Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTTM 36624 Trieste Residential Project Traffic Impact Analysis - Orig. October 8, 2013 URBAN CRC3SSRC3ADS Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project City of Traffic Impact Analysis Lake October Elsinore, California urbanxroads.com 08850-03 A�! L4URBAM CROSSROADS 41 Corporate Park, Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92606 Prepared by: Marlie Whiteman, P.E. John Kain, AICP Janette Cachola ..J ,k Exp.4 30 .r Al TRfir � Prepared for: Mr. Mark Rosene MBK HOMES 4 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Irvine, CA 92614 TRIESTE RESIDENTIAL (TTM 36624) PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA October 8, 2013 JN: 08850-03 Report MW:JK:JC MBK HOMES �a BUILDING HAPPINL`.;; IL October 9, 2013 Carole Donahoe, AICP, Project Planner R City of Lake Elsinore Cl7-Y OF gCE1 QED 130 South Main Street LAKE SLS/A10RE Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 OCT ] 62013 RE: Trieste TTM 36624 VIS�ON Reports & 300' Labels �NG'N�ER�NG Dear Carole: � At your request, please find the attached documents in supplement to MBK Homes T TM 36624 submittal.- 0 3 copies of the Exterior Noise Analysis for MBK Homes by BridgeNet International • 2 copies of the 300' radius maps and labels for MBK Homes by First American Title along with the property owner's certification by First American Title. • 2 copies of the Traffic Impact Analysis for MBK Homes by Urban Crossroads. I am in receipt of your letter dated October 8, 2013 and will be providing your office with updated landscape plans at your request. It is my request that we maintain tna October 31, 2013 date for DRC while we continue to develop the landscape plans in question. I would like some additional direction in regard to the development of the sales trailer and model home complex landscaping. I am available at your convenience and look forward to discussing these additional landscape plans with you. Should you have any questions or comments, or require any additional information, please feel free to contact my office at 949.789.8372. Sincerely yours, MBK h OM"_'a SOUTHERN CA, Ltd Mark Rosene Project Manager CC: File:Trieste 75:22.1 4 Park Plaza,Suite 1000,Irvine,CA 92614 • Phone:949-789-8300 • Fax:949-789-9300 - www.MBKHomes.com 1 � _ 1 • i • Q7 1 � , 10 i far ? • N M 0 �. -1 it Cl (• \\ J 1 I a 1 1 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Paqe 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Overview...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Analysis Scenarios................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Study Area................................................................................................................................ 3 1 A Summary of Project and Cumulative Impacts ........................................................................ 5 1.5 On-Site Roadway and Site Access Improvements................................................................. 6 2.0 METHODOLOGIES.............................................................................................. 7 2.1 Level of Service........................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Intersection Capacity Analysis................................................................................................. 8 2.2.1 Signalized Intersections 2.2.2 Unsignalized Intersections 2.3 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Methodology......................................................................... 9 2.4 LOS Criteria ............................................................................................................................. 10 2.5 Thresholds of Significance ...................................................................................................... 11 3.0 AREA CONDITIONS............................................................................................ 13 3.1 Existing Circulation Network ...................................... ........................................................._ 13 3.2 City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Circulation Element........................................................ 13 3.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities............................................................................................. 13 3.4 Transit Service......................................................................................................................... 13 3.5 Existing Traffic Counts............................................................................................................. 21 3.6 Existing Conditions Intersection Operations Analysis ............................................................ 21 3.7 Existing Conditions Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis............................................................. 26 4.0 PROJECTED FUTURE TRAFFIC ........................................................................... 27 4.1 Project Trip Generation............................................................................................................ 27 4.2 Project Trip Distribution ........................................................................................................... 27 4.3 Modal Split................................................................................................................................ 27 4.4 Project Trip Assignment........................................................................................................... 30 4.5 Background Traffic................................................................................................................... 30 4.6 Cumulative Development Traffic............................................................................................. 34 4.7 Traffic Forecasts ...................................................................................................................... 34 4.8 Near-Term (2015) Conditions.................................................................................................. 34 Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAW City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN:06650-03 Report) TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) Section Paqe 5.0 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS..................................................... 39 5.1 Roadway Improvements.......................................................................................................... 39 5.2 Existing Plus Project Traffic Volume Forecasts...................................................................... 39 5.3 Intersection Operations Analysis............................................................................................. 39 5.4 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis............................................................................................... 39 5.5 Project Impacts and Recommended Improvements.............................................................. 44 6.0 OPENING YEAR (2015) TRAFFIC ANALYSIS................................................... 47 6.1 Roadway Improvements.......................................................................................................... 47 6.2 Opening Year (2015) Without Project Traffic Volume Forecasts........................................... 47 6.3 Opening Year(2015) With Project Traffic Volume Forecasts................................................ 47 6.4 Intersection Operations Analysis............................................................................................. 47 6.5 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis ............................................................................................... 55 6.6 Near-Term Cumulative Impacts and Recommended Improvements.................................... 55 7.0 LOCAL CIRCULATION AND SITE ACCESS .......................................................... 57 8.0 LOCAL AND REGIONAL FUNDING MECHANISMS............................................... 59 8.1 Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program.......................................................59 8.2 City of Lake Elsinore Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Program.........................................................59 Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN:08850-03 Report) OURBAN LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix Page Approved Traffic Study Scoping Agreement ............................................................................................ 1.1 TrafficCount Data —September 2013....................................................................................................... 3.1 Existing (2013) Conditions Intersection Operations Analysis Worksheets............................................... 3.2 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Worksheets ............................................................................................. 3.3 Existing plus Project Conditions Intersection Operations Analysis Worksheets...................................... 5.1 Opening Year (2015) Without Project Conditions Intersection Operations Analysis Worksheets........... 6.1 Opening Year(2015) With Project Conditions Intersection Operations Analysis Worksheets................ 6.2 Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis URBAN City of Lake Elsinore,CA(JN.08850-03 Report) GROSSROAIDS LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit Paqe 1-1 Preliminary Site Plan................................................................................................................... 2 1-2 Location Map............................................................................................................................... 4 3-1 Existing Number Of Through Lanes and Intersection Controls................................................. 14 3-2 City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Circulation Element............................................................ 15 3-3 City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Roadway Cross-Sections ................................................. 16 3-4 Riverside County General Plan Circulation Element................................................................. 17 3-5 Riverside County General Plan Roadway Cross-Sections........................................................ 18 3-6 Existing Pedestrian Facilities...................................................................................................... 19 3-7 Existing Transit Services............................................................................................................. 20 3-8 Existing (2013) Average Daily Traffic (ADT) .............................................................................. 22 3-9 Existing (2013) AM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes................................................................ 23 3-10 Existing (2013) PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes................................................................ 24 4-1 Project Trip Distribution............................................................................................................... 29 4-2 Project Only Average Daily Traffic (ADT)................................................................................... 31 4-3 Project Only AM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes.................................................................... 32 4-4 Project Only PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ....................................................................... 33 4-5 Cumulative Development Location Map .................................................................................... 35 5-1 Existing plus Project Average Daily Traffic (ADT)...................................................................... 40 5-2 Existing plus Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes....................................................... 41 5-3 Existing plus Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes....................................................... 42 Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBANCity of Lake Elsinore,CA(JN:08850-03 Report) LIST OF EXHIBITS (CONT.) Exhibit Paqe 6-1 Opening Year (2015) Without Project Average Daily Traffic (ADT) .......................................... 48 6-2 Opening Year (2015) Without Project Weekday AM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes........... 49 6-3 Opening Year(2015) Without Project Weekday PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes........... 50 6-4 Opening Year (2015) With Project Average Daily Traffic (ADT) ............................................... 51 6-5 Opening Year(2015) With Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes................................. 52 6-6 Opening Year(2015) With Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Volumes................................. 53 7-1 On-Site Circulation Recommendations....................................................................................... 58 Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBANCity of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN:08850-03 Report) LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1-1 Intersection Analysis Locations ..................................................................................................... 5 2-1 Signalized Intersection LOS Thresholds....................................................................................... 8 2-2 Unsignalized Intersection LOS Thresholds................................................................................... 9 2-3 Thresholds of Significance............................................................................................................. 11 3-1 Intersection Analysis for Existing (2013) Conditions..................................................................... 25 4-1 Project Trip Generation Rates and Summary............................................................................... 28 4-2 Summary of Cumulative Development Projects ........................................................................... 36 5-1 Intersection Analysis for Existing plus Project Conditions............................................................ 43 5-2 Summary of LOS by Individual Turning Movements for Existing Plus Project Conditions.................................................................................................... 45 6-1 Intersection Analysis for Opening Year (2015) Conditions........................................................... 54 6-2 Summary of LOS by Individual Turning Movements for Opening Year (2015) Conditions................................................................................................... 56 Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAMCity of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN.08850-03 Report) TRIESTE RESIDENTIAL (TTM 36624) PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA 1 .0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of the traffic impact analysis (TIA) for the proposed Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) development (referred to as "Project"), southeast corner of the intersection of Central Avenue (SR-74) and Rosetta Canyon Drive in the City of Lake Elsinore as shown on Exhibit 1-1. The purpose of this traffic impact analysis is to evaluate the potential impacts to traffic and circulation associated with the development of the proposed Project, and recommend improvements to mitigate impacts considered significant in comparison to established regulatory thresholds. 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW The Project is proposed to consist of 75 single family detached residential dwelling units. For the purpose of this analysis, the Project is anticipated to be developed in a single phase with a projected Opening Year of 2015. Trips generated by the Project's proposed land uses have been estimated based on trip generation rates collected by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and published in their most current edition of the Trip Generation manual, 9" Edition, 2012. The Project is estimated to generate a total of approximately 714 net trip-ends per day on a typical weekday with approximately 56 net weekday AM peak hour trips, 75 net weekday PM peak hour trips. The assumptions and methods used to estimate the Project's trip generation characteristics are discussed in detail in Section 4.1 Project Trip Generation of this report. 1.2 ANALYSIS SCENARIOS Potential impacts to traffic and circulation were assessed for each of the following conditions: • Existing (2013) Conditions (1 scenario) • Existing plus Project Conditions (E+P) (1 scenario) • Opening Year (2015), Without and With Project (2 scenarios) — ambient growth and cumulative development projects (EAC and EAPC) Information for Existing (2013) is disclosed to represent the baseline traffic conditions as they existed at the time this report was prepared. The Existing (2013) plus Project (E+P) analysis determines direct project-related traffic impacts that would occur on the existing roadway system in the scenario of the Project being placed upon Existing (2013) conditions. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore,CA(JN 08850-03 Report) 1 EXHIBIT 1-1 SITE PLAN 1` A �I,y `� t 1, --A+( � i��,_ •1`� l , - -1 MT { ` �j 1. N t. ' sh ---— - � AR n1iMlV()()U --{UAY 7 Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAM City of Lake Elsinore,CA(JN-08850.01) C-RossRC>^DS 2 The Opening Year (2015) conditions analysis will be utilized to determine if improvements funded through local and regional transportation mitigation fee programs such as the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program, City of Lake Elsinore Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program, or other approved funding mechanism can accommodate the near-term cumulative traffic at the target LOS identified in the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. If the "funded" improvements can provide the target LOS, then the Project's payment into the TUMF and TIF will be considered as cumulative mitigation through the conditions of approval. Other improvements needed beyond the "funded" improvements (such as localized improvements to non-TUMF or non-TIF facilities) are identified as such. To account for background traffic, traffic forecasts have been based upon two (2) years of background (ambient) growth at 2% per year for 2015 traffic conditions. The ambient growth factor is intended to approximate regional traffic growth. The total ambient growth is 4.04% for 2015 traffic conditions (compounded growth of two percent per year over two years or 1.022 Yea`,). This ambient growth rate is added to existing traffic volumes to account for area-wide growth not reflected by cumulative development projects. Ambient growth has been added to daily and peak hour traffic volumes on surrounding roadways, in addition to traffic generated by the development of future projects that have been approved but not yet built and/or for which development applications have been filed and are under consideration by governing agencies. 1.3 STUDY AREA The traffic impact study area was defined in coordination with the City of Lake Elsinore. Based on discussions with City staff, the study area includes any intersection of"Collector" or higher classification street, with "Collector" or higher classification streets, at which the proposed project will add 50 or more peak hour trips. Exhibit 1-2 presents the study area and intersection analysis locations. It should be pointed out that the "50 peak hour trip" criteria utilized by the City of Lake Elsinore is consistent with Riverside County traffic study guidelines, and generally represents a threshold of trips at which a typical intersection would have the potential to be impacted. Although each intersection may have unique operating characteristics, this traffic engineering rule of thumb is a widely utilized tool for estimating a potential area of impact (i.e., study area). To ensure that this TIA satisfies the needs of the City of Lake Elsinore, Urban Crossroads, Inc. prepared a Project traffic study scoping agreement for review by City staff prior to the preparation of this TIA. The agreement provides an outline of the Project study area, trip generation, trip distribution, and analysis methodology. The agreement approved by the City of Lake Elsinore is included in Appendix 1.1". The following four (4) Project study area intersection locations shown on Exhibit 1-2 and listed on Table 1-1 were selected for this TIA based on the following: (1) City's TIA analysis methodology that requires analysis of intersection locations with 50 or more peak-hour Project trips and (2) input from the City of Lake Elsinore Traffic Engineering Division. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis ��URBAN City of Lake Elsinore. CA(JN. 08850-03 Report) 3 CROSSROADS EXHIBIT 1-2 LOCATION MAP 00 ' ►//fir- .;w"-� � . .''. SITE \`�, \`sue i.e� `d. \: .� I � 1 / &L LEGEND: © =EXISTING INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATION 1Q =FUTURE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATION -— — =FUTURE PROJECT DRIVEWAY Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:01) 4 Table 1-1 Intersection Analysis Locations ID Intersection Location Jurisdiction 1 Central Avenue (SR-74) /Ardenwood Way Caltrans 2 Central Avenue (SR-74) /Rosetta Canyon Drive Caltrans 3 Sunblaze Road— Driveway 1 / Rosetta Canyon Drive Lake Elsinore 4 Ardenwood Way / Driveway 2 Lake Elsinore 1.4 SUMMARY OF PROJECT AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS This section provides a summary of project-related impacts and associated mitigation measures. Section 2.0 Methodologies provides information on the methodologies used in the analyses and Section 5.0 Existing Plus Project Traffic Analysis includes the detailed analysis. Based on the assessment of E+P traffic conditions, the Project's potential impact to the intersection of Sunblaze Road / Rosetta Canyon Drive was found to be significant. Based on the assessment of Opening Year (2015) traffic conditions, there are no new intersections in addition to the intersection identified under E+P conditions that was found to have Project-related cumulative impact. Section 6.0 Opening Year (2015) Traffic Analysis includes the detailed analysis results. Cumulative impacts are deficiencies that would not be directly caused by the Project. In 2003, the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program was implemented in Western Riverside County. Under the TUMF, developers of residential, industrial and commercial property are required to pay a development fee to fund regional transportation projects, which mitigates cumulative impacts to the roadway segments and intersections included in the TUMF program. The TUMF funds both local and regional arterial projects. The applicant shall participate in the funding of off-site improvements, including traffic signals that are needed to serve cumulative traffic conditions through the payment of required Western Riverside County TUMF, in addition to City of Lake Elsinore Traffic Impact Fees (TIF) and other fair share contributions as directed by the City. These fees are collected as part of a funding mechanism aimed at ensuring that regional highways and arterial expansions keep pace with the projected vehicle trip increases. Funding programs are further discussed in Section 8.0 Local and Regional Funding Mechanisms of this TIA. As development increases within the region, the amount of fees collected also increases thereby accelerating the construction of transportation facilities included in each funding program. Similarly, if development within the region experiences reduced growth, the amount of fees collected also is reduced. However, a slower growth cycle would likely result in a slower growth in traffic volumes, thereby lengthening the timeline necessary to complete transportation infrastructure improvements. Intersection and roadway improvements that were identified in the analysis found in Section 6.0 Opening Year (2015) Traffic Analysis as necessary to maintain or improve the operational level of service of the street system in the vicinity of the project site. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis ��URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(M 08850-03 Report) 5 CROSSROADS 1.6 ON-SITE ROADWAY AND SITE ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS The Project is proposed to have access on Rosetta Canyon Drive and Ardenwood Way. Both Project access points are proposed to be full-access. Regional access to the Project site will be provided by the I- 15 Freeway (located to the west) via Central Avenue (SR-74). On-Site roadway and site-access improvements necessary to provide site access and on-site circulation are assumed to be constructed in conjunction with site development and are described below and discussed in detail in Section 7.0 Local Circulation and Site Access. The construction of on-site and site adjacent improverents shall occur in conjunction with adjacent Project development activity or as needed for Project access purposes. These improvements should be in place prior to occupancy. The recommended site access driveway improvements for the Project are described below. Sunblaze Road-Driveway 1 /Rosetta Canyon Drive (#3) — The following intersection improvemerts a � 4 are recommended: ? �) r �I ,tsa PIS 4)'0 • Subject to the approval of City Traffic Engineer, install an all-way stop control., • Construct Driveway 1 as 2-lane roadway with one northbound shared left-through-right turn lane and one southbound receiving lane. On-s-z AL, 1LT -rOO-� t • Modify westbound striping on Rosetta Canyon Drive to provide a dedicated westbound left turn lane to serve the Project. Ardenwood Drive/Driveway 2 (#4)—The following intersection improvements are recor{imended: 6 • Install a stop control on the eastbound approach i V ' • Construct Driveway 2 as a 2-lane roadway with one eastbound shared left-through-right turn lane and one westbound receiving lane. The Project Driveway should be clear of any objects (such structures, trees, or equipments) that would interfere with sight distance standards. On-site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the Project site. Sight distance at each project access point should be reviewed with respect to standard Caltrans and City of Lake Elsinore sight distance standards at the time of preparation of final grading, landscape and street improvement plans. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN:08850-03 Report) 6 CROSSROADS 2.0 METHODOLOGIES This section documents the methodologies and assumptions used to perform this TIA. 2.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE Traffic operations of roadway facilities are described using the term "Level of Service" (LOS). LOS is a qualitative description of traffic flow based on several factors such as speed, travel time, delay; and freedom to maneuver. Six levels are typically defined ranging from LOS "A", representing completely free-flow conditions, to LOS "F representing breakdown in flow resulting in stop-and-go conditions. LOS "E" represents operations at or near capacity, an unstable level where vehicles are operating with the minimum spacing for maintaining uniform flow. 2.2 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS The definitions of LOS for interrupted traffic flow (flow restrained by the existence of traffic signals and other traffic control devices) differ slightly depending on the type of traffic control. The LOS is typically dependent on the quality of traffic flow at the intersections along a roadway. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) (Transportation Research Board 2000) methodology expresses the LOS at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control. 2.2.1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS The City of Lake Elsinore requires signalized intersection operations analysis based on the methodology described in Chapter 16 of the HCM. Intersection LOS operations are based on an intersections average control delay. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. For signalized intersections LOS is directly related to the average control delay per vehicle and is correlated to a LOS designation as described in Table 2-1. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis �� URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN. 08850-03 Report) 7 CRC) --RC1ADS Table 2-1 Signalized Intersection LOS Thresholds Level of Average Control Service Description Delay (Seconds) A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or short cycle length. 0 to 10.00 B Operations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or short cycle lengths 10.01 to 20.00 C Operations with average delays resulting from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths 20.01 to 35.00 Individual cycle failures begin to appear. D Operations with longer delays due to a combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle 35.01 to 55.00 lengths, or high V/C ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. Operations with high delay values indicating poor progression, long cycle lengths: and high 55.01 to 80.00 E V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. Operation with delays unacceptable to most drivers occurring due to over saturation, poor 80.01 and up F progression, or very long cycle lengths Source, HCM 2000, Chapter 16 The peak hour traffic volumes have been adjusted using a peak hour factor (PHF) to reflect peak 15 minute volumes. Common practice for LOS analysis is to use a peak 15-mintue rate of flow. However, flow rates are typically expressed in vehicles per hour. The PHF is the relationship between the peak 15-minute flow rate and the full hourly volume (e.g. PHF = [Hourly Volume] / [4 x Peak 15-minute Flow Rate]). The use of a 15-minute PHF produces a more detailed analysis as compared to analyzing vehicles per hour. Existing PHFs have been used for all analysis scenarios. 2.2.2 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS The City of Lake Elsinore requires the operations of unsignalized intersections be evaluated using the methodology described in Chapter 17 of the HCM. The LOS rating is based on the weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle (see Table 2-2). At two-way or side-street stop-controlled intersections, LOS is calculated for each controlled movement and for the left turn movement from the major street, as well as for the intersection as a whole. For approaches composed of a single lane, the delay is computed as the average of all movements in that lane. For all-way stop controlled intersections, LOS is computed for the intersection as a whole. All unsignalized study area intersections have utilized the Traffix software (Version 8.0 R1, 2008). Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAM City of Lake Elsinore. CA(JN. 08850-03 Report) 8 Table 2-2 Unsignalized Intersection LOS Thresholds Level of Average Control Service Description Per Vehicle(Seconds) A Little or no delays. 0 to 10,00 B Short traffic delays. 10.01 to 15 00 C Average traffic delays. 15 01 to 25.00 D Long traffic delays. 25.01 to 35.00 E Very long traffic delays. 35.01 to 50.00 F Extreme traffic delays with intersection capacity exceeded >50,00 Source, HCM 2000, Chapter 17 2.3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The term "signal warrants" refers to the list of established criteria used by Caltrans and other public agencies to quantitatively justify or ascertain the potential need for installation of a traffic signal at an otherwise unsignalized intersection. This TIA uses the signal warrant criteria presented in the latest edition of the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), as amended by the 2012 California MUTCD (CA MUTCD), for all study area intersections. The signal warrant criteria for Existing (2013) conditions are based upon several factors, including volume of vehicular and pedestrian traffic, frequency of accidents, and location of school areas. Both the FHWA's MUTCD and the 2012 CA MUTCD indicate that the installation of a traffic signal should be considered if one or more of the signal warrants are met. Specifically, this TIA utilizes the Peak Hour Volume-based Warrant 3 as the appropriate representative traffic signal warrant analysis for Existing (2013) traffic conditions. Warrant 3 criteria are basically identical for both the FHWA's MUTCD and the 2012 CA MUTCD. For the purposes of this study, the speed limit was the basis for determining whether Urban or Rural warrants were used for a given intersection. For future (new) unsignalized intersections, future traffic conditions have been assessed regarding the potential need for new traffic signals based on future average daily traffic (ADT) volumes, using the Caltrans planning level ADT-based signal warrant analysis worksheets. Traffic signal warrant analyses were performed for the following unsignalized study area intersections: ID Intersection_ Location Jurisdiction 3 Sunblaze Road — Driveway 1 / Rosetta Canyon Drive Lake Elsinore 4 Ardenwood Way / Driveway 2 Lake Elsinore Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis �� URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JM 08850-03 Report) 9 CROSSROADS The Existing (2013) conditions traffic signal warrant analysis is presented in the subsequent section, Section 3.0 Area Conditions of this report. The traffic signal warrant analysis for future conditions is presented in Section 5.0 Existing plus Project Traffic Analysis, and Section 6.0 Opening Year (2015) Traffic Analysis. It is important to note that a signal warrant defines the minimum condition under which the installation of a traffic signal might be warranted. Meeting this threshold condition does not require that a traffic control signal be installed at a particular location, but rather, that other traffic factors and conditions be evaluated in order to determine whether the signal is truly justified. It should also be noted that signal warrants do not necessarily correlate with level of service. An intersection may satisfy a signal warrant condition and operate at or above LOS "D" or operate below LOS "D" and not meet a signal warrant. 2.4 LOS CRITERIA The definition of an intersection deficiency in the City of Lake Elsinore is based on the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Circulation Element. The City of Lake Elsinore General Plan states that target LOS "D" be maintained along City roads (including intersections) wherever possible. As an exception, the City's General Plan allows for LOS "E" operations in the Historic Area of the City within the Main Street overlay and the City's Ballpark District. 2.5 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE This section outlines the significance criteria used in this analysis relating to roadway system impacts. The Criteria are based on California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). For the purposes of this analysis, the following thresholds of significance have been utilized to determine whether the addition of project traffic at a study intersection results in a significant project- related impact: • A significant project-related impact occurs at a study intersection if the addition of project- generated trips reduces the peak hour level of service of the study intersection to change from acceptable level of service (i.e., LOS "A", "B", "C" or "D") to an unacceptable level of service (i.e., LOS "E" or "F"); • A significant project-related impact occurs at a study intersection if the project-generated trips worsen the pre-project level of service grade at a deficiently operating (i.e., LOS "E" or "F") intersection by the values shown in Table 2-3. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis ��URBAN City of Lake Elsinore,CA(JN:08850-03 Report) 10 CROSSROADS Table 2-3: Thresholds of Significance Pre-Project LOS Project-Related Delay Increase Mitigation Measure E 2.0 Seconds or More Achieve pre-project delay or better F 1.0 Second or More Achieve pre-project delay or better The proposed significance thresholds have been applied to the study area intersections for the purposes of determining project-related impacts through a comparison of peak hour operations under Existing (2013) and Existing Plus Project traffic conditions. A significant cumulative impact is identified when a facility is projected to operate below the level of service standards due to local and regional traffic growth (i.e., cumulative development and ambient growth) along with the addition of project traffic. A project's contribution to a cumulatively significant traffic impact can be reduced to less-than-significant if the Project is required to implement or fund its fair share of improvements designed to alleviate the potential cumulative impact. If full funding of future cumulative improvements is not reasonably assured, a temporary unmitigated cumulative impact may occur until the needed improvement is fully funded and constructed. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis ��URBAN City o/Lake Elsinore, CA(JN:08850-03 Report) CRoS5R0-^DS 11 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 12 3.0 AREA CONDITIONS This section provides a summary of the existing circulation network, the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Circulation Network, and a review of existing peak hour intersection operations, roadway analyses and traffic signal warrants. 3.1 EXISTING CIRCULATION NETWORK Pursuant to the Traffic Study Scoping Agreement (Appendix 1.1") and discussion with the City of Lake Elsinore staff, the study area includes a total of four (4) existing and future intersections as shown on Exhibit 1-2. Exhibit 3-1 illustrates the study area intersections located near the proposed Project and identifies the number of through traffic lanes for existing roadways and intersection traffic controls. 3.2 GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT As previously noted, the Project site is located within the City of Lake Elsinore. Exhibit 3-2 shows the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Circulation Element, and Exhibit 3-3 illustrates the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan roadway cross-sections. Exhibit 3-4 shows the Riverside County General Plan Circulation Element, and Exhibit 3-5 illustrates the Riverside County General Plan roadway cross- sections. 3.3 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES Existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities (e.g., crosswalks, sidewalks, bike lanes, bus stops, etc.) within the study area are shown on Exhibit 3-6. As shown in Exhibit 3-6, Central Avenue (SR-74) currently has an existing bike lane within the study area. 3.4 TRANSIT SERVICE The study area is currently served by the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) with bus service along Central Avenue (SR-74) via Route 22. Exhibit 3-7 illustrates the RTA bus routes for the study area. Transit service is reviewed and updated by RTA periodically to address ridership, budget and community demand needs. Changes in land use can affect these periodic adjustments which may lead to either enhanced or reduced service where appropriate. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBANCity of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN:08850-03 Report) 13 EXHIBIT 3-1 EXISTING NUMBER OF THROUGH LANES AND INTERSECTION CONTROLS t 1 t_t_ � � , r• � / ttt�.�Win• i _ !_ / ��t` 3� �' A / �:j .�y �•� •. SPEELeaD 400-•. a �, IS f /^ :�' a P, i� •,.'. ��t �• ���'�la„ �,,-�•' �? SPEED •.,"t-' -� SITE 40 \ .: �..� Ile SPEEDIMIT 60 �i' `< `� o1 t► ♦ ��.• O 1 Central Av.(SR-74)(NS) 2 Central Av.(SR-74)(NS) 3 Sunblase Rd.-Dwy.1 (NS) 4 Ardenwood Wy.(NS) LEGEND: i Ardenwood Wy.(EW) A Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) i Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) i Dwy.2(EW) =TRAFFIC SIGNAL i =STOP SIGN i+L `i L _ T J L INTERSECTION 4 =NUMBER OF LANES (DIRT) / # —�i DOES NOT EXIST D =DIVIDED U =UNDIVIDED o ~1= 3 DEF =DEFACTO RIGHT TURN LANE ie Q =INTERSECTION ID Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:01) 14 MJ=Z • T ILL R p1A I 12 Fn N . N �S���F� yy{{ ZE M:�W 049, �V LU W �vurur+D-120 t ,6 !\ ,+ �`� ♦ Yy V 0 U �V V ' ' h d • • SpVol W Y44 lS� fo py �N1� aP °bwr� rocs f y h It r 9t P ? r R11UNpD W Z U d < E i U F- W F- N S 3 m *# ci vi 3 3 W a�i 2 `pro �`p� 5 �o Z \ N a �-• 0 3 s < o0G � S ° a-mu u 3 L a� m Q 15 -_ EXHIBIT 3-3 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS 104' 110' 6' 6' 14 1 11 1 1' 1 12' T 1 7' 1 12' 1 11' 11' 1 14' 6' 1 6' I SW AUGMENTED URBAN ARTERIAL -STATE HIGHWAY_ ("ANE) 120' 6' 6' 6' 1 12' 11' ,2' 7' 7' 1 12' 1 11' 1 12 1 6' SW DIKE EDIAN 1111KI! sW LANE LANE RAIsEO) URBAN ARTERIAL HIGHWAY (6-LANE( 100' 69' 6' 1 S' 6' 1 15' 1 12' 1 114' 1 12' 1 15' 1 G' S't S' sW SIKE DIKE aW Ah! AN! MEDIAN MAJOR HIGHWAY (4-LANE) 60' I 71 I 'ttir' 1 14 , 1 5' S' DIKE s MEDIAN LANE SECONDARY HIGHWAY (4•LANE) 7a' 56' MIN, I O 2' 12' 2 0 6 5 sW AINT O aw If P I NTEO DIVIDED COLLECTOR Sines USE SHOULDER (2-LANE) 66' 68, �1 II 6W 2 2 1 2 I 2 5 t W 6W e1K,12 A. ED 12 II(C 5 tJw LAN! lAN! COLLECTOR HIGHWAY COLLECTOR HIGHWAY (4•LANE) 8q (?-LANE) I 5 4' 6' 1 12' 1 121 12' 1 6' 4' Iaw NEW SPECIAL ROADWAY gHOV Df REINE LANE (2-LANE) (PROPOSED FOR LAKESHORE DRIVE IN THE COUNTRY CLUB HEIGHT DISTRICTI 'BIKE LANES ARE NOT MANDATORY UNLESS SHOWN ON THE BIKEWAY CIRCULATION ELEMENT PLAN PRECISE SIDEWALK LOCATION SUBJECT TO CITY ENGINEER APPROVAL NOTE CHECK THE DISTRICT PLAN OF YOUR AREA FOR ANY REQUIRED SPECIAL ROADWAY CROSS-SECTION, ESPECIALLY THE LAKE EDGE AND COUNTRY CLUB HEIGHTS DISTRICT PLANS. STRIPING OF COLLECTOR HIGHWAY AS DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINEER. SOURCE.,CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN(ADOPTED 12-13-2011) Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:03) 16 EXHIBIT 3-4 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT t 1 � r r _ is low ' I I IT5SR4W T6SR5W I 4_L SITE* - - 1— -- — Y La e Lake Isinore \ a TM3W \`M4W MR6W I�� I I I I I v \ T7SRiSW 77SRIIW nsRaw I I ! I Murrieta T?MIN t ana>_ Expressway 0 84'ROW) �. BridSq O Area plan Boundary a� Urban Arterial(152'ROW) Moreno Valley m San Somard'mo Arterial(128'ROW) ComidorAhmm6va I_ Towmhip Major(I 18'ROW) section Hemet to Comm/Lake Blainore - — Secondary(109 ROW) � (Corridor Ahemalim - Wata Collector(74'ROW) Mountain Arterial(I I V ROW) ! "79 Re alignment Altematirea (� city FreewayI _ _1 Proposed I° �ng° 1 . SOURCE; RIVERSIDE COUNTY INTEGRATED PROJECT(RCIP) i Railroad Q E404lolmchange (OCTOBER 7.2003) Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAMCity of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:04) 17 EXHIBIT 3-5 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE GENERAL PLAN ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS W 220'-184' -- R/W 134' -- _ - lir r 0'. r-4Y�—l2'�--12'T Ir 7 7'--14•---T-12• —12' 12' 10' 16' . 19, - - 2% CURB T CURB 2% POTENTIALTRANSTIWAY CURBED MEDIAN POTENTIAL TRANSIrwAY EXPRESSWAY - 6 TO B LANES MEDIAN WIDTH MAY VARY FROM 14•TO 62' RIW ----- --__ _- _. 15Y R/W 7' 15' —t 2% CURBS CURB 296 CURBED MEDIAN URBAN ARTERIAL NIGNWAY • R/W - 128' R/W 21' - 86' 21' —is,— 9' 14' 12'----8' 6' 216 CUR ___CURB -1------15'--- 2% CURBED MEDIAN AM- NIGIBIIAT R/W 11r- - -- -1yw I zr 76' 21'1r 21A PAINTED MEDIAN 21A MAWR NIGNWAT-4 LAN R/W 110'- - pJW 1 15' a• 1 a' -12, J 12' 1r 1 r a• 1s, i MOUNTAIN ARMAL - 2 TO 4 LAW rs 2 LANE SECTION w/.W low R/1w 13'-- -T s'1 -ir t- 12' 1Y 1r 12' a S. 13' 2% 2% air— SECONDARY NIGNWAY -- 7r — 5r r-,-r-i-1w-�-12�-12—t-1:•—T-1o• rT s' 2% PAINTED MEDIAN 2'A INDUSTRIAL COLLECTOR COLLECTOR IYW —74' R/W 1 S'— 44 15' it I 6'- 10' 1 12' 1 12' I 10' r 2% 2% COLLECTOR IMPROVEMENTS MAYBE RECONFIGURED TO ACCOMMODATE EXCLUSWE SOURCE:COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE *ORALTERNATIVEUWEARRANCEMENTSADOITONAL RIGHTOF WAYMAYBEREOUIREDS AT INTERSECTIONS TO ACCOMMODATE ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENTS FOR STATE HIGHWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CALTRANS DESIGN STANDARDS Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBANCity of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:05) 18 EXHIBIT 3-6 EXISTING PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES •.�� , V JP 17 Fi F � � • •��� p���, �\\ �1'" rr i• ;r I J, ; . SITE ot LEGEND: Q =INTERSECTION ID =BUS STOP =BIKE LANE =SIDEWALK =CROSSWALK Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAM City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:01) CRCMSR0^DS 19 EXHIBIT 3-9 EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICES *N1 1 / 4 r ~ G ! 1 -> i 4 : • ,�,, .:' SITE s WN • ' ~^ - /lam . •4 Jw\ •\ / `• ^ w! LEGEND: Q =INTERSECTION ID =RTA ROUTE 22 O =BUS STOP Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBANCity of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:01) 20 3.5 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS The intersection LOS analysis is based on the traffic volumes observed during the peak hour conditions using traffic count data collected in September 2013. The following peak hours were selected for analysis: • Weekday AM Peak Hour (peak hour between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM) • Weekday PM Peak Hour (peak hour between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM) Manual weekday AM and PM and peak hour turning movement counts were conducted in September 2013. The weekday AM and PM peak hour count data is representative of typical weekday peak hour traffic conditions in the study area. There were no observations made in the field that would indicate atypical traffic conditions on the count dates, such as construction activity or detour routes. The raw manual peak hour turning movement traffic count data sheets are included in Appendix "3.1 Existing (2013) average daily traffic (ADT) volumes on arterial highways throughout the study area are shown on Exhibit 3-8. Existing (2013) ADT volumes are based upon factored intersection peak hour counts collected by Urban Crossroads, Inc. using the following formula for each intersection leg: PM Peak Hour(Approach Volume + Exit Volume) x 12 = Leg Volume Based on a comparison of PM peak hour traffic count data to 24-hour tube count data along roadway segments in close proximity to the study area, it was determined that the PM peak hour volumes were approximately eight (8) to nine (9) percent of the total 24-hour daily volume on select segments. As such.. it was determined that the above equation could be utilized to approximate the ADT volume on the study area segments based on the same relationship (i.e., 8-9 percent PM peak-to-daily relationship). Existing (2013) weekday AM and PM peak hour intersection volumes are shown on Exhibit 3-9 and Exhibit 3-10, respectively. 3.6 EXISTING CONDITIONS INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Existing (2013) peak hour traffic operations have been evaluated for the study area intersections based on the analysis methodologies presented in Section 2.2 Intersection Capacity Analysis of this report. The intersection operations analysis results are summarized in Table 3-1. The Existing (2013) conditions operations analysis shows that all study area intersections appear to currently operate at acceptable LOS (i.e., LOS "D" or better) during the peak hours. The intersection operations analysis worksheets are included in Appendix "3.2" of this TIA. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBANCity of Lake Elsinore,CA(JN:08850-03 Report) 21 EXHIBIT 3-8 EXISTING (2013 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT ;A' / e; � I f- I. V 12 r 0�11 A� SITE LEGEND: 10.0 =VEHICLES PER DAY(1000'S) Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850.,07) OURBAN CRC>55RC�^DS 22 EXHIBIT 3-9 EXISTING 2013 AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOL ME 2 -1 e'. ' INC 01, \ \ owl SITE 10,E \ s .10001, f .,V 1 Central Av.(SR-74)(NS) 2 Central Av.(SR-74)(NS) 3 Sunblase Rd.-Dwy.1 (NS) 4 Ardonwood Wy.(NS) i Ardonwood Wy.(EW) i Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) i Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) 8 Dwy.2(EW) in C-'92 J L. f-304 J L -374 INTERSECTION 68 DOES NOT EXIST 14 3 e^0 N Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:06) OURBAN 23 EXHIBIT 3-10 EXISTING 2013 PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES Ili;./ • I J - r t r .n', ♦ P i �• pit `� o / or 4. .� A• �. SITE >i 110, �. �.. , rZ, 1 1 Central Av.(SR-74)(NS) 2 Central Av.(SR-74)(NS) 3 Sunblaze Rd.-Dwy.1(NS) 4 Ardenwood Wy.(NS) 8 Ardenwood Wy.(EW) A Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) 8 Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) i Dwy.2(EW) r' (V `11 cOP 4 16 20, �1rJ f—� �► t 117 J �. —78 INTERSECTION 65-1 DOES NOT EXIST n.- Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAM City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:06) 24 Table 3-1 Intersection Analysis for Existing (2013) Conditions Intersection Approach Lanes Delay 2 Level of Traffic Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound (secs.) Service # Intersection Contro13 L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM 1 Central Av (SR-74)/Ardenwood Wy. TS 1 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 18.9 16.8 B B 2 Central Av,(SR-74)/Rosetta Cyn. Dr TS 0 3 d 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 21.7 16.4 C B 3 Sunblaze Rd /Rosetta Cyn Dr, CSS 0 0 0 1 0 d 1 2 0 0 2 0 29.6 10.5 D B 4 Ardenwood Wy./Dwy 2 Intersection Does Not Exist - When a right turn is designated,the lane can either be striped or unstriped To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left, T = Through, R = Right, d=Defacto Right Turn Lane Per the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual,overall average intersection delay and level of serv,ce are shown for intersections with a traffic signal or all-way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control,the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement(or movements sharing a single lane)are shown BOLD=LOS does not meet the applicable jurisdictional requirements(i.e..unacceptable LOS), TS=Traffic Signal;CSS=Cross-Street Stop Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project TIA OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN:08850) CRossRosaD% C:IDocuments and SettingsgcacholaUesklop109850-04 Repor113-1 25 3.7 EXISTING CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS Traffic signal warrants for Existing traffic conditions are based on existing peak hour intersection volumes. For Existing (2013) conditions, there are no study are intersections that currently appear to warrant a traffic signal (see Appendix "3.3"). Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN 08850-03 Report) 2G 4.0 PROJECTED FUTURE TRAFFIC This section presents the traffic volumes estimated to be generated by the Project, as well as the Project's trip assignment onto the study area roadway network. The Project is proposed to consist of 75 single family detached residential dwelling units. For the purpose of this analysis. the Project is anticipated to be developed in a single phase with a projected Opening Year of 2015. The Project is proposed to have access on Rosetta Canyon Drive and Ardenwood Way. Both Project access points are proposed to be full-access. Regional access to the Project site will be provided by the I- 15 Freeway (located to the west) via Central Avenue (SR-74). 4.1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Trip generation represents the amount of traffic which is both attracted to and produced by a development. Determining traffic generation for a specific project is therefore based upon forecasting the amount of traffic that is expected to be both attracted to and produced by the specific land uses being proposed for a given development. Trip generation rates used to estimate Project traffic and summary of the Project's trip generation are shown on Table 4-1. The trip generation rates are based upon data collected by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) for a single family detached residential (ITE Land Use Code 210) in their recently published Trip Generation manual, 9`' Edition, 2012. As shown in Table 4-1, the Project is estimated to generate a total of approximately 714 net trip-ends per day on a typical weekday with approximately 56 net weekday AM peak hour trips, 75 net weekday PM peak hour trips. 4.2 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION The project trip distribution and assignment process represents the directional orientation of traffic to and from the project site. Trip distribution is heavily influenced by the geographical location of the site, the location of surrounding uses, and surface roadway characteristics such as proximity to the regional highway/freeway system. The travel patterns were developed in coordination with City staff when determining the limits of the study area. The project traffic distribution pattern is shown on Exhibit 4-1. 4.3 MODAL SPLIT The traffic reducing potential of public transit, walking or bicycling have not been considered in this TIA. Essentially, the traffic projections are "conservative" in that these alternative travel modes might be able to reduce the forecasted traffic volumes. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis ��URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN. 08850-03 Report) 27 GROSSROA1>S Table 4-1 Project Trip Generation Summary Trip Generation Rates' Weekday ITE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use CODE Quantity` In Out Total In Out Total Daily Single Family Detached 210 75 DU 0.19 0.56 0.75 0.63 0 37 1.00 9.52 Trip Generation Total Weekday ITE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use CODE Quantity- In Out Total In Out Total Daily Single Family Detached 210 75 DU 14 42 56 47 28 75 714 TOTAL 14 42 56 47 28 75 714 Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE),Trip Generation Manual,9th Edition(2012). 2 DU=Dwelling Unit Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project TIA OURBArd City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN.08850) CRosSRosaos C:0ocaments and settmgsvcacholaloesktop108850-04 Repor?W l p 28 EXHIBIT 4-1 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AVIr ' ``• / a. At qt r - SITE J i \ • .,.. _ • o �. ---- gy a r LEGEND: 10=PERCENT TO/FROM PROJECT Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:01) OURBAN 29 4.4 PROJECT TRIP ASSIGNMENT The assignment of traffic from the Project area to the adjoining roadway system is based upon the Project trip generation, trip distribution, and the arterial highway and local street system improvements that would be in place by the time of initial occupancy of the Project. Based on the identified Project traffic generation and trip distribution patterns, Project (2015) average daily traffic (ADT) volumes for the weekday are shown on Exhibit 4-2. Project (2015) weekday AM and PM peak hour volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-3 and Exhibit 4-4, respectively. 4.5 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Future year traffic forecasts have been based upon two (2) years of background (ambient) growth at 2% per year for 2015 traffic conditions. The ambient growth factor is intended to approximate regional traffic growth. The total ambient growth is 4.04% for 2015 traffic conditions (compounded growth of two percent per year over two years or 1.02' years). This ambient growth rate is added to existing traffic volumes to account for area-wide growth not reflected by cumulative development projects. Ambient growth has been added to daily and peak hour traffic volumes on surrounding roadways, in addition to traffic generated by the development of future projects that have been approved but not yet built and/or for which development applications have been filed and are under consideration by governing agencies. According to information published by the Riverside County Center for Demographic Research (RCCDR) and used as the basis for completing the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) TUMF Nexus Study — 2009 Program Update, the population of Western Riverside County is projected to increase by 62% in the period between 2007 and 2035, a compounded rate of approximately 1.73% annually. During the same period, employment in Western Riverside County is expected to increase by 111% or 2.71% compounded annually. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) recently adopted 2012 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) growth forecasts for the period between 2008 and 2035. According to information published by SCAG, the population of the City of Lake Elsinore is projected to increase by 87% in the period between 2008 and 2035, a compounded rate of approximately 2.34% annually. During the same period, employment in the City of Lake Elsinore is expected to increase by 95% or 2.51% compounded annually. Therefore, the use of an annual growth rate of 2.0 percent would appear to conservatively approximate the anticipated regional growth in traffic volumes in the City of Lake Elsinore, when considered along with the addition of Project-related traffic and traffic generated by other known development projects. As such, the growth in traffic volumes assumed in this traffic impact analysis would tend to overstate as opposed to understate the potential impacts to traffic and circulation. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis ��URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN:08850-03 Report) 30 CROSSROADS EXHIBIT 4-2 PROJECT ONLY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) Mir oft Or r ►4 �: •1 S o , 16 �~ SITE ,v%At :y. .,� LEGEND: 10.0 =VEHICLES PER DAY(1000'S) NOM =NOMINAL,LESS THAN 50 VEHICLES PER DAY Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:07) 31 EXHIBIT 4-3 PROJECT ONLY AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES W � v ,- SITE 1§0/1 ..' b. XF4' 1 Central Av.(SR-14)(NS) 2 Central Av.(SR-14)(NS) 9 Sunblase Rd.-Dwy.1(NS) 4 Ardenwood Wy.(NS) &Ardenwood Wy.(EW) S Rosetta Cy.Dr.(EM i Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) Y Dwy.2(EW) Olt. -4N 4 24 i co Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAWCity of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:06) 32 EXHIBIT 4-4 PROJECT ONLY PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 1 I .. , • r Al, t �. at:- _ ( ire ;'r ♦ Q /. ♦�� •' i' of /� A. or •1 1 y` r SITE .......:::....: r T r �, It#f Ilk 1 Central Av.(SR-74)(NS) 2 Central Av.(SR-74)(NS) 3 Sunbla:e Rd.-Dwy.1(NS) 4 Ardenwood Wy.(NS) i Ardenwood Wy.(EW) i Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) i Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) &Dwy.2(EW) v�u> �-3 vsin !_3 M �. f-13 �. f-5 f-4 ------ f f f -# f' '1 12 13--t Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:06) CR40sSR01^0S 33 4.6 CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC CEQA guidelines require that other reasonably foreseeable development projects which are either approved or being processed concurrently in the study area also be included as part of a cumulative analysis scenario. A cumulative project list was developed for the purposes of this analysis through consultation with planning and engineering staff from the City of Lake Elsinore. Exhibit 4-5 illustrates the cumulative development location map. A summary of cumulative development land uses are shown on Table 4-2. 4.7 TRAFFIC FORECASTS To provide a comprehensive assessment of the potential project-related and cumulative traffic impacts, the "buildup" method is performed in support of this work effort. The "buildup" method is used to approximate traffic forecasts for both E+P and Opening Year (2015) traffic conditions. The E+P scenario is intended to identify the significant Project impacts associated with the proposed Project while the Opening Year(2015) scenario is intended to identify near-term cumulative impacts on both the existing and planned near-term circulation system. The E+P traffic conditions include existing traffic in addition to the traffic generated by the proposed Project. The Opening Year (2015) traffic conditions include background traffic, traffic generated by other cumulative development projects within the study area and the traffic generated by the proposed Project. 4.8 NEAR-TERM (2015) CONDITIONS The buildup approach combines existing traffic counts with a background ambient growth factor to forecast the near-term 2015 traffic conditions. An ambient growth factor of 4.04% accounts for background (area- wide) traffic increases that occur over time up to the year 2015 from the year 2013 (compounded two percent per year growth over a two year period). Traffic volumes generated by the Project are then added to assess the 2015 With Project traffic conditions. The 2015 roadway network is similar to the Existing (2013) conditions roadway network, with the exception of future driveways proposed to be developed by the Project. The near-term traffic analysis includes the following traffic conditions, with the various traffic components: • Opening Year(2015) Without Project o Existing 2013 counts o Ambient growth traffic (4.04%) o Cumulative Development Project traffic • Opening Year(2015) With Project o Existing 2013 counts o Ambient growth traffic (4.04%) o Cumulative Development Project traffic o Project traffic Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis ��URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JAI:08850-03 Report) 34 CROSSROADS EXHIBIT 4-5 CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MAP :3 w S� ■ E T , _ L 4 ' Fti ® S 6 i 4t ,c ON ` \ 11 E•A E . is 9 14 !Q Cumuiahve Deveiopmenl t5 1 � 19 11 1 t 16 Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:01) CROSSROADS 35 Table 4-2 Summary of Cumulative Development Projects No. Project Name Land Use Quantit ' 1 Greenwald` Shopping Center 104.450 TSF 2 Ramsgate Single Family Residential 1,012 DU Condo/Townhomes 120 DU Discount Superstore 151.397 TSF 3 Lake Elsinore Walmart Specialty Retail 5.3 TSF Fast-Food without Drive-Through 5.3 TSF Fast-Food with Drive-Through 6.8 TSF 4 Lennar(Tract 31792) Single Family Residential 191 DU 5 1400 Minthorn Street3 Single Family Residential 84 DU Single Family Residential 523 DU 6 Spyglass Rancho Condo/Townhomes 171 DU Shopping Center 145.00 TSF 7 South Shore I Tract 31593 ' Single Family Residential 521 DU South Shore II Tract 32013 ° Single Family Residential 400 DU 8 La Strada(Tract 32077) Single Family Residential 134 DU 9 Tuscan West Tract 25473 5 Single Family Residential 164 DU 10 Marina Village Condos Tract 33820 6 CondolTownhomes 94 DU Single Family Residential 170 DU Condo/Townhomes 250 DU Apartments 110 DU Office 54.600 TSF 11 Watersedge' Hotel 150 RM Boat/Watercraft Dealers&Service 50.000 TSF Mini-Warehouse(Boat&Watercraft Storage) 76,000 TSF Shopping Center 86,600 TSF Cottages by the Lake CondolTownhomes 169 DU 12 Tessera' Single Family Residential 90 DU 13 TAG Pro ert 6 New Car Sales 50.000 TSF 14 City Center Condosfi CondolTownhomes 144 DU 15 Lake View Villas Condo/Townhomes 155 DU CondolTownhomes 600 DU Hotel 150 RM 16 Diamond Specific Plan' General Office 425.000 TSF Shopping Center 472,000 TSF The Colon ° Apartments 211 DU Back Basin Specific Plan&East Lake Specific Single Family Residential 2,407 DU Plan CondolTownhomes 324 DU 17 Single Family Residential 506 DU John Laing Homes(Phase 2) CondolTownhomes 1,141 DU Apartments 308 DU Shopping Center 117.000 TSF Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project TIA OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN.08850) CROSSROA,oS U 1UcJobsl 08600-090001_086001068501E.rce1108850-04 Repor114-2 36 Table 4-2 Summary of Cumulative Development Projects No. Project Name Land Use Quantit ' Tract 29513 Single Family Residential 98 DU Tract 28658 Single Family Residential 141 DU 18 Plot Plan 18751 High Turnover Sit-Down Restaurant 6.959 TSF Tract 31345; KB Homes;Tract 32785, Plot Plan Single Family Residential 121 DU 1873 Apartments 96 DU 19 Plot Plan 20240 Shopping Center 250,000 TSF Canyon Hills Estates(Tract 34249) Single Family Residential 302 DU Canyon Hills(Multiple Tracts) Single Family Residential 2,700 DU 20 Apartments 1,575 DU Audie Murphy(Tract 36484) Single Family Residential 109 DU Audie Murphy(Tract 36485) Single Family Residential 1,003 DU 21 JGruneto Hills Single Family Residential 191 DU 22 Hotel at 17584 Lawrence Way Hotel 57 RM Single Family Residential 1,056 DU 23 Alberhill Ridge(Tract 35001) Apartments 345 DU Shopping Center 679.000 TSF General Office 679.000 TSF EL to Hills Single Family Residential 468 DU ' TSF=Thousand Square Feet;DU=Dwelling Unit;AC=Acres:STU=Students;VFP=Vehicle Fueling Positions 2 Source:Greenwald Avenue Commercial Center TIA, Urban Crossroads, Inc.,May 2008. 3 Source: 1400 Minthorn Street Traffic Study Report.ASM Consulting,August 2007, Source: Spyglass Ranch TIA(Revised),Kunzman Associates,February 2007. 5 Source: Porto Romano SP TIA(Revised),Urban Crossroads,Inc.,May 2007, 6 Source: Lake Elsinore TAG Property TIA(Revised), Urban Crossroads, Inc.,August 2008. Source: The Diamond Specific Plan TIA, Urban Crossroads,Inc.,April 2009. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project TIA ��► URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN:08850) CRo55RC3^E>S U WcJobs1_08600-090001 086001088501ExceA08850-04 RepoilW-2 37 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 38 5.0 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS In an effort to satisfy the CEQA Guideline section 15125(a), an analysis of existing traffic volumes plus traffic generated by the proposed Project (E+P) has been included in this analysis. This section discusses the traffic forecasts for Existing plus Project (E+P) conditions and the resulting intersection operations and traffic signal warrants. 5.1 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The lane configurations and traffic controls assumed to be in place for E+P conditions are consistent with those shown previously on Exhibit 3-1, with the exception of the following: • At project driveways and those facilities assumed to be constructed by the Project to provide site access are also assumed to be in place for E+P conditions only (e.g., intersection turn lane improvements at the Project driveways). 5.2 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS This scenario includes Existing (2013) traffic volumes plus Project traffic. Exhibit 5-1 shows the ADT volumes which can be expected for E+P traffic conditions. E+P AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibit 5-2 and Exhibit 5-3, respectively. 5.3 INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS E+P peak hour traffic operations have been evaluated for the study area intersections based on the analysis methodologies presented in Section 2.0 Methodologies of this TIA. The intersection analysis results are summarized in Table 5-1, which indicates that the southbound left turn movement at the intersection of Sunblaze Road / Rosetta Canyon Drive is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable LOS (LOS "E") during the AM Peak Hours. The intersection operations analysis worksheets for E+P conditions are included in Appendix "5.1" of this TIA. 5.4 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS Traffic signal warrants for E+P traffic conditions are based on E+P ADT volumes. For E+P conditions, there are no study area intersections that are anticipated to warrant a traffic signal (see Appendix"3.3"). Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis ��URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN:08850-03 Report) 39 CROSSROADS EXHIBIT 5-1 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT ONLY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) t�'Ir Ire at e* ►� r`, ram. `(vt" >v♦. - . . . ..\ 9 �. 1• � • Ate✓ - ii SITE \. �. mot♦. . . -. .. ... ...\� .,� � 00 110. \ `\� PAR 119A. M ,�, •tea •�.. ^`�; � LEGEND: 10.0 =VEHICLES PER DAY(1000'S) Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore,CA(JN-08850.07) 40 EXHIBIT 5-2 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT ONLY AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES r r , 04 r Ir /* / f r , / 7 a,: OW41 ^•. .nSITE 1 . . V da 1 Central Av.(SR-74)(NS) 2 Central Av.(SR-74)(NS) 3 Sunbla:e Rd:Dwy.1(NS) 4 Ardenwood Wy.(NS) i Ardenwood Wy.(EW) A Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) A Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) i Dwy.2(EW) 1 N^ � O t � 112 � � f-3;1 4 f— ------ 34 . 3- ,t^ 368+ � ' 24-1 co t CN 4 � Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:06) 41 EXHIBIT 5-3 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT ONLY PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES _ � > ► . . •,, �r � � ,its-�. , �f /s' % 00 i J1 op i..� ./ . ... .� ..•)'tom J -� SITE \ , - •;,% A 10 140010' . 1 Control Av.(SR-74)(NS) 2 Control Av.(SR-74)(NS) 3 Sunblaso Rd.-Dwy.1 (NS) 4 Ardenwood Wy.(NS) i Ardenwood Wy.(EW) i Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) i Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) i Dwy.2(EW) N g� 4 14 Ica, t-19 uoo .-78 iO -63 Lf-122 i-4 o. 11 3� 'on '�N � — ' 16� M� Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:06) CRosSRonoS 42 Table 5-1 Intersection Analysis for Existing Plus Project Conditions Existing(2013) Existing Plus Project Intersection Approach Lanes' Delay 2 Level of Delay 2 Level of Traffic Northbound SOUthbound Eastbound Westbound (secs.) Service (secs.) Service2 # Intersection Control' L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM 1 Central Av.(SR-74)/Ardenwood Wy, TS 1 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 18.9 16.8 B B 19.1 17.1 B B 2 Central Av (SR-74)/Rosetta Cyn. Dr, TS 0 3 d 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 21.7 16A C B 21.8 16,5 C B 3 Sunblaze Rd /Rosetta Cyn, Dr.° CSS 0 11 0 0 1 d 1 2 0 1 2 0 18.8 9.0 C A 26.0 10.8 D B Rosetta Cyn. Dr-(major approach)5 - - - - - - 1 2 0 1 2 0 9,1 75 A A 9.1 7.5 A A Sunblaze Rd.(minor approach)5 CSS 0 11 0 0 1 d - - - - - - 29.6 10,5 D B 39.4 109 E B With Improvement AWS 0 11 0 0 1 d 1 2 0 1 2 0 - 15,8 8,0 C A 4 Ardenwood Wy,/Dwy 2' CSS 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 Intersection Does Not Exist 9.1 8.8 A A Ardenwood Wy.(major approach)5 - 0 1 0 0 1 0 - - - - - - Intersection Does Not Exist 7.4 7.4 A A Dwy 2(minor approach)5 CSS - - - - - 0 1 l 0 1 0 0 0 Intersection Does Not Exist 1 9 1 1 8,8 1 A A When a right turn is designated,the lane can either be striped or unstriped To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes L = Left, T = Through; R = Right;d=Defacto Right Turn Lane;1=Improvement(Project Access) Per the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual,overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with a traffic signal or all-way stop control, For intersections with cross street stop control,see subsequent footnotes, BOLD =LOS does not meet the applicable jurisdictional requirements(i.e.,unacceptable LOS). BOLD =Significant Impact 1)the pre-Project condition is at or above LOS"D`and Project traffic causes deterioration below LOS"D"or 2)if the pre-Project condition is already below LOS"D"(i,e.,LOS"E"or"F")and the Project increases the delay by 2.0 seconds or more for LOS"E" or by 1.0 second or more for LOS"F",the impact is considered"significant". Consistent with City traffic study guidelines,the impact will be improved back to pre-project condition or better,thus reducing the Project's contribution to the impact to less-than-significant. TS=Traffic Signal,CSS=Cross-Street Stop;AWS=All-Way Stop ° LOS based on the average delay are shown, 5 LOS based on the worst individual movement(or movements sharing a single lane)on a major or minor approach operating condition(unsignalized intersection)are shown. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624) Project TIA City of Lake Elsinore, CA (JN:08850) (�► URBAN C.IDocuments and SettingsgcacholalDesktop108850-04 Reportl5-1 CR055R01AOS 43 5.5 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT IMPACTS AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS Sunblaze Road — Driveway 1 / Rosetta Canyon Drive (#3) — As mentioned previously, the southbound left turn movement at this intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable LOS (LOS °E") under E+P traffic conditions. At the southbound approach to this intersection, turning movements are controlled by an existing cross-street stop. The Project does not contribute to a traffic volume increase for the southbound left turns. Although the southbound left turn vehicles are projected to experience delays during the morning peak hour (see Table 5-2), physical improvements (such as adding capacity for the southbound left turns) do not solve this problem. Because of the Earl Warren Elementary School location nearby, the morning traffic volumes on Rosetta Canyon Drive impede the southbound left turn movements. Installation of a traffic signal at this location is not recommended because traffic volumes do not warrant signal control at this location. However, installation of an all- way stop would result in an acceptable LOS. The all-way stop may not be advisable due to its proximity to the existing traffic signal at Central Avenue to the west and Ardenwood Way to the east. Therefore, subject to the approval of City Traffic Engineer, installation of an all-way stop control is a potential Project mitigation for this intersection. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis ��URBAN City of Lake Elsinore,CA(JN:08850-03 Repott) 44 CROSSROADS Table 5-2 Summary of LOS by Individual Turning Movements for Existing Plus Project Conditions LOS By Turning Movement Overall Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Delay' Level of # Intersection L T R L T R L T R L T P, (secs.) Service' 3 Sunblaze Rd./Rosetta Cyn.Dr. AM Peak Hour With Project D D E B A A A A A A 39.4 E -With Improvements B 6 B B B C C C C 15.8 PM Peak Hour With Project B B B - A A A A A A A 10.9 B -With Improvements A A A A A A A A A A 8 0 A 4 Ardenwood Wy./Dwy 2 AM Peak Hour With Project A A A A A A 91 A. PM Peak Hour With Project I A A A A A A 8.8 A Per the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual,overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with a traffic signal or all-way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement(or movements sharing a single lane)are shown. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624) Project T!A �� URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA (JN.08850) CRossRosaos C1Documents and SettingsycacholaceskloplO&350-04 Repor16-2 45 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 46 6.0 OPENING YEAR (2015) TRAFFIC ANALYSIS This section discusses the methods used to develop Opening Year (2015) Without and With Project traffic forecasts, and the resulting intersection operations and traffic signal warrants. 6.1 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The lane configurations and traffic controls assumed to be in place for Opening Year (2015) conditions are consistent with those shown previously on Exhibit 3-1. with the exception of the following: • At project driveways and those facilities assumed to be constructed by the Project to provide site access are also assumed to be in place for Opening Year (2015) With Project conditions only (e.g., intersection turn lane improvements at the Project driveways). 6.2 OPENING YEAR (2015) WITHOUT PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS This scenario includes Existing (2013) traffic volumes plus an ambient growth factor of 4.04% plus traffic from pending and approved but not yet constructed known development projects in the area. The weekday ADT volumes which can be expected for Opening Year (2015) Without Project traffic conditions are shown on Exhibit 6-1. Exhibit 6-2 and Exhibit 6-3, shows the AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes for Opening Year (2015) Without Project traffic conditions. 6.3 OPENING YEAR (2015) WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS This scenario includes Existing (2013) traffic volumes, an ambient growth factor of 4.04%, traffic from pending and approved but not yet constructed known development projects in the area and the addition of Project traffic. The weekday ADT volumes which can be expected for Opening Year(2015) With Project traffic conditions are shown on Exhibit 6-4. Exhibit 6-5 and Exhibit 6-6, shows the AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes for Opening Year (2015) With Project traffic conditions. 6.4 INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Level of service calculations were conducted for the study intersections to evaluate their operations under Opening Year (2015) conditions with existing roadway and intersection geometrics consistent with Exhibit 3-1. The intersection analysis results are summarized in Table 6-1, which indicates that there are no new intersections anticipated to experience unacceptable LOS (i.e., LOS "E" or worse) in addition to the intersection identified under E+P traffic condition. The intersection operations analysis worksheets for Opening Year (2015) Without Project conditions are included in Appendix "6.1" of this TIA. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAri City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN:08850-03 Report) 47 CROSSROADS EXHIBIT 6-1 OPENING YEAR9AILY WITHOUT PROJECT AVE GEZ01 TRAFFIC (ADT) / / y ` ,. tit...• �.� �/ � . r SITE \: '�' ; .► ' - k• fir ....... :.. .'1-0 via ': .'':. \i - �►� T}�. + r 16 i 1.10i' ► LEGEND: 10.0 =VEHICLES PER DAY(1000'S) Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAM City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:07) CRosSROADS 48 EXHIBIT 6-2 OPENING YEAR (2015) WITHOUT PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 141 r Of Ap 10 y / ,\ •' SITE 10 .. I i' �, ,y/ ��`•�f •' \\ '-- _� �'"'/i �y• Cam, i1 I1 ./ 1 Central Av.(SR-74)(NS) 2 Central Av.(SR-74)(NS) 3 Sunblase Rd.-Dwy.1(NS) 4 Ardenwood Wy.(NS) 8 Ardenwood Wy.(EW) i Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) i Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) 8 Dwy.2(EW) 4-19 (-157 °�° 1_--50 �111 f•365 —437 INTERSECTION 38 4 DOES NOT EXIST r 403 - Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:06) CRo55Ronos 49 EXHIBIT 6-3 OPENING YEAR (2015) WITHOUT PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES r • � it r 01, r f � ♦.. . A. SITE00 \. r 1 Central Av.(SR-74)(NS) 2 Central Av.(SR-74)(NS) 3 Sunblase Rd:Dwy.I (NS) 4 Ardenwood Wy.(NS) a Ardenwood Wy.(EW) i Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) i Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) i Dwy.2(EW) N f—I64 113 INTERSECTION 79 DOES NOT EXIST o 152— Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:06) 50 EXHIBIT 6-4 OPENING YEAR C20 I WITH PROJECT AVERAGE DAIL TRAFFIC (ADT) rr r tit b Q A��( ''' t• is NX SITE ¢' °p ', •' � , /� .,, is �' LEGEND: 10.0 =VEHICLES PER DAY(1000'S) Trieste Residential(TI-M 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore,CA(JN-08850.07) CRCMSRo aDS 51 EXHIBIT 6-5 OPENING YEAR 2015 WITH PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR INTER-SECTION VOLUMES 1- f__ I / I . I W t. jTS1,s ` ter* R •r+_?.'�' r I ram', i1• • � "•'`►/� �'/�� ^� % r ♦ IN ItA or } � //�., / .. ... .\\ .`;'cam' ..+�• SITE `� A-'as 10. r .'0'e •� 1 Central Av.(SR-74)(NS) 2 Central Av.(SR-74)(NS) 3 Sunblase Rd.-Dwy.1 (NS) 4 Ardonwood Wy.(NS) S Ardenwood Wy.(EW) &Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) i Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) i Dwy.4(EW) f-131 L f-272 .� t � 7 .� �t� � � 403 f 24� cot 3-^ Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore,CA(JN-08850.06) cRosSROADS 52 EXHIBIT 6-6 OPENING YEAR 2015 WITH PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES r ' Y 14 lit. V uJ 4. Al SITE ;,:. - 1 Central Av.(SR-74)(NS) 2 Central Av.(SR-74)(NS) 3 Sunblo:e Rd.-Dory.1(NS) 4 Ardenwood Wy.(NS) t Ardenwood Wy.(EW) &Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) i Rosetta Cyn.Dr.(EW) i Dwy.2(EW) 0 �M ! 'a �16 win 75 -15925 Tt �413 ---- y I 79! 2—# o �� 152—► ��� 16� k� N Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:06) CRosSRonoS 53 Table 6-1 Intersection Analysis for Opening Year(2015)Conditions 2015 Without Project 2015 With Project Intersection Approach Lanes' Delay 2 Level of Delay 2 Level of Traffic Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound (secs.) Service (secs.) Service # Intersection Control' L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM 1 Central Av.(SR-74)/Ardenwood Wy. TS 1 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 19.8 17.7 B B 20.0 18.0 B B 2 Central Av.(SR-74)/Rosetta Cyn Dr- TS 0 3 d 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 22.6 17.1 C B 22.7 17.2 C B 3 Sunblaze Rd-/Rosetta Cyn. Dr.' CSS 0 11 0 0 1 d 1 2 0 1 2 0 23.2 9.2 C A 33.0 11.9 D B Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (major approach)5 1 2 0 1 2 0 9.5 76 A A 9.5 7.6 A A Sunblaze Rd.(minor approach)5 CSS 0 11 0 0 1 d - - - - - - 40.8 11 A E B 60.8 12.0 F B With Improvement AWS 0 11 0 0 1 d 1 2 0 1 2 0 18.6 8 3 C I A 19.5 8.3 C A 4 Ardenwood Wy-/Dwy.24 CSS 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 Intersection Does Not Exist 9.2 8.9 A A Ardenwood Wy. (major approach)5 0 1 0 0 1 0 - - - - - - Intersection Does Not Exist 7.5 74 A A Dwy.2(minor approach)5 CSS 0 1! 0 0 0 0 Intersection Does Not Exist 92 8.9 A A When a right turn is designated,the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes, L = Left, T = Through, R = Right;d=Defacto Right Turn Lane.1=Improvement(Project Access) Per the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual,overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with a traffic signal or all-way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control,see subsequent footnotes BOLD =LOS does not meet the applicable jurisdictional requirements(i.e,unacceptable LOS), BOLD =Cumulative Impact TS=Traffic Signal,CSS=Cross-Street Stop,AWS=All-Way Stop a LOS based on the average delay are shown. LOS based on the worst individual movement(or movements sharing a single lane)on a major or minor approach operating condition(unsignalized intersection)are shown. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624) Project T/A City of Lake Elsinore, CA (JN:08850) U URBAN C1Documents and Settmgs¢cacholalDesktop108850-04 Reportt6.t CR055ROAn5 54 As shown on Table 6-1, the addition of Project traffic is not anticipated to result in any additional deficient intersections in addition to the intersection identified for Opening Year (2015) Without Project traffic conditions. The intersection operations analysis worksheets for Opening Year (2015) With Project conditions are included in Appendix °6.2" of this TIA. 6.5 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS Traffic signal warrants for Opening Year (2015) Without Project conditions are based on Opening Year (2015) With Project peak hour intersection volumes. Traffic signal warrants for Opening Year (2015) With Project conditions are based on Opening Year (2015) With Project ADT volumes. For Opening Year (2015) Without and With Project conditions, there are no study area intersections that are anticipated to warrant a traffic signal (see Appendix "3.3"). 6.6 NEAR-TERM CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS Sunblaze Road— Driveway 9 /Rosetta Canyon Drive (#3) — Similar to E+P results, the southbound left turn movement at this intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable LOS (LOS 4`E"/"F") without or with the Project traffic under Opening Year (2015) traffic conditions. At the southbound approach to this intersection, turning movements are controlled by a cross-street stop. The Project does not contribute to a traffic volume increase for the southbound left turns. Although the southbound left turn vehicles are projected to experience delays during the morning peak hour (see Table 6-2), physical improvements (such as adding capacity for the southbound left turns) do not solve this problem. Because of the Earl Warren Elementary School location nearby, the morning traffic volumes on Rosetta Canyon Drive impede the southbound left turn movements. Installation of a traffic signal at this location is not recommended because traffic volumes do not warrant signal control at this location. However, installation of an all-way stop would result in an acceptable LOS. The all-way stop may not be advisable due to its proximity to the existing traffic signal at Central Avenue to the west and Ardenwood Way to the east. Therefore, subject to the approval of City Traffic Engineer, installation of an all-way stop control is a potential cumulative mitigation for this intersection. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis ��URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN 08850-03 Report) 55 CROSSROADS Table 6-2 Summary of LOS by Individual Turning Movements for Opening Year(2015) Conditions LOS By Turning Movement Overall Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Delay' Level of # Intersection L T R I_ T R L T R L T R (secs.) Service' 3 Sunblaze Rd./Rosetta Cyn. Dr. "AM Peak Hour Without Project E B A A A A 40.8 E -With Improvements 5 B B C C C 18.6 C PM Peak Hour Without Project B A A A A A 11.4 B -With Improvements A A A A A A 8.3 H AM Peak Hour With Project D D F B A A A A A A 60.8 F -With Improvements B B B B B B C C C C 19.5 PM Peak Hour With Project B B B A A A A A A A 12.0 B -With improvements B B B B B C C C C C 8.3 4 Ardenwood Wy./Dwy.2 "AM Peak Hour With Project A A A A A A 9.2 A PM Peak Hour With Project A A A A A A 8.9 A Per the 2000 highway Capacity Manual,overall average intersect on delay and level of service are shown for intersections with a traffic signal or all-way stop control For intersections with cross street stop control,the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement(or movements shanng a single lane)are shown. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624) Project TIA OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA (JN:08850) CROSSR"^0S CiDocuments and SetbngsVcacholalDesklop108850-04 Repon16-2 56 7.0 LOCAL CIRCULATION AND SITE ACCESS This section summarizes Project site access and on-site circulation recommendations. The Project is proposed to have access on Rosetta Canyon Drive via Driveway 1 and Ardenwood Way via Driveway 2. Both Project access points are proposed to be full-access. Regional access to the Project site will be provided by the 1-15 Freeway (located to the west) via Central Avenue (SR-74). Wherever necessary, roadways adjacent to the Project, site access points and site-adjacent intersections will be constructed to be consistent with or within the recommended roadway classifications and respective cross-sections in the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Circulation Element. SITE ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS The recommended site access driveway improvements for the Project are described below. Exhibit 7-1 illustrates the on-site recommended roadway lane improvements. Construction of on-site improvements shall occur in conjunction with adjacent Project development activity or as needed for Project access purposes. These improvements should be in place prior to occupancy. Sunblaze Road-Driveway 1 /Rosetta Canyon Drive (#3) — The following intersection improvements area recommended: • Subject to the approval of City Traffic Engineer, install an all-way stop control. • Construct Driveway 1 as 2-lane roadway with one northbound shared left-through-right turn lane and one southbound receiving lane. • Modify westbound striping on Rosetta Canyon Drive to provide a dedicated westbound left turn lane to serve the Project. Ardenwood Drive/Driveway 2 (#4) — The following intersection improvements area recommended: • Install a stop control on the eastbound approach • Construct Driveway 2 as a 2-lane roadway with one eastbound shared left-through-right turn lane and one westbound receiving lane. • The Project Driveway should be clear of any objects (such structures, trees, or equipments) that would interfere with sight distance. On-site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the Project site Sight distance at each project access point should be reviewed with respect to standard Caltrans and City of Lake Elsinore sight distance standards at the time of preparation of final grading, landscape and street improvement plans. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JU 08850-03 Report) 57 CROSSROADS EXHIBIT 7-1 ON-SITE CIRCULATION RECOMMENDATIONS r e �`� �l.r � 8 Sun6lo:e Rd.-Dwy.1 (NS) 1 6 Roseflo Cyn.Dr.(EW)Ir 1 f w> 1 SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF ' T ► =1, .e,.•w ,ls, ,I� CITY ENGINEER,INSTALL AN r r' ( f", ' Z• ; p ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ( 4 � ' • x j 1 ��,.'•• .`�" ; MODIFY THE WESTBOUND STRIPING ON ROSETTA CANYON DRIVE TO PROVIDE A DEDICATED WESTBOUND LEFT TURN LANE TO SERVE THE PO PROJECT. SITE e' � �l,,T• ��� - Tom•. • ��r . s ' 4 Ardenwood Wy.(NS) — iv. IlkDRIVEWAY 2 SHOULD BE CLEAR OF 8 Dwy.2(EW) ? ANY OBJECTS THAT WOULD r .- ♦ / ``. INTERFERE WITH SIGHT DISTANCE. ` ESIGHT DISTANCE AT EACH PROJECT ACCESS POINT SHOULD BE 1 �� REVIEWED WITH RESPECT TO STANDARD CALTRANS AND CITY OF / r LAKE ELSINORE SIGHT DISTANCE STANDARDS AT THE TIME OF • PREPARATION OF FINAL GRADING,LANDSCAPE AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS. 1— r ON-SITE TRAFFIC SIGNING AND STRIPING SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH DETAILED CONSTRUCTION Ile► PLANS FOR THE PROJECT SITE. LEGEND: `J =INSTALL ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL, DEF =DEFACTO RIGHT TURN LANE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER. 0 =INTERSECTION ID i =STOP SIGN - =EXISTING LANE L =LANE IMPROVEMENT Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAM City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:01) CRosSROAOS 58 8.0 LOCAL AND REGIONAL FUNDING MECHANISMS Transportation improvements throughout Riverside County are funded through a combination of direct project mitigation, fair share contributions or development impact fee programs. Identification and timing of needed improvements is generally determined through local jurisdictions based upon a variety of factors. Discussion of the relevant pre-existing transportation impact fee programs within the study area is provided below. 8.1 TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) PROGRAM The TUMF program is administered by Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) based upon a regional Nexus Study completed in early 2003 and updated in 2009 to address major changes in right of way acquisition and improvement cost factors. TUMF identifies a network of backbone and local roadways that are needed to accommodate growth through 2035, This regional program was put into place to ensure that development pays its fair share and that funding is in place for construction of facilities needed to maintain the requisite level of service and critical to mobility in the region. The project applicant will be subject to the TUMF fee program and will pay the requisite TUMF fees at the rates then in effect pursuant to the TUMF Ordinance. WRCOG has a successful track record funding and overseeing the construction of improvements funded through the TUMF program. In total, the TUMF program is anticipated to generate nearly $5 billion in transportation projects for Western Riverside County. The Project's payment of TUMF fees appear to be sufficient to mitigate its fair share of cumulative impacted TUMF-funded facilities. 8.2 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE (TIF) PROGRAM The City of Lake Elsinore has created its own local Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program to impose and collect fees from new residential, commercial and industrial development for the purpose of funding roadways and intersections necessary to accommodate City growth as identified in the City's General Plan Circulation Element. The City's TIF prograrn includes facilities that are not part of, or which may exceed improvements identified and covered by the TUMF program. As a result, the pairing of the regional and local fee programs provides a more comprehensive funding and implementation plan to ensure an adequate and interconnected transportation system. Under the City's TIF program. the City may grant to developers a credit against specific components of fees when those developers construct certain facilities and landscaped medians identified in the list of improvements funded by the TIF program. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN.08850-03 Report) 59 CROSSROADS The timing to use the TIF fees is established through periodic capital improvement programs which are overseen by the City's Public Works Department. Periodic traffic counts, review of traffic accidents, and a review of traffic trends throughout the City are also periodically performed by City staff and consultants. The City uses this data to determine the timing of implementing the improvements listed in its facilities list. The Project will be subject to the City's TIF fee program, and will pay the requisite City TIF fees at the rates then in effect pursuant to the City's ordinance. The payment of the requisite TIF fees will mitigate its impacts to TIF-funded facilities. The TIF network improvement needs were last updated in 2002 with an expected completion date by 2025. Improvements are identified in the Nexus Study by location rather than with specific geometrics. The Project's payment of fees appears reasonable to adequately mitigate the Project's cumulative impacts on TIF-funded facilities. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis �I URBAN City of Lake Elsinore,CA(JN:08850-03 Report) 60 CROSSROADS APPENDIX 1 .1 Approved Traffic Study Scoping Agreement Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN.08850-03 Report) CROSSROADS J& URBAM 41 Corporate Park I Sulte300 I Irvine,('A92606 (949)66D-1994 CROSSROADS www.urban roads.com Date: August 21, 2013 To: Rusty Beardsley, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE From: John Kain, URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. Subject: Scoping Agreement for the Proposed Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project The firm of Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to submit this scoping agreement for the proposed Trieste Residential TTM 36624 development ("Project'), which is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Central Avenue(SR-74) and Rosetta Canyon Drive in the City of Lake Elsinore. The Project is currently proposed to consist of 75 single family detached residential dwelling units. Our goal is to obtain comments from City of Lake Elsinore staff, to ensure that the traffic study fully addresses the potential impacts of the proposed Project. The remainder of this letter describes the draft proposed analysis methodology, project trip generation, trip distribution, and project traffic assignment/project trips on the surrounding roadway network, which have been used to establish the proposed project study area and analysis locations. Exhibit 1 depicts the location of the proposed Project in relation to the existing roadway network. The preliminary site plan for the proposed Project is shown on Exhibit 2. For purposes of the traffic analysis it is anticipated that the Project will be built and occupied by Year 2015 (i.e., opening year). As indicated on Exhibit 2, access to the Project site will be provided via Rosetta Canyon Drive and via Ardenwood Way. STUDY AREA The Riverside County traffic study guidelines and prior City of Lake Elsinore scoping agreements have been utilized for the purposes of developing this scoping document. The traffic impact study area was defined in conformance with the requirements of the Riverside County Traffic Impact Analysis guidelines, which state that the minimum area to be studied shall include any intersection of "Collector" or higher classification street, with "Collector" or higher classification streets, at which the proposed project will add 50 or more peak hour trips not to exceed a 5-mile radius from the project site. Exhibit 1 identifies the proposed study area intersections based on the aforernentioned criteria. 08850-02 Scope 1.1-1 Mr. Rusty Beardsley CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE August 21, 2013 Page 2 ANALYSIS SCENARIOS Consistent with traffic study guidelines adopted by multiple local jurisdictions throughout the County of Riverside, peak hour operations at each of the study area intersections and site access driveways will be assessed for the following analysis scenarios: 1) Existing (2013) Conditions (Baseline) 2) Existing plus Project Conditions 3) Opening Year (2015) Without Project Conditions 4) Opening Year(2015) With Project Conditions Analysis Scenario #1 establishes the baseline for CEQA purposes. Consistent with recent CEQA case law, Analysis Scenario #2 identifies significant traffic impacts associated with the proposed Project. Analysis Scenarios #3 and #4 would identify cumulative impacts for opening year traffic conditions. It is assumed that intersection improvements required to address opening year cumulative traffic impacts will be addressed through either an existing fee program, or through a fair-share contribution. Peak hour operations and level of service for study area intersections will be evaluated for the following time periods: • Weekday AM Peak Hour(7AM-9AM) • Weekday PM Peak Hour(4PM-6PM) TRIP GENERATION In order to develop the traffic characteristics of the proposed project, trip-generation statistics published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (91h Edition, 2012) manual for single family detached residential (ITE Land Use Code 210) is utilized. Table 1 presents the trip generation rates and trip generation total based on the number of dwelling units associated with the proposed Project. As shown on Table 1, the proposed development is anticipated to generate a net total of approximately 714 net trip-ends per day on a typical weekday with 56 net vehicles per hour(VPH) during the weekday AM peak hour, and 75 net VPH during the weekday PM peak hour. Scoping Agreement for Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project ��V RBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN:08850-02 Scope) caoss�AN 1.1-2 Mr. Rusty Beardsley CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE August 21, 2013 Page 3 TRIP DISTRIBUTION Exhibit 3 illustrates the proposed Project trip distribution patterns under opening year traffic conditions. Trip distribution is heavily influenced by the geographical location of the site, the location of commercial, employment and recreational opportunities and the proximity to the regional freeway system. The directional orientation of traffic was determined by evaluating existing and proposed land uses and highways within the study area. TRIP ASSIGNMENT Exhibit 4 illustrates the peak hour link volumes generated by the project. All intersections at which the project will add 50 or more peak hour trips are included in the proposed study area. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) CRITERIA The City of Lake Elsinore has established LOS "D" as the minimum level of service for its intersections. Therefore, any intersection operating at LOS "E" or "F" will be considered deficient for the purposes of this analysis. THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE— INTERSECTIONS To determine whether the addition of project traffic at a study intersection results in a significant project- related impact, the following thresholds of significance will be utilized: • A significant project-related impact occurs at a study intersection if the addition of project- generated trips reduces the peak hour level of service of the study intersection to change from acceptable level of service (LOS "A", "B", °C or "D") to an unacceptable level of service (LOS "E° or °F"); • A significant project-related impact occurs at a study intersection if the project-generated trips worsen the pre-project level of service grade at a deficiently operating (LOS "E" or "F") intersection by the following values: Thresholds of Significance Pre-Project LOS Project-Related Delay Increase Mitigation Measure E 2.0 Seconds or More Achieve Pre-project delay or better F 1.0 Second or More Achieve Pre-project delay or better Scoping Agreement for Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project "O►URBAN City of Lake Elsinore,CA(JN.08650-02 Scope) CROSSROADS 1.1-3 Mr. Rusty Beardsley CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE August 21, 2013 Page 4 The proposed significance thresholds will be applied at study area intersections for the purposes of determining project-related impacts. EXISTING COUNT DATA The count program will be scheduled as soon as the scoping agreement is approved by City technical staff. AMBIENT GROWTH Consistent with other studies performed in the area, an ambient growth rate of 2% per year is proposed for the study area intersections to approximate background traffic growth not identified by nearby cumulative development projects. The rate will be compounded over a two (2) year period (i.e., 1.022y"eafS = 1.0404 or 4.04%). CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS The attached Exhibit 5 and Table 2 display the cumulative projects in the surrounding area. However, only a portion of these projects will be built and occupied by 2015. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (949) 660-1994, extension 211, or Janette Cachola, extension 249. 08850-02 Scope Scoping Agreement for Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project ��V RBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN.08850-02 Scope) crzossr AN 1.1-4 EXHIBIT 1 TRAFFIC STUDY ANALYSIS LOCATIOS ` f t; Ir Ir or r f r i. ••1 xf. / :, Pam' ;• ... .. ... .. �t �' �' . ,�• . .. SITE Q r �`"• LEGEND: Q =EXISTING INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATION (1� =FUTURE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATION =FUTURE PROJECT DRIVEWAY Lake Elsinore TTM 36624 Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAR City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:01_p) CRosSRC)ADS 1.1-5 EXHIBIT 2 SITE PLAN 4� S I I� •® � li i _A'•"IrJ�'i ORDINW OO--------.- NAY-- _ � / �a.a..... - it Lake Elsinore TTM 36624 Traffic Impact Analysis URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:01_p) CROISSROADS O 1.1-6 TABLE 1 TRIESTE RESIDENTIAL (TTM 36624) PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY TRIP GENERATION RATES' Weekday ITE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use CODE Quantity2 In Out Total In Out Total Daily Single Family Detached 210 75 DU 0.19 0.5-0 1 0.75 0.63 0.37 1.00 9.52 TRIP GENERATION TOTAL Weekday ITE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use CODE Quantity2 In Out Total In Out Total Daily Single Family Detached 210 75 DU 14 42 56 47 28 75 714 TOTAL 14 42 56 47 28 75 714 Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE), Trip Generation Manual. 9th Edition(2012). DU= Dwelling Unit Scoping Agreement for Trieste Residential(TTM 36624) Project City of Lake Elsinore, CA (JN:08850) O URBAN CRO55ROAC15 UaUcJobs108 6 00-09 0001_08800108850Lcxcel108850-02 ScopelI 1.1-7 EXHIBIT 3 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION PATTERN ormun.s, 10, .. } ,"' ...'. SITE Ole Vv. oe `Y + o IQ ,� v i /001 LEGEND: 10-PERCENT TOAROM PROJECT Lake Elsinore TTM 36624 Traffic Impact Analysis /�-. City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN 08850:01_p) ,YRso 0 1.1-8 EXHIBIT 4 PROJECT ONLY PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES ,Y N J lop qr fty / �� v SITE N: r Y . Ott \ .. s 14 •'- - fir`` r �' .- �' � ' LEGEND: 100 =PROJECT ONLY AM PEAK HOUR LINK(2-WAY)VOLUMES (100) =PROJECT ONLY PM PEAK HOUR LINK(2-WAY)VOLUMES Lake Elsinore TTM 36624 Traffic Impact Analysis URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:01�) CROssROAO �s 1.1-9 EXHIBIT 5 CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MAP N s„ W� w oF�^ 4 s s a r� ♦is ♦ ♦i� =11111 legend >> Cumulaave Dewlolaneni a 2� 3 16 w Lake Elsinore TTM 36624 Traft Impact Analysis Coo/Lake ElsNim,CA(M.Oa&i0:CDI Ix 17.mxd) VRBA xnAN 1.1-10 TABLE 2 (Page 1 of 2) SUMMARY OF CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS No. Project Name Land Use Ouantit ' 1 Greenwald Shopping Center 104.450 TSF 2 Ramsgate Single Family Residential 1,012 DU Condo/Townhomes 120 DU Discount Superstore 151.397 TSF 3 Lake Elsinore Walmart Specialty Retail 5.3 TSF Fast-Food without Drive-Through 5.3 TSF Fast-Food with Drive-Through 6.8 TSF 4 Lennar(Tract 31792) Single Family Residential 191 DU 5 11400 Minthorn Street' Single Family Residential 84 DU Single Family Residential 523 DU 6 Spyglass Rancho CondolTownhomes 171 DU Shopping Center 145.00 TSF 7 South Shore I (Tract 31593 Single Family Residential _ 521 DU South Shore II Tract 32013 5 Single Family Residential 400 DU 8 ILa Strada(Tract 32077) Single Family Residential 134 DU 9 Tuscan West Tract 25473 5 Single Family Residential 164 DU 10 Marina Village Condos Tract 33820 6 CondolTownhomes 94 DU Single Family Residential 170 DU Condo/Townhomes 250 DU Apartments 110 DU Office 54.600 TSF 11 1Natersedge Hotel 150 RM Boat/Watercraft Dealers& Service 50.000 TSF Mini-Warehouse(Boat&Watercraft Storage 76.000 TSF Shopping Center 86.600 TSF Cottages by the Lake CondolTownhomes 169 DU 12 Tessera' Single Family Residential 90 DU 13 TAG Pro ert 6 New Car Sales 50.000 TSF 14 City Center Condos6 CondolTownhomes 144 DU 15 Lake View Villas Condo/Townhomes 155 DU CondolTownhomes 600 DU 16 Diamond Specific Plan' Hotel 150 RM General Office 425.000 TSF Shopping Center 472.000 TSF Scoping Agreement for Trieste Residential(TTM 36624) Project City of Lake Elsinore, CA (JN:08850) O URBAN CROSSII Ol�1�•. U.'IUcJobsl 08600-090001 088001088501Exce110 885 0-02 ScopeQ 1.1-11 TABLE 2 (Page 2 of 2) SUMMARY OF CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS No. Project Name Land Use Ouantit ' The Colons Apartments 211 DU Back Basin Specific Plan & East Lake Specific Single Family Residential 2,407 DU Plan Condo/Townhomes 324 DU 17 Single Family Residential 506 DU John Laing Homes (Phase 2) Condo/Townhomes 1,141 DU Apartments 308 DU Shopping Center 117.000 TSF Tract 29513 Single Family Residential 98 DU Tract 28658 Single Family Residential 141 DU 18 Plot Plan 18751 High Turnover Sit-Down Restaurant 6.959 TSF Tract 31345; KB Homes;Tract 32785, Plot Plan Single Family Residential 121 DU 1873 Apartments 96 DU 19 Plot Plan 20240 Shopping Center 250.000 TSF Canyon Hills Estates(Tract 34249) Single Family Residential 302 DU Canyon Hills(Multiple Tracts) Single Family Residential 2,700 DU 20 Apartments 1.575 DU Audie Murphy(Tract 36484) Single Family Residential 109 DU Audie Murphy Tract 36485 Single Family Residential 1 11003 DU ' TSF=Thousand Square Feet;DU=Dwelling Unit,AC=Acres;STU=Students;VFP=Vehicle Fueling Positions z Source:Greenwald Avenue Commercial Center TIA,Urban Crossroads,Inc.,May 2008- 3 Source:1400 Minthorn Street Traffic Study Report,ASM Consulting,August 2007. ° Source:Spyglass Ranch TIA(Revised),Kunzman Associates,February 2007. 5 Source:Porto Romano SP TIA(Revised),Urban Crossroads,Inc.,May 2007. a Source:Lake Elsinore TAG Property TIA(Revised),Urban Crossroads, Inc.,August 2008. Source:The Diamond Specific Plan TIA,Urban Crossroads, Inc-,April 2009. Scoppng Agreement for Trieste Residential(TTM 36624) Project City of Lake Elsinore, CA (JN:08850) O URBAN CROISSraaAr, U:IUcJobsi_08600-090001_088001088501ExcehO8650-02 Scopel2 1.1-12 Janette Cachola From: Rusty Beardsley [reardsley@Lake-Elsinore.org] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 4:31 PM To: Janette Cachola Cc: CMS Administrator; John Kain; Marlie Whiteman; MarkRosene@mbk.com Subject: RE: JN:08850- Scoping Agreement for the Proposed Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project Attachments: image001.jpg; Trieste Dist Redline.pdf Janette, I have attached my thoughts on what would be a more realistic distribution of trips based on the project layout. Please call me if you want to discuss. Rusty Beardsley Traffic Engineer City of Lake Elsinore 951.674.3124 x 240 From: Janette Cachola [JCachola@urbanxroads.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 4:36 PM To: Rusty Beardsley Cc : CMS Administrator; John Kain; Marlie Whiteman; MarkRosenepmbk.coni Subject: JN:08850- Scoping Agreement for the Proposed Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project Rusty, I have attached the proposed scoping agreement for TMM 36624. We would appreciate your response within the next week, if possible. Don't hesitate to give us a call if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Janette Cachola Analyst [cid:imaRe001.1pggOICE9E8C.3C457000] IRVINE I CARLSBAD I RIVERSIDE 41 Corporate Park, Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92606 ph: (949) 660-1994 x249 www.urbanxroads.com<http://www.urbanxroads.com/> 1 1.1-13 i EXHIBIT 3 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION PATTERN . 1 �� , �•C, �... q A ! Y.✓�y �.y .`. R F �M � '„•t k1.q .7 _y, HII r 4 4 -s s y t x+ oey 'cE ```` C �� ��Rv v �i X- 4 SITE 5 7. 7 >y + tir E , l �x:• rr LEGEND: 10=PERCENT TO/FROM PROJECT Lake Elsinore TTM 36624 Traffic Impact Analysis URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN-08850:01_p) CRUSSRCJAUS 8 - 1• w:1.4 APPENDIX 3.1 Traffic Count Data — September 2013 Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis ��URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN:08850-03 Report) CRC/SSROA�S Counts Unlimited Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona,CA 92878 (951)268-6268 City of Lake Elsinore File Name : LKECEARAM N/S: Central Avenue(SR-74) Site Code : 00001111 E/W:Ardenwood Way Start Date :9/10/2013 Weather: Sunny Page No 1 Groups Printed-Total Volume Central Avenue(SR-74) Ardenwood Way Central Avenue(SR-74) _._... Southbound Westbound _Northbound _ Start Time Leff Thru 1_ App.Total Left1__ Right App,Total . _Thru1 Right I App.Total r Int.Total_ 07:00 AM 4 361 365 30 7 37 i 284 16 300 702 07.15 AM 2 403 405 22 4 26 266 14 280 711 07:30 AM 2 341 343 28 4 32 320 14 334 709 07:45 AM 3 305 _ 308 _1.2 3 15_ . _ 241__ 16 257,.,,. 580 Total 11 1410 1421 92 18 110 1111 60 1171 2702 08:00 AM 0 287 287 14 3 17 157 7 164 468 08:15 AM 0 301 301 11 1 12 I 156 6 162 475 Total 0 1025 1025 1 7 16 1 129 6 138 383 08:45 AM __ 0 219 _ 219 14— 2 16 t_29 9 I38 373 08:30 AM ! 0 218 218 11 1 1 589 28 617 ; 1699 Grand Total 11 2435 2446 142 25 167 1700 88 1789 I 4401 Apprch% 0.4 99.6 85 15 95.1 4.9 Total% 5.6 0.2 55.3 5 3.2 0.6 3.8 38.6 2 40.6 Central Avenue(SR-74) Ardenwood Way Central Avenue(SR-74) Southbound _— I Westbound Northbound _. _. Start Time . . Left Thru I App.Total i Left( _ Ri t.-A-pP-Total Thru Right 1 App Total Int,,Total f Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM-Peak 1 of Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Bcgins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 4 361 365 ! 30 7 37 284 16 300 11 702 07:15 AM 2 403 405 22 4 26 266 14 280 1 711 07:30 AM 2 341 343 28 4 32 320 14 334 709 07:45 AM_ 3 305 308 12 _ 3- 15 241 ___ 16 257 580 Total Volume 11 1410 1421 92 18 110 HII 60 1 17 1 2702 %App.TotalJ 6.8 99.2 83.6 -- 16- _ 94.9 5.1 PHF .688 875 .877 .767 .643 .743 _ .868__ .938 .876 .950_ 3.1-1 Counts Unlimited Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona,CA 92878 (951)268-6268 City of Lake Elsinore File Name :LKECEARAM N/S:Central Avenue(SR-74) Site Code :00001111 ENV:Ardenwood Way Start Date :9/10/2013 Weather:Sunny Page No :2 Central Avenue(SR-74) Out In Total 1129 1421 2550' 14101 11 Thru Left I � 1 Peak Hour Data h Peak-ioc,Begins a:07 00.AM m Tutal Volirie n r„ Thru Right 11'1 60 1502 117' 2673 1 Out In Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM-Peak 1 of 1 Peak 1 tour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:00 AM j 07:00 AM 07:00 AM +0 mills. 4 361 365 30 7 37 284 16 300 +15 mins. 2 403 405 22 4 26 266 14 280 +30 mins. 2 341 343 28 4 32 320 14 334 +45 mins. 3 305 308 12 3 15 241 16 257 Total Volume 11 1410 1421 92 18 110 IIH 60 1171 %App.Total 0.8 99.2 83.6_ 16.4 94.9 5.1 PliF I .688 875 .877 i 767 __ _ .643 .743 .868 .938 .876 3.1-2 Counts Unlimited Inc. PO Box1178 Corona,CA 92878 (951)268-6268 City of Lake Elsinore File Name : LKECEARPM N/S Central Avenue(SR-74) Site Code :00001111 E/W:Ardenwood Way Start Date :9/10/2013 Weather:Sunny Page No 1 roupsPrimed-Total Volume Central Avenue(SR-74) Ardenwood Way Central Avenue(SR-74) Southhuund Westbound __ Northbound Stan Time Left 1 _._Thru�_...App.Total Left Righl�App,Total Thru_ Right App.Total Int.Total 04:00 PM 1 237 238 10 1 11 373 26 399 648 04:15 PM 4 243 247 13 1 14 285 18 303 564 04:30 PM 3 236 239 8 2 10 ; 352 20 372 621 04:45 PM 4... 266 270 ; 7 1.._ _8_ 364 18 382 660 Total 12 982 994 38 5 43 1 1374 82 1456 2493 05:00 PM ! 1 241 242 15 4 19 398 17 415 676 05:15 PM 4 246 250 15 5 20 388 29 417 687 05:30 PM 3 249 252 13 1 14 375 32 407 673 05:45_PM 4 243 247.1 12 4 _ _16_1-__ 321 26 3471 610 Total 12 979 991 i 55 14 69 ; 1482 104 1586 1 2646 Grand Total 24 1961 1985 93 19 112 2856 186 3042 5139 Apprch% 1.2 98.8 83 17 93.9 6.1 Total% 0.5 38.2 31 1.8 0.4 2.2 I 55.6 3.6 59.2 i Central Avenue(SR-74) Ardenwood Way Central Avenue(SR-74) Southbound Westbound Northbound Start] 'ime Left! Thru App.Total Left] Right j App.Total Thru ; Right . App.Total ] Int.Total- Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM-Peak I of I Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 4 266 270 7 1 8 364 18 382 660 05:00 PM 1 241 242 15 4 19 398 17 415 676 05:15 PM 4 246 250 15 5 20 388 29 417 687 05:30 PM_ _ 3 249 252__ 13 1 14 375_ 32__ - _ -_ _407_ 673 Total Volume 12 1002 1014 50 11 61 1525 96 1621 2696 %App.Tote) _ 11 98.8 82 18 94.1 5.9 PHF 750 .942 _ .939 .833 .550 .763 .958 750 .972 .981 3.1-3 Counts Unlimited Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona,CA 92878 (951)268-6268 City of Lake Elsinore File Name : LKECEARPM N/S: Central Avenue(SR-74) Site Code :00001111 E/W:Ardenwood Way Start Date : 9/10/2013 Weather: Sunny Page No 2 Central Avenue(SR-74) Out In Total 1536 1014 2550 10021 12 TI Lin Peak Hour Data North D Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM � � I �IS 0 Total Volume q 0 and s_ i Thru Right 1525 96 1052 1621 2673 Out In Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM-Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each A roach8 Be ins at: Pp, - 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 04:45 PM +0 mins. ' 4 266 270 15 4 19 4 364 18 382 +IS mins. 1 241 242 15 5 20 f 398 17 415 +30 mins. 4 246 250 13 1 14 388 29 417 +45mins. 3 249 252 12 4 16 375 _32 407. Total Volume 12 1002 1014 j 55 14 69 1525 96 1621 %App.Total 1,2__ 98.8 79.7 20.3 __ 94.1 5:9_ PHF 750 - .942 939_} .917 700 .863 .958 750 _972 3.1-4 Counts Unlimited Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona,CA 92878 (951)268-6268 City of Lake Elsinore File Name : LKECEROAM N/S. Central Avenue(SR-74) Site Code 00001111 E/W: Rosetta Canyon Drive Start Date 9/10/2013 Weather:Sunny Page No 1 Groups Printed-Total Volume — ! Drive Central Avenue(SR-74) 1y _Northbound __—... ___.__Start Time t eft aSo t Tlhru App.Total Left Rosetta Right Westbound App.Total ' ThM _Right App.Total -Int.Total 07:00 AM 7 325 332 68 5 73 213 18 231 636 07:15 AM 11 324 335 61 9 70 209 57 266 671 07:30 AM 57 271 328 67 17 84 220 105 325 737 07:45 AM 75 202 __277_ 108 65 173 189_—____72 _—.261 _ 711_ Total 150 1122 1272 304 96 400 831 252 1083 2755 08:00 AM 11 201 212 78 39 117 147 15 162 491 08:15 AM 2 205 207 36 6 42 144 15 159 418 08:30 AM 4 202 206 26 3 29 143 12 155 390 08:45 AM — 4 _ 197 201_ 27 4 31 { 123 9 132 364 Total 21 805 826 167 52 219 1 557 51 608 1653 Grand Total 171 1927 2098 471 148 619 1388 303 1691 4408 Apprch% 8.2 91.9 76.1 23.9 82.1 17.9 1 Total% 3.9 43.7 C 10.7 3A 14 I 31.5 6.9 38.4 Central Avenue(SR-74) Rosetta Canyon Drive Central Avenue(SR-74) Southbound 11 Westbound _—_ Northbound Start Time Left — ThruI App.Total , Lefl[_ Right App.Total_ Thru f Right App.Total lni.Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM-Peak I of I Peak Flour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 7 325 332 68 5 73 213 18 23 6636 07:15 AM 11 324 335 61 9 70 209 57 266 671 07:30 AM 57 271 328 67 17 84 220 105 325 737 07:45 AM 75 _202 277 108 _- _65 -__173- 189 72 261 711 Total Volume 150 1122 1272 304 96 400 831 252 1083 2755 %App.Total 11.8 88.2 76 24_ __ - 76.7 23.3 PHF 1 .500 .863 949_I .704 .369 .578 , 944 .600 .8.3.3 i __-_935 3.1-5 Counts Unlimited Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona,CA 92878 (951)268-6268 City of Lake Elsinore File Name : LKECEROAM N/S: Central Avenue(SR-74) Site Code :00001111 E/W: Rosetta Canyon Drive Start Date :9/10/2013 Weather: Sunny Page No :2 Central Avenue(SR-74) put- In Total I [—927J 1 1?72 2199 1122 150 Thru Left Peak Hour Data AL j��O 0 f n Peak Hour Begins at 07,00 AM 'o> r W, o Total Volume om �Im Thru Right (_ 831 252 1426 1083 2509 Out In Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM-Peak 1 of 1 Peak_Hour for Each Approach Begins at; 07:00 AM 07:15 AM 07:00 AM +0 mins. 7 325 332 61 9 70 213 18 231 +15 mins. 11 324 335 67 17 84 209 57 266 +30 mins. 57 271 328 108 65 173 220 105 325 +45 mins. 75- 202 277 78_ 39 117 - 189_- 72 261 Total Volume 150 1122 1272 314 130 444 831 252 1083 %o App.Total 11.8 88.2 j 70.7_ __ _29.3_ 76,7 23.3 PHF .500 .863 .949 .727_ _.500 .642 .944 600__._. 833_ 3.1-6 Counts Unlimited Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona,CA 92878 (951)268-6268 City of Lake Elsinore File Name : LKECEROPM N/S: Central Avenue(SR-74) Site Code :00001111 E/W: Rosetta Canyon Drive Start Date :9/10/2013 Weather: Sunny Page No 1 Groups_Printed-Total Volume Central Avenue(SR-74) Rosetta Canyon Drive Central Avenue(SR-74) S_outhbound Westbound ___ Northbound._ -Total Start Time Lett _Thru I App.Total Leff: Right.L App_Total Thru Right L_App.'fotal Int. 07:00 AM 8 208 216 21 5 26 346 38 384 626 07:15 AM 5 218 223 ; 26 1 27 257 28 285 i 535 07:30 AM 2 232 234 i 15 1 16 324 35 359 ' 609 07:45 AM 7 220_ 227 _ 24 3- -_ __ 27 330 39 _ 369 _623_ Total 22 878 900 86 10 96 1 1257 140 1397 I 2393 08:00 AM 2 206 208 1 36 5 41 363 35 398 647 08:15 AM 8 226 234 29 3 32 374 27 401 667 08:30 AM 2 216 218 28 5 33 325 43 368 619 08:45 AM 8 232 24.0 25 3 28- __ 280 40 _320 588 Total 20 880 900 118 16 134 1342 145 1487 2521 Grand Total 42 1758 1800 ( 204 26 230 2599 285 2884 4914 Apprch% 2.3 97.7 88.7 11.3 j 90.1 9.9 j Total% 0.9 35.8 36.6 4.2 0.5 4.7 1 52.9 5.8 59.7 •': Central Avenue(SR-74) Rosetta Canyon Drive Central Avenue(SR-74) Sorthbound __ Westbound tI _ __ Northbound �.._ _Start Time Leftj Thru I App.Total Left ___ Right I App.Total_I___Thru Right App,Total . 1nt.Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM-Peak 1 of I Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM 07:45 AM ; 7 220 227 24 3 27 330 39 369 623 08:00 AM 2 206 208 36 5 41 363 35 398 647 08:15 AM 8 226 234 29 3 32 374 27 401 667 08:30AM 2 216 _ 218_ -- 28 __- 5_- 33 325 43 368 I _ 619 Total Volume 19 868 887 117 16 133 1392 144 1536 2556 APP--Total PHF .594.1 97.9 - —- - _ 88 1 - -- 90-.6- - 9.4- .960 _ .948_ .813 800_ .811 .930 .837 .958 i ,958_ 3.1-7 Counts Unlimited Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona,CA 92878 (951)268-6268 City of Lake Elsinore File Name :LKECEROPM N/S:Central Avenue(SR-74) Site Code :00001111 E/W:Rosetta Canyon Drive Start Date :9/10/2013 Weather:Sunny Page No :2 Central Avenue(SR-74) Out In Total 1408', 887' I 2295'. 868 19 Thru Left Peak Hour Data �0 F O Noi1h Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM 3 r w o Total Volume . o rn— Thru Right 1392 144 985 1536 2521 Out In Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM-Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:30 AM 08:00 AM 07:45 AM +0 mins. 2 232 234 36 5 41 330 39 369 +IS mins. 7 220 227 29 3 32 I 363 35 398 +30 mins. 2 206 208 28 5 33 374 27 401 +45 mins. 8 226 234 25 3 28 ; 325 43 368_ Total Volume 19 884 903 118 16 134 1392 144 1536 %App.Total 2-1 97.9 88.1 11.9 90.6 9.4 PHF .594 .953 .965 .819 .800 .817 .930 .837 .958 3.1-8 Counts Unlimited Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona,CA 92878 (951)268-6268 City of Lake Elsinore File Name : LKESUROAM N/S: Sunblaze Drive Site Code :00001111 E/W: Rosetta Canyon Drive Start Date :9/10/2013 Weather: Sunny Page No 1 Gros Printed-Total Volume Southbound Westbound hZ App_Total Left Rosetta Canyon Drive Sunblaze Drive Rosetta Canyon Drive Ros Eastbound Start'Time Left Right. App.Total. Thru , Thru App."1 oral _ Int. otal_ " 07:00 AM 2 29 31 43 4 47 8 20 28 106 07:15 AM 6 28 34 47 1 48 7 62 69 151 07:30 AM 23 20 43 62 8 70 15 140 155 268 07:45_AM_ 1 19 10 29 166 27 193 8 143 151_ 373_ Total '! 50 87 137 318 40 358 38 365 403 899 08:00 AM 2 15 17 99 12 111 4 22 26 154 08:15 AM 1 14 15 27 13 40 5 12 17 72 08:30 AM 2 11 13 18 8 26 5 12 17 56 -- - ---14 -- 46_ _08:4 AM 2 12 14 19 1 20Total 7 52 59 163 34 197 " 16 56 72 328 Grand Total 57 139 196 491 74 555 54 421 475 1226 Apprch% 29.1 70.9 86.7 13.3 11.4 88.6 Total% 4.6 11.3 16 I 39.2 6 45.3 4.4 34.3 38.7 Sunblaze Drive Rosetta Canyon Drive l Rosetta Canyon Drive Southbound Westbound I Eastbound _ Start Time _ Le�_ Right j App.Total Thru Right App.Total 1 Leftj Thru I App.Total Int.Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM-Peak I of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 6 28 34 47 1 48 7 62 69 151 07:30 AM 23 20 43 62 8 70 15 140 155 268 07:45 AM 19 10 29 166 27 193 8 143 151 373 _ __08:00_AM I_ 2 15 ___17 99 12 111 -__ 4 22 26 154 Total Volume 1II 50 73 123 374 48 422 34 367 401 I 946 046 A Total 40.7 59.3 88.6 11.4 8.5 91.5 ll PHF .543 .652 .715 .563 ___ .444 .547 .567 .642 .647.1 .634 3.1-9 Counts Unlimited Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona,CA 92878 (951)268-6268 City of Lake Elsinore File Name : LKESUROAM N/S Sunblaze Drive Site Code : 00001111 E/W: Rosetta Canyon Drive Start Date :9/10/2013 Weather: Sunny Page No 2 Sunblaze Drive Out In Total 82 123 205 73 50 Right _eft Peak Hour Data co i H UOM R O o North ;o c N A Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM U (02 Total Volume 2 o N 1, U °m wm cD— Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM-Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each_Approach Begins at: '07:00 AM 07:15 AM 07:06 AM +0 mins. 2 29 31 47 1 48 8 20 28 +15 mins. 6 28 34 62 8 70 7 62 69 +30 mins. 23 20 43 166 27 193 15 140 155 +45 mins. 19 10 29 99 12 11_I _- 8 143 15.1_ Total Volume 50 87 137 374 48 422 38 365 403 %App.Total 36.5 63.5 88.6 11.4 _ __9_4___- _90.6 PHF .543 .750 .797 _.563 .444 .547_ _... ..633 .638 ,650_j 3.1-10 Counts Unlimited Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona,CA 92878 (951)268-6268 City of Lake Elsinore File Name : LKESUROPM N/S Sunblaze Drive Site Code :00001111 E/W: Rosetta Canyon Drive Start Date 9/10/2013 Weather: Sunny Page No 1 Groups Printed-Total Volume_..___ Sunblaze Drive Rosetta Canyon Drive Rosetta Canyon Drive Southbound _ - Westbound _. _Eastbound_ _Start Time_ Left I Righ _ t-�App Total Thru l __-.-Right-.! App.Total Left 1_ _ Thru].App,Total. Int.Total] 04:00 PM 3 15 18 13 2 15 18 29 4 80 04:15 PM 1 11 12 I5 2 17 13 15 28 57 04:30 PM 2 8 10 8 1 9 ; 20 23 43 62 _04:45_PM- 2 13 15 14 1 15 15 25 _ -40 70 Total 8 47 55 , 50 6 56 ] 66 92 158 . 269 05:00 PM 2 15 17 24 1 25 16 27 43 85 05:15 PM 3 I5 18 , 17 7 24 8 20 28 70 05:30 PM 1 13 14 ' 19 5 24 21 25 46 84 05:45 PM_ 3 12 15_I l8 _ 2 20 20. 26 _ 46_ 81 Total 9 55 64 78 15 93 69 98 163 320 Grand Total 17 102 119 128 21 149 131 190 321 I 599 Apprch% 14.3 85.7 85.9 14.1 40.8 59.2 Total% 2.9 17.3 20.2 21.7 3.6 25.3 22.2 32.3 54.5 - - - -- Sunblaze Drive Rosetta Canyon Drive Rosetta Canyon Drive Stan Time Left SoutRbout App.Total Westboundght 1 Ann Total Eastbound Y gh _Thru Ri _ j Left] Thru ] App.Total Int.Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM-Peak 1 of Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 2 15 17 24 1 25 16 27 43 85 05:15 PM 3 15 18 17 7 24 8 20 28 70 05:30 PM 1 13 14 19 5 24 21 25 46 84 05:45 PM_ 3 12 _15 18 2_ 20 20 26 __-46- 81 Total Volume 9 55 64 78 15 93 65 98 163 320 %App.Total 14.1 _ - 85.9 -_- 83.9 16.I__ _ 39.9 60.1 PHF 1 .750 .9.1.7 - 1889 .81.3 .536 .930 _ 774 .907 .886 .941 3.1-11 Counts Unlimited Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona,CA 92878 (951)268-6268 City of Lake Elsinore File Name :LKESUROPM N/S:Sunblaze Drive Site Code :00001111 ENV:Rosetta Canyon Drive Start Date :9/10/2013 Weather:Sunny Page No :2 Sunblaze Drive Out In Totai 60 64 144 55 9 Right Left Peak Hour Data N j I O C O OC vy, Nalh ,w 3 C p N 0, —^ 2 Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM w o J ' Total Volume_ _ o O 7 M O< a O� 061 (D O— Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM-Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 1-0 mins. 2 13 15 l 24 1 25 16 27 43 +15 mins. 2 Is 17 17 7 24 8 20 28 +30 mins. 3 15 18 19 5 24 21 25 46 +45 mins. 1 13 14 I8 2 20__ 20 26 46 Total Volume 8 56 64 78 IS 93 65 98 163 %App,Total 12.5 875 83.9 1&1 39.9 60,11 PIIf' 1 .667 .933 $$9 813 .536 .930 .774 .907 .886 3.1-12 APPENDIX 3.2 Existing (2013) Conditions Intersection Operations Analysis Worksheets Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis URBAN City of Lake Elsinore,CA(JN. 06850-03 Report) CROSSROADS EXAM Wed Oct 2, 2013 22:03:57 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Existing (2013) Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Central Av. (SR-74) (NS) / Ardenwood Wy. (EW) ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec) : 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.471 Loss Time (sec) : 12 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 18.9 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 32 32 10 32 32 10 10 10 10 33 33 y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1111 60 11 1415 0 0 0 0 92 0 18 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1111 60 11 1415 0 0 0 0 92 0 18 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 1169 63 12 1489 0 0 0 0 97 0 19 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1169 63 12 1489 0 0 0 0 97 0 19 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1169 63 12 1489 0 0 0 0 97 0 19 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 2.85 0.15 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 1900 4882 264 1805 3610 0 0 1900 0 1805 0 1615 ------------I---------------II---------------il---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.01 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.01 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.15 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.28 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.04 Delay/Veh: 0.0 21.8 21.8 43.8 15.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.5 0.0 32.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 21.8 21.8 43.8 15.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.5 0.0 32.0 LOS by Move: A C C D B A A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 11 11 0 18 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 3.2-1 EXAM Wed Oct 2, 2013 22:03:57 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Existing (2013) Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Central Av. (SR-74) (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec) : 90 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.519 Loss Time (sec) : 12 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 21.7 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------i Control: Permitted Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 32 32 10 10 0 0 0 0 33 0 33 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 877 252 150 1122 0 0 0 0 304 0 143 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 877 252 150 1122 0 0 0 0 304 0 143 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 938 270 160 1200 0 0 0 0 325 0 153 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 938 270 160 1200 0 0 0 0 325 0 153 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 938 270 160 1200 0 0 0 0 325 0 153 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 0 5187 1615 1805 3610 0 0 0 0 1805 0 1615 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.18 0.17 0.09 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.14 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.37 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.51 0.47 0.62 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.26 Delay/Veh: 0.0 23.0 23.0 40.5 17.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.6 0.0 20.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 23.0 23.0 40.5 17.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.6 0.0 20.2 LOS by Move: A C C D B A A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 7 6 5 14 0 0 0 0 7 0 3 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 3.2-2 MITIG8 - EXAM Thu Oct 3, 2013 20:30:11 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Existing (2013) Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Sunblaze Rd. (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 2.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 18.81 ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 50 0 73 34 368 0 0 374 48 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 50 0 73 34 368 0 0 374 48 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 79 0 115 54 580 0 0 590 76 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 79 0 115 54 580 0 0 590 76 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------II---------------11---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1025 xxxx 333 666 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 234 xxxx 669 933 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 224 xxxx 669 933 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.35 xxxx 0.17 0.06 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.5 xxxx 0.6 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 29.6 xxxx 11.5 9.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * D * B A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx 18.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * C Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 3.2-3 EXPM Wed Oct 2, 2013 22:04:15 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Central Av. (SR-74) (NS) / Ardenwood Wy. (EW) ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec) : 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.372 Loss Time (sec) : 12 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 16.8 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 32 32 10 32 32 10 10 10 10 33 33 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1525 96 12 1002 0 0 0 0 50 0 11 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1525 96 12 1002 0 0 0 0 50 0 11 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 PHF Volume: 0 1555 98 12 1021 0 0 0 0 51 0 11 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1555 98 12 1021 0 0 0 0 51 0 11 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1555 98 12 1021 0 0 0 0 51 0 11 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 2.82 0.18 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1900 4836 304 1805 3610 0 0 1900 0 1805 0 1615 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.01 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.01 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.08 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.28 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.59 0.59 0.08 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.03 Delay/Veh: 0.0 18.9 18.9 51.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.5 0.0 31.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 18.9 18.9 51.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.5 0.0 31.8 LOS by Move: A B B D B A A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 15 15 0 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 3.2-4 EXPM Wed Oct 2, 2013 22:04:15 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) +++++++++++++++++++++++++*+++++++++++++++++++++*+*+*+*++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Intersection #2 Central Av. (SR-74) (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) Cycle (sec) : 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.399 Loss Time (sec) : 12 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 16.4 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B ++++*++++++++++*++++++*++++++++++**+++++++++++++++*++++++*++++++++++++++++++++++ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------1---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 32 32 10 10 0 0 0 0 33 0 33 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1392 144 19 897 0 0 0 0 117 0 16 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1392 144 19 897 0 0 0 0 117 0 16 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 0 1453 150 20 936 0 0 0 0 122 0 17 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1453 150 20 936 0 0 0 0 122 0 17 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1453 150 20 936 0 0 0 0 122 0 17 ------------I---------------II---------------Il---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 0 5187 1615 1605 3610 0 0 0 0 1805 0 1615 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.28 0.09 0.01 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.01 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.08 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.28 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.52 0.17 0.13 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.04 Delay/Veh: 0.0 17.7 14.0 51.4 11.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.1 0.0 31.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 17.7 14.0 51.4 11.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.1 0.0 31.9 LOS by Move: A B B D B A A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 12 3 1 9 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 +++++++++++++++++*+++*+++++++*+++++++**++*+**+++++++++++++++++++++++*+++++++++++ Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ++++++++++++*++++++++++++++*++++++++*++**+++++++++++++++++++++++++**++++++++++*+ Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 3.2-5 MITIG8 - EXPM Thu Oct 3, 2013 20:30:26 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Sunblaze Rd. (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 3.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.0) Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------if---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 9 0 55 65 98 0 0 78 15 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 9 0 55 65 98 0 0 78 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 10 0 58 69 104 0 0 83 16 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 10 0 58 69 104 0 0 83 16 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 281 xxxx 49 99 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 691 xxxx 1015 1507 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 667 xxxx 1015 1507 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx 0.06 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx 0.2 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10.5 xxxx 8.8 7.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * B * A A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx 9.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 3.2-6 APPENDIX 3.3 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Worksheets Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBANCity of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN.08850-03 Report) Existing (2013) Conditions 3.3-1 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1 3-2 California MUTCD 2012 Edition (FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour Traffic Conditions = Existing (2013) Conditions -Weekday AM Peak Hour Major Street Narne = Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 824 Number of Approach Lanes on Major Street= 2 Minor Street Name= Sunblaze Rd. (INS) High Volume Approach (VPH) = 123 Number of Approach Lanes On Minor Street = 1 SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED 700IL - - x > 600 t v m 0 500 Q Q Q N 400 E 0 300 O L 200 - a� O 123 O N 100 O v cv 0 - H_ 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Major Street -Total of Both Approaches (VPH) —0 —1 Lane(Major)&1 Lane(Minor) �—2+Lanes(Major)&1 Lane(Minor)OR 1 Lane(Major)&2+Lanes(Minor) —0—2+Lanes(Major)&2+Lanes(Minor) --m--Major Street Approaches —AK—-Minor Street Approaches `Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with one lane Trieste Residential(TTM 36624) Project TIA OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA (JN:08850) CROSSROADS U:IUcJobsl_08600-090001_088001088501Signal Warran1s101_Existing103_A0Ftg 4C.3 eUrban Peak) 3.3-3 California MUTCD 2012 Edition (FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour Traffic Conditions = Existing (2013) Conditions -Weekday PM Peak Hour Major Street Name = Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 256 Number of Approach Lanes on Major Street = 2 Minor Street Name= Sunblaze Rd. (INS) High Volume Approach (VPH) = 64 Number of Approach Lanes On Minor Street= 1 SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED 700 — a > 600 t U f6 500 - c. a a a) 400 - E 0 300 m L 2) 200 — N d N 100 - O C_ 0 - - 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Major Street -Total of Both Approaches (VPH) --C)--1 Lane(Major)&1 Lane(Minor) 6 2+Lanes(Major)&1 Lane(Minor)OR 1 Lane(Major)&2+Lanes(Minor) �—2+Lanes(Major)&2+Lanes(Minor) —�—Major Street Approaches —-4K—-Minor Street Approaches `Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with one lane Trieste Residential(TTM 36624) Project TIA OURBAra City of Lake Elsinore, CA (JN:08850) CRossRoeans U.WcJobsl_08600-090001_08800108850tSgnal Warran1s101_Ekisting103_PMFig 4C-3(Urban Peak) 3.3-4 Existing plus Project Conditions 3.3-5 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 3.3-6 California MUTCD (FHWA's MUTCD 2012, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-103 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Average Traffic Estimate Form) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS E+P DIST CO RTE PM CALC JC DATE 10/02/13 Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore CHK DATE Major Street: Rosetta Canyon Drive (EW) Critical Approach Speed (Major) 40 mph Minor Street:-Su n blaze Road (NS) Critical Approach Speed (Minor) 35 mph Major Street Approach Lanes = 2 lane Minor Street Approach Lane: 1 lane Major Street Future ADT= 3,100 vpd Minor Street Future ADT= 864 vpd Speed limit or critical speed on major street traffic>64 km/h (40 mph); .......... or RURAL(R) In built up area of isolated community of< 10,000 population ........................ (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note) URBAN RURAL Minimum Requirements XX EADT CONDITION A - Minimum Vehicular Volume Vehicles Per Day Satisfied Not Satisfied Vehicles Per Day on on Higher-Volume XX Major Street Minor Street Approach Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach (Total of Both Approaches) (One Direction Only) Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural 1 1 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680 2 + 3,100 1 864 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680 2 + 2 + 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 1 2 + 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 CONDITION B -Interruption of Continuous Traffic Vehicles Per Day Satisfied Not Satisfied Vehicles Per Day on Higher-Volume XX on Major Street Minor Street Approach Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach (Total of Both Approaches) (One Direction Only) Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural 1 1 12,000 8,400 1,200 850 2 + 3,100 1 864 14,400 10,080 1,200 850 2 + 2 + 14,400 10.080 1,600 1,120 1 2 + 12,000 8,400 1,600 1.120 Combination of CONDITIONS A + B Satisfied Not Satisfied XX 2 CONDITIONS 2 CONDITIONS No one condition satisfied, but following conditions 80% 80% fulfilled 80% of more ..... A B 32% 22% Note: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where it is not reasonable to count actual traffic volumes. The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project TIA ��URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA (JN:08850) CROSSROADS U:\UcJobs\_08600-09000\_o8800\08a50\signal Warrants\Future(Dai1y)\03_E+P 3.3-7 California MUTCD(FHWA's MUTCD 2012, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-103 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Average Traffic Estimate Form) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS E+P DIST CO RTE PM CALC JC DATE 10/02/13 Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore CHK DATE Major Street:Ardenwood Way (INS) Critical Approach Speed (Major) 35 mph Minor Street: Driveway 2 (EW) Critical Approach Speed (Minor) 35 rnph Major Street Approach Lanes = 1 lane Minor Street Approach Lane! 1 lane Major Street Future ADT = 2,260 vpd Minor Street Future ADT = 232 vpd Speed limit or critical speed on major street traffic > 64 km/h (40 mph); .......... or URBAN (U) In built up area of isolated community of< 10,000 population .... .. ..... _. (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note) URBAN_ RURAL Minimum Requirements xx EADT CONDITION A - Minimum Vehicular Volume Vehicles Per Day Satisfied Not Satisfied Vehicles Per Day on on Higher-Volume xx Major Street Minor Street Approach Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach (Total of Both Approaches) (One Direction Only) Maior Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural 1 2,260 1 232 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680 2 + 1 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680 2 + 2 + 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 1 2 + 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 CONDITION B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic Vehicles Per Day Satisfied Not Satisfied Vehicles Per Day on Higher-Volume xx on Major Street Minor Street Approach Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach (Total of Both Approaches) (One Direction Only) Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural 1 2,260 1 232 12,000 8,400 1,200 850 2 + 1 14,400 10,080 1.200 850 2 + 2 + 14,400 10,080 1,600 1,120 1 2 + 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120 Combination of CONDITIONS A + B Satisfied Not Satisfied xx 2 CONDITIONS 2 CONDITIONS No one condition satisfied, but following conditions 80% 80% fulfilled 80% of more ..... A B 10% 19°/. Note: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where it is not reasonable to count actual traffic volumes. The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project TIA L[ !#►URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN:08850) CROSSROADS U:\UcJobs\-08600-09000\-08800\08850\SignaI Warrants\Future(Dai1y)\04_E+P 3.3-8 Opening Year (2015) Without Project Conditions 1 3-9 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 3.3-10 California MUTCD 2012 Edition (FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour Traffic Conditions = 2015 Without Project Conditions -Weekday AM Peak Hour Major Street Name = Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 928 Number of Approach Lanes on Major Street = 2 Minor Street Name = Sunblaze Rd. (INS) High Volume Approach (VPH) = 137 Number of Approach Lanes On Minor Street = 1 SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED 700 a > 600 - s U lC O 500 - Q CL Q a1 400 E O 300 N .c rn = 200 d 137 (n 100 C 6 0 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Major Street -Total of Both Approaches (VPH) --C)--1 Lane(Major)&1 Lane(Minor) �—2+Lanes(Major)&1 Lane(Minor)OR 1 Lane(Major)&2+Lanes(Minor) �—2+Lanes(Major)&2+Lanes(Minor) —i(—Major Street Approaches —-0—-Minor Street Approaches *Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with one lane Trieste Residential(TTM 36624) Project TIA OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA (JN:08850) CRossRos►os U IUcJobsl 08600-090001_088001088501Signal Warrants102_2015NP103_AWFig 4C-3(Urban Peak) 3.3-11 California MUTCD 2012 Edition (FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour Traffic Conditions = 2015 Without Project Conditions -Weekday PM Peak Hour Major Street Name= Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 360 Number of Approach Lanes on Major Street = 2 Minor Street Name = Sunblaze Rd. (INS) High Volume Approach (VPH) = 72 Number of Approach Lanes On Minor Street= 1 SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED 700 - x a > 600 - z U f0 `O 500 — Q Q. Q 400 - M O 300 m = 200 — — N m 0 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Major Street -Total of Both Approaches (VPH) —0—1 Lane(Major)&1 Lane(Minor) --mb—2+Lanes(Major)&1 Lane(Minor)OR 1 Lane(Major)&2+Lanes(Minor) ---0 —2+Lanes(Major)&2+Lanes(Minor) —K—Major Street Approaches —-Mc—-Minor Street Approaches `Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with one lane Trieste Residential(TTM 36624) Project TIA ��► URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA (JN:08850) CROSSRC)^nS U 9UcJobsl 08600-090001_088001088501SgnM WanantsW2 2015NP103_PMTog 4C-3(Urban Peak) 3.3-12 Opening Year (2015) With Project Conditions 3.3-13 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 3.3-14 California MUTCD(FHWA's MUTCD 2012, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-103 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Average Traffic Estimate Form) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 2015 With Project DIST CO RTE PM CALC JC DATE 10/02/13 Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore CHK DATE Major Street: Rosetta Canyon Drive (EW) Critical Approach Speed (Major) 40 mph Minor Street:-Su n blaze Road (NS) Critical Approach Speed (Minor) 35 mph Major Street Approach Lanes = 2 lane Minor Street Approach Lane: 1 lane Major Street Future ADT= 4,274 vpd Minor Street Future ADT= 980 vpd Speed limit or critical speed on major street traffic>64 km/h (40 mph); .......... or RURAL (R) In built up area of isolated community of< 10,000 population ........................ (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note) URBAN RURAL Minimum Requirements XX EADT CONDITION A - Minimum Vehicular Volume Vehicles Per Day Satisfied Not Satisfied Vehicles Per Day on on Higher-Volume XX Major Street Minor Street Approach Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach (Total of Both Approaches) (One Direction Only) Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural 1 1 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680 2 + 4,274 1 980 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680 2 + 2+ 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 1 2 + 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 CONDITION B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic Vehicles Per Day Satisfied Not Satisfied Vehicles Per Day on Higher-Volume XX on Major Street Minor Street Approach Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach (Total of Both Approaches) (One Direction Only) Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural 1 1 12,000 8,400 1,200 850 2 + 4,274 1 980 14,400 10,080 1,200 850 2 + 2 + 14,400 10,080 1,600 1,120 1 2 + 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120 Combination of CONDITIONS A + B Satisfied Not Satisfied XX 2 CONDITIONS 2 CONDITIONS No one condition satisfied, but following conditions 80% 80% fulfilled 80% of more ..... A B 41% 30`, Note: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where it is not reasonable to count actual traffic volumes. The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project TIA OURBANCity of Lake Elsinore, CA (JN:08850) UAUcJobs\_08600-09000\_08800\08850\Signal Warrants\Future(Daily)\03_2015WP 3.3-15 California MUTCD(FHWA's MUTCD 2012, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-103 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet (Average Traffic Estimate Form) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 2015 With Project DIST CO RTE PM CALC JC DATE 10/02/13 Jurisdiction: City of Lake Elsinore CHK DATE Major Street:Ardenwood Way (NS) Critical Approach Speed (Major) 35 mph Minor Street: Driveway 2 (EW) Critical Approach Speed (Minor) 35 mph Major Street Approach Lanes = 1 lane Minor Street Approach Lane: 1 lane Major Street Future ADT = 2,590 vpd Minor Street Future ADT= 232 vpd Speed limit or critical speed on major street traffic>64 km/h (40 mph); ...1. .... or URBAN (U) In built up area of isolated community of< 10,000 population ........................ (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note) URBAN RURAL Minimum Requirements XX EADT CONDITION A - Minimum Vehicular Volume Vehicles Per Day Satisfied Not Satisfied Vehicles Per Day on on Higher-Volume XX Major Street Minor Street Approach Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach (Total of Both Approaches) (One Direction Only) Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural 1 2,590 1 232 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680 2 + 1 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680 2 + 2 + 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 1 2 + 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 CONDITION B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic Vehicles Per Day Satisfied Not Satisfied Vehicles Per Day on Higher-Volume XX on Major Street Minor Street Approach Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach (Total of Both Approaches) (One Direction Only) Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural 1 2,590 1 232 12,000 8,400 1,200 850 2 + 1 14,400 10,080 1,200 850 2 + 2+ 14,400 10,080 1,600 1,120 1 2 + 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120 Combination of CONDITIONS A + B Satisfied Not Satisfied XX 2 CONDITIONS 2 CONDITIONS No one condition satisfied, but following conditions 80% 80% fulfilled 80% of more ..... A B 1011/o 191%� Note: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where it is not reasonable to count actual traffic volumes. The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project TIA ��►URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA (JN:08850) CROSSROADS U:\UcJobs\_08600-09000\_08800\08850\Signal Warrants\Future(Daily)\04_2015WP 3.3-16 APPENDIX 5.1 Existing plus Project Conditions Intersection Operations Analysis Worksheets Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAriCity of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN.08850-03 Report) E + P AM Wed Oct 2, 2013 22:02:05 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Existing + Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Central Av. (SR-74) (NS) / Ardenwood Wy. (EW) ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec) : 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.477 Loss Time (sec) : 12 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 19.1 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 32 32 10 32 32 10 10 10 10 33 33 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1111 60 11 1415 0 0 0 0 92 0 18 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1111 60 11 1415 0 0 0 0 92 0 18 Added Vol: 0 2 7 1 7 0 0 0 0 20 0 4 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1113 67 12 1422 0 0 0 0 112 0 22 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 1172 71 13 1497 0 0 0 0 118 0 23 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1172 71 13 1497 0 0 0 0 118 0 23 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1172 71 13 1497 0 0 0 0 118 0 23 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 2.83 0.17 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 1900 4848 292 1805 3610 0 0 1900 0 1805 0 1615 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.01 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.01 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.15 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.28 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.05 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.05 Delay/Veh: 0.0 21.9 21.9 43.9 15.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.0 0.0 32.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 21.9 21.9 43.9 15.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.0 0.0 32.0 LOS by Move: A C C D B A A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 11 11 0 18 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 5.1-1 E + P AM Wed Oct 2, 2013 22:02:05 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Existing + Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Central Av. (SR-74) (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) Cycle (sec) : 90 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.525 Loss Time (sec) : 12 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 21.8 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 32 32 10 10 0 0 0 0 33 0 33 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 877 252 150 1122 0 0 0 0 304 0 143 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 877 252 150 1122 0 0 0 0 304 0 143 Added Vol: 0 4 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 7 0 4 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 881 254 151 1123 0 0 0 0 311 0 147 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 942 272 161 1201 0 0 0 0 333 0 157 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 942 272 161 1201 0 0 0 0 333 0 157 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 942 272 161 1201 0 0 0 0 333 0 157 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 0 5187 1615 1805 3610 0 0 0 0 1805 0 1615 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.18 0.17 0.09 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.10 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.14 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.37 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.51 0.47 0.62 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.27 Delay/Veh: 0.0 23.1 23.1 40.7 17.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.7 0.0 20.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 23.1 23.1 40.7 17.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.7 0.0 20.2 LOS by Move: A C C D B A A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 7 6 5 14 0 0 0 0 7 0 3 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 5.1-2 MITIG8 - E + P AM Thu Oct 3, 2013 22:38:06 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Existing + Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Sunblaze Rd. (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 3.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: D[ 26.0] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------11---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 50 0 73 34 368 0 0 374 48 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 50 0 73 34 368 0 0 374 48 Added Vol: 11 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 11 0 3 50 0 73 34 368 4 1 374 48 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 PHF Volume: 17 0 5 79 0 115 54 580 6 2 590 76 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 17 0 5 79 0 115 54 580 6 2 590 76 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 989 1360 293 1028 1325 333 666 xxxx xxxxx 587 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 204 150 709 191 157 669 933 xxxx xxxxx 998 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 161 141 709 181 148 669 933 xxxx xxxxx 998 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.11 0.00 0.01 0.44 0.00 0.17 0.06 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.6 0.2 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 11.5 9.1 xxxx xxxxx 8.6 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * B A * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx 193 xxxxx 181 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.4 xxxxx 2.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 26.0 xxxxx 39.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * D * E ApproachDel: 26.0 22.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: D C ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 5.1-3 MITIG8 - E + P AM Thu Oct 3, 2013 22:39:52 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Existing + Project Conditions With Improvements AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Sunblaze Rd. (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.580 Loss Time (sec) : 0 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 15.8 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 50 0 73 34 368 0 0 374 48 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 50 0 73 34 368 0 0 374 48 Added Vol: 11 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 11 0 3 50 0 73 34 368 4 1 374 48 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 PHF Volume: 17 0 5 79 0 115 54 580 6 2 590 76 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 17 0 5 79 0 115 54 580 6 2 590 76 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 17 0 5 79 0 115 54 580 6 2 590 76 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.79 0.00 0.21 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.98 0.02 0.01 1.77 0.22 Final Sat. : 342 0 93 431 0 503 484 1041 11 3 1029 134 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 xxxx 0.05 0.18 xxxx 0.23 0.11 0.56 0.56 0.58 0.57 0.57 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 11.1 0.0 11.1 12.2 0.0 11.2 10.8 17.2 17.2 16.6 16.3 15.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 11.1 0.0 11.1 12.2 0.0 11.2 10.8 17.2 17.2 16.6 16.3 15.9 LOS by Move: B * B B * B B C C C C C ApproachDel: 11.1 11.6 16.7 16.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 11.1 11.6 16.7 16.3 LOS by Appr: B B C C Al1WayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 5.1-4 E + P AM Wed Oct 2, 2013 22:02:05 Page 8-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Existing + Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Ardenwood Wy. (NS) / Dwy. 2 (EW) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 1.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.11 ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I--------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 71 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 71 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 8 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 24 0 0 0 PasserByvol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 8 71 0 0 110 1 3 0 24 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 9 77 0 0 120 1 3 0 26 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 9 77 0 0 120 1 3 0 26 0 0 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 121 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 215 215 120 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 1480 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 778 687 937 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 1480 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 775 682 937 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 915 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.1 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * A ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 5.1-5 E + P PM Wed Oct 2, 2013 22:03:06 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Existing + Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx**xx***xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Intersection #1 Central Av. (SR-74) (NS) / Ardenwood Wy. (EW) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*xxxxxxxxxxxxx**xxxxxxxxxxxx*xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cycle (sec) : 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.385 Loss Time (sec) : 12 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 17.1 Optimal Cycle: 87 Level Of Service: B xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 32 32 10 32 32 10 10 10 10 33 33 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1525 96 12 1002 0 0 0 0 50 0 11 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1525 96 12 1002 0 0 0 0 50 0 it Added Vol: 0 8 23 5 5 0 0 0 0 13 0 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1533 119 17 1007 0 0 0 0 63 0 14 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 PHF Volume: 0 1563 121 17 1027 0 0 0 0 64 0 14 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1563 121 17 1027 0 0 0 0 64 0 14 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1563 121 17 1027 0 0 0 0 64 0 14 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 2.78 0.22 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 1900 4760 370 1805 3610 0 0 1900 0 1805 0 1615 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.01 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.01 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.08 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.28 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.61 0.61 0.12 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.03 Delay/Veh: 0.0 19.1 19.1 51.3 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.8 0.0 31.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 19.1 19.1 51.3 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.8 0.0 31.8 LOS by Move: A B B D B A A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 16 16 1 10 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 5.1-6 E + P PM Wed Oct 2, 2013 22:03:06 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Existing + Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Central Av. (SR-74) (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) Cycle (sec) : 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.406 Loss Time (sec) : 12 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 16.5 Optimal Cycle: 87 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------► Control: Permitted Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 32 32 10 10 0 0 0 0 33 0 33 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1392 144 19 897 0 0 0 0 117 0 16 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1392 144 19 897 0 0 0 0 117 0 16 Added Vol: 0 3 8 5 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1395 152 24 902 0 0 0 0 122 0 19 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 0 1456 159 25 942 0 0 0 0 127 0 20 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1456 159 25 942 0 0 0 0 127 0 20 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1456 159 25 942 0 0 0 0 127 0 20 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 0 5187 1615 1805 3610 0 0 0 0 1805 0 1615 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.28 0.10 0.01 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.01 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.08 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.28 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.52 0.18 0.17 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.04 Delay/Veh: 0.0 17.7 14.1 51.7 11.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.2 0.0 32.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 17.7 14.1 51.7 11.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.2 0.0 32.0 LOS by Move: A B B D B A A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 12 3 1 9 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 5.1-7 MITIG8 - E + P PM Thu Oct 3, 2013 22:38:34 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Existing + Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Sunblaze Rd. (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 3.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 10.81 ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 9 0 55 65 98 0 0 78 15 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 9 0 55 65 98 0 0 78 15 Added Vol: 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 13 4 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 8 0 2 9 0 55 65 98 13 4 78 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 9 0 2 10 0 58 69 104 14 4 83 16 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 9 0 2 10 0 58 69 104 14 4 83 16 ------------1---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------i---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 299 357 59 290 355 49 99 xxxx xxxxx 118 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 636 573 1001 646 573 1015 1507 xxxx xxxxx 1483 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 577 545 1001 620 546 1015 1507 xxxx xxxxx 1483 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.06 0.05 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.2 0.1 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.8 7.5 xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * A A * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx 630 xxxxx 620 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 10.8 xxxxx 10.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * B * B Approach Del: 10.8 9.1 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B A ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 5.1-8 MITIG8 - E + P PM Thu Oct 3, 2013 22:40:10 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Existing + Project Conditions With Improvements PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Sunblaze Rd. (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.105 Loss Time (sec) : 0 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 8.0 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 9 0 55 65 98 0 0 78 15 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 9 0 55 65 98 0 0 78 15 Added Vol: 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 13 4 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 8 0 2 9 0 55 65 98 13 4 78 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 9 0 2 10 0 58 69 104 14 4 83 16 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 9 0 2 10 0 58 69 104 14 4 83 16 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 9 0 2 10 0 58 69 104 14 4 83 16 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.80 0.00 0.20 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.77 0.23 0.08 1.61 0.31 Final Sat. : 520 0 130 607 0 762 655 1291 175 59 1186 235 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 xxxx 0.02 0.02 xxxx 0.08 0.11 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 8.4 0.0 8.4 8.5 0.0 7.5 8.7 8.0 7.8 8.0 7.8 7.7 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 8.4 0.0 8.4 8.5 0.0 7.5 8.7 8.0 7.8 8.0 7.8 7.7 LOS by Move: A * A A * A A A A A A A ApproachDel: 8.4 7.7 8.2 7.8 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 8.4 7.7 8.2 7.8 LOS by Appr: A A A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 5.1-9 E + P PM Wed Oct 2, 2013 22:03:06 Page 8-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Existing + Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Ardenwood Wy. (NS) / Dwy. 2 (EW) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 1.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.8] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 108 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 108 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 27 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 16 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 27 108 0 0 61 3 2 0 16 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 29 117 0 0 66 3 2 0 17 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 29 117 0 0 66 3 2 0 17 0 0 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 70 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 244 244 68 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 1544 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 749 661 1001 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 1544 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 738 649 1001 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 963 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.8 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.8 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 5.1-10 APPENDIX 6.1 Opening Year (2015) Without Project Conditions Intersection Operations Analysis Worksheets Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis �� URBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JM 08850-03 Report) CROSSROADS OY NP AM Wed Oct 2, 2013 22:01:39 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Opening Year (2015) Without Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Central Av. (SR-74) (NS) / Ardenwood Wy. (EW) Cycle (sec) : 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.510 Loss Time (sec) : 12 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 19.8 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 32 32 10 32 32 10 10 10 10 33 33 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1189 67 11 1533 0 0 0 0 ill 0 19 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1189 67 11 1533 0 0 0 0 ill 0 19 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 1252 71 12 1614 0 0 0 0 117 0 20 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1252 71 12 1614 0 0 0 0 117 0 20 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1252 71 12 1614 0 0 0 0 117 0 20 ------------I---------------11---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 2.84 0.16 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1900 4871 274 1805 3610 0 0 1900 0 1805 0 1615 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.01 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.01 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.15 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.28 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.04 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.05 Delay/Veh: 0.0 22.4 22.4 43.8 16.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.0 0.0 32.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 22.4 22.4 43.8 16.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.0 0.0 32.0 LOS by Move: A C C D B A A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 13 13 0 21 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 6.1-1 OY NP AM Wed Oct 2, 2013 22:01:39 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Opening Year (2015) Without Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Central Av. (SR-74) (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec) : 90 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.582 Loss Time (sec) : 12 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 22.6 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 32 32 10 10 0 0 0 0 33 0 33 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 929 279 163 1179 0 0 0 0 365 0 157 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 929 279 163 1179 0 0 0 0 365 0 157 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 994 298 174 1261 0 0 0 0 390 0 168 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 994 298 174 1261 0 0 0 0 390 0 168 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 994 298 174 1261 0 0 0 0 390 0 168 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 5187 1615 1805 3610 0 0 0 0 1805 0 1615 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.19 0.18 0.10 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.10 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.14 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.37 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.54 0.52 0.67 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.28 Delay/Veh: 0.0 23.4 23.8 43.0 18.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.4 0.0 20.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 23.4 23.8 43.0 18.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.4 0.0 20.4 LOS by Move: A C C D B A A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 8 6 6 15 0 0 0 0 9 0 3 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 6.1-2 MITIG8 - OY NP AM Thu Oct 3, 2013 19:23:01 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Opening Year (2015) Without Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Sunblaze Rd. (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 3.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 23.2] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 52 0 85 38 403 0 0 437 50 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 52 0 85 38 403 0 0 437 50 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 82 0 134 60 636 0 0 689 79 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 82 0 134 60 636 0 0 689 79 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1166 xxxx 384 768 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 190 xxxx 620 855 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx. xxxxx Move Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 180 xxxx 620 855 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.46 xxxx 0.22 0.07 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------I---------------{ I---------------II---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.1 xxxx 0.8 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 40.8 xxxx 12.4 9.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * E * B A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx 23.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * C ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 6.1-3 MITIG8 - OY NP AM Thu Oct 3, 2013 20:23:42 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Opening Year (2015) Without Project Conditions With Improvements AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Sunblaze Rd. (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.668 Loss Time (sec) : 0 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 18.6 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------11---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 ------------i---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 52 0 85 38 403 0 0 437 50 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 52 0 85 38 403 0 0 437 50 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 82 0 134 60 636 0 0 689 79 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 82 0 134 60 636 0 0 689 79 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 82 0 134 60 636 0 0 689 79 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.79 0.21 Final Sat. : 0 0 0 425 0 496 472 1026 0 0 1032 120 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.19 xxxx 0.27 0.13 0.62 xxxx xxxx 0.67 0.66 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 11.8 11.2 19.8 0.0 0.0 20.0 19.4 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 11.8 11.2 19.8 0.0 0.0 20.0 19.4 LOS by Move: * * * B * B B C * * C C ApproachDel: xxxxxx 12.1 19.1 20.0 Delay Adj: xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: xxxxxx 12.1 19.1 20.0 LOS by Appr: * B C C Al1WayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.1 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.8 1.7 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 6.1-4 OY NP PM Wed Oct 2, 2013 22:00:17 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Opening Year (2015) Without Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Central Av. (SR-74) (NS) / Ardenwood Wy. (EW) Cycle (sec) : 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.410 Loss Time (sec) : 12 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 17.7 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 32 32 10 32 32 10 10 10 10 33 33 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1676 116 12 1105 0 0 0 0 62 0 11 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1676 116 12 1105 0 0 0 0 62 0 11 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 PHF Volume: 0 1708 118 12 1126 0 0 0 0 63 0 11 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1708 118 12 1126 0 0 0 0 63 0 11 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1708 118 12 1126 0 0 0 0 63 0 11 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 2.81 0.19 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 1900 4803 332 1805 3610 0 0 1900 0 1805 0 1615 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.01 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.01 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.08 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.28 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.66 0.66 0.08 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.03 Delay/Veh: 0.0 20.1 20.1 51.0 12.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.8 0.0 31.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 20.1 20.1 51.0 12.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.8 0.0 31.8 LOS by Move: A C C D B A A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 18 18 0 12 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 6.1-5 OY NP PM Wed Oct 2, 2013 22:00:17 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Opening Year (2015) Without Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Central Av. (SR-74) (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) Cycle (sec) : 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.447 Loss Time (sec) : 12 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 17.1 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 32 32 10 10 0 0 0 0 33 0 33 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1482 205 26 963 0 0 0 0 154 0 22 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1482 205 26 963 0 0 0 0 154 0 22 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 0 1547 214 27 1005 0 0 0 0 161 0 23 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1547 214 27 1005 0 0 0 0 161 0 23 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1547 214 27 1005 0 0 0 0 161 0 23 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 0 5187 1615 1805 3610 0 0 0 0 1805 0 1615 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.30 0.13 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.01 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.08 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.28 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.55 0.24 0.18 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.05 Delay/Veh: 0.0 18.2 14.7 51.8 11.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.0 0.0 32.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 18.2 14.7 51.8 11.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.0 0.0 32.0 LOS by Move: A B B D B A A A A D A C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 13 4 1 10 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 6.1-6 MITIG8 - OY NP PM Thu Oct 3, 2013 19:23:15 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Opening Year (2015) Without Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Sunblaze Rd. (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 2.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.2] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 9 0 63 79 152 0 0 113 16 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 9 0 63 79 152 0 0 113 16 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 10 0 67 84 162 0 0 120 17 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 10 0 67 84 162 0 0 120 17 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxrx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 377 xxxx 69 137 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 603 xxxx 987 1459 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx 576 xxxx 987 1459 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx 0.07 0.06 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx 0.2 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 11.4 xxxx 8.9 7.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * B * A A Movement: LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx 9.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * A ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 6.1-7 MITIG8 - OY NP PM Fri Oct 4, 2013 03:12:42 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Opening Year (2015) Without Project Conditions With Improvements PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) **xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx******xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Intersection #3 Sunblaze Rd. (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*******xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.130 Loss Time (sec) : 0 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 8.3 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx****xxxx******xx****xxxx****xxx Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 ------------1---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 9 0 63 79 152 0 0 113 16 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 9 0 63 79 152 0 0 113 16 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 10 0 67 84 162 0 0 120 17 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 10 0 67 84 162 0 0 120 17 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 10 0 67 84 162 0 0 120 17 ------------I---------------II---------------11---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.75 0.25 Final Sat. : 0 0 0 586 0 728 648 1423 0 0 1276 184 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx 0.09 0.13 0.11 xxxx xxxx 0.09 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.6 0.0 7.8 9.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 8.0 7.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.6 0.0 7.8 9.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 8.0 7.9 LOS by Move: * * * A * A A A * * A A ApproachDel: xxxxxx 7.9 8.5 8.0 Delay Adj: xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: xxxxxx 7.9 8.5 8.0 LOS by Appr: * A A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 xxxxxxxx**xxxxx****xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*******xxxxxxxxxx******xxxxxxx Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ***xxxxxxxxxxx*xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*xxxxxxxxxx*****xxxxx*xx Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE APPENDIX 6.2 Opening Year (2015) With Project Conditions Intersection Operations Analysis Worksheets Trieste Residential(TTM 36624)Project Traffic Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Lake Elsinore, CA(JN:08850-03 Report) CROSSROADS OY WP AM Wed Oct 2, 2013 21:58:14 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Opening Year (2015) With Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) +xxxxx+xxxxxxxx+++x+x++++++++xxxxxxxxxxxx+xxxx++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Intersection #1 Central Av. (SR-74) (NS) / Ardenwood Wy. (EW) +x+xxxxxxxxxxxxx++++x+++++++++x+x+++xxxxxxxxx+xxxxx+x+++++xx+x+x+xx++*++x++++x++ Cycle (sec) : 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.516 Loss Time (sec) : 12 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 20.0 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C xxxxxx++xxxxx+xxxxxxxxxxx+x+++++++x++xxxx+xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx+xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 32 32 10 32 32 10 10 10 10 33 33 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1189 67 11 1533 0 0 0 0 ill 0 19 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1189 67 11 1533 0 0 0 0 ill 0 19 Added Vol: 0 2 7 1 7 0 0 0 0 20 0 4 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1191 74 12 1540 0 0 0 0 131 0 23 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 1254 78 13 1621 0 0 0 0 138 0 24 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1254 78 13 1621 0 0 0 0 138 0 24 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1254 78 13 1621 0 0 0 0 138 0 24 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 2.82 0.18 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 1900 4840 301 1805 3610 0 0 1900 0 1805 0 1615 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.01 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.01 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.15 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.28 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.05 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.05 Delay/Veh: 0.0 22.5 22.5 43.9 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.5 0.0 32.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 22.5 22.5 43.9 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.5 0.0 32.1 LOS by Move: A C C D B A A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 13 13 0 21 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx+x+x++x++++++xx+xxxxxxxxx+xx+xxx++xxxxxxxx+xx+++x+++++x+x++xx+xx Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 6.2-1 OY WP AM Wed Oct 2, 2013 21:58:14 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Opening Year (2015) With Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ++*+*+++++++*++++++++++++++***++*+++++++++*+*+++++++*+++****++++++++++++++++++++ Intersection #2 Central Av. (SR-74) (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) Cycle (sec) : 90 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.588 Loss Time (sec) : 12 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 22.7 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C *+++*+***+++++++++*+++*++++*****+*++*++*++++++***+++**+**++*+*+++***++++++++**++ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------11---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 32 32 10 10 0 0 0 0 33 0 33 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 929 279 163 1179 0 0 0 0 365 0 157 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 929 279 163 1179 0 0 0 0 365 0 157 Added Vol: 0 4 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 7 0 4 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 933 281 164 1180 0 0 0 0 372 0 161 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 998 301 175 1262 0 0 0 0 398 0 172 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 998 301 175 1262 0 0 0 0 398 0 172 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 998 301 175 1262 0 0 0 0 398 0 172 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 0 5187 1615 1805 3610 0 0 0 0 1805 0 1615 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------i Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.10 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.11 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.14 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.37 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.54 0.52 0.67 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.29 Delay/Veh: 0.0 23.5 23.8 43.2 18.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.7 0.0 20.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 23.5 23.8 43.2 18.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.7 0.0 20.5 LOS by Move: A C C D B A A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 8 6 6 15 0 0 0 0 10 0 3 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 6.2-2 MITIG8 - OY WP AM Thu Oct_ 3, 2013 19:22:08 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Opening Year (2015) With Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Sunblaze Rd. (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) *++++++++++*+++++++++*+++*+++++++++**++*+++++++++++++++++*+++++++++++++++*++++++ Average Delay (sec/veh) : 4.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: D[ 33.0] ++++++++++*++**+++****+*+**+*++++++**++*++***++*++++*++++++++++++++++++++++++*++ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------i Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 52 0 85 38 403 0 0 437 50 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 52 0 85 38 403 0 0 437 50 Added Vol: 11 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 11 0 3 52 0 85 38 403 4 1 437 50 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 PHF Volume: 17 0 5 82 0 134 60 636 6 2 689 79 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 17 0 5 82 0 134 60 636 6 2 689 79 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1106 1530 321 1170 1494 384 768 xxxx xxxxx 642 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 167 118 681 151 124 620 855 xxxx xxxxx 952 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 124 110 681 141 115 620 855 xxxx xxxxx 952 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.14 0.00 0.01 0.58 0.00 0.22 0.07 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.8 0.2 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 12.4 9.5 xxxx xxxxx 8.8 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * B A * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx 150 xxxxx 141 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.5 xxxxx 3.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 33.0 xxxxx 60.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.8 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * D * F * * * * * A ApproachDel: 33.0 30.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: D D +++*+++*++++++*+++*++**++*++++*+++++++++++**++*+**+*++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ++++*+*+++++++***++*+*+++++++++++++++++*+++*+++++++*+++++++*+++++++++*++++*+++++ Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 6.2-3 MITIG8 - OY WP AM Thu Oct 3, 2013 20:27:33 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Opening Year (2015) With Project Conditions With Improvements AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Sunblaze Rd. (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.691 Loss Time (sec) : 0 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 19.5 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 52 0 85 38 403 0 0 437 50 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 52 0 85 38 403 0 0 437 50 Added Vol: 11 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 11 0 3 52 0 85 38 403 4 1 437 50 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 PHF Volume: 17 0 5 82 0 134 60 636 6 2 689 79 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 17 0 5 82 0 134 60 636 6 2 689 79 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 17 0 5 82 0 134 60 636 6 2 689 79 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.79 0.00 0.21 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.98 0.02 0.01 1.79 0.20 Final Sat. : 332 0 91 414 0 481 463 996 10 2 1007 117 ------------I---------------II---------------il---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 xxxx 0.05 0.20 xxxx 0.28 0.13 0.64 0.64 0.69 0.68 0.68 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 11.4 0.0 11.4 12.8 0.0 12.2 11.3 20.9 20.9 21.7 21.2 20.6 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 11.4 0.0 11.4 12.8 0.0 12.2 11.3 20.9 20.9 21.7 21.2 20.6 LOS by Move: B * B B * B B C C C C C ApproachDel: 11.4 12.4 20.1 21.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 11.4 12.4 20.1 21.1 LOS by Appr: B B C C Al1WayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 1.6 1.6 2.0 1.8 1.8 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 6.2-4 OY WP AM Wed Oct 2, 2013 21:58:14 Page 8-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Opening Year (2015) With Project Conditions AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Ardenwood Wy. (NS) / Dwy. 2 (EW) ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 1.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.2] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 79 0 0 129 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 79 0 0 129 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 8 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 24 0 0 0 PasserByvol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 8 79 0 0 129 1 3 0 24 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 9 86 0 0 140 1 3 0 26 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 9 86 0 0 140 1 3 0 26 0 0 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 141 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 244 244 141 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 1454 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 749 661 912 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 1454 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 745 657 912 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 890 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.2 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 6.2-5 OY WP PM Wed Oct 2, 2013 21:56:38 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (,TN: 08850) Opening Year (2015) With Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Central Av. (SR-74) (NS) / Ardenwood Wy. (EW) Cycle (sec) : 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.423 Loss Time (sec) : 12 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 18.0 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 32 32 10 32 32 10 10 10 10 33 33 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes; 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1676 116 12 1105 0 0 0 0 62 0 11 Growth Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1676 116 12 1105 0 0 0 0 62 0 11 Added Vol: 0 8 23 5 5 0 0 0 0 13 0 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1684 139 17 1110 0 0 0 0 75 0 14 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 PHF Volume: 0 1717 142 17 1131 0 0 0 0 76 0 14 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1717 142 17 1131 0 0 0 0 76 0 14 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1717 142 17 1131 0 0 0 0 76 0 14 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 2.77 0.23 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1900 4739 391 1805 3610 0 0 1900 0 1805 0 1615 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.01 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.01 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.08 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.28 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.67 0.67 0.12 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.03 Delay/Veh: 0.0 20.4 20.4 51.3 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.1 0.0 31.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 20.4 20.4 51.3 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.1 0.0 31.8 LOS by Move: A C C D B A A A A C A C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 18 18 1 12 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 6.2-6 OY WP PM Wed Oct 2, 2013 21:56:38 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Opening Year (2015) With Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Central Av. (SR-74) (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) ***x**#x*x***************#*#x**x**x**x**#******#************#***#*#**###**###*#* Cycle (sec) : 120 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.454 Loss Time (sec) : 12 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 17.2 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 32 32 10 10 0 0 0 0 33 0 33 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1482 205 26 963 0 0 0 0 154 0 22 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1482 205 26 963 0 0 0 0 154 0 22 Added Vol: 0 3 8 5 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1485 213 31 968 0 0 0 0 159 0 25 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 0 1550 222 32 1010 0 0 0 0 166 0 26 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1550 222 32 1010 0 0 0 0 166 0 26 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1550 222 32 1010 0 0 0 0 166 0 26 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 0 5187 1615 1805 3610 0 0 0 0 1805 0 1615 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------f Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.30 0.14 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.02 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.08 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.28 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.55 0.25 0.22 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.06 Delay/Veh: 0.0 18.2 14.8 52.1 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.1 0.0 32.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 0.0 18.2 14.8 52.1 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.1 0.0 32.1 LOS by Move: A B B D B A A A A D A C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 13 4 1 10 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 ***x**********##***********x*#********x****#*##*##***#*#*****##*****#*###*#*##** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 0.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 6.2-7 MITIG8 - OY WP PM Thu Oct 3, 2013 19:22:38 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Opening Year (2015) With Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************xxxxxxxxx****x*x**********xxxxxxxxx*xxxxxxxx****x************* Intersection #3 Sunblaze Rd. (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) xx**x****x*x***x*x***xxxxx*****************xxxxxxxxx*****xxxxxx**xx************* Average Delay (sec/veh) : 3.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 11.9) *x*xxxxxxx*x****xx**xxxxxxxxx**x*****x***x**xxx*x*xxxxxxxxxx******************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 9 0 63 79 152 0 0 113 16 Growth Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 9 0 63 79 152 0 0 113 16 Added Vol: 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 13 4 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 8 0 2 9 0 63 79 152 13 4 113 16 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 9 0 2 10 0 67 84 162 14 4 120 17 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Finalvolume: 9 0 2 10 0 67 84 162 14 4 120 17 ------------I---------------il---------------II---------------II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 405 482 88 386 480 69 137 xxxx xxxxx 175 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 535 487 960 552 488 987 1459 xxxx xxxxx 1413 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 476 457 960 526 458 987 1459 xxxx xxxxx 1413 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.07 0.06 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.2 0.2 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.9 7.6 xxxx xxxxx 7.6 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * A A * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx 529 xxxxx 526 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 11.9 xxxxx 12.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.6 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * B * B * * * * * A ApproachDel: 11.9 9.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B A ******************x***x*x**xxx***********x****x***x**xx************x****x******* Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. x*xxxxxx*************xxxx**xxxxx***********xxxx**xxx****xxxxxxxxxx*xxxx*xx*xxx*x Traffix. 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 6.2-8 MITIG8 - OY WP PM Thu Oct 3, 2013 20:26:43 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Opening Year (2015) With Project Conditions With Improvements PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Sunblaze Rd. (NS) / Rosetta Cyn. Dr. (EW) Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.131 Loss Time (sec) : 0 Average Delay (sec/veh) : 8.3 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 9 0 63 79 152 0 0 113 16 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 9 0 63 79 152 0 0 113 16 Added Vol: 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 13 4 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 8 0 2 9 0 63 79 152 13 4 113 16 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 9 0 2 10 0 67 84 162 14 4 120 17 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 9 0 2 10 0 67 84 162 14 4 120 17 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 9 0 2 10 0 67 84 162 14 4 120 17 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.80 0.00 0.20 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.84 0.16 0.06 1.70 0.24 Final Sat. : 491 0 123 576 0 714 641 1309 113 42 1219 176 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 xxxx 0.02 0.02 xxxx 0.09 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.10 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 8.6 0.0 8.6 8.7 0.0 7.9 9.0 8.4 8.3 8.2 8.1 8.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 8.6 0.0 8.6 8.7 0.0 7.9 9.0 8.4 8.3 8.2 8.1 8.0 LOS by Move: A * A A * A A A A A A A Approach Del: 8.6 8.0 8.6 8.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 8.6 8.0 8.6 8.1 LOS by Appr: A A A A Al1WayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 6.2-9 OY WP PM Wed Oct 2, 2013 21:56:38 Page 8-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trieste Residential (TTM 36624) Project TIA (JN: 08850) Opening Year (2015) With Project Conditions PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Ardenwood Wy. (NS) / Dwy. 2 (EW) ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 1.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.91 ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 128 0 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 128 0 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 27 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 16 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 27 128 0 0 73 3 2 0 16 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 29 139 0 0 79 3 2 0 17 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 29 139 0 0 79 3 2 0 17 0 0 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 83 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 279 279 81 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 1527 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 715 633 985 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 1527 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 705 620 985 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 943 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.9 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.9 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * A ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to URBAN CROSSROADS, IRVINE 6.2-10