Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout_ 78-1 (2) A'� CITY,OF LAKE ELSIN(iRE • 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA 92330 Receipt No. Received By: `- TO ACCompANY APPLICATION FOR -Conditional Use Permit Type of Perm ADDRESS/LOCATION OF PROPERTY Lakeshore Drive, ]Elsinore CA_ 92330 Please Print PROPERTY OWNER Lehr - Slavick and Bon b fe }ADDRESS at-in Ave ZIP •.TELE. !11 P ease Print F1AhiE .' Orangge" CA 92665 637-7570 At1TN0RiZED REPRESETr�1TiYE NE TE B Please Print NAME ADDRESS_ ZIP TELE. 11 • 92343 658-71 A. Background Information_ 1. Briefly describe the nature of the project or activity. Dwyelopment of a Recreational Vehicle Park . 2. Specific location and Assessor's parcel number and legal description. See attached 3. Existing: General Plan and Zoning Designations. Zone: R(recreational) and commercial Ge- .,,aral Plan: , Tourist recreational. 4. Describe the project area, including distinguishing natural and manmade characteristics. Generally flat vacant land having a westerly slope. No signific *'features man-made or natural characterize the sate. 5. Is the project a phase or a portion of a larger project, or adjacent land holding? Yes No xx if yes, give date submitted and title of project. 6.. List every public agency from whom a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlements for use is necessary before completion of the projec City of Lake Elsinore Planning Department andaff�l i,ated agenciE e ' A.2. , Located adjacent the southwesterly side of approximately 1400 feet southerly of Riversj(10 Dr Drive, ''��Ie prive. Assessor's Ma •s 375-091-005; 006 and 007 375-080-001;002;003;004 & 005 374-110-001 Descri tion: A poItion of Block 3.3 through 16 inclusive; a Block 18.; Blocks 19 through 22 inclusive a Portion of Lot J ;of Block 1-1 all of and Lot 1 and as shown by map on file in mL Lakeshore Drive addition 65-67 Records of Riverside County, California, / C. U2 Topography of the ro•' ina a P )ect site is generally fiat land hav- westerly slope. A minor drainage wa Property within the easterly section. Y crosses the Soils are primarily of the Gras: fine sandy loam. Characteristics vincl.udelslow Grangeville and slight erosion hazard. runoffs and Vegetation is primarily annual grasses and forbs ` Animal life includes shall bird and ground burrowing mar..,�als. No rare or endangered plant or animal specie the area nor are any sites of historic orarchas noted for siglificance delineated. archaeological Adjacent land uses include the Elsinore Lake, va residential and recreational park u cant land, se. B. Pro ect Descri do 1. Site size (Acreage or square footage, including dissensions. Much map). Approximately 1340 feet x 1-340 feet. Approximately 41.3' acres gross. - 2._ WiII the project involve a variance, conditional use or rezoning apFlicazion? State this clearly, and indicate clearly why the application is required. City of Lake Elsinore zoning ordinance requiiegs processing of •a Conditional Use permit to allow development of a .reereat_ional vehicle bark. 3. Is the project part of a larger project involving a series-of cumulative effects? Yes No XX If yes, briefly describe the overall project. 4. If residential, include the number of dwelling units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. Will the residential development utilize federal subsidy programs such as 235, 236, 221(d)3, Section 8, etc.? N/A - 5. If commercial, indicate the type, square footage of retail sales* area, type and areas of storage, loading facilities, and whether it is neighbor- hood, community or regionally complex. - = N/A 6. If industrial, indicate type (whether primarily manufacturing or warehousing etc.), estimated employment per shift: number of shifts/day, and loading facilities_ N/A 7. If agricultural, is the principal use of this property Che propogation, care and maintenance of viable plant and/or animal products for commercial purposes? N/A 8. Amount of off-street parking proposed (if co-gnercial , industrial or high- - d-nsity residential). N/A - 2 9. Will the proj requireexpenditure c an re of publids in Excess of public- revenues gene*d by he project? Yes No Xx If yes, state th a amount of difference. 10. If a phased development is planned, estimate the total length of the- construction period for each phase. _ Project is expected to develop in a continuous Phase. - IL Provide a written description of the proposed project. (Include and describe any projects which may be necessitated as a result of approving this project; e.g., seiner and water Iine extensions and whether the - project is a phase or portion of a larger project.) Development of a -627 space recreation vehicle Hark. I rove- ments include sewer, water, dra n � �,ag� tional amenities. , landscaping and recrea- C. tnvironmem:al Setting 1. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including in- formation an topography, soil stability,, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical , archaeological or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the past and present use of the structures (Use additional sheets if necessary) - See attached - 2. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural , historical, archaeological, or scenic aspects. Indicate the predominant type of land use (residential, coarnercial , etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.;, dnd scale of development (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). (Use additional sheets if necessary.) See 'attached - 3 - . • ` server, water, school. special districts, etc.) serving the project area, and specific vices currently available th gh those districts to the. project site Project will effect existing capacity of the sewer and water facilities. This effect, while measurea'ale, is not necessarily adversely significant. The property will not effect the school_ district. 4. Is the project site located within a known -flood or dam inundation area? : Yes XX No. If yes, specify the extent of area of the project subj-ect to inundation, and proposed mitigation measures. Portion of the project would be subject to flooding_ during a major rise ir, the water level. of the adjacent lake. The nature of the project and proposed mitigating measures will reduce the adverse effects to the site should any flooding occu: 5. Is the site subject to fire hazard frn;n flammable brush, grass or trees? Yes No XX If yes, what mitigation measures are proposed. 6. Is the site subject to geologic hazards? Yes No XX If yes, specify type of hazard, and, it possible, magnitude. 7. Describe the ambient noise characteristics that are associated with the proposed project. Low ambient noise levels.. 8. Is there a private water source on site? Yes No _X If yes, specify the location of such water supply source, its avarage gallon per minute flo:: and whether it is the present primary or secondary water supply to the site. D-. Comm tr Concer 1. - Is or has the site been the subject of any serious public controversy resulting from environmental or other concerns as. set forith in the fore- going factors? . ' Yes No xac If yes, specify which factors,- the nature and extent of the controversy ; -the present state of the controversy_ E. Project impacts _ Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss a",items checked "yes" on additional she and attach as necessary. YES' N0 - Could the project 'be substantially affected by any natural c .man-made features present on or near the project site? Exan of such features -include the location and/or construction of facilities in a floodplain or natural drainage channel, near earthquake fault, immediately adjacent to a freeway or'-.in cl Proximity to an aircraft flight path. _x__ 2. Could the project substantially affect any natural or man-ma features present on or near the project site? Examples of s include change in topography, change in scenic views or vist from existing residential areas or public lands, change in p tern, scale or character of general area of the project. x 3. Could the project change ground water quality or quantity, o alteration of existing drainage patterns? x 4. Will the project involve the application, use Of d[slosal of potentially hazardous materials such as pesticides or' high explosives during -project construction and/or followins - _ completion? 5. . Will the project generate substantial amounts of solid waste = or litter during project construction and/or following compl, 6. Will the project involve construction of facilities on an F2Tco istin slope of 10 percent or greater? If yes, attach two pies of a preliminary grading plan for the project and two (2) copies of a soils report. x ' 1. Will significant amounts of noise be generated by the project during construction and/or following completion? Example trot include blasting during construction and machinery operation following �conpletion. _ _ _ 5 . r 8. H' 1 the project- result in 'be eration of significant amo?jnl _ ust, particulate matter or ical aerosols,during con- s ruction and/or following completion? X 9. Will the project significantly affect". any forn of fish, wild- life, or plant life in the- area of the project? X 10. Will the project subs;an'A ally increase fossil fuel consumptioi (electricity, natural gas, etc.)?',, F. Additional Comments Project would be .subject• k-> flooding during a Major* rise in the water level of Lake E1_sinoxe. ?Iature of project and'mitigating measures will greatly reduce the adverse effects of such a rise in water level. 3. Project will alter existing sheet flow drainage. This -drainage will be contained within improved facilities. 8. Initial short term adverse noise and adverse noise and dust effects will be present during the construction stage. Those -will cease at project completion. Mitigating measures include dust control and hourse of operation. CERTIF CATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of m e�.�,(� bel ' f. V , aRUUI� & VN9 E, INC. DATE 1/23/78 CIVIL ENGINEERS• -r_ H - NIA T2343 For LEHR, SLAVICK AND BONEBRAKE r _ 6 APPENDIX I ENUI8MINEWAL CHECKLIST rORM (To be completed by Lead Agency) J. MCKGR4UND• _ 1_ blame of Proponent LEgR fl,4MI6 S-1 2. Address andone un e o oponen • 3. -• Date or Checklist Submitted Agency Requiring Checklist �. I�Tame of Proposal, if applicable _ . 11. ENVIRONME�lAL IMPACTS ' (Explariatiohs of all "yes" and 'maybe" ans•iers are require on atiached sheets.) ' YES MAYBE 1,10 1.- Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substruct- res? 410 b. Disruptions, displacements, con= ~� paction or overcovering of the soil? �C c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? • d. The destruction, coverirb or modification of any uniqu?=Seologic ' or physical features? - e. Any increase in w1nd or water erosion of soils, either -on or off -the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or eres1011 which may modify the channel of a river or Stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, Inlet or lalci? YES MAYBE NO h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? . X 1. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards .su*ch as - ' flooding or tidal waves? x 4. Plant-Life. Will the proposal result - a. Chz:ige in -the diversity of species, or number of.any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants) b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X c. Introduction of new species of - plants into an area, or .in a barrier to the noftna.l replenishment 'of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal rew' sul��nc a: Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals- • including 'reptiles, fish-and shellfish, benthic or anisms, insects or microfaunal? b. Reduction of the numberb if any " _--_unique, rare or endangered Lx.pecies of animals? . , . c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? APPENDIX 2 FNMO:VNF=AL cH Ec.Kr iST FORM -. (To be completed by head Agency) I. BACKGROUND.- _ - 1. Name of Proponent L E1/R S1h-11116 1 fNn eF�t'�i�'r 2. Address and Phone E iiet o. opanen 1#tE N, 7 tl57*f l AO S!//rE j 04 Date of Checklist Subrillt-ed 4. Agency Requiriag' Checkl- �. Name of Proposal, if applic � le �'- dr �,ytr. ,��;,,��.,• (F�cplaxiatioris of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are require( OA attached-Sheets.). - \ YES 'MAYBE l,0 1.- Earth.` W-111 the proposal result n: - a. - Unstable earth conditions or in _ Changes in geolog;�a substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, 'co;,,- paction or overcover ng of the soil? e. Change in topography ar vound surface relief features? d. The destruction, cover i j%Z .or mod1fieation of Any unique geologic -or physical features? - e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either .on or off the site? fe Changes in deposition or erosion -or beach sands, or changes in - siltation, deposition or erosion Vhieh may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean, or any bay, Inlet or lake?- a z? YES MAYBE NO g. Exposure of people br property to- geologic hazards such as earthquakes, • landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? - _ . AL 2. ' Air. Will the proposal result in: : - a: Substznt3acl air emtssi.ons or eteriora.tion'of ambient air quality? b._ The creation of objectionable e . odors?:---- Alteration of air movement, moistare or temperature, or any - change in climate, either locally x or regionally? .---- 3, dater: trill the proposal result, in: - u_ Changes in currents, or the course - . - ent or direction of water moveirs, �.n . X 'either marine �. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patteriln, or the rate - Y r. and amount of surface- water runoff': > C. Alterations to the course or, X flow of flood waters? . d. Change in the amount of surface water In any water b0.dy? - • e. Discharge into surface waters, yr• in any alteration of surface water duality, including; nut not Iia21ted to termperature, dissolved oxygen or • r f. Alteration of the direction or rate of floe of ground raters? f-. Change in the quantity of ground _hers, -either through direct additions l or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cut-- ar e:.ca.va"Ons^ ..t YES MAYBE NO h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? . X I. Exposure of people or property . to water related hazards such as ' flooding or tidal waves? X 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result a. Cha:' e in -the diversity- of species or n�...tuber of .any species of plants ' (including trees, shrubs, EzT ss, craps, microflora and aquatic plants) . X b. Reduction of the numbers oi'_any dnique, rare or endangered species of plants? e. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or .ir, a barrier to the normal r;eplerisrment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? _ x 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal �— resu - a: Mange in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species Of animals (birds, And animals- Including reptiles, fish-and shellfish, benthic or anisms, insects or .rtierolaunal? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered speel_es of animals? c. Introduction of new species -)f animal,, Into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of e.xxl.ca�.s? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 11 YES MAYBE NO 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? ' o. Exposure of people to severe •�- noise levels? 7. Light and Glare.- Will the proposal produce nr+7 fight or glare? }( ....__ 8. iand Use. ' 1-fill the proposal result it's. a su stantial alteration of the present or -planned land use of an area? 9. -Natural Resatrces. mill the ' proposal result in. a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nc,arenewable natural resource? X 10. Risk of upset. Does the - proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? x _�- 11. Population. Will the proposal alter ' ' . the location, distribut?.ori, density, .�r growth rate of the human popu- • ]Cation of an area? 12. Housi c- Will the proposal affect exi . housing, or create a y demand for additional housinb rl 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result, in: a. Generation of substantial addi- tional vehicular movement? __ q _ 315 YM MAXSg NO b. - Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new y paV:ing? /l c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation Systems? + d. Alterations to present patterns - of circulation or movenent of people and/or goods? _ e. Alterations to waterborne, rail - or air traffic? f-. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or , pedestrians? �( 1 Public Services. mill the proposal •�- -Ttave an eriecu upon, or result in a need for new or altered govern- mental services in arty-of the following areas: a. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? c. ,Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. 14aintemnce of p.�blic facile-- ties, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal result In: a. Use of substantlal amounts of fuel or energy? b_ Substantial Increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of' energy? 16 MAYBE NO 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result In a n-_,eaor new systems, or substantial alterations to the followirg utilities: a. Poser or natural gas? b. Communications systems?-6. Hater2 t d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Stow, water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17_ Human Health. Will the proposal resu t n: a. Creation of any health hazard -or- potential health hazard (excluding _ mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential - health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result In the obstruc�ior_ of any --cenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. V1111 the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or. r. quantity of existing recreational. opportunities? 20. Archeological Historical. Will the Proposal result in an a teration of a significant archeological or . historical site, structures object or building:' _ a .' z? ACES MA NO 2L. Mandatory rindinas of significance. (a) Does the project have the potential: to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife _ population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant yr animal cos unity, reduce the numbsr or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major peri-Ods of California history or prehiutory? b. Does the project have- the p(oten-- t1al to achieve short--tex;n, to the disadvantage of long-term, environ- mental goals? (A short-tern impact on the environment is one which _ occurs in a relatively brie', definitive period of time while long-ters-a impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource ls'relati,,ely small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the - • environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environ- mental effects which will cause_ ' substantial adverse effects on hurmn beings, either directly or indirectly? III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONX-E TAL IT- A LUATIUN CQUNCtLMlENa Oly oj .CaL Elsinot* NORMAN L.CHAFFIN,May, CITY HALLLARRYCARTIER,Maya Pri EUGENE J.CARTER 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINGRE.CALIFORNIA 92330 F.G.(CY)PERKINS _ Telephone 17 7 41 674-3125 ' FRANK DePASCUALE FLORENE MARS City CHARLES R.iM01 1 City Tre JOHN M.R. City M. H.M.DOUGH1 C,ty At1 March 13, 1978 DISCUSSION OF .MMRONMENTAL EVALUATION C.U.P. 78-1 Section II Item lc A certain amount of Grading is necessary for the develop- ment, However, the Plan submitted does not show intended- G rading. Item 2a Traffic Added Traffic to and from the facility could cause decreases in local ambient Air Quality. Additional decreases in Air Quality may relult from Motor Boat activity created on the Lake. Item 3b Paving and chanelization will alter absortion rates. However, with the close proximity to the bake there should be no net Change in Ground Water Tables. Item 3i This Property is located below the 1265 MSL Elevation and suh4ect to flooding. Development in this area must be limited to uses which can minimize-flood-damage and possible Water Pollution. Item Say A small change in Animal Diversity and Wild Life Habitat is Possible because of less of open grass land where GrouLg Burrowing Mamals and Ground Nesting Birds may live. Item 5d Sewage Extreme caution must be exersized to provent any additional r deterioration of Water Quality in the Lake from this develop- went. Two (2) major sources of problems are pota;.tial; Sewage Spills and Suter Runoff containing Fertilizer and Other 21itrients. Item Ua Traffic The project will result in a considerable increase in Traffic and associated increases in Noise-Levels. Also increased Boat activity on the Lake will increase Noise Levels. Item 7 Any large number of Recreational Vehicles may cause' " some increase,' in glare. Item 8 Current Land Use is vacant. The proposal would change this to heavy Recreational use. Item 9 a&b The proposal could mean increased Recreation Travel and a concomonent increase in fuel Consumptions. Item 10 Sewage The project will involve high risk of Pollution frx--n the On-Site Sewage Lines and Pumping Facilities. Design should be so as to minimize such risk. Item 11 Permanent Residence Unless very specific measures are taken this development could result in a large number of _Permanent Residents resi,-Iing -� in the Parka Item 13 a,b,c,d, & f Traffic The current Street Facilities on Riverside Drive and Lake Shore are inadequate to handle the heavy Week-end Traffic Loads that would be created by the Development. Unless specific steps are taken to remedy the Traffic Congestion, serious problems will result from the Development and additional hazards will be created for all persons using the streets in the local area. . Item '14 A additional R.V. Facilities could require morn pire Services. However, this is difficult to -assess. • Item 14b As population densities increase, especially tourist type, more Police Protection will be needed. - item 14c Permanate Residence Winless specific steps are taken to prohibit Permanant. Residency in R.V. Parks this will result in additional burdens on our School System. Item 14e Increased Traffic on Lake Shore and Riverside will cause a need for increased Road Maintenance. Item 14f Other services such as Welfare, and Aid t•.o the Elderly could be necessary without safeguards to prevent Permanent Residency in R.V. Parks. Item 16 a,c,d, & e - No new Off-site Utilities are anticipated but On-site facilities will be necessary and increase quantities will be involved. -item 17 a & b -- Sewage Improper controll of On-site Sewerage Facilities below 1265 could result in Pollution of the Lake during periods of Rising Water or Sewerage clearage. Item is Lake View The project should not be allowed to block the View of the Lake from Lake Shore Drive. Further, the large accumulation of R.V.'s in this locality will greatly effect the local views. Item 21c If proper mitigation measures are not taken the cumulative effects of this project could have significant negative effects on the Environment. -WAT! O/CAIi/�CitTXA�-TIIE z ti • G6 so C " w: DEPAR'i)AE W OF PARKS AND RECREATION _ P.<R sox Mir - �EB2 8 1 i114 - "(915? 445-2358 ,= �EB-27iE91lk �r ��� =,- Gac,,,. M:par a 4L'F r''•f - "`�.p.s•_'-v t.. _+�k -s —'��,• _ 7''�cOs_•.', �_:1=:.T, " :+.� /�- yam.. -''�� �!!�BOba!'t-5.�11'�31I��-=•�.- � .�„=•.:,T� i _•r.,s;'�4�"St � - r . ZN" •t125 South Main•Street -' ',`• - -=` 1 ::.:--. -Eisinorer� •9?33�- u=. {.r-'i�'! 3• �t`A Z�'��t s•.Qr+y.....t2S��`�a+1.'-._� al. }�� {tea r c-Y' i r b. •i j yet-�. _ _ t-� . � �"�•��~N�% '—_��;�' �— �•�- ..h`•1_�,t r rs!�.� Y3?�'`'-`,Ftty -�.•%+�_�e Y•_ �' f"'�� �- - :IareP1Y.`to yore-letter to .=gars h 'at ` t}"� _�V- _ •- - pt Lake Elsinore State Reer--ation Araa., -ss-- tiie State Depar_tmeat;of-Parks and Recreation ?gas-severa?_ qum3tions regac-ding "- i:the Maxon subdivisich'aad mains change request. s ii State would lke-_to dcaoa if_th_e proper Rnvironmental. Impact Reports and - =;"�.:otbez reports to control agerbaies have been filed and'approved. - We would also - like to know if the development would obscure the lake Fran the view of travelers on Grand Avenue. YThls Department also feels that all zone planning and. changes of zoning should ~_ bs a Joint effort of the City, the County, the State, and possibly the La'Ke Elsinore Parks and Reere Una.blat^ict. Have these agencies been contaeted for_"their comments? _ -• - ; In,the 30 lots shown on the Drip heat you included with-:your letter, two of the lots are extremely large, right next to,Grand Avenue. Would these lots be - .zoned comwci:al.or multiple residence? 16ri response to your questions M Plan C will very -greatly_ , y -greatly change the .size and" configuration of the lake depending on the amount-of water- that is finally _ determined-to be available for use to maintain the lake- This could also create a significant change in the elevation of the lake. Therefore, it would , be impractical at this time to enter into an agreement �aoncernir-g access to or from the lake on final lake levels: -In 1976, representatives of this Department mct with Mr. John Hope, the City ~ - Manager at twat time. and discussed briefly some zoning problems. At this time we indicated to Mr. Hope that we favored that all developmant taking , place between the perimeter roads and the lake uou?d be oriented towards-' recreation or service for recreation visitors. No'c for.private dw;-:�llinga., 4 . a. �is ' �� ;4�2ir ,. z < � �i.ry�.r � s;� 'ct_�r`' ,: r�,�. s'� '• " � - ' m.}}Y .t „' i`.'r y. }', ♦ _ • •V =. L ea I ,f c. _ 7n—�Q ywY 7 .2 r sY'tl wT! M. !Robert R. Hymn €, r - • _ � _ - -- •� ,....�i--_=-- '-- - - ' '- - � _- `tilt 1`,:,..+- _ - _ -y �_� ge also feel that uoless• some mitigation measures are takenp that aA - $ub<RiVistoa of this size would increase the leve?s of pestxnldus. fertilizers --and o-ber_:deleterio='substanc es.in the lake, beo3use s t ® ebemicala are lied tha"hoe o�rners _ ��Pp „asr�bsequenL" rains and ]�.axn matey P Would leach %aw. pet ffP-e?�.c' that shauldnOt �.. - encourage additional development�of �R2Abb �8'.1 den sit «.y:.-.•c+� - _ ,�. in8 -awl*o�uid-this ppxiMter of theako without ; � • r6TV'11,s s I xW,r_as ,ate=_Mwage-:thins tation and treatmint We_ believe that~_ _ " :.�- - ,o*•=s st�c�ta?iks'°by:--populatica adjacent-to'the lake is adding --, .Mto ebe=.ae►r qua3ifcg;proble 'that.ire are having. a:x ._� .psrtm�t_of',Parks-axed=�ecY:ea�.ion . �.Y t ..,.- _ winta'ePPy to Nork with the City of re-Ele-operand-otber_apprgpriate_agencies as a joint exfort to develop z g�fix�ehs aMas aronad:the Take. ',�r_ _ .,,.�r- .r_.,_n `•" L ,f -� -'ere-�w��'r �.���•`•~` 4 - '+..'v3�C'�"��,' �'� .�� nY'"�^.f �-�. - �.+,._. ~ + '^` '"F�, ei.�"'9�i -t"�`� - ',a__i ti�•i-.a -' c%rs .�� ":�+�Y r•^Ti-+ .-r�- _a'• - _-ter_ -"'X}'!< - �-y_-.. _ 1- i -.�'L•�r�Y ��%__--E'4 s�-Y �-„-ram,-- "� •�.>- �'�r.� �c�Y-� -q-�r•� J�--�.2'E :�': <-., >4, G - .: Eu33��,4t1� �ahi-^ �r< s•s -•+ _ -�--.- 'Y - ? .--.1 - t _rr - } - -_ `-�• Pll g. C .-� _ --r"_<�=' -•ti• - _ _ -_"_r -=.il':�f f``� a�:s.,�-S __- J Director '- --. x•. _ - - --- - --- �, __ :ter - - -- -_ : --_ - - - - -_--,_" _-:�._ '.ACC i� .r �-_ — J �'j:�K�... - - =_ ��•-E - - _ ',ty� -. 'i , ___ �c�_a!-w• .�-t✓'--_.�S-.i.`.-C:.-t)•• ._ _.z ti-• :i. � _ -- Ci'4.'_A_ _ _. _ .�T{�___''•(• - _ __ _ _ rY'•'.i_ .. .T. r.• .tti:.Jy�•*_!.-L�wY_l�•_ ! � :r._T�%��� --. _ � _ _ _.._ �'-_' +q'3: ` t •eacr.�.oz.-aei�i�as'= --•.�-�r" ` � �.-%s:_z w --s-Y `-� _:S�t ''�'` = -•• ''r•; .C'-f2"w STATL Of CAUFORMA—?HE MMOURCE5 AGENCY ldkWND 0. MOW"j?..G4v+~ DEPARTMENT.OF PARKS AND RECREATION P.O. cox nso - SACRMINM i3411 322 - ; 6) -7560:(91 _ -- APR -,19 .19T8 s�6.-�Ci...r- �.....--._`.�i� �s,`�i•'-�l'_r.�y-•"',-j � __ _ -. _ �,r-r -- :. - ::"`,�- Y's< ,._'�:' 'X'�' -. • y..�.—+►.-�-�[,r� - ice_ `..-o .ri:- �'� r_� sue^ c-�.. J+� = —„� .-�•r�.• r.._.±1-w rr _ � - -` _-.-��}i'`J moist City an_er la _f-Z ==` �=► + Lake �Ll•.=1 '.." .`17��. !_C_-.wj±7}a�A.aa"vs. l�6lle Disie -� _ - G. .a.j = -t -J- .l - _ - _t� j �c•M� _ City V "130.,aouth'Haid Street" a Slsinbre,.CA 9_2330 - _ 17: - _ - - v'r._:'iy�"�-.�i'.•r�� yman i Lake Elsinore State Ree'reation'Area: -it _}...pro a rve ecr_eationposed Lkes - �Qehiole Park My 4iehrTet-41. your'lette aHr: rip Y. Forsyth;=Los I:c-gos Ares`Managor'dated rai th wsrtadedt 'u or a response.reh ; 978g r We t�auld like qur- e�1ts tha�at�e contained in our letter to you dated =` = February;2T;' 978 re _rang the Maxon Subdivision to be eonside3red-also,in _- this RVV..-pat�k d i opm��,�-esp�..aia�l y with respect to an Environmental) Ir�apact -Repo rid the_viex .ofh `' 2 frog the perimeter roads*fo In addition we would=like to_-brirg Y ur attention the =iEs: _ ' ems.,• lthe.,ResourcesAge -. . 1. Under P- 1�od ed ncy Task Forco report, dated June ,�� , theme 1`ze=oF;;thr lake woulal bP rei�ueed' to 2,0(?0 _ surface acres: t elevat on-of 1;233 feet {m s 1:; *ke J� j :. .- _ ,. •' with o, � ut'Plau°;C� those portions of the propose facilities ` -sue ut:' - 1 W. . ' 'tttaymay b2affected by.periodicaoding (b�elos��elevation 9,264 - r3:s 1.).,s(Ju be designed 'accordingly. Fe are especially interested tZsknoit-whatimeasures=are.proposed-to-prevent ..he sewage generated �'��within'thiiKdevelopme' from getting into the-'Zak such inundation 2. The development shows boat-launching-faci>:ities. We do not have an idea how many- boats could be launched from these facilities in a day. Therefore, ate are interested in knowing how this mould impact on the boating use of the lake. The Department of Navigation and Ocean Development determined that an avErage of five acres surface area is needed for each boat for safe operation on the lake. This - criterion excludes the areas on the lake for other water-oriented recreation purposes such as swimming and wading. (A eAnniveUal, - tit t eoten � ti s ari stepjoke n -� � 'w• � L-• -�i YJ7 s> Mr. Robert H. Nyman :Page 2 3,. The plans do not indicate the boat launching facility below the 1,24O elevation, During low water, the boat launching f4atlity Would have to be extended onto State land. The State would have to enter into a concession contract to allow any building on State lAnds- t - W. ` 'Before the -State would enter into any new concession, it Would need a feasibilitg report to determine the feasibility of the new facility and to shoes that the new fay:1ity would not-Jeopardize the interests of;the existing concession. A concession eontraot would *be required � to_proteat the State's interest in reference to health codes, _ cif Ahe'Lrea, and controls. Under the present concession contract the State Parks and Recreation concessionaire .(Lake Elsinore Recreation Area, Incorporated) is the _sole 4gent-for the State to sell tickets for boat launching and boating use.permits for Lake Elsinore. ; -r We thank you for giving us an opportunity to coffient at this stage of this -develfpaeut. He hope you would give us the same chance on the Environmental. Impact Report review stage. Should there be fur..her need to discuss our comments in detail, please contact Mr. Hick T`nbao of our Engineering Section at (916) 322-7560, or Mr. Gerry yialho of our Concessions Office at (916) 445-9060. Sincerely yours, g l W. Cahi.l.l or G-6492A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 2i0TICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the City of Lake Elsinore Planting Commission on the 21st day of March, 1979, in the City Council Chambers, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, Colifornia, relative to the following: CONDIT.IOIQ,L USE APPLICATION-CUA--78-1 Property situated on the westerly side of Lakeshore Drive between Manning and Iona Streets. Applicants propose development of a recreational vehicle park. N(ITICE IS FURTPZR GIVEN that at said time and place, all interested parties_ are invited to attend said Public 'Hearing and be heard in favor of or opposition to said applications, either orally or by written commun;cation to the City-Planning Commission. For further particulars, all interested persons are invitea to call at the office !�•f the Secretary cf the Planning Commission, where information regarding this matter is on file. Date: February b, 1978 s/ Helen School-craft Secretary Publish: February 8, 19i8 Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Crtfl� 0 .L..�cCtC G�SIft638 COUNCILMEN: " . ! FRANK L.rAPASOUALE,Mtty, 4 CITY HALL WME TORN,Mww ho Tap 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET EUGENE J.CARTER LAKE ELSINORE.CALIFORNIA 92330 NAP HARRIS FR£O W.CROWE •�„ Te:ephone 1714)67d•3t25 ,— FLORENE MARSHE City C CHARLES R.µORG City Tre" JOHN DELSRUEC City M,n, H.M- DOUGHER City Attor 003.12 To: John E. Delbruegge - City Manager Fran: Joseph K.icak - City Engineer Date:, February 6, 1978 Re: Conditional Use of Application 78-1 Following are the engineering department recommendations as conditions of approval for the proposed R-V park. 1. Lakeshore Drive (a) Dedicate to provide for 50-foot hall street. (b) Install curb and gutter 38 feet from street centerline. (c) COgstruct standard roadway between new curb and street \\ centerline. r. Lehr Drive (a) Dedicate to provide for 60 feet of right-of-way. (b) Install curbs and gutters 44 feet from street centerline. (c) Install standard roadway between new curbs. 3. Interior Streets (a) Comply with the requirements of Chapter 15.44 of the City of Lake Elsinore Munic'.pal Code. - 4. Instill standard sidewalks on public streets. 5. Provide adequate drainage facilities. 6. Pay the capital improvement fund fees in accordance with Ordinance 572 and Resolution 77-39. 7. Install sanitary sewer system t3 serve the property. It should be pointed out that a large quantity of flow is anticipated from this proposed development. It is requested that the developer provide the City with a schedule for completing the development as proposed. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE John E. Delbruegge - City Manager Fabruary 5, 1978 8. Install standard"street lights. 9. Provide the City with a letter from Elsinore Water District indicating their capability. and willingness to serve the - proposed project. 10. All improvements to be designed by owner's Civil -Engineer to the specifications of the City. r JY uW )- ..++ M t/ o. z W y� Q tr ca � rW ` w a y a 1 w O OjGus m A 7 �.+.W Z&6 'C3 W 0 ,,1 C w0 N 0 >� A H U Q Q+ tp 41 A H k � y � 0 - O O ..4 � p 5 a E4 ; o � U U V $ ... ,S E+ k $4 fJ yy O O } rn54 I A m ...+ a as Q ay \ 'ice n U H U � N fl N � to > j0,, w a� c m p *o H u o o ,., o 1' < 0 m ?C m 11 04 �- CV U s w }i O 9 x "4 � u N w O Wa $� Z a V .4 0) go •n oo r Z►- ` 4 w fl .a wO ES N>. �+3' H1 u4 ri a ,O a) a) uU r oo 'uo ai O Yf w ;n a i.. O v., •U � w1 N ¢'� wN V w m H; vet 3 p p U �,, x to •�.� }+ ' �l �►�-O, wO Ou H aP' a� m OO toG -A w O W 2 - H a -4H g.4mo > O }U w E4 +d H A 1 km 4 m� oo m u � ,U b4)V A,m Uat) S F H1 U H O U N cn d' aQ U a R1 I I 4 z; x xt 1 ' - .:• � it [+ x a Description: A portion of Block 13 through lb inclusive; a portion of Block 18; Blocks 19 through 22 inclusive and r,ot 1 and Lot J :of Block 11 all of the Lakeshore Drive adfition as shown by map on file in RB 9/65-67 Records Of Riverside County,, California. c m � 1 H oV 1 v c -A.o a td .O K 41asa.c ,, om o 0. H Fzi 0 rn x y � W d .-mi -� to m x oz +: w W 0A � 'L' 'i U 11 U 14 C � U 4 J � '0 O O C4 S2i �� Rf 0 P. ZE4HO � W tU � � O O C � O � y c S} � J� �� .0 x w U Z x 3 A tG .-1 O -r1 O O e m 'a •e IV ii .i U C 11 m > Qj do' i -rl n L7 � ao ° ppOHzE A O va c �oosa w + w > z A to a ` saUG o a o w a � � � w ` 4) 0 14 �' °1-4 c m ra sa H oN c a2a o^ P4 U1 2 1 41 0 11 O V 0 ma r_ a 5= e 0 c z o 3 > va ;J Uam a � o Ems,+ q 114 v JU OQ QC w 4 H u a o a w O m 0 ;c w NQ ' to Gwc O u O Q? to X0 J H to E-4 ::) kD 43 V 4 O 'C r i G1 `t3 CT' 2 W t1 U U N ,-{ W •.i 'O C ?' 0 0 14 •� CS f C E� 04HOt_4 En Ay •o „ _ O .,C.� N w N aa.. Ri W'$ ~ O m -it > k A � U V to � O -Ui �. N �R! � ,-Ht 7�fa $4 w P. x H C`U� •H3iz.v;2� .+faO:s,xAa �ggH w�- c. E fH tU � '0 O O O U� �� a a 4 EH H J -. lu d -r•, ' 0�v ca �C: toJ p U N +► Ho . as 3 O a o 43 t`4 m w �•rc3i, .4 r x Ca , 4jO �—is N $4 O -4 •+ a s 4) v x >, vOa U, C �O O Ey x Q; o 4J 04) (a 43 1 43 4 C E o Caz E+ n-7 � v U v o Qf Fa o vw0O ra r ov 14 to a � o a1a �W E+ z E4 H X.0 E 9 to O 1 O o -1 c . $ to arnE� s w aR. � 09 r1 � o .i >; �' 11 O$J a i o 4.sU � U w a UJ x .3 w a: . .1 k 0 tV •, , ao > nR � O � o>~ > 'sro r3 o v O tr 4J tP O .a ato cn w A E+ r i. W u Z - 3 � ra 41 C!IaaO U .1up Ax O w t O s y °4 A * Cof c +s z u o a � r-t f 1-1 � ri 3 r' i O r -.t oOwwNE4iC) E O' W W c m 9 go Im m >,.0 U � p 0 % p1 m O -•i to 7 EH+ G. Z W Z O .-1 S I Rf $ tp Fs l H r1 $4 U tU .-1 Jam+ C © C7 z `� z O O N o 14 o 3 z H n CL O ZI 3 id u 4 U to .0 Oa -•,'+ z .-t Jta3EaaN0 ~ v a3i v v a m as o k �q to > u rya' o Al A A a v 1 >� zs to a o w m .o, a rzd ro v v c �+ ° coi Q M o � aa3 •zsaaw *+ m � A m m m m k �., a. ss a �- to 0 :3 v a Q cz C3 a C H n41 H •rl F{ C .� O V to 41 Now 0,1 44 -' O, 'Q m sa 41 0) i � a v ram , >� G �� Iro o ° 4.3 k '� aim '- '� -,+ 411 v p c `' a i 41 a+ c �,� �r+ boo - u > 4sc O ., .� m C yMi ! �� O Q is 4r. i cy 1 0 -01 > O C. .4 � >.i � J a, s. s a0 .i U m � cw + 0 � O a y s i O ty, a +y v v `{ 'Q yT. ri 4C qy b ;` ,��� i .-at V ru U ' G + zs U ri 0. •i tt O O ,Ee Q do14 i a QH � fl ac 3 o0p W Ee ri ►i t! m a � ^� �+ cli 1-4 m w om Cc: moo+ ® g a a x : p> .i 41 .� �' C 4 A 0 U E O j 0 a�i p b'� `� � � 1 c .41 U j O cOi m y w A a '!J U a ti a4 p , fl. O Q O. 6 C V O ` o .�, O a `4 �' a v cn 41 G Q rn 41 4 4 .s G C1 to � 9 m a i a G -H 1-4 .J O ..� t vZLl a O M a s q • '� o y C V U w S a w as U E- ; = p a u oCP m � ` d a a V1 V M is 4 r w V t Q 4-3 106 Q) o C SJ W > c 0CL m -rq isqp~t f .0 Sr iz a ti r 7 dE O A � 1. o u 1 s •o tT c ,a O: $4 O �Q, a f oo -11 � DO+ O s+ m A � s' � epm J c @ e, C•"' �, O >, 3 `o m u '� i�i p y$' 4.w .gyp u N.v z3 1 V +J nJ 47 a w ,°c U L A.: C; 1 4 Qf r 1 It c O Q 0 I x u c i a°i -.4 -4 a I I j9 -4 0 ` � G 0 �1 GO 4J c U -4 w � -A � i 3 c O > x � �$ -tea ."{ �d I ! d ­4 +asp'cE 41 k -C X 34 O ski -i I -Q +' w t C) -4 30.0 O•:i > D O. s0 .1 Qa c ° o G C; .0 c u 93 to ® EE y W a.J iy I .3 a • ,� � 8 w 9 „ 0A C: c y 3 4 j ` 71 3 m s � � '� w 0 o m � .ct �f a crtj � � ° a�c° o ° � isA w -Wp 1n � -0 -If w �� �d � � d Ck �E w -.1 L E + ca C _H O m +' ¢+ H a+ f a 14 a+ k, 4J O 41 t U f ° d C I U .t V{ r0 W E+ s.► : ,4 c w +i = ­4S� U III o ' � u .-+ a ° a .� w yl sC ' a+= -4 � r-i r- W LL•� a � � 41 1 tr a Ft >. fn b 14 M *4 ° - W 'Q C ri z at 4J r+ 4.) 4 V' o m •0 4j a o ° cam - - > .�'e �� ems, d C {t O` ',��1j �►l W f 3' U 41 a 'a ! O . y U ' I ^O+ f C t�1 m C t4 ] eG y "� 4jl n .1 1 o 1 O0 c. tl p e O U C I 1 w 0 '{ i s 'O U a a R, Q.to �r1i1 m 1 1 p I O a� to 0 G` . 04 � O ems► 3 t fy i 1 - a �' U 3 fu t m gic a+ ' I u c O � a• J E 0 �qIf 4 cY Cp ;c I ••i C G V ­4 I41 ,Ti s [ a1� Ile ML < r3 ^4 N tl Hid► W J k - o � � w : ! :a , f O s4 41 # a+ 3 E O t2 r k' • o c � ' ! r ti � c "' Y ' 41 t1 rt ! r t I �. � 0 C R 1. S 1 i �. 411 N41 CT J i .Ni C R3 i ce , 4-1 a3 9 I rD I S. p C m ( 1 ' C 0 Y y m L ram* i 3 .-1! _i .`�i .,Ot >.ii C 9 ; ( { i i i t 1C E } j .1./!� V � C J -rr •• U) d 1• f ( ! !� i �CL Q ^�. 41 34 4J -I ' -.•�+_ 1 sa S] X $4 U! .4i O O •.i p ! t 1 i C X C C � •ri > 0 s1 . . r � � at -00 c c, o c o � ; r7 C O -4 C M -ft CJ. ' 11 ' t O .� 1 i ; V "a -f j v C C'+ CL v ! l . i � 41 ci V 5 q i 41 r . O O 'c pC M C c K .s Oa 41, U • i r-! w = .0 Of E'4 $4 u to t '14 r+ f{ O > Ai 1 '� t~ :�" •1 O 1 U y w [~1 LT l i i V V C] �, •C+ G a C1 u O U 1 ( U t 0 --� ts+ d kl o i r f` w 4 4 .,., 4-4 a.-1 to ran Or 41 I i f 1 i as �. o Q04 k { 'C, a3 z t z a+is c t: ++c t 5i t Q3 3.-1 ! O ID %O C U � � j ! ! ( � j 'C M •-Ci ai p C!:�14 3 � . .O y-d U c C 1~ O ' St! >i 4 31 -a) tN o " .c 0 3 G 0 nl �' fi; 1 34 O ! O O C v U G � � � t � ( � 'O Q m � k ro c 1 Of j Ri O ' zti ! s c1 4J o O• w < rV y t( Q LL E G p 7 i ; .� y PC i rq 1 .0 t Q W -CC = '13 'C 1 1 i `� s 1 .-� O C 1 a y � Wf N1 r+ +� Aj-to U Ur f1. U33• c t ! I t ! 4J16go iim q/ ,q a Aj ed _ l WO rd n 1+ +I ro Lf c r ( I C y s+ U C' .C+.r 7 ij ! Inc 4 LAKESHORE DRIVE R rPZATIONAL VEHICLE PARK STATISTICAL INFORMATION SHEET I. Preliminary Development Summary A. Total number of RV spaces ,627 spaces B. Gross area 41.3 acres C. Composite and development propor- tions: 1. Green belt/landscaping 2. 2 acres (5. 3%) 2. Recreational. allotment/amenities 5.4 acres (13.2%) 3. Service related amenities 13.9 acres (33.7%) Camping space or lot area 19.8 acres (47.9%) D. Density: 1. Gross 15.2 acre II. Area Summary A. Green Beltf'landscaping sites 1. Perimeter buffer & slope area 1. 3 acres 2. Visual effect landscaped area .87 acres B. Recreational allotments/amenities 1. Recreation building site . 84 acres 2. Auxiliary area r .10. acres a. Boat launch office b. Satellite restroorrs (4) C. Manager's mobile home 3. Beach activity area 2.2 acres 4. Froject water area (to 1240 contour) 1.7 acres 5. Mini-park/walkways & tot lot areas . 6 acres C. Service related amenities 1. Recreational Vehicle Storage (63 spaces) 1. 3 acres 2. Boat launch manuever area (38 spaces) 1.0 acres 3. Car & boat trailer holding area (33 spaces) 1. 1 acres 4. Auxiliary parking 48 spaces 5. Interior access roads 9. 4 acres 6. Public: streets 1. 1 acres D. Space allotments 1. Adult section. (19 pull-thru) 221 spaces 2. Family section (72 pall-thru) 406 spaces E. Space sizes: 30'-35' width x 40'-50' depth Pull-thru spaces: 18'-24' width x 52'-651 depth NESTE!SRUDIN &S T ONIE INCORPORA-zo P.O. Box 8S1 • S3S EAST FLO&03:AVENLIE • HEMET • CALIFORNIA 92343 • H72-051.002 "LE11HONE(714)6S3di16 . January 26, 1978 City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main St. Lake Elsinore CA 92330 JACK DELBRUEGGE, CITY MANAGER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) FOR PROP).ir:D LAKESHORE DRIW R.V. PARK Tr- nsmi cted with this t atter for I.,le above referenced project are the following items 1• Application for Conditional Use Permit, 2• Twenty five copies of. Conaitional Use Permit Plot Plan, 3• Statist?.cal Information Sheet, 4. Filing fee of $125.00, 5. Completed Environmental Assessment form. Please advise us of the schedule for this project to be con- sidered by tl' Planning COInml.ssion and the City Council. Vie only permanently occupied buildings are the Proposed re- creation building and the manager's mobile home. these structures are Both of e be on graded pads above the 1265 contour planned t P as required by the 'City and the County Health Department. Also a sewer pump sta-6. ioii is proposed in the lower part of the project site. This pump station, will be designed to collect a.LJ the waste water and will discharge through L sewer force main to .the City's existing sewer line , in Lakeshore Drive. The pump station will also be designed to be flood proofed from storm water and high lake levels. it is our understanding this property wds included and assess- ed for the sewer on Lakeshore Drive insitzlled previou,.;ly by the City by an Assess-,rent District. �� OFFICES IN; SAN WHAWINO •.HMff SAN DIFtaO City of Lake Llsinore January 26, 1978 Page Two Fror; our previous discussions with 'and staff, it was not clear what fees for Streets, Parks and Stor�i Drain Capital Improvement Funds would be re enacted Ordinance No. 572 enQui`ed under your recently d Resoluti_cn No 77_39. Ordinance and Resolution does not directly relate to oris nx-ntion fees for Recreational it does a it (RV) lots. However, ppear that the intent was to collect fees based upon the net lot area. The area occupied by the RV's in this project total app.ToxiMtely 19.8 acres and the build- ing areas total approximately 0.94 acres for a total area Of approximately 20.74 acres. Therefore it would seam :,:eA- sonable to use 20. 74 acres in computing the fees for-the Street, Park and Storm Drain Capital ImprovemEint Funds (per Sections 3, 4 and, 5 of Resoluti-3n No. 77-39) . In addit .on to the above, additional fees F,re also required f or Sewer and Water Improvement_. Funds (per Sectirn 1 and 2) which relate to each residential unit or to plumbing fixture units. To our knowledge there is -no Standard Measure in the Plumbing Codes for plumbing fixture units for RV's.-area proposed to be developed for RV's were developedlin oe City minimim site lots of 6,000 s.f. this would be equiva- lent to approximately 143 residential lots 4-1/2 RV's/residential Sot. for approximately ) . This could be used as a basis of determining these fees. Another comparison ur this fee determination could be done by comparing wafer consumption and waste water disposal. C. W. Erickson, owner/partner, of a 1041 space RV park West of Hemet (Golden Village) advised us that their actual water use over the last several years averaged State Codes and Stanr�;ards Division is presently gallons/person/day. The 25 (the State Administration Code concerningpa revising Title grounds) to account for a lower water consumption and camp- grounds) rate for RV's. Using 30 gallons/person/day and estimating 100$ occupancy (although the actual average occupancy is estimated at 62%) with 2 persons/space in the adult section and 4 persons/space in ;.he family section, the total water use would be approxi- mately 37,600 gallons/day. The waste water disposal would be approximately 80% of tr.is use or approximately day. If the same area were developed into 143 residentialons/ i City of Lake Elsinore January 26, 1978 Page Three 'its, using a wast, -`ztEr s;4 p e5 L.�matinq 2--1.�2 persons/residence? of 100/gallons/cap/day and would be approximates the waste water disposal more than for an RV' Park5' 750 gallons/day or approximate) . y 20$ I trust the above info deternininr what the Citation wi11Tprovide you so me No. 77- Y fees will be n basis of 39 and ordinance No. 372. ursuant to Resolution rather scustantial and could affect2. Sinc these City fees are Project feasibility, an estimate of s.11ch fees. quest that you provide us witI, MER„!7'G.' C l Project Mana � ger '! bsv V enclosures Lehr, Siavick & Bonebrake, ``'-'Pjicants and owners w /enclosures ° 4 .tom •y ! � �1•�L'r • � + ,�` � �- �' •�� (,�: �''�� /�,�.''y ':•.sue �•M ��','yr� .`� .r?r � - •• irk 4 "' -•• it ..... . - .. .- - 1. f` e 1 _ E ED 1 i i •'q Lak • E&I n. . , ode : . :.� .. .. a. _• .. "dune 1S6.Ig78 .. C-46 i)Rv . a r PDrOve . '616" um rk. Pa- , A corners The Lake Elsinore City Council request a boat launch gave tentative approval•to the 616 the state. Permit from hearing on the issue. unit recreational-vehicle However.issuance of the Planned for the area off Lae park state permit is not contingent upon t� one spoke in opposition to `)rive in the Four whore the conditional use permit. park June 12 � area The applicants were also The Park is bein la � reQuested 20 dedicate and improve g P rtn2d by real wit,i county flood control estate broker 0ma Slavik, Pete assistance if necessary: a flood Lehr and Howard Bonebrake, control channel across the The city staff recommended that properly, among other things park_planners Capital im must: provement fund fees "submit.to the a win be assessed as follows. circulation plan per space for SE ,Fr three_ —Arepare and submit a cents Per square foot f", 4# strclet to pr ePa view of lake; � tund,one cent per square foot'or _ the Park fund and two c�.nts landscaping plan;a proFosed sq re foot for the stcrm dram —submit specific Plans for Total revenue expected for the sewer.water and electrical to capital funds would be more than : y the count Health, $100.000. Department, state The 616 number of �Pa�xnt of Parks and, reduced from t soriginally Recreation and'the city - he Proposed 627 spaces, Also.the city would requira that The park Pianners also agreed to during the Park's operation,length the council request that the e of residence in park be limited to Lehr Street which runs along the six months; no children in park be property. enro:Ied in Elsinore publ r schools Charles Erickson, "salesman" MCI the park maintain a dumpfor the station for sewage that is to Park, �?� he'was happy dumped from RV holdin t be with the coul;dl s handling of the Any violation of the cond conditions session issueks. park in the previous study would_he cause for revocation of "I've never been so plea (I with th.e r«Y Tonal use permit the input of the council in the study aners were also-asked to session."he said during the public