The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRDA Reso No 1989PAGE TWO - RESOLUTION NO. 89-1 the following vote, to wit: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURN, 6JINKLER NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE BOARDM~MBERS: NONE BOARDMEMBERS: NONE ~ 7V~Y ~ ~~,- V ~/ QJ ~~'UW`*. GARY . WASHBURN, CHAIRMAN RED~ LOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE n'~'~ST • _ ~ T ~~ zcxz l~v: ~ xasan CLERK OF E BOP.1~D REDEVELOPMENT AC',ENCY APPROVED AS T FORM & LEGALITY: `~-lVV ~(/li 1 \ JOHN R. HARPER, L GAL COUNSEL REDEVELOPMENT A CY STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) 2, Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, ',__,, n0 HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution duly adopted by the Redevelopment Agency Board of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular Meeting of said Agency on the lOth day of January, 1989, and that it was so adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER, WASHBURN _ NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE - ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE %1 : VICKI LSiN'P E KASAD, CITY CLERK CTTY OF LA E ELSINORE (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. RDA 89-1 of said Agency, and that the same has not been amended or sepealed. DATED: J~3n{zary 12, 1989 ` ~f~ .,,'~'I VICR~NNF SAD, CITY CLERK CrTY OF LA ELSINORE RESOLUTION N0. R.D.A 89-2 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, AND THE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING THE LAKE ELSINORE MANAGEMENT PROJECT. _ WHEREAS, The Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (District) secured a Federal loan and grant under the Sma11 Reclamation Projects act, P.L. 84-984 to finance construction of a main levee, an inlet channel, outlet channel modifications, an outlet pump station, a levee drainage pump station, water supply wells, a park, a campground, and a distribution pump station including piping, to stabilize Lake Elsinore and to provide irrigation, municipal and industrial, flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife benefits, now commonly known as the Lake Elsinore Management Project (The Project); and, WHEREAS, The Project and the City development and redevelopment activities are distinctly separate and unrelated endeavors by different agencies that it is recognized and understood by the City of Lake Elsinore that before any future planning and development of the land that is located in the floodplain can occur, the plans must be processed through the normal 404 process of the Corps of Engineers, and an EIR completed along with approvals of FEMA and other appropriate agencies. WHEREAS, The Project as described in the Loan Application Report approved April 4, 1985, is completely separate and apart from any other projects or activities proposed by oth,er agencies which may or may not include development of properties located with the floodplain area southeast of the proposed levee, or adjacent to, on or near the floodplain area or proposed levee; and, WHEREAS, details of the construction and financing of The Project are outlined in the Loan Application Report which was approved by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation on April 4, 1985; and, -1- WHEREAS, on September 23, 1985, the District entered into a contract with the Bureau of Reclamation entitled, "Contract Between the United States and the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Under the Small Reclamation Projects Act); and, WHEREAS,-as a result~of-common interest-in -The-Project-between .the District, City of Lake Elsinore, Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside, California Department of Parks and Recreation and the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, the Lake Elsinore Management Authority, a joint powers agency, was formed; and, WHEREAS, the purpose of the Lake Elsinore Management Authority is to provide a common ground and establish guidelines within which the member agencies may exercise their common powers to participate in The Project in their respective jurisdictional activities, financially or otherwise, notwithstanding the District's lead agency status regarding The Project. WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore and the Redevelopment Agency of the -- City of Lake Elsinore are undertaking development and redevelopment activities in the vicinity of The Project; and, WHEREAS, the City development and redevelopment activities in the vicinity of The Project are often confused with and incorrectly considered by some as part of The Project. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Lake Elsinore and its Redevelopment Agency, reaffirms its intention to honor its obligations with the Water District, Corps of Engineers, and the Bureau of Reclamation. -2- PASSED, APPROYED AND ADOPTED on this twelfth day of April, 1989, by the Chairman and Executive Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency for the City of Lake Elsinore. ATTEST: ~ ~~~ ~. Ron Molendyk, xecutive Se retary for the Redevelopment Agency -3- RM:Id K16 The Lake Elsinore Management Project April, 1989 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE e , Vice Ch rm APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSID~ ) SS: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) --- I, Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, ~. ~,~ .......,..~ :..~~.~~~ ~ ......v ...... ~,.~...y.,... :y ......,~ ........... ......~s ....,. ~L:;....,.. ,..Y ...... Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting of said Agency on the 14th day of April, 1959, and that it was so adopted by the following vote: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY NONE WASHBURN ABSTAIN: BOARDMEMBERS: lAl~'~w (\~.C'J.L~R~Y ICKI LYN KASAD, CITY CLERK C[TY OF La E ELSINORE (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) WINKLER 1 I, Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. RDA 89-2 of said Agency, and that the same has not been amended or repealed. DATED: April 18, 1989 ~ ~ ~~ VIC~ ~ K~ASAD, CITY CLERK CITY OF E ELST2dORE {SEAL) RESOLUTION N0. R.D.A. 89-2A A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE LAKE ELSINORE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989-1990 AND APPROPRIATING THE FUNDS NECESSARY TO MEET THE EXPENDITURES SET FORTH THEREIN. WHEREAS, that certain document entitled "Budget fiscal Year 1989-1990 LAKE ELSINORE REDEUELOPMENT AGENCY" on file in the office of the Secretary, is hereby approved as the budget for the Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency for the Fiscal Year 1989-1990; and NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency, does hereby find, determine and declare that the budget for the Fiscal Year 1989-1990 is hereby PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of July, 1989, by the following vote: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: BUCK, DOP1INGUEZ, STARKEY, WASHBURPJ, WINKLER NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE ABSENTS: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE ABSTENTIONS: BOARDMFMBERS: NONE REDE E PMENT AGENCY~ CITY LAKE ELSINORE ATTEST: l,-"~ '~, C~~ . CK . KASAD, CLERK OF "`7HE BOARD APPROVED AS TO fORM AND LEGALITY: ~JWf-v JOHN HARPER, L G L COUNSEL 'TAl E :~~ ~ : L= , .~~i€T`i` ~i`:,~" ~ ~ ~~, ~:'p' r.• , t~ ~ : . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.. ., . , ~~:..! _;Y~ne ~a~~d, r~; c.i:,?! ~fi' ~:izF= E,~'cy nr i..a!ce C ~ t~:r€. .1~~ 59's=R~.r i:l{'+'i~~ ,~s'i8~:. i ::..)i`f.,v~i~~:`ip.^vIUL't~k~ C~ll'Y ~,"Y_ti ht/ [.I;c? ':`:~~T:.. ~r.i . i;~'i~y ~ tt. i:i. ~~' Ce ';_t~~.e ~~ ;_ 'e <.' ,av-;.,,, ,:'3~..11'd'; ,~::.ll. ~:.iG~' ?is~ l.~f:~: ~f t5,~ ,~a~ u. ~, ..~..'.ii> 1.3fj.-`%. i i".:~~.t 1t ..:;n: .°~-i: . (Jt ,... Ji IV`3J"i;lll ~;!)7.'~: - av:: ~.~~~~<orvi<<sa~ks "':~:: f;eERS A~i~r fdT: K(?7f'tf ~ 3L~1Bf~:i:5 ,~~ , ~~z~,Rk?t~iEMESE~iS ~ ~~~ 'fIlf~l: LYNNE P.~R~:=.: CIiY CLi?Ri<. CITY OF LAK FL'Si=:;RE .ii,~(';< ~ /~R~, t~ )-~ . c,-;. ~,F ~f~-~r y ~U"!.~''JVL ..j ~1~~~~+1~5~i~~V ~ ~:Ud ~ Il~:..I~~. ~ . ~a~^~~ ^lQ~~ r~~~~t ((~EAL}; STr~:=-`_' Gi- G'kLi~=CRiVTR j ~~i` ~~ UF F3t~Ea5TDE.~ } SSo 'T . ` ~ ~KC•:',[ SiNO~€: ,' 1'.~i@ I~,.Lialdp ~.1 LJ . $FV'a IJp ~i. ~ i ~'y 5 i_<iCt ~ l ~:':~'..; , ,.i(,i .. ~ ~ .... ~Gflilt. ~+~~"12 dh`a4 ~.. ~.i1C;li~~' lS ci il,:~~ '~;}"i1C' #''iii .. . , _' ['. '~>~~Uf"10^ ~V;'. .~f .`;.il( ~ar',`3C/~ ;:"I!~ ~~.}?%i~ i - u ,.._ , !"[~'~ i` '~3? Tf .,t". ~ ' f 2n[FC~i. vt ~ . ., i~ l~ 1 ~i3 .. . . ., _ . ' . Q ~ . , S ~flE "", AL; ':~ ~ ~ ... ~ ~(;I~Y fJF ~~lK~ ~LSI'-:_~?'.~~~ ~_ (;S~{tL} ~ RESOLUTION NO. R.D.A. 89-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, EXPRESSING ITS INTENTION TO ENTER INTO AN EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT WITA THE CITY AND/OR THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WITH ARVIDA CORPORATION RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PROJECT KNOWN AS "THE EAST END DEVELOPMENT PROJECT". WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore (hereinafter "Agency~~) is desirous of commencing a project for the redevelopment of certain property within Redevelopment Project Area III (Rancho Laguna), said property more specifically described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto; and WHEREAS, Agency has solicited requests for proposals for the financing and construction of said East End Development Project (hereinafter "Project"); and WHEREAS, Agency has completed a comprehensive analysis of the proposals received, considered criteria, inoluding the quality of the proposed project, prior projects emphasizing water and recreation interface previously constructed by the applicant, and the demonstrated financial capability to perform the project; and WHEREAS, Agency now desires to indicate its intention to enter into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement and Development Agreement with the applicant selected from among the proposals. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: 1. The foregoing reoitals are true and correct. 2. Agency hereby indicates its intention to enter into an exclusive Negotiating Agreement and Development Agreement with Arvida Corporation for construction of the East End Development Project, as set for in the proposal submitted by Arvida Corporation. PAGE TWO RESOLUTION NO. R.D.A. 89-3 3. Agency hereby directs staff to immediately commence preparation and negotiation with Arvida Corporation of an exclusive negotiating agreement and development agreement for said project. 4. Agency hereby requests that Arvida Corporation signify its desire to proceed with said development project by submitting a letter of acceptance to the Agency and by commencing preparation and neqotiation with staff as set forth herein. ~ .NU V" m~Wlrt~` GARY . WASHBURN, CHAIRMAN RED V LOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ATTEST: RO MOLEN YK, SEC ETARY OF THE BOARD REDEVELOP ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ~~, % ~ JOHN HARPER, ENCY COUNSEL PASSED, APPROVED AND ADO following vote: AYES: BOARDMEP1BERS: NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDP1EP~BERS: ABSTAIN: BOARDMEMBERS: ~TED on this 25th day of July, 1989 upon the BUCK, DOP4INGUEZ, STARKEY, 6JINKLER, WASHBURN NONE NONE PJONE . ~ .T _ ~/ ~ ~ ~ ~ RIYEN&DE DI11VE - _ i~ ,~~._ - - . _ C . .,~, ;~. _ ;~ . ~ ,~r ~ ,'. , , ~ ~ .1 ~ ~ •;, i` ti ; ~y :~\ ~Z ~~ ~ ;t~ t~ ~ ;< i 1 ~ . 1't ~l ~r;~i a~ +1~ ~ i ~ ~~ i~c r` , c.li ~ ~ \ . ~_ 1 ~ i. 4 ~ ~(~^P '~ ~ ~ 1 ~ . ~ 71y ~.t~ 4 1 t . ' ti' > s ~`~; r~~~'~y ~~a`"~ ° ~' ~ I ~ / a Y'i~ A~nyn~~ • ~~~ ' ~ J ~ ~ r"' J eyr`!'~y~'~'ri~f9~ 'j ~ rj c 'Pwt¢~ n~~~~~i A ,..-y~ ` i . ~ ~ ~ ~~ . ~ f r rf~x y~~~; ~;~y,1t~ ~ t t . , ~ .~'~ x ,} ~t ~ a ~ t~ n~w~vf ~~ • s ~ i' ~ i > ... ~' ~ ~f ~~ P~, } .'t~ ~''S ~r.~ tt.ik~'~t.i- f3 ~ ~~ . [ . 1~ i x y7V~ 4~ 7 r- ;~i~'~" .~ r j ~ ~y./ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `"'~' ~ .~ ~ ~tt~ ~if~?~,£' :t At i?'~ , ~a..tii A 1~ ~ r . ~ ~a ~aY ~:9io ~j ~ ~ ' Ir -,,,~ e 1, R y+,4 ~~ a`I Y~ W~ ~:'`' M ~~eY j'iF ( ~ 5 Y ~l i~~.~ o~* /l7 i' j "+ Y t a: r e r > e r.y~r'~4~~y1r~~~" rt~ rr~ v i . 1 ~ y, vi4r ~'1 ~. ~ ~~.l1, "kl{)J~r~.y, ~ k'+ i Nn {~ I~ . r t~t~~ ~T~~~f}Irrt. ~ ~^ A~C`k~ , l~~ ; ;i K ~i', .~h~it~ `~MP~~~'~1~.~~~1~ ~~~;`! ~.~~~ ~~< . t r.. ~.:,r 1 Ku.1 ~~ j~ G i + !N* ~~h~ `!~ 1Vl},ey~~ ^~h ]~ ~! . ' ~ " ~ (1 ~~i ~ a "~J~Gr ~ l yN +.~'. sC .t1 . I ~ . f,Mr \ >t ' ~ w i . I ~ ~ ~L ^ ~ ~y`-t . .~h i ~r ~ ~~~~Y^^^y^`fvii,~ ~ ~1 .rr~i . 1 S i. Jli ~1' ty ni( r` ~. L "~"'~ "}L~ ~ ~~~+ia'~~.~kt~'~~~r s~...ti~~-l ~~t. ~ v Z i ~ ~"w~ii{iir".1;r-rya 4.M ~ ~l4 \ ~ j~"~ ~ti°~ ti°t 't ly~t ~k+.4~,'-~r_ ' L~. ~ ~r ~d,F`r~,r~ ,~oKf`"Y-r.~:~;~ >~ !. ,~ ~t : ~~ "2 i;~`uiw'-~,4 ~.F;i~ ~af~'~~I~~~c'1~`~f° t' 4'~''.k'~'±j> ' 1 ~ ~..7 Y ~~yf' e, f y 3~i;s ~{.r ~ M1~c~a`a.4q, {F ¢~f eSi + ~~ C.~(~M1 L+1d.' ~ \t~ 4 4 . ~ {M1~yv~] ~Ii°7 !C*~ `~ ri7~ e l~fk ?~~ !"~ ~.~~~'~YPS~F *~ .. ~ ' ~. ~A~. 4~ ~~. ',ei {~~i"j~~~ ! '~? 4 -~~ ,r, , ~ ~L~a ~ . ~ Y~`i' { S i r t~'~~1~~~' 3 ' ~~ e~o x + s ~iy 1 ~' ~ ~f~f * ~~ r '1 , ~~.j{.~'i jY ~ ~ I~ .~ i +. ~.. i 'iY . ~.., A ~ '<"^ ~ ~ i ~ ~c ~`) A ~~ „ F ; '',r?. + ~ ~ ,'61, ne! x '§`~'~ ~~`' r ~ . ~ , 4r~ 6 L ~, ~ i._ ~ ;,` / ~`.o I ~ 1~~,~ ~, p \,, ~'e 1 r ?U F ~ .. ~~~ . `~ ~ f, ' 'p~f a~d4 ~A'. ~y,,, . ,' .' , . ~' s ,~r~ ~. ,,.~rF'""~. .` ..~ , ~~ ;';^~ "~r%~'>t"~h~, ~~~~~~i'r;` ~ .; ,,,,~1 , ~ :r ~"6'fE~dh 4^ ~~ w i. n7 .~ , . ~~ZJm+a' ~ ~l'L-+~....'.~r~. r ~i.t,'_~I` ~ , ` . _ ~ t ~ `*~i; ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~` ^. ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ,j ~ ~ ~ . • ~ ~ ~ l' t \~ '~~ ti' 4.. y ~. if.. Q~,,,-.l' ~ . `,`~ ~ 1 : ' ~` ~. ~`,~ ~~ ~ ~ c ,,~.~ ` ~r ~~ , ~.3( ~~ 1 '"'~ G' _ ~" ~. ` • ° ~ ~ x ti ` l• a - ~`~ ,1~~~!h- `t '~"' S ~ 'k~ . ~:, i ~..t. ~ : ~ .~ - _ ~ ,. , Y ~ , •I+~,~ ~ ~ ` ti ~ ` ° j' f" ~ ~ ~~a~ ~~~' „~'~ ~ ; ~ j '~' -~L. ~;~~~~ ~. . l~' I `e ~~ ;-'~r '~~~~' ~:~ : ..~ ~ ,.;., ,,: , Y 1 ~.+~'I• `,``~f .~~1aj \~ ~' \~' ..' ~ ~ A f~.. . • p~ ~ ''_1 '~ ...j.~ \ ; ,~ . . !F - "`>. _, _~ ~~ \ , `je ~- ._ ~~ ~ . . ,~...; , `~~ . ' ~< ~ g '. ~ . - '' ~.: s~ ~ ~ ; .~. . ~, '41 _ I r-- ~:;> ~ ~ t ~ ~~ ~r., R • ~ ' ^ ,,,~ D D ~{ •~ ~/70\ 1 ~ 1 ~ • `~ ~f ~ p ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ / ~ ~ n ~,. ,1 > ~ . ` „ ~o°e ~ `•^_ . 7 ~ ~, V n~ y ~~ 1 ~ O . 1 ~ ~V~'~ M ~ ~ ~ ; ` ~ J.~ 1r1~ ~ ~Y9 ~ i ~ ~ ~ . r i ;- -I + #' ' ~ /~ ~~.,~ , : ' w ~. ~ ~ 1~1 . \ 1 lbc:: ' ^ ~~ . . . ~ ~~1~~ ~ o p C ~ l ~ ~ • ~ ~ ' • a y ~ i~ a 'A ~ ~ f • .(r_t'~,, .w- V• . o ~ --~_. -_o~'l~ ~~ ~ ~ e ~ w Fa~~'a; Y 1 ~ D j[ i . ' ' ~`~Ul~' ~ ~ . .. . ~ . / STATE Of CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution duly adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting of said Agency on the 25th day of July, 1989, and that it was so adopted by the following vote: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY WASHBURN, WINKLER NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE kBSTAIN: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE J`~.~ ~;~".ca~"x'~ VICKI LYNNE ASAD, CITY CLERK CITY Of LAK: ELSINORE (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIIIERSIDE ) SS: CITY Of LAKE ELSINORE ) I, Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. RDA 89-3 of said Agency, and that the same has not been amended or repealed. DATED: July 26, 1989 ~~~, VICK-I LYNN KASAD,~CLERK CITY OF LA EISINORE (SEAL) RESOLUTION N0. RDA 89-4 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEUELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AUTHORIZING FORMATION OF A JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY WITH THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore (the "City") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore (the "Agency") are each authorized to own, lease, purchase, receive and hold property necessary or convenient for their governmental operations; and WHEREAS, the financing of the acquisition of property by the City and the Agency acting separately may result in - duplication of effort, inefficiencies in administration, and excessive cost, all of which, in the judgment of the City and the Agency, could be eliminated if the financing of the acquisition of property were capable of being performed through a single public agency; and WHEREAS, in furtherance thereof, the City and the Agency propose to form a joint exercise of powers authority pursuant to Article 1(commencing with section 6500) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the California Government Code to exercise the common powers of the Agency and the City; and WHEREAS, the form of joint exercise of powers agreement _ betWeen the Agency and the City creating the Lake Elsinore Public Financing Authority (the "Joint Powers Agreement"), has been filed with the Agency, and the members of the Agency, with the aid of its staff, have reviewed the Joint Powers Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL~ED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore as follows: Section 1. Formation of Joint Powers Authority. The Agency hereby authorizes the officers and staff inembers of the Agency to assist in the organization of a joint exercise of powers authority between the City and the Agency, to be known as the "Lake Elsinore Public Financing Authority." The City Council hereby approved the form of, and authorizes the Chairman, the Treasurer or the Executive Director to execute and the Secretary to attest the Joint Powers Agreement forming said joint exercise PAGE TWO - RESOLUTION N0. RDA 89-4 of powers authority, in substantially the form on file with the Secretary together with any changes therein deemed advisable by the counsel to the Agency. Section 2. Official Actions. The Chairman, the Treasurer, the Executive Director and the Secretary of the Agency, are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things necessary or desirable hereunder with respect to the formation of said joint exercise of powers authority, including but not limited to the execution and delivery of any and all agreements, certificates, instruments and other documents, which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or desirable and~not inconsistent with the purposes of this resolution. Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of August , 1989, by the following vote: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: BUCK, DOP1INGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER, WASHBURN NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE ATTEST: RON MOLENDYK, SECRETARY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution duly adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting of said Agency on the 8th day of August, 1989, and that it was so adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, WINKLER, WASHBURN NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ~~ r^~ V Cr KI LY~ ` KASAD, CITY CLERK CITY OF LA E ELSIZ30RE (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. RDA 89-4 of said Council, and that the same has not been amended or repealed. D TFD: fiugust 9, 1989 ~ ~ (^ n~ VICKI LYN~ KASAD, CITY CLERK CITY OF LA ELSINORE (SEAL) RESOLUTION NO. RDA 89-5 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TAE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE~ CALIFORNIA~ AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF $3,500,000 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF RANCHO LAGUNA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA N0. III TAXABLE BOND ANTICIPATION NOTES, 1989 SERIES, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION OF INDENTURE OF TRUST RELATING THERETO, AUTHORIZING SALE OF SUCH NOTES, APPROVING OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND PROVIDING ^vTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the Agency is authorized pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law, being part 1 of Division 24 (commencing with Section 33000) of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California (the "Law") and pursuant to the provisions oP Chapter 6 of Division 6 of Title 1(commencing with Section 59000) of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Taxable Law") to issue its taxable bond anticipation notes for the purpose of financing redevelopment activities within and of benefit to its redevelopment project areas; and WHEREAS, after due investigation and deliberation, the Agency has determined that it is in the interests of the Agency at this time to provide for the issuance of its Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore Rancho Laguna Redevelopment Project Area No. III Taxable Bond ,_ Anticipation Notes, 1989 Series (the "Notes"), for the purpose of financing redevelopment activities within and of bene£it to the Agency's Rancho Laguna Redevelopment Project Area No. III; and WHEREAS, the Notes are proposed to be issued pursuant to an Indenture of Trust (the "Indenture") dated as of September 15, 1989, by and between the Agency and the Bank of New York Trust Company of California, as trustee; and WHEREAS, as authorized by the Taxable law, the"Agency hereby determines that the interest payable on the notes will be subject to federal income taxation under law in existence on the date of issuance of the Notes; and PAGE TWO WHEREAS, the Taxable law authorizes the Notes to be sold at private sale and the Agency proposes to sell the Notes at private sale to First California Capital Markets Group (the "Underwriter"), all on the terms and conditions herein set forth and as provided in the form of Purchase Contract (the "Purchase Contract") on file with the Secretary, and WHEREAS, the Underwriter has caused to be prepared an O£ficial Statement describing the Notes, the preliminary form of which is on file with the Secretary; and WHEREAS, the Agency with the aid of its staff has reviewed the Indenture, the Purchase Contract and the Of£icial Statement; and the Agency wishes at this time to approve the foregoing in the public interests of the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by Redevelopment Aqency of the City of Lake Elsinore, as follows: SECTION 1. Issuance of Notes; Approval of Indenture. The Agency hereby authorizes the issuance of the Notes under and pursuant to the Law, the Taxable Law and the Indenture, in the aggregate principal amount of $3,500,000. The Agency hereby approves the Indenture in substantially the form thereof on file with the Secretary together with any additions thereto or changes therein deemed necessary or advisable by the Executive Director, including, without limitation, the addition to the Indenture o£ the final interest rate payable with respect to the Notes as contained in the Purchase Contract hereinafter approved, and execution of the Indenture shall be deemed conclusive evidence of the Agency~s approval of such additions or changes. The Executive Director and Secretary of the Aqency are hereby authorized and directed to '____: execute, attest and affix the seal of the Agency to the Indenture for and in the name and on behalP of the Agency. The Agency hereby authorizes the delivery and performance of the Indenture. PAGE THREE SECTION 2. Sale of Notes. The Agency hereby authorizes the sale of the notes to the Underwriter pursuant to and in accordance with the Purchase Contract in substantially tha form on file with the Secretary together with any additions thereto or changes therein approved by either the Executive Director or the Treasurer of the Agency (or the written designee of either), whose execution thereof shall be conclusive evidence of such approval. The Agency hereby delegates to both the Executive Director and the Treasurer (and to the written designee of either) the authority to accept an offer from the Underwriter to purchase the Notes from the Authority and to execute the Purchase Contract for and in th~ name and on behalf of the Agency; provided, however, that the stated interest rate payable with respect to the Notes shall not exceed eleven percent (11%) per annum and the purchase price paid by the Underwriter for the purchase of Notes shall be not less than ninety-eight percent (98%) of the par amount thereof, excluding any original issue discount on the Notes. SECTION 3. Of£icial Statement. The Agency hereby approves them Preliminary Official describing the Notes, in substantially the form on file with the Secretary, together with any changes therein or additions thereto necessary or convenient to cause the preliminary Official Statement to describe accurately matters pertaining to the Notes. The Underwriter is hereby authorized to distribute the preliminary Official Statement in connection with the marketing of the Notes. The Chairman (or his written designee) is hereby authorized and directed to approve any changes in or additions to the final form of such Official Statement as the Chairman (or his written designee) shall deem advisable to . cause the final OPficial Statement to describe accurately the Notes and matters contained in the Purchase Contract, the PAGE FOUR Inden~ure and the related proceedings and actions, and to execute (or to cause to be so executed by his written designee) said final Official Statement for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency. SECTION 4. Official Action. All actions theretofore taken by the officers and agents of the Agency with respect to the issuance of the Notes are hereby approued, confirmed and ratified. The Chairman, the Executive Director, the Secretary/Treasurer, the Finance Officer, the General Counsel of the Agency and any and all other officers of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to do any and all things and take any and all actions, including execution and delivery of any and all assignments, certificates, requisitions, agreements (including but not limited to an agreement for investment of the proceeds of the Notes), notices, consents, instruments of conveyance, warrants and other documents, which they, or any of them, may deed necessary or advisable in order to consummate the sale, issuance and delivery of the notes to the Underwriter pursuant to the documents approved herein. __ SECTION 5. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect from and after the date of approval and adoption thereof. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 12 day o£ September, 1989, by the following vote: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, ~TP.P.KEY, k!P:SHBUP,P! NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: NOhE ABSTENTIONS: BOARDMEMBERS: G!I~IKLER ~ l- UVG~ °WU'~-~ GARY . WASHBURN, CHAIRMAN REDE LOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE PAGE FIVE ATTEST: ~ ~ VICK . K~SAD, CLE K OF THE BOARD APPROV]Ell AS TO FORM ANn T~F.CAT~TT}(; STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) (~ I, Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, - DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution duly adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore at a reqular meeting of said Agency on the 12th day of September, 1989, and that it was so adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY WASHBURN NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE A.BSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: WINKLER ~ VICKI ISY'.R'I~I KASA , CITY LERK CITY OF LA E ELSINORE __. (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) 2, Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. RDA 89-5 of said Agency, and that the same has not been amended or repealed. D TEI~~ ~1e~,texnber 13, 1989 - , ~~ ~ VICKI .L11VNE SX~D, CITY L RK - CITY UF LAK ELSINORE ,. ~_.-_ (SEAL) 'r; ~: .~ _. .,..~; _ .. _.., _ , , , w r,, .~, ,. , RESOLUTION NO. RDA 8~-6 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING POLICY RELATING TO SEISMIC HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND REDUCTION PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the State of California Legislature in 1986 adopted SB-547 requiring all jurisdictions in Seismic Zone Four to inventory all buildings with unreinforced masonry walls and develop a hazard mitigation program; and WHEREAS, it is the Council°s intent in adopting the policy contained herein to identify and promote public safety by reducing the risk of death or injury that may result from the effects of earthquakes on buildings that have been identified as potentially hazardous. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council o£ the City of Lake Elsinore, California, does hereby establish the policy relating to seismic hazard identification and reduction program, as follows: POLICY The provisions of these sections are minimum standards for structural seismic resistance established primarily to reduce the risk of loss of life or injury and will not necessarily prevent loss of life or injury or prevent earthquake damage to an exist- ing building which complies with these sections. 1.0 SCOPE OF PROGRAM A. Scope. Building defined as "potentially hazardous" may have the hazard mitigated by strengthening or removal. Exception: Residential structures containing five (5) or less dwelling units. 2.0 BUILDING CATEGORIES AND IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE A. Buildinq Cateaories. The categories of buildings within the scope of this policy are set forth in the building survey attached. B. Owner Notification. The owners of buildings listed on the building survey shall be notified by the Building and Safety Department that they own a potentially hazardous 1 structure. They 'also will be informed that the Building Department can provide information and standards regarding retrofit of these buildings. C. Implementation. The owners of building must submit engineering reports, plans for correction and mitigate the hazard only when structural alterations are done to the building. Documentation acceptable to the Building Official shall be submitted relative to exempt buildings. The Building Official may require additional tests, inspections or reports to substantiate the exemption. 3.0 DEFINITIONS A. "Bearina wall" means any wall supporting a floor or roof where the total superimposed load exceeds one hundred (100) pounds per linear foot, or any unreinforced masonry wall over six (6) feet in height supporting its own weight. B. "Buildina", for the purpose of determininq occupant load, means any contiguous or interconnected structure; for purposes of engineering evaluation, means the entire structure or a portion thereof which will respond to seismic forces as a unit. C. "Civil enqineer or structural enaineer" means a licensed civil or structural engineer registered by the State of California pursuant to the rules and regulations of Title 16, Chapter 5 of the California Administrative Codea D. "Occupants" means the total occupant load of a building determined by Table 33-A of the current edition of the Uniform Building Code. E. "Unreinforced Masonrv (URM)" building means any building containing walls constructed wholly or partially with any of the following materials: 1. Unreinforced brick masonry 2. Unreinforced concrete masonry 3. Hollow clay tile 4. Adobe or unburned clay masonry 4.0 STRENGTHENING. Strengthening of unreinforced masonry bearing wall building. 4.1 SCOPE. The requirements of this section shall apply to all building or all unreinforced masonry bearing wall structures. Excebtion: This section shall not apply to residential structures containing five (5) or less dwelling units. ` ' 4.2 ALTERNATE MATERIALS. Alternate materials, designs and methods of construction may _._~ be approved by the Building Official in accordance with this code. 4.3 DEFINITIONS A. "Cross Walls" are interior walls of masonry or wood frame construction with surface finish of wood lath and plaster 2 or minimum 1/2" gypsum wall board. Such walls shall be full story height with a minimum length of 1 1/2 times the story height. Cross walls shall be spaced less than 40 feet apart in each story. B. "Essential Facilities" are those structures or buildings housing an occupancy or use classified as essential facilities under the earthquake regulations of the Building Code. C. "Unreinforced Masonrv Bearina Wall": A masonry wall having all of the following characteristics: 1. Provides the vertical support for a floor or roof. 2. The total superimposed load is over 100 pounds per linear foot. 3. The area of reinforcing steel is less than 50 percent of that required by the Building Code. 4.4 AISTORIC BUILDINGS A. General. A historic building or structure may comply with the special provisions set forth in this section and the State Historic Building Code. B. Unburned C1av Masonrv or Adobe. Existing or re-erected walls of adobe construction shall conform to the following: 1. Unreinforced adobe masonry walls shall not exceed a height or length to thickness ratio of 5, for exterior bearing walls and must be provided with a reinforced bond beam at the top, interconnecting all walls. Minimum beam depth shall be 6 inches and a minimum width of 8 inches less than the wall width. Minimum wall thickness shall be 18 inches for exterior bearing walls and 10 inches for adobe partitions. No adobe structure shall exceed one story in height unless the historic evidence indicates a two story height. In such cases the height to thickness ratio shall be the same as above for the first floor based on the total two story height and the second floor wall thickness shall not exceed the ratio 5 by more than 20 percent. Bond beams shall be provided at the roof and second floor levels. 2. Foundation footings shall be reinforced concrete under newly reconstructed walls and shall be 50 percent wider than the wall above, soil conditions permitting, except that the foundation wall may be 4 inches less in width than the wall if a rock, burned brick, or stabilized adobe facing is necessary to provide authenticity. 3. New or existing unstabilized brick and adobe brick masonry shall test to 75 percent of the compressive strength required by the Building Code for new material. Unstabilized brick may be used where existing bricks are unstabilized and and where the building is not susceptible to flooding conditions or direct exposure. Adobe may be allowed a maximum value of 3 pounds per square inch for shear with no increase for lateral forces. 4. Mortar may be of the same soil composition and 3 stabilization as the brick in lieu of cement mortar. 5. Nominal tension stresses due to seismic forces normal to the wall may be neglected if the wall meets thicknesses requirements and shear values allowed by this subsection. C. Archaic Materials. Allowable stresses for archaic materials not specified in this code shall be based on substantiating research data or engineering judgment with the approval of the Building Official. 4.5 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN A. General. Every structure within the scope of this section shall be analyzed and constructed to resist minimum total lateral seismic forces assumed to act nonconcurrently in the direction of each of the main axes of the structure in accordance with the the following equation: V+IKCSW (A1-1) The value of KCS need not exceed the values set forth in Table A1-A based on the seismic zone as determined by the Building Code. The I factor shall be as specified in Table A1-B. The value of W shall be as set forth in the Building Code. B. Lateral Forces on Elements of Structures. Parts or --- portions of buildings and structures shall by analyzed and designed for lateral loads in accordance with Section 23 of the Building Code but not less that the value for ~ the following equation: Fp= ICpsWp (A1-2) For the provisions of this section, the product of IS need not exceed the values as set forth in Table A1-C, The value of Cp and Wp shall be as set forth in the Building Code. Exception: Unreinforced masonry walls in buildings not required to be designed as an essential building may be designed in accordance with Section 4.6. C. Anchoraae and Interconnection. Anchorage and interconnection of all parts, portions and elements of the structure shall be analyzed and designed for lateral forces in accordance with Section 23 of this Code and the equation Fp=ICp SWp as modified by Table No. A1-C. Minimum anchorage of masonry walls to each floor or roof shall resist a minimum force of 200 pounds per linear foot acting normal to the wall at the level of the floor or roof. D. Level of Reauired Repair. Alterations and repairs _. required to meet the provisions of this resolution shall comply with all other applicable requirements of the Building Code unless specifically provided for in this section. E. Required Analysis. 1. General. Except as modified herein, the analysis and 4 design relating to the existing structures with shall be in accordance with Chapter 23 of the Building 2. 3. structural alteration of the scope of this section he analysis specified in Code. Continuous Stress Path. A complete, continuous stress path from every part or portion of the structure to the ground shall be provided for the required horizontal forces. Positive Connections. All parts, portions or ele- ments of the structure shall be interconnected by positive means. F. Analvsis Procedure 1. General. Stresses in materials and existing construction utilized to transfer seismic forces from the ground to parts or portions of the structure shall conform to those permitted by the Code and those materials and types of construction specified in Section 4.6. 2. Connections. Materials and connectors used for interconnection of parts and portions of the structure shall conform to the Building Code. Nails may be used as a part of an approved connector. 3. Unreinforced Masonrv Walls. Unreinforced masonry walls shall be analyzed as specified in the Building Code to withstand all vertical loads as specified in Chapter 23 of the Building Code in addition to the seismic forces required by this section. Such walls shall meet the minimum requirements set forth in the Building Code. The 50 percent increase in the seismic force factor for shear walls as specified in Table 24-H of the Building Code may be omitted in the computation of seismic loads to existing shear walls. No allowable tension stress will be permitted in unreinforced masonry walls. Walls not capable of resisting the required design forces specified in this section shall be strengthened or shall be removed and replaced. Exceptions• a. Unreinforced masonry walls in buildings not classified as an essential building may be analyzed in accordance with Section 5.7. b. Unreinforced masonry walls which carry no design loads other than its own weight may be considered as veneer if they are adequately anchored to new supporting elements. G. Combination of Vertical and Seismic Forces L New Materials. All new materials introduced into the structure to meet the requirements of this Section which are subjected to combined vertical and horizontal forces shall comply with Chapter 23 of the Building Code. 2. Existina Materials. When stress in existing lateral force resisting elements are due to a combination of dead loads plus live loads plus seismic loads, the 5 allowable working stress specified in the Building Code may be increased 100 percent. However;, no increase will be permitted in the stresses allowed in Section 4.6. The stresses in member due only to seismic and dead loads shall not exceed the values permitted by Chapter 23 of the Building code. 3. Allowable Reduction of Bendina Stress bv Vertical __ Load. In calculating tensile fiber stress, stresses may be reduced by the full direct stress due to vertical dead loads. 4.6 MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION A. General. All materials permitted by this Code including their appropriate allowable stresses and those existing configurations of materials specified herein may be utilized to meet the requirements of this section. B. Existing Materials. 1. Unreinforced Masonrv Walls. Unreinforced masonry walls analyzed in accordance with this section may provide vertical support for roof and floor construction and resistance to lateral loads. The bonding of such walls shall be as specified in the Building Code. Tension stresses due to seismic forces normal to the wall may be neglected if the walls do not exceed the height or length to thickness ratio set forth in Table Al-D and the in-plane shear stresses due to seismic loads as set forth in Table No. A1-G. If the wall height-thickness ratio exceeds the specified limits, the wall may be supported by vertical bracing members designed by the requirements of Chapter 23 of the Building Code. The deflection of such bracing member at design loads shall not exceed one-tenth of the wall thickness. Exception: The wall may be supported by flexible vertical bracing members designed in accordance with this section if the deflection at design loads is not less than one-quarter nor more than one-third of the wall thickness. All vertical bracing members shall be attached to floor and roof construction for their design loads independently of required wall anchors. Horizontal spacing of vertical bracing member shall not exceed one-half the unsupported heiqht of the wall or ten feet. 2. Special Provisions for Hollow Clav Tile Wall Buildinas. Bearing walls of hollow clay tile may be used to resist lateral forces under the following conditions: ___. a. Walls shall meet the height to thickness ratio required for masonry walls as set forth in Table A1-D. b. Where hollow clay tile walls are constructed of more than one wythe the wythes shall be stitched together with anchors not exceeding 24 inches on center in each direction. 6 c. The allowable shear stress in hollow clay tile walls shall not exceed 3 psi unless justified by tests as specified for brick masonry walls. 3. Special Provisions for Unreinforced Concrete Block Masonrv Walls. Bearing walls o£ unreinforced concrete block may be used to resist lateral forces under the following conditions: a. Walls shall meet the height to thickness ratio required in Table A1-D. b. The allowable shear stress in unreinforced con- crete block walls shall not exceed 5 psi unless justified by tests as required in Section d. below and Table No. A1-E. 4. Existina Roof, Floors, Walls, Footings, and Wood Framina. Existing materials including wood shear walls utilized in the described configuration may be used as part of the lateral load resisting system, provided that the stresses in these materials do no exceed the values shown in Table No. A1-E. C. Strenathenina of Existina Materials. New materials including wood shear walls may be utilized to strengthen portions of the existing seismic resisting system in the described configurations provided that the stresses do not exceed the values shown in Table A1-F. D. Minimum Acceptable Ouality of Existina Unreinforced Masonrv Walls. 1. General Provisions. All unreinforced masonry walls utilized to carry vertical loads and seismic forces parallel and perpendicular to the wall plane shall be tested as specified'in this Section. All masonry quality shall equal or exceed the minimum standards established herein or shall be removed and replaced by the Building Official. The quality of mortar in all masonry walls shall be determined by performing in-place shear tests or by testing eight inch diameter cores. Alternative methods of testing may be approved by the Building Official. Nothing shall prevent pointing with mortar of all the masonry wall joints before the tests are first made. Prior to any pointing, the mortar joints must be raked and cleaned to remove loose and deteriorated mortar. Mortar for pointing shall be type S or N except masonry cements shall not be used. All preparation and mortar pointing shall be done under the continuous inspection of a Special Inspector. At the conclusion of the inspection, the inspector shall submit a written report to the person responsible for the seismic analysis of the building setting forth the result of the work inspected. Such report shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval as part of the structural analysis. All testing shall be performed in accordance with the requirements specified in this Section by a testing agency. An accurate record of all such tests and their location in the building shall be recorded and these results shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval as part of the structural analysis. 2. Number and Location of Tests. The minimum number of 7 tests shall be two per wall or line of wall elements resisting a common force, or 1 per 1500 square feet of wall surface, with a minimum of eight tests in any case. The exact test or core location shall be determined at the building site by the person responsible for the seismic analysis of the subject building. 3. In-Place Shear Tests. The bed joints of the outer wythe of the masonry shall be tested in shear by laterally displacing a single brick relative to the adjacent bricks in that wythe. The opposite head joint of the brick to be tested shall be removed and cleaned prior to testing. The minimum quality mortar in 80 percent of the shear tests shall not be less than the total of 30 psi plus the axial stress in the wall at the point of the test. The shear stress shall be based on the gross area of both bed joints and shall be that at which movement of the brick is first observed. 4. Core Tests. A minimum number of mortar test specimens equal to the number of required cores shall be prepared from the cores and tested as specified herein. The mortar joint of the outer wythe of the masonry core shall be tested in shear by placing the circular core section in a compression testing machine with the mortar bed joint rotated 15 degrees from the axis of the applied load. The mortar joint tested in shear shall have an average ultimate stress based of 20 psi based on the gross area. The average shall be obtained from the total number of cores made. If - test specimens cannot be made from cores taken then the shear value shall be reported as zero. E. Testina of Shear Bolts. One-fourth of all new shear bolts and dowels embedded in unreinforced masonry walls shall be tested by a Special Inspector using a torque calibrated wrench to the following minimum torques: 1/2" diameter bolts or dowels = 40 foot-lbs 5/8" diameter bolts or dowels = 50 foot-lbs 3/4" diameter bolts or dowels = 60 foot-lbs No bolts exceeding 3/4" shall be used. All nuts shall be installed over malleable iron or plate washers when bearing on wood and heavy cut washers when bearing on steel. F. Determination of Allowable Stresses for Desian Methods Based on Test Results. 1. Desian Shear Values. Design seismic in-plane shear stresses shall be substantiated by tests performed as specified in Items 3 and 4 above. Design stresses shall be related to test results obtained in accordance with Table A1-G. Intermediate values between 3 and l0 psi may be _._ interpolated. 2. Desian Compression and Tension Values. Compression stresses for unreinforced masonry having a minimum design shear value of 3 psi shall not exceed 100 psi. Design tension values for unreinforced masonry shall not be permitted. 8 G. Five percent of the existing rod anchors utilized as all or part of the required wall anchors shall be tested in pullout by a testing laboratory approved by the Building Official. The minimum number tested shall be four per floor with two tests at walls with joists parallel to the wall. The test apparatus shall be supported on the masonry wall at a minimum distance of the wall thickness from the anchor tested. The rod anchor shall be given a preload of 300 lbs prior to established a datum for recording elongation. The tension test load reported shall be recorded at one-eighth inch relative movement of the anchor and the adjacent masonry surface. Results of all tests shall be reported. The report shall include the test results as related to the wall thickness and joist orientation. The allowable resistance value of the existing anchors shall be forty percent of the average of those tested anchors having the same wall thickness and joist orientation. H. Qualification tests for devices used for wall anchorage shall be tested with the entire tension load carried on the enlarged head at the exterior face of the wall. Bond on the part of device between the enlarged head and the interior wall face shall be eliminated for the qualification tests. The resistance value assigned the device shall be twenty percent of the average of the ultimate loads. 4.7 INFORMATION REQUIRED ON PLANS - A. General. In addition to the seismic analysis required elsewhere in this Section, the person responsible for the seismic analysis of the building shall determine and record the information required by the section on the approved plans. B. Construction Details. The following requirements with appropriate construction details shall be made part of the approved plans: 1. All unreinforced masonry walls shall be anchored at the roof level by tension bolts through the wall as specified in Table A1-F, or by approved equivalent at the maximum anchor spacing of six feet. All unreinforced masonry walls shall be anchored at all floors with tension bolts through the wall or by existing rod anchors at a maximum anchor spacing of six feet. All existing rod anchors shall be secured to the joists to develop the required forces. The Building Official may require testing to verify the adequacy of the embedded ends of existing rod anchors. Tests when required shall conform to this section. When access to the exterior face of the masonry wall is prevented by proximity of an existing building, _~ wall anchors conforming to Item 5 in Table A1-F inay be used. Alternative devices to be used in lieu of tension bolts for masonry wall anchorage shall be tested as specified in Item H of this Section. 2. Diaphragm chord stresses of horizontal diaphragms 9 shall be developed in existing materials or by addition of new materials. 3. Where trusses and beams other than rafters or joists are supported on masonry, columns or ledgers shall be installed to support vertical loads of the roof or floor members. _, 4. Parapets and exterior wall appendages not capable of resisting the forces specified in this section shall be removed, stabilized or braced to insure that the -- parapets and appendages remain in their original position. 5. All deteriorated mortar joints in unreinforced masonry walls shall be pointed with cement mortar. Prior to any pointing, the wall surface shall have loose and deteriorated mortar removed. All preparation and pointing shall be done under the continuous inspection of a Special Inspector. At the conclusion of the project, the inspector shall submit a written report to the Building Official setting forth the portion of work inspected. 6. Repair details of any cracked or damaged unreinforced masonry wall required to resist forces specified in this section. C. Existina Construction. The following existing con- struction information shall be made part of the approved plans: 1. The type and dimensions of existing walls and the size and spacing of floor and roof inembers. 2. The extent and type of existing wall anchorage to floors and roof. 3. The extent and type of any parapet or other corrections which were previously performed. 4. Accurately dimensioned floor plans and masonry wall elevations showing dimensioned openings, piers, wall thickness and heights. 5. The location of cracks or damaged portions of unreinforced masonry walls requiring repairs. 6,. The type of interior wall surfaces and if reinstalling or anchoring of ceiling plaster is necessary. 7. The general condition of the mortar joints and if the joints need pointing. 10 TABLE N0. A1-A HORIZONTAL FORCE EACTORS BASED ON OCCUPANT LOAD OCCUPANT LOAD Building with an occupant load greater than 100 All others TABLE A1-B I FACTOR OCCUPANCY Essential Occupancies All others CKS 0.133 0.100 FACTOR 1.5 1.0 TABLE N0. A1-C HORIZONTAL FORCE FACTORS "IS" FOR PARTS OR PORTIONS OF STRUCTURES RATING CLASSIFICATION Ig Essential Buildings 1.50 Buildings with an Occupant load of greater than 100 1.00 All others 0.75 TABLE N0. A1-D ALLOWABLE VALUE OF HEIGHT-THICKNESS RATIO OF UNREINFORCED MASONRY WALLS WITH MINIMUM 9UALITY MORTAR (11 (2) BUILDINGS WITH CROSSWALLS AS ALL OTHER DEFINED BUILDINGS Walls of One Story Buildings 16 13 First Story Wall of Multi-Story Buildings 16 ~ 15 Walls in Top Story of Multi-Story Buildings 14 9 All Other Walls 16 13 Notes: -- (1) Minimum quality mortar shall be determined by laboratory testing in accordance with this section. (2) Table A1-D is not applicable to buildings classified as essential. Such buildings shall be analyzed in accordance with Section 806. The wall height may be measured vertically to bracing elements other than a floor or roof. Spacing of the bracing elements and wall anchors shall not exceed six feet. Bracing elements shall be detailed to minimize the horizontal displacement of the wall by components of vertical displacements of the floor or roof. 11 TABLE N0. A1-E VALUES FOR EXISTING MATERIALS(1) 1. , HORIZONTAL DIAPHRAGMS a. Roofs with straight sheathing and roo£ing applied directly to the sheathing. b. Roofs with diagonal sheathing and roofing applied @irectly to the sheathing. 100 lbs. per foot for seismic shear 400 lbs. per foot for seismic shear c. Floors with straight tongue and groove sheathing. d. Floors with straight sheathing and finished wood flooring. e. Floors with diagonal sheathing and finished wood flooring. 150 lbs. per foot for seismic shear 300 lbs. per foot for seismic shear 450 lbs, per foot for seismic shear f. Floors or roofs with Add 50 lbs. per foot straight, sheathing and plaster to the allowable values for applied to the joist or items l.a and l.c rafters. (2) 2. SHEAR WALLS Wood stud walls with lath and plaster 3. PLAIN CONCRETE FOOTINGS 4. DOUGLAS FIR WOOD 5. REINFORCING STEEL 100 lbs, per foot each side for seismic shear. f'=1500 psi unless otherwise shown by tests. Allowable stress same as NO. 1 D.F. (3) f= 18,000 lbs. per square inch maximum. (3) -N 6. STRUCTURAL STEEL f= 20,000 lbs. per square inch maximum. (3) Notes: (1) Material must be sound and in good condition. (2) The wood lath and plaster must be reattached to existing joists or rafters in a manner approved by the Department. (3) Stresses given may be increased for combinations of loads as specified in Section 106. 12 TABLE N0. A1-F ALLOWABLE VALUES OF NEW MATERIALS USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH EXISTING CONSTRUCTION NEW MATERIALS OR CONFIGURATION OF MATERIALS 1. HORIZONTAL DIAPHRAGMS Plywood•sheathing applied _ directly over existing straight sheathing with ends of plywood sheets beaiing on joists or -- rafters and edges of plywood located on center of individual sheathing boards. 2 3 4. SHEAR WALLS ALLOWABLE VALUES Same as specified in Table No. 25-J of the Building Code for blocked diaphragms. a. Plywood sheathing applied Same as values directly over existing wood specified in Table studs. No value shall be given No. 25-K of the to plywood applied over existing of the Building Code plaster or wood sheathing, for shear walls. b. Dry wall or plaster applied directlyover existing wood studs. 75 per cent of the specified in table No. 47-I of the Building Code. c. Dry waLl or plaster applied to plywood sheathing over existing wood studs. 33 1/3 percent of the values specified in Table No. 47-I of the Building Code. SHEAR BOLTS Shear bolts and shear dowels embedded a minimum of 8 inches into unreinforced masonry walls. Bolt centered in a 2 lL2 inch diameter hole with dry-pack or non-shrink grout around cir- cumference of bolt or dowel. (1)(3) 100 percent of the values for plain masonry in Table No. 24-G of the Building Code. No values larger than those given for 3/4 in. dia. bolts -- shall be used. TENSION BOLTS Tension bolts and tension dowels extending entirely through unreinforced masonry walls secured with bearing plates on far side of wall with at least 30 sq. inches of area. (2) (3) 5. WALL ANCHORS (Sec. 108 (b)) a. Bolts extending to the exterior Pace of the wall with a 2 1/2 inch round plate under the head. _, Install as specified for shear bolts. Spaced not closer than 12 inches on centers. (1) (2) (3) b. Bolts or dowels extending to the exterior face of the wall with a 2 1/2 inch round plate under the head and drill at an angle of 22 1/2 degrees to the horizontal. Installed as specified for shear bolts. (1) (2) (3) 1200 lbs. per bolt or dowel. 600 lbs. per bolt. 1200 lbs. per bolt or dowel. 13 TABLE NO. A1-F (continued) 6. INFILLED WALLS Reinforced masonry infilled openings in existing unrein- forced masonry walls with keys or dowels to match reinforcinq. 7. REINFORCED MASONRY Masonry piers and walls reinfor~ed per Chapter 24 of the Building Code. 8. REINFORCED CONCRETE Concrete footings; walls and piers reinforced as specified in Chapter 26 and designed for tributary loads. 9. EXISTING FOUNDATION LOADS Same as values specified for unreinforced masonry walls. Same as values specified in Table No. 24-B of the Building Code. Same as values specified in Chapter 26 of the Building Code. Foundation loads for struc- Calculated existing foun- tures exhibiting no evidence dation loads due to maxi- of settlement. mum dead load plus live • load may be increased 25 percent dead load, and may be increased 50 per- cent for dead load plus seismic load required by this section. Notes: (1) Bolts and dowels to be tested as specified in Sec. 107 (2) Bolts and dowels to be 1/2 inch minimum in diameter. (3) Drilling for bolts and dowels shall be done with an electric rotary drill. Impact tools shall not be used for drilling holes or tightening anchor and shear bolt nuts. TABLE N0. A1-G ALLOWABLE SHEAR STRESS FOR TESTED UNREINFORCED MASONRY WALLS SHEAR TESTS Eighty percent of test results in psi not less area (1) than Average test results Seismic in-plane of cores in psi 30 plus axial stress 20 3 psi 40 plus axial stress 27 4 psi 50 plus axial stress 33 5 psi 100 plus axial stress 67 or more 10 psi maximum or more (1) Allowable shear stress may be increased by addition of 10% of the axial stress due to the weight of the wall directly above. 14 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 24th upon the following vote: day of October 1989, AYES: BOARDP1EPIBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY, V~~I~JKLER, WASHBURN NOES: BOARDP1EMBERS: NONE ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE ABSTENTIONS: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE Red~lopmentuAgency~ City of Lake Elsinore TTEST: ! ~_ Ron Mole,dyk, Secretary Redevelop ent Agency AND LEGALITY: . ,....~r°I` r 15 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) 2, Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, _. DO HEP.EBY ~ERTIFY thzt th~ foregoing Resolubion duly adop~au uy ti,~ Redevelopment Aqency of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting of said Agency on the 24th day of Ootober, 1989, and that it was so adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY WASHBURN, WINKLER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE CITY OF T.;c'~~ ELSINORE __ (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. RDA 89-6 of said Aqency, and that the same has not been amended or repealed. D TED: ~Jctc~b~r 25, 1989 ~ ~ VICKI LYNNE ~AD~ CIT C ,RK CzTY OF LAK ELSINORE (SEAL) RESOLUTION NO. RDA 89-7 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBING A CERTAIN PROJECT; MAKING A STATEMENT OF THE PUBLIC USE FOR WHICH CERTAIN PROPERTIES TO BE TAKEN AND REFERENCE TO STATUTORY AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE SAID PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN; DESCRIBING THE GENERAL IACATION AND EXTENT OF SAID PROPERTY TO BE TAKEN; DECLARING FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS ON THE PUBLIC TNTEREST AND NECESSITY FOR SAID PROPERTY; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS TO SE COMMENCED IN SUPERIOR COURT TO ACQUIRE SAID PROPERTY INCLUDING APPLICATION FOR POSSESSION OF SAID PROPERTY PRIOR TO JUDGMENT; AND MAKING OTHER DETERMINATIONS WAEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore is a public entity organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of California; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City o£ Lake Elsinore intends to undertake a certain project for public purposes; and, WHEREAS, in order to accomplish said project, the Board of Directors believes that it is necessary to acguire by eminent domain certain property, hereinafter collectively called "subject property"; and, WAEREAS, pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Board of Directors has fixed a time and place for the public hearing on the matters referred to in Section 1240.030 of the Code of Civil Procedure; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has given each person who owns or claims a right in said subject property proposed to be acquired by eminent domain and whose name and address appears on the last Equalized County Assessment Roll noticed, a reasonable opportunity to be heard in the time, form and manner required by Section 1245.235 of the Code of Civil Procedure; and, WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore has complied with the requirements of Government Code Section 7267.2 in making a fair market value offer to acquire subject property; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearinq, the Board of Directors did hear and consider all testimony, written and oral, to the matters re£erred to in Section 1240.030 of the Code of Civil Procedure: NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section L That the above recitals are all true and correct. Section 2. That said subject property be taken by eminent domain is for a public use, to-wit: Acquisition of property for the construction of a public parking facility. HEREINAFTER called "Project"; and, Section 3. That the RedeveloFxnent Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore is authorized and empowered to commence eminent domain proceedings to acquire said subject property pursuant to the eminent domain law, being Title 7, Part III of trie Code of Civil Procedure. -2r Section 4. That a description of the general location and extent of said subject property to be taken by eminent domain is set forth on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 5. That this Board of Directors does find, determine and declare as follows: (a) That, to the extent acquisition of said subject property results in a remnant, said remnant shall be acquired by eminent domain herein, pursuant to Section 1240.410 of the Code of Civil Procedure; (b) That, to the extent that said subject property or interest therein is already appropriated to a public use, the proposed o£ the subject property will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of said public use as it presently exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, pursuant to Section 1240.510 of the Code of Civil Procedure; and (c) That, to the extent said subject property or interest therein is already appropriated to a public use, the use proposed herein is a more necessary public use than that use to which said subject property is presently appropriated, pursuant to Section 1240.610 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or, in the alternative, the use proposed herein is a compatible public use which will not unreasonably interfere with the continuance of the existing public use, pursuant to 1240.630(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. That this Board of Directors does hereby further find, determine and declare as follows: -3- (a) That the public interest and necessity requires the Project; (b) That said Project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; and (c) That said subject property sought to be acquired is necessary for said Project. Section 7. That Harper & Burns, Attorneys for the RedeveloFxnent Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore, are hereby authorized and directed to commence an action in the Superior Court of the State of California, for the County of Riverside, in the name and on the behalf of the Redevelo~nent Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore, against those persons who appear on record or who are known to have a claim or interest in said subject property described in the Exhibit "A", £or the purpose of acquiring said subject property by eminent domain for the public use described herein and to make application for possession of said subject property prior to Judgment. Section 8. That the officers of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore are hereby authorized and directed to withdraw necessary sums to deposit with the Superior Court as the probable compensation that will be awarded in the eminent domain proceedings to acquire said subject property described in Exhibit ~~ A~~ -4- Section 9. That the officers of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore are hereby avthorized and directed to take any appropriate action consistent with the purposes of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14th day of November , 1989. GARY W SHBURN, Chairman REDE OPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE LSIL~70RE ATTEST; _ ( VICKI LYAIt~ KASAD City Clerk CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVED AS TO FORM: HARPER & ~ ~,.~. ... ,.~..~ .... COUNSEL FOR REDE L PMENT AGENCY CITY OF LAKE ELSI RE -5- STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE j, Vicki LVnne Kasad , CITY CLERK of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing '- Resolution, being Resolution No. Rpq gg_7 was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency, approved and signed by the Chairman, and attested by the City Clerk, all at the reqular meeting of said Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency held on the 14th day of November , 198g , and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote: AYRES: BOARD MEMBERS: BUCK, DOPIINGUEZ, STARKEY, bIINKLER, u!ASFIBURPI NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: NOPJE ExECUTED this 15th day of fdovember , 198 9, at Lake Elsinore, California. City Clerk /~ City of Lakb~ElsinorE State of California [SEAL] (LE#13/Reso4/p.l-6) RESOLUTION NO. a~R 89-8 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF'LAKE ELSINORE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SETTING TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY TO ORDER THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore and the Board o£ Directors thereof intend to undertake a certain project generally described as follows: Acquisition of property for the construction of a municipal parking facility. Hereinafter called "Project"; and, WHEREAS, in order to accomplish said project, it appears necessary to acquire certain property, hereinafter called "Subject Property"; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to fix a time and place for a public hearing on the matter of the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to acquire said subject property by _ eminent domain, pursuant to Sections 1245.210 et seq. o£ the Code Civil Procedure; and, WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has received, considered and ordered filed in the office of the City Clerk a copy of a proposed Resolution of Necessity to acquire said subject property by eminent domain: NOW, THEREFORE, TAE BOARD OF DIRECTOR3 OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. 'I`hat the above Recitals are all true and correct. Section 2. That the acquisition of said subject property appears necessary to accomplish said project and that a proper and iege3 descriptian oi said su~jecc propercy is sec forth in sa~d proposed Resolution of Necessity, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. Section 3. That the Board of Directors hereby calls a hearing on the matter of the adoption of said Resolution of Necessity to acquire said subject property by eminent domain at the time and place specified as follows: DATE AND TIME PLACE TUESDAY, ELSINORE SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER 12, 1989 BOARD OF EDUCATION 7:00 P.M. MEETING ROOM 545 Chaney Street Lake Elsinore, California 92330 Section 4. That each person owning or claiming a right in said subject property to be acquired by eminent domain shall be given a reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard at said public hearing on the matter speci£ied as follows: (a) That the public interest and necessity requires the project; (b) That the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatable with the greatest public good and least private injury; and -2- (c) That the property sought to be acquired is necessary for said project. Section 5. That, pursuant to Section 1245.325 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to give mail notice of said public hearing, within fifteen (15) days prior thereto, first class and postage prepaid, to each person owning or claiming a right to said subject property proposed to be acquired by eminent domain and whose name and address appears on the last equalized County Assessment Roll. Section 6. That, for further particulars, reference is made to said proposed Resolution of Necessity on file in the office of the City Clerk and to Section 1245.235 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Sections related thereto. APPRO~JED AND ADOPTED this 14th day o£ November , 1989. ~~bW~'"__ GARY ASHBURN, Chairman REDE LOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ATTEST: ~` ~~.-~ ._ _ `1/~ ~, ..0 VICKI LY1~7E KASAD, City Cler`~c City of Lake Elsinore -3- APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOHN R. HARPER ~ Counsel for Red v lopment Agency of the Ci of Lake Elsinore STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE I~ ~~~k~ Lynne Ka~a~ , CITY CLERK of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. RDA 89-8 was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore, approved and signed by the Chairman, and attested by the City Clerk, all at the regular meeting of said Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore held on the 14th day of Pdovember , 198 9, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote: AYRES: BOARD MEMBERS~ BUCK, DOP1INGUEZ, STFlRKEY, 4!IhKLER, V'ASHBURN NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: NO~JE ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: fdONE -4- EXECUTED this 5~' day of ~~p~ , 198~, at Lake Elsinore, California. [SEAL] City Cler~ City of L e Elsinore State of California -5- (LE#13/Reso3/p.l-5) EXHIBIT A PARCEL 1: The East 1/2 of Lot 6 in Block 19 of Elsinore, as shown by Map on file in Book 6, Page 302 of Maps, San Diego County Records; EXCEPTING THEREFROM the South 6 feet thereof. PARCEL 2: The Northeast 30 feet of Lot 5 in Block 19 of Elsinore, as shown by Map on file in Book 6 Page 302 of Maps, San Diego County Records; EXCEPTING THEREFROM the North 6 feet thereof. Commonly known as: 110 W. Graham Avenue (APN #374-262-004 & O11). RESOLUTION NO. RDA 89-9 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE FINDING AND DECLARING THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING IN ALL PROJECT AREAS ARE BEING MET. WHEREAS, Section 33334.2 of the Redevelopment Law requires that for every redevelopment plan adopted after January 1, 1977, not less than twenty percent (20%) of Tax Revenues be set aside in a separate low and moderate income housing fund and be used for the purpose of increasing and improving the community's supply of low and moderate income housing, unless one of the £ollowing findings is made: 1. That no need exists in the community, the provision of which would benefit the project area, to improve or increase the supply of low and moderate income housing; 2. That some stated percentage less than twenty percent of the taxes which are allocated to the agency is sufficient to meet such housing needs; or 3. That a substantial effort to meet low and moderate income needs in the community is being made and that this effort, including the obligation of funds currently available for the benefit of the community_ from state, local and federal sources for low and moderate income housing alone or in combination with tax revenues is equivalent in impact to the funds otherwise required to be set aside; and WHEREAS, Resolution 89-1 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore made findings that all low and moderate income housing within the City, even though outside a project area, is of benefit to the project areas; and, WHEREAS, The guidelines defining low and moderate income housing as promulgated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development are the criteria for determining qualification of low and moderate income housing; and WHEREAS, the 1989 HUD guidelines as applied to Riverside RESOLUTION N0. RDA 89-9 County define the upper limit of income for low and moderate income housing purposes to be $38,640; and WHEREAS, the Regional Housing Needs Assessment for 1988, as published by the Southern California Association of Governments identifies for Lake Elsinore 4,705 total residential units of which 3,190 (67.8%) are classified as "LOwer Income Housing Units"; NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the housing available to low and moderate income families in the City of Lake Elsinore substantially exceed 20% of the total available housing. SECTION 2. The finding is made that the low and moderate income housing needs in the City of Lake Elsinore are being met and no need exists which the set aside of 20% of the tax increment revenue generated in any project area would serve to improve during the 1988/89 fiscal years. SECTION 3. The Secretary of the Agency will certify to the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November, 1989, upon the following vote: __ AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: BUCK, DOMINGUEZ, STARKEY~ WINKLER, WASHBURN NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: BOARDMEMBERS: __ ESTt RON MOLENDYK, SECRETARY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~ . i,~.~~ ~ . WASHBURN, CHAIRMAN OPMENT AGENCY CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVED S 0 FORM & LEGALITY: ~~_~! ~VY'~ ` JOHN R. HARPER~ LEGAL COUNSEL NONE +p J GAR~'~ REDE L RESOLUTION N0. RDA 89- 10 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBING A CERTAIN PROJECT; MAKING A STATEMENT OF THE PUBLIC USE FOR WHICH CERTAIN PROPERTIES, TO BE TAKEN AND REFERENCE mn STATT1TnRY ATTTH(IRT.TY TQ ,AC`C1T7TRF. RATTI PROPERTY BY EMIN~NT DOMAIN; DESCRIBING THE GENERAI, IACATION AND EXTENT OF SAID PROPERTY TO BE TAKEN; DECLARING FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS ON THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY FOR SAID PROPERTY; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS TO BE COMMENCED IN SUPERIOR COURT TO ACQUIRE SAID PROPERTY INCLUDING APPLICATION FOR. POSSESSION OF SAID PROPERTY PRIOR TO JUDGMENT; AND M&~KING OTfiER DETERMINATIONS WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore is a public entity organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of California; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore intends to undertake a certain ~ project for public~purposes; and, WHEREAS, in order to accomplish said project, the Board of Directors believes that it is necessary to acquire by eminent domain certain property, hereinafter collectively called "subject property"; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1245.235 0£ the Code of Civil Procedure, the Board of Directors has fixed a time and place for the public hearing on the matters referred to in Section 1240.030 of the Code of Civil Procedure; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has given each person who owns or claims a right in said subject property proposed to be acquired by eminent domain and whose name and address appears on the last Equalized County Assessment Roll noticed, a reasonable opportunity to be heard in the time, form and manner required by Section 1245.235 of the Code of Civil Procedure; and, wuFpgnc~ i~o Red~veleptn°^*_ AyenC~' of thc Citr cf Lake Elsinore has complied with the requirements of Government Code Section 7267.2 in making a fair market value offer to acquire subject property; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing, the Board of Directors did hear and consider all testimony, written and oral, to the matters referred to in Section 1240.030 of the Code of Civil Procedure: NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. Section 2. That said subject property be taken by eminent domain is for a public use, to-wit: Acquisition of property for the construction of a public parking facility. HEREINAFTER called "Project"; and, Section 3. That the Redevelognent Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore is authorized and empowered to commence eminent domain proceedings to acquire said subject property pursuant to the eminent domain law, being Title 7, Part III of the Code of Civil Procedure. -2- Section 4. That a description of the general location and extent of said subject property to be taken by eminent domain is set forth on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 5. That this Board of Directors does find,' determine and declare as follows: (a) That, to the extent acquisition o£ said subject property results in a remnant, said remnant shall be acquired by eminent domain herein, pursuant to Section 1240.410 of the Code of Civil Procedure; (b) That, to the extent that said subject property or interest therein is already appropriated to a public use, the proposed of the subject property will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of said public use as it presently exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, pursuant to Section 1240.510 of the Code of Civil Procedure; and (c) That, to the extent said subject property or interest therein is already appropriated to a public use, the use proposed herein is a more necessary public use than that use to which said subject property is presently appropriated, pursuant to Section 1240.610 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or, in the alternative, the use proposed herein is a compatible public use which will not unreasonably interfere with the continuance of the existing public use, pursuant to 1240.630(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. That this Board of Directors does hereby further find, determine and declare as follows: -3- (a) That the public interest and necessity requires the Project; (b) That said Project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public qood and the least private injury; and (c) That said subject property sought to be acquired is necessary for said Project. Section 7. That Harper & Burns, Attorneys for the Redevelo~nent Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore, are hereby authorized and directed to commence an action in the Superior Court of the State of California, for the County of Riverside, in the name and on the behalf of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore, against those persons who appear on record or who are known to have a claim or interest in said subject property described in the Exhibit "A", for the purpose of acquiring said subject property by eminent domain for the public use described herein and to make application for possession of said subject property prior to Judgment. Section 8. That the officers of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore are hereby authorized and directed to withdraw necessary sums to deposit with the Superior Court as the probable compensation that will be awarded in the eminent domain proceedings to acquire said subject property described in Exhibit ~~A~~ . -4- Section 9. That the officers of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore are hereby authorized and directed to take any appropriate action consistent with the purposes of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12th day of December 1989. GARY sHSUkZN, Chairman REDE OPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE LSINORE ST: VICKI LYN E KASAD City Cler - CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVED AS TO FORM: HARPER & BURNS ~unLV K. riNtCY COUNSEL FOR CITY OF LAKE AGENCY -5- STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE , I, Vicki L. Kasad , CITY CLERK of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing - Resolution, being Resolution NO. R.D.A. 89-10 was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency, approved and signed by the Chairman, and attested by the City Clerk, all at the Regular meeting of said Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency held on the 12th day o£ December , 198 9, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote: AYRES: BOARD MEMBERS sucx, DomrmGUSZ, STARKEY~ WINKLER NOES: BOARD MEMBERS NONE ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS NONE ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS WASHBURN EXECUTED this 12th day of at Lake Elsinore, California. December City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore State of California , 198 9 , [SEAL] (LE#13/Reso4/p.l-6)