HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Reso No 2015-37 (GPA 2015-03)RESOLUTION NO.2015-37
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVE GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2014.03, AN AMENDMENT TO THE
CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN
TO 1) REDESTGNATE SPRTNG STREET BETWEEN COLLTER AVENUE
AND FLINT STREET FROM SECONDARY TO COLLECTOR ON
FIGURE 2.3 ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS, AND IN TABLE HD-T2
ROADWAY PLAN AND BIKEWAY PLAN-HISTORIC DISTRICT; AND 2)
REMOVE DIAMOND GIRCLE AND REPLACE IT WITH THE EXISTING
PETE LEHR DRIVE AND ITS EXTENSION TO MALAGA ROAD, ON
FIGURE 2.3 ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION.
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore adopted its General Plan on December 13,
2011, and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65358 empowers the legislative body to
amend all or part of an adopted general plan if to do so would be in the public interest
and so long as no mandatory element of the general plan is amended more frequently
than four times during any calendar year; and
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2014-03 (the "project") is part of the
City's First (1st) cycle amendments to the Lake Elsinore General Plan for the 2015
calendar year; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res.
Code$$21000etseq.: "CEQA") andtheStateGuidelinesforlmplementationofCEQA
(14 C.C.R. SS 15000 et seg.: "CEQA Guidelines"), public agencies are expressly
encouraged to reduce delay and paperwork associated with the implementation of
CEQA by using previously prepared environmental documents when those previously
prepared documents adequately address the potential impacts of the proposed project
(CEQA Guidelines Section 15006); and
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes the standard to be
used when determining whether subsequent environmental documentation is necessary
and says that when an environmental document has already been adopted for a pro.ject,
no subsequent environmental documentation is needed for subsequent entitlements
which comprise the whole of the action unless substantial changes or new information
are presented by the project; and
WHEREAS, the City certified a Recirculated Program Environmental lmpact
Report (RP-EIR) for the update to the City's General Plan in December 2011. lncluded
in the RP-EIR was the analysis and determination of environmental impacts from the
adoption of the Downtown Master Plan. The project remains consistent and implements
the development anticipated by the RP-EIR. No additional environmental review is
'ueld asn puq pnJdecuoc louedns A eawouoca
ue Lflt ueld ctlpeds eql lo luewdola^ap sebernocue lcelord pesod d
eLll 'eJo!ilaqf 'sot fin ]o uoneltdnp JnoL.lJu wnpels puoweq
5unsrxe eql lo LlJou peLudoletep esn poxtw puauuoc eruos oi
alenbepe s/ peou ebeleyy ol papuoJxe ! 'eMO )qel e1e4 5uqsrxe aq1 p
/aatls |eile e Jo eouetqwe eql
aAeq oJ j€a4s ulew )oJ sA o e pue 'sotltfl]ce pntowLuoc pue sseu,snq
JoJ clJJeJl Ateaq steutec leql olnu ssau/snq e se o/l;os sjga-4s: oclruas:
'dWlO aLll o1 5utptoccy 'lenlolqbu loof1g ql!/A laa4s aclruas
e se Jao"4S buudg seguuep! (dryld ueld lalsery u/vtolu/l oO otll c
loorls 5utrds lo tllpuL
lenpeot pue uoneclJtssep aql w)oJrun opw lltlr pafofi pesodofi aq1
'doJdoLll 'slea4s lultJ pue )aupC ueet laq Llcluls stql rc1 6u4dacxe
rolceiloC e se pe1eu6rcep lpee4e s/ laarjs 6u1tdg 1o t116ue1 aq1 q
'pelceptd eq ,u sluepse': bwpunoLtns p ueJp/t pue
Ayaps 'qyeeq oq pLll ansuo ol sJcelJo pJuoaLtJep e^eq ol pauelod slt
ol aNlepJ pezlpue ueeq seLl luewpuowe ueld ptaueb pesodod eq1 e
AltC aql urLll/v\ Jo pooqLoqq6rau eql ur sluaue^oldulr lo {pedord
aq1 o1 snounlur (q ro 'fir3 aLll urr-llr^ ro luaurpuaure pasodord aq1 1o pooqroqqbreu
aql ur.1lrm 6urlronr ro 6urprser suosJed erll lo arellaru\ ;ereue6 ro yolt-uoc 'I1a;es
'LllleoLl eLll ol lelueurrlap (e eq 1ou lp/v\ ]ueupuoure ue;d lereue6 pasodord eq1 ;
:tO-tlOZ oN luaupuauv ueld lerauee 1o ;enordde aq1 ro1 s6utput,r 6utruollol
alll sa)teu lqareq uorssrLuuro3 6uruue16 aql 'apoC ledrcrunyl eJoursl3 elel aLll pue
a,re1 6uruo7 pue 6uruue;6 erurolrlec eql LlllM acueprocce ul leql 'z NolISSs
'epo3 ledrcrunyl
alourslf alel eLll pue ueld Ie.rauag erourslj e)el eLll 1o sarcrlod pue sleo6 aq] qlrm pue
nrrel 6uruo7 pue 6uruue;6 erurolrlec;o sluauerrnber aLl] r.l i!\ ]uelsrsuoc sr iuaupueue
ue;d ;e.raua6 pasodord aql leql seururalap pue spurl pue apoC ;edrcrunyl arourslj
ale-l aql pue ueld lereueg a.rourslj alel aLll '( bas la 00099 SS apoC ^oC 1e3) smel
6uruo7 pue 6uruue;6 erurolrleC aLll o1 ]uensrnd luaupuarue ue;d ;eraua6 pesodord
eq1 pazlleue pue pemer^el seL1 uorssrur.uo3 6utuuel6 eq1 't NOll33S
:sMol-tol sv
u30uo oNV 3Ntt^lufl3o ':l^-]os3u Asfu3H sfoo 'vlNUoll-lvc '3uoNls"l3
fvv-] ro Al-tc 3Hr Jo Norssil twoc gNtNNv'ld 3Hr '3uoJ3u3Hr'MoN
'uay srr-l] o1 lcedsar qym sarped palseralur roqlo pue luaupeda6
lueurdo;ana6 ,{lunururo3 eq1 ,{q palueserd ecuaprna paraprsuoc seLl uorssr.r,ruroC
6uruue;6 aq1 buueaq crlqnd pecrlou Ilnp e 1e gnz'g {ey1 uo 'SVIU3HM
pue:poJrnboJ
gpTa6e4
Lt-gtoz'oN Notrn"tosSu NotssI1 tl loc cNINNV'ld
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2015-37
Page 3 of 4
2. The proposed general plan amendment wrll permit reasonable development of
the area consistent with constraints and will make the areas affected more
compatible with adjacent properties.
a. Spring Street development is constrained by the limited width of the
roadway due to the existence of permanent structures.
3. The proposed general plan amendment would establish land use densities,
intensities and usage more in character with the subject properties' location,
access, and constraints.
a. The proposed general plan amendment recognizes residential and
commercial land use dens/res that are compatible with surrounding
development.
4. The proposed general plan amendment will not have a significant effect on the
environment.
SEGTION 3. Based upon the evidence presented, both written and testimonial,
and the above findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of
General Plan Amendment No. 2014-03, and incorporating the amendment into the
General Plan as shown on Exhibit 'A.'
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this Sth day of May 2015
Joh
City ing Commission
ATTEST:
Planning Manager
Chairm6n
e Elsinore Pl
t
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2015.37
Page 4 of 4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
l, Richard J. MacHott, Planning Manager of the City of Lake Elsinore, California,
hereby certify that Resolution No. 2015-37 was adopted at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore on the 5th day of May, 2015, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: VICE CHAIR JORDAN, COMMISSIONER ARM|T,
COMMISSIONER FLEMING, COMMISSIONER RAY
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: CHAIRMAN GRAY
)"
Richard J. lll5cHott, LEED Associate