The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About265 SAN JACINTO_ 182-90eAAD[ , CC CURD A C PAVING iV PIE 3/B R P C C CURB — A C PAVING — FL'.( EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING EXISTING BUILDING I F HYDRANT N 72 °42'07" W 186.00 CURS AT SIDEWALK •-1tIN k" AC PAVAIC .N PCC p aV TER L, e.s( — SUBGRAD( GUTTER NOT TC SCALE C N WATEM SURFACE& J 4HrI Le y•0. D VK:NTY MAP 2 O h V r PROPOSED 2 STORY OFFICE BUILDING 1]I FINISH FLOOR 85.00' PAD ELEVATION 84.50' J II a 61I 5 '• p14' ti` - I Y Orr ul 1 I ie I p z g o 5 Ib-O 24'-a'. ,• .1 1° t IZ 12 -a . IC° Ida. n ^.. a L 1111 PLANTER ' i . ma c 47 ONSITEi 1. CONSTRUCTION - 2 1/2' A.C. PAVDHENT BAS( L 6' CDNCRZTE CURS PER DET. A 6 S 3. CONSTRUCTION - 36' CONCRETE GUTTER PER DET. C 4. CONSTRMCTION - BRICK PAVERS S. CONSTRUCTION - HANDICAP RAMP Ate..:: 6,. CONCRETE BLOCK 1^,. S[6 MCI. DRAWINGS 7. CONSTRUCTION - CONCRETE SWALE PLANTER CUR? 'c scALr A EST0IIWIM EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 4 " CC SIOFWALk —r 3/B R P C C CURB — A C PAVING — FL'.( EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING EXISTING BUILDING I F HYDRANT N 72 °42'07" W 186.00 CURS AT SIDEWALK •-1tIN k" AC PAVAIC .N PCC p aV TER L, e.s( — SUBGRAD( GUTTER NOT TC SCALE C N WATEM SURFACE& J 4HrI Le y•0. D VK:NTY MAP 2 O h V r PROPOSED 2 STORY OFFICE BUILDING 1]I FINISH FLOOR 85.00' PAD ELEVATION 84.50' J II a 61I 5 '• p14' ti` - I Y Orr ul 1 I ie I p z g o 5 Ib-O 24'-a'. ,• .1 1° t IZ 12 -a . IC° Ida. n ^.. a L 1111 PLANTER ' i . ma c 47 ONSITEi 1. CONSTRUCTION - 2 1/2' A.C. PAVDHENT ENT N MEMORY OF HOWARD M. BLACK, CCMOR., POST 1508, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, OVER 4' CLASS 3 RASE 2. CONSTRDCI'ION - 6' CDNCRZTE CURS PER DET. A 6 S 3. CONSTRUCTION - 36' CONCRETE GUTTER PER DET. C 4. CONSTRMCTION - BRICK PAVERS S. CONSTRUCTION - HANDICAP RAMP 6. CONSTRUCTION - CONCRETE BLOCK THEN ENCLOSURE S[6 MCI. DRAWINGS 7. CONSTRUCTION - CONCRETE SWALE TEMECULA, CALIF. 92390 PER DET. D EST0IIWIM EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: CUT: 560 yde. FILL- 500 yde. 3, n r P h ' T a s p 9; 41 W D 1 r I I I I V'roBEE DETD awns 2s?' / Jj' i" \ Rr' • ' , I li 4 I gg 21.2i• s 1 1 22,668 SQ. FT. \ `,` `` \ • 1,2E3 LIN PT. 203 LIN FT. a 612 SQ. FT. 1 EA. 14 `• ' \ 1 33 LIN FEET `• ` \ ` \Y I I I GENERAL NOTES I 1. NOTE TO CONTRACTORS: THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPES OR STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS MERE OBTAINED BY A SEARCH OF AVAIL- ABLE RECORDS. APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE REPRESENTATION AS TO THE ACCURACY OR CAWLETENESS OF THE LOCATION NOR THE EXISTENCE OF ANY UIVERGROEW UTILITY PIPE OR STRUCTURES WITHIN TI£ LIMITS OF THE PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR IS R OUIRED TO TAKE ALL DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL UTILITIES, PIPES OR STRUCTURES, WHETHER THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED OF REPLACED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE GOVERNING AGENCY BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENCE. 2. ALL MORK SHALL CONFORM TO CITY CODES, STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS LATEST EDITION, AAD STANDARD DRAWINGS. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RE- SPONSIBILITY TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THESE STANDARDS AND CODES AT ALL TIMES. 3. THE SMALL CALOI INSPECTOR T RIORTBE6NNNGANMA. L R NSP ION AWORKS 1 1 -4 EX 35 BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 9:00 AM TO 4:00 PM MONDAY THROUoW FRIDAY. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TRAFFIC CONTROL IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALTRANS TRAFFIC MANUAL AND MATCH MAAWL AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION AS AP- PROVED BY CITY ENGINEER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL REWIRE IMMEDIATE MM STOPPAGE. S IT SHALL BE THE RESPONIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ARRANGE FOR THE AECES- SARY RELOCATION OF ANY UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES INVOLVED AT LEAST 48 MRS. PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. I-800- 22 -4133 URDERGR70UND SERVICE ALERT. y IT SHALL BE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO HAVE A RESPONSIBLE r1EPRESEN- TATIVE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. 7. THE COMRWCTOR SMALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CLEARING OF THE PROPOSED YORK AREA AND RELOCATION AAD COST OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. SUBDIVIDER I e MUST IAFORM CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE OF CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL L DEROWAD FACILITIES WITH LATERAL SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO PAVING THE STREET SECTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SEDER, MATER, TELEPHONE A ELECTRICITY, GAS AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES. I 9. ALL STREET SECTIONS ARE TENTATIVE. ADDITIONAL SOILS TESTS WILL 3E TAKEN AFTER ROUGH GRADING TO DETERIMME THE EXACT SECTION REQUIRED. SECTION THICKNESSES SHOWN ARE FOR BONDING PURPOSES ONLY. JO* ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES MUST BE POINOLES AND ELEVATIONS VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY NECESSARY REV'SIOMS TO THE APPROVED PLANS. THE RE- VISIONS SHALL BE IN THE FORM OF AS BUILT' PLANS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY I ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT RY THE CITY ENGINEER. 11. ALL EXISTING MOM.IENTATION DISTURBED OR DESTROYED DURING CONSTRUCTION SMALL W I BE REPLACED TO CITY STANDARDS AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. CENTER- LINE TIES ARE TO BE FUIINISHED TO THE CITY ENGINEER AT THE C014PLETION OF PROJECT BEFORE ACCEPTANCE IS GRANTED. I 12. AN ENQROICNIENT PERMIT SMALL 9E REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK DONE WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY. BEFORE ISSUANCE OF SAID PERMIT THE CONTRAC- TOR/'DEVELOPER MUST PROVIDE THE CITY ENGINEER WITH CERTIFICATE OF INSUR- W, REQUIRED "01AIG FOR PUBLIC 1WROVEMENTS. THE ENCROAC7i£NT PERMIT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE JAB SITE DURING THE TOTAL TIME FRAME OF PROJECT CONSTRUCTION WITH APPROVED SET IMPROVEMENT PLANS. I 13, IF ENCROAGIENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED TMOUGH THE DISTRICT NO, B OFFICE OF CALIRANS PLEASE MAKE REFERENCE TO THIS FACT IN THE GENERAL NOTES SECTION OF THE IMPROVEMENT PLANS. I OWNER: MR. DANIEL TSAI 8 SAM LEE 135 LIVE OAK. SUITE 202 ARCADIA, CAL 91WO 1NIS F:.i:'i ' '` p ",Cpf!PANY IAlt INSPE6i..., LEU'JtS1S LEGAL OtSCRIPTiGN: PARCEL 1: BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 8.9,810 N BLOCK 7 OF HEALD'S FIRST ADDITION TO ELSOKM PAGE 205, BOOK 4 PARCEL 2: BEING A PORTION OF BLOCKS 7 8 8 a OF HEALD'S FIRST ADDITION 70 ELSINORE, PAGE 205, BOOK 4 AS 9""Fll . . City o4 E111 -1. Builds, n^VI- p.0 GRADING ® / PLANFI(BSH 1 PAVING \ SCALE 11"= 20' BENCH MARK: 2" BRASS DISC STAMPED "G 3v7 1935 RESET 1985 ", N BASE OF FLAG POLE ENT N MEMORY OF HOWARD M. BLACK, CCMOR., POST 1508, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, MOMJM 130'± SOUTH OF MSSON TRAIL 50'± WEST OF RAILROAD CANYON ROAD, So. TOPOGRAPHIC SOURCE. FIELD SURVEY BY SUN SURVEY I23800 SUIRIYMEAD BLVD. STE. jM ORENO VALLEY, CALF, 52368 LIIVERSIFIEU ENGINEER64G 27570 COMMERCE CENTER DR. F 124 TEMECULA, CALIF. 92390 714) 676-5884 R.0'T F—'-4 k , ", City of Lake Elsinore Building Department December 18, 1990 AR832V5 APPENDIX A SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTING Schaefer Dixon Associates 1 I TT-1 11/27 12 12.5 1 116 1.0 Maximum 86 SM /GM 2 TT-1 I 11/27 Fill Test Field Moisture Dry Relative SM /GM Test TT.1 11/27 Depl6 Depth Density Content Density Compaction Soil No. Location Date feet) feet) pcf) percent) pcf) percent) Type 1 I TT-1 11/27 12 12.5 1 116 1.0 135 86 SM /GM 2 TT-1 I 11/27 10 10.5 118 9.2 135 87 SM /GM 3 TT.1 11/27 9 9S 111 9.8 135 82 SM /GM 4 TT-1 11/28 9 9.5 124 7.2 135 92 SM /GM 5 TT-1 11/28 7 7.5 125 7.6 135 92 SM /GM 6 TT-1 11/28 4 4.5 112 7.6 134 84 SM /GM 7 TT -1 11/28 4 4.5 116 6.7 134 87 SM /GM 8 TT -1 11/29 3 3.5 123 7.2 134 92 SM /GM 9 TT -1 11/30 1.5 2 134 11 134 100 SM /GM 10 TT -1 11/30 0 S 133 9.5 134 99 SM /GM 1 TT.2 11/29 5 5.5 121 5.7 135 90 M /GM 2 TT.2 11/29 4 4.5 113 4.6 135 84 SM /GM 3 TT-2 11/29 2 2.5 117 6.7 135 87 I SM /GM ' 4 TT-2 11/29 1 1.5 117 7.3 135 87 SM /GM 5 TT-2 11/30 4 4.5 121 7.4 135 89 SM /GM 6 TT -2 11/30 4S 5 123 6.7 135 91 SM /GM 7 TT.2 11/30 3 3.5 131 9.0 135 97 SM /GM 8 TT-2 11/30 1 1.5 122 123 135 90 SM /GM 1 PITT-3 12/03 10.5 11 123 10.1 134 92 SM /GM 2 PI/T17-3 12/03 5.5 6 131 10.2 134 98 SM /GM 3 PITT -3 12/03 3.5 4 129 8.1 134 96 SM /GM 4 PI/TI' -3 12/03 1.5 2 124 6.7 134 93 SM /GM 5 PIPIT -3 12/04 0 S 125 9.1 134 93 SM /GM 1 DL -1 12/04 5 1 122T 7.0 135 91 SM /GM City of Lake Elsinore Building Department December 18, 1990 AR832V5 APPENDIX B RESULTS OF MOISTURE DENISTY TESTING MOISTURE - DENSITY RELATIONSHIP Imported Fill) Maximum Density= 133.6 pcf Optimum Moisture= 7.9% MOISTURE - DENSITY RELATIONSHIP Stockp,'!,? Contaminated) Maximum Density= 135.6 pcf Optimum Moisture= 7.6 % Associates Schaefer Dixon y 11- i- t"r :6:'• < by i 6ig:nec's. Gce'on sts & E9wonnlental Speoal,,as 19-10 Orange Tree I.anr Fax 114 1921704 Nerllanrl:: ra',r, , 9.373 714 7932691 Associates Schaefer Dixon AR832V5 December 18, 1990 City of Lake Elsinore Building Department 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92330 Attention: Mr. Kevin Shear Subject: Observation and Test Results Excavation backfill Former ARCO Northwest Corner Casino Drive and San Jacinto River Road Lake Elsinore, California Gentlemen: This is to report the results of observation and soil compaction testing performed on the subject site. Attached as Appendix A are the results of compaction tests performed on the backfill for the excavations resulting from remediation of soil as a result of previous underground gasoline storage tanks and product lines. The excavations were labeled TT -1, TT-2, PI TT-3, and D1,1 as shown on Figure 1. TT-1 was backfilled with soil removed during remedial action attempts from the total depth of 30 feet below existing grade (BEG) to 5 feet BEG. From 5 feet BEG to grade, soil was imported to the site and used as backfill material. As evaluated by field testing, soils contaminated with gasoline within the upper 12 feet were removed from PI TT-3. Subsequently, imported soil was used as backfill within PI TT-3. The soils used in the backfill consisted of silty fine to coarse sand with little silt or clay, and coarse to large gavels and cobbles. Periodic density tests and inspections were provided by a representative of Schaefer Dixon Associates, Inc. (SDA) to check the compaction for compliance with the City of Lake Elsinore, Building Department specifications. The presence of our field representative at the site was to provide continuous field observations of the contractor's work with regards to excavation backfilling and compaction. The opinions and recommendations presented hereafter are based on our tests and obser- vations of the compaction procedures used, and represent our engineering judgement as compliance with the job specifications. s1-, ,_ , I a,d I r City of Lake Elsinore Building Department December 18, 1990 AR832V5 Schaefer Dixon ssociates Field density tests were made to determine the degree of compaction and moisture content. Where tests or field observations indicated insufficient density, additional compaction with adjustment of the moisture content as required was performed. All field density tests are listed in the "Summary of Field Density Testing", Appendix A. The minimum acceptable degree of compaction was 80 percent of the maximum dry density below 5 feet from grade. The minimum acceptable degree of compaction was 90 percent of the maximum dry density in the upper 5 feet. The maximum density and optimum moisture content were determined by the ASTM 1557 Method for both the native soil used as backfill within TT-1 and the -Imported soil. The results of the maximum density testing are presented in Appendix B. Based on the density test results, on observations of the compaction procedures used in the field, and our experience, it is our opinion that the compaction was performed in accordance with the intent of the applicable portions of the job specifications and with SDA's recom- mendations. The opinions and recommendations presented hereafter are based on our tests and observations of the compaction procedures used, and represent our engineering judgement as compliance with the job specifications. We trust that the above information meets the project requirements. j Respectfully submitted, Tomas J arq ez Dean M.White, G.E. 2134 Environmental Ted ni aii- Associate /Manager of Engineering TJM /DMW:nau Addressee (2) ` Enclosures: Figure 1- Plar. View of Test Trenches Appendix A - Summary of Field Density Testing Appendix B - Results of Moisture Density Testing cc: ARCO Products Company Attention: Mr. Joe Tully i, County of Riverside Attention: Mr. Paul Mitchell Mr. Danny Lee rJt xW I 1 1 Schaefer DixonAssociates tea.,_ , • r I T Z— TAI i dTr rF TZGX w..dTE.- ti?•7PVU02 E.- -". G T 7 Y .. _ ''JO V ui VAC /.a i t2 id r .b rL S AC A"= sw F/1 A VXo Project No. Date J' Figure L. I