The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About265 SAN JACINTO_ 251-89 (20)GEOTEST •rurr An Environmental Monitoring and Testing Service FIELD LABORATORY RESULTS REPORT PREPARED FOR NACHANT ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF HYDROCARBON CONTENT BY INFRARED SPECTROMETRYEPAMETHOD418.1 DATE RECEIVED MAY 22, 1987DATEOFANALYSISy27 PROJECT NUMBER r 1987 CLIENT ID 86555 -26 2023 SAMPL_ E TD q CONCF,NTRATIIN 86558 -26- 2023 -7 (mg /kg) 90.6 Analyst:RB Rc-liewed & Approved: - - PP tIM'E: Samples were received in a chilled state, intact and withhain -of- Custody attached, r JUI. 1 uq' GEOTEST An Environmental Mondonng and Testing S elvice CON$UI.TANTJ, 7. N- Analyst : RB Reviewed & A' PProv () NOTE: Samples were received in a chilled state, intact and withChain -of- Custody attached. GEOTEST is a division of GEOSEIVICES, a California corporation EXHIBIT 110. 2 GEOTEST a division of GEOSERVICES, a Cafilornn cerperalion EXHIBIT NO. 2 GEOTEST is a division of GEOSERVICES, a California corporation rErXHIB ToslOfficeBox90911LungBeach, C tilornia 90809.091 1 (Piave 3 of 3) Post 011ice 8ox 90911 Long Beach, California 90809.0911 1213(498.9515 1800) 624•S7t Q4 I NO. 213) 498.9515 1800) G24.5744 Posl Ullicr r ?ax 9091 t 1_onq Beach, Calilnm,a Page 1 Of {) Page 2 Of 3 ) 90809.09l l (2131 499.9515 (11001 (124.5744 CHOU & COMPANY BSHEETNO. a400S. ATLANTIC BLVD., SUITE 309 MONTEREY PARK, CA 91754 CALCULATED BY —_DATE S1 S) 570.1162 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE V rLA 67 Ste} n,w"i h C.Tz: e G•Qe- cv.o n-I is "+w n a 11.e-. rotL p C rrT_ 2>0 L T. S(wi441e16 (D Scvn <<-e r J&% CA4 C*- ooh x Yv ° -2,o It- CHOU & COMPANY 400 S. ATLANTIC BLVD., SU. E 309 MONTEREY PARK, CA 91754 816) 570.1162 Joe SHEET NO. Of CALCULATED BY —DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE L " h (9 Slim,(- r' L'I fL' PO /bo/ l Tr r 10 ra to r 1 I W4-M. r/ 101 r CHOU & COMPANY 400 S. ATLANTIC BLVD., SUITE 309 MONTEREY PARK, CA 91754 61 S) 570.1162 JO SHEET NO. -- — O' CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DAYS SCALE — L/ 64 v = °X (ZS pal /1e(' = X12 41, wA'Th - ?° 1 T#W ("taj A vk = I boy q vs 4- 30 V qo Icy P)Fv 7.) q u L , i r wl to a v-A e co = 9 -7,06 tkk z' FA r pr--or Fon- = x u x 6,+ Fir— - qbo i I I 4 . IV TITLE 24 REPORT FOR; i ARCO OFFICEw SAN CLEMENTE PROJECT DESIGNER; M BRADBERRY SAN DIEGO,CA 254 22.80 OWNER; SAM LEE 135 LIVE OAK, #202 ARCADIA,CA REPORT PREPARED BY; M.BRADBERRY AN DIEGO , CA 294 2200 Job Number; 001 Date: 1/4/1900 Table Of Contents for Title 24 Report. CoverPage ........................... ............................... 1 Table of Contents 2 Form CF -18 Certificate of Compliance; Nonresidential ................ 3 orrn41F -1 Mandatory Measures Checklist ....... ...................... 6 Forrri,YS -1A Energy Budgets Worksheet .. ............................... 8 Future Nonres Report ................. ............................... 10 Form CF -2 Envelope Summary u Worksheet 11 Form SCM Performance Run ............. ............................... 14 Form CF -3 Construction Assemblies .... ............................... 62 Form CF -4 HVAC Summary ............... ............................... 60 Form WS -4 HVAC System Summary Sheets . ............................... 65 Form CF -5 Lighting Summary ................... 73 w The CIOLY 24 computer program has been used to perform the calculations summarized in this corr•pliance report. This program has interim approval and is authorized by the California Energy Commission for use with the Second Generation Nonresidential Building Energy Efficiency Standards for Nonresidential Occupancies. Second Generation Residential Occupancies siiown to comply with this program conform to the results produced by thePublicDomainPoint. System, developed by the California Energy Commission. This program developed by Michael Gabel Assor-iat.es (415) 4218 - 0:303. i if f SIC. :. ... i CERTIKICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 1 of 3) N --------------------------------------- Project: ARC:O OFFICE Designer; M. BRADBERRY Locatiol : Elsinore Documei•rtation: M.BRADBERRY CF -1B- page 3 of 73 i COMPLY 24 v 2.24 i Building Permit No Date; 1/4/1580 i Checked By-- - - - - -- i ' Date (User # 2180) PRINCIPAL DESIGNER. The proposed building will be in substantialcomp *.ante with the California Building Energy Efficiency Standardsprovideditisbuiltaccordingtotheplansandspecificationsand providedfutul4 improvements are completed according to the requirements indicatedanthisCertificateofCompliance. The plans and specifications have beenpreparedtoincludeallsignificantenergyconservationfeaturesrequiredforcompliancewiththeStandards. Building areas that are unconditionedand /or not subject to the standards are indicate) on the plans. Plans Dated; / / C 1 - - - - -- Specs Dated; Signature; nDate: 4 - - - - -- M. BRADBERRY 254 2280 SAN DIEGO,CA Cal. License No;_______________ OWNER. The energy conservation features and performance specificationj. indicated on this document and on the plans and specifications shall applytofuturealterations, unless compliaqce is demonstrated anew and a newCertificateofComplianceissubmitted. A copy of this Certificate will beretainedandtransmittedtofuturetenants, subsequent owners or otherswithresponsibilityformakingimprovementsormodificationstothebuilding. If this cert.ificat.e is lost, a new Certificate may be• requiredbeforeapermitisissuedforalterations. Unconditioned areas areindicatedontheplansand, if these areas are conditioned ,in the future, they must. be made to comply with the applicable energy standards then ineffect. Signature: Date; SAM LEE 135 LIVE OAf :::, #202 ARC:ADIA, CA ENFORCEMENT AGENCY. The proposed building, and future alterations willcomplywiththeCaliforniaBuildingEnergyEfficiency 'tandards, providedf.ture alt.erat• ions meet. the requirements indicated on this Certifi_ate andz.11 applicable mandatory measures, as 101-19 as the building occupancy typeremai,2s unchanged. ignat.ure; Date; Nanie : Agency ; ----- ---•- - - - -- Address: Ci ty / :tat.e /Zip • __ - - -- _ - -- - ----------------------------- 1, ARCO Petroleum Products Company fits South rluwet Street —• Lo. Angeles. Cdldonuo 90071 i1 `'• A• 1 C u Telephone 213 -186 0325 ` J ,1. C"Ib• Properly Manager Planp.Mg Dept. RAat Estate October 28, 1988 1 I' Mr. Soon -Tung Hsieh 2441 Lazy Brook Lane Hacienda Heights, CA 91745 Re: Railroad Canyon /Highway 71 Lake Elsinore, CA ARCO #3067 Dear Mr. Hsieh: Pursuant to your request and to Provision 18 of the Agreement of Sale dated September 26, 1988 between Atla.ttic Richfield Company ( "Seller ") and Soon -Tung Hsieh ( "Buyer "), enclosed herewith is the soils test report on the above captioned site. Please be advised that in accordance with said Provision 18 Seller intends to proceed with this sale and Buyer shall have 30 days to review the soils test results. Very c J. J. Coffey Property Mapa Real Estate; Encl cc: Dave Vosburgh K. H. Flynn AIICo 11,, ,b :urn vwtlacK L ;nn,p, y , n 0, ;, nn,f A11anucn¢b0eIdc0mpany pioneer consultants 25t TENNESSEE STREET • REOLANOS. CALIFORNIA 92379 . 17141 797.2691 J.N. 4232 -005 August 10, 1987 Atlantic Richfield Company 17315 Studebaker Road Cerritos, California 90701 Attention: Mr. Joe Tully Re: Abandonment of ARCO Gasoline Station Northwest Corner, San Jacinto River Road and Casino Drive Lake Elsinore Area, Riverside County, California Subject: Identification of Subsurface Contamination After Removal of Underground Storage Tank Gentlemen: At the request of Ms. Sandy Bunchek with the County of Riverside, Department of Health, Hazardous Materials Division, we have reviewed the information obtained from the soil sampling conducted during the removal of four underground storage tanks at the referenced site. It is the intent of this letter to present the results of that sampling and the conclusions and recommendations drawn therefrom. That informa- tion obtained and generated is presented below for your examination. BACKGROUND INFORMATION A site assessment of the subsurface, performed by Pioneer Consul- tants (J.N. 4232 -005, dated May 15, 1987) did not identify the pres- ence of soil contamination at the sampling locations. These findings were based on the chemical analyses of the soil samples obtained from four borings and six surface locations (adjacent to, below and over- lying the underground tanks). TANK REMOVAL OPERATION After the completion of the subsurface evaluation, the underground tanks at the site were removed. The soil beneath the removed tanks was sampled by a representative of Nachant Environmental Inc. of San Diego, California. All of the samples that were analyzed were taken from a depth of 2 feet below the lank bottoms. The samples were placed in containers and sealed by the County of Riverside. At the time the samples were collected, no odors were detected, and the County of Riverside gave tentative authorization to backfill the exca- vation. The locations of the soil samples collected during this work are presented on Exhibit 1. J.N. 4232 -005 ` Atlantic Richfield Company August 1o, 1987 Page 2 LABORATORY ANALYSES The soil samples collected from the above work were then taken under the custody of Nachant Environmental Inc. to Geotest of Long Beach, California, for laboratory analyses. Samples 1, 3 and 5 were sub- jected to modified EPA Test Method 8015 to determine the nonhalo- genated volatile organic content. Sample 7, taken below the waste oil tank, was subjected to tests to determine total petroleum hydrocarbon content by EPA Test Method 418.1 and total lead content. A copy ofthelaboratoryresultsareattachedforyourinspection. RESULTS The results of the laboratory testing referenced above indicate that, at locations 5 and 7, some level of contamination was identified. The analyses of Sample 5 indicated the nonhalogenated volatile organic content to be 341.4 parts per million (ppm). The analyses of Sam- ple 7 indicated the total petroleum content to be 90.6 ppm and the total lead content to be 8 ppm. Samples 1 and 3 indicated no con- tamination present. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the chemical analyses from samples taken curing the tank removal, it has been determined that soil contamination is present at the northeast corner of the three -tank cluster at sample location No. 5. In addition, some low levels of contamination may be presentdirectlybeneaththewasteoiltank. In all cases, except soil Sample 5 taken from the northeast corner of the three -tank cluster, contamination indications were below designated action levels. Information from borings done at this site (May, 1987) indicate that from 17 to 21 feet below the ground surface, dense bedrock material was encountered. In addition, no groundwater was encountered within the borings performed at this site. Considering the information provided above and the subsurface eval- uation performed by Pioneer- Consultants (May, 1987), it is our opin- ion that the contamination above action levels identified at Sample 5 is a small and isolated location and does not represent a significant source of contamination. Furthermore the contamination identified in Sample 7 below the waste oil tank is below action levels, and was not encountered in an angle boring performed directly below this tankduringtheMay1987study. It would be our recommendation, based upon that provided, that no additional work or investigation of this site is necessary. It is hoped that regulatory concurrence will be received in this matter. 4 .h e CERTIRIC:ATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 2 of _;) CF -1B page 4 of 73 1Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project.; ARCO OFFICE COMPLY 24 v - 4 Designer: M. BRADBERRY I Building Permit. No Location; Elsinore Date: 1/4/1980 , Checked By Documejitation: M.BRADBERRY ----- -- ---- 1 Date (User # 2180) ENERGY ANALYST. The energy performance analysis summarized below was perf%rmed using an approved CEC calculation Method, with CEC approved fixeu'and restricted engineering inputs for the applicable climate zone and occupancy type, and using a reasonable representation of buildingzonirAgandphysicalconfiguration. All significant energy conservationfeaturesarelistedbelow, 0.81 Nance 294 2280 Rated Heating Output 6921'100 Company------------------------ GENERAL REFERENCE Economizer Cooling? No 1 Unconditioned or Multi- tenant Shell? 19 Simultaneous Heat/Cool? 2 CEC Occupancy Type City /St• a_te_ / Z_ip _ __________ Office Other Requirements: 3 UBC Occupancy Group /Division Telephone -___ - License - - - - - -- 4 Climate Zone W.S -_1A 105ConditionedFloorAreaWS-1A 15b94 sgft5UnconditionedFloorAreaUsgft7BudgetTable (from Standards) 1988 ed. Sec 2 -.53P. 8 Allowed Energy Budget WS-1A 145.09CalculationMethodCECCode /Date CPD -07 6/28/1988 Reference 10 Multiplier SCM -2 1.02711CalculatedEnergyUseWS -1A 115.3 kBtu /sqft -yr ENVELOPE REQUIREMENTS 12 Average Roof /Ceiling Rt CF -2 28.14 h- F -sgft• /Btu13AverageExteriorFloorRtCF -2 0.00 h -F -sqft /Btu14AverageOpaqueWallRtCF -2 14.99 h -F -sqft /Btu15GlazingAreainWallCF -2 756 sgft• 16 Average SC (Glazing in Wall) CF -2 0.7617GlazingAreainRoofCF -2 0 sqft18AverageSC (Glazing in Roof) CF -2 0.00 LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS 19 Allowed Whole Building LPD CF -5 1.500 watts /= -qft• 22 Package Lighting Reduction WS-1A 0.000 watts /sgft23LightingControlsRequired? CF-.5 Y /N) MECHANICAL REQUIREMENTS 24 System Type 25 Unit Fan Power CF -4 0.505 watts /cfm26RatedCoolingEfficiencyCF -4 8.50 EER) 2:7 Rated Cooling Capacity CF -4 47=:600 Btu /hr 28 Rated Heating Efficiency CF-4 0.81 SSE /COP) 29 Rated Heating C:apy.city CF -4 6.92000 Btu /hr30EconomizerCooling,.- CF -4 No31CF -1X Attached? Y /N) 14 PERTIFICATE -OF COMPLIANCE (part 3 of 3) CF -16 page 5 of 722 Project.: ARCO OFFICE 1 COMPLY 24 v 2.24 1 Designer; M. BRADBERRY 1 building Permit No Location: Elsinore ; `------------ - - Date; 1/4/1580 Checke-d - By - Documentation; M.BRADBERRY 1 Date (User # 2180) Nate; More than one Part 3 may be submitted, but all must reference the ssme4ILParts 1 & 2. The person responsible for preparing the compliance documentation for each major building system acknowledges the followingcompl,iance statement by signing the appropriate space below. Compliance Statement. The proposed building improvements substantiallycomplywiththerequirementsindicatedontheCertificateofCompliance for this building, dated ....... The plans and specifications include the significant energy conservation features a.•d the compliance documentation is consistent with the plans and specifications. ENVELOPE P.-:-Posed 1 Average Roof /Ceiling Rt 28.14 2 Average Exterior Floor Rt 0.00 3 Average Opaque Wall Rt 14.53 4 Glazing Area in Wall 756 S Average SC (Wall) 0 76 6 Glazing Area in Roof U 7 Average SC (Roof) O.00 Other Requirements: Improvements______ Plans Dated -------- Specs Dated Signature ----------------- Name___ Company Address - City /S'tate /Zip_______ - - - - -- Telephone_ _ License Enforcement Agency----- -- - - - - -- LIGHTING Proposed Improvements 8 Basis of Allowed LPD Performance Flans Dated _ Specs Dated9LPD1.500 -- - - - - -- 10 Package Lighting Reduction 0.000 Signature ----------------- 11 Adjusted LPD 1 - - - - - -- 500 Ndfiie 2 Light•irg Control Credits? _____ C :ornpany__________ _ _ _ _ __ Other Requirements: Address --- --------- --------------- City/ State /Zip_________________ _______ Telephone ............. License Enforcement Agency------- - - - --- ME.C:HANIC:AL Proposed Improvements Project; ARCO OFFICE - 13 Urw t Fan Power 0.505 Flans Dated Specs Dated- - - - --- 14 Rated Cooling Efficiency S•. S0 15 Rated Cooling Capacity 473600 Signature E• Rated Heating Efficiency 0.81 Nance 17 Rated Heating Output 6921'100 Company------------------------ 18 Economizer Cooling? No Address 19 Simultaneous Heat/Cool? No City /St• a_te_ / Z_ip _ __________ Other Requirements: Telephone -___ - License - - - - - -- Certified Luminaires /Ballasts per Sec. 2- 5314(b) Enforcement. Agency MANDATORY MEASURES CHECKLIST (part 1 of 2) MF_1 ppage 66 of 73 Project; ARCO OFFICE - 1 COMPLY 224 v 2.24 Designer; M. E :RADBERRY -- ---- - 1 Building PPermit No Location: Elsinore Date: 1/4/1980 1 Checked BBy Documentation: M.BRADBERRY '------------------ 1 Date (User # 2160) ENVELOPE MEASURES a RReference o Certified Insulation Materials per Sec. 2- 5311(a) o Insulation Installed to meet Flame Spread and Smoke DensityRequirementsofSec. 2- 5311(b) & r /J_Z o Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation Installed per Sec. 2- 5311(c) o Retrofit Insulation specified per Sec. 2 -5313 o Air Infiltration is minimized by specification of tes *ed manufactured doors and windows and proper sealing andweatherstrippingpperS 51l, j A_ 2 LIGHTING SYSTEM MEASURES Certified Luminaires /Ballasts per Sec. 2- 5314(b) Independent Control within enclosed Areas per Sec. 2- 5319(a) AA19 Manual Switching Readily Accessible per Sec. 2- 5319(b) Reduction of Lighting '..oad to at least 50% per Sec. 2- 5319(c)' Occupancy Sensors cc.r Programmable Timers meeting CECCriteriamaySubstitute) - Separate Switching of Daylit Areas per Sec. 2- 5319(d) L Separate Switching of Display and Valance Lighting inRetail / Wnolesale Occupancies pper Sec 2- 5319(h) Automatic Control of Display Lighting in Retail /WholesaleOccupanciesperSec. 2- 5319(h) Tandem Wiring of 1 and 3 Lamp Luminaires per Sec. 2- 5319(h) DAYLIGHTING AND LUMEN MAINTENANCE CONTROLS (when applicable) R Reference o Uniform Illumination reduction to .50% per Sec. 2- .5319(e).1 I o Flicker Free Operation and no Premature Lamp FailureperSec. 2- 5319(e).2 o T' D 1 aairre ys Lo Prevent Undesirable C: clin. Y 3 per Sec. 2- 5319(c).3 /V I i i J.N. 4232 -005 '- Atlantic Richfield Company August to, 1987 Page 2 LABORATORY ANALYSES The soil samples collected from the above work were then taken under the custody of Nacliant Environmental Inc. to Geotest of Long Beach, California, for laboratory analyses. Samples 1, 3 and 5 were sub- jected to modified EPA Test Method 8015 to determine the nonhalo- genated volatile organic content. Sample 7, taken below the waste oil tank, was subjected to tests to determine total petroleum hydrocarbon content by EPA Test Method 416.1 and total lead content. A copy ofthelaboratoryresultsareattachedforyourinspection. RESULTS The results of the laboratory testing referenced above indicate that, at locations 5 and 7, some 'revel of contamination was identified. The analyses of Sample 5 indicated the nonhalogenated volatile organic content to be 341.4 parts per million (ppm). The analyses of Sam - pie 7 indicated the total petroleum content to be 90.6 ppm and the total lead content to be 8 ppm. Samples 1 and 3 indicated no con- tamination present. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the chemical analyses from samples taken during the tank removal, it has been determined that soil contamination is present at the northeast corner of the three -tank cluster at sample location No. 5. In addition, some low levels of contamination may be presentdirectlybeneaththewasteoiltank. In all cases, except soil Sample 5 taken from the northeast corner of the three -tank cluster, contamination indications were below designated action levels. Information from borings done at this site (May, 1987) indicate that from 17 to 21 feet below the ground surface, dense bedrock material was encountered. In addition, no groundwater was encountered within the borings performed at this site. Considering the information provided above and the subsurface eval- uation performed by Pioneer Consultants (May, 1987), it is our opin- ion that the contamination above action levels identified at Sample 5 is a small and isolated location and does not represent a significant source of contamination. Furthermore the contamination identified in Sample 7 below the waste oil tank is below action levels, and was not encountered in an angle boring performed directly below this tank during the May 1987 stuuy. It would be our recommendation, based upon that provided, that no additional work or investigation of this site is necessary. It is hoped that regulatory concurrence will be received in this matter. J.N. 4232 -005 " Atlantic Richfield Company August 10, 1987 Page 3 It is our hope that the information presented above is sufficient for your needs. Should you have any questions, please contact this office. Respectfully, PIONEER CONSULTANTS Michael R. Johnson Staff Geologist Kyle D. Emerson, C.E.G. #1271 Vice President KDE:MRJ:Ijs Addressee t2) Attachments cc: Mr. Joe Tully Mr. Ken Lanz California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Santa Ana Region, Attention: Ms. Ann Knight County of Riverside, Attention: Ms. Sandy Bunchek WQ 0 oa ti W a tip 773?~ oo ,9 ga r- a W to e -lo oQro2 Y JIQq JL'U ~ W rZahAQj &Z n Wp't+ W xWx Z I Wf-W LL W ID Qr411 Z "t W< a a V I: J J n9 0 L a R a I 3 y o f 0 / 0 0 WC r 8, J O V rj YI oe° 3 D 13 4 IL IQ O n1 W oLibo ri 6 I Ul r WQ 0 oa ti W a tip 773?~ oo ,9 ga r- a W to e -lo oQro2 Y JIQq JL'U ~ W rZahAQj &Z n Wp't+ W xWx Z I Wf-W LL W ID Qr411 Z "t W< a a V I: J J n9 0 L a R a I