HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-027 PA 2018-35 Conditional Use Permit
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-27
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-07 TO
ESTABLISH A 25,105 SQUARE FOOT CANNABIS FACILITY LOCATED AT
APN: 377-120-059
Whereas, TRU CC, LLC has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore (City)
requesting approval of Planning Application No. 2018-35 (Development Agreement No. 2018-03,
Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-07, and Industrial Design Review No. 2019-03) to construct a
50,627 sq. ft. concrete tilt-up building with 97 parking spaces on an approximately 2.77-acre site.
Hardscape, landscape, on-site stormwater management improvements, trash enclosure, and
area lighting would be constructed as part of the project. In addition the applicant has requested
to establish a portion of the building (approximately 25,105 sq. ft.) as a cannabis facility that
includes cultivation, manufacturing, retail, distribution, and related uses. The proposed project is
located at the northwest corner of Central Avenue and Pasadena Street (APN: 377-120-059);
and,
Whereas, Section 6.0 of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP) requires that all discretionary projects within a MSHCP Criteria Cell
undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process (LEAP) and Joint Project Review (JPR) to analyze
the scope of the proposed development and establish a building envelope that is consistent with
the MSHCP criteria; and,
Whereas, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP further requires that the City adopt consistency
findings demonstrating that the proposed discretionary entitlement complies with the MSHCP
Criteria Cell, and the MSHCP goals and objectives; and,
Whereas, Section 17.415.070 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) provides that
certain uses are desirable but may have operational characteristics that disproportionately impact
adjoining properties, businesses, or residents. Accordingly, such uses require a more
comprehensive review and approval procedure, including the ability to condition the project in
order to mitigate significant impact; and,
Whereas, pursuant Section 17.410.070 (Approving Authority) and Section 17.410.030
(Multiple Applications) of the LEMC, the Planning Commission (Commission) has been delegated
with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council (Council) pertaining to
conditional use permits; and,
Whereas, on February 16, 2021 and March 2, 2021, at duly noticed Public Hearings, the
Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department
and other interested parties with respect to this item; and,
Whereas, pursuant to Section 17.410.070 of the LEMC, the Council has the responsibility
of making decisions to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove recommendations of the
Commission for conditional use permits; and,
Whereas, on April 13, 2021, at a duly noticed Public Hearing, the Council has considered
the recommendation of the Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community
Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item
DocuSign Envelope ID: A6529337-BAE4-405D-AEF4-5F77F9978BB0
CC Reso. No. 2021-27
Page 2 of 4
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Council has considered the Project has found it acceptable.
Section 2: That in accordance with the MSHCP, the Council makes the following findings
for MSHCP consistency:
1. The Project is not subject to the City’s LEAP and the Western Riverside County Regional
Conservation Authority’s (RCA) JPR processes as it is not located within a Criteria Cell.
2. The Project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas, Vernal Pools Guidelines, and
the Fuel Management Guidelines as the Project is located in a previously disturbed site.
Therefore Sections 6.1.2 or 6.3.1 of the MSHCP are not applicable.
3. The Project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines
and the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures because the project is not located within
any Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Areas or Critical Species Survey Areas.
4. The Project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines because the Project site
is not within or adjacent to any MSHCP Criteria Cell or conservation areas.
5. The project has been conditioned to pay any applicable MSHCP Local Development
Mitigation fees.
Section 3: The Council finds that the proposed Project is exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§21000 et seq.: “CEQA”) and the CEQA
Guidelines (14 C.C.R. §§ 15000 et seq.) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 In-Fill
Development Projects. The Project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and
policies, as well as zoning designation and regulations, and is within the City’s boundaries on a
site less than five acres surrounded by urban uses. The subject property has no value as habitat
for endangered, rare or threatened species. Approval of the Project will not result in any significant
effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality and the Project is adequately served
by all required utilities and public services.
Section 4: That in accordance with LEMC Section 17.415.070.C. Findings, the Council
makes the following findings regarding Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-07:
1. That the proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord
with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which
the site is located.
The proposed Project is located in the Limited Industrial (LI) General Plan Land use
designation and the Limited Manufacturing (M-1) Zoning designation, which is consistent
with the applicable General Plan Land Use Designation. The proposed use is a permitted
use subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit within the M-1 Zoning designation.
2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort or general
welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the
City, or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City.
DocuSign Envelope ID: A6529337-BAE4-405D-AEF4-5F77F9978BB0
CC Reso. No. 2021-27
Page 3 of 4
The proposed use does not propose either directly or indirectly any detrimental effects to
the existing surrounding community. The Project has been conditioned as such to avoid
any possible negative impacts associated with the proposed use.
3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and
for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features
required by this title.
The proposed use has been analyzed and staff has determined that the proposed use
meets all applicable sections of the LEMC and will complement the existing uses, based
on the submitted plans and attached conditions of approval.
4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as
to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the
subject use.
The proposed use is located within an existing built environment, inclusive of streets. The
existing streets are of adequate size to facilitate safe and convenient transportation to and
from the site.
5. In approving the subject use at the specific location, there will be no adverse effect on
abutting properties or the permitted and normal use thereof.
The Project has been thoroughly reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City
departments thereby eliminating the potential for any adverse effects.
6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to LEMC 17.415.070.B, including
guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the
approval of the subject Project to ensure development of the property in accordance with
the objectives of this chapter and the planning district in which the site is located.
Pursuant to Section 17.415.070.B of the LEMC, the Project was considered by the
Commission at a duly noticed Public Hearing on February 16, 2021, and subsequently by
the City Council at a noticed Public Hearing on April 13, 2021, appropriate and applicable
conditions of approval have been included to protect the public health, safety and general
welfare.
Section 5: Based upon the evidence presented, both written and testimonial, and the
above findings, the Council finds that the Project is consistent with the MSHCP.
Section 6: Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and the Conditions
of Approval imposed upon the Project, the Council hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No.
2018-07.
Section 7: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
Section 8: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and enter it into
the book of original Resolutions.
DocuSign Envelope ID: A6529337-BAE4-405D-AEF4-5F77F9978BB0
CC Reso. No. 2021-27
Page 4 of 4
Passed and Adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore,
California, this 13th day of April 2021.
Robert E. Magee
Mayor
Attest:
Candice Alvarez, MMC
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE )
I, Candice Alvarez, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 2021-27 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California,
at the Regular meeting of April 13, 2021 and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Tisdale, Johnson, and Manos; Mayor Pro Tem Sheridan; and
Mayor Magee
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Candice Alvarez, MMC
City Clerk
DocuSign Envelope ID: A6529337-BAE4-405D-AEF4-5F77F9978BB0