Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem No. 13 - NOD PA No. 2017-62 Imperial Stations City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore,CA 92530 CITY OF OF www.lake-elsinore.org LAKE LSINOR-E DREAM City Council Agenda Report File Number: ID# 22-116 Agenda Date: 3/22/2022 Version: 1 Status:Approval Final In Control: City Council/Successor Agency File Type: Council Consent Calendar Agenda Number: 13) Notice of Decision - Planning Commission Approval of Planning Application No. 2017-62 (Imperial Stations) Requesting to Construct a New 3,000 sq. ft. Convenience Store with a 4,400 sq.ft. Fueling Canopy and a 5,739 sq. ft. Self-serve Carwash Receive and File the Notice of Decision for Planning Application No. 2017-62 acted on by the Planning Commission on March 1, 2022. The Planning Commission, by a 3-0 vote.- 1. Adopted A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-10 TO ESTABLISH A 3,000 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE WITH A 4,400 SQUARE FOOT FUELING CANOPY AND A 5,739 SQUARE FOOT SELF-SERVE CARWASH LOCATED AT APN: 363-172-016; and 2. Adopted A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2020-09 PROVIDING BUILDING DESIGN AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS FOR A 3,000 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE WITH A 4,400 SQUARE FOOT FUELING CANOPY AND A 5,739 SQUARE FOOT SELF-SERVE CARWASH LOCATED AT APN: 363-172-016. City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 311712022 CITY OF ��� LADE _ LSIN0P,,E %` DREAM EXTREME,.. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Jason Simpson, City Manager Prepared by: Kevin Beery, Associate Planner Date: March 22, 2022 Subject: Notice of Decision— Planning Commission Approval of Planning Application No. 2017-62 (Imperial Stations) requesting to Construct a New 3,000 sq. ft. Convenience Store with a 4,400 sq.ft. Fueling Canopy and a 5,739 sq.ft. Self- serve Carwash Applicant: David Berri, Imperial Stations, Inc. Recommendation Receive and File the Notice of Decision for Planning Application No. 2017-62 acted on by the Planning Commission on March 1, 2022. The Planning Commission by a 3-0 vote: 1. Adopted A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-10 TO ESTABLISH A 3,000 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE WITH A 4,400 SQUARE FOOT FUELING CANOPY AND A 5,739 SQUARE FOOT SELF-SERVE CARWASH LOCATED AT APN: 363-172-016; and, 2. Adopted A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2020-09 PROVIDING BUILDING DESIGN AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS FOR A 3,000 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE WITH A 4,400 SQUARE FOOT FUELING CANOPY AND A 5,739 SQUARE FOOT SELF-SERVE CARWASH LOCATED AT APN: 363-172-016. The Planning Commission's decision is final and no action by the City Council is required unless the City Council by majority vote elects to review and reconsider the Planning Commission's decision by ordering the matter set for a future noticed public hearing according to Section 17.410.110.E of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), or the applicant or an interested person files a complete appeal application within 15 days of this notice appearing on the City Council's agenda. Background Planning Application No. 2017-62 (Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-10 and Commercial Design Review No. 2020-09) proposes to establish a new 3,000 sq. ft. convenience store with the concurrent sale of beer and wine (Type 20 ABC), a 4,400 sq. ft. canopy with 18 fueling stations, Page 1 of 2 PA 2017-62 (Imperial Stations) City Council Receive & File Report: 03/22/2022 Page 2 of 2 and a 5,739 sq. ft. self-serve carwash on an approximately 1.8-acre site. The project will provide 49 parking spaces that include 22 standard spaces, two (2) accessible spaces, and 25 vacuum spaces. The proposed project is located south of Diamond Drive, east of Mission Trail, and west of Casino Drive (APN: 363-172-016). At the March 1, 2022, Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission accepted public oral and written testimony that included two letters from Todd Frahm, an attorney representing the adjacent preschool, expressing concerns with the proposed environmental determination (attached as Exhibit B). The Planning Commission also received a letter from the applicant's counsel responding to the concerns raised by Frahm (attached as Exhibit C). During the public hearing,the owner of the adjacent preschool spoke in opposition to the project based on concerns regarding the submitted site plan, the proposed environmental determination, and lack of buffering/separation between the proposed car wash and the preschool. In response to these concerns, the applicant provided an updated site plan exhibit (attached as Exhibit D) depicting both the site in relation to the preschool and the proposed grade difference between the two properties. Furthermore, the applicant's technical experts testified how the project would have not significantly impacted nearby sensitive receptors, including the preschool, because the project does not have the potential to exceed applicable air quality and noise standards. The Planning Commission added the following condition of approval: • To achieve varied roof planes, a hipped or mansard Spanish tile roof shall be provided on street-facing facades of the proposed convenience store building. Building elevations and a roof plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval before building permit issuance. The Planning Commission voted 3-0 to approve the project. Fiscal Impact The time and costs related to processing this application have been covered by fees paid for by the applicant. No General Fund budgets have been allocated or used in the processing of this application. The approval of the Project does not fiscally impact the City's General Fund. Mitigation Measures to protect the City fiscally have already been included in the Conditions of Approval. Exhibits A— Planning Commission Staff Report B — Letters from Todd Frahm C — Letter from Marc Collins D — Site Plan Exhibit Page 2 of 2 City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore,CA 92530 CITY OF OF www.lake-elsinore.org LAKE LSINOR-E DREAM City Council Agenda Report File Number: ID# 22-086 Agenda Date: 3/1/2022 Version: 1 Status:Approval Final In Control: Planninq Commission File Type: Planning Public Hearing Agenda Number: 1) Planning Application No. 2017-62 (Imperial Stations) Request to Construct a New 3,000 sq. ft. Convenience Store with a 4,400 sq. ft. Fueling Canopy and a 5,739 sq. ft. Self-serve Carwash Adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-10 TO ESTABLISH A 3,000 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE WITH A 4,400 SQUARE FOOT FUELING CANOPY AND A 5,739 SQUARE FOOT SELF-SERVE CARWASH LOCATED AT APN: 363-172-016; and Adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2020-09 PROVIDING BUILDING DESIGN AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS FOR A 3,000 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE WITH A 4,400 SQUARE FOOT FUELING CANOPY AND A 5,739 SQUARE FOOT SELF-SERVE CARWASH LOCATED AT APN: 363-172-016. City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 31812022 CITY OF ��� LADE 0LSINORE %` DREAM EXTREME,.. REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION To: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: Damaris Abraham, Acting Planning Manager Prepared by: Kevin Beery, Associate Planner Date: March 1, 2022 Subject: Planning Application No. 2017-62 (Imperial Stations) Request to Construct a New 3,000 sq. ft. Convenience Store with a 4,400 sq. ft. Fueling Canopy and a 5,739 sq. ft. Self-serve Carwash Applicant: David Berri, Imperial Stations, Inc. Recommendation 1. Adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-10 TO ESTABLISH A 3,000 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE WITH A 4,400 SQUARE FOOT FUELING CANOPY AND A 5,739 SQUARE FOOT SELF-SERVE CARWASH LOCATED AT APN: 363-172-016; and 2. Adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2020-09 PROVIDING BUILDING DESIGN AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS FOR A 3,000 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE WITH A 4,400 SQUARE FOOT FUELING CANOPY AND A 5,739 SQUARE FOOT SELF-SERVE CARWASH LOCATED AT APN: 363-172-016. Project Location The proposed project is located south of Diamond Drive, east of Mission Trail, and west of Casino Drive (APN: 363-172-016). Environmental Setting EXISTING GENERAL PLAN ZONING LA Project Site Vacant Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) ` Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) North Commercial Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) South Commercial Commercial Mixed Use CMU Commercial Mixed Use CMU East Commercial General Commercial (GC) General Commercial (C-2) West Commercial Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) Table 1: Environmental Setting PA 2017-62 (Imperial Stations) PC: March 1, 2022 Page 2 of 6 Protect Description Planning Application No. 2017-62 (Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-10 and Commercial Design Review No. 2020-09) proposes to establish a new 3,000 sq. ft. convenience store with the concurrent sale of beer and wine (Type 20 ABC), a 4,400 sq. ft. canopy with 18 fueling stations, and a 5,739 sq. ft. self-serve carwash on an approximately 1.8-acre site. The project will provide 49 parking spaces that include 22 standard spaces, two (2) accessible spaces, and 25 vacuum spaces. Architecture and Treatments The convenience store building will be a single-story building with a maximum height of 28'-6".The carwash building will be a two-story building with a maximum height of 27'-6". Each building would incorporate architectural elements (such as parapets) of different heights that would provide for a varying roofline. The buildings would be constructed of gray and light gray smooth finish stucco, dark brown trims, and red accent paint. The buildings would incorporate decorative architectural features including awnings and trellis features. Aluminum storefront windows with reflective glazing will be utilized on the buildings to create a uniform appearance. The canopy for the fueling station will be 19'-0" in height and will have white canopy with gray and red base designed to match the convenience store building. Landscaping The proposed landscaping plan has been designed to complement the architectural style for the proposed buildings. The project site would include approximately 11,944 sq. ft. of landscaping, representing 15 percent of the site. Landscaping would be provided in the street setback and interior property line setbacks along the perimeter of the project site, as well as around the buildings and parking spaces. Trees and a variety of shrubs are proposed to be utilized for landscape massing, accent plantings, groundcover, and screening. Grading Earthwork for the site is anticipated to require 19,770 cubic yards of cut, 895 cubic yards of fill, and 18,875 cubic yards of export. Upon completion of grading activities, the improved project site pad will generally be at or up to three feet above Mission Trail street grade. A retaining wall ranging in height from 12 feet to 20 feet will be constructed along Casino Drive on the project's easterly boundary. Site Access and Street Improvements Vehicular access to the project site would be provided by two (2) driveways (one for the gas station and convenience store and one for the carwash) located along Mission Trail. No driveway access will be provided on Casino Drive. Mission Trail is an Urban Arterial as shown on the General Plan. The applicant is required to dedicate approximately 10 feet for a total right-of-way of 60 feet wide from the centerline to the project property line. Existing street improvements will remain on Mission Trail, with the exception of the driveway approaches. PA 2017-62 (Imperial Stations) PC: March 1, 2022 Page 3 of 6 Casino Drive is a Major Arterial as shown on the General Plan. The applicant is required to dedicate approximately 10 feet for a total right-of-way of 50 feet wide from the centerline to the project property line. The applicant is required to pay in lieu fees for future half-width improvements along Casino Drive. Analysis General Plan Consistency The project has a General Plan Land Use designation Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) and is located within the Lake Elsinore Hills District. The CMU Land Use designation allows a mix of residential and non-residential uses within a single proposed development area, with an emphasis on retail, service, civic and professional office uses. The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for non- residential uses is 0.80:1 and a minimum of 50% of the total floor area shall be commercial uses. The project is proposing to develop a convenience store with a gas station and a self-serve carwash with 0.17 FAR with the entire project site dedicated to a commercial use. Therefore, the project is consistent with the General Plan. Municipal Code Consistency The current zoning for the subject site is Commercial Mixed Use (CMU). Per Section 17.134.020 (Table of land uses and glossary/definitions) of the CMU zone, convenience stores are permitted uses and carwashes are permitted uses subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Per Section 17.134.020 of the CMU zone, the Community Development Director has deemed Gasoline Dispensing Establishments to be in accord with the purpose of the CMU zone and having characteristics similar to those uses listed in Section 17.134.020 (Table of land uses and glossary/definitions) as requiring a Conditional Use Permit. Staff has reviewed the proposed project with respect to the relevant development standards as identified in the CMU zone and Section 17.112.090 (Gasoline dispensing establishments) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and has detailed the requirements and the proposed development standards as follows: Development Standard Required Proposed Standard (CMU) >50% net lot size 100% FAR 0.8:1 0.17 Setbacks: Street Front (Mission Trail) 10'-01, 10'-01, Street Front (Casino) 10'-01, 10'-0" Interior lot lines No Minimum - Fueling Canopy 20'-0" 40'-0" Fueling Pumps 30'-0" 45'-0" Building Height Varied Rooflines 28'-6", 27'-6" & 19'-0" Landscape improvement: Adjacent to Street 10'-01, 10'-01, Table 2: Development Standards The project complies with the onsite parking standards listed in Section 17.134.070 (Parking in the CMU district) of the LEMC. Per Section 17.134.070, no off-street parking is required for nonresidential uses unless the use exceeds 3,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area, in which case one PA 2017-62 (Imperial Stations) PC: March 1, 2022 Page 4 of 6 off-street parking space is required for every 250 square feet beyond 3,000 sq. ft. The project will provide 49 parking spaces, including two (2) accessible spaces and 25 vacuum parking spaces. The proposed parking would exceed the minimum 40 parking spaces required for the site per LEMC as well as the current California Building Code requirements for accessible vehicle parking spaces. The architectural design of the proposed building complies with the Nonresidential Development Standards (Chapter 17.112) of the LEMC. The architecture of the building has been designed to achieve harmony and compatibility with surrounding area. The colors and materials proposed will assist in blending the architecture into the existing landscape and are compatible with other colors and materials used on other properties near the project site. The proposed landscaping improvements serve to enhance the building designs and soften portions of building elevations, provide shade and break-up expanses of pavement. The Design Review Committee that includes staff from Planning, Building and Safety, Fire, and Engineering have reviewed the proposed Project, and have conditioned the Project to mitigate any potential concerns. Traffic A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) dated June 4, 2021 was prepared for the proposed project by STE to evaluate the proposed project's impacts on traffic. The TIA found that no significant direct impacts are projected in the study area as a result of the proposed project. The TIA showed that the study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS). The proposed project will participate in the cost of off-site improvements through payment of Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) and Traffic Impact Fee (TIF)fees. The project's contribution to these transportation impact fee programs should be sufficient to address the project's fair share towards mitigation measures designed to alleviate cumulative project impacts. A site-specific Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)Analysis was prepared for the project. As outlined in the City's adopted TIA Guidelines, land use projects serving the local community less than 50,000 square feet may be presumed to have less than a significant impact on VMT and does not require additional VMT analysis. It is anticipated that the proposed project will serve local residents within the vicinity providing enhanced convenience. This additional convenience would reduce the need for residents to travel longer distances. Therefore, trip lengths within the region would be reduced, and vehicle travel would decrease. Thus, the project is considered a local serving retail and will not have a significant VMT impact. Noise A Noise Impact Study dated November 2021 was prepared for the proposed project by LSA to evaluate the potential noise impacts for the proposed project. The study assessed the short-term construction noise impacts as well as operational noise impacts resulting from the project which include on-site noise sources such as car wash equipment,vacuum stations, and traffic generated noise. The study found that the project would meet the noise regulations and standards of the LEMC Section 17.176 (Noise Ordinance). To further ensure that construction and operational activities do not disrupt the adjacent land use the study recommended additional conditions of approval (COA No. 12). Although these conditions are not required to mitigate any significant impacts, these conditions have been imposed to minimize noise levels during project construction. PA 2017-62 (Imperial Stations) PC: March 1, 2022 Page 5 of 6 Air Quality An Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis dated November 2021 was prepared for the proposed project by LSA to evaluate the potential air quality impacts for the proposed project. The study assessed the air quality impacts resulting from the project construction and operation, in addition to evaluate the project's compliance with applicable criteria pollutant thresholds established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD). The study found that the project would not exceed regional and localized construction and operational emission SCAQMD daily significance thresholds and that the project does not have the potential to expose nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Water Quality A Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan (FWQMP-2020-00007) dated April 2, 2020 (Revised October 13, 2020) has been prepared for the project to address the increase in polluted runoff that would occur from the proposed project. The onsite stormwater runoff will be collected by an onsite biofiltration system where it would pass through a filter and then be temporarily retained in the soil media. The plants and biological activity in the root zone would then function to take up pollutants and runoff, thus filtering the water before it is released into the storm drain system that eventually leads to Lake Elsinore. The SWPPP must also include construction-phase BMPs to protect against stormwater runoff. Through implementation of both the WQMP and SWPPP BMPs, along with regulatory compliance, the Project would meet applicable standards and discharge regulations. Condition Use Permit Findings As noted above, carwashes and gasoline dispensing establishments are conditionally permitted uses requiring issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. LEMC Section 17.415.070( c) provides that the Commission must consider whether the purposed use meets the following criteria and make findings to that effect before granting a Conditional Use Permit: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City. 3. That the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required by this title. 4. That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use. PA 2017-62 (Imperial Stations) PC: March 1, 2022 Page 6 of 6 5. That in approving the subject use at the specific location, there will be no adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted and normal use thereof. 6. That adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to subsection (B) of this section have been incorporated into the approval of the conditional use permit to ensure that the use continues in a manner envisioned by these findings for the term of the use. Environmental Determination The proposed project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§21000 et seq.: "CEQA")and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. §§ 15000 et seq.) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 In-Fill Development Projects. As described in the attached Class 32 Categorical Exemption Checklist (Exhibit D), the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and policies, as well as zoning designation and regulations, and is within the City's boundaries on a site less than five acres surrounded by urban uses, the subject property has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, and approval of the project will not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality and the project is adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Exhibits A— CUP Resolution B — CDR Resolution C — Conditions of Approval D — Class 32 Categorical Exemption Checklist E —Vicinity Map F —Aerial Map G — Design Review Package RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-10 TO ESTABLISH A 3,000 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE WITH A 4,400 SQUARE FOOT FUELING CANOPY AND A 5,739 SQUARE FOOT SELF-SERVE CARWASH LOCATED AT APN: 363-172-016 Whereas, David Berri, Imperial Stations, Inc. has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore (City) requesting approval of Planning Application No. 2017-62 (Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-10 and Commercial Design Review No. 2020-09) proposing to establish a new 3,000 sq. ft. convenience store with the concurrent sale of beer and wine (Type 20 ABC), a 4,400 sq. ft. canopy with 18 fueling stations, and a 5,739 sq. ft. self-serve carwash on an approximately 1.8- acre site. The project will provide 49 parking spaces that include 22 standard spaces, two (2) accessible spaces, and 25 vacuum spaces. The proposed project is located south of Diamond Drive, east of Mission Trail, and west of Casino Drive (APN: 363-172-016); and, Whereas, Section 6.0 of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) requires that all discretionary projects within a MSHCP Criteria Cell undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process (LEAP) and Joint Project Review (JPR) process to analyze the scope of the proposed development and establish a building envelope that is consistent with the MSHCP criteria; and, Whereas, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP further requires that the City adopt consistency findings demonstrating that the proposed discretionary entitlement complies with the MSHCP Criteria Cell, and the MSHCP goals and objectives; and, Whereas, Section 17.415.070.A of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) provides that certain uses have operational characteristics that, depending on the location and design of the use, may have the potential to negatively impact adjoining properties, businesses or residents and therefore are permitted subject to the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit, which allows the City to comprehensively review and approve the use; and, Whereas, pursuant to Section 17.415.070.B of the LEMC, the Planning Commission (Commission) has been delegated with the responsibility of reviewing and approving, conditionally approving, or denying Conditional Use Permits; and, Whereas, on March 1, 2022, at a duly noticed Public Hearing, the Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Commission has considered the project and has found it acceptable. Section 2: That in accordance with the MSHCP, the Commission makes the following findings for MSHCP consistency: PC Reso. No. 2022- Page 2 of 4 1. The project is not subject to the City's LEAP and the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority's (RCA) JPR processes as it is not located within a Criteria Cell 2. The project site has been previously disturbed and has been repeatedly been disked over the years for weed abatement. Due to the numerous disturbances of the subject site, there is little habitat value for the MSHCP and other special status species. As such, the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP are not applicable. 3. The project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines and the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures because the project is not located within any Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Areas or Critical Species Survey Areas. 4. The project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines because the project site is not within or adjacent to any MSHCP Criteria Cell or conservation areas. 5. The project has been conditioned to pay any applicable MSHCP Local Development Mitigation fees. Section 3: The Commission finds that the proposed project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. §§ 15000 et seq.) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 In-Fill Development Projects. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and policies, as well as zoning designation and regulations, and is within the City's boundaries on a site less than five acres surrounded by urban uses. The subject property has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. Approval of the project will not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality and the project is adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Section 4: That in accordance with LEMC Section 17.415.070.C. Findings, the Commission makes the following findings regarding Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-10: 1. That the proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the zoning district in which the site is located. The project has a General Plan Land Use designation Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) and is located within the Lake Elsinore Hills District. The CMU Land Use designation allows a mix of residential and non-residential uses within a single proposed development area, with an emphasis on retail, service, civic and professional office uses. The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for non-residential uses is 0.80:1 and a minimum of 50% of the total floor area shall be commercial uses. The Project is proposing to develop a convenience store with a gas station and a self-serve carwash with 0.17 FAR with the entire project site dedicated to a commercial use. The current zoning for the subject site is Commercial Mixed Use (CMU). Per Section 17.134.020 (Table of land uses and glossary/definitions) of the CMU zone, convenience stores are permitted uses and carwashes are permitted uses subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Per Section 17.134.020 of the CMU zone, the Community Development Director has deemed Gasoline Dispensing Establishments to be in accord with the purpose of the CMU zone and having characteristics similar to those uses listed in Section 17.134.020(Table of land uses and glossary/definitions) as requiring a Conditional Use Permit. Further, the proposed commercial project will assist in achieving PC Reso. No. 2022- Page 3 of 4 the development of a well-balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses. 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City. The proposed use does not propose either directly or indirectly any detrimental effects to the existing surrounding community. The project has been conditioned as such to avoid any possible negative impacts associated with the proposed project. 3. The Site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required by this title. The proposed use has been analyzed and staff has determined that the proposed use meets all applicable sections of the LEMC and will complement the existing uses, based on the submitted plans and the conditions of approval imposed on the project. 4. The Site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use. The project would include right-of-way dedication along Mission Trail and Casino Drive to their ultimate half-section width and constructing frontage improvements in accordance with City's Engineering Department. These improvements will be sufficient for the type and quantity of traffic generated by the proposed use. 5. In approving the subject use at the specific location, there will be no adverse effect on abutting properties or the permitted and normal use thereof. The Conditional Use Permit has been thoroughly reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City departments thereby eliminating the potential for any adverse effects. 6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to LEMC 17.415.070.13, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this chapter and the planning district in which the site is located. Pursuant to Section 17.415.070.8 of the LEMC, the project was considered by the Planning Commission at a duly noticed Public Hearing on March 1, 2022, appropriate and applicable conditions of approval have been included to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Section 5: Based upon the evidence presented, both written and testimonial, and the above findings, the Commission hereby finds that the project is consistent with the MSHCP. Section 6: Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and the Conditions of Approval imposed upon the project, the Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-10. PC Reso. No. 2022- Page 4 of 4 Section 7: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Passed and Adopted on this 1 st day of March, 2022. John Gray, Chairman Attest: Damaris Abraham Acting Planning Manager STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, Damaris Abraham, Acting Planning Manager of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2022-_was adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, at a regular meeting held on March 1, 2022 and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Damaris Abraham Acting Planning Manager RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2020-09 PROVIDING BUILDING DESIGN AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS FOR A 3,000 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE WITH A 4,400 SQUARE FOOT FUELING CANOPY AND A 5,739 SQUARE FOOT SELF-SERVE CARWASH LOCATED AT APN: 363-172-016 Whereas, David Berri, Imperial Stations, Inc. has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore (City) requesting approval of Planning Application No. 2017-62 (Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-10 and Commercial Design Review No. 2020-09) proposing to establish a new 3,000 sq. ft. convenience store with the concurrent sale of beer and wine (Type 20 ABC), a 4,400 sq. ft. canopy with 18 fueling stations, and a 5,739 sq. ft. self-serve carwash on an approximately 1.8- acre site. The project will provide 49 parking spaces that include 22 standard spaces, two (2) accessible spaces, and 25 vacuum spaces. The proposed project is located south of Diamond Drive, east of Mission Trail, and west of Casino Drive (APN: 363-172-016); and, Whereas, the proposed project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Publ. Res. Code §§21000 et seq.:"CEQA") and CEQA Guidelines (14. Cal. Code Regs §§15000 et seq.), specifically pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32 — In-Fill Development Projects); and, Whereas, Section 6.0 of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) requires that all discretionary projects within a MSHCP Criteria Cell undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process (LEAP) and Joint Project Review (JPR) process to analyze the scope of the proposed development and establish a building envelope that is consistent with the MSHCP criteria; and, Whereas, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP further requires that the City adopt consistency findings demonstrating that the proposed discretionary entitlement complies with the MSHCP Criteria Cell, and the MSHCP goals and objectives; and, Whereas, pursuant to Section 17.415.050 (Major Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the Planning Commission (Commission) has been delegated with the responsibility of reviewing and approving, conditionally approving, or denying design review applications; and, Whereas, on March 1, 2022 at a duly noticed Public Hearing the Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Commission has reviewed and analyzed the proposed project pursuant to the California Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 59000 et seq.), the Lake Elsinore General Plan (GP), and the LEMC and finds and determines that the proposed project is consistent with the requirements of California Planning and Zoning Law and with the goals and policies of the GP and the LEMC. PC Reso. No. 2022- Page 2 of 4 Section 2: That in accordance with the MSHCP, the Commission makes the following findings for MSHCP consistency: 1. The project is not subject to the City's LEAP and the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority's (RCA) JPR processes as it is not located within a Criteria Cell 2. The project site has been previously disturbed and has been repeatedly been disked over the years for weed abatement. Due to the numerous disturbances of the subject site, there is little habitat value for the MSHCP and other special status species. As such, the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP are not applicable. 3. The project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines and the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures because the project is not located within any Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Areas or Critical Species Survey Areas. 4. The project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines because the project site is not within or adjacent to any MSHCP Criteria Cell or conservation areas. 5. The project has been conditioned to pay any applicable MSHCP Local Development Mitigation fees. Section 3: The Commission finds that the proposed project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. §§ 15000 et seq.) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 In-Fill Development Projects. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and policies, as well as zoning designation and regulations, and is within the City's boundaries on a site less than five acres surrounded by urban uses. The subject property has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. Approval of the Project will not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality and the project is adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Section 4: That in accordance with Section 17.415.050.E of the LEMC, the Commission makes the following findings regarding Commercial Design Review No. 2020-09: 1. The Project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the zoning district in which the project is located. The project has a General Plan Land Use designation Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) and is located within the Lake Elsinore Hills District. The CMU Land Use designation allows a mix of residential and non-residential uses within a single proposed development area, with an emphasis on retail, service, civic and professional office uses. The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for non-residential uses is 0.80:1 and a minimum of 50% of the total floor area shall be commercial uses. The Project is proposing to develop a convenience store with a gas station and a self-serve carwash with 0.17 FAR with the entire project site dedicated to a commercial use. The current zoning for the subject site is Commercial Mixed Use (CMU). Per Section 17.134.020 (Table of land uses and glossary/definitions) of the CMU zone, convenience stores are permitted uses and carwashes are permitted uses subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Per Section 17.134.020 of the CMU zone, the Community Development Director has deemed Gasoline Dispensing Establishments to be in accord with the purpose of the CMU zone and having characteristics similar to those PC Reso. No. 2022- Page 3 of 4 uses listed in Section 17.134.020(Table of land uses and glossary/definitions)as requiring a Conditional Use Permit. Further, the proposed commercial project will assist in achieving the development of a well-balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses. 2. The Project complies with the design directives contained in the LEMC and all applicable provisions of the LEMC. The project is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments. The architectural design of the proposed building complies with the Nonresidential Development Standards (Chapter 17.112) of the LEMC. The architecture has been designed to achieve harmony and compatibility with the surrounding area. The colors and materials proposed will assist in blending the architecture into the existing landscape and are compatible with other colors and materials used on other properties near the Project site. In addition, safe and efficient circulation has been achieved onsite. 3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.415.050.G.3 of the LEMC, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the Project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Section 17.415.050. Pursuant to Section 17.415.050.E of the LEMC, the project was considered by the Planning Commission at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on August 17, 2021. The project, as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City divisions, departments, and agencies, to ensure that the project will be developed in accordance with Section 17.415.050 of the LEMC and the provisions of the Lake Elsinore Hills Planning District. Section 5: Based upon the evidence presented, both written and testimonial, and the above findings, the Commission hereby finds that the project is consistent with the MSHCP. Section 6: Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and the Conditions of Approval imposed upon the Project, the Commission hereby approves Commercial Design Review No. 2020-09. Section 7: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Passed and Adopted on this 1 st day of March, 2022. John Gray, Chairman Attest: Damaris Abraham Acting Planning Manager PC Reso. No. 2022- Page 4 of 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, Damaris Abraham, Acting Planning Manager of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2022-_was adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, at a regular meeting held on March 1, 2022 and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Damaris Abraham Acting Planning Manager CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PROJECT: PA 2017-62/CUP 2020-10/CDR 2020-09 PROJECT NAME: Imperial Stations PROJECT LOCATION: APN: 363-172-016 APPROVAL DATE: EFFECTIVE DATE: EXPIRATION DATE: GENERAL 1. Planning Application No. 2017-62 (Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-10 and Commercial Design Review No. 2020-09) proposes to establish a new 3,000 sq. ft. convenience store with the concurrent sale of beer and wine (Type 20 ABC), a 4,400 sq. ft. canopy with 18 fueling stations, and a 5,739 sq. ft. self-serve carwash on an approximately 1.8-acre site. The project will provide 49 parking spaces that include 22 standard spaces, two (2) accessible spaces, and 25 vacuum spaces. The proposed project is located south of Diamond Drive, east of Mission Trail, and west of Casino Drive (APN: 363-172-016). 2. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, Agents, and its Consultants (Indemnitees) from any claim, action, or proceeding against the Indemnitees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning approval, implementation and construction of CUP 2020-10 and CDR 2020-09, which action is bought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and/or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code Section 21167, including the approval, extension or modification of CUP 2020-10 and CDR 2020- 09 or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant's indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys' fees, penalties and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. The City will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City. If the project is challenged in court, the City and the applicant shall enter into formal defense and indemnity agreement, consistent with this condition. 3. Within 30 days of project approval, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. PLANNING DIVISION 4. Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-10 shall lapse and become void two years following the date on which the conditional use permit became effective, unless one of the following: (1) prior to the expiration of two years, a building permit related to the conditional use permit is issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion; or (2) prior to the expiration of two years, the applicant has applied for and has been granted an extension of the conditional use permit approval pursuant to subsections (a), (b), and (c) of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Section 17.415.070.D.2. Subject to the provisions of LEMC Section 17.415.070.1, a conditional use permit granted pursuant to the provisions of Applicant's Initials: Page 1 of 17 PA 2017-62/CUP 2020-10/CDR 2020-09 PC: March 1, 2022 Conditions of Approval CC: TBD this section shall run with the land and shall continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the site or structure, which was the subject of the Conditional Use Permit application. 5. Commercial Design Review No. 2020-09 shall lapse and become void two years following the date on which the design review became effective, unless one of the following: (1) prior to the expiration of two years, a building permit related to the design review is issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion; or (2) prior to the expiration of two years, the applicant has applied for and has been granted an extension of the design review approval pursuant to subsections (1) and (2) of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Section 17.415.050.1.1. Notwithstanding conditions to the contrary, a design review granted pursuant to LEMC Section 17.415.050.1.2 shall run with the land for this two- year period, subject to any approved extensions, and shall continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the site, which was the subject of the design review application. 6. An application for modification, expansion or other change in a Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed according to the provisions of the Section 17.415.070 of the LEMC, in a similar manner as a new application 7. If operation of this use triggers concerns related to parking, noise, traffic, or other impacts, at the discretion of the Community Development Director, this Conditional Use Permit may be referred back to the Planning Commission for subsequent review at a Public Hearing. If necessary, the Commission may modify or add conditions of approval to mitigate such impacts, or may revoke said Conditional Use Permit. 8. All Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on page one of building plans prior to their acceptance by the Building and Safety Division, Community Development Department. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 9. All future development proposals shall be reviewed by the City on a project-by-project basis. If determined necessary by the Community Development Director or designee, additional environmental analysis will be required. 10. Any proposed minor revisions to approved plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director or designee. Any proposed substantial revisions to the approved plans shall be reviewed according to the provisions of the Municipal Code in a similar manner as a new application. Grading plan revisions shall be reviewed by the City Engineer. 11. The applicant shall provide all project-related on-site and off-site improvements as required by these Conditions of Approval. 12. Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance (LEMC Chapter 17.176) shall be satisfied during all site preparation and construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and shall cease no later than 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Only finish work and similar interior construction may be conducted on Saturdays and may commence no earlier than 8:00 am and shall cease no later than 4:00 p.m. Construction activity shall not take place on Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. The Project shall also comply with the following requirements to minimize noise levels during from construction activities: Applicant's Initials: Page 2 of 17 PA 2017-62/CUP 2020-10/CDR 2020-09 PC: March 1, 2022 Conditions of Approval CC: TBD a. The construction contractor shall erect a minimum 14-foot high temporary construction barrier to shield the playground associated with the preschool from mobile construction equipment and a minimum 8 ft high portable temporary construction barrier immediately to the southeast for all onsite stationary construction equipment. The barrier shall be continuous with no gaps or holes and may be any material that has a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 28. b. The construction contractor shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards. c. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the Project site whenever feasible. d. The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and the noise-sensitive receptors nearest the Project site during all Project construction whenever feasible. 13. No individual signs are approved as part of this approval. The applicant or designee shall submit an application for a sign permit, pay appropriate fees and receive approval from the Community Development Department for any sign(s) installed at the project site. 14. In accordance with Section 17.112.090.0. of the LEMC, establishments engaged in the concurrent sale of motor vehicle fuel with alcoholic beverages shall abide by the following requirements: a. No beer or wine shall be displayed within five feet of the cash register or the front door. b. No advertisement of alcoholic beverages shall be displayed at motor fuel islands. c. No sale of alcoholic beverages shall be made from a drive-in window. d. No display or sale of beer or wine shall be made from an ice tub. e. No beer or wine advertising shall be located on motor fuel islands and no self-illuminated advertising for beer or wine shall be located on buildings or windows. f. Employees on duty between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. shall be at least 21 years of age to sell beer and wine. 15. Graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. 16. All materials and colors depicted on the approved plans shall be used. If the applicant wishes to modify any of the approved materials or colors depicted on the plans, the applicant shall submit a proposal setting forth the modifications for review by the Community Development Director or his designee 17. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 18. If any of the conditions of approval set forth herein fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits, deny revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation Applicant's Initials: Page 3 of 17 PA 2017-62/CUP 2020-10/CDR 2020-09 PC: March 1, 2022 Conditions of Approval CC: TBD Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits/Building Permits 19. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay Development Impact Fees (DIF)and MSHCP Fees per LEMC Section 16.85, at the rate in effect at the time of payment. 20. All roof mounted or ground support air conditioning units or other mechanical equipment incidental to development shall be architecturally screened or shielded by landscaping so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Any roof mounted central swamp coolers shall also be screened, and the Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permit shall approve screening plan. 21. The project shall meet all requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). The applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to the EVMWD and shall incorporate all district conditions and standards. 22. The property address (in numerals at least six inches high) shall be displayed near the entrance and be easily visible from the front of the subject property and public right-of-way. 23. The applicant shall construct trash enclosure(s) with a decorative roof to match the colors, materials and design of the project architecture. 24. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 25. Prior to issuance of a building permit, one (1) set of the Final Landscaping / Irrigation Detail Plans along with a digital copy (i.e. PDF format) shall be submitted to the Community Development Department with appropriate fees, for review and approval by the Community Development Director or designee. a. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with 50% plant coverage using a drip irrigation method. b. All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six inch (6") high and six inch (6")wide concrete curb. Runoff shall be allowed from paved areas into landscape areas. C. Planting within fifteen feet(15')of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than twenty- four inches (24"). d. Landscape planters shall be planted with an appropriate parking lot shade tree pursuant to the LEMC and Landscape Design Guidelines. e. No required tree planting bed shall be less than 5 feet wide. f. Root barriers shall be installed for all trees planted within 10 feet of hardscape areas to include sidewalks. g. Any transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan and screened as part of the landscaping plan. h. The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. i. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within affected portion of any phase at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is requested for any building. j. Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan. k. Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details. Applicant's Initials: Page 4 of 17 PA 2017-62/CUP 2020-10/CDR 2020-09 PC: March 1, 2022 Conditions of Approval CC: TBD I. Final landscape plans shall include drought tolerant planting consistent with Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District standards subject to plan check and approval by the City's landscape plan check consultant. m. No turf shall be permitted. 26. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Community Development Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 27. The proposed location of on-site construction trailers shall be approved by the Community Development Director or designee. A cash bond of $1,000 shall be required for any construction trailers placed on the site and used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to approval of the Community Development Director or designee. Such trailer(s)shall be fully on private property and outside the public right of way. BUILDING DIVISION General Conditions 28. Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety Conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 29. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2019 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes: 2019 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, 2019 California Energy Codes, 2019 California Green Building Standards, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 30. Green Measures. The application shall provide 10% voluntary green measures on the project, as stipulated by the 2019 California Green Building Standards. 31. Disabled Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. All ground floor units to be adaptable. b. Disabled access from the public way to the entrance of the building. c. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as club house, trach enclosure tot lots and picnic areas. 32. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi-family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. It takes 10 days to issue address and notify other agencies. Please contact Sonia Salazar at Applicant's Initials: Page 5 of 17 PA 2017-62/CUP 2020-10/CDR 2020-09 PC: March 1, 2022 Conditions of Approval CC: TBD ssalazar@lake-elsinore.org or 951-674-3124 X 277. 33. Clearance from LEUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Lake Elsinore School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 34. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 35. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. 36. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. Septic systems will need to be approved from Riverside County Environmental Health Department before permit issuance. 37. House Electrical Meter. Applicant shall provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. At Plan Review Submittal 38. Submitting Plans and Calculations. Applicant must submit to Building and Safety four (4) complete sets of plans and two (2) sets of supporting calculations for review and approval including: a. An electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic, and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work. b. A Sound Transmission Control Study in accordance with the provisions of the Section 5.507, of the 2019 edition of the California Building Code. c. A precise grading plan to verify accessibility for the persons with disabilities. d. Truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the building and the truss manufacturer engineer. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) 39. Onsite Water and Sewer Plans. Onsite water and sewer plans, submitted separately from the building plans, shall be submitted to Building and Safety for review and approval. 40. Demolition Permits. A demolition permit shall be obtained if there is an existing structure to be removed as part of the project. Asbestos report and lead base paint reports are required before demo permit will be issued. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 41. Plans Require Stamp of Registered Professional. Applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on the plans. Provide C.D. of approved plans to the Building Division. Applicant's Initials: Page 6 of 17 PA 2017-62/CUP 2020-10/CDR 2020-09 PC: March 1, 2022 Conditions of Approval CC: TBD Prior to Beginning of Construction 42. Pre-Construction Meeting. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. ENGINEERING DIVISION General 43. All new submittals for plan check or permit shall be made using the City's online Self-Service Portal (CSSP). 44. All plans (Street, Storm Drain, Improvement, Grading) shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer using the City's standard title block. 45. All required soils, geology, hydrology and hydraulic and seismic reports shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. 46. All slopes and landscaping within the public right-of-way shall be maintained by the property owner, owner's association,firms contracted by the property owner's association, or another maintenance entity approved by the City Council. 47. All open space and slopes except for public parks and schools and flood control district facilities, outside the public right-of-way shall be owned and maintained by the property owner or property owner's association. 48. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated both during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction and during occupancy. 49. Applicant shall submit a detailed hydrology and hydraulic study for review for the sufficient containment and conveyance of the storm water to a safe and adequate point as approved by the City Engineer. 50. The site will accommodate all construction activity, building activity, vehicles, etc. No staging on public streets or private property belonging to others shall be conducted without the written permission of the property owner. FEES 51. Applicant shall pay all applicable permit application and Engineering assessed fees, including without limitation plan check and construction inspection fees, at the prevalent rate at time of payment in full. 52. Applicant shall pay all applicable Mitigation and Development Impact Fees at the prevalent rate at time of payment in full. Mitigation and Development Impact Fees include without limitation: a. Master Plan of Drainage Fee — Due prior to Grading Permit issuance b. Traffic Infrastructure Fee (TIF) — Due prior to Building Permit issuance c. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) — Due prior to Occupancy Applicant's Initials: Page 7 of 17 PA 2017-62/CUP 2020-10/CDR 2020-09 PC: March 1, 2022 Conditions of Approval CC: TBD d. Stephens' Kangaroo Habitat Fee (K-Rat)— Due prior to Grading Permit issuance 53. Applicant shall pay fee in-lieu of construction of future City road cross-section median improvements on Mission Trail and Casino Drive. The fee shall be equal to current cost estimate for improvements (including contingency) plus an additional 15% of the total construction cost estimate to cover design and administrative costs. LAND DIVISION-DEDICATION 54. All required public right-of-way dedications and easements shall be prepared by the developer or his agent and shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval. 55. Applicant shall dedicate in fee title to the City right-of-way along Mission Trail adjacent to the property frontage for a total right-of-way of 60 feet from centerline to the project property line. 56. Applicant shall dedicate in fee title to the City right-of-way along Casino Drive adjacent to the property frontage for a total right-of-way of 50 feet from centerline to the project property line. 57. The project may vacate/abandon City approved excess right-of-way by separate instrument. All City costs for processing a vacation/abandonment (ex. Publication, noticing) shall be invoiced and paid by the developer. 58. Legal agreements and financial commitments (LLMD, CFD, etc.) for operation and maintenance be recorded prior to Certificate of Occupancy. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT/ POLLUTION PREVENTION / NPDES Design 59. The project is responsible for complying with the Santa Ana Region NPDES Permits as warranted based on the nature of development and/or activity. These Permits include: a. General Permit— Construction b. De Minimus Discharges c. MS4 60. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be prepared using the Santa Ana Region 8 approved template and guidance and submitted for review and approval to the City. a. The Final WQMP shall be approved by the City prior to rough or precise grading plan approval and issuance of any permit for construction. 61. The Final WQMP shall document the following: a. Detailed site and project description. b. Potential stormwater pollutants. c. Post-development drainage characteristics. d. Low Impact Development (LID) BMP selection and analysis. e. Structural and non-structural source control BMPs. f. Treatment Control BMPs. g. Site design and drainage plan (BMP Exhibit). Applicant's Initials: Page 8 of 17 PA 2017-62/CUP 2020-10/CDR 2020-09 PC: March 1, 2022 Conditions of Approval CC: TBD h. Documentation of how vector issues are addressed in the BMP design, operation and maintenance. i. GIS Decimal Minute Longitude and Latitude coordinates for all LID and Treatment Control BMP locations. j. HCOC—demonstrate that discharge flow rates, velocities, duration and volume for the post construction condition from a 2-year and 24-hour rainfall event will not cause adverse impacts on downstream erosion and receiving waters, or measures are implemented to mitigate significant adverse impacts downstream public facilities and water bodies. Evaluation documentation shall include pre- and post-development hydrograph volumes,time of concentration and peak discharge velocities, construction of sediment budgets, and a sediment transport analysis. (Note the facilities may need to be larger due to flood mitigation for the 10-year, 6- and 24-hour rain events). k. Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan and Agreement (using City approved form and/or CC&Rs) as well as documentation of formation of funding district for long term maintenance costs. 62. The 2010 SAR MS4 Permit requires evaluation of the site for implementation of LID Principles and LID Site Design, where feasible, to treat the pollutants of concern identified for the project, the following manner (from highest to lowest priority): a. Evaluate site for highest and best use applicability (Exemption for projects that discharge to Lake Elsinore). b. Preventative measures (these are mostly non-structural measures, e.g. minimizing impervious areas, conserving natural areas, minimizing directly connected impervious areas, etc.) c. The Project shall in the order presented: infiltrate, harvest and use, evaoptranspire and/or bio-treat the Design Capture Volume (DCV). d. The Project shall consider a properly engineered and maintained bio-treatment system only if infiltration, harvesting and use and evapotranspiration cannot be feasibly implemented at the project site. e. Any portion of the DCV that is not infiltrated, harvested and used, evapotranspired, and/or bio-treated shall be treated and discharged in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section XII.G. 63. Parking lot landscaping areas shall be designed to provide for treatment, retention or infiltration of runoff. 64. Project hardscape areas shall be designed and constructed to provide for drainage into adjacent landscape. 65. Project trash enclosure shall be covered, bermed, and designed to divert drainage from adjoining paved areas and regularly maintained. 66. Hydromodification / Hydraulic Conditions of Concern — The project shall identify potential Hydraulic Conditions of Concern (HCOC) and implement measures to limit disturbance of natural water bodies and drainage systems; conserve natural areas; protect slopes and channels; and minimize significant impacts from urban runoff. 67. If CEQA identifies resources requiring Clean Water Act Section 401 Permitting, the applicant shall obtain certification through the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and provide a copy to the Engineering Department. Applicant's Initials: Page 9 of 17 PA 2017-62/CUP 2020-10/CDR 2020-09 PC: March 1, 2022 Conditions of Approval CC: TBD 68. All storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately marked "Only Rain in the Storm Drain" using the City authorized marker. 69. The project shall use either volume-based and/or flow-based criteria for sizing BMPs in accordance with NPDES Permit Provision XII.D.4. 70. The project site shall implement full trash capture methods/devices approved by the Region Water Quality Control Board. 71. To meet NPDES requirements, all vehicle/equipment washing/steam cleaning areas must be self-contained and/or covered, equipped with a clarifier or other pretreatment facility, and properly connected to a sanitary sewer or other appropriately permitted disposal facility. PLAN REQUIREMENTS: The Owner/Applicant shall incorporate these vehicle/equipment wash requirements into project design and depict on plans, including detail plans as needed. Construction 72. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) (as required by the NPDES General Construction Permit) and compliance with the Green Building Code for sediment and erosion control are required for this project. 73. Prior to grading or building permit for construction or demolition and/or weed abatement activity, projects subject to coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit shall demonstrate that compliance with the permit has been obtained by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) Number or other proof of filing to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A copy of the SWPPP shall be kept at the project site, updated, and be available for review upon request. 74. Erosion & Sediment Control —All Projects— Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit for construction or demolition, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by the City Engineer, an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan as a separate sheet of the grading plan submittal to demonstrate compliance with the City's NPDES Program and state water quality regulations for grading and construction activities. A copy of the plan shall be incorporated into the SWPPP, kept updated as needed to address changing circumstances of the project site, be kept at the project site, and available for review upon request. 75. The project shall implement LID practices that treat the 85th percentile storm in the priority order as follows: a. Highest and best use — treat all pollutants of concern to a medium to high level and discharge (applicable to projects discharging to Lake Elsinore) b. Infiltrate c. Harvest and use d. Evapotranspire and/or bio-treat 76. Chemical Management — Prior to issuance of building permits for any tank or pipeline, the uses of said tank or pipeline shall be identified and the developer shall submit a Chemical Management Plan in addition to a WQMP with all appropriate measures for chemical management (including, but not limited to, storage, emergency response, employee training, spill contingencies and disposal) in a manner meeting the satisfaction of the Manager, Permit Intake, in consultation with the Riverside County Fire Department and wastewater agencies, as appropriate, to ensure implementation of each agency's respective Applicant's Initials: Page 10 of 17 PA 2017-62/CUP 2020-10/CDR 2020-09 PC: March 1, 2022 Conditions of Approval CC: TBD requirements. A copy of the approved "Chemical Management Plans" shall be furnished to the Fire Marshall, prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Use and Occupancy. Post-Construction 77. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of use and/or occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with applicable NPDES permits for construction, industrial/commercial, MS4, etc. to include: a. Demonstrate that the project has compiled with all non-structural BMPs described in the project's WQMP. b. Provide signed, notarized certification from the Engineer of Work that the structural BMPs identified in the project's WQMP are installed in conformance with approved plans and specifications and operational. c. Submit a copy of the fully executed, recorded City approved Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan and Agreement for all structural BMPs or a copy of the recorded City approved CC&R. d. The Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan and Agreement and/or CC&R's shall: (1) describe the long-term operation and maintenance requirements for BMPs identified in the BMP Exhibit; (2)identify the entity that will be responsible for long-term operation and maintenance of the referenced BMPs; (3) describe the mechanism for funding the long-term operation and maintenance of the referenced BMPs; and (4) provide for annual certification for water quality facilities by a Registered Civil Engineer. The City format shall be used. e. Provide documentation of annexation into a CFD for funding facilities to be maintained by the City. f. Demonstrate that copies of the project's approved WQMP (with recorded O&M Plan or CC&R's attached) are available for each of the initial occupants. g. Agree to pay for a Special Investigation from the City of Lake Elsinore for a date twelve (12) months after the issuance of a Certificate of Use and/or Occupancy for the project to verify compliance with the approved WQMP and O&M Plan. A signed/sealed certification from the Engineer of Work dated 12 months after the Certificate of Occupancy will be considered in lieu of a Special Investigation by the City. h. Provide the City with a digital .pdf copy of the Final WQMP. UTILITIES 78. All arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 79. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 80. Applicant shall apply for, obtain and submit to the City Engineering Department a letter from Southern California Edison (SCE) indicating that the construction activity will not interfere with existing SCE facilities. 81. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Department from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location, such as water pressure, volume, etc. Applicant's Initials: Page 11 of 17 PA 2017-62/CUP 2020-10/CDR 2020-09 PC: March 1, 2022 Conditions of Approval CC: TBD IMPROVEMENTS Design 82. Sight distance into and out and throughout the project location shall comply with City or Caltrans standards. 83. 10-year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100-year storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria are exceeded, drainage facilities shall be provided. 84. All drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 85. A drainage study shall be provided. The study shall identify the following: identify storm water runoff from and upstream of the site; show existing and proposed off-site and on-site drainage facilities; and include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of the facilities. The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that runoff from a 10-year storm of 6 hours and 24 hours duration under developed condition is equal or less than the runoff under existing conditions of the same storm frequency. Both 6-hour and 24-hour storm duration shall be analyzed to determine the detention 86. All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. All off-site drainage, if different from historic flow, shall be conveyed to a public facility. 87. Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs should drain to a landscaped area. 88. The site shall be planned and developed to keep surface water from entering buildings (California Green Building Standards Code 4.106.3). 89. All existing storm drain inlet facilities adjacent to the subject properties shall be retrofitted with a storm drain filter; all new storm drain inlet facilities constructed by this project shall include a storm drain filter. 90. A California Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare the improvement plans required for this project. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to City Standards and Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). 91. If existing improvements are to be modified, the existing improvement plans on file shall be revised accordingly and approved y the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. PERMITTING/CONSTRUCTION 92. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work on City right-of-way. The developer shall submit the permit application, required fees and executed agreements, security and other required documentation prior to issuance. 93. All compaction reports, grade certification, monument certification (with tie notes delineated Applicant's Initials: Page 12 of 17 PA 2017-62/CUP 2020-10/CDR 2020-09 PC: March 1, 2022 Conditions of Approval CC: TBD on 8'/2 X 11" Mylar)shall be submitted to the Engineering Department before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. PRIOR TO GRADING PERMIT Desiqn 94. A grading plan signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted for City review and approval for all addition and/or movement of soil (grading) on site. The plan shall include separate sheets for erosion control, haul route and traffic control. The grading submittal shall include all supporting documentation and be prepared using City standard title block, standard drawings and design manual. 95. All grading plan contours shall extend to minimum of 50 feet beyond property lines to indicate existing drainage pattern. 96. The grading plan shall show that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are located near the project entrances that could reduce sight distance. 97. If the grading plan identifies alterations in the existing drainage patterns as they exit the site, a Hydrology and Hydraulic Report for review and approval by City Engineer shall be required prior to issuance of grading permits. All grading that modifies the existing flow patterns and/or topography shall be in compliance with Federal, State and Local law and be approved by the City Engineer. 98. A seismic study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults, liquefaction and/or subsidence zones present on-site. A certified letter from a registered geologist or geotechnical engineer shall be submitted confirming the absence of this hazard prior to grading permit. The location of faults, active or inactive shall be shown on the plan sets. 99. The developer shall obtain all necessary off-site easements and/or permits for off-site grading and the applicant shall accept drainage from the adjacent property owners. 100. Developer shall mitigate to prevent any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or diversion of drainage. 101. All natural drainage traversing the site (historic flow) shall be conveyed through the site in a manner consistent with the historic flow or to one or a combination of the following: to a public facility; accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance; or conveyed to a drainage easement as approved by the City Engineer. Permit/Construction 102. Developer shall execute and submit grading and erosion control agreement, post grading security and pay permit fees as a condition of grading permit issuance. 103. A preconstruction meeting with the City Engineering Inspector (Engineering Department) is required prior to commencement of any grading activity. 104. Prior to commencement of grading operations, developer is to provide to the City a map of Applicant's Initials: Page 13 of 17 PA 2017-62/CUP 2020-10/CDR 2020-09 PC: March 1, 2022 Conditions of Approval CC: TBD all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. All such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Haul route shall be submitted prior to issuance of a grading permit. Hauling in excess of 5,000 cubic yards shall be approved by the City Council (LEMC 15.72.065). 105. Export sites located within the Lake Elsinore City limits must have an active grading permit. 106. Applicant to provide to the City a video record of the condition of all proposed public City haul roads. In the event of damage to such roads, the applicant shall pay full cost of restoring public roads to the baseline condition. A bond may be required to ensure payment of damages to the public right-of-way, subject to approval of the City Engineer. 107. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer. Slopes steeper than 2 to 1 shall be evaluated for stability and proper erosion control and approved by the City. 108. Review and approval of the project sediment and erosion control plan shall be completed. As warranted, a copy of the current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for review upon request. 109. Approval of the project Final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)for post construction shall be received prior to issuance of a grading or building permit. 110. Submit applicable environmental clearance document to the Engineering Department. This approval shall identify and clear all proposed grading activity anticipated for this project. PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT 111. Provide soils, geology and seismic report, including recommendations for parameters for seismic design of buildings, and walls prior to building permit. 112. Prior to issuance of certificates of use and occupancy or building permits for individual tenant improvements or construction permits for a tank or pipeline, facility uses shall be identified and, for specified uses (where the proposed improvements will store, generate or handle hazardous materials in quantities that will require permitting and inspection once operational), the applicant shall propose plans and measures for chemical management (including, but not limited to storage, emergency response, employee training, spill contingencies and disposal) to the satisfaction of the City Building Official(s). 113. All street improvement plans, traffic signal plans, signing and striping plans shall be completed an approved by the City Engineer per Traffic Impact Analysis dated June 4, 2021, as specified. 114. All required public right-of-way dedications and easements shall be prepared by the developer or his agent and shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY/ FINAL APPROVAL 115. All public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans or as condition of this development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Applicant's Initials: Page 14 of 17 PA 2017-62/CUP 2020-10/CDR 2020-09 PC: March 1, 2022 Conditions of Approval CC: TBD 116. Proof of acceptance of maintenance responsibility of slopes, open spaces, landscape areas, and drainage facilities shall be provided. 117. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be recorded prior to occupancy. A digital copy shall be provided to the Engineering Department. 118. As-built plans for all approved plan sets shall be submitted for review and approval by the City. The developer/owner is responsible for revising the original mylar plans. 119. In the event of the damage to City roads from hauling or other construction related activity, applicant shall pay full cost of restoring public roads to the baseline condition. 120. Final soil report showing compliance with recommendations, compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certification (with tie notes delineated on 8 '/2 X 11" Mylar) shall be submitted in .tif format on a USB flash drive or electronically to the Engineering Department before final inspection will be scheduled. 121. All required public right-of-way dedications, easements, vacations and easement agreement(s)shall be recorded with a recorded copy provided to the City prior to occupancy. 122. Applicant shall pay all outstanding applicable processing and development fees prior to occupancy and/or final approval. PROJECT CLOSEOUT/ SECURITY RELEASE 123. Applicant shall submit documentation pursuant to City's Security Release handout. 124. Applicant shall submit as-built all Engineering Department approved project plan sets. After City approval of paper copy, the developer/owner is responsible for revising the original mylar plans. Once the original mylars have been approved, the developer shall provide the City with a digital copy of the "as-built" plans in .tif format. 125. Applicant shall provide AutoCAD and GIS Shape files of all Street and Storm Drain plans. All data must be in projected coordinate system: NAD 83 State Plane California Zone VI U.S. Fleet. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE FIRE MARSHAL 126. The applicant/operator shall comply with all requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department Lake Elsinore Office of the Fire Marshal. Questions should be directed to the Riverside County Fire Department, Lake Elsinore Office of the Fire Marshal at 130 S. Main St., Lake Elsinore, CA 92530. Phone: (951) 671-3124 Ext. 225. DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Annex into the City of Lake Elsinore Community Facilities District No. 2015-2 (Maintenance Services 127. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall annex into the Community Facilities District No. 2015-2 (Maintenance Services) or current Community Facilities District in place Applicant's Initials: Page 15 of 17 PA 2017-62/CUP 2020-10/CDR 2020-09 PC: March 1, 2022 Conditions of Approval CC: TBD at the time of annexation to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of the public right- of-way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public right-of-way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison, including parkways, street maintenance, open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project. Alternatively, the applicant may propose alternative financing mechanisms to fund the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project with respect to Maintenance Services. Applicant shall make a non-refundable deposit of$15,000 or at the current rate in place at the time of annexation toward the cost of annexation, formation or other mitigation process, as applicable. Applicant's Initials: Page 16 of 17 PA 2017-62/CUP 2020-10/CDR 2020-09 PC: March 1, 2022 Conditions of Approval CC: TBD I hereby state that I acknowledge receipt of the approved Conditions of Approval for the above named project and do hereby agree to accept and abide by all Conditions of Approval as approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore on . I also acknowledge that all Conditions shall be met as indicated. Date: Applicant's Signature: Print Name: Address: Phone Number: Applicant's Initials: Page 17 of 17 CITY OF JAN�- LADE 0LSMORE DREAM EXTREME IMPERIAL STATIONS PLANNING APPLICATION No. 2017-62 Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-10 Commercial Design Review No. 2020-09 CLASS 32 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION CHECKLIST Prepared By: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Applicant: DAVID BERRI, IMPERIAL STATIONS, INC. 3199 Red Hill Avenue Ste. B Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Project Location: 31800 Mission Trail APN: 363-172-016 February 2022 SURROUNDING LAND USES AND SETTING: The project site is located at 31800 Mission Trail between Diamond Drive and Malaga Road. The project site is currently vacant and has street frontage along Mission Trail and Casino Drive. The project site has a General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designation of Commercial Mixed Use (CMU). Existing land uses surrounding the proposed project include commercial uses and a church to the north (Winston Plaza), commercial uses and a preschool to the south (Mission Trail Plaza), commercial uses to the west (La Laguna Mercado Shopping Center), and commercial development to the east across Casino Drive. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project proposes to establish a new 3,000 sq. ft. convenience store with the concurrent sale of beer and wine (Type 20 ABC), a 4,400 sq. ft. canopy with 18 fueling stations, and a 5,739 sq. ft. self-serve carwash on an approximately 1.8-acre site (`Project'). The Project will provide 49 parking spaces that include 22 standard spaces, two (2) accessible spaces, and 25 vacuum spaces. The proposed convenience store is a single-story building with a height of 28'-6" and the proposed carwash building is a two-story building with a height of 27'-6". The buildings would incorporate architectural elements (such as parapets) of different heights and staggered exterior wall planes. Exterior building finish materials of the convenience store would include smooth stucco, foam trim finished with stucco, aluminum doors with tempered glass, and a metal awning. Exterior building finish materials of the carwash building will include smooth stucco, foam trim finished with stucco, aluminum composite roof fascia, metal siding, metal awnings, metal accent roofing, tempered glass windows, and steel canopy columns. Exterior colors of the buildings will include various shades of gray and red accent. The Project would include approximately 11,944 sq. ft. of landscaped area, or 15.1 percent coverage of the lot area. New landscaping would be installed along the Project frontage on Mission Trail and Casino Drive to provide effective screening for the Project. Access to the site will be provided by two 30-foot driveways (with full ingress and/egress) at Mission Trail. The proposed site plan is shown in Figure 2. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) ZONING: Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) Imperial Stations Class 32 Categorical Exemption Checklist - Page 2 of 14 �a - � > � . � � ! \ ' ® . � • � ` r , e - Q , . wr / ' « � A Figure 2 — Site Plan III M Fq q T O N T F A [ L a D q. ° El - L 8---- a I I 9 I 1 3 l l e I, AA y g y Imperial Stations Class 32 Categorical Exemption Checklist - Page 4 of 14 INFORMATION DEMONSTRATING THAT THE PROJECT SATISFIES THE CONDITIONS DESCRIBED IN SECTIONS 15300.2 AND 15332 OF TITLE 14 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS: Criterion (a): Is the project consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations? The Project site has a General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designation of Commercial Mixed Use (CMU). The CMU Land Use Designation provides for a mix of residential and non- residential uses within a single proposed development area, with an emphasis on retail, service, civic and professional office uses. The proposed Project, a gasoline dispending establishment and carwash, is a permitted use subject to a Conditional Use Permit under the CMU zoning land use regulations. The Project complies with all applicable development standards of the CMU zone. Therefore, the Project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. Criterion (b): Is the proposed development located within the City limits on a Project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses? The approximately 1.8-acre Project site is entirely located within Lake Elsinore city limits, within a developed portion of the Lake Elsinore Hills District and is surrounded by various nonresidential urban uses, as shown in Figure 1. Criterion (c): Does the Project site have value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species? The Project site is entirely disturbed does not contain suitable habitat for any candidate, sensitive, or special status plant or wildlife species. The Project site has been disked for weed abatement purposes. Moreover, the Project site is surrounded by existing urban development. Furthermore, the Project site is not located within a Criteria Cell of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) and was not required to be processed through the Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process (LEAP) and Joint Project Review (JPR) processes. The Project complies with the MSHCP and is consistent with all applicable requirements of the MSHCP. Criterion (d): Would approval of the Project result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality? I. Traffic The following review of potential traffic impacts is based on the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by STE dated June 4, 2021 (included as Appendix A) for the proposed Project. The purpose of the Traffic Impact Analysis is to assess the potential effects of the Project on the transportation system by estimating changes to Level of Service (LOS) for nearby road intersections and changes to vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per capita. Imperial Stations Class 32 Categorical Exemption Checklist - Page 5 of 14 A summary of the Transportation Impact Analysis is provided below: • The Project does not change existing LOS at nearby intersections which will continue to operate at LOS C or better under Existing Plus Ambient Plus Project Conditions. This level of service does not fall below the City's minimum LOS of D or better. Therefore, the Project does not cause a significant impact to LOS. • The Project's incremental VMT per capita change is presumed to be less than significant because the Project meets the City's impact screening criteria. The City's Traffic Impact Analysis guidelines provide that local serving retail Projects less than 50,000 square feet may be presumed to result in less than significant VMT impacts. Therefore, the Project would not cause a significant impact to VMT per capita. Conclusion: The Project would not significantly impact the City transportation system because (1) affected intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels above the City minimum, and (2) the Project's changes to VMT per capita may be assumed to be less than significant under the City's adopted Traffic Impact Analysis guidelines. For additional information, refer to the Traffic Impact Analysis and VMT memorandum included as Appendix A to this report. II. Noise The following review of potential noise impacts is based on the Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis prepared by LSA dated November 2021 (included in Appendix B) for the Project. Under Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed Project would create significant impacts if the Project would result in: • Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the Project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies; • Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels; or • Expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels if the Projects is located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport The purpose of the Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis is to assess the potential noise and vibration impacts resulting from the Project construction and operation, in addition to evaluating whether the Project would expose people to excessive noise levels. A summary of the Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis is provided below: • Construction of the Project would not exceed the City's construction noise standards. Therefore, the Project would not result in significant noise impacts from construction activities. • Operation of the Project would not exceed the City's exterior noise standards. Therefore, the Project would not result in significant noise impacts from operational activities. Imperial Stations Class 32 Categorical Exemption Checklist - Page 6 of 14 • Construction and operation of the Project would not generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. Therefore, the Project would not result in significant vibration impacts. • The Project site is located outside the applicable noise contours of nearby airports. Therefore, the Project would not expose people working in the Project area to excessive noise levels and not create significant impacts. Conclusion: Construction of the Project would result in temporary noise impacts from transportation of construction crews and equipment to and from the Project site, and noise from construction activities including operation of mobile and stationary construction equipment. However, any temporary increases in ambient noise levels caused by construction would not exceed the City's mobile and stationary construction noise standards. Therefore, impacts from construction noise would be less than significant. Although not required to mitigate any significant impacts under CEQA, the City will require the Project to comply with the following Conditions of Approval to minimize noise from Project construction as recommended in the Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis: ➢ The construction contractor shall erect a minimum 14-foot high temporary construction barrier to shield the playground associated with the preschool from mobile construction equipment and a minimum 8 ft high portable temporary construction barrier immediately to the southeast for all onsite stationary construction equipment. The barrier shall be continuous with no gaps or holes and may be any material that has a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 28 ➢ The construction contractor shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards. ➢ The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the Project site whenever feasible ➢ The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and the noise-sensitive receptors nearest the Project site during all Project construction whenever feasible Operation of the Project would result in an increase in ambient noise levels from the car wash, fueling activities, parking activities, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) noise equipment, and truck deliveries and Project-related traffic. However, the increases in ambient noise levels caused by operation would not exceed the City's exterior noise standards. Therefore, impacts from operational noise would be less than significant. The nearest airport facility to the Project site is a private airstrip located 1.5 miles away to the south of the Project site. However, the airport conditions are not optimal to service frequent or significant levels of air traffic. Therefore, the Project would not result in significant impacts because the Project would not expose people working in the Project area to excessive noise levels. Imperial Stations Class 32 Categorical Exemption Checklist - Page 7 of 14 Lastly, the Project would not generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels during construction or operation of the Project because vibration and groundborne noise resulting from the Project would not exceed applicable Federal guidelines relating to vibration impacts on sensitive receptors. Therefore, no significant vibration impacts would occur. For additional information, refer to the Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis included as Appendix B to this report. III. Air Quality The following review of potential air quality impacts is based on the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by LSA dated November 2021 (included in Appendix C)for the Project. Under Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed Project would create significant impacts if the Project would: • Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan; • Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard; • Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; or • Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people The purpose of the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis is to assess the potential air quality impacts resulting from the Project construction and operation, in addition to evaluate the Project's compliance with applicable criteria pollutant thresholds established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). A summary of the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis is provided below: • Construction and operation of the Project would not emit criteria pollutants exceeding the daily emissions thresholds established by SCAQMD. Therefore, the Project would not result in any regionally significant air quality impacts from Project construction and operation. • Construction and operation of the Project would not emit pollutants in excess of localized significance thresholds established by SCAQMD. Therefore, Project would neither result in any localized significant air quality impacts from Project construction and operation nor expose nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. • The proposed Project would not result in substantial increases in CO concentrations at intersections in the Project vicinity that would result in the exceedance of federal or State CO concentration standards. • Construction and operation of the Project would not result in significant odor impacts. • The proposed Project would not conflict with any applicable air quality plans including Lake Elsinore Climate Action Plan, SCAQMD Air Quality Plan, and the Southern Imperial Stations Class 32 Categorical Exemption Checklist - Page 8 of 14 California Association of Governments Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. Given this consistency, it is concluded that the proposed Project's impact to the climate from GHG emissions would not be cumulatively considerable. Conclusion: Project construction would result in emissions from equipment exhaust, fugitive dust, and architectural coatings. Both regional and localized construction emissions from Project construction would fall below SCQAMD daily significance thresholds. Therefore, the Project would not result in significant regional or localized air quality impacts due to Project construction. Project operation would result in regional impacts from increase in Project trip generation, and localized impacts from natural gas use for heating and emissions from on-site movement of motor vehicles. Regional and localized emissions from Project operation would fall below SCQAMD daily significance thresholds. Therefore, the Project would not result in significant regional or localized air quality impacts due to Project operation. Moreover, the Project does not have the potential to expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people, or conflict with or obstruct implementation of any air quality plan. In conclusion, the Project would not result in any significant air quality impacts. For additional information, refer to the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis included as Appendix C to this report. IV. Water Quality The Project site is located within the San Jacinto River Sub-watershed of the Santa Ana Watershed region of Riverside County. The Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB) sets water quality standards for ground and surface waters within the region. Water quality standards are defined under the Clean Water Act to include both the beneficial uses of specific water bodies and the levels of water quality that must be met and maintained to protect those uses (water quality objectives). Construction of the proposed Project would include grading, excavation, installation of subsurface infrastructure, and other earthmoving activities that have the potential to cause erosion that could degrade surface or ground water quality and/or violate water quality standards. The use of heavy construction equipment could result in the accidental release of hazardous materials (e.g., oils, fuels, and other water quality pollutants) that also could potentially affect surface and/or ground water quality. As required by the Clean Water Act, the Project would comply with the Santa Ana Municipal Separate Storm Sewer (MS4) NPDES Permit. The NPDES MS4 Permit Program, which is administered in the Project area by Riverside County and is issued by the SARWQCB, regulates storm water and urban runoff discharges from developments to natural and constructed storm drain systems in the City. Since the proposed Project would disturb one or more acres of soil, construction activities would be subject to the Construction General Permit (NPDES General Permit No. CAS000002, Waste Discharge Requirements, Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ, adopted September 2, 2009 and Imperial Stations Class 32 Categorical Exemption Checklist - Page 9 of 14 effective as of July 2, 2010) issued by the SWRCB. The Construction General Permit requires implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for site clearing, grading, and disturbances such as stockpiling or excavation. The SWPPP would generally contain a site map showing the construction perimeter, proposed buildings, storm water collection and discharge points, general pre- and post-construction topography, drainage patterns across the site, and adjacent roadways. The Project site is currently vacant and consists of undeveloped, pervious surface. The existing drainage runoff are collected by concrete gutters and flow west to Casino Dr. by gravity. The proposed Project is a Carwash building with parking lots, driveway, and landscape areas. Conclusion: A Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan (FWQMP-2020-00007) dated April 2, 2020 (Revised October 13, 2020) has been prepared for the Project to address the increase in polluted runoff that would occur from the proposed Project by describing the site design, source control and treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be implemented and maintained throughout the life of the Project. The onsite stormwater runoff will be collected by an onsite biofiltration system where it would pass through a filter and then be temporarily retained in the soil media. The plants and biological activity in the root zone would then function to take up pollutants and runoff, thus filtering the water before it is released into the storm drain system that eventually leads to Lake Elsinore. The SWPPP must also include construction-phase BMPs to protect against stormwater runoff. Through implementation of both the WQMP and SWPPP BMPs, along with regulatory compliance, the Project would meet applicable standards and discharge regulations. Therefore, the Project would not otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality and any water quality impacts resulting from the proposed Project would be less than significant. For additional information, refer to the Water Quality Management Plan included as Appendix D to this report. Criterion (e): Can the Project site be adequately served by all required utilities and public services? Fire Protection: Development of the Project would be subject to City policies and ordinances relating to hazard mitigation and fire prevention. The Project would be required to comply with applicable fire code requirements for construction and access to the site and as such, will be reviewed by the City Fire Department to determine the specific fire requirements applicable to ensure compliance with these requirements. Chapter 16.74 of the LEMC establishes a program for the adoption and administration of development impact fees by the City for the benefit of the citizens whereby as a condition to the issuance of a building permit or certificate of occupancy by the City, the property owner or land developer is required to pay development impact fees or provide other consideration to the City for the purpose of defraying the costs of public expenditures for capital improvements (and operational services to the extent allowed by law) which will benefit such new development. Section 16.74.049 includes a "fire facilities fee" to mitigate the additional burdens created by new development for City fire facilities. Since the proposed Project includes new housing, impacts must be offset through the payment of the appropriate development impact fees. The Project would incrementally increase demands for Imperial Stations Class 32 Categorical Exemption Checklist - Page 10 of 14 fire protection services associated with service calls, inspections, etc. The increase in demand for fire protection services from this increase is not anticipated to require the construction of new facilities or infrastructure. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts related to fire protection, and impacts would be less than significant. Police Protection: Chapter 16.74 of the LEMC establishes a program for the adoption and administration of development impact fees by the City for the purpose of defraying the costs of public expenditures for capital improvements (and operational services to the extent allowed by law) which would benefit such new development. The proposed Project would participate in this development impact fee program to mitigate potential impacts to police protection resources. Additionally, the Project would be required to comply with applicable law enforcement requirements and standards to ensure adequate law enforcement protection is available to serve the Project site. Potential impacts would be considered incremental and can be offset through the payment of the development impact fee and compliance with regulatory requirements. The proposed Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts related to police protection. Therefore, potential impacts associated with police Projection would be less than significant. Schools: The proposed Project site is located within the Lake Elsinore Unified School District (LEUSD). The Project would be required to pay school impact fees as levied by the LEUSD, which would provide funding for school facilities. The proposed Project does not propose new housing which could generate new students who would require LEUSD facilities and services. Therefore, any potential impacts would be considered incremental and would be offset through the payment of the appropriate development impact fees for schools. Based on the above, the proposed Project will not result in substantial adverse physical impacts related to schools. Any impacts would be less than significant Parks: The proposed Project does not propose residential uses so it would not generate additional residents who would need park facilities or services. Therefore, a direct increase in park usage is not expected as a result of the Project. New commercial development may cause incremental indirect impacts to park facilities from the occasional use of a park by employees during a lunch or dinner break. Section 16.34.060 in Chapter 16.34 (Required Improvements) for the LEMC requires that prior to the issuance of a building permit, the property owner or developer must pay fees for the purposes set forth in that section. Paragraph D of Section 16.34.060 describes the City's Park Capital Improvement Fund and describes that the City Council has the option to request dedication for park purposes or in lieu thereof, request that the property owner or developer pay a fee for the purpose of purchasing the land and developing and maintaining the City park system. As a commercial Project, the proposed Project would be required to pay park fees to the City for the purpose of establishing, improving and maintaining park land within the City. Since the Project does not propose new housing so any potential impacts would be considered incremental and would be offset through the payment of the appropriate park fees. Based on the above, the proposed Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts related to parks. Any impacts would be less than significant. Other Public Facilities: The City is part of the Riverside County Library System. Section Imperial Stations Class 32 Categorical Exemption Checklist - Page 11 of 14 16.34.060 in Chapter 16.34 (Required Improvements) of the LEMC requires that prior to the issuance of a building permit, the property owner or developer must pay fees for the purposes set forth in that section. Paragraph B of Section 16.34.060 describes the City's Library Mitigation Fee and states that an in-lieu fee for future construction of library improvements shall be paid to the City to assure the necessary library facilities are provided to the community. Since the proposed Project would include new housing, potential impacts must be offset through the payment of the appropriate library mitigation fees. Therefore, potential impacts associated with libraries would be less than significant. Chapter 16.74 of the LEMC establishes a program for the adoption and administration of development impact fees by the City for the purpose of defraying the costs of public expenditures for capital improvements (and operational services to the extent allowed by law) which would benefit such new development. Section 16.74.048 includes an "Animal shelter facilities fee" to mitigate the additional burdens created by new development for animal facilities. In addition, the property owner would be required to pay City Hall & Public Works fees, Community Center Fees, and Marina Facilities Fees prior to the issuance of building permits. Therefore, potential impacts associated with other public services and facilities would be less than significant. Wastewater/Sewer: The Project site is located within the wastewater/sewer service boundary of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). The Project site's development plan proposes to connect to the EVMWD wastewater/sewer system. Connections to local sewer mains will involve temporary and less than significant construction impacts that will occur in conjunction with other on-site improvements. In addition, the Project will be required to pay sewer connection fees. Implementation of the proposed Project will not require, or result in, the construction of new wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. Any impacts will be less than significant. Storm Water Drainage: On-site grading and drainage improvements proposed in conjunction with the proposed site work would be required to comply with provisions of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program, including Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR), and the 2010 Santa Ana Municipal Separate Sewer Permit (MS4) Permit, as enforced by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQCB). Pursuant to the City's Municipal Code, all construction Projects shall apply Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be contained in the Project applicants submitted Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The proposed Project was required to submit a Project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) in identifying post-construction BMPs that include drainage controls such as infiltration pits, detention ponds, bioswales, berms, rain gardens, and pervious pavement. In addition, the proposed Project was required to submit a drainage study to ensure onsite and offsite drainage is accurately assessed and sufficient infrastructure is required for construction of the Project. During the grading and construction phase, the applicant will need to comply with the conditions of approval placed on the Project. With adherence to the Project- specific WQMP, the proposed Project will not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, nor will it require new or expanded off-site storm drain facilities the construction Imperial Stations Class 32 Categorical Exemption Checklist - Page 12 of 14 or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects. Any impacts would be less than significant. Water Supplies: The Project site is located within the water service boundary of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). The Project's development plan proposes to connect to the EVMWD water supply system. Connections to local water mains will involve temporary and less than significant construction impacts that will occur in conjunction with other on-site improvements. In addition, the Project will be required to pay water connection fees and comply with Water Efficient Guidelines. Implementation of the proposed Project will not require, or result in, the construction of new water treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects. Given the proposed Project's relatively small size, any potential impacts are considered nominally incremental and less than significant. Solid Waste Disposal: All development within the City of Lake Elsinore is required to comply with applicable elements of AB 1327, Chapter 18 (California Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Access Act of 1991), AB 939 (CalRecycle), and other local, state, and federal solid waste disposal standards. The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) requires every city and county in the state to prepare a Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) to its Solid Waste Management Plan, that identifies how each jurisdiction will meet the mandatory state diversion goal of 50% by and after the year 2000. The purpose of AB 939 is to "reduce, recycle, and re-use solid waste generated in the state to the maximum extent feasible." The Project site's development plan is required to comply with applicable elements of AB 1327, Chapter 18 (California Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Access Act of 1991), AB 939, and other applicable local, state, and federal solid waste disposal standards as a matter of regulatory policy as standard condition of approval, thereby ensuring that the solid waste stream to the waste disposal facilities is reduced in accordance with existing regulations. Any potential impacts will be less than significant. Electricity, Natural Gas, Telephone, Television: The Project site is located in a developed, urban setting. The site and the surrounding properties are fully served by various utility service providers. There are no anticipated significant service or system upgrades required to serve the Project. Any increase in the demand for public utilities by the Project would be less than significant. Imperial Stations Class 32 Categorical Exemption Checklist - Page 13 of 14 DETERMINATION: I find that the answers given above are adequately supported by the information sources cited following each question and that the effects of the proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of Projects (i.e., Class 32 — Infill Development Projects) characterized as in-fill development meeting the conditions of Section 15332 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. The proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents under the California Environmental Quality Act. ke vier reef y 2i�i2022 J Kevin Beery, Associate Planner Date Appendices: The following documents were used as information sources during preparation of this document. They are available for public review at the City of Lake Elsinore, Community Development Department, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530, ph. (951) 674- 3124. A) Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by STE dated June 4, 2021 B) Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis prepared by LSA dated November 2021 C) Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by LSA dated November 2021 D) Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Ronie Dema-ala dated April 2, 2020 (Revised October 13, 2020) Imperial Stations Class 32 Categorical Exemption Checklist - Page 14 of 14 Planning Application No. 2017-62 AP N: 363-172-016 VICINITY MAP , PROJECT SITE s 1'o s sti 0 o 0 z 0 Q 0 BARE-H=ST u� O CAMPBEL-L-ST ? N CITY OF LADE LSIROIJE DREAM EXTREME `TM 4 / w�� + +z. •r�. � �„ Jam' _� Kr 1 f i PROJECT SITE in 10 CAMPBELL ST +` 0 +• 1 - �ol - D o •�- -• -oo .o �o c, J ° i s • a SITE DATA INFORMATION DEVELOPERS INFORMATION: ACCESSOR'S BERRI BROTHERS PARCEL NUMBER 22 SHADY LANE 363-172-016 IRVINE, CA 92603 ZONING: PH# (714) 801-3918 CMU CONTACT: LEGAL DESCRIPTION DAVID BERRI PARCEL 3 OF MAP 19767 U) z z S 20 18 12 8 4 0 w W w O 0 I Fr. ACRE RATIO U) PHASE I LOT AREA 79,041.0 1.8 - GRAPHIC SCALE > W C-STORE BUILDING AREA W OCCUPANCY: M 3,000.0 - 3.7% VICINITY MAP CONSTRUCTION: V-B CANOPY AREA I -N-Cul Burger OCCUPANCY: M 5,739.0 - 7.3% Id rve-:`4 01 LLJ ECONSTRUCTION: V-B cl- CAR WASH �cv, to WaImart � cn s+y"n� o EOCCUPANCY: B 4,400.0 - 5.6% ��k�sFros� � �fLLJ CONSTRUCTION: V-B �r La.cc; h o Ld LANDSCAPING AREA 11,944.0 - 15.1% Rt f; REQUIREMENT TYPE SIZE REQUIRED PROVIDED . "` C-STORE: 1/250 HANDICAP 17`X18` 1 2 "r o CAR WASH: 2/BAY a :. REGULAR 9 X18 13 22 # s� r- �o E ere����b� � U �«� 00 (Do VACUUM 13 X18 0 25 'PARKING . Lake E18in©re s= I I AREA TOTAL: 14 49 Hnwl & Casing �' - Q N� inare Diamond�i �` � � o- �' °' ° .''�^^ •� N X ^VJ f-LL W D N / O N cn I U n Uo Lr7 A Q tar `0 E O �O y 00 N I COMMERCIAL N70 ' 130 o o o o o o Q F- � F- � 4 A - $ tso 1.Q0 ,90 2,0 5'-0• .o .a 230 . ■PAM%O ® , , ,.es ,.es ,.es ,.es ,.es ,.es ,.es ,.es ,.eo �) ti��04 >k6 w 1.50 ,so 1.50 IA IYP. z71 IYP. z so TV. 2z1 O 1A ,.,o ® t.� ,.e5 ,.e5 10'-0• I I , 2.80 O 1.75 1.80 .m 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 W 5� � � 4' 13010 13'-10' 11'-2• 11'-Y 13'-10• .0 A V O Q I O 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 30'-0' .. 195 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 01 �., 2� 8'-0• \O �� j T I V Q3 Nil\ 411\ I I-Alk x I A Ilk ),III\ I AIN I / Aii,, \-7 3o FUEL 14 O NOPY 5 1.� ;; t,' ,x -T. . a -- ° n 1.30 120 -- n , r1 1.30 I � e u F I 1� w I • l01 1.10 D _ ______________ II 91 * R 20K UNL 87 1.10 I C I '7 1.30 a II O LO I O I O I OI SELF SERVE T 20K UNL 87 2.30 ,,q�,ggHH o ,50 r 1� ,� - CAR W5,7ATUNNEL --------_ -- t�0 j Q =#= r' O ^ • t.eo t.eo t.eo t.eo t.eo t.eo t.eo 1az'-o• x'-0• 1w ` O Fma 1a10 7 3i 1.50 P� .50 n as O J 120 LZ0Uj ® 120 1.f0 r 120 1.10 1.20 1 20 120 120 U 1 1 1W Loo ■ 9 42 .90 2N'-0• w NW025VE O Q DATE ISSUED: 08/08/17 SCALE: COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL v DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: F. COHEN F. COHEN a� PROJECT NUMBER: PRESCHOOL YARD 17081 / ISI#9 SHEET: F=> L- C.1.0 SCALE:1'=29-0' mm J COMMERCIAL F N71'' bZ754 z 20 16 12 6 4 0 20' 40r w O o 1 1.20.30 0 0 0 0 0 o � � O o � c�a�iic sce►� wlo c w VICINITY MAP z 0 \CD 1.90 2.10 � ��s z � ® O �I�9ti! 8u1. 6urg�r -Did N�,�;52t' n 1.70 IF r� � � 'rya I mart Q v 2.20 kTyp.1.50 CD 4 0 O 14 CD /i Q o At _ v 7 1l Gi O 00 ,� O r 2 a b� o , �� O oz 18-0 VI 1.50e��.e�hr br "� 00 't LO F- " o �? fi (� co N O 0 o d ° oo Hmc-I & Cnsina� � Q C' `u�. L�4C�Elsi�ir�re� �.���a.'��, � E 6' Q 35 -O o �� � ° o � � 1.30 O CONSTRUCTION NOTES J 0 U) .. X ® O O O O O ^V 1J O � I TYP. 2.71 I <� 1.10 6" CONCRETE CURB 0 N I TYP• 2.50 TYP• 2.21 0 1.20 2 70 1.20 AREA LIGHT U 1 10 QC 1.30 LANDSCAPING WITH AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION cn I o 1.40 6" CONCRETE DRIVE SLAB WITH #3 BARS @ 18" O.C. OR AS U 10'-0" I I \ 1.10 SPECIFIED IN SOILS REPORT IF AVAILABLE. �� > CDN 0 1.40 0 1.50 6" OVER 4" A.B. ASPHALT PAVING OR AS SPECIFIED IN SOILS REPORT460 E 0 M I I IF AVAILABLE. C®ri� W 1.75 1.60 w 1.60 48" HANDICAP PATH OF TRAVEL (SLOPE NOT TO EXCEED 2% EACH v C_-, WAY) WITH DECORATIVE PAVERS f 1 91 o rLn I I 00 : o z 1.70 12'X18' HANDICAP PARKING SPACE WITH ALL RELATED SIGNAGE (SLOPE N T 13'-10" 11'-2" 11'-2" 13'-10" "' � NOT TO EXCEED 2% E.W.) O I I 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.8001 30'-0" z 1.75 BICYCLE PARKING (MIN. 3) PER CAL GREEN CODE O M ® O O O O O O O O O I oD 1.80 9'X18' STANDARD PARKING SPACES 2.41 2.90 1.85 13'X18' WIDE PARKING SPACES WITH VACUUM UNITS r I I 3'-0" o� 8 0 8'-0" 1.90 CONCRETE HANDICAP RAMP (SLOPE 8.33%) " I FUELING CANOPY I d O° 1.30 1.91 CONCRETE SIDEWALK (MIN. 48" WHERE HANDICAP PATH OF TRAVEL C7 4,400sf I I 1 1.30 �p 1.20Ll 2.10 TORASH SENCLOSURE WITH STEEL GATES i o I I / 0 1 2.40 0 2.20 6" CONCRETE FILLED STEEL GUARD POSTS T o 1.10 ° so T ,r, ® d 2.21 U-SHAPE STEEL GUARD POSTS d G O 2.30 AIR/WATER UNIT & VACUUMS 1.40 - � * • U I I CD r 20K UNL. 87 2.35 CAR WASH PAYPOINT AND AUTOMATIC GATE I I 2.40 UNDER GROUND STORAGE TANKS (2) 20,000 GALLON AND (1) 22,000 - T 130 N GALLON UNDER REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB z 2.41 TANK VENT RISERS CARBON CANISTER oIsj- * ' 0 2.50 CONCRETE ISLAND W 1 MULTI PRODUCT DISPENSER 6" MIN. & 8" Ll O O O O * • o / ( ) ® O O O O O O O O I �- ,� a s 5'-6" MAX. HEIGHT) 5 20K UNL. 87 2.30 1.50 I I c ° 2.70 FUELING CANOPY 0 2.20 2.71 FUELING CANOPY COLUMNS 2.80 ID L 7 ,.2 2.80 -J of o 2.855 SAND ANDOIL INTERCEPTOR o N 2.90 ELECTRICAL PANELS T 1.30 10.10 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PER AGENCY STANDARD N 10.20 CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER AGENCY STANDARD 0 a 1.20 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 pk v a 4 MO '`vD O 1 10 1.10 SITE DATA INFORMATION z 102 -0 35 -0 DEVELOPER'S INFORMATION: ACCESSOR'S 10 Q 10.10 BERRI BROTHERS PARCEL NUMBER 22 SHADY LANE 363-172-016 U IRVINE, CA 92603 _ PH# (714) 801-3918 ZONING: Uj - - CMU co Uj 1.50 CONTACT: LEGAL DESCRIPTION (n 1.50 DAVID BERRI PARCEL 3 OF MAP 19767 0^ O z SQ. FT. ACRE RATIO z 79,041.0 1.8 PHASE I LOT AREA ® ® o C-STORE BUILDING AREA Z 0 w 1.10 120 M 1.20 1.20 OCCUPANCY: M 3,000.0 - 3.7% 0 1.20 1.30 CONSTRUCTION: V-B U w CANOPY AREA m` 0 �z OCCUPANCY: M 5,739.0 - 7.3% T CONSTRUCTION: V-B ItJ 427.90 CAR WASH OL. < V j N7TO2'547'E OCCUPANCY: B 4,400.0 - 5.6% DATE ISSUED: CONSTRUCTION: V-B 08/08/1 7 SCALE: LANDSCAPING AREA 11,944.0 - 15.1% DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: REQUIREMENT TYPE SIZE REQUIRED PROVIDED F. COHEN F. COHEN C-STORE: 1/250 , HANDICAP 17 X18 1 2 PROJECT NUMBER: CAR WASH: 2/BAY REGULAR 9'X18' 13 22 17081 PARKING L VACUUM 13'X18' 0 25 IS1#9 AREA TOTAL: 14 49 SHEET: C.1.1 -F E-= F" L- At N SCAl F: A ti r m U� z z z z z z Z-Z-Z-Z-z 20 18 12 8 4 0 20' 40' w O o m U� � U 0 1.20 GRAPHIC 9CALE > w /-Z-Z W o rk-NO O O O O VICINITY MAP z 1.30 ` In-N-Ou1. Burger 10 �e�s � walmano CD V w LakeSl�Dre df �r 0 � �ake�h� CD /N�l FE L A FAI T N 4 ,.80 U , H.80 1.80 � � 0 CD � L CD 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 4 �' ®_ 13'-0" 9'-0" 1.10 ° der S�xV r- �C) E Dr �fi (� 00 co N o ru. 6>O U Lako,F�Sltl0FL- = N H�tl & Csia� � - Q N� 1 1.50 1.50 p heap Ala �'v O CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1.10 6" CONCRETE CURB 0 N 0 1.20 AREA LIGHT U N 12'-O" 13'-0" 13'-0" 1.30 LANDSCAPING WITH AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION cn �. 1.40 6" CONCRETE DRIVE SLAB WITH #3 BARS 0 18" O.C. OR AS U C� 1.85 1.85 1.85 n n n SPECIFIED IN SOILS REPORT IF AVAILABLE. a, � Q 1.50 6" OVER 4" A.B. ASPHALT PAVING OR AS SPECIFIED IN SOILS REPORT � c3 \ 1.70 1 ` IF AVAILABLE. co = O 1.60 48" HANDICAP PATH OF TRAVEL (SLOPE NOT TO EXCEED 2% EACH O v 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 U, WAY) WITH DECORATIVE PAVERS00 r z 13 G 1.70 12'X18' HANDICAP PARKING SPACE WITH ALL RELATED SIGNAGE (SLOPE N \/ NOT TO EXCEED 2% E.W.) R N /A 1 z 00 O 1.85 0 O O O0 1.75 BICYCLE PARKING (MIN. 3) PER CAL GREEN CODE • 1.80 9'X,8' STANDARD PARKING SPACES c� `1 ` 1.85 13'X18' WIDE PARKING SPACES WITH VACUUM UNITS U-) I\\ /A . //Il IN •O 1.90 CONCRETE HANDICAP RAMP (SLOPE 8.33%) OO O O O O O O `• ` 1.91 CONCRETE SIDEWALK (MIN. 48" WHERE HANDICAP PATH OF TRAVEL OCCURS 00 «� 2.10 TRASH ENCLOSURE WITH STEEL GATES ------ ____ VV 2.20 6" CONCRETE FILLED STEEL GUARD POSTS 1.30 O ■ i I o 0 2.21 U-SHAPE STEEL GUARD POSTS �---------- - ------------------- ----------------------- , ==-�-,r--------------------��---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x -------------------------------------------------�-----------------------------------------------------------� O � 2.30 AIR/WATER UNIT & VACUUMS O' 2.35 CAR WASH PAYPOINT AND AUTOMATIC GATE 1.40 SLOPE3% , , ° 2.40 UNDER GROUND STORAGE TANKS (2) 20,000 GALLON AND (1) 22,000 GALLON UNDER REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB ' ' 1 2.41 TANK VENT RISERS CARBON CANISTER 2.50 CONCRETE ISLAND W/ (1) MULTI PRODUCT DISPENSER (6" MIN. & 8" 1.40 1��0" MAX. HEIGHT) T SELF SERVE 2.70 FUELING CANOPY -- -- CAR WASH TUNNEL ;- ---- -- ----- 2.71 FUELING CANOPY COLUMNS 1.30 � , , NAGE 1.20 �;;---- 51739,9f - 2.85 S S AND (0 1.30 j 2.85 SAND AND OIL INTERCEPTOR 89' ` 2.90 ELECTRICAL PANELS 1.10 10.10 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PER AGENCY STANDARD 10.20 CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER AGENCY STANDARD 0 Cal i� r 0 CY3 1.10 to I LO -1 T .-?nl -� �i� SITE DATA INFORMATION N CV O ` 1.30 DEVELOPERS INFORMATION: ACCESSOR S O EF �� BERRI BROTHERS PARCEL NUMBER I Q 22 SHADY LANE 363-172-016 U IRVINE, CA 92603 � w 1.40 PH# (714) 801-3918 CMUING: U 0 0 rn a, T -201 ( A CONTACT: LEGAL DESCRIPTION DAVID BERRI PARCEL 3 OF MAP 19767 O M ° Llrj� z FT. ACRE RATIO PHASE I LOT AREA 79,041.0 1.8 O J 1.20 w C-STORE BUILDING AREA O pop- o 0 T -201 ( A 1.20 1.10 OCCUPANCY: M 3,000.0 - 3.7% H 1.20 1.20 CONSTRUCTION: V-B W M Uj CANOPY AREA OCCUPANCY: M 5,739.0 - 7.3% CONSTRUCTION: V-B C") J 269'-0" CAR WASH • OCCUPANCY: B 4,400.0 - 5.6% DATE ISSUED: 5 ECONSTRUCTION: V-B 08/08/1 7 SCALE: LANDSCAPING AREA 11,944.0 - 15.1% DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: REQUIREMENT TYPE SIZE REQUIRED PROVIDED F. COHEN F. COHEN C-STORE: 1/250 HANDICAP 17'X18' 1 2 PROJECT NUMBER: CAR WASH: 2/13AY REGULAR 9'X18' 13 22 17081 PARKING L VACUUM 13'X18' 1 0 1 25 ISI#9 AREA TOTAL: 1 14 49 SHEET: C.1.2 -F E-= F" L- A%, N A CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE VICINITY MAP Tire Sit ., Mountain View Church 6 ulcwrr�i, AIHIiM1I'.II Southern Csliform i U Hau EMS Training Inst€ uti Nkghorfood Dea�e Skylark Grassroots Lemon St S E D C O HILLS Field Airport HydreponiCS Inc I µ n1R1a1I'rli�fldS ( a 1 f the valley-, NOT TO�S/CAL &dive EIs'riore 9 e I PROJECT SITE LUaiga$t Ili a=lr Si Map data @2019 SHEET INDEX Tm GP-01 COVER SHEET GP-02 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN GP-03 GRADING SECTIONS GP-04 GRADING DETAILS GRADING NOTES owNER 6P-05 EROSION CONTROL PLAN I, ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 11. GRADING CERTIFICATION BY THE DEVELOPER'S CIVIL ENGINEER AND A FINAL 30. AN APPROVED SET OF GRADING PLANS SHALL BE ON THE JOB 51TE AT ALL TIME. BERRI BROTHERS GP-Ob CONSTRUCTION BMPS MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 15.12 AND APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND COMPACTION REPORT BY A SOILS ENGINEER SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE 31. SANITARY FACILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON THE SITE FROM BEGINNING TO 31gq REDHILL AVE SPECIFICATIONS AND THE LATEST EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE (U.B.C), BUILDING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING COMPLETION OF GRADING OPERATION. C05TA MESA, GA g2626 CHAPTER 33. PERMITS. 32. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE PLANTED AND IRRIGATION FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED P: 114-801-NI8 18. THE SOILS ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION DATED PREPARED BY (ENGINEER FOR ALL SLOPES IN EXCESS OF THREE (3) FEET VERTICAL HEIGHT WITHIN NINETY 2. A PERMIT SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, CITY OF CONSULTANT) DATED AND THE ENGINEERING GEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION DATED (410) DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING AND SHALL BE IN PROJECT ADDRES: PROJECT TEAM LAKE ELSINORE, PRIOR TO ANY OPERATIONS, PREPARED BY (GEOLOGIC CONSULTANT), SHALL BE CONSIDERED A PART OF THIS ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GRADING ORDINANCE NO. 882 PRIOR 31600 MISSION TRAIL GRADING PLAN AND SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE, TO THE APPROVAL OF FINAL INSPECTION, LAKE ELSINORE, GA g2530 ARCHITECT: GJG DESIGN, INC. 3. THE DEVELOPER AND/OR THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL UTILITY Iq. A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER OR LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR SHALL SUBMIT 33, ANY CONTRACTOR PERFORMING WORK ON THIS PROJECT SHALL FAMILIARIZE 11801 PIERCE STREET, SUITE 246 COMPANIES AND U.S.A. ALERT (1- 600-422-4133) FORTY-EIGHT (46) HOURS PRIOR CERTIFICATION OF BUILDING PAD ELEVATION, WHERE SPECIFIC ELEVATIONS ARE HIMSELF WITH THE SITE AND BE 50LELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO LEGAL DESCRIPTION RIVERSIDE, GA g2505 TO GRADING, REQUIRED, THE ELEVATION (WITH RESPECT TO MEAN SEA LEVEL) SHALL BE GIVEN, EXISTING FACILITIES RESULTING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM HIS OPERATIONS, (114) 4120-41643 IF AN ELEVATION WITH RESPECT TO ADJACENT GROUND SURFACE 15 REQUIRED, WHETHER OR NOT SUCH FACILITIES ARE SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. PARCEL 3 OF MAP 141161 CONTACT: FRED COHEN 4, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST THE ACTUAL DISTANCE ABOVE THE ADJACENT GROUND SHALL BE GIVEN. 34. THE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) BLUE TOP PER APN: 363-112-016 CIVIL ENGINEER: DZNE, INC. TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS IN ADVANCE OF BEGINNING GRADING OPERATIONS. 20. ALL PROPERTY CORNERS SHALL BE CLEARLY DELINEATED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO FIN15HED PAD, PRIOR TO ROUGH GRADE APPROVAL. 166 MATISSE CIRCLE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION/GRADING, 35, APPROXIMATE DATE OF: AL150 VIEJO, GA g2656 5, DUST SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY WATERING OR OTHER METHODS APPROVED BY 21, STABILITY CALCULATIONS WITH A SAFETY FACTOR OF AT LEAST 1.5 SHALL BE BEGINNING OPERATION: DRAINAGE METHODOLOGY TEL: (q4q) 305-Sg20 THE CITY ENGINEER, SUBMITTED BY A SOILS ENGINEER TO THE BUILDING AND ENGINEERING COMPLETION: DEPARTMENTS FOR GUT AND FILL SLOPES OVER THIRTY FEET (30') IN VERTICAL 36. NO ROCK OR OTHER IRREDUCIBLE MATERIAL WITH A MAXIMUM DIMEN51ON THE PROPOSED METHOD OF DRAINAGE FOR THIS CONTACT: RONIE DEMA-ALA 6. CUT SLOPES SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN 2 HORIZONTAL TO I VERTICAL, UNLESS HEIGHT, GREATER THAN THREE INCHES (3A) WILL BE PLACED IN FILLS WITHIN ROADBED PROJECT INVOLVES THE COLLECTION OF SURFACE SOILS ENGINEER. SOIL EXPLORATION COMPANY, INC. OTHERWISE APPROVED, AND SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN, 22. A FINAL COMPACTION REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL FILLS GREATER THAN AREAS OR THREE FEET (3') OF FINISH GRADES, UNLESS THE LOCATION, MATERIALS, DRAINAGE FOR ENTIRE SITE VIA CONCRETE DRAINAGE 1535 JURUPA AVE,, UNIT C ONE (1) FOOT, AND DISPOSAL METHODS ARE SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER, 5104ALE AND CURB AND GUTTER5 INTO CATCH BA51N5 RIVERSIDE, GA 412504 1. FILL SLOPES SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN 2 HORIZONTAL TO I VERTICAL, UNLE55 23. IF STEEP 5LOPING TERRAIN OCCURS UPON WHICH FILL 15 TO BE PLACED, IT MUST 31. THE ENGINEER MUST SET GRADE STAKES FOR ALL DRAINAGE DEVICES AND AND DIRECTED TO SUBTERRANEAN WATER QUALITY OTHERWISE APPROVED, SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN, AND SHALL NOT HAVE LESS BE CLEARED, KEYED AND BENCHED INTO FIRM NATURAL 501L FOR FULL SUPPORT, OBTAIN INSPECTION BEFORE APPROVAL, INLET AND PIPE NETWORK TO SAFELY D15GHARGE P: (g51) n 00 THAN 410% RELATIVE COMPACTION OUT TO THE FIN15HED SURFACE, PREPARATION SHALL BE APPROVED BY A REC715TERED 501L5 ENGINEER PRIOR TO 38. GRADING PLANS WILL NOT BE APPROVED UNTIL ALL RETAINING WALLS ARE STORM RUNOFF TO THE EXISTING MAINLINE STORM DRAIN soilexplorotionationeyQhoo.com PLACEMENT OF FILL MATERIAL, SLOPES GREATER THAN 5:1 ARE REQUIRED TO BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, SYSTEM. ROOF DOWN5POUT5 AND DECK DRAINS WILL 8, FILLS SHALL BE COMPACTED THROUGHOUT TO 410% DEN5ITY AS DETERMINED BY KEYED AND BENCHED, 3q. THIS SITE HAS OBTAINED A NATIONAL POLLUTION PREVENTION ELIMINATION CONNECT DIRECTLY TO NEAREST AREA DRAINS, LAND SURVEYOR: GRF ENGINEERING THE MODIFIED THREE (3) LAYER A,S.T,M, 0-1551-10 TEST METHOD, 24. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHOULD INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION IN THE FOLLOWING SYSTEM (NPDE5) PERMIT TO REGULATE MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL STORM WATER 6162 STANTON AVE, SUITE A STAGES: DISCHARGES, BUENA PARK, GA g0621 q, FILL AREAS SHALL BE GLEANED OF ALL VEGETATION AND DEBRIS, 5GARIFIED, a UPON COMPLETION OF CLEARING AND DURING EXCAVATION AND BEFORE NPDE5 WDID : __________ DATE PERMIT GRADING LEGEND (114) 348-5M2 AND INSPECTED BY THE GRADING INSPECTOR AND APPROVED 501LS TESTING BACKFILL OF ALLUVIAL, COLLUVIAL AND TERRACED AREAS AND ANY 15SUED:_________ SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS CONTACT : CESAR RAMIREZ AGENCY PRIOR TO THE PLACING OF FILL, SUBSTRUCTURES, 40. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS WILL BE KEPT CLEAR OF ALL OBSTRUCTIONS, NO IO.ALL FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE GLEAN EARTH, NO FILL SHALL BE PLACED UNTIL b. DURING ALL ROUGH GRADING AND OPERATIONS INCLUDING PRE-COMPACTION, BUILDINGS OR WALLS SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN EASEMENT LIMITS. TEMPORARY PREPARATION OF GROUND 15 APPROVED BY THE 501LS ENGINEER, BENCHING AND FILLING OPERATIONS, IMPROVEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO REMOVAL AT OWNER'S EXPENSE, •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROPOSED&'STORM DRAIN LINE c. DURING INSTALLATION OF BUTTRESS AND CANYON 5UB-DRAIN5 AND FILTER •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROPOSED 4'STORM DRAIN LINE SITE DATA 11, FINISH GRADE SHALL BE SLOPED AWAY FROM ALL EXTERIOR WALL5 AT NOT LESS MATERIAL, FERFSUBDRAIN _ _ _ PROPOSED PERFORATED 51113DRAIN THAN 1/2A PER FOOT FOR A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) FEET, THEN 1% (MINIMUM) TO d, WHEN ANY UNUSUAL GRADING CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING SOILS AND GEOLOGIST CERTIFICATION _ o _ PROPOSED MAIN INLET ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY ® (1(I FLOW LINE OF EARTH SW THIS GRADING PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AND FOUND TO BE ALE. CONSTRUCTION, o PROPOSED PLANTER DRAIN INLET 1 51TE ACREAGE .'18 AC) 25, EROSION CONTROL; ALL GRADED SLOPES SHALL BE PLANTED WITH R05EA ICE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS AS OUTLINED IN THE FOLLOWING PROPOSED ROOF DOM SMT 12.MINIMUM BUILDING PAD AND DRAINAGE SWALE SLOPE SHALL BE 1% IF CUT OR FILL PLANT OR ANOTHER APPROVED GROUND COVER, AT TWELVE INCHES (12A) ON GONG/ASPHALT AREAS 66,234 SF SLOPE 15 LESS THAN TEN FEET (10'), AND 2% IF GUT OR FILL 15 GREATER THAN TEN CENTER, SLOPES OVER FIFTEEN FEET (15') IN VERTICAL HEIGHT, IN ADDITION TO SOILS AND GEOLOGIST REPORT FOR THIS PROJECT, PROPOSED MAIN CATCH BASIN ROOF AREAS 2,g15 5F FEET (109. DRAINAGE 5WALE5 SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 05 DEEP AND GROUND COVER, SHALL BE PLANTED WITH APPROVED TREES, 5HRUB5 OR ENTITLED: SOIL ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING IMPERVIOUS AREAS 64120q SF CONSTRUCTED A MINIMUM OF TWO FEET (2) FROM THE TOP OF GUT OR FILL COMBINATION THEREOF, SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED AT TEN FEET (10) ON CENTER; PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 2 SLOPES, TREES AT TWENTY FEET (20') ON CENTER; COMBINATIONS FIFTEEN FEET (15') ON MATERIAL TESTING, GEOLOGY � �� � PROPOSED SITE SCREEN WALL (1.5g ASF C)CENTER. 5LOPE5 OVER THREE FEET (3') IN VERTICAL HEIGHT SHALL HAVE DATED; OGTO$ER q. 201 q �B WMBER; 1 q1 q'1-01 PROPOSED SIDE PROPERTY WALL 3 PERVIOUS (LANDSCAPE) S, 1q C (O.Ig AG) 13. PROVIDE 5' WIDE BY I' HIGH BERM OR EQUIVALENT ALONG THE TOP OF ALL FILL PERMANENT IRRIGATION SYSTEMS WITH BAGKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES PER FIRM NAME; 501E EXPLORATION COMPANY, ING. SLOPES OVER V HIGH, U.B.C. PROPOSED TREE BOX LOCATION 26. APPROVED PROTECTIVE MEASURES AND TEMPORARY DRAINAGE PROVISIONS BY; GENE K. LUU, PE 5541'I L---J EARTHWORK QUANTITIES 14. PROVIDE A BROW DITCH, DESIGNED TO HANDLE ONE HUNDRED (100) YEAR STORM MUST BE USED TO PROTECT ADJOINING PROPERTIES DURING THE GRADING PROJECT ENGINEER DATE �' PROPERTY LINE FLOWS ALONG THE TOP OF GUT SLOPES, PROJECT, BY; F,6, FINISHED 6RADE ITEM DE5CRIPTION QTY 21. APPROVED ER05ION PREVENTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED DATE F.S. FINISHED SURFACE 15. NO OBSTRUCTION OF FLOOD PLAINS OR NATURAL WATER COURSES SHALL BE DURING THE RAINY SEASON AND SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH DAYS T•WF•= TOP OF WOOD FENCE I RAW GUT Iq.110 GY D.F. 00"45POUT PERMITTED, WORK, INV. INVERT ELEVATION 2 RAW FILL 8q5 GY 25. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY AND STATE CONSTRUCTION SAFETY TAS. ; TOP OF SLAB 16.A SOILS ENGINEER SHALL BE RETAINED BY THE DEVELOPER, TO SUPERVISE ORDERS, Tom• TOP OF GRATE (DRAIN INLET) 3 NET EXPORT 18075 GY pl,GRADING AND PROVIDE A FINAL 501L5 REPORT WHICH INCLUDES FOUNDATION ' FLOW LINE 2q, THE LOCATION AND PROTECTION OF ALL UTILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE (EL(ELE1 ; EXISTING OR NATIJRAI. GRADE ELEV 4 OVER EXCAVATION(3 FT) REQUIREMENTS (SUBDIVISIONS) AND EXPANSIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SOIL, PERMITTEE. TC, - TOP OF COPING - POOL/SPA ((BUILDING i GARWASW 863 GY TW TOP OF WALL TF TOP OF FOOTING TP TOP OF PILASTER F,F, FINISHED FLOOR 6FF. ; 6ARA6E FINISHED FLOOR 6'GRAVITY FLOW TO LOWER LEVEL SUMP Z' FORGE MAIN DISCHARGE TO DRY STREAM BED AND LEAVE SITE o STREET LEVEL PRELIMINARY - PLANNING SUBMITTAL MARK REVISIONS P P R I D T E THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR C❑MPLIANCE WITH THE PREPARED BY: 66 MATISSE CIRCLE SEAL CITY [IF LAKE ELSIN❑RE SHEET 1 APPR❑PRIATE C❑NDITI❑NS OF DEVELOPMENT AND/OR CITY AND ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 P OFESS/O PRECISE GRADING PLANS N STATE LAWS AND HAVE BEEN FOUND ACCEPTABLE TEL: (949) 305-8920 ��`� °FM F2 GP-01 31800 MISSION TRAIL, LAKE ELSIN❑RE, CA 92530 � I d'zn engineering 0 9< 067 A SCALE : f� /� L E ; BENCH MARK: ❑F EX /31/21 l- f� DESIGNATIONI1.8MI : E-24 COVER BHFFT FSHEETS AS SH❑WN DISK 1.8 MILES SE ALONG BUSINESS REM❑N HABIB, RCE No. 83156 DATE R❑NIE L DEMA ALA DATE n ROUE STATE HWY 71 FROM ATSF FILE NO CITY ENGINEER sTq CiV IL �`P v, DATUM AD STATION NA D88 CITY OF LAKE ELSIN❑RE �FOF CA1 �F� DATE: 22 NOV 2019 YEAR LEVELED: 1970 ELEVATION : (1275.973 FT) C SING DRIVE - 34 L LTIM T 340 - ON - 330 330 � CGS ' ��� - --- I 320 320 - 310 T�9 E 15TING,GRAPE s �a S� j ___ �C' 310 T 89 S O ---- - I.. S •s ----- -- -- 9� O I C, � S�S S�6' S - ------ 'S � 1 ----- 300 �9 ry� <C� --- -- ---- ----- 1 ------ - --- ------ -- 1' TF nn - ----- ------ --�------ 2� L JV - -- -- ----- --- ----- --) non < - - __ --- v . el1,'`e1r<.wv 3fai?' y 280 tiG 280 TS G L INE T CONSTRUCTION NOTES: SGALE: I"=20'-O" ON-SITE: 10 INSTALL 12"X12" LOW PROFILE ADAPTER WITH GRATE, N05 1250 4 1245 OR EQUAL. O2 GONSTRUGT 24" WIDE GONGRETE DRAINAGE 5WALE (0.5% MIN SLOPE). - 340 340 SEE DETAIL I ON SHEET 4, GRADING DETAILS. - - " - - " R/W E 30 GON5TRUGT 6" CURB 4 GUTTER, TYPE A 330 IR'W 330 501 '0' 40 GON5TRUGT 5" GONG. FLATWORK ON GRADE PER SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. - 320 ��' 32 5 GONSTRU(T GONTAINMMENT BERM PER DETAIL ON SHEET 4. o t+(3/ 310 � � --- 310 CO O 9EXISTI S,GRADE - ------ - - - --- 30 28 .77 FF -- ---- - - ---- ---------- - 290 --------- - 29 --------------- ---- ---- R 80 --- l C C G PR APE 2 8 TS yC C C 0 05ED G 10 0 11 0 12 0 13 0 14 0 15 0 2a3 a )A (253.2g)FL _ LINE A 131a.6o)TG ,� z Il. ) o la.Io)FL Lu w l2go.2JF� z_ 0 SGALE: Lu J n - (3 .gl)6T I z m0(55L02 (2a5.20)INV (2154.21)AM � J A Q� ,`(� W O �(2a3.1q)INV Oj Q c�• of 1 ( 3. O) G83.24)INV 'b0 fib• FF 2901 ^� �� COMM -IAMERGIAL ADJACENT BUILDING PROP RTY FF 293.1 1 .52)F H G 0 31)TG (520.401 3\2'��u Awl / FE� T TP � l g2)FL (2a3. )AG 1° 4'E 430' LI 0.5 0.5 X - C. o 0 0 0 0 (2a3.a1)RIM (283.15)FL 3� 1283.1IJLIP „v ° RAS�II �� O \� �� E 0`�� �,�. ... . q 31 (2a3.04)FL DW � (2a FS fib' l2aa.61 b� ��� x( 6 F Q • is q.33; 2a5.46)A 285.81 X(2a6.10)AC ��� (2 F 'CO LIMITS OF OFF-SITE 2a3.51 Tx 285.58 FL \. Q ( ) 286.5 •I, o.• �,a N �,y d \ (32I.5a)AG GRADING (2a2.g2)FL of FL - �' Q. 14 �\ A\' t , F� - - - l2 fi6tJA�1.03 iT-o-rTl �\ '� 'L '�' �\ m ASPHALT GONGRETE b I O LINE A o F 0' o (2a2.gI)FL b� Na.� Q 2� RA 28q.S0 �� 2g0.26 2g0. tiA 2g0.'I (2gO.a6) 5 F� F� F 2g0.82 F �.1 ,xv I D�• �0 I FL FL 1.5JFG x (2 q.6)F6 L FL CA0N 4j• (2a3.a"JF - ( �.55)F5 - - - - - - - - - - - - \ ��.I)F6 1285.2)FZ i (2aa.a2)F5 � - : - - �F� - - - -_ � .55� 6 c�EG X l2aq.2- X( q l.l) 3.5)FC�; 2g4.5)F X( g5.a)FG - �\ X 4 F (2a3.1a)cv ® I I 253.46 �L��� 6" I 2 � A �Q �� a0'�� �G J I FL l2go.6q)F NO321.11)AG �cP qA � (2a3.44)TG I � I 0.58SG cA� Q. � -0` `r X(50 .5)F6 O l\A Q (2a2.a0)FL I 24" PLM b� `� I �. : \ 1255.2 I I 28q.32 rJ ® `� l2 a. 5)FO 0 �� ry o \ 1. X n/ #P-LP (2a3.63)F I �' g o'� 266. l I FL \, x l2 0� 2q 1.3q TG \\ >\ FHA= (2a3. )AG L•L 2210485E �y4�b'F� FL/ I I (Ig 6)F6 $ 2g 6 2 O.Sg F5 r \ �,�y� 7, ` \ \ (32212 �G 3\� �b (283.42)67E 2 X(2 ' fJ. '`Q 6 ^ }� ` 2q3 ��j .Z0�3 Y�) ti z I I �� �aF \ \ 32 q3�3 l2p 24" FL XO\O 2.0O (2a4.q)F �8 2a3.36 TC PA I (2a3. 0)AG ( ) I �\�b '�� ,I_ (� b 1� '�0 CO (282.11)FL (255 44)F �. - X I (INLET #1) 0 S ,yq� � 0°` A o.\�\aF�a\`? i \• a\• _._.A_._. :. \ \ l \ - , 2 .gq)Ac F � (� 283.2 1 w I� C� _ PA • 0 I , a0 �o. 'L m ;s, FL/L 24 PLM w o L C , � O \• 5 d - �. 5 (2a4.6)F �� 5.a)F p' Gj0 cs 2A FS Oj\'Z F� 80.E _ - a5.3)F6 (� � � 1 � � � 2 I. ZM � � 0o IN 5A 4.3390 X(2a .7) K uN� s7 ( )FG� b�� g3.6�Fj�� �0,�`�2g4.2) 6 3 D� ;$ � - •�' 3% : :=2a3 1JA� (2a2.bo)FL FL 285.5 0 - - - w . e� - - - - 0 ` ;:>;:' 2 \ - - - 7. "O':- <. �• --.-- -'�:.:. `j (324.53)TB l\Dc 1 84. G FL (324.21)AG RIGHT OF ��, \, 'S ::::: ::::::... 5 q3 G b. F 0 ::: �1.57...:q�` :::: -..--..-- ��• 0 \4 C� WAYLINE b �� ?�`O Q\, :•:•>;:<:•: •:•>;' .•- `Z.:>:•>;,�A•.:.:.:.:._.: -...-.• -.•.: • --'.•.•-•-•.•-•-•.•-••.--.-,.•-•-•.•-•-•-•-•-•-•.•-•-•.••-•-•-•-•-•-•--.•.--.•. "...� ------ a ! X(2a1.2)F2�b.43 F F5/F -' 2q1. OHO (2g4. ) ... ..2g5. F6..........:.. .....:::: ..... ..... . .......... ...... ...... .. PA. A �1 � 2 q F 3)F � 281 I 5 g3.�FG 'L o,� � •• -- .• " -•-•-•-•-.•-•-•.•-•-•-•-•-•-•.•-•-•.•--•-•-•-•-•-•.-.•.- .•.•-•-•-•-•-•-•.-•-•.•-•-•-•-•-•-••-'-'-'-'-'-'-'--'--'-'.•-•-•.•-•�- •.........................................................: \, '� - - - - - 0��4 (� .� cV q� ' �` \ /Y�. 26.31)AG �3 24° PLar _ 28b.b1 PA • - - - - - - - � + 6 T 'L (2a4.1)Fc2'86 61?G - 'CQ - + - - - - - - - - - -G - - -Q b 2 a O Li !yQ A\� 3 �,�'���\. a .y��\ \' 0 OTE- a II F � I 'L � (2a3.13)TG LM 286. 5 bQ ,\!(� b �Q \ 0. 0 0. Q '), 0��• i �\ N (326. (2a2.4q)FL �� (2a4.3)FG� 4.94go �,� t7� ��' 3 2 'L� �b•!<� N 7, !1� 3 N Tb 21i �o �1.38i �� 283.31 T - - LINE 282.31 INV 1 1.35� 2� 2� �'1 2 j 7. X(2 4. )fiG 2g5.3)F X(502.4)F , X(304.2)F a2)F6 (256.0)F6 (� X(2a7 2)FC� �� X(2a .I)F 1� X(2 La) G �V �V 00.4)F6 V 3.14 � F X(2 .5)FC� x(2gO. i cQ X(��3.5)FG I 3 2gq.16 W 2q4. ) 6 )F6 2g7.7) G ry� 0� l3 0)F 7' Q. \ Q. �' / \' \p ® ::'' :.:.::::::.::.:::::::::::::•.•.•... - ( q3. (2g4.54)TW .g4) W � Gj \. 7, ryQ.• ry� � a � X (282.g6)TX GA-TV ::: ::: :�?A ::;(2 ,.a5)T 1 91.g (2g2.2)Fr ( ) - ---- - - - - - - ------ -- (2�a_2-4) - - �2aq b Cz (2aq 5)F &1 - - - - - -- - --- - ---- (301. ( 2 . ;.;. OL.LV (253 2)AG OF CHAIN LI PROPERTY (� 2 " P M (326.63)A DWY 5.5' HE16HT UJ Q vt, z Q� !�C'1 t�C'1 BLOCK WAL F� z 1a02 5 C� w • Q F E/BEGINNI z F� ►� F� �� F� F� FQ) Lu ��V� a Q 0 (2a3.36)F Lu 1 LINE _ OO O ►\`l. O 40 60 PLAN J �� . C� Z WOOD FEND (2a3.00)Tx (� l2gq.2)FG GHAIN LINK �� (2a2.5g)FL Ia TR 287 2 3.5 TN 301 TW �\5 30q TW SGALE: -20 b4.q)F6 T �� H = 5.5' '2gX5)F6 2q TWFENCE - H/T11. ' PHIC S CAL E:32��20 '-0 " M A R K R E V I S I ❑ N S A P P R , DATE THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR C❑MPLIANCE WITH THE PREPARED BY. SEAL CITY ❑F LAKE E L S I N E R E SHEET 1 S VIEJO, E CIRCLE PRECISE GRADING PLANS APPR❑PRIATE C❑NDITI❑NS OF DEVELOPMENT AND/OR CITY AND Z)10 (A ISO VIEJO, CA 92656 QROFESS ON STATE LAWS AND HAVE BEEN FOUND ACCEPTABLE TEL: (949) 305-8920 � FMgq�� GP- 02d'zn engineering � 31800 MISSI❑N TRAIL, LAKE EOSIN❑RE, CA 92530 rn PRELIMINARY 6 c� -7 m W No. S C A E E I BENCH MARK 2 ❑F SHEETS DESIGNATION E-24 # EXP. 1121 AS SHOWN DISK 1.8 MILES SE ALONG BUSINESS GRADING PLAN REM❑N HABIB, RICE No. 83156 DATE R❑NIE L DEMA-ALA DATE ROUTE STATE HWY 71 FROM ATSF FILE No, CITY ENGINEER s7 C N L �P \ RAILROAD STATION CITY ❑F LAKE ELSIN❑RE �TFOF CAI- ��� "� 22 NOV2019 DATUM LEVNAVE88 LED: �F DATE:T E� YEAR LEVELED: 1970 ELEVATION : (1275.973 FT) I I II I II I II T. R/ a 9 G 32' 0 a i 3 2 -- 320 EXISTI G GRAD --- -- 3 2 o S � _ --- o �' -A, 3oa r � -- ---- -- - S cl14, 9 T 9 9 F -- ---- - ---- 9 "G 01.5 T a �9 /moo iS EX15T1 GRADE 9 6 6 ---�U ��,--- --�pt T�9 �o "G 30 0 s �02 rw 30 30 0 � '� ----- -- - ------ - - - - ------ -- �- -- --- - -- --- ------ --- ------ - ---- - - 292. 4 TOS I - - A CAR WAS TUNNEL] 1 2� 2 3_1 FF ,- m7 PROP05ED GRA E 2 8 0 - PROP05ED GRADE G ADJACENT BUILDI G S G 281) 280 A55UMED TO RETA GN EX. ADE LINE " F " LINE "G " SCALE: I"-20'-O" SCALE: "=20'-O" 1'-10" 11- 50'-0" LLTIMATE LLTIMAT 22 R/W EXISTING GRADE F ,RI W I ' R 3 0 - 320 G I GA51 NO z' ;. FG I II 313.5 I I- I I I II I II I II 311.5 �, GA51 N0 - - �,G G TN 320 32 Tw � •� -5 - 310 310 - � ., , r '� 12" WIDE CONC. �' � �' T 9 T 9 9 •s o s T ' � "x;' Y-DITCH 12" WIDE ON(. � s �� � �s�� s s s �6 6 s 02 rw 30 30 0 _ �� G '"G �' '�� � V-DITCH � "G (2%) F ----- - - -- - ------ ----- - 2 3.1 FF 3 � 2 `�2 2 - -- --- -- - 31 OII 4'-10" -10 2a4.31 pROP05 D GRADE 2a4.31 � TG PROP05ED GRADE ,�. TG 280 EXI5TIN6 GRA E ADJACENT ILDING I 281D 2a1.0 PROP05ED G DE A5 UMED TO ETAIN E fi GRAD I TF E LINE " Ell SECTION A SECTION A - 1 SCALE: 1"=20'-O" SCALE: "=10'-O" SCALE: ULTIMATE O,_0„ XI5TING GRADE G FE 320 3 � , � 2 � I INC 1 313.5 G 320 1_ II I_ II I_ II 3 2 I'/ Y TN f/VV G G S " " 30 0 s s s 310 s 30 y G 5 -T (212.5) F 28 .77 FF �' 12" IDE GONG. - --- -__ Y-DI GH - ---- --- -- -- ---- ------- cr --- 1% 300 =2a3.80 y , 280 PR P05E06 RAD G TG G G EX15TING GRADE G G G PROP05ED GRAD AD AGENT ILDING 15 2a1.0 GRADE LINE D " " SECTION B SCALE: SCALE: I"=20'-O" ULTIMATE R/W (Ex)R/w I I �I_OII I_ II I_ II I_ II - 320 - 320 -- 3 021D " ' T�c� 8y 8s o so r'e6. � o �; gal _____ � 30 s , --- 30 - 310 - ,c. o TW � ' �G 1, 81.5 T r S } EXISTING GRADE EXISTING GRA E _ 1 290 . FF " 1, _ I2" GONG, V-DITCH ---- ------ -- - --- - --- -------- ---- ------ ------ ---- 1'yy 300 98 ' 30 0 98 280 ' ,�. ,o G ,� � 2 3.51 FS �' � 2a3.5 X15TING 5RADE 2a5 ROP05E GRADE A55UM D TO RE AIN EX. TF TF 10 0 11 0 GRADE 12 0 290 - 290 LINE "C " 1 0 20 40 60 SCALE: I„ „ SECTION C SECTION D r//////////A _20 -O- SCALE: "=10'-011 SCALE: r=10'-011 GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"= 2 0 '-0 " PRELIMINARY - PLANNING SUBMITTAL M R K R E V I S I ❑ N S P P R D T E THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR C❑MPLIANCE WITH THE PREPARED BY 66 MATISSE CIRCLE SEAL CITY OF LAKE E L-S I N EI R E SHEET APPR❑PRIATE C❑NDITI❑NS [IF DEVELOPMENT AND/❑R CITY AND 4 Al 1 SO VIEJO, CA 92656 P FESS/0 PRECISE GRADING PLANS STATE LAWS AND HAVE BEEN FOUND ACCEPTABLE TEL: (949) 305-8920 °EMS F GP- 0 3 d'zn engineering 9� m31800 MISSI❑N TRAIL, LAKE ELSIN❑RE, CA 92530 5 67 A SCALE : K BENCH MAR OPTION 1 6 E 1/21 A S SHOWN DESIGNATION : E-24 ❑F SHEET S 14 DISK 1.8S MILES SE ALONG BUSINESS GRADING SECTIONS REM❑N HABIB, RCE No. 83156 DATE R❑NIE L DEMA-ALA DATE ROUTE STATE HWY 71 FROM ATSF FILE NO, CITY ENGINEER %9 �P ti\ RAILROAD STATION 9 V DATUM : NAVD88 CITY [IF LAKE ELSIN❑RE TFOF AUK (�,V DATE: 22 NOV 2019 YEAR LEVELED: 1970 - ` ELEVATION : (1275.973 FT) 24" IMDE WID7H=24'MIN., 40'MAX. FINISHED SURFACE SLOPED TO 3' 7RANSITTON TO 0" C.F. SWALE FLOW LINE (UNLESS JOINING ONSITE CURB) A o o _ FINISF SLRFACE SLOPE TO FLOMINE SLOPE TO FLOWLINE FINISH SURFACE �r VERTICAL FACE PCC CURB (HGT VARIES 0" - 6 c v d ° dSEE v a a ° f4 R=6, 0 41 , ad ° a NOTE d ' I • °6' SIDEWALK O a a ° ° WIDTH E v v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SEE S£E NOTE 7 NOTE/2 1 ••- e O�O�O�O�O�O�O�O�O�O�O�O�O�O�O�O 4 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CURB FACE* BEVELi— \/ x//AS SPEC/FIFO CURB TRANS ON PUNS FULL HEIGHT "SE£ NOTE#5 \ \ \ \ \ \\ SECTION "A-A" \ \ \ \ \ a. SECTION "C-C" ■ GU77ER B' VAR/E3 �' VARIES 7 . 8•P.aa 8'P.QC AC7i NOTES. /J TYPICAL CONCRETE SWALE SECTION 1. TYPE APPROACH SHALL BE USED WHEN SIDEWALK IS ADJACENT TO CURB. I 2. WEAKENED PLANE JOINT REOU/RED AT CENTERUNE OF APPROACH, AND AT 1/2 A SCALE: NT5 ICONCRETE SHALL Be-.PLASS 560-C-3250, CURED WIH WHITE PIGMENTED CURING COMPOUND. 4. '9 §F .'L /&P rSHALL HAVE 12" WIDE BORDER WITH GROOVES 1/4-DEEP, WMH 1/8-RADIUS, 5. X SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 1.12 (8.33X), AND A MINIMUM SLOPE' OF 1:15 (6.67X). 6. AMAZMUM GRADE BREAK SHALL BE 3X. 7. RAMP SURFACE SHALL BE SUP-RES/57ANT AND SHALL BE OF CONTRAS>rNG F/N/SH FROM ADJACENT SIDEWALK (MEDIUM BROOM FINISH OR EQUIVALENT). S. WTSD/BIURES ESS ACT SHALL STANDAR S/CAL/FOCONSIRUCAIM ToRN/A COD£OF RE ULAT/ONRREmr S TM/TELNE 2OF ACCESSIBILITY NS REGULA77ONS ADJUSTMEN7S SHALL BE MADE'/N THE FIELD 70 ACHIEVE RAMP CONDITIONS A STRUCTURAL SECTION COMPACT/ON PER APPROVED PUNS OR MINN, CALTRANS STANDARDS �� ENGINEER/NG �„�G7/D9 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE �Y P!/�'WlWPAS COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APPROACH: TYPE 11 �18B PROPOSED DECORATIVE PAVERS AND/OR VENEER TREATMENT PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. ------------------- ------ -------, NO. REBARS @24" O.C. PER 4 a d a a PORT a a a °4 a a a M*IMLM RECOMMENDED REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB THICKNESS AND 8' CONSTRUCTION/EXPANSION JOINTS FOR EXTERIOR CONCRETE FLATWORK PER SOLS REPORT. (COVER \/\ / WITH SLIP SHEET PRIOR TO TILE PLACEMENT) SCARIFY (12" MINIMLM DEEP) EXPOSED SURFACE FILL SOILS AND COMPACT TO OPTIMLM MOISTLRE CONTENT AND 90% RELATIVE COMPACTION BASED ON SOILS REPORT GRADING RECOMMENDATIONS CURB FACE 6" TYPICAL CONCRETE HARDSCAPE SECTION CURB FACE BATTER = 3.12 n `O r L SCALE: NT5 d VAR_ /i w ' A G d PROPOSED DRIVEWAY PAVERS PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. v-------------------------ffi /- 11-------------------------------------------- ------ , COMPACTED SUBGRADE a ° d a 3/4" CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE, co a da d a a ° ° ° d (CLASS 2) AS PER SOILS REPORT a G RECOMMENDATIONS -40 d ° ° a NOTES,• C.0 1.) CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 560-C-,325o P.C.C., CURED WITH WHITE PIGMENTED CURING COMPOUND. 2.)ALL EXPOSED CORNERS SHALL BE F!N/SHED W/T1! 1/2"RADIUS X// SUB BASECRUSHED STONE OR \ \.'L) F/N/SH SHALL BE FINE BROOM. \\ CONCRETE) PER SOILS REPORT 4) EXISTING P.C.C. SHALL B£SAWCUT AT JOINT PRIOR TO REMOVAL. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ RECOMMENDATIONS 5.) CURBS SHALL qAV£ EXPANS/ON JOINTS AT B.C.R. AMP E.C.R. AND WE PLANE \ JOINTS AT 10 INTERVALS ONLY. 6.)WHEN CURB AND GUTTER IS PLACED BY AN EXTRUSION MACHINE, F/N/SH/NG WORK SHALL PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE FINISH AND WEAKENED PLANE JOINTS \ \\\ ��\ �■ SCARIFY (12" MINIMUM DEEP) EXPOSED MAY BE SAWCUT. SURFACE FILL SOILS AND COMPACT TO 7.) SLOPE TOP OF CURB 1/4" PER FOOT 70WARD STREET OPTIMLM MOISTLRE CONTENT AND 90% RELATIVE COMPACTION BASED ON SOILS REPORT GRADING RECOMMENDATIONS 44 'P _ ENGINEERING 07/0s CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE �MW PRfPAM 6Y PUBLIC W IM TYPE 6A CURB ma a,,• v �>� 202 5 3 TYPICAL DRIVEWAY PAVER SECTION SCALE. NT5 PRELIMINARY - PLANNING SUBMITTAL MARK REVISIONS P P R , D T E THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR C❑MPLIANCE WITH THE PREPARED BY: SEAL CITY ❑E LAKE ELSIN❑RE SHEET 166 MATISSE CIRCLE PRECISE GRADING PLANS APPR❑PRIATE C❑NDITI❑NS OF DEVELOPMENT AND/OR CITY AND ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 OFESS/ONy GP- 04 STATE LAWS AND HAVE BEEN F❑UND ACCEPTABLE TEL: (949) 305-8920 Q- �-� EM � d'zn engineering 31800 MISSION TRAIL, LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 -7m _ G RAD ING 6 067 A SCALE : /� L E , BENCH MARK: 4 ❑F * E 1 31119 14 J l- f� A S SHOWN DISK DESIGNATION ILESESE 4ALONG BUSINESS SHEETS REM❑N HABIB, RCE No. 83156 DATE R❑NIE L DEMA-ALA DATE ROUTE STATE HWY 71 FROM ATSF FILE No. CITY ENGINEER s� IV IL �P �f 1 RAILROAD STATION '9pF �� , DATUM NAVD88 D ETAILS CITY OF LAKE ELSIN❑RE of CA1-�F l0� DATE: 22 N❑V 2019 YEAR LEVELED: 1970 ELEVATION : (1275.973 FT) DRY SEASON REQUREMENTS WET SEASON REQUIREMENTS EROSION CONTROL NOTES: N.P.D.E.S. NOTES: (MAY-SEPTEMBER) (OCTOBER-APRIL) I. IN GASE OF EMERGENGY, GALL BERRI BROTHERS AT OFF IGE PHONE # (714) 801-3918 12. THE PERMITEE AND GONTRAGTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND TAKE NEGESSARY PREGAUTIONS TO PREVENT PUBLIG I. WIND EROSION 5MF5 (DUST GONTROL) 5HAL BE IMPLEMENTED. I. WHERE APPROPRIATE SEDIMENT GONTROL BMPS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE PERIMETER, F 1-1 INSTALL TEMPORARY ER05ION GONTROL TREPASS ONTO AREAS WHERE IMPOUNDED WATER CREATES A HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS. 2. SEDIMENT GONTROL BMPS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED AT ALL OPERATIONAL STORM AT ALL OPERATIONAL STORM DRAIN INLETS, AND AT ALL NON-ACTIVE SLOPES, TO PROVIDE GRAVEL BA65 - 2 H16H 5E-6 BMP 2. 5EDIMEN7 FROM AREAS DISTURBED BY GON5TRUGTION SHALL BE RETAINED ON SITE U51NG 5TRUG7URAL CONTROLS DRAIN INLETS. SUFFIGIENT PROTEGTION FOR STORMS LIKELY TO OGGUR DURING THE RAINY SEASON. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRAGTIGABLE. 15. THE FERMITEE AND GONTRAGTOR SHALL INSPEGT THE EROSION CONTROL WORK AND INSURE THAT THE WORK 15 IN 5. BMPS TO CONTROL OFF-SITE SEDIMENT TRAGKIN6 SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AND MAINTAINED. 2. ADEQUATE PHY5IGAL OR VEGETATION EROSION GONTROL BMP5 (TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT) INSTALL TEMPORARY GONCRETE WA5H AGGORDANGE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS. 4. APPROPRIATE WA57E MANAGEMENT AND MATERIALS POLLUTION CONTROL BMP5 SHALL BE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND ESTABLISHED FOR ALL GOMPLEAED SLOPES PRIOR 70 THE START OF r2] OUT BA51N WITH PLA5TIG LINER - NM-b 5. STOGKPILES OF SOIL SHALL BE PROPERLY CONTAINED TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT TRANSPORT FROM THE SITE TO IMPLEMENTED TO PREVENT THE GONTAMINATION OF STORM WATER BY WASTES AND GONSTRUGTION THE RAINY SEASON. THESE BMP5 YU57 BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE RAINY SEASON. IF A BMP STREETS. DRAINAGE FAGILITIES OR ADJAGENT PROPERTIES VIA RUNOFF, VEHIGLE TAGKIN6, OR WIND. 14. THE FERM17EE AND GONTRAGTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL GENERAL GONTRAGAORS, 5UBGONTRAGTORS, MATERIAL MATERIALS. SLEGTED BMP5 FAILS, IT MUST BE REPAIRED AND IMPROVED, OR REPLACED WITH AN AGGEFAABLE SUPPLIERS, LESSEES, AND PROPERTY OWNERS: THAT DUMPING OF GHEMIGALS INTO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM OR THE 5. APPROPRIATE NON-STORM WATER BMPS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED TO PREVENT THE CONTAMINATION ALTERNATE AT SOON AT IT 15 SAFE TO DO 50. THE FAILURE OF A BMP MAY INDICATE THAT THE STREET SWEEPING AND VACUUMING AS 4. APPROPRIATE BMF'S FOR GONSTRUGTION-RELATED WATERSHED IT PROHIBITED. OF STORM WAfiTR FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. MATERIALS, WASTES, AND SPILLS, SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED TO BMP, AS INSTALLED, WAS NOT ADEQUATE FOR THE GIRGUMSTANGES IN WHIGH IT WAS USED. El REQUIRED - 5E-7 BMP MINIMIZE TRANSPORT FROM THE SITE TO STREETS, DRAINAGE FAGILITIES, OR ADJOINING PROPERTIES BY WIND OR 6. THERE SHALL BE A "WEATHER TRIGGERED" AGTION PLAN AND THE ABILITY TO DEPLOY STANDBY REPAIRS OR REPLAGEMENTS MUST RESULT IN A MORE ROBUST BMP, OR ADDITIONAL BMPS SHOULD RUNOFF. 15. EQUIPMENT AND WORKERS FOR EMERGENGY WORK SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES DURING THE RAINY SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP5 AS NEEDED TO COMPLETELY FROTEGT THE EXPOSED PORTIONS OF THE BE INSTALLED TO FROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION. SEASON. NEGESSARY MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE AND STOGKFILED AT GONVENIENT LAGATIONS TO SITE WITHIN 45 HOURS OF A FREDIGTED STORM EVENT (A FREDIGTED STORM IS DEFINED AS A 5. THE AMOUNT OF EXPOSED SOIL ALLOWED AT ONE TIME SHAL NOT EXGEED THAT WHIGH GAN BE F] INSTALL 5TOGKPILE MANAGEMENT - 5. RUNOFF FROM EQUIPMENT AND VEHIGLE WASHING SHALL BE GONTAINED AT GONSTRUGTION SITES UNLESS TREATED FAGILITATE RAPID GONSTRUGTION OF TEMPORARY DEVICES WHEN RAIN 15 IMMINENT. FOREGASTED, 50% GHANGE OF RAIN). ADEQUATELY PROTECTED BY DEFLOI'IN6 STANDBY EROSION CONTROL AND SEDIMENT GONTROL WM-3 BMP 70 REDUGE OR REMOVE 5EDIMENT AND OTHER POLLUTANTS. 7. SUFFIGIENT MATERIALS NEEDED TO INSTALL STANDBY 5EDIMENT CONTROL BMP5 (AT THE SITE BMFS FRIORT TO A FREDIGTED RAINSTORM. 6. ALL REMOVABLE EROSION FROTEGTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE IN FLAGE AT THE END OF EAGH WORKING DAY WHEN PERIMETER, SITE SLOPES AND OPERATIONAL INLETS WITHIN THE SITE) NEGESSARY fiO PREVENT 4. A DISTURBED AREA THAT IS NOT GOMFLETED BY THAT 15 NOT BEING AGTIVELY GRADED INSTALL 5ANITARY/5EPTIG WATTE 6. ALL GON5TRUGTION GONTRAGTOR AND SUBGONTRAGTOR PERSONNEL ARE TO BE MADE AWARE OF THE REQUIRED 5-DAY RAIN FROBABILIfiI' FOREGAST EXGEEDS 40%. SEDIMENT DISCHARGES FROM EXPOSED PORTIONS OF THE SITE SHALL BE STORED ON SITE. AREAS (NON-ACTIVE AREA) SHALL BE FULLY PROTECTED FROM EROSION WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT F-51 MANAGEMENT - WM-q BMP BEST MANAGEMENT PRAGTIGES AND GOOD HOUSEKEEPING MEASURES FOR THE FROJEGT 517E5 AND ANY BMP5 (EROSION AND SEDIMENT GONAROL). THE ABILITY TO DEPLOY STANDBY BMP MATERIALS 15 fiHAfi HAVE ALREADY BEEN FROfiECfiED FROM EROSION USING PHYSICAL STABILIZATION OR ATTOGIATED GON57RUGTION 57A61N6 AREAS. 17. SEDIMENTS FROM AREAS 0157URBED BY GONSARUGTION SHALL BE RETAINED ON SITE USING AN EFFEGTIVE NOT SUFFICIENT FOR THESE AREAS. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMFS MUST AGTUALLY BE ESTABLISHED VEGETATION STABILIZATION BMFS AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM H ARE NOT CONSIDERED TO COMBINATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRAGTIGABLE, AND 570GKFILES OF BE EXPOSED FOR PURPOSES OF THIS REQUIREMENT. DEPLOYED. THIS INCLUDES ALL BUILDING FADS, UNFINISHED ROADS, AND SLOPES. INSTALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION 7. AT THE END OF EAGH DAY OF GONSTRUGTION ACTIVITY ALL GONSTRUGTION DEBRIS AND WASTE MATERIALS SHALL SOILS SHALL BE PROPERLY CONTAINED TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT TRANSPORT FROM THE SITE STREETS, DRAINAGE 5. SUFFIGIENT MATERIALS NEEDED TO INSTALL STANDBY EROSION AND SEDIMENTS BMP5 NEGESSARY 61 ENTRANCE/EXIT - TG-I BE COLLEGTED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED IN TRASH OR REGYGLE BINS. FACILITIES OF ADJAGENT PROPERTIES VIA RUNOFF, VEHIGLE TRAGKIN6, OR WIND. 8. DEPLOYMENT OF PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL BMFS (PHYSICAL OR VEGETATION) SHOULD TO GOMFLETELY FROTEGT THE EXPOSED PORTIONS OF THE SITE FROM EROSION AND TO PREVENT COMMENCE AT SOON AS FRAGTIGAL ON SLOPES THAT ARE GOMFLTTTD FOR ANY PORTION OF THE SDEIMENfi DISCHARGES SHALL BE STORED ON-SITE. AREAS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN 8. GONSTRUGTION SITES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN SUGH A CONDITION THAT AN ANTIGIFATED STORM DOES NOT GARRY I8. APPROPRIATE BMP5 FOR GON5TRUGTION-RELATED GO THAT HAVE BEEN MATERIALS, WASTES SPILLS OR RESIDUES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED THAT. STANDBY MATERIALS SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON TO PREVENT EROSION OF SLOPES PROTECTED FROM EROSION USING PERMANENT FHYSIGAL STABLILZATION OR ESTABLISHED WASTES OR POLLUTANTS OFF THE SITE. DISCHARGES OF MATERIAL OTHER THAN STORMWATER ONLY WHEN AND RETAINED ON SITE TO MINIMIZE TRANSPORT FROM THE THE SITE TO STREETS, DRAINAGE FAGILITIES, OR ADJOINING MFLTTTD. VEGETATION STABILIZATION BMPS ARE NOT GONSIDERED TO BE "EXPOSED" FOR PURPOSES OF THIS NEGESSARY FOR FERFORMANGE AND COMPLETION OF GONSTRUGTION FRAGTIGES AND WHERE THEY DO NOT: GAUSE PROPERLY BY WIND OR RUNOFF. REQUIREMENT. OR GONTRIBUTE TO A VIOLATION OF ANY WATER QUALITY STANDARD: GAUSE OR THREATEN TO GAUSE POLLUTION, GONAAMINATION, OR NUISANGE: OR CONTAIN A HAZARDOUS SUBSTANGE IN A QUANTITY REPORTABLE UNDER FEDERAL REGULATIONS 40 GFR PARTS 117 $ 502. q. POTENTIAL POLLUTANTS INGLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: SOLID OR LIOUID GHEMIGAL SPILLS; WA57E5 FROM FAINTS, STAINS, SEALANTS, GLUES, LIMES, FESTIGIDES, HERBIGIDES, WOOD PRESERVATIVES AND SOLVENTS; ASBESTOS FIBERS, FAINT FLAKES OR STUGGO FRAGMENTS: FUELS, OILS, LUBRIGANTS, AND HYDRAULIC, RADIATOR OR BATTERY FLUIDS; FERTILIZERS, VEHIGLES/ EQUIPMENT WASH WATER AND GONGRETE WASH WATER; GONGRETE, DETER6ENT OR FLOATABLE WASTES; WASTES FROM ANY ENGINE/EOUIPMENT STEAM GLEANING OR GHEMIGAL DEGREASING; AND SUPER GHLORINATED POTABLE WATER LINE FLUSHING. DURING GONSTRUGTION, PERMITEE SHALL DISPOSE OF SUGH MATERIALS IN A SFEGIFIED AND GONTROLLED TEMPORARY AREA ON SITE. PHYSIGALLY SEPARATED FROM POTENTIAL STORM WATER RUNOFF, WITH ULTIMATE DISPOSAL IN AGGORDANGE WITH LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. 0. DEWATERIN6 OF GONAAMINATED GROUNDWATER, OR DISGHAR61N6 GONTAMINAAED SOILS VIA SURFAGE EROSION 15 PROHIBITED. 1;)EWATERIN(5 OF NON-GONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER REQUIRES A NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISGHAR6E ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT FROM THE RESPECTIVE 57A7E REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD. 11. GRADED AREAS ON THE PERMITTED AREA PERIMETER MUST DRAIN AWAY FROM THE FADE OF SLOPES AT THE GONGLUSION OF EACH WORKING DAY. DRAINAGE IS TO BE DIREGTED TOWARD DE51LTIN6 FACILITIE5. (253.2g)FL <- 17. ) 6 Ia.10)FL (s .06T (2g0.2)FB 0� ' (2a5.20)INV (2a4.21 WM ( 5. ) g �� Y� (2bs.lg)INV (BOB. 0)E6 I 6 ���' (2a3.24)INV I RGIAL ADJAGENT BUILDIN6 PROPERTY (502.52)FL I . ' H 6 0 .57)7G (520.40)AGX L T R ( g2)FL (2as.66)Tx N71° 2'54"E 431.90' LINE - FE G T 55-MH 2a4.g7)AG 6E OF (283.81)RIM (255.15)FL (2a .gg)AG gb.l F6 2g F6 501.2 F6 (sO .ag)E6 g 31 26)AG (2b3.lULIP E (3 .22)FL X(306.2) 6 o PA MINT (2as.O4)FL DWY _ _ (2b3.gg)FS 5 RU X(303.5)F6 3 U S.b)FB X(300 4)F6 g.73)TB (2aa.6UAG X(2g6.4)F6 (2ga.i�� (s 5a)AG X(2a5.46)Ac; X(2b6.70)AG <(2a7.b4)AG ><(2 3)F6 g4.g)F6 (285.57)7X I X(2g0.5 (2b2.g2)FL L - - J 6 (321.5a)AG X X(2a6.10AG q. F (2b3. )AG m x (2a2.g1)FL A5FHALT GONGRETE Zg X F NFI ( 17 ) 20.70)AG (2bb.b5)F5 (2gO.56) 5 (2 q.5)F6 X (2 g.6)F6 /135 (255.5q)F= Ix/ (2a8.82)F5 (2 0.55)F5 X( Ob. ( b5.1)F5 (2b5.2)FB ba.50)AG .(2g7 q)TE X( Ol.a)FC� X(50 .6)F6 X(306.5) 6 5 (285.18)6V ® X(2aq.2)F X(2g5.5)F5 X(2g4.5)F6 X( g5.a)F6 6 X( gLUFb (2gO.6g)F (50 .q)F (322.22)T5 (2a5.44)TG (2g0.g5)F5 X(s 6. )F6 s (2a2.a0)FL 24' PLM N X(50 .5)F6 (321.g1)AC. cP� PP-LP (2a5.2 (2 bA)F5 X(5 1.5)F6 J 2 F ° x #22704g5E (2b3.65)F X(2g6.5)F6 X(2g 7)F6 FHA (2a5. )AG (2q5 6)F6 X(2 4.a)F5 X 505.1)F6 (322.g2)WV (2b3.42)67E X(2a 5 X(2 1.2) 6 X(5 1.5)F �� (52 5)AG co 0 24" FL 1) ��_� X(2q7. )F 7, (284.g)F X(2q 6 GL 6' (522.g2)WV (gas. 0)AG (2b5.56)TG `� 30T6 x (2a2.7I)FL (2a3.44)F5 �� ' (515. 6 3 2. 2 .gO)A O (312\)F5 X(30g. )F6 \ 24" PLMLp C.0 3 (254.6)F X(2e < X(2 5.0)F6 Lp ao `� (2b5.3)F6 X(2aq.7)F5 X(2g. )FB _`, X(2g3.6)F6 X(2g4.2)F6 ('7g2.60)FL (2a5 7)A( 253.40)F 24" FILM (524.55)TC1�x O (2a4.7)F5 12. 6 (324.21)AG (n RIGHT OF 6 WAY LINE r , �, X(sOq.3 c- 286.5)F6 i i X(2a7.2)F6 2g0 X(2q1. )FG (2g4.0)F6 X(2q5. F6 X(2 a.2)F6 X(2bg.4)F6 .3)F6 X(2g5.2)F6 L - J 4 (x526.57)A I - � � N 0 5TE- (2a5.IB)TG _ _ ) 6 (326. (2a2.4q)FL ) X(2g4A)F6 X(2g5.5)F X(2q . )F6 x X(502.4)F X(504.2)F X(506. �\ (325.52)AG (256.0)F5 i X(2bTlF6 X(2 I.a)F6 X(2g3.5)F6 00.4)F6 X(2b .UF6 X(28g.5)F5 (2gO. 6 2a5.14) 6 GLF (327.5a)AG (2b2.16)TX G (2 I 5)T ( q3 5)TN �2g4.54)TW (2g5.g4) W ( a7 )F 78.7.Q1FCj2ab.24)F5 (2bq.6 )-5 (2aq.5)F5 ( 6.77)7W (2g7.g5)TW (2g2.2)F6 (2gg.16) W (2q4. )F6 (2g6.3)F6 (2g7.7) 6 (s 0)F6 �L4 (2b2.37)FL (2a6.1 6 gl.l7)F5 (2g2.35)F5 2gs.56 6 _ (301. )F6 X ink ��-r �, , ;�r� nI 82.20' (2g6 4)F6 6' GLF 7 M 2'2 7"E �( ,8)F5 ��'�`�' (255 2). 427.90' (2gg. )F6 (300.7)F6 - (BIOs)F6 1 ' 5.5'HE16HT END OF CHAIN LINK PROPERTY WOOD FE GE 55 2 (326.g (2bs.36)F BLOCK WALL N71M 2 54 E 2 P (526.65) G FENGI/BE&INNIN6 OF LINE WOOD FENCE I 3 .7) 6 (2a5.O0)TX as G� i INIZ PLAN 0 20 40 60 SCALE: PRELIMINARY - PLANNING SUBMITTAL GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"= 20 '-0 " MARK REVISIONS P P R D T E THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR C❑MPLIANCE WITH THE PREPARED BY. 66 MATISSE CIRCLE SEAL CITY E E LAKE E L-S I N EI R E SHEET 1 APPR❑PRIATE C❑NDITI❑NS [IF DEVELOPMENT AND/❑R CITY AND (AL ISO VIEJO, CA 92656 FESS/O PRECISE GRADING PLANS � G �_ OSTATE LAWS AND HAVE BEEN F❑UND ACCEPTABLE EEL: (949) 305-8920 � DF ` �d'zn engineering o 31800 MISSION TRAIL, LAKE ELSIN�RE, CA 92530 OPTION 1 5 OF 6 N . 0 67 X S C A L_ E 1 BENCH MARK DESIGNATION L NATION :S E-24 EROSION F SHEETS EX /3112114 A S SHOWN DISK 1.8 MI E SE ALONG BUSINESS * REM❑N HABIB, RICE No, 83156 DATE R❑NIE L DEMA ALA DATE ROUTE STATE HWY 71 FROM ATSF ILE No CITY ENGINEER %9 C 1L yt RAILROAD STATION CITY OF LAKE ELSIN❑RE �TFOF Opv- �IV DATE: 22 NOV 2019 YYEARMLEVELED881970 CONTROL PLAN ELEVATION : (1275.973 FT) Gravel Bag Berm SE-6 Concrete Waste Management WM-8 Street Sweeping and Vacuuming SE-7 Categories Categories Categories EC Erosion Control ❑x CONCRETE EC Erosion Control EC Erosion Control SE Sediment Control Q WASHOUT SE Sediment Control SE Sediment Control ❑x TC Tracking Control AREA TC Tracking Control TC Tracking Control Q WE Wind Erosion Control WE Wind Erosion Control ` ' WE Wind Erosion Control NS Non-Stormwater NS Non-Stormwater NS Non-Stormwater Management Control Management Control Management Control WM Waste Management and WM Waste Management and Q '� WM Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control -______ _ __ Materials Pollution Control Materials Pollution Control n Legend: ® ® Legend: :. 0 Z 0 Legend: Q Primary Category Q Primary Category Q Primary Objective ❑x Secondary Category ❑fc Secondary Category ❑x Secondary Objective Description and Purpose Targeted Constituents Targeted Constituents Targeted Constituents Description and Purpose Description and Purpose A gravel bag berm is a series of gravel-filled bags placed on a Sediment Q Sediment Q P P Sediment Q level contour to intercept sheet flows. Gravel bags pond sheet Nutrients Prevent the discharge of pollutants to Stormwater from Nutrients Street sweeping and vacuuming includes use of self-propelled Nutrients flow runoff,allowingsediment to settle out,and release runoff concrete waste by conducting washout onsite or offsite in a and walk-behind equipment to remove sediment from streets Trash TrashTrash Q designated area,and by employee and subcontractor training. d roadways, slowly as sheet flow,preventing erosion. Metals Metals Q anand to clean paved surfaces in preparation for Metals final paving. Sweeping and vacuuming prevents sediment from Bacteria The General Permit incorporates Numeric Effluent Limits Bacteria Bacteria Suitable Applications the project site from entering storm drains or receiving waters. Oil and Grease (NEL)and Numeric Action Levels(NAL)for pH(see Section 2 Oil and Grease Oil and Grease Gravel bag berms may be suitable: Q Organics of this handbook to determine your project s risk level and if Organics Suitable Applications Organics ■ As a linear sediment control measure: you are subject to these requirements). Sweeping and vacuuming are suitable anywhere sediment is tracked from the project site onto public or private paved es and erodible slopes Potential Alternatives Many types of construction materials,including mortar, Potential Alternatives Potential Alternatives - Below the toe of slopes P concrete stucco cement and block and their associated wastes streets and roads,typically at points of egress. Sweeping and , , vacuuming are also applicable during preparation of paved SE-1 Silt Fence None None - As sediment traps at culvert/pipe outlets have basic chemical properties that can raise pH levels outside SE-5 Fiber Roll of the permitted range. Additional care should be taken when surfaces for final paving. g• - Below other small cleared areas SE-8 Sandbag Barrier managing these materials to prevent them from coming into Limitations SE-12 Temporary Silt Dike contact with stormwater flows and raising pH to levels outside Sweeping and vacuuming may not be effective when sediment - Along the perimeter of a site the accepted range. is wet or when tracked soil is caked caked soil may need to be If User/Subscriber modifies this fact SE 14 Biofilter Bags ( y sheet in any way,the CASQA - Down slope of exposed soil areas Suitable Applications scraped loose). name/logo and footer below must be If User/Subscriber modifies this fact Concrete waste management procedures and practices are removed from each page and not - Around temporary stockpiles and spoil areas sheet in any way,the CASQA implemented on construction projects where: Implementation appear on the modified version. name/logo and footer below must be ■ Controlling the number of points where vehicles can leave - Parallel to a roadway to keep sediment off paved areas removed from each page and not ■ Concrete is used as a construction material or where the site will allow sweeping and vacuuming efforts to be - Along streams and channels appear on the modified version. concrete dust and debris result from demolition activities. focused,and perhaps save money. — too Slurries containing portland cement concrete(PCC) are too Inspect potential sediment tracking locations daily. too As a linear erosion control measure: generated,such as from saw cutting,coring,grinding, grooving,and hydro-concrete demolition. ■ Visible sediment tracking should be swept or vacuumed on - Along the face and at grade breaks of exposed and a daily basis. erodible slopes to shorten slope length and spreadam runoff as sheet flow. a (-1111111\I\11111(11•\I111 I\I II1111\IM1`•1111(\I15'\IIN May 2011 California Stormwater BMP Handbook Portal 1 of 4 November 2009 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 7 January 2011 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 2 Construction Construction Construction www.casga.org www.casga.org www.casga.org Stockpile Management WM-3 Stabilized Construction Entrance/Exit TC-1 Sanitary/Septic Waste Management WM-9 Objectives Categories Categories EC Erosion Control EC Erosion Control (] EC Erosion Control SE Sediment Control SE Sedlment Control © -- SE Sediment Control TC Tracking Control TC Tracking Control Q TC Tracking Control WE Wind Erosion Control WE Wind Erosion Control WE Wind Erosion Control NS Non-Stormwater NS Non-Stormwater —_ NS Non-Stormwater (� Management Control Management Control Management Control WM Waste Management and ✓ "t"""'' WM Waste Management and I WM Waste Management and Q Materials Pollution Control Materials Pollution Control WA • • Materials Pollution Control L.10 Y Legend: Legend: I II Legend: ✓ Primary Objective 0 Primary Objective �� Q Primary Category '� ✓ Secondary Objective x x - ❑ Secondary Objective � ❑ Secondary Category I Description and Purpose Targeted Constituents Targeted Constituents Description and Purpose Targeted Constituents Description and Purpose Stockpile Management procedures and practices are designed Sediment ✓ Sediment Q Proper sanitary and septic waste management prevent the Sediment A stabilized construction access is defined by a point of discharge of pollutants to stormwater from sanitary and septic to reduce or eliminate air and Stormwater pollution from Nutrients ✓ Nutrients g P 1'1' P Nutrients Q stockpiles of soil,paving materials such as portland cement Trash entrance/exit to a construction site that is stabilized to reduce Trash waste by providing convenient,well-maintained facilities,and Trash Q concrete(PCC)rubble,asphalt concrete(AC),asphalt concrete Metals the tracking of mud and dirt onto public roads by construction Metals arranging for regular service and disposal. Metals rubble,aggregate base,aggregate sub base or pre-mixed vehicles. Bacteria Baclerla Bacteria Q aggregate,asphalt minder(so called"cold mix"asphalt),and Suitable Applications Oil and Grease ✓ Suitable Applications 011 and Grease Oil and Grease pressure treated wood. Sanitary septic waste management practices are suitable for use Organics ✓ Use at construction sites: Organics at all construction sites that use temporary or portable sanitary Organics Q Suitable Applications and septic waste systems. Implement in all projects that stockpile soil and other ■ Where dirt or mud can be tracked onto public roads. P P J P Potential Alternatives Potential Alternatives Limitations Potential Alternatives materials. None ■ Adjacent to water bodies. None None identified. None Limitations ■ Where poor soils are encountered. None identified. Implementation ■ Where dust is a problem during dry weather conditions. Sanitary or septic wastes should be treated or disposed of in Implementation accordance with state and local requirements. In many cases, Protection of stockpiles is a year-round requirement. To Limitations one contract with a local facility supplier will be all that it takes properly manage stockpiles: ■ Entrances and exits require periodic top dressing with to make sure sanitary wastes are properly disposed. tooadditional stones.Locate stockpiles a minimum of 50 ft away from Storage and Disposal Procedures concentrated flows of stormwater,drainage courses,and • 'rhis BMP should be used in conjunction with street ■ Temporary sanitary facilities should be located away from inlets. sweeping on adjacent public right of way. drainage facilities,watercourses,and from traffic circulation. If site conditions allow,place portable facilities ■ Protect all stockpiles from stormwater runon using a ■ Entrances and exits should be constructed on level ground a minimum of 50 feet from drainage conveyances and temporary perimeter sediment barrier such as berms,dikes, only. traffic areas.When subjected to high winds or risk of high fiber rolls,silt fences,sandbag,gravel bags,or straw bale winds,temporary sanitary facilities should be secured to barriers. ! CA S C A it Stabilized construction entrances are rather expensive to prevent overturning. California construct and when a wash tack is included,a sediment trap Stormwater of some kind in List also be provided to collect wash water • • • • . Quality Anoclation 1♦I.I IIN':Iv�If IIIM111v,\111 1\111111\I\`,11 ill I l\\11 II January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 3 November 2009 California Stormwater BMP Handbook I of 6 November 2009 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 3 Construction Construction Construction www.cabmphandbooks.com www.casga.org www.casga.org 0 20 40 60 PRELIMINARY - PLANNING SUBMITTAL GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"= 20 '-0 " MARK R E V I S I ❑ N S P P R I D T E THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR C❑MPLIANCE WITH THE PREPARED BY: 66 MATISSE CIRCLE SEAL CITY [IF LAKE ELSIN❑RE SHEET 1 APPR❑PRIATE C❑NDITI❑NS OF DEVELOPMENT AND/OR CITY AND ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 P FESS/O PRECISE GRADING PLANS N STATE LAWS AND HAVE BEEN FOUND ACCEPTABLE TEL: (949) 305-8920 DEMy��� GP- 06 d'zn engineering ; I'y 31800 MISSI❑N TRAIL, LAKE ELSIN❑RE, CA 92530 6 0 67 AI I BENCH MARK: CONSTRUCTION 6 OF SHEETS EX / 1121 DESIGNATION : E-24 # AS SHOWN DISK 1.8 MILES SE ALONG BUSINESS REM❑N HABIB, RCE No. 83156 DATE R❑NIE L DEMA-ALA DATE ROUTE STATE HWY 71 FROM ATSF BMPs FILE No. CITY ENGINEER sT �P\ RAILROAD STATION CITY OF LAKE ELSIN❑RE �TF OF CAL�FO�� �\��ti DATE: 22 NOV 2019 YYEARMLEVELED881970 ELEVATION : (1275.973 FT) **IRRIGATION CONCEPT: DRIP IRRIGATION WITH SINGLE HYDROZONE PLANT LEGEND PLANTING NOTES 4, / < KEY BOTANICAL NAMES COMMON NAMES WULCOS SIZE HEKIHT WIDTH SPACI A. PLANTING PITS SHALL BE DUG WITH LEVEL BOTTOMS, THE WIDTH TWICE THE DIAMETER ZONE 4 IN m OF THE ROOTBALL SET ON NATIVE SOIL TREE EACH PLANT PIT SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH THE FOLLOWING PREPARED SOIL MIX: 2 PARTS NITROLIZED REDWOOD SHAVINGS 1 PART 'NITROHUMUS' CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS WESTERN REDBUD 3 PARTS EXCAVATED SOIL 0 LOW 24" BOX 10-18' 10-18' 20' 0 21 GRAM 'AGRIFORM' PLANTING TABLET PLANTING TABLETS SHALL BE APPLIED AS FOLLOWS: 1 TABLET PER 1 GALLON SIZE PLANT Un 2 TABLETS PER 5 GALLON SIZE PLANT 3 TABLETS PER 15 GALLON SIZE PLANT 20 16 12 g 4 0 20' 4 V 80r 0 0 LARGER PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE GIVEN ONE ( 1 ) TABLET LAURUS NOBILIS SWEET BAY LOW 24" BOX 12-40' 12-40' 40' 0 mmmmIIIIIIIl Un PER 1/2 " DIAMETER OF TRUNK CALIPER "SARATORGA" GFL SCALE SCA j w B. SOIL SHALL BE TAMPED FIRMLY AT BOTTOM OF PLANT PIT. FILL (SHADE TREE) L-i SOIL AROUND BALL OF PLANT 1/2 WAY AND INSERT PLANT TABLETS. COMPLETE VICINITY MAP BACKFILLING AND WATER IN THOROUGHLY. NOTE: ;3nyon 1%4r'e[}s PARKINSONIA PRAECOX SONORAN PALO VERDE LOW 24" BOX 20' 20' 20, 0 Ire-iN-Ou1 Burger Id N ` ALL SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER AREAS TO RECEIVE 3 DEPTH SHREDDED BARK MULCH. (CERCIDUM PRAECOX) SUBMIT SAMPLE TO CITY INSPECTOR FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION . SHRUBS/ACCENTS ------- (**)PLANT SPECIES WITH THIS MARK ARE STORM WATER FRIENDLY ��k�sFrore�rLa�L� f - 4rp CISTUS CRETICUS (SCREENING) ROCKROSE LOW 5 GALLON 3-6' 3-6' 5' 0. HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA RED YUCCA LOW 5 GALLON 3-4' 3-4' 5' 0. l fur 0Z a Q,, ANIGOZANTHOS CULTIVARS KANGAROO RED PAW LOW 5 GALLON 3' 0. #eke s�� 0) � n In o E 0** (A. FLAVIDUS) 5 2-3 �e,, r Dy e (� c cc coc., o 'v. Lake F18in©r M I I CD Q FESTUCA IDAHOENSIS FESCUE Hnt l & C Slfl — 0 Q NQ, 0 * LOW 5 GALLON 14" 10" 3 0. mare Diamond lr3 � � - o- " °; ° BOTTOM OF BASIN o � o ( ) Msp�ext � -� GROUND COVER C a " x 3: N F r LLLLLLLLL ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM YARROW LOW 1 GALLON 6" 181, 3' 0. L_L_LL_LLL_LL 0 0 N U DROSANTHEMUM FLORIBUNDUM ROSIE ICEPLANT LOW 1 GALLON 6" 5' S 0. Uo MACFADYENA UNGUIS—CATI CAT'S CLAW LOW 5 GALLON 10' 0. �j� �i Q 'PROSTRATUS' 10 0 cri0 0 w � O J Ln � r000 0 I I COMMERCIAL N7 0 ' 4A x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Q o . . . . . ".�,�," x x x x x x x x x x w..n.��� w.�.�.�� � LLLL / o LLLL L �\ �- LLLL L I I l J X LLLL LL L J o L J LLLL LL X LLLL LLL r LLLL LLL ® 0 X L LLLLL LLLLL X 00ILA [Lij [Lij [Lij [Lij [Lij [Lij X G� LLL L LL L L L LL LL LL LL LL LLL LL L 110 I O I O I O I OI a LL LLL LLLL j L LL LLLL, - LLLLLLL I I LLLL LLLLLLL LLLL / Z W LLLLLLL LLLLL 1 LLLLLLL I I ® ®®® LL LLL X LLLLL LLLLLLL I LLLL X LLLLLL I I X 13 � LLLL 0 L T \ o Q s X I I XTA U cUn X 10 I O I O I O I OI X X Y LLLLL •� �` �V 0 FUELING NOPY I 8 X X --- - --- - Q-- �-- Y LLLLLL O X LLLLL LLLLLLL ry 1 � LLLLLLL 7 X LLLL LLLLLL / J LLLL •� L _LLL LLLLLLL L L .� X L LLLL J4 LLL LLL 4,40 S I O• X X 5 X �� ���' `.� '�i ♦``II LLLLLL Lu X _ _ _ I Q uu ° X X X X ) � - - ------- -------- ------- ------- -------- ------- - �L 1� X I ° I)� _ __________________ L'---�c000000 _ ____c____c_s____c_s____c_- LLL LLLLLI` O / R � ° LLL LLLLLLL - V o LLL rn 20K UNL 87 ° ° °° LLL _Ll 10 I O I O 1 0 I OIDKUNL87 co ui U� XXX XXXXXX I L O LLB LLLL LLL l_ _ SELF SERVE + • ° LL L LLL _________ __ _LLB LL L I 7 LL LLL CAR W�4SH TUNNEL =LLLL. LUj XLLLL 7398f ' _LLI<L X I_ �j V ■ U LLLLLLLLLL _ _LLLLL ® ® ® ■ ___ _______ ________ _______ _LLLLL _ J LLLLLLLLLLL L L LLLL + LLLLLLLL LLL _ � ' �/� LLL X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X W /1000 LLLL ° ..LLLL LLLLLlLLL LLLL ` W LLLL W Ov] 0. 00 L L LLLL LLLLLLL _LLLLLL LLL L ` O L LLLLLL _LLLLLLL L LLLL mL.L j� L LLLLLLL L LLLLLLL LL LLLLLLL _LL LLLLL _LL LLLLL DATE ISSUED: LLL LLL ° .LLLLLILLL L LLL 08/08/17 LLLL LLL _LLLLL LL Y LLLLLL L Y LLLLLLLLLLLLL LL � � SCALE: Y LLLLLLLL LL LLLLLL LL LLLL LLLLL L Y LLLLLLL LLLL LL L DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: 42 .90 2'27AE 82.2O' 1 F. COHEN F. COHEN N7T02'54"E PROJECT NUMBER: 17081 ISI#9 SHEET: —F EE L.1.1 SCALE:1'=29-0' a a ROOF DECK a r m KEYNOTES GENERAL NOTES 1❑ PRE-FABRICATED COOLER WALLS, CEILING, FLOOR, DOORS AND RACKS. MAINTAIN 1. CONTRACTORS SHALL NOT SCALE THESE DRAWINGS. IN THE EVENT OF OMISSION OF 9. FIRE EXTINGUISHER: #10 CLASS ABC WITH UL RATING 4A-6OBC. SURFACE MOUNTED ON 2"AIR SPACE BETWEEN COOLER AND ADJACENT WALLS PER MANUFACTURES NECESSARY DIMENSIONS THE CONTRACTORS SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT WALL WITH MANUFACTURERS ALL STEEL WALL BRACKET. JL INDUSTRIES INC. (COSMIC 10E) SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY DIMENSIONS WITH PROJECT MANAGER. OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH INSPECTION TAG AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL CODES. MANAGER. 4 i i 2. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS, AND SITE GRADES PRIOR 10. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL COAT HOOKS FOR EMPLOYEES. REFERENCE SHEET EF1 ITEM 220. A2.3 i i I 2❑. MOP SINK; REFERENCE PLUMBING. TO START OF WORK. INSTALL 2 IN OFFICE AND 3 IN BACKROOM. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED BY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER. SEE DOOR HARDWARE SCHEDULES. U) 3❑. PROVIDE SPACE FOR RECESSED BOX IN WALL FOR CO2 LINES AND PVC CONDUIT 3. VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION, AND CHARACTERISTICS, OF ALL WORK AND EQUIPMENT TO BE FOR POST MIX AND SLURPEE MACHINES. FURNISHED BY OWNER OR OTHERS, WITH THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER BEFORE ANY 11. APPLY 3M SUN CONTROL WINDOW FILMS @ ALL SOUTH, EAST, AND WEST FACING GLASS 0 o CONSTRUCTION PERTAINING TO SAME IS BEGUN. (3M-1). NOTE NO FILM SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE STOREFRONT DOORS. (REFERENCE - a 4❑ ELECTRICAL PANELS; REFERENCE ELECTRICAL SHEETS. SHEET A6.1 FOR MATERIALS SCHEDULE). V)_ N 4. ALL EXTERIOR WALL DIMENSIONS ON THE PLANS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ARE TO > w 5❑ STEEL COLUMN; REFERENCE STRUCTURAL SHEETS. OUTSIDE FACE OF SIP, CMU BLOCK OR STRUCTURAL SHEATHING. 12. G.C. TO FURNISH AND INSTALL RIS BACKBOARD AT ISP DESK. REFERENCE MATERIALS Lv SCHEDULE ON SHEET A6.1. 6❑ DOWNSPOUT; REFERENCE ELEVATIONS SHEET A3.1. 5. 2"AIR SPACE BETWEEN COOLER WALL AND BUILDING WALL, OR ANY EQUIPMENT ADJACENT TO COOLER. WALK-IN COOLER SUPPLIED BY 7-ELEVEN, INC, INSTALLATION TO BE DETERMINED BY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL WALL BACKING FOR WALL HUNG FIXTURES AND TOILET ACCESSORIES. WALL LEGEND 7. ALL WOOD IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE MUST BE PRESSURE TREATED, MOISTURE RESISTANT WOOD. PREFABRICATED COOLER METAL STUD WALL w WALL 8. MAXIMUM EFFORT TO OPERATE DOORS SHALL NOT EXCEED: 5.0 L.B.F. FOR INTERIOR a SUBSTRATE PER PLAN SIPS PANEL WALL DOORS. � COOLER WALL 9. ALL DOORS SHALL BE KEYLESS IN DIRECTION OF EGRESS. COOLER/ z a FREEZER U co rn o v 6r Q A3.1 a c� rn o U c IEEU TOP OF CONC 13 2 3 OCOOLER/ FREEZER WALL E A7.o 68'-1" ELECTRICAL 0 ~�3 N >_ 91 6'-6 1/4" 5'-10" 5'-10 1/4" 35'-7 1/4" 7'-11" 5'-5 3/4" 107 N 0 N 0 7" 2" b 2" 6 6 cV ROOF DECK ROOF DECK U °' 0__ - cn U a� FREEZE N �� / > ICE 3 3 3 4 (� o Z 109 D D 108 M A4:0 I MEN' I C1O co ` . A S I w 17 � �� � o D E 106 p A7.0 co 5� 1 � r J A2.1 I I N � � A B.O. CEILING A F.E. 1 q SCHEDULED CEILING N METAL TOP TRACK 4„ 2" METAL STUD FRAMING 8'-8 11/16" 9'-1 1/8" 37'-9 11/16" 1 7'-10 7/8" 4'-11 9/16" PER WALL TAG BELOW SUBSTRATE PER PLAN EXISTING 3 S�� I A STRUCTURE/ ■ EXTERIOR PARTITION/ A4.0 I WOMEN'S OR TENANT MTL STUD FRAMING STOREFRONT WALL EXTERIOR SOUND BATT INSULATION SUBSTRATE OR TENANT E I 105 I CDC TOTE @ RESTROOM ONLY PER PLAN WALL A 111 A COOLER/ 14 FREEZER _ i NA7.0F ... � � I MERCHANDISE METAL STUD TRACK M ATTACHED W/ FASTENERS ti A3.0 2 101 N A L O 24" O.C. MAX. ti N TOP OF CONC TOP OF CONC A3.1 A 3'-6 O3-5/8" MTL. STUDS p COOLER/ FREEZER WALL 2'-6" 7'-11" MIN. O AGAINST WALL COOLER VAULT � r ROOF DECK ROOF DECK 110 104 0 co O M I Z BACKROOM 104 N cr.) 7-7 17 A V / j A7.0 � rN Z 04 I'Q1 I'Q1 5� SA ES 3 F.E. 4.0 B.O. CEILING Ell( 2 U l i i t i i 103 4 A7.0 ■ ■ ■ O j j I SCHEDULED CEILING j j SCHEDULED CEILING SIM SIM. A METAL TOP TRACK 13 7 4 5 cQ 7 A7.0 A7.0 A7.0 A7.0 A7.0 OFFICE O O D \ BELOW z METAL STUD FRAMING METAL STUD FRAMING A•1 N F.E. - 5 5 OH 103 PER WALL TAG BELOW PER WALL TAG BELOW O 1 LL A ZSUBSTRATE PER PLAN SUBSTRATE PER PLAN L � O 1 O 101 A J 2 AU c, O Lu Lu EXTERIOR A4.0 A4.0 W0.00 MTL STUD FRAMING OR TENANT i i MTL STUD FRAMING O r Q MWALL j SOUND BATT INSULATION I 8'-2" 7'-4" a- J @ RESTROOM ONLY 7" 2' 16-8 1/2" 35'-4" 16'-0 1/2" DATE ISSUED: -7 Ilk l i i t 14 i i 14 25-9 1/2" 17'-5" 24'-10 1/2" 08/08/17 L i A7.0 A7.0 68'-1" SCALE: I I I I I DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: METAL STUD TRACK i i METAL STUD TRACK 1 F. COHEN F. COHEN ATTACHED W/ FASTENERS ATTACHED W/FASTENERS PROJECT NUMBER: 24"O.C. MAX. 24"O.C. MAX. A3.0 TOP OF CO TOP OF CONC 17081 3-5/8" MTL. STUDS 3-5/8" MTL. STUDS A B ISI#9 A.6 6" MTL. STUDS 1 S 1.2 2 SHEET: N U2') WALL TYPES FLOOR PLAN A2 . 0 1 1" = V-O" 1/4" = 1'-0" NOTE: REFERENCE A2.2 FOR WALL FINISH AND SUBSTRATE TYPES. 7 43 SIP - RIGHT 12 8 15 13 3 1 COLOR +28'-6" A. BEHR SILVER SHADOW #N510-1 T.O. TOWER B. BEHR PINCIL SKETCH #N500-4 C. BEHR 10OMPH #P170-7 D. BEHR CARBON #520-7 +24'-0" T.O. PARAPET 4 MATERIAL z C 1. SMOOTH FINISH STUCCO u� +20'-O" 1 2. ACM SHEET METAL Li W T.O. PARAPET 3. 2° ALUMINUM REVEAL 12 4. PREFAB FOAM STUCCO FINISH TOP CORNICE 18"H STUCCO w OVERHANG TRIM Bw 5. 6° PREFAB FOAM STUCCO FINISH TRIM o 5 6. 12° W PREFAB STUCCO FINISH TRIM w D 7. PREFAB FOAM STUCCO FINISH TOP CORNICE 14 w CD8. 1/2" TEMPERED GLASS STORE FRONT GLAZING WITH 2° ALUM. o 0 ® * TRIM 1 9. 3X7 SOLID METAL DOOR a 0 z ,q 10. METAL AWNING WITH SUSPENDED CABLE. 101, r7 O 1 1 11. POP ADVERTISING SIGNAGE (SEPARATE PERMIT) U � co N o N M o v o� I I _ CD * 12. ILLUMINATED 7-ELEVEN SIGNAGE (SEPARATE PERMIT) 0 o ' 13. 3'X7' ALUMINUM DOOR WITH 1/4" TEMPERED GLASS CAR 3 WASH — c �/) C p X 14. WALL PACK LED LIGHTING N �- `\ 1 15. ELECTRICAL PANELS 0 ' 16. CMU BLOCK WALL AGAINST ADJACENT BUILDING U cn i Q Cn MATERIAL U °' WEST ELEVATION * t-;r `. E co COLOR +24'-0" +24'-0" 00 w� J T.O. PARAPET T.O. TOWER 4 o � N C +20'-0" +20'-0" 1 T.O. PARAPET T.O. PARAPET A �F 7 —1 (1 6� � 12 - - - - - - - - - -I -1 - - �- - - - - - - - - -� - - - - - - - — D ■ ■ 14 7L7 IIIIII-F A wj cf) � 1 ` A \ 9 \\ 3 A * B 0 Q NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION 0 co rk J INZ w Aik +24'-0 _ T.O. TOWER 4 I ca C — Q Q 1 cow A00 _ Q E� 12 O U F —1z 0 B cf) W CCU 5 ® ® 0 C!) Lu 0 D U ® w — - - w0. 00 Lu O 14 OT Q a: ® ® * co J 1 DATE ISSUED: A 08/08/17 1 SCALE: 15 A DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: F. COHEN F. COHEN 3 PROJECT NUMBER: 17081 * IS1#9 1 SHEET: +0'-0" B EAST ELEVATION A.2.1 a 126'-8" ol } m 1'-4" 1ol '-4" 25'-4" 5'-1" 6. 3'-6" L, 5'-5" Le 10'-8" I v, 10'-8" Le Le 10'-8" Ll I v, 10'-8" 10'-8" Ll I v, 10'-8" 7'-2" v 3'-6" L, 6'-0" ol 16'-7" 8'-9'1 ol 10 (O O z - J 4- un I VACUUM ROO)k - OLd _ w 00 CAD a' CONCRETE P�1D RESTROO Ll CV - ------------ - -- = o VENDING o o VENDING o I M J"O HOT/WATER o MACHINE GLASS BLOCK WALL o MACHINE � w w w ---------------------- o 0 OI 1 a B.S g"S ---- ---- y„G i STRIP DRAM 0a I 1 I 1 z = I I CAR WASH TUNNEL = o I 1 I 1 I 1 00 c0 cv O o o U 00 ��n SLOPE 3% I SLOPE 3% "= N U 60NVEYER TRENC / 0 o� 0 i i p U '^ •� X x x VJ W ~� t{/ LPL Ll- N _-A O ISAWCUT LINES J"0 WATER J"O WATER _ o eLq -\ (3) 1" ELECTRICAL CONDUITS GLASS BLOCK WALL '`� 2'_0" 0 0 0 L. 4'_0" --- — C? Q "0 HOT/WATER ----------------------- _ E � � ;� � tho CAR WASH STORAGE OFFICE o V x n 00 00 D CONCRETE PAD CD OPERATION I1771 O N x x RESTROOM x I O o STUB UP HOT/COLD � "-' ^ LP WATER FOR WASHE PROVIDE ELECTRICAL AND N a VENT FOR DRYER 4'-102° 10'-811 10'-811 10'-811 10'-811 10'-811 6'-0" 10'-711 8-211 11'-11" ■ 32'-51" 1'-4" 1'-4" 69'-61" 1 2 2 30'-8" ol x I 132'-8" DOOR SCHEDULE o 0 DESCRIPTION - 3'X 7' ALUMINUM DOOR W/ WEATHER-STRIPPING & 10" KICK PLATE HINGES 1 1/2 PR. 4 1/2 x 4 1/2 BUTT HINGES (FIX PIN) OHARDWARE ADAMS RITE MAXIMUM SECURITY HOOK LOCK 14'-0" 8'-8" HANDLES PULL HANDLE (EXTERIOR)-PUSH BAR (INTERIOR) DOOR CLOSER: INTERNATIONAL #54 ALUMINUM FINISH 26'_ 1" THRESHOLD PEMKO #200-5AV X 6' ALUMINUM 2201-0" MN� FINISH ALUMINUM ANODIZED 19,_�},1�" MISC. 1/4" TEMPERED CLEAR PLATE GLASS "L 41-0" 31-4" ol o co T NOTE: ALL EXTERIOR DOORS MUST BE "KEYED" ACCESSIBLE FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS FOR S2 THE FIRE DEPARTMENT 0 DESCRIPTION 3'X 7' HOLLOW CORE METAL DOOR 6p HINGES 1 1/2 PR. 4 1/2 x 4 1/2 BUTT HINGES HARDWARE SCHLAGE�THOOR CLOSER: INTERNATIONAL ALUUMINUM6D (LEVEL HANDLES) q,_4 O FINISH PAINT TO MATCH WALL C� ^^ 1..� DESCRIPTION 3'X 7' HOLLOW CORE METAL DOOR `" O HINGES 1 1/2 PR. 4 1/2 x 4 1/2 BUTT HINGES �V ©HARDWARE SCHLAGE OLYMPIAD D50 PD-26D (LEVEL HANDLES) O DOOR CLOSER: INTERNATIONAL #54 ALUMINUM Tmm THRESHOLD PEMKO-#200-5AVx36" W/ VINYL SWEEP #307-AV O O FINISH PAINT TO MATCH WALL _ = N I Q J DESCRIPTION 3'X 7' FIBERGLASS DOOR w/WEATHER STRIPPING OHINGES : 1 1/2 PR. 4 1/2 x 4 1/2 BUTT HINGES OFFICE V J HARDWARE SCHLAGE OLYMPIAD D50 PD-26D (LEVEL HANDLES) _ j DOOR CLOSER: INTERNATIONAL #54 ALUMINUM THRESHOLD PEMKO-#200-5AVx36" W/ VINYL SWEEP #307-AV Q x � FINISH FIBERGLASS GRAY PER MANUFACTURE MISC 1/4" TEMPERED GLASS (HALF TOP DOOR) co I rn O �1`14 DON sk Silz STOREFRONT NOTES _ to F07 ® ® 1. STOREFRONT. AL. FRAME AS MANUFACTURED BY VISTAWALL OR EQ., SERIES PER GLAZING REQMTS., 2" X 4 1/2 FRONT LOADED GLAZING, w/ CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FINISH, ALTERNATE AND EQUIVALENT A I I _j STOREFRONT FRAME AS MANUFACTURED BY U.S. ALUMINUM OR OTHER AS APPROVED BY CHEVRON v REPRESENTATIVE. oe 4'-0" 4'-0" z 0 ui 2. STANDARD STOREFRONT GLAZING SHALL BE 1/4" CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS. (TYP.) ol 6'-8" 16'-0" 11 8'-0" ol 10 W Y 3. VERIFY ALL WINDOW SIZES IN FIELD PRIOR TO FABRICATION. Ile 30'-8" ) r 4. GLAZING AND STOREFRONTS SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS. GLAZING MATERIAL 0' THICKNESS, AND LAMINATION AND/OR MULLION DESIGN IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE. co 2ndDATE ISSUED: 08/08/17 FLOOR PLAN NOTES SCALE: 1. 3 1/2" MIN. ACOUSTIC BATT INSULATION REQUIRED IN ALL RESTROOM WALLS AND CEILING. 2. WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD, OR CMU. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: FLOOR SINK DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF SLAB U.N.O. F. COHEN F. COHEN 3. ACCESSIBILITY DESIGN STANDARD: A.D.A. TITLE 24 CBC 2013 PROJECT NUMBER: 4. ALL SEALANT TO BE PAINTABLE. 17081 5. ALIGN EXTERIOR FACE OF PLYWOOD AND FOUNDATION FACE OF CONCRETE (TYP.). 6. ALIGN DOWEL JOINTS W/ TILE LAYOUT. FOR TILE LAYOUT AND SPECIFICATIONS, SEE SHEET A07. S I#9 7. ALL WOOD FRAMING MEMBERS IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE OR CMU SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED DOUGLAS FIR U.O.N. TYP. SHEET: 8. COUNTERS FOR PASS-THRU WINDOWS AND TRANSACTION STATIONS SHALL BE 28"-34" HIGH AND 36" MIN. WIDE 9. IN OTHER THAN DWELLING UNITS, TOILET ROOM FLOORS SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH, HARD, NONABSORBENT CWA.1.1 SURFACE SUCH AS PORTLAND CEMENT, CONCRETE, CERAMIC TILE OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIAL WHICH EXTEND UPWARD ONTO THE WALLS AT LEAST 4 INCHES. WALLS WITHIN 24 INCHES OF THE SERVICE SINKS, WATER CLOSETS AND URINALS SHALL BE SIMILARLY FINISHED TO A HEIGHT OF 48 INCHES AND, EXCEPT FOR STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS, THE MATERIALS USED IN SUCH WALLS SHALL BE TYPE WHICH IS NOT ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY MOISTURE. (CBC 1210.2.2) 1 8 5 A * D +27'-0" r m T.O. TO R (VARIES) 7 4 C C 1 3 1 8 15 5 12 2 17 1 1 B * A * C D B C * A A +20'- T.O. ROOF 12 0 O u� B Berri Bros / 5 > w W 5 D � LLJ D 17 A R ASH 11 * 1111 w 3 Llj CD w Al /z / r / CD o B Z a r- �o E (� 00 co N o c� m o C) SOUTH ELEVATION (PAYPOINT AREA) 0 Q m Q o COLOR dh +27'-0" J T.O. TOWER VARIES c Q) o � A. BEHR SILVER SHADOW #N510-1 B. BEHR PINCIL SKETCH #N500-4 5 rl 12 C 0 0 D A B `� C. BEHR 100MPH #P170-7 * q ) +20'-0" 15 1 2 6 n D. BEHR CARBON #520-7 T.O. TOWER * A C C 12 7 MATERIAL B 2 2 2 17 ti Q 1. SMOOTH FINISH STUCCO 2. ACM SHEET METAL O Ln 00 3. 2" ALUMINUM REVEAL 3 0A WA S/ r N 4. PREFAB FOAM STUCCO FINISH TOP CORNICE 18"H STUCCO 17 14 OVERHANG TRIM 1E X I T A A 5. 6" PREFAB FOAM STUCCO FINISH TRIM 6. 12" W PREFAB STUCCO FINISH TRIM 7. PREFAB FOAM STUCCO FINISH TOP CORNICE A +2 T. TOWER q 4 8. 1/2" TEMPERED GLASS STORE FRONT GLAZING WITH 2" ALUM. J�e 15 1�e C TRIM * 7 9. 3X7 SOLID METAL DOOR CAR WASH SIGNAGE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT 1 10. METAL AWNING WITH SUSPENDED CABLE. WEST ELEVATION (EXIT) A 1 6 2 +20'-0" 4 11. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING - MS METAL SALES - 12 A C C T.O. ROOF C PROLOC II ICC#: ER-5912 17 2 2 2 B 12 12. HORIZONTAL METAL SIDING BY: MS METAL SALES ICC#: * C D A B ER-5912 5 13. SO ALUMINUM DOOR WITH 1/4" TEMPERED GLASS CAR D WASH +12'-0" 2 14. STEEL CANOPY COLUMNS B.O. OVERHANG 14 17 C 15. OVERHEAD DOORS (OPEN DURING OPERATION) A * 3 16. CAR WASH ITEMS VENDING MACHINES. 8 * 17. SIGNAGE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT A MATERIAL 0 0 COLOR / O > -0'-6" A Co W NZLO J CV W EAST ELEVATION (ENTRANCE)Jk 0 ca +27'-6" I � U Q T.O. TOWER _ 4 1 8 31 2 11 :E O U * * A C A 1 A +20'-0" 4 ® ® vJ W T.O. R O-Q F C w a)12 8 � ® 0 B * 12 Lu 5 B W0. 0 D 5 0 T Q +12'-0" B.O. OVERHANG 17 DATE ISSUED: * 08/08/17 * 3 SCALE: VENDING VENDING DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: A 16 1 F. COHEN F. COHEN PROJECT NUMBER: f/p17081 Ll uji IL I I do ISI#9 / + -0 ; L_____J ; SHEET: 0' NORTH ELEVATION (VACUUM AREA) CWA.2.1 a r 22'-4" 22'-4" 22'-4" m a — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — o 8'-6" 13'-10" 11'-2" 11'-2" 13'-10" 8'-6" --- ---------- --------- a a a o � i o� to u� O O O O O I z z cn w I I I I I I I I o I o I M I M w Q .. a I z m r-- r-)cD E U co co O N Mo U 0 U mm O 0 O O O O O O J .. X CD YJ I-- O p N CD m I I Uo I ti I o I 10 o `erJ ^ ^ Ln 0,0 2'-0' ol NEW WHITE ACM FASCIA WITH 711 STRIPES (TYP. ALL SIDES) I I I I I I I I I I (n NEW WHITE CANOPY NEW WHITE CANOPY COLUMN COLUMN L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ■ CANOPY FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" NEW DISPENSER L L J TEMEM' — SOUTH ELEVATION o < NORTH ELEVATION OPPOSITE SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" I z OO L N Q ORANGE STRIPE Tm- O GREEN STRIPE NEW WHITE ACM FASCIA WITH " I (Q Lu LRED STRIPE 711 STRIPES (TYP. ALL SIDES) u0m (o u J u 0) 20 >- NEW 36" DI . ® ® J Q "BB" BUG (TYP. OF 3) O NEW 36" 711 SIGN z O U W Q w pp o rQ U fr co DATE ISSUED: `? 08/08/17 SCALE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: F. COHEN F. COHEN PROJECT NUMBER: 17081 IS1#9 SHEET: WEST ELEVATION CA.1.1 EAST ELEVATION OPPOSITE (STRIPE ONLY) SCALE: 1/4 =1 —0 a \ a I in 17 N7T 2' ■ ` o " " " o /� r-----I e -I J /IV 0 rN _j a \ \ 1 14 (n ti 0 (n cr ti _ U W r—r----------------------------z— IF- —� — ----- •..I L---- 4 �`� sa 5 ' � \ W o I �O \ mr %�l• r I I �7 ' Z oII'xv i 0 cw) 0 0 0 cw) 0 O 0 cw)0 O \� I I AK \!O \ \ o iv' •' I I 8 " • I X \� u I x O // / ====a====a====a====a====a==== Z a I� R i01�,. Illllpl � I I • ____________ __ __________ y O E 70- 00 - - - - - - - -4— E Ir J) LO n„ o00000000I iI I 20K UNL. 87 SELF SERVE � vo � I I aT - CAR WASH TUNNEL I I � L--------------------------------J F/i I .. /iX/nua .• Berri Bros \\ \ 0 0 i v 11S j1j11111 I I _ '• I I \ �/ > co L i � W ® ,•, 1 --- 00 0 E3 E3 A N N71°02'5A r- N71°02'27AE 82.207 5 N PLOT PLAN SCALE: 1"=20'-0" 79—O» $1-0. SIGN SCHEDULE 1'-0" 6'-0' 1'-0" 01 NO. DESCRIPTION ILLUM. STATUS AREA QTY. TOTAL 1 CANOPY SIGN YES NEW 15.0 1 15.0 2 MONUMENT SIGN YES NEW 62.0 1 62.0 3 MONUMENT SIGN YES NEW 48.0 1 48.0 4j 4 WALL SIGN YES NEW 96.0 1 96.0 5 WALL SIGN YES NEW 60.0 1 60.0 NOW OPE11 M RED METAL CABINET M 6 WALL SIGN YES NEW 28.0 1 28.0 4j" ELEVEn LED MESSAGE BOARD 7 WALL SIGN YES NEW 138.0 1 138.0 8 WALL SIGN YES NEW 95.0 1 95.0 - TOTAL SIGN: 542.Osf 42 4 ALUMINUM SILVER METAL TRIM BLACK OPAQUE BACKGROUND RED ILLUMINATED CANNEL LETTERS of 3'—0» 00, 3'—0» 00, WHITE TRANSLUCENT LETTER 00 ON BLACK OPAQUE BACKGROUND CV RED TRANSLUCENT RING 1 C A N O PY F A S C I A S I G N A G E ON BLACK OPAQUE BACKGROUND SCALE: 1"=1'-0" 1'-0"9" 6'-0" 9"1'-0" 10'4 7'-3" (0j 3'-9 " 5'-1 ALUMINUM SILVER METAL BASE of r— Z N OQ Q Self Serve Gasoline I BLACK OPAQUE BACKGROUND a S h red i t/Debit WH TRANSLUCENT LETTER O WHITE TRANSLUCENT LETTER Regular Regular II ON BLACK OPAQUE BACKGROUND 3 CAR WASH MONUMENT SIGN N c� >, , ON BLACK OPAQUE BACKGROUND I ® ®®� ®®� RE LED PRICING SCALE: 1/2-0' /2 =1 —0 LO Z RED TRANSLUCENT RING ��O 6'-0" 15'-6" Z �y X fOSS � � ON BLACK OPAQUE BACKGROUND Plus Plus � Q! � �o ®o®® ®® c 0 bA WA SH I _ Q WHITE BACKGROUND Premium Premium to � 1 ORANGE STRIPEmp L__ —®o®® ®® of 6erri Bros GREEN STRIPE co o i N ELEVEN LU �° `� �� W RED STRIPE-------- Diesel #2 Diesel #2 co i i GR EN LED PRICING 0 STUCCO FINISH ■ ■ n 0 ,,---CA R A S H 21'-6" 2'-6" 4'-6" 2'-6" O _j 0. Zo LU 6 LOGO WALL SIGN O 7 CAR WASH WALL SIGN SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0' 8 CAR WASH WALL SIGN SCALE: 1/4"=1'—o' U W SCALE: 3 8"=1'-0" W O 0.00 ` / Y rQ 2 MONUMENT SIGN � J SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0' WHITE BACKGROUND DATE ISSUED: ORANGE STRIPE 08/08/1 7 WHITE BACKGROUND 11 SCALE: ORANGE STRIPE > n M o Ell �L5�U�� GREEN STRIPE ih DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: MGREEN STRIPE ❑ RED STRIPE F. COHEN F. COHEN PROJECT NUMBER: aRED STRIPE 17081 32'-0" I S I#9 SHEET: 20'-0" SN.1.1 5 C—STORE WALL SIGN 4 C—STORE WALL SIGN SCALE: 1 2"=1'-0" �yt �• A __- ME OMENS �r 1 100010101� E � s� r �• • rIw•iilliiiiiiiiiiiliiiiiiliAfliilw N!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!w r!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!w!!!i!!!!!w!!!!!!1 rrI rr.rrr rrrrr,rrI rr•rrr!!!i i!!!nrrr•lMrr!!!i irrrr•lrri rIr rrrm!m ri!!MAN!!!!!!!!!!w!!!w!!!w!!!i!!!!1 m!!!!!!w!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!w!m ra!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!i!!!!!!!i!!!!I _ w!!i!!!w!!!!!i!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!i!� ■!!!!!!!!i!!!!!!!!!!!!!!w!!!!!!!!1 . lrrrlrlri!!lMrrrlrrrrrl•rrwlMrrrrNlMlrMrrir�Mrrlrrilrrt!!!i� a. !!!!!!!i!!!!!!!!!i!i iwii!!liiiiiiiiiiw!!1 !!!!!w!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!w!M a� IMEWMM ER MMMMIMwrMl MrMMM�MA•ilM�MMArMMMA•iMw!liMrlrMAilMr -- lii!!!!i!!r�!!!!liiiliii!!liiiil '�- Y'. A!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!� !!i!!!i!!!illi=ili!!!!!1 .• !!!!!!!!!!i!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!i!� :0 IMERMEN M■!!!!ram M ram!! ENENEN !!!rEM�MMMMAAMMAM�M�MMAr�!!!r�MI< m!!!!!!w!!!!!i!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ER ^!. �J= i a it � � l ■ �■ n ' ■ i ■ •tea 1 ��•~ ..�--- 1 it � �_ - ■. r!:.� �N.. "••UTH B-EVAMON WAYPCWr "I Am� WEST • - EAST - 4 1 ■ C� - NORTH ELEVATION CVACWM _ ■r�I�,N . ■ SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION OPPOSITE SCALE: 1/4'=1'-0' t;L�fl IL I i WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION OPPOSITE (STRIPE ONLY) SCALE: 1/4'-1'-0" OEB� U ,? 31800 MISSION TRAIL, LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA COLOR BOARD and SITE AMENITIES PACKAGE Imperial Stations Gas Station and Convenience Store 31800 Mission Trail Lake Elsinore, CA. April 7, 2020 Prepared by: COW"%JCOW" 0qm..�.4s140 Design Planning Permitting . r] 22485 La Palma Avenue, Suite 202 Yorba Linda, CA 92887 P: 714.920.9643 F: 714.917.0250 www.cjccorp.com Prepared for: City of Lake Elsinore, CA 1. Exterior Finishes A. Smooth Finish Stucco La Habra Stucco 678 B. Corrugated Wall MS Metal Sales or equal www.metalsales.us.com r ,'•r3' Corrugated 2-21T CJC Design , Inc . x C. Acrylic Composite Metal Panels (ACM) — Canopy fascia cede, -a C. Standing Seam metal roof MS Metal Sales or equal www.metalsales.us.com 12"TT ar IIr Coveraga ll. Paint Colors Behr A. N510-1 SILVER SHADOW B. N500-4 PENCIL SKETCH Design ,CJC ..._ C. N520-7 CARBON D. Pl 70-7 100 MPH III. Hardscape at driveways L.M. Scofield Company 6533 Bandini Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90040 P: 800.800.9900; F: 323.720.3033 www.scofield.com Scofield Concrete — Padre Brown (Lithochrome Chemstain) y IV. Site Lighting LSI Industries LED Yard light LSI Slice (XLCS) 4e!: V. Window Glazing Tubelite Anodized Aluminum Glazing #14000 series 1/0 VI. Awnings A. Metal Awning Wall Section MMRIOR Ma 5ML WALL CLEAT 1 1/2'STEM ROD VL w STEED SASE CZL:AT rr T,C). FOREFRONT VANE-5 PER� N STEEL AWNING � 1. ALL SREEL TO Bt WNT` ,JTYP.� AT A7rACHMU%f5 B. MeralAwning Plan CHANNEL lei Uk I OFAATEO �+rtt -5rMN [516E ITEM 8 srr-EL CHmf FOR MORE LNFO.) aGLTZ0 To WALL I5EfDE�AILJ '!� '!_ — — ...� _ TT �1L-HA1�E�'STEAL ,� IL 913 �ee48�0 yew AA0O9aa STM E CLEAT T rara .mee�4I4 �aooaoaaoo W/1 1{2" D106- NSKDN onuuunnnuep .00aoaa000ao11 DETAUQ EQUAL EQUAL Design , C. Metal Awning Connection At Storefront UNf OF BUILD14 BLOCKING AT FOOD AND METAL STUD WALLS 1 it DuL mey kL Bovr AT EACH EN D CHANNEL WTH DQU0LE NUT AT CRAM ME r FLUSK FINISH i.TTOP OF STOREFRONT ONT I 0. Metal A wfiirrg Fascia I I r X 1 j8'(3 ALV. STEEL 1!?"W. ROD -THREAD ANGLE. MM & BUTT TO 31W DIA;,A5 SHOWN WILD CORNER 16 ,. PERFORATED SKEET METAL SCREEN -- 3/5 A, PIN 0 1 r o.0 MC SX20 STEEL CHANHEL AT ALL FOUR 106 ~ti 1 CJC Design , Inc . .� I E. L .71f Clear At Met.?tAviming CONVACTION PER MUCTLI AL o f ti 6A%E PLATE 11�.RjkT'� kEVATpN -5 LINl�OF FIN H Easio C lea t At Moto)Awning i IfT M.STEEL ROO CLINS rye,s 1a, TOP L 1110TTOh 2" Dkk PICA W/NUT ON _ ONE SME. Co l f el e 31-C SATE 1N" 2 Ulu PIN HW . b. = WELD Pit 57FdJC L LM- TOP OF Cki NEL AND TUBE 2 7/8' 14\e--j114 Design ,CJC ..._ . TY L E R LLP�Bu���R�SLC�Hi, ISORS REPLY TO: Riverside County Office: Orange County Office: 25026 Las Brisas Road 17875 Von Karman Avenue,#150 Murrieta,California 92562 Irvine,California 92614 Telephone: (951)600-2733 Telephone: (714)978-2060 Facsimile: (951)600-4996 Facsimile: (714)922-8241 August 12, 2021 Via Electronic Mail and U.S. Mail City of Lake Elsinore Attn: Justin Kirk, Damaris Abraham and Jason Simpson 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 j kirk(k Lake-El s inore.org dabrahamkLake-Els inore.org jsiMpson@Lake-Elsinore.org Re: STORYBOOK PRESCHOOL/BERRI BROTHERS PROJECT PLANNING APPLICATION NO: 2017-62 Mr. Kirk, Ms. Abraham and Mr. Simpson: This office represents Storybook Preschool(the"Preschool")in all matters relating to the proposed construction of a gas station, convenience store and car wash on the property adjoining the preschool. Please direct all correspondence to the undersigned. We are in receipt of the City of Lake Elsinore (the "City") Planning Commission Public Hearing Notice (the "Notice") wherein it is stated that 18 fueling stations, a convenience store and a self- service car wash is proposed within feet of the Preschool's play areas. The Notice states that the project is Categorically Exempt from CEQA as an Infill Development under section 15332. Significantly, 15332 states that"Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality." CEQA 15332. In the present case, the City will be unable to make such a statement as it has not adequately evaluated the project impacts to/from, but not limited to, aesthetics, noise, traffic, biological resources, geological resources/soils, land use/planning, and health risks/air quality, among other things. Further, it has failed to disclose traffic noise during hours of peak use where the nature of the Project use means most traffic is generated during limited hours and not averaged throughout the day. CEQA requires that the cumulative impacts of a project be addressed when the project's incremental effect is cumulatively considerable. (California Code of Regulations, tit. 14 §15130(a).) Cumulative impacts are impacts on the environment that result from the incremental impacts of a proposed action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future www.tylerbursch.com tfrahm@tylerbursch.com To: City of Lake Elsinore/Planning August 12, 2021 Page 2 Re: Planning Application No. 2017-62 actions (California Code of Regulations, tit. 14 § 15355(b).) Such impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant actions taking place over time. CEQA establishes a duty on the part of the lead agency to mitigate all significant environmental impacts. (Public Resources Code § 21002, 21002.1; California Code of Regulations, tit. 14 §15021(a).) A lead agency may not approve a project for which there are significant environmental impacts unless the agency finds that: (a) mitigation measures have been required of the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects, or(b) mitigation measures are found to be infeasible based on substantial evidence. (Public Resources Code § 21081; California Code of Regulations, tit. 14 § 15091.) A categorical exemption may not be used for an activity if a reasonable possibility exists that the activity will have a significant environmental effect because of unusual circumstances. Petitioners using this exception to attack a categorical exemption must show both that (1) "unusual circumstances" exist and (2) these unusual circumstances create the "reasonable possibility" of a significant environmental impact. Projects within certain classes are not categorically exempt if they occur within certain sensitive environments. A project in these classes is not categorically exempt if it may affect an "environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern"that is designated,mapped, and adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. 1 California Environmental Law & Land Use Practice § 21.06 (2020) With certain exceptions, CEQA requires public agencies to prepare an EIR for any"project"they intend to carry out or approve which may have a significant effect on the environment. Under CEQA section 21065, " `[p]roject' means an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment . . . ."Laurel Heights II(1993) 6 Cal. 4th 1112, 1123. As stated in Wildlife Alive v. Chickering, an early high court decision construing CEQA section 21084, the Resources Agency"is empowered to exempt only those activities which do not have a significant effect on the environment. It follows that where there is any reasonable possibility that a project or activity may have a significant effect on the environment, an exemption would be improper." Subsequent case law has stated that"[t]o implement th[is] rule laid out in Chickering, Guidelines section 15300.2, subdivision (c), was adopted, which provides: `Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.' "Cmtys.for a Better Env't v. Cal. Res. Agency (2002) 103 Cal. App. 4th 98, 127. Notably, the City's environmental determination includes no findings in support of its determination. CalBeach Advocates v. City of Solana Beach (2002) 103 Cal. App. 4th 529, 536 [Every element of an exemption must be supported by substantial evidence in the record, as analyzed under the independent standard of review.) This conclusion was facially invalid. To: City of Lake Elsinore/Planning August 12, 2021 Page 3 Re: Planning Application No. 2017-62 The Exemption requires adherence to all conditions prescribed, first and foremost amongst them that "[t]he project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations." (CEQA Guidelines § 15332(a).) Thus,not only must the City provide substantial evidence that the Project is consistent with its General Plan policies, it must squarely address whether the Project meets the definition of its General Plan designation. "Categorical exemptions are strictly construed." (Save Our Schools v. Barstow Unified School District Board of Education (2015) 240 Cal. App. 4th 128, 140.) Thus, the elements of a categorical exemption must all be taken to have meaning and hold their own legal weight. (Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce v. City of Santa Monica (2002) 101 Cal. App. 4th 786, 793 ["Exemption categories are not to be expanded or broadened beyond the reasonable scope of their statutory language.") "These rules ensure that in all but the clearest cases of categorical exemptions, a project will be subject to some level of environmental review." (Save Our Carmel River v. Monterey Peninsula Water Management District(2006) 141 Cal. App. 4th 677, 697.) Finding that the project is exempt from CEQA given it's proximity to playing children is baffling. A number of compounds injurious to human health are released from gas stations during vehicle fueling and from underground storage tank vents. These compounds include: benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene (BTEX). Measures to reliably resolve these adverse health effects are not employed at new gas stations. Benzene is the gasoline constituent most harmful to human health. Adverse health effects of benzene include nausea, cancer, anemia, increased susceptibility to infections, and low birth weight. According to the World Health Organization Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality there is no safe level for benzene. The following research documents the extent of benzene releases from gas stations as well as adverse health effects: A 1993 study published by the Canadian petroleum industry found average benzene concentrations of 146 and 461 parts per billion (ppb) at the gas station property boundary in summer and winter, respectively. A 2001 study noted median ambient benzene levels of 1.9 ppb in houses up to 328 feet from a service station. A 2003-2004 study conducted in France documented a significant relationship between childhood leukemia and living near a gas station. A 2010 study conducted in Spain documented elevated air pollution within 100 meters (328 feet) of a gas station. In 2012, Brazilian researchers found that air quality was significantly degraded up to 150 meters (492 feet) from gas stations. To: City of Lake Elsinore/Planning August 12, 2021 Page 4 Re: Planning Application No. 2017-62 In 2005, the California Air Resources Board probably became the first in the U.S. to recommend a minimum public health safety zone between new gas stations and "sensitive land uses." The recommendation appeared in Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. The pre-2005 studies referenced above, and other research prompted the Board to recommend a minimum 300-foot separation distance between new gas stations and"sensitive land uses such as residences, schools, daycare centers,playgrounds, or medical facilities."The State of California is widely recognized as having some of the most effective air pollution control requirements in the nation. Yet, even with California controls, a minimum separation is still required to protect public health. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency echoed concerns about the health risk associated with gas station emissions in their School Siting Guidelines. The USEPA recommended screening school sites for potential health risk when located within 1,000 feet of a gas station. In fact, a 2019 study of U.S. gas stations found that benzene emissions from underground gasoline storage tank vents were sufficiently high to constitute a health concern at a distance of up to 518- feet. Also, the researchers noted: "emissions were 10 times higher than estimates used in setback regulations [like that in the California handbook] used to determine how close schools, playgrounds, and parks can be situated to the facilities [gas stations]." Prior to the 2019 study it was thought that most of the benzene was released at the pump during fueling. A 2015 paper noted the following bit of irony with regard to vapor recovery and harmful emissions from gas station storage tanks: "It is important to note that vapor recovery at the nozzle can cause vapor releases at the storage tank, because vapors recovered at the nozzle are typically directed into the storage tank. The storage tank, in turn, can "breathe" and potentially release recovered vapors immediately or at a later time. A tank sucks in relatively uncontaminated air as the liquid fuel level drops in the tank due to vehicle refueling, and it releases vapors through the vent pipe into the atmosphere if the gas pressure increases and exceeds the cracking pressure of the pressure/vacuum valve, when fuel evaporates into unequilibrated gas in the headspace." The 2015 paper contained the following summary regarding the health implications of living, working or learning near a gas station: "Health effects of living near gas stations are not well understood. Adverse health impacts may be expected to be higher in metropolitan areas that are densely populated. Particularly affected are residents nearby gas stations who spend significant amounts of time at home as compared to those who leave their home for work because of the longer period of exposure. Similarly affected are individuals who spend time close to a gas station, e.g., in close by businesses or in the gas station itself. Of particular concern are children who, for example, live nearby,play nearby, or attend nearby schools,because children are more vulnerable to hydrocarbon exposure." Further, the idling engines emit a large quantity of particulates into the local atmosphere. These particulates can pose a significant health risk for those living and playing near convenience store/gas stations. To: City of Lake Elsinore/Planning August 12, 2021 Page 5 Re: Planning Application No. 2017-62 In conclusion, the City has not reviewed the significant issues relating to the placement of the Project and has entirely disregarded the EPA requirements for siting of a gas station near a school. No mitigation is proposed and the placement of the preschool on the plans for the Project are completely incorrect in their depiction of the separation. For the foregoing reasons, our Client wholly objects to the Project, and its further implementation as exempt from the requirements of CEQA. Sincerely, TYLER&BURSCH, LLP R. Todd Frahm RTF/db Cc: Client TY L E R S���H LLP�Bum�R RSISORS REPLY TO: Riverside County Office: Orange County Office: 25026 Las Brisas Road 17875 Von Karman Avenue,#150 Murrieta,California 92562 Irvine,California 92614 Telephone: (951)600-2733 Telephone: (714)978-2060 Facsimile: (951)600-4996 Facsimile: (714)922-8241 February 23, 2022 Via Electronic Mail and U.S. Mail City of Lake Elsinore Attn: Justin Kirk, Damaris Abraham, Jason Simpson and David Mann 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 j kirk&Lake-Elsinore.org dabrahamALake-Elsinore.org j simpsongLake-Elsinore.org david(d),cega.com Re: STORYBOOK PRESCHOOL/BERRI BROTHERS PROJECT PLANNING APPLICATION NO: 2017-62 Dear Mr. Kirk, Ms. Abraham, Mr. Simpson and Mr. Mann: As you are aware, this office represents Storybook Preschool (the "Preschool") in all matters relating to the proposed construction of a gas station, convenience store and car wash on the property adjoining the preschool. Please direct all correspondence to the undersigned. "CEQA is a comprehensive scheme designed to provide long-term protection to the environment." (Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game Com. (1997) 16 CalAth 105, 112.) It applies to "discretionary projects proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies."(§21080, subd. (a).) "In enacting CEQA, the Legislature declared its intention that all public agencies responsible for regulating activities affecting the environment give prime consideration to preventing environmental damage when carrying out their duties. [Citations.] CEQA is to be interpreted `to afford the fullest possible protection to the environment within the reasonable scope of the statutory language."' (Mountain Lion Foundation, at p. 112.) There are three fundamental steps in the CEQA review process. "`The first step is jurisdictional and requires a public agency to determine whether a proposed activity is a "project." . . . If a proposed activity is a project,the agency proceeds to the second step of the CEQA process. At the second step,the agency must"decide whether the project is exempt from the CEQA review process under either a statutory exemption[citation] or a categorical exemption set forth in the . . . [CEQA] Guidelines. Unlike statutory exemptions, categorical exemptions are subject to exceptions. If a project is categorically exempt and does not fall within an exception, "`it is not subject to CEQA www.iylerbursch.com tfrahm@tylerbursch.com To: City of Lake Elsinore/Planning February 23, 2022 Page 2 Re: Planning Application No. 2017-62 requirements and "may be implemented without any CEQA compliance whatsoever." (Holden v. City of San Diego (2019)43 Cal.App.5th 404, 409 (Holden).) The third step is reached if a project is not exempt or if an exemption may not be relied on due to an applicable exception. (See ibid.) Under such circumstances, the agency must decide whether the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Depending on the answer to that question, the agency then prepares a negative declaration, a mitigated negative declaration or an environmental impact report. (See § 21080, subds. (c) & (d); Citizens for Responsible & Open Government v. City of Grand Terrace (2008) 160 Cal.AppAth 1323, 1331-1332.) The City concluded the project was categorically exempt from CEQA under the infill exemption set forth in CEQA Guidelines section 15332. In order for a project to qualify for the infill exemption, five criteria must be met: "(a) [t]he project [must be] consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; (b) [t]he proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; (c) [t]he project site has no value, as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species[;] (d) [a]pproval of the project [must] not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality[; and] [¶] (e) [t]he site [must be able to] be adequately served by all required utilities and public services." (CEQA Guidelines, § 15332.) The Guidelines also establish exceptions to the exemptions. (Guidelines, § 15300.2.) "Even if a project falls within the description of one of the exempt classes, it may nonetheless have a significant effect on the environment based on factors such as location, cumulative impact, or unusual circumstances."(Save Our Carmel River v. Monterey Peninsula Water Management Dist. (2006) 141 Cal.AppAth 677, 689 (Save Our Carmel River).) Among the exceptions are the following: "(a) Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and I I are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated,precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. (b) Cumulative impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impacts of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. (c) Significant Effect.A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances."(Guidelines, § 15300.2.). As the Project is located five feet from a preschool , the Project exemption improperly claimed is strongly refuted by all three of these exceptions. The Supreme Court clarified the meaning of the language, the relative burdens and the applicable standards of review in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of Berkeley (2015) 60 CalAth 1086 (Berkeley Hillside). "As to projects that meet the requirements of a categorical exemption, a party challenging the exemption has the burden of producing evidence supporting an exception." (Id. at p. 1105.)For the unusual circumstances exception,this may be done in one of two ways. One may identify"evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment." (Ibid.) To: City of Lake Elsinore/Planning February 23, 2022 Page 3 Re: Planning Application No. 2017-62 Alternatively, one may show evidence (1) the project is unusual because it "has some feature that distinguishes it from others in the exempt class, such as its size or location"; and (2) there is "a reasonable possibility of a significant effect due to that unusual circumstance." (Ibid.) "Whether a particular project presents circumstances that are unusual for projects in an exempt class is an essentially factual inquiry, "`founded `on the application of the fact-finding tribunal's experience with the mainsprings of human conduct."" [Citation.] Accordingly, as to this question, the agency serves as `the finder of fact' [citation], and a reviewing court should apply the traditional substantial evidence standard . . . . [A]fter resolving all evidentiary conflicts in the agency's favor and indulging in all legitimate and reasonable inferences to uphold the agency's finding, [the court] must affirm [the agency's] finding if there is any substantial evidence, contradicted or uncontradicted, to support it." (Berkeley Hillside, supra, 60 CalAth at p. 1114.) "As to whether there is `a reasonable possibility' that an unusual circumstance will produce `a significant effect on the environment' [citation], a different approach is appropriate, both by the agency making the determination and by reviewing courts." (Berkeley Hillside, supra, 60 CalAth at p. 1115.) The agency applies a fair argument standard, meaning it reviews the evidence to see if there is a fair argument of a reasonable possibility the project will have a significant effect on the environment. (Ibid.) If there is substantial evidence of a reasonable possibility the project will have such an effect, the agency may not rely on the exemption even if there is evidence to the contrary. (Id. at p. 1112.) A reviewing court"`determine[s] whether substantial evidence support[s] the agency's conclusion as to whether the prescribed"fair argument"could be made."'(Berkeley Hillside,supra,60 CalAth at p. 1115.) If it ""`perceives substantial evidence""' that there is a reasonable possibility the project will have a significant environmental impact,but the agency relied on the exemption,""`the agency's action is to be set aside because the agency abused its discretion by failing to proceeding "in a manner required by law.""' (Id. at p. 1112; see Protect Telegraph Hill v. City and County of San Francisco (2017) 16 Cal.App.5th 261, 270.) "Courts may also look to conditions in the immediate vicinity of a proposed project to determine whether a circumstance is unusual. [Citation.] This includes whether the project is consistent with the surrounding zoning and land uses." (Citizens, supra, 242 Cal.AppAth at p. 586.) The project proposes to establish a new 3,000 sq. ft. convenience store with the concurrent sale of beer and wine (Type 20 ABC), a 4,400 sq. ft. canopy with 18 fueling stations, and a 5,739 sq. ft. self-serve carwash on an approximately 1.8-acre site (`Project'). The Project will provide 49 parking spaces that include 22 standard spaces, two (2) accessible spaces, and 25 vacuum spaces. On the site plan, the preschool yard shows no less than 20 feet from the Project to more than 45 feet and incorrectly places the yard in relation to the Project (see Site Plan -Exhibit "A"). This is incorrect as the yard is no more than 5 feet from the Project (see AerialNicinity Map - Exhibit "B") as shown clearly on the documents provided by the Project developer. This would place 80 to 100 preschool age children within 5 feet of three lines of idling cars, car wash dryers, exhaust To: City of Lake Elsinore/Planning February 23, 2022 Page 4 Re: Planning Application No. 2017-62 fumes, radios, and engine noise, not to mention the fumes from the gas pumps and underground tanks. This is an unacceptable risk to the health and safety of the children and staff on the yard. The major discrepancy between the Site Plan and actual location of the preschool yard as shown on the AerialNicinity Map is no accident. The developer is attempting to mislead the City and the public into the false belief that the Project will not affect the preschool. Their own documents show that the Project directly abuts the yard where preschool age children will be playing and inhaling fumes on a daily basis. Page 7 of the Imperial Stations Class 32 Categorical Exemption Checklist states: "Operation of the Project would result in an increase in ambient noise levels from the car wash,fueling activities, parking activities, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) noise equipment, and truck deliveries and Project-related traffic. However, the increases in ambient noise levels caused by operation would not exceed the City's exterior noise standards. Therefore, impacts from operational noise would be less than significant." While developer attempts to state that the "impacts from operational noise would be less than significant" the 5 foot proximity to the preschool, coupled with the napping and quiet time requirements of preschool aged children makes this laughable in its short-sightedness. Page 8 of the Imperial Stations Class 32 Categorical Exemption Checklist states: "Construction and operation of the Project would not emit pollutants in excess of localized significance thresholds established by SCAQMD. Therefore, Project would neither result in any localized significant air quality impacts from Project construction and operation nor expose nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations" that "Construction and operation of the Project would not result in significant odor impacts" and that "Moreover, the Project does not have the potential to expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people, or conflict with or obstruct implementation of any air quality plan. In conclusion, the Project would not result in any significant air quality impacts." These statements are simply false. Previously transmitted documents clearly lay out the risk to the preschool aged children from exposure to the pollutants which inevitably flow from operation of this type. The Planning Department's finding that "The proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is,therefore,categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents under the California Environmental Quality Act" despite the foregoing (readily discoverable falsehoods) is troubling and makes clear the fact that this Project does not meet the requirements for the in-fill exemption. Development and planning should be conducted in concert with a duty to identify and investigate the risks to and concerns for the existing neighborhoods. Assuming the Planning Department has a tape measure, verifying the ridiculously overstated distances of the Project from the preschool would have taken minutes if it could not be determined by looking at the documents provided by the developer. Ramrodding the Project through on a categorical exemption in an effort to pacify a developer at the expense of preschool aged children is a clear dereliction of that duty. To: City of Lake Elsinore/Planning February 23, 2022 Page 5 Re: Planning Application No. 2017-62 To add insult to injury, the Project will sell wine and beer on premises directly adjacent to the preschool and a church. California Business and Professions Code 23789 authorizes the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to deny issuance of a retail license for premises located within the immediate vicinity of churches and hospitals, and within 600 feet of schools and public playgrounds. The California State PTA encourage and urges city and county agencies to develop and implement legislation that would deny the licensing or transfer of license of any establishment which sells alcoholic beverages within 600 feet of schools. There is a reason for this ability. The existing uses of the neighboring properties should be closely reviewed prior to bringing alcohol sales into the area to protect those already in the area. That has not been done here. "[R]egulations by way of exceptions in respect to churches and schools should be liberally construed in favor of such regulations and against applicants for license to sell liquor within prescribed areas."Schaub's, Inc. v. Dept of Alcoholic Beverage Control(1957) 153 Cal. App. 2d 858, 867. The facts in this matter clearly mitigate against the use of a Categorical Exemption and toward the requirement of full CEQA compliance as well as a meaningful review by the City of all potential impacts from the proposed Project without reliance upon the developer's verifiably false information. Sincerely, TYLER&BURSCH, LLP Z7- 7,�� A. od Frahm RTF/db Cc: Client Collins & Khan LLP C< 3435 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2600 Collins`& Khan Los Angeles, CA 90010-2246 Tel: 323.549.0700 Facsimile: 323.549.0707 www.collinsandkhan.com February 28, 2022 VIA EMAIL TO: R. Todd Frahm, Esq. Tyler&Bursch, LLP 25026 Las Brisas Road Murrieta, CA 92562 tfrahmkiylerbursch.com k� irkgLake-Elsinore.org dabrahamkLake-El sinore.org kbeerykLake-El sinore.org s� impsonkLake-Elsinore.org davidkcega.com Re: Imperial Stations, Inc. Planning Application No.: 2017-62 Dear Mr. Frahm, Mr. Kirk, Ms. Abraham, Mr. Beery, Mr. Simpson and Mr. Mann: We are counsel to David Berri, of Imperial Stations, Inc., regarding the above-described Project described in the above Planning Application, write in reference to your February 23, 2022 letter addressed to you. Our client commissioned several studies that both address and support the Application and its compliance with CEQA guidelines, and the Class 32 Categorial Exemption Checklist prepared by the City of Lake Elsinore. These studies likewise have addressed matters raised in Mr. Frahm's February 23, 2022 letter. A link to the City's website with all such reports is here: http://www.Iake- elsinore.org/city-hall/community-development/planning/cega-documents-available-for-public- review/imperial-stations R. Todd Frahm,Esq. Tyler&Bursch, LLP February 28, 2022 2 1 P a g e We direct your attention to the specific pages of the reports that address issues raised by your February 23, 2022 letter: l. Traffic Impact Analysis(June 4, 2021),pp. 40-43 (Findings), specifically the finding on page 32,that the Project does not significantly impact any of the study intersections, and Section 7(D) Safety and Operations Improvements on page 43; 2. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis, pp. 28-40, and specifically Table K on page 28,which shows that the Project's operations are projected to fall well below SCAQMD thresholds; and 3. Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis, pp. 17-27, and specifically regarding the Preschool, the finding on page that the increased noise of the Project would not be detectable to the human ear. Should you wish to discuss any concerns of the Storybook Preschool that you believe remain following your reading of the findings in these reports,please feel free to give me a call. Otherwise, please confirm that your client will withdraw its opposition to the Application, as soon as possible and by not later than 5:00 p.m. on March 1, 2022. Very truly yours, COLLINS & KHAN LLP Marc A. Collins cc: David Berri,Imperial Stations,Inc. Azim Khanmohamed U U LU U Lu )--K,; U U :in u U u LU Hi -0em U—J, E3 --- - --- TA ki 5 —---—------- ---- -- - L2 A ------------ \tl Ir w. SELF SERVE 11 C Wj FRO AR gTUNNEL �� :. l(j .OIL ------ ----- - ui 1p. ..4,0 '427.90. . . . . . N7rO25XE P S 4; -4 j COWERCIAL 3) 5 -5) J f / PRESC e- MAR 0 1 2022 VA, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT PLANNING 9M DATA W-CRATM N tztT3&=ws oy ACCESSOR'4 BM BROTHERS PARCEL NUMBER 22 SHADY LANE 30-172-016 BMNE.CA 92603 7ONW: PHI(714)801-3918 CYU S4tffACL• iir:LL' 04ND BERRI PARCEL 3 OF WP 19M U) SO FF. ACRE PATIO m r ■ • p O PHASE I LOT AREA 79.041.0 1.8 - CFAFMC SCALE > 'pt, ME 'u 3,OD0.0 - 17% VICINITY MAP a OANOVA AM �a"•r iR CONSIRLcIlm CAR WASH •"�. OCCUPANCY: B 4.400.0 - 5.6[ CONSTRUCTION: V-B 2Z LANDSCAPING AREA 11.944.0 - 15.1% n_ s RIOUDTETIFNT TYPE 577E REQUIRED PROADED V C-SWT�1/250 ENNDICAP 17118' 1 2 W WAAL 2/BAY REGULAR 9'%T6' 13 22 allo U PARKING W140WR1 13kTB' 0 23 Late Elsnorr (." c i nk AREA MAL 14 47 HMd d C—ino qmE nor.Diamond d .S gP F4 a o- I COMMERCIAL / A - Alt o c r I_,J L J V ll (a> �a�(�D �� d a;b QD 101 ot 1 _ \ Z I 1 ©1MIO I Ml I g �' m m =* _ + '' ! ' 1. J ,�7 � '{ �J FU� r I 8 -- db O Q D I O I OO I O I OI j a� sELF sewE I , I `z m Z I L y_J �4f1 CAR WTUNNEL a O Q J CAM? --► _ ® co� z H O J zO w Lu r N7tU2'54'E � ¢ �C DATE Issum. �[ 08/08/17 COMMERCIAL COMMERCL4L oBnwN ar: cNEcncd W. F. COHEN F. COHEN PMELT NUMBER: 17081 ISI#9 SITE PLAN C.1.0 9CMET•20-0'