HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem no. 07 PSA Adams Streeter Civil EngineersCity of Lake Elsinore
LW811-Si no
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
www.lake - elsinore.org
Ne °— IKikr- ' City Council Agenda Report
File Number: TMP 19 -961
Agenda Date: 10/13/2020 Version: 1 Status: Approval Final
In Control: City Council / Successor Aqency File Type: Council Consent
Calendar
Agenda Number: 7)
Professional Services Aareement with Adams Streeter Civil Enaineers for Avenues Drainaae
Project
Authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Adams Streeter Civil
Engineers in the amount of $169,519 plus an additional 10% contingency for the Avenues Drainage
Project in final form as approved by the City Attorney.
City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 101812020
CITY OF ih41
4
LAKE LS1110 E
L �
DREAM EXTREME
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Grant Yates, City Manager
Prepared By: Remon Habib, City Engineer
Date: October 13, 2020
Subject: Professional Engineering Services to Adams Streeter Civil Engineers for
the Avenues Drainage Study and Drainage Improvement Project
Recommendation
Approve and Authorize the City Manager to execute an Agreement for Professional Engineering
Services in the amount of $169,519 to Adams Streeter Civil Engineers, plus an additional 10%
contingency, in final form as approved by City Attorney.
Background
The Agreement will authorize Adams Streeter Civil Engineers to start the Drainage Study and
Drainage Improvements Design for the Avenues.
The drainage improvements will significantly reduce the amount of flooding which regularly
occurs in the "Avenues" neighborhood during rain events.
Discussion
Adams Streeter Civil Engineers will provide engineering services necessary to evaluate and
design drainage improvements and environmental clearances for the "Avenues" Drainage Study
Area, within the "Avenues" residential neighborhood.
Specifically, the intention of the proposed improvements is to mitigate the hillside runoff onto Mill
Street and subsequently Avenue 1 through Avenue 5 and allow for 100 -year storm event run off
to be contained within the street Right -of -Way.
Fiscal Impact
Professional Engineering Services Agreement will result into a cost of $169,519 plus an
additional 10% in contingency. Funding for this project is allocated within the adopted CIP
Budget.
Page 1 of 2
Exhibits
A — Agreement
B — Proposal
C — Vicinity Map
Page 2of2
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES
Adams Streeter Civil Engineer
Professional Engineering Services
This Agreement for Professional Services (the "Agreement ") is made and entered into as
of October 13, 2020, by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ( "City ")
and Adams Streeter Civil Engineers, a Corporation ( "Consultant ").
RECITALS
A. The City has determined that it requires the following professional services:
The Avenues Drainage Area Study & Drainage Improvements Design
B. Consultant has submitted to City a proposal, dated August 27, 2020, attached
hereto as Exhibit A ( "Consultant's Proposal ") and incorporated herein, to provide professional
services to City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
C. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and
knowledge to perform the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions
described herein.
D. City desires to retain Consultant to perform the services as provided herein and
Consultant desires to provide such professional services as set forth in this Agreement.
AGREEMENT
1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services described in
Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). Consultant shall provide such services at the time, place, and
in the manner specified in Consultant's Proposal, subject to the direction of the City through its
staff that it may provide from time to time.
2. Time of Performance.
a. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this
Agreement. The time for completion of the professional services to be performed by Consultant
is an essential condition of this Agreement. Consultant shall prosecute regularly and diligently
the professional services contemplated pursuant to this Agreement according to the agreed upon
performance schedule in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A).
b. Performance Schedule. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant
to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within
the time period(s) established in the Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). When requested by
Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified may be approved in writing by the City
Manager.
@BCL @6COE6C31 Page 1
C. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution of this
Agreement and shall continue until the services and related work are completed in accordance
with the Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A).
3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance
with the fees set forth in Consultants' Proposal (Exhibit A), which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant's compensation exceed One
Hundred Sixy Nine Thousand Five Hundred Nineteen dollars ($169,519) without additional written
authorization from the City. Notwithstanding any provision of Consultant's Proposal to the
contrary, out of pocket expenses set forth in Exhibit A shall be reimbursed at cost without an
inflator or administrative charge. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a
waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment.
4. Method of Payment. Consultant shall promptly submit billings to the City
describing the services and related work performed during the preceding month to the extent that
such services and related work were performed. Consultant's bills shall be segregated by project
task, if applicable, such that the City receives a separate accounting for work done on each
individual task for which Consultant provides services. Consultant's bills shall include a brief
description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours
spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay
Consultant no later than forty -five (45) days after receipt of the monthly invoice by City staff.
5. Background Checks. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the City
reserves the right to make an independent investigation into the background of Consultant's
personnel who perform work required by this Agreement, including but not limited to their
references, character, address history, past employment, education, social security number
validation, and criminal or police records, for the purpose of confirming that such personnel are
lawfully employed, qualified to provide the subject service or pose a risk to the safety of persons
or property in and around the vicinity of where the services will be rendered or City Hall. If the City
makes a reasonable determination that any of Consultant's prospective or then current personnel
is deemed objectionable, then the City may notify Consultant of the same. Consultant shall not
use that personnel to perform work required by this Agreement, and if necessary, shall replace
him or her with a suitable worker.
6. Suspension or Termination.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend
or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten
(10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of such notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease
all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or
terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or
invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section
entitled "Method of Payment" herein.
Page 2
7. Plans, Studies, Documents.
a. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings
prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the
course of implementing this Agreement, except working notepad internal documents, shall
become the property of the City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and the City shall
have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to
Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such reports,
plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. City shall have sole
determination of the public's rights to documents under the Public Records Act, and any third -
party requests of Consultant shall be immediately referred to City, without any other actions by
Consultant.
b. Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a nonexclusive
and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights,
designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings,
estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of
expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise
recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant
under this Agreement ( "Documents & Data "). Consultant shall require that all subcontractors
agree in writing that City is granted a nonexclusive and perpetual license for any Documents &
Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that
Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no
such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design
professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited
in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within
the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk.
C. Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures,
drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other
Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance
of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the
prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance
of the services under this Agreement. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or
entity not connected with the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nothing
furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has
become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use
City's name or insignia, photographs relating to project for which Consultant's services are
rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant's services under this Agreement in any
magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without
the prior written consent of City.
8. Consultant's Books and Records.
a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices,
vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for
services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3)
years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant to
this Agreement.
Page 3
b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate
performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer
period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement.
C. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this
Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business
hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated
representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for
inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually
agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices
in this Agreement.
d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be
lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant's business, City
may, by written request by any of the above -named officers, require that custody of the records
be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to
such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant's
representatives, or Consultant's successor -in- interest.
9. Independent Contractor.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly
independent contractor pursuant to California Labor Code Section 3353. The personnel
performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under
Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, or
agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers,
employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or
in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in any manner
officers, employees, or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur
any debt, obligation, or liability whatsoever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. Notwithstanding any other federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances
and regulations to the contrary and except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service
under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any
claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not
limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution
to be paid by City for employer contribution and /or employee contributions for PERS benefits.
10. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee,
agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is
determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement
System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant shall
indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and /or employer
contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or
subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions,
which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.
11. Interests of Consultant. Consultant (including principals, associates and
professional employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or
interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered
Page 4
by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which
would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant's services
hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties
hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement.
Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act
because Consultant:
a. will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his /her
rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and
direction of the City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and
b. possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond rendition
of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2).)
12. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training
and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into
this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical
personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under
this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the
standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of
expertise.
13. Compliance with Laws.
a. Consultant shall comply with all local, state and federal laws and
regulations applicable to the services required hereunder, including any rule, regulation or bylaw
governing the conduct or performance of Consultant and /or its employees, officers, or board
members.
b. Consultant represents that it has obtained and will maintain at all times
during the term of this Agreement all professional and /or business licenses, certifications and /or
permits necessary for performing the services described in this Agreement, including a City
business license.
14. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has the licenses,
permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required
of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that
Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term
of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of
Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Lake Elsinore business
license.
15. Indemnity.
a. Indemnification for Professional Liability. To the fullest extent permitted by
law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials,
employees and agents ( "Indemnified Parties ") from and against any and all claims, losses,
liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including attorney's fees and costs, to the extent they
arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the
Consultant. Consultant's duty to defend shall consist of reimbursement of defense costs incurred
Page 5
by City in direct proportion to the Consultant's proportionate percentage of fault. Consultant's
percentage of fault shall be determined, as applicable, by a court of law, jury or arbitrator. In the
event any loss, liability or damage is incurred by way of settlement or resolution without a court,
jury or arbitrator having made a determination of the Consultant's percentage of fault, the parties
agree to mediation with a third party neutral to determine the Consultant's proportionate
percentage of fault for purposes of determining the amount of indemnity and defense cost
reimbursement owed to the City.
b. Indemnification for Other Than Professional Liability. Other than in the
performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Consultant shall
indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, and any and all of its employees, officials and agents
from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings,
administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind,
whether actual, alleged or threatened, including attorneys' fees and costs, court costs, interest,
defense costs, and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or
are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Consultant
or by any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable, including but not limited to
officers, agents, employees or sub - consultants of Consultant. Consultant shall not be liable to
third parties for any liability exempted by statute.
C. General Indemnification Provisions. Consultant agrees to obtain executed
indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in this section from each
and every sub - consultant or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of
Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. In the event Consultant fails to obtain such
indemnity obligations from others as required here, Consultant agrees to be fully responsible
according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these
requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any
rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth here is binding on the
successors, assigns or heirs of Consultant and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or
this section.
16. Insurance Requirements.
a. Insurance. Consultant, at Consultant's own cost and expense, shall
procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, unless modified by the City's Risk Manager,
the following insurance policies.
i. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain
Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his /her
employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant
shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance
and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California
for all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or non - renewal of all
Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days prior
to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its
officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by
Consultant for City. In the event that Consultant is exempt from Worker's Compensation
Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his /her employees in accordance with
the laws of the State of California, Consultant shall submit to the City a Certificate of
Exemption from Workers Compensation Insurance in a form approved by the City
Attorney.
Page 6
ii. General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial
general liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per
occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If a commercial general
liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the
general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this
Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence
limit. Required commercial general liability coverage shall be at least as broad as
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form CG 0001 (ed.
11/88) or Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (ed. 1/73) covering
comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404
covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability. No endorsement may be attached
limiting the coverage.
iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain
automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities
of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this
Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non -owned vehicles, in an amount
of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence.
Automobile liability coverage must be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office
Automobile Liability form CA 0001 (ed. 12/90) Code 1 ( "any auto "). No endorsement may
be attached limiting the coverage.
iv. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain
professional errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate for Consultant's
profession for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which
may arise from Consultant's services under this Agreement, whether such services are
provided by the Consultant or by its employees, subcontractors, or sub consultants. The
amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a
claims -made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single limit per occurrence basis.
b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance
policy shall be with insurers possessing a Best's rating of no less than A:VII and shall be
endorsed with the following specific language:
i. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in any required
insurance policies or any subsequent endorsements attached thereto, the protection
offered by all policies, except for Workers' Compensation, shall bear an endorsement
whereby it is provided that, the City and its officers, employees, servants, volunteers and
agents and independent contractors, including without limitation, the City Manager and
City Attorney, are named as additional insureds. Additional insureds shall be entitled to
the full benefit of all insurance policies in the same manner and to the same extent as any
other insureds and there shall be no limitation to the benefits conferred upon them other
than policy limits to coverages.
Page 7
ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the
City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers.
Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self- insured retention the City may
have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it.
iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as
though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of
liability of the insuring company.
iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its
elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents.
V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall
not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials,
employees, agents or volunteers.
vi. The insurance provided by this Policy shall not be suspended,
voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written
notice has been received by the City.
C. Deductibles and Self- Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Consultant shall
demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self- insured retentions.
d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance
with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein.
Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of
performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the
City at all times during the term of this Agreement.
17. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing
and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed
to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within
48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.
If to City: City of Lake Elsinore
Attn: City Manager
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
With a copy to: City of Lake Elsinore
Attn: City Clerk
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
If to Consultant: Adams Streeter Civil Engineers
Attn: Randal Streeter, President
16755 Von Karman, Ste 150
Irvine, CA 92606
Page 8
18. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial
inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and
competence of Consultant and the subcontractors listed in Exhibit B. Consultant shall be fully
responsible to City for all acts or omissions of any subcontractors. Assignments of any or all
rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the
express consent of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be
performed under this Agreement except as provided in Exhibit B without the written authorization
of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for
all acts or omissions of those subcontractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any
contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on
the part of the City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor
other than as otherwise is required by law.
19. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a
continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this
Agreement.
20. Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement
commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing
party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert
witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees.
21. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes
arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall
mutually agree upon the mediator and share the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are
unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS or its successor in
interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party
shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS and thereafter the
mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation,
either party may commence litigation.
22. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed
nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for
Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid
nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely
for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration
contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation
of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term
of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service
with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated
material benefit arising therefrom.
23. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal
opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or
applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex
or age. Such non - discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial
employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or
termination.
Page 9
24. Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor
Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8,
Section 16000, et seq., ( "Prevailing Wage Laws "), which require the payment of prevailing wage
rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects.
Consultant agrees to fully comply with all applicable federal and state labor laws (including,
without limitation, if applicable, the Prevailing Wage Laws). It is agreed by the parties that, in
connection with the Work or Services provided pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant shall bear
all risks of payment or non - payment of prevailing wages under California law, and Consultant
hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the City, and its officials, officers, employees,
agents, and volunteers, free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or
alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. The foregoing indemnity shall survive
termination of this Agreement.
25. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal,
or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this
Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
26. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be
governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement
shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Riverside.
27. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to
conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants
that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to
make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. The City Manager is authorized to enter
into an amendment or otherwise take action on behalf of the City to make the following
modifications to the Agreement: (a) a name change; (b) grant extensions of time; (c) non -
monetary changes in the scope of services; and /or (d) suspend or terminate the Agreement.
28. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of
which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties
when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this
Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.
29. Entire Agreement; Incorporation; Conflict. This Agreement contains the entire
understanding between the parties relating to the obligations described herein. All prior or
contemporaneous understandings, agreements, representations and statements, oral or written,
are superseded in total by this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Consultant's
Proposal is incorporated only for the description of the scope of services and /or the schedule of
performance and no other terms and conditions from such proposal shall apply to this Agreement
unless specifically agreed to in writing. In the event of conflict, this Agreement shall take
precedence over those contained in the Consultant's Proposal.
30. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written
document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
[Signatures on next page]
Page 10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the
date first written above.
"CITY"
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal
corporation
Grant Yates, City Manager
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Risk Manager
Attachments: Exhibit A — Consultant's Proposal
Exhibit B — List of Subcontractors
"CONSULTANT"
Adams Streeter Civil Engineers, a
Corporation
By: Randal Streeter
Its: President/Principal In-Charge
Page 11
.■
CONSULTANT'S PROPOSAL
[ATTACHED]
EXHIBIT A
.■
LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS
[ATTACHED]
ti
. t
a �lllll�.Y!1 ■ill;
' 74
�+
Jkr t4 • . w�
kjdr a c
ti
}
Al"
wet; - 46,..
i
M�
T
ti
. t
a �lllll�.Y!1 ■ill;
' 74
�+
Jkr t4 • . w�
kjdr a c
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
A. Cover Letter .................................................................... ............................... 2 - 3
B. Statement of Qualifications
1. Firm Information and Qualifications ........................ ..............................4-6
2. Subconsultant Firms .................................................... ............................... 7
3. Key Team Personnel Qualifications ....................... ............................... 8-9
4. Organizational Chart ................................................. ............................... 10
5. Sample Projects and References ......................... ............................... 10-16
C. Project Understanding and Approach ............................ .............................17-28
D. Scope of Work Program .............................................. ............................... 29-39
E. Project Schedule ......................................................... ............................... 40-41
F. Non - Collusion Affidavit Form (RFP Attachment 3) ............. ............................... 42
G. Form of Agreement ............................................................ ............................... 43
APPENDIX
Key Personnel Resumes .............................................. ............................... 45-51
AccessorsMaps .......................................................... ............................... 52-57
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 1
A. COVER LETTER
August 27, 2020
Carlos Norvani, Land Development Engineer
City of Lake Elsinore
130 S. Main Street
Lake Elsinore, California 92530
AS
ADAMS STREETER
LiviL Engineers
SUBJECT: Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for Project No. Z10000
Dear Mr. Norvani,
Adams Streeter Civil Engineers (ASCE) appreciates the opportunity to submit a Proposal to the City of Lake
Elsinore in response to the Request for Proposals (RFP) to provide Professional Engineering Services for "The
Avenues" Drainage Area Study and Drainage Improvements Design. ASCE is a full- service civil engineering and
surveying firm based in Irvine, California that specializes in project delivery for public agencies, special districts
and private developers. We have successfully delivered projects for our clients over the past 39 years, and have
the expertise and resources to assist the City in providing the services in a timely, efficient and cost - effective
manner. ASCE have also included NMG Geotechnical and ECORP Consulting, our team sub - consultants that will
be responsible for performing the geotechnical and CEQA environmental scope of work for the project.
ASCE's point of contact during the proposal evaluation period is as follows:
• Khoon Tan, P.E., QSD, Director of Municipal Services (Primary Contact)
Office: (949) 474 -2330 x231, Cell: (949) 390 -0984, E -mail: ktan @adams- streeter.com
• Mohammad Abadi, P.E., Senior Project Manager (Secondary Contact)
Office: (949) 474 -2330 x209, E -mail: mabadi @ adams- streeter.com
Mr. Tan will serve as the direct liaison to the City and will provide the overall project management for this
endeavor. Both Mr. Tan and Mr. Abadi will be responsible for overseeing engineering design for the project.
With a combined experience of over sixty -seven years in the engineering and construction industry including
for Mr. Tan's decade long public agency background in administrating and managing Capital Projects and Mr.
Abadi's extensive expertise in drainage design, ASCE is confident in our ability to deliver exceptional work
products and services to the City of Lake Elsinore.
ASCE acknowledge the receipt of Q & A postings on 8/19/2020 and 8/24/2020 for the RFP. A completed Non -
Collusion Affidavit Form (RFP Attachment 3) is provided in Section "F" of this Proposal. ASCE also concurs with
the terms of the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with certain exceptions to the indemnification clauses
as provided in Section "G" of this Proposal. Modifications to the clauses shown are provided as suggestions for
the City's consideration as we understand that the City does not ordinarily allow modifications to the standard
agreement when contracting for services from outside firms.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 2
This Proposal shall remain valid for a period of not less than 120 calendar days from the date and time of
submittal. The signer of this Proposal has the full authority to bind Adams - Streeter and attest that all
information submitted with this Proposal is true and correct.
Thank you for this opportunity to be of service to the City of Lake Elsinore. Please don't hesitate to contact Mr.
Tan for any questions about any portion of this Proposal during the evaluation period.
Sincerely,
Randal L. Streeter
President / Principal In- Charge
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 3
B. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
1. Firm Information and Qualifications
AREAS OF EXPERTISE
CIVIL ENGINEERING &
LAND SURVEYING
SELECT AWARDS
HomeAid Orange County & OC
United — Recognition of
Contribution to the OC United
THRIVE Quad Development 2019
Family Assistance Ministries &
HomeAid Orange County —
Recognition of Contribution to
the Calle Canasta House, 2016
American Society of Civil
Engineers, Orange County
Branch — Land Development
Project of the Year Award for
Lambert Ranch, 2013
American Public Works
Association, Southern California
Chapter — 2016 Storm Water
Quality Project of the Year for
the Glassell Campus LID Retrofit
& Parking Rehabilitation Project
American Society of Civil
Engineers, Orange County
Branch — 2017 Outstanding
Sustainable Engineering Project,
2017.
American Society of Civil
Engineers, Region 9 (CA) — 2010
Outstanding Community
Improvement Project for the
Irvine Ranch Outdoor Education
Center
Orange County Engineering
Council — 2010 Engineering
Project Achievement Award for
the Irvine Ranch Outdoor
Education Center
FIRM QUALIFICATIONS
ADAMS STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS is a premier civil engineering and
surveying firm that specializes in project delivery for local and regional public
agencies, special districts and private developers. We are a client- centered,
service - oriented small business dedicated to providing exceptional services
through thoroughness, rapid turnaround, cost efficiency and quality work.
FIRM BACKGROUND
Adams Streeter is founded
by Jan Adams and Randal
Streeter in 1981, and is
headquartered in Irvine,
California. The firm is a
small business enterprise
with over 38 years of
experience and specializes
in private and public -
realm design through
innovative and cost -
effective design solutions
for dozens of public
municipalities and private
entities throughout
California. The firm is
currently staffed by
twenty -three employees,
comprising of fourteen
civil engineers and
technicians, six surveyors
and mappers, and three
administrative staff.
EXPERIENCE
Parks, Open Space & Trails
Street Beautification,
Improvement, Rehabilitation
Public Facility Improvements
and Renovations
Office and Retail Facilities
Single and Multi - Family
Residential Developments
Urban In -Fill /Mixed -Use
Developments
Affordable Housing
Campus Housing Planning
and Design
Commercial and Industrial
Site Development
Retail Site Development
Public and Commercial ADA
Upgrades
CAPABILITIES
Streetscape and Parking Lots
Parks & Open Space
Low Impact Development,
Stormwater Management
and Water Quality
Hydrology and Hydraulics
Site Development, Planning
and Due Diligence
Site Grading & Earthwork
Site ADA Evaluations
Storm Drainage and Sanitary
Sewer
Domestic and Reclaimed
Water
Plan Check / Plan Review
Boundary Surveys, Land Title
Surveys, Topographic Survey,
Construction Staking, As -built
Surveys and Mapping Services
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 4
Adams Streeter Civil Engineers (ASCE) is a full- service civil engineering and land surveying firm that specializes
in project delivery for local and regional public agencies, special districts and private developers, and have been
providing civil engineering and surveying services in Southern California since 1981 to both our public and
private sector clients. ASCE is a California "C" corporation that was incorporated in January 8, 1981 by Jan
Adams and Randal Streeter, and is a small business enterprise (SBE) based in Irvine, California. Over the last 39
years of business, the company has earned a reputation for thoroughness, rapid turnaround, cost efficiency and
overall quality of work and is one of Orange County's premier firms for civil engineering and surveying services.
ASCE takes pride in the fact that ninety percent of our business comes from repeat clientele due in part to our
quality of work, competitive prices and our ability to meet deadlines.
ASCE have extensive experience and a proven track record in providing Public Works related services
encompassing the civil engineering, surveying and mapping fields to various cities, municipalities and districts
including, but not limited to the following:
City of Aliso Viejo
F I R M I N F O R M A T I O N
Company Legal Name:
Adams Streeter Civil Engineers, Inc.
City of Orange
16755 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 150
City of Buena Park
Irvine, CA 92606
Organizational Structure:
California "C" Corporation
State Entity Number:
C1014113
Certification
Small Business Enterprise (Certification No. 59891)
Years in Business:
39 Years
Company Officers:
Jan A. Adams (Chief Executive Officer)
City of Hermosa Beach
Randal L. Streeter (Secretary)
Orange County Water District
Linda I. Adams (Chief Financial Officer)
Adams Streeter Civil Engineers (ASCE) is a full- service civil engineering and land surveying firm that specializes
in project delivery for local and regional public agencies, special districts and private developers, and have been
providing civil engineering and surveying services in Southern California since 1981 to both our public and
private sector clients. ASCE is a California "C" corporation that was incorporated in January 8, 1981 by Jan
Adams and Randal Streeter, and is a small business enterprise (SBE) based in Irvine, California. Over the last 39
years of business, the company has earned a reputation for thoroughness, rapid turnaround, cost efficiency and
overall quality of work and is one of Orange County's premier firms for civil engineering and surveying services.
ASCE takes pride in the fact that ninety percent of our business comes from repeat clientele due in part to our
quality of work, competitive prices and our ability to meet deadlines.
ASCE have extensive experience and a proven track record in providing Public Works related services
encompassing the civil engineering, surveying and mapping fields to various cities, municipalities and districts
including, but not limited to the following:
City of Aliso Viejo
City of Newport Beach
Chino Basin Desalter Authority
City of Anaheim
City of Orange
Eastern Municipal Water District
City of Buena Park
Coast College
Irvine Ranch Water District
City of Diamond Bar
Concordia University
Irvine Campus Housing Authority
City of Fullerton
City of Perris
Jurupa Community Services Dist.
City of Garden Grove
City of Redlands
Long Beach City College
City of Hermosa Beach
City of Riverside
Orange County Water District
City of Huntington Beach
City of San Clemente
Santa Margarita Water District
City of Irvine
City of San Juan Capistrano
Riverside County Flood Control District
City of La Habra
City of Laguna Niguel
City of Lake Elsinore
City of Loma Linda
City of Mission Viejo
City of Moreno Valley
City of Tustin
City of Villa Park
City of Yorba Linda
CALTRANS
County of Orange
County of Riverside
Trabuco Canyon Water District
University of California, Bakersfield
University of California, Irvine
Vanguard University
ASCE have also provided services on numerous development and facility improvement -based projects
(residential, commercial, industrial) to our private clientele that involves extensive public infrastructure
improvements including, but not limited to the following:
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 5
Amgen
Irvine Unified School Dist.
Sukut Construction
Armada, LLC
John Laing Homes
SunCal Companies
Arnel Development
Joseph Nicholas Homes
Sunrise Communities
Artisan Communities
K. Hovnanian Companies
Taylor Morrison Homes
Barratt American
Kaufman & Broad
The Garrett Group
Baywood Development
Keystone Pacific
The Irvine Company
Boeing Realty Corporation
Koll Company
The Olson Company
Brookfield Homes
Lambert Ranch
Valeo Companies
CalAtlantic Homes
Lennar Communities
Warmington Homes
California Pacific Homes
Mastercraft Homes
William Lyon Homes
Centex Homes
MBK Homes
Catalina Freight Line
Citation Homes
Oak Tree Industries
Schafer Logistics
Cook Hill Properties
O Hill Partners
Travis Companies, Inc.
D. R. Horton Homes
Pacific Communities
Urban Commons
Fieldstone Development
Pardee Construction
Ferrado
Griffin Communities
Pulte Homes
Shlemmer Algaze Assoc
Habitat for Humanity
Rancho Mission Viejo Co
TD Architects, Inc.
Irvine Apt. Communities
Red Mountain Retail Group
Trico Realty
Irvine Community Dev.
Richmond American Homes
Ware Malcomb Architect
California Building &
Grand Valley Healthcare Skilled
The Irvine Ranch Outdoor Education
Maintenance Industries, Inc.
Nursing Facility
Center
Coast to Coast Commercial, LLC
Newport Partners, LLC
Santa Margarita Ford
Our "in- house" survey department also provide survey and mapping related services in support of engineering
projects undertaken by ASCE's engineering department, inclusive of Capital Projects for public agencies. Land
surveying and mapping related services typically performed by ASCE is as follows:
Aerial Mapping & Aerial Control Surveys
ALTA /ACSM Surveys
Boundary and Property Surveys
Condominium Mapping
Construction As -Built Surveys
Construction Staking
Control Surveys
Digital Terrain Modelling
Entitlements
Environmental Surveys
FEMA Elevation Certificates
GPS /GIS Surveys
Monitoring Well Surveys
Monumentation
Parcel, Tract and Final Maps
Legal Descriptions for Easements and R/W
Quantity Surveys and Earthwork
Record of Surveys
Records and Title Research
Right -of -Way Surveys, Mapping and Exhibits
Subdivision Planning and Mapping
Subdivision Plan Checking
Topographic Surveys and Design Surveys
Utility Research & Utility As- Builts
ASCE brings over 39 years of experience working concurrently with public agencies and private entities on
projects ranging from site planning and due diligence to infrastructure design and facility improvements, and is
very familiar with the scope of work as provided in the Request for Proposal (RFP). ASCE is well qualified and
capable to perform the required work and is confident in our ability to provide exceptional services to the City
of Lake Elsinore in a timely and cost - effective manner.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 6
2. Subconsultant Firms
ASCE have included NMG Geotechnical and ECORP Consulting, our team subconsultants that will be
responsible for performing the geotechnical and CEQA environmental scope of work for the project. An
overview of our team subconsultant firms are provided below as reference.
NMG Geotechnical, Inc. (NMG) — NMG was established in 1994 and provides a broad range
of professional services in the disciplines of geotechnical engineering, engineering geology, soils,
and materials testing for projects encompassing public works, institutional, to large acreage
master planned communities. NMG is based in Irvine where its soil and concrete testing laboratories are
located, and primarily serves the southern California region, from San Diego to Santa Clarita, and into the
Inland Empire. NMG currently employs over 50 people, including eight geotechnical engineers, eight
engineering geologists, and more than 20 field /laboratory technicians and materials inspectors. NMG has
performed numerous geotechnical investigations and design studies for pavement rehabilitation projects.
Typical geotechnical services for pavement evaluation and design include site reconnaissance and mapping,
drilling and coring, remedial earthwork and subgrade evaluation, R -value testing, and structural pavement
section recommendations. Services during construction include geotechnical observation and testing of
compacted fill, subgrade, aggregate base and asphalt pavement. NMG also provides materials testing
services and batch plant inspections. A sampling of public clients includes various municipalities /agencies
(Costa Mesa, Tustin, Irvine, Garden Grove, Anaheim, Fountain Valley, San Clemente, Aliso Viejo, Newport
Beach, OCTA, Caltrans), water districts (Irvine Ranch, Orange County, Santa Margarita, Metropolitan, Mesa
Consolidated) and school districts (Capistrano Unified, Tustin Unified). Address: 17991 Fitch, Irvine, CA
92614 (949) 442 -2442
ECORP Consulting, Inc. ( ECORP) — ECORP is a California corporation founded in 1987 with
over a 100 experienced staff members that specializes in assisting government agencies and
private clients with a wide range of environmental services including technical expertise in land use
planning; biological, cultural, and water resources; and regulatory compliance with California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Clean Water Act, federal
and state Endangered Species Acts, NHPA, and other laws and regulations. ECORP have well - established
working relationships with the resources agencies, including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). ECORP is registered with the Department of Industrial Relations
(DIR): #1000012875 (exp. 6/30/19). ECORP's current clients include the City of Anaheim, City of Costa Mesa,
City of Lake Forest and Orange County Public Works. Address: 1801 Park Court Place, B -103, Santa Ana, CA
90701 (714) 648 -0630
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 7
3. Key Team Personnel Qualifications
Key personnel for the project are assigned based upon their experience, project management abilities,
technical expertise and design competency, prior involvement with projects of similar scope, and prior
experience with the public sector. Brief overview of the key team personnel assigned to perform the scope
of work is provided below for quick reference. Full page resumes of all key personnel are also provided in
the Appendix.
PERSONNEL
• CERTIFICATIONS
Randy Streeter, PE
43 Years
• President and Principal -in- Charge w/ extensive experience in
Principal -In- Charge
(Civil and Survey)
civil engineering and surveying, and licensed to practice both
disciplines in the State of California and Arizona.
• Directed numerous City & County engineering and survey
projects involving road and utility improvements, public
t
parks, public buildings and low- income housing.
• BS in Civil Engineering Degree, California State University,
Long Beach, California (1971); Registered Civil Engineer (CA
RCE 25083 and AZ RCE No. 25846).
39 Years w /ASCE
• PE License Expiration Date: December 31, 2021
Khoon Tan, PE, QSD
32 Years
• Experienced project manager with broad knowledge and
Project Director and
(Civil)
hands -on experience in engineering design and construction.
Sr. Project Manager
• Private and public- sector practice including ten years of
��
public agency experience in managing capital improvement
projects and construction.
• CIP projects managed is inclusive of, but not limited to local,
'
arterial street and state highway improvements, pavement
rehabilitation, parks and open space development, storm
drainage, sanitary sewer, domestic and reclaimed water
infrastructure improvements, project grant funding and
management.
• BS in Civil Engineering, Oklahoma State University,
Oklahoma; Registered Civil Engineer (CA RCE 60131);
Qualified SWPPP Developer / Practitioner (No. 20862).
10 Years w /ASCE
• PE License Expiration Date: June 30, 2022
Mohammad Abadi, PE
35 Years
• Experienced project and technical engineering manager.
Sr. Project Manager
(Civil)
. Possesses extensive background and hands -on knowledge in
engineering design and construction with expertise in
��
drainage design.
C
• Extensive technical expertise in Infrastructure Planning,
Development and Design encompassing site layout, grading,
i
roadway improvements, storm drainage, sewer and water
facilities, Hydrology and Hydraulics, and water quality.
• BS in Civil Engineering, University of California, Irvine,
32 Years w /ASCE
California; Registered Civil Engineer (CA RCE 42615).
• PE License Expiration Date: March 31, 2022
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 I ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 8
PERSONNEL •
Craig Burney, PLS
31 Years
• Experienced survey manager and field surveyor.
Survey Director
(Survey)
• Oversees daily survey crew operations.
• Extensive experience in performing ALTA, boundary, aerial,
topographic, GPS, and construction surveys.
• BA in Psychology, CSU, Long Beach, California; Licensed Land
Surveyor (PLS 7732); GPS Certificate Program, UC Riverside.
• PLS License Expiration Date: December 31, 2021
30 Years w /ASCE
Ana Martinez
37 Years
• Experienced mapping professional serving the regions of
Mapping Director
(Mapping)
Orange, Los Angeles, San Bernardino and Riverside
AS_
Counties.
Extensive in Boundary Analysis, Title Report Due-
• experience
Diligence, Record of Surveys, ALTA Surveys, Final Parcel
Maps, Tract Maps, Lot Line Adjustments, Easement Rights &
Exhibits and Legal Descriptions.
'
• Rancho Santiago College, County of Orange, California
15 Years w /ASCE
Karlos Markouizos, PE
32 Years
• Experienced in field exploration and monitoring, field and
Principal Engineer/
(Geotechnical)
laboratory soil testing, grading and earthwork, slope
Project Manager
stability analysis, design of shallow and deep foundations,
shoring and retaining structures, settlement analysis,
seismic hazard analysis, structural pavement design, and
construction of underground utilities.
k wry
• BS in Civil Engineering, CSU, Long Beach, California;
Graduate Study in Civil Engineering, Carnegie - Mellon
P",
University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
• Registered Civil Engineer (CA RCE 50312).
Tom Holm, AICP
37 Years
• Diverse planning and environmental experience involving
CEQA /NEPA QA /QC
(Environmental)
environmental, natural resource, and regulatory compliance.
Manager
• Provides updates on CEQA and Planning Law to local APA and
AEP chapters.
• Former Planning and Transportation Commissioner for City of
e
Mission Viejo and Board Member of the Orange County
Natural History Foundation.
• Masters of Arts in Urban & Regional Planning,
Environmental Policy & Management emphasis, UCLA;
i
Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, UC Irvine; American
Institute of Certified Planners (AICP).
Note: Single -page resumes of the above key personnel are provided to the Appendix section of this Proposal.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 9
4. Organizational Chart
A project team organizational chart identifying communication and reporting relationships, and key
personnel that will perform the work for the project is provided as follows:
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
Carlos Norvani, Land Development Engineer
Engineering Department
Randy Streeter, PE
President / Principal —in- Charge
ADAMS STREETER CIVIL Khoon Tan, PE, QSD /P
4 CIVIL ENGINEERS ENGINEERING Project Director/ Sr. Project Manager
Mohammad Abadi, PE
Sr. Project Manager
SURVEY AND I
MAPPING
I INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM
ENVIRONMIINTAL
SCIENCE
ECORP
CONSULTING
Tom Holm, AICP
CEQAINEPA & QA /QC
Manager
Craig Burney, PL5
Survey Director
Ana Martinez
Mapping Director
GEOTECIINICAL
ENGINEERING
NMG
rrrrrii�rirr GEO TECHNICAL
Karlos Markouizos, PE
Principal Engineer /Project
Manager
ASCE is committed to maintaining the selected personnel for the duration of the project with the City of
Lake Elsinore. In the event that substitution or addition in key personnel and /or subconsultant is necessary
due to circumstances that are outside of our control, a written request will be made to the City for the
proposed change(s) for consideration and approval.
S. Sample Projects and References
ASCE have been administrating civil engineering projects to numerous cities, counties, water districts, local
public agencies and developers within the Southern California region since 1981, most of which involve
various aspects of drainage analysis and design. Samples of recent projects for ASCE and our team sub -
consultants, including for reference contact information is provided as follows:
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 10
GLASSELL CAMPUS LID RETROFIT (DEMONSTRATION CAMPUS) AS LJ
Location - Orange, California I Client — Orange County Public Works
- -11
Adams Streeter lead this multi- benefit project in conjunction
with the landscape architect (Schmidt Design Group),
geotechnical engineer (NMG Geotechnical) and other third -
party vendors for the development of schematic designs and
concept plan drawings, and for the preparation of final
construction documents for this 9.4 -acre Low- Impact
Development (LID) retrofit of the County's Glassell Campus
Facility which consists of three parcels located on Glassell
Street and Bristol Lane in the City of Orange. The team also
provided construction support services for the project.
The Glassell Campus LID Retrofit project is funded through a Proposition 84 grant
and showcase the transformation of an existing 9.4 -acre industrial /commercial site
with 95% impervious area into a state of the art MS4 compliant storm -water capture,
treatment, outreach and research center. The project restored the pre - development
hydrologic conditions by constructing various LID BMPs such as porous asphalt,
porous concrete, porous pavers, bio- remediation swales and planters, media filter,
modular wetlands, above - ground cistern and subterranean water storage structures.
The project also required extensive re- construction of the existing parking lots and
the County's paved maintenance yard facility.
This site now serves as an educational venue for the public, informing visitors of the
function and purpose of each BMP while providing relief from urbanism to the
residing tenants. The project was completed on -time and on- budget and received
the 2016 APWA Regional Storm Water Quality Project of the Year and 2017 ASCE
Outstanding Sustainable Engineering Project awards.
PRIME FIRM: Adams Streeter Civil Engineers
AWARDS: APWA Regional Storm Water Quality Project of the Year, 2016
ASCE Outstanding Sustainable Engineering Project Award, 2017
COMPLETED: 2016
CLIENT REFERENCE:
Orange County Public Works
Robert McLean, Senior Civil Engineer
OC Infrastructure Programs, Hydrology Section
(714) 647 -3951
robert.mclean @ocpw.ocgov.com
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM
X
y
Page 11
BALL ROAD BASIN SITE DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS AS
Location - Anaheim, California I Client — Orange County Water District
E� �
Adams Streeter assisted the Orange County Water District (OCWD) in
performing a site development analysis as part of the feasibility and
planning study to assess development of its Ball Road Recharge Basin
located south of Ball Road in the City of Anaheim for commercial /industrial
use. A mapping and boundary analysis of this 29 -acre site consisting of
multiple parcels was initially performed to re- establish both property
boundary and easement constraints over the property. Conceptual Site
Grading and earthwork to allow mass grading and pads establishment was
developed in consideration of constraints imposed by adjacent streets
(Ball Road, Phoenix Club Drive and the Santa Ana River service road),
drainage patterns, dry and wet utilities infrastructure, proposed facilities
(injection wells, etc.), significant easements and other factors. Off -site and
on -site hydrology, drainage analysis and water quality assessments were
also performed in consideration of the City of Anaheim's 42" Sanderson
Avenue and 36" Auto Center Drive storm drain systems and the Orange
County Flood Control District's (OCFCD) Chantilly Regional Storm Drain
System (12' x 9.S' RCB) that discharges in to the recharge basin. This effort
resulted in the development of a Conceptual Storm Drain Plan that provide
options for the extension, re- routing and discharging of the various City
and regional storm drain facilities (including for the local storm drain
collection system) to the Santa Ana River and /or proposed water quality
basin. A Conceptual Sewer and Water Plan was also developed to indicate
required improvements within Phoenix Club Drive for connection into the City of Anaheim's public sewer system.
Preliminary cost estimates to develop the site was prepared in accordance with the various concept plan improvements.
PRIME FIRM: Adams Streeter
COMPLETED: 2017 / On -Going On -Call Engineering Services
CLIENT REFERENCE:
Orange County Water District
Bruce Dosier, Director of Information Services & Property Management
714 - 378 -3298
bdosier @ocwd.com
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 12
INTERSTATE 5 / STATE ROUTE 74 HIGHWAY INTERCHANGE
STORM DRAIN AND WATER QUALITY TREATMENT PROJECT
Location — San Juan Capistrano, California I Client — City of San Juan Capistrano
Adams Streeter assisted the City of San Juan Capistrano in
providing the design for this water quality driven project involving
storm drain and water quality enhancements / structural BMP
retrofits at a busy downtown commercial district along Del Obispo
Street immediately south of Ortega Highway for the treatment of
storm water run -off into City streets originating from the
construction of the 1 -5 / SR -74 Ortega Highway Interchange
Project that was administered and recently completed by
Caltrans. This project was initiated through a Cooperative Agreement between Caltrans and the City of San Juan
Capistrano. Design was completed on -time and on a minimum budget.
AS
PRIME FIRM: Adams Streeter Civil Engineers
COMPLETED: Design Completed 2017, Construction Completed 2019
CLIENT REFERENCE: City of San Juan Capistrano
George Alvarez, PE, TE, Project Manager (former City Engineer)
(949) 443 -6351, galvarez @sanivancapistrano.org
SCE VENTURA STORAGE EXPANSION AS
Location — Ventura, California I Client — Ware Malcomb for Southern California Edison
The project consists of 1.62 acres of vacant dirt lot that was converted to an SCE
storage expansion lot at their Ventura facility. Low Impact Development techniques
were employed for the project to mitigate the additional storm water run -off
generated by the increased impervious surface area of the paved lot. Post -
construction run -off conditions was designed to mimic the pre- construction sheet
flow that drains to the adjacent orchard. The difference in the run -off was detained
and infiltrated on -site and a weir structure with rip -rap was designed to mimic the
pre- construction condition. On -site run -off is captured via a series of inlets and
conveyed to a dual corrugated metal pipe system with a CDS pre- treatment structure
for storage and treatment respectively. Infiltration of the detained storm water quality
design volume (SWQDv) is provided through four (4) modified MaxWell IV dry wells
that penetrates into permeable soil at thirty (30) feet below grade.
PRIME FIRM: Adams Streeter for Ware Malcomb
COMPLETED: 2017
CLIENT REFERENCE: Southern California Edison
Daniel Slider, Manager
(805) 654 -7238, Daniel.Slider @sce.com
Ware Malcom Project Manager: Felix Gonzalez, PE
(949) 430 -2531, FGonzalez @adams - streeter.com
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 13
ICHA UNIVERSITY HILLS AS
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
Location — Irvine, California I Client — Irvine Campus Housing Authority
The ICHA University Hills Storm Drain Improvement Project is part of a 28 -acre
Planning Area 11 development for the Irvine Campus Housing Authority (ICHA)
that involved mass excavation operations and includes the installation of water
quality BMPs consisting of a 51,000 cubic -feet storm drain retention and
infiltration system with upstream storm filtration units for pre- treatment
purposes. The scope of work for corresponding off -site improvements within the
public right -of -way also includes the reconfiguration of a 30" public storm -drain
by -pass system to intercept and redirect off -site storm run -on. The 1,600 feet
linear storm drain system with a 58 -cfs capacity was reviewed and approved by
both City of Irvine and Orange County Flood Control District and was completed
in 2016.
PRIME FIRM: Adams Streeter
COMPLETED: January 2016
CLIENT: Irvine Housing Campus Authority
Victor Van Zandt, President of Planning and Construction
949 - 824 -4827, victor.vanzandt @icha.uci.edu
ALSTON DEVELOPMENT AS
Location — Anaheim, California I Client — Tri Pointe Homes
The Alston Development Project is a 12 -acre residential development in City of Anaheim
consisting of 75 single family residential lots, open space areas utilized as community parks
with bio - swales, proprietary bio - filtration systems and underground detention chambers.
Detention chambers are utilized to capture the storm water runoffs from the majority of
development site since infiltration for the project site is infeasible. The underground
detention chambers for the project site are designed as a series of corrugated metal pipes
(CMP) sized to hold both the Design Capture Volume (DCV) which is the 85th percentile, 24-
hour storm event with peak flows per 100 -year storm event. Peak flows are mitigated to equal
or be less than the site pre - development flows. Low flow from the detention chambers is
conveyed into a proprietary bio- filtration structure for treatment. The bio- filtration structure
is a Modular Wetland System (MWS) designed specifically as a volume -based structure to
both treat the DCV and drawdown the DCV within 48 hours. For portion of the site that does
not drain into detention chambers, flows from the street are conveyed by series of curb
opening into a vegetated bio -swale for treatment. The vegetated bio -swale system provides
for pollutant removal through settling and filtration via the vegetation lining the channels.
The bio -swale also incorporates a sub -drain system that connects to the storm drain system
where treated flow is captured and conveyed to the storm drain system.
PRIME FIRM: Adams Streeter
COMPLETED: 2017 (Other Phases On- Going)
CLIENT: TRI Pointe Homes
Rick Wood, Vice President of Project Management
949 - 478 -8638; Rick.Wood @TRIPointehomes.com
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 14
ON -CALL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONTRACT, ,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Client /Owner: Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Performance Period: 2020 -- Ongoing Since 2011
ECORP has held two on -call contracts with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
(District) to provide environmental and regulatory services for District projects throughout western Riverside.
Examples of task orders conducted as part of this contract include:
• IS /MND, Technical Studies, and Regulatory Permitting for the Gilman Home Channel Improvement Project
(Banning)
• Short Notice Environmental Services Response to Emergency Situations during the El Nino Rain Season
• Biological, Cultural, and Air Quality Services for the Woodcrest Dam Outlet Modification Project
• Addendum EIR, Technical Studies, and Regulatory Permitting for the Lakeland Village Master Drainage Plan
(MDP)
• Invasive Species Control Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP) for the Banning Master Drainage Plan
Line H Stage 1 Project
• IS /MND, Air Quality /Greenhouse Gas Memorandum, Aquatic Resources Delineation and Cultural and Biological
Surveys for the Wildomar Master Drainage Plan Lateral C Revision Project
• Construction Worker Training for Archaeological Resources Paleontological Resources, and Hazardous
Materials for Three District Construction Projects
References:
• Joan Valle, Associate Engineer, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District,
(951) 955 -8856, Ivalle @rivco.or
• Nancy Sansonetti, AICP, Planner III, San Bernardino County Department of Public Works
(909) 387 -7876, nancy.sansonetti@dpw.sbcounty.gov
• George Zakhari, Associate Water Quality Engineer, Golden State Water Company, (760) 515 -8322,
George.Zakhari @gswater.com
CITY PARKING LOT D IMPROVEMENTS, HERMOSA BEACH, ti
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Client /Owner: City of Hermosa Beach (subcontractor to Adams - Streeter Civil Engineers, Inc.)
Performance Period: 2018
_..e ECORP prepared a CECIA Categorical Exemption (CE) with Technical
Studies for improvements to a 0.25 -acre public parking lot that is in
p disrepair. This multi- benefit demonstration project is the first of its
.. =
kind undertaken by the City as a pilot program for potential future
implementation at other City facilities. Project water quality
- enhancements include: Storm water collection via permeable paver
• °`° system, storm water treatment via a Modular Wetlands unit, storm
water storage, harvesting and reuse via a cistern /pump manhole
and irrigation control system, and storm water infiltration via
bioswale demonstration planter. The project includes drought
`Cn0FHERMo5A T H tolerant landscaping, tree planting, ADA improvements, enhanced
lighting and electrical upgrades, a bicycle corral, electric vehicle charging stations, and storm water capture and retention.
Reference: Reed Salan, Associate Engineer, Public Works Department, (310) 318 -0229, rsalan @hermosabch.o
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 15
Summerly Recycled Waterline, Lake Elsinore
Client: RW Beck
Project Period:2009 -2010
Contact: Mr. Stephen Dopudja, Vice President
West Yost (formerly RW Beck)
(949) 517 -9060
sdopudla @westyost.com
Field exploration, soil testing, design and construction services for a 30 -inch waterline for the Elsinore Valley
Municipal Water District. The new line extended over 5,000 linear feet and included a crossing under the San
Jacinto River which required 35- to 50 -foot deep jack and bore pits. Excavations and dewatering during
construction showed very permeable conditions in the native earth units.
Corporate Yard Infiltration Ponds, City of Corona
Client: City of Corona
Project Period: 2014
Contact: Mr. Vernon R. Weisman, P.E., District Engineer
City of Corona Department of Water and Power, Public Works Department
(951) 739 -4912
vernon.weisman @CoronaCA.gov
City improvement project consisting of geotechnical exploration and infiltration study within an existing 3.4 -acre
infiltration pond. NMG provided geotechnical review and field percolation testing to evaluate soil layers below
the basin. Percolation testing was performed at depths between 5 and 20 feet to assist in design of basin
reconfiguration and grading to achieve increased infiltration performance.
Veterans Park Storm Water Diversion and Infiltration, Redondo Beach
Client: AKM Consulting Engineers
Project Period: 2017
Mr. John Loague, Engineer
(949) 753 -7333 x103
0loague @akmce.com
Exploration including borings and in -situ percolation testing for proposed storm drain improvements and a
network of subterranean infiltration galleries. The exploration involved city encroachment permitting and
exploration and testing within an active /existing public park. Percolation testing was governed by County of Los
Angeles Guidelines. The project included a feasibility study and development of a design infiltration rates.
Camellia Court, City of Alhambra, California
Client: Lennar
Project Period: 2018 — 2020
Client: Mr. Dan Hosseinzadeh, Project Manager
(949)349-8215
Dan.Hosseinzadeh @lennar.com
This approximately 12 -acre mixed use development utilized both infiltration chambers and deep drywell
systems. NMG performed Cone Penetration Testing (CPTs) to obtain continuous soil stratigraphic information
coupled with hollow -stem auger borings in order to develop a subsurface stratigraphic profile of the site. Both
near surface and deep percolation testing was performed, up to 60 feet below existing grade, in order to provide
design infiltration rates for the proposed infiltration systems.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 16
C. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH
THE PURPOSE of this project is to implement simple and cost - effective drainage improvements to alleviate
flooding within the "Avenues" residential neighborhood from hillside runoff. The project will generally entail a
drainage study of the "Avenues" Drainage Study Area in conjunction with the review of the Master Drainage
Plan (MDP) prepared in October 2016 for the development of drainage concept alternatives and associated
costs for the City's consideration. Final project plans will be prepared based on the City - selected alternative for
implementation. An appropriate CEQA document (IS /ND or IS /MND) will also be prepared to support the project
based on the City's selection of drainage alternatives to be implemented.
Design parameters identified in the RFP calls for the following to be incorporated in developing drainage
alternatives for the project:
• Emphasis on value engineering where proposed design alternatives are simple and cost - effective.
• Improvements that will result in minimal impacts to the surrounding community.
• Alternatives that can be developed and designed within a short timeframe (6 months) to coincide with
the Downtown Streets Paving Phase II Project that will be ready for construction in April 2021, based
on a kick off meeting date of October 1, 2020.
Per the RFP, the MDP identified a total of seventy -nine (79) drainage issue locations, including for the top ten
flooding locations provided by City staff. Three of the top ten locations that are adjacent and within the
"Avenues" Drainage Study Area are identified as (A) High Street / Park Way e/o of Lakeshore Drive, (B) Pepper
Street / Dawes Street, and (C) Avenue 6 / Lakeshore Drive, as illustrated by Figure "P -1" on Page 18. The MDP
is not available for review during the proposal process to discern the drainage alternatives proposed to address
the current flooding condition. However, RFP Figure A — Lake Zone MDP indicate that the ultimate
improvements would be to provide underground storm drain systems (Lines L -10 through L -13) to capture and
convey hillside run -off to Lake Elsinore. Implementation of the ultimate improvements will require a
considerably longer timeline for design, environmental determination, permitting, and funding that may not be
currently available to the City. In addressing the City's desire to mitigate drainage concerns within the short
timeline and in consideration of funding constraints, stopgap alternatives will be needed to eliminate or reduce
the potential of private property flooding and long -term ponding within the "Avenues" streets, and at the
above - mentioned issue locations.
INITIAL ASSESSMENTS of this project identified two factors that needs to be considered in developing the
drainage improvement alternatives, as follows:
Potential 5.7 -acre development of a Senior Independent Living Facility (or any potential future private
development) along the Lakeshore Drive northerly frontage within the limits of the "Avenues" from
Center Street to Avenue 3, encompassing properties defined by APNs 373 - 185 -022 (0.62 AC), 373 -185-
023 (0.40 AC), 373 - 185 -036 (0.60 AC), 373 - 185 -037 (0.10 AC), 373 - 185 -038 (0.29 AC), 373 - 185 -046 (3.00
AC) and 373 - 176 -019 (0.71 AC), as illustrated by Figure "P -1" on Page 18, and the Assessor's Maps
provided in the Appendix as reference. The Assessor's Maps indicate property ownership of APNs 373-
176 -019 and 373 - 185 -046 by the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway (AT &SF RR). It is likely that the
old railroad properties would have been quit - claimed to the City so it is not clear if the railroad property
would be privately developed, available as City -owned property to be utilized in the City's interests, or
both. Based on the City's General Plan Land Use Map, the AT &SF RR properties are zoned for Residential
Mixed Use (see Figure "P -2" on Page 19). Collaboration with City staff regarding the disposition of the
old AT & SF RR frontage properties that could potentially be used for drainage improvement purposes
will be crucial for the development of drainage improvement alternatives.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 17
lip, 33 I +q
dL
I y _
f • - L it
mc
q
Avenue I
�~ q_
r. #�
'
MWIStre
mkim 0,
LL
i r -
11 cm
_ 71T-,
U
Pepperl
-
a. .s
r
� F
3
Pik
F �a 0=. ?olu
lot -rrini imp c)-' I
ly
L.641iii
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 18
• The undeveloped hillside (Elsinore Heights) area north of Mill Street between Country Club Boulevard
and Avenue 6 that contributes run -off to Mill Street and the "Avenues" appears to be partially graded
to support streets and subdivision development. The Assessor's Maps provided as reference in the
Appendix indicate the land within this area has already been subdivided. Based on the City's General
Plan Land Use Map, the land is zoned for Low- Medium Residential use (see Figure "P -2" below). Certain
lots appear to be listed for sale individually so it is not apparent if the area in its entirety will be
developed as part of a larger residential tract development by a housing developer, or lots sold to
individual owners. If the area is being developed as part of a larger residential tract development, storm
drain improvements as shown on RFP Figure A — Lake Zone MDP may be necessary in order to mitigate
the increase in storm run -off resulting from the increase in impervious areas. The MDP's storm drain
improvements could either be constructed by the developer as part of the Conditions -of- Approval, or
by the City through developer fund contributions and /or other funding sources. Based on the
information presented in the RFP, storm drain improvements as shown in the RFP Figure A — Lake Zone
MDP (Lines L -10 through L -13) is not anticipated to be implemented in the near future. Since it is
unclear when the area will be developed, stopgap drainage improvement alternatives will be needed
to serve the community prior to master planned improvements being implemented. The drainage
alternatives will also consider potential future integration with master - planned improvements when it
is realized. Collaboration with City staff regarding the details and disposition of the hillside development
will be crucial in accessing drainage improvement alternatives.
Drainage improvement alternatives developed for the project should consider downstream issues in regards to
potential flooding of private property and long -term ponding adjacent to the northerly frontage areas along
Lakeshore Drive. Consideration should also be given to provide potential mitigation at upstream locations
where significant run -off is being contributed from the hillside areas to Mill Street. The "Avenues" streets may
not have adequate capacity to contain the significant hillside run -off within the street (or street right -of -way),
which could potentially result in private property flooding. Erosion and sediments from hillside run -off are also
of particular concern. Excessive flow amounts and high flow velocities experienced by the "Avenues" streets
will also lead to premature pavement deterioration and will continue to be a maintenance item of concern if
the issue is not addressed.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 19
Alternative downstream drainage improvements apart from the ultimate master - planned storm drain
improvements shall address the issues related to long -term ponding and potential private property flooding at
the three downstream locations identified by the MDP, and as shown in Figure "P -1" on Page 18 that includes:
(A) High Street / Park Way east of Lakeshore Drive
(B) Pepper Street / Dawes Street, and
(C) Avenue 6 / Lakeshore Drive
The area's tributary drainage pattern generally flows in a southerly direction from the hillside areas through the
"Avenues" streets and ultimately drains to Lake Elsinore. Based on the City's Flood Zones Map, the "Avenues"
streets including the northerly frontage of Lakeshore Drive is not within the 100 -year or 500 -year flood zones
(see Figure "P -3" below). However, Lakeshore Drive that traverses in an east -west direction may act as a
physical barrier that impedes run -off from draining south towards the lake. Ponding is anticipated to occur
along the northerly frontage of Lakeshore Drive within the old AT &SF RR properties before the water is able to
breach above the roadway and continue draining south towards the lake, resulting in long -term ponding.
Specific drainage patterns within the "Avenues" streets and undeveloped northerly frontage areas of Lakeshore
Drive is shown in Figure "P -4" on Page 21. Run -off from the hillside areas draining to Mill Street generally occurs
at the intersections of Avenue 1, Crescent Drive, and Pell Street, corresponding to locations "D ", "E" and "F"
respectively. Run -off will flow from upstream locations along the "Avenues" streets to four downstream
locations identified as "D2" through "D5" on Figure "P -4 ", where street run -off discharges to the undeveloped
northerly frontage areas along Lakeshore Drive.
Per Figure "P -4 ", run -off originating from hillside locations "D" and "E" will flow towards discharge points "D2"
and "D3" (see "orange" arrows). Existing run -off at "D3" flow towards "D2" via Park Way and overland flow
along the Lakeshore Drive northerly frontage area. Run -off from "D2" will flow towards "D1" where a double -
pipe headwall inlet conveys and disperse the runoff to the south side of Lakeshore Drive. Runoff originating
from hillside location "F" will flow towards discharge points "D4" and "D5" and congregate /pond within the
Lakeshore Drive northerly frontage area located between Avenue 3 and Avenue 6 (see "green" arrows).
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 20
v ��S
AdL -�
# a
P
Ni
r
a
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 21
The segment of Park Way between High Street and Avenue
1 carries most of the run -off generated from the hillside
areas (locations "D" and "E ") and the "Avenues"
- _ neighborhood to "D2 ", which is consistent with the severe
pavement deterioration observed. As stated, some of the
runoff diverts to the undeveloped area along the northerly
frontage of Lakeshore Drive and flow towards "D2 ". Since
e : J �? -i, f ��, P4� ^���f_ the strip of land fronting this segment of Park Way
represents vacant private properties, routing run -off
through private property to provide some relief to Park Way
is currently not a viable option. Any formalized drainage
improvement alternatives to direct drainage towards the
undeveloped frontage area from "D3" will require an
easement from the private property owner and may not be
feasible until such time when the City decides to implement
masterplan improvements for the "Line L -11" storm drain as
shown in RFP Figure A— Lake Zone MDP and Figure "P -1" on
Page 18). Drainage improvements along this segment of
Park Way may also be needed to support any future development within the private frontage properties (such
as the potential development for the Senior Independent Living Facility). Park Way may be repaved and
improved with an alley gutter to promote better flow conveyance. However, alternatives should also be
considered to reduce street flows to the extent possible, to minimize the potential of premature pavement
rutting due to water intrusion and scouring, and to reduce the potential of run -off intrusion into adjacent
residences. Table "T -1" on Page 28 provides a summary of preliminary alternatives that may be potentially
considered during the first phase of the project.
The High Street and Park Way intersection is identified as one of the top ten drainage issue location and
represents the point of convergence for hillside area run -off discharging to Mill Street at locations "D" and "E ",
and the "Avenues" neighborhood areas between High Street and Avenue 4. Minimally, curb and gutter
extensions on High Street and cross - gutters across Park Way and High Street may be constructed to convey run-
off to discharge point "D2" efficiently (see above illustration). Discharge point "D2" appears to be a localized
low -point that ponds even under dry- weather flow conditions. Ideally, flows should be unimpeded between
"D2" and "D1" which suggest that elevations within this undeveloped triangular- shaped area be verified via
field survey. A number of alternative drainage improvements may be considered to effectively capture and
convey run -off from "D2" to "D1 ", and potentially also provide for flow routing and infiltration at this location,
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 22
in consideration of the significant run -off. Table "T -1" on Page 28 provides a summary of preliminary
alternatives that may be considered during the first phase of the project. Collaboration with City staff regarding
the disposition of the old AT & SF RR frontage properties that makes up the undeveloped triangular- shaped
area that could potentially be privately developed, used for drainage improvement purposes, or both will be
essential in the development /selection of implementable drainage improvement alternatives at this location.
Partial implementation of master -plan improvements to
include portions of Line L -10 consisting of 33" RCP, 36"
of
RCP and 60" RCP pipe segments (depicted in yellow in the
* }' illustration at left) between "D2" and "D1" could be
further evaluated if needed, for the conveyance of run -off
to the south side of Lakeshore Drive. This scenario will
require inlet facilities at "D1" and "D2 ", a "bore and jack"
i # of the 60" RCP pipe segment under Lakeshore Drive, and
an interim 60" outlet structure at the south side of
Lakeshore Drive. The existing two street catch basins on
F Lakeshore Drive and the existing headwall culvert system
A at "D1" may be left in -place for future integration into the
storm drain system when master -plan improvements are
fully realized. The scope of this particular alternative does
not conform to RFP's intent and design parameters and is
not anticipated to be a viable option for this project, also in consideration of funding and time constraints.
Potential constraints related to pipe cover /depths, and existing grade limitation could also make it unfeasible
for the pipe segments to be constructed in the interim. This concept is only provided hereon as an option that
could be explored further, if the City desires to do so.
1
The Pepper Street and Dawes Street intersection is also
identified as one of the top ten drainage issue location and
31 r
represents the point of convergence for hillside area run -off
discharging to Mill Street at location "F ", and the "Avenues"
neighborhood areas between Avenue 4 and Avenue 5 (see Figure --
"P -4" on Page 21). Run -off to Pepper Street from Park Way is _
conveyed to the west side of the Pepper Street via a cross - gutter
located immediately downstream of Park Way (see picture at
right), and generally ponds at the northwesterly corner of the CO`Ir1�1�` /(L`� }�`�r''`"
Pepper Street and Dawes Street intersection, adjacent to a residential property. The portion of Dawes Street
from Pepper Street to the westerly terminus including the adjacent undeveloped area also appears to be flat.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 23
Google Earth aerial photos of the Pepper Street and Dawes Street intersection as provided above indicates
ponding within the intersection area, which suggest the location to be a localized low point. The aerial photos
which were taken at different time periods also suggests that the extent of flooding at this location may have
extended into private property, including for the property at the northwesterly corner. Per the aerials, grading
is apparent at the property between February 2016 and October 2016. The raised pad along with the perimeter
retaining wall was then constructed prior to February 2018, which was likely performed by the property owner
as a preventive measure against run -off intrusion into the property.
It is further apparent from the June 2012 aerial (see above) that run -off from Pepper Street will confluence with
run -off from Avenue 6 that ponds at the Avenue 6 / Lakeshore Drive intersection due to the close proximity of
locations "B" and "C ". Per the RFP, Avenue 6 and Lakeshore Drive is also identified as a top ten drainage issue
-� location. To negate ponding adjacent to the
yxh private property at the northwesterly
corner of Pepper Street and Dawes Street,
Pepper Street's westerly curb and gutter
and AC pavement could be extended to
• ""�' �,�, -'� Dawes Street and cross - gutters provided to
- # effectively convey run -off to the
undeveloped AT &SF RR area (see
z --,�
r ti - illustrated at left). Optionally, AC berms
may also be considered for placement at
the northeasterly corner to help negate
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 24
run -off intrusion into the adjacent private property. Run -off that converges to this location (within the
undeveloped AT & SF RR area) does not have the opportunity to flow across Lakeshore Drive unless the water
ponds high enough to breach the roadway. Potential flooding and long -term ponding within this area is
anticipated unless drainage facilities can be provided to mitigate significant flows from the hillside areas and
the "Avenues" neighborhood. Partial implementation of master - planned improvements related to Line L -12 (or
related improvements) for the purpose of conveying run -off across Lakeshore Drive from this area is not feasible
due to grade, funding, and other constraints. Since flows cannot be conveyed away from this location until such
time when master - planned improvements are realized, storage and infiltration of run -off within the
undeveloped AT & SF RR area may be the only plausible alternative that could help prevent potential area
flooding and long -term ponding. Storage and infiltration facilities implemented at this juncture can also be
integrated into the larger master - planned improvements in the future. Utility considerations within the
undeveloped AT & SF RR area minimally includes surface utility poles and underground trunk sewer. Table "T-
1" on Page 28 provides a summary of preliminary alternatives that may be considered during the first phase of
the project for this location.
Alternative upstream drainage improvements for the project should consider the potential mitigation of
hillside run -off to Mill Street at the Avenue 1, Crescent Drive, and Pell Street intersections corresponding to
locations "D ", "E" and "F" respectively, as shown in Figure "P -5" below.
x a ~
a +Line L•17 +r +
x q -tae ..,, _
RCP T 3$ RCP a3 �r kYk f
fir
Lill &L -7} Aid -s
AVEMJt 7
AVE.WLI 1 L
4 � h
+la °RCp 1 - '3fi` kCP�
Gn RCP
+4
NCH
I
WWW � :- 'A FIGURE rr�__5
Master - planned storm drain improvements shown on RFP Figure A — Lake Zone MDP and Figure "P -5" above
indicate a peak run -off of 111 CFS at the upstream pipe segment of Line "L -11 ", which corresponds to the 100 -
year storm flows from the hillside areas to Mill Street at locations "D" and "E ". Peak run -off storm flows for
Line "L -12" conveying hillside area run -off at location "F" is not shown for the upstream pipe segment but is
anticipated to be similar to that of Line "L -11 ". Due to the significant hillside run -off contributions to Mill Street,
provisions for the capture and storage of run -off should be provided at these locations in order to limit flows
from discharging to Mill Street, to the extent possible. Detention basins and other facilities can potentially be
constructed at these locations for that purpose, and to address erosion and sediment transport issues. Limiting
run -off volume to Mill Street will also help to lower flow velocities within the streets. Determination of
minimum storage volumes to adequately size the detention basins (or other storage facilities) in order for 100-
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 25
year storm event run -off to be contained within the right -of -way will involve hydrologic related calculations
that involves the following:
• Determination /verification of MDP 100 -year peak flow values at locations "D ", "E ", and "F ".
• Determination /verification of MDP 100 -year drainage sub -area peak flows within the "Avenues" area,
corresponding to drainage from locations D ", "E ", and "F ".
• Determination of flow capacities of each "Avenues" streets (based on flow depths within the street
ROW) along the flow routes corresponding to locations "D ", "E ", and "F ", as depicted in Figure "P -5" on
Page 13. The lowest capacity observed within the street segments along each flow route will
conservatively be utilized to determine the required storage volume for upstream detention.
• Develop a 24 -hour, 100 -year storm event hydrograph representing the hillside area to determine the
storage volume for detention.
• Perform routing calculations to verify volume and peak discharge for the purpose of retaining excess
100 -year flows that cannot be contained within the "Avenues" streets.
As mentioned, potential drainage related facilities to intercept and detain hillside run -off at locations "D ", "E",
and "F" could be placed within the street right -of -way, as illustrated below by the yellow - highlighted areas.
Vacant lots within the immediate areas are highlighted in green.
n
Per the Assessor's Maps, street right -of -way at locations "D ", "E ", and "F" corresponding to Avenue 1 /Flagstaff
Road, Crescent Drive, and Pell Street is indicated as 50' wide. In consideration of the steep topography and
anticipated hillside runoff at locations "D ", "E ", and "F ", the available areas within the street right -of -way may
be insufficient in size to provide full detention of hillside run -off, and will require further analysis through
methods as described above. Maintaining property access for adjacent existing residences at locations "D" and
"E" (and also to other interior hillside properties) must also be considered in developing the alternate drainage
facilities within the right -of -way. Existing driveway locations for consideration at locations "D" and "E" are
denoted by red - rectangles on the above illustration. It is unclear if adjacent vacant lots may potentially be
utilized for interim facilities so further collaboration with City staff in developing the drainage strategies for the
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 26
upstream locations is imperative. Drainage facilities implemented at these locations are assumed to be interim
in nature until such time when master- planned improvements can be implemented. However, any
underground storage facilities, if opted, could be designed as permanent facilities for future integration into
master - planned facilities.
Potential drainage implementations that may be considered at locations
"D ", "E ", and "F" range from surface facilities such as detention basins
to underground facilities such as pre -cast underground storage
vaults /galleries. Grading of the immediate areas to accommodate
proposed facilities including berms and other appurtenances is also
anticipated at these locations. Since these locations lie within the
existing hillside, geotechnical investigation and site borings will be
needed to verify underlying soils and the potential for shallow bedrock
that could directly influence the selection of drainage alternatives to
detain hillside runoff, and for post -storm discharge options. Depending
on underlying soils and bedrock, shallow infiltration associated with
drainage facilities may be better suited at these locations as opposed to
deeper infiltration methods associated with the use of dry wells or deep
infiltration vault /galleries. Table "T -1" on Page 28 provides a summary
of preliminary alternatives that may be potentially considered during
the first phase of the project.
Flow routing strategies for the distribution of runoff between the
"Avenues" street may also be considered. However, routing strategies
via surface means that can potentially be implemented is fairly limited,
and will largely depend on the amount of run -off being contributed to
locations "D ", "E ", and "F ", the amount of run -off being carried by each
street (including hillside and "Avenues" area run -off), and the existing
street flow patterns as indicated by Figure "P -5" on Page 13.
Initial observations of existing street flow patterns suggest the following:
Hillside run -off at location "D" that flows to Avenue 1 cannot be routed anywhere else as this location
represents a localized low point on Mill Street. Existing cross - gutters span across Mill Street channeling
flows to Avenue 1.
+ Portions of the hillside run -off from location "E" that flows westerly along Mill Street to location "D"
may be minimized by installing cross - gutters across Mill Street at the Avenue 2 intersection, if needed.
4 Portions of the hillside run -off from location "F" that flows westerly along Mill Street towards Avenue
3 may be minimized by installing cross - gutters across Mill Street at the Avenue 4 intersection, and
grading of berms within the Pell Street right -of -way if needed.
Avenue 1 through 5 that directly convey flows from upstream to downstream areas of the "Avenues"
neighborhood is anticipated to have larger flow capacities due to the steep street gradients, as opposed to the
downstream streets with lesser gradients that receive run -off from the "Avenues" streets. Existing street flow
patterns as indicated by Figure "P -5" on Page 13 suggests that Park Way would receive most of the run -off from
location "D ", "E ", and "F" and could potentially dictate the sizing of upstream detention facilities.
A summary of preliminary alternatives that may potentially be considered during the first phase of the project
for both upstream and downstream locations is tabulated as follows:
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 27
TABLE T -1— SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL DRAINAGE ALTERNATIVES
ITEM / LOCATION
POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS 1
1. Park Way Between High Street
Alley gutter along centerline of Park Way.
and Avenue 1
Curb and gutter and /or AC berm on north side of street for additional
(Discharge Point "D3" to "D2 ")
protection against water intrusion into existing residences. Berm
along the south side of street is not currently recommended to
permit excess run -off to overflow to the undeveloped area at the
south side in order to protect against property flooding of the existing
residences along the north side of the street.
Slotted drain CMP pipe along center of alley gutter with optional
inlets at fixed intervals to decrease surface street flows. This option
would require connection to drainage facilities proposed at the High
Street and Parkway intersection, if opted (see item #2 below).
2. High Street & Park Way —
Curb and gutter extension on High Street to Lakeshore Dr.
Location "A"
Cross - gutters at the High Street and Park Way intersection.
(Discharge Point "D2" to "D1")
Street catch basin at point D2 for capture of run -off.
Graded natural swale, concrete channel or pipe for effective flow
conveyance between "D2" and "131 ".
Detention basin for run -off storage and flow routing prior to draining
at "131 ", and for infiltration purposes.
Optional single or linked dry well systems for infiltration purposes and
additional storage.
Optional and partial implementation of master -plan improvements,
Line "L -10" between "D1" and "D2" (not anticipated).
3. Pepper St. & Dawes St. —
Pavement extension at the terminus of Pepper Street (paved section)
Location "B"
to Dawes Street, including the westerly curb and gutter (and
(Discharge Point "D4 ")
sidewalk, if needed).
Cross - gutters across Dawes Street.
Optional AC berm along the northeasterly corner of the intersection.
(see additional improvements per item #4 below)
4. Lakeshore Drive & Avenue 6 —
Detention basin for runoff storage and infiltration.
Location "C"
Underground storage / infiltration galleries.
(Discharge Point "D5 ")
Optional single or linked dry well systems for infiltration purposes and
additional storage.
5. Locations "D ", "E" and "F"
Miscellaneous grading, berms, and access routing, as needed.
Detention basin or underground pre -case storage vaults /galleries for
storage /infiltration of run -off.
Optional cross - gutters across Mill Street at locations "E" and "F" for
surface flow routing (if warranted).
1 Potential drainage improvement alternatives shown above are based on initial observations only. This initial
list will be reviewed in detail and expanded upon during the initial project phase to develop a comprehensive
assessment of available and implementable alternative.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 28
D. SCOPE OF WORK PROGRAM
The culmination of required tasks associated with the overall approach by ASCE and team sub - consultant firms
are reflected in the below scope of work, in accordance with the RFP.
PHASE 1A - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
TASK
SUMMARY OF WORK ITEMS
1.
Meetings, Project Management and Coordination
A. Project management and governmental coordination, including with the City's project
administrator / project manager and the City's Engineering Department preparing the Downtown
Streets Paving Phase II Project.
B. Kick off and initial collaboration meeting with City staff on potential concept drainage alternative,
available construction funding, project schedule, etc.
C. Second collaboration meeting to review and solidify drainage concept alternatives w/ City staff
prior to finalizing and submittal of the Drainage Study.
D. Attend City Council meeting (one meeting anticipated).
2.
Information Research
A. Research and review City record drawings and maps (provided by City).
B. Notify purveyors, request for utility atlas and maps, and coordination as necessary during the
drainage concept alternative development process.
3.
Mapping and Initial Field Survey Verifications
A. Research and analyze underlying record maps for property and right -of -way information,
including for records of surveys, parcel and tract maps, survey benchmarks and control, etc.
Review available right -of -way, potential easements, etc., and identify site constraints
corresponding to applicable drainage concept alternative site locations.
B. Order a title search and title report to support initial research and mapping efforts, and for the
preparation of plats and legal descriptions as needed in Phase 2 of the project.
C. Perform initial topographic survey / field verifications for features and grades to support the
development of drainage concept alternatives.
D. Perform and develop base maps that will be utilized as the basis for design. Developed base maps
will be based on paper boundary. Boundary surveys are not anticipated and not included in the
scope of work.
4.
Drainage Study
A. Perform a field review to assess site conditions and constraints. Review site topographical survey,
right -of -way and property boundaries, and location and depths of existing utilities for the
development of project parameters and constraints.
B. Coordinate and review site and sub - surface conditions w/ the geotechnical engineer for the
development of drainage concept alternatives.
C. Review the Master Drainage Plan (MDP) to verify drainage sub - areas, peak run -off and other
pertinent information as it relates to the development of drainage concept alternatives.
D. Develop drainage concept alternatives (minimum of two alternatives). Perform hydrology, basin
routing and sizing, street flows and other calculations in support of concept alternatives.
E. Develop concept -level cost estimates for drainage alternatives presented in the Drainage Study.
F. Prepare a Drainage Study Report outlining the drainage concept alternatives and associated
estimated costs for implementation.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 29
PHASE 1A - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING - CONTINUED
TASK
SUMMARY OF WORK ITEMS
S.
Geotechnical Exploration, Analysis and Reporting (By NMG Geotechnical)
A. Background Review, Project Initiation, and Permitting: Review of available published and
unpublished geotechnical and groundwater data pertaining to the site. Review of the initial project
design information and coordination with the project team. NMG will acquire all necessary
encroachment and temporary water access permits (assumed "No Fee ") for drilling and percolation
testing. We anticipate that a plan will be provided to NMG showing the conceptual design and
existing topography and utilities that may be used for permitting purposes.
B. Subsurface Exploration and Percolation Testing: NMG will perform a site reconnaissance to review
and mark boring locations. Prior to drilling, we will coordinate with USA and the City for existing
utility clearance. Once utilities have been marked, we will review the field markings for potential
conflicts and make any necessary adjustments. We propose to drill 4 hollow -stem auger borings
ranging from 10 to 50 feet deep (or refusal). Heavy equipment will be subject to prevailing wage.
Soil will be sampled at 2.5- to 5 -foot intervals utilizing Modified California sampling methods. We
anticipate that a truck - mounted drill rig will be used for our geotechnical exploration and that the
scope of work can be performed in consecutive days during weekday daytime hours.
Percolation testing in 3 of the 4 proposed borings is anticipated and assumed to evaluate storm
water infiltration feasibility and provide design infiltration rates for test locations. Percolation
testing will be performed in accordance with the County of Riverside guidelines. Borings may be
left open for 24 to 48 hours in order to conduct testing after completion of drilling. All borings will
be backfilled after conclusion of percolation testing. We assume the borings will be performed
within existing unpaved road shoulders and /or vacant lots and that traffic control plans and /or
field traffic control will not be required. Percolation testing will require the use of select materials.
The soil cuttings generated at these locations will not be able to be placed back into the boring.
Excess soil cuttings will be spread thinly along adjacent dirt roadway shoulders or other designated
areas within City property.
C. Laboratory Testing: Laboratory testing will include moisture content and dry density of the
collected samples, grain -size distribution, and hydro - consolidation.
D. Geotechnical Analysis: Geotechnical evaluation and analysis of existing and collected data with
respect to infiltration of storm water at the site and associated design parameters. NMG will review
the project plan and perform engineering analyses for grading, liquefaction, and storm water
infiltration.
E. Geotechnical Report: One report will be prepared summarizing our findings and providing
recommendations for project improvements and infiltration BMPs. The report will include our
boring logs, laboratory data, percolation test data, and a boring location map. Assessment of
contaminated soils or other environmental issues are not included in our scope of services and is
the purview of others.
F. Project Management, Coordination, and Meetings: A total of 8 hours of project management,
coordination, consultation and meetings is assumed for the project.
OP -1
Optional Items - Additional Geotechnical Borings and Percolation Testing (Five Additional)
Additional borings and percolation testing in the event that testing would need to be expanded in order
to evaluate infiltration feasibility near High Street/ Park Way or at the proposed basin locations along
Mill Street. This additional scope includes five additional borings and percolation testing to characterize
the infiltration potential at these locations. Additional laboratory testing, data review /analysis, and
infiltration rate calculation associated with the additional borings is included in this task.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 30
PHASE 1B — CEQA DOCUMENTATION (BY ECORP CONSULTING)
TASK
SUMMARY OF WORK ITEMS
1.
CEQA Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS /MND)
A. Administrative Draft IS /MND and Project Description: An IS /MND will be prepared using the
approved checklist format from the City of Lake Elsinore or Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines.
ECORP will prepare a description of the project including the location of the project area (including
a project map), a brief description of the environmental setting, an identification of environmental
effects using the above - referenced checklist format, a brief substantiation of the checklist entries,
and a list of references and preparers. ECORP will provide mitigation measures (if required) that
can be developed using existing data. A site visit by an Environmental Scientist will be conducted.
The IS /MND will include modeling for air quality, greenhouse gas, noise, and energy impacts. The
modeling results will be included as appendices. We assume City will provide any previously
prepared technical reports, plans, and other project information, including electronic versions, to
the extent possible. Deliverables include:
• Project Description
• An electronic copy of the Administrative Draft IS /MND that will be submitted to the City
via email for review and comment.
B. Prepare and Distribute Draft IS /MND, Notice of Intent / Notice of Completion: After receipt of
one (1) set of integrated comments on the Administrative Draft IS /MND from the City, we will
revise the IS /MND accordingly. ECORP will provide five (5) bound copies and one (1) electronic
copy of the environmental document to the City for internal use. ECORP will mail twenty (20)
copies (on compact disc) of the document to addressees on the mailing list. ECORP will produce
and mail fifteen (15) hardcopies of the State Clearinghouse summary form and fifteen (15) CDs of
the entire document for submittal to the State Clearinghouse. We have assumed that the City and
ECORP will work together to assemble the mailing list. ECORP will prepare the following notices as
required by CEQA:
• Notice of Intent (NOI) to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Notice of Completion (State Clearinghouse Cover)
One copy of each of these notices will be filed with the Riverside County Clerk and the State
Clearinghouse, as appropriate. One electronic copy of each notice will be provided to the City. The
NOI is required by CEQA to be either posted on -site, mailed to the surrounding property owners,
or published in a newspaper of general circulation. For costing purposes, it has been assumed that
ECORP will arrange for the NOI to be published in a newspaper of general circulation. Deliverables
include:
• Five (5) bound copies and one (1) electronic copy of the Draft IS /MND for City use
• Twenty (20) copies of the Draft IS /MND to mailing list (on CD)
• Fifteen (15) copies of the State Clearinghouse summary form and fifteen (15) CDs of the
entire document for submittal to the State Clearinghouse
• Notice of Intent and Notice of Completion
• Newspaper ad for NOI
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 31
PHASE 1B — CEQA DOCUMENTATION (BY ECORP CONSULTING) - CONTINUED
TASK
SUMMARY OF WORK ITEMS
C. Administrative and Final IS /MND & MMRP: The Lead Agency (City) must consider any comments
received on the MND when making a decision on the project. For costing, we have assumed that
ten (10) comment letters containing four (4) comments each will be received (or a total of 40
comments). ECORP will collate all public comments and comment letters regarding the IS and
prepare written responses to comments for City review. It is assumed that City staff will receive all
comments and will forward to ECORP as soon as possible after receipt.
The Final IS /MND will include responses to comments received on the Draft IS /MND, any changes
to the Draft IS /MND, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), if required,
prepared in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15097. ECORP will prepare the MMRP in
table format, with input from the City. An Administrative Final IS /ND and MMRP will be prepared,
and after review by the City, the Final IS /MND and MMRP will be provided.
ECORP will prepare the Notice of Determination (NOD) as required by CEQA. A copy of the NOD
will be filed with the Riverside County Clerk and the State Clearinghouse, as appropriate, within
five business days of adoption the MND. An electronic copy of the NOD will be provided to the City.
It has been assumed that the City will pay any fees associated with this notice. Deliverables include:
• Electronic submittal of the Administrative Final IS /MND and MMRP
• Five (5) bound copies and one (1) electronic copy of the Final IS /MND and MMRP
• Notice of Determination
2.
Technical Studies
A. Biological Resources Assessment:
Our understanding is that the project site is located within the Western Riverside County Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan ( MSHCP) planning area. A brief review of the Riverside County
Integrated Project (RCIP) Conservation Summary Report Generator found that the project site is
not located within a narrow endemic plant species survey area, nor is it located within or
immediately adjacent to an MSHCP Conservation Area, but that the project site is located within a
designated survey area for burrowing owl. In order to determine whether sensitive biological
resources are present on the project site, a reconnaissance -level survey will be performed.
ECORP will conduct a biological reconnaissance survey of an approximate 10 -acre project area,
which is assumed to comprise proposed detention and /or infiltration basins. The survey would be
conducted in order to identify any potential biological constraints to development and, if
applicable, make recommendations based on the findings. Prior to conducting the site survey, the
biologist will conduct queries of the latest versions of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife
(CDFW) California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and California Native Plant Society (CNPS)
Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants. In addition, other documentation, range maps
of sensitive species, and other site - specific reports regarding biological resources that are relevant
to evaluating the biological resources on the site will be reviewed. Based on the literature review,
the biologists will identify the special- status species that could occur on the project site.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 32
PHASE 1B — CEQA DOCUMENTATION (BY ECORP CONSULTING) - CONTINUED
TASK
SUMMARY OF WORK ITEMS
Once the literature review is completed, ECORP biologists with knowledge of the species that could
occur on or in the vicinity of the project site will use the information as background information
and conduct the biological reconnaissance survey of the project site. Biological resources that are
known to occur or could occur on the property, such as burrowing owl, will be searched for during
the survey. The survey will consist of a site walkover, taking photographs to document the site
conditions, developing plant and wildlife species lists, and characterizing the habitat(s) within the
project site and surrounding area. The habitat assessment will identify any areas of suitable habitat
for sensitive plant and wildlife species that may or may not require focused wildlife surveys, and
any areas that may be potentially under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or
CDFW will be identified. If special- status species are detected, occurrences will be documented
using a global positioning system (GPS) device. During the survey, all burrows suitable for
burrowing owl use will be documented, in accordance with the Focused Burrow Survey protocol
(Step 2A) of the MSHCP Burrowing Owl Survey Guidelines (County of Riverside 2006). Biologists
will also document observations of live burrowing owls and their sign (e.g., whitewash, pellets,
bones of prey items, feathers).
If burrowing owl habitat is found to be present on the project site that is consistent with the
definition of habitat in Step 1 of the MSHCP burrowing owl survey guidelines (County of Riverside
2006), then the biologist will also examine areas within a 150 -meter buffer around the project area
for the presence of habitat. All areas surveyed will be physically traversed on foot, where access
permits. During the survey, all burrows suitable for burrowing owl use will be documented, in
accordance with the Focused Burrow Survey protocol (Step 2A) of the MSHCP burrowing owl
survey guidelines (County of Riverside 2006). Biologists will also document observations of live
burrowing owls and their sign (e.g., whitewash, pellets, bones of prey items, feathers).
Following the completion of the biological survey, ECORP will prepare a report that details the
results of the literature review and field survey. The report will include a description of the
proposed project, maps of the project site, methods used to conduct the survey, the survey results,
and special- status species potential for occurrence. Habitats, vegetation communities, and
biological constraints will be described in the report. The report will also present recommendations
for further work, if needed, including focused surveys for sensitive species. Impacts expected from
the proposed project will be identified along with mitigation measures to reduce them to below a
level of significance, as applicable. The report will serve as a support document for the
environmental documentation for the proposed project.
The report will conform to the information needed for review under CEQA and will fulfill the
requirements of an MSHCP Consistency Analysis. Per MSHCP reporting requirements, the following
sections will be included and analyzed in the context of the project:
• Section 6.1.2 Riparian /Riverine, Vernal Pool, and Fairy Shrimp Habitat Assessment
• Section 6.1.3 Narrow Endemic Plant Species
• Section 6.1.4 Urban /Wildlands Interface
• Section 6.3.2 Burrowing Owl Habitat Assessment
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 33
PHASE 1B — CEQA DOCUMENTATION (BY ECORP CONSULTING) - CONTINUED
TASK
SUMMARY OF WORK ITEMS
A draft version of the report will be submitted electronically for review. After receipt of one round of
compiled comments, a final version of the report will be prepared and submitted electronically to the
City. If requested by the City, ECORP will also submit the report to the County of Riverside through
their designated FTP site.
This task does not include a formal delineation of aquatic resources, focused (protocol - level) surveys
for special- status plant or wildlife species, or consultation or coordination with the regulatory
agencies, County, or City personnel. Deliverables include:
• Electronic copy of the draft and final report
B. Cultural Resources Study
Records Search. The cultural resources study will begin with a cultural resources records search at
the Eastern Information Center (EIC) located on the University of California, Riverside campus. The
records search will identify the locations and extent of previous surveys conducted within one mile
of the project site and will determine if there are any known cultural resources (i.e., prehistoric or
historic archaeological sites or historic - period features) located within or near the project site. In
addition, the records search will identify resources listed on or determined eligible for listing on
the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and /or the California Register of Historical
Resources (CRHR) located within or near the project site.
A search of the Sacred Lands File will be requested from the Native American Heritage Commission
(NAHC). The search will identify any known sensitive or sacred Native American resources located
within or near the project site. The Sacred Lands File Search will not constitute consultation in
compliance with Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52). It is assumed that the City of Lake Elsinore, as the CEQA
Lead Agency, will conduct all AB 52 consultation for the project.
Field Survey. ECORP will complete a field survey of the project site using pedestrian transect
intervals spaced no more than 15 meters apart. For the purposes of this scope and cost, ECORP
assumes that the project site will consist of three discontinuous sections that, together, total less
than 10 acres in size. The project area will be examined for evidence of cultural resources, including
prehistoric and historic - period (i.e., over 50 years of age) archaeological deposits and features. If
any resources are encountered, they must be recorded and mapped in detail in accordance with
the standards of the California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). Based on a review of aerial
photographs, the project sites are undeveloped. For costing purposes, ECORP assumes that no
cultural resources will be identified within the project site.
Technical Report. A cultural resources technical report will be prepared for the project. The report
will document the methods and results of the records search, Sacred Lands File search, and field
survey. The report will include a summary of the environmental setting and the prehistoric and
historic cultural background of the project site. Copies of correspondence with the NAHC will be
provided as an attachment to the report. One electronic copy of the draft report will be submitted
to the City. One (1) copy of the final report will also be submitted to the EIC for their files, as
required. ECORP will respond to one round of consolidated, non - conflicting comments on the draft
report.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 34
PHASE 1B — CEQA DOCUMENTATION (BY ECORP CONSULTING) - CONTINUED
TASK
SUMMARY OF WORK ITEMS
Note that recording and evaluation of archaeological sites or built environment resources is not
included in this task. If any resources are encountered that will require recording and evaluation, a
separate scope and cost estimate will be provided.
ECORP was recently notified by several Information Centers of the California Historical Resources
Information System of expected delays in processing or scheduling records search requests as a result
of the COVID -19 pandemic and the effect it is having on staffing levels and Information Center closures.
As a result, the schedule of completion of work under this task may be affected. ECORP will keep the
Client apprised of any schedule implications as they become known but will not be held responsible for
delays to the project as a result of Information Center closures or delays, or for any other delay caused
by factors outside the control of ECORP.
Paleontological Records Search. A paleontological records search and literature review will be
conducted with the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History (LACMNH). The records search will
include a review of known fossil localities in the project vicinity and an assessment of the potential for
the project site to contain buried paleontological resources based on geologic maps of the region. A
summary letter report will be prepared to document the results of the records search. Deliverables
include:
• Electronic copy of the draft and final cultural resources technical report
• Electronic copy of the draft and final paleontological summary letter report
It has been assumed that the data required to support and document answers to all other CEQA Initial
Study checklist items can be obtained from existing documentation (i.e., City of Lake Elsinore General
Plan and associated environmental documentation, floodplain maps, previous environmental
documentation in the vicinity of the project site, and other standard environmental references),
consultation with City staff, or information being prepared separately by the engineering team and its
subcontractors (e.g., geotechnical, hazardous materials, hydrology). ECORP will provide one electronic
copy (PDF) of the draft technical studies, delivered by email. After incorporating one round of compiled
comments, a final version of the studies will be submitted electronically in PDF form.
OP -2
Optional Technical Study - Focused Burrowing Owl Surveys
If burrowing owl habitat is found to be present on site (including the presence of suitably -sized
burrows), then focused burrowing owl surveys will need to be conducted in accordance with Section
6.3.2 of the MSHCP and the MSHCP burrowing owl survey guidelines (County of Riverside 2006).
The focused surveys will be conducted according to the guidelines provided in the MSHCP, which
requires four focused burrowing owl surveys be conducted between March 1 and August 31. Each of
the focused burrowing owl surveys will consist of initially conducting a visual survey of all suitable
habitat with special focus on any previously mapped burrows, owl sign and owls, including perch
locations, in order to ascertain owl presence. Following the visual survey, the survey for owls and owl
sign will then be performed within suitable habitat over the entire project site and the adjacent 150
meters, where accessible.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 35
PHASE 1B — CEQA DOCUMENTATION (BY ECORP CONSULTING) - CONTINUED
TASK
SUMMARY OF WORK ITEMS
These "pedestrian surveys" will be conducted by walking transects spaced approximately 10 to 30
meters apart in order to achieve 100 - percent visual coverage of the ground surface. During the
pedestrian surveys, the biologist will record all burrowing owl observations, occupied burrows, and
burrows with owl sign (whitewash, pellets, feathers, and bones of prey items) that were not previously
identified during the during the focused burrow survey. If live burrowing owls are present, then the
biologist will also note the number of individual owls, owl pairs, juveniles, and any behavior, such as
courtship and mating. The surveys will be conducted in the morning one hour before sunrise to two
hours after sunrise and /or in the early evening two hours before sunset to one hour after sunset during
favorable weather conditions (e.g., wind less than 20 miles per hour, temperature less than 90 degrees
Fahrenheit). All location data will be described on field data sheets and recorded using a GPS.
The results of the focused surveys will be included in a survey results report. The report will describe
the survey methodology, survey conditions, and results, including the locations of any burrowing owl
observations, occupied burrowing owl burrows, and potential burrows. The report will also include
maps depicting the project site, suitable burrowing owl habitat, and the locations of any burrowing owl
observations or burrows. Discussion of the survey results in the report will be in accordance with the
MSHCP consistency analysis requirements for burrowing owl surveys. A draft version of the report will
be submitted electronically for review. After receiving one round of compiled comments, a final version
will be prepared and submitted electronically. Deliverables include:
• Electronic copy of the draft and final report
OP -3
Optional Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
If the technical studies and IS identify an impact that would remain significant after mitigation
(potentially requiring an Environmental Impact Report [EIR]), then ECORP will immediately notify the
City /Adams- Streeter to determine if there may be an engineering solution to minimize or avoid the
impact. If the impact cannot be reduced to less than significant, an EIR will be required as described in
the scope of work below. It is our approach that the majority of the documentation in the EIR will be
focused on those issues where more information or analysis was required (e.g. hydrology), and a
determination of significance could not be made in the IS.
As determined by CEQA, the purpose of an EIR is to provide decision makers, public agencies, and the
general public with an objective and informative document that facilitates a basic understanding of the
proposed project, including direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental effects. The EIR also
identifies feasible mitigation measures to mitigate significant environmental effects. The City of Lake
Elsinore and other agencies will use the EIR to issue permits, agreements, and approvals to implement
portions of the project under their respective authorities.
A. Notice of Preparation /Scoping Meeting
Notice of Preparation: ECORP will prepare the Notice of Preparation (NOP), soliciting participation
in determining the scope of the EIR. The IS will be attached to the NOP. ECORP will distribute thirty
(30) copies of the approved IS /NOP package for distribution to the County Clerk, various public
agencies whose approval and /or comments are required (Responsible Agencies), agencies with
resources affected by the project (Trustee Agencies), and interested parties and groups
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 36
PHASE 1B — CEQA DOCUMENTATION (BY ECORP CONSULTING) - CONTINUED
TASK
SUMMARY OF WORK ITEMS
Within the 30 -day public review and comment period, Responsible Agencies, Trustee Agencies,
and members of the public may provide comments about the EIR contents and the project in
general.
Public Scoping Meeting: A public scoping meeting shall be scheduled to help the City further
understand community concerns and support for the project. A Public Meeting in an Open House
format will be held at the City offices during the 30 -day NOP review period. ECORP will plan and
facilitate the meeting, provide exhibits, handouts /fact sheets, and refreshments, and provide staff
for the sign -in table. At least one of these staff members will be English- Spanish bilingual. We have
assumed that the City will schedule (or provide a contact at the City so that ECORP may schedule)
the meeting room, and that tables, chairs, etc. will be provided by the City. The ECORP Project
Manager and one other technical staff would attend this meeting. We have assumed that City staff
and Adams - Streeter will also attend this meeting to answer questions.
B. Administrative Draft EIR
An Administrative Draft EIR will be submitted to the City for review and comment prior to the
preparation of the Draft EIR. The EIR will be prepared using technical reports provided by the City
and those prepared for the project. The EIR will include the topics for which impacts were identified
either as "potentially significant" or "less than significant with mitigation incorporated" in the IS
checklist. It is important to carry forward the mitigation required in the IS to the EIR, so that it will
be documented in the MMRP. However, it is our approach that the majority of the documentation
in the EIR will be focused on those issues where more information or analysis was required, and a
determination of significance could not be made in the IS. In addition, the EIR will discuss the extent
to which the project promotes growth directly or indirectly.
The EIR will also analyze up to two alternatives: an alternative of less intensive development, and
the No Project Alternative. We have assumed that the City /Adams- Streeter would provide any
engineering data required for the alternatives development. An "alternatives considered but
rejected" section will also be included in the EIR. A total of three (3) copies of the Administrative
Draft EIR will be provided to the City for review and comment. ECORP is prepared to meet with the
City to review the comments. Prior to circulation of the Draft EIR a screencheck copy of the
document will be provided to the City for approval.
C. Draft EIR and Notices
After review and comment on the Draft EIR, ECORP will revise the EIR and print sufficient copies
for public review. We will also prepare the Notice of Completion (NOC) and Notice of Availability
(NOA) to accompany the Draft EIR and for publication in a newspaper of general circulation. We
have made the following assumptions regarding document and notice circulation:
• ECORP will print and distribute 31 hard copies and 10 electronic copies of the EIR as
follows:
• Fifteen (15) copies will be sent to the State Clearinghouse
• Fifteen (15) hard copies and ten (10) electronic copies (PDF and MS WORD formats
on compact disc) of the Draft EIR will be provided to the City
• One (1) hard copy will be provided to the local library
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 37
PHASE 16 — CEQA DOCUMENTATION (BY ECORP CONSULTING) - CONTINUED
TASK
SUMMARY OF WORK ITEMS
• ECORP and the City will develop a list of interested agencies and other interested parties.
These agencies /individuals will be mailed a complete copy of the EIR. It is assumed that
the list will contain no more than 15 addresses.
• The City will provide a list of surrounding property owners. These owners will receive a
Notice of Availability, stating that the EIR is available for review at the Community
Development Department and at the library.
• ECORP will post the NOA with the County Clerk. We have assumed that ECORP will arrange
to have the notice published in the newspaper and that the City will pay all fees associated
with newspaper publication and with County Clerk filing.
D. Administrative Final EIR /Draft MMRP
ECORP will prepare an Administrative Final EIR, consisting of copies of comment letters received
on the Draft EIR, responses to these comments, any errata sheets required based on the
comments, and the Draft MMRP. We have assumed that up to 10 comment letters will be received
each with an average of four comments, or approximately 40 comments total. Three (3) copies of
the Administrative Final EIR and Draft MMRP will be prepared for City review. If necessary, a
second round of review and comment on the Administrative Final EIR and Responses to Comments
will be scheduled.
E. Final EIR /Final MMRP /Notice of Determination
After City comments on the Administrative Final EIR and Draft MMRP, ECORP will prepare the Final
EIR, MMRP, and the Notice of Determination (NOD). We will file the NOD with the County Clerk
and mail the Final EIR to the required agencies and individuals. We have assumed printing of ten
(10) Final EIRs. We will also prepare ten (10) electronic copies for the City in PDF and MS WORD
formats on compact discs. We have assumed that the City will pay all filing fees associated with
the County Clerk.
F. Statement of Overriding Considerations /Findings
If necessary, ECORP will prepare a Statement of Overriding Considerations and Findings. One draft
copy and one final copy will be submitted to the City.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 38
PHASE 2 - FINAL ENGINEERING
TASK
SUMMARY OF WORK ITEMS
1.
Meetings, Project Management and Coordination
A. Project management and governmental coordination, including with the City's project
administrator/ project manager and the City's Engineering Department preparing the Downtown
Streets Paving Phase II Project.
B. Pre - Design meeting to discuss design objectives pertaining to the selected design alternative, as
approved by City Council.
C. Subsequent collaboration conference calls and coordination in the process of finalizing the project
construction documents.
2.
Final Construction Documents
Prepare construction documents for the following items. Plan revisions and submittals is anticipated
to include the initial geometric drawing base sheet submittal and subsequent 65 %, 95% and 100%
(final) plan submittals. The type of plans anticipated for the project includes:
A. Grading and Drainage Plans
B. Street Improvement Plans
C. Erosion Control Plans
D. Bid Schedule, Special Provisions and Technical Specifications
E. Itemized Cost Estimates
F. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
G. Optional — Water Quality Management Plan (not anticipated)
3.
Design Topographical Survey
A. Perform design survey pertaining to the locations of the selected design alternative. Detailed
survey of surface features and grades, etc., will be provided to support final engineering design.
4.
Plats and Legal Descriptions
A. Prepare plats and legal descriptions pertaining to the locations of the selected design alternative
that identifies the boundaries of improvements within existing right -of -way and property
boundaries. Up to five plats and corresponding legal descriptions are assumed for budgetary
purposes.
PHASE 3 — BID AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
TASK
SUMMARY OF WORK ITEMS
1.
Bid and Construction Support
A. Attend a pre -bid meeting.
B. Respond to Contractor request for plan or other bid - related clarifications.
C. Review Request for Information (RFI) during the construction phase and provide written
responses for plan and /or other clarifications and /or recommendations.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 39
E. PROJECT SCHEDULE
A comprehensive Critical Path Method (CPM) schedule is provided on the following page in 11" x 17" format
that describes the nature and scheduling of proposed tasks based on the following RFP- stipulated milestones
for the project:
* Issuance of Notice -to- Proceed 9/25/2020
* City Kick -off Meeting 10/1/2020
* 65% Level Plan Completion By January 2021
* Overall Project Completion Prior to April 2021
Per the RFP - stipulated milestones, an accelerated schedule for project is required in order for the project to be
completed prior to April 2021. Additional streamlining of the schedule was further necessitated in consideration
of the approaching holiday season encompassing the Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Year holidays. The
project kick -off date and the requirement for the 65% level plans to be completed by January 2021 also dictates
the 12/2/2020 City Council meeting date indicated for the approval of the drainage concept alternative. Per the
City's calendar, the second City Council meeting on 12/22/2020 has been cancelled. The CPM schedule as is
currently shown suggests that no advancement or postponement can be made to the 12/2/2020 City Council
meeting date without compromising the RFP - stipulated milestones.
The anticipated CEQA process (IS /MND) for the project is of particular concern as it would generally require the
entire six months of project duration to complete, in consideration of the non - working days associated with the
holiday season. Because of the limited timeline prescribed for the project, the CEQA process must be initiated
close to the beginning of the project to allow sufficient time to perform the Technical Studies (and subsequent
processes) which includes the Biological Resources Assessment and Cultural Resources Study. Based on the
current CPM schedule, the study areas required for the Technical Studies should be identified by 10/8/2020 to
ensure completion of the CEQA process prior to April 2020. Further, our environmental team subconsultant
(ECORP Consulting) was recently notified by several Information Centers of the California Historical Resources
Information System of expected delays in processing or scheduling records search requests as a result of the
COVID -19 pandemic and the effect it is having on staffing levels and Information Center closures. This could be
another factor that could potentially affect the overall CEQA schedule that is not within the team's control. In
order to adhere to the CEQA schedule to the best of our team's ability, considerable initial efforts were made
by the team to identify potential drainage concepts and locations based on currently available information.
These initial concepts as summarized in this Proposal can be further vetted with City staff at project initiation
in the attempt to determine the required CEQA study areas as quickly as possible in order to get the Technical
Studies initiated.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 40
THE "AVENUES" DRAINAGE AREA STUDY AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS DESIGN, PROJECT NO. Z10000
ID
Task Name
October 2020
24 2]
12 1 1
November 2020
21 24 2] 2 11 14
1] 2
Dxember 2020
2 2 2 2
11 14 1] 2 2 2
January 2021
2 1 4 ] 1 1 1 1 22
Febniary 2021
2 2 1 12 1
March 2021
1 21 24 2] 2 11 14
1] 2
2 2
2
April 202
1
1
PHASE 3A- PRELIM. ENGINEERING
Notice to Proceed (NTP)
2
Kick -off and Initial Collaboration
♦ 9/25
3
Meeting
MPD Review /Drainage
16 days
4
Study /Drainage Alternatives &
10/2
/23
Estimates - Initial Draft
Collaboration Meeting to Review
5
Alternatives with City Staff
MPD Review /Drainage
10/26
13 days
6
Study /Drainage Alternatives &
10/27 11/12
Estimates - Final
Utility Notification, Information
7
Request and Coordination
Initial Research, Base Mapping of
10/2
15 days
10/22
8
Property and Right -of -Way
10/8
10/28
Verification
days
9
Initial Field Survey Verifications
10/81-M,
10/9
10
Geotechnical Field Drilling &
Testing
Geotechnical Lab Testing, Analysis
10/8
1 10/14
20 days
11
& Report
Submittal of Drainage Alternatives
10/15
11/11
12
and Estimates
City Review, Collaboration on
11/13
5 days
13
Alternatives, Materials for CC
11/16
/20
Report, etc.
CC Report Preparation (By City
14
Staff)
City Council Approval
11/23
12/2
15
PHASE IB- CEQA DOCUMENTATION
12/8
16
Administrative Draft IS /MND and
42 days
17
Project Description
Biological Resources Assessment &
10/8
40 days
1
1 /7
18
Cultural Resources Study
City Review
1 0/8
12/3
10 days
19
12/8
12/21
20 days
20
Prepare and Distribute Draft
IS /MND, Notice of Intent /Notice of
12/22
1/19
Completion
Public / Agency Review
24 days
21
Administrative Final IS /MND &
1/20
2/22
10 days
22
MMRP
City Review
2/23 3/8
5 days
23
Final IS /MND & MMRP
3/9
3/15
5 days
24
Notice of Determination (NOD)
3/16
3/22
5 days
25
PHASE 2- FINAL ENGINEERING
13 days
3/23
3/
9
26
Initiate Geometric Drawing Base
27
Sheets
Design Topographical Survey
11/23
4days
12110
28
Pre- Design Meeting
11/23
11/26
29
12/10
8 days
30
Finalize Geometric Drawing Base
Sheets
12/11
& 12/22
10 days
31
1st Submittal - Geometic Drawing
Base Sheets
Preparation of Legals and Plats
12/23
1/6
35 days
32
Preparation of 65% Plans and Cost
12/11
35 days
1/29
33
Estimates
2nd Submittal - 65% Plans and
12/11
1/29
34
Estimates
City Review of 2nd Submittal 65%
J1/29
10 days
35
Plans and Estimates
Preparation of 95% Plans,
1/2 2/11
20 days
36
Estimates and Specs.
3rd Submittal - 95% PS &E
2/12
3/11
37
City Review of 3rd Submittal 95%
5 days
38
PS &E
Preparation of Final PS &E
3/15
19
7 days
Y
39
Final PS &E Submittal for CC
3/22
/30
40
Approval and Bid Advertisement
♦
/31
Page 1
F. NON - COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT FORM (RFP ATTACHMENT 3)
NON- COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT FORM
Most be executed by proposer and submitted with the proposal
Randal L. Streeter (name) hereby declare as follows;
I am President
(Title)
of _ Adams- Streeter Civil Engineers, _ Inc.
(Company)
the party making the foregoing proposal, that the proposal is not made in the interest
of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association,
organization, or corporation; that the proposal is genuine and not collusive or shorn;
that the proposer has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other proposer
to put in a false or sham proposal, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired,
connived, or agreed with any proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal, or that
anyone shall refrain from proposing; that the proposer has not in any manner, directly
or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix
the proposal price of the proposer or any other proposer, or to fix any overhead, profit,
or cost element of the proposal price, or of that of any other proposer, or to secure any
advantage against the public body awarding the agreement of anyone interested in the
proposed agreement; that tall statements contained in the proposal are true; and,
further, that the proposer has not, directly r indirectly, submitted his or her proposal
price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or
data relative hereto, or paid, and wit! not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership,
company, association, organization, proposal depository, or to any member or agent
thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham proposal.
I declare under penalty of penury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true arld Corr
Proposer Signature:
Proposer Dame: _ Randal . Streeter
Proposer Title: PreSident
Company Name: Adams Streeter Civil Engineers, Inc.
Address: 16755 Von Darman Avenue, Suite 150, Irvine, CA 92606
2
RFP- The Avenues
dra inage Area Study and Drainage Improvement Design
City of Lake Elsinore
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 42
G. FORM OF AGREEMENT
ASCE concurs with the terms of the RFP and Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with certain exceptions to
the indemnification clauses as it applies to the California Civil Code Section 2782.8, as shown below.
Modifications to the clauses shown are provided as suggestions for the City's consideration as we understand
that the City does not ordinarily allow modifications to the standard agreement when contracting for services
from outside firms. ASCE also understands that any language modifications and /or waivers to certain
exceptions, if allowed, will be subject to the City Attorney's determination and approval.
15. Indemnity. In accordance with Civil Code 2782.8, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold
harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against a-Ry
d all losses, liability, claims, suits, actions, damages, and causes of action arising out of any personal
injury, bodily injury, loss of life, or damage to property, or any violation of any federal, state, or municipal
law or ordinance, to the extent caused by and only in direct proportion to Consultant's negligence, in
whole OF in part, by the willful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of Consultant or its employees,
subcontractors, or agents, by acts for which they could be held strictly liable, or by the quality or
character of their work. The foregoing obligation of Consultant shall not apply when (1) the injury, loss
of life, damage to property, or violation of law arises from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of
the City or its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers and (2) the actions of Consultant or its
employees, subcontractor, or agents have contributed in no part to the injury, loss of life, damage to
property, or violation of law. It is- WRderstee ! that the duty y "f i'GR6 11ta Rt W iR domnify aR d hold harmless-
0 RGlu des the d6ity to ldefeR d as set forth OR SeGtiGR 2778 of the GalifGFRia Gi.ail Ge de. Acceptance by
City of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve
Consultant from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and
hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance
policies shall have been determined to apply, but only in direct proportion to Consultant's negligence.
By execution of this Agreement, Consultant acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section
and that it is a material element of consideration.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 43
APPENDIX
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 44
E. RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL
Title
President i Principaldn- Charge
Experience
43 YeafS
Education
Bachelor of Science in Civil
Engineering, University of California
Long Beach (1971)
Randal L. Streeter, PE
Experience Summary: Mr. Streeter is President and Principal -in- Charge of Adams Streeter Civil
Engineers- His over 43 years of experience covers all aspects of civil engineering design including
land planning, due diligence, governmenta9 processing and engineering design encompassing
site grading, roadway, sewer, water and storm drain improvements. Mr. Streeter has managed
numerous projects ranging from CityfCounty public works improvements to land development
projects that encompasses roadways, utility infrastructure, parks and recreational facilities, low -
income housing, master planned residential communities and subdivisions, office and industrial
parks, schools, and commerciallretail shopping centers. He is also a member of the American
Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), the Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of California
(CELSOC) and the Orange County Chapter of the Building Industry Association (BIA)- His
background includes, but is not limited to the following'.
Public Works Improvements: Public facilities including streets, parkways, parking lots,
retaining walls, underground utilities (storm drain, sewer, water), public parks and recreational
facilities, trails, and other facilities.
. Community and Housing Development: Master - planned communities, single - family
residential, high - density residential (apartments and condominiums), infill redevelopments,
university campus housing and recreational facilities involving due diligence, entitlements,
plotting and layout studies, cost analysis, dry and wet utility relocations, site grading and
earthwork, underground infrastructure design (storm drain, sewer, water), community packs and
recreational facilities.
Registration
Registered Civil Eng . Commercial and Industrial Development: Mixed -use business centers, offices, libraries,
ineer, California
R.C.E. 25083 {1975] retail and shopping centers, hotels, restaurants, warehouses, aerospace complex and other
Registered Civil Engineer, Arizona facilitles involving plotting, layout studies and traffic circulation, cost analysis, dry and wet utility
R.C.E. 25846 (1992) relocations, surface and underground infrastructure improvements, site grading and earthwork.
HIGHLIGHTED PROJECTS
q.?
UNIVERSITY HILLS COMMUNITY CENTER
IRVINE CAMPUS HOUSING AUTHORITY (ICHA)
The University Hills Community Center located within the
campus of the University of California, Irvine is one of many
recreational amenities developed by the Irvine Campus
Housing Authority for faculty and residents to enjoy- This
facility includes ICHA's offices, rooms for events and
activities, a social center, media room, fireplace, a courtyard
with outdoor seating, open turf areas, and a facility parking
lot- Design of the facility were performed in coordination with
Leason Pomeroy, one of Orange County's leading architects
to realize ICHA's vision in serving the University Hills
community. Final engineering plans encompass site layout,
grading, street, parking lot, and utility infrastructure
improvements (sewer, water and storm drain). Construction
staking for building foundations, site grading, hardscape,
roadway, underground utilities, and architectural features
were also performed in support of project construction.
CORONA DEL MAR PLAZA AND RETAIL CENTER
THE IRVINE COMPANY
The Corona del Mar Plaza is located off Pacific Coast Highway
and MacArthur Boulevard in the seaside community of Corona
del Mar. Mediterranean architecture sets the scene for stores
and restaurants such as Tommy Bahama's Island Grille,
Bristol Farms, Gulfstream, Whole Foods, Sprinkles Cupcakes,
Chico's, and others. Preliminary engineering and entitlement
documents including off -site master -plan dra €nape studies for
the project was initially prepared, and followed by final
engineering plans to support site grading and the construction
of streets, parking lots, and utility infrastructure (sewer, water
and storm drain). Public improvements include the widening
of MacArthur Boulevard and extensive improvements to an
off -site regional storm drain system to accommodate drainage
from the Corona del Mar Plaza, Fashion Island and Newport
Center developments.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 45
Khoon Y. Tan, PE, QSD /P
Experience Summary: A seasoned professional with extensive and rounded experience in the
civil engineering profession and construction industry, encompassing practice in both private and
public sectors- Mr_ Tan possess practical 2nd hands -on knowledge in programming, management
and administration of municipal Capital Improvement Programs and Projects, and adapt in civil
engineering design, project management and construction management. A demonstrated leader
in managing projects and directing of staff and design teams for successful and ti mely completion
of projects. His broad background includes, but is not limited to:
* Public Works and Utilities Engineering: Planning, administration, engineering design and
management of projects related to new and existing public and private facilities involving the
improvement of arteriaiflocal streets and parkways, open space, parks, trails and recreational
facilities, residential lcommerclallindustrial facilities, storm drainage and water quality facilities,
sanitary sewer, and domestic and recycle water facilities.
• Municipal Engineering: Planning, administration and management of City Capital
Title Improvement Programs (CI Ps) necessary for the implementation and funding of Public Works
Director of Municipal Services & and Community Services related projects requiring programs administration, programming,
Senior Project Manager infrastructure assessments, funding determination, project management, grant administration,
Years of Experience public process (council, commissions, outreach and workshops), engineering design, project
32 and contract administration, construction bid administration, construction management and
inspection.
Education % Development Engineering- Residential, commercial, industrial and other site development
Bachelor of Science in Civil projects involving due diligence, entitlements, planning, layout studies, cost analysis and
Engineering, Oklahoma State
University Stillwater, ptClahoma technical design involving traffic, transportation, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, domestic and
recycled water, site grading and earthwork, hydrology and hydraulic analysis, water quality
Registration determination, site inspections and certification, utility relocations and plan checking.
Registered Civil Engineer, California Transportation and Traffic Engineering: Transportation facilities for public and private
R.C.E. 80731
Qualified SWPPP Developer) entities related to interstate, highway, corridor, interchange and intersection improvements,
Practitioner (QSDIQSP) signalization and ramp metering, traffic signing, striping and channelization improvements,
Cartificate No. 20882 stage construction and traffic control. traffic studies, capacity and progression analysis.
HIGHLIGHTED PROJECTS
VERDUGO STREET BEAUTIFICATION PRGJECT
CITY OF SAN JUAN CAfsfSTRANO
The Verdugo Street Beautification Project provides an inviting
street corridor that creates a sense of arrival for visitors arriving
by train, as well as those parking and walking to restaurants, the
movie theatre and shops downtown. The project site is located
in the heart of the City's Historic Town Center by the San Juan
Capistrano Ivietrelink train depot and east of the historic Los
Ries district. The City's vision for this popular downtown
destination was realized through a reduced width streetscape
and widened sidewalks for a pedestrian focused experience that
allows for sidewalk dining and temporary street closures during
special events. Streetscape enhancements include rolled curbs,
decorative sidewalk pavers, crosswalk pavers with color hand
accents, street bulb -outs, street trees, planter pots, planters,
bollards, enhanced street lights, bistro lightingr and street
furniture. Enhancements at the plaza area by the Metrolink train
depot includes a shade structure, seating, planters, plaza clock,
and various Metrolink safety improvements with provisions for a
future digital information display board.
PHILLIP S. PAXTON EQUESTRIAN CENTER I
CITY OF YORBA LINDA
Phillip Paxton Equestrian Center resides within an existing flood
facility (Yorba Linda Reservoir) owned by the Orange County
Flood Control District (DCFCD) through an existing Rights Lease
Agreement with the City of Yorba Linda- An In itial site evaluation
was performed to determine the feasibility of proposed facility
improvements which include a site topographic survey,
preliminary grading study, and an alignment f turning movement
study to convert an existing pedestrian ramp ! walkway connecting
the lower and upper parking lot areas into a vehicular ramp for
equestrian trailers- Final construction plans, special provisions
and cast estimates were provided as part of the bid documents to
facilitate the construction of the vehicular ramp, equestrian arena
expansion, driveway widening including retaining walls, drainage
modifications, and conversion of a ramped dirt trail leading to the
equestrian arena into a ramped paved roadway in conjunction
with hardscape, landscape and irrigation modification plans by the
project landscape architect.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 46
Title
Senior Project Manager
Experience
35 Years
Education
Bachelor of Science in Civil
Engineering, University of California,
Irvine
Registration
Registered Civil Engineer, California
R.C.E- 426155
Mohammad M. Abadi, RE
Experience Summary: A seasoned civil engineering professional with extensive project
management and engineering design experience that ensures a thorough analysis of project
parameters, design options and ramifications. Mr_ AW6 has been providing outstanding service
to public agencies and private entities for over thirty -five years. Throughout his tenure at Adams
Street since 1988, Mr. Abadi has designed and supervised a wide variety of projects 1n the SoCal
region ranging from public works to private development projects, and has specific expertise in
the area of drainage, hydrology, hydraulics and water quality in support of the Various englneering
design projects. His background includes, but is not limited to the following:
+
Public Warks and Utilities Engineering: Management and design of projects related to public
facilities such as streets, parking lots, retaining walls, storm drainage and water quality, sanitary
sewer, domestic and recycle water facilities, public parks, trails, recreational and other facilgies.
Community and Housing Development: Planning, management and design of master
planned communities, single family residential, high - density residential (apartments and
condominiums }, infill redevelopments, university campus housing and recreational facilities
involving due diligence, entitlements, plotting and layout studies, cost analysis, dry and wet
utility relocations, underground infrastructure design (storm drainage, sanitary sewer, domestic,
recycled and frre water), design of parks and recreational facilities, site grading and earthwork
site inspections and certifications.
• Commercial and Industrial development: Site development (new and infills) and design of
mixed -use business centers, offices, libraries, retail and shopping centers, hotels, restaurants,
warehouses, aerospace complex and other related facilities Involving plotting, layout studies
and traffic circulation, cost analysis, dry and wet utility relocations, surface and underground
infrastructure improvements, site grading and earthwork, inspections and certifications.
HIGHLIGHTED PROJECTS
GLASSELL CAMPUS LfD RETROFIT PROJECT I
ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS
A Proposition 84 grant funded project that showcases the
transformation of an existing 9.4 -acre industriallcommercial
site into a state -of -the -art MS4 compliant stormwater
capture, treatment, outreach and research center located on
Glassell Street and Bristol Lane in the City of Orange. The
project restored the pre - development hydrologic conditions
by constructing various LID BMPs such as porous asphalt,
porous concrete, porous pavers, bio- remediation swales and
planters, media filter, modular wetlands, above- ground
cistern and subterranean water storage structures. The
project also required extensive re- construction of the
existing parking lots and the County's paved maintenance
yard facility. The project received two achievement awards,
one from the American Public Works Association (APWA)
and the other from the American Society of Civil Engineers
(ASCE).
THE BOEING COMPANY I HUNTINGTON BEACH, LONG
BEACH AND SEAL BEACH FACILITIES
A multitude of on -call projects since the 1990's to the present
for the Boeing Company involving facilities primarily at the
Huntington Beach and Long Beach locations, but including the
Seal Beach facility ranging from the redevelopment of the
industrial subdivision encompassing over 367 acres of
improvements for the McDonnell Center Business Park to
more recent projects to support the re- purposing and sale of
existing properties and facilities. Projects include site
planning, design of new parking lots, reconfiguration and
rehabilitation of parking lot, site grading, property development
and redevelopment, street improvements, utility infrastructure
improvements (sanitary sewer, sewer pump station, domestic
water, storm drainage), hydrology and hydraulic analysis,
survey/mapping (topographic surveys, constriction staking,
ALTA surveys, boundary surveys, parcel maps, and
easements).
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 47
Title
Director of Surveying
Craig Burney, PLS
EXPERIENCE SUMMARY:
A highly experienced survey manager and field surveyor with extensive experience in performing
a wide variety of surveys including for, but not limited to topographic surveys, ALTA surveys,
boundary surveys, aeriat surveys, GPS surreys, construction surveys and volume computation
surveys. Mr- Bumey is responsible for daily survey crew operations that includes work scheduling,
field crew cal cuIations, ma nag ementof equipment and material purchases, He is also responsible
for managing survey contracts, budgets, providing job cost estimations, acts as a liaison between
the surveying and engineering departments to ensure proper coordination of projects, and assist
the Dapping department with map exhibits, revisions and technical support. Mr- Burney possess
a strong knowledge and competency in Autodesk's Civil 3D and Land Development Desktop
software programs, including for integrated Leica and Trimble instrumentation with AutoCAD to
yield higher survey productivity, and performing coordinate geometry (COGO), digital terrain
modelling (DTM), and earthwork calculations. His background includes, but is not limited to the
fallowing:
Experience
• Public Works Facilities: Aerial targets, ground controls, site topographic J design surveys,
31 Years
boundary surveys, construction staking and verifications, right -*f -way surveys, ties and
monumentativn, base mapping and other related work to support engineering design and
Education
construction of public facilities and infrastructure improvements, including for streets, sewer,
Bachelor of Arts in Psychology,
water, storm drainage, buildings and structures, parks, open Space, trails, dry utilities, etc -
Califarnia State University, Long
Beach
GPS Cert ifcate Program, Unversi #y
Land Property Y Development- Land development related surveys for residential, commercial,
of California, Riverside
industrial and in -fill projects that commonly includes aerial targets, ground control, boundary
survey, subdivision survey, ALTA survey, site topographic f design surveys, construction
Registration
staking (mass grading, rough grading pads, precise grading, streets, storm drain, sewer, water,
Professional Land Surveyor,
etc.), grading certifications, monumentation, and grading earthwork quantity verifications.
California PLS 7732
HIGHLIGHTED PROJECTS
- Jrll�j
4C,
LAMBERT RANCH, ORCHARD HILLS DEVELOPMENT
FOR THE NEW HOME COMPANY
The Lambert Ranch 50 -acre master planned development in the
Portola springs area of Irvine boasts 369 classic architecture
single family residential homes with abundant gardens, parks
and landscaping through the incorporation of meaningful Feng
Shur principals. Lambert Ranch extends through three distinct
but connected neighborhoods that is thematically derive from
the historical Qrigins of the ranch. "The Field ", "The Grove" and
"The Hill ', The northern portion of the project named "The Hill'
features single loaded streets with manufactured slopes
between terraced building pads. This portion of the project is
substantially elevated above the rest of the project and has
unobstructed views of the ocean. The site features a community
recreation center with the amenities of a swimming pool, wading
pool, spa, and fountain. Integrated within the open space areas
are three pocket parks with landscape amenities, tot -lot with
playground equipment and restroom facilNes.
SKYRIDGE DEVELOPMENT AND EL TORO ROAD
WIDENING FOR CALATLANTtC HOMES
SKYRIDGE is a 28 -acre, 84 -lot residential development project
nestled in a hillside setting along the northerly boundaries of the
City of Mission Viejo- This hillside development offers a large
number of view lots with Saddleback Mountaln as an idyllic
backdrop, which was made possible by addressing sites
topographical and geological unique characteristics, and through
efficient grading operations. The SKYRIDGE development was
also performed in conjunction with the widening of the El Toro
Road arterial from Glen Ranch Road to beyond Cielo Entrada as
part of off -site roadway improvements that includes pavement
grinding and overlay, curb & gutter and sidewalk construction,
reconfiguration of pavement delineation, and miscellaneous
parkway improvements.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 48
AS
Title
Mapping ❑irector
Experience
37 Years
Education
Rancho Santiago College
County of Orange, California.
Anna Martinez
Experience Summary: Ms. Martinez has been a mapping professional working in the civil
engineering field for over thirty -seven years. She has broad mapping experience
encompassing projects in various Southern California counties including Orange, Los
Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside, San Diego and Ventura and excels In performing
records and title research, boundary analysis, title report due - diligence, and preparing lot
line adjustments, easement exhibits, legal descriptions, Record of Surveys, A.L,T.A,
surveys, final parcel maps and tract maps. She also has excellent skills in coordinating and
processing mapping related documents with local counties, cities, state agencies, utility
companies and title companies- Ms- Martinez continually keeps Current with the mapping
industry and attends seminars through Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors of California
(CELSOC) for Subdivision Map Act updates. She is currently serving as the firm's Mapping
director and works closely with the surveyors and engineers in performing various mapping
analysis and preparing mapping and legal documents. Her background includes, but is not
limited to the following-
Public Works improvements: Title and records research, boundary analysis, base
mapping, right -of -way & easements verification and exhlbits, legal descriptions, base
mapping, lot line adjustments, ALTA maps and other related work to support engineering
design for construction of public facilities and infrastructure improvements.
Land Property Development: Title and records research, entitlements, boundary and
property analysis, subdivision mapping, right -of -way 1 easements verification and exhibits,
legal descriptions. base mapping, lot line adjustments, street and property
rnonumentation, ALTA. maps, parcel maps, tract maps, flnal maps and other related work
to support residential, commercial and industrial related developments.
HIGHLIGHTED PROJECTS
TRI- POINTE HOMES AT ESENCIA, PLANNING AREA
2.2 1 TRI- POINTS HOMES I RANCHO MISSION VIEJO
COMPANY
Adams Streeter assisted the Rancho Mission Viejo
Company in providing engineering design for sanitary
sewer, domestic water and storm drain improvements for
this 72 -lot hillside single family residential development
located at the MR24 site within Planning Area 2.2.
Adams Streeter was involved in the design and
construction of five (5) tracts within this planning area that
consisted of a total of fifteen (15) separate tracts. New
infrastructure includes streets, domestic water, reclaimed
water, sanitary sewer, storm drain facilities, rough and
precise grading. Sewer and water plans were designed
in accordance with Santa Margarita Water District
(SMWE)) standards and specifications. This project was
designed and approved in early 2018. Project
construction commenced in late 2018 and was completed
recently, in late 2019.
FACULTY HOUSING AT UNIVERSITY HILLS,
PLANNING AREA 11 -1 1 IRVINE CAMPUS HOUSING
AUTHORITY
Adams Streeter assisted the Irvine Campus Housing
Authority (ICHA) in providing engineering design for
sanitary sewer and water improvements for Phase 1 of 5
phases of the faculty housing at University Hills Planning
Area 11 -1, a residential development situated in Irvine at
the northwest corner of Bonita Canyon Drive and Shady
Canyon Drive. The Irvine Campus Housing Authority
essentially functions as their awn "municipality" which
builds and maintains their own infrastructure- This
particular phase connected two other neighborhoods of
multi - family residential phases; one to the south and one to
the west. The northerly phases continued to be single
family residential. In addition to water improvement plans,
Adams Streeter also provided the design for a recycled
water system for irrigation and the water system
connection to the community pool for this 50 -lot
neighborhood. This project was designed and approved in
late 2417_ Constructlon commenced in early 2018 and was
completed the same year
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 49
KARLOS MARKOUIZDSr RCEr PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
Mr. Markouizos has over 30 years of engineering and management experience on
numerous public works, residential and commercial projects in Southern California.
His has worked with the County of Orange, County of Riverside, and other local
county and city agencies and utility companies. He has considerable experience with
field exploration and monitoring, field and laboratory soil testing, grading and
earthwork, slope stability analysis, design of shallow and deep foundations,
liquefaction and settlement analysis, structural pavement design, and flood control
and utility improvements.
Prior projects include the development of hillside and flatland Sites up to 4,000 acres;
infrastructure projects have included main arterialsfstate highways, vehicular bridges
and pedestrian bridges; and drainage projects have included large buried and above
ground tanks, channel improvements, basin construction, and cistern construction.
Some special design aspects of projects by Mr. Markouizos have included design
support of temporary and permanent shoring for large excavations, retaining walls,
bridges and parking structures. Representative projects on which Mr. Markouizos has
worked include-
Education
California State university, Lang Beach,
Long Reach, California
B.S. Civil Engineering
Carnegie - Mellor] University, Pittsburgh.
Pennsylvania
Graduate Study Civil Engineering
Summerly Recycled Waterline, Lake Elsinore: Field exploration, soil testing, design Registrations
and construction services for a 30 -inch waterline for the Elsinore Valley Municipal Civil Engineer— Cal ifornis
Water District. The new line extended over 5,000 linear feet and included a crossing License # RCE 50312
under the San Jacinto River which required 35- to 50 -foot deep jack and bore pits.
Excavations and dewatering during construction showed very permeable sail conditions. Professional Atfltta #Ions
City of Corona /Corporate Yard Infiltration Ponds: City on -call improvement project American Society of Civil Engineers ASCE
consisting of geotechnical explorati on and infiltration study within an existing 3.4 -acre California Gcotechnical Engineers'
Association
infiltration pond. NMG provider] geotechnical review and field percolation testing to International Society of Soil iviechanice. and
evaluate soil layers below the basin. Percolation testing was performed at depths betwoen Foundation Engineering
5 and 20 feet to assist in design ofbasin reconfiguration and grading to achieve increased Epsilon, National Honor Society
infiltration performance.
Veterans Park Storm Water Diversion and Infiltration. Redondo Beach: Field
exploration including borings and in -situ percolation testing for proposed stone drain
improvements and a network of subterranean infiltration galleries. The exploration
involved city encroachment permitting and exploration and testing within an
active /existing public park. Percolation testing was governed by County of Los Angeles
Guidelines. The project included a feasibility study and development of a design
infiltration rates.
Tustin Legacy, City of Tustin, California
Geotechnical investigation, review of grading and improvement plans, including design
for replacement of an earthen channel with a concrete box structure along Barranca
Parkway (Van Karman Ave to Redhill Ave). Geotechnical services include evaluation
of roughly two million cubic yards of import material, observation of demolition of pre-
existing utilities, evaluation of soft alluvial deposits, shallow groundwater conditions,
design of embankment surcharge and settlement monitoring. street and utility
construction.
N M G
Geotechnical, Inc.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 50
*4WECORP Consulting, inc,
ENVIRONMENTAL CDNSLILTANTS
Thomas Holm, AICP
Senior Environmental Planner /Projecf Manager
Mr, Holm offers over 38 years of diverse group management and environmental planning experience on a variety of
environmental, natural resource and regulatory compliance projects. Tie has been actively involved in broad -based
NEPA and CEQA- related projects throughout Southern and Central California including transportation corridors and
highways, water resources projects, major public works and infrastructure, and master - planned communities.
Education
M.A., Urban and Regional Planning, University of California, Los Angeles
B.A., Political Science, University of California, Trvine
Registrations, Certifications, Permits and Affiliations
* American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP)
e Board Member, Natural History Foundation of Orange County
* Former Planning and Transportation Commissioner, City of Mission Viejo
Professional Experience
The Preserve Masser Plan Program, Chino. Mr. Dolan served as project director for City of Chino Master Plan program
for 5.400 acres formerly in the Chino Malley Dairy Preserve and San Bernardino Agricultural Preserve.
Prado Bum C nsMK ed Wetlands EA -0range C unty WKer District. Project Manager_ Mr. Holm prepared ISJIsA
leading to 1b NDlFQNSI for 43 -acre system of natural channels diverting and treating Santa Ana River flows to remove
nitrates in conformance with basin water quality and habitat enhancement objectives.
As Needed EnvironmenW Services —South Coast Water District. Orange County. Project Director. Mr. Holm
supervised as- needed environmental consulting services projects including CEQA documentation, surveys and
permitting for the district. CEQA projects included San Juan Creek Property Facilities Master Plan Program EIR and
Groundwater Recovery Facility.
On Call Environmental Services Lw ,Angeles Department of Water and Power. Project Director. Mr. Holm
coordinated technical studies and an Initial Study/Environmental Assessment (ISIEA) for LADWP's proposed facility
improvements at its Van Norman Complex (VNC) in the north San Fernando Valley.
Laguna Canyon to PCH Storm Drain Alternatives EIR —City of Laguna Beach. Project Manager. Mr. Holm prepared
programmatic EIR evaluating three alternative alignments for construction of a triple 9'x9' RCB storm drain under
City streets through downtown Laguna Beach to the Pacific Ocean.
Urban Runoff Management Plan, Orange Cauaty. Resources Planner. Performed resources inventory, baseline
studies and preliminary environmental assessment to support conceptual design and location of creek protection and
enhancement features for Aliso Creek and Wwd Canyon drainages.
16755 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 150, IRVINE, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 ADAMS- STREETER.COM Page 51
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY
IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOWN. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT -SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES.
J�
Pg 13
Pg 17
Pg 29
O�
G a 30
moo.
ti c
P.
60
15
ASSESSOR'S MAP BK373 PG.17
Riverside County, Calif.
Pg 33
Y
arrodrig
POR. W 1/2, SEC. 8, T.6S., RAW.
/
1"5 yl 39.08 50
R
i / 511Q 17 15 13
M
/ 6316
a5 1
O � N
3 2
N � �
J 6y^
N88- 25 -30E
MILL
N
11 1 9 1 7 1 5
TRA 005 -017
005 -043
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
STREET -
50
25'
3 1 2 F-
M W
- ' ,1Q2 � 02 � 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 OW`C
592800 01
19.33 00 O r
N 50 1 U)
50 50
' 11Q2$ m 172
� 133
•`A. N 23 22 20 18 16 14
VV
8318 N 50.00 50.00 m
C!� 25 24
26 0 o 34 0 22 21 20 19 18 17
15o6Q 27 26 25 50
/ 131.81 50 1 0
o N88- 25 -30E
ACACIA
N
RANCHp---J__
LAKESHoRE
LA —Z.—
N80- 16 -OOW
Map Reference
MB 11/21 COUNTRY CLUB HEIGHTS UNff 2
H-
83.32 15
0 21 24
W87.80
22 23 °
O M
°
11
05
90.77
''�
CO
° 23 22- 93.74
30' 30'
24 96.71
20
20
25 21 99.68
w
Z
v
160 50 50
I
i
12 10 8 6 4 2 M M
I M
1 �6 27 14 13 28 =
b6
50 32 `tip I
373 -17
17 -18
N
W E
S
1 " = 100 '
Legend
Lot Lines
Right -Of -Way
Old Lot Lines
Reference R.O.W
• - - - Other Easements
• • • • • Lease Area
Subdivision Tic Mark
50 50 _ —
`n — rn
O N _
STREET °
N
50
19
01
17
02
15
03
13
04
11
05
9
06
7
07
5
08
3
09
50
1
10
20
20
18
19
16
18
14
17
12
16
10
15
8
14
6
13
4
12
2
25
50
7,8
9/11/1985 176 -12
176 -21,22
25
50
37 A2
`
N
STREET
N
F�330
60
19 18
30
17
30
16
60
15 14
15
13
75 30
12 11 10 9
10 09
30
8 7
08 07
60
6 I 5
2,0
30 30
4 3 2 1
04 03 02 01
60
30
30
60
15
75 30
30
60
30 30i
LLDate Old Number New Number
4/11/1979 176 - 918,18 19
7/1/1979 174 -11 25,ST
1211/1980 172 -15 27,ST
411/1981 173 -3
12
411/1981 1734
13
411/1981 173 -5
14
12/1/1982 176 -5,6
20
1/1/1984 1714
7,8
9/11/1985 176 -12
176 -21,22
25
1/1/1986 176 -11,21
23
1/1/1986 176 -23
24,25
C.C.H.2 —
2/1/1986 172 -12
28,ST
9/11/1986 15,16
176 -27
�!
3/1/1990 1,ST
171 -9
4/2/2012 173 -8,9
15
12/28/2017 172 -23
29,30
12128/2017 172 -24
31,32
12/28/2017 172-29,31
33
Feb 2018
12/28/20 7 172 -30,32
34
_
gage 52
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY
IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOWN. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT -SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES.
` SEC. 8 T.6S, RAW
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
50 I 50 75 1 75
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 1 17 19 21 1 3 1 25
I
m 17 14 15 16 18 19 07 113 10 111 112 M
BLK 1 1181 1 1
50 i 50 751 75
CCH1 — — — — — °—
ACACIA ST.
CCH6 °
40 40 47.84 47.85
77 1 m 5 6 7 8 9 I 10 11 1 12 13 14 15 16 17
32° 40 41 39 38 Q9 13 14 15 16 17 u
25 2 Z
° 33 w
30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 Q
o 3760 s —" 10 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 N
N 4 47.85
0 15 47.84
769 40 40
0
LAKE ST. °
- N
30 ° 60 30 30 3 40.03 40.03
31 32 1 33 34 1 35 36 1 37 38 1 39 1 40 41 1 2 1 43 44 1 45 46 47 148 49 50 51
n
42 IP 50 58 m 157 0 52 53 ® m 1 47 A. 21
c 01
I I I I I I I
30 60 30.01 30 30.01 30 30.01 30 30.01 1 30 30 30.01 1 30 30.01 30 1 30.01 I 30 40.03 39.70
- PARK WAY CCH61 EHI
543.23 155 ML 50 1 50 ML
185
23
rn
125
° 17 13
124.50
16
15 14
20 14
17 9 1
124.50
13 15
125
10 12
71111976
125
11 16
124.50 10
19
9 1
3 18 8
124.50
125
07 6
° 7
125
125
50
14,ST
50
0
1
2
3
N
4 5
° 04
°
05 0
01
02
03 �
50
1/1/1979
183 -8
18,ST
50
59.82 1 50 1 50 1 86
125
30.50 30 N 21 17
° 15
14
30
30.50
N
D
Z
Q
30 30
73
TRA 005 -017
005 -043
I
117.50 16
37.50
14
117.50
125 12 (�
° 13
15
10 N
16 11
10
09
17 9 1
4 og 8
181 -8,9
125
D
W
a
30
18 7 19 6 137.50
125 117.50
50 50 100 1
° 013
1 2 3
o � I
01 02 03 0 04 05 o i
30
50 50 50
50
50 1 60.68
EHI
11 ;zs). �ss� 3�I,I !�s
Iq
50
e M
F j
SCR.
C} CNI } CLr�
Data
ASSESSOR'S MAP BK373 PG. 18 jasantos RS 77/78
Riverside County, Calif.
Pg 11
Pg 17 Pg 19
Pg 18
Pg 20
Pg 27
Pg 26
50 1 39.32
259.30
36
g
�I
...........
Map Reference
MB 12/62 ELSINORE HEIGHTS TR UNIT NO 1
MB 11/18 COUNTRY CLUB HEIGHTS UNIT NO 1
MB 12/68 COUNTRY CLUB HEIGHTS UNIT NO 6
MB 6/296 SD ELSINORE RESUB. BILK D Jan 2016
373 -18
17 -19
N
W E
S
1 " = 100 '
Legend
Lot Lines
Right -Of -Way
- — - Old Lot Lines
- — - Reference R.O.W
- - - - • Other Easements
• • • • Lease Area
Subdivision Tic Mark
Date
Old Number New Number
11111974
185 -27
185 -40,ST
61111975
181 -8,9
181 -13
71111976
182 -5,6
182 -30
8/l/1976
182 -2,3
185 -41
111/1977
181 -1
1 -7,ST
1/1/1977
181 -2
14,ST
1/1/1977
181 -3
15,ST
111 /1977
181 -4
16,ST
10/111977
185 -17 -19
43 -45,ST
11/1/1977
184 -07
19,ST
1/1/1979
183 -8
18,ST
1/1/1979
183 -9
195T
1/1/1979
183 -11
20,ST
111/1979
183 -12
21,ST
411/1979
185 -39
46
211/1980
185 -43,45
47
311/1980
182 -11,12
31
411/1980
185 -31,32
48
811/1980
182 -2
33,ST
811 /1980
182 -1
32,ST
111/1981
184 -12
20,ST
101111981
181 -5
18,ST
101111981
181 -6
19,ST
411/1984
185 -14.15
49
411/1985
182 -7,8
34
111/1986
185 -11,13
51
111/1986
185 -4,5
50
111/1986
51
52,53
61111988
182 -3,4
182 -5
91111989
182 -35
36,ST
31111990
182 -36
37,ST
911/1990
182 -34
38,39
311/1991
182 -30
40,41
12/111993
184 -13
21,ST
411/1998
373 -48
55,56
11/2/2007
185 -8 -10
185 -57
312612009
184 -11
22,ST
919/2010
185 -67
58
if
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY
IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOWN, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT -SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES.
0
0
m
101
ASSESSOR'S MAP BK373 PG.20
Riverside County, Calif.
Riia U1 14u11d iiTn
DATA: RS 83/9, LLA 90 -4
26
SEC.8 TAS. ,RAW
CITY nF SAKE rlQINORl:
19
PARK WY
N89- 26-43E
25 12!
a
m
o•
V
V
J
Q
N
LOT D,q AYES
NofrrH 3
'� 1.. '-4-0
f ♦
f / f
S
50 50
Q
e
0
0
m
0
N 5p•OO
N COTE
�—� ST
RO. LA L' q
25
(:23
MB 14/28 PEPPER GROVE TRACT
MB 16/46 BRADY TRACT
MB 346/17 -79 AMENDED PEPPER GROVE TRACT
0
0
f
373 -20
R. A. 005 -043 17_21
005 -017
1/4 1
+COQ
I �NGLE =YOGI
?? e)
o
N
N
O
,p Z
N
363
13
DATE1
OLD NUMBER
INEW NUMBER
8177
101 -11
10,21
DATE1
OLD NUMBER
INEW NUMBER
0117
101 -14
1 22,ST
4119
205 -1
1
4/80
204 -1.2
204 -3
1/84
203 -1
2 -14
1/84
204 -3
, 4 -12
6/84
2 -14
203 -15
6 84
4-12
1 104-13
8/85
201 -16,20
1 13
2/85
205 -1
1 3,4
)4/861
AddAsrml
1 205-5
DATEI
OLD NUMBER I
NEW NUMBER
9/90
203 -15 1
16,17
9/90
205 -3 1
6,1
9/90
204 -13 1
205 -9
9/90
203 -16 1
205 -10
9/90
203 -17 1
205 -11
1103
205 -10
14 -19
7103
205 -9
30 -46
4/04
205 - 11,14 -46
47
4/04
205 -41
8- 56,206 -1 -6
4/04
105 -47
207 -1 -14
Apr 2004
R,:n Page 54
if
THI MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMtNT PUR OSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY
IS SSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOWN. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
MAYINOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT -SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES.
10V 110 2005
1
I
I
1
I
I
4 I PARK
66R _
al
r
PAR 20 M.RO
SBE 804 -33 -33 G
PU
436.96
A IF
I DATA: DEED 7479 11 722 $B 12/95
IRS DEED PLAT RAINA'D CANYON RD 3OX
SBE 804- 33 -33A
STATE MY 77 (709A & 711131
12 82 FRONTAGE RD
IS ENT TO CITY STATE WY
-110 SEE A FILE)
15 ) EX
WAY
0
0
0
ti
i
33
22
\
11 Q
@2
' ASSESSOR'S MAP BK. 363 PG. 13
Riverside County, Calif.
4 ail
P "s
d r S i _T ( BkAk x.47
la
m
!D
m
a
SEC.9 T.6S:,R.4W
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
(10
14.55 -
PAR 3
S
Q
a
10.00 AC ML M \
/ ti qG
Q
/ obQ
408.04
/
/
87 /
6.34 AC ML /
DATE
OLD NUMBER
NEW NUMBER
2 87
43
56,PG.14
2/87
PG.14
57
2/871
41,57
58
3/871
57,58
59
2/881
1
14
1 60 I
6/921
2,47
61-62
16/92
12,31,61
63
06/92
63
64 -65
93
45,62
66
M2
2 93'
661
67 -68
m
/
mom/
to
n
O
m
LO
C')
N
W
wa
DATEI
OLD NUMBER
NEW NUMBER
4/931
68,51
69
6J93.
PC, 10.
7n
6 98
67
71 -73
b 98
26
74 -75
6 98
49
I 76 I
6 98
PG.17
77
9/05
64
81,82
9 05
65
83 -85
9/05
25,70,61,83 1
8b
_ 9/051
82,841
87 1
85
6.03 AC ML
GOVT. LOT 2
.10,
e0
u.
V �
V
Q
0
Q �
� m
� o
0 0
11 N
A POR PAR 2
78
^
TRA
005 -b27
005417
005 -�A3
nn5_nog
VV uLv
005 -616
I
I
I
I
1
I
�I
\ \
S \
74 \ 75
\ \
2s
PO
PR2 \
363 -13
lI'2['
19 -41 —t
Ab
PAR 1 73 R 3
80 76
2.15 AC
MB 6/308 SD HEALD' S 1ST ADD} TO ELS I NORE
PM 111/96 -91 PARCEL MAP NO. 4890
PM 191/49 -50 PARCEL MAP NO. 28112
S
i" = 200'
ANGLE = 0
DATE1 OLD NUMBER
NEW NUMBER
M/7 *7 —
— —9
11791 901 1 10
1/791 906; 11
1/791 907
1 12
1/791 9081
13
)11791 10
1 14 -16
7/82; 11
' 17 -18
7/82; PC.10
1 19 -20
DATE' OLD NUMBER
I NEW NUMBER
7/82i 5
1 21 -22
2/821 ADD- ASMNT.
1 23 1
G , AAnnrtASyur
I--
7/831 ADD -ASWT.
i 2d I
1 25 -27
7/831
27
1 28 -29
8/83
1 F . WY
30
8/83i 181
31 -321
0/831 20
1 33 -34 i
0/83; 221
35 -37
0/631 23 1
38 -40 '
DATEI
OLD NUMBER I
NEW HUMBER
4/841
34,37,38 1
41
14/841
36,39
42
4/84'
33,35.40.
43
4184
29, PC. 17 I
44
1/84
4
45 -46
1184
9
47 -48
1184
28
49 -50
1/85
46,48,50 I
51
4/86
ADD- ASSMNT1
52,53
P9/861
11 1
54 -55
SW COR. LOT 7 BLK 7
MB 8/308SD
2�
z� '\
O
4
1.06 AC
77
Oct 2005
�D7
........ ...-- - ----------- --Rage -55 - - -
.
5
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY
IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOWN. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT -SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES.
36 N 70.10 91,24 84.32 55 5
o Fea
F`AGS1 -A'
S89- 51 -30W
NE 1/4 SEC. 8 T.6S, RAW
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
_ _ — — _ — — — — 5'' N
MILL
L N _ i _ — — — = 50 51.6 33.95
50 50 50 22.5
U) " M 115 •�•
25 � � M
Z
_ 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 M W
M
99 14 15 05 16 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 Q
50 50 51.21
IASSESSOR'S MAP BK373 PG. 11
Riverside County, Calif.
Data
RS 83/29
LLA 02 -13
Wawa Sahi
N
BLVD
N
125
0 02 23
125
22 03 N
01 21
- CI-1
20 04
19
125
18 05 0
1 12
Map Reference
MB 12/62 ELSINORE HEIGHTS TRACT UNIT NO.1
MB 12/30 COUNTRY CLUB HEIGHTS UNIT NO.4
MB 11/18 COUNTRY CLUB HEIGHTS UNIT NO.1
TRA 005 -043
l
198.02 34.12 N
1 z5
2p3� N 2S
rn
12 11 9� W E
10 °'
M
�qY n S
1 " = 100 '
L
Legend
Lot Lines
Right -Of -Way
- — - Old Lot Lines
Reference R.O.W
• - - - Other Easements
• Lease Area
Subdivision Tic Mark
373 -11
17 -19 I
C °
z
Pg 10
Pg 12 Pg 09
Bk 373
Pg 11
Pg 17 Pg 19
Pg 18
2
S
50
°V—
Date
Old Number New Number
J
106.29
— — —
-
711/1974
112 -34,44 45 /
N
5 _
111111977
117 -06 07,ST /
�-
111111977
114 -25 28,ST - -
,5
uw
1/111979
112-41 46,ST
29.5
125
— — — . — — — , -
102.5 ��
7/1/1979
114 -18 29,ST
29.5
1 22.5
2/1/1981
114 -19 30,ST
0
03
23
0 22
12 �;Lg.
0
6/1/1988
115 14,15,ST
�
17.5 C1
N ;
-03,04
6/1/1988
114 -23,24 31,32,ST
30
611 /1989
114 -01 33,ST
W o
02
21
2U
10
1 LLJ
1
1/1/1990
3/1/1990
113 -04,03 13,14,ST
27,ST 114 -34
Z
1 Z
3/111990
33,ST 114 -35
W
1
12/1/1993
—
117 -05 08,ST
01
19
18
07
\W\
8/1/1997
115 -06 16,ST
Q
125
2
117.5
1
1/1/2004
114 -26,34 36
r
10/1/2004
117 -04 09,ST
10/1/2004
117 -08 10,11
10/1/2004
117 -09,11 12
8/1/2005
114 -36 37,T
3/112009
114 -20 38,ST
3/1 /2009
114 -21 39,ST
111712019
114 -29,30 40
—Dec
2119
Page 56
f
0
t�l
Z-41 lz5ll i�
/Z� ' �ry
POR. N E. //4 SEC. S T. 6 S. R. 4 W
O
'oi•o8'30'' K� —
AA VENUE- I E- — 7 39S. S3' —
V.
T. R. A. 005 -043
f
5
zs' r
0(
P
rt/2
I
on
m -za
373 -09
L.
EH rl/ 2
I
s'
�0
r Q�
I N
EHru2
ASSESSORS MAP BK. 373 PG. O 9 M. B. 12188 Elsinore Heights Tr. Unit No. 2
f RIVERSIDE COUNTY CALIF
f
� L
/oo'
A
f
DATE OLD NO NEW NC
/0 /B/ 093 -16 S -T
J2 183 0-95-14 36, sr
3109 093- 17 57. Sr.
FEE PROPOSAL
Project Name:
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR
THE "AVENUES" DRAINAGE AREA STUDY AND
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS DESIGN
PROJECT NO. Z10000
Prepared for:
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
Attn: Carlos Norvani
Land Development Engineer
Engineering Department
130 S. Main Street
Lake Elsinore, California 92530
August 27, 2020
Prepared by:
Adams - Streeter Civil Engineers
FAA �J
ADAMS STREETER
C i v i l E n g i n e e r s
16755 Von Karman Ave. Suite 150, Irvine, CA 92606 1 949.474.2330 1 adarns- streeter.com
THE "AVENUES" DRAINAGE AREA STUDY & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS DESIGN
PROJECT HOURLY AND FEE BREAKDOWN SUMMARY
ITEM DESCRIPTION
Project
Director
Project
Manager
Project
Engineer
2 -Man
Survey
Survey
Office
Sub -
Consultant or
3rd Party
Vendor
TOTAL
FEE
Hourly Rate ($ /Hr.)
170 150 135 11 250 150
Phase 1A - Preliminary Engineering $70,140
1. Meetings, Project Management and Coordination
a. Project Management and Governmental Coordination
8
16
$3,760
b. Kick off & City Meeting (2 total)
6
6
$1,920
c. City Council Meeting (1 total)
4
$680
2. Information Research
a. Research /Review City Record Drawings & Atlas Maps
4
12
$2,220
b. Utility Notification, Information Request & Coordination
12
$1,800
3. Mapping and Initial Field Survey Verifications
a. Mapping Research for Underlying Record Maps and
Analysis of Site Constraints
2
16
$2,700
b. Title Search / Title Report (Budget for Title Company)
3
$3,000
$3,450
c. Initial Topographic Survey and Field Verifications
2
16
4
$4,900
d. Base Map Development
2
16
4
$3,060
4. Drainage Study
a. Field Review / Assessment of Site Conditions
4
4
$1,280
b. Geotechnical Review for Suitability of Alternatives
4
$600
c. Master Drainage Plan Review
3
3
$960
d. Development of Drainage Alternative (Incl. Supporting
Hydrology, Routing and Street Flow Calculations)
4
60
$9,680
e. Concept Level Cost Estimates for Drainage Alternatives
2
6
$1,240
f. Drainage Study Report
4
20
$3,680
5. Geotechnical Exploration, Analysis and Reporting
(By NMG Geotechnical)
$28,210
$28,210
a. Backgroud Review, Project Initiation and Permitting
($4,068)
b. Subsurface Exploration and Percolation Testing
($10,343)
c. Laboratory Testing
($3,159)
d. Geotechnical Analysis
($5,108)
e. Geotechnical Report
($4,092)
f. Project Management, Coordination and Meetings
($1,440)
Phase 1B - CEQA Documentation $39,389
1. CEQA Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration
a. Administrative Draft IS /MND
$15,787
$15,787
b. Prepare and Distribte Draft IS /MND / NOI / NOC
$4,708
$4,708
c. Administrative and Final IS /MND and MMRP
$6,255
$6,255
2. Technical Studies
a. Biological Resources Assessment
$6,534
$6,534
b. Cultural Resources Study
$6,105
$6,105
Phase 2 - Final Engineering $56,050
1. Meetings, Project Management and Coordination
a. Project Management and Governmental Coordination
8
16
$3,760
b. Pre- Design Meeting (1 total)
3
3
$960
c. Staff Collaboration Meetings (2 Assumed)
6
6
$1,920
2. Final Construction Documents
a. Grading and Drainage Plans
2
16
80
$13,540
b. Street Improvement Plans
2
16
60
$10,840
c. Erosion Control Plans
2
8
$1,380
d. Bid Schedule, Special Provisions and Technical
Specifications
4
20
$3,680
e. Itemized Cost Estimates
2
4
6
$1,750
f. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
2
8
24
$4,780
3. Design Topographical Survey
a. Undeveloped Sites (5 Locations Assumed)
8
$2,000
b. Street Cultures & Sections (Park Way & Pepper St.)
12
4
$3,600
4. Plats and Legal Descriptions
a. Drainage Alternative Sites (5 Locations Assumed)
2
2
48
$7,840
Phase 3 - Bid and Construction Support $3,940
1. Bid and Construction Support
2
24
$3,940
GRAND TOTAL
68
258
206
36
79
$70,599
$169,519
OPTIONAL ITEMS - HOURLY AND FEE BREAKDOWN SUMMARY
ITEM DESCRIPTION
Project
Director
Project
Manager
Project
Engineer
2 -Man
Survey
Survey
Office
Sub -
Consultant or
3rd Party
Vendor
TOTAL
FEE
Hourly Rate ($ /Hr.)
170
150
135
250
150
OP -1 Additional Geotechnical Borings and Percolation Testing
(Five Additional)
$11,355
$11,355
OP -2 Focused Burrowing Owl Surveys
$8,851
$8,851
OP -3 Focused Environmental Impact Report
$52,757
$52,757
a. Notice of Preparation / Scoping Meeting
b. Administrative Draft EIR
c. Draft EIRand Notices
d. Administravie Final EIR/Draft MMRP
e. Final EIR/Final MMRP /Notice of Determination
f. Statement of Overriding Considerations /Findings
2. g Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
1
6
30
$5,120
GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN SERVICES
DETAILED COST BREAKDOWN
Work Category
Staff Level
HourslQty Unit/Rate
Cost
TASK 1 - Background Review and Project Initiation
Background Review and Site Reconnaissance
Project
10 $146
$ 1,460
Principal /Associate
8
$180
$ 1,440
Encroachment Permit (Assume "No Fee ")
$ -
Water Service Permit For Infiltration Testing (Assume "No Fee ")
$ -
Staff Time for Permit Acquisition
Project
8
$146
$ 1,168
Subtotal:
$ 4,068
TASK 2 - Subsurface Exploration and Percolation Testing
Review /Mark Boring Locations
Project
6
$146
$ 876
USA Notification and Field Review
Project
6
$146
$ 876
Hollow -Stem Borings (4 borings, 10 -50 feet deep, PW)
Rig Rental
9
$385
$ 3,465
Percolation Testing Materials, Support Vehicle, Mob /Demob
$ 1,650
Logging and Sampling
Project
12
$146
$ 1,752
Percolation Testing, 2 locations
Senior Staff
10
$114
$ 1,140
Project
4
$146
$ 584
Subtotal:
$ 10,343
TASK 3 - Laboratory Testing
Moisture /Density
20
$28
$ 560
Grain Size
3
$104
$ 312
Atterberg limits
3
$160
$ 480
Hydrometer
3
$124
$ 372
Direct Shear
3
$200
$ 600
Consolidation
3
$205
$ 615
Maximum Density
1
$220
$ 220
Subtotal:
$ 3,159
TASK 4 - Geotechnical Analysis
Data Compilation /Boring Logs /Geotechnical Map
Project
8
$146
$ 1,168
Laboratory Test Data
Senior Staff
4
$114
$ 456
Plan Review
Project
4
$146
$ 584
Infiltration Analysis, Design Calculation
Project
4
$146
$ 584
Liquefaction Assessment
Project
4
$146
$ 584
Excavation /Shoring
Project
2
$146
$ 292
Principal Review
Principal /Associate
8
$180
$ 1,440
Subtotal:
$ 5,108
TASK 5 - Geotechnical Report
Project
12
$146
$ 1,752
Principal /Associate
10
$180
$ 1,800
Tech Illustrator
4
$96
$ 384
Word Processor
2
$78
$ 156
Subtotal:
$ 4,092
TASK 6 - Project Management, Coordination, and Meetings
Principal /Associate
8
$180
$ 1,440
Subtotal:
$ 1,440
TOTAL:
$ 28,210
Optional Items:
Additional Geotechnical Borings and Percolation Testing (5 Additional)
Hollow -Stem Borings (5 borings, 10 -50 feet deep, PW)
Rig Rental
7
$385
$ 2,695
Percolation Testing Materials, Support Vehicle
$ 900
Logging and Sampling
Project
9
$146
$ 1,314
Percolation Testing, 4 locations
Senior Staff
10
$114
$ 1,140
Project
8
$146
$ 1,168
Laboratory Testing
Moisture /Density
24
$28
$ 672
Grain Size
2
$104
$ 208
Atterberg limits
2
$160
$ 320
Hydrometer
2
$124
$ 248
Direct Shear
2
$200
$ 400
Consolidation
2
$205
$ 410
Maximum Density
1
$220
$ 220
Corrosivity
1
$200
$ 200
Data Compilation /Boring Logs /Geotechnical Map
Project
6
$146
$ 876
Infiltration Analysis, Design Calculation
Project
4
$146
$ 584
Subtotal:
$ 11,355
200821
CEQA Bidding Assumptions (ECORP Consulting)
❖ ECORP Consulting, Inc., assumes that, by receipt of notice to proceed, full access to the property will be
provided by the Client /City.
❖ ECORP Consulting, Inc., shall not be held responsible for work delays or cancellations caused by strikes,
accidents, acts of God, delays imposed by the Client /City, or other delays beyond the control of ECORP
Consulting, Inc.
❖ Schedule estimates are based on our best judgment of the requirements known at the time of the proposal
and can be influenced favorably or adversely by the Client needs and other circumstances, including agency
or other delays due to the COVID -19 pandemic.
❖ It is assumed that ECORP Consulting, Inc., can use and rely on the data and information contained in the
project related documents provided by the Client /City. ECORP Consulting, Inc., will not perform a technical
review of these documents, and will not be responsible for the content or accuracy of these studies.
❖ ECORP has assumed one round of comments /revisions for each deliverable. We have also assumed that
the project description will not change. Changes to the project description may affect cost and schedule.
❖ Additional hard or electronic copies can be provided on a time - and - materials basis.
❖ Change orders will be issued and signed by the Client and ECORP Consulting, Inc., before starting additional
work not provided for in the original proposal. If the Client's authorized representative is not available for
a signature, the additional out -of -scope work will not commence until the change order is signed.
❖ This cost is valid for a period of 90 days from the date of this the proposal. Beyond 90 days, ECORP
Consulting, Inc., reserves the right to reevaluate the cost.
❖ Expert Witness Testimony, including Depositions, is billed on a time - and - materials basis at time and a half.
❖ Attendance at meetings not listed in the scope of work are not included in the costs.
❖ AB 52 Tribal Cultural Resources Consultation will be conducted by the City.
AS
ADAMS STREETER
Civil Engineers
ADAMS STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS
2020 PROFESSIONAL FEE SCHEDULE
CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES
Principal................................................................................................................... ............................... $185.00 /hour
ProjectDirector .................................................................................................... ............................... $170.00 /hour
ProjectManager .................................................................................................. ............................... $150.00 /hour
ProjectEngineer .................................................................................................. ............................... $135.00 /hour
CADD Designer / Technician ......................................................................... ............................... $100.00 /hour
Clerical / Word Processing ................................................................................ ............................... $55.00 /hour
SURVEYING AND MAPPING SERVICES
2 -Man Survey Crew (Field) * ......................................................................... ............................... $250.00 /hour
1 -Man Survey Crew (Field) * ........................................................................... ............................... $215.00 /hour
Survey Office / Mapper ................................................................................... ............................... $150.00 /hour
* Prevailing Wage Rates.
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
All out of pocket expenses, such as filing and plan check fees, permit fees, delivery service,
reproduction printing, and other project expenses will be extra and invoiced at our direct cost.
SUB - CONSULTANTS
Expenses for sub - consultants employed by Adams Streeter will be marked up by 10 %.
MILEAGE
Mileage will be invoiced at the IRS standard mileage rate for 2020.
NMG
Geotechnical, Inc.
2019 PROFESSIONAL FEE SCHEDULE
HOURLY RATES BY STAFF CATEGORY
Principal and Associate Engineer / Geologist ....................................................... ............................... ...........................$180
ProjectEngineer / Geologist .................................................................................
............................... ...........................$146
Senior Staff Engineer /Geologist .........................................................................
............................... ...........................$114
SupervisoryTechnician ..................................................................................................................
............................... $114
StaffEngineer / Geologist .....................................................................................
............................... ...........................$104
SeniorProject Technician ..............................................................................................................
............................... $104
ProjectTechnician .........................................................................................................................
............................... $ 96
StaffTechnician .............................................................................................................................
............................... $ 86
SpecialInspector ............................................................................................................................
............................... $ 86
CAD Drafter /Technical Illustrator ...................................................................................................
..............................$ 96
WordProcessor .............................................................................................................................
............................... $ 78
TechnicalAssistant ........................................................................................................................
............................... $ 66
Prevailing Wage (Soil Technician /Special Inspection Services)
.......................... ............................... ...........................$118
LABORATORY TESTING
Moisture Content - ASTM D2166 ........ ..............................$
19
Moisture Content & Density ........... ..............................$
28
Atterberg Limits - ASTM D4318 ........ ...........................$160
Remolded Direct Shear -Slow -ASTM D3080 ...............$380
Particle -Size Sieve Analysis -ASTM D422 .......................$104
Residual Direct Shear -ASTM D3080 ... ...........................$580
Finer than No. 200 Sieve - ASTM D1140 ........................
$ 72
Hydrometer Analysis - ASTM D422 ..... ...........................$124
Asphalt Maximum Density - CT308 .... ...........................$250
Maximum Dry Density - ASTM D1557 . ...........................$220
Concrete, Mortar or Grout Compression
Maximum Dry Density with Oversize
(per cylinder /cube /prism) ......... ..............................$
Particle - ASTM D1557 ................. ...........................$250
CMU Grouted Prisms
Caltrans 216 Maximum Density ......... ...........................$200
- Compression Test < -8" x 8" x 16" .........................$
Sand Equivalent - ASTM D2419 ........ ..............................$
93
Soluble Sulfate Content .................. ..............................$
65
Expansion Index - ASTM D4829 ........... ...........................$166
Consolidation -ASTM D2435 .......... ...............................
$205
For time -rate, add $38 /increment
For remolded, add $54 /specimen
- For reload, add $105 /cycle
NOTES
Hydroconsolidation /Collapse - ASTM D5333 .................$130
Undisturbed Direct Shear - ASTM D3080 .......................$200
Undisturbed Direct Shear - Slow - ASTM D3080............$290
Remolded Direct Shear - ASTM D3080 ...........................$250
Remolded Direct Shear -Slow -ASTM D3080 ...............$380
Residual Direct Shear -ASTM D3080 ... ...........................$580
R -Value - CT301 /ASTM D2844 .............. ...........................$250
Asphalt Maximum Density - CT308 .... ...........................$250
Concrete, Mortar or Grout Compression
(per cylinder /cube /prism) ......... ..............................$
28
CMU Grouted Prisms
- Compression Test < -8" x 8" x 16" .........................$
195
- Compression Test >8" x 8" x 16" ..........................$
270
Gunite /Shotcrete Panel Coring & Testing .....................$109
1. No additional charges for field vehicle usage, nuclear gauge, or overtime work (except for prevailing wage and double
time).
2. Heavy equipment (i.e. drill rig, backhoe, CPT) charges will be invoiced at cost.
3. Delivery and outside reproduction charges will be invoiced at cost.
4. Outside laboratory test charges will be invoiced at cost.
17991 Fitch • Irvine, California 92614 • PHONE (949) 442 -2442 • FAX (949) 476 -8322 • www.nm22eotechnical.com
ADECORP
ENVIRONP
ECORP Consulting, Inc.
Schedule of Hourly Fees
Consulting, Inc.
ENTAL CONSULTANTS
Expense Reimbursement /Other:
1. Reproduction, equipment and other direct expenses are reimbursed at cost plus a 14- percent
administrative handling charge (excluding mileage and per diem).
2. Subcontractor expenses are reimbursed at cost plus a 12- percent administrative handling charge.
3. Mileage is reimbursed at the current IRS rate.
4. Rental vehicles will be charged at the current standard daily rate, typically $100 per day.
5. Per Diem, depending upon geography, may be charged if overnight stays are required.
6. Expert Witness Testimony, including Depositions, is billed at time and a half.
7. Hourly rates will escalate at a rate of 3% per annum.
Position
Program Manager
Hourly Rate
$200.00
QA /QC Manager
$195.00
Principal Environmental Analyst (CEQA /NEPA)
$200.00
Senior Environmental Analyst (CEQA /NEPA)
$185.00
Staff Environmental Analyst (CEQA /NEPA)
$125.00
Associate Environmental Analyst (CEQA /NEPA)
$110.00
Assistant Environmental Analyst (CEQA /NEPA)
$90.00
Principal Biologist
$200.00
Senior Biologist
$160.00
Staff Biologist
$125.00
Associate Biologist
$100.00
Assistant Biologist
$90.00
Biological Technician
$85.00
Principal Botanist /Habitat Restoration
$155.00
Senior Botanist /Habitat Restoration
$140.00
Assistant Botanist /Habitat Restoration
$100.00
Principal Paleontologist
$160.00
Cultural Resources Principal Investigator
$185.00
Senior Cultural Specialist /Historian /Lab /Field Director
$145.00
Cultural Resources Crew Chief
$115.00
Cultural Resources Field Technician
$90.00
Principal GIS /CADD /Graphics Specialist
$160.00
Senior GIS /CADD Specialist
$145.00
GIS /CADD Technician
$100.00
Graphics Specialist
$145.00
Senior Project Accountant /Contracts
$170.00
Associate Project Accountant /Contracts
$105.00
Production Coordinator /Proof Reader
$100.00
Associate Word Processor
$95.00
Clerical
$95.00
Expense Reimbursement /Other:
1. Reproduction, equipment and other direct expenses are reimbursed at cost plus a 14- percent
administrative handling charge (excluding mileage and per diem).
2. Subcontractor expenses are reimbursed at cost plus a 12- percent administrative handling charge.
3. Mileage is reimbursed at the current IRS rate.
4. Rental vehicles will be charged at the current standard daily rate, typically $100 per day.
5. Per Diem, depending upon geography, may be charged if overnight stays are required.
6. Expert Witness Testimony, including Depositions, is billed at time and a half.
7. Hourly rates will escalate at a rate of 3% per annum.
! is _ � •.� • � `� { _ � I 4N
Wl
doe
• j.., 1� `ice 1 i^
' oe. ,
_j. f • An.
•
MW
t� r OC •1 f I i-. ►-. 1
I . �"• . f • I IaCw 1 .•/; pent •M
fait lake SP 1 i j "pr nDn ai .
., • I ' w
+., ar