HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Reso No 2007-033RESOLUTION NO. 2007-33
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS OF
CONSISTENCY WITH THE MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT
CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) FOR THE LAKESHORE
PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF LAKESHORE DRIVE AND
MACHADO STREET
WHEREAS, Sean Scully of WD Partners, has filed an application with the
City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Commercial Design Review 2006-O1,
for the design and construction of a 17,272 square-foot Rite-Aid Drug store
building and a 6,105 square foot retail strip building (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Project Site is located within Redevelopment Area No. 2,
mare specifically at the northeast comer of Lakeshore Drive and Machado Street
(APN: 379-241-057 and -058) (the "Project Site"); and
WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP indicates projects which are
proposed for development in an area not covered by an MSHCP criteria cell shall
be analyzed pursuant to the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements" and the City of
Lake Elsinore shall make findings that the Project is consistent with those
requirements; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the City
Council has considered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this
item on March 13, 2007.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council has considered the Project and its
consistency with the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements" prior to making a
recommendation that the City Council adopt Findings of Consistency.
CITY COiTNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007-33
PAGE 2 OF 4
SECTION 2. That in accardance with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code
and the MSHCP, the City Council makes the following findings for MSHCP
consistency:
1. The Project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City
must make an MSHCP Consistency finding befare approval.
The Project Site is not located within a MSHCP Criteria Cell. However,
pursuant to the City's MSHCP Implementing Resolution, this Project is
required to be reviewed for consistency with the following `Plan Wide
Requirements ": Section 6.1.2 Protection of Riparian/Riverine Areas and
Vernal Pool Guidelines.
2. The Project is subject to the City's LEAP and the County's Joint Project
Review processes.
As stated above, the Project is not located within a MSHCP Criteria Cell
and therefore it was not processed through a LEAP or Joint Project Review.
3. The Project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool
Guidelines.
No riverine/riparian areas or vernal pools are present on the Project Site.
The Project is therefore consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and
Vernal Pool Guidelines set forth in Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP. No further
action Yegarding this section of the MSHCP is required.
4. The Project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant
Species Guidelines.
Per MSHCP requirements, the project is not subject to the Narrow Endemic
Plant Species Guidelines set forth in Section 6.1.3. No further action
regarding this section of the MSHCP is required.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007-33
PAGE 3 OF 4
5. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and
Procedures.
Per MSHCP requirements, the project is not subject to Criteria Area Species
Survey Area Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.3.2 of the MSHCP. No
further action regarding this section of the MSHCP is required.
6. The Project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines.
The project is surrounded by existing development or graded parcels
planned for development. Therefore, the Urban/Wildlands Interface
Guidelines set forth in Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP are not applicable to the
project. No further action regarding this section of the MSHCP is required.
7. The Project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
There are no resources existing on Project Site that would be subject to the
requirements of Vegetation Mapping set forth in Section 6.3.1 of the
MSHCP. No further action regarding this section of the MSHCP is
required.
8. The Project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines.
A.r stated above, the Project is surrounded by existing development.
Therefore, the Fuels Management Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.4 of
the MSHCP are inapplicable. No further action regarding this section of
the MSHCP is required.
9. The Project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local
Development Mitigation Fee.
The developer will be required to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development
Mitigation Fee.
lO.The Project is consistent with the MSHCP.
The Project is consistent with all applicable provisions of the MSHCP. No
further actions related to the MSHCP are required.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007-33
PAGE 4 OF 4
SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13t" day of March 2007, by
the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Auckley, xickman, xelley
Schiffner, Magee
NOES: COLJNCILMEMBERS: tvone
ABSENT: COLJNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COI.JNCILMEMBERS: None
ATTEST:
.~/~/C.~ ~,~ e ~
Michelle Soto, Interim City Clerk
City of Lake Elsinore
City Attorney
City of Lake Elsinore