Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem No. 17 PA No. 2018-49 Pennington IndustrialText File City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 www.lake-elsinore.org File Number: ID# 19-574 Agenda Date: 4/28/2020 Status: Approval FinalVersion: 1 File Type: Council Public Hearing In Control: City Council / Successor Agency Agenda Number: 17) Page 1 City of Lake Elsinore Printed on 4/23/2020 Page 1 of 5 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Grant Yates, City Manager Prepared by: Damaris Abraham, Senior Planner Date: April 28, 2020 Subject: Planning Application No. 2018-49 (Pennington Industrial) – A new industrial park with three buildings (91,140 sq. ft. in total) and 167 parking spaces. Applicant: Rod Oshita, Pennington Industrial, LLC Recommendation adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (ER 2019-03) (SCH NO. 2019129075) FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 2018-49 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 37710 AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2019-01); and, adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS THAT PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 2018-49 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 37710 AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2019-01) IS CONSISTENT WITH THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP); and, adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 37710 SUBDIVIDING 5.01 ACRES INTO THREE PARCELS RANGING IN SIZE FROM 1.06 ACRES TO 2.01 ACRES LOCATED AT APN 377-160-014; and, adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2019-01 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THREE INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS (91,140 SQUARE FOOT IN TOTAL) AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED AT APN 377-160-014. Planning Commission Action On February 18, 2020, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing, accepted public oral and written testimony, provided recommendations, and by a unanimous (5- 0) vote recommended City Council approval. Project Location The Project site is located on a currently undeveloped site located at the southeasterly corner of Chaney Street and Minthorn Street (APN: 377-160-014). PA 2018-49 (Pennington Industrial) 04/28/2020 Page 2 of 5 Environmental Setting EXISTING LAND USE GENERAL PLAN ZONING Project Site Vacant Limited Industrial (LI) Limited Manufacturing (M-1) North Industrial Limited Industrial (LI) Limited Manufacturing (M-1) South School District Public Institutional (PI) Public Institutional (PI) East Government Offices Limited Industrial (LI) Limited Manufacturing (M-1) West Commercial Limited Industrial (LI) Commercial Manufacturing (C-M) Table 1: Environmental Setting Project Description The Pennington Industrial Project (Project) consists of applications for a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM No. 37710) and an Industrial Design Review (IDR No. 2019-01) which collectively are being processed under Planning Application No. 2018-49. TPM No. 37710 is proposing to subdivide the 5.01 gross acre site into three (3) parcels that are 1.06 acres, 1.72 acres, and 2.01 acres, respectively. IDR No. 2019-01 is proposing to construct three (3) industrial buildings that are 91,140 sq. ft. total with 167 parking spaces and related improvements on the same property as follows: Floor Plans:  Building 1: 32,940 sq. ft. building on Parcel 1 o First Floor: 30,940 sq. ft. o Mezzanine: 2,000 sq. ft.  Building 2: 39,000 sq. ft. building on Parcel 2 o First Floor: 37,000 sq. ft. o Mezzanine: 2,000 sq. ft.  Building 3: 19,200 sq. ft. building on Parcel 3 o First Floor: 18,200 sq. ft. o Mezzanine: 1,000 sq. ft. Architecture and Treatments The Project will incorporate a Contemporary Architectural Style with exterior cement pilaster with stucco finish. The design will include the use of wall offsets and recessed entries, multiple parapet heights, and decorative cornice treatments. Aluminum storefront windows with reflective glazing will be utilized on the building to create a uniform appearance. Landscaping The proposed landscaping plan has been designed to complement the architectural style for the proposed buildings. Several varieties of parking lot and interior accent trees will be provided to break-up expanses of pavement and provide shading. The proposed landscaping has been adequately designed to meet all water efficiency standards. PA 2018-49 (Pennington Industrial) 04/28/2020 Page 3 of 5 Site Access Two access driveways are proposed: (1) the northerly driveway to W. Minthorn Street, located 320 feet (curb return‐to‐curb return) east of Chaney Street, and (2) the westerly driveway located south of W. Minthorn Street, opposite the driveway of the adjacent property. Analysis General Plan Consistency The Project has a General Plan Land Use designation of Limited Industrial (LI) and is located in the Business District. The LI Land Use designation provides for industrial parks, warehouses, manufacturing, research and development, public and quasi-public uses, and similar and compatible uses with a maximum 0.45 Floor Area Ratio (FAR). The Project is proposing to develop an industrial park with 0.44 FAR. Therefore, the Project is consistent with the General Plan. Municipal Code Consistency The current zoning for the subject site is Limited Manufacturing (M-1). The M-1 zone is intended to reserve appropriate locations consistent with the General Plan for certain categories of light industrial uses that are relatively free of nuisance or hazardous characteristics and to protect these areas from intrusion by residential, commercial, and other inharmonious uses. The Project is proposing to construct industrial shell buildings for future tenants. Below are the relevant development standards applicable to the Project as identified in the M-1 zone: Development Standard Required Proposed Density 0.45 FAR 0.44 FAR Street Frontage width 100 ft. 141.72 ft. Front yard Setback 20 ft. 20 ft. Side yard Setback (ROW) 20 ft. 20 ft. Building Height 40 ft. 30 ft. Landscape improvements  Adjacent to Street 15 ft. min/Ave. 20ft 20 ft.  Landscape coverage 12% 12% Parking 122 167 Table 2: Development Standards The Project complies with the onsite parking standards listed in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), Chapter 17.148 (Parking Requirements). Section 17.148.030.C of the LEMC requires one (1) parking space for each 500 square feet of unit area for up to 20,000 square feet, plus one (1) space for each 1,000 square feet of unit area over 20,000 square feet, and one parking space for every 1,000 square feet of warehousing floor area. The Project is required to provide 122 parking spaces. The Project will have sufficient parking, as 167 parking spaces will be provided. The Project also complies with the non-residential development standards outlined in Chapter 17.112 of the LEMC. The Project provides a variety of building design features and forms by employing treatments, such as articulated planes along the exterior walls, attractive storefront window system, recessed suite entries and a variety of rooflines, which will create depth and shadow. The Project has also been designed to be compatible with surrounding commercial and PA 2018-49 (Pennington Industrial) 04/28/2020 Page 4 of 5 industrial buildings located near the Project vicinity. The proposed landscaping improvements will serve to enhance the building designs and soften portions of building elevations, provide shade and break-up expanses of pavement. The Design Review Committee that includes staff from Planning, Building and Safety, Fire, and Engineering have reviewed the proposed Project, and have conditioned the Project so as to mitigate any potential concerns. AB 52 Tribal Consultations On August 28, 2019, the City provided written notification of the Project in accordance with AB 52 to all of the Native American tribes that requested to receive such notification from the City. Staff received requests from the Rincon, Pechanga, and Soboba Tribes within the 30-day period, requesting to initiate consultation. The City met with Soboba on October 1, 2019 and with Rincon on October 24, 2019. On November 7, 2019, the City sent recommended mitigation measures to Pechanga, Rincon and Soboba. Consultation was concluded on November 8, 2019 with Rincon and on December 13, 2019 with both Pechanga and Soboba. Environmental Determination Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15063, an Initial Study (Environmental Review No. 2019- 03) was prepared for the Project to assess potential environmental impacts. The Initial Study revealed that the Project would have potentially significant environmental impacts but those potentially significant impacts could be mitigated to less than significant levels. A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) (SCH# 2019129075) was prepared and was made available for public review and comment for 30-day public review period from December 23, 2019 to January 21, 2020.The MND determined that the proposed Project would have potentially significant environmental impacts upon Biological Resources, Cultural and Tribal Resources, Geology and Soils, Noise, and Transportation. These impacts will be mitigated to below a level of significance through compliance with the mitigation measures set forth in the MND. Notice to all interested persons and agencies inviting comments on the MND was published in accordance with the provisions of CEQA, and posted at the Office of the County Clerk of Riverside County and at the State Clearinghouse on December 23, 2019 for a 30-day public comment period. Three (3) comment letters regarding the MND were received during the 30-day public comment period from South Coast Air Quality Management District (dated January 7, 2020), Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance (dated January 17, 2020), and California Air Resources Board (dated January 21, 2020). In reviewing the comments letters received, there is a prevailing concern that the proposed development would be better suited to be analyzed as a logistics facility. However, the proposed Project does not reflect a development consistent with a logistics facility, primarily due to the size of the proposed buildings. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) in their guidance document, attached for reference as Exhibit H, defines typical high cube warehouses (i.e. a logistics facility) as typically being located within a 200,000 sq. ft. single building and typically much larger in size and a part of a larger contiguous development. The proposed development does not include over 100,000 sq. ft. of total development and is spread out over three buildings. Further, the applicant provided additional technical information that included typical assessments of logistics facilities and the proposed Project did not create any new significant impacts than what was previously analyzed PA 2018-49 (Pennington Industrial) 04/28/2020 Page 5 of 5 Reponses to comments were prepared and are provided in the attached Exhibit G. There were no public comments or changes to the text or analysis contained in the MND that resulted in the identification of any new significant environmental effects. Only clarifications and amplifications were made to the MND in response to public comments. Therefore, in accordance with Section 15073.5 of the CEQA Guidelines a recirculation of the MND is not warranted. MSHCP Consistency The Project is consistent with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The Project site is not located in a Criteria Cell and was not required to be processed through the Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process (LEAP) and Joint Project Review (JPR) processes. The Project complies with all other applicable requirements of the MSHCP. Fiscal Impact The time and costs related to processing this Project have been covered by the Developer Deposit paid for by the applicant. No General Fund budgets have been allocated or used in the processing of this application. The approval of the Project does not fiscally impact the City’s General Fund. Mitigation Measures to protect the City fiscally have already been included in the Conditions of Approval. Exhibits A – CEQA Resolution A1 – Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program B – MSHCP Resolution C – TPM Resolution D – IDR Resolution E – Conditions of Approval F – IS/MND G – Response to Comments H – SCAQMD High-Cube Warehouse Guide I – Vicinity Map J – Aerial Map K – TPM 37710 L – Design Review Package RESOLUTION NO. 2020-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (ER 2019-03) (SCH NO. 2019129075) FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 2018-49 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 37710 AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2019-01) Whereas, Rod Oshita, Pennington Industrial, LLC has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore (City) requesting approval of Planning Application No. 2018-49 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 37710 and Industrial Design Review No. 2019-01) to subdivide the 5.01 gross acre site into three (3) parcels that are 1.06 acres, 1.72 acres, and 2.01 acres, respectively. The Project also proposes to construct three (3) industrial buildings that are 91,140 square foot (SF) in total with 167 parking spaces. Building 1 will have 32,940 SF gross floor area, Building 2 will have 39,000 SF gross floor area, and Building 3 will have 19,200 SF gloss floor area. Each building will consist of a planned open warehouse with truck access doors and a planned office area with mezzanine level. Hardscape, landscape, on-site stormwater management improvements, trash enclosure, and area lighting would be constructed as part of the Project. The proposed Project is at the southeasterly corner of Chaney Street and Minthorn Street (APN: 377-160-014); and, Whereas, the Project is subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.: “CEQA”) and the State Implementation Guidelines for CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15000, et seq.: “CEQA Guidelines”) because the Project involves an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and involves the issuance of a lease, permit license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies (Public Resources Code Section 21065); and, Whereas, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15063, the City conducted an Initial Study to determine if the Project would have a significant effect on the environment. The Initial Study revealed that the Project would have potentially significant environmental impacts but those potentially significant impacts could be mitigated to less than significant levels; and, Whereas, based upon the results of the Initial Study (Environmental Review No. 2019-03), and based upon the standards set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15070, it was determined that it was appropriate to prepare and circulate a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Project; and, Whereas, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15072, on December 23, 2019, the City duly issued a notice of intent to adopt the MND; and, Whereas, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, the MND was made available for public review and comment for a minimum of 30 days beginning on December 23, 2019, and ending on January 21, 2020; and, Whereas, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Project has been prepared in accordance with Section 21081.6 of CEQA; and, Whereas, the Planning Commission (Commission) has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council (Council) for adopting MNDs, and, CC Reso. No. 2020-____ Page 2 of 3 Whereas, the MND was sent to the Commission members on or about December 23, 2019, and was considered by the Commission on February 18, 2020 at a duly noticed Public Hearing and the Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties on the adequacy of the MND. The Commission adopted a resolution recommending that the Council adopt the MND for the Project; and, Whereas, on April 28, 2020, at a duly noticed Public Hearing, the Council has considered the recommendation of the Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into these findings by this reference. Section 2: The Council has evaluated all comments, written and oral, received from persons who have reviewed the MND. The Council hereby finds and determines that all public comments have been addressed. Section 3: The Council hereby finds that the MND for the Project is adequate and has been completed in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines and the City’s procedures for implementation of CEQA. The Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the MND and finds that the MND represents the independent judgment of the City. Section 4: The Council further finds and determines that none of the circumstances listed in CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5 requiring recirculation of the MND are present and that it would be appropriate to recommend adoption the MND as proposed to the Council. Section 5: The Council hereby makes, adopts, and incorporates the following findings regarding the lack of potential environmental impacts of the Project and the analysis and conclusions set forth in the MND: 1. Revisions in the Project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study was released for public review and mitigation measures set forth in the Initial Study would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur. Based upon the Initial Study conducted for the Project, there is substantial evidence suggesting that all potential impacts to the environment resulting from the Project can be mitigated to less than significant levels. All appropriate and feasible mitigation has been incorporated into the Project design. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan contains an implementation program for each mitigation measure. After implementation of the mitigation contained in the MMRP, potential environmental impacts are effectively reduced to less than significant levels. 2. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the agency including the initial study and any comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have significant effect on the environment. CC Reso. No. 2020-____ Page 3 of 3 Pursuant to the evidence received, including comment letters, and in the light of the whole record presented, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Section 7: Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval imposed upon the Project, the Council hereby adopts MND (ER 2019-03) and the MMRP, which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A1”, for Planning Application No. 2018-49 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 37710 and Industrial Design Review No. 2019-01). Section 8: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Section 9: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions. Passed and Adopted on this 28th day of April, 2020. Brian Tisdale, Mayor Attest: ___________________________________ Candice Alvarez, MMC City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, Candice Alvarez, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2020-____ was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, at the regular meeting of April 28, 2020, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Candice Alvarez, MMC City Clerk Pennington Industrial Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 1 | P a g e Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation Timing Responsible Monitoring Party Monitoring/Reporting Method Biological Resources MM Bio 1: Burrowing Owl Surveys. Due to the presence of suitable habitat onsite for the western burrowing owl, a qualified biologist shall conduct pre-construction focused species surveys within 30-days prior to any ground disturbing activities at the project site where suitable habitat is present. If burrowing owls are determined to occupy the project site during preconstruction surveys, CDFW shall be consulted and a passive relocation program shall be undertaken to relocate owls to an area outside the impact zone. The relocation shall be conducted following accepted protocols and would occur outside of the breeding season for the burrowing owl. Existing burrows shall be destroyed once they are vacated. Prior to the issuance of grading permit Planning and Engineering Dept. Biological Resources MM Bio 2: MSHCP Fees. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant/developer shall pay the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (WRMSHCP) development mitigation fees, in effect at the time permits are issued. Prior to the issuance of grading permit Planning, Building and Engineering Dept. Biological Resources MM Bio 3: SKR Fees. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant/developer shall pay the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan (SKRHCP) fees, in effect at the time permits are issued. Prior to the issuance of grading permit Planning, Building, and Engineering Dept. Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources MM Cul 1: Unanticipated Resources. The developer/permit holder or any successor in interest shall comply with the following for the life of this permit. If during ground disturbance activities, unanticipated cultural resources are discovered, the following procedures shall be followed: 1. All ground disturbance activities within 100 feet of the discovered cultural resource shall be halted until a meeting is convened between the developer, the Project Archaeologist, the Native American tribal representative(s) from consulting tribes (or other Ongoing during ground disturbing activities Planning and Engineering Dept. Pennington Industrial Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2 | P a g e appropriate ethnic/cultural group representative), and the Community Development Director or their designee to discuss the significance of the find. 2. The developer shall call the Community Development Director or their designee immediately upon discovery of the cultural resource to convene the meeting. 3. At the meeting with the aforementioned parties, the significance of the discoveries shall be discussed and a decision is to be made, with the concurrence of the Community Development Director or their designee, as to the appropriate mitigation (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural resource. 4. Further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until a meeting has been convened with the aforementioned parties and a decision is made, with the concurrence of the Community Development Director or their designee, as to the appropriate mitigation measures. Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources MM Cul 2: Discovery of Human Remains. In the event that human remains (or remains that may be human) are discovered at the project site during grading or earthmoving, the construction contractors, project archaeologist and/or designated Native American Monitor shall immediately stop all activities within 100 feet of the find. The project applicant shall then inform the Riverside County Coroner and the City of Lake Elsinore Community Development Department immediately, and the coroner shall be permitted to examine the remains as required by California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(b). Section 7050.5 requires that excavation be stopped in the vicinity of discovered human remains and that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. If human remains are determined to be Native American, the applicant shall comply with the state law relating to the disposition of Native American burials that fall within the jurisdiction of the NAHC (PRC Section 5097). The coroner shall contact the NAHC within 24 hours and the NAHC will make the determination of most Ongoing during ground disturbing activities Planning and Engineering Dept. Pennington Industrial Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 3 | P a g e likely descendant. The most likely descendant shall then make recommendations and engage in consultation concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resource Code Section 5097.98. In the event that the applicant and the MLD are in disagreement regarding the disposition of the remains. State law will apply and the mediation process will occur with the NAHC, if requested (see PRC Section 5097.98(e) and 5097.94(k)). According to the California Health and Safety Code, six or more human burial at one location constitutes a cemetery (Section 81 00), and disturbance of Native American cemeteries is a felony (Section 7052). Geology and Soils MM Geo 1: Compliance with Recommendations from the Geotechnical Interpretive Report. Per the Preliminary Foundation Design Recommendations section of the Geotechnical Report, the Project shall comply with the recommendations for: Conventional Footings, Building Floor Slabs, and Post Tensioned Slab/Foundation Design Recommendations as described below: a. Conventional Footings • Exterior continuous footings should be founded at the minimum depths below the lowest adjacent final grade (i.e. minimum 18 inch depth for one-story and two-story, and minimum 24 inch depth for three-story construction). Interior continuous footings for one-, two-, and three-story construction may be founded at a minimum depth of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade. In accordance with Table 1809.7 of the 2016 CBC, all continuous footings should have a minimum width of 12, 15, and 18 inches, for one-, two-, and three- story structures, respectively, and should be reinforced with a minimum of four (4) No. 4 bars, two (2) top and two (2) bottom. • Exterior pad footings intended to support roof overhangs, such as second story decks, patio covers and similar construction should be a minimum of 24 inches square and founded at a minimum depth of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade. The pad footings should be reinforced with a minimum of No. 4 bars spaced a maximum of 18 Prior to issuance of building permit Planning and Building Dept. Building Plan Review and Issuance of Building Permits Pennington Industrial Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4 | P a g e inches on center, each way, and should be placed near the bottom- third of the footings. b. Building Floor Slabs • Building floor slabs should be a minimum of 4 inches thick. All floor slabs should be reinforced with a minimum of No. 3 bars spaced a maximum of 18 inches on center, each way, supported by concrete chairs or bricks to ensure desired mid-depth placement. Based on an assumed effective plasticity index of 16, the project architect or structural engineer should evaluate minimum floor slab thickness and reinforcement in accordance with 2016 CBC Section 1808.6.2. • Building floor slabs with moisture sensitive or occupied areas, should be underlain by a minimum 10-mil thick moisture barrier to help reduce the upward migration of moisture from the underlying soils. The moisture barrier should be properly installed using the guidelines of ACI publication 318-05 and meet the performance standards of ASTM E 1745 Class A material. Prior to placing concrete, it is the responsibility of the contractor to ensure that the moisture barrier is properly placed and free of openings, rips, or punctures. As an option for additional moisture protection and foundation strength, higher strength concrete, such as a minimum compressive strength of 5,000 pounds per square inch (psi) in 28-days may be used. In addition, a capillary break/vapor retarder for concrete slabs should be provided in accordance with CALGreen. Ultimately, the design of the moisture barrier system along with recommendations for concrete placement and curing are the purview of the foundation engineer, factoring in the project conditions provided by the architect and owner. • Garage floor slabs should be a minimum of 5 inches thick and should be reinforced in a similar manner as living area floor slabs. Garage floor slabs should be placed separately from adjacent wall footings with a positive separation maintained with ⅜ inch minimum felt expansion joint materials and quartered with weakened plane joints. A 12 inch wide turn down founded at the same depth as adjacent footings should be provided across garage entrances. The Pennington Industrial Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 5 | P a g e turn down should be reinforced with a minimum of two (2) No. 4 bars, one (1) top and one (1) bottom. • Prior to placing concrete, the subgrade soils below all floor slabs should be pre-watered to achieve a moisture content at least 1.1 times optimum. The moisture content should penetrate a minimum depth of 12 inches into the subgrade soils. The pre-watering should be verified and tested by CW Soils. c. Post Tensioned Slab/Foundation Design Recommendations In lieu of the proceeding foundation recommendations, post tensioned slabs may be used for the proposed structures. Post tension foundations are generally considered to be a better foundation system, but may be slightly higher in overall cost. The foundation engineer may design the post tensioned foundation system using the following Post Tensioned Foundation Slab Design table. These parameters have been provided in general accordance with Post Tensioned Design. Alternate designs addressing the effects of expansive soils are allowed per 2016 CBC Section 1808.6.2. When utilizing these parameters, the foundation engineer should design the foundation system in accordance with the allowable deflection criteria of applicable codes. It should be noted that the post tensioned design methodology is partially based on the assumption that soils moisture changes around and underneath post tensioned slabs, are only influenced by climate conditions. With regard to expansive soils, moisture variations below slabs are the major factor in foundation damage. However, the design methodology does not take into account presaturation, owner irrigation, or other non-climate related influences on the moisture content of the subgrade soils. In recognition of these realities, we modified the soils parameters obtained from this methodology to help account for reasonable irrigation practices. Additionally, the slab subgrades should be presoaked to a depth of 12 inches and maintained at above optimum moisture until placing concrete. Furthermore, prior to placing concrete, the subgrade soils below all Pennington Industrial Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 6 | P a g e floor slabs and perimeter footings should be presoaked to achieve moisture contents at least 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 times optimum to depths of 6, 12, 18, and 24 inches for Low, Medium, High, and Very High expansion potential soils, respectively. The moisture content should penetrate to a minimum depth of 24 inches into the subgrade soils. The pre-watering should be verified and tested by CW Soils. Ponding water near the foundation can significantly change the moisture content of the soils below the foundation, causing excessive foundation movement and detrimental effects. Our recommendations do not account for excessive irrigation and/or incorrect landscape designs. To prevent moisture infiltration below the foundation, planters placed adjacent to the foundation should be designed with an effective drainage system or liners. Some lifting of the perimeter foundation should be expected even with properly constructed planters. Future owners should be informed and educated of the importance in maintaining a consistent level of moisture within the soils around structures. Potential negative consequences can result from either excessive watering or allowing expansive soils to become too dry. Expansive soils will shrink as they dry, followed by swelling during the rainy winter season or when irrigation is resumed, causing distress to site improvements. Noise MM NOI 1: Construction Buffer. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Property Owner/Developer shall include a note on the grading and building plans that no large mobile equipment (greater than 80,000 pounds), loaded trucks, and jackhammers shall be operated within 90 feet of the southwest property line. Prior to the issuance of grading permit Ongoing during ground disturbing activities Planning and Engineering Dept. Grading Plan Review and Issuance of Grading Permits Pennington Industrial Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 7 | P a g e Transportation MM Trans 1: Pay Project Fair-Share. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, the Property Owner/Developer shall pay its fair-share to construct: a) A traffic signal at the intersection of Collier Avenue at Chaney Street. b) A separate northbound left turn lane from Collier Avenue to Chaney Street. Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy Planning, Engineering, and Building Dept. Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy RESOLUTION NO. 2020-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS THAT PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 2018- 49 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 37710 AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2019-01) IS CONSISTENT WITH THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) Whereas, Rod Oshita, Pennington Industrial, LLC has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore (City) requesting approval of Planning Application No. 2018-49 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 37710 and Industrial Design Review No. 2019-01) to subdivide the 5.01 gross acre site into three (3) parcels that are 1.06 acres, 1.72 acres, and 2.01 acres, respectively. The Project also proposes to construct three (3) industrial buildings that are 91,140 square foot (SF) in total with 167 parking spaces. Building 1 will have 32,940 SF gross floor area, Building 2 will have 39,000 SF gross floor area, and Building 3 will have 19,200 SF gloss floor area. Each building will consist of a planned open warehouse with truck access doors and a planned office area with mezzanine level. Hardscape, landscape, on-site stormwater management improvements, trash enclosure, and area lighting would be constructed as part of the Project. The proposed Project is at the southeasterly corner of Chaney Street and Minthorn Street (APN: 377-160-014); and, Whereas, Section 6.0 of the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) requires that all discretionary projects within a MSHCP Criteria Cell undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process (LEAP) and the Joint Project Review (JPR) to analyze the scope of the proposed development and establish a building envelope that is consistent with the MSHCP criteria; and, Whereas, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP further requires that the City adopt consistency findings demonstrating that the proposed discretionary entitlement complies with the MSHCP Criteria Cell, and the MSHCP goals and objectives; and, Whereas, pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Section 17.415.050 (Major Design Review) and Chapter 16.24 (Tentative Map) the Planning Commission (Commission) has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council (Council) pertaining to tentative maps and design review applications; and, Whereas, on February 4, 2020 and February 18, 2020, at a duly noticed Public Hearing the Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item, and adopted a resolution recommending that the Council adopt Findings of Consistency with the MSHCP; and, Whereas, on April 28, 2020, at a duly noticed Public Hearing, the Council has considered the recommendation of the Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Council has considered the Project and its consistency with the MSHCP prior to adopting Findings of Consistency with the MSHCP. Section 2: That in accordance with the MSHCP, the Council makes the following findings for MSHCP consistency: CC Reso. No. 2020-____ Page 2 of 4 1. The Project is a project under the City’s MSHCP Resolution, and the City must make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval. Pursuant to the City’s MSHCP Resolution, the Project is required to be reviewed for MSHCP consistency, including consistency with other “Plan Wide Requirements.” The Project site is not located within a MSHCP Criteria Cell. Based upon the site reconnaissance survey there are no issues regarding consistency with the MSHCP’s other “Plan Wide Requirements.” The only requirements potentially applicable to the Project were the Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines (Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP) and payment of the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee (Section 4 of the MSHCP Ordinance). The Project site is located in a previously disturbed site, and has no habitat, including riparian/riverine areas or vernal pools, present on site. 2. The Project is subject to the City’s LEAP and the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority’s (RCA) Joint Project Review processes. As stated above, the Project is not located within a Criteria Cell and therefore was not required to go through the LEAP and JPR processes. 3. The Project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools Guidelines. The subject property has been previously disturbed and was used as a contractor’s storage yard. A construction materials debris pile was observed in the south corner of the site. Due to the numerous disturbances of the proposed Project site, there is little habitat value for the MSHCP and other special status species. As such, the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP are not applicable. 4. The Project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines. The Project site is not located within the Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Areas as shown on Figure 6-1 of the MSHCP. The Project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.1.3 of the MSHCP 5. The Project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. The Property is not subject to any of the Critical Area Species Survey Area Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.3.2 of the MSHCP, with the exception of Burrowing Owl. No burrowing owls or burrowing owl signs were observed within the Project site or adjacent lands. The Project site does not support any active burrows or suitable habitat due to the heavy soil composition, ongoing mechanical disturbance of the site, and the surrounding commercial urban setting. As required by the MSHCP, mitigation has been included to conduct a Burrowing Owl survey 30 days prior to any ground-disturbance, including removal vegetation or other debris. Therefore, the Project is consistent with MSHCP Section 6.3.2. 6. The Project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines. The Property is surrounded by existing development or graded parcels planned for development. Therefore, the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines set forth in Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP are not applicable. 7. The Project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements. CC Reso. No. 2020-____ Page 3 of 4 The Project consists of the establishment of an athletic training facility within an existing building on a fully developed site. There are no resources located on the Project site requiring mapping as set forth in MSCHP Section 6.3.1. 8. The Project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines. As stated above, the Property is surrounded by existing and planned development. Therefore, the Fuels Management Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.4 of the MSHCP are not applicable. 9. The Project will be conditioned to pay the City’s MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. As a condition of approval, the Project will be required to pay the City’s MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee at the time of issuance of building permits. 10. The Project is consistent with the MSHCP. The Project site is not within or adjacent to any MSHCP Criteria Cell or conservation areas. As described above, the Project complies with all applicable MSHCP requirements. Section 3: Based upon the evidence presented, both written and testimonial, and the above findings, the Council hereby finds that the Project is consistent with the MSHCP. Section 4: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Section 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions. Passed and Adopted on this 28th day of April, 2020. Brian Tisdale, Mayor Attest: ___________________________________ Candice Alvarez, MMC City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, Candice Alvarez, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2020-____ was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, at the regular meeting of April 28, 2020, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: CC Reso. No. 2020-____ Page 4 of 4 ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Candice Alvarez, MMC City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2020-___ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 37710 SUBDIVIDING 5.01 ACRES INTO THREE PARCELS RANGING IN SIZE FROM 1.06 ACRES TO 2.01 ACRES LOCATED AT APN 377-160-014 Whereas, Rod Oshita, Pennington Industrial, LLC has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore (City) requesting approval of Planning Application No. 2018-49 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 37710 and Industrial Design Review No. 2019-01) to subdivide the 5.01 gross acre site into three (3) parcels that are 1.06 acres, 1.72 acres, and 2.01 acres, respectively. The Project also proposes to construct three (3) industrial buildings that are 91,140 square foot (SF) in total with 167 parking spaces. Building 1 will have 32,940 SF gross floor area, Building 2 will have 39,000 SF gross floor area, and Building 3 will have 19,200 SF gloss floor area. Each building will consist of a planned open warehouse with truck access doors and a planned office area with mezzanine level. Hardscape, landscape, on-site stormwater management improvements, trash enclosure, and area lighting would be constructed as part of the Project. The proposed Project is at the southeasterly corner of Chaney Street and Minthorn Street (APN: 377-160-014); and, Whereas, pursuant to Chapter 16.24 (Tentative Map) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the Planning Commission (Commission) has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council (Council) pertaining to tentative maps; and, Whereas, on February 4, 2020 and February 18, 2020, at a duly noticed Public Hearing, the Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item and adopted a resolution recommending that the Council approve Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 37710; and, Whereas, pursuant to Section 16.24.120 of the LEMC, the Council has the responsibility of making decisions to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove recommendations of the Commission for tentative maps; and, Whereas, on April 28, 2020, at a duly noticed Public Hearing, the Council has considered the recommendation of the Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Council has reviewed and analyzed the proposed Project pursuant to the appropriate Planning and Zoning Laws, and Chapter 16 (Subdivisions) of the LEMC. Section 2: On April 28, 2020, after consideration and evaluation of all written reports and comments and oral testimony presented by the Community Development Department and other City departments, property owners, residents and other interested parties and such other matters as are reflected in the record of the noticed Public Hearing on the Project, the Council adopted a resolution finding and determining that the Mitigated Negative Declaration (ER 2019-03) (SCH No. 2019129075) is adequate and is prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. Section 3: That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law and the LEMC, the Council makes the following findings for approval of TPM 37710: CC Reso. No. 2020-____ Page 2 of 3 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). a. The Project has a General Plan Land Use designation of Limited Industrial (LI) and is located in the Business District. The BP Land Use designation provides for industrial parks warehouses, manufacturing, research and development, public and quasi-public uses, and similar and compatible uses with a maximum 0.45 Floor Area Ratio (FAR). The project is proposing to develop an industrial park with 0.44 FAR. Therefore, the Project is consistent with the General Plan b. All offsite mitigation measures have been identified in a manner consistent with the General Plan. 2. The site of the proposed subdivision of land is physically suitable for the proposed density of development in accordance with the General Plan. a. The overall density and design is consistent and compatible with the adjacent communities. 3. The effects that this project are likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources have been considered and balanced. a. The Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan. The Project has a Limited Industrial (LI) Land Use Designation and will not have a direct impact on housing needs. During the approval of the General Plan, housing needs, public services and fiscal resources were scrutinized to achieve a balance within the City. 4. The proposed division of land or type of improvements is not likely to result in any significant environmental impacts. a. The Project has been adequately conditioned by all applicable departments and agencies and will not therefore result in any significant environmental impacts. The Project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 5. The design of the proposed division of land or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. a. TPM 37710 has been designed in a manner consistent with the General Plan and does not divide previously established communities. 6. The design of the proposed division of land or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed division of land. a. All known easements or request for access have been incorporated into the design of TPM 37710. CC Reso. No. 2020-____ Page 3 of 3 b. The map has been circulated to City departments and outside agencies, and appropriate Conditions of Approval have been applied to the Project. Section 4: Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval imposed upon the Project, the Council hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 37710. Section 5: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Section 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions. Passed and Adopted on this 28th day of April, 2020. Brian Tisdale, Mayor Attest: ___________________________________ Candice Alvarez, MMC City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, Candice Alvarez, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2020-____ was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, at the regular meeting of April 28, 2020, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Candice Alvarez, MMC City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2020-___ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2019-01 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THREE INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS (91,140 SQUARE FOOT IN TOTAL) AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED AT APN 377-160-014 Whereas, Rod Oshita, Pennington Industrial, LLC has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore (City) requesting approval of Planning Application No. 2018-49 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 37710 and Industrial Design Review No. 2019-01) to subdivide the 5.01 gross acre site into three (3) parcels that are 1.06 acres, 1.72 acres, and 2.01 acres, respectively. The Project also proposes to construct three (3) industrial buildings that are 91,140 square foot (SF) in total with 167 parking spaces. Building 1 will have 32,940 SF gross floor area, Building 2 will have 39,000 SF gross floor area, and Building 3 will have 19,200 SF gloss floor area. Each building will consist of a planned open warehouse with truck access doors and a planned office area with mezzanine level. Hardscape, landscape, on-site stormwater management improvements, trash enclosure, and area lighting would be constructed as part of the Project. The proposed Project is at the southeasterly corner of Chaney Street and Minthorn Street (APN: 377-160-014); and, Whereas, pursuant to Section 17.415.050 (Major Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the Planning Commission (Commission) has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council (Council) pertaining to design reviews; and, Whereas, on February 4, 2020 and February 18, 2020 at a duly noticed Public Hearing the Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item and adopted a resolution recommending that the Council approve Industrial Design Review (IDR) No. 2019-01; and, Whereas, pursuant to Section 17.410.070 of the LEMC, the Council has the responsibility of making decisions to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove recommendations of the Commission for design review applications; and, Whereas, on April 28, 2020, at a duly noticed Public Hearing, the Council has considered the recommendation of the Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Council has reviewed and analyzed the proposed Project pursuant to the California Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 59000 et seq.), the Lake Elsinore General Plan (GP), and the LEMC and finds and determines that the proposed Project is consistent with the requirements of California Planning and Zoning Law and with the goals and policies of the GP, and the LEMC. Section 2: On April 28, 2020, after consideration and evaluation of all written reports and comments and oral testimony presented by the Community Development Department and other City departments, property owners, residents and other interested parties and such other matters as are reflected in the record of the noticed Public Hearing on the Project, the Council adopted a resolution finding and determining that the Mitigated Negative Declaration (ER 2019-03) (SCH No. 2019129075) is adequate and is prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. CC Reso. No. 2020-____ Page 2 of 3 Section 3: That in accordance with Section 17.415.050.G of the LEMC, the Council makes the following findings regarding IDR No. 2019-01: 1. The Project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan, Specific Plan and the Zoning District in which the Project is located. The Project complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan because it will assist in achieving the development of a well-balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational, and institutional land uses. The Project will serve to diversify and expand Lake Elsinore’s economic base. 2. The Project complies with the design directives contained in the General Plan and all other applicable provisions of the LEMC. The Project is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments and blends in with the surrounding industrial development. Sufficient setbacks and enhanced onsite landscaping have been provided thereby creating interest and varying vistas as a person moves along abutting streets and within the park. The Project will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed development and existing projects through the use of a ‘Contemporary’ architectural design that is similar to existing industrial developments in the vicinity. In addition, safe and efficient circulation has been achieved onsite. 3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.415.050.G.3 of the LEMC, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the Project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Section 17.415.050. Pursuant to Section 17.415.050.E of the LEMC, the Project was considered by the Planning Commission at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on February 18, 2020 and subsequently by the City Council at a noticed Public Hearing on April 28, 2020. The Project, as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City divisions, departments and agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment. Section 4: Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval imposed upon the Project, the Council hereby approves IDR No. 2019-01. Section 5: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Section 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions. Passed and Adopted on this 28th day of April, 2020. Brian Tisdale, Mayor CC Reso. No. 2020-____ Page 3 of 3 Attest: ___________________________________ Candice Alvarez, MMC City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, Candice Alvarez, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2020-____ was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, at the regular meeting of April 28, 2020, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Candice Alvarez, MMC City Clerk Applicant’s Initials: _____ Page 1 of 18 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PROJECT: PA 2018-49/TPM 37710/IDR 2019-01 PROJECT NAME: Pennington Industrial PROJECT LOCATION: APN: 377-160-014 APPROVAL DATE: EFFECTIVE DATE: EXPIRATION DATE: GENERAL 1. Planning Application No. 2018-49 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 37710 and Industrial Design Review No. 2019-01) is a proposal to construct three (3) industrial buildings ranging in size from 19, 200 sq. ft. to 39,000 sq. ft. (91,140 square foot total) with 167 parking spaces. The tentative parcel map proposes to subdivide the 5.01 gross acre site into three (3) parcels that are 1.06 acres, 1.72 acres, and 2.01 acres, respectively (Project). The Project is located at the located at the southeasterly corner of Chaney Street and Minthorn Street (APN: 377- 160-014). 2. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, Agents, and its Consultants (Indemnitees) from any claim, action, or proceeding against the Indemnitees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning approval, implementation and construction of IDR 2019-01 and TPM 37710, which action is bought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and/or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code Section 21167, including the approval, extension or modification of IDR 2019-01 and TPM 37710 or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant's indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys' fees, penalties and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. The City will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City. If the project is challenged in court, the City and the applicant shall enter into formal defense and indemnity agreement, consistent with this condition. 3. Within 30 days of project approval, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 4. The applicant shall submit a check for $2,406.75 made payable to the County of Riverside for the filing of a Notice of Determination. The check shall be submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the project’s approval. Fees 5. The applicant shall pay all applicable fees as identified in Exhibit A, at the rate in effect at the time of payment by the payment milestone. No deferral of fees shall be granted unless approved by the City Council, which will require the applicant to execute a contract or other written instrumtent to pay the fee or charge at a later milestone than what is specified in Conditions of Approval PC: TBD PA 2018-49/TPM 37710/IDR 2019-01 CC: TBD Applicant’s Initials: _____ Page 2 of 18 Exhibit A. PLANNING DIVISION 6. Tentative Parcel Map No. 37710 will expire two years from the date of approval unless within that period of time a Final Map has been filed with the County Recorder, or an extension of time is granted by the City Council in accordance with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). 7. Tentative Parcel Map No. 37710 shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and applicable requirements contained in the LEMC, unless modified by these Conditions of Approval. 8. Industrial Design Review No. 2019-01 shall lapse and become void two years following the date on which the design review became effective, unless one of the following: (1) prior to the expiration of two years, a building permit related to the design review is issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion; or (2) prior to the expiration of two years, the applicant has applied for and has been granted an extension of the design review approval pursuant to subsections (1) and (2) of LEMC, Section 17.415.050.I.1. Notwithstanding conditions to the contrary, a design review granted pursuant to LEMC Section 17.415.050.I.2 shall run with the land for this two-year period, subject to any approved extensions, and shall continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the site, which was the subject of the design review application. 9. The applicant shall provide all project-related on-site and off-site improvements as required by these Conditions of Approval. 10. All Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on page one of building plans prior to their acceptance by the Building and Safety Division, Community Development Department. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 11. All future development proposals shall be reviewed by the City on a project by project basis. If determined necessary by the Community Development Director or designee, additional environmental analysis will be required. 12. Any proposed minor revisions to approved plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director or designee. Any proposed substantial revisions to the approved plans shall be reviewed according to the provisions of the Municipal Code in a similar manner as a new application. 13. Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance (LEMC Chapter 17.176) shall be satisfied during all site preparation and construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and shall cease no later than 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Only finish work and similar interior construction may be conducted on Saturdays and may commence no earlier than 8:00 am and shall cease no later than 4:00 p.m. Construction activity shall not take place on Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. 14. No individual signs are approved as part of this approval. The applicant or designee shall submit an application for a sign permit, pay appropriate fees and receive approval from the Community Development Department for any sign(s) installed at the project site. OR The applicant shall submit a sign program for review and approval of the Planning Commission Conditions of Approval PC: TBD PA 2018-49/TPM 37710/IDR 2019-01 CC: TBD Applicant’s Initials: _____ Page 3 of 18 prior to installation. 15. Graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. 16. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 17. All roof mounted or ground support air conditioning units or other mechanical equipment incidental to development shall be architecturally screened or shielded by landscaping so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Any roof mounted central swamp coolers shall also be screened, and the Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permit shall approve screening plan. 18. The property address (in numerals at least six inches high) shall be displayed near the entrance and be easily visible from the front of the subject property and public right-of-way. 19. The applicant shall construct trash enclosure(s) with a decorative roof to match the colors, materials and design of the project architecture. 20. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Community Development Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 21. The proposed location of on-site construction trailers shall be approved by the Community Development Director or designee. A cash bond of $1,000 shall be required for any construction trailers placed on the site and used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to approval of the Community Development Director or designee. Such trailer(s) shall be fully on private property and outside the public right of way. 22. If any of the conditions of approval set forth herein fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits, deny revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. Prior to Recordation of Final Map(s) 23. All lots shall comply with minimum standards set forth in Chapter 17.136 (M-1 Limited Manufacturing District) of the LEMC. 24. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots shall be provided per the LEMC. 25. All of the project improvements shall be designed by the applicant's Civil Engineer to the specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore. Conditions of Approval PC: TBD PA 2018-49/TPM 37710/IDR 2019-01 CC: TBD Applicant’s Initials: _____ Page 4 of 18 Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits/Building Permits 26. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) for review and approval. The applicant shall incorporate all EVMWD required conditions and standards. 27. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 28. Prior to issuance of Building Permit, the Applicant shall submit a photometric study to the Community Development Department for review and approval. The plan shall ensure that all exterior on-site lighting are shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring properties and streets or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture. 29. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, all exterior wall mounted and freestanding light fixtures shall be submitted for review and approval by the Director of Community Development, or their designee. Light fixtures shall compliment the architectural style of the buildings onsite. 30. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the color, finish and pattern of all decorative paving onsite shall be submitted for review and approval by the Director of Community Development, or their designee. 31. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Final Landscaping / Irrigation Detail Plans (one full size set along with a PDF copy) shall be submitted along with appropriate fees for review and approval by the Community Development Director or designee. a. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with 50% plant coverage using a drip irrigation method. b. All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six inch (6”) high and six inch (6”) wide concrete curb. Runoff shall be allowed from paved areas into landscape areas. c. Planting within fifteen feet (15’) of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than twenty- four inches (24”). d. Landscape planters shall be planted with an appropriate parking lot shade tree pursuant to the LEMC and Landscape Design Guidelines. e. No required tree planting bed shall be less than 5 feet wide. f. Root barriers shall be installed for all trees planted within 10 feet of hardscape areas to include sidewalks. g. Any transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan and screened as part of the landscaping plan. h. The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the City’s adopted Landscape Guidelines. i. All landscape improvements shall be bonded 100% for material and labor for two years from installation sign-off by the City. Release of the landscaping bond shall be requested by the applicant at the end of the required two years with approval/acceptance reviewed by the Landscape Consultant and approved by the Community Development Director or Designee. Conditions of Approval PC: TBD PA 2018-49/TPM 37710/IDR 2019-01 CC: TBD Applicant’s Initials: _____ Page 5 of 18 j. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within affected portion of any phase at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is requested for any building. k. Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan. l. Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details. m. Final landscape plans shall include drought tolerant planting consistent with Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District standards subject to plan check and approval by the City’s landscape plan check consultant. n. No turf shall be permitted. BUILDING DIVISION General Conditions 32. Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety Conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 33. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2019 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes: 2019 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, 2019 California Energy Codes, 2019 California Green Building Standards, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 34. Green Measures. The application shall provide 10% voluntary green measures on the project, as stipulated by the 2019 California Green Building Standards. 35. Disabled Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. All ground floor units to be adaptable. b. Disabled access from the public way to the entrance of the building. c. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as clubhouse, trach enclosure tot lots and picnic areas. 36. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi-family residential projects or a recorded final map for single- family residential projects. It takes 10 days to issue address and notify other agencies 37. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 38. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. 39. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. Septic systems will need to be approved from Riverside County Environmental Health Department before permit issuance. Conditions of Approval PC: TBD PA 2018-49/TPM 37710/IDR 2019-01 CC: TBD Applicant’s Initials: _____ Page 6 of 18 40. House Electrical Meter. Applicant shall provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. At Plan Review Submittal 41. Submitting Plans and Calculations. Applicant must submit to Building and Safety four (4) complete sets of plans and two (2) sets of supporting calculations for review and approval including: a. An electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic, and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work. b. A Sound Transmission Control Study in accordance with the provisions of the Section 1207, of the 2019 edition of the California Building Code. c. A precise grading plan to verify accessibility for the persons with disabilities. d. Truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the building and the truss manufacturer engineer. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) 42. Onsite Water and Sewer Plans. Onsite water and sewer plans, submitted separately from the building plans, shall be submitted to Building and Safety for review and approval. 43. Demolition Permits. A demolition permit shall be obtained if there is an existing structure to be removed as part of the project. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 44. Plans Require Stamp of Registered Professional. Applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on the plans. Provide C.D. of approved plans to the Building Division. Prior to Beginning of Construction 45. Pre-Construction Meeting. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT General 46. All slopes and landscaping within public right-of-way shall be maintained by the property owner or property owner’s association or another maintenance entity approved by the City Council. All open space and slopes except for public parks and schools and flood control district facilities, outside the public right-of-way shall be owned and maintained by property owner or property owner’s association. 47. In accordance with the City’s Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the Conditions of Approval PC: TBD PA 2018-49/TPM 37710/IDR 2019-01 CC: TBD Applicant’s Initials: _____ Page 7 of 18 developer shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. 48. Developer shall mitigate to prevent any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and or diversion of drainage. 49. Any grading that affects “waters of the United States”, wetlands or jurisdictional streambeds, shall require approval and necessary permits from respective Federal and/or State agencies. 50. All required hydrology and hydraulic reports shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. All required soils, geology, and seismic reports shall be prepared by a Registered Geotechnical Engineer. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT / POLLUTION PREVENTION / NPDES Design 51. The project is responsible for complying with the Santa Ana Region NPDES Permits as warranted based on the nature of development and/or activity. These Permits include: • General Permit – Construction • Deminimus Discharges • MS4 52. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) (preliminary and final) are required and shall be prepared using the Santa Ana Region 8 approved template and guidance and submitted for review and approval to the City. 53. The Final WQMP shall be in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary WQMP and shall be approved by the City prior to precise grading plan approval and issuance of ANY permit for construction. 54. The Final WQMP shall document the following: • Detailed site and project description. • Potential stormwater pollutants. • Post-development drainage characteristics. • Low Impact Development (LID) BMP selection and analysis. • Structural and Non-Structural source control BMPs. • Treatment Control BMPs • Site design and drainage plan (BMP Exhibit). • Documentation of how vector issues are addressed in the BMP design, operation and maintenance. • GIS Decimal Minute Longitude and Latitude coordinates for all LID and Treatment Control BMP locations. • HCOC – demonstrate that discharge flow rates, velocities, duration and volume for the post construction condition from a 2 year and 10 year, 24 hour rainfall event will not cause adverse impacts on downstream erosion and receiving waters, or measures are implemented to mitigate significant adverse impacts downstream public facilities and water bodies. Evaluation documentation shall include pre-and post-development Conditions of Approval PC: TBD PA 2018-49/TPM 37710/IDR 2019-01 CC: TBD Applicant’s Initials: _____ Page 8 of 18 hydrograph volumes, time of concentration and peak discharge velocities, construction of sediment budgets, and a sediment transport analysis. • The Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan and Agreement and/or CC&R’s shall (1) describe the long-term operation and maintenance requirements for BMPs identified in the BMP Exhibit; (2) identify the entity that will be responsible for long-term operation and maintenance of the referenced BMPs; (3) describe the mechanism for funding the long-term operation and maintenance of the referenced BMPS; and (4) provide for annual certification of water quality facilities by a registered civil engineer. The City format shall be used. 55. The 2010 SAR MS4 Permit requires implementation of LID Principles and LID Site Design, where feasible, to treat the pollutants of concern identified for the project, in the following manner (from highest to lowest priority): (Section XII.E.2, XII.E3, and XII.E.7). • Preventatives measures (these are mostly non-structural measures, e.g., minimizing impervious areas, conserving natural areas, minimizing directly connected impervious areas, etc.) • The Project shall in the order presented, infiltrate, harvest and use, evapotranspire and/or bio-treat the Design Capture Volume (DCV). • The Project shall consider a properly engineered and maintained bio-treatment system only if infiltration, harvesting and use and evapotranspiration cannot be feasibly implemented at the project site. • Any portion of the DCV that is not infiltrated, harvested and used, evapo-transpired, and/or bio-treated shall be treated and discharged in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section XII.G. 56. Parking lot landscaping areas shall be designed to provide for treatment, retention or infiltration of runoff. 57. Project hardscape areas shall be designed and constructed to provide for drainage into adjacent landscape. 58. The project shall implement State Water Quality Control Board and City approved full capture trash devices. This shall include installation of connector pipe screens on all onsite catch basins and all offsite catch basins to which the project discharges. 59. Trash enclosure shall be covered and bermed to prevent discharge. 60. If CEQA identifies resources requiring Clean Water Act Section 401 Permitting, the applicant shall obtain certification through the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and provide a copy to the Engineering Division. 61. All storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately marked “Only Rain in the Storm Drain” using the City authorized marker. 62. The project shall use either volume-based and/or flow-based criteria for sizing BMPs in accordance with NPDES Permit Provision XII.D.4. Construction 63. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) (as required by the NPDES General Construction Permit) and compliance with the Green Building Code for sediment and Conditions of Approval PC: TBD PA 2018-49/TPM 37710/IDR 2019-01 CC: TBD Applicant’s Initials: _____ Page 9 of 18 erosion control are required for this project. 64. Prior to grading or building permit for construction or demolition and/or weed abatement activity projects subject to coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit shall demonstrate that compliance with the permit has been obtained by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) Number or other proof of filing to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A copy of the SWPPP shall be kept at the project site, updated, and be available for review upon request. 65. Erosion & Sediment Control - Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit for construction or demolition, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by the City Engineer, an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan as a separate sheet of the grading plan submittal to demonstrate compliance with the City’s NPDES Program and state water quality regulations for grading and construction activities. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall identify how all construction materials, wastes, grading or demolition debris, and stockpiles of soil, aggregates, soil amendments, etc. shall be property covered, stored and secured to prevent transport into local drainages or waters by wind, rain, tracking, or dispersion. The plan shall also describe how the project will ensure that all BMPs will be maintained during construction of any future right of ways. A copy of the plan shall be incorporated into the SWPPP and kept updated as needed to address changing circumstances of the project site, be kept at the project site and available for review upon request. Post-Construction 66. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of use and/or occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with applicable NPDES permits for construction, industrial/commercial, MS4, etc. to include: • Demonstrate that the project has complied with all non-structural BMPs described in the project’s WQMP. • Provide signed, notarized certification from the engineer of work that the structural BMP’s identified in the project’s WQMP are installed in conformance with approved plans and specifications and operational. • Submit a copy of the fully executed, recorded City approved Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan and Agreement for all structural BMPs or a copy of the recorded City approved CC&R. • Provide documentation of annexation into a CFD for funding of facilities to be maintained by the City. • Demonstrate that copies of the project’s approved WQMP (with recorded O&M Plan or CC&R’s attached) are available for each of the initial occupants (commercial/industrial) or POA as appropriate. • Agree to pay for a Special Investigation from the City of Lake Elsinore for a date twelve (12) months after the issuance of a Certificate of Use and/or Occupancy for the project to verify compliance with the approved WQMP and O&M Plan. A signed/sealed certification from the engineer of work dated 12 months after Certificate of Occupancy will be considered in lieu of a Special Investigation by the City. • Provide the City with a digital .pdf copy of the Final WQMP. 67. Chemical Management – Prior to the issuance of building permits for any tank or pipeline, Conditions of Approval PC: TBD PA 2018-49/TPM 37710/IDR 2019-01 CC: TBD Applicant’s Initials: _____ Page 10 of 18 the uses of said tank or pipeline shall be identified and the applicant shall submit a Chemical Management Plan in addition to a WQMP with all appropriate measures for chemical management (including, but not limited to, storage, emergency response, employee training, spill contingencies and disposal) in a manner meeting the satisfaction of the Manager, Permit Intake, in consultation with the Riverside County Fire Department and wastewater agencies, as appropriate, to ensure implementation of each agency’s respective requirements. A copy of the approved “Chemical Management Plans” shall be furnished to the Fire Marshall, prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Use and Occupancy. 68. Industrial Facilities – Subject to California’s General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity as defined by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code. • Prior to grading or building permit close-out and/or the issuance of a certificate of use and occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate that compliance with the permit has been obtained by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) Number or other proof of filing to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. FINAL TRACT OR PARCEL MAP 69. The developer shall submit for plan check review and approval a final map. 70. The final map shall reflect reciprocal easements for access purposes. 71. Prior to City Council approval of the Parcel Map, the developer shall, in accordance with Government Code, have constructed all improvements or have improvement plans submitted and approved, agreements executed and securities posted. UTILITIES 72. All arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 73. All overhead utilities shall be undergrounded in accordance with Chapter 16.64 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) 74. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City’s agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 75. The developer shall apply for, obtain and submit to the City Engineering Division a letter from Southern California Edison (SCE) indicating that the construction activity will not interfere with existing SCE facilities (aka SCE NIL). 76. The developer shall submit a copy of the "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location, such as water pressure and volume etc. IMPROVEMENTS Conditions of Approval PC: TBD PA 2018-49/TPM 37710/IDR 2019-01 CC: TBD Applicant’s Initials: _____ Page 11 of 18 Design 77. Sight distance into and out of the project location shall comply with CALTRANS Standards. 78. The developer shall install blue dot markers in the roadway at a right angle to Fire Hydrant locations per Lake Elsinore Standards. 79. The developer shall coordinate with Riverside Transit Authority for location and installation of bus transit facilities. 80. Flood control - 10 year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria are exceeded, drainage facilities shall be provided. 81. All drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 82. A drainage study shall be provided. The study shall identify the following: identify storm water runoff from and upstream of the site; show existing and proposed off-site and onsite drainage facilities; and include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of the facilities. The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that runoff from a 10-yr storm of 6 hours or 24 hours duration under developed condition is equal or less than the runoff under existing conditions of the same storm frequency. Both 6 hour and 24 hour storm duration shall be analyzed to determine the detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish the desired results. 83. All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. All off-site drainage, if different from historic flow, shall be conveyed to a public facility. 84. Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs should drain to a landscaped area. 85. The site shall be planned and developed to keep surface water from entering buildings (California Green Building Standards Code 4.106.3). 86. All existing storm drain inlet facilities adjacent to the subject properties shall be retrofitted with a storm drain filter; all new storm drain inlet facilities constructed by this project shall include a storm drain filter. 87. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and Lake Elsinore Public Works Standard Plans. 88. The owner shall dedicate in fee title to the City right-of-way along Chaney Street adjacent to the property frontage for a total right-of-way of 50’ wide from centerline to the project property line. 89. The owner shall dedicate in fee title to the City right-of-way along Minthorn Street adjacent to the property frontage for a total right-of-way of 30’ wide from centerline to the project Conditions of Approval PC: TBD PA 2018-49/TPM 37710/IDR 2019-01 CC: TBD Applicant’s Initials: _____ Page 12 of 18 property line. 90. The developer shall construct half width street improvements on Chaney Street such that the ultimate right-of-way width conforms to the General Plan Circulation Element right-of- way cross sections. The cross section of roadway improvements with a striped median, curb, gutter, sidewalk, asphalt, parkway and street lights, shall be consistent with other development on Chaney Street, as recommended by the City. The road improvements for Chaney Street shall be consistent with the Traffic Analysis (revised) dated July 29, 2019. Chaney Street improvements associated with the Pennington Industrial Development shall be eligible for TIF credits within the program criteria. This includes the widening of the Roadway only. The pavement section, curb and gutter are eligible for TIF credit/reimbursement (pavement, $30/lf x 440 lf plus contingencies [estimated at $17,820]). TIF reimbursement is made with appropriate statements of work and invoices and are subject to applicable State and Local laws. Note that work related to landscape, sidewalk, etc., is not eligible for TIF credits. 91. The developer shall construct half width street improvements on Minthorn Street such that the ultimate right-of-way width conforms to the General Plan Circulation Element right-of- way cross sections. The cross section of roadway improvements with curb, gutter, sidewalk, asphalt, parkway and street lights, shall be consistent with other development on Minthorn Street, as recommended by the City. The road improvements for Minthorn Street shall be consistent with the Traffic Analysis (revised) dated July 29, 2019. 92. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and the plans shall include curb and gutter, sidewalk, ac pavement, street lighting, median, and drainage improvements. 93. If existing improvements are to be modified, the existing improvement plans on file shall be modified accordingly and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit. Permitting/Construction 94. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work on City and/or State right-of- way. The developer shall submit the permit application, required fees and executed agreements, security and other required documentation prior to issuance. 95. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 ½" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 96. All streets shall be constructed per Lake Elsinore City Standards and/or applicable specific plan. Any deviation from City standards shall be approved by the City Engineer. Acceptance of Improvements 97. The developer shall submit a written request for acceptance to the City Engineer. 98. As-built plans shall be completed and signed by the City Engineer. GRADING Design Conditions of Approval PC: TBD PA 2018-49/TPM 37710/IDR 2019-01 CC: TBD Applicant’s Initials: _____ Page 13 of 18 99. A grading plan signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted for City review and approval for all addition and/or movement of soil (grading) on the site. The plan shall include separate sheets for erosion control, haul route and traffic control. The grading submittal shall include all supporting documentation and be prepared using City standard title block, standard drawings and design manual (available at www.lake-elsinore.org). 100. All grading plan contours shall extend to minimum of 50 feet beyond property lines to indicate existing drainage pattern. 101. The grading plan shall show that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are located near the project entrances that could reduce sight distance. 102. Plant and irrigate all manufactured slopes equal to or greater than 3 feet in vertical height with drought tolerant grass or ground cover; slopes 15 feet or greater in vertical height shall also be planted with drought tolerant shrubs or trees in accordance with the requirements of Ordinance 457. 103. If the grading plan identifies alterations in the existing drainage patterns as they exit the site, a Hydrology and Hydraulic Report for review and approval by City Engineer shall be required prior to issuance of grading permits. All grading that modifies the existing flow patterns and/or topography shall be approved by the City Engineer. 104. The developer shall obtain all necessary off-site easements and/or permits for off-site grading and the applicant shall accept drainage from the adjacent property owners. Permit/Construction: 105. Developer shall execute and submit grading and erosion control agreement, post grading security and pay permit fees as a condition of grading permit issuance. 106. A preconstruction meeting with the City Public Works Inspector (Engineering Division) is required prior to commencement of ANY grading activity. 107. Developer shall provide the city with a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) and Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) letter issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program 108. Prior to commencement of grading operations, developer is to provide to the City with a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of import/export material. All such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Haul route shall be submitted prior to issuance of a grading permit. Hauling in excess of 5,000 cy shall be approved by City Council. (LEMC 15.72.065) 109. Import/Export sites located within the Lake Elsinore City limits must have an active grading permit. 110. Applicant to provide to the City a video record of the condition of all proposed public City haul roads. In the event of damage to such roads, applicant shall pay full cost of restoring public roads to the baseline condition. A bond may be required to ensure payment of Conditions of Approval PC: TBD PA 2018-49/TPM 37710/IDR 2019-01 CC: TBD Applicant’s Initials: _____ Page 14 of 18 damages to the public right-of-way, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 111. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer. Slopes steeper than 2 to 1 shall be evaluated for stability and proper erosion control and approved by the City. 112. A copy of the current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for review upon request. 113. Approval of the project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post construction shall be received prior to issuance of a grading permit. 114. Submit an approved environmental clearance document to the Engineering Division. This approval shall identify and clear all proposed grading activity anticipated for this project. 115. Developer shall pay all grading permit applicable processing, permit, security and development fees including Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT 116. Provide final soils and geology report, including recommendations for parameters for seismic design of buildings, and walls prior to building permit. 117. The developer shall participate in “fair share” payment of offsite improvements as described in Table 4 of the Traffic Analysis dated July 29, 2019. 118. The Parcel Map shall be recorded. 119. All street improvement plans and signing and striping plans shall be completed and approved by the City Engineer. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY 120. All signing and striping and traffic control devices for the required improvements of this development shall be installed. 121. All public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans or as condition of this development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 122. The Project CC&R’s shall be recorded. 123. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the Developer shall pay their,“fair share” payment for traffic signal at the intersection of Collier and Chaney streets as described in Table 4 of the Traffic Analysis dated July 29, 2019 and depicted in Table - 1. Table – 1 Chaney at Collier Intersection, per TIF Study: Improvements $125,000 10% Supplemental work $12,500 10% Mobilization $12,500 20 % Contingencies 25,000 Conditions of Approval PC: TBD PA 2018-49/TPM 37710/IDR 2019-01 CC: TBD Applicant’s Initials: _____ Page 15 of 18 Total $175,000 Project’s “Fair Share” $17,850 The Developer may elect to make the signing and striping improvements of a left turn pocket from northbound Collier Avenue onto Chaney Street prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. If not elected, the Developer shall deposit $17,500 to offset the City’s cost of the signing and striping, satisfying this condition of approval. 124. All water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with Water District requirements. 125. Proof of acceptance of maintenance responsibility of slopes, open spaces, landscape areas, and drainage facilities shall be provided. 126. As-built plans for all approved plan sets shall be submitted for review and approval by the City. As-built plans are required as a function of project closeout. 127. In the event of damage to City roads from hauling or other construction related activity, applicant shall pay full cost of restoring public roads to the baseline condition. 128. All final studies and reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 ½ x 11” mylar) shall be submitted in .tif format on a CD/DVD. Studies and reports include, Soils, Seismic, Hydrology, Hydraulics, Grading, SWPPP, WQMP, etc. 129. All plan sets and recorded maps shall be digitized and provided on CD/DVD as follows: • Final Map(s) - GIS Shape files* and .tif of recorded map. • Improvement Plans – GIS Shape files* and .tif of approved as built mylar. • Grading Plans - .tif of approved as built mylar. *GIS Shape files must be in projected Coordinate System: NAD 83 State Plane California Zone VI U.S. Fleet. 130. Documentation of responsibility for maintenance along right-of-ways and open spaces to be maintained by the POA or other entity shall be provided in a recordable format and recorded prior to occupancy/final. 131. All street improvements including signing and striping onsite and project adjacent sections of Chaney and Minthorn Streets shall be installed. 132. Prior to grading or building permit close-out and/or the issuance of a certificate of use or a certificate of occupancy, developer shall: o Demonstrate that all structural BMPs have been constructed, installed and are functioning in conformance with approved plans and specifications and the WQMP through completion of City’s Water Quality Certification Form; o Demonstrate that they are prepared to implement all non-structural BMPs included in the conditions of approval or building/grading permit conditions; o Demonstrate that an adequate number of copies of the approved project specific WQMP are available for the future owners/occupants; and o The developer shall provide all education guidelines for Water Quality Management Practices to the tenants, operators and owners of the businesses of the development, Conditions of Approval PC: TBD PA 2018-49/TPM 37710/IDR 2019-01 CC: TBD Applicant’s Initials: _____ Page 16 of 18 regarding the environmental awareness on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the approved WQMP in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. Contact the City NPDES Coordinator for handout/guideline information. 133. Chemical management plans shall be approved by the County/City and other appropriate agencies such as County/City Fire Department, the Health Services Agency’s Department of Environmental Health, and sewering and/or water agencies to ensure implementation of each agency’s respective requirements. Approval by the appropriate agencies shall be furnished to the Engineering Division, prior to the issuance of any certificates of use and/or occupancy. 134. Prior to issuance of certificates of use and occupancy or building permits for individual tenant improvements or construction permits for a tank or pipeline, uses shall be identified and, for specified uses (where the proposed improvements will store, generate or handle hazardous materials in quantities that will require permitting and inspection once operational), the developer shall propose plans and measures for chemical management (including, but not limited to, storage, emergency response, employee training, spill contingencies and disposal) to the satisfaction of the City Building Official. 135. Certificates or permits may be ministerially withheld if features needed to properly manage chemicals cannot be incorporated into a previously completed building, center, or complex. 136. The property owner (aka Legally Responsible Party) shall execute and cause to be recorded a “Covenant and Agreement” in the form provided by the City to inform future property owners of the requirement to implement the approved final project-specific WQMP. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE FIRE MARSHAL 137. The applicant/operator shall comply with all requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department Lake Elsinore Office of the Fire Marshal. Questions should be directed to the Riverside County Fire Department, Lake Elsinore Office of the Fire Marshal at 130 S. Main St., Lake Elsinore, CA 92530. Phone: (951) 671-3124 Ext. 225. 138. Gates: Gates must meet Fire Department standards at the time of building permit issuance. Current standards require gates be set back 35 feet from roadways, equipped with a Knox Rapid Entry System, and an infrared automatic gate opener. 139. Fire flow and hydrants: The applicant or developer shall provide fire hydrants in accordance with the following: a. Prior to placing any combustibles on site, provide an approved water source for firefighting purposes. b. Prior to building permit issuance, submit plans to the water district for a water system capable of delivering fire flow as required by the California Fire Code and Fire Department standards. Fire hydrants shall be spaced in accordance with the California Fire Code. Based on current standards, the required fire flow is estimated to be 2,625 GPM at 20 PSI for a 2 hour duration. Estimated fire flow is based on 39,000 square foot building area, Type V-B construction, and buildings having a fire sprinkler system per 2016 California Fire Code. Conditions of Approval PC: TBD PA 2018-49/TPM 37710/IDR 2019-01 CC: TBD Applicant’s Initials: _____ Page 17 of 18 140. Prior to building permit issuance, install the approved water system, approved access roads, and contact the Fire Department for a verification inspection. 141. Emergency access roads must meet fire department standards at the time of building permit application. Current standards require minimum 24-foot wide roads for buildings less than 30 feet tall, and minimum 30-foot wide roads for buildings 30 feet tall and higher. Roads must be capable of supporting at least 80,000 pounds. DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Annex into the City of Lake Elsinore Community Facilities District No. 2015-2 (Maintenance Services) 142. Prior to recordation of a Final Map, the applicant shall annex into the Community Facilities District No. 2015-2 (Maintenance Services) or current Community Facilities District in place at the time of annexation to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of the public right- of-way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public right-of-way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison, including parkways, street maintenance, open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project. Alternatively, the applicant may propose alternative financing mechanisms to fund the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project with respect to Maintenance Services. Applicant shall make a non-refundable deposit of $15,000 or at the current rate in place at the time of annexation toward the cost of annexation, formation or other mitigation process, as applicable. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 143. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program for the Mitigated Negative Declaration (Environmental Review No. 2019-03; SCH # 2019129075) prepared for the Project. Conditions of Approval PC: TBD PA 2018-49/TPM 37710/IDR 2019-01 CC: TBD Applicant’s Initials: _____ Page 18 of 18 I hereby state that I acknowledge receipt of the approved Conditions of Approval for the above named project and do hereby agree to accept and abide by all Conditions of Approval as approved by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore on _________. I also acknowledge that all Conditions shall be met as indicated. Date: Applicant’s Signature: Print Name: Address: Phone Number: Exhibit A Fee Payment Milestone Area Drainage (Warm Springs East District) Final Map Approval or Building Permit Issuance, whichever occurs first Building Permit Building Permit Issuance Development Impact Fees (DIF) Building Permit Issuance Animal shelter facilities Building Permit Issuance City Hall and public works facilities Building Permit Issuance Community center facilities Building Permit Issuance Fire Facilities Fees Building Permit Issuance Lakeside Facilities Fees Building Permit Issuance Traffic Infrastructure Fees (TIF) Building Permit Issuance Grading Permit & Fee post grading security Grading Permit Issuance MSHCP Building or Grading Permit Issuance, whichever occurs first School Mitigation Fees Building Permit Issuance Stevens Kangaroo Rat Grading Permit Issuance Transportation Uniform Mitigation (TUMF) Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or Final Inspection, whichever occurs first CITY OF LADE LS ORE DREAM EXTREME PENNINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 2018-49 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 37710 INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2019-01 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW NO. 2019-03 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION) Prepared By: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Applicant: FAIRWAY COMMERCIAL PARTNERS Rod Oshita 1601 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 401 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 December 2019 Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 1 of 109 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 2 of 109 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................4 A. PURPOSE...............................................................................................................................................5 B.CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.......................................................................................5 C. INTENDED USES OF INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION...................................6 D. CONTENTS OF INITIAL STUDY...............................................................................................................6 E.SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS.................................................................................................7 F. TIERED DOCUMENTS, I NCO RPORATION BY REFERENCE,AND TECHNICAL STUD I ES............................8 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................................12 A. PROJECT LOCATION AND SETTING......................................................................................................12 B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION........................................................................................................................18 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST................................................................................................................34 A. BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................34 B. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED........................................................................36 C. DETERMINATION................................................................................................................................36 D. INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST...................................................................................................................37 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS..................................................................................................................45 I.AESTHETICS..........................................................................................................................................45 II.AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES........................................................................................47 III.AIR QUALITY.......................................................................................................................................49 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ...................................................................................................................59 V.CULTURAL RESOURCES.......................................................................................................................62 VI. ENERGY..............................................................................................................................................65 VII.GEOLOGY AND SOILS. .......................................................................................................................66 VIII.GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ........................................................................................................73 IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS...........................................................................................75 X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY....................................................................................................78 XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING.................................................................................................................84 XII. MINERAL RESOURCES.......................................................................................................................85 XIII. NOISE ...............................................................................................................................................86 XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING...........................................................................................................90 XV. PUBLIC SERVICES...............................................................................................................................91 XVI. RECREATION ....................................................................................................................................94 XVI I.TRANSPORTATION..........................................................................................................................95 XVIII.TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES....................................................................................................100 XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS...................................................................................................102 XX.WILDFIRES.......................................................................................................................................104 V. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE...........................................................................................104 VI. PERSONS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONSULTED.....................................................................................107 VII. REFERENCES........................................................................................................................................107 Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 3 of 109 Figures Figure1 —Vicinity Map ................................................................................................................. 14 Figure2 — Project Site................................................................................................................... 16 Figure3 —Site Plan....................................................................................................................... 20 Figure 4 —Tentative Parcel Map.................................................................................................. 22 Figure 5 —Conceptual Grading Plan.............................................................................................. 24 Figure 6— Elevations Building 1.................................................................................................... 26 Figure 7 — Elevations Building 2.................................................................................................... 28 Figure 8— Elevations Building 3 .................................................................................................... 30 Figure 9 — Conceptual Landscape Plan ........................................................................................ 32 Tables Table 1: On-site and Adjacent Land Use....................................................................................... 12 Table 2: Overall Construction Emissions Summary...................................................................... 53 Table 3: Summary of Operational Emissions................................................................................ 55 Table 4: Localized Significance Summary of Construction ........................................................... 57 Table 5: Localized Significance Summary of Operations.............................................................. 58 Table 6: Project GHG Emissions.................................................................................................... 73 Table 7: Unmitigated Operational Noise Level Compliance......................................................... 86 Table 8: Unmitigated Construction Equipment Noise Level Summary........................................ 87 Table 9: Unmitigated Construction Equipment Noise Level Compliance..................................... 88 Table 10: Mitigated Grading Equipment Noise Levels ................................................................. 88 Table 11: Unmitigated Construction Equipment Vibration Levels ............................................... 89 Table 12: Mitigated Construction Equipment Vibration Levels.................................................... 90 Table 13: Project Trip Generation Summary (06/17/2019).......................................................... 96 Table 14: Collier Avenue (NS) / Chaney Street (EW) Intersection Analysis Results ..................... 97 Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 4 of 109 I. INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE This document is an Initial Study for evaluation of environmental impacts resulting from implementation of Pennington Industrial Project. For purposes of this document, this application will be called the "proposed project". B. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT As defined by Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, an Initial Study is prepared primarily to provide the Lead Agency with information to use as the basis for determining whether an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or Mitigated Negative Declaration would be appropriate for providing the necessary environmental documentation and clearance for any proposed project. According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15065, an EIR is deemed appropriate for a particular proposal if the following conditions occur: ➢ The project has the potential to: substantially degrade the quality of the environment; substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species; cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels; threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of an endangered, rare or threatened species; or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. ➢ The project has the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. ➢ The project has possible environmental effects that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. ➢ The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. According to CEQA Section 21080(c)(1) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15070(a), a Negative Declaration can be adopted if it can be determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. According to CEQA Section 21080(c)(2) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15070(b), a Mitigated Negative Declaration can be adopted if it is determined that although the Initial Study identifies that the project may have potentially significant effects on the environment, revisions in the project plans and/or mitigation measures, which would avoid or mitigate the effects to below the level of significance, have been made or agreed to by the applicant. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 5 of 109 This Initial Study has determined that the proposed project may result in potentially significant environmental effects but that said effects can be reduced to below the level of significance through the implementation of mitigation measures and therefore,a Mitigated Negative Declaration is deemed the appropriate document to provide the necessary environmental evaluations and clearance. This Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration are prepared in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 , as amended (Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et seq.); the State Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA Guidelines"), as amended (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Section 15000, et seq.); applicable requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore; and the regulations, requirements, and procedures of any other responsible public agency or agency with jurisdiction by law. The City of Lake Elsinore is designated the Lead Agency, in accordance with Section 15050 of the CEQA Guidelines. The Lead Agency is the public agency which has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a project which may have significant effects upon the environment. C. INTENDED USES OF INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION This Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration are informational documents which are intended to inform the City of Lake Elsinore decision-makers, other responsible or interested agencies, and the general public of the potential environmental effects of the proposed project. The environmental review process has been established to enable public agencies to evaluate environmental consequences and to examine and implement methods of eliminating or reducing any potentially adverse impacts. While CEQA requires that consideration be given to avoiding environmental damage, the Lead Agency and other responsible agencies must balance adverse environmental effects against other public objectives, including economic and social goals (CEQA Guidelines Section 15021). The City of Lake Elsinore City Council, as Lead Agency, has determined that environmental clearance for the proposed project can be provided with a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Initial Study and Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt prepared for the Mitigated Negative Declaration will be circulated for a period of 30 days for public and agency review. Comments received on the document will be considered by the Lead Agency before it acts on the proposed project. D. CONTENTS OF INITIAL STUDY This Initial Study is organized to facilitate a basic understanding of the existing setting and environmental implications of the proposed project. I. INTRODUCTION presents an introduction to the entire report. This section identifies City Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 6 of 109 of Lake Elsinore contact persons involved in the process, scope of environmental review, environmental procedures, and incorporation by reference documents. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION describes the proposed project. A description of discretionary approvals and permits required for project implementation is also included. III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM contains the City's Environmental Checklist Form. The checklist form presents results of the environmental evaluation for the proposed project and those areas that would have either a potentially significant impact, a less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated, a less than significant impact, or no impact. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS provides the background analysis supporting each response provided in the environmental checklist form. Each response checked in the checklist form is discussed and supported with sufficient data and analysis. As appropriate, each response discussion describes and identifies specific impacts anticipated with project implementation. In this section, mitigation measures are also set forth, as appropriate, that would reduce potentially significant adverse impacts to levels of less than significance. V. MANDATORY FINDINGS presents the background analysis supporting each response provided in the environmental checklist form for the Mandatory Findings of Significance set forth in Section 21083(b) of CEQA and Section 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines. VI. PERSONS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONSULTED identifies those individuals consulted and involved in the preparation of this Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. VII. REFERENCES lists bibliographical materials used in preparation of this document. E. SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS For evaluation of environmental impacts, each question from the Environmental Checklist Form is stated and responses are provided according to the analysis undertaken as part of the Initial Study. All responses will take into account the whole action involved, including offsite as well as onsite, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. Project impacts and effects will be evaluated and quantified, when appropriate. To each question, there are four possible responses, including: 1. No Impact: A "No Impact" response is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to the proposed project. A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project- specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2. Less Than Significant Impact: Development associated with project implementation Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 7 of 109 will have the potential to impact the environment. These impacts, however, will be less than the levels of thresholds that are considered significant and no additional analysis is required. 3. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated:This applies where incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact". The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. 4. Potentially Significant Impact: There is substantial evidence that the proposed project may have impacts that are considered potentially significant and an EIR is required. F. TIERED DOCUMENTS, INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE,AND TECHNICAL STUDIES Information, findings, and conclusions contained in this document are based on the incorporation by reference of tiered documentation and technical studies that have been prepared for the proposed project which are discussed in the following section. 1. Tiered Documents As permitted in CEQA Guidelines Section 15152(a)the analysis of general matters contained in a broader EIR (such as one prepared for a general plan or policy statement) with later EIRs and negative declarations on narrower projects; incorporating by reference the general discussions from the broader EIR; and concentrating the later EIR or negative declaration solely on the issues specific to the later project. Tiering is defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15385 as follows: "Tiering" refers to the coverage of general matters in broader EIRs (such as on general plans or policy statements) with subsequent narrower EIRs or ultimately site-specific EIRs incorporating by reference the general discussions and concentrating solely on the issues specific to the EIR subsequently prepared. Tiering is appropriate when the sequence of EIRs is: (a) From a general plan, policy, or program EIR to a program, plan, or policy EIR of lesser scope or to a site-specific EIR; (b) From an EIR on a specific action at an early stage to a subsequent EIR or a supplement to an EIR at a later stage. Tiering in such cases is appropriate when it helps the Lead Agency to focus on the issues which are ripe for decision and exclude from consideration issues already decided or not yet ripe. Tiering also allows this document to comply with Section 15152(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, which discourages repetitive analyses, as follows: Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 8 of 109 "Agencies are encouraged to tier the environmental analyses which they prepare for separate but related projects including general plans, zoning changes, and development projects. This approach can eliminate repetitive discussions of the same issues and focus the later EIR or negative declaration on the actual issues ripe for decision at each level of environmental review. Tiering is appropriate when the sequence of analysis is from an EIR prepared for a general plan, policy or program to an EIR or negative declaration for another plan, policy, or program of lesser scope, or to a site-specific EIR or negative declaration." Further, Section 15152(d) of the CEQA Guidelines states: "Where an EIR has been prepared and certified for a program, plan, policy, or ordinance consistent with the requirements of this section, any lead agency for a later project pursuant to or consistent with the program, plan, policy, or ordinance should limit the EIR or negative declaration on the later project to effects which: (1) Were not examined as significant effects on the environment in the prior EIR; or (2) Are susceptible to substantial reduction or avoidance by the choice of specific revisions in the project, by the imposition of conditions or other means." For this document, the "City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report" certified December 13, 2011 (SCH#2005121019)serves as the broader document, since it analyzes the entire City area, which includes the proposed project site. However, as discussed, site-specific impacts, which the broader document (City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report) cannot adequately address, may occur for certain issue areas. This document, therefore, evaluates each environmental issue alone and will rely upon the analysis contained within the Lake Elsinore General Plan Final EIR with respect to remaining issue areas. 2. Incorporation by Reference An EIR or Negative Declaration may incorporate by reference all or portions of another document which is a matter of public record or is generally available to the public. Where all or part of another document is incorporated by reference, the incorporated language shall be considered to be set forth in full as part of the text of the EIR or Negative Declaration. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15150[a]) Incorporation by reference is a procedure for reducing the size of EIRs/MND and is most appropriate for including long, descriptive, or technical materials that provide general background information, but do not contribute directly to the specific analysis of the project itself. This procedure is particularly useful when an EIR or Negative Declaration relies on a broadly-drafted EIR for its evaluation of cumulative impacts of related projects (Las Virgenes Homeowners Federation v. County of Los Angeles [1986, 177 Ca.3d 300]). If an EIR or Negative Declaration relies on information from a supporting study that is available to the public, the EIR or Negative Declaration cannot be deemed unsupported by evidence or analysis (San Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 9 of 109 Francisco Ecology Center v. City and County of San Francisco [1975, 48 Ca.3d 584, 595]). When an EIR or Negative Declaration incorporates a document by reference, the incorporation must comply with CEQA Guidelines Section 15150 as follows: ➢ Where part of another document is incorporated by reference, such other document shall be made available to the public for inspection at a public place or public building. The EIR or Negative Declaration shall state where the incorporated documents will be available for inspection. At a minimum, the incorporated document shall be made available to the public in an office of the Lead Agency. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15150[b]) ➢ The incorporated part of the referenced document shall be briefly summarized where possible or briefly described if the data or information cannot be summarized. The relationship between the incorporated part of the referenced document and the EIR shall be described. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15150[c]) ➢ This document must include the State identification number of the incorporated document (CEQA Guidelines Section 15150[d]). 3. Documents Incorporated by Reference/Technical Studies a. The following document(s) is/are incorporated by reference: • City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report ("General Plan EIR") (SCH #2005121019), certified December 13, 2011. The General Plan EIR, from which this document is tiered, addresses the entire City of Lake Elsinore and provides background and inventory information and data which apply to the project site. Incorporated information and/or data will be cited in the appropriate sections. b. Various technical reports have been prepared to assess specific issues that may result from the construction and operation of the proposed project. As relevant, information from these technical reports has been incorporated into the Initial Study.The following technical reports are included as appendices to this Initial Study: • Appendix A - Air Quality Impact Analysis, Pennington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, prepared by Urban Crossroads, dated July 10, 2019 • Appendix B — Cultural Resources Inventory for the Pennington Project, Lake Elsinore, California, prepared by DUDEK, dated November 4, 2019 • Appendix C — Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report Proposed Commercial Development,Assessor's Parcel Number 377-160-014, South Corner of Chaney& West Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 10 of 109 Minthorn Streets, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California, prepared by CW Soils, dated February 27, 2019 • Appendix D - Environmental Site Assessment - Phase 1, Undeveloped Property, APN: 377-160-014, Southern corner of West Minthorn Street and Chaney Street, Lake Elsinore, California 92530, prepared by California Environmental, dated July 2018 • Appendix E — Preliminary Drainage Report for Pennington Industrial, South Corner of Chaney & West Minthorn Streets, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California, prepared by SB&O Inc., dated May 17, 2019 • Appendix F - Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, Pennington Industrial Park, prepared by SB&O Inc., dated February 27, 2019 (Revised May 17, 2019) • Appendix G - Noise Impact Analysis, Pennington Industrial, City of Lake Elsinore, prepared by Urban Crossroads, dated July 23, 2019 • Appendix H — Greenhous Gas Analysis, Pennington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, prepared by Urban Crossroads, dated July 10, 2019 • Appendix I — Focused Traffic Evaluation, Pennington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, prepared by Urban Crossroads, dated July 29, 2019 • Appendix J -Service Planning Letter#3223-0, Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, May 20, 2019 c. The above-listed documents and technical studies are available for review at: City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92530 Hours: Mon-Thurs: 8 a.m. - 5 p.m. Friday: 8 a.m. -4 p.m. Closed Holidays Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 11 of 109 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. PROJECT LOCATION AND SETTING Development of the Pennington Industrial project (Project) would occur on a currently undeveloped site located at the southeasterly corner of Chaney Street and Minthorn Street in the City of Lake Elsinore (City) (Figure 1, Vicinity Map and Figure 2, Project Site). The approximately 5.01 acre' Project site is located within Section 31, Township 5 South, Range 4 West as shown on the Elsinore, California 7.5 minute U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) topographic map. The subject property is relatively flat. The topographic elevation of the subject property ranges from approximately 1,282 to 1,285 feet above mean sea level. The Project site is bounded by commercial and industrial land uses to the north and west, Lake Elsinore Unified School District and Ortega High School to the south, and Government offices to the east. Table 1, On-site and Adjacent Land Use, summarizes on-site and adjacent land use while Figure 1 illustrates project location and Figure 2 shows the existing site condition. Table 1: On-site and Adjacent Land Use Land Use General Plan Zoning On-site Undeveloped Limited Industrial (LI) Limited Manufacturing(M-1) North Industrial Limited Industrial (LI) Limited Manufacturing(M-1) South School District Public Institutional (PI) Public Institutional (PI) East Government Offices Limited Industrial (LI) Limited Manufacturing(M-1) West Commercial Limited Industrial (LI) Commercial Manufacturing(C-M) 1 Assessor Parcel No.377-160-014 Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 12 of 109 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 13 of 109 Figure 1—Vicinity Map CL z i RS. a a E 5 E Y A � x W u+ H U 0 e �u5 u C) Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 14 of 109 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 15 of 109 Figure 2— Project Site Pao r T� � e tir A9- . t rk y� x� W Y iF. R• f Sf4 r, Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 16 of 109 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 17 of 109 B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Proposed Project consists of applications for a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM No. 37710) and Industrial Design Review(IDR No. 2019-01)which collectively are being processed under Planning Application No. 2018-49. TPM No. 37710 is proposing to subdivide the 5.01 gross acre site into three (3) parcels that are 1.06 acres, 1.72 acres, and 2.01 acres, respectively (Figure 4,Tentative Parcel Map). IDR No. 2019-01 is proposing to construct three (3) industrial buildings that are 91,140 square foot (SF) in total with 167 parking spaces (Figure 3,Site Plan). Building 1 will have 32,940 SF gross floor area, Building 2 will have 39,000 SF gross floor area, and Building 3 will have 19,200 SF gloss floor area. Each building will consist of a planned open warehouse with truck access doors and a planned office area with mezzanine level.The Proposed Project would have a 0.44 floor area ratio (FAR) and 41 percent lot coverage. The maximum height of the buildings would be 30 feet. Hardscape, landscape, on-site stormwater management improvements, trash enclosure, and area lighting would be constructed as part of the Proposed Project. It is anticipated that preparation of the site for construction will not require the import or export of soil from the Project site. Grading plans for the Project will be reviewed and approved by the City prior to the issuance of grading permits. All grading plans and activities will conform to the City grading ordinance and dust and erosion control requirements. The opening year for the project is anticipated to be 2021 and will take approximately 12 months to construct. There is an on-site man-made detention basin on the northeast corner of the site which will be removed during construction and replaced with on-site catch basins. Two access driveways are proposed: (1) the northerly driveway to W. Minthorn Street, located 320 feet (curb return-to-curb return) east of Chaney Street, and (2)the westerly driveway located south of W. Minthorn Street, opposite the driveway of the adjacent property. Proposed Improvements Off-site improvements include streets, streetlights, striping, and connection to sewer, water, and utilities. On-site improvements include drainage, sewer, water, utilities, and grading. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 18 of 109 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 19 of 109 Figure 3 —Site Plan W WNTI IORN STREET LANMWE ei IW 24 L 30 ?9 BLDG 3 L05 CUK HOT.5 39,0W 7 mAict 2E, RECL 22 STALLS PKM'ss STALLS 4" kl4 0 STALLS PROV:0 STALLS 0 w 4C LANDSCApf7 X TURE CEDIUMION t LANDSCAPE BLDG 1 OF .30.M 3F W=kaxac SF 5F GR= +GT 26 A A A MQ WVULLS PROV:64 STALLS 276 EXISTING SCREEN WALL Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 20 of 109 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 21 of 109 Figure 4 —Tentative Parcel Map 14 0 RIP tit U-1 4 � - AEL � S Y Id O y g V ti z U � U I I I I II � � I � I I I f • o ��� �� -! � e - . .. p — t ktt I I _ - .x uli.I r: S 3'..�u?L Y 4R fm..4w LSw7_ i5~ G "e.,.dilrz 4- ALL,— iz Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 22 of 109 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 23 of 109 Figure 5—Conceptual Grading Plan _ tip NJ; E RN � Y 44 a TIE HICK tid w + I I I I ❑ � r I I III fl I ii � � �i I I ¢I � i �� �(. 1 r. rm awaxc awsa3 N J III- .� �'"$ ��� � zre� o + �� `� I� hZ I kd fi:� w boo uanm91 I �:3 muay.m as E` ..k R@ w g n K" Ce9i.. I. R.-+ �• 1 I ear SIi " "r� r Aa au.ar..3----' .rae� �� ...�'�sxaa .xn•�v^ry is�� �� � — -- �� Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 24 of 109 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 25 of 109 Figure 6— Elevations Building 1 1 ti r t - L. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 26 of 109 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 27 of 109 r M -7B This Page Intentionally Left Blank Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 29 of 109 Figure 8— Elevations Building 3 r 5i} r i i i i i r 1 4 Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 30 of 109 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 31 of 109 Figure 9 —Conceptual Landscape Plan a {u ww g g w a da goo* 0 All ' I j — � L k i r1 G o 0 1. r � w 17 UJ a 4 . � I 1 I\ 1 ,,1 z ' 0 b b ° 1 + 5}, _ 0 ',; ' — m Cy ` \ 1 m O r d", � � l Ja yp UAHIS AANVHO Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 32 of 109 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 33 of 109 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Project Title: Pennington Industrial 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Lake Elsinore, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Damaris Abraham, Senior Planner (951) 674-3124 4. Project Location: : Undeveloped site located at the southeasterly corner of Chaney Street and Minthorn Street in the City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside;Assessor's Parcel Number [APN] 377-160-014. S. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Fairway Commercial Partners, Inc. Rod Oshita 1601 N. Sepulveda Blvd., #401 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 6. General Plan Designation: Limited Industrial (LI) 7. Zoning: Limited Manufacturing (M-1) 8. Description of Project: TPM No. 37710 is proposing to subdivide the 5.01 gross acre site into three(3) parcels that are 1.06 acres, 1.72 acres, and 2.01 acres, respectively. IDR No. 2019- 01 is proposing to construct three (3) industrial buildings that are 91,140 square foot (SF) in total with 167 parking spaces. The Proposed Project would have a 0.44 floor area ratio (FAR) and 41 percent lot coverage. The maximum height of the buildings would be 30 feet. Hardscape, landscape, on-site stormwater management improvements, trash enclosure, and area lighting would be constructed as part of the Proposed Project. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The property consists of one (1) square shaped parcel of land that encompasses approximately 5.01 acres. The Project site is currently vacant with construction materials debris pile observed in the south corner of the site. The Project site is bounded by commercial and industrial land uses to the north and west, Lake Elsinore Unified School District and Ortega High School to the south, and Government offices to the east. 10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required: None 11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.?: In accordance with the requirements of Assembly Bill (AB) 52, the City sent notifications to six Native American Tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area on August 28, 2019. Of the tribes notified,the Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians,the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians, and the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians requested formal government-to- Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 34 of 109 government consultation under AB 52. Consultation was concluded on November 8, 2019 with Rincon and on December 13, 2019 with both Pechanga and Soboba. Due to the level of disturbance at the project site, it is very unlikely that intact archaeological resources are still present subsurface. No cultural resources have been recorded within the project site, and no resources were identified during the pedestrian survey. Standard mitigation measures have been added to address the unanticipated discovery of cultural resources and human remains during groundbreaking activities. Please see Section XVIII of the Initial Study Environmental Checklist for more detail. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 35 of 109 B. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at a C c t �it�T�d�fY�"ai��"Pt����51�dY1y 5i�ni(ILaift-Tr"rtpacl;asindi�a'ted_Y�y.the cFi�ck�isi onutlie following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agricultural and Forestry ❑ Air Quality Resources ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Energy Greenhouse Gas Hazards & Hazardous ❑ Geology/Soils ❑ ❑ Emissions Materials Hydrology/Water El Quality Land Use/Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise U Population/Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation ❑ Tribal Cultural Resources ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Wildfire ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance C. DETERMINATION ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or"potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. 12/19/2019 Damaris Abraham, Senior Planner Date Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISAIIND (ER 2019-03) Page 36 of 109 D. INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated I.AESTHETICS. Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099,would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic ❑ ❑ ® ❑ vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to,trees, rock outcroppings,and ❑ ❑ ® ❑ historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) In non-urbanized areas,substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly ❑ ❑ ® ❑ accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area,would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime ❑ ❑ ® ❑ views in the area? II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model(1997)prepared by the California Dept.of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance(Farmland),as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the ❑ ❑ ❑ Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, ❑ ❑ ❑ or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for,or cause rezoning of,forest land (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526),or timberland ❑ ❑ ❑ zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of ❑ ❑ ❑ forest land to non-forest uses? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which,due to their location or nature, could ❑ ❑ ❑ result in conversion of Farmland to non- agricultural use? Pennington Industrial Project Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 37 of 109 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated III. AIR QUALITY. Where available,significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ applicable air quality plan? b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project ❑ ❑ ® ❑ region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial ❑ ❑ ® ❑ pollutant concentrations? d) Result in other emissions(such as those leading to odors)adversely affecting a substantial ❑ ❑ ® ❑ number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect,either directly or through habitat modifications,on any species identified as a candidate,sensitive,or special ❑ ® ❑ ❑ status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, ❑ ❑ ® ❑ regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands(including, but not limited to, marsh,vernal pool, coastal,etc.) ❑ ❑ ❑ through direct removal,filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ migratory wildlife corridors,or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources,such as a tree ❑ ® ❑ ❑ preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Conservation Plan,or other approved local, regional,or state habitat conservation plan? V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ❑ ® ❑ ❑ significance of a historical resource pursuant to Pennington Industrial Project Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 38 of 109 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated CEQA Guidelines§15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ pursuant to CEQA Guidelines§15064.5? c) Disturb any human remains, including those ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI. ENERGY. Would the project: a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient,or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for ❑ ❑ ® ❑ renewable energy or energy efficiency? VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault,as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map,issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other ❑ ❑ ® ❑ substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ❑ ❑ ® ❑ liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of ❑ ❑ ® ❑ topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- ❑ ❑ ® ❑ or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code(1994), ❑ ® ❑ ❑ creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater ❑ ❑ ® ❑ disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique ❑ ❑ ® ❑ geologic feature? Pennington Industrial Project Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 39 of 109 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated Vill. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions,either directly or indirectly,that may have a significant ❑ ❑ ® ❑ impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing ❑ ❑ ® ❑ the emissions of greenhouse gases? IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, ❑ ❑ ® ❑ or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous materials or acutely hazardous materials, ❑ ❑ ® ❑ substances,or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and,as a ❑ ❑ ® ❑ result,would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use ❑ ❑ ❑ airport,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ emergency evacuation plan? g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly,to a significant risk of loss, injury or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ death involving wildland fires? X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise ❑ ❑ ® ❑ substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater ❑ ❑ ® ❑ recharge,such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 40 of 109 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated basin? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ off-site; ii)Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would ❑ ❑ ® ❑ result in flooding on-or offsite; iii)Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff;or iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ d) In flood hazard,tsunami,or seiche zones, risk ❑ ❑ ® ❑ release of pollutants due to project inundation? e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable ❑ ❑ ® ❑ groundwater management plan? XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or ❑ ❑ ❑ regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? XII. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site ❑ ❑ ❑ delineated on a local general plan,specific plan or other land use plan? XIII. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards ❑ ® ❑ ❑ established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,or other applicable standards of other agencies? b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or ❑ ® ❑ ❑ groundborne noise levels? c) For a project located within the vicinity of a ❑ ❑ ❑ Pennington Industrial Project Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 41 of 109 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly(for example, by proposing new homes and businesses)or ❑ ❑ ❑ indirectly(for example,through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of ❑ ❑ ❑ replacement housing elsewhere? XV. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities,need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ b) Police protection? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ c) Schools? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ d) Parks? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ e) Other public services/facilities? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ XVI. RECREATION. a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial ❑ ❑ ® ❑ physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of ❑ ❑ ❑ recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XVII.TRANSPORTATION. Would the project: a) Conflict with a program plan,ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including ❑ ® ❑ ❑ transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand ❑ ® ❑ ❑ measures,or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Pennington Industrial Project Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 42 of 109 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature(e.g.sharp curves or dangerous ❑ ❑ ® ❑ intersections)or incompatible uses(e.g.farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ XVIII.TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource,defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site,feature, place,cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place,or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe,and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources,or in a local ❑ ❑ ® ❑ register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k). b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c)of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in ❑ ® ❑ ❑ subdivision (c)of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1,the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water,wastewater treatment or storm water drainage,electric ❑ ❑ ® ❑ power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities,the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future ❑ ❑ ® ❑ development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider,which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve ❑ ❑ ® ❑ the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards,or in excess of the capacity of local ❑ ❑ ® ❑ infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e) Comply with federal,state,and local management and reduction statutes and ❑ ❑ ® ❑ regulations related to solid waste? Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 43 of 109 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Significant With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated XX. WILDFIRE. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,would the project: a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency ❑ ❑ ❑ response plan or emergency evacuation plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds,and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations ❑ ❑ ❑ from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads,fuel breaks,emergency water sources, power lines or ❑ ❑ ❑ other utilities)that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or ❑ ❑ ❑ landslides,as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability,or drainage changes? XXI.MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment,substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, ❑ ® ❑ ❑ threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project ❑ ® ❑ ❑ are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects,and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on ❑ ® ❑ ❑ human beings,either directly or indirectly? Pennington Industrial Project Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 44 of 109 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS This section provides an evaluation of the impact categories and questions contained in the Environmental Checklist. A complete list of the reference sources applicable to the following source abbreviations is contained in Section VII, References, of this document. I. AESTHETICS a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (Less than Significant Impact) The most notable aesthetic resource in the City of Lake Elsinore (City) is Lake Elsinore itself, a 3,000-acre natural lake. The City's aesthetic setting is characterized by urbanized development of various densities occurring within varied topographical features and interspersed with undeveloped natural areas. Scenic resources within and surrounding the City include the lake, portions of the Cleveland National Forest, rugged hillside land, distant mountains and ridgelines, rocky outcroppings, streams, vacant land with native vegetation, parkland, and buildings of historical and cultural significance such as the cultural center, bathhouse, and military academy. The Project site is currently vacant and is bounded by commercial and industrial land uses to the north and west, Lake Elsinore Unified School District and Ortega High School to the south, and Government offices to the east. The proposed Project is located approximately 0.90 mile north from Lake Elsinore (water body) and does not propose any building heights in excess of those that are allowed by the City's Zoning Code; building heights will be 30 feet. Views of the scenic resources within and surrounding the City as described above, are the prominent scenic vistas in the area. However, the Project will not impede any of these views. Thus, the proposed Project will not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR; Google Earth; Project Description) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Less than Significant Impact) The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) currently identifies both 1-15 and SR-74 as eligible for listing as state scenic highways, but they are not officially designated as such. The proposed Project is approximately 1.40 miles from SR-74 and approximately 0.20 miles from I- 15. However, any potential visual impacts will be addressed through the City's design review process. Additionally,the City has local ordinances that protect the City's streetscape and trees.The City's Municipal Code includes a City Tree Preservation Ordinance (Ord. 1256). There are no trees Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 45 of 109 currently located within the Project site. The proposed Project will comply with Ord. 1256 to ensure the preservation of trees and the local streetscape. The City of Lake Elsinore has also determined that certain species of palm trees in the family Palmaceae are locally significant resources through the City Significant Palm Tree Ordinance (Ord. 1160). However, no palms occur on the Project site. Thus, through compliance with local ordinances and the City's design review process, any potential impact to scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway will be less than significant. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required (Sources: General Plan EIR; LEMC) c) In non-urbanized areas,substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? (Less than Significant) According to mapping information from the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), which is based on U.S. Census data for urbanized areas, the Project Site is not located within an urbanized area. The Proposed Project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. The Project site consists of a vacant parcel located in a mixed undeveloped and commercial area of the City. The site is surrounded by commercial and industrial land uses to the north and west, Lake Elsinore Unified School District and Ortega High School to the south, and Government offices to the east. The Proposed Project would include construction of construct three (3) industrial buildings that are 91,140 square foot (SF) in total with 167 parking spaces. No structures are being proposed that would diminish the existing visual character of the area or block views of the distant mountains and ridgelines. The Proposed Project is consistent with the intended land use for the area and meets development standards guiding the visual character of the site. The resulting aesthetic would be more organized, unified and urban, compared to the existing conditions. While the Proposed Project would markedly change the visual quality of the Project Site, it would not degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site or surroundings. Therefore, potential impacts associated with the visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: Project Description; SGAG) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Less than Significant Impact) Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 46 of 109 According to the City's General Plan, light and glare impacts to the Mount Palomar Observatory are of concern to the City. Areas of light pollution impacts have been identified through a "ring analysis," where primary impacts to the Observatory are within a 30-mile radius, and secondary impacts are up to 45 miles. According to the General Plan Figure 4.12, the Project site is within the 45-mile secondary impacts radius. The proposed Project would introduce light features to the vacant Project site.Accordingly,the new buildings and associated components would include lighting features typical of commercial developments, such as security lighting and indoor lighting. However, while the Proposed Project would introduce new sources of light, all lighting fixtures would comply with Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Section 17.112.040 Lighting (for Nonresidential Development). Section 17.112.040 requires all outdoor lighting fixtures in excess of 60 watts to be oriented and shielded to prevent direct illumination above the horizontal plane passing through the luminaire and prevent any glare or illumination on adjacent properties or streets. This section of the LEMC encourages the use of low-pressure sodium vapor lighting due to the City's proximity to the Mount Palomar Observatory. The Proposed Project would also introduce new sources of daytime glare due to the new building surfaces and vehicles traveling to and from the site. However, the glare created by the proposed development would be consistent with the levels of glare that are emitted by the surrounding development. The Proposed Project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Therefore, potential impacts associated with light or glare would be less than significant. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: LEMC, General Plan, Design Review Application) II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? No Impact) Agricultural uses constitute approximately 0.8 percent of the City's total acreage and are designated by the California Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) as Farmland of Local Importance (554 acres within the City), Grazing Land (827 acres within the City), and Unique Farmland (25 acres within the City). Remaining land is considered Urban/Built-Up Land or Other Land, reflecting its developed uses or other characteristics making it unsuitable for agriculture. None of the farmland designations applied to land within the City or Sphere of Influence (SOI) is considered Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance by the State of California. According to the California Department of Conservation California Important Farmland Finder, Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 47 of 109 the Project site consists of Urban/Built-Up Land. Thus, the proposed Project will not convert any Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: FMMP; General Plan EIR) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (No Impact) The proposed Project is not located within or adjacent to a Williamson Act contract as there are no Williamson Act agricultural preserves located within the City. Additionally, the Project site is zoned Limited Manufacturing (M-1) and surrounded by commercial, manufacturing and public/institutional zoning designations. The Proposed Project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. Thus, the proposed Project will not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: DOC WA; General Plan EIR; Zoning Map) c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? (No Impact) The proposed Project site is within the City of Lake Elsinore, which does not have zoning designated for forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production within City limits. Further, the site does not contain forestland or timberland. Thus, there is no conflict with existing zoning and no cause for rezoning of land related to forestland or timberland. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: Zoning Map) d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest uses? (No Impact) As indicated in Section II(c), the City does not have a zoning designation for forest land, timberland,or timberland zoned Timberland Production within City limits. In addition,the Project Site is currently vacant and is bounded by commercial and industrial land uses to the north and west, Lake Elsinore Unified School District and Ortega High School to the south, and Government offices to the east. The Proposed Project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest uses. Therefore, no impacts associated with forest land would occur. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 48 of 109 Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: Zoning Map) e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use? (No Impact) Historical site utilization research indicates the subject property was undeveloped from at least 1938 until 2005. Light agricultural use is evident on air photos in the 1940s and 1950s. From 2009 until 2010, the property was utilized as a contractor's storage yard. The property is currently vacant. Any agricultural setting that may have existed around the Proposed Project area has been developed with modern commercial, industrial, and school structures. No agricultural activities are presently occurring on-site. The existing condition on-site is vacant and undeveloped.The Proposed Project would be consistent with the existing zoning designation of Limited Manufacturing (M-1).The Proposed Project does not result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use. Therefore, no impacts associated with farmland would occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: Phase I ESA- Appendix D; Project Description; Zoning Map) III. AIR QUALITY a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less than Significant Impact) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a discussion of any inconsistencies between a Proposed Project and applicable General Plans and regional plans (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125). The regional plan that applies to the Proposed Project includes the SCAQMD AQMP. Therefore, this section discusses any potential inconsistencies of the Proposed Project with the AQMP. The Project site is located within the SCAB, which is characterized by relatively poor air quality. The SCAQMD has jurisdiction over an approximately 10,743 square-mile area consisting of the four-county Basin and the Los Angeles County and Riverside County portions of what use to be referred to as the Southeast Desert Air Basin. In these areas, the SCAQMD is principally responsible for air pollution control, and works directly with the SCAG, county transportation commissions, local governments, as well as state and federal agencies to reduce emissions from stationary, mobile, and indirect sources to meet state and federal ambient air quality standards. Currently, these state and federal air quality standards are exceeded in most parts of the SCAB. In response, the SCAQMD has adopted a series of AQMPs to meet the state and federal ambient air quality standards. AQMPs are updated regularly in order to more effectively reduce Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 49 of 109 emissions, accommodate growth, and to minimize any negative fiscal impacts of air pollution control on the economy. In March 2017, the AQMD released the Final 2016 AQMP.The 2016 AQMP continues to evaluate current integrated strategies and control measures to meet the NAAQS, as well as, explore new and innovative methods to reach its goals. Some of these approaches include utilizing incentive programs, recognizing existing co-benefit programs from other sectors, and developing a strategy with fair-share reductions at the federal, state, and local levels (46). Similar to the 2012 AQMP, the 2016 AQMP incorporates scientific and technological information and planning assumptions, including the 2016 RTP/SCS, a planning document that supports the integration of land use and transportation to help the region meet the federal Clean Air Act requirements (20). The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that "New or amended General Plan Elements (including land use zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be analyzed for consistency with the AQMP." Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually not required. A Proposed Project would be consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency: (1) Whether the project would result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. (2) Whether the project would exceed the assumptions in the AQMP or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase. Criterion 1 - Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations Construction Impacts Consistency Criterion No. 1 refers to violations of the CAAQS and NAAQS. CAAQS and NAAQS violations would occur if LSTs or regional significance thresholds were exceeded. As evaluated, the Project's regional and localized construction-source emissions would not exceed applicable regional significance threshold and LST thresholds. As such, a less than significant impact is expected. Operational Impacts As evaluated,the Project's regional and localized operational-source emissions would not exceed applicable regional significance threshold and LST thresholds. As such, a less than significant impact is expected. Based on the information provided above, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the first criterion. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 50 of 109 Criterion 2 - Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP The 2016 AQMP demonstrates that the applicable ambient air quality standards can be achieved within the timeframes required under federal law. Growth projections from local general plans adopted by cities in the district are provided to the SCAG, which develops regional growth forecasts,which are then used to develop future air quality forecasts for the AQMP. Development consistent with the growth projections in the City's General Plan is considered to be consistent with the AQMP. Construction Impacts Peak day emissions generated by construction activities are largely independent of land use assignments, but rather are a function of development scope and maximum area of disturbance. Irrespective of the site's land use designation, development of the site to its maximum potential would likely occur, with disturbance of the entire site occurring during construction activities. Operational Impacts The Project Site is designated as Limited Industrial (LI) in the Business District Plan and is zoned Light Manufacturing (M-1). The Proposed Project is consistent with the current land use designation and would not require a General Plan Amendment or zone change. The proposed Project consists of 91,140 square feet of manufacturing use, which is consistent with the site's Zoning designation and intensity. Additionally,the Project's construction and operational-source air pollutant emissions would not exceed the regional or localized significance thresholds. The Proposed Project would not exceed the AQMP assumptions for the Project Site and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the second criterion. The Project would not result in or cause NAAQS or CAAQS violations. The proposed Project is consistent with the land use and growth intensities reflected in the adopted General Plan. Furthermore, the Project would not exceed any applicable regional or local thresholds. Therefore, potential impacts associated with an inconsistency with the SCAQMD AQMP would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: AQ Analysis—Appendix A) b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? (Less than Significant Impact) The Proposed Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 51 of 109 for ozone precursors). Cumulative projects include local development as well as general growth within the project area. However, as with most development, the greatest source of emissions is from mobile sources, which travel throughout the local area. Therefore, from an air quality standpoint,the cumulative analysis would extend beyond any local projects and when wind patterns are considered would cover an even larger area. Accordingly, the cumulative analysis for the Proposed Project's air quality must be generic by nature. The project area is out of attainment for ozone and PM10 and PM2.5 particulate matter. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(b), this analysis of cumulative impacts incorporates a three-tiered approach to assess cumulative air quality impacts. • Consistency with the SCAQMD project specific thresholds for construction and operations; • Project consistency with existing air quality plans; and • Assessment of the cumulative health effects of the pollutants. Consistency with Project Specific Thresholds Construction Emissions The Project Site is located in the South Coast Air Basin, which is currently designated by the EPA for federal standards as a non-attainment area for ozone and PM2.5 and by CARB for the state standards as a non-attainment area for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5. On October 17, 2017, the SCAQMD in conjunction with the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) and other California air districts, released the latest version of the California Emissions Estimator ModelTM (CalEEMod'm) v2016.3.2. The purpose of this model is to calculate construction-source and operational-source criteria pollutant (VOCs, NOx, SOX, CO, PM1o, and PM2.5) and greenhouse gas(GHG)emissions from direct and indirect sources; and quantify applicable air quality and GHG reductions achieved from mitigation measures.Accordingly,the latest version of CalEEModT`" has been used for this Project to determine construction and operational air quality emissions. Construction activities associated with the Project will result in emissions of VOCs, NOx, SOx, CO, PM1o, and PM2.5. Construction related emissions are expected from site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities. The SCAQMD Rules that are currently applicable during construction activity for this Project include Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) (2) and Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings) (3). The estimated maximum daily construction emissions without mitigation are summarized on Table 2. Under the assumed scenarios, emissions resulting from the Project construction will not exceed criteria pollutant thresholds established by the SCAQMD for emissions of any criteria pollutant. Therefore, potential regional air quality impacts associated with construction of the Proposed Project would be less than significant. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 52 of 109 Table 2: Overall Construction Emissions Summary Emissions(Ibs/day) Year voc NOx CO sox PMio PM2.5 2020 4.17 42.47 22.10 0.05 10.07 6.02 2021 24.75 13.01 15.22 0.02 0.92 0.70 Maximum Daily Emissions 24.75 42.47 22.10 0.05 10.07 6.02 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO Ibs/day—Pounds Per Day Source:CalEEMod regional construction-source emissions are presented in Appendix 3.1. Operational Emissions Operational activities associated with the proposed Project will result in emissions of VOCs, NOx, Sox, CO, PM1o, and PM2.5. Operational emissions would be expected from the following primary sources: Area Source Emissions, Energy Source Emissions, and Mobile Source Emissions. Area Source Emissions Architectural Coatings - Over a period of time, the buildings that are part of this Project will be subject to emissions resulting from the evaporation of solvents contained in paints, varnishes, primers, and other surface coatings as part of Project maintenance. Consumer Products -_Consumer products include, but are not limited to detergents, cleaning compounds, polishes, personal care products, and lawn and garden products. Many of these products contain organic compounds which when released in the atmosphere can react to form ozone and other photochemically reactive pollutants. Landscape Maintenance Equipment - Landscape maintenance equipment would generate emissions from fuel combustion and evaporation of unburned fuel. Equipment in this category would include lawnmowers, shedders/grinders, blowers, trimmers, chain saws, and hedge trimmers used to maintain the landscaping of the Project. Energy Source Emissions Combustion Emissions Associated with Natural Gas and Electricity- Electricity and natural gas are used by almost every project. Criteria pollutant emissions are emitted through the generation of electricity and consumption of natural gas. However, because electrical generating facilities for the Project area are located either outside the region (state)or offset through the use of pollution credits (RECLAIM) for generation within the SCAB, criteria pollutant emissions from offsite generation of electricity is generally excluded from the evaluation of significance and only natural gas use is considered. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 53 of 109 Mobile Source Emissions Vehicles - The Project related operational air quality impacts derive primarily from vehicle trips generated by the Project. Trip characteristics available from the Pennington Industrial Project Focused Traffic Evaluation (Traffic Evaluation) (Urban Crossroads, Inc., 2019) were utilized in this analysis. In the last five years, the SCAQMD has provided numerous comments on the trip length for warehouse/distribution and industrial land use projects. The SCAQMD asserts that the model- default trip length in CaIEEModT"^ and the URBan EMISsions (URBEMIS) 2007 model (version 9.2.4) would underestimate emissions. It should be noted that for warehouse, distribution center, and industrial land use projects, most of the heavy-duty trucks would be hauling consumer goods, often from the POLA and POLB and/or to destinations outside of California. The SCAQMD states that for this reason, the CaIEEModT"^ and the URBEMIS model default trip length (approximately 12.6 miles)would not be representative of activities at like facilities.The SCAQMD generally recommends the use of a 40-mile one-way trip length. Two separate model runs were utilized in order to more accurately model emissions resulting from vehicle operations. The first run analyzed passenger car emissions, which incorporated a default trip length of 16.6 miles for passenger cars, an assumption of 100% primary trips, and a fleet mix of 61.4% Light-Duty-Auto vehicles (LDA), 4.3% Light-Duty Trucks (LDT1)2, 21.0% Light- Duty Trucks (LDT2)3, and 13.3% Medium-Duty Trucks (MDV). The second run analyzed truck emissions, which incorporated an average truck trip length of 40 miles, an assumption of 100% primary trips, and a fleet mix of 26.4% of Light-Heavy-Duty (LHD), 22.8% of Medium-Heavy-Duty (MHD), and 50.8% of Heavy-Heavy-Duty (HHD). Fugitive Dust Related to Vehicular Travel - Vehicles traveling on paved roads would be a source of fugitive emissions due to the generation of road dust inclusive of tire wear particulates. Local CO Hotspot Impacts from Project-Generated Vehicular Trips CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential local air quality impacts. Local air quality impacts can be assessed by comparing future without and with project CO levels to the State and Federal CO standards of 20 ppm over one hour or 9 ppm over eight hours. At the time of the 1993 Handbook,the Air Basin was designated nonattainment under the CAAQS and NAAQS for CO. With the turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels, and implementation of control technology on industrial facilities, CO concentrations in the Air Basin and in the state have steadily declined. In 2007, the Air Basin was designated in attainment for 2 Vehicles under the LDT1 category have a gross vehicle weight rating(GVWR)of less than 6,000 lbs.and equivalent test weight(ETW)of less than or equal to 3,750 lbs. 3 Vehicles under the LDT2 category have a GV WR of less than 6,000 lbs.and ETW between 3,751 lbs.and 5,750 lbs. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 54 of 109 CO under both the CAAQS and NAAQS. SCAQMD conducted a CO hot spot analysis for attainment at the busiest intersections in Los Angeles during the peak morning and afternoon periods and did not predict a violation of CO standards'. Since the nearby intersections to the Proposed Project are much smaller with less traffic than what was analyzed by the SCAQMD, no local CO Hotspot are anticipated to be created from the Proposed Project and no CO Hotspot modeling was performed. Therefore, potential long-term local air quality impacts associated with operation would be less than significant. On-Site Equipment Emissions It is common for industrial buildings to require cargo handling equipment to move empty containers and empty chassis to and from the various pieces of cargo handling equipment that receive and distribute containers. The most common type of cargo handling equipment is the yard truck which is designed for moving cargo containers. Yard trucks are also known as yard goats, utility tractors (UTRs), hustlers, yard hostlers, and yard tractors. The cargo handling equipment is assumed to have a horsepower(hp) range of approximately 175 hp to 200 hp. Based on the latest available information from SCAQMD (40); for example, high-cube warehouse projects typically have 3.6 yard trucks per million square feet of building space. For this particular Project, based on the maximum square footage of manufacturing use permitted by the proposed Project, on-site modeled operational equipment includes one (1) 200 hp, compressed natural gas-powered yard tractors operating at 4 hours a day for 365 days of the year. Table 3 summarizes the Project's daily regional emissions from on-going operations. During operational activity, the Project will not exceed any of the thresholds of significance. Therefore, potential regional air quality impacts associated with the operation would be less than significant. Table 3: Summary of Operational Emissions Operational Activities-Summer Emissions(lbs/day) Scenario vOC NOx CO Sox PM10 PM2.5 Area Source 2.09 2.90E-04 0.03 0.00 1.10E-05 1.00E-05 Energy Source 0.09 0.80 0.67 4.77E-03 0.06 0.06 Mobile Source(Passenger Cars) 1.07 1.66 21.83 0.07 7.42 1.99 Mobile Source(Trucks) 0.50 16.89 4.03 0.07 2.58 0.78 On-Site Equipment 0.14 1.55 0.77 3.17E-03 0.05 0.05 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 3.88 20.90 27.32 0.15 10.11 2.88 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO 4 The four intersections analyzed by the SCAQMD were: Long Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway;Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue; Sunset Boulevard and Highland Avenue; and La Cienega Boulevard and Century Boulevard. The busiest intersection evaluated(Wilshire and Veteran)had a daily traffic volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day with LOS E in the morning and LOS F in the evening peak hour. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 55 of 109 Operational Activities-Winter Emissions(lbs/day) Scenario voc NOx CO Sox PMia PM2.5 Area Source 2.09 2.90E-04 0.03 0.00 1.10E-05 1.00E-05 Energy Source 0.09 0.80 0.67 4.77E-03 0.06 0.06 Mobile Source(Passenger Cars) 0.85 1.71 17.46 0.07 7.42 1.99 Mobile Source(Trucks) 0.51 17.40 4.19 0.07 2.58 0.78 On-Site Equipment 0.14 1.55 0.77 3.17E-03 0.05 0.05 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 3.67 21.45 23.12 0.15 10.11 2.88 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 1 55 1 55 1 550 1 150 1 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO Source:CalEEMod regional operational-source emissions are presented in Appendices 3.2 and 3.3. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: AQ Analysis-Appendix A) c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Less than Significant Impact) The analysis makes use of methodology included in the SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology) (41). The SCAQMD has established that impacts to air quality are significant if there is a potential to contribute or cause localized exceedances of the federal and/or state ambient air quality standards (NAAQS/CAAQS). Collectively, these are referred to as Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs). The significance of localized emissions impacts depends on whether ambient levels in the vicinity of any given project are above or below State standards. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that will not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard at the nearest residence or sensitive receptor. Receptor locations are off-site locations where individuals may be exposed to emissions from Project activities. Residential Receptors Some people are especially sensitive to air pollution and are given special consideration when evaluating air quality impacts from projects.These groups of people include children,the elderly, individuals with pre-existing respiratory or cardiovascular illness, and athletes and others who engage infrequent exercise. Structures that house these persons or places where they gather to exercise are defined as "sensitive receptors"; they are also known to be locations where an individual can remain for 24 hours. Non-Residential Receptors As per the LSTMethodology, commercial and industrial facilities are not included in the definition Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 56 of 109 of sensitive receptor because employees do not typically remain onsite for a full 24 hours but are typically onsite for eight hours. However, it should be noted that the LST Methodology explicitly states that "LSTs based on shorter averaging periods, such as the NO2 and CO LSTs, could also be applied to receptors such as industrial or commercial facilities since it is reasonable to assume that a worker at these sites could be present for periods of one to eight hours (41)." Consistent with the SCAQMD's Final LST Methodology, the nearest industrial or commercial use to the Project site was used to determine operational and construction air impacts for emissions of NO2 and CO. Protect-related Sensitive Receptors Sensitive receptors in the Project study area include existing residential homes, industrial uses, and Ortega High School. The SCAQMD recommends that the nearest sensitive receptor be considered when determining the Project's potential to cause an individual and cumulatively significant impact. As such, the nearest residential receptor to the Project site is located approximately 916 feet/279 meters west Project site on Collier Avenue.Alternatively,the nearest non-residential receptor is an industrial building located 60 feet/18 meters north of the Project site on Minthorn Street. For purposes of analysis, a 279-meter receptor distance is utilized as a screening threshold to determine LSTs for emissions of PM10 and PM2.5. It should be noted that although the nearest non-sensitive receptor is 18-meters from the Project site, the LST Methodology explicitly states that "LSTs base on shorter averaging periods, such as the NO2 and CO LSTs, could also be applied to receptors such as industrial or commercial facilities since it is reasonable to assume that a worker at these sites could be present for periods of one to eight hours (41)." As such a 25-meter receptor distance was used for NO2 and CO. Table 4 identifies the localized impacts at the nearest receptor location in the vicinity of the Project. As shown, Project construction-source emissions would not exceed the numerical thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD for any criteria pollutant. Thus, a less than significant impact would occur for Project-related construction-source emissions and no mitigation is required. Table 4: Localized Significance Summary of Construction Emissions(Ibs/day) On-Site Site Preparation Emissions NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Maximum Daily Emissions 42.42 21.51 9.86 5.96 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 198 925 100 39 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO Emissions(Ibs/day) On-Site Grading Emissions NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Maximum Daily Emissions 26.39 16.05 4.04 2.51 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 162 750 96 37 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO Source:CalEEMod localized construction-source emissions are presented in Appendix 3.1. Pennington Industrial Project Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 57 of 109 Table 5 shows the calculated emissions fort he Project's operational activities compared with the applicable LSTs. The LST analysis includes on-site sources only; however, the CalEEModTM model outputs do not separate on-site and off-site emissions from mobile sources. In an effort to establish a maximum potential impact scenario for analytic purposes, the emissions shown on Table 5 represent all on-site Project-related stationary(area)sources and five percent (5%)of the Project-related mobile sources. As shown on Table 5, operational emissions will not exceed the LST thresholds for the nearest sensitive receptor. Thus, a less than significant impact would occur for Project-related operational-source emissions and no mitigation is required. Table 5: Localized Significance Summary of Operations Operational Activity Emissions(lbs/day) NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Maximum Daily Emissions 3.30 2.77 0.61 0.25 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 361 1,904 30 13 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO Source:CalEEMod localized operational-source emissions are presented in Appendices 3.2 and 3.3. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: AQ Analysis—Appendix A) d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? (Less than Significant Impact) The potential for the Project to generate objectionable odors has also been considered. Land uses generally associated with odor complaints include agricultural uses (livestock and farming), wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting operations, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding facilities. The Project does not contain land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable odors. Potential odor sources associated with the proposed Project may result from construction equipment exhaust and the application of asphalt and architectural coatings during construction activities and the temporary storage of typical solid waste (refuse) associated with the proposed Project's (long-term operational) uses. Standard construction requirements would minimize odor impacts from construction. The construction odor emissions would be temporary, short- term, and intermittent in nature and would cease upon completion of the respective phase of construction and is thus considered less than significant. It is expected that Project-generated refuse would be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals in compliance with the City's solid waste regulations. The proposed Project would also be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402 to prevent occurrences of public nuisances. Therefore, odors associated with the proposed Project construction and operations would be less than significant and no mitigation is required Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 58 of 109 Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: AQ Analysis—Appendix A) IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies,or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated) The site is located in the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) area, but not in a Criteria Cell or Survey Area and is dominated by low-growing vegetation. According to an Environmental Site Assessment-Phase 1 prepared by California Environmental in July 2018, the subject property has been previously disturbed and was used as a contractor's storage yard.The property is currently vacant. A construction materials debris pile was observed in the south corner of the site. Due to the numerous disturbances of the proposed Project site, there is little habitat value for the MSHCP and other special status species. The Project site is located within an MSHCP survey area for burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia).The burrowing owl (BUOW) is listed as a California Species of Concern as designated by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and is a conditionally covered species in the MSHCP. Therefore, mitigation measure MM Bio 1 will be implemented to conduct preconstruction focused species surveys for burrowing owl within 30-days prior to any ground-disturbing activities at the project site where suitable habitat is present. With the implementation of mitigation measure MM Bio 1, impacts to BUOW would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: MM Bio 1: Burrowing Owl Surveys. Due to the presence of suitable habitat onsite for the western burrowing owl, a qualified biologist shall conduct pre-construction focused species surveys within 30-days prior to any ground disturbing activities at the project site where suitable habitat is present. If burrowing owls are determined to occupy the project site during preconstruction surveys, CDFW shall be consulted and a passive relocation program shall be undertaken to relocate owls to an area outside the impact zone. The relocation shall be conducted following accepted protocols and would occur outside of the breeding season for the burrowing owl. Existing burrows shall be destroyed once they are vacated. (Sources: WR-MSHCP; RC GIS; Phase I ESA-Appendix D) b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Less than Significant Impact) Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 59 of 109 A variety of drainages cross the City of Lake Elsinore originating from the surrounding hills and generally draining towards Lake Elsinore.According to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, wetlands are present within the City primarily around Lake Elsinore. However, the project site does not contain any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community. These impacts were analyzed in the City of Lake Elsinore's General Plan EIR and were determined to be less than significant with the implementation of existing Federal and State programs, in particular Sections 401 and 404 of the U.S. Clean Water Act and Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code. The majority of the project site is dominated by disturbed habitat and non-native grasslands Therefore, impacts are less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR) c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh,vernal pool,coastal, etc.)through direct removal,filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (No Impact) There are no waters of the United States or waters of the State within the project site. There are also no marshes, vernal pools, or coastal waters within the project site. No impacts would occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (Less than Significant Impact) The Project site consists of undeveloped land consisting of seasonal nonnative grass communities. The project site is surrounded by commercial and industrial land uses to the north and west, Lake Elsinore Unified School District and Ortega High School to the south, and Government offices to the east. The Project area setting, which once consisted of agricultural and vacant land, has been significantly compromised by increased development. Due to this prior development in the local vicinity of the proposed Project, no wildlife movement or crossing occurs on the Project site, and the Project area does not provide topographic or vegetative features that function as a wildlife movement corridor, habitat linkage or nursery site. Thus, the proposed Project does not substantially interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 60 of 109 Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: Site Visit; Phase I ESA- Appendix D) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated) Chapter 5.120 of the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (Municipal Code) is referred to as the Tree Preservation Ordinance. This Chapter protects City trees, park trees and street trees within public areas owned by the City. The project site does not contain any trees protected under Chapter 5.120 of the Municipal Code and therefore,the project will have no impact.Additionally, Chapter 5.116 of the Municipal Code protects Significant Palm Trees within the City limits. This Chapter provides a mechanism to regulate the removal, destruction and relocation of significant palm trees. No palm trees occur within the project site and therefore, there will be no impact to Significant Palm Trees. Lastly, Chapter 19.04 of the Municipal Code is referred to as the Habitat Conservation Ordinance. The purpose of the ordinance is to implement the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan (SKRHCP). The project site is located within the fee area for the SKRHCP. Potential project impacts to the SKRHCP are discussed in Section IV.F below. There will be no impact on any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. Mitigation Measures: MM Bio 2: MSHCP Fees. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant/developer shall pay the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (WRMSHCP) development mitigation fees, in effect at the time permits are issued. MM Bio 3: SKR Fees. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant/developer shall pay the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan (SKRHCP) fees, in effect at the time permits are issued. (Sources: LEMC) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) The project is located within the boundaries of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). As such, a habitat assessment and consistency analysis is required to evaluate the project with respect to consistency with the MSHCP. A review of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) Conservation Summary Report Generator for the project site APN determined that the site is located within the Elsinore Area Plan of the MSHCP. Additionally, the project site is not located within a Criteria Cell, Cell Group, Existing Core Area, proposed Core Area, existing linkage, or a proposed linkage. The project site is located within a Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 61 of 109 required survey area for burrowing owl, as discussed above in Section W.A. Because the project site is located within the MSCCP boundary, it may have a substantial effect and requires mitigation. Additionally, the project site occurs within the boundaries of the SKRHCP. However, the project site is not located within the core reserve area, and therefore, the proposed project site may have a substantial effect on the SKRHCP, but will not affect any core reserve areas. Payment of the SKRHCP fee is required for project sites that occur within the SKRHCP area. The payment of the fee allows the City to implement the terms of the Section 10(a) permit and management authorization. Mitigation Measures: MM Bio 1: Burrowing Owl Surveys. Defined in Item IV.a, above. MM Bio 2: MSHCP Fees. Defined in Item IV.e, above. MM Bio 3: SKR Fees. Defined in Item IV.e, above. (Sources: WR-MSHCP; RC GIS; LEMC) V. CULTURAL RESOURCES a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15064.5? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) The Cultural Resources Inventory Report prepared for the Project by Dudek, dated November 4, 2019 (Appendix B) included a historical records search at the Eastern Information Center(EIC) on October 18, 2019 for the proposed project site and surrounding one-mile radius. EIC records indicate that 43 previous cultural resource investigations have been performed within one mile of the project area, of which only one addressed the project site (RI-3725),with two adjacent (RI- 5820 and RI-6728). The RI-3725 is the only study within the project area, and addressed both archaeological and historic built environment resources as part of a Phase 1 study prior to the Chaney Business center development. The two adjacent reports were focused on the property immediately adjacent to the southwest, and constituted a Phase I survey and evaluation of a single historic property. The property was found ineligible for the CRHP and has since been demolished. In the event that cultural resources (including historical, archaeological, and tribal cultural resources) are inadvertently discovered during ground-disturbing activities, MM Cul 1 requires work to be halted within 100 feet of the discovery until it can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist, the Native American tribal representative(s) from consulting tribes (or other appropriate ethnic/cultural group representative), and the Community Development Director or their designee to discuss the significance of the find. Construction activities may continue in other areas. If the discovery proves to be significant, additional work, such as data recovery excavation or resource recovery, may be warranted and would be discussed in consultation with the Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 62 of 109 appropriate regulatory agency and/or tribal group. With implementation of MM Cul 1, potential impacts to historical resources would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: MM Cul 1: Unanticipated Resources. The developer/permit holder or any successor in interest shall comply with the following for the life of this permit. If during ground disturbance activities, unanticipated cultural resources are discovered, the following procedures shall be followed: 1. All ground disturbance activities within 100 feet of the discovered cultural resource shall be halted until a meeting is convened between the developer,the Project Archaeologist, the Native American tribal representative(s) from consulting tribes (or other appropriate ethnic/cultural group representative), and the Community Development Director or their designee to discuss the significance of the find. 2. The developer shall call the Community Development Director or their designee immediately upon discovery of the cultural resource to convene the meeting. 3. At the meeting with the aforementioned parties, the significance of the discoveries shall be discussed and a decision is to be made,with the concurrence of the Community Development Director or their designee, as to the appropriate mitigation (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural resource. 4. Further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until a meeting has been convened with the aforementioned parties and a decision is made,with the concurrence of the Community Development Director or their designee, as to the appropriate mitigation measures. (Sources: General Plan EIR; Site Visit; Phase I Cultural Report -Appendix B) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15064.5? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) The Cultural Resources Inventory Report prepared for the Project by Dudek, dated November 4, 2019 (Appendix B) included a historical records search at the Eastern Information Center (EIC) on October 18, 2019 for the proposed project site and surrounding one-mile radius.The EIC records identified one hundred fifty-four cultural resources were within a one-mile radius of the project site, although none are within the project site. One historic district (P-33-007143) is located within the one-mile radius.The Lake Elsinore Historic Downtown district is located approximately mile to the south from the project area. This district contained 122 resources within one mile of the project; however, none are within the project area and will not be impacted by the project. Outside of the historic district the remaining resources include 22 historic structures, three historic sites, two historic isolates, and four prehistoric isolates. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 63 of 109 Dudek Archaeologist conducted an intensive pedestrian survey on October 23, 2019 using standard archaeological procedures and techniques. No cultural resources were identified during the pedestrian survey.The entire project site has been disturbed through previous development. A school complex currently occupies the area to the southwest of the site, with the associated modern debris and trash on the surface of the project area. No undisturbed, native sediments were observed. Inspection of rodent burrows and spoils in the vegetation planters identified only fill sediments comprised primarily of decomposed granite. However, there still remains the possibility that undiscovered buried archaeological resources might be encountered during construction. The City prepared consultation invitation letters to the Native American Tribes on the City's AB52 consultation list that were mailed on August 28, 2019. The City received a response from three tribes, and a summary of the consultation is provided in Section XVIII,Tribal Cultural Resources. In the event that cultural resources (including historical, archaeological, and tribal cultural resources) are inadvertently discovered during ground-disturbing activities, MM Cul 1 has been included to require work to be halted within 100 feet of the discovery until it can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist, the Native American tribal representative(s) from consulting tribes (or other appropriate ethnic/cultural group representative), and the Community Development Director or their designee to discuss the significance of the find. Construction activities may continue in other areas. If the discovery proves to be significant, additional work, such as data recovery excavation or resource recovery, may be warranted and would be discussed in consultation with the appropriate regulatory agency and/or tribal group. With implementation of MM Cul 1, potential impacts associated with archeological resources would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: MM Cul 1: Unanticipated Resources. Defined in Section V.a. above. (Sources: General Plan EIR; Site Visit; Phase I Cultural Report -Appendix B) c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) There are no cemeteries located within the proposed Project boundary. In the event human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 64 of 109 Thus, with adherence to existing regulatory requirements and implementation of mitigation measure MM Cul 2, the Project is not anticipated to disturb any human remains. Therefore, impacts are less than significant with mitigation. Mitigation Measures: MM Cul 2: Discovery of Human Remains. In the event that human remains (or remains that may be human) are discovered at the project site during grading or earthmoving, the construction contractors, project archaeologist and/or designated Native American Monitor shall immediately stop all activities within 100 feet of the find. The project applicant shall then inform the Riverside County Coroner and the City of Lake Elsinore Community Development Department immediately, and the coroner shall be permitted to examine the remains as required by California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(b). Section 7050.5 requires that excavation be stopped in the vicinity of discovered human remains and that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. If human remains are determined to be Native American, the applicant shall comply with the state law relating to the disposition of Native American burials that fall within the jurisdiction of the NAHC(PRC Section 5097).The coroner shall contact the NAHC within 24 hours and the NAHC will make the determination of most likely descendant. The most likely descendant shall then make recommendations and engage in consultation concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resource Code Section 5097.98. In the event that the applicant and the MLD are in disagreement regarding the disposition of the remains. State law will apply and the mediation process will occur with the NAHC, if requested (see PRC Section 5097.98(e) and 5097.94(k)). According to the California Health and Safety Code, six or more human burial at one location constitutes a cemetery(Section 8100), and disturbance of Native American cemeteries is a felony (Section 7052). (Sources: General Plan EIR; Site Visit; Phase I Cultural Report -Appendix B) VI. ENERGY a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? (Less than Significant Impact) The Property Owner/Developer would comply with all applicable regulations related to construction and operation of the Proposed Project, including the City of Lake Elsinore building code,the MHSCP(Section IV),the Climate Action Plan (Section VIII),and solid waste management (Section XIX). Therefore, potential impacts associated with wasteful energy use during construction or operation would be less than significant. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 65 of 109 Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: Initial Study) b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? (Less than Significant Impact) The Proposed Project would comply with the City of Lake Elsinore building code, which is consistent with the State of California Energy Commission 2016 Building Energy Efficient Standards' for Non-Residential Buildings. The City of Lake Elsinore has adopted the City of Lake Elsinore Climate Action Plan (Climate Action Plan), on December 13, 2011. The Climate Action Plan provides specific measures to be implemented in new developments to reduce GHG emissions as well as a GHG emissions reduction target based on a community-wide emissions reduction to 6.6 MTCO2e per service population per year by 2020. The Climate Action Plan also addresses measures that address renewable energy and energy efficiency (Project Design Features 1 through 6). Appendix A provides a list of the applicable reduction measures for new non-residential developments included in the Climate Action Plan and a project consistency analysis of each measure. With implementation of Project Design Features 1 through 6, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the applicable local measures provided in the Climate Action Plan. Therefore, potential impacts associated with obstructing a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: Initial Study, General Plan) VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map, issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. (Less than Significant Impact) The City is located in the northern part of the Peninsular Ranges Province and includes parts of two structural blocks, or structural subdivisions of the province. The active Elsinore fault zone diagonally crosses the southwest corner of the Elsinore 7.5' quadrangle and is a major element of the right-lateral strike-slip San Andreas Fault system. The Elsinore Fault Zone forms a complex series of pull-apart basins. According to the Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report prepared for the Project by CW 5 https://www.energy.ca.gov/titte24/2016standards/ Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 66 of 109 Soils, dated February 27,2019 (Appendix C),the subject property is not located within an Alquist- Priolo Fault Rupture Hazard Study Zone, established by the State of California to restrict the construction of habitable structures across identifiable traces of known active faults. No active faults with the potential for surface fault rupture are known to pass directly beneath the site. The nearest faults to the Project site are associated with the Elsinore Fault system located approximately 1.8 miles from the site. Thus, the potential for surface rupture due to faulting occurring beneath the site during the design life of the proposed development is considered low. Additionally, any structure developed as a part of the Project will be subject to seismic design criteria in accordance with the California Building Code (CBC) which will reduce potential impacts related to the rupture of an earthquake fault. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: Geotechnical Report—Appendix C) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (Less than Significant Impact) The site is situated in a seismically active area that has historically been affected by generally moderate to occasionally high levels of ground motion.The site lies in relative close proximity to several seismically active faults; therefore, during the life of the proposed improvements, the City and surroundings also have the potential to experience significant ground shaking as a result of seismic activity on a number of the Peninsular Ranges' other active faults as shown in Section 3.11 Geology & Soils of the Lake Elsinore General Plan EIR. The Proposed Project would be designed and constructed in accordance with seismic design requirements of the current California Building Code (CBC), which would address potential impacts related to potential ground shaking. Therefore, potential impacts associated with strong seismic ground shaking would be less than significant Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR, Geotechnical Report—Appendix C) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? (Less than Significant Impact) The geotechnical investigation for the Proposed Project evaluated the potential for seismic- related ground failure, including liquefaction, at the Project Site. The three requirements for liquefaction to occur include seismic shaking, poorly consolidated cohesionless sands, and groundwater. Liquefaction results in a substantial loss of shear strength in loose, saturated, cohesionless soils subjected to earthquake induced ground shaking. Potential impacts from liquefaction include loss of bearing capacity, liquefaction related settlement, lateral movements, and surface manifestation in the form of sand boils. The Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report prepared for the Project by CW Soils, dated February 27, 2019 (Appendix C) provided liquefaction analyses that model the existing ungraded Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 67 of 109 conditions and recommended graded conditions, using a groundwater level of 5 feet to represent a conservative historic high groundwater level. The analyses of the post-graded conditions revealed that potentially liquefiable soils were encountered in boring B-2,from 14 to 19 feet.The geotechnical report estimates that dynamic settlement of sands due to liquefaction will be approximately 1.7 inches near Boring B-2 prior to performing the recommended grading improvements. Upon completion of the recommended grading improvements, the report estimates that dynamic settlement of sands due to liquefaction will be approximately 0 inches near Boring B-2. Therefore, the potential for design level earthquake induced liquefaction and lateral spreading to occur beneath the proposed structures is considered very low to remote due to the recommended compacted fill and the dense nature of the deeper onsite soils. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Property Owner/Developer of the Proposed Project would be required to submit grading and foundation plans to the City for review to demonstrate compliance with the City's grading requirements as well as any applicable recommendations contained in the geotechnical report. The Proposed Project would be designed and constructed in accordance with CBC requirements which would reduce risks associated with liquefaction. Therefore, potential impacts to people or structures from liquefaction shaking would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: Geotechnical Report—Appendix C) iv) Landslides? (No Impact) Landslides result from the downward movement of earth or rock materials that have been influenced by gravity. In general, landslides occur due to various factors including steep slope conditions, erosion, rainfall, groundwater, adverse geologic structure, and grading impacts. The Project Site is generally flat and is surrounded by similar topography and no significant slopes are proposed as part of the project design. The Project Site is in the Business District of the General Plan and its slope is less than 15%. Potential landslide impacts would be concentrated in districts with steep slopes of more than 30% and in Hillside Residential land use designations, including the Northwest Sphere, Lake View Sphere, Lakeland Village, Alberhill, North Central Sphere, Meadowbrook, Lake Elsinore Hills, and Riverview Districts of the General Plan. Therefore, no impacts associated with landslides would occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR, Riverside County GIS) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (Less than Significant Impact) Construction activities have the potential to result in soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. However, erosion will be addressed through the implementation of existing State and Federal requirements, and minimized through compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 68 of 109 Elimination System (NPDES) general construction permit which requires that a storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) be prepared prior to construction activities and implemented during construction activities. The preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will identify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to address soil erosion. Upon compliance with these standard regulatory requirements,the proposed Project is not anticipated to result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: PWQMP—Appendix F) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (Less than Significant Impact) Seismically-induced lateral spreading involves primarily lateral movement of earth materials due to ground shaking. For lateral spreading to occur, the liquefiable zone must be continuous, unconstrained laterally, and free to move along gently sloping ground toward an unconfined area. Lateral spreading results in near-vertical cracks with predominantly horizontal movement of the soil mass involved.A gentle slope in the ground face or the presence of a slope face nearby can cause the ground to slide or spread on layers of liquefied soil. The Project Site is generally flat and there is no slope. The Project Site is not located in an area of landslide potential. The geotechnical report recommends that prior to placing compacted fills, the exposed bottom should be scarified to a depth of 6 inches or more, watered or air dried as necessary to achieve near optimum moisture content and then compacted to a minimum of 90 percent. The Proposed Project would be constructed in compliance with the recommendations in the geotechnical report and the CBC. Therefore, potential impacts associated with unstable soil would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: Geotechnical Report—Appendix C) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994),creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) While there is currently no soil mapping that identifies specific areas within the City that are subject to expansive soils, such soils are known to exist in the City. Expansive soils are composed of a significant amount of clay particles which can expand (absorb water) or contract (release water).These shrink and swell characteristics can result in structural stress and place other loads on these soils. According to the Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report prepared for the Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 69 of 109 Project by CW Soils, the preliminary laboratory test results indicate that the onsite soils exhibit an expansion potential of Medium (Expansion Index of 51 to 90) as classified by the 2016 CBC. The CBC specifies that slab on grade foundations (floor slabs) resting on soils with expansion indices greater than 20, require special design considerations per the 2016 CBC. Accordingly, measures are considered necessary to reduce anticipated expansion and collapse potential. Implementation of mitigation measure MM Geo 1, requiring the proposed Project to comply with all recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Report, will reduce impacts related to expansive soil conditions to a less than significant level. The design procedures incorporate the thickness and plasticity index of the various soils within the upper 15 feet of the proposed structure. Mitigation Measures: MM Geo 1: Compliance with Recommendations from the Geotechnical Interpretive Report. Per the Preliminary Foundation Design Recommendations section of the Geotechnical Report, the Project shall comply with the recommendations for: Conventional Footings, Building Floor Slabs, and Post Tensioned Slab/Foundation Design Recommendations as described below: a. Conventional Footings • Exterior continuous footings should be founded at the minimum depths below the lowest adjacent final grade (i.e. minimum 18 inch depth for one- story and two-story, and minimum 24 inch depth for three-story construction). Interior continuous footings for one-, two-, and three-story construction may be founded at a minimum depth of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade. In accordance with Table 1809.7 of the 2016 CBC, all continuous footings should have a minimum width of 12, 15, and 18 inches, for one-, two-, and three-story structures, respectively, and should be reinforced with a minimum of four (4) No. 4 bars, two (2)top and two (2) bottom. • Exterior pad footings intended to support roof overhangs, such as second story decks, patio covers and similar construction should be a minimum of 24 inches square and founded at a minimum depth of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade. The pad footings should be reinforced with a minimum of No.4 bars spaced a maximum of 18 inches on center, each way, and should be placed near the bottom-third of the footings. b. Building Floor Slabs • Building floor slabs should be a minimum of 4 inches thick. All floor slabs should be reinforced with a minimum of No. 3 bars spaced a maximum of 18 inches on center, each way, supported by concrete chairs or bricks to ensure desired mid-depth placement. Based on an assumed effective plasticity index of 16, the project architect or structural engineer should evaluate minimum floor slab thickness and reinforcement in accordance with 2016 CBC Section 1808.6.2. • Building floor slabs with moisture sensitive or occupied areas, should be Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 70 of 109 underlain by a minimum 10-mil thick moisture barrier to help reduce the upward migration of moisture from the underlying soils. The moisture barrier should be properly installed using the guidelines of ACI publication 318-05 and meet the performance standards of ASTM E 1745 Class A material. Prior to placing concrete, it is the responsibility of the contractor to ensure that the moisture barrier is properly placed and free of openings, rips, or punctures. As an option for additional moisture protection and foundation strength, higher strength concrete, such as a minimum compressive strength of 5,000 pounds per square inch (psi) in 28-days may be used. In addition, a capillary break/vapor retarder for concrete slabs should be provided in accordance with CALGreen. Ultimately, the design of the moisture barrier system along with recommendations for concrete placement and curing are the purview of the foundation engineer, factoring in the project conditions provided by the architect and owner. • Garage floor slabs should be a minimum of 5 inches thick and should be reinforced in a similar manner as living area floor slabs. Garage floor slabs should be placed separately from adjacent wall footings with a positive separation maintained with % inch minimum felt expansion joint materials and quartered with weakened plane joints. A 12 inch wide turn down founded at the same depth as adjacent footings should be provided across garage entrances. The turn down should be reinforced with a minimum of two (2) No. 4 bars, one (1) top and one (1) bottom. • Prior to placing concrete, the subgrade soils below all floor slabs should be pre-watered to achieve a moisture content at least 1.1 times optimum. The moisture content should penetrate a minimum depth of 12 inches into the subgrade soils. The pre-watering should be verified and tested by CW Soils. c. Post Tensioned Slab/Foundation Design Recommendations In lieu of the proceeding foundation recommendations, post tensioned slabs may be used forthe proposed structures. Post tension foundations are generally considered to be a better foundation system, but may be slightly higher in overall cost.The foundation engineer may design the post tensioned foundation system using the following Post Tensioned Foundation Slab Design table. These parameters have been provided in general accordance with Post Tensioned Design. Alternate designs addressing the effects of expansive soils are allowed per 2016 CBC Section 1808.6.2. When utilizing these parameters,the foundation engineer should design the foundation system in accordance with the allowable deflection criteria of applicable codes. It should be noted that the post tensioned design methodology is partially based on the assumption that soils moisture changes around and underneath post tensioned slabs, are only influenced by climate conditions. With regard to expansive soils, moisture variations below slabs are the major factor in foundation damage. However, the design methodology does not take into Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 71 of 109 account presaturation, owner irrigation, or other non-climate related influences on the moisture content of the subgrade soils. In recognition of these realities, we modified the soils parameters obtained from this methodology to help account for reasonable irrigation practices. Additionally, the slab subgrades should be presoaked to a depth of 12 inches and maintained at above optimum moisture until placing concrete. Furthermore, prior to placing concrete, the subgrade soils below all floor slabs and perimeter footings should be presoaked to achieve moisture contents at least 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 times optimum to depths of 6, 12, 18, and 24 inches for Low, Medium, High, and Very High expansion potential soils, respectively. The moisture content should penetrate to a minimum depth of 24 inches into the subgrade soils. The pre-watering should be verified and tested by CW Soils. Ponding water near the foundation can significantly change the moisture content of the soils below the foundation, causing excessive foundation movement and detrimental effects. Our recommendations do not account for excessive irrigation and/or incorrect landscape designs. To prevent moisture infiltration below the foundation, planters placed adjacent to the foundation should be designed with an effective drainage system or liners. Some lifting of the perimeter foundation should be expected even with properly constructed planters. Future owners should be informed and educated of the importance in maintaining a consistent level of moisture within the soils around structures. Potential negative consequences can result from either excessive watering or allowing expansive soils to become too dry. Expansive soils will shrink as they dry, followed by swelling during the rainy winter season or when irrigation is resumed, causing distress to site improvements. (Sources: Geotechnical Report—Appendix C) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? (Less than Significant Impact) The proposed Project will be served by a sewer system and no septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems would be required. Existing septic systems and any septic systems discovered during the development of the proposed Project will be properly abandoned, closed, or destroyed in accordance with all applicable state and local regulations. Thus, the proposed Project would not have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Therefore, impacts are less than significant Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 72 of 109 (Sources: Project Description) f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? (Less than Significant Impact) According to the Riverside County GIS database, the proposed Project is located within a paleontological sensitivity area of low potential. Due to the previously developed and disturbed nature of the Project site, no paleontological resources or site or unique geologic features are anticipated to be impacted. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: Riverside County GIS) Vill. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions,either directly or indirectly,that may have a significant impact on the environment? (Less than Significant Impact) Construction activities associated with the Project would result in emissions of CO2 and CH4 from construction activities. For construction phase Project emissions, GHGs are quantified and amortized over the life of the Project. To amortize the emissions over the life of the Project, construction emissions were amortized over a 30-year period and added to the annual operational phase GHG emissions. Operational activities associated with the proposed Project will result in emissions of CO2, CH4, and N20 from the following primary sources: Area Source Emissions, Energy Source Emissions (combustion emissions associated with natural gas and electricity), Mobile Source Emissions, On- site Equipment Emissions, Water Supply, Treatment, and Distribution, and Solid Waste. The annual GHG emissions associated with the operation of the proposed Project are estimated to be 2,635.39 MTCO2e per year as summarized in Table 6. Table 6: Project GHG Emissions Emission Source Emissions (metric tons per year) CO2 CH4 N20 Total CO2E Annual construction-related emissions 17.27 0.00 0.00 17.35 amortized over 30 years Area Source 0.01 2.00E-05 0.00 0.01 Energy Source 460.08 0.02 0.01 462.10 Mobile (Passenger Car) Sources 674.56 0.01 0.00 674.89 Mobile (Truck) Sources 1,255.52 0.04 0.00 1,256.55 On-Site Equipment 50.84 0.02 0.00 51.25 Waste 22.94 1.36 0.00 56.83 Water Usage 94.13 0.69 0.17 116.41 Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 73 of 109 Total CO2E (All Sources) 2,635.39 Screening Threshold (CO2e) 10,000 Threshold Exceeded? NO Source:CalEEModTM model output,See Appendices 3.1 through 3.3 for detailed model outputs. The SCAQMD's adopted numerical threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e per year for industrial stationary source emissions is selected as the significance criterion. The SCAQMD-adopted industrial threshold was selected by the City because the proposed Project is more analogous to an industrial use than any other land use such as commercial or residential in terms of its expected operating characteristics. The Project proposes a warehouse use that will serve mid- stream functions in the goods movement chain between manufacturers and consumers, characteristic of an industrial operation. Further, analysis of the Project's traffic generation in this report is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017 for warehouse and industrial land use categories. Also, 10,000 MTCO2e has been used as the significance threshold by many local government lead agencies for logistics projects throughout the SCAG region since the SCAQMD adopted this threshold for its own use. Further, to ensure that the threshold is conservative in its application, although the SCAQMD uses their adopted 10,000 MTCO2e threshold to determine the significance of stationary source emissions for industrial projects,the 10,000 MTCO2e threshold used in this CEQA document is applied to all sources of Project-related GHG emissions whether stationary source, mobile source,area source, or other. Use of this threshold is also consistent with guidance provided in the CAPCOA CEQA and Climate Change handbook, as such, the City has opted to use a non-zero threshold approach based on Approach 2 of the handbook. Threshold 2.5 (Unit-Based Thresholds Based on Market Capture) establishes a numerical threshold based on capture of approximately 90 percent of emissions from future development. The latest threshold developed by SCAQMD using this method is 10,000 MTCO2e based on the review of 711 CEQA projects. As previously stated, the Project will result in approximately 2,635.39 MTCO2e per year. As such, the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD's numeric threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e if it were applied. Thus, the Project would not have the potential to result in a cumulatively considerable impact with respect to GHG emissions. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: GHG Report—AppendixH) b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? (Less than Significant Impact) The Proposed Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. The City of Lake Elsinore has adopted the City of Lake Elsinore Climate Action Plan (CAP), on December 13, 2011. The CAP Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 74 of 109 provides specific measures to be implemented in new developments to reduce GHG emissions. Appendix G, Table 3-4 provides a list of the applicable reduction measures for new non- residential developments included in the Climate Action Plan and a project consistency analysis of each measure. With implementation of Project Design Features 1 through 8, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the applicable local measures provided in the CAP as well as the programs and standards that would be implemented as a result of the CAP. Section III(a) shows that the Proposed Project is consistent with the General Plan Update growth projections. The Proposed Project would comply with the CAP's local measures and reduction targets and would not conflict with the applicable plan for reducing GHG emissions. Therefore, potential impacts associated with conflict with a plan, policy, or regulation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: GHG Report—Appendix H, CAP) IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Less than Significant Impact) Construction of the proposed Project may include the transportation and storage of hazardous materials, such as fuels, cleaning solvents, or pesticides. The transportation of hazardous materials can result in accidental spills, leaks, toxic releases, fire, or explosion. The proposed Project is not expected to create the need for an excess of hazardous materials being used on- site during construction or operation. A number of federal and state agencies prescribe strict regulations for the safe transportation of hazardous materials. Hazardous material transport, storage and response to upsets or accidents are primarily subject to federal regulation by the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) Office of Hazardous Materials Safety in accordance with Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations. California regulations applicable to Hazardous material transport, storage and response to upsets or accidents are codified in Title 13 (Motor Vehicles),Title 8 (Cal/OSHA), Title 22 (Management of Hazardous Waste), Title 26 (Toxics) of the California Code of Regulations, and the Chapter 6.95 of the Health and Safety Code (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory). As the proposed Project will be required to comply with all applicable federal and state laws related to the transportation, use, storage and response to upsets or accidents that may involve hazardous materials would reduce the likelihood and severity of upsets and accidents during transit and storage, it is not expected to result in the use of large amounts of hazardous materials that would create a hazard to the public or environment. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 75 of 109 Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: CCR; Code of Federal Regulations; Health and Safety Code) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Less than Significant Impact) As noted in response Item IX.a above, the proposed Project may involve the use of hazardous materials but shall comply with all applicable federal and state laws pertaining to the transport, use, disposal, handling, and storage of hazardous materials, including but not limited to Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations and Title 13, (motor vehicles) Title 8 (Cal/OSHA), Title 22 (Health and Safety Code),Title 26 (Toxics) of the California Code of Regulations, and Chapter 6.95 of the Health and Safety Code (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory), which describes strict regulations for the safe transportation and storage of hazardous materials. Thus, the proposed Project will be required to comply with all applicable federal and state laws related to the transportation, use and storage of hazardous materials and will not create a significant hazard to the public or environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: CCR; Code of Federal Regulations; Health and Safety Code) c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous materials or acutely hazardous materials, substances,or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Less than Significant Impact) The closest school site is the Ortega High School, located directly south of the Project site. As previously discussed, the Proposed Project would be required to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations pertaining to the transport, use, disposal, handling, and storage of hazardous waste during the construction phase to reduce the likelihood and severity of accidents during transit. Proper handling of the use and disposal of hazardous materials would reduce the potential for exposure of any school in proximity to the Project Site to hazardous materials. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: CCR; Code of Federal Regulations; Health and Safety Code) d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Less than Significant Impact) Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 76 of 109 Based on the California Department of Toxic Substances Control, EnviroStor Site/Facility Search, the Project Site is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. An Environmental Site Assessment - Phase 1 was prepared by California Environmental in July 2018 for the proposed Project site; a site visit was conducted on May 5, 2018. Historical site utilization research indicates the subject property was undeveloped from at least 1938 until 2005. Light agricultural use is evident on air photos in the 1940s and 1950s. From 2009 until 2010 the property was utilized as a contractor's storage yard.The property is currently vacant. A construction materials debris pile was observed in the south corner of the site.The pile contained concrete fragments, RCP sections, a concrete septic tank, red clay bricks, miscellaneous metal, concrete footings and small concrete slabs. Clay pot fragments, brick, small concrete pieces and asphalt grindings were spread over much of the surface of the site. No evidence of hazardous materials was observed in the construction debris observed at the site. Screening soil sampling was conducted at the site to evaluate for TPH, metals, PCBs and organochlorine pesticides in shallow soil at the site. PCBs and pesticides were not detected. The low concentrations of TPH (40-92 mg/Kg) detected in soil are likely related to the asphalt debris observed in shallow soil and this is not an environmental concern. The concentrations of metals detected are within the ranges normally found in native soils except for an elevated concentration of lead (250 mg/Kg) detected in sample S2. The concentration of lead detected in sample S2 is below the CaIEPA-DTSC screening level of 320 mg/Kg for commercial properties.The clay pot fragments containing glazing were tested for the presence of metals. No hazardous concentrations of metals were detected in the clay pot glazing. The subject property is not identified on the standard environmental government sources researched in this report. The nearest listed environmental concern site is located at 653 West Minthorn Street, approximately 190 feet to the northeast. This offsite property was formerly occupied by Rightway Portable Toilets. A release from a gasoline UST impacted the soil at this offsite facility. This site was granted case closure from the Santa Ana RWQCB in 1989. Impact to the subject site from this offsite property is considered unlikely as the site was granted case closure by the Santa Ana RWQCB. No additional data regarding this offsite release was found. Therefore, potential impacts associated with hazardous materials sites would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: DTSC; Google Earth; Phase I ESA—Appendix D) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (No Impact) The Proposed Project is not be located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport or public use airport. Therefore, no impacts associated with safety hazards or Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 77 of 109 excessive noise in proximity to an airport would occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR) f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Less than Significant Impact) The proposed Project will be required to comply with all applicable fire code requirements for construction and access to the site and as such, will be reviewed by the City Fire Department to determine the specific fire requirements applicable to ensure compliance with these requirements. This review will ensure that the Project will provide adequate emergency access to and from the site. Further, the City Engineer and the City Fire Department will review any modifications to existing roadways to ensure that adequate emergency access and/or emergency response would be maintained. Thus, the proposed Project does not propose any changes that will impact the City's Emergency Preparedness Plan or the Riverside County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan so will not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR) g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? (Less than Significant Impact) According to the Riverside County Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps and the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan EIR Figure 3.10-2 (City of Lake Elsinore Wildfire Susceptibility),the Project Site is not located in a High or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The Project Site is vacant and bounded by commercial and industrial land uses to the north and west, Lake Elsinore Unified School District and Ortega High School to the south, and Government offices to the east. As part of the plan check process, the Project Site plan would undergo a fire, life, and safety review by the City Fire Department to determine the specific fire requirements applicable to ensure compliance with these requirements. Therefore, impacts associated with wildland fires would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: Riverside County Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps, General Plan EIR Figure 3.10-2 -City of Lake Elsinore Wildfire Susceptibility) X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 78 of 109 a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? (Less than Significant Impact) The Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB) sets water quality standards for all ground and surface waters within the Project's region. Water quality standards are defined under the Clean Water Act to include both the beneficial uses of specific water bodies and the levels of water quality that must be met and maintained to protect those uses (water quality objectives). Construction of the Proposed Project would include grading, excavation, and other earthmoving activities that have the potential to cause erosion that could subsequently degrade water quality and/or violate water quality standards. As required by the Clean Water Act,the Proposed Project would comply with the Santa Ana Municipal Separate Storm Sewer (MS4) National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. The NPDES MS4 Permit Program, which is administered in the project area by Riverside County and is issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), regulates storm water and urban runoff discharges from developments to natural and constructed storm drain systems in the City of Lake Elsinore. Since the Proposed Project would disturb one or more acres of soil, construction activities would be subject to the Construction General Permit (NPDES General Permit No. CAS000002, Waste Discharge Requirements, Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ, adopted September 2, 2009 and effective as of July 2, 2010) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB).The Construction General Permit requires implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)for site clearing, grading, and disturbances such as stockpiling or excavation. The SWPPP would generally contain a site map showing the construction perimeter, proposed buildings, storm water collection and discharge points, general pre- and post-construction topography, drainage patterns across the site, and adjacent roadways. Development of the Project Site would add impervious surfaces through associated parking lot and parking, sidewalks, and drive aisles. By increasing the percentage of impervious surfaces on the Project Site, less water would percolate into the ground and more surface runoff would be generated. Paved areas and streets would collect dust, soil and other impurities that would then be assimilated into surface runoff during rainfall events. Operation of the Proposed Project has the potential to release pollutants resulting from replacing vacant land with roadways, walkways, and parking lots.These improvements may potentially impact water quality. However, according to the Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan prepared by SB&O, Inc., dated May 17, 2019 (Appendix E), while the Project is approximately 80% impervious, the impervious area has been reduced to the minimum area possible. The pervious area will be vegetated landscape and one underground infiltration basin underneath the proposed parking areas. The Preliminary WQMP has been submitted to the City Public Works Department for review. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, a final WQMP will be required for the Project. The proposed Project incorporates site design, source controls and treatment control BMPs to address storm water runoff. The building rooftops shall drain back to landscape areas, where Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 79 of 109 possible, for natural filtration. The catch basins will have filtration inserts to filter runoff prior to entering the proposed underground infiltration basin. Thus, through BMPs combined with compliance of existing regulations the proposed Project will not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: PWQMP—Appendix F) b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge, such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? (Less than Significant Impact) According to General Plan EIR, the proposed Project is located within the Elsinore Groundwater Management Zone (GMZ). Since the City has a large amount of vacant land, substantial changes to recharge systems could occur from development of the vacant parcels. In order to reduce pollutants, the City has implemented policies to minimize pollutants in the local and regional waterways,which includes water that percolates into the groundwater through Water Resources Policies 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3. Water Resources Policies 4.1 and 4.2 require development projects to acquire a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and implement Best Management Practices (BMPs)to reduce pollutants. Water Resources Policy 4.3 requires the City to review future development project's beneficial uses during the environmental review stage. Therefore, the proposed Project is not expected to substantially deplete groundwater supplies. As outlined in the Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan prepared by SB&O, Inc., the proposed Project utilizes the minimum impervious area possible. The pervious area will be vegetated landscape and one underground infiltration basin underneath the proposed parking areas. The proposed Project incorporates site design, source controls and treatment control BMPs to address storm water runoff. Where possible, the building rooftops shall drain back to landscape areas for natural filtration. The catch basins will have filtration inserts to filter runoff prior to entering the proposed underground infiltration basins. These conditions are not conducive to groundwater recharge. Thus, development of the Project site will not substantially interfere with groundwater recharge. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR; PWQMP—Appendix F) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i). Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? (Less than Significant Impact) Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 80 of 109 According to the Preliminary Drainage Report prepared by SB&O, Inc., dated May 17, 2019 (Appendix D), approximately 43% of the existing site drains south and discharges from the site into a concrete inlet on the adjoining County social services property. The remainder of the project site discharges into Chaney Street all along the northwest property line. Development of the Project site for industrial use will include associated parking, landscape areas, and drive aisles. The existing inlet will be blocked off at the property line and all proposed site flows will discharge to Chaney Street and ultimately into Temescal Creek. The Project is subject to NPDES requirements including preparing and implementing a SWPPP for the prevention of runoff during construction. Erosion, siltation and other possible pollutants associated with long-term implementation of the Project is addressed as part of the project- specific Preliminary WQMP and grading permit process. Thus, through compliance with existing regulations and policies the proposed Project will not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site.Therefore, impacts will be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: Hydro; PWQMP—Appendix F) ii). Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or offsite; (Less than Significant Impact) As described in Item X.c.ii. above, the Proposed Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the Project Site. The drainage area will have an increased impervious area from existing conditions and will result in slightly higher peak runoff values. The increase in peak runoff shall be mitigated to a level at or below existing levels through the use of underground infiltration basins, catch basins, and outlet structures as outlined in the Preliminary Drainage Report prepared by SB&O, Inc.The catch basin can store the anticipated volume from a 100-year, 24-hour storm event. The catch basin will also have sufficient capacity to alleviate the expected increase in runoff, retaining the peak flow within the private street and eliminating offsite flow to Lakeshore Drive. Thus, no flooding on or off-site as a result of the proposed Project will occur. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: Hydro; PWQMP—Appendix F) iii). Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or; (Less than Significant Impact) The proposed underground infiltration basins would retain and treat runoff from the Project Site. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 81 of 109 Non-structural BMPs such as activity restrictions, basin inspection,street sweeping, and common area landscape maintenance and litter control would also contribute towards runoff control and water quality protection. In addition,the Proposed Project would be required to comply with the NPDES permit requirements to reduce any potential water quality impacts.The Proposed Project would not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of the drainage systems or provide additional sources of polluted runoff. The amount of water runoff is not expected to exceed stormwater drainage capacity. The Property Owner/Developer shall prepare a SWPPP for construction activity associated with the Proposed Project. The SWPPP shall be maintained at the construction site for the entire duration of construction.The objectives of the SWPPP are to identify pollutant sources that may affect the quality of storm water discharge and to implement BMPs to reduce pollutants in storm water discharges during construction and post construction in compliance with NPDES. Projects that comply with NPDES standards would result in a less than significant impact. In addition, storm drains located within the City limits are maintained by the City as well as by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. Storm runoff within the City is generally intercepted by a network of City facilities and then conveyed into regional facilities. All downstream conveyance channels that would receive runoff from the Project Site are engineered and regularly maintained to ensure flow capacity. Therefore, potential impacts associated with runoff would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR, PWQMP—Appendix F) iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? (Less than Significant Impact) According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the majority of the proposed Project site is within Zone X (containing a small portion along the proposed Project site's western property line within the 0.2% annual chance of flood hazard zone) and is not within a 100-year flood hazard area.The Proposed Project has been designed to include drainage basins that would reduce post-development runoff rates in accordance with the requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore and Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. Because the Proposed Project has been designed to attenuate post-development runoff from the site, Project-related runoff would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in downstream areas in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site. Additionally, the Proposed Project would not impede or redirect flood flows. Therefore, potential impacts associated with flood flows would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: FEMA, PWQMP—Appendix F) d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 82 of 109 inundation? (Less than Significant Impact) According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the majority of the proposed Project site is within Zone X (containing a small portion along the proposed Project site's western property line within the 0.2% annual chance of flood hazard zone) and is not within a 100-year flood hazard area. According to the Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report prepared for the Project by CW Soils, the proposed Project site is not located within a coastal area. Therefore, tsunamis (seismic sea waves) are not considered to be a significant hazard at the site. Seiches are large waves generated in enclosed bodies of water in response to ground shaking. The Project Site is surrounded by a relatively flat and urbanized area. The Project Site is located approximately 0.9 miles northeast of Lake Elsinore, which lacks significant potential for a damaging seiche because of its low depth, and presence of flood control devices constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, including the berm fill at the southern end of the lake. The Project Site is located at least 25 miles from the ocean and approximately 1,267 feet above mean sea level (MSL). Due to the location of the Project Site, and topography of the surrounding locale, it is also not likely that mudflows would inundate the site. Therefore, no impacts associated with inundation by flood, tsunami, or seiche would occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: FEMA, General Plan EIR, Geotechnical Report—Appendix C) e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? (Less than Significant Impact) The Project Site is located within the Santa Ana River watershed, which is regulated by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB).The RWQCB has developed a "Water Quality Control Plan" for the Santa Ana River Basin (herein, "Basin Plan"). The Basin Plan establishes water quality standards for the ground and surface waters of the region.The Basin Plan includes an implementation plan describing the actions by the RWQCB and others that are necessary to achieve and maintain the water quality standards. The RWQCB regulates waste discharges to minimize and control their effects on the quality of the region's ground and surface water. Permits are issued under several programs and authorities. The terms and conditions of these discharge permits are enforced through a variety of technical, administrative, and legal means. The RWQCB ensures compliance with the Basin Plan through its issuance of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permits, issuance of Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR), and Water Quality Certifications pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). In conformance with these requirements, the Applicant has prepared a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), included as Appendix E, which demonstrates that the Proposed Project's drainage plan would meet all applicable requirements of the Basin Plan, including requirements and conditions of approval associated with NPDES permits, issuance of WDRs, and Water Quality Certifications. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not conflict with the Basin Plan,and potential impacts associated with implementation of a water quality control plan would Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 83 of 109 be less than significant. According to General Plan EIR, the Project Site is located within the Elsinore Groundwater Management Zone (GMZ). Since the City has a large amount of vacant land, substantial changes to recharge systems could occur from development of the vacant parcels. In order to reduce pollutants, the City has implemented policies to minimize pollutants in the local and regional waterways, which includes water that percolates into the groundwater through Water Resources Policies 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3. Water Resources Policies 4.1 and 4.2 require development projects to acquire a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and implement Best Management Practices (BMPs)to reduce pollutants. Water Resources Policy 4.3 requires the City to review future development project's beneficial uses during the environmental review stage. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not conflict with any sustainable groundwater management plans, and potential impacts associated with implementation of a groundwater management plan would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR, PWQMP—Appendix F) XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING a) Physically divide an established community? (No Impact) The Project Site is currently zoned Limited Manufacturing (M-1) and is surrounded by Limited Manufacturing (M-1), Commercial Manufacturing (C-M), and Public/Institutional (PI) zoning designations. The Zoning Code divides the City into districts, or zones, and regulated land use activity in each district, specifying the permitted uses of land and buildings, density, bulk, and other regulations. The Proposed Project would construct an industrial business on an undeveloped parcel surrounded by other commercial and industrial development. The Project Site does not contain any existing residential or community structures and is in the Business District. The Proposed Project would not include any changes to the existing circulation network that would divide an existing community. Therefore, no impacts associated with the division of an established community would occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR, Zoning Map) b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (No Impact) The General Plan Land Use Designation of the Project Site is Limited Industrial (LI) and it is zoned Limited Manufacturing (M-1). The LI designation provides for industrial parks, warehouses, Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 84 of 109 manufacturing, research and development, public and quasi-public uses, and similar and compatible uses.The Proposed Project, which includes the construction of three (3) buildings for warehousing and manufacturing, is consistent and compatible the LI Land Use Designation. The proposed warehousing and manufacturing use is a permitted use in the (M-1) Zone. The Proposed Project is consistent with all applicable existing and planned land use policies and regulations of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the General Plan.The Project will not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR, General Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Map) XII. MINERAL RESOURCES a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Less than Significant Impact) The County's principal mineral resources include clay, limestone, iron ore, sand, and construction aggregate.As of 2010, six mines were active in the Lake Elsinore area, producing clay, stone/rock, and sand and gravel. Decomposed granite has also been mined in the Lake Elsinore area in recent years. According to Figure 3.12-1 of the General Plan EIR, the proposed Project site is located within the Mineral Resource Zone 3 Area (MRZ-3), or areas containing mineral deposits, the significance of which cannot be evaluated from available data. Historical site utilization research indicates the subject property was undeveloped from at least 1938 until 2005. Light agricultural use is evident on air photos in the 1940s and 1950s. From 2009 until 2010, the property was utilized as a contractor's storage yard. The property is currently vacant. No mineral extraction has been documented on the site. Given the size and location of the Project site in relationship to surrounding urban uses, it is highly unlikely that any surface mining or mineral recovery operation could feasibly take place in the Project area. Additionally, the City's General Plan delineates mining operations areas by an overlay land use for mining purposes. The proposed Project is not within the Extractive Overlay of the General Plan Land Use Map. Therefore, the proposed Project will have less than significant impacts in regards to the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR; General Plan LU Map) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (No Impact) As discussed in Item Xll.a above, the City's General Plan delineates mining operations areas by Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 85 of 109 an overlay land use for mining purposes.The proposed Project is not within the Extractive Overlay of the General Plan Land Use Map. Thus, the proposed Project will not result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR; General Plan LU Map) XIII. NOISE a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or other applicable standards of other agencies? (Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated) A Noise Impact Analysis, prepared by Urban Crossroads dated July 23, 2019 (Appendix G) was completed to determine potential impacts to noise associated with the development of the Proposed Project. The following section calculates the potential noise emissions associated with the construction and operations of the Proposed Project and compares the noise levels to the City standards. Operational Impacts The operation of the Proposed Project may generate noise levels that exceed City standards at the existing nearby sensitive receptors. The operation of the Proposed Project may create an increase in noise levels from roof-top air conditioning units, idling trucks, delivery truck activities, backup alarms, as well as loading and unloading of dry goods, and parking lot vehicle movements all operating simultaneously. To demonstrate compliance with local noise regulations,the Project-only operational noise levels were evaluated against exterior noise level thresholds of the City of Lake Elsinore.Table 7 shows the operational noise levels associated with the Pennington Industrial Project will satisfy the daytime and nighttime exterior noise level standards at the nearby receiver locations. All other receiver locations are shown to experience operational noise levels below the exterior noise level standards. Therefore, the project impact from operational noise will be less than significant. Table 7: Unmitigated Operational Noise Level Compliance Noise Level at Receiver Locations(dBA)2 Receiver Land Threshold Location' Use 1.5o 1.25 L$ L2 Lmax Exceeded?3 (30 mins) (15 mins) (5 mins) (1 min) (<1 min) Daytime Residential 50 60 65 70 75 - Nighttime Standards 40 55 60 65 70 - Daytime 60 65 70 75 80 - Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 86 of 109 Nighttime Public Space 55 60 65 70 75 - R1 Residential 28.0 29.7 31.4 32.5 35.9 No R2 Public 47.5 50.3 54.7 58.5 63.9 No R3 Public 41.4 43.2 45.1 46.6 49.7 No See Exhibit 7-A for the receiver and noise source locations. Estimated unmitigated Project operational noise levels as shown on Table 7-2. s Do the estimated Project operational noise levels meet the operational noise level standards(Table 3-1)? Construction Impacts Noise generated by the Project construction equipment will include a combination of trucks, power tools, concrete mixers, and portable generators that when combined can reach high levels. The number and mix of construction equipment is expected to occur during site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating. The construction noise analysis shows that the highest construction noise levels will occur when construction activities take place at the closest point from primary Project construction activity to each of the nearby receiver locations.As shown on Table 8,the unmitigated construction noise levels are expected to range from 38.7 to 72.9 dBA Leq at the receiver locations. To evaluate whether the Project will generate potentially significant short-term noise levels at off-site sensitive receiver locations the City of Lake Elsinore stationary construction equipment noise level standards of 60 dBA Leq for residential and 70 dBA Leq for public (e.g., school) uses, are used as the acceptable construction noise thresholds at the nearby sensitive receiver locations since Project construction will occur for greater than 10 consecutive days. Table 8: Unmitigated Construction Equipment Noise Level Summary Receiver Construction Stage Hourly Noise Level(dBA Leq) Locations Highest Site Building Architectural Grading Paving Noise Preparation Construction Coating Levels' R1 38.7 48.0 42.7 40.4 42.0 48.0 R2 63.6 72.9 67.6 65.3 66.9 72.9 R3 63.6 72.9 67.6 65.3 66.9 72.9 'Noise receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 8-A. 2 Estimated construction noise levels during peak operating conditions. Table 9 shows the highest construction noise levels at the potentially impacted receiver locations are expected to approach 72.9 dBA Leq at receiver locations R2 and R3, and therefore, will potentially exceed the 70 dBA Leq threshold at occupied school uses represented by R2 and R3. The noise impact due to unmitigated Project construction noise levels is, therefore, considered a potentially significant impact at receiver locations R2 and R3. This potentially significant impact is due to large, or heavy, mobile equipment associated with the grading stage of Project construction. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 87 of 109 Table 9: Unmitigated Construction Equipment Noise Level Compliance Receiver Land Use Highest Threshold Threshold Location' Category Construction (dBA Le4)3 Exceeded?4 Activity Noise Levels(dBA LeJ' R1 Residential 48.0 60 No R2 School 72.9 70 Yes R3 School 1 72.9 1 70 1 Yes Noise receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 8-A. Estimated construction noise levels during peak operating conditions,as shown on Tables 8-7. s Construction noise level thresholds by land use category. °Do the estimated Project construction noise levels meet the construction noise level thresholds? MM NOI 1 would require a minimum 90-foot buffer for large mobile equipment (greater than 80,000 pounds), loaded trucks, and jackhammers is required to reduce the Project construction noise level impacts at R2 and R3 (southwest property line). Table 10 shows the mitigated Project construction noise levels due to grading, with the 90-foot buffer, would result in noise levels approaching 63.4 dBA Leq at receiver locations R2 and R3, which are below the 70 dBA Leq exterior noise level threshold at public land uses, and as such,would result in less than significant noise impacts with mitigation. Table 10: Mitigated Grading Equipment Noise Levels Reference Reference Construction Activityl Noise Level @ 50 Feet (dBA Leq) Truck Pass-Bys& Dozer Activity 59.2 Dozer Activity 64.2 Rough Grading Activities 73.5 Highest Reference Noise Level at 50 Feet: 73.5 Distance to Distance Estimated Construction Receiver Construction Attenuation Noise Barrier Noise Level Location Activity(Feet)2 (dBA)3 At(ednBuAation (dBA Leq) R1 943' -25.5 0.0 48.0 R2 90, -5.1 -5.0 63.4 R3 90, -5.1 -5.0 1 63.4 'Reference construction noise level measurements taken by Urban Crossroads,Inc. z Distance from the nearest point of construction activity to the nearest receiver with the minimum 90-foot buffer zone for large mobile equipment(>80,000 Ibs). s Point(stationary)source drop off rate of 6.0 dBA per doubling of distance. °Estimated barrier attenuation from existing barriers in the Project study area. Mitigation Measures: MM NOI 1: Construction Buffer. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Property Owner/Developer shall include a note on the grading and building plans that no large mobile equipment (greater than 80,000 pounds), loaded trucks, and jackhammers shall be operated within 90 feet of the southwest property line. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 88 of 109 (Sources: Noise Impact Analysis—Appendix G, LEMC) b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated) Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment and methods used, distance to the affected structures and soil type. It is expected that ground-borne vibration from Project construction activities would cause only intermittent, localized intrusion. The proposed Project's construction activities most likely to cause vibration impacts are: • Heavy Construction Equipment: Although all heavy mobile construction equipment has the potential of causing at least some perceptible vibration while operating close to buildings, the vibration is usually short-term and is not of sufficient magnitude to cause building damage. • Trucks: Trucks hauling building materials to construction sites can be sources of vibration intrusion if the haul routes pass through residential neighborhoods on streets with bumps or potholes. Repairing the bumps and potholes generally eliminates the problem. Based on the reference vibration levels provided by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Project-related construction vibration velocity levels are expected to approach 0.048 in/sec root- mean-square (RMS) at the nearby receiver locations at distances ranging from 30 to 943 feet, as shown on Table 11. Based on the City of Lake Elsinore vibration threshold of 0.01 in/sec RMS,the construction-related vibration impacts are considered potentially significant impact at receiver locations R2 and R3. Table 11: Unmitigated Construction Equipment Vibration Levels Distance Receiver PPV Levels(in/sec)2 RMS Receiver to Const. Small Large Peak Velocity Threshold Threshold Location Activity Bulldozer .lack- Loaded Bulldozer Vibration Levels (RMS) Exceeded?4 (Feet) (<80k Ibs) hammer Trucks (>80k Ibs) (PPV) (in/sec)3 R1 943' 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.01 No R2 1 30' 1 0.002 0.027 0.058 0.068 0.068 1 0.048 0.01 Yes R3 30' 0.002 0.027 0.058 0.068 0.068 0.048 0.01 Yes 1 Receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 8-A of the NIA. 2 Based on the Vibration Source Levels of Construction Equipment included on Table 8-10 of NIA. 3 Vibration levels in PPV are converted to RMS velocity using a 0.71 conversion factor identified in the Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual,September 2013. 'Does the peak vibration exceed the maximum acceptable vibration threshold shown on Table 3-4 of the NIA? MM NOI 1 would require a minimum 90-foot buffer for large mobile equipment (greater than 80,000 pounds), loaded trucks, and jackhammers is required to reduce the Project construction noise level impacts at R2 and R3 (southwest property line). With the mitigation measures identified herein,the vibration levels would be reduced to 0.009 in/sec RMS at receiver locations R2 and R3,as shown on Table 12, and the impact due to Project construction would be considered a less than significant impact with mitigation for the adjacent receiver locations(R2 and R3)which represent the Keith McCarthy Academy and school use. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 89 of 109 Table 12: Mitigated Construction Equipment Vibration Levels Buffer Mitigated Receiver PPV Levels(in/sec)Z RMS Receiver Distance Velocity Threshold Threshold to Const. Small Large Peak s Location ActivityBulldozer .lack- Loaded Bulldozer Vibration Levels (RMS) Exceeded? (Feet) (<80k Ibs) hammer Trucks (>80k Ibs) (PPV) (in/sec)' R2 90, - 0.005 0.011 0.013 0.013 0.009 0.01 No R3 90, - 0.005 0.011 0.013 0.013 0.009 0.01 No. 1 Receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 8-A of the NIA. Z Based on the Vibration Source Levels of Construction Equipment included on Table 8-10 of NIA. a Vibration levels in PPV are converted to RMS velocity using a 0.71 conversion factor identified in the Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual,September 2013. 'Does the peak vibration exceed the maximum acceptable vibration threshold shown on Table 3-4 of the NIA? Mitigation Measures: MM NOI 1, as defined in Item Xlll.a, above. (Sources: Noise Impact Analysis—Appendix G) C) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (No Impact) The Proposed Project is not be located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport or public use airport. Therefore, no impacts associated with excessive noise in proximity to an airport would occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan) XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (No Impact) The Proposed Project consists of construct three (3) industrial buildings that are 91,140 square foot (SF) in total, which may directly induce growth through the addition of new businesses. The population is expected to increase from approximately 38,185 in the City in 2005 to 318,856 in the City and its sphere of influence in 2030. Residents who work within Lake Elsinore are primarily employed in services positions, manufacturing businesses, construction, and retail trade. The Proposed Project would provide employment opportunities for City residents. The Proposed Project would be consistent with the Limited Industrial land use designation contained in the City's General Plan which provides for an estimated 16,424,826 square feet of industrial uses. The Proposed Project comprises approximately 0.6 percent of the City's planned industrial uses. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 90 of 109 The Proposed Project would be also considered infill development and is consistent with surrounding uses. Therefore, no impacts associated with unplanned population growth would occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan Land Use Map, General Plan EIR, Project Description) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (No Impact) The Project Site is currently vacant and would be developed with three (3) buildings intended for industrial use. In addition, the Proposed Project is zoned Limited Manufacturing (M-1) and has a general plan land use designation of Limited Industrial (L-1) and not intended for residential use. Therefore, the development of an industrial use on-site would not result in the displacement of substantial numbers of existing people or housing, which could necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Therefore, no impacts associated with the displacement of substantial numbers of people or housing would occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Map, Project Description) XV. PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? (Less than Significant Impact) The City contracts for fire services from the Riverside County Fire Department and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFire). The nearest fire station is Station #97, located approximately 1.4 miles northeast of the Project Site as shown on Figure 3.14-1 of the General Plan EIR. The fire department currently serves the exiting parcel and the proposed land is consistent with the General Plan. Therefore, the construction of the Proposed Project would not represent a significant increase fire service. Chapter 16.74 of the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code establishes a program for the adoption and administration of development impact fees by the City for the benefit of the citizens whereby as a condition to the issuance of a building permit or certificate of occupancy by the City the Property Owner/Developer would be required to pay development impact fees or provide other Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 91 of 109 consideration to the City for the purpose of defraying the costs of public expenditures for capital improvements (and operational services to the extent allowed by law) which would benefit such new development. Section 16.74.049 includes a "Fire facilities fee" to mitigate the additional burdens created by new development for City fire facilities. Since the Proposed Project does not propose new housing, any impacts would be considered incremental and can be offset through the payment of the appropriate development impact fees. The Proposed Project would also be required to comply with all applicable fire code requirements for construction and access to the site and as such, would be reviewed by the City Fire Department to determine the specific fire requirements applicable to ensure compliance with these requirements. The Proposed Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts related to fire protection. Therefore, potential impacts associated with fire protection would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR Figure 3.14-1 Police and Fire Stations, LEMC) b) Police protection? (Less than Significant Impact) Police protection services are provided by the Lake Elsinore Police Department (LEPD) under contract by the Riverside County Sheriff's Department (RCSD). The Lake Elsinore Police Department/Sheriff's Station is located at 333 Limited Avenue, approximately 1.08 miles southeast of the Project Site. Chapter 16.74 of the City's Municipal Code establishes a program for the adoption and administration of development impact fees by the City for the purpose of defraying the costs of public expenditures for capital improvements (and operational services to the extent allowed by law) which would benefit such new development. The Proposed Project would participate in this development impact fee program to mitigate impacts to police protection resources. Any potential impacts would be considered incremental and can be offset through the payment of the development impact fee. The Proposed Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts related to police protection. Therefore, potential impacts associated with police projection would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR Figure 3.14-1 Police and Fire Stations, LEMC) c) Schools? (Less than Significant Impact) The Project Site is located within the Lake Elsinore Unified School District (LEUSD) which serves most of the City of Lake Elsinore, all of the cities of Canyon Lake and Wildomar, and a portion of unincorporated Riverside County as shown in Figure 3.14-3 of the General Plan EIR. The Property Owner/Developer would be required to pay school impact fees as levied by the LEUSD, which would provide funding for school facilities. Since the Proposed Project does not propose new housing, any potential impacts would be considered incremental and can be offset through the payment of the appropriate development impact fees. The Proposed Project would not result in Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 92 of 109 substantial adverse physical impacts related to schools. Therefore, potential impacts associated with schools would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR Figure 3.14-3 —Schools and District Boundaries) d) Parks? (Less than Significant Impact) Since the Proposed Project does not propose residential uses, a direct increase in park uses is not expected as a result of Project implementation. Indirect impacts to park facilities from commercial development would be the occasional use of a park during a lunch or dinner break. Section 16.34.060 in Chapter 16.34 (Required Improvements) for the City's Municipal Code requires that prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Property Owner/Developer pay fees for the purposes set forth in that section. Paragraph D of Section 16.34.060 describes the City's Park Capital Improvement Fund and describes that the City Council has the option to request dedication for park purposes or in lieu thereof, request that the Property Owner/Developer pay a fee for the purpose of purchasing the land and developing and maintaining the City park system. As is consistent with all commercial projects, the Property Owner/Developer would be required to pay park fees to the City for the purpose of establishing, improving and maintaining park land within the City. Since the Proposed Project does not propose new housing, any potential impacts would be considered incremental and can be offset through the payment of the appropriate park fees. The Proposed Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts related to parks. Therefore, potential impacts associated with parks would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR, LEMC) e) Other public services/facilities? (Less than Significant Impact) The City of Lake Elsinore is part of the Riverside County Library System. The nearest City of Lake Elsinore library to the Project Site is the Lake Elsinore Branch Library at 600 West Graham Avenue, approximately 0.9 miles southeast of the Project Site. Section 16.34.060 in Chapter 16.34 (Required Improvements) of the City's Municipal Code requires that prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Property Owner/Developer pay fees for the purposes set forth in that section. Paragraph B of Section 16.34.060 describes the City's Library Mitigation Fee and states that an in-lieu fee for future construction of library improvements shall be paid to the City to assure the necessary library facilities are provided the community. Since the Proposed Project does not propose new housing, any impacts would be considered incremental and can be offset through the payment of the appropriate library mitigation fees. Therefore, potential impacts associated with libraries would be less than significant. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 93 of 109 Chapter 16.74 of the City's Municipal Code establishes a program for the adoption and administration of development impact fees by the City for the purpose of defraying the costs of public expenditures for capital improvements (and operational services to the extent allowed by law) which would benefit such new development. Section 16.74.048 includes an "Animal shelter facilities fee" to mitigate the additional burdens created by new development for animal facilities. In addition, the Property Owner/Developer would be required to pay City Hall & Public Works fees, Community Center Fees, and Marina Facilities Fees prior to the issuance of building permits. Therefore, potential impacts associated with other public services and facilities would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR, LEMC) XVI. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Less than Significant Impact) The City of Lake Elsinore Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2008 — 2030 establishes a goal of providing five acres of park space per 1,000 residents. The Proposed Project does not include elements (e.g., residential development) that would result in substantial increased demands for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities. Indirect impacts to park facilities from commercial development would be the occasional use of a park during a lunch or dinner break. As shown on Figure 3.15-1 — Parks of the General Plan EIR, there are no parks located within a half mile of the Project Site. Therefore, it is unlikely that the Proposed Project would increase the use of existing parks. As described in Section XIV(d), the Property Owner/Developer would be required to pay park fees to the City for the purpose of establishing, improving and maintaining parkland within the City. Since the Proposed Project does not propose new housing, any impacts would be considered incremental and can be offset through the payment of the appropriate park fees.The Proposed Project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. Therefore, potential impacts associated with parks or recreational facilities would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR Figure 3.15-1 - Parks) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact) Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 94 of 109 The Proposed Project involves the construct three (3) industrial buildings that are 91,140 square foot (SF) in total. The Property Owner/Developer would be required to pay park fees to the City for the purpose of establishing, improving and maintaining park land within the City. The Proposed Project does not include recreational facilities and does not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Therefore, no impacts associated with recreational facilities would occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR, Project Description) XVII. TRANSPORTATION A Traffic Impact Analysis was completed to determine potential impacts to traffic associated with the development of the Proposed Project (Appendix I - Focused Traffic Evaluation, Pennington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, prepared by Urban Crossroads, dated July 29, 2019). On December 28, 2018, updates to the CEQA Guidelines were approved by the Office of Administrative Law (OAL). As part of the updates to the CEQA Guidelines, thresholds of significance for evaluation of impacts to transportation have changed. The CEQA Guidelines update eliminated the threshold of significance for evaluating impacts due to changes to air traffic patterns and consolidated the evaluation of impacts due to a conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs into an analysis of impacts due to a conflict with programs, plans, ordinances, or policies addressing the circulation system (i.e., new Threshold a.). However, new Threshold b. of the CEQA Guidelines for Transportation and Traffic requires an evaluation of impacts due to Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMTs), instead of evaluating impacts based on Level of Service (LOS) criteria, as required by California Senate Bill (SB) 743. LOS has been used as the basis for determining the significance of traffic impacts as standard practice in CEQA documents for decades. In 2013, SB 743 was passed, which is intended to balance the need for LOS for traffic planning with the need to build infill housing and mixed-use commercial developments within walking distance of mass transit facilities, downtowns, and town centers and to provide greater flexibility to local governments to balance these sometimes-competing needs. At full implementation of SB 743, the California Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) is expected to replace LOS as the metric against which traffic impacts are evaluated, with a metric based on VMTs. As a component of OPR's revisions to the CEQA Guidelines in December 2018, lead agencies will be required to adopt VMT thresholds of significance by July 2020. At the time this Initial Study/MND was prepared, a VMT metric was not published by OPR, and the City of Lake Elsinore in its capacity as Lead Agency, as well as surrounding local agencies in which the Proposed Project's traffic would circulate, use LOS as the significance criteria for evaluating a project's traffic impacts. For this reason, a LOS metric and not a VMT metric is appropriately used in this Initial Study/MND. a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 95 of 109 including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) A Focused Traffic Evaluation dated July 29, 2019 was prepared for the Project by Urban Crossroads to evaluate the proposed Project's impacts on traffic. The trips generated by the Project have been estimated based on trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication Trip Generation (10th Edition, 2017). The trip generation rates used to estimate the proposed Project traffic are shown in Table 13. Table 13 also shows the Project trip generation, which consist of 71 trips in the AM peak hour, 78 trips in the PM peak hour, and 455 daily trips (passenger car equivalents). Table 13: Project Trip Generation Summary(06/17/2019) Trip Generation Rates' Land Use ITE LU Quantity' AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Code In Out Total In Out Total Manufacturing 140 91.14 TSF 0.48 0.14 0.62 0.21 0.46 0.67 3.93 80.3%Passenger Cars 0.39 0.11 0.50 0.17 0.37 0.54 3.16 5.2%2-Axle Trucks(PCE=1.5) 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.31 4.5%3-Axle Trucks(PCE=2.0) 0.04 0.01 0.06 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.35 10.0%4-Axle+Trucks(PCE=3.0) 0.14 0.04 0.19 0.06 0.14 0.20 1.18 Trip Generation Results Land Use ITE LU Quantity' AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Code In Out Total In Out Total Manufacturing 140 91.14 TSF Passenger Cars: 35 10 45 15 34 49 288 Truck Trips: 3 1 4 1 3 4 28 2-Axle Trucks 4 1 5 2 4 6 32 3-Axle Trucks 13 4 17 6 13 19 107 4-Axle Trucks TOTAL 55 16 71 24 1 54 j 78 455 'Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE),Trip Generation Manual,10th Edition(2017). 'TSF=Thousand Square Feet 3Vehicle Mix Source: City of Fontana Truck Trip Generation Study for LU 150(Light Warehouse),August 2003. PCE rates are per SANBAG. Project Trip Distribution Trip distribution is the process of identifying the probable destinations,directions or traffic routes that will be utilized by Project traffic. The potential interaction between the planned land uses and surrounding regional access routes are considered, to identify the route where the Project traffic would distribute. The Project trip distribution was developed based on anticipated travel patterns to and from the Project site. The trip distribution pattern is heavily influenced by the geographical location of the site, the location of surrounding uses, and the proximity to the regional freeway system. Appendix H, Exhibit 3 illustrates the Project trip distribution patterns. Approximately fifty percent (50%) of the project traffic is anticipated to travel to and from the northwest, via Chaney Street to/from Collier Avenue. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 96 of 109 Existing Plus Project Traffic Volumes The Existing plus Project (E+P) scenario is intended to identify the significant Project impacts associated with the proposed Project on the existing circulation system.The E+P traffic conditions include existing traffic in addition to the traffic generated by the proposed Project. Appendix H, Exhibit 2 also shows the weekday AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes for Existing (2019) With Project traffic conditions. Opening Year Plus Project Traffic Volumes To provide an assessment of the potential project-related and cumulative traffic impacts, the "buildup" method was used to develop traffic forecasts for Opening Year(2021)traffic conditions for Existing plus Ambient Projects plus Cumulative Projects plus Project (EAPC). The EAPC scenario is intended to identify near-term cumulative impacts on the planned near-term circulation system. The EAPC traffic conditions include background traffic within the study area and the traffic generated by the proposed Project. Future year traffic forecasts have been based upon background (ambient) growth at 4.04% for 2021 traffic conditions (2% per year compounded annually). The ambient growth factor is intended to approximate regional traffic growth. This ambient growth rate is added to existing traffic volumes to account for area-wide growth not reflected by cumulative development projects. Ambient growth has been added to daily and peak hour traffic volumes on surrounding roadways, in addition to traffic generated by the development of future projects that have been approved but not yet built and/or for which development applications have been filed and are under consideration by governing agencies. Intersection Analysis The intersection operations analysis results are summarized in Table 14, which indicates that the intersection of Collier Avenue at Chaney Street is currently operating at acceptable LOS during the peak hours. Traffic signal warrants for Existing traffic conditions are based on existing peak hour intersection turning volumes. The intersection of Collier Avenue at Chaney Street currently warrants a traffic signal for Existing traffic conditions. Table 14: Collier Avenue (NS)/ Chaney Street (EW) Intersection Analysis Results Intersection Approach Lanes' Delay' Level of Traffic Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound (Secs) Service' ANALYSIS SCENARIO Control' L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM Existing(2019)Traffic Conditions CCS 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 27.2 19.5 D C E+P Traffic Conditions CSS 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 28.6 21.4 D C EAPC Traffic Conditions Without Improvements CSS 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 >100 79.9 F F With Improvements TS 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 36.0 25.7 D C 'When a right turn is designated,the lane can either be striped or unstriped.To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L=Left;T=Through;R=Right;1=Improvement 2 Per the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition(HCM6),overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with a traffic signal or all way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control,the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement(or moveme nts sharing a single lane)are shown. Delay and level of service is calculated using Synchro 10.1 analysis software. BOLD=LOS does not meet the applicable jurisdictional requirements(i.e.,unacceptable LOS). 3 CSS=Cross-street Stop;TS=Traffic Signal Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 97 of 109 LOS calculations were conducted to evaluate operations of the intersection of Collier Avenue at Chaney Street under Existing (2019) Plus Project conditions. Table 14 contains the results of this analysis. Collier Avenue at Chaney Street is anticipated to experience acceptable operations for Existing Plus Project conditions. LOS calculations were conducted for Collier Avenue at Chaney Street to evaluate operations under Opening Year (2021) Plus Project conditions. Intersection operations analysis worksheets for EAPC (2021) conditions are included in Attachment 6 of this letter. Table 14 contains the results of this analysis. Collier Avenue at Chaney Street is anticipated to experience deficient operations for Opening Year Plus Project conditions, and a cumulative impact is found. Cumulative traffic impacts are deficiencies that are not directly caused by the Project, but occur as a result of regional growth combined with that or other nearby cumulative development projects or if the Project is anticipated to contribute traffic to a deficient intersection under pre-project conditions. The City of Lake Elsinore has created its own local Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program to impose and collect fees from new residential, commercial and industrial development for the purpose of funding roadways and intersections necessary to accommodate City growth as identified in the City's General Plan Circulation Element.The City's TIF program includes facilities that are not part of, or which may exceed improvements identified and covered by the TUMF program. The intersection of Chaney Street / Collier Avenue, forecasted to be cumulatively impacted by the Project, has planned improvements through the City's TIF Program.The Project will be subject to the City of Lake Elsinore's TIF fee program, and will pay the requisite City of Lake Elsinore TIF fees at the rates then in effect pursuant to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. MM Trans 1 requires the Project to pay its fair-share for the construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Collier Avenue at Chaney Street, combined with a separate northbound left turn lane from Collier Avenue to Chaney Street to address the deficiency for EAPC (2021) traffic conditions. The fair-share calculations for the traffic signal at Collier Avenue and Chaney Street and related northbound left turn improvement indicate that the Project contributes 10.20% in the AM peak hour and 9.15% in the PM peak hour of new vehicle trips to the cumulatively impacted intersection of Collier Avenue at Chaney Street. With this mitigation, the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS D during the AM peak hour and LOS C during the PM peak hour. With implementation of mitigation measure MM Trans 1, impacts to Cumulative Condition will be reduced to less than significant Mitigation Measure: MM Trans 1: Pay Project Fair-Share. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy,the Property Owner/Developer shall pay its fair-share to construct: a) A traffic signal at the intersection of Collier Avenue at Chaney Street. b) A separate northbound left turn lane from Collier Avenue to Chaney Street. (Sources: Focused Traffic Evaluation —Appendix 1) Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 98 of 109 b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated) Each county in California is required to develop a Congestion Management Program (CMP) that analyzes the links between land use, transportation and air quality. The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) is the County of Riverside's Congestion Management Agency. The RCTC prepares and periodically updates the County's CMP to meet federal Congestion Management System guidelines and state CMP legislation. According to Table 2-1-CMP System of Highways and Roadways, in the 2011 Riverside County Congestion Management Program, the RCTC has defined the CMP roadway system in Lake Elsinore to be State Route 74(SR-74) and Interstate 15 (1-15).All local jurisdictions are responsible for determining the impacts of local development/land use decisions on the CMP roadway system. RCTC requires local agencies whose developments impact the CMP system by causing the Level of Service (LOS) on a non-exempt segment to fall to "F" to prepare deficiency plans. The Project facilities will not impact any highways or roadways identified in the current CMP. With MM Trans 1, the Project would not result in an individual or cumulative exceedance of an established level of service standard. Therefore, with respect to a conflict with the applicable CMP, no impact will occur. Mitigation Measure: MM Trans 1, as defined in Item XVll.a, above. (Sources: General Plan EIR; RCTC CMP; Focused Traffic Evaluation —Appendix 1) c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? (Less than Significant Impact) The Proposed Project would not increase hazards due to design features or incompatible uses. The Proposed Project would be consistent with the on-site and surrounding zoning designations, and implementation of the Proposed Project would not introduce incompatible uses to the Project Area. The Proposed Project would not include any offsite features that would extend into the public right-of-way or otherwise interfere with circulation or result in traffic hazards. Therefore, potential impacts associated with hazardous geometric design features would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR; Zoning Map; Focused Traffic Evaluation —Appendix 1) Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 99 of 109 d) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Less than Significant Impact) The Proposed Project would be constructed on a vacant lot on the southwest corner of Chaney Street and Minthorn Street, both of which would be improved to their ultimate right-of-way along the frontage of the Project Site as part of the Proposed Project. The Project Site would be accessible by emergency vehicles at each of its two driveways, one each on Chaney Street and Minthorn Street. The proposed Project is required to comply with the City's development review process including review for compliance with the all applicable fire code requirements for construction and access to the site. The Project will be reviewed by the City Fire Department to determine the specific fire requirements applicable to the Project and to ensure compliance with these requirements. This will ensure that the proposed Project would provide adequate emergency access to and from the site. Further, the City Engineer and the City Fire Department will review any modifications to existing roadways to ensure that adequate emergency access or emergency response would be maintained. Thus, implementation of the proposed Project will not result in inadequate emergency access. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR, Focused Traffic Evaluation —Appendix 1) XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k). (Less than Significant Impact) As noted in Threshold V.a., and V.b., respectively, there were no cultural resources recorded at the Project site by either a records search nor an intensive pedestrian survey. Therefore, impacts to historical resources are a less than significant impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR; Site Visit; Phase I ESA -Appendix C) b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. (Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated) Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), signed into law in 2014, amended CEQA and established new requirements for tribal notification and consultation. AB 52 applies to all projects for which a notice of preparation or notice of intent to adopt a negative declaration/mitigated negative Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 100 of 109 declaration is issued after July 1, 2015. AB 52 also broadly defines a new resource category of tribal cultural resources and established a more robust process for meaningful consultation that includes: • prescribed notification and response timelines; • consultation on alternatives, resource identification, significance determinations, impact evaluation, and mitigation measures; and • documentation of all consultation efforts to support CEQA findings. A tribe must submit a written request to the relevant lead agency if it wishes to be notified of projects within its traditionally and culturally affiliated area. The lead agency must provide written, formal notification to the tribes that have requested it within 14 days of determining that a project application is complete or deciding to undertake a project.The tribe must respond to the lead agency within 30 days of receipt of the notification if it wishes to engage in consultation on the project, and the lead agency must begin the consultation process within 30 days of receiving the request for consultation. Consultation concludes when either 1) the parties agree to mitigation measures to avoid a significant effect, if one exists, on a tribal cultural resource, or 2) a party, acting in good faith and after reasonable effort, concludes that mutual agreement cannot be reached.AB 52 also addresses confidentiality during tribal consultation per Public Resources Code §21082.3(c). On August 28, 2019, the City provided written notification of the Project in accordance with AB 52 to all of the Native American tribes that requested to receive such notification from the City. Of the tribes notified, the Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians, the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians, and the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians requested formal government-to-government consultation under AB 52. The City met with Soboba on October 1, 2019 and with Rincon on October 24, 2019. The Phase I cultural resources inventory of the project indicates that there is very low potential for the inadvertent discovery of cultural resources during groundbreaking activities. The EIC records indicate that no cultural resources have been recorded within the project site, and no resources were identified during the pedestrian survey.The report concluded that given the level of disturbance at the site, it is very unlikely that intact archaeological resources are still present subsurface. On November 7, 2019, the City sent recommended mitigation measures to Pechanga, Rincon and Soboba that address unanticipated discoveries of cultural resources and human remains during groundbreaking activities. Consultation was concluded on November 8, 2019 with Rincon and on December 13, 2019 with both Pechanga and Soboba. As a result of these consultations, with implementation of MM Cul 1 and MM Cul 2 in Section V, Cultural Resources of this Initial Study, AB52 consultation with Rincon, Soboba, and Pechanga have been concluded and potential impacts associated with Tribal Cultural Resources would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: MM Cul 1 and MM Cul 2, as defined in Section V above. (Sources: City of Lake Elsinore; Phase I Cultural Report -Appendix B) Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 101 of 109 XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities,the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Less than Significant Impact) The Proposed Project would be within the service boundary for the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD).The EVMWD issued Service Planning Letter#3223-0 (Appendix J) to the Applicant on May 20, 2019, in which the EVMWD determined that water is available to serve the Proposed Project and the project would need to connect to the sewer mainline in Chaney Street at the manhole in front of the Project. The Proposed Project would be served by the existing water and wastewater treatment facilities, and the Property Owner/Developer would pay all development impacts fees associated with water and wastewater service. Therefore, potential impacts associated with water or wastewater treatment facilities would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR, LEMC, EVMWD Service Planning Letter - Appendix J) b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? (Less than Significant Impact). EVMWD obtains its potable water supplies from imported water from Metropolitan Water District (MWD), local surface water from Canyon Lake, and local groundwater from the Elsinore Basin. According to EVMWD's 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), EVMWD has determined that its current and anticipated future supplies are sufficient to meet the projected dry-year and multiple dry-year demand. The EVMWD issued Service Planning Letter #3223-0 (Appendix 1) to the Applicant on May 20, 2019, in which the EVMWD determined that water is available to serve the Proposed Project and a sewer line extension would be required on Collier Avenue, which would be constructed as part of the Proposed Project. There are sufficient water supplies as well as water shortage contingency plans to protect existing and future water needs within the EVMWD service area. Therefore, potential impacts associated with water supplies would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR, EVMWD Service Planning Letter - Appendix J) c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider,which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (Less than Significant Impact) Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 102 of 109 The EVMWD is responsible for the City's wastewater treatment plant.The EVMWD issued Service Planning Letter #3223-0 (Appendix 1) to the Applicant on May 20, 2019, in which the EVMWD determined that water is available to serve the Proposed Project and a sewer line extension would be required on Collier Avenue, which would be constructed as part of the Proposed Project. The Property Owner/Developer would be required to pay development impacts fees. Therefore, potential impacts associated with wastewater treatment capacity would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: EVMWD Service Planning Letter - Appendix J) d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? (Less than Significant Impact) CR&R, Inc. Environmental Services is the solid waste disposal service provider for the City of Lake Elsinore and parts of Riverside County. Riverside County Department of Waste Resources (RCDWR) facilitates waste management services for Riverside County. These services are provided on a countywide basis, and each private or public entity determines which landfill or transfer station to use,which is mostly based on geographic proximity.The landfills typically used by the City of Lake Elsinore are the El Sobrante, Badlands, and Lamb Canyon Landfills. All three of the landfills are Class III municipal solid waste landfills. El Sobrante Landfill is expected to reach capacity by 2045. Badlands Landfill is expected to reach capacity by 2024 and Lamb Canyon Landfill by 2021. Both Badlands and Lamb Canyon Landfills have the potential to expand their facilities and capacity. Chapter 14.12 of the LEMC requires that project applicant divert a minimum of 50 percent of construction and demolition debris, and the Property Owner/Developer would meet this requirement. The existing landfills have sufficient capacity to serve the Proposed Project, and recycling and green waste collection would reduce overall solid waste generated.Therefore, potential impacts associated with solid waste disposal would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR, LEMC) e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? (Less than Significant Impact) The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939, Sher, Chapter 1095, Statutes of 1989 as amended [IWMAj) under the Public Resource Code requires that local jurisdictions divert at least 50 percent of all solid waste generated by January 1, 2000, and 50%diversion each year following. As of 2006, the City achieved a 50 percent waste diversion rate. In addition, Chapter 14.12 of the LEMC requires that project applicant divert a minimum of 50 percent of Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 103 of 109 construction and demolition debris, and the Property Owner/Developer would meet this requirement. The Proposed Project would comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Therefore, potential impacts associated with solid waste would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: General Plan EIR, PRC, LEMC) XX. WILDFIRES a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (No Impact) b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? (No Impact) c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads,fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? No Impact) d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? (No Impact) According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Riverside County Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps and the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan EIR Figure 3.10-2 (City of Lake Elsinore Wildfire Susceptibility), the Project Site is not located in a High or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.The Project Site is vacant and bound by vacant land to the northwest, south and west and by commercial/industrial uses to the northeast and east. As part of the plan check process, the Project Site plan would undergo a fire, life, and safety review by the City Fire Department to determine the specific fire requirements applicable to ensure compliance with these requirements. Therefore, no impacts associated with wildland fires would occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. (Sources: California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Riverside County Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps, General Plan EIR Figure 3.10-2 - City of Lake Elsinore Wildfire Susceptibility) V. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE The following are Mandatory Findings of Significance in accordance with Section 21083 of CEQA and Section 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 104 of 109 a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? (Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated) As discussed throughout this Initial Study, the proposed Project area contains some sensitive biological resources that could potentially be affected by the proposed Project. All potentially significant impacts to biological resources would be avoided or reduced to a less than significant impact with the implementation of mitigation measures MM Bio 1 through MM Bio 3 identified in this initial study as well as design features and measures already incorporated into the Project. The presence of any previously recorded or potential cultural resources was not found on the proposed Project site. Further, the site has been previously disturbed and it is highly unlikely that any cultural resources exist. However, in order to provide protection in the unlikely event that cultural resources or human remains are unearthed during Project construction, implementation of mitigation measures MM Cul 1 through MM Cul 2 will reduce potential impacts to less than significant. Thus, the proposed Project's will not degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or an endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Therefore, impacts are less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Mitigation Measures: MM Bio 1 through MM Bio 3 and MM Cul 1 through MM Cul 2 (Sources: Above Initial Study) b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? (Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated) The Proposed Project would result in potentially significant project-specific impacts to biological resources, cultural resources, noise, tribal cultural resources, and transportation/traffic impacts. However, all mitigation measures have been identified that would reduce these impacts to less than significant levels. The Air Quality and Transportation/Traffic analyses of this document considered cumulative impacts in their respective analyses, and mitigation measures would be required to reduce cumulative impacts associated with Transportation/Traffic. No additional mitigation measures would be required to reduce cumulative impacts to less than significant Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 105 of 109 levels. Mitigation Measures: MM Trans 1 (Sources: Above Initial Study) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,either directly or indirectly? (Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated) Effects on human beings were evaluated as part of this analysis of this initial study and found to be less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures in biological resources, cultural/paleontological resources, geology and soils, noise, and traffic. With implementation of MM NOI 1, noise will not increase due to the Project. Based on the analysis and conclusions in this initial study, the proposed Project will not cause substantial adverse effects directly or indirectly to human beings. Therefore, potential direct and indirect impacts on human beings that result from the proposed Project are considered less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Mitigation Measures: MM NOI 1 (Sources: Above Initial Study) Pennington Industrial Project - Draft ISIMND (ER 2019-03) Page 106 of 109 VI. PERSONS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONSULTED This section identifies those persons who prepared or contributed to the preparation of this document. This section is prepared in accordance with Section 15129 of the CEQA Guidelines. City of Lake Elsinore Damaris Abraham, Senior Planner Nick Lowe, PE I MS, Consultant Traffic Engineer Dina Purvis, Senior Engineering Technician VII. REFERENCES The following documents were used as information sources during preparation of this document. Except as noted, they are available for public review at the City of Lake Elsinore, Community Development Department, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530, ph. (951) 674-3124. AQ Report Air Quality Impact Analysis, Pennington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, prepared by Urban Crossroads, dated July 10, 2019. (Appendix A) Cultural Report Cultural Resources Inventory for the Pennington Project, Lake Elsinore, California, prepared by DUDEK, dated November 4, 2019 CalRecycle California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, Lake Elsinore Jurisdiction Diversion / Disposal Rate Detail, 2006. (Available at https://www2.caIrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentraI/DiversionProgram/JurisdictionDive rsionPost2006, accessed September 2019.) CAP City of Lake Elsinore, Climate Action Plan, approved December 13, 2011. (Available at http://www.lake-elsinore.org/home/showdocument?id=7249, accessed September 2019.) CCR California Code of Regulations. (Available at https://govt.westlaw.com/calregs/Index?transitionTVpe=Default&contextDat a=%28sc.Default%29, accessed September 2019.) Code of Federal Code of Federal Regulations, Title 49 Transportation. (Available at Regulations http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title49/49tab 02.tpl, accessed September 2019.) DOC California Department of Conservation, California Important Farmland Finder. (Available at https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff/, accessed September 2019.) DOC WA California Department of Conservation, Land Conservation (Williamson) Act, Riverside County Land Conservation Act Map. (Available at ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dIrp/wa/Riverside w 15 16 WA.pdf, accessed September 2019.) Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 107 of 109 DTSC California Department of Toxic Substances Control, EnviroStor Database. (Available at http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/, accessed September 2019.) EVMWD Service Planning Letter#3223-0, Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, May 20, 2019. (Appendix 1) FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Map Number 06065C2036G. (Available at https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search?AddressQuerV=Lake%20EIsinore%2C%20 CA#searchresultsanchor, accessed September 2019.) General Plan City of Lake Elsinore, City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, adopted December 13, 2011. (Available at http://www.lake-elsinore.org/city-hall/city- departments/community-development/planning/lake-elsinore-general-plan, accessed September 2019.) General Plan City of Lake Elsinore, City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Update Final EIR Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report, certified December 13, 2011. (Available at http://www.lake-elsinore.org/city-hall/city- departments/community-development/planning/lake-elsinore-general- plan/general-plan-certified-eir, accessed September 2019.) General Plan City of Lake Elsinore, General Plan Land Use Map, adopted December 13, 2011. LU Map (Available at http://www.lake-elsinore.org/home/showdocument?id=24827, accessed September 2019.) GHG Report Greenhous Gas Analysis, Pennington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, prepared by Urban Crossroads, dated July 10, 2019 (Appendix G) Geotech Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report Proposed Commercial Development, Assessor's Parcel Number 377-160-014, South Corner of Chaney & West Minthorn Streets, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California, prepared by CW Soils, dated February 27, 2019. (Appendix B) Health and California Health and Safety Code. (Available at Safety Code https://Ieginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codesTOCSelected.xhtml?tocCode=HS C, accessed September 2019.) Hydro Preliminary Drainage Report for Pennington Industrial, South Corner of Chaney & West Minthorn Streets, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California, prepared by SB&O Inc., dated May 17, 2019. (Appendix D) LEMC City of Lake Elsinore, Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, 2019. (Available at http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/LakeElsinore/, accessed September 2019.) NIA Noise Impact Analysis, Pennington Industrial, City of Lake Elsinore, prepared by Urban Crossroads, dated July 23, 2019. (Appendix F) P-WQMP Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, Pennington Industrial Park, prepared by SB&O Inc., dated February 27, 2019 (Revised May 17, 2019). (Appendix E) Phase I ESA Environmental Site Assessment-Phase 1, Undeveloped Property,APN:377-160- 014, Southern corner of West Minthorn Street and Chaney Street, Lake Elsinore, California 92530, prepared by California Environmental, dated July 2018. Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 108 of 109 (Appendix C) RC GIS County of Riverside, Riverside County Geographic Information System, Map My County —Riverside County. (Available at https://gis.countyofriverside.us/Htm15Viewer/?viewer=MMC Public, accessed September 2019.) SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities, Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ amended by 2010-0014-DWQ & 2012-0006-DWQ NPDES No. CAS000002, July 17, 2012. (Available at http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water issues/programs/stormwater/docs/c onstpermits/wqo 2009 0009 complete.pdf, accessed September 2019). TIA Focused Traffic Evaluation, Pennington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, prepared by Urban Crossroads, dated July 29, 2019. (Appendix H) WQCPSARB State of California, 1995 Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin, February 2016 (Available at https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/santaana/water issues/programs/basin pl an/index.shtml accessed September 2019.) Zoning Map City of Lake Elsinore, Zoning Map, September 9, 2019. (Available at http://www.lake-elsinore.org/home/showdocument?id=24829, accessed September 2019) Pennington Industrial Project - Draft IS/MND (ER 2019-03) Page 109 of 109 South Coast Air Quality Management District Letter 1 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91 765-4178 (909) 396-2000 • www.agmd.gov SENT VIA E-MAIL AND USPS: January 7, 2020 dabrahamglake-elsinore.org Damaris Abraham, Senior Planner City of Lake Elsinore, Community Development Department 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Mitigated Negative Declaration(MND)for the Proposed Pennington Industrial Project The South Coast Air Quality Management District(South Coast AQMD) staff appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above-mentioned document. The following comments are meant as guidance for the Lead Agency and should be incorporated into the Final MND. South Coast AQMD Staff s Summary of Project Description The Lead Agency proposes to build three industrial buildings totaling 91,140 square feet for manufacturing/warehouse uses with eight dock doors' on 5.01 acres(Proposed Project). At the time of the MND, tenants are unknown. It is anticipated that the Proposed Project would generate approximately 167 1.1 truck trips per day'. Based on a review of Figure 2, Project Site, and aerial photographs, South Coast AQMD staff found that institutional uses including a high school are located immediately west of the Proposed Project. Construction of the Proposed Project is expected to take approximately 12 months to complete'. South Coast AQMD Staff s Summary of Air Qualitysis In the Air Quality Analysis Section, the Lead Agency quantified the Proposed Project's construction and operational emissions and compared those emissions to South Coast AQMD's recommended regional and 1.2 localized air quality CEQA significance thresholds. The Lead Agency found that the Proposed Project's air quality impacts from construction and operational activities would be less than significant. No air quality mitigation measures were proposed. South Coast AQMD Staffs General Comments Although the Proposed Project involves operation of warehouse uses near existing schools, the Lead Agency did not perform a mobile source health risk assessment analysis. Please see the attachment for 1.3 more information. To further reduce the Proposed Project's long-term emissions from mobile sources,the attachment also includes a list of recommended mitigation measures that the Lead Agency should incorporate in the Final MND. Closing Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074, prior to approving the Proposed Project, the Lead Agency shall consider the MND for adoption together with any comments received during the public review process. Please provide the South Coast AQMD with written responses to all comments contained herein 1.4 prior to the adoption of the Final MND. When responding to issues raised in the comments, response should provide sufficient details giving reasons why specific comments and suggestions are not accepted. There should be good faith, reasoned analysis in response. Conclusory statements unsupported by factual ' MND.Page 20. 2 MND.Page 96. 1 MND.Page 18. Damaris Abraham 2 January 7, 2020 information do not facilitate the purpose and goal of CEQA on public disclosure and are not meaningful, informative, or useful to decision makers and the public who are interested in the Proposed Project. 1.4 Further, when the Lead Agency makes the finding that the recommended mitigation measures are not Cont. feasible, the Lead Agency should describe the specific reasons supported by substantial evidence for rejecting them in the Final MND (CEQA Guidelines Sections 15070 and 15074.1). South Coast AQMD staff is available to work with the lead agency to address these issues and any other questions that may arise. Please contact me at lsungagmd.gov if you have any questions regarding the enclosed comments. ISinc--e__rely, �"�` " Lijin Sun,J.D. Program Supervisor, CEQA IGR Planning,Rule Development&Area Sources Attachment LS RVC 191227-06 Control Number Damaris Abraham 3 January 7, 2020 ATTACHMENT Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment(HRA)Analysis 1. Sensitive receptors are people that have an increased sensitivity to air pollution or environmental contaminants. Sensitive receptors include schools, daycare centers, nursing homes, elderly care facilities, hospitals, and residential dwelling units. As stated above, the Proposed Project involves operation of manufacturing/warehouse uses, which are expected to generate approximately 167 truck trips per day . Based on a review of Figure 2, Project Site, and aerial photographs, South Coast AQMD staff found that institutional uses including a high school are located immediately west of the Proposed Project. Surrounding sensitive receptors (e.g., students) would be exposed to diesel particulate matter (DPM) from the transportation and idling of trucks visiting the Proposed Project during operation. DPM has been identified by the California Air Resources Board(CARB) as a toxic air contaminant (TAC) based on its carcinogenic effects'. However, upon review of the MND, South Coast AQMD staff found that the Lead Agency did not perform a quantitative mobile source HRA analysis. One of the basic purposes of CEQA is to inform decision-makers and the public about the potential, significant environmental effects of proposed activities (CEQA Guidelines Section 15002(a)(1)). A mitigated negative declaration is appropriate when the Lead Agency finds that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment after incorporating mitigation measures (CEQA Guidelines Sections 15070 to 15075). Reasons to support this finding shall be documented as substantial evidence in the initial study. Without quantifying the Proposed Project's long-term health risk impacts on nearby sensitive receptors during operation, the MND has not made that documentation. Therefore, South Coast AQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency perform a mobile source HRA analysis' in the Final MND and compare the results to South Coast AQMD's CEQA significance threshold of 10 in one million for cancer risk 7. An analysis of all toxic air contaminant impacts due to the use of equipment potentially generating air pollutants should also be included. Guidance Regarding Warehouses Sited Near Sensitive Receptors 2. South Coast AQMD staff recognizes that there are many factors Lead Agencies must consider when making local planning and land use decisions. To facilitate stronger collaboration between Lead Agencies and South Coast AQMD to reduce community exposure to source-specific and cumulative air pollution impacts, South Coast AQMD adopted the Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning' in 2005. Additional guidance is available in the CARB's Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, available at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf. For warehouses that accommodate more than 100 trucks per day, or more than 40 trucks with operating TRUs per day, a 1,000-foot separation between sensitive land uses (e.g., schools)' and the operating warehouse is recommended. Therefore, South a MND.Page 96. s CARB.August 27, 1998.Resolution 98-35.Accessed at:htip://www.arb.ca. og v/re,gact/diesltac/diesltac.htm. 6 South Coast AQMD. Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risk from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis. Accessed at: http://www.agmd.gov/home/re,gulations/ceqa/air-quality-analysis- handbook/mobile-source-toxics-analysis. 7 South Coast AQMD has developed the CEQA significance threshold of 10 in one million for cancer risk. When South Coast AQMD acts as the Lead Agency, South Coast AQMD staff conducts a HRA, compares the maximum cancer risk to the threshold of 10 in one million to determine the level of significance for health risk impacts,and identifies mitigation measures if the risk is found to be significant. 8 South Coast AQMD.May 2005. Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning. Accessed at:http://www.agmd.,gov/home/library/documents-support-material/planning-guidance/guidance-document. 9 CARB. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. Page 4. Accessed at: btips://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf Damaris Abraham 4 January 7, 2020 Coast AQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency review and consider these guidance documents when making local planning and land use decisions. Recommended Mitigation Measures during Operation 3. CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation measures that go beyond what is required by law be utilized to minimize or eliminate any significant adverse air quality impacts. While the Lead Agency found that the Proposed Project's long-term operational impacts would be less than significant, South Coast AQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency incorporate the following mitigation measures in the Final MND to further reduce the Proposed Project's emissions, particularly from NOx. For more information on potential mitigation measures as guidance to the Lead Agency, please visit South Coast AQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook website10 Mitigation Measures for Operational Air Quality Impacts from Mobile Sources a) Require the use of zero emission (ZE) or near-zero emission (NZE) heavy-duty trucks during operation, such as trucks with natural gas engines that meet CARB's adopted optional NOx emission standard of 0.02 grams per brake horsepower-hour (g/bhp-hr). At a minimum, require that operators of heavy-duty trucks visiting the Proposed Project during operation commit to using 2010 model year" or newer and cleaner engines that meet CARB's 2010 engine emission standards of 0.01 g/bhp-hr for particulate matter (PM) and the CARB's adopted optional NOx emission standard of 0.20 g/bhp-hr for NOx emissions. Include analyses to evaluate and identify sufficient power available for ZE trucks and supportive infrastructures in the Energy and Utilities and Service Systems Sections of the Final MND,where appropriate. To monitor and ensure ZE,NZE, or 2010 model year trucks are used at the Proposed Project, the Lead Agency should require that operators maintain records of all trucks associated with the Proposed Project's operation and make these records available to the Lead Agency upon request. The records will serve as evidence to prove that each truck called to the Proposed Project during operation meets the minimum 2010 model year engine emission standards. Alternatively, the Lead Agency should require periodic reporting and provision of written records by operators and conduct regular inspections of the records to the maximum extent feasible and practicable. b) Create a buffer zone of at least 300 meters (roughly 1,000 feet), which can be office space, employee parking, greenbelt, etc. between the Proposed Project and sensitive receptors (e.g., students),where feasible. c) Design the Proposed Project such that entrances and exits are such that trucks are not traversing past residences and schools, and other sensitive receptors near the Proposed Project. d) Design the Proposed Project such that any check-in point for trucks is well inside the Proposed Project site to ensure that there are no trucks queuing outside of the facility and ensure that truck traffic within the Proposed Project site is located away from the property line(s) closest to the sensitive receptors(e.g., students),which are located immediately west of the Proposed Project. io South Coast AQMD.htW://www.agmd.eov/home/regulations/cega/air-quality-analysis-handbook. CARB adopted the statewide On-Road Truck and Bus Regulation in 2010.The Regulation requires diesel trucks and buses that operate in California to be upgraded to reduce emissions.Newer heavier trucks and buses must meet particulate matter filter requirements beginning January 1, 2012. Lighter and older heavier trucks must be replaced starting January 1, 2015. By January 1,2023,nearly all trucks and buses will need to have 2010 model year engines or equivalent.More information on the CARB's Truck and Bus Regulations is available here:hops://www.arb.ca. og v/mmrog/onrdiesel/onrdiesel.htm. Damaris Abraham 5 January 7, 2020 e) Limit the daily number of truck trips allowed at the Proposed Project to the level that was analyzed in the Final MND (e.g., 167 daily truck trips). If higher daily truck volumes are anticipated during operation than what were analyzed in the adopted Final MND, the Lead Agency should commit to re-evaluating the Proposed Project's air quality and health risks impacts through a CEQA process prior to allowing higher truck activity levels (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162). f) Require trucks to use the truck routes that are used to analyze the air quality and HRA impacts in the Final MND. g) Have truck routes clearly marked with trailblazer signs, so that trucks will not enter residential and/or school areas that are adjacent to portions of the designated truck routes analyzed in the Final MND. h) Restrict overnight truck parking in residential areas and/or outside schools. Establish parking within the Proposed Project where trucks can rest overnight. i) Establish area(s)within the Proposed Project site for repair needs and ensure that these designated areas are away from any sensitive land uses. j) Require at least five percent of all vehicle parking spaces include electric vehicle (EV) charging stations, or at a minimum, require the Proposed Project to be constructed with the appropriate infrastructure to facilitate sufficient electric charging for trucks to plug-in. Electrical hookups should be provided at the onsite truck stop for truckers to plug in any onboard auxiliary equipment. Electrical panels should be appropriately sized to allow for future expanded use. The Lead Agency should also include analyses to evaluate and identify sufficient power available for zero emission trucks and supportive infrastructures (e.g., EV charging stations) in the Energy and Utilities and Service Systems Sections of the Final MND,where appropriate. Mitigation Measures for Operational Air Quality Impacts from Area Sources k) Maximize the use of solar energy including solar panels. Installing the maximum possible number of solar energy arrays on the building roofs and/or on the Proposed Project site to generate solar energy for the facility and/or EV charging stations. 1) Require the use of electric landscaping equipment, such as lawn mowers and leaf blowers. m) Require use of electric or alternatively fueled sweepers with HEPA filters. n) Maximize the planting of trees in landscaping and parking lots. o) Use light colored paving and roofing materials. p) Utilize only Energy Star heating, cooling, and lighting devices, and appliances. South Coast AQMD Permits and Responsible Agency 4. The Proposed Project includes operation of manufacturing/warehouse uses. In the event that a permit from South Coast AQMD is required, South Coast AQMD should be identified as a Responsible Agency for the Proposed Project in the Final MND. Any assumptions used in the Air Quality Analysis in the Final MND will be used as the basis for permit conditions and limits for the Proposed Project. Generally, operation of portable engines and portable equipment units of 50 horsepower(hp) Damaris Abraham 6 January 7, 2020 or greater that emit particulate matter require a permit from South Coast AQMD or registration with the Portable Equipment Registration Program (PERP) through CARB12. The Lead Agency should consult with South Coast AQMD's Engineering and Permitting staff to determine if the Proposed Project will involve uses of equipment requiring a South Coast AQMD permit or if registration under the PERP through CARB13. Should there be any questions on permits,please contact the South Coast AQMD's Engineering and Permitting staff at (909) 396-3385. For more general information on permits, please visit South Coast AQMD's webpage at: http://www.agmd.gov/home/permits. For more information on the PERP Program, please contact CARB at (916) 324-5869 or visit CARB's webpage at: hgps://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/pro rags ms/portable-equipment-registration-pro.rg am- PM iz South Coast Air Quality Management District. Portable Equipment Registration Program (PERP). Accessed at: htlp://www.agmd.gov/home/permits/equipment-registration/pelp. is Ibid. Pagel of 8 it0 M nta��4 tie - s's C � is a 0 Letter 2 Green Jobs d Chan Communities P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877 January 17, 2020 VIA EMAIL Damaris Abraham, Senior Planner Community Development Department City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 dabrahamglake-elsinore.org SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON PENNINGTON INDUSTRIAL PROJECT MND (SCH NO. 2019129075) To whom it may concern: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Mitigated Negative Declaration(MND) for the proposed Pennington Industrial Project. Please accept and consider these comments on behalf of Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance. Also, Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance 2.1 formally requests to be added to the public interest list regarding any subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project. Send all communications to Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877. I. SUMMARY As we understand it, the project proposes the development of three industrial buildings that are 91,140 square foot (SF) in total with 167 parking spaces on an approximately 5.01 acre vacant 2.2 site. Building 1 will have 32,940 SF gross floor area and three truck loading dock doors, Building 2 will have 39,000 SF gross floor area and three truck loading dock doors, and Building Page 2 of 8 3 will have 19,200 SF gloss floor area and two truck loading dock doors. Each building will consist of a planned open warehouse with truck access doors and a planned office area with mezzanine level. The Proposed Project would have a 0.44 floor area ratio (FAR) and 41 percent lot coverage. The maximum height of the buildings would be 30 feet. 2.2 Cont. Discretionary actions required to implement the proposed project include: 1. Tentative Parcel Map (TPM No. 37710) to subdivide the 5.01 gross acre site into three parcels that are 1.06 acres, 1.72 acres, and 2.01 acres. 2. Industrial Design Review (IDR No. 2019-01) to construct three industrial buildings that are 91,140 sftotal. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project Description describes the proposed use as "planned open warehouse." Throughout the MND, it is unclear if the proposed use is manufacturing or warehousing. For example, the Air Quality Analysis (AQA) and Transportation Analysis model all three buildings as manufacturing use only. The Land Use and Planning Analysis describes the use as both warehouse and manufacturing. The Greenhouse Gas Analysis (GHG) describes it as "a 2.3 warehouse use that will serve mid-stream functions in the goods movement chain between manufacturers and consumers," and analyzes the project accordingly. The MND is internally inconsistent because it analyzes different types of proposed uses for various environmental impacts. A project EIR must be prepared which provides a consistent environmental analysis of that accurately represents the proposed project. III.AIR QUALITY The MND describes the proposed project for analysis as a as manufacturing use only. This differs from the Project Description which describes the use as an open warehouse, the Land Use and Planning Analysis which describes the use as both warehouse and manufacturing, and the 2.4 Greenhouse Gas Analysis which models all three buildings as a warehousing use only. A project EIR must be prepared which consistently models the proposed project as the same type of use in order to adequately and accurately analyze all potentially significant environmental impacts. Section 17.176.080 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code permits construction activity between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. Monday through Saturday. The MND does not provide a 2.5 "worst-case scenario' analysis of construction equipment emitting pollutants for the legal 12 hours per day, 6 days per week. It is legal for construction to occur for much longer hours (12 Page 3 of 8 hours per day permitted while 8 hours per day analyzed) and an additional day (6 days per week permitted while 5 days per week analyzed) than modeled in the Air Quality Analysis. An EIR must be prepared with revised Air Quality modeling to account for these legally possible longer construction days and increased number of construction days. If shorter hours of construction 2.5 are proposed, this must be included as an enforceable mitigation measure with field verification Cont. by an enforcement entity of the lead agency(CEQA§ 21081.6 (b)). The CalEEMod output sheets indicate that the vendor trip length is 6.90 miles for all phases of construction. The MND does not provide information regarding where the construction materials are coming from or if they are all coming from the same location during all phases. The CalEEMod output sheets also rely on trip generation from the Focused Traffic Evaluation, 2.6 which presents trip generation in passenger car equivalents (PCE). The AQA must be revised to utilize the actual quantity of truck trips and model them as truck trips instead of PCE to accurately account for the potentially significant environmental impacts of individual truck trips. There is also no indication that offsite improvements (streets, streetlights, striping, and connection to sewer, water, and utilities) are included for analysis. Additionally, at least 50% of any proposed warehouse space must be modeled as refrigerated/cold storage. This is especially necessary because the M-1 Limited Manufacturing Zone permits cold storage by right. An EIR must be prepared for the project which includes a revised Air Quality Analysis (AQA) to present an accurate analysis of the potentially significant impacts. Further, project grading is expected to balance onsite with no required import or export of soils. However, the MND states "there is an on-site man-made detention basin on the northeast corner of the site which will be removed during construction and replaced with on-site catch basins," resulting in paving over the existing detention basin to create a portion of the parking lot. Figure S — Conceptual Grading Plan provided in the MND does not include any meaningful 2.7 information regarding the existing detention basin and the amount of fill required to accommodate the proposed parking stalls. A project EIR must be prepared which includes this information and models the required number of hauling trips during grading to accommodate the necessary soil import/export. The LST analysis arbitrarily utilizes a 279 meter receptor distance for PM10 and PM2.5 impacts because this is the distance of the nearest residential receptor. The nearest non-residential 2.8 receptor is an industrial building 18 meters north of the project site, and a 25 meter receptor distance was utilize for NO2 and CO analysis consistent with SCAQMD methodology. A project EIR must be prepared which also utilizes a 25 meter receptor distance for PM10 and PM2.5 Page 4 of 8 analysis. This is vital because although McCarthy Academy/Ortega High School are sensitive 2'8 receptors adjacent to the project site. In order to adequately and accurately analyze all Cont potentially significant environmental impacts, a 25 meter receptor distance must be utilized for all LST modeling as the project site is immediately adjacent to sensitive receptors. A project EIR must also be prepared to include a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) to analyze construction related and operational stationary and mobile sources of toxic air contaminants (TACs) and particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5). At minimum, the HRA must analyze the following potentially significant health impacts: cancer, non-cancer (such as respiratory 2.9 impairment), acute/short-term and chronic/long-term impacts to the nearest sensitive receptors at McCarthy Academy/Ortega High School and offices to the east and west. Further, the MND does not include for analysis relevant environmental justice issues in reviewing potential impacts, including cumulative impacts from the proposed project. This is especially significant as the surrounding community is highly burdened by pollution. According to CalEnviroScreen 3.0, CalEPA's screening tool that ranks each census tract in the state for pollution and socioeconomic vulnerability, the proposed project's census tract (6065043006) ranks worse than 85% of the rest of the state overall. The surrounding community, including sensitive receptors such as Ortega High School adjacent to the west, bears the impact of multiple 2.10 sources of pollution and is more polluted than average on every pollution indicator measured by CalEnviroScreen. For example, the project census tract has a higher burden of ozone than 82% of the state and more PM 2.5 than 54% of the state. Further, the project's census tract is a diverse community including 63% Hispanic residents, which are especially vulnerable to the impacts of pollution. The community has a high rate of linguistic isolation, meaning 72% of households speak little to no English. The community has a high rate of low educational attainment, meaning 88% of the census tract over age 25 has not attained a high school diploma, which is an indication that they may lack health insurance or access to medical care. Additionally, the surrounding community has a higher proportion of babies born with low birth weights than 84%of the state, which makes those children more 2.11 vulnerable to asthma and other health issues. This is demonstrated by the census tract ranking in the 49th percentile for asthma and containing 18% children under the age of 10 compared to 13% average children under the age of 10 in California. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Page 5 of 8 The project site is located within an MSHCP survey area for burrowing owl. The MND implements Mitigation Measure (MM) Bio 1 to conduct preconstruction focused species surveys for burrowing owl within 30-days prior to any ground-disturbing activities at the project site where suitable habitat is present. The MDN concludes that implementation of MM Bio 1 will 2.12 result in less than significant impacts. However, since the project site is identified as a MSHCP survey area for burrowing owl, a biological survey must be completed in a project EIR. The burrowing owl survey will not be made available for public review through MM Bio 1, which is implementation of the project without CEQA review. An EIR must be prepared for the project which includes a burrowing owl survey. VI. ENERGY The MND concludes that implementation of Project Design Features 1 through 6 will ensure consistency with the applicable measures in the Lake Elsinore Climate Action Plan, resulting in 2.13 less than significant impacts to renewable energy or energy efficiency. However, the MND does not include a list of Project Design Features for reference or consistency analysis. The MND is inadequate as an informational document and a project EIR must be prepared. VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS The MND describes the proposed project for analysis as a "warehouse use that will serve mid- stream functions in the goods movement chain between manufacturers and consumers." This differs from the Project Description which describes the use as an open warehouse, the Air Quality Analysis and Transportation Analysis which model all three buildings as manufacturing 2.14 use only, and the Land Use and Planning Analysis which describes the use as both warehouse and manufacturing. A project EIR must be prepared which consistently models the proposed project as the same type of use in order to adequately and accurately analyze all potentially significant environmental impacts. The MND states here that the project's traffic generation is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual for warehouse and industrial land use categories. This statement is erroneous as the Focused Traffic Evaluation utilized ITE Code 140 2.15 —Manufacturing for analysis. The MND concludes that implementation of Project Design Features 1 through 8 will ensure consistency with the applicable measures in the Lake Elsinore Climate Action Plan, resulting in 2.16 less than significant impacts to Greenhouse Gas Emissions. However, the MND does not Page 6 of 8 include a list of Project Design Features for reference or consistency analysis. The NIND is 2.16 inadequate as an informational document and a project EIR must be prepared. Cont. XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING The MND describes the proposed project for analysis as both warehouse and manufacturing. This differs from the Project Description which describes the use as an open warehouse, the Air Quality Analysis and Transportation Analysis which model all three buildings as manufacturing 2.17 use only, and the Greenhouse Gas Analysis which models all three buildings as a warehousing use only. A project EIR must be prepared which consistently models the proposed project as the same type of use in order to adequately and accurately analyze all potentially significant environmental impacts. XIII. NOISE Exhibit 7-A: Operational Noise Source and Receiver Locations analyzes the impacts of the distribution/warehouse activity (truck loading dock doors) to a sensitive receiver modeled at a distance from 169 feet from the activity, which is much further than the closest point of the 2.18 Ortega High School property line. The Noise Analysis must be revised as part of a project EIR to analyze the impacts associated with the distribution/warehouse activity to the closest point of the Ortega High School property line in order to adequately and accurately analyze all potentially significant noise impacts. The MND attempts to mitigate construction noise impacts by implementing Mitigation Measure NOI 1: MM NOI 1: Construction Buffer. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Property Owner/ Developer shall include a note on the grading and building plans that no large mobile equipment (greater than 80,000 pounds), loaded trucks, and jackhammers shall be operated within 90 feet of the southwest property line. 2.19 This mitigation measure is unenforceable as there is no enforcement entity, field verification, or lead agency oversight component to follow up on the note written on the project plans. This must be revised as part of a project EIR to include consistent and timely verification of compliance by the Lead Agency throughout the duration of project construction, including at minimum sending notification to property owners/occupants at the adjacent properties of the 90 foot buffer requirement and a Lead Agency contact phone number to report violations, and Page 7 of 8 posting signs at the project site with a Lead Agency contact phone number to report violations in 2.19 order to comply with CEQA§ 15126.4 (a)(2). Cont. XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING The MND does not provide any meaningful analysis or supporting evidence to conclude that the project will have no significant impacts to population and housing. The MND simply states the project "would provide employment opportunities for City residents" without citing the City's unemployment rate/available workforce, number of residents with the appropriate skillset, or the 2.20 number of jobs created by the project. The Lake Elsinore General Plan provides employment generation calculations for all types of uses. Limited industrial uses are expected to generate one employee for every 600 square feet of building area. The proposed 91,140 square foot project will generate 152 employees based on the LE General Plan employment generation. A project EIR must be prepared which includes supporting evidence to substantiate the claim that there will be no significant environmental impacts. XVII. TRANSPORTATION The MND describes the proposed project for analysis as a manufacturing use. This differs from the Project Description which describes the use as an open warehouse, the Greenhouse Gas Analysis which models all three buildings as a warehousing use only, and the Land Use and 2.21 Planning Analysis which describes the use as both warehouse and manufacturing. A project EIR must be prepared which consistently models the proposed project as the same type of use in order to adequately and accurately analyze all potentially significant environmental impacts. The Focused Traffic Evaluation did not include any freeway analysis. A project EIR must be revised to include at minimum analysis of the following facilities providing direct access to the project site: Freeway Ramp I-15 at Main Street 2.22 I-15 at Central Avenue Freeway Merge/Diverge I-15 at SR-74 I-15 at SR-91 SR-74 at I-215 Page 8 of 8 This is especially vital for analysis since the I-215 and I-15 provide direct access to the project 2.22 site from the Southern California Logistics Airport and SR-91 provides direct access to the site Cont. from the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, GSEJA believes the MND is flawed and an EIR must be prepared for the proposed project and circulated for public review. Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance requests to be added to the public interest list regarding any subsequent environmental 2.23 documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project. Send all communications to Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877. Sincerely, Board of Directors Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor Jared Blumenfeld, CaIEPA Secretary AIR RESOURCES BOARD Mary D. Nichols, Chair Letter 3 January 21, 2020 Damaris Abraham Senior Planner City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92530 Dear Damaris Abraham: Thank you for providing California Air Resources Board (CARB) staff with the opportunity to comment on the Pennington Industrial Project (Project) Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (ISIMND), State Clearinghouse No. 2019129075. The 3-1 Project consists of the construction and operation of three industrial buildings totaling 91,140 square feet. Once in operation, the Project is projected to introduce an additional 358 total vehicle trips daily, including 288 daily passenger vehicle trips and 70 daily truck trips. The Project is located within the City of Lake Elsinore (City), California, which is the lead agency for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) purposes. Freight facilities, such as warehouse and distribution facilities, can result in high daily volumes of heavy-duty diesel truck traffic and operation of on-site equipment (e.g., forklifts, yard tractors, etc.) that emit toxic diesel emissions and contribute to 3-2 regional air pollution and global climate change. CARB staff has reviewed the IS/MND and is concerned about the air pollution impacts that would result should the City approve the Project. I. The Project Would Increase Exposure to Air Pollution in Disadvantaged Communities The Project, if approved, will expose nearby disadvantaged communities to elevated air pollution. Residences are located immediately east of the Project with the closest residences located approximately 640 feet from the Project's northeastern boundary. In addition to residences, Ortega High School and Lake Elsinore Head Start Kindergarten are both located approximately 330 feet from the Project's southwest boundary. 3-3 Additionally, Southern California Online Academy (a charter high school) is located immediately adjacent to the Project site. The community is surrounded by existing toxic diesel particulate matter (diesel PM) emission sources, which include existing industrial uses and vehicular traffic along Interstate 15 (1-15). Due to the Project's proximity to residences and schools already disproportionately burdened by multiple sources of air pollution, CARB staff is concerned with the potential cumulative health impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Project. arb.ca.gov 1001 1 Street • P.O. Box 2815 • Sacramento, California 95812 (800) 242-4450 Damaris Abraham January 21, 2020 Page 2 The State of California has placed additional emphasis on protecting local communities from the harmful effects of air pollution through the passage of Assembly Bill 617 (AB 617) (Garcia, Chapter 136, Statutes of 2017). AB 617 is a significant piece of air quality legislation that highlights the need for further emission reductions in communities 3-4 with high exposure burdens, like those in which the Project is located. Diesel PM emissions generated during the construction and operation of the Project would negatively impact the community, which is already disproportionally impacted by air pollution from existing industrial uses and 1-15. Through its authority under Health and Safety Code section 39711, the California Environmental Protection Agency (CaIEPA) is charged with the duty to identify disadvantaged communities. CaIEPA bases its identification of these communities on geographic, socioeconomic, public health, and environmental hazard criteria (Health and Safety Code, section 39711, subsection (a)). In this capacity, CaIEPA currently defines a disadvantaged community, from an environmental hazard and socioeconomic 3-5 standpoint, as a community that scores within the top 25 percent of the census tracts, as analyzed by the California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool Version 3.0 (CalEnviroScreen). CalEnviroScreen uses a screening methodology to help identify California communities currently disproportionately burdened by multiple sources of pollution. The census tract containing the Project is within the top 15 percent for Pollution Burdens and is considered a disadvantaged community. Therefore, CARB staff urges the City to ensure that the Project does not adversely impact neighboring disadvantaged communities. 11, The ISIMND Did Not Quantify or Discuss Potential Cancer Risks at Residential and Other Sensitive Receptors in the Vicinity of the Proposed Industrial Buildings The ISIMND concluded that the Project would not expose nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations that would result in a significant impact. The City and applicant reached this conclusion by comparing the Project's stationary operational air pollutant emissions to South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) localized significance thresholds. Since the ISIMND shows the Project's on-site 3-6 operational air pollutant emissions would not exceed SCAQMD's localized significance thresholds, it was concluded that the Project would result in a less than significant impact on public health. This impact conclusion was reached without conducting a health risk assessment (HRA), or any other quantitative analysis. Furthermore, the ISIMND did not explain why an HRA was not prepared for the Project. As required 1 Pollution Burden represents the potential exposures to pollutants and the adverse environmental conditions caused by pollution. Damaris Abraham January 21, 2020 Page 3 under CEQA, the applicant and City must include a quantitative analysis in determining 3-6 the severity of the Project's impact on public health,2 Cont. Since the Project is located near residences and schools already disproportionately burdened by multiple sources of air pollution, CARB staff strongly urges the applicant and City to prepare an HRA for the Project. In doing so, the City must make a reasonable effort to discuss the specifics between the general health effects associated 3-7 with a particular pollutant and the estimated amount of that pollutant the project will likely produce. The HRA prepared in support of the Project should be based on the latest Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) guidance (2015 Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments).3 III. It is Unclear Whether the Proposed Industrial Uses Include Cold Storage Space The air pollutant emissions reported in the ISIMND were estimated under the assumption that the Project would not be used for cold storage. Since the Project description in the ISIMND did not explicitly state that the proposed 91,140 square feet of 3-8 industrial building uses would not include cold storage space, there is a possibility that trucks and trailers visiting the Project site would be equipped with transport refrigeration units (TRU).4 5 TRUs on trucks and trailers can emit large quantities of diesel exhaust while operating within the Project site. Residences and other sensitive receptors (e.g., daycare facilities, senior care facilities, and schools) located near where these TRUs could be operating would be exposed to diesel exhaust emissions that would result in significant 3-g cancer risk. CARB staff urges the applicant and City to revise the ISIMND to clearly define the Project's description so the public can fully understand the potential environmental effects of the Project on their communities. 2 In fact,the California Supreme Court recently addressed this issue in its landmark ruling in Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2018)6 Cal.5th 502(Friant Ranch). In Friant Ranch,the Court held that an Environmental Impact Report(EIR)is inadequate if it does not make°a reasonable effort to discuss relevant specifics regarding the connection between two segments of information already contained in the EIR,the general health effects associated with a particular pollutant and the estimated amount of that pollutant the project will likely produce." (Id.,at p.521.) The current version of the ISIMND fails to do this and,as a result,is currently inadequate as a matter of law. 3 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment(OEHHA). Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. February.2015. Accessed at: https:lloehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/201 Sguidancemanual.pdf. 4 TRUs are refrigeration systems powered by integral diesel engines that protect perishable goods during transport in an insulated truck and trailer vans,rail cars,and domestic shipping containers. 5 Project descriptions"must include(a)the precise location and boundaries of the proposed project,(b)a statement of the objectives sought by the proposed project, (c)a general description of the project's technical,economic and environmental characteristics,and(d)a statement briefly describing the intended use of the EIR." (stopthemilleniumholWood.com v_ City of Los Angeles(2019)39 Ca[.App.5'^1, 16.) "This description of the project is an indispensable element of both a valid draft EIR and final EIR.- (ibid.) Without explicit acknowledgment in the project description that the proposed project will not include cold storage facilities,the current project description fails to meet the bare minimum of describing the project's technical and environmental characteristics. Damaris Abraham January 21, 2020 Page 4 If the Project will not be used for cold storage, CARB staff urges the City to include one of the following design measures in a revised ISIMND: • A Project design measure requiring contractual language in tenant lease 3-10 agreements that prohibits tenants from operating TRUs within the Project site; or • A condition requiring a restrictive covenant over the parcel that prohibits the applicant's use of TRUs on the property unless the applicant seeks and receives an amendment to its conditional use permit allowing such use. If the City does allow TRUs within the Project site, CARB staff urges the City to model air pollutant emissions from on-site TRUs in the revised ISIMND, as well as prepare a 3-11 health risk assessment (HRA) that shows the potential health risks. The revised ISIMND should also include the air pollutant reduction measures listed in Attachment A. IV. The ISIMND Did Not Model Mobile Air Pollutant Emissions Using CARB's 2017 Emission Factor Model (EMFAC2017) The Project's air quality impacts were modeled using mobile emission factors obtained from CARB's 2014 Emission Factors model (EMFAC2014). Project-related air pollutant emissions from mobile sources should be modeled using CARB's latest EMFAC2017.6 One of the many updates made to EMFAC included an update to the model's 3-12 heavy-duty emission rates and idling emission factors, which results in higher PM emissions as compared to EMFAC2014. Since EMFAC2017 generally shows higher emissions of particulate matter from trucks than EMFAC2014, the Project's mobile source NO. and diesel PM emissions are likely underestimated. CARB staff urges the applicant and City to model and report the Project's air pollution emissions from mobile sources using emission factors found in CARB's latest EMFAC2017. V. Conclusion Lead agencies may only adopt mitigated negative declarations if the "initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment" (14 CCR 3-13 section 15070(b)(2)). Based on the comments provided above, CARB staff is concerned that the City's current ISIMND does not meet this threshold. As it stands, the ISIMND does not meet the bare legal minimum of serving as an 3-14 adequate informational document relative to informing decision makers and the public 6 The Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)approved the use of EMFAC2017 for SIP and conformity purposes effective August 15,2019. Damaris Abraham January 21, 2020 Page 5 that there is no substantial evidence? in the record that the Project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment (see Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2018) 6 Cal.Sth 502, 520). Based on the items discussed above, CARS staff believes 3-14 that there would be substantial evidence in the record to find that the Project may have Cont. a significant effect on the environment. In this event, the applicant and City would be required to prepare a full EIR for the Project under the "fair argument" standard (See No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.3d 68, 83).8 CARB staff recommends that the applicant and City prepare an HRA evaluating the Project's potential operational health impacts, remodel mobile emissions using EMFAC2017 and clearly define whether the proposed industrial uses include cold storage, and recirculate the ISIMND for public review. Should the updated and recirculated ISIMND find, after adequately addressing the informational deficiencies noted in this letter, that there is substantial evidence in the record to support a fair 3-15 argument that the Project may have a significant effect on the environment, the applicant and City must prepare and circulate a draft EIR for public review, as required under CEQA. In addition to the concerns listed above, CARS staff encourages the applicant and City to implement the measures listed in Attachment A of this comment letter in order to reduce the Project's construction and operational air pollution emissions. "Substantial evidence"is defined,in part,as"enough relevant information and reasonable information that a fair argument can be made to support a conclusion,even though other conclusions might also be reached. Substantial evidence shall include facts, reasonable assumptions predicated upon facts,and expert opinion supported by facts." B The adequacy of an ISIMND is judicially reviewed under the"fair argument"standard should a party challenge the lead agencies CEQA determination. Under this standard,a negative declaration is invalid if there is substantial evidence in the record supporting a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect on the environment. (Gentry v. City of Murfieta(1995)36 Cal.App4h 1359, 1399.) This is the case"even though[the lead agency]may also be presented with other substantial evidence that the project will not have a significant effect." (CEQA Guidelines,Title 14 CCR section 15064(f)(1).) The California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)places the burden of environmental investigation on the public agency rather than on the public. If a lead agency does not fully evaluate a project's environmental consequences, it cannot support a decision to adopt a negative declaration by asserting that the record contains no substantial evidence of a significant adverse environmental impact. (Sundstrom v.County of Mendocino(1988)202 Cal.App.3d 296,311.) If a lead agency does not study a potential environmental impact,a reviewing court may find the existence of a fair argument of a significant impact based on limited facts in the record that might otherwise not be sufficient to support a fair argument of a significant impact. (Sundstrom v.County of Mendocino(1988)202 Cal.App.3d 296,311.) Damaris Abraham January 21, 2020 Page 6 CARB staff appreciates the opportunity to comment on the IS/MND for the Project and can provide assistance on zero-emission technologies and emission reduction 3-16 strategies, as needed. If you have questions, please contact Stanley Armstrong, Air Pollution Specialist, at (916) 440-8242 or via email at stanley.armstrong@arb.ca.gov. Sincerely, if��a J-/-'z t�o— Richard Boyd, Chief Risk Reduction Branch Transportation and Toxics Division Attachment CC.' See next page. Damaris Abraham January 21, 2020 Page 7 CC' State Clearinghouse P.O. Box 3044 Sacramento. California 95812 Morgan Capilla NEPA Reviewer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Air Division, Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94105 Carlo De La Cruz Sierra Club 714 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 1000 Los Angeles, California 90015 Lijin Sun CEQA - Intergovernmental Review South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, California 91765 Andrea Vidaurre Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice P.O. Box 33124 Riverside, California 92519 Stanley Armstrong Air Pollution Specialist Risk Analysis Section Transportation and Toxics Division ATTACHMENT A Recommended Air Pollution Emission Reduction Measures for Warehouses and Distribution Centers California Air Resources Board (CARB) staff recommends developers and government planners use all existing and emerging zero to near-zero emission technologies during project construction and operation to minimize public exposure to air pollution. Below are some measures, currently recommended by CARB staff, specific to warehouse and distribution center projects. These recommendations are subject to change as new zero-emission technologies become available. Recommended Construction Measures 1. Ensure the cleanest possible construction practices and equipment are used. This includes eliminating the idling of diesel-powered equipment and providing the necessary infrastructure (e.g., electrical hookups) to support zero and near-zero equipment and tools. 2. Implement, and plan accordingly for, the necessary infrastructure to support the zero and near-zero emission technology vehicles and equipment that will be operating on site. Necessary infrastructure may include the physical (e.g., needed footprint), energy, and fueling infrastructure for construction equipment, on-site vehicles and equipment, and medium-heavy and heavy-heavy duty trucks. 3. In construction contracts, include language that requires all off-road diesel-powered equipment used during construction to be equipped with Tier 4 or cleaner engines, except for specialized construction equipment in which Tier 4 engines are not available. In place of Tier 4 engines, off-road equipment can incorporate retrofits such that emission reductions achieved equal or exceed that of a Tier 4 engine. 4. In construction contracts, include language that requires all off-road equipment with a power rating below 19 kilowatts (e.g., plate compactors, pressure washers) used during project construction be battery powered. 5. In construction contracts, include language that requires all heavy-duty trucks entering the construction site, during the grading and building construction phases be model year 2014 or later. All heavy-duty haul trucks should also meet CARB's lowest optional low-N4x standard starting in the year 2022.1 ' In 2013,CARB adopted optional low-NO emission standards for on-road heavy-duty engines. CARB staff encourages engine manufacturers to introduce new technologies to reduce NO emissions below the current mandatory on-road heavy-duty diesel engine emission standards for model years 2010 and later. CARB's optional low-NO,emission standard is available at: https:/Amww.arb.r-a.govlmsprog/onroadloptionnox/optionnox.htm. Attachment - 1 6. In construction contracts, include language that requires all construction equipment and fleets to be in compliance with all current air quality regulations. CARB staff is available to assist in implementing this recommendation. Recommended Operation Measures 1. Include contractual language in tenant lease agreements that requires tenants to use the cleanest technologies available, and to provide the necessary infrastructure to support zero-emission vehicles and equipment that will be operating on site. 2. Include contractual language in tenant lease agreements that requires all loading/unloading docks and trailer spaces be equipped with electrical hookups for trucks with transport refrigeration units (TRU) or auxiliary power units. This requirement will substantially decrease the amount of time that a TRU powered by a fossil-fueled internal combustion engine can operate at the project site. Use of zero-emission all-electric plug-in TRUs, hydrogen fuel cell transport refrigeration, and cryogenic transport refrigeration are encouraged and can also be included in lease agreements.2 3. Include contractual language in tenant lease agreements that requires all TRUs entering the project site be plug-in capable. 4. Include contractual language in tenant lease agreements that requires future tenants to exclusively use zero-emission light and medium-duty delivery trucks and vans. 5. Include contractual language in tenant lease agreements requiring all TRUs, trucks, and cars entering the Project site be zero-emission. 6. Include contractual language in tenant lease agreements that requires all service equipment (e.g., yard hostlers, yard equipment, forklifts, and pallet jacks) used within the project site to be zero-emission. This equipment is widely available. 7. Include contractual language in tenant lease agreements that requires all heavy-duty trucks entering or on the project site to be model year 2014 or later, expedite a transition to zero-emission vehicles, and be fully zero-emission beginning in 2030. CARB's Technology Assessment for Transport Refrigerators provides information on the current and projected development of TRUs,including current and anticipated costs. The assessment is available at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/tech/techreporUtru-0729201 5.pdf. Attachment- 2 8. Include contractual language in tenant lease agreements that requires the tenant be in, and monitor compliance with, all current air quality regulations for on-road trucks including CARB's Heavy-Duty (Tractor-Trailer) Greenhouse Gas Regulation'3 Periodic Smoke Inspection Program (PSIP),4 and the Statewide Truck and Bus Regulation.$ 9. Include contractual language in tenant lease agreements restricting trucks and support equipment from idling longer than five minutes while on site. 10.Include contractual language in tenant lease agreements that limits on-site TRU diesel engine runtime to no longer than 15 minutes. If no cold storage operations are planned, include contractual language and permit conditions that prohibit cold storage operations unless a health risk assessment is conducted and the health impacts fully mitigated. 11.Include rooftop solar panels for each proposed warehouse to the extent feasible, with a capacity that matches the maximum allowed for distributed solar connections to the grid. 3 In December 2008,CARB adopted a regulation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by improving the fuel efficiency of heavy-duty tractors that pull 53-foot or longer box-type trailers. The regulation applies primarily to owners of 53-foot or longer box-type trailers,including both dry-van and refrigerated-van trailers,and owners of the heavy-duty tractors that pull them on Califomia highways. CARB's Heavy-Duty(Tractor-Trailer)Greenhouse Gas Regulation is available at: https:tlwww.arb,ca.gov/cdhdghglhdghg.htm. " The PSIP program requires that diesel and bus fleet owners conduct annual smoke opacity inspections of their vehicles and repair those with excessive smoke emissions to ensure compliance. CARB's PSIP program is available at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/enflhdvip/hdvip.htm. 5 The regulation requires newer heavier trucks and buses must meet particulate matter filter requirements beginning January 1,2012. Lighter and older heavier trucks replaced starting January 1,2015. By January 1,2023,nearly all trucks and buses will need to have 2010 model year engines or equivalent. CARB's Statewide Truck and Bus Regulation is available at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/onrdieseVonrdiesel.htm. Attachment - 3 City of Lake Elsinore Pennington Industrial Project Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND Responses to Comments on the IS/MN D Comments received during the circulation of the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared for the Pennington Industrial Project (Project) are attached. The Draft IS/MND was circulated for a 30-day public review period that began on December 23, 2019 and ended on January 22, 2020.The City of Lake Elsinore received three comment letters on the Draft IS/MND. The commenters and the page number on which each commenter's letter appear are listed below. Letter No. . Cornmenter Page No. 1 Lijin Sun,J.D.,Program Supervisor,South Coast Air Quality Management District 1 2 Board of Directors,Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance 4 3 Richard Boyd,Chief,Risk Reduction Branch,Transportation and Toxics Division,California Air 15 Resources Board The comment letters and responses follow.The comment letters have been numbered sequentially and each separate issue raised by the commenter, if more than one, has been assigned a number. The responses to each comment identify first the number of the comment letter, and then the number assigned to each issue (Response 1.1,for example, indicates that the response is for the first issue raised in comment Letter 1). The following reports and modeling output are provided as attachments: • Attachment 1. Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment, Urban Crossroads, March 13, 2020 • Attachment 2. Biological Resources Letter Report and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency for the Pennington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, California, Dudek, December 14, 2018 • Attachment 3. EMFAC2017 Air Quality Modeling, Urban Crossroads, March 10, 2020 City of Lake Elsinore Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND Pennington Industrial Project Letter 1 COMMENTER: Lijin Sun,J.D., Program Supervisor, Director, South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) DATE: January 7, 2020 Response 1-1 The commenter correctly describes the Project as the construction of three industrial buildings totaling 91,140 square feet for manufacturing/warehouse uses with eight dock doors on 5.01 acres. The Project is expected to be constructed within 12 months.The commenter states that the Project is anticipated to generate approximately 167 truck traffic trips per day and cites page 96 of the initial study for this information. Additionally, based upon SCAQMD staff review of aerial photographs and Figure 2, Project Site from the initial study,the commenter states that institutional uses, including a high school are located immediately west of the Project. The commenter is incorrect in summarizing that the Project is expected to generate 167 truck trips per day.The 167 truck trips per day that are referenced in the Traffic Study are in terms of passenger car equivalents (PCEs)which is a metric utilized for traffic analysis purposes.The Project, as summarized in the Project Air Quality Report would result in only approximately 70 daily truck trips. A mobile source Health Risk Assessment (HRA)was prepared by Urban Crossroads on March 13, 2020 (Attachment 1 of this response to comments document) in accordance with the Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risk from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis, which comprises all relevant procedures presented by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA), California Environmental Protection Agency(CalEPA), and SCAQMD.The sensitive receptors identified in the HRA include two existing residences,the Keith McCarthy Academy, Ortega High School and Lake Elsinore Head Start, and the California Online Academy.A summary of the sensitive receptors analyzed in the HRA is provided below in Table 1-1: Table 1-1: Sensitive Receptors Distance from Project Site ReceptorlD R1 916 Located approximately 916 feet north of the project site, R1 is an existing residential home located at 18570 Collier Avenue R2 640 Located approximately 640 feet east of the project site,R2 represents an existing residential home located at 18740 Collier Avenue R3 10 Located approximately 10 feet southeast of the project site, R3 is the existing Keith McCarthy Academy buildings R4 326 Located approximately 326 feet southeast of the project site,R4 is the existing Ortega High School/Lake Elsinore Head Start Kindergarten buildings R5 27 Located approximately 27 feet southeast of the project site,R5 is the existing California Online Academy buildings Source:Urban Crossroads,Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment,dated March 13,2020(Attachment 1) 1 City of Lake Elsinore Pennington Industrial Project Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND Cancer risk is expressed in terms of expected incremental incidence per million population. SCAQMD has established an incidence rate of 10 persons per million as the maximum acceptable incremental cancer risk due to diesel particulate matter(DPM) exposure.The results of the HRA indicate that the maximum risk estimate associated with the proposed Project is 0.53 in one million, which is substantially less than the applicable threshold of 10 in one million (refer to Attachment 1, of this response to comments document,Table ES-1).As such, no impacts to residential, school, or other sensitive receptors would occur as a result of the Project. Response 1-2 The commenter states that the proposed Project's construction and operational emissions were compared to SC AQMD's recommended regional and localized air quality CEQA significance thresholds. All air quality impacts from construction and operational activities were found to be less than significant and no air quality mitigation measures were proposed. The commenter is correct that the Air Quality Study prepared by Urban Crossroads, dated July 10, 2019, concluded that Project construction and operations emissions are below the daily maximum thresholds established by SCAQMD for criteria pollutants (VOC, NOx, CO, SOx, PM1o, and PM2.5) and the Project was found to be consistent with the local Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP).The results of the air quality analysis study were summarized in the initial study and provided as Appendix A to the document. No air quality mitigation measures are proposed since the results of the air quality modeling did not identify any potentially significant air quality impacts. Response 1-3 The commenter states that the Project involves the operation of warehouse uses near existing schools and that a mobile source health risk assessment was not conducted.The commenter provides an attachment to the letter with recommended mitigation measures that the commenter states should be incorporated in the Final IS/MND to further reduce the Projects long-term emissions from mobile sources. A mobile source HRA was prepared by Urban Crossroads on March 13, 2020 (Attachment 1 of this response to comments document).As shown in Table 1-1 above,the HRA identified three schools (Keith McCarthy Academy, Ortega High School and Lake Elsinore Head Start, and the California Online Academy) within 1,000 feet of the proposed Project as sensitive receptors.The results of the HRA indicate the Project would not result in significant health risk impacts (refer to Attachment 1, of this response to comments document,Table ES-1).The maximum risk estimate of 0.53 in one million is substantially less than the applicable threshold of 10 in one million. As such, no impacts to residential or other sensitive receptors would occur as a result of the Project. Additionally,the results of the Project Air Quality Study, indicated that emissions generated during construction and operation of the Project will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds.Therefore,there are no significant impacts to air quality that would require mitigation. Response 1-4 The commenter states that California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15074 requires the Lead Agency to consider the MIND for adoption together with comments received during the public review process prior to approving the Project.The commenter requests written responses to all comments contained in their letter prior to adoption of the Final IS/MND. Finally, City of Lake Elsinore Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND Pennington Industrial Project SCAQMD requests sufficient details providing reasons why specific comments and suggestions are not accepted. The City appreciates the time taken by SCAQMD to review and comment on the Project.At the request of SCAQMD, a mobile source HRA was prepared for the proposed Project (See Attachment 1 of this response to comments document) in March 2020.The sensitive receptors identified by SCAQMD (adjacent schools)were included into this analysis.As described in Response to Comments 1-1 and 1-3, above,the results of the HRA indicate the Project would not result in significant health risk impacts.The maximum risk estimate of 0.53 in one million modeled for the proposed Project is substantially less than the applicable threshold of 10 in one million. Additionally,the results of the Project Air Quality Analysis, indicated that emissions generated during construction and operation of the Project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds.Therefore,there are no significant impacts to air quality associated with the proposed Project that would require the City to apply the mitigation measures recommended by SCAQMD. 3 City of Lake Elsinore Pennington Industrial Project Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND Letter 2 COMMENTER: Board of Directors, Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance (GSEJA) DATE: January 17, 2020 Response 2-1 The commenter thanks the City for the opportunity to comment on the IS/MND for the Project on behalf of Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance (GSEJA).The commenter requests that GSEJA be added to the public interest list to receive subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this Project. The City appreciates the time taken by GSEJA to review and comment on the proposed Project.The GSEJA will be added to the City's list of interested parties and will receive written notices and documents related to the proposed Project by mail at the address provided. Response 2-2 The commenter correctly describes the Project as the construction of three industrial buildings totaling 91,140 square feet with 167 parking space on a 5.01-acre vacant lot.The Project is expected to be constructed within 12 months. Each building would consist of a planned open warehouse with truck access doors and a planned office area with mezzanine level.The Project would have a 0.44 floor area ratio (FAR) and 41 percent lot coverage.The maximum height of the buildings would be 30 feet.The commenter also correctly describes the discretionary actions required to implement the Project, which include: (1)Tentative Parcel Map (TPM No. 37710)to subdivide the 5.01 gross acre site into three parcels that are 1.06 acres, 1.72 acres, and 2.01 acres; and (2) Industrial Design Review (IDR No. 2019-01)to construct three industrial buildings that are 91,140 square feet total. The City concurs with the commenter's description of the proposed project. Response 2-3 The commenter states that the analysis in the document is inconsistent because the Project description describes the proposed use as "planned open warehouse,"the Air Quality Study and Traffic Study model all three buildings as manufacturing only,the greenhouse gas analysis describes it as a warehouse use that would serve midstream functions in the goods movement chain between manufacturers and consumers, and the land use and planning analysis describes the use as warehouse and manufacturing. The commenter states that a Project EIR must be prepared which provides a consistent environmental analysis. The Project description and analysis in the IS/MND is correct.The proposed Project is for the construction and operation of a planned open warehouse and the property is designated in the City General Plan for Limited Industrial (L-1) and zoned by the City for Limited Manufacturing(M-1). Because the occupant of the buildings is not yet known, the Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Traffic studies use the manufacturing designation since the emissions factors and traffic generation are typically higher in the models used than the industrial designation.The City believes that the IS/MND is the appropriate document for this Project under CEQA since all potential significant impacts (biological resources, cultural resources, geology/soils,traffic and noise) can be reduced to a level of less than significant with mitigation. City of Lake Elsinore Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND Pennington Industrial Project Response 2-4 The commenter states that the analysis describes the Project as a manufacturing use only, which differs from the Project description which describes the use as an open warehouse. The land use and planning analysis describes the use as both warehouse and manufacturing and the greenhouse gas analysis models the buildings for warehouse use only.The commenter states that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) must be prepared which consistently models the proposed Project as the same type of use. As described above, under Response to Comment 2-3,The Project is proposed as the construction and operation of a planned open warehouse. However, the property is designated in the City General Plan for Limited Industrial (L-1) and zoned by the City for Limited Manufacturing(M-1). Because the occupant of the buildings is not yet known, the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Studies use the manufacturing designation since the emissions factors and are typically higher in the air quality models than the industrial designation.This ensures that a building occupant who chooses to conduct some minor manufacturing activities in the buildings may do so, in compliance with the property zoning.The City disagrees that an EIR is necessary and an IS/MND is the appropriate document for this Project under CEQA since all potential significant impacts (biological resources, cultural resources,geology/soils,traffic and noise) can be reduced to a level of less than significant with mitigation. Response 2-5 The commenter states that Section 17.176.080 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code permits construction activity between the hours of 7:00 am and 7:00 pm, Monday through Saturday.The commenter states that the IS/MND does not provide a worst-case scenario analysis of construction equipment emitting pollutants for the legal 12 hours per day, 6 days per week.The commenter states that an EIR must be prepared with revised air quality modeling to account for legally possible longer construction days. While the commenter is correct that construction activities are permitted to occur within the City of Lake Elsinore (up to 12 hours per day) pursuant to City's municipal code,the identified construction equipment would not be used during every hour of the day. Rather,the air quality report, consistent with industry standards and typical construction practices, assumes that each piece of equipment listed in air quality report would operate up to eight total hours per day, or approximately 2/3 of the period during which construction activities are allowed pursuant to the municipal code. For example, during grading operations,water trucks would not operate continuously over a 12-hour period but would instead be used as necessary to minimize fugitive dust. In fact, most pieces of equipment likely would operate for fewer hours per day than indicated in Air Quality Study.With respect to construction on the weekends, SCAQMD thresholds of significance are based on daily emissions;thus, air quality effects during weekends would be the same as during the normal work week. Accordingly,the City finds that the assumptions used in the Project's air quality report properly disclose a reasonable, and likely overstated evaluation of the Project's potential impacts due to air quality emissions modeling assumptions.The City believes that the IS/MND is the appropriate document for this Project under CEQA since all potential significant impacts (biological resources, cultural resources,geology/soils,traffic and noise) can be reduced to a level of less than significant with mitigation. 5 City of Lake Elsinore Pennington Industrial Project Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND Response 2-6 The commenter states that the California Emissions Estimator Model (CALEEMod) output sheets indicate that a vendor trip length is 6.90 miles for all phases of construction. The commenter states that the IS/MND does not provide information regarding where the construction materials are coming from or if they are all coming from the same location during all phases. Additionally,the commenter states that the CalEEMod output sheets rely on trip generation from the Traffic Study, which presents trip generation in passenger car equivalents (PCE).The commenter states that the Air Quality Study must be revised to include the actual quantity of truck trips and model them as truck trips instead of PCE.The commenter states that offsite improvements (streets, streetlights, striping, and connection to sewer, water and utilities)should be added for analysis.The commenter also states that at least 50 percent of the proposed warehouse space must be modeled as refrigerated/cold storage since the M-1 Limited Manufacturing Zone permits cold storage. Finally, the commenter states that an EIR must be prepared for the Project which includes a revised air quality analysis. The City believes that it would be unreasonable for the Air Quality Study to provide detailed information on material supply since it is unknown at this time.The Air Quality Study relies on CalEEMod to quantify emissions from vendor related trips during construction. CalEEMod assumes, as an air quality model default,that since the majority of materials are anticipated to come from local vendors, a trip distance of 6.9 miles is adequate based on surveyed data by various air districts. Similarly,the use of PCEs in CalEEMod is a standard and accepted practice to model truck traffic emissions.As such, use of the CalEEMod defaults is appropriate and supported by substantial evidence.The commenter does not provide any substantive information as to why this trip distance is not correct. As previously noted,the Project has been evaluated as a manufacturing use which likely overstates potential impacts to air quality since the emissions factors are higher than those modeled to industrial. Future tenants are unknown at this time and no refrigerated/cold storage is proposed at this time. Mitigation Measure Trans-1 requires that the applicant pay a Project fair share to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Collier Avenue at Chaney Street and a separate northbound left turn lane from Collier Avenue to Chaney Street.These improvements would be constructed by the City and subject to separate City reviews and CEQA analysis.There are no other offsite improvements needed since utility connections are available at the Project site. The City believes that the IS/MND is the appropriate document for this Project under CEQA since all potential significant impacts (biological resources, cultural resources,geology/soils,traffic and noise) can be reduced to a level of less than significant with mitigation. Response 2-7 The commenter states that Project grading is expected to balance onsite with no required import or export of soils, however,the IS/MND states "there is an onsite man-made detention basin on the northeast corner of the site which will be removed during construction and replaced with onsite catch basins" resulting in paving over the existing detention basin to create a portion of the parking lot.The commenter states that Figure 5, Conceptual Grading Plan, does not provide any meaningful information regarding the detention basin and the amount of fill required to accommodate the parking stalls.The commenter requests preparation of an EIR which includes this information and City of Lake Elsinore Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND Pennington Industrial Project models the required number of hauling trips during grading to accommodate the necessary soil import/export. As depicted in Figure 5, Conceptual Grading Plan,the site would balance, meaning that after grading the existing earthen detention basin and filling it with soil that originates onsite,there would be no excess of soil that would be trucked off. Similarly,there is no need to bring fill dirt from another location for the detention basin since plenty of soil exists onsite.There would be no hauling trips necessary for this Project.The City believes that the IS/MND is the appropriate document for this Project under CEQA since all potential significant impacts (biological resources, cultural resources, geology/soils,traffic and noise) can be reduced to a level of less than significant with mitigation. Response 2-8 The commenter states that the LST analysis arbitrarily uses a 279-meter receptor distance for PM10 and PM2.5 impacts because this is the distance of the nearest residential receptor.The nearest receptor is an industrial building 18 meters north of the Project site and a 25-meter receptor distance was utilized for NOx and CO analysis consistent with SCAQMD methodology. The commenter states that a project EIR must be prepared which also utilizes a 25-meter receptor distance for PM10 and PM2.5 The commenter states they are concerned about the receptor distance used in the Project Air Quality Study PM10 and PM2.5 analysis.The primary focus of the Air Quality Study is the effects that prolonged exposure to emissions from the Project have on the surrounding sensitive receptors. As discussed in the Air Quality Study(page 46), and per the Localized Significance Threshold (LST) Methodology, commercial and industrial facilities are not included in the definition of sensitive receptor because employees do not typically remain onsite for a full 24 hours but are typically onsite for eight hours. However, it should be noted that the LST Methodology explicitly states that "LSTs based on shorter averaging periods, such as the NOx and CO LSTs, could also be applied to receptors such as industrial or commercial facilities since it is reasonable to assume that a worker at these sites could be present for periods of one to eight hours."Therefore,the findings of the IS/MND are correct and no revision is required. Response 2-9 The commenter states that an EIR must be prepared to include a HRA to analyze construction related and operational stationary and mobile sources of toxic air contaminants.The commenter states that at a minimum,the HRA must analyze for cancer, non-cancer(such as respiratory impairment), acute/short-term and chronic/long-term impacts to the nearest sensitive receptors at McCarthy Academy/Ortega High School and offices to the east and west. A mobile source HRA was prepared by Urban Crossroads on March 13, 2020 (Attachment 1 of this response to comments document)for the Project in accordance with the Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risk from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis, which comprises all relevant procedures presented by the USEPA, CalEPA, and SCAQMD. The sensitive receptors identified in the HRA include two existing residences, the Keith McCarthy Academy, Ortega High School and Lake Elsinore Head Start, and the California Online Academy.A summary of the sensitive receptors analyzed in the HRA is provided below in Table 2-1: 7 City of Lake Elsinore Pennington Industrial Project Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND Table 2-1: Sensitive Receptors ProjectDistance from ReceptorlD (feet) Land Use Description R1 916 Located approximately 916 feet north of the project site,R1 is an existing residential home located at 18570 Collier Avenue R2 640 Located approximately 640 feet east of the project site, R2 represents an existing residential home located at 18740 Collier Avenue R3 10 Located approximately 10 feet southeast of the project site,R3 is the existing Keith McCarthy Academy buildings R4 326 Located approximately 326 feet southeast of the project site,R4 is the existing Ortega High School/Lake Elsinore Head Start Kindergarten buildings R5 27 Located approximately 27 feet southeast of the project site, R5 is the existing California Online Academy buildings Source:Urban Crossroads,Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment,dated March 13,2020(Attachment 1) Cancer risk is expressed in terms of expected incremental incidence per million population. SCAQMD has established an incidence rate of 10 persons per million as the maximum acceptable incremental cancer risk due to DPM exposure. The results of the HRA indicate that the maximum risk estimate associated with the proposed Project is 0.53 in one million, which is substantially less than the applicable threshold of 10 in one million (refer to Attachment 1 of this response to comments document,Table ES-1). In addition,the Air Quality Study prepared by Urban Crossroads, dated July 10, 2019, concluded that Project construction and operations emissions are below the daily maximum thresholds established by SCAQMD for criteria pollutants (VOC, NOx, CO,SOx, PMlo, and PM2.5) and the Project was found to be consistent with the local AQMP.The Project would not result in significant air quality impacts or create a significant health risk for surrounding sensitive receptors, therefore,the City believes that the IS/MND is the appropriate document for this Project under CEQA. Response 2-10 The commenter states that the IS/MND does not include environmental justice issues in reviewing potential impacts, including cumulative impacts from the proposed Project.The commenter states that CalEnviroScreen 3.0, CALEPA's screening tool that ranks each census tract for pollution and socioeconomic vulnerability ranked the proposed Project's census tract worse than 85 percent of the rest of the state overall.The commenter states that the surrounding community, including sensitive receptors,such as Ortega High School adjacent to the west, has higher pollution rates on every indicator measured by CalEnviroScreen. The City is aware of the commenter's description of the CalEnviroScreen and understands the designations that would be applied to the census tract that the Project occurs in. Although the National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA) does require review of environmental justice issues, CEQA does not, which is why that issue was not discussed in the IS/MND. Regardless, Project construction and operations emissions are below the daily maximum thresholds established by SCAQMD for criteria pollutants(VOC, NOx, CO, SOx, PM1o, and PM2.5), a mobile emissions HRA was prepared for City of Lake Elsinore Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND Pennington Industrial Project the Project on March 13, 2020 to further analyze the potential for impacts to sensitive receptors in the Project area (residences and schools, including Ortega High School).The results of the HRA indicate that the maximum risk estimate associated with the proposed Project is 0.53 in one million, which is substantially less than the applicable threshold of 10 in one million (refer to Attachment 1 of this response to comments document,Table ES-1).Therefore, construction and operation of the Project is not expected to adversely impact the public in the surrounding area. Response 2-11 The commenter states that the Project's census tract is a diverse community including 63 percent Hispanic residents which are especially vulnerable to the impacts of pollution.The commenter states there is a high rate of linguistic isolation, meaning 72 percent of households speak little to no English. Further,the community has a high rate of low education attainment with 88 percent of the tract over age 25 not holding a high school diploma, which is an indication that they may not have access to health care.The commenter states that there is a higher proportion of lower birth rates and asthma in children in the community. The City understands the commenter's concerns regarding the health of the community.As stated above under Response to Comment 2-10,the Project construction and operations emissions would be below the daily maximum thresholds established by SCAQMD for criteria pollutants (VOC, NOx, CO, SOx, PMlo, and PM2.5),the results of the HRA indicate that the maximum risk estimate associated with the proposed Project is 0.53 in one million, which is substantially less than the applicable threshold of 10 in one million (refer to Attachment 1 of this response to comments document,Table ES-1).Therefore, construction and operation of the Project is not expected to adversely impact the local community. Response 2-12 The commenter states that the Project is located within a Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) survey area for burrowing owl. which requires that a biological survey be completed in a Project EIR.The commenter notes that the IS/MND includes Mitigation Measure BIO-1 which requires that preconstruction species surveys for burrowing owl be conducted within 30-days prior to any ground-disturbing activities at the Project site where suitable habitat is present.The commenter states that the site's location within a MSCHP burrowing owl survey area requires the completion of a biological survey in an EIR. Mitigation Measure-BIO-1 would not include public review of the burrowing owl survey,which the commenter states would be implementation of the Project without CEQA review.The commenter requests preparation of an EIR which includes a burrowing owl study. The City concurs with the commenter that the Project site is located within a Riverside County MSHCP Burrowing Owl Habitat Assessment Area,which requires a habitat assessment for burrowing owl.A biological resources survey, including burrowing owl habitat assessment,was conducted by Dudek on November 14, 2018 (Attachment 2 of this response to comments document).The results of the habitat assessment indicate that the potential for burrowing owl onsite is considered low due to site disturbance,the presence of loose sandy soils not capable of supporting burrows and regular tilling.Additionally,the Project site is surrounded by existing development without continuity with other open space, which decreases its potential as habitat. In the site's current condition, a Phase II burrow survey is not required.All impacts would be reduced to less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1,which will ensure that there is no disturbance of 9 City of Lake Elsinore Pennington Industrial Project Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND active burrowing owl nests in the unlikely event that the site is occupied by burrowing owl prior to construction.The City does not concur that an EIR is required. Response 2-13 The commenter states that the IS/MND concludes that implementation of Project Design Features 1 to 6 would ensure consistency with the applicable measures in the Lake Elsinore Climate Action Plan, resulting in less than significant impacts to renewable energy or energy efficiency. However, the commenter states that the IS/MND does not include a list of Project design features.The commenter states that the IS/MND is inadequate as an informational document and an EIR must be prepared. A reference for the City of Lake Elsinore Climate Action Plan (which contains Project Design Features 1 to 6)was provided in the IS/MND and a copy of all referenced documents is available at the City for review by the public.There are no potential Project impacts to renewable energy or energy efficiency that require implementation of the Project design features as mitigation. Rather,these features are incorporated into the Project as required to ensure consistency with the Climate Action Plan.The City believes that the IS/MND is the appropriate document for this Project under CEQA since all potential significant impacts (biological resources, cultural resources, geology/soils,traffic and noise) can be reduced to a level of less than significant with mitigation. Response 2-14 The commenter states that the analysis in the document is inconsistent because the Project description describes the proposed use as "a warehouse use that will serve midstream functions in the goods movement chain between manufacturers and consumers."The commenter states that this differs from the Project description which describes the use as an open warehouse,the air quality analysis and transportation analysis which model all three buildings as manufacturing use only, and the land use and planning analysis which describes the use as both warehouse and manufacturing.The commenter states that an EIR must be prepared which provides a consistent environmental analysis. As described above in Response to Comments 2-3 and 2-4,the Project description and analysis in the IS/MND and all technical studies is correct.The proposed Project is for the construction and operation of a planned open warehouse,which could be further described as "a warehouse use that will serve midstream functions in the goods movement chain between manufacturers and consumers."The property is designated in the City General Plan for Limited Industrial (L-1) and zoned by the City for Limited Manufacturing (M-1). Because the occupant of the buildings is not yet known,the air quality, greenhouse gas emissions and traffic technical studies use the manufacturing designation since the emissions factors and traffic generation are typically higher in the models used than the industrial designation.The City believes that the IS/MND is the appropriate document for this Project under CEQA since all potential significant impacts (biological resources, cultural resources, geology/soils,traffic and noise) can be reduced to a level of less than significant with mitigation. Response 2-15 The commenter states that the IS/MND claims the Project's traffic generation is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)Trip Generation Manual for warehouse and industrial City of Lake Elsinore Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND Pennington Industrial Project land use categories.The commenter claims this is erroneous since the Traffic Study used ITE Code 140-Manufacturing for analysis. The commenter is correct that the Traffic Study generation rates were based upon ITE Code 140- Manufacturing.The ITE Trip Generation Manual includes both ITE Code 140-Ma n ufactu ring and ITE Code 150-Industrial under the warehouse and industrial land use categories. ITE Code 140- Manufacturing rates were chosen because it yields peak hour trip generation estimates which are at least 3.5 times greater than warehousing(see Table 2-2, below) and therefore, is considered the more conservative rate. Response 2-16 The commenter states that the IS/MND concludes that implementation of Project Design Features 1 to 6 would ensure consistency with the applicable measures in the Lake Elsinore Climate Action Plan, resulting in less than significant impacts to renewable energy or energy efficiency. However, the commenter states that the IS/MND does not include a list of Project design features.The commenter states that the IS/MND is inadequate as an informational document and an EIR must be prepared. As stated in Response to Comment 2-13, above, a reference for the City of Lake Elsinore Climate Action Plan (which contacts Project Design Features 1 to 6) was provided in the IS/MND and a copy of all referenced documents is available at the City for review by the public.There are no potential Project impacts to renewable energy or energy efficiency that require implementation of the Project design features as mitigation. Rather,these features are incorporated into the Project as required to ensure consistency with the Climate Action Plan.The City believes that the IS/MND is the appropriate document for this Project under CEQA since all potential significant impacts (biological resources, cultural resources, geology/soils,traffic and noise) can be reduced to a level of less than significant with mitigation. Response 2-17 The commenter states that the IS/MND describes the Project analysis as both warehouse and manufacturing.This differs from the Project description which describes the use as an open warehouse.The commenter states that the land use and planning analysis describes the use as both warehouse and manufacturing and the greenhouse gas analysis models the buildings for warehouse use only.The commenter states that an EIR must be prepared which consistently models the proposed Project as the same type of use. As described above, under Response to Comments 2-3 and 2-4, above,the Project is proposed as the construction and operation of a planned open warehouse. However,the property is designated in the City General Plan for Limited Industrial (L-1) and zoned by the City for Limited Manufacturing (M-1).The discussion regarding land use in the IS/MND addresses Project consistency with both of these land use designations. Because the occupant of the buildings is not yet known,the air quality and greenhouse gas emissions technical studies use the manufacturing designation since the emissions factors and are typically higher in the air quality models than the industrial designation. Response 2-18 The commenter states that Exhibit 7-A: Operational Noise Source and Receiver Locations in the Noise Study analyzes the impacts of the distribution/warehouse activity(truck loading dock doors) 11 City of Lake Elsinore Pennington Industrial Project Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND to a sensitive receiver modeled at a distance from 169 feet from the activity, which is much further than the closest point of the Ortega High School property line.The commenter states that the noise analysis must be revised as part of an EIR to analyze the impacts associated with the distribution/warehouse activity to the closest point of the Ortega High School property line. The nearest sensitive receptor to the Project site is the Keith McCarthy Academy and school use (identified as R2 and R3 in the Noise Study Report),which are described in the report as being located approximately 30 feet away from the Project. Due to the configuration of the proposed development,the noise analysis describes the truck loading docks as being located 169 feet from these sensitive receptors. Therefore,the methods used in the Noise Report to measure the distance between sensitive receptors and potential noise generating uses are correct. Response 2-19 The commenter lists the requirements of Mitigation Measure NOI 1: Construction Buffer, which requires prior to the issuance of grading permits,that the property owner include a note on the grading and building plans that no large mobile equipment, loaded trucks, and jackhammers shall be operated within 90 feet of the southwest property line. The commenter states that Mitigation Measure NOI-1 is not enforceable since there is no enforcement entity,field verification, or lead agency oversight to follow up on the note written on the Project plans. The note containing the Mitigation Measure NOI-1 requirements will be placed on all building plans with oversight of construction and approval of parking plans provided by the City.The measure is enforceable by the City both during construction and operation of the Project.The adjacent property owner will be notified that this measure is in place since all property owners within 300 feet of the Project site are notified of City actions on this Project, as required under CEQA. Response 2-20 The commenter states that the IS/MND does not provide analysis or supporting evidence to conclude that the Project would have no significant impacts to population and housing.The commenter states that the IS/MND concludes that the Project"would provide employment opportunities for City residents"without citing the City's unemployment rate/available workforce, number of residents with the appropriate skillset, or the number of jobs created by the Project.The commenter states that based upon the Lake Elsinore General Plan employment generation,the proposed Project would generate 152 employees.The commenter also states that an EIR must be prepared which includes evidence to substantiate the clam that there would be no significant impacts. The occupant of the building is not yet known,therefore, it is not reasonable to assume what the skillset required would be. The Traffic Study trip projections included approximately 90 passenger car trips per day,the majority of which would be trips taken to and from work by employees of the Project. Smaller warehouse/manufacturing buildings do provide employment opportunities that are expected to benefit local residents. However,these types of facilities are not considered a source of significant population increase since the types and number of jobs available (approximately 90 to 150 employees total) are not considered a major draw that would attract a significant number of new residents or require the provision of new housing.There would be no significant impacts to population and housing by the proposed Project. City of Lake Elsinore Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND Pennington Industrial Project Response 2-21 The commenter states that the IS/MND describes the Project analysis as a manufacturing use.This differs from the Project description which describes the use as an open warehouse. The commenter states that the land use and planning analysis describes the use as both warehouse and manufacturing and the greenhouse gas analysis models the buildings for warehouse use only.The commenter states that an EIR must be prepared which consistently models the proposed Project as the same type of use. As described above, under Response to Comments 2-3 and 2-4,the Project is proposed as the construction and operation of a planned open warehouse. However,the property is designated in the City General Plan for Limited Industrial (L-1) and zoned by the City for Limited Manufacturing (M-1). Because the occupant of the buildings is not yet known,the air quality and greenhouse gas emissions technical studies use the manufacturing designation since the emissions factors and are typically higher in the air quality models than the industrial designation.The focused traffic evaluation prepared for the Project is based on a conservative assumption of manufacturing use, which yields a relatively high trip generation for analysis purposes in comparison to warehousing, high-cube warehousing, and industrial park use. As shown below in Table 2-2,this analysis assumption of manufacturing use for the entire Project yields peak hour and daily trip generation estimates which are at greater than warehousing, high-cube warehousing, and industrial park uses. Table 2-2. Trip Generation Rates' ITE LU AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Code Units Daily Manufacturing 140 TSF 0.48 0.14 0.62 0.21 0.46 0.67 3.93 Warehousing 150 TSF 0.13 0.04 0.17 0.05 0.14 0.19 1.74 High-Cube 154 TSF 0.062 0.018 0.08 0.028 0.072 0.10 1.40 Warehousing Industrial Park 130 TSF 0.324 0.076 0.40 0.084 0.316 0.40 3.37 'Trip Generation Source:Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE),Trip Generation Manual,10th Edition(2017) Z TSF=Thousand Square Feet Source:Pennington Industrial Project Focused Traffic Evaluation,Urban Crossroads,July 29,2019 The City believes that the IS/MND is the appropriate document for this Project under CEQA since all potential significant impacts (biological resources, cultural resources,geology/soils,traffic and noise) can be reduced to a level of less than significant with mitigation. Response 2-22 The commenter states that the Traffic Study did not include freeway analysis and an EIR must be prepared to include analysis of the following facilities provided direct access to the Project site.The commenter provides the following freeway ramps and freeway merge/diverge locations as examples: Freeway Ramp ■ Interstate-15 (1-15)at Main Street ■ 1-15 at Central Avenue 13 City of Lake Elsinore Pennington Industrial Project Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND Freeway Merge/Diverge ■ 1-15 at State Route-74(SR-74) ■ 1-15 at State Route-91 (SR-91) ■ SR-74 at Interste-215 (1-215) The commenter states that this analysis is vital since the 1-215 and 1-15 provide direct access to the Project site from the Southern California Logistics Airport and SR-91 provides direct access to the site from the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles. The City of Lake Elsinore follows the County of Riverside's Traffic Study guidelines as outlined in their Riverside County Transportation Department Traffic Impact Analysis Preparation Guide (April 2008). Per the Traffic Study guidelines, any intersection of"Collector" or higher classification street at which the proposed Project would add 50 or more peak hour trips is to be evaluated. Based on the identified Project traffic generation and trip distribution patterns, Project weekday AM and PM peak hour volumes are shown on Exhibit 2 of the Traffic Evaluation Report, prepared by Urban Crossroads (dated July 29, 2019),which was included as Appendix H of the IS/MND. Exhibit 3 of the traffic report illustrates the traffic distribution pattern associated with the Project. Even with conservatively high trip generation assumptions for the Project, less than 50 Project peak hour trips would travel outside of the focused traffic evaluation study area. The freeway ramp intersections and merge/diverge locations identified in the above comment are not measurably impacted by peak hour Project traffic based upon City and County traffic analysis criteria. Therefore, analysis of the ramps and merge/diverge locations is not warranted. Response 2-23 The commenter states that for the foregoing reasons, GSEJA believes the IS/MND is flawed and an EIR must be prepared and circulated for review.The commenter requests that GSEJA be added to the public interest list to receive subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this Project. The City appreciates the time taken by GSEJA to review and comment on the proposed Project.The City believes that the IS/MND is the appropriate document for this Project under CEQA since all potential significant impacts (biological resources, cultural resources,geology/soils,traffic and noise) can be reduced to a level of less than significant with mitigation.The GSEJA will be added to the City's list of interested parties and receive written notices and documents related to the proposed Project by mail at the address provided. City of Lake Elsinore Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND Pennington Industrial Project Letter 3 COMMENTER: Richard Boyd, Chief, Risk Reduction Branch,Transportation and Toxics Division, California Air Resources Board (CARE) DATE: January 21, 2020 Response 3-1 The commenter thanks the City for providing the opportunity to review and comment on the IS/MND for the proposed Project.The commenter correctly describes the Project as the construction of three industrial buildings totaling 91,140 square feet.The commenter states that the Project is anticipated to generate approximately a total of 358 total vehicle trips daily, with 288 daily passenger trips and 70 truck trips.The commenter correctly states that the Project is located within the City of Lake Elsinore, and the City will act as the lead agency under CEQA. Response 3-2 The commenter states that freight facilities, such as warehouse and distribution facilities, can result in high daily volumes of heavy-duty diesel truck traffic and operation of onsite equipment that emit diesel emissions and contribute to regional air pollution and global climate change.The commenter states that the CARB staff have reviewed the IS/MND and is concerned about the air pollution impacts that would result should the City approve the Project. The City understands CARB's concerns and appreciates the time taken to review and comment on the proposed Project. Specific responses to CARB's comments are provided below. Response 3-3 The commenter states that the Project would expose nearby disadvantaged communities to elevated air pollution.The commenter states that residences are located immediate east of the Project with the closest residences located approximately 640 feet from the Project's northeastern boundary. In addition,the commenter notes that Ortega High School and Lake Elsinore Head Start Kindergarten are both located approximately 330 feet from the Project's southwest boundary. Additionally, Southern California Online Academy(a charter high school) is located immediately adjacent to the Project site.The commenter notes that the community is located within an area that currently supports existing industrial uses and traffic along Interstate 15 (1-15). Due to the Project's proximity to residences and schools, CARB staff is concerned with the potential cumulative health impacts associated with construction and operation of the Project. The City acknowledges CARB's concerns and concurs with the description of the local land uses. 1-15 is located northeasterly of the Project site and the area is designated for industrial warehouse uses, many of which have already been constructed. A mobile source HRA was prepared by Urban Crossroads on March 13, 2020 (Attachment 1 of this response to comments document)for the Project in accordance with the Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risk from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis,which comprises all relevant procedures presented by USEPA, CalEPA, and SCAQMD.The sensitive receptors identified in the HRA include two existing residences,the Keith McCarthy Academy, Ortega High School and Lake Elsinore Head Start, and the California Online Academy.A summary of the sensitive receptors analyzed in the HRA is provided below in Table 2-3: 15 City of Lake Elsinore Pennington Industrial Project Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND Table 2-3: Sensitive Receptors ProjectDistance from ReceptorlD (feet) Land Use Description R1 916 Located approximately 916 feet north of the Project site, R1 is an existing residential home located at 18570 Collier Avenue R2 640 Located approximately 640 feet east of the Project site,R2 represents an existing residential home located at 18740 Collier Avenue R3 10 Located approximately 10 feet southeast of the Project site, R3 is the existing Keith McCarthy Academy buildings R4 326 Located approximately 326 feet southeast of the Project site,R4 is the existing Ortega High School/Lake Elsinore Head Start Kindergarten buildings R5 27 Located approximately 27 feet southeast of the Project site, R5 is the existing California Online Academy buildings Source:Urban Crossroads,Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment,dated March 13,2020(Attachment 1) Cancer risk is expressed in terms of expected incremental incidence per million population.The SCAQMD has established an incidence rate of 10 persons per million as the maximum acceptable incremental cancer risk due to DPM exposure. The results of the HRA indicate that the maximum risk estimate associated with the proposed Project is 0.53 in one million, which is substantially less than the applicable threshold of 10 in one million (refer to Attachment 1 of this response to comments document,Table ES-1). In addition,the Air Quality Study prepared by Urban Crossroads, dated July 10, 2019, concluded that Project construction and operations emissions are below the daily maximum thresholds established by SCAQMD for criteria pollutants (VOC, NOx, CO,SOx, PMlo, and PM2.5) and the Project was found to be consistent with the local AQMP. As concluded in the IS/MND, which is based on substantial evidence contained in the Air Quality Study in Appendix A to the Draft IS/MND and the citations given therein,the Project's impacts to human health resulting from air pollutant emissions would be less than significant on a direct and cumulatively considerable basis. Additionally,the Air Quality Study (Subsection 2.9 Regional Air Quality Improvement), also documents the substantial improvement in air quality that has occurred across the South Coast Air Basin over the past several decades, and the improvement trend that is projected to continue as a result of increasingly stringent federal and State regulations that have been put in place to reduce air pollution concurrently with population and business growth. Response 3-4 The commenter states that the State of California has placed additional emphasis on protecting local communities from the effects of air pollution through the passage of Assembly Bill (AB) 617, which highlights the need for further emission reductions in communities with high exposure burdens like those in which the Project is located.The commenter states that diesel emissions generated during the construction and operation of the Project would negatively impact the community,which is already impacted by air pollution from existing industrial uses and 1-15. The City understands that SCAQMD is conducting air monitoring under AB 617 in several locations, from which more data will be available about the sources of air pollution,types of pollutants, and air quality impacts.The nearest AB 617 community undergoing air quality monitoring by SCAQMD is City of Lake Elsinore Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND Pennington Industrial Project located approximately 40 miles northeast of the Project site in the City of San Bernardino.' Monitoring data results have not yet been published.The Project area is designated for industrial use and has been sited adjacent to 1-15 to reduce the length of truck trips to reach the nearest freeway. Based upon the results of the mobile source HRA(Attachment 1 of this response to comments document) and the Project air quality report, construction and operation of the proposed Project would not exceed emissions thresholds and not result in a significant impact to sensitive receptors (residences and schools) in the Project area. Response 3-5 The commenter states that CalEPA is charged with the duty to identify disadvantaged communities under Health and Safety Code Section 39711. In this capacity, CalEPA currently defines a disadvantaged community as one that scores within the top 25 percent of the census tracts as analyzed by the California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool.The census tract containing the Project site is within the top 15 percent for Pollution Burden and is considered a disadvantaged community.Therefore,the commenter requests that the City ensure that the Project does not adversely impact neighboring disadvantaged communities. The City concurs with the commenter's description of the responsibilities of CalEPA and understands the designation that would be applied to the census tract that the Project occurs in. Although the Project construction and operations emissions are below the daily maximum thresholds established by SCAQMD for criteria pollutants (VOC, NOx, CO, SOx, PM1o, and PM2.5), a mobile emissions HRA was prepared for the Project on March 13, 2020 to further analyze the potential for impacts to sensitive receptors in the Project area (residences and schools).The results of the HRA indicate that the maximum risk estimate associated with the proposed Project is 0.53 in one million, which is substantially less than the applicable threshold of 10 in one million (refer to Attachment 1 of this response to comments document,Table ES-1).Therefore, construction and operation of the Project is not expected to adversely impact the public in the surrounding area. Response to 3-6 and 3-7 The commenter states that the IS/MND concluded that the Project would not expose nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.The commenter states that this conclusion was reached by comparing air pollutant emissions to SCAQMD localized significance thresholds.The commenter states that this determination should not be made without preparation of a HRA.The commenter urges the City to prepare an HRA due to the Project's location near residences and schools in an area with multiple sources of air pollution. As stated above in Response to Comment 3-5, a mobile emissions HRA was prepared for the Project on March 13, 2020 to further analyze the potential for impacts to sensitive receptors in the Project area (residences and schools).The results of the HRA indicate that the maximum risk estimate associated with the proposed Project is 0.53 in one million, which is substantially less than the applicable threshold of 10 in one million (refer to Attachment 1 of this response to comments document,Table ES-1).Therefore, construction and operation of the Project is not expected to adversely impact the public in the surrounding area. 'http://www.agmd.goy/nav/about/initiatives/community-efforts/environmental-justice/ab617-134/ab-617-community-air-monitoring 17 City of Lake Elsinore Pennington Industrial Project Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND Response to 3-8 and 3-9 The commenter states that the air emissions reported in the IS/MND were estimated under the assumption that the Project would not be used for cold storage.The commenter states that since the Project description did not explicitly state that the industrial building uses would not include cold storage space,there is a possibility that trucks and trailers visiting the Project site would be equipped with transport refrigeration units(TRUs). The commenter states that TRUs on trucks and trailers can emit large quantities of diesel exhaust while operating the area.The commenter states that residencies and other sensitive receptors (e.g., daycare facilities, senior care facilities, and schools) located near where these TRUs could be operating would result in significant cancer risk.The commenter requests that the City revise the IS/MND to clearly define the Project description. The City understands the concerns regarding TRUs and at this time the Project does not propose cold storage or trucks/trailers equipped with TRUs. Future tenants of the Project are currently unknown and any future construction of cold storage facilities would require additional City review and approvals, including an updated Air Quality Study and HRA.The IS/MND Project description adequately describes the Project as it is currently proposed. Response to 3-10 and 3-11 The commenter states that if the Project would not be used for cold storage,the City is urged to include one of the following design measures in a revised IS/MND: • A Project design measure requiring contractual language in tenant lease agreements that prohibits tenants from operating TRUs within the Project site; or • A condition requiring a restrictive covenant over the parcel that prohibits the applicant's use of TRUs on the property unless the applicant seeks and receives an amendment to its conditional use permit allowing such use. The commenter requests that the City model air pollutant emissions and prepare a HRA from onsite TRUs in a revised IS/MND if such uses are allowed.The commenter states that the revised IS/MND should also include the air pollutant reduction measures listed in Attachment A to the CARB letter. At this time the Project does not propose cold storage or trucks/trailers equipped with TRUs. An amendment to the conditional use permit is already a City requirement if the construction of cold storage space is proposed in the future since it is not included in the current Project description.The City's review of the conditional use permit amendment would include a revised air quality analysis and HRA, which would be circulated for public comment if new Project impacts or mitigation measures are found to be required. Response to 3-12 The commenter states that the Project's air quality impacts were modeled using mobile emissions factors obtained from CARB's 2014 Emission Factors model (EMFAC2014),which may have resulted in lower emissions for NOx and diesel PM emissions.The commenter recommends that the Project emissions be re-calculated using the CARB 2017 Emissions Factors model (EMFAC2017) in place of EMFAC2014 when modeling mobile air pollutant emissions. At the time that the Air Quality Study was prepared for the Project, EMFAC2014 was the only model approved for use by USEPA. At the request of the commenter, the mobile emissions for the Project City of Lake Elsinore Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND Pennington Industrial Project were re-calculated using EMFAC2017 and the results and output are provided as Attachment 3 of this response to comments document.The results of the modeling using EMFAC2017 for Project construction and operations emissions are below the daily maximum thresholds established by SCAQMD for criteria pollutants (VOC, NOx, CO, SOx, PM1o, and PM2.$)• Response to 3-13 and 3-14 The commenter states that lead agencies may only adopt MNDs if the "initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency that the Project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment."The commenter states that based on the comments provided above, CARB staff is concerned that the City's current IS/MND does not meet this threshold. The commenter states that the based upon the comments listed above, CARB staff believe that there would be substantial evidence in the record to find that the Project may have a significant effect on the environment. In this even,the City would be required to prepare a full EIR for the Project under the "fair argument" standard. The City has prepared a mobile emissions HRA and remodeled the air quality emissions using EMFAC2017 at the request of CARB. Cold storage and the use of TRUs is not proposed and, therefore, is not included in the Project description or environmental analysis.The results of the HRA and all air quality modeling remain well below all applicable thresholds. As a result,there are no significant impacts associated with the proposed Project that would require mitigation or the preparation of an EIR. Response to 3-15 The commenter recommends that the applicant and City prepare a HRA evaluating the Project's potential operational health impacts, remodel mobile emissions using EMFAC2017, define whether the proposed industrial uses include cold storage and recirculate the IS/MND for public review.The commenter states that if the updated and recirculated IS/MND indicates there is a fair argument that the Project may have a significant effect on the environment, and an EIR should be prepared. The Project does not propose cold storage; therefore, it is not included in the Project description. A HRA was prepared for the Project and the emissions remodeled using EMFAC2017 in March 2020 (see Attachments 1 and 3).The results of these analysis indicate that when modeled with EMFAC2017, Project construction and operations emissions are still below the daily maximum thresholds established by SCAQMD for criteria pollutants (VOC, NOx, CO, SOx, PM1o, and PM2.5). Additionally, a mobile emissions HRA was prepared for the Project on March 13, 2020 to further analyze the potential for impacts to sensitive receptors in the Project area (residences and schools). The results of the HRA indicate that the maximum risk estimate associated with the proposed Project is 0.53 in one million,which is substantially less than the applicable threshold of 10 in one refer to Attachment 1 of this response to comments document,Table ES-1). CEQA requires that where an impact is found to be significant, measures must be implemented to reduce the impact to a less than significant level.The results of the Project air quality analysis and HRA concluded that construction and operation of the Project would not exceed applicable air quality and health risk thresholds,therefore no impact would occur, and no mitigation is required pursuant to CEQA. 19 City of Lake Elsinore Pennington Industrial Project Responses to Comments to the Draft IS/MND The City believes that the IS/MND is the appropriate document for this Project under CEQA since all potential significant impacts (biological resources, cultural resources,geology/soils,traffic and noise) can be reduced to a level of less than significant with mitigation. OURBAM Pennington Industrial MOBILE SOURCE HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE PREPARED BY: Haseeb Qureshi hqureshi@urbanxroads.com (949) 336-5987 MARCH 13, 2020 12628-04 HRA Report Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLEOF CONTENTS...........................................................................................................................I APPENDICES .......................................................................................................................................I LISTOF EXHIBITS................................................................................................................................II LISTOF TABLES ..................................................................................................................................II LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS............................................................................................................III EXECUTIVESUMMARY.......................................................................................................................1 1 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................4 1.1 Site Location..................................................................................................................................5 1.2 Project Description........................................................................................................................5 2 BACKGROUND...........................................................................................................................8 2.1 Background on Recommended Methodology..............................................................................8 2.2 Emissions Estimation ....................................................................................................................8 2.3 Exposure Quantification .............................................................................................................13 2.4 Carcinogenic Chemical Risk.........................................................................................................15 2.5 Non-carcinogenic Exposures.......................................................................................................17 2.7 Potential Project-Related DPM Source Cancer and Non-Cancer Risks.......................................18 3 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................22 4 CERTIFICATION........................................................................................................................24 APPENDICES APPENDIX 2.1: AERMOD MODEL INPUT/OUTPUT APPENDIX 2.2: RISK CALCULATIONS 12628-04 HRA Report URBAN F}RC.3 RQfkf3 I Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT ES-A: RECEPTOR LOCATIONS..................................................................................................2 EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP.............................................................................................................6 EXHIBIT 1-B: SITE PLAN......................................................................................................................7 EXHIBIT 2-A: MODELED EMISSION SOURCES AND RECEPTORS...........................................................11 EXHIBIT 2-B: WIND ROSE (SRA 25) ....................................................................................................14 EXHIBIT 2-C: RECEPTOR LOCATIONS..................................................................................................19 LIST OF TABLES TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CANCER AND NON-CANCER RISKS ............................................................3 TABLE 2-1: 2021 WEIGHTED AVERAGE DPM EMISSIONS FACTORS ....................................................10 TABLE 2-2: DPM EMISSIONS FROM PROJECT TRUCKS (2021 ANALYSIS YEAR).....................................12 TABLE 2-3:AERMOD MODEL PARAMETERS.......................................................................................13 TABLE 2-4: EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL CANCER RISK(30 YEAR RESIDENTIAL)............16 TABLE 2-5: EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL CANCER RISK(25 YEAR WORKER)..................16 TABLE 2-6: EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL CANCER RISK(9 YEAR SCHOOL CHILD)...........16 TABLE 2-7: SUMMARY OF CANCER AND NON-CANCER RISKS............................................................20 12628-04 HRA Report REAM f ......9,P.� Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS (1) Reference µg Microgram AERMOD American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model APS Auxiliary Power System AQMD Air Quality Management District ARB Air Resources Board CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CPF Cancer Potency Factor DPM Diesel Particulate Matter EMFAC Emission Factor Model EPA Environmental Protection Agency HHD Heavy Heavy-Duty HI Hazard Index HRA Health Risk Assessment LHD Light Heavy-Duty MATES Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study MEIR Maximally Exposed Individual Receptor MEISC Maximally Exposed Individual School Child MEIW Maximally Exposed Individual Worker MHD Medium Heavy-Duty NAD North American Datum OEHHA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment PCE Passenger Car Equivalent PM10 Particulate Matter 10 microns in diameter or less Project Pennington Industrial REL Reference Exposure Level RM Recommended Measures SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SRA Source Receptor Area TAC Toxic Air Contaminant TIA Traffic Impact Analysis URF Unit Risk Factor UTM Universal Transverse Mercator VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled 12628-04 HRA Report URBAM Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment This page intentionally left blank 12628-04 HRA Report URBAN S n 4 c5RQfkP f Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report evaluates the potential mobile source health risk impacts to sensitive receptors (residents)and adjacent workers associated with the development of the proposed Project, more specifically, health risk impacts as a result of exposure to diesel particulate matter (DPM) as a result of heavy-duty diesel trucks accessing the site. This section summarizes the significance criteria and Project mobile source health risks. Sensitive receptors near the Project site include existing residential homes and school uses, as described below. Other sensitive land uses in the Project study area that are located at greater distances from modeled sources than those identified in this analysis will experience lower concentration levels, and consequently lesser risk than those presented in this report since DPM dissipates with distance from the source and additional attenuation the shielding of intervening structures. To assess the potential for long-term operational impacts, the following receptor locations as shown on Exhibit ES-A were identified as representative locations for focused analysis. R1: Located approximately 916 feet north of the Project site, R1 represents an existing residential home located at 18570 Collier Avenue. R2: Located approximately 640 feet east of the Project site, R2 represents an existing residential home located at 18740 Collier Avenue. R3: Location R3 represents the existing Keith McCarthy Academy buildings located approximately 10 feet southeast of the Project site. R4: Location R4 represents the existing Ortega High School/Lake Elsinore Head Start Kindergarten buildings located approximately 326 feet southeast of the Project site. R5: Location R4 represents the existing California Online Academy buildings located approximately 27 feet southeast of the Project site. The results of the health risk assessment of potential cancer risk from Project-generated DPM emissions are provided in Table ES-1 for the Project. As shown, the Project would not result in any health risk impacts and a less than significant impact would occur. URBAN 12628-04 HRA Report 1 Pennington Industrial m 6w Source He w RiskAssessment EXHIBIT ES-A: RECEPTORLOCATIONS - . - � \� 016 . ` � & � 41 - � - / > `� ' ' ', • ' - � � � ■ � �A- % . • �. . , � � 2� « � � � She , .N � % ' / a OW � ■ ^ . , � � ` 7. . � - SIP . �\ L � LE N mmm _Ava.La_ _ _ainim. . iian_mmRm_, 32-C!ara0c_rrw=. W ,mb GaRior Ave,Lake rilsinciv Pmng 12z _ *_j GKI.Q_er�940__nrrg _�mm 60 : _._.� ^ � m M2.a_.,_fadun" ,ivip,pnmooEake _am&tail6_m_ :mom_ dmill 495.,__Gali_m___ wG3qHRaReport C URBAN 2 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CANCER AND NON-CANCER RISKS Maximum Lifetime Significance Exceeds Time Period Location Cancer Risk Threshold Significance (Risk per (Risk per Threshold Million) Million) 30 Year Residential R1: 18570 Collier Avenue 0.53 10 NO Exposure 30 Year Residential R2: 18740 Collier Avenue 0.23 10 NO Exposure 25 Year Worker R3: Keith McCarthy Academy 0.28 10 NO Exposure 9 Year School R3: Keith McCarthy Academy 0.54 10 NO Child Exposure 25 Year Worker R4: Ortega High School/Lake Elsinore Head 0.04 10 NO Exposure Start Kindergarten 9 Year School R4: Ortega High School/Lake Elsinore Head 0.07 10 NO Child Exposure Start Kindergarten 25 Year Worker R5:Southern California Online Academy 0.10 10 NO Exposure 9 Year School R5:Southern California Online Academy 0.19 10 NO Child Exposure Maximum Exceeds Time Period Location Hazard Significance Significance Index Threshold Threshold Annual R1: 18570 Collier Avenue 0.0002 1.0 NO Average Annual R2: 18740 Collier Avenue 0.00008 1.0 NO Average Annual R3: Keith McCarthy Academy 0.00095 1.0 NO Average Annual R4: Ortega High School/Lake Elsinore Head 0.00013 1.0 NO Average Start Kindergarten Annual R5:Southern California Online Academy 0.00034 1.0 NO Average 12628-04 HRA Report URBAN �w Q 4ga��nn g 3 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment 1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Health Risk Assessment (HRA) is to evaluate Project-related impacts to sensitive receptors (residential, schools) and adjacent workers as a result of heavy-duty diesel trucks accessing the site. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) reviewed the conceptual site plan for the proposed project and provided input to the City on the scope of the air quality analysis. SCAQMD identifies that if a proposed Project is expected to generate/attract heavy-duty diesel trucks, which emit diesel particulate matter (DPM), preparation of a mobile source HRA is recommended. This document serves to meet the SCAQMD's request for preparation of a HRA. The mobile source HRA has been prepared in accordance with the document Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risk from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis (1) and is comprised of all relevant and appropriate procedures presented by the U.S. EPA, California Environmental Protection Agency and SCAQMD. Cancer risk is expressed in terms of expected incremental incidence per million population.The SCAQMD has established an incidence rate of ten (10) persons per million as the maximum acceptable incremental cancer risk due to DPM exposure.This threshold serves to determine whether or not a given project has a potentially significant development-specific and cumulative impact. The AQMD has published a report on how to address cumulative impacts from air pollution: White Paper on Potential Control Strategies to Address Cumulative Impacts from Air Pollution (2). In this report the AQMD clearly states (Page D-3): "...the AQMD uses the some significance thresholds for project specific and cumulative impacts for all environmental topics analyzed in an Environmental Assessment or EIR. The only case where the significance thresholds for project specific and cumulative impacts differ is the Hazard Index (HI) significance threshold for toxic air contaminant (TAC) emissions. The project specific (project increment)significance threshold is HI>1.0 while the cumulative(facility-wide)is HI>3.0. It should be noted that the HI is only one of three TAC emission significance thresholds considered (when applicable)in a CEQA analysis. The other two are the maximum individual cancer risk(MICR)and the cancer burden, both of which use the same significance thresholds(MICR of 10 in 1 million and cancerburden of 0.5)for project specific and cumulative impacts. Projects that exceed the project-specific significance thresholds are considered by the SCAQMD to be cumulatively considerable. This is the reason project-specific and cumulative significance thresholds are the same. Conversely, projects that do not exceed the project-specific thresholds are generally not considered to be cumulatively significant." The SCAQMD has also established non-carcinogenic risk parameters for use in HRAs. Non- carcinogenic risks are quantified by calculating a "hazard index," expressed as the ratio between the ambient pollutant concentration and its toxicity or Reference Exposure Level (REL). An REL is a concentration at or below which health effects are not likely to occur. A hazard index less of than one (1.0) means that adverse health effects are not expected. Within this analysis, non- carcinogenic exposures of less than 1.0 are considered less-than-significant. 12628-04 HRA Report Ld�URBAN Swn}}a snng 4 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment 1.1 SITE LOCATION The proposed Pennington Industrial Project is located at the southeast corner of the Chaney Street and Minthorn Street in the City of Lake Elsinore, as shown on Exhibit 1-A. 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project is proposed to consist of 91,140 square feet of manufacturing use (gross floor area), as shown on Exhibit 1-13. At the time this HRA was prepared, the future tenants of the proposed Project were unknown. The Project is anticipated to be constructed and occupied by 2021. Per the Pennington Industrial Project Focused Traffic Evaluation (TIA) prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc. the Project is expected to generate a total of approximately 359 two-way vehicular trips per day (180 inbound and 179 outbound) which includes 71 two-way truck trips per day (36 inbound and 35 outbound) (3). This HRA evaluates the potential impacts resulting from diesel exhaust from the 71 two-way truck trips generated by the Project. 12628-04 HRA Report URBAN }a 5 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP vp IVx � 5 ram• M# -SITE4. ' 4 t," '�• f 5 Cj 4m; 'f w �r r A4bSr.LFFyr � lfngfY T. � 4�t �{ X. tom• f#,�,tb,�a�,S1S[�+,ie56A� rd f t 6i5 OT.&Iter,mu r{ 12628-04 HRA Report LO�URBAN CnV5.5"vna3L 6 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment EXHIBIT 1-B: SITE PLAN 3 II _—_—_—_—_— _—_—_— _— r I I _ 170, 1 a6 I 1 I le 182C0 SF i uqom } �19�Da SF)TMSF _ ray 99 4403E 4 *� eV MRh9l ' 4U' I � fi4' A W b 100,o I l r II II I �p V aEDI ON[ I I _ 2 F I ppr�y� � 2fs• 1 f I G• "Y■1 I + f 1 OF Aa,%a SF 1 —y f+EZ?-r3.M SF — 1 CLR.HGT 2W YARD 1 276' i F I ----------------------'--- 44— LX1I --� S sf-RELN'.VALL I 12628-04 HRA Report Ld RBAN C:e 4 S5JR4fkP S 7 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment 2 BACKGROUND 2.1 BACKGROUND ON RECOMMENDED METHODOLOGY As noted above, this HRA is based on SCAQMD guidelines to produce conservative estimates of risk posed by exposure to DPM. The conservative nature of this analysis is due primarily to the following factors: • The ARB-adopted diesel exhaust Unit Risk Factor (URF) of 300 in one million per µg/m3 is based upon the upper 95 percentile of estimated risk for each of the epidemiological studies utilized to develop the URF. Using the 951h percentile URF represents a very conservative(health-protective) risk posed by DPM. • The emissions derived assume that every truck accessing the project site will idle for 15 minutes under the unmitigated scenario, this is an overestimation of actual idling times and thus conservative.' It should be noted that ARB's anti-idling requirements impose a 5-minute maximum idling time and therefore the analysis conservatively overestimates DPM emissions from idling by a factor of 3. 2.2 EMISSIONS ESTIMATION 2.2.1 ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE TRUCK ACTIVITY Vehicle DPM emissions were estimated using emission factors for particulate matter less than 10µm in diameter(PM1o)generated with the 2017 version of the Emission FACtor model (EMFAC) developed by the ARB. EMFAC 2017 is a mathematical model that was developed to calculate emission rates from motor vehicles that operate on highways, freeways, and local roads in California and is commonly used by the ARB to project changes in future emissions from on-road mobile sources (4). The most recent version of this model, EMFAC 2017, incorporates regional motor vehicle data, information and estimates regarding the distribution of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by speed, and number of starts per day. Several distinct emission processes are included in EMFAC 2017. Emission factors calculated using EMFAC 2017 are expressed in units of grams per vehicle miles traveled (g/VMT) or grams per idle-hour (g/idle-hr), depending on the emission process. The emission processes and corresponding emission factor units associated with diesel particulate exhaustforthis Project are presented below. For this Project, annual average PM10 emission factors were generated by running EMFAC 2017 in EMFAC Mode for vehicles in the Riverside County jurisdiction. The EMFAC Mode generates emission factors in terms of grams of pollutant emitted per vehicle activity and can calculate a matrix of emission factors at specific values of temperature, relative humidity, and vehicle speed. Although the Project is required to comply with ARB's idling limit of 5 minutes,staff at SCAQMD recommends that the on-site idling emissions should be estimated for 15 minutes of truck idling(personal communication,in person,with Jillian Wong,December 22,2016),which would take into account on-site idling which occurs while the trucks are waiting to pull up to the truck bays,idling at the bays,idling at check-in and check-out,etc. 12628-04 HRA Report URBAN Swn}ga �nng 8 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment The model was run for speeds traveled in the vicinity of the Project.The vehicle travel speeds for each segment modeled are summarized below. • Idling—on-site loading/unloading and truck gate • 5 miles per hour—on-site vehicle movement including driving and maneuvering • 25 miles per hour—off-site vehicle movement including driving and maneuvering. Calculated emission factors are shown at Table 2-1. As a conservative measure, a 2021 EMFAC 2017 run was conducted and a static 2021 emissions factor data set was used for the entire duration of analysis herein (e.g., 30 years). Use of 2021 emission factors would overstate potential impacts since this approach assumes that emission factors remain "static" and do not change over time due to fleet turnover or cleaner technology with lower emissions that would incorporated after 2021. Additionally, based on EMFAC 2017, Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks comprise of 47.72% diesel, Medium-Heavy-Duty Trucks comprise of 82.28% diesel, and Heavy-Heavy-Duty Trucks comprise of 96.13% diesel trucks and have been accounted for accordingly in the emissions factor generation. The vehicle DPM exhaust emissions were calculated for running exhaust emissions. The running exhaust emissions were calculated by applying the running exhaust PM10 emission factor (g/VMT) from EMFAC over the total distance traveled. The following equation was used to estimate off-site emissions for each of the different vehicle classes comprising the mobile sources (4): EmissionsspeedA (g/s) = EFRunExhaust (g/VMT) * Distance (VMT/trip) * Number of Trips (trips/day)/ seconds per day Where: EmissionsspeedA (g/s): Vehicle emissions at a given speed A; EFRunExhaust (g/VMT): EMFAC running exhaust PM10 emission factor at speed A; Distance (VMT/trip): Total distance traveled per trip. Similar to off-site traffic, on-site vehicle running emissions were calculated by applying the running exhaust PM10 emission factor (g/VMT) from EMFAC and the total vehicle trip number over the length of the driving path usingthe same formula presented above for on-site emissions. In addition, on-site vehicle idling exhaust emissions were calculated by applying the idle exhaust PM10 emission factor (g/idle-hr) from EMFAC and the total truck trip over the total idle time (15 minutes). The following equation was used to estimate the on-site vehicle idling emissions for each of the different vehicle classes (4): Emissions;die (g/s) = EF;die (g/hr) * Number of Trips (trips/day) * Idling Time (min/trip) 60 minutes per hour/seconds per day Where: Emissions;die (g/s): Vehicle emissions during idling; 12628-04 HRA Report Ld�URBAN Swn}}a srtssS 9 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment EFidle(g/s): EMFAC idle exhaust PM10 emission factor. TABLE 2-1: 2021 WEIGHTED AVERAGE DPM EMISSIONS FACTORS Speed Weighted Average 0(idling) 0.12499 (g/idle-hr) 5 0.10046(g/s) 25 0.04096(g/s) Each roadway was modeled as a line source (made up of multiple adjacent volume sources). Due to the large number of volume sources modeled for this analysis, the corresponding coordinates of each volume source have not been included in this report but are included in Appendix "2.1". The DPM emission rate for each volume source was calculated by multiplying the emission factor (based on the average travel speed along the roadway) by the number of trips and the distance traveled along each roadway segment and dividing the result by the number of volume sources along that roadway, as illustrated on Table 2-2. The modeled emission sources are illustrated on Exhibit 2-A. The modeled truck travel routes included in the HRA are based on the truck trip distributions (inbound and outbound) available from the Project's TIA (3). The modeled truck route is consistent with the trip distribution patterns identified in the Project's traffic study, is supported by substantial evidence, and was modeled to determine the potential impacts to sensitive receptors along the primary truck routes. The modeling domain is limited to the Project's primary truck route and includes off-site sources in the study area for more than 1 mile. This modeling domain is more conservative than using only a % mile modeling domain which is supported by substantial evidence since several studies have shown that the greatest potential risks occur within a % mile of the primary source of emissions (5) (in the case of the Project this is the on-site idling and on-site travel). On-site truck idling was estimated to occur as trucks enter and travel through the facility. Although the Project is required to comply with CARB's idling limit of 5 minutes, staff at SCAQMD recommends that the on-site idling emissions should be estimated for 15 minutes of truck idling (6), which would take into account on-site idling which occurs while the trucks are waiting to pull up to the truck bays, idling at the bays, idling at check-in and check-out, etc. As such,this analysis estimated truck idling at 15 minutes, consistent with SCAQMD's recommendation. Per the Pennington Industrial Project Focused Traffic Evaluation (TIA) prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc. the Project is expected to generate a total of approximately 359 two-way vehicular trips per day (180 inbound and 179 outbound) which includes 71 two-way truck trips per day (36 inbound and 35 outbound) (3). This HRA evaluates the potential impacts resulting from diesel exhaust from the 71 two-way truck trips generated by the Project. 12628-04 HRA Report Ld�URBAN Swn}}a srtssA 10 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment EXHIBIT I-A: MODELED EMISSION SOURCES AND RECEPTORS A .+ y + dJ 4, Awp j. }5 4+G ` lk i 1 I�`•f t # F A OP L # LEGEND: R1 c8574 C.oeier A' ,Luke EMlnc '4 diffltllk6 rmrA i&*pbx la Prom-i6e boundhry Ile ie&e C.2.Generul C.,immertml R2 18740 Cohn,&,a,Lek&[Mncre —OnSiE9 91Sd O&Si4BTNCk Tt&VN CAI.Conmwrdsl Mam.WaMng OKI 849 FNCk kon MI.Lim:Wd MenurecArAng RSA McICY M€C9flhYhc�7L1&nh' ..I PA?,09rwrpi M9nvamrri0 R4.Oiiege FFgh S��€a1lLake Elelnore HeaC Stan IUMerq&r69n '����Pr�'uhl�dlnsbMk'n9� R5:Sc+mwc,;rirNr1i@ Oniin@k1 We" 12628-04 HRA Report .... RBAM 11 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment TABLE 2-2: DPM EMISSIONS FROM PROJECT TRUCKS(2021 ANALYSIS YEAR) Truck Emission Rates VMT a Truck Emission Rate b Truck Emission Rate b Daily Truck Emissions c Modeled Emission Rates Source Trucks Per Day (miles/day) (grams/mile) (grams/idle-hour) (grams/day) (g/second) On-Site Idling Building 1 15 0.1600 0.60 6.946E-06 On-Site Idling Building 2 13 0.1600 0.52 6.020E-06 On-Site Idling Building 3 8 0.1600 0.30 3.473E-06 On-Site Trawl Building 1 30 2.40 0.0955 0.23 2.648E-06 On-Site Trawl Building 2 26 1.50 0.0955 0.14 1.659E-06 On-Site Travel Building 3 15 0.98 0.0955 0.09 1.087E-06 Off-Site Travel 10%Inbound/Outbound 7 0.93 0.0385 0.04 4.163E-07 Off-Site Travel 40%Inbound/Outbound 28 1.70 0.0385 0.07 7.591E-07 Off-Site Travel 20%Inbound/Outbound 14 0.84 0.0385 0.03 3.728E-07 Off-Site Travel 30%Inbound/Outbound 21 3.32 0.0385 0.13 1.482E-06 Off-Site Travel 10%Inbound/Outbound 7 0.85 0.0385 0.03 3.793E-07 Off-Site Travel 50%Inbound/Outbound 36 12.61 0.0385 0.49 5.620E-06 a Vehicle miles traveled are for modeled truck route only. b Emission rates determined using EMFAC 2017.Idle emission rates are expressed in grams per idle hour rather than grams per mile. c This column includes the total truck travel and truck idle emissions.For idle emissions this column includes emissions based on the assumption that each truck idles for 15 minutes. 12628-04 HRA Report O URBAN �RQrilt4l��s 12 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment 2.3 EXPOSURE QUANTIFICATION The analysis herein has been conducted in accordance with the guidelines in the Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis (1). SCAQMD recommends using the Environmental Protection Agency's (U.S. EPA's) AERMOD model. For purposes of this analysis, the Lakes AERMOD View (Version 9.7.0) was used to calculate annual average particulate concentrations associated with site operations. Lakes AERMOD View was utilized to incorporate the U.S. EPA's latest AERMOD Version 19191 (7). The model offers additional flexibility by allowing the user to assign an initial release height and vertical dispersion parameters for mobile sources representative of a roadway. For this HRA, the roadways were modeled as adjacent volume sources. Roadways were modeled using the U.S. EPA's haul route methodology for modeling of on-site and off-site truck movement. More specifically,the Haul Road Volume Source Calculator in Lakes AERMOD View has been utilized to determine the release height parameters. Based on the U.S. EPA methodology, the Project's modeled sources would result in a release height of 3.49 meters, and an initial lateral dimension of 4.0 meters, and an initial vertical dimension of 3.25 meters. SCAQMD required model parameters are presented in Table 2-3 (8). The model requires additional input parameters including emission data and local meteorology. Meteorological data from the SCAQMD's Lake Elsinore monitoring station (SRA 25) was used to represent local weather conditions and prevailing winds (9). A wind rose exhibit of the Perris monitoring station is provided at Exhibit 2-B. TABLE 2-3:AERMOD MODEL PARAMETERS Dispersion Coefficient Urban Population 2,189,641 Terrain Elevated (Regulatory Default) Averaging Time 1 year(5-year Meteorological Data Set) Receptor Height 0 meters(Regulatory Default) Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates for World Geodetic System (WGS) 84 were used to locate the project boundaries,each volume source location, and receptor locations in the project vicinity. The AERMOD dispersion model summary output files for the proposed facility are presented in Appendix "2.1". Receptors may be placed at applicable structure locations for residential, worker, and school properties and not necessarily the boundaries of these uses. It should be noted that the primary purpose of receptor placement is focused on long-term exposure. For example, the HRA evaluates the potential health risks to residential, worker, and school children over a period of 30, 25, and 9 years of exposure, respectively. As such, even though it is unlikely to occur in practical terms (because the amount of time spent indoors), this study assumes that a resident, worker, or school child would be exposed over a long-period of time for 12 or 24-hours per day at the structure where they reside, work, or occupy. 12628-04 HRA Report Ld�URBAN Swn}}a snng 13 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment EXHIBIT 2-B:WIND ROSE(SRA 25) NORTH ' 9.44% 7 08% 4.72% - % t WEST ` EAST' ,kw wM SE= {ITIVS 5-70 - 8-80 urFi. 0 3-60 . 5-70 2-10 -3,60 - 0-40 - 2-10 Cairns- 2- 12628-04 HRA Report .�.� 14 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment Consistent with SCAQMD modeling guidance, all receptors were set to the elevation so that only ground-level concentrations are analyzed (9). United States Geological Survey (USGS) Digital Elevation Model (DEM) terrain data based on a 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map series using AERMAP was utilized in the HRA modeling to set elevations. Furthermore, worker receptors immediately adjacent to the Project site have been evaluated in the HRA. Any impacts to workers located further away from the Project site than the modeled worker receptors would have a lesser impact than what has already been disclosed in the HRA at the MEIW. Similarly, any school receptors located further away from the Project site than the modeled school receptors would have a lesser impact than what has already been disclosed in the HRA at the MEISC. Discrete variants for daily breathing rates, exposure frequency, and exposure duration were obtained from relevant distribution profiles presented in the 2015 OEHHA Guidelines. Tables 2- 4 through 2-6 summarize the Exposure Parameters for Residents, Offsite Worker, and School exposure scenarios based on 2015 OEHHA Guidelines. Appendix 2.2 includes the detailed risk calculation. 2.4 CARCINOGENIC CHEMICAL RISK Based on the South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds (10) (April 2019), emissions of toxic air contaminants (TACs) are considered significant if a HRA shows an increased risk of greater than 10 in one million. Based on guidance from the SCAQMD in the document Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis (1), for purposes of this analysis, 10 in one million is used as the cancer risk threshold for the proposed Project. Excess cancer risks are estimated as the upper-bound incremental probability that an individual will develop cancer over a lifetime as a direct result of exposure to potential carcinogens over a specified exposure duration. The estimated risk is expressed as a unitless probability. The cancer risk attributed to a chemical is calculated by multiplying the chemical intake or dose at the human exchange boundaries(e.g., lungs)by the chemical-specific cancer potency factor(CPF). A risk level of 10 in one million implies a likelihood that up to 10 people, out of one million equally exposed people would contract cancer if exposed continuously(24 hours per day)to the levels of toxic air contaminants over a specified duration of time. As an example, the risk of dying from accidental drowning is 1,000 in a million which is 100 times more than the SCAQMD's threshold of 10 in one million, the nearest comparison to 10 in one million is the 7 in one million lifetime chance that an individual would be struck by lightning (11). Guidance from CARB and the California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) recommends a refinement to the standard point estimate approach when alternate human body weights and breathing rates are utilized to 12628-04 HRA Report Ld�URBAN Swn}}a snng 15 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment TABLE 2-4: EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL CANCER RISK (30 YEAR RESIDENTIAL) Age Daily Age Exposure Fraction Exposure Exposure Breathing Specific Duration of Time Frequency Time Rate (L/kg- Factor (years) at Home (days/year) (hours/day) day) -0.25 to 0 361 10 0.25 0.85 350 24 0 to 2 1090 10 2 0.85 350 24 2 to 16 572 3 14 0.72 350 24 16 to 30 261 1 14 0.73 350 24 TABLE 2-5: EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL CANCER RISK (25 YEAR WORKER) Age Daily Age Exposure Exposure Exposure Breathing Specific Duration Frequency Time Rate (L/kg- Factor (years) (days/year) (hours/day) day) 16 to 41 230 1 25 250 12 TABLE 2-6: EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL CANCER RISK(9 YEAR SCHOOL CHILD) Age Daily Age Exposure Exposure Exposure Breathing Specific Duration Frequency Time Rate (L/kg- Factor (years) (days/year) (hours/day) day) a 9 year 745 3 9 180 12 duration a To represent the unique characteristics of the school-based population,the assessment employed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's guidance to develop viable dose estimates based on reasonable maximum exposures (RME).RME's are defined as the"highest exposure that is reasonably expected to occur"for a given receptor population.As a result,lifetime risk values for the student population were adjusted to account for an exposure duration of 180 days per year for nine(9)years.The 9 year exposure duration is also consistent with OEHHA Recommendations and consistent with the exposure duration utilized in school-based risk assessments for various schools within the Los Angeles County Unified School District(LAUSD)that have been accepted by the SCAQMD. 12628-04 HRA Report Ld�URBAN Swn}ga �nng 16 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment assess risk for susceptible subpopulations such as children. For the inhalation pathway, the procedure requires the incorporation of several discrete variates to effectively quantify dose. Once determined, contaminant dose is multiplied by the cancer potency factor (CPF) in units of inverse dose expressed in milligrams per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day)-1 to derive the cancer risk estimate. Therefore, to assess exposures, the following dose algorithm was utilized. DOSEair = (Cair x [BR/BW] x A x EF) x (1 x 10 -6) Where: DOSEair = chronic daily intake (mg/kg/day) Cair = concentration of contaminant in air (ug/m3) [BR/BW] = daily breathing rate normalized to body weight(L/kg BW-day) A = inhalation absorption factor EF = exposure frequency (days/365 days) BW = body weight (kg) 1 x 10 -6 = conversion factors (ug to mg, L to m3) RISKair = DOSEair x CPF x ED/AT Where: DOSEair = chronic daily intake (mg/kg/day) CPF = cancer potency factor ED = number of years within particular age group AT = averaging time 2.5 NON-CARCINOGENIC EXPOSURES An evaluation of the potential noncarcinogenic effects of chronic exposures was also conducted. Adverse health effects are evaluated by comparing a compound's annual concentration with its toxicity factor or Reference Exposure Level (REL). The REL for diesel particulates was obtained from OEHHA for this analysis. The chronic reference exposure level (REL) for DPM was established by OEHHA as 5 µg/m3 (OEHHA Toxicity Criteria Database, http://www.oehha.org/risk/chemicaldb/index.asp). The non-cancer hazard index was calculated (consistent with SCAQMD methodology) as follows: The relationship for the non-cancer health effects of DPM is given by the following equation: HIDPM = CDPM/RELDPM Where: 12628-04 HRA Report URBAN Fv H Q S$R47i4{7 S 17 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment HIDPM = Hazard Index; an expression of the potential for non-cancer health effects. CDPM = Annual average DPM concentration (µg/m3). RELDPM = Reference exposure level (REL) for DPM; the DPM concentration at which no adverse health effects are anticipated. For purposes of this analysis the hazard index for the respiratory endpoint totaled less than one for all receptors in the project vicinity, and thus is less than significant. 2.7 POTENTIAL PROJECT-RELATED DPM SOURCE CANCER AND NON-CANCER RISKS2 Sensitive receptors near the Project site include existing residential homes and school uses, as described below. Other sensitive land uses in the Project study area that are located at greater distances from modeled sources than those identified in this analysis will experience lower concentration levels, and consequently lesser risk than those presented in this report since DPM dissipates with distance from the source and additional attenuation the shielding of intervening structures. To assess the potential for long-term operational impacts, the following receptor locations as shown on Exhibit 2-C were identified as representative locations for focused analysis. R1: Located approximately 916 feet north of the Project site, R1 represents an existing residential home located at 18570 Collier Avenue. R2: Located approximately 640 feet east of the Project site, R2 represents an existing residential home located at 18740 Collier Avenue. R3: Location R3 represents the existing Keith McCarthy Academy buildings located approximately 10 feet southeast of the Project site. R4: Location R4 represents the existing Ortega High School/Lake Elsinore Head Start Kindergarten buildings located approximately 326 feet southeast of the Project site. R5: Location R4 represents the existing California Online Academy buildings located approximately 27 feet southeast of the Project site. The results of the health risk assessment of potential cancer risk from Project-generated DPM emissions are provided in Table 2-7 for the Project. As shown,the Project would not result in any health risk impacts and a less than significant impact would occur. 2 SCAQMD guidance(2)does not require assessment of the potential health risk to on-site workers. Excerpts from the document OEHHA Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines—The Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments(OEHHA 2003),also indicate that it is not necessary to examine the health effects to on-site workers unless required by RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act)/CERCLA(Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation,and Liability Act)or the worker resides on-site. 12628-04 HRA Report URBAN Fv H Q S$R47i4{7 S 18 Pennington Industrial m 6w Source He a RiskAssessment EXHIBIT 2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS - . - � \� 016 . ` � & � 41 - � - / > `� ' ' ', • ' - � � � ■ � �A- % . • �. . , � � 2� « � � � 6Site - /$ . K dk J,Ax- \ � $ . r r jo , ■ ^ . , . .: . 7. . � _ - - SIP L � LE N w twDCcmivrAva,LakQeisinom _ rA-lr_ man_mmRm_, 32-C!ara0c--=• W ,mb Cceinir Ave,Lake rilsinciv Pmng 12z _ *_j GKI.Q_er�g.__rit-tg Arademy _rmm ga : _._.� ^ � m M2.a_.,_radun" ,ivs�p,pnmooEake _am&tail6_m_ �mPkFu_ dmill 495.,__Gali_m___ wG3qHRaReport C URBAN 19 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment TABLE 2-7: SUMMARY OF CANCER AND NON-CANCER RISKS Maximum Lifetime Significance Exceeds Time Period Location Cancer Risk Threshold Significance (Risk per (Risk per Threshold Million) Million) 30 Year Residential R1: 18570 Collier Avenue 0.53 10 NO Exposure 30 Year Residential R2: 18740 Collier Avenue 0.23 10 NO Exposure 25 Year Worker R3: Keith McCarthy Academy 0.28 10 NO Exposure 9 Year School R3: Keith McCarthy Academy 0.54 10 NO Child Exposure 25 Year Worker R4: Ortega High School/Lake Elsinore Head 0.04 10 NO Exposure Start Kindergarten 9 Year School R4: Ortega High School/Lake Elsinore Head 0.07 10 NO Child Exposure Start Kindergarten 25 Year Worker R5:Southern California Online Academy 0.10 10 NO Exposure 9 Year School R5:Southern California Online Academy 0.19 10 NO Child Exposure Maximum Exceeds Time Period Location Hazard Significance Significance Index Threshold Threshold Annual R1: 18570 Collier Avenue 0.0002 1.0 NO Average Annual R2: 18740 Collier Avenue 0.00008 1.0 NO Average Annual R3: Keith McCarthy Academy 0.00095 1.0 NO Average Annual R4: Ortega High School/Lake Elsinore Head 0.00013 1.0 NO Average Start Kindergarten Annual R5:Southern California Online Academy 0.00034 1.0 NO Average 12628-04 HRA Report URBAN �w Q 4ga��nn g 20 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment This page intentionally left blank 12628-04 HRA Report URBAN 21 �H�S$R47A�S 1 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment 3 REFERENCES 1. South Coast Air Quality Managment District. Mobile Source Toxics Analysis. [Online] 2003. http://www.agmd.gov/ceqa/handbook/mobile_toxic/mobile_toxic.html. 2. Goss,Tracy A and Kroeger,Amy. White Paper on Potential Control Strategies to Address Cumulative Impacts from Air Pollution. [Online] South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2003. [Cited:June 6, 2019.] http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/Agendas/Environmental-Justice/cumulative- impacts-working-group/cumulative-impacts-white-paper.pdf?sfvrsn=2. 3. Urban Crossoads, Inc. Pennington Industrial Project Focused Traffic Evaluation. 2019. 4. California Air Resources Board. EMFAC 2017. [Online] https://www.arb.ca.gov/emfac/2017/. 5. Air Resources Board.Air Quality and Land Use Handbook:A Community Health Perspective. 2005. 6. Wong,Jillian. Planning, Rule Development&Area Sources. December 22, 2016. 7. Environmental Protection Agency. User's Guide for the AMS/EPA Regulatory Model (AERMOD). [Online] 2019. https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/scram/models/aermod/aermod_userguide.pdf. 8. —. User's Guide for the AMS/EPA Regulatory Model (AERMOD). [Online] April 2018. https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/scram/models/aermod/aermod_userguide.pdf. 9. South Coast Air Quality Management District. South Coast AQMD Modeling Guidance for AERMOD. [Online] [Cited: September 18, 2019.] http://www.agmd.gov/home/air-quality/meteorological- data/modeling-guidance. 10. —. South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. [Online] April 2019. [Cited:June 6, 2019.] http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scagmd-air-quality-significance- thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. 11. National Safety Council. Injury Fact Chart. [Online] [Cited: September 18, 2019.] https://www.nsc.o rg/wo rk-safety/tools-resou rces/i nj u ry-facts/chart. 12628-04 HRA Report Ld�URBAN Swn}ga �nng 22 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment This page intentionally left blank 12628-04 HRA Report URBAN �H�S$R47A�S 23 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment 4 CERTIFICATION The contents of this health risk assessment represent an accurate depiction of the impacts to sensitive receptors associated with the proposed Pennington Industrial Project. The information contained in this health risk assessment report is based on the best available data at the time of preparation. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (949) 336-5987. Haseeb Qureshi Associate Principal URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. 260 E. Baker, Suite 200 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (949) 336-5987 hqureshi@urbanxroads.com EDUCATION Master of Science in Environmental Studies California State University, Fullerton • May, 2010 Bachelor of Arts in Environmental Analysis and Design University of California, Irvine • June, 2006 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS AEP—Association of Environmental Planners AWMA—Air and Waste Management Association ASTM —American Society for Testing and Materials PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Environmental Site Assessment—American Society for Testing and Materials • June 2013 Planned Communities and Urban Infill — Urban Land Institute • June 2011 Indoor Air Quality and Industrial Hygiene — EMSL Analytical • April 2008 Principles of Ambient Air Monitoring—California Air Resources Board • August 2007 AB2588 Regulatory Standards—Trinity Consultants • November 2006 Air Dispersion Modeling— Lakes Environmental • June 2006 12628-04 HRA Report Ld�URBAN Swn}}a snng 24 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment This page intentionally left blank 12628 04 HRA Report U RBAN Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment APPENDIX 2.1: AERMOD MODEL INPUT/OUTPUT 12628-04 HRA Report R� 4} � Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment This page intentionally left blank 12628 04 HRA Report U RBAN 12628 HRA ** **************************************** ** ** AERMOD Input Produced by: ** AERMOD View Ver. 9.8.3 ** Lakes Environmental Software Inc. ** Date: 3/14/2020 ** File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.ADI ** **************************************** ** ** **************************************** ** AERMOD Control Pathway **************************************** ** ** CO STARTING TITLEONE C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.isc MODELOPT DFAULT CONC AVERTIME ANNUAL URBANOPT 2189641 POLLUTID DPM RUNORNOT RUN ERRORFIL "12628 HRA.err" CO FINISHED ** **************************************** ** AERMOD Source Pathway **************************************** ** ** SO STARTING ** Source Location ** ** Source ID - Type - X Coord. - Y Coord. ** LOCATION AREA1 AREA 468977.340 3727028.790 388.000 ** DESCRSRC On-Site Idling Building 1 LOCATION AREA2 AREA 468994.630 3727091.030 388.000 ** DESCRSRC On-Site Idling Building 2 LOCATION AREA3 AREA 469037.210 3727057.750 388.180 ** DESCRSRC On-Site Idling Building 3 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINEI ** DESCRSRC On-Site Travel Building 1 ** PREFIX ** Length of Side = 8.59 ** Configuration = Adjacent Page 1 12628 HRA ** Emission Rate = 2.648E-06 ** Vertical Dimension = 6.99 ** SZINIT = 3.25 ** Nodes = 5 ** 468943.407, 3727103.785, 388.00, 3.49, 4.00 ** 468979.069, 3727071.798, 388.00, 3.49, 4.00 ** 468999.817, 3727046.943, 388.00, 3.49, 4.00 ** 468998.953, 3727042.836, 388.00, 3.49, 4.00 ** 469032.237, 3727014.091, 388.00, 3.49, 4.00 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000212 VOLUME 468946.605 3727100.917 388.00 LOCATION L0000213 VOLUME 468952.999 3727095.182 388.00 LOCATION L0000214 VOLUME 468959.394 3727089.446 388.00 LOCATION L0000215 VOLUME 468965.788 3727083.710 388.00 LOCATION L0000216 VOLUME 468972.183 3727077.974 388.00 LOCATION L0000217 VOLUME 468978.577 3727072.239 388.00 LOCATION L0000218 VOLUME 468984.150 3727065.710 388.00 LOCATION L0000219 VOLUME 468989.655 3727059.116 388.00 LOCATION L0000220 VOLUME 468995.160 3727052.522 388.00 LOCATION L0000221 VOLUME 468999.545 3727045.649 388.00 LOCATION L0000222 VOLUME 469003.279 3727039.100 388.00 LOCATION L0000223 VOLUME 469009.780 3727033.486 388.00 LOCATION L0000224 VOLUME 469016.281 3727027.871 388.00 LOCATION L0000225 VOLUME 469022.782 3727022.256 388.00 LOCATION L0000226 VOLUME 469029.283 3727016.642 388.00 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINEI ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE2 ** DESCRSRC On-Site Travel Building 2 ** PREFIX ** Length of Side = 8.59 ** Configuration = Adjacent ** Emission Rate = 1.659E-06 ** Vertical Dimension = 6.99 ** SZINIT = 3.25 ** Nodes = 5 ** 469065.953, 3727110.053, 389.00, 3.49, 4.00 ** 469038.721, 3727080.659, 388.48, 3.49, 4.00 ** 469021.647, 3727061.423, 388.05, 3.49, 4.00 ** 469016.027, 3727056.236, 388.00, 3.49, 4.00 ** 469003.059, 3727070.717, 388.00, 3.49, 4.00 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000227 VOLUME 469063.034 3727106.902 389.00 LOCATION L0000228 VOLUME 469057.196 3727100.601 389.00 LOCATION L0000229 VOLUME 469051.358 3727094.300 388.98 LOCATION L0000230 VOLUME 469045.520 3727087.998 388.87 LOCATION L0000231 VOLUME 469039.682 3727081.697 388.68 Page 2 12628 HRA LOCATION L0000232 VOLUME 469033.958 3727075.293 388.41 LOCATION L0000233 VOLUME 469028.255 3727068.869 388.09 LOCATION L0000234 VOLUME 469022.553 3727062.445 388.00 LOCATION L0000235 VOLUME 469016.338 3727056.523 388.00 LOCATION L0000236 VOLUME 469010.579 3727062.320 388.00 LOCATION L0000237 VOLUME 469004.848 3727068.720 388.02 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE2 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE3 ** DESCRSRC On-Site Travel Building 3 ** PREFIX ** Length of Side = 8.59 ** Configuration = Adjacent ** Emission Rate = 1.087E-06 ** Vertical Dimension = 6.99 ** SZINIT = 3.25 ** Nodes = 3 ** 469062.927, 3727107.892, 389.00, 3.49, 4.00 ** 469016.892, 3727056.885, 388.00, 3.49, 4.00 ** 469039.801, 3727028.139, 388.00, 3.49, 4.00 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000238 VOLUME 469060.050 3727104.703 389.00 LOCATION L0000239 VOLUME 469054.294 3727098.326 389.00 LOCATION L0000240 VOLUME 469048.539 3727091.949 388.95 LOCATION L0000241 VOLUME 469042.784 3727085.573 388.80 LOCATION L0000242 VOLUME 469037.028 3727079.196 388.58 LOCATION L0000243 VOLUME 469031.273 3727072.819 388.27 LOCATION L0000244 VOLUME 469025.518 3727066.442 388.01 LOCATION L0000245 VOLUME 469019.762 3727060.065 388.00 LOCATION L0000246 VOLUME 469019.575 3727053.518 388.00 LOCATION L0000247 VOLUME 469024.929 3727046.800 388.00 LOCATION L0000248 VOLUME 469030.283 3727040.083 388.00 LOCATION L0000249 VOLUME 469035.637 3727033.365 388.00 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE3 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE4 ** DESCRSRC Off-Site Travel 10% ** PREFIX ** Length of Side = 8.59 ** Configuration = Adjacent ** Emission Rate = 4.163E-07 ** Vertical Dimension = 6.99 ** SZINIT = 3.25 ** Nodes = 2 ** 468928.573, 3727113.317, 387.94, 3.49, 4.00 ** 468790.226, 3726953.049, 386.00, 3.49, 4.00 Page 3 12628 HRA ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000250 VOLUME 468925.766 3727110.066 388.00 LOCATION L0000251 VOLUME 468920.153 3727103.563 388.00 LOCATION L0000252 VOLUME 468914.540 3727097.061 388.00 LOCATION L0000253 VOLUME 468908.927 3727090.558 387.80 LOCATION L0000254 VOLUME 468903.314 3727084.056 387.47 LOCATION L0000255 VOLUME 468897.701 3727077.554 387.23 LOCATION L0000256 VOLUME 468892.088 3727071.051 387.07 LOCATION L0000257 VOLUME 468886.475 3727064.549 387.00 LOCATION L0000258 VOLUME 468880.862 3727058.046 387.00 LOCATION L0000259 VOLUME 468875.249 3727051.544 387.00 LOCATION L0000260 VOLUME 468869.636 3727045.041 387.00 LOCATION L0000261 VOLUME 468864.023 3727038.539 387.00 LOCATION L0000262 VOLUME 468858.410 3727032.036 387.00 LOCATION L0000263 VOLUME 468852.797 3727025.534 387.00 LOCATION L0000264 VOLUME 468847.184 3727019.032 386.92 LOCATION L0000265 VOLUME 468841.570 3727012.529 386.73 LOCATION L0000266 VOLUME 468835.957 3727006.027 386.54 LOCATION L0000267 VOLUME 468830.344 3726999.524 386.28 LOCATION L0000268 VOLUME 468824.731 3726993.022 386.10 LOCATION L0000269 VOLUME 468819.118 3726986.519 386.00 LOCATION L0000270 VOLUME 468813.505 3726980.017 386.00 LOCATION L0000271 VOLUME 468807.892 3726973.514 386.00 LOCATION L0000272 VOLUME 468802.279 3726967.012 386.00 LOCATION L0000273 VOLUME 468796.666 3726960.510 386.00 LOCATION L0000274 VOLUME 468791.053 3726954.007 386.00 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE4 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE5 ** DESCRSRC Off-Site Travel 40% ** PREFIX ** Length of Side = 8.59 ** Configuration = Adjacent ** Emission Rate = 7.591E-07 ** Vertical Dimension = 6.99 ** SZINIT = 3.25 ** Nodes = 2 ** 468931.983, 3727117.701, 388.00, 3.49, 4.00 ** 469002.617, 3727183.465, 389.03, 3.49, 4.00 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000275 VOLUME 468935.126 3727120.628 388.00 LOCATION L0000276 VOLUME 468941.413 3727126.481 388.00 LOCATION L0000277 VOLUME 468947.700 3727132.335 388.00 LOCATION L0000278 VOLUME 468953.987 3727138.188 388.00 LOCATION L0000279 VOLUME 468960.274 3727144.041 388.00 LOCATION L0000280 VOLUME 468966.561 3727149.895 388.00 LOCATION L0000281 VOLUME 468972.848 3727155.748 388.11 Page 4 12628 HRA LOCATION L0000282 VOLUME 468979.135 3727161.602 388.44 LOCATION L0000283 VOLUME 468985.422 3727167.455 388.71 LOCATION L0000284 VOLUME 468991.709 3727173.308 388.89 LOCATION L0000285 VOLUME 468997.996 3727179.162 388.99 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE5 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE6 ** DESCRSRC Off-Site Travel 20% ** PREFIX ** Length of Side = 8.59 ** Configuration = Adjacent ** Emission Rate = 3.728E-07 ** Vertical Dimension = 6.99 ** SZINIT = 3.25 ** Nodes = 2 ** 469069.842, 3727115.265, 389.00, 3.49, 4.00 ** 469005.540, 3727184.926, 389.05, 3.49, 4.00 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000286 VOLUME 469066.929 3727118.421 389.00 LOCATION L0000287 VOLUME 469061.103 3727124.733 389.00 LOCATION L0000288 VOLUME 469055.276 3727131.045 389.17 LOCATION L0000289 VOLUME 469049.450 3727137.357 389.38 LOCATION L0000290 VOLUME 469043.623 3727143.669 389.59 LOCATION L0000291 VOLUME 469037.797 3727149.981 389.80 LOCATION L0000292 VOLUME 469031.970 3727156.293 390.00 LOCATION L0000293 VOLUME 469026.144 3727162.605 389.88 LOCATION L0000294 VOLUME 469020.318 3727168.917 389.69 LOCATION L0000295 VOLUME 469014.491 3727175.229 389.49 LOCATION L0000296 VOLUME 469008.665 3727181.541 389.30 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE6 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE7 ** DESCRSRC Off-Site Travel 30% ** PREFIX ** Length of Side = 8.59 ** Configuration = Adjacent ** Emission Rate = 1.482E-06 ** Vertical Dimension = 6.99 ** SZINIT = 3.25 ** Nodes = 2 ** 469068.868, 3727118.675, 389.00, 3.49, 4.00 ** 469256.415, 3726951.588, 388.88, 3.49, 4.00 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000297 VOLUME 469072.075 3727115.818 389.00 LOCATION L0000298 VOLUME 469078.489 3727110.104 389.00 LOCATION L0000299 VOLUME 469084.902 3727104.390 389.00 Page 5 12628 HRA LOCATION L0000300 VOLUME 469091.316 3727098.676 389.00 LOCATION L0000301 VOLUME 469097.730 3727092.962 389.00 LOCATION L0000302 VOLUME 469104.144 3727087.248 389.00 LOCATION L0000303 VOLUME 469110.558 3727081.534 389.00 LOCATION L0000304 VOLUME 469116.971 3727075.820 389.00 LOCATION L0000305 VOLUME 469123.385 3727070.105 389.02 LOCATION L0000306 VOLUME 469129.799 3727064.391 389.00 LOCATION L0000307 VOLUME 469136.213 3727058.677 389.00 LOCATION L0000308 VOLUME 469142.627 3727052.963 389.00 LOCATION L0000309 VOLUME 469149.041 3727047.249 389.00 LOCATION L0000310 VOLUME 469155.454 3727041.535 389.04 LOCATION L0000311 VOLUME 469161.868 3727035.821 389.00 LOCATION L0000312 VOLUME 469168.282 3727030.107 388.93 LOCATION L0000313 VOLUME 469174.696 3727024.392 388.94 LOCATION L0000314 VOLUME 469181.110 3727018.678 389.02 LOCATION L0000315 VOLUME 469187.523 3727012.964 389.06 LOCATION L0000316 VOLUME 469193.937 3727007.250 389.02 LOCATION L0000317 VOLUME 469200.351 3727001.536 388.85 LOCATION L0000318 VOLUME 469206.765 3726995.822 388.66 LOCATION L0000319 VOLUME 469213.179 3726990.108 388.59 LOCATION L0000320 VOLUME 469219.592 3726984.394 388.61 LOCATION L0000321 VOLUME 469226.006 3726978.679 388.63 LOCATION L0000322 VOLUME 469232.420 3726972.965 388.76 LOCATION L0000323 VOLUME 469238.834 3726967.251 388.97 LOCATION L0000324 VOLUME 469245.248 3726961.537 389.10 LOCATION L0000325 VOLUME 469251.661 3726955.823 389.13 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE7 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE8 ** DESCRSRC Off-Site Travel 10% ** PREFIX ** Length of Side = 8.59 ** Configuration = Adjacent ** Emission Rate = 3.793E-07 ** Vertical Dimension = 6.99 ** SZINIT = 3.25 ** Nodes = 2 ** 468998.720, 3727189.797, 389.01, 3.49, 4.00 ** 468859.399, 3727323.273, 387.59, 3.49, 4.00 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000326 VOLUME 468995.619 3727192.769 389.00 LOCATION L0000327 VOLUME 468989.416 3727198.711 389.00 LOCATION L0000328 VOLUME 468983.213 3727204.654 389.00 LOCATION L0000329 VOLUME 468977.011 3727210.596 389.00 LOCATION L0000330 VOLUME 468970.808 3727216.539 389.00 LOCATION L0000331 VOLUME 468964.605 3727222.481 388.83 LOCATION L0000332 VOLUME 468958.402 3727228.424 388.62 Page 6 12628 HRA LOCATION L0000333 VOLUME 468952.199 3727234.366 388.42 LOCATION L0000334 VOLUME 468945.997 3727240.309 388.21 LOCATION L0000335 VOLUME 468939.794 3727246.251 388.00 LOCATION L0000336 VOLUME 468933.591 3727252.194 388.00 LOCATION L0000337 VOLUME 468927.388 3727258.136 388.00 LOCATION L0000338 VOLUME 468921.186 3727264.079 388.00 LOCATION L0000339 VOLUME 468914.983 3727270.021 388.00 LOCATION L0000340 VOLUME 468908.780 3727275.964 388.00 LOCATION L0000341 VOLUME 468902.577 3727281.906 388.00 LOCATION L0000342 VOLUME 468896.374 3727287.849 388.00 LOCATION L0000343 VOLUME 468890.172 3727293.791 388.00 LOCATION L0000344 VOLUME 468883.969 3727299.734 388.00 LOCATION L0000345 VOLUME 468877.766 3727305.677 387.94 LOCATION L0000346 VOLUME 468871.563 3727311.619 387.78 LOCATION L0000347 VOLUME 468865.361 3727317.562 387.71 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE8 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE9 ** DESCRSRC Off-Site Travel 50% ** PREFIX ** Length of Side = 8.59 ** Configuration = Adjacent ** Emission Rate = 5.62E-06 ** Vertical Dimension = 6.99 ** SZINIT = 3.25 ** Nodes = 3 ** 469002.617, 3727190.284, 389.02, 3.49, 4.00 ** 469115.146, 3727303.300, 391.03, 3.49, 4.00 ** 468812.958, 3727583.480, 388.93, 3.49, 4.00 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000348 VOLUME 469005.648 3727193.328 389.20 LOCATION L0000349 VOLUME 469011.709 3727199.415 389.40 LOCATION L0000350 VOLUME 469017.770 3727205.502 389.60 LOCATION L0000351 VOLUME 469023.831 3727211.589 389.80 LOCATION L0000352 VOLUME 469029.892 3727217.677 390.00 LOCATION L0000353 VOLUME 469035.952 3727223.764 390.00 LOCATION L0000354 VOLUME 469042.013 3727229.851 390.00 LOCATION L0000355 VOLUME 469048.074 3727235.938 390.00 LOCATION L0000356 VOLUME 469054.135 3727242.025 390.00 LOCATION L0000357 VOLUME 469060.196 3727248.112 390.00 LOCATION L0000358 VOLUME 469066.257 3727254.200 390.00 LOCATION L0000359 VOLUME 469072.318 3727260.287 390.00 LOCATION L0000360 VOLUME 469078.379 3727266.374 390.00 LOCATION L0000361 VOLUME 469084.440 3727272.461 390.00 LOCATION L0000362 VOLUME 469090.501 3727278.548 390.11 LOCATION L0000363 VOLUME 469096.562 3727284.635 390.45 LOCATION L0000364 VOLUME 469102.623 3727290.722 390.71 Page 7 12628 HRA LOCATION L0000365 VOLUME 469108.683 3727296.810 390.89 LOCATION L0000366 VOLUME 469114.744 3727302.897 390.98 LOCATION L0000367 VOLUME 469109.264 3727308.753 390.97 LOCATION L0000368 VOLUME 469102.965 3727314.594 390.84 LOCATION L0000369 VOLUME 469096.666 3727320.434 390.63 LOCATION L0000370 VOLUME 469090.367 3727326.274 390.34 LOCATION L0000371 VOLUME 469084.068 3727332.115 390.10 LOCATION L0000372 VOLUME 469077.769 3727337.955 390.00 LOCATION L0000373 VOLUME 469071.469 3727343.795 390.00 LOCATION L0000374 VOLUME 469065.170 3727349.636 390.00 LOCATION L0000375 VOLUME 469058.871 3727355.476 390.00 LOCATION L0000376 VOLUME 469052.572 3727361.316 390.00 LOCATION L0000377 VOLUME 469046.273 3727367.157 390.00 LOCATION L0000378 VOLUME 469039.974 3727372.997 390.00 LOCATION L0000379 VOLUME 469033.675 3727378.837 390.00 LOCATION L0000380 VOLUME 469027.376 3727384.678 390.00 LOCATION L0000381 VOLUME 469021.077 3727390.518 390.00 LOCATION L0000382 VOLUME 469014.778 3727396.359 390.02 LOCATION L0000383 VOLUME 469008.479 3727402.199 390.35 LOCATION L0000384 VOLUME 469002.179 3727408.039 390.77 LOCATION L0000385 VOLUME 468995.880 3727413.880 391.12 LOCATION L0000386 VOLUME 468989.581 3727419.720 391.32 LOCATION L0000387 VOLUME 468983.282 3727425.560 391.43 LOCATION L0000388 VOLUME 468976.983 3727431.401 391.24 LOCATION L0000389 VOLUME 468970.684 3727437.241 391.03 LOCATION L0000390 VOLUME 468964.385 3727443.081 390.82 LOCATION L0000391 VOLUME 468958.086 3727448.922 390.61 LOCATION L0000392 VOLUME 468951.787 3727454.762 390.40 LOCATION L0000393 VOLUME 468945.488 3727460.602 390.35 LOCATION L0000394 VOLUME 468939.189 3727466.443 390.35 LOCATION L0000395 VOLUME 468932.889 3727472.283 390.54 LOCATION L0000396 VOLUME 468926.590 3727478.123 390.74 LOCATION L0000397 VOLUME 468920.291 3727483.964 390.93 LOCATION L0000398 VOLUME 468913.992 3727489.804 391.02 LOCATION L0000399 VOLUME 468907.693 3727495.644 390.93 LOCATION L0000400 VOLUME 468901.394 3727501.485 390.72 LOCATION L0000401 VOLUME 468895.095 3727507.325 390.51 LOCATION L0000402 VOLUME 468888.796 3727513.165 390.30 LOCATION L0000403 VOLUME 468882.497 3727519.006 390.09 LOCATION L0000404 VOLUME 468876.198 3727524.846 390.00 LOCATION L0000405 VOLUME 468869.899 3727530.686 390.00 LOCATION L0000406 VOLUME 468863.599 3727536.527 390.00 LOCATION L0000407 VOLUME 468857.300 3727542.367 390.00 LOCATION L0000408 VOLUME 468851.001 3727548.207 390.00 LOCATION L0000409 VOLUME 468844.702 3727554.048 389.83 LOCATION L0000410 VOLUME 468838.403 3727559.888 389.62 LOCATION L0000411 VOLUME 468832.104 3727565.728 389.41 LOCATION L0000412 VOLUME 468825.805 3727571.569 389.20 Page 8 12628 HRA LOCATION L0000413 VOLUME 468819.506 3727577.409 388.99 LOCATION L0000414 VOLUME 468813.207 3727583.249 388.78 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE9 ** Source Parameters ** SRCPARAM AREA1 2.9348E-08 4.110 14.091 16.796 41.269 SRCPARAM AREA2 2.7437E-08 4.110 12.075 18.171 135.725 SRCPARAM AREA3 2.0802E-08 4.110 9.800 17.036 131.424 ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINEI SRCPARAM L0000212 0.0000001765 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000213 0.0000001765 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000214 0.0000001765 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000215 0.0000001765 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000216 0.0000001765 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000217 0.0000001765 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000218 0.0000001765 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000219 0.0000001765 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000220 0.0000001765 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000221 0.0000001765 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000222 0.0000001765 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000223 0.0000001765 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000224 0.0000001765 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000225 0.0000001765 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000226 0.0000001765 3.49 4.00 3.25 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE2 SRCPARAM L0000227 0.0000001508 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000228 0.0000001508 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000229 0.0000001508 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000230 0.0000001508 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000231 0.0000001508 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000232 0.0000001508 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000233 0.0000001508 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000234 0.0000001508 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000235 0.0000001508 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000236 0.0000001508 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000237 0.0000001508 3.49 4.00 3.25 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE3 SRCPARAM L0000238 0.00000009058 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000239 0.00000009058 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000240 0.00000009058 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000241 0.00000009058 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000242 0.00000009058 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000243 0.00000009058 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000244 0.00000009058 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000245 0.00000009058 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000246 0.00000009058 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000247 0.00000009058 3.49 4.00 3.25 Page 9 12628 HRA SRCPARAM L0000248 0.00000009058 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000249 0.00000009058 3.49 4.00 3.25 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE4 SRCPARAM L0000250 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000251 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000252 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000253 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000254 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000255 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000256 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000257 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000258 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000259 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000260 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000261 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000262 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000263 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000264 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000265 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000266 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000267 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000268 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000269 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000270 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000271 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000272 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000273 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000274 0.00000001665 3.49 4.00 3.25 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE5 SRCPARAM L0000275 0.00000006901 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000276 0.00000006901 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000277 0.00000006901 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000278 0.00000006901 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000279 0.00000006901 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000280 0.00000006901 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000281 0.00000006901 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000282 0.00000006901 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000283 0.00000006901 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000284 0.00000006901 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000285 0.00000006901 3.49 4.00 3.25 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE6 SRCPARAM L0000286 0.00000003389 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000287 0.00000003389 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000288 0.00000003389 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000289 0.00000003389 3.49 4.00 3.25 Page 10 12628 HRA SRCPARAM L0000290 0.00000003389 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000291 0.00000003389 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000292 0.00000003389 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000293 0.00000003389 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000294 0.00000003389 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000295 0.00000003389 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000296 0.00000003389 3.49 4.00 3.25 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE7 SRCPARAM L0000297 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000298 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000299 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000300 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000301 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000302 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000303 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000304 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000305 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000306 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000307 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000308 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000309 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000310 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000311 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000312 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000313 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000314 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000315 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000316 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000317 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000318 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000319 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000320 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000321 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000322 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000323 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000324 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000325 0.0000000511 3.49 4.00 3.25 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE8 SRCPARAM L0000326 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000327 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000328 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000329 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000330 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000331 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000332 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000333 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 Page 11 12628 HRA SRCPARAM L0000334 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000335 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000336 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000337 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000338 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000339 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000340 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000341 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000342 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000343 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000344 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000345 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000346 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000347 0.00000001724 3.49 4.00 3.25 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE9 SRCPARAM L0000348 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000349 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000350 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000351 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000352 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000353 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000354 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000355 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000356 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000357 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000358 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000359 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000360 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000361 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000362 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000363 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000364 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000365 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000366 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000367 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000368 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000369 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000370 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000371 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000372 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000373 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000374 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000375 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000376 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000377 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000378 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000379 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 Page 12 12628 HRA SRCPARAM L0000380 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000381 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000382 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000383 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000384 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000385 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000386 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000387 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000388 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000389 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000390 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000391 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000392 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000393 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000394 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000395 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000396 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000397 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000398 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000399 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000400 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000401 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000402 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000403 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000404 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000405 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000406 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000407 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000408 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000409 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000410 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000411 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000412 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000413 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 SRCPARAM L0000414 0.00000008388 3.49 4.00 3.25 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- URBANSRC ALL SRCGROUP ALL SO FINISHED ** **************************************** ** AERMOD Receptor Pathway **************************************** ** ** RE STARTING INCLUDED "12628 HRA.rou" RE FINISHED Page 13 12628 HRA ** **************************************** ** AERMOD Meteorology Pathway **************************************** ** ** ME STARTING SURFFILE LakeElsinoreAD3U\ELSI_V9_ADJU\ELSI_v9.SFC PROFFILE LakeElsinoreADJU\ELSI_V9_ADJU\ELSI_v9.PFL SURFDATA 3171 2012 UAIRDATA 3190 2012 SITEDATA 99999 2012 PROFBASE 406.0 METERS ME FINISHED ** **************************************** ** AERMOD Output Pathway **************************************** ** ** OU STARTING ** Auto-Generated Plotfiles PLOTFILE ANNUAL ALL "12628 HRA.AD\AN00GALL.PLT" 31 SUMMFILE "12628 HRA.sum" OU FINISHED *** Message Summary For AERMOD Model Setup *** --------- Summary of Total Messages -------- A Total of 0 Fatal Error Message(s) A Total of 2 Warning Message(s) A Total of 0 Informational Message(s) ******** FATAL ERROR MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** ME W186 638 MEOPEN: THRESH_1MIN 1-min ASOS wind speed threshold used 0.50 ME W187 638 MEOPEN: ADJ_U* Option for Stable Low Winds used in AERMET *********************************** *** SETUP Finishes Successfully *** Page 14 12628 HRA *********************************** T *** AERMOD - VERSION 19191 *** *** C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.isc *** 03/14/20 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 *** *** *** 11:38:01 PAGE 1 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U* *** MODEL SETUP OPTIONS SUMMARY *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - **Model Is Setup For Calculation of Average CONCentration Values. -- DEPOSITION LOGIC -- **NO GAS DEPOSITION Data Provided. **NO PARTICLE DEPOSITION Data Provided. **Model Uses NO DRY DEPLETION. DRYDPLT = F **Model Uses NO WET DEPLETION. WETDPLT = F **Model Uses URBAN Dispersion Algorithm for the SBL for 206 Source(s), for Total of 1 Urban Area(s) : Urban Population = 2189641.0 ; Urban Roughness Length = 1.000 m **Model Uses Regulatory DEFAULT Options: 1. Stack-tip Downwash. 2. Model Accounts for ELEVated Terrain Effects. 3. Use Calms Processing Routine. 4. Use Missing Data Processing Routine. 5. No Exponential Decay. 6. Urban Roughness Length of 1.0 Meter Assumed. **Other Options Specified: ADJ_U* - Use ADJ_U* option for SBL in AERMET CCVR_Sub - Meteorological data includes CCVR substitutions TEMP—Sub - Meteorological data includes TEMP substitutions **Model Assumes No FLAGPOLE Receptor Heights. **The User Specified a Pollutant Type of: DPM **Model Calculates ANNUAL Averages Only **This Run Includes: 206 Source(s); 1 Source Group(s); and 5 Receptor(s) Page 15 12628 HRA with: 0 POINT(s), including 0 POINTCAP(s) and 0 POINTHOR(s) and: 203 VOLUME source(s) and: 3 AREA type source(s) and: 0 LINE source(s) and: 0 RLINE/RLINEXT source(s) and: 0 OPENPIT source(s) and: 0 BUOYANT LINE source(s) with 0 line(s) **Model Set To Continue RUNning After the Setup Testing. **The AERMET Input Meteorological Data Version Date: 16216 **Output Options Selected: Model Outputs Tables of ANNUAL Averages by Receptor Model Outputs External File(s) of High Values for Plotting (PLOTFILE Keyword) Model Outputs Separate Summary File of High Ranked Values (SUMMFILE Keyword) **NOTE: The Following Flags May Appear Following CONC Values: c for Calm Hours m for Missing Hours b for Both Calm and Missing Hours "Misc. Inputs: Base Elev. for Pot. Temp. Profile (m MSL) = 406.00 ; Decay Coef. = 0.000 Rot. Angle = 0.0 Emission Units = GRAMS/SEC ; Emission Rate Unit Factor = 0.10000E+07 Output Units = MICROGRAMS/M**3 **Approximate Storage Requirements of Model = 3.6 MB of RAM. **Input Runstream File: aermod.inp **Output Print File: aermod.out **Detailed Error/Message File: 12628 HRA.err **File for Summary of Results: 12628 HRA.sum T *** AERMOD - VERSION 19191 *** *** C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.isc *** 03/14/20 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 *** *** Page 16 12628 HRA *** 11:38:01 PAGE 2 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U* *** VOLUME SOURCE DATA *** NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT. URBAN EMISSION RATE SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ SOURCE SCALAR VARY ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) BY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L0000212 0 0.17650E-06 468946.6 3727100.9 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000213 0 0.17650E-06 468953.0 3727095.2 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000214 0 0.17650E-06 468959.4 3727089.4 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000215 0 0.17650E-06 468965.8 3727083.7 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000216 0 0.17650E-06 468972.2 3727078.0 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000217 0 0.17650E-06 468978.6 3727072.2 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000218 0 0.17650E-06 468984.1 3727065.7 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000219 0 0.17650E-06 468989.7 3727059.1 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000220 0 0.17650E-06 468995.2 3727052.5 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000221 0 0.17650E-06 468999.5 3727045.6 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000222 0 0.17650E-06 469003.3 3727039.1 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000223 0 0.17650E-06 469009.8 3727033.5 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000224 0 0.17650E-06 469016.3 3727027.9 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000225 0 0.17650E-06 469022.8 3727022.3 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000226 0 0.17650E-06 469029.3 3727016.6 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000227 0 0.15080E-06 469063.0 3727106.9 389.0 3.49 4.00 Page 17 12628 HRA 3.25 YES L0000228 0 0.15080E-06 469057.2 3727100.6 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000229 0 0.15080E-06 469051.4 3727094.3 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000230 0 0.15080E-06 469045.5 3727088.0 388.9 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000231 0 0.15080E-06 469039.7 3727081.7 388.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000232 0 0.15080E-06 469034.0 3727075.3 388.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000233 0 0.15080E-06 469028.3 3727068.9 388.1 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000234 0 0.15080E-06 469022.6 3727062.4 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000235 0 0.15080E-06 469016.3 3727056.5 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000236 0 0.15080E-06 469010.6 3727062.3 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000237 0 0.15080E-06 469004.8 3727068.7 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000238 0 0.90580E-07 469060.0 3727104.7 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000239 0 0.90580E-07 469054.3 3727098.3 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000240 0 0.90580E-07 469048.5 3727091.9 388.9 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000241 0 0.90580E-07 469042.8 3727085.6 388.8 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000242 0 0.90580E-07 469037.0 3727079.2 388.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000243 0 0.90580E-07 469031.3 3727072.8 388.3 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000244 0 0.90580E-07 469025.5 3727066.4 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000245 0 0.90580E-07 469019.8 3727060.1 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000246 0 0.90580E-07 469019.6 3727053.5 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000247 0 0.90580E-07 469024.9 3727046.8 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000248 0 0.90580E-07 469030.3 3727040.1 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000249 0 0.90580E-07 469035.6 3727033.4 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000250 0 0.16650E-07 468925.8 3727110.1 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000251 0 0.16650E-07 468920.2 3727103.6 388.0 3.49 4.00 Page 18 12628 HRA 3.25 YES T *** AERMOD - VERSION 19191 *** *** C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.isc *** 03/14/20 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 *** *** *** 11:38:01 PAGE 3 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONK ELEV URBAN ADJ_U* *** VOLUME SOURCE DATA *** NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT. URBAN EMISSION RATE SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ SOURCE SCALAR VARY ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) BY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L0000252 0 0.16650E-07 468914.5 3727097.1 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000253 0 0.16650E-07 468908.9 3727090.6 387.8 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000254 0 0.16650E-07 468903.3 3727084.1 387.5 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000255 0 0.16650E-07 468897.7 3727077.6 387.2 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000256 0 0.16650E-07 468892.1 3727071.1 387.1 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000257 0 0.16650E-07 468886.5 3727064.5 387.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000258 0 0.16650E-07 468880.9 3727058.0 387.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000259 0 0.16650E-07 468875.2 3727051.5 387.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000260 0 0.16650E-07 468869.6 3727045.0 387.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000261 0 0.16650E-07 468864.0 3727038.5 387.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000262 0 0.16650E-07 468858.4 3727032.0 387.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000263 0 0.16650E-07 468852.8 3727025.5 387.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000264 0 0.16650E-07 468847.2 3727019.0 386.9 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000265 0 0.16650E-07 468841.6 3727012.5 386.7 3.49 4.00 Page 19 12628 HRA 3.25 YES L0000266 0 0.16650E-07 468836.0 3727006.0 386.5 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000267 0 0.16650E-07 468830.3 3726999.5 386.3 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000268 0 0.16650E-07 468824.7 3726993.0 386.1 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000269 0 0.16650E-07 468819.1 3726986.5 386.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000270 0 0.16650E-07 468813.5 3726980.0 386.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000271 0 0.16650E-07 468807.9 3726973.5 386.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000272 0 0.16650E-07 468802.3 3726967.0 386.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000273 0 0.16650E-07 468796.7 3726960.5 386.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000274 0 0.16650E-07 468791.1 3726954.0 386.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000275 0 0.69010E-07 468935.1 3727120.6 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000276 0 0.69010E-07 468941.4 3727126.5 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000277 0 0.69010E-07 468947.7 3727132.3 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000278 0 0.69010E-07 468954.0 3727138.2 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000279 0 0.69010E-07 468960.3 3727144.0 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000280 0 0.69010E-07 468966.6 3727149.9 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000281 0 0.69010E-07 468972.8 3727155.7 388.1 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000282 0 0.69010E-07 468979.1 3727161.6 388.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000283 0 0.69010E-07 468985.4 3727167.5 388.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000284 0 0.69010E-07 468991.7 3727173.3 388.9 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000285 0 0.69010E-07 468998.0 3727179.2 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000286 0 0.33890E-07 469066.9 3727118.4 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000287 0 0.33890E-07 469061.1 3727124.7 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000288 0 0.33890E-07 469055.3 3727131.0 389.2 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000289 0 0.33890E-07 469049.5 3727137.4 389.4 3.49 4.00 Page 20 12628 HRA 3.25 YES L0000290 0 0.33890E-07 469043.6 3727143.7 389.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000291 0 0.33890E-07 469037.8 3727150.0 389.8 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES T *** AERMOD - VERSION 19191 *** *** C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.isc *** 03/14/20 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 *** *** *** 11:38:01 PAGE 4 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONK ELEV URBAN ADJ_U* *** VOLUME SOURCE DATA *** NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT. URBAN EMISSION RATE SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ SOURCE SCALAR VARY ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) BY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L0000292 0 0.33890E-07 469032.0 3727156.3 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000293 0 0.33890E-07 469026.1 3727162.6 389.9 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000294 0 0.33890E-07 469020.3 3727168.9 389.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000295 0 0.33890E-07 469014.5 3727175.2 389.5 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000296 0 0.33890E-07 469008.7 3727181.5 389.3 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000297 0 0.51100E-07 469072.1 3727115.8 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000298 0 0.51100E-07 469078.5 3727110.1 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000299 0 0.51100E-07 469084.9 3727104.4 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000300 0 0.51100E-07 469091.3 3727098.7 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000301 0 0.51100E-07 469097.7 3727093.0 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000302 0 0.51100E-07 469104.1 3727087.2 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000303 0 0.51100E-07 469110.6 3727081.5 389.0 3.49 4.00 Page 21 12628 HRA 3.25 YES L0000304 0 0.51100E-07 469117.0 3727075.8 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000305 0 0.51100E-07 469123.4 3727070.1 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000306 0 0.51100E-07 469129.8 3727064.4 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000307 0 0.51100E-07 469136.2 3727058.7 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000308 0 0.51100E-07 469142.6 3727053.0 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000309 0 0.51100E-07 469149.0 3727047.2 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000310 0 0.51100E-07 469155.5 3727041.5 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000311 0 0.51100E-07 469161.9 3727035.8 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000312 0 0.51100E-07 469168.3 3727030.1 388.9 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000313 0 0.51100E-07 469174.7 3727024.4 388.9 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000314 0 0.51100E-07 469181.1 3727018.7 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000315 0 0.51100E-07 469187.5 3727013.0 389.1 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000316 0 0.51100E-07 469193.9 3727007.2 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000317 0 0.51100E-07 469200.4 3727001.5 388.9 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000318 0 0.51100E-07 469206.8 3726995.8 388.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000319 0 0.51100E-07 469213.2 3726990.1 388.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000320 0 0.51100E-07 469219.6 3726984.4 388.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000321 0 0.51100E-07 469226.0 3726978.7 388.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000322 0 0.51100E-07 469232.4 3726973.0 388.8 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000323 0 0.51100E-07 469238.8 3726967.3 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000324 0 0.51100E-07 469245.2 3726961.5 389.1 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000325 0 0.51100E-07 469251.7 3726955.8 389.1 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000326 0 0.17240E-07 468995.6 3727192.8 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000327 0 0.17240E-07 468989.4 3727198.7 389.0 3.49 4.00 Page 22 12628 HRA 3.25 YES L0000328 0 0.17240E-07 468983.2 3727204.7 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000329 0 0.17240E-07 468977.0 3727210.6 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000330 0 0.17240E-07 468970.8 3727216.5 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000331 0 0.17240E-07 468964.6 3727222.5 388.8 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES T *** AERMOD - VERSION 19191 *** *** C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.isc *** 03/14/20 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 *** *** *** 11:38:01 PAGE 5 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONK ELEV URBAN ADJ_U* *** VOLUME SOURCE DATA *** NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT. URBAN EMISSION RATE SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ SOURCE SCALAR VARY ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) BY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L0000332 0 0.17240E-07 468958.4 3727228.4 388.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000333 0 0.17240E-07 468952.2 3727234.4 388.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000334 0 0.17240E-07 468946.0 3727240.3 388.2 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000335 0 0.17240E-07 468939.8 3727246.3 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000336 0 0.17240E-07 468933.6 3727252.2 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000337 0 0.17240E-07 468927.4 3727258.1 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000338 0 0.17240E-07 468921.2 3727264.1 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000339 0 0.17240E-07 468915.0 3727270.0 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000340 0 0.17240E-07 468908.8 3727276.0 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000341 0 0.17240E-07 468902.6 3727281.9 388.0 3.49 4.00 Page 23 12628 HRA 3.25 YES L0000342 0 0.17240E-07 468896.4 3727287.8 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000343 0 0.17240E-07 468890.2 3727293.8 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000344 0 0.17240E-07 468884.0 3727299.7 388.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000345 0 0.17240E-07 468877.8 3727305.7 387.9 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000346 0 0.17240E-07 468871.6 3727311.6 387.8 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000347 0 0.17240E-07 468865.4 3727317.6 387.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000348 0 0.83880E-07 469005.6 3727193.3 389.2 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000349 0 0.83880E-07 469011.7 3727199.4 389.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000350 0 0.83880E-07 469017.8 3727205.5 389.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000351 0 0.83880E-07 469023.8 3727211.6 389.8 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000352 0 0.83880E-07 469029.9 3727217.7 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000353 0 0.83880E-07 469036.0 3727223.8 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000354 0 0.83880E-07 469042.0 3727229.9 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000355 0 0.83880E-07 469048.1 3727235.9 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000356 0 0.83880E-07 469054.1 3727242.0 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000357 0 0.83880E-07 469060.2 3727248.1 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000358 0 0.83880E-07 469066.3 3727254.2 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000359 0 0.83880E-07 469072.3 3727260.3 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000360 0 0.83880E-07 469078.4 3727266.4 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000361 0 0.83880E-07 469084.4 3727272.5 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000362 0 0.83880E-07 469090.5 3727278.5 390.1 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000363 0 0.83880E-07 469096.6 3727284.6 390.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000364 0 0.83880E-07 469102.6 3727290.7 390.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000365 0 0.83880E-07 469108.7 3727296.8 390.9 3.49 4.00 Page 24 12628 HRA 3.25 YES L0000366 0 0.83880E-07 469114.7 3727302.9 391.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000367 0 0.83880E-07 469109.3 3727308.8 391.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000368 0 0.83880E-07 469103.0 3727314.6 390.8 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000369 0 0.83880E-07 469096.7 3727320.4 390.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000370 0 0.83880E-07 469090.4 3727326.3 390.3 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000371 0 0.83880E-07 469084.1 3727332.1 390.1 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES T *** AERMOD - VERSION 19191 *** *** C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.isc *** 03/14/20 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 *** *** *** 11:38:01 PAGE 6 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONK ELEV URBAN ADJ_U* *** VOLUME SOURCE DATA *** NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT. URBAN EMISSION RATE SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ SOURCE SCALAR VARY ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) BY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L0000372 0 0.83880E-07 469077.8 3727338.0 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000373 0 0.83880E-07 469071.5 3727343.8 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000374 0 0.83880E-07 469065.2 3727349.6 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000375 0 0.83880E-07 469058.9 3727355.5 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000376 0 0.83880E-07 469052.6 3727361.3 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000377 0 0.83880E-07 469046.3 3727367.2 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000378 0 0.83880E-07 469040.0 3727373.0 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000379 0 0.83880E-07 469033.7 3727378.8 390.0 3.49 4.00 Page 25 12628 HRA 3.25 YES L0000380 0 0.83880E-07 469027.4 3727384.7 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000381 0 0.83880E-07 469021.1 3727390.5 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000382 0 0.83880E-07 469014.8 3727396.4 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000383 0 0.83880E-07 469008.5 3727402.2 390.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000384 0 0.83880E-07 469002.2 3727408.0 390.8 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000385 0 0.83880E-07 468995.9 3727413.9 391.1 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000386 0 0.83880E-07 468989.6 3727419.7 391.3 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000387 0 0.83880E-07 468983.3 3727425.6 391.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000388 0 0.83880E-07 468977.0 3727431.4 391.2 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000389 0 0.83880E-07 468970.7 3727437.2 391.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000390 0 0.83880E-07 468964.4 3727443.1 390.8 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000391 0 0.83880E-07 468958.1 3727448.9 390.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000392 0 0.83880E-07 468951.8 3727454.8 390.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000393 0 0.83880E-07 468945.5 3727460.6 390.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000394 0 0.83880E-07 468939.2 3727466.4 390.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000395 0 0.83880E-07 468932.9 3727472.3 390.5 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000396 0 0.83880E-07 468926.6 3727478.1 390.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000397 0 0.83880E-07 468920.3 3727484.0 390.9 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000398 0 0.83880E-07 468914.0 3727489.8 391.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000399 0 0.83880E-07 468907.7 3727495.6 390.9 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000400 0 0.83880E-07 468901.4 3727501.5 390.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000401 0 0.83880E-07 468895.1 3727507.3 390.5 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000402 0 0.83880E-07 468888.8 3727513.2 390.3 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000403 0 0.83880E-07 468882.5 3727519.0 390.1 3.49 4.00 Page 26 12628 HRA 3.25 YES L0000404 0 0.83880E-07 468876.2 3727524.8 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000405 0 0.83880E-07 468869.9 3727530.7 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000406 0 0.83880E-07 468863.6 3727536.5 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000407 0 0.83880E-07 468857.3 3727542.4 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000408 0 0.83880E-07 468851.0 3727548.2 390.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000409 0 0.83880E-07 468844.7 3727554.0 389.8 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000410 0 0.83880E-07 468838.4 3727559.9 389.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000411 0 0.83880E-07 468832.1 3727565.7 389.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES T *** AERMOD - VERSION 19191 *** *** C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.isc *** 03/14/20 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 *** *** *** 11:38:01 PAGE 7 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONK ELEV URBAN ADJ_U* *** VOLUME SOURCE DATA *** NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT. URBAN EMISSION RATE SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ SOURCE SCALAR VARY ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) BY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L0000412 0 0.83880E-07 468825.8 3727571.6 389.2 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000413 0 0.83880E-07 468819.5 3727577.4 389.0 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES L0000414 0 0.83880E-07 468813.2 3727583.2 388.8 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES T *** AERMOD - VERSION 19191 *** *** C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.isc *** 03/14/20 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 *** *** *** 11:38:01 Page 27 12628 HRA PAGE 8 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U* *** AREA SOURCE DATA *** NUMBER EMISSION RATE COORD (SW CORNER) BASE RELEASE X-DIM Y-DIM ORIENT. INIT. URBAN EMISSION RATE SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC X Y ELEV. HEIGHT OF AREA OF AREA OF AREA SZ SOURCE SCALAR VARY ID CATS. /METER**2) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (DEG. ) (METERS) BY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AREA1 0 0.29348E-07 468977.3 3727028.8 388.0 4.11 14.09 16.80 41.27 0.00 YES AREA2 0 0.27437E-07 468994.6 3727091.0 388.0 4.11 12.08 18.17 135.72 0.00 YES AREA3 0 0.20802E-07 469037.2 3727057.8 388.2 4.11 9.80 17.04 131.42 0.00 YES T *** AERMOD - VERSION 19191 *** *** C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.isc *** 03/14/20 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 *** *** *** 11:38:01 PAGE 9 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U* *** SOURCE IDs DEFINING SOURCE GROUPS *** SRCGROUP ID SOURCE IDs ----------- ---------- ALL AREA1 AREA2 AREA3 L0000212 , L0000213 , L0000214 , L0000215 , L0000216 , L0000217 , L0000218 , L0000219 , L0000220 , L0000221 , L0000222 L0000223 L0000224 , L0000225 , L0000226 L0000227 , L0000228 L0000229 , L0000230 , L0000231 , L0000232 , L0000233 , L0000234 , L0000235 , L0000236 , L0000237 , L0000238 L0000239 L0000240 , Page 28 12628 HRA L0000241 L0000242 L0000243 L0000244 L0000245 , L0000246 , L0000247 , L0000248 , L0000249 , L0000250 , L0000251 , L0000252 , L0000253 , L0000254 L0000255 L0000256 , L0000257 L0000258 L0000259 L0000260 L0000261 , L0000262 , L0000263 , L0000264 , L0000265 , L0000266 , L0000267 , L0000268 , L0000269 , L0000270 L0000271 L0000272 , L0000273 L0000274 L0000275 L0000276 L0000277 , L0000278 , L0000279 , L0000280 , L0000281 , L0000282 , L0000283 , L0000284 , L0000285 , L0000286 L0000287 L0000288 , L0000289 L0000290 L0000291 L0000292 L0000293 , L0000294 , L0000295 , L0000296 , L0000297 , L0000298 , L0000299 , L0000300 , L0000301 , L0000302 L0000303 L0000304 , L0000305 L0000306 L0000307 L0000308 L0000309 , L0000310 , L0000311 , L0000312 , L0000313 , L0000314 , L0000315 , L0000316 , L0000317 , L0000318 L0000319 L0000320 , L0000321 L0000322 L0000323 L0000324 L0000325 , L0000326 , L0000327 , L0000328 , L0000329 , L0000330 , L0000331 , L0000332 , L0000333 , L0000334 L0000335 L0000336 , L0000337 L0000338 L0000339 L0000340 L0000341 , L0000342 , L0000343 , L0000344 , L0000345 , L0000346 , L0000347 , L0000348 , L0000349 , L0000350 L0000351 L0000352 , L0000353 L0000354 L0000355 L0000356 L0000357 , L0000358 , L0000359 , L0000360 , L0000361 , L0000362 , L0000363 , L0000364 , L0000365 , L0000366 L0000367 L0000368 , Page 29 12628 HRA T *** AERMOD - VERSION 19191 *** *** C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.isc *** 03/14/20 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 *** *** *** 11:38:01 PAGE 10 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U* *** SOURCE IDs DEFINING SOURCE GROUPS *** SRCGROUP ID SOURCE IDs ----------- ---------- L0000369 , L0000370 , L0000371 , L0000372 , L0000373 , L0000374 L0000375 L0000376 , L0000377 L0000378 L0000379 L0000380 L0000381 , L0000382 , L0000383 , L0000384 , L0000385 , L0000386 , L0000387 , L0000388 , L0000389 , L0000390 L0000391 L0000392 , L0000393 L0000394 L0000395 L0000396 L0000397 , L0000398 , L0000399 , L0000400 , L0000401 , L0000402 , L0000403 , L0000404 , L0000405 , L0000406 L0000407 L0000408 , L0000409 L0000410 L0000411 L0000412 L0000413 , L0000414 , T *** AERMOD - VERSION 19191 *** *** C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.isc *** 03/14/20 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 *** *** *** 11:38:01 PAGE 11 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U* *** SOURCE IDs DEFINED AS URBAN SOURCES *** URBAN ID URBAN POP SOURCE IDs -------- --------- ---------- Page 30 12628 HRA 2189641. AREA1 AREA2 AREA3 L0000212 , L0000213 , L0000214 , L0000215 , L0000216 , L0000217 L0000218 L0000219 L0000220 L0000221 , L0000222 , L0000223 , L0000224 , L0000225 , L0000226 , L0000227 , L0000228 , L0000229 , L0000230 L0000231 L0000232 , L0000233 L0000234 L0000235 L0000236 L0000237 , L0000238 , L0000239 , L0000240 , L0000241 , L0000242 , L0000243 , L0000244 , L0000245 , L0000246 L0000247 L0000248 , L0000249 L0000250 L0000251 L0000252 L0000253 , L0000254 , L0000255 , L0000256 , L0000257 , L0000258 , L0000259 , L0000260 , L0000261 , L0000262 L0000263 L0000264 , L0000265 L0000266 L0000267 L0000268 L0000269 , L0000270 , L0000271 , L0000272 , L0000273 , L0000274 , L0000275 , L0000276 , L0000277 , L0000278 L0000279 L0000280 , L0000281 L0000282 L0000283 L0000284 L0000285 , L0000286 , L0000287 , L0000288 , L0000289 , L0000290 , L0000291 , L0000292 , L0000293 , L0000294 L0000295 L0000296 , L0000297 L0000298 L0000299 L0000300 L0000301 , L0000302 , L0000303 , L0000304 , L0000305 , L0000306 , L0000307 , L0000308 , L0000309 , L0000310 L0000311 L0000312 , L0000313 L0000314 L0000315 L0000316 L0000317 , L0000318 , L0000319 , L0000320 , L0000321 , L0000322 , L0000323 , L0000324 , L0000325 , L0000326 L0000327 L0000328 , L0000329 L0000330 L0000331 L0000332 L0000333 , Page 31 12628 HRA L0000334 , L0000335 , L0000336 , L0000337 , L0000338 , L0000339 , L0000340 , L0000341 , L0000342 L0000343 L0000344 , L0000345 L0000346 L0000347 L0000348 L0000349 , L0000350 , L0000351 , L0000352 , L0000353 , L0000354 , L0000355 , L0000356 , L0000357 , L0000358 L0000359 L0000360 , L0000361 , L0000362 L0000363 L0000364 L0000365 , L0000366 , L0000367 , L0000368 , T *** AERMOD - VERSION 19191 *** *** C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.isc *** 03/14/20 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 *** *** *** 11:38:01 PAGE 12 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONK ELEV URBAN ADJ_U* *** SOURCE IDs DEFINED AS URBAN SOURCES *** URBAN ID URBAN POP SOURCE IDs -------- --------- ---------- L0000369 L0000370 L0000371 L0000372 L0000373 , L0000374 , L0000375 , L0000376 , L0000377 , L0000378 , L0000379 , L0000380 , L0000381 , L0000382 L0000383 L0000384 , L0000385 L0000386 L0000387 L0000388 L0000389 , L0000390 , L0000391 , L0000392 , L0000393 , L0000394 , L0000395 , L0000396 , L0000397 , L0000398 L0000399 L0000400 , L0000401 L0000402 L0000403 L0000404 L0000405 , L0000406 , L0000407 , L0000408 , L0000409 , L0000410 , L0000411 , L0000412 , L0000413 , L0000414 , T *** AERMOD - VERSION 19191 *** *** C:\Lal<es\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.isc *** 03/14/20 Page 32 12628 HRA *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 *** *** *** 11:38:01 PAGE 13 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U* *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS *** (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG) (METERS) ( 469003.3, 3727449.6, 392.0, 392.0, 0.0); ( 469267.0, 3727180.4, 392.9, 517.0, 0.0); ( 468981.0, 3726987.5, 387.6, 516.0, 0.0); ( 468879.9, 3726951.3, 386.2, 441.0, 0.0); ( 468910.4, 3727047.8, 387.0, 439.0, 0.0); T *** AERMOD - VERSION 19191 *** *** C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.isc *** 03/14/20 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 *** *** *** 11:38:01 PAGE 14 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U* *** METEOROLOGICAL DAYS SELECTED FOR PROCESSING *** (1=YES; 0=NO) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NOTE: METEOROLOGICAL DATA ACTUALLY PROCESSED WILL ALSO DEPEND ON WHAT IS INCLUDED IN THE DATA FILE. Page 33 12628 HRA *** UPPER BOUND OF FIRST THROUGH FIFTH WIND SPEED CATEGORIES *** (METERS/SEC) 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80, T *** AERMOD - VERSION 19191 *** *** C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.isc *** 03/14/20 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 *** *** *** 11:38:01 PAGE 15 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U* *** UP TO THE FIRST 24 HOURS OF METEOROLOGICAL DATA *** Surface file: LakeElsinoreADJU\ELSI_V9_ADJU\ELSI_v9.SFC Met Version: 16216 Profile file: LakeElsinoreADJU\ELSI V9 ADJU\ELSI v9.PFL Surface format: FREE Profile format: FREE Surface station no. : 3171 Upper air station no. : 3190 Name: UNKNOWN Name: UNKNOWN Year: 2012 Year: 2012 First 24 hours of scalar data YR MO DY JDY HR H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-0 LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS WD HT REF TA HT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 01 01 1 01 -1.3 0.065 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 40. 18.2 0.23 2.69 1.00 0.40 78. 9.1 284.2 5.5 12 01 01 1 02 -4.2 0.092 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 67. 16.0 0.23 2.69 1.00 0.90 69. 9.1 283.8 5.5 12 01 01 1 03 -4.2 0.092 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 67. 16.0 0.23 2.69 1.00 0.90 286. 9.1 282.5 5.5 12 01 01 1 04 -4.2 0.092 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 67. 16.0 0.23 2.69 1.00 0.90 348. 9.1 282.5 5.5 12 01 01 1 05 -1.3 0.066 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 40. 18.2 0.23 2.69 1.00 0.40 17. 9.1 282.0 5.5 12 01 01 1 06 -4.2 0.092 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 67. 16.0 0.23 2.69 1.00 0.90 161. 9.1 282.0 5.5 Page 34 12628 HRA 12 01 01 1 07 -1.3 0.066 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 40. 18.2 0.23 2.69 1.00 0.40 273. 9.1 282.0 5.5 12 01 01 1 08 -3.6 0.091 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 66. 18.3 0.23 2.69 0.54 0.90 113. 9.1 283.8 5.5 12 01 01 1 09 39.6 0.087 0.358 0.016 40. 61. -1.4 0.23 2.69 0.33 0.40 336. 9.1 285.9 5.5 12 01 01 1 10 110.7 0.206 0.740 0.007 127. 225. -6.9 0.23 2.69 0.25 1.30 158. 9.1 291.4 5.5 12 01 01 1 11 161.7 0.105 1.203 0.005 374. 87. -1.0 0.23 2.69 0.23 0.40 33. 9.1 297.0 5.5 12 01 01 1 12 185.5 0.271 1.535 0.005 676. 339. -9.3 0.23 2.69 0.22 1.80 313. 9.1 298.8 5.5 12 01 01 1 13 183.9 0.219 1.828 0.005 1154. 247. -4.9 0.23 2.69 0.22 1.30 250. 9.1 300.4 5.5 12 01 01 1 14 156.6 0.266 1.869 0.005 1446. 330. -10.4 0.23 2.69 0.23 1.80 217. 9.1 301.4 5.5 12 01 01 1 15 104.7 0.256 1.677 0.005 1562. 311. -13.8 0.23 2.69 0.27 1.80 248. 9.1 302.0 5.5 12 01 01 1 16 32.7 0.319 1.147 0.005 1596. 433. -85.9 0.23 2.69 0.36 2.70 235. 9.1 302.0 5.5 12 01 01 1 17 -15.5 0.190 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 208. 39.6 0.23 2.69 0.63 1.80 46. 9.1 299.2 5.5 12 01 01 1 18 -4.1 0.092 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 73. 16.2 0.23 2.69 1.00 0.90 107. 9.1 294.9 5.5 12 01 01 1 19 -999.0 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -999. -999. -99999.0 0.23 2.69 1.00 999.00 999. -9.0 292.5 5.5 12 01 01 1 20 -4.2 0.092 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 67. 16.1 0.23 2.69 1.00 0.90 323. 9.1 290.4 5.5 12 01 01 1 21 -8.8 0.133 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 116. 23.2 0.23 2.69 1.00 1.30 34. 9.1 287.5 5.5 12 01 01 1 22 -1.3 0.065 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 41. 18.1 0.23 2.69 1.00 0.40 359. 9.1 286.4 5.5 12 01 01 1 23 -1.3 0.065 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 40. 18.1 0.23 2.69 1.00 0.40 351. 9.1 285.4 5.5 12 01 01 1 24 -4.2 0.092 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 67. 16.0 0.23 2.69 1.00 0.90 11. 9.1 284.9 5.5 First hour of profile data YR MO DY HR HEIGHT F WDIR WSPD AMB_TMP sigmaA sigmaW sigmaV 12 01 01 01 5.5 0 -999. -99.00 284.3 99.0 -99.00 -99.00 12 01 01 01 9.1 1 78. 0.40 -999.0 99.0 -99.00 -99.00 F indicates top of profile (=1) or below (=0) T *** AERMOD - VERSION 19191 *** *** C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.isc *** 03/14/20 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 *** *** *** 11:38:01 Page 35 12628 HRA PAGE 16 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U* *** THE ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES AVERAGED OVER 5 YEARS FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL *** INCLUDING SOURCE(S) : AREA1 , AREA2 AREA3 L0000212 L0000213 , L0000214 , L0000215 , L0000216 , L0000217 , L0000218 L0000219 L0000220 L0000221 , L0000222 , L0000223 , L0000224 , L0000225 , L0000226 L0000227 L0000228 L0000229 , L0000230 , L0000231 , L0000232 , L0000233 , L0000234 L0000235 L0000236 , *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTOR POINTS *** ** CONC OF DPM IN MICROGRAMS/M**3 ** X-COORD (M) Y-COORD (M) CONC X-COORD (M) Y-COORD (M) CONC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 469003.28 3727449.64 0.00093 469266.97 3727180.43 0.00040 468981.02 3726987.53 0.00476 468879.91 3726951.32 0.00063 468910.39 3727047.76 0.00168 T *** AERMOD - VERSION 19191 *** *** C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.isc *** 03/14/20 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 *** *** *** 11:38:01 PAGE 17 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U* *** THE SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM ANNUAL RESULTS AVERAGED OVER 5 YEARS *** ** CONC OF DPM IN MICROGRAMS/M**3 ** NETWORK Page 36 12628 HRA GROUP ID AVERAGE CONC RECEPTOR (XR, YR, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG) OF TYPE GRID-ID - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ALL 1ST HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00476 AT ( 468981.02, 3726987.53, 387.62, 516.00, 0.00) DC 2ND HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00168 AT ( 468910.39, 3727047.76, 387.02, 439.00, 0.00) DC 3RD HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00093 AT ( 469003.28, 3727449.64, 391.97, 391.97, 0.00) DC 4TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00063 AT ( 468879.91, 3726951.32, 386.18, 441.00, 0.00) DC 5TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00040 AT ( 469266.97, 3727180.43, 392.89, 517.00, 0.00) DC 6TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00000 AT ( 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00) 7TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00000 AT ( 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00) 8TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00000 AT ( 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00) 9TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00000 AT ( 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00) 10TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00000 AT ( 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00) *** RECEPTOR TYPES: GC = GRIDCART GP = GRIDPOLR DC = DISCCART DP = DISCPOLR T *** AERMOD - VERSION 19191 *** *** C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\12628 HRA\12628 HRA.isc *** 03/14/20 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 *** *** *** 11:38:01 PAGE 18 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONK ELEV URBAN ADJ_U* *** Message Summary : AERMOD Model Execution *** --------- Summary of Total Messages -------- A Total of 0 Fatal Error Message(s) A Total of 2 Warning Message(s) A Total of 1763 Informational Message(s) A Total of 43848 Hours Were Processed Page 37 12628 HRA A Total of 884 Calm Hours Identified A Total of 879 Missing Hours Identified ( 2.00 Percent) ******** FATAL ERROR MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** ME W186 638 MEOPEN: THRESH_1MIN 1-min ASOS wind speed threshold used 0.50 ME W187 638 MEOPEN: ADJ_U* Option for Stable Low Winds used in AERMET ************************************ *** AERMOD Finishes Successfully *** ************************************ Page 38 AVERAGE EMISSION FACTOR RIVERSIDE 2021 Speed LHD1 MHD HHD 0 0.376403 0.215051 0.02138 5 0.03923 0.180749 0.08736 25 0.013853 0.069122 0.03792 Speed Weighted Average Emissions 0 0.16003 5 0.09552 25 0.03851 Emission Rates-2021 Emission Factors Truck Emission Rates VMT a Truck Emission Rate Truck Emission Rate Daily Truck Emissions Modeled Emission Rates Source Trucks Per Day (miles/day) (grams/mile) (grams/idle-hour) (grams/day) (g/second) On-Site Idling Building 1 15 0.1600 0.60 6.946E-06 On-Site Idling Building 2 13 0.1600 0.52 6.020E-06 On-Site Idling Building 3 8 0.1600 0.30 3.473E-06 On-Site Travel Building 1 30 2.40 0.0955 0.23 2.648E-06 On-Site Travel Building 2 26 1.50 0.0955 0.14 1.659E-06 On-Site Travel Building 3 15 0.98 0.0955 0.09 1.087E-06 Off-Site Travel 10%Inbound/Outbound 7 0.93 0.0385 0.04 4.163E-07 Off-Site Travel 40%Inbound/Outbound 28 1.70 0.0385 0.07 7.591 E-07 Off-Site Travel 20%Inbound/Outbound 14 0.84 0.0385 0.03 3.728E-07 Off-Site Travel 30%Inbound/Outbound 21 3.32 0.0385 0.13 1.482E-06 Off-Site Travel 10%Inbound/Outbound 7 0.85 0.0385 0.03 3.793E-07 Off-Site Travel 50%Inbound/Outbound 36 12.61 0.0385 0.49 5.620E-06 a Vehicle miles traveled are for modeled truck route only. b Emission rates determined using EMFAC 2017.Idle emission rates are expressed in grams per idle hour rather than grams per mile. This column includes the total truck travel and truck idle emissions.For idle emissions this column includes emissions based on the assumption that each truck idles for 15 minutes. calendar_)season_mi subarea vehicle—class fuel temperatu relative_hi process speed_tim pollutant emission_rate 2021 Annual Riverside( HHDT Dsl 60 70 RUNEX 5 PM10 0.090872 2021 Annual Riverside( HHDT Dsl 60 70 RUNEX 25 PM10 0.039446 2021 Annual Riverside( LHDT1 Dsl 60 70 RUNEX 5 PM10 0.082192 2021 Annual Riverside( LHDT1 Dsl 60 70 RUNEX 25 PM10 0.029025 2021 Annual Riverside( MHDT Dsl 60 70 RUNEX 5 PM10 0.204727 2021 Annual Riverside( MHDT Dsl 60 70 RUNEX 25 PM10 0.078292 2021 Annual Riverside( HHDT Dsl IDLEX PM10 0.022237 2021 Annual Riverside( LHDT1 Dsl IDLEX PM10 0.788627 2021 Annual Riverside( MHDT Dsl IDLEX PM10 0.243579 EMFAC2017 (0.0.2) Emissions Inventory Region Type: County Region: RIVERSIDE Calendar Year: 2021 19 Season: Annual Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 Categories Units: miles/day for VMT, trips/day for Trips, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption Region Calendar)Vehicle Ca Model Yea Speed Fuel Population RIVERSID 2021 HHDT Aggregate,Aggregate GAS 8.256088 RIVERSID 2021 HHDT Aggregate,Aggregate DSL 27250.49 RIVERSID 2021 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate NG 278.9619 RIVERSID 2021 LHDT1 Aggregate,Aggregate GAS 20885.97 RIVERSID 2021 LHDT1 Aggregate,Aggregate DSL 19999.78 RIVERSID 2021 MHDT Aggregate,Aggregate GAS 1963.204 RIVERSID 2021 MHDT Aggregate,Aggregate DSL 15756.36 HHDT% GAS/NG 0.01043 HHDT% DSL 0.98957 LHDT1%GAS 0.510837 LHDT1% DSL 0.489163 M H DT% GAS 0.110793 MHDT% DSL 0.889207 Pennington Industrial Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment APPENDIX 2.2: RISK CALCULATIONS 12628-04 HRA Report R� 4} � Table 1 Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Hazards -0.25 to 0 Age Bin Exposure Scenario Source Mass GLC Weight Contaminant Carcinogenic Risk Noncarcinogenic Hazards/Toxicological Endpoints** Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RID RESP CNS/PNS CV/EL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (u8 ins) —(mg/ins) (ug/m3)_l (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg-day) (ug/ms) (mg/kg/day) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (]) (k) (1) (m) (n) (o) (p) (q) (r) (s) 0.00093 9.30E-07 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 L1E+00 3.2E-07 1.0E-OS 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 1.9E-04 TOTAL 1.0E-08 1.9E-04 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 ** Key to Toxicological Endpoints RESP Respiratory System CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System CV/BL Cardiovascular/Blood System IMMUN Immune System KIDN Kidney GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver REPRO Reproductive System(e.g.teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake exposure frequency(days/year) 350 exposure duration(years) 0.25 inhalation rate(L/kg-day)) 361 inhalation absorption factor 1 averaging time(years) 70 fraction of time at home 0.85 age sensitivity factor(age third trimester 10 Table 2 Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Hazards 0-2 Age Bin Exposure Scenario Source Mass GLC Weight Contaminant Carcinogenic Risk Noncarcinogenic Hazards/Toxicological Endpoints** Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RID RESP CNS/PNS CV/EL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (ug ins) —(mg/ins) (ug/m3)_l (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg-day) (ug/ms) (mg/kg/day) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) G) (]) (k) (1) (m) (n) (o) (p) (q) (r) (s) 0.00093 9.30E-07 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 L1E+00 9.7E-07 2.5E-07 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 1.9E-04 TOTAL 2.5E-07 1.9E-04 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 ** Key to Toxicological Endpoints RESP Respiratory System CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System CV/BL Cardiovascular/Blood System IMMUN Immune System KIDN Kidney GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver REPRO Reproductive System(e.g.teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake exposure frequency(days/year) 350 exposure duration(years) 2 inhalation rate(L/kg-day)) 1090 inhalation absorption factor 1 averaging time(years) 70 fraction of time at home 0.85 age sensitivity factor(0 to 2 years old) 10 Table 3 Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Hazards 2-16 Age Bin Exposure Scenario Source Mass GLC Weight Contaminant Carcinogenic Risk Noncarcinogenic Hazards/Toxicological Endpoints** Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RID RESP CNS/PNS CV/EL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (ug ins) —(mg/ins) (ug/m3)_l (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg-day) (ug/ms) (mg/kg/day) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (]) (k) (1) (m) (n) (o) (p) (q) (r) (s) 0.00093 9.30E-07 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 L1E+00 5.1E-07 2.3E-07 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 1.9E-04 TOTAL 2.3E-07 1.9E-04 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 ** Key to Toxicological Endpoints RESP Respiratory System CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System CV/BL Cardiovascular/Blood System IMMUN Immune System KIDN Kidney GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver REPRO Reproductive System(e.g.teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake exposure frequency(days/year) 350 exposure duration(years) 14 inhalation rate(L/kg-day)) 572 inhalation absorption factor 1 averaging time(years) 70 fraction of time at home 0.72 age sensitivity factor(ages 2 to 16 years 3 Table 4 Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Hazards 16-30 Age Bin Exposure Scenario Source Mass GLC Weight Contaminant Carcinogenic Risk Noncarcinogenic Hazards/Toxicological Endpoints** Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RfD RESP CNS/PNS CVBL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (ug/ms) (mg/ms) (ug/m3)-' (mg/kg/day)-'(mg/kg-day) (ug/m') (mg/kg/day) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (]) (k) (1) (m) (n) (o) (P) (q) (r) (s) 0.00093 9.30E-07 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 2.3E-07 3.6E-08 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 1.9E-04 TOTAL 3.6E-08 1.9E-04 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.04 *• Key to Toxicological Endpoints RESP Respiratory System CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System CVBL Cardiovascular/Blood System IMMUN Immune System KIDN Kidney GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver REPRO Reproductive System(e.g.teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake exposure frequency(days/year) 350 exposure duration(years) 14 inhalation rate(L/kg-day)) 261 inhalation absorption factor 1 averaging time(years) 70 fraction of time at home 0.73 age sensitivity factor(ages 16 to 30 years old) 1 Total Risk for All Age Bins(per million) 0.53 Table 1 Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Hazards -0.25 to 0 Age Bin Exposure Scenario Source Mass GLC Weight Contaminant Carcinogenic Risk Noncarcinogenic Hazards/Toxicological Endpoints** Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RID RESP CNS/PNS CV/EL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (ug ins) (mg ins) (ug/m3)_l (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg-day) (ug/ms) (mg/kg/day) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) W (]) (k) (1) (m) (n) (o) (p) (q) (r) (s) 0.00040 4.00E-07 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 L1E+O0 1.4E-07 4.4E-09 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 8.0E-05 TOTAL 4.4E-09 8.0E-05 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 ** Key to Toxicological Endpoints RESP Respiratory System CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System CV/BL Cardiovascular/Blood System IMMUN Immune System KIDN Kidney GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver REPRO Reproductive System(e.g.teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake exposure frequency(days/year) 350 exposure duration(years) 0.25 inhalation rate(L/kg-day)) 361 inhalation absorption factor 1 averaging time(years) 70 fraction of time at home 0.85 age sensitivity factor(age third trimester 10 Table 2 Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Hazards 0-2 Age Bin Exposure Scenario Source Mass GLC Weight Contaminant Carcinogenic Risk Noncarcinogenic Hazards/Toxicological Endpoints** Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RID RESP CNS/PNS CV/EL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (ug ins) (mg ins) (ug/m3)_l (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg-day) (ug/ms) (mg/kg/day) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (]) (k) (1) (m) (n) (o) (p) (q) (r) (s) 0.00040 4.00E-07 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 L1E+O0 4.2E-07 1.1E-07 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 8.0E-05 TOTAL 1.1E-07 8.0E-05 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 ** Key to Toxicological Endpoints RESP Respiratory System CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System CV/BL Cardiovascular/Blood System IMMUN Immune System KIDN Kidney GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver REPRO Reproductive System(e.g.teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake exposure frequency(days/year) 350 exposure duration(years) 2 inhalation rate(L/kg-day)) 1090 inhalation absorption factor 1 averaging time(years) 70 fraction of time at home 0.85 age sensitivity factor(0 to 2 years old) 10 Table 3 Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Hazards 2-16 Age Bin Exposure Scenario Source Mass GLC Weight Contaminant Carcinogenic Risk Noncarcinogenic Hazards/Toxicological Endpoints** Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RID RESP CNS/PNS CV/EL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (ug ins) (mg ins) (ug/m3)_l (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg-day) (ug/ms) (mg/kg/day) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (]) (k) (1) (m) (n) (o) (p) (q) (r) (s) 0.00040 4.00E-07 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 L1E+O0 2.2E-07 1.0E-07 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 8.0E-05 TOTAL 1.0E-07 8.0E-05 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 ** Key to Toxicological Endpoints RESP Respiratory System CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System CV/BL Cardiovascular/Blood System IMMUN Immune System KIDN Kidney GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver REPRO Reproductive System(e.g.teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake exposure frequency(days/year) 350 exposure duration(years) 14 inhalation rate(L/kg-day)) 572 inhalation absorption factor 1 averaging time(years) 70 fraction of time at home 0.72 age sensitivity factor(ages 2 to 16 years 3 Table 4 Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Hazards 16-30 Age Bin Exposure Scenario Source Mass GLC Weight Contaminant Carcinogenic Risk Noncarcinogenic Hazards/Toxicological Endpoints** Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RfD RESP CNS/PNS CVBL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (ug/ms) (mg/ms) (ug/m3)-' (mg/kg/day)-'(mg/kg-day) (ug/m') (mg/kg/day) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (]) (k) (1) (m) (n) (o) (P) (q) (r) (s) 0.0004, 4.00E-07 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 1.0E-07 1.5E-08 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 8.0E-05 TOTAL 1.5E-08 8.0E-05 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.02 *• Key to Toxicological Endpoints RESP Respiratory System CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System CVBL Cardiovascular/Blood System IMMUN Immune System KIDN Kidney GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver REPRO Reproductive System(e.g.teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake exposure frequency(days/year) 350 exposure duration(years) 14 inhalation rate(L/kg-day)) 261 inhalation absorption factor 1 averaging time(years) 70 fraction of time at home 0.73 age sensitivity factor(ages 16 to 30 years old) 1 Total Risk for All Age Bins(per million) 0.23 Table 5 Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Risks 25-Year Worker Exposure Scenario Source Mass GLC Weight Contaminant Carcinogenic Risk Noncon mo enic Hazards/Toxicological Endpoints** Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RID RESP [NS/PNS CVBL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (.9/m) (sng/m) (ug/-4, (snB/kB/da➢)-� (mg/kg-day) (u8/ma) (mg/kg/day) b d f h k 1 1 Diesel Particulates 4.76E-03 4.76E-06 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 7.5E-07 2.8E-07 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 9.5E-04 TOTAL 2.8E-07 9.5E-04 0.0E+00 0.0E+40 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.28 **Key to Toxicological Endpoints Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake RESP Respiratory System exposure frequency(days/year) 250 CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System exposure duration(years) 25 CVBL Cardiovascular/Blood System inhalation rate(L)kg-day)) 230 IMMON Immune System inhalation absorption factor 1 KIDN Kidney averaging time(years) 70 GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver REPRO Reproductive System(e.g.teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects 9 of 14 Table 6 Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Risks 9-Year School Child Exposure Scenario Source Mass GLC Weight Contaminant Carcinogenic Risk Noncorcino enic Hazards/Toxicological Endpoints** Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RID RESP [NS/PNS CVBL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (ug/m) (sng/m) mg/m`)-, (snB/kB/da➢)-� (mg/kg-day) (u8/ma) (mg/kg/day) b d f h k 1 1 Diesel Particulates 4.76E-03 4.76E-06 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 1.3E-06 5.4E-07 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 9.5E-04 TOTAL 5.4E-07 9.5E-04 0.0E+00 0.0E+40 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.54 **Key to Toxicological Endpoints Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake RESP Respiratory System exposure frequency(days/year) 180 CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System exposure duration(years) 9 CVBL Cardiovascular/Blood System inhalation rate(L)kg-day)) 572 IMMON Immune System inhalation absorption factor 1 KIDN Kidney averaging time(years) 70 GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver age sensitivity factor(ages 4-13) 3 REPRO Reproductive System(e.g.teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects 10 of 14 Table 5 Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Risks 25-Year Worker Exposure Scenario Source Mass GLC Weight Contaminant Carcinogenic Risk Noncarcino enic Hazards/Toxicological Endpoints** Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RID RESP CNS/PNS CVBL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (.9/m) (sng/m) (ug/-4, (mg/kg/de➢)-� (mg/kg-day) (u8/ma) (mg/kg/day) b d f h k 1 1 Diesel Particulates 6.30E-04 6.30E-07 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 9.9E-08 3.7E-08 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 1.3E-04 TOTAL 3.7E-08 1.3E-04 0.0E+00 0.0E+40 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.04 **Key to Toxicological Endpoints Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake RESP Respiratory System exposure frequency(days/year) 250 CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System exposure duration(years) 25 CVBL Cardiovascular/Blood System inhalation rate(L)kg-day)) 230 IMMON Immune System inhalation absorption factor 1 KIDN Kidney averaging time(years) 70 GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver REPRO Reproductive System(e.g.teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects 11 of 14 Table 6 Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Risks 9-Year School Child Exposure Scenario Source Mass GLC Weight Contaminant Carcinogenic Risk Noncarcino enic Hazards/Toxicological Endpoints** Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RID RESP CNS/PNS CVBL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (ug/m) (sng/m) mg/m`)-' (mg/kg/de➢)-� (mg/kg-day) (u8/ma) (mg/kg/day) b d f h k 1 1 Diesel Particulates 6.30E-04 6.30E-07 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 1.8E-07 7.2E-08 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 1.3E-04 TOTAL 7.2E-08 1.3E-04 0.0E+00 0.0E+40 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.07 **Key to Toxicological Endpoints Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake RESP Respiratory System exposure frequency(days/year) 180 CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System exposure duration(years) 9 CVBL Cardiovascular/Blood System inhalation rate(L)kg-day)) 572 IMMON Immune System inhalation absorption factor 1 KIDN Kidney averaging time(years) 70 GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver age sensitivity factor(ages 4-13) 3 REPRO Reproductive System(e.g.teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects 12 of 14 Table 5 Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Risks 25-Year Worker Exposure Scenario Source Mass GLC Weight Contaminant Carcinogenic Risk Noncon mo enic Hazards/Toxicological Endpoints** Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RID RESP [NS/PNS CVBL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (.9/m) (sng/m) (ug/-4, (snB/kB/da➢)-� (mg/kg-day) (u8/ma) (mg/kg/day) b d f h k 1 1 Diesel Particulates 1.68E-03 1.68E-06 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 2.6E-07 9.9E-08 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 3.4E-04 TOTAL 9.9E-08 3.4E-04 0.0E+00 0.0E+40 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.10 **Key to Toxicological Endpoints Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake RESP Respiratory System exposure frequency(days/year) 250 CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System exposure duration(years) 25 CVBL Cardiovascular/Blood System inhalation rate(L)kg-day)) 230 IMMON Immune System inhalation absorption factor 1 KIDN Kidney averaging time(years) 70 GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver REPRO Reproductive System(e.g.teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects 13 of 14 Table 6 Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Risks 9-Year School Child Exposure Scenario Source Mass GLC Weight Contaminant Carcinogenic Risk Noncorcino enic Hazards/Toxicological Endpoints** Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RID RESP [NS/PNS CVBL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (ug/m) (sng/m) mg/m`)-, (snB/kB/da➢)-� (mg/kg-day) (u8/ma) (mg/kg/day) b d f h k 1 1 Diesel Particulates 1.68E-03 1.68E-06 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 4.7E-07 1.9E-07 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 3.4E-04 TOTAL 1.9E-07 3.4E-04 0.0E+00 0.0E+40 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.19 **Key to Toxicological Endpoints Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake RESP Respiratory System exposure frequency(days/year) 180 CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System exposure duration(years) 9 CVBL Cardiovascular/Blood System inhalation rate(L)kg-day)) 572 IMMON Immune System inhalation absorption factor 1 KIDN Kidney averaging time(years) 70 GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver age sensitivity factor(ages 4-13) 3 REPRO Reproductive System(e.g.teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects 14 of 14 3544 UNIVERSITY AVENUE RIVERSIDE,CALIFORNIA 92501 T 951.300.2100 F 951.300.2105 December 14, 2018 9142 Rod Oshita Fairway Commercial Partners 1601 N. Sepulveda Boulevard, #401 Manhattan Beach, California 90266 Subject. Biological Resources Letter Report and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, California Dear Rod Oshita: This biological resources habitat assessment and Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) consistency analysis letter report describes the existing biological conditions of the proposed Penington Industrial Development Project(project)site and provides an assessment of potential biological impacts. The proposed project and potential impacts to special-status biological resources are analyzed in the context of the California Environmental Quality Act and in the context of the MSHCP. This report describes the project site, the general biological reconnaissance survey conducted, special-status biological resources present or potentially present on site, potential constraints to development that may be posed by biological resources on the project site, and recommended mitigation.This report also provides an MSHCP consistency assessment including the following requirements of the MSHCP(relevant MSHCP sections are identified in parentheses): • Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools(Section 6.1.2) • Additional Survey Needs and Procedures (Section 6.3.2) • Guidelines Pertaining to the Urban/Wildlands Interface (Section 6.1.4) 1 Project Location The approximately 5-acre project site is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Chaney Street and West Minthorn Street in the City of Lake Elsinore(City) in Riverside County(Figure 1, Project Location;all figures can be found in Attachment A).The project site is located within the U.S.Geological Survey 7.5-minute Lake Elsinore quadrangle map, with the approximate center of the property at longitude 117°20'03.66"W and latitude 33°40'58.79"N. The proposed project would involve construction of a new retail development consisting of three new buildings and associated parking and landscaping. 2 Methods For this report, special-status species are those that are (1) listed, proposed for listing, or candidates for listing under the federal Endangered Species Act as threatened or endangered; (2) listed or candidates for listing under the California Endangered Species Act as threatened or endangered; (3) a state fully protected species; (4) a 9142 D U D E K 1 December 2018 Rod Oshita Subject: Biological Resources Letter Report and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, California California Department of Fish and Wildlife Species of Special Concern; (5) a species listed on the California Native Plant Society Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants with a California Rare Plant Rank of 1B or 213; or (6) an MSHCP covered species that requires additional survey requirements. Special-status vegetation communities are those communities identified as high priority for inventory in the List of Vegetation Alliances and Associations (CDFG 2010) by a state rarity ranking of S1, S2, or S3. The study area consisted of the project site and a 500-foot buffer, where accessible. 2.1 Literature Review Special-status biological resources potentially present within the study area were identified through a literature search using the following sources: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Critical Habitat and Occurrence Data (USFWS 2018); California Department of Fish and Wildlife's California Natural Diversity Database (CDFW 2018); the California Native Plant Society's online Inventory of Rare,Threatened, and Endangered Plants (CNPS 2018); and the Calflora database, which compiles observation and plant data from both private and public institutions, including the Consortium of California Herbaria(Calflora 2018).Searches were completed for the following U.S.Geological Survey quadrangles: Lake Mathews,Steele Peak, Perris,Alberhill, Lake Elsinore, Romoland,Sitton Peak,Wildomar,and Murrieta. 2.2 Field Reconnaissance Dudek Biologist Anna Cassady conducted a general biological survey of the study area on November 14,2018.The survey was conducted from 3:45 p.m.to 4:50 p.m.Weather conditions were favorable,with clear skies,wind speeds from 1 to 3 miles per hour, and temperatures ranging from 74'F-72°F. All native and naturalized plant species encountered within the study area were identified and recorded. The potential for special-status plant and wildlife species to occur within the study area was evaluated based on the vegetation communities, soils present, and documented occurrences within 5 miles of the study area.Vegetation communities and land covers were mapped directly in the field onto a 200-foot-scale (1 inch = 200 feet), aerial photograph-based field map of the study area. Following completion of the fieldwork, all vegetation polygons were digitized using ArcGIS and a geographic information system coverage was created. In addition,an investigation of presence and distribution of jurisdictional waters of the United States regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, jurisdictional waters of the state regulated by the Regional Water Quality Control Board,and jurisdictional streambed and associated riparian habitat regulated by California Department of Fish and Wildlife was conducted. Latin and common names for plant species with a California Rare Plant Rank follow the California Native Plant Society Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (CNPS 2018). For plant species without a California Rare Plant Rank, Latin names follow the Jepson Interchange List of Currently Accepted Names of Native and Naturalized Plants of California (Jepson Flora Project 2018) and common names follow the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Natural Resources Conservation Service Plants Database (USDA 2O18a). Natural vegetation communities were mapped in the field using Vegetation Alliances of Western Riverside County (Klein and Evens 2006) with modifications to accommodate the lack of conformity of the observed communities to those included in these references. Latin and common names of animals follow Crother (2012) for reptiles and amphibians and the American Ornithologists' Union for birds(AOU 2015). DUDEK 9142 2 December 2018 Rod Oshita Subject: Biological Resources Letter Report and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, California To meet requirements in the MSHCP,a habitat assessment was conducted to identify suitable habitat for burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) within the project site and a 500-foot buffer. This assessment was conducted in accordance with the Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Area (RCA 2006). 2.2.1 Survey Limitations Access was not available within the 500-foot buffer due to private properties. Therefore, vegetation mapping and habitat assessment within the buffer portion of the study area were both conducted using public roads and/or using aerial signatures of those communities occurring within the proposed project footprint. 3 Results 3.1 Site Description The project site is characterized as an undeveloped lot that appears to be regularly tilled based on a review of Google Earth and Historic Aerials imagery from 1967 to 2018(Google Earth 2018, Historic Aerials 2018). Elevations range from approximately 1,275 to 1,282 feet above mean sea level. The surrounding area includes commercial development to the southwest, northwest, and southeast. Industrial development exists to the northeast.An undeveloped lot is located to the north of the project site, north of Chaney Street. Temescal Wash, in its channelized form, lies approximately 0.2 miles to the south. Representative photographs of the project site are included in Attachment B. 3.2 Soils Three soil types are mapped on the study area: Garretson very fine sandy loam, Arbuckle gravelly loam, and Pachappa fine sandy loam (Figure 2, Soils). • Garretson Series consists of well-drained, moderately permeable soils formed in alluvium from sedimentary formations. These soils are typically found in floodplains and sloping fans (USDA 2O18b). This soil series composes the majority of the study area including the entirety of the project site. • Arbuckle Series consists of well-drained, very deep soils formed from sedimentary and metamorphic rock. These soils are typically found on low terraces (USDA 2O18b). Within the study area, this soil composes a small portion in the northern section. • Cortina Series consists of excessively drained, rapidly permeable soils formed in gravelly alluvium stemming from mixed rock sources. These soils are typically found in alluvial fans and floodplains (USDA 2O18b). Within the study area,this soil series makes up a very small portion in the eastern section. 3.3 Vegetation Communities and Land Covers Two land cover types were classified for the project site: disturbed habitat and developed land. Figure 3, Biological Resources, illustrates the distribution of vegetation communities and land covers,and Table 1 provides a summary of each land cover's extent within the study area. DUDEK 9142 3 December 2018 Rod Oshita Subject: Biological Resources Letter Report and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, California Table 1 Vegetation Communities and Land Covers within the Study Area Vegetation Community/Land Cover Acreage Disturbed Habitat 3.49 Developed Land 35.27 Total 38.76 3.3.1 Disturbed Habitat Although not recognized by the Vegetation Alliances of Western Riverside County, the classification of disturbed habitat is due to the predominance of bare ground and compacted soils with a sparse covering of non-native plant species and other disturbance-tolerant plant species.Oberbauer et al. (2008)describes disturbed habitat as areas that have been physically disturbed by previous human activity and are no longer recognizable as native or naturalized vegetation associations but that continue to retain a soil substrate. Within the study area, disturbed habitat makes up the entirety of the project site and a parcel of land within the study area to the north,across Chaney Street.Within the project site,there is evidence of recent and frequent tilling, with loose soils and an absence of all vegetation throughout. Several weedy species, including Russian thistle (Salsola tragus) and musky stork's bill (Erodium moschatum), were detected along the borders of the project site. A small patch of salt grass (Distichlis spicata) was located in the eastern corner of the project site in a small area that had not been tilled.A single tall flatsedge(Cyperus eragrostis)was detected on the project site's eastern corner boundary.This species was located within the landscaping of the adjacent property to the southeast and may have cultivated as a result of landscape-affiliated irrigation. While it is unknown how frequent tillings of the project site occur,a review of historic aerials back to 1967 indicates that the project site has historically contained grassland or scrub vegetation, but has been disturbed and tilled since between 1980 and 1994 (Historic Aerials 2018). 3.3.2 Developed Land Although not recognized by the Vegetation Alliances of Western Riverside County, developed land refers to areas that have been constructed on or disturbed so severely that native vegetation is no longer supported. Developed land includes areas with permanent or semi-permanent structures, pavement or hardscape, landscaped areas,and areas with a large amount of debris or other materials. The portions of the study area mapped as developed include the areas surrounding the project site. This area comprises roadways and commercial and industrial development. DUDEK 9142 4 December 2018 Rod Oshita Subject: Biological Resources Letter Report and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, California 3.4 Floral Diversity A total of six species of native or naturalized plants—two native (33%) and four non-native (67%)—were recorded within the study area. This low plant diversity reflects the study area's disturbed environment and its proximity to adjacent developed areas. Plant species observed within the study area are listed in Attachment C. 3.5 Wildlife A total of two bird species were detected within the study area: common raven (Corvus corax) and horned lark (Eremophila alpestris). No active bird nests were observed within the study area during the reconnaissance survey; however,the study area could support nesting birds and the survey was done outside the nesting season for most avian species. No amphibian species were observed, and none are expected to occur due to the lack of aquatic habitat. No reptile species were observed duringthe survey; however,western fence lizard(Sceloporus occidentalis) and common side-blotched lizard (Uta stansburiana) are expected to occur. No mammal species were observed during the survey, and none are expected due to the developed surroundings. The low wildlife diversity reflects the relatively disturbed nature of the study area, as well as the lack of contiguous habitat. Wildlife species observed within the study area are listed in Attachment D. 3.6 Special-Status Plant Species No plant species listed or proposed for listing as rare,threatened,or endangered by either the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service were detected within the study area. No plant species considered sensitive by the California Native Plant Society were observed.The study area is not within critical habitat for any special-status plant species (USFWS 2018). Based on the results of the literature review and database searches, 47 special-status plant species have been documented within the region. All of these species were evaluated for potential to occur within the study area. Criteria used include soils, current disturbance levels, vegetation communities present, elevation ranges, and previous known locations based on the California Natural Diversity Database,California Native Plant Society,and Calflora records.A list of and determination of potential to occur for these species can be found in Attachment E. One federally endangered plant species has a low potential to occur in the study area, San Diego ambrosia (Ambrosia pumila), which is described further below. Additionally, all non-listed special-status plant species were determined to have no or low potential to occur within the study area.This is due to the disturbed nature of the project site.The project site appears to be actively tilled,with loose,sandy soils and a lack of vegetation.Due to the lack of potential for significant impacts to non-listed special-status species with a low potential to occur,these are not discussed further in this report. 3.6.1 San Diego Ambrosia San Diego ambrosia is a federally endangered species with a California Rare Plant Rank 1B.1, indicating that it is also a rare,threatened,or endangered species within California with a high degree/immediacy of threat. It is listed as a Narrow Endemic Plant Species (NEPS) under the MSHCP; however, the project site does not fall within a NEPS survey area requiring assessment for this species(see Section 4,Western Riverside County MSHCP Consistency Analysis, below). DUDEK 9142 5 December 2018 Rod Oshita Subject: Biological Resources Letter Report and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, California This species is a perennial, rhizomatous herb that typically occurs in sandy loam or clay soils at elevations between 65 and 1,360 feet above mean sea level. Characteristic vegetation associations include chaparral, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grasslands, vernal pools, and disturbed areas. Within the project site, there is low potential for this species to occur. The project site is within the appropriate elevation range, has sandy loam substrate, and contains disturbed vegetation communities; however, the project site does not contain other characteristic vegetation associations for this species. However, as the project site appears to have been tilled at the time of the reconnaissance survey, it is possible that one of these vegetation communities would occupy the project site in the absence of regular tilling. San Diego ambrosia has been documented as occurring approximately 1.3 miles northwest of the project site(CDFW 2018). San Diego ambrosia is a covered species under the MSHCP. 3.7 Special-Status Wildlife Species No wildlife species listed or proposed for listing as rare, threatened, or endangered by either the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service were detected within the study area. The study area is not within critical habitat for any special-status wildlife species(USFWS 2018). Based on the results of the literature review and database searches, 41 special-status wildlife species have been documented in the project vicinity (CDFW 2018). For each species listed, a determination was made regarding potential use of the study area by the species based on information gathered during the field reconnaissance, known habitat preferences, and knowledge of the species' relative distributions in the area. A list of and determination of potential to occur for these species can be found in Attachment F. Due to the developed nature of the study area,all non-listed special-status wildlife species were determined to either have low potential to occur or were not expected to occur within the project site. Due to the lack of potential for significant impacts to non-listed special-status species with a low potential to occur,these are not discussed further in this report. The proposed project is located within the MSHCP Burrowing Owl Habitat Assessment Area. In accordance with the MSHCP,a habitat assessment was conducted for this species. Burrowing owl and the potential for it to occur within the study area are described below. 3.7.1 Burrowing Owl Habitat Assessment The burrowing owl is a California Species of Special Concern. With a relatively wide-ranging distribution throughout the west, burrowing owl is considered to be a habitat generalist (Lantz et al. 2004). In California, burrowing owl is a yearlong resident of open, dry grassland and desert habitats and grass, forb, and open shrub stages of pinyon- juniper and ponderosa pine habitats (Zeiner et al. 1990). Preferred habitat is generally typified by short, sparse vegetation with few shrubs; level to gently sloping topography; and well-drained soils(Haug et al. 1993). The presence of burrows is the most essential component of burrowing owl habitat,as they are required for nesting, roosting, cover, and caching prey. In California, western burrowing owl most commonly lives in burrows created by California ground squirrels(Spermophilus(Otospermophilus)beecheyi). Burrowing owl may occur in human-altered landscapes such as agricultural areas, ruderal grassy fields,vacant lots, and pastures if the vegetation structure is DUDEK 9142 6 December 2018 Rod Oshita Subject: Biological Resources Letter Report and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, California suitable (i.e., open and sparse), useable burrows are available, and foraging habitat is close (Gervais et al. 2008). Debris piles, riprap, culverts, and pipes can also be used for nesting and roosting. The nearest documented occurrence of burrowing owl is approximately 4.6 miles southeast of the study area. This occurrence was documented in 2007 (CDFW 2018). The project site is disturbed and appears to be regularly tilled.At the time of the reconnaissance survey,the project site was unvegetated and contained loose, sandy soils not capable of supporting burrows. A concrete debris pile located in the southern corner of the project site contains interstitial space and adequate cover that could act as a burrow surrogate for burrowing owl; however,the project site lacks continuity with other open space, decreasing its potential as habitat for burrowing owl.As such, potential is low for this species. 3.7.2 Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Stephens' kangaroo rat (Dipodomys stephensi) is a federally endangered and state threatened species, as well as a MSHCP- and SKRHCP-covered species. This species is a granivore that typically occurs within sparsely vegetated, perennial vegetation with friable soils suitable for burrowing(Zeiner et al. 1990).Stephens' kangaroo rat may excavate their own burrows but are also known to convert gopher or California ground squirrel burrows for their own purposes. Another habitat characteristic is patches of fine-grained soil that can be used for dust bathing(RCHCA 1996). The project site is located within the SKRHCP but is not located within a Stephens' kangaroo rat Core Reserve Area. As such, potential impacts to this species are covered by the SKRHCP. However, the project site is routinely tilled with loose, sandy soils and therefore does not provide suitable habitat for this species. There is no potential for Stephens' kangaroo rat within the project site. 3.7.3 Nesting Birds The project site is disturbed and lacking vegetation; however, ground-nesting birds such as killdeer (Charadrius vociferus) or horned lark may utilize the disturbed portions of the project site. The project site does not contain large trees suitable for raptor nesting. 3.8 Jurisdictional Waters and Significant Drainage Courses The study area does not contain jurisdictional waters or significant drainage courses. A storm drain is located on the southeastern border of the project site,directly abutting the development to the southeast.The storm drain appears to be affiliated with the adjacent development by collecting runoff water from the landscaping and parking lot. Due to the project site's proximity to Temescal Wash to the south, it can be assumed that this storm drain leads to Temescal Wash. 3.9 Wildlife Corridors and Habitat Linkages Wildlife corridors are linear features that connect large patches of natural open space and provide avenues for the migration of animals. Habitat linkages are small patches that join larger blocks of habitat and help reduce the adverse effects of habitat fragmentation; they may be continuous habitat or discrete habitat islands that function as stepping DUDEK 9142 7 December 2018 Rod Oshita Subject: Biological Resources Letter Report and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, California stones for wildlife dispersal. Wildlife movement through the project site is unlikely due to the developed nature of surrounding land use.Therefore,the study area has limited to no value as a potential wildlife corridor or habitat linkage. 4 Western Riverside County MSHCP Consistency Analysis The projectsite is located in the MSHCP Elsinore Area Plan and must comply with relevant section of the MSHCP.The project site is not within an MSHCP Criteria Cell (Figure 4, MSHCP Overview);therefore, no Reserve Assembly requirements would apply to the project site.The project's compliance with the relevant sections of the MSHCP is discussed below. 4.1 MSHCP Section 6.1.2 Riparian/Riverine and Vernal Pool Resources The MSHCP defines riparian/riverine areas as "lands which contain habitat dominated by trees, shrubs, persistent emergent, or emergent mosses and lichens,which occur close to or which depend upon soil moisture from a nearby fresh water source; or areas with fresh water flow during all or a portion of the year." The MSHCP further clarifies those areas "demonstrating characteristics as described above which are artificially created are not included in these definitions" (County of Riverside 2003). The project site does not contain riparian vegetation or riverine features.As such,there is no suitable habitat for riparian birds, least Bell's vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus), southwestern willow flycatcher(Empidonax traillii extimus), or yellow-billed cuckoo(Coccyzus americanus). Due to the lack of suitable habitat,focused surveys were not conducted. 4.1.1 Vernal Pool and Fairy Shrimp Habitat The project site does not contain topographic low points or evidence of pooling. Additionally, no clay, hardpan, or poorly-draining soils are mapped within the project site. Damp soil was observed on the southeastern boundary of the project site during the reconnaissance survey; however, this is believed to be associated with the landscaped development to the southeast. Review of historic aerials does not indicate evidence of ponding within the project site, nor do soil maps indicate soils with water-retaining properties. The remainder of the study area does not contain clay soils, bedrock, or other poorly drained soils typically associated with vernal pools. During the survey, no other topographic low points or indicators of ponding were observed within the study area and are not present on historic aerials (Historic Aerials 2018). 4.2 MSHCP Section 6.3.2 Additional Survey Needs The MSHCP establishes habitat assessment areas for certain species of plants, birds, mammals, and amphibians. The study area is in a required habitat assessment area for burrowing owl (Figure 5, MSHCP Survey Requirements). As discussed in Section 3.7, Special-Status Wildlife Species, of this report, a Step I-A survey, the burrowing owl habitat assessment, identified marginal potential burrowing owl habitat. Potential habitat has been reduced due to the recent tilling of the project site and the absence of foraging vegetation and burrows due to this tilling.As such, a Step II-A focused burrow survey is recommended in the spring prior to construction so as to determine if project site conditions have changed. Whether Step ll-B focused burrowing owl surveys are necessary will be determined DUDEK 9142 8 December 2018 Rod Oshita Subject: Biological Resources Letter Report and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, California following the results of the Step II-A survey. Additionally, to avoid potential for significant impacts to burrowing owl during construction activities, a pre-construction burrowing owl survey should be conducted and avoidance measures implemented if burrowing owls are present. 4.3 MSHCP Section 6.1.4 Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines According to the MSHCP,the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines are intended to address indirect effects associated with locating development in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area(MSHCP,6-42).The project site is not adjacent to any conserved areas (Figure 4); however,the storm drain on the southeastern side is assumed to lead to Temescal Wash,which is described for conservation.As such,the proposed project will implement the following Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines from the MSHCP(County of Riverside 2003)that are applicable to downstream resources. Drainage Proposed Developments in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area shall incorporate measures, including measures required through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System requirements, to ensure that the quantity and quality of runoff discharged to the MSHCP Conservation Area is not altered in an adverse way when compared with existing conditions. In particular, measures shall be put in place to avoid discharge of untreated surface runoff from developed and paved areas into the MSHCP Conservation Area. Stormwater systems shall be designed to prevent the release of toxins, chemicals, petroleum products, exotic plant materials, or other elements that might degrade or harm biological resources or ecosystem processes within the MSHCP Conservation Area.This can be accomplished using a variety of methods including natural detention basins, grass swales, or mechanical trapping devices. Regular maintenance shall occur to ensure effective operations of runoff control systems. Toxics Land uses proposed in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area that use chemicals or generate bioproducts such as manure that are potentially toxic or may adversely affect wildlife species, habitat, or water quality shall incorporate measures to ensure that application of such chemicals does not result in discharge to the MSHCP Conservation Area. Measures such as those employed to address drainage issues shall be implemented. I nvasives When approving landscape plans for development that is proposed adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area, permittees shall consider the invasive, non-native plant species listed in Table 6-2 and shall require revisions to landscape plans(subject to the limitations of their jurisdiction)to avoid the use of invasive species for the portions of development that are adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area. Considerations in reviewing the applicability of this list shall include proximity of planting areas to the MSHCP Conservation Areas, species considered in the planting plans, resources being protected within the MSHCP Conservation Area and their relative sensitivity to invasion, and barriers to plant and seed dispersal, such as walls,topography, and other features. DUDEK 9142 9 December 2018 Rod Oshita Subject: Biological Resources Letter Report and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, California 5 Impacts Analysis and Recommendations This section addresses potential impacts to special-status biological resources that could result from implementation of the proposed project. This section follows the California Environmental Quality Act checklist for biological resources. For the purposes of this biological analysis, it is assumed that the entire project site would be permanently impacted (Figure 6, Impacts). 5.1 Special-status Vegetation Communities No special-status vegetation communities occur on the project site; therefore, no impacts to special-status vegetation communities would occur with project implementation.Table 2 lists impacts to the land covers found on the project site. Table 2 Impacts to Land Covers on the Project Site Vegetation Community/Land Cover Acreage Disturbed Land - Developed Land 4.74 Total 4.74 5.2 Special-Status Plants There are no special-status plant species that have moderate or high potential to occur within the project site. One federally endangered plant, San Diego ambrosia, has a low potential to occur within the project site. This species is a MSHCP NEPS; NEPS require additional survey requirements when a project site is located within a NEPS habitat assessment area.The project site is not located within a NEPS habitat assessment area,which means that this species is covered by the MSHCP with payment of the MSHCP Development Mitigation Fee. As such, impacts to special-status plants are considered less than significant. 5.3 Special-Status Wildlife One non-listed special-status wildlife species, burrowing owl, has a low potential to occur within the project site. Because of the recent tilling of the project site and the absence of foraging vegetation and burrows due to this tilling,the project site was not suitable for burrowing owl at the time of the survey. However, should the site remain fallow, ground squirrels could occupy the site, providing suitable burrows for burrowing owl. If burrowing owl occupy the site prior to construction, the proposed project would result in direct impacts to burrowing owl. Direct impacts would be considered significant. Implementation of Mitigation Measure (MM) BIO-1 and MM-BIO-2 would reduce direct impacts to burrowing owl to less than significant. Only one area outside the project site within the study area would have potential to be occupied by burrowing owl, the vacant lot at the northeast corner of Chaney Street and Minthorn Street. Because this area is separated from DUDEK 9142 10 December 2018 Rod Oshita Subject: Biological Resources Letter Report and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, California the project site by Chaney Street,construction of the project is not expected to result in indirect impacts to burrowing owl should they occupy that area. Potential indirect impacts to burrowing owl are would be less than significant. 5.3.1 Nesting Birds Project construction could result in direct and indirect impacts to nesting birds, including the loss of nests, eggs, and fledglings if vegetation clearing and ground-disturbing activities occur duringthe avian nesting season (typically March 1 through August 31). If the nesting bird season cannot be avoided, a nesting bird survey should be conducted and avoidance measures implemented if nests are documented within the impact footprint or within 300 feet of the impact footprint(MM-1310-3). 5.4 Jurisdictional Waters The proposed project site does not contain jurisdictional waters;therefore,the proposed project would not result in impacts to this resource. 5.5 Wildlife Corridors and Nursery Sites The project site does not function as a wildlife corridor and does not support any wildlife nursery sites. As a result, implementation of the proposed project would not result in impacts to these resources. 5.6 Habitat Conservation Plans The project site overlaps two habitat conservation plans, the MHSCP and the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan (SKRHCP). 5.6.1 MSHCP The project site is within the MSHCP Plan Area. As described in Section 4, the project site does not support riparian/riverine resources, vernal pools, or fairy shrimp habitat; therefore, there are no requirements under the MSHCP for these resources. The project site supports potential burrowing owl habitat; therefore, MM-1310-1 and MM-1310-2 would be implemented to reduce impacts to this species. The project also connects to downstream resources available for conservation; therefore, the Urban/Wildlife Interface Guidelines are applicable, listed as MM-1310-4. With implementation of applicable Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines,the project would be consistent with this section of the MSHCP. With payment of the MSHCP Development Mitigation Fee and implementation of MM-1310-1, MM-1310-2, and MM- 1310-4,the proposed project would be consistent with the MSHCP. DUDEK 9142 11 December 2018 Rod Oshita Subject: Biological Resources Letter Report and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, California 5.6.2 Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan The project site is within the SKRHCP boundary; however, is not within a Stephens' kangaroo rat Core Reserve area (RCHCA 1996).Additionally,there was no evidence of small mammal burrows within the project site. With payment of the SKRHCP Development Mitigation Fee, in accordance with City Ordinance Ord. 1018 § 1, 1996,the proposed project would be consistent with the SKRHCP. 5.7 Other Local Ordinances Two City ordinances are applicable to biological resources, the Habitat Conservation Ordinance (Ord. 1018 § 1, 1996) and Significant Palm Trees(Ord. 1044 § 1, 1999. Code 1987 § 5.78.030). 5.7.1 Habitat Conservation Ordinance This ordinance requires certain implementation measures in accordance with the SKRHCP and it adopts and imposes an impact and mitigation fee to provide funds to the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency to implement the terms of the SKRHCP. The City, from information provided by the applicant for the development permit, shall complete and deliver to the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency a land disturbance report for all development permits issued for real property located within the boundaries of the plan area which shall set forth the location of the land disturbed, the number of acres within the parcel to be developed, the amount of the impact and mitigation fee paid, if any, and the number of acres occupied by Stephens' kangaroo rats which have been disturbed, if any, as described in a biological survey, if required.This biological report provides the information needed by the City to include for the subject project in the land disturbance report.There are no areas suitable for Stephens' kangaroo rats within the project site. The ordinance further states that the applicant shall provide the City with a biological survey for Stephens' kangaroo rats for development projects within any Core Reserve areas. The project is not within a Stephens' kangaroo rat Core Reserve area. Further,the project site does not support suitable habitat for Stephens' kangaroo rat. The ordinance also establishes mitigation fees for projects within the SKRHCP.The project will pay any development and mitigation fees required by the City as stipulated in the ordinance. The project site is not within an SKRHCP Core Reserve area and does not support suitable Stephens' kangaroo rat habitat. Further, the project will pay required SKRHCP development and mitigation fees. Therefore, the project is consistent with this local ordinance. 5.7.2 Significant Palm Trees This ordinance states that no significant palm growing within the City limits may be removed or relocated unless and until a permit has first been obtained from the Office of the Director of Community Services.There are no palm trees within the project site;therefore,the project would not be in conflict with this ordinance. DUDEK 9142 12 December 2018 Rod Oshita Subject: Biological Resources Letter Report and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, California 6 Avoidance, Minimization and Mitigation Measures The following measures are recommended to avoid, minimize and/or mitigate impacts to special-status resources. MM-BIO-1: In accordance with the MSHCP, a Step II-A focused burrow survey will be conducted by a qualified biologist in the spring prior to construction. If project site conditions have changed to include suitable habitat for burrowing owl, defined as suitable burrows or burrow structures with openings 4 inches or greater in diameter and vegetation suitable for foraging, Step II-B focused burrowing owl surveys will be conducted prior to project implementation.All Step II surveys will be conducted by a qualified biologist in accordance with the Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Area (RCA 2006). If surveys confirm that occupied burrowing owl habitat is located within the impact footprint or within 500 feet of the impact footprint, the project proponent will contact the City, who will inform the wildlife agencies and coordinate the potential need for a Burrowing Owl Protection and Relocation Plan prior to ground disturbance. MM-BIO-2: Prior to initiation of construction activities, a burrowing owl pre-construction survey shall be conducted in accordance with the Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Area (RCA 2006). In accordance with these instructions, this survey would occur within 30 days prior to ground-disturbance activities.A minimum of one survey site visit within the described time frame prior to disturbance is required to confirm presence or absence of owls on the site. Pre-construction surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist. If surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat is located within the impact footprint or within 500 feet of the impact footprint, avoidance measures shall be implemented consistent with the requirements of the MSHCP. MM-BIO-3: To maintain compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Fish and Game Code, if ground disturbance and/or vegetation clearance activities are scheduled to occur during the avian nesting season,a pre-construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within the project footprint and a 300-foot buffer around the project footprint.Surveys shall be conducted within 3 days prior to initiation of activity and will be conducted between dawn and noon. If an active nest is detected during the nesting bird survey, avoidance buffers shall be implemented as determined by a qualified biologist.The buffer will be of a distance to ensure avoidance of adverse effects to the nesting bird by accounting for topography,ambient conditions,species, nest location, and activity type.All nests will be monitored as determined by the qualified biologist until nestlings have fledged and dispersed or it is confirmed thatthe nest has been unsuccessful or abandoned.The qualified biologist will stop construction activities should disturbance to the nest from construction activities be identified. MM-BIO-4: To maintain compliance with the MSHCP, the proposed project will implement the following Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines in order to protect potential downstream resources. DUDEK 9142 13 December 2018 Rod Oshita Subject: Biological Resources Letter Report and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, California Drainage Proposed developments in proximityto the MSHCP Conservation Area shall incorporate measures, including measures required through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System requirements, to ensure that the quantity and quality of runoff discharged to the MSHCP Conservation Area is not altered in an adverse way when compared with existing conditions. In particular, measures shall be put in place to avoid discharge of untreated surface runoff from developed and paved areas into the MSHCP Conservation Area. Stormwater systems shall be designed to prevent the release of toxins, chemicals, petroleum products, exotic plant materials, or other elements that might degrade or harm biological resources or ecosystem processes within the MSHCP Conservation Area. This can be accomplished using a variety of methods including natural detention basins, grass swales, or mechanical trapping devices. Regular maintenance shall occur to ensure effective operations of runoff control systems. Toxics Land uses proposed in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area that use chemicals or generate bioproducts such as manure that are potentially toxic or may adversely affect wildlife species, habitat, or water quality shall incorporate measures to ensure that application of such chemicals does not result in discharge to the MSHCP Conservation Area. Measures such as those employed to address drainage issues shall be implemented. Invasives When approving landscape plans for development that is proposed adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area, permittees shall consider the invasive, non-native plant species listed in Table 6-2 and shall require revisions to landscape plans (subject to the limitations of their jurisdiction) to avoid the use of invasive species for the portions of development that are adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area. Considerations in reviewing the applicability of this list shall include proximity of planting areas to the MSHCP Conservation Areas, species considered in the planting plans, resources being protected within the MSHCP Conservation Area and their relative sensitivity to invasion,and barriers to plant and seed dispersal,such as walls,topography and otherfeatures. DUDEK 9142 14 December 2018 Rod Oshita Subject: Biological Resources Letter Report and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, California 7 Conclusions The proposed project has the potential to result in significant impacts to burrowing owl and nesting birds. With implementation of avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures as described in Section 6, the project would have less-than-significant impacts to biological resources. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this report, please either email sriggs@dudek.com or call at 951.300.2184. Sincerely, &1ah Riggs Project Manager Att.: Attachment A—Figures 1-6 Attachment B—Site Photographs Attachment C—Vascular Plant Species Attachment D—Wildlife Species Attachment E—Special-Status Plant Species Detected or Potentially Occurring in the Study Area Attachment F—Special-Status Wildlife Species Detected or Potentially Occurring in the Study Area Attachment G—Wetland Determination Data Form 8 References Cited AOU (American Ornithologists' Union). 2015. Checklist of North and Middle American Birds. 7th Edition and Supplements. http://checklist.aou.org/taxa/. Calflora. 2018. The Calflora Database. Berkeley, California: Calflora. Accessed December 2018. http://www.calflora.org/. CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2010. List of Vegetation Alliances and Associations:Natural Communities List Arranged Alphabetically by Life Form. September 2010. http://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/vegcamp/natural-comm-list.asp. CDFW(California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2018. California Natural Diversity Database. RareFind, Version 5 (Commercial Subscription). Sacramento, California: CDFW, Biogeographic Data Branch.Accessed December 2018. https://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cnddb/mapsanddata.asp. CNPS (California Native Plant Society). 2018. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online ed., version 8-02). Sacramento, California: CNPS, Rare Plant Program. Accessed December 2018. http://www.rareplants.cnps.org. DUDEK 9142 15 December 2018 Rod Oshita Subject: Biological Resources Letter Report and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, California County of Riverside. 2003. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. County of Riverside,Transportation and Land Management Agency, Riverside County Integrated Project. MSHCP adopted June 17, 2003. Accessed December 2018. http://www.rctima.org/mshcp. Crother, B.I. 2012. Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with Comments Regarding Confidence in our Understanding, edited by J.J. Moriarty. 7th ed. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles (SSAR); Herpetological Circular no. 39. August 2012. http://home.gwu.edu/-rpyron/publications/Crother_et_al_2O12.pdf. Gervais,J.A., D.K. Rosenberg, and L.A. Comrack. 2008. "Burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia)." In California Bird Species of Special Concern:A Ranked Assessment of Species, Subspecies, and Distinct Populations of Birds of Immediate Conservation Concern in California, edited by W.D. Shuford and T. Gardali, 218-226. Studies of Western Birds no. 1. California: Western Field Ornithologists(Camarillo), and California Department of Fish and Game (Sacramento). February 4, 2008. http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/ nongame/ssc/birds.html. Google Earth. 2018. Googleearth.com.Accessed December 2018. Haug, E.A., B.A. Millsap, and M.S. Martell. 1993. "The Burrowing Owl (Speotyto cunicularia)." In The Birds of North America, edited by A. Poole and F. Gill. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania:The Academy of Natural Sciences, and Washington, D.C.:The American Ornithologists' Union. Historic Aerials. 2018. www.historicaerials.com.Accessed December 2018. Jepson Flora Project. 2018.Jepson eFlora. Berkeley, California: University of California. http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.htmi. Klein, A., and J. Evens. 2006. Vegetation Alliances of Western Riverside County, California. Final report prepared for the California Department of Fish and Game Habitat Conservation Division. Sacramento, California: California Native Plant Society. Published August 2005; revised April 2006.Accessed December 2018. www.cnps.org/cnps/vegetion/pdf/wriv_vegetation_cnpsfinalreport_April2OO6.pdf. Lantz, S.J., H. Smith, and D.A. Keinath. 2004.Species Assessment for Western Burrowing Owl(Athene cunicularia hypugaea) in Wyoming. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Interior and Bureau of Land Management. Oberbauer, T., M. Kelly, and J. Buegge. 2008. Draft Vegetation Communities of San Diego County. March 2008. http://www.sdcanyonlands.org/ca nyon-groups/ca nyon-group-resources/ca nyon-en hancement- guide/189-canyonenhancement-planning-guide-materials. DUDEK 9142 16 December 2018 Rod Oshita Subject: Biological Resources Letter Report and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project, City of Lake Elsinore, California RCA(Resource Conservation Authority). 2006. Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Area. March 29, 2006.Accessed December 2018. http://rctlma.org/PorLais/1/EPD/consultant/ burrowing owl_survey_ instructions.pdf. RCHCA(Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency). 1996. Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat in Western Riverside County, California. March 1996. USDA(U.S. Department of Agriculture). 2O18a. "California."State PLANTS Checklist. http://plants.usda.gov/ dl_state.html. USDA. 2O18b. Web Soil Survey. USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil Survey Staff. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/. USFWS. 2018. Critical Habitat and Occurrence Data.Accessed May 2018. http://fws.maps.arcgis.com/ home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap= 9d8de5e265ad4feO9893cf75b8dbfb77. Zeiner, D.C., W.F. Laudenslayer Jr., K.E. Mayer, and M. White, eds. 1990. California's Wildlife: Volume III. Mammals. Sacramento, California: California Department of Fish and Game. DUDEK 9142 17 December 2018 N41 Attachment A Figures 1-6 � : Needles -,7, arstow 40 Adelanto 15 ••leValley San 18BernardinoL �� • c 5� s a ''� 0�� BURNET ST Rill `- 4,,� ►I SST B so Perris'a at city P.1 Z y Corona C.thedral� Indio oBlythe THIRDDeJ a yC ►,Ir ,a ` . COUNTY- ST S�SQ D �s �s ++ ImperialUceanside County Via a San Marcos �a oN CANYON R ss 78 ' �Pyy Wgorland5� l J Encinitas + �1, �I San Diegois s7 1San fego El Centro Holl �- ^p El Cajon t, 2 94 a A9S 11.L1NOIS ST RE1D ST -.; c �tr,Y �y� y POST'ER 5� Py .� �5 y� �P 5� tiO Calexico 40 L'-CJ.nY.�L9JC7U(�l.Ul1 h. �'.�� O .y ([, y"•y � y r 2.'.h -vl- ., d .p _ RANKL/ly-S'f Project Site SOURCE:DigitalGlobe 2017 Project • • DUDEK N Biological Feet 1urces Letter Report and MSHCP Consistency1 11n Industrial Project \ r AIE AIE GdA r } PaA r �` , . . _ + Q Project Site 1=! Study Area Soil Type �1 AkC-Arbuckle loam,2 to 8 percent i Cnd slopes AIE-Arbuckle gravelly loam, 15 to 25 � percent slopes + ' - CnC-Cortina gravelly coarse sandy loam,2 to 8 percent slop es I AIE I } GaA-Garretson very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 1 I 1 GdA-Garretson gravelly very fine } GdC 1 sandy loam,0 to 2 percent slopes 1 1 GdC-Garretson gravelly very fine 1 sandy loam,2 to 8 percent slopes f GcID2-Garretson gravelly very fine sandy loam,8 to 15 percen t slopes, eroded HnD2-Honcut sandy loam,8 to 15 percent slopes,eroded f LpE2-Lodo rocky loam,8 to 25 \ / percent slopes,eroded ti f LpF2-Lodo rocky loam,25 to 50 percent slopes,eroded \ f PaA-Pachappa fine sandy loam,0 to 2 percent slopes \ / Ts-Traver fine sandy loam,saline- /f alkali GdC, �� `� .0,Wa-Waukena loamy fine sand,saline- alkali x 1 ► Z�! �/ GdA GtlD2 LpF2 Hnl}2 - GdD2IL SOURCE:Bing Maps 2018;USDA2018 FIGURE 2 DUDEK a S°ect 0 125 250 Feet Biological Resources Letter Report and MSHCP Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project e �►� ,r freA- Q Project•Boundary / ` }• `1 Study Area / Vegetation and Land Cover Type ` DH-Disturbed Habitat DEV-Urban/Developed e Storm Drain ' 1 IDH I I, I I � 1 ' ` - h DEV O / O O, { / %. 'tl 48 ti SOURCE:DigitalGlobe2017 FIGURE 3 u a E © Biological Resources 0 87.5 175 Feet Biological Resources Letter Report and MSHCP Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project .1 A 5 2 23 22 v � ' -, Riverside 1 - County C 1 B 4 le 19 7 +.r 3 p 1 7LLJ J Pro Site 1 I 1 2 -- [- 7 3 JUL ° 18 7 Q Western Riverside MSHCP 0 Cell Groups — E C Proposed Linkages r A ---Constrained Linkage %ram IN,Linkage F •t, Existing Cores and Linkages Constrained Linkage 9 © 7❑ Core 9 1 Imp 24 Linkage 11 12 14 G 'r Noncontiguous Habitat Block 14 Proposed Cores and Habitat Blocks G 1 A M Core M = Proposed Extension of Existing Cores Noncontiguous Habitat Block O SKR HCP Boundary SOURCE:Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority 2018;Riverside County 2018;Shaded Relief 2018 FIGURE 4 u E Nt © MSHCP Overview o a 6 Miles Biological Resources Letter Report and MSHCP Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project r, '� .• EL �06 ►�, '.� '\ I � � 1 i R V 40f . # � r s 't f r r r , • �` , r r \ r � r f - FAA -W s, f O Project Site O Study Area Burrowing owl MSHCP Survey Requirement Areas SOURCE:Riverside County 2018;DigitalGlobe 2016 FIGURE 5 Western Riverside MSHCP Survey Requirements 1 V 1 1'1 1! © o 12s 2eo Biological Resources Letter Report and MSHCP Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project V 11 Feet / • / 406 f / WF Q Project•Boundary t—I Study Area / Vegetation and Land Cover Type ` DH-Disturbed Habitat DEV-Urban/Developed I ` Permanent Impacts ' 1 a Storm Drain ' IDH I 'I I I ' I I DEV O / o 4, SOURCE:DigitalGlobe 2017 FIGURE 6 ❑ U ❑ E K © Impacts 0 87.5 175 Feet Biological Resources Letter Report and MSHCP Consistency for the Penington Industrial Project Attachment B Site Photographs Attachment 8 Site Photos i' y �"s n b Photo 1:View of tilled project site;facing southeast Photo 2:View of tilled project site;facing south from the northern corner of the project site. from the northern corner of the project site. I. 9i q Photo 3:View of tilled project site;facing southeast Photo 4:View of concrete debris pile;facing from the western corner of the project site. southeast in southern corner of the project site. 9124 D U D E K 1 December 2018 Attachment 8 Site Photos AL I' la �r Photo 5: Concrete debris pile in southern corner of Photo 6: Storm drain on project southeastern the project site. boundary. r x xP �f Photo 7:View of tilled project site;facing north in the Photo 8: Concrete debris pile and southeastern central portion of the project site. fence,facing northeast. 9124 D U D E K 2 December 2018 NINNIP0,10- Attachment C Vascular Plant Species Attachment C Plant Compendium VASCULAR SPECIES MONOCOTS CYPERACEAE-SEDGE FAMILY Cyperus eragrostis-tall flatsedge POACEAE- GRASS FAMILY * Bromus madritensis - compact brome EUDICOTS CHENOPODIACEAE- GOOSEFOOT FAMILY * Salsola tragus - Russian thistle GERANIACEAE- GERANIUM FAMILY * Erodium moschatum - musky stork's bill MALVACEAE- MALLOW FAMILY * Malva parviflora - cheeseweed mallow SOLANACEAE- NIGHTSHADE FAMILY Datura wrightii - sacred thorn-apple * signifies introduced (non-native)species 9142 D U D E K c-1 December 2018 Attachment C Plant Compendium INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 9142 D U D E K c-2 December 2018 N41 Attachment D Wildlife Species Attachment D Wildlife Compendium BIRD JAYS, MAGPIES AND CROWS CORVIDAE- CROWS AND JAYS Corvus corax - common raven LARKS ALAUDIDAE- LARKS Eremophila alpestris - horned lark 9142 D U D E K D-1 December 2018 Attachment D Wildlife Compendium INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 9142 D U D E K D-2 December 2018 Attachment E Special-Status Plant Species Detected or Potentially Occurring in the Study Area Attachment E Plant PTO Scientific Name Status Primary Habitat Associations/Life Form/Blooming Period/ Potential to Occur -•- Elevation Abronia villosa var.aurita 7chas sand-verbena None/None/1B.1 None Chaparral,Coastal scrub, Desert dunes;sandy/annual herb/(Jan)Mar- Low potential to occur.The project site is within the Sep/245-5250 appropriate elevation range and contains sandy soils, but does not contain coastal scrub, chaparral, or desert dune vegetation that together form suitable habitat for this species. As the project site appears to have been tilled at the time of the reconnaissance survey, it is possible that one of these vegetation communities would occupy the project site in the absence of regular tilling. Allium munzii Munz's onion FE/ST/1B.1 Narrow Endemic Chaparral,Cismontane woodland, Coastal scrub, Pinyon and juniper Not expected to occur.While the project site is in the Plant Species woodland,Valley and foothill grassland; mesic,clay/perennial bulbiferous appropriate elevation range, it does not contain clay herb/Apr-May/97O-3510 soils to support this species. Almutaster pauciflorus alkali marsh aster None/None/2B.2 None Meadows and seeps;alkaline/perennial herb/June-Oct/785-2625 Not expected to occur.While the project site is in the appropriate elevation range, it does not contain alkaline soils-to support this species. Ambrosia pumila San Diego ambrosia FE/None/1B.1 Narrow Endemic Chaparral,Coastal scrub,Valley and foothill grassland,Vernal pools;sandy Low potential to occur.The project site is within the Plant Species loam or clay,often in disturbed areas,sometimes alkaline/perennial appropriate elevation range and contains sandy loam rhizomatous herb/Apr-Oct/65-1360 soils; however, it does not contain coastal scrub, chaparral,or grassland vegetation that could support this species. However,the project site appears to have been tilled at the time of the reconnaissance survey and it is possible that one of these vegetation communities would occupy the project site in the absence of regular tilling. There are documented occurrences of this species approximately 1.3 miles northwest of the project site(CDFW 2018). Arctostaphylos rainbowensis Rainbow manzanita None/None/1B.1 Covered Chaparral/perennial evergreen shrub/Dec-Mar/67O-2200 Not expected to occur.While the project site is within the appropriate elevation range,this conspicuous, perennial shrub would have been detected during the reconnaissance survey. Atriplex coronata var. notatior San Jacinto Valley FE/None/1B.1 Criteria Area Survey Playas,Valley and foothill grassland (mesic),Vernal pools;alkaline/annual Not expected to occur. While the project site is in the crownscale Plant Species herb/Apr-May/455-1640 appropriate elevation range, it does not contain alkaline soils to support this species.This species is restricted to highly alkaline, silty-clay soils in assocaiton with Traver-Domino-Willows soils which are absent(RCA 2003). Atriplex pacifica South Coast saltscale None/None/1B.2 None Coastal bluff scrub,Coastal dunes,Coastal scrub, Playas/annual Not expected to occur.The project site is outside of the herb/Mar-Oct/O-460 known elevation range forth is species. Atriplex parishii Parish's brittlescale None/None/1B.1 Criteria Area Survey Chenopod scrub, Playas,Vernal pools;alkaline/annual herb/June- Not expected to occur.While the project site is in the Plant Species Oct/8O-6235 appropriate elevation range, it does not contain alkaline soils to support this species.This species is restricted to highly alkaline,silty-clay soils in assocaiton with Traver-Domino-Willows soils which are absent (RCA 2003). 9142 D U D E K E-1 December 2018 Attachment E Plant PTO Scientific Name Status Primary Habitat Associations/Life Form/Blooming Period/ Potential to Occur -•- Elevation Atriplex serenana var. davidsonii Davidson's saltscale None/None/1B.2 Criteria Area Survey Coastal bluff scrub,Coastal scrub;alkaline/annual herb/May-Oct/3O-655 Not expected to occur. While the project site is in the Plant Species appropriate elevation range, it does not contain alkaline soils to support this species.This species is restricted to highly alkaline, silty-clay soils in assocaiton with Traver-Domino-Willows soils which are absent(RCA 2003). Ayenia compacta California ayenia None/None/2B.3 None Mojavean desert scrub,Sonoran desert scrub; rocky/perennial herb/Mar- Not expected to occur.While the project site is within Apr/49O-3595 the appropriate elevation range, it does not contain rocky soils or desert scrub vegetation that could support this species. Brodiaea filifolia thread-leaved brodiaea FT/SE/1B.1 Criteria Area Survey Chaparral (openings),Cismontane woodland,Coastal scrub, Playas,Valley Not expected to occur.While the project site is in the Plant Species and foothill grassland,Vernal pools;often clay/perennial bulbiferous appropriate elevation range, it does not contain clay herb/Mar-June/8O-3675 soils to support this species. Brodiaea orcuttii Orcutt's brodiaea None/None/1B.1 Covered Closed-cone coniferous forest,Chaparral, Cismontane woodland, Meadows Not expected to occur.While the project site is in the and seeps,Valley and foothill grassland,Vernal pools; mesic, appropriate elevation range, it does not contain clay clay/perennial bulbiferous herb/May-July/95-5550 soils to support this species. Brodiaea santarosae Santa Rosa Basalt brodiaea None/None/1B.2 None Valley and foothill grassland; basaltic/perennial bulbiferous herb/May- Not expected to occur.The project site is outside of the June/185O-3430 known elevation range forth is species. Calochortus weedii var, intermedius intermediate mariposa lily None/None/1B.2 Covered Chaparral,Coastal scrub,Valley and foothill grassland; rocky, Not expected to occur.While the project site is within calcareous/perennial bulbiferous herb/May-July/34O-2805 the appropriate elevation range, it does not contain rocky soils to support this species. Centromadia pungens ssp. laevis smooth tarplant None/None/113.1 Criteria Area Survey Chenopod scrub, Meadows and seeps, Playas, Riparian woodland,Valley Low potential to occur.While the project site is in the Plant Species and foothill grassland;alkaline/annual herb/Apr-Nov/0-2100 appropriate elevation range, it does not contain alkaline soils to support this species. However,this species can be associated with disturbed habitat, which is present throughout the project site,and there are numerous documented occurrences of this species within one mile of the project site(CDFW 2018). Chorizanthe parryi var.parryi Parry's spineflower None/None/1B.1 Covered Chaparral,Cismontane woodland, Coastal scrub,Valley and foothill Low potential to occur.The project site is within the grassland;sandy or rocky,openings/annual herb/Apr-June/900-4005 appropriate elevation range and contains sandy soils, but does not contain chaparral,scrub,or grassland vegetation communities.As the project site appears to have been tilled at the time of the reconnaissance survey, it is possible that one of these vegetation communities would occupy the project site in the absence of regular tilling.There is a documented occurrence of this species within one mile of the project site(CDFW 2018). Chorizanthe polygonoides var. longispina long-spined spineflower None/None/113.2 Covered Chaparral,Coastal scrub, Meadows and seeps,Valley and foothill Not expected to occur.While the project site is in the grassland,Vernal pools;often clay/annual herb/Apr-July/95-5020 appropriate elevation range, it does not contain clay soils for this species. Clinopodium chandleri San Miguel savory None/None/1B.2 Narrow Endemic Chaparral,Cismontane woodland, Coastal scrub, Riparian woodland,Valley Not expected to occur.While the project site is in the Plant Species and foothill grassland; Rocky,gabbroic or metavolcanic/perennial appropriate elevation range, it does not contain shrub/Mar-July/39O-3525 gabbroic or metavolanic soils for this species. 9142 D U D E K E-2 December 2018 Attachment E Plant PTO Scientific Name Status Primary Habitat Associations/Life Form/Blooming Period/ Potential to Occur Moo -•- Elevation Comarostaphylis diversifolia ssp. summer holly None/None/1B.2 None Chaparral,Cismontane woodland/perennial evergreen shrub/Apr- Not expected to occur.While the project site is within diversifolia June/95-2590 the appropriate elevation range, it does not contain chaparral or woodland vegetation, nor do historic aerials indicate that these vegetation communities were historically present(Historic Aerials 2018). Dodecahema leptoceras slender-horned spineflower FE/SE/113.1 Narrow Endemic Chaparral, Cismontane woodland, Coastal scrub(alluvial fan); Not expected occur.The project site is within the Plant Species sandy/annual herb/Apr-June/655-2495 appropriate elevation range and contains sandy soils; however,there is no alluvial fan-associated vegetation communities present within the proejct site.As the project site appears to have been tilled at the time of the reconnaissance survey, it is possible that one of these vegetation communities would occupy the project site in the absence of regular tilling; however,a review of historic aerials indicates no alluvial fan vegetation dating back to 1967(Historic Aerials 2018); as such,there has been no suitable habitat that could support this species. Dudleya multicaulis many-stemmed dudleya None/None/1B.2 Narrow Endemic Chaparral,Coastal scrub,Valley and foothill grassland;often clay/perennial Not expected to occur.While the project site is in the Plant Species herb/Apr-July/45-2590 appropriate elevation range, it does not contain clay soils for this species. Dudleya viscida sticky dudleya None/None/1B.2 Covered Coastal bluff scrub,Chaparral,Cismontane woodland, Coastal scrub; Low potential to occur.The project site is within the rocky/perennial herb/May-June/30-1805 appropriate elevation range; however,there is no chaparral,scrub,or grassland vegetation that could support this species.As the project site appears to have been tilled at the time of the reconnaissance survey, it is possible that one of these vegetation communities would occupy the project site in the absence of regular tilling. Eryngium aristulatum var.parishii San Diego button-celery FE/SE/113.1 Covered Coastal scrub,Valley and foothill grassland,Vernal pools; mesic/annual/ Not expected to occur.While the project site is within the perennial herb/Apr-June/65-2035 appropriate elevation range,it does not contain vernal pools or suitable clay soils to support this species. Geothallus tuberosus Campbell's liverwort None/None/1B.1 None Coastal scrub (mesic), Vernal pools; soil/ephemeral Not expected to occur.While the project site is within liverwort/N.A./3O-1970 the appropriate elevation range, it does not contain vernal pool-associated vegetation that could support this species. Hesperocyparis forbesii Tecate cypress None/None/1B.1 None Closed-cone coniferous forest,Chaparral;clay,gabbroic or Not expected to occur.While the project site is in the metavolcanic/perennial evergreen tree/N.A./26O-4920 appropriate elevation range, it does not contain clay soils for this species. Horkelia cuneata var.puberula mesa horkelia None/None/1B.1 None Chaparral (maritime),Cismontane woodland,Coastal scrub;sandy or Low potential to occur.The project site is within the gravelly/perennial herb/Feb-July(Sep)/225-2655 appropriate elevation range and contains sandy soils, but does not contain chaparral,scrub,or woodland vegetation communities.As the project site appears to have been tilled at the time of the reconnaissance survey, it is possible that one of these vegetation communities would occupy the project site in the absence of regular tilling. 9142 D U D E K E-3 December 2018 Attachment E Plant PTO Scientific Name Status Primary Habitat Associations/Life Form/Blooming Period/ Potential to Occur -•- Elevation Juncus luciensis 7Santaia dwarf rush None/None/1B.2 None Chaparral,Great Basin scrub, Lower montane coniferous forest, Meadows Not expected to occur.While the project site is within and seeps,Vernal pools/annual herb/Apr-July/980-6695 the appropriate elevation range, it does not contain vernal pool-associated vegetation or soils that could support this species. Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri Coulter's goldfields None/None/1B.1 Criteria Area Survey Marshes and swamps(coastal salt), Playas,Vernal pools/annual Not expected to occur.While the project site is within Plant Species herb/Feb-June/0-4005 the appropriate elevation range, it does not contain swamp, playa,or vernal pool-associated vegetation that could support this species.This species occurs in assocaiton with Traver-Domino-Willows soils which are absent(RCA 2003). Lepechinia cardiophylla heart-leaved pitcher sage None/None/1B.2 Criteria Area Survey Closed-cone coniferous forest,Chaparral, Cismontane woodland/perennial Not expected to occur.The project site is outside of the Plant Species shrub/Apr-July/1705-4495 known elevation range forth is species. Lilium parryi lemon lily None/None/1B.2 Covered Lower montane coniferous forest, Meadows and seeps, Riparian forest, Not expected to occur.The project site is outside of the Upper montane coniferous forest; mesic/perennial bulbiferous herb/July- known elevation range for this species. Aug/4000-9005 Limnanthes alba ssp,parishii Parish's meadowfoam None/SE/1B.2 Covered Lower montane coniferous forest, Meadows and seeps,Vernal pools; Not expected to occur.The project site is outside of the vernally mesic/annual herb/Apr-June/1965-6560 known elevation range forth is species. Monardella hypoleuca ssp. intermedia intermediate monardella None/None/1B.3 None Chaparral,Cismontane woodland, Lower montane coniferous forest Not expected to occur.The project site is within the (sometimes); Usually understory/perennial rhizomatous herb/Apr- appropriate elevation range; however, it does not Sep/1310-4100 contain chaparral,woodland, or forest vegetation that could support this species, nor do historic aerials indicate that these vegetation communities were historically present(Historic Aerials 2018). Monardella hypoleuca ssp. Janata felt-leaved monardella None/None/1B.2 None Chaparral,Cismontane woodland/perennial rhizomatous herb/June- Not expected to occur.The project site is within the Aug/980-5165 appropriate elevation range; however, it does not contain chaparral or woodland vegetation that could support this species, nor do historic aerials indicate that these vegetation communities were historically present(Historic Aerials 2018). Monardella macrantha ssp, hallii Hall's monardella None/None/1B.3 Covered Broadleafed upland forest,Chaparral,Cismontane woodland, Lower Not expected to occur.The project site is outside of the montane coniferous forest,Valley and foothill grassland/perennial known elevation range forth is species. rhizomatous herb/June-Oct/2395-7200 Navarretia fossalis spreading navarretia FT/None/1B.1 Narrow Endemic Chenopod scrub, Marshes and swamps(assorted shallow freshwater), Not expected to occur.While the project site is within Plant Species Playas,Vernal pools/annual herb/Apr-June/95-2150 the appropriate elevation range, it does not contain scrub,swamp,or vernal pool-associated vegetation or soils that could support this species. Navarretia prostrate prostrate vernal pool None/None/1B.1 Criteria Area Survey Coastal scrub, Meadows and seeps,Valley and foothill grassland (alkaline), Not expected to occur.While the project site is within navarretia Plant Species Vernal pools; Mesic/annual herb/Apr-July/5-3970 the appropriate elevation range, it does not contain alkaline or vernal pool-associated vegetation that could support this species. Nolina cismontana chaparral nolina None/None/1B.2 None Chaparral, Coastal scrub;sandstone or grbbro/perennial evergreen Not expected to occur.While the project site is within shrub/(Mar)May-July/455-4185 the appropriate elevation range,the project site does not contain sandstone or grabbro soils that could support this species. 9142 D U D E K E-4 December 2018 Attachment E Plant PTO Scientific Name Status Primary Habitat Associations/Life Form/Blooming Period/ Potential to Occur -•- Elevation Orcuttia californica California Orcutt grass FE/SE/1B.1 Narrow Endemic Vernal pools/annual herb/Apr-June/45-2165 Not expected to occur.While the project site is within Plant Species the appropriate elevation range, it does not contain vernal pool-associated vegetation or soils that could support this species. Pseudognaphalium leucocephalum white rabbit-tobacco None/None/2B.2 None Chaparral,Cismontane woodland, Coastal scrub, Riparian woodland; Low potential to occur.The project site is within the sandy,gravelly/perennial herb/(July)Aug-Nov(Dec)/0-6890 appropriate elevation range and contains sandy soils, but does not contain chaparral,scrub, woodland,or riparian vegetation communities.As the project site appears to have been tilled at the time of the reconnaissance survey, it is possible that one of these vegetation communities would occupy the project site in the absence of regular tilling.There is a documented occurrence of this species within one mile of the project site(CDFW 2018). Scutellaria bolanderi ssp.austromontana southern mountains None/None/1B.2 None Chaparral,Cismontane woodland, Lower montane coniferous forest; Not expected to occur.The project site is outside of the skullcap mesic/perennial rhizomatous herb/June-Aug/1390-6560 known elevation range for this species. Sibaropsis hammittii Hammitt's clay-cress None/None/1B.2 Narrow Endemic Chaparral (openings),Valley and foothill grassland;clay/annual herb/Mar- Not expected to occur.The project site is outside of the Plant Species Apr/2360-3495 species' known elevation range. Sphaerocarpos drewei bottle liverwort None/None/1B.1 None Chaparral, Coastal scrub; openings, soil/ephemeral Low potential to occur.The project site is within the liverwort/N.A./295-1970 appropriate elevation range; however, it does not contain chaparral or scrub vegetation that could support this species.As the project site appears to have been tilled at the time of the reconnaissance survey, it is possible that one of these vegetation communities would occupy the project site in the absence of regular tilling. Symphyotrichum defoliatum San Bernardino aster None/None/1B.2 None Cismontane woodland,Coastal scrub, Lower montane coniferous forest, Not expected to occur.While the project site is within Meadows and seeps, Marshes and swamps,Valley and foothill grassland the appropriate elevation range, it does not contain (vernally mesic); near ditches,streams,springs/perennial rhizomatous appropriate vernal pool-associated vegetation or soils herb/July-Nov/5-6695 that could support this species. Tetracoccus dioicus Parry's tetracoccus None/None/1B.2 None Chaparral,Coastal scrub/perennial deciduous shrub/Apr-May/540-3280 Low potential to occur.The project site is within the appropriate elevation range; however, it does not contain chaparral or scrub vegetation that could support this species.As the project site appears to have been tilled at the time of the reconnaissance survey, it is possible that one of these vegetation communities would occupy the project site in the absence of regular tilling. Tortula californica California screw-moss None/None/1B.2 None Chenopod scrub, Valley and foothill grassland;sandy, Low potential to occur.The project site is within the soil/moss/N.A./30-4790 appropriate elevation range and contains sandy soils, but does not contain scrub or grassland vegetation communities.As the project site appears to have been tilled at the time of the reconnaissance survey, it is possible that one of these vegetation communities would occupy the project site in the absence of regular tilling. 9142 D U D E K E-5 December 2018 Attachment E Plant PTO Scientific Name Status Primary Habitat Associations/Life Form/Blooming Period/ Potential to Occur -•- • Trichocoronis wrightii var. wrightii Wright7trichocoronis None/None/2B.1 Narrow Endemic Meadows and seeps, Marshes and swamps, Riparian forest,Vernal pools; Not expected to occur.While the project site is in the Plant Species alkaline/annual herb/May appropriate elevation range, it does not contain alkaline soils that could support this species. Viguiera purisimae La Purisima viguiera None/None/2B.3 None Coastal bluff scrub,Chaparral/shrub/Apr-Sep/1195-1395 Low potential to occur.The project site is within the appropriate elevation range; however, it does not contain chaparral or scrub vegetation that could support this species.As the project site appears to have been tilled at the time of the reconnaissance survey, it is possible that one of these vegetation communities would occupy the project site in the absence of regular tilling. 9142 D U D E K E-6 December 2018 N41 Attachment F Special-Status Wildlife Species Detected or Potentially Occurring in the Study Area Appendix F Special Status Wildlife PTO Status Western •- Scientific Name Common Name (Federal/State) MSHCP Potential to Occur Amphibians Anaxyrus californicus arroyo toad FE/SSC Covered Semi-arid areas near washes, sandy riverbanks, riparian areas, palm oasis,Joshua Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and tree, mixed chaparral and sagebrush;stream channels for breeding(typically third surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that order); adjacent stream terraces and uplands for foraging and wintering could support this species. Rana draytonii California red-legged frog FT/SSC Covered Lowland streams, wetlands, riparian woodlands, livestock ponds; dense, shrubby or Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and emergent vegetation associated with deep,still or slow-moving water; uses adjacent surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that uplands could support this species. Spea hammondii western spadefoot None/SSC Covered Primarily grassland and vernal pools, but also in ephemeral wetlands that persist at Not expected to occur.The project site is regularly tilled and least 3 weeks in chaparral, coastal scrub, valley-foothill woodlands, pastures, and surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that other agriculture could support this species. Taricha torosa (Monterey California newt None/SSC Covered Wet forests, oak forests, chaparral, and rolling grassland Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and Co. south only) surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Actinemys marmorata western pond turtle None/SSC Covered Slow-moving permanent or intermittent streams, ponds, small lakes, and reservoirs Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and with emergent basking sites; adjacent uplands used for nesting and during winter surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Arizona elegans California glossy snake None/SSC None Commonly occurs in desert regions throughout southern California. Prefers open Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and occidentalis sandy areas with scattered brush. Also found in rocky areas. surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Aspidoscelis tigris San Diegan tiger whiptail None/SSC Covered Hot and dry areas with sparse foliage, including chaparral, woodland, and riparian Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and stejnegeri areas. surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Crotalus ruber red diamondback None/SSC Covered Coastal scrub, chaparral, oak and pine woodlands, rocky grasslands, cultivated areas, Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and rattlesnake and desert flats surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Phrynosoma blainvillii Blainville's horned lizard None/SSC Covered Open areas of sandy soil in valleys, foothills, and semi-arid mountains including Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and coastal scrub, chaparral, valley-foothill hardwood, conifer, riparian, pine-cypress, surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that juniper, and annual grassland habitats could support this species. Salvadora hexalepis coast patch-nosed snake None/SSC None Brushy or shrubby vegetation; requires small mammal burrows for refuge and Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and virgultea overwintering sites surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Thamnophis hammondii two-striped gartersnake None/SSC None Streams, creeks, pools, streams with rocky beds, ponds, lakes, vernal pools Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Agelaius tricolor(nesting tricolored blackbird BCC/PSE, SSC Covered Nests near freshwater, emergent wetland with cattails or tules, but also in Himalayan Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and colony) blackberrry;forages in grasslands, woodland, and agriculture surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. 9142 D U D E K F-1 December 2018 Appendix F Special Status Wildlife PTO Status Western • Scientific Name Common Name (Federal/State) MSHCP Potential to Occur Aquila chrysaetos golden eagle BCC/FP, WL Covered Nests and winters in hilly, open/semi-open areas, including shrublands, grasslands, Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and (nesting&wintering) pastures, riparian areas, mountainous canyon land, open desert rimrock terrain; surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that nests in large trees and on cliffs in open areas and forages in open habitats could support this species. Asio otus (nesting) long-eared owl None/SSC None Nests in riparian habitat, live oak thickets, other dense stands of trees, edges of Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and coniferous forest;forages in nearby open habitats surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Athene cunicularia burrowing owl BCC/SSC Covered Nests and forages in grassland, open scrub, and agriculture, particularly with ground Low potential to occur.The project site is regularly tilled and (burrow sites&some squirrel burrows surrounded by development. While there are no California ground wintering sites) squirrel burrows, a debris pile located within the project site could act as a burrow surrogate for burrowing owl.Should the project site remain untilled for an extended period,suitable habitat may occur. Buteo swainsoni(nesting) Swainson's hawk BCC/ST Covered Nests in open woodland and savanna, riparian, and in isolated large trees; forages in Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and nearby grasslands and agricultural areas such as wheat and alfalfa fields and pasture surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Charadrius alexandrinus western snowy plover FT, BCC/SSC None On coasts nests on sandy marine and estuarine shores; in the interior nests on sandy, Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and nivosus (nesting) barren or sparsely vegetated flats near saline or alkaline lakes, reservoirs, and ponds surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Coturnicops yellow rail BCC/SSC None Nesting requires wet marsh/sedge meadows or coastal marshes with wet soil and Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and noveboracensis shallow,standing water surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Elanus leucurus (nesting) white-tailed kite None/FP Covered Nests in woodland, riparian, and individual trees near open lands;forages Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and opportunistically in grassland, meadows, scrubs, agriculture, emergent wetland, surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that savanna, and disturbed lands could support this species. Haliaeetus leucocephalus bald eagle FDL, BCC/SE, Covered Nests in forested areas adjacent to large bodies of water, including seacoasts, rivers, Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and (nesting&wintering) FP swamps, large lakes; winters near large bodies of water in lowlands and mountains surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Icteria virens (nesting) yellow-breasted chat None/SSC Covered Nests and forages in dense, relatively wide riparian woodlands and thickets of Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and willows, vine tangles, and dense brush surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Lanius ludovicianus loggerhead shrike BCC/SSC Covered Nests and forages in open habitats with scattered shrubs,trees, or other perches Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and (nesting) surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Polioptila californica coastal California FT/SSC Covered Nests and forages in various sage scrub communities, often dominated by California Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and californica gnatcatcher sagebrush and buckwheat; generally avoids nesting in areas with a slope of greater surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that than 40%; majority of nesting at less than 1,000 feet above mean sea level could support this species. Vireo bellii pusillus least Bell's vireo FE/SE Covered Nests and forages in low, dense riparian thickets along water or along dry parts of Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and (nesting) intermittent streams;forages in riparian and adjacent shrubland late in nesting surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that season could support this species. 9142 D U D E K F-2 December 2018 Appendix F Special Status Wildlife PTO Status Western •- Scientific Name Common Name (Federal/State) MSHCP Potential to Occur Gila orcuttii arroyo chub None/SSC Covered Warm,fluctuating streams with slow-moving or backwater sections of warm to cool Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and streams at depths >40 centimeters (16 inches); substrates of sand or mud surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Chaetodipus californicus Dulzura pocket mouse None/SSC None Open habitat, coastal scrub, chaparral, oak woodland, chamise chaparral, mixed- Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and femoralis conifer habitats; disturbance specialist; 0 to 3,000 feet above mean sea level surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Chaetodipus fallax fallax northwestern San Diego None/SSC Covered Coastal scrub, mixed chaparral, sagebrush, desert wash, desert scrub, desert Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and pocket mouse succulent shrub, pinyon-juniper, and annual grassland surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Dipodomys merriami San Bernardino kangaroo rat FE/SSC Covered Sparse scrub habitat, alluvial scrub/coastal scrub habitats on gravelly and sandy soils Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and parvus near river and stream terraces surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Dipodomys stephensi Stephens' kangaroo rat FE/ST Covered Annual and perennial grassland habitats, coastal scrub or sagebrush with sparse Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and canopy cover, or in disturbed areas surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Eumops perotis western mastiff bat None/SSC None Chaparral, coastal and desert scrub, coniferous and deciduous forest and woodland; Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and californicus roosts in crevices in rocky canyons and cliffs where the canyon or cliff is vertical or surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that nearly vertical,trees, and tunnels could support this species. Lasiurus xanthinus western yellow bat None/SSC None Valley-foothill riparian, desert riparian, desert wash, and palm oasis habitats; below Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and 2,000 feet above mean sea level; roosts in riparian and palms surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Lepus californicus San Diego black-tailed None/SSC Covered Arid habitats with open ground; grasslands, coastal scrub, agriculture, disturbed Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and bennettii jackrabbit areas, and rangelands surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Neotoma lepida San Diego desert woodrat None/SSC Covered Coastal scrub, desert scrub, chaparral, cacti, rocky areas Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and intermedia surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Nyctinomops pocketed free-tailed bat None/SSC None Pinyon-juniper woodlands, desert scrub, desert succulent shrub, desert riparian, Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and femorosaccus desert wash, alkali desert scrub,Joshua tree, and palm oases; roosts in high cliffs or surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that rock outcrops with drop-offs, caverns, and buildings could support this species. Onychomys torridus southern grasshopper None/SSC None Grassland and sparse coastal scrub Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and ramona mouse surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Perognathus Los Angeles pocket mouse None/SSC Covered Lower-elevation grassland, alluvial sage scrub, and coastal scrub Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and longimembris brevinasus surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. Taxidea taxus American badger None/SSC None Dry, open,treeless areas; grasslands, coastal scrub, agriculture, and pastures, Not expected to occur. The project site is regularly tilled and especially with friable soils surrounded by development. It does not contain suitable habitat that could support this species. 9142 D U D E K F-3 December 2018 Appendix F Special Status Wildlife PTO RiversideStatus Western Scientific Name Common Name (Federal/State) MSHCP Potential to Occur Invertebrates Branchinecta lynchi vernal pool fairy shrimp FT/None Covered Vernal pools,seasonally ponded areas within vernal swales, and ephemeral Not expected to occur. The project site contains well-drained soils that freshwater habitats are not associated with vernal pools. Damp soil was observed on the southeastern boundary of the project site during the reconnaissance survey; however,this is believed to be associated with the landscaped development to the southeast. Review of historic aerials does not indicate evidence of ponding within the project site, nor do soil maps indicate soils with water-retaining properties. Branchinecta San Diego fairy shrimp FE/None None Vernal pools, non-vegetated ephemeral pools Not expected to occur. The project site contains well-drained soils that sandiegonensis are not associated with vernal pools. Damp soil was observed on the southeastern boundary of the project site during the reconnaissance survey; however,this is believed to be associated with the landscaped development to the southeast. Review of historic aerials does not indicate evidence of ponding within the project site, nor do soil maps indicate soils with water-retaining properties. Euphydryas editha quino quino checkerspot butterfly FE/None Covered Annual forblands, grassland, open coastal scrub and chaparral; often soils with Not expected to occur. The project site does not contain clay soils or cryptogamic crusts and fine-textured clay; host plants include Plantago erecta, host plants that could support this species. Antirrhinum coulterianum, and Plantago patagonica (Silverado Occurrence Complex) Streptocephalus woottoni Riverside fairy shrimp FE/None Covered Vernal pools, non-vegetated ephemeral pools Not expected to occur. The project site contains well-drained soils that are not associated with vernal pools. Damp soil was observed on the southeastern boundary of the project site during the reconnaissance survey; however,this is believed to be associated with the landscaped development to the southeast. Review of historic aerials does not indicate evidence of ponding within the project site, nor do soil maps indicate soils with water-retaining properties. 9142 D U D E K F-4 December 2018 TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Operational Activities- Emissions(Ibs/day) Summer Scenario VOC NOx CO Sox PM10 PM2.5 Area Source 2.09 2.90E-04 0.03 0.00 1.10E-04 1.10E-04 Energy Source 0.09 0.80 0.67 4.77E-03 0.06 0.06 Mobile Source(Passenger Cars) 1.70 1.46 24.76 0.07 7.42 1.99 Mobile Source(Trucks) 0.55 17.30 3.81 0.06 2.81 1.00 On-Site Equipment 0.14 1.55 0.77 0.00 0.05 0.05 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 4.57 21.10 30.04 0.14 10.34 3.10 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO Operational Activities- Emissions(Ibs/day) Summer Scenario VOC NOx CO Sox PM10 PM2.5 Area Source 2.09 2.90E-04 0.03 0.00 1.10E-04 1.10E-04 Energy Source 0.09 0.80 0.67 4.77E-03 0.06 0.06 Mobile Source(Passenger Cars) 1.51 1.51 20.05 0.06 7.42 1.99 Mobile Source(Trucks) 0.54 18.08 3.69 0.06 2.81 1.00 On-Site Equipment 0.14 1.55 0.77 0.00 0.05 0.05 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 4.37 21.93 25.22 0.14 10.34 3.10 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO TABLE 2: PROJECT GHG EMISSIONS Emission Source Emissions(MT/yr) CO2 CH4 N20 Total CO2e Annual construction-related emissions 17.27 0.00 0.00 17.35 amortized over 30 years Area Source 0.01 2.00E-05 0.00 8.13E-03 Energy Source 460.08 0.02 5.48E-03 462.10 Mobile Source(Passenger Car) 660.74 0.02 0.00 661.13 Mobile Source(Truck) 1,124.14 0.01 0.00 1,124.46 On-Site Equipment 50.84 0.02 0.00 51.25 Waste 22.94 1.36 0.00 56.83 Water Usage 94.13 0.69 0.02 116.44 Total COze(All Sources) 2,489.56 Screening Threshold(CO2e) 10,000 Threshold Exceeded? NO CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars) Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Manufacturing 91.14 + 1000sgft ; 2.09 91,140.00 i 0 ----------- -----------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- ;------------- Other Asphalt Surfaces 32.10 + 1000sgft ; 0.74 32,100.00 -+ 0 -------------- --------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- = — — ;------------- ------- Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 19.80 + 1000sgft ; 0.45 19,798.00 -+ 0 -----------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- --------------}------------------ --------------- Parking Lot 164.00 Space T 1.51 65,600.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.4 Precipitation Freq(Days) 28 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2021 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer Project Characteristics - Land Use-Total Project Area is 4.79 acres. Construction Phase- Operations Run Only. Off-road Equipment- Operations Run Only. Trips and VMT- Operations Run Only. Vehicle Trips -Trip Rates are based on information provided in Focused Traffic Evaluation by Urban Crossroads, Inc. Operational Off-Road Equipment- Based on SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Busniess Survey Results (2014) Fleet Mix- Fleet Mix based on normalization of CaIEEMod defaults between LDA, LDT1, LDT2, and MDV categories. Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstruction Phase NumDays 20.00 1.00 ----------------------------_------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix HHD 0.07 0.00 ---------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LDA ? 0.54 0.61 ---------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t------------------------- tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.04 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LDT2 0.19 0.21 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LHD2 5.1410e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix MY 4.5820e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- tblFleetMix MDV 0.12 0.13 ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ---------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix MH ? 1.0380e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix MHD 0.02 0.00 -----------t---- t-- ---------- ------------ -----------------r 1 0.00 ------003 ---------T----------- ----------- BUS r -----------tblFleetMix ----------�------------ SBUS-------------r 9.4500e-004 ---------T----------- 0.00 ----------- r tblFleetMix UBUS 1.1830e-003 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.48 1.51 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblOffRoad Equipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount } 3.00 0.00 tblOffRoad Equipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount } 2.00 0.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperDaysPerYear } 260.00 365.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperFuelType } Diesel CNG tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperHorsePower } 97.00 200.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperHoursPerDay } 8.00 4.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperOffRoad Equ ipmentN umber } 0.00 1.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.43 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.10 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.28 7.55 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.46 0.36 tblVehicleE F HHD i 1.46 2.9270e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD } 6,485.38 1,409.07 tblVehicleEF HHD } 1,461.92 1,350.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.62 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 26.41 7.34 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.69 3.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.04 0.04 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.8000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF HHD 8.8680e-003 8.8980e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.5000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 8.4000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.5800e-003 1.0300e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.85 0.58 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.8000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.07 0.07 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.8000e-004 5.3700e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 7.1000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 8.4000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.5800e-003 1.0300e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.97 0.66 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.8000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.11 0.09 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.8000e-004 5.3700e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.35 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.10 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.39 7.39 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.46 0.36 tblVehicleE F HHD i 1.39 2.7700e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD 6,867.98 1,402.59 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF HHD 1,461.92 1,350.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.62 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 27.25 7.10 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.54 2.88 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.04 0.04 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.8000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 9.7680e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.03 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 8.8680e-003 8.8980e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.5000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.6300e-004 8.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.9560e-003 1.1800e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.80 0.60 tblVehicleEF HHD i 9.2000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.07 0.07 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.8400e-004 5.5600e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.04 1.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 6.9000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.6300e-004 8.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.9560e-003 1.1800e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.92 0.69 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF HHD 9.2000e-005 4.00OOe-006 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.11 0.09 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.8400e-004 5.5600e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.54 0.03 tblVehicleE F HHD i 0.03 3.2330e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.10 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.51 7.76 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.45 0.32 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.47 2.9120e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD } 5,957.03 1,414.57 tblVehicleEF HHD } 1,461.92 1,340.32 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.62 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 25.25 7.65 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.67 3.02 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.02 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.04 0.04 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.8000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.02 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.03 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 8.8680e-003 8.8710e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.5000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 6.7000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehicleE F HHD 2.7490e-003 1.2100e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF HHD 0.91 0.54 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.1000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.07 0.07 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.9200e-004 5.6500e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 7.1000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 6.7000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.7490e-003 1.2100e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.05 0.62 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.1000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.11 0.08 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.9200e-004 5.6500e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF LDA i 4.0430e-003 2.4680e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 5.4670e-003 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.58 0.66 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.16 2.12 tblVehicleEF LDA i 255.91 265.87 tblVehicleEF LDA i 58.81 54.73 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.05 0.04 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.6140e-003 1.4470e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.2650e-003 1.9190e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.4880e-003 1.3330e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.0830e-003 1.7640e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA 0.05 0.07 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LDA 0.10 0.10 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.01 9.5180e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.07 0.23 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.5630e-003 2.6300e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 6.0800e-004 5.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.05 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.10 0.10 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.08 0.25 tblVehicleEF LDA i 4.5900e-003 2.8100e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 4.7470e-003 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.71 0.81 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.02 1.87 tblVehicleEF LDA i 278.73 289.14 tblVehicleEF LDA i 58.81 54.24 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.05 0.04 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.6140e-003 1.4470e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.2650e-003 1.9190e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.4880e-003 1.3330e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.0830e-003 1.7640e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.10 0.14 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.12 0.12 tblVehicleEF LDA 0.07 0.10 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.06 0.20 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.7930e-003 2.8600e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 6.0500e-004 5.3700e-004 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.10 0.14 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.12 0.12 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.07 0.10 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.07 0.22 tblVehicleEF LDA i 3.8980e-003 2.3810e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 5.6140e-003 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.54 0.62 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.19 2.17 tblVehicleEF LDA i 249.57 259.47 tblVehicleEF LDA i 58.81 54.82 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.05 0.04 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.6140e-003 1.4470e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.2650e-003 1.9190e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.4880e-003 1.3330e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.0830e-003 1.7640e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.06 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.11 0.11 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.03 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 9.8140e-003 9.1880e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.24 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LDA 0.08 0.23 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.4990e-003 2.5670e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 6.0800e-004 5.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.06 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.11 0.11 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.03 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.24 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.08 0.26 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.01 8.0140e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.02 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 1.46 1.62 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 3.40 2.43 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 315.98 317.00 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 72.28 66.64 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.14 0.14 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 2.5300e-003 2.2930e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 3.6970e-003 2.9510e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 2.3290e-003 2.1110e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 3.4000e-003 2.7140e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.21 0.23 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.35 0.27 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.14 0.15 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.03 0.04 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.20 0.87 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.24 0.44 tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.1780e-003 3.1370e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LDT1 7.8300e-004 6.5900e-004 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.21 0.23 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.35 0.27 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.14 0.15 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.20 0.87 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.26 0.48 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.01 9.0560e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.02 0.08 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 1.76 1.96 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 2.99 2.15 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 343.19 341.79 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 72.28 66.01 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.13 0.13 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 2.5300e-003 2.2930e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 3.6970e-003 2.9510e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 2.3290e-003 2.1110e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 3.4000e-003 2.7140e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.41 0.44 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.43 0.34 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.27 0.29 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.03 0.04 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.20 0.88 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.21 0.38 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 3.4550e-003 3.3820e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 7.7500e-004 6.5300e-004 tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.41 0.44 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.43 0.34 ----------------------------Y---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.27 0.29 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.05 0.06 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.20 0.88 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.23 0.42 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.01 7.7080e-003 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.02 0.09 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.37 1.51 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.46 2.48 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 307.88 309.49 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 72.28 66.77 tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.14 0.14 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.5300e-003 2.2930e-003 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.6970e-003 2.9510e-003 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.3290e-003 2.1110e-003 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.4000e-003 2.7140e-003 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.18 0.19 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.39 0.30 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.12 0.13 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 0.03 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.23 1.01 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.25 0.45 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.0960e-003 3.0630e-003 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 7.8400e-004 6.6100e-004 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.18 0.19 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.39 0.30 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.12 0.13 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 0.05 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.23 1.01 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.27 0.50 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 5.6080e-003 4.2470e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 7.2840e-003 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.76 0.98 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.53 2.73 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 355.02 338.79 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 81.24 71.51 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.08 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.6030e-003 1.4980e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 2.3320e-003 1.9580e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.4740e-003 1.3790e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 2.1450e-003 1.8010e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.11 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.12 0.14 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.44 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.33 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 3.5560e-003 3.3520e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 8.3800e-004 7.0800e-004 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.11 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.12 0.14 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.06 0.44 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.11 0.37 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 6.3630e-003 4.8280e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 6.3270e-003 0.06 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.93 1.20 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.35 2.42 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 386.34 362.86 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 81.24 70.86 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.08 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.6030e-003 1.4980e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 2.3320e-003 1.9580e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.4740e-003 1.3790e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 2.1450e-003 1.8010e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.22 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.17 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.17 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.44 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.09 0.29 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 3.8710e-003 3.5900e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 8.3500e-004 7.0100e-004 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.22 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.17 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.17 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.44 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.09 0.32 tblVehicleEF LDT2 5.3900e-003 4.0760e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LDT2 7.4940e-003 0.07 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.71 0.91 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.57 2.80 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 345.65 331.49 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 81.24 71.65 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.08 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.6030e-003 1.4980e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 2.3320e-003 1.9580e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.4740e-003 1.3790e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 2.1450e-003 1.8010e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.13 0.15 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.05 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.51 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.34 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 3.4620e-003 3.2800e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 8.3900e-004 7.0900e-004 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.13 0.15 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.05 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.51 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.11 0.38 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 5.4460e-003 4.8820e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 5.3310e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.15 0.17 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.96 0.72 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.41 0.96 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.26 9.44 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 607.95 639.95 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 30.36 10.54 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.09 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.21 1.60 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.7200e-004 9.7000e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 8.7100e-004 2.3300e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-004 9.2800e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.5390e-003 2.5010e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 8.0100e-004 2.1400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.8710e-003 3.1780e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 1.9010e-003 1.5570e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.08 0.06 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.31 0.50 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.26 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-005 9.1000e-005 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 5.9620e-003 6.2250e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.4900e-004 1.0400e-004 ---------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------ tblVehicleE F LHD1 3.8710e-003 3.1780e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 0.08 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 1.9010e-003 1.5570e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.07 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.31 0.50 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.28 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 5.4460e-003 4.8940e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 5.4200e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.15 0.17 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.97 0.73 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.29 0.92 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.26 9.44 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 607.95 639.97 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 30.36 10.46 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.09 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.08 1.51 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.7200e-004 9.7000e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 8.7100e-004 2.3300e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-004 9.2800e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.5390e-003 2.5010e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 8.0100e-004 2.1400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 7.2450e-003 5.9530e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.12 0.09 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.6380e-003 2.9980e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.08 0.06 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.32 0.50 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.25 0.07 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-005 9.1000e-005 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 5.9620e-003 6.2250e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.4700e-004 1.0300e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 7.2450e-003 5.9530e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.12 0.09 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.6380e-003 2.9980e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.32 0.50 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.27 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 5.4460e-003 4.8810e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 5.3180e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.15 0.17 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.96 0.72 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.41 0.96 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.26 9.44 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 607.95 639.95 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 30.36 10.54 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.09 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.18 1.59 tblVehicleE F LHD1 9.7200e-004 9.7000e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 8.7100e-004 2.3300e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-004 9.2800e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.5390e-003 2.5010e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 8.0100e-004 2.1400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.4570e-003 2.8250e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.11 0.09 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 1.7350e-003 1.4150e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.08 0.06 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.33 0.53 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.26 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-005 9.1000e-005 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 5.9620e-003 6.2250e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.4900e-004 1.0400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.4570e-003 2.8250e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.11 0.09 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 1.7350e-003 1.4150e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.07 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.33 0.53 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.28 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.6660e-003 3.1720e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 4.5290e-003 3.8570e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.3110e-003 9.0280e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.12 0.13 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.50 0.53 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.15 0.56 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 14.48 14.86 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 604.20 638.83 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 23.56 7.29 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.12 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.71 1.77 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.3360e-003 1.4390e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.8700e-004 1.1400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.2780e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.6970e-003 2.7110e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.5600e-004 1.0500e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.4980e-003 1.6870e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.04 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 7.7800e-004 8.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.11 0.04 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.4100e-004 1.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 5.8740e-003 6.1550e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.5700e-004 7.2000e-005 ---------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------ tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.4980e-003 1.6870e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.04 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 7.7800e-004 8.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.07 0.07 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.05 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.6660e-003 3.1790e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 4.5800e-003 3.8860e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 8.0210e-003 8.7250e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.13 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.51 0.53 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.10 0.53 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 14.48 14.86 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 604.20 638.83 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 23.56 7.25 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.12 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.62 1.67 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.3360e-003 1.4390e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.8700e-004 1.1400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.2780e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.6970e-003 2.7110e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.5600e-004 1.0500e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.8320e-003 3.1830e-003 ---------------------------- ------------------------- ---------------- ---------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.05 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.02 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.4720e-003 1.6130e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.11 0.04 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.4100e-004 1.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 5.8740e-003 6.1560e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.5600e-004 7.2000e-005 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.8320e-003 3.1830e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.4720e-003 1.6130e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.07 0.07 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.05 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.6660e-003 3.1700e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 4.5170e-003 3.8490e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 8.3600e-003 9.0930e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.13 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.50 0.53 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.16 0.56 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 14.48 14.86 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 604.20 638.83 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 23.56 7.30 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.12 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.70 1.75 tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.3360e-003 1.4390e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.8700e-004 1.1400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.2780e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.6970e-003 2.7110e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.5600e-004 1.0500e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.1910e-003 1.3290e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 6.6000e-004 7.0100e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.27 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.11 0.04 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.4100e-004 1.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 5.8740e-003 6.1550e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.5700e-004 7.2000e-005 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.1910e-003 1.3290e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 6.6000e-004 7.0100e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.07 0.07 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.27 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.05 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.42 0.32 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.15 0.24 tblVehicleEF MY 19.52 19.61 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MY 9.67 8.55 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MY i 165.74 208.30 tblVehicleEF MY i 46.23 60.73 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.13 1.13 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.7750e-003 1.7570e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.4010e-003 2.8660e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.6600e-003 1.6440e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.2060e-003 2.7000e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.69 1.66 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.85 0.84 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.92 0.90 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.15 2.16 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.57 1.87 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.08 1.83 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.0380e-003 2.0610e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 6.8100e-004 6.0100e-004 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.69 1.66 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.85 0.84 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.92 0.90 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.65 2.65 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.57 1.87 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.26 1.99 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.42 0.32 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.14 0.22 tblVehicleEF MY i 20.23 20.27 tblVehicleEF MY i 9.11 8.00 tblVehicleEF MY 165.74 209.26 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MY 46.23 59.19 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MY i 0.98 0.98 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.7750e-003 1.7570e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.4010e-003 2.8660e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.6600e-003 1.6440e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.2060e-003 2.7000e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.35 3.28 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.24 1.23 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.10 2.05 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.13 2.13 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.57 1.86 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.86 1.63 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.0490e-003 2.0710e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 6.6500e-004 5.8600e-004 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.35 3.28 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.24 1.23 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.10 2.05 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.62 2.63 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.57 1.86 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.02 1.77 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.42 0.32 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.15 0.24 tblVehicleEF MY i 19.04 19.14 tblVehicleEF MY i 9.62 8.49 tblVehicleEF MY i 165.74 207.52 tblVehicleEF MY i 46.23 60.64 tblVehicleEF MY 1.12 1.12 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MY 1.7750e-003 1.7570e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MY i 3.4010e-003 2.8660e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.6600e-003 1.6440e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.2060e-003 2.7000e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.60 1.59 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.05 1.04 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.74 0.73 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.15 2.15 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.65 2.12 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.08 1.83 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.0310e-003 2.0540e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 6.8100e-004 6.00OOe-004 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.60 1.59 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.05 1.04 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.74 0.73 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.64 2.65 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.65 2.12 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.27 1.99 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.01 5.7580e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.02 0.09 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.42 1.20 tblVehicleEF MDV i 3.18 3.27 tblVehicleEF MDV i 488.89 421.49 tblVehicleEF MDV i 110.15 88.73 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.17 0.12 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.7110e-003 1.5730e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV 2.4630e-003 2.0550e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MDV 1.5780e-003 1.4510e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MDV i 2.2660e-003 1.8910e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.11 0.13 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.20 0.17 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.09 0.11 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.03 0.03 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.25 0.45 tblVehicleEF MDV i 4.9000e-003 4.1680e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.1570e-003 8.7800e-004 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.11 0.13 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.20 0.17 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.09 0.11 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.05 0.04 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.27 0.49 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.01 6.5120e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.02 0.08 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.73 1.46 tblVehicleEF MDV i 2.81 2.88 tblVehicleEF MDV i 530.71 447.07 tblVehicleEF MDV i 110.15 87.92 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.16 0.11 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.7110e-003 1.5730e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 2.4630e-003 2.0550e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.5780e-003 1.4510e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV 2.2660e-003 1.8910e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MDV 0.22 0.26 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.23 0.20 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.17 0.21 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.04 0.03 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.21 0.39 tblVehicleEF MDV i 5.3230e-003 4.4210e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.1510e-003 8.7000e-004 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.22 0.26 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.23 0.20 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.17 0.21 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.05 0.04 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.23 0.43 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.01 5.5370e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.02 0.09 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.33 1.12 tblVehicleEF MDV i 3.24 3.34 tblVehicleEF MDV i 476.42 413.84 tblVehicleEF MDV i 110.15 88.88 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.16 0.12 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.7110e-003 1.5730e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 2.4630e-003 2.0550e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.5780e-003 1.4510e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 2.2660e-003 1.8910e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.09 0.10 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.21 0.18 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MDV 0.08 0.10 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.13 0.57 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.25 0.46 tblVehicleEF MDV i 4.7750e-003 4.0920e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.1590e-003 8.8000e-004 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.09 0.10 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.21 0.18 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.08 0.10 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.05 0.03 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.13 0.57 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.28 0.50 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 3.3370e-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 2.70 0.34 tblVehicleEF MH i 5.98 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH } 1,002.10 941.76 tblVehicleEF MH i 57.67 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.67 4.43 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.0860e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 3.2460e-003 4.00OOe-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehicleEF MH i 9.9800e-004 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.56 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 0.08 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MH 0.54 0.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MH i 0.09 0.07 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.35 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 9.9460e-003 8.9030e-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 6.8100e-004 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.56 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.08 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.54 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.13 0.08 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.39 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 3.3370e-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.02 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 2.78 0.34 tblVehicleEF MH i 5.56 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH } 1,002.10 941.76 tblVehicleEF MH i 57.67 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.55 4.18 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.0860e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 3.2460e-003 4.00OOe-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehicleEF MH i 9.980Oe-004 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 2.87 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 0.10 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MH 1.06 0.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MH i 0.10 0.07 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.34 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 9.9470e-003 8.9030e-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 6.7400e-004 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 2.87 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.10 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.06 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.13 0.08 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.37 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 3.3370e-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 2.70 0.34 tblVehicleEF MH i 6.02 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH } 1,002.10 941.76 tblVehicleEF MH i 57.67 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.65 4.38 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.0860e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 3.2460e-003 4.00OOe-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehicleEF MH i 9.9800e-004 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.58 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 0.10 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MH 0.53 0.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MH i 0.09 0.07 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.35 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 9.9460e-003 8.9030e-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 6.8200e-004 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.58 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.10 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.53 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.13 0.08 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.39 0.00 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 3.1500e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 3.7220e-003 5.9790e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.06 8.4870e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.35 0.34 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.28 0.57 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.06 1.01 tblVehicleEF MHD i 151.96 74.93 tblVehicleEF MHD } 1,066.63 1,001.03 tblVehicleEF MHD i 55.49 8.18 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.65 0.69 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.99 2.37 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.0680e-003 2.4180e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.4490e-003 0.08 tblVehicleEF MHD i 7.8800e-004 9.6000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD 1.0220e-003 2.3130e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MHD 6.1670e-003 0.08 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MHD i 7.2400e-004 8.8000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.7450e-003 7.1900e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.05 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 8.5800e-004 3.5500e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.03 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 0.10 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.37 0.05 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.4610e-003 7.1000e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.01 9.5290e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.6100e-004 8.1000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.7450e-003 7.1900e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.05 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.04 0.03 tblVehicleEF MHD i 8.5800e-004 3.5500e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.04 0.12 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 0.10 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.40 0.05 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 2.9880e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 3.7740e-003 6.0080e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.05 8.2030e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.26 0.28 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.28 0.57 tblVehicleEF MHD i 5.78 0.96 tblVehicleEF MHD i 160.96 76.44 tblVehicleEF MHD 1,066.63 1,001.04 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MHD 55.49 8.10 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.67 0.70 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.93 2.23 tblVehicleEF MHD i 9.00OOe-004 2.0410e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.4490e-003 0.08 tblVehicleEF MHD i 7.8800e-004 9.6000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 8.6100e-004 1.9530e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.1670e-003 0.08 tblVehicleEF MHD i 7.2400e-004 8.8000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 3.3760e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.06 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.6840e-003 7.0100e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.03 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.36 0.04 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.5460e-003 7.2500e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.01 9.5290e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.5600e-004 8.00OOe-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 3.3760e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.06 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.04 0.03 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.6840e-003 7.0100e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.04 0.12 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.39 0.05 tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 3.3820e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MHD 3.6890e-003 5.9600e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.06 8.5610e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.49 0.43 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.27 0.57 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.14 1.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 139.53 72.84 tblVehicleEF MHD } 1,066.63 1,001.03 tblVehicleEF MHD i 55.49 8.20 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.62 0.67 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.98 2.35 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.2990e-003 2.9380e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.4490e-003 0.08 tblVehicleEF MHD i 7.8800e-004 9.6000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.2430e-003 2.8110e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.1670e-003 0.08 tblVehicleEF MHD i 7.2400e-004 8.8000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.3320e-003 5.6300e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.05 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.7900e-004 2.8800e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.03 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.37 0.05 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.3440e-003 6.9100e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.01 9.5290e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.6300e-004 8.1000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD 1.3320e-003 5.6300e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.04 0.03 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.7900e-004 2.8800e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.04 0.12 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.41 0.05 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.01 8.9240e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.0950e-003 8.5070e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.27 0.50 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.54 0.93 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 6.17 2.58 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 75.04 73.28 tblVehicleEF OBUS } 1,098.07 1,407.22 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 70.10 20.86 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.35 0.44 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.12 1.70 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.2100e-004 1.7750e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 6.0450e-003 0.04 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.2300e-004 1.9000e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.1600e-004 1.6990e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 5.7680e-003 0.04 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 7.5700e-004 1.7400e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 2.1800e-003 2.5990e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.3000e-004 1.1120e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.09 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.39 0.12 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 7.2800e-004 6.9900e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.0900e-004 2.0600e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 2.1800e-003 2.5990e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.07 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 9.3000e-004 1.1120e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.11 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.42 0.14 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.01 8.9470e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.2540e-003 8.6370e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.26 0.48 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.55 0.94 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 5.76 2.41 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 78.48 73.81 tblVehicleEF OBUS } 1,098.07 1,407.25 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 70.10 20.57 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.36 0.45 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.04 1.59 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.0200e-004 1.5000e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 6.0450e-003 0.04 tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.2300e-004 1.9000e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.8000e-005 1.4350e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF OBUS i 5.7680e-003 0.04 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 7.5700e-004 1.7400e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 4.0690e-003 4.7330e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.7890e-003 2.1320e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.04 0.09 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.37 0.12 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 7.6100e-004 7.0400e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.0200e-004 2.0400e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 4.0690e-003 4.7330e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.07 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.7890e-003 2.1320e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.11 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.40 0.13 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.01 8.9200e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.0660e-003 8.4690e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.28 0.53 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.54 0.92 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 6.22 2.60 tblVehicleEF OBUS 70.30 72.56 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,098.07 1,407.21 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF OBUS i 70.10 20.90 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.34 0.44 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.11 1.68 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.4700e-004 2.1560e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 6.0450e-003 0.04 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.2300e-004 1.9000e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.4100e-004 2.0620e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 5.7680e-003 0.04 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 7.5700e-004 1.7400e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.8870e-003 2.3830e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.5400e-004 1.0620e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.04 0.09 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.27 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.39 0.13 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 6.8300e-004 6.9200e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.1000e-004 2.0700e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.8870e-003 2.3830e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.07 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.5400e-004 1.0620e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.11 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.27 tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.42 0.14 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.84 0.08 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 6.6110e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.06 6.9670e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 7.83 3.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.64 0.53 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 6.66 0.94 tblVehicleEF SBUS } 1,146.29 366.87 tblVehicleEF SBUS } 1,103.40 1,115.27 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 53.92 6.06 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 10.00 3.57 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.65 4.82 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 4.0660e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 0.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.5700e-004 4.00OOe-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 3.890Oe-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.6950e-003 2.651Oe-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.200Oe-004 3.600Oe-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.6830e-003 1.3080e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 8.6250e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.94 0.36 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.1770e-003 6.250Oe-004 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.11 0.10 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.37 0.04 tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 3.5040e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF SBUS i 6.5500e-004 6.00OOe-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.6830e-003 1.3080e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 8.6250e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 1.35 0.52 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.1770e-003 6.2500e-004 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.13 0.11 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.40 0.04 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.84 0.08 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 6.6860e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.05 5.8380e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 7.71 2.99 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.65 0.54 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.83 0.68 tblVehicleEF SBUS } 1,198.60 377.09 tblVehicleEF SBUS } 1,103.40 1,115.28 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 53.92 5.63 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 10.32 3.66 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.37 4.53 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 9.1190e-003 3.4340e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 0.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.5700e-004 4.00OOe-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 8.7240e-003 3.2850e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.6950e-003 2.6510e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.03 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.2000e-004 3.6000e-005 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF SBUS i 8.4640e-003 2.3620e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 9.1440e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.93 0.36 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.0830e-003 1.1650e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.11 0.10 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.31 0.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 3.6000e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 6.2400e-004 5.6000e-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 8.4640e-003 2.3620e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 9.1440e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 1.35 0.52 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.0830e-003 1.1650e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.13 0.11 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.34 0.04 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.84 0.08 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 6.6040e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.07 7.2110e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 8.00 3.09 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.63 0.53 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 7.02 0.98 tblVehicleEF SBUS } 1,074.07 352.76 tblVehicleEF SBUS } 1,103.40 1,115.26 ---------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------------------ -------------------------- tblVehicleEF SBUS 53.92 6.14 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.56 3.44 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.60 4.78 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 4.9380e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 0.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.5700e-004 4.00OOe-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 4.7240e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.6950e-003 2.6510e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.2000e-004 3.6000e-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.1680e-003 1.1480e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 8.8290e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.94 0.36 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.1000e-003 6.0300e-004 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.11 0.10 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.02 0.06 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.38 0.04 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 3.3710e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 6.6100e-004 6.1000e-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.1680e-003 1.1480e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 8.8290e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 1.35 0.52 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.1000e-003 6.0300e-004 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.13 0.11 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.02 0.06 tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.41 0.05 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.51 3.35 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.09 0.02 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 8.45 26.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 15.26 1.50 tblVehicleEF UBUS } 1,822.40 1,617.71 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 153.45 18.08 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.95 0.32 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.50 0.09 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.06 2.9340e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.4200e-003 1.6100e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.21 0.04 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 3.00OOe-003 5.4780e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.05 2.7920e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.3060e-003 1.4800e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 9.7430e-003 1.6370e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.11 9.7740e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.7860e-003 7.1300e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.52 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.17 0.07 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 9.9960e-003 4.8690e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.8100e-003 1.7900e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 9.7430e-003 1.6370e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.11 9.7740e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.7860e-003 7.1300e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.08 3.43 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 45 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.05 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.28 0.08 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.52 3.35 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.08 0.02 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 8.53 26.06 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 13.06 1.28 tblVehicleEF UBUS } 1,822.40 1,617.72 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 153.45 17.70 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.62 0.31 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.50 0.09 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.06 2.9340e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.4200e-003 1.6100e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.21 0.04 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 3.00OOe-003 5.4780e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.05 2.7920e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.3060e-003 1.4800e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.02 2.9250e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.14 0.01 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 9.6600e-003 1.4550e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.53 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.06 0.07 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 9.9970e-003 4.8690e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.7720e-003 1.7500e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.02 2.9250e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.14 0.01 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 46 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF UBUS 9.6600e-003 1.4550e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF UBUS i 2.09 3.43 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.17 0.07 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.51 3.35 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.09 0.02 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 8.44 26.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 15.44 1.49 tblVehicleEF UBUS } 1,822.40 1,617.71 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 153.45 18.06 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.92 0.31 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.50 0.09 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.06 2.9340e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.4200e-003 1.6100e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.21 0.04 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 3.00OOe-003 5.4780e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.05 2.7920e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.3060e-003 1.4800e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 8.9770e-003 1.7200e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.13 0.01 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.3820e-003 7.5400e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.52 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.03 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.18 0.07 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 9.9960e-003 4.8690e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.8130e-003 1.7900e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 47 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF UBUS 8.9770e-003 1.7200e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.13 0.01 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.3820e-003 7.5400e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 2.08 3.43 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.03 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.29 0.08 tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP } 28.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP } 13.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP } 59.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips DV_TP } 5.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP } 3.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 92.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR } 1.49 6.42 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 0.62 5.09 -------------------------- ------------------------------:------------------------------ -------------------------- tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.82 3.16 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 48 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Year lb/day lb/day 2020 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0. 0000 0.0000 0.0 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 11 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Year lb/day lb/day 2020 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 49 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 2.0896 i 2.9000e- i 0.0315 i 0.0000 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- i i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 i 1.8000e- 0.0717 i 004 i i 004 i 004 i i 004 004 004 ----------- ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- --------------- ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- Energy •i 0.0875 i 0.7954 i 0.6681 4.7700e- 0.0605 i 0.0605 i i 0.0605 0.0605 i 954.4363 954.4363 i 0.0183 0.0175 T 960.1080 003 i i i i i i i i 1 --- ------- ---------------_---- --i------- -------�-------j-------- ------- Mobile •i 1.7010 i 1.4577 i 24.7450 � 0.0703 i 7.3791 i 0.0349 i 7.4140 i 1.9561 i 0.0322 � 1.9883 � i 7,102.145 i 7,102.145 i 0.1564 7,106.055 2 1 2 1 i i 2 -------------------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j---------------_------- -------j--------j-------i-------*------- Offroad i 0.1367 i 1.5461 i 0.7740 � 3.1700e- i i 0.0522 i 0.0522 i i 0.0480 0.0480 � i 307.0801 i 307.0801 i 0.0993 309.5630 003 Total 4.0147 3.7995 26.2186 0.0782 7.3791 0.1477 7.5268 1.9561 0.1407 2.0969 8,363.728 8,363.728 0.2742 0.0175 8,375.797 8 8 9 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 50 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 2.0896 i 2.9000e- 0.0315 i 0.0000 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- i 0.0672 � 0.0672 i 1.8000e- 0.0717 004 004 004 004 004 ; 004 i Energy •i 0.0875 i 0.7954 0.6681 i 4.7700e- 0.0605 i 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 i 954.4363 954.4363 i 0.0183 0.0175 960.1080 003 Mobile •i 1.7010 i 1.4577 24.7450 i 0.0703 7.3791 0.0349 i 7.4140 1.9561 i 0.0322 1.9883 i 7,102.145 7,102.145 i 0.1564 7,106.055 2 i 2 i i 2 Offroad •i 0.1367 i 1.5461 0.7740 i 3.1700e- 0.0522 i 0.0522 0.0480 0.0480 i 307.0801 307.0801 i 0.0993 309.5630 003 Total 4.0147 3.7995 26.2186 0.0782 7.3791 0.1477 7.5268 1.9561 0.1407 2.0969 8,363.728 8,363.728 0.2742 0.0175 8,375.797 8 8 9 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 ;Demolition *Demolition :1/6/2020 1/6/2020 5' 1. Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 51 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer Acres of Paving: 2.7 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating—sgft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 01 8.001 81, 0.73 ---------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------ -------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators ; 01 8.001 158, 0.38 Demolition -Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00: 247: 0.40 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 0. 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00,LD Mix HDT Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 52 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I i 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 =00000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day I I I I I I I I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;� I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • � 1 1 I I •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I r I 1 1 II 0.0000Vendo 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I • 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Worker •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I 17.1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 53 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I i 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 =00000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day I I I I I I I I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;� I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • � 1 1 I I •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I r I 1 1 II 0.0000Vendo 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I • 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Worker •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I 17.1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 54 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated �� 1.7010 i 1.4577 i 24.7450 0.0703 i 7.3791 0.0349 7.4140 i 1.9561 0.0322 1.9883 � i 7,102.145 7,102.145 0.1564 i i 7,106.055 i i i i i i i i 2 i 2 i i i 2 Unmitigated 1.7010 1.4577 24.7450 0.0703 7.3791 0.0349 7.4140 1.9561 0.0322 1.9883 7,102.145 7,102.145 0.1564 7,106.055 2 2 2 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Manufacturing ; 288.00 ; 585.12 463.90 2,148,534 2,148,534 ......................................-------------------------T------------ ------------------------:-------------------------- Other Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 ................................................... ---------- ----------- ---------------------- ------------------------r Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 ......................................------------ -r----------- ---------- ---------------------- ----------------------- Parking Lot ; 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 288.00 585.12 463.90 2,148,534 2,148,534 4.3 Trip Type Information CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 55 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Manufacturing 16.60 8.40 6.90 100.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 ........................------------------__ __ ___ _ -- ---- ------------- Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 ? 6.90 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0 0 0 .......................r----------------------- -------- --------- -------- ----------------- Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Manufacturing 0.614000i 0.043000; 0.210000; 0.133000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000- 0.000000 i i---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------t---------------t---------------i---------------i----------------i----------------i---------------- -------- Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.5421161 0.0375781 0.1852031 0.1185031 0.0162411 0.0051411 0.0173921 0.0686951 0.0013831 0.0011831 0.0045821 0.000945. 0.001038 i i i---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------t---------------i---------------i---------------i----------------i----------------i---------------- -------- OtherNon-AsphaltSurfaces 0.5421161 0.0375781 0.1852031 0.1185031 0.0162411 0.0051411 0.0173921 0.0686951 0.0013831 0.0011831 0.0045821 0.000945, 0.001038 i i i i i Parking Lot 0.542116. 0.037578, 0.185203, 0.118503, 0.016241, 0.005141, 0.017392, 0.068695, 0.001383, 0.001183, 0.004582, 0.000945, 0.001038 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 56 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas •i 0.0875 i 0.7954 i 0.6681 i 4.7700e- i i 0.0605 0.0605 i i 0.0605 0.0605 954.4363 954.4363 � 0.0183 i 0.0175 � 960.1080 Mitigated ;i 003 NaturalGas 0.0875 0.7954 0.6681 4.7700e- - 0.0605 • 0.0605 - 0.0605 0.0605 954.4363 • 954.4363 0.0183 0.0175 960.1080 Unmitigated 003 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Manufacturing � 8112.71 4 0.0875 i 0.7954 0.6681 4.7700e- 0.0605 i 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 954.4363 954.4363 i 0.0183 i 0.0175 i 960.1080 003 �� ------- -------'------- ------- ------- ------- -------'--------------- ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- Other Asphalt 0 -1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces Other Non- 0 ■1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces Parking Lot 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0875 0.7954 0.6681 4.7700e- 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 954.4363 954.4363 0.0183 0.0175 960.1080 11 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 57 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Manufacturing 8.11271 •i 0.0875 i 0.7954 � 0.6681 4.7700e- 0.0605 i 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 i 954.4363 954.4363 i 0.0183 i 0.0175 960.1080 003 ---------- ------- -------'------- ------- ------- ------- -------'-------- -- ------- ------- ------- Other Asphalt i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Surfaces Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces Parking Lot i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0875 0.7954 0.6681 4.7700e- 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 0.077 954.4363 954.4363 0.0183 0.0175 960.1080 003 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 58 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 2.0896 i 2.9000e- i 0.0315 i 0.0000 i i 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- i i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 � 0.0672 i 1.8000e- � i 0.0717 •� 004 004 004 004 004 . 004 i ••____-��--------------+__......------}....------....}----._...._.__+......------..}..------......+__._....---------------------}----._......--*-''---- ____•__ -----------------------------}____......_.__----------------____.. Unmitigated 2.0896 2.9000e- 0.0315 0.0000 - 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 - 1.8000e- 0.0717 004 004 004 004 004 004 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 0.2404 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating -----------%------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- --------------- -------I------- ------- ------- -------*------- Consumer •i 1.8462 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � i � 0.0000 i � i 0.0000 Products Landscaping •i 2.9400e- i 2.9000e- 0.0315 i 0.0000 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 i 1.8000e- 0.0717 003 004 004 004 004 004 004 i Total 2.0896 2.9000e- 0.0315 0.0000 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 1.8000e- 0.0717 004 004 004 004 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 59 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 0.2404 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •1 1.8462 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping •i 2.9400e- i 2.9000e- � 0.0315 i 0.0000 i � 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- � i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- � i 0.0672 � 0.0672 i 1.8000e- � � 0.0717 003 004 004 004 004 004 004 i Total 2.0896 2.9000e- 0.0315 0.0000 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 1.8000e- 0.0717 004 004 004 004 004 004 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1• 4.00, 365, 200, 0.37-CNG CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 60 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:50 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer UnMitigated/Mitigated ROG NOx I CO S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Equipment Type lb/day lb/day Tractors/Loaders/•i 0.1367 1.5461 i 0.7740 3.1700e- 0.0522 i 0.0522 0.0480 0.0480 307.0801 307.0801 0.0993 309.5630 Backhoes •� 003 Total 0.1367 1.5461 0.7740 3.1700e- 0.0522 0.0522 0.0480 0.0480 307.0801 307.0801 0.0993 309.5630 003 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars) Riverside-South Coast County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Manufacturing 91.14 + 1000sgft ; 2.09 91,140.00 i 0 ----------- -----------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- ;------------- Other Asphalt Surfaces 32.10 + 1000sgft ; 0.74 32,100.00 -+ 0 -------------- --------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- = — — ;------------- ------- Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 19.80 + 1000sgft ; 0.45 19,798.00 -+ 0 -----------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- --------------}------------------ --------------- Parking Lot 164.00 Space T 1.51 65,600.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.4 Precipitation Freq(Days) 28 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2021 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter Project Characteristics - Land Use-Total Project Area is 4.79 acres. Construction Phase- Operations Run Only. Off-road Equipment- Operations Run Only. Trips and VMT- Operations Run Only. Vehicle Trips -Trip Rates are based on information provided in Focused Traffic Evaluation by Urban Crossroads, Inc. Operational Off-Road Equipment- Based on SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Busniess Survey Results (2014) Fleet Mix- Fleet Mix based on normalization of CaIEEMod defaults between LDA, LDT1, LDT2, and MDV categories. Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstruction Phase NumDays 20.00 1.00 ----------------------------_------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix HHD 0.07 0.00 ---------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LDA ? 0.54 0.61 ---------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t------------------------- tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.04 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LDT2 0.19 0.21 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LHD2 5.1410e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix MY 4.5820e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- tblFleetMix MDV 0.12 0.13 ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ---------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix MH ? 1.0380e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix MHD 0.02 0.00 -----------t---- t-- ---------- ------------ -----------------r 1 0.00 ------003 ---------T----------- ----------- BUS r -----------tblFleetMix ----------�------------ SBUS-------------r 9.4500e-004 ---------T----------- 0.00 ----------- r tblFleetMix UBUS 1.1830e-003 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.48 1.51 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblOffRoad Equipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount } 3.00 0.00 tblOffRoad Equipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount } 2.00 0.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperDaysPerYear } 260.00 365.00 tblOperationalOffRoad Equipment OperFuelType } Diesel CNG tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperHorsePower } 97.00 200.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperHoursPerDay } 8.00 4.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperOffRoad Equ ipmentN umber } 0.00 1.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.43 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.10 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.28 7.55 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.46 0.36 tblVehicleE F HHD i 1.46 2.9270e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD } 6,485.38 1,409.07 tblVehicleEF HHD } 1,461.92 1,350.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.62 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 26.41 7.34 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.69 3.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.04 0.04 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.8000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF HHD 8.8680e-003 8.8980e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.5000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 8.4000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.5800e-003 1.0300e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.85 0.58 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.8000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.07 0.07 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.8000e-004 5.3700e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 7.1000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 8.4000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.5800e-003 1.0300e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.97 0.66 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.8000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.11 0.09 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.8000e-004 5.3700e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.35 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.10 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.39 7.39 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.46 0.36 tblVehicleE F HHD i 1.39 2.7700e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD 6,867.98 1,402.59 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF HHD 1,461.92 1,350.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.62 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 27.25 7.10 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.54 2.88 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.04 0.04 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.8000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 9.7680e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.03 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 8.8680e-003 8.8980e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.5000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.6300e-004 8.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.9560e-003 1.1800e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.80 0.60 tblVehicleEF HHD i 9.2000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.07 0.07 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.8400e-004 5.5600e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.04 1.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 6.9000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.6300e-004 8.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.9560e-003 1.1800e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.92 0.69 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF HHD 9.2000e-005 4.00OOe-006 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.11 0.09 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.8400e-004 5.5600e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.54 0.03 tblVehicleE F HHD i 0.03 3.2330e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.10 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.51 7.76 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.45 0.32 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.47 2.9120e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD } 5,957.03 1,414.57 tblVehicleEF HHD } 1,461.92 1,340.32 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.62 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 25.25 7.65 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.67 3.02 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.02 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.04 0.04 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.8000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.02 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.03 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 8.8680e-003 8.8710e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.5000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 6.7000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehicleE F HHD 2.7490e-003 1.2100e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF HHD 0.91 0.54 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.1000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.07 0.07 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.9200e-004 5.6500e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 7.1000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 6.7000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.7490e-003 1.2100e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.05 0.62 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.1000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.11 0.08 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.9200e-004 5.6500e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF LDA i 4.0430e-003 2.4680e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 5.4670e-003 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.58 0.66 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.16 2.12 tblVehicleEF LDA i 255.91 265.87 tblVehicleEF LDA i 58.81 54.73 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.05 0.04 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.6140e-003 1.4470e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.2650e-003 1.9190e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.4880e-003 1.3330e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.0830e-003 1.7640e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA 0.05 0.07 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LDA 0.10 0.10 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.01 9.5180e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.07 0.23 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.5630e-003 2.6300e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 6.0800e-004 5.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.05 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.10 0.10 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.08 0.25 tblVehicleEF LDA i 4.5900e-003 2.8100e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 4.7470e-003 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.71 0.81 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.02 1.87 tblVehicleEF LDA i 278.73 289.14 tblVehicleEF LDA i 58.81 54.24 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.05 0.04 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.6140e-003 1.4470e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.2650e-003 1.9190e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.4880e-003 1.3330e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.0830e-003 1.7640e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.10 0.14 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.12 0.12 tblVehicleEF LDA 0.07 0.10 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.06 0.20 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.7930e-003 2.8600e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 6.0500e-004 5.3700e-004 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.10 0.14 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.12 0.12 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.07 0.10 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.07 0.22 tblVehicleEF LDA i 3.8980e-003 2.3810e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 5.6140e-003 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.54 0.62 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.19 2.17 tblVehicleEF LDA i 249.57 259.47 tblVehicleEF LDA i 58.81 54.82 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.05 0.04 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.6140e-003 1.4470e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.2650e-003 1.9190e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.4880e-003 1.3330e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.0830e-003 1.7640e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.06 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.11 0.11 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.03 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 9.8140e-003 9.1880e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.24 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LDA 0.08 0.23 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.4990e-003 2.5670e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 6.0800e-004 5.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.06 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.11 0.11 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.03 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.24 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.08 0.26 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.01 8.0140e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.02 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 1.46 1.62 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 3.40 2.43 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 315.98 317.00 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 72.28 66.64 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.14 0.14 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 2.5300e-003 2.2930e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 3.6970e-003 2.9510e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 2.3290e-003 2.1110e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 3.4000e-003 2.7140e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.21 0.23 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.35 0.27 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.14 0.15 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.03 0.04 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.20 0.87 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.24 0.44 tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.1780e-003 3.1370e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LDT1 7.8300e-004 6.5900e-004 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.21 0.23 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.35 0.27 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.14 0.15 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.20 0.87 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.26 0.48 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.01 9.0560e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.02 0.08 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 1.76 1.96 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 2.99 2.15 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 343.19 341.79 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 72.28 66.01 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.13 0.13 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 2.5300e-003 2.2930e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 3.6970e-003 2.9510e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 2.3290e-003 2.1110e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 3.4000e-003 2.7140e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.41 0.44 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.43 0.34 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.27 0.29 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.03 0.04 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.20 0.88 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.21 0.38 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 3.4550e-003 3.3820e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 7.7500e-004 6.5300e-004 tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.41 0.44 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.43 0.34 ----------------------------Y---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.27 0.29 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.05 0.06 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.20 0.88 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.23 0.42 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.01 7.7080e-003 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.02 0.09 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.37 1.51 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.46 2.48 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 307.88 309.49 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 72.28 66.77 tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.14 0.14 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.5300e-003 2.2930e-003 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.6970e-003 2.9510e-003 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.3290e-003 2.1110e-003 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.4000e-003 2.7140e-003 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.18 0.19 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.39 0.30 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.12 0.13 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 0.03 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.23 1.01 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.25 0.45 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.0960e-003 3.0630e-003 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 7.8400e-004 6.6100e-004 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.18 0.19 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.39 0.30 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.12 0.13 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 0.05 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.23 1.01 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.27 0.50 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 5.6080e-003 4.2470e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 7.2840e-003 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.76 0.98 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.53 2.73 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 355.02 338.79 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 81.24 71.51 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.08 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.6030e-003 1.4980e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 2.3320e-003 1.9580e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.4740e-003 1.3790e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 2.1450e-003 1.8010e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.11 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.12 0.14 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.44 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.33 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 3.5560e-003 3.3520e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 8.3800e-004 7.0800e-004 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.11 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.12 0.14 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.06 0.44 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.11 0.37 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 6.3630e-003 4.8280e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 6.3270e-003 0.06 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.93 1.20 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.35 2.42 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 386.34 362.86 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 81.24 70.86 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.08 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.6030e-003 1.4980e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 2.3320e-003 1.9580e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.4740e-003 1.3790e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 2.1450e-003 1.8010e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.22 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.17 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.17 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.44 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.09 0.29 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 3.8710e-003 3.5900e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 8.3500e-004 7.0100e-004 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.22 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.17 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.17 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.44 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.09 0.32 tblVehicleEF LDT2 5.3900e-003 4.0760e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LDT2 7.4940e-003 0.07 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.71 0.91 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.57 2.80 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 345.65 331.49 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 81.24 71.65 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.08 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.6030e-003 1.4980e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 2.3320e-003 1.9580e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.4740e-003 1.3790e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 2.1450e-003 1.8010e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.13 0.15 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.05 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.51 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.34 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 3.4620e-003 3.2800e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 8.3900e-004 7.0900e-004 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.13 0.15 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.05 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.51 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.11 0.38 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 5.4460e-003 4.8820e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 5.3310e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.15 0.17 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.96 0.72 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.41 0.96 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.26 9.44 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 607.95 639.95 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 30.36 10.54 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.09 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.21 1.60 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.7200e-004 9.7000e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 8.7100e-004 2.3300e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-004 9.2800e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.5390e-003 2.5010e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 8.0100e-004 2.1400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.8710e-003 3.1780e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 1.9010e-003 1.5570e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.08 0.06 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.31 0.50 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.26 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-005 9.1000e-005 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 5.9620e-003 6.2250e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.4900e-004 1.0400e-004 ---------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------ tblVehicleE F LHD1 3.8710e-003 3.1780e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 0.08 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 1.9010e-003 1.5570e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.07 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.31 0.50 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.28 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 5.4460e-003 4.8940e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 5.4200e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.15 0.17 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.97 0.73 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.29 0.92 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.26 9.44 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 607.95 639.97 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 30.36 10.46 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.09 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.08 1.51 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.7200e-004 9.7000e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 8.7100e-004 2.3300e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-004 9.2800e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.5390e-003 2.5010e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 8.0100e-004 2.1400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 7.2450e-003 5.9530e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.12 0.09 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.6380e-003 2.9980e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.08 0.06 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.32 0.50 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.25 0.07 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-005 9.1000e-005 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 5.9620e-003 6.2250e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.4700e-004 1.0300e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 7.2450e-003 5.9530e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.12 0.09 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.6380e-003 2.9980e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.32 0.50 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.27 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 5.4460e-003 4.8810e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 5.3180e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.15 0.17 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.96 0.72 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.41 0.96 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.26 9.44 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 607.95 639.95 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 30.36 10.54 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.09 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.18 1.59 tblVehicleE F LHD1 9.7200e-004 9.7000e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 8.7100e-004 2.3300e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-004 9.2800e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.5390e-003 2.5010e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 8.0100e-004 2.1400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.4570e-003 2.8250e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.11 0.09 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 1.7350e-003 1.4150e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.08 0.06 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.33 0.53 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.26 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-005 9.1000e-005 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 5.9620e-003 6.2250e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.4900e-004 1.0400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.4570e-003 2.8250e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.11 0.09 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 1.7350e-003 1.4150e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.07 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.33 0.53 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.28 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.6660e-003 3.1720e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 4.5290e-003 3.8570e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.3110e-003 9.0280e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.12 0.13 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.50 0.53 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.15 0.56 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 14.48 14.86 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 604.20 638.83 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 23.56 7.29 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.12 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.71 1.77 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.3360e-003 1.4390e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.8700e-004 1.1400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.2780e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.6970e-003 2.7110e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.5600e-004 1.0500e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.4980e-003 1.6870e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.04 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 7.7800e-004 8.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.11 0.04 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.4100e-004 1.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 5.8740e-003 6.1550e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.5700e-004 7.2000e-005 ---------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------ tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.4980e-003 1.6870e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.04 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 7.7800e-004 8.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.07 0.07 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.05 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.6660e-003 3.1790e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 4.5800e-003 3.8860e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 8.0210e-003 8.7250e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.13 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.51 0.53 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.10 0.53 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 14.48 14.86 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 604.20 638.83 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 23.56 7.25 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.12 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.62 1.67 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.3360e-003 1.4390e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.8700e-004 1.1400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.2780e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.6970e-003 2.7110e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.5600e-004 1.0500e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.8320e-003 3.1830e-003 ---------------------------- ------------------------- ---------------- ---------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.05 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.02 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.4720e-003 1.6130e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.11 0.04 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.4100e-004 1.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 5.8740e-003 6.1560e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.5600e-004 7.2000e-005 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.8320e-003 3.1830e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.4720e-003 1.6130e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.07 0.07 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.05 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.6660e-003 3.1700e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 4.5170e-003 3.8490e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 8.3600e-003 9.0930e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.13 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.50 0.53 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.16 0.56 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 14.48 14.86 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 604.20 638.83 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 23.56 7.30 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.12 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.70 1.75 tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.3360e-003 1.4390e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.8700e-004 1.1400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.2780e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.6970e-003 2.7110e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.5600e-004 1.0500e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.1910e-003 1.3290e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 6.6000e-004 7.0100e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.27 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.11 0.04 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.4100e-004 1.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 5.8740e-003 6.1550e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.5700e-004 7.2000e-005 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.1910e-003 1.3290e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 6.6000e-004 7.0100e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.07 0.07 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.27 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.05 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.42 0.32 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.15 0.24 tblVehicleEF MY 19.52 19.61 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MY 9.67 8.55 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MY i 165.74 208.30 tblVehicleEF MY i 46.23 60.73 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.13 1.13 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.7750e-003 1.7570e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.4010e-003 2.8660e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.6600e-003 1.6440e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.2060e-003 2.7000e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.69 1.66 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.85 0.84 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.92 0.90 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.15 2.16 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.57 1.87 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.08 1.83 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.0380e-003 2.0610e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 6.8100e-004 6.0100e-004 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.69 1.66 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.85 0.84 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.92 0.90 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.65 2.65 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.57 1.87 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.26 1.99 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.42 0.32 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.14 0.22 tblVehicleEF MY i 20.23 20.27 tblVehicleEF MY i 9.11 8.00 tblVehicleEF MY 165.74 209.26 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MY 46.23 59.19 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MY i 0.98 0.98 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.7750e-003 1.7570e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.4010e-003 2.8660e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.6600e-003 1.6440e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.2060e-003 2.7000e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.35 3.28 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.24 1.23 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.10 2.05 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.13 2.13 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.57 1.86 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.86 1.63 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.0490e-003 2.0710e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 6.6500e-004 5.8600e-004 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.35 3.28 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.24 1.23 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.10 2.05 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.62 2.63 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.57 1.86 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.02 1.77 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.42 0.32 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.15 0.24 tblVehicleEF MY i 19.04 19.14 tblVehicleEF MY i 9.62 8.49 tblVehicleEF MY i 165.74 207.52 tblVehicleEF MY i 46.23 60.64 tblVehicleEF MY 1.12 1.12 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MY 1.7750e-003 1.7570e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MY i 3.4010e-003 2.8660e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.6600e-003 1.6440e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.2060e-003 2.7000e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.60 1.59 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.05 1.04 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.74 0.73 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.15 2.15 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.65 2.12 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.08 1.83 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.0310e-003 2.0540e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 6.8100e-004 6.00OOe-004 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.60 1.59 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.05 1.04 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.74 0.73 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.64 2.65 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.65 2.12 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.27 1.99 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.01 5.7580e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.02 0.09 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.42 1.20 tblVehicleEF MDV i 3.18 3.27 tblVehicleEF MDV i 488.89 421.49 tblVehicleEF MDV i 110.15 88.73 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.17 0.12 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.7110e-003 1.5730e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV 2.4630e-003 2.0550e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MDV 1.5780e-003 1.4510e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MDV i 2.2660e-003 1.8910e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.11 0.13 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.20 0.17 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.09 0.11 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.03 0.03 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.25 0.45 tblVehicleEF MDV i 4.9000e-003 4.1680e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.1570e-003 8.7800e-004 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.11 0.13 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.20 0.17 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.09 0.11 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.05 0.04 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.27 0.49 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.01 6.5120e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.02 0.08 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.73 1.46 tblVehicleEF MDV i 2.81 2.88 tblVehicleEF MDV i 530.71 447.07 tblVehicleEF MDV i 110.15 87.92 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.16 0.11 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.7110e-003 1.5730e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 2.4630e-003 2.0550e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.5780e-003 1.4510e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV 2.2660e-003 1.8910e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MDV 0.22 0.26 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.23 0.20 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.17 0.21 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.04 0.03 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.21 0.39 tblVehicleEF MDV i 5.3230e-003 4.4210e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.1510e-003 8.7000e-004 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.22 0.26 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.23 0.20 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.17 0.21 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.05 0.04 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.23 0.43 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.01 5.5370e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.02 0.09 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.33 1.12 tblVehicleEF MDV i 3.24 3.34 tblVehicleEF MDV i 476.42 413.84 tblVehicleEF MDV i 110.15 88.88 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.16 0.12 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.7110e-003 1.5730e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 2.4630e-003 2.0550e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.5780e-003 1.4510e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 2.2660e-003 1.8910e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.09 0.10 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.21 0.18 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MDV 0.08 0.10 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.13 0.57 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.25 0.46 tblVehicleEF MDV i 4.7750e-003 4.0920e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.1590e-003 8.8000e-004 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.09 0.10 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.21 0.18 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.08 0.10 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.05 0.03 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.13 0.57 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.28 0.50 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 3.3370e-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 2.70 0.34 tblVehicleEF MH i 5.98 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH } 1,002.10 941.76 tblVehicleEF MH i 57.67 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.67 4.43 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.0860e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 3.2460e-003 4.00OOe-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehicleEF MH i 9.9800e-004 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.56 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 0.08 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MH 0.54 0.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MH i 0.09 0.07 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.35 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 9.9460e-003 8.9030e-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 6.8100e-004 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.56 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.08 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.54 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.13 0.08 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.39 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 3.3370e-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.02 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 2.78 0.34 tblVehicleEF MH i 5.56 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH } 1,002.10 941.76 tblVehicleEF MH i 57.67 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.55 4.18 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.0860e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 3.2460e-003 4.00OOe-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehicleEF MH i 9.980Oe-004 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 2.87 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 0.10 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MH 1.06 0.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MH i 0.10 0.07 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.34 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 9.9470e-003 8.9030e-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 6.7400e-004 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 2.87 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.10 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.06 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.13 0.08 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.37 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 3.3370e-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 2.70 0.34 tblVehicleEF MH i 6.02 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH } 1,002.10 941.76 tblVehicleEF MH i 57.67 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.65 4.38 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.0860e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 3.2460e-003 4.00OOe-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehicleEF MH i 9.9800e-004 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.58 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 0.10 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MH 0.53 0.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MH i 0.09 0.07 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.35 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 9.9460e-003 8.9030e-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 6.8200e-004 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.58 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.10 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.53 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.13 0.08 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.39 0.00 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 3.1500e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 3.7220e-003 5.9790e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.06 8.4870e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.35 0.34 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.28 0.57 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.06 1.01 tblVehicleEF MHD i 151.96 74.93 tblVehicleEF MHD } 1,066.63 1,001.03 tblVehicleEF MHD i 55.49 8.18 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.65 0.69 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.99 2.37 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.0680e-003 2.4180e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.4490e-003 0.08 tblVehicleEF MHD i 7.8800e-004 9.6000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD 1.0220e-003 2.3130e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MHD 6.1670e-003 0.08 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MHD i 7.2400e-004 8.8000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.7450e-003 7.1900e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.05 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 8.5800e-004 3.5500e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.03 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 0.10 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.37 0.05 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.4610e-003 7.1000e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.01 9.5290e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.6100e-004 8.1000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.7450e-003 7.1900e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.05 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.04 0.03 tblVehicleEF MHD i 8.5800e-004 3.5500e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.04 0.12 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 0.10 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.40 0.05 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 2.9880e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 3.7740e-003 6.0080e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.05 8.2030e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.26 0.28 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.28 0.57 tblVehicleEF MHD i 5.78 0.96 tblVehicleEF MHD i 160.96 76.44 tblVehicleEF MHD 1,066.63 1,001.04 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MHD 55.49 8.10 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.67 0.70 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.93 2.23 tblVehicleEF MHD i 9.00OOe-004 2.0410e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.4490e-003 0.08 tblVehicleEF MHD i 7.8800e-004 9.6000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 8.6100e-004 1.9530e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.1670e-003 0.08 tblVehicleEF MHD i 7.2400e-004 8.8000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 3.3760e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.06 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.6840e-003 7.0100e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.03 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.36 0.04 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.5460e-003 7.2500e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.01 9.5290e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.5600e-004 8.00OOe-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 3.3760e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.06 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.04 0.03 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.6840e-003 7.0100e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.04 0.12 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.39 0.05 tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 3.3820e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MHD 3.6890e-003 5.9600e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.06 8.5610e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.49 0.43 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.27 0.57 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.14 1.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 139.53 72.84 tblVehicleEF MHD } 1,066.63 1,001.03 tblVehicleEF MHD i 55.49 8.20 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.62 0.67 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.98 2.35 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.2990e-003 2.9380e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.4490e-003 0.08 tblVehicleEF MHD i 7.8800e-004 9.6000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.2430e-003 2.8110e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.1670e-003 0.08 tblVehicleEF MHD i 7.2400e-004 8.8000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.3320e-003 5.6300e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.05 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.7900e-004 2.8800e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.03 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.37 0.05 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.3440e-003 6.9100e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.01 9.5290e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.6300e-004 8.1000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD 1.3320e-003 5.6300e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.04 0.03 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.7900e-004 2.8800e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.04 0.12 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.41 0.05 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.01 8.9240e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.0950e-003 8.5070e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.27 0.50 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.54 0.93 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 6.17 2.58 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 75.04 73.28 tblVehicleEF OBUS } 1,098.07 1,407.22 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 70.10 20.86 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.35 0.44 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.12 1.70 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.2100e-004 1.7750e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 6.0450e-003 0.04 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.2300e-004 1.9000e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.1600e-004 1.6990e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 5.7680e-003 0.04 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 7.5700e-004 1.7400e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 2.1800e-003 2.5990e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.3000e-004 1.1120e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.09 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.39 0.12 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 7.2800e-004 6.9900e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.0900e-004 2.0600e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 2.1800e-003 2.5990e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.07 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 9.3000e-004 1.1120e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.11 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.42 0.14 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.01 8.9470e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.2540e-003 8.6370e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.26 0.48 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.55 0.94 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 5.76 2.41 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 78.48 73.81 tblVehicleEF OBUS } 1,098.07 1,407.25 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 70.10 20.57 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.36 0.45 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.04 1.59 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.0200e-004 1.5000e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 6.0450e-003 0.04 tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.2300e-004 1.9000e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.8000e-005 1.4350e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF OBUS i 5.7680e-003 0.04 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 7.5700e-004 1.7400e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 4.0690e-003 4.7330e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.7890e-003 2.1320e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.04 0.09 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.37 0.12 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 7.6100e-004 7.0400e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.0200e-004 2.0400e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 4.0690e-003 4.7330e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.07 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.7890e-003 2.1320e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.11 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.40 0.13 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.01 8.9200e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.0660e-003 8.4690e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.28 0.53 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.54 0.92 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 6.22 2.60 tblVehicleEF OBUS 70.30 72.56 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,098.07 1,407.21 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF OBUS i 70.10 20.90 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.34 0.44 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.11 1.68 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.4700e-004 2.1560e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 6.0450e-003 0.04 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.2300e-004 1.9000e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.4100e-004 2.0620e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 5.7680e-003 0.04 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 7.5700e-004 1.7400e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.8870e-003 2.3830e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.5400e-004 1.0620e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.04 0.09 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.27 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.39 0.13 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 6.8300e-004 6.9200e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.1000e-004 2.0700e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.8870e-003 2.3830e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.07 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.5400e-004 1.0620e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.11 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.27 tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.42 0.14 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.84 0.08 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 6.6110e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.06 6.9670e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 7.83 3.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.64 0.53 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 6.66 0.94 tblVehicleEF SBUS } 1,146.29 366.87 tblVehicleEF SBUS } 1,103.40 1,115.27 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 53.92 6.06 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 10.00 3.57 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.65 4.82 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 4.0660e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 0.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.5700e-004 4.00OOe-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 3.890Oe-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.6950e-003 2.651Oe-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.200Oe-004 3.600Oe-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.6830e-003 1.3080e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 8.6250e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.94 0.36 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.1770e-003 6.250Oe-004 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.11 0.10 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.37 0.04 tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 3.5040e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF SBUS i 6.5500e-004 6.00OOe-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.6830e-003 1.3080e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 8.6250e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 1.35 0.52 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.1770e-003 6.2500e-004 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.13 0.11 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.40 0.04 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.84 0.08 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 6.6860e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.05 5.8380e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 7.71 2.99 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.65 0.54 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.83 0.68 tblVehicleEF SBUS } 1,198.60 377.09 tblVehicleEF SBUS } 1,103.40 1,115.28 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 53.92 5.63 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 10.32 3.66 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.37 4.53 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 9.1190e-003 3.4340e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 0.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.5700e-004 4.00OOe-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 8.7240e-003 3.2850e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.6950e-003 2.6510e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.03 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.2000e-004 3.6000e-005 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF SBUS i 8.4640e-003 2.3620e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 9.1440e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.93 0.36 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.0830e-003 1.1650e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.11 0.10 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.31 0.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 3.6000e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 6.2400e-004 5.6000e-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 8.4640e-003 2.3620e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 9.1440e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 1.35 0.52 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.0830e-003 1.1650e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.13 0.11 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.34 0.04 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.84 0.08 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 6.6040e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.07 7.2110e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 8.00 3.09 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.63 0.53 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 7.02 0.98 tblVehicleEF SBUS } 1,074.07 352.76 tblVehicleEF SBUS } 1,103.40 1,115.26 ---------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------------------ -------------------------- tblVehicleEF SBUS 53.92 6.14 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.56 3.44 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.60 4.78 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 4.9380e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 0.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.5700e-004 4.00OOe-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 4.7240e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.6950e-003 2.6510e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.2000e-004 3.6000e-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.1680e-003 1.1480e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 8.8290e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.94 0.36 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.1000e-003 6.0300e-004 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.11 0.10 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.02 0.06 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.38 0.04 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 3.3710e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 6.6100e-004 6.1000e-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.1680e-003 1.1480e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 8.8290e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 1.35 0.52 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.1000e-003 6.0300e-004 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.13 0.11 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.02 0.06 tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.41 0.05 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.51 3.35 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.09 0.02 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 8.45 26.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 15.26 1.50 tblVehicleEF UBUS } 1,822.40 1,617.71 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 153.45 18.08 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.95 0.32 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.50 0.09 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.06 2.9340e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.4200e-003 1.6100e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.21 0.04 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 3.00OOe-003 5.4780e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.05 2.7920e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.3060e-003 1.4800e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 9.7430e-003 1.6370e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.11 9.7740e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.7860e-003 7.1300e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.52 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.17 0.07 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 9.9960e-003 4.8690e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.8100e-003 1.7900e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 9.7430e-003 1.6370e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.11 9.7740e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.7860e-003 7.1300e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.08 3.43 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 45 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.05 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.28 0.08 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.52 3.35 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.08 0.02 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 8.53 26.06 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 13.06 1.28 tblVehicleEF UBUS } 1,822.40 1,617.72 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 153.45 17.70 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.62 0.31 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.50 0.09 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.06 2.9340e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.4200e-003 1.6100e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.21 0.04 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 3.00OOe-003 5.4780e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.05 2.7920e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.3060e-003 1.4800e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.02 2.9250e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.14 0.01 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 9.6600e-003 1.4550e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.53 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.06 0.07 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 9.9970e-003 4.8690e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.7720e-003 1.7500e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.02 2.9250e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.14 0.01 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 46 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF UBUS 9.6600e-003 1.4550e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF UBUS i 2.09 3.43 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.17 0.07 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.51 3.35 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.09 0.02 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 8.44 26.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 15.44 1.49 tblVehicleEF UBUS } 1,822.40 1,617.71 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 153.45 18.06 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.92 0.31 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.50 0.09 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.06 2.9340e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.4200e-003 1.6100e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.21 0.04 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 3.00OOe-003 5.4780e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.05 2.7920e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.3060e-003 1.4800e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 8.9770e-003 1.7200e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.13 0.01 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.3820e-003 7.5400e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.52 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.03 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.18 0.07 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 9.9960e-003 4.8690e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.8130e-003 1.7900e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 47 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF UBUS 8.9770e-003 1.7200e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.13 0.01 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.3820e-003 7.5400e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 2.08 3.43 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.03 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.29 0.08 tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP } 28.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP } 13.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP } 59.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips DV_TP } 5.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP } 3.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 92.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR } 1.49 6.42 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 0.62 5.09 -------------------------- ------------------------------:------------------------------ -------------------------- tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.82 3.16 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 48 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Year lb/day lb/day 2020 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0. 0000 0.0000 0.0 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 11 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year lb/day lb/day 2020 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 49 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 2.0896 i 2.9000e- i 0.0315 i 0.0000 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- i i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 i 1.8000e- 0.0717 i 004 004 i 004 i i 004 004 � i � i 004 � ------ ----- � ------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j--------------- ------I-------j-------j-------I------- Energy •i 0.0875 i 0.7954 i 0.6681 i 4.7700e- 0.0605 i 0.0605 i i 0.0605 0.0605 i 954.4363 : 954.4363 i 0.0183 0.0175 960.1080 003 -- -�------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- --------------- --- -- ------- ------- -------�------ - Mobile •i 1.5091 i 1.5091 i 20.0390 i 0.0638 7.3791 0.0349 i 7.4140 i 1.9561 i 0.0322 1.9883 i 6,447.463 i 6,447.463 i 0.1550 1 1 6,451.339 1 i 1 i i i 2 ----- -----��------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ---------------_------- ------- -------�-------�--------------- Offroad i 0.1367 i 1.5461 i 0.7740 � 3.1700e- i i 0.0522 i 0.0522 i i 0.0480 0.0480 � i 307.0801 i 307.0801 i 0.0993 309.5630 003 Total 3.8228 3.8508 21.5126 0.0717 7.3791 0.1477 7.5268 1.9561 0.1407 2.0969 7,709.046 17709.046 0.2728 1 0.0175 7,721.081 7 7 9 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 50 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 2.0896 i 2.9000e- 0.0315 i 0.0000 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- i 0.0672 � 0.0672 i 1.8000e- 0.0717 004 004 004 004 004 ; 004 i Energy •i 0.0875 i 0.7954 0.6681 i 4.7700e- 0.0605 i 0.0605 i 0.0605 0.0605 i 954.4363 954.4363 i 0.0183 0.0175 960.1080 003 Mobile •i 1.5091 i 1.5091 20.0390 i 0.0638 7.3791 0.0349 i 7.4140 1.9561 i 0.0322 1.9883 i 6,447.463 6,447.463 i 0.1550 6,451.339 ------------------- ------- --------------- ------- ------- -------j------------------------ ---- --j--------J-------j-------* Offroad •i 0.1367 i 1.5461 0.7740 i 3.1700e- 0.0522 i 0.0522 0.0480 0.0480 i 307.0801 307.0801 i 0.0993 309.5630 003 Total 3.8228 3.8508 21.5126 0.0717 7.3791 0.1477 7.5268 1.9561 0.1407 2.0969 7,709.046 7,709.046 0.2728 0.0175 7,721.081 7 7 9 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 ;Demolition *Demolition :1/6/2020 1/6/2020 5' 1. Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 51 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter Acres of Paving: 2.7 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating—sgft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; OE 8.001 81, 0.73 ---------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------ -------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators ; 01 8.001 158, 0.38 Demolition -Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00: 247: 0.40 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 0. 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00,LD Mix HDT Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 52 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I i 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 =00000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day I I I I I I I I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;� I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • � 1 1 I I •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I r I 1 1 II 0.0000Vendo 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I • 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Worker •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I 17.1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 53 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I i 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 =00000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day I I I I I I I I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;� I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • � 1 1 I I •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I r I 1 1 II 0.0000Vendo 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I • 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Worker •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I 17.1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 54 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated �� 1.5091 i 1.5091 i 20.0390 0.0638 i 7.3791 0.0349 7.4140 i 1.9561 0.0322 1.9883 � i 6,447.463 6,447.463 0.1550 i i 6,451.339 i i i i i i i i 1 i 1 i i i 2 Unmitigated 1.5091 1.5091 20.0390 0.0638 7.3791 0.0349 7.4140 1.9561 0.0322 1.9883 6,447.463 6,447.463 0.1550 6,451.339 1 1 2 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Manufacturing ; 288.00 ; 585.12 463.90 2,148,534 2,148,534 ......................................-------------------------T------------ ------------------------:-------------------------- Other Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 ................................................... ---------- ----------- ---------------------- ------------------------r Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 ......................................------------ -r----------- ---------- ---------------------- ----------------------- Parking Lot ; 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 288.00 585.12 463.90 2,148,534 2,148,534 4.3 Trip Type Information CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 55 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Manufacturing 16.60 8.40 6.90 100.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 ........................------------------__ __ ___ _ -- ---- ------------- Other Non Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 ? 6.90 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0 0 0 .......................r----------------------- -------- --------- -------- ----------------- Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Manufacturing 0.614000i 0.043000; 0.210000; 0.133000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000- 0.000000 i i---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------t---------------t---------------i---------------i----------------i----------------i---------------- -------- Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.5421161 0.0375781 0.1852031 0.1185031 0.0162411 0.0051411 0.0173921 0.0686951 0.0013831 0.0011831 0.0045821 0.000945. 0.001038 i i i---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------t---------------i---------------i---------------i----------------i----------------i---------------- -------- OtherNon-AsphaltSurfaces 0.5421161 0.0375781 0.1852031 0.1185031 0.0162411 0.0051411 0.0173921 0.0686951 0.0013831 0.0011831 0.0045821 0.000945, 0.001038 i i i i i Parking Lot 0.542116. 0.037578, 0.185203, 0.118503, 0.016241, 0.005141, 0.017392, 0.068695, 0.001383, 0.001183, 0.004582, 0.000945, 0.001038 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 56 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas •i 0.0875 i 0.7954 i 0.6681 i 4.7700e- i i 0.0605 0.0605 i i 0.0605 0.0605 954.4363 954.4363 � 0.0183 i 0.0175 � 960.1080 Mitigated ;i 003 NaturalGas 0.0875 0.7954 0.6681 4.7700e- - 0.0605 • 0.0605 - 0.0605 0.0605 954.4363 • 954.4363 0.0183 0.0175 960.1080 Unmitigated 003 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Manufacturing � 8112.71 4 0.0875 i 0.7954 0.6681 4.7700e- 0.0605 i 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 954.4363 954.4363 i 0.0183 i 0.0175 i 960.1080 003 �� ------- -------'------- ------- ------- ------- -------'--------------- ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- Other Asphalt 0 -1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces Other Non- 0 ■1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces Parking Lot 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0875 0.7954 0.6681 4.7700e- 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 954.4363 954.4363 0.0183 0.0175 960.1080 11 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 57 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust JPM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Manufacturing 8.11271 •i 0.0875 i 0.7954 � 0.6681 4.7700e- 0.0605 i 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 i 954.4363 954.4363 i 0.0183 i 0.0175 960.1080 003 Other Asphalt i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Surfaces Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces Parking Lot i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0875 0.7954 0.6681 4.7700e- 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 077 954.4363 954.4363 0.0183 0.0175 960.1080 11 003 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 58 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 2.0896 i 2.9000e- i 0.0315 i 0.0000 i i 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- i i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 � 0.0672 i 1.8000e- � i 0.0717 •� 004 004 004 004 004 . 004 i ••____-��--------------+__......------}....------....}----._...._.__+......------..}..------......+__._....---------------------}----._......--*-''---- ____•__ -----------------------------}____......_.__----------------____.. Unmitigated 2.0896 2.9000e- 0.0315 0.0000 - 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 - 1.8000e- 0.0717 004 004 004 004 004 004 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 0.2404 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating -----------%------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- --------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------*------- Consumer •i 1.8462 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � i � 0.0000 i � i 0.0000 Products Landscaping •i 2.9400e- i 2.9000e- 0.0315 i 0.0000 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 i 1.8000e- 0.0717 003 004 004 004 004 004 004 i Total 2.0896 2.9000e- 0.0315 0.0000 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 1.8000e- 0.0717 004 004 004 004 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 59 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 0.2404 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •1 1.8462 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping •i 2.9400e- i 2.9000e- � 0.0315 i 0.0000 i � 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- � i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- � i 0.0672 � 0.0672 i 1.8000e- � � 0.0717 003 004 004 004 004 004 004 i Total 2.0896 2.9000e- 0.0315 0.0000 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 1.8000e- 0.0717 004 004 004 004 004 004 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1• 4.00, 365, 200, 0.37-CNG CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 60 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:49 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter UnMitigated/Mitigated ROG NOx I CO S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Equipment Type lb/day lb/day Tractors/Loaders/•i 0.1367 1.5461 i 0.7740 3.1700e- 0.0522 i 0.0522 0.0480 0.0480 307.0801 307.0801 0.0993 309.5630 Backhoes •� 003 Total 0.1367 1.5461 0.7740 3.1700e- 0.0522 0.0522 0.0480 0.0480 307.0801 307.0801 0.0993 309.5630 003 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual Pennington Industrial (Operations - Passenger Cars) Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Manufacturing 91.14 + 1000sgft ; 2.09 91,140.00 i 0 ----------- -----------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- ;------------- Other Asphalt Surfaces 32.10 + 1000sgft ; 0.74 32,100.00 -+ 0 -------------- --------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- = — — ;------------- ------- Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 19.80 + 1000sgft ; 0.45 19,798.00 -+ 0 -----------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- --------------}------------------ --------------- Parking Lot 164.00 Space T 1.51 65,600.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.4 Precipitation Freq(Days) 28 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2021 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual Project Characteristics - Land Use-Total Project Area is 4.79 acres. Construction Phase- Operations Run Only. Off-road Equipment- Operations Run Only. Trips and VMT- Operations Run Only. Vehicle Trips -Trip Rates are based on information provided in Focused Traffic Evaluation by Urban Crossroads, Inc. Operational Off-Road Equipment- Based on SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Busniess Survey Results (2014) Fleet Mix- Fleet Mix based on normalization of CaIEEMod defaults between LDA, LDT1, LDT2, and MDV categories. Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstruction Phase NumDays 20.00 1.00 ----------------------------_------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix HHD 0.07 0.00 ---------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LDA ? 0.54 0.61 ---------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t------------------------- tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.04 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LDT2 0.19 0.21 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LHD2 5.1410e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix MY 4.5820e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- tblFleetMix MDV 0.12 0.13 ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ---------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix MH ? 1.0380e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix MHD 0.02 0.00 -----------t---- t-- ---------- ------------ -----------------r 1 0.00 ------003 ---------T----------- ----------- BUS r -----------tblFleetMix ----------�------------ SBUS-------------r 9.4500e-004 ---------T----------- 0.00 ----------- r tblFleetMix UBUS 1.1830e-003 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.48 1.51 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblOffRoad Equipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount } 3.00 0.00 tblOffRoad Equipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount } 2.00 0.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperDaysPerYear } 260.00 365.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperFuelType } Diesel CNG tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperHorsePower } 97.00 200.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperHoursPerDay } 8.00 4.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperOffRoad Equ ipmentN umber } 0.00 1.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.43 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.10 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.28 7.55 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.46 0.36 tblVehicleE F HHD i 1.46 2.9270e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD } 6,485.38 1,409.07 tblVehicleEF HHD } 1,461.92 1,350.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.62 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 26.41 7.34 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.69 3.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.04 0.04 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.8000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF HHD 8.8680e-003 8.8980e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.5000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 8.4000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.5800e-003 1.0300e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.85 0.58 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.8000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.07 0.07 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.8000e-004 5.3700e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 7.1000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 8.4000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.5800e-003 1.0300e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.97 0.66 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.8000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.11 0.09 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.8000e-004 5.3700e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.35 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.10 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.39 7.39 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.46 0.36 tblVehicleE F HHD i 1.39 2.7700e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD 6,867.98 1,402.59 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF HHD 1,461.92 1,350.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.62 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 27.25 7.10 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.54 2.88 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.04 0.04 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.8000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 9.7680e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.03 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 8.8680e-003 8.8980e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.5000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.6300e-004 8.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.9560e-003 1.1800e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.80 0.60 tblVehicleEF HHD i 9.2000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.07 0.07 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.8400e-004 5.5600e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.04 1.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 6.9000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.6300e-004 8.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.9560e-003 1.1800e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.92 0.69 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF HHD 9.2000e-005 4.00OOe-006 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.11 0.09 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.8400e-004 5.5600e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.54 0.03 tblVehicleE F HHD i 0.03 3.2330e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.10 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.51 7.76 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.45 0.32 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.47 2.9120e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD } 5,957.03 1,414.57 tblVehicleEF HHD } 1,461.92 1,340.32 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.62 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 25.25 7.65 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.67 3.02 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.02 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.04 0.04 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.8000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.02 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.03 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 8.8680e-003 8.8710e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.5000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 6.7000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehicleE F HHD 2.7490e-003 1.2100e-004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF HHD 0.91 0.54 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.1000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.07 0.07 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.9200e-004 5.6500e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 7.1000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 6.7000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.7490e-003 1.2100e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.05 0.62 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.1000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.11 0.08 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.9200e-004 5.6500e-004 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehicleEF LDA i 4.0430e-003 2.4680e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 5.4670e-003 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.58 0.66 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.16 2.12 tblVehicleEF LDA i 255.91 265.87 tblVehicleEF LDA i 58.81 54.73 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.05 0.04 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.6140e-003 1.4470e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.2650e-003 1.9190e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.4880e-003 1.3330e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.0830e-003 1.7640e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA 0.05 0.07 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LDA 0.10 0.10 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.01 9.5180e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.07 0.23 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.5630e-003 2.6300e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 6.0800e-004 5.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.05 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.10 0.10 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.08 0.25 tblVehicleEF LDA i 4.5900e-003 2.8100e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 4.7470e-003 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.71 0.81 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.02 1.87 tblVehicleEF LDA i 278.73 289.14 tblVehicleEF LDA i 58.81 54.24 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.05 0.04 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.6140e-003 1.4470e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.2650e-003 1.9190e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.4880e-003 1.3330e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.0830e-003 1.7640e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.10 0.14 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.12 0.12 tblVehicleEF LDA 0.07 0.10 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.06 0.20 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.7930e-003 2.8600e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 6.0500e-004 5.3700e-004 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.10 0.14 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.12 0.12 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.07 0.10 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.07 0.22 tblVehicleEF LDA i 3.8980e-003 2.3810e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 5.6140e-003 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.54 0.62 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.19 2.17 tblVehicleEF LDA i 249.57 259.47 tblVehicleEF LDA i 58.81 54.82 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.05 0.04 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.6140e-003 1.4470e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.2650e-003 1.9190e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 1.4880e-003 1.3330e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.0830e-003 1.7640e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.06 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.11 0.11 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.03 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 9.8140e-003 9.1880e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.24 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LDA 0.08 0.23 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDA i 2.4990e-003 2.5670e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA i 6.0800e-004 5.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.06 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.11 0.11 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.03 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.04 0.24 tblVehicleEF LDA i 0.08 0.26 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.01 8.0140e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.02 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 1.46 1.62 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 3.40 2.43 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 315.98 317.00 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 72.28 66.64 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.14 0.14 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 2.5300e-003 2.2930e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 3.6970e-003 2.9510e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 2.3290e-003 2.1110e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 3.4000e-003 2.7140e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.21 0.23 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.35 0.27 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.14 0.15 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.03 0.04 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.20 0.87 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.24 0.44 tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.1780e-003 3.1370e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LDT1 7.8300e-004 6.5900e-004 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.21 0.23 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.35 0.27 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.14 0.15 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.20 0.87 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.26 0.48 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.01 9.0560e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.02 0.08 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 1.76 1.96 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 2.99 2.15 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 343.19 341.79 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 72.28 66.01 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.13 0.13 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 2.5300e-003 2.2930e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 3.6970e-003 2.9510e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 2.3290e-003 2.1110e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 3.4000e-003 2.7140e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.41 0.44 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.43 0.34 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.27 0.29 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.03 0.04 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.20 0.88 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.21 0.38 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 3.4550e-003 3.3820e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 7.7500e-004 6.5300e-004 tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.41 0.44 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.43 0.34 ----------------------------Y---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.27 0.29 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.05 0.06 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.20 0.88 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.23 0.42 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.01 7.7080e-003 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.02 0.09 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.37 1.51 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.46 2.48 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 307.88 309.49 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 72.28 66.77 tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.14 0.14 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.5300e-003 2.2930e-003 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.6970e-003 2.9510e-003 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.3290e-003 2.1110e-003 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.4000e-003 2.7140e-003 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.18 0.19 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.39 0.30 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.12 0.13 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 0.03 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.23 1.01 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.25 0.45 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.0960e-003 3.0630e-003 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 7.8400e-004 6.6100e-004 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.18 0.19 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.39 0.30 i tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.12 0.13 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 0.05 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.23 1.01 tblVehicleEF LDT1 i 0.27 0.50 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 5.6080e-003 4.2470e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 7.2840e-003 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.76 0.98 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.53 2.73 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 355.02 338.79 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 81.24 71.51 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.08 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.6030e-003 1.4980e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 2.3320e-003 1.9580e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.4740e-003 1.3790e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 2.1450e-003 1.8010e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.11 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.12 0.14 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.44 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.33 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 3.5560e-003 3.3520e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 8.3800e-004 7.0800e-004 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.11 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.12 0.14 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.06 0.44 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.11 0.37 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 6.3630e-003 4.8280e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 6.3270e-003 0.06 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.93 1.20 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.35 2.42 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 386.34 362.86 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 81.24 70.86 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.08 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.6030e-003 1.4980e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 2.3320e-003 1.9580e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.4740e-003 1.3790e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 2.1450e-003 1.8010e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.22 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.17 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.17 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.44 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.09 0.29 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 3.8710e-003 3.5900e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 8.3500e-004 7.0100e-004 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.22 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.17 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.17 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.44 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.09 0.32 tblVehicleEF LDT2 5.3900e-003 4.0760e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LDT2 7.4940e-003 0.07 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.71 0.91 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.57 2.80 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 345.65 331.49 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 81.24 71.65 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.08 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.6030e-003 1.4980e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 2.3320e-003 1.9580e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 1.4740e-003 1.3790e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 2.1450e-003 1.8010e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.13 0.15 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.05 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.51 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.34 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 3.4620e-003 3.2800e-003 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 8.3900e-004 7.0900e-004 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.13 0.15 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.05 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.51 tblVehicleEF LDT2 i 0.11 0.38 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 5.4460e-003 4.8820e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 5.3310e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.15 0.17 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.96 0.72 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.41 0.96 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.26 9.44 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 607.95 639.95 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 30.36 10.54 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.09 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.21 1.60 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.7200e-004 9.7000e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 8.7100e-004 2.3300e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-004 9.2800e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.5390e-003 2.5010e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 8.0100e-004 2.1400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.8710e-003 3.1780e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 1.9010e-003 1.5570e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.08 0.06 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.31 0.50 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.26 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-005 9.1000e-005 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 5.9620e-003 6.2250e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.4900e-004 1.0400e-004 ---------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------ tblVehicleE F LHD1 3.8710e-003 3.1780e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 0.08 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 1.9010e-003 1.5570e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.07 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.31 0.50 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.28 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 5.4460e-003 4.8940e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 5.4200e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.15 0.17 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.97 0.73 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.29 0.92 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.26 9.44 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 607.95 639.97 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 30.36 10.46 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.09 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.08 1.51 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.7200e-004 9.7000e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 8.7100e-004 2.3300e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-004 9.2800e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.5390e-003 2.5010e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 8.0100e-004 2.1400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 7.2450e-003 5.9530e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.12 0.09 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.6380e-003 2.9980e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.08 0.06 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.32 0.50 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.25 0.07 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-005 9.1000e-005 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 5.9620e-003 6.2250e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.4700e-004 1.0300e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 7.2450e-003 5.9530e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.12 0.09 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.6380e-003 2.9980e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.32 0.50 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.27 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 5.4460e-003 4.8810e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 5.3180e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.15 0.17 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.96 0.72 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.41 0.96 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.26 9.44 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 607.95 639.95 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 30.36 10.54 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.09 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.18 1.59 tblVehicleE F LHD1 9.7200e-004 9.7000e-004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 8.7100e-004 2.3300e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-004 9.2800e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 2.5390e-003 2.5010e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 8.0100e-004 2.1400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.4570e-003 2.8250e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.11 0.09 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 1.7350e-003 1.4150e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.08 0.06 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.33 0.53 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.26 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-005 9.1000e-005 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 5.9620e-003 6.2250e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.4900e-004 1.0400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 3.4570e-003 2.8250e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.11 0.09 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 1.7350e-003 1.4150e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.07 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.33 0.53 tblVehicleEF LHD1 i 0.28 0.08 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.6660e-003 3.1720e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 4.5290e-003 3.8570e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.3110e-003 9.0280e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.12 0.13 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.50 0.53 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.15 0.56 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 14.48 14.86 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 604.20 638.83 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 23.56 7.29 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.12 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.71 1.77 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.3360e-003 1.4390e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.8700e-004 1.1400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.2780e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.6970e-003 2.7110e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.5600e-004 1.0500e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.4980e-003 1.6870e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.04 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 7.7800e-004 8.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.11 0.04 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.4100e-004 1.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 5.8740e-003 6.1550e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.5700e-004 7.2000e-005 ---------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------ tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.4980e-003 1.6870e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.04 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 7.7800e-004 8.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.07 0.07 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.05 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.6660e-003 3.1790e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 4.5800e-003 3.8860e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 8.0210e-003 8.7250e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.13 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.51 0.53 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.10 0.53 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 14.48 14.86 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 604.20 638.83 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 23.56 7.25 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.12 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.62 1.67 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.3360e-003 1.4390e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.8700e-004 1.1400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.2780e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.6970e-003 2.7110e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.5600e-004 1.0500e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.8320e-003 3.1830e-003 ---------------------------- ------------------------- ---------------- ---------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.05 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.02 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.4720e-003 1.6130e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.11 0.04 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.4100e-004 1.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 5.8740e-003 6.1560e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.5600e-004 7.2000e-005 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.8320e-003 3.1830e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.4720e-003 1.6130e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.07 0.07 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.05 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.6660e-003 3.1700e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 4.5170e-003 3.8490e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 8.3600e-003 9.0930e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.13 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.50 0.53 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.16 0.56 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 14.48 14.86 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 604.20 638.83 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 23.56 7.30 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.12 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.70 1.75 tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.3360e-003 1.4390e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.8700e-004 1.1400e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.2780e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.6970e-003 2.7110e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 3.5600e-004 1.0500e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.1910e-003 1.3290e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 6.6000e-004 7.0100e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.27 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.11 0.04 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.4100e-004 1.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 5.8740e-003 6.1550e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 2.5700e-004 7.2000e-005 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 1.1910e-003 1.3290e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 6.6000e-004 7.0100e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.07 0.07 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.27 tblVehicleEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.05 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.42 0.32 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.15 0.24 tblVehicleEF MY 19.52 19.61 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MY 9.67 8.55 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MY i 165.74 208.30 tblVehicleEF MY i 46.23 60.73 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.13 1.13 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.7750e-003 1.7570e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.4010e-003 2.8660e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.6600e-003 1.6440e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.2060e-003 2.7000e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.69 1.66 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.85 0.84 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.92 0.90 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.15 2.16 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.57 1.87 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.08 1.83 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.0380e-003 2.0610e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 6.8100e-004 6.0100e-004 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.69 1.66 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.85 0.84 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.92 0.90 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.65 2.65 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.57 1.87 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.26 1.99 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.42 0.32 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.14 0.22 tblVehicleEF MY i 20.23 20.27 tblVehicleEF MY i 9.11 8.00 tblVehicleEF MY 165.74 209.26 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MY 46.23 59.19 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MY i 0.98 0.98 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.7750e-003 1.7570e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.4010e-003 2.8660e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.6600e-003 1.6440e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.2060e-003 2.7000e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.35 3.28 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.24 1.23 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.10 2.05 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.13 2.13 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.57 1.86 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.86 1.63 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.0490e-003 2.0710e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 6.6500e-004 5.8600e-004 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.35 3.28 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.24 1.23 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.10 2.05 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.62 2.63 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.57 1.86 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.02 1.77 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.42 0.32 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.15 0.24 tblVehicleEF MY i 19.04 19.14 tblVehicleEF MY i 9.62 8.49 tblVehicleEF MY i 165.74 207.52 tblVehicleEF MY i 46.23 60.64 tblVehicleEF MY 1.12 1.12 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MY 1.7750e-003 1.7570e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MY i 3.4010e-003 2.8660e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.6600e-003 1.6440e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 3.2060e-003 2.7000e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.60 1.59 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.05 1.04 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.74 0.73 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.15 2.15 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.65 2.12 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.08 1.83 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.0310e-003 2.0540e-003 tblVehicleEF MY i 6.8100e-004 6.00OOe-004 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.60 1.59 tblVehicleEF MY i 1.05 1.04 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.74 0.73 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.64 2.65 tblVehicleEF MY i 0.65 2.12 tblVehicleEF MY i 2.27 1.99 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.01 5.7580e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.02 0.09 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.42 1.20 tblVehicleEF MDV i 3.18 3.27 tblVehicleEF MDV i 488.89 421.49 tblVehicleEF MDV i 110.15 88.73 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.17 0.12 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.7110e-003 1.5730e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV 2.4630e-003 2.0550e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MDV 1.5780e-003 1.4510e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MDV i 2.2660e-003 1.8910e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.11 0.13 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.20 0.17 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.09 0.11 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.03 0.03 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.25 0.45 tblVehicleEF MDV i 4.9000e-003 4.1680e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.1570e-003 8.7800e-004 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.11 0.13 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.20 0.17 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.09 0.11 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.05 0.04 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.27 0.49 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.01 6.5120e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.02 0.08 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.73 1.46 tblVehicleEF MDV i 2.81 2.88 tblVehicleEF MDV i 530.71 447.07 tblVehicleEF MDV i 110.15 87.92 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.16 0.11 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.7110e-003 1.5730e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 2.4630e-003 2.0550e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.5780e-003 1.4510e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV 2.2660e-003 1.8910e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MDV 0.22 0.26 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.23 0.20 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.17 0.21 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.04 0.03 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.21 0.39 tblVehicleEF MDV i 5.3230e-003 4.4210e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.1510e-003 8.7000e-004 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.22 0.26 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.23 0.20 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.17 0.21 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.05 0.04 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.23 0.43 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.01 5.5370e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.02 0.09 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.33 1.12 tblVehicleEF MDV i 3.24 3.34 tblVehicleEF MDV i 476.42 413.84 tblVehicleEF MDV i 110.15 88.88 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.16 0.12 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.7110e-003 1.5730e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 2.4630e-003 2.0550e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.5780e-003 1.4510e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 2.2660e-003 1.8910e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.09 0.10 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.21 0.18 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MDV 0.08 0.10 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.13 0.57 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.25 0.46 tblVehicleEF MDV i 4.7750e-003 4.0920e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV i 1.1590e-003 8.8000e-004 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.09 0.10 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.21 0.18 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.08 0.10 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.05 0.03 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.13 0.57 tblVehicleEF MDV i 0.28 0.50 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 3.3370e-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 2.70 0.34 tblVehicleEF MH i 5.98 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH } 1,002.10 941.76 tblVehicleEF MH i 57.67 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.67 4.43 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.0860e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 3.2460e-003 4.00OOe-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehicleEF MH i 9.9800e-004 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.56 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 0.08 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MH 0.54 0.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MH i 0.09 0.07 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.35 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 9.9460e-003 8.9030e-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 6.8100e-004 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.56 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.08 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.54 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.13 0.08 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.39 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 3.3370e-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.02 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 2.78 0.34 tblVehicleEF MH i 5.56 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH } 1,002.10 941.76 tblVehicleEF MH i 57.67 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.55 4.18 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.0860e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 3.2460e-003 4.00OOe-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehicleEF MH i 9.980Oe-004 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 2.87 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 0.10 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MH 1.06 0.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MH i 0.10 0.07 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.34 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 9.9470e-003 8.9030e-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 6.7400e-004 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 2.87 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.10 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.06 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.13 0.08 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.37 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 3.3370e-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 2.70 0.34 tblVehicleEF MH i 6.02 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH } 1,002.10 941.76 tblVehicleEF MH i 57.67 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.65 4.38 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.0860e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 3.2460e-003 4.00OOe-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehicleEF MH i 9.9800e-004 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.58 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 0.10 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MH 0.53 0.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MH i 0.09 0.07 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.35 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 9.9460e-003 8.9030e-003 tblVehicleEF MH i 6.8200e-004 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 1.58 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.10 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.53 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.13 0.08 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH i 0.39 0.00 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 3.1500e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 3.7220e-003 5.9790e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.06 8.4870e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.35 0.34 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.28 0.57 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.06 1.01 tblVehicleEF MHD i 151.96 74.93 tblVehicleEF MHD } 1,066.63 1,001.03 tblVehicleEF MHD i 55.49 8.18 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.65 0.69 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.99 2.37 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.0680e-003 2.4180e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.4490e-003 0.08 tblVehicleEF MHD i 7.8800e-004 9.6000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD 1.0220e-003 2.3130e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MHD 6.1670e-003 0.08 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MHD i 7.2400e-004 8.8000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.7450e-003 7.1900e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.05 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 8.5800e-004 3.5500e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.03 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 0.10 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.37 0.05 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.4610e-003 7.1000e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.01 9.5290e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.6100e-004 8.1000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.7450e-003 7.1900e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.05 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.04 0.03 tblVehicleEF MHD i 8.5800e-004 3.5500e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.04 0.12 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 0.10 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.40 0.05 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 2.9880e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 3.7740e-003 6.0080e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.05 8.2030e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.26 0.28 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.28 0.57 tblVehicleEF MHD i 5.78 0.96 tblVehicleEF MHD i 160.96 76.44 tblVehicleEF MHD 1,066.63 1,001.04 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MHD 55.49 8.10 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.67 0.70 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.93 2.23 tblVehicleEF MHD i 9.00OOe-004 2.0410e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.4490e-003 0.08 tblVehicleEF MHD i 7.8800e-004 9.6000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 8.6100e-004 1.9530e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.1670e-003 0.08 tblVehicleEF MHD i 7.2400e-004 8.8000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 3.3760e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.06 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.6840e-003 7.0100e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.03 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.36 0.04 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.5460e-003 7.2500e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.01 9.5290e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.5600e-004 8.00OOe-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 3.3760e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.06 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.04 0.03 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.6840e-003 7.0100e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.04 0.12 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.39 0.05 tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 3.3820e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MHD 3.6890e-003 5.9600e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.06 8.5610e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.49 0.43 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.27 0.57 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.14 1.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 139.53 72.84 tblVehicleEF MHD } 1,066.63 1,001.03 tblVehicleEF MHD i 55.49 8.20 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.62 0.67 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.98 2.35 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.2990e-003 2.9380e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.4490e-003 0.08 tblVehicleEF MHD i 7.8800e-004 9.6000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.2430e-003 2.8110e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.1670e-003 0.08 tblVehicleEF MHD i 7.2400e-004 8.8000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.3320e-003 5.6300e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.05 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.7900e-004 2.8800e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.03 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.37 0.05 tblVehicleEF MHD i 1.3440e-003 6.9100e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.01 9.5290e-003 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.6300e-004 8.1000e-005 tblVehicleEF MHD 1.3320e-003 5.6300e-004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.04 0.03 tblVehicleEF MHD i 6.7900e-004 2.8800e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.04 0.12 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehicleEF MHD i 0.41 0.05 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.01 8.9240e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.0950e-003 8.5070e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.27 0.50 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.54 0.93 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 6.17 2.58 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 75.04 73.28 tblVehicleEF OBUS } 1,098.07 1,407.22 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 70.10 20.86 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.35 0.44 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.12 1.70 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.2100e-004 1.7750e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 6.0450e-003 0.04 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.2300e-004 1.9000e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.1600e-004 1.6990e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 5.7680e-003 0.04 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 7.5700e-004 1.7400e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 2.1800e-003 2.5990e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.3000e-004 1.1120e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.09 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.39 0.12 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 7.2800e-004 6.9900e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.0900e-004 2.0600e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 2.1800e-003 2.5990e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.07 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 9.3000e-004 1.1120e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.11 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.42 0.14 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.01 8.9470e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.2540e-003 8.6370e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.26 0.48 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.55 0.94 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 5.76 2.41 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 78.48 73.81 tblVehicleEF OBUS } 1,098.07 1,407.25 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 70.10 20.57 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.36 0.45 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.04 1.59 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.0200e-004 1.5000e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 6.0450e-003 0.04 tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.2300e-004 1.9000e-004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.8000e-005 1.4350e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF OBUS i 5.7680e-003 0.04 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 7.5700e-004 1.7400e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 4.0690e-003 4.7330e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.7890e-003 2.1320e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.04 0.09 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.37 0.12 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 7.6100e-004 7.0400e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.0200e-004 2.0400e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 4.0690e-003 4.7330e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.07 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.7890e-003 2.1320e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.11 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.40 0.13 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.01 8.9200e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.0660e-003 8.4690e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.28 0.53 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.54 0.92 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 6.22 2.60 tblVehicleEF OBUS 70.30 72.56 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,098.07 1,407.21 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF OBUS i 70.10 20.90 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.34 0.44 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.11 1.68 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.4700e-004 2.1560e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 6.0450e-003 0.04 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.2300e-004 1.9000e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.4100e-004 2.0620e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 5.7680e-003 0.04 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 7.5700e-004 1.7400e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.8870e-003 2.3830e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.04 0.05 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.5400e-004 1.0620e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.04 0.09 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.27 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.39 0.13 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 6.8300e-004 6.9200e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.1000e-004 2.0700e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 1.8870e-003 2.3830e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.07 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 8.5400e-004 1.0620e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.11 tblVehicleEF OBUS i 0.05 0.27 tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.42 0.14 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.84 0.08 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 6.6110e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.06 6.9670e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 7.83 3.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.64 0.53 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 6.66 0.94 tblVehicleEF SBUS } 1,146.29 366.87 tblVehicleEF SBUS } 1,103.40 1,115.27 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 53.92 6.06 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 10.00 3.57 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.65 4.82 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 4.0660e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 0.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.5700e-004 4.00OOe-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 3.890Oe-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.6950e-003 2.651Oe-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.200Oe-004 3.600Oe-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.6830e-003 1.3080e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 8.6250e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.94 0.36 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.1770e-003 6.250Oe-004 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.11 0.10 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.37 0.04 tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 3.5040e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF SBUS i 6.5500e-004 6.00OOe-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.6830e-003 1.3080e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 8.6250e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 1.35 0.52 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.1770e-003 6.2500e-004 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.13 0.11 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.40 0.04 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.84 0.08 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 6.6860e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.05 5.8380e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 7.71 2.99 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.65 0.54 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.83 0.68 tblVehicleEF SBUS } 1,198.60 377.09 tblVehicleEF SBUS } 1,103.40 1,115.28 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 53.92 5.63 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 10.32 3.66 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.37 4.53 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 9.1190e-003 3.4340e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 0.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.5700e-004 4.00OOe-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 8.7240e-003 3.2850e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.6950e-003 2.6510e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.03 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.2000e-004 3.6000e-005 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF SBUS i 8.4640e-003 2.3620e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 9.1440e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.93 0.36 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.0830e-003 1.1650e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.11 0.10 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.31 0.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 3.6000e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 6.2400e-004 5.6000e-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 8.4640e-003 2.3620e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 9.1440e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 1.35 0.52 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.0830e-003 1.1650e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.13 0.11 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.34 0.04 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.84 0.08 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 6.6040e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.07 7.2110e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 8.00 3.09 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.63 0.53 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 7.02 0.98 tblVehicleEF SBUS } 1,074.07 352.76 tblVehicleEF SBUS } 1,103.40 1,115.26 ---------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------------------ -------------------------- tblVehicleEF SBUS 53.92 6.14 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.56 3.44 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.60 4.78 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 4.9380e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 0.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.5700e-004 4.00OOe-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 4.7240e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.6950e-003 2.6510e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.2000e-004 3.6000e-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.1680e-003 1.1480e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 8.8290e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.94 0.36 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.1000e-003 6.0300e-004 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.11 0.10 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.02 0.06 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.38 0.04 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 3.3710e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 6.6100e-004 6.1000e-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 4.1680e-003 1.1480e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.03 8.8290e-003 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 1.35 0.52 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 2.1000e-003 6.0300e-004 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.13 0.11 tblVehicleEF SBUS i 0.02 0.06 tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.41 0.05 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.51 3.35 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.09 0.02 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 8.45 26.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 15.26 1.50 tblVehicleEF UBUS } 1,822.40 1,617.71 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 153.45 18.08 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.95 0.32 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.50 0.09 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.06 2.9340e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.4200e-003 1.6100e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.21 0.04 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 3.00OOe-003 5.4780e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.05 2.7920e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.3060e-003 1.4800e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 9.7430e-003 1.6370e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.11 9.7740e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.7860e-003 7.1300e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.52 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.17 0.07 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 9.9960e-003 4.8690e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.8100e-003 1.7900e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 9.7430e-003 1.6370e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.11 9.7740e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.7860e-003 7.1300e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.08 3.43 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 45 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.05 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.28 0.08 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.52 3.35 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.08 0.02 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 8.53 26.06 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 13.06 1.28 tblVehicleEF UBUS } 1,822.40 1,617.72 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 153.45 17.70 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.62 0.31 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.50 0.09 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.06 2.9340e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.4200e-003 1.6100e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.21 0.04 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 3.00OOe-003 5.4780e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.05 2.7920e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.3060e-003 1.4800e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.02 2.9250e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.14 0.01 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 9.6600e-003 1.4550e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.53 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.06 0.07 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 9.9970e-003 4.8690e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.7720e-003 1.7500e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.02 2.9250e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.14 0.01 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 46 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF UBUS 9.6600e-003 1.4550e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleEF UBUS i 2.09 3.43 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.17 0.07 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.51 3.35 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.09 0.02 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 8.44 26.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 15.44 1.49 tblVehicleEF UBUS } 1,822.40 1,617.71 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 153.45 18.06 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.92 0.31 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.50 0.09 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.01 0.02 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.06 2.9340e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.4200e-003 1.6100e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.21 0.04 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 3.00OOe-003 5.4780e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.05 2.7920e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.3060e-003 1.4800e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 8.9770e-003 1.7200e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.13 0.01 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.3820e-003 7.5400e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.52 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.03 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.18 0.07 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 9.9960e-003 4.8690e-003 tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.8130e-003 1.7900e-004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 47 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF UBUS 8.9770e-003 1.7200e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.13 0.01 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 4.3820e-003 7.5400e-004 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 2.08 3.43 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 0.03 0.05 tblVehicleEF UBUS i 1.29 0.08 tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP } 28.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP } 13.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP } 59.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips DV_TP } 5.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP } 3.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP } 92.00 100.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR } 1.49 6.42 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 0.62 5.09 -------------------------- ------------------------------:------------------------------ -------------------------- tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.82 3.16 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 48 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Year tons/yr MT/yr 2020 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0. 0000 0.0000 0.0 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 11 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Year tons/yr MT/yr 2020 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 49 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG+NOX(tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG+NOX(tons/quarter) Highest 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 0.3812 i 4.000Oe- i 3.9300e- 0.0000 i i 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- i i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- � 0.0000 i 7.6200e- i 7.6200e- i 2.000Oe- i 0.0000 � 8.1300e- '� 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 i 003 ---- ---- •------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------j-------j--------------- ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- Energy •i 0.0160 i 0.1452 i 0.1219 i 8.7000e- 0.0110 i 0.0110 i i 0.0110 0.0110 0.0000 1 460.0806 i 460.0806 i 0.0155 5.4800e- 462.1003 004 003 Mobile •1 0.1640 i 0.1720 i 2.3338 i 7.2000e- 0.8025 3.8600e- i 0.8064 i 0.2130 i 3.5500e- 0.2166 0.0000 1 660.7350 660.7350 i 0.0156 0.0000 661.1255 003 003 003 Offroad •1 0.0249 i 0.2822 i 0.1413 5.8000e- i i 9.5300e- i 9.5300e- i i 8.7600e- 8.7600e- 0.0000 1 50.8406 i 50.8406 i 0.0164 i 0.0000 51.2516 004 003 003 003 003 i Waste •i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 22.9400 i 0.0000 22.9400 i 1.3557 0.0000 1 56.8329 Water •1 i i i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 6.6865 i 87.4400 94.1265 i 0.6904 0.0170 116.4408 Total 0.5860 0.5993 2.6009 8.6500e- 0.8025 0.0244 0.8269 0.2130 0.0234 0.2364 29.6265 1,259.103 1,288.730 2.0937 0.0224 1,347.759 11 003 8 3 2 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 50 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 0.3812 i 4.000Oe- 3.9300e- i 0.0000 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 7.6200e- � 7.6200e- i 2.000Oe- � 0.0000 � 8.1300e- �� 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 i 003 Energy •i 0.0160 i 0.1452 0.1219 i 8.7000e- 0.0110 i 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 0.0000 i 460.0806 460.0806 i 0.0155 5.4800e- 462.1003 004 003 Mobile •1 0.1640 i 0.1720 2.3338 i 7.2000e- 0.8025 3.8600e- i 0.8064 0.2130 i 3.5500e- 0.2166 0.0000 i 660.7350 660.7350 i 0.0156 0.0000 661.1255 003 003 003 i Offroad •i 0.0249 i 0.2822 0.1413 i 5.8000e- 9.5300e- i 9.5300e- i 8.7600e- 8.7600e- 0.0000 i 50.8406 50.8406 i 0.0164 0.0000 51.2516 004 003 003 003 003 i Waste •1 i � i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 22.9400 i 0.0000 22.9400 i 1.3557 0.0000 56.8329 Water •1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 a 6.6865 i 87.4400 94.1265 i 0.6904 0.0170 116.4408 Total 0.5860 0.5993 2.6009 8.6500e- 0.8025 0.0244 0.8269 0.2130 0.0234 0.2364 29.6265 1,259.103 1,288.730 2.0937 0.0224 1,347.759 11 003 8 3 1 2 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 ;Demolition -Demolition :1/6/2020 1/6/2020 5. 1. CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 51 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 2.7 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating —sgft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; OE 8.001 81: 0.73 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+---------------------------- Demolition +Excavators ; 01 8.001 158, 0.38 --------------------------- -*-----------------}----------- ------------- ----------- Demolition -Rubber Tired Dozers 01 8.00. 247- 0.40 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 0. 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00,LD Mix HDT Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 52 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I 1 1 I 1 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00=00000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 ;� I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • � 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I ........... 1-------J-------J-------J-------J-------J-------J-------J-------J............... ...... ----J-------J-------JI ------- ....... r I Vendo 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I 1 ;� I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I Worker •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 ;� I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • � 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 I 1 17.1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 53 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I 1 1 I 1 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00=00000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 ;� I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • � 1 1 I 1 •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I 1 1 I 1 1 Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I 1 ;� I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I Worker •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • � 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 I 1 7.1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 54 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated �� 0.1640 i 0.1720 i 2.3338 7.2000e- i 0.8025 3.8600e- 0.8064 i 0.2130 3.5500e- 0.2166 0.0000 i 660.7350 660.7350 0.0156 i 0.0000 i 661.1255 003 003 003 Unmitigated 0.1640 0.1720 2.3338 7.2000e- 0.8025 3.8600e- - 0.8064 0.2130 3.5500e- 0.2166 0.0000 660.7350 660.7350 - 0.0156 0.0000 661.1255 003 003 003 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Manufacturing ; 288.00 ; 585.12 463.90 2,148,534 2,148,534 ......................................-------------------------T------------ ------------------------:-------------------------- Other Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 ................................................... ---------- ----------- ---------------------- ------------------------r Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 ......................................------------ -r----------- ---------- ---------------------- ----------------------- Parking Lot ; 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 288.00 585.12 463.90 2,148,534 2,148,534 4.3 Trip Type Information CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 55 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Manufacturing 16.60 8.40 6.90 100.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 ........................------------------__ __ ___ _ -- ---- ------------- Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 ? 6.90 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0 0 0 .......................r----------------------- -------- --------- -------- ----------------- Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Manufacturing 0.614000i 0.043000; 0.210000; 0.133000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000- 0.000000 i i---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------t---------------t---------------i---------------i----------------i----------------i---------------- -------- Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.5421161 0.0375781 0.1852031 0.1185031 0.0162411 0.0051411 0.0173921 0.0686951 0.0013831 0.0011831 0.0045821 0.000945. 0.001038 i i i---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------t---------------i---------------i---------------i----------------i----------------i---------------- -------- OtherNon-AsphaltSurfaces 0.5421161 0.0375781 0.1852031 0.1185031 0.0162411 0.0051411 0.0173921 0.0686951 0.0013831 0.0011831 0.0045821 0.000945, 0.001038 i i i i i Parking Lot 0.542116. 0.037578, 0.185203, 0.118503, 0.016241, 0.005141, 0.017392, 0.068695, 0.001383, 0.001183, 0.004582, 0.000945, 0.001038 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 56 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 I Electricity •1 I 1 1 I 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 302.0630 1 302.0630 1 0.0125 1 2.5800e- i 303.1436 Mitigated 003 1 •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I Electricity •1 I 1 I 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 302.0630 1 302.0630 I 0.0125 1 2.5800e- � 303.1436 Unmitigated 003 1 •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I NaturalGas •1 0.0160 I 0.1452 1 0.1219 18.7000e- 1 I 0.0110 I 0.0110 I I 0.0110 0.0110 0.0000 I 158.0176 1 158.0176 13.0300e- 1 2.9000e- � 158.9567 Mitigated ;i I I 1 004 I 1 1 I 1 , i 1 1 003 I 003 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 I 1 NaturalGas 0.0160 0.1452 0.1219 8.7000e- - 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 0.0000 158.0176 • 158.0176 3.0300e- - 2.9000e- 158.9567 Unmitigated 004 003 003 -- -------- -------- --- 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I Manufacturing � 2.96114e.1 0.0160 I 0.1452 1 0.1219 1 8.7000e- I 1 0.0110 I 0.0110 1 1 0.0110 0.0110 • 0.0000 I 158.0176 1 158.0176 13.0300e- 12.9000e- i 158.9567 1 +006 004 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 003 I 003 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 ---------' �1-------J-------J-------J-------J-------J-------J-------J-------J-------"""" "" J J+ --'I------- ------- -------J------- _t �l I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I *------- Other Asphalt 0 .1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 Surfaces I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 --�I ---- I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I *------ Other Non- 1 0 ■1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 • 1 I I 1 h 71 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I *------- Parking Lot 1 0 •1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 '1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 • I 1 I I I 1 '1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 • I 1 I I I Total 0.0160 0.1452 0.1219 8.7000e- 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 0.0000 158.0176 158.0176 3.0300e- 2.9000e. 158.9567 11 004 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 57 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Manufacturing 2.96114e•i 0.0160 i 0.1452 � 0.1219 � 8.7000e- 0.0110 i 0.0110 � � 0.0110 0.0110 0.0000 i 158.0176 158.0176 i 3.0300e- i 2.9000e- 158.9567 i +006 004 003 003 i - ------ ------ - Other Asphalt 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Surfaces - ---- - ----- - Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000- i -0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces Parking Lot i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0160 0.1452 0.1219 8.7000e- 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 0.0000 158.0176 158.0176 3.0300e- 2.9000e- 158.9567 004 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 58 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Manufacturing 925071 •i 294.7474 i 0.0122 2.52OOe- 295.8019 •� 003 i ----------- •� ----------------�------it------ *------- Other Asphalt 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces ------- ------- Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces i •� -J------- ------- Parking Lot 22960 •i 7.3156 i 3.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 7.3417 004 i 005 Total 302.0630 0.0125 2.5800e- 303.1436 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 59 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Mitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Manufacturing 925071 •i 294.7474 i 0.0122 2.52OOe- 295.8019 003 ----------- ---------------- Other Asphalt 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces ------- ------- Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces i •� -J------- ------- Parking Lot 22960 •i 7.3156 i 3.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 7.3417 004 i 005 Total 302.0630 0.0125 2.5800e- 303.1436 003 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 60 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated •i 0.3812 : 4.000Oe- i 3.9300e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 7.6200e- i 7.6200e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.1300e- Z 005 003 005 005 005 005 . 003 003 005 i 003 Unmitigated 0.3812 4.000Oe- 3.9300e- 0.0000 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.6200e- 7.6200e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.1300e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 0.0439 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Coating •' ' i -----------%------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- --------------- - --- ------- ------- ------- -------*------- Consumer �� 0.3369 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Products Landscaping •i 3.7000e- i 4.000Oe- 3.9300e- i 0.0000 i 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 7.6200e- 7.6200e- i 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.1300e- •� 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 . 003 003 005 i 003 Total 0.3812 4.000Oe- 3.9300e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.6200e- 7.6200e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.1300e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 61 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 0.0439 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 0.3369 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 Products '� i Landscaping •i 3.7000e- i 4.000Oe- 3.9300e- i 0.0000 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 7.6200e- 7.6200e- i 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.1300e- '� 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 i 003 Total 0.3812 4.000Oe- 3.9300e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.6200e- 7.6200e- 2.0007 0.0000 8.1300e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 62 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated •1 94.1265 i 0.6904 0.0170 i 116.4408 ---------- --------------}--------------}---------------------- Unmitigated •• 94.1265 0.6904 0.0170 116.4408 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal MT/yr Manufacturing 21.0761/ •1 94.1265 0.6904 0.0170 116.4408 0 �� - -------r------i�------- T_______ Other Asphalt 0/0 -i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces i i1 i Other Non- 0/0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces -r--------------�---------------T Parking Lot 0/0 •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 94.1265 0.6904 0.0170 116.4408 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 63 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal MT/yr Manufacturing 21.0761/ •1 94.1265 0.6904 0.0170 116.4408 j 0 ------ ------- ------- Other Asphalt 0/0 •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces ------ ------- ------- Other Non- i 0/0 •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces i ------4r------ ------- ------- Parking Lot 0/0 •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 94.1265 0.6904 0.0170 116.4408 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 64 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual Category/Year Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr Mitigated •i 22.9400 i 1.3557 i 0.0000 i 56.8329 --____.i--------------+--"""------}...............___.. Unmitigated •• 22.9400 1.3557 0.0000 56.8329 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr Manufacturing 113.01 •i 22.9400 1.3557 0.0000 56.8329 ---------- ------- ------- Other Asphalt 0 •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces ; ------- ------- ------- Other Non- 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces -r--------------�-------�-------T Parking Lot 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 22.9400 1.3557 0.0000 56.8329 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 65 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Mitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr Manufacturing 113.01 •i 22.9400 1.3557 0.0000 56.8329 •� ------J------- ------- Other Asphalt 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces i •� •� ------ ------- ------- Other Non- i 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces i •: --ji ------- ------- Parking Lot 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 22.9400 1.3557 0.0000 56.8329 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1• 4.00, 365, 200, 0.37,CNG CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 66 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:51 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations- Passenger Cars)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual UnMitigated/Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Equipment Type tons/yr MT/yr Tractors/Loaders/•i 0.0249 0.2822 i 0.1413 � 5.8000e- i i 9.5300e- 9.5300e- 8.7600e- 8.7600e- 0.0000 i 50.8406 50.8406 i 0.0164 i 0.0000 i 51.2516 Backhoes •� 004 003 003 003 003 Total 0.0249 0.2822 0.1413 5.8000e- 9.5300e- 9.5300e- 8.7600e- 8.7600e- 0.0000 50.8406 50.8406 0.0164 0.0000 51.2516 004 003 003 003 003 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer Pennington Industrial (Operations - Trucks) Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Manufacturing 91.14 + 1000sgft ; 2.09 91,140.00 i 0 ----------- -----------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- ;------------- Other Asphalt Surfaces 32.10 + 1000sgft ; 0.74 32,100.00 -+ 0 -------------- --------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- = — — ;------------- ------- Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 19.80 + 1000sgft ; 0.45 19,798.00 -+ 0 -----------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- --------------}------------------ --------------- Parking Lot 164.00 Space T 1.51 65,600.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.4 Precipitation Freq(Days) 28 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2021 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer Project Characteristics - Land Use-Total Project Area is 4.79 acres. Construction Phase- Operations Run Only. Off-road Equipment- Operations Run Only. Trips and VMT- Operations Run Only. Vehicle Trips -Trip Rates are based on information provided in Focused Traffic Evaluation by Urban Crossroads, Inc. Operational Off-Road Equipment- Based on SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Busniess Survey Results (2014) Fleet Mix- Fleet Mix based on information provided in the Trip Generation. Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstruction Phase NumDays 20.00 1.00 ----------------------------_------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix HHD 0.07 0.51 ---------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LDA ? 0.54 0.00 ---------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t------------------------- tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LDT2 0.19 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.26 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LHD2 5.1410e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix MY 4.5820e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- tblFleetMix MDV 0.12 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ---------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix MH ? 1.0380e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix MHD 0.02 0.23 -----------t---- t-- ---------- ------------ -----------------r 1 0.00 ------003 ---------T----------- ----------- BUS r -----------tblFleetMix ----------�------------ SBUS-------------r 9.4500e-004 ---------T----------- 0.00 ----------- r tblFleetMix UBUS 1.1830e-003 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.48 1.51 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblOffRoad Equipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount } 3.00 0.00 tblOffRoad Equipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount } 2.00 0.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperDaysPerYear } 260.00 365.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperFuelType } Diesel CNG tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperHorsePower } 97.00 200.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperHoursPerDay } 8.00 4.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperOffRoad Equ ipmentN umber } 0.00 1.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.43 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.10 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.28 7.55 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.46 0.36 tblVehicleE F HHD i 1.46 2.9270e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD } 6,485.38 1,409.07 tblVehicleEF HHD } 1,461.92 1,350.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.62 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 26.41 7.34 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.69 3.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.04 0.04 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.8000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF HHD 8.8680e-003 8.8980e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF HHD i 3.5000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 8.4000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.5800e-003 1.0300e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.85 0.58 tblVehideEF HHD i 4.8000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.07 0.07 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.8000e-004 5.3700e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.06 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 7.1000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 8.4000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.5800e-003 1.0300e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.97 0.66 tblVehideEF HHD i 4.8000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.11 0.09 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.8000e-004 5.3700e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.35 0.03 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.10 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.39 7.39 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.46 0.36 tblVehideE F HHD i 1.39 2.7700e-003 tblVehideEF HHD 6,867.98 1,402.59 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF HHD 1,461.92 1,350.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF HHD i 4.62 0.03 tblVehideEF HHD i 27.25 7.10 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.54 2.88 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.06 0.06 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.04 0.04 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF HHD i 3.8000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 9.7680e-003 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.03 0.03 tblVehideEF HHD i 8.8680e-003 8.8980e-003 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF HHD i 3.5000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.6300e-004 8.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.9560e-003 1.1800e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.80 0.60 tblVehideEF HHD i 9.2000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.07 0.07 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.8400e-004 5.5600e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.04 1.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.06 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 6.9000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.6300e-004 8.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.9560e-003 1.1800e-004 tblVehideEF HHD 0.92 0.69 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF HHD 9.2000e-005 4.00OOe-006 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF HHD i 0.11 0.09 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.8400e-004 5.5600e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.54 0.03 tblVehicleE F HHD i 0.03 3.2330e-003 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.10 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 4.51 7.76 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.45 0.32 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.47 2.9120e-003 tblVehideEF HHD } 5,957.03 1,414.57 tblVehideEF HHD } 1,461.92 1,340.32 tblVehideEF HHD i 4.62 0.03 tblVehideEF HHD i 25.25 7.65 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.67 3.02 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.02 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.06 0.06 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.04 0.04 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF HHD i 3.8000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.02 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.03 0.03 tblVehideEF HHD i 8.8680e-003 8.8710e-003 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF HHD i 3.5000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 6.7000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehicleE F HHD 2.7490e-003 1.2100e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF HHD 0.91 0.54 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF HHD i 4.1000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.07 0.07 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.9200e-004 5.6500e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.06 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 7.1000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 6.7000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.7490e-003 1.2100e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.05 0.62 tblVehideEF HHD i 4.1000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.11 0.08 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.9200e-004 5.6500e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF LDA i 4.0430e-003 2.4680e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 5.4670e-003 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.58 0.66 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.16 2.12 tblVehideEF LDA i 255.91 265.87 tblVehideEF LDA i 58.81 54.73 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.05 0.04 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.6140e-003 1.4470e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.2650e-003 1.9190e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.4880e-003 1.3330e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.0830e-003 1.7640e-003 tblVehideEF LDA 0.05 0.07 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LDA 0.10 0.10 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.01 9.5180e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.07 0.23 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.5630e-003 2.6300e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 6.0800e-004 5.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.05 0.07 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.10 0.10 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.08 0.25 tblVehideEF LDA i 4.5900e-003 2.8100e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 4.7470e-003 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.71 0.81 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.02 1.87 tblVehideEF LDA i 278.73 289.14 tblVehideEF LDA i 58.81 54.24 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.05 0.04 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.6140e-003 1.4470e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.2650e-003 1.9190e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.4880e-003 1.3330e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.0830e-003 1.7640e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.10 0.14 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.12 0.12 tblVehideEF LDA 0.07 0.10 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.06 0.20 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.7930e-003 2.8600e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 6.0500e-004 5.3700e-004 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.10 0.14 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.12 0.12 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.07 0.10 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.07 0.22 tblVehideEF LDA i 3.8980e-003 2.3810e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 5.6140e-003 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.54 0.62 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.19 2.17 tblVehideEF LDA i 249.57 259.47 tblVehideEF LDA i 58.81 54.82 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.05 0.04 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.6140e-003 1.4470e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.2650e-003 1.9190e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.4880e-003 1.3330e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.0830e-003 1.7640e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.06 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.11 0.11 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.03 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 9.8140e-003 9.1880e-003 tblVehideEF LDA 0.04 0.24 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LDA 0.08 0.23 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDA i 2.4990e-003 2.5670e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 6.0800e-004 5.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.06 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.11 0.11 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.03 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.24 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.08 0.26 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.01 8.0140e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.02 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 1.46 1.62 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 3.40 2.43 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 315.98 317.00 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 72.28 66.64 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.14 0.14 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 2.5300e-003 2.2930e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 3.6970e-003 2.9510e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 2.3290e-003 2.1110e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 3.4000e-003 2.7140e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.21 0.23 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.35 0.27 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.14 0.15 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.03 0.04 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.20 0.87 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.24 0.44 tblVehideEF LDT1 3.1780e-003 3.1370e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LDT1 7.8300e-004 6.5900e-004 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.21 0.23 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.35 0.27 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.14 0.15 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.20 0.87 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.26 0.48 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.01 9.0560e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.02 0.08 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 1.76 1.96 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 2.99 2.15 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 343.19 341.79 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 72.28 66.01 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.13 0.13 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 2.5300e-003 2.2930e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 3.6970e-003 2.9510e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 2.3290e-003 2.1110e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 3.4000e-003 2.7140e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.41 0.44 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.43 0.34 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.27 0.29 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.03 0.04 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.20 0.88 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.21 0.38 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 3.4550e-003 3.3820e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 7.7500e-004 6.5300e-004 tblVehideEF LDT1 0.41 0.44 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.43 0.34 ----------------------------Y---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDT1 0.27 0.29 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.05 0.06 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.20 0.88 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.23 0.42 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.01 7.7080e-003 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.02 0.09 i tblVehideEF LDT1 1.37 1.51 i tblVehideEF LDT1 3.46 2.48 i tblVehideEF LDT1 307.88 309.49 i tblVehideEF LDT1 i 72.28 66.77 tblVehideEF LDT1 0.14 0.14 i tblVehideEF LDT1 2.5300e-003 2.2930e-003 i tblVehideEF LDT1 3.6970e-003 2.9510e-003 i tblVehideEF LDT1 2.3290e-003 2.1110e-003 i tblVehideEF LDT1 3.4000e-003 2.7140e-003 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.18 0.19 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.39 0.30 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.12 0.13 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.03 0.03 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.23 1.01 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.25 0.45 i tblVehideEF LDT1 3.0960e-003 3.0630e-003 i tblVehideEF LDT1 7.8400e-004 6.6100e-004 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.18 0.19 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.39 0.30 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.12 0.13 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 0.05 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.23 1.01 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.27 0.50 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 5.6080e-003 4.2470e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 7.2840e-003 0.07 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.76 0.98 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.53 2.73 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 355.02 338.79 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 81.24 71.51 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.08 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.6030e-003 1.4980e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 2.3320e-003 1.9580e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.4740e-003 1.3790e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 2.1450e-003 1.8010e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.11 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.12 0.14 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.44 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.33 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 3.5560e-003 3.3520e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 8.3800e-004 7.0800e-004 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.11 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.12 0.14 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF LDT2 0.06 0.44 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.11 0.37 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDT2 i 6.3630e-003 4.8280e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 6.3270e-003 0.06 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.93 1.20 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.35 2.42 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 386.34 362.86 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 81.24 70.86 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.08 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.6030e-003 1.4980e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 2.3320e-003 1.9580e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.4740e-003 1.3790e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 2.1450e-003 1.8010e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.22 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.17 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.17 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.44 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.09 0.29 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 3.8710e-003 3.5900e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 8.3500e-004 7.0100e-004 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.22 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.17 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.17 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.44 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.09 0.32 tblVehideEF LDT2 5.3900e-003 4.0760e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LDT2 7.4940e-003 0.07 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.71 0.91 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.57 2.80 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 345.65 331.49 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 81.24 71.65 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.08 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.6030e-003 1.4980e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 2.3320e-003 1.9580e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.4740e-003 1.3790e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 2.1450e-003 1.8010e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.13 0.15 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.05 0.07 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.51 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.34 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 3.4620e-003 3.2800e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 8.3900e-004 7.0900e-004 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.13 0.15 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.05 0.07 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.51 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.11 0.38 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 5.4460e-003 4.8820e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 5.3310e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 0.02 0.02 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.15 0.17 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.96 0.72 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.41 0.96 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.26 9.44 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 607.95 639.95 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 30.36 10.54 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.09 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.21 1.60 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.7200e-004 9.7000e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 8.7100e-004 2.3300e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-004 9.2800e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.5390e-003 2.5010e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 8.0100e-004 2.1400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.8710e-003 3.1780e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 1.9010e-003 1.5570e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.08 0.06 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.31 0.50 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.26 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-005 9.1000e-005 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 5.9620e-003 6.2250e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.4900e-004 1.0400e-004 ---------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------ tblVehideEF LHD1 3.8710e-003 3.1780e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 0.08 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 1.9010e-003 1.5570e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.07 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.31 0.50 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.28 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 5.4460e-003 4.8940e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 5.4200e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.15 0.17 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.97 0.73 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.29 0.92 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.26 9.44 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 607.95 639.97 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 30.36 10.46 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.09 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.08 1.51 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.7200e-004 9.7000e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 8.7100e-004 2.3300e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-004 9.2800e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.5390e-003 2.5010e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 8.0100e-004 2.1400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 7.2450e-003 5.9530e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 0.12 0.09 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.6380e-003 2.9980e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.08 0.06 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.32 0.50 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.25 0.07 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-005 9.1000e-005 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 5.9620e-003 6.2250e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.4700e-004 1.0300e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 7.2450e-003 5.9530e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.12 0.09 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.6380e-003 2.9980e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.32 0.50 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.27 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 5.4460e-003 4.8810e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 5.3180e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.15 0.17 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.96 0.72 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.41 0.96 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.26 9.44 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 607.95 639.95 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 30.36 10.54 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.09 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.18 1.59 tblVehideE F LHD1 9.7200e-004 9.7000e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 8.7100e-004 2.3300e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-004 9.2800e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.5390e-003 2.5010e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 8.0100e-004 2.1400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.4570e-003 2.8250e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.11 0.09 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 1.7350e-003 1.4150e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.08 0.06 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.33 0.53 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.26 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-005 9.1000e-005 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 5.9620e-003 6.2250e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.4900e-004 1.0400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.4570e-003 2.8250e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.11 0.09 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 1.7350e-003 1.4150e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.07 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.33 0.53 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.28 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.6660e-003 3.1720e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 4.5290e-003 3.8570e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 8.3110e-003 9.0280e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.12 0.13 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.50 0.53 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.15 0.56 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 14.48 14.86 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 604.20 638.83 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 23.56 7.29 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.12 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.71 1.77 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.3360e-003 1.4390e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.8700e-004 1.1400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.2780e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.6970e-003 2.7110e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.5600e-004 1.0500e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.4980e-003 1.6870e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.04 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 7.7800e-004 8.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.06 0.06 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.11 0.04 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.4100e-004 1.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 5.8740e-003 6.1550e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.5700e-004 7.2000e-005 ---------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------ tblVehideEF LHD2 1.4980e-003 1.6870e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.04 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 7.7800e-004 8.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.07 0.07 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.05 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.6660e-003 3.1790e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 4.5800e-003 3.8860e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 8.0210e-003 8.7250e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.13 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.51 0.53 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.10 0.53 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 14.48 14.86 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 604.20 638.83 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 23.56 7.25 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.12 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.62 1.67 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.3360e-003 1.4390e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.8700e-004 1.1400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.2780e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.6970e-003 2.7110e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.5600e-004 1.0500e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.8320e-003 3.1830e-003 ---------------------------- ------------------------- ---------------- ---------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD2 0.04 0.05 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.02 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.4720e-003 1.6130e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.06 0.06 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.11 0.04 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.4100e-004 1.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 5.8740e-003 6.1560e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.5600e-004 7.2000e-005 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.8320e-003 3.1830e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.4720e-003 1.6130e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.07 0.07 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.05 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.6660e-003 3.1700e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 4.5170e-003 3.8490e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 8.3600e-003 9.0930e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.13 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.50 0.53 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.16 0.56 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 14.48 14.86 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 604.20 638.83 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 23.56 7.30 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.12 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.70 1.75 tblVehideEF LHD2 1.3360e-003 1.4390e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.8700e-004 1.1400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.2780e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.6970e-003 2.7110e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.5600e-004 1.0500e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.1910e-003 1.3290e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 6.6000e-004 7.0100e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.06 0.06 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.27 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.11 0.04 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.4100e-004 1.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 5.8740e-003 6.1550e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.5700e-004 7.2000e-005 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.1910e-003 1.3290e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 6.6000e-004 7.0100e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.07 0.07 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.27 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.05 tblVehideEF MY i 0.42 0.32 tblVehideEF MY i 0.15 0.24 tblVehideEF MY 19.52 19.61 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MY 9.67 8.55 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MY i 165.74 208.30 tblVehideEF MY i 46.23 60.73 tblVehideEF MY i 1.13 1.13 tblVehideEF MY i 1.7750e-003 1.7570e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 3.4010e-003 2.8660e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 1.6600e-003 1.6440e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 3.2060e-003 2.7000e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 1.69 1.66 tblVehideEF MY i 0.85 0.84 tblVehideEF MY i 0.92 0.90 tblVehideEF MY i 2.15 2.16 tblVehideEF MY i 0.57 1.87 tblVehideEF MY i 2.08 1.83 tblVehideEF MY i 2.0380e-003 2.0610e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 6.8100e-004 6.0100e-004 tblVehideEF MY i 1.69 1.66 tblVehideEF MY i 0.85 0.84 tblVehideEF MY i 0.92 0.90 tblVehideEF MY i 2.65 2.65 tblVehideEF MY i 0.57 1.87 tblVehideEF MY i 2.26 1.99 tblVehideEF MY i 0.42 0.32 tblVehideEF MY i 0.14 0.22 tblVehideEF MY i 20.23 20.27 tblVehideEF MY i 9.11 8.00 tblVehideEF MY 165.74 209.26 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MY 46.23 59.19 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MY i 0.98 0.98 tblVehideEF MY i 1.7750e-003 1.7570e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 3.4010e-003 2.8660e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 1.6600e-003 1.6440e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 3.2060e-003 2.7000e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 3.35 3.28 tblVehideEF MY i 1.24 1.23 tblVehideEF MY i 2.10 2.05 tblVehideEF MY i 2.13 2.13 tblVehideEF MY i 0.57 1.86 tblVehideEF MY i 1.86 1.63 tblVehideEF MY i 2.0490e-003 2.0710e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 6.6500e-004 5.8600e-004 tblVehideEF MY i 3.35 3.28 tblVehideEF MY i 1.24 1.23 tblVehideEF MY i 2.10 2.05 tblVehideEF MY i 2.62 2.63 tblVehideEF MY i 0.57 1.86 tblVehideEF MY i 2.02 1.77 tblVehideEF MY i 0.42 0.32 tblVehideEF MY i 0.15 0.24 tblVehideEF MY i 19.04 19.14 tblVehideEF MY i 9.62 8.49 tblVehideEF MY i 165.74 207.52 tblVehideEF MY i 46.23 60.64 tblVehideEF MY 1.12 1.12 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MY 1.7750e-003 1.7570e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MY i 3.4010e-003 2.8660e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 1.6600e-003 1.6440e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 3.2060e-003 2.7000e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 1.60 1.59 tblVehideEF MY i 1.05 1.04 tblVehideEF MY i 0.74 0.73 tblVehideEF MY i 2.15 2.15 tblVehideEF MY i 0.65 2.12 tblVehideEF MY i 2.08 1.83 tblVehideEF MY i 2.0310e-003 2.0540e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 6.8100e-004 6.00OOe-004 tblVehideEF MY i 1.60 1.59 tblVehideEF MY i 1.05 1.04 tblVehideEF MY i 0.74 0.73 tblVehideEF MY i 2.64 2.65 tblVehideEF MY i 0.65 2.12 tblVehideEF MY i 2.27 1.99 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.01 5.7580e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.02 0.09 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.42 1.20 tblVehideEF MDV i 3.18 3.27 tblVehideEF MDV i 488.89 421.49 tblVehideEF MDV i 110.15 88.73 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.17 0.12 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.7110e-003 1.5730e-003 tblVehideEF MDV 2.4630e-003 2.0550e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MDV 1.5780e-003 1.4510e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MDV i 2.2660e-003 1.8910e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.11 0.13 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.20 0.17 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.09 0.11 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.03 0.03 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.25 0.45 tblVehideEF MDV i 4.9000e-003 4.1680e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.1570e-003 8.7800e-004 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.11 0.13 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.20 0.17 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.09 0.11 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.05 0.04 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.27 0.49 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.01 6.5120e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.02 0.08 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.73 1.46 tblVehideEF MDV i 2.81 2.88 tblVehideEF MDV i 530.71 447.07 tblVehideEF MDV i 110.15 87.92 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.16 0.11 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.7110e-003 1.5730e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 2.4630e-003 2.0550e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.5780e-003 1.4510e-003 tblVehideEF MDV 2.2660e-003 1.8910e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MDV 0.22 0.26 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MDV i 0.23 0.20 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.17 0.21 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.04 0.03 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.21 0.39 tblVehideEF MDV i 5.3230e-003 4.4210e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.1510e-003 8.7000e-004 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.22 0.26 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.23 0.20 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.17 0.21 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.05 0.04 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.23 0.43 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.01 5.5370e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.02 0.09 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.33 1.12 tblVehideEF MDV i 3.24 3.34 tblVehideEF MDV i 476.42 413.84 tblVehideEF MDV i 110.15 88.88 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.16 0.12 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.7110e-003 1.5730e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 2.4630e-003 2.0550e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.5780e-003 1.4510e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 2.2660e-003 1.8910e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.09 0.10 tblVehideEF MDV 0.21 0.18 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MDV 0.08 0.10 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MDV i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.13 0.57 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.25 0.46 tblVehideEF MDV i 4.7750e-003 4.0920e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.1590e-003 8.8000e-004 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.09 0.10 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.21 0.18 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.08 0.10 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.05 0.03 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.13 0.57 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.28 0.50 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 3.3370e-003 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 2.70 0.34 tblVehideEF MH i 5.98 0.00 tblVehideEF MH } 1,002.10 941.76 tblVehideEF MH i 57.67 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.67 4.43 tblVehideEF MH i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehideEF MH i 1.0860e-003 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 3.2460e-003 4.00OOe-003 tblVehideEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehideEF MH i 9.9800e-004 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.56 0.00 tblVehideEF MH 0.08 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MH 0.54 0.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MH i 0.09 0.07 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.35 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 9.9460e-003 8.9030e-003 tblVehideEF MH i 6.8100e-004 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.56 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.08 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.54 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.13 0.08 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.39 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 3.3370e-003 tblVehideEF MH i 0.02 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 2.78 0.34 tblVehideEF MH i 5.56 0.00 tblVehideEF MH } 1,002.10 941.76 tblVehideEF MH i 57.67 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.55 4.18 tblVehideEF MH i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehideEF MH i 1.0860e-003 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 3.2460e-003 4.00OOe-003 tblVehideEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehideEF MH i 9.980Oe-004 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 2.87 0.00 tblVehideEF MH 0.10 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MH 1.06 0.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MH i 0.10 0.07 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.34 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 9.9470e-003 8.9030e-003 tblVehideEF MH i 6.7400e-004 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 2.87 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.10 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.06 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.13 0.08 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.37 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 3.3370e-003 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 2.70 0.34 tblVehideEF MH i 6.02 0.00 tblVehideEF MH } 1,002.10 941.76 tblVehideEF MH i 57.67 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.65 4.38 tblVehideEF MH i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehideEF MH i 1.0860e-003 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 3.2460e-003 4.00OOe-003 tblVehideEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehideEF MH i 9.9800e-004 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.58 0.00 tblVehideEF MH 0.10 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MH 0.53 0.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MH i 0.09 0.07 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.35 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 9.9460e-003 8.9030e-003 tblVehideEF MH i 6.8200e-004 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.58 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.10 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.53 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.13 0.08 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.39 0.00 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 3.1500e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 3.7220e-003 5.9790e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.06 8.4870e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.35 0.34 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.28 0.57 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.06 1.01 tblVehideEF MHD i 151.96 74.93 tblVehideEF MHD } 1,066.63 1,001.03 tblVehideEF MHD i 55.49 8.18 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.65 0.69 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.99 2.37 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.0680e-003 2.4180e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.4490e-003 0.08 tblVehideEF MHD i 7.8800e-004 9.6000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD 1.0220e-003 2.3130e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MHD 6.1670e-003 0.08 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MHD i 7.2400e-004 8.8000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.7450e-003 7.1900e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.05 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 8.5800e-004 3.5500e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.03 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 0.10 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.37 0.05 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.4610e-003 7.1000e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.01 9.5290e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.6100e-004 8.1000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.7450e-003 7.1900e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.05 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.04 0.03 tblVehideEF MHD i 8.5800e-004 3.5500e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.04 0.12 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 0.10 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.40 0.05 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 2.9880e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 3.7740e-003 6.0080e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.05 8.2030e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.26 0.28 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.28 0.57 tblVehideEF MHD i 5.78 0.96 tblVehideEF MHD i 160.96 76.44 tblVehideEF MHD 1,066.63 1,001.04 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MHD 55.49 8.10 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MHD i 0.67 0.70 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.93 2.23 tblVehideEF MHD i 9.00OOe-004 2.0410e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.4490e-003 0.08 tblVehideEF MHD i 7.8800e-004 9.6000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 8.6100e-004 1.9530e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.1670e-003 0.08 tblVehideEF MHD i 7.2400e-004 8.8000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 3.3760e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.06 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.6840e-003 7.0100e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.03 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.36 0.04 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.5460e-003 7.2500e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.01 9.5290e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.5600e-004 8.00OOe-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 3.3760e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.06 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.04 0.03 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.6840e-003 7.0100e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.04 0.12 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.39 0.05 tblVehideEF MHD 0.02 3.3820e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MHD 3.6890e-003 5.9600e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehideEF MHD i 0.06 8.5610e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.49 0.43 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.27 0.57 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.14 1.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 139.53 72.84 tblVehideEF MHD } 1,066.63 1,001.03 tblVehideEF MHD i 55.49 8.20 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.62 0.67 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.98 2.35 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.2990e-003 2.9380e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.4490e-003 0.08 tblVehideEF MHD i 7.8800e-004 9.6000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.2430e-003 2.8110e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.1670e-003 0.08 tblVehideEF MHD i 7.2400e-004 8.8000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.3320e-003 5.6300e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.05 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.7900e-004 2.8800e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.03 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.37 0.05 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.3440e-003 6.9100e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.01 9.5290e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.6300e-004 8.1000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD 1.3320e-003 5.6300e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MHD i 0.04 0.03 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.7900e-004 2.8800e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.04 0.12 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.41 0.05 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.01 8.9240e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.0950e-003 8.5070e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.27 0.50 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.54 0.93 tblVehideEF OBUS i 6.17 2.58 tblVehideEF OBUS i 75.04 73.28 tblVehideEF OBUS } 1,098.07 1,407.22 tblVehideEF OBUS i 70.10 20.86 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.35 0.44 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.12 1.70 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.2100e-004 1.7750e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 6.0450e-003 0.04 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.2300e-004 1.9000e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.1600e-004 1.6990e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 5.7680e-003 0.04 tblVehideEF OBUS i 7.5700e-004 1.7400e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 2.1800e-003 2.5990e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF OBUS 9.3000e-004 1.1120e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.09 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.39 0.12 tblVehideEF OBUS i 7.2800e-004 6.9900e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.0900e-004 2.0600e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 2.1800e-003 2.5990e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.07 tblVehideEF OBUS i 9.3000e-004 1.1120e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.11 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.42 0.14 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.01 8.9470e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.2540e-003 8.6370e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.26 0.48 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.55 0.94 tblVehideEF OBUS i 5.76 2.41 tblVehideEF OBUS i 78.48 73.81 tblVehideEF OBUS } 1,098.07 1,407.25 tblVehideEF OBUS i 70.10 20.57 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.36 0.45 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.04 1.59 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.0200e-004 1.5000e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 6.0450e-003 0.04 tblVehideEF OBUS 8.2300e-004 1.9000e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.8000e-005 1.4350e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF OBUS i 5.7680e-003 0.04 tblVehideEF OBUS i 7.5700e-004 1.7400e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 4.0690e-003 4.7330e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.7890e-003 2.1320e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.04 0.09 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.37 0.12 tblVehideEF OBUS i 7.6100e-004 7.0400e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.0200e-004 2.0400e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 4.0690e-003 4.7330e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.07 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.7890e-003 2.1320e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.11 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.40 0.13 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.01 8.9200e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.0660e-003 8.4690e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.28 0.53 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.54 0.92 tblVehideEF OBUS i 6.22 2.60 tblVehideEF OBUS 70.30 72.56 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,098.07 1,407.21 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF OBUS i 70.10 20.90 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.34 0.44 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.11 1.68 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.4700e-004 2.1560e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 6.0450e-003 0.04 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.2300e-004 1.9000e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.4100e-004 2.0620e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 5.7680e-003 0.04 tblVehideEF OBUS i 7.5700e-004 1.7400e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.8870e-003 2.3830e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.5400e-004 1.0620e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.04 0.09 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.27 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.39 0.13 tblVehideEF OBUS i 6.8300e-004 6.9200e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.1000e-004 2.0700e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.8870e-003 2.3830e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.07 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.5400e-004 1.0620e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.11 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.27 tblVehideEF OBUS 0.42 0.14 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.84 0.08 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 6.6110e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.06 6.9670e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 7.83 3.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.64 0.53 tblVehideEF SBUS i 6.66 0.94 tblVehideEF SBUS } 1,146.29 366.87 tblVehideEF SBUS } 1,103.40 1,115.27 tblVehideEF SBUS i 53.92 6.06 tblVehideEF SBUS i 10.00 3.57 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.65 4.82 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 4.0660e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 0.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.5700e-004 4.00OOe-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 3.890Oe-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.6950e-003 2.651Oe-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.200Oe-004 3.600Oe-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.6830e-003 1.3080e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 8.6250e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.94 0.36 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.1770e-003 6.250Oe-004 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.11 0.10 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.37 0.04 tblVehideEF SBUS 0.01 3.5040e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehideEF SBUS i 6.5500e-004 6.00OOe-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.6830e-003 1.3080e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 8.6250e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 1.35 0.52 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.1770e-003 6.2500e-004 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.13 0.11 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.40 0.04 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.84 0.08 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 6.6860e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.05 5.8380e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 7.71 2.99 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.65 0.54 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.83 0.68 tblVehideEF SBUS } 1,198.60 377.09 tblVehideEF SBUS } 1,103.40 1,115.28 tblVehideEF SBUS i 53.92 5.63 tblVehideEF SBUS i 10.32 3.66 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.37 4.53 tblVehideEF SBUS i 9.1190e-003 3.4340e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 0.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.5700e-004 4.00OOe-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 8.7240e-003 3.2850e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.6950e-003 2.6510e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS 0.02 0.03 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.2000e-004 3.6000e-005 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF SBUS i 8.4640e-003 2.3620e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 9.1440e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.93 0.36 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.0830e-003 1.1650e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.11 0.10 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.31 0.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 3.6000e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF SBUS i 6.2400e-004 5.6000e-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 8.4640e-003 2.3620e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 9.1440e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 1.35 0.52 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.0830e-003 1.1650e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.13 0.11 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.34 0.04 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.84 0.08 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 6.6040e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.07 7.2110e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 8.00 3.09 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.63 0.53 tblVehideEF SBUS i 7.02 0.98 tblVehideEF SBUS } 1,074.07 352.76 tblVehideEF SBUS } 1,103.40 1,115.26 ---------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------------------ -------------------------- tblVehideEF SBUS 53.92 6.14 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.56 3.44 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.60 4.78 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 4.9380e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 0.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.5700e-004 4.00OOe-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 4.7240e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.6950e-003 2.6510e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.2000e-004 3.6000e-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.1680e-003 1.1480e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 8.8290e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.94 0.36 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.1000e-003 6.0300e-004 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.11 0.10 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.02 0.06 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.38 0.04 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 3.3710e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF SBUS i 6.6100e-004 6.1000e-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.1680e-003 1.1480e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 8.8290e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 1.35 0.52 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.1000e-003 6.0300e-004 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.13 0.11 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.02 0.06 tblVehideEF SBUS 0.41 0.05 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.51 3.35 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.09 0.02 tblVehideEF UBUS i 8.45 26.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 15.26 1.50 tblVehideEF UBUS } 1,822.40 1,617.71 tblVehideEF UBUS i 153.45 18.08 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.95 0.32 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.50 0.09 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.06 2.9340e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.4200e-003 1.6100e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.21 0.04 tblVehideEF UBUS i 3.00OOe-003 5.4780e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.05 2.7920e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.3060e-003 1.4800e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 9.7430e-003 1.6370e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.11 9.7740e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.7860e-003 7.1300e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.52 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.17 0.07 tblVehideEF UBUS i 9.9960e-003 4.8690e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.8100e-003 1.7900e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 9.7430e-003 1.6370e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.11 9.7740e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.7860e-003 7.1300e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS 2.08 3.43 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 45 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.05 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.28 0.08 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.52 3.35 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.08 0.02 tblVehideEF UBUS i 8.53 26.06 tblVehideEF UBUS i 13.06 1.28 tblVehideEF UBUS } 1,822.40 1,617.72 tblVehideEF UBUS i 153.45 17.70 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.62 0.31 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.50 0.09 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.06 2.9340e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.4200e-003 1.6100e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.21 0.04 tblVehideEF UBUS i 3.00OOe-003 5.4780e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.05 2.7920e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.3060e-003 1.4800e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.02 2.9250e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.14 0.01 tblVehideEF UBUS i 9.6600e-003 1.4550e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.53 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.06 0.07 tblVehideEF UBUS i 9.9970e-003 4.8690e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.7720e-003 1.7500e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.02 2.9250e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS 0.14 0.01 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 46 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF UBUS 9.6600e-003 1.4550e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF UBUS i 2.09 3.43 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.17 0.07 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.51 3.35 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.09 0.02 tblVehideEF UBUS i 8.44 26.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 15.44 1.49 tblVehideEF UBUS } 1,822.40 1,617.71 tblVehideEF UBUS i 153.45 18.06 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.92 0.31 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.50 0.09 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.06 2.9340e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.4200e-003 1.6100e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.21 0.04 tblVehideEF UBUS i 3.00OOe-003 5.4780e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.05 2.7920e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.3060e-003 1.4800e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 8.9770e-003 1.7200e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.13 0.01 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.3820e-003 7.5400e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.52 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.03 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.18 0.07 tblVehideEF UBUS i 9.9960e-003 4.8690e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS 1.8130e-003 1.7900e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 47 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleEF UBUS 8.9770e-003 1.7200e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.13 0.01 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.3820e-003 7.5400e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 2.08 3.43 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.03 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.29 0.08 tblVehideTrips CC_TTP } 28.00 0.00 tblVehideTrips CNW_TTP } 13.00 0.00 tblVehideTrips CW_TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehideTrips CW_TTP } 59.00 100.00 tblVehideTrips DV_TP } 5.00 0.00 tblVehideTrips PB_TP } 3.00 0.00 tblVehideTrips PR_TP } 92.00 100.00 tblVehideTrips ST_TR } 1.49 0.77 tblVehideTrips SU_TR } 0.62 0.77 ---------------------------- ------------------------------:------------------------------ -------------------------- tblVehideTrips WD_TR 3.82 0.77 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 48 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Year lb/day lb/day 2020 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0. 0000 0.0000 0.0 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 11 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Year lb/day lb/day 2020 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 49 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 2.0896 i 2.9000e- i 0.0315 i 0.0000 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- i i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 i 1.8000e- 0.0717 i 004 004 i 004 004 004 � i � i 004 � ------ -------------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j---------------_-------I-------j-------j-------I-------*------- Energy i 0.0875 i 0.7954 i 0.6681 i 4.7700e- 0.0605 i 0.0605 i i 0.0605 0.0605 � i 954.4363 : 954.4363 i 0.0183 0.0175 960.1080 003 Mobile •i 0.5521 i 17.2962 i 3.8090 i 0.0645 2.5015 0.3053 i 2.8068 i 0.7064 i 0.2921 0.9984 i 6,816.243 6,816.243 i 0.0759 1 6,818.141 8 i 8 i i i 2 ---- ---- ��-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------�---------------_---- --� ------�-------�-------�-------*---- - Offroad •i 0.1367 i 1.5461 i 0.7740 � 3.1700e- i i 0.0522 i 0.0522 i i 0.0480 0.0480 � i 307.0801 i 307.0801 i 0.0993 309.5630 003 Total 2.8658 19.6379 5.2825 0.0724 2.5015 0.4181 2.9196 0.7064 0.4006 1.1070 8,077.827 17077.827 0.1937 1 0.0175 8,087.883 4 4 9 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 50 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 2.0896 i 2.9000e- 0.0315 i 0.0000 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- i 0.0672 � 0.0672 i 1.8000e- 0.0717 004 004 004 004 004 004 i Energy •i 0.0875 i 0.7954 0.6681 i 4.7700e- 0.0605 i 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 i 954.4363 954.4363 i 0.0183 0.0175 960.1080 003 Mobile •i 0.5521 i 17.2962 3.8090 i 0.0645 2.5015 0.3053 i 2.8068 0.7064 i 0.2921 0.9984 i 6,816.243 6,816.243 i 0.0759 6,818.141 Offroad •i 0.1367 i 1.5461 0.7740 i 3.1700e- 0.0522 i 0.0522 0.0480 0.0480 i 307.0801 307.0801 i 0.0993 309.5630 003 Total 2.8658 19.6379 5.2825 0.0724 2.5015 0.4181 2.9196 0.7064 0.4006 1.1070 8,077.827 8,077.827 0.1937 0.0175 7,087.883 4 4 9 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 ;Demolition *Demolition :1/6/2020 1/6/2020 5' 1. Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 51 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer Acres of Paving: 2.7 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating—sgft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 01 8.001 81, 0.73 ---------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------ -------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators ; 01 8.001 158, 0.38 Demolition -Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00: 247: 0.40 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip I Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 0. 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00,LD Mix HDT Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 52 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I i 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 =00000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day I I I I I I I I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;� I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • � 1 1 I I •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I r I 1 1 II 0.0000Vendo 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I • 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Worker •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I 17.1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 53 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I i 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 =00000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day I I I I I I I I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;� I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • � 1 1 I I •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I r I 1 1 II 0.0000Vendo 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I • 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Worker •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I 17.1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 54 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated �� 0.5521 i 17.2962 i 3.8090 0.0645 i 2.5015 0.3053 2.8068 i 0.7064 0.2921 0.9984 � i 6,816.243 6,816.243 0.0759 i i 6,818.141 i i i i i i i i 8 8 i 2 Unmitigated 0.5521 17.2962 3.8090 0.0645 2.5015 0.3053 2.8068 0.7064 0.2921 0.9984 6,816.243 6,816.243 0.0759 6,818.141 8 8 2 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Manufacturing ; 70.18 ; 70.18 70.18 1,021,789 1,021,789 ....................................................------------T-----------Y------------------------II;-------------------------- Other Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 ................................................... ---------- ----------- ---------------------- ------------------------r Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 ......................................------------ -r----------- ---------- ---------------------- ----------------------- Parking Lot ; 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 70.18 70.18 70.18 1,021,789 1,021,789 4.3 Trip Type Information CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 55 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Manufacturing 40.00 8.40 6.90 100.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 ........................------------------__ __ ___ _ -- ---- ------------- Other Non Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 ? 6.90 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0 0 0 .......................r----------------------- -------- --------- -------- ----------------- Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Manufacturing 0.000000i 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.264000; 0.000000; 0.228000; 0.508000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000- 0.000000 i i---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------t---------------i---------------i----------------i----------------i---------------- -------- Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.5421161 0.0375781 0.1852031 0.1185031 0.0162411 0.0051411 0.0173921 0.0686951 0.0013831 0.0011831 0.0045821 0.000945. 0.001038 i i i---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------t---------------i---------------i---------------i----------------i----------------i---------------- -------- OtherNon-AsphaltSurfaces 0.5421161 0.0375781 0.1852031 0.1185031 0.0162411 0.0051411 0.0173921 0.0686951 0.0013831 0.0011831 0.0045821 0.000945, 0.001038 i i i i i Parking Lot 0.542116. 0.037578, 0.185203, 0.118503, 0.016241, 0.005141, 0.017392, 0.068695, 0.001383, 0.001183, 0.004582, 0.000945, 0.001038 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 56 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day I I I I I I I I I 1 I NaturalGas •I 0.0875 I 0.7954 I 0.6681 1 4.7700e- I 1 0.0605 I 0.0605 I 1 0.0605 0.0605 954.4363 1954.4363 I 0.0183 I 0.0175 � 960.1080 Mitigated 003 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I 1 I NaturalGas 0.0875 0.7954 0.6681 4.7700e- - 0.0605 • 0.0605 - 0.0605 0.0605 954.4363 • 954.4363 0.0183 0.0175 960.1080 Unmitigated 003 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I Manufacturing � 8112.71 4 0.0875 I 0.7954 I 0.6681 14.7700e- I I 0.0605 I 0.0605 I I 0.0605 0.0605 954.4363 1954.4363 I 0.0183 I 0.0175 i 960.1080 I 1 1 003 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I q ------- ------- ------- -------�------- ------- -------j------- -------I------- ------- ------- ------- I ----------- ----- - --�I------- I I I I I I I I I I I I *------ Other Asphalt 0 .1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces 'I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 • I 1 I I --�I ---- I I I I I I I I I I I I *------ Other Non- I 0 ■1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 0.0000 • I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 • 1 I I - -I I I I I I I I 1 � I I I I *------- Parking Lot 0 •1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I '1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 • 1 1 I I I Total 0.0875 0.7954 0.6681 4.7700e- 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 954.4363 954.4363 0.0183 0.0175 960.1080 11 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 57 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Manufacturing 8.11271 •i 0.0875 i 0.7954 � 0.6681 4.7700e- 0.0605 i 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 i 954.4363 954.4363 i 0.0183 i 0.0175 960.1080 003 Other Asphalt i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Surfaces Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces Parking Lot i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0875 0.7954 0.6681 4.7700e- 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 077 954.4363 954.4363 0.0183 0.0175 960.1080 11 003 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 58 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 2.0896 i 2.9000e- i 0.0315 i 0.0000 i i 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- i i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 � 0.0672 i 1.8000e- � i 0.0717 •� 004 004 004 004 004 . 004 i ••____-��--------------+__......------}....------....}----._...._.__+......------..}..------......+__._....---------------------}----._......--*-''---- ____•__ -----------------------------}____......_.__----------------____.. Unmitigated 2.0896 2.9000e- 0.0315 0.0000 - 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 - 1.8000e- 0.0717 004 004 004 004 004 004 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 0.2404 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating -----------%------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- --------------- -------I------- ------- ------- -------*------- Consumer •i 1.8462 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � i � 0.0000 i � i 0.0000 Products Landscaping •i 2.9400e- i 2.9000e- 0.0315 i 0.0000 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 i 1.8000e- 0.0717 003 004 004 004 004 004 004 i Total 2.0896 2.9000e- 0.0315 0.0000 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 1.8000e- 0.0717 004 004 004 004 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 59 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 0.2404 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •1 1.8462 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping •i 2.9400e- i 2.9000e- � 0.0315 i 0.0000 i � 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- � i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- � i 0.0672 � 0.0672 i 1.8000e- � � 0.0717 003 004 004 004 004 004 004 i Total 2.0896 2.9000e- 0.0315 0.0000 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 1.8000e- 0.0717 004 004 004 004 004 004 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1• 4.00, 365, 200, 0.37-CNG CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 60 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer UnMitigated/Mitigated ROG NOx I CO S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Equipment Type lb/day lb/day Tractors/Loaders/•i 0.1367 1.5461 i 0.7740 3.1700e- 0.0522 i 0.0522 0.0480 0.0480 307.0801 307.0801 0.0993 309.5630 Backhoes •� 003 Total 0.1367 1.5461 0.7740 3.1700e- 0.0522 0.0522 0.0480 0.0480 307.0801 307.0801 0.0993 309.5630 003 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter Pennington Industrial (Operations - Trucks) Riverside-South Coast County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Manufacturing 91.14 + 1000sgft ; 2.09 91,140.00 i 0 ----------- -----------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- ;------------- Other Asphalt Surfaces 32.10 + 1000sgft ; 0.74 32,100.00 -+ 0 -------------- --------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- = — — ;------------- ------- Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 19.80 + 1000sgft ; 0.45 19,798.00 -+ 0 -----------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- --------------}------------------ --------------- Parking Lot 164.00 Space T 1.51 65,600.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.4 Precipitation Freq(Days) 28 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2021 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter Project Characteristics - Land Use-Total Project Area is 4.79 acres. Construction Phase- Operations Run Only. Off-road Equipment- Operations Run Only. Trips and VMT- Operations Run Only. Vehicle Trips -Trip Rates are based on information provided in Focused Traffic Evaluation by Urban Crossroads, Inc. Operational Off-Road Equipment- Based on SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Busniess Survey Results (2014) Fleet Mix- Fleet Mix based on information provided in the Trip Generation. Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstruction Phase NumDays 20.00 1.00 ----------------------------_------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix HHD 0.07 0.51 ---------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LDA ? 0.54 0.00 ---------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t------------------------- tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LDT2 0.19 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.26 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LHD2 5.1410e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix MY 4.5820e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- tblFleetMix MDV 0.12 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ---------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix MH ? 1.0380e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix MHD 0.02 0.23 -----------t---- t-- ---------- ------------ -----------------r 1 0.00 ------003 ---------T----------- ----------- BUS r -----------tblFleetMix ----------�------------ SBUS-------------r 9.4500e-004 ---------T----------- 0.00 ----------- r tblFleetMix UBUS 1.1830e-003 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.48 1.51 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblOffRoad Equipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount } 3.00 0.00 tblOffRoad Equipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount } 2.00 0.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperDaysPerYear } 260.00 365.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperFuelType } Diesel CNG tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperHorsePower } 97.00 200.00 tblOperationalOffRoad Equipment OperHoursPerDay } 8.00 4.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperOffRoad Equ ipmentN umber } 0.00 1.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.43 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.10 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.28 7.55 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.46 0.36 tblVehicleE F HHD i 1.46 2.9270e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD } 6,485.38 1,409.07 tblVehicleEF HHD } 1,461.92 1,350.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.62 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 26.41 7.34 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.69 3.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.04 0.04 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.8000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF HHD 8.8680e-003 8.8980e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF HHD i 3.5000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 8.4000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.5800e-003 1.0300e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.85 0.58 tblVehideEF HHD i 4.8000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.07 0.07 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.8000e-004 5.3700e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.06 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 7.1000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 8.4000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.5800e-003 1.0300e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.97 0.66 tblVehideEF HHD i 4.8000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.11 0.09 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.8000e-004 5.3700e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.35 0.03 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.10 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.39 7.39 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.46 0.36 tblVehideE F HHD i 1.39 2.7700e-003 tblVehideEF HHD 6,867.98 1,402.59 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF HHD 1,461.92 1,350.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF HHD i 4.62 0.03 tblVehideEF HHD i 27.25 7.10 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.54 2.88 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.06 0.06 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.04 0.04 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF HHD i 3.8000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 9.7680e-003 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.03 0.03 tblVehideEF HHD i 8.8680e-003 8.8980e-003 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF HHD i 3.5000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.6300e-004 8.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.9560e-003 1.1800e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.80 0.60 tblVehideEF HHD i 9.2000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.07 0.07 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.8400e-004 5.5600e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.04 1.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.06 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 6.9000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.6300e-004 8.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.9560e-003 1.1800e-004 tblVehideEF HHD 0.92 0.69 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF HHD 9.2000e-005 4.00OOe-006 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF HHD i 0.11 0.09 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.8400e-004 5.5600e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.54 0.03 tblVehicleE F HHD i 0.03 3.2330e-003 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.10 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 4.51 7.76 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.45 0.32 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.47 2.9120e-003 tblVehideEF HHD } 5,957.03 1,414.57 tblVehideEF HHD } 1,461.92 1,340.32 tblVehideEF HHD i 4.62 0.03 tblVehideEF HHD i 25.25 7.65 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.67 3.02 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.02 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.06 0.06 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.04 0.04 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF HHD i 3.8000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.02 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.03 0.03 tblVehideEF HHD i 8.8680e-003 8.8710e-003 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF HHD i 3.5000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 6.7000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehicleE F HHD 2.7490e-003 1.2100e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF HHD 0.91 0.54 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF HHD i 4.1000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.07 0.07 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.9200e-004 5.6500e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.06 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 7.1000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 6.7000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.7490e-003 1.2100e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.05 0.62 tblVehideEF HHD i 4.1000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.11 0.08 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.9200e-004 5.6500e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF LDA i 4.0430e-003 2.4680e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 5.4670e-003 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.58 0.66 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.16 2.12 tblVehideEF LDA i 255.91 265.87 tblVehideEF LDA i 58.81 54.73 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.05 0.04 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.6140e-003 1.4470e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.2650e-003 1.9190e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.4880e-003 1.3330e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.0830e-003 1.7640e-003 tblVehideEF LDA 0.05 0.07 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LDA 0.10 0.10 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.01 9.5180e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.07 0.23 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.5630e-003 2.6300e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 6.0800e-004 5.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.05 0.07 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.10 0.10 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.08 0.25 tblVehideEF LDA i 4.5900e-003 2.8100e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 4.7470e-003 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.71 0.81 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.02 1.87 tblVehideEF LDA i 278.73 289.14 tblVehideEF LDA i 58.81 54.24 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.05 0.04 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.6140e-003 1.4470e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.2650e-003 1.9190e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.4880e-003 1.3330e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.0830e-003 1.7640e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.10 0.14 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.12 0.12 tblVehideEF LDA 0.07 0.10 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.06 0.20 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.7930e-003 2.8600e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 6.0500e-004 5.3700e-004 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.10 0.14 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.12 0.12 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.07 0.10 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.07 0.22 tblVehideEF LDA i 3.8980e-003 2.3810e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 5.6140e-003 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.54 0.62 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.19 2.17 tblVehideEF LDA i 249.57 259.47 tblVehideEF LDA i 58.81 54.82 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.05 0.04 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.6140e-003 1.4470e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.2650e-003 1.9190e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.4880e-003 1.3330e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.0830e-003 1.7640e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.06 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.11 0.11 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.03 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 9.8140e-003 9.1880e-003 tblVehideEF LDA 0.04 0.24 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LDA 0.08 0.23 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDA i 2.4990e-003 2.5670e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 6.0800e-004 5.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.06 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.11 0.11 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.03 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.24 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.08 0.26 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.01 8.0140e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.02 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 1.46 1.62 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 3.40 2.43 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 315.98 317.00 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 72.28 66.64 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.14 0.14 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 2.5300e-003 2.2930e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 3.6970e-003 2.9510e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 2.3290e-003 2.1110e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 3.4000e-003 2.7140e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.21 0.23 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.35 0.27 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.14 0.15 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.03 0.04 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.20 0.87 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.24 0.44 tblVehideEF LDT1 3.1780e-003 3.1370e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LDT1 7.8300e-004 6.5900e-004 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.21 0.23 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.35 0.27 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.14 0.15 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.20 0.87 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.26 0.48 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.01 9.0560e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.02 0.08 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 1.76 1.96 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 2.99 2.15 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 343.19 341.79 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 72.28 66.01 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.13 0.13 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 2.5300e-003 2.2930e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 3.6970e-003 2.9510e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 2.3290e-003 2.1110e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 3.4000e-003 2.7140e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.41 0.44 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.43 0.34 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.27 0.29 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.03 0.04 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.20 0.88 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.21 0.38 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 3.4550e-003 3.3820e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 7.7500e-004 6.5300e-004 tblVehideEF LDT1 0.41 0.44 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.43 0.34 ----------------------------Y---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDT1 0.27 0.29 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.05 0.06 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.20 0.88 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.23 0.42 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.01 7.7080e-003 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.02 0.09 i tblVehideEF LDT1 1.37 1.51 i tblVehideEF LDT1 3.46 2.48 i tblVehideEF LDT1 307.88 309.49 i tblVehideEF LDT1 i 72.28 66.77 tblVehideEF LDT1 0.14 0.14 i tblVehideEF LDT1 2.5300e-003 2.2930e-003 i tblVehideEF LDT1 3.6970e-003 2.9510e-003 i tblVehideEF LDT1 2.3290e-003 2.1110e-003 i tblVehideEF LDT1 3.4000e-003 2.7140e-003 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.18 0.19 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.39 0.30 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.12 0.13 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.03 0.03 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.23 1.01 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.25 0.45 i tblVehideEF LDT1 3.0960e-003 3.0630e-003 i tblVehideEF LDT1 7.8400e-004 6.6100e-004 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.18 0.19 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.39 0.30 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.12 0.13 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 0.05 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.23 1.01 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.27 0.50 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 5.6080e-003 4.2470e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 7.2840e-003 0.07 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.76 0.98 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.53 2.73 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 355.02 338.79 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 81.24 71.51 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.08 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.6030e-003 1.4980e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 2.3320e-003 1.9580e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.4740e-003 1.3790e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 2.1450e-003 1.8010e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.11 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.12 0.14 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.44 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.33 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 3.5560e-003 3.3520e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 8.3800e-004 7.0800e-004 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.11 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.12 0.14 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF LDT2 0.06 0.44 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.11 0.37 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDT2 i 6.3630e-003 4.8280e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 6.3270e-003 0.06 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.93 1.20 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.35 2.42 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 386.34 362.86 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 81.24 70.86 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.08 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.6030e-003 1.4980e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 2.3320e-003 1.9580e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.4740e-003 1.3790e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 2.1450e-003 1.8010e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.22 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.17 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.17 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.44 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.09 0.29 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 3.8710e-003 3.5900e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 8.3500e-004 7.0100e-004 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.22 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.17 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.17 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.44 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.09 0.32 tblVehideEF LDT2 5.3900e-003 4.0760e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LDT2 7.4940e-003 0.07 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.71 0.91 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.57 2.80 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 345.65 331.49 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 81.24 71.65 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.08 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.6030e-003 1.4980e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 2.3320e-003 1.9580e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.4740e-003 1.3790e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 2.1450e-003 1.8010e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.13 0.15 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.05 0.07 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.51 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.34 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 3.4620e-003 3.2800e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 8.3900e-004 7.0900e-004 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.13 0.15 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.05 0.07 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.51 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.11 0.38 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 5.4460e-003 4.8820e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 5.3310e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 0.02 0.02 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.15 0.17 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.96 0.72 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.41 0.96 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.26 9.44 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 607.95 639.95 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 30.36 10.54 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.09 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.21 1.60 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.7200e-004 9.7000e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 8.7100e-004 2.3300e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-004 9.2800e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.5390e-003 2.5010e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 8.0100e-004 2.1400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.8710e-003 3.1780e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 1.9010e-003 1.5570e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.08 0.06 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.31 0.50 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.26 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-005 9.1000e-005 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 5.9620e-003 6.2250e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.4900e-004 1.0400e-004 ---------------------------- ------------------------ :------------------------------ tblVehideEF LHD1 3.8710e-003 3.1780e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 0.08 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 1.9010e-003 1.5570e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.07 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.31 0.50 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.28 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 5.4460e-003 4.8940e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 5.4200e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.15 0.17 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.97 0.73 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.29 0.92 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.26 9.44 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 607.95 639.97 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 30.36 10.46 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.09 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.08 1.51 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.7200e-004 9.7000e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 8.7100e-004 2.3300e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-004 9.2800e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.5390e-003 2.5010e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 8.0100e-004 2.1400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 7.2450e-003 5.9530e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 0.12 0.09 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.6380e-003 2.9980e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.08 0.06 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.32 0.50 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.25 0.07 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-005 9.1000e-005 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 5.9620e-003 6.2250e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.4700e-004 1.0300e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 7.2450e-003 5.9530e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.12 0.09 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.6380e-003 2.9980e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.32 0.50 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.27 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 5.4460e-003 4.8810e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 5.3180e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.15 0.17 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.96 0.72 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.41 0.96 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.26 9.44 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 607.95 639.95 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 30.36 10.54 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.09 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.18 1.59 tblVehideE F LHD1 9.7200e-004 9.7000e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 8.7100e-004 2.3300e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-004 9.2800e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.5390e-003 2.5010e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 8.0100e-004 2.1400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.4570e-003 2.8250e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.11 0.09 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 1.7350e-003 1.4150e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.08 0.06 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.33 0.53 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.26 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-005 9.1000e-005 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 5.9620e-003 6.2250e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.4900e-004 1.0400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.4570e-003 2.8250e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.11 0.09 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 1.7350e-003 1.4150e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.07 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.33 0.53 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.28 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.6660e-003 3.1720e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 4.5290e-003 3.8570e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 8.3110e-003 9.0280e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.12 0.13 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.50 0.53 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.15 0.56 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 14.48 14.86 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 604.20 638.83 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 23.56 7.29 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.12 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.71 1.77 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.3360e-003 1.4390e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.8700e-004 1.1400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.2780e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.6970e-003 2.7110e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.5600e-004 1.0500e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.4980e-003 1.6870e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.04 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 7.7800e-004 8.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.06 0.06 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.11 0.04 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.4100e-004 1.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 5.8740e-003 6.1550e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.5700e-004 7.2000e-005 ---------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------ tblVehideEF LHD2 1.4980e-003 1.6870e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.04 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 7.7800e-004 8.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.07 0.07 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.05 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.6660e-003 3.1790e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 4.5800e-003 3.8860e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 8.0210e-003 8.7250e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.13 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.51 0.53 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.10 0.53 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 14.48 14.86 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 604.20 638.83 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 23.56 7.25 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.12 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.62 1.67 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.3360e-003 1.4390e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.8700e-004 1.1400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.2780e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.6970e-003 2.7110e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.5600e-004 1.0500e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.8320e-003 3.1830e-003 ---------------------------- ------------------------- ---------------- ---------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD2 0.04 0.05 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.02 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.4720e-003 1.6130e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.06 0.06 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.11 0.04 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.4100e-004 1.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 5.8740e-003 6.1560e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.5600e-004 7.2000e-005 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.8320e-003 3.1830e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.4720e-003 1.6130e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.07 0.07 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.05 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.6660e-003 3.1700e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 4.5170e-003 3.8490e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 8.3600e-003 9.0930e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.13 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.50 0.53 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.16 0.56 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 14.48 14.86 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 604.20 638.83 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 23.56 7.30 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.12 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.70 1.75 tblVehideEF LHD2 1.3360e-003 1.4390e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.8700e-004 1.1400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.2780e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.6970e-003 2.7110e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.5600e-004 1.0500e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.1910e-003 1.3290e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 6.6000e-004 7.0100e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.06 0.06 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.27 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.11 0.04 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.4100e-004 1.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 5.8740e-003 6.1550e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.5700e-004 7.2000e-005 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.1910e-003 1.3290e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 6.6000e-004 7.0100e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.07 0.07 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.27 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.05 tblVehideEF MY i 0.42 0.32 tblVehideEF MY i 0.15 0.24 tblVehideEF MY 19.52 19.61 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MY 9.67 8.55 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MY i 165.74 208.30 tblVehideEF MY i 46.23 60.73 tblVehideEF MY i 1.13 1.13 tblVehideEF MY i 1.7750e-003 1.7570e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 3.4010e-003 2.8660e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 1.6600e-003 1.6440e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 3.2060e-003 2.7000e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 1.69 1.66 tblVehideEF MY i 0.85 0.84 tblVehideEF MY i 0.92 0.90 tblVehideEF MY i 2.15 2.16 tblVehideEF MY i 0.57 1.87 tblVehideEF MY i 2.08 1.83 tblVehideEF MY i 2.0380e-003 2.0610e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 6.8100e-004 6.0100e-004 tblVehideEF MY i 1.69 1.66 tblVehideEF MY i 0.85 0.84 tblVehideEF MY i 0.92 0.90 tblVehideEF MY i 2.65 2.65 tblVehideEF MY i 0.57 1.87 tblVehideEF MY i 2.26 1.99 tblVehideEF MY i 0.42 0.32 tblVehideEF MY i 0.14 0.22 tblVehideEF MY i 20.23 20.27 tblVehideEF MY i 9.11 8.00 tblVehideEF MY 165.74 209.26 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MY 46.23 59.19 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MY i 0.98 0.98 tblVehideEF MY i 1.7750e-003 1.7570e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 3.4010e-003 2.8660e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 1.6600e-003 1.6440e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 3.2060e-003 2.7000e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 3.35 3.28 tblVehideEF MY i 1.24 1.23 tblVehideEF MY i 2.10 2.05 tblVehideEF MY i 2.13 2.13 tblVehideEF MY i 0.57 1.86 tblVehideEF MY i 1.86 1.63 tblVehideEF MY i 2.0490e-003 2.0710e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 6.6500e-004 5.8600e-004 tblVehideEF MY i 3.35 3.28 tblVehideEF MY i 1.24 1.23 tblVehideEF MY i 2.10 2.05 tblVehideEF MY i 2.62 2.63 tblVehideEF MY i 0.57 1.86 tblVehideEF MY i 2.02 1.77 tblVehideEF MY i 0.42 0.32 tblVehideEF MY i 0.15 0.24 tblVehideEF MY i 19.04 19.14 tblVehideEF MY i 9.62 8.49 tblVehideEF MY i 165.74 207.52 tblVehideEF MY i 46.23 60.64 tblVehideEF MY 1.12 1.12 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MY 1.7750e-003 1.7570e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MY i 3.4010e-003 2.8660e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 1.6600e-003 1.6440e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 3.2060e-003 2.7000e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 1.60 1.59 tblVehideEF MY i 1.05 1.04 tblVehideEF MY i 0.74 0.73 tblVehideEF MY i 2.15 2.15 tblVehideEF MY i 0.65 2.12 tblVehideEF MY i 2.08 1.83 tblVehideEF MY i 2.0310e-003 2.0540e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 6.8100e-004 6.00OOe-004 tblVehideEF MY i 1.60 1.59 tblVehideEF MY i 1.05 1.04 tblVehideEF MY i 0.74 0.73 tblVehideEF MY i 2.64 2.65 tblVehideEF MY i 0.65 2.12 tblVehideEF MY i 2.27 1.99 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.01 5.7580e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.02 0.09 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.42 1.20 tblVehideEF MDV i 3.18 3.27 tblVehideEF MDV i 488.89 421.49 tblVehideEF MDV i 110.15 88.73 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.17 0.12 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.7110e-003 1.5730e-003 tblVehideEF MDV 2.4630e-003 2.0550e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MDV 1.5780e-003 1.4510e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MDV i 2.2660e-003 1.8910e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.11 0.13 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.20 0.17 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.09 0.11 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.03 0.03 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.25 0.45 tblVehideEF MDV i 4.9000e-003 4.1680e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.1570e-003 8.7800e-004 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.11 0.13 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.20 0.17 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.09 0.11 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.05 0.04 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.27 0.49 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.01 6.5120e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.02 0.08 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.73 1.46 tblVehideEF MDV i 2.81 2.88 tblVehideEF MDV i 530.71 447.07 tblVehideEF MDV i 110.15 87.92 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.16 0.11 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.7110e-003 1.5730e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 2.4630e-003 2.0550e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.5780e-003 1.4510e-003 tblVehideEF MDV 2.2660e-003 1.8910e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MDV 0.22 0.26 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MDV i 0.23 0.20 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.17 0.21 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.04 0.03 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.21 0.39 tblVehideEF MDV i 5.3230e-003 4.4210e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.1510e-003 8.7000e-004 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.22 0.26 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.23 0.20 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.17 0.21 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.05 0.04 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.23 0.43 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.01 5.5370e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.02 0.09 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.33 1.12 tblVehideEF MDV i 3.24 3.34 tblVehideEF MDV i 476.42 413.84 tblVehideEF MDV i 110.15 88.88 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.16 0.12 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.7110e-003 1.5730e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 2.4630e-003 2.0550e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.5780e-003 1.4510e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 2.2660e-003 1.8910e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.09 0.10 tblVehideEF MDV 0.21 0.18 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MDV 0.08 0.10 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MDV i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.13 0.57 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.25 0.46 tblVehideEF MDV i 4.7750e-003 4.0920e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.1590e-003 8.8000e-004 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.09 0.10 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.21 0.18 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.08 0.10 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.05 0.03 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.13 0.57 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.28 0.50 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 3.3370e-003 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 2.70 0.34 tblVehideEF MH i 5.98 0.00 tblVehideEF MH } 1,002.10 941.76 tblVehideEF MH i 57.67 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.67 4.43 tblVehideEF MH i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehideEF MH i 1.0860e-003 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 3.2460e-003 4.00OOe-003 tblVehideEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehideEF MH i 9.9800e-004 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.56 0.00 tblVehideEF MH 0.08 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MH 0.54 0.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MH i 0.09 0.07 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.35 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 9.9460e-003 8.9030e-003 tblVehideEF MH i 6.8100e-004 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.56 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.08 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.54 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.13 0.08 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.39 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 3.3370e-003 tblVehideEF MH i 0.02 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 2.78 0.34 tblVehideEF MH i 5.56 0.00 tblVehideEF MH } 1,002.10 941.76 tblVehideEF MH i 57.67 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.55 4.18 tblVehideEF MH i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehideEF MH i 1.0860e-003 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 3.2460e-003 4.00OOe-003 tblVehideEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehideEF MH i 9.980Oe-004 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 2.87 0.00 tblVehideEF MH 0.10 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MH 1.06 0.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MH i 0.10 0.07 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.34 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 9.9470e-003 8.9030e-003 tblVehideEF MH i 6.7400e-004 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 2.87 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.10 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.06 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.13 0.08 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.37 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 3.3370e-003 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 2.70 0.34 tblVehideEF MH i 6.02 0.00 tblVehideEF MH } 1,002.10 941.76 tblVehideEF MH i 57.67 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.65 4.38 tblVehideEF MH i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehideEF MH i 1.0860e-003 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 3.2460e-003 4.00OOe-003 tblVehideEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehideEF MH i 9.9800e-004 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.58 0.00 tblVehideEF MH 0.10 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MH 0.53 0.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MH i 0.09 0.07 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.35 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 9.9460e-003 8.9030e-003 tblVehideEF MH i 6.8200e-004 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.58 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.10 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.53 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.13 0.08 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.39 0.00 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 3.1500e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 3.7220e-003 5.9790e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.06 8.4870e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.35 0.34 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.28 0.57 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.06 1.01 tblVehideEF MHD i 151.96 74.93 tblVehideEF MHD } 1,066.63 1,001.03 tblVehideEF MHD i 55.49 8.18 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.65 0.69 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.99 2.37 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.0680e-003 2.4180e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.4490e-003 0.08 tblVehideEF MHD i 7.8800e-004 9.6000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD 1.0220e-003 2.3130e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MHD 6.1670e-003 0.08 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MHD i 7.2400e-004 8.8000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.7450e-003 7.1900e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.05 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 8.5800e-004 3.5500e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.03 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 0.10 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.37 0.05 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.4610e-003 7.1000e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.01 9.5290e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.6100e-004 8.1000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.7450e-003 7.1900e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.05 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.04 0.03 tblVehideEF MHD i 8.5800e-004 3.5500e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.04 0.12 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 0.10 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.40 0.05 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 2.9880e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 3.7740e-003 6.0080e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.05 8.2030e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.26 0.28 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.28 0.57 tblVehideEF MHD i 5.78 0.96 tblVehideEF MHD i 160.96 76.44 tblVehideEF MHD 1,066.63 1,001.04 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MHD 55.49 8.10 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MHD i 0.67 0.70 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.93 2.23 tblVehideEF MHD i 9.00OOe-004 2.0410e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.4490e-003 0.08 tblVehideEF MHD i 7.8800e-004 9.6000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 8.6100e-004 1.9530e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.1670e-003 0.08 tblVehideEF MHD i 7.2400e-004 8.8000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 3.3760e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.06 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.6840e-003 7.0100e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.03 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.36 0.04 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.5460e-003 7.2500e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.01 9.5290e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.5600e-004 8.00OOe-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 3.3760e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.06 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.04 0.03 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.6840e-003 7.0100e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.04 0.12 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.39 0.05 tblVehideEF MHD 0.02 3.3820e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MHD 3.6890e-003 5.9600e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MHD i 0.06 8.5610e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.49 0.43 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.27 0.57 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.14 1.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 139.53 72.84 tblVehideEF MHD } 1,066.63 1,001.03 tblVehideEF MHD i 55.49 8.20 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.62 0.67 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.98 2.35 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.2990e-003 2.9380e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.4490e-003 0.08 tblVehideEF MHD i 7.8800e-004 9.6000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.2430e-003 2.8110e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.1670e-003 0.08 tblVehideEF MHD i 7.2400e-004 8.8000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.3320e-003 5.6300e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.05 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.7900e-004 2.8800e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.03 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.37 0.05 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.3440e-003 6.9100e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.01 9.5290e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.6300e-004 8.1000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD 1.3320e-003 5.6300e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MHD i 0.04 0.03 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.7900e-004 2.8800e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.04 0.12 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.41 0.05 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.01 8.9240e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.0950e-003 8.5070e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.27 0.50 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.54 0.93 tblVehideEF OBUS i 6.17 2.58 tblVehideEF OBUS i 75.04 73.28 tblVehideEF OBUS } 1,098.07 1,407.22 tblVehideEF OBUS i 70.10 20.86 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.35 0.44 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.12 1.70 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.2100e-004 1.7750e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 6.0450e-003 0.04 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.2300e-004 1.9000e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.1600e-004 1.6990e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 5.7680e-003 0.04 tblVehideEF OBUS i 7.5700e-004 1.7400e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 2.1800e-003 2.5990e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF OBUS 9.3000e-004 1.1120e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.09 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.39 0.12 tblVehideEF OBUS i 7.2800e-004 6.9900e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.0900e-004 2.0600e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 2.1800e-003 2.5990e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.07 tblVehideEF OBUS i 9.3000e-004 1.1120e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.11 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.42 0.14 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.01 8.9470e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.2540e-003 8.6370e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.26 0.48 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.55 0.94 tblVehideEF OBUS i 5.76 2.41 tblVehideEF OBUS i 78.48 73.81 tblVehideEF OBUS } 1,098.07 1,407.25 tblVehideEF OBUS i 70.10 20.57 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.36 0.45 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.04 1.59 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.0200e-004 1.5000e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 6.0450e-003 0.04 tblVehideEF OBUS 8.2300e-004 1.9000e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.8000e-005 1.4350e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF OBUS i 5.7680e-003 0.04 tblVehideEF OBUS i 7.5700e-004 1.7400e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 4.0690e-003 4.7330e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.7890e-003 2.1320e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.04 0.09 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.37 0.12 tblVehideEF OBUS i 7.6100e-004 7.0400e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.0200e-004 2.0400e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 4.0690e-003 4.7330e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.07 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.7890e-003 2.1320e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.11 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.40 0.13 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.01 8.9200e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.0660e-003 8.4690e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.28 0.53 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.54 0.92 tblVehideEF OBUS i 6.22 2.60 tblVehideEF OBUS 70.30 72.56 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,098.07 1,407.21 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF OBUS i 70.10 20.90 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.34 0.44 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.11 1.68 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.4700e-004 2.1560e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 6.0450e-003 0.04 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.2300e-004 1.9000e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.4100e-004 2.0620e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 5.7680e-003 0.04 tblVehideEF OBUS i 7.5700e-004 1.7400e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.8870e-003 2.3830e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.5400e-004 1.0620e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.04 0.09 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.27 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.39 0.13 tblVehideEF OBUS i 6.8300e-004 6.9200e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.1000e-004 2.0700e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.8870e-003 2.3830e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.07 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.5400e-004 1.0620e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.11 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.27 tblVehideEF OBUS 0.42 0.14 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.84 0.08 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 6.6110e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.06 6.9670e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 7.83 3.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.64 0.53 tblVehideEF SBUS i 6.66 0.94 tblVehideEF SBUS } 1,146.29 366.87 tblVehideEF SBUS } 1,103.40 1,115.27 tblVehideEF SBUS i 53.92 6.06 tblVehideEF SBUS i 10.00 3.57 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.65 4.82 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 4.0660e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 0.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.5700e-004 4.00OOe-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 3.890Oe-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.6950e-003 2.651Oe-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.200Oe-004 3.600Oe-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.6830e-003 1.3080e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 8.6250e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.94 0.36 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.1770e-003 6.250Oe-004 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.11 0.10 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.37 0.04 tblVehideEF SBUS 0.01 3.5040e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehideEF SBUS i 6.5500e-004 6.00OOe-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.6830e-003 1.3080e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 8.6250e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 1.35 0.52 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.1770e-003 6.2500e-004 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.13 0.11 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.40 0.04 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.84 0.08 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 6.6860e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.05 5.8380e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 7.71 2.99 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.65 0.54 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.83 0.68 tblVehideEF SBUS } 1,198.60 377.09 tblVehideEF SBUS } 1,103.40 1,115.28 tblVehideEF SBUS i 53.92 5.63 tblVehideEF SBUS i 10.32 3.66 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.37 4.53 tblVehideEF SBUS i 9.1190e-003 3.4340e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 0.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.5700e-004 4.00OOe-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 8.7240e-003 3.2850e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.6950e-003 2.6510e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS 0.02 0.03 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.2000e-004 3.6000e-005 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF SBUS i 8.4640e-003 2.3620e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 9.1440e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.93 0.36 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.0830e-003 1.1650e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.11 0.10 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.31 0.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 3.6000e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF SBUS i 6.2400e-004 5.6000e-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 8.4640e-003 2.3620e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 9.1440e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 1.35 0.52 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.0830e-003 1.1650e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.13 0.11 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.34 0.04 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.84 0.08 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 6.6040e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.07 7.2110e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 8.00 3.09 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.63 0.53 tblVehideEF SBUS i 7.02 0.98 tblVehideEF SBUS } 1,074.07 352.76 tblVehideEF SBUS } 1,103.40 1,115.26 ---------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------------------ -------------------------- tblVehideEF SBUS 53.92 6.14 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.56 3.44 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.60 4.78 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 4.9380e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 0.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.5700e-004 4.00OOe-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 4.7240e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.6950e-003 2.6510e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.2000e-004 3.6000e-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.1680e-003 1.1480e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 8.8290e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.94 0.36 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.1000e-003 6.0300e-004 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.11 0.10 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.02 0.06 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.38 0.04 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 3.3710e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF SBUS i 6.6100e-004 6.1000e-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.1680e-003 1.1480e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 8.8290e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 1.35 0.52 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.1000e-003 6.0300e-004 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.13 0.11 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.02 0.06 tblVehideEF SBUS 0.41 0.05 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.51 3.35 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.09 0.02 tblVehideEF UBUS i 8.45 26.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 15.26 1.50 tblVehideEF UBUS } 1,822.40 1,617.71 tblVehideEF UBUS i 153.45 18.08 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.95 0.32 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.50 0.09 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.06 2.9340e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.4200e-003 1.6100e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.21 0.04 tblVehideEF UBUS i 3.00OOe-003 5.4780e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.05 2.7920e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.3060e-003 1.4800e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 9.7430e-003 1.6370e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.11 9.7740e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.7860e-003 7.1300e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.52 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.17 0.07 tblVehideEF UBUS i 9.9960e-003 4.8690e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.8100e-003 1.7900e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 9.7430e-003 1.6370e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.11 9.7740e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.7860e-003 7.1300e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS 2.08 3.43 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 45 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.05 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.28 0.08 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.52 3.35 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.08 0.02 tblVehideEF UBUS i 8.53 26.06 tblVehideEF UBUS i 13.06 1.28 tblVehideEF UBUS } 1,822.40 1,617.72 tblVehideEF UBUS i 153.45 17.70 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.62 0.31 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.50 0.09 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.06 2.9340e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.4200e-003 1.6100e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.21 0.04 tblVehideEF UBUS i 3.00OOe-003 5.4780e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.05 2.7920e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.3060e-003 1.4800e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.02 2.9250e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.14 0.01 tblVehideEF UBUS i 9.6600e-003 1.4550e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.53 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.06 0.07 tblVehideEF UBUS i 9.9970e-003 4.8690e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.7720e-003 1.7500e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.02 2.9250e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS 0.14 0.01 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 46 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF UBUS 9.6600e-003 1.4550e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF UBUS i 2.09 3.43 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.17 0.07 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.51 3.35 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.09 0.02 tblVehideEF UBUS i 8.44 26.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 15.44 1.49 tblVehideEF UBUS } 1,822.40 1,617.71 tblVehideEF UBUS i 153.45 18.06 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.92 0.31 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.50 0.09 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.06 2.9340e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.4200e-003 1.6100e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.21 0.04 tblVehideEF UBUS i 3.00OOe-003 5.4780e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.05 2.7920e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.3060e-003 1.4800e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 8.9770e-003 1.7200e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.13 0.01 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.3820e-003 7.5400e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.52 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.03 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.18 0.07 tblVehideEF UBUS i 9.9960e-003 4.8690e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS 1.8130e-003 1.7900e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 47 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleEF UBUS 8.9770e-003 1.7200e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.13 0.01 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.3820e-003 7.5400e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 2.08 3.43 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.03 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.29 0.08 tblVehideTrips CC_TTP } 28.00 0.00 tblVehideTrips CNW_TTP } 13.00 0.00 tblVehideTrips CW_TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehideTrips CW_TTP } 59.00 100.00 tblVehideTrips DV_TP } 5.00 0.00 tblVehideTrips PB_TP } 3.00 0.00 tblVehideTrips PR_TP } 92.00 100.00 tblVehideTrips ST_TR } 1.49 0.77 tblVehideTrips SU_TR } 0.62 0.77 ---------------------------- ------------------------------:------------------------------ -------------------------- tblVehideTrips WD_TR 3.82 0.77 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 48 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Year lb/day lb/day 2020 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0. 0000 0.0000 0.0 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 11 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year lb/day lb/day 2020 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 49 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 2.0896 i 2.9000e- i 0.0315 i 0.0000 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- i i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 i 1.8000e- 0.0717 i 004 004 i 004 004 004 � i � i 004 � ------ ----- � ------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j--------------- ------I-------j-------j-------I------- Energy •i 0.0875 i 0.7954 i 0.6681 i 4.7700e- 0.0605 i 0.0605 i i 0.0605 0.0605 i 954.4363 954.4363 i 0.0183 0.0175 960.1080 003 -- -i------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ---------------_---- --i-------�-------�-------�-------*------ - Mobile •i 0.5447 i 18.0728 i 3.6916 i 0.0645 2.5006 0.3054 i 2.8060 i 0.7060 i 0.2921 0.9982 i 6,786.584 6,786.584 i 0.0305 1 6,787.346 3 i 3 i i i 8 ---- ---- ��-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j-------j---------------_---- --� ------�-------�-------�-------*---- - Offroad •i 0.1367 i 1.5461 i 0.7740 � 3.1700e- i i 0.0522 i 0.0522 i i 0.0480 0.0480 � i 307.0801 i 307.0801 i 0.0993 309.5630 003 Total 2.8584 20.4145 5.1652 0.0725 2.5006 0.4181 2.9188 0.7060 0.4007 1.1067 8,048.167 1'8,048.167 0.1483 1 0.0175 8,057.089 9 9 5 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 50 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 2.0896 i 2.9000e- 0.0315 i 0.0000 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- i 0.0672 � 0.0672 i 1.8000e- 0.0717 004 004 004 004 004 004 i Energy •i 0.0875 i 0.7954 0.6681 i 4.7700e- 0.0605 i 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 i 954.4363 954.4363 i 0.0183 0.0175 960.1080 003 Mobile •1 0.5447 i 18.0728 3.6916 i 0.0645 2.5006 0.3054 i 2.8060 0.7060 i 0.2921 0.9982 i 6,786.584 6,786.584 i 0.0305 1 6,787.346 3 i 3 i i i 8 Offroad •i 0.1367 i 1.5461 0.7740 i 3.1700e- 0.0522 i 0.0522 0.0480 0.0480 i 307.0801 307.0801 i 0.0993 309.5630 003 Total 2.8584 20.4145 5.1652 0.0725 2.5006 0.4181 2.9188 0.7060 0.4007 1.1067 8,048.167 8,048.167 0.1483 0.0175 8,057.089 9 9 5 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 ;Demolition *Demolition :1/6/2020 1/6/2020 5' 1. Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 51 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter Acres of Paving: 2.7 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating—sgft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; OE 8.001 81, 0.73 ---------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------ -------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators ; 01 8.001 158, 0.38 Demolition -Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00: 247: 0.40 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 0. 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00,LD Mix HDT Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 52 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I i 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 =00000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day I I I I I I I I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;� I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • � 1 1 I I •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I r I 1 1 II 0.0000Vendo 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I • 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Worker •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I 17.1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 53 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I i 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 =00000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day I I I I I I I I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 ;� I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • � 1 1 I I •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I r I 1 1 II 0.0000Vendo 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I • 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I Worker •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I I 17.1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 54 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated �� 0.5447 i 18.0728 i 3.6916 0.0645 i 2.5006 0.3054 2.8060 i 0.7060 0.2921 0.9982 � i 6,786.584 6,786.584 0.0305 i i 6,787.346 i i i i i i i i 3 3 i 8 Unmitigated 0.5447 18.0728 3.6916 0.0645 2.5006 0.3054 2.8060 0.7060 0.2921 0.9982 6,786.584 6,786.584 0.0305 6,787.346 3 3 8 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Manufacturing ; 70.18 ; 70.18 70.18 1,021,789 1,021,789 ....................................................------------T-----------Y------------------------:-------------------------- Other Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 ................................................... ---------- ----------- ---------------------- ------------------------r Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 ......................................------------ -r----------- ---------- ---------------------- ----------------------- Parking Lot ; 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 70.18 70.18 70.18 1,021,789 1,021,789 4.3 Trip Type Information CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 55 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Manufacturing 40.00 8.40 6.90 100.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 ........................------------------__ __ ___ _ -- ---- ------------- Other Non Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 ? 6.90 0.00 I 0.00 T 0.00 0 0 0 .......................r----------------------- -------- --------- -------- ----------------- Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Manufacturing 0.000000i 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.264000; 0.000000; 0.228000; 0.508000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000- 0.000000 i i---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------t---------------i---------------i----------------i----------------i---------------- -------- Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.5421161 0.0375781 0.1852031 0.1185031 0.0162411 0.0051411 0.0173921 0.0686951 0.0013831 0.0011831 0.0045821 0.000945. 0.001038 i i i---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------t---------------i---------------i---------------i----------------i----------------i---------------- -------- OtherNon-AsphaltSurfaces 0.5421161 0.0375781 0.1852031 0.1185031 0.0162411 0.0051411 0.0173921 0.0686951 0.0013831 0.0011831 0.0045821 0.000945, 0.001038 i i i i i Parking Lot 0.542116. 0.037578, 0.185203, 0.118503, 0.016241, 0.005141, 0.017392, 0.068695, 0.001383, 0.001183, 0.004582, 0.000945, 0.001038 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 56 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day I I I I I I I I I I I NaturalGas •I 0.0875 I 0.7954 I 0.6681 1 4.7700e- I 1 0.0605 I 0.0605 I 1 0.0605 0.0605 � I 954.4363 1954.4363 1 0.0183 I 0.0175 i 960.1080 Mitigated 003 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I 1 I NaturalGas 0.0875 0.7954 0.6681 4.7700e- - 0.0605 0.0605 - 0.0605 0.0605 954.4363 • 954.4363 0.0183 0.0175 960.1080 Unmitigated 003 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I Manufacturing � 8112.71 40.0875 I 0.7954 I 0.6681 14.7700e- I I 0.0605 I 0.0605 I I 0.0605 0.0605 954.4363 1954.4363 I 0.0183 I 0.0175 i 960.1080 I 1 1 003 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I ----------- --�qI------- ------- ------- ------- - ------- ------- -------j------- ----- -------II------- ------- I------- -------*I ------ i - Other Asphalt 0 .1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces 'I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 • I 1 I I --�I ---- I I I I I I I I I I I I *------ Other Non- I 0 ■1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 0.0000 • I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 • 1 I I - -I I I I I I I I 1 � I I I I *------- Parking Lot 0 •1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I '1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 • 1 1 I I I Total 0.0875 0.7954 0.6681 4.7700e- 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 954.4363 954.4363 0.0183 0.0175 960.1080 11 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 57 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive I Exhaust JPM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Manufacturing 8.11271 •i 0.0875 i 0.7954 � 0.6681 4.7700e- 0.0605 i 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 i 954.4363 954.4363 i 0.0183 i 0.0175 960.1080 003 Other Asphalt i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Surfaces Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces Parking Lot i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0875 0.7954 0.6681 4.7700e- 0.0605 0.0605 0.0605 077 954.4363 954.4363 0.0183 0.0175 960.1080 11 003 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 58 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 2.0896 i 2.9000e- i 0.0315 i 0.0000 i i 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- i i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 � 0.0672 i 1.8000e- � i 0.0717 •� 004 004 004 004 004 . 004 i ••____-��--------------+__......------}....------....}----._...._.__+......------..}..------......+__._....---------------------}----._......--*-''---- ____•__ -----------------------------}____......_.__----------------____.. Unmitigated 2.0896 2.9000e- 0.0315 0.0000 - 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 - 1.8000e- 0.0717 004 004 004 004 004 004 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 0.2404 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating -----------%------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- --------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------*------- Consumer •i 1.8462 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � i � 0.0000 i � i 0.0000 Products Landscaping •i 2.9400e- i 2.9000e- 0.0315 i 0.0000 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 i 1.8000e- 0.0717 003 004 004 004 004 004 004 i Total 2.0896 2.9000e- 0.0315 0.0000 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 1.8000e- 0.0717 004 004 004 004 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 59 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 0.2404 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •1 1.8462 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping •i 2.9400e- i 2.9000e- � 0.0315 i 0.0000 i � 1.1000e- i 1.1000e- � i 1.1000e- 1.1000e- � i 0.0672 � 0.0672 i 1.8000e- � � 0.0717 003 004 004 004 004 004 004 i Total 2.0896 2.9000e- 0.0315 0.0000 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 0.0672 0.0672 1.8000e- 0.0717 004 004 004 004 004 004 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1• 4.00, 365, 200, 0.37-CNG CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 60 of 60 Date: 3/10/2020 4:57 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations -Trucks) - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter UnMitigated/Mitigated ROG NOx I CO S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Equipment Type lb/day lb/day Tractors/Loaders/•i 0.1367 1.5461 i 0.7740 3.1700e- 0.0522 i 0.0522 0.0480 0.0480 307.0801 307.0801 0.0993 309.5630 Backhoes •� 003 Total 0.1367 1.5461 0.7740 3.1700e- 0.0522 0.0522 0.0480 0.0480 307.0801 307.0801 0.0993 309.5630 003 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual Pennington Industrial (Operations - Trucks) Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Manufacturing 91.14 + 1000sgft ; 2.09 91,140.00 i 0 ----------- -----------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- ;------------- Other Asphalt Surfaces 32.10 + 1000sgft ; 0.74 32,100.00 -+ 0 -------------- --------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- = — — ;------------- ------- Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 19.80 + 1000sgft ; 0.45 19,798.00 -+ 0 -----------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- --------------}------------------ --------------- Parking Lot 164.00 Space T 1.51 65,600.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.4 Precipitation Freq(Days) 28 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2021 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual Project Characteristics - Land Use-Total Project Area is 4.79 acres. Construction Phase- Operations Run Only. Off-road Equipment- Operations Run Only. Trips and VMT- Operations Run Only. Vehicle Trips -Trip Rates are based on information provided in Focused Traffic Evaluation by Urban Crossroads, Inc. Operational Off-Road Equipment- Based on SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Busniess Survey Results (2014) Fleet Mix- Fleet Mix based on information provided in the Trip Generation. Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstruction Phase NumDays 20.00 1.00 ----------------------------_------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix HHD 0.07 0.51 ---------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LDA ? 0.54 0.00 ---------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t------------------------- tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LDT2 0.19 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.26 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix LHD2 5.1410e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix MY 4.5820e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- tblFleetMix MDV 0.12 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ---------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix MH ? 1.0380e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------t-----------------------------t-------------------------- tblFleetMix MHD 0.02 0.23 -----------t---- t-- ---------- ------------ -----------------r 1 0.00 ------003 ---------T----------- ----------- BUS r -----------tblFleetMix ----------�------------ SBUS-------------r 9.4500e-004 ---------T----------- 0.00 ----------- r tblFleetMix UBUS 1.1830e-003 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.48 1.51 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount } 3.00 0.00 tblOffRoad Equipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount } 2.00 0.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperDaysPerYear } 260.00 365.00 tblOperationalOffRoad Equipment OperFuelType } Diesel CNG tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperHorsePower } 97.00 200.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperHoursPerDay } 8.00 4.00 tblOperationalOff Road Eq ui pment OperOffRoadEquipmentNumber } 0.00 1.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 1.43 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.10 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.28 7.55 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.46 0.36 tblVehicleE F HHD i 1.46 2.9270e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD } 6,485.38 1,409.07 tblVehicleEF HHD } 1,461.92 1,350.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 4.62 0.03 tblVehicleEF HHD i 26.41 7.34 tblVehicleEF HHD i 2.69 3.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.06 0.06 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.04 0.04 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehicleEF HHD i 3.8000e-005 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF HHD 8.8680e-003 8.8980e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF HHD i 3.5000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 8.4000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.5800e-003 1.0300e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.85 0.58 tblVehideEF HHD i 4.8000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.07 0.07 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.8000e-004 5.3700e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.06 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 7.1000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 8.4000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.5800e-003 1.0300e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.97 0.66 tblVehideEF HHD i 4.8000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.11 0.09 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.8000e-004 5.3700e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.35 0.03 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.10 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.39 7.39 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.46 0.36 tblVehideE F HHD i 1.39 2.7700e-003 tblVehideEF HHD 6,867.98 1,402.59 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF HHD 1,461.92 1,350.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF HHD i 4.62 0.03 tblVehideEF HHD i 27.25 7.10 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.54 2.88 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.06 0.06 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.04 0.04 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF HHD i 3.8000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 9.7680e-003 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.03 0.03 tblVehideEF HHD i 8.8680e-003 8.8980e-003 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF HHD i 3.5000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.6300e-004 8.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.9560e-003 1.1800e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.80 0.60 tblVehideEF HHD i 9.2000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.07 0.07 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.8400e-004 5.5600e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.04 1.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.06 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 6.9000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.6300e-004 8.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.9560e-003 1.1800e-004 tblVehideEF HHD 0.92 0.69 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF HHD 9.2000e-005 4.00OOe-006 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF HHD i 0.11 0.09 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.8400e-004 5.5600e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.54 0.03 tblVehicleE F HHD i 0.03 3.2330e-003 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.10 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 4.51 7.76 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.45 0.32 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.47 2.9120e-003 tblVehideEF HHD } 5,957.03 1,414.57 tblVehideEF HHD } 1,461.92 1,340.32 tblVehideEF HHD i 4.62 0.03 tblVehideEF HHD i 25.25 7.65 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.67 3.02 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.02 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.06 0.06 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.04 0.04 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF HHD i 3.8000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.02 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.03 0.03 tblVehideEF HHD i 8.8680e-003 8.8710e-003 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF HHD i 3.5000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 6.7000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehicleE F HHD 2.7490e-003 1.2100e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF HHD 0.91 0.54 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF HHD i 4.1000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.07 0.07 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.9200e-004 5.6500e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.06 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF HHD i 7.1000e-005 0.00 tblVehideEF HHD i 6.7000e-005 4.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 2.7490e-003 1.2100e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.05 0.62 tblVehideEF HHD i 4.1000e-005 2.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.11 0.08 tblVehideEF HHD i 1.9200e-004 5.6500e-004 tblVehideEF HHD i 0.05 1.00OOe-006 tblVehideEF LDA i 4.0430e-003 2.4680e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 5.4670e-003 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.58 0.66 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.16 2.12 tblVehideEF LDA i 255.91 265.87 tblVehideEF LDA i 58.81 54.73 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.05 0.04 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.6140e-003 1.4470e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.2650e-003 1.9190e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.4880e-003 1.3330e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.0830e-003 1.7640e-003 tblVehideEF LDA 0.05 0.07 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LDA 0.10 0.10 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.01 9.5180e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.07 0.23 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.5630e-003 2.6300e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 6.0800e-004 5.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.05 0.07 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.10 0.10 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.08 0.25 tblVehideEF LDA i 4.5900e-003 2.8100e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 4.7470e-003 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.71 0.81 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.02 1.87 tblVehideEF LDA i 278.73 289.14 tblVehideEF LDA i 58.81 54.24 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.05 0.04 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.6140e-003 1.4470e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.2650e-003 1.9190e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.4880e-003 1.3330e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.0830e-003 1.7640e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.10 0.14 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.12 0.12 tblVehideEF LDA 0.07 0.10 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.06 0.20 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.7930e-003 2.8600e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 6.0500e-004 5.3700e-004 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.10 0.14 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.12 0.12 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.07 0.10 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.21 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.07 0.22 tblVehideEF LDA i 3.8980e-003 2.3810e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 5.6140e-003 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.54 0.62 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.19 2.17 tblVehideEF LDA i 249.57 259.47 tblVehideEF LDA i 58.81 54.82 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.05 0.04 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.6140e-003 1.4470e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.2650e-003 1.9190e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 1.4880e-003 1.3330e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 2.0830e-003 1.7640e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.06 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.11 0.11 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.03 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 9.8140e-003 9.1880e-003 tblVehideEF LDA 0.04 0.24 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LDA 0.08 0.23 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDA i 2.4990e-003 2.5670e-003 tblVehideEF LDA i 6.0800e-004 5.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.06 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.11 0.11 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.03 0.05 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.04 0.24 tblVehideEF LDA i 0.08 0.26 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.01 8.0140e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.02 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 1.46 1.62 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 3.40 2.43 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 315.98 317.00 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 72.28 66.64 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.14 0.14 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 2.5300e-003 2.2930e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 3.6970e-003 2.9510e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 2.3290e-003 2.1110e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 3.4000e-003 2.7140e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.21 0.23 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.35 0.27 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.14 0.15 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.03 0.04 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.20 0.87 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.24 0.44 tblVehideEF LDT1 3.1780e-003 3.1370e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LDT1 7.8300e-004 6.5900e-004 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.21 0.23 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.35 0.27 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.14 0.15 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.20 0.87 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.26 0.48 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.01 9.0560e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.02 0.08 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 1.76 1.96 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 2.99 2.15 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 343.19 341.79 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 72.28 66.01 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.13 0.13 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 2.5300e-003 2.2930e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 3.6970e-003 2.9510e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 2.3290e-003 2.1110e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 3.4000e-003 2.7140e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.41 0.44 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.43 0.34 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.27 0.29 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.03 0.04 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.20 0.88 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.21 0.38 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 3.4550e-003 3.3820e-003 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 7.7500e-004 6.5300e-004 tblVehideEF LDT1 0.41 0.44 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.43 0.34 ----------------------------Y---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDT1 0.27 0.29 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.05 0.06 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.20 0.88 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.23 0.42 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.01 7.7080e-003 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.02 0.09 i tblVehideEF LDT1 1.37 1.51 i tblVehideEF LDT1 3.46 2.48 i tblVehideEF LDT1 307.88 309.49 i tblVehideEF LDT1 i 72.28 66.77 tblVehideEF LDT1 0.14 0.14 i tblVehideEF LDT1 2.5300e-003 2.2930e-003 i tblVehideEF LDT1 3.6970e-003 2.9510e-003 i tblVehideEF LDT1 2.3290e-003 2.1110e-003 i tblVehideEF LDT1 3.4000e-003 2.7140e-003 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.18 0.19 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.39 0.30 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.12 0.13 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.03 0.03 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.23 1.01 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.25 0.45 i tblVehideEF LDT1 3.0960e-003 3.0630e-003 i tblVehideEF LDT1 7.8400e-004 6.6100e-004 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.18 0.19 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.39 0.30 i tblVehideEF LDT1 0.12 0.13 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 0.05 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.23 1.01 tblVehideEF LDT1 i 0.27 0.50 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 5.6080e-003 4.2470e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 7.2840e-003 0.07 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.76 0.98 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.53 2.73 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 355.02 338.79 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 81.24 71.51 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.08 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.6030e-003 1.4980e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 2.3320e-003 1.9580e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.4740e-003 1.3790e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 2.1450e-003 1.8010e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.11 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.12 0.14 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.44 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.33 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 3.5560e-003 3.3520e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 8.3800e-004 7.0800e-004 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.11 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.12 0.14 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF LDT2 0.06 0.44 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.11 0.37 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDT2 i 6.3630e-003 4.8280e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 6.3270e-003 0.06 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.93 1.20 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.35 2.42 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 386.34 362.86 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 81.24 70.86 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.08 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.6030e-003 1.4980e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 2.3320e-003 1.9580e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.4740e-003 1.3790e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 2.1450e-003 1.8010e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.22 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.17 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.17 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.44 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.09 0.29 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 3.8710e-003 3.5900e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 8.3500e-004 7.0100e-004 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.22 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.14 0.17 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.17 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.44 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.09 0.32 tblVehideEF LDT2 5.3900e-003 4.0760e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LDT2 7.4940e-003 0.07 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.71 0.91 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.57 2.80 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 345.65 331.49 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 81.24 71.65 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.08 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.6030e-003 1.4980e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 2.3320e-003 1.9580e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 1.4740e-003 1.3790e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 2.1450e-003 1.8010e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.13 0.15 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.05 0.07 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.51 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.10 0.34 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 3.4620e-003 3.2800e-003 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 8.3900e-004 7.0900e-004 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.06 0.09 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.13 0.15 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.05 0.07 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.07 0.51 tblVehideEF LDT2 i 0.11 0.38 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 5.4460e-003 4.8820e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 5.3310e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 0.02 0.02 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.15 0.17 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.96 0.72 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.41 0.96 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.26 9.44 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 607.95 639.95 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 30.36 10.54 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.09 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.21 1.60 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.7200e-004 9.7000e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 8.7100e-004 2.3300e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-004 9.2800e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.5390e-003 2.5010e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 8.0100e-004 2.1400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.8710e-003 3.1780e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 1.9010e-003 1.5570e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.08 0.06 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.31 0.50 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.26 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-005 9.1000e-005 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 5.9620e-003 6.2250e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.4900e-004 1.0400e-004 ---------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------ tblVehideEF LHD1 3.8710e-003 3.1780e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 0.08 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 1.9010e-003 1.5570e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.07 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.31 0.50 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.28 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 5.4460e-003 4.8940e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 5.4200e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.15 0.17 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.97 0.73 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.29 0.92 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.26 9.44 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 607.95 639.97 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 30.36 10.46 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.09 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.08 1.51 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.7200e-004 9.7000e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 8.7100e-004 2.3300e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-004 9.2800e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.5390e-003 2.5010e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 8.0100e-004 2.1400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 7.2450e-003 5.9530e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 0.12 0.09 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.6380e-003 2.9980e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.08 0.06 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.32 0.50 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.25 0.07 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-005 9.1000e-005 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 5.9620e-003 6.2250e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.4700e-004 1.0300e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 7.2450e-003 5.9530e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.12 0.09 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.6380e-003 2.9980e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.32 0.50 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.27 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 5.4460e-003 4.8810e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 5.3180e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.15 0.17 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.96 0.72 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.41 0.96 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.26 9.44 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 607.95 639.95 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 30.36 10.54 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.09 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.18 1.59 tblVehideE F LHD1 9.7200e-004 9.7000e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 8.7100e-004 2.3300e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-004 9.2800e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 2.5390e-003 2.5010e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 8.0100e-004 2.1400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.4570e-003 2.8250e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.11 0.09 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 1.7350e-003 1.4150e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.08 0.06 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.33 0.53 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.26 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 9.3000e-005 9.1000e-005 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 5.9620e-003 6.2250e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.4900e-004 1.0400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 3.4570e-003 2.8250e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.11 0.09 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 1.7350e-003 1.4150e-003 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.10 0.07 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.33 0.53 tblVehideEF LHD1 i 0.28 0.08 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.6660e-003 3.1720e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 4.5290e-003 3.8570e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 8.3110e-003 9.0280e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.12 0.13 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.50 0.53 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.15 0.56 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 14.48 14.86 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 604.20 638.83 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 23.56 7.29 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.12 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.71 1.77 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.3360e-003 1.4390e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.8700e-004 1.1400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.2780e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.6970e-003 2.7110e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.5600e-004 1.0500e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.4980e-003 1.6870e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.04 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 7.7800e-004 8.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.06 0.06 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.11 0.04 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.4100e-004 1.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 5.8740e-003 6.1550e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.5700e-004 7.2000e-005 ---------------------------- ------------------------ :------------------------------ tblVehideEF LHD2 1.4980e-003 1.6870e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.04 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 7.7800e-004 8.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.07 0.07 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.05 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.6660e-003 3.1790e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 4.5800e-003 3.8860e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 8.0210e-003 8.7250e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.13 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.51 0.53 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.10 0.53 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 14.48 14.86 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 604.20 638.83 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 23.56 7.25 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.12 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.62 1.67 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.3360e-003 1.4390e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.8700e-004 1.1400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.2780e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.6970e-003 2.7110e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.5600e-004 1.0500e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.8320e-003 3.1830e-003 ---------------------------- ------------------------- ---------------- ---------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD2 0.04 0.05 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.02 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.4720e-003 1.6130e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.06 0.06 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.11 0.04 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.4100e-004 1.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 5.8740e-003 6.1560e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.5600e-004 7.2000e-005 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.8320e-003 3.1830e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.4720e-003 1.6130e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.07 0.07 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.25 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.05 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.6660e-003 3.1700e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 4.5170e-003 3.8490e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 8.3600e-003 9.0930e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.13 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.50 0.53 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.16 0.56 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 14.48 14.86 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 604.20 638.83 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 23.56 7.30 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.12 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.70 1.75 tblVehideEF LHD2 1.3360e-003 1.4390e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.8700e-004 1.1400e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.2780e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.6970e-003 2.7110e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 3.5600e-004 1.0500e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.1910e-003 1.3290e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 6.6000e-004 7.0100e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.06 0.06 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.27 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.11 0.04 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.4100e-004 1.4200e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 5.8740e-003 6.1550e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 2.5700e-004 7.2000e-005 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 1.1910e-003 1.3290e-003 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 6.6000e-004 7.0100e-004 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.07 0.07 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.09 0.27 tblVehideEF LHD2 i 0.12 0.05 tblVehideEF MY i 0.42 0.32 tblVehideEF MY i 0.15 0.24 tblVehideEF MY 19.52 19.61 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MY 9.67 8.55 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MY i 165.74 208.30 tblVehideEF MY i 46.23 60.73 tblVehideEF MY i 1.13 1.13 tblVehideEF MY i 1.7750e-003 1.7570e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 3.4010e-003 2.8660e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 1.6600e-003 1.6440e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 3.2060e-003 2.7000e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 1.69 1.66 tblVehideEF MY i 0.85 0.84 tblVehideEF MY i 0.92 0.90 tblVehideEF MY i 2.15 2.16 tblVehideEF MY i 0.57 1.87 tblVehideEF MY i 2.08 1.83 tblVehideEF MY i 2.0380e-003 2.0610e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 6.8100e-004 6.0100e-004 tblVehideEF MY i 1.69 1.66 tblVehideEF MY i 0.85 0.84 tblVehideEF MY i 0.92 0.90 tblVehideEF MY i 2.65 2.65 tblVehideEF MY i 0.57 1.87 tblVehideEF MY i 2.26 1.99 tblVehideEF MY i 0.42 0.32 tblVehideEF MY i 0.14 0.22 tblVehideEF MY i 20.23 20.27 tblVehideEF MY i 9.11 8.00 tblVehideEF MY 165.74 209.26 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MY 46.23 59.19 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MY i 0.98 0.98 tblVehideEF MY i 1.7750e-003 1.7570e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 3.4010e-003 2.8660e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 1.6600e-003 1.6440e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 3.2060e-003 2.7000e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 3.35 3.28 tblVehideEF MY i 1.24 1.23 tblVehideEF MY i 2.10 2.05 tblVehideEF MY i 2.13 2.13 tblVehideEF MY i 0.57 1.86 tblVehideEF MY i 1.86 1.63 tblVehideEF MY i 2.0490e-003 2.0710e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 6.6500e-004 5.8600e-004 tblVehideEF MY i 3.35 3.28 tblVehideEF MY i 1.24 1.23 tblVehideEF MY i 2.10 2.05 tblVehideEF MY i 2.62 2.63 tblVehideEF MY i 0.57 1.86 tblVehideEF MY i 2.02 1.77 tblVehideEF MY i 0.42 0.32 tblVehideEF MY i 0.15 0.24 tblVehideEF MY i 19.04 19.14 tblVehideEF MY i 9.62 8.49 tblVehideEF MY i 165.74 207.52 tblVehideEF MY i 46.23 60.64 tblVehideEF MY 1.12 1.12 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MY 1.7750e-003 1.7570e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MY i 3.4010e-003 2.8660e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 1.6600e-003 1.6440e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 3.2060e-003 2.7000e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 1.60 1.59 tblVehideEF MY i 1.05 1.04 tblVehideEF MY i 0.74 0.73 tblVehideEF MY i 2.15 2.15 tblVehideEF MY i 0.65 2.12 tblVehideEF MY i 2.08 1.83 tblVehideEF MY i 2.0310e-003 2.0540e-003 tblVehideEF MY i 6.8100e-004 6.00OOe-004 tblVehideEF MY i 1.60 1.59 tblVehideEF MY i 1.05 1.04 tblVehideEF MY i 0.74 0.73 tblVehideEF MY i 2.64 2.65 tblVehideEF MY i 0.65 2.12 tblVehideEF MY i 2.27 1.99 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.01 5.7580e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.02 0.09 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.42 1.20 tblVehideEF MDV i 3.18 3.27 tblVehideEF MDV i 488.89 421.49 tblVehideEF MDV i 110.15 88.73 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.17 0.12 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.7110e-003 1.5730e-003 tblVehideEF MDV 2.4630e-003 2.0550e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MDV 1.5780e-003 1.4510e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MDV i 2.2660e-003 1.8910e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.11 0.13 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.20 0.17 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.09 0.11 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.03 0.03 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.25 0.45 tblVehideEF MDV i 4.9000e-003 4.1680e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.1570e-003 8.7800e-004 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.11 0.13 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.20 0.17 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.09 0.11 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.05 0.04 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.27 0.49 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.01 6.5120e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.02 0.08 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.73 1.46 tblVehideEF MDV i 2.81 2.88 tblVehideEF MDV i 530.71 447.07 tblVehideEF MDV i 110.15 87.92 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.16 0.11 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.7110e-003 1.5730e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 2.4630e-003 2.0550e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.5780e-003 1.4510e-003 tblVehideEF MDV 2.2660e-003 1.8910e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MDV 0.22 0.26 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MDV i 0.23 0.20 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.17 0.21 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.04 0.03 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.21 0.39 tblVehideEF MDV i 5.3230e-003 4.4210e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.1510e-003 8.7000e-004 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.22 0.26 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.23 0.20 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.17 0.21 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.05 0.04 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.11 0.50 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.23 0.43 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.01 5.5370e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.02 0.09 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.33 1.12 tblVehideEF MDV i 3.24 3.34 tblVehideEF MDV i 476.42 413.84 tblVehideEF MDV i 110.15 88.88 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.16 0.12 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.7110e-003 1.5730e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 2.4630e-003 2.0550e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.5780e-003 1.4510e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 2.2660e-003 1.8910e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.09 0.10 tblVehideEF MDV 0.21 0.18 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MDV 0.08 0.10 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MDV i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.13 0.57 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.25 0.46 tblVehideEF MDV i 4.7750e-003 4.0920e-003 tblVehideEF MDV i 1.1590e-003 8.8000e-004 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.09 0.10 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.21 0.18 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.08 0.10 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.05 0.03 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.13 0.57 tblVehideEF MDV i 0.28 0.50 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 3.3370e-003 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 2.70 0.34 tblVehideEF MH i 5.98 0.00 tblVehideEF MH } 1,002.10 941.76 tblVehideEF MH i 57.67 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.67 4.43 tblVehideEF MH i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehideEF MH i 1.0860e-003 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 3.2460e-003 4.00OOe-003 tblVehideEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehideEF MH i 9.9800e-004 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.56 0.00 tblVehideEF MH 0.08 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MH 0.54 0.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MH i 0.09 0.07 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.35 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 9.9460e-003 8.9030e-003 tblVehideEF MH i 6.8100e-004 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.56 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.08 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.54 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.13 0.08 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.39 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 3.3370e-003 tblVehideEF MH i 0.02 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 2.78 0.34 tblVehideEF MH i 5.56 0.00 tblVehideEF MH } 1,002.10 941.76 tblVehideEF MH i 57.67 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.55 4.18 tblVehideEF MH i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehideEF MH i 1.0860e-003 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 3.2460e-003 4.00OOe-003 tblVehideEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehideEF MH i 9.980Oe-004 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 2.87 0.00 tblVehideEF MH 0.10 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MH 1.06 0.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MH i 0.10 0.07 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.34 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 9.9470e-003 8.9030e-003 tblVehideEF MH i 6.7400e-004 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 2.87 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.10 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.06 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.13 0.08 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.37 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 3.3370e-003 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 2.70 0.34 tblVehideEF MH i 6.02 0.00 tblVehideEF MH } 1,002.10 941.76 tblVehideEF MH i 57.67 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.65 4.38 tblVehideEF MH i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehideEF MH i 1.0860e-003 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 3.2460e-003 4.00OOe-003 tblVehideEF MH i 0.04 0.14 tblVehideEF MH i 9.9800e-004 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.58 0.00 tblVehideEF MH 0.10 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MH 0.53 0.00 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MH i 0.09 0.07 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.35 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 9.9460e-003 8.9030e-003 tblVehideEF MH i 6.8200e-004 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 1.58 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.10 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.53 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.13 0.08 tblVehideEF MH i 0.03 0.00 tblVehideEF MH i 0.39 0.00 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 3.1500e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 3.7220e-003 5.9790e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.06 8.4870e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.35 0.34 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.28 0.57 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.06 1.01 tblVehideEF MHD i 151.96 74.93 tblVehideEF MHD } 1,066.63 1,001.03 tblVehideEF MHD i 55.49 8.18 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.65 0.69 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.99 2.37 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.0680e-003 2.4180e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.4490e-003 0.08 tblVehideEF MHD i 7.8800e-004 9.6000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD 1.0220e-003 2.3130e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MHD 6.1670e-003 0.08 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MHD i 7.2400e-004 8.8000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.7450e-003 7.1900e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.05 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 8.5800e-004 3.5500e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.03 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 0.10 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.37 0.05 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.4610e-003 7.1000e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.01 9.5290e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.6100e-004 8.1000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.7450e-003 7.1900e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.05 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.04 0.03 tblVehideEF MHD i 8.5800e-004 3.5500e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.04 0.12 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 0.10 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.40 0.05 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 2.9880e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 3.7740e-003 6.0080e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.05 8.2030e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.26 0.28 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.28 0.57 tblVehideEF MHD i 5.78 0.96 tblVehideEF MHD i 160.96 76.44 tblVehideEF MHD 1,066.63 1,001.04 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MHD 55.49 8.10 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MHD i 0.67 0.70 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.93 2.23 tblVehideEF MHD i 9.00OOe-004 2.0410e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.4490e-003 0.08 tblVehideEF MHD i 7.8800e-004 9.6000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 8.6100e-004 1.9530e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.1670e-003 0.08 tblVehideEF MHD i 7.2400e-004 8.8000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 3.3760e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.06 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.6840e-003 7.0100e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.03 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.36 0.04 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.5460e-003 7.2500e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.01 9.5290e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.5600e-004 8.00OOe-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 3.3760e-003 1.3770e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.06 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.04 0.03 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.6840e-003 7.0100e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.04 0.12 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.39 0.05 tblVehideEF MHD 0.02 3.3820e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MHD 3.6890e-003 5.9600e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MHD i 0.06 8.5610e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.49 0.43 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.27 0.57 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.14 1.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 139.53 72.84 tblVehideEF MHD } 1,066.63 1,001.03 tblVehideEF MHD i 55.49 8.20 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.62 0.67 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.98 2.35 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.2990e-003 2.9380e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.4490e-003 0.08 tblVehideEF MHD i 7.8800e-004 9.6000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.2430e-003 2.8110e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.1670e-003 0.08 tblVehideEF MHD i 7.2400e-004 8.8000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.3320e-003 5.6300e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.05 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.7900e-004 2.8800e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.03 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.37 0.05 tblVehideEF MHD i 1.3440e-003 6.9100e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.01 9.5290e-003 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.6300e-004 8.1000e-005 tblVehideEF MHD 1.3320e-003 5.6300e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF MHD i 0.04 0.03 tblVehideEF MHD i 6.7900e-004 2.8800e-004 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.04 0.12 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.02 0.11 tblVehideEF MHD i 0.41 0.05 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.01 8.9240e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.0950e-003 8.5070e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.27 0.50 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.54 0.93 tblVehideEF OBUS i 6.17 2.58 tblVehideEF OBUS i 75.04 73.28 tblVehideEF OBUS } 1,098.07 1,407.22 tblVehideEF OBUS i 70.10 20.86 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.35 0.44 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.12 1.70 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.2100e-004 1.7750e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 6.0450e-003 0.04 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.2300e-004 1.9000e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.1600e-004 1.6990e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 5.7680e-003 0.04 tblVehideEF OBUS i 7.5700e-004 1.7400e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 2.1800e-003 2.5990e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF OBUS 9.3000e-004 1.1120e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.09 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.39 0.12 tblVehideEF OBUS i 7.2800e-004 6.9900e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.0900e-004 2.0600e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 2.1800e-003 2.5990e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.02 0.02 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.07 tblVehideEF OBUS i 9.3000e-004 1.1120e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.11 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.42 0.14 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.01 8.9470e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.2540e-003 8.6370e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.26 0.48 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.55 0.94 tblVehideEF OBUS i 5.76 2.41 tblVehideEF OBUS i 78.48 73.81 tblVehideEF OBUS } 1,098.07 1,407.25 tblVehideEF OBUS i 70.10 20.57 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.36 0.45 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.04 1.59 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.0200e-004 1.5000e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 6.0450e-003 0.04 tblVehideEF OBUS 8.2300e-004 1.9000e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.8000e-005 1.4350e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF OBUS i 5.7680e-003 0.04 tblVehideEF OBUS i 7.5700e-004 1.7400e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 4.0690e-003 4.7330e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.7890e-003 2.1320e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.04 0.09 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.37 0.12 tblVehideEF OBUS i 7.6100e-004 7.0400e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.0200e-004 2.0400e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 4.0690e-003 4.7330e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.07 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.7890e-003 2.1320e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.11 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.26 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.40 0.13 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.01 8.9200e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.0660e-003 8.4690e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.03 0.02 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.28 0.53 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.54 0.92 tblVehideEF OBUS i 6.22 2.60 tblVehideEF OBUS 70.30 72.56 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,098.07 1,407.21 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF OBUS i 70.10 20.90 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.34 0.44 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.11 1.68 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.4700e-004 2.1560e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 6.0450e-003 0.04 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.2300e-004 1.9000e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.4100e-004 2.0620e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 5.7680e-003 0.04 tblVehideEF OBUS i 7.5700e-004 1.7400e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.8870e-003 2.3830e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.04 0.05 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.5400e-004 1.0620e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.04 0.09 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.27 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.39 0.13 tblVehideEF OBUS i 6.8300e-004 6.9200e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.1000e-004 2.0700e-004 tblVehideEF OBUS i 1.8870e-003 2.3830e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.07 tblVehideEF OBUS i 8.5400e-004 1.0620e-003 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.11 tblVehideEF OBUS i 0.05 0.27 tblVehideEF OBUS 0.42 0.14 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.84 0.08 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 6.6110e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.06 6.9670e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 7.83 3.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.64 0.53 tblVehideEF SBUS i 6.66 0.94 tblVehideEF SBUS } 1,146.29 366.87 tblVehideEF SBUS } 1,103.40 1,115.27 tblVehideEF SBUS i 53.92 6.06 tblVehideEF SBUS i 10.00 3.57 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.65 4.82 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 4.0660e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 0.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.5700e-004 4.00OOe-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 3.8900e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.6950e-003 2.6510e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.2000e-004 3.6000e-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.6830e-003 1.3080e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 8.6250e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.94 0.36 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.1770e-003 6.2500e-004 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.11 0.10 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.37 0.04 tblVehideEF SBUS 0.01 3.5040e-003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehideEF SBUS i 6.5500e-004 6.00OOe-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.6830e-003 1.3080e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 8.6250e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 1.35 0.52 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.1770e-003 6.2500e-004 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.13 0.11 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.40 0.04 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.84 0.08 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 6.6860e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.05 5.8380e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 7.71 2.99 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.65 0.54 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.83 0.68 tblVehideEF SBUS } 1,198.60 377.09 tblVehideEF SBUS } 1,103.40 1,115.28 tblVehideEF SBUS i 53.92 5.63 tblVehideEF SBUS i 10.32 3.66 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.37 4.53 tblVehideEF SBUS i 9.1190e-003 3.4340e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 0.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.5700e-004 4.00OOe-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 8.7240e-003 3.2850e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.6950e-003 2.6510e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS 0.02 0.03 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.2000e-004 3.6000e-005 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF SBUS i 8.4640e-003 2.3620e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 9.1440e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.93 0.36 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.0830e-003 1.1650e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.11 0.10 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.31 0.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 3.6000e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF SBUS i 6.2400e-004 5.6000e-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 8.4640e-003 2.3620e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 9.1440e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 1.35 0.52 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.0830e-003 1.1650e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.13 0.11 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.05 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.34 0.04 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.84 0.08 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 6.6040e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.07 7.2110e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 8.00 3.09 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.63 0.53 tblVehideEF SBUS i 7.02 0.98 tblVehideEF SBUS } 1,074.07 352.76 tblVehideEF SBUS } 1,103.40 1,115.26 ---------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------------------ -------------------------- tblVehideEF SBUS 53.92 6.14 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.56 3.44 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.60 4.78 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 4.9380e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 0.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.5700e-004 4.00OOe-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 4.7240e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.6950e-003 2.6510e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.02 0.03 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.2000e-004 3.6000e-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.1680e-003 1.1480e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 8.8290e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.94 0.36 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.1000e-003 6.0300e-004 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.11 0.10 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.02 0.06 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.38 0.04 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 3.3710e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.01 0.01 tblVehideEF SBUS i 6.6100e-004 6.1000e-005 tblVehideEF SBUS i 4.1680e-003 1.1480e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.03 8.8290e-003 tblVehideEF SBUS i 1.35 0.52 tblVehideEF SBUS i 2.1000e-003 6.0300e-004 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.13 0.11 tblVehideEF SBUS i 0.02 0.06 tblVehideEF SBUS 0.41 0.05 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.51 3.35 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.09 0.02 tblVehideEF UBUS i 8.45 26.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 15.26 1.50 tblVehideEF UBUS } 1,822.40 1,617.71 tblVehideEF UBUS i 153.45 18.08 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.95 0.32 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.50 0.09 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.06 2.9340e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.4200e-003 1.6100e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.21 0.04 tblVehideEF UBUS i 3.00OOe-003 5.4780e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.05 2.7920e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.3060e-003 1.4800e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 9.7430e-003 1.6370e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.11 9.7740e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.7860e-003 7.1300e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.52 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.17 0.07 tblVehideEF UBUS i 9.9960e-003 4.8690e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.8100e-003 1.7900e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 9.7430e-003 1.6370e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.11 9.7740e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.7860e-003 7.1300e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS 2.08 3.43 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 45 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.05 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.28 0.08 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.52 3.35 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.08 0.02 tblVehideEF UBUS i 8.53 26.06 tblVehideEF UBUS i 13.06 1.28 tblVehideEF UBUS } 1,822.40 1,617.72 tblVehideEF UBUS i 153.45 17.70 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.62 0.31 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.50 0.09 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.06 2.9340e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.4200e-003 1.6100e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.21 0.04 tblVehideEF UBUS i 3.00OOe-003 5.4780e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.05 2.7920e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.3060e-003 1.4800e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.02 2.9250e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.14 0.01 tblVehideEF UBUS i 9.6600e-003 1.4550e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.53 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.06 0.07 tblVehideEF UBUS i 9.9970e-003 4.8690e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.7720e-003 1.7500e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.02 2.9250e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS 0.14 0.01 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 46 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF UBUS 9.6600e-003 1.4550e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- tblVehideEF UBUS i 2.09 3.43 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.02 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.17 0.07 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.51 3.35 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.09 0.02 tblVehideEF UBUS i 8.44 26.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 15.44 1.49 tblVehideEF UBUS } 1,822.40 1,617.71 tblVehideEF UBUS i 153.45 18.06 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.92 0.31 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.50 0.09 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.01 0.02 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.06 2.9340e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.4200e-003 1.6100e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.21 0.04 tblVehideEF UBUS i 3.00OOe-003 5.4780e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.05 2.7920e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.3060e-003 1.4800e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 8.9770e-003 1.7200e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.13 0.01 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.3820e-003 7.5400e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.52 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.03 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.18 0.07 tblVehideEF UBUS i 9.9960e-003 4.8690e-003 tblVehideEF UBUS 1.8130e-003 1.7900e-004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 47 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleEF UBUS 8.9770e-003 1.7200e-003 ----------------------------Y----------------------------- -----------------------------T-------------------------- tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.13 0.01 tblVehideEF UBUS i 4.3820e-003 7.5400e-004 tblVehideEF UBUS i 2.08 3.43 tblVehideEF UBUS i 0.03 0.05 tblVehideEF UBUS i 1.29 0.08 tblVehideTrips CC_TTP } 28.00 0.00 tblVehideTrips CNW_TTP } 13.00 0.00 tblVehideTrips CW_TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehideTrips CW_TTP } 59.00 100.00 tblVehideTrips DV_TP } 5.00 0.00 tblVehideTrips PB_TP } 3.00 0.00 tblVehideTrips PR_TP } 92.00 100.00 tblVehideTrips ST_TR } 1.49 0.77 tblVehideTrips SU_TR } 0.62 0.77 ---------------------------- ------------------------------:------------------------------ -------------------------- tblVehideTrips WD_TR 3.82 0.77 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 48 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Year tons/yr MT/yr 2020 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0. 0000 0.0000 0.0 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 11 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year tons/yr MT/yr 2020 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 49 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG+NOX(tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG+NOX(tons/quarter) Highest 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 0.3812 i 4.000Oe- i 3.9300e- 0.0000 i i 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- i i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- � 0.0000 i 7.6200e- i 7.6200e- i 2.000Oe- i 0.0000 � 8.1300e- '� 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 i 003 ---- ---- •------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------j-------j--------------- ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- Energy •i 0.0160 i 0.1452 i 0.1219 i 8.7000e- 0.0110 i 0.0110 i i 0.0110 0.0110 0.0000 1 460.0806 i 460.0806 i 0.0155 5.4800e- 462.1003 004 003 Mobile •1 0.0998 i 3.3085 i 0.6917 0.0117 i 0.4488 i 0.0555 i 0.5043 i 0.1270 i 0.0531 0.1801 0.0000 1 1,124.144 i 1,124.144 i 0.0125 i 0.0000 1,124.456 8 i 8 i i i 7 Offroad •i 0.0249 i 0.2822 i 0.1413 5.8000e- i i 9.5300e- i 9.5300e- i i 8.7600e- 8.7600e- 0.0000 1 50.8406 1 50.8406 i 0.0164 i 0.0000 T 51.2516 004 003 : 003 003 003 i Waste •i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 22.9400 1 0.0000 22.9400 i 1.3557 0.0000 56.8329 Water •1 i i i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 6.6865 i 87.4400 94.1265 i 0.6904 0.0170 116.4408 Total 0.5219 3.7359 0.9588 0.0132 0.4488 0.0761 0.5249 0.1270 0.0729 0.1999 29.6265 1,722.513 1,752.140 2.0905 0.0224 7811.090 11 6 1 4 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 50 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 0.3812 i 4.000Oe- 3.9300e- i 0.0000 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 7.6200e- � 7.6200e- i 2.000Oe- � 0.0000 � 8.1300e- �� 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 i 003 i i i I i i i i :- i i i Energy •i 0.0160 i 0.1452 0.1219 i 8.7000e- 0.0110 i 0.0110 i 0.0110 0.0110 0.0000 i 460.0806 460.0806 i 0.0155 5.4800e- 462.1003 004 003 Mobile •1 0.0998 i 3.3085 0.6917 i 0.0117 0.4488 0.0555 i 0.5043 0.1270 i 0.0531 0.1801 0.0000 i 1,124.144 1,124.144 i 0.0125 0.0000 1,124.456 8 i 8 i i 7 Offroad •1 0.0249 i 0.2822 0.1413 i 5.8000e- 9.5300e- i 9.5300e- i 8.7600e- 8.7600e- 0.0000 1 50.8406 50.8406 i 0.0164 0.0000 51.2516 004 003 003 003 003 i Waste •1 i � i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 • 22.9400 i 0.0000 22.9400 i 1.3557 0.0000 56.8329 Water •1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 6.6865 i 87.4400 94.1265 i 0.6904 0.0170 116.4408 Total 0.5219 3.7359 0.9588 0.0132 0.4488 0.0761 0.5249 0.1270 0.0729 T-7776265 1,722.513 17,752.1140 2.0905 1 0.0224 1 7811.090 11 6 1 4 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 ;Demolition *Demolition :1/6/2020 1/6/2020 5' 1. CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 51 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 2.7 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating —sgft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; OE 8.001 81: 0.73 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+---------------------------- Demolition +Excavators ; 01 8.001 158, 0.38 --------------------------- -*-----------------}----------- ------------- ----------- Demolition -Rubber Tired Dozers 01 8.00. 247- 0.40 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 0. 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00,LD Mix HDT Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 52 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I 1 1 I 1 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00=00000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 ;� I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • � 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I ........... 1-------J-------J-------J-------J-------J-------J-------J-------J............... ...... ----J-------J-------JI ------- ....... r I Vendo 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I 1 ;� I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I Worker •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 ;� I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • � 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 I 1 17.1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 53 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I Off-Road •1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 '1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I 1 1 I 1 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00=00000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I Hauling •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 ;� I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • � 1 1 I 1 •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I 1 1 I 1 1 Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 I 1 ;� I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I Worker •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • � 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 I 1 7.1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 54 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated �� 0.0998 i 3.3085 i 0.6917 0.0117 i 0.4488 0.0555 0.5043 i 0.1270 0.0531 0.1801 0.0000 i 1,124.144 1,124.144 0.0125 i 0.0000 i 1,124.456 i i i i i i i i 8 i 8 i i i 7 Unmitigated 0.0998 3.3085 0.6917 0.0117 0.4488 0.0555 0.5043 0.1270 0.0531 0.1801 0.0000 1,124.144• 1,124.144 0.0125 0.0000 1,124.456 8 8 7 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Manufacturing ; 70.18 ; 70.18 70.18 1,021,789 1,021,789 ....................................................------------T-----------Y------------------------:-------------------------- Other Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 ................................................... ---------- ----------- ---------------------- ------------------------r Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces ; 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 ......................................------------ -r----------- ---------- ---------------------- ----------------------- Parking Lot ; 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 70.18 70.18 70.18 1,021,789 1,021,789 4.3 Trip Type Information CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 55 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Manufacturing 40.00 8.40 6.90 100.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 l 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 ........................---------- -------__ __ ___ _ -- ---- ------------- Other Non Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 ? 6.90 0.00 I 0.00 T 0.00 0 0 0 ....... ................r---------- ---------T -------- --------- -------- ----------------- ----,r------------------r--------t-- - - Parking Lot : 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Manufacturing 0.000000i 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.264000; 0.000000; 0.228000; 0.508000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000- 0.000000 i i---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------t---------------i---------------i----------------i----------------i---------------- -------- Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.5421161 0.0375781 0.1852031 0.1185031 0.0162411 0.0051411 0.0173921 0.0686951 0.0013831 0.0011831 0.0045821 0.000945. 0.001038 i i i---------------i---------------i---------------i---------------t---------------i---------------i---------------i----------------i----------------i---------------- -------- OtherNon-AsphaltSurfaces 0.5421161 0.0375781 0.1852031 0.1185031 0.0162411 0.0051411 0.0173921 0.0686951 0.0013831 0.0011831 0.0045821 0.000945, 0.001038 i i i i i Parking Lot 0.542116. 0.037578, 0.185203, 0.118503, 0.016241, 0.005141, 0.017392, 0.068695, 0.001383, 0.001183, 0.004582, 0.000945, 0.001038 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 56 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I Electricity •1 I 1 I I 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 302.0630 1 302.0630 1 0.0125 1 2.5800e- i 303.1436 Mitigated 003 1 •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I Electricity •1 I 1 I 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 302.0630 1 302.0630 I 0.0125 1 2.5800e- � 303.1436 Unmitigated 003 1 •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I NaturalGas •1 0.0160 I 0.1452 1 0.1219 18.7000e- 1 I 0.0110 I 0.0110 I I 0.0110 0.0110 0.0000 I 158.0176 1 158.0176 13.0300e- 1 2.9000e- � 158.9567 Mitigated ;i I I 1 004 I 1 1 I 1 , i 1 1 003 I 003 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 I 1 NaturalGas 0.0160 0.1452 0.1219 8.7000e- - 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 0.0000 158.0176 • 158.0176 3.0300e- - 2.9000e- 158.9567 Unmitigated 004 003 003 -- -------- -------- --- 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I Manufacturing � 2.96114e.1 0.0160 I 0.1452 1 0.1219 1 8.7000e- I 1 0.0110 I 0.0110 1 1 0.0110 0.0110 • 0.0000 I 158.0176 1 158.0176 13.0300e- 12.9000e- i 158.9567 1 +006 004 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 003 I 003 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 ---------' �1-------J-------J-------J-------J-------J-------J-------J-------J-------"""" "" I J-------J-------+ --' ------- J------- _ *------- Other Asphalt 0 .1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 Surfaces I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 --�I ---- I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I *------ Other Non- 1 0 ■1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 • 1 I I 1 h 71 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I *------- Parking Lot 1 0 •1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 '1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 • I 1 I I I 1 '1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 • I 1 I I I Total 0.0160 0.1452 0.1219 8.7000e- 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 0.0000 158.0176 158.0176 3.0300e- 2.9000e- 158.9567 004 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 57 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Manufacturing 2.96114e•i 0.0160 i 0.1452 � 0.1219 � 8.7000e- 0.0110 i 0.0110 � � 0.0110 0.0110 0.0000 i 158.0176 158.0176 i 3.0300e- i 2.9000e- 158.9567 i +006 004 003 003 i - ------ ---- - Other Asphalt 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0-.0-000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Surfaces - ---- - ----- - Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000- i -0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces Parking Lot i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0160 0.1452 0.1219 8.7000e- 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 0.0000 158.0176 158.0176 3.0300e- 2.9000e- 158.9567 004 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 58 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Manufacturing 925071 •i 294.7474 i 0.0122 2.52OOe- 295.8019 •� 003 i ----------- •� ----------------�------it------ *------- Other Asphalt 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces ------- ------- Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces i •� -J------- ------- Parking Lot 22960 •i 7.3156 i 3.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 7.3417 004 i 005 Total 302.0630 0.0125 2.5800e- 303.1436 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 59 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Mitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Manufacturing 925071 •i 294.7474 i 0.0122 2.52OOe- 295.8019 003 ----------- ---------------- Other Asphalt 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces ------- ------- Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces i •� -J------- ------- Parking Lot 22960 •i 7.3156 i 3.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 7.3417 004 i 005 Total 302.0630 0.0125 2.5800e- 303.1436 003 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 60 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated •i 0.3812 : 4.000Oe- i 3.9300e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 7.6200e- i 7.6200e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.1300e- Z 005 003 005 005 005 005 . 003 003 005 i 003 Unmitigated 0.3812 4.000Oe- 3.9300e- 0.0000 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.6200e- 7.6200e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.1300e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 0.0439 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Coating •' ' i -----------%------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- --------------- - --- ------- ------- ------- -------*------- Consumer �� 0.3369 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Products Landscaping •i 3.7000e- i 4.000Oe- 3.9300e- i 0.0000 i 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 7.6200e- 7.6200e- i 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.1300e- •� 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 . 003 003 005 i 003 Total 0.3812 4.000Oe- 3.9300e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.6200e- 7.6200e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.1300e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 61 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 0.0439 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 0.3369 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 Products '� i Landscaping •i 3.7000e- i 4.000Oe- 3.9300e- i 0.0000 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 7.6200e- 7.6200e- i 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.1300e- '� 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 i 003 Total 0.3812 4.000Oe- 3.9300e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.6200e- 7.6200e- 2.0007 0.0000 8.1300e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 62 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated •1 94.1265 i 0.6904 0.0170 i 116.4408 ---------- --------------}--------------}---------------------- Unmitigated •• 94.1265 0.6904 0.0170 116.4408 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal MT/yr Manufacturing 21.0761/ •1 94.1265 0.6904 0.0170 116.4408 0 �� - -------r------i�------- T_______ Other Asphalt 0/0 -i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces i i1 i Other Non- 0/0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces -r--------------�---------------T Parking Lot 0/0 •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 94.1265 0.6904 0.0170 116.4408 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 63 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal MT/yr Manufacturing 21.0761/ •1 94.1265 0.6904 0.0170 116.4408 j 0 ------- ------- Other Asphalt 0/0 •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces ------ ------- ------- Other Non- i 0/0 •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces i ------4r------ ------- ------- Parking Lot 0/0 •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 94.1265 0.6904 0.0170 116.4408 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 64 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual Category/Year Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr Mitigated •i 22.9400 i 1.3557 i 0.0000 i 56.8329 -__----__.i--------------+--------------}...............-__..-- Unmitigated •• 22.9400 1.3557 0.0000 56.8329 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr Manufacturing 113.01 •i 22.9400 1.3557 0.0000 56.8329 ---------- ------- ------- Other Asphalt 0 •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces ; ------- ------- ------- Other Non- 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces -r--------------�-------�-------T Parking Lot 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 22.9400 1.3557 0.0000 56.8329 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 65 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Mitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr Manufacturing 113.01 •i 22.9400 1.3557 0.0000 56.8329 J-------j------- Other Asphalt 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces i •� •� ------ ------- ------- Other Non- i 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces i •: --ji ------- ------- Parking Lot 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 22.9400 1.3557 0.0000 56.8329 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1• 4.00, 365, 200, 0.37,CNG CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 66 of 66 Date: 3/10/2020 4:58 PM Pennington Industrial (Operations-Trucks)- Riverside-South Coast County, Annual UnMitigated/Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Equipment Type tons/yr MT/yr Tractors/Loaders/•i 0.0249 0.2822 i 0.1413 � 5.8000e- i i 9.5300e- � 9.5300e- 8.7600e- 8.7600e- 0.0000 i 50.8406 50.8406 i 0.0164 i 0.0000 i 51.2516 Backhoes •� 004 003 003 003 003 Total 0.0249 0.2822 0.1413 5.8000e- 9.5300e- 9.5300e- 8.7600e- 8.7600e- 0.0000 50.8406 50.8406 0.0164 0.0000 51.2516 004 003 003 003 003 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation HIGH-CUBE WAREHOUSE VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS PREPARED FOR SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INDUSTRIAL AND OFFICE PROPERTIES PREPARED BY INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS WASHINGTON, DC OCTOBER 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as a result of work sponsored, paid for, in whole or in part, by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and NAIOP (National Association of Industrial and Office Properties (NAIOP). The report is the product of a collaborative process by which ITE, SCAQMD, and NAIOP embarked upon an effort to better understand vehicle trip generation rates at high-cube warehouse facilities. The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of SCAQMD or NAIOP. SCAQMD, NAIOP, their officers, employees, contractors, and subcontractors make no warranty, expressed or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this report. SCAQMD and NAIOP have not approved or disapproved this report, nor has SCAQMD or NAIOP passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information contained herein. The NAIOP Inland Empire and Southern California Chapters provided direct input for various items of the report, including a suggested high-cube warehouse classification system. High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purpose – South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and NAIOP (National Association of Industrial and Office Properties) provided funding to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) to help in the establishment of national guidance for the estimation of vehicle trip generation at what are commonly called high-cube warehouse distribution centers (HCW). Definition of High-Cube Warehouse – A high-cube warehouse is a building that typically has at least 200,000 gross square feet of floor area, has a ceiling height of 24 feet or more, and is used primarily for the storage and/or consolidation of manufactured goods (and to a lesser extent, raw materials) prior to their distribution to retail locations or other warehouses. A typical HCW has a high level of on-site automation and logistics management. The automation and logistics enable highly-efficient processing of goods through the HCW. For the purpose of this trip generation analysis, HCWs are grouped into five types: fulfillment center, parcel hub, cold storage facility, transload facility, and short-term storage facility. Data Sources – The analysis contained herein is based on data from 15 separate data sources, including recent data collected under the sponsorship of SCAQMD and NAIOP. The database includes trip generation information from 107 individual sites. Findings – The HCW market continues to evolve as individual tenants/owners implement different e- commerce business plans. For example, some deliver goods to the customer within two days and others deliver orders to the nearest store for customer pick-up. As business plans and technology continue to evolve, these should continue to be monitored. Although the tenant or its planned operations are often unknown at the time of site development review, for the purpose of estimating vehicle trip generation, it may be as important to know the tenant as much as other facility factors. For transload, short-term storage, and cold storage HCWs, the proportionate mix of types of vehicles (i.e., cars versus trucks) accessing the site is very consistent, both daily and during the AM and PM peak hours. For a cold storage HCW, the currently available data demonstrates a useable, direct correlation between building size and vehicle trip generation. The single data points for fulfillment centers and parcel hubs indicate that they have significantly different vehicle trip generation characteristics compared to other HCWs. However, there are insufficient data from which to derive useable trip generation rates. For transload and short-term storage HCW sites, additional data sites and additional information on past sites are needed in order to derive useable trip generation rates. Recommendations (Action Plan) – A strategically-developed data collection program is needed that targets each type of HCW individually. The strategy should include a prioritized plan for collecting additional data at five classifications of HCWs that are representative of the types of facilities expected to be commonly developed in coming years. The data should be collected at mature facilities, each of which clearly fits within one HCW classification, during periods of typical levels of activity based on the types of facilities and businesses served. All future data collection should seek to acquire an enhanced set of site descriptive information that will enable development of better predictive models than are currently available. High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 2 STUDY PURPOSE AND PROCESS South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and NAIOP (National Association of Industrial and Office Properties) provided funding to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) to help in the establishment of consensus-based national guidance for the estimation of trip generation at what are commonly called high-cube warehouses (HCW). This report documents the results of that effort to develop a credible and defensible procedure for collecting and analyzing site trip generation data for use in transportation impact analyses (TIA) and air quality/vehicular emissions analyses (AQA 1) for HCW-type facilities. ITE convened a meeting of practitioner-based experts at ITE Headquarters on April 1, 2015. The meeting participants are listed in Table 1. At the meeting’s conclusion, several individuals were tasked with development of specific products, including the following: • An overall work plan for this report and for subsequent data collection and analysis • A clear and consistent definition of HCW for this report and for future studies and analysis • A vehicle classification scheme that satisfies ultimate data requirements for TIA and AQA and complies with reasonable data collection capabilities and budgets ITE staff assumed responsibility for compilation and analysis of existing HCW trip generation data. The full expert panel provided comments and suggestions on each interim product that eventually became part of this complete report. Nevertheless, responsibility for content completeness and data analysis accuracy rests with ITE staff. Table 1. Expert Panel for High-Cube Warehouse Trip Generation Study Mr. Brian Bochner Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, Texas Mr. Paul Basha City of Scottsdale, Arizona Mr. Milton Carrasco Transoft Solutions, Inc., Richmond, British Columbia Dr. Kelly Clifton Portland State University, Portland, Oregon Mr. Henry Hogo (for Mr. Barry Wallerstein) South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, California Mr. Kim Snyder Prologis, Cerritos, California Ms. Cecilia Ho Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC Mr. Ian Macmillan South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, California Mr. Thomas Phelan VHB, Newark, New Jersey Mr. Jeremy Raw Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC Mr. Erik Ruehr VRPA Technologies, San Diego, California Mr. Frank Sherkow Southstar Engineering and Consulting, Inc., Yachats, Oregon Mr. Joe Zietsman Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, Texas Mr. Tom Brahms Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC Mr. Kevin Hooper Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC Ms. Lisa Tierney Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC 1 In California, when a new warehouse project is proposed, it undergoes environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Air quality analyses conducted pursuant to CEQA typically compare project emissions against local air district thresholds to determine the potential significance of the project’s air quality impacts. These emission estimates rely on trip generation rates to determine the volume of cars and trucks that could visit the proposed project site. High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 3 HIGH-CUBE WAREHOUSE DEFINITION A high-cube warehouse (HCW) is a building that typically has at least 200,000 gross square feet of floor area, has a ceiling height of 24 feet or more, and is used primarily for the storage and/or consolidation of manufactured goods (and to a lesser extent, raw materials) prior to their distribution to retail locations or other warehouses. A typical HCW has a high level of on-site automation and logistics management. The automation and logistics enable highly-efficient processing of goods through the HCW.2 A classification scheme for different types of HCWs is presented in Table 2 along with their distinctive characteristics. The characteristics of a typical standard warehouse are provided for comparative purposes. The five types of HCW are the following: • Transload – usually pallet loads or larger handling products of manufacturers, wholesalers/distributors, or retailers with little or no storage durations • Short-Term Storage – products held on-site for a short time • Cold Storage – HCW with permanent cold storage in at least part of the building • Fulfillment Center – storage and direct distribution of e-commerce product to end users • Parcel Hub – transload function for a parcel delivery company 2 High-cube warehouses are classified as Land Use Code 152 in ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. The definition provided in Trip Generation Manual for HCW is as follows: “High-cube warehouses/distribution centers are used for the storage of materials, goods and merchandise prior to their distribution to retail outlets, distribution centers or warehouses. These facilities are typically characterized by ceiling heights of at least 24 feet with small employment counts due to a high level of mechanization. High-cube warehouses/distribution centers generally consist of large steel or masonry shell buildings and may be occupied by or multiple tenants. A small ancillary office use component may be included and some limited assembly and repackaging may occur within these facilities. “High-cube warehouses/distribution centers may be located in industrial parks or be free-standing. Intermodal truck terminal (Land Use 030), industrial park (Land Use 130), manufacturing (Land Use 140) and warehousing (Land Use 150) are related uses.” When the 10th edition of Trip Generation Manual is developed, the findings and recommendations of this report will be reflected in an updated definition for high-cube warehouses. High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 4 Table 2. High-Cube Warehouse Classifications Standard Warehouse/ Storage Transload Facility Short-Term Storage Cold Storage Fulfillment Center Parcel Hub Description and Key Warehouse Functions Typical Functions Products stored on-site typically for more than one month Focus on consolidation and distribution of pallet loads (or larger) of manufacturers, wholesalers, or retailers; little storage duration; high throughput and high-efficiency Focus on warehousing/ distribution with distribution space operated at high efficiency; often with custom/special features built into structure for movement of large volumes of freight Temperature- controlled for frozen food or other perishable products stored in any type of HCW; building built with substantial insulation, including foundation, walls, and roof 3 Storage and direct distribution of e- commerce product to end users; smaller packages and quantities than for other types of HCW; often multiple mezzanine levels for product storage and picking Regional and local freight-forwarder facility for time- sensitive shipments via air freight and ground (e.g., UPS, FedEx, USPS); site often includes truck maintenance, wash, or fueling facilities Break-Bulk or Assembly Can include break-bulk and assembly activities Very limited pick- and-pack area within facility May or may not include break-bulk, repack or assembly activities Limited or no break-bulk, repack or assembly activities Pick-and-pack area comprises majority of space Limited or no break- bulk, repack or assembly activities Place in Supply Chain Usually for final distribution to retail stores but can be for manufacturer to wholesale distribution Typically, late in the supply chain for final distribution to retail stores or local, smaller distribution centers Typically, freight for final consumption (business-to-business and consumers) Can be situated at multiple points in the supply chain (intermediate or final delivery) 3 Cold storage products (e.g., flowers and other perishables) that are not frozen must be shipped within hours or a few days. Cold storage products that are frozen may take a long time to ship. Products in these facilities may be treated more like typical HCW products. High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 5 Standard Warehouse/ Storage Transload Facility Short-Term Storage Cold Storage Fulfillment Center Parcel Hub Location Typically in an industrial area within urban area or urban periphery Typically in an area with convenient freeway access; often in rural or urban periphery area Typically in an area with convenient freeway access Depends on supply and demand markets Often near a parcel hub or USPS facility, due to time sensitivity of freight Typically in close proximity to airport; often stand-alone Overall Site Layout Employee Parking Smaller employee parking ratio (per facility square foot) than fulfillment center or parcel hub Smaller employee parking ratio (per facility square foot) than fulfillment center or parcel hub Larger parking supply ratio than for all other HCW types Larger employee parking ratios; truck drivers often based at facility (i.e., parking may be for both site employees and drivers) Truck & Trailer Parking Limited truck parking area; increases with distance to major distribution hub Large, open trailer parking area surrounding facility; produces high land to building ratio Ratio of truck parking spaces to docks can vary between 0.5:1 and 1.5:1, with 1:1 being very common Can vary with whether products are frozen or perishable 4 Significantly higher truck parking ratios than for other HCWs Very high truck parking ratios to dock positions, often 2:1 or more Loading Dock Location Either on one side or on two adjacent sides Minimum of two sides (adjacent or opposite); can be on four sides On either one or two sides Usually on both long sides of building; can be on four sides Building Dimensions Length vs. Depth Typical length vs. depth ranges between 3:1 and 2:1; shallower than Standard Typical length vs. depth is 2:1; shallower than Standard Typical configuration is cross-dock; building typically more shallow (150-300 feet across) than other HCWs 4 Cold storage product handling must be done quickly. Any product stored in a trailer on the site requires either an idling truck or an external power supply to maintain the temperature within the required ranges. High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 6 Standard Warehouse/ Storage Transload Facility Short-Term Storage Cold Storage Fulfillment Center Parcel Hub Ceiling Height Typically between 28 and 40 feet Typically, lower than for other HCW Typically between 28 and 34 feet, with some facilities in excess of 40 feet Typically higher (70-100 feet) to maximize efficiency of refrigeration; frozen food tends to have a higher ceiling than produce handling Often as high as 40 feet in order to accommodate up to three levels of interior mezzanines Typically not as tall as other HCW; commonly between 18 and 20 feet range; racking not usually provided (i.e. floor-stack only) Number of Docks Low number of dock positions to overall facility, 1:20,000 square feet or lower Typical dock-high loading door ratio is 1:10,000 square feet; common range between 1:5,000 & 1:15,000 square feet Typically, 1:10,000 square feet or lower Automation Material Handling Systems Little or no automation; mechanization limited to pallet jacks and forklifts Very highly- mechanized material handling systems Very highly- mechanized material handling systems; high ratio of material handling equipment to overall floor area Very high clear height requires sophisticated material handling equipment High levels of automation in material handling equipment High levels of automation in material handling equipment Conveying Systems Little or no automation Usually automated mechanized conveying Usually limited automated conveying Very high clear height requires a sophisticated conveyance system High levels of automation in conveying systems High levels of automation in conveying systems Warehouse Mgmt Systems (WMS) Some facilities use ASRS (Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems) High levels of automation; some use of ASRS High levels of automation High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 7 Table 2. Additional Descriptive Features Typical Floor Area Ratios range between 35 and 60 percent. Standard, Fulfillment Center, and Parcel Hub sites tend to have higher values than Transload and Short-Term Storage HCW. Office/Employee Welfare5 Space is highly variable and is insignificant within overall building square footage. Common values are between 3,000 and 5,000 square feet for Cold Storage and between 5,000 and 10,000 square feet for Transload Facility, Fulfillment Center, and Parcel Hub. Movement of Goods in Trucks – For a Transload site, typical truck movements are comprised of full load, large trailers, both inbound and outbound. For some “last mile” or local distribution centers, long-haul trucks or international containers can arrive loaded and depart empty, while local delivery trucks arrive empty and depart loaded. For national and regional distribution centers, trucks can come in loaded and re-load with different product mix and depart loaded. Hours of Operation and Peak Periods – Peak truck movement activity is often outside the peak commuting period on the adjacent street system. HCW operations are often 24 hours per day, every day of the year. For a Standard site, there is a greater likelihood that the site peak period of traffic operations may coincide with or be near the street peak period. Truck Sizes – Truck size can vary significantly between similar sites. Sizes and types are a function of the origins and destinations of the goods processed at the facility (i.e., location in the supply chain). Local deliveries to business/residential customers are commonly made with smaller trucks (except warehouses that, for example, deliver bulky items to a home improvement store). Longer distance travel or deliveries at early stages in the supply chain are typically with larger trailers. For Cold Storage and Fulfillment Center, the outbound trucks are often smaller because of cargo weight and last-mile distribution needs. Intermediate hubs accommodate large trucks on both the inbound and outbound side (e.g., FedEx Ground). "Final delivery" hubs have small trucks on the outbound side (e.g., FedEx Overnight). 5 Employee welfare area includes restrooms, locker rooms, and break rooms. High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 8 VEHICLE CLASSIFICATION FOR WAREHOUSE TRIP GENERATION DATA The preferred vehicle classification scheme should satisfy both the ultimate needs for TIA and AQA analysis and comply with reasonable data collection capabilities and budgets. FHWA maintains a 13- category classification system for motorized vehicles (presented in Figure 1 and maintained at the following website: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/tmguide/tmg_2013/vehicle-types.cfm). Figure 1. FHWA Vehicle Classification Types The vehicle types that enter and exit a HCW site can be separated to correspond to individual “markets:” • Vehicles used for employee and facility service access (i.e., for goods and services consumed on site) • Vehicles used for local delivery access (e.g., wholesale and retail delivery for consumption in the local metropolitan area) • Vehicles used for high-volume transfer (e.g., long-distance freight, relay distribution to other distribution or warehouse facilities) High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 9 A simple and straightforward correlation between “markets” and the 13 FHWA classifications is as follows: 1. Facility Access: includes Classes 2 and 3 (passenger cars and light trucks), and Classes 1 and 4 (motorcycles and buses) if observed 2. Local Goods Movement: includes Classes 5 through 7 (two-, three-, and four-axle single-unit trucks) 3. Long Distance Goods Movement: includes Classes 8 through 13 (multi-unit trucks) A significant limitation to this classification scheme is the growing disconnect between truck size and trip length over time. They do not correlate as well for many carriers as they did in the past. There is a wide range of practices in deliveries and many prominent retail chains currently use trucks in Classes 8 and 9, for example, for local deliveries. In other words, a Class 8-13 vehicle is not necessarily a long-distance truck trip. The primary advantage of mapping these vehicle types to the FHWA classification scheme is that commercially available automated monitoring equipment is generally capable of reporting the FHWA vehicle classes without specialized data interpretation. Encouraging agencies to develop local counts of these facilities will also be more successful if the agencies can use standard automated counters without specialized software, even at the expense of occasional misclassification relative to “ideal” categories for a warehouse trip generation study. Video detection could make more information available, but at greater expense for data processing. It is also important to recognize that counting equipment manufacturers (and often representatives of a public agency) are able to reprogram automated counters to use an alternate classification scheme. For example, if there is a specific axle configuration commonly used for domestic container freight versus international container freight at a particular data collection site, it may be feasible to detect. Such schemes are relatively easy to share among agencies using the same types of equipment. As noted above, the observed physical vehicle type based on a FHWA class may not provide sufficient information on its own to identify the “purpose” of the truck trip. The classification scheme may need to be adjusted to reflect the specific trip-making to and from a subject warehouse site. The following are examples of refinements that could be necessary given the particular characteristics of a warehouse site: 1. Even in a standard traffic monitoring application, the distinction between a passenger car (Class 2) and a light truck (Class 3: pickups, large SUVs, vans) has limited benefit and is difficult to establish decisively. For the warehouse trip generation application, the merging of these classes should improve overall accuracy. 2. Local goods movement may also include Class 3 vehicles (specifically two-axle vans). If separate driveways are used for goods movement and general facility access, the Class 3 vehicles in the goods movement driveway can be considered local goods movement vehicles. 3. It is sometimes difficult for automated equipment to distinguish between a Class 4 vehicle (bus) and a Class 5/6 truck. In the rare circumstance where a bus enters or exits a warehouse site driveway, a manual count or simple reference to a published transit service schedule may be necessary. 4. Class 5 vehicles include “dualie” pickups which may operate as personal vehicles for facility access or as larger panel trucks often used for local goods delivery. The presence of and use of separate driveways for goods movement and general facility access may be the only means to distinguish between the two types of uses. High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 10 DATA NEEDS FOR TIA AND AQA Typical data requirements for TIA and AQA are listed in Table 3. Some measures are used to classify a building type. Some measures can be used as independent variables with a direct relationship to the quantity of vehicle trips generated by a site (by vehicle type). Table 3. Data Needs for HCW Trip Generation Analysis Vehicle Trip Data TIA AQA Vehicle Trips by Vehicle Classification • 2 classifications – car, truck √ • 4 classifications – personal passenger vehicle, parcel delivery, single unit truck, tractor-trailer combination *6 √ Vehicle Trips by Time-of-Day (by vehicle classification) • Directional 15-minute volumes on a weekday (typically Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday) o AM peak hour for generator √ o AM peak hour for adjacent street √ o PM peak hour for generator √ o PM peak hour for adjacent street √ • Non-directional 24-hour volume on a weekday √ Vehicle Trips by Driveway (if employees and freight delivery use separate driveways) √ √ Vehicle Trips within Context of Seasonal Variations • Daily Variations √ √ • Monthly Variations √ • Highest Day of Year √ Independent Variable Data Building Size Building GSF 7 (total, office, retail, manufacturing/enhancements, storage/distribution) √ √ Building Volume (cubic feet) √ √ Building Shape (length-to-depth ratio) √ Number of High-Loading docks √ √ Building Function Cold Storage Provided √ √ NAICS Industrial Code √ √ Employees √ √ Commodity type (retail, manufacturing, other) √ √ Where in Supply Chain (parts, manufacturer/assembly, wholesale/distributor, retailer) √ Site Size Site acres √ √ Floor area ratio (FAR) √ √ Parking spaces (employee/visitor, truck/trailer) √ √ Site Context Area type (urban, suburban, rural) √ √ Distance to port (seaport, intermodal center, regional air cargo) √ √ 6 Some TIA may require truck classification information. 7 GSF is gross square footage of the building. High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 11 ASSEMBLY AND CLASSIFICATION OF CURRENTLY AVAILABLE DATA Data from the following studies were compiled and analyzed for possible use in the trip generation analysis for the High-Cube Warehouse study: • Warehouse Truck Trip Study, Data Results and Usage, South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, CA 2014 • Trip Generation Analysis for High‐Cube Warehouse Distribution Center, prepared for NAIOP by Kunzman Associates, Laguna Hills, CA 2011 • Trip Generation Characteristics of Discount/Home Improvement Superstores, Major Distribution Centers, and Small Box Stores, prepared for Florida Department of Transportation by Wilbur Smith Associates 2011 • Western Riverside County Warehouse/Distribution Center Trip Generation Study, prepared for NAIOP by Crain & Associates, Los Angeles, CA 2008 • Westside Industrial Park Warehouse Trip Generation, prepared for Premier Airport Park by King Engineering Associates, Jacksonville, FL 2008 • Trip Generation Study, Existing High-Cube Warehouse Facilities, Visalia CA, prepared for The Allen group by Peters Engineering Group, Clovis CA 2008 • Large-Scale Retail Distribution Centers, prepared for Walmart Sores, Inc. by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Tampa, FL 2007 • Trip Generation Study, High-Cube Warehouse Buildings, Fresno, California, prepared for Diversified Development Group by Peters Engineering Group, Clovis CA 2007 • Trip Generation Study, High Cube Warehouse, prepared by Schoor Depalma, Manalapan, NJ 2006 • San Bernardino/Riverside County Warehouse/Distribution Center Vehicle Trip Generation Study, prepared for NAIOP by Crain & Associates, Los Angeles, CA 2005 • Truck Trip Generation Study, prepared for City of Fontana (CA) by Transportation Engineering and Planning, Inc. 2003 • Trip Generation Analysis for High-Cube Warehouses, prepared for City of Livermore, CA by Fehr & Peers Associates, Lafayette, CA 1989 The data also includes site trip generation data provided by Texas A&M Transportation Institute (2008- 2009), Randall Parker (2007), and Washington State Department of Transportation (2002). The data were reviewed for their applicability and only acceptable sites with appropriate data are used in the analysis presented in the following section of this report. Some of the purported high-cube warehouses are instead standard storage warehouses or multi-building industrial parks. Some of the high-cube warehouse data for individual sites could not be used due to unexplained data characteristics (e.g., a significant imbalance in inbound and outbound daily vehicle trips). The final current database of HCW sites contains 107 data records with varying degrees of vehicle classification data and of daily and peak hour traffic counts. High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 12 HIGH-CUBE WAREHOUSE TRIP GENERATION DATA ANALYSIS 8 Classification of Individual Data Records Each record in the database of HCW sites was classified as one of five building types, defined earlier in this report. The criteria used to classify the sites represent information that is likely to be available at the time of site development review. The database includes one fulfillment center, one parcel hub, and nine HCWs with a significant cold storage component 9. The remaining 95 HCWs were separated into transload and short-term storage HCW based on two building configuration criteria: • A transload building is assumed to have a length-to-depth ratio of at least 2:1 and has loading docks on at least two sides (either opposite or adjacent); there are 56 transload data points • The remaining HCW sites (i.e., those that are not considered transload, cold storage, fulfillment center, or parcel hub) are classified as short-term storage HCWs; they total 39 sites Building configuration is known at the time of site development review but has the limitation of not necessarily being indicative of the function of the HCW activities. If additional characteristics can be identified that (1) are predictive of the HCW function and (2) are available at the time of site development review, the database can be reexamined and potentially reclassified and reanalyzed. Key Findings – Cars vs. Total Vehicles There is a significant correlation between the number of cars that enter and exit a HCW site and the total number of vehicles that enter and exit a HCW site. Table 4 lists the weighted averages for cars as a percentage of the total site-generated traffic at the five types of HCW. At short-term storage, transload, and cold storage HCWs, nearly 68 percent of the total daily site-generated vehicle trips are cars. During the AM peak hour, the measured percentage of cars is markedly similar (69 percent) to the daily (68 percent). During the PM peak hour, the measured percentage of cars is significantly higher (78 percent) than the daily value. The higher car percentage (and therefore, the lower truck percentage) is likely due to truck operations avoiding the afternoon peak period. The fulfillment center has a significantly higher percentage of cars during the AM and PM peak hours and daily (due largely to the significantly higher number of employees at a fulfillment center compared to the other types of HCWs). The parcel hub has a significantly lower percentage of cars (and therefore a higher percentage of trucks) during the AM and PM peak hours and daily. Table 4. Weighted Averages for Percentage of Total Daily Vehicles that are Cars, by Type of HCW Type of High-Cube Warehouse Cars as Percentage of Total Vehicles Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Short-Term Storage, Transload & Cold Storage (100) 67.8% 69.2% 78.3% Fulfillment Center (1) 91.2 97.2 98.2 Parcel Hub (1) 62.3 50.3 70.7 Note: The values in parentheses represent the number of data collection sites for HCW type. 8 This section presents key analysis findings. Appendix A presents additional analyses of the HCW data. 9 Sites were classified as cold storage either through self-categorization by data submitter (e.g., Walmart), by type of tenant (e.g., Ralphs, Publix), or by online site description (e.g., Americold, Millard Refrigeration Services). High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 13 Figure 2 is a plot of daily car trips versus daily vehicle trips generated at transload, short-term storage, and cold storage HCWs. The plot demonstrates strong correlation between the two trip-making characteristics of HCW sites. The data yields a linear fitted curve equation with an R2 value of 0.90. The correlation between the daily truck trips and daily vehicle trips is not as strong and yields a linear fitted curve equation R2 value that is less than the ITE acceptability threshold of 0.50. Figure 2. Correlation between Daily Cars and Total Daily Traffic at Transload, Short-Term Storage and Cold Storage HCW Sites Key Findings – Daily Trip Generation Table 5 compares daily trip rates for the five different types of HCWs. The table includes weighted average rates for all vehicles, cars, trucks, and 5-or-more-axle trucks. The table also includes the weighted average rate for daily vehicle trips contained in ITE Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition, for high-cube warehouses (land use code 152). The single fulfillment center count was taken during a holiday shopping season when activity would be expected to be higher than an annual average. Table 5. Weighted Average Rates for Daily Trips at High-Cube Warehouses Type of High-Cube Warehouse Weighted Average for Daily Trips per 1,000 GSF10 All Vehicles Cars Trucks 5+ Axle Trucks Transload & Short-Term Storage (91) 1.432 1.000 0.454 0.233 Cold Storage (9) 2.115 1.282 0.836 0.749 Fulfillment Center (1) 8.178 7.461 0.717 0.242 Parcel Hub (1) 10.638 6.631 4.007 0.982 ITE Trip Generation Manual – 9th Edition 1.68 -- -- -- Note: The values in parentheses represent the number of data collection sites for HCW type. 10 The weighted average rates for cars and trucks may not sum to match the “all vehicle” rates because some data sources collected total vehicle trips and did not separate cars and trucks. High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 14 Fulfillment Center and Parcel Hub Based on data from single data points, it is likely that vehicle trip generation rates for fulfillment centers and parcel hubs are significantly different from those at other HCW sites. The single fulfillment center has a substantially higher vehicle trip generation rate than transload, short- term storage, and cold storage HCW sites. The higher rate is due both to a higher number of passenger cars (i.e., employees) entering and exiting the site and to the count being conducted in December during the holiday shopping season. The single parcel hub HCW has a rate that is higher than even the fulfillment center for all vehicles. The rate for trucks (both total and 5+ axle) is substantially higher than for the other HCW types. Cold Storage For the relatively small number of data points in the HCW database that are classified as cold storage facilities, there is a strong correlation between vehicle trips and building gross square footage. Figure 3 is a plot of daily total vehicle trips versus building gross square footage at all cold storage facilities in the database. The data yields a linear fitted curve equation with an R2 value of 0.69. As recommended in ITE Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition, the fitted curve should be considered acceptable only within the building site size range in the dataset11. The weighted average rate (shown above in Table 5) is 2.115 total vehicles per 1,000 GSF for a cold storage HCW site. Figure 3. Correlation between Daily Total Vehicles and Cold Storage GSF (All Sites) Figure 4 presents the data plot for daily trucks. The plot includes a fitted curve equation with an acceptable R2 value. The weighted average rate for daily trucks at a cold storage HCW is 0.836 trucks per 1,000 GSF. 11 The best correlation is found for sites with gross square footage of 500,000 or less, with greater data scatter for larger buildings. Nevertheless, there are several sites with gross square footage of more than 500,000 that have daily vehicle trip generation rates that mirror the small sites. High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 15 Figure 4. Correlation between Daily Trucks and Cold Storage GSF (SCAQMD & NAIOP Sites) Transload and Short-Term Storage It would be expected that a transload site could generate a different number of vehicle trips than a short- term storage HCW. But, as currently classified in this report, the sites that fall into the two categories show very little difference between the two. Therefore, the two types are analyzed together in this report. If an appropriate building characteristic can be identified at the time of site development review, the sites in the database can be re-examined and potentially reclassified and the trip-generating characteristics reanalyzed. For this combination of HCW types, the relationship between building gross square footage and vehicle trips does not produce an acceptable level of correlation to develop a fitted curve equation. Figure 5 presents a plot of daily vehicle trips against building square footage. The weighted average rate for transload and short-term storage HCW sites is 1.432 daily vehicle trips per 1,000 GSF (listed earlier in Table 5). As a point of comparison, this rate is lower than the weighted average rate of 1.68 provided in ITE Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition, for the High-Cube Warehouse land use. The transload and short-term storage HCW dataset is much larger than the other HCW datasets. This larger dataset exhibits much greater scatter than the smaller datasets. This circumstance suggests that more data for the other HCW facility types are necessary to determine if the small dataset high correlations are accurate and justified. High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 16 Figure 5. Daily Vehicle Trips at Transload and Short-Term Storage HCW Figure 6 presents a plot of daily truck trips against building square footage at transload and short-term storage HCW. For trucks, the weighted average rate is 0.454 trucks per 1,000 GSF. Figure 6. Daily Truck Trips at Transload and Short-Term Storage HCW High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 17 Key Findings – Peak Hour Trip Generation Tables 6 and 7 list the weighted average rates for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively, for the five types of HCWs. The tables also include the weighted average rate for peak hour vehicle trips contained in ITE Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition, for high-cube warehouse (land use code 152). Table 6. Weighted Average Rates for AM Peak Hour Trips at High-Cube Warehouses Type of High-Cube Warehouse Weighted Average for AM Peak Hour Trips per 1,000 GSF All Vehicles Cars Trucks 5+ Axle Trucks Transload & Short-Term Storage (94) 0.082 0.057 0.024 0.015 Cold Storage (9) 0.103 0.061 0.038 0.027 Fulfillment Center (1) 0.841 0.818 0.023 0.009 Parcel Hub (1) 0.851 0.428 0.423 0.041 ITE Trip Generation Manual – 9th Edition 0.11 -- -- -- Note: The values in parentheses represent the number of data collection sites for HCW type. Table 7. Weighted Average Rates for PM Peak Hour Trips at High-Cube Warehouses Type of High-Cube Warehouse Weighted Average for PM Peak Hour Trips per 1,000 GSF All Vehicles Cars Trucks 5+ Axle Trucks Transload & Short-Term Storage (95) 0.108 0.086 0.023 0.010 Cold Storage (9) 0.129 0.087 0.042 0.031 Fulfillment Center (1) 1.979 1.944 0.035 0.013 Parcel Hub (1) 0.803 0.568 0.235 0.009 ITE Trip Generation Manual – 9th Edition 0.12 -- -- -- Note: The values in parentheses represent the number of data collection sites for HCW type. Fulfillment Center The single surveyed fulfillment center HCW has a significantly higher rate for passenger cars during both the AM and PM peak hours (as is the case for daily trips at the fulfillment center). The single fulfillment center count was taken during the December holiday shopping season. The single surveyed parcel hub HCW has significantly higher rates for both cars and trucks during both the AM and PM peak hours (as is the case for daily trips at the fulfillment center). Cold Storage For cold storage HCW, fitted curve equations can be developed for estimating total vehicles during the AM and PM peak hours. The equations are: • AM peak hour: y = 0.17x – 40 (R2 = 0.82) • PM peak hour: y = 0.17x – 35 (R2 = 0.83) The cold storage HCW weighted average rates during the AM and PM peak hours are, respectively, 0.103 and 0.129 total vehicle trips per 1,000 GSF. Both rates are close to the ITE Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition rate for all high-cube warehouses (land use code 152). High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 18 Transload and Short-Term Storage Data plots for the AM and PM peak hours (not presented in this report) are comparable to the daily plot in terms of data scatter and little correlation. The weighted average rates for the AM and PM peak hours are: • 0.082 total vehicles per 1,000 GSF during the AM peak hour • 0.108 total vehicles per 1,000 GSF during the PM peak hour As points of comparison, these rates are lower than the AM and PM weighted average rates of 0.11 and 0.12, respectively, provided in ITE Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition for the High-Cube Warehouse land use. The weighted average rates for truck trips at transload and short-term storage HCWs during the AM and PM peak hours are: • 0.024 trucks per 1,000 GSF during the AM peak hour • 0.023 trucks per 1,000 GSF during the PM peak hour High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 19 RECOMMENDATIONS The preceding analysis of available HCW trip generation data identified significant weaknesses in the ability to forecast vehicle trips with confidence. The following recommendations present a plan of action for quantifying necessary vehicle trip estimates to an acceptable level of precision for all types of HCWs. Fulfillment Center HCW The single available data point indicates that the trip generation characteristics (total vehicle trips and trips by vehicle type) for a fulfillment center HCW are significantly different from those for all other types of HCWs. A targeted data collection effort should be undertaken (as described below) to achieve a total of at least six sites. Included should be circulation of a Call for Data by ITE that specifically requests data for fulfillment centers. If future analysis reveals an unacceptable level of stability in the trip generation relationships, data should be collected at additional sites. Parcel Hub HCW The single available data point indicates that the trip generation characteristics (total vehicle trips and trips by vehicle type) for a parcel hub HCW are significantly different from those for all other types of HCWs. It is recommended that ITE circulate a Call for Data that specifically requests data for parcel hubs. A targeted data collection effort should be undertaken (as described below) to achieve a total of at least six sites. If future analysis reveals an unacceptable level of stability in the trip generation relationships, data should be collected at additional sites. Cold Storage HCW The limited data available for cold storage facilities produce acceptable levels of statistical precision for the estimation of vehicle trips. However, vehicle trip generation rates based on recently collected data are higher than those derived from data collected at least 10 years ago. It is recommended that (1) further investigation be made into the existing data and (2) additional data be collected. The cold storage sites in the database are classified as such based on the interpretation of the data submitter. Confirmation of the applicability of the cold storage classification can be completed through determination of the proportion of the HCW building space devoted to cold storage. This information will also help in the development of a clear definition of cold storage facilities and their characteristics. If some of the cold storage sites are reclassified, a targeted data collection effort should be undertaken (as described below) to achieve a total of at least six sites. Included should be circulation of a Call for Data by ITE that specifically requests data for cold storage facilities. If future analysis reveals an unacceptable level of stability in the trip generation relationships, data should be collected at additional sites. Transload and Short-Term Storage HCW The current database of sites for this subset of HCW types has been separated in accordance with building and dock configurations specified earlier in this report. To use a metaphor, it is possible that instead of separating the sites into apples and oranges, the sites have been separated into two sets that each contain both apples and oranges. The result is a pair of databases that (1) are not significantly different from each other in terms of trip generation and (2) do not yield satisfactory levels of correlation between building gross square footage and vehicle trips. It is possible that a more accurate allocation of the available data points between the two types of HCWs could produce better predictive relationships. High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 20 It is recommended that an analysis and evaluation of potential stratifications be undertaken and an appropriate set of data (along with a weighted average rate) be selected for use as interim rates until further study is complete (as described below). Overall It is recommended that a targeted data collection plan be undertaken in an attempt to further define and identify relationships between potential independent variables and vehicle trips generated at each type of HCW. A six-step process is presented below. Step 1: Select 15 Sites12 with Similar Characteristics for Data Collection and Further Analysis • For each site, compile the data specified earlier in Table 3 • If the Table 3 data are available for the sites at which SCAQMD or NAIOP collected data, these sites and their data can be considered part of the initial 15 • Limit sites to one or two metropolitan regions. Preference should be given to a region with an existing freight model that disaggregates truck trips and commodity flow to the county or traffic analysis zone level, for cross-referencing purposes. Step 2: Collect Data at the Initial 15 Sites • Collect the vehicle volume data specified in Table 8 Step 3: Analyze Complete Data for Consistency and Correlation with One or More Independent Variables • If consistency and correlations are found, skip to Step 5 Step 4: Identify 15 Additional Sites and Undertake Data Collection • Summarize and analyze results, assessing consistency • The results will set an approximate expectation for future data. They may be described statistically and/or in other clear terms. • If variability is still considered significantly high by ITE standards, assess probable causes, further partition data into more subgroups, and reanalyze data. Use results to determine how to classify warehouse types for future data collection. Step 5: Identify 15 Sites and Collect Data for Next Priority HCW Classification • 15-30 sites (including usable existing data) in at least two metropolitan regions (may be selected to reflect funding sources) • 3 year-long counts • Compare year-long counts from second HCW type with those from first HCW type to determine if additional year-long counts are needed to show variability in different types of HCWs 12 For a database with substantial uniformity in the characteristics that influence trip generation, a relatively small number of sites can produce predictive relationships with excellent statistical reliability (for example, perhaps the cold storage facilities). However, for sites with substantial variability, a database total of approximately 30 sites is typically recommended based on the central limit theorem. The theorem states that the sampling distribution of the means will approach that of a normal distribution with that quantity of data points even if the population being sampled is not normally distributed. High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 21 Step 6: Summarize and analyze data for each type of HCW, developing rates and equations where correlation is suitable. Identify patterns, trends, and other findings relevant to estimating HCW trip generation for use in TIAs and AQAs. Assess how many HCW types are needed/justified. Table 8. Minimum Data Collection for Each HCW Type • 15 sites including those for which there are usable existing data • One or two metropolitan regions – preference should be for a region with an existing freight model that disaggregates truck trips and commodity flow to the county or TAZ level, for cross- referencing purposes • Similar site characteristics (to minimize variability of results (desirably most common in metro region where data to be collected) • 1-2 NAICS industrial codes – we may need to loosen this requirement in order to find 15 acceptable sites in a single metropolitan area; we may need to use data from sites in multiple metropolitan areas; should be used in site selection process, not as a prescriptive requirement • Year-long count at 3 sites • All counts by video; all files to be retained for possible future use; examine via simultaneous video and tube counts what the discrepancy rates might be for purpose classification based physical vehicle types and standard FHWA classes versus actually seeing the trucks on video • All counts to follow ITE site trip generation count procedures with counts being made directionally by vehicle classification and recorded by driveway, by direction, and by 15 minute period so they can be checked (and reconstructed if necessary) High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 22 APPENDIX A. SUPPLEMENTAL DETAILED DATA ANALYSIS Data Analysis Process The database of 106 HCWs with vehicle trip generation data consists of one fulfillment center, one parcel hub, nine cold storage, 56 transload, and 39 short-term storage. For each data record, a range of traffic count data is available. • For many records, a daily count is provided. For many records, AM and PM peak hour traffic counts are provided. • For some data records, the count data is reported simply as total vehicles. In some records, the vehicle counts are classified as cars or trucks. In some records, the vehicle counts are classified as cars and trucks, disaggregated by number of axles. The data were disaggregated and aggregated in a variety of ways to help determine the effects of certain potential variables on vehicle trip generation. • The entire database for each facility type • Only the recent SCAQMD-sponsored data collection sites • Only the recent NAIOP-sponsored data collection sites • The combination of the recent SCAQMD- and NAIOP-sponsored data collection sites • All data except for the recent SCAQMD- and NAIOP-sponsored data collection sites • Sites with at least 500,000 gross square footage • Sites with at least 800,000 gross square footage • Sites with at least 1 million gross square footage • Sites with data collected prior to 2007 • Sites with data collected after 2006 • Sites with data collected prior to 2010 • Sites with data collected after 2009 • Only California sites • Only sites with close proximity to major port facilities The vehicle count data were analyzed separately for the fulfillment center, parcel hub, cold storage, transload, and short-term storage HCWs. • The results for fulfillment center, parcel hub, and cold storage are distinctly different from each other and are addressed separately below • The results for transload and short-term storage HCWs are not substantially different from each other and are treated in combination below The database enabled the compilation of over 1,500 subsets of HCW trip generation data that reflect: • 7 different combinations of building types, • 6 different sets for individual vehicle classifications or combinations, • 13 different subsets of the database, and • 3 different time periods (daily, AM, PM) High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 23 Weighted averages of vehicles per 1,000 gross square feet in the building were computed for each subset. Data plots with best fit linear curves were prepared for each subset. Examination of the data yields very few definitive relationships between site characteristics and vehicle trip generation. Key findings from these analyses are presented below. Cars vs. Total Vehicles Table A1 presents the weighted averages for cars, trucks, and 5+ axle trucks as a percentage of total daily vehicles measured at HCW sites. Separate calculations are presented for the entire database and for13 different subsets. When the complete set is included, the overall average is approximately 68 percent cars and 32 percent trucks of the total daily vehicles. There is minimal variation between the most recent data sources (SCAQMD and NAIOP) or between different building sizes. However, the more recent average data (post-2006 and post-2009) has a higher proportion of cars than does the older data collection sites. Table A1. Weighted Averages for Percentage of Total Daily Vehicles for Cars and Trucks Data Site Subset Percentage of Total Daily Vehicles Cars Trucks 5+ Axle Trucks All 67.8% 32.2% 19.4% SCAQMD 69.0 31.0 17.7 NAIOP 68.6 31.4 21.8 SCAQMD & NAIOP 68.8 31.2 19.0 Non-SCAQMD or NAIOP 66.6 33.4 --- More than 500,000 GSF 68.7 31.3 19.2 More than 800,000 GSF 69.4 30.6 18.5 More than 1,000,000 GSF 70.3 29.7 21.2 Pre-2007 62.1 37.9 --- Post-2006 70.1 29.9 19.5 Pre-2010 60.9 39.1 28.2 Post-2009 70.7 29.3 19.0 California Only 67.6 32.4 18.9 Cold Storage HCW If the cold storage HCW data are restricted to only include data collected under sponsorship of SCAQMD and NAIOP within the past eight years, the correlation between daily total vehicles and site gross square footage can be improved beyond the full dataset correlation. Figure A1 presents the data plot and associated fitted curve 13. As recommended in ITE Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition, the fitted curve should be considered acceptable only within the building site size range in the dataset. 13 Granted, the improved correlation in Figure A3 is due in part to requiring correlation to only four data points. High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 24 Figure A1. Correlation between Daily Total Vehicles and Cold Storage GSF (SCAQMD & NAIOP Sites) Correlation is also exhibited for cars, trucks, and 5+ axle trucks for daily traffic generated at cold storage facilities. Figures A2, A3, and A4 present the data plots for cars, trucks, and 5+ axle trucks, respectively. As recommended in ITE Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition, the fitted curves should be considered acceptable only within the building site size range in the dataset. Figure A2. Correlation between Daily Cars and Cold Storage GSF (SCAQMD & NAIOP Sites) High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 25 Figure A3. Correlation between Daily Trucks and Cold Storage GSF (SCAQMD & NAIOP Sites) Figure A4. Correlation between Daily 5+ Axle Trucks and Cold Storage GSF (SCAQMD & NAIOP Sites) Table A2 presents the weighted average rates for all vehicles, cars, trucks, and 5+ axle trucks per 1,000 GSF at cold storage sites. Separate calculations are presented for the complete database plus 13 different subsets. When the complete set is included, the overall weighted average rate for all vehicles is 2.12. The rate is nearly identical whether calculated with only the SCAQMD and NAIOP data or with the other data points in the complete dataset. Another observation from the table is that newer data (post-2006 and post-2009) have higher rates than do the older data, sometimes substantially higher. The newer and older datasets are comprised of relatively small numbers of data points, 6 and 3, respectively. Additional data points would be helpful to derive a more reliable estimate of cold storage HCW trip generation. High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 26 Table A2. Weighted Average Rates for Daily Trips at Cold Storage Facilities Data Site Subset (Cold Storage) Weighted Average for Daily Trips per 1,000 GSF All Vehicles Cars Trucks 5+ Axle Trucks All (9) 2.115 1.282 0.836 0.749 (4) SCAQMD (3) 2.466 1.265 1.201 0.858 NAIOP (1) 1.179 0.564 0.615 0.455 SCAQMD & NAIOP (4) 2.120 1.077 1.043 0.749 Non-SCAQMD or NAIOP (5) 2.111 1.449 0.667 --- More than 500,000 GSF (5) 2.009 1.121 0.888 0.772 More than 800,000 GSF (3) 2.179 1.242 0.938 0.968 More than 1,000,000 GSF (3) 2.179 1.242 0.938 0.968 Pre-2007 (3) 1.868 1.134 0.706 --- Post-2006 (6) 2.278 1.368 0.910 0.749 Pre-2010 (3) 1.868 1.134 0.706 --- Post-2009 (6) 2.278 1.368 0.910 0.749 California Only (5) 2.114 1.077 1.043 0.749 Port Only (5) 2.114 1.077 1.043 0.749 Note: The values in parentheses represent the number of data collection sites for that particular subset of cold storage sites. Tables A3 and A4 repeat the information presented in Table A2, but for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Table A3. Weighted Average Rates for AM Peak Hour Trips at Cold Storage Facilities Data Site Subset (Cold Storage) Weighted Average for AM Peak Hour Trips per 1,000 GSF All Vehicles Cars Trucks 5+ Axle Trucks All (9) 0.103 0.061 0.038 0.027 SCAQMD (3) 0.124 0.070 0.054 0.026 NAIOP (1) 0.071 0.039 0.032 0.029 SCAQMD & NAIOP (4) 0.110 0.062 0.048 0.027 Non-SCAQMD or NAIOP (5) 0.098 0.061 0.030 --- More than 500,000 GSF (5) 0.092 0.054 0.038 0.028 More than 800,000 GSF (3) 0.099 0.058 0.041 0.030 More than 1,000,000 GSF (3) 0.099 0.058 0.041 0.030 Pre-2007 (3) 0.084 0.046 0.025 --- Post-2006 (6) 0.115 0.070 0.045 0.027 Pre-2010 (3) 0.084 0.046 0.025 --- Post-2009 (6) 0.115 0.070 0.045 0.027 California Only (5) 0.116 0.062 0.048 0.027 Port Only (5) 0.116 0.062 0.048 0.027 Note: The values in parentheses represent the number of data collection sites for that particular subset of cold storage sites. High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 27 Table A4. Weighted Average Rates for PM Peak Hour Trips at Cold Storage Facilities Data Site Subset (Cold Storage) Weighted Average for PM Peak Hour Trips per 1,000 GSF All Vehicles Cars Trucks 5+ Axle Trucks All (9) 0.117 0.080 0.037 0.029 SCAQMD (3) 0.129 0.087 0.042 0.031 NAIOP (1) 0.089 0.050 0.039 0.026 SCAQMD & NAIOP (4) 0.118 0.077 0.041 0.029 Non-SCAQMD or NAIOP (5) 0.117 0.083 0,034 --- More than 500,000 GSF (5) 0.106 0.069 0.037 0.029 More than 800,000 GSF (3) 0.116 0.079 0.037 0.029 More than 1,000,000 GSF (3) 0.116 0.079 0.037 0.029 Pre-2007 (3) 0.097 0.058 0.037 --- Post-2006 (6) 0.131 0.093 0.038 0.029 Pre-2010 (3) 0.097 0.058 0.037 --- Post-2009 (6) 0.131 0.093 0.038 0.029 California Only (5) 0.117 0.077 0.041 0.029 Port Only (5) 0.117 0.077 0.041 0.029 Note: Values in parentheses represent the number of data collection sites for that particular subset. Transload and Short-Term Storage HCW Weighted average rates for daily trips at transload and short-term storage HCWs are listed in Table A5 for four vehicle classifications (all vehicles, car, truck, and 5+ axle truck) and for the complete database plus 13 subsets. One observation about the data is that the more recent data sites have, on average, lower daily trip generation rates (for all vehicle types) than the older sites 14. This relationship is also found for the AM and PM peak hours presented in Tables A6 and A7. Table A5. Weighted Average Rates for Daily Trips at Transload and Short-Term Storage HCW Data Site Subset (Transload & Short-Term Storage) Weighted Average for Daily Trips per 1,000 GSF All Vehicles Cars Trucks 5+ Axle Trucks All 1.432 1.000 0.454 0.233 SCAQMD 1.412 1.006 0.406 0.217 NAIOP 1.069 0.749 0.339 0.276 SCAQMD & NAIOP 1.275 0.901 0.374 0.221 Non-SCAQMD or NAIOP 1.701 1.183 0.603 --- More than 500,000 GSF 1.433 1.008 0.431 0.223 More than 800,000 GSF 1.417 0.978 0.405 0.200 More than 1,000,000 GSF 1.493 1.044 0.392 0.257 Pre-2007 1.653 1.203 0.732 --- Post-2006 1.397 0.994 0.402 0.233 Pre-2010 1.621 1.097 0.708 0.614 Post-2009 1.347 0.970 0.377 0.221 California Only 1.226 0.871 0.388 0.221 Port Only 1.258 0.871 0.388 0.221 ITE Trip Generation Manual – 9th Edition 1.68 -- -- -- 14 A decline in HCW auto traffic is likely because of a reduction in employee density as HCWs have become more automated. The reduction in truck trips does not have a clear explanation. Continued data collection is recommended to enable the development of current trip generation rates that do not need to rely on older data. High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis 28 Tables A6 and A7 list the weighted average rates for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Table A6. Weighted Average Rates for AM Peak Hour Trips at Transload and Short-Term Storage HCW Data Site Subset (Transload & Short-Term Storage) Weighted Average for AM Peak Hour Trips per 1,000 GSF All Vehicles Cars Trucks 5+ Axle Trucks All 0.082 0.057 0.024 0.015 SCAQMD 0.073 0.049 0.024 0.013 NAIOP 0.060 0.040 0.019 0.016 SCAQMD & NAIOP 0.068 0.046 0.022 0.014 Non-SCAQMD or NAIOP 0.100 0.075 0.028 0.022 More than 500,000 GSF 0.078 0.055 0.023 0.014 More than 800,000 GSF 0.074 0.050 0.022 0.014 More than 1,000,000 GSF 0.078 0.049 0.025 0.022 Pre-2007 0.110 0.087 0.032 0.016 Post-2006 0.079 0.057 0.022 0.015 Pre-2010 0.101 0.073 0.032 0.022 Post-2009 0.072 0.051 0.021 0.014 California Only 0.067 0.045 0.023 0.014 Port Only 0.071 0.046 0.023 0.014 ITE Trip Generation Manual – 9th Edition 0.11 Table A7. Weighted Average Rates for PM Peak Hour Trips at Transload and Short-Term Storage HCW Data Site Subset (Transload & Short-Term Storage) Weighted Average for PM Peak Hour Trips per 1,000 GSF All Vehicles Cars Trucks 5+ Axle Trucks All 0.108 0.086 0.023 0.010 SCAQMD 0.081 0.060 0.021 0.010 NAIOP 0.091 0.075 0.016 0.010 SCAQMD & NAIOP 0.085 0.066 0.019 0.010 Non-SCAQMD or NAIOP 0.135 0.117 0.028 0.015 More than 500,000 GSF 0.108 0.087 0.022 0.010 More than 800,000 GSF 0.110 0.087 0.022 0.009 More than 1,000,000 GSF 0.120 0.097 0.019 0.010 Pre-2007 0.145 0.133 0.031 0.012 Post-2006 0.107 0.086 0.020 0.010 Pre-2010 0.141 0.122 0.031 0.015 Post-2009 0.091 0.072 0.019 0.010 California Only 0.082 0.063 0.019 0.010 Port Only 0.086 0.065 0.019 0.010 ITE Trip Generation Manual – 9th Edition 0.12 Tables A5, A6, and A7 also include the ITE Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition, weighted average rate for high-cube warehouses (land use code 152). The data analyzed in this report generally produce lower rates than contained in Trip Generation Manual. I-1 5 FLINT ST MINTHORN STCHANEY ST2ND STTHIRD STPOE STPOTTERY ST SILVER STDAVIS STCOLLIER AVE MOHR STCRANE STC A MIN O D E L N O R T E RILEY STDEXTER AVE LEWIS STBIRCH STLANGSTAFF STI-1 5 S B O F F LOWELL STSCRIVENER STI-15 NBONLINDSAY STSILVER STCOLLIER AVE I-15 I-1 5 FLINT ST MINTHORN STCHANEY ST2ND STTHIRD STPOE STPOTTERY ST SILVER STDAVIS STCOLLIER AVE MOHR STCRANE STC A MIN O D E L N O R T E RILEY STDEXTER AVE LEWIS STBIRCH STLANGSTAFF STI-1 5 S B O F F LOWELL STSCRIVENER STI-15 NBONLINDSAY STSILVER STCOLLIER AVE I-15 Planning Application No. 2018-49APN: 377-160-014VICINITY MAP PROJECT SITE ´ I-15 MINTHORN ST CHANEY STSILVER ST2ND STCOLLIER AVEBIRCH STI-15 COLLIER AVE Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics,CNES/Airbus DS, U SDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS UserCommunity I-15 MINTHORN ST CHANEY STSILVER ST2ND STCOLLIER AVEBIRCH STI-15 COLLIER AVE Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics,CNES/Airbus DS, U SDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS UserCommunity Planning Application No. 2018-49APN: 377-160-014AERIAL MAP PROJECT SITE ´ H H H H HH H H LOT 9 O F B L K 8 9 HEA L D S R E S U B D I V I S I O N MB 8 / 3 7 8 - - I PROJECT DATA: BUILDING 2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SITE AREA: FOOTPRINT 7,000 S F LAND USE: LI 00 3 GROSS: 4.79 AC MEZZANINE @ 5% 2,000 SF ZONING : M1 � 208,638 SF MIN . LOT AREA .46AC TOTAL BUILDING AREA 39,000 SF MAX. F.A. R.: 0.45 — BUILDING AREA: STREET TOTAL FOOTPRINT: 86,140 SF BLDG 2 PARCEL AREA: FRONTAGE WIDTH : 100 FT M EZZANIN E: @ 6% 5,000 SF GROSS : 2.01 AC TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 911140 SF 87,377 SF BUILDING SETBACKS: or W M I NTHORN STREET FAR: 0.44 FRONT: 20 FT Q COVERAGE: 41% FAR: 0.45 SIDE YARD ROW: 20 FT N 00 SID E: 0 FT 1 BUILDING 1 BUILDING USE REAR: 0 FT 1 FOOTPRINT ° 30,940 SF WAREHOUSE 35,000 SF . LANDSCAPE IN MEZZANINE @ 6 /° 2,000 SF BUILDING HEIGHT. 40 FT - - —— — — — — — — — - - TOTAL BUILDING AREA 32,940 SF OFFICE @ 10% 4,000 SF ' 170' 1 REQUIRED PARKING LANDSCAPE SETBACKS: . ' — OFFICE �� BLDG 1 PARCEL AREA: WAREHOUSE 1/1000 SF 35 STALLS FRONT: 20 FT 1 24 16' I SIDE: 5 FT z 1 SETBACK N , G ROSS: 1.77 AC OFFICE 1/500 S F 8 STALLS 2 77,152 S F R EAR: 5 FT 1 TOTAL 43 STALLS 1 26' FAR: 0.43 LANDSCAPE MIN . 15' 30 3 0' BLDG 3 PROVIDED PARKING DEDICATION ADJ . TO STREET: AVG . 20 18,200 SF AUTO 63 STALLS � _ BUILDING USE LANDSCAPE REQ.: 12% BLDG 2 1000 SF MEZZ WAREHOUSE 28,940 SF REQ, ACCESSIBLE 3 STALLS UJ 19,200 SF GROSS _ OFFICE 12% 4 000 SF OFF-STREET PARKING : � 37,000 S F _ Cy @ , +2,000 SF MEZZ p CLR.HGT: 26' p REQUIRED PARKING DOCK DOORS STANDARD: 9x18 QE0 N WAREHOUSE 1/1000 SF 29 STALLS DOCK- HIGH DOORS 3 COMPACT. CN 39,000 SF GROSS OFFICE 1/500 SF 8 STALLS COMPACT %: N REQ: 22 STALLS 0 GRADE- LEVEL DOORS 1 CLR.HGT. 26 TOTAL 37 STALLS BUILDING 3 DRIVE AISLE: 26 FT PROV: 39 STALLS FIR E LAN E: 210 200 SF,FOOTPRINT 18 1 REQ. 63 STALLS PROVIDED PARKING OVERHANG : 2 FT PROV: 63 STALLS771 AUTO 65 STALLS MEZZANINE @ 5% 1,000 SF TREE WELL: w 1 O 60 REQ. ACCESSIBLE 3 STALLS TOTAL BUILDING AREA 19,200 SF w REQ. PARKING RATIO BY USE: 1 40 -- DOCK DOORS WAREHOUSE: 1/1000 SF � LANDSCAPE -- ' w BLDG 3 PARCEL AREA. UJI � / � 1 __ __ DOCK- HIGH DOORS 3 G ROSS : 1 .01 AC 1 Poo. F== U_ x • • • • Q 0 GRADE- LEVEL DOORS 1 44 130 SF w I o 1 1 _ Poo. 6 0 116 - p U z 1 1 130' U) = i i L_JL z FAR: 0.44 CV J BUILDING USE LT I I WAREHOUSE 17,200 SF 1 20' 1 _ 15' OFFICE @ 10% 21000 SF >�__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ UTURE DEDICATION 1 1 CY) REQUIRED PARKING WAREHOUSE 1/1000 SF 18 STALLS OFFICE 1/500 SF 4 STALLS 1 - -- -- " TOTAL 22 STALLS PROVIDED PARKING �` AUTO 39 STALLS I LANDSCAPE� _ 26, 26' REQ. A CCESSISL E 2 STALLS U- I BLDG 1 0 GF: ±30,940 SF - DOCK DOORS MEZZ: ±2,000 SF DOCK- HIGH DOORS 2 I 1 N ±32 940 SF GROSS 0 GRADE- LEVEL DOORS 1 CLR.HGT: 26' II REQ: 37 STALLS 1 PROV: 65 STALLS 0 I _ # I 1 276' X LEGEND : Target Q P Extra Space Storage O c}ac rVP ryca �dss° caa -/- PROPOSED BUILDING AREA VJ EXISTING SCREEN WALL `ay\ � q� Camping para caravanas e Elsmore Hills RV Park q a° � cos OFFICE AREA ry F dsaOPa 'Li'rho C°e sr LANDSCAPING AREA OTienda de deportes Labeda PAVED AREA Spectrum Q �401-699 West �astton Ave Minthorn Street ADOCKDOOR P Riverside Public ` � Social Services� i W DRIVE I N DOOR �F Instituto de High Schoch ° Qy Ortega High School Ci 0 crr cekr Si'/off/ P°-9 'S nsq'° aid P Elsinore valley 9De ®Municipal Water District Pa¢ Warm Springs aA¢ Valley iJ¢ G,cac¢`1 Uj /rnf St NORTH � � wd,� Lake Elsinore °�,, �t Public Works() y ` w p0 Gaoe`I`' c fiery y o • 3c o wpotterySt sr Z h wS4rn, �° This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of i 1" 301 entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information,and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed.1 `__________________________________—J 0 15 30 60 15o NORTH This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements scheme: 12.6 Conceptual Site Plan and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage shown PAG E Lake Elsinore Property I RV1 8-0165-00 is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal code WARE COMB 06.25.2019 SWC Chaney and Minthorn Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 2 compliance. PENNINGTON INDUSTRIAL PARK PRELIMINAf:?Y GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE �� 15 W �, W OWNER DEVELOPER � P I- v PENNINGTON INDUSTRIAL LLC (100) G _ +tit V '"', � � J Z J � 2'I�'1 �`�N LEGEND % TOLD CORPORATION, MANAGER I / p I I O Z U Z p Q o p N a+ti ti 621 VIA ALONDRA, SUITE 602 ? o - _ (50') I (50') ^ p ° �3 O O p o W W = a W o = + CAMARILLO, CA 93012 cn Q � o Q. ° o W o =Z a z Q V _ �� (R/W) EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY ATTN: ROD OSHITA o �, I W W W a z Z _ o _ EXISTING PROPERTY LINE PHONE: 310-939-7102 a N + �.90 J ° ° O p _- a a 'v Q N V •- \ \ I �,��. I I p V 0�p W l� O O 'w c0 O W W W W 2 / S° )Q N k p� S` W W W W 5 0 W W W W W x X - - PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINE ENGINEER eILI � � MUESCAL SIT E + + PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE 41689 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE, STE 126 SB&O INC. CANYON F.C. CHANNEL �) ) (�- - STREET CENTERLINE TEMECULA, CA 92590 ^ �CIIkiE) COHE) C❑ E) �g(E[�]E _ _ ATTN: DON BROOKS IMC 4j 4 - EXISTING CURB & GUTTER PHONE: 951-695-8900 CS -° <S8>��?�6 CS8) -a .�- < CS8) CS8)- VICINITY MAP 0 THOMAS BROS. PAGE 866 -- s 4� o cs5 )- c --- coo - -- - -- - - 5 --- EXISTING SIDEWALK GRID D3 -<wi2) o -<wi ^ w? 7 �275 75.7 0 _N 1276 75. 76.5 TC - wio <w>o>- - LEGAL DESCRIPTION FG •` C626)- EXISTING CONTOUR 1 I 3 \ - �., •(N46'1T47 W) (462.18') 76.4-- J _ ��626 - PROPOSED CONTOUR APN: 377-160-014 _ _ I 74.13 TO STATE 275.4T ' ' FG 76.7'a '141.72'' ;� 77.3 T THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED LAKE ELSINORE, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, �l �h,� �•i'. 'ter Yi'''. ' '' --7 '7 FG .;.' ' ' �FG DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: I� I 73 46IF , . ,i o a :�5:46 T ' : �.43 ,a,i',i, , . 0�` 1274.5 FG " ' •- v� ' FL -1275.5+'FG X4.57 - EX S E T ~ I 1 ��.;.;. 72.67 ti 73.46 io a aa;{�,e:a 1?)6, A A ACCESS j :; FL ' 1 - �/ PROPOSED SLOPE LOT 9 IN BLOCK 89 OF HEALDS RESUBDIVISION, IN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, COUNTY OF to-- I L + 74 8 ❑ ® 4.0X lb". RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8, PAGE 378 OF MAPS, E P I N 74.3 F EX TELEPHONE POLE' ' TC ' ' ' f� :e OFFICE J" F +tit ti2� PROPOSED CURB/CURB & GUTTER SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDS x~ � I FG 72.27 TO BE RELOCATED •95 76.100 FF + ,. Iv k 75.50 ?> 75 96 FS } (76.9) 1i UNDERGROUND ^ W + TO 1• 1: :' EG �p�° ss PROPOSED SEWER EXISTING EASEMENTS= 73 78 S 73 80 P A f FL 2 �� W2 PROPOSED WATER 0 0 W 75.84 E TG,LP THE EFFECT OF A DEED TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE FOR PUBLIC ROAD PURPOSES, N ✓ ° 0 TC,GB �' �i INCLUDING PUBLIC UTILITY AND PUBLIC SERVICE USES O ^� � 0� S SD18 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN ^ ' RECORDED: JANUARY 26 1979 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19172 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS 100', ci2��� �' � , ' ' <Se� - EXISTING SEWER 1979 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 137912 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS b � 72.7 � �'�'��� PARCEL 2 74 95 ° �lz `� � RE-RECORDED: DULY 2, co• 71.75 75.84 PARCEL ui RE-RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 22, 1980 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 172553 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. o (80) FG FL TC TC N; i - � cwi2� EXISTING WATER BUILDING 2 BUILDING 3 Me 50, � ( � U ;',;,� arc .9 2.0�' i+lS NCE U LITY -cS42>----- EXISTING STORM DRAIN � ) 50 :'.� 1275. 00 FF �2� 73.54 1 76. 00 F UTILITIES N FOR+ SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY �, d- + ;;;;^ + TG o, �.:{ (UGE) EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC. ^ d.� 04 tit rn SEWER & WATER. I Cu (30') 20' 1 ' ''''N u2�6� to N 7�84 + 00 FLIGHT DATE: 11-01-18, CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1 FOOT ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT j o- C EXISTING STREET LIGHT 31315 CHANEY STREET / R/W .' F563 o ? ��C R 6" EXISTING SINGLE TREE PROJECT INFORMATION LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 PHONE: 951 674-3146 I� DED 71.82 ti2�� I _ 75 00 `12�� o q ® ® EXISTING CATCH BASIN ( ) C� o (38) 40 ,<, FS + •89 r7 1.9% `1�'1;)4p Y v 1. GROSS AREA: 5.01 ACRES (12) -.10 FL,GB `r EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT NET AREA:4.79 ACRES ELECTRIC: I ",N . Z FS, S _ FH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON a 2'I 6 S/W� - 75.00 FF 74.95 FS,GB .; - o ❑ EXISTING METER / UTILITY LOT SUMMARY I I ti I �4 PKWY 74.96 FS �N to ;;' �° ° LOT 1: 74,915.00 SF, 1.72 AC 1351 E FRANCIS STREET g�' TC 74.80 a� I 6,39g $Y o ti co 0) •, ; ; 74 42 2 QMH EXISTING MAN HOLE LOT 2: 87,376.52 SF, 2.01 AC (MAX) ONTARIO, CA 91761 JEX G MH \ I 1` I I t` AD ACCESS ti2� FS,GB �' I o� o �� + ^^ ' ' o+� �° EXISTING LIGHT POLE LOT 3: 46,346.78 SF, 1.06 AC (MIN) PHONE: (909)-930-8591 I Qo + [ 76:. 0. T�. Q �� 74.7 3 Nry }': ® 5� 1• N ( )c� TOTAL: 208,638.30 SF, 4.79 AC GAS: SE ONC P A 'I �: OFFICE o o"� 6.3,E . °ofi 75.80 FS EG , Z ¢ UTILITY POLE 70.9 ^ of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY UTl P FG1 ao 7•`rQ0 [o � (f6) EXISTING SIGNS 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THREE INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS ADD ITI AL S i L �.v� �4.96 S ^ 75.30 T,C` i ° 155 S G STREET 1 74.92 TC ti '� Q 3. EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: M1 LIMITED 2 SAN BERNARDINO CA 92410 74.25 a E OWED i 74.83 N � . 74.80 F3° 74.42 FL + V �o EXISTING STREET SIGN MANUFACTURING ' 6 TC Z FS TO " +- ❑❑ 76 2 �6. 6 0 ° PHONE. (909) 335-7908 EX EE1�Ll '� - TC C ^ Z �1 EXISTING GATE BUILDING SETBACKS: N 99 � co - --- d- FRONT YARD: 20' '� i'i' ' R�- I 7 .40 �- - N -� EXISTING VALVE TELECOMMUNICATION: (�! 1 ^ : ;i; �Slt6�' 74 2 0 5 7 . 1274 75.40 TC Via, W 7 SIDE YARD (ROW): 20' CROWN CASTLE { {� - 1 4 EXISTING ARROW / STRAIGHT LANDSCAPE SETBACKS: 2000 CORPORATE DR � NLTC TC 4, 1 TO I l ti1 aW == ADJACENT TO STREET• MIN. 15'• AVERAGE 20' + ! �'' ao N 73.38 "� TC r'� :° I N EXISTING ARROW / TURNS CANONSBURB, PA 15317 l 1 I� �+ -� N N N " 1 1274 , T s 1 LANDSCAPE COVERAGE. 12� PHONE: (888) 632-0931 o v w FS,GB N46'17 47 W N �/2.91 TC 32.47 �' � ^ crl / 4. EXISTING LAND USE: LIMITED INDUSTRIAL 73 d- EXISTING ARROWS TURNS EX EDGE 0 72.95 300.66'-1273 72.30 72.41 FL W I 5. TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED: CHARTER SPECTRUM 4.8,°b' FL,H 0.5� TG LP 1.3.� 0.5X '� Z [�Ij S10P EXISTING TRAFFIC PAINT OFFSITE: STREETS, STREET LIGHTS, STRIPING, CONNECTION 7337 CENTRAL AVE EUR & c^ M � ) EXISTING TRAFFIC PAINT TO SEWER, WATER AND UTILITIES RIVERSIDE, CA 92504 ONSITF: DRAINAGE SEWER WATER UTILITIES GRADING S 71.18 7 NfBD ONLY YIEID ' Z TC S B 7 ,7 :�: 73.27 >� I I P ��� PHONE: (951) 406-1645 �' °'�°' '° �. of Z EX SO INL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION DATE: . . . Z 69. 6 K tiL Z PROPOSED ASPHALT PVMT N 68. 9 p w J.N46'17'47"W ' k 72.35 a EARTHWORK QUANTITY { II Q 1 73.83 73.57 73.12 Q a F= 2 c 00- c�� ic(Tb (T)- . .0 1.8x p 108.72 BLOCK , a PROPOSED CONCRETE PVI14T 7 .96 FS I 73.80 2 N �' EX INLET W W W W W ,�80`FS• 2 o W� s CUT: 695 C.Y. V 69•9 3.73�FS FS,GB o off. +ti p o v� 7 " y PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA FILL: 695 C.Y. U7 .73 FS Z 12 0 ti FG- 771. 00 CE N Z v o TG III J"d = EX EX EX EX PR 47 FS / 73. 6 0 ° w pV2W y o .. co PARCEL i NE'LY Sw'LY NW'LY SE'LY SE'LY AID�RAMP 1r��1 TC 72. o v�i vpi P Z, R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W BUILDINGS 1270.0o DocK 1 , u -Q. \ 1274.00 FF I Q (80) F Z B �ti 69.1 �9.24 FS12 +� V 73 68 � �'•. (60) 100 v FG 'j ��� TIC�3 M' 0 s (30') I (30) L (50,) I (30) 20' N 'I 73 5 a W 8 LOW FLOW SD 74.00 FF (12) R/W DED N N 68.8 y 73.4 FG 72.50 73.96 FS'� 3 7 FL (18') 20' 6' S/W (6' S/W) (40') 40' 16' S/W rn `Y FG ' ' 72.00 C 72.50 72.0Q , I f4• o P Q o' 72.50 FL HP 72.00 :1-T7;.1 ,74 � P VARIESVARIE (4)i EP VARIES IT TGLP FL VP TG LP , 4 VARIES 0-27BIO-CLEAN MODULARO FL HP TG 3 rS s > I (t12') (f8) �(13'-38') ' 1273.5 FGFb 0 a + WETLANDS SYSTEM / _ 442.22' - vl 6&3 (N46'18'10"W) (462.22') ' ti i.. / L PR S W i..: / I FG �� �S. -�1 (70.7) i (71.4) c12'I�, " �S' (72.7) (72.5) 3 I 74.2 k " 1 " EX S/W PR S/W ARKWAY DRAI i EG EG DOit#E-24 SQ 0 ° ° EG EG _ FG,, r SEE LEFT EX 8 CURB EX AC PR 8 CURB EX 8" CURB EX AC PVMT PR AC PR 8" CURB TC)(67.22 FL) �-� CTU E 1� SEE CONCEPTUAL SO b I �° - ] (71.5) & GUTTER PVMT PR AC & GUTTER I TUA LIT PLAN F�l� - - L J EG I pT & GUTTER PVMT & GUTTER E IBER d Ti v I<n - - W d 1 eL N DDI ONAL SO INFO o o EX 0 RHEAD E4 I o - -�- j o N SREALIGN IDEWALK TYPICAL SECTION TYPICAL SECTION 'NI,, Al I MINTHORN STREET CHANEY STREET EX VCP S +R3 o 0 t o OFFSI TE MWS i 6 ? ° ° p � - , EX ATCH .. BIOCLEAN STREET DESIGNATION: LOCAL STREET DESIGNATION: MAJOR ARTERIAL c, EX ELEC I I S, [ \\ .. BASIN (L-4-15-C) SCALE. 1 =20 (H;): 1 =4 (V) SCALE, 1 =20 (H.): 1 =4 lO �S Off' [o _ ] szo, T .. ° 6" SCHEDULE O l 40 PVC o SEE RIGHT Lill , EX C&G LE&L) z PRELIMINARY GRADING AND SHEET N0. DRAINAGE PLANBENCHMARK1 DESIGNATION: EL-35-80 SHEET INDEX PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING DESCRIPTION: DESCRIBED BY RIVERSIDE COUNTY FROM THE INTERSECTION OF 41689 Enterprise Circle North, Suite 126 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Temecula, Co. 92590 RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND LAKESHORE DRIVE SE 1.2 Ml. ALONG 1. PRELIMINARY GRADING & 951-695-8900 OF 2 c OF ABOVE ADDRESS, 32"-+ SW OFLAKESHORE DRIVE TO ADDRESS 7887 CENTER LINE OF AK SHORE NW GRAPHIC SCALE DRAINAGE PLAN &2• GRADING SECTIONS & TES 951-695-8901 Fax FOR TPM 37710 FILE N0. ABBREVIATIONS SCALE: "- MARK DATE INITIAL DESCRIPTION REC APPR DATE DRIVE, 7'f W OF PP #GT46349; 1'f S OF SURVEY MARKER POST. 40' 0 40' 80' 120' 1 -40 rr ELEVATION: 1264.84 FOR REVISION DATE: 7/1712019 FOR: PENNINGTON INDUSTRIAL LLC LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AC ASPHALT CONCRETE APN ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER A VE A VENUE BDRY BOUNDARY C&G CURB & GUTTER CL CENTERLINE CONC CONCRETE DED DEDICATION DWY DRIVEWAY DWG DRAWING EA EACH EG EXISTING GRADE ELEC ELEC71RC ELEV ELEVATION EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT CL R/W R ESMT EASEMENT 20' EX EXISTING FF FINISH FLOOR 50' 5' BENCH FG FINISHED GRADE CL R W U FF ELEV FH FIRE HYDRANT ' R/W FL FLOW LINE / R 20N 30' DED FO FIBER OPTIC FS FINISHED SURFACE W R1W GB GRADE BREAK W , EX GROUND Z 10' I / GTE GENERAL TELEPHONE & ELECTRIC 50 21 v 4' 6 S W GTR GUTTER I 20' R/W I 2'i 15 ' HP HIGH POINT W 30, DED I IE INVERT ELEVATION Z EX GROUND N EX 2'-3' LP LOW POINT Q 5' BENCH RETAINING SCREEN WALL LS LANDSCAPE v 10' SLOPE VARIES I PROTECT PLACE MB MAP BOOK ��S/W FF ELEV I I 2. 1 MAX 4 MH MANHOLE MIN MINIMUM I �I~4' 5' BENCH NAP NOT A PART I PR 8" C&G I 2' I PR 8 C&G FF ELEV NE'L Y NORTHEASTERLY NTS NOT TO SCALE _ _ _ SLOPE VARIES NW'LY NORTHWESTERLY — — I 2: 1 MAX PKWY PARKWAY i PL PROPERTY LINE I SLOPE VARIES PR PROPOSED I I 2.1 MAX PVC POLYVINYLE CHLORIDE PIPE GROUND PVMT PAVEMENTEARTHENRCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE EARTHEN SWALEjEX _ R/W RIGHT OF WAY SWALE SCE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SO STORM DRAIN SE'LY SOUTHEASTERLY SSF SQURE HT SHEET FOOT SECTION A A SECTION B—B SECTION C—C ST STREET SCALE:1-=20'(H.), 1-=2'(V) SCALE:1"=20'(H.); 1"=2'(V) SCALE:1"=20'(H.); 1"=2'(V) STD STANDARD SW'LY SOUTHWESTERLY SWR SEWER S/W SIDEWALK TO TOP OF CURB TG TOP OF GRATE R/W TI TRAFFIC INDEX TPM TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TYP TYPICAL VCP VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE PR CHAIN WQ WATER QUALITY LINK FENCE I R/W CL R/W EX TUBE WTR WATER STEEL FENCE W EX TUBE STEEL FENCE EX GROUND 15' I 30' I 20' 0 Z s' S/W 5' t15.7' �I4C&G 2 3' ' " EX GROUND 5 BENCH 1� I L— FF ELEV 1 oa SLOPE VARIES /� 5 BENCH / 2:1 MAX FF ELEV I SLOPE VARIES 2:1 MAX I I I I � EARTHEN I SLOPE VARIES EARTHEN SWALE 2. 1 MAX SWALE EX GROUND EARTHEN SWALE SECTION D—D SECTION E—E SECTION F—F .o SCALE: 1"=20'(H.), 1-=2'(V.) SCALE:1"=20'(H.); 1"=2'(V.) SCALE. 1"=20'(H.); 1"=2'(V.) .c 0 O 0 PRELIMINARY GRADING AND SHEET NO. l� ? DRAINAGE PLAN 2 PLANNING AGINEERING SURVEYING Temecula, Enterprise Circle North, Suite 126 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE r' Temecula, Ca. 92590 951-695-8900 �F zz 951-695-8901 Fax FOR TPM 37710 FILE NO. N SCALE: 1"=40' � MARK DATE INITIAL DESCRIPTION REC APPR DATE FOR REVISION DATE: 7/1712019 FOR: PENNINGTON INDUSTRIAL LLC t IWJ _ -� . Aw ........... 1■1 i 1 aw 1 ~fir I - _. __ �W.,..�-- � � � _.._,�..__ ,ter• ■ r ,�~. - '� - •. i. .ram. 'alter � .. �y• t: �� if { �' �4 _ •eh•. 4s+':m sk ■ - - TOP OF PARAPET .. ...... .- ^ - - - - - - - - - - - - , - 30'-0" goo _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLEAR HEIGHT - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24'-0" I FINISH GRADE • . / • 0'-Off ELEVATION BEYOND TOP OF PARAPET - - - - - - - - - - - - - , 32'-6" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - db CLEAR HEIGHT 24'-0" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ FINISH GRADE �SOUTH ELEVATION 0'-0" TOP OF PARAPET - - - - - - - - - - - - ,' 32'-6" ELEVATION BEYOND01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLEAR HEIGHT - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24'-0" TOP OF STOREFRONT , 107-0" , ® 0 ED FINISH GRADE • 0'-Off EAST ELEVATITOP OF PARAPET - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLEAR HEIGHT _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24'-0" FINISH GRADE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07-077 This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements BUILDING 1 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage 1/8° = 1--0" P E N N I N G T 0 N INDUSTRIAL WARE NIALCOMB 01 . 0 3 . 2 019 PAG E shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal } } 1 1 1 4 code compliance. 0 4' 8' 16 LAKE E LS I N 0 R E , CA - I RV 18-0165-00 t 'W1 _ -� - l No 1■1 i oil- Jim I - No- 4W III ■ ELEVATION BEYOND TOP OF PARAPET - - - - - - - - - - - - ,' 30'-0" - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLEAR HEIGHT - - - - - - - - - - - - 24'-0" FINISH GRADE TOP OF PARAPET ^ - - - - - - - - - - - - ,' 30'-0" - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - _ CLEAR HEIGHT 24'-0" IL -11 IL FINISH GRADE- FIN Ilk • 0'-0" TOP OF PARAPET 32'-6" CLEAR HEIGHT I AL AL 24'-0" TOP OF STOREFRONT - - - - - - - - - - - - , FINISH GRADE 01-01, �w ELEVATION BEYOND TOP OF PARAPET - - - - - - - - - - - - _ 307-0" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLEAR HEIGHT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24'-0" MOP hL 66;am 6m 41 FINISH GRADE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0'-0" This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements BUILDING 21 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage 1/8° = 1--0" P E N N I N G T 0 N INDUSTRIAL WARE NIALCOMB 01 . 0 3 . 2 019 PAG E shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal } } 1 1 1 6 code compliance. 0 4' 8' 16 LAKE E LS I N 0 R E , CA - I RV 18-0165-00 ------ -- ------- - - - - -- -- _- - - --------- -- ------ -- ------ -- ---�_ ------------------- ---- - __ -- - __ - --- �- ------ - _ ----------------- - __- �r ----------------- -- - - ---------------- _ - - _-` -�_------ - ,� ------------------- --- - ---- - _ _-- --- --- ---- �_�- --- - ------------- --------- ---- ------------- cow .4W. MAIR --- MOMENT- �-y TF Vim' 411 - 1 - - ---- - ------ -- ---� - - - - -._ _-..- -- %_ -- ----- - -- - - This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements BUILDING 3 1 PERSPECTIVE VIEW and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage WARECOMB 01 . 03 . 2019 PAGE PENNINGTON INDUSTRIAL shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal 7 code compliance. LAKE E LS I N 0 R E , CA - I RV 18-0165-00 ELEVATION BEYOND TOP OF PARAPET , - - - - - - - - - - - - , 30'-0" CLEAR HEIGHT 24'-0" - - FINISH GRADE WEST ELEVATION 01-071 TOP OF PARAPET 32'-6" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLEAR HEIGHT 71 24'-0" TOP OF STOREFRONT lop lop-oil FINISH GRADE r MMI • 0'-0" ELEVATION BEYOND TOP OF PARAPET- 30'-0" CLEAR HEIGHT - - - - - - - - - - - - ILM 241-071 ❑ ❑ T�A[ FINISH GRADE 01-077 TOP OF PARAPET ^ - - - - - - - - - - - - ,' 307-0" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLEAR HEIGHT - - - - - - - - - - - - 24'-0" FF - - - - - - - - - - - - FINISH GRADE 07-077 This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements BUILDING 3 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage 1/8° = 1--0" P E N N I N G T O N INDUSTRIAL WARE NIALCOMB 01 . 0 3 . 2 019 PAG E shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal } } 1 1 1 8 code compliance. 0 4' 8' 16 LAKE E LS I N 0 R E , CA - I RV 18-0165-00 CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 0 61-4 O w z f w O Co z � w � � w O z w O O � w O .V N 0 a)O ll� �4 w .c m c 0 O � � fU Q J w Q w O w c� 1 oz 1 2 3 A3.1 1 4 5 6 w 0 276'-0" _ .5 � 0 � � v Au m U .� 56'-6" 58'-0" 58'-0" 56'-6" 47'-0" o °�' r o `"22 '-11" 46'-1" w '� 10 00 m �, .� w � v + ca > rn rn a Q, .5 on t 26'-0" 26'-0" 27'-0" 16'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 16'-0" 27'-0" 26'-0" Q 3'-6" _ 3'-8" 8'-3" 3'-0" 8'L. -3" 8'-3" 3'-0" 2 EQ. SPACE,(). EQ. SPACE I I I I Q 1'-1 1/2" 6'-0" 1'-1 1/2" LL w U U U U O O O o O n ii li i u- C,) I I I L I Q A F.O.C. F.O.C. P.J. JA U% L OUTLINE OF CANOPY ABOVE. I I I I o `? ALUMINUM STOREFRONT DOOR w WITH 1"INSULATED GLASS. w N I I I I co N C'') - . . - .. Co w o? TRUCKWELL d ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM I I I I m _ N WITH 1"INSULATED.GLASS.TYP. Q J P.J. P.J. W w � I I I I CONC. SCREEN WALL "' � C) o W M U o cQ Z o ° Co co Lu I I I I z 16' 0" 13'-5" 16'-0" a 2'-2 1/2" w O 2-2 1/2 o %C\j 4'-7" 9'-0„ ,-5' 9'-01, -5" 9,-0,, 5'-3°L. w O P.J. z - --- I I I I P.J. w PROPOSED OFFICE AREA d C/)w LL W/OPTIONAL MEZZ w Z STRUCTURALSTEEL 2,000 SF+2,000 SF=4,000 SF i COLUMN. TYP. g - - - - - - - - - - Q o F.O.C. o �Q Q DOCK HIGH SECTIONAL VERTICAL r Q v OVERHEAD DOOR (9' 0"x 10' 0").TYP. cn zcn .. P.J. I I I I z 06 w O Z w WAREHOUSE c\j o O W O I I 10o I I w 7 28,946 SF W Z o CONCRETE SLAB. PROVIDE VAPOR RETARDER � I I OVER SAND BASE AT OFFICE AREA PER SOILS REPORT. PROVIDE SEALER FOR CONCRETE P.J. z V J LJ1 L J FLOOR AREA IN WAREHOUSE. J 4 A3.1 1 HOLLOW METAL 0 2 w W I I I I z w DOOR(3'-0"x T-0"). A3.1 1 Q P.J. SECTIONAL VERTICAL OVERHEAD op ~ z LLI Q J DOOR (12'-0"x 14'-0"). o I I I I N w L U w N LLJ C� Q LEGEND m N P.J. r, c� x PROPOSED FUTURE OFFICE AREALL 0l o P. o 0 CF.O.C. F.O.C. LL o z 0 WALL LEGEND Cr) Y w Q CONCRETE WALL m w C) z w 27'-8" 20'-0" 1 27'-0" 26'-0" 27'-01' 20'-8" 27'-0" 1 26'-0" 27'-0" 1 20'-0" 27'-8" J Q Q J 3 1 2 3 A311 4 5 6 m O O OVERALL SF = 32,940 SF w Q w O 0 c� w o z Q Q w O w w Q c PA/PM: J. STANARD z Q DRAWN BY.: H.A. /A.C. c� JOB NO.: IRV18-0165-00 c� w cn 0 SHEET g Q a_ z cn � U c� 3/32"=1 9. BUILDING 1 - FLOOR PLANA201 - 10 4' 8' 16' 24' 48' SCALE: 3/32° = 1'-0° w co oo w BUILDING 1Lo CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT NOTES a j Y �� Lu rL V) O w < a) z a)Q w O ro z � w - � w O z 0 w Z Q Z O O � 4 1 2 A3.1 2 3 4 5 z :7� 4— 228'-0' o m 56'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 56'-0" L z � o 185'-4" 42'-8" mol to 10 Q J 15'-11" 26'-0" 13'-5" I 26'-0" 26'-0" I 26'-0" 26'-0" 126'-0" L m 2'-10" 3'-0" 12'-0.1 3'-4" 4'-10" ci p o 10 F.O.0 o O A F.O.C. a F.O.0 0 HOLLOW METAL DOpR(3'-0"x T-0"). s SECTIONAL VERTIC.PL OVERHEAD DOOR(12'-0"x 14'-0"). v lulla Lo r. O ca Au q 00 TRUCKWELL m o > all all i\ J ¢ bA v —1 w N N I I n r c� Q L CONC. SCREEN WALL C P.J. I I I P.J. n cfl o Lo Q cn m C C o 00 cm I I N 14'-6" 13'-0" 14'-6" 2'-9" 2'-0" 2'-0" 2'-0" 4'-2" STRUCTURAL STEEL I d P.J. COLUMN. TYP. F.O.C. El DOCK HIGH SECTIONAL ERTICAL OVER w HEAD DOOR (9'�0"x 10'-0").TYP. w O o u '�^ N N V' ) I I J ^ Q zQ P.J. I I I P.J. 0 1 _ Ir 3 v Lo A3.1 2 � O 3 2 vJ^1�3z � I I P.J. WAREHOUSE -J o 100 N Q 35,000 SF I I U z ^ CONCRETE SLAB. PROVIDE VAPOR RETARDER 06 w OVER SAND BASE AT OFFICE AREA PER SOILS 0 Z REPORT. PROVIDE SEALER FOR CONCRETE I I P.J. N FLOOR AREA IN WAREHOUSE. O w O � wz � cn P.J. Z w N >- w Z w � Z z < PROPOSED OFFICE AREA W/OPTIONAL MEZZ. CV F.O.C. ui J N 2,000 SF+2,000 SF=4,000 SFN. - C w V OUTLINE OF CANOPY ABOVE q ALUMINUM STOREFRONT DOOR ifl 60 U o LEGEND P.J. WITH 1"INSULATED GLASS. d cm Lo N ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM C N � co w WITH 1"INSULATED GLASS.TYP. T co,vj N PROPOSED FUTURE OFFICE w AREA U c? r ¢� bo O w WALL LEGEND N o cm WALL N �, F.O.C. w w U bo c/) ;t Q r Y O N - .. = N Q D r0F.O.C.F.O.C. F.O.0 D Lu ` w c� 0 z °C J 0 I I 0 3'-8" 8'-3" 3'-6" 8'-3" 3'-0" 3'-0- 8'-3" 3'-6"L 8'-3" 3'-0"3'-0" 8'-3" 3'-6"L 8'-3" 3'-8" LL 2 EQ. SPACE . 2 EQ. SPACE . 2 EQ. SPACE . 2 EQ. SPACE . 2 EQ. SPACE . 2 EQ. SPACE . 26'-8" 26'-0" 26'-0" 26'-0" 26'-0" 26'-0" 18'-8" 26'-0" 26'-8" ol 0 z 2 1 2 A3.1 2 3 4 5 o w 0 2 OVERALL SF = 39,000 SF z PA/PM: J. STANARD DRAWN BY.: H.A. /A.C. JOB NO.: IRV18-0165-00 SHEET g w Y co jl U <, 3/32"=1'-0" BUILDING 2 - FLOOR PLANA2 - 2 cco) 0 4' 8' 16' 24' 48' SCALE: 3/32" = 1' 0" co '� BUILDING 2 CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 0 61-4 O w z f w O Co w � � w O z w O O � w 0 .V N 0 a)O ll� �4 w .c m c 0 O � � fU Q J w m Q w 0 w c� 0 z 1 1 2 3 A3.1 3 4 5 T 00 202' 0"ol N N o Ln 32' 0" 56' 0" 58'-0" 56'-0" m U °��° o u tz A u 00 170' 0" m Wo a, a, ol ca ¢ bA v w I I = 28'-0" 26'-0" 26'-0" 26'-0" 26'-0" 26'-0" 12'-0" ol 3'-0" 8'-3" L.3'-6" 8'-3" 3'-0" 8'-3" 3'-9" 3'-0" 12'-0" '-8"3'-0" 7'-4" 2 EQ. SPACE EQ. SPAC Q I I 1'-1 1/2" 6-0" 1'-1 1/2" 0 U U U n d o O O O ii ii 7 I I A F.O.C. F.O.C. A 1 q Cos HOLLOW METAL DOOR - o (3'-0"x T-0"). I I OUTLIN OF CANOPY ABOVE co � W � Z SECTIONAL VERTICAL DOOR ALUMINU STOREFRONT DOOR w % o (12'-0"x 14'-0"). WITH 1"INSULATED GLASS. % 0 0 w N `° I I co%en N ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM U WITH 1" INSULATED GLASS.TYP. M Q w co U) m o J _ w _O N CD 4 CONC. SCREEN WALL P.J. P.J. o A3.1 3 �z Lo /2 W O � M o I I A31 3 0 Q `'J PROPOSED OFFICE AREA W/OPT MEZZ z Lo 1,000 SF+ 1,000 SF=2,000 SF ���^^ N o I I o VJ �o j w N N Q z ^ 16'-8" 16'-0" 0n a 2'-5" 2'-5" I I STRUCTURAL STEEL COLUMN.TYP. 5' 3" 9'-0" 9'-0" 3'-11" O O lo / LL B — — — — — P.J. 0 P.J. q z O WAREHOUSE o LL 0 U)o I 100 I w z m 17,200 SF m J F.O.C. 5 w L z I I I C? J U CV J DOCK HIGH SECTIONAL VERTICAL N cn z o OVERHEAD DOOR(9'-0"x 10'-0").TYP. z 06 W LL Z P.J. CONCRETE SLAB. PROVIDE VAPOR RETARDER P.J. O W O OVER SAND BASE AT OFFICE AREA PER SOILS REPORT. PROVIDE SEALER FOR CONCRETE o z Lu z FLOOR AREA IN WAREHOUSE. I w o I I I J Z � w >- W N Co < Z W � I I I o„ Z z Q YP. a J C F.O.C. z w ui 0. o I I I o w Q LEGEND m I I I x PROPOSED FUTURE OFFICE AREA z m I I I 0 WALL LEGEND w ol 0 27'-8" 18'-0" 29'-0" 17'-2" 18'-4" 17'-2" 29'-0" 19'-0" 26'-8" 0 CONCRETE WALL z 0 0 w 3 Y 1 2 313 4 5 w m w 0 z z Q Q J o z 0 OVERALL SF = 19,200 SF 0 0 w LL Q w 0 0 o w z Q Q w O w w Q PA/PM: J. STANARD z Q DRAWN BY.: H.A. /A.C. 0 JOB NO.: IRV18-0165-00 0 w cn 0 SHEET Q Q � cn 0 3/32"=1 —o�� BUILDING 3 — FLOOR PLANA201 — 4' 8' 16' 24' 48' SCALE: 3/32" = 1 w o 3 o U w BULIDING 3 PENNINGTON INDUSTRIAL PARK CONCEPTUAL STORM DRAIN AND UTILITY PLAN �p �P Q�- � CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ��� 15 U G J N 2 'I o � ti � = i5o' /50' ^ � ' ° � I I I o o P � Q �o Q a o a+ +ti N Q ) ti ) p ° o L O � =W p =z �Z N N U 1 CU p = q q 0�G �P�� O,QN S Lou LLJ LLJ A W N v3j+ c,90 ., I J �`i 4�i ° a W 4�i O v� W -O - o m W c3i� N I ,� 1 p / 00 p W W 0 �-� TEMESCAL T \ �C I\ , 2 O �C >c >c k �C XLI CANYON F.C. S� " W W W \4i I I ti / I I_�� to to W 00 f W 4i to 4i 4i�SW W CHANNEL + ❑il zURE) (� � C❑HE) - - - E (q�fiE VICINITY MAP �� �� _ 0 4) �� � THOMAS BROS. PAGE 866 <sa - � ) c 8)-- /c s) � cs S8) 6- (ss) -A - c e (ss) (ss)- GRID D3 - S 4) CS5 ) C --- -- -- 5 )--- Li �, � � o 1276 76.5 TC -CW12) CW1 I a W\] W 0) W10 •AFO i �(W10)- 1 ° ' " ' ) = OWNER/DEVELOPER ENGINEER � - ° ° ° '-'-` ' '• • .3� PENNINGTON INDUSTRIAL LLC >�f c� 74.13 TC °_ 74:7 F • 72 SB&0 INC. �5.43 ''' '''''' G % TOLD CORPORATION MANAGER 73.46 F / ; i i: ;: ./;). 'o ,T� ;FL; � � 41689 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE, STE 126 FL F ° 5 621 VIA ALONDRA, SUITE 602 ,,° TEMECULA CA 92590 EX S E T I 72.67 73 46 io W ;° A ACCESS FL ' CAMARILLO CA 93012 ' 1 ti ?�6 ATTN. DON BROOKS N 1 FL Li= + ��418' 4.0% �'' ATTN. ROD OSHITAEX TELEPHONE POLE �' B GB ti2 2 �J PHONE. 310-939-7102 PHONE. 951-695-8900 I G 72.27 t` ���'� f� 76 0 + +ti TO BE RELOCATED ._ �` 76.9) „ \ FL •- ELEC TRANS PAD ?> 11 UNDERGROUND �; i + TC S 5. 73.80 TG EG � r ^ „ q _ 73.78 ,o I-) � F5 0 72.00 IE 73.80 PgP LEGAL DESCR/PTTON 0 o v a o l f W O��i4� a El .LP �+ N 1� ✓ _ a- a �,R� � ^�` \ OAS S APN: 377-160-014 I I 10 '� 1 Ni ' ' ciz��) 73..54 TG ° THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED LAKE ELSINORE, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, 70.29 IE W �� STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. 2.7 : ;°' 71.75 ��' 74 95 a `1276�� n o 8 ) FG I N +ti2 TC a N �� LOT 9 IN BLOCK 89 OF HEALDS RESUBDIWSION, IN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, COUNTY OF .9 2.0% + o / S NCE L/TY RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8, PAGE 378 OF MAPS, ' S ) ''''' �'' + SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDS ` 12 75. FF �21 73. o a 6/. 0 0 F ; ^ AN FOR cy� a ( �') 2 .; \ �c1276)� W 7 .84 + 71.63 L EXISTING EASEMENTS- R �� ca, ° D FS ,�1 PR 6,1 J - i r' 71.82 +ti2 •89 �' M �•°9 ' ' 6" HDPE r �1 Q THE EFFECT OF A DEED TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE FOR PUBLIC ROAD PURPOSES, o I PARKWAY DRAIN S=1.5 FS 289 LF v INCLUDING PUBLIC UTILITY AND PUBLIC SERVICE USES o 71.61 TC 70.94 FL ;1 ` FL,GB 18" HDPE l 7580 00.70% ° Z'J 115.00 FF 171 LF FS,GB y�j- ; RECORDED: JANUARY 26, 1979 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19172 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS o I ti2 4 ��74.96 FS 74.95 ®0.25% '; ;' o RE-RECORDED: DULY 2, 1979 AS INSTRUMENT N0. 137912 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS �, TC 7 . 0 g 6.3yg o Y o +ti co� I 7 � ti2 ° RE-RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 22, 1980 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 172553 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS o IEX G MH �� I t` AD ACCESS ti2 F GB �' I •��. �' �U o+ 3 ���I 1 I , c® 5 + W c 76 18 HDPE 4.7) SE ONC P A PR SWR POC "� °° ° .75• 40 LF EG o UTl PLAN n 0(� o D6.3�'> D �ELEC TRANS PAD ^ , ;�0.25% Y SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHYPR LS WTR SVC & MTR UTILITIEFG > ° S g. . ADDITI AL S PR DOM WTR SVC & MTR N R 5.30 TC`. 1.8 74.vz- fC ti Q INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC' SEWER & WATER: E UyERP 2 74.25 ^ h 4.E0 pS + :' a FLIGHT DATE: 11-01-18, CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1 FOOT 1. 6 TC PR FIRE DPT DCDA TC ;v_° 74.42 FL ❑❑ 76 " 6. 6 ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT EX EE1NLl T 74.90 FS 75.24 FS J °° 31315 CHANEY STREET r. gg _ 69.76 IE C 69.99 IE �„/ PROJECT INFORMATION LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 ., I �i ;;; ; 1. 6 0 5 7 R 7 .40 �. k - PHONE: (951) 674-3146 S H 0 0 74 2 7 4 74.57 RIM TC�• 1. GROSS AREA: 5.01 ACRES r u a �2� �°' TC MI 4. 1 69.86 IE / NET AREA:4.79 ACRES ELECTRIC: ti 1 i i / f + ^ 3 , I, o N v 73.38 N46°17'47"W �i TC 12 " T ` LOT SUMMARY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON f v FS GB 72.43 TG 2 12 HDPE vm W ' - 7 162.2 LF EA 73 ; ds h �' LOT 1: 74,915.00 SF, 1.72 AC 1351 E FRANCIS STREET 1%3EX EDGE 0 o� 72.95 300.66 12 72.30 70.06 IE r� 00 25% �`' "� � LOT 2. 87,376.52 SF, 2.01 AC (MAX) ONTARIO, CA 91761 d 4.8% FL H TG LP I LOT J. 46,346.78 SF, 1.06 AC (MIN) PHONE: (909)-930-8591 E CUR & Z �r - ��' } ti 71.18 7 E 7 C P°•" 74.59 FS P r TOTAL: 208,638.30 SF, 4.79 AC GAS: S' 7 ,7 73.2� � .• 74.01 FS 69.78 /E SEE RIGHT TC S B FTP �?i 69.65 IE SEX D /NL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY Z 69. 6 ti '4 72.87 TG 2. 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THREE INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS 155 S G STREET Q N 68. 9 -�83 73 57 73.12 _ �69.91 IE� 3 MANUFACTURINGPOSED ZONING: M1 LIMITED SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92410 2 c _ PR FIRE DPT DCDA ��cTp-�� cn C 1.8% I i i i pi I i i i i I t1[LOCK PHONE. (909) 335-7908 W PR DOM WTR SVC & MTR II 73.80 BUILDING SETBACKS: Z 3 80 FS. 24 0 PIPE X INLET 9.9 PR LS WTR SVC & MTR FS,GB • �° {; +ti2 IIII DETENTION FRONT YARD: 20' TELECOMMUNICATION: b ELEC TRANS PAD _ IIII10,385 CF TG 8" HDPE 12" SIDE YARD (ROW): 20' CROWN CASTLE io b 1 0 -PR SWR POC ,.'� _ LANDSCAPE SETBACKS: 2000 CORPORATE DR 00 a - - alllllllllllllll 2s LF �, _ 7�7 FS 72.61 TG 'n 73.89 FS �; 00.50% o ADJACENT TO STREET: MIN. 15; AVERAGE 20' CANONSBURB, PA 15317 co O -� o iIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �-� LANDSCAPE COVERAGE. 12% PHONE. (888) 632-0931 a 3 a EX C&G I ADA RAMP �1�j 69.62 IE 69.42 IE III P Z_ 4. EXISTING LAND USE. LIMITED INDUSTRIAL o o OFFSI TE LINEAR MODULAR o a 7,5? SJ� 1�7 00;uvc,R °, ;i: . 14+21.41 b I ^/ / III III w I Q 5. TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED: CHARTER SPECTRUM cv i I WETLANDS SYSTEM W �,� \ 1274. 00 `F I / ' '. �-�` r W OFFSITE: STREETS, STREET LIGHTS, STRIPING, CONNECTION 7337 CENTRAL AVE 3 BIOCLEAN (L-4-15-C) F I v �ti`O \1 68.20 IE MWS INLET \�1 +� V " - ' ; TO SEWER, WATER AND UTILITIES RIVERSIDE, CA 92504 i F ; :;; '; " ��g J 73 68 [8 HDPE ONSI T E DRAINAGE, SEWER, WATER, U PL1 TIES, GRADING PHONE: (951) 406-1645 rn 6" SCHEDULE 40 PVC °° ° °° 8 HDPE LOW FLOW TC No ; 40.7 LF 7 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION DATE. ??? o T 4 LF a . W 26.5 LF ® 0.5% 74.00 FF 00.50% '3 VFL ° 3, W N " 27" HDPE ' cn Z T 8- , 68.81 IE 8 HDPE LOW FLOW 73.96 F5V ^ I I EX CATCH BASIN � - I ,.R. .�r- _12.50 3631 LF 72.50 P ONSITE LINEAR MODULAR WETLANDS 72.8 TOP OF HEADWALL FL,�IP 00.25% L,HP 72.00 73.80 FS a 74.18 FS #.t3� �2� SYSTEM BIO-CLEAN (L-8-24-V) 68.40 IE 24" HDPE - TG,LP 69.31 IE T 69.54 IE 20+61.27 PROPERTY LINE - Z 68IBI .35 UPPER BAY 72.00 TG 72.00 TG �2� 72.00 TG 3.98� I 74 j / I A Y lc> �' `" - 68.95 IE c12� 69.15 /E LE�4 69.35 IE� ° 7 • L f� F o 71.8 TOP WEIR EG - / T ) 7.I Q �_ ^ �-� 72.8 TOP OF E I'v SEE ON EP AL SD b I °f° - ] E15 Tl c T) CHANNEL_ WALLS LIT P4AAL F _ - - J EX FAD Z ., DDI ONAiL SD INFO -� 67.70 IE MWS OUTLET -�- ° + O Q . . . . ° io-E Ico " P VC �� 14 '7.6 LOWER BAY 1A Fos � EX VCP S �, o 6" of -PARKWAY DRAIN S=6.0 o ° Q Z EX ELEC co j (6 Z 98 TC)(6 Z 22 FL) CONCEPTUAL STORM SHEET N0. SEE LEFT BENCH MARK I� ? DRAIN AND UTILITY PLAN DESIGNATION: EL-35-80 PLANNING ,�GINEERING SURVEYING O' DESCRIPTION: DESCRIBED BY RIVERSIDE COUNTY FROM THE INTERSECTION OF 41689 Enterprise Circle North, Suite 126 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND LAKESHORE DRIVE SE 1.2 MI. ALONG Temecula, 9 92590 GRAPHIC SCALE LAKESHORE DRIVE TO ADDRESS #17887 LAKESHORE DRIVE, 50'f NW 951-695-89011 FaxOF OF DRIVE ABOVE7'f W OF PP 3�2`1 SIN+T463490F CENTER LINE OF LAKESHORE 1't S OF SURVEY MARKER POST. SCALE: 1"=40. FOR TPM 37710 FILE N0. MARK DATE INITIAL DESCRIPTION REC APPR DATE s . . . rrV FOR 40 0 40 80 120 ELEVATION: 1264.84 ' DATE: 71,712019 FOR: PENNINGTON INDUSTRIAL LLC REVISION W . MINTHORN STREET LEGEND — - 0 NATURAL COLOR CONCRETE PAVING WITH MEDIUM \\ BROOM FINISH. — — p p — —� — O • O © 3/4 " CRUSH AGGREGATE GRAVEL © ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP WITH TRUNCATED DOME PAVERS O o O O O O 0 o / I O ENTRY FOCAL PALMS o I o o © PARKING LOT • I o o 0TRASH ENCLOSURE O o * I + o o O NATURAL COLORED CONCRETE PAVING WITH I SAWCUT JOINTS AT BUILDING ENTRIES I ® O O I O O } 0 NATURAL COLOR CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE RAMP TO ok I O o BUILDING ENTRIES O o • O o BLDG 2 © BLDG 3 I I o o PROPOSED PLANT LEGEND o o SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE/ WUCOLS in SPACING O O TREES O o • ! o o O ACACIA SHOESTRING 15 GAL/ LOW STENOPHYLLA ACACIA STD + o 0 I o 0 r 7 O o GEIJERA AUSTRALIAN 24" BOX/ • L J o O + LOW PARVIFLORA WILLOW STD. I I � Lo 0 PHOENIX 24" BTH + O O MEDJOOL DATE DIAMOND DACTYLIFERA PALM CUT LOW o o 'MEDJOOL' TRUNK SHRU 0 0 5 GAL. / \ / ALOE STRIATA CORAL ALOE 48" O.C. LOW O O BACCHARIS P. DWARF COYOTE 1 GAL. / X o o 'TWIN PEAKS' BRUSH 48" O.C. LOW BOUGAINVILLEA 1 GAL. / / \ 'LA JOLLA' BOUGAINVILLEA 48" O.C. LOW CALLI STEM ON 'LITTLE DWARF 1 GAL. / JOHN BOTTLEBRUSH 48 O.C. LOW \ F-1 F-1 1 GAL. / uiL J L J � FESTUCA MAIREI ATLAS FESCUE 36" O.C. MOD MUHLENBERGIA 1 GAL. / ui BULL GRASS LOW • EMERSLEYI 'EL TORO' 60 O.C. MYOPORUM PINK FLAT/ PARVIFOLIUM RACER RALIAN 12" O.C. LOW RACE WESTRINGIA MUNDI COAST 5 GAL. / + FRUTICOSA'MUNDI' ROSEMARY 60" O.C. LOW U) ® ® VINE FICUS PUMILA CREPPING FIG PER PLAN LOW ui 0< 0 0 Z I I Q U O o O e O O I O O o I I I I X BLDG 1L--j F� I I LJ 0 I of ° I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I -7� 7� 0 10 20 40 60 scheme: 12. 1 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN 8841 RESEARCH DR Lake Elsinore Property IRV18-0165-00 SHEET SUITE 200 SWC Chaney and Minthorn Street, Lake Elsinore, CA WARE COMB 07.11.2019 Ll . . . IRVINE • CA 92618 949.387.1323 RIDGELA.COM W � /II r1 � n CCT. „ � ITN J �TAL. � / O \ _ PROPOSED PLANT LEGEND / BOU AR �P. PAR \ —AC MYO BOU — WEV PAR MYO L.J \ — SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE/ WUCOLS SPACING TREES ACACIA SHOESTRING 15 GAL / O 0 O O O • • • STENOPHYLLA ACACIA STD + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + BOU + GEIJERA AUSTRALIAN 24" BOX/ BO + o o ALO LJ + \ PARVIFLORA WILLOW STD. LOW o o STR + /I o 0 PHOENIX 24" BTH DACTYLIFERA MEDJOOL DATE DIAMOND LOW PALM CUT I CAL WES / \ I 'MEDJOOL' TRUNK 'MYO L.J. FEU PAR � I SHRUBS ALOE STRIATA CORAL ALOE 48" O.C. LOW BACCHARIS P. DWARF COYOTE 1 GAL. / I TWIN PEAKS BRUSH 48" O.C. LOW I ® I BOUGAINVILLEA 1 GAL. / BOUGAINVILLEA 48" O.C. LOW BAC 'LA JOLLA' T.P. FES I CALLISTEMON 'LITTLE DWARF 1 GAL. / LOW / \ MA/ JOHN' BOTTLEBRUSH 48" O.C. I GAL. / FESTUCA MAIREI ATLAS FESCUE 1 1 O.C. MOD 36"I MUHLENBERGIA BULL GRASS 1 GAL. / LOW G 2 BLDG 3 EMERSLEYI 'EL TORO' 60" O.C. I MYOPORUM PINK FLAT/ I PARVIFOLIUM AUSTRALIAN RACER 12" O.C.WESTRING LOW 5 GAL. I O FRUTICOSAI MUNDI' ROSEMARY ST 60" O.C. LOW I \ VINE FICUS PUMILA CREPPING FIG PER PAN LOW I I MYO PAR CAL L J I I L.J. L—� FES MAI I I — I F/C PUM IALO \ / CAL STR \ I L.J. I I II CAL BOU x v o L.J. 00 00 L.J I O / \ ® o ALO MUH I / \ STR E.T. IES FEU CAL L.J. LJLJ LAJ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + U I F/C PUM Lij r FES I MA/ ry I I FES BOU MAI I 1 L.J \ CAL I I L.J. I ® ® FES o a F-°- MAI + o WES J \ FEU I 0 0 ALO STR + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + CAL BOU L.J O• \ / + + / \ IMYO MYO \ + PAR I. PAR + —I— + MYO /\\ + PAR / + BLDG 1 r� �� L- wEs + -j r 7 FEU + L J I \ / V + CAL \1 + L.J. MYO CAL + 1 PAR L.J. MYO \ + PAR O 1 + 0 10 20 40 60 scheme: 12. 1 COLOR CODED PLANTING PLAN 8841 RESEARCH DR Lake Elsinore Property IRV18-0165-00 SHEET SUITE 200 SWC Chaney and Minthorn Street, Lake Elsinore, CA W"E OMB 07.11.2019 L2 . 1 . . IRVINE • CA 92618 949.387.1323 RIDGELA.COM z--.-� f byy V I / �..il n f� rr � i.•r / - I 7/•N _- �/•w :{` ,V -. ` �f.wY °0.�-r �-_ `� Y it � r� - . �! ,✓h ecs Jar}. Jy} �F 1+��.#� ,. °�( •+: .�- !4 I � Imo.. �� r J r I),� •I�,�� I�s-l�r` 5 - _ 'tip- ' x 'Fd� •' + k w� - .. .. �- ' i+ -:•.y �.;-%. �' �-.1.. 'a� r,�.t ��#y�� C '� '�; pf'_ r s:•� - ,� •_ ',,. Zi i.t~.,ti-•.: .; 1 r., �'lr�,, ,�Y4dk sryc,::AF � tea'• I r ra Is ., � ti x 'ia :. 1.. .. .:.., i. yo'q. �- X.; '` � �i FLr •,. _ .a .. -_ - -. =1 �' ���. .. - yr, •�' ¢ w2 4 y W ftm ism 04. —10 - -f I_ __ r3 i>f�.}�+' 9r t�-,. ,.� .•r � � .'�. � m.r. sr �T�, I ':A : illa' 4 1 z = -� -I -� 'ti• � 1 s - � yp 12 :� .•� ri Y -'_ o � •� 'h - �` - .vt, �fi,h"£' •4rr,:�„ z . ���C „}� L l ,>,.: :i r. �li _ _ •11 ,i•r.� �+ �.1" -�T _ 'Y l w�" �f '.c:•. � '. a�}}�'� �`,T 1, `"r...t,..,\' �y' .w -�r � f -t .-r•- 'fir I. .�I 4. x ••1 f 4-, f. �-../'m�A'•,�' 1:_ ,a 'r � - 5 *Y_. -- - 'i• � _ •i � !�' 'h. 1. f,., t"',c. TR• .1W�'� •"� -f , - � U: }� 'd r f - .- � i �• r � - _'Y .may`.: , iC,yi.:.w r bb :'"•�?` s�;--�. x J~'r trTM..,. .`,. >i,.` I r r.9 ?.�- r:(• �i �'"i _ �.. i� - - ./ Y _".f � ,_ t �,• e;r�J.fir. •�.`:,'S'"':F `yr' ti b � ;'�y � ,F �. - ��•iy / �'�L 7►`` '1 `.`A)11�.�•�rr y' k. +f6.AWf Yi '{ a .� ..`p _ f _ - ,� •.7P • • : • 1 1 1 • . . • Y - 1w '.k'r,- .r �S#', _ _-s '.' ?. i- `�=�+L.' `' ., '✓K:_ F.. t. , `!;.> - .� - ': r .. •a` - r- PT- i ,. ter•:, .L { .;N - 111111 2 .}�1,P -J 4_ 1� 1 x p • I,' �Y. ail n{ h' �,-, +�_#Mrp [ •ri14`. "rry .. _ � `Y�• :Y'.. •r ,I.%,j it �.. Y ate- '.i .,, -'� .�, �' _ ,�• •a-r- .. . �,t J !,� N :F 1 J 'Wr Ah AT i - 4 ; r '•e,:ti _ti ;i _ f" ' x- .. if -". 'If� r `� 1,: 1:., r -r .. ;:r I " _ r�; ';.k'"r.- flr. �"• 1 ' k"�. ,+ '. ai~ 'a�• '+'-,fir - - t�� +- -'d e Q • rL a1 r + _ .� hi. K{_ -.r��•�' -r. --.,� •'S 4 .S .T • . � _ ?�.�, ids nl"'V, f"r ,1 T I. r .r fl : I v r M1 �� u y ••• i !r - r r _ T - � a��., ._ ; - r� �T,+,�+.• 1 Z ?. 1._ �.. it E (' 'L ..�'' I ,.': .. .� .. _ ..,. ... .M.: _. k& ( 5'�•?t+•. '� I I *Ae e 4 �- i. 4 b 4 - .s• '.r.• r 4 - - E f ur R �y r�}T -•{r 9 1 I J r 1 rR ill I 4., a r A ' f .aka_ tiw . ' � .". .�,. •. - iT, r .� •. .. ..�' -�,� r _ �..• r' S_. f �\ JR: R R Y^ :^7 a+E• Z' r �e , 1 • , - ty rA y ti,Z- 'l: •f .. -. l �"' ,� I /� � _ 1'. Syr' � �h.-' S! '.Qa. � ��� • , � • 1 • 11 • 10 14 1 • I I wbxtR7wnum-1 • 1 1 • x 1 ! 1