HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR31920-8 RGP GRADING NOTES: y
ROUGH GRADING PLAN
1. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE
CHAPTER 15.72 AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE LATEST EDITION y
OF THE C.B.C. APPENDIX J. SE
2. A PERMIT SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, R
PRIOR TO ANY OPERATION. FOR
" 1Q-//� }^( �R N
3. THE DEVELOPER
422/4 33) 48 HOURS PRIOR SHALL
GRADING UTILITY COMPANIES AND U.S.A. TRACT 3 920-V 2
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
OF BEGINNING GRADING OPERATIONS. OgNY
5. DUST SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY WATERING OR OTHER METHODS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. �KESHORE DRIVE ON ROAD
B. CUT SLOPES SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN 2 HORIZONTAL TO 1 VERTICAL, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
AND SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. �s HEMLOCK STREET
7. FILL SLOPES SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN 2 HORIZONTAL TO 1 VERTICAL, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
APPROVED, SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN, AND SHALL NOT HAVE LESS THAN 90% RELATIVE COMPACTION
OUT TO THE FINISHED SURFACE. MAUL p0�
S. FILLS SHALL BE COMPACTED THROUGHOUT TO 90% DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY THE
A.S.T.M. D-1557-70 TEST METHOD. SPECIAL NOTES
9. FILL AREAS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ALL VEGETATION AND DEBRIS, SCARIFIED, AND INSPECTED BY THE 41. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEERNG GEOLOGIST/SOILS
GRADING INSPECTOR AND APPROVED SOILS TESTING AGENCY PRIOR TO THE PLACING OF FILL. ENGINEER NOT LESS THAN 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE LOCATION OF ANY SOILS PROPOSED
10. ALL FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CLEAN EARTH. NO FILL SHALL BE PLACED UNTIL PREPARATION OF FOR IMPORT. EACH PROPOSED IMPORT SOURCE SHALL BE SAMPLED, TESTED AND APPROVED
GROUND IS APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. PRIOR TO DELIVERY OF SOILS FOR USE ON THE SITE. O� \ OLIVE ST.
11. FINISH GRADE SHALL BE SLOPED AWAY FROM ALL EXTERIOR WALLS AT NOT LESS THAN 1/2" PER FOOT 42. THE CITY'S APPROVAL OF THIS ROUGH GRADING PLAN DOES NOT GRANT ANY APPROVAL FOR *�V y /p
FOR A MINIMUM OF 3', THEN 1% (MINIMUM) TO FLOWLINE OF EARTH SWALE. THE HAVE THERR PAD ELEVATIONS AALL FUTURE
RESIDENTIAL INIMUM AND/OR COMMERCIAL
LOTS FINISHED FLOORS ?r V�1
12. MINIMUM BUILDING PAD AND DRAINAGE SWALE SLOPE SHALL BE 1% IF CUT OR FILL SLOPE IS LESS ELEVATIONS AT ELEVATIONS
FT.
THAN 10', AND 29 IF CUT OR FILL IS GREATER THAN 10'. DRAINAGE SWALES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF °
0.5'DEEP AND CONSTRUCTED A MINIMUM OF 2'FROM THE TOP OF CUT OR FILL SLOPES. 43. REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE LETTER TO RAY O'DONNELL FROM RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD a �� LEMON STREET
P�
13. PROVIDE 5'WIDE BY 1'HIGH BERM OR EQUIVALENT ALONG THE TOP OF ALL FILL SLOPES OVER 5'HIGH. CONTROL DISTRICT, DATED AUGUST 12,1999.THIS GRADING PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THEGRADING PLAN "E"REFERRED TO IN THE ABOVE LETTER FOR FLOOD STORAGE CAPACITY AND PROJECT
14. PROVIDE A BROW DITCH,DESIGNED TO HANDLE 100 YEAR STORM FLOWS ALONG THE TOP OF CUT SLOPES. OPERATION'
15. NO OBSTRUCTION OF FLOOD PLAINSNOTES:OR NATURAL WATER COURSES SHALL BE PERMITTED. EROSION CONTROL AND NPDES/STORM WATER POLLUTION NOTE \\\ ¢` \ SITE
\ \\
16. A SOILS ENGINEER SHALL BE RETAINED BY THE DEVELOPER,TO SUPERVISE GRADING AND PROVIDE A SEE SHEET 8 ,r j0 to r VICINITY MAP
FINAL SOILS REPORT WHICH INCLUDES FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS(SUBDMSIONS)AND EXPANSIVE - F--�'- NOT TO SCALE
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SOIL
17. GRADING CERTIFICATION BY THE DEVELOPER'S CIVIL ENGINEER AND A FINAL COMPACTION REPORT BY A n °
SOILS ENGINEER SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS PRIOR TO ,
ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. SHEET INDEX
18. THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT DATED 5/11/07 PREPARED BY NEBLETT&ASSOCIATES 18
AND THE SOILWORKS LETTER DATED OCTOBER 15,2012 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A PART OF THIS 4 , *, "°, 1 SHEET DESCRIPTION
GRADING PLAN AND SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH.
TITLE SHEET
19. A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER OR LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR SHALL SUBMIT CERTIFICATION OF BUILDING OJ �� -a'--�\
PAD ELEVATION. WHERE SPECIFIC ELEVATIONS ARE REQUIRED,THE ELEVATION(WITH RESPECT TO MEAN I 2 INDEX/DETAILS SHEET
SEA LEVEL)SHALL BE GIVEN. IF AN ELEVATION WITH RESPECT TO ADJACENT GROUND SURFACE IS p. I 1�\� +_ 3-7 ROUGH GRADING TRACT 31920-8
REQUIRED,THE ACTUAL DISTANCE ABOVE THE ADJACENT GROUND SHALL BE GIVEN. B
20. ALL PROPERTY CORNERS SHALL BE CLEARLY DELINEATED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY ^^ 8 EROSION CONTROL SHEET
CONSTRUCTION/GRADING.
21. STABILITY CALCULATIONS WITH A FACTOR OF AT LEAST 1.5 SHALL BE SUBMITTED BY A SOILS ENGINEER
TO THE BUILDING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS FOR CUT AND FILL SLOPES OVER 30'IN VERTICAL
HEIGHT. �� m
22. A FINAL COMPACTION REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL FILLS GREATER THAN ONE FOOT. ---{ ° LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS
23, IF STEEP SLOPING TERRAIN OCCURS UPON WHICH FILL IS TO BE PLACED,IT MUST BE CLEARED,KEYED LOT
AND BENCHED INTO FIRM NATURAL SOIL FOR FULL SUPPORT. PREPARATION SHALL BE A{OU3E
APPROVED BY A REGISTERED SOILS ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FILL MATERIAL SLOPES GREATER THAN 5:1 ARE GIOL.F /' _ TRACT BOUNDARY TC TOP OF CURB
REQUIRED TO BE KEYED AND BENCHED. i / ------ RIGHT OF WAY FL FLOWLINE ELEV.
24. THE SOIL ENGINEER SHOULD INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION IN THE FOLLOWING STAGES: TG TOP OF GRATE
LOT LINE
A. UPON COMPLETION OF CLEARING AND DURING EXCAVATION AND BEFORE BACKFILL OF ALLUVIAL, I I
COLLUVIAL AND TERRACED AREAS AND ANY SUBSTRUCTURES. `, II - GB GRADE BREAK
B. DURING ALL ROUGH GRADING AND OPERATIONS INCLUDING PRE-COMPACTION, BENCHING AND FILLING I I � y TOP&TOE Of SLOPE FG FINISH GRADE
OPERATIONS. I ___'
C. DURING INSTALLATION OF BUTTRESS AND CANYON SUB-DRAINS AND FILTER MATERIAL '�� _ -R---R- RIDGE LINE LP LOW POINT
D. WHEN ANY UNUSUAL GRADING CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING C NSTRUCTT9N. HP HIGH POINT
25. EROSION CONTROL: ALL GRADED SLOPES SHALL BE PLANTED WITH ROSEA ICE PLANT AT 12" / -C---C- CONTROL LINE
ON CENTER OR ANOTHER APPROVED GROUND COVER. SLOPES OVER 15'IN VERTICAL !� ♦ INDEX MAP INV. INVERT OF PIPE
HEIGHT,IN ADDITION TO GROUND COVER,SHALL BE PLANTED WITH APPROVED TREES,SHRUBS,OR \ 1'-200' _1250- PROPOSED CONTOUR FS FINISH SURFACE
COMBINATION THEREOF. SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED AT 10'ON CENTER;TREES,20'ON CENTER;COMBINATIONS, 15'ON CENTER. SLOPES OVER 3'IN VERTICAL HEIGHT SHALL HAVE PERMANENT IRRIGATION PRIVATE ENGINEER'S NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR O SHEET NUMBER I 1250---- EXISTING CONTOUR FF FINISHED FLOOR
SYSTEMS WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES PER UPC. - /r PAD- PAD ELEVATION
THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF PITY UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPES OR STRUCTURE SHOWN ON THESE q e i 1-- EXISTING POWER POLE -
26. APPROVED PROTECTIVE MEASURES AND TEMPORARY DRAINAGE PROVISIONS MUST BE USED TO PROTECT PLANS WERE OBTAINED BY A SEARCH OF THE AVAILABLE RECORDS.THESE LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ... I 1 I, �SUB-IRAs NUMBER �� LOT NUMBER GFF GARAGE FINISHED FLOOR
ADJOINING PROPERTIES DURING THE GRADING PROJECT. AND SHALL BE CONFIRMED BY THE CONTRACTOR,SO THAT ANY NECESSARY ADJUSTMENT CAN BE MADE - --- GL GARAGE UP
27. APPROVED EROSION PREVENTATIVE DEVICES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED DURING THE RAINY IN ALIGNMENT AND/OR GRADE OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT.THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO ��-r - ii DAYLIGHT UNE
SEASON AND SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH DAY'S WORK. TO TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT ANY UTILITY LINES SHOWN AND ANY OTHER LINES
NOT ON RECORD OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS,AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION OF,AND GUTTER FLOW RATE
28. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY AND STATE CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ORDERS. ANY DAMAGE TO THESE LINES OR STRUCTURES. GRADED SWALE
29. THE LOCATION AND PROTECTION OF ALL UTILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMTTEE. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR AGREES HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE --- STREET CENTERLINE
CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT,INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS EARTH WORK QUANTITIES
30. AN APPROVED SET OF GRADING PLANS SHALL BE ON THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES. AND PROPERTY,THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING -------- FLOWLINE
HOURS,AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND,INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND ENGINEERT ` p(PQ� 18 CONSTRUCTION NOTE
31. SANITARY FACILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON THE SITE FROM BEGINNING TO COMPLETION OF GRADING HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY,REAL OR ALLEGED,IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF
OPERATION. WORK ON THIS PROJECT,EXCEPTING FOR THE UABIUTY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER 3,374 C.Y. 1,746 C.Y. 1,628 C.Y. GRAVEL BAG ROW
32. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE PLANTED AND IRRIGATION FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL SLOPES OR THE ENGINEER. 4
IN EXCESS OF 3 FEET VERTICAL HEIGHT WITHIN 90 DAYS AMR COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING AND SHALL BE PER
STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS
__ _ P STORM DRAIN
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE NO.882 PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF FINAL INSPECTION. ILA lii ESTIMATED VOLUMES FOR PERMIT PURPOSE.CONTRACTOR SHALL -
33. ANY CONTRACTOR PERFORMING WORK ON THIS PROJECT SHALL FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THE SITE AND SOILS ENGINEERS CERTIFICATE DETERMINE HIS OWN QUANTITIES.
BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES RESULTING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY _ '"'
auaacHXya- EXISTING MASTER DEVELOPER WALL
FROM HIS OPERATIONS,WHETHER OR NOT SUCH FACILITIES ARE SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. SOMMS W,HAS REVIEWED THE PUNS FROM A AND FENCE-SEE MASTER DEVELOPER
34. THE DESIGNER ENGINEER SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ONE(1)BLUE TOP PER FINISHED PAD, PRIOR TO GEaOX/MTECHNICk ENGINEERING STANDPOW ONLY.THE LANDSCAPE PLANS
ROUGH GRADE APPROVAL. PLANS ARE W COMP Wa WITH THE '
ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS PRESENTED IN THE REFERENCED OCH300C D- PROPOSED MASTER DEVELOPER
35. APPROXIMATE DATE OF: BEGINNING OPERATION: AUGUST 2013 PROTECT REPORT(S)AND SUBSEQUENT ADDENDA.RnS REVIEW DID WALL AND FENCE
COMPLETION: DECEMBER 2013 NOT RKXUDE CHECKING THE ACCURACY OF THE CAL AND STRUCTIM SEE MASTER DEVELOPER LANDSCAPE PLANS
36. NO ROCK OR OTHER IRREDUCIBLE MATERIAL WITH A MAXIMUM DIMENSION GREATER THAN 3" WILL BE ENGINEERING DESIGN AND DINENSIONS,INCLUDING LINES AND GRADES, ® PROPOSED MERCHANT BUILDER WALL
PLACED IN FILLS WITHIN ROADBED AREAS OR 3'OF FINISH GRADES,UNLESS THE LOCATION,MATERIAL, OR COWUNCE IWRI BUILDING CODE REWIREAIEVIS,INCH ARE UNDER SEE MASTER DEVELOPER LANDSCAPE PLANS
AND DISPOSAL METHODS ARE SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE PURElr OF OTHERS QeGRESAoeTTArgFNcy Q p
37. THE ENGINEER MUST SET GRADE STAKES FOR ALL DRAINAGE DEVICES AND OBTAIN INSPECTION BEFORE PROJECT No.: - ° e EXISTING STREET LIGHT
APPROVAL Ali JlSS
38. GRADING PLANS WILL NOT BE APPROVED UNTIL ALL RETAINING WALLS ARE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING REFORT(S)DATE; 15012N�'GE3�6,W ` ". . '` EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
DEPARTMENT. EXISTING WATER LINE
w* GFOTECN���F°Q
39, THIS SITE HAS OBTAINED A NATIONAL POLLUTION PREVENTION ELIMINATION SYSTEM(NPDES) SIGNATURE DATE; 8-1 cP EXISTING WATER LATERAL
PERMIT TO REGULATE MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL STORM WATER DISCHARGES. AND METER BOX
NPDES WOID#:8 33C358736 DATE ISSUED:6/23/10 S�ruTURE. DATE. 6 ro EXISTING WATER VALVE
40. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS WILL NT KEPT CLEAR OF ALL OBSTRUCTIONS.NO BUILDINGS OR WALLS SHALL _oo EXISTING SEWER LINE
r> BE PLACED WITHIN EASEMENT LIMITS.TEMPORARY IMPROVEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO REMOVAL AT OWNER'S EXPENSE. (° Q Q o o Q Q EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE
006 O v 1/21 i/.3 Call 2 Full WofWV Day�In Adonca GRADING PERMIT NO. 13- SW
REVISIONS: PREPARED UNDER SUPERVISION OF: SCALE: /1/1 WI L S O N M 1 KAM 1 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST: SOILS ENGINEER OWNER !11
PP �
SOILWORKS, INC. SOILWORKS, INC. McMILUN SU OTES MMERLY, LLC ��t�•wYY l 08/12/13 W CORPORATION SHEET 1
o ,r SCOTT M.WILSON DATE
9. EARTH SCIENCES GROUP EARTH SCIENCES GROUP P.O.BOX 85104 �' RCE NO.49804 EXP. 9-30-14 DATE: 3 PETERS CANYON T. 949-679-0090 ROUGH GRADING PLAN
' 350 FISCHER AVENUE 350 FlSCHER AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92186-5104 No.49084 9/26/12 SUITE 110 F: 949-s7s-0091 OF 8
yo � THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE IRVINE CA 92606
COSTA MESA, CA 92626 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 T 619 794-1252 * c"P°"°"A A APPROPRIATE CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT AND/OR CITY AND BENCHMA K: (� pC
N ( ) MARK DESCRIPTION BY APPR. DATE J9 01VTL ��' THE ST TE LAWS AND PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. RIVERSIDE BENCHMARK N0.BM E-3-70.ELEV.1279.829. BRASS DISC IN CONCRETE POST 72'NORTH OF'T' TRACT NO. 319ZO-O FILE N0.
PH: 714-668-5600 PH: 714-668-5600 F(619) 336-3010 A W INTERSECTION OF CORYDON STREET AND MISSION TRAIL 27'EAST OF THE CENTERLINE OF MISSION TRAIL TITLE SHEET
o DESIGNED BY: WMC DRAWN BY: WMC Od�f LY BASIS OF BEARING
www.soilworlEsinc.com CHECKED BY: S.WTLSON PROJECT MANAGER:S.WILSON KEN SEUMALO RCE 56915 EXP.6-30-1 GTY ENGINEER DATE I SEL SNSForEC REAL�$MEETBAND STON MAAN�91�MAID CERUMENTS 3 AND 4,BEING THE EAL STREET AND CORYDON STREET.RUNE /U7 c1
. y
LEGEND LOT LINE
Max reach=500'(see note 1) Tamped backfill
Slope direction
Optional maintenance- Direction of flow TEMPORARY BERM 0 BE REMOVED
Cross barrier opening detail DURING PRECISE RADING)
(See note 10) TOP OF SLOPE 2'
Wood stake " UPPER PAD
Fabric Fabric �� `,.
i_
LOWER PAD
Toe of slope `,,\ Crass barrier TYPICAL SECTION FOR ABUTTING REAR YARDS
PLAN NI AND ADJACENT SIDE YARDS
NOT TO SCALE
SILT FENCE End detail
n n
NOTES NOT TO SCALE R_ � R/W
I I PROJECT YARD WALL I I
r FUTURE WALL I
II II TOP OF
1. Construct the length of each reach so that the change in base elevation I TEMPORARY BERM 0 BE REMOVED I SLOPE TEMPORARY BERM BE REMOVED
along the reach does not exceed 1/3 the height of the linear barrier, in no Sift fence 1 ff 2' DURING PRECISE RADING) I �2�DURING PRECISE RADING)
case shall the reach length exceed 500'. ds
3
2. The last 8'-0" of fence shall be turned up slope.
MIN—� PAD 3' �' � PAO
� II
3. Stake dimensions are nominal. Toe of slope 2 TOP OF '
SIDEWALK 8'MIN
01
4. Dimension may vary to fit field condition. 2X SLOPE % --',"
5. Stakes shall be spaced at 8'-0' maximum and shall be positioned on FUTURE RETAINING/YARD WALL
downstream side of fence. Ni
6. Stakes to overlap and fence fabric to fold around each stake one full turn. SECTION B-B
Secure fabric to stake with 4 staples. CROSS BARRIER DETAIL NOT TO SCALE
7. Stakes shall be driven tightly together to prevent potential flow-through of R/W LOT LINE
sediment at joint. The tops of stakes shall be secured with wire.
100,
8. For end stake fence fabric shall be folded around two stakes one full turn Sandbags
and secured with 4 staples. 65' 35'
Y
R/W 9. Minimum 4 staples per stake. Dimensions shown are typical. VARIES VARIES 2'BENCH
TOP OF BERM
10. Cross barriers shall be a minimum of 1/3 and a maximum of 1/2 the See note 10
6' height of the linear barrier. -��-
FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION 9 1
EVMWD STD. W-7 SIDEWALK(TIP.) 6' .15'
2X' CURB FACE 11. Maintenance openings shall be constructed in a manner to ensure sediment
remains behind silt fence. 13 BLADED SWALE TX LOWER PAD 1X
I LEVEL ELEVATION
12. Joining section shall be not to placed at sump locations. SECTION C-C 2% r----
13. Sandbag rows and layers shall be offset to eliminate gaps. SLOPE VARIES IF GREATER THAN 3.5'
_______� VERTICAL CUT IF LESS 7H4N 3.5'
FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION SECTION A-A
Nrs Setback varies Fabric section B EXISTING GROUND
TYPICAL LOT SECTION
(See notes 4) '
Stoke B -(See notes 6,7& 12) LEGEND NOT TO SCALE
R/W' STREET LIGHT STANDARD Tamped backfill A
CIT1'OF LAKE ELSINORE STD.501 2"X2' Wood stake Stake A
Fabric (See notes 3&5) Slope direction I I I
SIDEWALK(rYP.) Toe of IT pe Fabric section A Direction of flow j LANE LIVE LINE 1
LOT LOT LOT
CURB FACE - -—
2X Slope (See notes 6,7&12) _ __ __ _�__
b See detail A w+ - _- c,{ T �'+ —�-- r3{ �y�---------�L
JOINING SECTION DETAIL Ir<i i 1
(TOP VIEW) I I I
STREET LIGHT LOCATION 1 z• I I I RELPER PLAN P.E.=PER PLAN P.E.=PER PLAN
Nrs 2"X2" Wood stake 2R I I ILEVEL ELEVATION LEVEL ELEVATION LEVEL ELEVATION 2XI
(See note 3) 1/16" 1 1 1 I
Fabric diameter I-1 __—_— __ _—_ ____---__ _____________T_
6' (See notes 8) I � i GRADE BREAK GRADE BREAK GRADE BREAK I
f=-I B I I 3 R BENCH I 3'4
1/2" B I I I LOT LOT WHERE WALL
I I I I LINE I�LINE OCCURS
SECTION A-A
END STAKE DETAIL STAPLE DETAIL
R/W R/W (TOP VIEW) (SEE NOTE 9) IJWAIL "11111�
_ 48' (R.O.W.)
.� 2RI I I EXIST,
i PARKING ALLOWED I 2"X2" WOOD STAKE f I I I 2R
6' 18, 16' 6'I Silt fence I I I SW Fabric End stake SW (See note 2) Fabric BLADED SWALE BLADED SWALEStake I BLADED SWAE 13Stake GRADE BREAK3' VARIES 2X MIN. Fabric _ ____ SRADIt@BEAK= ---- GBAOE BREAILro 2:1 MAX. �
3,PERPAD PUN PEPAD 1OTit fence -=�- { L m{
1.5'
I21r 2X 2A IX-1 45
PAD
{ EXISTGRADEPROPOSED DRIVEY APRON
BLADED SWALE r BLADED SWALE End stake Toe of slope _
IDE
PROPOSED SIDEWALKS AND DRIVEWAY APRONS fi" PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER _ R
VARIES 2X MIN. PER SEPARATE PUNS.DRIVEWAY CURB DEPRESSIONS
TO 2:1 MAX. ALL IN-TRACT STREETS ARE EXISTING. N1
EXISTING ROUGH GRADING SECTION End stake ndbags(2-layers height) A
DETAIL A
FUTURE IN-TRACT STREETS SECTION END DITAIL OPTIONAL MAINTENANCE OPENING DETAIL TYPICAL LOT DRAINAGE AND GRADING
Y=2O'
' SCALE: ��?1w-4 0'
NOTES: SILT FENCE DETAIL /�1 11 (SEE NOTE 11)
1. 6"TYPE 6 CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE STD.NO.200 NOT TO SCALE •NQ'd bV' 9/21/1z
REVISIONS: PREPARED UNDER SUPERVISION OF: SCALE: /�/� WILSON M 1 KA M 1 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST SOILS ENGINEER: OWNER:
pgbFESSlO,y� ,.t,L �.., 8/12/13 �7 CORPORATION
1. SOILWORKS, INC. SOILWORKS, INC. McMILLIN SUMMERLY, LLC �A M'4j2 OINIM. *�" SHEET 2
e SCOTT M.WILSON DATE DALE: 3 PETERS CANYON T. 949-679-0090 ROUGH GRADING PLAN
3 EARTH SCIENCES GROUP EARTH SCIENCES GROUP P.O.BOX 85104 RICE N0.49884 EXP. 9-30-14
350 FISCHER AVENUE 350 FISCHER AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92186-5104 H No.49884 f SUITE 110 F: 949-679-0091 OF 8
o * shoi4 * THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN RENEWED FOR COMPUANCE WITH THE IRVINE CA 92606
COSTA MESA, CA 92626 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 T(619) 794-1252 E•P CIVIL APPROPRIATE COND11IDNS OF DEVELOPMENT AND/OR CITY AND
IBYAPPR.MARK DESCRIP IONDATE !,Y ��' THE STATE LAWS,AND ERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. RIVERSIDE BENCHMARK NO.BM E-3-70.ELEV.1279.829. BRASS DISC IN CONCRETE POST 72'NOUN OF Y TRACT NO. 31920-8 FILE NO.
PH: 714--668-5600 PH: 714-668-5600 F(619) 336-3010 k�X INTERSECTION OF CORYDON STREET AND MISSION TRAIL 27'EAST OF THE CENTERLINE OF MSSION TRAIL
DESIGNED BY: WMC DRAWN BY: wMC GP i9 BASIS of BE_JCFoCFE DETAILS AND SECTIONS 1 D-79
WWW.soi lworksinc.corn CHECKED BY: S.WILSON PROJECT MANAGER:S.WILSON KEN SEUMALO RCE 56915 EXP.6-30-1 CITY ENGINEER DALE N1FRS�ECTION OF CER DING
NSTONEMAN STREET ANDMCERUFAIL 3 ANµD4,OBaN%O 7HETC�ENIERLINE
N
...........
7
STREET)
IL
1265.0 TC
zZ_z__ j cy-
Iz000 5 rc
�Er-
-z:
3
-�Orc
WA
...........
lot- PROPOSED WALL
LIMITS OF GRADING
R/W LOT LINE
NED
1268.4 PANEPHAS T
FG
BUILDER WALL
SIDEWALK HOA LOT A
PROPOSED WALL
3 2'
TOP OF
SLOPE
PAI�0�? UMITS OF GRADING PAD
OSED
20S i w
6v 2 0 7 8 ELEVATION
ELEVATION
LIMITS OF GRADING PAD-126Z0
P40=12670
EXISTING WALL SECTION F—F
NOT TO SCALE
N piID.1267.0
lu
x
%)
ILU TRACT
I() BOUNDARY
PAD-1268.3 wa, m rn FUTURE WALL
....... ..
...... cOP OF
w
DAYLIGHT TO SrLOPE
Ed. EXIST GROUND
1266, EXISTING EXISTING
I GREENSKEEPER Pam—
1.0% 1265.711 PARKWAY
101.62' 05%
72
j� PROPOSED
E 126 7 717<11" F PAD ELEVATION
1266,1 TC 1 9,TIC_................. 1265.5 TC
F_ c*
SECTION A
266.,l
NOT TO SCALE
..........
PAD-1268.2
TRACT
f / •`.J7 I ..r(5�� — i —_ BOUNDARY TRACT
F W
EXISTING BOUNDARY
FUTURE WALL
ALL
-———————————————————————— —
--l---- -- ----""' ----- -11 _=- GRADE 8
61.41' 60,00' DAYLIGHT TO TOP OF
EXIST. GROUND 2:1 DAYLIGHT TO SLOPE
EXISTING SLOPE SLOPE EXISTING EXIST. GROUND
LIMITS OF GRADING _UPPER PAD EXISTING SLOPE PROPOSED
EXISTING SURFACE PAD
EXISTING WALL I RN
PARKWAY
PROPOSED
PAD ELEVATION
PAD ELEVATION
18 17 16
PAD=1268.8 PAD-1268.5 PAD-1268.1 SECTION E—E
PAD-1269.2 w NOT TO SCALE SECTION C—C
NOT TO SCALE
P PAD=1269.5
AID-1
NOTE
SEE TYPICAL LOT DRANAGE DETAIL ON SHEET 2
FOR PAD GRADING
iz;
& SEE SHEET 2 FOR SECTION 8-8
.............. LEGEND
—7- 70 LOT NUMBER
7 "r:7
18 PAD= PAD ELEVATION
Ua.�F EXISTING
OVEMENTS TC TOP OF CURB
BCR BEGIN CURB RETURN
2.LZ 0.Lax 15 0 ECR END CURB RETURN
TURNBERRY
4
SEE SHEET
GRAPHIC SCALE
SEE SHEET 7
..IN FEET
m 1 ih= 20 R.
6 v I zp -/j
REVISIONS: PREPARED UNDER SUPERVISION OF: SCALE: WILSON MIKAMI CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST: SOILS ENGINEER: OWNER: r
SOILWORKS, INC. SOILWORKS, INC. McMILLIN SUMMERLY, LLC 08/12/13 CORPORATION SHEET 3
SCOTT M.WLSON DATE o EARTH SCIENCES GROUP EARTH SCIENCES GROUP P.O.BOX 85104 DATE: 3 PETERS CANYON T. 949-679-0090 ROUGH GRADING PLAN
RCE NO.49884 EXP. 9-30-14 SUITE 110 F: 949-679-0091 OF 8
350 FISCHER AVENUE 350 FISCHER AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92186-5104 ft.49884 THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE VATH THE IRIANE,CA 92606
COSTA MESA, CA 92626 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 T(619) 794-1252 9/M/14 APPROPRIATE CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT AND/OR CITY AND RGENECHIMERKO.-ENCHMARK NO.BM E-3 70.ELEV.1279.829. BRASS Disc IN CONCRETE POST 72*NORTH OF'r
PH: 714-668-5600 PH: 714-668-5600 F(619) 336-3010 MARK DESCRIPTION BY APPR. DATE THE STATE LAWS,AND P�RMIT CAN BE ISSUED. INTERSECTION OF COR(DON STREET AND MISSION TPAL 27'EAST OF THE CENTERUNE OF MISSION TRAIL TRACT NO. 31920-8 FILE NO.
DESIGNED ilyY...* S.ift C DRAWN BY: WMC I., BASIS OF BEARING:
CENTERUNE OF CEREAL STREET,BEING N5?52'48'W,SEMEN MONUMENTS 3 AND 4,BEING THE CENTERUME LOTS 1-9 AND 16-21 /079
www.soilworksinc.com CHECKED
L PROJECT MANAGER:S.VAL A ALO RCE#56915 U L
L; EIKE SON KEN 14U. R DATE INTERACTIONS of cERFAL smE AND STONEMAN STREET AND CEREAL S1REEf AND CORYDON STREET.
TRACT
BOUNDARY
FUTURE WALL
TOP OF
DAYLIGHT TO SLOPE
EXIST.GROUND
EXISTING SLOPE ,\ \
PROPOSED
PARKWAY �., ,,.=:.:. ,...:..... PAD
EXISTING
PAD ELEVATION 10 0-1
PAD-1267.0
SECTION C-C \
NOT TO SCALE
PROPOSED WALL
rPAD=1267.0 51
kl��
LIMITS OF GRADING
16.64'
7?�y
TRACT '°"�+;•...,,,, ,,. �('�
BOUNDARY
FUTURE .,°� •., 1648� � .
WALL 12 A264.4 TIC 2:1
PAD=1287.0-�'.,.
..
EXISTING SLOPESLOPE (o �. I ,I �o
j PROPOSED T `, 1 84.3 wy LI OF EXISTING
EXISTING SURFACE \____ PAD ELEVATION,....._....__ w� f..ol 716 \, LP / ROVEMENTS
LIJ � — / 1
EXISTING = �� /�41
13 -A
PAD ELEVATION h �'I I I I ,,,� ti
W II i ' i i I \41 A PAD=1267.0 C` ,
SECTION E-E W w 15 PI4,P67.0
NOT TO SCALE CoPAD-126ZB
I � T 1 1 •rCr�-ems- / 1� � \ \\\
m ,. �\ � ' ��„ -- •: ,� LIMITS OF GRADING
NOTE SEE SHEET 3 ____.. _
Jar
��-- --------------------.. / -- - -' ..--.................. '�, sir �
SEE TYPICAL LOT DRANAGE DETAIL ON SHEET 2
FOR PAD GRADING _. _. .... a ... __ ......
.. .... w ..,,.,v. ......... ... 7 /
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SECTION B-B ._ 1 .,.,. .... .. ....... ..... .,,, } /• -1 r,,;, ��
�1 L�
PROPOSED STORM DRAIN �� " -
'' ?.� ,.J T PER SEPARATE PLAN �
LEGEND z r- 18 cs 19 _ zo OSa =—
_ � — p ...............
.. % -
70 LOT NUMBER 00+11 ('S
PAD= PAD ELEVATION FIRST GREEN
ro -/-r% PROPOSED 1c�
TC TOP OF CURB I.��„ ~/� �� ,�
BCR BEGIN CURB RETURN .. ..... .... ..... .. -'----- ......... .... :.. /... ....... ......... ._._._-- �I�..;-:.�%.:.--....
ECR END CURB RETURN
23 Alf ..—_,_..... .�.�. ...... ._.__—_.___......_...._ ._..—.._.-bo
PAD=1267.0 V
W I
I mi i 5�
2 l i VZi F.III II j �
24m W f 25 PAD=126 Z0m a'. 51 I gw cW=126ZD
oti
(n Z t2 .1 PAD=11&x,8 I I' m
1267.E —PaD.,2s�e
PAD III I III I ,r Yr .5g.
SGN�E'• I I III, I III I
/ I IIIi j II I
I I II I I I
I, T II I 5 GRAPHIC SCALE
so o
I
( RT FEET) _ 5 ,. .....-_ 0, .�_ dA-- :.#i, ;';. I I 60.00' 23.0�
.___5 _ .¢ _ _ eo.er, _.._
1 inch= 20 [t
SEE SHEET 5
REVISIONS: PREPARED UNDER SUPERVISION OF: SCALE: WILSON MIKAMI CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST: SOILS ENGINEER OWNER Esslalq 08/12/13
SOILWORKS, INC. SOILWORKS, INC. McMILLIN SUMMERLY, LLC �� M7� C O R PO RATIO N SHEET 4
e o SCOTT M.WILSON DATE
EARTH SCIENCES GROUP EARTH SCIENCES GROUP P.O.BOX 85104 = RCE NO,49884 EXP. 9-30-14 DAB' 3 PETERS CANYON T: 949-679-0090 ROUGH GRADING PLAN
y 350 FISCHER AVENUE 350 FISCHER AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92186-5104 H No.49884 THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE RVT E CSUITE A 92606 F: 949-679-0091 OF 8
COSTA MESA, CA 92626 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 T(619) 794-1252 APPROPRIATE CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT AND/OR CITY AND EN MA K: �p /]�] p
MARK DESCRIPTION BY APPR. DALE 'Jl,, c[v[L \�' THE STATE LAWS,AND PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. RIVERSIDE BENCHMARK NO.BM E-3-70.ELEV.1279.829. BRASS DISC IN CONCRETE POST 72'NORTH OF'r 'RACY NO. 319ZO-8 FILE NO.
PH: 714-668-5600 PH: 714-668-5600 F(619) 336-3010 a �pf\f INTERSECTION OF CORYDON STREET AND MISSION TRAIL 27'EAST OF THE CEN ERUNE OF MISS10 TRAIL
www.soilworksinc.com DESIGNED Y: WMC DRAWN BY: WMC Ge�S CENTERLINBASIS OF E OAF OF CEREAL
STREET,BEING N5752'48'W,BETWEEN MONUMENTS 3 AND 4,BEING THE CENTERUNE LOTS 10-15, Z2-Z6, 57-59
CHECKED BY: S.WILSON PROJECT MANAGER:S.WILSON NEN S UMAI RCE 56915 EXP.6-30-15 CITY ENGINEER DATE INTERSECTIONS OF CEREAL STREET AND STONEMAN STREET AND CEREAL STREET AND CORYDON STREET.
LOT LOT TRACT BOUNDARY TRACT
PROPOSED LINE LINE BOUNDARY \ \\ \ \\\PROPOSED FUTURE
WALL TO' WALL ALL WALL FUTURE \\ \ \ \ \ \
LOT B DAYLIGHT TO • 5 � \ \ \\ '
EXIST.GROUND
PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED
EXISTING SLOPE \ \ \
- PAD ELEVATION PAD ELEVATION PAD ELEVATION EXISTING SLOPE r EXISTING
EXISTING SURFACE
EXISTING SURFACE
\
- EXISTING - PROPOSED 31
LOWER PAD PAD ELEVATION \ \ \ \ \ \
i I PAD=1267.2
SECTION B_—B SECTION E:—E SECTION A—A
NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE ®'��~ > \�0.1 �i v(� \\ \\ $•
1T65.85 \ \ \ \
b GB \\ \ \ \
SEE SHEET 4 3Aza 32
_ PROPOSED IRON FENC
60.00' 1 55.00' I 23.00� N PAD=126ZO
PROPOSED STORM DRAIN \. \
�)„y �.�'� i II I •' PER SEPARATE PLAN \\ \V
Lu
I CC oII I I b \ I I \� O ' \ \ •
WW I II I - II;; 27 29 PAD-12670 _ 126G6B.6 3
Z PAD=116Z7 PA0=126729 S
PAD=1289.9 W 1 7
\\
\
I W coil I I I I
NLL PROPOSED
W I � �• I
\ \ \
TI I N I I i rr .g9ti� LIMITS OF GRADING I \\ \\
i ��- 33 \.
PAD-1267.0 1II \\\ \
... _ L. �...
16
13
�j 1.D — _gam '\A . — o. _
r 1 LINKS Tz6�,
L..................................................... ......._ --
b
\
of
NOTE � ' � i i � i � F5 _i � Fq iq
SEE TYPICAL LOT DRANAGE DETAIL ON SHEET 2 I I C \ ")
FOR PAD GRADING I �� I /L) )
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SECTION B-B 'I I I"C , I \C�) ' ' - I r•� \(,`1) /
.y II I I _ I ..
4 LEGEND 0D=,zszo
70 LOT NUMBER 38 g 36 3542 8 41 $ 40 91 g
II I � PAD=126Z3 gl
PAD=12670 PAD=11670
PAD- ' tPAD= PAD ELEVATION I PAD=126Z6 6�
TC TOP OF CURB PAD-1268.9 PAD-1268.3 PAD=126Z9
BCR BEGIN CURB RETURN
ECR END CURB RETURN
(5),
LIMITS OF GRADING t I PROPOSED WALL k I '..5)\ PROPOSED WALL LIMITS OF GRADING
\ �r
,
\
iT y.... . \ LOT M y' J _ —'— — .._ __-- — ._------1
Q
GRAPHIC SCALE ='.._____ — „
11 TC) 1 6.T Tf i z1 Tc) 1 z5 rc) 1 6Z2 TIC „
iv I IN FEET) ''
T Inch= 20 e1 •`.., \,, 'i',< C'•;,., ,,���EXISTI V STR$/ / / `� '�'" ). } .." --
REVISIONS: PREPARED UNDER SUPERVISION OF: SCALE: W I L S O N M 1 KA M 1 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST SOILS ENGINEER: OWNER QE / r
SOILWORKS, INC. SOILWORKS, INC. McMILLIN SUMMERLY, LLC \rr77 — 'P$�I 08/DATE
WILSON DATE
W C13RPDRATI0N SHEET 5
o s SCOTT
EARTH SCIENCES GROUP EARTH SCIENCES GROUP P.0.BOX 85104 ,� �' RCE NO..ase6a ExP. 9-30-14 DATE: 3 PETERS CANYON T: 949-679-0090 ROUGH GRADING PLAN
�+ SUITE 110
350 FISCHER AVENUE 350 FISCHER AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92186-5104 ti No.49884 F: 949-679-0091 OF 8
THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE NTH THE IRVINE CA 92606
COSTA MESA, CA 92626 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 T(619) 794-1252 -
E^P°�'°�" APPROPRIATE CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT AND OR CITY AND K:
MARK DESCRIPTION BY APPR DALE Jf' civa �! THE STA LAWS, D PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. :RIVERSIDE BENCHMARK N0.BM E-3-70:MISSION
TRAIL.
BRASS DISC IN CONCRETE POSE IS NORTH TRAIL
OFT TRACT NO. 31920-8 FILE N0.
PH: 714�68-5600 PH: 714 668-5600 F(6]9) 336-3010 CALF INIERSECRON OF CORYDON STREET AND M 55pN TRNL. 27'EAST OF THE CENTERLINE OF M650N TIWI
wvnN.Boi lworksinc.com DESIGNED BY: WMC DRAWN BY: WMC 0 �L� LI CENTERDNEEOF CEREAL STREET,BEING N5752'48^M,BERYEEN MONUMENTS 3 AND 4,BEING THE CENTERLINE LOTS 27-42 AND 56 (��j
CHECKED BY: S.WILSON PROJECT MANAGER:S.WILSON KEN SEUMALO RCE 56915 EXP.6-30-1 CITY ENGINEER DATE INTERSECTION OF CEREAL SmEEf AND STONEMAN STREET AND CEREAL STREET AND CORYDON STREET.
SEE SHEET 7
100,62'
I
/) c5� iK •_) I - _ _ I � E92.05' _ __ 55.00' , 55.00' 55.00'
TRACT
BOUNDARY EXIS
WALL
51
2:1 --GRAD BREAK
EXISTING SLOPE SLOPE 1 /`'T_� PAD=1271.8 ^ I I I
EP
—UPR D ( I 52
EXISTING SURFACE
R i PAD=1271.5
5
PROPOSED 1 .. � I 1= ........, �� ' $ 56
�' 1269.9
PAD ELEVATION I 18 53
PAD-- 1^ =PAD 1269 8 P - 69 9
v
PAD=1270.4 AD-t2 I
SECTION E-E
NOT TO SCALE ,) ••''..) - \ / �,' ....................._....._..... ,. ,,/•~.�') \'
ia
my
102.00' -\ w
o ----
TRACT
BOUNDARY TOP OF Co
FUTURE ( ' _..., ......
.. _
to
WALL I EXISTING WALL DAYLIGHT TO \ ' 11 _
EXXIST. GROUND SLOPE I \..� - I r )- - - -�--I-ox-
LIMITS OF GRADING L I N K< Ill
SLOPE EXISTING \
EXISTING PAD y — — —PAD — — — 1 / —
'�
PROPOSED
PAD ELEVATION -----_•„ �.. _... —__ .. .. �._...._ __.._ _ _.._.._ ... .... 1
SECTION A-A `r i I49 >�
NOT TO SCALE / PAD=12725 \')\ I I ,� I VD
AO I 1 I I I I I
1 g I PAD=1271.D g I $ I 43
PAD- 47
T' 46 g I
I PAD- 8 PAD=1270.0 PAD
8 1 I 1 =1269.4 $)( ^
GRADE BREAK °�° I I °' I 1 PAD=1270.6
------------ I I I I 1 1 I I
NOTE
SEE TYPICAL LOT DRANAGE DETAIL ON SHEET 2
FOR PAD GRADING j +, l �+ I .> I •''. I ,> > 1 �� I
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SECTION B-B I ) NWUL i Q �•.� 17\ 1 C'>> �..1 �•• _'.) �U I
I > I I
LEGEND PROPOSED I LIMITS OF'*6 70 LOT NUMBER i.._.....�•^•�`"��. Inn
1
PAD= PAD ELEVATION I//'', � �` _...._..-....._._.... ........_..............—_...._......
TC TOP OF CURB
BCR BEGIN CURB RETURN ( _.......-......._.. _ _....._......_... - _. .__._._._..__...
ECR END CURB RETURN ( �`. -,..,,,.�� /,....•C.2' _. _..._...
O
G)-
_777 _—
S N� .....� ,� 1 s TG) 1 ) 1z7o.6 rc) 1 7.1 IC) -- _ iiss:rc s,1 rc) 1 —
..,.........................._.... ......erl...:x.:v.....,«., a nx:.:x u..,,,, Y
.6 IC) .1 TC) 2676 TC
... t. -1........— ... ._.-- -- -_. ...... ---- -- .._..---
��`�I .... .• •,,, D. �.,)1 o, > ----
DIAAOND
XISTING S /��RIVE
,
GRAPHIC SCALE
m �o
M
( IN FEET)
1 inch= 20 Pt.
F REVISIONS: PREPARED UNDER SUPERVISION OF: SCALE: W I L S ON M 1 KA M 1 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
18 ESSI
ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST SOILS ENGINEER OWNER. 8/12/13
1Lw, J`l � CORPORATION
SOILWORKS, INC. SOILWORKS, INC. McMILLIN SUMMERLY, LLC �A 7 SHEET 6
o SCOTT . 9884 DATE DATE: 3 PETERS CANYON T: 949-679-0090 ROUGH GRADING PLAN
g EARTH SCIENCES GROUP EARTH SCIENCES GROUP P.O.BOX 85104 RCE N0,a9884 EXP. 9-30-14
350 FISCHER AVENUE 350 FISCHER AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92186-5104 No.4BB84: SUITE 110 F: 949-679-0091 OF 8
* a 4 THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE IRVINE CA 92606
COSTA MESA, CA 92626 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 T(619) 794-]252 J,E"P'����� APPROPRIATE CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT AND/OR CITY AND BENCHMARK
: ELEV.ENCHMARK NO.BM E-3-70. _DISC IN ri MARK DESCRIPTION BY APPR. DATE l,� ��` THE STATE LAWS,AND PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. IINTTEERSECCTIOBN OF CORYDON STREET AND MISSION I TRAIL. 27'EAST OF THE CENTER NEPOFMISSION TRAK. r TRACT NO. 31920-8 FILE N0.
PH: 714-668-5600 PH: 714 Fi68-5600 F(619) 336-3010 DESIGNED BY: WMC DRAWN BY: WMC , Dad a p�=��y/� BASIS OF BEARING: �r�
www.soilworksinc.com CENTERLINE OF CEREAL STREET.BEING N5752'4B"N,BETWEEN MONUMENTS 3 AND 4,BEING THE CENTERUNE LOTS 'ri.7-55 / ,
CHECKED BY: S.WILSON PROJECT MANAGER:S.NILSON KEN EUMALO RCE 56915 EXP.6-30-15 CITY ENGINEER DATE INTERSE NS OF CEREAL STREET AND SIGN
STREET AND CEREAL STREET AND CORYDON S1REEf.
TRACT
BOUNDARY -
EXISTING
WALL
SLOPE _ SEE SHEET 3
EXISTING SLOPE � -
1 UPPER N AD ! �� �. �. / �� _� {.
EXISTING SURFACE — — — — — — I I "'�- l.N
PIL
noPAD ELEVATION I R r (PI -
I
! styq L1MR-'OF EKISUNG -�-_-_�_._._.._..._
/4 'IMPROVEMENTS _.__.... .._. _�--�'_--'�-__�
SECTION E-E
2
_ I
NOT TO SCALE �,... _.._.._... .__........... _ ............. -
V
_
-I-- - 116
--
_-... FIRST GREEN
_._
II I I
IG PAD-126.r� j l am, I I 'T
I�. EXISTING WALL \1 j PAD�26&t °�+
PAD=fT69.f,.TV
PAD=126$$? g l PAD=126&3
LIMITS OF GRADING I I
I , •,�"'r I I I
W
co
32. -----
56.07 L
I I
77
I I
NOTE �.:; C' I I 100,62' 'S6,ZYQ. =.�---- -
SEE TYPICAL LOT DRANAGE DETAIL ON SHEET 2 -~�„ � I
_________ L
FOR PAD GRADING 92 ' -"—"-I
.05
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SECTION B-B I --� I 55.00'
LEGEND I
ll
{ II'LOT NUMBER
PAD= PAD ELEVATION - SEE SHEET 6
TC TOP OF CURB
BCR BEGIN CURB RETURN
ECR END CURB RETURN
ti0
SG�
GRAPHIC SCALE
20o lo 20 10 W
( IN FEET)
ft.20=inch I
' 'UDO V 8 izi i/3
REVISIONS: PREPARED UNDER SUPERVISION OF: SCALE: WILSON MIKAMI CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST: SOILS ENGINEER. OWNER cao(Eu/
_ 8/12/13 CORPORATION
SOILWORKS, INC. SOILWORKS, INC. McMILLIN SUMMERLY, LLC ��
m �Ads� SCOTT M.WILSON � DATE pA�; '" SHEET 7
EARTH SCIENCES GROUP EARTH SCIENCES GROUP P.O.BOX 85104 RCE NO.49884 EXP. 9-30-14 3 PETERS CANYON T: 949-679-OD90 ROUGH GRADING PLAN C
y 350 FISCHER AVENUE 350 FISCHER AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92186-5104 H Np,4ggg4 SUITE 110 F: 949-679-0091 OF 8
* E•w a� * THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE IRVINE CA 92606
COSTA MESA, CA 92626 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 T(619) 794-1252 APPROPRIATE CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT AND/OR CITY AND BENCHMARK:
MARK DESCRIPRON BY AM. DATE 'l,� Crva .A\�' THE STATE LAWS,AND PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. RNERSIDE BENCHMARK NO.BM E-3-70.EIF/.1279.829. BRASS DISC IN CONCRETE POST 72'NORTH OF T TRACT NO. M920-8 FILE NO.
PH: 714-668-5600 PH: 714-668-5600 F(619) 336-3010 CAIVF NTERSECTION OF CORYDON STREET AND MISSION TRAIL. 27'EAST OF THE CENTERLINE OF MISSION TRAIL c c A
_ DESIGNED BY: WMC DRAWN 8Y: WMC BA51S OF BEARING: LOTS VO-VAT 1
www.soilworksinc.com Q ZI tN CENTER NE OF CEREAL STREET,BEING N52'52'48'W,BETWEEN MONUMENTS 3 AND 4,BEING THE CENTERLINE
CHECKED BY: S.WTLSON PROJECT MANAGER:S.WLSON KEN SEUMALO RCE#56915 EXP.6-30-15 CITY ENGINEER DATE INTERSECTIONS OF CEREAL STREET ANO STONEMAN STREET AND CEREAL STREET AND CORYDON STREET.
.. SAND BAG(1 WIDE x 2 HIGH)
-- - --- BURY BAG 1/2 BAG HEIGHT
Gurb inlet O '------ SOW- EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
-�- STAGGER BAGS 1.ALL EROSION
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND STANDARDS
OUTLINED 2 N7'f1RIN CONTROL
ORE DESIGN°NMAN MANUAL
(BMP'S),
2.THE DEVELOPER/CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DISCHARGES BY SUBCONTRACTORS.
'\ - '� - -- -- -- -- -- * ' ;a"- ✓' `� ns --•�_ asu - -- 3.IN CASE OF EMERGENCY,CALL ROBERT OUMAN AT(619)520-9560(24-HOUR PHONE NUMBER).
4.DEVICES TO REDUCE EROSION DAMAGE SHALL NOT BE PLACED MOVED OR MODIFIED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL
--"" �/ ..b" OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OR, IN AN EMERGENCY, BY THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR GRADING
Concrete block 1a•d- GRAVEL BAGS (1 WIDE X 2 NIGH) ''�'% :r � �""`'~�"-'y''"��� � -=� ~- t•�.,~ � :`�� OPERATIONS.
lengthwise on f open, n ''"'" •/"" _.- _ .' 5.AREAS THAT ARE CLEARED AND GRADED SHALL BE LIMITED TO ONLY THE PORTION OF THE SITE THAT IS
®per'rneter of opening /'"3 NOT TO SCALE -''"�� "' '•JR""�"'- ter-°+ `W+ �'Yr �`
Iiordwora clntn or ."��''",,." 12e.1tir%�' `ra "„✓yr�i" "�►"; "'"+R"• "- // f NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION.THE CONSTRUCTION SITE SHALL BE MANAGED TO
t _ / SCHEDULING
t 2t1f.N 158.%
er''l .,- ,. -„r•-- x '°".�r°t�.,�^^ :-',/�. MINIMIZE THE EXPOSURE TIME OF DISTURBED SOIL AREAS THROUGH PHASING AND
l
- E T SOIL STABILIZATION.
,. '' `, •, sa 5 OF GRADING AND THE USE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT S
1211U 1 .. Jr yq3 6.ONCE DISTURBED,GRADED SLOPES EXCEEDING A 3:1 RATIO AND/OR TEN(10)FEET IN HEIGHT(TEMPORARY OR
x ^•. s, PERMANENT)SHALL BE STABILIZED IF THEY WILL NOT BE WORKED WITHIN 7 DAYS. DURING THE STORM SEASON,
Runoff with-dement /,t ,,,�s `, sr i ALL SLOPES SHALL BE STABILIZED 24 HOURS PRIOR TO A PREDICTED STORM EVENT.CONSTRUCTION SITES SHALL
'�� / s„'' tzs6A BE REVEGETATED AS EARLY AS FEASIBLE AFTER SOIL DISTURBANCE AND WITHIN 7-DAYS OF COMPLETION.
V OveNlo -Filtered water /' �'`� A'a '1 " 1266.6 12 X, °1 ~ 7.FILL SLOPES AT THE TRACT PERIMETER MUST DRAIN AWAY FROM THE TOP OF THE SLOPE AT THE
- - ,,'`
f CONCLUSION OF EACH WORKING DAY.
Y
12
fIr // 'r,, A x 1. � B.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND HAVE SIGNS POSTED ON THE SITE TO WARN AGAINST PUBLIC
;14t zua,n TRESPASS INTO AREAS WHERE WATER IS IMPOUNDED.
' + :X 7�i x 2 �,\\ 9.DUST SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY WATERING OR OTHER METHODS APPROVED BY THE CITY
ar
4 1� ENGINEER.
t 10. PLACEMENT OF DEVICES TO REDUCE EROSION DAMAGE WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE
•• rr// tza.' +2 xs q '' I 12tlJ tasx.c SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLAN.
I 11.DESILTING FACILITIES AT ALL DRAINAGE INLETS FOR THE GRADED SITE SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR A
-Scdknent / / F 10 ! 10 125X trQ !,• TWENTY-FIVE (25)YEAR.SIX(6)HOUR STORM INTENSITY.THEY MUST BE DETAILED ON THE
126,51 � ,� PLANS.DESIGN AND SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR THE FOLLOWING:
WcedwonreF C+om ie /j x o� ! ee,lf A a) DESILTING BASIN VOLUME BASED ON GRADIENT AND NATURE OF SOILS.
ell, 10 Aef.a i 66� THE EXTENT OF ALL GRADED AREAS AND IDENTIFICATION OF ANY TEMPORARY SOIL STABILIZATION
% rzcs. � A b)
TYP- FUTURE CATCH BASIN INLET / / f 2667 ' +:5 5 - x MEASURES.
-Curb ..........:.
�!"- \ s c) SIZE OF DESILTING BASIN OUTLET PIPE AND OVERFLOW.
B PROTECTION f� ��// j lzus'a e / /' "' � ' ' i i z � d) DIKE REQUIREMENTS.SHOW MINIMUM WALL WIDTH,SLOPE OF WALLS,PERCENT COMPACTION,ETC.
x
/ x 12(•4 12 \ !, 1261.5 % t r;: e) OUTLET CONDITIONS FROM THE DESILTING BASIN SHALL NOT EXCEED DOWNSTREAM LIMITATIONS,
NOT TO SCALE // f"" `y �� 1 z x " WITH THE EXCEPTION OF OVERFLOW,WHICH IS TO BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE CAPACITY OF 1.5
CASQA 5E-10 DRAIN INLET PROTECTION-TYPE 4 / 1266 9 / txex� A TIMES THE MAXIMUM DESIGN.FLOW.
j i"` as lx5' W ! �"-'- A 12. NECESSARY MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON-SITE AND AT CONVENIENT LOCATIONS TO FACILITATE RAPID
x
/ 12sa. / �_ i CONSTRUCTION OF TEMPORARY DEVICES OR TO REPAIR ANY DAMAGED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WEN A 50%
;I
CHANCE OR GREATER OF RAIN WITHIN A 48 HOUR PERIOD IS FORECAST FOR LAKE ELSINORE BY THE NATIONAL,
NOAA.OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC AGENCY f0 ! ze ( )
=sx`+ \ 1 t2o%.9 j , 13. BMP'S SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND INSPECTED DAILY.ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES
A / SHOWN SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WEN THE FIVE(5) DAY RAIN PROBABILITY
FORECAST EXCEEDS FIFTY PERCENT(50%).
zsxs 14. AFTER A RAINSTORM ALL PROJECT GENERATED SILT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM CHECK BERMS,
ONSITE PUBLIC DRAINS AND PIPES, DRAINS AND PIPES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND DESILTING BASINS AND THE BASINS PUMPED DRY. ANY GRADED SLOPE BMP'S DAMAGED DURING A RAINSTORM SHALL ALSO BE
/ 1P + 1ztlWa lzsea 10 ". i..XN IMMEDIATELY REPAIRED.FAILURE TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE MAINTENANCE MAY RESULT IN PENALTIES.
f ,! // 15. DISCHARGING OF CONTAMINATED SOILS VIA SURFACE EROSION IS PROHIBITED.
16. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS POINTS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH A COMBINATION OF ROCK AND SHAKER PLATES
/ � f� ^';• x 1• � YEAR-ROUND TO PREVENT TRACK-OUT. ROUTINE STREET SWEEPING SHALL BE PERFORMED ON ALL PAVED
sse.x
12Ne..9 \ i STREETS WHERE TRACKING IS OBSERVED . VACUUM SWEEPERS SHALL BE USED WHEN STREET SWEEPING
/, F ss.
/// ,/ .�J/ 1Assr �✓�zs'' � xs x � � � ��' 1zsk9 BECOMES INEFFECTIVE.
12sa.6 /
I2dPn ;, x NPDES / STORM WATER_POLLUTION NOTES:
� lzeys x ' _/ 1 s.3 i2
40 11 y t2ena x 1.THE DEVELOPER AND HIS CONTRACTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SWPPP-APPROVED,
/ / ® 12tiQ5J' �J x x PRE-QUAUFlED BMP'S FROM THE CALIFORNIA STORM WATER QUALITY ASSOCIATION(CASOA)HANDBOOK I WEBSITE FOR CONSTRUCTION
X TO RETAIN SEDIMENTS FROM AREAS DISTURBED ONSITE TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE. THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
12fX s !r 1 i !� j / tzsa.9 s5 INCLUDE THOSE SHOWN ON THIS PLAN AND APPLICABLE SWPPP AS WELL AS ANY ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (E.C.,
t:�sx.v / T
l \ x HYDROSEEDING MULCHING OF STRAW, GRAVEL-BAGGING DIVERSION DITCHES, RETENTION BASINS, ETC.) DICTATED BY FIELD
/+(sn
1 z9
' / / '" 126s.5 `^'^••._::�'� ^ %' 12�.7 x x OR DEBRIS INTO EXISTING PUBLIC STREETS AND/OR ONTO
' ''r'av ,r" CONDITIONS TO PREVENT EROSION AND/OR THE INTRODUCTION OF DIRT,MUD ND/0
/ x !~~ ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS,
1244 � / / 1asn.5 2 2.STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) SHALL BE KEPT ON-SITE AND MADE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST OF A
t2 x / / 1270.7 'r1,.`` ! ^ ( x A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE REGIONAL WATER QUAUTY CONTROL BOARD (RWQCB) - SANTA ANA REGION AND/OR THE CITY OF LAKE
>< / 12s.7 / / ELSINORE.
12ex5 ':�\> 126sq + 41P ii x 'zl+x'�s ,®fig 3.CONSTRUCTION SITES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN SUCH A CONDITION THAT AN ANTICIPATED STORM DOES NOT CARRY WASTES OR
sa., 1e,e POLLUTANTS OFF THE SITE. DISCHARGES OF MATERIAL OTHER THAN STORM WATER (NON-STORM WATER) ARE PROHIBITED EXCEPT AS
\`� 12'7•"•+ - x i AUTHORIZED BY AN INDIVIDUAL NPDES PERMIT UNDER THE STATEWIDE GENERAL PERMIT-CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY.
/' j125;• �' \\ i'^�/' ,! ° � � � 4.POTENTIAL POLLUTANTS INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED T0: SOLID OR LIQUID CHEMICAL SPILLS;
z WASTES FROM PA% 127n INTS, STAINS, SEALANTS SOLVENTS DETERGENTS GLUES LIME, PESTICIDES HERBICIDES, FERTILIZERS, WOOD x ° PRESERVATIVES,AND ASBESTOS FIBERS,PAINT FLAKES OR STUCCO FRAGMENTS; FUELS, OILS LUBRICANTS,AND HYDRAULIC,RADIATOR
/ / s
+✓ x'n.e i ! "'""� � OR BATTERY FLUIDS; CONCRETE AND RELATED CUTTING OR CURING RESIDUES; FLOATABLE WASTES; WASTES FROM ENGINE/EQUIPMENT
-•' -'-•~\�� ��/ 4 4 x f ! STEAM CLEANING OR CHEMICAL DEGREASING; WASTES FROM STREET CLEANING; AND SUPER-CHLORINATED POTABLE WATER FROM LINE
- - x FLUSHING AND TESTING. DURING CONSTRUCTION,
ON, DISPOSAL OF SUCH ORMERI E SHOULD OCCUR L A SPECIFIED AND CONTROLLED
'sxs TEMPORARY
STATE ANDTE FEDERALCALLY REOUIREMENTS SEPARATED FROM POTENTIAL STORM WATER RUNOFF, WITH ULTIMATE DISPOSAL IN ACCORDANCE
5.RUNOFF FROM EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLE WASHING SHALL BE CONTAINED AT CONSTRUCTION SITE AND MUST NOT BE DISCHARGED TO
RECEIVING WATERS OR THE LOCAL STORM DRAIN SYSTEM.
ELIMINATE
\ / f0 x t
x` 6.APPROPRIATE BMPS FOR CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIALS,WASTES, SPILLS
�! i ,-.•-"' OR REDUCE TRANSPORT FROM THE SITE TO STREETS,DRAINAGE FACILITIES,OR ADJOINING PROPERTIES BY WIND OR RUNOFF.
tz'n.2 , 7.MATERIAL STORAGE AND STAGING AREAS SHALL BE ESTABLISHED.FUEL TANK,PORTABLE TOILETS,LIQUIDS,GELS AND POWDERS SHALL
x , � HAVE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AND BE STORED AWAY FROM ALL PRIVATE I PUBLIC STORM WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS SIDEWALKS
'- x �1z.7 RIGHTS-OF-WAYS AND FLOW-LINES.
x a 5v.a
�. ess a.
x B.ALL PORTABLE MIXERS SHALL HAVE PLASTIC LINERS UNDERNEATH WITH GRAVEL BAGS PLACES ON
•,p-"• --' ��� -,.� / --� P THE DOWN-HILL SIDE OF THE UNERS TO CONTAIN DISCHARGES.
r
^e:; '/,' ,•„"" 1z71.a 1 H.6 9.CONTROLLED STREET WASHING WILL ONLY BE ALLOWED PRIOR TO THE APPLICATION OF ASPHALT SEAL COATS AND ONLY WHEN ALL
y ,ze9s / 127'.5 I x x PERTINENT DRAINAGE INLETS ARE PROTECTED.
LEGEND x \ d 11 10. ALL CONSTRUCTION CONTACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTOR PERSONNEL ARE TO BE MADE AWARE OF THE REQUIRED BMPS AND GOOD
♦ i nt� /� ASSOCAHOUSEKETEDNG MEASURES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION STAGING ROJECTAREAS.
SITE AND ANY
--1-;,, 1272.E'
~\\ x 1271,9 11.DISCHARGING CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER PRODUCED BY DEWATERING GROUNDWATER THAT HAS INFILTRATED INTO THE CONSTRUCTION
MASTER DEVELOPER INSTALLED WALLrsr:„ \ x , SITE IS PROHIBITED. DISCHARGING CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER PRODUCED BY DEWATERING ACTIVITIES MAY REQUIRE A NATIONAL
aooa AND FENCE-SEE MASTER DEVELOPER `~C r 2705 / POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM(NPDES)PERMIT FROM THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD.
LANDSCAPE PLANS 1z7. O\ �. <-'?.7F ........ / x A 12. STORM WATER RUNOFF SHALL NOT BE DIRECTED OVER ANY SLOPES WITHOUT PERMANENT DOWN DRAINS INSTALLED. EROSION AND
- SEDIMENT CONTROLS INCLUDING MAINTENANCE ARE REWIRED ON ALL EXPOSED SLOPES UNTIL SUFFICIENT PERMANENT LANDSCAPING HAS
GRAVEL BAGS ~^^'�`, / vs BEEN ESTABLISHED. 100%SLOPE PROTECTION MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
13. VEGETATION CLEARING AND BRUSHING ACTIVITIES SHALL NOT BE INITIATED DURING THE WET SEASON ON ANY SITES WHICH ARE NOT
ADEQUATELY PROTECTED NTH DESILTING BASINS OR OTHER TEMPORARY DRAINAGE OR CONTROL MEASURES.
14. STOCKPILES OF SOIL SHALL BE PROPERLY SECURED WITH BMP'S TO ELIMINATE OR REDUCE SEDIMENT TRANSPORT FROM THE
SITE TO STREETS,DRAINAGE FACILITIES OR ADJACENT PROPERTIES VIA RUNOFF, VEHICLE TRACKING,OR WIND.STOCKPILES INACTIVE FOR
>; A PERIOD OF 14 DAYS OR MORE MALL BE COVERED; ACTIVE STOCKPILES SHALL BE COVERED PRIOR TO A FORECASTED RAIN.
N ��•� x / 15. SPECIAL ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO PREPARATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE RAIN EVENT ACTION PLAN (REAP) AS REQUIRED
. - BASED ON SITE RISK LEVEL OR AS MANDATED BY THE SANTA ANA REGIONAL BOARD NPDES PERMIT, GENERAL PERMIT- CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION NOTES : y7x s ACTIVITIES.
10 INSTALL SINGLE GRAVEL&G ROW PER DETAIL A" �� ' 16. AT THE END OF EACH DAY OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY,ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND WASTE MATERIALS SHALL BE
HEREON GRAPHIC SCALE \^,,41 9' COLLECTED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN TRASH OR RECYCLE BINS.
/'/ 17. THIS SITE HAS OBTAINED A NATIONAL POLLUTION PREVENTION ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT TO REGULATE MUNICIPAL AND
11 INSTALL SILT FENCE PER DETAIL ON SHEET 2. eoo aao
INDUSTRIAL STORM WATER DISCHARGES.
NPOES WDID/8 33C358736 DATE WDID ISSUED: 06/23/10
INSTALL FUTURE CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION PER CASQA tvz x
1z71.5 18. THE UNDERSIGNED CIVIL ENGINEER, A QUALIFIED OSP AND/OR QSD WILL REVIEW PLACEMENT OF EROSION CONTROL AND INSURE THAT
12 -
SE-10 AND DETAIL '8'HEREON. ( IN FEET) WORK IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS.
M 1 inch= Bo ft. �(� <', N/ 08/12/13
MARK T.MIKAMI R.C.E.NO,45985 EXP.12/31/14 DATE
�AI�Jf7 Qv 8 i2( //3
ENGINEERING GEOLOGISTS SOILS ENGINEER OWNER
REVISIONS: PREPARED UNDER SUPERVISION OF: SCALE: ��®® WILSON M►KAMI CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
o 111
PFOFES I -y w
SOILWORKS, INC. SOILWORKS, INC. McMILLIN SUMMERLY, LLC �s91�W�A/ 8/12/13 11 CORPORATION SHEET B
s EARTH SCIENCES GROUP EARTH SCIENCES GROUP P.O.BOX 85104 SCE NO 49984NEXP. 9-3o-1a DATE
DATE' 3 PETERS CANYON T: 949-679-6090 ROUGH GRADING PLAN
§ 350 FISCHER AVENUE 350 FISCHER AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92186-5104 �» No.4Bae4' SUITE 110 Fo 949-679-0091 OF 8
e.c a�u * THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN RENEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE IRVINE CA 9260E
8 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 T 619 794-1252 APPROPRIATE CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT AND/OR CITY AND
ri ( ) MARK DESCRIPTION BY APPR. DATE 'fl C1V1L \�' THE STATE LAWS,AND PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. RIVERSIDE BENCHMARK NO.BM E-3-70.EIEV.1279.829. BRASS DISC IN CONCRETE POST 72'NORTH OF Y TRACT NO. 31920-8 FILE NO.
v PH: 714 668-5600 PH: 714 668-5600 F(619) 336-3010 pF �p�F INR9tSEC110N OF CORYDON STREET AND MISSION TRAIL 2T FAST OF THE CENTERLINE OF MISSION TRAIL
www.soilworksinc.com DESIGNED BY: WMC DRAWN BY: WMC % :• CASS ENTERLINEEOF CEREAL STREET,8ENC N5752'18^N,BETWEEN MONUMENTS 3 AND 4,SONG THE CENT RUNE LOTS 1-64 IOq
CHECKED BY: S.WILSON PROJECT MANAGER:S.WILSON KEN SEUMALO RCE 56915 EXP.6-30-1t CITY ENGINEER DATE I CTIM OF CEREAL SIR AND STONEMAN STREET AND CEREAL STREET AND CORYDON STREET.