HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Reso No 2007-071RESOLUTION NO. 2007-71
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS
THAT THE PROJECT IDENTIFIED AS MAKENNA COURT
IS CONSISTENT WITH THE MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT
CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP)
WHEREAS, Georgia Hamilton of Corman Leigh Communities has filed an
application with the City of Lake Elsinare requesting approval of Residential
Design Review No. 2006-11 for eighty-one (81) single family detached residential
units and a Model Home Complex lrnown as Makenna Court (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Project Site is bounded by Machado Street on the
southeast, Terra Cotta Road on the northwest, with Zieglinde Drive to the
southwest and Broadway Street to the northeast (APN 379-150-002 &002, and 041
thru 044) (the "Project Site"); and
WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP indicates that projects which are
proposed for development in an area not covered by an MSHCP criteria cell shall
be analyzed pursuant to the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements" and that the City
of Lake Elsinore shall make findings that the Project is consistent with those
requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Project Site is not located within a criteria cell, but was
reviewed pursuant to the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements"; and
WHEREAS, on April 17, 2007, the Plauning Commission conducted a
public hearing on the Project and recommended Findings of Consistency with
MSHCP to the City Council; and
WIIEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the City
Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and
evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other
interested parties at a public meeting held with respect to this item on May 8, 2007.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
CITY COLTNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007-71
PAGE 2 OF 5
SECTION 1. The City Council has considered the Project and its
consistency with the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements" priar to adopting
Findings of Consistency.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with the MSHCP, the City Council makes
the following findings regarding consistency of the Project with the MSHCP "Plan
Wide Requirements":
1. The Project is a project under the City's MSHCP Implementing Resolution,
and the City must make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval.
Because ti~e Project Site is not located within an MSHCP Critena Cell, the
Project is required to be reviewed for consistency with the following
MSHCP `Plan Wide Requirements ": Section 61.2 Protection of
Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools, Section 6.1.3 Protection of
Narrow Endemic Plant Species, Section 6.1.4 Guidelines Pertaining to
Urban/Wildlands Interface, Section 6.3.1 Tregetation Mapping, Section 6.3.2
Additional Survey Needs and Procedures, and Section 6.4 Fuels
Management, and Section 4.0 payment of the MSHCP Local Development
Mitigation Fee.
2. The Project is subject to the Ciry's Lake Elsinore Acquisition Project
(LEAP) and the County's Joint Project Review processes.
As stated above, the Project is not located within a MSHCP Criteria Cell
and therefore it was not processed through a LEAP or Joint Project Review.
3. The Project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Verna1 Pools
Guidelines.
Pursuant to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-OS for the underlying
Tentative Tract Map No. 33486, "the Project Site is not located within any
sensitive natural community identified in Zocal or regional plans and will not
affect any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities.
Additionally, the Project is considered to be an "in-fill " development with
urban uses surrounding the site, making the likelihood of the Project Site
being biologically significant unlikely. " There are no Vernal Pools on the
Project Site. The Project is therefore consistent with the Riparian/Riverine
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007-71
PAGE 3 OF 5
Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines set forth in Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP.
No furtheY action regarding this section of the MSHCP is required.
4. The Project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant
Species Guidelines.
The Project is not subject to the Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines
set forth in Section 6.1.3. No further action regarding this section of the
MSHCP is required.
5. The Project is consistent with the Urbai~/Wildlands Interface Guidelines.
The Project is surrounded by existing urban uses (single family residential
development). Therefore, the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines set
forth in Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP are not applicable to the Project. No
further action regarding this section of the MSHCP is required.
6. The Project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
There are no resources ezisting on the Project Site that would be subject to
the requirements of Vegetation Mapping set forth in Section 6.3.1 of the
MSHCP. No further action regarding this section of the MSHCP is
required.
7. The Proj ect is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures.
Pursuant to the findings of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2005-05,
"the Project Site is not located within an area requiring surveys for
burrowing owl, sensitive amphibian species, sensitive mammal species,
narrow endemic plant species, or any other sensitive species covered under
the MSHCP. Additionally, the proposed Project Site does not contain any
special interest species that are not covered under the MSHCP that would
be expected to pose a constraint to the development of the proposed project
site. "
However, because suitable habitat for the burrowing owl, raptors and other
birds were present, the following mitigation measures were conditions prior
to site grading:
CITY COiTNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007-71
PAGE 4 OF 5
a) Prior to site grading, a presence/absence focused survey for the
burrowing owl following MSHCP survey guidelines shall be conducted
on the project site by a qualified biologist. If site clearing and grading
activities occur within the nesting peYiod (March I S through September
I S), a certified biologist shall conduct a nesting bird survey prior to any
ground-disturbing activities. All site clearing and grading shall
conform to applicable provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act;
b) Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall pay
all applicable MSHCP and Stephens' Kangaroo Rat HCP mitigation
fees.
These conditions adequately account for any potential suitable habitat for
burrowing owl on that may exist on-site. Therefore, the Project is consistent
with this section of the MSHCP, and no further actions above the pre-
grading/pre-construction surveys are required.
8. The Project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines.
As stated above, the Project is surrounded by urban development,
specifically single family residential development. Therefore, the Fuels
Management Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.4 of the MSHCP are not
applicable to the Project. No further action regarding this section of the
MSHCP is required.
9. The Project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local
Development Mitigation Fee.
The developer will be required to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development
Mitigation Fee.
10. The Project is consistent with the MSHCP.
The Project is consistent with all applicable provisions of the MSHCP. No
further actions related to the MSHCP are required.
SECTION 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the- above findings,
and the conditions of approval imposed upon the Project, the City Council finds
that the Project is consistent with the MSHCP.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007-71
PAGE 5 OF 5
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of May, 2007, by
the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: HICKMAN, KELLEY,
SCHIFFNER, MAGEE
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT
ABSTAIN: COLJNCILMEMBERS: NONE
/ ~~ i ~
Robert E. Ma
City of Lake
ATTEST:
~, La~~ p ~,~ ~ ~
Michelle Soto, Interim City Clerk
City of Lake Elsinore
City Attorney
City of Lake Elsinore