HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Reso No 2008-087
,I n
! ~ I I
I
"
,
I
11
"
I
,I
"
n
n
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-J!L.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS THAT THE PROJECT
KNOWN AS THE GREENWALD COMMERCIAL CENTER IS
CONSISTENT WITH THE MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT
CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP)
WHEREAS, Ed Sauls, of The Sauls Company, filed an application with the City of
Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Commercial Design Review No. 2008-01,
Tentative Parcel Map No. 36066, and Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-01 (the
"Project") for the design and construction of a 98,587 square foot neighborhood
shopping center in six buildings on a 13.9!: acre site with related improvements, located
on north side of Greenwald Avenue, at the northeast corner of the City of Lake Elsinore,
directly adjacent to the City of Canyon Lake and its North Gate, and known as
Assessor's Parcel No. 349-290-009, (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that all projects which are
proposed on land within an MSHCP criteria cell and which require discretionary
approval by the legislative body undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process
("LEAP") and a Joint Project Review ("JPR") between the City and the Regional
Conservation Authority ("RCA") prior to public review of the project applications; and
WHEREAS, Section 6.0 further requires that development projects within or
outside of a criteria, cell must be analyzed pursuant to the MSHCP "Plan Wide
Requirements"; and
WHEREAS, the Project is discretionary in nature and requires review and
approval by the Planning Commission and/or City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Project is within a MSHCP criteria cell of the Elsinore Area Plan,
and therefore, the Project was processed through a LEAP and JPR as well as reviewed
pursuant to the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements"; and
WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that the City adopt consistency
findings prior to approving any discretionary project entitlements for development of
property that is subject to the MSHCP; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that the
discretionary project entitlements for the Greenwald Commercial Center are consistent
with the MSHCP; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the City Council has
considered evidence presented by the Planning Commission, Community Development
Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this
item on October 28. 2008.
I
In
n
. I
n
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council has considered the proposed application and its
consistency with the MSHCP prior to making a decision to adopt findings that the
Project is consistent with the MSHCP.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the
MSHCP, the City Council makes the following findings:
1. The proposed project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the
City must make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval.
The Property is located within a MSHCP criteria cell. As such, the Project has
been processed through the LEAP and JPR, as well as reviewed for consistency
with the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements," including Section 6.1.2
Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines.
2. The proposed project is subject to the City's LEAP and the County's Joint Project
Review processes.
As stated above, the Property is located within a MSHCP criteria cell and
therefore the Project was processed through the LEAP and JPR.
3. The proposed project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal
Pools Guidelines.
A total of 0.06 acres of mule fat scrub and southern willow scrub occur on the
Property but would not be impacted by the Project. Further, neither vernal pools
nor the conditions that support vernal pools exist onsite as the majority of the
project site is Riversidean sage scrub and disturbed land. However, vernal pools
are not the only habitat in which fairy shrimp could exist. Due to the disturbance
on the project site and lack of native habitat, the project site is not expected to
support any of the MSHCP Riparian/Riverine plant or wildlife species. The
Project is therefore consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool
Guidelines set forth in Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP. No further action regarding
this section of the MSHCP is required.
4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant
Species Guidelines.
Per MSHCP requirements, the Property is not subject to the Narrow Endemic
Plant Species Guidelines set forth in Section 6.1.3. No further action regarding
this section of the MSHCP is required.
5. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and
Procedures.
i
I
in
Per MSHCP requirements, the Property is not subject to any of the Critical Area
Species Survey Area Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.3.2 of the MSHCP, with
the exception of Burrowing Owl. A focused burrowing owl survey was conducted
in accordance with the Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions of the MSHCP. No
burrowing owls or burrowing owl signs were observed on the Property or
adjacent lands. As required by the MSHCP, mitigation has been included to
conduct a Burrowing Owl survey 30 days prior to any ground-disturbance,
including the removal of vegetation or other debris. No furlher action regarding
this section of the MSHCP is required.
6. The proposed project is consistent with the UrbanNVildlands Interface
Guidelines.
n
The Property is located adjacent to MSHCP Conservation Area, and therefore
project design features and best management practices are incorporated into the
Project to address and minimize edge effects associated with run-off, night
lighting, and noise-generating land uses. As such, the Project is consistent with
Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines set forlh in Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP.
No further action regarding this section of the MSHCP is required.
7. The proposed project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
None of the resources for which the vegetation mapping requirements apply will
be impacted by the Project. No furlher action regarding this section of the
MSHCP is required.
8. The proposed project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines.
The MSHCP acknowledges that brush management to reduce fuel loads and
protect urban uses and public health/safety shall occur where development is
adjacent to conservation areas. The Properly is adjacent to open areas that may
require on-going brush abatement to reduce fire risk. One of the scenarios in the
Fuels Management Guidelines is that any new development planned adjacent to
a MSHCP conservation area or other undeveloped area shall incorporate brush
management guidelines in the development boundaries and shall not encroach
into MSHCP conservation areas. Because the Project is non-residential, has
incorporated building setbacks and appropriate fire-resistant materials in the
design, and will not encroach into MSHCP conservation areas, the Project is
consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.4 of
the MSHCP. No furlher action regarding this section of the MSHCP is required.
9. The proposed project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local
Development Mitigation Fee.
The developer will be required to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development
Mitigation Fee.
n
n
n
[I
10. The proposed project is consistent with the MSHCP.
The Project is consistent with all applicable provisions of the MSHCP. No further
actions related to the MSHCP are required.
SECTION 3. Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and the
Conditions of Approval attached to the Resolution approving Commercial Design
Review No. 2008-01, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore hereby adopts
findings that the Project is consistent with the MSHCP.
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, this twenty-eight day of October 2008.
AYES: Mayor Ditr1l')t,o.Hickman, Mayor Pro Tem Genie Kelley,
Councilmember Thomas Buckley, Councilmember Robert Magee,
Councilmember Robert Schiffner
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
D HICKMAN, MAYOR
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
:~~(}~
INTERIM CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
bjA(~
B BARA LEIBOLD
CITY ATTORNEY
n
n
n
STATEOF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
)
)ss.
)
I, CAROL COWLEY, Interim City Clerk of the City of lake Elsinore, California,
hereby certify that Resolution No. 2008-87 was adopted by the City Council
of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of
October 2008, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Mayor Daryl Hickman, Mayor ProtTem Genie Kelley,
Councilmember Thomas Buckley, Councilmember Robert Magee,
NOES: Councilmember Robert Schiffner
None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
c(l~r!4
INTERIM CITY CLERK