HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-29-1986 RDAMINUTES
ADJOURNED CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
130 SOUTH MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 29, 1986
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Adjourned City Council/Redevelopment Agency meeting was called
to order by Mayor Strigotte at 6:30 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Washburn.
3. ROLL CALL
PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: DOMINGUEZ, MATSON, VERMILLION, WINKLER
STRIGOTTE
ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE
PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: BROWN, MELLINGER, WASHBURN
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CALLAHAN, KELLEY
Also present were: Executive Director Molendyk, Assistant City
Manager Gilbert, Community Development Director Miller, Public
Services Director Kirchner and Deputy City Clerk Bryning.
4. BUSINESS MATTERS
Due to the absence of the Consultant, Redevelopment Agency
Annexation Process item "A" was continued.
B. Title 17
1) PUD/Priority of Sections.
Priority of projects were set in the following order:
1. Special Events
2. Flood Prone Overlay
3. Planned Unit Development
4. Central Business District
5. Hillside Planned Development Overlay
6. Lakeshore Overlay
7. Country Club Heights (Area Plan in General Plan
General Objectives and Goals)
S. Antennas
Mr. Miller suggested that a Study Session be set
between the Planning Commission and the City Council to
discuss the Special Events Ordinance. All members
concurred. No date was designated.
7 -
Page two
Adjourned Council/RDA Minutes
October 29, 1986
B. Title 17 - Continued.
2) General Plan Policy (Up -Date)
Commissioner Mellinger reported that the General Plan
needs revision and suggested that Design Guidelines be
implemented and zoning for future annexations be addressed.
It was the consensus of the Council that the Planning
Commission bring back the items from the General Plan that
they would like to see revised.
3) Subdivision/Lot Compatibility
Mr. Matson stated that there is still a problem with lot
compatibility. He stated that he thought no lot size would
be less than 75% of the adjacent lot and that this policy
had been implemented in Title 17.
Mr. Miller stated that he has tentatively scheduled an
amendment for consideration to the R-1 District, which is
the minimum 6,000 square foot, average 7,260 square foot
lots. This will be presented to the December 2, Planning
Commission Meeting for a recommendation to help solve some
of the lot transition problems.
Mr. Strigotte stated that if its not compatible than
Planning Commission should turn it down, and he was under the
impression that it had already been decided that there was
a decision of 75% of the adjacent lot. He stated that he
thought that as the lots went out farther from the core of
the City that the lots would get larger and larger.
He stated that he had given up on the ban zoning idea in lieu
of the 75% lot transition, which was agreed by Council at
that time.
Mr. Winkler stated that he was not under the impression that
the 75% of the adjacent lot was a firm policy. He stated
that he understood it to be a concept to be brought back to
Council.
Mr. Strigotte stated that decisions are taken down by staff
and it should have been noted in the minutes in regard to
the lot compatibility policy set by Council.
There was general discussion in regard to Transitional Lot
Development. Mr. Miller was directed to draft a report to
address this item. Mr. Mellinger suggested that this
should be placed as a General Plan Amendment Policy
Revision and implemented by the Zoning Code.
Mayor Strigotte called for item "A" to be presented at this time.
A. Redevelopment Agency Annexation Process
Mr. Dick Hill, Consultant representing Management Services
Institute, presented a Flow Chart and presentation in
explanation of the Redevelopment Agency Annexation Process.
C. Design Review Development Issues L
1) Design Guidelines
Mr. Mellinger presented Community Design Guidelines for the
developer to use as a tool to place plans with the City for
approval. These Guidelines were developed by the Design
Review Subcommittee.
Mr. Mellinger asked the Council to review the Guidelines
and give in -put to staff for possible final draft.
31
Page three
Adjourned Council/RDA Minutes
October 29, 1986
C. Design Review Development Issues - Continued.
2) Development/Land Use Impacts (Traffic, Flood Control, etc.)
Mr. Washburn introduced the problems with Traffic
Circulation and Flood Control. There was considerable
discussion in regard to traffic impact on various areas
of the City and Flood Control problems including the San
Jacinto River bridge.
Mr. Strigotte questioned the Negative Declarations and asked
the Planning Commissioners to give closer inspection to
Negative Declaration items.
D. Council/Planning Commission
These items were deleted from the Agenda.
5. GENERAL COMMENTS
A Study Session was set between the City Council and the Planning
Commission for January 8, 1987 at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers.
6. ADJOURNMENT
The Adjourned City Council/Redevelopment Agency Meeting was
adjourned at 8:45 p.m.
JOHN MATSON, CHAIRMAN
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Respectfully submitted,
Adria L. Bryn'ing, Dep Cit Clerk