HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-07-2009 NAH
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
183 NORTH MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530
TUESDAY, JULY 7, 2009
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Zanelli called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Vice-Chairman Flores led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: CHAIRMAN ZANELLI
VICE-CHAIRMAN FLORES
III COMMISSIONER GONZALES
COMMISSIONER MENDOZA
COMMISSIONER O'NEAL
ABSENT: NONE
STAFF PRESENT
Also present were: Acting Community Development Director Weiner, Deputy City
Attorney Winterswyk, Public Works Director/City Engineer Seumalo, Senior Planner
Harris, and Office Specialist Porche.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Donna Franson, representing the Lake Elsinore Citizens Committee advised the
Commission of their next meeting which is to be held on July 16, 2009 at 7:00 p.m. at
the Tuscany Hills Recreation Center. She stated the guest speaker would be Captain
Cleary speaking of crime prevention and a presentation by Alliance Card Inc. to discuss
a plan recently approved by the City Council to promote local shopping which would
increase local revenue and provide cash rebates to customers.
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM(S)
i
j 1. Minutes for the followina Planning Commission Meeting(s)
a. May 19, 2009
b. June 2, 2009
Planning Commission Meeting
July 7, 2009
Page 2 of 11
Recommendation: approval
~I Commissioner Mendoza requested a change to the May 19, 2009 Minutes on page
3 of 8, in the eighth paragraph adding the text to state "the fact that if this Text
Amendment gets approved it removes all checks and balances a local government
needs."
A motion was made by Commissioner Gonzales and seconded by Commissioner
Mendoza to approve the Consent Calendar with the changes to the May 19, 2009
Regular Planning Commission Minutes.
The following vote resulted:
AYES: CHAIRMAN ZANELLI
VICE-CHAIRMAN FLORES
COMMISSIONER GONZALES
COMMISSIONER MENDOZA
COMMISSIONER O'NEAL
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
PUBLIC HEARING(S)
2. Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336, and Tentative Tract Map No. 35337, for the
"Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan" located on the east side of Camino Del Norte at the
intersection with Main Street
Recommendations:
a. Continue off-calendar to a date to be determined.
Chairman Zanelli pointed out to the audience that this is a continued Public Hearing
and therefore would not be necessary to be re-opened.
Acting Community Development Director Weiner advised the Commission that he
received a request from the applicant by way of email this afternoon to continue the
case off-calendar, in order them to continue to work with staff in order to draft
specific conditions of approval related to traffic mitigation.
Chairman Zanelli requested any public speakers to speak either for or against this
project.
There being no comments from the public, Chairman Zanelli brought the discussion
back to the dais for Commissioner Comments.
Planning Commission Meeting
July 7, 2009
Page 3 of 11
There being no comments from the Planning Commission, Chairman Zanelli closed
the Public Hearing at 6:07 p.m. and requested a motion.
A motion was made by Commissioner Mendoza and seconded by Commissioner
O'Neal to continue off calendar Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336, and Tentative
Tract Map No. 35337, for the "Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan" located on the east
side of Camino Del Norte at the intersection of Main Street.
The following vote resulted:
AYES: CHAIRMAN ZANELLI
VICE-CHAIRMAN FLORES
COMMISSIONER GONZALES
COMMISSIONER MENDOZA
COMMISSIONER O'NEAL
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
3. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2009-04: An Ordinance of the City Council
of the City of Lake Elsinore amending/adding Sections of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code regarding Conditional Use Permits, Variance, and Design Reviews
Recommendations:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 2009- Resolution of the Planning Commission of
the City of Lake Elsinore, California, recommending to the City Council of the
City of Lake Elsinore approval of Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2009-
04.
Acting Community Development Director Weiner stated this project was continued
and staff has provided additional information included in the report presented to the
Commission. He stated he would be available for any questions the Commission
may have.
Donna Franson, resident of Lake Elsinore spoke in opposition of this amendment.
She stated she has check to see how other city Planning Commission's run their
meetings and did not feel there was a reason to change.
Steve Manos, resident of Lake Elsinore spoke in opposition of the changes being
proposed to the Text Amendment change. He stated he was disturbed to hear that
there was consideration being made to make the Planning Commission an advisory
body. He stated it could cause extra time and money for financing considerations
and certain conditions that are involved which would make the extra time necessary
for a Planning Commission process and then the City Council process somewhat
burdensome. He also stated his concerns with the restrictions on campaign
Planning Commission Meeting
July 7, 2009
Page 4 of I I
contributions that candidates can receive from developers. He stated by taking the
initial step away from the Planning Commission, it could create a buffer between the
political interest and the real interests of the constituent. He stated his third point is
that this would create that appearance of impropriety which he believes would be
unfair to the City Council members and is a decision and a process change that
would not just last for this board or council but rather for the next twenty-three (23)
years, so he is hoping the Planning Commission could let the City Council know that
this is a bad idea.
Chairman Zanelli asked if there were any other comments from the public. There
being no additional comments, Chairman Zanelli brought the discussion back to the
dais for Planning Commission Comments.
0
.
HA stated- ha b9l6eve6 It 46 knpeFllant that theFe are teR (10) people reviewiRg
suspeRs;en and RRd Wanted to go on the r4anerd with h(*v he f4RA'S Me
A Varian.Ge aRd stated he does Ret that this is thq prepeF pFeG9duR9 and
`This portion of the Minutes is verbatim:
Commissioner O'Neal: Thank you Mr. Chairman. I apologize for my lack articulation
here. I do not have a problem with being an advisory board to the City Council.
Frankly right now, 75% of what we do is in an advisory capacity. In this particular
case what's being changed are the Conditional Use Permits and that would be no
longer a permanent approval with this process. Its still moves forward to the City
Council. However, having said that, in this Text Amendment there is a significant
problem. I believe and that is with 17.168.110, suspension and revocation. Again, I
don't mind being in an advisory capacity to the City Council, but I do not want that
process removed from the Planning Commission. I made this very clear the last
time the subject was mentioned. I believe it is important that there are ten (10)
people reviewing suspension and revocation, not just five (5). Ultimately if the
decision rests with City Council, that is fine, but I want to be able to go on the record
with how I feel about that suspension or revocation. Because of that I am not going
to vote for this. Again, 1 do not have a problem with being totally an advisory to the
City Council. However I do want to put on the record one more thing. When I was
F1 Chairman of the Planning Commission the Deputy City Attorney sat next to me and
was a wonderful partner for me. She kept me on track. She did amazing things for
me, personally that allowed me to function however well I functioned as Chairman of
the Planning Commission. Having said that I want to say specifically this; the
decision to state by the Deputy City Attorney that you could change a Specific Plan
Planning Commission Meeting
July 7, 2009
Page 5 of 11
R with a Variance I believe is simply not the proper procedure and this effect we are
talking about the proper procedures. I will state again for the record that a Variance
is not a proper thing for a Specific Plan. What you would need is a Specific Plan
Amendment. I think I have a fairly good idea why. I have never spoken to her, but I
have a fairly decent idea of why she might have recommended that was OK. None
the less and it is a valid reason by the way. But none the less in my mind I thought
that it was the improper advice to get to this Commission and we find ourselves in
this position after that particular decision was made. So, thank you Mr.
Chairman.....
Chairman Zanelli: Thank you Commissioner O'Neal. Madam Attomey, would you
care to respond.....
Deputy City Attorney Winterswyk: 1 would just have to ask for clarification of where
that issue came up because I do not recollect that. 1 don't see a reference to that in
the Staff Report or the Resolution, so I am not sure what baring that has on the
matter that is before us. /am just confused about what we are talking about...
Commissioner O'Neal: The reason why I brought that up is, if the advice to this
Commission was that you can not put the Variance do a Specific Plan Amendment,
in my mind then the proper advice and we would not be sitting here today looking at
this particular thing because that would be sent back for a Specific Plan
Amendment, and I specifically remember talking to Tom straight-up about that and it
was your advice that it was OK to do that.....
Deputy City Attorney Winterswyk: I'm sorry I don'Y recollect what you are talking
about.....
Commissioner O'Neal. OK, that is fine....
Deputy City Attorney Winterswyk: Can you tell me what project you're talking about,
is it related to this Text Amendment....
Commissioner O'Neal: Not exactly this amendment, but the reason this Text
Amendment is here is because of a project specifically the project that was on,
what's the name of the street....
Chairman Zanelli: Corydon and Palomar, a storage facility....
Commissioner O'Neal. and it was being put forward that you could ...it was an R-1
zone in a Specific Plan and they were changing it to what ever it was, a
commercial ...I don't remember that part of the detail, but 1 stated at the time that you
could not do that through a Variance, that they had to do a Specific Plan
Amendment and I voted ...I abstained from the vote, specifically for that reason,
~I because I thought that it needed to go back for Specific Plan Amendment. See what
1 am saying....
Deputy City Attorney Winterswyk: I understand and I recall now what you are talking
about. Thank you for clarifying that...
'I
Planning Commission Meeting
July 7, 2009
Page 6 of 11
Commissioner O'Neal. You're welcome.
*End of Verbatim.
Commissioner Gonzales stated that he has been serving on the Planning
Commission for five (5) years and has since seen maybe four (4) items that have
been appealed. He stated does not care to vote for it as it takes all the power away
from the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Mendoza wanted to go on the record by saying he agrees with the
comments from Mrs. Franson and Mr. Maros. He suggested that anyone who does
not agree with the project should attend the City Council meeting and voice their
opinion. He stated by approving this, it would take away the checks and balances of
local government. He stated with the approval of this Text Amendment, the appeal
process would now need to go to the Courts which would cost more money and time
for the applicant, realtor or investor. He further pointed out that only five (5) appeals
have been filed since 2005 which he stated is a good track record.
Vice-Chairman Flores thanked staff for the report to the Planning Commission on the
studies and surveys of surrounding City's indicating the Conditional Use Permit
process and the final decision. He also thanked staff for the count of appeals that
have been submitted however pointed out that a statement made by Mayor Magee .
was the fact that some of the applicants felt confused and did not see that anywhere
in the report. He stated it is difficult to make a decision based on how confusing this
process is. He stated he is basing his decision on facts and does not support the
reason to vote for the project.
Chairman Zanelli stated that he is in full agreement with the Commission. He
quoted a statement made by the Mayor where he spoke of where members of the
public were left confused by the process related to land use matters. He further
pointed out that the Mayor requested an open discussion on the topic yet he has
never had any discussion with the Mayor or any other Councilmember. He stated
this removes an appeal process for the applicant or any member of the public and
this system has worked for many years as well as for many other cities and feels
there is no reason to change it at this time.
Commissioner O'Neal pointed out that Mr. Manos made a very good point by
speaking of campaign contributions. He stated it seems to indicate that perhaps
more power should be given to the Planning Commission rather than less as they
are not guided by the developer.
Chairman Zanelli spoke of a project that the Planning Commission approved which
was a CUP and a Variance that some of the Councilmembers were not happy with.
He stated they had the right to appeal the decision as well as any member of the
public. He recommended that Industrial Design Review be taken from the City
Council and approved at the Planning Commission level.
There being no further comments, Chairman Zanelli closed the Public Hearing at
6:28 p.m. and requested a motion.
I
Planning Commission Meeting
July 7, 2009
Page 7 of 11
The motion was declared lost for Resolution No. 2009-42, recommending 10 the City
Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approval of Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment
No. 2009-04.
A substitute motion was made by Commissioner O'Neal, seconded by
Commissioner Mendoza to deny Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2009-04.
The following vote resulted:
AYES: CHAIRMAN ZANELLI
VICE-CHAIRMAN FLORES
COMMISSIONER GONZALES
COMMISSIONER MENDOZA
COMMISSIONER O'NEAL
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
A motion was made by Chairman Zanelli and seconded by Commissioner Mendoza to
change or add language to the Text Amendment to have all Design Reviews stopped
at the Planning Commission level.
The following vote resulted:
AYES: CHAIRMAN ZANELLI
VICE-CHAIRMAN FLORES
COMMISSIONER GONZALES
COMMISSIONER MENDOZA
COMMISSIONER O'NEAL
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
BUSINESS ITEM(S)
4. Reorganization of the Planning Commission
Fj Chairman Zanelli opened the floor for nominations for Chairman of the Planning
Commission.
Commissioner O'Neal nominated Commissioner Gonzales for the Planning
Commission Chairman.
I
Planning Commission Meeting
July 7, 2009
Page 8 of 11
Commissioner Mendoza nominated Vice-Chairman Flores for the Planning
Commission Chairman.
Commissioner Gonzales indicated that he would not object being elected Chairman
for the Planning Commission as he had served on the Commission as Vice
Chairman in the past.
Vice-Chairman Flores had no comments.
Chairman Zanelli concurred with Commissioner Mendoza's nomination for Vice-
Chairman Flores being nominated for the Chairman of the Planning Commission.
The motion for Commissioner Gonzales failed for lack of second.
A motion was made by Commissioner Mendoza and seconded by Chairman Zanelli
to elect Vice-Chairman Flores for Chairman of the Planning Commission until 2010.
The following vote resulted:
AYES: CHAIRMAN ZANELLI
VICE-CHAIRMAN FLORES
COMMISSIONER GONZALES
COMMISSIONER MENDOZA
COMMISSIONER O'NEAL
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
Commissioner Mendoza nominated Commissioner Gonzales for Vice-Chairman of
the Planning Commission.
A motion was made by Commissioner Mendoza, seconded by Commissioner O'Neal
to elect Commissioner Gonzales as the Vice-Chairman of the Planning Commission
until July 2010.
The following vote resulted:
AYES: CHAIRMAN ZANELLI
VICE-CHAIRMAN FLORES
COMMISSIONER GONZALES
COMMISSIONER MENDOZA
COMMISSIONER O'NEAL
F1 NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
I
Planning Commission Meeting
July 7, 2009
Page 9 of 11
ABSTAIN: NONE
STAFF COMMENTS
Public Works Director/City Engineer Seumalo commented on the following:
• He congratulated newly elected Chairman Flores and Vice-Chairman Gonzales on
their new positions with the Planning Commission.
• He thanked Commission Zanelli for the past year of serving as Chairman for the
Planning Commission.
• He spoke of the road improvements along State Highway 74 and the 1-15 Freeway
interchange. He stated the paving should begin within a couple of weeks and it is
anticipated the project to be finalized by the end of the month.
• He advised the Commission that the City Council approved for a signal to be
installed at the intersection of Gunnerson and Riverside Drive.
• He thanked Commissioner Mendoza for his attention to the grading along La Strada
and advised the Commission that the issues have been corrected.
Senior Planner Harris commented on the following:
• He congratulated the new appointees and wished them success.
~I Office Specialist Porch6 commented on the following:
• She thanked Commissioner Zanelli for all of his hard work serving as the Chairman
`for the Planning Commission over the past year and congratulated Chairman Flores
and Vice-Chairman Gonzales on their new positions.
Acting Community Development Director Weiner commented on the following:
• He congratulated Chairman Flores and Vice-Chairman Gonzales and thanked
Commissioner Zanelli for all of his hard work and help over the past year.
Deputy City Attorney Winterswyk commented on the following:
• She congratulated Chairman Flores and Vice-Chairman Gonzales and indicated it is
a pleasure working with all of the Commission.
PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS
Commissioner Mendoza commented on the following:
• He thanked the City Engineer for helping out with the grading that was taking place
j off La Strada.
Planning Commission Meeting
July 7, 2009
Page 10 of 11
FJ Commissioner O'Neal commented on the following:
• He asked Acting Community Development Director Weiner if the two banners were
removed from Riverside Drive over the 4t' of July weekend. Acting Community
Development Director Weiner indicated that staff was alerted by several members of
the community and it was handled accordingly.
Commissioner Zanelli commented on the following:
• He wished everyone a good-night and thanks for the all the help received from City
staff.
• He suggested to Mrs. Franson and Mr. Manos that he hopes to see them at the next
City Council Meeting.
Vice-Chairman Gonzales commented on the following:
• He congratulated Chairman Flores on being elected Chairman.
• He spoke of the weeds that are out of control below his property.
Chairman Flores commented on the following:
• He thanked the Commission for all their help with the guidance and would continue
to ask for help when needed and looks forward to working with staff.
ADJOURNMENT
It was the consensus of the Commission to adjourn to the July 21, 2009, Regular
Planning Commission meeting at 6:00 p.m. located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake
Elsinore, CA. 92530.
Chairman Flores adjourned the meeting at 6:51 p.
JIM FL RES, CHAIRMAN
NNING COMMISSION
Re pectfullynSub itted,
l -7
DANA PORCH
n OFFICE SPECIALIST III
Planning Commission Meeting
July 7, 2009
Page 11 of 11
ATTEST:
TOM WEINER
ACTING DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
I I