Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Lake Elsinore General Plan - Part 5
Mi cc O) Z3 Co w Z � Q Cc) J Qa �i a City of Lake Elsinore HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE VII. QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVES �ts�w.i��:l.�c..: •�a��•�Ss�i�-^-'-J T.s�-�r�' `^nom �- ... '!a..�"S�O�C.'+L'�P^,-e..:..pe�si'Y^^rJ6'S ?'A� State Housing Law requires that each jurisdiction establish the maximum number of housing units that will be constructed, rehabilitated, and preserved over the planning period. The Quantified Objectives for the Housing Element reflect the planning period from July 1, 1998 to June 30, 2005. It is important to note that while the Quantified Objectives of the RHNA are required to be part of the Housing Element and the City will strive to obtain these objectives, Lake Elsinore cannot guarantee that these needs will be met give limited financial and staff resources, and the increasing gap in affordability of housing resources and incomes. Satisfaction of the City's regional housing needs will partially depend on the cooperation of private funding sources and resources of the State, Federal and County programs that are used to support the needs of the very low, low and moderate income households. Additionally, outside economic forces heavily influence the housing market. State law recognizes that a locality may not be able to accommodate its regional fair share housing need. The Quantified Objectives assume optimum conditions for the production of housing. However, environmental, physical and market conditions exert influence on the timing, type and cost of housing production in a community. A. NEW CONSTRUCTION Table 50 contains the quantified objectives that will be used as guidelines toward meeting the City of Lake Elsinore's new construction objectives for the 1998-2005 planning period, and compares them to the fair share established by the RHNA methodology. Quantified objectives for new construction are based on the following factors and assumptions: i> Housing construction trends between 1996-2000 (average of 326 units/year) i City records of units completed between 1998 and 2000; Entitled projects in the pipeline currently either under construction or awaiting Planning Commission review and approval, or projects which have been the subject of negotiation with the City but for which permits are pending; The above assumptions and factors illustrate that, while construction trends indicate low production rates, the City has an ample number of entitled projects (see Table 38). Housing production rates, therefore, may increase above past levels, although market trends do not indicate that production rates will consume all entitled projects. Accordingly, the City of Lake Elsinore's quantified objectives for new construction have been set equal to the RHNA allocations. In the event that some or all of the assumed potential units based on past trends, and/or targeted objectives established on availability of federal, state or local funding resources assistance are not achieved, the City will still make substantial progress toward meeting its fair share RHNA allocations. The objectives for a proportion of the low, as well as the moderate and above moderate income groups are anticipated to be met through market rate new construction. The objectives for the very low income group are met under the assumption that significant involvement of the Redevelopment Agency is anticipated in these objectives. It should be noted that the exact number and affordability distribution for units may vary from those specified in the tables. The Planning Center Jadv 2002 Page 99 FINAL VII. Quantified Objectives TABLE 50 NEW CONSTRUCTION HOUSING OBJECTIVES 1998-2005 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Unit TypelDescription # Units Very Low I Low I Moderate ! Upper Single Family Detached 13.982 1 0 0 2,532 1 11.450 Single Family Attached 720 1 0 720 ! 0 1 0 Multi Family 2,548 1,150 1,398 0 0 Mobilehome 23 0 23 0 0 Construction Potential within Planning Period 1 17,273 1,150 2,141 2.532 1 11,450 New Construction Objectives 1998-20115 3,763 978 639 829 1,317 Fair Share Needs Allocation 3,763 976 1 639 829 1,317 Note: Construction potential represents both units constructed between 1998-2000 and those units approved for construction that are expected to be constructed within the olannina period. See Table 39 and associated text for a detailed breakdown of approved units. B. CONSERVATION OF EXISTING "AT RISK" UNITS There are 82 assisted multi -family units in the City of Lake Elsinore. None of the units are at -risk of converting to market rates within 10 years. C. PRESERVATION AND REHABILITATION Table 51 summarizes the preservation and rehabilitation quantified objectives for the planning period. TABLE 51 PRESERVATION/REHABILITATION OBJECTIVES 1998 — 2005 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Program Very Low Income I Low Income Moderate ! Total Rehabilitation Senior Repair P ram 0 5 5 10 HUD Foreclosure Homes 0 5 0 5 Mulli-famay Acquisition 20 0 0 20 Preservation of At -Risk Units' 0 0 0 0 Subtotal I 20 10 5 35 Pre servationlAssistance-:. N3•^ Yr::. Redevelopment Agency and Private 13 39 Devefo ers2 0 52 Mo5gage Credit Certificates 0 10 0 10 Section 8 Rental Assistance Increase3 25 25 0 50 Homeless Outreach Program (ESG)' 18 0 0 18 Subtotal 56 74 0 130 Total 76 1 84 5 155 1 There are no units at -risk during the 1998-2005 Housing Element Period. z These figures are based upon a Development Agreement between the City of Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and Century Builders for assistance of $100,000. Such agreements are expected to continue and ultimately assist 52 total units at a rate of $7,500 per unit. 3 Figure represents the number of additional units to be assisted through Section 8 vouchers. Currently, 108 households are assisted. " Figure represents number of beds. Page 100 Housing Element Update for the City of Lake Elsinore FINAL July 2002 J The Planning Center July 2002 City of Lake Elsinore HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE APPENDIX A PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MAILING LIST FINAL j Appendix A. Public Participation Mailing List This page rntentionally left blank. FINAL Housing Element Update for the Cin, of Lake Elsinore July 2002 j The I Jult> _'1 City of Lake Elsinore HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE APPENDIX A PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MAILING LIST -:achella Valley Housing Coalition -701 Monroe Street, Suite G, Plaza 1 CA 92201 =EXCEL Communities, Inc. .0 Box 907 Juan Capistrano, CA 92693 -,zjitat for Humanity ",, 1 Atlanta Avenue /erside, CA 92507 Housing Authority of the County of Riverside �5 Arlington Avenue „,srside, CA 92504 --�-j", San Diego Office Sv-iphony Towers -:iG B Street, Ste. 1600 San Diego, CA 92101-8131 ` ;;ke Elsinore Board of Realtors W Graham Ave ^ e Elsinore, CA 92530 Elsinore Chamber of Commerce W. Graham Avenue �,e Elsinore, CA 92530 Olson Company Old Ranch parkway, Suite 400 al Beach, CA 90740 -)uthwest Riverside County Economic Alliance X47 Enterprise Circle West, Suite 101 --,ecula, CA 92590 lig Centei- Page A-1 FINAL j Appendix A. Public Participation Mailing List This page intentionally left blank. Page A- 2 FINAL Housing Element Update for the City of Lake Elsinore July 2002 City of Lake Elsinore HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE APPENDIX B GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS The Planning Center Juh- 2002 FINAL Appendix B. General Plan Consistency Analysis This page intentionally left blank. FINAL Housing Element Update for the City of Lake Elsinore July 2002 z w 0 CL ZE 0 IQ t2 xdi w CL � W _ z t VJ c w Q E `� W d W' W � 0).2 r O U) a. X o I — 2 y z W = a ._ c a y Q Qw y U Y C f0 w J y O y >, C O U U c ea a R d C d C9 rya;es ollgnd asloN olwslas A6Jau3 uolleaJoaa I+ pue s)lJed `aped$ uadp i uolaenJasu03 salj!I!oed ollgnd isjopljjo3 oluaas suonnu3 podjiV ;uawa6eueW 4tmojEJ u6lsap uegjn uo13e3nP3 ;uawdolanap olwouoo3 uoiln/nagj asn pue-1 W U J Q. J /O V Z W W J LU0 O X 0 C T e� V CO }I}I}I}I}I} I}I} t of ba rn c U) Q\ bo o mb ca G bm m> 3 m v m ; eNo Ha N im > o� O u- :- rnEm °��,'m_ C O., SV m O y co O r ❑ N'� V E`c C L g 10 C O m. m ,� ra m y O and N c mc°, "in v m c= y4? ayi `o wm _co ° 7Ee7 m b 9 C C , N N V 01 '� G O) ❑ a'i m m �. N m E `c S eco y J tD 0 v+ A _ it C m ro C O m 0 toOa• K O C . C in c m C G e' m m m E m N Z C~ O ` N O wWocoUm G O y V m a N •z 0 toaco° b G► y310 C 3CUm m c�ar�c❑ o Ocoy °w ink cmc 2,, dio° y pe ec°c=° mac O t� o t O E10 G ti 0 O u t > p y ig U c0 h O m Q N V C m ti �.. Q C C N 2 to C> 0 urz O ip b C O U Q G � an m E m 'm m o O r m O m t O c b h rzm `° d c hNom }� c pOusu �m ho yoy a oo 3oa -21 moc oma' Nb c m h m C e➢ O O m i m b m c m G O N E OI— .. O` U° �. ?. �0 L] C ?. N 6 V U it m U m h w 10 t U U N j m ap 3 1 b ?. ,y o> O C m g C 0 ❑` O .Q y m 0 N C O p 0 m-0 O C km c�dC) oEaaEo 4�'mau60Zo 0 C T e� V CO M 31 io x �i 2 ti r4 C Q f4a;es oilgnd asloN }I } } I}i}i}� } I}+ } alwslas }I } } I}I}I}I } I}I } ABJau3 }I } } I}I}I}l } }I } uol;eaJoam pue s)lJed } } } } A } } } } `coeds uado uo!IenJasuoo } ollgnd sJopwoo oluaos suOJlnu3}I}i VodmV ! II kk Zuawafieueyll I } } } } } } I } } } WMOJE) I I + u6lsaQuegJn }I } } I}I} }f } I}I } uol)eonP3 } I } >- I } + } }III >- } I } ;uawdolanap olwou0o3 } } } } } } I } } } asn pue-I } + } } I IAS } } 1 } I } } I } m � N C 7 fn N y m � G G -CO O m Cc (� O ❑ a o h t m Lca m b v, o o O m mto to c m vJ U D7 c t 0 C U a L L j o b b .� ❑ G ma t? b ❑ m m 0 E w J a s x 3 g a❑ a m a ❑❑ U�GQ= G ro°-o x 0 a a� amim m o c Et oa oy m'Lq �mm= mt- as o E N a t g ii m� o� fi t 3 °�: ❑� �� �' b c a y \ 0 �.0 �c m'o y 0 G'm` a t m G r`o 0 O v 40 rommmb `y y o m G �a m 0 m m �- ,y y c m _ .1 O G 4 OL b0 O p cmy k m w m ` CYi O 0 m H Q 9 u w o o x 3 a CO O z _� i� U y `mc' c O o � cm Ea m4J 32 m ca h 'D ocm O O O1 O O lY0 t`D 'O O rn;o N- 0 O y zmh C E 0 OCA C v J ab � L 7� l4 z c p G� `O catras comm m om 3.om mm� 2 W O m 3y cm b b � orb= ❑ G C m_ G m��y ,,, a ,� a? G W o mE� r a o�m o N u. m o m❑ b mQ C E E G V oa.nb c� .0 4 �c C V me x �$ m m moma U 7 O G C .G a a y mE U U 0 0 m m - c� Qoc u_E M a) CL o m❑ 03 m� o'a W m b '9 m 'i.NS N 'C W m C N N !� O m N a m y o m _O m y y c h y y o y V U rrx O Q U m U U m U a U{ U U v! F W a O r L OB m>;, m y �; 0 0= t t O F- �❑ fi c rnF ya�a��r,m` : : ca o w c ❑ ❑'c m _ m j tn U y U_ y m t7 1 y U C .v m> cab O O Z o 0 O d 4. 0 0 C) � ha5a .v O G °� 0❑ OL 4 t a 0 _;t p m � p m m a- E1,; � r4 C Q AGa;es 31lqnd asloN } I } I } I } I } olwslas } I } } I } } A6iau3 } I } I } } 1 } uopealaaa FPUB - SX -Jed } } } } } Z 'coeds uadp Lu z 0 uol)enJasuoO ollgnd Z Lu sjopljjo3 } I } } } } x oluaos w suonnu3 Z. pod iiV 4 N q tluawa6euew c C J LitmoiD f `` .2 m eo n� u6lsad uegjn } I } } } II } Z ! W ( I uol)eonP3 C0.2 O luawdolanap m 3 LL a 3lwouo33 O 1 x Lo I` Z LV C•[D a C - Q W Q I asn pue-1 1 } I } } I} Y = J y C m 3 N O C ,^ vJ d .. m N m o ° Or N m O O W�r h O C N U C U O C N O m > Tm° u = C D C 30 O t m N C \ N 0 eC C7 J m N N O. O y -c) °_�Im°�a_m rr o N m y m 0 m m m„cNQba CD Em O O {e � N `oo �m� o.- `oa 4 ~ cz �M Z EE"°�=o a3 ° xa W aoio0V o u cam: mo ros° �omlm���rt W �3 uoa c Womd>'3a�° c N o C N E V o > E. :g m G .O b O o v N CJ V m C L ° m y m •C y_• E O O p L N O C '° m Nm{mE..vU.•- u mo°° 0.2- yroa�C `'moi; t3'`Edy3��N LO EH�m 0 olaZ o> c� � = C7 L 0 dp0 m � c O = ❑ F- �L C w f4a;eS o!Ignd I } I } I } aslON }I}I} o!wslaS } -n. uolles.130H pue s)Iced } } } 'ooedS uadp Quo!lenJasu-o } } } z C) sa!l!I!aed } } } Ro!Ignd ti i5 sjopujoo } } I } x oluaoS I i a w suonnu3 } } } �odJ!d yrL -i luawaBouew n- 4wojo C O eo +J u6lsap uegjn I� E Uj } } W uolleonP3 } } } u •y O luawdOlanad in 3 a 3lwouo33 } } } X o I 2 N Q Z ` VJ tfO1JDJAJJIJ } ! } } W C j a- c aQ y Q W asn pue-1 } + } } I [a Y C !D ! _ J y ❑ x O N m m mC p =V LL1 N > Avg o U V ca a J ° y m C= r V O 0 fC ^ m fl m N a m ❑ r• r\ 10° 0 J 10 U w m O ~ m V r^ V N m H cm410 � 3 r r m v h `0 Z m!z a�,w3G W O�❑wm cNea c.t W N m o .. C ❑ r�m❑U� W m E m4 m m O x O I_ N C O N O ? Z a p co 1 �J F vi i O m N U m y 1 'J = c�ca0) -n. Noise Element j Noise Element environment is presented in order that the city may include noise impact considerations in development programs. +1111,1 ! a � +1 -! ■ie +�. + a Residential land uses and areas identified as noise sensitive must be protected from excessive noise from non -transportation sources including industrial activities and equipment. These impacts are most effectively controlled through the adoption and application of a city Noise Ordinance. B. INVENTORY OF CURRENT AND FORECAST CONDI- TIONS The following is a detailed description of the current and projected noise environment within the City of Lake Elsinore. This description of the noise environment is based on an identification of noise sources and noise sensitive land uses, a community noise measurement survey and noise contour maps. 1. SOURCES OF NOISE The most common sources of noise in urban areas are transportation related noise sources. These include automobiles, trucks, motorcycles, railroads, and aircraft. Motor vehicle noise is of concern because it is characterized by a high number of individual events which often create a sustained noise level and its proximity to areas sensitive to noise exposure. Aircraft operations, though less frequent, may generate high noise levels that can be disruptive to human activity. The sources of noise in Lake Elsinore fall into five basic categories. These are: freeways and principal arterials (the I-15 and Highway 74); aircraft (from Skylark Airport); major and minor arterial roadways; recreational (power boats and ultralights); and stationary sources. Each of these sources and their impacts on the noise environment of Lake Elsinore are summarized in the following paragraphs. X-2 Noise Element and rest homes. The distribution of these uses varies from moderately quiet residential areas to major transportation corridors. 3. COMMUNITY NOISE MEASUREMENT SURVEY The determination of the major noise sources and the identification of noise sensitive receptors provide the basis of developing a community noise survey. A noise measurement survey was conducted at locations which reflect the noise levels at these facilities. Each site was monitored for 15 minutes. The results of the survey and the methodology used in the measurements are summarized in the Technical Appendices. 4. COMMUNITY NOISE CONTOURS The community noise contours for the City of Lake Elsinore are presented in Exhibits X-1 and X-2 for existing 1988 and post -2010 conditions, respectively. The contours in Exhibit X-1 are based on the existing traffic volumes and other sources of noise in the community. The contours in Exhibit X-2 represent expected traffic conditions after the year 2010. Noise contours represent lines of equal noise exposure, just as the contour lines on a topographic map are lines of equal elevation. The contours shown on the maps are the 60, 65 and 70 dB Ldn noise level. The noise contours presented should be used as a guide for land use planning. The 60 dB Ldn contour defines the Noise Referral Zone. This is the noise level for which noise considerations are included when making land use policy decisions. Topography and intervening buildings or barriers have a very complex effect on the propagation of noise. To present a worst case estimate, the topographic effect is not included in these contours. C- FINDINGS The predominant noise in Lake Elsinore, as in most other communities, comes from mobile noise sources including motor vehicles. Interstate 15, Highway 74, and several arterial roadways expose portions of the city to significant noise levels, particularly in "J X 4 0 X • :J E3 Z J J Q W 6-Z W D � � W D� n Z� J W WY CD W� L Q� LL J Noise Ekmew those areas directly adjacent to these sources. General aviation aircraft operations from Skylark Airport, ultralight operations over the lake, and power boats also contribute to the noise environment. The noise impacts due to planes originating from Skylark and ultralight flights are considered minimal. Noise from power boat and jet ski activity on the lake create short term peak noise impacts on nearby residential uses. Other sources of noise within the city are from non -transportation sources including industrial and commercial plants. The noise environment in Lake Elsinore is typical of a rural setting, except at locations affected by these transportation, recreational, and non -transportation noise sources. Noise affects all types of land uses and activities, although some are more sensitive to high noise levels than others. Land uses identified as noise sensitive include residences of all types; hospitals, rest homes, convalescent hospitals, places of worship and schools. Within the city are sensitive uses such as public and private schools, day care centers and rest homes. The noise environment for Lake Elsinore has been described using noise contours developed for the major noise sources within the city. The 60 dB Ldn contour represents the Noise Referral Zone for which any proposed noise sensitive land use within this zone should be evaluated on a project specific basis and the project may require mitigation to meet city or state (Title 25) standards. Most cities use 65 Ldn as the cut-off point for a Noise Referral Zone, and the corresponding exterior noise standard for residential and other sensitive land uses. An exterior standard of 60 Ldn has been established in order to preserve the rural, natural and desired environment of Lake Elsinore. For Lake Elsinore, the 65 Ldn contour represents zones where residential development should be discouraged without proper mitigation as part of the project. The sources of noise in Lake Elsinore can be divided into two basic categories, transportation sources and non -transportation sources. A local government has little direct control of transportation noise at the source. State and federal agencies have the responsibility to control the noise from the source, such as vehicle noise emission levels. The most effective method the city has to mitigate transportation noise is through reducing the impact of the noise onto the community, such as noise barriers and site design review. X-5 Table X-1 NOISE AND LAND USE COMPATIBILITY MATRIX LAND USE CATEGORIES DAY N]GHT No= LEVEL ILDN C-�17n()rtrrrc re ej i4 RET�•'TIAL � Siayc iaCity. Agki Maniple Faa,7y A A B 8 C D D u moba`How A A B C C D D Hotel. Moaar, Teadealsdiiai AapoaaL Dissries A A B B C C D Q71y+x+EpCI AL R c,f105i. V!Uzrz t?s:, 5� u, comma" R"ALSaat Raeai—m Movie Tiarrs A } A A B B C gAWT1tGAL A7:1S7RW. T Orr= "ldi iL+asasaS ad �L S 7=0N rx.crIL PM168eioaal A A Oman Ory ORIS um'.4 A B B C D 1leasatioa DtS'--.'n0NAL Aa&lcriwL Mactlyd Iiaa B B i C CD D D Ciao CCU" I CJT.l ARCA` Qildtsaa Amaaemeat?Wt.mua auan Reersa�,ca cowl Cswu, Gann Trac, ER-Irm Carver, Spatz Cub A A A B B D D ©M�LTRCAr GtWT&L Sps:ss: A—MoDikSerrics SLLuVIL Arno II Deal1Waaip, Maaulaecrai. WareAm*— A A wsokaak, u4JiLes A A D 8 8 s :Iot:,ti Gex, Hap,ul. awm. L rery Sd0*41' ClLur=u A A B C C D D rraJ SPAa + rA A AC D D 01LN SPACF Gal Carse. crMrnta, wase ewers Wild We Kuwna. vr"s Habitat A A A A B C C Ac�;c `: `rr`aAVWWunA A A A A A A 1 r p ^T N ZONE A spwirxd 1=6 aw fs:■: [W=I y. bsaad UP= *a am, CLEARLY COWAM BLE buiidtap mvded = of lv==. =ov=tiraaal=u=u==Wwut aay my gccw aoisc b m datsoa MqutstmsaLL ZONEB Ncw R7<ZTC c1= or d"clOPmr�l ahouW b: trud�= paj zfu7dcsas}sd NORMAi�Y COt�ATTBLE =Iysu of the mix tsdocsi= req<sirtta�ta an matic and owdW taoise iasulatioa furca a the d== ars: dc=mi tjL Cm�a caaarract = with ckzcd windows sad fresh as uppiy sy� er air ZONE c Nc- o==ucti= Of dcn10pm= should tt�y be dir; am it NOR.%iA.LLY INCOMPATIBLE =rs�a = a d"elopm=l does pmcaed, a acuBed aaal >arw, rcd=oa rcgLrs:== matt he made and ]' off seise zsaodad Waist imsilalscan yrs u -luded iu the design. ZONE D Nm r+oartractica ar d CUARLY INCOMPATIBLE ryckp rhWW wally mL br p W=ukaa. X -6a Noise Element 1. Tlansportto ion No^ iae Control: The most efficient and effective means of controlling noise from transportation systems is reducing noise at the source. However, since the city has little direct control over source noise levels because of state and federal preemption (ie., state Motor Vehicle Noise Standards and federal Air Regulations), policies should be focused on reducing the impact of the noise on the community. Cooperative efforts with state and federal offices are essential. 2. Coordinate with Caltrans for the possible future installation of freeway noise barriers along the Corona Freeway (I-15) to attenuate freeway noise effectively for existing noise sensitive land uses. Ensure the employment of noise mitigation measures in the design or improvement of arterial roadways consistent with funding capability and support efforts by the California Department of Transportation to provide for acoustical protection of existing noise sensitive land uses affected by these projects. 3. Provide for continued evaluation of truck movements and routes in the city to provide effective separation from residential or other noise sensitive land uses. 4. Encourage the enforcement of state Motor Vehicle noise standards for cars, trucks, and motorcycles through coordination with the California Highway Patrol and Police Department. 5. Any future plans to expand Skylark Airport should include an airport Master Plan to insure compatibility with surrounding land uses and future development plans in the area. 6. Noise and Land Use Planning Integration; Community noise considerations are to be incorporated into land use planning. These measures are intended to prevent future noise and land -use incompatibilities. 7. Establish standards that specify acceptable limits of noise for various land uses throughout the city. These criteria are designed to integrate noise considerations into land use planning to prevent new noise/land use conflicts. Table X-1 shows criteria used to assess the compatibility of proposed land X-7 Noise Element from non -transportation related noise sources such as music, machinery and pumps and air conditioners. The ordinance does not apply to motor vehicle noise on public streets, but it does apply to vehicles on private property. The ordinance is designed to protect quiet residential areas from stationary noise sources. The noise levels encouraged by the ordinance are typical of a quiet residential area. 11. Enforce the Noise Ordinance. The most effective method to control community noise impacts from non -transportation noise sources is through application of the community noise ordinance. 12. Require that new industrial or commercial projects, to be built near existing residential land use, demonstrate compliance with the city ordinance regulations for noise prior to approval of the project. 13. Limit the hours of construction activity in residential areas in order to reduce the intrusion of noise in the early morning and late evening hours and on weekends and holidays. Hours of construction should be limited to 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. on weekdays and 8 a.m. to S p.m. on weekends and holidays. Ensure adequate noise control measures at all construction sites through the provision of mufflers and the physical separation of machinery maintenance areas from adjacent residential uses. 14. Designate one agency in the city to act as the noise control coordinator. This will ensure the continued operation of noise enforcement efforts of the city. ►�] ERRATA SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL GENERAL PLAN EIR LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN ARIENDMENT June 1995 The following are text changes to the Final EIR prepared for the Lake Ehsw ee Creno Plana and its recent amendment. These changes respond to comments made by the Lake Elsinore City Council during their public hearing on March 14, 1995. These text changes stipetsede applicable text contained in the Final EIR prepared for the General Plan in 1990. These revisions are part of the public record and Final EIR. 1. Under PUBLIC SCHOOLS Mitigasion Mrd=s Page 162: As it reads: "1. Prior to approval of development proposals. the City and school district shall ensure that adequate provisions for school facilities are provided. The City shall consider requiring dedication of land and/or improvements by project applicants and alternative funding mechanisms, such as implementing Community Facilities Districts to provide school facilities." Changed to: "1. Applicants and the school district shall ensure that adequate provisions for school facilities are provided, at the time required by the school district." 2. Under PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Mitigation Measures, Page 162: As it reads: "2. Developments shall be subject to school impact fees as assessed by the school district." Changed to: "2. Developments shall be subject to school impact fees as required by the school district and State law -N J MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL GENERAL PLAN EIR LASE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT Prepared By: CITY OF LASE ELSINORE 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92330 (909) 674-3124 FEBRUARY 1995 .j MIT`IGAT'ION MONITORING PROGRAM LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Effective January 1, 1989, the California Environmental Quality Act was amended to add Section 21081.6, implementing Assembly Bill (AB) 3180. As part of CEQA environmental review procedures, AB 3180 requires a public agency to adopt a monitoring and reporting program for assessing and ensuring efficiency of any required mitigation measures applied to proposed developments. As stated in Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code: "...the public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes to the project which it has adopted, or made a condition or project approval, in order to mitigate or avoid significant affects on the environment." Section 21081.6 provides general guidelines for implementing monitoring and reporting programs. Specific reporting and/or monitoring requirements, to be enforced during project implementation, shall be defined prior to final approval of the project proposal by the responsible decision maker(s). In response to established CEQA requirements and those of Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., the proposed mitigation monitoring program shall be submitted for consideration prior to completion of the environmental review process to enable the decision maker's appropriate response to proposals. The mitigation monitoring program must be provided as part of the Final EIR. The mitigation monitoring program is presented in this section. Each recommended mitigation measure is listed and categorized by impact topic, with an accompanying discussion of: The party responsible for implementation of mitigation measure. The phase of the project during which the measure should be monitored. The method of verifying compliance with mitigation measure. The agency responsible for monitoring compliance with mitigation measure. The previous Final EIR for the 1990 General Plan did not contain a mitigation monitoring program. The program contained in this section, therefore, addresses those mitigation measures presented in the 1990 Final EIR and those mitigation measures presented in the Supplemental EIR for the proposed General Plan Amendment. Those additional mitigation measures contained in the Supplemental EIR will be indicated by "'. It should be noted that several mitigation measures that were previously contained in the Final EIR for the 1990 General Plan have been revised in this document due to the following reasons: 1. The particular measure no longer is relevant. `a 2. Specific language in the measure requires cleaning up. 3. There is redundancy between certain measures. The mitigation measures have been revised so as to be more relevant to the City and to current conditions and to eliminate redundancy. 3 LAND USE 1. Each project application shall be reviewed through the design review process to ensure that potential land use conflicts are avoided and adequate buffer areas are established between differing land uses. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to design review approvals Plan check and review of design plans City Planning Department 2. The City shall consider locating essential commercial uses near residential uses to reduce cross-town traffic, noise and/or air quality emissions. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Prior to appropriate future development approvals Plan check and review of development proposals to ensure this measure is implemented City Planning Department 3. The City shall review each appropriate application for conformance with the City's design guidelines, the design guidelines for the Central Business District, the landscape guidelines, and all other Zoning Code requirements. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: GEOLOGY50ILS City Prior to appropriate future development approvals Plan check and review of design plans City Planning Department 4. Geotechnical investigations by a certified engineering geologist or registered civil engineer shall be submitted for all grading and construction proposed within any area of potential slope instability and/or area near known seismic hazards. 4 - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of grading permits Plan check and review of geotechnical investigations City Engineering Department 5. The City shall provide qualified expertise for review of geotechnical reports and sufficient personnel for field inspection of grading operations and construction. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Throughout implementation of General Plan Inclusion in City budget to provide qualified expertise City Engineering Department 6. Potential slope failures shall be mitigated by site planning, sound grading practices, local ground treatment and special foundations. Slope stability shall also result from inspection of grading which allows for detection of variations from expected conditions. The feasibility of these and other alternative methods must be evaluated on a site specific/project basis. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of grading permits Plan check and review of grading plans; site inspection of grading City Engineering Department 7. The City shall develop a hillside development ordinance to preserve and maintain natural character of major ridgelines while providing protection from geologic hazards. the hillside development ordinance shall address development densities, treatment of graded slopes, siting of structures, landscape treatments and design features. Development projects on hillside terrain must comply with the hillside development ordinance. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: -� 5 city throughout implementation of General Plan 8. 9. - Method of Monitoring: City prepare hillside development ordinance - Monitoring Agency: City Planning and Engineering Departments Grading of sites shall include erosion, siltation and dust, control plans which are to be approved by the City Engineer. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of grading permits Plan check and review of grading plans and erosion control plans City Engineering Department The City shall require development proposals to comply with goals and objectives established in the City's Public Safety and Urban Services Element. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to appropriate future development approvals Plan check and review of future development proposals to ensure implementation of this measure City Planning Department 10. Analysis of onsite densities, shear strengths, and consolidation characteristics shall be reviewed and approved by the City to ensure reduction of risk associated with potential geologic and seismic hazards. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of grading permits Plan check and review of grading plans City Engineering Department 11. To reduce potential risk to structures, incorporation of proper safety factors in slope stability calculations, combined with attention to the aspects of design shall be reviewed and accepted by the City. 6 - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of grading permits Plan check and review of grading plans City Planning and Engineering Departments 12. The City shall require that structural construction comply with the Uniform Building Code, specifically Chapter 23 as it provides for earthquake -resistant design and Chapter 70 as it provides for excavation and grading, and with the City's adopted hillside development ordinance. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring:- - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of building permits Plan check and review of building plans City Engineering and Building Departments 13. Proposed mining operations shall be subject to additional environmental clearance to provide mitigation measures for potential noise, traffic, habitat loss, water quality and visual impacts. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to approval of future mining operations Preparation and review of environmental clearance document(s) City Planning Department 14. Prior to approval of developments that may eliminate extraction of regionally significant mineral resources, the City shall evaluate the value and quantity of mineral resources. The City shall also adopt mitigation measures for development projects in or near mining operations to assure adequate buffering areas, runoff and hillside preservation. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: 7 Future applicants Prior to approval of future mining operations Preparation and review of environmental clearance document(s) - Monitoring Agency: HYDROLOGY City Planning Department 15. All structures proposed within 100 -year flood zones shall be elevated at least one foot above the 100 -year flood level. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of building permits Plan check and review of building plans City Building Department 16. The City shall require submittal of information prepared by a qualified civil or hydrological engineer for projects within the 100 -year flood zone to certify compliance with development standards established for 100 -year flood zones. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of building permits Plan check and review of building plans City Building 1],epa=ent 17. The City shall require incorporation of adequate erosion control measures into future development projects. Such measures shall include sandbagging of newly graded slopes, prompt planting of disturbed areas, phasing of grading and construction activities to minimize exposed areas susceptible to erosion, and routing of runoff flows through desilting basins prior to discharge into any watercourse. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of grading permits Plan check and review of erosion control Plans City Planning Department 18. The City shall implement a periodic street sweeping program to minimize debris entering the City's drainage system. - Responsible for Implementation: City 8 - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Throughout implementation of General Plan City prepare and implement street sweeping Prof City Engineering Department 19. Following updates to the Flood Insurance Rate Maps, the City shall review and amend the Zoning Code and the zoning map to reflect changes to the floodway and floodway fringe and to regulate and restrict development in those areas as necessary to protect life and property from flood hazards. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Throughout implementation of General Plan; following updates to flood rate maps City amend Zoning Code and zoning map City Planning Department 20. The City shall amend the Zoning Code and zoning map to comply with the Lake Management Project to establish setbacks from waterways. - Responsible for Implementation: City - Monitoring Phase: Throughout implementation of General Plan - Method of Monitoring: City amend Zoning Code and zoning map - Monitoring Agency: City Planning Department 21. The City shall coordinate with the six agencies of the Lake Elsinore Management Authority to implement the Lake Management Project. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Throughout implementation of General Plan City coordinate with Lake Elsinore Management Authority City Engineering Department 22.* The City shall review all future development on a project -by -project basis and shall ensure that all associated drainage plans meet FEMA standards and regulations. 9 - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: ag Throughout implementation of General Plan Plan check and review of drainage plans City Engineering and Building Departments 23.* The City, when reviewing future development proposals within SFHAs, are required to ensure that FEMA flood protection criteria are met. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Throughout implementation of General Plan Plan check and review of drainage plans City Engineering and Building Departments 24.* The City, as required by the National Flood Insurance Program, shall notify FEMA when future development results in changes to the SFHAs and obtain appropriate betters of Map Revisions (LOMRs) or physical map revisions from FEMA. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Throughout implementation of General Plan City shall notify FEMA as necessary City Engineering Department 25.* If future development results in excavation of five acres or more of area, then a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, in compliance with NPDES requirements shall be acquired. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: 10 Future applicants Prior to issuance of building permits Applicants provide proof that NPDES permits were acquired City Engineering and Building Departments BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 26. The City shall require that future development proposals to include adequate environmental documentation, pursuant to CEQA and AB 3180 (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code), of all high and potentially high sensitive biological resource areas as necessary. The City shall require that all development proposals provide feasible mitigation measures for preserving or mitigating impacts on significant biological resources. If deemed necessary, the City shall utilize the recommended scope of analyses contained in the California Department of Fish and Game letter of January 20, 1994 as a basis, and establish the scope for biological analyses for future developments. 27. 28. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to appropriate future development approvals Plan check and review of biological assessments and mitigation measures City Planning Department As necessary, permanent open space preserves shall be designated in areas of high and/or potentially high biological sensitivity for purposes of protecting biological resources. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to appropriate future development approvals Plan check and review of development proposals to ensure this measure is implemented City Planning Department To the extent feasible, native vegetation and drought -resistant native plants shall be used for landscaping purposes. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: 11 Future applicants Prior to landscaping plan approvals Plan check and review of landscaping plans City Planning Department 29_ Any proposed alteration of riparian areas found along designated United States Geological Survey blue -line streams and major drainage .courses will be subject to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permitting process under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. Alteration of USGS-designated blue -line stream channels is also subject to permitting by the California Department of Fish and Game under Section 1601-1603 of the Cali_fomia Fish and Game Code and the CEQA Guidelines. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of building permits Plan check and review of building plans, including proof that appropriate permits have been acquired City Building and Planning Departments 30. Biological surveys shall be conducted for all proposed projects in the known range of the Stephen's kangaroo rat. Specific mitigation measures shall be required based on recommendations of these biological studies. All biological studies shall be forwarded to the California Department of Fish and Game and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service for review. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of grading permits Plan check and review of grading plans, biological assessments and mitigation measures City Planning and Engineering Departments 31. Detailed biological studies shall be prepared for any project within the Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) area. Projects impacting habitat of the least Bell's vireo pursuant to the adopted HCP shall compensate by creating riparian habitat in another location of equal area and quality. No development shall be allowed within 100 feet of the established habitat area. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: 12 Future applicants Prior to issuance of grading permits Plan check and review of grading plans, biological assessments, and mitigation measures - Monitoring Agency: City Planning and Engineering Departments 32. Biological studies shall be required for all Riversidian alluvial sage scrub habitat areas where potential for slender horned spineflower habitat exists. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of grading permits Plan check and review of grading plans, biological assessments, and mitigation measures City Planning and Engineering Departments 33. On a citywide basis, the City shall identify and preserve open space areas which contain significant biological resources, particularly those biological areas of high and potentially high sensitivity. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Throughout implementation of General Plan City identify open space areas on GIS system City Planning Department 34. The City, in conjunction with County, State and Federal agencies, shall consider acquisition of significant habitat areas along the San Jacinto River and Temescal Wash for permanent open space. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: TRANSPORTATION CIRCULATION City Throughout implementation of General Plan City continue consideration of acquisition City Planning Department 35: The City shall identify a new interchange location at Olive Street and the I-15 freeway and designate Olive Street as an arterial facility between Mission Trail and the freeway. - Responsible for Implementation: City 13 - Monitoring Phase: Throughout implementation of General Plan - Method of Monitoring: City continue to consider these designations - Monitoring Agency: City Engineering Department 36. The City shall designate freeway overcrossings (without ramps) at Riverside Drive, Chaney Street, and Malaga Road to relieve traffic congestion on Route 74 (Central Avenue) and Railroad Canyon Road. Remainder of streets shall be designated as local streets. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Throughout implementation of General Plan City continue to consider these designations City Engineering Department 37. Roadway improvements shall be phased to accommodate projected traffic volumes. New developments shall submit additional traffic analyses with project applications, as necessary. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to appropriate future development approvals Plan check and review of traffic analyses City Engineering Department 38. The following shall be considered to implement the Circulation Element: developer fees and exactions, assessment districts, systems development charge, State and Federal funding, and construction of circulation improvements as a condition of approval for new development. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: 14 City Throughout implementation of General Plan City continue to consider and utilize various financial options to implement Circulation Element City Engineering Department 39. The City shall provide a circulation network that accommodates safe and efficient movement of cyclists on bike lanes. Thffic controls shall be provided for bicycle crossings at major intersections. The City shall implement the goals, objectives and policies of the Circulation Element of the General Plan. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Throughout implementation of General Plan City continue to implement safety goals of Circulation Element City Engineering Department 40. The City shall encourage sidewalks in residential and commercial areas to separate pedestrian from vehicular traffic. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to operations of future developments Site inspections to ensure that adequate sidewalks are provided City Planning Department 41. The City shall coordinate with the Lake Elsinore Transportation System (LETS) and Riverside Transportation Agency (RTA) to add additional transit routes and shall require construction of bus turnouts adjacent to new developments. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Throughout implementation of General Plan City continue to coordinate with LETS and RTA City Engineering Department 42. To separate vehicular and non -vehicular traffic, the City shall encourage location of hiking and equestrian trails within permanent open space areas, agricultural edges, utility easements, flood control channels and rural density areas, etc., as designated in the Open Space/Conservation Element. - Responsible for Implementation: Future applicants 15 - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Prior to appropriate future development approvals Plan check and review of development Proposals City Planning Department 43. The City shall require all employers with 50 or more employees to implement a City - approved Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program conforming with Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG) guidelines. The TDM program will serve to promote employee participation in trip reduction and ridesharing programs and will reduce emissions from vehicles, as well as increase average vehicle ridership (AVR), and decrease total vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for commuting between home and the work site. Increased AVR and decreased VMR shall be achieved by various strategies, including: a. Direct financial incentives for ridesharing b. Establishment of carpool, buspool, or vanpool programs C. Full or partial subsidization of parking for ridesharing employees d. Full or partial subsidization of carpools, vanpools, buspools, shuttles or use of public transit e. Provision of an allowance for employees to utilize company-owned fleet vehicles for ridesharing purposes f. Preferential parking for vehicles used for ridesharing g. Facility improvements which provide preferential access and/or egress for ridesharing employees h. Facility improvements to encourage use of bicycles (showers, bike racks, etc.) L Active use of a computerized rideshare matching service, or an effective in-house rideshare matching service j. Compressed work weeks such as a 4/10 or 9/80 work schedule where employees work 40 hours in fewer than five days in one week or 80 hours in fewer than ten days in two weeks k. Work hours that facilitate employee ridesharing 16 - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future employers with 50 or more employees Prior to operation of businesses Review and acceptance of trip reduction Pmt City Engineering Department 44.* Throughout implementation of the General Plan, those recommendations contained in the traffic study (Appendix B) shall be complied with and implemented. The following summadzes these recommendations. a. Recommended functional classifications of amended Circulation Element roadways, including freeway, urban arterial, major, secondary, collector, and local roadways. b. Special programs, including development impact monitoring programs, roadway implementation phasing programs, transportation facilities funding programs, local congestion management programs, and regional coordination programs. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Throughout implementation of General Plan City continue to implement recommendations from traffic study (Appendix B) City Planning and Engineering Departments 45.* The City shall review all future development on a project -by -project basis and establish conditions, as necessary, to ensure that: a. A Traffic Impact Analysis MA) is prepared for future development that exceeds the CMP threshold of 200 peak hour trips. b. Sufficient parking is provided in accordance with the City's Zoning Ordinance. C. Traffic safety is enhanced to the greatest extent possible. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: 17 Future applicants Prior to appropriate future development approvals - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: 46. 47. -Plan check and review of TIAs which shall address future projects' provision of parking and enhancement of traffic safety City Planning and Engineering Departments Impact of short-term construction -generated emissions shall be reduced to the extent feasible by the following measures: a. Scheduling construction and grading to avoid Santa Ana wind conditions, by periodically sprinkling with water, and by paving the area proposed for parking as soon as possible. b. No grading shall take place onsite when wind velocity onsite exceeds 15 miles per hour. C. Restrict construction during second stage smog alerts. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of grading permits Plan check and review of grading plans, schedules, and procedures to ensure that foregoing measures are included City Engineering Department Future applicants shall submit fugitive dust control plans to the City to reduce amount of dust generated during grading and compaction. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of grading permits Plan check and review of dust control plans City Engineering Department 48. Future development projects shall comply with all adopted SCAQIvID rules and regulations. Individual projects shall conform with provisions of SCAQMD Rule XV and participate in trip reduction and ridesharing programs, which may include preferential carpool parking, modified work schedules such as flex -time, and utilization of public transportation. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of certificates of occupancies Review of programs to ensure that future projects conform with provisions of SCAQMD Rule XV City Planning Department 49. Future projects shall provide for convenient pedestrian access to transit stops by construction of sidewalks, etc. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Metbod of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of certificates of occupancies Site inspections to verify that adequate accesses are provided City Planning and Engineering Departments 50.* The City shall continue to participate in WRCOG's programs to implement their Model Air Quality Element and continue to implement appropriate SCAG policies relating to air quality management and planning. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: NOISE City Throughout implementation of General Plan City shall continue to participate in WRCOG's programs City Planning Department 51. Appropriate development shall require preparation of hauling plans. The hauling plans shall include the following. Construction activities shall be limited to weekdays from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM. Truck noise from hauling operations shall be minimized by establishing hauling routes which avoid residential areas. - Responsible for Implementation: Future applicants 19 - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Prior to issuance of grading permits Review of hauling plans to ensure these measures are addressed City Planning Department 52.* For new construction located near existing development, especially if extensive heavy equipment operations are anticipated, existing residents within 300 feet of anticipated development shall be provided with phone numbers for the construction contractor who would respond to any complaints and who would make measuremcnts to verify that noise performance standards are met. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of grading permits Future applicants provide City with phone numbers City Planning Department 53.* The City shall discourage location of sensitive developments within areas exceeding 65 dBA contours unless adequate mitigation is provided. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Metbod of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to appropriate future development approvals Plan check and review of site plans to ensure this measure is implemented City Planning Department 54.* The City shall review all future development on a project -by -project basis and determine if additional noise evaluations are necessary. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: Future applicants Prior to appropriate future development approvals Plan check and review of additional acoustical analyses - Monitoring Agency: City Planning Department 55.* The City shall coordinate with Caltrans to construct a noise barrier along I-15 to achieve 1 acceptable noise levels for existing dwellings exposed to excessive noise levels resulting from additional freeway improvements. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: WA Throughout implementation of General Plan City continue to coordinate with Caltrans City Planning and Engineering Departments 56.* If Skypark Airport is proposed for expansion, the City shall establish proper mitigation and conditions of approval to ensure that noise increases resulting from expansion would be reduced adequately. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: AESTHETICS City Prior to approval of any expansion of Skypark Airport City to establish sufficient mitigation as part of any expansion City Planning Department 57. The City shall restrict development along Temescal Wash to uses which retain and preserve the open space and natural character of these resource areas. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to appropriate future development approvals Plan check and review of land use and landscaping plans to ensure this measure is implemented City Planning Department 58. The City shall implement objectives and policies from the Community Design Element which promote preservation and enhancement of the character of downtown, and policies -".,1 21 in the Open SpaceJConservation and Parks and Recreation Elements, which provide for retention of open space features and preservation of highly sensitive biological resources. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Throughout implementation of General Plan Plan check and review of land use and landscaping plans to ensure this measure is implemented City Planning Department 59. The City shall enact a hillside development ordinance to provide mitigation measures for potential aesthetic impacts associated with landform alteration. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Throughout implementation of General Plan City prepare hillside development ordinance City Planning and Engineering Departments 60. When potential impacts upon sensitive locations are identified, the City shall require project applicants to submit a visual impact analysis. These analyses shall clearly demonstrate project effects on any sensitive and/or unique aesthetic landform. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to appropriate future development approvals Review of visual impact analyses City Planning Department 61. The City shall require that new structures and improvements be integrated with the surrounding environment and incorporate potential vistas or viewpoints within the design of development. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: 22 Future applicants Prior to appropriate future development approvals I - Method of Monitoring: Plan check and review of land use and landscaping plans to ensure this measure is implemented - Monitoring Agency: City Planning Department PUBLIC UTILITIES. FACILITIES, AND SERVICES Water Supply 62. The City shall require new development to conserve water by incorporating the following measures: 63 64. a. low -flush toilets b. low -flow showers and faucets C. insulation of hot water pipes d. landscape with low water -consuming vegetation wherever feasible with controlled irrigation - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of building permits Plan check and review of building plans to ensure facilities are provided - - City Building Department Applicants shall ensure that adequate water supplies and distribution systems are available. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of building permits Plan check and review of building plans to ensure that adequate water supply and distribution are available City Building Department The City shall coordinate with water districts to proceed with planned water purchases to ensure adequate water supplies are available. 23 65. 67. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: �m Throughout implementation of General Plan City continue to coordinate with water districts City Engineering Department Applicants shall use reclaimed water for irrigation of golf courses, and parks and to maintain the lake when feasible. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of building permits Plan check and review of building plans to ensure reclaimed water is used to the greatest extent feasible City Building Department Applicants shall ensure that adequate storage volumes and fire flow are available. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of building permits Plan check and review of building plans to ensure adequate storage volumes and fire flows are available City Building Department The City shall encourage construction or expansion of facilities to provide for reuse of wastewater when determined cost effective. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: 24 City Throughout implementation of General Plan Plan check and review of utility plans to ensure this measure is implemented City Building Department Wastewater 68. All required sewer improvements shall be designed and constructed to City and County standards. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District shall determine when existing facilities shall be upsized. r-11 Police - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of building permits Plan check and review of building plans to ensure adequate sewer improvements are provided City Building Department The City shall coordinate with Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District to ensure that improvements presented in their Wastewater Master Plan are constructed. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Throughout implementation of General Plan City continue to coordinate with water district City Engineering Department 70. Prior to issuance of certificates of occupancies, applicants and the Riverside County Sheriff Department shall coordinate to provide adequate police service, including provision of mitigation fees, if necessary. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of certificates of occupancies Applicants provide proof of agreement City Planning Department 71. The City shall encourage new developments and improvements to employ defensible space concepts into site design and building specifications (eg., appropriate setbacks, adequate lighting of walkways and parking lots, and the use of burglary -resistant hardware 25 and fixtures in buildings). - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to appropriate future development approvals Plan check and review of land use and site Plans City Planning Department 72. The City shall encourage establishment of neighborhood watch programs and shall provide ongoing support to participating neighborhoods. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: city Throughout implementation of General Plan City continue to encourage establishment of programs City Engineering Department 73. The City shall periodically evaluate the level of police service being provided. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Throughout implementation of General Plan City periodically evaluates level of police services City Planning Department 74. The City shall encourage commercial developments exceeding 150,000 square feet and industrial developments exceeding 300,000 square feet to provide private security systems and services to ensure public safety. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: j 26 Future applicants Throughout operations of developments Site inspections to ensure private security is provided as necessary 75. Fire 76. 77. 78. - Monitoring Agency: City Planning Department Applicants shall design future streets to ensure public safety. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to appropriate future development approvals Plan check and review of land use and street plans City Planning and Engineering Departments The City shall coordinate with Riverside County Fire Department to implement recommendations from the County's "Fire Protection Study Report". - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Throughout implementation of General Plan City continue to coordinate with County City Planning and Engineering Departments The fire protection/emergency study referenced above shall be updated to address required fire facilities for projected General Plan buildout. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Throughout implementation of General Plan City continue to coordinate with County City Planning and Engineering Departments All tentative tract maps shall be reviewed by the City and Riverside County Fire Department to ensure fire services/facilities are available to serve development. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: 27 Future applicants Prior to tentative tract map approvals - Method of Monitoring: Plan check and review of tentative tract maps - Monitoring Agency: City Planning and Engineering Departments 79.* Future developers shall participate in the County's fire protection impact mitigation program, as appropriate. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of certificates of occupancies Applicants provide proof of participation City Planning Department 80.* The City shall cooperate with the County Fire Department to the greatest extent feasible, to assist in increasing the Fire Department's annual operating budget. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Solid Waste 81. 82. City Throughout implementation of General Plan City continue to coordinate with County City Planning and Engineering Departments The City shall coordinate with the County of Riverside to ensure that adequate solid waste facilities and collection facilities are provided to Lake Elsinore. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Throughout implementation of General Plan City continue to coordinate with County City Planning and Engineering Departments Applicants shall ensure that landfills can accommodate proposed development. - Responsible for Implementation: Future applicants 28 - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Prior to issuance of certificates of occupancies Applicants provide proof that projects would be adequately serviced City Planning and Engineering Departments 83. Future projects shall comply with all adopted City programs for waste collection, including recycling programs. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Public Schools 84. 85. Future applicants Throughout implementation of General Plan Applicants participate in City -adopted Prolp-d= City Engineering Department Applicants and the school district shall ensure that adequate provisions for school facilities are provided, at the time required by the school district. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants At the time required by the school district Applicants provide proof of agreements with district City Planning Department Developments shall be subject to school impact fees as required by the school district and State law. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: 29 Future applicants At the time required by the school district Applicants provide proof of payment of fees City Planning Department Parks and Recreation 86. 87. Applicants shall provide for a combination of local parks and recreation programs which meet the City's recreational needs. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to appropriate future development approvals Plan check and review of land use and landscaping plans City Planning and Community Services Departments Park acreage shall be provided at a ratio of five acres per 1,000 population. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Library Services Future applicants Prior to appropriate future development approvals Plan check and review of land use and landscaping plans City Planning and Community Services Departments 88. The City shall coordinate with the Riverside City and County Public Library System to provide for sufficient library expansion. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Throughout implementation of General Plan City continue to coordinate with library system City Planning Department 89. The City shall adopt an ordinance to establish developer fees for provision of library services. 30 - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Electricity and Natural Gas City Throughout implementation of General Plan City shall adopt ordinance City Planning Department 90. A master infrastructure plan shall be developed by the utility agencies which allow construction and undergrounding of all systems. Concurrent undergrounding and installation of utility lines would be considered in the plan. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: City Throughout implementation of General Plan City coordinate with utility agencies for development of master infrastructure plan City Planning Department 91. All structures shall comply with building standards in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. Provisions for natural heating and cooling including variable shading, overhangs, clerestory windows, louvers, and energy-efficient building orientation shall be included in project design to the extent feasible. Energy-efficient lighting shall also be used (eg., high-pressure sodium outdoor lighting and fluorescent indoor lighting). - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to issuance of building permits Plan check and review of building plans to ensure implementation of this measure City Building Department 92. All specific plans shall include provisions for the continued unobstructed access to and along the Southern California Electric (SCE) transmission facilities for patrol, repair and maintenance. Proposed grading, improvements, and other encroachments into the transmission right-of-way shall be reviewed and approved by SCE. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: 31 Future applicants Prior to specific plan approvals - Method of Monitoring: Pian check and review of specific plans and utility plans by City and SCE - Monitoring Agency: City Planning Department 93. The City shall require environmental analysis for routing new electrical/gas transmission lines to minimize impacts on adjacent land uses and biological resources. - Responsible for Implementation: Future applicants - Monitoring Phase: Prior to approval of new transmission Imes - Method of Monitoring: Review oflans for new P tan-qmi-ssion lines and associated env=rmenW analyses - Monitoring Agency: City Planning Department Cable Television 94. An ageement between applicants and the cable company shall be negotiated in order to provide cable service. Provisions will be outlined for financing of existing and proposed underground cable television lines. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Telephone Services Future applicants Prior to issuance of certificates of occupancies Applicants provide proof of agreement with cable company City Planning Department 95. Installation of new telephone lines shall be placed underground When feasible, overhead telephone lines shall be relocated to underground systems. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: 32 Future applicants Prior to issuance of certificates of occupancies Site inspection to verify underground placement of lines . : -A - Monitoring Agency: CULTURAL RESOURCES City Planning Depaz ent 96. The City shall require that sites proposed for future development be evaluated by certified archaeologists and/or paleontologists in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, if necessary. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: Future applicants Prior to appropriate future development approvals Plan check and review of cultural resources assessments City Planning Department 97. The City shall review status of all potential historic structures and features. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: LIGHT AND GLARE City Throughout implementation of General Plan City continue to review status City Planning Department 98.* The City shall review all future developments on a project -by -project basis and ensure that light and glare issues are considered. - Responsible for Implementation: - Monitoring Phase: - Method of Monitoring: - Monitoring Agency: 33 Future applicants Prior to appropriate future development approvals Plan check and review of land use and site Plans City Planning Department- 33 epartment