HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Reso No 2016-33 (Airstream Dealership-CDR 2016-03 MSHCP)RESOLUTION NO. 2016.33
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPT FINDINGS THAT
COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2016-03 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT
coNSERVAT|ON PLAN (MSHCP)
WHEREAS, Dan Hinson HCD Architects requests approval of a proposed 6,120
square foot RV sales office and related improvements for a new Airstream dealership on
a 266,287 SF lot. The proposed project is specifically located at 18870 camino Del Norte
(APN: 377-1 10-045), and is generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection
of Camino Del Norte and O'Hana Circle; and
WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that all discretionary projects
within an MSHCP criteria cell undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition process ("LEAP )
and Joint Project Review ("JPR") to analyze the scope of the proposed development and
establish a building envelope that is consistent with the MSHCp criteria; and
WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP further requires that the City of Lake
Elsinore adopt consistency findings demonstrating that the proposed discretionary
entitlement complies with the MSCHP cell criteria, and the MSCHP goals and objectives;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Chapter 17.184
(Design Review) the Planning commission has been delegated with the responsibility of
making recommendations to the City Council pertainrng to the residential design review;
and
WHEREAS, on April 19, 2016, at a duly noticed public hearing the planning
Commission has consrdered evidence presented by the Community Development
Department and other interested parties with respect to this item.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the project and its
consistency with the MSHCP prior to recommending that the city council adopt Findings
of Consistency with the MSHCP.
SEGTION 2. That in accordance with the MSHCP, the Planning Commission
makes the following findings for MSHCP consistency:
1. The Project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City
must make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval.
Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Resolution, the Project is required to be
'seurleplnc acelalul spuelpll^y'i/ueql n aqt Llll/v\ luolslsuoc sl lco[o.]d eq1 I
'elqealdde
lou e z e g uolcos dHcsl^ Jo suotst^ud aql 'dolereqt se v ieNns
so/cads pctluc aqllo iue uql/A palecol lou s als lcalold aql dcHsw aql
Jo seelv ioNns so/cods Pwwew pue 'seeJv ie^rns l/Ao 6ut/1^d)ng 'seolv
r(arung sarcadg uelqltldtuy 'seety lerung satcedg e V eualuC u pelecol st
pelot4 eqly seoeds weyec rc1 slentns puoryppe saLrnbet lluo dCHSW eq-L
'seJnpacord pue speaN [anrng geuorllppv aLl] tll!/v1 ]ua]stsuoc st lcelot6 aq1 g
ycefot4 eq1 o1 elqealdde Jou ue dCHSW ot.t] lo e L 9 uortcas u qUoJ las se
sowppme sarcedg lueld ctwapuj /Au)eN Jo uotlcalud ' olueql 'pe[o4
eq1 rc1 petnbu a.te s,{euns pesnooJ reqqnJ Jou Jueussasse J e qeLl e JoqyoN
'seety larung senedg ye14 ctwepuj
^
u)eN lue wLqrn p11ou soop olls aqf
'saurleprnC sarcadg
lueld crLuapuf
^
oleN lo uorlcalord eql q]l/v\ ]ualsrsuoc sr lcalor6 aq1 ,
'elqealdde pu ere dCHSW eLl lo Z L g uo1oas
u! tlltol Jas se saulap lne pod pueA pue se V euuaNA/ueuedry aq1
'qens sy als aql uo JSxe socJnosat cnenbe rcq1o n pyqeq dwuqs furcy1ood
puJeA 'euueNJ 'ueuedu ou pql pepoAet leuns ecuesseuuocoJ olls eql
'saurlaprnc
slood leuJan pue searv auuenrgTueuedlu eql Llllm lualsrsuoc sr 1ca[or6 aq1 €
'/ et\aH
pafol4 1uto7 e pue dV31 s,A1p aq1 qbnoLql pessecotd lou set pafo4 eq1
uoJeraql pue eC eyelpC e u!ql!^ pelecol lou st lcalo4 eq1 'e^oqe palels sV
'sessecord marneg 1ca[or6 lulol (VCU) s,,(1rroq1ny uor]eruasuoC leuor6ag
[uno3 eprsranru uralsaM aql pue dvjl s,^]lC eLll o] ]calqns sr lcalor6 aqg Z
's1ood puten Jo seele euuetulueuedu 1utprycu 'e1rs uo yasad pyqeq
ou seLl pue 'leuaeLl gl. optsJolul eq1 o1 yecefpe pe]ecq t seq elrs pefot4
aql '@cueupto dCHSW eql Jo t uouces) ee1 uonebulAl yewdoleae1 pcol
dCHSW aq1 p yawled pue (dCHSW eLfi lo Z L'9 uonceg) souuapne pod
puaA pue se V euueNA/uepedlA qllu peielcossy sercedg Jo uoncoloJd
eLlJ arct pafog aq1 o1 elqeuldde l11e4ue7od syuewetnbu lpo eq1
,,'syuewattnba4 aptA uetd,, reqlo s,dHCSW aql ql!/A icuelstsuoc 5urp.tebat
sonss/ ou arc ateql iauns acuesspuuocal a s aql uodn peseg 'ileC eUelUC
dcHsw e u!ql!/u polecol jou s/ sa// elrs peloL4 aql ,, sJuewatnbeY aptl4
uetd,, rcqlo t11tr,t icuelsrsuoc 5wprycu 'ficuelsrsuoc dCHSn )o] pe/AeAa)
, JO Z 30Vd
0e-9 l0z'ON NOlln-IOS3U NOlssll,llt lOC gNl NNV-'ld
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2016-33
PAGE 3 OF 4
The Project sife ls nol within or adjacent to any MSHCP criteria or
conservation areas. Therefore, the UrbantWildlands lnterface Guidelines of
MSHCP Secflon 6.1 .4 are not applicable.
7. The Project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
There are no resources located on the Project site requiring mapping as set
forth in MSCHP Section 6.3.1.
8. The Project is consrstent with the Fuels Management Guidelines.
The Project slle is nof within or adjacent to any MSHCP criteria or
conservation areas. Therefore, the Fuels Management Guidelines of MSHCP
Seciion 6.4 are not applicable.
9. The Project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development
Mitigation Fee.
As a condition of approval, the Project will be required to pay the City's
MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee at the time of issuance of building
permits.
10. The Project is consistent with the MSHCP.
SECTION 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and
the conditions of approval imposed upon the Project, the Planning Commission hereby
recommends that the City Council find that the Project is consistent with the MSHCP.
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1gth day of April 2016, by the
following vote:
\
Shelly Jordan, Ch n
City of Lake re Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Justin Ki
Principal
PLANNING COMMISSION
PAGE 4 OF 4
RESOLUTION NO. 2016.33
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
l, Justin Kirk, Principal Planner of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby
certify that Resolution No. 20'16-33 as adopted by the Planning commission of the city
of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of April 2016 and that the same
was adopted by the following vote:
)"
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
CHAIRMAN JORDAN, VICE CHAIR ARMIT, COMMISSIONER GRAY
COMMISSIONER RAY
NONE
NONE
NONE