Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-17-16^LLrtl1E f :LSltltll\E .q;l t,r,-r..a.t :.{i t, I i,rl. City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Thursday, November 17, 201G CALL TO ORDER A Regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore was held in the Cultural Center, 185 North Main Street, on the above date. The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m.by Chairman Armit. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Armit ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Carroll, Ross and Klaarenbeek; Chairman Armit and Vice-Chair Gray PUBLIC COMMENTS _ NON AGENDIZED ITEMS - 3 M!NUTES Appearing to comment was. Debra Fitzpatrick had questions regarding the Re-Zoning of the East Lake District. Community Development Director Taylor notified Fitzpatrick that there would be a Scoping Meeting Thursday, December lstat 5 pm. lt is a preview of Environmental lmpact Report that show would show the proposed Land Uses. Any questions or concerns can be addressed at that time. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM(S) 1) Approval of Minutes - October 18, 2016. It was moved by Commissioner Ross, seconded by Vice-Chair Gray, and carried to approve meeting minutes. PUBLIC HEARING !TEM(S} 2) Planninq Application No. 2016-64: A Request bv Beazer Homes for The Approval of Buildinq Desion and Construction of 63 Sinqle Familv Residential Units. The Public Hearing was opened at 6:05 p.m. There were no conflict of interest disclosures. Administrative Clerk Wells affirmed receipt of Proof of Publication and noted that no correspondence had been received. Principal Planner Kirk presented the staff Report. Kirk explained that Condition of Approval No. 35 and 41 should be removed. They are standard building Conditions that are typically applied to High Density Residential, Commercial or lndustrial Uses. Staff is recommending striking these two Conditibns of Approval. Applicant Rudy Proovost (project manager) was available for questions. There were no members of the public appearing to comment. Klaarenbeek questloned applicant about Vinyl Fencing. He recommended that the applicant look at commercial grade fencing for longevity and to prevent sagging. Kirk responded that could be added as a Condition of Approval. Chairman Armit asked the applicant if they would be willing to stagger the few two story homes in between the single story homes. Applicant Proovost agreed. There were no members of the public appearing to comment. The Public Hearing was declared closed at 6:19 p.m. It was moved by Commissioner Klaarenbeek, seconded by Commissioner Carroll and unanimously carried, to adopt both resolutions. Resolution 2016- 76: ADOPT, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPT FINDINGS THAT PLANNING APPLICATION 2016.64IS CONSISTENTWITH THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) Resolution 2016-77: ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION 2016.64 PROVIDING BUILDING DESIGNS FOR 63 SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS, FOR TRACT NO, 31 920.10, LOCATED IN THE SUMMERLY DEVELOPMENT OF THE EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN. The Public Hearing was opened at 6:22 p.m. There were no conflict of interest disclosures. Administrative Clerk Wells affirmed receipt of Proof of publication. Commissioner Klaarenbeek notified the Commissioners that Eric Werner (applicant) emailed him and said he would be available for any questions or concerns Klaarenbeek may have. Klaarenbeek replied to applicant and stated that he would contact him if he had any questions. There was no further conversation with the applicant. Commissioner Carroll said the applicant also reached out to him for any questions or concerns. The applicant extended an invitation to Carroll to take a tour of the facility. Carroll stated he took him up on his offer to tour the mine. There was no further conversation with the applicant and noted the following correspondence had been received. Commissioner Ross stated he received an email with concerns from a Pastor who lives in the area. 3) Page | 2 chairman Armit stated he received he received the same email as commissioner Ross. All disclosures, concerns and questions were addressed in the meeting. Principal Planner Kirk presented the staff Report. The applicant thanked staff for their time and effort. He briefed the Commissioner's on a background of the project. Werner stated they are trying to refrne their operations and become as efficient aJpossible and give some assurance that they will not be impacting roads in the Community. Applicant said they would be willing to provide any additional buffering on the project if the Planning Commission and Ciiy Council feel strongly about it. Werner encouraged Commrssioner's to address iny concerns they may have and him and his team will clarify any issues they may have. Members of the Public who appeared to speak were: Jeanie corral and Linda Ridenour. Principal Planner Kirk responded to questions the speakers had. Commissioner's discussed concerns and questions with the applicant. Chairman Armit would like a Condition of Approval to bed added that states: Upon approval by OMR of Reclamation Plan Amendment No. 2015-01, Amendment No. 2, within 36 months' application for vacalion of mining on the southern site shall be applied for. Prior to the approval of any Land Use determinations or Land Use entitlements the OMR Amendment shall be approved. There being no further discussion on this matter, Chairman Armit closed the Public Hearing was at 8:12 p. m. It was moved by Vice-Chair Gray, seconded by Commissioner Ross and unanimously carried to adopt all four Resolution's No. 2016-78-81 (as identified in the staff report) *with added Condition of Approval that would require vacation of mining on the South Nichols Rd. site application to OMR within 36 Months of approval of Reclamation Plan 2015-01 , Amendment No. 2, there shall be no Land use entrtlements approved for the South site until that amendment has been approved. Resolution 20'16-78. ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORINA, CERTIFY THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) (SCH 2006051034) FOR SURFACE MINING PERMIT 2015-01 AND RECLAMATION PLAN 2006-01 AMENDMENT NO.2. Resolution 2016-79: ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ADOPT FINDINGS THAT SURFACE MINING PERMIT 2015.01 AND RECLAMATION PLAN 2006.01 AMENDMENT NO, 2 ARE EXEMPT FROM THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP); AND, Resolution 2016-80: ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVAL OF SURFACE MINING PERMIT 2015-01, Resolution 2016-81: ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Page | 3 APPROVAL OF RECLAMATION PLAN 2006-01 AMENDMENT NO, 2, STAFF COMMENTS Community Development Director Taylor invited the Commission to come to the East Lake Specific Plan EIR scoping meeting on Thursday, December 1,2016 al5:00 p.m. in the Cultural Center. Principal Planner Krrk said the next big project, Artisan Alley will go before Planning Commission, as well as two separate large residential subdivisions. COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS The Commissioner's thanked the applicants and staff for all their hard work. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 8:21 p.m. to Tuesday, December 6, 2016, in the Cultural Center, 185 N. Main Street. Adam Armit Chair Page I 4 .4 -t/1tt---'