197 Commercial Park 0 0 31 31 0 0 31 31 Wetland Mitigation 0 0 356 356 0 0 356 356 Area Open S ace 0 0 0 0 175.8 0 175.8 0 Natural O.S. 0 0 33 33 22 22 55 55 Marina 18.5 18.5 8 8 0 0 26.5 26.5 Park 94 109.5 92 92 82.2 10 268.2 211.5 Lake 8 31 2 2 0 0 10 33 Golf Course 0 0 0 0 280 176 280 176 Multi-habitat 0 6 0 0 25 221 25 227 Corridor Sports Park 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 26 Special Alt. Use -0 -0 -0 -0 19 58.5 19 58.5 Roads 87 1 87 1 15 1 15 68 73 170 175 TOTAL 562.5 875 1 639 1 639 1,798.5 1,486 3,000 3,000 Note: 1 Incorporated from SPA-1. 2 Land use acres reflect the SPA-6 land use plan. 3 Total amended acres reflect the SPA-1 revision. 4 Stadium East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore • RGP Planning&Development Services East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SD( SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS Figure 5, Land Use Plan, depicts the new configuration of residential uses within the Amendment Six area. Dwelling units in the Amendment Six area will be distributed among the residential classifications as shown in Table 7, Dwelling Unit Summary. TABLE 7 DWELLING UNIT SUMMARY Land Use Dwelling Units Average Density Residential 1 (up to 6 du/ac) 1 ,955 6.0 Residential 2 (up to 14 du/ac) 0 -- Residential 3 (up to 22 du/ac) 0 -- Residential 4 (up to 30 du/ac) 0 -- Mixed-Use 0 -- Total 1,955 6.0 Note: ' Average density calculated on residential acreage only. The purpose of this redistribution of residential uses is to facilitate a more conventional planned residential community which is based primarily on single family detached home neighborhood design. This amended residential plan is consistent with the objectives of the Recreation Village in which it lies, as defined in the East Lake Specific Plan. These objectives include the provision of housing opportunities for those who enjoy a recreational or leisure lifestyle. b. Commercial & Mixed-Uses Amendment Six reduces commercial and eliminates mixed-use development from the amendment area. This results in a reduction of General Commercial uses of 19.3 acres and a reduction of Mixed-uses of 24 acres as compared to the 1993 East Lake Specific Plan approval for the project area. The purpose of this reduction in commercial and mixed-uses is to focus the Amendment Six area on the conventional single family detached residential neighborhood concept discussed above. This decrease in commercial and mixed-use acreage is still consistent with the Recreational Village concept, as outlined in the East lake Specific Plan, which focused commercial activities along Diamond Drive north of Malaga Road and adjacent to the baseball stadium East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services III-7 East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SIX SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS and the primary access point to the Specific Plan area from Interstate 15. c. Open Space Uses Consistent with the East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment Six incorporates two broad types of open space: Developed Open Space and Natural Open Space. The Amendment Six open space system is discussed briefly below and in more detail in Sub-section 6, and is shown in Figure 16, Open Space Plan. Amendment Six increases the overall acreage designated for open space within the amendment area as compared to the 1993 East Lake Specific Plan, and also maintains the diversity of open space uses contained in SPA-2 and in the original East Lake Specific Plan. These uses include golf course, natural open space, wetlands mitigation, habitat corridor and neighborhood parks. Open space uses in Amendment Six total 329 acres as compared to 232 acres in the East Lake Specific Plan. As in SPA-2, open space is primarily consolidated in the westerly portion of the amendment area and along the southerly edge of the amendment area, similar to both SPA-1 & SPA-2. The golf course use will be located on both sides of the San Jacinto River corridor, and will be comprised of both manufactured golf tee, green and fairway areas in addition to natural open space and water quality natural treatment system basins. The River corridor will act as both a wetlands area and wildlife corridor connecting to the 356 acre wetlands mitigation area immediately to the southwest of the Amendment Six area. An existing over-flow parking area for the adjoining baseball stadium will also be affected by the revised land use plan for SPA-6. This existing parking area contains approximately 1 ,500 spaces on a 12 acre graded but unfinished lot on the south side of Malaga Road opposite the stadium. The SPA-6 development concept incorporates relocation of this facility into the proposed multi-use park just to the west of the parking lot's current location. The relocated facility is discussed in more detail in Sub-section 6 below. 2. Circulation Plan Amendment Six will maintain the circulation objectives of the East Lake Specific Plan to promote a variety of transportation options working together to form an efficient and comprehensive circulation system. The circulation network of the amendment area interconnects with the surrounding East Lake Specific Plan roadway East Lake Specifrc Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 111-8 East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SWSPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS components resulting in the creation of a safe and efficient street network in which regionally oriented traffic is separated from local neighborhood traffic. Refinements to circulation in the Amendment Six area are necessitated by the revised land use pattern proposed for the amendment area and by the desire to base the development of Amendment Six on a conventional residential neighborhood pattern rather than the Traditional Neighborhood Design concept envisioned in SPA-1 & SPA-2. This results in two principal types of circulation plan amendments: 1) Modifying roadway alignments (Diamond Drive southerly of Malaga), and 2) Eliminating the narrowed street sections included in SPA-1 & SPA-2 to accommodate Traditional Neighborhood Design objectives incorporated in those previous amendments. These principal types of changes are described as follows: a. Modified Roadway Alignment Amendment Six modifies the alignment of Diamond Drive south of Malaga Road to remove the off-set extension of Diamond Drive. The amended alignment creates a continuous extension of Diamond Drive southerly of Malaga to the southeasterly boundary of the Amendment Six area where it will connect to the extended alignment of Diamond Drive southerly of Amendment Six as established in SPA-1 . This modified alignment is shown in Figure 9, Circulation Plan. This re-alignment will facilitate a more efficient traffic flow southerly through the amendment area. In the southerly half of the amendment area the Diamond alignment coincides with the SPA 2 alignment of Diamond Drive. As Diamond Drive is a General Plan circulation facility, this re- alignment requires a concurrent General Plan Amendment (CPA) to maintain consistency between the East Lake Specific Plan and the General Plan. New Collector Street alignments are proposed to serve the various neighborhoods of the Amendment Six area. These Collectors are designed to connect neighborhoods to Diamond Drive and to Mission Trail to distribute traffic out to the surrounding community. Alignments and connections have been modified according to the modified land use plan but reflect the circulation concepts in SPA-2. The Collector Streets are shown in Exhibit 9. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC +RGP Planning&Development Services 111-9 Ate aUKE AftiWWO t� Ml qi 4.. �. �c.�rr„I ■��+ - MODIFIED MAJOR (4-LANE) -- (I12') MODIFIED COLLECTOR (2-LANE) - (74') John Laing Homes East Lake Specific Plan FIGURE 9 CONCEPTUAL CIRCULATION PLAN East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SIX SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS b. Street Sections Amendment Six eliminates (done in conjunction with the concurrent GPA) the Collector Street designation for Diamond Drive south of Malaga Road established in SPA-2 and the reduced Collector Street and reduced Restricted Local Street sections established by SPA-1 and SPA-2, and re-establishes the basic street section standards contained within Section 5.1 .2.a of the 1993 East Lake Specific Plan, with three exceptions as discussed below. Street sections shown in Figures 9-A and 9-B of SPA-1 and Figures 6 - 10 of SPA-2 are superseded by the modified Amendment Six street sections described below. The three exceptions to the East Lake Specific Plan street sections are described as follows: Modified Major Street section: Diamond Drive within the Amendment Six area is modified to have a 112 foot R-O-W allowing for a 4-lane facility with median, but with expanded landscape parkways and median width. A half street section will include a 7 foot landscaped median, 27 foot travel lanes, 6 foot bike lane, 10 foot landscaped parkway, 6 foot sidewalk to the edge of the R-O-W, and 16 foot landscaped parkway adjacent to but outside of the R-O-W. The modified Major Street section (Diamond Drive) is shown in Figure 10, Street Sections. This section provides the same pavement and median width as the General Plan and ELSP Major Street sections but provides for a wider right-of-way. Modified Collector Street section: Collector streets within the Amendment Six area are modified to have a 74 foot R-O-W allowing for a 2-lane facility with median, with expanded landscaped parkways. A half street section will include a 5 foot landscaped median, 13 foot travel lane, 6 foot bike lane, 8 foot landscaped parkway, 5 foot sidewalk to the edge of the R-O-W, and 12 foot landscaped parkway adjacent to but outside of the R-O-W. The amended Collector Street section is shown in Figure 10, Street Sections. This section provides the same pavement width as the General Plan and ELSP Collector Street sections and also incorporates a landscaped median, all within a wider right-of-way. Modified Local Streets: Neighborhood streets within the Amendment Six area are permitted to utilize modified East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services III-10 d. I �-' 4. 3.0' a.o 30.0 6.0' 3.9 o 0 P6E wNx TRAVEL WALK 12. ' • 46.0'W. 1 MODIFIED PARXNC°ALLOWED NEIGHBORHOOD STREET 'A' 12.0' 5.0' B.O. 6.0' 13.0' 10.0' L 13.0' &O &0' 5.0' 12.0' l CAPE WALL( PMKWAY BIKE TRAVEL IIE)IAN �yd, BKE PARKWAY WALK LANDSCAPE LJOT74.0' R.O.W. NO PARKNG ALLOWED MODIFIED COLLECTOR 'D' db at 5.0' S.0' &0' 36.0 6.0' 5.0 5.O a a ^ - p_ PKWY TRAVEL PKWY W LAND SCARE 72.0' MODIFIED R.O.W. 4 0' 10,0' 6.0' zL0' 14.0' 2r0' 6.0' log6.0' 16.0' R.O.W. SOWED LANDS(/PE WALIf PARKWAY 6KE TRAVEL AIEOUW IAAVEL DIKE PARKWAY WALK UNDS E NEIGHBORHOOD STREET 'B' LOT Lo> Al 112.0' R.O.W. MODIFIED MAJOR 'E' NO PARKING ALLOWED a� STREET SECTIONS RM FWPOI .0' 6,O 12.0' 10.0' 12.0' BA' 6.0' 5.0' 5.0' WY 61NE TRAVEL mom TRAVEL RIKE PKWY W LAND SCAK 64.0 MODIFIED R.OX NO PARKING NEIGHBORHOOD STREET 'C' NO DRIVEWAY ACCESS STREET SECTIONS N.T.S. John Laing Homes The Keith C-Pvnlee 1rxC East Lake Specific Plan FIGURE 10 AMENDMENT STREET SECTIONS East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SIX SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS versions of the Local Street and Restricted Local Street sections, as shown in Section 5.1 .2.a of the East Lake Specific Plan. This amendment establishes three Neighborhood Street sections described below. Local street sections are not addressed in the General Plan. Neighborhood Street Section A has a 48 foot R-O-W composed of one 12 foot travel lane in each direction, two 6 foot parking lanes, and a 6 foot sidewalk on both sides of the street. Neighborhood Street Section 8 has a 72 foot R-O-W composed of one 12 foot travel lane in each direction, two 6 foot parking lanes, and an 8 foot landscaped parkway, 5 foot sidewalk and 5 landscaped parkway adjoining the outside of the sidewalk on both sides of the R-O-W. Neighborhood Street Section C has an 84 foot R-O-W composed of a 10 foot landscaped median, a 12 foot travel lane on each side of the median, 6 foot bike lane, and a 9 foot landscaped parkway, 5 foot sidewalk and 5 foot landscaped parkway adjoining the outside of the sidewalk on both sides of the R-O-W. No parking is allowed and no driveway access is allowed on this street section. The Amendment Six Modified Local Street sections are depicted as Neighborhood Street Sections A, B & C on Figure 10, Street Sections. For reference purposes, Figures A-1 a and A-1 b, Roadway Design Summary, in Appendix B present a comparison of the SPA-6 street sections to the SPA-2, ELSP, and General Plan street sections. c. Pedestrian Circulation Consistent with the circulation objectives of the East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment Six incorporates both street right-of- way walks and a multi-purpose trail system. Street right-of-way walks provide connections between residences, between neighborhoods, and to parks, the school, and golf and recreation clubs. The multi-purpose trail creates a continuous loop around the golf course/open space area providing linkages to and between the major open space and recreational facilities as well as a passive experience. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services III-11 East Lake Speck Plan AMENDMENT SIX SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS 3. Infrastructure (Drainage Plan Water & Sewer Plans Infrastructure plans for the Amendment Six area have been modified to serve the amended land use plan. They have been relocated to conform to the amended street network and designed to serve the amended intensity of uses. Size specifications for infrastructure systems are indicated on each conceptual plan in this section. These amended infrastructure plans are designed to connect with off-site (outside the Amendment Six area) infrastructure as planned for in the East Lake Specific Plan and/or as existing north of Malaga Road and along Mission Trail. Improvements will be constructed as a part of the Amendment Six development and will be phased to provide necessary services to each phase of development. Financing of improvements will be consistent with Section 8.1 of the East Lake Specific Plan. a. Drainage The Drainage Plan is designed to provide for the safe and efficient conveyance of storm water within and through the Amendment Six area while protecting the health, safety and welfare of the public. In addition, the Drainage Plan for the Amendment Six area is a significant component in the solution to the regional drainage issues, and contributes to the implementation of the Lake Elsinore Management Project. The Amendment Six drainage plan proposes changes in storm water routing to conform to the modified street network. This modified drainage plan incorporates curb-face storm drain inlets and a pipe conveyance system to convey storm water ultimately to the wetlands area southerly of the future Bundy Canyon Road alignment. This proposed drainage plan will incorporate a combination of on-site control facilities designed to address storm water runoff management and water quality treatment objectives. The drainage plan includes an integrated approach to water quality involving the utilization of treatment controls designed to function with the drainage plan for the project site and off-site areas tributary to the project, and to address treatment of urban and storm water runoff. Drainage control facilities will include biofiltration swales designed to convey and treat concentrated first-flush flows entering the golf course and the open space buffer from the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services Ili-12 East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SIX SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS storm drain system. These vegetated swales will reduce runoff volumes, provide sediment control and remove pollutants through biofiltration/biological processes. Additional drainage control facilities will include small lakes within the golf course and constructed water quality wetlands. The water quality wetlands and golf course lakes will provide additional biofiltration and sediment control. The constructed wetlands and golf course lakes will overflow into a retention basin located along the southwest boundary of the amendment area near the San Jacinto River alignment and serve to control the quantity of storm water discharge into the adjacent 356 acre Army Corps of Engineers wetlands. To allow for regional flood storage in compliance with the Lake Elsinore Management Plan, the golf course and open space buffer areas will be graded to an elevation of 1 ,240 or below, however, storm water is expected to pond in the flood storage area only under severe storm conditions (30 year or greater storm event). The development area will be graded to achieve elevations of 1 ,266.3 or higher, with an anticipated average development pad elevation of 1 ,267, to provide protection from the 100 year flood event. The conceptual Amendment Six Drainage Plan is presented in Figure 11 . All standards for drainage stated in Section 5.1 .3 of the East lake Specific Plan shall apply to the Amendment Six plan. b. Water & Sewer The Amendment Six water and sewer plans propose minor changes in system routing to conform to the modified street network. The Amendment Six water and sewer plans are described below and presented in Figure 12, Water Plan, and Figure 13, Sewer Plan. The Amendment Six conceptual Water Plan provides a distribution piping system within the major and collector street network. Connections to existing lines adjoining the Amendment Six area occur at Diamond Drive and Malaga Road and at Mission Trail where a collector street intersects with it. A line is stubbed out at the southerly end of Diamond Drive for Future extension into adjoining areas of the East Lake Specific Plan. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-OP Lake Elsinore LLC #RGP Planning&Development Services 111-13 1" ' EOpy�rRJ AF AFFA � �ID 24' # +►;. 72' IV Y s .. EXfiI1NG STORK DRAIN.,. PROPOSED STORM"DRAIN" PROPOSED SEDRaNT/TRASH FOREBAY ,• . .M.,••1 �+ © STORMWATER PUMP John Laing Homes East Lake Specific Plan FIGURE 11 CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN ` PROPOSED X PARAIL. v PPP�o 690 Ft. . AJFA i� 24° ;r I t fi' 0a' �r �is�c 8" •`lr d q0► 1r- WATER MAIN STUB FOR FUTURE EXTENSION + T WATER PER SPECIFIC PLAN PpL�°Cyy (FUTURE IMPROVMENT) LEC � rrw ESQ31fAr0 1IA?19 YAOW John Laing Homes East Lake Specific Plan FIGURE 12 CONCEPTUAL WATER PLAN f' "10bU' TQ _ ' ' OF SITE, ITE SkWER r0 7R6{T,NENr PLANT . APPROX`'t;EN6TFf ;a NUS ; ' �� & ex�sr 1NIck ?� LIFr STATION AQI-1 pLAIY � AFFA � MD. 24 ir Ip10. 1 ,B' 24 •'' g. ff� ' SPECIFICPPtAN 8„ (FUTURE IMPROVMENT) }O" PER SPECIFIC (FUTURE IMPROVMEN ;;. . 2,. x 21 2 `. FU1i)RE OFFSITE CONNECTION Pw i' LEGEND EXMWG SEWER (MAIN �+ PROPOSED SEWER MAW T"•"•:''rw.P"'°°IC I1FT STA77ON John Laing Homes East Lake Specific Plan FIGURE 13 CONCEPTUAL SEWER PLAN East Lake Speck Plan AMENDMENT SIX SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS The Amendment Six Conceptual Sewer Plan provides a collection piping system within the major and collector street network. This conceptual plan is a gravity flow system to the northwesterly corner of the development area adjacent to Malaga Road. At this point a lift station will pump, via a force main, off-site northerly along the San Jacinto River alignment to an existing interceptor line in Lakeshore Drive. This Amendment Six sewer plan eliminates a second pump station and force main which was planned in SPA 1 to pump from the southerly end of Diamond Drive back to the Malaga Road pump station. All standards for water and sewer stated in Section 5.1 .4 of the East lake Specific Plan shall apply to the Amendment Six plans. c. Dry Utilities Dry utility plans, which include electricity, natural gas, telephone, and cable television, are modified to conform to the modified street network. These systems will connect to existing facilities in Malaga Road and in Mission Trail, and will provide for future extensions into adjoining portions of the East lake Specific Plan from the southerly end of Diamond Drive. All standards for dry utilities stated in Section 5.1 .5(e) of the East Lake Specific Plan shall apply to the Amendment Six plans. Conceptual dry utilities plans are shown in Figure 14, Conceptual Dry Utilities. 4. Public Services a. Schools Consistent with the objective of the East Lake Specific Plan to make school facilities an integral part of the community, Amendment Six provides for an elementary school site within the project area. Although schools are permitted in any residential zone, the Amendment Six land use plan designates a central location of 13 acres for the school site. School requirements will be addressed pursuant to a mitigation agreement required to be entered into with the school district under the East Lake Specific Plan Condition of Approval #77. It is ultimately up to the school district to determine if this site is one they want to acquire for future school development. 5. Grading Plan The Amendment Six grading plan shown in Figure 15 is consistent with the East Lake Specific Plan concepts and requirements. The East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services III-14 t i WSCRAi ,d .r .. � ExrsrrMc 7a & LEGEND 2-5" ELECTRICAL & 2-4" TELEPHONE ^ 4-5" ELECTRICAL TELEPHONE John Laing Homes East Lake Specific Plan FIGURE 14 CONCEPTUAL DRY UTILITIES 1., .. r A , ax WAQ rye ,en,5 1!/1 A � A N _Y John Laing Homes East Lake Specific Plan FIGURE 15 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SD( SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS Amendment Six plan raises all development areas above the FEMA established 100 year flood plain elevation to a minimum elevation of 1 ,266.3 and an average development pad elevation of 1 ,267. The basic objective of the grading plan is to allow for regional flood storage in compliance with the Lake Elsinore Management Plan and protection of the health, safety and welfare of the public. To achieve this objective the golf course and open space buffer areas will be graded to an elevation of 1 ,240 or below. The development area will be graded to achieve elevations of 1 ,266.s or higher as outlined above. Grading standards included in Section 5.1 .6 of the East Lake Specific Plan shall apply to the Amendment Six plan. 5.1.6.b Development Standards (incorporated from SPA-2) • Grading shall be allowed to occur anywhere within the Specific Plan regardless of phase, village, land use, or planning area boundaries. Grading shall be consistent with City, State, and Federal regulations as well as conditions of approval imposed through the ELSP and SPA-6 amendment. • Prior to any development approvals within each phase, an overall conceptual grading plan for that phase shall be submitted for City approval. The grading plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading plans for individual stages of development within the phase and shall include the following: ✓ Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and sedimentation during and after the grading process. ✓ Approximate timeframes for grading, including identification of areas which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January through March. ✓ Preliminary pad and roadway elevations. • Grading shall be permitted outside the area of immediate development, land use, or planning area, when it is consistent with an approved development plan. Stockpile and borrow sites may be permitted subject to an approved grading plan, maintenance of flood storage capacity standards, and compliance with the Levee 404 Permit. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning& Development Services lil-15 East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SIX SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS • The developer must provide a report prepared by a licensed engineering geologist and/or soils engineer as the basis for the grading plans. The report is to document methods for providing a safe and stable development. • Where cut and fill slopes are created in excess of 3 feet in vertical height, detailed landscaping and/or alternative plans shall be submitted to the City prior to approval of grading plans. • Erosion control measures including NPDES requirements shall be developed and incorporated into the final grading plans for the project. • Applications for interim uses governed through the Interim Use Permit process must clearly indicate the extent of grading within and outside of planning area boundaries, maintain flood storage capacity standards, and shall comply with the Levee 404 Permit. 6. Open Space Plan The Amendment Six open space concept, presented in Figure 16, Open Space Plan, is basically the same concept as that incorporated in both SPA-1 and SPA-2. This concept is to preserve the westerly portion of the amendment area as a flood storage basin, integrating various developed and natural open space features. The principal change from the SPA-2 open space plan is to reestablish the San Jacinto River corridor in its historic alignment as was proposed in SPA-1 , as a 200 foot wide wetlands mitigation/multi-habitat corridor. The river corridor will also be designed with a system of swales and basins to manage water quality. The East Lake Specific Plan defines open space uses as either "developed open space" or "natural open space". Within Amendment Six, developed and natural open space features include the following: Developed/Active Open Space Multi-Use Park: Located on both sides of the San Jacinto River corridor on the south side of Malaga Road, this feature provides almost 33 acres of multi-use recreational facility and overflow parking for the baseball stadium. It is also located adjacent to the golf driving range. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 111-16 c F H ) \ 4 i001, 4 �3 6 I I /5 � r _... ; r I , Active Open Space Natural Open Space 1 Multi-Use Park 6 Open Space Buffer 2 Neighborhood Park 7 San Jacinto River Corridor 3 Linear Nature Trail 4 Golf Course 5 Golf & Recreation Clubs John Laing Homes East Lake Specific Plan FIGURE 16 OPEN SPACE PLAN East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SD( SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS Vehicle access will be from Malaga Road and pedestrian and golf cart access will be provided from the residential development area and the golf club house via a vehicular crossing over the San Jacinto River corridor. The stadium overflow parking will replace the existing lot on the south side of Malaga Road which will be displaced by the revised SPA-6 residential development plan. This will be a paved parking area to provide a shared parking facility for the adjoining park recreational uses and golf driving range, and will act as the stadium's overflow parking on an as-needed basis. This will be a 1 ,500 space facility resulting in no loss of parking capacity due to the displacement of the existing stadium overflow parking lot, and will create an improved parking facility. Neighborhood Parks: There are four neighborhood park facilities, comprising approximately 8.3 acres, which are distributed within the residential neighborhoods and range from 0.9 to 5.4 acres in size. Three of these parks are small neighborhood focal points of approximately 1 acre each. The fourth park is a 5 acre facility located adjacent to the proposed elementary school site in the center of the residential development area. These parks will be provided with a variety of amenities depending on their size. Linear Nature Trail: Located around the perimeter of the golf course/open space area, this feature will provide a trail connection between a variety of open space and recreational uses including the multi-use park, the golf and recreation clubs, and the open space buffer area. The trail will have a varying width with an average width of 2 5 feet, with a 6 foot wide natural material trail surface. The character of this trail will be natural rather than formally planted and will afford a passive experience. Golf.Course/Open Space. Located on both sides of the San Jacinto River corridor, this area will include both an 18- hole golf course and driving range and passive open space features, as well as providing flood retention and biological habitat areas. Golf and Recreation Clubs: Located adjacent to the golf course/open space area, these two facilities comprise approximately 7 acres and provide major active recreation facilities within the Plan. The Recreation Club, sitting on 4 East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services III-17 East Lake Speck Plan AMENDMENT SD( SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS acres overlooking the golf course/open space area, will combine both in-door and out-door recreational uses, picnic areas and passive viewing areas. Natural/Passive Open Space Open Space Buffer: Located along the southerly boundary of the amendment area, this open space area separates the residential development area and the golf course from the 356 acre wetlands mitigation area immediately to the south of the amendment area. It will provide drainage, flood retention and biological habitat functions. San lacinto River. Corridor: Located within the golf course area, the river corridor follows the historic drainage course of the river and provides a 200 foot wide wetlands and wildlife corridor function. As was established in SPA-1 this corridor is separated from urban land uses to enhance its biologic value and wetlands function. Amendment Six open space acreages are presented in the following Table 8 and in Figure 16, Open Space Plan. TABLE 8 OPEN SPACE ACREAGE SUMMARY OPEN SPACE ACRES Developed/Active Open Space • Multi-use Park 33.0 • Neighborhood Parks 8.3 • Linear Nature Trail 8.7 • Golf Course/Open Space 176.2 • Golf& Recreation Clubs 7.0 Sub-total 233.2 Natural/Passive Open Space • Open Space Buffer 70.8 • San Jacinto River Corridor 25.0 Sub-total 95.8 Total Open Space 329 Figure 17, Conceptual Landscape Plan; Figure 18, Conceptual Recreation Center Plan; Figure 19, Central Neighborhood Park East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services III-18 East Lake Speck Plan AMENDMENT SD( SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS Concept; Figure 20, Typical Neighborhood Focal Park Concept; Figure 21 , Multi-Use Park & Overflow Parking Concept; and Figure 22, Linear Nature Trail Concept present conceptual plans for the various open space and park features of the Amendment Six area. Section 5.1 .7 of the ELSP indicates that planned public park acreage within the overall ELSP will exceed the City's standard of 5 acres per 1 ,000 residents. The City's current criteria for park credit requires a minimum park size of 5 acres which allows for primarily active recreational uses. Although the Amendment Six open space plan provides for recreational amenities which exceed the City's standard of 5 acres per 1,000 residents, not all of these facilities will be publicly operated and not all will meet the 5 acre minimum size requirement. Based on 1 ,480 dwelling units on the accompanying Tentative Tract Map and 3.22 persons per household, 23.8 acres of park/recreation area would be necessary, with a minimum individual facility size of 5 acres, to satisfy the City's public park requirement. The Amendment Six plan incorporates the following park and recreational facilities which are broken down between qualifying for City park credit and non-qualifying for City credit. TABLE 9 RECREATIONAL FACILITIES SUMMARY Recreational Facility Acres Qualifying' Multi-use ,Park (net of overflow 21 .5 parking) Central Neighborhood Park 5.4 Linear Nature Trail 8.7 Subtotal 35.6 Non-qualifying Neighborhood Focal Parks (3) 2.9 Recreation Center 4.0 Golf Clubhouse 3.0 Golf Course/Driving Range 176.2 Subtotal 186.1 Total 221.7 Note: ' Qualifying for City park credit based on City area criteria. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services III-19 —•PARK SITE WITH OVERFLOW PARKING '�'y-i+�' •MULTI-PURPOSE TRAIL .....,.w_""~''^,- •MAINTENANCE FACILITY `•r ��•+,,,,�� •GOLF COURSE CLUBHOUSE ~-'-""• _"'.•,�...�,�. PARCEL 12 wo. •PRIMARY COMMUNITY ENTRY • •NEIGHBORHOOD PARKA `'•']H - - nAn,w cm PARCELI9 S.M. • S H��' ) a,P'� •NEIGHBORHOOD PARK D E • 3 i 9 ' i vnkcEL» Ty lo.r 1.• ,� � �' ��, � � ,)fj' 4. SECONDARY COMMUNITY ENTRY• - 1. �� l] `+•rr•r• r0,•l l'f ��hr� 'r�. :4: i ,. E +,��• •rr = � �,C 1 �U� i \ ,• ,�- y f• a�Y 00 RIPARIAN HABITAT. `�. c ` ..�� >-� I •, �4s•. :e r 1 )� •A'. J( �� i PARCEL J ••• Pt �• �( .i -r !: RntcEvrtA o•0 rARceus •`•• 1,q � A�f ;�� •-..�. a �'" y >.TACI,ES i vnNc-I; 4 •� r `Q,l�f• e L• ev ! • f � � ,'>�'750 �� ' -.:(T-•. •••e 4.rklYM1ll. •� ; - .t. rl L 1 _i, PART 11 ••.•r r, f M•�••• A ,T. •17V f / •••• • ((( _•, ••• ijE PAACEI 9 j{ •�•• 'A•.^EL S ,� r • � �,� ••r•• RARCEI 10 d • ,' T �l Y Id •lr• • / d /' 1 f vAe I•ur t � L c7•' A+ `. �,_ �:... A!. i {{�11 s i' .�w ��•� iy �� y�E/ ► is •d, /� M1`.�r/ 1. ,J` • PARCE t) 1/j PARC/L 11 r• �. PARLEL25 PARLEL20 �? • STREET TREE LEGEND �.R •• •• • • - ; ELEMENTARY SCHOOL _. r •#/ .,�: ^E!"n"".: a�l:ro.,w �4 ;• PARceI to o0,c ',. ' �i*41' y •• .•(ar• ;�—-- •NEII�HBORHOOD PARK C •THEMED STREET SCENE TREE PARCEL 26 • •1 • ~ffii ; SECONDARY STREET SCENE TREE �• / M • PARcel lE •i •r+•� i PRIMARY STREET SCENE TREE � a0sm isa" •r•r ~r / • •• 1• uA•c ••4 4• 'C • EVERGREEN MASS RIPARIAN HABITAT-' O r• PRIMARY FOCAL TREE ,�� _ r PARCF 1) j RESIDENT RECREATION CENTER PARCEL xJ j� .�ai PAR ! SECONDARY FOCAL TREE �1�� AESmt`rt'.AL � \ CEL IS i • �• PARCEL27 ,EAc .e"Z�e _mot •• - i PRIMARY ACCENT TREE SECONDARY ACCENT TREE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK B• PARCEL 21 STREET SCENE BACKDROP TREE ry AL RAflCtr.+. ----- STREET TREE LEGEND � �• � ; •-I—STREET SCERE TREE PARCEL xO RH.'IClV•U4 i � .SKONOARY STREET SCENE TREE 'FIIIIMR1S ET •NERGa!lN MASS _ �� %' PRIMARY FECAL.INEE �. EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN - AMENDMENT SIX SFf:IINNWY HKAI INEE MUMMY ACCENT TREE : 2GYN UMY KLEf T INFF � FIGURE 17 10 1' 11 •ETRECT SCENE OACKO TRCE e V• '.• !M1MIO ,C.. CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN � t t SHADE STRUCTURE - ' ' • POOL -- - �� `:. ADJACENT GOLF COURSE • -�� • SPA AMPHITHEATER • ` C r • SHADE STRUCTURE WATER PLAY . - �_ - --• I-AP POOL RESTROOM AND POOL .......� li • CLUB HOUSE BUILDING EQUIPMENT BUILDING PICNIC PADS • - -\\ \\ ` PARKING LOT {+/- 62 TOTAI VOLLEYBALL COURT • t j_ C� •x�l L. � 1 t.` 1 OPEN PLAY• EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN - AMENDMENT SIX LAND CONCERN FIGURE 18 John Laing Humes Z w na�`Ju"'+, ��,• CONCEPTUAL RECREATION CENTER PLAN l4 GAZEBO • y„� ; I: �.` �' - IOT LOI • f �' 44 . RESTROOM BUILDING • /\/ SOCCER FIELD • ci,H SHADE STRUCTURE • `(la' • BASEBALL FIELD t• t• r•; ';\ �Z • INJECTION WELL 10 200 FT. � I i — — — -- — — -- —l. — I --- —120 FT_---- -- � _r— 215 FT, }r LAND CONCERN EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN - AMENDMENT SIX Rpll'W Uen.d.e .bnu\KI'A4lYN John Laing Homes nua»o.+x�.ru+am=�� FIGURE 19 flau✓ur,p„i aln.r 180.4 CENTRAL NEIGHBORHOOD PARK CONCEPT f� DEPRESSED TURF ` OPEN PLAY o. v 0 • TOT LOT • of • WATER PLAY • l -- + PICNIC PADS r -� SUALL•:V --r EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN - AMENDMENT SIX LAND CONCERN FIGURE 20 John Laing Homes Jj� �bLV210.4$2,F'XJ.7i= );��) TYPICAL NEIGHBORHOOD FOCAL PARK llaulw�rh�d,rlu�•.184.4 917�444N:',F'W1.75?:.:N) PICNIC PAD(TYP.) ~ - PARKINGIMULTI-USE AREA MULTI-PURPOSE TRAIL PARKING LOT PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR STADIUM f GOLF COURSE flr71i7L�+1.' MAINTENANCE FACILTY + ' 1 1+ C�11 ��' f 17�1 J J,1�f OPEN PLAY AREA '�,�t;-r�r� TWO SOCCER FIELDS 350 X 200 EACH ONE BASEBALL FIELD { >J 300'MIN FOUL LINE •' - r ACCESS ROAD GROUPPICNICAREA �R (TYP.) \ �. PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR PARKING LOT(� YAW . , \ Chi, I i RIPARIAN I IABITAT GROUP PICNIC AREA \ SOCCER FIELD LA ND LD CONCERN . °' °g"i"me' w.. n:; .�w' Total Parking: t tsoo EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN - AMENDMENT SIX FIGURE 21 MULTI-USE PARK & OVERFLOW PARKING CONCEPT r � •�4*Y`l+��,, I..P rl•r" �f�? in- /�(' �C •! � ��rvq ( ` i_ � 'ir�! �1 J �cz u.s- u . k3 FENCE f s sti 40 �s 3'-0" 61-0" 5'-0" 5'-0. CART PATH , MIN. q D.G.TRAIL MIN MIN. 25'-0" " fT h L A N D c o N C E R N EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN - AMENDMENT SIX John Laing Humes LAKV.CAR■ A91III11CTURR FIGURE 22 Nunl<rvllctl,vincr 1848 I',SOGutDameAr.n"a,SmaAnrtiCAn2v(16 44rRZ50.+ft?:.F 9-0.752.^1tlN LINEAR NATURE TRAIL CONCEPT East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SD( SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS Based on the above summary, SPA-6 fully meets the strict public park credit criteria, and actually provides recreational amenities far in excess of the standard park formula requirement. 7. Project Phasin No changes to the adopted phasing plan of the East Lake Specific Plan are proposed. The Amendment Six project area is consistent with the area identified as Phase I in the East Lake Specific Plan. All phasing development standards stated in Section 5.2 of the East Lake Specific Plan shall apply to Amendment Six. Implementation of development within the Amendment Six area will require improvements to circulation, drainage, water, sewer, and utility infrastructure. Water, sewer, drainage and other utility improvements will be constructed to adequately meet the development needs identified within each Planning Area. The phasing program for the SPA-6 area will be based on the planning areas identified in Figure 5, Land Use. As development is initiated in any planning area, infrastructure improvements will be constructed prior to or concurrent with incremental development in a manner to maximize the cost effectiveness and efficiency within the planning area. Infrastructure phasing will be keyed to street improvement phasing on the premise that all critical infrastructure components are installed as a part of the street construction/improvement process. The developer (John Laing Homes) shall prepare and/or review all infrastructure planning and design and provide professional engineering judgment regarding adequacy of design, cost effectiveness and efficiency, subject to any reviewing agency's determination that agency design standards and health and safety requirements have been satisfied. Some of these improvements may be interim improvements until permanent facilities become available. Figure 23, Phasing, indicates the anticipated development of the SPA-6 area taking place in four phases. These phases are briefly described as follows: Phase l This phase will include residential development areas in the northeasterly corner of the project area with development of necessary portions Diamond Drive, Malaga Road and Mission Trail street improvements concurrent with adjoining uses. This phase will also include development of the Multi-use Park adjacent to the San ,Jacinto River corridor, the river corridor East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC +RGP Planning&Development Services 111-20 =i r 1 .lk*4) €j k 41 ,A, 3 2 1 b A ;.ti►yyyyyyy� �y��*s John Laing Homes NORTH East Lake Specific Plan SCALE: NTS FIGURE 23 EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN - AMENDMENT SIX PHASING East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SD( SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS grading improvements, and initiation of the golf course grading and improvements, club house and all golf course facilities. Phase 2 This phase will include the residential development areas abutting the golf course/open space area, and the commercial area fronting Malaga Rd. Development of necessary portions of Diamond Drive and other street improvements will be done concurrent with adjoining uses. Phase 3 This phase will include the residential development areas along the easterly boundary of the project area as well as the central neighborhood park. Necessary portions of Diamond Drive and other street improvements will be done concurrent with adjoining uses. Phase 4 This phase will include residential development areas in the southerly portion of the project area and enhancement of the open space buffer along the southerly boundary of the project area. Necessary portions of Diamond Drive and other street improvements will be done concurrent with adjoining uses. Althoucih the four _development phases described above are anticipated to be developed in the order they are numbered, the phasing approach for the Amendment Six area is not intended to dictate time sequential development. Many factors will influence the timing, rate, sequence and location of individual parcel development including market demand, interest rates, absorption, financing and other similar factors. Concurrent development within different planning areas may occur depending on construction logistics, logical infrastructure extensions, and market conditions. The developer shall exercise its prudent business judgment in developing the property, recognizing that reaardless of the actual sequence and location of parcel development development of the golf course will be included in the initial phase of development. F. Amendments to Section VI - Design Guidelines ELSP Summa This section of the ELSP delineates the broad concepts of design for the ELSP to guide the more detailed planning of the community. It defines the broad community design concept, outlines landscape guidelines for East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services III-21 East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SDC SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS community structure at the District level, and defines the architectural character envisioned for the residential neighborhoods. Area of Amendment SPA-6 incorporates changes to Section 6.3.1 .d regarding the Diamond Drive street section landscape treatment, Section 6.3.1 .e regarding Collector Street landscape treatments, and Section 6.3.1 .g regarding Local Street landscape treatments. These revisions apply to the SPA-6 development area and result from revisions to these street section designs. Changes are also incorporated in Section 6.4.1 , Architectural Character, to define two additional residential styles which are encouraged for the community. Discussion Amendment Six will maintain the community design objectives of the East Lake Specific Plan to promote an environmentally sensitive open space/recreationally oriented community as envisioned in Section 6.2 of the East Lake Specific Plan. Amendments to streetscape landscape treatments and to the architectural character sections follow. 1. Landscape Guidelines Amendment Six refines the Landscape Guideline concepts presented in Section 6.3.1 of the Specific Plan regarding streetscape landscape treatments for Major and Collector streets within the Amendment Six area. These streetscape landscape concepts are shown in Figure 24, Diamond Drive Landscape Concept; Figure 25, Modified Collector Landscape Concept; Figure 26, Neighborhood Street A Landscape Concept; Figure 27, Neighborhood Street B Landscape Concept; and Figure 28, Neighborhood Street C Landscape Concept and are described as follows: a. Diamond Drive - Major Street Landscape Concept The Diamond Drive (shown as 6.3.1 A Railroad Canyon Road/Multi-Habitat Corridor in the 1993 Specific Plan) landscape concept is modified to reduce the landscape zone outside the R- OW in favor of more landscaping within the R-O-W and a landscape concept which is more evenly distributed across the street section. This Amendment Six modified landscape concept is contained within an expanded 112 foot R-O-W (see Figure 6, Street Sections). The modified design concept includes a 14 foot East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 111-22 till Nc X/11� AA (44, A t All dh Nr 4w 6..0" 61.0. 27'-0' 27'-0" 6-01 101-0* 161-01, LANDSCAPE LOT WALK PARKWAY BIKE TRAVEL MEDIAN TRAVEL BIKE PARKWAY WALK LANDSCAPE L-1 112'-0"R.O.W. NO PARKING ALLOWED rr L A N E R N D CO NC Likmaochts Axtmvirstivali John Laing Homes EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN - AMENDMENT SIX Hand eq/ted.%inve M48 13011 DocreiUM'SA%hAnA CA 927.0 -?4 9.7-50 X 4 U 1,11'�9 7.M?,24 W FIGURE 24 a7WDIAMOND DRIVE LANDSCAPE CONCEPT J � c aft' t � �'Qj"' �.' � /• �.� .+7M< L � S• • � i'�1 r. i4 9y ',C>" 6a��p,�k�� ( �eT4" (7 a . �� jt b � t� .,.Nab 'y' • � G �'.�.• h. .+ '' �' ✓ Jv.. 'fJi• Mew 1 12'-0" 5'-0" 8'-0" _6'-0" 13' 0" 10'-0" 13' 0" G' 0" H'-0" 5'-0" LANDSCAPE LOT WALK PARKWAY BIKE IRAVLL MEDIAN TRAVEL BIKE PARKWAY WALK LANDSCAPE LOT /4'-0"R.O.W. NO PARKIN ALLOWED 1�1 arnl f ra'.I m �rl LAN D CONCERN EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN - AMENDMENT SIX John Laing Homeq LA.,-Alt AAltl lTO 1Y11L !750 li;til ihen.at 2,F 49.7 214 C.A'+Llllti FIGURE 2 5 (fn+u(['lY1fiCJ\I,vxr 784h 979.75046T7,R9��9.7S23dGi MODIFIED COLLECTOR LANDSCAPE CONCEPT 1� r f, 1.✓ �� F tt .., i�.� 3'-0" 6'-0" _ 36'-011 6'-0" 0, 3'-0" PUE 0 WALK A TRAVEL WALK PUE 48'-0" R.O.W. PARKING ALLOWED LAND C O N C E R N EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT SIX Joan Laing Homes I.A\D7,:APA AXC;117TA. TUBA FIGURE 26 rkuul cruficJ Since 1.N lei MA)L SI 3.u1 A 9274, .1 2,�1 4bu 75_.31f NEIGHBORHOOD STREET-A LANDSCAPE CONCEPT v f' c �y. 1. �\- ��•1° J 1;• i�it,�$ T.' �•`�. V1r � l 1.k� ti s 'wry,,,,' � f1,,. ` Lin._ ,•t 1� R f 7- rx 51-0" 5'-0" 8'-0" 36'-0" 8'-0" 51-0" 50-0" LANDSCAPE' WALK PARKWAY TRAVEL PARKWAY WALK LANDSCAP 72"-0" R.O.W. PARKING ALLOWED n , a U-J , 1 5. iT John Laing Homes `1.A"NP�IRCA°oNITAcTV71N EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN - AMENDMENT SIX flmld L•rgfrC(I unce 1848 MA)FAA tkwr A4 nw.Study Aai,(.A 92705 949.250,4822.F 949.752.2469 FIGURE 27 NEIGHBORHOOD STREET-B LANDSCAPE CONCEPT � � � or�• �. c" ."Z' c' iry ��; �1 _ E'' ^� a . :� off), ez (f elc, �1�✓ z _ ,�. 4� ''k /if j.�,-✓i � �C v e ( �, Y,'�,L)� ^^r�J•' t•� �' t 'fir (• _ Y i/� 1 / !(yam, � -, -T'\` • � — .�1 1p I ' I II sou � 1 n 1 u 5 1 1 1 u 1 1 1 a 1 1 1 1_ .1 1 1 1 a 9-0' 6-0 12-0' 10-0 _ 12-0' 6-0n 9 0 5-0' S-0 LANDSCAPE1 WALK I PARKWAY BIKE TRAVEL MEDIAN TRAVEL BIKE PARKWAY WALK LANDSCAPE 84'-0" R.O.W. NO PARKING ALLOWED NO DRIVEWAY ACCESS u 4 s IJC VAL1::'M P-0' L A N D C O N C E R. N EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN - AMENDMENT SIX John Laing Homes L ,,K,11AYM1 A0.CH14YC Q-1 FIGURE 28 1L.F,,rl lxan+A,'cnA 9Y," .i p f'.,.? v Ilund c:1ilied inc'e 1848 949.750.4312.1919.73:?.2469 NEIGHBORHOOD STREET-C LANDSCAPE CONCEPT East Lake Speck Plan AMENDMENT SIX SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS landscaped median, a 10 foot landscaped parkway separating the sidewalk from the travel lanes, and a 16 foot landscape zone on both sides of the street outside the R-O-W. These changes reflect a revised street section design and vary from the ELSP concept as the street alignment no long abuts the multi- habitat corridor. b. Collector Street Landscape Concept The Collector Street (shown as 6.3.1 .e Collector Streets in the 1993 Specific Plan) landscape concept is modified to a landscape concept which is evenly distributed across the street section, but still utilizes the concept of a landscape lot or zone abutting but outside the R-O-W. This Amendment Six modified landscape concept is based on an expanded 74 foot R-O-W (see Figure 6, Street Sections). The modified design concept includes a 10 foot landscaped median, an 8 foot landscaped parkway separating the sidewalk from the travel lanes, and a 12 foot landscape zone adjacent to the sidewalk but outside the R-O-W. c. Local or Neighborhood Street Landscape Concept The Local Street (shown as 6.3.1 .g Local Streets in the 1993 Specific Plan) landscape concept is not proposed to be modified, but in lieu of this section three alternative Restricted Local Street sections will be used within the SPA-6 area. These sections have varying landscape treatments as shown below. Neighborhood Street Section A is a 48 foot R-O-W with a 6 foot sidewalk and no landscaping within the R-O-W. Neighborhood Street Section B is a 72 foot R-O-W with an 8 foot landscaped parkway separating the sidewalk from the travel lanes, a 5 foot sidewalk, and a 5 foot landscape zone between the sidewalk and the edge of the R-O-W. Neighborhood Street Section C is an 84 foot R-O-W with a 10 foot landscaped median, 12 foot travel lanes and 6 foot bike lanes, a 9 foot landscaped parkway separating the sidewalk from the travel lanes, a 5 foot sidewalk, and a 5 foot landscape zone between the sidewalk and the edge of the R- OW. Each of these street sections is depicted in Figure 6, Street Sections. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 111-23 East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SIX SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS 2. Architectural Guidelines Amendment Six clarifies the application of architectural design guidelines incorporated in Section 6.4 of the East Lake Specific Plan in light of contemporary design and construction practices, and identifies two additional architectural styles which are encouraged within the ELSP. 6.4.1 Architectural Character The architectural character envisioned for the residential neighborhoods within East Lake is influenced by the historical precedents of earlier development within the Elsinore valley during the 1920's and 1930's. Examples of the architectural styles commonly found in the area during this time period include Spanish Eclectic, Monterey, Craftsman, Victorian and vernacular Ranch. The Design Guidelines establish the framework to achieve harmony and compatibility within residential neighborhoods, while providing the flexibility to create variety in the architectural expression and interpretation of the design styles envisioned for the community. A brief description of the architectural styles encouraged to be used at East Lake are discussed below. In addition to the five architectural styles mentioned above. Prairie and Traditional sues are also encouraged to enhance the diverse architectural nature of the community and reflect the eclectic nature of many older neighborhoods. In interpreting these styes for project design within the East Lake plan. it is recognized that contemporary applications of historic steles may not be as detailed based on current building materials, construction and maintenance costs. However, contemporary designs should incorporate the key features of the style using contemporary building practices and balancing construction costs with affordability objectives for each project so that a range of housing types and prices, are available within the community. T_he two additional architectural styles are briefly described as follows: Prairie: The Prairie style, developed in the Midwestern states in the early part of the 2011 century, is characterized by low pitched roofs, usually hipped and strong horizontal lines. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 111-24 East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SIX SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS Wide overhanging eaves are common with massing usuall employing one and two story elements. Essential elements of Prairie design include low pitched roof forms with wide overhanc is, hipped dormers horizontal rows of windows, strong horizontal lines through mason detail or siding design, large square_porches, and upper portions of windows divided into small geometric patterns. Traditional: The Traditional style is a mixture of several themes including Colonial Plantation, and East Coast Eclectic. The use of brick veneer and/or wood siding with heavier trim above doors and windows is typical. Wood shutters are common and white picket fences may round out the details. There are one and two story elements with simple gable forms. Porches are common and mAy be one or two stories with flat or shallow hipped roofs. Essential elements of Traditional design include simple straightforward volumes with one-story wings and porches to make more complex shapes symmetrical composition of doors and windows, simplified versions of Classical details and columns, and multiple dormers with multi-lite windows. G. Amendments to Section VII - Development Regulations ELSP Summa This section of the ELSP sets out site development criteria in the form of tailored zoning regulations to regulate development within each land use category. Area of Amendment SPA-6 incorporates changes to Section 7.3, Definitions, Section 7.4, Residential Development Regulations, and Section 7.5, Commercial Development Regulations Discussion This section of Amendment Six describes changes to Development Regulations contained in Section VII of the East Lake Specific Plan and as modified by SPA-2 in Section VII of that document. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 111-25 East Lake Speck Plan AMENDMENT SIX SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS 1. Revisions to Definitions building or outbuilding whieh-vit-aceessed from an alley or local street and -is norm-ally between 350 and V_JV square feet. The-Mimary 0 property owner. -The garage--apalllTte-rit- May have—la turn Of one cooking fcaa -I H ty "anAd s hall not be ed by more than two low-Ople. One parking -s-pace apartment may als !be;, uIsse-U! by IVr Code anu' this 5pecifie Plan. 7.3.49 Street, Major. Streets with a 100 foot R.O.W., designed primarily to move moderate volumes of traffic and to provide connections from residential neighborhoods to the Urban Arterial streets. Within the Amendment Six area, Diamond Drive shall have a modified Major Street design with a 112 foot R.O.W. and a modified street section as shown in Figure 6 of this Amendment Six document. 7.3.50 Street, Collector Streets with a 60-68 foot R.Q.W., designed primarily to collect traffic from residential neighborhoods and distribute it to streets of higher classification. Within the Amendment Six area Collector Streets shall have a 74 foot R.O.W. and a modified street section as shown in Figure 6 of this Amendment Six document. 7.3.51 Street, Local Streets with a 60 foot R-O-W, designed to achieve a small neighborhood scale while moving traffic from nearby Collectors to individual residences. Within the Amendment Six area Local Streets shall be called Neicihborhood Streets and shall have two alternative _modified street sections Neighborhood Street B shall have a 72 foot R-O-W and a modified street section as shown in Fi ure 6 of this Amendment Six document. Neighborhood Street C.shall have an 84 foot R-O-W and a _modified street section including_a median as shown _in Figure 6 of this Amendment Six document. 7.3.52 Street, Restricted Local Streets with 56 foot R.O.W. designed for residential neighborhoods. Restricted Local Streets are designed to provide satisfactory circulation East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 111-26 East Lake Speck Plan AMENDMENT SIX SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS when considered in relationship to planned land uses and the comprehensive planned circulation system. Within the Amendment Six area Restricted Local Streets shall be called Neighborhood Street A, and shall have a 48 foot R-O-W and a 6 foot sidewalk. 2. Revisions to Residential Development Regulations Sections or sub-sections with Amendment Six revisions are listed below. 7.4.2 Revisions to Residential 1 (Up to 6 DU/AQ b. Accessory Uses (incorporated from SPA-2) • Garages and carports • Swimming pools • Garden structures and greenhouses • Fences and walls • Patio covers and trellises Accessory uses and structures necessary or customarily incidental to a permitted use. d. Site development standards • Minimum lot area:5,000 square feet • Minimum lot width: 50' at building setback • Minimum building setbacks o Urban Arterial: 20' from community wall to building o Major Street: 20' from community wall to building a Collector Street: 25' from curb to sound attenuation wall where proposed; 40' from curb to front of building. a Local Street or Restricted Local Street (measured from edge of R-O-W): ■ 1 5' to habitable portion of dwelling ■ 18' to private straight—in garage ■ 1 5' to side entry garage o Side: Five W) feet to habitable portion of dwelling a Rear: ■ Fifteen 05' feet to habitable portion of dwelling a Porch projections: Open or covered porches, may extend into required front and rear yard setbacks up to 6 feet and 10 feet, respectively, subject to a East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC r RGP Planning&Development Services 111-27 East Lake Speck Plan AMENDMENT SIX SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS limitation of 50% of the required setback. Porches may be constructed at both first and second stories of residential structures. ❑ Building lot coverage: 60% maximum, excluding permitted porches and architectural projections ❑ Building height: 35' maximum. 3. Revisions to Commercial Development Regulations 7.5.2 General Commercial(GC) (incorporated from SPA-2) C. Site development standards • Minimum lot area: No minimum • Minimum major street frontage width: 100' • Minimum building setbacks: ❑ Front: 1 5' (20 average) ❑ Side & Rear: Zero feet along interior lot lines except adjacent to a public right-of-way or residential use, in which case the minimum setback shall be 1 5'. • Minimum parking setbacks: ❑ 10' from property lines • Screening of mechanical equipment: All mechanical equipment such as, but not limited to, air conditioning, heating ventilating ducts and exhaust shall be completely screened from view from any public street, open space, or residential area through the use of solid walls, fences, or other similar opaque material. • Building height: 45' maximum; 65' for architectural features such as towers, cupolas, and other elements that contribute to the overall character of the community, do not contain usable space above 45', and have a footprint area of less than 250 square feet. • Off-street parking: Off-street parking shall be in conformance with Section 7.8, Parking Requirements. 4. Revisions to Landscape Development Regulations 7.10 Landscape Requirements 7.10.1 Perimeter Streets: The perimeter streets of East Lake, including Lakeshore, Mission Trail, and Corydon Road shall be landscaped to a minimum dimension of 20 feet, as measured from the curb. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 111-28 East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SIX SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS 7.10.3 Major Streets: The Major streets within East Lake shall be landscaped to a minimum dimension of 47 feet, as measured from the curb. Within the Amendment Six area this criteria shall be modified to require a combined landscape dimension of 32 feet, measured from the curb. This area may incorporate the sidewalk. 7.10.4 Collector Streets: The Collector streets within East Lake shall be landscaped to a minimum dimension of 30 feet, as measured from the curb to a sound attenuation wall where proposed, or 40 feet as measured from the curb to a building where no sound attenuation wall is proposed. Within the Amendment Six area this criteria shall be modified to require a combined landscape dimension of 25 feet to a sound attenuation wall where proposed. or other prope line barrier, measured from the curb. This area may incorporate the sidewalk. H. Amendments to Section Vlll - Implementation ELSP Summary This section of the ELSP describes the financing techniques which may be used to achieve the successful implementation of the various infrastructure improvements necessary for the project. Area of Amendment No Amendments proposed Discussion Amendment Six, along with other parts of the ELSP, will utilize some combination of the financing techniques discussed in Section VIII of the East Lake Specific Plan. I. Amendments to Section IX - Administration of the Specific Plan ELSP Summary This section of the ELSP defines the relationship between the ELSP and other City codes, identifies subsequent development entitlements which may be required and their respective processing procedure, and describes a specific plan minor modification procedure. East Lake Spec Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 111-29 East Lake Specific Plan AMENDMENT SD( SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS Area of Amendment Section 9.1 .7 is added clarifying interpretation of residential category densities. Discussion Amendment Six adds the following sub-section to Section 9.1 , Administration: 9.1 .7 INTERPRETATION OF RESIDENTIAL CATEGORY DENSITIES Where a planning area has been given one of the four residential land use designations (RES i 2 3 or 4) the density assigned to that land use designation shall be construed as an average maximum density or yield for that planning area Individual development proiects within the planning area may exceed the allocated planning area density up to a maximum of 120% as Iona as other development projects within the same Manning area develop below the allocated density, resulting in the average development densi_ not exceeding the Manning areas assigned land use designation densi . (ELSP) 1. Amendments to Section XI -Specific Plan Appendices ELSP Summary This section of the ELSP contains Appendix A, the Governing Statistical Summary, which allocates a land use designation and intensity to all planning areas within the specific plan. Area of Amend[Dent SPA-6 amends those planning areas within the Recreation Village that are revised by the SPA-6 land use plan. Discussion A. Governing Statistical Summaty The following tables show the revised Planning Area numbering and statistical summary for the Amendment Six area only, a comparison of Planning Area changes from SPA 2 to Amendment Six, and a Governing Statistical Summary for the entire 3,000 acre Specific Plan area incorporating the Amendment Six changes. East Lake Speck Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 111-30 Amendment Six—Appendix A: Governing Statistical Summary ....706 Acre Amendment Area Only TARGET pLANNING' LAND USE DWELLING AVERAGE AREA CATEGORY ACREAGE UNITS DENSITY 20 O.S.(Goff Course) 122.2 — 21 O.S.(Habitat) 25 22 O.S.(GOLF COURSE) 62.7 23 O.S.(Buffer) 1&9 — 30 O-S_(Buffer) 51.9 — 31 RESIDENTIAL 1 43.2 259 6'0 32 RESIDENTIAL 1 50.7 304 6.0 34 RESIDENTIAL 1 39.7 238 6.0 35 RESIDENTIAL 1 28 168 6.0 36 RESIDENTIAL 1 47.8 286 6.0 37 RESIDENTIAL 1 35.1 210 6.0 39 RESIDENTIAL 1 41.8 250 6.0 40 RESIDENTIAL 1 27 162 6.0 41 RESIDENTIAL 1 (Proposed School Site) 13 78 6.0 42 O.S.(Park) 5.4 — — 44 O.S.(Park) 0.9 — 45 O.S.(Park) 1.0 — 46 O.S.(Recreation Club) 4 — 47FGENERA COMMERCIAL 11.7 — 48Clubhouse) 3 — 61 ) 1.0 -- 6 ) 9.510 ) 23.5 39.7SUB-T 706.7 1,966 6.0 East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services 0 0 (V a C oc! c! o o o m °° a) Q) Qo c4 0 Co (D (D (D 0 (D(D �- n:. uaioi° � a�o uoi (ND °D r � rn 1 OD CD r y � aP N r` O O N r- t- ao r ao M N O fNO � trflci' ti� MNNrC�7Nr � rO c- rrMM � rNM � Q U O E d U U rrrr .- r .r- •"' r E E `_ N '" l 4 N m m �j x o U "- U -,° ro m V cu w m m e4a omo > > ccccc � c � mamIrmC7 � aciaciacCimaaiaci C7 � C7mm (D a. ;o � v-�_Na-) iaYnI) vrarnl) -UOj'Cc4a9l)) l l l vca) -gva)i --aa) -o cA CD Cl) GD!JJ 000oO9w [� — ra n) acd7� wn �.�mN v�aw o.(a V J lA OOOOOtr � afafllw Z co co NODO OD Ci 4MOQ O of 4 6tiO4 w � Oa0 �Cn (D act NlCrNO NN �x J ip O UO (TraOOM (D CD M00r- CD V C7004 V) LO ■"" f` 67 � NMM (D � ~ �1' Cry Q Q' N co00NN � rv- a-- a- r (hM � �- NM PA fq b� � X_ N Qa O a) CL >fl W ' 2 w3 a) a) m a) (/ U r r N N r N N 0 0 0 0 t6 t0 D la (6 N D CO (U l0 (q @ CO U U U U co) CO N Q C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C O U a ;L7 'L7 -0 -0 "0 '0 ;a (L) a) w m U j (n In cn to (A m N in a N u) C C C C Cl) a c to to a in �n c N co) w au a) a) 111 cn a) a7 0 N 0 a) a) a) N N a) OOUOOcr � � � ww0 (90 (Dd00 rx � C� c� wff0www 0� a� arNMC) u7 (Dh- OorNM "T �T. i- M "tLOLLOU') MfiLoL COC) CLA Z NNNNMMMMMMMM � Cf V � V CI UJJ a 4 O N m CO 100 N ao m OR N I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I m a� m a0 > A t0 a cornM � O )` v (o cr0 (o � CALN � CD0) I I ! I I M I I ! CO 00 Nr � ajNN 'qNNNIn -TMC204 - CA In (nr � C a (O �D tp CQ CD <D C() (O 76 ro 4waaw � aaa W W C .c .C .fi fi W .C . m © 3 E m ro w m a) E m m m Q W UC,4 � MN ,riN � N � E E -Q Q -Q aZ E -Q -Q .0 M U ro tb �°ci ci mia o @@ @ @fomm @ @ � c c c c c c c a) W W W S z a- a- -o -o m � Q Q rq � W Q W , Q Q � m ai � � a`�i ai ai � '� a�i a) m a� (ricpv; v) � UJ � � Q � o 0 6 0 o aa) cQ, Ucx � 00 � [ you'� � c a � o000UoQC7viozzzzz0zzz � w r r, o P Ln q Q � J I CO �— � CO Nmao ao N c tiaiuiuic�i � ruico (im co I H � P _ M P LLI Co '�' d' E` O ti m ! N CO ! ! I I ! I I ! ! O m OOD ! I ! ! U) K% a) O (flrnM VNPI"V• CoV' O (O q* M N o) CfJ6�i0Ot- (oioLomI-- MMLo00CD � NN - - - NNIT CANNLn MlOp,;- �S a •� x Q � a � 4 — m m fi U a W W C E 0cli - - - -• MN ujN � Nr � � E E t9 fD @ ca @ (0 la �C @ @ @ @ w `-Y.. w U ` U (@// 41 N U w +�+ C a) O C C C C C C C a C C C C = Z Q. Q. @ �].. @ _ D � C7 W Q) W a) m W a) W W W W N 4.� o a a o o v v o v g W d W W W m a) ate) W a U (/j in u) a) a .N '� . (0 �o - • - U a) W a) a) W W W W W W 00000OUO7A � � � 0 � 700LQ' wQ� Qxwowmwxaf L� mQ o0 W0 �- C-4Co q COI-- aoPC � C*40 i� aDO0000C70ClCDaQ - �- `►� "� p) EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN - APPENDIX A GOVERNING STATISTICAL SUMMARY TARGET PLAfiINING l AN© SE'., ACREAGE DWELLlNC3 AVERAGE AREA' CATEGQRY iJNITS [3ENSITY.. MARINA DISTRICT 1 Residential 56 j1235 4.2 2 Residential2 33 6.1 3 Mixed-Use 34 Residential3 17 18.4 5 Residential 13 114 8-8 6 Mixed-Use 7 62 8.8 Residential 2 7 O.S. Park 6 — 8 Mixed-Use 12 221 18.4 (Residential 3) 9 Mixed-Use 4 — 10 O.S. (Marinal 9.5 — 11 O.S. Park 32 ~- 12 O.S. Park 32 - J 13 Residential 13 55 4.2 14 Residential 21 88 4.2 15 Residential 4 74 18.4 16 O.S. Park 2 - 17 O.S. Natural 27 — 18 O.S. (Park) 6 19 O.S. Park 9 24 O.S. Park 5 25 Residential 44 190 4.3 26 O.S. Lake 8 -- 27 Residential2 36 318 8.8 28 Residential 21 187 8.8 29 Residential 41 152 3.7 85 General Commercial 1 -- 95 Generai Commercial 8 -- 113 O.S. (Habitat) 5 — Roads 87 — ntals 562.5 2,2k2 6.9" East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC #RGP Planning&Development Services EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN - APPENDIX A GOVERNING STATISTICAL SUMMARY TARGET PLANNING' "LAND USE " ACREAGE. DWELiLfNG AVERAGE AREA, "` CATEGORY. "; UNi I?S DENS11'Y ; RECREATION VILLAGE 20 O.S. Golf Course 122.2 -- 21 O.S. Habitat 25 - - 22 O.S. Golf Course 62.7 -- - 23 O.S. Buffer 18.9 - - 30 O.S. Buffer 51.9 - - 31 Residential 43.2 259 6.0 32 Residential 50.7 304 6.0 34 Resid mbal 1 391 238 6.0 35 Residential 28 168 6.0 36 Residential 47.8 286 6.0 37 Residential 35.1 210 6.0 39 Residential 41.8 250 6.0 40 Residential 27 162 6.0 41 Residential 1 School site 13 78 6.0 42 O.S. Park 5.4 --- --• 43 General Commercial 12 -- 44 O.S. Park 0•9 - 45 O.S. Park 1 46 O.S. Recreation Club 4 - - 47 General Commercial 11.7 -- 48 O.S. Golf Clubhouse 3 - 49 General Commercial 4 -- -- 50 Residential 13.5 51 3.8 51 Residential 19 148 7.8 52 Residential 31 119 3.8 53 General Commercial 30 - -- 54 Residential2 40 313 7.8 55 Residential 19 321 16.9 56 Residential 23 389 16.9 57 Residential 36 100 2.8 58 O.S. Golf Course 86 -- -- 59 Residential 29 226 7.8 60 Residential 13 37 3A 61 O.S. Park 1 - - 62 O.S. Park 9.5 - - 63 Residential 20 77 3.8 64 Residential 27 455 16.9 65 Residential 44 313 7.1 66 O.S. Park 26 - - 67 Existing Res. Res. 1 24 100 4.2 68 Residential 20 156 7.8 69 Residential 56 214 3.8 70 Residential 44 344 7.8 71 Residential 59 187 3.2 72 O.S. Habitat 105 - -- 73 O.S. Natural 22 - - 96 O.S. Park 11 - 97 O.S. Park 1 - - 98 General Commercial 9 - - East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN - APPENDIX A GOVERNING STATISTICAL SUMMARY PLAN{YING LAND USA ACREAGE DWELLING AVERAGE AREI# CATEGORY <'-UN1TS. DENSITY Recreation Villa a(continued) 99 O.S. Park 5 J 100 A.U.A. 197 101 General Commercial 16 102 S.A.U. 19 — 103 O.S. Park 23.5 — — 104 Not A livable in SPA 6 --- — — 105 Not ApAicable in SPA 6 — — — 106 Not A licable in SPA 6 -- — — 107 Not Ap licable in SPA 6 — — -- 108 Not Applicable in SPA 6 — 109 General Commercial 3 — 110 Not A licable in SPA 6 -- ill Not Applicable in SPA 6 -- -- 112 Not Applicable in SPA 6 — — — Roads 68 TotaRs- 1798,5 East Lake Speck Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN - APPENDIX A GOVERNING STATISTICAL SUMMARY TARGET 1'l AnitulNG LAND USE—' ACREAGE DWELL fNG AVERAGE AREA CATEGORY.: UNITS DENSITY, LAKESIDE RESORT 33 Residential 21 59 2.8 38 O.S_ Park 1 — 74 O.S. Natural 33 -- -- 75 O.S. Park 81 — 76 Commercial Park 18 — — 77 O.S. Marina 8 J 78 O.S. Park 10 -- 79 Commercial Park 7 — 80 Commercial Park 6 ` 81 Residential 12 34 2.8 82 O.S. Lake 2 — 83 Residential 18 50 2.8 84 Residential 28 50 1.8 93 Residential 23 65 2.8 94 Wetlands Mitigation Area 356 -- Roads 15 — — EAST LAKE SpECIF1C PLAN SPA 6 GOVERNING STATISTICAL SUMMARY TARGET VILLAGE ACREAGE DWELLING AVERAGE UNITS DENSITY Marina District 562.5 2,212 6.9 Summary Recreation Village 1,798.5 5,505 6.5 Lakeside Resort 639 258 2.5 Totals Note: Average densities calculated on residential acreage only. Gross density calculated on the entire 3,000 acre plan area equals 2.7 du/ac. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-OP Lake Elsinore LLC •RGP Planning&Development Services APPENDIX C EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN CONTENT AND AMENDMENT REFERENCE Appendix C is intended to provide a contextual reference for the current SPA-6 proposal and to provide guidance to find the applicable document for the various topical areas of the East Lake Specific Plan, as it has been amended in a serial fashion. This is achieved in two ways: First, Appendix C briefly summarizes the original 1993 Specific Plan approval and the subsequent SPA-1 and SPA-2 approvals for the area which comprises SPA-6. Second, the content reference matrix included in Appendix C provides a quick reference to all sections of the 1993 Specific Plan and indicates where amendments have been adopted. This matrix provides direction for locating specific content areas and within which document they can be found. SPA-6, as well as its two amendment predecessors, does not contain all sections of the adopted East Lake Specific Plan, only those sections amended or added to the previously approved 1993 document. In order to simplify implementation of this Specific Plan, the sections of SPA-1 and SPA-2 which have not been superseded have been incorporated into the SPA-6 document. For ease of administration, this results in only two documents containing all approved plans and regulations regarding development within the overall 3,000 acre Specific Plan area: The 1993 ELSP and SPA-6 documents. The matrix within this appendix is intended to provide guidance in referring to various topical sections of the East Lake Specific Plan, and within which document they can be found. The matrix is organized by the major chapters or sections of the 1993 ELSP. As SPA-1 , SPA-2 and SPA-6 all address the same portion of the East Lake Specific Plan, SPA-6 largely supersedes and/or replaces the two previous amendments. Only a few sections of the previous amendments are still valid and have been incorporated into SPA-6. These sections are listed in this appendix for reference. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC•RGP Planning&Development Services 1993 EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN The East Lake Specific Plan (ELSP), adopted by the City in 1993, is a master planned community designed to reinforce the recreational resort image of the City. It encompasses approximately 3,000 acres at the east end of the lake and was initially approved for 9,000 units of mixed residential products, commercial, and open space uses oriented to the lake. It was planned to be consistent with the Lake Elsinore Management Project which was designed to stabilize the lake and define the flood storage and habitat preservation needs within the Specific Plan area. Three principal concepts or objectives formed the basis of the 1993 plan: • Recreational orientation • District level planning, and • Environmentally sensitive planning These objectives were addressed in the plan by the inclusion of recreational features, the establishment of three major development districts, and preservation of significant habitat area. Three development districts formed a major organizing element of the plan, each to be developed with its own character and orientation. These districts were called the Marina District, the Lakeside Resort District, and the Recreational Village District. The ELSP included a Conceptual Phasing Plan with five phases. Phase One, which was the focus of SPA-1 & SPA-2, was allocated a residential yield of 2,914 units. Land use allocation over the 3,000 acre plan is shown below in Table 1 B from the Project Summary section of the ELSP. TABLE 1 B PROJECT SUMMARY OVERVIEW Land Use Category Acres % of Dwelling Total Acres Units Residential 1 ,241 .5 41 8,309 Commercial 414 14 466' Special Alternative Use 58.5 2 225 Open Space 1 ,111 .0 37 Master-Planned Roads 175.0 6 3,000 100 91000 Note: ' Dwelling units located in Mixed-use areas. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC•RGP Planning&Development Services AMENDMENT ONE - SPA-1 Amendment One (SPA-1) to the East Lake Specific Plan was adopted in 1998. SPA-1 was focused on the area that is essentially Phase One as defined in the ELSP. SPA-1 basically redefined the developable land area and open space within the 706.7 acre amendment area in response to flood storage requirements. This reconfiguration resulted in an increase in open space (the majority of the westerly portion of Phase One), a reduction in development area in the Phase One area, and a reduction in the overall yield or holding capacity of the ELSP from 9,000 units to 7,966 units. The SPA-1 area was allocated a residential yield of 1 ,880 units. As a part of the open space expansion, a natural wetlands mitigation/multi-habitat corridor was established along the historic alignment of the San ,Jacinto River. The land use allocation changes within the SPA-1 area from the 1993 plan are shown below in Table 2 from the Project Description section of SPA-1 . Additional plan amendments incorporated into SPA-1 include roadway alignment and street width modifications. The Diamond Drive alignment was jogged westerly at Malaga Road before turning southerly again to create an indirect route through the SPA-1 area. Collector and Restricted Local Street sections were also reduced in width, providing for narrower streets within the SPA-1 area. Lastly, SPA-1 also reconfigured the Recreational Village District boundary (as established in the ELSP) to coincide with the Phase One area and the Lehr Option property which constituted the majority of Phase One. TABLE 2 PROJECT SUMMARY OVERVIEW AMENDMENT AREA ONLY Land Use East Lake S P Phase l SPA 1 Category % Total % Total Acres Acres Units Acres Acres Units Residential 311 44% 2 703 217.7 31% 1 510 Commercial 31 5% 31 4% Mixed Use 24 3% 211 23 3% 370 Open Space 232 33% 403 57% Stadium 58.5 8% 0 0 Roads 50.2 7% 32 5% TOTAL 706.7 l 00% 2,914 706.7 100% 1,880 East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC•RGP Planning&Development Services With the adoption of SPA-6, the SPA-1 document will be superseded in its entirety with the exception of the following SPA-1 sections which address the Land Use District boundary changes. These sections remain valid and are incorporated into the SPA-6 document. • Section M.B. - Land Use Districts Pg. 11-12 • Figure 5 - Conceptual District Plan Pg. 13 East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC•RGP Planning&Development Services AMENDMENT TWO - SPA-2 Amendment Two (SPA-2) to the East Lake Specific Plan was adopted in 1999. SPA-2 covers the same area as SPA-1 (the Phase One area of the ELSP) and incorporates mostly minor revisions to the SPA-1 concept including minor land use modifications within the development portion of the SPA area to slightly increase the residential yield of the SPA-2 area. SPA-2 allocates 1 ,947 residential units to the SPA-2 area. The most significant change incorporated into SPA-2 was the inclusion of Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND) development regulations to facilitate traditional neighborhood designed development. Additional plan amendments incorporated into SPA-2 include roadway designation changes (GPA) and open space modifications. A General Plan Amendment accompanied SPA-2 to adopt a reduced roadway designation for Diamond Drive southerly of Malaga Road. The GP designation was changed from a 4-lane Major to a 2-lane Collector with a reduced section width. The configuration of the open space area was modified to reflect a "Wetlands Enhancement Plan" which basically lengthened and widened the historic San Jacinto River corridor to create an enhanced wetlands mitigation area. The sequence of land use allocation changes within the SPA-2 area from the 1993 ELSP plan through the SPAR changes to the SPA-2 plan are shown in the following table. AMENDMENT AREA COMPARISON Land Use Fast Lake S P Phase 1 SPA l SPA 2 Category % % % Acres Total Units Acres Total Units Acres Total Units Acres Acres Acres Residential 311 44% 2,703 217.7 31% 1,510 212 30% 1,577 Commercial 31 5% 31 4% 31 5% Mixed Use 24 3% 211 23 3% 370 30 4% 370 Open $ ace 232 33% 403 57% 412 58% Stadium 58.5 8% 0 0 0 0 Roads 50.2 7% 32 5% 21.7 3% TOTAL 706.7 100% 2,914 706.7 100% 1,880 706.7 100% 1,947 East Lake Speck Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC•RGP Planning&Development Services With the adoption of SPA-6, the SPA-2 document will be superseded in its entirety with the exception of the following SPA-2 sections which address grading standards, definitions, and commercial development regulations. These sections remain valid and are incorporated into the SPA-6 document. • Section V.5.1 .6 - Grading Development Standards Pg. 19-20 • Section VII.B.7.3 - Revisions to Definitions • 7.3.17 - Garage Apartment Pg. 36 East Lake Specific Plan Amendment Six July, 2004 Laing-OP Lake Elsinore LLG•RGP Planning&Development Services EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN Document Section Content and Amendment Summary Reference Matrix 1NTRODUCTI4lV KAmended 00 ac. Project SummaryELSP 2.2 roject Summa Overview Table SPA-6 III.A an Goals & PoliciesELSP 2.6 an Legal EntitlementsELSP 2 7 QTHER P1_ANNING MEAS(JRES enan ConsistencyELSP 3 1 Redevelopment Plan Consistency ELSP 3.2 Lake Elsinore Management Project Consistenc ELSP 3.3 'aPPORTUNITIES&:CONSTRAINTS Opportunities & Constraints ELSP 4.3 THE PLAN Land Use Plan & District Descriptions ELSP 5 1 1 Amended District Descriptions & Boundaries SPA-6 III.E Land Use Descriptions ELSP 5.1.1.c Vehicular Circulation ELSP 5.1.2 Amended Circulation Plan (alignment& sections) SPA-6 III.E,2 Overall Drainage Plan ELSP 5.1.3 Amended Drainage Plan — Phase One SPA-6 III.E.3_a Overall Water& Sewer Plans ELSP 5.1.4 Amended Water& Sewer Plans -- Phase One SPA-6 III.E.3.b Public Services ELSP 5.1.5 Overall Grading Plan ELSP 5.1.6 Revised Grading Development Standards SPA-6 111,E.5 Amended Grading Plan — Phase One SPA-6 III.E.5 Overall Open Space Plan ELSP 5.1.7 Amended Open Space Pan— Phase One SPA-6 III.E.6 Overall Phasing Plan ELSP 5.2 Amendment Area Phasing Plan SPA-6 111.E.7 Maintenance Responsibilities ELSP 5.3 DESIGN.GUIDELINES Community De.sign Guidelines ELSP 6.2 Overall Landscape Guidelines ELSP 6.3 Amended landscape Guidelines street sections SPA-6 111.F.1 Overall Architectural Guidelines ELSP 6.4 ELSP—East Lake Specific Plan, adopted 1993 SPA-6—Amendment Six, adopted 2004 EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN Content and Amendment Summary Reference Matrix Document Section DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Development Regulations Definitions ELSP 7.3 Amended Street Definitions SPA-6 III.G.1 Residential Development Regulations ELSP 7.4 Amended Residential Development Regulations SPA-6 III.G.2 Commercial Development Regulations ELSP & 7.5 SPA-6 Parking Requirements ELSP 7.8 Sign Regulations ELSP 7.9 Landscape Regulations ELSP 7.10 Amended Landscape Regulations SPA-6 III.G.3 W'PLEMENTATlDN, , 7777 Implementation Fin ancing ELSP 8.1 ADMINISMAT10N 0l!THE SPECfFIC PLAN Subsequent Development Entitlements ELSP 9.2 Subsequent Entitlement Processing ELSP 9.3 Subsequent Approvals Relationship to EIR ELSP 9.4 Specific Plan Amendment Procedures ELSP 9.5 APPENDICES Governin g Statistical Summa ELSP Xi.A Amended Governing Statistical Summaries SPA-6 III.J ELSP—East Lake Specific Plan, adopted 1993 SPA-6—Amendment Six, adopted 2004 ROADWAY DESIGN SUMMARY General Plan ELSP SPA-2 SPA-6 Diamond Dr. Diamond Dr. Malaga Rd. Malaga Rd. _Malaga Rd. Malaga Rd. 4 lanes, 100' R-O-W 4 lanes, 100' R-O-W 4 lanes, 100' R-O-W 4 lanes, 100' R-O-W 1 10' 1 40' 1 40' 1 10' , 80, -� Major iv, 1 33' 1 14' 1 33, 1 10, i 110' I 33, 1 14' 1 33' 1 10' i 10, 40' 40' -- 100, Highway 80, -- } 80' 80, 100, —j 100, 100, Diamond Dr. 4 lanes, 112' R-O-W I 16' I 33' 1 14' 1 33' 1 16' 1 80' 112' Diamond Dr. 2 lanes, 68' R-O-W 2 lanes, 60-68' R-O-W 2 lanes, 70' R-O-W 2 lanes, 74' R-O-W 8' 1 20' 1 14' 1 - 20' 1 8' i 10' 10' 10' 40-48' 10' 54 13' 19' 10' 19' 13' � —� �Collector —_ _... ----.---48' �- 60 - 68' 70' ,,8, 4, Street 68' Collector 2 lanes, 62' R-O-W 12' 12' 38' — I 62' APPENDIX FIGURE A-1 a ROADWAY DESIGN SUMMARY ROADWAY DESIGN SUMMARY ELS P SPA-2 SPA-6 19' 18' 10' 18' 19' 10' 10' 12' 12' Local _ 46'.,._______j Street 40' 38' 84' 60' 62' 2 Lanes 18' 18' 36' �-- 72' 9 Versions of Restricted Local Streets Ranging From 15' 8' Restricted 10' 110' 38' 61 1 6' Local 36' ' 61' 36' Street 56' To 48' 2 Lanes 10' 10' 26' 46' APPENDIX FIG U RE A-1 b ROADWAY DESIGN SUMMARY GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT JOHN LAING HOMES EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN - AMENDMENT SIX GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT JuLY, 2004 OVERVIEW John Laing Homes is the applicant for Amendment Six to the East Lake Specific Plan, as adopted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council June 8, 1993. Over the past 10 years, the entire back basin planning area has been restudied and the specific plan has been amended five times by previous land owners and development proponents. In this instance, John Laing Homes intends to seek City Council approval of an amendment to the Specific Plan to reflect a modified development program for the first phase of this specific plan, and to commence construction related activities immediately thereafter. As a part of the entitlement program in advance of development, it is also necessary to accompany Specific Plan Amendment Six with a General Plan Circulation Element Amendment application. DISCUSSION As the plans and engineering have evolved for the initial 706-acre Phase One development of the overall 3,000-acre specific plan site, the need has arisen to modify the General Plan Circulation Element. Specifically, but not exclusively, the amendment focuses on Diamond Drive. John Laing Homes' request essentially reverses the General Plan Amendment for Diamond Drive approved by the City Council in 1998 for the previously proposed Liberty community. Unlike the earlier amendment to Diamond Drive, this proposal does not change the spirit and intent of the June 1993 East Lake Plan, and does not propose to reduce the flow of traffic, reduce the LOS goal, or to create friction that might effect travel efficiency. Specific Plan Amendment Six (SPA 6) will maintain the circulation objectives of the East Lake Specific Plan which promotes a variety of transportation options working together to form an efficient and comprehensive circulation system. The circulation JOHN LAING HOMES EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN-AMENDMENT SIX GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT PAGE 2 OF 5 network of the first phase planning area interconnects with the surrounding East Lake Specific Plan roadway components to create a safe and efficient street network in which regionally-oriented traffic is separated from local neighborhood traffic. Refinements to the adopted General Plan circulation program are necessitated by the revised land use patterns offered by John Laing Homes in the SPA 6 designs, and by the desire to base the development program on a conventional residential neighborhood pattern rather than the Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND). The TND concept was the core vision for this community under the principles of both SPA 1 and SPA 2 (Liberty). This change in development concept and theme results in two principal types of circulation plan amendments: 1) Modifications to Major Highway alignments (Diamond Drive southerly of Malaga), and, 2) Elimination of narrowed street sections to accommodate TND design objectives incorporated into those previous specific plan amendments. The principal types of changes are described as follows: MODIFIED ROAD WAYALIGNMENT Diamond Drive was originally a Major Highway in the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Circulation Element (pre-SPA 2). The City Council yielded to the request of the developer in SPA 2 to reduce the classification of Diamond Drive from a Major to a special design Collector. The SPA 6 design incorporates a return to Major Highway status for Diamond Drive, and modifies the alignment of Diamond Drive south of Malaga Road to remove the off-set extension of Diamond Drive and the embedded roundabout. The amended alignment creates a continuous extension of Diamond Drive southerly of Malaga to the southeasterly boundary of the SPA 6 Phase One area where it will connect to the extended alignment of Diamond Drive southerly as established in SPA 1. This modified alignment is shown in Figure 1, Circulation Plan. This re-alignment of Diamond Drive southerly of Malaga Road is consistent with the General Plan intent to provide a connection to the future extension of Bundy Canyon Road. The Diamond Drive reclassification and re-alignment is a return to the fundamentals of an efficient functional-based roadway network without its JoHN LAING HOMES EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN-AMENDMENT SIX GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT PAGE 3 OF 5 objective being to increase traffic friction as was the theme of SPA 1 and Spa 2 (Liberty). The re-alignment of Diamond Drive is intended to facilitate a more efficient traffic flow southerly through the new community. As Diamond Drive is a General Plan circulation facility, this re-alignment requires a concurrent General Plan Amendment (GPA) to maintain consistency between the East Lake Specific Plan and the General Plan. New Collector Street alignments are proposed to serve the various neighborhoods of the SPA 6 area. These Collectors are designed to connect neighborhoods to Diamond Drive and to Mission Trail to distribute traffic out to the greater Lake Elsinore community, established commercial centers, public facilities, and the City's downtown. Alignments and connections have been modified according to the SPA 6 modified land use plan, but reflect the circulation concepts in SPA 2. The Collector Streets are shown in plan view in Figure 1. STREET SECT/QNS SPA 6 eliminates the "reduced" Collector Street designation for Diamond Drive southerly of Malaga Road and returns its designation to Major Highway, consistent with the General Plan. In addition, other "reduced" Collector Street sections established by SPA 1 and SPA-2 are eliminated and the basic street section standards contained within Section 5.1.2.a of the 1993 East Lake Specific Plan are re-established , with two exceptions as discussed below. Modified Major Highway section: Diamond Drive within the SPA 6 area is modified to have a 112 foot R-O-W allowing for a 4-lane facility with median, but with expanded landscape parkways and median width. A half street section will include a 14 foot landscaped median, 27 foot travel lanes, 6 foot bike lane, 10 foot landscaped parkway, 6 foot sidewalk to the edge of the R-O-W, and 16 foot landscaped parkway adjacent to but outside of the R-O-W. The amended Major Highway section (Diamond Drive) is shown in the attached Figure A-1a, Roadway Design Summary, from the draft East Lake Specific Plan Amendment 6 document. JOHN LAING HOMES EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN-AMENDMENT SIX GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT PAGE d OF 5 This section provides the same pavement and median width as the General Plan standard for Major Highways but provides for a wider right-of-way. • Modified Collector Street section: Collector streets within SPA 6 are modified to have a 74 foot R-O-W allowing for a 2-lane facility with median, with expanded landscaped parkways. A half street section will include a 10 foot landscaped median, 13 foot travel lane, 6 foot bike lane, 8 foot landscaped parkway, 5 foot sidewalk to the edge of the R- 0-W, and 12 foot landscaped parkway adjacent to but outside of the R- 0-W. The amended Collector Street section is shown in Figure A-1a, Roadway Design Summary, from the draft East Lake Specific Plan Amendment 6 document. This section provides the same pavement width as the General Plan standard for Collector Streets (including a landscaped median) but provides for a wider right-of-way. These two exceptions apply to the SPA-6 amendment area only. CONCLUSION The requested General Plan Amendment re-establishes the integrity of the functional classification system intended by the Circulation Element. The effect of this change is that the East Lake community is again reunited with the rest of the circulation network for the remainder of the City and region. Whereas the Liberty program attempted to create a non-automotive circulation system based on "10-minute walk" neighborhoods, such a system is counter-productive to a conventional development and comprehensive city planning. Unlike the community envisioned under SPA 1 and SPA 2, the plan for John Laing Homes (SPA 6) intends to blend into the City as opposed to stand off from the rest of the City. Approval of the subject requests eliminates the offset created for Diamond Drive so that it transitions across Malaga in a southerly vector without the westerly jog. It further eliminates the roundabout created to transition the roadway network from a 100-foot right-of-way down to an 88-foot right-of-way, and then down to a 70-foot JOHN LAING HOMES EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN-AMENDMENT SIX GENERAL PLAN CIRCuiATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT PAGE 5 OF 5 right-of-way. The current proposal provides for Diamond Drive to continue southerly across Malaga as the General Plan had originally been scribed in 1992, and is generally within the alignment proposed in the '93 East Lake Specific Plan, a plan more universally understood and accepted by the citizens of Lake Elsinore. The General Plan Circulation Element requests are based on community aesthetics and not on limitations to traffic flow or travel lane widths. The modifications sought to the standards and profiles tend to be based on an urban design philosophy that encourages added width for parkways and landscape elements. This is done by adding to the standard design rather than taking the exceptional landscape area from the travel lanes. Thus, the request is for an enhancement to the streets instead of a claim that the streets detract from community design goals. Approval of the modification providing for re-establishment of Diamond Drive to a Major Highway classification is positive to traffic flow for the region. This action would return the arterial capacity back from a design ADT of 7,500-to-11,500 with two travel lanes up to the City standard of 32,000-to-42,000 ADT in four travel lanes. Further, it raises the design speed back up from 25 MPH to 40 MPH. Lastly, the modification ensures that the City design standard of no less than LOS "D" can be maintained. This LOS was not a commitment in the former design and alignment. The same results will be visited upon the Collector and Local streets through enhancements to the standard sections. The functional classification will be restored, and the comfort and aesthetic experience of traveling along a roadway with enhanced parkways, medians and landscaping will have no ill effect on the purpose, design speeds, levels of service or other measure of efficiency. >:.,...,.._. ::..::..u.:.:;=..: .•....fur,:,:::.:.:r:'!�. i'j f, -' r ,PROJECT LOCATION ,s r'• .r t A ` s x LEGEND - MODIFIED MAJOR (4—LANE) — (I12) m MODIFIED COLLECTOR (2—LANE) — (74') John Laing Homes General Plan Amendment - East Lake Specific Plan FIGURE 1 CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT ROADWAY DESIGN SUMMARY General Plan ELSP SPA-2 SPA-6 Diamond Dr. Diamond Dr. Malaga Rd. Malaga Rd. Malaga Rd. Malaga Rd. 4 lanes, 100' R-O-W 4 lanes, 100' R-O-W 10' aa' 1 40' 10' 4 lanes, 100' R-O-W 4 lanes, 100' R-O-W � 80' Major 10' 33' 14' 33' 10' 33' 14' 33' 10, 40' 40' 100' Highway ; 80, ; 80, 80' 100' I 100' 100, Diamond Dr. 4 lanes, 112' R-O-W 1 16' I 33' 1 14' 1 33' I 16' I 80, 112' Diamond Dr. 2 lanes, 68' R-O-W 2 lanes, 60-68' R-O-W 2 lanes, 70' R-O-W 2 lanes, 74' R-O-W 8' 20' 1 14' 1 20' 1 8' 10, 10' 10' 140-48' 10' 13' 19' 1 10' 19 13' 54' 48 Collector 48' Ir- 60 - 6s' I r 70' , Street I 68' --.� 74 Collector 2 lanes, 62' R-O-W 12' 112' 38' I 62' APPENDIX FIGURE A-1 a ROADWAY DESIGN SUMMARY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.6,GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-04,AND AMENDED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PLANNING DIVISION General Conditions 1, The Draft East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 shall be revised to incorporate any corrections and changes required by the Planning Commission and/or City Council. A Final East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 document shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director or designee within 30 days of approval by the City Council. No permit shall be issued until the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 document and any required revisions are administratively approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 2. The current overflow parking area will continue to be designated General Commercial and will be available for use as an overflow parking lot until such time as other parking facilities have been created in the vicinity of the stadium. 3. The applicant shall construct or pay for the reasonable cost of construction of an eight-foot decorative block wall at the top of the grass berm near the stadium for noise attenuation. 4. Residences backing onto Malaga Road and along the southerly extension of Diamond Drive for distance of 1,300 feet from the current stadium public address system speakers shall implement the following design measures: • Window glazing shall approximate an STC rating of 28 for all windows in habitable rooms on the rear or side elevations of affected residences. • All roof mounted or gable end-located attic vents shall be baffled. • The applicant shall be responsible for all disclosures to buyers of residences regarding potential noise sources located near future residences. 5. The Final East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 document shall select the design alternative for the Multi-Use Park and Overflow Parking Lot for the Diamond Stadium which locates the overflow parking lot closer to the stadium (Figure 21 A, from the Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 document). 6. Future development shall comply with those standards and guidelines contained in the Land Use Plan, Circulation Plan, Drainage Plan, Water and Sewer Plan, Dry Utilities Plan, Open Space Plan, Development Regulations, Design Guidelines, and Implementation Plan as contained in the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 document. 7. Those issues, standards, guidelines, etc. not addressed in the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 document and/or the 1993 Specific Plan will revert to the City Municipal Code and/or Zoning Code as of the date established by the 2004 Amended Development Agreement. 8. The applicant shall provide all project-related onsite and offsite improvements as described in the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 document. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.6,GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-04,AND AMENDED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Continued) 9. All future development in accordance with the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 document shall require Planning Commission and City Council consideration and approval of Tentative Tract Map(s)and Design Review application(s). 10, The applicant shall implement appropriate mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Programs for the original 1993 East Lake Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report and the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6. 11. All future proposals shall be reviewed by the City on a project-by-project basis. If determined necessary by the Community Development Director or designee, additional environmental analysis will be required. 12. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and shall cease at 7:00 PM, Monday through Saturday. Construction activity shall not take place on Sunday or any Legal Holidays. 13. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, Agents, and its Consultants from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, Consultants or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning implementation and construction of the East Lake Specific Plan, which action is bought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and/or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully with the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, or proceeding, the applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 14. The applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department. 15. The applicant shall comply with those conditions of approval required by the Fire Department (see attached). The attached conditions require implementation prior to Final Map recordation, Grading Permit issuance, or Building Permit issuance. Major conditions include: • The applicant shall participate in the Development Impact Fee Program as adopted by the City of Lake Elsinore, as of the date established by the 2004 Amended Development Agreement. • All water mains and fire hydrants shall be constructed in accordance with Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 and/or No. 787.1. • Prepare a Fuel Modification Plan, subject to approval by the Fire Department. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 6,GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-04,AND AMENDED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Continued) • The Homeowner's Association shall be responsible for implementing the Fuel Modification Plan. • The project shall provide an alternate or secondary access. 16. Future development shall comply with those requirements and provisions contained in the 2004 Amended Development Agreement between the City and Laing Homes. All references to the 1994 Amended Development Agreement shall be 2004. 17. All Conditions of Approval are subject to the terms and limitations of the 2004 Amended Development Agreement between the City of Lake Elsinore and Laing Homes. Dior to Final Tract Map_A proval 18. All lots shall comply with applicable standards contained in the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 document and Municipal and Zoning Codes. 19. A precise survev with closures for boundaries and all lots shall be provided per the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 20. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Designee. 21. All of the improvements shall be designed by the applicant's Civil Engineer to the specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore. 22. Prior to approval of the Final Map or if deemed appropriate by the Community Development Director or designee, prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall initiate and complete the formation of a Homeowner's Association, approved by the City, recorded, and in place. All Association documents shall be approved by City Planning and Engineering and the City Attorney and recorded, such as the Articles of Incorporation for the Association; and Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs). At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall include language to ensure the HOA shall maintain landscaping along parkways and project streets, recreational areas, walkways, drainage easements, all right-of-way landscaping, medians, slopes, walls, and focal parks. 23. Prior to Final Map approval, the applicant shall submit a Detailed Phasing, Improvement and Phasing Plan for the entire Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 area, subject to approval by the Community Development Director and Engineering Manager, or designee. Prior to Design Review Approval 24. Future construction shall meet all Riverside County Fire Department standards for fire protection and any additional requirements requested by the Fire Department. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 6, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-04,AND AMENDED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Continued) 25. AlI future structural development associated with the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6, including subdivision maps require separate Design Review approval. 26. The applicant (master developer) shall prepare a Community-Wide Wall Plan for the entire East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 area. Said plan shall show that decorative, masonry, concrete block walls will be constructed around the boundaries of each phased area. 27. The applicant (master developer) shall prepare a signage program which illustrates community theme signage, directional signs, monuments,etc. Prior to Gradin Permit Issuance 28. The applicant shall obtain all necessary State and Federal permits, approvals, or other entitlements, where applicable,prior to each phase of development of the project. 29. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit a final grading plan, subject to all requirements of the City Grading Ordinance to the City Engineer for approval. Said grading plan shall address those grading standards and guidelines contained in the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 document. 30. Grading shall not be permitted outside the area of the designated project boundary unless appropriate approvals have been obtained. 31. Grading easements shall be coordinated with affected property owners. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit,grading and construction plans shall incorporate erosion control measures. 33. Any alterations to the topography, ground surface, or any other site preparation activity will require appropriate grading permits. A Geologic Soils Report with associated recommendations will be required for grading permit approval, and all grading must meet the City's Grading Ordinance, subject to the approval of the City Engineering Manager and the Planning Division. Interim and permanent erosion control measures are required. The applicant shall bond 100 percent for material and labor for one year for erosion control landscaping at the time the site is rough graded. Prior to Buildinr Permit Issuance 34. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Redevelopment Agency to either provide affordable units in accordance with the provisions of the California Redevelopment Law, appropriate in-lieu-of fees,or a combination of both. 35. The applicant shall annex into Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I to offset the cost of the City maintaining the street lighting. As indicated, the HOA shall maintain all right-of-way landscaping, medians, parkways, slopes and focal parks. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 6,GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-04,AND AMENDED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Continued) 36. The applicant shall annex into Community Facilities District 2003-01 related to the City- Wide Community Facilities District for Public Safety to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City. 37. The applicant shall pay all appropriate traffic impact mitigation fees as of the date established by the 2004 Amended Development Agreement, 38. The applicant shall pay appropriate TUMF fees or construct the necessary improvements along the I-15 Freeway at Railroad Canyon Road and acquire approval for any TUMF reimbursement from WRCOG,RCTC,and the City. 39. The applicant shall comply with the following City programs: the City Source Reduction and Recycling Element and Household Hazardous Waste Element, the County Solid Waste Management Plan and Integrated Waste Management Plan. 40. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall submit a letter of verification (will- serve letter)to the City Engineer,for all required utility services. 41. The applicant shall meet all requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). 42. The applicant shall pay applicable fees and obtain proper clearance from the Lake Elsinore Unified School District(LEUSD)prior to issuance of building permits. 43. Pay all applicable fees including park fees. 44. The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer for each lot within any subdivision. No service laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and shall be delineated on engineering sewer plans and profiles for submittal to the EVMWD. 45. Prior to issuance of building permits for each future tract, the applicant or merchant builder for each individual tract shall prepare a Final Wall and Fence Plan addressing the following: • Show that decorative, masonry, concrete block walls will be constricted around each tract. • Show materials, colors,and heights of side yard fences for proposed lots. • Show that all front return walls shall be decorative masonry block walls_ Front return wood fences shall not be permitted. • Show that side walls for corner lots shall be decorative masonry block walls. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 6, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-04,AND AMENDED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Continued) 46. The applicant shall submit plans to the electric utility company for a layout of the street lighting system. The cost of street lighting, installation as well as energy charges shall be the responsibility of the applicant and/or the HOA. Said plans shall be approved by the City and shall be installed in accordance with the City Standards. 47. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing electric utility company, 48. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing gas utility company. 49. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing telephone utility company. 50. A bond is required guaranteeing the removal of all trailers used during construction. 51. Future signage requires a permit and shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to installation. Prior to Certificate o Occu ancy Issuance 52. Throughout construction, as deemed appropriate by the City and the applicant, fugitive dust suppression along project and perimeter streets and other connecting roads shall be applied to minimize fugitive dust generation. Fugitive dust suppression techniques may include soil watering, application of soil binders, and/or placement of gravel or other appropriate material to minimize vehicle generated dust. ENGINEERING DIVISION 53. The Draft East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 shall incorporate all recommendations stated in the approved traffic study. 54, The cross section of the local roadway shall allow for two I 1-foot drive aisle with 7-foot parking shoulders allowed on each side. 55. All future proposals in the Specific Plan shall require a soils report, hydrology report, traffic study and an Alquist-Priolo study. Additional studies shall be required at the discretion of the Engineering Manager. 56. No imported borrow from outside the Specific Plan area as described in City Ordinance 1105 shall be allowed. 57. In accordance with City Ordinance 1105, as directed by the Flood Plain Administrator (City Engineering Manager), the minimum foundation elevation shall be 1267. No foundation or basement shall be constructed below this elevation unless approved by the Engineering Manager. 58. All grading in the Specific Plan Area shall comply with the Regional Water Quality Control Board Regulation and the Riverside County Permit for the Santa Ana Region. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.6, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-04,AND AMENDED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Continued) 59. All applicants in the Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 area shall be subject to all mitigation, capital improvement and plan check processes, fees and regulations. 60, Those issues, standards, guidelines, etc. not addressed in the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 document and/or the 1993 Specific Plan will revert to the City Municipal Code and/or Zoning Code as of the date established by the 2004 Amended Development Agreement. 61. The applicant shall provide all project-related onsite and offsite improvements as described in the original 1993 East Lake Specific Plan and as superceded by the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 document. 62. All applicants for projects within the East Lake Specific Plan shall be subject to additional Engineering Conditions of Approval in conjunction with future Design Review applications, grading plan approvals, and other required City approvals and entitlements. 63. Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the first structure,the developer or his successor shall have completed construction and received the certificate of occupancy for the entire golf facility, with all components being approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. Said facility shall be privately maintained and open to the public, and may be offered to the City at a future date. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31920 PLANNING DIVISION General Conditions I. Tentative Tract Map No. 31920 will expire two years from the date of approval unless within that period of time a Final Map has been filed with the County Recorder, or an extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and/or Section 12.12 of the 2004 Amended Development Agreement between the City and Laing. Additional extensions of time shall be granted as provided in Section 12.12 of the Development Agreement. 2. Future development shall comply with those standards and guidelines contained in the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 document and conditions of approval established with the original 1993 East Lake Specific Plan and East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6. 3. Tentative Tract Map No. 31920 shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 4. Future development shall comply with those requirements and provisions contained in the 2004 Amended Development Agreement between the City and Laing. All references to the 1994 Amended Development Agreement shall be 2004. 5. The applicant shall provide all project-related onsite and offsite improvements as described in the original 1993 East Lake Specific Plan and as superseded by the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 document. 6. The applicant shall implement appropriate mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Programs for the original 1993 East Lake Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report and the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6. 7. All future proposals shall be reviewed by the City on a project-by-project basis. If determined necessary by the Community Development Director or designee, additional environmental analysis will be required. 8. The applicant shall comply with those conditions of approval required by the Fire Department (see attached). The attached conditions require implementation prior to Final Map recordation, Grading Permit issuance, or Building Permit issuance. Major conditions include: • The applicant shall participate in the Development Impact Fee Program as adopted by the City of Lake Elsinore as of the date established by the Development Agreement. • All water mains and fire hydrants shall be constructed in accordance with Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 and/or No. 787.1. • Prepare a Fuel Modification Plan, subject to approval by the Fire Department. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31920 (Continued) • The Homeowner's Association shall be responsible for implementing the Fuel Modification Plan. • The project shall provide an alternate or secondary access. 9. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, Agents, and its Consultants from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, Consultants or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning implementation and construction of the East Lake Specific Plan, which action is bought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and/or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully with the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, or proceeding, the applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify,or hold harmless the City. 10. Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation and construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and shall cease at 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Construction activity shall not take place on Saturday, Sunday or any Legal Holidays. 11. The applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department. 12. All Conditions of Approval are subject to the terms and limitations of the 2004 Amended Development Agreement between the City of Lake Elsinore and Laing Homes. Prior to Final Tract Map A roval 13. All lots shall comply with applicable standards contained in the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 document and Municipal and Zoning Codes. 14. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots shall be provided per the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 15. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Designee. 16. All of the improvements shall be designed by the applicant's Civil Engineer to the specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31920 (Continued) 17. Prior to approval of the Final Map or if deemed appropriate by the Community Development Director or designee, prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall initiate and complete the formation of a Homeowner's Association, approved by the City, recorded, and in place. All Association documents shall be approved by City Planning and Engineering and the City Attorney and recorded, such as the Articles of Incorporation for the Association; and Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs). At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall include language to ensure the HOA shall maintain landscaping along parkways and project streets, recreational areas, walkways, drainage easements, all right-of-way landscaping, medians, slopes,walls, and focal parks. 18. Prior to Final Map approval,the applicant shall submit a Detailed Phasing, Improvement and Phasing Plan for the entire Tentative Tract Map No. 31920 area, subject to approval by the Community Development Director and Engineering Manager, or designee. Prior to Desi n Review ApRroval 19. Future construction shall meet all Riverside County Fire Department standards for fire protection and any additional requirements requested by the Fire Department. 20. All future stnictural development associated with the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6, including subdivision maps require separate Design Review approval. 21. The applicant (master developer) shall prepare a Community-Wide Wall Plan for the entire East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 and TTM No. 31920 area. Said plan shall show that decorative, masonry, concrete block wails will be constructed around the boundaries of each phased area. 22. The applicant (master developer) shall prepare a signage program which illustrates community theme signage, directional signs, monuments, etc. Prior to Gradin-e Permit,issuance 23. The applicant shall obtain all necessary State and Federal permits, approvals, or other entitlements,where applicable, prior to each phase of development of the project. 24. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit a final grading plan, subject to all requirements of the City Grading Ordinance to the City Engineer for approval. Said grading plan shall address those grading standards and guidelines contained in the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 document. 25. Grading shall not be permitted outside the area of the designated project boundary unless appropriate approvals have been obtained. 26. Grading easements shall be coordinated with affected property owners. 27. Prior to issuance of a grading permit,grading and construction plans shall incorporate erosion control measures. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31920 (Continued) 28. Any alterations to the topography, ground surface, or any other site preparation activity will require appropriate grading permits. A Geologic Soils Report with associated recommendations will be required for grading permit approval, and all grading must meet the City's Grading Ordinance, subject to the approval of the City Engineering Manager and the Planning Division. Interim and permanent erosion control measures are required. The applicant shall bond 100 percent for material and labor for one year for erosion control landscaping at the time the site is rough graded. Prior to Building Permit Issuance 29. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Redevelopment Agency to either provide affordable units in accordance with the provisions of the California Redevelopment Law, appropriate in-lieu-of fees, or a combination of both. 30. The applicant shall annex into Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 to offset the cost of the City maintaining the street lighting. As indicated, the HOA shall maintain all right-of-way landscaping, medians,parkways, slopes and focal parks. 31. The applicant shall annex into Community Facilities District 2003-01 related to the City- Wide Community Facilities District for Public Safety to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City. 32. The applicant shall pay all appropriate traffic impact mitigation fees. 33. The applicant shall pay appropriate TUMF fees or construct the necessary improvements along the 1-15 Freeway at Railroad Canyon Road and acquire approval for any TUMF reimbursement from WRCOG, RCTC,and the City. 34, The applicant shall comply with the following City programs: the City Source Reduction and Recycling Element and Household Hazardous Waste Element, the County Solid Waste Management Plan and Integrated Waste Management Plan. 35. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall submit a letter of verification (will- serve letter)to the City Engineer, for all required utility services. 36. The applicant shall meet all requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). 37. The applicant shall pay applicable fees and obtain proper clearance from the Lake Elsinore Unified School District(LEUSD)prior to issuance of building permits. 38. Pay all applicable fees including park fees. 39. The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer for each lot within any subdivision. No service laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and shall be delineated on engineering sewer plans and profiles for submittal to the EVMWD. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31920 (Continued) 40. Prior to issuance of building permits for each future tract, the applicant or merchant builder for each individual tract shall prepare a Final Wall and Fence Plan addressing the following: • Show that decorative, masonry, concrete block walls will be constructed around each tract. • Show materials, colors,and heights of side yard fences for proposed lots. • Show that all front return walls shall be decorative masonry block walls. Front return wood fences shall not be permitted. • Show that side walls for corner lots shall be decorative masonry block walls. 41. The applicant shall submit plans to the electric utility company for a layout of the street lighting system. The cost of street lighting, installation as well as energy charges shall be the responsibility of the applicant and/or the HOA. Said plans shall be approved by the City and shall be installed in accordance with the City Standards. 42. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing electric utility company. 43. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing gas utility company. 44. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing telephone utility company. 45, A bond is required guaranteeing the removal of all trailers used during construction. 46. Future signage requires a permit and shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to installation. Prior to Certilcate of'Occupancy_Issuance 47, Throughout construction, as deemed appropriate by the City and the applicant, fugitive dust suppression along project and perimeter streets and other connecting roads shall be applied to minimize fugitive dust generation. Fugitive dust suppression techniques may include soil watering, application of soil binders, and/or placement of gravel or other appropriate material to minimize vehicle generated dust. ENGINEERING DIVISION 48. Applicant shall incorporate the recommendations of the traffic study — Southerly (Tentative Tract 31920) Traffic Phasing Analysis City of Lake Elsinore, California, dated February 6, 2004,pages 1-6 through 1-24 (attached)and as modified, added,or deleted as follows: • Applicant shall construct a traffic signal at Diamond Drive and south "C" Street prior to the school opening or issuance of the 50th certificate of occupancy. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31920 (Continued) • Applicant shall NOT construct Railroad Canyon Road at Summerhill Dr -NB right turn lane as described in the traffic study. (This improvement is scheduled for construction 2004/2005. • A bond shall be submitted and maintained for the improvements to Railroad Canyon Road at 1-15 NB ramps until such a time that the pending Caltrans Project Report identifies the specific interchange improvements. Availability for reimbursement for these improvements shall be subject to approval from"COG,RCTC and the City, • Applicant shall construct the traffic signal at Main Street and Lakeshore Drive as indicated in the traffic report. The signal shall be operational prior to issuance of the 250th certificate of occupancy. • Applicant shall construct the traffic signal at Mission Trail and Olive Street as indicated. The signal shall be operational prior to issuance of the 300th certificate of occupancy. • Applicant shall construct the traffic signal at Mission Trail and Lemon Street as indicated in the traffic study. The signal shall be operational prior to issuance of the 300th certificate of occupancy. • Applicant shall install the traffic signal at Bundy Canyon Road/1-15 Freeway ramps. This improvement is not in the City's T1F; fee credit agreements will not apply. The signal shall be operational prior to the issuance of the 501st certificate of occupancy. • Applicant shall install the traffic signal at Mission Trail and Elberta Road as indicated in the traffic study. The signal shall be operational prior to the issuance of the 50th certificate of occupancy. • Applicant shall construct Mission Trail including a raised median as indicated in the traffic study. • Applicant shall construct Malaga Road as indicated in the traffic study. A raised median shall be included with the improvements. • The project Specific flan Amendment Traffic Study does not identify the Diamond Drive alignment improvement from Campbell Street to Lakeshore Drive/Mission Trail as a project offsite mitigation measure, but project T1F funds may be focused on this improvement. • Applicant shall construct the extension of Diamond Drive through the project. The cross section shall conform to the recommendations in the approved traffic study. • Applicant shall provide an alignment study for Bundy Canyon Road from the project's east boundary to Corydon Street as directed and approved by the City Engineering Manager. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31920 (Continued) • Internal streets as shown on Tentative Tract Map 31920 shall comply with the approved roadway cross sections shown in the traffic study document. 49. Per Ordinance 1105 as interpreted by the Flood Plain Administrator,the minimum foundation elevation shall be 1267. No foundation or basement shall be constructed below this elevation unless approved by the City Engineering Manager. 50. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code(LEMC)prior to final map approval. 51. All Capital Improvement, Mitigation and Plan Check fees shall be paid (LEMC 16.34, Resolution 85-26). 52. A"Will Serve"letter shall be submitted to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Letter shall be submitted prior to Final Map Approval. 53. All public works improvements shall be constructed per approved street plans (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). 54. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds prior to final map approval. 55. Pay all fees and meet requirement of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of public works improvements (LEMC 12.08 and Resolution 83- 78). 56. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8-1/2"x I I" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 57. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. 58. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 59. Applicant shall provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. 60. Applicant shall provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans as required by the City Engineering Manager. 61. Applicant shall install blue reflective pavement markers in the street at all fire hydrant locations. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31920 (Continued) 62. Applicant shall submit a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the tract to be approved prior to final map approval. All traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. This includes "No Parking" and"Street Sweeping" signs for streets within the tract. 63. All improvement plans and tract maps shall be digitized. At Certificate of Occupancy applicant shall submit tapes and/or discs which are compatible with City's ARC Info/GIS or applicant to pay$300 per sheet for City digitizing. 64. All utilities except electrical power lines greater than 12KV shall be placed underground, as approved by the serving utility. 65. Applicant shall obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to building permit issuance. A grading plan signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineering Manager. In the event grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted prior to grading. 66. Applicant shall provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 67. An Alquist-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on-site. In the event the project is unaffected by any fault zone, developer shall provide a document certified by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or Licensed Geologist identifying the site as being outside the fault zone. 68. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a Geotechnical Engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. All manufactured slopes greater than 30 feet in height shall be contoured. 69. Individual lot drainage shall be conveyed to a storm drain facility and conveyed to the public storm drain system. Any non-historic storm flows shall not be accepted without a notarized and recorded letter of drainage acceptance from the affected property owner(s) or conveyed to a drainage easement. 70. On-site drainage facilities located outside the road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating: "Drainage casements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions". 71. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineering Manager. 72. Applicant shall submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineering Manager and the Riverside County Flood Control District prior to approval of final map. Applicant shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion caused by development of site and diversion of drainage. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31920 (Continued) 73. All drainage facilities in this tract shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 74. Storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately stenciled to prevent illegal dumping in the drain system,the wording and stencil shall be approved by the City Engineering Manager. 75. Roof and yard drains will not be allowed to outlet through cuts in the street curb. Roof drains should drain to a landscaped area whenever feasible. 76. Ten-year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100-year storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. If either of these criteria is exceeded, additional drainage facilities shall be installed. 77. Applicant shall be subject to all Master Planned Drainage fees as of the date of the 2004 Amended Development Agreement. Staff will review the potential for fee credit for all Master Planned Drainage facilities constructed. 78. Applicant will be required to install BMP's using the best available technology to mitigate urban pollutants from entering the watershed. 79. Applicant shall obtain approval from Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board for their storm water pollution prevention plan including approval of erosion control for the grading plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development and including maintenance responsibilities. 80. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides,pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of stormwater quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside county NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan, 81. Applicant shall provide for first flush BMP's using the best available technology that will reduce storm water pollutants from parking areas and driveway aisles. 82. Intersection site distance shall meet the design criteria of the CALTRANS Design Manual (particular attention should be taken for intersections on the inside of curves). If site distance can be obstructed, a special restricted use easement must be recorded to limit the slope, type of landscaping and wall placement. 83. Applicant shall provide a traffic study prepared by a traffic engineer to determine the traffic volume and the impacts on intersections in the vicinity and freeway on and off ramps prior to final map approval, subject to the approval of the City Engineering Manager. 84. Riverside County Fire Department shall approve width and radii of private streets and the length and configuration of hammerhead turnarounds prior to final map approval. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31920 (Continued) 85. Applicant shall annex into the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 to maintain the storm drain system, including the detention basin and storm drain inlets. 86. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal and recycling, the applicant shall be required to contact with CR&R Inc., for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program For East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 General Plan Amendment Tentative Tract Map 31920 EIR State Clearinghouse #2003071050 ■ Lead Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Community Development Department, Planning Division Prepared by: One City Boulevard West, Suite 900 Orange, CA 92868-3621 Contact: JoAnn Hadfield Revised July 2004 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program overview Introduction This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been developed to ensure that mitigation measures outlined in the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment No. 6 are implemented, as required. The MMRP has been prepared in conformance with Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code. The mitigation measures included in this MN4RP represent specific measures for the Amendment 6 project area. These measures are supplemental to those measures adopted in the previous EIR (1993) and subsequent environmental documents which apply to the entire East Lake Specific Plan (ELSP) property. The previous measures, as discussed in the respective sections of the ELSP Amendment No. 6 SEIR, remain applicable to the project, unless otherwise noted in the SEIR. • Public Resources Code Section 21081.7 requires the lead Agency for each project which is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to monitor performance of the adopted mitigation measures. As lead agency for the project, the City of Lake Elsinore has designed this MMRP to comply with this law and effectively monitor performance of the mitigation measures. Mitigation Matrix In order to effectively track and document the status of mitigation measures, a mitigation matrix including the following components has been prepared: ■ Mitigation Measure No. ■ Mitigation Measure (text) ■ Implementation Action ■ Monitoring Method ■ Responsible Monitoring Party ■ Monitoring Phase a Verification/Approval Party ■ Mitigation Measure Implemented? (Y/N, and date) Documentation Location (Monitoring Record) falEast Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 1 City of Lake•Elsinore Mitigation Monitoring &Reporting Program July 2004 1 Mitigation measure timing of verification has been apportioned into several specific timing increments. Of these, the most common are: 1. Prior to Project Approval (City Council) 2. Prior to Tentative Tract Map (TTM) approval 3. Prior to issuance of grading permit 4. During grading operations 5. Prior to issuance of building permit(s) 6. During construction 7. Prior to issuance of certificate of use and occupancy Mitigation Monitoring Procedures The City of Lake Elsinore Community Development Department is the designated lead agency for the MMRP. The City is responsible for review of all monitoring reports, enforcement actions, and document disposition. The City will rely on information provided by individual _ monitors (e.g. archaeologist, biologists, etc).as accurate and up-to-date and will field check mitigation measure status as required. In-Field Monitoring Project monitors shall exercise caution and professional practices at all times when monitoring construction. Protective wear (hard hats, glasses, etc.) shall be worn at all times in construction areas. Injuries shall be reported immediately to the mitigation monitor. Coordination with Contractors The construction manager/superintendent is responsible for coordination of contractors, and is _ also responsible for contractor completion of required measures in accordance with the provisions of this program. Recognized Experts The use of recognized experts as a component of the monitoring team is required to ensure compliance with scientific and engineering based mitigation measures. While the mitigation monitoring team recognized experts assess compliance with required mitigation measures, consultation with the City of Lake Elsinore planning staff shall take place in the event of a dispute. East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 2 City of Lake Elsinore 1 1J Mitigation Monitoring&Reporting Program July 2004 Arbitration/Dispute Resolution If the mitigation monitor has identified an action which, in the opinion of the monitor, has not been implemented or has not been implemented correctly, the problem will be brought to the attention of the City of Lake Elsinore for resolution. If the problem cannot be satisfactorily resolved by City staff, it will be brought before the Planning Director or designee for resolution. The City will have the authority to issue stop work orders until the dispute is resolved. L Enforcement Agencies may enforce conditions of approval through their existing police power, using stop work orders, fines, infraction citations, loss of entitlements, refusal to issue building permits or certificates of use and occupancy or, in some cases, notice of violation for tax purposes. Criminal misdemeanor sanctions could be available where the agency has adopted an ordinance requiring compliance with the monitoring program, similar to the provision in many zoning ordinances which affirm the enforcement power to bring suit against violators of the ordinances provisions. i Lake Elsinore La East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 3 City o July 2004 Mitigation Monitoring&Reporting Program a� �r c cn o 0 'El u c ao�i Q U Q o � o A >, d y s co nA P. P, G ao A a°i CO R o q ' cz Q o d a. co U U en Al o n ID cli U U ro G a U)w CQ o r U k bn 1-4 a� 5 a CQ ° .�? W y C O ctl FO ti U OlF7 ►•1 t1 G to 0 Cd > o q �D °� ° aqo ;; wwuq p >CA r . Cla o a to d c° U a co En �"i -c7 o a v Q .: p d" epa Rl e cn co cz C cis o `c o ❑ ' o gi 0 o Gy � b Uo N o '�' voi avi U o adi ,,, o ao +� O U N O "•' cC G a) ,.p d ca ,d cq �.:, d �" 0 0 ft � o 0 0 on cn � o •� � d c�a :'' O Q � •� Z Q � O V Q G > o 0 A � V c• y G y v es W W O o o U P 0 a� p" p, .A � •� a�"i ' 'y bOA n OL o Q d q 6Cl y U O co 107 + d U O y bA A O G V+ c) Ca C� p cNd p tl 4- R" Zi F. Cd CO Mco 0 CIS to cdp 4Oy.• '� 't, cad C, N N N �, p •�. N on lyt R m H `v v pco .CA rob b b � � W o o ' an a p U 0 O o Eno ,� o 3 (� q o o M o cu W CD u cts a� 0 cl is o ' p > p 'C o o N W o U U F� c0� U Q Rs b U 3 h Q MO � a ca UWA UGyA U �• d ►w u ap au a Cl A .00 U w a� w .� � � o O � � p U •� � N w00 tp y fd co � � W N C3 y, o .0 � 'y 0 ai O '� G Q y ed y ed N °� a> h p 'D a) '� a> > S"^ ,y P•. C1. �N ,U., Ir v¢i':�' cd 04 U N Oi poi o + o a�i N v`° b i-• .�,,,�••'. eV�,1 .s� o 0j o y P. 0.o G p o o y '� 3 s�4 w •.� .., .� � �• �w G o •y � a� U ca a� U h „G,, 4 'C p id 0� U3 OA vi y 'b O U ai O a lYi N •O G y O p ^4-+ LL y �! G > G O m 'O''' 4w+ p cl o a c� r. .. a W b �' ° o a. ° �d on U G .U' Y N G O eds a, O a G cd 0 `d % Rio w [� •° ^n co 04 �� O.'a � � aUi ° o G U y U m H , ca ' y cd vUi .p G aQ N .41' 1.0 w 'O �+ �d �+ arr. N y N O U G by .� O 6~1 N U 'U00 O + W Cn Fi ca 04 - c°� . u o. c°> cd� * E W P. v, ed -d I rw�< �•. N Q Q e z � a 0 V Q M SC oaf � o c• ° CW ci U c ° w cl � cA m o i � a o m W � � o i.. U O pw Q C 91, _ •i., p � � CO �.O o a 0 M4 o t to d d 0 cli 'G cz v b o o bn d 4i a�i =o ' boa o o ;� o o p W b Cd x � .�, ° b > o 0 0 0 ° a� " Ow p.. iciy-� i � 4w•, a�i y ° Cc ado CA cl ° N ; ro y U Q' O Lps .�' Q En "(7 'd o q c V �' o > O i '' 2 A > ce p a a�i -� m � o m b -° ° � A F i � c '> ^ N efl cvv y > +. > v Ofn ca • ■ a r • r • U� Q `r Ir' cc on > c ww .o q � Q d ❑ � •> Q � .� a�iti A a W o Cd c d ar cL � A I d o ea I w en a�i I o�Dn Q • C o •� a� en•� � q :ti � d p � Q � w W � D I G oD G MtoO _ on �, U O on O H cd [� G •.. ti. bcod O ° Cd cl Cd y � a W z a aC7 c c1, O i� G , o 0-1 U 14 � L Q q � d Ca cli q w °° cd % o .c o ° > > > •o ou t 'in C) a, a, � cd V O J G U Ev U aVi d Z G+ m bn U G R OV COCd q .n+ m o a�i y o o G G o a p G U o 0 0 'b V .14 4.O p A cd O cn N V .a G sz U R. U y cg o q o 00 o .sa cd m O d °J P4 a o o nj � � ° � en G � U • G ca G ' � r � V —od �3 10 d s O �v+ ayyibD aw °i+ 44+ . 42 0 co w V � ey ;z 0 L. G c) 0 — . A � w *n O w � . y " w > a`�i o V V a� cC V �..-1' N 4 . •oA--' y o ° �V.. o� o acdi CL 'G 'v, >, ki GV >�, p p°•' bO N E—� °' a� «. u. R' w caa, yV a) U y o c� y a oO W - • dy V G .r '� ~ p 'L p, v' � •� .� � w q �-+ b �" '� � pp � � '� y..o y �'•�" F, V V b '+-' c� Z O y°� d G y 03,• � o W 0 o . ■ . 0 . ■ Z . aci 3 p, cGa a � U N O � 0 W - a� � t• � y Q Z `� `M'n � �1 z' •� � o -yd 1-4 o � O A U c• y c w I � � q •� ro� Q � � Aq � �w A '� F � r ocd oa a `.. mP� c7P4 ac7 � a4 � v H ... ' rA G C A te" QCO Q Q Q ' rl Q 'cd cc a a.Qcd � co ro coUaM U � Ua � , nu 3 I o o s� ce 'y ncis `a W (00 V] N U P1 P. A" N 03 rd a; d a. •go '"y o t' c°� Qs�� ° two ea w 1-4 al Ca r. y '' .Ly •b p ca N� 1 % 'O O NN Qa O H >✓ �di42 4co IV . C !�• Z o 0-0 LO o cl ro o a ° U A »� .� v Q. o ea '" w 3 ° .fl ' °Cq� w Mr.rn ao ° U � o � � o � p ° o chi co .? U .21 " ' cd p w4 OU ,O O G G A. 0 O m 1. N oN •.• O O 4 O d wi a M i y rocv ao0oneoa 'G� � ea �p ro OD 0 a o� ° � o to!u aoi b b N 'cod cam, c�v �d o U oc, cdI o eu I o o p Q � •m Q � •� U "� a o a U q w w c � o U m aL%io d E E ✓' 1 b On Q ' cl o o it W r tAcz e q '� W 0 � U � I'41 wl w a ' a o cc > a _ 1 Cd (74 cd m" '�"-1. •�"„ N C O � O �+ �+ cd � cd 10, O U H � eCc cd aki ,� o wEI) .n o Z w o a u U o 1.0 o K Q b to a ti W O 1-4 N "" C1 -� N — o w cd a� a, � w O RI -� — ~ •� .d O U U .O Id o U O 14 cd cd tl > Oo 0] J ° O 'd yU + cOd >bo p •, 10,cz °o � '°R '' U a y co d o �� op . � In Q,•� . . 10o ed O v1 cd In O. U "C GA ""' Q CIO 14 O cd434 Ep 3 'in .L'i •--' (/] ^ CA n) c►1 i «f O id '+ cd C� W '3" .0 b a4 U o ono cdod (�f A .° �` •o O a �v v �' �.••/. O L,J rw •a a, > w''�l �0�4 U Q M O 1�-� N V 'L F+. yS�' y � y U to w El) •��111 N �1•d 1-1 '� O u A+ •r'+ aU.• ~ cd •^. ° > w 1-1 •'y N .'''i ° cd -t W U h c c•n rra °' ' � Z a ocvr' q •�'� � Q n � r^ ° Ca oo - z � o 0 o � an i oCn o .5 c o � A � •^ Qa, Q � o c a� CU v > Q w aw � C7 w G tinH opbn o °' o tko o U Qco r ° L q o i� ° a o Q `° El cli _ o as o coi 0 � o a� a x " rd of M cd Q oai G. id 0 co •d 0 0 a� op > o 0 > }^ a a i y ,s� cd > ai wo i o O vi a> won Ell `f �-' U O 'ate O O N O o ' o u o o, -o a o � N v N — } .> L7 on O d 'd a on 3 U o a F Q a�i ar 4 g v o ion o p � °° A cd ro ci Cd ;; G2 co O y y O OEn 04 d a0i 7 O O b C4 i bn p y N O A, E6 G a ¢ ca .o En '" U •On p O O p cOd U N F i . a o dab ° °Ocli ~ O 'w cd 0 y �4 ClEj r7 a+ c� � W d U r/I �. ca i ` I QL) - Z eA M po : 0 a ao aq I eo° 0 0 0 0 A � U Po a� 16. A a� d � z c ca bA 0 00 u O V A Q u Q ■ Q O ocl .o P C7 caob CIS C7 S cCd O�.f O 6 0 .V '.� '•S C bACd N o a o ; p7UZ m s� z o I r-- o � � •o y o v 0 acid � o o0 p an ca o go Q > °M' w a�i °�' � chi aCi p ° cl GO °' f~ z o Z d o a� ° cl ° a ,gyp, R. dD P. .coid ro M O C's v, .o to•� .q .� w >�r=a 4 a� r, o o cd c0 a� 3 v, '° �, � w o °' o �: `� �' sa 3 d o N o a .5 v1 N rn vi o �' U H O p �' > U q n C 3 '� *�" t7 to v p O a U OO ci 4, O O +, �+ 4i :Q cMd U yi Jam'� �" �-' ° NJ .� y OC. 4� p t�C c�Md 0 ^� � 04 Cd bil a > Q� O ° Q� ai �•a y U h '�i cd +� U ° x 1~r fn •ice-+ v, 4•� cz a o „ CZa M m o ca a� b bn o '� cis O aoi o O N 'M C '+��-+ Q ��, `d O C CL 0 'i "d 3 �tl °> ro +•� � •.. °' � � ra °' v o a� p C R. oA > a� ca a� C M i p o chi 0 o ° g; > „ ; o > b �Q 00 w G O O .� cV R O y •d I .�� .� >' w CC43 S o A .M u San' o � o r• U� G y w c ed d Cl 6 6 A = G 0 AU y; id 60. U a y o = &O'd A ` c a cd o � d04. goo a y R'i co ca O t��'a y A. q A O ya O � (.0 � �'tz .0oat° y � wV A � a ° co o >, ocd '� CIS ° O v bA U codo W 'o c v' y C � b° �i o w p+ U R. i � o o P. °` O u �' a ° v Q CI-004