Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CRS 756 Corr
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE RECEIVED APPLICATION FORM City of Lake Llsinore J U N 7 8 2004 Planning Division 130 S.Mail street p qq����p��yy pp��^�a [��q- LakeElsmOre,CA92530 PLAlY1�1k1�l17! ®E` 1� (909)674-3124 (909)471.1419 fax APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: Name: PrL6eP-TD 406r+Mu.l Name: 301AW Ur-E Company: SP► -Tfto Company: Address: Address: City/State/Zip: S►4+•r DlB,(eb 69 92J -3 City/State/Zip: Lc>s gaaE�-'ems �+A Yodoty Telephone: ( Telephone: ( . Fax Number: S 2,12— I v-&,q Fax Number: ( Z i 3 ) 9 FS- Z T I E-Mail: "r- A_Td &SPATf4C0.Q)M _ E-Mail: Please check all that apply 0 Minor Design Review 0 Freestanding Sign 0 Conditional Use Permit 0 Design Review-Commercial 0 Uniform Sign Program 0 Zone Change 0 Design Review-Industrial 0 Specific Plan General Plan Amendment 0 Design Review-Multi-Family 0 Tentative Parcel Map Variance 0 Design Review-Model Home Tentative Tract Map 0 Other Complex&Residential Dev. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 37q - 3/s- 33 GENERAL LOCATION OF PROJECT /ADDRESS: N F- 'W o 1 n/f�RS�CTra� R ,e.xvE1z-S12>a �72�vE Eta NO..�E/L D� Z� l �VE2SlDE ��� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 5LI Tnw vjRt r+(Fs tP.1 s4 &.-'FTED COMAWN IT.1 WITH C DIAPAD.) - PROJECT INFORMATION: Zoning: 1Z3-l$ General Plan Designation: Acreage- Gross: q pC25S Acreage-Net: q-96 nc_¢.!�ES Number of Buildings: SS Number of Units: !V-H Total square feet of building(s): AFFIDAVIT. r hereby cenzfy that tlx information famished abow is acaxate, true,and ca nw to the best ofrT knowledge or beW.. Applicant's Signature: Date: Co j�-13)W Type/Print Name: F}tz V-¢-"M 4rvywt Property Owner's Signature: Date: Type/Print Name: 'F'F By signing dlx a ozew consents to the prrxessing of dhe ab=request by the applicam A letter of adxriwtion fnxn the oze-rmay be subn,tttd in lieu of the praoerty amner's signawn eFsFN�F>FoF�F�F�F�F�F�F�FN��F�Fk'�F�fYr�F�F�>F�FYc>F7b>F>F>HFk->F�F�F�F�F�F>F�F>FsFsF�F>F>FsFsF>F>F�F�HFsF�F�F�FsF�FsF�F:FtF�F>:�NF�F�FtF�F>F�F�Fk�F��F�F�F�F�F�r�F>F�F>F�F�F�F�Fk'>F>F�FtF�F>F�,'-a,'->FN�'r�FoF�'r�F7FsFsFoFYr�F Date: CRS Number:_ 1 CJ — Project Planner: Project Number(s): General Application.Form No,PD 2000-00 Raisdjuly,2000 City of Lake Elsinore LA.E ...,CA 2530 Request forReiiew and Comments 130 S.Main Str= Cake Elsinore,CA92530 (951)674-3124 (951)471-1419f. The attached materials are being sent"to you for your,review and as an early notification that the follotiving project is being requested and processed by the;Cit�s Comtni pity Development Depaiunent. Please-review the proposed project based on your agency's/department area of interest,expertise,and/or Jurisdiction Your tons, oroncomments, recommenda tion a requestec so that they can be incorporated in::the initial project plancheck or staff:report,for this:pamctila case. z To: ❑ City Manager ® County Fire Department ❑EVMWD ❑Assistant City Manager ❑ County Planning Department ❑LEUSD ❑Director of Community Development ❑ County Health Department ❑SCE ®Director of Community Services ❑Riverside Transit Authority ❑Verizon ❑Director of Administrative Services ❑ City of Canyon Lake ❑The Gas Company ®Engineering Manager ❑ Caltrans District#8 ❑ Comcast Cable Co. ❑Building&.Safety Manager ❑US.Postmaster ❑ CR&RDisposal ❑Planning Manager ❑U.S.Fish&Wildlife Services ❑Elsinore Water District ❑L.E.Police ❑U.S.Army Corp of Engineers ❑Mosquito&Vector Control ❑CA Department of Fish&Game ❑ Other. ❑Riv.County Flood Control District Date: January 12,2005 From: Duane Morita,Senior Planner (951) 674 3124,ext.279 E-mail:dmorita@lake-elsm' ore.org Project Title: R No.2004-11. (please refer to this number when responding) CUP 2004-27 TTM(condo) 32674 GPA 2004-10 Applicant: Alberto Hamui/Spathco 4995 Murphy Canyon Rd.# 402 San Diego,CA 92123 Owner:John Lee Project Description: Reused Design Review consideration of a 54 unit Townhome Complex with common areas in a gated community on 4.95 acres. Project Location: The subject site is located at Riverside Drive&Eisenhower Drive(APN:379-315-033) Rep ILb February 1,2005 CRS.•757-DR/756--TTM/GPA-758 CDNR\/IENTS:(xo&ase arateshte#'e xy) Date: Name/Title: Telephone: e-mail.: Signature: Request for Review and Comments - Form No. PD 2000-27- Revised A ugust, 2004 Page 1 of 1 Request for Review and Comments Cl of Lake Elsinore �zeyawdake-elsin ore.org Planning Division 130 S.Maii$reef Like Elsinore,CA 92530 (909)67U124 (%9)471-1419 fax ch ��e�a -1-W, tc you fp i°review ant} a5 an early l�c�ti#cation that tl�e foilaivat c ar {e[i que c r-e�-Ievu the proposed fixoject bascci orr y rrr age��cy'sfdep�eut z e o resr expertise. o ie t fttrons are requested so that:they,e I3i.rncc rp ratcci in the u�tral To: ®City Manager ®County Fire Department ®EVMWD ®Assistant City Manager ❑County Planning Department ®LEUSD ®Director of Community Development ❑County Health Department ®SCE ®Director of Community Services ❑Riverside Transit Authority ®Vaizon ®Director of Administrative Services ❑City of Canyon Lake ®The Gas Company ®Engineering Manager ❑Cakrans District#8 ®Comcast ®Building&Safety Manager ®U.S.Postmaster ®CR&R Disposal ®Planning&Code Enforcement Manager ®U.S.Fish&Wildlife Services ®L.E.Police ❑U.S.Army Corp of Engineers ®Mosquito&Vector Control ❑CA Department of Fish&Game ®County Flood Control Date: July 13,2004 From: Duane Morita,Senior Planner (909) 674-3124 ext.279 Email:dniorita lake-elsinore.orQ Project Title: R.No.2004-11 (please refer to this numberubm responding under separate wz--r letter) CUP No.2004-27 TTM(condo)32674 GPA 2004-10 Applicant: Alberto Hamui/Spathco 4995 Murphy Canyon Rd. #402 San Diego,CA 92123 Owner:John Lee 1800 So.Menlo Ave.Los Angeles,CA 90006 Project Description: The applicant is requesting a Design Review,Tentative Tract Map(condo) and Conditional Use Permit for the purpose of constructing 54 Townhomes with common areas in a gated community on 4.95 acres. Applicant is also requesting a General Plan Amendment from General Commercial to Medium Density Residential. Project Location: The proposed project will be located at Riverside Dr.&Eisenhower Dr.(APN:379-315-033) Reply bar July 27,2004 CRS:757 Design Review& Conditional Use Permit/756- Tentative Tract Map/758-General Plan Amendment Request for Review and Comments - Form No. PD 2000-27- Revised August, 2000 Page 1 of 2 COMMENTS: Date: Name/Title: Telephone: Signatwe: DEPOSIT /FEE RECEIPT COMMUNHY DEVELOPMENT`DEPARTMENT Pfia�iar I)ivisiort l305-tiGa'S� t,i1c Ekao.KG 92530 (909)64-3124 (909)E7T-t4t91,: .7T�s+r�y Name 1 Ct3� Tn *�/l�i Phone ).� Date,-C91 Z$/O4 GLy/State/zip s n mi'c> 2` z. 'roject Account I CRS 10 Project Deseriptioa D-f Pa. •-Cost Kee D"ofitS aDeseii tsan a; _ `� ;;`.':-Plitaiiitt ` O¢stoR _ t-;Et ""nc`eriu Dinisioii )D' 620-0O 261-OOM Az g—don Cofl&doaal Use Permit Desip Revicw Developaunt t Eaviroameatal - . Evumsioa of Tmic Gener2l Plza Amendment Oisss�e Cwasulrsni _ Pr Review Review of Technical Soxul:s Sio Pr ..specific Plsu Surface /Reclamatioa Plan T Use Permit- nal. Teaurive Parcel/ `ract Q`d Variznce Zone clunge Oiber Fees/De osits - "Desi ri lsori` ``Rinaiiirt 4R 100JO000-340-09-00 AppeAs F 100-0000-340-04-00 App4rarion of Abandompent D . W84MO-230-01-00 Cash Bond/Deposit/p Bond 1 100-0000-140-1 l-00 Copies of jt ms/Salc of s/Publications T 100-0000-340-11-00 Individual Conies: Fiat Copy 0 2.50 Additional Copies iI 100.0000-34"8-00 Eaviroameaul Fee AR 1044000-340-03-00 Extension of Time -h nor De Review 4R -100-0000-233-00-00 Fish&Game/Coua r,&ug Fee A 100-0000-340-07-00 Laadscape Review Fee: PLta(heck . 4096.. In ctiou 40% M 100-4441-414-:20-17 Posca e/UPS Rcirnhu meat )D I00.0004-340-06-00. Research/.Owner's N=e o..Parcel SpeciA SeiviceLeiter P 1004000-MG-26-00 S' Genital/T E F00 0000-320-24-00 T Use.Permits: Shoot Term - 4K 100-0000.340.06-00 Ocher Wlsocllaneous Fees Bi dlding Descrz In � Arnorait -Code"Eii orcemenl fees �. _ _ � .,. •,,.:., _;.- �.�.``=� _.�.- IF �' i00-0000-340-21-01 'Additional B Plan Cheek 'Hours, 117 I00-000o-340-20-30 r", �I 1004000-320-20-10 a: B E M P ►B I00-0000-340-1303 Nuisaiire Abatemenf ►B I004000-340-1302 .. Srtteazm Ahxer •+• kB i00-0000-340-1301 Weed Abatement 4R 100-( 0 3604M Interest lucurred TOT4L RECEIPT'` : Mi3cellaneous Fees.Not S eei ToR: ecei q :,- Ain0rit7t riverside Coumy Fire Depzmnmt Fee Received B )eposif /Fee Receipt -- Form No. PD 2000-31 .'ewsed July 2002 -- Page I of 1 FILE ALL FUTURE DOCUMENTS IN MASTER FILE RESIDENTIAL NO . R - 2004- 11 Subrrtittal Requimnazts- Checklist Rrnn ©for. lane ngDisimrc TENTATIVE PARCEL Planning Division 130 S.Man Sole[ AND TRACT MAP Eake(9 not,CA 92i30 (909)674-3124 (909)471-1419 fax "e p�rrposc of ids form is tt infazrrr applicants of e l aslc siz rxuttal,recluii-ownts iii or r to,, staff > a �ztely analyze and zoc es a l end"Itive X-we l or, Oitative'1 rac-t Map apT) aeon i41 /A Tctatreoretatty fracc Nlappplic xtiol�u iIl not,be sehedtled:£cr Plai�'i�i1�g Commission d one cozy �deratioxi a«ti1 all requu eel in arrr anon loos en cletexrxi necl tU be coanplt tc arid �� e~��' ���ollc�wt� .is rec` reel t3l�c'stbrru�tcrl at tl�e t1zp�of_ap}� �-attoii� ;` _ mom. e..��� �.. 1. 0 Preliminary Review Only: It is recommended that the applicant submit three (3) copies of the proposal for Prelmzmay Raiew prior to final submittal. In this manner, specific concerns may be addressed at an early state, thereby avoiding delays in latter stages of the approval process. This preliminary submittal will also facilitate preparation of the required environmental assessment. Fee:$2,500.00 2. 0 Fee/Deposits: Tentative Parcel Map- Planning Division $5,000.00 plus Engineering Division $2,900.00 and a separate check payable to the Riverside County Fire Department for $1,063.00; Residential Parcel Ma Planning Division $3,000.00 plus Engineering Division $2,500.00; Tentative Tract Map- Planning Division $13,500.00 plus Engineering Division " $4,500.00 and a separate check payable to Riverside County Fire Department for $1,063.00, Note.•Contcict the Engw&mg and the Building Safety Divtsxw to deorrmre oiler related and rtgrl fps assocucta�with yrnn-prvJ�x 3. Completed Application Form. 4. 0 Information to support compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),which shall consist of one(1)of the following. a. Determination by the Planning Division that the project is categorically exempt. Submittal Requirements for Tentative Parcel and Tract Map- Form PD 2000-08- Revised August, 2001 Page 1 of 5 1� b. One (1) copy of completed Environmental Assessment Form and substantiating documentation to support preparation of a Negative Declaration along with appropriate fees. C. Draft Environmental Impact Report has been prepared under the direction of the Planning Division. 5. L 7 Five (5) sets of plans drawn to scale and fully dimensioned, indicating Al of the information described below. All plans shall be stapled together in sets and in the order described below.These sets shall be folded to a maximum size of 8-1/2"x 12'. ae' Tract or Parcel Map Number assigned by County Surveyor/Engineer. r. Sufficient legal description of the land included on the map to define the boundaries of the tentative map. c../ Name,address,and phone number of subdivider. d �I Name;address,and phone number of preparer of map. e.---' Name, address, and phone number of owner, together with affidavits consenting to the filing of the tentative map. f. North avow and scale of map (one-inch equals 50 feet (preferred) or one-inch equals 100 feet.) 9',M'` Date map was prepared. h.- Total number of lots proposed and the overall average lot size. Names, addresses, and phone numbers of proposed utility companies serving the site. A vicinity or area map showing the existing major street pattern and.major water courses, and flood control channels within one-half mile of exterior boundaries of the subdivision. k.-'- All boundary lines of the subdivision with appropriate bearings and distances described with identifying tree rows,dikes,or channels. Existing buildings or structures identified by use, including those within 100 feet of tract boundary,noting if they are to remain or be removed me-"" All water courses, if applicable, identify the 100 year flood plain (base Flood Level) on the map. Submittal Requirements for Tentative Parcel and Tract Map- Form PD 2000-08- Revised August, 2001 Page 2of5 f are proposed to be installed, and of the time at which such improvements are proposed to be completed cc_' f Proposed method of sewage disposal. dd°O Sewer connection point. ee.,,-,-'_ Existing and proposed zoning and general plan designation of property to be divided ffg!'A Appropriate net acreage of each lot containing an area of one acre or more. gg.fir' Proposed use of all lots. hha/ If private streets are proposed, the method by which their maintenance will be accomplished and financed. ii. Such other information as the City Engineer, Community Development Director, Planning Commission, or City Council determines is necessary to properly consider the proposed division,including,but not limited to,proposed grading- 6. Provision of future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. Refer to Government Code Section 66473.1 (Subdivision Map Act). 7. � Copies of grant deeds for the existing parcel(s). S. Preliminary Title Report. 9. If the material listed above cannot be placed on the tentative map, then a report containing the material shall be submitted with the map. 10 0 If the proposed map is not being submitted in conjunction with a proposed development or previously approved development, an illustrative plan shall be submitted demonstrating that the property can be developed in accordance with City Standards. 11. d A reproducible reduction of the map,not to exceed 8-1/2 x 11" in size. 12. A colored exhibit distinguishing subdivided parcels, roads, slopes, open space, landscaping, remainder parcels,etc.,at least 24"x 36". Submittal Requirements for Tentative Parcel and Tract Map- Form PD 2000-08- Revised August, 2001 Page 4 of 5 Existing and future adjacent streets with widths of right-of-way and proposed connections to existing streets. o. Proposed street grades. p. .- "-'Proposed street cross-sections. q.,.� Centerline radii of all street curves. r_ Adjoining property lines and land uses,including adjacent tract numbers,if any. S. The drainage,areas tributary to the land division and a pre4minary plan of proposed on-site and off-site drainage system. t. All proposed lot lines and dimensions. U. The width and approximate locations of all existing and proposed easements for railroads, flood-control channels, public utilities, or other easements of right-of-way. v. Grading pattern including adjacent land- W. Existing trees having a trunk diameter of 4 inches or more. x. Locations of all streets, easements, pedestrian ways, trails, and other lands, whether for public or private purposes, to be dedicated or offered for dedication. y. Location of lands intended to be dedicated for parr purposes and/or statement as to whether fees are proposed to be paid in-lieu therefore. z. The location of existing wells, water lines, cesspools, sewers, culverts, drainpipes, underground structures, or sand, gravel, or other excavations with the land division and within. two hundred feet (200) of any portion of the subdivision noting thereon whether or not they are to be abandoned,removed or used aa. The contour of the land at intervals of not more than two feet(2)if the general slope of the land is less than ten percent (10%) or if not more than five feet (5) if the general slope of the land is more than ten percent (10%). All elevations shall be based on U.S.G.S. datum, or other datum acceptable to the City Engineer. Copies of U.S.G.S.maps are not acceptable. bb:--, Type of improvement, including but not limited to streets, drainage, water sewer, grading, utilities, pedestrian ways, streetlights, and tree planting,which Submittal Requirements for Tentative Parcel and Tract Map- Form PD 2000-08-Rezrised.August, 2001 Page 3 of 5 ,P-Following review of the application and prior to scheduling the project for Planning Commission, staff will notify the applicant to submit the following items. 13. 0 Twenty(20) sets of complete plans showing all information labeled in Item 5 as well as any additional information required by the Planning Commission. 14. 0 A reproducible reduction at approximately 8-1/2 x 11" in size of all plans. 15. 0 Three (3) sets of typed gummed address labels containing the book, block, parcel number,names and addresses of the owner for all parcels within a 300-foot radius of the exterior boundaries of the subject parcel A copy of the Assessor's Parcel Maps illustrating the 300-foot radius and an affidavit certifying that this information was completed from the latest available assessment roll (specify the year) shall accompany these labels. Please nor wAr to check-ollist i&=at appluation suhmiad 0.. A copy of this checklist form shall be submimiwith the application. Submittal Requirements for Tentative Parcel and Tract Map- Form PD 2000.08- Revised August, 2001 Page 5 of 5 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 S.Main Street lake Elsinore,CA 92530 (909)674-3124 (909)471-1419 fax Date Filed: GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Developer or Applicant: 2. Contact Person: _-&4�T-T. 3 }MtA1 _- 3, Address: _ City: mm AN State: Telephone: /el v C,<J-Ze2 Cz- Y✓ 5. Identify any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project including those required by the City, regional, State, Federal agencies, not including approvals from the City, fire department, sheriffs department, and Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District: ei2lJ ,/=� ,� t✓ �,•� �x7r��Gti1 � /fi��ZZVZ:5:� Ac' Z'LlAzo J�Ae ��/vCJr) b. Proposed Use of Site (project described in this form): z 7. Surrounding Land Uses: y��✓r -��.Jia �iw7A L 8. Site Size: -,-o-1•Af ,4�'/2� s 9. Number of Floors of Construction: ,y�-G .r��3• � T 10. For Residential Development. Number of Units: _::5 � Unit Sizes: Units per Acre: /�G� Lot Sizes: Number of Required Parking: /2 a 11. For Commercial and Other Development. Type of Development: Scale of Development (neighborhood, City-wide, regionaI): Number of Buildings: ,� Size of Buildings: Number of Parking: - �ai- ..� i'vi+ "d'r�"-i"�-wear• g_ :�^ om 12. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural or scenic aspects. 13. Describe any existing structures onsite, and use of these structures. 14. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. 15. Describe the typed of surrounding land use, intensity of land use, and sale of development. 2 Environmental Infomration Form-Fonn No.PD 2000-19 R,md April 2002 16. Discuss all items checked"yes"(attach additional sheets as necessary): YES NO A. Change existing features of the lake or substantial alteration to hills or of ground contours? A- B. Change scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads? Y C. Change pattern, scale or character of general area? D. Increase air emissions or ground water or any stream? X E. Alter water quality or quantity of lake or ground Water or any stream? x F. Increase existing noise levels? G. Is site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more? H. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? I. Change in demand for public services and utilities (police, fire, water,sewer, etc.)? CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. ' DATE: fo V 3 Ermrornnmul Information Fonn-Form No.PD 2000-19 Revisal April,2002 MACHADO ST S 37*00'58" W 395.70' o ' FLSITE i o R ME DR OR LAKE r. VECINI;f MAP Z Z , Cn (lt o NET LOT AREA: 4.80 ACRES o 0 32281 RIVERSIDE DR. o LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 w + > c w w Q V V r 2W I O Z Lj V/ W 130' N 37'00 58 E 395.59 0 RIVERSIDE DR. CIVIL ENGINERR/LAND PLANNER LAWRENCE 0. MC DERMOTT 18075 LaVENTANA MURRIETA, CA. 92562 909-304-0111 Fax 909-696-5218 e mail Imcd0070earthlink.net i� 06/26/2004 11:18 FAX _ Z 002 Pale 1 of 1 COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE E 8,200d t1:0$:15 am PST Report driglnation ID:06-001 3755 S1DE CdUNTY 2003.04 TAX ROLL Customer Service Request APN 3TO-315-033-0 PAYMENTS AS OF 06/1112004 TRA 005.028-CITY OF LAKE ELSINOREc Legal 4.95 ACRES MIL IN LOT 164 M$1111059 TR 13799 Situs 32281 RIVERSIDE DR Mall 190o S MENLO AVE LOS ANGELES CA 90006 Acq.Date.Doe No. 0212000 : 0038237 Assessed owner LEE JOHN Assessed Values Taxes tat Half 2nd Half Land 710,315 status "PAID— "PAID" Improvements 79,590 Payment Date 11/26/2003 03/31/2004 Total Tax 11,132.64 Tax Install 5,566.32 5,566.32 Penalty 556.63 576.63 Balance Due .00 .00 Net 795,905 Total Taxes Due AO Special Assessments Included In Tax Amounts Fund Type Descrlpilon Amount 68-2351 LNDSCP/LTO LNDSCPn.IGHT MAINT DIST 1,857.74 68-1363 FLOOD CONY ZONE 3 A'SMNT DISTRICT 44.84 66-2371 MISC ABATE LAKE ELSINORE NUISANCE ABATEMENT 427.92 68-1377 fL00D CONT NPDES-SANTA ANA 222,74 68-1B67 MISC ASMNT COUNTY{SERVICE AREA FEE 117.92 88-5360 MISC ASMNT MWD STANDBY-WEST 45.68 68-4671 MISC ASMNT NUN MOSQUITO/VECTOR CONTROL. 21.20 Total Of Special Assessments 3,125.04 Additional Property Information TAX CODE USE CODE VESTING Put CODE ACREAGE STAMP AMOUNT TAX RATE 000 C1 SM C14 4.00 825.00 F 1.00610% Reference Notice$ e BILL:000168269 End Of Report file://C:\Program%20Files\BackWeblNewSTS\httnl\0\report1900.htmi 6/28/2004 06/28/2004 11: 18 FAX 0 003 peQ. Iar s Go* T r.>,t pssd tt-cordwd In orriesaL Reeera. County of RlyalrOide AND WMFN AF-GORDED MAIL M Gary 4, Rrlao Asaewor. CAaInty Cligeh 3 R.carder John k8LS . 11111111APR- 1111IEill A L.A., CA 313MS u s u a fw+ a.0 to { rtoa wcoK t+a rec A'I R L cOo1' cd.��wll4 Ir+.O G.er L504pW NV. 109HU-NK TITLE ORDER NO. 50-3111563.70 R INDIVIDUAL GRANT DEED APAJ 379'3i5-0 J THE VNDERSICSNED GRANTOR(S) DECLAREW DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX is $ _825'.00 (XI computed on full value of property conveyed, or T [ I computed an full value less value of (ions or enoumbran m ces remaining at time of Sale. [ ( ) Unincorporated area )X I City of Lake Elsinore, AND FOR A VALUABLE CONSIE)FRATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, RODI3RICK R. HIJOBARD hereby GRANT(S) to: JOHN LEE, a Single Man the real property in the city of take Etsinvre, County of State of California, described as: Lot 154 In Tract No. 13799 as Per Map recorded in Book 111, Pages 59 to 63 inclusive of Maps, in the Otnr,e of the County Recorder of R-fveraideCounty, California. AE50 KNOWN AS: 32281 Riverside Dr., Lake Elsinore, CA A-P. # 379-315-033-0 DAVF0 January i2�2000 STATE OF EA"W;)X N C)1.VZ"'M COUNTY OF1ZV,7 7 r. L public in and for r.�q State pCf3anally eppaprad Roca4 tCK. CL �_yvib SA S peraehbliy kh6wn t0 my for proved to ma on the Sasie of aplistagwry evidancal to oa the vatyon(a)-ho"namar9t , r islaresubacribed:o the wlthin(naieuvneni And ockr.Jvdgod _ - 17 mo Shot hal$hollhay eaacuted the Same 1n hielher/thair euthor4ap cayacitylies), and That by hlelherrtheir s,gnature(st �LPA - AUS Ells an the instrument tho poraOrr(sl,ar the entity upon bahalr of _ whit;h tho parzon(s1 ac[od,axaculed the mstrumeht. 1' WITNESS my nand and OIOC,el said. �•-��r'o4O`�,' •rr..r. (Tf+ia e.eo for onc�ut nwtonal so�q Mali San statement$to: John tea CA Descripttau: Rlveralde,cA Document-Year.DoCID 2000.30237 Page: 1 of I Order: 06-28-2004 11-13-48 AM COalalenti TEDDY 06/28/2004 11:19 FAX 0 004 --,.NWTH AMERICAN TITLE Ca r r RECORDING REOUESTFO gY: l Page S of Z VnITod Ezicrow Ce. Reaardsd In Offlcdal Bacardi Cotvtlty of R'drarslds AND"gN RECORDED MAIL TO: Gary L. Orme pipeaarior.. Cawnty Clark R gmao}�rtd`orl l Mr./Roderick R. Hubbard ll 11I111 111111111111111111�� IQ I9i91I}�+1 �� prinHull lhl 11111111111111111 111111111111111111 Colorado Springs, CO 80920 P 9 r- , WX 1,� t u , P. .con arc q - — I Bl. A, !' A L cant �nC Rrn,.o tree t.Al� 6SCRQW NO. 188EItI.NK 1• TITLE ORDER NO.36-38593.70 SHORT FORM DEED OF TRUST AND ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS INDIVIDUAL � THIS GEED OF TRUST.rnedo Jenue7 76. 2000,barweeti I A.P.a 379 315 033 O JONN LEE, fr Single Aran, haro:n enQod YAUSTDR, � I whosa add-11 io 1900 S. Mento Ave., Lou Anpet fi,CA P0006 and North American Title Company, o Callternim Corporation,herein ruills41 TRUSTEE.AND RODERICK R.htIA"AD,a Married Men,an his*ale and i*Petals Arpparty, heroin called BENEFICIARY, � j W)TNESSETH: That Truator iFIREVOCApLY GRANTS,TRANSFERS AND ASSIGNS to TRUSTEL IN TRUST,WITH POWER OF SALE that Property in Pr I,rr' 4* County_ Cafifomo,dmc i&—d": Lot 184 In T►set No. 137a4 a■■n6wo t7y—ap on file In Book 7T7,Pagan b8 10 03 UlCltylr■of Maps,to The 011rq of the County Recorder o1 RiverNd*bouncy, Canfernla. ; Ir TOGETHER WITH tho rent*,issues and prolit9 thereof,SUILIECT: HIt!}fEVER, to the dgM,power and authority given to and Confarfad upon Bonalisiery by paragraph 410 incayyoretad r.orvin try tolerance to collect and apply such rants, iasuaft and profits. I For the Purpose of Securing: 1, Performance of aaph apreehieni of blister inCorporotod by roferome or contained heroin, 2, Payment of the indebtedness evidenced by ano promisaary noie of even dote herewith,and Any oatonvan of ranmwal thereof,in the p6nci.4a)aum of 6 470,00¢00 executed by Truster 1n favor of Bmnafi6ory er order. 3. Peymont of such furihor Sume os the Won,rocofd owner of maid praporty may tmr/ow from flanaliClarv,Wean evidenced by another note for nolazi roritimp it is so socured. i DATED January 26. 7000 f S)CNATURE OF TRUSTOR: STATE OF CALiFORMA COUNTY OF t ' On v I 6i .I personally known to mm to,Pro.,a6 to ma on the best of� 501MIActory evitlan") to be the parsonis)whose namets;' ierere AUBscribod to 1h0 within instrument and oeknowjQdVa4 TO me that hefahaJthey eke CUtad thn sama In hia)harlthalrl t i Authorized capacltyliasl, and that by hlaiher/=hair srgngwra(a) on tho Inau umant the porsontsi,91 tho antlly upon bohati of which the poraunis! seibd.a■acUlod the instrument, f WITNESS my hand and official aeal. i I NMICv H tm.A - Camlrort 6 1 I M290 Los Ar17Qe*Co,,• - Sipnmtura I MyCa�n t�tJsh�to�,O i Nafrfe ITrPad or pr.ntodi lThre rr .1nr Ihcrnl nol nrret oat I I I I �. i666 It I I I I Description: Riverslde,CA DOC-0nt-Yedr,DOC1D 20 0-36239y1P49ra: 1 of 2 Order: 06-26-2004 11-13-49 AM ComIDBYit: 7liDDY �'' 6 06/28/2004 11:19 FAX L0005 .J FTo protect the Soeurltl<of YNd Do"of Trust,Tfustor AQiow-El•th4 Rrtecutron and delivery of five Deed of Tryst and the note secured hereby,their provisions 411 t0 114).inckmvill.of t4 l/GGuouildeed of trust recorded in Sanin FL%rbara County an!Snn ant! COLT.:Oa7=7 1 C. l:w+,—1 ill oil uther eounues 1:elo+i T:l.196�7.�in the crook and at the pago of OffiCtat Records in the office or the county recorder of The cou,%Ty where said propelty.rallo !&441. aired belovil apposite the name of 5ut:h county,viz,; Ti County Bool+ Page County Book 'Papa, Clovnty Book Pape Courtly goo► Page Aramndn 435 094 King* 792 833, Rrdacer - 89S 301 Slerre 29 335 Alpine 1 250 Lake 362 39 P�1r" 1S1 S Sraklvou 488 181 Arnador 104 34 Laalen 171 'd,71 I ritrlersrde 3005 523 Solano 1105 182 Bute 1145 1 Los Angeles T2455 899• acramrmo a331 62 Sonoma 1551 689 Cafaveraa 145 1S2 Madera 810 )70 a�j4'�errnilo 271 363 Slaniarau6 1 715 458 Cnluet. 206 617 Merin 1500 •339 i Sran Somardino 5567 61 Sutter s72 297 Contra Costa 3978 47 Mariposa 77• 292 Stan Frenc.acv A332 .905 Tehema a01 289 DN hivriv 76 eta Mandocirw 579 530 j 5r1 n.loaouln 2d70 all Trinity 93 age Eldorano 86t3 456 Mereed 1$47 536 S&A Lu.a Obmpo 1 1S t 12 Tulare 2294 275 Fresnn 4620 572 M940c 194 asi 5 rf MatrrO 4070 .420 T.,etumrm 135 47 Glenn 422 184 Mono 52 ass S'I`erfa 9arbaro 1679 860 Vertturp 2062 306 ffurnbotdt 657 527 fdonterey 2196 6313 ; S rite Clare 6338 341 Ybto 1553 245 lmperiat 1097 Sol Napa 639 8S t ? Sprits Crur ta37 dg4 rubs 334 age taro 747 fi88 NowvOs 303 320 Shasta 604 528 Kern 3427 60 Orange Sass 61, 1 Spn Diego Series 2 Book 1961 Page 183897 twhich provisions,identical in all coun{ies.are printod an the rovefse rgtereorl hereby Ara Adapted and Ineorpormad heratn one made e part hereal As fully as though sat torch haraf+l at length; {Ifat kw1wifilabserve and pertorin said provisions; and that the rafprenCea To property.obwfladons, and parties in said provisions if"ll Co conut, d to rarer to the prerrerty obligations, and porlioa set forth in this Qgad of Trust. The un6eraipnod Truster requests that a COpY at any Notec0 It OcillBull and of any Notice of Sale hereunder be mailed to him At his address hwelnbeford eat forth, REQLfEST fOR'FULL RECONVEYA►tiCE TO be used only,when noiq has been peed To North American Title Company, Trustee: I IfII Dated The underr..pned,a the toga owner and holder nl all IndrbtLd.'nscs'sec4Id by the within prod al Tr„cr All sam%sn•:urrtd h smn DQ(ld of Tfuat h,we boon lolly pJ.d inn SatiEhgd, ;tnd you w4d bp`►tl- 1`Qurstml rind tAMCtrA,tin , I e� pAVm1Cn1 in y.,,.nh ltn•f,tumii owing 10 You under the terms of sh.d L)rntl of Truitt, fo canCaf ill 6y.Yn+tt►�01 tntlnhretlnpaa, zt•,:ur m1 by nala Donis of Tru51, dolwared to you hirra—th IOpalhet with aetd Dced of Tfust�itnd to rre terms of �Onvt±y, w>lhput warranty. {o the narrm;(ur.atQnntod by the said Daed al Trust. the estate nnw held by You urlder ifrr I MAIL RECONVEVANC£ TO: E i Do wet lose or d.:tray rh,n owed of Trutt Det'Ttf gets wh,.vh it snrurt•s. 8o1n must fit. dahvered to the TTustoe lot tAA'c6ll/iron(apllflorn fecnnvevanva wart tiro. mane. 3 fill1i11 I I11 II��tllil1111I8, lilt 111i111f�11i11�1f��1 I, ; Description: R1Vers3de,CA DOCUMOnt-Year-DOCSD :200�.3823 !I age: ,2 of 2 Order: 06-28-2004 12-23-4$ AM Comment: TEDDY I. I 'Fs CIO Comm ,� Fda •.. r,L 5 05 8 G'R•M r, s4.2e'T iid• a d;� reap 0e O 2 fP 1�� F`.n •����y"c a v Q p0 9� '4��as• *h� iv r, n CS+O� 0• t. 4h�• �tC 3 ' Utility 80 - 96 401 4 ' & 6 ' 4V[ it 80 -- 158390 P p y 12 ' Uti [ itpy 80 - 198482 T OUP Pg �/J4� ICP Ile • .00 GQ /�o. 9•• � tiga� '�� �G .ems ,,,_ /, �, �� s 'Doss `` � 1�1 ','f'"2 •�F �F"y Y' / 0o0 ` s r� '�' ���•�� V� /This plat l i ovided fo 'nfgtil tional p W 0 Y. tho info'" Atiogxon ned ids believe cfit�6e curd e, it is n .a ranteed t> is Compa ;w�and should lcot�sidered as being rt of "$olft Re ort,- I der, Goa t 25r other , product i g y this Cct gy to ahl t ttached' cb "s�,ohJ a x3 73 a�14 'sb y J, .Y ti Q d - - 379-09 bPOR. SEC. 3, r6S, R.5W. r/z,a.aos-ozB .3�9-,3/ C a � Q .. (p K14 mI SZ'59"/7"N1zra.,O. SdD jw 110 O-° Q 107 n 740 7/ /2 /t4 30 34 /f/ O, ' ® !06 :J _' 75 O 30• 3o w/.t.if® ^ /43 °w 112. 4O, ® /05 76 154_ T7O 69 " T /r:.•6i.© � ^ ' ® •IN It1/4 6O. Q /03 78© 67 7 nt•Y O 8 R 4.95AF� K © 140 115 O. � ® /QP - 790 O �39 116 ® A7V BOO I/7 ® 100 • BJ 9 ®� , ^1 i0 / .] /o n ® 9�/S 96 `'� '° OOL•r i//i3{5 ^ { 1 i2�0e./abj l'3 : 9sl�l7 nl DS9B I�4a11O l3 ASsa T. JJ Je ��33 )o T 85 � 14 J6 JT JB• /9` E7• PJ 2 iP]3S+�2i-4]•J ZS 26 2aT a. 3 s2 @,9586 O 123 15 s � Z 1* ,.1 cif' 11 r, JV' ,o a1. 7a• J. /St 40 087/ ?9 ° — arI a _ _ 7.17•81' EISEWOH ER©� /...1• "� A/63.Oa'ota�aJ OR !}s']U• 93 BB /3! /3 92 56 55 ?,!S!O 479•' !4/6 ,.• 4Tr 4a3. 4s/ 4!3, 4a2t 4i1t• 4s0t a. 35� 3s4° t3r�3®® TD •k: ,5'0 V.Tf n/+ rL 4a T as s/ ao m a. st ,. a/ ,D ,. a• a/ ,• ,. t• �. a. ,. v 3/2 3/3 D,lt- 09 3/4 M B. ////59-63 TraO No. 13799 ° 111168-70 " ' /4586 ASSESSORS MAP BK 379 PG 3/ RIVERS/OE GOUNTr,, CALIF. MAR ILOR CW - I, THE PLANNING CENTER r i 1 1 loe 014 �SOO g�i�r' ° t �© 10 -Nate- MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM RIVERLAKE VILLAS TENTATIVE PARCEL N0,32674 SCH#2005061138 i t prepared for: 1 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE i Contact: Linda Miller, Associate Planner prepared by: THE PLANNING CENTER Contact: William Halligan, Esq. Director of Environmental Services JULY 2005 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM RIVERLAKE VILLAS TENTATIVE PARCEL NO.32674 R-: SCH#2005061138 07 prepared for: _ .. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 South Main Street Contact: Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Linda Miller, Tel: 909.674.3124 Associate Planner Fax.- 909.674.2392 prepared by: = THE PLANNING CENTER A.. 1580 Metro Drive Contact: William Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Halligan, Esq. Tel: 714.966.9220 • Fax: 714.966-9221 Director of Environmental E-mail:costamesa@planningcenter.com Services Website: www.planningcenter.com COL-04 JULY 2005 ti � ! � � � ��/� (V Contents »,`^v � ` 8��� ^ ` i Table of � . ,~o~..e..~= � 1. U '---- , ,,~~~~~~_________________�'� 1.1 PURPOSE OFM0GAT0N MONITORING PROGRAM 14 ' --'.-------------.. 1 � INITIAL SUMMARY 1 1 � . . ---------------.-------------' 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION ......................................................................................................1-2 2. MITIGATION MONITORING PROCESS...............................................................................2-1 21 K80OG/QlON MONITORING AGREEMENT--------'_--'---- 2-1 � 2.2 K8[OG/�lONPNON[[OR|N(� PROGRAM ORGAN|Z/�lON---------------'2,1 2.3 CO-y OF LAKE EU]|NORE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT------'2'1 2.4 MITIGATION MONITORING COMMITTEE.......................................................................24 2.5 K4RlGAT|DN MONITORING TEAM...................................................... ............................2'1 2.6 RECOGNIZED EXPERTS .................................................................................................2'2 ' [ � 27 ARBITRATIONIDISPUTE RESOLUTION...........................................................................2'2 � 2.8 EN ............................. ..................................... ............................................2'2 � 3. MITIGATION MONITORING REQUUREMENTS~~~~~~~~-'-------'--'-'-~~~~.~~~~.'---�-1 � 3 3.1 PRE-MITIGATION MEETING..... ......................................................................................O4 � 3.2 CATEGORIZED MITIGATION MEASURES/MATRIX........................................................3-1 � 33 IN-FIELD MONITORING...................... .............................................................................3-1 3'4 DATA BASE MANAGEMENT............................................................................................3'1 � 3.5 COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTORS ------------------------3'1 - 3.0 LONG-TERM MONITORING.............................................................................................D'1 4. MITIGATION MONITORING REPORTS................................................................................4-1 4.1 FIELD REPORT8----------.. 4-1 � ----_--------------------� 4.3 PLAN CHECK CONFORMANCE REPORTS -----------------------44 � � 4.3 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLIANCE REPORT UCFU..........................................................4-1 � 4.4 ARBITRATION/EN F{}RCEk8 ENT REPORT(AER) --------------------44 , 5. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT............................................................................................... -1 5`1 COMMUNITY COORDINATION........................................................................................5'1 .. � r . � . ~ x� � ^ � � R6mmlakx Villas Initial StudylMND City m'Lake Elsinore wPage 1 � Mitigation Monitoring k � Program ,� Table of Contents This page intentionally left blank. f Page ii The Planning Center July 2005 I Introduction 1.1 PURPOSE OF MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM This Mitigation Monitoring Program has been developed to provide avehicle by which to monitor mitigation measures and conditions of approval outlined in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, State Clearinghouse No.2005061138.The Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared in conformance with Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code and City of Lake Elsinore Monitoring Requirements.Section 21081.6 states: Section 1.Section 21081.6 is added to the Public Resources Code,to read: 21081.6. When making findings required by subdivision (a) of Section 21081 or when adopting a negative declaration pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 21081, the public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes to the project which it has adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. For those changes which have been required or incorporated into the project at the request of an agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the project, that agency shall, if so requested by the lead or responsible agency, prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring report. Section 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIllB of the California Constitution because of the local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act. The first component of the program satisfies the need to commit that the mitigating features added to the project through the environmental process have been incorporated into the plans, actual construction and operation of the project. The second component is that of providing the �� agency with information concerning the accuracy of impact predictions and the effectiveness of mitigation measures. This second component is not required by Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 but is necessary to enable agencies to improve their environmental procedures and protect the environment pursuant to directives provided through the California Environmental Quality Act. The Mitigation Monitoring Program will serve to document compliance with adopted/certified mitigation measures which are formulated to minimize impacts associated with the construction of the proposed project. 1,2 INITIAL STUDY/MND SUMMARY The proposed project consists of a General Plan Amendment to allow forthe development of 51 single-family townhouse units within the City of Lake Elsinore. The project also consists of a Conditional Use Permit for the entitlement of the residential project, and a Tentative Tract Map. The entry to the project is located off of Riverside Avenue,on the southern boundary of the project site.The development will contain 102 garage spaces and 127 open spaces,for a total of 229 parking spaces. The proposed plan includes two-story, three bedroom dwelling units ranging in size from 1,291 square feet to 1,522 square feet. The proposed project site contains open lawn areas intended for passive uses, community barbecue areas, tot lots and pedestrian walkways throughout the site. Riverlake Villas Initial StudylMND City of Lake Elsinore •Page 1-1 Mitigation Monitoring Program 1. Introduction 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION The project site is located within the City of Lake Elsinore, in the western portion of Riverside County, in Southern California. More specifically, the project site consists of a 4.95 acre parcel of undeveloped land located in the north western portion of the City, directly south of Riverside Drive. Surrounding land uses include residential uses directly to the north and west.The.Leach Canyon Flood Control Channel forms the eastern border of the property, with residential uses located to the east of the channel. Page 1-2 •The Planning Center July 2005 2. Mitigation Monitoring Process 2.1 MITIGATION MONITORING AGREEMENT The Mitigation Monitoring Agreement will be provided through the City conditions of approval process,and reference compliance with this monitoring program. Provisions are included in the Agreement specifying monitoring and reporting requirements, scheduling, qualifications of mitigation monitors and specialists,agency fees,right of site access,dispute resolution,and penalties. The Agreement will include enforcement provisions and sanctions for more severe infractions, such as stop work orders, loss of further entitlement or restoration. The landowner would agree that the agency has the right to impose these sanctions pursuant to the contract and hold the agency harmless in enforcement of its provisions. The lead agency may also require that Mitigation Monitoring Agreements be executed between the landowner and appropriate responsible or trustee agencies. The use of Mitigation Monitoring Agreements will clarifythe assignment of responsibility,and havethe added benefit of improving the citizenry's confidence that agencies are committed to take actions to protect their environment. 2.2 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ORGANIZATION Overall mitigation monitoring program management is the responsibility of the City of Lake Elsinore Community Development Department. The Mitigation Monitoring Committee,comprised of the landowner, construction manager, and the environmental monitor, is responsible for program implementation and reporting requirements. The technical consultants(EIR consultant, project engineer,noise consultant,and WW1u traffic consultant)will perform related monitoring tasks under the direction of the environmental monitor(if contracted by the City). In the event of disputes regarding matters for which the City is the final authority,The Director of Community Development will be final arbiter in the event of a dispute. 2.3 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT The City of Lake Elsinore Community Development Department will serve as the program administrator, responsible for overall program management, mitigation monitoring clearances and coordination of the arbitration committee/responsible agencies, and the mitigation monitoring committee. The.Department is responsible for review of all monitoring reports, enforcement actions, and document disposition. 2.4 MITIGATION MONITORING COMMITTEE b: The mitigation monitoring committee is responsible for the day-to-day monitoring activities and reporting, and includes a representative from the landowner,construction manager, and the mitigation monitor. The monitoring committee holds regularly scheduled meetings to coordinate mitigation measure implementation, review compliance reports, and resolve in-field disputes. Unresolved disputes are forwarded to the ° arbitration committee. 2.5 MITIGATION MONITORING TEAM The mitigation monitoring team, consisting of the environmental monitor manager and technical subconsultants (EIR consultant, geologist/environmental assessor, project engineer, biologist, noise consultant, traffic consultant, and archaeologist), is responsible for monitoring the implementation/ Riverlake Villas Initial StudylMND City of Lake Elsinore •Page 2-1 Mitigation Monitoring Program 2. Mitigation Monitoring Process compliance with all adopted mitigation measures and conditions of approval. A major portion of the team's work is in-field monitoring and compliance report preparation. Implementation disputes are brought to the committee for resolution by the monitor, and if required,to the arbitration committee. The following summarizes key positions in the monitoring program and their respective functions: Monitoring Team • Technical Advisors: Responsible for monitoring in respective areas of expertise (EIR consultant, geologist/environmental assessor, project engineer, noise consultant, and traffic consultant). Directly reports to the environmental monitor. Monitoring Committee: Responsible for report review, and first phase of dispute resolution. • take Elsinore Community Development Department: Principal manager of the monitoring program. Responsible for coordination of mitigation monitoring committee,technical consultants, report preparation and dispute resolution. Responsible for overall program administration, participation on arbitration committee and document/report clearinghouse. • Lake Elsinore Department of Public Works: Responsible for review of final engineering plans in conformance with the Tentative maps,technical support, and compliance report preparation. • City Council: Responsible for implementation of corrective action, stop work orders and final arbitrator of disputes. 2.6 RECOGNIZED EXPERTS The use of recognized experts, as a component of the monitoring team and arbitration committee, is required to ensure compliance with scientific and engineering based mitigation measures. While the mitigation monitoring teams recognized experts assess compliance with required mitigation measures, responsible agency recognized experts consult with the arbitration committee regarding disputes. 2.7 ARBITRATION/DISPUTE RESOLUTION If the mitigation monitor identifies a mitigation measure which, in the opinion of the monitor, has not been implemented,or has not been implemented correctly,the problem will be brought for resolution before the mitigation monitoring committee for resolution. If the problem cannot be satisfactorily resolved by the committee,it will be brought before the Director of Community Development for resolution. The decision of the Director of Community Development is final, unless appealed to the Director or Planning Commission. The Director of Community Development, acting through a final vote of the City Council, will have the authority to issue stop work orders until the dispute is resolved. In the case of situations involving potential risk of safety or other emergency conditions,the Director of Community Development is empowered to issue temporary stop work orders until such time as Planning Commission or City Council review of the particular stop work matter becomes final. 2.8 ENFORCEMENT Public agencies may enforce conditions of approval through their existing police power, using stop work orders, fines, infraction citations, loss of entitlement, refusal to issue building permits or certificates of use and occupancy, or, in some cases, notice of violation for tax purposes. Criminal misdemeanor sanctions could be available where the agency has adopted an ordinance requiring compliance with the monitoring Page 2-2 •The Planning Center July 2005 2. Mitigation Monitoring Process program,similar to the provision in many zoning ordinances which state the enforcement power to bring suit against violators of the ordinance's provisions. Additional enforcement provisions could include required posting of a bond or other acceptable security in the amount of the required mitigation measures. In the event of non-compliance,the City could call the bond and complete the required mitigation measures. vn 4 �� N. f -I:y J Riverlake Villas Initial Study/MND City of Lake Elsinore Page 2-3 Mitigation Monitoring Program 2. Mitigation Monitoring Process This page intentionally left blank. Page 2-4 •The Planning Center July 2005 3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements 3.1 PRE-MITIGATION MEETING A pre-monitoring meeting will be scheduled to review mitigation measures, implementation requirements, schedule conformance, and mitigation monitoring committee responsibilities. Committee rules are established,and the entire mitigation monitoring program is presented and any misunderstandings resolved. 3.2 CATEGORIZED MITIGATION MEASURES/MATRIX Project-specific mitigation measures and conditions of approval have been categorized in matrix format,as shown in Table 3.1-1. As shown,the matrix identifies the environmental factor,specific mitigation measures, schedule, and monitor. The mitigation matrix will serve as the basis for scheduling the implementation of, and compliance with, all mitigation measures and conditions of approval. 3.3 IN-FIELD MONITORING Project monitors and technical subconsultants shall exercise caution and professional practices at all times when monitoring implementation of mitigation measures. Protective wear(hard hat/glasses)shall be worn at ` all times in construction areas. Injuries shall be immediately reported to the mitigation monitoring committee. F. 3.4 DATA BASE MANAGEMENT All mitigation monitoring reports, letters, memos,shall be prepared utilizing Microsoft Word 2000 software on r IBM compatible PC (currently in use by the Lake Elsinore Community Development Department). ` 3.5 COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTORS y The construction manager is responsible for coordination of contractors, and is responsible for contractor completion of required mitigation measures. 3.6 LONG-TERM MONITORING Long-term monitoring relating to several mitigation measures will be required, including fire safety %5. inspections. Post-construction fire inspections are conducted on a routine basis by the Riverside County Fire Department(RCFD). d..ii Riverlake Villas Initial StudylMND City of Lake Elsinore Page 3-1 Mitigation Monitoring Program w 3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements This page intentionally left blank. Page 3-2 The Planning Center July 2005 3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements Table 3.1-1 Responsible for Timing ! M trgation .-/nn'�F t(71-::1,.,-3.yryyL,:i�.,1y+i �1{'.,,.,.;,.:,,:::,.�`i(i,3:.i}�!i i��r'i.,l;I�.?(,�d i•ti:�14,(S-g.l 3���y I 4.u.:..i�i f,�.t.'il,.ihir..Sur.,1�l t': 4a�F'..-I1Eii<dV,,...�l r��� Measure >..e_ Monitor ing Completion : mil {«F 5.1-1 The proposed project shall,during construction, include control measures for light emission and light pollution associated with new Public Works construction and associated light fixtures.The proposed project shall adhere to the County of Riverside Ordinance No,665—Regulating De partme nVEngi nee ring Light Pollution,and implement the following measures: Division,Community 1. On-site buildings shall use low reflective glass and building material to keep daytime glare to a minimum. Development Department/Building Division 2. All exterior lights shall be shielded where feasible and focused to minimize spill light into the night sky or adjacent properties. 3. New exterior lighting used for security purposes in the evening would be limited to low-wattage,energy-conserving night lighting. 4. New lights would be situated and arranged so that no direct beam would leave the project site. Luminaries shall be provided with filtering louvers and hoods.During installation,the luminaries shall be aimed and corrected by a field crew to aim the lights away from viewers. 5.2-1 Underthe Statewide General Construction NPDES Permit(Order 92-08-DWQ),the project proponent must submit a Notice of Intent(NOI)to Public Works Department the State Water Resources Control Board prior to the commencement of construction activities. In addition, a SWPPP must be prepared and implemented at the project site,and revised as necessary as administrative or physical conditions change. The SWPPP must describe Best Management Practices (BMPs)that address pollutant source reduction and provide measures/controls necessary to mitigate potential pollutant sources. The general categories of BMPs include erosion controls,sediment controls,tracking controls,wind erosion control, non- storm water management,and materials and waste management(i.e.,good housekeeping practices). The SWPPP shall identify construction BMPs necessary to mitigate project impacts, including but not limited to,any construction BMPs which are as follows: EROSION CONTROLS EC-1 Scheduling EC-8 Wood Mulching EC-2 Preservation of Existing Vegetation EC-9 Earth Dikes and Swales EC-3 Hydraulic Mulch EC-10 Velocity Dissipation Devices EC-4 Hydroseeding EC-11 Slope Drains EC-5 Soil Binders EC-12 Streambank Stabilization EC-6 Straw Mulch EC-13 Polyacrylamide EC-7 Geotextiles and Mats The Planning Center Riverlake Villas Initial StudylMND Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 3-3 •July 2005 City of Lake Elsinore 3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements Table 3.1-1 Responsible for Timing Mitigation Measure Monitoring Completion SEDIMENT CONTROLS SE-1 Silt Fence SE-7 Street Sweeping SE-2 Desilting Basin SE-8 Sandbag Barrier SE-3 Sediment Trap SE-9 Straw Bale Barrier SE-4 Check Dam SE-10 Storm Drain Inlet Protection SE-5 Fiber Rolls SE-11 Chemical Treatment SE-6 Gravel Bag Berm WIND EROSION CONTROLS WE-1 Wind Erosion Control TRACKING CONTROLS TC-1 Stabilized Construction Entrance/Exit TC-2 Stabilized Construction Roadway TC-3 Entrance/Outlet Tire Wash NON-STORM WATER MANAGEMENT CONTROLS NS-1 Water Conservation Practices NS-9 Vehicle&Equipment Fueling NS-2 Dewatering Operations NS-10 Vehicle&Equipment Maintenance NS-3 Paving and Grinding Operations NS-11 Pile Driving Operations NS-4 Temporary Stream Crossing NS-12 Concrete Curing NS-5 Clear Water Diversion NS-13 Concrete Finishing NS-6 Illicit Connection/Discharge NS-14 Material Use Over Water DETECTION AND REPORTING NS-7 Potable Water/Irrigation NS-15 Demolition Over Water NS-8 Vehicle&Equipment Cleaning NS-16 Temporary Batch Plants WASTE MANAGEMENT AND MATERIALS WM-1 Material Delivery&Storage WM-6 Hazardous Waste WM-2 Material Use WM-7 Contaminated Soil WM-3 Stockpile Management WM-8 Concrete Waste WM-4 Spill Prevention and Control WM-9 Sanitary/Septic Waste WM-5 Solid Waste Management Moreover,the following text provides narrative examples of activities related to common activities to maintain construction BMPs. • Sediment from areas disturbed by construction shall be retained on site using structural controls (erosion and sediment controls)and sediment debris basins(first flush basin will serve this function during construction activities)to the maximum extent practicable. The Planning Center Riverlake.Villas.Initial StudylMND Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 3-4 •July 2005 City of Lake Elsinore 3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements Table 3.1-1 Responsible for Timing Mitigation Measure Monitoring Completion Streets adjacent to the site entrance and exits shall be free of sediment and debris from the project site and shall be swept as directed by the City. • Stockpiles of soil shall be properly contained to minimize sediment transport from the site to streets,drainage facilities or adjacent properties via runoff,vehicle tracking,wind,or water. • Appropriate BMPs for construction-related materials,wastes,and spills shall be implemented to minimize transport from the site to streets,drainage facilities,or adjoining properties by wind or runoff. • Runoff from equipment and vehicle washing shall be contained at construction sites unless treated to reduce or remove sediment and other pollutants. • All construction contractor and subcontractor personnel are to be made aware of the required best management practices and good housekeeping measures for the project site and any associated construction staging areas. • At the end of each day of construction activity all construction debris and waste materials shall be collected and properly disposed in trash or recycle bins. • Construction sites shall be maintained in such a condition that an anticipated storm does not carry wastes or pollutants off the site. Discharges of material other than storm water can occur only when necessary for performance and completion of construction practices and where they do not cause or contribute to a violation of any water quality standard;cause or threaten to cause pollution, contamination,or nuisance;or contain a hazardous substance in a quantity reportable under federal regulations 40 CFR parts 117 and 302. • Potential pollutants include but are not limited to:solid or liquid chemical spills;wastes from paints,stains,sealants,glues, limes, pesticides, herbicides,wood preservatives and solvents;asbestos fibers, paint flakes or stucco fragments;fuels,oils, lubricants, and hydraulic,radiator or battery fluids;fertilizers,vehicle/equipment wash water and concrete wash water;concrete,detergent or floatable wastes;wastes from any engine/equipment steam cleaning or chemical degreasing and super-chlorinated potable water line flushing. During construction,the permittee shall dispose of such materials in a specified and controlled temporary area on-site, physically separated from potential storm water runoff,with ultimate disposal in accordance with local, state and federal requirements, • Dewatering of contaminated groundwater,or discharging contaminated soils via surface erosion is prohibited. Dewatering of non- contaminated groundwater requires an NPDES permit from the local Regional Water Quality Control Board. • The permittee and contractor shall inspectthe erosion control work to insure that the work is in accordance with the approved plans. • The permittee shall notify all general contractors,subcontractors, material suppliers, lessees,and property owners:that dumping of chemicals into the storm drain system is prohibited. • Equipment and workers for emergency work shall be made available at all times during the rainy season. Necessary materials shall be available on site and stockpiled at convenient locations to facilitate rapid construction of temporary devices when rain is imminent, The Planning Center Riverlake Villas Initial StudylMND Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 3-5 •July 2005 City of Lake Elsinore 3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements Table 3.1-1 Responsible for Timing Mitigation Measure Monitoring Completion 5.2-2 Prior to issuance of precise grading permits,the applicant shall develop a WQMP in accordance with the requirements of the MSW Permit Community Development and the DAMP and shall submit the WQMP for review to the City. The City shall approve the WQMP prior to the granting of the precise Department/Building Division grading permit for the proposed development. In accordance with the DAMP,the WQMP shall: 1)describe the routine and special post construction BMPs to be used at the proposed development site (including both structural and non structural measures);2) describe responsibility for the initial implementation and long term maintenance of the BMPs;3) provide narrative with the graphic materials as necessary to specify the locations of the structural BMPs;and 4)certify that the project proponent will seek to have the WQMP carried out by all future successors or assigns to the property, The WQMP shall identify source control BMPs to be incorporated into the proposed project including,but not limited to; • Efficient irrigation systems including rain shutoff devices and flow reducers. • Minimization of pesticide and fertilizer application and proper landscape training. • Street sweeping of all impervious streets • Routine maintenance of all catch basin inserts,grate inlets,etc.for debris and litter removal. • Storm drain stenciling or signage on all catch basins with highly visible source control messages. • Educational materials related to urban runoff for field HOA employees distributed on an annual basis. • Education and training of all applicable maintenance/landscaping HOA staff to identify and incorporate BMPs into routine maintenance practices on annual basis • Litter control for the entire project area,as performed by the maintenance crew • BMP maintenance schedules including maintenance requirements of all treatment control BMPs (i.e.,first flush basin and catch basin inserts)as prescribed in the Final Project WQMP. ! iP r, rih •sin i!ls.. Y {6 3k F Ii_� sss> :t . . ,, ,, ,i Ii[f'{{#•rn •i V•�(.,,.,€ .,{1.. (' 11 t i t i}1li ! I 1V;le,�,€ it..t,�r, 'z� r.=,.fl.ss,z{:�.P•r�Erl�:lC�({j tip{.g jy 1 £.}}} 2! ,,i t s .c;. , s. W _ Ir(�; �, #t"{. #1"TI`1 •..r!,- oi .1:F., ��s,t4- i. �! 5.4-1 Prior to issuance of grading permits,the applicant shall incorporate the requirements of the Noise Ordinance as a note on the grading plan Community Development cover sheet,for review and approval by the Director of Community Development. Construction related activities are limited to the hours of Department/Building Division 7:00 a.m.to 7:00 p.m.on Monday through Friday,and prohibits work on Sundays and holidays, unless prior approval is received from the City of Lake Elsinore. In addition,the Noise Ordinance requirements shall be discussed at the pre-grade meeting,and implemented during construction. The Planning Center Riverlake Villas Initial StudylMND Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 3-6 *,July 2005 City of Lake Elsinore 3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements Table 3.1-1 Responsible for Timing Mitigation Measure Monitoring Completion 5.4-2 Prior to issuance of each grading permit,the applicant shall incorporate the following measures as a note on the grading plan cover sheet to Public Works ensure that the greatest distance between noise sources and sensitive receptors during construction activities has been achieved. Department/Engineering a) Construction equipment,fixed or mobile,shall be maintained in proper operating condition with approved noise mufflers. Division b) Construction staging areas shall be located away from off-site receptors and occupied buildings on site during the later phases of project development. c) Stationary equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from residential areas to the greatest extent feasible. d) Construction access routes shall be selected to minimize truck traffic near existing residential uses where reasonably feasible. 5.4-3 Prior to grading,an acoustic engineer shall be hired to evaluate and prescribe building specific acoustic measures to ensure that noise levels Community Development would comply with the State's interior noise standard. Department/Building Division ' ' TRRNSp(i! TAl`10N' � ,��€•� ,�{ ,,,,t�; €,,�„ ,�„��;:.�� �3 , „ �, ''„ , � ,, 5.5-1 Prior to issuance of building permits,the project applicant shall re-draw the entrance of the proposed project site to restrict project access to Public Works right turn in/out and left turn in only.As an alternative, project access shall be restricted to right turn in/out only to maintain acceptable LOS Department/Engineering levels. Division 5.5-2 Prior to issuance of building permits,the project applicant shall re-draw the entrance of the proposed project site to allow 100 feet of Public Works distance between the access gate and Riverside Drive to allow for adequate queuing of cars.As an alternative,project access shall be Department/Engineering restricted to right turn in/out only and the access gate will remain where it is proposed. Division The Planning Center Riverlake Villas Initial StudylMND Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 3-7 •July 2005 City of sake Elsinore 3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements This page intentionally left blank. The Planning Center Riverlake Villas Initial StvdylMND Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 3-8 *July 2005 City of Lake Elsinore 4. Mitigation Monitoring Reports Mitigation monitoring reports are required to document compliance with the Mitigation Monitoring Program, and dispute arbitration enforcement resolution. Specific reports include: • Field Check Report .; Plan Check Conformance Reports • Implementation Compliance Report • Arbitration/Enforcement Report 4.1 FIELD REPORTS Field reports are required to record in-field compliance and conditions. 4.2 PLAN CHECK CONFORMANCE REPORTS ' Plan check conformance reports are completed by the Community Development Department, the Department of Public Works and the mitigation monitor to evaluate final engineering compliance with mitigation measures outlined in the Final EIR. 4.3 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLIANCE REPORT(ICR) 4 The ICR is prepared to document the implementation of mitigation measures on a phased basis and is shown in Table 3.1-1. The report summarizes implementation compliance including mitigation measures, a;. date completed, and monitor's signature. 4.4 ARBITRATION/ENFORCEMENT REPORT(AER) The AER is prepared to document the outcome of arbitration committee review, and becomes a portion of the implementation compliance report. 6.. x . 4: Riverlake Villas Initial StudylMND City of Lake Elsinore •Page 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring Program 4. Mitigation Monitoring Reports This page intentionally left blank. Page 4-2 •The Planning Center July 2005 5. Community Involvement 5.1 COMMUNITY COORDINATION Monitoring reports are public documents, and available for review by the general public. Discrepancies in monitoring reports can be taken to the arbitration committee by the general public. Se., 4- s t 2 �A Riverlake Villas Initial SttsdylMND City of Lake Elsinore •Page 5-1 i . Mitigation Monitoring Program 5. Community Involvement This page intentionally left blank. Page 5-2 •The Planning Center July 2005 THE PLANNING CENTER �Ci Q i INITIAL STUDYJMND NO. 2005-04 FOR: RIVERL4KE VILLAS TENTATIVE PARCEL NO.32674 SCH#2005061138 k 00 prepared for: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Contact:Linda Miller, Associate Planner prepared by: THE PLANNING CENTER Contact: William Halligan, Esq. Director of Environmental Services JULY 18, 2005 INITIAL STUDYIMND NO. 2005-04 FOR: RIVERLAKE VILLAS TENTATIVE PARCEL NO. 32674' SCH#2005061138 prepared far: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 South Main Street Contact. Linda Miller, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Associate Planner (909)674-3124 ext. 209 prepared by: THE PLANNING CENTER 1580 Metro Drive Contact, William Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Halligan, Esq. Phone: 714.966.9220 Director of Environmental Services COL-04.OE JULY 18, 2005 ------------- ` ^ ! . . ~�'^,�` Table of v�vYJtentJ Section Page ` ' ' ' ' F / � 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................1 11 PROJECT LOCATION.............................................---------------------.1 1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL 1 . --------------------------------. ' 1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION....................................................................................................... � 14 EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN............................................................................. 1.5 D Approvals ----------------------------.------7 ' . 2. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST..................................................................................11 ' ^ � 2.1 BACKGROUND---------------------------------------11 2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ..................................................13 � 2.3 DETERMINATION: (To Be Completed Bv The Lead Agency) ............................................18 �.4 E\��-UAT(]N (]FENV|8ONK8ENT7�L|WYPACl�� 14 ---------------------- � ���U����&���������&����U|� ^ ' --------..,..~'..-----------.-.~....,..------------23 3.1 AESTHETICS........................................................................................................................23 8.2 AGRICULTURE RESOURCES................. ........... ------------------ . 27 ' l ' --' 3� AIR QUALITY � 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES --------------------------------.3G 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES.......................... ..........................................................................37 8/6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS..................................................................... ...................................O8 / 37 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS..................................................... ...................41 . | 8.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY...................................................................................42 'OP 3.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING................................................................ ................. ..............48 3.10 MINERAL RESOURCES ----------------------------------.40 COO ' 3.11 NOISE-------------.. . 49 i � -----------------------------� � 3.12 POPULATION AND HOUSING .............................................................................................5O 3.18 PUBLIC SERVICES.............................................................................................................. 57 3.14 RECREATION.............................................................................. ........................................5B 3.15 TRANS PO RC--------------------~----------.GQ 3.18 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS......................................................................... ..........81 '. 317 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE......................................................................04 4. PERSONS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONSULTED AND REFERENCES.....................65 � = 4.1 preparers ........................................................................................................... .................G5 4.2 Persons and organizations consulted..................................................................................05 4.3 references..................................................................................................................... .......6G � � APPENDICES } � � A. Urban Crossroads Traffic Study Qune. 2005 B. Air Quality Study ` C. Noise Analysis | D. Correspondence { � . ! ^ Roexlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elr6mrew Page i � mw��o=*^it»dyw�&A.Vil**^*S�°^+*Ad� ______ Table of Contents List of Figures Figure Page Figure1 Local Vicinity Map................................................................................................................... Figure2 Aerial Photograph.........................................................................................................................5 Figure3 Site Plan........................................................................................................................................9 Figure4 Scenic Vistas ..............................................................................................................................25 List of Tables Table Page Table 1 Ambient Air Quality Standards for Criteria Pollutants................................................................30 Table 2 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Summary..................................................................................31 Table 3 SCAQMD Threshold Of Significance .........................................................................................32 Table 4 Daily Construction Emissions.....................................................................................................34 Table 5 Daily Operational Emissions......................................................................................................34 Table 6 City of Lake Elsinore Exterior Noise Standards (Ldn) Levels Not To Exceed More Than 30 MinutesIn Any Hour...................................................................................................................51 Table 7 Traffic Noise Along Riverside Drive (dBA CNEL) .......................................................................53 Table 8 Interior Noise Levels (dBA CNEL) ..............................................................................................54 Table 9 Vibration Levels from Project Construction Activities.................................................................54 Table 10 Noise Levels at Project Construction Sites (dBA Leq)...............................................................55 Table 11 Project-Generated Traffic ...........................................................................................................60 Page ii •The Planning Center July, 2005 P;lCOLO¢.OEllnitiel St„dyiRi,<,date Villa,fnirialSard)r_j'n JrJK ' r _ 1. Introduction 1. INTRODUCTION Riverlake Villas, LLP(Applicant) proposes to develop Riverlake Villas,Tentative Parcel Map No. 32674 for Condominiums(TPM 32674), a 51-unit single-family townhouse residential community on 4.95 acres in the City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside, California.The proposed project site is zoned R-3, T ` Medium/High Residential. As such,this Initial Study will examine all elements at a buildout capacity for s the proposed project site, 18 dwelling units per acre, or 89 units. Following preliminary review of the proposed project, The City of Lake Elsinore, as the Lead Agency, has determined that the proposed development project is subject to the guidelines and regulations of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This Initial Study has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), as amended, to determine if approval of the discretionary actions requested and subsequent development would have a significant impact on the environment. :. The purposes of this Initial Study, as described in the CEQA Guidelines, Section 15063, are to (1) Provide the lead agency with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or Negative Declaration; (2) Enable the lead agency to modify a negative declaration; and (3) Assist in the preparation of an EIR, if one is required. ..., 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION Y The proposed project site encompasses approximately 4.95 acres in the City of Lake Elsinore. The site is located north of Riverside Drive (State Route 74), between Grand Avenue and Lincoln Street, ' approximately one-third of a mile from the northern shore of Lake Elsinore. The Leach Canyon Flood Control Channel is located directly adjacent to the eastern border of the proposed project site. Figures 1 and 2, Local Vicinity Map and Aerial Photograph, illustrate the location of the project site in its local context. ' 1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 1.2.1 Existing Land Use The proposed project site is rectangular-shaped and covers approximately 4.95 acres.The site was formerly used as a spa and resort facility, the Lake Shore Health Resort; however, the previous structures have been demolished, currently leaving only foundations on the site. F 1.2.2 Surrounding Land Use - The general vicinity of the project site is characterized by single- and multi-family residential properties directly to the north and west. The Leach Canyon Flood Control Channel forms the eastern border of the property, with residential uses located to the east of the channel. Riverside Drive (SR 74) forms the . . southern boundary of the site, with Lake Elsinore located approximately one-third mile to the south. Located directly across from the proposed project site, on the south side of Riverside Drive, is The Outhouse Bar, with a small general store attached. There is also a small group of mobile homes next to the bar and store (see Figure 2, Aerial Photograph) i F. w Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •Page I �, P:1COL-04.OFylnitiel Strcdj lRBslake Vida Initial Study fir ldo 1. Introduction This page intentionally left blank Page 2 •The Planning Center July,2005 P:ICOL-09.OEllnitial Snrd7q((ian4a.€s Villar Iniva!S7udy-final der 1. Introduction Local Vicinity J.;.i , l ---- - r..r. . ...._ .- .... I. .t .-,-. .—, rid._. .__- -- ~�\ /f '''.i't f - •�\. \f'C/%i., -:�tk i ` ' / ��.�.p/ /' '` + �', r ` = y?� \�/ '(�% 'l: t<X .� �,>; r� l r./; .�?fix i ";•z\�J\�\ �J ,,,/ �,j��.\ �. r ``S�C,1-l`�''✓Il !,r - c__ .,�:-r 'Yi ? / i \ •C >.' %/ ,\. ; . \ \ �• ��»' !'C r- ! /•1r� �1-�i,,.�,�.. __ . ! �__ i �l:-•C/,,/ j, \ �,"�C1` �.t.�1..f• n/-f �:,�i t• J / i'.�y �2'\`r '�1 -1 ` I..v LI I I I�' \ r !A/ 1- c• Lr:•r` '�I / �� L -1v�/�i �< C �I \�it. 1,- /f /` �� vSCi.✓` ✓/s ✓ '� �� ✓T �i,`> C, > y �^ \/ ,\<\ \\ yJ 1y�',!'- . 3f Y ,L,J'- ;c;�r ,�'_,i_(1 1 �r_:7�� }� jY.' C CF \ y� Y`�, r ,_.: ,�{,i;�;/%!'\ \ 1 ,/ �i .'� \\y\w \ \i`/�.•• \ / X'e \. - :i�_-_ _ r r,•`��.>�.1'\ �✓�L�� _ �r,1 y' ,�Y��;,:�aKl f i I `„ T���•Li•. J.r\,_)./ � a. ', / / \, y/'?'.,/_\\ ♦ \ �� ` / \}1 t _ �,r�:I J*�k�Y. v.L_�l3Sy�y�- / W ice/��. '\ y-:1. ;� r \'` ,s/' jC/'• \ ! ` �\,! I Cam..�' r I _ i -I J� r I � �' j// �•t .r+ r�. �?./ //tt� S• `: \ \'`�`., � til/," yf\ - °ns!• 5tf. .Ni SCS, r ram. !J/iC _ + ,�-t,��-s••'-`. ib .n r<;,C.?; /\ `, /. \ '� \O M,T.f�'\� 7 �• tiyr v.•�4L rl ry ' �� i•., '�•I r ri y ..ti s,!"T' a+'r..+'� >._ 'S,1 ,.! �`.., �j?'���! �ii, /r; - `�f/r, 1 "' < ,�- 1 ��..L?y �..a y`a'C`I� ♦ '� 4j�'e \� ✓ i�Z_ ��-.h r I E- -t.=" ;li% �'•�0�\ >:% !�� ('�d�, � `!U" !i�';�o�.(�'•/ r�'1:I��- '�-" , �''v-tr' ,�. �` •`� ♦ \ .+r,./i . C\\ \ �\/� �-4� �(` > > " vt,.F" n n-a'�, rs1w:-,y. �,\ \\, �I'• � \ f� 1. ,.,. /, �J�'t��j7•�Vi .� 1r; r 1 -�_ ' -;!_.! .—h\ ! � •�.J ri � 'j+` � ., � ��i<��a�;,.�.:� �}u��"`Fs�'"� s\` ��\ \,`,\\ ! \t/f r" !`�•�� �i, ��f' \ 1 i tF { 7 i-_Si T�J�\V \� �`� Tr� `\ !' �..' ! ' ,l'° yfq r � r''ps\��P,Cu�`a�."V� LJ�'Tl>'•�/i\/ f, \ \` \�!% \ ��..% �l .>\ tip/ ���/Jff// Trl �Y'-j i '.�, �/{ %!`V 5. . n,�,(''r, y / \t i`' �v- '''" � �\ ,2 , �)��!'� �Fyr •.J _. -i7]_--I mo1 t,!i��„7[�T.1I1r'i•�•1 1 1�r�'/`�>4�1^}i k��T I r-J�_ t- �_I-i rfi r,.fJi."".;i�._IT";/i 4, � /`c. ! ,!v/!''•%,i(✓p+,✓, ./•\x'+j✓yam, ."Cr;Jf % ''�i 'JS\'?0l ✓//,//`fY'�,;��/r��•�,`✓ea"a-r��l.'3.4���/,l'11lY�.,�t-�IN/,S�_i '1, u{�:�!I,, r�i.,,/r,r 1,1•t-+��`�!(j_�r'Ii. /:�/�i g inj� /•./\ \•.`',\•'�i,\�Al \.�^,•P.3�.\ �'''!�`1\�.. -Jy/��` 1 \L.?f�?/W �\ \-_~ `C r?! Y:I!\�`* Y \vl �:y.r �•`� L`'''r jr'"'a'�T, � , \ ,(���; \ C���IF;: ,p��G�\ )\�' '°,i `\'d.•/�y'%'`��/�: \-,.-- _� f 1 !� !' f '7�. ;j7� f , \`•,/` \ \( \ /� •. Z �"L f 7-_r 1 f~ 1�1�>, 1: \ IFS �r 1 rr` ti,;ni1�.,¢]h' _ a3< 1•. \ ;/Y. >^ 1 �I F�'r'j.J�,�. ;�yr /.? it " \ \�1i •Y\7� ~ ' !`'�i ''l� �a`�%: •F y414'4^+'Ij�+�,.,, �!., ,\, Zip �A: \ -•� ' .Li:wL:.; ' J �_17_:_f I' / r �, •' I / i. �>Y ,�:. /J/ �'"•t]r r�' ' •'- 'c ,{ �_1 \ , \ '�4�j �l �i�`Cj ". \l .r. �t', •\ i , f/'. ✓�,�rlr';.:-`}f�.•',Tll� - S;h',ri Ir'�j'r ,•.!- "/1-� �'\ \• �. 'r�-\. VJ'•'COJ � \ I /f �':/��. .;u ��1� / fill t•! ^1���`J •/�` I ���iLC Li;�.. (�i �^J.:-i i_ -���,` '',�'r' ;�c� / � a'' �CvJ'• � \ '`., � �// /,'%!'lii�/���'/���~'�� ''�i' � T �� ♦` " •'�3! Td�k-_"C !° __II !''---� i�`—�� ')''� `. _ >z �ti•r4 � �'\_: `\ � l l//"���'/// ,/<i�/' ��U%rv� �,�. M -r-(-• _1_'.j r�'1'ai% 71 �•;`�1- l }i '!,- }�—� 1� �k�J !♦T7V; \L�. 'D� �\ .� // \� JCJL" l __ ` fIA&ZZ --b mi �fj oz�y=;1 �l ba,���rrr�fry .• - r ,/ \\`\�` ) �\ /Rf. r%/ ,T% /•!. '•��\`� % Lake . :-_- i !V .h\ / :�`.' i/ \ �� '\,` /Ii'•."2 \,Y�",i.Y•� v P. Ytj ln✓r, i ! ! /%///! i fl r �I' V/! �.s \fr I � i� :! //.�. t,!�/ `f,/,; �,•�%.''%i/l,��i' /!Yf _ ��/%���)/!1/!r �dhr"T � ?NOF �% ;-- _ River" K&Initial Study The Planning Center Figure 1 l/ l • - {� 'i� / 'h f �P y�yy •4j /�A '�r � � � f t � '� ``�; R :. � r � , v fir` ,6"� 'sj`"�,r�`9�k�k t�" ,✓L k. 5 fir, 3 J'l�..}� z -�( ., kA c :'F t h/c ., +"� y _,.�,r'{� �r ��}� '�: s�vf yw.,,.✓e v• �'" S { is v. s ' ,���,��� � �,: w s ✓ t'::w��ee..✓ iT � A-0.p� �A i �� L �A''x l 1 A.S �' ,5 s �. �p �`•` *,w ''t ,�, ,yl buy "} 1a ✓' t < r s x. » .0 7r F y A _. { • �,s �� � � � ��' ��j � .. k; 4..' �`, .fix",!' _e f ,,�_. p1 "d✓ Jam', s Vne tz 2 e � J 1 . Introduction This page intentionally left blank Page 6 •The Planning Center June,2005 P:ICOI.-04AE}lxuirl SmAyfRi�rrlake VAu Iniilal S1ydp-/i-4d 1. Introduction 1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1.3.1 Proposed Land Use The proposed project involves the development of a 51-unit, single-family townhouse community. The proposed project will include open spaces, a clubhouse, community barbecue areas, and tot lots. Project homes would be comprised of two-story, detached units, ranging in size from 1,291 to 1,522 6 square feet. The layout of the project is illustrated in Figure 3, Site Plan. Entry into the project site would utilize an existing entryway provided off of Riverside Drive (SR 74), which is designated as an Urban Arterial Highway. An encroachment permit would be required from Caltrans to obtain clearance for construction of these lanes. Emergency access to the site would be accomplished via a gated, locked entryway west of the primary site access. Additionally, any work performed within the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District(RCFCD) Right of Way or the Leach Canyon Flood Control Channel, along the eastern boundary of the site, would be done after obtaining an encroachment permit from the RCFCD. 1.3.2 Project Phasing The proposed project will be completed in one phase. Construction is estimated to be completed within 17-20 months. 1.4 EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN The City of Lake Elsinore General Plan guides development of all land within City limits. The Land Use j Element of the General Plan designates the site as General Commercial (GC); however, a General Plan �" Amendment is being requested to change the designation on the site to Medium/High Density �� Residential to accommodate the project and provide consistency with the existing zoning designation for the site.The proposed General Plan designation would allow for up to 89 attached residential units. The site is currently zoned Medium/High Density Residential (R-3). 1.5 DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS Approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 32674. .` Approval of IS/MND 2005-04 Approval of General Plan Amendment 2004-10 Approval of Conditional Use Permit 2004-27 Approval of Residential Project 2004-11 Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •Page 7 Y:ICOL-04 OEIfniic<StralylRrtxrla,ke Vii(Initi.1Srxdy-fr'n 4'(x 1. Introduction This page intentionally left blank. Page 8 The Planning Center July,2005 P.-�COf 04.OAuuirial Si.IXI8i—I.k.VA.,[ndid SwdJ/'..U. 1. Introduction Site Plan W a r FfN aarsr.r IwN raec Wut, auFaic.ac — Y�� „OU 12 n t° o a 7 } e s a a 2 oaarr�u II ( .iLL51PG710A(A-f 16 i 5 roo s8 w 3 5 59' J -- pnaAt 21 20 10 1Q 17is M1 tS i tg mna• rt incc� .. a.ar mu mu mar I PACK UAL r� aow. s w 'ma I 'y aarr. xs yKxa GOWN.tr A A 8 A A g A ki/EN RO011 aaa.raot re I " REVA710M " f oa.aa rM R PATIO sir \C 12 uNr Sam MACHADO ST al A r '�.«'TYP! Ta+Ta�Y mu A ( S�Grlf�h'G G ¢ o^1 JOB 23 rr 1 Tt m__ ,� a.,,C �e i8 I z SITE z 20 2fawN0 �f4 R4 cam". N a � R Vr.R5 - R A Amu . 44 j aoFFar.•Lmm ra. r1w 21 26 sm 40.�+. r' A 9.Awo I f WA aoR.y OD It F ( ,��.�.� , ., Mwi IA LIKE 22 �:' p R' mA,.l `�... —__ slid" �t.sintoseE Or C 6 �ww�r C�Lt6 4 4 (`T' !' 23 a 28 `A�. r apaa 10! m"°" 5 7OND-JJ �� —� [[ �� 9 �+� ( eanexnu xx w w YiG81IFY MAP 3 )h%G:1'Jf..C.FYr.Y.TCO ALY�h7.Y 24 q �IQ� s' Kid+ `,/. ( (� c` A I 2s z A> „ as a6Q� 26 C A 27 A U. 47 ma a 8 6 mai --- A ~0 A a.aa 26'�a� d 8d or A _ a g i ur c nc c cre flia I rllyry G,G�G 29 frabt p7Y A6 a1t�N i"..s"'.r A maaIF '�:x`-CAW'c xsavra tmtiAV x- pr urrrzAw&� ao 30Aerie 04` ,w ri'P�S�r/5N , F mir A EA A- C rw� t e e 31 :si E a Cl s 4 PWATE STM ET 44 LOT N orb p".Tyr _ R4'E+BAQ�ICCAOC!'B9 a�w��v+�na t f{ T07 w"T!xmox EpK !awF ar�s��wrawa '"""-ree<<'.iu~ I OODICATdI EAeIaeDR ` W«! C u • rirn �„x xscvwU try a* rn�rl r rrro � �aCr[P.^.�'MG.av9lY.• Kf 1i: "--'1N9� b A•.f1S'.0 FbYGAP�.ir` Al7..V I' x7'J,� rw i? F xc�acke NOT TO SCALE Riverlake Villa Initial Study The Planning Center Figure 3 1. Introduction This page intentionally left blank k;Rrt v i tS ei 1 e S S _ S •y t S Page 10 •The Planning Center , June,2005 P�4COL-04.oEtrRnict Sa dplRiarb4 Viltoc fo�+:rtSrwll-frald« 2. Environmental Checklist 2. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2.1 BACKGROUND 1. Project Title: Riverlake Villas-Tentative Parcel Map No. 32674 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Linda Miller, Associate Planner (951) 674-3124 ext. 209 4. Project Location: The project site encompasses APN 379/315-033 (4.95 acres). The project site is located on Riverside Drive (SR 74), between Grand Avenue and Lincoln Street in the City of Lake Elsinore.The project site is approximately one-third mile from the northwestern shore of Lake Elsinore. 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Riverlake Villas Partners, LLP 4995 Murphy Canyon Road %JT410 Suite 402 San Diego, CA 92123 6. General Plan Designation: General Commercial 7. Zoning: R-3-Medium/High Density Residential 8. Description of Project (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to, later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary): The proposed project consists of the development of 51 single-family detached townhouses. Project homes would be two-story units, ranging in size from 1,291 to 1,552 square feet. Figure 3 , Site Plan, shows the configuration of lots on the project site. Entry into the project site would be provided from an existing entryway off of Riverside Drive (SR 74). A deceleration lane and an acceleration lane would be constructed at the entrance to allow for uninterrupted traffic flow on Riverside Drive. An encroachment permit would be required from Caltrans to obtain clearance for construction of these lanes. Emergency access to the site would be accomplished via a gated, locked entryway west of the primary site access. Additionally, any work performed within the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCD) Right of Way or the Leach Canyon Flood Control Channel, along the eastern boundary of the site, would be done after obtaining an encroachment permit from the RCFCD. Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •Page 11 Vd111 Mai ISI.dy-fi.,Ux 2. Environmental Checklist 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting (Briefly describe the project's surroundings): The proposed project site is bounded by residential uses to the east, west and north, and by the Leach Canyon Flood Control Channel to the immediate east, and Riverside Drive (SR 74)to the south. Lake Elsinore is approximately one-third mile to the south. 10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required (e.g., permits,financing approval, or participation agreement): City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 32674 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Encroachment Permit County of Riverside Fire Department Fire Access and Safety Standards (Emergency access, exit routes, adequate fire hydrant flow) Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Encroachment Permit, Municipal Stormwater Permit, Best Management Practices(BMPs) Page 12 •The Planning Center July, 2005 p:}COL-Oq.OL•Ilrs."tiel Studj lRnerL.F.Vill.,lnieiel Srndy-fi—tda 2. Environmental Checklist 2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agricultural Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/Solis ❑ Hazards&Hazardous Materials ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance 2.3 DETERMINATION: (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE LEAD AGENCY) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. UWE find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or"potentially 00 significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Date Linda Miller Associate Planner Printed name Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Luke Elsinore •Page 13 Pa COI.04.OL•Ilnidel Smdj lRico lckr Vd ,1niria/S-dy-f-1 dr.: 2. Environmental Checklist 2.4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except"No Impact' answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A"No Impact'answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g.,the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact'answer should be explained where it is based on project- specific factors, as well as general standards (e.g.,the project would not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less Than Significant Impact". The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses", may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated", describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. Page 14 •The Planning Center July, 2005 A:IC01.o4.OE}L, ISud)tiRAA,vtu„Wli.ISI IJ;fLd,< 2. Environmental Checklist 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any used to evaluate each question; and r-1 b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. a : r...w y I Z Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore Page 15 P:1COL-O4.OE}lnitiul Study}Aforrleke Vill--Initwl Study f,-Zd. 2. Environmental Checklist Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b) Substantially damage scenic resources,including,but not limited to,trees,rock outcroppings,and historic buildings X within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality X of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which X would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? e� X-Helneer`imp�cju-o- nvrce are t t>lica» ; '19 ei? _._ t �i seiau4 t1ril irss g pac`ts�n ..s- Fi�ttnental•etfec o�Cre ltorrua°A rye t ��.-�`n�l�uafua ror�-and�►tS���� _ �{ .�.�_ a) Convert Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance(Farmland),as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring X Program of the California Resources Agency,to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,or a X Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature,could result in conversion of X Farmland,to non-agricultural use? p ttgl�nn conf�sff ilAntaankece.thceiterra o� nb d my eab(�sh�bY6 all le a{r qualtttl manageenffflr air a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable X air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to X an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air X quality standard(including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X concent(ations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number X of people? RESdUENoteec�l ....' a) Have a substantial adverse effect,either directly or through habitat modifications,on any species identified as a candidate,sensitive,or special status species in local or X regional plans, policies,or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? Page 16 •The Planning Center July, 2005 P:lCOL-04.OE11mitial S+dy{R& 4afe FX-1nilz ISKdp fi.Ad� 2. Environmental Checklist Less Than Significant :. Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or 3 other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,policies,regulations or by the California X Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including,but not limited to,marsh,vernal pool,coastal, X etc.)through direct removal,filling,hydrological interruption,or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with X established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nurnry sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources,such as a tree preservation policy or X ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,Natural Community Conservation Plan, X or other approved local,regional,or state habitat conservation plan? a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a AM historical resource as defined in§15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X an archaeological resource pursuant to§15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological _ X resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains,including those interred X outside of formal cemeteries? 7 w a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,including the risk of loss,injury,or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault,as delineated on the most recent Alquist-POolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map,issued by the State Geologist for the area or X based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X ifi) Seismic-related ground failure,including liquefaction? X iv) Landslides? X b Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,or that would become unstable as a result of the project,and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide,lateral X spreading,subsidence,liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil,as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code(1994),creating substantial risks X to life or property? Riverlake Villas.Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore *Page 17 P:}COL-04.OF,V> in1 S dj'Wiea&&V Ul hir.1 Study--frne[,dx 2, Environmental Checklist Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems X where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? TAI Mr a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport,use,or disposal of hazardous X materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident X conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,substances,or waste within one- X quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code X Section 65962.5 and,as a result,would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project X result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or X working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency X evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires,including where X wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? V1HYtYUlm liiA� � �� � p:af✓ __ .._ w v _ a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level(e.g.,the production rate of X pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration of the course of a X stream or river,in a manner which would result in a substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site Page 18 a The Planning Center July, 2005 PaCOL-04.OE4I.iaictSudj Vitl¢ fn ai¢l Suds-fin l.drc 2. Environmental Checklist Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Substantially after the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,or substantially increase the rate or amount X of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage X systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood X ` Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding,including flooding as a X result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche,tsunami,or mudflow? X k) Potentially impact stormwater runoff from construction X activities? 1) Potentially impact stormwater runoff from post- X _ construction activities? m) Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater pollutants CON from areas of material storage,vehicle or equipment fueling,vehicle or equipment maintenance(including s. washing),waste handling,hazardous materials handling or X storage,delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas? n) Result in the potential for discharge of stormwater to affect X ;. the beneficial uses of the receiving waters? o) Create the potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause X environmental harm? p) Create significant increases in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas? X a) Physically divide an established community? X b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan,policy,or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including,but not limited to the general plan,specific plan, X local coastal program,or zoning ordinance)adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or X natural community conservation plan? a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a value to the region and the X residents of the state? Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •Page 19 P:COL-04.OEVxwd Srudj�W-1,&VATI NirilI Srxdy-firsAd. I i. - 2. Environmental Checklist Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general X plan,specific plan or other land use plan? _�. 0015 a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or X noise ordinance,or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive X groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the X project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing X without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project X expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the project expose people residing or working in the project X area to excessive noise levels? 10 Pn. XT11, a) Induce substantial population growth in an area,either directly(for example,by proposing new homes and X businesses)or indirectly(for example,through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing X elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people,necessitating the X construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ����� `��"�-��� ��Vitould#hc��ro�ebeti�.�ub�jarnti�+�rse�hysu:atrmpacts asstieiated vrrth the provision ��he�;�`hysic�lalyaltelgouernmental�ac�htr�s;-ne de`fa�w�ysrcaEly�"ttere�governmentaE�-aciht�es,_the x ---fin#ion of��tch�ear�ItL�aitse�r nittean��nr►�ro� s,�r€ortCer to ma�nta�rt acceptable,serviee ratios ,_: _ �res �xtnes,pr,other performance ntijeci,�ut±s#orsezviccs = -- - _ a Fire protection? X b) Police protection? X c Schools? X d) Parks? X e Other public facilities? X a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that X substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Page 20 •The Planning Center July, 2005 P.ICOL-04.OEVIniiiaiS7xdplRi--Li,Villasl 6.1 Swdj fi—fahr 2. Environmental Checklist Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which X might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? • vw _ V� �Rfi111C C gti � a _ � w a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e.,result in a substantial increase in either the number of X vehicle trips,the volume to capacity ratio on roads,or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed,either individually or cumulatively,a level of service standard established by the county congestion X s management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an ,. increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results X in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or incompatible X uses (e.g.,farm equipment)? e Result in inadequate emergency access? X f Result in inadequate parking capacity? X g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans,or programs supporting alternative transportation(e.g.,bus turnouts, X bicycle racks)? a) Exceed waste water treatment requirements of the u applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b) Require or result in the construction of new water or waste ,. water treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, X the construction of which could cause significant ... environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water �:- drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the X construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources or are new or X expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the waste water treatment provider,which serves or may serve the project that it has X adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to X accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal,state,and local statutes and X - regulations related to solid waste? Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •Page 21 P:ICOL-0¢.OEIlRitial Stadl}Rfon lcke Vi!!c_,1nai.LS ad}-firwl da 2. Environmental Checklist Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or X animal community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a X project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects,and the effects of probable future projects.) _ c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,either X directly or indirectly? Page 22 •The Planning Center July, 2005 PrICOL-04.OFllnitialStadylki—I.Ar Villas lnitial&t dr fmaldrc 3. Environmental Analysis 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Section 2.4 provided a checklist of environmental impacts. This section provides an evaluation of the impact categories and questions contained in the checklist and identifies mitigation measures, if applicable. 3.1 AESTHETICS a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Less Than Significant Impact. Scenic vistas are generally considered to be located over one mile from a receptor and generally consist of background views. The goal of the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, Community Design Element, is to provide for the preservation of significant views to the lake and the mountains surrounding Lake Elsinore. The proposed project site is situated at an elevation of approximately 1,270 feet above mean sea level (msl), approximately one-third mile from the northwest lake edge. The nearest prominent viewshed would be Lake Elsinore, located directly south of the project site, along with the Santa Ana Mountains, located within the Cleveland National Forest. The Santa Ana = Mountains are located to the west of the project site.These viewsheds are depicted in Figure 4, Scenic Vistas. Immediately surrounding the project site to the west and north are single-family and multi-family dwellings. To the immediate east of the site is the Leach Canyon Flood Control Channel, separating the site from additional residential dwellings located further to the east, and to the south is Riverside Drive (SR 74). The proposed project would entail the construction of two-story residential units. The residences abutting the project to the west and north are considered sensitive receptors. Development of the proposed project would alter these sensitive receptors' existing views of the Santa Ana Mountain Range and the fake. However, many of these residential views are already compromised by block walls that (� surround the project site from a prior development, including a number of large dense trees that are currently on-site, and had views compromised by that earlier development. Therefore, the proposed project would not obstruct any backdrop/skyline views of sensitive receptors or impair scenic vistas to a greater degree than already exists. No mitigation measures are necessary. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to,trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. Riverside Drive (SR 74), which forms the southern boundary of the site, is designated as an eligible scenic highway, not an officially designated state scenic highway. Additionally, the site does not contain any heritage trees, rock outcroppings, or physical structures that could be construed as a scenic resource. Therefore, impacts in regards to scenic resources are not expected and no mitigation measures are necessary. c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Less Than Significant Impact. The project site exists as vacant land, characterized with native and non-native vegetation, in addition to foundations and construction materials left from the previous development. The Leach Canyon Flood Control Channel runs along the eastern boundary of the property, from north to south, and separates the project site from adjacent residential uses located to the east of the channel. Existing single-and multi-family residences are located to the west and north of the proposed project site. Project implementation would permanently alter the existing environment with residential uses. Aesthetic impacts are, by their very nature, subjective. While the proposed residential development with its associated new landscaping, street improvements, and sidewalks might be considered appealing by Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •,Page 23 N:}COL-04.OEUrsirial Srudy}RFcr.la.€e Vill,,lnniel Sturlp�na[dz 3. Environmental Analysis This page intentionally left blank. Page 24 •The Planning Center July,2005 y:hcoc-"Ohlr iuvtswd),%Ri-1 k,VA.,I.rniisaar•fn 1A. S 3L'S f'�t3 y �"JP°may, s �.•y/�ilk�W?ja".`wC�,`i�'.L-50 ..��i zR 5 t r � 3. Environmental Analysis This page intentionally left blank. } t Page 26 •The Planning Center June,2005 P.ICOL-04.UFkl iii,151rdylRR-xrfukrVill.,loins!So.1j,f—I.d. .F r 3. Environmental Analysis some people, others could view development of the project site as objectionable. The proposed project would be designed to be compatible with the aesthetics of the existing neighboring residential uses to the west, east, and north. Although the site is currently vacant, debris and litter is scattered throughout the site. The proposed project would improve the visual character of the site by removing this debris. Residences facing Riverside Drive (SR 74) would entail enhanced features to provide a pleasant view from the roadway. Therefore, impacts in this regard would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation incorporated.The proposed project, as developed within the County of Riverside, must adhere to Ordinance No. 665, Regulating Light Pollution, which intends to restrict the permitted use of certain light fixtures emitting undesirable light rays into the night sky which may interfere with astronomical observation and research.' According to the Riverside County General Plan, the proposed project sites resides in Zone B, defined as "the circular ring area defined by two circles, one forty-five (45)miles in radius, centered on Palomar Observatory, and the other the perimeter of Zone A." (Zone A is defined as the circular area fifteen (15) miles in radius centered on the Palomar Observatory.)' Lighting types and purposes are classified and strictly regulated, so as not to allow for light pollution caused by new development. The closest residential units to the proposed site are located along the western and northern perimeter of the site. The implementation of the mitigation measures mentioned below would ensure that any lighting or glare impacts are reduced to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measures mn 1. On-site buildings shall use low reflective glass and building material to keep daytime glare to a minimum. 2. All exterior lights shall be shielded where feasible and focused to minimize spill light into the night sky or adjacent properties. 3. New exterior lighting used for security purposes in the evening would be limited to low- wattage, energy-conserving night lighting. 4. New lights would be situated and arranged so that no direct beam would leave the project site. Luminaries shall be provided with filtering louvers and hoods. During installation, the luminaries shall be aimed and corrected by a field crew to aim the lights away from viewers. 3.2 AGRICULTURE RESOURCES In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. ' http://www.boardofsupervisors.co.riverside.ca.us/ords/600/655.htrn z http://municipalcodes.lexisnexis.com/codes/riversideco/ Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •Page 27 PaCOG-OQ.OE}/xitia!S�xdj�Rieerlake Vi[fir!Wirral Stadl-�rro[.dx 3. Environmental Analysis a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? No Impact.The proposed project site is currently designated as Urban in the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, and is not considered prime or unique farmland. It is not listed on the California Resources Agency Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program as farmland. Therefore,the proposed project would not create a significant impact to farmland resources, and no mitigation measures are necessary. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact.The proposed project site is not zoned for agricultural use; therefore, it is not subject to a Williamson Act contract. No mitigation measures are necessary. c) Involve other changes in the existing.environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland,to non-agricultural use? No Impact.The proposed project site is not zoned for agricultural use, or designated as Farmland. Therefore, no conversion would be involved and no mitigation measures are necessary. 3.3 AIR QUALITY The Air Quality section addresses the impacts of the proposed project on ambient air quality and the exposure of people, especially sensitive individuals, to unhealthful pollutant concentrations. Air pollutants of concern include ozone, carbon monoxide, particulate matter, and oxides of nitrogen. This section analyzes the type and quantity of emissions that would be generated by the construction and operation of the proposed project. Climate/Meteorology Air quality is affected by both the rate and location of pollutant emissions and by meteorological conditions that influence movement and dispersal of pollutants. Atmospheric conditions such as wind speed, wind direction, and air temperature gradients, along with local topography, provide the link between air pollutant emissions and air quality. The City of Lake Elsinore is located entirely within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). The SCAB incorporates approximately 12,000 square miles within four counties-San Bernardino, Riverside, Los Angeles, and Orange-including some portions of what was previously known as the Southeast Desert Air Basin. In May 1996,the boundaries of the SCAB were changed by the California Air Resources Board (CARE)to include the Beaumont-Banning area. The distinctive climate of the SCAB is determined by its terrain and geographic location. The SCAB is a coastal plain with connecting broad valleys and low hills, bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the southwest and high mountains around the rest of its perimeter. The general region lies in the semi-permanent high- pressure zone of the eastern Pacific, resulting in a mild climate tempered by cool sea breezes with light average wind speeds. The usually mild climatological pattern is interrupted occasionally by periods of extremely hot weather, winter storms, or Santa Ana winds. The vertical dispersion of air pollutants in the SCAB is hampered by the presence of persistent temperature inversions. High-pressure systems, such as the semi-permanent high-pressure zone in which the SCAB is located, are characterized by an upper layer of dry air that warms as it descends, restricting the mobility of cooler marine-influenced air near the ground surface, and resulting in the formation of high-level subsidence inversions. Such inversions restrict the vertical dispersion of air Page 28 •The Planning Center July, 2005 P:COL-04.OL1lnitb!StudylRi'xr-Gkr I ill-lnsial Study-fin l.dc 3. Environmental Analysis pollutants released into the marine layer, and together with strong sunlight, can produce worst-case conditions for the formation of photochemical smog. The atmospheric pollution potential of an area is largely dependent on winds, atmospheric stability, solar radiation, and terrain. The combination of low wind speeds and low-level inversions produces the greatest concentration of air pollutants. On days without inversions, or on days of winds averaging over 15 mph, smog potential is greatly reduced. Air Quality Regulations, Plans and Policies The Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) was passed in 1963 by the U.S. Congress and has been amended several times. The 1970 Clean Air Act Amendments strengthened previous legislation and laid the foundation for the regulatory scheme of the 1970s and 1980s. In 1977, Congress again added several provisions, including non-attainment requirements for areas not meeting National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program. The 1990 Amendments represent the latest in a series of federal efforts to regulate the protection of air quality in the U.S. :. In 1988, the State Legislature passed the California Clean Air Act (CCAA), which established California's _ air quality goals, planning mechanisms, regulatory strategies and standards of progress for the first time. The CCAA provides the State with a comprehensive framework for air quality planning regulation. The CCAA requires attainment of state ambient air quality standards by the earliest practicable date. Attainment Plans are required for air basins in violation of the state ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2) or nitrogen dioxide (NO2) standards. Preparation of, and adherence to, Attainment Plans are the responsibility of the local air pollution districts or air quality management districts. State and federal agencies have set ambient air quality standards for certain air pollutants. NAAQS have been established for the following criteria pollutants: CO, O3, S02, NO2, inhalable particulate matter (PM,, and PM2.,) and lead (Pb). The state standards for these criteria pollutants are more stringent than the corresponding federal standards. Table i summarizes the state and federal standards. Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •Page 29 r:tcoc-o4 VA.I.WdSudr fuZe. 3. Environmental Analysis Table 1 Ambient Air Quality Standards for Criteria Pollutants Federal Averaging California Primary Pollutant Health and Pollutant Time Standard Standard Atmospheric Effects Major Pollutant Sources 1 hour 0.09 ppm 0.12 ppm High concentrations can Motor vehicles. directly affect lungs,causing Ozone(0,) 8 hours 0.07 ppm 0.08 ppm irritation. Long-term exposure may cause damage to lung tissue. 1 hour 20 ppm 35 ppm Classified as a chemical Internal combustion engines, Carbon asphyxiant,CO interferes with primarily gasoline-powered Monoxide 8 hours 9.0 ppm g ppm the transfer of fresh oxygen to motor vehicles. (CO) the blood and deprives : sensitive tissues of oxygen. Annual * 0.05 ppm Irritating to eyes and respiratory Motor vehicles,petroleum- Nitrogen Average tract Colors atmosphere refining operations,industrial Dioxide(NOJ 1 hour 0.25 ppm * reddish-brown. sources,aircraft,ships,and railroads. Annual 0.03 ppm Irritates upper respiratory tract; Fuel combustion,chemical Average injurious to lung tissue. Can plants,sulfur recovery plants, Sulfur Dioxide 1 hour 0.25 ppm yellow the leaves of plants, and metal processing. (802) destructive to marble, iron,and 24 hours 0.04 ppm 0.14 ppm steel. Limits visibility and reduces sunlight. Annual 30 µg/m3 65 m3 May irritate eyes and Dust and fume-producing Geometric (PM } respiratory tract,decreases in industrial and agricultural 10} (PMz Mean s lung capacity,cancer and operations,combustion, Suspended Annual 50 µg/m3 increased mortality. Produces atmospheric photochemical Particulate Arithmetic haze and limits visibility. reactions,and natural activities Matter Mean (PM 10) (e.g.wind-raised dust and (PM,, PM,,) 150 µg/m3 ocean sprays). 24 hours 50 µg/m3 (PMi0) (PM,O} 15 4g/m3 PM * Monthly 1.5 µg/m3 * Disturbs gastrointestinal Present source: lead smelters, system,and causes anemia, battery manufacturing& Lead (Pb) Quarterly * 1.5 µg/m3 kidney disease,and recycling facilities.Past source: neuromuscular and neurologic combustion of leaded gasoline. dysfunction in severe cases). Decrease in ventilatory Industrial processes. functions;aggravation of asthmatic symptoms; Sulfates(SO4) 24 hours 25 µg/m3 aggravation of cardio- pulmonary disease;vegetation damage;degradation of visibility;property damage. ppm:parts per million;µg/0:micrograms per cubic meter *= standard has not been established for this pollutant/duration by this entity. Areas are classified under the Federal Clean Air Act as either"attainment" or "non-attainment" areas for each criteria pollutant based on whether the NAAQS have been achieved or not. The South Coast Air Basin is designated as a non-attainment area for 03, CO, and PM,,. Page 30 •The Planning Center July, 2005 P:ICOL-04.OE4h%nal,SrudjgRi.n kke Villa,hid lSwrdp-f: Zdc 3. Environmental Analysis Existing Air Quality The project site is located within the Source/Receptor Area (SRA) 25—Hemet/Elsinore Area—and is under SCAQMD jurisdiction. SRA 25 is designated as a non-attainment area for ozone and PM,and proposed for non-attainment under the new federal PM2_,. The communities within a given SRA are expected to have similar climatology. Additionally, similar traffic levels and the presence of local point sources contribute emissions to these areas. Subsequently, similar ambient air pollutant concentrations are expected within any given SRA. The monitoring station located closed to the project site is the Lake Elsinore Flint Street Monitoring Station located at 506 W. Flint Street in Lake Elsinore. The station does not monitor particulate matter and these values are inferred from the Perris monitoring station (located to the northeast of the project site) for PM,and the Riverside Magnolia monitoring station (located to the north of the project site)for PM2.5. The most current five years of data monitored at these stations are included in Table 2. Table 2 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Summary Number of Days Threshold Were Exceeded and Maximum Levels During Such Violations Pollutant/Standard 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 State 1-Haur>0.09 ppm 45 62 53 50 34 Federal 1-Hour> 0.12 ppm 1 12 6 7 2 Federal 8-Hour> 0,08 ppm 26 46 41 36 21 Max.1-Hour Conc. (ppm) 0.128 0.151 0.139 0.154 0.130 VUL Max 8-Hour Conc (ppm 0.104 0.120 0114 0137 0.113 AWWWA :- _ State 1-Hour>20 ppm NM NM NM NM NM State 8-Hour>9.0 ppm 0 0 0 0 0 Federal 8-Hour> 9.5 ppm 0 0 0 0 0 Max 1-Hour Conc. (ppm) NM NM NM NM NM Max.8-Hour Conc. (ppm) 4.23 4.48 1.89 1.39 1.14 �L .a���� errD7oxr� State 1-Hour>0.25 ppm 0 0 0 0 0 Max. 1-Hour Canc. (ppm 0.078 0,091 0.074 0.074 0.o90 tNial3bif?ar7(r;utatie PJVI'? :.r._ _W m.... _ _mnY> State 24-Hour> 50 ug/m3 13 16 21 17 6 Federal 24-Hour> 150 ug/m3 0 0 0 0 0 Max.24-Hour Conc. (ug/m3) 87 86 100 142 83 �i�liry7able;Parlrc�tafes.�1�_�• �w_�.� ,-�- x__-. - _�-:;.- �...- �� f _.. w . State 24-Hour> a ,....� ug/m NM NM NM NM NM Federal 24-Hour> 65 ug/m3 5 4 2 1 2 Max.24-Hour Conc. (}tg/m 93 3 79.3 74.9 75.5 73.3 .8 The Lake Elsinore Flint Street Monitoring Station did not monitor carbon monoxide in year 2001 or 2000.Data was supplemented from the Riverside Magnolia Street Monitoring Station. 2 Lake Elsinore Flint Street Monitoring Station does not monitor PM,o.Data was supplemented from the Perris Monitoring Station. 3 The Lake Elsinore Flint Street Monitoring Station does not monitor PM2.5. Data was supplemented from the Riverside Magnolia Monitoring Station. NM:not monitored ppm:parts per million;ug/m3:micrograms per cubic meter Source:South Coast Air duality Management District The data show recurring violations of both the state and federal ozone standards. The data also indicate that the area regularly exceeds the state PM,standards. The area has also exceeded the federal PM,, Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •Page 31 Pa COL04.OE1fniNa!StudylRiarrlaka v U! Leiria!srudy-f zdo 3. Environmental Analysis standards. The CO federal 8-hour standard has not been violated. The NO,standard has not been violated in the last five years within the project area or surrounding areas. Sensitive Receptors Some land uses are considered more sensitive to air pollution than others due to the types of population groups or activities involved. Sensitive population groups include children,the elderly, the acutely ill and the chronically ill, especially those with card iorespiratory diseases. Residential areas are also considered to be sensitive to air pollution because residents (including children and the elderly) tend to be at home for extended periods of time, resulting in sustained exposure to any pollutants present. Recreational land uses are considered moderately sensitive to air pollution. Although air exposure periods are generally short, exercise places a high demand on respiratory functions, which can be impaired by air pollution. In addition, noticeable air pollution can detract from the enjoyment of recreation. Industrial and commercial areas are considered the least sensitive to air pollution. Exposure periods are relatively short and intermittent, as the majority of the workers tend to stay indoors most of the time. In addition,the working population is generally the healthiest segment of the public. The proposed project site is presently surrounded by single-family and multi-family residences to the north, south and west: To the east, across Riverside Drive, is a small local general store ,which is adjoined by a small group of mobile homes. Further to the east, is Lake Elsinore. Methodology The air quality assessment for the proposed project estimates emissions associated with construction and operation of the proposed project. The impact analysis contained in this section was prepared in accordance with the methodologies provided by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as included in the URBEMIS2002 model.The calculated emissions of the project are compared to thresholds of significance for individual projects using the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook recommends assessing emissions of reactive organic compounds (ROC or ROG) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) as indicators of ozone because they are ozone precursors. Thresholds of Significance The SCAQMD has established thresholds of significance for air quality for construction activities and project operation as shown in Table 3 below. Table 3 SCAQMD Threshold Of Significance Air Pollutant Construction Phase Operational Phase Reactive Organic Gases ROG 75 Ibs/day 55 Ibs/day Carbon Monoxide CO 550 Ibs/day 550 lbs/day Nitrogen Oxides NO 100 Ibs/day 55 ibs/day Sulfur Oxides S0 150 Ibs/day 150 Ibs/day Particulates PM,,) 150lbs/day 150lbs/day Where available,the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Page 32 •The Planning Center July, 2005 R ICOL-0k.0F_}rnil" 'dj 4Rar W,V7 fnitial Study-frnuLr4r 3. Environmental Analysis a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less Than Significant Impact. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regulates air emissions in the South Coast Air Basin. The SCAQMD is required, pursuant to the Clean Air Act, to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants for which the SCAB is in non-attainment. Strategies to achieve these emission reductions are developed in the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) prepared by SCAQMD for the region. The AQMP outlines regional programs and control measures to reduce future emissions based on population projections. The AQMP is based on Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)projections, as well as on the requirements and projections included in the General Plans for those communities located within the South Coast Air Basin. Projects that are consistent with the local General Plan are considered consistent with the air quality-related Regional Plan. As discussed in Section 3.9, Land Use and Planning, the proposed project would require a General Plan Amendment to convert from a commercial land use designation to a proposed medium high density residential land use designation. Although the project was not included in the projections of AQMP, the proposed project is located on an approximately 5-acre site, and includes no more than 51 residential units, resulting in a population increase of 170 individuals.' In addition, the project would result in emissions which are below the SCAQMD significance thresholds. The SCAQMD significance thresholds assist in achieving the goals of the AQMP by identifying those projects that would generate substantial amounts of emissions. Because the project would result in emissions which are substantially below the SCAQMD significance thresholds for both the construction and operational phases of the project, the SCAQMD does not consider this project to be a substantial air pollutant emitter. As such,the proposed project would be considered a conflict with any applicable air quality plan. Therefore, impacts are less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. /1 b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project includes construction and subsequent operation of the proposed 51 unit townhouse residential development on an approximately 5-acre site. Air pollutant emissions associated with the project would occur over the short-term, from site preparation and building construction activities, to support the proposed land use. In addition, emissions would result from the long-term operation of the completed project. Short-Term Air Quality Impacts Construction activities would result in the generation of air pollutants. These emissions would primarily be 1) exhaust emissions from powered construction equipment, 2) dust generated from earthmoving, excavation and other construction activities, 3) motor vehicle emissions associated with vehicle trips, and 4) hydrocarbon emissions from the application of asphalt, paints, and coatings. The proposed project would be constructed in one phase. The URBEMIS2002 computer model calculations were modeled on a worst-case scenario based on a construction start date of late 2005. Air pollutant emissions associated with the project could occur over the short-term from project-related construction activities. The analysis included is based on the URBEMIS2002 computer model. The model separates out the grading and building phases, as these operations would not be expected to overlap. On the other hand, as a reasonable worst-case, the model does assume that both the 3 Population projections calculated assuming 3.34 persons per household as defined by the US Census Tract 430.04 residential neighborhood. Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •Page 33 - P;ICOL-04.0E}Wl,.J Sm4lRi—L k.Vdl,r N dW S1.dp-(r ldx - 3. Environmental Analysis construction and painting of the structures and the application of asphalt does overlap. The model run is included in Appendix B. Table 4 Daily Construction Emissions Pollutants(Ib/day) Source CO NOX ROO SOX PM,a Site Grading 2005 29 25 4 0 51 Building Construction 2006 30 24 4 0 1 Building Construction 2007 73 56 71 0 2 SCAOMD Threshold 550 100 75 150 150 Exceeds Threshold NO NO NO NO No As shown in Table 4 above, grading and construction emissions would be below SCAQMD thresholds. Long-Term Air Quality Impacts The major source of long-term air quality impacts from the proposed project is associated with the emissions produced from project-generated vehicle trips. Stationary sources related to the use of natural gas to meet the heating demands of the proposed structures and landscape maintenance add only minimally to these values. Trip rates for the proposed project were based on the Traffic Analysis conducted by Urban Crossroads, "Tentative Parcel Map 32674 Traffic Impact Analysis" (dated June, 2005),for condominium and townhome developments. Based on 10.24 trips per day per unit, the proposed project would generate as many as 522 average daily trips (ADT). Emissions generated by project-related trips and stationary sources are based on the URBEMIS2002 computer model. Project emissions from these trips are included in Table 5. No emissions are projected to exceed their respective criterion; therefore, no long- term air quality impacts would occur as a result of the operational phase of the proposed project. Table 5 Daily Operational Emissions Pollutants(lb/day) Source co NOX ROG S02 PM10 Summery z - .�_.� .-� ry --- Mobile Sources 65 6� 5 <1 5 Area Sources 1 <1 3 <1 <1 Operational Total 66 6 9 <1 5 Threshold 550 55 55 150 150 Exceeds Threshold NO NO NO NO NO Mobile Sources fii -8 .5___ .__,.<:1__�=_ 5 Area Sources <1 <1 3 <1 <1 Operational Total 61 9 8 <1 5 Threshold 550 55 55 150 150 Exceeds Threshold NO NO NO NO NO Page 34 •The Planning Center July, 2005 Y:1L'Of,-OQAL41nival Srrdy4Rnz�.€r Vr!!ar lnrtic!Srudy-(r'naldx 3. Environmental Analysis c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Less Than Significant Impact. In accordance with SCAQMD methodology, any project that does not exceed or can be mitigated to less than the daily threshold values, does not add significantly to a cumulative impact. URBEMIS modeling demonstrates that project implementation would not result in emissions in excess of the SCAQMD threshold value. Furthermore, the project is considered consistent with the AQMP, which forms the basis for attainment of the Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS). As a result,the project would not have the potential to temporarily delay the attainment of the AAQS. Consequently, the project does not add significantly to any cumulative impact. No mitigation measures are necessary. d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less Than Significant Impact. An impact is also potentially significant if emission levels exceed the State or Federal Ambient Air Quality Standards thereby exposing receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Because CO is produced in greatest quantities from vehicle combustion and does not readily disperse into the atmosphere, adherence to ambient air quality standards is typically demonstrated through an analysis of localized CO concentrations. Areas of vehicle congestion have the potential to create "pockets" of CO called "hot spots." These pockets have the potential to exceed the State 1-hour standard of 20 ppm or the 8-hour standard of 9.0 ppm. Note that the Federal levels are based on 1-and 8-hour standards of 35 and 9 ppm, respectively. Thus, an exceedance condition will occur based on the State standards prior to exceedance of the C070Federal standard. Because traffic congestion is highest at intersections where vehicles queue and are subject to reduced speeds,these hot spots are typically produced at intersection locations. Typically, for an intersection to exhibit a significant CO concentration, it would operate at level of service (LOS) D or worse. All local intersections currently operate at LOS C or better during the worst-case peak periods and would continue to do so with project implementation. Due to the minimal amount of vehicle traffic generated by the project, the project would not generate any CO hot spots or site sensitive receptors proximate to any intersections that are subject to significant CO concentrations. As such, the project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. No significant impact would result from this project, and no mitigation measures are necessary. e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Less Than Significant Impact. Odors are one of the most obvious forms of air pollution to the general public. Odors can present significant problems for both the source and the surrounding community. Although offensive odors seldom cause physical harm, they can cause agitation and concern to the general public. The potential odors associated with the project are from the application of asphalt and paint during the construction period, and from residential homes caused by cooking odors. These odors, if perceptible, are common in the environment and would be of very limited duration. Therefore, any odor impacts would not be considered significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •Page 35 P--ICOLr04,0C1[m,.1 S,.JY1Riv..1,h,Vill.,inaial Srudp f,I..d,, i 3. Environmental Analysis 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. The City of Lake Elsinore is enrolled in the Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. The proposed project site is designated as developed, disturbed land according to the Riverside County General Plan, Elsinore Area Plan, MSHCP Conservation Area. The site has been developed in the past, and is currently in a highly disturbed state. There are no identified special or sensitive species that have been located on the proposed project site. No mitigation measures will be necessary. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. According to the Riverside County General Plan, Elsinore Area Plan with Vegetation, Cells and Cell Groups Keyed to MSHCP Criteria Map, the proposed project site is designated as developed, disturbed land, and does not contain any areas of riparian habitat. No mitigation measures are necessary. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. According to the MSHCP Mapped Wetland Resources, the proposed project site does not contain any areas of federally protected wetlands, marshes, vernal pools, etc.The proposed project site is highly disturbed and has been previously developed. No impacts in relation to the proposed project are anticipated. No mitigation measures are necessary. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed,project site is surrounded by developed lands, mostly residential uses,to the north, east and west, and is characterized by ornamental trees, weeds and non- native grasses growing through and around the existing concrete foundations. Riverside Drive (SR 74) parallels the southern boundary of the site, while the Leach Canyon Flood Control Channel parallels the eastern boundary of the site, separating the site from residential uses located to the east. The site has been developed previously, and because of the existing surrounding uses of the site, its ability to serve as a wildlife corridor is extremely limited. Development of the proposed project also entails removal of all onsite vegetation. Project implementation may potentially impact roosting birds on the project site. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), a national ordinance, and Sections 3503, 3503.5 and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, a state ordinance, protect nests of all native birds. Removal by the project of one or more active nests of birds protected by MBTA and/or Sections 3503, 3503.5 and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code or disturbances that would cause abandonment of active raptor nests containing eggs or young would be a violation of MBTA and/or Sections 3503, 3503.5 and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code and thus a significant impact. In accordance with MBTA, project construction activities Page 36 *The Planning Center July, 2005 P:4COl.-64.OEVeitul Smdy�Ria l k,Vill,,twwI D dy fi-kdx 3. Environmental Analysis should be scheduled to avoid the nesting season to the extent possible. in the project area, protected species breed from February through August. However, some raptors begin nest-building as early as January and may have young in the nest through September. If it is not possible to schedule construction between October and December,then a preconstruction survey will be required no more than two days prior to the initiation of project activities during the early part of the breeding season. If an active nest is found within the limits of construction activities, a qualified ornithologist shall determine the extent of a construction-free buffer zone (typically 250 feet for raptors, variable for other species) to establish around the nest and will conspicuously flag off the buffer area around the nest(s). The construction crew will be instructed to avoid any activities in this zone until the bird nest(s) is/are no longer occupied, per a subsequent survey by the qualified ornithologist. Compliance with MBTA would reduce any potential impacts to nesting birds to a less-than-significant level. Therefore, no significant impacts on habitat modification and special status species would occur as a result of the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are necessary. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact. The proposed project site does not contain any locally designated species and therefore, would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. No impact would occur as a result of the proposed project. No mitigation measures are necessary. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. The proposed project site is designated as Urban according to the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Existing Vegetation Map, and the implementation of the project would not conflict with any �j� existing habitat conservation plan. No significant impact is anticipated from the implementation of the proposed project. No mitigation measures are necessary. 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §'15064.5? No Impact. . Section 10564.5 defines historic resources as resources listed or determined to be eligible for listing by the State Historical Resources Commission, a local register of historical resources, or the lead agency. Generally a resource is considered to be "historically significant", if it meets one of the following criteria: i) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage; Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; iii) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or iv) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history (§15064.5) Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore Page 37 PrICYJL-0¢.OEllnitml Seruly}Rnxrleke Yr!!ar lniriul SrHdy frtel.dM- 3. Environmental Analysis The proposed project site has been previously developed, is highly disturbed and is surrounded by residential uses. There is no evidence of historic or prehistoric cultural resources. The project site is not associated with the lives of persons important to our past, does not contain any distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values, nor yields information important in prehistory or history. Therefore, no impact would result from the development of the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are necessary. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to§ 15064.5? No Impact. According to CEQA Guideline§15064.5 and Public Resources Code §21083.1, the proposed development would be considered to have a significant impact if it would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resource (i.e. an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that without merely adding to the current body of knowledge,there is a high probability that is contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions, has a special and particular quality such as being the older or the best available example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person). Due to the development that has previously occurred on this site, it is unlikely that any archaeological resources would be found as a result of project development. No significant impacts would occur as a result of the development of the proposed school. No mitigation measures are necessary. c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? No Impact. No significant paleontological resources are known to exist on the project site. Due to the development that has occurred on the project site in the past, it is considered unlikely that any paleontological resources would be uncovered as a result of project development. No significant impacts would occur as a result of the proposed project. No mitigation measures are necessary. d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less Than Significant Impact. While no human remains are known to exist on the project site or in the vicinity of the project site and no Native American burial ground has been identified on the project site, if an unexpected discovery of human remains is identified at any time, the Applicant shall follow guidelines addressed in California Health and Safety Code section 7050.5, which requires the Riverside County Coroner to be notified and, in coordination with the Native American Heritage Commission, make a determination on the disposition of the remains. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary. 3.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map, issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Page 38 •The Planning Center July, 2005 P:}COLOQ.DE4Iniricl Sardj'lRiabk Vitk,lrrnro[Soudy-frro(dx 3. Environmental Analysis r+ i inns nrr�� mr Less Than Significant Impact. Fault rupture occurs when an active fault displaces in two separate directions during an earthquake. Concern about the growing number of structures located on or near active and potentially active faults led the state of California to enact the Alquist-Priolo Geologic Hazard Zone Act of 1972. The Act was revised in 1975 and renamed the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Act. Sudden surface rupture from severe earthquakes can cause extensive property damage, but even the slow movement known as "fault creep" can cause displacement that results in offset or disfiguring of curbs, streets, and building. The site is located within a seismically active region that is known for its major geological structures, active faults and historic seismicity. Because the site is in a seismically active region; it is reasonable to assume that the site would be subject to future seismic shaking that may occur along local or regional faults. According to the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, Public Safety and Urban Services Element, the major faults within the Elsinore zone are the Glen Ivy North,the Wildomar, and the Willard faults. A major earthquake along any of these faults would be capable of generating seismic hazards and strong ground shaking effects at the project site. However, the project site is not located within or adjacent to the above mentioned faults, nor is it in an Earthquake Fault Zone, as defined by the State of California in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. No known faults cross the site. Therefore, significant impacts are anticipated from the implementation of the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are necessary. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Less.Than Significant Impact. Ground shaking from earthquakes accounts for nearly all �n earthquake losses. Many factors determine the severity of ground shaking at a given �� location, such as size of earthquake, length of fault rupture, depth of hypocenter,type of faulting (dip sip/strike slip), directional attenuation, amplification, earth materials and others. Due to the location of the site with respect to regional faulting and the recorded historical seismic activity, moderate to severe ground shaking could be anticipated during the fife of the proposed school facilities. Therefore, seismic impact resulting from strong earthquakes should be expected within the design life of the proposed project. The proposed project would be designed in accordance with seismic requirements of the California Building Code (CBC), Title 24 California Code of Regulations, and would be required to meet the standards of the Division of the State Architect for seismic safety. Compliance with established standards would reduce the risk of structural collapse to less than significant, and no - mitigation measures are necessary. iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less Than Significant Impact. Liquefaction is the loss of strength of cohesionless soils when water pressure in the soil becomes equal to the confining pressure. Liquefaction generally occurs as a "quicksand" type of ground failure caused by strong ground shaking. The primary factors influencing liquefaction potential include depth to groundwater, soil type, relative density of the sandy soils, confining pressure, and the intensity and duration of ground shaking. In the Lake Elsinore area, the groundwater level and poorly consolidated alluvial materials in the floodplain area and valley floor create areas susceptible to liquefaction. According to the Seismic Hazard Map contained in the Elsinore Area Plan of the Riverside County General Plan, the proposed project site is located in an area of very high liquefaction potential. The Applicant is required to complete a geotechnical survey prior to grading, and the proposed project would be designed in accordance with seismic requirements of the California Building Code (CBC) Title 24 California Code of Regulations, Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore *Page 39 P.gCOf.-04.OFVnrtaJfStrdj lR:rx kke Vill-Inifwl Study fiwl.da 3. Environmental Analysis and would be required to meet the.standards of the Division of the State Architect for seismic safety. Compliance with established standards would reduce the risk of structural collapse due to liquefaction to less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary. IV) Landslides? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project site is relatively flat, and according to the grade levels described in the Slope Instability Map of the Elsinore Area Plan of the Riverside County General Plan , the project area has low to no susceptibility to landslides. Therefore, a significant impact is not anticipated. No mitigation measures are necessary. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant Impact. Implementation of the proposed project may result in soil erosion during and after construction until landscaping and ground cover are established. However, erosion potential is considered minimal. No substantial alteration of the existing topography is anticipated, and landscape plans will incorporate irrigation and erosion control measures in compliance with City regulations. Impacts from the proposed project are anticipated to be less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Section 3.6 (a, iii) the proposed project site, according to the Seismic Hazard Map contained in the Elsinore Area Plan of the Riverside County General Plan, , is located in an area of very high liquefaction potential. However,the proposed project would be designed in accordance with seismic requirements of the California Building Code (CBC) Title 24 California Code of Regulations, and would be required to meet the standards of the Division of the State Architect for seismic safety. Compliance with established standards would reduce the risk of structural collapse due to liquefaction to less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Less Than Significant Impact. According to the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, Public Safety and Urban Services Element,the Lake Elsinore basin floor primarily consists of recent alluvial deposits which are poorly consolidated sediments (clay, silt, sand and gravel) deposited by streams flowing into Lake Elsinore. Fill material used for cut and fill slopes during site grading will conform to the requirements of the Uniform Building Code. Therefore, no impact related to expansive soils is anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? No Impact. The proposed project site will be served by the existing sewer system, and will not require the installation of any additional lines, nor will it require the installation of septic tanks or an alternative waste water disposal system. No impacts due to the implementation of the proposed project are anticipated. No mitigation measures are necessary. Page 40 •The Planning Center July, 2005 P:}COL-04.OLllnitial Se,vdplRiurG,kr Villa.,lulu.!Study-f-Ad- 3. Environmental Analysis 2. 3.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? Less Than Significant Impact. While grading and construction activities of the proposed project may involve the limited transport, storage, use or disposal of hazardous materials, such as in the fueling/servicing of construction equipment onsite, activity would be short-term or one-time in nature and . would be subject to Federal, State and local health and safety requirements. Long-term use for the project consists of residential uses, and would not involve the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials. The proposed project would not create a significant hazard.to the public or the environment. Therefore, impacts of the project would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Section 3.7(a), the proposed project is a residential development that would not create a significant hazard to the public or to the environment involving the release of hazardous materials. No significant quantities of hazardous materials would be located on site as a result of the proposed project, and no significant impacts associated with the accidental release of hazardous materials in the environment are anticipated. No mitigation measures are necessary. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, �� or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? �� Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project site is located approximately .2 miles to the east of Lakeside High School, 32593 Riverside Dr. The proposed project entails development of a 51-unit . . residential area, and does not include development of any commercial or industrial uses. Therefore, the proposed project would not emit hazardous emissions or involve handling of hazardous or acutely r hazardous materials. No significant impacts associated with the accidental release of hazardous materials within one-quarter mile of a school site would occur, and no mitigation measures are necessary. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled t > pursuant to Government code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? No Impact. The proposed project site is not identified on any government lists as containing hazardous materials. The proposed project would not create any hazards to the public or the environment, and therefore no significant impact would result. No mitigation measures are necessary. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. Perris Valley Airport, a public-use airport mainly used for skydiving flights run by Skydive Perris, is located approximately 11 miles northeast of the project site, and would not result in a safety hazard for people residing in the proposed project area. No mitigation measures are necessary. . Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •Page 41 R'gCOL-04.OEYlnBral Stadp}Qisra bke VrUa+fniricl S+adj faal.dx I 3. Environmental Analysis f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. Skylark Airport, a private airstrip used mainly for skydiving trips run by Skydive Lake Elsinore, is approximately 4.89 miles southeast of the proposed project site. The proposed project is not within the airport influence area. No mitigation measures are necessary. g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. The proposed project would not interfere with the implementation of the city's emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.The proposed project has incorporated a fire access lane, which will remain locked (and will have break-away gates for emergency fire truck access) in addition to the main entrance. Both entrances are off of Riverside Dr. No impacts to emergency responses or evacuation plans are anticipated. No mitigation measures are necessary. h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? No Impact. According to the Wildfire Susceptibility Map contained in the Elsinore Area Plan of the Riverside County General Plan, , the proposed project site is not located within a susceptible zone. Fire protection for the proposed site is provided by Station #85 of the Riverside County Fire Department, and is adequate to serve the needs of the proposed project site. The project site is also surrounded by developed, residential areas, and is not in close proximity to wildlands. No significant impacts are anticipated. No mitigation measures are necessary. 3.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would entail the construction of 51 single-family units on 4.95 acres in the City of Lake Elsinore. Drainage and surface water discharge from the proposed project would be typical of a residential development and would not contain any significant quantities of chemicals or other contaminants. However, site preparation could temporarily increase the amount of soil erosion and siltation entering the local storm water drainage system. The Clean Water Act delineates a national permitting system for point discharges known as the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). NPDES permits typically incorporate specific limitations for point source discharges to ensure that discharges meet permit conditions and protect state-defined water quality standards. In the State of California, nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs) are responsible for administering the NPDES permitting program and are also responsible for developing NPDES permitting requirements. The NPDES program was expanded in 1987 to include the regulation of storm water runoff originating from municipal, industrial, or construction activities. The Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board is the RWQCB for the City of Lake Elsinore. Since the proposed project would be constructed on a site exceeding one acre of land,the Clean Water Act would require the District to obtain the appropriate NPDES permit from the Santa Ana RWQCB. As part of this permit requirement, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Monitoring Program must be prepared and Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be designed to prevent erosion and siltation during the project's construction phase. The purpose of the SWPPP is to identify Page 42 •The Planning Center July, 2005 P:ICOL-0¢.OLllnioia!Studyl Ria�kr V"1L !Willa!Study�Ral.dx 3. Environmental Analysis sources of sediments and pollutants that may affect storm water quality, designate use of appropriate selected BMPs at the project site, and construct and implement storm water pollution prevention measures that would reduce water pollution associated with construction. BMPs may also include, but are not limited to,those measures specified in the California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbook for Municipal, Industrial/Commercial and Construction Activity and those measures identified by any other agency with jurisdiction over the proposed project site. Examples of BMPs that may be incorporated into the SWPPP to minimize impacts resulting from increased erosion include, but are-not limited to,the following: Preparation of erosion control plans, • Compliance with local grading codes, • Construction scheduling, Stabilization at construction entrances, • Silt fencing, Sediment traps, Sandbagging, • Straw bale barriers, _ 0 Check dams, • Outlet protection, y0 Storm drain inlet protection, • Temporary silt basins, • Planting of vegetation and/or placement of jutes on graded slopes not scheduled for construction, • Use of water trucks to prevent dust emissions, • Covering of all construction material and waste, • Proper waste handling, • Development and implementation of a spill prevention/recovery plan, • Site inspections and BMP maintenance, • Vehicle and equipment management, • Tracking, • Off-site fueling, • Concrete cleanouts, and • Education and training (tailgate storm water education for trades,tied to safety meetings). Site-specific BMPs would be established in the SWPPP. The SWPPP serves to help identify the sources of pollution that affect the quality of storm water discharges, and to describe and ensure the implementation of practices to reduce the pollutants in construction storm water discharges. The State Water Control Board, prior to the commencement of construction, must approve the SWPPP. Currently, all developments within Riverside County are required to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post construction activities,for approval by the Santa Ana RWQCB, detailing applicable post-construction BMPs prior to the approval of any construction permits. Proposed drainage for the site would be engineered to follow the existing drainage patterns. Based on The City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, Hydrology Map, drainage flows in a southeasterly direction, towards the lake. Examples of post-construction BMPs include, but are not limited to, the following: • Increased building density, • Use of natural drainage systems, • Landscaping, • Roof runoff controls, • Efficient irrigation, and • Storm drainage signage. Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •Page 43 P:ICOL-04.0E11n 1ie1 Seedj4Riir L Ae VX,l Miriwl Sikdr-f+ [dx 1 4 3, Environmental Analysis Site-specific BMPs would be established in the WQMP. The proposed project would comply with all applicable rules and regulations to reduce non-storm water discharges by designing, constructing, and operating an on-site drainage system, and by developing and implementing a WQMP. The WQMP would include BMPs to identify and reduce sediment and other pollutants in storm water discharges. Mandatory compliance with NPDES permit requirements through the preparation of both SWPPP and WQMP would ensure that no water quality standards or discharge requirements are violated and would reduce impacts on water quality to a less-than-significant level. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur as a result of the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are necessary. b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Less Than Significant Impact. The project is located within the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD), which provides water to a 96-square mile area in western Riverside County. The District derives its water sources from local groundwater and surface sources and supplements these sources with imported water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD). The District obtains its main local groundwater source from the Pauba Formation Aquifer, located northwest and southeast of the Lake through eight active wells in the Elsinore Basin. Groundwater storage in the basin is estimated at 1,155,000 acre feet of water. Natural inflow to the Elsinore Basin is estimated at 800 acre feet per year.'According to the Groundwater Management Plan,the Elsinore Basin may be in a current state of overdraft, by 4,400 acre feet per year. To minimize overdraft, the EVMWD imports 52.1%of their water from the MWD, while only 39.6% is derived from the wells in Lake Elsinore and three additional wells in Corona,the Elsinore Basin and the Temescal Basin, respectively. The remainder of the water comes from the Canyon Lake Plant. Currently, the EVMWD is considering the development of a groundwater storage program to "bank" water during wet periods and extract this water during droughts. In addition, the Lake has historically undergone periods of drying up, which reduces water quality and compromises fish and wildlife habitat. To maintain stable lake levels and minimize flooding during wet years, the Lake Elsinore Management Project was initiated by the EVMWD. Current lake levels are approximately 1,235 feet in elevation with storm water runoff and the use of recycled water. The proposed project would require 15,300 gallons of water per day, or approximately 17 acre feet of water per year, based upon a development of 51 dwelling units. Consequently, the project would not substantially deplete groundwater supply, as it comprises less than 0.5%of the total groundwater in the Elsinore Basin. Moreover, most of EVMWD water is imported. Additionally, the proposed project would not substantially interfere with groundwater recharge. The proposed project is located within the Elsinore Basin. Stormwater flows that currently flow within the Elsinore Basin, and to Lake Elsinore, do not represent a significant source of groundwater recharge (as stated in the Santa Ana River Basin Water Quality Control Plan). Therefore, impacts to groundwater recharge from the implementation of the project are considered less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. 'Department of Water Resources, Planning and Local Assistance, California's Groundwater Bulletin 118, Elsinore Groundwater Basin, February 27, 2004. Page 44 •The Planning Center July, 2005 P,kCOL-04.0L11-flo1 SrrdylRi lckr Vil!slnniel.Sudj-fnnL� 3. Environmental Analysis f -r c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Less Than Significant Impact. Urban development has two typical effects on storm runoff hydrology: an increase in total runoff volume, and faster rising and higher peak flows. The increased area of impervious surfaces such as roads, parking lots, sidewalks, and buildings prevents natural infiltration to the soil, and thus creates higher runoff volumes. More rapid transport of runoff over smooth artificial surfaces and drainage facilities, combined with the higher volume of runoff causes elevated peak flows. This increase in flows may adversely affect downstream channels. Based on the topographic data, surface water runoff would generally flow in a southeasterly direction. Implementation of the proposed project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern on the site, as drainages would be engineered to maintain the existing pattern of water flows on the site. Erosion and siltation due to wind and rainfall are more likely to occur when soils are exposed. During grading for the proposed project, the soils would continue to be exposed; however, upon completion of " the grading for the proposed project,the soils would be covered with impervious surfaces or with landscaping, both of which would serve to reduce or prevent erosion and siltation on-and off-site. The project would not involve an alteration of the course of a stream or river. Implementation of the NPDES permit requirements, as they apply to the site, would reduce potential erosion, siltation and water quality impacts resulting from the project to a less-than-significant level. In addition, the use of landscaping and construction of an on-site drainage system would further reduce potential erosion and siltation impacts of the completed residential development. Development of the proposed project would not create substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site, and impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the r alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? Less Than Significant Impact. As noted in previous subsections, implementation of the proposed project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern on the site, as drainages would be engineered to maintain the existing pattern of water flows on the site, and catch basins and structural and non-structural BMPs would be employed on the site to capture and treat runoff to the maximum extent feasible. Additionally,while project implementation would replace the existing pervious soil and 1 vegetation on the site with compacted building pads and structures, no significant increase in urban runoff from the project site would occur, as the site was previously developed and much impervious material remains. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in flooding on-or offsite, and impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project would not exceed the capacity of the existing storm water drainage system of Lake Elsinore because the project would t..- construct an on-site storm drainage system. Water would then be discharged into the Leach Canyon Flood Control Channel, which flows directly into Lake Elsinore. To prevent polluted runoff from entering the flood control channel, flows to the channel would be cleansed through the construction of two on-site catch basins, which would each serve a dual function as a catch basin and a water-quality basin. Implementation of this BMP, identified in the WQMP, would reduce any potential impacts of development to runoff water quality to a level of less than significant. Potential impacts to runoff water quality during Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •Page 45 P:}COU09.DEl7rsitialStredy}Riarrrleke Villas 1niti.]Study fia l d. 3. Environmental Analysis discharge into the Leach Canyon Flood Control Channel. Any impacts to the downstream receiving water body (Lake Elsinore) would be reduced to a level of less than significant through implementation of the site-specific WQMP. No additional mitigation is required. o) Create the potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would alter the flow velocity of the stormwater runoff and volume entering the Leach Canyon Flood Control Channel.As a result,the proposed project would include the installation of two catch basins in the southern portion of the property. Stormwater flows would drain via the interior roads of the project, where they would collect into the proposed catch basins before discharging into the flood control channel. Installation of the catch basins would mitigate any impacts to stormwater flow velocity. No additional mitigation measures are necessary. p) Create significant increases in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not result in increases in erosion or siltation on-site or in the surrounding areas. Any impacts to the Leach Canyon Flood Control Channel from construction of the proposed project would be reduced by implementation of the SWPPP while adherence to the WQMP would result in BMPs that would adequately control erosion or siltation from long-term residential uses. Impacts are considered less than significant in this regard. No mitigation measures are necessary. 3.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING a) Physically divide an established community? No Impact. The areas surrounding the proposed project site currently include residential uses. Single- and multi-family homes exist along the western and northern border of the site. The proposed project would introduce 51 single family dwellings to the area. Residential development within the proposed project site would be compatible with existing uses and would not physically divide an established community. No mitigation measures are necessary. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to.the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less Than Significant Impact.The applicant is currently requesting a General Plan Amendment. Currently the site is zoned R-3; however the General Plan Designation is General Commercial. After the site is redesignated,the General Plan designation will be consistent with the current zoning for the site. Medium/High Density permits up to 18 dwelling units per acre.As proposed,the project would result in a maximum of 10.3 units per acre. When the GPA is received, no further mitigation measures will be necessary. c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? No Impact. The City of Lake Elsinore is enrolled in the Riverside County Municipal Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP).According to the MSHCP,the proposed project site is developed, disturbed land, and does not have any conservation requirements attached to it. No mitigation measures are necessary. Page 48 •The Planning Center July, 2005 P:1COL-0¢.OL}lniael Stull lRi+.nrbkc Vill.,1.ai I SIxdy-fr Ldm 3. Environmental Analysis 3.10 MINERAL RESOURCES a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact. According to the Mineral Resources Map contained in the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, the proposed project site is not located within an MRZ-2 zone, which is a zone designated as having "significant mineral deposits". Additionally, the proposed project site is not designated as having any mineral resources, including construction aggregate. Therefore, there would be no loss of availability of a known mineral resource, and no mitigation measures are necessary. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. As described above,the proposed project site does not reside in a zone designated as having a locally important mineral resource, and is not delineated as a mineral resource recovery site on the Mineral Resource Map of the the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. Therefore, there would be no loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource, and no mitigation measures are necessary. 3.11 NOISE Existing Noise Environment Sound intensity is measured in decibels (dBA) that are A-weighted to correct for the relative frequency response of the human ear. That is, an A-weighted noise level includes a de-emphasis on low frequencies of sound similar to the human ear's de-emphasis of these frequencies. The zero on the decibel scale is based on the lowest sound level that the healthy, unimpaired human ear can detect. Unlike linear units (e.g., inches or pounds), decibels are measured on a logarithmic scale, representing points on a sharply rising curve. The decibel scale increases as the square of the change, representing the sound pressure energy. While 10 decibels are 10 times more intense than 1 decibel, 20 decibels is 100 times more intense and 30 decibels is 1,000 times more intense. A sound as soft as human breathing is about 10 times greater than zero decibel. The decibel system of measuring sound gives a rough connection between the physical intensity of sound and its perceived loudness to the human ear. A 10-decibel increase in sound level is perceived by the human ear as the doubling of the loudness of the sound. Ambient sounds generally range from 30 dBA (very quiet) to 100 dBA (very loud). Sound levels are generated from a source and their decibel level decreases as the distance from that source increases. This phenomenon is known as "spreading loss." Sound dissipates exponentially with distance from the noise source. For a single point source, sound level decays approximately 6 decibels for each doubling of distance from the source. if noise is produced by a line source, such as highway traffic,the sound decreases by 3 decibels for each doubling of distance in a hard site environment. Line source noise in a relatively fiat environment with absorptive vegetation decreases by 4.5 decibels for each doubling of distance. Most areas actually contain both hard and soft elements and the spreading loss is usually between these two values. The predominant rating scales for human communities in the State of California are the Equivalent- Continuous Sound Level (Leq) and the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) based on A-weighted decibels (dBA). The Leo is the total sound energy of time-varying noise over a sample period. The CNEL is the time-varying noise over a 24-hour period with a weighting factor applied to noises occurring during evening hours from 7:00 p.m.to 10:00 p.m. (relaxation hours -weighting factor of 5 decibels) and at Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •Page 49 Pa COL-04.OG11niiinl Andy IRnrileke ViUcr Wri I Stxdy-f.,Ldx 3. Environmental Analysis night from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. (sleeping hours-weighting factor of 10 decibels). The Day/Night noise level (Ldn) is calculated in a manner similar to the CNEL but does not add the evening weighting of 5 dBA. The Ldn applies the 24-hour Leq as the baseline noise limit, but then requires the limit to be lowered by 10 dBA at night. The noise environments discussed in this report are specified in terms of the Leq noise levels, as well as Ldn. The Leq scale is used to assess stationary source impacts subject to local regulation while the Ldn addresses increases in ambient noise on community receptors. Another noise metric also widely used in noise standards is measured in terms with percentile noise levels. For example, the L,fl noise level represents the noise level that is exceeded 10 percent of the time. The L.,noise level represents the median noise level. Half the time the noise level exceeds this level and half the time the noise level is less than this level. The L�noise level represents the noise level exceeded 90 percent of the time and is considered the lowest noise level experienced during the monitoring period. For a relatively constant noise source,the Leq and L50 are approximately the same. Methodology This analysis includes those noise impacts from traffic on the proposed development and the project's contribution to noise on the adjacent residential areas. The generation of noise associated with the proposed project would occur over the short-term from site preparation and construction activities to implement the proposed project. In addition, noise would result from the long-term operation of the project. Both short-term and long-term noise impacts associated with the project are examined in this analysis. Regulatory Background To limit population exposure to physically and/or psychologically damaging, as well as intrusive noise levels, the federal government, the State of California, various County governments and most municipalities in the State have established standards and ordinances to control noise. Federal Government The federal government regulates occupational noise exposure common in the workplace through the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) under the USEPA. Noise exposure of this type is dependent on work conditions and is addressed through a facility's Health and Safety Plan. As any site construction will be required to operate under an approved Health and Safety Plan, occupational noise is irrelevant to this study and is not addressed further in this document. The US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has set a goal of 45 dBA Ldn as a desirable maximum interior standard for residential units developed under HUD funding. (This level is also generally accepted within the State of California.) While HUD does not specify acceptable exterior noise levels, standard construction of residential dwellings constructed under Title 24 standards typically provide 20 dBA of attenuation with the windows closed. Based on this premise,the exterior Ldn should not exceed 65 dBA. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service have customarily applied a 60 dBA CNEL guideline for assessing noise impacts for protected sensitive habitats. Noise levels at or above this threshold are assumed to indirectly affect the reproductive success of certain species of birds, increase stress levels, and interfere with predator avoidance, among other impacts. State of California Page 50 •The Planning Center July, 2005 P:}COL-OG,OL•}lnrrlu!Srvd)I RFoe eke VAn 1n,tiul Srvdy-frncU. 3. Environmental Analysis The California Office of Noise Control has set acceptable noise limits for sensitive uses. Sensitive-type land uses, such as homes and schools, are"normally acceptable"in exterior noise environments up to 65 dBA CNEL and "conditionally acceptable" in areas up to 70 dBA CNEL. A"conditionally acceptable" designation implies that new construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements for each land use type is made and needed noise insulation features are incorporated in the design. By comparison, a"normally acceptable"designation indicates that standard construction can occur with no special noise reduction requirements. Applicable interior standards for new multi-family dwellings are governed by Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. These standards require that acoustical studies be performed prior to construction in areas that exceed 60 dBA Ldn. Such studies are required to establish measures that will limit interior noise to no more than 45 dBA Ldn and this level has been applied to many communities in California. City of Lake Elsinore The project site is located within the City of Lake Elsinore and is therefore subject to both the General _ Plan Noise Chapter X(NOISE) as well as the local municipal code. The goal of the Noise Chapter is to "identify noise sensitive land uses and noise sources, and define areas of noise impact for the purposes of developing programs to ensure that Lake Elsinore residents will be protected from excessive noise intrusions." According to the Noise and Land use Compatibility Matrix in the City's General Plan, residential uses are clearly compatible up to a noise environment of 60 dBA and normally compatible up to 70 dBA after noise reduction requirements are made and needed noise insulation features in the design are determined. In addition to the City's Noise and Land Use Compatibility Matrix which regulates mobile and stationary noise environments, the City regulates noise from stationary sources within the City's Municipal Code. Noise sensitive residential uses would also be limited to an interior noise level of 45 dBA Ldn. Table 6 includes the applicable noise standards as included in the City's Noise Ordinance (Ch. 17.78, City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code). Table 6 City of Cake Elsinore Exterior Noise.Standards (Ldn) Levels Not To Exceed More Than 30 Minutes In Any Hour g-t�0�3�=f�,� ��QQ�-� Single Family Residential 50 dBA 40 dBA Multiple Dwelling Residential and 50 dBA 45 dBA Public Open Space Limited Commercial and Office 60 dBA 55 dBA General Commercial 65 dBA 60 dBA Light Industrial 70 dBA Heavy Industrial 75 dBA Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore Page 51 P�COL-0¢.OEZlniticl St.4,l Ri-e�Ee Ville,lsetrel SIxd;--fi—1 dx 3. Environmental Analysis The Ordinance also allows for noise adjustment factors for short-term noise. The noise levels noted in Table 8 may be increased by as much as 5 dBA if their duration does not exceed 15 minutes per hour, 10 dBA if their duration does not exceed 5 minutes per hour and 15 dBA if their duration does not exceed 1 minute per hour. The standards are not to be exceeded by 20 dBA for any period. The City recognizes that construction noise is temporary in nature and therefore regulates noise from construction equipment to the least noise sensitive portions of the day. Section 17.78.080 F under "Prohibited Acts", which prohibits noise sources associated with the operation of any tools and equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Monday through Friday and at any time on Sundays or any legal holidays. Existing Conditions The project site is bounded by single-family residential units along its western, northern and southern boundary. In addition, a general store is located across the street to the east adjacent to the Lake Elsinore. The noise within the proposed project area is generally indicative of rural areas except for minor increases in ambient noise levels caused by the adjacent schoolyard and nearby roadway noise. Methodology Related To Noise The generation of noise associated with the proposed project would occur over the short-term from site preparation and construction activities to implement the proposed project. In addition, noise would result from the long-term operation of the project from project related vehicle trips. This analysis includes those noise impacts from traffic on the proposed development and the project's contribution to noise on the adjacent noise sensitive uses. Both short-term and long-term noise impacts associated with the project are examined in this analysis. The assessment of potential noise impacts attributable to the proposed project involves quantification of noise levels associated with the construction and operations phases of the project. Construction noise levels are obtained from published documentation of noise levels for various pieces of construction equipment. Noise levels are extrapolated from the distance they were initially measured at to those distances where noise sensitive uses may be affected by project construction activities to account for attenuation of noise due to distance. Construction noise at noise sensitive uses proximate to the project site is then evaluated for potential significant impacts based on City noise regulations. Quantification of noise generated by project traffic utilizes traffic modeling based on the Caltrans' Sound2000 Traffic Noise Prediction Model. Increases in noise are evaluated for potential significant noise impacts based on whether a discernable change in noise levels could occur if noise levels would exceed the City's land use compatibility to noise. A discernable change in noise levels for human hearing in outdoor environments requires a minimum of a 3 decibel change in noise levels. Noise level increases that result in noise levels which are below the City's acceptable noise levels as listed in the City's land use compatibility to noise are not considered to result in a significant noise impact. a} Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less Than.Significant Impact. The proposed project consists of multi-family residential uses. The primary source of project-generated noise during the operations phase of the project would be traffic noise. Based on the traffic report prepared for the project, the project would generate an estimate 522 average daily trips (ADT) distributed over local roadways. Noise modeling of traffic volumes with and Page 52 •The Planning Center July, 2005 PYCOI.04.OE11nrrlulRudjgHlvrkke Vi!!m lunral Study--frw[.dcr 3. Environmental Analysis without the project were conducted to determine the net change in noise levels that would occur due to the additional traffic generated by the project. The results of the traffic noise modeling are presented in Table 7 and detailed in the Appendix C T Noise Analysis. Table 7 Traffic Noise Along Riverside Drive (dBA CNEL) With.Project(No With Project Existing No Project Wall) (6 feet wall) Exterior Noise at Riverside Drive 69 71 71 65 Interior Noise at Project Residences with Windows Open 47 The noise associated with this increase in traffic volumes due to the project would result in noise level increases of less than 1 dB. This is due to the small contribution of project traffic (522 ADT) as compared to the future 2007 traffic volume of 26,000 ADT. This noise level increase is not considered to be within the threshold of detection of a change in the ambient noise levels- 6. As such, noise level increases due to project related traffic would not result in significant project related noise impacts. Locating the project site along State Route (SR) 74 may expose residents of the proposed project to substantial levels of traffic noise. Based on traffic noise modeling, the exterior noise level with the proposed sound wall would be 65 dBA CNEL with year 2007 traffic volumes for the with project traffic condition at the rear yards of the project that abut SR 74. As a result, traffic noise along Riverside drive would not exceed the City's normally compatible noise standard of 70 dBA CNEL with installation of the exterior sound wall. Therefore, future noise levels increases along Riverside Drive at the project would not result in a significant noise impact as design features are incorporated into the site design to reduce noise exposure to levels considered by the City to be within normally compatible range. Interior noise levels at project residences may also be affected by traffic along SR 74. Residential structures typically provide a 24 dB noise attenuation between exterior to interior noise levels with windows closed and 12 dB noise attenuation with windows open'. Second floor windows would not benefit from installation of the proposed six foot sound wall due to the line of sight of the traffic. As such, interior noise levels would exceed the California state standard of 45 dBA CNEL for residential uses and would represent a significant noise impact prior to the application of mitigation measures. s Federal Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, December 1978, Page 8. s Technical Noise Supplement by the California Department of Transportation, October 1998, Figure N- 2211. 'Based on the Environmental Protection Agency's "Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety," EPA/ONAC 550/9-74- 004, March, 1974. Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore a Page 53 P:ICOL-O4.OLtiInelrnl StudylRlvf'lakf VIIIaJ Initial Sfudp-final.drr 3. Environmental Analysis Table 8 Interior Noise ,Levels (dBA CNEL) With Project Exterior Noise at Riverside Drive 71 Interior Noise at Project Residences with Windows Open 59 Interior Noise at Project Residences with Windows Closed 47 Mitigation Measure 1. An acoustic engineer will be hired to evaluate and prescribe building specific acoustic measures to ensure that interior noise levels would comply with the State's interior noise standard. With the incorporation of mitigation measure 1,the proposed project would comply with the State's interior noise standard and would not result in a significant noise impact relative to interior noise levels. b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne. noise levels? Less Than Significant Impact. Construction equipment utilized during project development would produce vibration from vehicle travel as well as minimal demolition and grading activities. An estimated 10,000 cubic yards would be excavated and balanced onsite. Vibration calculations assumed single family residences are located 100 feet from vibration generating construction activities related to the project. Table 9 list the levels of vibration that would be experienced at the nearest vibration sensitive receivers. The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has established vibration level thresholds that would cause annoyance to a substantial number of people or damage to building structures. The FTA criteria for vibration induced structural damage is 0.20 inch per second for the peak particle velocity (PPV). Project construction activities would result in PPV levels which are below the FTA's criteria for vibration induced structural damage. As such, project construction activities would not result in a significant vibration impacts from vibration induced structural damage to buildings proximate to the project site. The FTA criteria for vibration induced annoyance is 80 Vibration Velocity (VdB) for residential uses. 65 VdB is the approximate threshold of perception". Construction of the project would generate levels of vibration that are below the FTA criteria for nuisance for office uses. Because project construction activities would not generate levels of vibration that exceed the FTA's vibration annoyance threshold, no significant vibration impact from exposure of persons to excessive levels of vibration would occur during project construction activities.. Table 9 Vibration Levels from Project Construction Activities Approximate Approximate RMS Approximate RMS a Velocity Level at Velocity at 25 ft, Approximate Velocity Velocity at 100 ft, Equipment 25 ft, Vd8 (inch/second) Level at 100 ft, VdB (inch/second) Small bulldozer 58 0.003 46 0.0001 Jackhammer 1 79 0.035 67 0.0011 "Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, Federal Transit Administration, April 1995, Table 7-1. Page 54 •The Planning Center July, 2005 P:}COf 04.OE11nural.Srud1}RA.W,VA/ tln;rrel St dl-/r-nal kr 3. Environmental Analysis Table 9 Vibration Levels from Project Construction Activities Approximate Approximate RMS Approximate RMS a Velocity level at Velocity at 25 ft, Approximate Velocity Velocity at 100 ft,. Equipment 25 ft, VdB (inch/second) level at 100 ft, VdB {inch/second) Loaded trucks 86 0.076 74 0.0024 FTA Criteria 80 0.2 Significant Impact? No No The operational phase of land uses typically do not generate perceptible levels of vibration unless there are vibration intensive industrial uses. The project consists of a multi-family residential uses which would involve vibration intensive activities, as such the operations of the project would result in a significant vibration impact from exposure of persons to excessive levels of vibration. c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant Impact. As noted in response 3.11(a) above, increases in noise levels related to project generated traffic would result in noise levels which are less than the significance threshold of 3 dB and would likewise not result in a significant impact. Therefore, no mitigation measures are recommended. d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. Noise generated during construction is a function of construction equipment used, the location of the equipment, and the timing and duration of the noise-generating activities. Construction noise levels reported in Noise from Construction Equipment and Operations, Building Equipment, and Nome Appliances, (United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1971) were used to estimate future construction noise levels for the proposed project. Typically, the estimated construction noise level is governed primarily by the highest noise producing pieces of equipment. Table 10 presents typical noise levels generated at varying distances from project construction sites during various construction phases and under minimum and maximum equipment usage scenarios. Table 10 Noise Levels at Project Construction Sites (dBA Leq) Minimum Required All Applicable Construction Phase Equipment in Use' Equipment in Use Ground Clearing/Demolition 78 78 Excavation 73 83 Foundation Construction 72 72 Building Construction 70 79 Finishing and Site Cleanup 70 83 Based on Bolt,Beranek and Newman,"Noise from Construction Equipment and Operations,Building Equipment,and Home Appliances,"prepared for the EPA,December 31,1971, Source: The Planning Center(June 22,2005). Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore Page 55 -. P:iCOL-04OE41nrtiol SrwdplRn*rlake VilLu lnnlal Srvdy.fennLdnr 3. Environmental Analysis Construction of the proposed project would not be expected to use large quantities of construction equipment. The building construction of the multi-family residences would primarily be constructed by hand. Consequently, noise levels generated from project construction would be expected to generate those noise levels listed under the minimum required equipment in use. As such, noise levels may intermittently range from 70-83 dSA Leq at the nearest noise sensitive use. The City of Lake Elsinore allows for the generation of construction noise so long as it complies with Noise Ordinance Section 17.78.080 F under"Prohibited Acts" prohibits noise sources associated with the operation of any tools and equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Monday through Friday and at any time on Sundays or any legal holidays. Compliance with the City of Lake Elsinore's noise control ordinance would result in noise impacts which are considered to be less than significant. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The proposed project site is not located within an airport land use plan, nor is it within two miles of a public airport. The closest public airport to the proposed project site is Perris Valley Airport, located approximately 14.2 miles northeast.of site. Implementation of the proposed project would not expose the new residents to excessive aircraft noise levels. No mitigation measures would be necessary. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The proposed project site is located approximately 4.9 miles northwest of Skylark Airport, a private airstrip which mainly provides service for Skydive Elsinore. Aircraft departures for the dirt airstrip are minimal, and would not have the potential to expose residents to excessive noise levels. No mitigation measures are necessary. 3.12 POPULATION.AND HOUSING a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example,through extension of roads or other Infrastructure)? Less Than Significant Impact. Population impacts are often associated with substantial increases in population from a project. Housing impacts may result directly for construction of new housing units or indirectly from changes in housing demand associated with new non-residential development, such as office, manufacturing, and industrial uses that increase employment in an area. The proposed project would entail the construction of 51 single-family units on 4.95 acres of land, resulting in a population increase of 170 individuals.'This increase in population is within the population projections for the City of Lake Elsinore, as determined by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). According to SCAG, the City of Lake Elsinore is projected to have a population of 36,804 people in 2005. The proposed project development would contribute to .05%of the City of Lake Elsinore's population. Therefore,this increase is not considered substantial and is consistent with SCAG forecasts in this region. Impacts would be less than significant in this regard. No mitigation measures are necessary. ' Population projections calculated assuming 3.34 persons per household as defined by the US Census Tract 430.04 residential neighborhood. Page 56 •The Planning Center July, 2005 P.ICOL-04.OEIl.itia!St.d)-yRi.,&4,Viper Initial SIudy-ImAd 3. Environmental Analysis b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. The proposed project would involve the construction of 51 single family units on vacant land within the City of Lake Elsinore. The project does not have the capacity to displace existing housing. The proposed project would be growth-accommodating, and would contribute to the housing stock within the City. Therefore, no impacts related to displacement of existing housing would result, and no mitigation measures are necessary. c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. As mentioned above, the proposed project site is currently vacant, and project implementation would not require displacement of people. No impact would occur in this regard. No mitigation measures are necessary. 3.13 PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? Less Than Significant Impact. Fire service for the City of Lake Elsinore is provided by the Riverside County Fire Department, in cooperation with the California Department of Forest and Fire Protection. Due C070 to the high fire hazards adjacent to the city, the safety element in the City of Lake Elsinore's General Plan sets forth a service ratio of one full-time firefighter per 1,000 persons and a response time of five minutes for urban areas and six minutes for rural areas. The proposed project site would be served by the Riverside County Fire Department, Fire Station #85, located at 29405 Grand Avenue, approximately 3 miles northeast of the project site. The McVicker Station, recently opened in 2002, can provide the proposed project with one medical engine. Other nearby fire stations that would be able to provide back- up service for the project would include; Fire Station #10, Elsinore, located approximately 3 miles southeast of the project site; Fire Station #11, Lakeland Village, located approximately 4 miles southwest of the project site; or Fire Station #51, El Cariso, located approximately 7 miles west of the project site. The Elsinore Station can provide one City medical engine and two State engines to the project site. Adequate service can be provided by the Riverside County Fire Department for the proposed project from these facilities. All emergency calls are dispatched from the same 911 Fire Center. According to the Riverside County Fire Department, this project would not create the need for additional firefighters, nor new facilities. No mitigation measures are necessary. b) Police protection? Less Than Significant impact. The proposed project site would be served by the Riverside County Sheriff's Department/Lake Elsinore Police Department, located at 333 West Limited Avenue, approximately 3.4 miles southeast of the project site. There are currently 86 sworn officers and 23 non- sworn personnel at this station. Police staffing requirements for Lake Elsinore are one sworn officer per 1,000 persons, one supervisor and one support staff per seven officers, one patrol vehicle per three sworn officers, and five school resource officers assigned to the local middle and high schools. Although there is no average response time due to the differing nature/priority of each call received by the 911 dispatcher, every effort is made by sworn personnel at the Lake Elsinore Station to respond to "Priority Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •Page 57 - PaCOL-04.OF.11nhiu(Study}Rrrle.6e VilJ�r lnur..(Srred}frsal.Gr 3. Environmental Analysis 1" calls within 5 minutes or less. According to the Lake Elsinore Sheriff's Station, there is no need for additional sworn officers to serve this project, nor will there be a need for new facilities and/or new equipment. No mitigation measures are necessary. c) Schools? Less Than Significant Impact. The Lake Elsinore Unified School District (LEUSD)would provide educational needs to student populations generated from the proposed project. According to the LEUSD Facilities Service Department, project students would attend Withrow Elementary School (Grades K-5), Terra Cotta Middle School (Grades 6-8)and Elsinore High School (Grades 11 & 12 in 2005). Lakeside High School will open in August, 2005, and will receive 9th and 101h graders, 111h in 2006 and all grades in 2007, gradually accepting all students who formerly would have attended Elsinore High School. Based on LEUSD student generation rates per dwelling unit of 0.4165, 0.1810 and 0.1588 for elementary, middle and high schools respectively, the proposed project would generate 21 elementary school students, 9 middle school students, and 8 high school students. Pursuant to SB 50 (1998), LEUSD imposes Level I Statutory Developer Fees for new residential development. Payment of the developer fee ($3.03 per square foot of residential space) would mitigate school impacts to less than significant, and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. d) Parks? Less Than Significant Impact. Because the proposed project would involve the development of residential uses,the project would result in additional park facility users. As a standard condition of approval,the City of Lake Elsinore requires all new developments to abide by the Quimby Act (AB 1150), which enables local agencies to require the dedication of local park acreage, the payment of fees, or a combination thereof as part of the subdivision process. The park acreage standard for the City of Lake Elsinore is five acres per 1,000 persons.10 Accordingly, the proposed project would require approximately one acre of parkland". TPM 32674 does not propose park space. Therefore, the Applicant would be required to pay"in lieu" park fees to the City as a condition of project approval, and impacts would be less than significant. No additional mitigation measures are necessary. e) Other public facilities Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed residential development would have a need for public facilities such as libraries, postal service, hospitals, etc. Since the project area is already developed, these facilities already exist and would be able to provide the necessary services to the new residents. . Implementation of 51 residential units would have a less than significant impact on existing public facilities. Therefore, no mitigation measures are necessary. 3.14 RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities, such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed residential development does not involve park development or displacement. Project occupants would utilize existing neighborhood and regional parks and recreational facilities. The closest park and recreation areas to the project site are Oak Tree 10 City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. Parks and Recreation Element. 1990, revised 1995. " Based on a project generation of 170 residents (See Population and Housing Section). Page 58 •The Planning Center July, 2005 r:WOL Wti IS;xdy-f—l.dK 3. Environmental Analysis ' I Y i — mnili� giYYYYYYYY� Park, Summer Lake Park, and McVicker Park, all within three miles (to the north) of the project site. The Cleveland National Forest is located immediately west of the project site and can be accessed by continuing west along Riverside Drive (SR 74). Additionally, pursuant to the Civic Center Act, project occupants would also be able to utilize the recreational facilities located at the previously mentioned Lakeside High School when school is not in session. Usage of any these facilities would be minimal, as the proposed project would result in a total of 170 tenants, of which not all would utilize the recreational facilities. Furthermore, as mentioned in Section 3.13(d), the Applicant would be required to pay"in lieu" park fees, which would adequately address the minimal increase in City parkland uses, including maintenance of the facilities. Therefore, no significant impacts to parks or recreational facilities would occur, and no mitigation measures are necessary. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Less.Than Significant Impact. As discussed, project residents would be able to utilize existing parkland and recreational facilities, and the Applicant would be required to pay "in lieu" park fees. Existing recreational facilities within the project area would therefore meet the recreational needs of project residents. Impacts to recreational facilities would be less than significant, and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. 3.15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips,the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? 0WA�RW& Less Than Significant Impact. Urban Crossroads completed "Tentative Parcel Map 32674 Traffic Impact Analysis "(June 21, 2005) for the proposed project. (Appendix A) While the proposed project entails the development of 51 residential units on 4.95 acres, per the City requirements,the traffic study analyses the impacts, from a traffic standpoint, of the tentative parcel map's maximum density of 89 dwelling units for the 4.95 acre site (18 dwelling units/acre). The proposed project, at buildout capacity, is expected to generate 522 daily vehicle trips, as shown in Table 10. Additionally, according to the traffic analysis conducted by Urban Crossroads, per discussion with City staff, the new high school, Lakeside High School, which is located southwest of the proposed project site along Riverside Drive, should be considered as a cumulative project. All movements on Riverside Drive currently experience level of service (LOS) "D" or better operations. Additionally, signal warrant analysis has been conducted for the project access intersection for interim year with project conditions using both ADT estimation method and peak hour volume method, and both analyses indicate that the project access intersection will not warrant a signal under interim year conditions. Therefore, while the proposed project will add approximately 522 ADT, and is considered a cumulative project to the new high school, there will not be a substantial increase to traffic load, and Riverside Drive will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS. No mitigation measures are necessary. Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •Page 59 - P:}COL-04.OL}7aitiol Seudllkicrrlakr i rlfoi laitinl5tudl-fsnel dx 3. Environmental Analysis Table 11 Project-Generated Traffic Time Period Trips.Generated AM Peak Hour 7:00-8:00 a.m. In 6 Out 33 Total 39 PM Peak Hour(3:00-4:00 p.m. In 31 Out 15 Total 46 Total Daily Traffic 522 Note:Traffic analysis based on buildout of 89 residential units. Source:Urban Crossroads b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Less Than.Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated.The proposed project is expected to generate approximately 522 daily vehicle trips. According to Urban Crossroads traffic analysis, all movements on Riverside Drive experience level of service (LOS) "D" or better operations. The project access intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable LOS during both AM and PM peak hours based on the existing geometry condition along Riverside Drive. Based on future lane geometry, with the implementation of 3 through lanes in each direction along Riverside Drive, the intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable LOS during AM peaks hours, however it would operate at an acceptable LOS during PM peak hours. The project access intersection will not warrant a traffic signal under project buildout (2007) conditions, and no other physical improvements can provide an acceptable LOS for the minor street left turn movement of the intersection, therefore the traffic analysis recommends that the project access be restricted to right turn in/out and left turn in only An alternative to this mitigation measure would be to restrict project access to right turn in/out only. With the mitigation measure implemented, both the proposed project intersection and the roadway, Riverside Drive, will operate at an acceptable LOS. No additional mitigation measures would be necessary. c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? No Impact. The proposed project will not result in a change in air traffic patterns, and therefore will not result in substantial safety risks. In accordance with the City Zoning Code Chapter 17.23.100, building heights are restricted to a maximum height of 32 feet. Project implementation would neither restrict air traffic patterns nor result in any air traffic safety risks. No mitigation measures are necessary. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated The proposed project involves the utilization of an existing entrance gate into the community. According to the traffic analysis completed by Urban Crossroads, the City of Lake Elsinore and the County of Riverside do not have any standard plans regarding the design of a gated entry, however, the County of Riverside staff has previously required use of the Orange County standard plan for stacking analysis. Based on the Private Street Standards provided by Orange County Environmental Management Agency, the minimum storage distance for residential community between the gate and the public street should be 100 feet. Therefore, it is Page 60 •The Planning Center July, 2005 R}COI-04.0nlnit-1 Villas!mare!Study-frnal.dx 3. Environmental Analysis recommended that the project gate be located 100 feet from Riverside Drive to allow adequate queuing lengths for cars to be processed at the gate. Alternately,the access could be restricted to right turn in/out only, allowing the proposed deceleration lane to also provide storage, and the access gate to remain where it is currently shown on the site plan. As just discussed,the project would include the construction of an acceleration and deceleration lane at the main entrance, off of Riverside Dr, in addition to the required emergency access. With the recommended changes to allow for safe stacking, impacts would be mitigated to a less than significant impact, and no additional mitigation measures are necessary. e) Result in inadequate emergency access? No Impact. The proposed project includes implementation of a fire lane just southwest of the main entrance, off of Riverside Dr. This entrance would be locked and inaccessible for residents, however the fire entrance would have break-away gates to provide access for emergency personnel when necessary. No mitigation measures are necessary. f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? No Impact. The proposed project would incorporate a total of 229 parking spaces. Each individual unit will incorporate a two-car garage, providing a total of 102 covered parking spaces. The site plan also includes a total of 127 open spaces. The City of Lake Elsinore's only requirement regarding parking spaces is a required ratio of.25 guest parking spaces per dwelling unit, therefore the number of residential and guest parking spaces that would be provided is more than adequate. No mitigation measures are necessary. g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? No Impact. The proposed project would not conflict or interfere with any adopted plans, programs or policies regarding alternative transportation. The City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, Circulation Element, classifies Riverside Drive as a Class II Bikeway, which provides a restricted right-of-way for the exclusive or semi-exclusive use of bicycles with vehicle parking and cross flows by vehicles and pedestrians permitted. This policy would not conflict with the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are necessary. 3.16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS a) Exceed waste water treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would result in the development of 51 single family residential units. The Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) provides wastewater treatment for the City of Lake Elsinore. According to the Public Safety and Urban Services Element of the Lake Elsinore General Plan, , Medium High Density Residential uses produce 250 gallons per dwelling unit per day of wastewater effluent. As a result, the proposed project would result in the addition of 12,750 gallons per day of effluent flow to the Lake Elsinore Regional Wastewater Reclamation Facility. This amount of effluent flow would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the SARWQCB. Currently,this plant is permitted 100%discharge into Lake Elsinore. No mitigation measures are necessary. Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •Page 61 P:4COL-0¢.OL}InrtiulStady{Ra!f-e VX4,1xaud Stvd)-Je'nalda 3. Environmental Analysis b) Require or result in the construction of new water or waste water treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant Impact. According to the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMMD), the proposed project will neither require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities, nor the expansion of existing facilities. The proposed project site would be adequately served by the treatment facility located at 31315 Chaney Street. No mitigation measures are necessary. c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project includes construction of a storm water drainage system for the proposed site. Water from the project site will drain into two catch basins which will each serve a dual purpose of control and water quality, and from thence flows will continue into the Leach Canyon Flood Control Channel. A SWPPP must be prepared using State Guidelines and kept on-site at all times. Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be utilized during the grading and paving of the site as well as during project operation to minimize the discharge of sediments and non-visible pollutants from the project site. No significant impacts to storm water drainage facilities resulting from the proposed project would occur. No additional mitigation measures beyond those discussed in Hydrology and Water Quality section of this document would be required. d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Less Than Significant Impact. According to the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, there will be sufficient water supplies to provide adequate water to the site. The project site would be connected to the municipal water system, which receives water from several sources, including wells, local surface water within the Elsinore Groundwater Basin, groundwater from the Pauba Formation Aquifer, and supplemental water from the Metropolitan Water District. Total storage capacity within the Elsinore Groundwater Basin was estimated to be 1.4 million acre feet, according to the EVWMD in 2001. According to the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, Medium High Density Residential Development has a daily water consumption factor of 300 gallons per dwelling unit. Based on this consumption factor, the proposed development is projected to create a demand for a total of 15,300 gallons per day. Development of the proposed project would increase water demand within the Elsinore Valley by approximately 0.015 mgd or by less than 0.5% of the total groundwater capacity of the Elsinore Basin. The demand on the existing storage and pump systems would increase with buildout of the site; however, the proposed project would not require expansion of any water supplies and therefore, neither new nor expanded entitlements would be needed to support this project. No mitigation measures are necessary. e) Result in a determination by the waste water treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project site would be connected to the municipal sewer and wastewater system treated at the Regional Wastewater Reclamation Facility.The Facility will have the capacity to treat 8 million gallons of effluent per day. According to the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, Medium High Density Residential has a wastewater generation factor of 250 gallons per dwelling unit per day. Therefore, the proposed 51 unit development would result in approximately 12,750 gallons per day of wastewater effluent, which would not represent a significant proportion of existing flow to the Regional Reclamation Facility such that it would impact the overall wastewater treatment capacity. Page 62 •The Planning Center July, 2005 Pr4COL-04.OE1lnrnalStud}IKixerlake YrUat Initial Stadp fnaLdx 3. Environmental Analysis According to the EVMWD, the proposed project would not require expansion of any wastewater treatment facilities, and therefore, would have no impacts related to wastewater treatment capacity. No mitigation measures are necessary. f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Less Than Significant Impact. The California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) oversees waste disposal for the City of Lake Elsinore.According to the CIWMB, the following landfills were utilized by the City of Lake Elsinore in 2000: Arvin Sanitary Landfill in Kern County, Badlands Disposal Site in Riverside County, El Sobrante Sanitary Landfill in Riverside County, Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill in Orange County, and the Lamb Canyon Disposal Site in Riverside County. The Badlands Disposal site,the Lamb Canyon Disposal Site and the El Sobrante Sanitary Landfill are managed by the Riverside County Waste.Management Department. The El Sobrante Sanitary Landfill, located in Corona, is able to accept 10,000 tons of waste per day (TPD) with a remaining capacity of approximately 3 million cubic yards, and would likely be the waste facility receiving waste generated from the proposed project. The El Sobrante Sanitary Landfill is scheduled to close in 2030.The Badlands Disposal Site, located in Moreno Valley, is able to accept 4,000 TPD with a remaining capacity of approximately 15 million cubic yards. The Badlands Disposal Site is scheduled to close in 2018. The Lamb Canyon Site, located in Beaumont, is able to accept 3,000 TPD with a remaining capacity of approximately 26 million cubic yards. The Lamb Canyon Disposal Site is scheduled to close in 2023. Frank R. Bowerman Landfill, located in Irvine, is currently authorized to receive an annual average of 7,015 (TPD) and is permitted to receive a daily maximum of no more than 8,500 TPD. Frank R. Bowerman is scheduled to close in approximately 2024. The Arvin Sanitary Landfill is able to accept 800 TPD with a remaining capacity of approximately 2 million cubic yards. The Avrin Sanitary Landfill is � scheduled to close in December 2008. The proposed project would not generate significant amounts of solid waste. According to the CIWMB, the total household waste disposal for the City of Lake Elsinore in 2000 was 6,307 tons per year, or approximately 1 pound per resident per day. Implementation of the proposed project would not affect the overall generation of solid waste as 51 residential units would only generate approximately 6 tons per year of solid waste, less than 0.5%of the total waste stream for Lake Elsinore.t2 Furthermore, the City of Lake Elsinore would continue to divert 48% of its solid waste, as specified in the 2002 CIWMB review of diversion rates. Additional landfill space would not be necessitated from implementation of this project alone. No significant impact would occur as a result of the proposed project. No mitigation measures are necessary. g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? No Impact. According to the Public Safety and Urban Services Element of the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, , in 1972, the State Legislature adopted the California Solid Waste Management and Resource Recovery Act, which required each county within the state to prepare a solid waste management plan for all waste generated in the county and disposed of inside or outside of the county. In compliance with the Act, the Riverside County Solid Waste Management Plan was prepared in 1988, and serves as the general guideline for waste management in the county. Therefore,the proposed project would comply with all federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste and source reduction. No solid waste impacts would result from the proposed project. No mitigation measures are necessary. 12 Based on the California Integrated Waste Management Board waste generation rate of 1 pound per resident per day for the City of Lake Elsinore. Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •Page 63 P:XOf-04.0E}lraid Stvdy4Ri..I.&Vdid,Mm,1S,.dy fi—l.da i. 3. Environmental Analysis 3.17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project involves the construction of 51 residential units on a 4.95-acre parcel in the City of Lake Elsinore. The proposed project would be developed on a site that has been previously developed and is currently surrounded with existing residential uses. There are no wildlife habitats, endangered plants or animals, or important examples of California pre-history or history in the vicinity. No mitigation measures are necessary. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. Based on the review of impacts in this Initial Study,the proposed project could result in significant project-related Aesthetic impacts, Hydrology and Water Quality impacts, Land Use and Planning impacts and Noise impacts. However, incorporation of the mitigation measures included in this Initial Study would reduce all of the proposed project's potential impacts to a level that would be considered less than significant. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts. c) Does the project have environmental effects,which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. Based on the evaluation of impacts in this Initial Study, it is not anticipated that the project would result in substantial adverse impacts on human beings, either directly or indirectly, with incorporation of the mitigation measures described herein. Page 64 -P The Planning Center Jay, 2005 PAC0L-04.0Ek[.,1 Surd)lRn 11k,VA.Ma.15tady-f7aLdn 4. Persons and Organizations Consulted and References 4. PERSONS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONSULTED AND REFERENCES 4.1 PREPARERS The Planning Center (Consultant to the City) William Halligan, Esq. Director of Environmental Services/Environmental Counsel Jamie Thomas Environmental Planner Tin Cheung Senior Environmental Scientist Nicole Krause Environmental Planner-Air/Noise 4.2 PERSONS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONSULTED CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE (Lead Agency) Planning Department Linda Miller Associate Planner Public Works Department Chuck Mackey Traffic Engineer CORO Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Cher Quinones Development and Records Coordinator Lake Elsinore Police Department/Sheriff's Station Elizabeth DeCou Crime Prevention Officer Lake Elsinore Unified School District Karen Koski Facilities Secretary Riverside County Library System Mark Smith Library Administrator Riverlake Villas Initial Study City of Lake Elsinore •Page 65. P:%<:OL-04.OFkl-iti-tS',--IRi,--"Vill-i 1wridSrm4-t,-4dk 4. Persons and Organizations Consulted and References 4.3 REFERENCES No. Reference 1. http://www.agmd.gov/business/brochures/zerovoc.html 2. California Integrated Waste Management Board, 2000. 3. City of Lake Elsinore . General Plan. Adopted 1990. (Revised 1995) 4. City of Lake Elsinore. Municipal Code. June 2001 5. http:l/ ".cleanaircounts.org/faQtsheets/FS%20PDF/"Low%20VOC%2oPaint.pdf 6. County of Riverside. General Plan, Elsinore Final Area Plan Map. October 2003. 7. ltpj W .delta-institute.org/pubiications/paints.pdf S. Department of Water Resources, Planning and Local Assistance, California's Groundwater Bulletin 118, Elsinore Groundwater Basin. February 27, 2004. 9, United States Census Bureau,American Factfinder. 2000. 10. Urban Crossroads, Tentative Parcel Map 32674 Traffic Impact Analysis, June 21, 2005. 11. http:llwww.wwaterboards.ca.gov/santaana/rcpermit/rcfactsheet fin.pdf Page 66 •The Planning Center July,2005 P:ICOL-04.OE11aGralSr djgRi-lake Vill,,1.irirlSadj•-fi—IA. APPend/x > APPend/x A, Traffic Study �\62 LA La �.{) ��$ � ! : �§ . �. . JZ ��\ . � . ��C1 : �Jj \/ R,v lake Villas City of Lake Ela9 �:� . l% APPe@d/x . . . \ This page intentionally left blank. . �\ . .� The Planning Center June, 2005 VX�e_wr� :�� 1F - 41'Corpf rate ParkiSUite 36Q lrvirie Cq 92 1931 fax www Jrbanxroa-&:com U JL l` i 2 N 2 2 00 F. 5 ; I J June 21, 2005 LB Y Ms. Jamie Thomas .,. THE PLANNING CENTER 1580 Metro Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Subject: Tentative Parcel Map 32674 Traffic Impact Analysis r Dear Ms. Thomas i INTRODUCTION The firm of Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to submit this letter report summarizing the traffic impact analysis for the proposed Tentative Parcel Map 32674 multi-family residential development. The project site is generally located north of Riverside Drive (State Highway 74), between Lincoln Street and Grand Avenue. Exhibit A illustrates the project site location_ Exhibit B illustrates the project site plan. As shown on Exhibit B, P this project is proposed to include 51 medium-high (condominiumltownhouse) density residential dwelling units. However, per City requirements, this letter report analyzes 4 the impacts, from a traffic standpoint, of the tentative parcel map's maximum density of 89 dwelling units for the 4.9 acre site (18 dwelling units/acre}. According to City of Lake Elsinore Traffic Impact Study Guideline, a traffic impact study is required for new development that generates a minimum of 50 vehicles per hour(total two-way volume) during one of the peak hours. Since this project will only generate a maximum of 46 peak hour trips, which is below 50 peak hour trip threshold, no comprehensive traffic impact study is required. Based on the communication with City staff, this study will focus on the project access intersection operations analysis, signal f warrant analysis, gated access stacking requirement, and on-site circulation recommendations. A-1 Ms. Jamie Thomas THE PLANNING CENTER June 21, 2005 Page 2 r OPERATION ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The traffic operations analysis will be evaluated in accordance with the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) (Transportation Research Board Special Report 209). The HCM defines level of service (LOS) as a qualitative measure in terms of control delay. As described in the HCM, LOS "A" represents free-flow conditions with very low delay, and LOS "F" is indicative of over capacity operations with a condition of excessively high delay. The City's criteria state that LOS "D" or better are generally acceptable for intersections during peak hours. Therefore, any intersection operating at LOS "E" or worse will be considered deficient. The project access intersection will be analyzed using the unsignalized intersection methodology of the HCM. For this intersection, the calculation of level of service is dependent on the occurrence,of gaps occurring in the traffic flow of the major street. Using data collected describing the intersection configuration and traffic volumes at the study area location, the level of service will be calculated. PROJECT TRIP GENERATION, DISTRIBUTION AND VOLUMES This project consists of developing 51 medium-high (condominium/townhouse) density detached residential dwelling units. However, per City requirements, this letter report analyzes the impacts, from a traffic standpoint, of the subject parcel's maximum density of 89 dwelling units for a 4.9 acre site (18 dwelling units/acre). The project will construct a gated access driveway providing access via Riverside Drive (see site plan on Exhibit B). An emergency access is also proposed next to the main entrance and directly connected to Riverside Drive. A-2 Ms. Jamie Thomas THE PLANNING CENTER June 21, 2005 Page 3 Trip Generation Trip generation rates for the project are shown in Table 1. The trip generation rates are based upon data collected by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Both daily and peak hour trip generation for the proposed development are shown in Table 2. The proposed development is expected to generate a total of 522 daily trips with 39 trips occurring during the AM peak hour and 46 trips occurring during the PM peak hour. Trip Distribution Trip distribution represents the directional orientation of traffic to and from the project site. Trip distribution is heavily influenced by the geographical location of the site, the location of commercial, employment and recreational opportunities and the proximity to the regional freeway system. As indicated on Exhibit C, 70% of the project traffic is anticipated to travel north-east, along Riverside Drive, towards the 1-15 Freeway. About 30% of the project traffic is expected to travel south-west of the site, along Riverside Drive, towards Grand Avenue. r.•.: is Project Traffic Volumes Based on the identified project traffic generation and distribution, project AM/PM peak hour volumes at the project access point are calculated and shown on Exhibit D. ADT volumes for the project are also shown on Exhibit D. EXISTING CONDITIONS The project site is currently vacant. Riverside Drive (State Highway 74) at the proposed project site is currently a 2 lane roadway with a center left turn lane. The posted speed limit along Riverside Drive nearby the project site is 40 miles per hour. The 85th f A-3 Ms. Jamie Thomas THE PLANNING CENTER June 21, 2005 Page 4 percentile speed exceeds 40 miles per hour. A new high school has been constructed west of the project site. Riverside Drive along the school site has been recently widened with 2 through lanes in each direction with a center left turn lane. Riverside Drive is proposed to be fully built as a 6-lane Urban Arterial under Currently Adopted General Plan conditions. Exhibit E shows the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Circulation Element and Exhibit F illustrates the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Roadway cross-sections. Existing peak hour volumes along Riverside Drive at the project site have been generated by utilizing eastbound and westbound peak hour volumes from adjacent intersections_ The nearby intersections are: • Lincoln Street (NS)l Riverside Drive (EW) • Grand Avenue (NS) / Riverside Drive (EW) Traffic counts for the two intersections were conducted in May 2005 and the count sheets are included in Attachment "K. Based on the traffic count, a total of 1,344 vehicles currently travel along Riverside Drive at the proposed project site during AM peak hour, with 594 eastbound vehicles and 750 westbound vehicles. During the evening peak hour period, 1,501 vehicles are using Riverside Drive, with 811 eastbound vehicles and 690 westbound vehicles (see Exhibit G). Existing average daily traffic (ADT)west of Lincoln Street was also counted in May 2005 and the count sheets are included in Attachment "A". As indicated on Exhibit G, approximately 22,000 vehicles per day (VPD) travel along Riverside Drive, nearby the project site. A-4 Ms. Jamie Thomas THE PLANNING CENTER June 21, 2005 Page 5 PROJECT ACCESS INTERSECTION INTERIM YEAR (2007) TRAFFIC VOLUMES The project is proposed to be constructed and fully occupied by 2007. Per City requirement, a 2.5% annual background growth has been applied from 2005 to 2007 to account for area-wide growth in the vicinity area. Other development has also been considered for the interim year analysis. Per discussion with City staff, the new high school, located south-west of the project site should be considered as the cumulative project. The new high school is expected to be fully occupied by Fall of 2005. Based on RKJK & Associates, Inc., Lake Elsinore High School'#4 Traffic Impact Study dated December 6, 2000, the high school is anticipated to accommodate 2,700 students, an 11,000 square foot library and a theater with 500 seats. Table 3 indicates the ITE trip generation rates for high school. Table 4 summarizes the peak hour and daily trip generation for the high school development. As indicated on Table 4, the high school development is anticipated to generate 5,527 ` daily trips with 1,253 peak hour trips in the AM peak hour and 493 peak hour trips in the rt PM peak hour. The trip distribution patterns of this cumulative development are depicted on Exhibit H. Based on the identified trip generation and trip distribution, the high school development AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes and daily traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit I. For interim year with project conditions, traffic volumes are generated by adding the project volume to the existing volumes with 2.5% annual growth over 2 years plus the cumulative project volumes, Exhibit J illustrates the AM/PM peak hour volumes and daily traffic volumes for interim year with project conditions. As indicated on Exhibit J, approximately 26,000 daily trips will travel along Riverside Drive during interim year with project conditions. A-5 Ms. Jamie Thomas THE PLANNING CENTER June 21, 2005 Page 6 PROJECT ACCESS INTERIM YEAR SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS Signal warrant analysis has been conducted for the project access intersection for interim year with project conditions. Attachment "B" includes the warrant study based on both ADT estimation method and peak hour volumes method. Both analyses indicate that the project access intersection will not warrant a signal under interim year conditions. PROJECT ACCESS INTERSECTION OPERATION ANALYSIS Table 5 indicates the operational analysis results for the unsignalized project access intersection. As indicated, the project access intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS "E„ and "F") during both AM and PM peak hours based on the existing geometry conditions along Riverside Drive. HCM calculation worksheets for interim year with project traffic conditions are provided in Attachment Table 5 also includes the analysis for the project access intersection under the ultimate future lane geometry with 3 through lanes in each direction along Riverside Drive (see Attachment "C"). The intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service during the AM peak hour but will operate at an acceptable level of service during the PM peak hour. The project access intersection will not warrant a traffic signal under project buildout (2007) conditions. No other physical improvements can provide acceptable level of service (LOS "D") for the minor street left turn movement of the intersection. All movements on the main street (Riverside Drive) experience LOS "D" or better operations. It is therefore recommended that the project access be restricted to right turn in/out and left turn in only. Since Riverside Drive is a state highway, installing a signal may have to follow Caltrans traffic signal warrants criteria. A-6 + Ms. Jamie Thomas THE PLANNING CENTER June 21, 2005 Page 7 GATED ACCESS STACKING REQUIREMENTS Since the project is proposed as a gated community (as illustrated on Exhibit B), the = stacking requirements for the project access point has been analyzed. Although the City of Lake Elsinore and the County of Riverside does not have any standard plans regarding the design of gated entry, the County of Riverside staff has previously required use of the Orange County standard plan for stacking analysis. Based on the Private Street Standards provided by Orange County Environmental Management Agency (as illustrated in Attachment "D"), the minimum storage distance for a residential community between the gate and the public street should be 100 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the project gate be located 100 feet from Riverside Drive to allow adequate queuing lengths for cars to be processed at the gate. Alternately, the access could be restricted to right turn in/out only, allowing the proposed deceleration lane to also provide storage. ON-SITE CIRCULATION RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed project will have gated access to Riverside Drive. An emergency access is also provided next to the main entrance. As illustrated on Exhibit K, the following r.._ circulation recommendations are proposed for the project: On-site traffic signing/striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project site. • Sight distance at the project entrance should be reviewed with respect to Caltrans/County of Riverside sight distance standards at the time of preparation of final grading, landscape and street-improvement plans. • Deceleration lane and acceleration lane should be provided for the project site pursuant to Caltrans/County of Riverside design standards. A-7 Ms. Jamie Thomas THE PLANNING CENTER June 21, 2005 Page 8 • The project access should be restricted to right turn in/out and left turn in only and the access gate should be located about 100 feet from the intersection of the project access at Riverside Drive to allow adequate queuing lengths for cars to be processed at the gate, OR, the project access should be restricted to right turn in/out only and the access gate may remain where it is currently shown on the site plan. • A pedestrian walkway should be constructed along Riverside Drive along the project frontage. • Construct Riverside Drive to its ultimate half-section width as an urban arterial. CLOSING Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to submit the letter report to document the traffic analysis for Tentative Parcel Map 32674. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to give us a call at (949) 660-1994. Respectfully submitted, URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. Carleton Waters, P.E. Min Zhou, P.E. Principal Associate CW:MZ:DM JN:02806-02 Attachments A-8 EXHIBIT A LOCATION MAP i!,Atlillcrgf� SIDE St. 'J °o . a r ,eR.�5T�1Lw�.._ r 'F \ � �.rn? '�f' "�'� �" t } ,�- `/, q� ( �?, Fla���•f� �r 4$ r -_D. N3 fry� •. `' r.�"i.'} �. h,�, .; �N. r(�', ;.}r~ da �`�.r.rr r., (:'ta ' ,:+rf �r.�'.v :. k.., y -�;;^ �. ; �,. !,I{ .,�,..'. -, Ja.•p;,t',r_ni '7 ,7.�,`Ir 'v,�.!$r,: -!`�,.a- t vr,:d--, - ?�...� 3r,'*ri:xt�, ,a. " -, y� •=ry„ r�.r` rY', art* s�, ,���;v c-�U..ur, f,.�rc' �, r, �' ��R;tiq.v'"��a S, E•,-.ram G, pa, q�.�a'- ,t ; ,r•. � ,!.' E;.- v�m�>. '�t�, :.�f r �.•"�'�'m�ri �' ✓'. ,s,.�' �a i(_ � '�'. .�.�,a:��r v �.,��:�-x. �•.. v ...F r ,t y' ? + (�'•. u..^:, :� `-r ��.,cu";`.I7�Y..,v !- .fir". w.� ..r, Imo: 't ,-;�..,�. r ?� �= - ii' �' s�� "a.` •��•.- ;s' �a'�v. :9' ,,;4Y��^r;+„C. ,� kK������. .�, '� '.f� 'L:•. Kt�.. i'�:-< t'. �' 't f, }� yr r: ,,-rs'•.nP- ,.��}� :.l x �.e- ;,:3 ,,,x � 'W�Si.. S<a' ,,.,•'G',."v:,-.Ls ^'•>:�P,M•o� f',. ::e. { tv 4 ..af. 'r4.�• .�C - t'��.� ,�' -,a�, .:.sx,, •aa.af ri �1. r� .,s '��.�':e-d r-7+.,ir P ��,' $ ..sR..:?>T.: e,: !r�- .,,.s�;�p .'��", i� »•',.�S-r�f vc. ,d ''�' `i':-'7'!� .r• Cv ��.' ,Y�,., �. .:; �;�. A. ^•A, �' � � y "- az,.e,<r, �!� et{L _v.:�n +f":.�r'r,s s-�.r ,z :.,�,5 ! ,n,,,G �i-t,.� :d sr� u, �< i `'� x.�v W' y °•i;" s �.y� �' rrfr's .Inr..., o: Y :�!ie yS-ti,.y-e�., .:•"�,�' -r ,.52r: �,:,:� �" r�+e� �C. , ,:�+*: „��`•, �� ,#-• m :rk'... ,r,4a.nr :�h �•.�.Ss Z�r, �� A'S�`�.. �✓, 1' T.p �e;,•:t{^cd•F�c' s :i _' �: ' +-•",t,.§ � ,r '�!. ,eM" ,+uG3c.,v •. :..,vi =r •,, �.4-1 d w' ;��''a v`E -a5btt 'a {-�'� K '� �':�:.3{w xr�x�arb,•�'i�. ��: ��- � 3r �„ s.. ¢�..v, m s+s�'-.�`r.r r' �k >. �,.'�-,H-.,',r� _ rl s, , ��� '-`+�h�k��`{`#,.•4.,:„�,{'�, 9,, -�^ F{.�j•,;� 'e>..�, r. i- �z � ,�;. .w�,��•4-. s e �t'�'r,,W-r'r9'� R�`_. F7 u 4 y.:tra 4. r s�-? >K:+�r Y!�:�r�s r4�,t :l'r'#{7. , ?�.. r �� v .t; '7'"';�j ?C`L+:V a�'�.Y� a •�x'�.7�,.6it�� `F 7 �'k� s«,. Vim ->^�z �,. ., a •`" �;': r '_ 1.{ W; L rn_ 6, r!- ) ,n�,5-.4,.yy:• ` +_-�t�•Y� r +::r°;�., ,? .�(,>�` . ':a, + i •.,,,, � � .�;�r4� sa. �., wa' v,. }r'�; m F�ac�„r"�` fir:, ,,,'�,,p nu'+r ��ye ;.:r=r .,�. rv.a y,.�'L.z.,1•�,.ti a.�", L• y.s,y 'a z� '.r• � ,4 "tp' ? � ar, flC.#, � f.. rr•�L f �� �hj'S'Z.:�i:., � u��'' �?`y k.�.a�ay...'T'"r�"�dd•, ti "E�a - p, � °- .9 �. x�r.�J,;, '� pG+usr I��}Y'' .Y�i-. 'N�. .4'�i x•,?�:- �,r,i:: :� r U � v } 3 U'T � S,` �? 'b ooi '�w'Y' �rtr w�a7r�F r)i ����-+'r"r r'fh 3a ,Y,r•' .. ry ! ".. .ri>• rf •�s '�-a Rr " >,.* -a'Se`-sx. +a .X. r F' `�jr's �•�'" .. :{.. ,f' .�T yqr S . . •.+-'���t.:�,/�:l'.. !S'�k.,,. Ft :2�:�'� '"�'Y5 �" 'x, avC s��• '� � �"-` f'. � d, .-r'�S '�'L y, (,(':'r;f �r� -! (,�,eap� �4�s�Z.r�: r���{ky+7�. r! k.?s; rr:v.�•4�,�,+-c„-�kn.,�$,is _ '.P;+"".�" "--.°'^ -iY� c%a a-. Yy,7 � '����, ,�. ::^r� -,n �..,r-�' 4� j ;�•.s��;h!"3r-arry'� <,r-'1?,+�.� >Y .F.',t ,v .,,*/•�r �,d �'a .•;d"'.a' 4 :+- ;�. -''•W 1,. � �f •" � ,4,�r fa �a xS.h Y t- � a �_ n, � .�e o•f"` �'# n- r�. r� "y �.P ,,v7r�•`r trs qB �W,,�:lp`N=lr �r �-krtiw� :r� rPl v 1,rr i rIgNMA- <>'ti vc r,,._G:. , fi ,''!'-^ _, ` .•v,,p� c,w,y . ,ax.ler 'er ,nry:�3n 1 Fa..,y „m, -r;•, ; f,. , r,v,--,�' C!`g`� � f'? ti5. r� gib+: - .,•w r 'A' 7 I:'�-:c.,� a�.s? >v* y.y��: �F�l, �,1 f,•Yr y ,� •� .� d �, it' �r�:e'uytti%'';�ri o .� rr' a`�`�k'," �" :.z} t:�`�. r rF.f,"•��r Y v F;3s�, -�y. �: „s: ,a i` ,vt A• �.':, S' ,,a• vi / �t_Y,7 c,v/ n".,- :�� � vY- u7 r 'j. ,.�e:r�:n .,.�roir, d. S?.,',+t, ,Ar :1..+ :4. ra ...,z',;.{• -r ,d saran ^.sr'?.3?�,�F d,, _k.;'C lP,^+a asS'�%a _ �',:; 1�' ,:u•r� %} �-�:fir. r£b �C `rs ,..'r. 'y� ,, "'4��' 3. "�.�v F ,.r:! „5..^ '� ,rs -�S !E. �r d �. ��4'r-•r`�,.,�,.fwr'}f 'g.v,,,,k„�.1� c�ri4�'�� - ,t::rd"S � ?. ,'Y ��d���_ LyG d,-f e !t` :-.n SF ..r,..,n�l'y�.',ta ..fit':;: .Y' :K'�' r:l.'' y v r1•nrs,,.:kc�?.,�a:,�Y'�� v.' if'1r`,r�� 6.,�� ' - - � N-r�:4r F�! v w e4'�v�•"h 6 mi,",t. -r ,v. ,'{C. :3 ,,v-�-'.� ,�r- ter;^' _ � 4's}�. i .vk,^v�' •e7"..,�'uV;e' �Au.('..s�1r r �i't dr- M,�•aR�r�.;,;".:f; ,r�>1.".". F!_.. ''�5,,. e ,`. 'cr ,s ..w. ,-a.Ic,L, t &S''�G r.-..s h !1.. z 1 l•". � t_. �c' w'.: t- ,tr r f .h �:• a � yy ,;'�� �, r?� r.4�,..r' �h�-'..va� -r'l.r > w;•: �:. f .:•.n ,.aer' +r",.. ^.t.:. f'rY�l,, w 2: "`u.r4"� -.J: ri- �# r ': �' r. Zr r�. ,e, -a .1 vfl,.a:, h. S �1. >✓3 J,.si, •:1 :,.!�$ 5�.�r .s o- .x a'>r,.t<: e vi ,r. GI '�,•i.�f•,a 14}� !"A a t -'?-+d ti -.r- , T r 4. ;s� ,t.Y.'� ry} .i� �'r•:�e✓"z�•",r. tf r.,'a�- r ± I^_v ,''s� Nils 9 ,�s�. Y"'`.,,v f 'r r:I�,�r,� ''�'. 7 4 ,C. 4r .� rx.,(.F". � •f'" > .����' . � � ;�' n�, ..+;! .,� � r(( ,•w+,"•F�F"a w�Y,. :c/a�€r"�/`r, ,(� 7 ,R :i l�'r u.l�;: � ..z z �i:4 A� n- r- ,zWl 3k;.. - � _ss `�''Xd �rvM� • •c =,' re :/*y N vyar.'. f$�r. � «< r?�+�v 7�''��- rYr�p�V��urF!'�s - '�-,r2'��2�r,��,� _ a {. � t.r ]�,zS�R"'` r s� =7"� '_^5:. ;F � ,f�, �" n�X, k''' �37.<W��r ✓:;: F�6,7 rl�, ?.;cre� r'. `'Vrr �r 1�4tr E f u ��'•� � ti W �6 �dtl�r °x .�' ;i. ^°k$ '`� �•��.+/ 3��i ,A?��t..���,,u� f��r�7, ly r �e3?�4R(ra�`r :?v, d r':i4p -{-\.,4 br'3 „c k _atn. rv,!d. 9v ;,vS,.' � 3 t ,4. y-:>' �..f.; rr� t,. •,9y, •c �::1!('.{y4 hA,. ri l.o- u;. �k::•' 've.,�' G s'r er �,. s j,' n S? I z:'�� `;« ,s r- �',.,� r � ��y�;c. ys. :�5 �°�..� '`t ��•� ,, �� .� �,. u a ar a, : 1��'�,'' ,��,r¢� �N �•.,�',a �- � <�v�: �',9 � .4 :,�; r -"+- a -.z�7. -.SH, v -t^ ds�'aF s" � �,52..�ta' Lk. `� ��-1• ,? ?; � :,w r � ,r �'--� ,d .,,t-- S e' , �,d.�� �� �>. `� �� -,:r�.� �j ��a ��':,,. � v°.f .! ,4"r'ia.. �� �� r�i `L7 .�::•�xn SM�,Y ",r ,YYi��i e^""t x�.a;.," �4.N� 5 :_� > 5 v vg�::,`�W `��hr! ,� �l�.f, .p .r7,".r'vai`�C. $ sC L'•,r. :.S'�v+r "`.5,,1- .��eN c .iA err. Li X.;. �: ,S y, 6.7y�, :Srf�c.'-`* 'S'� ,� :�.. "�5��j'�• 'ti.t:- ni,,..-Y"; err t_, =r•.v rrr r�a4. �_"" .t v- t.i`5.-,l .• -:.rl!4a.'m,r',?!':ot_f i icy', -,. By„y.„d r};• 1 a;s,�.!-k of ,? - ,7...a 1.,. ..v a- r k �.,i1f;Fc - ->3 3 Y s , •,Vf< - yo $ zxk : t. its d3,r : a S z' �1z.••,?',�' la L,� / r y}r nt•�: � `� ;a- rr:• �.vr t-- f?7• e azo-.7§r, ti'"� }'c�rs� `; '�...a- `'.- r ..•1k.»,da �•� •.xx1�.F Y, e6y< -'�`�`4' � �`"a}A .b, r N 1 _Y'k=•.rr t:G�•x„r7�4.:.,.�r5a: r� _{ .r -lfr .,; ,�1,> ';. .�•;. �7 fir', #;��^� 4.'�y;-7„I..a,.::f,.7a,w yx, -.,`x4 a': r-``. i ray".a n.,wC.••ry,SSdN ,�t�„ �r ,r�...,,L, .d�" � ,•,. :F� " r,N a� .f•` {; �,o �,.gel .•�. , ar:Y'-{'cr-,- _ '>t uvYJ !. r n..�� ,.f ,lr d,r�, :ia^;-� !r-T�r .0 4 fy �'y,:e"�n^: ,� ' hg,` � ,.�s u .C?� r�� •� ,G4e yy •vr,' ��,,��% '..,Y ?!. 'fk s t�.r.�i(� to lr ,����r vUEa 7l,5s. ',� y r �r��rk� h'� r>r'..y ����' �,�r,•A,s G� 46 crfh,.�vair- -r�,;5. s"v �' ,i,?T. `4� •'rh r-�11;hCsyv -!+<_rI 7-.,-+;w .erf f ,y��,y��,,��,,•• tr y-. 7 �-,:+cb,4r .ca rrCw�. r' l :�e a a ���';- ,s? •'�,; w�a x..t-n. �:,�.. � ,-�' r d r� st�r sv .Riq 7r,� � < ��. `�`'a.s..-•.. 3 L ��^^ t� ,fix.; Xr s��nF.�� p#,�e�F_ 's'N•+,.:1- � �,r r},.i!^. „ ��� v'. A,,-, �v hJ„ <y-fa. ,; �jr; /�� �Y 3 �`-`„ir .,k��! x kY �, M llry �^..jf•, ���;ip 3/;;W•fir "G xfF , �t.,hn r`�?a',T�'na �'i sr:,�! fi f `"r f ,l�EV�'�' r ( 1 rs�'f�l �:.� I�...r1��"�iN �'��"rGY`�.. ���`,,R,u c S�n;f". "k,ti?:. �r a��-'•1pl T,�sd t-v Q�'�-r� R'r't., 'h',:ii.: r..k,.,xt.», ,J. r,` LEGEND; =INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATION TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 32674 TRAFFIC IMP ANALYSIS Lake Elsinore California-g28Q6;_01 „_ URBAN EXHIBIT B SITE PLAN OQSTow IV.. - eLOCK wAu TRA. T ru 14 96 bo.112 11 10 98 7 $ 5 4 13 3. 2 28 1 e)O9T0.5 TOY WAU uw i l8 �1-- -�eYi`1fAli 1S 6 3;Z " ly 3.5.52' 27SAM 16 20 1Q is � 18 15 t4 12 nfa 21 area it+s urn ffi7{s 7274 e: +A+4 r ' 2 :l� EF _ FF coesr.rry+M �► A' AB A. B A FINISH.irCkP LGGc`tfAti 17' E6Y1lT[4N -- PATIO C YINIT NUMBERAa— ./ M f F!uami11e TYPE _.aft�fs wI r —To srrt��r 38 4 4� ) t� Ar f \ fora u. C 4326 .:. 24 sir J'to � VAU r+ t t 21 44 I i erns I i4� �" \ w o. t 22 it f 3$ 'FF .. sFF. PRNATE ROADWAY �- :� ♦f7iA_`- 'i, ff $ _\1 .. ... "MOW CAL �G CIP 24 LA Aj 25: 1274 — . Y - m 27 � • . A � � u►afi . .a •• _ 2a � • • >�ffLo� � � n9 �_f�,e a' aere�r: eATsN 29ETD siF ,a . w J 3Q > drt$ef { pads oar DRAW -� 31 31 12u:2 ff�t 1 2 fs� 32 N-3^0'58 E, R[tiftf ( c AN fII�N_y 24'19ME CaEl1CY ACCES$ 'k frroe['oeaeAfeo - - 24''Ii1S7E X O �rcn sla t vtlepdsas COWL C aon: .._ OWCK WALL TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 32674 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS , Lake E California-02806:02 URBAN EXHIBIT C PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION I col • � SST 1p • 3' ' 4 SITE r r $ vO� '9L LEGEND; ' 10=PERCENT TO/FROM PROJECT r �• e TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 32674 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ,Lake EI ' California-02806:03 URBAN RAN EXHIBIT D PROJECT ONLY AM & PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES AND AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) !,y S�. roh szz SITE ti cR qyo q` LEGEND: 26/31 =AM/PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 102 =VEHICLES PER DAY. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 32674 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ,Lake EI 'n California-02806:13 URBAN saAN EXHIBIT E CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT a.a ate€ "`� $ $" j ggg cri�a•:AcaD i ! S - l0 'RD �RA4Sr,•1 xx -Ar�'."s�c-..dim S 4 !„Res ;LEGEND: RR i ® EXISTING INTERCHANGES FUTURE INTERCHANGES 3 ? a 'E• m° ® FUTURE INTERCHANGES SOUT1iBOUNP ONLY 9G ° i J e WE t. SPECIAL STUDY:POUCY AREA �r r ry SPHERE OF INFLUENCE `• •_/NNE CITY SOUNOARY FREEWAYNUT s �} �s URBAN ARTERIAL STATE HW Y(6 LANES t 134'R.O.W.) £ Fo•y� a c yv URBAN ARTERIAL(6.LANES;12V R-O.W.) j e tzrste RD ' o i MAJOR(4-LANES;100'R.U.W,1 r��`•.�� SECONDARY(4.LAND!9W R.O.W.) ��, ,s• COLLCCTOR(2-LANES/68'R.O.W.) -u'cuwr n N'rr RD SPECIAL COLLECTOR - if ONE-WAYSECONUARY(2-L.ANESI6Q'RO.ikJ SOURCE:CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 32674 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Lake El ' California-028QS:10 URBAN i EXHIBIT F CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS 120'R.O.W. 7' 2'-�-^-�---�—^i1'�11'�12'�7g�I5EO�N�12'�37' 71' 72' 7 URBAN ARTIR1AL HIGHW Y (&LANE) 120'R_O.W" 96' 72' 6' 12' 17' 12' 7�RABEU)N 12' 11' 12' LANE URBAN ARTERIAL HIGHWAY ENE (r.4ANE) 700'R.o.w_ 80' q 10' 6'�--^15 12'�7fRp IS£O)N�72'�15'�6' 70' I;NE( MAJOR HIGHWAY LANE (4-LAN£) 90'R.O.W. {{ 70' I 10' 6' 71•�31' 14'MEDIAN�11• 11'—}-6' 10' (PAINTED} BIKE BIKE LANE SECONDARY HIGHWAY LANE (4-LANE) 68'R.O.W. 48' 32' I 12' COLLECTOR HIGHWAY SOURCE:CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE (z-LANE) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 32674 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Lake Elsinore California-02806:11 URBAN A-14 EXHIBIT G EXISTING AM & PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES AND AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) s�. F SITE qL LEGEND: E 26/31 =AM/PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 102 =VEHiCLES PER DAY 1 TENTATfVE PARCEL MAP 32b74 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ,Lake Efs"n Cal'rfomia-02806:08 URBAN �Ro�sao EXHIBIT H OTHER DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MAP AND TRIP DISTRIBUTION tic o�y s�. SITE 38 21 1 10 G,Q gtid LEGEND: 9L 10 =PERCENT TO/FROM PROJECT O=HIGH SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT I SOURCE RKJK AND ASSOCIATES,LAKE ELSINORE HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY,DECEMBER 20W TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 32674 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Lake Elsinore California-02806:15 URBAN EXHIBIT CUMULATIVE PROJECT ONLY AM & PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES AND AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) lysT SITE 00 R qNp LEGEND: 26/31 =AWPM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES O =HIGH SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT 102 =VEHICLES PER DAY I : T ENTATIVE FARCE!MAP 32674 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ,lake Eisi o alifomia-02806:17 URBAN �ao�s EXHIBIT J INTERIM YEAR WITH PROJECT AM & PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES AND AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) ltico lysT 522 y`b SITE �.. ^y cp 4L LEGEND: 26/31 =AM/PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 102 =VEHICLES PER DAY TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 32674 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ,Lake El si or California-02806:05 URBAN saaa s r: EXHIBIT K ON-SITE CIRCULATION RECOMMENDATIONS SIGHT DISTANCE AT PROJECT ENTRANCE SHOULD BE REVIEWED WITH RESPECT TO CALTRAN S/COU NTY OF PEDESTRIAN PATH SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED RIVERSIDE SIGHT DISTANCE STANDARDS AT THE TIME OF PREPARATION OF FINAL GRADING,LANDSCAPE ALONG THE PROJECT SITE AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS. nor .wu r" w { TRLTN 14181612 TZ 10 a 865- <:Sm 3 2 1 "W .59' I B 21 20 16 1$: .n 18 15 14 i3 nn ex�, -v T oowr...xax 17 "yt A A B A A 9 A _ Fi11f6f.1 FLOON r aocc riiu - . E1:8YAlmm r r `;C mpg... PATIO 12 / mu"ma TYPO. Y *RAM Wftr {{ fI r0 STREEi i9 23 A Rom_ Ii A I I vcu 42 ; tt C a�J3 1 a 20 24 1 ~ J !10 q+i IrAu ;.HE PROJECT ACCESS GATE ( f SHOULD BE RESTRICTED TO z 21 A a R� 44 mA SIGHT TURN IN/OUT AND LEFTg I e I URN IN ONLY AND THE ,„,, 4 22 � Amp" w'^`°A/5 C[ESS GATE SHOULD BE R 39 a�+ LOCATED ABOUT 100 FEET }` h 28 ; #, m�;As FROM THE INTERSECTION OF 23 as p �s0 45 I HE PROJECT ACCESS AT c y 4] B A '.IVERSIDE DRIVE TO ALLOW 24 ra ! sr� K'"4a ¢� L, 3 ADEQUATE QUEUING LENGTHS L :AI 4 FOR CARS TO BE PROCESSED 25 $6.R>,, 40 j THE GATE;OR THE PROJECT , l A o 26 r 7 psi -z LL I ;,CCESS SHOULD BE RESTRICTEC 27 A f0 RIGHT TURN IN/OUT AND 1274— f THE ACCESS GATE MAY BE 27 miriD e a 'EMAIN WHERE IT IS sa 34"a „ URRENTLY SHOWN. 28 7 'a1 1t s: ° + t w Jf A 1ti „ ao " a4low " s1260.6 �T�{ti.AtiR- N 37`QD'S8 £ 39✓S4' I Q HI°"r rurr6- Mtr � a sa werticx�c sg OEDICATE'O7Jl - aoa[rAu 6 RIVER� R11rE«` 6..• CONTRUCT RIVERSIDE DRIVE TO ITS ULTIMATE DECELERATION LANE AND ACELERATION LANE HALF SECTION WIDTH AS AN URBAN ARTERIAL SHOULD BE PROVIDED WITH RESPECT TO CALTRANS/COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARDS. ON-SITE TRAFFIC SIGNING/STRIPING SHOULD BE CONTINUE MONITORING THE TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT IMPLEMENTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH DETAILED THE PROJECT ACCESS INTERSECTION AND SIGNALIZE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE PROJECT SITE. THE INTERSECTION WHEN WARRANTED. -TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 32674 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS,Lake Elsinore California-02806:19 URBAN Cap5 AN TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION RATES' PEAK HOUR TRIP RATES ITE AM PM LAND USE CODE QUANTI UNITSZ [5j OUT IN OUT DAILY Medium High Density(Condo) 1 230 1 89 1 DU 1 0.07 1 0.37 0.35 0.17 5.86 1 Source: ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers)Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, 2003. 2 DU= Dwelling Unit U:1UcJobsl 028001028061Excell[02806-02.xls]T 1 A-20 TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY PEAK HOUR AM PM LAND USE QUANTITY UNITS' IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL DAILY Medium High Density(condo) 89 DU 6 33 39 31 15 46 522 S f't x f^' DU=dwelling unit - 2 The 89-unit is calcuated based on the maximum density allowed for MHD(18 du/acre)and the 4.9 acre project site. U:WcJohsl_028001028061FxceI\j02806-02.xlslT 2 A-21 TABLE 3 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TRIP GENERATION RATS' PEAK HOUR AM PM LAND USE I ITE CODEIQUANTIJ UNITS2 IN OUT TOTAL IN I OUT TOTAL DAILY Hi h School 530 2,700 STU 0.32 0.14 0,46 0.06 0.09 0.15 1.79 11-ibraly 590 11 TSF 0.76 0.3 1.06 3.4 3.69 7.09 54 Theatre 441 1 500 1 Seats I Nom Nom Nom 0.01 1 0.01 1 0.02 1 0.2 I Source:l7K.IK and Associates,Lake Elsinore High S&ml Traffic Impact Study,December 2000 2 STU=Students,TSF=Thousand Square FM - 3 Nom=Nominal U:1UcJobsl_028001028061ExceK[TRI PGEN xfs]Cumu A-22 TABLE 4 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS' TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY f° PEAK HOUR AM PM ND USE QUANTI UNITS IN OUT TOTAL 1N OUT TOTAL DAILY High School 2,700 STU 864 378 1,242 162 243 405 4,833 Library 590 TSF 8 3 11 37 41 78 594 Theatre 441 Seats Noma Noma Nom' 5 5 10 100 TOTAL 872 381 1,253 204 289 493 5,527 y.r t 3 z : 1 Source:RKJK and Associates,Lake Elsinore High School Traffic Impact Study,December 2000 2 STU =Students,TSF=Thousand Square Feet 3 Nom=Nominal U:1UcJobsl_028001028061Excell[02806-02.xls]T 4 A-23 i } TABLE 5 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY FOR INTERIM YEAR WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES' LEVEL OF NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- Delay2(SEC) SERVICE TRAFFIC BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND INTERSECTION CONTROL L r R Ll T R Ll T1 RI L T R AM I PM AM PM Riverside Dr.(NS)at: Project Access(EW) -With EAasting Geometry CSS 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 --4 1 46.3 F E -With Future Geomte CSS 1 3 0 0 3 1 1 0 1 o o o 45.8 25.2 E D ' When a right turn is designated,the lane can either be striped or unstriped.To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right 2 Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software: Traffa,Version 7.7 R3(2005).Per the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual,overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control,the delay and level of service for worst individual movement(or movements sharing a single lane)are shown, ' CSS=Cross Street Stop -` =Delay High,Intersection Unstable,Level of Service'F". U:\UcJobsl 02800\028o6\ExceRI02806-02.xls]T 5 A-24 t .ry. k ATTACHMENT A TRAFFIC COUNT WORKSHEETS x�r Lill ELL4: r ` r- A-25 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic-See Note 2) Major St: Riverside Dr. Minor St. Project Access Year= 2007 WP Volume = 25,794 Lanes= 3 Volume = 260 Lanes= 1 (one-way) i I URBAN RURAL XX Minimum Requirements EADT r-r t 1. Minimum Vehicular Vehicles per day Vehicles per day on major street on higher volume Satisfied Not Satisfied (both approaches) minor-street approach XX (one direction only) Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach. Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural 1 1 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680 2 + 25,794 1 260 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680 2 + 2+ 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 1 2 + 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 j I . 2. Interruption of Continuous Vehicles per day Vehicles per day i traffic on major street on higher volume Satisfied Not Satisfied (both approaches) minor-street approach XX (one direction only) Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach. Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural 1 1 12,000 8,400 1,200 850 2 + 25,794 1 260 14,400 10,080 1,200 850 2 + 2 + 14,000 10,080 1,600 1,120 1 2 + 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120 3. Combination 2 Warrants 2 Warrants Satisfied Not Satisfied XX _ No one warrant satisfied but following warrants fulfilled 80%or more.. 15% 31% 1 2 NOTES: 1. To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. A-32 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT (Rural Areas) EXISTING CONDITIONS (AM Peak Hour) Major Street Name= Riverside Dr. (NS) Total of Both Approaches (VPH)_ 1970 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street= 2 Minor Street Name = Project Access (EW) High Volume Approach (VPH)= 33 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street= 1 SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED f . = - 500 x a t :. > s 400 o L CL Q. m 300 i' E O t 2 200 m L c 100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -3 - - 0 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Major Street-Total of Both Approaches -VPH ---0-1 Lane(Major)&1 Lane(Minor) - S 2+Lanes(Major)& 1 Lane(Minor)OR 1 Lane(Major)&2+Lanes(Minor) ..�2+Lanes(Major)&2+Lanes(Minor) F �-Major Street Approaches aK - Minor Street Approaches **NOTE: 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. Urban Crossroads RiversideDr ProjectAccess AM (RURAL AREA WARRANT) 6f21f2005 A-33 i PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT (Rural Areas) EXISTING CONDITIONS (PM Peak Hour) Major Street Name= Riverside Dr. (NS) Total of Both Approaches (VPH)= 1825 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street= 2 Minor Street Name= Project Access (EW) High Volume Approach (VPH)= 16 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street= 1 SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED 500 2 d s 400 0 m 0 Q. C. 300 E Z 0 L 200 id Q7 a+ 0 100 G_ 1 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Major Street-Total of Both Approaches -VPH —^a-1 Lane(Major)& 1 Lane(Minor) 6 2+Lanes(Major)& 1 Lane(Minor)OR 1 Lane(Major)&2+Lanes(Minor) ---0-2+Lanes(Major)&2+Lanes(Minor) ---X -Major Street Approaches - -)K - Minor Street Approaches *"NOTE: 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. Urban Crossroads RiversideDr ProjectAccess PM (RURAL AREA WARRANT) 6/21/2005 A-34 F' j'. ATTACHMENT C s . INTERIM YEAR WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION ANALYSIS i A-35 MITIGS - AM with Exist Geo Tue Jun 21, 2005 15:07:09 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JN: 2806 Tentative Tract 32674 Traffic Impact Analysis 2007 With Project With Existing Geometry -------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 RCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Riverside Dr. (NS)/Project Access (EW) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 1.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[ 62.2j Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement- L - T - R L - T R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ ---------------I1---------------11---------------11---------------1 Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ' ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------i Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 594 0 0 750 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj : 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 i.os 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 624 0 0 788 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 2 168 0 0 384 4 23 0 10 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 2 792 0 0 1172 4 23 0 10 0 0 0 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 2 792 0 0 1172 4 23 0 10 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol. : 2 792 0 0 1172 4 23 0 10 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------� Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1176 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1967 xxxx 1172 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 601 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 70 xxxx 237 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 601 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 70 xxxx 237 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.33 xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------I---------------11 ---------------11---------------11---------------I bevel Of Service Module: Queue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.2 xxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 11.o xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 80.2 xxxx 20.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: B * * * * * F * C Movement: LT -- LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 62.2 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * F Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE A-36 MITIGS - PM with Exist Geo Tue Jun 21, 2005 15:07:20 Page 1-1 ------------------- JN: 2806 Tentative Tract 32674 Traffic Impact Analysis 2007 With Project With Existing Geometry --------------------------- Level of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection ##3 Riverside Dr_ (NS)/Project Access (EW) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 0.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: E( 36.21 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ? Movement- L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- --------------- -- --- + Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes- 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0;. ------------ --------------- ---- ------ ; _ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 811 0 0 690 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � ,• Growth Adj: 1.05 i.o5 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 852 0 0 725 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 9 127 0 0 90 22 11 0 5 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Put: 9 979 0 0 815 22 11 0 5 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 a PHF Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 9 932 0 0 776 21 11 0 5 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol. : 9 932 0 0 776 21 11 0 5 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------ ---------------Il--------------- Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 797 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1725 xxxx 776 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 834 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 99 xxxx 401 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 834 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 98 xxxx 401 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.11 xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------ --------------- ----------- Level Of Service Module: Queue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.4 xxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 9.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 46.3 xxxx 14.1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * E * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx r • Shared LOS: * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 36.2 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * E r . ' Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE i A-37 MITIG8 - AM Tue Jun 21, 2005 15:06:37 Page 1-1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JN: 02806 Tentative Tract 32674 Traffic Impact Analysis 2007 With Project Level Of Service Computation Report - - 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) *x*x*xxxxxxxxxxx*xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx,r,r**x*xx*xxx*,r*#xxxxx***x*x,rx*xxxxxx** Intersection #3 Riverside Dr. (NS)/Project Access (EW) xxx*xx*xxxxxxxxxxx*x*xxxxxxxxxx*xxxx*****xxxxxxxxxxx*xxx****xxxxxxx*xxxxxxx***xx Average Delay (sec/veh) : 0.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: E[ 35.31 xxxx*xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,r*xx*x**xxxx**xxxxxxxxxxxx:,r*xx*x***x*x*x*x*x: Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I--------------- � �-------__------� �---------------fj--------------- � Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 594 0 0 750 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj : 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 624 0 0 788 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 2 168 0 0 384 4 23 0 10 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 2 792 0 0 1172 4 23 0 10 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95. 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 2 833 0 0 1233 4 24 0 11 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol. : 2 833 0 0 1233 4 24 0 11 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------ ---------------11--------------- --------------- ---------------� Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1237 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1515 xxxx 411 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 570 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 112 xxxx 596 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 570 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 112 YYYY 596 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.22 xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------I---------------11--------------- --------------- ---------------� Level Of Service Module: Queue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.8 xxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 11.3 xxxx Xxxxx xxxxx Xxxx xxxxx 45.8 xxxx 11.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: B * * * x * E x B * x Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. . xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx YYYYY xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * x * * * x * * x ApproachDel: xxxxx xxxxxx 35.3 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * x E x Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE A-38 I '. MITIG8 - PM Tue Jun 21, 2005 15:06:45 page 1-1 -JN: 02806 Tentative Tract 32674 Traffic Impact Analysis 2007 With Project - Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Riverside Dr. (NS)/Project Access (EW) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: C( 20.41 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R ------------f--------------- --------------- ---------------if---------------f Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 r : - ----------f---.------------ff---------------ff---------------ff---------------f Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 811 0 0 690 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 I.0O 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 852 0 0 725 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 9 127 0 0 90 22 11 0 5 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 9 979 0 0 815 22 11 0 5 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- PHF Adj: 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 9 981 0 0 817 22 12 0 5 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol. : 9 981 0 0 817 22 12 0 5 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxx= xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 5•8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx .xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------11--------------- ---------------ff---------------f i:.J Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 839 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1162 xxxx 272 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 805 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 193 xxxx 732 xxxx xxxx =xxxx E Move Cap. : 805 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 190 xxxx 732 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.06 xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------ I ---------------ff---------------: :_ Level Of Service Module: ' Queue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 9.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 25.2 xxxx 10.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * D * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx =xxxx xxxx =xxxx =xxxx xxxx Xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx= xxxxx xxxx xxxx= Shared LOS: * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx ==xxxx 20.4 3otxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C Traffix 7.7.1115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE A-39 ATTACHMENT D PRIVATE STREET ACCESS GATE STORAGE STANDARDS A-40 61 NOTES: 1. Private streets shall be permitted only as described in the Or County Subdivision Code, subject to review and approval by the Engineer, the Subdivision Committee, and the Planning Commission. 2. Private streets shall provide a paved travel way in conformance with Std. Plan 1107. Walkways shall be provided on ail private streets in conformance W" with Std. Plans 1107 and 1205 unless an alternate pedestrian circulation system is provided meeting the approval of the Engineer. 3. Required pavement structural section shall be determined by the Engineer. 4. Entryways to private tracts shall be designed to emphasize their private 1 status. Textured concrete or wide flare driveways, guard gates or other access controls shall be required for private tracts. Entry gates shall be set back from the near curb line of any public street to provide a minimum 100 feet of storage for entering vehicles to stock without interfering with through traffic. Minimum design criteria and required features for guard gates are shown below: =35105'48" I 1 ° D (See Notes) I 20' I - R"-�� R=100, E l ' E w (GATE ,n ``'I ' r E U) NI 30 ---- — ----;---�;,- ---- UI MIN. I a 0 R,2S, E , E - i E °=22037'11"' i ` 50.00' - 31.62 E E E GUARD GATE NOTES: 1. D=1' Per Dwelling Unit_ Served, 100' Minimum (Multiple Lanes may be used to satisfy storage distance requirement.) ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY STD. PLAN Approved �L C R.Nelson.Dlr for or Public works '7 )opted: Res. 77-92 Revised- Res. 78-791 110Il PRIVATE STREET_ STANDARDS SHT. 3 OF 4 A-41 i . ....r � i. �` ,' . � � 'i_ � : �_..� f i '. � �....1 i �L..i �.:! ;, �. '•�_ _� s :::+ �1 UU i � 1 j f v.�1 '� � � , � ,� 1' {� J -��� \\ l . \/7 A pendix 2 Appendix B. Air Quality Study - '� } \»{ { . \< l . k»; ) '§ ( River lake Villas City of Lake Elsinore { : P o"4_ _,I',&,aws.fr � � . Appendix This page intentionally left blank. The Planning Center June, 2005 P:1COL-04.01itlnitinl.Vady�Rnnrblr Ville,I.Wd Study-f—U r Page: 1 06/23/2005 11:36 Am URBEMIS 2002 For Windows 8-7.0 File Name: C:\Lake Elsinore\Lake Elsinore_5acre.urb Project Name. Elsinore Sacre Project Location: South Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area) On-Road Motor Vehicle Emissions Based on F14FAC2002 version 2.2 SUMMARY REPORT (Pounds/Day Sumer) CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES PM10 PM10 PM10 2005 ROO NOx co S02 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST TOTALS (lbs/day,urmitigated) 3.65 24.85 29.27 0.00 51.09 1.09 50.00 PM10 PM10 PM10 2006 ROG NOx CO S02 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST TOTALS (lbs/day,unmitigated) 3.64 24.09 29.54 0.00 1.02 1-00 0.02 PM10 PM10 PM10 2007 ROG NOx CO S02 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST TOTALS (lbs/day,urimitigdted) 70.59 56.29 73.34 0.00 2.14 2.09 0.05 AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 TOTALS (lbs/day,unmitigated) 3.47 0.39 0-94 0.00 0.00 OPERATIONAL (VEHICLE) EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 TOTALS (lbs/day.uranitigated) 5.40 5.79 64.67 0.06 5.30 SUM OF AREA AND OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 TOTALS (lbs/day,unmitigated) 8.87 6.18 65.61 0.06 5.31 Page: 2 06/23/2005 11:36 AM URBEHIS 2002 For Windows 8.7.0 File Name: C:\Lake Elsinore\Lake Elsinore-5acre.urb Project Name: Elsinore-5acre Project Location: South Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area) On-Road Motor Vehicle Emissions Based on EMFAC2002 version 2.2 SUMMARY REPORT (Pounds/Day Winter) CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES z PM10 PM10 PM10 2005 ROG NOx co S02 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST TOTALS (lbs/day,unrnitigated) 3.65 24-85 29.27 0.00 51.09 1.09 50.00 B-1 PM10 PM10 PM10 *** 2006 *** ROG NOx CO S02 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST TOTALS (ibs/day,unmitigated) 3.64 24.09 29.54 0.00 1.02 1.00 0.02 PM10 PM10 PM10 *** 2007 *** ROG NOx CO S02 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST TOTALS (ibs/day,unmitigated) 70.59 56.29 73.34 0.00 2.14 2.09 0.05 AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 TOTALS (lbs/day,unmitigated) 3.34 0.38 0.16 0.00 0.00 OPERATIONAL (VEHICLE) EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 TOTALS (lbs/day,unmitigated) 5.12 8.44 61.20 0.05 5.30 SUM OF AREA AND OPERATIONAL EMISSION ESTIMATES ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 TOTALS (lbs/day,unmitigated) 8.47 8.82 61.36 0.05 5.31 Page: 3 06/23/2005 11:36 AM URBEMIS 2002 For Windows 8.7.0 File Name: C:\Lake Elsinore\Lake Elsinore_5acre.urb Project Name: Elsinore_5acre Project Location: South Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area) On-Road Motor Vehicle Emissions Based on EMFAC2002 version 2.2. DETAIL REPORT (Pounds/Day - Winter) Construction Start Month and Year: September, 2005 Construction Duration: 18 Total Land Use Area to be Developed: 5 acres Maximum Acreage Disturbed Per Day: 5 acres Single Family Units: 0 Multi-Family Unitst 51 Retail/Office/Institutional/Industrial Square Footage: 0 CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES UNMITIGATED (lbs/day) PM10 PM10 PM10 Source ROG NOx CO S02 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST *** 2005*** Phase 1 - Demolition Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 0.00 - 0.00 Off-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 On-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Phase 2 - Site Grading Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 50.00 - 50.00 Off-Road Diesel 2.41 16.61 19.42 - 0.75 0.75 0.00 On-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker Trips 0.04 0.05 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 2.45 16.66 20.36 0.00 50.75 0.75 50.00 Phase 3 - Building Construction Bldg Const Off-Road Diesel 3.52 24.78 27.79 •- 1.09 1.09 0.00 B-2 Bldg Const Worker Trips 0.12 0.07 1.48 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 Arch Coatings Off-Gas . 0.00 - - - _ Arch Coatings Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Off-Gas 0.00 - Asphalt Off-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt On-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 3.65 24.85 29.27 0.00 1.11 1.09 0.02 z ;. Max lbs/day all phases 3.65 24.85 29.27 0.00 51.09 1.09 50.00 **" 2006*** Phase 1 - Demolition Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 0.00 - 0.00 Off-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 On-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _ Phase 2 - Site Grading Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 0.00 - 0.00 x ;• Off-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 ° On-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 r: Maximum lbs/day 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Phase 3 - Building Construction Bldg Const Off-Road Diesel 3.52 24.02 28.14 - 1.00 1.00 0.00 � . Bldg Const Worker Trips 0.12 0.07 1.40 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 Arch Coatings Off-Gas 0.00 - - Arch Coatings Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Off-Gas 0.00 - - - _ Asphalt off-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt On-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0-00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 3.64 24.09 29.54 0.00 1.02 1.00 0.02 Max lbs/day all phases 3.64 24.09 29.54 0.00 1.02 1.00 0.02 ww* 2007*** Page: 4 06/23/2005 11:36 AM Phase 2 - Demolition Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 0.00 - 0.00 Off-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 On-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Phase 2 - Site Grading Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 0.00 - 0.00 Off-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 t On-Road Diesel 0.00 o_oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Phase 3 Building Construction Bldg Const Off-Road Diesel 3.52 23.25 28.50 - 0.89 0.00 Bldg Const Worker Trips 0.11 0.06 1.32 0.00 0.02 0.0.89 89 0.00 Arch Coatings Off-Gas 61.52 - - Arch Coatings Worker Trips 0.11 0.06 1.32 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 Asphalt Off-Gas 0.22 - - Asphalt Off-Road Diesel 5.04 32.00 41.66 - 1.18 1.18 0.00 Asphalt On-Road Diesel 0.05 0.90 0.17 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 B-3 Asphalt Worker Trips 0.03 0.02 0.36 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 Maximum lbs/day 70.59 56.29 73.34 0.00 2.14 2.09 0.05 Max lbs/day all phases 70.59 56.29 73.34 0.00 2.14 2.09 0.05 Phase 1 - Demolition Assumptions: Phase Turned OFF Phase 2 - Site Grading Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 2: Sep '05 Phase 2 Duration: 2 months On-Road Truck Travel (VMT): 0 Off-Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Graders 174 0.575 8.0 1 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 0.465 8.0 Phase 3 - Building Construction Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 3: Nov 105 Phase 3 Duration: 16 months Start Month/Year for SubPhase Building: Nov 105 SubPhase Building Duration: 16 months Off-Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Cranes 190 0.430 8.0 1 Rough Terrain Forklifts 94 0.475 8.0 2 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 0.465 8.0 Start Month/Year for SubPhase Architectural Coatings: Jan 107 SubPhase Architectural Coatings Duration: 1.6 months Start Month/Year for SubPhase Asphalt: Feb 107 SubPhase Asphalt Duration: 0.8 months Acres to be Paved: 1.5 Off-Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Graders 174 0.575 8_0 1 Pavers 132 0.590 8.0 1 Paving Equipment 111 0.530 8.0 1 Rollers 114 0.430 8.0 Page: 5 06/23/2005 11:36 AM AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES (winter Pounds per Day, Unmitigated) Source ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 Natural Gas 0.03 0.38 0.16 0 0.00 Hearth 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Landscaping - No winter emissions Consumer Prdcts 2.50 - - - - Architectural Coatings 0.82 - - - - TOTALS(lbs/day,unmitigated) 3.34 0.38 0.16 0.00 0.00 Page: 6 06/23/2005 11:36 AM UNMITIGATED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 Condo/townhouse general 5.12 2.44 61.20 0.05 5.30 TOTAL EMISSIONS (lbs/day) 5.12 8.44 61.20 0.05 5.30 B-4 Does not include correction for passby trips. Does not include double counting adjustment for internal trips. OPERATIONAL (Vehicle) EMISSION ESTIMATES Analysis Year; 2006 Temperature (F); 50 Season: Winter EMFAC Version: EMFAC2002 (9/2002) Summary of Land Uses: No. Total r Unit Type Acreage Trip Rate Units Trips Condo/townhouse general 3-19 10.24 trips/dwelling unit 51.00 522.24 jr Sum of Total Trips 522.24 Total Vehicle Miles Traveled 3,494.05 Vehicle Assumptions: Fleet Mix: Vehicle Type Percent Type Non-Catalyst Catalyst Diesel Light Auto 55.60 2.20 97.30 0.50 Light Truck < 3,750 lbs 15.10 4-00 93-40 2.60 Light Truck 3,751- 5,750 15.90 1.90 96.90 1.20 Med Truck 5,751- 8,500 7.00 1.40 95.70 2.90 Lite-Heavy 8,501-10,000 1.10 0.00 81.80 18.20 Lite-Heavy 10,001-14,000 0.30 0.00 66-70 33.30 Med-Heavy 14,001-33,000 1.00 10.00 20-00 70.00 Heavy-Heavy 33,001-60,000 0.90 0.00 11.10 88.90 Line Haul > 60,000 lbs 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 Urban Bus 0.10 0.00 0.00 100.00 Motorcycle 1.70 82.40 17-60 0.00 School Bus 0.10 0.00 0.00 100.00 Motor Home 1.20 0.00 91.70 8.30 Travel Conditions Residential Commercial Home- Home- Home- Work Shop Other Commute Non-Work Customer Urban Trip Length (miles) 11.5 4.9 6.0 10.3 5.5 5.5 Rural Trip Length (miles) 11.5 4.9 6.0 10.3 5.5 5.5 Trip Speeds (mph) 35.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40-0 % of Trips Residential 20.0 37.0 43.0 Page: 7 06/23/2005 11:36 Am Changes made to the default values for Land Use Trip Percentages The Trip Rate and/or Acreage values for Condominium/townhouse general have changed from the defaults 6.9/3.19 to 10.24/3.19 Changes made to the default values for Construction Changes made to the default values for Area The hearth option switch changed from on to off. Changes made to the default values for operations The operational emission Year changed from 2005 to 2006. B-5 Page: 8 06/23/2005 11:36 AM URBEMIS 2002 For Windows 8.7.0 File Name: C:\Lake Elsinore\Lake Elsinore_5acre.urb Project Name: Elsinore_5acre Project Location: South Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area) On-Road Motor Vehicle Emissions Based on EMFAC2002 version 2.2 DETAIL REPORT (Pounds/Day - Summer) Construction Start Month and Year: September, 2005 Construction Duration: 18 Total Land Use Area to be Developed: 5 acres Maximum Acreage Disturbed Per Day: 5 acres Single Family Units: 0 Multi-Family Units: 51 Retail/Office/Institutional/Industrial Square Footage: 0 CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES UNMITIGATED (lbs/day) PM10 PM10 PM10 Source ROO NOx CO S02 TOTAL EXHAUST DUST *** 2005*** Phase 1 - Demolition Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 0.00 - 0.00 Off-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 On-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Phase 2 - Site Grading Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 50.00 - 50.00 Off-Road Diesel 2.41 16.61 19.42 - 0.75 0.75 0.00 On-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker Trips 0.04 0.05 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 2.45 16.66 20.36 0.00 50.75 0.75 50.00 Phase 3 - Building Construction Bldg Const Off-Road Diesel 3.52 24.78 27.79 - 1.09 1.09 0.00 Bldg Const Worker Trips 0.12 0.07 1.48 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 Arch Coatings Off-Gas 0.00 - - - - - - Arch Coatings Worker Trips 0.00- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Off-Gas 0.00 - - - - - - Asphalt Off-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt On-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 3.65 24.85 29.27 0.00 1.11 1.09 0.02 Max lbs/day all phases 3.65 24.85 29.27 0.00 51.09 1.09 50.00 *** 2006*** Phase 1 - Demolition Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 0.00 - 0.00 Off-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 On-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Phase 2 - Site Grading Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 0.00 - 0.00 Off-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0-00 0.00 0.00 On-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Phase 3 - Building Construction B-6 Bldg Const Off-Road Diesel 3.52 24.02 28.14 - 1.00 1.00 0.00 Bldg Const Worker Trips 0.12 0.07 1.40 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 Arch Coatings Off-Gas 0.00 - - - _ - Arch Coatings Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Off-Gas 0.00 - - - _ Asphalt Off-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt On-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asphalt Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 3.64 24.09 29.54 0.00 1.02 1.00 0.02 Max lbs/day all phases 3.64 24.09 29.54 o.00 1.02 1.00 0.02 2007*** Page: 9 06/23/2005 11:36 AM Phase 1 - Demolition Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 0.00 - 0.00 .. Off-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 4.00 0.00 0.00 On-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Phase 2 - Site Grading Emissions Fugitive Dust - - - - 0.00 - 0.00 Off-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 On-Road Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maximum lbs/day 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Phase 3 - Building Construction Bldg Const off-Road Diesel 3.52 23.25 28.50 - 0.89 0.89 0.00 Bldg Const Worker Trips 0.11 0.06 1.32 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 Arch Coatings Off-Gas 61.52 - - - _ Arch Coatings Worker Trips 0.11 0.06 1.32 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 } Asphalt Off-Gas 0.22 - - _ Asphalt Off-Road Diesel 5.04 32.00 41.66 - 1.18 1.18 0.00 Asphalt On-Road Diesel 0.05 0.90 0.17 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 Asphalt Worker Trips 0.03 0.02 0.36 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 Maximum lbs/day 70.59 56.29 73.34 0.00 2.14 2.09 0.05 Max lbs/day all phases 70.59 56.29 73.34 0.00 2.14 2..09 0.05 i Phase 1 - Demolition Assumptions: Phase Turned OFF Phase 2 - Site Grading Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 2: Sep 105 Phase 2 Duration: 2 months On-Road Truck Travel (VMT) : 0 Off-Road Equipment NO Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Graders 174 0.575 8.0 1 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 0.465 8.0 Phase 3 - Building Construction Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 3: Nov 105 Phase 3 Duration: 16 months Start Month/Year for SubPhase Building: Nov 'QS SubPhase Building Duration: 16 months Off-Road Equipment NO. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Cranes 190 0.430 8.0 1 Rough Terrain Forklifts 94 0.475 8.0 2 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes 79 0_465 8.0 B-7 Start Month/Year for SubPhase Architectural Coatings: Jan 107 SubPhase Architectural Coatings Duration: 1.6 months Start Month/Year for SubPhase Asphalt: Feb 107 SubPhase Asphalt Duration: 0.8 months Acres to be Paved: 1.5 off-Road Equipment No. Type Horsepower Load Factor Hours/Day 1 Graders 174 0.575 8.0 1 Pavers 132 0.590 8.0 1 Paving Equipment ill 0.530 8.0 1 Rollers 114 0.430 8.0 Page: 10 06/23/2005 11:36 AM AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES (Summer Pounds per Day, Unmitigated) Source ROG NOx c0 S02 PM10 Natural Gas 0.03 0.38 0.16 0 0.00 Hearth - No summer emissions Landscaping 0.12 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.00 Consumer Prdcts 2.50 - - - - Architectural Coatings 0.82 - - - - TOTALS(lbs/day,unmitigated) 3.47 0.39 0.94 0.00 0.00 Page: 11 06/23/2005 11:36 AM UNMITIGATED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 Condo/townhouse general 5.40 5.79 64.67 0.06 5.30 TOTAL EMISSIONS (lbs/day) 5.40 5.79 64.67 0.06 5.30 Does not include correction for passby trips. Does not include double counting adjustment for internal trips. OPERATIONAL (Vehicle) EMISSION ESTIMATES Analysis Year: 2006 Temperature (F) : 90 Season: Summer EMFAC Version: EMFAC2002 (9/2002) Summary of Land Uses: No. Total Unit Type Acreage Trip Rate Units Trips Condo/townhouse general 3.19 10.24 trips/dwelling unit 51.00 522.24 Sum of Total Trips 522.24 Total Vehicle Miles Traveled 3,494.05 Vehicle Assumptions: Fleet Mix: Vehicle Type Percent Type Non-Catalyst Catalyst Diesel Light Auto 55.60 2.20 97.30 0.50 Light Truck < 3,750 lbs 15.10 4.00 93.40 2.60 Light Truck 3,751- 5,750 15.90 1.90 96.90 1.20 B-8 Med Truck 5,751- 8,500 7.00 1.40 95.70 2.90 Lite-Heavy 81501-10,000 1-10 0.00 81.80 18.20 Lite-Heavy 10,001-14,000 0.30 0.00 66.70 33.30 Med-Heavy 14,001-33,000 1.00 10.00 20.00 70.00 Heavy-Heavy 33,001-60,000 0-90 0.00 11.10 88.90 Line Haul > 60,000 lbs 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 Urban Bus 0.10 0.00 0.00 100.00 Motorcycle 1.70 82.40 17.60 0.00 School Bus 0.10 0.00 0.00 100.00 Motor Home 1.20 0.00. 91.70 8.30 Travel Conditions Residential Commercial Home- Home- Home- Work Shop Other Commute Non-Work Customer Urban Trip Length (miles) 11.5 4.9 6.0 10.3 5.5 5.5 Rural Trip Length (miles) 11.5 4.9 6.0 10.3 5.5 5.5 Trip Speeds (mph) 35.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 % of Trips - Residential 20.0 37.0 43.0 Page: 12 06/23/2005 11:36 AM rr Changes made to the default values for Land Use Trip Percentages The Trip Rate and/or Acreage values for Condominium/townhouse general have changed from the defaults 6.9/3.19 to 10.24/3.19 Changes made to the default values for Construction Changes made to the default values for Area The hearth option switch changed from on to off. Changes made to the default values for Operations The operational emission year changed from 2005 to 2006. B-9 i--_ F=' r , Appendix i .. Appendix C. Noise Analysis F : MZ �� t� F .YC..J6 :L L Riverlake Villa3 City of Lake Elsinore "' A:1C01 04.OF�lniiialSiw�h lf2itn�o,Er via.INAWSI dy-f—UL m APPe/d/x \ This page ine£ornl/left blank. �\. . . �E": . �y .� ) The Pl kn Center . June,2005 V_m@ r ;\ . 1 "•" Sound 2000 (Caitrans Version of Stamina2/0ptima) '••" INPUT DATA FILE : C:\Rialto Middle School Y6\Noise\Riverside Dr. Future No Project-s32 DATE 6/22/2005 RIVERSIDE DRIVE RESIDENCES future no project i TRAFFIC DATA LANE AUTO MEDIUM TRXS HEAVY TRRS NO. VPH MPH VPH MPH VPH MPH DESCRIPTION ______________________________________________________________________ 1 1809 40 117 40 38 40 RIVERSIDE DRIVE LANE DATA LANE SEG. GRADE SEGMENT LANE NO. NO. COR. X Y Z DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION _____________________________--_____________________-__________ 1 1 N 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIVERSIDE DRIVE 0-0 1000.0 0-0 BARRIER DATA S' i-: Barrier No. 1 Barrier Description: 6 FT SOUMDMALL Type: Wail Barrier Height Increment (DELI) = 0 No. Height Changes (P)= 0 GROUND. TOP BARRIER s-- SEG X Y (ZO) (Z) HEIGHTS AT ENDS ______--`_____________ -___________.._______________-__________- 1 -200.0 300.0 0.0 6.0 51 P1 6 .. 2 -79.0 300.0 0.0 6.0 B1 P2 . 6 3 -79.0 600.0 0.0 6.0 E1 P3 6 -200.0 600.0 0.0 6.0 B1 P4 • 6 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RECEIVER DATA REC NO. X Y Z ID --------------------------------_______.._-___________________ -- 1 -89.0 450.0 5.0 REC 1 2 -89.0 450.0 12.0 REC 2 r .. DROP-OFF RATES LANE RECEIVER NO- No- 1 2 'a.. 1 3.0 3.0 SOUND32 - RELEASE 07130191, MODIFIED 04/22/00�L - TITLE: RIVERSIDE DRIVE RESIDENCES future no project I BARRIER DATA = BAR BARRIER HEIGHTS BAR ELE 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ID LENGTH TYPE ___________ -__________.._______________________________________________ 1 - 6.• B1 P1 121.0 2 - 6-• B1 P2 300.0 3 - 6-- B1 P3 121.0 s ----------------------------------'.--------------------------------- -- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 - REC REC ID DNL PEOPLE LOO(CAL) -------------------------------- I REC 1 67. 500. 62.9 2 REC 2 67- 500- 68.7 BARRIER HEIGHT INDEX FOR EACH BARRIER SECTION I 1 1 ( - CORRESPONDING BARRIER HEIGHTS FOR EACH SECTION 6. 6- 6. C-1 Sound 2000 (Caltrans Version of Stamina2/Optima) *'** INPUT DATA FILE : C:\Rialto Middle School 96\Noise\Riverside Dr. Future Prj 6 ft.s32 DATE 6/22/2005 RIVERSIDE DRIVE RESIDENCES future with project 6 ft wall -------------------------------------------- -----''--------------aa�s-------------------------------------------- TRAFFIC DATA LANE AUTO MEDIUM TRRS HEAVY TRKS NO. VPH MPH VPH MPH VPH MPH DESCRIPTION ______________________________________________________________________ 1 1820 40 118 40 38 40 RIVERSIDE DRIVE LANE DATA LANE SEG. GRADE SEGMENT LANE NO. NO. COR. X Y Z DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION ______________________________________________________________________ 1 1 N 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIVERSIDE DRIVE 0.0 ID00.0 0.0 BARRIER DATA Barrier No. 1 Barrier Description: 6 FT SOUNMIALL Type; Wall Barrier Height Increment (DELZ) = 0 No. Height Changes (P)= 0 GROUND TOP BARRIER SEG X Y (ZO) (2) HEIGHT$ AT ENDS ______________________________________________________________________ 1 -200.0 300.0 0.0 6.0 BI P1 * 6 2 -79.0 300.0 0.0 6.0 BI.P2 6 3 -79.0 600_0 0.0 6.0 B1 P3 * 6 -200.0 600.0 0.0 6.0 BI-F4 • 6 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- RECEIVER DATA REC No. x Y E ID __----_-__-________________________________ -------____- 1 -89.0 450.0 5.0 REC 1 - 2 -89.0 450.0 12.0 REC 2 DROP-OFF RATES LANE RECEIVER NO, No, 1 2 1 3.0 3.0 SOUND32 - RELEASE 07130/91, MODIFIED 04/22/00 TITLE: RIVERSIDE DRIVE RESIDENCES future with project 6 ft wall 1 BARRIER DATA BAR BARRIER HEIGHTS BAR ELE 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ID LENGTH TYPE ___________ -..__________________ _-_-_-----__-__ 1 - 6.* B1 P1 121.0 2 - 6.• B1 P2 300.0 3 - 6_• B1 P3 121.0 -------------- ---------------- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 } REC REC ID DNL PEOPLE LEO(CAL) -------------------------------- I REC 1 67. 500. 62.9 2 ABC 2 67. 500. 68.7 BARRIER HEIGHT INDEX FOR EACH BARRIER SECTION 1 1 1 CORRESPONDING BARRIER HEIGHTS FOR EACH SECTION 6. 6. 6. C-2 ••'• Sound 2000 (Caltrans Version of Stamina2/Optima) ...' INPUT DATA FILE = C=%Rialto Kiddie School 86\Noise\Riverside Dr. Existing DATE < 6/22/2005 Riverside Drive Residences Existing TRAFFIC DATA LANE AUTO MEDIUM IRKS HEAVY TRKS NO. VPH MPH VPH MPH VPH MPH DESCRIPTION ______________________________________________________________________ 1 1238 40 80 40 26 40 Riverside Drive LANE DATA LANE SEG. GRADE SEGMENT LANE N0. NO. COR_ X Y S DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION ______________________________________________________________________ 1 1 N 0.0 0.0 0.0 Riverside Drive ' 0-0 1000.0 0.0 BARRIER DATA p. Barrier No- 1 Barrier Description: 6 ft soundwall Type: Wall Barrier Height Increment (DELZ) = 0 No. Height Cbanges (p)= 0 GROUND TOP BARRIER SEC X Y (ZO) (Z) HEIGHTS AT ENDS .. ______________________________________________________________________ 1 -200.0 300.0 0-0 6.0 al P1 6 _ 2 -79.0 300.0 0-0 6.0 B1 P2 • 6 3 -79.0 600.0 0.0 6.0 B1 P3 • 6 -200.0 600.0 0.0 6.0 91 P4 ' 6 r ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RECEIVER DATA REC NO. X Y 2 ID .. ______________________________________________________________________ 1 -89.0 450.0 5.0 2 -89.0 450,0 12.0 DROP-OFF RATES LANE RECEIVER NO. No. f 1 2 • r 1 � 3.0 3.0 1 BARRIER DATA 5.. BAR BARRIER HEIGHTS BAR - ELE 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ID LENGTH TYPE ------------------.------------------------------------------------------------ I B1 P1 121.0 2 - 6-� B1 P2 300.0 3 - 6.• B1 P3 121.0 ___________________________________________________ 0 1 2 3 4 5 fi 7 1 l REC REC ID OHL PEOPLE M.EQ(CAL) -------------------------------- 1 67. 500. 61.3 F•.t; 2 67. 500. 67.0 BARRIER HEIGHT INDEX FOR EACH BARRIER SECTION 1 1 1 CORRESPONDING BARRIER HEIGHTS FOR EACH SECTION 6. 6. 6. r` i. C-3 � Appendix » Appendix D, Correspondence :. Ez � �. . : FT � (/ � �t® �4} .�\ ��f2 �}\ \7 R RraZ & VZ&I City of Lake Elsinore �E Appendix I\\ \ - This page intentionally mA blank. �\ �\ . �\ ` The Planning Center Jn 205 Vill.a_@rf - �� . �\ f Educational Facilities Services Questionnaire Riverlake Villas Initial Study 1 Please list the names and addresses of all day care centers, elementary,junior high and high schools within your district that currently service the Lake Elsinore Community and surrounding areas. Please include a map, if available, showing s:. attendance boundaries and the boundaries of the school district. Withrow Elementary School 30100 Adelo Street Lake Elsinore, CA. 92.530 (951) 678-0132 Terra Cotta.Middle School 29291 .Lake Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (951) 674-0641 r Lakeside High School (for 9`" and 10"' Graders only in 2005, { V" in 2006& all grades in 2007) 32593 Riverside Drive Lake Elsinore, CA. 92530 no number yet-this is a.brand new high school to be opened Aug. 2005 a. . Elsinore:High School (for 11" & 12" Graders in 2005) 21800 Canvon Drive t Wildomar, CA. 92595 r. : (951.)674-3194 2 What are the existing attendance levels and current capacities at each school facility? Do you have any projections for attendance levels or capacity for future years? f Wildomar Elementary capacity 801, current enrollment 768 Terra Cotta Middle capacity 1534. current enrollment 1.456 r Lakeside.High.capacity 2808,no eru oll-ment inforniatio.n yet Elsinore High capacity 2548, current enrollment 2465 D-1 Continued on the next page 3 What are the average student generation rates per dwelling unit for each school? K-5 G .4105 6-8 @ .1810 9-1.2_G .1588 4 Does the District currently use portable or temporary classrooms at any of its schools? If so, please identify the school and number of portable facilities for each school. NIA 5 Are any new schools or expansions of existing schools planned by the District? New high school--Lakeside.High School to be opened August 2005 New elementary school—Ronald Reagan Elernentary located on 35445 Porras.Road in Wildomar to be opened August 2005 New Middle School— Lakeland Village Middle School located on 18730 Grand Avenue in Lake Elsinore to be opened July 2006 Page?-of 3 Continued on the next page 6 Are fees assessed against new developments for school related services? If so, in what amount for residential and non-residential (commercial and industrial) development? Yes, current residential fee is $ 3.03) per sq. foot and S 0.36 per sq. foot for commercial developments. Response Prepared By: Km-en Koski Facilities Secretary Name Title Lake Elsinore U111fied School District 6/1/05 Agency Date Pae 3 of 3 Riverlake Villas Initial Study Library Questionnaire 1. What public library(s) would serve the proposed project site? The Riverside County Library System currently operates a library in Lake Elsinore that would serve this area.. In addition, another library facility is being constructed on the campus of the new Lakeside High School on the west side of town. The Lakeside Library will open as a combined school and public library open to all residents of the area by September of 2005. 2. Is the existing amount of library space and number of volumes of books considered adequate for the existing population within the affected library service area? If not, what is the estimated deficit of space and/or volumes? Yes, the existing amount of library space and number of volumes in the Riverside County Library System is more than adequate to serve this development. 3. What factors are used to determine the amount of library space and number of volumes to serve a given population? The Riverside County Library does not use a formula to determine library space needs. Library facilities are developed based on local needs and the availability of library service in the target area. 4. What impact would development of the proposed project have on existing and planned library facilities? Local libraries in the Lake Elsinore area have been developed to serve projected growth such as the proposed project. Residents of the project can be served effectively with the existing libraries in the area. 5. What measures are required or recommended to reduce or offset the impacts of this project or the cumulative impacts of this project and other anticipated growth? In 2002, the Riverside Board of Supervisors adopted a uniform mitigation fee for development in unincorporated areas of Riverside County. part of that fee is dedicated for the purchase of materials and the development of library facilities to serve new residents in these areas. Page to f 2 Riverlake Villas Initial Study Library Questionnaire r . 6. Please add any other comments you may wish to make regarding this project. The Riverside County Library System looks forward to serving the needs of these new residents. Response Prepared By: Mark Smith Library Administrator Name Title Riverside County Library System 6/7/2005 Agency Date Page 2 of 2 D-5 June 1,2005 THE PLANNING CENTER ATTN: Jamie Thomas 1580 Metro Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Subject: Preparation of an Initial Study in the City of Lake Elsinore Dear Ms. Thomas As per your June 1, 2005 request for the Initial Study for a 51 unit townhouse style residential development located on Riverside Dr. (Route 74)between Grand Avenue and Lincoln St., encompassing 4.95 acres,the following applies: This project will be served by: Riverside County Sheriff's Department Lake Elsinore Police Dept./Sheriff's Station 333 W. Limited Avenue Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (909)245-3300 There is no additional station that would service the project area. "Average"(accurate) response times vary due to the differing priorities of each call received by 911 and dispatched to officers. What may begin as a lower priority, due to information initially received by Central Dispatch, may become a"Priority 1"situation upon officers' arrival to the location; therefore, these response times cannot be accurately averaged. Every effort is made by Sworn personnel at this particular police station to respond to"Priority 1"calls within 5 minutes or less_ Currently, police staffing requirements for Lake Elsinore are the same as for the County. There is one sworn officer per 1,000 population; one supervisor and one support staff employee per seven officers; one patrol vehicle per three sworn officers; and five school resource officers assigned to local middle and high schools. There are currently 86 sworn officers and 23 non-sworn personnel at this station. D-6 At this time, there is no need for additional sworn officers to serve this project; therefore, there would be no need for new facilities and/or equipment. The above-proposed project does not indicate any unique unforeseen law enforcement problems. Addressing the question of Community Service Programs; we have a City Crime Prevention Officer and a County Crime Prevention Officer that service their respective communities with Neighborhood Watch Programs, Crime Free Multi-Housing Programs, . and safety events, as well as other programs to fit the needs of the communities in which they serve. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at(909)245-3322. Respectfully, Beth Decou—Crime Prevention Officer Lake Elsinore Police Dept./Sheriffs Station L D-7 05/26/2005 14:16 9096747554 ENGINEERING PAGE 04/25 Water Services Questionnaire Riverlake Villas- City of Lake Elsinore 1. From what sources does the City obtain its water supply and in what quantities? Metropolitan Water District,Wells,Surface Water Treatment Z. Please provide the location:of all water wells in and near the project area and estirnates of the mount of water they primp on a monthly or yearly basis_ Al:a, please provide available information on whether groundwater usage has incre ised or decreased in recent years. N/A Continued on neXt page D-S 05/26/2005 14,1b 9096747554 ENGINEERING PAGE 05/25 Riverlake Villas—City of Lake Elsinore r 3. Are there currently any deficiencies in the water system in the project aT Sewer system? No s. 4. What is the size and location of existing water/sewer mains within the vicinih of the proposed project? What new water/sewer lines,if any,are necessary or proposed? There is an existing 10"water line in Ri-verside Drive. 5. What are the average water consumption rates for the project and how is the proposed project likely to impact water consumption? Domestic customers are charged water on a tier system. The first 5 ccf's are$0.929 each, the next 11 ccf's are at$1.234 each, the next 22 ccf's are at$1.50. Anything over 4) cef's are at$1.98. A ccf=748 gallons of water No impact to the District's system. Continued on nea[page E. Page 2 of 3 D-9 06/02/2005 09:07 9096747554 ENGINEERING PAGE 02/02 Riverlake Villas-City of bake Etsinore G. Will any new facilities, such as sizing requirements or new lines,be required For the implementation of the proposed project? N� 7. Do you anticipate any adverse environmental impacts associated with the cur-ent or future provision of water and wastewater service to the project area? If so; what mitigation or conservation measures would you suggest? Pit 8. What other issues are important to your agency? If there are particular cone.ns with the proposed project,what do you recommend to alleviate those coDcerr s? (Please attach additional pages as needed). Title Agency Date Page 3 of 3 D-10 05/26/2005 14:16 9096747554 ENGINEERING PAGE 02/25 Wastewater Services Questionnaire For Rivedake Villas, Initial Study 1. Could wastewater services be provided for the project area? What treaty nent facility would serve the site?(Please indicate location and capacity_) Wastewater can be provided. The Regional Sewer Plant will serve the site. The 5.; MCD Plant is located on Trelaven behind the District office at 31315 Chaney Street, Lake Plsinc re. 2. What is the size and location of existing sewer mains in the project vicinity? The existing sewer line in Riverside Drive is an 8"line_ 3. Will any new facilities, such as sizing requirements or new lines, be equired for implementation of the proposed.project? No 5 k 4. Do you anticipate any adverse environmental impacts associated with tho current or future provision of sewer service to the project area? If so, what mitigation or conservation measures would you suggest? No Continued on to next page D-11 05/26/2005 14:16 9096747554 ENGINEERING PAGE 03/25 Sewer Services Questionnaire far Riverlake Villas 5. What other issues are important to your agency? If there are particular cc ncerns Mvith the proposed project, what do you recommend to alleviate those concern ? (Please attach additional pages as needed). No other issues. You'll need to request a Will Serve Letter from EVMWD_ The Ovate,and sewer connection fees will be quoted on that document in addition to the conditions of servi:e. A Developer Packet has been attached. Response Prepared By: Cher Quinones development and Records Coordinator Name Title Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District 5/26/05 Agency Date ,gage 2 o,f 2 D-12' The last 15 years of 3 2 2 8 1 R i v e r s i d e D r i v e . �1.� � .v.. �/ �' �� OOF LAKE I,;,--LS1NOBL w 4 G DEPT. NNNIN � Site Area: 4.96 Acres u Originally zoned R-3 High Density Residential, allows up to M 24 DU/Acre. Neighboring zoning R-2, Medium Density residential allows up to 12 DU/Acre is compatible. with R3. General Plan Ply,: Designation allows 18 DU/Acre. Proposed project is 10.3 DU/Acre, which is below the R-2 zone. 577710, 1R Y General Plan Amendment changed in November of 1991, _ to commercial to allow a Spa Resort under a Conditional �- MAI RIVERSIDE DRIVE Use Frirrii =. NO f Y HIGHWAY 74 r > 77-7 r l c. The last 15 years of 3 2 2 8 1 R i v e r s i d e D r i v e . r _ Lakeside Adolescent Facility briefly opened its door to the public in the early 90's as it eventually became a financial O hardship to maintain which ultimately led to bankruptcy. Thereafter, the resort was abandoned and the remaining O. 'O - •� ' buildings became a nuisance to the city and nearby residents � y y �Q as it became a shelter to many homeless, transients and drug I users. Doors, Windows, and fixtures were vandalized and stolen. Q 4 O Walls were destroyed in order to obtain wood for fire during the ,t winter months. This practice eventually led to two fires that ° partially destroyed the buildings and spread through the asbestos insulation. The city code enforcement division has p had numerous issues with the property that has included debris, graffiti, and vandalism. t ' n * - ? • � 1 � � � � � � e �-, ',� - vs s'+,;y� r 5�� +' ns�-.wS 'r f jar; `tr p '.r-; w' � � Uzi �y n •'. .... � ,. 1};;x. 1 � �`g } t 4 ��� �i J � ' 5 i ti �.. -�s j � ,.�._ �_. � � �. -i C�. �, M..u.. ... .... . .ems:.� ,'tv*�r .. m.a� If j ��` 4 ��� rr .<. .+ �t; r 7 J" yr r ���= „�,, �.�aans�.rv�;;mwv�as ues.e. �+ „ i s � T ., �;. .i. . n .. ? - ', - �& 't 9 eti�Y'4' ���`ea"� r�,id ?Y�l f �Si'��`5''-'�y s}'���,-✓t J� ti t�jl � ,h 4 r`r� `-w}N�r �� � � h �a e���]3� � � {����3'k�ryg���,,��s—,, ���"t ;�'.`a1.fi �roJ����lkc ��;�yt� �,��`�-4�F�tr.�<v r�7- i s t '-) � - �: t��. �4`emu`�i�y'�'`"3'�`�,��s�S ��'2T'v � +y� �� ��"'�Sa^�:y�+�'�'�, r i .y. ,. -<� . 4,.;_ .z a �.:"��. '-+lhGl� �ar"� x�b�-�ti':. � .. _' •• •� � �� � # � 5 � ? F t f ':t +p� rl l p � r r _ � � � � ��� t .�� �� fit. q�•�W F q � 3, � r �L S -. Y •�.� f \� .r - -"r. xx„ � -,,y � y <�.�.-'ate � wy� ����y:p.L.t.y�'�r,� �''��r� �� �. .,4` 7i► / � � Present conditions at 3 2 2 8 1 R i v e r s i d e D r i v e . 4 •a'r iN Lx��f t F�� - A complete demolition of the abandoned Spa took place in November, 2004. The asbestos that had been exposed due to the fires has been completely removed. There are no further disturbances or nuisances to city officials or nearby residents. Y 2 ' 1 The future proposed at 3 2 2 8 1 R i v e r s i d e D r i v e . 4 Request: GPA change to MHD (Maxium Units allowed 18 DU/Acre) A General -Plan Amendment to change it back to its original zoning of R3, Medium to High Density Residential. Benefits: The security and comfort that offers a Private Clubhouse and Amenities gated community Pride of ownership, big open spaces, and visitor Substantial increase in Annual property taxes parking Entry level housing for Lake Elsinore Excellent project that is walking distance to the new High school The re-development of a parcel that has been an eye sore for more than 15 years S 1 I 77 3 Z 2 8 1 R i v e r s i d e D r i v e . Residential vs. Commercial Estimated Home price $330,000 Imaginary Strip mall with 35,000 SQ FT Total Home Sales $16,830,000 Sales Volume between $3,000,000 to $3,500,000 Annual Property Taxes $185,130 Annual Taxes estimated at $262,500 ... RENTS MUST BE IN THE $1 .85 to $2.25 PER SQ FT TO SUSTAIN SUCH SALES ..* Average Current Market Rent in surrounding areas $ .75 to $980per square foot. In order for a commerical development to be viable at this location, rents must be more than double than its neighboring shopping centers, where vacancies are abundant. No healthy commercial development can sustain rents below $1 .00 in Southern California. n MACHADO ST TENTATIVE TRACT 32674 E FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES 11RACT[7NO 145 6 tiON `-'� do R ti > o A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 5.4 IN TRACT NO. 137.79 PER MAP --� ,z 11 10 9 a 6 s a 3` 2 1 1 a JOB RECORDED IN BOOK III PACES 59 TO B3- 15 t c i ON CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CONUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. son3 w J 7o ? z STATE OF CALIFORNIA Q 16 22 w E 12 MAP PREPARED JUNE, 2004 21 20 19 18 L 7 16 15 14 1 CD _.(It. CONCR1 A 13 I . 17 \ CONCxC[0.0Cx wALI -^ 23 275. } P 1 OR7EGA ,e 49, — 'rj5cc .=0sx ter— 1 . • 1 4 HWY �ELSINORE AKE " I 24 12 19 72 44 45 1 46 ' 72' I I GENERAL NOTES A 25 - 7!• 43' 70' 11 I _ I� -__ �_ APN 379/315-033 43 . A7 16 .k VICINI I'Y MAP SCALE 1' 41X � EXISTING ZONE - R-3 K] 21 `� 77, a, F_ GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION - GENEREL COMMERCIAL - a 6 r 42 u 48 r�i I�a ' `--—i' AREA - 4.95 OF LOTSACRES � 59 (HDMES1 oll 1-) 22 r' 7T' fit 74 o I�1 ? LOT A'- PRIVATE ROADWAY AND PUBLIC 41 1,a z 4 49 70 Lz,- UTILITIES. -.r.�nuirv'asla.-xa r tOC�F 23 y81 28 4a 71 Sfi' I u :•vrn!<i,x•u:�<vs LOT "B" - COMMON AREA OPEN SPACE R 24 sD' 7a �+ z a 50 60. z 'r �1' AVERAGE LOT SIZE 2.450 SF. a o r!' &6 DENSITY- 10.0 UNITS/ACRE u��11 A'a 35 - "A" UNITS 25 iN. / 39 - u -`SI 2 � rr:n+pv — 10 - "8'UNITS _C"UNITS 26 a ` I 1" J 38 •„"( u 52 8 I a;.,ar v>y * " PARKING REQUIRED PROVIDED 30 108 —'—'� COvERED 08 27 TA m _ 7Jy— I OPEN 0 1 1/3 126 24a JJ 631 l' / `3\ u ZJ w r rE 73' - I rr�'R: .-d•'G'GT/dN/NTE.E%OR' TR'£L°r TOTAPRIVATE OPEN 28 �h 54 1 r N9 M1,N/ SPACE 5.400 SF. 60,294 S.F, I72 88��� 36 y�, 4\ r 29 I ,:Ay Sr' _%' COMMON OPEN r EXISTING EASEMFNY: SITE ADDRESS 3 S 1211 \ ° I. 3'TEI£PHONE'ON NECY,NWLY h SWL'Y 32281 RIVERSIDE DRIVE SPACE 13,500 SF. ,1.593 SF : LAKE ELSINORE,CA. 92530-7820 ' 9� �5 sraRM DRAIN � 3 2. 4'ED1510N DN ALL SIDES ALL STRUCTURES TO RF REMOVED FROM SITE. 30 c0 20'GATES C9 ly 3. 12'EDISON ON NTL'Y AND NWL'Y SIDES. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL EASEMENT ARE Yf11HIN i11E BUILDING FEES TO BE PAID 1N-UEU OF PARK LAND SETBACKS, LOT 154 IN TRACI N. 13799 AS PER 124 a 34 �35 51 1 2 MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 111.PAGES 59 UTILITY PROVIDERS THE PROPERT'r IS NOT SUBJECT TO 6.1 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS. IN THE ELECTRIC-S0, CALIF. EDISON -' 10 ANY OFF-SITE DRAINAGE. KIFNGE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF GAS- THE GAS COMPANY _ RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. -TELEPHONE- VERIZON 32 - — Re S' R- S' AI. TURN ONLY LAN` DEVELOPER: SEWER -ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT. WATER - ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT N Jr 39'L 9s.39' �� SPATHCO n TELEVISION CABLE- COMCAST CABLE e o SUIT NURPHY CANYON ROAD LAKE BIRCH STREET DEDICATE 17' OF $EWER WATER � EXISTING 10"WATER MAIN SUITE /902 LAKE ELSINORE,CA. 8$$-255-5789 ROADWAY CONN, CONN. SAN DIEGO. CA, 92123 TRASH COLLECTION- CR&R - _ 1(858)292-5I85 223 WEST MARKHAM STREET OWNER: PERRIS.CA. 909-943� 1991 , �� �F LAKE ELS11 I� DRIVE �x1sTING SEWER MAIN 1JOHN800 LF.E 1900 SOUTH MENI.O g: l�/ 11 T HIGHWAY 74) LOS ANGELES,CA 90006 RECE!^F1 " --- - I(85B)292-5,a5 ---- q �o�` CIVIL ENGINERR/LAND PLANNER £Aa;/NEC�7 IN —V,ITV OI1 LAX_ELSINOR& CALIFORNIA -- Lp/( `Yb. PIANNING DEPARTMENT m° LA-1110E TLC DERMOIT R£SFlONS/dL£CHARGE R�OQOD °) 1a075 LaVENTANA f7/I/ER4AKE V1L4AS MURRIETA,CA.92362 `MKAtY < ! ' 909-JOK-0111 Fax 909-696-3218 a .vow I �,w Ana w.•</!Na v4if�.a.-•2^ a mpl Im Gd0076tarlNlinL.l 1O""—• �r ,•..—».--- , 0,12.-...w -LN p TENTATIVE TRACT 32674 N IRA T NO 145 6 I FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES 12 11 10 9 6 7 6 - 5 4 } 2 I t5 I A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 54 IN TRACT N0. 13'779 PER MAP s roo' w 3 s.vo' RECORDED IN BOOK 111 PAGES 59 TO 63. —' 21 _ I CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CONUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 16 zz I STATE OF CALIFORNIA \ .P A' A kA A A 4 13 - 17 C 1 I 16 SWQ V-40' 2 19 A 45 A jl I - 8 4 646 I 1 6 6 20 _2 4 i t A 43 21 2 A A Q A QU 22 42 0 A 48 2 A z AW a I NOTES 41 �� 49 23 2 C �.1 C I -- - N �' 1.SYMIS TO D[CUi x AI iR uix. 24 40 6 L-z A50 I�, 1 aa+ol rneol Axo oD.a4 m coxslxucna- Y =.A PA4ED DRA4ICF SM4f. I. � CAId DnA4 k FF[,OR 91iC4 25 9 C 39 A C 7 `"� I 4F��MD.Arwtw�i siorn.�S , V P.4WG[r�C��oS�Ixx 1 — xwu FSIl s ED w+RAa 26 a A 3 A �- 38A lu 52 - A 0 x 27 3 1 'J7A j 6 53 A L' < A I aaww s Ix. 26 3 36A A5 o A. TYPICAL LOT FINISH CRAOINC p�0�GWES� T?� ` 3 C - 1 1 C - U CD N /'1 9 CONDOMINIUM SITE PLAN TYPICAL_ UN11 S k. 1 L a ITY OF MKS 61SWO"`CALIFORNIA0E EN0INERR/.ANO PLANNER ENfHER/N PLAHNfNODEPARTXENT LoN 0 RPOR CHARGE a0?SaEN RI/ElLAff• VILLAS - - OODOfANA MVOETA,CA.92562 909-304-0$11 far 909-696-5218 2 a__z._ mall WcdO071kcrw> nk—t •iA.InMr..yryw _ . - ws.wwJLE�--w�.wwwww__ MNIR.YMC 1'.K•. IEIII.SSAIC 1'•Y n.[xo. MACHADO ST TEN iATIVE TRACT 32674 N I FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES I s TRA T NO 145 6 R 2�O�E Q o A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 54 IN TRACT NO. 13774 PER MAP --� 12 11 g 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 31 z 1 I JOB RECORDED IN BOOK 111 PAGES 59 TO fi3. t5 I I q oM R CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CONUNTY OF RIVERSIDE s too' -r s s.7o I z W STATE OF CALIFORNIA m. 16 31' 22 s' J7' JI' tJ5s' Q Wyl R VER ID� R 21 20 1 MAP PREPARED JUNE, 2004 CM16 S'Yq,'am w 13 23\ a I ORTEGA n 18a 7T wy x � ^ LAKE I y H 1 29 LS24 tEINORE 12. 44 7Z1 I'll, i GENERAL NOTES 25 I SL 020 APN 379/315-0 33 43 Iz6 47 SCALE -4 VICINI TY MA a GENERAL PLAN DES IGNATION GENERE4 COMMERCIAL 42 u 48 4` I�v AREA - 4.95 ACRES 77' a ti N NUMBER OF LOTS- 54 (HONEST 22 d27 74 �, i •L LOT"A'- PRIVATE ROADWAY AND PUBLIC r 41 •� `_ - 49 I f-�H`' UTILITIES. �pppy ,•.,,,�,�..,�;•.•p;plTr�pW 28 vp,�iJ a0 71 my `+B 8 s ""'x.:�..;•wc���r.rr LOT"B"-COMMON AREA OPEN SPACE 24 g' �' 70' w N 50 60' L �? 4 AVERAGE LOT SIZE 2.450 S.F. +/- g$ 71 3. DENSITY - 10.9 UNITS/ACRI: 7= 25 ' 29/� 39 --_ -�51 7 �o�� _ Nr/,�Kv , 15- .A., UNITS 10 - "B"UNITS 12 — r 6'9" < 71, �` 74' �, �i �►. r - .' rw '� 9- "C"UNITS 26 r" 3o a - 38 ,"{ w It 52 1 6 eI•wi ^.Iev ervrn PARKING REOUIRLO PROVIDED �_ .�—� 0 73' I COVERED 54 105 �frip�'� 27 60 1 TN "— J OPEN a 1 1/3 72 T36 u 31 /, �7 J ., 753 1 5 TOTAL 126 2a4 61' �. < 7J, rrrr.,�rt.�rcrrov,/n/rrx�arg7-A rr_ A:..�.xi PRIVATE OPEN 28 �_ ,\ 54 j r �-- SPACE 5,400 S.F. 60.294 5-F, �32 �I S6 !1' 4, Nr COMMON OPEN 29 �i,; J1' U ._ 7 EXISTING EASEMENT; SITE ADDRESS SPACE 11500 S.F. 21.593 SF _ S' ` 127 I. S TELEPHONE ON NCL'Y, NWL'Y&SWL'Y 32281 RIVERSIDE DRIVE 'A 6. 1 3 \ 2. 4'EDISION ON ALL SIDES LAKE ELSINORE.CA. 92530-IeZo ALL STRUCTURES TO RE REMOVED FROM SITE. 30 +y CD STORM DRAIN('A7ES ' ' 7,• 3. 12'EDISON ON NF.L'Y AND NWL'Y SIDES. LEGAL DESCRIPTION— rya ALL EASEMENT ARE WITHIN THE BUILDING FEES TO BE PAID IN-LIEU OF PARK LAND 11 SETBACKS. LOT 154 IN TRACT Na, 13799 AS PER ljj1� a �3i y5 1 I Y 2 MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 111,PAGES 59 UfILITY PROVIDERS YO• 1 THE PROPERTY IS NOT SUBJECT TO 63 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, IN THE ELECTRIC- SO. CALIF. EDISON TO ANY OFF-SITE DRAINAGE. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF GAS- THE GAS COMPANY 32 __ RIVERSIDE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA, TELEPHONE - VER120N R� 5' R" 5' R T TURN ONLY LAN DEVELOPER: SEWER-ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT. IG1 — WATER - ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT F 95.39' - SPATHCO TELEVISION CABLE -COMCAST CABLE 4994 MURPHY CANYON ROAD DEDICATE 17'OF a SEWER WATER EXISTING 10" WATER MAIN SUITE y 402 556 BIRCH STREET ROADWAY _ CONN. CON.. SAN DIEGO,Ca, 92123 TRASH COL E 71ONLAKE ELSIN- CR&R68-255-5789 1(858)292-5185 223 WEST MARKHAM STREET —'— _ OWNER: PERRIS.CA.909-94J'-1991 RIVERSIDE DRIVE '— EXISTING B"SEWER MAIN JOHN IEE (STATE HIGHWAY 74) 1800 SOUTH MENLO LOS ANGELES, CA 90006 1(858)292-5185 ' - - IFY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA ® CNX ENGINERRAAND PLANNER FN6Nf.CA rN - PLANNING DEPARFMENF LA-ENCE 0.MC DERMOTT RESPCINwfitc C'NAA'"47 "" iY19i101 RIVERLAKE VILLAS /?_0000 19075 LOVENTANA MURREIA.CA.92552 909-30"IH To.909-696-5210 u a.v wn— — emall Imed0070eo'L m..k •n�4_....w._1�'P eam a'R 1M[.Smc:1•:w w r ; Tf= NTATIVE TRACT U674 TRA T NO lay 5 i FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES 9 8 7 1 - 5 a 3 2 l 15 + A SUBDIVISION OF E01 54- IN TRACT NO. 13779 PER MAP s rao' w J s, 12 14 10 70 RECORDED IN BOOK 111 PAGES 59 TO 63, a CITY OF LAKE El- NORE, CONUNIY OF RIVERSIDE 16 N 22 E STATE OF CALIFORNIA .A A- A A A m A q i3 17 C r tirat I'.ny 2 19 A 45 A C + ---__ co 2 9 q4 a4b B 20 4 n A 43 A 47 21 2 A _ A Z A V 22 2 A 42 z A 48 A I A � 6 I NOTES 23 2 C al �� 49 G I.s+.Ars m xl cur w.r Is+w, 9 r A I$ y IT aac«a.x•x9 wnm 1^ nowc caslau[nax, 24 40 g 50 !>F 1 )..rrxo pPAw.fA s+w.c GCp 9.4x A M.u.OT ER s 25 9 C ,/ 39 A `_ ♦� C 7 I! M OPDDO 1-x IS \ I�fr� s ` xcNaw^a eta owner a -df�UW C.lixus I.N 26 a A xre�esuel�sa,w o+.w..0 3 A C 38A 52 _ A I K.. o n 27 28 A 3 38A b O A j TYPICAL LOT FINISH GRADING 29 J J 0 3J A A�.: l� , — so'tAtts� f?'I� 35C. 2 A p U 32 C (� o ' N JT00'S8•E J95.59' 9 CONDOMINIUM SITE PLAN TYPICAL-_ UNITS ITY OF LAXE$LSINORF. CALffORNIA m n mmo+mxm.mr CIA-ENONERR/LANO PLANNER ENGW£ER IN —_ PLANNING UEPA",WENT LAYINENCE 0.MC OERMOTT R£SPON51!7L£CHARGE .,. rn.wmw 18075 L01ENTANA Rll/[RLAKE I/ILLAS —0000 MURRIEiA,CA.92,%2 909-304-0111 Fax 909-696-5218 u a�a='rM2n sxux 2 v1 a..k Im Ca0070+0,IhImk,.I to r H,v r y w n __ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE RECEIVED J O N 2004 -- PLANNINC.®EP N 53'00'00" W 545.J1' I PLANTING LEGEND D D n 3' --- - n D WWTT �rx<n�vs xcwM.�aiw... °x lnw // W.,n wd r d D D D D D CO D D co U) a.o,.x.ro>m xw iovta ual rn d � ,rns D L-] nnox.�w.wwx• .,w c�,. .x n,n ,< ;0 u9iw�C n � ❑ / � mr.x,x.,.i, �.�,mwf r* �v°, fxavrt 1 cn D I D I m n a I D D r, I D > © a ,v 53.00100" W 545..31' FL )0L) NTRGL CHANW71 SITEE: PLAN AND CONCEPTUAL. LANDSCAPE —R •••TT _ !TV OF LAKE EMPORQ CALIFORNIA �v n mfmm vwom PLANNING AEPARMWr RA/ERLAKE VIUAS l'xIKK11- W. . XMApt• - SNff,�1—s E -v O Z au a P4 �o Is C a¢ ZPOd r______ ________� I I ( �•d Ohl WZJI-�_ W GG I J�ONam•0 >}W PY I I I � ❑C]❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ JEC 33 UPI �N �y �S oar r^ Q _j Lif D. ,at mm 0E)4 7m� m L m o - -17[ft -- un SIDE ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION __j W o.c-w MaE DRAM-Bv vrEFaS rr�,: . -- ^, -"' 7 "�::a, 14i+',.•.:.,.' '�"�°i.: -.,,tip., ..;. : I .�'_.--.-": .-- fi-':.., '1..,",. 'S,. '4 i F .vr. �g+ . .•nl Cam'{' •. .-r. .5.•:, + Jt,., I- �7' --.d. ,.5'•E'=�,^::5`is._ s..a t,�': �,�:{*•�r,4, y s�:. vrW- ;f:�;, 3•L:.•t?- p •6'0.0•et 1P' ip,,`?F ..w.i,•�vr- '*,,i ,7..ry ,-3, T � -W—}L -.s „�ti r -•.�n� "i,r� J :�..-^•.7!r'§✓ ��I �. f"« �5"` 1. .�,. e.r�,^�M�,,••,j{,, x. �5. S,r'.�' � $.'_-0 ,� .� �. „Z, +f,. a "�.hs. v.�' r. ..�... � ? C Jk..' .�'�' •F ..-1+.' > a 3 0 -t.' c- �.z y ,•rC. in •y[. • ','r nyL,F ...a. �x u;try zz °L"Y 'S Y. t". f ie r+ Y,• T PF' _ Job .A�1 :C'•s',y:.,S hLTI%f� k.�. i:' '"K - _ •� P f} 1:i:• •G is e i{ ,k�s 1 } 4 r J i 1• �La• "t BA 1 Y «f y' 3•` d f• f L SET• m.5 a a 72 1 4 .„ti• n< •b 1 2m I" -1 c`� tz• a .lays �m'"'U NO" �•OPiuN aUF A 1 1 ^b - - W U^ R. y$ i �, I OLO6ET I. r •n •r•{ CLOSET •1ll7OaEN•' — a 'I LOFT kv'r, jl T• 0. O 'Q O j .3 �O ,i�. .F _ 3 �..•. •.y �,�r TO�0.ET. •r:a�r ,•:, --k 'A _ - CLOSET .CLOSET Ids:' .'° - .ARAC i .. ... •Jexr..,.,,•. .. A BEDROOM 2 .._._BEDROOM i 10�6- 12'-10� F I2'710" V/ S 20'-1 Ilia" Q a FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN —' cr O -: .. . LIVNG AREA: 1535 S.F. e•...I GARAGE: 427 .F., 1.; 11` ', .0 ..........iiiii� .ii.,.i.I.A.i. .................... ..........u.1".'. . vu v.u4-T.V, VAIN Plu'liflu nun lunar 11 l ........... =swim" N�No ............ mxuuannnnuulltlrll ............................. .. ....... .................. ...... y. 'k as . .. a KNOW: I W-6. IF o- ARAU a i r t. I t M '•s -CLOSEY LSE �'� Qj, R •::'' k ♦ ro w c Q" 09 ' rd zows3. t1VING d 2(r-4" NMNG I4 • I C-4"M 21'-r Q Lo FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAP J O. o Fri LIVING AREA;: 1.29'I S.F. LLJ -i GARAGE:.:.' 430 'S'.F: w SCALE:- 1 or f , 5. B!p ROOM 1 B�OROOM .'.i". 1 ..Y G A`Q '}• t �{ •+`' CLOSET CLOSET 1 I_ J:� �t�.. •�!• I 2ZF pp :I Jp, y^•„ t:;' `s#e :a - .4. cam+-. a`"• KITCHEN.O.O20 •r� ,B .53hjjI£ • 1 0 r, BEOROON 3 • LINNC. ,OWRNO p'_�•y 10'-y' '•,a � � s J � FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN Y a ' Q.. c. J p LIVING AREA: 1291 S.F. LLJ . GARAGE: • 430 'S.F. >_ L` SCALE: 1/4"— 1' - wk � I .P41.13'1'l•llull,,I.6i IIIAIII °1i°elini �iniumna.... nvii�nnrnuuaenmamc ' Iral.lrnlrinl ninnr,nr.. - rinr�nea,nallllilaiiiii nr — iYiLllnnYnrnr�tlnl,nneYll,plrr%riiril��llri Yl,. eir°rn nlnoenlntu rinncwn... r mnl.m a.r r�rnuoni'ni Y::�Gileiiiil:ii,il- n tun r.,menisiiiiairi u�i�i°on�rmi'•iivieirei"ewer,�rri1iiri%'e.l! .miinu .,� r���nurmaa,aa¢unnwr ntanu. i91r ru uennrno newel _ 'a il,a is nam � r AIR .. barnpn i;nu,.... ..,��au�e Innlmrun��nuernluuneanart nen,lnnnreamllaa' ,na„-.. nel�iieieii�ii:�:�..- r mmumu,�¢rua:uonEnaonnrnuiuuernu.¢nu,enn.r uaenn.. _ .urC'iiiii�oniuinimr1°'eri�aluuenuaumlnlunounaru.nannrmrruuuuecnrntmimrrnouYnra�._ I - oiiuiir diii:?i3iYiiirnuas,ruurcrxal�mr rmrnuruunvnnlmm�nr,rnnuurnrnnlrrnnnnuaun•unr:uunnmun�r.: 'Im�ni 'i inoamuYna:uw:onu,�lunuulmmu,ti+leiiii liiiiuiiii�iiilwnunnumm�uurnruw,a:uuu:ummm�mnlnnwnniannnlneoa,nnn,t - I n. I im r� � �►�N X9r�v5rKA _ : I��i`7lil�r� ��� Y tY ���� `� � ,. i wu.l,uu..rru.,ue„.,r,>w�a A .., .� s m,_,:,:-.;.,.x....�_.,,,z-.a'r r,. ,. ...}. r v-5 y r.,,t a=r:..r.>r„-:--aM 'f•'9'- 1 -v r. .1s.5`�'Q'4 .,�T r— ey.�' -:•r - P4^> R -- •...:.., L._,. c-. ... -..-„_:,.._ .'h..... J' ,m. -.-r-a.r�.-rx. i�,';' .w r,•.v:ro,rk-. :s.u. .3>,P .z. -,.,: � 3' ` "`:3', m .A, •.vr4 ;-ty- .:F. :. ..J•. .e-�,ur'�„ ;~ rr :4� 'a -vJ •a:,, -.y, 5 st - �.r"+ w°><-i.. +.� %':S r'til:" ,fit• .Y. r��- :.kt,Y. L.er..s,• i<,C< ?s �n wt':,,ah a: ._�SY. ' r -''i ;b".: -,'V+ .'ri. - '.5 't: .:5 S• •.�._ ,r. -r>- •.a,.S.?3;.- ar l ,t. �'rN.z,r...ifa��. .�Y C•• _t,. ,.,r: „ ,e�,.,,4 .;:!^ck��}-Y:'Ja'.•'.r:.r 1, r-: ,.%'. _ o:,x.}'ZCxi.,�n��'.•-� �,C:.,.-�i:4?.�-.M.• e; .;a.!-�wf...,.. r '.y Y Y J k':X` F tr .(v' 1, � +r iYl�.� 1G-• A � -iS� t !� 1' J.! .1, ',L i •'x 4. f F ?".. ! y. 1 i l pistol MASON stoats" } J2tr riz`i r + _ J a c_ -_ ,E >r 3 rrJ t t-ar uz , 1� , :tl i .-taa, r: i a �., •La,,{ .RJr S.�.-yi l. 'r J• F h 4 k 4 +, F 'rJ. -4 r 2':, .l 5'I s'..✓6l �cs.:,!;1. Y M1. 4 ' J .•x- J� .r£=.�NNiNG.:: -iSNNC, ..� xr.., BED 6DM�•S ?v 54 a :.L, it ^'o�. :�--,- OAGAA w� r fr •� 4 t 4-s � xyjr 1i. ...x Ir 7 a it '' Pn, r-- �! r..`�`•� Tg[ 104, . b � WAS f tLosex ctosr h tt o-`• r.. 1_ 1 r.. � 1 I.. J-y- J � .,-ct. r•. r.. I [ y t Y 5 � �•�, � l ;.1 r T 1 JJ r AWS 5 aJ,. I 4 .. r.;' • r' ,:efosoo p S;Ill r -no tools J _�.•i.,S J .i., rr i,_tj. l s .� �r�• xr.t T.. .r.. ,..:. � •. -+ .. :.,:'<; r� :: '•; Uzi -t�.e•. .y J A; F TJ -Y5 -v<d:, -, >..J s E' .r. v ,' -yi S.�yr., -�' Yyy�t,,1 rrr/1•..,4�� 1 ,.r� eDRIP 3 k 1 1 � i a. 4:/r• Mr." .4. a,� �r'•',2. r. ,.,,, i'' + a,Y '3., •a r.r ,M'r A' g �rw V..: r ! ,,Jt d f .£ F i S -"S .'1•c l),Y �- � 'Ni,'.S %•"t �_.� 5 '-7'r-' l�'�' r� � WAY W )� Y }6 r • ''.-1 t A G,. 1 'b•}•�' �2� YA.3.' a J „.... -+ .-..-,•.' ,...,... ,. -v-.: ..: -,i: - kr -:<.'.`+ ,.., l:..,:. t, «. �--:-Mr• `S,:s r.:.-rsr i.c 6i;1. q}s r.>• � ''rr5 r, r.c .,.d a e5r5 �' '+, �n �r i•J d �=Q, r' .k'+• .a. 4- r a. 1 1^ :,5..? c e .�1- ,kry o5'. -:,� :. �'-`:� .:ig6�'• .L.:a .v ,c�•s. ' , r '"-• a-': .>< t, � _ - M �r.._ �. _.:,., :.s .,� -,•. J „g_ ';r.. ;'J .,f•,e v yC�„ z nA �••1�> .r.,: J IY •,w a Ki �>rr .:il!. t4. ti?'. �R' ram. ,7. ,.+:_r, =� •J, t',I.. :k♦, S. .?+':• ,.�, ! :i.`--- .�} 4 l�.- ?.1"fit-.a - pp G' -i ,r., .. , ,., ,. r,.. .4,�..� r.J:.N♦.t.' e,,,.a .. . i :.: -u.,../-, .. ,.!� �i. �rY'r..'L1. �. .•! ,.y4„ r- '1:, >r: 1 „-'l; .Y t ` :�`` �1, -,r, .., ,f .�', 1. a.» \ -! ..z, .t_ .t J 2-• .tip r,.. ., -,�•,�.;' 'w,. a'k •.l,, ..,t;s«7` r�:. z,'t({, ;b�x-Jc I a3l..o •�€Ot 'Y j ca t .J*-�p,��r �i,+J'. , '%• W iJ,., ns._ t'r-. ..r, ..... ... ..... a t ,r L.,f.'.: .i, 1,,yra\ tt n _.. )-... :r.:,. T' '1: i:7' {- d. ,J�Y.13 .E 1 ,,. .n,- ...>. ..x,,.,,-,.>, ::... . . ::..: ......a.r,.:•. .a,.., . f -• „-: ,,. �-, c. . :r_ ''tF ,.a. �,. s`. a: ,tix --{ ,•,t1`'' mot' --t L .i?„ _t...r .A r- 1-0_t y v. r' l::r:. 7}.s� � .JJJ.•> fY.. -k.. r. f� :.n -.4r• ,,ry '� ,4: ti..a. .> �. I.:. x •a_ ,r,. a ,�•'�'�s ,:,, t..�Pati r;.. t, �};.f :�;,'., .c. .ra_�c,_.. �Y '; �,. ,.$•J. r 5..a.:rK 5 r ^i.;}.-C, �}"y.. 's I is. ,!,'..Gf. ,*u 3, ! .,�"r� � �.' -.i. ,k� -r. f. u: .Y. ..r` 1'�; .,rr 4b F cr r,: '?- L- :-'`Yld z,u � ws.;��:• L: 5 � '.;G�•'1f r ds 73"f, ••^C'7 1•Yi•,�•:i:a, b'�(Ji 1 :1. ,7 ..� ,Y: t rs\'. �,{,,. 'fDJ � l:. � k .>� •r,«r :F .� � ! �) .(i� it v r! ,i',,,�, �>"6�r J� H r ;Y a.' m �, rd „r y':..f �,: b �:. � „a:•�,>`;a s L _1 .j I�'ZT' :�l. rgS a'.. a, us; -.tsr�'v p{ ;lh >• .y'.,UV >~�'ra'"h r�po S F'?,. _.jM?S' �' •-�y n+ rle° a. ..�.',{r'' '',.e �' 'FE'- ,.� .'� r-x � -� � 1.�§7:,� � �"` kT- S.1.- �. iN"'7Fr k. S� -a z F •YJAf -if' S- an' 'i — +a' �k +�. k rx -t <q, .+• i-``*!.'i .3'- Sri - 3 'rt.�',t" �v "_^�'± :C _ :4?'T - :t•% f r.d;. �r. Y 'k e`'�r� .''}}.{��L'b9 - ,�+ 1t, �hlll_ �'L:''{r�i'` µr. �i',',;'�•'iHtF{.tl. „� d :$. kn3.- d1 �:1 :r. 7` �iYs,' •',� ;:(•E',�� .'Y ,J:-y.. ,�. v' ,.s,,. •4�_ f.�,_. M� �1 �4. >.��Y- '�; ,:'vs C�a�l ,-�.• may' ..:,r�4'eF�.«,a%,+r`a%.+:��esF�7.r..7:�,rd•f:,a<&,7,�'r•bvSv»',.rsr:-;rr,at?;7t..�7d�'If:A'�:tilAM'Sw'w,�L,.�.- `atd,' zt:.5.r�1_•L:r�'4�!'a�a32..er:��.ti'� T�`:7�lt :d_�•^�'a L:.f h +r �� � �..'V Y�C'WE: '•hf � "rh' s'st,,,F t.�'?�'a*r-aK3'>rv. 1y J'-,{�».�rl _c,1ki<:�<aFsSa»r,�T,em:.Jl�. 3'i7l�.J „� 1).:?,1...4• ru.:i;W> u`�' b�;ia...'�J>� is: �. ,, -Jn' yR'S„ r �.! xl1-r ti.7r e z, -� r- }. _a y,�r;->r.e.w,n't_ t "'s 's„ +1 �s4 v sw'� 'fin+.Ka,�Ar..rT�eF �, ` +�u.F,C,Y^.`.• +.;K^._araiR,?: _{yY•' rr •-•r. ryd >' '�"'G _ } 4 �' 1 k�SqJ' .ems <' c' -i'II } .f ,ip41,...�./,`�•;•:T it:.Y...:r_ j'g... `'T ! _ �,.: '1 _t e, :V: _ - ' T .,• . :. ',', - .,.. . t' F.' .�.w. .:i�•:: d i L '.-t' I .. d i t Y u: r. a t u < ,i.;-�"�'"1,r.:.,�-:i�.-1-'...,-.�....:,�'.-----.,:-,----�....:.-.�"-,,--.�;.,t.'.---,�.,-...',`:..-:.,-t.1".r;...,i'!--...I,...!.,.�.;Fk:',-,.��,,".-.-:;,I�......�,'-..,,-,:.-.-:-,.,,T-.��.....�--�4..-_�t.;�;.�,'�.';.,-..:--'.1�L...�-�t,..-,,"!,'::,:-..I.;�;..-�.'..-�,,��-..,;....-.-.J.;.',"_1-.S1,.".',,.�-;-;-:.".,::!�-i,.1�j..-,,,`,j,'..-�.;%.,.r.�;-IIa�t.-�-�-�,l'i,.4.l i,,,4,.:,'i:..;...---.:...rr,-,��,-,�.7,..�:-�'.�......-.,..,-....-�,;.�-�-1�-,I.-.'l".�.'...'.;.-,".,.-�--..,':...,--..�j-.�t,:":.;,,`t..,...,!:.�---'-.1.,.�"',-.-1.,�,�..I�--�,�.'.-:.".,.:�';�.:..,-.-..-.�.,,...1;..%.,.�,..,-'...i*,....:."-...,!-.,��'�-..-,.,'1- 7 .�....m r1_�I.%.."1:.1-,�7,.-,-1 1.--::.,.i',.'.I.";:�,_;-.�,i,�1,:.'I.-L r,1:-.1,.'-,��.-..-1',-....I-'..;-,:.�,.',...1,...l.-�"��-:;,::..,I..:-..-1_;`..",...,-�-...,..,:�.,.-.I...1.T,,....,-.,r-.--..?--.'�,...,-.;r-....,--.:....---':.,.1-1l-.'�-.....,,.�,,._*;...f%-I:,".;,..I�....:,..1.,.J,���.... i..-;�_--.,!-;-,.-*.,..,;.."�,.,,",,�-..�.:1,-.�1�.O...-."t...1-.,"'�*.,.1.�.!k 1.".�.-.--,��i:...-.-...;",I.�,.�.-.,.�..:-..3,-,.��".:;,-,P.....t'-..--%....-;...',.--,.'�.i.,rt"l'....-,'o.,;,..'�*N,--,,-.�--,i;:..;.,�."p."..:.1,i".-�.,..-1.",�Z.1:.,.;.��..'-;-'...-;.l:T1Ij,.-..-;f..1.�'.�,;1.'�.;,.,�;,.���:,..'..-:..,...,':-��,'�,-.1--�.l:;..*�..'�1:...'.1��-1-,.*'"....'..':.--,`-,t7l�f'--,i..�....,:�..1.'-i-.",,,!..,..1*.1,�;-,,.,.r,,��,:�tI"-'-,�...-.-1 j.--*,�_f;�;...-i-.�.'-."--.�I..;.,.m--,....--.���:,.�"";i.�,,,,.'-,-�I-.,*,'*.-�....,.,.'.....1...�.-:...'�..-!',,1..,..,-;-."%". ,..�,;,1 r.'..-,:.�,-'.',,,�-lI��-�,"-.'.�,--.,,..-.,4V:...V,`!-'-,,-.v%`--,-...::-.,,,�.-�.i�,'-.�.'�.,,,'.-V,,.....-...I-_-.,-!;:,-i.."......t;,,,-.'..r''-�,,.-,,,-�.�i�.����',.1�--.;'.".",`��,-.�.�.2.--..I�.,,,,�'�,j"S-..,j-.-.,l:.,.v��-�:. .,..-,:1��,-r�F-,.�1r",��..--,...,1--.�l,�!�..�,.r-,--.Z_�,-�;l!',-7,"';�"-,,.-".�'.:�-:i.--�-.'..�-.r.M'-.,..,.�"-;.:,;..,..�...;L,::J,..,*1�l....:...�-,.;�...��.-.:.,.�-.1",.^.!1�-".:,,-;-"."-.'"..�..���-.-1.�,.-�..-`:-',-;.%I,'-1,i��-�....-,�.�:�..:.;�...:.:�%'.:'_.-'-..;,.g.:m'".,.,..�7,.I_.l..��-�lII;��r-.,,"-.-.II.--.i�...'"-�.k.i.�.....�-..;l.-.�N'-`-.'.:-�.�r,.-,X,..,`..-...-,-..,..�1�.-.--%�;:1-*,..t..-::`,P.t.,.-1.::.*':,:�;.'I i1�...v.-'�1,,,,.:.--i.-It 1,7..�.-.`,�.-.-�*��...--,�I.."-g�,.-...'5�v:"-�.k,,,-�,--,.--t-.-*-;;,..-,-.�.-"-�,.'-'I,,I-i;�-,.%,� .��-..-"..,...,,,...1..-.*.-."-:,f�;,�I".',.-..-..�-;1.,�-.�,�....'.r�:..:,..0--�,:.E.:.-:..1�,.�...:I".;..,-..�..I�-...�!.::�,�!-"1.:l�'r;!.;�...-,...-,'--'.��,;...,''.1t,,.... ,.".-i.,.:1,-.-'..,.,.1 i,-.'�::....7�;�.�:��...-,�.-.-'.,.,�-......�I.-..:..,--.�;...�I.-':...:I..----.,..t.t,.:�-...-?.I I".,'�..b.,--..,-.-;-.,I..��m-..;......-.Q:t:.,..,.�--..I-.,�.I�,l:.....,..i:..�':'''....;:..-ft"�-�.".....-�..A���.I7�I.I...,i'.-:I'p--......i-..a.tI,-':.f�-:..e�,.....,:.,-...--:..::d-.:,.�.I..m'..-..'-.-,..:.,.,:'......e..-,-�-.,.,��t.-_.!.r...,,.'".�1...t.',...�..--h",,..,:.�"��1�1-.,..1..W"1.-,:.��".-l..,,I�..1..�..I;,:-.";.-,.,�%..;.%.I:I:.*-d:.:,..,-...��"-;.:'I.;.....:".H.,--.,--�...--1.,:.I,�--.I-`;�,.I�.,�-,.---a,;I--,..'--H.:�.t 1-.--...M�...i,,.1 q...`-:�..'.,,.�.1�.--,..-,.-,..-:�..1-�,.''e-'..-1:41�-.:-,�:-,�....I,,.,,;,�...:-�1'::..t.,,....��1-''Z"--�:t.,.`.!..:-!I-.- .-...m',..1.'-.i...�*I'f..-"...;,�--.!-_�,..*..,�,;..i.,:.",-,',,.:_,�.,.T,-..-.,4i 2,.",-,.-:i.-',',..,.-.,�.:-.-.I..-,,."�,!..,!...*..!,.a%:.-.�",,:'.":.'.-,-�-t',..,.,;�.i..'��.,;.,..�,,�--...',.,,�4.....-,.1.,�..-,,-.:I..--�-..!:.-.:.1:'..."..--...,..t-,,,.�,.-!,!,"..,;.,,.��'.f�--..',...-,.-.i'�.--.-,�-,.,�k-.,,,�-,,�.,:..,:;�.',..,.�:.,;,..-.-' ue' 7 -.`!.,"...,..:--�6.":I..""-:..L.!....!,I.-.��.-,.-m 1..�..�:..-I�..r,L l,-!�-...�-.-!.-,l....,*.`-.--l.i:.,I-.I-1..,.--....,..�"I.�".....-..,�-..:...;�...;...-I,�...�---..:..-,--.:..;_Il.�..�..��I-,...f:.'�,.-'-�r..��.,:..�.."-1,-4,.-.:.-�-...--:'-...'..�,L,-I.-..I-:..I,.:,.�%.,'."..-.�1.:,�.tI�-..,..-...,..::;-.;-.:.:,-..,.-1....:--..""i.l.��.-.._�,:-.1:-i,...,.'�'..�,:...-:,,I.'..�,�-...,;",i.,�-t,:.-",',!..-"I...., ��-r:.,-.-,1...,..".,- ,...-1 I;,....,,7�I�-�.";.;,-..i�:.,.�..-,,%,,,`..I, �...:.:,.".--.-..:'.:.�.4.:,..-.�/..,.--....--�-!-.-!1..,..'I....-%,:.t.-..,�..I...-,..�.-:-'....t-:..�!,%.,,...,i.....-.m"...,...�.;'.I I:-..-"..��......"-..�-.m.r_.,'-...i.;"--�,.,.'...;�.�.--i...:.-..:1.,,,,...-",......,,,,,,,,I--� 1 -..-.�. I...-..��-,1,,i�-�;.--I 1..,-.i,.....-..V.-.I..--.,...1,...:;..�-..iI.,-t,...-.."..:�,..p�::�...%.,-4..-�,.�..,1 ,-..,.:.�.-. .;...,r"�!`..,"�...-..��1.,..,...-.,i2..:..1,�,-.:�,.,.1i,..........---"�,-m .�,:--:jjjj..-.;.":.-` .1-'.:...--,,.'..,-.j.��,,,-.:,.".--:.!..;:':,,-.�."-..-,.:.-".!....,,-,,,,;,m.,,.f�..-..,. :-�..,.�..1.,,..-...�;-..-1..i."..,....:--...-:-.:....�..,i....:..f...�..1.--:�1.�'*...-.I.,.;:*�.......'-.;%.1...:......I 1I....*'-....I-....:..,--v�.......,I"�.,:::i.....I.'-'-..�.t.m..t7i.,t..:"-`.,-'...:......�.-..".�.%..-m'�".-., ;,..:-.".,...,..-:'...:,1.,�.:-,I...,..�-".*..:-...1.-"...::*..,,..�..,,-i-..-I:.,..-....I.......- ;�......-.-..-.:'..I...,-:.�.... .....-.j:,.-�..,�-.�-....-.._...1;-..7.-..-.......%.....�.....,.:-,.-�'........1,,-.:...,.�:��...;-�..,.-I....�-.":.7-...-.�....:1-....;,.......m..,...-,-.,.-.....1:..._.;"?......::,..m..,...........:-.:...::l.�I,...�..'.t��......��......,�.�---.,.-.MI.-..:.....'-..-!.-.,��..,.-.,-:I:�,...,-.,...I...'.- :%.-..,....,t:.r':.:.:,...o�.,1,,� ...j.I.�:..'.�F,.,'!...,....2;.I..-.::"..-'.....A 1�'1.".::;..�..',.:.%..r...-.,.:1;'.::�.--�:I'j.:�:�.;.;,���!.1:.r.'.:-.I;...I:"...-i�:,....:::*�"t.kj.,.,...;.,..;�--,,.-.1�,�Vp,I,..I...:.I,��I�.�.�1..",,.�.--.�:�:--i �:,�`*-.:-.:--�..-,:`.p,;,.,-1"�I tI",:.,.'�,j.l,f-�,,-L I.i!'�..':r,.,.,,_.��-.',-l.-.,r',� ,Ii�',...1.,,r',�-..,":P..i�;,..�.--I,..,.,'...I".�"-".,...,:',....�.:`r,I.-..;,I,;-Ie-.';..;�,,,-..",I�I�.!,:.,��,,"`r..r,�......,,�.I':..r";. ,`�n I!.,.I...---7 e-.!...:,-`.,zI�..C1,.���.i-�,-�.�'.,,.%-�I:,.:,-.,:,-..�;:��.,�;-�-..;,.-,`,;--�.,:',-g.,j;,�..-,�-, ".-�.,.-.,�'?,---','k'-"r�:-.:.r-".-..j.-,!,�.--.-..,�-,:-'-,"I-, ".';.�tr..,-,.:-,"..,*%' �I�."'�.j;:.�"-!:'�.�,�'..- --�,.t-.-......��:'.."�I"t....I'I-...-�-',.,;.t�.,1m',.,.-',"1-�.-,.-:,�-..,� .'.-�,.'11�",,�"1-...�::,'�`.1I;�:�'..t. f 1.�t�1;:,�.I,.',,-"r-r.:l.-,.t��...�,�U I.,,-""�,1....�-.1a�....".:,,1...r.,�.,-,..r�"-,.1..I,,;.-..:1 T�..,..1.,.,..',..1�.I--..7.�''".'1.:.m.-.:.............:::..!.:...-:l,..'.,-'.,l,-,."��.,..mi.".� 1a,,.,..�,I..I.-.�-.�,._.�:.Ir,.;'.,C-.l;,-.,...-.- -�,.1::�,.i:-.,..�,,.'m,1.'S Z,.,,,..,r.�'..-.::,...r.:I,. ,�..,.1,-..,---.....,.-"--.,;.-.-,j-r�,.r,,,.�..--:.,1.,,-'.�Z,�,....�.:-�I,-.�.....!�:�,t,�-:�. �,.Z..-,��..LL��.",�',j.�-,1 I-..,,,.-;,,-".�.,.1.I-,,.,..-..�-,�-1.".l.'j�..�..�,,:..,,-:.:,..,-1.Z.,I,,--..;.�;,.�,....,I'-,.,!'_;..,.:-!'..:,.,.:2l.,,",...".�:...-.,.,'."�I,�-.l�i,%-,-.�:.-:.....r,-..-�.1".'I'�'��..11t...-...l�':,I".�.,,�"�.%.".l..I�:,�-�..,..,.: -.�,-:.1`,"-''--I:0";.--,.,..�.,.%1,:.,. ;,,,,-..t'.�'���...--.,�"�L:..-!"-'.',j.,,�;--, :-,.,r,--�I'..J j'-.,1.���,_ll.:-,-:..1. -t.`. U N '.."�.:.,I..--1 y,..,,. I-.,.-:.;.''"-.y1 i-:;1�-.;.',"o�..�,,�-:�,.��r-�`�.L,-:�, .:"".....,-��N --.�"-: 1I,.�-9,,�.'�*,-",�: .,. 1 } :--,,:,-.,..i,..,..�:,,...�.-I..i".,,l.-".,.';�...,,-,.-,'r.-:.��-,?�,.-.-:L�.`--.�r�-..,-.,-rI�-1�,.�...�.:1--r^,:,'-,- ,..T.1,,,N!.:1%`�l�r"....,,�,,.".;.:1.���,,��",,-,,..�._.I7,S�-�It""�--',j-,'��:."-..,-:..,:.,.,..-�.t%..,-,�..".-.I.I"".�:.!�..5�.i,';.�_---:.�-�).,�.I'",.:.:::::1.i jl-l..'�f:i,,,::t:.1-.;-.'�'..�I.�1.-.,,...7:'-�-.-.,.-�.. -,.,-��..,.�".,,.,.�:�'-,�.,..- ,.,....I.;-p,I,.2:1�,.1,,-,-:,Ir-.1...I.i:4)��.".1"-,�.,t I.�-,-�.,.�,-II,,:r..-.,..,,�-.�',..,.-,.."��I'�:�.'�.-. ,..�,..,.��.:Y-�,.:,-�,:,1I �"- :,��..�; �,,,...�-,-,. .I 4.-��,:.-�::.�,,. :�.�,����l.R�zr`...1�.-r�:; e..'.`.1.,I,,",t�A,,��'",,.1,�.,,-�,I�'-1":i,.".-� �,"j,'1.,"..1,�t�..�I%.."--,..,�I.J5,1,-.-,�:.,,�i.��.�,-:..-..,� .�i.,,l L-!,,.�..",.�',�I.:,I A."4�-"�_� .-;.,,....,,�1,",..-: ,��� A -a--Y.'' C - :.? 1 i '(1 .'p�.: J f,. , ff h Y ,, _ 1- ,.1 Y� F ,.,T :" o •4 a ,:�` ka-. c C i -h1. 7 WY rr y ', V" "l,'.,;,1S--�,�-eil; -,-...:..*.:--,,, R.Y 1, I MQ \. +l e. V, .5., :J S _4. T.T. �- I..-��N5-'l-1'�.*.,.t."., P t.. �' d `3J. I t l 'Y 'y �.1hr ,r �,3;CJ�` -�♦_ z .,IV"1.I..n..,.�,.,.-I-�"�!'-�,.,, r, I".u,.,"..�,�; ;.,,,..�,1,-,,,�I-1:!--��j,-.--_�,,,,.g�,�,*"'.'.,,.1.1 ...�"-,�.,'.I"-,.�'*'-,5"',,`I-:,.t-fr-'-,'I,S .--:,..,,:'r:'r-,"*-�1'",,li ";.:7,"A,lJ -�,",�,.I.w�,,.tr%..`,....('r. l,�,:.-..4;-l�'� -�.,,:,.t.,-rf.,-..:,�,-,,�-,��:.j�::::::I'.t,I I-;P--,;,�&.R...K,.�' ��:�.-...-.g.. I 1,. 1.- 1-;.fib ,�l f 4 ,.2 -�. .d( }',- a -o 'r ,kr 1•t,. ,1 .!lu J - P ,M T 4,S -1 3 .k '!•a'n b'd^ -[r q:,,.0 - .; .M..q. rrr gg ion.:: 5 a u v ,,.1 >':. 5, i kr.- 'rl '^5 .'Gt� ae,d',7 y :aa i **�� - Y +f. 4 '4• :�� f �' 1. T. w• ..\- I, 3" 4 .,�-.." ..!,.::.� ..,i�-, .: .., :i.... ., - ,�,,�I- ,.4.. :-..^ar y5-. s� .u; _y•. '.C \l,,,' yY. .7�.._.. , �'1 _,'(: t -. ',;. S.-`-i h ), -:r%_- ,d-. ..�, r i - x '0....sr :3 r,`-4, 4N%,€' _1'- (i _ �` { „-`1 r id `.+.. r!h ^•h,i � J> d� -d•v+.. .e,rf: hr.. 4 s ,1 1' S: k" ��. w.�F .hl "' x. -.'�. ^ .; +, t '- - r ] i i -vl-. •.� 5 b P ,s'-,n t z g•'- .,_. .. 4.. . j7:..: Yy C y_,. -;,,.. , -.�. :i C.". `� l3 .,Y t ';'ZG LI O.N 1 DLEVA`TfQN S D .ELE �4 t t ; Q" 1 J, 4 ,6.,Y. 'fit+i r.� at.i.. h• .fI r .J 8� S� 11,1 -fy., c J ai • . :,... ", r y a ! # ty. 1 t y s2.c3 i' � k r. , 4 } ',, 1 t 11- .i� 5 } . ,... I`. 6 i i .1 . i 17G1 q e l „P` F �.y w.r .d �' V -? - { 1, $ t.. 4 i.1{ LA.� Q o A~ r 1' [['��t•-kl, it %s I 7 l 1 3 i.(:y yV .b.. -k .i: , , ;t• s- ,'w; a,, f,:, �^: -do-; A r - ,1 J F i.'F✓. Ft Jy �: ) 7r_, },_ � JL. .{. T (f ,.f .:µ' 1 !,_. ..+ - ,y :1.' -R �,.( }M1n ! 3 r.. S :' i .7S' /.. if +: i :, _a'r g �' r d Q` . s, h ) r y.:.y rs., •q 3 ,,fir r, ; ;;, 'St.: ' ;}r� r' _i` ,.. (, 11 ., C5 �1,_. -:3,b i' 1 :4 tY r...: ...-.-r .f .. �. )4 1 -t ,'\rYl^Z' .V, +1':{JJ 1���' -t ♦l •i, r _:- t ''.:i � r` l -f: 1. � ��C��SS.:�4'i , - .v..}y, +..."Ai pt r 9• _ .f C' ttrFF{'��}•�y.,:tt^--•rr I�•^��S �r'r'^ //ram. E r alT.,+. A: 1 a x,. {, i.J � I":VL�1\,� 4 L�:iV , ATI ! F `n Y�'. k '�:_Li.fib w. -'rp,,A'i .M. S ',j• r • ,,, y. \ Y- :1PN�.y. - k_ �. 3-> W I -y ! .t,:•, 1 ! I- Y f ^` 4. h t l'' T ): ,. ..�: d. .x tag y, a :1 rnwt t?': rr 7 .v '!. C. ., Tt t r. r; 4 -T u l r7 -1 - -.:•+ ,r ' `. •i '' •I, x tr - :•7 - ntayL` -..s:2- r%i ..s, a'$.,. i.J..er kr,X. 4 ;A Jk^ L 1 •r-G .1 r_ $ is S- i of T' ;� n- y•y 4 r+s ' S _ s n-f s. :t..... 'h£: .k.,,f:°.U' �.Y 'i t „U. _-I £t r.. ,.•f, -4a ,yS... ,l• 1"- .`- fi 7- t a , ,a d :sP N•. it - R n •1 -4 -O,:.i,, F '^$.i •''>�' �t'� l' 1-'�:5;. f.t `l.. -.R.L. ,�.. - .FA`? r• a :� 5, r 4'J� zk., k� :wcl' :u,r-: '�L .:,�,1 ,a.• h , 4 4, a .v. is � .s•t .. - .'6,,�.11dA.•,:.S; k-'•:`:,..":5<t; ,tr.:<r'f , r?. ..;-',r,:�'ti_,. a. .!'" .r r4 _ .n", 1 �. -t } f% ,.4' S. $" :.':A .'S.•. h 5 ':1;.`" eYj_�" Ft.• -L .sG 2 4' uy, ;. 'ei' ,!. {_ -JS.a ,.l<.ur. .19. .i]".sYflT'I,P." G•: { :o„{. a r.!N ai•' ^.a,u -_a•. L-.-,:1•.. .t. ✓ S: "M r�" 1. .ri: _ w -:Y .s.n •4i !J,. ,3"^ :a .,;7':�fi,. " , _[ t..e{ .t�f £ me o„ r �..q- r_ { y. n:G. IL ✓r.r Ya•- alnr..tiror,' Es:, x.}' b r:r i-.r r a z a, �.,' b.; •n.... ,+ .>•.. -i. ,f t c a. 'l"a. 1 r W,�1, .>,..._.tsr'..r :a. -;-. �:a .. ...Y �.. . t I' ;,'-, 4 mr •<n.,: J y .,_,.-. :; f' ,a„7u, .., r._.r_,_,..:,,.-.. .� .., ;...,i i.,...,?1. :..,.,? _.. :is'„a•...{.._-F.,'A..$-.t$:^ein.U'3.i!{ .�ir�i rrw�v.5`a..+ +a, +.. ris,� 'ia -id_, :7s..J""'`�a. VLsi' i.. Yr.::w�iv:. ':cr.:. .•,i:l,wda:++ +C,-.3 a-.,.d,.'A,r�lf nk'.'1:u�,7S:. .rm a,...�ia.�n ..N�a{c. ,}1 ,.: n a :.1„