The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPC Reso No 2017-89 (ARI Chaney, LLC, IDR)RESOLUTTON NO.2017-89 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA" APPROVE INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2017.01 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIX INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED AT APN: 377-140-027 Whereas, ARI Chaney, LLC, has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore (City) requesting approval of Planning Application No.2017-17 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 37337 and lndustrial Design Review No. 201 7-01 ) to subdivide 5.1 't acres into seven (7) parcels ranging in size from 0.46 acres to 1 .1 0 acres and to develop six (6) industrial buildings rangang in size from 8,154 sq. ft. to 18,41"1 sq. ft. (70,705 sq. ft. total) along with 209 parking spaces and related improvements on the same property (Project). The Project is located on the northwesterly side of Chaney Street and southwesterly of Minthorn Street, at the southerly end of Birch Street (APN: 377 -1 40-027) (APN: 377-1 40-027); and, Whereas, pursuant to Chapter '1 7.'184 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the Planning Commission (Commission) has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council (Council) pertaining to design reviews; and, Whereas, on November 7, 2017 ata duly noticed Public Hearing the Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING GOMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Commission has reviewed and analyzed the proposed Project pursuant to the California Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code SS 59000 et seq.), the Lake Elsinore General Plan (GP), and the LEMC and finds and determines that the proposed Project is consistent with the requirements of California Planning and Zoning Law and with the goals and policies of the GP, and the LEMC Section 2: The Commission finds and determines that and no new environmental documentation is necessary because all potentially significant effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). All potentially significant impacts have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to the earlier MND and none of the conditions described in Section 15"162 exist. MND No. 2007-05 (SCH# 2007071 157) was adopted in 2007 tor the Fairway Business Park project that evaluated environmental impacts that would result from the complete build-out of the FaiMay Business Park project. No substantial changes that require major revisions to the MND exist and no new information of substantial importance that require revisions to the earlier MND exist. Section 3: That in accordance with Chapter 17.184 of the LEMC, the Commission makes the following findings regarding lndustrial Design Review No. 2017-01: '1. The Project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the GP, Specific Plan and the Zoning District in which the Project is located. PC Reso. No.2017-89 Page 2 of 3 The Proiect complies with the goals and objectives of the GP because it witt assist inachieving the development of a welt-balanced and functional mix of residentiat, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational, and institutionalland uses. The project will serve to diversry and expand Lake Elsinore's economic base. 2. The Pdect complies with the design directives contained in the GP and all other applicable provisions of the LEMC. The Proiect is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments and is a continuationof a continuation of a previously approved industriat park. Sufficient setbacks and enhanced onsite landscaping have been provided thereby creating interest and varying visfas as a person moves along abufting streets and within the park. The proleci witt complement the quality of existing development and wilt create a visuatly pleasing, non- detractive relationship between the proposed development and existing projects throughthe use of a 'Contemporary' architecturat design that is similar to -exis[ing industrjat developments in the vicinity. ln addition, safe and efficient circutation has been achieved onsife. 3. conditions and safeguards pursuant to chapter 1l.g2.o7o of the Zoning code, including guaranlees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the Project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 1 7.82. Pursuant to Secflon 17.184.070 of the LEM}, the project was considered by the commission at a duly noticed public Hearing held on November 7, 2017. The project, as reviewed and conditioned by all applicabte city divisions, depaftments and agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment. Approvat of the Project will-not result ina substantial change to the previously adopted supptemental Eivironmentat lmpact Repoft. Therefore, no additional environmental review is necessary. $ection,4: Based uponall of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions ofApproval imposed upon the Project, the commission hereby recommends that the council approve lndustrial Design Review No. 2017-01. Section 5: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Passed and Adopted on this 7th day of November, 2O1T , by the following vote. PC Reso. No. 2017-89 Page 3 of 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) ) ss. ) l, Justin Kirk, Principar pranner of rhe city of Lake Ersinore,. carifornia, hereby certify thatResolution No. 2017-89 was adopted ov tnJ pLnning- c-oirmission of the city of Lake Ersinore, fiXfS,il$;.6t,i"[igurar meetins t,eta oi r.rovemo;; ;: ;;i;, and that tne "a,rie-*aJ'a-oipteo by AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: commissioner's Armit, carro, and Kraarenbeek; Vice-chair Ross and chairman Gray None None Ju'stin