HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Reso No 2016-63 (IDR 2016-01, MDR, MSHCP)RESOLUTION NO.2016-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, CAL!FORNIA, F!NDING THAT INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO.
2016-01 (MTNOR DESIGN REVTEW) rS CONSTSTENT W|TH THE WESTERN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN
(MSHcP)
Whereas, Joe Schallert, Schallert Enterprises requests approval for the addition of a 2,100
Square Foot (SF)canopy shade structure to an existing industrial building (Project). The proposed
Project is specifically located at 553 Birch Street and is generally located northerly of Birch Street
and westerly of Minthorn Street. (APN: 377-430-048); and,
Whereas, Section 6.0 of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation
Plan (MSHCP) requires that all discretionary Projects within an MSHCP criteria cell undergo the
Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process (LEAP) and Joint Project Review (JPR) to analyze the scope
of the proposed development and establish a building envelope that is consistent with the MSHCP
criteria; and,
Whereas, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP further requires that the City of Lake Elsinore (City) adopt
consistency findings demonstrating that the proposed discretionary entitlement complies with the
MSHCP cell criteria, and the MSHCP goals and objectives; and,
Whereas, pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Chapter 17.184 (Design Review)
the Planning Commission of the City has been delegated with the responsibility of reviewing and
approving, conditionally approving, or denying to the lndustrial Design Review (lDR); and,
Whereas, on August 16,2016, at a duly noticed Public Hearing the Planning Commission has
considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested
parties with respect to this item.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Project and its consistency with the
MSHCP prior to recommending that the City Council adopt Findings of Consistency with the
MSHCP
Section 2. That in accordance with the MSHCP, the Planning Commission makes the following
findings for MSHCP consistency:
1. The Project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City must make
an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval.
Pursuant to the Crty's MSHCP Resolution, the Project is required to be reviewed for
MSHCP consistency, including consistency with other Plan Wide Requirements.
The Proiecf site is not located within a MSHCP Criteria Cell. Based upon the site
reconnaissance survey there are noissues regarding consistency with the MSCHP's
other Plan Wide Requirements. The only requirements potentially applicable to the
Project were the Protection of Species Associa/ed with Riparian/Riverine Areas ancl
Vernal Pool Guidelrnes (Secf ion 6.1.2 of the MSHCP) and payment of the MSHCP
Local Development Mitigation Fee (Section 4 of the MSHCP Ordinance). The
t
Reso No. 2016-63
Page 2 of 3
Project sffe ls located in a previously developed site, and has no habitat, including
riparian/riverine areas or vernal pools, present on site.
2. The Project is subject to the City's LEAP and the Western Riverside County Regional
Conservation Authority's (RCA) JPR processes.
As sfated above, the Project is nof located within a Criteria Cell and therefore the
Project was not processed through the City's LEAP and a JPR.
3. The Project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools
Guidelines.
The Projecl consisfs of adding a canopy shade structure to an existing industrial
building on a fully developed site. As such, the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal
Pool Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP are not applicable.
The Project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species
Guidelines.
The site does not fall within any Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Areas.
Neither a habitat assessment nor fufther focused surveys are required for the
Project. Therefore, Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines as sef
forth in Sec/ion 6.1.3 of the MSHCP are not applicable to the Project.
The Project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures.
The MSHCP only requires additional surveys for ceftain species if the Project is
located in Criteria Area Species Survey Areas, Amphibian Species Survey Areas,
Burrowing Owl Survey Areas, and Mammal Species Survey Areas of the MSHCP.
The Projecl sife is not located within any of the Critical Species Survey Areas.
Therefore, the provisions of MSCHP Section 6.3.2 are not applicable.
The Project is consistent with the UrbanA/Uildlands lnterface Guidelines.
The Projecf site is not within or adjacent to any MSHCP criteria or conservation
areas. Therefore, the UrbanUVildlands lnterface Guidelines of MSHCP Section 6.1.4
are not applicable.
The Project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
The Projecf conslsfs of adding a canopy shade structure to an existing industrial
building on a fully developed site. There are no resources located on the Project site
requiring mapping as sef forth in MSCHP Section 6.3.1.
The Project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines.
The Projecf srte is not within or adjacent to any MSHCP criteria or conservation
areas. Therefore, the Fuels Management Guidelines of MSHCP Section 6.4 are not
applicable.
6
[-
I
7
Reso No. 2016-63
Page 3 of 3
9. The Project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development
Mitagation Fee.
The Prqect conslsls of adding a canopy shade structure to an existing industrial
building on a fully developed site.
10. The Project is consistent with the MSHCP.
The Project conslsls of adding a canopy shade structure to an existing industrial
building on a fully developed stte. As described above, the Prqect complies with all
appl icati on M S HC P req u ire m ents.
Section 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the Conditions of
Approval imposed upon the Project, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
Council find that the Project is consistent with the MSHCP.
Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
Passed and Adopted at a Regular meeting of the Planning Commission this 16th day of August,
2016. by the following vote.
Armit, Chairman
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
l, Justin Kirk, Princrpal Planner of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 2016-63 was adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Eistnore,
California, at the Regular meeting of August 16, 2016, and that the same was adopted by the
following vote:
AYES: Commissioner's Jordan, Ross and Carroll. Vice-Chair Gray, and Chairman Armit
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT. None
)"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
RESOLUTIONS:
PROJECT:
PROJECT NAME:
2016-XX & 2016-XX
tDR 2016-01
Schallert Canopy Addition
PROJECTLOCATION: APN:377-430-048
APPROVAL DATE: August 16,2016
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 31,2016
EXPIRATION DATE: August 16,2018
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. The proposed project is a request by Joe Schallert, Schallert Enterprises for the
approval of lndustrial Design Review No. 2016-0'1 (Minor Design Review) for the
addition of a2,100 Square Foot (SF) canopy shade structure to an existing industrial
building ("Project"). The proposed Project is specifically located at 553 Birch Street
and is generally located northerly of Birch Street and westerly of Minthorn Street.
(APN: 377-430-048).
2. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold
harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim,
action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees or Agents to
attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencres, appeal
boards, or legislative body concerning the project (lDR No. 2016-01)
3. Within 30 days of project approval, the applicant shall sign and complete an
"Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the
Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records.
PLANNING DIVISION
4. lndustrial Design Review No. 2016-01 shall lapse and become void two years
following the date on which the design review became effective, unless one of the
followihg: (1) prior to the expiration of two years, a building permit related to the
design review is issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward
completion; or (2) prior to the expiration of two years, the applicant has applied for
and has been granted an extension of the design review approval pursuant to
subsections (B) and (C) of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Section
17.184J20. Notwithstanding conditions to the contrary, a design review granted
pursuant to LEMC Chapter 17.184 shall run with the land for this two-year period,
subject to any approved extensions, and shall continue to be valid upon a change of
ownership of the site which was the subject of the design review application.
5. All Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on page one of building plans prior
to their acceptance by the Building and Safety Division, Community Development
Alrplica;rl<inrtral.- __Page 1 of 4
tDR 2016-01
Cond itions of Approval
PC:0811612016
CC: TBD
Department. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities.
All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved building
plans, as modified by these conditrons of approval.
Any proposed minor revisions to approved plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Communrty Development Director or designee. Any proposed substantial
revisions to the approved plans shall be reviewed according to the provisions of the
Municipal Code in a similar manner as a new application. Grading plan revisions
shall be reviewed by the City Engineer.
A detailed on-site lighting plan, includrng a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed
to ensure that all exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site so as
not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets or allow illumination above
the horizontal plane of the fixture.
Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation
and construction activity. The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the
entrance to the project site identifying the approved days and hours of construction
activity 7:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Only finish work and similar
interior construction may be conducted on Saturdays and may commence no earlier
than B:00 a.m. and shall cease no later than 4:00 p.m. with no construction activity
to occur on Sundays or legal holidays. The sign shall identify the name and phone
number of the development manager to address any complaints.
The proposed location of on-site construction trailers shall be approved by the
Community Development Director or designee. A cash bond of $1,000 shall be
required for any construction trailers placed on the site and used during construction.
Bonds will be released after removal of trailers and restoration of the site to an
acceptable state, subject to approval of the Community Development Director or
designee. Such traile(s) shall be fully on private property and outside the public
right of way.
Graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours.
The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event
shall trash and debns remain for more than 24 hours.
lnstall, operate and maintain full capture systems for all storm drains that captures
runoff from the facility or site.
lf any of the conditions of approval set forth herein fail to occur, or if they are, by their
terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to
be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the
6.
7.
B.
o
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Applicanls lnitials Page 2 of 4
tDR 2016-01
Conditions of Approval
PC: 08/1612016
CC: TBD
right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition
issuance of all future building permits, deny, revoke, or further condition all
certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted;
record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation.
BUILDING DIVISION
15. The Applicant is to meet all applicable Building Codes in effect at the time, including
requirements for the occupancy.
16. Any internal or external modifications to the building shall require a building permit.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
17. The applicant/operator shall comply with all requirements of the Riverside County
Fire Department.
Appiicants lnitials Page 3 of 4
tDR 2016-01
Conditions of Approval
PC: 08/1612016
CC: TBD
I hereby state that I acknowledge receipt of the approved Conditions of Approval for the
above named project and do hereby agree to accept and abide by all Conditions of
Approval as approved by the City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission on August 16,
2016.1 also acknowledge that all Conditions shall be met as indicated.
Date:
Applicant's Signature:
Print Name:
Address.
Phone Number.
Applicants lnitials Page 4 of 4