Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND COMPACTION TEST RESULTS - I 2002-01 •Soil Engineering and Consulting Services•Engineering Geology•Compaction Testing —— -- EnGEN Corporation •Inspections•CWaterRiso Materials Testing•LaI&11 n Testing•Percolation Testing •Geology•Water Resource Studies •Phase I&II Environmental Site Assessments ENVIRONMENTAL & GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING NETWORK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE RECEIVED F JAN 2 2 2003 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND COMPACTION TEST RESULTS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT I ROUGH GRADING OPERATIONS Vertigo Corporate Complex Parcel Map 30680 FCereal Street and Corydon Street City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside, California Project Number: T2544-C December 26, 2002 17 f I f L Prepared for: L Alesco Development Company, LLC 21021 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 301 Woodland Hills, California 91364 -..4��rrrrr���a•i� �rr��wrr�i�srrrr� q�rirrMeglrit■■t■ra:ra�rs�a■��riCri�,tar��nsQ/�EwwRR� CORP'O ATE OFFICE 41607.Enterprise Circle Nort,,Suite 1,Temecula,CA 92590•phone: (909) 296-2230•fax: (909) 296-2237 = -� ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE 2615 Orange Ave h ue,Santa Ana,CA 92707 •phone:(714) 546-4051 • fax: (714)546-4052 \V B SITE: www.enoe corp.com • E-MAIL' engencorp@engencorp.com Alesco Development Company, LLC Project Number:T2544-C TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION NUMBER AND TITLE PAGE 1.0 SITE/PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION......................................................................1 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION ..........................................................................................................1 1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................2 1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.....................................................................................................2 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK..............................................................................................................2 2.1 TIME OF GRADING .............................................................................................................2 2.2 CONTRACTOR AND EQUIPMENT..........................................................................................2 2.3 GRADING OPERATIONS......................................................................................................2 3.0 TESTING...........................................................................................................................3 3.1 FIELD TESTING PROCEDURES ............................................................................................3 3.2 LABORATORY TESTING ......................................................................................................3 3.2.1 MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP TEST....................................................3 3.2.2 EXPANSION INDEX TEST.............................................................................3 3.2.3 SOLUBLE SULFATE TEST ............................................................................4 4.0 EARTH MATERIALS ...........................................................................................................4 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................4 6.0 CLOSURE .........................................................................................................................5 APPENDIX: TEST RESULTS DRAWINGS EnGEN Corporation r •Soil Engineering and Consulting Services•Engineering Geology•Compaction Testing EnGEN corporation •Inspections•Construction Resource Studies •Laboratory Testing•Percolation Testing •Geology•Water Resource Studies •Phase I&II Environmental Site Assessments ENVIRONMENTAL & GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING NETWORK December 26, 2002 Alesco Development Company, LLC 21021 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 301 Woodland Hills, California 91364 (818) 883-9665 / FAX(818) 883-9699 Attention: Mr. Jeff Sanner Regarding: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND COMPACTION TEST RESULTS ROUGH GRADING OPERATIONS Vertigo Corporate Complex Parcel Map 30680 Cereal Street and Corydon Street City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside, California Project Number: T2544-C References: 1- EnGEN Corporation, Geotechnical/Geological Engineering Study, Vertigo Corporate Complex, 12 Acres at the Northeast Corner of Cereal Street and Corydon Street, City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside, California, Project Number: T2544-GS, report dated June 27, 2002. 2. Jensen & Associates, Precise Grading Plan, Parcel Map 30680, City of Lake Elsinore, plans dated September 5, 2002. Dear Mr. Sanner: In accordance with your request and signed authorization, EnGEN Corporation has performed field observations, sampling, and in-place density testing at the above referenced site. Submitted, herein, are the test results and the supporting field and laboratory data. 1.0 SITE/PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION The subject site consists of approximately 6-acres, located on the northern corner of Cereal Street and Corydon Street, in the City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside, California. CORPORATE OFFICE 41607E iterprise Circle North,Suite 1,Temecula,CA 92590•phone: (909)296-2230•fax: (909)296-2237 ORANGE COUNTY OFF14E 2615 Orange Avenue,Santa Ana,CA 92707 •phone:(714)546-4051 •fax:(714)546-4052 VVdb SITE: www.encjcr)corp.com • E-MAIL: engencorp@engencorp.com Alesco Development Company, LLC Project Number: T2544-C December 2002 Page 2 1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION Prior to grading operations, topography and surface conditions of the site were relatively flat with surface drainage to the northwest at a gradient of less than two percent. 1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION It is understood that the subject site is to be developed with four (4) commercial/industrial type structures with slab-on-grade concrete floors supported on conventional continuous and pier footings, with associated driveway as well as hardscape and landscape improvements. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK 2.1 TIME OF GRADING This report represents geotechnical observations and testing during the construction operations from November 13, 2002 through December 17, 2002. 2.2 CONTRACTOR AND EQUIPMENT The grading operations were performed by Lewis Valley Contractors through the use of one (1) CAT 623 scraper, one (1) CAT D4 dozer, one (1) CAT D6 dozer, one (1) CAT 12G motor grader, one (1) vibratory sheepsfoot roller, and one (1) water truck. 2.3 GRADING OPERATIONS Grading within the subject site consisted of an overexcavation and replacement operation as well as a cut/fill operation. Grasses and weeds were removed prior to fill placement. Fill material was generated from the parking lot and driveway portions of the site, and used to bring the building pad portions of the site to finish grade elevation. Overexcavated earth material was stockpiled and later used as fill. Bottoms were observed, probed and found to be into competent alluvial soil by a representative of this firm. The alluvial material is considered competent based on the removals extending to the elevations recommended in the Referenced No. 1 Geotechnical Study as well as the materials having undisturbed densities greater than 85 percent relative compaction. The perimeter footing areas as well as the shear wall footing areas of the proposed structures were overexcavated to a depth of eight (8) feet below original grade elevation and to a minimum horizontal distance of twelve (12) feet, centered on the footing. The remainder of the building footprint areas were overexcavated to a depth of three (3) feet below original grades. The hardscape areas were overexcavated to a minimum depth of two (2) feet below proposed grades. EnGEN Corporation Alesco Development Company, LLC Project Number: T2544-C December 2002 Page 3 The exposed bottoms were scarified and moisture conditioned to a depth of 12-inches then compacted to 90 percent. Fill was placed in lens thicknesses of 6 to 8-inches, thoroughly moisture conditioned to near optimum moisture content, then compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. Moisture conditioning of the on-site soils was performed during the compaction process through the use of a water truck. The pad areas were generally graded to the elevations noted on the Grading Plan. However, the actual pad locations, dimensions, elevations, slope locations and inclinations, etc. were surveyed and staked by others and should be verified by the Project Civil Engineer. 3.0 TESTING 3.1 FIELD TESTING PROCEDURES Field in-place density and moisture content testing were performed in general accordance with ASTM D 2922-96 and ASTM D 3017-96 procedures for determining in-place density and moisture content, respectively, using nuclear gauge equipment. Relative compaction test results were within the 90 percent required for all material tested, which is an indication that the remainder of the fill placed has been properly compacted. Test results are presented in the Appendix of this report. Fill depths and test locations were determined from review of the referenced grading plans. 3.2 LABORATORY TESTING The following laboratory tests were performed as part of our services during the grading of the subject site. The test results are presented in the Appendix of this report. 3.2.1 MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP TEST Maximum dry density - optimum moisture content relationship tests were conducted on samples of the materials used as fill. The tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM D 1557-91 (1998) procedures. The test results are presented in the Appendix (Summary of Optimum Moisture Content/Maximum Dry Density Relationship Test Results). 3.2.2 EXPANSION INDEX TEST Three (3) soil samples were obtained for expansion potential testing from the building pad area upon completion of rough grading of the subject site. The expansion test was performed in accordance with ASTM D 4829-95. The materials tested consisted of brown silty sands which have Expansion Indexes of 2 to 6. These soils are classified as having a EnGEN Corporation Alesco Development Company, LLC Project Number:T2544-C December 2002 Page 4 very low expansion potential. The results are presented in the Appendix (Summary of Expansion Index Test Results). 3.2.3 SOLUBLE SULFATE TEST Based on this firm's familiarity with the soils used to construct the building pad, it is our opinion that soluble sulfates are not a concern. As a result, normal Type II cement can be used in concrete making contact with the native soils. 4.0 EARTH MATERIALS The natural earth materials encountered on-site generally consisted of brown silty sand. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS No conditions were encountered which would cause a change in the previously provided design and construction recommendations. As a result, design and construction should adhere to the recommendations provided in the Referenced No. 1 Geotechnical Study. Based on the observations and tests performed during grading, the subject site, in the areas noted as test locations, has been completed in accordance with the Referenced No. 1 Geotechnical Study, the project plans, and the Grading Code of the City of Lake Elsinore. The graded site, in the areas noted as graded, is determined to be adequate for the support of a typical commercial/industrial development. Any subsequent grading for development of the subject property should be performed under engineering observation and testing performed by EnGEN Corporation. Subsequent grading includes, but is not limited to, any additional fill placement and excavation of temporary and permanent cut and fill slopes. In addition, EnGEN Corporation should observe all foundation excavations. Observations should be made prior to installation of concrete forms and/or reinforcing steel so as to verify and/or modify, if necessary, the conclusions and recommendations in this report. Observations of overexcavation cuts, fill placement, finish grading, utility or other trench backfill, pavement subgrade and base course, retaining wall backfill, slab presaturation, or other earth work completed for the development of the subject site should be performed by EnGEN Corporation. If any of the observations and testing to verify site geotechnical conditions are not performed by EnGEN Corporation, liability for the safety and performance of the development is limited to the actual portions of the project observed and/or tested by EnGEN Corporation. I EnGEN Corporation l Alesco Development Company, LLC Project Number: T2544-C December 2002 Page 5 6.0 CLOSURE This report has been prepared for use by the parties or project named or described above. It may or may not contain sufficient information for other parties or purposes. The findings and recommendations expressed in this report are based on field and laboratory testing performed during the rough grading operation and on generally accepted engineering practices and principles. No further warranties are implied or expressed beyond the direct representations of this report. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services. If you should have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact this office at your convenience. Respectfully submitted, EnGEN Corporation J449'u ram) S. Ryan Waroff Osbjor rat e, GE 162 Field Operations Assistant Presi efit Ex p es 09-30-05 SRW/OB:hh �U� SS/ �f_, Distribution: (2) Addressee (2) Attention: Mr. Neal Stevens t No. 162 FILE: EnGEN/Reporting/C/T2544-C Alesco Development,Rough Grading 1 EnGEN Corporation r Alesco Development Company, LLC I Project Number:T2544-C Appendix Page 1 F F F APPENDIX: r TEST RESULTS f� I I _ I I L Ir L L L EnGEN Corporation Alesco Development Company, LLC Project Number:T2544-C Appendix Page 2 FIELD TEST RESULTS (Summary of Field In-Place Density Test Results) (Nuclear Gauge Test Method) (S.G.) = Subgrade/(F.G.) =Finish Grade Test :(2002]) Depth Soil Max Moisture Dry Relative Required No Test Locations Elevation Type Density Content Density Compaction Compaction (FT) yp (PCF) (%) (PCF) (%) (%) A 11-13 Building Pad 1 -Bottom 1262 Al 132.2 6.5 115.1 87.1% 85.0% Pg 11-13 Building Pad 1 -Bottom 1262 Al 132.2 7.6 114.6 86.7% 85.0% C 11-13 Building Pad 1 -Bottom 1262 Al 132.2 7.1 113.1 85.6% 85.0% D 11-13 Building Pad 1 -Bottom 1263 Al 132.2 6.8 113.9 86.2% 85.0% E 11-14 Building Pad 1 -Bottom 1263 Al 132.2 7.6 113.0 85.5% 85.0% F 11-14 Building Pad 1 -Bottom 1263 Al 132.2 6.7 112.6 85.2% 85.0% G 11-14 Building Pad 1 -Footing Bottom 1257 A2 133.6 12.3 117.2 87.7% 85.0% 1 11-14 Building Pad 1 1262 A2 133.6 9.8 121.1 90.6% 90.0% 2 11-14 Building Pad 1 1262 A2 133.6 7.6 122.4 91.6% 90.0% 3 11-14 Building Pad 1 1263 A2 133.6 8.3 120.9 90.5% 90.0% 4 11-14 Building Pad 1 -Footing Bottom 1257 A2 133.6 12.1 122.6 91.8% 90.0% H 11-15 Building Pad 1 -Footing Bottom 1257 A2 133.6 11 1 117.2 87.7% 85.0% 1 11-15 Building Pad 1 -Footing Bottom 1257 A2 133.6 9.6 114.8 85.9% 85.0% 5 11-15 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1259 A2 133.6 10.1 122.9 92.0% 90,0% 6 11-15 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1259 A2 133.6 9.6 123.6 92.5% 90.0% 7 11-15 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1261 A2 133.6 9.9 123.1 92.1% 90.0% j 11-18 Building Pad 1 -Footing Bottom 1258 A2 133.6 6.7 117.1 87.6% 85.0% 8 11-18 Building Pad 1 1264 Al 132.2 9.0 119.1 90.1% 90.0% 9 11-18 Building Pad 1 1265 Al 132.2 10.1 120.1 90.8% 90.0% 10 11-18 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1262 Al 132.2 9.0 115.0 87.0% 90.0% 11 11-18 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1259 Al 132.2 10.0 117.0 88.5% 90.0% 12 11-18 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1260 Al 132.2 9.0 115.6 87.4% 90.0% 13 11-18 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1261 Al 132.2 8.6 120,2 90.9% 90.0% 14 11-18 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1263 Al 132.2 9.4 120.5 91.1% 90.0% 15 11-19 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1263 Al 132.2 11.2 119.5 90.4% 90.0% 16 11-19 Retest#11 1259 Al 132.2 10.2 120.3 91.0% 90.0% 17 11-19 Retest#12 1260 Al 132.2 9.7 119.7 90.5% 90.0% 18 11-19 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1263 Al 132.2 11.0 120.6 91.2% 90.0% 19 11-19 Retest#10 1262 Al 132.2 9.7 119.7 90.5% 90.0% K 11-19 Building Pad A-Bottom 1263 Al 132.2 8.7 117.4 88.8% N/A L 11-19 Building Pad A-Bottom 1263 Al 132.2 9.1 113.5 85.9% N/A EnGEN Corporation Alesco Development Company, LLC Project Number: T2544-C Appendix Page 3 FIELD TEST RESULTS (Summary of Field In-Place Density Test Results) (Nuclear Gauge Test Method) (S.G.) = Subgrade/(F G.) =Finish Grade Test Test Depth Soil Max Moisture Dry Relative Required No. Date Test Locations Elevation Type Density Content Density Compaction Compaction (2002) (FT) yp (PCF) (%) (PCF) (%) (%) 20 11-20 Building Pad 1 1265 Al 132.2 10.0 120.9 91.5% 90.0% 21 11-20 Building Pad 1 1265 Al 132.2 11.0 121.2 91.7% 90.0% 22 11720 Building Pad 1 1265 Al 132.2 12.1 120.8 91.4% 90.0% 23 11-20 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1263 Al 132.2 12.8 123.1 93.1% 90.0% 24 11-20 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1263 Al 132.2 11 6 120.7 91.3% 90.0% 25 11-20 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1265 Al 132.2 11.2 121.1 91.6% 90.0% M 11-20 Building Pad A-Footing Bottom 1258 Al 132.2 10.0 113.0 85.5% 85.0% N 11-20 Building Pad A-Footing Bottom 1259 Al 132.2 16.2 114.2 86.4% 85.0% p 11-20 Building Pad A-Footing Bottom 1259 Al 132.2 14.9 113.0 85.5% 85.0% p 11-20 Building Pad A-Footing Bottom 1259 Al 132.2 14.7 113.7 86.0% 85.0% Q 11-21 Building Pad A-Footing Bottom 1259 Al 132.2 6.7 117.9 89.2% 85.0% R 11-21 Building Pad A-Footing Bottom 1259 Al 132.2 19.2 118.2 89.4% 85.0% g 11-21 Building Pad A-Footing Bottom 1259 Al 132.2 17.8 117.E 89.0% 85.0% 26 11-21 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1261 Al 132.2 8.3 115.7 87.5% 90.0% 27 11-21 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1260 Al 132.2 7.9 117.1 88.6% 90.0% 28 11-21 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1261 Al 132.2 10.1 115.2 87.1% 90.0% 29 11-21 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1261 Al 132.2 8.7 117.2 88.7% 90.0% 30 11-21 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1261 Al 132.2 15.1 115.9 87.7% 90.0% 31 11-21 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1261 Al 132.2 10.9 117.0 88.5% 90.0% 32 11-21 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1261 Al 132.2 8.1 118.9 89.9% 90.0% 33 11-22 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1261 Al 132.2 7.9 119.2 90.2% 90.0% 34 11-22 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1263 Al 132.2 7.3 119.6 90.5% 90.0% 35 11-22 Retest#26 1261 Al 132.2 8.5 120.3 91.0% 90.0% 36 11-22 Retest#27 1261 Al 132.2 8.3 119.2 90.2% 90.0% 37 11-22 Retest#28 1261 Al 132.2 7.1 119.9 90.7% 90.0% 38 11-22 Retest#29 1261 Al 132.2 6.7 119.1 90.1% 90.0% 39 11-22 Retest#30 1261 Al 132.2 7.3 120.2 90.9% 90.0% 40 11-22 Retest#31 1261 Al 132.2 7.1 119.4 90.3% 90.0% 41 11-22 Retest#32 1261 Al 132.2 6.7 120.6 91.2% 90.0% 42 11-22 Building Pad 1 F.G. Al 132.2 10.9 119.0 90.0% 90.0% 43 11-22 Building Pad 1 F.G. Al 132.2 10.0 122.1 92.4% 90.0% EnGEN CorporaCion Alesco Development Company, LLC Project Number: T2544-C Appendix Page 4 FIELD TEST RESULTS (Summary of Field In-Place Density Test Results) (Nuclear Gauge Test Method) (S.G.) = Subgrade/(F.G.) =Finish Grade Test :(2002]) Depth Soil Max Moisture Dry Relative Required No. Test Locations Elevation Type Density Content Density Compaction Compaction (FT) Yp (PCF) (%) (PCF) (%) (%) 44 11-22 Building Pad 1 F.G. Al 132.2 7.9 123.1 93.1% 90.0% 45 11-22 Building Pad 1 F.G. Al 132.2 8.3 119.1 90.1% 90.0% 46 11-22 Building Pad 1 F.G. Al 132.2 8.4 123.1 93.1% 90.0% T 11-22 Building Pad B-Bottom 1262 Al 132.2 7.9 114.0 86.2% 85.0% U 11-22 Building Pad B-Bottom 1262 Al 132.2 5.9 112.7 85.2% 85.0% V 11-22 Building Pad B-Bottom 1262 Al 132.2 6.3 116.0 87.7% 85.0% 47 11-22 Building Pad B-Footing 1263 Al 132.2 9.1 119.2 90.2% 90.0% 48 11-22 Building Pad B-Footing 1263 Al 132.2 10.2 120.1 90.8% 90.0% 49 11-22 Building Pad B-Footing 1263 Al 132.2 8.7 119.5 90.4% 90.0% 50 11-22 Building Pad B-Footing 1263 Al 132.2 10.1 120.0 90.8% 90.0% 51 11-22 Building Pad B-Footing 1263 Al 132.2 10.8 119.7 90.5% 90.0% W 11-25 Building Pad B-Footing Bottom 1259 Al 132.2 9.5 125.3 94.8% 85.0% X 11-25 Building Pad B-Footing Bottom 1259 Al 132.2 13.1 113.4 85.8% 85.0% y 11-25 Building Pad B-Footing Bottom 1259 Al 132.2 7.5 123.6 93.5% 85.0% Z 11-25 Building Pad B-Footing Bottom 1259 Al 132.2 6.0 123.0 93.0% 85.0% 52 11-25 Building Pad A 1265 Al 132.2 9.1 120.2 90.9% 90.0% 53 11-25 Building Pad A 1265 Al 132.2 9.8 1205. 91.1% 90.0% 54 11-25 Building Pad A 1265 Al 132.2 8.7 121.3 91.8% 90.0% Al 11-25 Building Pad B-Footing Bottom 1258 Al 132.2 6.9 127.7 96.6% 85.0% 55 11-25 Building Pad A 1265 Al 132.2 9.0 120.6 91.2% 90.0% 56 11-25 Building Pad A 1265 Al 132.2 7.9 119.6 90.5% 90.0% B1 11-25 Building Pad B-Footing Bottom 1259 Al 132.2 14.1 112.9 85.4% 85.0% C1 11-26 Building Pad B-Footing Bottom 1259 Al 132.2 13.4 112.E 85.2% 85.0% D1 11-26 Building Pad B-Footing Bottom 1259 Al 132.2 11.5 117.1 88.6% 85.0% 57 11-27 Building Pad B-Footing 1261 Al 132.2 9.1 117.1 88.6% 90.0% 58 11-27 Building Pad B-Footing 1261 Al 132.2 10.5 114.6 86.7% 90.0% 59 11-27 Building Pad B-Footing 1261 Al 132.2 10.0 116.7 88.3% 90.0% 60 11-27 Building Pad B-Footing 1261 Al 132.2 8.9 1144 86.5% 90.0% 61 11-27 Building Pad B-Footing 1261 Al 132.2 9.3 119.1 90.1% 90.0% 11-27 Building Pad B-Footing 1261 Al 132.2 10.1 119.4 90.3% 90.0% F3 11-27 Retest#57 1261 Al 132.2 8.5 119.8 90.6% 90.0% EnGEN Corporation Alesco Development Company, LLC Project Number:T2544-C Appendix Page 5 FIELD TEST RESULTS (Summary of Field In-Place Density Test Results) (Nuclear Gauge Test Method) (S G.) = Subgrade/(F.G.) =Finish Grade Test Test Depth Soil Max Moisture Dry Relative Required No. Date Test Locations Elevation Density Content Density Compaction Compaction (2002) (FT) Type (PCF) (%) (PCF) (%) (%) 64 11-27 Retest#58 1261 Al 132.2 10.2 120.4 91.1% 90.0% 65 11-27 Retest#59 1261 Al 132.2 13.1 120.0 90.8% 90.0% 66 11-27 Retest#60 1261 Al 132.2 11.5 120.6 91.2% 90.0% 67 11-27 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1263 Al 132.2 8.9 119.6 90.5% 90.0% 68 11-27 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1263 Al 132.2 10.2 119.2 90.2% 90.0% 69 11-27 Building Pad 1 -Footing 1263 Al 132.2 9.4 120.3 91.0% 90.0% 70 12-02 Building Pad B-Footing 1263 Al 132.2 10.7 118.9 90.0% 90.0% 71 12-02 Building Pad B-Footing 1263 Al 132.2 10.2 119.1 90.1% 90.0% 72 12-02 Building Pad B-Footing 1263 Al 132.2 9.1 121.6 92.0% 90.0% 73 12-02 Building Pad B-Footing 1263 Al 132.2 9.9 122.5 92.7% 90.0% 74 12-02 Building Pad B-Footing 1263 Al 132.2 10.9 119.5 90.4% 90.0% 75 12-02 Building Pad B-Footing 1263 Al 132.2 9.8 119.2 90.2% 90.0% E1 12-02 Building Pad C-Footing Bottom 1259 Al 132.2 8.9 113.3 85.7% 85.0% F1 12-02 Building Pad C-Footing Bottom 1259 Al 132.2 11.3 118.5 89.6% 85.0% G1 12-02 Building Pad C-Footing Bottom 1259 Al 132.2 10.7 118.2 89.4% 85.0% H1 12-02 Building Pad C-Footing Bottom 1259 Al 132.2 3.8 112.6 85.2% 85.0% 76 12-04 Building Pad B 1265 Al 132.2 10.6 124.0 93.8% 90.0% 77 12-04 Building Pad B 1265 Al 132.2 10.1 121.0 91.5% 90.0% 78 12-04 Building Pad B 1265 Al 132.2 10.7 124.0 93.8% 90.0% 79 12-04 Building Pad B 1265 Al 132.2 10.0 1196 90.5% 90.0% 80 12-05 Building Pad C-Footing 1261 Al 132.2 9.5 122.0 92.3% 90.0% 81 12-05 Building Pad C-Footing 1261 Al 132.2 10.6 120.4 91.1% 90.0% 82 12-05 Building Pad C-Footing 1261 Al 132.2 10.2 123.3 93.3% 90.0% 83 12-05 Building Pad C-Footing 1261 Al 132.2 11.3 121.8 92.1% 90.0% 84 12-05 Building Pad C-Footing 1261 Al 132.2 8.8 121.4 91.8% 90.0% 85 12-05 Building Pad C-Footing 1261 Al 132.2 7.9 123.1 93.1% 90.0% 86 12-06 Building Pad C-Footing 1263 Al 132.2 10.7 122.0 92.3% 90.0% 87 12-06 Building Pad C-Footing 1263 Al 132.2 10.2 120.4 91.1% 90.0% 88 12-06 Building Pad C-Footing 1263 Al 132.2 10.0 123.1 93.1% 90.0% 89 12-06 Building Pad C-Footing 1263 Al 132.2 9.5 113.4 85.8% 90.0% 90 12-06 Retest#89 1263 Al 132.2 8.9 120.1 90.8% 90.0% EnGEN Corporation Alesco Development Company, LLC Project Number: T2544-C Appendix Page 6 FIELD TEST RESULTS (Summary of Field In-Place Density Test Results) (Nuclear Gauge Test Method) (S.G.) = Subgrade/(F.G.) = Finish Grade Test Test Depth Soil Max Moisture Dry Relative Required No. Date Test Locations Elevation Type Density Content Density Compaction Compaction (2002) (FT) yp (PCF) (%) (PCF) (%) (%) 91 12-06 Building Pad C-Footing 1263 Al 132.2 11.1 121.4 91.8% 90.0% 92 12-06 Building Pad C-Footing 1263 Al 132.2 105 121.6 92.0% 90.0% 93 12-09 Building Pad C-Footing 1265 Al 132.2 10.1 119.E 90.5% 90.0% 94 12-09 Building Pad C-Footing 1265 Al 132.2 10.5 120.0 90.8% 90.0% 95 12-09 Building Pad C-Footing 1265 Al 132.2 9.7 119.1 90.1% 90.0% 96 12-09 Building Pad C-Footing 1265 Al 132.2 10.2 119.4 90.3% 90.0% 97 12-09 Building Pad C-Footing 1265 Al 132.2 10.0 119.0 90.0% 90.0% 98 12-09 Building Pad C-Footing 1265 Al 132.2 10.7 119.9 90.7% 90.0% 99 12-11 Building Pad A F.G. Al 132.2 6.0 121.5 91.9% 90.0% 100 12-11 Building Pad A F.G. Al 132.2 6.5 119.2 90.2% 90.0% 101 12-11 Building Pad A F.G. Al 132.2 7.2 120.4 91.1% 90.0% 102 12-11 Building Pad B F.G. Al 132.2 6.9 121.8 92.1% 90.0% 103 12-11 Building Pad B F.G. Al 132.2 6.1 120.3 91.0% 90.0% 104 12-11 Building Pad B F.G. Al 132.2 6.4 121.2 91.7% 90.0% 105 12-12 Building Pad C F.G. Al 132.2 8.7 120.4 91.1% 90.0% 106 12-12 Building Pad C F.G. Al 132.2 9.3 12&0 90.8% 90.0% 107 12-12 Building Pad C F.G. Al 132.2 7.9 121.8 92.1% 90.0% 108 12-12 Parking/Driveway F.G. Al 132.2 9.0 120.2 90.9% 90.0% 109 12-12 Parking/Driveway F.G. Al 132.2 8.0 120.7 91.3% 90.0% 110 12-12 Parking/Driveway F.G. Al 132.2 6.9 122.2 92.4% 90.0% 111 12-12 Parking/Driveway F.G. Al 132.2 73 119.6 90.5% 90.0% 112 12-16 Truck Ramp 1262 Al 132.2 6.9 119.8 90.6% 90.0% 113 12-16 Truck Ramp 1262 Al 132.2 6.4 119.0 90.0% 90.0% 114 12-17 Parking/Driveway F.G. Al 132.2 9.0 119.1 90.1% 90.0% 115 12-17 Parking/Driveway F.G. Al 132.2 10.7 119.5 90.4% 90.0% 116 12-17 Parking/Driveway F.G. Al 132.2 10.9 120.1 90.8% 90.0% 117 12-17 Parking/Driveway F.G. Al 132.2 9.9 119.0 90.0% 90.0% El 12-17 Parking/Driveway F.G. Al 132.2 10.5 119.2 90.2% 90.0% 119 12-17 Parking/Driveway F.G. Al 132.2 11.7 119.1 90.1% 90.0% 120 12-17 Parking/Driveway F.G. Al 132.2 11.2 120.1 90.8% 90.0% EnGEN Corporation Alesco Development Company, LLC Project Number:T2544-C Appendix Page 7 SUMMARY OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY RELATIONSHIP TEST RESULTS ASTM D 1557-91 (1998) Soil Description (USCS Symbol) Soil Type Maximum Dry Optimum MoistureDensity (PCF) Content (%) Silty Sand, Brown (SM) Al 132.2 8.0 Silty Sand, Brown (SM) A2 133.6 9.1 SUMMARY OF EXPANSION INDEX TEST RESULTS ASTM D 4829-95 Dry Moisture Moisture Soil Type Depth (FT) Density Condition Condition Expansion (pcf) Before Test After Test Index E-1 -1 118.6 8.2% 15.4% 6 E-2 -1 117.2 8.0% 16.9% 5 E-3 -1 117.6 7.4% 15.9% 2 EnGEN Corporation Alesco Development Company, LLC Project Number: T2544-C Appendix Page 8 APPENDIX: DRAWINGS EnGEN Corporation I :! • 6 . I :t i' 1 _ •' t - 1'R I 7a - - ♦Y' N�iOi••iO.O� •O.Oi0i0 IJ♦i♦•♦Oi♦�iP•i•P•O i1 i♦i i♦• P ♦0 : ♦•• .._: -: ip h 'gyp y . .. III 1 ' - ti "� � .. ...•r•♦i'�i4:s•!i •♦ •� .ri •..••�i�♦ • . • • • • •.• * � �.P.♦;.�.P.♦;.P.♦;.4;.t.P.4;.Q.s;.4;.4.O1•.♦;.tsi e�4 ..'_1 ti :. I .. i f PPP95 T ..,. 2 94 . . .•; twt'.4' . :P♦r+'�."•04;.♦• efi1:.♦FF♦T✓ «'.{'»«'^««i♦' s1 • a' 1 •Yp Jt� ! ,L 26-1/2'... •.66.7F5: O - ,.i BB t• •6 Bl� ��65' I ,: l , O• , 6 T 0.5% BUI 6=• FLOOR I;SLOPE JO'' 0' 30' 60' 90 f` 66.tX5 1264 - ,•61.DG C" d� - 1264 ' ;. . 66 7 .�.,: �i ..,.< - Ps p f05 r.:_ ,5b. 2vi`•JC 69 'eq... �-. i.... 4.`3.. � :: GRAPHIC SCALE. 1• 30, n �' k tm 67D U CHANNEL � ----- -5 .�. � I1 67.62fS . • �• Z tl • lO .. .:`� I f N.TS.. ... 6 1 66.26T Y b .0 67.22F5 • • I. .;65.71F5 .65.76E LI Z♦ • 92 ♦ .97 \7 -: mil ?,�.. R�•ey t:3 fir[` ..: •?[':..-ii:o1 I,7 . - _ .,• -:i 66 6.91E ♦ °f jQ� •{° ♦ VJ' `1?j :, .� t 65.97E 5 5 '� • •A. • 5; • .IA • 61.1N S. -d7.1f5. 6.79 • • • • b -..� t 7 .ft_]ti tl r 1 -:: - .. ♦ N ..14�1 1. - �" el 7 1259 OI 67/0 ',:67.66E5 I 6.71f5 . H ik 67.6( .. 1 u67 34FS 0 7 C L 6 391 �tl •. • 1'- . • • • • • �• • •4 i b 7599 •� 73F5.6169E 65.6/(L 66.1x5 66.9/F5 - -' ? r 7A21'S 1 5 7 6 7 71 6AI F 7`3S - 'S,(� .+ I,•D 4 �}S :::, 67 T 9 6 T 68.161 6A.7 i .t•po -u �'�� � i r Yfl:73 67.2Y5 6 6.29FS .6 'l •`J� ! �I I I ..1 1 !J- - 6763F5 1D 67.6F 6B. I t. ✓ fib ye -.� R R+FA ,'� O.SOX 66.66(S-.....-:- _ �-- 050X - - � 0.88X� ••FJ, t _ - S .:': � 6176F5 5 4 _ __-�__._. .. ._ .._._,p:_. ___ -_ , ti� - ♦, lV 7,4 �t 4 :I ;.:. y. 4 e'y y .:� - ' - i 6DCF05[B M(IA05m .. '_k -. .. _ e1 AC IAWC o AG iA1M,' .: _ o o �Va 1 ^ L y, b v } �•!�. .� • ��� •• • ar9 � `µ? ..J NO�M 742F5 1L �:I •.•i Y •l• •Pi ♦�i yip y i I Y- 4'6LwDFiE -. 62 ,. .i ' '.:P♦Cw'tifY«: '.✓».rr ,.;.P..;«;. . .w''t b .I 1 a�cetw amEs .� � - • 5 • ••• • ht t+�iA♦���� . •N•i'si • • .. •:.:•.. y 9_..,.. . .. ♦:. • 67.B5F5 o:. 1 4 /7 1'77.'�„ •. 4. .. 64i ::+� f{.. `` ♦j b.5 ,S�` 70 • ti e 2flS tiySy I , [ f.6 Lht4[IK•QMRR 661/FS ;.. J2 ♦'.] , ^/ - ^ QS b/ b p .:. 104 ♦. 101 t. , Pi , tOT ♦♦. 4 N I - ! 9l0 76 •j� j .-: I }}.:: 1 n Ili. It I;, o6.19f5 65 7 s i.O. ,.. -..° �- 64 : O.... ,._: •, .� DI �}• :, O � P ,. Ft :�A ,-. q'. .. •--:,- -'BLI)OR i U ,..+li ._ 'F , �cP s l26 j ._ i�; J:.' '�j �j81 �.•�< : 3 WIDE GUTTER DETAIL b 4y �i :. y. a ILDING FLOOR I -SLOP • i I V ...� .�0.5/0 I S7 59- S N.T.S. 7 r I v'7 6576T � 1,♦ � 71 �i I ♦ 7 , �iO� • .,♦ 6ZNR .9 3 - I LSS6tt J:s x _ •" � OJ �I„ 0 2 ,:. N.N..�•.,�N i�1 s�•" •���1�' • i N����i1♦i«N� w��•� 11259 V�;67.21Fs (5 X a :: FS 7l i ....1� • I 65.16FL • ... . FS' - 1 iltt7 rl B 6iT^ ) •i•7N♦i�- .. .Yy1 •. J.A� �j��.V•.♦•^•ry•� 1���♦�•i•{�M owl • ♦ •��•M� ' '_ 67.19R I 6SUFL d. C/L M Oi O 114 T 74 I 3 � � a: .i. • • •^•�i�i �• •♦•N •{• 4♦•�♦P♦O•r•04�• i4i� • .• •4Yi0i•`•4•iPiO.4�i0i♦�i0i♦♦ 7.,.,.. - i :I,1 '.!721!.9 Ail 7 1 w I:�� t � R-♦♦ .=i 5-�i � 0.. _ ♦ • 66,1 r I :1 ,. - mo' . 1 !' i263 •�t1F 67.63E5 I. 1 . d •. 'i O' ♦ 29PRW I , Q ♦�. •43FS .. I _I i 7 A1�72... • AC 11IM a AG.A•CB BUI �G. FLOOR, SLOPE: ♦. I .. ...., • 6L69Ft ,- _. 107 is f• 100 I ! 1 I..,. •,-. (Ott• S .. ,.. .. .. .. -. _ : :� ., ♦ _- .._._O. • =i O ! RLDGA 36 6 •9. '- 111t 4. 4v - 2 1aff" i ♦ 1263 _. `• ,. 61 ..- _. .. O 66830 • °I DmWar a/717r 454'0.44L4 1E[R•(ENF[tF � ♦. 1..,.' 6 1 ♦. . t b 4y 4 } 7 -9I'i .62Z.. Ik r• T I ?" i 6 9T I.'♦ j• • I 34 F$ N ♦' •70F5 66 75F1 •�I, 68B IAt t/_ - v }� • Oi • 4 1 •: 4741 ° 5 I'd tl 1`72 t♦'. - • � � 'A • ':' •: •` .31 -?1t _ 6� �8 WIDE GROSS GUTTER DETAIL 7FL - . I : - :i N.T.S. OFS J. ,'6fi.CF5 44 • iC 2 ,.l� 6fi.64F5 67,I3f5� 7 7 I 67,32F5 1-',. .: _ 41T 7.74iC fi1.5,5I 7 67 I .y. .....,_: .. ,. .'73f5 'I )7 7141 iC F w ri.6 - 65.94F5 66.J6F5 �.9 C 66.7IFS 66.65f5 6G94F5 6126F5� 67.01F5 ¢,21F5 En GEN Ca oration a.n.a,..r 'E .«wo n,.a., 4i y B k 66A 7FS`.M•.,,n '. .«. - by`b� ll tJ]64.59FL o k 6711 F'",67011 SITE,PLAN w IV) b kI 64 1 K ". k 66.SIFL 66.56 L' ... 117--pt 6 7 -C9 S09 I I 1,7 0� hl 4 � ,I f'I '74•�1 - O 1 H6 66A6tt - PROJECTNUMBER: ?2544•C' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL MAP 30660 ' - R _ ,:., •: ' �1. T ��a ._.- S.6fit.. s�9lc 667are ss.or ! .... DATE:DECEMBER 2002 SCALE:1"='30 ' <S • 4.4eIt 65.11Ft. , 6i69rs 6590FL 66.28FS 66.safs:. f 667 T - P6.15FI. - •; 4 6. T 6 iS - �G.1H 66�1G ,66.551 66 71C: 66.23FL -56.75TC j66 901 2 f LONSTRUCIIDN NOTES _ CLIENT NAME: : ALESCO DEVELOPMENT CO.,LLC FIGURE: 1A - E 569iG 65 2F5 65.1ffiL 0.409. '1 65.6Af5 6Sfi9F5 2 O.40X 66.Ox5 66.07F5; 1 .0.40E 66.1xL 66AOft ' ...... --.:. __.:_.:,. _65.9 �,1 INSTAL/X A.C.:OWR X.AB. PER SOILS REPORT ' ,'*' ...:, ; - 66 TC 6. 6X 66. C fi15:ft 65.57F7 fi5.93Ft 5 6595FL t( (S `¢53J. S1L.1 f....M ( ..„ �:. 5 69 W rs ' © COVSTRUCT 6-CURB AND CUTTER(APE A-6)PER COUNTY OF PIVER57DE STANDARD PLAN NO 200 • - , .:. _ /x t. I - ` •`3 'CONSTRUCT/'CONCRETE SIDEWALK PfR RIW-R570£COUNTY 3TANOARD NO.401. LEGEND - " --- -- - '- - - -- - . . -' ?I:.4'I •a:�-. Cl xr 1L ,. CONSTRUCT b'CURB ONLY(TYPE D)'PER COUNTY OE RIWR570f STANDARD PLAN N0.204.". '� _ __ t 8 , APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF IN PLACE DENSITY TEST J s - 4c ss CONSTRUCT V CHANNCI PER DETAIL N£REOV. 1 _ ! Yr ? es SJ,yJ, �aJ'er .'�gE•92� i, I,y,tl © CONSTRUCT J INDE V-CUTTER PER DCLvI fTER£OK Li APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDISTURBED BOTTOM TEST • `I 4 O7 CONSTRUCT B'INDC CROSS CUTTER PER DETAIL HEREON. : G g INSTALL 1'X 4'REOW"HEADER 1259 APPROXIMATE ELEVATION OF OVEREXCAVATION BOTTOM E1O EMST•WI® `�°�°' E1m.CURD°t�T6R S'FEU Q CGNSTRUC7 CURB OPENING PER OE/AK HLREOv. .•♦.41♦•s•. >: 'CONSTRUCT 12'WDE CURB OPfMNC PER DETAIL-CW SHEET N0.J ° '�. . . • APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF EIGHT FOOT OVEREXCAVATION - - - nest, 7Ta4L i 4 1©'TRANswam FRom J'INDE CROSS CUT7LR TO 6'wDE CROSS GUTTER -- APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF THREE FOOT OVEREXCAVATION qj CONS7RUCT CURB'OUILET PER COUNTT RlVfRS70£STD.PLAN NO 308. : - , COVSWCT ACCESS RAMP PER DfTAft HERELW. FES - - ' ®-CQVS1RUCl DECORAIIW PA4£RS PER LANDSCAPE ARCH/7ECT5 PLAN -, - ��sO�pti 1 t7�1 • , - CITY OF LAI(E ELSINORE ' W { �J TRAN,977 N fROV 6'CURB TO 0'CURB ` , : ,% y, RECEIVED ! p CY ,sMCT.6'CONCRETE PAD 42465 .,.No. ® e JAN 2 2 201 I i ®"CONSTRUCT 6 COVCWETE.7RVCKI,EIL.PER DETAIL HEREON. nvli �c �• �.�:. / INSTALL.LIMP DRAINAGE SWALE.PER DETAIL{N SHEET NO.3 - `4 - .\.FW.CALDFY ` EI2INEEAING D9�ARTMENC REVISIONS PREPAREDUNDfR:rFlf UPERNSIONOF• PREPARED BY. ITN F' AK IJ�J�RE: ;'C O L E ELS a 9 az PRECISE GRADING PLAN A Jensen & Msoclates OVILn+O FrMG LOM PWm Lwm'mN0 . DON LETEY R.CE. 42465 "DATE REG.UP. -JT-o4 - 1487 VWoodvale One•Rhmrs&,C;92so6•t l 7so 1 s2a•FAX(909 780-162o :PARCEL , MAP' 3 0 6 8 0: � L THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN REWEWED FOR CLWPUANCE WIN THE APPROPRIATE CONDI77ONS SCALE. BENCH MARK - OF DEEOLOPMENT AND/OR CITY AND STATE,LAWS, AND A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. „_ MVERSDE COUNTY BENCHMARK EL-4-60: 1 - - 1 30 1 t 2 ALUMINW CAP IN 6'CONC.COLLAR 0.7 MI. - ' = .I 'd n /• CITY OF:LAKE. ELSINORE REF DESCRIPTION BY APPR DA1E �fy/lrry DATE' 0.7 MI.SW FROM INT.OF CORYDON STREET AND MISSION DESIGNED BY. DRAWN BY. ''•� 9=� "0 L ;.._._ FfEET ' , RA OND O DONNELL, CITY ENGINEER DATE TRAIL TOO'NW OF C.L.CORYDON ST. - CHECKED BY. PROD. MGR.: R.CE. N0. 26603, R£C. ExP. 09-05-02 EIEu.tM5.00 W.O. FOR,' F,B. FLOE No. _ Y 9/6,/02 z " a - 1I r i""_T