The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About0003_5_PA 2021-18 - Exhibit D Draft 6th Cycle Housing Element Appendices2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT H - 1 2021-2029 housing element HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX lake elsinore general plan City o f Lake Elsinore Revised (3rd Revision) HCD Review Draft July 29, 2022 City of Lake Elsinore, California 2021 to 2029 Housing Element APPENDICES Prepared by MIG and the City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division Table of Contents APPENDIX A. PUBLIC OUTREACH APPENDIX B. SITES INVENTORY APPENDIX C. SPECIFIC PLAN SITES LAND USE DIAGRAMS This page left intentionally blank. APPENDIX A Public Outreach This page left intentionally blank TAKE OUR ONLINE HOUSING SURVEY Tell us what you think about the future of housing in Lake Elsinore by taking our online survey available in English and Spanish. ATTEND OUR VIRTUAL WEBINAR ON JUNE 17 AT 6 P.M. The City is hosting a "Let's Talk Housing, Lake Elsinore" webinar to discuss the purpose of the Housing Element 2021 Update. Join us to learn more about this process and the community's role. The webinar will be conducted via Zoom from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. You must register to attend in advance. SIGN UP FOR EMAIL UPDATES Sign up to receive email updates about our efforts to update our Housing Element. The process is expected to last until October 2021 and the City will be seeking feedback from the community on a draft design. The City of Lake Elsinore is updating its Housing Element. The Housing Element is one of nine state-mandated elements of the City’s General Plan . It provides goals, polices, and actions that help the City plan for existing and future housing needs for all segments of the population and expresses community goals about housing in Lake Elsinore. The updated Housing Element will cover an eight-year planning period from 2021 through 2029. The City is expected to finalize the plan by October 2021. HOW TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CITY'S HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE 2021 Find out more at www.lake-elsinore.org/housing. City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Workshop Stakeholder List Type Name Contact Position Email Phone Address Stakeholder Type Non-Profit Organization Rotary Club of Lake Elsinore Jamie Schramm President jamie.lerotary@gmail.com 562-881-4267 PO Box 521, Lake Elsinore, CA, 92531 Various Non-Profit Organization Elsinore Woman's Club Pat Miller Programs elsinorewomansclub@yahoo.com 951-285-8856 710 West Graham Ave. Women, Families Non-Profit Organization American Legion Post 200 Bill Sauter Commander miapow@verizon.net 951-678-7777 18871 Grand Ave.Veterans Non-Profit Organization VFW - Wildomar Steve Regalado Post Commander vfwpost1508@gmail.com 951-674-4735 Post 1508, 21180 Waite St Wildomar CA 92595 Veterans Non-Profit Organization Lake Elsinore Historical Society Ruth Atkins jaratkin@verizon.net 951-678-0084 183 North Main St Various Non-Profit Organization Lake Elsinore Marine Search & Rescue (LEMSAR)Pete Dawson Member peterdawson@verizon.net 951-202-1584 Non-Profit Organization Lake Elsinore Valley Education Foundation Kevin Pape Chairman kwpape@aol.com 951-609-7525 914 Dolly Drive, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530-7200 Youth education support Non-Profit Organization Studio 395 Grace Sandlin Advisory Board Member info@Studio395.org 951-471-4407 16275 Grand Ave, Lake Elsinore (Community Center) Arts programming, youth Non-Profit Organization Dream Center & HOPE Matthew Dobler matthew@dreamcenterle.org 951-775-2176 The Dream Center of Lake Elsinore, 114 East Peck Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Family assistance, counseling services Non-Profit Organization Assistance League Electra Demos jimnlec@verizon.net 951-694-8018 28720 Via Montezuma, Temecula, CA, 92590 Youth support services Non-Profit Organization Social Work Action Group & The Anchor Ashlee DiPhillippo Donor Coordinator ashleerene@msn.com 562-577-6686 215 W. Graham Ave., Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Crisis stabilization housing for homeless (City of LE) Non-Profit Organization Trauma Intervention Prevention Program Magda Stewart magdaoftipswrc@gmail.com 951-609-5068 PO Box 585, Murrieta, CA 92564 Emergency counseling services Non-Profit Organization Boys and Girls Club Carly Bennett-Valle Interim CEO/CFO carlyv@bgcswc.org 951-699-1526 P.O. Box 892349, Temecula, CA, 92589 Youth Non-Profit Organization Animal Friends of the Valleys Beth Soltysiak Donor Development Beth@animalfriendsofthevalleys.com 951-805-6239 33751 Mission Trail, Wildomar, CA 92595 Animal services Non-Profit Organization Vista Community Clinic Betsy Heightman Chief Development Officer betsy@vcc.clinic 760-631-5000 30195 Fraser Drive Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Family health and emergency support services Non-Profit Organization United Way of the Inland Valleys Jennifer Thornton Program Manager, GEMS & Alllocationsjthornton@uwiv.org 951-697-5902 9624 Hermosa Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Youth, families Non-Profit Organization Encouragers Counseling and Training Centers Vicki Coffman Founder, Marriage and Family TherapistVicki@EncouragersUSA.com 951-900-4414 29970 Technology Dr., Suite #108 & 109, Murrieta, CA 92563 Family and community counseling services Non-Profit Organization Operation Safe House Luis Lopez info@operationsafehouse.org 951-351-4418 9685 Hayes St, Riverside, CA, 92503 Homeless youth Non-Profit Organization California Family Life Center-Planet Youth Mary Jo Ramirez Executive Director mjramirez@cflckids.org 951-765-9671 P.O. Box 727, Hemet, CA 92546-0727 Homeless youth Non-Profit Organization Riverside Recovery Resources Desmond Young Director of Recovery Operations dyoung@riversiderecovery.org 951-674-5354 600 Third Street, Suite C, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Family and community counseling services Non-Profit Organization Inspire Life Skills Krista Langford Resource Developer klangford@inspirelifeskills.org 951-314-2238 2279 Eagle Glen Pkwy. #112 PMB #131 Corona, CA 92883 Foster, formerly homeless youth Non-Profit Organization United States Veterans Initiative-Inland Empire Nicole Starks-Murray Executive Director 951-656-6893 15305 6th Street, March Air Reserve Base, CA 92518 Veterans Non-Profit Organization Village on Grand Community Center villageongrand@studio395.org 951-471-4407 16275 Grand Ave, Lake Elsinore , CA, 92530 Seniors Non-Profit Organization Lutheran Social Services Deniece Marshall Area Director rcinfo@LSSSC.org 951-689-7847 4162 Rubidoux Avenue, Riverside, CA 92506 Families Non-Profit Organization Catholic Charities - Murrieta 951-691-8203 39429 Los Alamos Rd, Murrieta, CA 92563 Family assistance, counseling services Non-Profit Organization Wildomar Senior Center Dawn Brennan Community Liaison & Admissions Coordinator 951-678-1555 32325 S Pasadena St, Wildomar, CA 92595 Seniors Non-Profit Organization H.O.P.E. Pantry Program (Dream Center)HopeOffice@DreamCenterLE.org 951-245-7510 506 Minthorn Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Family emergency assistance Non-Profit Organization Victor Community Support Services Simona Cataldo CEO 951-674-9243 265 San Jacinto River Rd Suite 107, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Youth and family counseling services Non-Profit Organization Habitat for Humanity-Inland Valley Tammy Marine Executive Director tammy@habitativ.org 951-296-3362 27475 YNEZ ROAD, #390, TEMECULA, CA 92591 Affordable housing Non-Profit Organization Together Freedom (FACESS)connect@togetherfreedom.org 951-399-3332 31500 Grape St., PMB 242, Lake Elsinore, CA 92532 Youth counseling and support services Non-Profit Organization Restoring Hope Community Services awjackson6567@gmail.com 951-990-2519 P.O. Box 205, Perris, CA 92570 Veterans, homeless services Non-Profit Organization Angel View Patti Park Executive Director 760-329-6471 67625 E. Palm Canyon Drive, Suite 7A, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Children, adults with disabilities Non-Profit Organization Community Access Network 951-471-1426 600 Central Ave., Ste. E, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Children and families, social services, foster youth Non-Profit Organization Lake Elsinore Teachers Association Mario Mantano President 951-245-0446 31762 Mission Trail Suite M, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Education Non-Profit Organization EPOCH Center 951-657-4882 371 Wilkerson Ave., Ste. L, Perris, CA, 92570 Youth education support, persons with disabilities Faith-Based Organization Adonai Ministries Beau Arbornuat - Pastor AdonaiMinistriesLE@gmail.com Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Aletheia Christian Fellowship 951-757-1801 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Bread of Life Church 951-245-0124 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Calvary Chapel Bear Creek 951-678-1054 Wildomar Various Faith-Based Organization Cantrell Community Unity / Ministry Dave Cantrell dncministry@yahoo.com 702-408-7897 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Canyon Lake Community Church Canyon Lake Various Faith-Based Organization Centerpoint Church 951-696-1002 Murrieta Various Faith-Based Organization Church on the REAL Jason Welsh pastorjason@churchonthereal.org 951-226-5061 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Circle of Care Ministries Terri Keim terri@circleofcareministries.org 951-973-3582 Temecula Various Faith-Based Organization Cornerstone Community Church 951-674-8661 Wildomar Various Faith-Based Organization Corona Norco Rescue Mission jim@rescuemission.org 951-526-1200 Corona/Norco Various Faith-Based Organization Dream Center Dave Snow (youth dir.)Dave@dreamcenterle.org 951-264-1723 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Elsinore First Assembly 951-678-1757 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Encouragement Church readyec@gmail.com (951) 821-6270 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Faith Baptist Church 951-245-8744 Wildomar Various Faith-Based Organization Faith Bible Church (Ice Cream Truck Church)Zulma 951-200-3173 Wildomar Various Faith-Based Organization Fellowship Corona (Horsethief Canyon)Mel Cambell Corona Various Faith-Based Organization First Presbyterian Church (Mtn View Church)951-674-6372 Wildomar Various Faith-Based Organization Fishes & Loaves 951-376-3703 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Grace and Truth Worship Ministry Willie Oliver - Pastor urimportantfoundation@gmail.com Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Gracepoint Church of the Nazarene Amanda Domenquiz 951-466-8603 Wildomar Various Faith-Based Organization Hacienda House info@hislightonthehill.com 951-657-3041 Perris Various Faith-Based Organization Iglesia Crisstiana Brazos Eternos 951-445-0317 Wildomar Various Faith-Based Organization In The Light Ministries 951-965-5136 Wildomar Various Faith-Based Organization Independent Church of Lake Elsinore (Baptist)951-674-3632 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization La Ultima Llamada Iglesia Cristiana 951-275-6823 Wildomar Various City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Workshop Stakeholder List Type Name Contact Position Email Phone Address Stakeholder Type Faith-Based Organization Lake Elsinore Baptist Church 951-674-9350 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Lake Elsinore Calvary Chapel 951-674-5451 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Lake Elsinore Church of Christ 951-674-5914 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Lake Providence Baptist Church 951-674-4311 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Lakeview Chapel Michael Ghoslin lakeviewchapel7@verizon.net 951-674-2825 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Lambs Fellowship lfleoffice@gmail.com Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Lambs Fellowship Lake Elsinore 951-471-3807 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Leave No Women Behind Kymberli Boynton 951.775.6487 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Living Hope Lutheran Church 951-805-1353 Wildomar Various Faith-Based Organization MNE Church Carina foreverebenezer@hotmail.com 949-350-3095 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Mountainside Ministries 951-678-9402 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization New Hope Baptist Church 951-674-8053 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization New Song Calvary Chapel Cherie cherie@mynewsongcc.com Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization New Song Christian Community 951-245-5664 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Nineveh Ministries Debra Pollard debrapollard10@gmail.com 951-200-9759 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Oakstone Community Church 951-678-9000 Wildomar Various Faith-Based Organization One Salvation Church Jose Martinez josemartinez421@gmail.com 951-297-0418 Various Faith-Based Organization Our Redeemer Lives Church 951-245-0522 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Rhema World Ministries Marcus Robinson mrobinsonmdr@hotmail.com 951-837-6609 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization River View Christian Academy (RVCA)Jill Sackinger connect@teenrescue.com 800-494-2200 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Rock Church/Raw Church/7th Day Baptist Barry Oskey wfcusc56@gmail.com 951-490-6787 Various Faith-Based Organization Solid Rock Church International 951-735-4647 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization St. Andrews Episcopal Church 951-674-4087 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization St. Frances of Rome Sylvia 951-674-6881 Wildomar Various Faith-Based Organization Teen Challenge of Southern CA paulette.nagle@teenchallenge.org 951-682-8990 Riverside Various Faith-Based Organization The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints - L.E.Stake Ashlee DePhillippo ashleephotos@gmail.com 562-577-6686 Lake Elsinore/Wildomar Various Faith-Based Organization The House of God James Salter - Pastor Salterj11@gmail.com 951-956-1828 Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization Work for the Glory of God Hector Calderon Hector.calderon@workforthegloryofgod.com Lake Elsinore Various Faith-Based Organization World Harvest Church (Dufresne Ministries)951-696-9258 Wildomar Various Faith-Based Organization Calvery Chapel LE https://www.calvaryle.org Lake Elsinore Various City Government City Council members Various City Council members Various Various Lake Elsinore Various City Government Planning Commission members Various Planning Commission members Various Various Lake Elsinore Various City Government Public Safety Advisory Commission members Various Public Safety Advisory Commission membersVarious Various Lake Elsinore Various City Government Measure Z Citizen Committee Members Various Measure Z Citizen Committee MembersVarious Various Lake Elsinore Various City Government Lake Elsinore Unified School District Denine Diaz Lake Elsinore Unified School District (951) 253-7000x5386Lake Elsinore Families, Youth Homeowner Associations Alberhill Ranch HOA Jennifer Alegria Manager (Keystone Pacific) jalegria@keystonepacific.com 949-833-2600 Lake Elsinore Home Owners Homeowner Associations Vista Del Lago HOA Sherry Neal Manager (Walters Management) sneal@waltersmanagement.com 951-698-8511 Lake Elsinore Home Owners Homeowner Associations Tuscany Hills HOA Jenny Bonnar Manager (Keystone Pacific)jbonnar@keystonepacific.com 951-245-9102 Lake Elsinore Home Owners Homeowner Associations Summerly HOA Deanna Casillas Manager (First Service Residential)deanna.casillas@fsresidential.com Lake Elsinore Home Owners Homeowner Associations Canyon Hills HOA Kelley Aranda Manager (Action Property Management) karanda@actionlife.com 951-699-7656 Lake Elsinore Home Owners Homeowner Associations Canyon Hills HOA Jordan Large Manager Assistant jlarge@actionlife.com Lake Elsinore Home Owners Homeowner Associations Canyon Hills HOA/Westridge HOA Scott Sears Manager (Action Property Management) ssears@actionlife.com 949-450-0202 Lake Elsinore Home Owners Homeowner Associations Elsinore Terrace HOA gprivitt@keystonepacific.com 949-838-3236 Lake Elsinore Home Owners Homeowner Associations Rosetta Canyon HOA Lana Hamadej Manager (Avalon Management)lana@avalonweb.com 951-244-0520 Lake Elsinore Home Owners Homeowner Associations Shore Pointe HOA Robert Supalla Manager (Equity Management) rsupalla@equitymgt.com 951-296-5640 Lake Elsinore Home Owners Homeowner Associations Viscaya Homeowners Association Krystal Cervantes Manager (Compass Property Management) Krystal@compasspropertymanagement.com 949-429-3708 Lake Elsinore Home Owners Homeowner Associations Lido at Lakeshore Condo Community Stacy Serna Manager (Cannon Management) stacyserna@cannonmanagement.com 951-354-5365 Lake Elsinore Home Owners June 17, 2021 Comments/Questions iHousing ElEsenmllHsuetnCyWork hpAnDEUE klEse dvsnrE knvDDnrHousi encaga iLnlHdrndvsnerEnmuet DnenEsdHyviEnerE etkEn.nDEUE klEsenLE sEEDw mvsnLEnvDD iyEEsokvdEonvsD ouDELv WonenulkyUE vyEvonvsDnveeyvde DEUE klEsew SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS pyv.eniHousing ElEsenf?f20f?f1 Issues/Concerns -vDndvkvduetnorH D 9EnevWEsnuse dsouDEyveusnLuer sELnDEUE klEseo RvdveusnyEsev on0nu.nLE v LnsELnrHousinLE orH Dnv LnUvdveus yEsev o byvsW usnVeanuonv dsdEys Cu nHynodr on9E v9 Ene vddllDveEneruo etkEn.niyLerw cWnusenyEFHuyusi oWu EDSeyvusED LyW.ydEn.ynsEL DEUE klEsen0nHoEn dv v9y qUEydyLDusin0nsenv iDnuDEvnen9Hu DnHsueo usn9vdWtvyDon/hpAO( suoE)nov.Eet)n:,yEnuooHEo -vDndvkvduet dsdEysn0n Wnuse LuDEsusinbyvsW usnVea Recommendations muetnorH DnyEFHuyE erEnHoEn.n dv oWu EDn v9y glketn eonpLseLs( dsouDEynkyUuDusink vso .yn9Hu Dusione EsdHyviEnsEL DEUE klEse VEsuynrHousi sEEDo VEdsDnuseEydrvsiE enevWEnkyEooHyEn.. .n-vu yvDnmvsts City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Update | Community Survey Summary | 6/21/21 Lake Elsinore Housing Element Update 2021 Housing Element Survey Results Summary Prepared by: 537 S. Raymond Avenue Pasadena CA 91105 June 21, 2021 City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Update | Community Survey Summary | 6/21/21 2 Introduction: All California cities are required to adopt a General Plan. A General Plan establishes the framework for decision making in the community. As required by State law, the City of Lake Elsinore is updating one of its General Plan’s elements – Housing. The Housing Element identifies how Lake Elsinore can meet existing and future housing needs for all income levels of its population. Community input is critical to ensure community needs, values, and preferences are reflected in the Housing Element Update. Part of the Elements’ update is a community engagement component that will be used to inform the plan update process. The survey period ran from May 12, 2021 through the end of the day June 20, 2021. In total, 340 participants submitted surveys – 227 responded to all 21 questions, and 113 responded to one or more questions but not all 21. This Housing Element community survey solicited public input regarding housing issues facing Lake Elsinore and its residents. The survey responses and results are summarized below. The City’s website contains more information about the Housing Element updates and upcoming activities. https://www.lake-elsinore.org/housing Key Findings: Of those responding, 63.4% are homeowners and 75.3% live in a detached single-family home. 64.3% of respondents say they are satisfied with their current housing situation and 43.2% rated the physical condition of the dwelling they live in as excellent. Respondents say they chose to live in Lake Elsinore because of the cost of housing (63.9%), close distance to family and friends (26.4%), and the quality of housing (22.5%). For those who do not currently own a home the primary issue to finding a home is the ability to find a home in their target price range (33.9%). Over half of respondents noted that focusing new housing near downtown, creating walkable neighborhoods was a very important action for Lake Elsinore. City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Update | Community Survey Summary | 6/21/21 3 Responses: Housing: 1. Currently, do you… ● 55.1% Live in Lake Elsinore and work somewhere else ● 26.4% Live and work in Lake Elsinore ● 11.5% Live in Lake Elsinore and do not currently work or are retired ● 2.6% Do not live in Lake Elsinore ● 2.2% Did not answer ● 1.3% Own a business in Lake Elsinore ● 0.9% Work in Lake Elsinore and live somewhere else 2. How long have you lived in Lake Elsinore? ● 32.6% Said 1 to 5 years ● 23.4% Said 11 to 20 years ● 21.2% Said 21 or more years ● 16.3% Said 6 to 10 years ● 1.8% Did not answer ● 4.9% question did not apply 3. Which best describes your current living situation? ● 75.3% Live in a detached single-family home ● 7.5% Live in an apartment ● 4.0% Live in a mobile home ● 3.5% Said other ● 2.6% Live in a condominium/townhome ● 0.9% Live in a duplex/triplex/fourplex ● 0.9% Do not currently have a permanent home ● 0.5% Live in an accessory dwelling unit 4. Which best describes your current housing situation? ● 63.4% Own ● 23.4% Rent ● 5.3% Live with friends/family, do not own or pay rent ● 1.3% Said other ● 0.9% Do not currently have a permanent home City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Update | Community Survey Summary | 6/21/21 4 5. Are you satisfied with your current housing situation? ● 64.3% Said yes ● 25.1% Said no ● 5.7% Did not answer ● 4.9% N/A 6. How would you rate the physical condition of the dwelling you live in? ● 43.2% Said excellent ● 34.8% Said it shows signs of minor deferred maintenance (i.e., peeling paint, chipped stucco, etc.) ● 13.2% Said it needs one or more major upgrades (i.e., new plumbing, new electrical, new foundation, etc.) ● 3.1% Said other ● 0.9% Did not answer ● 4.9% N/A 7. Which of the following housing upgrades or expansions have you considered making to your home? ● 14.1% Said other ● 13.2% Said solar ● 11.0% Said HVAC (heating, ventilation, air conditioning) ● 4.9% Said room addition ● 4.0% Said roofing ● 3.1% Said Accessory Dwelling Unit/Granny Flat ● 9.7% Did not answer ● 40.1% Question did not apply 8. Which best describes your household type? ● 34.8% Said couple with children (younger than 18 years old) ● 17.6% Said couple ● 13.7% Said multi-generational household ● 10.6% Said single person household ● 5.7% Said single parent with children (younger than 18 years old) ● 5.3% Said young adult living with parents ● 4.0% Said other ● 2.2% Said single with roommates ● 1.3% Did not answer ● 4.9% N/A City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Update | Community Survey Summary | 6/21/21 5 9. What are your reasons for living in Lake Elsinore? Choose all that apply. ● 63.9% Said cost of housing ● 26.4% Said close distance to family and friends ● 22.5% Said quality of housing ● 18.1% Said distance from work ● 17.6% Said community and recreation amenities, like parks and recreation centers ● 17.6% Said safety of neighborhoods ● 13.2% Said other ● 13.2% Said destinations like the Lake, Outlets and Skydive Lake Elsinore ● 11.9% Said types of housing available ● 10.1% Said distance from home to shopping, restaurants, healthcare, or other services ● 8.4% Said range of housing choices ● 7.1% Said quality of schools ● 6.6% Said city services and programs ● 4.9% Did not answer 10. Do you think the range of housing options currently available meet your needs? ● 44.5% Said yes ● 38.3% Said no ● 9.7% did not answer ● 2.6% Didn’t know ● 4.9% N/A 11. Do you believe that the cost of housing in Lake Elsinore prevents children from being able to stay/own homes when they grow up? ● 44.1% Said yes ● 31.7% Said no ● 13.2% Didn’t know ● 6.2% did not answer ● 4.9% N/A 12. If you wish to own a home in Lake Elsinore but do not currently own one, what factors prevent you from owning a home? (Choose all that apply). ● 33.9% Said I cannot find a home in my target price range ● 18.1% Said I do not currently have the financial resources for an adequate monthly mortgage payment ● 13.2% Said other ● 6.2% Said I cannot find a home that suits my quality standards ● 6.2% Said I cannot find a home that suits my living needs (housing size, disability accommodations, etc.) ● 2.6% Said I do not currently wish to own a home here City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Update | Community Survey Summary | 6/21/21 6 13. What types of housing does Lake Elsinore need most? Respondents ranked their top choices in order of importance, with 1 being the most important. The most frequent responses are detached single-family homes, condominiums/townhomes, and larger lot, rural estate homes. All responses are shown in the table below. When the responses are weighted (12 points for a 1 response, 11 points for a 2 response, and so on…) detached single-family homes and condominiums/townhomes remain the most frequent responses. Housing Needs in Lake Elsinore 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total Points Detached single-family homes 1,368 385 70 36 32 7 12 0 0 3 4 0 1,917 Condominiums/townhomes 192 319 290 108 80 42 18 10 16 0 0 0 1,075 Larger lot, rural estate homes 312 286 220 126 40 14 18 5 4 12 12 3 1,052 Affordable or Workforce Housing 312 264 100 90 32 35 36 35 4 6 0 0 914 Senior housing 60 275 250 90 56 42 42 15 16 6 6 5 863 Duplexes or Triplexes (2- or 3- unit buildings) 24 132 120 63 88 49 36 30 16 18 4 0 580 Accessory dwelling units (granny flats or guest houses) 48 99 130 81 64 35 6 35 32 12 12 2 556 Housing for families and individuals who need supportive services like job training and social services 36 132 140 63 32 28 30 35 16 12 14 4 542 Larger scale apartment buildings (5 units or more) 36 143 80 63 48 77 30 25 16 6 6 5 535 Interim/transitional housing for people looking to transition from homelessness 36 99 120 72 48 21 18 25 16 24 10 6 495 Smaller scale apartment buildings (4 units or fewer) 12 44 110 45 56 70 36 10 28 9 6 1 427 Mobile home parks 12 11 40 0 32 28 24 20 12 18 8 14 219 City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Update | Community Survey Summary | 6/21/21 7 14. Rank the importance of potential housing actions in Lake Elsinore. Respondents were asked to indicate the important each potential housing action. Encouraging the rehabilitation of existing housing in older neighborhoods, establishing/supporting programs to help first-time homebuyers, and programs to help homeowners at risk of mortgage default were the top three housing actions identified as very important. Potential Housing Actions Very Important Somewhat Important Not Important Don’t Know No Answer Focus new housing near downtown, creating walkable neighborhoods. 114 68 33 5 7 Ensure that the housing market provides a diverse range of housing types (i.e., single-family homes, condominiums/apartments, townhomes, duplex/triplexes) to meet a variety of needs of local residents. 114 66 35 3 9 Streamline the process for new housing construction. 100 63 32 21 11 Support programs to help homeowners add accessory (second) units to their properties. 73 67 57 15 15 Establish housing for households with special needs such as seniors, large families, veterans, and/or persons with disabilities. 101 86 18 8 14 Provide shelters and transitional housing for homeless families and individuals, together along with services that help move people into permanent housing. 76 74 54 8 15 Encourage the rehabilitation of existing housing in older neighborhoods. 149 55 7 4 12 Establish/Support programs to help first-time homebuyers, including down payment or closing cost assistance programs. 142 51 24 2 8 Establish/Support programs to help homeowners at risk of mortgage default to keep their homes, including mortgage loan programs. 126 55 28 6 12 Support programs to help renters through programs like rental assistance programs and the creation of more affordable rental housing. 105 52 49 6 15 Targeted efforts to address long-term inequities in the housing market, including discrimination in renting. 118 35 44 9 21 Integrate affordable housing throughout the community. 103 49 48 4 23 City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Update | Community Survey Summary | 6/21/21 8 15. There are a number of approaches for deciding where to allow new housing in Lake Elsinore. Respondents ranked their top choices in order of importance, with 1 being the most important. The top response was that new housing should be located where it will have the least impact on traffic in Lake Elsinore. All responses are shown in the table below. When the responses are weighted (4 points for a 1 response, 3 points for a 2 response, and so on…) the top answer remained the same. Locations for Housing in Lake Elsinore 1 2 3 4 Total Points New housing should be located where it will have the least impact on traffic in Lake Elsinore 356 138 58 17 569 New housing should be spread evenly across all parts of the city 292 162 56 15 525 New housing should be concentrated near downtown, to create walkable neighborhoods 88 111 104 29 332 New housing should be located within easy access of shops and services 80 144 48*2 39 263 City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Update | Community Survey Summary | 6/21/21 9 About You: 16. How old are you? ● 58.2% Said 30 to 49 ● 20.3% Said 50 to 64 ● 15.4% Said 18 to 29 ● 5.3% Said 65 and older ● 0.9% did not answer 17. Which ZIP code do you reside in? ● 76.7% Said 92530 ● 17.6% Said 92532 ● 4.0% Said other ● 1.8% Did not answer 18. Which best describes your annual household income? ● 5.3% Said Under $24,999 ● 17.2% Said $25,000 - $49,999 ● 18.1% Said $50,000 - $74,999 ● 22.9% Said $75,000 - $99,999 ● 21.6% Said $100,000 - $149,999 ● 10.1% Said $150,000 or more ● 1.8% Said they prefer not to state ● 3.1% Did not answer 19. Check all that apply to you: ● 8.8% Are the owner of a business in Lake Elsinore ● 3.1% Are a developer of housing ● 1.3% Are a developer of commercial buildings ● 2.2% Said they use public transportation ● 56.0% Said they commute more than 10 miles to work ● 7.1% Are a housing advocate ● 4.9% Are a social service provider 20. What else would you like the City to consider when updating Lake Elsinore’s Housing Element? Respondents were asked to write in any additional information for the City to consider. In total 124 – or 54.6% - participants submitted a written comment. Comments can be found at the end of the document in the appendix section City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Update | Community Survey Summary | 6/21/21 10 Appendix Question 20 – Other Considerations for the Housing Element Written in comments • Traffic is getting progressively worst throughout the city, especially in the area near freeway and Diamond drive. • Reconsider your master plan. Put housing in central locations. • The grocery stores and parking lots need trees and beauty like Murrieta and Temecula. We also need high-end restaurant instead of cheap fast food, uplift our city. • Low income housing should be spread evenly around LE. Not just centered around downtown or east lake district. We need new schools in downtown and east lake district • Sandwiched between Corona to the north and Murrieta/Temecula to the south, Lake Elsinore has the most upward potential, and the longest way to go, to reach the quality of life and standard of living offered by those communities. That will only happen by attracting the right types of business and entrepreneurs, and that is where the city's focus should be. • I would much rather have senior housing than affordable housing. We work hard to keep our community safe • Getting the county of Riverside involved to improve Lakeland village side as well, make all of Elsinore desirable. • Have local police Dept and eliminate wait time when called. Develope lake street from 15 freeway Add nicer restaurants on banks of Lake. Enforce pet control, fine with leashes Add a Kaiser hospital • No more housing. The more housing we get the more traffic we have and I worry the city will stop having a small town feel. Just more people in a hurry wanting everything to look the same and perfect. • Keep the the historic & cultural downtown area and neighborhoods near Main Street & Graham from turning into Temecula or Murrieta. We have a great vibe and relatively "safe" atmosphere but we're unique and don't need big houses or fast food joints on Main Street. Also, please clean up and patrol the Elm Grove Beach area. It's only a block from the sheriff station but I won't even go there any more. • Consider more parks and green space to support community growth at the north end of the lake - there are huge plots of lakefront land that are being overrun with homeless encampments when the city could be doing something positive for the communities that live there. • Parques que realmente sean parques que se puedan usar en el verano que provean sombra de árboles. Y unidades para 55 . • Add more businesses and and schools. We don’t need more affordable housing or places for the homeless to sleep in our new parks. Improve this city and make it somewhere higher end investors want to be. City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Update | Community Survey Summary | 6/21/21 11 • The city should not be intimidated by nimbys(not in my back yard) who don’t want any development at all. • nice affordable homes with big lots for gardening. • Highway 74 between Home Depot and The Ortega Highway needs to be widened to 4 lanes. The traffic is atrocious and a stoplight every block and bottlenecks do not help matters. It's like you're participating in a parade!Think about infrastucture before all these housing tracts are approved. • We do not need more low income housing. We do need a new senior center and 55 plus communities w new single story detached housing. Lake street needs to be developed abs we need to find a new builder for the property off Nichols • Lake street and Nichols need to be developed. We need detached housing community for 55 plus. Our senior TWC is awful. Apartments have better facilities. No more low income housing. Maybe a development around the lake. • Work with nicer areas and figure out what’s working for them and why we have such terrible issues with run down areas and homelessness. We are getting worse whereas our surrounding areas are not. Think about that. Quality people over quantity. Enough with affordable housing. • Walkability, greenspace, and environmental impact. • Cheaper rates. California housing is overpriced and people are moving out of state. I'm considering it too if something doesn't change. • Put corner markets near housing so it is accessible by walking. Rosetta canyon is an example of being too far to walk from the stores that are on central. • We need more quality shopping and more options so we do not have to go to another city and buy the goods we need. • A basic standard of living for housing every citizen that needs a home. No matter their income. If we let our people sleep on the streets, we have failed as a community. • Make Grand ave., Riverside dr., hwy 74 Wider. Fix Collier and hwy 74 intersection • Infustructure! Side walks, parks, lighting. No more low income housing. Let's bring folks here that want to better our community. • To not saturate the Summerly area with the new planned housing. Summerly has been hit with all the low income/work force housing next to it and now a potential warehouse build. The city has LOTS of empty space in other areas that can be developed • Cluster of sing family homes impacts our beautiful ecosystem, we are one of the last city’s to grow and we need to stay small country, yet not overcrowding the area with an occupied homes that they people cannot afford(Rosetta canyon). Keeping rural open land draws people to our city because we are the action sports capital. We don’t need to end up like Temecula and menifee over run with traffic it’s not Elsinore best interest. • To avoid creating "housing deserts" that are heavily defended on cars to get to essential services and amenities, such as grocery stores, and public parks. • Make cleaning up the existing areas more often and accessible City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Update | Community Survey Summary | 6/21/21 12 • Please stop doing/building things that create more traffic. We’ll be like Orange County traffic soon. • why can’t living just be free Y’all need to stop wondering why homelessness is so bad • Affordable housing and childcare • stop crowding neighborhoods give larger backyards and space between homes for privacy. • create more bus routes, more grocery stores, remodel the public library, have a hospital and more doctors and specialist • More selection of restaurants and businesses • LE needs to renovate the city. It should get its own police department, bring good stores to the area, get rid of the outlets or get good investors who will make the city great. LE has so much potential but putting a homeless shelter in downtown was a wrong move. It should have been somewhere more isolated. LE should be like Murrieta Menifee and so on those places look really nice. Please do something don’t take so damn long to build. It would be nice to have stores locally where people can shop instead of going out of town. • New housing communities maybe town homes • Many of the existing apartments and houses need serious renovations, consider providing assistance to homeowners who need to update homes and to apartment owners to renovate the complexes • Tener tiendas cerca de las casas nuevas • Remodel neighborhoods in the Avenues on Mill St, and add parks and street lights. • More condos that are affordable. Offer incentives for people who don’t commute and work from home! • Fix the traffic problem on Lake St. • Enforce housing codes throughout city to ensure owners remove debris all around properties and maintain yards consistently throughout the year. Continue to improve roads everywhere and remove graffiti continuously. Create a walking path along the lake to continue to strengthen this wonderful asset in the city. Bring in our own police department to monitor city and remove homeless everywhere around lake. Stop allowing cannabis shops from taking over the city. These establishments only tarnish our reputation further. Just these actions alone will continue to improve the physical image of the city and help us become a more powerful player in the area for being a good and safe community to raise a family. • Take care of what you have first. Protect the residents from LEAPS. • Making Lakeland village part of Lake elsinore and higher standers for downtown elsinore shop fronts! • Limit the number of people and the number of automobiles that are allowed to reside in housing units • Also think about increasing commercial options as housing increases. More business are needed City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Update | Community Survey Summary | 6/21/21 13 • Schools Safety Cleanliness Parks • Put hard working families first by incentivising methods for families to own a home. • Family parks and activities be included in these communities. • Building new homes should be preceded by infrastructure improvements, not fixing traffic problems as a reaction to the new homes/businesses. Traffic in certain areas of the city has gotten much worse because businesses and homes have been added, but the necessary infrastructure to accommodate these construction projects has not been addressed. • Stop the over development before it starts!! You do not have the infrastructure to support 11, 000 new homes. You are killing the environment and neighborhoods that were the reason people came out to Elsinore in the first place. The traffic situation here is bad and only about to get way worse. Lake Elsinore residents have on average the longest commute of any other town in California. The city is slated to added 11,000 plus houses, with only two major arteries in and out of the area. Does that make sense to you? If you are developing why do you not make changes that bring permanent non retail jobs (technology, corporate, government, medical jobs) to this area so your residents do not have a 3 hour plus commute every day? Stop bending over backwards for developers to put in housing you cannot support. • Stop building houses, start building more parks and recreation • 1)Do not promote or develop housing for homeless. 2) Change definition of single family housing so only 2 adults with their children under 18 can live in home. • The prices of family homes for median earning families and traffic • Crime rates, more police, better schools • City should consider the effects of traffic with new housing projects, and upgrade the existing roadways/infrastructure at the same time as housing construction. • Get rid of all of the pot holes. • Expanding the roads to accommodate the traffic flow. Also aquire our own police force. • Definitely affordable housing with easier ways to qualify. Making safe and friendly neighborhoods. • Less apartments and more shopping with communities near by. No more palm trees plant pine trees or more oak trees. • I dont know how you would do it, but the housing market is driving people my age and younger to different towns that have more affordable and available homes/apartments. There isnt any work in LE, people have to drive to work, which adds to bills, traffic, homelessness, etc. There should be a maximum price per sqft any current or new homes can be sold or rented out for. The way it works now forces people who dont make massive wages out of the town and possibly adding to the homeless. A home that is 1000 sqft shouldnt cost 400K or 2500-3000 a month to rent, this community and the working class is being raped by greedy homeowners and City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Update | Community Survey Summary | 6/21/21 14 corporations who can sit with homes on the market indefinitely until someone who is desperate just gives in. Anyone who makes 15-20 an hour will be spending 60-75% of their income on rent and essential bills, instead of the recommended 30%. Single bedroom apartments are more than 70% the cost of 2 bedroom, making it smarter to live with roommates, which exacerbates the crowding (And, again, homelessness - if roommates leave to another state or town, leaving the other person(s) unable to afford rent for a place on their own what are they suppose to do???). This isnt a Lake Elsinore specific problem, but it could be easily solved here if people put their foot down and make real change to our housing laws. • No section 8 or “workforce”housing. No more building apartments around Summerly. I moved here because of the small town feel. Since the section 8 apartments went up there are groups of kids walking around my neighborhood and coming to our parks and pools. Drug dealing and graffiti is on the rise. The schools in lake Elsinore have a bad reputation that’s why kids are going to school in Murrieta. No commercial developments. We don’t want that for our city. Fix the traffic and roads. Take some pointers from Murrieta. That city is beautiful and clean. I don’t see section 8 housing popping up all over or the homelessness we have. Would be nice to have the city do something about everyone selling their homes and kicking renters out at this time. Lots of us renters are searching for a place to live even though we are up to date with our rent. We simply cannot afford the $2,800+ rent that landlords are requiring now. Over 100’s of applications for a single home. There is no hope for here for my family and we are forced to move out of state or risk living in a motel. Lots of people in my place right now all because sellers want to make a buck. I have to take my kids out of schools they love because our landlord wants to sell. We have nowhere to go • Please consider infrastructure first before building. Our roads are horrible and these new huge power poles are such an eye sore. Why aren’t they underground. This city has so much potential with people moving here from Orange County. We could be raising the medium income and attracting better stores if we would stop putting in weed shops and dollar stores. Let’s work on not taking another ten years to grow this city. • Please, oh please, consider creating a low-income or subsidized Senior Citizen safe, clean housing complex here in Lake Elsinore! All housing efforts seem to be focused on the homeless, drug addicted younger folk here. Us Baby Boomers have no place we can afford that is safe, clean and secure. I'm 66, living in an old delapidated RV for 16 years because I can't afford anywhere else. I know other Seniors just like me. Again, please think about the Seniors in Lake Elsinore. • Consider the single-families that have need to live paycheck to paycheck but don’t qualify for “low-income” homes. • More retail and food options every time we go to dinner we go to Temecula. Get homeless out. Stop low income • The city should allow additional garages be converted into additional living space. With the people rules in place this with help the owner as much as and the renter. The city giving out lesser strict permits or forgiveness can open the opertunity to make an agreement with owners and regulate rental by the square footage, utilities, taxes etc. City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Update | Community Survey Summary | 6/21/21 15 I take home about 55,000 and my year end salary gross is $72,800. I still cannot move out because rent is much greater than I can afford (rent+utilities). As a single person why do I not qualify in the income bracket for income limits. Why is my only option to still live with parents or rents a 2,000+ apartment living paycheck to paycheck without any room to save? I work just as hard if not harder but it’s the welfare collecting individuals that given the advantage • sidewalks and incorporate lake land village • Make it more affordable! I don't want to leave Elsinore or Cali. The prices do NOT match the area or quality of the homes/apartments. • Implement environment justice principles to your approach. Displacement and gentrification of current residents should not be an outcome from the new housing element plans. • Add parks and community pools in existing/old neighborhoods. For example the avenues by Railroad canyon elementary school, there are no parks near by for children. • Review the traffic all around • Affordable, family and pet friendly rental HOUSES with yards. My mobile home park has multiple homes with 4 people in a 1 bedroom due to the ridiculous cost of housing, especially during a pandemic. It’s a shame that renters are being taken advantage of. Families with children are hit really hard by this, because one parent has had to be home to homeschool the kids. I know many residents that have moved out of LE because of the staggering rise in housing and how unkept and dilapidated these homes are. Hopefully it changes soon! • Rent is extremely expensive, there are (mostly) only minimum wage jobs around, over populated • I feel that the existing communities especially the Castelina development and the lower area of Tuscany Hills (Tuscana and Summerhill developments) which brought in a large population back in 2000 and helped Lake Elsinore thrive have been neglected. It seems like every time a new housing development opens, code enforcement moves on to those communities to keep them in order and pristine, but the older communities are forgotten. Code enforcement needs to implement the CC&R's imposed by builders/developer's whether or not communities have an HOA. These communities pay mello-roos tax and they lack support and are looking run down due to no enforcement or monitoring. I am very happy and proud to live in Lake Elsinore but sadly my neighborhood is looking rough and I may be considering a move if things don't improve. Also, it is discouraging to see so many vacant buildings especially along Grape Street and even at the LE Outlets. Please work to bring in good shopping and services. No more discount stores or marijuana shops please! • Look around Lake Elsinore. We are a podunk city in comparison to the surrounding cities and we're constantly criticized for it. The city is neglected with mindless projects. MAKE BETTER CITYWIDE DECISIONS! • Restaurants, no more fast food. Good stores st the outlets. They are awful, we want to spend our money here but there is nothing really out here for us. We end up driving to Menifee, or surrounding more developed areas. The Wreck downtown is not a place we feel comfortable going. It feels as though we could get mugged. City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Update | Community Survey Summary | 6/21/21 16 • I would love to see better restaurants, and more stores, like a Trader Joe’s, Albertsons. We also need a hospital, Kaiser. Also, stop building where there is so much beautiful nature. All those gorgeous boulders are being destroyed. That is very sad. Fix the freeway!!! Don’t bring more people without fixing the 15 freeway!! That’s a mess. I truly have learned to love this city and we plan on staying here. • Upgrade roads • Stop focusing on housing and focus on bringing restaurants and other services to your residents. • Wider sidewalks or trails. • More code enforcement is the presidential tract. It’s ridiculous how the lack of enforcement has helped breed crime. • Clean up the trashy people around homes, restaurants and shopping • All infrastructure, such as, adding additional roads, schools, hospital/medical services. Also work with CalTrans to address freeway infrastructure. • Make sure there's a traffic lights that have left turns and right turns only • Bike friendly, you should be able to safely ride your bike from the north end to down town! • To have stores in the area that reflect the communities around them. This city needs more restaurants and nice stores. No more vacant stores. • We don’t need a bunch of low income housing. Crime is on the rise in Lake Elsinore and we’re considering moving because of it. More low income housing will only make things worse. • Ampliación y restauración de las calles para mejor fluidez del tráfico vehicular. • Mix use development near Lake Shore. • LE is growing. As a resident of the community, it would be nice if we have more available stores and shops like our neighboring city(Murrieta/Temecula). Most of the time we drive to either Murrieta or Temecula to shop. It could have been a revenue for the city. LE has potential to become the next City destination. It just needs a lot of work. • Must get rid of all the junky housing that makes Lake Elsinore know as the Meth capital of Riverside County. I live in Canyon Hills and is the only area plus the new area south of the city that I would live in. • We must revitalize the downtown area. We must condemn and rebuild much of old Elsinore. • Public Safety General Plan Upgrades for 20 years • $$$ - Affordable. lower property taxes, it really hurts cause it’s too much on monthly payments including your home. Exemption. More traffic outlet on the 74. There is no outlet at the moment and people have to take long alt route to go home or some wher. • Alternative homes should be allowed for affordable housing ie container homes and tiny on land that is owned • The impact it is having on our schools. Are our schools able to support an influx of new families? Are our schools receiving any additional funding to ensure all student needs are being met? I would also like the City to highly consider the impact additional housing is having on our roads/traffic and to address these issues to the public. City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Update | Community Survey Summary | 6/21/21 17 • Affordability, and integrating neighborhood stores within walking distance such as vons in sycamore creek. • Stop building homes and fix up the town and lake. Clean up all the homes that have drug addicts and squatters in. Fix up all the abandoned graffiti buildings. Do something good for lake Elsinore instead of bringing in more daily traffic. • I feel that there is a demand for all forms of housing in Lake Elsinore. From homeless transitional housing to large lot homes. • Roads to accommodate traffic volume, safety of roads like speed limits and traffic lights • Promote preserve and improve natural open spaces, and trails and nature areas. • To provide accessible shopping for the new homeowners, so they don't have to leave the city they live in to shop or go to a nice restaurant. • Keep housing affordable. Stop the greed. Think about the community and those of us who proudly call this our home. I should not have to move because investors purchased and raised the rent on so many properties. • Sidewalks & bike infrastructure • Country Club heights • Better development along the lake. Riverside drive has several areas along the lake that need improvement. Let's make "the lake" a destination and get more tourists here to enjoy and spend $ in our city. • Road improvements, sidewalks clear of sign obstructions, assess need of and plan for new schools to accommodate the growing population. Public transportation for growing senior population. • Fire all corrupt government and city employees that are contributing to Americans drug and gang problem and are taking kickbacks from drug cartels and gang leaders. • Impact of traffic • Gas, food & shopping off Lake Street exit. Rehabilitation of the Outlets. Outdoor/shopping experience for the family (ex: Dos Lagos or Irvine Spectrum feel) • Give some sort of benefit to Social Service providers. Most of us live and work in the city but we can barely afford to pay our rents. Include social service providers in affordable housing buildings. Or some sort of assistance in being able to purchase a home. • Create less traffic • Unavoidable Services: we need a DMV Field office in LE near the 74/15 that meets the city’s available parking ordinance. A good location would be the old Falla’s suite at the Outlet Center. Not in a residential zone, easy access to the freeway, and not 25 miles away like Norco. 32 miles-Temecula, 40+ miles - Hemet. In the same square miles as these 3 DMV’s, OC has 12 in the same square miles. All we need is our state assembly person & a senator for requesting Additional federal DOT funding. PS. The Chamber has been aware of this request since 2014. So has our former city manager & ASM Melendez. Nothing has been done, except for me, gathering up all the figures and logistics and delivering them in writing. City of Lake Elsinore Housing Element Update | Community Survey Summary | 6/21/21 18 • Walkable city, mixed use zoning, employment opportunities, public transportation (bus rapid system) and connectivity along Freeway • I would like you to consider creating more strip malls and shops for the upcoming new housing. I would also like you to consider revamping the Lake Elsinore Outlets as a better draw to the town. • Have an accessible program that helps homeowners fix up their homes and get rid of weeds • Programs to help people learn how to make their own repairs to their own homes. • More restaurants shopping fun entertainment • Keep in mind development constraints. Either help address them or plan for housing where there are fewer constraints. • Consider the younger generation that may want to stay here but cannot afford purchasing a home in lake Elsinore especially when you have mello Roos and higher taxes on top of the mortgage payment. • Single parents that need housing assistance and income based. That people can easily quailfy for. STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT 2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Suite 500 Sacramento, CA 95833 (916) 263-2911 / FAX (916) 263-7453 www.hcd.ca.gov Karen Brindley, Community Development Director Community Development Department 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Dear Karen Brindley: RE: City of Lake Elsinore’s 6th Cycle (2021-2029) Draft Housing Element Thank you for submitting the City of Lake Elsinore’s (City) draft housing element received for review on August 23, 2021. Pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision (b), the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is reporting the results of its review. Our review was facilitated by a telephone conversation on October 8, 2021, with Diana Gonzalez, Richard J. MacHott, Justin Kirk, and Laura Stetson of your staff. The draft element addresses many statutory requirements; however, revisions will be necessary to comply with State Housing Element Law (Article 10.6 of the Gov. Code). The enclosed Appendix describes the revisions needed to comply with State Housing Element Law. The City’s statutory deadline to adopt a housing element is October 15, 2021. For your information, pursuant to Assembly Bill 1398 (Chapter 358, Statutes of 2021), if a local government fails to adopt a compliant housing element within 120 days of this statutory deadline, then any rezoning to accommodate the regional housing needs allocation (RHNA), including for lower-income households, shall be completed no later than one year from the statutory deadline. Otherwise, the local government’s housing element will no longer comply with State Housing Element Law, and HCD may revoke its finding of substantial compliance pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision (i). Public participation in the development, adoption and implementation of the housing element is essential to effective housing planning. Throughout the housing element process, the City should continue to engage the community, including organizations that represent lower-income and special needs households, by making information regularly available and considering and incorporating comments where appropriate. October 22, 2021 Karen Brindley, Community Development Director Page 2 For your information, some general plan element updates are triggered by housing element adoption. HCD reminds the County to consider timing provisions and welcomes the opportunity to provide assistance. For information, please see the Technical Advisories issued by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research at: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/OPR_Appendix_C_final.pdf and http://opr.ca.gov/docs/Final_6.26.15.pdf. Several federal, state, and regional funding programs consider housing element compliance as an eligibility or ranking criteria. For example, the CalTrans Senate Bill (SB) 1 Sustainable Communities grant; the Strategic Growth Council and HCD’s Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities programs; and HCD’s Permanent Local Housing Allocation consider housing element compliance and/or annual reporting requirements pursuant to Government Code section 65400. With a compliant housing element, the City meets housing element requirements for these and other funding sources. We are committed to assisting the City in addressing all statutory requirements of State Housing Element Law. If you have any questions or need additional technical assistance, please contact Jamillah Williams, of our staff, at Jamillah.Willliams@hcd.ca.gov. Sincerely, Shannan West Enclosure Housing Accountability Unit Chief City of Lake Elsinore’s 6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 1 October 22, 2021 APPENDIX CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE The following changes are necessary to bring the City’s housing element into compliance with Article 10.6 of the Government Code. Accompanying each recommended change, we cite the supporting section of the Government Code. Housing element technical assistance information is available on HCD’s website at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housing-element/housing-element-memos.shtml. Among other resources, the housing element section contains HCD’s latest technical assistance tool, Building Blocks for Effective Housing Elements (Building Blocks), available at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/building-blocks/index.shtml and includes the Government Code addressing State Housing Element Law and other resources. A. Housing Needs, Resources, and Constraints 1. Affirmatively further[ing] fair housing in accordance with Chapter 15 (commencing with Section 8899.50) of Division 1 of Title 2…shall include an assessment of fair housing in the jurisdiction (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(10)(A)) The element includes the Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH); however, additional information is necessary to address the requisite affirmatively furthering fair housing (AFFH) analysis requirement, including local contributing factors to the fair housing issues and develop strong programs and strategies to address the identified fair housing issues as follows: Local Data and Knowledge: While the element includes state and regional data, the element must also include local data and knowledge to supplement the analyses. Local knowledge includes any information obtained through the community participation process. It can be a valuable means of supplementing county and state data and is important for providing context in a fair housing analysis. For more information on using local data, please refer to page 47 of the HUD AFFH rulebook https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/FHEO/documents/AFFH-Rule-Guidebook.pdf. Integration and Segregation: The element includes data on integration and segregation at the regional and local level for race, disability, and familial status (p. 3.34). However, it must also describe local and regional trends and patterns of segregation and integration by income, complemented by data, and concluding with a summary of issues. Racial/Ethnic Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAP): While the element includes information and analysis relative to local R/ECAP, it should also include regional trends and patterns. The analysis must be complemented by quantitative evidence for the regional comparison and describe how the City’s R/ECAP compares to the rest of the City. In addition, the City should also analyze the regional trends and patterns of racial concentrations as it relates to areas of affluence. The combination in the R/ECAP and areas of affluence analyses will help guide goals and actions to address fair housing issues. The analysis should evaluate the patterns and changes over time and consider City of Lake Elsinore’s 6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 2 October 22, 2021 other relevant factors, such as public participation, past policies, practices, and investments and demographic trends. Access to Opportunity: The element provides some information (p. 3.41) on access to opportunity but fails to provide local and regional analysis of trends and patterns for all components. A complete analysis should include local and regional disparities of the educational, environmental, transportation, and economic scores through local, federal, and/or state data; and provide a description of education, environment, and employment. It should also include analyses for disability and access to transit. Please refer to page 35 of the AFFH guidebook (link: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community- development/affh/index.shtml#guidance) for specific factors that should be considered when analyzing access to opportunities as it pertains to educational, employment, environmental, transportation, and any factors that are unique to Lake Elsinore. Disproportionate Housing Needs and Displacement Risk: The element includes data and analysis on cost-burdened households but must also analyze regional trends and pattens on overcrowded households, substandard housing conditions, and households at risk of displacement as well as local and regional patterns of homelessness and conclude with a summary of issues. Site Inventory: The map of the approved projects inventory shows a concentration of very low- and extremely low-income (ELI) sites in low resource areas. The element must describe how the City will address this and include a program to mitigate the impact. Additionally, the analysis should evaluate the sites relative to other categories such as access to opportunity. The analysis should also address how the sites are identified to improve conditions (or if sites exacerbate conditions, how a program can mitigate the impact), whether the sites are isolated by income group and should be supported by local data and knowledge. Contributing Factors: The element relies heavily on Riverside County data to explain contributing factors, but the element should include data specific to Lake Elsinore. The element must list and prioritize contributing factors to fair housing issues. Contributing factors create, contribute to, perpetuate, or increase the severity of fair housing issues, are fundamental to adequate goals and actions, and must be related to the overall analysis. Examples include community opposition to affordable housing, housing discrimination, land use and zoning laws, lack of regional cooperation, location and type or lack of affordable housing and lack of public or private investment in areas of opportunity or affordable housing choices. The analysis shall result in strategic approaches to inform and connect goals and actions to mitigate contributing factors to affordable housing. Goals, Priorities, Metrics, and Milestones: Goals and actions must significantly seek to overcome contributing factors to fair housing issues. Currently, the element identifies program(s) to encourage and promote affordable housing; however, most of these programs do not appear to address AFFH requirements. Furthermore, the element must include metrics and milestones for evaluating progress on programs, actions, and fair housing results. City of Lake Elsinore’s 6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 3 October 22, 2021 Programs also need to be based on identified contributing factors, be significant and meaningful. The element must add, and revise programs based on a complete analysis and listing and prioritization of contributing factors to fair housing issues. Furthermore, the element must include metrics and milestones for evaluating progress on programs, actions, and fair housing results. For more information, please see HCD’s guidance at https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/affh/index.shtm. 2. An inventory of land suitable and available for residential development, including vacant sites and sites having realistic and demonstrated potential for redevelopment during the planning period to meet the locality’s housing need for a designated income level, and an analysis of the relationship of zoning and public facilities and services to these sites. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(3).) The City has a regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) of 6,681 housing units, of which 2,977 are for lower-income households. To address this need, the element relies on vacant sites, including sites in Specific Plan Areas. To demonstrate the adequacy of these sites and strategies to accommodate the City’s RHNA, the element must include complete a vacant sites analysis: Progress in Meeting the RHNA: The element indicates 18,403 units are entitled, of which 4,488 units in the Specific Plan will be affordable to low-income households (p. 4.17, Table 4.8). The element is unclear, however, about whether these units are part of a submitted development project or part of a specific or master plan community where project approvals are still required. For projects that have yet to receive entitlements, the element must include information on remaining approvals necessary prior to entitlement, timing for those approvals, and whether units are expected to be built within the planning period. Sites without pending projects should be included in the sites inventory rather than credited as a project. In addition, to credit units from pending and proposed projects toward the regional housing need, the element must demonstrate the affordability of units based on actual or projected sales prices, rent levels, or other mechanisms establishing affordability in the planning period. Zoning for Lower-Income Households: The site inventory is relying on zoning that allows up to 24 units per acre to accommodate the lower-income housing need. Pursuant to Government Code section 65583.2, subdivision (c)(3)(A) and (B), the element must identify sites with zoning and densities appropriate to encourage and facilitate the development of housing for lower-income households based on factors such as market demand, financial feasibility, and development experience within zones. For communities with densities that meet specific standards (at least 30 units per acre for Lake Elsinore), this analysis is not required (Gov. Code, § 65583.2, subd. (c)(3)(B)). While the element (p. 4.9) lists some affordable developments occurring at densities between 18 and 26 units per acre, the element must include a complete analysis to demonstrate how the zoning is appropriate to facilitate the development of units affordable for lower-income households. Realistic Capacity: The City uses maximum density allowed in the mixed-use zone multiplied by the size of the parcel. The estimate of the number of units for each site must be adjusted as necessary, based on the land-use controls and site City of Lake Elsinore’s 6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 4 October 22, 2021 improvements, typical densities of existing or approved residential developments at a similar affordability level in that jurisdiction, and on the current or planned availability and accessibility of sufficient water, sewer, and dry utilities. The element also needs to analyze the likelihood that the identified units will be developed as noted in the inventory in zones that allow 100 percent nonresidential uses (e.g., mixed-use). If sites are rezoned to mixed-use, consider competing uses, the extent nonresidential uses are allowed, and environmental constraints limiting the usage. Also, there should be analysis on typical densities of existing or approved residential developments at a similar affordability level in that jurisdiction. This analysis should consider the likelihood of nonresidential development, performance standards, and development trends supporting residential development. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU): The element assumes an ADU build out of 12 ADUs per year based on the most recent (2020) production and changes in legislation. Given that the City has produced an average of four units per year between 2019 and 2020, it is not clear if this production level will be achievable in the planning period. As a result, the element should be updated to include a realistic estimate of the potential for ADUs and include policies and programs that incentivize the production of ADUs. Depending on the analysis, the element must commit to monitor ADU production throughout the course of the planning period and implement additional actions if not meeting target numbers anticipated in the housing element. In addition to monitoring production, this program should also monitor affordability. Additional actions, if necessary, should be taken in a timely manner (e.g., within 6 months). Finally, if necessary, the degree of additional actions should be in stride with the degree of the gap in production and affordability. For example, if actual production and affordability of ADUs is far from anticipated trends, then rezoning or something similar would be an appropriate action. If actual production and affordability is near anticipated trends, then measures like outreach and marketing might be more appropriate. Sites with Zoning for a Variety of Housing Types: • Emergency Shelters: The element must clarify if emergency shelters are a permitted use by right and demonstrate the C-M and M-2 zones have sufficient capacity to accommodate the identified housing need for emergency shelters. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(4).) The element must also demonstrate consistency with statutory requirements and include a program, as appropriate. For additional information and a sample analysis, see the Building Blocks at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housing-element/housing-element- memos/docs/sb2_memo050708.pdf. • Transitional and Supportive Housing: The element shows transitional and supportive housing are only allowed in the R-3, RMU and CMU zones, but these housing types cannot be limited to specific zones. Transitional and supportive housing must be permitted as a residential use in all zones allowing residential uses, even nonresidential zones allowing residential, and only subject to those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(5).) The element must describe and analyze the City’s transitional and supportive housing standards as a constraint and add or City of Lake Elsinore’s 6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 5 October 22, 2021 revise programs that demonstrate consistency with Government Code section 65583, subdivision (a)(5). Water Sewer Priority: For your information, water and sewer service providers must establish specific procedures to grant priority water and sewer service to developments with units affordable to lower-income households. (Gov. Code, § 65589.7.) Local governments are required to immediately deliver the housing element to water and sewer service providers. HCD recommends including a cover memo describing the City’s housing element, including the City’s housing needs and regional housing need. For additional information and sample cover memo, see the Building Blocks at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/building-blocks/other- requirements/priority-for-water-sewer.shtml. 3. An analysis of potential and actual governmental constraints upon the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income levels, including the types of housing identified in paragraph (1) of subdivision (c), and for persons with disabilities as identified in the analysis pursuant to paragraph (7), including land use controls, building codes and their enforcement, site improvements, fees and other exactions required of developers, and local processing and permit procedures. The analysis shall also demonstrate local efforts to remove governmental constraints that hinder the locality from meeting its share of the regional housing need in accordance with Government Code section 65584 and from meeting the need for housing for persons with disabilities, supportive housing, transitional housing, and emergency shelters identified pursuant to paragraph (7). Transitional housing and supportive housing shall be considered a residential use of property and shall be subject only to those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(5).) Land-Use Controls: The element must identify and analyze all relevant land-use controls impacts as potential constraints on a variety of housing types (e.g., multifamily rental housing, mobilehomes, transitional housing). The analysis must also evaluate the cumulative impacts of land-use controls on the cost and supply of housing, including the ability to achieve maximum densities and cost and supply of housing. The element indicates that height limits in multifamily zones are restricted to thirty feet, which is the equivalent of two stories. The element should include an analysis of height limits for multifamily in these zones and for those sites identified in the inventory (p. 3.9) as potential constraints and include programs to address or remove any potential constraints as needed. Zoning and Fees Transparency: The element must clarify its compliance with new transparency requirements for posting all zoning and development standards and associated fees for each parcel on the jurisdiction’s website pursuant to Government Code section 65940.1, subdivision (a)(1). Design Review: The element must describe and analyze the design review guidelines and process, including approval procedures and decision-making criteria, for their impact as potential constraints on housing supply and affordability. For example, the analysis could describe required findings and discuss whether objective standards and City of Lake Elsinore’s 6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 6 October 22, 2021 guidelines improve development certainty and mitigate cost impacts. The element must demonstrate this process is not a constraint or it must include a program to address this permitting requirement, as appropriate. On/Off-Site Improvements: The element must quantify subdivision level improvement requirements, such as minimum street widths (e.g., 40-foot minimum street width), and analyze their impact as potential constraints on housing supply and affordability. 4. Local Ordinances: The element must clarify if the City has an inclusionary ordinance. If an inclusionary ordinance exists, the City must analyze that ordinance’s direct impact on the cost and supply of residential development. The analysis should demonstrate local efforts to remove governmental constraints that hinder the locality from meeting its share of the regional housing need and from meeting the need for housing for persons with disabilities, supportive housing, transitional housing, and emergency shelters. 5. Analyze any special housing needs such as elderly; persons with disabilities, including a developmental disability; large families; farmworkers; families with female heads of households; and families and persons in need of emergency shelter. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(7).) Special Needs Populations: While the element quantifies the City’s special needs populations, it must also analyze their special housing needs. For a complete analysis of each population group, the element should discuss challenges faced by the population, the existing resources to meet those needs (e.g., availability of senior housing units, number of large units, number of deed restricted units, etc.), an assessment of any gaps in resources, and proposed policies, programs, and funding to help address those gaps. B. Housing Programs 1. Include a program which sets forth a schedule of actions during the planning period, each with a timeline for implementation, which may recognize that certain programs are ongoing, such that there will be beneficial impacts of the programs within the planning period, that the local government is undertaking or intends to undertake to implement the policies and achieve the goals and objectives of the housing element through the administration of land use and development controls, the provision of regulatory concessions and incentives, and the utilization of appropriate federal and state financing and subsidy programs when available. The program shall include an identification of the agencies and officials responsible for the implementation of the various actions. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c).) To address the program requirements of Government Code section 65583, subdivision (c)(1-6), and to facilitate implementation, all programs should include: (1) a description of the City’s specific role in implementation; (2) definitive implementation timelines; (3) objectives, quantified where appropriate; and (4) identification of responsible agencies and officials. Programs to be revised include the following: City of Lake Elsinore’s 6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 7 October 22, 2021 All programs should be reviewed and revised to include items (1) through (4) as stated above. While many programs contain objectives and timelines, many do not. The element should be revised to address any of these deficiencies, including those noted below: Program 1 (Code Enforcement): This program commits to rehabilitation and preservation of existing units as opportunities arise but should also indicate a specific timeframe and implementation date. The program should be revised to describe its outreach process and how frequently the City will apply for funds. Program 7 (Affordable Housing Development): This program commits to making a list of City-Owned properties suitable for affordable housing available to developers and non-profit agencies, pre-application technical assistance, and incentives. In paragraph three the City commits to providing, when available and appropriate, developer incentives. The program should be revised to clarify what is meant by providing incentives “when available and appropriate” and state how these incentives are decided upon and approved. The program should also be revised to quantify the City’s commitment and offer specific, meaningful actions within the planning period. Program 14 (Special Needs Housing): This program commits to giving priority to special needs projects, encouraging non-profits to pursue funding for special needs housing, and assisting developers seeking state and federal funding. However, it is not clear what specific actions the City is taking in any of those areas. The program should be revised to clarify how the City intends on prioritizing these projects and offer specific objectives to do so. The element should also clarify what actions and how the City intends on encouraging non-profit organizations and assisting developers. Program 15 (Resources to Address Homeless Need): This program commits to addressing needs of at-risk and homeless through assistance to non-profits, continuing to work with non-profit organizations to aid residents in need and offering technical assistance, and using the Lake Elsinore Homeless Task Force to further the City’s efforts. However, it is unclear of what specific actions the City intends on taking. The program should be revised to specify actions and objectives for each category and answer when the City intends on applying for the stated funds and what kind of assistance will or can be granted to the non-profits. Program 19 (ADUs): This program commits to promoting the development of ADUs by implementing a permit streamlining process, providing technical resources, and providing written information. The program should be revised to clarify how the streamlining process will be implemented and clarify the types of technical resources the City plans on providing to interested property owners, and the types of “written information” the City will produce or has available. Program 20 (Specific Plans): This program commits to promoting development within existing and future specific plan areas but does not state how the City will go about promoting development. The program should be revised to offer specific actions and how they intend on promoting different varieties of housing. City of Lake Elsinore’s 6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 8 October 22, 2021 Program 23 (Residential Development Standards): This program commits to reviewing development standards, assessing potential for density increases, and exploring the potential of establishing prototype development plans. The City should consider going beyond exploring and commit to beneficial actions within a specified timeframe. 2. Identify actions that will be taken to make sites available during the planning period with appropriate zoning and development standards and with services and facilities to accommodate that portion of the city’s or county’s share of the regional housing need for each income level that could not be accommodated on sites identified in the inventory completed pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) without rezoning, and to comply with the requirements of Government Code section 65584.09. Sites shall be identified as needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of types of housing for all income levels, including multifamily rental housing, factory-built housing, mobilehomes, housing for agricultural employees, supportive housing, single- room occupancy units, emergency shelters, and transitional housing. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(1).) As noted in Finding A2, the element does not include a complete site analysis; therefore, the adequacy of sites and zoning were not established. Based on the results of a complete sites inventory and analysis, the City may need to add or revise programs to address a shortfall of sites or zoning available to encourage a variety of housing types. 3. Address and, where appropriate and legally possible, remove governmental and nongovernmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing, including housing for all income levels and housing for persons with disabilities. The program shall remove constraints to, and provide reasonable accommodations for housing designed for, intended for occupancy by, or with supportive services for, persons with disabilities. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(3).) As noted in Finding B3, the element requires a complete analysis of potential governmental constraints. Depending upon the results of that analysis, the City may need to revise or add programs and address and remove or mitigate any identified constraints. Program to Mitigate Governmental Constraints: The element must be revised to include a program that mitigates governmental constraints that create a gap in the jurisdictions ability to meet RHNA by income category (Gov. Code, § 65583.2, subd. (c)(3).). Program 25 (Affirmatively Further Fair Housing): Among other components, Program 25 commits to review and revise the definition of family and residential care facilities for 7 or more persons. The City’s current definition of family limits persons in single housing keeping units unrelated to 6 or fewer. The program should be revised to include commitments beyond “reviewing” the ordinance but must commit to specific actions and timeframes to amend definition of family to be consistent with fair housing laws and to address the constraint for the definition of family. In addition, amendments to the zoning code for residential group homes for seven or more persons should not just address state law but also ensure that approval procedures do not constraint development of housing for persons with disabilities. City of Lake Elsinore’s 6th Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 9 October 22, 2021 4. Promote AFFH opportunities and promote housing throughout the community or communities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status, or disability, and other characteristics protected by the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Part 2.8 (commencing with Section 12900) of Division 3 of Title 2), Section 65008, and any other state and federal fair housing and planning law. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(5).) Program to AFFH: While the element includes Program 25 which describes how the City’s fair housing initiatives, it must also include stronger actions that promote AFFH opportunities. For example, the element could include a program committing to implement Government Code section 8899.50, subdivision (b), which requires the City to administer its programs and activities relating to housing and community development in a manner to AFFH and take no action that is materially inconsistent with its obligation to AFFH. Specifically, AFFH means taking meaningful actions that, taken together, address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity, and fostering and maintaining compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws. The duty to AFFH extends to all public agency’s activities and programs relating to housing and community development. C. Public Participation Local governments shall make a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community in the development of the housing element, and the element shall describe this effort. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd.(c)(8).) While the element includes a general summary of the public participation process (pp. 1.4to 1.9), it must also demonstrate diligent efforts were made to involve all economic segments of the community in the development of the housing element. In addition, the element should also summarize the public comments and describe how they were considered and incorporated into the element. The cover letter states the draft was made available to the public August 16, 2021 but was electronically submitted to HCD on August 23, 2021. By not providing an opportunity for the public to review and comment on a draft of the element in advance of submission, the City has not yet complied with statutory mandates to make a diligent effort to encourage the public participation in the development of the element and it reduces HCD’s ability to consider public comments in the course of its review. The availability of the document to the public and opportunity for public comment prior to submittal to HCD is essential to the public process and HCD’s review. The City must proactively make future revisions available to the public, including any commenters, prior to submitting any revisions to HCD and diligently consider and address comments, including making revisions to the document where appropriate. HCD’s future review will consider the extent to which the revised element documents how the City solicited, considered, and addressed public comments in the element. The City’s consideration of public comments must not be limited by HCD’s findings in this review letter. City of Lake Elsinore – HCD Findings and City Response 1 HCD Findings in 10/22/21 Letter City Edits/Response in Revised Draft Housing Element A1. AFFH: Local Data and Knowledge: While the element includes state and regional data, the element must also include local data and knowledge to supplement the analyses. Local knowledge includes any information obtained through the community participation process. It can be a valuable means of supplementing county and state data and is important for providing context in a fair housing analysis. For more information on using local data, please refer to page 47 of the HUD AFFH rulebook https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/FHEO/documents/AFF H-Rule-Guidebook.pdf. Local data added to the Element: 1. Summary of relevant issues from the public outreach process and form historical patterns of development 2. Local fair housing inquiry data from the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County 3. HUD Low- and Moderate-Income area data 4. The Access to Opportunity discussion has been expanded to address educational, environmental, transportation (access to transit), and employmen t factors. 5. Disproportionate housing need: regional context is added as well as a discussion on homelessness. A1. AFFH: Integration and Segregation: The element includes data on integration and segregation at the regional and local level for race, disability, and familial status (p. 3.34). However, it must also describe local and regional trends and patterns of segregation and integration by income, complemented by data, and concluding with a summary of issues. Chapter 3 under the “Segregation and Opportunity Patterns and Trends” heading has been edited to add local and regional trends and patterns of segregation and integration by income, complemented by data (HUD LMI data), and a summary of issues under this heading has been added. A1. AFFH: Racial/Ethnic Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAP): While the element includes information and analysis relative to local R/ECAP, it should also include regional trends and patterns. The analysis must be complemented by quantitative evidence fo r the regional comparison and describe how the City’s R/ECAP compares to the rest of the City. In addition, the City should also analyze the regional trends and patterns of racial concentrations as it relates to areas of affluence. The combination in the R /ECAP and areas of affluence analyses will help guide goals and actions to address fair housing issues. The analysis should evaluate the patterns and changes over time and consider other relevant factors, such as public participation, past policies, practices, and investments and demographic trends. The R/ECAP and Areas of Affluence discission is edited to add a regional comparison, As a result of the analysis, Program 25 is edited to address concentration of minority, low - and moderate- income population, households experiencing disproportionate need and displacement risk. The program includes a list of contributing factors and related action items. A1. AFFH: Access to Opportunity: The element provides some information (p. 3.41) on access to opportunity but fails to provide local and regional analysis of trends and patterns for all components. A complete analysis should include local and regional disparities of the educational, environmental, transportation, and economic scores through local, federal, and /or state data; and provide a description of education, environment, and employment. It should also include analyses for disability and access to transit. Please refer to page 35 of the AFFH guidebook (link: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/affh/index.shtml#guidance) for specific factors that should be considered when analyzing access to opportunities as it pertains to educational, employment, environmental, transportation, and any factors that are unique to Lake Elsinore. The Access to Opportunity discussion has been expanded to address educational, environmental, transportation (access to transit), and employment factors. The Disability discussion has been supplemented with information about housing needs and resources. As a result of the analysis, Program 25 is edited to address disparities in Access to Opportunity. The program includes a list of contributing factors and related action items. A1. AFFH: Disproportionate Housing Needs and Displacement Risk: The element includes data and analysis on cost-burdened households but must also analyze regional trends and pattens on overcrowded households, substandard housing conditions, and households at risk of displacement as well as local and regional patterns of homelessness and conclude with a summary of issues. The Disproportionate Housing Needs and Displacement Risk has been updated to add: • Regional trends and pattens on overcrowded households and substandard housing conditions; • Households at risk of displacement; • Local and regional patterns of homelessness; and • A summary of issues. A1. AFFH: Site Inventory: The map of the approved projects inventory shows a concentration of very low - and extremely low-income (ELI) sites in low resource areas. The element must describe how the City will address this and include a program to mitigate the impact. Additionally, the analysis should evaluate the sites relative to other categories such as access to opportunity. The analysis should also address how the sites are identified to improve conditions (or if sites exacerbate conditions, how a program can mitigate the impact), whether the sites are isolated by income group and should be supported by local data and knowledge. The current analysis evaluates the sites relative access to opportunity: “Most areas designated for future specific plan development are identified as high resources areas …All non- Specific Plan sites (vacant HDR and RMU sites which make up 35 percent of the lower -income RHNA sites) are in lower resources areas in and around Downtown Lake Elsinore and north of the Lake. Based on the AFFH analysis, this area also has a higher proportion of renter households, non -White residents, residents living in poverty, children living in female headed households, overcrowded households, and co st burdened renter households.” City of Lake Elsinore – HCD Findings and City Response 2 HCD Findings in 10/22/21 Letter City Edits/Response in Revised Draft Housing Element The section is edited to address the fact that the sites inventory represents both improved and exacerbated fair housing and equal opportunity conditions. The Section shows the actions the City has and will undertake to ad dress needs in parts of the areas where fair housing and equal opportunity conditions are exacerbated. As a result of the analysis, Program 9 directs the City to pursue land purchases for residential development, redevelop tax -delinquent properties, consolidate parcels to create larger, development ready pads in/near Downtown , pursue modifications to residential development standards to facilitate development in Downtown , and identify funding sources to invest in infrastructure and housing. A1. AFFH: Contributing Factors: The element relies heavily on Riverside County data to explain contributing factors, but the element should include data specific to Lake Elsinore. The element must list and prioritize contributing factors to fair housing issues. Contribu ting factors create, contribute to, perpetuate, or increase the severity of fair housing issues, are fundamental to adequate goals and actions, and must be related to the overall analysis. Examples include community opposition to affordable housing, housin g discrimination, land use and zoning laws, lack of regional cooperation, location and type or lack of affordable housing and lack of public or private investment in areas of opportunity or affordable housing choices. The analysis shall result in strategic approaches to inform and connect goals and actions to mitigate contributing factors to affordable housing. A new section has been added that Identification and Prioritization of Contributing Factors in Lake Elsinore. Two issues and a variety of contributing factors are listed. These are used to inform and connect goals and actions to mitigate contributing factors to affordable housing (see next comment). A1. AFFH: Goals, Priorities, Metrics, and Milestones: Goals and actions must significantly seek to ov ercome contributing factors to fair housing issues. Currently, the element identifies program(s) to encourage and promote affordable housing; however, most of these programs do not appear to address AFFH requirements. Furthermore, the element must include metrics and milestones for evaluating progress on programs, actions, and fair housing results. Programs also need to be based on identified contributing factors, be significant and meaningful. The element must add, and revise programs based on a complete a nalysis and listing and prioritization of contributing factors to fair housing issues. Furthermore, the element must include metrics and milestones for evaluating progress on programs, actions, and fair housing results. For more information, please see HCD’s guidance at https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/affh/index.shtm. The element (particularly Program 25 in Chapter 6) is revised and enhanced with additional program actions based on the complete analysis and listing and prioritization of contributing factors to fair housing issues. 2. Progress in Meeting the RHNA: The element indicates 18,403 units are entitled, of which 4,488 units in the Specific Plan will be affordable to low-income households (p. 4.17, Table 4.8). The element is unclear, however, about whether these units are part of a submitted development project or part of a specific or master plan community where project approvals are still required. For projects that have yet to receive entitlements, the element must include information on remaining approvals necessary prior to entitlement, timing for those approvals, and whether units are expected to be built within the planning period. Sites without pending projects should be included in the sites inventory rather than credited as a project. In addition, to credit units from pending and proposed projects toward the regional housing need, the element must demonstrate the affordability of units based on actual or projected sales prices, rent levels, or othe r mechanisms establishing affordability in the planning period. Chapter 4 has been edited to move the Specific Plan capacity from the approved projects section to the site inventory section. In addition, additional information about the level of entitlemen t has been added to Table 4.6 to show which Specific Plan areas will most likely develop during the planning period. As a result of the revised analysis two Specific Plan were removed: • Villages at Lakeshore Specific Plan: In 2020, permits were issued for full capacity. • Alberhill Villages Specific Plan area: While the Plan has a remaining capacity of over 8,000 units, active mining activities preclude its development within the planning period. The Specific Plan developers and/or property owners have not specifically included affordable units— although any of the projects could be implemented to include affordable units —and housing costs are not yet known. However, a comparison of affordability limits and current home prices and rental rates shows that a portion of the units will be affordable to lower - and moderate-income households based on 2018-2020 market rental and for-sale data. Development within Specific Plan areas will allow for a wider range of housing types, sizes, and amenities and more than ha lf of units will be single family homes. These factors require that affordability be distributed among the low, moderate, and above moderate -income categories. City of Lake Elsinore – HCD Findings and City Response 3 HCD Findings in 10/22/21 Letter City Edits/Response in Revised Draft Housing Element Program 20 has also been edits to add more action items to encourage development of the City’s Specific Plans. Specifically, the City will maintain a list of Specific Plans with remining development capacity and the entitlement levels for each one. The City will reach out every other year to owners/developers of Specific Plans with no entitlements actions to identify any issue that may be within the control of the City. During the outreach process, the City will provide information to owners/developers about available housing funds to assist in the development of affordable housing within Specific P lan areas. Zoning for Lower-Income Households: The site inventory is relying on zoning that allows up to 24 units per acre to accommodate the lower-income housing need. Pursuant to Government Code section 65583.2, subdivision (c)(3)(A) and (B), the element must identify sites with zoning and densities appropriate to encourage and facilitate the development of housing for lower-income households based on factors such as market demand, financial feasibility, and development experience within zones. For commu nities with densities that meet specific standards (at least 30 units per acre for Lake Elsinore), this analysis is not required (Gov. Code, § 65583.2, subd. (c)(3)(B)). While the element (p. 4.9) lists some affordable developments occurring at densities between 18 and 26 units per acre, the element must include a complete analysis to demonstrate how the zoning is appropriate to facilitate the development of units affordable for lower -income households. Due to the availability of undeveloped land and relat ively lower costs (compared to other jurisdictions), housing in Lake Elsinore is more affordable. Many new market-rate units can provide affordability at the lower-income level even at market-rate costs. The sites inventory includes 28 vacant sites zoned to allow 19 to 24 units per acre. In Lake Elsinore, ALL affordable housing developments have been built at similar or lower densities. The Department’s letter states that the element lists “some” affordable developments occurring at densities between 18 and 26 units per acre. In fact, the element lists 7 affordable developments that were built in zones that allowed for densities of up to 18 units per acre and the 4 projects that were developed in a zone that allows up to 24 units per acre. This shows that de nsity is not a barrier to development of affordable housing and that assuming very low -income affordability for HDR and RMU sites is reasonable and supported by data. Chapter 4 under the “Densities Appropriate for Accommodating Lower Income Housing” headi ng is edited to present affordability assumptions for the two categories of sites in the Element: remaining Specific Plan capacity and vacant HDR/RMU sites. Additional information has been added and shows that based on the site locations and the assumptio n that the Specific Plan areas will be more single -family in nature, different affordability assumptions are provided. Realistic Capacity: The City uses maximum density allowed in the mixed -use zone multiplied by the size of the parcel. The estimate of the number of units for each site must be adjusted as necessary, based on the land -use controls and site improvements, typical densities of existing or approved residential developments at a similar affordability level in that jurisdiction, and on the current or planned availability and accessibility of sufficient water, sewer, and dry utilities. The element also needs to analyze the likelihood that the identified units will be developed as noted in the inventory in zones that allow 100 percent nonresidential uses (e.g., mixed-use). If sites are rezoned to mixed-use, consider competing uses, the extent nonresidential uses are allowed, and environmental constraints limiting the usage. Also, there should be analysis on typical densities of existing or approved residential developments at a similar affordability level in that jurisdiction. This analysis should consider the likelihood of nonresidential development, performance standards, and development trends supporting residential development. The discussion on realistic capacity shows that using the median density is reasonable based on similar projects. For the mixed-use sites, we explain that the RMU zone was chosen over the CMU zone because it is in residential areas and is expected to develop wi th a residential character with non-residential uses in a very limit capacity that will not impact densities. The Department’s letter states that “If sites are rezoned to mixed-use” but we are clarifying that the Element does not propose any rezoning. The City has ample vacant land with appropriate zoning to accommodate the RHNA. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU): The element assumes an ADU build out of 12 ADUs per year based on the most recent (2020) production and changes in legislation. Given that the City has produced an average of four units per year between 2019 and 2020, it is not clear if this production level will be achievable in the planning period. As a result, the element should be updated to include a realistic estimate of the potential for ADUs and include policies and programs that incentivize the production of ADUs. Depending on the analysis, the element must commit to monitor ADU production throughout the course of the planning period and implement additional actions if not meeting target numbers anticipated in the housing element. In addition to monitoring production, Per the Department’s letter, the ADU has been adjusted downwards. In 2019, two ADUs were permitted; in 2020, six ADUs were permitted; In 2021 the City has approved nine ADU applications. Although the City believes that demand for ADU development will continue to increase, the ADU estimate of 12 per year (total of 100) has been adjusted to 6 per year (total of 50) based o n current trends and favorable ADU legislation which has created new incentives and streamlined processes to build ADUs and the City’s efforts to publicize ADU development. City of Lake Elsinore – HCD Findings and City Response 4 HCD Findings in 10/22/21 Letter City Edits/Response in Revised Draft Housing Element this program should also monitor affordability. Additional actions, if necessary, should be taken in a timely manner (e.g., within 6 months). Finally, if necessary, the degree of additional actions should be in stride with the degree of the gap in production and affordability. For example, if actual production and affordability of ADUs is far from anticipated trends, then rezoning or something similar would be an appropriate actio n. If actual production and affordability is near anticipated trends, then measures like outreach and marketing might be more appropriate. Sites with Zoning for a Variety of Housing Types: • Emergency Shelters: The element must clarify if emergency shelters are a permitted use by right and demonstrate the C-M and M-2 zones have sufficient capacity to accommodate the identified housing need for emergency shelters. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(4).) The element must also d emonstrate consistency with statutory requirements and include a program, as appropriate. For additional information and a sample analysis, see the Building Blocks at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/community -development/housing- element/housing-element-memos/docs/sb2_memo050708.pdf. Zoning for emergency shelters is addressed under Table 3.3 with a footnote that explains that “Emergency shelters are permitted as a by-right use in the C-M Commercial Manufacturing District and M-2 General Manufacturing District per Zone Code Amendment No. 2012-03 (http://www.lake- elsinore.org/home/showdocument?id=9759). See LEMC Chapter 17.132.150-Emergency shelter use and development standards for details.” In Chapter 3 under the Emergency Shelters and Low Barrier Navigation Centers he ading, zoning for Emergency Shelters is edited to add “by-right”. “In 2012, the City amended the Zoning Code (Ordinance No. CC-2012-1309) to allow for the development of emergency shelters. Consistent with SB 2, emergency shelters are permitted as a by-right use in the C-M (Commercial Manufacturing) and M -2 (General Manufacturing) zones. LEMC Title 17.132.150 (Emergency shelter use and development standards) outlines development standards and operational regulations consistent with State law.” The section is further edited to add a more detailed description of the size, uses, and transportation access to the C -M and M-2 zones. Sites with Zoning for a Variety of Housing Types: • Transitional and Supportive Housing: The element shows transitional and supportive housing are only allowed in the R-3, RMU and CMU zones, but these housing types cannot be limited to specific zones. Transitional and supportive housing must be permitted as a residential use in all zones allowing residential uses, even nonresidential zones allowing residential, and only subject to those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(5).) The element must describe and analyze the City’s transitional and sup portive housing standards as a constraint and add or revise programs that demonstrate consistency with Government Code section 65583, subdivision (a)(5). In Lake Elsinore, transitional housing and supportive housing are permitted in, and subject to the sta ndards outlined in, the R-3, RMU, and CMU zones. As a result, the City will have to amend its zoning ordinance to comply with SB 2. In Chapter 3 the discussion under the Transitional and Supportive Housing heading, is edited to add “SB 2 requires that the City treat transitional and supportive housing as a residential use and only subject to those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone (Government Code Section 65583(a)(5)). In other words, transitional hou sing and supportive housing must be permitted in all zones allowing residential uses and are not subject to any not imposed on similar dwellings (e.g., single - family homes, apartments) in the same zone in which the transitional housing and supportive housi ng is located. For example, transitional housing located in an apartment building in a multifamily zone is permitted in the same manner as an apartment building in the same zone and supportive housing located in a single - family home in a single-family zone is permitted in the same manner as a single-family home in the same zone. The City will amend its zoning standards for transitional and supportive housing to comply with SB 2 (Program 22).” Program 22 in the Housing Plan (Chapter 6) is edited to add SB 2 compliance for transitional and supportive housing as an action item. Water Sewer Priority: For your information, water and sewer service providers must establish specific procedures to grant priority water and sewer service to developments with units af fordable to lower-income households. (Gov. Code, § 65589.7.) Local governments are required to immediately deliver the housing element to water and sewer service providers. HCD recommends including a cover memo describing the City’s The Department’s comments are noted. Program 16 was included in the submitted draft and includes the following action item: “To facilitate effective coordination between local planning and water and sewer service functions to ensure adequate water and sewer capacity is available to accommodate housing needs, following Housing Element City of Lake Elsinore – HCD Findings and City Response 5 HCD Findings in 10/22/21 Letter City Edits/Response in Revised Draft Housing Element housing element, including the City’s housing needs and regional housing need. For additional information and sample cover memo, see the Building Blocks at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/community -development/building- blocks/other-requirements/priority-for-water-sewer.shtml. adoption, deliver the 2021-2029 Lake Elsinore Housing Element to all providers of sewer and water service within the City of Lake Elsinore in accordance with Government Code §65589.7.” 3. Land-Use Controls: The element must identify and analyze all relevant land -use controls impacts as potential constraints on a variety of housing types (e.g., multifamily rental housing, mobilehomes, transitional housing). The analysis must also evaluate the cumulative impacts of land -use controls on the cost and supply of housing, including the ability to achieve maximum densities and cost and supply of housing. The element indicates that height limits in multifamily zones are restricted to thirty feet, w hich is the equivalent of two stories. The element should include an analysis of height limits for multifamily in these zones and for those sites identified in the inventory (p. 3.9) as potential constraints and include programs to address or remove any po tential constraints as needed. In Chapter 3 the discussion under the Multi-family Housing heading is updated to include the following: “Building height requirements in Lake Elsinore are not a constraint to development. Table 3.4 shows that the City has a 30-foot building height limit in all residential zones and no height limit in the two mixed use zones (RMU and CMU). Building code standards require at least 7’6” per floor plus ceiling space for mechanical, electrical and plumbing engineering which allows for development of three stories. The site inventory includes capacity for 2,392 lower income units on sites zoned R -3 and RMU. The sites identified in the RMU zone (1,090 total units or 58% of the very low income RHNA) are not subject to a building height requirement. The height requirement for the sites identified in the R -3 zone (1,302 total units) are not constrained by the building height requirement. Recent affordable housing developments have been constructed in Lake Elsinore with 2 to 3 stories. The 81-unit, affordable Mission Trails Apartment built in 2019 was developed with three floors.” Table 3.4 is edited to note that in the CMU and RMU zones there is no maximum height limit. Zoning and Fees Transparency: The element must clarify its complia nce with new transparency requirements for posting all zoning and development standards and associated fees for each parcel on the jurisdiction’s website pursuant to Government Code section 65940.1, subdivision (a)(1). Chapter 3 under the “LEMC Title 17 (Zoning)” heading has been edited to note that the City of Lake Elsinore Zoning standards can be accessed online through the City’s website (www.lake-elsinore.org/city- government/municipal-code). Chapter 3 under the “Fees and Exaction” heading section in Chapter 3 has been edited to note that The City’s Engineering Division contracts with outside firms for plan check of project -related plans. City of Lake Elsinore Zoning fees can be accessed online through the City’s website at http://www.lake -elsinore.org/city-hall/city- departments/public-works/engineering/fees/plan-check-fees. Design Review: The element must describe and analyze the design review guidelines and process, including approval procedures and decision -making criteria, for their impact as potential constraints on housing supply and affordability. For example, the analysis could describe required findings and discuss whether objective standards and guidelines improve development certainty and mitigate cost impacts. The element must demonstrate this process is not a constraint or it must include a program to address this permitting requirement, as appropriate. A new heading in Chapter 3 (“Design Review”) has been added to e xplain the design review process and list the design concepts and findings required for design review. The design review process is not a constraint to residential development in Lake Elsinore. By and large the City has not recommended denial of residential projects in general and less so on design review. The design review process also does not negatively impact as the City’s already short processing time and the criteria for design review is generally objective. In compliance with SB 330, the City will adopt objective design standards to ensure that the City can provide local guidance on design and clearly articulate objective design standards for by-right projects as allowed by state law (Program 12). Part of the objective design standards creation process will include assessing how the standards can be used to encourage a variety of housing types and limit the size of residential units on multi -family zoned properties to encourage units that are affordable by design. On/Off-Site Improvements: The element must quantify subdivision level improvement requirements, such as minimum street widths (e.g., 40-foot minimum street width), and analyze their impact as potential constraints on housing supply and affordability. Chapter 3 under the “On- and Off-Site Improvements” heading section in Chapter 3 has been edited to add the following information: City of Lake Elsinore – HCD Findings and City Response 6 HCD Findings in 10/22/21 Letter City Edits/Response in Revised Draft Housing Element “Required on-site improvements for residential development are determined largely by the zoning of the property. Lake Elsinore’s requirements for on -site improvements are typical of California communities and are not considered to be unusually restrictive or as a constraint on the development of housing. In a typical subdivision, minimum street right of way must be provided. The City of Lake Elsinore General Plan’s roadway system forms the core of the City’s circulation infrastructure and includes a hierarchy consisting of seven (7) classifications: augmented urban arterial, urban arterial, major, secondary, collector, divided collector, and special new roadway. Streets not shown on the General Plan’s Roadway Classification figure are considered Local Streets. The required street width construction for a typical subdivision would most likely range from a 60-foot right of way for local streets up to 120-foot right-of-way for an urban arterial highway (Figure 2.2 in the General Plan’s Community Form Chapter). Narrower streets may be allowed within some adopted Specific Plans.” 4. Local Ordinances: The element must clarify if the City has an inclusionary ordinance. If a n inclusionary ordinance exists, the City must analyze that ordinance’s direct impact on the cost and supply of residential development. The analysis should demonstrate local efforts to remove governmental constraints that hinder the locality from meeting its share of the regional housing need and from meeting the need for housing for persons with disabilities, supportive housing, transitional housing, and emergency shelters. The City has no local ordinances that directly impact the cost and supply of resid ential development such as inclusionary ordinances, short-term rental ordinances, or moratoriums on specific development types. The discussion in Chapter 3 under the Local Ordinances heading is updated to add the following information: “In the City’s Redevelopment Project Areas all new residential development must pay a $2.00 per square foot Affordable Housing in Lieu Fee. The fee is very low and has not been a constraint or deterrent to residential development.” 5. Special Needs Populations: While the element quantifies the City’s special needs populations, it must also analyze their special housing needs. For a complete analysis of each population group, the element should discuss challenges faced by the population, the existing resources to meet those needs (e.g., availability of senior housing units, number of large units, number of deed restricted units, etc.), an assessment of any gap s in resources, and proposed policies, programs, and funding to help address those gaps. Chapter 2 (under the “Special Housing Needs” heading) has been edits to add information on challenges and resources for the special needs housing groups and includes references to program in the Housing Plan (Chapter 6). B1: Programs: All programs should be reviewed and revised to include items (1) through (4) as stated above. all programs should include: (1) a description of the City’s specific role in implementation; (2) definitive implementation timelines; (3) objectives, quantified where appropriate; and (4) identification of responsible agencies and officials. While many programs contain objectives and timelines, many do not. All programs have been reviewed to ensu re that the required components are present. Objectives have been added to all programs. In cases where there are specific numerical objectives, “Quantified Objectives” are indicated. For programs with more general, non -numerical objectives, “Objectives” are indicated. Program 1 (Code Enforcement): This program commits to rehabilitation and preservation of existing units as opportunities arise but should also indicate a specific timeframe and implementation date. The program should be revised to describe its outreach process and how frequently the City will apply for funds. Program 1 is updates to add a more detailed description of the City’s role, a more specific timeframe for fund application and quantification of progress. Program 7 (Affordable Housing Development): This program commits to making a list of City-Owned properties suitable for affordable housing available to developers and non -profit agencies, pre-application technical assistance, and incentives. In paragraph three the City commits to provi ding, when available and appropriate, developer incentives. The program should be revised to clarify what is meant by providing incentives “when available and appropriate” and state how these incentives are decided upon and approved. The program should also be revised to quantify the City’s commitment and offer specific, meaningful actions within the planning period. Program 7 is updated to clarify what types of incentives are available and how the City decides when to offer financial assistance (based on location within redevelopment areas or based on the appropriate level of affordability). The Program is also updated to add a quantified objective. Program 14 (Special Needs Housing): This program commits to giving priority to special needs projects, encouraging non-profits to pursue funding for special needs housing, and assisting developers seeking state and federal funding. However, it is not clear what specific actions the City is taking in any of those areas. The program should be revised to clarify how the City intends on prioritizing these projects and offer specific Program 14 is updated to provide clarification on the City’s role in implementation, prioritization and source of funds, and an objective has been added to the program. The City will be proactive in advertising available funds to assist in the development of special needs housing by a nnually contacting a list of developers and stakeholders that may be interested in this type of development projects. City of Lake Elsinore – HCD Findings and City Response 7 HCD Findings in 10/22/21 Letter City Edits/Response in Revised Draft Housing Element objectives to do so. The element should also clarify what actions and how the City intends on encouraging non - profit organizations and assisting developers. Program 15 (Resources to Address Homeless Need): This program commits to addressing needs of at -risk and homeless through assistance to non-profits, continuing to work with non-profit organizations to aid residents in need and offering technical assistance, and using the Lake Elsinore Homeless Task Force to further the City’s efforts. However, it is unclear of what specific actions the City intends on taking. The program should be revised to specify actions and objectives for each category and answer when the City intends on applying for the stated funds and what kind of assistance will or can be granted to the non -profits. Program 15 is updated to include specific on funding sources (CDBG), the City’s role in the Lake Elsinore Homeless Task Force and participation in the Regional Homeless Alliance for Southwest Riverside County. The timeframe is clarified to address funding and an objective has been added. Program 19 (ADUs): This program commits to promoting the development of ADUs by implementing a permit streamlining process, providing technical resources, and providing written information. The program should be revised to clarify how the streamlining process will be implemented and clarify the types of technical resources the City plans on providing to interested property owners, and the types of “written information” the City will produce or has available. Program 19 is updated to clarify that the City will abide by the streamlining requirements established by law, the type of technical support and information to be provided as well as a more detailed timeframe and adjusted ADU estimates based on revisions to the ADU projections in Chapter 4. Program 20 (Specific Plans): This program commits to promoting development within existing and future specific plan areas but does not state how the City will go about promoting development. The program should be revised to offer specific actions and how they intend on promoting different varieties of housing. Program 20 is updated to clarify the action the City will take to encourage development of housing in Specific Plan Areas and includes a more detailed timeframe. While development of Specific Plan areas is largely out of the City’s control, the City will maintain a list of Specific Plans with remining development capacity and the entitlement levels for each one. The City will reach out every other year to owners/d evelopers of Specific Plans with no entitlements actions to identify any issue that may be within the control of the City. Program 23 (Residential Development Standards): This program commits to reviewing development standards, assessing potential for density increases, and exploring the potential of establishing prototype development plans. The City should consider going beyond exploring and commit to beneficial actions within a specified timeframe. Program 23 is edited to provide more definitive actions. 2. As noted in Finding A2, the element does not include a complete site analysis; therefore, the adequacy of sites and zoning were not established. Based on the results of a complete sites inventory and analysis, the City may need to add or revise progra ms to address a shortfall of sites or zoning available to encourage a variety of housing types. Program 16: Adequate Sites is updated to reflect edits to the Sites Inventory: • Revision of ADU estimates • Revision to Specific Plan sites and capacity 3. As noted in Finding B3, the element requires a complete analysis of potential governmental constraints. Depending upon the results of that analysis, the City may need to revise or add programs and address and remove or mitigate any identified constraints. Program to Mitigate Governmental Constraints: The element must be revised to include a program that mitigates governmental constraints that create a gap in the jurisdictions ability to meet RHNA by income category (Gov. Code, § 65583.2, subd. (c)(3).). Program 22 is updated to include an action item to amend the City’s zoning regulations consistent with State law that requires that the City treat transitional and supportive housing as a residential use and only subject to those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone (Government Code Section 65583(a)(5)). Program 25 (Affirmatively Further Fair Housing): Among other components, Program 25 commits to review and revise the definition of family and residential care facilities for 7 or more persons. The City’s current definition of family limits persons in single housing keeping units unrelated to 6 or fewer. The program should be revised to include commitments beyond “reviewing” the ordinance but must commit to specific actions and timeframes to amend definition of family to be consistent with fair housing laws and to address the constraint for the definition of family. In addition, amendments to the zoning code for residential group homes for seven or more persons should not just address state law but also ensure that approval procedures do not constraint development of housing for persons with disabilities. Program 25 is updated to remove the “review” action and instead commit to a revision of the definitions for Residential Care Facilities and Family. The edits also clarify that revision of siting regulations f or residential care facilities for 7 or more persons will ensure that approval procedures do not constraint development of housing for persons with disabilities. A more specific timeframe is also added. City of Lake Elsinore – HCD Findings and City Response 8 HCD Findings in 10/22/21 Letter City Edits/Response in Revised Draft Housing Element 4. Program to AFFH: While the element includes Program 25 which describes how the City’s fair housing initiatives, it must also include stronger actions that promote AFFH opportunities. For example, the element could include a program committing to implement Government Code section 8899.50, subdivision (b), which requires the City to administer its programs and activities relating to housing and community development in a manner to AFFH and take no action that is materially inconsistent with its obligation to AFFH. Specifically, AFFH means taking meaningful actions that, taken together, address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity, and fostering and maintaining compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws. The duty to AFFH extends to all public agency’s activities and programs relating to housing and community development. Program 25 has been revised and enhanced with additional program actions based on the complete analysis and listing and prioritization of contributing factors to fair housing issues. An action item related to implementation of Government Code section 8899.50, subdivision (b ) is also included. C. While the element includes a general summary of the public participation process (pp. 1.4 to 1.9), it must also demonstrate diligent efforts were made to involve all economic segments of the community in the development of the housing element. In addition, the element should also summarize the public comments and describe how they were considered and incorporated into the element. The cover letter states the draft was made available to the public August 16, 2021 but was electronicall y submitted to HCD on August 23, 2021. By not providing an opportunity for the public to review and comment on a draft of the element in advance of submission, the City has not yet complied with statutory mandates to make a diligent effort to encourage the public participation in the development of the element and it reduces HCD’s ability to consider public comments in the course of its review. The availability of the document to the public and opportunity for public comment prior to submittal to HCD is essential to the public process and HCD’s review. The City must proactively make future revisions available to the public, including any commenters, prior to submitting any revisions to HCD and diligently consider and address comments, including making revisi ons to the document where appropriate. HCD’s future review will consider the extent to which the revised element documents how the City solicited, considered, and addressed public comments in the element. The City’s consideration of public comments must not be limited by HCD’s findings in this review letter. Chapter 1 has been edited to explain the connection between public outreach and HE contents. Chapter 1 also provides a very detailed list and description of the City’s outreach efforts. Because some Cov id-19 pandemic public gathering limitations were still in place, the meeting was made available through teleconferencing. To ensure that the housing concerns of low - and moderate-income and special needs residents were addressed, the City notified agencies and organizations that serve these communities in Lake Elsinore and surrounding areas. Stakeholder organizations servings families, youth, seniors, persons experiencing homelessness, veterans, and persons with disabilities are included in the stakeholder list. The list of agencies and organizations invited to the study session (and notified of the availability of the draft Housing Element for comment) are listed in Appendix A. In addition to this list, 934 commercial business license holders were also sent workshop invitations. Following the workshop, a summary of workshop comments was posted on the City’s website along with the workshop video recording and presentations. STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT 2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Suite 500 Sacramento, CA 95833 (916) 263-2911 / FAX (916) 263-7453 www.hcd.ca.gov Jason Simpson, City Manager City Manager’s Office City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Dear Jason Simpson: RE: City of Lake Elsinore’s 6th Cycle (2021-2029) Revised Draft Housing Element Thank you for submitting the City of Lake Elsinore’s (City) revised draft housing element received for review on November 24, 2021. Pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision (b), the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is reporting the results of its review. The draft element addresses many statutory requirements; however, revisions will be necessary to comply with State Housing Element Law (Article 10.6 of the Gov. Code). The enclosed Appendix describes the revisions needed to comply with State Housing Element Law. As a reminder, the City’s 6th cycle housing element was due October 15, 2021. As of today, the City has not completed the housing element process for the 6th cycle. The City’s 5th cycle housing element no longer satisfies statutory requirements. HCD encourages the City to revise the element as described above, adopt, and submit to HCD to regain housing element compliance. For your information, pursuant to Assembly Bill 1398 (Chapter 358, Statutes of 2021), if a local government fails to adopt a compliant housing element within 120 days of the statutory deadline (October 15, 2021), then any rezoning to accommodate the regional housing needs allocation (RHNA), including for lower-income households, shall be completed no later than one year from the statutory deadline. Otherwise, the local government’s housing element will no longer comply with State Housing Element Law, and HCD may revoke its finding of substantial compliance pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision (i). Public participation in the development, adoption and implementation of the housing element is essential to effective housing planning. Throughout the housing element Janurary 21, 2022 Jason Simpson, City Manager Page 2 process, the City should continue to engage the community, including organizations that represent lower-income and special needs households, by making information regularly available and considering and incorporating comments where appropriate. Several federal, state, and regional funding programs consider housing element compliance as an eligibility or ranking criteria. For example, the CalTrans Senate Bill (SB) 1 Sustainable Communities grant; the Strategic Growth Council and HCD’s Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities programs; and HCD’s Permanent Local Housing Allocation consider housing element compliance and/or annual reporting requirements pursuant to Government Code section 65400. With a compliant housing element, the City meets housing element requirements for these and other funding sources. We are committed to assist the City in addressing all statutory requirements of State Housing Element Law. If you have any questions or need additional technical assistance, please contact Jamillah Williams, of our staff, at Jamillah.Williams@hcd.ca.gov. Sincerely, Paul McDougall Senior Program Manager Enclosure City of Lake Elsinore’s 6th Cycle Revised Draft Housing Element Page 1 January 21, 2022 APPENDIX CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE The following changes are necessary to bring the City’s housing element into compliance with Article 10.6 of the Government Code. Accompanying each recommended change, we cite the supporting section of the Government Code. Housing element technical assistance information is available on HCD’s website at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housing-element/housing-element-memos.shtml. Among other resources, the housing element section contains HCD’s latest technical assistance tool, Building Blocks for Effective Housing Elements (Building Blocks), available at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/building-blocks/index.shtml and includes the Government Code addressing State Housing Element Law and other resources. A. Housing Needs, Resources, and Constraints 1.Affirmatively further[ing] fair housing in accordance with Chapter 15 (commencing with Section 8899.50) of Division 1 of Title 2…shall include an assessment of fair housing in the jurisdiction (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(10)(A)) The element includes the Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH); however, additional information is necessary to address the requisite affirmatively furthering fair housing (AFFH) analysis requirement, including local contributing factors to the fair housing issues and develop strong programs and strategies to address the identified fair housing issues as follows: Disparities in Access to Opportunity: While the element included some additional analysis (p. 3.47) for access to opportunity, it must still provide local analysis of trends and patterns transportation and environment and a regional analysis for education. The analysis should also address persons with disabilities and disparities in access to transit. Please refer to page 35 of the AFFH guidebook (link: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/affh/index.shtml#guidance) for specific factors that should be considered when analyzing access to opportunities. Site Inventory: The map of the approved projects inventory shows a concentration of very low- and extremely low-income (ELI) sites in low resource areas. While Program 9 was added to mitigate the impact of lower income concentration and the narrative describes how the allocation of sites improves conditions, it does not address how sites exacerbate conditions. Additionally, the analysis evaluates the sites relative to access to opportunity but should also evaluate the income categories of identified sites with respect to location, the number of sites and units by all income groups and how that affects the existing patterns for all components of the assessment of fair housing (e.g., racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (RE/CAPs), integration and segregation, and disproportionate housing needs and displacement risk). City of Lake Elsinore’s 6th Cycle Revised Draft Housing Element Page 2 January 21, 2022 Contributing Factors: While the element includes additional issue areas as well as associated contributing factors, it does not explain how these factors are prioritized in the analysis. The element must prioritize contributing factors to fair housing issues. Contributing factors create, contribute to, perpetuate, or increase the severity of fair housing issues, are fundamental to adequate goals and actions, and must be related to the overall analysis. Examples include community opposition to affordable housing, housing discrimination, land use and zoning laws, lack of regional cooperation, location and type or lack of affordable housing and lack of public or private investment in areas of opportunity or affordable housing choices. The analysis must result in strategic approaches to inform and connect goals and actions to mitigate contributing factors to affordable housing. Goals, Priorities, Metrics, and Milestones: Goals and actions must significantly seek to overcome contributing factors to fair housing issues. While the revised draft includes an overview of two issues in Lake Elsinore along with contributing factors, it does not identify associated goals, metrics, and milestones. The element must include metrics and milestones for evaluating progress on programs, actions, and fair housing results. Programs also need to be based on identified contributing factors, be significant and meaningful. The element must add, and revise programs based on a complete analysis and listing and prioritization of contributing factors to fair housing issues. For sites that are in lower-resourced areas, the element must include specific actions that seek to transform and address disparities in low resourced areas. Furthermore, the element must include metrics and milestones for evaluating progress on programs, actions, and fair housing results. For more information, please see HCD’s guidance at https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/affh/index.shtm. 2. An inventory of land suitable and available for residential development, including vacant sites and sites having realistic and demonstrated potential for redevelopment during the planning period to meet the locality’s housing need for a designated income level, and an analysis of the relationship of zoning and public facilities and services to these sites. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(3).) The City has a regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) of 6,681 housing units, of which 2,977 are for lower-income households. To address this need, the element relies on vacant sites, including sites in Specific Plan Areas. To demonstrate the adequacy of these sites and strategies to accommodate the City’s RHNA, the element must include complete a vacant sites analysis: Specific Plan Areas: The revised sites inventory identifies potential capacity in a number of specific plans for 18,403 units (Appendix B) and relies on capacity to accommodate at least 1,725 of its lower-income RHNA on multifamily sites within those specific plans (Table 4.8). While the housing element indicates the Specific Plans’ residential capacity and estimates the number of units by income group, it does not provide any analysis demonstrating their suitability and availability for development in the planning period or potential affordability. For specific plans that are anticipating a variety of housing types including multifamily, it remains unclear how multifamily is to be accommodated in these specific plans, land City of Lake Elsinore’s 6th Cycle Revised Draft Housing Element Page 3 January 21, 2022 capacity that will be available for multifamily, and allowable densities. To utilize residential capacity in Specific Plans, the element must: • Identify the date of approval of the plans and expiration date. • Identify approved or pending projects within these plans that are anticipated in the planning period, including anticipated affordability based on the actual or projected sale prices, rent levels, or other mechanisms establishing affordability in the planning period of the units within the project. • Provide descriptions of allowable densities, development standards and other requirements for multifamily development anticipated to accommodate the lower- income RHNA; • Describe necessary approvals or steps for entitlements for new development (e.g., design review, site plan review, etc.). • Describe any development agreements, and conditions or requirements such as phasing or timing requirements, that impact development in the planning period. Zoning for Lower-Income Households: The site inventory is relying on zoning that allows up to 24 units per acre to accommodate the lower-income housing need. The element includes additional analysis to substantiate the City’s use of lower income based on “lower real estate costs” and programs to remove constraints. However, the element does not include a complete analysis to demonstrate the feasibility of 24 units per acre density. Specifically, the element must describe market demand and financial feasibility. To address this analysis, the City could consult with local developers. In addition, the element states that over 4,448 units affordable to lower-income households are expected to be accommodated in potential multifamily and mixed-use development in a variety of specific plans. However, the element does not include information allowable densities for multifamily development and therefore HCD cannot make a determination related to the appropriateness of sites within the specific plans to accommodate the RHNA for lower-income. Realistic Capacity: As stated in the previous element, the City uses maximum density allowed in the Residential Mixed-Use zone (RMU) multiplied by the size of the parcel. While the element was revised to indicate there is residential capacity in the Commercial Mixed-Use zone that was not included in the inventory, this information is not sufficient to address this requirement as it does provide support for the capacity assumptions in the RMU. The element should include typical densities of existing or approved residential developments at similar affordability levels within the zone and development trends supporting residential development. Please see HCD’s prior review. Water Sewer Priority: Water and sewer service providers must establish specific procedures to grant priority water and sewer service to developments with units affordable to lower-income households. (Gov. Code, § 65589.7.) Program 16 (Adequate Sites) commits to delivering the housing element to water and sewer service providers but does not indicate a procedure to grant priority water and sewer service to City of Lake Elsinore’s 6th Cycle Revised Draft Housing Element Page 4 January 21, 2022 developments with units affordable to lower-income households. Please See HCD’s prior review. B. Housing Programs 1. Include a program which sets forth a schedule of actions during the planning period, each with a timeline for implementation, which may recognize that certain programs are ongoing, such that there will be beneficial impacts of the programs within the planning period, that the local government is undertaking or intends to undertake to implement the policies and achieve the goals and objectives of the Housing Element through the administration of land use and development controls, the provision of regulatory concessions and incentives, and the utilization of appropriate federal and state financing and subsidy programs when available. The program shall include an identification of the agencies and officials responsible for the implementation of the various actions. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c).) To address the program requirements of Gov. Code section 65583, subd. (c)(1-6), and to facilitate implementation, programs should include: (1) a description of the City’s specific role in implementation; (2) definitive implementation timelines; (3) objectives, quantified where appropriate; and (4) identification of responsible agencies and officials. Programs to be revised include the following: All programs should be reviewed and revised to include items (1) through (4) as stated above. While many programs contain objectives and timelines, many do not. The element should be revised to address any of these deficiencies, including those noted below: Program 14 (Special Needs Housing): This Program commits to giving priority to special needs projects, encouraging nonprofits to pursue funding for special needs housing, and assisting developers seeking state and federal funding. While the City clarified actions and included additional objectives, it did not describe how the City will encourage nonprofit organizations or how it will grant priority for special needs projects. Program 15 (Resources to Address Homeless Need): This Program commits to addressing needs of at-risk and homeless through assistance to nonprofits, continuing to work with nonprofit organizations to aid residents in need and offering technical assistance, and using the Lake Elsinore Homeless Task Force to further the City’s efforts. As stated in the previous letter, it is unclear of what specific actions the City will take to assist nonprofit efforts or what the City’s technical assistance will look like. The Program should be revised to specify actions and objectives for each category and answer when the City intends on applying for the stated funds and what kind of assistance will or can be granted to the nonprofits. 2. Identify actions that will be taken to make sites available during the planning period with appropriate zoning and development standards and with services and facilities to accommodate that portion of the city’s or county’s share of the regional housing need City of Lake Elsinore’s 6th Cycle Revised Draft Housing Element Page 5 January 21, 2022 for each income level that could not be accommodated on sites identified in the inventory completed pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) without rezoning, and to comply with the requirements of Government Code section 65584.09. Sites shall be identified as needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of types of housing for all income levels, including multifamily rental housing, factory-built housing, mobilehomes, housing for agricultural employees, supportive housing, single- room occupancy units, emergency shelters, and transitional housing. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(1).) As noted in Finding A2, the element does not include a complete site analysis, therefore, the adequacy of sites and zoning were not established. Based on the results of a complete sites inventory and analysis, the City may need to add or revise programs to address a shortfall of sites or zoning available to encourage a variety of housing types. 3. Promote and affirmatively further fair housing opportunities and promote housing throughout the community or communities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status, or disability, and other characteristics protected by the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Part 2.8 (commencing with Section 12900) of Division 3 of Title 2), Section 65008, and any other state and federal fair housing and planning law. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(5).) Program to AFFH: While the element includes Program 25 which describes how the City’s fair housing initiatives, it must also include stronger actions that promote AFFH opportunities. The element must be revised to include programs that go beyond status quo actions and include quantifiable objectives and concrete actions that are transformative and overcome patterns and trends identified in the element. For example, Disparities in Access to Opportunity section identifies lack of public investment in specific neighborhoods, the location of proficient schools and school assignment policies as contributing factors, but none of the associated goals address any of these. Additionally, Bullet 2 in the same section should go beyond identifying issues and commit to addressing them once they are discovered. Bullet 4 does not proactively address identified issues such as a concentration of lower- and moderate- income minorities. Bullet 7 should be revised to include a specific implementation date. AFFH means taking meaningful actions that, taken together, address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming RE/CAPs into areas of opportunity, and fostering and maintaining compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws. The duty to AFFH extends to all public agency’s activities and programs relating to housing and community development. City of Lake Elsinore’s 6th Cycle Revised Draft Housing Element Page 6 January 21, 2022 C. Public Participation Local governments shall make a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community in the development of the Housing Element, and the element shall describe this effort. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd.(c)(9).) While the element includes a general summary of the public participation process (pp. 1.4 to 1.7) and describes public comments and how they were incorporated into the element, it must also demonstrate diligent efforts were made to involve all economic segments of the community in the development of the housing element. City of Lake Elsinore – HCD Findings from 01/21/21 Page 1 of 9 HCD Findings in 01/22/21 Letter A.1 Disparities in Access to Opportunities While the element included some additional analysis (p. 3.47) for access to opportunity, it must still provide local analysis of trends and patterns transportation and environment and a regional analysis for education. The analysis should also address persons with disabilities and disparities in access to transit. Please refer to page 35 of the AFFH guidebook (link:https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community‐development/affh/index.shtml#guidance) for specific factors that should be considered when analyzing access to opportunities. A regional analysis for education is added. Additional information on transportation (transit access and job proximity) is added. Edits address areas of high pollution burdens and how they intersect with lower resources and higher need areas (includes persons with disabilities and race/ethnicity) The City’s draft Environmental Justice Element and associated goal and policies is also addressed in the edits. A summary of the EJ Element policies that impact access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods. Edits address persons with disabilities and disparities in access to transit – Transit in Lake Elsinore is concentrated in lower resources and higher need areas of the City west of I‐15 – This includes persons with disabilities. A.1 Site Inventory The map of the approved projects inventory shows a concentration of very low‐ and extremely low‐income (ELI) sites in low resource areas. While Program 9 was added to mitigate the impact of lower income concentration and the narrative describes how the allocation of sites improves conditions, it does not address how sites exacerbate conditions. Additionally, the analysis evaluates the sites relative to access to opportunity but should also evaluate the income categories of identified sites with respect to location, the number of sites and units by all income groups and how that affects the existing patterns for all components of the assessment of fair housing (e.g., racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (RE/CAPs), integration and The section in Chapter 3 titled: Sites Inventory Consistency with Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) has been updated to:  Address how the site inventory exacerbates existing fair housing conditions.  The site evaluation has been expanded to address existing patterns for access to opportunity, racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (RE/CAPs), integration and segregation, and disproportionate housing needs and displacement risk. City of Lake Elsinore – HCD Findings from 01/21/21 Page 2 of 9 HCD Findings in 01/22/21 Letter segregation, and disproportionate housing needs and displacement risk). A.1 Contributing Factors While the element includes additional issue areas as well as associated contributing factors, it does not explain how these factors are prioritized in the analysis. The element must prioritize contributing factors to fair housing issues. Contributing factors create, contribute to, perpetuate, or increase the severity of fair housing issues, are fundamental to adequate goals and actions, and must be related to the overall analysis. Examples include community opposition to affordable housing, housing discrimination, land use and zoning laws, lack of regional cooperation, location and type or lack of affordable housing and lack of public or private investment in areas of opportunity or affordable housing choices. The analysis must result in strategic approaches to inform and connect goals and actions to mitigate contributing factors to affordable housing. Program 25 was included in the submitted Element and included prioritization fair housing issues and contributing factors similar to the example on Page 71 of the HCD AFFH handbook. The fair housing and contributing factors discussion in Chapter 3 is updated to more clearly explain and identify the priority assigned to these. The table under Program 25 is updated to address other related comments in the Department’s finding letter. A.1 Goals, Priorities, Metrics, and Milestones Goals and actions must significantly seek to overcome contributing factors to fair housing issues. While the revised draft includes an overview of two issues in Lake Elsinore along with contributing factors, it does not identify associated goals, metrics, and milestones. The element must include metrics and milestones for evaluating progress on programs, actions, and fair housing results. Programs also need to be based on identified contributing factors, be significant and meaningful. The element must add, and revise programs based on a complete analysis and listing and prioritization of contributing factors to fair housing issues. For sites that are in lower‐resourced areas, the element must include specific actions that seek to transform and address disparities in low resourced areas. Furthermore, the element The fair housing and contributing factors discussion in Chapter 3 is updated to more clearly explain and identify the priority assigned to these. The table under Program 25 is updated to address other related comments in the Department’s finding letter. Program 25 is updated. The two main fair housing issues (prioritized as High) are closely related as such the action items are grouped together. The concentration of minority, low‐ and moderate‐income population, and households experiencing disproportionate need and displacement risk also affects access to opportunity. Many of the same strategies (housing mobility strategies, new housing choices in City of Lake Elsinore – HCD Findings from 01/21/21 Page 3 of 9 HCD Findings in 01/22/21 Letter must include metrics and milestones for evaluating progress on programs, actions, and fair housing results. For more information, please see HCD’s guidance at https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community‐development/affh/index.shtm. areas of opportunity and place‐based strategies to encourage community revitalization) address both issues (disproportionate housing need and disparities in access to opportunity). The program is updated to group actions under three strategy themes. Program actions have been updated to include specific metrics and milestones for evaluating progress. A.2 Specific Plan Areas The revised sites inventory identifies potential capacity in a number of specific plans for 18,403 units (Appendix B) and relies on capacity to accommodate at least 1,725 of its lower‐income RHNA on multifamily sites within those specific plans (Table 4.8). While the housing element indicates the Specific Plans’ residential capacity and estimates the number of units by income group, it does not provide any analysis demonstrating their suitability and availability for development in the planning period or potential affordability. For specific plans that are anticipating a variety of housing types including multifamily, it remains unclear how multifamily is to be accommodated in these specific plans, land capacity that will be available for multifamily, and allowable densities. To utilize residential capacity in Specific Plans, the element must: 1. Identify the date of approval of the plans and expiration date. 2. Identify approved or pending projects within these plans that are anticipated in the planning period, including anticipated affordability based on the actual or projected sale prices, rent levels, or other mechanisms establishing affordability in the planning period of the units within the project. 3. Provide descriptions of allowable densities, development The site inventory section addressing specific plan capacity has been edited to: Expand Table 4.6 by adding 1. Date of approval of the plans and expiration date 2. Approved or pending projects within these plans has not been added as there are currently none ‐ nevertheless various specific plans have submitted applications for new or revised tract maps. Specific plan development in the City is ongoing. In 2020, permits were issued for 146 units in the Villages at Lakeshore Specific Plan. 3. Descriptions of allowable densities for multifamily uses. 4. Necessary approvals or steps for entitlements for new development 5. Phasing information from the Plans. Most indicate a phasing plan but acknowledge that the timing of residential and commercial development is a function of market conditions/demand. Based on the additional information, the unit distribution of City of Lake Elsinore – HCD Findings from 01/21/21 Page 4 of 9 HCD Findings in 01/22/21 Letter standards and other requirements for multifamily development anticipated to accommodate the lower‐income RHNA; 4. Describe necessary approvals or steps for entitlements for new development (e.g., design review, site plan review, etc.) 5. Describe any development agreements, and conditions or requirements such as phasing or timing requirements, that impact development in the planning period. specific plan capacity has been changed:  For multi‐family units in Specific Plan areas, density is used to make the affordability assumptions (consistent with state law). As previously discussed, 24 units per acre is used in place of the 30 units per acre default densities for a variety of reasons discussed under the “Densities Appropriate for Accommodating Lower Income Housing” heading.  Multifamily and mixed‐use units with an allowable density of 24 units per acre are credited toward the very low/low income RHNA. Multifamily and mixed‐use units with a lower allowable density (most commonly 18 and 20 units per acre) are credited toward the moderate income RHNA.  Single‐family units in Specific Plan areas can be credited against the moderate‐income RHNA based on the cost of single‐family homes in Lake Elsinore. But to account for a range of potential home prices, single‐family unit capacity in Specific Plan areas is split evenly between the moderate‐ and above moderate‐income categories. A.2 Zoning for Lower‐Income Households The site inventory is relying on zoning that allows up to 24 units per acre to accommodate the lower‐income housing need. The element includes additional analysis to substantiate the City’s use of lower income based on “lower real estate costs” and programs to remove constraints. However, the element does not include a complete analysis to demonstrate the feasibility of 24 units per acre density. Specifically, the element must describe market demand and financial feasibility. To address this analysis, the City could consult with local The use of 24 du/ac as density suitable for development of affordable housing is realistic given the lower development costs and that a significant number of affordable housing developments in the City have been constructed at densities lower than the 30 units per acre default density. Specifically, affordable housing units (affordable to very low‐ and low‐income households) have most commonly been built in zones with a maximum allowed density of 18 units per acre. The Broadstone Rivers Edge Apartments (2007), Pottery Court City of Lake Elsinore – HCD Findings from 01/21/21 Page 5 of 9 HCD Findings in 01/22/21 Letter developers. In addition, the element states that over 4,448 units affordable to lower‐income households are expected to be accommodated in potential multifamily and mixed‐use development in a variety of specific plans. However, the element does not include information allowable densities for multifamily development and therefore HCD cannot make a determination related to the appropriateness of sites within the specific plans to accommodate the RHNA for lower income. (2011), Mission Trails Apartments (2020), and the Cottages at Mission Trails (2020) developments (all affordable housing projects) were developed on properties allowing a maximum of 18 units per acre. The element has been updated to include information from two developers that expands of the market demand and financial feasibility aspect of development and confirms the approach used in the Element. For specific plan, an expanded table is included that includes densities for multifamily units – as a result the capacity distribution has been changed for multi‐family units. Multifamily and mixed‐use units with an allowable density of 24 units per acre are credited toward the very low/low income RHNA. The Element indicates that this is an appropriate density for affordable housing development. Multifamily and mixed‐use units with a lower allowable density (most commonly 18 and 20 units per acre) are credited toward the moderate income RHNA. A.2 Realistic Capacity As stated in the previous element, the City uses maximum density allowed in the Residential Mixed‐Use zone (RMU) multiplied by the size of the parcel. While the element was revised to indicate there is residential capacity in the Commercial Mixed‐Use zone that was not included in the inventory, this information is not sufficient to address this requirement as it does provide support for the capacity assumptions in the RMU. The element should include typical densities of existing or approved residential developments at similar affordability levels within the zone and development trends supporting residential Because RMU allows for combined residential/non‐commercial uses in a manner that protects the maximum density and facilitates development of affordable units at higher densities, a 24‐unit per acre realistic capacity is feasible. Nonetheless, the element is edited to use the median allowable density (22 units per acre), to account for land use controls and site improvements and to mirror expected development in the HDR zone. A survey of all developed RMU properties show only two non‐residential uses (a commercial strip center built in 1978 and a church built in the 1960s) and City of Lake Elsinore – HCD Findings from 01/21/21 Page 6 of 9 HCD Findings in 01/22/21 Letter development. Please see HCD’s prior review. both pre‐date the creation of the RMU zone (in 2011). No properties have been developed since 2011 (when the RMU zone was adopted) although a five‐unit multifamily rehabilitation project was completed in 2017. Nonresidential uses will not affect capacity. To assess the potential for nonresidential demand in the RMU zone and to assess the appropriateness of densities in the RMU and HDR zones, two developers with experience working in Lake Elsinore were interviewed. Both interviewees confirmed that in the areas of Lake Elsinore where the RMU zone is located, the market demand is overwhelmingly for residential standalone development and that the potential for non‐residential development would not affect the densities achievable on identified sites. A.2 Water Sewer Priority Water and sewer service providers must establish specific procedures to grant priority water and sewer service to developments with units affordable to lower‐income households. (Gov. Code, § 65589.7.) Program 16 (Adequate Sites) commits to delivering the housing element to water and sewer service providers but does not indicate a procedure to grant priority water and sewer service to developments with units affordable to lower‐income households. Please See HCD’s prior review. The City does not provide water and sewer services. as of March 2022, the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD), which provides water and sewer services to the City, indicated that it was unclear if procedures are in place to grant priority for the provision of water and sewer services to proposed developments that include units affordable to lower‐income households as required by Government Code 65589.7. The City of Lake Elsinore does not have jurisdiction over the District as such, EVMWD was alerted of the requirements under Government Code §65589.7 and staff at EVMWD indicated that they would confirm by May or June 2022 if procedures are place. B.1 Program 14 (Special Needs Housing) This Program commits to giving priority to special needs projects, encouraging nonprofits to pursue funding for special needs housing, Program 14 is edited to: 1. expand on funding priority 2. adding additional actions City of Lake Elsinore – HCD Findings from 01/21/21 Page 7 of 9 HCD Findings in 01/22/21 Letter and assisting developers seeking state and federal funding. While the City clarified actions and included additional objectives, it did not describe how the City will encourage nonprofit organizations or how it will grant priority for special needs projects. B.1 Program 15 (Resources to Address Homeless Need) This Program commits to addressing needs of at‐risk and homeless through assistance to nonprofits, continuing to work with nonprofit organizations to aid residents in need and offering technical assistance, and using the Lake Elsinore Homeless Task Force to further the City’s efforts. As stated in the previous letter, it is unclear of what specific actions the City will take to assist nonprofit efforts or what the City’s technical assistance will look like. The Program should be revised to specify actions and objectives for each category and answer when the City intends on applying for the stated funds and what kind of assistance will or can be granted to the nonprofits. Program 15 is updated to add specific actions including: The City will annually contact service providers and share identified levels of CDBG or other available funds (including City funds) for homeless resources programs. The technical assistance action is expanded to provide more detail on available assistance including preapplication consultation, identification of available City funding or incentives such as expedited permit processing, flexibility in development standards and reduced, waived, or subsidized development and impact fees. Actions have been added to the timeframe for the program: “List of City‐owned properties appropriate for affordable or special needs housing by December 2022; Annual contact with special needs stakeholders to advertise available City funds if funding is available (including sharing a list of City‐owned properties that can be used for affordable or special needs housing and available funding sources).” B.2 As noted in Finding A2, the element does not include a complete site analysis, therefore, the adequacy of sites and zoning were not established. Based on the results of a complete sites inventory and analysis, the City may need to add or revise programs to address a Chapter 4: Housing Resources And Sites Inventory has been updated to clarify and edit specific plan capacity affordability assumptions, expand the discussion on zoning to accommodate the lower‐income housing need, and realistic capacity for the RMU sites have been changed. The site City of Lake Elsinore – HCD Findings from 01/21/21 Page 8 of 9 HCD Findings in 01/22/21 Letter shortfall of sites or zoning available to encourage a variety of housing types. inventory capacity has been updated to reflect these changes. B.3 Program to AFFH While the element includes Program 25 which describes how the City’s fair housing initiatives, it must also include stronger actions that promote AFFH opportunities. The element must be revised to include programs that go beyond status quo actions and include quantifiable objectives and concrete actions that are transformative and overcome patterns and trends identified in the element. For example, Disparities in Access to Opportunity section identifies lack of public investment in specific neighborhoods, the location of proficient schools and school assignment policies as contributing factors, but none of the associated goals address any of these. Additionally, Bullet 2 in the same section should go beyond identifying issues and commit to addressing them once they are discovered. Bullet 4 does not proactively address identified issues such as a concentration of lower‐ and moderate‐income minorities. Bullet 7 should be revised to include a specific implementation date. AFFH means taking meaningful actions that, taken together, address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming RE/CAPs into areas of opportunity, and fostering and maintaining compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws. The duty to AFFH extends to all public agency’s activities and programs relating to housing and community development. Program 25 is updated. The two main fair housing issues (prioritized as High) are closely related as such the action items are grouped together. The concentration of minority, low‐ and moderate‐income population, and households experiencing disproportionate need and displacement risk also affects access to opportunity. Many of the same strategies (housing mobility strategies, new housing choices in areas of opportunity and place‐based strategies to encourage community revitalization) address both issues (disproportionate housing need and disparities in access to opportunity). The program is updated to group actions under three strategy themes. Program actions have been updated to include specific metrics and milestones for evaluating progress. In addition to expanding on details and timeframes for existing actions, several new actions address  School assignment policies  Affirmatively marketing available development sites  Adopt an Environmental Justice Element Concentration of lower‐ and moderate‐income minorities I s addressed through program actions under the New Housing Choice in higher opportunity areas heading in Program 25. The program action for outreach to lower income and minority residents is updated to include a specific implementation details and date. City of Lake Elsinore – HCD Findings from 01/21/21 Page 9 of 9 HCD Findings in 01/22/21 Letter C.1 While the element includes a general summary of the public participation process (pp. 1.4 to 1.7) and describes public comments and how they were incorporated into the element, it must also demonstrate diligent efforts were made to involve all economic segments of the community in the development of the housing element. Chapter 1: Introduction is edited to add an AFFH section at the end of the chapter and describes the City’s diligent efforts to involve all economic segments of the community in the development of the housing element. STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT 2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Suite 500 Sacramento, CA 95833 (916) 263-2911 / FAX (916) 263-7453 www.hcd.ca.gov June 14, 2022 Jason Simpson, City Manager City Manager’s Office City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Dear Jason Simpson: RE: Review of the City of Lake Elsinore’s 6th Cycle (2021-2029) Revised Draft Housing Element Thank you for submitting the City of Lake Elsinore’s (City) revised draft housing element received for review on April 15, 2022. Pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision (b), the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is reporting the results of its review. The draft element addresses many statutory requirements described in HCD’s January 21, 2022 review; however, revisions will be necessary to comply with State Housing Element Law (Article 10.6 of the Gov. Code) as follows. 1. Affirmatively further[ing] fair housing in accordance with Chapter 15 (commencing with Section 8899.50) of Division 1 of Title 2…shall include an assessment of fair housing in the jurisdiction (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(10)(A)) Goals, Priorities, Metrics, and Milestones: Goals and actions must significantly seek to overcome contributing factors to fair housing issues. While the revised draft identifies associated goals actions for most of the key areas, the element must also include goals and actions to mitigate displacement risk. Furthermore, for all programs to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH), the element must include specific metrics and milestones for evaluating progress. For more information, please see HCD’s guidance at https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community- development/affh/index.shtm. 2. An inventory of land suitable and available for residential development, including vacant sites and sites having realistic and demonstrated potential for redevelopment during the planning period to meet the locality’s housing need for a designated Jason Simpson, City Manager Page 2 income level, and an analysis of the relationship of zoning and public facilities and services to these sites. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(3).) Identify actions that will be taken to make sites available during the planning period with appropriate zoning and development standards and with services and facilities to accommodate that portion of the city’s or county’s share of the regional housing need for each income level that could not be accommodated on sites identified in the inventory...(Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(1).) Specific Plan Areas: The revised sites inventory identifies potential capacity in a number of specific plans for 18,403 units (Appendix B) and relies on capacity to accommodate at least 1,725 of its lower-income regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) on multifamily sites within those specific plans (Table 4.8). However, to demonstrate the adequacy of these sites to accommodate the RHNA for lower- income households, additional information is necessary to show development potential within the planning period. First, the element now indicates that several Specific Plans have phasing requirements; however, it remains unclear the expected buildout timing for each phase, what conditions must be achieved prior to further phasing, which phase multifamily can be accommodated, and if future phases can be achieved during the planning period. Additionally, it is not clear how multifamily is to be accommodated (e.g. land capacity) within each specific plan. The element should provide indication of where the multifamily is to be located (e.g. map or other description of the specific plan), how much land is available for multifamily development (e.g. acreage), descriptions of any existing parcels, and describe additional entitlements or steps needed to build multifamily housing (e.g. subdivision map, lot splits, site plan review, design review, etc.). Water Sewer Priority: As stated in the previous element, water and sewer service providers must establish specific procedures to grant priority water and sewer service to developments with units affordable to lower-income households. (Gov. Code, § 65589.7.) The element Indicated that the City is not responsible for water and sewer services and is unclear if there is a procedure in place to facilitate priority water and sewer services to affordable developments servicing lower income households, but will have an answer from the provider by June 2022. However, HCD understands that no response has been received as of the beginning of June. The revised element should be revised to include this information once received. Programs: As noted above, the element does not include a complete site analysis; therefore, the adequacy of sites and zoning were not established. Based on the results of a complete sites inventory and analysis, the City may need to add or revise programs to address a shortfall of sites or zoning available to encourage a variety of housing types. Jason Simpson, City Manager Page 3 The element will meet the statutory requirements of State Housing Element Law once it has been revised and re-adopted to comply with the above requirements. Public participation in the development, adoption and implementation of the housing element is essential to effective housing planning. Throughout the housing element process, the City should continue to engage the community, including organizations that represent lower-income and special needs households, by making information regularly available and considering and incorporating comments where appropriate. Please be aware, any revisions to the element must be posted on the local government’s website and to email a link to all individuals and organizations that have previously requested notices relating to the local government’s housing element at least seven days before submitting to HCD. For your information, some general plan element updates are triggered by housing element adoption. HCD reminds the City to consider timing provisions and welcomes the opportunity to provide assistance. For information, please see the Technical Advisories issued by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research at: https://www.opr.ca.gov/planning/general-plan/guidelines.html. Several federal, state, and regional funding programs consider housing element compliance as an eligibility or ranking criteria. For example, the CalTrans Senate Bill (SB) 1 Sustainable Communities grant; the Strategic Growth Council and HCD’s Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities programs; and HCD’s Permanent Local Housing Allocation consider housing element compliance and/or annual reporting requirements pursuant to Government Code section 65400. With a compliant housing element, the City meets housing element requirements for these and other funding sources. We are committed to assist the City in addressing all statutory requirements of State Housing Element Law. If you have any questions or need additional technical assistance, please contact Jamillah Williams, of our staff, at Jamillah.Williams@hcd.ca.gov. Sincerely, Melinda Coy Senior Housing Accountability Manager City of Lake Elsinore – HCD Findings from 06/14/22 Findings Letter Page 1 of 2 HCD Findings in 06/14/22 Letter Response 1. AFFH: Goals, Priorities, Metrics, and Milestones: Goals and actions must significantly seek to overcome contributing factors to fair housing issues. While the revised draft identifies associated goals actions for most of the key areas, 1.the element must also include goals and actions to mitigate displacement risk. 2. Furthermore, for all programs to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH), the element must include specific metrics and milestones for evaluating progress. For more information, please see HCD’s guidance at https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/affh/index.shtm. CHAPTER 6 Policy 5.3 has been updated to address displacement and Program 25 has been updated with actions to mitigate displacement risk. All program actions for Program 25 include specific metrics and milestones for evaluating progress. 2. Site Inventory: Specific Plan Areas: The revised sites inventory identifies potential capacity in a number of specific plans for 18,403 units (Appendix B) and relies on capacity to accommodate at least 1,725 of its lower-income regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) on multifamily sites within those specific plans (Table 4.8). However, to demonstrate the adequacy of these sites to accommodate the RHNA for lower-income households, additional information is necessary to show development potential within the planning period. First, the element now indicates that several Specific Plans have phasing requirements; however, it remains unclear the expected buildout timing for each phase, what conditions must be achieved prior to further phasing, which phase multifamily can be accommodated, and if future phases can be achieved during the planning period. Additionally, it is not clear how multifamily is to be accommodated (e.g. land capacity) within each specific plan. The element should provide: 1. indication of where the multifamily is to be located (e.g. map or other description of the specific plan) – 2. how much land is available for multifamily development (e.g. acreage), 3. descriptions of any existing parcels 4. and describe additional entitlements or steps needed to build multifamily housing (e.g. subdivision map, lot splits, site plan review, design review, etc.). CHAPTER 4 The Specific Plans included in the sites inventory indicate a phasing plan, but all acknowledge that the timing of residential and commercial development is a function of market conditions. Table 4.6 shows the level of entitlement activity for each plan area. While there are no pending projects, various specific plans have submitted applications for new or revised tract maps. Specific plan development in the City is ongoing. In 2020, permits were issued for 146 units in the Villages at Lakeshore Specific Plan. During the review one SP was removed that, while still having available capacity, needed land set aside for habitat preservation (per the Riverside County MSHCP) which might reduce the capacity allowed. Another one was removed during an earlier review due to uncertainty about timing. AS a result, none of the remaining Specific Plans listed in Table 4.6 have any site restrictions or governmental City of Lake Elsinore – HCD Findings from 06/14/22 Findings Letter Page 2 of 2 HCD Findings in 06/14/22 Letter Response constraints that would delay development of the identified remaining capacity. Table 4.6 is updated to add information on: • Location of residential uses -including MF residential if the Plan includes that type of development. • Acreage for residential uses including MF residential if the Plan includes that type of development. • A description of the Plan area parcelization. Table 4.6 previously included the entitlement actions needed to move forward. 2. Site Inventory: Water Sewer Priority: As stated in the previous element, water and sewer service providers must establish specific procedures to grant priority water and sewer service to developments with units affordable to lower-income households. (Gov. Code, § 65589.7.) The element Indicated that the City is not responsible for water and sewer services and is unclear if there is a procedure in place to facilitate priority water and sewer services to affordable developments servicing lower income households but will have an answer from the provider by June 2022. However, HCD understands that no response has been received as of the beginning of June. The revised element should be revised to include this information once received. CHAPTER 6 Program 16 is updated to reflect the status of EVMWD’s priority service procedures. EVMWD staff indicated that they would take action to put a compliant procedure in place to grant priority for the provision of water and sewer services to proposed developments that include units affordable to lower-income households. 2. Site Inventory: Programs: As noted above, the element does not include a complete site analysis; therefore, the adequacy of sites and zoning were not established. Based on the results of a complete sites inventory and analysis, the City may need to add or revise programs to address a shortfall of sites or zoning available to encourage a variety of housing types. No edits are required based on the above edits. APPENDIX B Sites Inventory This page left intentionally blank Table A: Housing Element Sites Inventory, Table Starts in Cell A2Jurisdiction Name Site Address/Intersection 5 Digit ZIP CodeAssessor Parcel NumberConsolidated SitesGeneral Plan Designation (Current)Zoning Designation (Current)Minimum Density Allowed (units/acre)Max Density Allowed (units/acre)Parcel Size (Acres)Existing Use/VacancyInfrastructure Publicly-Owned Site StatusIdentified in Last/Last Two Planning Cycle(s)Lower Income CapacityModerate Income CapacityAbove Moderate Income CapacityTotal CapacityOptional Information SITE NAMELAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 5 92530373071023AHDRR30.77 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending Project Used in Two Consecutive Prior 090090 App prjct Tessera 90unitsLAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 5 92530373071028AHDRR31.87 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending Project Used in Two Consecutive Prior 0000App prjct Tessera 90unitsLAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 5 92530373071021AHDRR31.50 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending Project Used in Two Consecutive Prior 0000App prjct Tessera 90unitsLAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 5 92530373071020AHDRR31.74 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending Project Used in Two Consecutive Prior 0000App prjct Tessera 90unitsLAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 5 92530373071027AHDRR30.02 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending Project Used in Two Consecutive Prior 0000App prjct Tessera 90unitsLAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 5 92530373071026AHDRR30.40 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending Project Used in Two Consecutive Prior 0000App prjct Tessera 90unitsLAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 5 92530373071022AHDRR31.34 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending Project Used in Two Consecutive Prior 0000App prjct Tessera 90unitsLAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 5 92530373071024AHDRR30.27 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending Project Used in Two Consecutive Prior 0000App prjct Tessera 90unitsLAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 5 92530373071025AHDRR30.81 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Pending Project Used in Two Consecutive Prior 0000App prjct Tessera 90unitsLAKE ELSINOREAllan St /Cambern Av 92532377380015HDRR319241.97 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available430043 R3 1LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Mohr St92530374022022BHDRR319240.21 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 2LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Mohr St92530374022007BHDRR319240.43 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 9009R3 2LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Mohr St92530374022024BHDRR319240.21 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 2LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Mohr St92530374022019BHDRR319240.21 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 2LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Mohr St92530374022025BHDRR319240.21 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 2LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Mohr St92530374022023BHDRR319240.21 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 2LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av bw Mohr St/Silver S92530374024013CHDRR319240.23 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 3LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av bw Mohr St/Silver S92530374024016CHDRR319240.06 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 1001R3 3LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av bw Mohr St/Silver S92530374024007CHDRR319240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003R3 3LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av bw Mohr St/Silver S92530374024014CHDRR319240.06 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 1001R3 3LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av bw Mohr St/Silver S92530374024005CHDRR319240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002R3 3LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av bw Mohr St/Silver S92530374024006CHDRR319240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003R3 3LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av bw Mohr St/Silver S92530374024012CHDRR319240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003R3 3LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av bw Mohr St/Silver S92530374024017CHDRR319240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002R3 3LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av bw Mohr St/Silver S92530374024001CHDRR319240.22 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 3LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av bw Mohr St/Silver S92530374024009CHDRR319240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003R3 3LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av bw Mohr St/Silver S92530374024003CHDRR319240.06 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 1001R3 3LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av bw Mohr St/Silver S92530374024008CHDRR319241.72 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 380038 R3 3LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av bw Mohr St/Silver S92530374024011CHDRR319240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003R3 3LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av bw Mohr St/Silver S92530374024004CHDRR319240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003R3 3LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av bw Mohr St/Silver S92530374024010CHDRR319240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003R3 3LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av bw Mohr St/Silver S92530374024015CHDRR319240.06 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 1001R3 3LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av bw Mohr St/Silver S92530374024002CHDRR319240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002R3 3LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av/Silver St 92530374025022DHDRR319240.27 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 6006R3 4LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av/Silver St 92530374025010DHDRR319240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003R3 4LAKE ELSINOREOleander Av/Silver St 92530374025011DHDRR319240.14 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003R3 4LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031015EHDRR319240.21 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031016EHDRR319240.10 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031018EHDRR319240.21 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031019EHDRR319240.20 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031017EHDRR319240.09 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031025EHDRR319240.19 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031024EHDRR319240.20 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031026EHDRR319240.17 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031023EHDRR319240.20 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031013EHDRR319240.10 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031012EHDRR319240.10 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031014EHDRR319240.20 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031027EHDRR319240.20 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031002EHDRR319240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031005EHDRR319240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031008EHDRR319240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031006EHDRR319240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031009EHDRR319240.21 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031011EHDRR319240.19 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031003EHDRR319240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031020EHDRR319240.20 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031001EHDRR319240.19 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031004EHDRR319240.21 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031007EHDRR319240.21 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 5LAKE ELSINOREbounded by Pottery St/Lewis St/ 92530374031010EHDRR319240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002R3 5LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Lewis St92530374032002FHDRR319240.21 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 6LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Lewis St92530374032005FHDRR319240.21 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 6LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Lewis St92530374032006FHDRR319240.22 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 6LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Lewis St92530374032003FHDRR319240.20 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 6LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Lewis St92530374032004FHDRR319240.22 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 6LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Lewis St92530374032001FHDRR319240.21 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 6LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Lowell St92530374041027GHDRR319240.29 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 6006R3 7LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Lowell St92530374041026GHDRR319240.21 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 7LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Lowell St92530374041029GHDRR319240.29 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 6006R3 7LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Lowell St92530374041002GHDRR319240.20 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 7LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Lowell St92530374041003GHDRR319240.20 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 7LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Lowell St92530374041028GHDRR319240.21 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 7LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Lowell St92530374041008GHDRR319240.20 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 7LAKE ELSINORELangstaff St92530377231040HDRR319241.04 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 230023 R3 8LAKE ELSINOREPottery St/Langstaff St 92530374061015HHDRR319240.19 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 9LAKE ELSINOREPottery St/Langstaff St 92530374061029HHDRR319240.20 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 9LAKE ELSINOREPottery St/Langstaff St 92530374061028HHDRR319240.19 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 9LAKE ELSINOREPottery St/Langstaff St 92530374061014HHDRR319240.20 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 9LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Scrivener St 92530374232008IHDRR319240.20 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available4004R3 10LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Scrivener St 92530374232025IHDRR319240.15 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available3003R3 10LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Scrivener St 92530374232007IHDRR319240.20 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available4004R3 10LAKE ELSINOREEllis St at Sumner St92530377292018JHDRR319240.29 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 6006R3 11LAKE ELSINOREEllis St at Sumner St92530377292019JHDRR319240.08 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002R3 11LAKE ELSINOREEllis St at Sumner St92530377292017JHDRR319240.21 VacantYES ‐ Current YES ‐ City‐OwnedAvailable Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 11LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Granite St92530377273016KHDRR319240.17 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 12 Jurisdiction Name Site Address/Intersection 5 Digit ZIP CodeAssessor Parcel NumberConsolidated SitesGeneral Plan Designation (Current)Zoning Designation (Current)Minimum Density Allowed (units/acre)Max Density Allowed (units/acre)Parcel Size (Acres)Existing Use/VacancyInfrastructure Publicly-Owned Site StatusIdentified in Last/Last Two Planning Cycle(s)Lower Income CapacityModerate Income CapacityAbove Moderate Income CapacityTotal CapacityOptional Information SITE NAMELAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Granite St92530377273003KHDRR319240.34 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 7007R3 12LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Granite St92530377273015KHDRR319240.17 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 12LAKE ELSINOREFlint St/Granite St92530377273011KHDRR319240.14 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003R3 12LAKE ELSINOREPottery St bw Rupard st/Rancho 92530 377320004 HDR R3 19 24 1.21 Vacant YES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 27 0 0 27 R3 13LAKE ELSINOREJoy St/Riverside Dr92530379131005LHDRR319240.21 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 5005R3 14LAKE ELSINOREJoy St/Riverside Dr92530379131019LHDRR319243.79 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 830083 R3 14LAKE ELSINOREJoy St/Riverside Dr92530379131015LHDRR319240.35 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 8008R3 14LAKE ELSINOREJoy St/Riverside Dr92530379131006LHDRR319240.20 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004R3 14LAKE ELSINORERiverside Dr/Wagon Wheel Ln 92530379060027HDRR319244.35 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 960096 R3 15LAKE ELSINORERiverside Dr/Grand Av 92530379060022HDRR3192413.16 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 29000290 R3 16LAKE ELSINORERiverside Dr/Grand Av 92530379060005HDRR319243.47 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 760076 R3 17LAKE ELSINOREHighway 74/Crumpton Rd 92570347110088HDRR3192415.85 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 31500315 R3 18LAKE ELSINORERiverside Dr/Lake Crest Dr92530379315033RMURMU19244.96 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 11900119 RMU 1LAKE ELSINORELake Vista Dr92530379090013MRMURMU19241.29 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 310031 RMU 2LAKE ELSINORELake Vista Dr92530379090023MRMURMU19242.48 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 590059 RMU 2LAKE ELSINORELake Vista Dr92530379090012MRMURMU19241.26 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 300030 RMU 2LAKE ELSINORERiverside Dr/Lakeside HS 92530379090022RMURMU19248.25 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 19800198 RMU 3LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Mountain View Av 92530373154023NRMURMU19240.24 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 6006RMU 4LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Mountain View Av 92530373145004NRMURMU19244.44 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 10600106 RMU 4LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Mountain View Av 92530373154020NRMURMU19240.15 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004RMU 4LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Mountain View Av 92530373154025NRMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 4LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Mountain View Av 92530373154022NRMURMU19240.15 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004RMU 4LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Mountain View Av 92530373154024NRMURMU19240.14 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 4LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Mountain View Av 92530373145003NRMURMU19240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 4LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Mountain View Av 92530373154021NRMURMU19240.16 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004RMU 4LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Mountain View Av 92530373154003NRMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 4LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Mountain View Av 92530373154028NRMURMU19240.17 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004RMU 4LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Mountain View Av 92530373154030NRMURMU19240.15 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004RMU 4LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081002ORMURMU19240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081003ORMURMU19240.14 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081005ORMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081008ORMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081004ORMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081007ORMURMU19240.14 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081009ORMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081010ORMURMU19240.16 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081011ORMURMU19240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081001ORMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081006ORMURMU19240.15 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081012ORMURMU19240.08 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081014ORMURMU19240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081017ORMURMU19240.16 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081015ORMURMU19240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081016ORMURMU19240.16 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081019ORMURMU19240.16 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081020ORMURMU19240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081021ORMURMU19240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081022ORMURMU19240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081018ORMURMU19240.16 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081024ORMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081023ORMURMU19240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081025ORMURMU19240.14 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 5LAKE ELSINORECole St/Avenue 6/Bancroft Wy/A92530373081013ORMURMU19240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 5LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082010PRMURMU19240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082036PRMURMU19240.14 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082012PRMURMU19240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082014PRMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082017PRMURMU19240.15 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 4004RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082039PRMURMU19240.14 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082040PRMURMU19240.14 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082041PRMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082005PRMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082008PRMURMU19240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082023PRMURMU19240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082025PRMURMU19240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082049PRMURMU19240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082050PRMURMU19240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082011PRMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082015PRMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082018PRMURMU19240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082037PRMURMU19240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082054PRMURMU19240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082057PRMURMU19240.10 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082045PRMURMU19240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082046PRMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082048PRMURMU19240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082042PRMURMU19240.14 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082044PRMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082047PRMURMU19240.10 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082051PRMURMU19240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082056PRMURMU19240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082006PRMURMU19240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082019PRMURMU19240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082020PRMURMU19240.10 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082021PRMURMU19240.07 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082026PRMURMU19240.14 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082052PRMURMU19240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6 Jurisdiction Name Site Address/Intersection 5 Digit ZIP CodeAssessor Parcel NumberConsolidated SitesGeneral Plan Designation (Current)Zoning Designation (Current)Minimum Density Allowed (units/acre)Max Density Allowed (units/acre)Parcel Size (Acres)Existing Use/VacancyInfrastructure Publicly-Owned Site StatusIdentified in Last/Last Two Planning Cycle(s)Lower Income CapacityModerate Income CapacityAbove Moderate Income CapacityTotal CapacityOptional Information SITE NAMELAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082007PRMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082009PRMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082024PRMURMU19240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082027PRMURMU19240.14 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082043PRMURMU19240.14 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082013PRMURMU19240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082022PRMURMU19240.07 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082038PRMURMU19240.10 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082053PRMURMU19240.10 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 2002RMU 6LAKE ELSINOREFranklin St/Avenue 6/Roger St/M92530373082055PRMURMU19240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Used in Two Consecutive Prior 3003RMU 6LAKE ELSINORECole St bw Avenue 5/Avenue 6 92530373083006QRMURMU19240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available3003RMU 7LAKE ELSINORECole St bw Avenue 5/Avenue 6 92530373083004QRMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available3003RMU 7LAKE ELSINORECole St bw Avenue 5/Avenue 6 92530373083002QRMURMU19240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available3003RMU 7LAKE ELSINORECole St bw Avenue 5/Avenue 6 92530373083019QRMURMU19240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available3003RMU 7LAKE ELSINORECole St bw Avenue 5/Avenue 6 92530373083003QRMURMU19240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available3003RMU 7LAKE ELSINORECole St bw Avenue 5/Avenue 6 92530373083005QRMURMU19240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available3003RMU 7LAKE ELSINORECole St bw Avenue 5/Avenue 6 92530373083018QRMURMU19240.12 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available3003RMU 7LAKE ELSINORECole St bw Avenue 5/Avenue 6 92530373083020QRMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available3003RMU 7LAKE ELSINORECole St bw Avenue 5/Avenue 6 92530373083021QRMURMU19240.13 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available3003RMU 7LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Center St 92530373205007RRMURMU19241.44 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available340034 RMU 8LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Center St 92530373185036RRMURMU19240.60 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available140014 RMU 8LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Center St 92530373205006RRMURMU19240.66 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available160016 RMU 8LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Center St 92530373185022RRMURMU19240.64 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available150015 RMU 8LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Center St 92530373185023RRMURMU19240.40 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available100010 RMU 8LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Center St 92530373185046RRMURMU19243.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available750075 RMU 8LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Center St 92530373176019RRMURMU19240.76 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available180018 RMU 8LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Center St 92530373205004RRMURMU19241.06 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available250025 RMU 8LAKE ELSINORELakeshore Dr/Center St 92530373185037RRMURMU19240.10 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available2002RMU 8LAKE ELSINOREGraham Av/Lindsey St 92530374153015SRMURMU19240.11 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available3003RMU 9LAKE ELSINOREGraham Av/Lindsey St 92530374153016SRMURMU19240.16 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available4004RMU 9LAKE ELSINOREGraham Av/Lindsey St 92530374153017SRMURMU19240.29 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available7007RMU 9LAKE ELSINOREGrand Av/Macy St92530381030001RMURMU19242.21 VacantYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available530053 RMU 10LAKE ELSINOREAlberhill Ranch Specific Plan92530SPSP1,901 acVariousYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not Used in Prior Housing Elem187496309992 Alberhill Ranch Specific PlanLAKE ELSINOREAlberhill Villages Specific Plan92530SPSP1,375 acVariousYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not Used in Prior Housing Elem2650401113638024 Alberhill Villages Specific PlanLAKE ELSINORECanyon Creek Specific Plan92532SPSP476 acVariousYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not Used in Prior Housing Elem4110967217 Canyon Creek Specific PlanLAKE ELSINORECanyon Hills Estates Specific Plan92595SPSP246 acVariousYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not Used in Prior Housing Elem0151151302 Canyon Hills Estates Specific PlanLAKE ELSINORECanyon Hills Specific Plan92532SPSP1,969 acVariousYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not Used in Prior Housing Elem306231123 Canyon Hills Specific PlanLAKE ELSINORECape of Good Hope Specific Plan92530SPSP41 acVariousYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not Used in Prior Housing Elem0343468 Cape of Good Hope Specific PlanLAKE ELSINOREThe Diamond Specific Plan92530SPSP87 acVariousYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not Used in Prior Housing Elem3003000600 The Diamond Specific PlanLAKE ELSINOREEast Lake Specific Plan92530SPSP2,977 acVariousYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not Used in Prior Housing Elem67567501350 East Lake Specific PlanLAKE ELSINORELakeshore Village Specific Plan92530SPSP37 acVariousYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not Used in Prior Housing Elem76770153 Lakeshore Village Specific PlanLAKE ELSINOREMurdock Alberhill Specific Plan92530SPSP511 acVariousYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not Used in Prior Housing Elem2719086401819 Murdock Alberhill Specific PlanLAKE ELSINORENichols Ranch92532SPSP72.5 acVariousYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not Used in Prior Housing Elem08484168 Nichols RanchLAKE ELSINORENorth Peak Specific Plan92570SPSP1,786 acVariousYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not Used in Prior Housing Elem06006001200 North Peak Specific PlanLAKE ELSINORERamsgate Specific Plan92532SPSP1,366 acVariousYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not Used in Prior Housing Elem0474473947 Ramsgate Specific PlanLAKE ELSINORESpyglass Ranch Specific Plan92532SPSP259 acVariousYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not Used in Prior Housing Elem1455183721035 Spyglass Ranch Specific PlanLAKE ELSINORETerracina92530SPSP150.8 acVariousYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not Used in Prior Housing Elem0226226452 TerracinaLAKE ELSINORETuscany Hills Specific Plan92532SPSP1,010 acVariousYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not Used in Prior Housing Elem0404403807 Tuscany Hills Specific PlanLAKE ELSINOREVillages at Lakeshore Specific Pla92530SPSP20 acVariousYES ‐ Current NO ‐ Privately‐Owned Available Not Used in Prior Housing Elem73730146 Villages at Lakeshore Specific Plan APPENDIX C Specific Plan Land Use Maps This page left intentionally blank Specific Plan Land Use Maps 1. Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan 2. Canyon Hills Estates Specific Plan 3. Canyon Hills Specific Plan, Amendment 2 4. Canyon Hills Specific Plan, Amendment 3 5. Canyon Hills Specific Plan, Amendment 3 & 4 6. Cape of Good Hope Specific Plan 7. The Diamond Specific Plan 8. Eastlake Specific Plan 9. Lakeshore Village Specific Plan 10. Murdock Alberhill Specific Plan 11. Nichols Ranch Specific Plan 12. North Peak Specific Plan 13. Ramsgate Specific Plan 14. Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan 15. Terracina Specific Plan 16. Tuscany Hills Specific Plan Section 41.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSECONCEPTUAL LAND USE PLAN CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NOs. 3 & 4 SEPTEMBER 20208 1-1 SEPTEMBER PLANNING AREA 2B Phase: 8 Acres: 9.1 Acres Density: 6.6 DU/AC (up to 24 DU/AC) Land Use/Zoning Designation: MF2 (Multi-Family Attached Residential 2 District) Dwelling Units: 60 DU Product: Multi-Family Condominiums School District: Lake Elsinore Unified School District Design Features:  Incorporate cut slope variations.  Preserve views of river and adjacent open space, where possible.  Provide for unifying pedestrian trail system. Chapter 3: Development Plan 3-5 Figure 3-1 Land Use Plan FIGURE 3-1 Land Use Plan East Lake Specific Plan 2-16 Figure 2-1 Land Use Plan PA 8A Open Space 0.7 AC N.A.P. IN TERSTATE 15 FREE W AY MAINSTREETPA 9 Single Family 27.9 AC 125 DUs (4-8 DU/AC) PA 11 Single Family 31.6 AC 136 DUs (4-8 DU/AC) PA 13D Open Space 12.8 AC PA 4 Single Family 29.8 AC 106 DUs (4-8 DU/AC) PA 2 Single Family 22.8 AC 107 DUs (4-8 DU/AC) PA 8B Open Space 11.6 AC PA 10 Estate Lots 7.1 AC 7 DUs (0-2 DU/AC) PA 12 Courtyard Homes 11.7 AC 140 DUs (8-15 DU/AC) PA 13A Open Space 6.5 AC PA 13B Open Space 5.7 AC PA 13C Open Space 3.1 AC PA 13E Open Space 1.6 AC PA 8A Open Space 39.7 AC PA 6 Multi-Family 8.4 AC 168 DUs (15-20 DU/AC) PA 1 Courtyard Homes 10.4 AC 124 DUs (8-15 DU/AC) PA 5 Multi-Family 6.1 AC 122 DUs (15-20 DU/AC) PA 8C Open Space 4.1 AC PA 7 Park 6.5 AC PA 3 Estate Lots 0.4 AC 0 DUs (0-2 DU/AC) C A M IN O D EL N O R TE STREET"B"STRE E T "A "S T R E E T "C" S T R E ET "D "PROPOSEDELSINOREHILLSDRIVEPage 3-2 Specific Plan Land Use Plan T&B PLANNING, INC.17542 East 17th Street, Suite 100 Tustin, CA 92780 p. 714.505.6360 f.7 14.505.6361 www.tbplanning.com III. SPECIFIC PLANSPYGLASS RANCH 0 250 500 Feet FIGURE III-1 STATISTICAL SUMMARY Includes 0.7 AC Under Separate Ownership If Planning Areas 5 and 6 are not developed with Multi-Family uses, a commercial land use designation shall apply for development consistent with this Specific Plan. Proposed Water Tank Locations * ACRES DENSITY DU's Residential Estate Residential (0-2 DU/AC)7.5 0.9 7 Single-Family Residential (4-8 DU/AC)112.1 4.2 474 Courtyard Homes (8-15 DU/AC)22.1 11.9 264 Multi-Family Residential (15-20 DU/AC) *14.5 20.0 290 - Residential Subtotals 156.2 6.6 1,035 Non-Residential Parks 6.5 -- -- Open Space 85.8 -- -- Major Circulation 11.1 -- -- - Non-Residential Subtotals 103.4 -- -- PROJECT TOTALS 259.6 4.0 1,035 Note: One dwelling unit within Planning Areas 3 may be removed, resulting in 0.4 additional acres available for recreational purposes.