HomeMy WebLinkAbout31736 CASINO DR_ 213-88 (3)l
141(1
GRADING AND COMPACTION CONTROL
PARCELS I THROUGH 5, TRACT 23710
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
Project No. 6S4W09 -38
November 9, 1288
At
J.
CASINO '`
L
1
tip•'
Prepared for:
Art Nelson, Incorporated
Post Office Box 939
Lake Elsinore, California 92330
Prepared by:
CALIFORNIA GEO TEK, INCORPORATED
42030 Avenida Alvarado, Suite A
Rancho California, California 92390
714) 676 -2782
I
I J-
I
i
i
I
i
I
5
Ir CALIFORNIA GEO TEK, INC.
42030 Avenida Alvarado. Suite_ A • Rancho California. CA 92390 • (714) 676.2782
November 9, 1988
Project No. 6S4W09 -38
INTRODUCTION
The compacted fill on the subject lots has been tested for compliance with
applicable City specifications. The work was authorized by Mr. Steve Brown a-'d
included: (1) inspecting the clearing and stripping, (2) inspecting the bottom
of overexcavation, (3) testing the recompaction of the overexcavated materials,
and (4) preparing this report presenting the findings and conclusions.
Plate 1 - Test Location Plan (20- scale, in pocket; 2 sheets)
Appendix A - Compaction Test Results
Appendix B - Maximum Density Curve
n
I
l
i
Ii
i
6S4WO9 -38
Page 2
FINDINGS
Proposed Development
Ten commercial buildings are proposed for construction with driveway approaches
indicated.
Site Conditions
The site is located on the northeast side of Casino Drive south of Railroad
Canyon Road in the City of Lake Elsinore. The site is flat with sheetflow
drainage, eventually flowing southerly towards Casino Drive. The site was
covered with annual grasses.
Grading
The reference for grading was a grading plan prepared by Butterfield Surveys
Lake Elsinore). The earthwork was performed by B & G Construction (Fontana)
from October 10 through October 21, 1988. The equipment used was a Caterpillar
523B scraper, a Caterpillar D5 dozer, a Caterpillar 12G blade, and a 3000 gallon
water truck. The native grasses were removed and were not used in the fill
materials.
The Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation prepared by this firm in August, 1988
states, "In building areas, the existing ground should be overexcavated to a
depth of 12 inches below the bottom of the proposed footing ". Building pad A
was overexcavated 3 feet below finish grade elevation with Building B ;
overexcavated 11 feet. Both pads were ripped 12 inches, moistened and
recompacted. Building pad G was an all fill pad and overexcavation was not a
required. Building pads B, C, D, E, F, H, I and J were all partially
overexcavated in the northwesterly portion of each pad. )
a
Determination of the depth of the overexcavation was made by the field a
technician, observing the grading full time. In several areas, denser material
was encountered which allowed shallower overexcavation and in some cases, `
overexcavation was not required due to the competent nature of the materials.
The building pads were ripped 12 inches, moistened and recompacted. +
a
The maximum fill thickness (above original ground surface) is approximately 3
feet. fhe fill materials were obtained from the cut portion of the project and
consisted of silty, medium to coarse sands with gravel.
Vertical cuts were placed along the northwesterly property line for the future
installation of retaining walls.
i
C I , I I
CLIENT Izopeng 82ow1:-5
PROJECT fiL%A Qwe NO-
HAR-rWF-LL JANTZ ENGINEFRING, INC.]
LOCATION LAiLs 'oj_h A
Structural Engineers
400 Ellis Wichita, Kansas 67211 (316) 262-0125 SUBJECT BY— CK-
DATE PG-:L OF—
21.(0
t
r6, Ir
94
AI r IS
I'STLt tillI . •/ -
j
Rm. ft AgiAL Lo^os
LL- 'ZO Ps
25
4S P5
w. 44' 5.+
11•
M.- 10.1
0
CLIENT
PROJECT _fj=_qu:t--NO-
HART-WELL ' JM TZ ENGINEF-RING, INC. LOCATION LAILA L51 JAUMA—C-Nelf-
Structural Engineers
400 Ellis Wichita. Kansas 67211 (316) 262-0125 SUBJECT By— CK
I
L DATE Pr'--L OF-
B I
HART -WELL JAN Z
Structural :ral EEng, F
14-+
14 z
ben Lem-rat- %,nvu
MI
law
N
9
4
CLIENT
PROJECT NO-
HARTWELL JANTZ ENGINEERING, INC.
LOCATION
Structural Engineers
dd
400 Ellis Wichita, Kansas 67211 (316) 262-0125 SUBJECT BY— CK
DATE PG-A-OF-
15§Arq j UWraLL Dss;e.,w
r
v
TF -I
20'.45 9
4.1
Mt- I f1ICR =LHM Sm
I (o n) 4 OW. h., 0: 90 I)j
KFqv 5fA ZZIS F61 155 1. 15 LDF
2.70 R
4.05 m
16.90 )s
Lovo c 45 x-
tOl
fz--.. -Z.
abw
116 - 3.50 B
MC 4.06- 11.92 D
foo'o S -.16.9 82.88
C2)11% -KL -493.99 1
2
0.03
0.20
97.08 v
285 v
MICR =LHM BPI
LoAo z 4"* fl- 6.00 L
0.40 IA1'
L 2j 1.15 LDF
e:, II. e lop
Tv- ke CS) 111/8 ML
81114'1
1.20 P,
66 901 10 1 V360 Cow). 1. 80 m
7.51 )s
ZS F" CPU-)
450
11.92 D
82.88 S
493.99 1
0.01
0.20 i.
43.14 v
285 v
it
r.
M
T
M
6SU09 -38
Page 3
Erosion Ccntrol
In the event of adverse weather conditions, prior to residential construction,
measures should be taken to minimize erosion damage. S„ourd di;nage occur (i.e.
gullies, washed out slop=, erosion scars, etc.) please contact this firm, or a
Registered Geotechnical Engineer, to inspect and recommend c:orrective measures
towards mitigating any probleris.
Compaction .Testing
The tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D1556 -82 (Sand Cone Test
Method) With the maximum density determined in accordance with ASTM D1557 -78.
The test locations are shown on Plate 1 and the results are summarized in
Appendix A.
I
I
I
I
I';
1
i
r
is
t.
r
6S4WO9 -38
Page 4
r CONCLUSIONS
1. The site was properly stripped prior to the overexcavation of the
materials.
i
2. The sparse vegetation was disced and used in the backfill of overexcavated
j materials.
i
3. The backfill of the overexcavated areas and fill materials have been
compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent based on
ASTM D1557 -78 (unweighted average - 94.1 percent).
4. The maximum depth of overexcavation ranges from 2 to 3 feet in vertical
dimension, measured from finish grade.
5. The bottoms of all overexcavations were properly precompacted and
premoistened to a depth of 12 inches prior to replacement of the
I overexcavated materials.
6. The maximum fill thickness above the original ground surface is
approximately 4 feet.
7. A total of 33 quality assurance tests were performed using the Sand Cone
Test Method (ASTM D1556 -82).
f
i
NGL /jl
Distribution: Addressee (4)
I
h
I ` '
Respectfully submitted,
i
Bruce R. Lee, P. E.
GE 509 ')S
Zv
oWC( No Una
Exp. 12.31.n
I' OF CAUE
APPENDIX A
Test Building Dry Density, pcf Moisture, Relative
No_ Pad Elevationl/ Field Max Field gDt Compaction,
1 B 1324.5 130.0 134.0 6.8 7.0 97
2 B 1325.5 130.2 134.0 9.2 7.0 2/
2A3/ B 1325.5 131.4 134.0 7.9 7.0 98
3 G 1337.6 132.2 134.0 7.4 1.Q 99
4 G 1339.0 126.7 134.0 7.2 7.0 95
5 G 1341.0 126.8 134.0 6.6 7.0 95
6 G 1341.0 126.2 134.0 8.5 7.0 94
7 A 1319.5 130.3 134.0 8.5 7.0 97
8 A 1319.5 116.6 134.0 6.0 7.0 87
8A3/ A 1319.5 123.0 134.0 7.0 7.0 92
9 G 1340.9 126.3 134.0 6.3 7.0 94
10 G 1342.9 120.4 134.0 6.2 7.0 90
11 4/ 1338.5 126.4 134.0 3.5 7.0 94
12 C 1326.1 125.8 134.0 5.6 7.0 94
13 E 1326.1 121.9 134.0 4.4 7.0 91
14 D 1331.0 123.1 134.0 7.2 7.0 92
15 F 1334.0 122.3 134.0 6.8 7.0 91
16 H 1338.0 120.9 134.0 7.3 7.0 90
17 H 1342.0 115.6 134.0 6.0 7.0 86
17A3j H 1342.0 118.8 134.0 5.7 7.0 89
1783/ H 1342.0 113.8 134.0 4.6 7.0 85
17C3/ H 1342.0 129.2 134.0 7.3 7.0 96
Ai
J r
N
1
CLIENT TJ1 ODAgr--
PROJECT - NO
HARTWELL JANTZ EN GI NEERING ' INC . LOCATION LAV8 G0514011- A We
S t ructural Engineers
400 Ellis Wichita, Kansas 67211 (316) 262.0125 SUBJECT BY- CK-
DATE PG-.L-OF- L---,
4.G
I
it .44
14
I-
3
L
4-
14-o17,
w .14
IF t.
OOTIM4I AXIAL LOADS
14
r- FOU LOAD &F
0
W
T414- vl'f'
w .14.
0 LVA" LOAD
w .14
iyh
CLIENT 222'04?- b(Z-2-146•5
PROJECT FULA 1111-f NC-
HARTWELL - JANTZ ENGINEERING, INC. TPOIZ 6, CA
Structural Engineers
JOCATIONlag-P- EQ ---M
400 Ellis Wichita, Kansas 67211 (316) 262-0125 SUBJECT BY CK-
DATE _&eL- PG OF-
Z/?
14
r
lo E
4-16. Sq I.z Iq
8 4,4
ZA
4-
A
r
15 = FD9 LOAD
14
F 'j,
Fp OT 164 el AXIAL LOANS
Affe-x So- 'BEPrz CnP
JZ.-\j f-,P- S..L RI-T-1
I -6 sq
r
CLIENT
t'o 1+
JI VI /I
PROJECT NO-
HARTWELL - JANTZ ENGINEIZRING. INC.
LOCATION
Structural Engineers
400 Ellis Wichita. Kansas 67211 (316) 262-0125 SUBJECT By- CK-
DATE PG-5-OF-
MICRO=LAII BM
9.00 L'
iSM 0.95 ICI;:.
1.15 LDF
LIAO
bL 4.28
40.15
R
J m - 9.
Vm, 5- 41
3.50
4z:
8
D
V06.
11.
4 AO" (pe) so. 2
154 'g ZSS ff-4 CO V-) 493-99
0.14
0.30
153,70 v
t:2 85 v
4-4* m
40
041
Its S. I" Co 1) 7. 16 L
6 o '-
0.59 IALF
qo
3 11 R
39.45
3.00
11.' D
33. -175 A
355.96
63.28
0.07
0. 3 E',
L/240 C...
69. 29 V
70.00 V
IN
CLIENT TJ1 ODAgr--
PROJECT - NO
HARTWELL JANTZ EN GI NEERING ' INC . LOCATION LAV8 G0514011- A We
S t ructural Engineers
400 Ellis Wichita, Kansas 67211 (316) 262.0125 SUBJECT BY- CK-
DATE PG-.L-OF- L---,
4.G
I
it .44
14
I-
3
L
4-
14-o17,
w .14
IF t.
OOTIM4I AXIAL LOADS
14
r- FOU LOAD &F
0
W
T414- vl'f'
w .14.
0 LVA" LOAD
w .14
iyh
CLIENT 222'04?- b(Z-2-146•5
PROJECT FULA 1111-f NC-
HARTWELL - JANTZ ENGINEERING, INC. TPOIZ 6, CA
Structural Engineers
JOCATIONlag-P- EQ ---M
400 Ellis Wichita, Kansas 67211 (316) 262-0125 SUBJECT BY CK-
DATE _&eL- PG OF-
Z/?
14
r
lo E
4-16. Sq I.z Iq
8 4,4
ZA
4-
A
r
15 = FD9 LOAD
14
F 'j,
Fp OT 164 el AXIAL LOANS
Affe-x So- 'BEPrz CnP
JZ.-\j f-,P- S..L RI-T-1
I -6 sq
EYT WALL LOAL)
K L1
v-
w .14
w 9.4
I.6 4
F
T-. MAX WALL LOAD
I!Ll" w1ot MAY,
ALL vm;, As S140tou but V mil. A" I
04L f.,, V,,, SOIL (!Af-
6
r
t'o 1+
JI VI /I
EYT WALL LOAL)
K L1
v-
w .14
w 9.4
I.6 4
F
T-. MAX WALL LOAD
I!Ll" w1ot MAY,
ALL vm;, As S140tou but V mil. A" I
04L f.,, V,,, SOIL (!Af-
6
t
i
r.
1.
I
4
II
I
j
Ii
i l
f.
kI
i
i
k
j
L
M 1
Hri l
NNE
ME
ISIMS
1
IN
Test Building Dry Density, pcf Moisture, Relative
No. Pad Elevationl/ Field max Field Opt Compaction, 9•
18 5/ 1342.3 124.6 134.0 5.9 7.0 93
19 A 1320.0 124.8 134.0 5.3 7.0 93
20 B 1325.5 124.0 134.0 4.2 7.0 93
21 5/ 1344.5 123.6 134.0 5.0 7.0 92
22 G 1343.0 117.3 134.0 3.1 7.0 88
22A3/ G 1343.0 127.3 134.0 7.8 7.0 95
23 I 1344.0 124.8 1.14.0 7.5 7.0 93
24 J 1346.5 117.5 134.0 6.8 7.0 88
24A3/ J 1346.5 121.7 134.0 5.0 7.0 91
25 6/ 1346.0 132.1 134.0 6.5 7.0 97
26 I 1345.0 122.0 134.0 4.4 7.0 91
27 H 1342.5 131.1 134.0 7.8 7.0 98
28 F 1338.5 132.0 134.0 8.5 7.0 99
29 5/ 1345.0 128.7 134.0 7.8 7.0 96
30 D 1335.0 126.7 134.0 6.7 7.0 95
31 J 1346.5 124.4 134,0 5.3 7.0 93
32 E 1331.5 124.3 134.0 4.3 7.0 93
33 C 1328.5 125.7 134.0 5.5 7.0 94
1/ Elevation of test in relation to finish grade as shown on grading plan
2/ Failing test due to pumping conditions
3/ Letter denotes retest
4/ Test taken in the parking lot northwest of Building C
5/ Test taken in the backfill over drainage pipe south of Building G
6/ Test taken in the parking lot north of Building J
1
0
A U
Ijc
12`
I
i 1zc
LL
u4
I L
i z
li o
IC 11
i o
is
I
10
II
f
APPENDIX B
I 0 5
N
I
1
ZERO AIR VOIDS CURVES
CLIENT Rocrsa i6 max, ax, c / AarjL =r
PROJECT i?szn 14u,r' NO '
HARTWELL - JANTZ ENGINEERING, INC.
Structuial Engineers LOCATION QS 1 f1Sdb GA,
400 Ellis Wichita, Kansas 67211 (316) 262 -0125 SUBJECT BYB L CKJ-J--
DATE. ia%'r y3S PG -L OF
0009 .z U86 1985
SraISMIG 2oKB a 4 4.
I
T
LOAo
W 1A 0 Baste: '31,C160 . r10 lost= j
IZooF 3 20 FS F' EyLP.. ..ej
VSA
r
D _LOA
Ti u: 12 P5f
51'a r,'P 3 _ _
IKS. 2
y aLsf .l
W ALt,t
S)1?
3/4"57Uw0 6 1's P
yz P1.y wo 2
Zxb et6 2
a 4qP 3
2.70 I lus 2 TATE C.
2.60 I'I my ,
o ••
sC
2.50
2)5 e YP (o MIS
I
x
Fa• "•
Z 3". q CHIiEC•
S PSP
s 130 s
10
MOISTURE CONTENT (% OF DRY WEIGHT) P.N. 6S4WO9.38 B i
NNE
ME
ISIMS
1
IN
t
IN
ME
MEN
ME
1
MIN mm- C1111
Ems
m
NONE
mom 00
ouiniii
EMONEEN
NEON
WEI
I
ENE
MORE
No
I 0 5
N
I
1
ZERO AIR VOIDS CURVES
CLIENT Rocrsa i6 max, ax, c / AarjL =r
PROJECT i?szn 14u,r' NO '
HARTWELL - JANTZ ENGINEERING, INC.
Structuial Engineers LOCATION QS 1 f1Sdb GA,
400 Ellis Wichita, Kansas 67211 (316) 262 -0125 SUBJECT BYB L CKJ-J--
DATE. ia%'r y3S PG -L OF
0009 .z U86 1985
SraISMIG 2oKB a 4 4.
I
T
LOAo
W 1A 0 Baste: '31,C160 . r10 lost= j
IZooF 3 20 FS F' EyLP.. ..ej
VSA
r
D _LOA
Ti u: 12 P5f
51'a r,'P 3 _ _
IKS. 2
y aLsf .l
W ALt,t
S)1?
3/4"57Uw0 6 1's P
yz P1.y wo 2
Zxb et6 2
a 4qP 3
2.70 I lus 2 TATE C.
2.60 I'I my ,
o ••
sC
2.50
2)5 e YP (o MIS
I
x
Fa• "•
Z 3". q CHIiEC•
S PSP
s 130 s
10
MOISTURE CONTENT (% OF DRY WEIGHT) P.N. 6S4WO9.38 B i
CLIENT Ropg me- 15rz2o14-5 --
LHARTWELL JANTz ENGINEERING, INC.
PROJECT fau llu r NO
Structural Engineers
LOCATION I-An
400 Ellis 'Wichita. Kansas 67211 (316) 262-0125 SUBJECT BY— CK
DATE -3 Lifalf AO, PG—'L OF --J
Z. O. (4)
Sti-lo
J j
sl
8.4t."
I a
e -a 14 -+ J
4-11"
SmIsmif- TL%w—o usc- 19 85 Zoo48 4
V= 2 1 14-CSW Zml-v t'm CSS.14 14 I-IS
1 '14
R
0
CLIENT
PROJECT
HARTWELL JANTZ ENGINEERING, INC.
LOCATION
NO LStructuralEngineers
CLIENT
400 Ellis Wichita. Kansas 67211 (316) 262-0125 SUBJECT BY— CK
DATE PG -A- 0
400 Ellis Wichita, Kansas 67211 (316) 262-0125 SUBJECT BY— CK-
woo o
DATE PGJ.—Dq- OF
solsmv— romAl-
11111AC AXIAL LoA0 Z-
511
7-06 MY e 50aZ4Eff
4,&- 48Z Ps) Roof-
17- 4100
4 8Z
a
S-n so t.49 1. 5,0 •
4
CLIENT Ropg me- 15rz2o14-5 --
LHARTWELL JANTz ENGINEERING, INC.
PROJECT fau llu r NO
Structural Engineers
LOCATION I-An
400 Ellis 'Wichita. Kansas 67211 (316) 262-0125 SUBJECT BY— CK
DATE -3 Lifalf AO, PG—'L OF --J
Z. O. (4)
Sti-lo
Jj
sl
8.4t."
I a
e -a 14 -+ J
4-11"
SmIsmif- TL%w—o usc- 19 85 Zoo48 4
V= 2 1 14-CSW Zml-v t'm CSS.14 14 I-IS
1 '14
R
0
Y,
WALL._
w
Pt ' 192 }+
624 >. x s3 = 4.1 Vttl 4.1 /
e.s' x 2 ? R-f
v
B.", A Z Y.
Veo- (4.1"+ .44-) /11'- U '7 PL
0-rt,l. 2414 x a 51 x8'.08
V- 14 C '
too
451'
4A C,
rAsla%q 01T M
W &'
w-(
7/3x q,47
10.385 W.
N
I
CLIENT
HARTWELL JANTz ENGINEERING, INC.
PROJECT NO
Structural Engineers LOCATION
400 Ellis Wichita, Kansas 67211 (316) 262-0125 SUBJECT BY— CK-
DATE PGJ.—Dq- OF
solsmv— romAl-
511
Roof-
Y,
WALL._
w
Pt ' 192 }+
624 >. x s3 = 4.1 Vttl 4.1 /
e.s' x 2 ? R-f
v
B.", A Z Y.
Veo- (4.1"+ .44-) /11'- U '7 PL
0-rt,l. 2414 x a 51 x8'.08
V- 14 C '
too
451'
4A C,
rAsla%q 01T M
W &'
w-(
7/3x q,47
10.385 W.
N
I