Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3064 Alberhill Ridge Updated Draft COA Report, Lake Elsinore 02-29-12 (11x17) Volume 1 of 3 (1) (1) LINSCOTT GREENSPAN engineers CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT(VOLUME 1 OF 3) ALBERHILL RIDGE VESTING TRACT MAP No. 35001 Lake Elsinore,California February 29, 2012 Prepared for: Castle&Cooke California, Inc 4113 Pearl Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 LLG Ref. 2-09-3064-1 Prepared by: Under the Supervision of Q��FESSIONq�F Zawwar Saiyed, P.E. Keil D. Maberry, P.E. Quo MaBER y Transportation Engineer III Principal � �°' (�,3 Linscott,Law& vo * Greenspan,Engineers * 1RAFE�G �\� 1580 Corporate Drive STgTE OF CPL1 Suite 122 Costa Mesa,CA 92626 714.641.1587 r 714.641.0139 r vmmIlgengineers.com TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 1 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions............................................................................................... 9 1.1 Study Area..................................................................................................................................... 2 8.0 Recommended Traffic Improvements (Conditions of Approval for All Ridge plus 1,191st DU of 2.0 Analysis Methodology and Impact Criteria..................................................................................... 3 Ranch Scenario).................................................................................................................................. 9 2.1 Highway Capacity Manual(HCM) Method of Analysis (Signalized Intersections)................. 3 8.1 Year 2017/1,19I st DU Alberhill Ranch&Phases 1 through 4 2.2 Highway Capacity Manual(HCM) Method of Analysis (Unsignalized Intersections)............. 3 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions............................................................................................... 9 2.3 Volume to Capacity(V/C) Method of Analysis (Roadway Segments) .................................... 3 8.2 Year 2020/1,191st DU Alberhill Ranch&Phases 1 through 10 2.4 Impact Criteria and Thresholds.................................................................................................... 3 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions............................................................................................... 9 8.3 Year 2022/1,191st DU Alberhill Ranch&Phases I through 14 3.0 Conditions Approval Analysis Scenarios ......................................................................................... 3 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions............................................................................................... 10 8.4 Year 2024/1,19Ist DU Alberhill Ranch&Phases 1 through 20 4.0 Project Traffic Characteristics........................................................................................................... 4 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions............................................................................................... 10 4.1 Project Traffic Generation Forecast............................................................................................. 4 4.2 Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment.............................................................................. 4 9.0 Conditions of Approval Traffic Impact Analysis (All Ridge plus 2661h DU of Ranch).............. 11 9.1 Year 2017/2661h DU Alberhill Ranch&Phases I through 4 5.0 Conditions of Approval Traffic Impact Analysis (All Ridge plus All Ranch)............................ 5 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions............................................................................................... 11 5.1 Year 2017/1,191"DU Alberhill Ranch &Phases 1 through 4 9.2 Year 2020/2661h DU Alberhill Ranch&Phases I through 10 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions.............................................................................................. 5 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions............................................................................................... 11 5.2 Year 2020/1,612th DU Alberhill Ranch(Buildout) &Phases I through 10 9.3 Year 2022/2661h DU Alberhill Ranch&Phases 1 through 14 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions.............................................................................................. 5 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions............................................................................................... 12 5.3 Year 2022/1,612th DU Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) &Phases I through 14 9.4 Year 2024/2661h DU Alberhill Ranch&Phases 1 through 20 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions.............................................................................................. 6 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions............................................................................................... 12 5.4 Year 2024/1,612th DU Alberhill Ranch(Buildout) &Phases I through 20 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions.............................................................................................. 6 10.0 Recommended Traffic Improvements (Conditions of Approval for All Ridge plus 266th DU of RanchScenario).................................................................................................................................. 12 6.0 Recommended Traffic Improvements (Conditions of Approval for All Ridge plus All Ranch 10.1 Year 2017/2661h DU Alberhill Ranch&Phases I through 4 Scenario).............................................................................................................................................. 6 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions............................................................................................... 12 6.1 Year 2017/1,191"DU Alberhill Ranch&Phases I through 4 10.2 Year 2020/266th DU Alberhill Ranch&Phases I through 10 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions.............................................................................................. 6 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions............................................................................................... 12 6.2 Year 2020/1,612th DU Alberhill Ranch(Buildout) &Phases I through 10 10.3 Year 2022/2661h DU Alberhill Ranch&Phases I through 14 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions.............................................................................................. 6 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions............................................................................................... 13 6.3 Year 2022/1,612th DU Alberhill Ranch(Buildout) &Phases I through 14 10.4 Year 2024/2661h DU Alberhill Ranch&Phases I through 20 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions.............................................................................................. 7 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions............................................................................................... 13 6.4 Year 2024/1,612th DU Alberhill Ranch(Buildout) &Phases I through 20 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions.............................................................................................. 7 11.0 Recommended Traffic Improvements Summary............................................................................. 14 7.0 Conditions of Approval Traffic Impact Analysis (All Ridge plus 1,191St DU of Ranch).......... 8 7.1 Year 2017/1,191st DU Alberhill Ranch &Phases I through 4 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions.............................................................................................. 8 7.2 Year 2020/1,191st DU Alberhill Ranch &Phases I through 10 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions.............................................................................................. 8 7.3 Year 2022/1,191st DU Alberhill Ranch &Phases I through 14 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions.............................................................................................. 9 7.4 Year 2024/1,191st DU Alberhill Ranch &Phases I through 20 LINSCOTT,LAw&GREENSPAN,engineers LLG Ref.2-09-3064-1 i Alberhill Ridge,Lake Elsinore N:\3000\2093064\2011-2012 Update\Report\3064 Table of Contents(11x17).doc LIST OF TABLES TABLE# 1 Project Development Summary 2 Project Traffic Generation Rates 3 Project Traffic Generation Forecast(By Phases)—Alberhill Ridge, Lake Elsinore 4 Project Traffic Generation Forecast(By Phases)—Alberhill Ranch,Lake Elsinore 5A Project Traffic Impact Matrix—Roadway Segments(All Ridge Plus All Ranch) 5B Project Traffic Impact Matrix—Roadway Segments(All Ridge Plus 1191st DU of Ranch) 5C Project Traffic Impact Matrix—Roadway Segments(All Ridge Plus 266th DU of Ranch) 6A Project Traffic Impact Matrix—Intersections(All Ridge Plus All Ranch) 6B Project Traffic Impact Matrix—Intersections(All Ridge Plus 1191 st DU of Ranch) 6C Project Traffic Impact Matrix—Intersections(All Ridge Plus 266th DU of Ranch) 6D Recommended Improvement Comparison Summary Table Attachment 1 —Link Volume Capacities and Level of Service for Riverside County Roadways LINSCOTT,LAW&GREENSPAN,engineers LLG Ref.2-09-3064-1 11 Alberhill Ridge,Lake Elsinore N:A3000A2093064\2011-2012 UpdateAReport\3064 List of Tables(I lxl7).doc LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE# FIGURE# Volume I Year 2017 All Ridge Plus 1191st DU of Ranch PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 1 Vicinity Map 12-A Year 2020 All Ridge Plus 1191"DU of Ranch Daily Traffic Volumes 2 Proposed Site Plan 12-B Year 2020 All Ridge Plus 1191st DU of Ranch AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 3 Existing Roadway Conditions and Intersection Controls 12-C Year 2020 All Ridge Plus 1191St DU of Ranch PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 4-A Year 2017/2020/2022/2024 Recommended Improvements(All Ridge Plus All Ranch) 13-A Year 2022 All Ridge Plus 1191St DU of Ranch Daily Traffic Volumes 4-13 Year 2017/2020/2022/2024 Recommended Improvements(All Ridge Plus 1191St DU of Ranch) 13-B Year 2022 All Ridge Plus 1191St DU of Ranch AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 4-C Year 2017/2020/2022/2024 Recommended Improvements(All Ridge Plus 266th DU of Ranch) 13-C Year 2022 All Ridge Plus 1191st DU of Ranch PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 4-D Recommended Improvements (Intersections 1-10) 14-A Year 2024 All Ridge Plus 1191"DU of Ranch Daily Traffic Volumes 4-E Recommended Improvements (Intersections 11-20) 14-B Year 2024 All Ridge Plus 1191st DU of Ranch AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Volume 2 14-C Year 2024 All Ridge Plus 1191St DU of Ranch PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 5-A Year 2011 Existing(with Alberhill Ranch 266th DU)Daily Traffic Volumes 15-A Year 2017 All Ridge Plus 266th DU of Ranch Daily Traffic Volumes 5-13 Year 2011 Existing(with Alberhill Ranch 266th DU)AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 15-B Year 2017 All Ridge Plus 266th DU of Ranch AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 5-C Year 2011 Existing(with Alberhill Ranch 266th DU)PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 15-C Year 2017 All Ridge Plus 266th DU of Ranch PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 6-A Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-20)Project Only Daily Traffic Volumes 16-A Year 2020 All Ridge Plus 266th DU of Ranch Daily Traffic Volumes 6-13 Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-20)Project Only AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 16-B Year 2020 All Ridge Plus 266th DU of Ranch AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 6-C Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-20)Project Only PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 16-C Year 2020 All Ridge Plus 266th DU of Ranch PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 7-A Year 2017 All Ridge plus All Ranch Daily Traffic Volumes 17-A Year 2022 All Ridge Plus 266th DU of Ranch Daily Traffic Volumes 7-13 Year 2017 All Ridge plus All Ranch AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 17-B Year 2022 All Ridge Plus 266th DU of Ranch AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 7-C Year 2017 All Ridge plus All Ranch PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 17-C Year 2022 All Ridge Plus 266th DU of Ranch PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 8-A Year 2020 All Ridge plus All Ranch Daily Traffic Volumes 18-A Year 2024 All Ridge Plus 266th DU of Ranch Daily Traffic Volumes 8-13 Year 2020 All Ridge Plus All Ranch AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 18-B Year 2024 All Ridge Plus 266th DU of Ranch AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 8-C Year 2020 All Ridge Plus All Ranch PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 18-C Year 2024 All Ridge Plus 266th DU of Ranch PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 9-A Year 2022 All Ridge Plus All Ranch Daily Traffic Volumes 9-13 Year 2022 All Ridge Plus All Ranch AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 9-C Year 2022 All Ridge Plus All Ranch PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 10-A Year 2024 All Ridge Plus All Ranch Daily Traffic Volumes 10-13 Year 2024 All Ridge Plus All Ranch AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 10-C Year 2024 All Ridge Plus All Ranch PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 11-A Year 2017 All Ridge Plus 1191St DU of Ranch Daily Traffic Volumes 11-B Year 2017 All Ridge Plus 1191st DU of Ranch AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes LINSCOTT,LAW&GREENSPAN,engineers LLG Ref.2-09-3064-1 111 Alberhill Ridge,Lake Elsinore N:A3000\2093064\2011-2012 UpdateAReport\3064 List of Figures(11 x17).doc CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT (VOLUME 1) ALBERHILL RIDGE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 35001 Lake Elsinore, California February 29, 2012 TABLE 1 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION Proposed Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit the following Conditions of Approval Project Description/Land Use Development Size Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed Vested Tentative Tract Map 35001 (VTTM No. 35001) evaluated Alberhill Ranch VTTM35001 through the Alberhill Ranch Addendum IV. This traffic and circulation analysis for the proposed Alberhill Year 2017 Phase 1 —Retail/Multi-Family Residential 170,000 SF/40 DU Ridge development (VTTM No. 35001) determines the timing of traffic improvements along impacted Phase 1 -Multi-Family Residential 00 DU roadway segments and at impacted intersections within the study area based on four (4) development Phase 2-Single Family Residential(Built) 65 DU phases of Alberhill Ridge combined with the three (3)potential development scenarios for Alberhill Ranch, • Phase 3 -Single Family Residential 59 DU listed as follows: Phase 4-Single Family Residential 41 DU • Buildout of Alberhill Ridge plus Buildout of Alberhill Ranch (1,612 DU) Year 2020 • Buildout of Alberhill Ridge plus 1,191 st DU of Alberhill Ranch Phase 5 -Single Family Residential 85 DU • Buildout of Alberhill Ridge plus 266th DU of Alberhill Ranch(existing) Phase 6-Single Family Residential 72 DU • Phase 7-Single Family Residential 77 DU The proposed VTTM No. 35001 consists of the following development program: Phase 8 -Public Park 6 Acres ➢ 1,036 Single-Family Dwelling Units Phase 9-Single Family Residential 57 DU ➢ 386 Multi-Family Dwelling Units, Phase 10-Single Family Residential 68 DU ➢ 252,500 Square Feet of Commercial/Retail Year 2022 ➢ 6-Acre Public Park Phase 11 -Single Family Residential 95 DU • Phase 12-Single Family Residential 90 DU The proposed VTTM No. 35001 is consistent with the development program and zoning contained in the Phase 13 -Single Family Residential 54 DU Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 project. Phase 14-Single Family Residential 58 DU Year 2024 Figure I presents a vicinity map depicting a general outline of the proposed VTTM No. 35001 area, the ■ Phase 15 -Single Family Residential 58 DU Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 project area and the current Alberhill Ranch development ■ Phase 16-Single Family Residential 40 DU ■ area. As shown in Figure 1, the proposed VTTM No. 35001 project area, which consists of 400 acres, is Phase 17-Single Family Residential(Built) 46 DU ■ Phase 18 -Single Family Residential 45 DU significantly less than the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 project area of 1,000 acres. ■ Phase 19-Single Family Residential 26 DU Figure 2 presents VTTM No. 35001, which includes 13 Planning Areas and depicts the 20 development 0 Phase 20-Retail/Multi-Family Residential 82,500 SF/16 DU phases, consisting of a mix of detached and attached residential, commercial, and parks. As a result, this report focuses to detailing and summarizing the required traffic mitigation improvements associated with Single Family Residence Total: 1,036 DU four (4) development phasing scenarios for Alberhill Ridge and Alberhill Ranch along nineteen (19) key Multi-Family Residence Total. 386 DU study roadway segments and at twenty (20) key study intersections, which can be utilized as the basis for Public Park: 6 Acres setting Conditions of Approval for the proposed Alberhill Ridge development. Commercial/Retail Total: 252,500 SF Notes: SF=Square Feet&DU=Dwelling Units Table 1 presents the Project development program summary. As presented in Table 1, the development program occurs within twenty(20) development phases to be completed by Year 2024. LINSCOTT,LAW&GREENSPAN,engineers LLG Ref.2-09-3064-1 1 Alberhill Ridge,Lake Elsinore N:\3000\2093064\2011-2012 Update\Report\3064 Alberhill Ridge Updated Draft COA Report,Lake Elsinore 02-29-12(l lxl7).doc 1.1 Study Area 11. Lake Street/Grand Avenue at Lakeshore Drive Nineteen (19) key area study roadway segments were selected for evaluation in this report that provide 12. Alberhill Ridge/Alberhill Ranch Rd at Nichols Road local and regional access to the study area and are listed as follows: 13. Terra Cotta Road at Nichols Road A. Lake Street between I-15 Southbound Ramps & Temescal Canyon Road 14. Pierce Street at Nichols Road B. Lake Street between Temescal Canyon Road&Alberhill Ridge Road 15. Collier Avenue at Nichols Road C. Lake Street between Alberhill Ridge Road&A Street 16. I-15 Southbound Ramps at Nichols Road D. Lake Street between A Street &B Street 17. I-15 Northbound Ramps at Nichols Road E. Lake Street between B Street& C Street 18. Alberhill Ridge Road at A Street F. Lake Street between C Street&Nichols Road 19. Alberhill Ridge Road at B Street G. Lake Street between Nichols Road&Alberhill Ranch Road 20. Alberhill Ridge Road at C Street H. Lake Street between Alberhill Ranch Road&Mountain Street I. Nichols Road between Lake Street&Alberhill Ridge Road/Alberhill Ranch Road J. Nichols Road between Alberhill Ridge Road/Alberhill Ranch Road& Terra Cotta Road K. Nichols Road between Terra Cotta Road&Pierce Street L. Nichols Road between Pierce Street& Collier Road M. Alberhill Ridge Road between Lake Street& A Street N. A Street between Lake Street &Alberhill Ridge Road O. B Street between Lake Street&Alberhill Ridge Road P. C Street between Lake Street&Alberhill Ridge Road Q. Alberhill Ridge Road between A Street&B Street R. Alberhill Ridge Road between B Street& C Street S. Alberhill Ridge Road between C Street&Nichols Road Twenty (20) key area study intersections (existing and future) were designated for evaluation. The Twenty (20) key area intersections selected for evaluation in this report provide local and regional access to the study area and are listed as follows: 1. Lake Street at I-15 Northbound Ramps 2. Lake Street at I-15 Southbound Ramps 3. Lake Street at Temescal Canyon Road 4. Lake Street at Alberhill Ridge Road 5. Lake Street at A Street 6. Lake Street at B Street 7. Lake Street at C Street 8. Lake Street at Nichols Road 9. Lake Street at Alberhill Ranch Road 10. Lake Street at Mountain Street LINSCOTT,LAW&GREENSPAN,engineers LLG Ref.2-09-3064-1 2 Alberhill Ridge,Lake Elsinore N:\3000\2093064\2011-2012 Update\Report\3064 Alberhill Ridge Updated Draft COA Report,Lake Elsinore 02-29-12(l lxl7).doc 2.0 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY AND IMPACT CRITERIA ■ Caused an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e. result in a substantial increase in either the number of 2.1 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Method of Analysis (Signalized Intersections) vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections). In conformance with the City of Lake Elsinore and Riverside County requirements, existing AM and PM peak hour operating conditions for the key study intersections were evaluated using the Highway Capacity Exceeds, either individually or cumulative, a level of service standard established for a Manual (HCM) 2000 Methodology for signalized intersections. Based on the HCM operations method of roadway or intersection by the applicable jurisdiction. analysis, level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of control delay, which is a The City of Lake Elsinore considers LOS D to be the minimum acceptable LOS for all intersections and measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time. The delay experienced by LOS C for all roadway segments. a motorist is made up of a number of factors that relate to control, geometries, traffic, and incidents. Total delay is the difference between the travel time actually experienced and the reference travel time that In addition, the County of Riverside considers LOS C along all County maintained roads and conventional would result during ideal conditions: in the absence of traffic control, in the absence of geometric delay, in state highways. As an exception, LOS "D" may be allowed in Community Development areas, only at the absence of any incidents, and when there are no other vehicles on the road. intersections of any combination of Secondary Highways, Major Highways, Urban, Expressways, conventional state highways or freeway ramp intersections. LOS "E" may be allowed in designated In Chapter 16 of the HCM, only the portion of total delay attributed to the control facility (study community centers to the extent that it would support transit-oriented development and walk able intersection) is quantified. This delay is called control delay. Control delay includes initial deceleration communities. delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. In contrast, in previous versions of the HCM (1994 and earlier), delay included only stopped delay. Specifically, LOS criteria for traffic signals are stated in terms of the average control delay per vehicle. 3.0 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ANALYSES (ALL RIDGE PLUS ALL RANCH SCENARIO) The following analyses are those for which Delay/LOS and V/C calculations have been performed at the 2.2 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Method of Analysis (Unsignalized Intersections) key twenty (20) study intersections and Nineteen (19) key study roadway segments for the existing and The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 Methodology for unsignalized intersections was utilized in future traffic conditions for the Buildout of Alberhill Ridge plus Buildout of Alberhill Ridge scenario the analysis of stop-controlled intersections. For all-way stop-controlled intersections, this methodology (Herein referred to as "All Ridge plus All Ranch"): estimates the average control delay for each of the subject movements and determines the level of service for each movement. The overall average control delay measured in seconds per vehicle, and level of 1. Year 2011 Existing (with Alberhill Ranch 266th DU), service is then calculated for the entire intersection. The HCM control delay value translates to a Level of 2. Year 2017 with Alberhill Ranch(1,191st DU) & Alberhill Ridge (Phases 1-4), Service (LOS) estimate, which is a relative measure of the intersection performance. 3. Year 2020 with Alberhill Ranch Buildout (1,612th DU) &Alberhill Ridge (Phases 1-10), 4. Year 2022 with Alberhill Ranch Buildout (1,612th DU) &Alberhill Ridge (Phases 1-14), For one-way and two-way stop-controlled (minor street stop-controlled) intersections, this methodology 5. Year 2024 with Alberhill Ranch Buildout (1,612th DU) &Alberhill Ridge (Phases 1-20), estimates the worst side street delay, measured in seconds per vehicle and determines the level of service for that approach. The HCM delay value translates to a Level of Service (LOS) estimate, which is a relative 6. Above scenarios with mitigation, if necessary. measure of the intersection performance. It should be noted that the Alberhill Ranch development milestones of 464th DU, 650th DU, and 950th DU 2.3 Volume to Capacity (V/C) Method of Analysis (Roadway Segments) reflect currently adopted Conditions of Approval for the development while the Alberhill Ranch 1,6121h DU reflects the buildout of Alberhill Ranch and the 266 1hDU reflects the current development condition In conformance with the City of Lake Elsinore and Riverside County requirements criteria, existing daily for the Alberhill Ranch Project at the time of the traffic counts were conducted for this analysis. operating conditions for the key existing study roadway links have been investigated according to the volume-to-capacity (V/C) of each link. The V/C relationship is used to estimate the LOS of the roadway Attachment 1 presents the Link Volume Capacities and Level of Service for Riverside County Roadways. segment with the volume based on the 24-hour traffic count data and the existing capacity based on the City's classification of each roadway. Figure 3 shows the Existing Roadway Conditions and Intersection Controls. Figure 4A shows the planned and recommended improvements for Near-Term traffic conditions (Year 2017 — Year 2024) for the All 2.4 Impact Criteria and Thresholds Ridge plus All Ranch scenario, which covers the implementation phasing of the four (4) development For purposes of this Conditions Approval Analysis, the following traffic impacts would be considered phases for Alberhill Ridge. It should be noted that the improvements required by the current Alberhill significant if the proposed Project: Ranch Conditions of Approval (shown in purple) are included as background improvements according to the Alberhill Ranch development timeline. LINSCOTT,LAW&GREENSPAN,engineers LLG Ref.2-09-3064-1 3 Alberhill Ridge,Lake Elsinore N:\3000\2093064\2011-2012 Update\Report\3064 Alberhill Ridge Updated Draft COA Report,Lake Elsinore 02-29-12(l lxl7).doc 4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 4.2 Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment 4.1 Project Traffic Generation Forecast Project traffic volumes, both entering and exiting the site, have been distributed and assigned to the adjacent street system based on the following considerations: Traffic generation is expressed in vehicle trip ends, defined as one-way vehicular movements, either entering or exiting the generating land use. Generation equations and/or rates used in the traffic forecasting the site's proximity to major traffic carriers (i.e. SR-15 Freeway, etc.), procedure are based on both the rates from the approved Alberhill Ranch Traffic Study and the equations expected localized traffic flow patterns based on adjacent street channelization and presence of and/or rates found in the Eighth Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation traffic signals, Engineers (ITE) [Washington D.C., 2003/2008]. Table 2 summarizes the ITE trip generation rates used in the traffic-carrying capacity and travel speed available on roadways serving the Project site, forecasting the vehicular trips generated by the development of the proposed Project. existing intersection traffic volumes, TABLE 2 ingress/egress availability at the Project site, and PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION RATES information obtained from the Murdock Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan TIA Report, Lake Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Elsinore,prepared by Robert Kahn, John Kain&Associates, Inc., dated March 13, 1992. Land Use/Description 2-Way Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total The Project distribution pattern for each of the four(4) Alberhill Ridge development Phases is contained in Trip Generation Factors': Appendix B of the Appendices in Volume 3. • 210: Single Family Detached Housing(TE/DU) 9.57 0.19 0.56 0.75 0.64 0.37 1.01 The Year 2011 existing Daily, AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the twenty (20) key study • 220:Apartments(TE/DU) 6.65 0.10 0.41 0.51 0.40 0.22 0.62 intersections and nineteen (19) key study roadway segments are illustrated in Figures 5A, 5B, & 5C, • 820: Shopping Center(TE/TSF)2(82,500 SF) 45.66 0.75 0.32 1.07 1.74 1.96 3.70 respectively. These existing traffic volumes reflect the 266th DU of Ranch condition. • 820: Shopping Center(TE/TSF)3(170,000 SF) 1 56.40 1 0.76 1 0.48 1 1.24 1 2.62 1 2.72 1 5.34 The anticipated Daily, AM and PM peak hour Project traffic only volumes at the twenty (20) key study Table 3 summarizes the trip generation potential of Alberhill Ridge for the different Phases. As shown in intersections and nineteen (19) key study roadway segments are illustrated in Figures 6A, 6B, & 6C, the lower portion of Table 3, Alberhill Ridge, at buildout (Phases 1 - 20) is expected to generate 26,365 respectively, based on the traffic generation in Table 3 and the Project distribution patterns in Appendix B. daily trips (one half arriving, one half departing), with 1,278 trips (441 inbound, 837 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 2,505 trips (1,411 inbound, 1,094 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour on a The resulting traffic volumes based on the above-mentioned four (4) development phases for Alberhill "typical" weekday. It should be noted that based on the proximity of the proposed retail land use (170,000 Ridge combined with Buildout of Alberhill Ranch (All Ridge plus All Ranch) during the Daily, AM and SF shopping center) in Planning Area 3 of Phase 1 relative to the proposed residential development in PM peak hour at the twenty (20) key study intersections and nineteen (19) key roadway segments are Alberhill Ridge and Alberhill Ranch, it was assumed that 75% of the retail trips will be internal capture illustrated in Figures 7A through IOC. It should be noted that consistent with the approved Alberhill ranch trips within Alberhill Ridge (60%: 15%per Phase) and Alberhill Ranch (15%). TIA, in order to accurately portray future traffic conditions with the connection of Nichols Road, which will be completed in December 2011, existing peak hour and daily traffic volumes were manually re-routed Table 4 summarizes the trip generation potential of Alberhill Ranch for the respective dwelling units. As from Lake Street to Nichols Road based on current traffic volume data on Lake Street at Temescal Canyon shown in the lower portion of Table 4, Alberhill Ranch, at buildout (1st DU - 1,618th DU) is expected to Road and the I-15 Interchange. generate 15,493 daily trips (one half arriving, one half departing), with 1,507 trips (487 inbound, 1,020 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 1,618 trips (1,007 inbound, 611 outbound) produced in the The resulting traffic volumes based on the above-mentioned four (4) development phases for Alberhill PM peak hour on a"typical"weekday. Ridge combined with the 1,191 st DU of Alberhill Ranch (All Ridge plus 1,191 st DU of Ranch) during the Daily, AM and PM peak hour at the twenty (20) key study intersections and nineteen (19) key roadway segments are illustrated in Figures 11A through 14C. The resulting traffic volumes based on the above-mentioned four (4) development phases for Alberhill Source:Trip Generation,8th Edition,Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE), Washington,D.0(2008).Average rates used. Ridge combined with the 266th DU of Alberhill Ranch (All Ridge plus 266th DU of Ranch) during the 2 The trip generation rates for the proposed 82,500 SF in Planning Area lA are based on the trip rates from the equation for a 350,000 commercial center in the approved Alberhill Ranh Amendment No.l Traffic Study. Daily, AM and PM peak hour at the twenty (20) key study intersections and nineteen (19) key roadway 3 The trip generation rates for the proposed project's retail square-footage of 170,000 SF in Planning Area 3 are based on the following shopping center segments are illustrated in Figures 15A through 18C. Figures SA through 18C are presented separately in equations: Daily:LN(T)=0.65LN(X)+5.83 Volume 2 of the Report. ■ AM Peak Hour:LN(T)=0.59LN(X)+2.32,[61%Enter/39%Exit] PM Peak Hour:LN(T)=0.67LN(X)+3.37.[49%Enter/51%Exitl LINSCOTT,LAW&GREENSPAN,engineers LLG Ref.2-09-3064-1 4 Alberhill Ridge,Lake Elsinore N:\3000\2093064\2011-2012 Update\Report\3064 Alberhill Ridge Updated Draft COA Report,Lake Elsinore 02-29-12(l lxl7).doc 5.0 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (ALL RIDGE PLUS ALL RANCH) 5.1 Year 201711,191st DU Alberhill Ranch & Phases 1 through 4 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions Table 5A summarizes the Volume, V/C and LOS for the nineteen (19) key study roadway segments for the Review of Column 2 of Table 6A indicates that one (1) of the twenty (20) key study intersections are All Ridge plus All Ranch scenario mentioned above and indicates which roadway segments are forecast to forecast to operate at an adverse level of service for Year 2017/1,191 st DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases I operate at adverse service levels based on the City of Lake Elsinore and Riverside County LOS criteria. In through 4 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions based on the HCM methodology and addition, Table 5A also shows the resultant LOS associated with the implementation of either one or two the City's LOS standards. The intersections, reported below, are forecast to operate at an unacceptable LOS potential improvements and shows the resultant LOS (in green) of the study roadway segment based on the during the peak hour indicated: associated intersection mitigation measures identified in Table 6A. It should be noted that improvements AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour for the roadway segments were only recommended for roadway segments that were forecast to operate at Key Intersection Delav(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS adverse LOS and had one or both adjacent intersections that required an additional through lane as a 2. Lake Street at I-15 Southbound Ramps -- -- 72.5 E mitigation measure. The first column(1) of V/C & LOS values in Table 5A presents a summary of Existing Year 2011/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch Daily traffic conditions. The second column (2) presents the Year As shown in Column 3 of Table 6A, the recommended mitigation improvements outlined in this report will 2017/1,191st DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases I through 4 of Alberhill Ridge Daily traffic conditions. improve the Year 2017/1,191st DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases I through 4 of Alberhill Ridge service The third column (3) presents the Year 2020/1,612th DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Phases I levels to acceptable LOS conditions. The recommended improvements for Year 2017 are shown in red on through 10 of Alberhill Ridge Daily traffic conditions. The fourth column (4) presents the Year Figure 4A. It should be noted these improvements have been carried over to the future years as part of the 2022/1,612th DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Phases I through 14 of Alberhill Ridge Daily traffic background condition. conditions. The fifth column (5) presents the Year 2024/1,612th DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Phases 1 through 20 of Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) Daily traffic conditions. Appendix C contains the Year 2017/1,191st DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases I through 4 of Alberhill traffic conditions Delay/LOS calculation worksheets for the key study intersections. Table 6A summarizes the vehicle Delay and LOS for the twenty (20) key study intersections for the All Ridge plus All Ranch scenario mentioned above. In addition, Table 6A also shows the resultant LOS 5.2 Year 202011,612th DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill Ridge associated with the recommended mitigation measures needed to bring the impacted intersections to Traffic Conditions acceptable LOS based on the City of Lake Elsinore and Riverside County LOS criteria. The first column Review of Column 4 of Table 6 indicates that two (2) of the twenty (20) key study intersections are (1) of HCM/LOS values in Table 6A presents a summary of Existing Year 2011/266th DU of Alberhill forecast to operate at adverse levels of service for Year 2020/1,612th DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Ranch AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions. The second column (2)presents the Year 2017/1,19Ist DU Phases I through 10 of Alberhill Ridge traffic conditions based on the HCM methodology and the City's of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 4 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions. LOS standards. The intersections, reported below, are forecast to operate at an unacceptable LOS during The third column (3) presents the Year 2017/1,191st DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases I through 4 of the peak hour indicated: Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions with mitigation. The fourth column (4) presents the Year 2020/1,612th DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill Ridge AM AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour and PM peak hour traffic conditions. The fifth column (5) presents the Year 2020/1,612th DU of Alberhill Key Intersection Delay(s/v) LOS Delay s/v LOS Ranch (Buildout) and Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions 6. Lake Street at B Street 53.0 F -- with mitigation. The sixth column(6)presents the Year 2022/1,612th DU of Alberhill Ranch(Buildout) and 15. Collier Avenue at Nichols Road -- -- 144.1 F Phases I through 14 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions. The seventh column (7) presents the Year 2022/1,6121h DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Phases 1 through 14 of Alberhill As shown in Column 5 of Table 6A, the recommended mitigation improvements outlined in this report will Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions with mitigation. The eighth column (8) presents the Year improve the Year 2020/1,612th DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill 2024/1,612" DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Phases 1 through 20 of Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) AM Ridge service levels to acceptable LOS conditions. The recommended improvements for Year 2020 are and PM peak hour traffic conditions. The ninth column (9) presents the Year 2024/1,612th DU of Alberhill shown in green on Figure 4A. It should be noted these improvements have been carried over to the future Ranch (Buildout) and Phases 1 through 20 of Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) AM and PM peak hour traffic years as part of the background condition. conditions with mitigation. Appendix C of the Appendices in Volume 3 contains the Year 2011/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch Existing traffic conditions Delay/LOS calculation worksheets for the key study Appendix C contains the Year 2020/1,612th DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Phases 1 through 10 of intersections. Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions Delay/LOS calculation worksheets for the key study intersections. It should be noted that the recommended improvements identified as mitigation for a specific horizon year, when needed, have been carried over to the future years as part of the background condition. LINSCOTT,LAW&GREENSPAN,engineers LLG Ref.2-09-3064-1 5 Alberhill Ridge,Lake Elsinore N:\3000\2093064\2011-2012 Update\Report\3064 Alberhill Ridge Updated Draft COA Report,Lake Elsinore 02-29-12(l lxl7).doc 5.3 Year 202211,612th DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Phases 1 through 14 of Alberhill Ridge Elsinore at the completion of the first 200 CofO's in the Alberhill Ridge project and every 100 CofO's Traffic Conditions thereafter until completion of the project in order to evaluate the existing traffic counts and traffic impacts Review of Column 6 of Table 6A indicates that all twenty (20) key study intersections are forecast to of the Alberhill Ridge development associated with the trigger to actually construct the recommended operate at acceptable levels of service for Year 2022/1,612th DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Phases improvements. Any identified traffic improvements in the periodic traffic studies shall be constructed 1 through 14 of Alberhill Ridge DU traffic conditions based on the HCM methodology and the City's LOS within 100 CofO's or 18 months of the acceptance of the Traffic Study by the City of Lake Elsinore standards. whichever occurs first. Appendix C contains the Year 2015/9501h DU Traffic Conditions Delay/LOS calculation worksheets for the 6.1 Year 201711,191st DU Alberhill Ranch & Phases 1 through 4 Alberhill Ridge Recommended key study intersections. Traffic Improvements The results of the Year 2017/1,191"DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 4 of Alberhill Ridge AM 5.4 Year 202411,612th DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Phases 1 through 20 (Buildout) of and PM peak hour traffic conditions level of service analysis indicate that the proposed Project will impact Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions one (1) key study intersection. The following improvements listed below have been identified to mitigate Review of Column 8 of Table 6A indicates that three (3) of the twenty (20) key study intersections are the traffic impacts at the intersections impacted by the Year 2017/1,191St DU of Alberhill Ranch and forecast to operate at adverse levels of service for Year 2024/1,6121h DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Phases 1 through 4 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions: Phases 1 through 20 of Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) traffic conditions based on the HCM methodology and A. Lake Street at I-15 Southbound Ramps: Widen and restripe the Southbound Off-Ramp (east- the City's LOS standards. These intersections, reported below, are forecast to operate at an unacceptable west direction) and Lake Street to provide an eastbound free-right turn lane. LOS during the peak hour indicated: B. Phases 1 throughprovements: Construct Alberhill Ridge Road to its full roadway width AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour (curb-to-curb) as a Divided Collector roadway (two lanes plus median) between Nichols Road Key Intersection Delay ON) LOS Delay(s/y) LOS and "C" Street and construct "C" Street to its full roadway width (curb-to-curb) as a Local 5. Lake Street at A Street 44.1 E -- -- Collector roadway (two lanes) between Lake Street and Alberhill Ridge Road. Construct the 9. Lake Street at Alberhill Ranch Road -- -- 58.8 E intersection of Alberhill Ridge Road and "C" Street as an all-way stop with one left turn lane 17. I-15 Northbound Ramps at Nichols Road -- -- 58.0 E and one shared through-right turn lane on all approaches, except the westbound approach, which does not exist in Phases 1 through 4. As shown in Column 9 of Table 6A, the recommended improvements outlined in this report will improve the Year 2024/1,612th DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Phases 1 through 20 of Alberhill Ridge 6.2 Year 202011,612th DU Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) & Phases 1 through 10 Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) service levels to acceptable LOS conditions. The recommended improvements for Year 2024 Recommended Traffic Improvements are shown in blue on Figure 4A. The results of the Year 2020/1,612th DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour& Daily traffic conditions level of service analysis indicate that the Appendix C contains the Year 2024/1,612th DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Phases 1 through 20 of proposed Project will impact two (2) key study intersections. The following improvements listed below Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) Traffic Conditions Delay/LOS calculation worksheets for the key study have been identified to mitigate the traffic impacts at the intersections and roadways impacted by the Year intersections. 2020/1,612th DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill Ridge traffic conditions. (These improvements are in addition to the improvements recommended under the Year 2017 6.0 RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS (CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR ALL RIDGE traffic conditions): PLUS ALL RANCH SCENARIO) C. Lake Street at B Street: Install a traffic signal and design for three-phase operation. Widen For those intersections where projected traffic volumes are expected to result in unacceptable operating and/or restripe the intersection to provide a southbound left turn lane. conditions, this report recommends traffic improvements that change the intersection traffic control and/or D. Collier Avenue at Nichols Road: Install a traffic signal and design for three-phase operation geometry to increase capacity. These capacity improvements involve traffic signal installation/modification with protected westbound left turn on Nichols Road. Widen and/or restripe the intersection to and/or roadway widening/restriping to reconfigure roadways (add lanes) to specific approaches of a key provide a westbound left turn lane. intersection. The identified improvements are the basis for understanding the projected roadway infrastructure requirements resulting in the recommended traffic improvements to be considered within the E. Phases 5 through 10 Improvements: Construct Alberhill Ridge Road to its full roadway width Conditions of Approval (COA) for the proposed project under this scenario. In addition, it is (curb-to-curb) as a Divided Collector roadway (two lanes plus median) between "C" Street and recommended that the Developer cause a Traffic Study to be prepared and submitted to the City of Lake "B" Street and construct "B" Street to its full roadway width (curb-to-curb) as a Divided LINSCOTT,LAW&GREENSPAN,engineers LLG Ref.2-09-3064-1 6 Alberhill Ridge,Lake Elsinore N:\3000\2093064\2011-2012 Update\Report\3064 Alberhill Ridge Updated Draft COA Report,Lake Elsinore 02-29-12(l lxl7).doc Collector roadway (two lanes plus median) between Lake Street and Alberhill Ridge Road. J. Phases 15 through 20 Improvements: Construct Alberhill Ridge Road to its full roadway width Construct the intersection of Alberhill Ridge Road and `B" Street as an all-way stop with one (curb-to-curb) as a Divided Collector roadway(two lanes plus median) between Lake Street and left turn lane and one shared through-right turn lane on all approaches, except the westbound "A" Street. approach, which does not exist in Phases 1 through 10. Construct the westbound approach with one left turn lane and one shared through-right turn lane at Alberhill Ridge Road and"C" Street. As stated in Section 3 above, Figure 4A graphically illustrates the traffic improvements recommended at the impacted study intersections for the Year 2017/2020/2022//2024 traffic conditions for the All Ridge 6.3 Year 202211,612th DU Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) & Phases 1 through 14 Alberhill Ridge Traffic plus All Ranch development scenario. Conditions The results of the Year 2022/1,612th DU Alberhill Ranch(Buildout) &Phases 1 through 14 Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour & Daily traffic conditions level of service analysis indicate that the proposed Project will not impact any of the twenty (20) key study intersections. Therefore, no traffic improvements are recommended, except the adjacent project-related improvements, as follows: F. Phases 11 through 14 Improvements: Construct Alberhill Ridge Road to its full roadway width (curb-to-curb) as a Divided Collector roadway (two lanes plus median) between "B" Street and "A" Street and construct "A" Street to its full roadway width (curb-to-curb) as a Local Collector roadway (two lanes) between Lake Street and Alberhill Ridge Road. Construct the intersection of Alberhill Ridge Road and"A" Street as an all-way stop with one left turn lane and one shared through-right turn lane on all approaches, except the westbound approach, which does not exist in Phases 1 through 14. Construct the westbound approach with one left turn lane and one shared through-right turn lane at Alberhill Ridge Road and"B" Street. 6.4 Year 202411,612th DU Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) & Phases 1 through 20 Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) Recommended Traffic Improvements The results of the Year 2024/1,612th DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Phases 1 through 20 of Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) AM and PM peak hour & Daily traffic conditions level of service analysis indicate that the proposed Project will impact three (3) key study intersections. The following improvements listed below have been identified to mitigate the traffic impacts at the intersections and roadways impacted by the Year 2024/1,612th DU of Alberhill Ranch (Buildout) and Phases 1 through 20 of Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) traffic conditions. (These improvements are in addition to the improvements recommended under the Year 2017 and Year 2020 traffic conditions): G. Lake Street at A Street: Stripe C Street to provide for separate westbound right turn and left turn lanes. Widen and/or restripe Lake Street at A Street to provide an exclusive southbound left turn lane. H. Lake Street at Alberhill Ranch Road: Widen and/or restripe Lake Street at Alberhill Ranch Road to provide a second northbound through lane one-quarter mile north and south of the intersection. Modify the traffic signal, accordingly. I. I-15 Northbound Ramps at Nichols Road: Widen and restripe Nichols Road at the 1-15 Northbound Ramps to provide an exclusive westbound right turn lane. Modify the traffic signal, accordingly. LINSCOTT,LAW&GREENSPAN,engineers LLG Ref.2-09-3064-1 7 Alberhill Ridge,Lake Elsinore N:\3000\2093064\2011-2012 Update\Report\3064 Alberhill Ridge Updated Draft COA Report,Lake Elsinore 02-29-12(l lxl7).doc 7.0 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (ALL RIDGE PLUS 1,191 ST DU 7.1 Year 201711,191st DU Alberhill Ranch & Phases 1 through 4 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions OF RANCH) Review of Column 2 of Table 6B indicates that one (1) of the twenty (20) key study intersections are forecast to operate at an adverse level of service for Year 2017/1,191St DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 Table SB summarizes the Volume, V/C and LOS for the nineteen (19) key study roadway segments for the throu h 4 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM eak hour traffic conditions based on the HCM methodolo and All Ridge plus 1,191St DU of Ranch scenario mentioned above and indicates which roadway segments are the Cgy's LOS standards. The intersections reported below, are forecast to operate at an unacceptable LOS forecast to operate at adverse service levels based on the City of Lake Elsinore and Riverside County LOS during the peak hour indicated: criteria. In addition, Table 5B also shows the resultant LOS associated with the implementation of either one or two potential improvements and shows the resultant LOS (in green) of the study roadway segment AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour based on the associated intersection mitigation measures identified in Table 6B. It should be noted that Key Intersection Delay(s/v) Los Delay(s/v) LOS improvements for the roadway segments were only recommended for roadway segments that were forecast 2. Lake Street at I-15 Southbound Ramps -- -- 72.5 E to operate at adverse LOS and had one or both adjacent intersections that required an additional through lane as a mitigation measure. The first column (1) of V/C & LOS values in Table 5B presents a summary As shown in Column 3 of Table 6B, the recommended mitigation improvements outlined in this report will of Existing Year 2011/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch Daily traffic conditions. The second column (2) improve the Year 2017/1,191" DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 4 of Alberhill Ridge service presents the Year 2017/1,191St DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 4 of Alberhill Ridge Daily levels to acceptable LOS conditions. The recommended improvements for Year 2017 are shown in red on traffic conditions. The third column(3)presents the Year 2020/1,1915Y DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 Figure 4B. It should be noted these improvements have been carried over to the future years as part of the through 10 of Alberhill Ridge Daily traffic conditions. The fourth column (4) presents the Year background condition. 2022/1,191St DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 14 of Alberhill Ridge Daily traffic conditions. The fifth column (5) presents the Year 2024/1,1915Y DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 20 of Appendix C contains the Year 2017/1,191" DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 4 of Alberhill Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) Daily traffic conditions. traffic conditions Delay/LOS calculation worksheets for the key study intersections. Table 6B summarizes the vehicle Delay and LOS for the twenty (20) key study intersections for the All 7.2 Year 202011,191st DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill Ridge Traffic Ridge plus 1,191st DU of Ranch scenario mentioned above. In addition, Table 6B also shows the resultant Conditions LOS associated with the recommended mitigation measures needed to bring the impacted intersections to Review of Column 4 of Table 6B indicates that three (3) of the twenty (20) key study intersections are acceptable LOS based on the City of Lake Elsinore and Riverside County LOS criteria. The first column forecast to operate at adverse levels of service for Year 2020/1,191St DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 (1) of HCM/LOS values in Table 6B presents a summary of Existing Year 2011/266th DU of Alberhill through 10 of Alberhill Ridge traffic conditions based on the HCM methodology and the City's LOS Ranch AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions. The second column (2)presents the Year 2017/1,191st DU standards. The intersections, reported below, are forecast to operate at an unacceptable LOS during the of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 4 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions. peak hour indicated: The third column (3) presents the Year 2017/1,191st DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 4 of AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions with mitigation. The fourth column (4) presents the Year 2020/1,191st DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak Key Intersection Delay(s/v) Los Delay s/v Los hour traffic conditions. The fifth column (5) presents the Year 2020/1,191st DU of Alberhill Ranch and 3. Lake Street at Temescal Canyon Road -- -- 59.3 E Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions with mitigation. The sixth 6. Lake Street at B Street 67.0 F 72.0 F column (6) presents the Year 2022/1,191 st DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 14 of Alberhill 15. Collier Avenue at Nichols Road -- -- 35.7 E Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions. The seventh column(7)presents the Year 2022/1,191st DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 14 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions As shown in Column 5 of Table 6B, the recommended mitigation improvements outlined in this report will with mitigation. The eighth column (8)presents the Year 2024/1,1915Y DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 improve the Year 2020/1,191st DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill Ridge service through 20 of Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions. The ninth column (9) levels to acceptable LOS conditions. The recommended improvements for Year 2020 are shown in green presents the Year 2024/1,191st DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 20 of Alberhill Ridge on Figure 4B. It should be noted these improvements have been carried over to the future years as part of (Buildout) AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions with mitigation. Appendix C of the Appendices in the background condition. Volume 3 contains the Year 2011/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch Existing traffic conditions Delay/LOS calculation worksheets for the key study intersections. Appendix D of the Appendices in Volume 3 contains the Year 2020/1,1915t DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions Delay/LOS calculation worksheets for the key It should be noted that the recommended improvements identified as mitigation for a specific horizon year, study intersections. when needed, have been carried over to the future years as part of the background condition. LINSCOTT,LAW&GREENSPAN,engineers LLG Ref.2-09-3064-1 8 Alberhill Ridge,Lake Elsinore N:\3000\2093064\2011-2012 Update\Report\3064 Alberhill Ridge Updated Draft COA Report,Lake Elsinore 02-29-12(l lxl7).doc 7.3 Year 202211,191st DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 14 of Alberhill Ridge Traffic $,0 RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS (CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR ALL RIDGE Conditions PLUS 11191ST DU OF RANCH SCENARIO) Review of Column 6 of Table 6B indicates that two (2) of the twenty (20) key study intersections are forecast to operate at adverse levels of service for Year 2022/1,1915t DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 For those intersections where projected traffic volumes are expected to result in unacceptable operating through 14 of Alberhill Ridge DU traffic conditions based on the HCM methodology and the City's LOS conditions, this report recommends traffic improvements that change the intersection traffic control and/or standards. The intersections, reported below, are forecast to operate at an unacceptable LOS during the geometry to increase capacity. These capacity improvements involve traffic signal installation/modification peak hour indicated: and/or roadway widening/restriping to reconfigure roadways (add lanes) to specific approaches of a key intersection. The identified improvements are the basis for understanding the projected roadway AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour infrastructure requirements resulting in the recommended traffic improvements to be considered within the Key Intersection Delay ON) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Conditions of Approval (COA) for the proposed project under this scenario. In addition, it is 4. Lake Street at Alberhill Ridge Road 43.0 E -- -- recommended that the Developer cause a Traffic Study to be prepared and submitted to the City of Lake 6. Lake Street at A Street 37.2 E __ __ Elsinore at the completion of the first 200 CofO's in the Alberhill Ridge project and every 100 CofO's thereafter until completion of the project in order to evaluate the existing traffic counts and traffic impacts Appendix D contains the Year 2022/1,1915Y DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 14 of Alberhill of the Alberhill Ridge development associated with the trigger to actually construct the recommended Ridge Traffic Conditions Delay/LOS calculation worksheets for the key study intersections. improvements. Any identified traffic improvements in the periodic traffic studies shall be constructed within 100 CofO's or 18 months of the acceptance of the Traffic Study by the City of Lake Elsinore 7.4 Year 202411,191st DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 20 (Buildout) of Alberhill Ridge whichever occurs first. Traffic Conditions Review of Column 8 of Table 6B indicates that five (5) of the twenty (20) key study intersections are 8.1 Year 201711,191st DU Alberhill Ranch & Phases 1 through 4 Alberhill Ridge Recommended forecast to operate at adverse levels of service for Year 2024/1,191st DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 Traffic Improvements through 20 of Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) traffic conditions based on the HCM methodology and the City's The results of the Year 2017/1,191"DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 4 of Alberhill Ridge AM LOS standards. These intersections, reported below, are forecast to operate at an unacceptable LOS during and PM peak hour traffic conditions level of service analysis indicate that the proposed Project will impact the peak hour indicated: one (1) key study intersection. The following improvements listed below have been identified to mitigate the traffic impacts at the intersections impacted by the Year 2017/1,191st DU of Alberhill Ranch and AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Phases 1 through 4 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions: Key Intersection Delay 6/0 LOS Delay(s/v) LOS 4. Lake Street at Alberhill Ridge Road 84.7 F K. Lake Street at I-15 Southbound Ramps: Widen and restripe the Southbound Off-Ramp (east- -- -- west direction) and Lake Street to provide an eastbound free-right turn lane. 5. Lake Street at A Street 49.3 E 35.0 E 6. Lake Street at B Street -- -- 67.9 E L. Phases 1 through 4 Improvements: Construct Alberhill Ridge Road to its full roadway width (curb-to-curb) as a Divided Collector roadway (two lanes plus median) between Nichols Road 7. Lake Street at C Street 35.5 E -- -- and "C" Street and construct "C" Street to its full roadway width (curb-to-curb) as a Local 9. Lake Street at Alberhill Ranch Road -- -- 58.0 E Collector roadway (two lanes) between Lake Street and Alberhill Ridge Road. Construct the intersection of Alberhill Ridge Road and "C" Street as an all-way stop with one left turn lane As shown in Column 9 of Table 6B, the recommended improvements outlined in this report will improve and one shared through-right turn lane on all approaches,roaches except the westbound approach, the Year 2024/1,191 st DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 20 of Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) pp ' service levels to acceptable LOS conditions. The recommended improvements for Year 2024 are shown in which does not exist in Phases 1 through 4. blue on Figure 4B. 8.2 Year 202011,191st DU Alberhill Ranch & Phases 1 through 10 Alberhill Ridge Recommended Appendix D contains the Year 2024/1,191st DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 20 of Alberhill Traffic Improvements Ridge (Buildout) Traffic Conditions Delay/LOS calculation worksheets for the key study intersections. The results of the Year 2020/1,191st DU Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour & Daily traffic conditions level of service analysis indicate that the proposed Project will impact three (3) key study intersections. The following improvements listed below have been identified to mitigate the traffic impacts at the intersections and roadways impacted by the Year LINSCOTT,LAW&GREENSPAN,engineers LLG Ref.2-09-3064-1 9 Alberhill Ridge,Lake Elsinore N:\3000\2093064\2011-2012 Update\Report\3064 Alberhill Ridge Updated Draft COA Report,Lake Elsinore 02-29-12(l lxl7).doc 2020/1,191st DU Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill Ridge traffic conditions. (These through-right turn lane on all approaches, except the westbound approach, which does not exist improvements are in addition to the improvements recommended under the Year 2017 traffic conditions): in Phases 1 through 14. Construct the westbound approach with one left turn lane and one M. Lake Street at Temescal Canyon Road Widen and restripe Lake Street at Alberhill Ranch Road shared through-right turn lane at Alberhill Ridge Road and`B" Street. to provide a second southbound through lane one-quarter mile south of the intersection. Modify 8.4 Year 2024/1,191st DU Alberhill Ranch & Phases 1 through 20 Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) the traffic signal, accordingly Recommended Traffic Improvements N. Lake Street between 1-15 SB Ramps and Temescal Canyon Road: Widen Lake Street between I- The results of the Year 2024/1,191st DU Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 20 of Alberhill Ridge 15 SB Ramps and Temescal Canyon Road to provide a second southbound travel lane. (Buildout) AM and PM peak hour & Daily traffic conditions level of service analysis indicate that the proposed Project will impact five (5) key study intersections. The following improvements listed below O. Lake Street at B Street: Install a traffic signal and design for three-phase operation. Widen have been identified to mitigate the traffic impacts at the intersections and roadways impacted by the Year and/or restripe the intersection to provide a southbound left turn lane. 2024/1,191st DU Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 20 of Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) traffic conditions. P. Collier Avenue at Nichols Road: Install a traffic signal and design for three-phase operation (These improvements are in addition to the improvements recommended under the Year 2017, Year 2020, with protected westbound left turn on Nichols Road. Widen and/or restripe the intersection to and Year 2022 traffic conditions): provide a westbound left turn lane. U. Lake Street at Alberhill Ridge Road: Widen Lake Street at Alberhill Ridge Road to provide a Q. Phases 5 through 10 Improvements: Construct Alberhill Ridge Road to its full roadway width second southbound through lane one-quarter mile north and south of the intersection. (curb-to-curb) as a Divided Collector roadway (two lanes plus median) between "C" Street and V. Lake Street at A Street: Stripe A Street to provide for separate westbound right turn and left turn "B" Street and construct "B" Street to its full roadway width (curb-to-curb) as a Divided lanes. Widen Lake Street at A Street to provide a second southbound through lane one-quarter Collector roadway (two lanes plus median) between Lake Street and Alberhill Ridge Road. mile north and south of the intersection. Construct the intersection of Alberhill Ridge Road and `B" Street as an all-way stop with one left turn lane and one shared through-right turn lane on all approaches, except the westbound W. Lake Street at B Street: Widen Lake Street at B Street to provide a second southbound through approach, which does not exist in Phases 1 through 10. Construct the westbound approach with lane one-quarter mile north and south of the intersection. one left turn lane and one shared through-right turn lane at Alberhill Ridge Road and"C" Street. X. Lake Street between Temescal Canyon Road and B Street: Widen Lake Street between 1-15 SB 8.3 Year 2022/1,191st DU Alberhill Ranch & Phases 1 through 14 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions Ramps and Temescal Canyon Road to provide a second southbound travel lane. The results of the Year 2022/1,191st DU Alberhill Ranch & Phases 1 through 14 Alberhill Ridge AM and Y. Lake Street at C Street: Widen Lake Street at C Street to provide a second northbound through PM peak hour & Daily traffic conditions level of service analysis indicate that the proposed Project will lane one-quarter mile north and south of the intersection. impact two (2) key study intersections. The following improvements listed below have been identified to Z. Lake Street at Alberhill Ranch Road: Widen and/or restripe Lake Street at Alberhill Ranch mitigate the traffic impacts at the intersections and roadways impacted by the Year 2022/1,191st DU Road to provide a second northbound through lane one-quarter mile north and south of the Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 14 of Alberhill Ridge traffic conditions. (These improvements are in intersection. Modify the traffic signal, accordingly. addition to the improvements recommended under the Year 2017 and Year 2020 traffic conditions): AA. Phases 15 through 20 Improvements: Construct Alberhill Ridge Road to its full roadway R. Lake Street at Alberhill Ridge Road: Widen and restripe Lake Street at Alberhill Ridge Road to width (curb-to-curb) as a Divided Collector roadway (two lanes plus median) between Lake provide a second northbound through lane one-quarter mile north and south of the intersection. Street and"A" Street. Widen and/or restripe Lake Street at Alberhill Ridge Road to provide an exclusive southbound left turn lane. S. Lake Street at A Street: Widen and restripe Lake Street at A Street to provide a second northbound through lane one-quarter mile north and south of the intersection. Widen and/or restripe Lake Street at A Street to provide an exclusive southbound left turn lane. T. Phases 11 through 14 Improvements: Construct Alberhill Ridge Road to its full roadway width (curb-to-curb) as a Divided Collector roadway (two lanes plus median) between "B" Street and "A" Street and construct "A" Street to its full roadway width (curb-to-curb) as a Local Collector roadway (two lanes) between Lake Street and Alberhill Ridge Road. Construct the intersection of Alberhill Ridge Road and"A" Street as an all-way stop with one left turn lane and one shared LINSCOTT,LAW&GREENSPAN,engineers LLG Ref.2-09-3064-1 10 Alberhill Ridge,Lake Elsinore N:\3000\2093064\2011-2012 Update\Report\3064 Alberhill Ridge Updated Draft COA Report,Lake Elsinore 02-29-12(l lxl7).doc 9.0 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (ALL RIDGE PLUS 266TH DU OF 9.1 Year 2017/1, 266th DU Alberhill Ranch & Phases 1 through 4 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions RANCH) Review of Column 2 of Table 6C indicates that two (2) of the twenty (20) key study intersections are forecast to operate at an adverse level of service for Year 2017/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 Table SC summarizes the Volume, V/C and LOS for the nineteen (19) key study roadway segments for the through 4 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions based on the HCM methodology and All Ridge plus 266th DU of Ranch scenario mentioned above and indicates which roadway segments are the City's LOS standards. The intersections, reported below, are forecast to operate at an unacceptable LOS forecast to operate at adverse service levels based on the City of Lake Elsinore and Riverside County LOS during the peak hour indicated: criteria. In addition, Table 5C also shows the resultant LOS associated with the implementation of either one or two potential improvements and shows the resultant LOS (in green) of the study roadway segment AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour based on the associated intersection mitigation measures identified in Table 6C. It should be noted that Key Intersection Delav(s/v) LOS Delay ON) LOS improvements for the roadway segments were only recommended for roadway segments that were forecast 2. Lake Street at I-15 Suhbound Ramps -- -- 131.8 F to operate at adverse LOS and had one or both adjacent intersections that required an additional through 17. I-15 Northbound Ramps at Nichols road -- -- 457.0 F lane as a mitigation measure. The first column (1) of V/C & LOS values in Table 5C presents a summary of Existing Year 2011/2661h DU of Alberhill Ranch Daily traffic conditions. The second column (2) As shown in Column 3 of Table 6C, the recommended mitigation improvements outlined in this report will presents the Year 2017/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 4 of Alberhill Ridge Daily improve the Year 2017/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 4 of Alberhill Ridge service traffic conditions. The third column (3) presents the Year 2020/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 levels to acceptable LOS conditions. The recommended improvements for Year 2017 are shown in red on through 10 of Alberhill Ridge Daily traffic conditions. The fourth column (4) presents the Year 2022/266th Figure 4C. It should be noted these improvements have been carried over to the future years as part of the DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 14 of Alberhill Ridge Daily traffic conditions. The fifth background condition. column (5) presents the Year 2024/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 20 of Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) Daily traffic conditions. Appendix E contains the Year 2017/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 4 of Alberhill traffic conditions Delay/LOS calculation worksheets for the key study intersections. Table 6C summarizes the vehicle Delay and LOS for the twenty (20) key study intersections for the All Ridge plus 266th DU of Ranch scenario mentioned above. In addition, Table 6C also shows the resultant 9.2 Year 20201266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill Ridge Traffic LOS associated with the recommended mitigation measures needed to bring the impacted intersections to Conditions acceptable LOS based on the City of Lake Elsinore and Riverside County LOS criteria. The first column Review of Column 4 of Table 6C indicates that one (1) of the twenty (20) key study intersections are (1) of HCM/LOS values in Table 6C presents a summary of Existing Year 2011/266th DU of Alberhill forecast to operate at adverse levels of service for Year 2020/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 Ranch AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions. The second column (2) presents the Year 2017/266' DU through 10 of Alberhill Ridge traffic conditions based on the HCM methodology and the City's LOS of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 4 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions. standards. The intersections, reported below, are forecast to operate at an unacceptable LOS during the The third column (3) presents the Year 2017/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 4 of peak hour indicated: Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions with mitigation. The fourth column (4) presents the Year 2020/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour hour traffic conditions. The fifth column (5) presents the Year 2020/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Key Intersection Delav(s/v) LOS Delay ON) LOS Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions with mitigation. The sixth 6. Lake Street at B Street -- -- 41.2 E column (6) presents the Year 2022/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 14 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions. The seventh column (7) presents the Year 2022/266' DU As shown in Column 5 of Table 6C, the recommended mitigation improvements outlined in this report will of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 14 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions improve the Year 2020/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill Ridge service with mitigation. The eighth column (8) presents the Year 2024/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 levels to acceptable LOS conditions. The recommended improvements for Year 2020 are shown in green through 20 of Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions. The ninth column (9) on Figure 4C. It should be noted these improvements have been carried over to the future years as part of presents the Year 2024/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 20 of Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) the background condition. AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions with mitigation. Appendix C of the Appendices in Volume 3 th contains the Year 2011/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch Existing traffic conditions Delay/LOS calculation Appendix E of the Appendices in Volume 3 contains the Year 2020/266 DU of Alberhill Ranch and worksheets for the key study intersections. Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions Delay/LOS calculation worksheets for the key study intersections. It should be noted that the recommended improvements identified as mitigation for a specific horizon year, when needed, have been carried over to the future years as part of the background condition. LINSCOTT,LAW&GREENSPAN,engineers LLG Ref.2-09-3064-1 11 Alberhill Ridge,Lake Elsinore N:\3000\2093064\2011-2012 Update\Report\3064 Alberhill Ridge Updated Draft COA Report,Lake Elsinore 02-29-12(l lxl7).doc 9.3 Year 20221266t" DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 14 of Alberhill Ridge Traffic and/or roadway widening/restriping to reconfigure roadways (add lanes) to specific approaches of a key Conditions intersection. The identified improvements are the basis for understanding the projected roadway Review of Column 6 of Table 6C indicates that one (1) of the twenty (20) key study intersections are infrastructure requirements resulting in the recommended traffic improvements to be considered within the forecast to operate at adverse levels of service for Year 2022/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 Conditions of Approval (COA) for the proposed project under this scenario. In addition, it is through 14 of Alberhill Ridge DU traffic conditions based on the HCM methodology and the City's LOS recommended that the Developer cause a Traffic Study to be prepared and submitted to the City of Lake standards. The intersections, reported below, are forecast to operate at an unacceptable LOS during the Elsinore at the completion of the first 200 CofO's in the Alberhill Ridge project and every 100 CofO's peak hour indicated: thereafter until completion of the project in order to evaluate the existing traffic counts and traffic impacts of the Alberhill Ridge development associated with the trigger to actually construct the recommended AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour improvements. Any identified traffic improvements in the periodic traffic studies shall be constructed Key Intersection Delay ON) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS within 100 CofO's or 18 months of the acceptance of the Traffic Study by the City of Lake Elsinore 1. Lake Street at I-15 Northbound Ramps 39.9 E -- -- whichever occurs first. Appendix E contains the Year 2022/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 14 of Alberhill 10.1 Year 20171266t" DU Alberhill Ranch & Phases 1 through 4 Alberhill Ridge Recommended Ridge Traffic Conditions Delay/LOS calculation worksheets for the key study intersections. Traffic Improvements The results of the Year 2017/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 4 of Alberhill Ridge AM 9.4 Year 20241 DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 20 (Buildout) of Alberhill Ridge and PM peak hour traffic conditions level of service analysis indicate that the proposed Project will impact Traffic Conditions ns two (2) key study intersections. The following improvements listed below have been identified to mitigate Review of Column 8 of Table 6C indicates that five (5) of the twenty (20) key study intersections are the traffic impacts at the intersections impacted by the Year 2017/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases forecast to operate at adverse levels of service for Year 2024/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 1 through 4 of Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions: through 20 of Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) traffic conditions based on the HCM methodology and the City's LOS standards. These intersections, reported below, are forecast to operate at an unacceptable LOS during BB. Lake Street at I-15 Southbound Ramps: Widen and restripe the Southbound Off-Ramp (east- west direction) and Lake Street to provide an eastbound free-right turn lane. the peak hour indicated: CC. I-15 Southbound Ramps at Nichols Road: Install a traffic signal and design for three-phase AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour operation with protected westbound left turn on Nichols Road. Key Intersection Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS 3. Lake Street at Temescal Canyon Road -- -- 74.5 F DD. I-15 Northbound Ramps at Nichols Road: Install a traffic signal and design for three-phase 4. Lake Street at Alberhill Ridge Road 42.1 E 42.2 E operation with protected eastbound left turn on Nichols Road. 5. Lake Street at A Street 37.7 E __ __ EE. Phases 1 through 4 Improvements: Construct Alberhill Ridge Road to its full roadway width 9. Lake Street at Alberhill Ranch Road -- -- 63.7 E (curb-to-curb) as a Divided Collector roadway (two lanes plus median) between Nichols Road and "C" Street and construct "C" Street to its full roadway width (curb-to-curb) as a Local As shown in Column 9 of Table 6C, the recommended improvements outlined in this report will improve Collector roadway (two lanes) between Lake Street and Alberhill Ridge Road. Construct the th intersection of Alberhill Ridge Road and "C" Street as an all-way stop with one left turn lane the Year 2024/266 DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 20 of Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) service levels to acceptable LOS conditions. The recommended improvements for Year 2024 are shown in blue on and one shared through-right turn lane on all approaches, except the westbound approach, Figure 4C. which does not exist in Phases 1 through 4. Appendix E contains the Year 2024/266th DU of Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 20 of Alberhill 10.2 Year 20201266t" DU Alberhill Ranch & Phases 1 through 10 Alberhill Ridge Recommended Ridge (Buildout) Traffic Conditions Delay/LOS calculation worksheets for the key study intersections. Traffic Improvements The results of the Year 2020/266th DU Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill Ridge AM 10.0 RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS (CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR ALL RIDGE and PM peak hour & Daily traffic conditions level of service analysis indicate that the proposed Project PLUS 266TH DU OF RANCH SCENARIO) will impact one (1) key study intersection. The following improvements listed below have been identified to mitigate the traffic impacts at the intersections and roadways impacted by the Year 2020/1,191 st DU For those intersections where projected traffic volumes are expected to result in unacceptable operating Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 10 of Alberhill Ridge traffic conditions. (These improvements are in conditions, this report recommends traffic improvements that change the intersection traffic control and/or addition to the improvements recommended under the Year 2017 traffic conditions): geometry to increase capacity. These capacity improvements involve traffic signal installation/modification 30 LINSCOTT,LAW&GREENSPAN,engineers LLG Ref.2-09-3064-1 12 Alberhill Ridge,Lake Elsinore N:\3000\2093064\2011-2012 Update\Report\3064 Alberhill Ridge Updated Draft COA Report,Lake Elsinore 02-29-12(11xl7).doc FF. Lake Street at B Street: Install a traffic signal and design for three-phase operation with KK. Lake Street at Temescal Canyon Road Widen and restripe Lake Street at Alberhill Ranch protected southbound left turn on Lake Street. Widen and/or restripe the intersection to provide Road to provide a second southbound through lane one-quarter mile south of the intersection. a southbound left turn lane. Modify the traffic signal, accordingly GG. Phases 5 through 10 Improvements: Construct Alberhill Ridge Road to its full roadway LL. Lake Street between I-15 SB Ramps and Alberhill Ridge Road: Widen Lake Street between width (curb-to-curb) as a Divided Collector roadway (two lanes plus median) between "C" 1-15 SB Ramps and Alberhill Ridge Road to provide a second southbound travel lane. Street and `B" Street and construct `B" Street to its full roadway width (curb-to-curb) as a MM. Lake Street at Alberhill Ridge Road: Widen Lake Street at Alberhill Ridge Road to provide Divided Collector roadway (two lanes plus median) between Lake Street and Alberhill Ridge a second southbound and second northbound through lane one-quarter mile north and south of Road. Construct the intersection of Alberhill Ridge Road and `B" Street as an all-way stop with the intersection. one left turn lane and one shared through-right turn lane on all approaches, except the westbound approach, which does not exist in Phases 1 through 10. Construct the westbound NN. Lake Street at A Street: Stripe A Street to provide for separate westbound right turn and left approach with one left turn lane and one shared through-right turn lane at Alberhill Ridge Road turn lanes. and"C" Street. 00. Lake Street at Alberhill Ranch Road: Widen and/or restripe Lake Street at Alberhill Ranch Road to provide a second northbound through lane one-quarter mile north and south of the 10.3 Year 20221266t" DU Alberhill Ranch & Phases 1 through 14 Alberhill Ridge Traffic Conditions intersection. Modify the traffic signal, accordingly. The results of the Year 2022/266th DU Alberhill Ranch & Phases 1 through 14 Alberhill Ridge AM and PM peak hour & Daily traffic conditions level of service analysis indicate that the proposed Project will PP. Phases 15 through 20 Improvements: Construct Alberhill Ridge Road to its full roadway impact one (1) key study intersection. The following improvements listed below have been identified to width (curb-to-curb) as a Divided Collector roadway (two lanes plus median) between Lake mitigate the traffic impacts at the intersections and roadways impacted by the Year 2022/1,191st DU Street and"A" Street. Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 14 of Alberhill Ridge traffic conditions. (These improvements are in addition to the improvements recommended under the Year 2017 and Year 2020 traffic conditions): HH. Lake Street at I-15 Northbound Ramps: Install a traffic signal and design for two-phase operation. 11. Lake Street at I-15 Southbound Ramps: Install a traffic signal and design for two-phase operation. JJ. Phases 11 through 14 Improvements: Construct Alberhill Ridge Road to its full roadway width (curb-to-curb) as a Divided Collector roadway (two lanes plus median) between "B" Street and "A" Street and construct "A" Street to its full roadway width (curb-to-curb) as a Local Collector roadway (two lanes) between Lake Street and Alberhill Ridge Road. Construct the intersection of Alberhill Ridge Road and "A" Street as an all-way stop with one left turn lane and one shared through-right turn lane on all approaches, except the westbound approach, which does not exist in Phases 1 through 14. Construct the westbound approach with one left turn lane and one shared through-right turn lane at Alberhill Ridge Road and`B" Street. 10.4 Year 20241266t" DU Alberhill Ranch & Phases 1 through 20 Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) Recommended Traffic Improvements The results of the Year 2024/266th DU Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 20 of Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) AM and PM peak hour & Daily traffic conditions level of service analysis indicate that the proposed Project will impact four (4) key study intersections. The following improvements listed below have been identified to mitigate the traffic impacts at the intersections and roadways impacted by the Year 2024/266' DU Alberhill Ranch and Phases 1 through 20 of Alberhill Ridge (Buildout) traffic conditions. (These improvements are in addition to the improvements recommended under the Year 2017, Year 2020, and Year 2022 traffic conditions): LINSCOTT,LAW&GREENSPAN,engineers LLG Ref.2-09-3064-1 13 Alberhill Ridge,Lake Elsinore N:\3000\2093064\2011-2012 Update\Report\3064 Alberhill Ridge Updated Draft COA Report,Lake Elsinore 02-29-12(l lxl7).doc 11.0 RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY Tables 6D and 6E present a summary of the recommended improvement comparison between the three development scenarios, which details whether the improvement is required by Alberhill Ridge or Alberhill Ranch. In addition, As presented in Figure IOA (Year 2024 All Ridge plus All Ranch Daily Traffic Volumes), the forecast maximum daily traffic volume on C Street between Lake Street and Alberhill Ridge Road is 4,081 ADT, which will not impact C Street as a residential Collector roadway. LINSCOTT,LAW&GREENSPAN,engineers LLG Ref.2-09-3064-1 14 Alberhill Ridge,Lake Elsinore N:\3000\2093064\2011-2012 Update\Report\3064 Alberhill Ridge Updated Draft COA Report,Lake Elsinore 02-29-12(l lxl7).doc LINSCOTT GREENSPAN TABLE 3 TABLE 4 PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST(BY PHASES) PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST(BY PHASES) ALBERHILL RIDGE,LAKE ELSINORE ALBERHILL RANCH DEVELOPMENT,LAKE ELSINORE Planning Land Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Phase Area Use Size 2-Way Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Phase Use Size 2-Way Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total 1 3 Retail/Multi-Family Residential 170,000 SF/40 DU 9,852 133 98 231 462 471 933 3 Single Family Residential 17 DU 163 3 10 13 11 6 17 1 5 Multi-Family Residential 330 DU 2,178 37 135 172 135 73 208 4 Multi-Family Residential 144 DU 958 14 59 73 58 32 90 2 4 Single Family Residential 65 DU 654 13 36 49 41 24 65 3 8D Single Family Residential 59 DU 594 12 32 44 38 22 60 5 Single Family Residential 37 DU 354 7 21 28 24 14 38 Alberhill Ranch Trip Generation Forecast Single Family Residences=54 DU 4 BD Single Family Residential 41 DU 413 8 23 31 26 16 42 1,475 24 90 114 93 52 145 Commercial=170,000 SF (266`"DU-464`"DU) Multi-Family Residences=144 DU Alberhill Ridge Trip Generation Forecast(Phases 1-4) Apartments=370 DU 13,691 203 324 527 702 606 1,308 Alberhill Ranch Trip Generation Forecast Single Family Residences:132ODDUU I Single Family Residences=165 DU Commercial= 11r1 Alberhill Ridge Trip Generation Forecast r . I 606 I: 4 Elementary School 850 Students 1,097 213 170 383 60 68 128 Single Family Residences= • 5 Single Family Residential 165 DU 1,579 31 92 123 106 61 167 6 Single Family Residential 21 DU 201 4 12 16 13 8 21 5 8C Single Family Residential 85 DU 855 17 47 64 54 31 85 Alberhill Ranch Trip Generation Forecast Elementary School=850 Students 6 8C Single Family Residential 72 DU 724 14 40 54 46 27 73 (464`"DU-650`"DU) Single Family Residences=186 DU 2,877 248 274 522 179 137 316 7 2E Single Family Residential 77 DU 775 15 42 57 49 28 77 8 2D Public Park 6 Acres 40 1 1 2 1 1 2 Alberhill Ranch Trip Generation Forecast Single Family Residences=506 DU Multi-Family Residences= ,, DU 9 2C Single Family Residential 57 DU 573 11 31 42 36 21 57 th ` ary 850 Students 10 2C Single Family Residential 68 DU 684 14 37 51 44 25 69 6 Single Family Residential 61 DU 584 12 34 46 39 23 62 Alberhill Ridge Trip Generation Forecast(Phases 5-10) Single Family Residences=359 DU 3,651 72 198 270 230 133 363 7 Single Family Residential 197 DU 1.885 37 110 147 126 73 199 Public Park=6 Acres 8 Single Family Residential 42 DU 402 8 24 32 27 16 43 Commercial= 0�SF Alberhill Ranch Trip Generation Forecast Alberhill Ridge Trip Generation Forecast Apartments=370 Single Family Residences=300 DU 2,871 57 168 225 192 112 304 Year 2020(Phases 1.10) Single Family Residences=524 DU (650 0'DU-950'DU) Public Park=G Acres Alberhill Ranch Trip Generation Forecast Single Family Residences=:1. . Year 1 Students 11 26 Single Family Residential 95 DU 956 19 52 71 61 35 96 ` 12 28 Single Family Residential 90 DU 905 18 50 68 58 33 91 8 Single Family Residential 153 DU 1,464 29 86 115 98 57 155 13 86 Single Family Residential 54 DU 543 11 30 41 35 20 55 9 Multi-Family Residential 88 DU 585 9 36 45 35 19 54 14 86 Single Family Residential 58 DU 583 12 32 44 37 21 58 Alberhill Ranch Trip Generation Forecast Single Family Residences=153 DU Alberhill Ridge Trip Generation Forecast(Phases 11-14) Single Family Residences=297 DU 2,987 60 164 224 191 109 300 (950`"DU-1,191"DU) Multi-Family Residences=88 DUAlberhill Ridge Trip Generation Forecast Apartments=370 DU Total Alberhill Ranch Trip Generation Forecast 69 DU 2,049 38 122 160 133 76 209 Commercial=170,000 SF Single Family Residences=9"; r Year 2022(Phases 1-14) Single Family Residences=821 DU Year r 1 Students Public Park=6 Acres 9 Multi-Family Residential 141 DU 938 14 58 72 57 31 88 15 2A Single Family Residential 58 DU 583 12 32 44 37 21 58 10 Single Family Residential 208 DU 1,991 40 116 156 133 77 210 16 2A Single Family Residential 40 DU 402 8 22 30 26 15 41 11 Single Family Residential 72 DU 689 14 40 54 46 27 73 17 2A Single Family Residential 46 DU 463 9 25 34 29 17 46 Alberhill Ranch Trip Generation Forecast Single Family Residences=280 DU 9 Y 3,618 68 214 282 236 135 371 18 8A Single Family Residential 45 DU 453 9 25 34 29 17 46 (1,191"DU-1,6120 DU) Multi-Family Residences=141 DU 19 8A Single Family Residential 26 DU 262 5 14 19 17 10 27 Family Residences ' 20 1A Retail/Multi-Family Residential 82,500 SF/16 DU 3,873 63 33 96 150 166 316 I ` Year 2020 .. ntary School=850 Students Commercial=82,500 SF Alberhill Ridge Trip Generation Forecast(Phases 15-20) Apartments=16 DU 6,036 106 151 257 288 246 534 Single Family Residences=215 DU Commercial=252,500 SF Total Alberhill Ridge Trip Generation Forecast Apartments=386 DU, 26,365 441 837 1,278 1,411 1,094 [2,�05 Year 2024(Phases 1-20) Single Family Residences=1 036 DU Public Park=6 Acres File:N'43000t209306 December 2011 Update-\Tab1ee13160 P,.1-Trip Generation.xh Date:12/13/2011 File:N:4300012093064H December 2011 Update ATables13160 Project Trip(3--ii—A, Date:12/13I2011 Tab:Table 3 Formatted Tlma.5:10 PM Tab:Table 4 Formatted Time:5:10 PM LINSCOTT TABLE 5A GREENSPAN PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT MATRIX ROADWAY SEGMENTS(ALL RIDGE PLUS ALL RANCH) ALBERHILL RIDGE, LAKE ELSINORE d (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) R Year 2017 Year 2020 Year 2022 Year 2024 LOS Year 2011 With With With With 0 Type ,� "E" Existing Alberhill Ranch(1,1918t DU)& Alberhill Ranch(1,612t"DU)& Alberhill Ranch(1,612t"DU)& Alberhill Ranch(1,612t"DU)& of E Capacity with Ranch 266t"DU Alberhill Ride Phases 1-4 Alberhill Ride hoses 1-10) Alberhill Ride hoses 1-14 Alberhill Ride Phases 1-20 No. Roadway Segment Roadway z (VPD) Volume V/C LOS Volume V/C LOS Volume V/C LOS Volume V/C LOS Volume V/C LOS Lake Street between I-15 SB Ramps& Arterial 2U 18,000 19,984 1.110 F 23,292 1.294 F 259424 1.412 F 26,913 1.495 F 29,600 1.644 F A. Temescal Canyon Rd Potential Improvement I Arterial 4D 35,900 19,984 0.557 A 23,292 0.649 B 25,424 0.708 C 26,913 0.750 C 29,600 0.825 D Potential Improvement 2 Urban Arterial 6D 53,900 19,984 0.371 A 23,292 0.432 A 25,424 0.472 A 26,913 0.499 A 29,600 0.549 A Lake Street between Temescal Canyon Rd& Arterial 2U 18,000 17,722 0.985 E 21,867 1.215 F 24,199 1.344 F 25,744 1.430 F 28,792 1.600 F B. Alberhill Ridge Road Potential improvement) Arterial 4D 35,900 17,722 0.494 A 21,867 0.609 B 24,199 0.674 B 25,744 0.717 C 28,792 0.802 D Potential Improvement 2 Urban Arterial 6D 53,900 17,722 0.329 A 21,867 0.406 A 24,199 0.449 A 25,744 0.478 A 28,792 0.534 A Lake Street between C. Alberhill Ridge Road& Arterial 2U 18,000 17,722 0.985 E 219700 1.206 F 239518 1.307 F 24,746 1.375 F 26,247 1.458 F A Street Potential Improvement) Arterial 4D 35,900 17,722 0.494 A 21,700 0.604 B 23,518 0.655 B 24,746 0.689 B 26,247 0.731 C Lake Street between D. A Street& Arterial 2U 18,000 179722 0.985 E 219700 1.206 F 239518 1.307 F 24,360 1.353 F 25,929 1.441 F B Street PotentlalImprovement I Arterial 4D 35,900 17,722 0.494 A 21,700 0.604 B 23,518 0.655 B 24,360 0.679 B 25,929 0.722 C Lake Street between E. B Street& Arterial 2U 18,000 17,722 0.985 E 21,700 1.206 F 23,627 1.313 F 24,863 1.381 F 26,431 1.468 F C Street Potential Improvement) Arterial 4D 35,900 17,722 0.494 A 21,700 0.604 B 23,627 0.658 B 24,863 0.693 B 26,431 0.736 C Lake Street between F. C Street& Arterial 2U 18,000 17,722 0.985 E 21,571 1.198 F 23,458 1.303 F 24,694 1.372 F 26,263 1.459 F Nichols Road Potentiallmprovementl Arterial 4D 35,900 17,722 0.494 A 21,571 0.601 B 23,458 0.653 B 24,694 0.688 B 26,263 0.732 C Lake Street between Nichols Road& Arterial 2U 18,000 17,422 0.968 E 20,955 1.164 F 22,584 1.255 F 23,633 1.313 F 25,096 1.394 F G. Alberhill Ranch Road Potential Improvement) Arterial 3U 27,000 17,722 0.656 B 21,571 0.799 C 23,458 0.869 D 24,694 0.915 E 26,263 0.973 E Potential Improvement 2 Arterial 4D 35,900 17,422 0.485 A 20,955 0.584 A 22,584 0.629 B 23,633 0.658 B 25,096 0.699 B Lake Street between Alberhill Ranch Road& Arterial 2U 18,000 14,824 0.824 D 20,408 1.134 F 21,874 1.215 F 22,811 1.267 F 24,167 1.343 F H. Mountain Street Potential improvement) Arterial 3U 27,000 14,824 0.549 A 20,408 0.756 C 21,874 0.810 D 22,811 0.845 D 24,167 0.895 D Potential Improvement 2 Arterial 4D 35,900 14,824 0.413 A 20,408 0.568 A 21,874 0.609 B 22,811 0.635 B 24,167 0.673 B Nichols Road between I. Lake Street& Arterial 2U 18,000 UNDER CONSTRUCTION 3,233 0.180 A 3,661 0.203 A 3,835 0.213 A 3,928 0.218 A A.Ridge/A.Ranch Rd Nichols Road between J. A.Ridge/A.Ranch Rd& Arterial 2U 18,000 DOES NOT EXIST 7,318 0.407 A 8,299 0.461 A 8,695 0.483 A 10,222 0.568 A Terra Cotta Road Nichols Road between K. Terra Cotta Road& Arterial 2U 18,000 DOES NOT EXIST 7,464 0.415 A 9,393 0.522 A 9,607 0.534 A 10,472 0.582 A Pierce Street Nichols Road between L. Pierce Street& Arterial 2U 19,000 DOES NOT EXIST 7,464 0.415 A 11,465 0.637 B 11,679 0.649 B 12,544 0.697 B Collier Road A.Ridge Road between M. Lake Street& Divided Collector 2D 18,000 DOES NOT EXIST 166 0.009 A 745 0.041 A 1,062 0.059 A 3,931 0.218 A A Street A Street between N. Lake Street& Collector 2U 13,000 DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST 576 0.044 A 830 0.064 A Alberhill Ridge Road B Street between O. Lake Street& Collector 2U 13,000 DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST 658 0.051 A 1,051 0.081 A 1,051 0.081 A Alberhill Ridge Road C Street between P. Lake Street& Collector 2U 13,000 DOES NOT EXIST 4,053 0.312 A 4,081 0.314 A 4,081 0.314 A 4,081 0.314 A Alberhill Ridge Road A.Ridge Road between Q. A Street& Divided Collector 2D 18,000 DOES NOT EXIST 1,644 0.091 A 2,223 0.124 A 2,223 0.124 A 3,657 0.203 A B Street A.Ridge Road between R. B Street& Divided Collector 2D 18,000 DOES NOT EXIST 3,122 0.173 A 3,356 0.186 A 3,577 0.199 A 5,011 0.278 A C Street A.Ridge Road between S. C Street& Divided Collector 2D 18,000 DOES NOT EXIST 464 0.026 A 1,017 0.057 A 1,238 0.069 A 2,672 0.148 A Nichols Road Notes DU=Dwelling Unit • VPD=Vehicles per Day • V/C=Volume to Capacity Ratio • U=Undivided,D=Divided • A.Ridge/A.Ranch Rd=Alberhill Ridge/Alberhill Ranch Road • Bold LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on City of Lake Elsinore LOS Standards • Green represents LOS associated with recommended improvements within the roadway segment. Path:N:\3000\209306M2011-2012 Update\Ta1b1es\3064 Project Traffc Impact Matrix-Roadways.ds Dale:2/29/2012 Tab:Roadway Segments Time:3:38 PM LINSCOTT TABLE 513 GREENSPAN PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT MATRIX ROADWAY SEGMENTS(ALL RIDGE PLUS 1191 ST DU OF RANCH) ALBERHILL RIDGE, LAKE ELSINORE (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) d R Year 2017 Year 2020 Year 2022 Year 2024 LOS Year 2011 With With With With 0 Type ,� "E" Existing Alberhill Ranch(1,1918t DU)& Alberhill Ranch(1,191at DU)& Alberhill Ranch(1,191st DU)& Alberhill Ranch(1,191st DU)& of S Capacity with Ranch 266th DU Alberhill Ride Phases 1-4 Alberhill Ride Phases 1-10 Alberhill Ride hases 1-14 Alberhill Ride Phases 1-20 No. Roadway Segment Roadway z (VPD) Volume V/C LOS Volume V/C LOS Volume V/C LOS Volume V/C LOS Volume V/C LOS Lake Street between I-15 SB Ramps& Arterial 2U 18,000 19,984 1.110 F 23,292 1.294 F 259424 1.412 F 26,913 1.495 F 29,600 1.644 F A. Temescal Canyon Rd Potential Improvement I Arterial 3U 27,000 19,984 0.740 C 23,292 0.863 D 25,424 0.942 E 26,913 0.997 E 29,600 1.096 F Potential Improvement 2 Arterial 4D 35,900 19,984 0.557 A 23,292 0.649 B 25,424 0.708 C 26,913 0.750 C 29,600 0.825 D Potential Improvement Urban Arterial 6D 53,900 19,984 0.371 A 23,292 0.432 A 25,424 0.472 A 26,913 0.499 A 29,600 0.549 A Lake Street between Temescal Canyon Rd& Arterial 2U 18,000 17,722 0.985 E 219867 1.215 F 24,018 1.334 F 25,563 1.420 F 28,612 1.590 F B. Alberhill Ridge Road Potential Improvement I Arterial 3U 27,000 17,722 0.656 B 21,867 0.810 D 24,018 0.890 D 25,563 0.947 E 28,612 1.060 F Potential Improvement 2 Arterial 4D 35,900 17,722 0.494 A 21,867 0.609 B 24,018 0.669 B 25,563 0.712 C 28,612 0.797 C Lake Street between Alberhill Ridge Road& Arterial 2U 18,000 17,722 0.985 E 21,700 1.206 F 23,337 1.297 F 24,566 1.365 F 26,065 1.448 F C. A Street Potential improvement I Arterial 3U 27,000 17,722 0.656 B 21,700 0.804 D 23,337 0.864 D 24,566 0.910 E 26,065 0.965 E Potential Improvement 2 Arterial 4D 35,900 17,722 0.494 A 21,700 0.604 B 23,337 0.650 B 24,566 0.684 B 26,065 0.726 C Lake Street between A Street& Arterial 2U 18,000 17,722 0.985 E 219700 1.206 F 239337 1.297 F 24,179 1.343 F 25,748 1.430 F D. B Street Potential Improvement I Arterial 3U 27,000 17,722 0.656 B 21,700 0.804 D 23,337 0.864 D 24,179 0.896 D 25,748 0.954 E Potential Improvement 2 Arterial 4D 35,900 17,722 0.494 A 21,700 0.604 B 23,337 0.650 B 24,179 0.674 B 25,748 0.717 C Lake Street between B Street& Arterial 2U 18,000 17,722 0.985 E 21,700 1.206 F 23,446 1.303 F 24,681 1.371 F 26,251 1.458 F E. C Street Potential improvement 1 Arterial 3U 27,000 17,722 0.656 B 21,700 0.804 D 23,446 0.868 D 24,681 0.914 E 26,251 0.972 E Potential Improvement 2 Arterial 4D 35,900 17,722 0.494 A 21,700 0.604 B 23,446 0.653 B 24,681 0.687 B 26,251 0.731 C Lake Street between C Street& Arterial 2U 18,000 17,722 0.985 E 21,571 1.198 F 23,278 1.293 F 24,513 1.362 F 26,083 1.449 F F. Nichols Road Potential Improvement I Arterial 3U 27,000 17,722 0.656 B 21,571 0.799 C 23,278 0.862 D 24,513 0.908 E 26,083 0.966 E Potential Improvement 2 Arterial 4D 35,900 17,722 0.494 A 21,571 0.601 B 23,278 0.648 B 24,513 0.683 B 26,083 0.727 C Lake Street between Nichols Road& Arterial 2U 18,000 17,422 0.968 E 20,955 1.164 F 22,490 1.249 F 23,539 1.308 F 25,002 1.389 F G. Alberhill Ranch Road Potential improvement 1 Arterial 3U 27,000 17,422 0.645 B 20,955 0.776 C 22,490 0.833 D 23,539 0.872 D 25,002 0.926 E Potential Improvement 2 Arterial 4D 35,900 17,422 0.485 A 20,955 0.584 A 22,490 0.626 B 23,539 0.656 B 25,002 0.696 B Lake Street between Alberhill Ranch Road& Arterial 2U 18,000 14,824 0.824 D 20,408 1.134 F 21,780 1.210 F 22,717 1.262 F 24,073 1.337 F H. Mountain Street Potential Improvement I Arterial 3U 27,000 14,824 0.549 A 20,408 0.756 C 21,780 0.807 D 22,717 0.841 D 24,073 0.892 D Potential Improvement 2 Arterial 4D 35,900 14,824 0.413 A 20,408 0.568 A 21,780 0.607 B 22,717 0.633 B 24,073 0.671 B Nichols Road between 1. Lake Street& Arterial 2U 18,000 UNDER CONSTRUCTION 3,233 0.180 A 3,385 0.188 A 3,561 0.198 A 3,653 0.203 A A.Ridge/A.Ranch Rd Nichols Road between J. A.Ridge/A.Ranch Rd& Arterial 2U 18,000 DOES NOT EXIST 7,318 0.407 A 8,025 0.446 A 8,421 0.468 A 9,946 0.553 A Tema Cotta Road Nichols Road between K. Terra Cotta Road& Arterial 2U 18,000 DOES NOT EXIST 7,464 0.415 A 7,845 0.436 A 8,059 0.448 A 8,924 0.496 A Pierce Street Nichols Road between L. Pierce Street& Arterial 211 18,000 DOES NOT EXIST 7,464 0.415 A 9,113 0.506 A 9,327 0.518 A 10,192 0.566 A Collier Road A.Ridge Road between M Lake Street& Divided Collector 2D 18,000 DOES NOT EXIST 166 0.009 A 745 0.041 A 1,062 0.059 A 3,931 0.218 A A Street A Street between N. Lake Street& Collector 2U 13,000 DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST 576 0.044 A 830 0.064 A Alberhill Ridge Road B Street between O. Lake Street& Collector 211 13,000 DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST 658 1 0.051 A 1,051 0.081 A 1,051 0.081 A Alberhill Ridge Road C Street between P. Lake Street& Collector 2U 13,000 DOES NOT EXIST 4,053 0.312 A 4,081 0.314 A 4,081 0.314 A 4,081 0.314 A Alberhill Ridge Road A.Ridge Road between Q. A Street& Divided Collector 2D 18,000 DOES NOT EXIST 1,644 0.091 A 2,223 0.124 A 2,223 0.124 A 3,657 0.203 A B Street A.Ridge Road between R. B Street& Divided Collector 2D 18,000 DOES NOT EXIST 3,122 0.173 A 3,356 0.186 A 3,577 0.199 A 5,011 0.278 A C Street A.Ridge Road between S. C Street& Divided Collector 2D 18,000 DOES NOT EXIST 464 0.026 A 1,017 0.057 A 1,238 0.069 A 2,672 0.148 A Nichols Road Notes: DU=Dwelling Unit VPD=Vehicles per Day • V/C=Volume to Capacity Ratio U=Undivided,D=Divided • A.Ridge/A.Ranch Rd=Alberhill Ridge/Alberhill Ranch Road • Bold LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on City of Lake Elsinore LOS Standards • Green represents LOS associated with recommended improvements within the roadway segment. Path:N:\3000\209306M2011-2012 Update\Tables\Analysis with Portion of Albarthill Ranch(1191 DU)\3064 Project Trafc Impact Meld.-Roadways 2.21-12.)da Date:2/29/2012 Tab:Roadway Segments Time:3:39 PM LINSCOTT TABLE 5C GREENSPAN PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT MATRIX ROADWAY SEGMENTS(ALL RIDGE PLUS 266 TH DU OF RANCH) ALBERHILL RIDGE, LAKE ELSINORE (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) d R LOS Year 2011 Year 2017 Year 2020 Year 2022 Year 2024 0 Type ,� "Err Existing With With With With of S Capacity with Ranch 266th DU Alberhill Ride Phases 1-4 Alberhill Ride(Phases 1-10) Alberhill Ride hoses 1-14 Alberhill Ride Phases 1-20 No. Roadway Segment Roadway z (VPD) Volume V/C LOS Volume V/C LOS Volume I V/C LOS Volume V/C LOS Volume V/C LOS Lake Street between I-15 SB Ramps& Arterial 2U 18,000 19,984 1.110 F 20,787 1.155 F 22,919 1.273 F 24,408 1.356 F 27,096 1.505 F A. Temescal Canyon Rd Potential Improvement I Arterial 3U 27,000 19,984 0.740 C 20,787 0.770 C 229919 0.849 D 24,408 0.904 E 27,096 1.004 F Potential Improvement 2 Arterial 4D 35,900 19,984 0.557 A 20,787 0.579 A 22,919 0.638 B 24,408 0.680 B 27,096 0.755 C Lake Street between TemescalCanyon Rd& Arterial 2U 18,000 17,722 0.985 E 18,652 1.036 F 20,803 1.156 F 22,348 1.242 F 25,396 1.411 F B. Alberhill Ridge Road Potential improvement 1 Arterial 3U 27,000 17,722 0.656 B 18,652 0.691 B 20,803 0.770 C 22,348 0.828 D 25,396 0.941 E Potential Improvement 2 Arterial 4D 35,900 17,722 0.494 A 18,652 0.520 A 20,803 0.579 A 22,348 0.623 B 25,396 0.707 C Lake Street between Alberhill Ridge Road& Arterial 2U 18,000 17,722 0.985 E 189485 1.027 F 209122 1.118 F 21,350 1.186 F 22,851 1.270 F C. A Street Potential Improvement Arterial 3U 27,000 17,722 0.656 B 18,485 0.685 B 20,122 0.745 C 21,350 0.791 C 22,851 0.846 D Potential Improvement 2 Arterial 4D 35,900 17,722 0.494 A 18,485 0.515 A 20,122 0.561 A 21,350 0.595 A 22,851 0.637 B Lake Street between A Street& Arterial 2U 18,000 17,722 0.985 E 18,485 1.027 F 20,122 1.118 F 20,964 1.165 F 22,533 1.252 F D. B Street Potential Improvement Arterial 3U 27,000 17,722 0.656 B 18,485 0.685 B 20,122 0.745 C 20,964 0.776 C 22,533 0.835 D Potential Improvement 2 Arterial 4D 35,900 17,722 0.494 A 18,485 0.515 A 20,122 0.561 A 20,964 0.584 A 22,533 0.628 B Lake Street between B Street& Arterial 2U 18,000 17,722 0.985 E 18,485 1.027 F 20,230 1.124 F 21,466 1.193 F 23,035 1.280 F E. C Street Potential Improvement I Arterial 3U 27,000 17,722 0.656 B 18,485 0.685 B 20,230 0.749 C 21,466 0.795 C 23,035 0.853 D Potential Improvement 2 Arterial 4D 35,900 17,722 0.494 A 18,485 0.515 A 20,230 0.564 A 21,466 0.598 A 23,035 0.642 B Lake Street between C Street& Arterial 2U 18,000 17,722 0.985 E 18,355 1.020 F 20,062 1.115 F 21,298 1.183 F 22,867 1.270 F F. Nichols Road Potential Improvement Arterial 3U 27,000 17,722 1 0.656 B 18,355 0.680 B 20,062 0.743 C 21,298 0.789 C 22,867 0.847 D Potential Improvement 2 Arterial 4D 35,900 17,722 0.494 A 18,355 0.511 A 20,062 0.559 A 21,298 0.593 A 22,867 0.637 B Lake Street between Nichols Road& Arterial 2U 18,000 17,422 0.968 E 18,982 1.055 F 20,844 1.158 F 22,075 1.226 F 24,199 1.344 F G. Alberhill Ranch Road Potential Improvement I Arterial 3U 27,000 17,422 0.645 B 18,982 0.703 C 20,844 0.772 C 22,075 0.818 D 24,199 0.896 D Potential Improvement 2 Arterial 4D 35,900 17,422 0.485 A 18,982 0.529 A 20,844 0.581 A 22,075 0.615 B 24,199 0.674 B Lake Street between Alberhill Ranch Road& Arterial 2U 18,000 14,824 0.824 D 18,706 1.039 F 20,404 1.134 F 21,524 1.196 F 23,540 1.308 F H. Mountain Street Potential improvement 1 Arterial 3U 27,000 14,824 0.549 A 18,706 0.693 B 20,404 0.756 C 21,524 0.797 C 23,540 0.872 D Potential Improvement 2 Arterial 4D 35,900 14,824 0.413 A 18,706 0.521 A 20,404 0.568 A 21,524 0.600 A 23,540 0.656 B Nichols Road between I. Lake Street& Arterial 2U 18,000 UNDER CONSTRUCTION 2,631 0.146 A 2,957 0.164 A 3,139 0.174 A 3,799 0.211 A A.Ridge/A.Ranch Rd Nichols Road between 1. A.Ridge/A.Ranch Rd& Arterial 2U 19,000 DOES NOT EXIST 4,127 0.229 A 4,507 0.250 A 4,721 0.262 A 5,586 0.310 A Terra Cotta Road Nichols Road between K. Terra Cotta Road& Arterial 2U 18.000 DOES NOT EXIST 4,127 0.229 A 4,507 0.250 A 4,721 0.262 A 5,586 0.310 A Pierce Street Nichols Road between L. Pierce Street& Arterial 2U 19,000 DOES NOT EXIST 4,127 0.229 A 5,775 0.321 A 5,989 0.333 A 6,854 0.381 A Collier Road A.Ridge Road between M. Lake Street& Divided Collector 2D 18,000 DOES NOT EXIST 166 0.009 A 745 0.041 A 1,062 0.059 A 3,931 0.218 A A Street A Street between N. Lake Street& Collector 2U 13.000 DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST 576 0.044 A 830 0.064 A Alberhill Ridge Road B Street between 0. Lake Street& Collector 2U 13,000 DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST 658 0.051 A 1,051 0.081 A 1,051 0.081 A Alberhill Ridge Road C Street between P. Lake Street& Collector 2U 13.000 DOES NOT EXIST 4,053 0.312 A 4,081 0.314 A 4,081 0.314 A 4,081 0.314 A Alberhill Ridge Road A.Ridge Road between Q. A Street& Divided Collector 2D 18,000 DOES NOT EXIST 1,644 0.091 A 2,223 0.124 A 2,223 0.124 A 3,657 0.203 A B Street A.Ridge Road between R. B Street& Divided Collector 2D 18.000 DOES NOT EXIST 3,122 0.173 A 3,356 0.186 A 3,577 0.199 A 5,011 0.278 A C Street A.Ridge Road between S. C Street& Divided Collector 2D 18,000 DOES NOT EXIST 464 0.026 A 1,017 0.057 A 1,238 0.069 A 2,672 0.148 A Nichols Road Notes DU=Dwelling Unit • VPD=Vehicles per Day • V/C=Volume to Capacity Ratio • U=Undivided,D=Divided • A.Ridge/A.Ranch Rd=Alberhill Ridge/Alberhill Ranch Road • Bold LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on City of Lake Elsinore LOS Standards Path:N:\3000\209306M2011-2012 Update\Tables\Analysis without Alberhill Ranch(266 DU)\3064 Project Traffic Impact Matrix-Roadways 2-21-12.,da Dale:2/29/2012 Tab:Roadway Segments Time:3:40 PM LINSCOTT TABLE 6A PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT MATRIX GREENSPAN INTERSECTIONS(ALL RIDGE PLUS ALL RANCH) ALBERHILL RIDGE, LAKE ELSINORE (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Year 2017 Year 2017 with Year 2020 Year 2020 with Year 2022 Year 2022 with Year 2024 Year 2024 with Year 2011 with Alberhill Ranch(1,191"DU)& with Alberhill Ranch(1,612'DU)& with Alberhill Ranch(1,612th DU)& with Alberhill Ranch(1,612th DU)& Existing Alberhill Ranch(1,191"DU)& Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-4) Alberhill Ranch(1,612th DU)& Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-10) Alberhill Ranch(1,612th DU)& Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-14) Alberhill Ranch(1,612th DU)& Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-20) Time (with Ranch 2661h DU) Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-4) with Mitigation Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-10) with Mitigation Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-14) with Mitigation Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-20) with Mitigation No. Intersection Period Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS 1. Lake Street at AM 22.7 C 19.1 B 24.0 C 30.2 C 40.7 D I-15 Northbound Ramps PM 15.0 B 17.4 B -- 19.0 B 20.5 C 23.5 C 2. Lake Street at AM 10.6 B 28.4 C 6.7 A 7.9 A 9.2 A 11.1 B I-15 Southbound Ramps PM 89.1 F 72.5 E 4.7 A 4.7 A 4.7 A 4.7 A 3. Lake Street at AM 17.1 B 28.1 C -- 14.1 B 14.7 B 15.6 B Temescal Canyon Road PM 1 19.2 B 39.8 D 15.2 B 16.5 B 19.5 B 4 Lake Street at AM DOES NOT EXIST 21.0 C 16.3 C 18.0 C 28.4 D Alberhill Ridge Road PM 12.0 B 11.5 B 11.6 B 29.6 D -- 5 Lake Street at AM DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST 20.9 C 44.1 E 32.3 D A Street PM 15.7 C 19.9 C 19.4 C 6 Lake Street at AM DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST 53.0 F 6.1 A 8.2 A 8.2 A -- B Street PM 33.0 D 10.6 B 11.2 B 11.8 B 7. Lake Street at AM DOES NOT EXIST 22.6 C 14.9 B -- 15.4 C 16.0 C C Street PM 12.1 B 10.7 B 10.9 B 11.2 B 8. Lake Street at AM 10.0 A 29.0 C 17.7 B 18.7 B 19.4 B Nichols Road PM 9.9 A 23.4 C 16.3 B 16.9 B 17.5 B -- 9. Lake Street at AM 7.4 A 14.4 B 15.2 B 15.8 B 16.7 B 10.9 B Alberhill Ranch Road PM 15.1 B 33.1 C 42.0 D 48.7 D 58.8 E 46.2 D 10. Lake Street at AM 15.1 B 18.0 B 19.1 B 19.9 B 21.2 C -- Mountain Street PM 12.0 B 12.3 B 13.1 B 13.2 B 13.5 B 11. Lake Street/Grand Avenue at AM 20.4 C 20.4 C 23.1 C 23.6 C 24.2 C Lakeshore Drive PM 18.9 B 19.9 B 23.3 C 23.9 C 24.5 C 12. A.Ridge/A.Ranch Rd at AM UNDER CONSTRUCTION 11.4 B 11.5 B 11.6 B 11.8 B Nichols Road PM 9.9 A 9.8 A 9.7 A 10.1 B 13. Terra Cotta Road at AM DOES NOT EXIST 14.1 B 16.4 C 17.4 C 19.5 C Nichols Road PM 15.9 C 19.5 C 22.1 C 34.5 D Pierce Street at AM 8.0 A 7.9 A 7.8 A 14. DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST Nichols Road PM 5.7 A -- 5.7 A 5.6 A 15. Collier Avenue at AM 8.8 A 15.4 C 29.6 D 26.1 C 28.1 C 30.4 C Nichols Road PM 8.9 A 20.4 C 144.1 F 21.6 C 22.6 C 24.8 C 16. I-15 Southbound Ramps at AM 9.0 A 11.4 B 12.4 B -- 12.6 B 12.8 B Nichols Road PM 11.4 B 13.8 B 18.3 B 18.8 B 52.8 D -- 17 I-15 Northbound Ramps at AM 13.0 B 15.6 I B -- -- 17.0 B -- -- 17.2 B 17.4 B 16.6 B Nichols Road PM 1 73.1 1 F 27.0 C 45.2 D I 50.2 D 58.0 E 41.4 D 18 Alberhill Ridge Road at AM DOES NOT EXIST 7.3 A 7.6 A 7.6 A 7.8 A -- A Street PM 7.6 A 7.9 A 7.9 A 8.5 A 19. Alberhill Ridge Road at AM DOES NOT EXIST 7.3 A 7.5 A 7.6 A 7.8 A Street PM 7.9 A -- -- 8.1 A -- -- 8.2 A -- 8.8 A 20 Alberhill Ridge Road at AM DOES NOT EXIST 7.1 A -- -- 7.3 A -- -- 7.5 A -- 7.7 A C Street PM 8.5 A 8.6 A 8.7 A 9.4 A Notes: • DU=Dwelling Unit • s/v=seconds per vehicle(delay) • A.Ridge/A.Ranch Rd=Alberhill Ridge/Alberhill Ranch Road • Bold LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on City of Lake Elsinore LOS Standards Path:N:\3000\2093064\2011-2012 Update\Tables\3064 Project Traffic Impact Matrix-Intemections.xls Date:2/29/2012 Tab:Intersections Time:3:37 PM LINSCOTT TABLE 613 PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT MATRIX GREENSPAN INTERSECTIONS (ALL RIDGE PLUS 1191 ST DU OF RANCH) ALBERHILL RIDGE, LAKE ELSINORE (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Year 2017 Year 2017 with Year 2020 Year 2020 with Year 2022 Year 2022 with Year 2024 Year 2024 with Year 2011 with Alberhill Ranch(1,191"DU)& with Alberhill Ranch(1,190 DU)& with Alberhill Ranch(1,191st DU)& with Alberhill Ranch(1,191"DU)& Existing Alberhill Ranch(1,191"DU)& Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-4) Alberhill Ranch(1,191at DU)& Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-10) Alberhill Ranch(1,1915t DU)& Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-14) Alberhill Ranch(1,190 DU)& Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-20) Time (with Ranch 2661h DU) Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-4) with Mitigation Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-10) with Mitigation Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-14) with Mitigation Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-20) with Mitigation No. Intersection Period Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS 1. Lake Street at AM 22.7 C 19.1 B 24.0 C 30.2 C 40.7 D I-15 Northbound Ramps PM 15.0 B 17.4 B -- 19.0 B 20.5 C 23.5 C 2. Lake Street at AM 10.6 B 28.4 C 6.7 A 7.9 A 9.2 A 11.1 B I-15 Southbound Ramps PM 89.1 F 72.5 E 4.7 A 4.7 A -- 4.7 A 4.7 A 3. Lake Street at AM 17.1 B 28.1 C -- 38.7 D 27.1 C 34.5 C 46.2 D Temescal Canyon Road PM 19.2 B 39.8 D 59.3 E 14.9 B 16.2 B 19.0 B -- 4 Lake Street at AM DOES NOT EXIST 21.0 C 30.3 D -- 43.0 E 16.4 C 27.3 D 28.0 D Alberhill Ridge Road PM 12.0 B 15.1 C 15.4 C 12.7 B 84.7 F 28.9 D 5 Lake Street at AM DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST 37.2 E 20.5 C 49.3 E 31.6 D A Street PM 25.7 D 23.4 C 35.0 E 19.2 C 6 Lake Street at AM DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST 67.0 F 11.7 B 17.3 B -- 19.5 B 19.4 B B Street PM 72.0 F 44.0 D 54.3 D 67.9 E 5.0 A 7. Lake Street at AM DOES NOT EXIST 22.6 C 29.1 D -- 31.9 D 35.5 E 14.3 B C Street PM 12.1 B 12.9 B 13.6 B 14.5 B 10.7 B 8. Lake Street at AM 10.0 A 29.0 C 33.6 C 39.2 D 45.8 D -- Nichols Road PM 9.9 A 23.4 C 26.7 C 30.3 C 35.1 D -- 9. Lake Street at AM 7.4 A 14.4 B 15.2 B 15.8 B 16.7 B 10.9 B Alberhill Ranch Road PM 15.1 B 33.1 C 41.3 D 47.9 D 58.0 E 45.7 D 10. Lake Street at AM 15.1 B 18.0 B 19.1 B 19.9 B 21.2 C -- Mountain Street PM 12.0 B 12.3 B 13.1 B 13.2 B 13.5 B 11. Lake Street/Grand Avenue at AM 20.4 C 20.4 C 22.2 C 22.5 C 23.0 C Lakeshore Drive PM 18.9 B 19.9 B 22.2 C 22.7 C 23.3 C 12. UNDER CONSTRUCTION A.Ridge/A.Ranch Rd at AM 11.4 B 11.5 B 11.6 B 11.7 B Nichols Road PM 9.9 A 9.9 A 9.8 A 10.1 B 13. Terra Cotta Road at AM DOES NOT EXIST 14.1 B 15.3 C 16.1 C 17.7 C Nichols Road PM 15.9 C 18.1 C 19.8 C 26.5 D Pierce Street at AM 12.1 B 12.6 B 12.3 B 14. DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST Nichols Road PM 10.0 A -- 10.1 B 10.3 B 15. Collier Avenue at AM 8.8 A 15.4 C 19.1 C 21.5 C 22.8 C 24.3 C Nichols Road PM 8.9 A 20.4 C 35.7 E 19.9 B 20.6 C 22.1 C 16. I-15 Southbound Ramps at AM 9.0 A 11.4 B 11.8 B -- 12.0 B 12.1 B Nichols Road PM 11.4 B 13.8 B 15.7 B 16.1 B 16.5 B 17 I-15 Northbound Ramps at AM 13.0 B 15.6 B 16.3 B 16.3 B 16.5 B Nichols Road PM 73.1 F 27.0 C -- -- 35.4 D -- -- 39.1 D -- 44.8 D 18 Alberhill Ridge Road at AM DOES NOT EXIST 7.3 A 7.6 A 7.6 A 7.8 A A Street PM 7.6 A 7.9 A 7.9 A 8.5 A 19. Alberhill Ridge Road at AM DOES NOT EXIST 7.3 A 7.5 A 7.6 A 7.8 A treet PM 7.9 A -- -- 8.1 A -- -- 8.2 A -- 8.8 A 20 Alberhill Ridge Road at AM DOES NOT EXIST 7.1 A -- -- 7.3 A -- -- 7.5 A -- 7.7 A C Street PM 8.5 A 8.6 A 8.7 A 9.4 A Notes: • DU=Dwelling Unit • s/v=seconds per vehicle(delay) • A.Ridge/A.Ranch Rd=Alberhill Ridge/Alberhill Ranch Road • Bold LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on City of Lake Elsinore LOS Standards Path:N:\3000\2093064\2011-2012 Update\TabIWAralysis with Portion of Alberthill Ranch(1191 DU)\3084 Project Traffic Impact Matrix-Intersections 2-15-12.xls Date:2/29/2012 Tab:Intersections Time:3:38 PM LINSCOTT TABLE 6C PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT MATRIX GREENSPAN INTERSECTIONS (ALL RIDGE PLUS 266 TH DU OF RANCH) ALBERHILL RIDGE, LAKE ELSINORE (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Year 2011 Year 2017 Year 2017 with Year 2020 Year 2020 with Year 2022 Year 2022 with Year 2024 Year 2024 with Existing with Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-4) with Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-10) with Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-14) with Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-20) Time (with Ranch 2661h Din Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-4) with Mitigation Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-10) with Mitigation Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-14) with Mitigation Alberhill Ridge(Phases 1-20) with Mitigation No. Intersection Period Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS Delay(s/v) LOS 1. Lake Street at AM 22.7 C 22.6 C 30.1 D 39.9 E 21.5 C 25.4 C I-15 Northbound Ramps PM 15.0 B 14.9 B -- 17.2 C 19.7 C 18.4 B 20.8 C 2. Lake Street at AM 10.6 B 10.2 B 21.7 C 25.7 D 29.5 D 5.1 A 7.0 A I-15 Southbound Ramps PM 89.1 F 131.8 F 16.0 C 17.5 C 18.9 C 2.5 A 2.5 A -- 3. Lake Street at AM 17.1 B 18.1 B -- 22.6 C 28.5 C -- 37.4 D 26.6 C Temescal Canyon Road PM 19.2 B 25.0 C 34.4 C 47.8 D 74.5 E 15.7 B 4 Lake Street at AM DOES NOT EXIST 16.0 C 20.6 C 25.9 D 42.1 E 19.7 C Alberhill Ridge Road PM 10.7 B 12.6 B 12.9 B 42.2 E 19.9 C 5 Lake Street at AM DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST 23.2 C 37.7 E 27.7 D A Street PM 18.5 C 25.0 C 24.3 C 6 Lake Street at AM DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST 31.3 D 8.6 A 12.2 B 12.6 B -- B Street PM 41.2 E 22.7 C 28.6 C 36.9 D 7 Lake Street at AM DOES NOT EXIST 16.4 C 19.4 C -- 20.8 C 22.5 C C Street PM 10.8 B 11.4 B 12.0 B 12.7 B 8. Lake Street at AM 10.0 A 16.9 B 19.2 B 20.6 C 22.7 C Nichols Road PM 9.9 A 17.6 B 19.3 B 20.9 C 25.2 C 9. Lake Street at AM 7.4 A 6.2 A 6.7 A 7.1 A 7.8 A 4.5 A Alberhill Ranch Road PM 15.1 B 27.3 C 37.4 D 46.3 D 63.7 E 38.2 D 10. Lake Street at AM 15.1 B 17.2 B 18.4 B 19.1 B 20.2 C -- Mountain Street PM 12.0 B 12.3 B 12.5 B 12.7 B 13.4 B 11. Lake Street/Grand Avenue at AM 20.4 C 20.8 C 22.4 C 22.4 C 22.7 C Lakeshore Drive PM 18.9 B 19.5 B 21.6 C 22.1 C 22.8 C 12. A.Ridge/A.Ranch Rd at AM UNDER CONSTRUCTION 10.9 B 11.6 B 12.1 B 12.9 B Nichols Road PM 13.6 B 14.7 B 15.3 C 17.7 C 13. Terra Cotta Road at AM DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST DOES NOT EXIST Nichols Road PM Pierce Street at AM 10.0 A 10.2 B 10.4 B 14. DOES NOT EXIST NOMINAL TRAFFIC NOMINAL TRAFFIC Nichols Road PM E 9.2 A 9.2 A 9.4 A 15. Collier Avenue at AM 8.8 A 10.5 B 11.8 B 12.2 B 12.9 B Nichols Road PM 8.9 A 10.7 B -- 12.2 B 12.7 B 14.9 B 16. I-15 Southbound Ramps at AM 9.0 A 10.4 B 14.4 B 14.7 B 14.7 B 14.8 B Nichols Road PM 11.4 B 16.3 C 16.5 B 18.6 B 19.1 B 19.8 B 17 I-15 Northbound 17.5 B 17.9 B Ramps at AM 13.0 B 24.2 C 16.2 B 17.2 B -- -- Nichols Road PM 73.1 F 457.0 F 24.0 C 30.9 C 34.0 C 39.1 D 18 Alberhill Ridge Road at AM DOES NOT EXIST 7.3 A -- 7.6 A 7.6 A 7.8 A A Street PM 7.6 A 7.9 A 7.9 A 8.5 A 19. Alberhill Ridge Road at AM DOES NOT EXIST 7.3 A 7.5 A 7.6 A 7.8 A B Street PM 7.9 A 8.1 A 8.2 A 8.8 A 20 Alberhill Ridge Road at AM DOES NOT EXIST 7.1 A 7.3 A 7.1 A 7.7 A C Street PM 8.5 A 8.6 A 8.7 A 9.4 A Notes: • DU=Dwelling Unit • s/v=seconds per vehicle(delay) • A.Ridge/A.Ranch Rd=Alberhill Ridge/Alberhill Ranch Road • Bold LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on City of Lake Elsinore LOS Standards Path:N:\3000\2093064\2011-2012 Update\Tables\Analysis without Alberhill Ranch(266 DU)\3064 Project Traffic Impact Matrix-Intersections 2-16-12.xis Date:2/29/2012 Tab:Intersections Time:3:40 PM LINSCOTT TABLE 6D GREENSPAN RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENT COMPARISON SUMMARY TABLE ALBERHILL RIDGE,LAKE ELSINORE Year 2017 Year 2020 Year 2022 Year 2024 All Ridge All Ridge All Ridge All Ridge All Ridge All Ridge All Ridge All Ridge All Ridge All Ridge All Ridge All Ridge plus plus plus plus plus plus plus plus plus plus plus plus No. Intersection All Ranch Ranch 1,191st DU Ranch 266th DU All Ranch Ranch 1,190 DU Ranch 266th DU All Ranch Ranch 1,190 DU Ranch 266th DU All Ranch Ranch 1,191st DU Ranch 266th DU 1. Lake Street at Signalized, Signalized, Signalized I-15 Northbound Ramps NBL,WBL NBL,WBL 2. Lake Street at Signalized, Signalized, I Signalized I-15 Southbound Ramps Free EBR, Free EBR, Free EBR NBR,SBL NBR,SBL 3. Lake Street at NBT, Temescal Canyon Road SBT SBT SBT 4. Lake Street at Stop Controlled, Stop Controlled, Stop Controlled, NBT, NBT NBT, Alberhill Ridge Road add R to NBT, add R to NBT, add R to NBT, SBT SBT SBT SBL,WBL,WBR SBL,WBL,WBR SBL,WBL,WBR 5. Lake Street at Stop Controlled, Stop Controlled, Stop Controlled, SBT, A Street Does Not Exist Does Not Exist Does Not Exist Does Not Exist Does Not Exist Does Not Exist add R to NBT, add R to NBT,NBT, add R to NBT, WBL WBL WBL SBL,WB Sh.LR SBL,WB Sh.LR SBL,WB Sh.LR 6. Lake Street at Signalized, Signalized, Signalized SBT B Street Does Not Exist Does Not Exist Does Not Exist add R to NBT, add R to NBT, add R to NBT, SBL,WB Sh.LR SBL,WB Sh.LR SBL,WB Sh.LR NBT,SBT 7. Lake Street at Stop Controlled, Stop Controlled, Stop Controlled, NBT,SBT NBT C Street add R to NBT, add R to NBT, add R to NBT, WBR WBR, WBR 8. Lake Street at add T to NBR, Nichols Road SBT 9. Lake Street at add T to NBR add T to NBR add T to NBR Alberhill Ranch Road 10. Lake Street at Mountain Avenue 11. Lake Street/Grand Avenue at Lakeshore Drive 12. A.Ridge/A.Ranch Rd Rd at Signalized, Signalized, Stop Controlled, Nichols Road NBL,NB Sh.TR, NBL,NB Sh.TR, NB Sh.LTR, SBL,SB Sh.TR, SBL,SB Sh.TR, SBL,SB Sh.TR, EBL,EB Sh.TR EBL,EB Sh.TR EBL,EB Sh.TR, WBL,WB Sh.TR. WBL,WB Sh.TR WBL,WB Sh.TR 13. Terra Cotta Road at Stop Controlled, Stop Controlled, Nichols Road NBL,NBR, NBL,NBR, Does Not Exist Does Not Exist Does Not Exist Does Not Exist EB Sh.TR, EB Sh.TR, WBL,WBT WBL,WBT 14. Pierce Street at Signalized, Nichols Road Does Not Exist Does Not Exist Does Not Exist add T to NBR, SBL,SB Sh.TR, EBL,add R to WBT 15. Collier Avenue at Signalized, Signalized, Nichols Road WBL WBL 16. I-15 Southbound Ramps at Signalized, Signalized, Signalized Nichols Road SBL SBL 17. I-15 Northbound Ramps at Signalized, Signalized, Signalized WBR Nichols Road NBL NBL 18. Alberhill Ridge at Full Improvement Full Improvement Full Improvement A Street 19. Alberhill Ridge at Full Improvement Full Improvement Full Improvement B Street 20. Alberhill Ridge at Full Improvement Full Improvement Full Improvement C Street -Purple=Alberhill Ranch Improvement -Orange=Alberhill Ridge Improvement Date:2/29/2012 Path: N:\3000\2093064\2011-2012 Update\Tables\3064 Improvements Comparisons.xls Time:3:52 PM vF C°"N r} County of Riverside General Plan - Hearing Draft Circulation Element ' �n Figure C-2 Link/Volume Capacity/Level of Service for Riverside County Roadways Link Volume Capacities/Level of Service for Riverside County Roadwaysm y®®�W �p°�ATION DEQP David E.Barnhart Director of Transportation Number of Maximum Two-Way Traffic Volume(ADT)(2) Roadway Classification Lanes Service Level C Service Level D Service Level E Collector 2 10,400 11,700 13,000 Secondary 4 20,700 23,300 25,900 Major 4 27,300 30,700 34,100 Arterial(') 2 14,400 16,200 18,000 Arterial 4 28,700 32,300 35,900 Mountain Arterial(') 2 12,900 14,500 16,100 Mountain Arterial 3 16,700 18,800 20,900 Mountain Arterial 4 29,800 33,500 37,200 Urban Arterial 4 28,700 32,300 35,900 Urban Arterial 6 43,100 48,500 53,900 Urban Arterial 8 57,400 64,600 71,800 Expressway 4 32,700 36,800 40,900 Expressway 6 49,000 55,200 61,300 Expressway 8 65,400 73,500 81,700 Freeway 4 61,200 68,900 76,500 Freeway 6 94,000 105,800 117,500 Freeway 8 128,400 144,500 160,500 Freeway 10 160,500 180,500 200,600 Ramp(4) 1 16,000 18,000 20,000 Notes: (1)All capacity figures are based on optimum conditions and are intended as guidelines for planning purposes only. (2)Maximum two-way ADT values are based on the 1999 Modified Highway Capacity Manual Level of Service Tables as defined in the Riverside County Congestion Management Program. (3)Two-lane roadways designated as future arterials that conform to arterial design standards for vertical and horizontal alignment are analyzed as arterials. (4)Ramp capacity is given as a one-way traffic volume. Revised.•March 2001 Chapter 4 Page C-11 TFMFS Cq� O C tv /V O \ (04 i. ... 'q'........ .... / G .... F�..............� O ................g�..'.. ..............� .'.'.'..'Aid..........'.'...��.... . p ...... �,............... D ....'.'.m '.'............F'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'..... 6 :.' R '.. ' 20 ...... 1 \ O ........'....'.. O......, \ E \ \ 7 ..........v..'.'.'.'.'� \ �....... ........ ..... 8 ,yj�......... , :_:..I ....... ........ .. 12 o .::::::.. 13 ;�;.:.:::::...14 ......� 16 ............ ...............� .......:::: ... _--J...::::::::0 ..................... .......::. ....... .. O G �........ ....... J ... — 15 :::::::::::::::: ....... I; U :.a Og FR///G�:..... ::::•:a...:::::::::::::I........:]]� � coo 0 .::::::.....::.. : E / ...... ......... •.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.• :::::::::::: �.... ... / y 9 H ::::::�--f LF o / a cA I / MOUNTAIN 10 -l-------------•'I N 11 � J D �9 z F i 0 M / Q� 3 3 I m 6 a ST � 0 N N E N U N I / O I'7 O N O 0 O C KEY - = EXISTING ROADWAYS ALBERHILL RIDGE PROJECT SITE FIGURE LAW & e � = ALBERHILL RIDGE ROADWAYS ALBERHILL RANCH PROJECT SITE EENSPANtNO = FUTURE ROADWAYS '' • SCALE = ALBERHILL RIDGE 400 BOUNDARY XX = STUDY INTERSECTION = ALBERHILL RANCH BOUNDARY VICINITY MAP ---- = BRIGHTON SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY ❑X = ROADWAY SEGMENT ALBERHILL RIDGE, LAKE ELSINORE / COpN1Y OF R/IiERS/pE- U 5 EREE�P� \ TA TEE PATE PApk O Cp ry E Ir�TER51P�E — — — L/N of RivERsipE C / O N I N I N cpNN7Y / R/HERS/pE- u�Roc O �00 tE�ESGPL ���4r O GEG� R _ _ I o tE CREED `�8,��PAR-h B \ 3 -o N C4STLE&.COO,yL-/NC `� a� Q \ M /'AC/F/C CLAY PRODUCTS/NC, \ t A COpN / -0 d m AY ^m O �. °ppers No _ N e9 EXISTING E �� — ,.�a+xrnm �EIpNTIo kE STRE � U N&lSiN ET � 'SAC/F/C CLAY PRO PAC/F/c L, DUCTS/NC L-9Y PRODUCT — — O TRACT 1B ALBERH/CL q OOKE O C//y PARK4,q ANCH O LINSCOTT SOURCE: KWC ENGINEERS = FIGURE 2 KEY = PHASE BOUNDARY (&NO SCALE PROPOSED SITE PLAN ALBERHILL RIDGE, LAKE ELSINORE MFscq< \ I NOT EXIST \ _ ONE—WAY \ ONE—WAY \ 3 PHASE 4\\ Cq/NV O —STOP O —STOP O —SIGNAL O \ P� LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® LAKE ST O 1-15 NB RAMPS 1-15 SIB RAMPS TEMESCAL ALBERHILL RIDGE RD -c CANYON RD o I �--�- / O i-- �.,..,..,� / \ - ................... '(/ ....`� -`� / DOES \ / DOES \ / DOES .. ``�.� I NOT \ NOT NOT I \ O EXIST I \ EXIST \ EXIST I y..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'�.T.�! \\ / \\ // \\ // \ 5 PHASE N :.:.P:..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.. !!' 19 % O � \ —SIGNAL _ / r 5 ``� LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® LAKE ST 7 1 O ................ ....:.:.:.:.:.:. .p�.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .�� A ST B ST C ST NICHOLS RD N �.............'.Ro'.:.:....�' .'......... •..F..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.:.:.� \ \\ O .... 20' '' '. 1 / \ \ UNDER I C 1 I CONSTRUCTIONrl\I T 1 \ / I 8 N/CyOZ.'.:.:.:� 's •` \ 3 PHASE \\ 5 PHASE \ \ / I O O O O \ 8 PHASE O \ / ....'.............. 9 —SIGNAL 10 SIGNAL 11 SIGNAL 12 — o �.................... o \ 12 17 Rp LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® LAKE ST/GRAND AV ® ALBERHILL RIDGE RD/ j ALBERHILL RANCH RD MOUNTAIN AVE LAKESHORE DR ALBERHILL RANCH RD I .......:::.o ..::..:... 13 :::14 .....j 16 NICHOLS RD a..•:::.•:::.•.•::.•.•:::.•:: . ........ .... 1 ........ ... �0 15. ................... / DOES DOES / \ Q .:.:.::.:.� o� NOT NOT s / :.: :::::::::::: : :::::::'::: ::: EXIST / \ EXIST • � ��" /yam \ / \ -i / o . :.:::..::..: ....<25.: . / (� \ / \ / \ ONE—WAY \ ALL—WAY L / e::.:::.:::..::..:....... .. /on 13 — 14 — 15 — STOP 16 -- — STOP TERRA COTTA RD ® PIERCE ST ® COLLIER AVE ® 1-15 SB RAMPS / NICHOLS RD NICHOLS RD NICHOLS RD NICHOLS RD 10 :I MOUNTAIN 2U .. ................................ (25 c�ro / Qoo 11 / o DOES \ / DOES \ / DOES \ 0 O NOT NOT NOT o 4D \ / \ EXIST / \ EXIST / \ EXIST (45) \ \ / / \ / o > ONE—WAY <iyco o �q��S 17 � — STOP i <� yOQF 1-15 NB RAMPS ® ALBERHILL RIDGE ® ALBERHILL RIDGE ® ALBERHILL RIDGE NICHOLS RD A STREET B STREET C STREET ILIr KEY FIGURE 3 c:-.-.� _ = EXISTING ROADWAYS �:�::•.� — ALBERHILL RIDGE PROJECT SITE (XX)= POSTED SPEED LIMIT (MPH) = ALBERHILL RIDGE ROADWAYS — __ U = UNDIVIDED, D = DIVIDED ALBERHILL RANCH PROJECT SITE EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS b " " 'a = APPROACH LANE ASSIGNMENT weI�NO = FUTURE ROADWAYS �� 2 = NUMBER OF TRAVEL LANES SCALE = ALBERHILL RIDGE 400 BOUNDARY : OL = OVERLAP PHASE = ALBERHILL RANCH BOUNDARY BOUNDARY = TRAFFIC SIGNAL, = STOP SIGN AND INTERSECTION CONTROLS p = PARKING, NP = NO PARKING ®-® ---- = BRIGHTON SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY ALBERHILL RIDGE, LAKE ELSINORE IsIn a `A3 3 CgNyON O \ -SIGNAL PHASE O \ -SIGNAL PHASE O \ SIGNALSE O\ —STOP ONE-WAY \ p� LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® LAKE ST O 1-15 NB RAMPS 1-15 SB RAMPS TEMESCAL ALBERHILL RIDGE RD CANYON RD 17 ::::........ ... 18 :::. X"\ 3 ��'�`y.:::::.:::::.::::::::::::... \\ ONE-WAY SE \\ ONE-WAY \\ 5 PHASE P :..:..:.. -STOP O —SIGNAL O STOP O —SIGNAL I 7 1 O5 c�( ...� LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® N ............:.. A ST B ST C ST NICHOLS RD N '''''''''''''' ............... .i — \ c.....5 ...... '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'� �. / C /XA \ \ / 7 0.....� \ / I $ /Cyr':'.'.':'.' 'f \ 3 PHASE \ 5 PHASE \ 8 PHASE E J O a 9 -SIGNAL 10 SIGNAL 11 SIGNAL 12 —SIGNAL i O O O O a / . •• d..:::..::..:::.::... 3 \i \ LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® LAKE ST/GRAND AV 0 ALBERHILL RIDGE RD/ o \ I \ 12 ;;;;;;;;; ;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;;;; ;;; 17 Rp ALBERHILL RANCH RD MOUNTAIN AVE LAKESHORE DR ALBERHILL RANCH RD :.. .... ,,.......... 16 NICHOLS RD 1 I ::::::::::0 13 14 ....j .........:.....:::... .............. : :.; 15 ...... ...............Q..............."I.....................::::: :::1, / :":":":"r _-ONE-WAY 14 \\ —SIGNAL SIGNAL 2 PHASE 15\ _ 16\ _ 3 PHASE / /oc� STOP cv ••''I TERRA COTTA RD ® PIERCE ST ® COLLIER AVE ® 1-15 SB RAMPS ® o ::"' /a. NICHOLS RD NICHOLS RD NICHOLS RD NICHOLS RD N 10 . ............................ MOUNTAIN ...... o •— y r) I I a < \ 3 PHASE \ ALL-WAY \\ ALL-WAY \ ALL-WAY o0 z 9�S 17 \ SIGNAL 18 —STOP 19 —STOP 20 —STOP j FyORF 1-15 NB RAMPS ® ALBERHILL RIDGE ® ALBERHILL RIDGE ® ALBERHILL RIDGE 04 NICHOLS RD A STREET B STREET C STREET KEY FIGURE 4A O = EXISTING ROADWAYS = ALBERHILL RIDGE PROJECT SITE � = EXISTING LANE ASSIGNMENT LAW & = ALBERHILL RIDGE ROADWAYS = ALBERHILL RANCH PROJECT SITE = PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS FOR ALBERHILL RIDGE (YEAR 2017/2020/2022/2024) = FUTURE ROADWAYS EZ e YEAR 2017 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS YEAR 2017/2020/2022/2024 N = ALBERHILL RIDGE 400 BOUNDARY = TRAFFIC SIGNAL,: = STOP SIGN = YEAR 2020 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS = ALBERHILL RANCH BOUNDARY F = FREE RIGHT = YEAR 2 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS ( ) (ALL RIDGE PLUS ALL RANCH) NO SCALE ®®® �- = PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY ALBERHILL RANCH COA YEAR 2017 =_ ---- = BRIGHTON SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY OL = OVERLAP PHASE o— - = PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY ALBERHILL RANCH COA (BUILDOUT YEAR 2020) ALBERHILL RIDGE, LAKE ELSINORE IsIn 3 PHA CANYON O \ —SIGNAL PHASE O\\ —SIGNAL PHASE O \ SIGNALSE O\\ —ONE—WAY STOP \ p� LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® LAKE ST 2 I-15 NB RAMPS I-15 SB RAMPS TEMESCAL ALBERHILL RIDGE RD CANYON RD —-':':':::':':':':: '•.•'• •�:':':�� ``\`�\ i �`,,./ � X__ P y ..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'... ••% ONE—WAY SE Y \ 5 PHASE N—STOP O —SIGNAL O O —SIGNAL I 1.9 .'...........'�5 ................... .� LAKE ST A ST ® LAKE ST ST ® LAKE ST ST ® LAKE NICHOLS ST RD cl 7 1 0 .'...::..:':':':':':':':' '.':':':':':'.:moo':'':':':':':':':':'.'.. . N ... Ot 70 J 3 PHASE 10 \ 5 PHASE 11 \` 8 PHASE 12XE 3 S.'.. —SIGNAL SIGNAL —SIGNAL SIGNAL a .i ' LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® LAKE ST/GRAND AV 0 ALBERHILL RIDGE RD/ o \\ 12 I' 17 Rp ALBERHILL RANCH RD MOUNTAIN AVE LAKESHORE DR ALBERHILL RANCH RD \1 :.::::::::::::::... •:....•::... 13 �� 14 16 NICHOLS RD ::::::::::::::...�.......:::.:... I ............::..:::.::. .::..:::.:::.::.. 0 \ .:::..::..::............ .................. 0 15 /I q�eFRN/Gz:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:. :.:a::..:•::::•:::..: :. r / m °°<<, 1 =► I I ii i � �� `d ' r / ............... .............: ..:....:.'•; / •:r / y 9GF 13 \ _—ONE—WAY 14 \\ —ONE—WAY 15\ _ / 16\ _ 3 PHASE / STOP STOP SIGNAL cv TERRA COTTA RD ® PIERCE ST ® COLLIER AVE ® I-15 SB RAMPS ® 0 NICHOLS RD NICHOLS RD NICHOLS RD NICHOLS RD `V 10 . MOUNTAIN ..�_--._.._..__._....�;/ — — — _ 0 . ................................... X \ / Xal1 \ 0 c� \ F�Z�/S 0 a < 17 E _ ALL—WAY \ _ ALL—WAY 20 \ _ ALL—WAY'�'CZO O STOP O STOP 0 STOP °�� Fy°Q�c I-15 NB RAMPS ® ALBERHILL RIDGE ® ALBERHILL RIDGE ® ALBERHILL RIDGE NICHOLS RD A STREET B STREET C STREET KEY A LINSCOTT = EXISTING ROADWAYS = ALBERHILL RIDGE PROJECT SITE = EXISTING LANE ASSIGNMENT FIGURE 4B LAW = ALBERHILL RIDGE ROADWAYS = ALBERHILL RANCH PROJECT 1191st DU �® PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS FOR ALBERHILL RIDGE (2017/2020/2022/2024) = FUTURE ROADWAYS e o— — = YEAR 2017 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS YEAR 2017/2020/2022/2024 N = ALBERHILL RIDGE 400 BOUNDARY = TRAFFIC SIGNAL,: = STOP SIGN f- = YEAR 2020 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS ® = ALBERHILL RANCH BOUNDARY F = FREE RIGHT = YEAR 2022 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS (ALL RIDGE PLUS 1191ST DU OF RANCH) NO SCALE ®® = YEAR 2024 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS =_ ---- = BRIGHTON SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY OL = OVERLAP PHASE �- = PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY ALBERHILL RANCH COA (YEAR 2017) ALBERHILL RIDGE, LAKE ELSINORE IsIn CANYON O SIGNAL\\ SE O\\ 2 PHASE \ 3 PHASE \ ONE-WAY 2 -SIGNAL O \ -SIGNAL O —STOP \ p� LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® LAKE ST 2 1-15 NB RAMPS 1-15 SB RAMPS TEMESCAL ALBERHILL RIDGE RD CANYON RD / 04 i l -,r ....:...:::::: CD %� `\ O \ -STOP WAY O\ —SIGNAL PHASE O\ TOP ONE-WAY $ \ —SIGNAL E �I / 5 c�( ``� LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® N 7 1 O .......:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.......:.:.:.:.:.:. .p�.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .�� A ST B ST C ST NICHOLS RD N CD c` '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' \ O \ :'''� 5�:.'.':':'. '.'.'.'.'� of \ / K-1 0 \\ \ `.................. a.i r� I \ �/i / 1 ��� / \ 1 / 3 PHASE O\ 5 PHASE O \ 8 PHASE 12 _TWO-WAY LS.*.'y ;C I 9 -SIGNAL 10 SIGNAL 11 SIGNAL STOP 0� LAKE ST ® LAKE ST ® LAKE ST/GRAND AV 0 ALBERHILL RIDGE RD/ \ I \ 12 I' 17 Rp ALBERHILL RANCH RD MOUNTAIN AVE LAKESHORE DR ALBERHILL RANCH RD ® u 1 Q 13 � 14 J 16 NICHOLS RD I � I �.......... \ / \ o ::: . ........+ ID I m / DOES \� t� ►� / :.qt.. !';;'� Q / �'p NOT : s / ; :• EXIST / ....:::::, J_J-' / \ / :.::.:.I r / 9GF 13 \ — i/ 14 \ —ONE-WAY 15\ _ ONE/WAY 16\ _ 3 PHASE I /oc� O O STOP O STOP O SIGNAL v TERRA COTTA RD ® PIERCE ST ® COLLIER AVE ® 1-15 SB RAMPS ® o // ::•'• ��� NICHOLS RD NICHOLS RD NICHOLS RD NICHOLS RD `V MOUNTAIN 1 ;L_________/ \ \ / o z <q 17 3 PHASE 18 \ _ ALL-WAY 19 \ _ ALL-WAY 20 \ _ ALL-WAY o C �S O \ SIGNAL STOP O STOP O STOP o��° FyOQ�C 1-15 NB RAMPS ® ALBERHILL RIDGE ® ALBERHILL RIDGE ® ALBERHILL RIDGE NICHOLS RD A STREET B STREET C STREET KEY //'`` LINSCOTT = EXISTING ROADWAYS = ALBERHILL RIDGE PROJECT SITE = EXISTING LANE ASSIGNMENT FIGURE 4C LAW = ALBERHILL RIDGE ROADWAYS = ALBERHILL RANCH PROJECT 266th DU o—® PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS FOR ALBERHILL RIDGE (2017/2020/2022/2024) = FUTURE ROADWAYSe o— - = YEAR 2017 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS YEAR 2017/2020/2022/2024 N = ALBERHILL RIDGE 400 BOUNDARY = TRAFFIC SIGNAL,: = STOP SIGN = YEAR 2020 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS = ALBERHILL RANCH BOUNDARY F = FREE RIGHT a— = YEAR 2022 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS (ALL RIDGE PLUS 266TH DU OF RANCH) NO SCALE ®®® = YEAR 2024 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS =_ ---- = BRIGHTON SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY OL = OVERLAP PHASE f® = PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY ALBERHILL RANCH COA (YEAR 2017) ALBERHILL RIDGE, LAKE ELSINORE INTERSECTION EXISTING ALL RIDGE PLUS ALL r RIDGE PLUS ALL RIDGE PLUS ALL RANCH 1,191 DU OF RANCH 266Y DU OF RANCH CD LAKE ST 1-15 NB RAMPS \ \ \ \ ONE-WAY STOP 3 PHASE SIGNAL 3 PHASE SIGNAL 3 PHASE SIGNAL LAKE ST ® F I F I F F 1-15 SB RAMPS \ \ \ \ ONE-WAY STOP 3 PHASE SIGNAL 3 PHASE SIGNAL 2 PHASE SIGNAL .di* \I LAKE ST ® TEMESCAL CANYON RD \ \ \ \ 3 PHASE SIGNAL 3 PHASE SIGNAL 3 PHASE SIGNAL 3 PHASE SIGNAL / DOES NOT LAKE ST ® EXIST ALBERHILL RIDGE RD \ \ \ \ ONE-WAY STOP ONE-WAY STOP ONE-WAY STOP 0 5 / DOES NOT LAKE ST ® EXIST A ST \ \ \ \ ONE-WAY STOP ONE-WAY STOP ONE-WAY STOP DOES NOT X_ ' LAKE ST EXIST �/ �/B ST \ 3 PHASE SIGNAL 3 PHASE SIGNAL 3 PHASE SIGNAL N O / N N NDOES N / I NOT \I >►��R. I ��.. I �R. \I o LAKE ST ® EXIST C ST \ \ \ \ ONE-WAY STOP ONE-WAY STOP ONE-WAY STOP LAKE ST ® NICHOLS RD 5 PHASE SIGNAL 5 PHASE SIGNAL 5 PHASE SIGNAL 5 PHASE SIGNAL LAKE ST ® ALBERHILL RANCH RD 3 PHASE SIGNAL 3 PHASE SIGNAL 3 PHASE SIGNAL 3 PHASE SIGNAL N LAKE ST MOUNTAIN AVE \ \ \ \ o 5 PHASE SIGNAL 5 PHASE SIGNAL 5 PHASE SIGNAL 5 PHASE SIGNAL N O O O KEY FIGURE 4D LINSCOTT � = APPROACH LANE ASSIGNMENT • = TRAFFIC SIGNAL LAW & = ALBERHILL RIDGE IMPROVEMENT F = FREE RIGHT ALBERHILL RANCH IMPROVEMENT OL = OVERLAP tNO SCALE RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS (INTERSECTIONS 1 — 10) ALBERHILL RIDGE, LAKE ELSINORE INTERSECTION EXISTING ALL RIDGE PLUS ALL r RIDGE PLUS ALL RIDGE PLUS ALL RANCH 1,191 DU OF RANCH 266Y DU OF RANCH LAKE GRAND AVE ® �tt� \ TT \ TT LAKEKESHORE DR \ � \ � \ � \ � 8 PHASE SIGNAL 8 PHASE SIGNAL 8 PHASE SIGNAL 8 PHASE SIGNAL UNDER V V V ALBERHILL RIDGE RD/ \ CONSTRUCTION ALBERHILL RANCH RD @ J NICHOLS RD \ 2 PHASE SIGNAL 2 PHASE SIGNAL TWO-WAY STOP 13 / DOES DOES \ OEXISTO TERRA COTTA RD ® \ EXIST / \ ��� / \ `� / \ / NICHOLS RD \ \ \ I \ ONE-WAY STOP ONE-WAY STOP 14 / DOES \ / �� NOT I J PIERCE ST ® \ EXIST NICHOLS RD \ \ \ \ 2 PHASE SIGNAL ONE-WAY STOP ONE-WAY STOP COLLIER AVE ® NICHOLS RD \ \ \ \ ONE-WAY STOP 3 PHASE SIGNAL 3 PHASE SIGNAL ONE-WAY STOP I-15 SIB RAMPS® NICHOLS RD \ \ \ \ ALL-WAY STOP 3 PHASE SIGNAL 3 PHASE SIGNAL 3 PHASE SIGNAL N 1-15 NB RAMPS ® NICHOLS RD \ \ \ \ ONE-WAY STOP 3 PHASE SIGNAL 3 PHASE SIGNAL 3 PHASE SIGNAL L 11 18 IDOES I V�, I I I �, NOT I o ALBERHILL RIDGE ® \ EXIST A STREET ALL WAY STOP ALL-WAY STOP ALL-WAY STOP / � o 19 / DOES \ / ► \ / X \ NOT v� ' \ EXIST / \ �� / \ �'� ALBERHILL RIDGE ® B STREET \ \ \ \ ° ° ALL-WAY STOP ALL-WAY STOP ' ALL-WAY STOP N 20 ET \ ALBERHILL RIDGE EXIST � NO C STREET \ o ALL-WAY STOP ALL-WAY STOP ALL-WAY STOP oN O 0 O KEY FIGURE 4E LINSCOTT � = APPROACH LANE ASSIGNMENT • = TRAFFIC SIGNAL LAW & = ALBERHILL RIDGE IMPROVEMENT F = FREE RIGHT ALBERHILL RANCH IMPROVEMENT OL = OVERLAP tNO SCALE RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS (INTERSECTIONS 11-20) ALBERHILL RIDGE, LAKE ELSINORE