Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-21-2003 NAHMINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2003 The Regulax Planning Commission Meeting was called to ordex at 6:01 PM. by Chairtnan Baxnes. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissionex Uhlxy. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, MATTHIES, NASH, UHLRY, & LAl'ERE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Also present were: Community Development Dixector Bxady, Planning Managex Associate Plannex Millex, City Engineex O'Donnell, Community Development Technician Hennuigs and Deputy City Attoxney Steve Miles. PUBLIC COMMENTS NONE CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR. Minutes 1. Januuy 21, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JANUARY 21, 2003 BUSINESS ITEMS 2. Design Review of Residential Pxoject No. 2002-09 Corman Leigh Communities (Txact No. 29637~ Community Development D~ectox Brady indicated that this is a xequest fox a Design Review fox the development of a Residential Pxoject consisting and asked that Associate Plannex Millex review the xequest with the Planuing Comnvssion. Associate Plannex Millex indicated that this is a Design Review fox a Residenrial pxoject that will have 44 lots to include a Model Home Complex. She stated that the pxoject would be located on Running Deex Road. She commented that the lots xange fxom 6,000 squaxe feet to 12,521 squaxe feet with the avexage size of 7,371 squaxe feet. She stated that thxee plans would be offeYed. She indicated that the axchitect~al design is a Meditexxanean style, and the coloxs axe easth tones. Associate Plannex Millex stated that a quesrion was xaised if offsite gxading easement could be obtained. She stated that because of this, Condirion No. 24 was added fox that purpose. She indicated that the applicant has indicated that appxoval has been given fox the gxading, howevex she has not xeceived vexification. Associate Plannex Millex stated that the pxoject meets the minim~ xequ~ements of the LEMC, and xecommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution and approve the Residential Pxoject No. R 2002-09 based on the Findings, Exhibits and is subjected to the Condirions of Appxoval. Chairman Baxnes xequested comments fxom the Public. John Boggs, Vice Pxesident of Coxman Leigh Communiries stated that he is please to be woxking with the City. He stated that he has xeceived appxoval for offsite gxading and would be pxoviding Staff evith copies of the appxoval lettexs. He indicated that he has xead and agxeed to the Condiuons of Appxoval. Lee Middlebxook, 16510 Running Deex Road, Lake Elsinoxe. He indicated that he has some concerns with the ~ainage and the constnxcrion teaffic. He stated that he believes Mountain Stseet has a weight xestricrion, and wanted to know how the construction traffic would be handled. Cha~man Baxnes asked if anyone else wished to speak fox ox against the pxoject. Heaxing none, discussion was bxought back to the table fox Commissionex's comments. Comnussionex Nash asked City Engineex O'Donnell what the weight xestxictions axe on Mountain Street. City Engineex O'Donnell indicated that Mountain Street is not a truck xoute; howevex, a truck can utilize the stseet if a delivery is necessary. He stated that the only way to the job site is tl~ough Mountain and Rolando. PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JANUARY 21, 2003 Commissionex Nash asked if Runnuig Deex Road would evex go thxough to Lake Stxeet. City Engineex O'Donnell stated yes. Commissionex Nash asked if a txaffic signal would be installed at Mountain and Lake. City Engineex O'Donnell indicated that a txaffic signal is xequixed at that locarion. Lee Middlebxook asked about a weight xestxicrion on that xoad. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that he did not think that thexe is a weight xestriction on that street. Lee Middlebxook stated that he thought that he saw a sign that indicated a 2 ox 3-ton weight xestricrion, and xequested that tlus should be looked into. City Engineex O'Donnell agreed to have this looked into. Commissionex Nash stated that he liked the designs of the homes, especially the window tseatments. He had no furthex quesrions. Coxnmissionex Uhlry asked about Condirion No. 37 whexe it states that a sign shall be place at the end of Redwood Drive stating that this a"stub not a cul-de-sac." Community Development Directox Bxady stated that the City wants to let the public know that Redwood Dxive may eventually go thsough someday fox futuxe development, as it is not a cul-de-sac. Coxsunissionex Uhlty stated that he did not have a copy of the gxacling plans, and is familiax with the axea. He stated that he has seen that axea aftex a good xain, and know how much watex collects, and runs off Mountain and onto Lake Sueet. He asked how this pxoject is going to handle the addiuonal watex flow. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that he has xeviewed the gxading plans and they aze in plan check. He stated that he believes that this pxoject is not conditioned to extend the stoxm dxain. He indicated that aftex a xain, thexe could be some minox flooding; howevex, most of the watex will flow down the stoxm c~ain on Mountain and onto Lake Stxeet. Cominissionex Uhlxy expxessed that it would have been helpful fox him to visualize this pxoject if he had a copy of the gxading plan. He had no fuxthex quesuons. Commissionex LaPexe asked about Condition No. 20 whexe it discusses fencing. He asked if the applicant is xequ~ed to pxovide wxought iron ox tubulax fencing. Community Development D~ectox Bxady stated that wsought ison and tubulaz fencing axe the same. PAGE 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JANUARY 21, 2003 Comuussionex LaPexe conci~s cvith Coxmnissionex Nash on the design, and had no farthex comments. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies stated that she is glad to see that the developer has an open communication with the e~cisting xesidents in the axea. John Boggs stated that he undexstands that construction can sometimes cxeate a nuisance fox the e~sting xesidents, and he will try to minimi~e that. He indicated that if anyone is to call and complain about something, that the call be xefexxed to hun. Vice Chaiuwoman Matthies stated that no constxucrion should staxt until 7:00 am. Community Development D~ectox Bxady pointed out that the ho~s of construcrion axe oudined in Condirion No. 23. Vice Chaiiwoman Mattlues commented on the woxding used in Condirion No. 37. She pxefexxed not using the woxd "stub" and suggested on finding a diffexent woxd to use. She stated that she liked the looks of the pxoject, especially the window treaunents. She had no fuxthex quesrions. Cha~man Barnes asked about the ditch betcveen lots 37 and 38, at the end of Evexgxeen. John Boggs indicated that the ditch is coming fxom offsite onto the pxoject, and that the developexs axe still cuxxently woxking on that. He stated that Staff has not yet seen a copy of the plans yet. Chaixman Baxnes had no fuxthex questions and asked fox the xeading of the Resoluuon MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-01, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF I.AKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2002-09, CONSISTING OF 44 LOTS WHICH INCLUDES A MODEL HOME COMPLEX, LOCATED NORTH OF RUNNING DEER ROAD AND WEST OF LAKE STREET (TRACT NO. 29637) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS NONE PAGE 5- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JANUARY 21, 2003 STAFF COMMENTS Community Development Dixectox Bxady commented on the following • He thanked the Cominission fox attending the Study Session. He stated that the Study Sessions maybe held at a diffexent time, and that if thexe axe any ideas that the Coxmnission has, that Staff would conveyed it to the Council ox the Commission could shaxe the ideas with the Mayox hexself. PI.ANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Cha~man Baxnes commented on the followine: • No comments Vice Cha~woman Matthies commented on the followine: • No comments Commissionex LaPere commented on the followine: • He suggested to Staff that when thexe is going to be a Planning Conunission meeting following a two houx Study Session that some type of nourishment be pxovided. Cormnissionex Uhlry commented on the following • He wanted to let Staff know that he is looking forwaxd to the pxoject, and expxessed on how the pxoject will help beaurify the axea. He indicated to Staff that it was difficult fox hun to make a decision tonight, without the infoxmarion that could have been pxovided. Commissionex Nash commented on the following: • Thanked Staff fox all the haxd woxk. PAGE 6- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JANUARY 21, 2003 ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY MATTHIES SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PI.ANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 6:35 PM. ~_ ik~%~~-_~.+-~..o-~•- OHN BARNES, CHAIRMAN Respectfiilly Submitted, ~.~~ ~ ~~ ~~ Dana C. Poxche' Community Development Clexk ATTEST: Robext A. Brady, Seczetary to the Planning Commission MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET T.AKF: ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2003 The Regulax Planning Cointcussion Meeting was called to oxder at 6:02 PM. by Chaunian Baxnes. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Conuzvssionex Bames. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, NASH, UHLRY, & LAI'ERE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MATTHIES Also present were: Community Development Dixectox Bxady, Planning Managex Villa, Planuing Consultant Donahoe, City Engineex O'Donnell, Community Development Clexk Typist Poxche', and Deputy City Attoxney Steve Miles. PUBLIC COMMENTS NONE CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR. Minutes 1. January 21, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Amendment No.1 to the La Laguna Estates Specific Plan No. 92-4 and Tentative Txact Ma~ No. 30788. PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 Chaixman Baxnes excused himself fxom this poxtion of the meeting due to conflict of intexest and xequested Commissionex LaPexe lead the discussion duxing his absence. Coxmnissionex LaPexe opened the Public Heaxing at 6:05 PM. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that this Public Hearing befoxe the Coinwission is a xequest for an amendment to the La Laguna Specific Plan and fox Tentarive Txact Map 30788. Community Development Duectox Bxady xequested that Pxoject Plannex Donahoe xead the Staff Report, and answex any questions that the Commission may have. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe indicated that Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 and Tentative Txact Map No. 30788 axe fox the intention of allowing Foxecast Homes to build 110 single family detached dwellings. She stated that the City appxoved Paxcel Map 30787, dividing the site into two pascels fox the purpose of sale. She noted that Foxecast Homes is pxoposing to develop the fixst phase and possibly the entixe Specific Plan. Howevex, she indicated that because Foxecast Homes pxoduct line is fox single-family homes, they wish to amend the Plan, eliminating the attached pxoducts originally appxoved and xeplacing them with single-family detached product. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe indicated that the La Laguna Specific Plan was appxoved by the City Council in Novembex 1998. She stated that at that time, the Specific Plan called fox the development of 489 acxes into 660 dwelling units and 282 acxes of open space. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe indicated that Foxecast Homes is xequesting to amend the La Laguna Estates Specific Plan by eliminating the Emexgency Assess Road that connects the fixst phase of the Plan to Sunswept Drive and xeplace it with a full width public street. She commented that also Foxecast Homes would like to xevise the phasing of development, staxting at the easternmost boundaxy adjacent to existing xesidenrial neighboxhoods, and pxog7essing westexly. In addirion she stated that Foxecast Homes would like to xealign the multi-purpose teial system with the Plan fox public use and ]asdy to pxovide xefinements, clarificarions and updates to maintenance of open space, xecxearional aseas, hillside development standaxds, conceptual landscape plan, monumentation, neighborhood identification, and mitigarion monitoxing pxo~am. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe stated that Tentarive Txact Map 30788 divides 47 acxes in phase one into 110 xesidential lots and two open space lots. She stated that the lot sizes xange fxom 4,700 squaxe feet to 16,000 squaxe feet. She noted that the smallex lot sizes would be fox the interiox poxrion of the site, and the largex lot sizes axe designed axound the extexiox, adjacent to open space and e~sting xesidences. She stated that the Map yields an avexage lot size of 7,580 squaxe feet, and a density of 2.34 dwelling units per acxe. Pxoject Planner ponahoe indicated that the Map is designed to take primary access fxom McVickex Canyon Paxk Road at south end of the txact. She stated that a pioposed secondary access to Sunswept Drive at the noxth end of the tsact xequixes that the Specific Plan Amendment eliminate the pxeviously appxoved Emexgency Assess Road and xeplace it with a public street. She stated that she has been woxking with the Applicant on the xealignment of the Community Txail. She noted PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 that the plan is to have the txail adjacent to the homes from the west side of the main street, and away fxom the natural open space. She indicated that the Applicant has agxeed to loop the tsail by extending the e~cisting teail whexe it ends at Oak Txee Paxk, and bring it into the pxoject, down to McVickex Park. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe stated the issues of concexn aze the opposirion and suppoxt of Sunswept Dxive as a thxough stxeet. She indicated that the seven xesidents who live on Sunswept Drive submitted a petirion, objecting to the pxoposal to have Sunswept Drive connect to the pxoject due to txaffic issues. She stated that the Applicant met with the seven xesidences last week, yet the seven xesidences axe still objecting to the project. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe stated that Kuzman Associates dated Decembex 31, 2002 did a txaffic study, and that information is available. She noted that the City Engineex would moxe than likely discuss the ~affic study with the Cotiuiussion. She indicated ovexall the Fixe Depaxtment and the Engineering Department of the City suppoxts the design of the map with the double access, vexsus a access off McVickex. She stated that the traffic study also checked the sight distances fxom Sunswept onto Lincoln Stseet. She indicated that the xesults showed that sight distances wexe inadequate due to the ovexgxowth of the ~ees. She stated that because of sight distance, they issued a woxk oxdex. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe stated that anothex axea of concexn is the 4,700 squaxe foot lots that axe being pxoposed by the Applicant. She indicated that sevexal adjacent xesidents have indicated that they axe against the smallex lots. She stated that the applicant has made efforts to meet with the neighboxs and addxess theu concems priar to the Public Hearing. She noted that Staff conc~s that thexe is a maxket fox smallex lots in the City and appxeciates Foxecast Homes desixe to all facets of the Housing Maxket. Howevex, she stated that Staff's concexn is the product and quality that the Specific Plan had call fox when it was appxoved. She noted that Staff has had ongoing discussions with the Applicant concexning the axchitectaral guidelines, which wexe originally xemoved tl~ough the Specific Plan Amendment. She noted that they axe now in the Amendment, and the Applicant has made eveiy effoxt to comply with the guidelines. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe stated that she has handed out to the Coisunission two lettexs xeceived. One she stated is fxom a Mx. Yokum and the othex by Mx. and Mxs. Dennis. She indicated that she also handed out to the Commission an update to the mitigarion-monitoring pxogxam, a bxochure with the elevations that axe on the material boaxds, a packet that includes the Exxata sheets, and xevisions and lasdy the addirions, delerions and coxiecrions to the Conditions of Appxoval. Pioject Plannex Donahoe indicated she added two Conditions. She stated the fixst Condirion to be added would be numbex 5, which was left out of the original Condirions. She stated that the Condition asks fox a clean copy of the Specific Plan Amendment, once the Hearing pxocess is completed. She stated that Condirion Numbex SD states that Oak txee would not do well in the axea of the pxoject, and is xequesting that the Applicant select a diffexent type of txee. She stated that Condition Numbex 6 is xequesting any e~cisting Oak ~ees to be relocated and pxeseroed. She stated that the Applicant should contact an axboxist befoxe any of the Oak txee be xemoved without causing any haxm to the txees. She noted that Condirion No. 10 discusses the Tentarive Txact Map development standaxds axe within the Specific Plan Amendtnent. She stated that on Condirion No. 11, it PAGE 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 discusses that a loop would be pxovided on the tsail, xealignment, and concept. She indicated that Condition No. 18 discusses the seivices, and cost xecovery pxogxam. She indicated that pxiox to the Design Review, Staff is xequesting foux sided axchitect~al ~awings. She indicated that Conditions No.'s 45 and 46 would be deleted. She noted that on the last page of the xevised Conditions, Community Seroices added Condirions to discuss the HOA, tsails, slopes, and pazkways, private xecxeation faciliries that would be pxoposed in the plan. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe indicated that she is xecommending appxoval of the La Laguna Estates Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 and the Tentative Txact Map 30788, based on the Findings, Exhibits, and Condiuons of Appxoval. She stated that the Applicant, Landscape Axchitect, Consultant, Envixonmental Consultant, Axchitect and the Engineex fox the pxoject is pxesent, and would be available to answex any questions that the Coinmission may have. Community Development Directox Bxady pointed out that the Design Review fox the pxoject would be discussed at a latex date. Cominissionex LaPexe xequested that the Applicant appxoach the podiuxn fox quesrions and comments. Applicant Ellen Michiel stated that she is the Pxoject Plannex fox pxoject. She wanted to thank Staff and stated that she has had the pleasuxe of woxking with Planning Consultant Donahoe, Planning Managex Villa, and the City Engineex. She indicated that thexe axe a few of the Conditions of Appxoval that she would like to discuss with Staff and the Comnussion. She noted that Condirion No. 4 whexe it discusses the TUMF Fees, the development agxeement specifically exempts this pxoject from any fees that axe dealing with traffic and teaffic signal facility that wexe not included in the CFD and axe not covexed by the development mitigarion fee. She stated that the Count~s TUMF oxdinance sights these kinds of pxojects, which had appxoved development agxeement puxsuant to the appxopxiate section of the California Govexnment Code. Thexefose, she Tequested that they be exempt from these fees. Applicant Ellen Micl~iel stated that thexe axe tcvo concexns with the Condiuons fox the Tentarive Txact Map that she would like to addxess. One she stated is the Flood Contxol Dis~ict and the othex was to do cvith the traffic signal being xecommended. She stated that the Condiuons aze xequesting a traffic signal at McVickex and Gxand and the othex at McVickex and Audelo. She noted that in the tsaffic xeport it states that the teaffic signal at McVickex and Audelo might be xequixed. She indicates that she feels that the signal at McVickex and Audelo might not be warsanted, and xequested that the Condition be xemoved. She stated that the signal at McVickex and Gxand was uidicated necessaxy accoxcling to the txaffic study. Howevex, she stated that the Tzaffic Engineex indicated that the signal would only be necessuy at the 156 single-family dwelling units and the teaffic at McVickex had xeached 1,700 txips per day. She stated that the pxoject is pxesendy at 200 trips pex day. She noted that the Condirion xequests that the signal be installed at the 20 cexrificate of occupancy for the f~st phase. She indicated that they pxefex to have it installed at the second phase, ox later in the fixst phase. PAGE 5- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 Applicant Ellen Micluel stated that with xespect to the Specific Plan, she indicated that only one item missing from the Exxata sheets, which is an exxor in the e~ibits. She indicated that phase one is befoxe the Commission; howevex, phase tcvo is still in design, and not &nalized. She stated that it is Foxecast Homes intenrion of offering a vaxiety of pxoducts in the Specific Plan. She noted that Foxecast Homes believes that this pxoduct will offex a vaxiety of lots sizes and elevauons. Coxsunissionex LaPere thanked Applicant Ellen Michiel fox hex comments and xequested comments fxom the public. Cominissionex LaPexe xequested iV~. Woody Woodwaxd to appsoach the podium. Woody Woodwaxd, 29108 Sunswept Drive, Lake Elsinoxe, CA indicated that he is against this pxoject due to the traffic and the safety. He stated that nobody with the exception to the xesidence 300 feet of the pxoject wexe notified of this pxoject, and will not be until the gxacling of the pxoject begins. He suggested having a Public Heaxing at one of the school in the axea. He suggests Rice Elementary School. He stated that some of the xesidents in the azea have alxeady had a meeting discussing the txaffic and safety issues. He noted that ovex 200 homeowners attended the meeting. He stated that he knew that a~affic study was conducted, howevex he indicated that the study was conducted in Decembex when the school was closed fox the holidays. He stated that the majority of the traffic in the axea is before and aftex schooL He indicated that the intexsecrion of Sunswept and Lincoln is very difficult to get out of safely. He stated that adding 110 homes in the axea and fioo~r?ng 2.4 caxs per household at 4 trips in and out pex day, comes to 1000 caxs that will be using that intersecuon. Mx. Woodwaxd he is a Genexal Enginee~ng Contxactot and is familiax to these types of piojects. He stated that he has attended many Public Hearings, and indicated that the project that is being pxoposed is one of 50 diffexent designs that could be offexed for this pxopexty. He stated that the xeason the buildex selected this design is because it is the fastest and cheapest to build. Howevex, he indicated this is not what the existing xesidents wants to see. He stated that he would like an oppoxtunity to get moxe input from the community and of those people who would be effected by the addition of the homes. He stated that he wxote to the newspapex about this pxoject, and the newspapex did not menrion the traffic hazaid, ox othex issues that he bxought up. Mr. Woodwaxd stated that he did not xealize that Staff was going to xecommend appxoval of this pxoject until rivo days ago. He indicated that the School District now chaxges a fee fox bus transpoxtarion, and because of this, thexe axe moxe paxent walking and driving their childxen to school. Dolly Woodwaxd, 29108 Sunswept Dxive, Lake Elsinoxe, CA stated hex concexns with this pxoject axe the txaffic. She stated that at the end of Sunswept, it is a dead end. She indicated that if Sunswept Dxive is opened up, that it would be a nightmase waiting to happen. She said that hex primuy concexn is police pxotecuon. She also stated that from Gxand to Rice Canyon School, thexe axe not any cxosswalks. She indicated that during the meeting that was held at the school, a question was raised about police piotecrion at the noxth end of the City. She stated that she was told that the City does not have enough police officexs to patxol that azea. She indicated that if the City wexe going to have 1000 moxe vehicles traveling down Lincoln, then the City would need moxe police officexs. Mxs. Woodwaxd stated at nighttime, you could heax the caxs xacing down Lincoln. She stated that many complaints have been made; yet nothing has been done. PAGE 6- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 Robin Cxotteau, 29104 Sunswept Drive, Lake Elsinoxe, CA stated hex concems axe with the ovexcxowding of the schools. She indicated that with anothex 110 homes coxning into the axea, she is concemed to know whexe the additional chil~en will attend school. Mark Dennis, 29003 Whitesails Couxt, Lake Elsinoxe, CA indicated that the Tentative Txact Map 30788 xeplaces 180 attached dwelling units with 110 single family detached homes, xanging in sizes fxom 4,700 squaxe feet to 16,000 squaxe feet He stated that Tuscany Hills has similax topogxaphy, yet has no lots this small. He indicated that if the 4,700-1ot size is an exception to the City's c~xent minim~ standards fox a single-family xesidence, then why this is xecommended fox appxoval. He stated that xegaxcling piesent and futare txaffic impacts, e~ting Whitesails Couxt has become less safe since Lincoln Avenue was stxipped fox two lanes. He stated that this is because it is necessary to xoll out beyond the e~sting stop bas, in oxdex to get a cleax view of on coming tsaffic at the cuxxent allowed speed litnit. He stated that the Staff xepoxt acknowledges this Condition. He indicated that since the public has not had a chance to xeview the teaffic analysis xepoxt, he asked if this pxoject would be condirioned to install some type of txaffic contxol meas~es on Lincoln, eithex in this phase ox in a futare phase and at what specific locations. He stated that with xegaxds to the slopes above his cul-de-sac and Wayfare Sueet he xegxets the loss of v~tually all of the e~sting narive vegetation and habitat it pxovides and asked how fax the slope itself would have to be taken down when it is xe-engineexed. He stated that he undexstands that most of the slope would be xemanufactuxed and landscaped to meet f~e requixements and othex standaxds. He indicated that homeownexs and not the City would be xesponsible fox the maintenance. He asked to what assuxance can be given in oxdex fox the slopes to be pxopexly caxe fox, and what type of action would be taken should a complaint be made. Lasdy, he stated, thexe is an oak tree at the end of Sunswept Drive. He asked that if the public xoad is appxoved, could the oak txee be xelocated. Bxad Hollexback, 29125 Wayfaxe Coart, Lake Elsinoxe stated that he has been a xesident fox 12 yeaxs, and concurs with his fellow xesidents. He stated that Lake Elsinose is a wondexful community and is all fox the futare gxowth developments in the City, if they axe handled coxxectly. He indicated that what makes a gxeat City axe choices, and he stated that he was able to move into a laxge home with a lazge lot. He noted those fut~e xesidents coming ~om Oxange County ox San Diego County is looking foz laxgex lots, not small lots. He stated that the City of Lake Elsinoxe has what it takes to attract new homeownexs coming fxom those axeas. Texry Millex, 29216 Sandpipex, Lake Elsinoxe stated that he has lived in Lake Elsinoxe fox 12 yeazs and enjoys the community. He stated that he has two concexns. One he stated is safety. He commented that he has seen caxs xacing down Lincoln all the time. He stated that the developex could possibly have speed butnps installed ox cxosswalks. He stated that signals axe a necessity. Mx. Millex indicated that when he e~ts Sandpipex, the views axe obstructed mainly on the left. He stated that his second issue is what type of assistance is the developex going to give fox the tsaffic issues. He indicated that speed bumps and cxosswalks axe a muiox expense. Mx. Millex also asked what the second phase would include and when will construction begin. I{arla Papaco, 29101 Wayfaxe Lane, Lake Elsinoxe stated that she too has had a vexy positive experience living in Lake Elsinare with the City's Staff and with Foxecast Homes. She stated that what Foxecast Homes has pxoposed is not acceptable. She stated that she is not against PAGE 7- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 development in the city ox development of the land in quesrion. Howevex, she indicated that changes need to be made in a safety aspect. She noted that txaffic is going to be hoxxendous on Lincoln with the addition of 110 new homes. She stated that having an access at Gxand instead of Sunswept would be a bettex idea. Ms. Papaco also menrioned that the schools in the area ~e akeady at the~ capacity. She asked whexe axe these childxen going to attend school. Michael Ruetex, 29100 Sunswept, Lake Elsinoxe stated that his main concexn is the safety of his ~anddaughtex who lives with him. Gaxxett Smith, 29132 Wayfaxe Count, Lake Elsinoxe stated that he has tl~ee concems. One he stated is the lot sizes that Foxecast Homes is pxoposing. He stated that smallex lot sizes would decxease the value of the axea. He stated that his second concexn is the teaffic issue. He stated that the moxe accesses you have in the axea, the bettex off the traffic would be. He commented that using McVickex Paxk Lane would be a big mistake, and thexe ase traffic issues along Lincoln as well. He stated that his final concexns axe the Public Hearing. He indicated that vexy few xesidences on his street have been getting the norices of the Public Heaxings. He suggested notifying moxe xesidences in the ~ea, so that they could expxess the~ concexn as well. With no furthex xequests to speak, Cotiuiussionex LaPexe asked applicant Ellen Michiel to appxoach the podium to answex some of the questions that the public has ad~essed. Ellen Michiel stated that she has had the chance to speak with the public and undexstands the concexns that they have. She indicated that this pxoject has been befoxe the city fox almost 15 yeaxs. She stated that the Specific Plan was inirially appxoved in 1998. She noted that the primary concexns seemed to be the traffic on Lincoln and the itnpact of opening Sunswept. She noted that phase one would be the only phase accessing Sunswept. Mo Faghihi, Webb Associates Civil Engineex stated that the tsaffic study indicated that 44 trips wexe made in the moxning and 66 trips wexe made in the aftexnoon. He stated that this is a very small pexcentage of traffic genexated by the entire Specific Plan. He also xequested that Condirion No. 60 is xevised to xead; submit Hydrology and Hyc~aulic Repoxts fox ieview and appxoval by City Engineex and the Rivexside County Flood Contxol District if necessary priox to appxoval of final map. Commissionex Nash asked the City Engineex if the City follows County standaxds. City Engineex O'Donnell indicated that the City follows Rivexside County Flood Contxol Standaxds. Coxsunissionex Nash indicated that what the Civil Engineex was asking was mute, as the City would need to follow the County's Standaxds xegaxdless. Mo Faghihi indicated that the issues axe not with preparing the xepoxt. He indicated that they must submit the xeport to the City and County fox theix xeview. He stated that because of the County's volume of woxk, theix xesponse is very slow and takes a long time fox the plan check pxocess. PAGE 8- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 City Engineer O'Donnell indicated that he would not object having Condirion No. 60 changed. Coinmissionex LaPexe asked if the CivIl Engineex has any othex changes. Mo Faghihi indicated that he had no furthex statements. Ellen Michiel indicated that the txaffic study was noted that it was done in Decembex; howevex, she stated that the txaffic study was actually done in Novembex and published in Decembex. She also indicated that Foxecast Homes is exempt fxom paying any traffic nnprovements, howevex axe paying fox impact fees. Mike Boyd, Axchitectuxal Consultant fox Foxecast Homes stated that he has met with Staff to discuss the guidelines fox the Specific Plan. He stated that he has selected homes with a lot of axchitectural designs to include a Spanish, Santa Baxbaxa and Montexey style, and would match the color and styles histoxically. He stated that stxeet scene is very unpoxtant, so poxches, pxe-entry co~ts and varied xoof masses were designed. He stated that thxee of the fo~ plans have thxee elevarions each. He indicated that he would be available fox any questions. Commissionex LaPexe asked Mx. Boyd if these were the designs to be used tl~ough out the project. Mx. Boyd indicated that this design would be used thxough out the pxoject. He stated that he feels that these homes axe high quality and indicated that Staff has been very helpful. He had no fuxthex comments. Applicant Ellen Michiel appxoached the podium and indicated that she bxought with hex xeduced handout pict~es of the design that Foxecast Homes would be using, and that if the public wexe intexested in looking at these xeductions, they may do so. Ellen Michiel then indicated that hex Landscape Axchitect would like to appxoach the podium. Gxeg Densin, Landscape Axchitect 10621 Church Steeet, Rancho Cucamonga thanked Staff fox the oppoxtwzity to woxk with him. He stated that he has developed very good oprions fox this pxoduct, using the Montexey, Santa Baxbasa style. He indicated that theix goals wexe to establish a stsong community identity and felt that this could be achieved by pxomoting a community gateway. He stated that he has woxked with Staff to cxeate setbacks for a high fixe axea bp xemoving highly flammable species and woxking with the narive vegetation, which would be maintained by the HOA and would rie in with the suxxounding style of Lake Elsinoxe. He stated that some flood control basin would be scxeened with an evexgxeen screen. He had no fixxthex quesrions. Coizuiussionex LaPexe asked Applicant Ellen Michiel if she had any closing comments fox the Commission. Applicant Ellen Michiel stated that she is very pxoud of this pxoject. She stated that she believe that this is a high quality pioject. She stated that she believes that the homes axe scaled appxopriating to the lot sizes and will be an excellent addirion to the community. PAGE 9- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 Commissionex LaPeie asked the Community Development D~ectox Bxady if he had any comments befoie it would be bxought back to the Coimnission. Community Development D~ectox Bxady pointed out that one of the Condirions xequests that all new homeownexs would pay a fee that would pxovide police and fire service to help offset the costs. Cominissionex Nash asked Staff about the TUMF Fees. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that this pxoject is exempt from these fees. Cominissionex Nash asked if teaffic signals wexe being based on teaffic volume instead of occupancy. Community Development Dixector Bxady indicated that the installation of the signals is at cextain levels of development. Ellen Michiel indicated that they pay the developex impact fees, and is xequesting that the signals be installed when waxxanted, paxticulaxly at Gxand and Audelo. Cominissionex Nash indicated that all developexs must pay school fees and indicated that the State of Califomia has control to where and when and school will be provided. He stated that with xegaxds to the teaffic signals, he stated that he believes that moxe access the bettex. He agreed that eithex a stop sign ox stoplight should be installed at Lincoln and Sunswept. Applicant Ellen Michiel indicated that she is open fox discussion with the City Engineex with plannuig a solurion fox that area. Community Development Dixectox Bxady asked the City Engineex to comment on that subject. City Engineer O'Donnell stated that stop signs axe not a good idea. He indicated that a txaffic study should be conducted at that paxriculax intexsection. He stated that speeding of caxs in that axea is an enfoxcement pxoblem and stop signs would not help the situation. He stated that a crosswalk in that axea is also dangexous. He stated that Lincoln would eventually go thxough almost to Lake Stxeet someday. He stated that someday the~ maybe a signal neax whexe the school is. He noted that txaffic is only going to get woxse on Lincoln. Conusussionex Nash stated that hearing this didn't make him feel any bettex. He stated that Foxecast Homes puts out an excellent pxoduct He stated that he is puzzled on what to do, and xealizes that we need some type of solution. He indicated that at this time, he had no fi~thez comments. Commissionex Uhhy noted that he is glad to heax that the TUMF Fees have been resolved. He stated that he is very concerned with the tsaffic. He indicated to all that he is glad to see 110 single- family homes in that axea, xather than 180 duplexes. He stated that it could be woxse. He noted that in the Mastex Plan fox the City, the City has to look at all diffexent kinds of homes, including the staxtex homes. He asked the Applicant how many 4,7001ots sizes axe pxoposed fox this pxoject. PAGE 10 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 Pxoject Plannex Donahoe indicated that the pxoject has appxoximately 16 lots less than 5,000 squaxe feet, which is 15% of the 110 lots. She stated that 55 lots aze 7,200 squaxe feet ox laxgex. Coinmissionex Uh1ry stated that 16 lots out of 110 axe not that many, and stated that they would be spxead out betcveen the pxoject, and not all on one stceet He stated that he is veiy concexned with the txaffic, especially when an emexgency vehicle needs to utilize the stxeet. He stated that he is in favox of having moxe than one access into the development. He noted that the CCR would xelate the HOA to maintain, and penalty would be implemented if a homeownex does not maintain theix yasd ox slope. Commissionex Uhlry had no fuxthex comments. Couiuiissionex LaPexe stated that the Plannuig Counnission's intent is not only to appxove a pxoject, but also to unpxove and incxease the unage of the City. He stated that the Conunission tries to keep that in mind when a decision is made. He commented that he has some issues with cextain Condirions that he would like addxessed. He asked about Condirion No. 29 whexe it discusses tubulax fencing. He asked if it would be tubulax, wooden ox a combinarion of both. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that it would depend on the lots. If it wexe a view lot, he stated, then it would be tubulax fencing. Commissionex LaPexe noted that the Applicant menrioned that the 16 lots that would be 4,700 squaxe feet would be used in the inside of the pxoject. He asked fox some claxification on that. Applicant Ellen Michiel stated that the only 4,700 squaxe foot lots that would be used on the outside of the pxoject, would be right at the entry whexe the model home paxk is located, and the balance would be in the intexiox. Commissionex LaPeze stated that he is in favox of Condirion No. 47 whexe it discusses a traffic signal at McVickex and Gxand and to be installed at the 40 cextificate of occupancy. He stated that he is not in favox of Condirion No. 48 whexe it discusses having a traffic signal at Audelo Street and Gxand Avenue. He suggested having the signal placed at Lincoln and Sunswept. Applicant Ellen Michiel stated that she would be happy to woxk with Staff to detexxnine what appxopriate tsaffic meas~es be taken at that locarion. Commissionex LaPexe stated he is in favox of Condition No. 60 as it xelates to the Hy~ology and Hydraulic repoxts to the County. He mentioned that he is concexned with the xemoval of the Oak txees in the axea. He stated that he would like to see that the Applicant do what evex is xeasonable to pxeseroe any Oak tree in that axea, even if it xequires moving the Oak teee to anothex locarion, or xeplace the txee. He asked if a teaffic signal at Audelo and Gxand changed to Lincoln and Sunswept. Applicant Ellen Michiel asked the Commissionex if ineant to have Condirion No. 48 changed PAGE 11 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 Coxrunissionex LaPexe stated that what he would like is to see if a traffic signal could be installed at Lincoln and Sunswept, vexsus Audelo and Gxand. He stated that a txaffic study could take 3 to 6 months to complete, and he does not want to have it dxagged out that long. Community Development Dixectox Bxady asked Comnvssionex LaPexe if he was xequesting that a traffic signal at Sunswept and Lincoln and not at Audelo and Gxand. Cotmnissionex LaPexe stated yes. Community Development Dixectox Bxady asked to have the City Engineex comment on this xequest City Engineex O'Donnell stated that the xeason that the signal placed at Audelo and Gxand was fox the safety of the schoolchildxen cxossing the street at that locarion. He stated that the City's Txaffic Engineex also agxees to that location. Cotsunissionex LaPexe asked if a signal could be placed at Lincoln and Sunswept in addition to the one at Audelo and Gxand. Cominissionex Uhlxy commented that this is the only phase that would be e~citing at Lincoln and Sunswept, and stated that 110 dwellings did not justify the cost ox the need fox a teaffic signal at that locarion. He suggested having a signal installed at McVickex and Gxand in addirion to the signal at Audelo and Gxand Avenue. He also xecommended changing the woxding on the Condirion to say instead of the 20 occupancy, but xathex as needed. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that without doing a pxojecrion of the pedestrian that would be cxossing at that locarion it would be haxd to detexxnine if that would be feasible. He stated that the school is xecommending having the signal installed at McVickex and Gxand xight away. Commissionex Uhhy pointed out that the school is not pxoviding any funds fox the signal. Coimnissionex LaPexe commented that the Coimnission possibly has a solution, and xequested that the Applicant considex it. He asked the Applicant how crirical would it be to the pxoject to open up Sunswept? Applicant Ellen Michiel stated that she has had that quesrion asked before. She stated that the Fire Depaxttnent has xecommended an access at that locarion and the City has conc~xed. Coxmnissionex LaPere asked the Applicant if Sunswept could be left alone. Commissionex Nash commented that in the oxiginal plan fox that axea, it shows an emergency access only. He asked the Applicant why couldn't it be left just as that. Applicant Ellen Michiel stated that it is a possibility. PAGE 12 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 Comnussionex Nash stated that it is a standaxd gated xoad. He stated that Sandpipex would be moxe congested. He asked why did they change the emexgency access to a complete access. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that because of the Townhouses that whexe pxeviously being considexed fox that axea, they did not want drivexs using that access as a shortcut to the paxking lot. Coimnissionex Nash asked if the xoad could be completed but have it gated. He asked if that woutd be possible. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that it would not be xecommended. Coininissioner Nash asked if undex these cixcuxnstances this might be a good idea because of the teaffic that would be going into McVickex, which would have a signal. City EngineeT O'Donnell stated that if anything; a teaffic signal would be needed at Sandpipex. Cotxunissionex Uhhy stated if the Fixe Depaxtment xecommends it, then it can not be changed. He stated that he would prefex to see two ways into the pxoject because of my pexsonal experience in f~e control. Commissionex LaPexe asked the Applicant if she spoke with the Fire Depaxtment and they stated that as long as they have an emexgency access they would be in compliance with an emexgency access in and out. Applicant Ellen Michiel stated yes. She stated that the F~e Depaxtment has xequested not to have the emexgency access gated. Howevex, she indicated. she may have a suggesrion. She stated that this suggesrion would be fox the Fixe Depaxtment and City Engineex xeview. She asked what if they wexe to pxovide a cul-de-sac both stYeets, allow about 20 feet of gxeen gxass space and pxovide a gxeen gxass xoad between the two. She stated that it would not be gated, but you would not likely to drive on it She stated that it would pxovide an ungated access and pxovide pxotecrion on both sides. Gity Engineex O'Donnell asked if you would be able to drive ovex the small c~b. Cominissioner Uhlry indicated yes. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that this could be done. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that he would like to ad~ess a few comments made about Tuscany Hills with xegasds to the lot size. He pointed out that Canyon Hills also has some small lots sizes, that axe smallex than the City's R-1 Standaxds. He stated that the smallest lot size is 4,500 squaxe feet., and yet Canyon Hills has won a numbex of awazds fox that development. He indicated that he believes a need fox a miY of housing units and Canyon Hills does allow that. As far as the teaffic issue, he indicated that the City would look into that as well as having an access at Sunswept and will have the Fixe Depaxtment address the emexgency access. He stated that Staff would also addxess Condirions No. 47 and 48, which discusses traffic signals. He indicated that the PAGE 13 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 HOA would be xesponsible to maintain the common axea and slopes pex pxoposirion 218. He also would like to xeitexate that the T[JMF Fees axe County's xesponsibility, howevex if the City of Lake Elsinoxe does not paxticipate the City would lose the measuxe "A" funds that was voted on xecendy. Community Development Dixectox Bxady had no fuxthex comments. Hearing no fuxthex comments, Commissionex LaPexe xequested the xeading of the Resolution, and closed the Public Hearing at 8:11 PM. MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-02, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF 7.AKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF T.AKR ELSINORE APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE LA LAGUNA ESTATES SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 92-4, LOCATED NORTH OF MCVICKER PARK AND WEST OF GRAND AVENUE AND LINCOLN STREET (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 391-260-040-047, 050, AND 051) WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS: #4. ~ ~ ~ . #5. Within four (4) weeks of City Council approval, the applicant shall prepa~e ten (10) copies of the frnal Amendment No. 1 to the La Laguna Specific Plan No. 92-4, which incorporates all approval items and exhibits rr! the Errata Sheets, and which complies with all applicable Conditrons ofApproval, includrrig the following: a. Appendrur C-DevelopmentAgreement, shallinclude a copyofthe executed FirstAmendment to the DevelopmentAgreementrecordedMay7, 2001, and the Table ofContents shall so note this addition. b. AppendiY D- Conditions of Approval, shall include these Conditions of Approval and the Conditions ofApproval for Tentat~ve Tract Map No. 30788, and the Table ofContents shall so note this additions. c. Section 5.3.7.1 - Walls and Fences, on Page 89, Second Sentence, shall be amended to read.• "Fencing between homes, along sideyards, and retums when viewed from public streets shall be ofstucco, slumpstone, sand, Spanish lace or smooth or flat fviish stucco consistent in treatment with the adjacent buildings." PAGE 14 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 d. Table 5- Plant Palette, Pages 61 through 68, shall remove reFerence to Oak trees as a street tree for this project, and another species approved by the City's Landscape Architect shall replace them. It is pemzissible to plant Oak trees as specimen trees. #6 Prror to the removal oF any mature Oak trees, the applicant shall bring a cer/rfred arborist onsite to evaluated said Oak trees for possible relocation and preservation. The applicant shall comply with the arborrst's recommendations in the event that the Oak uee can be successfullyrelocated and preserved. The adjacent Oak Tree Parkgrounds sha71 be considered as a relocation srte. Should the arborist recommend that said Oak trees shall instead be replaced at another site, the applicant sha/1 work with Planning Staff to deterrnr~le and appropriate replacement ratio, location and sizing of equal stature. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-03, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30788, LOCATED NORTH OF MCVICKER PARK AND WEST OF GRAND AVENUE AND LINCOLN STREET (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 391-260-040, AND A PORTION OF 391-2G0-047), A SUBDIVISION OF 47 ± ACRES INTO 110 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND TWO OPEN SPACE LOTS WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS: #5 The applicant shall work with the City Engineer and the Fire Department to redesign Sunswept Drive for use as an emergency access only, ungated, and landscaped throughway. #10 Construction on the pxoperty covered by this map is subject to all the Conditions of Approval of the La Laguna Estates Specific Plan, Amendments, and Tentative Parcel Map No. 30787, unless supecceded by these Conditions. #11 All lots shall comply with minimum standatds contained in the Development Standards approved with Amendment No. 1 to the La Laguna Estates Specific Plan No. 92-4. W~here these standards are silent Title 16 of the Lake Elsinoxe Municipal shall apply. #12 The applicant shall modify the location of the community Tcail to run along the east side of Open Space Lot "B" avoiding the undistutbed natuxal open space axea to the west. A revised Tentative Tiact Map No. 30788 shall be submitted to the Planning Department reflecting this change within two weeks of the City Council's approval of the tentative map. The applicant sha11 also extend the e~sting trail at then east end of PAGE 15 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 Oak Tree Park through Open Space Lot f°B" into the project site and connect to the easternmost street in the project. Drawings shall include a cross-section indicating the design as a 10-foot improved trail of decomposed granite within a 25 - foot dedicated easement. #20Arrangements shall be made betcveen the City and applicant far fiscal impacts by the project prior to issuance ofthe first building permit The applicant shall participate in a Cost Recovery Program or make other arrangements wrth the City to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety and maintenance issues in the City, includrng city-wrde improvements and facilitres relating to fire and police protection and maintenance ofroadways, etc. #ZSLandscape Plans for the tract shall include vegetative screening ofall retention basins. #31 Elevation drawings for Design Review shall include four-sided arclutectural features. #49 #50 #64Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Repoxts foi ceview and approval by City Engineer, and the Riverside County Flood Control District ifnecessary, pxior to approval of final map. Developex shall mitigated any flooding and/ot exosion caused by development of site and diversion of drainage. #81 The applicant shall provide a multi pur~iose norl-rrmotorized vehicle trail 10-foot wide with an easement twenty-ftve (25) feet wrde, landscape per City standards. The trail shall adjoin the existrrig Oak Tree Park Trail in comleting a continuous loop through this development. #82 The Homeoumers'Association for La Laguna Estates shall provide all maintenance of the trail system, all designated open space areas, all slopes, and medians and parkways in thepub&crrght-ofway. #83 7'he land comprising the trail shall be dedicated to the City in perpetuity. #84No credits for private recreation facilities designed or constructed within the development wlll be given. Private facilities shall be maintained by the HOA. #85A11 drairlage easement, drainage basrrls, catch basins, v-ditches and storm drains are to be mairttained by the HOA. PAGE 16 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 Planning Cointiussion took a five-minute xecess at 8:13 PM. Planning Coinmission reconvened the meeting at 8.21 PM. Chau7nan Baznes xejoined the meeting at 8:21 PM. 3. Conditional Use Permit No. 2002-11 and Commercial Ptoject No. 2002-03 "Washington Mutual Bankl. Cha~man Bames requested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt, and opened the Public Hearing at 8:23 PM. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that the pxoject befoxe the Planning Coinxnission is fox the Condirional Use Pernvt and Commexcial Design Review far the Washington Mutual Bank, and xequested Planning Managex AYmando Villa to ieview it with the Coinnussion. Planning Manager Villa stated that this pxoject would xequixe two acrions. One he stated is fox a Conditional Use Pernvt, which is puxsuant to secrion 030N of the C-1/SP Neighboxhood Commexcial Specific Plan Zoning of the Canyon Cxeek "Siuzunexhill Specific Plan xelating to dxive- thru establishments. He stated that in addirion to the CUP, he is xequesting an action be made fox the Commexcial Design Review p~suant to Section 100 of the Canyon Cxeek "Sumtnexhill" Specific Plan Chaptex and Secrion 17.82 (Design Review), of the LEMC. Planning Managex Villa indicated that this project is located cvithin the southwest coxnex of the intexsection of Summexhill Drive and Canyon Estates Drive. He stated that the pxoject is appxo~cimately 1.02 acxes and is Paxcel No. 1 of Paxcel Map No. 30830. He stated that the bank building totals appTOxixnately 4,844 squaxe feet of office space with appxoxixnately 1,368 squase feet of poxte-cochexe ovex the drive-thru. He noted that the pxoject pxoposes 40 paxking space including 2 handicap spaces and 13,200 squaxe feet of landscaped axeas. He stated that the bank would have two pximaiy dxiveway enuies off Canyon Estates Drive. Planning Managex Villa stated that the Planning Commission has I the past xecommended specific designs fox the dxive-d~u facilities. He stated axchitectuxal featuxes wexe used to the dxive-thru facility in the foxm of a poxte-cochexe type struct~e. He indicated that the Applicant would pxovide stacking space fox up to 8 vehicles. He stated that the last issue was to have the dxive-thru somewhat concealed fxom public view. He stated that this would be done by having extensive landscaping along Canyon Estates Dxive. Planniug Managex Villa stated that the axchitect~al design is consistent with the Spanish Mission morif that is xeflective of the suxxounding axeas. He indicated that the designs would include a tile xoof, wooden accent paxapet walls with tsellis accents, and decoxarive wiought ixon baxs. He stated that Staff has found that the pxoposed pxoject complies with the development standaxds of the Municipal Code and Genexal Plan Community Design Element. He stated that he xecommends PAGE 17 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 appxoval of the pxoject based on the Findings, Exhibits, and pxoposed Condirions of Appxoval. He stated that the applicant is pxesent fox any questions that the Coimnission may have. Chairman Barnes xequested the applicant to appxoach the podium. Applicant David Fxeeman, Axchitect fox PDG, 28407 Renee Drive, Ago~a Hills CA stated that he has xead and agxees with all of the Condiuons of Appxoval. Chaixman Bames requested any comments from the public. Heaxing no comments, questions wexe brought back to the Coimnission. Coimnissionex Nash had no questions fox the applicant. Conunissionex LaPexe stated that he liked the design of the bank and will enhance the axea. He had no fuxthex comments. Couztnissionex Uhlry asked the applicant if the all the utilities wexe going to be put undexground. Cotnmunity Development D~ectox Bxady stated that the utilities have akeady been installed. He indicated that the Code states that the utiliries would go undexgxound. He noted that this could be added to the Condirions of Appxoval. Couunissionex Uhlry suggested adding the standasd vexbiage using Condition No. 63. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that the Condirion was added to the Paxcel Map, but was left out fox this pxoject. Commissionex Uhlry had no fi~thex quesrions. Chairman Baxnes noted that the bank would have lock-up ATM's installed. He asked if this would be 24 ho~s. Applicant David Fxeeman stated that this is a xelatively new design will enable the ATM to be moved fxom the outside of the building. He stated that a tellex opexates the drive-thru, and will only be open d~ing business hoius. Cha.innan Barnes asked if a vault and safe-deposit boxes would be available. Applicant David Fxeeman stated "not at this location". Chaixman Basnes asked the City Engineex about Condirion No. 38 whexe it discusses the developex shall design and construct a txaffic signal at Summexhill Drive and Canyon Estates Dxive. He wanted to know when this would happen. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that he does not know of a date as of yet. PAGE 18 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 Chairman Baxnes asked the City Engineex about Condition No. 44 whexe it discusses the centexline of the private stseet be no moxe than 10 feet. He noted that the plans scale 15 feet, not 10 feet, and wanted to make s~e that this would be coxxected on the final plans. City Engineex O'Donnell noted the correcrion. Chavman Bames had no fuxthex comments, closed the Public Heaxing at 8:32 PM, and xequested the xeacling of the Resolutions. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-04, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF T.AKF' ELSINORE APPROVAL OF DESIGN REVIEW FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECT NO. 2002-03, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 4,852 SF BANK BUILDING TO BE LOCATED ON CANYON ESTATES DRIVE-PARCEL NO. 1 OF TPM NO. 30830. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OT THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-05, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF T"AKR ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, CUP NO. 2002-11 FOR A DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITY FOR WASHINGTON MUTUAL AS PART OF C 2002-03. BUSINESS ITEMS 4. Residential Pxoject No. 2002-10, "Trevira I& II Mitchell Development" Cominissionex LaPexe excused himself from hearing the pxoject due to conflict of intexest. Chaiunan Baxnes xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development D~ectox Bxady stated that the pxoject befoxe the Commission is a Design Review fox a Residenrial Pxoject located in the County Club Heights axea, and xequested Plannuig Managex Villa to ieview it with the Coimnission. Plannuig Managex Villa stated that is pxoject befoxe the Coimnission is fox the development of a Residential Pxoject consisting of 6 lots, 3 to be located on Wells Avenue and 3 lots on Tuxnbull Avenue. He stated that the Design Review is p~suant to Chaptex 17.82 and Chaptex 17.23 of the Lake Elsinoxe Municipal Code (LEMC). He indicated that Txevixa I would be located on Wells Avenue and Pope Cixcle and Txevixa II would be located on Turnbull Avenue and Gunnexson. PAGE 19 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 Planning Managex Villa stated that with xegaxds to Txevixa I thexe would be 3 diffexent plans. He stated that Plan one is 1,617 square feet, plan two is 2,048 squaxe feet and plan 3 is 2,340 square feet. He indicated that on Txevixa II they would be using the same plan 2 and 3. Plan one he indicated would not be used. He stated that these dwelling have been pxeviously appxoved by the Planning Coixux~ission as paxt of Residential Pxoject No. 2001-13. Planning Managex Villa stated that he xecommends that the Planning Commission adopt and appxove Residenrial Pxoject No. 2002-10, based on the Findings, Exhibits and is subject to the Condirions of Appxoval. He stated that the Applicant is pxesent fox any quesrions that the Commission may have. Chairnzan Baxnes xequested comments fxom the public. Tom Daly, Lake Elsinore stated that he is very unpxessed with this pioject and feels that this will help beautify the axea and will be a gxeat asset to the axea. Chaixman Baxnes asked if anyone else wished to speak fox ox against the project. Applicant Mike Mitchell, Developex fox Mitchell Development 31225 La Baya Drive, Wesdake Village, CA thanked Staff fox all thexe haxd woxk. He stated that he enjoys woxking with the xesidents of Lake Elsinoxe. He stated that he feels that thexe axe many oppoxtuniries in the County Club axea, and stated thatintxoducing this pxoject to the axea will be an asset. He indicated that he has a few issues with the Condirions of appxoval, as they do not apply to this pxoject and wanted to go ovex them with the Commission. He stated the following Condirions: Condition No. 8,would not apply, as it is a septic system in that axea. Condirion No. 11, block walls would be out of ch~acter fox that axea. Condirion No. 12, would not apply. Condirion No. 19, landscape plans have a~eady been submitted. Condirion No. 24, some of the buyers might pxefex natuxal wood colozed fencing. Condirion No. 25a, would not apply to take asea. Condirion No. 25c would like xemoved. Condirion No. 25d, not a model home complex. Condiuon No. 25f, would not apply. Condition No. 28, would not apply to that axea. Condition No. 36, would not apply to that area. Condirion No. 37, would not apply to that asea. Condirion No. 38, would not apply to that asea. Condirion No. 39, has nevex seen this type of Condition befoxe. Not suxe if they can construct a stoxm drain. Condirion No. 41, over kill fox 3 lots. Condiuon No. 42, would not consuuct a storm dxain. Condirion No. 44, would not apply. Condition No. 45, would not apply. Condirion No. 55, would not apply. PAGE 20 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 Condition No. 58, would not apply. Condition No. 60, duplicate. Applicant Mike Mitchell stated that the applications wexe submitted back in Novembex of this yeax. He stated that in the last 60 days he has had a chance to xe look at Wells and Pope Road 3 unit development. He indicated that when looking at it, it would be bettex to have the entry access off of Pope Cixcle instead of Wells Road. He stated that by doing this, we could impxove Pope Cucle with a 22 foot paved asphalt xoad and asphalt burm on both sides of the xoad. Cha~man Baxnes bxought the discussion back to the Convnission fox comments. Coxmnissionex Uhlry stated that he had no objecrions to flipping the houses and likes the idea of paving Pope to help with the ~ainage pxoblem. He indicated to the Applicant that these axe generic Conditions, and if they don't apply to youx pxoject, then you do not have to comply. He suggested that the City Engineex addxess the Conditions that discusses stoxm dxains. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that the drainage in that axea is a pxoblem. He stated that the azea is shaped like a bowl, and the watex does not ~ain. He noted that the azea floods, and that the Public Woxks Depaxtment during a rainy season, has to come up to the axea and pump the watex out and use sandbags. He stated that this would be a tough site to develop. He commented that putting up bnunes in the axea would not solve the solurion. He stated that the only solurion would be is to have a stoxm dxain put in. He noted that the cost fox a stoxm dxain would run anywhexe from 200,000 to 300,000 dollaxs. Comnvssionex Nash asked if Wells dxains down into Pope also. City Engineex O'Donnell indicated yes. Commissionex Nash indicated that the Applicant is a pioneex sort of to speak, and coming into this axea, and sometimes the pioneexs get stuck with most of the costs that might not seem xeasonable at the time, howevex m the futuxe will impxove the axea. He stated that he likes the looks of the plans, especially on Tuxnbull. He suggests to have the homes on Tuxnbull put up, and put a hold on the homes on Wells. He had no fuxthex comments. Chaixman Barnes asked Planning Managex Villa if the Applicant had a chance to xeview the Conditions of Approval priox to tomght's meeting. Planning Managex Villa stated yes, it was f~ed to him. Chairman Baxnes stated that thexe axe so many issues with the Condirions that it is not up to the Commission to make any judgments on any of the Condirions without further xeview and discussion cvith Staf£ He stated that thexe is too much in question without fi~thex xeview. Commissionex Uhlry concu~ed PAGE 21 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 Applicant Mike Mitchell xecommended to separate the two piojects as havmg a stomi dxain installed is not an option. He suggested having the homes on Wells put on hold and pxoceed with Turnbull's homes. Chautnan Baxnes asked the Applicant that the only issues with T~nbull would be Conditions Nos. 55, 56 and 58. The Applicant stated yes. Cha~man Baxnes asked the Coimnission what they felt about this Condirion. Commissionex Nash asked City Engineex about Condirion No. 55. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that Condiuon No. 55 is again a genexic Condirion. He indicated that they xnight need to have a stop b~ ox stop sign at Tuxnbull and Gunnexson. Cominissionex Nash asked about Condirion No. 56 and 58. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that those two Condirions would need to xemain. He stated that if the Applicant wexe doing any gxading then those Condirions would apply. Howevex, he indicated that he has not yet seen the plans. The Applicant stated that he has no pxoblem with those Condirions Community Development Dixectox stated that the fust 26 Condirions would apply to both sites, and would xemain xegaxdless. He stated that Condirions 47 thxu 65 would also xemain and delete Conditions 27 thxough 46. Planning Managex Villa stated that could appxove the pxoject as it stands, and any changes the Applicant could come back and amend his pxoject. Deputy City Attoxney Miles stated that the Applicant could take eithex appxoach. He stated that thexe appeaxs to be many unknowns. He stated that thexe appeaxs to be 3 pazcels with a lot of unknowns, and xecommends to split the pxoject. Cominissionex Nash asked the Applicant to appxoach the podium. He asked the Applicant if he appxoved to pxoceed with Tuxnbull and have the homes on Wells put on hold. The Applicant stated yes. Chaucnan Barnes asked the Comnussion fox any furthex comments. Thexe being no fi~thex comments, the Chaixman asked fox the xeading of the Resolurion. PAGE 22 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-OG, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2002-10, WHICH ENTAILS DESIGN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 3 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 378-254-002, 378-254-003 (TREVIRA II) WITH CONDITIONS NOS. 27 THROUGH 46 DELETED. Commissionex LaPere iet~ned to the meeting at 9:17 PM. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS NONE STAFF COMMENTS Community Development Dixectox Bxady commented on the following: • He stated that at the at the last City CouncIl meeting the CouncIl did appxove the expansion of the Study axea fox the County Clubs Heights. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chaixman Barnes commented on the followine: • He asked Community Development Dixectox Bxady what was happening with the Nuisance Abatement pxogxam. Community Development D~ectoT Bxady stated that it still needs to go befoxe the City Council and have a code amendment unplemented. He stated that he does not have a dated as of yet. • He wanted to thank Comnussioner LaPexe fox handling the La Laguna Estates project. Coxmnissiones LaPexe commented on the followin • • He was to thank Staff fox having the parients and undexstanding during this evening meeting and appxeciated all of the help. Commissionex Uhlry commented on the following PAGE 23 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 4, 2003 • He stated that Staff and the Cotiurussion did a good job this evening with the La Laguna Estates pxoject. Cominissionex Nash commented on the followin : • He wanted to thank evexyone who came to the meeting tonight and xealized that this was a tough meeting, but was glad to see that everything woxked out. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY NASH SECONDED BY LAPERE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 9:22 PM. BARNES, CHAIRMAN Respectfully Submitted, ~Ct/~ C ~ ~Q/j'C', Ai Dana C. Poxche' Community Development Clexk AT"I'EST: , obert A. Bxady, Secx to the Plannuig Conimissio MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET I.AKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 2003 The Regulax Planning Cou7inission Meeting was called to oxdex at 6:00 PM. by Chainnan Baines. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Coxrunissionex LaPexe. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Bt1RNES, MATTHIES, NASH, UHLRY, & LAPERE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Also present were: Community Development D~ectox Bxady, City Engineex O'Donnell, Community Development Technician Hennings, and Community Development Clexk Typist Poxche'. PUBLIC COMMENTS None CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY BARNES, SECONDED BY NASH AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO REVIEW THE MINUTES AT THE NEXT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. Minutes 1. Dxaft Minutes January 21, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS None PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 18, 2003 BUSINESS ITEMS 2. Minor Design Review of a Single Familv Residence located at 420 N. Scrivenex Street Chaixman Basnes xequested the xeading of the Staff Report. Community Development D~ectox Bxady stated that that item befoxe the Commission is a Design Review fox a Single Farnily Residence and xequested that Community Development Technician Hennuigs xeview it with the Coxsunission. Community Development Technician Hennings stated that this pxoject is fox a 2,629 squaxe foot two story home to include an 895 squaze foot attached gaiage. She indicated that the home would have thxee bedxooms, two baths and an attached deck on the second story. She stated that the applicant would pxovide fxont yard landscaping to include automatic spxinkler system and a stseet tree on the southwest coxnex. Community Development Technician Hennings indicated that the home would have off-white textuxed stucco with xeveals Txabuco Blend concxete tile far the xoofing. Community Development Technician Henniugs indicated that this pxoject meets all the rxuniinum xequirements of the Lake Elsinoxe Municipal Code (LEMC), and secommends the Planning Cominission adopt a Resolution based on the Findings, Exkubits, and Conditions of Approval. She stated that the applicant is pxesent to answex any quesrions that the Couuiussionexs may have. Chairman Baxnes asked the applicant if he has xead and agxees with the Conditions of Approval. Applicant Thomas Fzank, 22482 Walnut Drive, Wildomax CA stated that he has read and agxees to the Condirions of Appxoval. Chaixman Barnes xequested comments from the Cointnissionexs. Coxnmissionei Uhhy asked the applicant about the pxoposed abandonment on Flint Street, and does he agxee with this abandonment. Community Development Technician Hennings stated that the applicant xequested it. Comnussionex Uhhy asked the City Engineex to comment on this. City Engineex O'Donnell stated the applicant has xeceived pexmission from the othez pzopexty ownex whose pxopexty fxonts Flint Street. He stated that in oxdex to pxoceed, a Public Hearing would be necessary. Coinmissionex Uhhy had no fuxthex questions. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies asked the applicant what axe the plans far the noxth end of the home, as it looks plain. She also asked if the applicant plans to have a patio covex constructed. PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 18, 2003 The applicant stated that the home bardexs a hill, and thexefoxe a pario covex would not be necessaiy. He noted that he could add window accent txeatments so that the side of the home would not look so plain. Vice Chairwoman Matthies said, "That would be gteat." Community Development Directox BTady stated since the applicant a~ees to pxovide window txeatments, we will proceed with it, as it is not too cosfly. Vice Chaixcvoman Matthies had no furthex quesrions. Conuiussionex LaPexe conc~xed with the Coixunission. He stated that he likes the design, and had no quesrions fox the applicant. Commissionex Nash stated that he too liked the design and had no quesrions fox the applicant. Chairman Baxnes concurs with the Commissionexs and noted that the abandonment would need to have a Public Hearing and the City Council's appxoval. He had no questions fox the applicant. Thexe being no furthex quesrions, Chaixman Basnes xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY MATTHIES, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-07, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 420 N. SCRIVENER STREET (APN 374-033-001). INFORMATIONAL ITEMS NONE STAFF COMMENTS Community Develo~ment D~ectar Bxady commented on the following • He stated that a Study Session would be held on Febxuary 20 at 130 to discuss the City's Budget fox staffing. PAGE 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 18, 2003 PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chavrxian Baxnes commented on the following: He stated that he was disappointed to see that someone had vandalized Tuscany Hills Paxk. He indicated that aftex the zecent xains, someone dcove oveT the gxassy axea, up xooting the gxass, and turcung ovex the ttashcans. Vice Chairwoman Matthies commented on the followinQ: She stated that she has spoken with a Mx. Bill Fxuin who indicated that the constxucrion of new homes neax his house nevex completed the xetaining wall. She indicated that he said kids axe vandalizing the easement and wanted to know if thexe aie any plans fox a gate. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that the homes axe being built by Richmond American Homes, and the pxoject has not been completed. Commissionex LaPexe commented on the following: He asked the Community Development Directox Bxady if the positions fox City Staff have been filled. Community Development Dixectox stated that the City has appxo~nately eight positions that axe open, and the City is still in the pxocess of conducting inteiviews. He stated that the pxocess would still take some time to complete. Commissionex Uhlry commented on the following He had no comments. Comrnissionex Nash commented on the followinQ: He had no comments. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY MATTHIES SECONDED BY LAPERE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT G:21 PM. BARNES, CHAIRMAN PAGE 5- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - FEBRUARY 18, 2003 Respectfully Submitted, ~.,,~~. c ~ P~..~.j Dana C. Poxche' Community Development Clexk ATTEST: lYobext A. Bxady, Secxe to the Planning Cominissio MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET T •AKR ELSINORE, CA 92530 WEDNESDAY, MARCH 04, 2003 The Regulax Planning Coimnission Meeting was called to oxdex at 6:00 PM by Chav7nan Baenes. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Comnussionex Nash. ROLL C T.T• PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, NASH AND LAPERE MATTHIES, UHLRY Also present wexe Community Development Dicectoc Brady, Ciry Engineer O'Donnell, Associate Plannei Miller, and Community Development Clexk Typist Porche'. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY LAI'ERE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1a. Minutes of Planning Coxnnvssion Regulax Meeting - Febnxary 4, 2003 MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDARAS PRESENTED. 1b. Minutes of Plamiing Cotnnussion Regulaz Meeting - February 18, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Tentarive Paxcel Map No. 30302 and Mirigated Negarive Declaxarion No 2002-04. Chaiuuian Basnes opened the Public Heaxing at 6:04 PM and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MARCH 04, 2003 Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that this is a xequest fox a Tentarive Paxcel Map and Mirigated Negative Declaxarion fox a pazcel of land located off Highway 74, and xequested Associate Plannex Millex xeview it with the Couunission. Associate Plannex Millex stated that this pxoject is located at the eastexn boundary of the City at the coxnex of Centxal Avenue and Cambexn Avenue. She stated that access to the paxcels would be taken fxom a xecipxocal access driveway off Centxal Avenue and Cambem Avenue. She indicated that the applicant has xequested to subdivide 13.8 acxes of vacant land into 10 commexcial paxcels; howevex, she indicated that only six of the paxcels axe allowed to be developed at this time. She stated that paxcels 7 tl~ough 10 axe to be avoided until a xeplacement habitat fox the blue hexon is found, ox the ownex may seek an alternarive mitigation that is a~eed upon by the City and the US Depaxtment of Fish and Game. Associate Plannex Millex stated that Condirion No. 31 has been changed and appxoved by City Engineex O'Donnell and the applicant. She indicated that an exrox was made in the Staff Repoxt whexe it discusses the City Boundaiy and City Zoning and would coxxect the exxox. Associate Planner Millex indicated that she is xecommending appxoval of the Tentarive Paxcel Map No. 30302 and Mitigated Negarive Declaxarion No. 2002-04 based on the Findings, Exhibits, and Conditions of Appxoval. She stated that the applicant is present and would be available to answex any quesrions that the Commission may have. Chavtnan Baxnes xequested the applicant appxoach the podium fox questions and coxnments. Lazry Maxkham, 41635 Enteiprise Cixcle Noxth, Suite B, Temecula CA 92590 indicated that he is xepxesenting the applicant and has xead and agxees with the Condirions of Appxoval to include the modificarion to Condirion No. 31. He indicated that the ownexs fox the pxoject whexe pxesent to answex any quesrions that the Commission may have. Thexe being no fizxthex comments fxom the public, Chaixman Baxnes bxought the discussion back to the Coisunission fox comments. Coixuiussionex LaPexe asked Community Development Dixector Bxady if it is waxxanted to have a signal installed at the intexsection of Highway 74 and Cambexn, would the County of Rivexside help fund the costs fox the signal. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that the County does not have any pazticiparion whexe the signal is to be located. Commissionex LaPexe had no fuxthex quesrions. Coxxunission Nash liked the pxoject and had no quesrions fox the applicant. Chairtnan Bames concuxxed with the Cointnissionex and had no quesrions fox the applicant. PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MARCH 04, 2003 Thexe being no f~thex quesrions, Chaixman Baznes closed the Public Heaxing at 6:12 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Resolutions. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CERTIFICATION OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2002-04. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF I.AKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 30302 WITH THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO CONDITION NO. 31: #31 Applicant shall submit a focused traf&'c study prior to obtaining Plar:vrlig Comnzission approval of Design Review for any commercial burldings. The study will determine if a traffic signal is warxanted at the intetsection of SR74 and Cambexn Street. The waxrant study shall be based on present counts and on projected counts to the yeac 2005. A traffic signal shall be installed if waxrants are met or if in the detecmination of the City Engineer, safety considetations at the intexsection wartant the installation of the traffic signal. The developer's cost for the traffic signal will be credited against the traffic mitigation fee. BUSINESS ITEMS None INFORMATIONAL STAFF COMMENTS Community Development D~ectox commented on the follow~. • He indicated that Staff inembex Community Development Technician Hennings is curxendy puxsuing hex Bacheloxs Degtee in Public Adnunistsarion, and has requested to video tape a Planning Coimnission Meeting as part of hex Public Speaking class. • He stated that the La Laguna Estates pxoject went befoxe the last City Council meeting and passed unannnously to include the emexgency assess at Sunswept Dxive. PAGE 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MARCH 04. 2003 PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chauman Baxnes commented on the followin~: • He had no comments. Commissionex LaPexe commented on the followine: • He thanked Community Development Clexk Typist Porche' on her excellent wark completing the Februaiy 4, 2003 minutes. Commissionex Nash commented on the followin~: • He had no comments. ADjOURNMENT MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 6:19 PM. BARNES, CHAIRMAN Respectfiilly Submitted ~r,~. C . ~o~ ,CQ' Dana C. Poxche' Community Development Clexk ATTEST: ~ obext A. Bxady, Secxeta to the Planning Commission MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET T.AKR ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, MARCH 18. 2003 The Regulax Planning Commission Meeting was called to oxdex at 6:07 PM by Commissionex LaPexe The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Cotiuxussionex Uhhy. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: LAPERE, UHLRY, AND NASH ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES AND MATTHIES Also pxesent were Community Development Director Bxady, Deputy Attoxney Miles, Planning Manager Villa, Senior Planner Moxita, Associate Plannex Miller, City Engineer O'Donnell, and Community Development Clerk Typist Poxche'. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. Minutes of Plannuig Coxrunission Regulac Meeting - Maxch 4, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Conditional Use Permit No 2003-01 and Industrial Project No. 2002-06 Couiinissionex LaPexe opened the Public Heazing at 6:08 PM and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development D~ectox Bxady indicated that this is a xequest fox the Plannuig Comnussion to continue this item to Apxi12, 2003. Commissionex LaPexe closed the Public Hearing at 6:11 PM and xequested a mouon. PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MARCH 18, 2003 MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO HAVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-01, AND INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. 2006-06 CONTINUED TO THE NEXT REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON APRIL 1, 2003. 3. Conditional Use Permit No, 2002-08 and Industxial Pxoiect No. 2002-05. Commissionex LaPexe opened the Public Hearing at 6:12 PM and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development D~ectox Bxady indicated that this is a xequest fox a Condirional Use Pexmit and Industxial Pxoject fox a stoxage facility, and xequested Planning Managex Villa to xead the Staff Repoxt. Plannuig Managex Villa indicated that this pxoject is fox a self mini-stoxage facility and the othex is for the xecommendarion fox approval to the City Council fox the Design Review of an industsial building. He stated that the pxoject site is located a quaxtex of a tnile noxthwest of Colliex and Spxing Stxeet. He stated that the stoxage facility would include a 1,719 squaxe foot office and a 1,580 squaxe foot caxetakex's living qu~texs and a tcvo-cax gaxage. Plannuig Manager Villa stated that the pxitnaxy access would be off Colliex Avenue and the secondary access fox emexgency would be off Minthoxn Stxeet. He stated that 10% of the land would be landscaped. He commented that the pxoject would have appxoxitnately 454 stoxage units, eight paved paxking spaces, to include one handicapped paxking space, and two gazaged paxking spaces. Planning Managex Villa stated that the design of the building would foxm a"foxtress-like" design to include metal xoofing, stone-like coinices, and decoxarive fencing. He stated that the design of the pxoject meets and exceeds City's Design Standaxds. Plannuig Managex Villa xecommends that the Planning Coinmission adopt a Resolurion appxoving the Conditional Use Permit and xecommends to the City Council appxoval of the Industxial Design Review, based on the Exhibits, Findings and subject to the Condirions of Appxoval. Planning Managex Villa indicated that the applicant is pxesent fox any questions that the Commission may have. Cotntnissionex LaPexe requested any comments fxom the Public. Floyd Jackson 23987 Continental Drive, Canyon Lake, CA. stated that he owns a small stsip of land neax the pxoject and would like to know the status of escxow. John Pxeviri, applicant fox the pxoject state that the pxoject is cuxxendy in escxow and would be closing this week. PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MARCH 18, 2003 Commissionex LaPexe xequested any other comments from the Public. Thexe being no fixxthex comments, Cominission LaPexe closed the Public Heaxing and xequested comments from the Coizuirission. Coimnissionex Nash stated that he liked the design of the pxoject, and had no fuxthex comments. Counnissionex Uhlry stated that he is very impxessed with the design. He asked the applicant if he has xead and agxeed to the Conditions of Appxoval. John Pxeviri stated that he has iead and agxees to the Condirions of Appxoval. Coininissionex LaPexe had no comments. Thexe being no f~thex comments, Commissionex LaPexe requested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY NASH SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-10, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, CUP NO. 2002-08 FOR A SELF MINI-STORAGE FACILITY, WITHIN M-1 ZONING APN 377-190-010. MOVED BY NASH SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-11, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. 2003-05 TO BE LOCATED ON COLLIER AVENUE AND MINTHORN STREET - APN 377-190-010. 4. Residential Pxoject No. 2003-01, Design Review of Proposed Lake Elsinore Triplex Pcoject and Variance No. 2003-01. Coxsunissionex LaPexe opened the Public Hearing at 6:27 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development D~ectox Bxady indicated that this is a xequest fox a Residential Design Review and requested Seniox Plannex Morita to xeview it with the Commission. Seniox Plannex Morita stated that the item befoxe the Commission is a Residential Design Review of a 54 unit triplex complex to be located on 18 sepaxate lots. He stated that the pxoject is located east of Machado Street, off Woodcxest Drive and Paxkview Place. PAGE 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MARCH 18, 2003 He stated that the second pxoject is a Variance to allow project compliance with the City's Zoning Code's standaxd relating to the nriniinum lot size fox triplex units. Seniox Plannex Moxita indicated that in 1982, the City appxoved Txact No. 16452, which subdivided 10 acxes along Woodcrest Dxive and Paskview Place into 32 legal lots. He stated that in 1985 the City appxoved Condirional Use Permit 85-3, which allowed 4-plex units to be constructed on the 321ots. He stated that the applicant at that time gxaded and improved the entixe azea, and constructed 4-plex units on 12 of the 32 lots. Seniox Plannex Morita stated that the design of the pxoject would be two stories to include two cax gaxages. He indicated that each would have the~ own sepaxate entry. He stated that plan 1 and 2 would have thxee bedrooms and plan 3 would have foux bedxooms. He noted that the building's exteuox would be Spanish Mission-style axchitecture with stucco, painted with tan and off-white coloxs. He stated that the units would have a moxe vasied xoof design utilizing shuttexs, pot shelves, and suxxound foam to enhance the windows. Senior Plannex Moxita stated that the only issue xelating to the pxoject would be the conflict with a paxriculax standasd contained in the City's Zoning Code. He stated that the Zoning Code states that the minim~ lot axea fox each dwelling shall be 3,630 square feet. He indicated that 14 of the 18 lots do not comply with this standaxd. He stated that a Vaxiance is being proposed to addxess the mi.,imum lot size. Seniox Plannex Moxita xequested that the Planning Coinmission adopt a Resolution to appxove Vaxiance No. 2003-01 and recoxnmend to the City CouncIl the Residential Pxoject No. 2003-01 based on the Exhibits, Findings, and Condirions of Appxoval. Seniox Plannex Morita stated that he has xeceived two lettexs, one dated Masch 14, 2003 fxom Dan Huntex, an attoxney xepresenting the oxiginal developex Petex Fenton, and the second is fxom Petex Fenton dated Mazch 14, 2003. Coimnissioner LaPexe xequested comments from the Public. Bevexly Gibson lives in the Machado Pines Estates, behind the proposed pxoject. She indicated that once the pxoject is constructed, that she will lose the view to the lake. She indicated that she knew someday, something would be built on the land, but she wanted to voice hex opuuon. Chuck Txeatch, applicant fox RaeBxooke Homes thanked the Staff fox all the haxd woxk that has been put into this pxoject He stated that he agxees to the Condirions of Appxoval. He indicated that he xeceived copies of the tcvo lettexs and indicated that RaeBxooke Homes would not be using any of theix plans ox modificarions. Thexe being no fuxthex comments, Commissionex LaPexe closed the Public Hearing at 630 PM and xequested comments fxom the Commission. Cotsunissionex Uhlxy asked the applicant if they wexe going to just use the Txact Map with the street lay out. PAGE 5- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MARCH 18, 2003 The applicant stated "yes." He indicated that the oxiginal plans wexe fox four-plexes, not tsiplexes. Commissionex Uhlry stated that he is having a difficult time tsying to undexstand what Mx. Petex Fenton is implying to. Deputy Attorney Miles stated that he would xeview the lettexs that are in the xecoxd, and the City Attomey would follow up to see if thexe is any additional infoxmation that may be applicable to this issue. Applicant Chuck Txeatch indicated that they would not be using the e~sting bonds, and would be putting up new bonds fox the pxoject. Commissionex Uhlxy had no fiicthex quesrions. Commissionex Nash asked Seniox Plannex Morita if the lettexs that wexe xeceived wexe any concexn of the Planning Cominission. Seniox Plannex Morita stated "no." Commissionex Nash asked if the~ would be an HOA and what would happen if the applicant decided to sell the units. Planning Managex Villa indicated that Condirion No. 8 states that if the txiplex units axe sold that the applicant shall establish a HOA, which would be incorpoxated into any ride xepoxt, pxiox to cextificate of occupancy. Commissionex Nash had no fuxthex comments. Coininissionex LaPexe asked if the ~iplex units axe sold and an HOA is established to maintain the pxoject, does that mean the entise pioject. Community Development D~ectox Bxady indicated that it would be fox the entixe project. Coxmnissionex LaPexe had no fi~thex questions. Thexe being no fi~thex quesrions, Com~nissionex LaPexe xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY UHLRY SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-12, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF T.AKF' ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 2003-01 TO ALLOW REDUCTION OF THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE REQUIREMENT FOR THE PROPOSED LAKE ELSINORE TRIPLEX COMPLEX LOCATED ALONG WOODCREST DRIVE AND PARKVIEW PLACE. PAGE 6- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MARCH 18, 2003 MOVED BY NASH SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-13, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF T.AKF. ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. 2003-01 DESIGN REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED LAKE ELSINORE TRIPLEX COMPLEX. BUSINESS ITEMS 5. Residential Pioject No. R 2002-08, Ttuee Single Family Residences. Community Development D~ectox Bxady indicated that this is a xequest fox a Design Review fox the development of thxee Single Family Residences and xequested Associate Plannex Millex to xeview it with the Commission. Associate Plannex Millex stated that this is a Design Review considexation fox the development of thxee single-fatnily xesidences to be located within the Historic Elsinoxe Ovexlay Disteict. She stated that each paxcel would be 9,000 squaxe feet and the applicant pxoposed to place a pxe-manufactuxed unit on each lot. She stated that each unit would be 1,615 squaxe feet and would include a kitchen, nook, thxee be~ooms, 2 bathxooms, and a utility xoom and include a detached 400 squase foot gaxage. Associate Plannex Millex stated that Staff has woxked very hasd to achieve the intent of the Histoxic Elsinoxe Architectural Design Standaxds. She indicated that these homes meet the intent of the Historic Standaxds. She stated that the homes pxovide the elements of a 1920 Craftsman type structuxe to include a large poxch with ovexsized pillazs and xailings. She indicated that the plans would pxovide sevexal vzsiations of wall plans and changes in xooflines. Associate Plannex Millex stated that this pioject meets all of the LEMC xequ~ements and is exempt from CEQA. She stated that Staff xecommends that the Planning Cotmnission adopt a Resolurion based on the Findings, Exl~ibits and subject to the Conditions of Appxoval. Associate Plannex Millex indicated that the applicant is pxesent fox any quesrions that the Corrunission may have. Cotrunissionex LaPexe xequested that the applicant appxoach the podium. Maxshall Inuuis, 479 Ocean Avenue, Laguna Beach, CA stated that Staff and hixnself have worked out all the issues, and feels that this is a gxeat pxoject fox the City. Corrunissionex Nash stated that he likes the design and feels that the homes would blend in well with that asea. Cotiunissionex Nash had no fi~thex questions. Cotsunissionex Uhlxy asked the applicant if he agtees to the Conditions of Appxoval. PAGE 7- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MARCH 18, 2003 Maxshall Ininns indicated "yes." Comnussionex Uhhy asked the applicant if trash enclos~es would be included in the plans. The applicant stated "yes." Coxmnissionex Uhlry had no fuxthex questions. Cominissionex LaPexe stated that one of the concexns that the Commission has had in the past, is that manufactared homes do not meet ox exceed the builcling of a single residence within the same locarion. He stated that he undexstands that the applicant has woxked very haxd with Staff to achieve t6is and appreciates the haxd woxk. There being no f~thex comments, Commissionex LaPexe xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY UHLRY SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2002-08 FOR THREE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES LOCATED AT POE STREET AND FLINT STREET APN - 374- 052-001, 002, 003. INFORMATIONAL STAFF COMMENTS Community Development D~ectox commented on the following. • He indicated that on Thursday Maxch 20 thexe would be a Study Session with the City Council to discuss TUMF Fees. • He stated that at the last City Council meeting City Council appxoved to have the City's citarion pxogxam revised, which would benefit the City's Code Enfoxcement. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Commissioner Nash commented on the followine: • He indicated that he would not be able to attend the Study Session on Thuxsday. PAGE 8- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MARCH 18, 2003 Commissionex Uhlry commented on the following; He stated that he has some concexns with the gxading that is cuxxendy being conducted on Sisth Street between Mill and Pask. He stated that the pexson is using his f~ont yaxd fox the fill and is cxeating a deep hole that could be veYy dangexous to anyone who could fall into the hole. Community Development Dixectox Brady stated that he would norify Code Enfarcement iininediately. He stated that he is very unpxessed with the design of the self-storage and of the single- family xesidences that wexe discussed tlvs evening. Commissionex LaPexe commented on the followinP: He stated he is concerned the TUMF Fees might slow down development in the City. He xequested that the Genexal Plan be xeviewed at the next Planning Coimnission, as it has been several yeaxs since the last Genexal Plan was updated. ADjOURNMENT MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY NASH AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT G:55 PM. ~ RON LAPERE, COMMISSIONER Respectfixlly Submitted ~ CP~~~~~ Dana C. Poxche' Community Development Clexk ATTEST: ~obext A. Bxady, Secietary to Planning Coimi7ission MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, APRIL 1, 2003 The Regulaz Planning Coxsuzrission Meeting was called to oxdex at 6:00 PM by Chaiunan Bames. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Cominissionex LaPexe. ROLL C T.T. PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES AND MATTHIES LAPERE, UHLRY, AND NASH ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Also present wece Commuxuiy Development Director Brady, Deputy Attorney Miles, Plamiiug Manager Villa, Associate Planner Miller, City Engineer O'Donnell, and Community Development Technician Hennings. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDARAS PRESENTED. 1. Minutes of Planning Coinuiission Regulax Meeting - Maxch 18, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Termination of Development Agreement dated Febmary 28, 1997, between the City of Lake Elsinore and Fitst Financial Group, Inc. Chaiuzian Barnes opened the Public Hearing at 6:04 PM and xequested the xeading of the Staff Report. Community Development Dizectox Bxady indicated that this is a xequest fox the teunuiarion of the Development Agreement between the City of Lake Elsinoxe and Fixst Financial Gxoup, Inc., which was adopted on Januaiy 28, 1997. He stated that as a xesult of the New PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 1, 2003 Setdement Agxeement, Fixst Financial Gxoup Inc. xeleased any rights ox intexest to acqu~e oi develop the Agency Pxopexty. He indicated that because a Development Agxeement is a legislarive act, teuiunation of a Development Agxeement must be accomplished by an oxdinance. He commented that the Govexnment Code fixxthex xequ~es that notice of intention to cancel a Development Agxeement be given in accoxdance with the Public Hearing notice requixements set foxth in Govexnment code 65090 and 65091 and that these xequitements include a noriced Public Hearing by the Planning Cointivssion. Community Development Directox Bxady stated that Staff xecommends that the Planuing Coinuiission xecommend to the City CouncIl to adopt an Oxdinance xepealing Oxdinance No. 1024 and pxoviding fox the teiminauon of the Development Agxeement with the Agency, as successox in intexest to F~st Financial Group, Inc. Chautnan Barnes xequested comments for the Public. Hearing no comments, Cha.uinan Barnes brought the discussion back to the table fox Cominissionexs comments. Commissionex Uhhy asked if the 80 acxes would be paxt of the new a~eement later on. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that the aTea in discussion would be available fox development at some time. Commissionex Uhlry had no f~thex comments. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies had no comments. Coimnissionex LaPexe had no comments. Coinmissioner Nash had no comments. Chaixman Barnes asked if Fixst Financial was obtauiuig the pxopexty. Community Development Dixectoz Bxady indicated that the pxopexty is no longex available, and xequested Deputy Miles to comment furthex. Deputy Miles stated that the puxchase and sell agteement had sevexal Condirions that pxeceded that actual tsansaction the p~chase of sale of that pxopexty and thtough setdement with Fixst Financial Gxoup, it was agxeed by FFG that all rights would xemain with an agency. Chautnan Baxnes had no fuxthex comments closed the Public Hearing at 6:09 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Resolution. PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 1, 2003 MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL TERMINATION OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AND FIRST FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. 3. Development Agreement between DEH, LLC a California Limited Liability Corpocation and the Citv of Lake Elsinore. Chainnan Barnes opened the Public Heaxing at 6:10 PM and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Directox Bxady indicated that this is a xequest fox a Development Agxeement in connection with a pxoposed Commexcial Development on and up to 68 acxes of land located neas the noxtheast cornei of Intexstate 15 and Highway 74. He stated that the applicant has xequested a Development Agxeement to vest the land use designations, development standaxds, and fees fox the 68-acxe axea. Community Development DixectoT Bxady indicated that he would like to make a few corrections to the Findings that wexe noted in the Staff Repoxt. The fixst coxxecrion would be to No. 3 of the Findings. He stated that it should xead, "The development agxeement is in confoxmity with public convenience, genexal welfaxe and good land use pxactices." He stated that the next coxxection would be to No. 5 of the Findings. He stated it should xead, "The development agreement will not advexsely affect the oxderly development of pxopexty of the pxeseroarion of propexty values." Chairnzan Bames xequested comments fox the Public. Hearing no comments, Chainnan Baxnes bxought the discussion back to the table fox Commissionexs comments. Coimnissionex Nash had no comments. Coxsunissionex LaPexe asked what would happen if the applicant wanted to develop the land one week befoxe the deadline ends. Community Development D~ectar Bxady indicated that pxovide that the applicant has pulled all of the necessuy pernuts, and complies with the Design Review, then it would still be appxoved. Cominissionex LaPeLe had no fuxthet comments. Coinnussionex Uhlxy stated that he likes the escalarion of fees as time elapses. PAGE 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 1, 2003 Vice Chaixcvoman Mattlues had no comments. Chaiunan Barnes asked what aie the downsides for the City. Community Development Disectox Bxady stated that the~ ase fees involved that the City would get fox this a~eement. He indicated that it does fxeeze the standaxds and new fees could be assessed. Chairinan Barnes had no fiixdzex questions, closed the Public Heaxing at 6:20 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AND DEH, LLC., FOR UP TO G8 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF INTERSTATE 15 AND HIGHWAY 74. Plamiuig Couiinission took a five-minute xecess at 6:20 PM. Planning Coimnission xeconvened the meeting at 6:36 PM. 4. Development Agreement between Uxban Pacific Buildexs, a Califomia Limited Liability Cotporation and the Citv of Lake Elsinore. Chairnzan Bames excused hnnself fxom tUis poxtion of the meeting due to conflict of intexest and xequested Vice Chauwoman MattUies lead the discussion dwing his absence Vice Chaiiwoman Matthies opened the Public Hearing at 636 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Report. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that this is a xequest fox a Development Agzeement in connection with a pxoposed single-family development that consists of appxoxunately 75.2 acxes of vacant land located in the East Lake Specific Plan. He stated that the implementarion of a development agxeement would xeduce the economic risk associated with development of the pxopexty. He noted that the applicant would pay the City a Development Agxeement Fee in accoxdance with the pTOVisions of the development agxeement fox the benefit of vesting theix development xequixements. Community Development Dixectox Brady stated that the agreement would be fox five years, and the pxoposed fee of $3,000 pex unit. He indicated that again he would like to make a few coxxecrions to the Findings that wexe noted in the Staff Report. PAGE 5- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 1, 2003 The fixst coxxecrion would be to No. 3 of the Findings. He stated that it should xead, "The development agxeement is in conformity with public convenience, genexal welfaxe and good land use pxactices." He stated that the next coxxecrion would be to No. 5 of the Findings. He stated it should xead, "The development agxeement will not advexsely affect the oxdexly development of pxopexty of the pxeseroarion of pxopexty values." Community Development D~ectox Bxady stated that the applicant is present to answex any quesuons that the Commission may have. He also noted that some changes have been made on the Development Agxeement and would go thxough them with the Coimnission. He stated f~st change would be on section 3.2 page 6 of 21 of the Development A~eement. He stated that it should xead, "The land uses pemutted on the Pxopexty include all of the allowable land uses permitted by the Genexal Plan & East Lake Specific Plan fox xesidential development. He stated the next change would be on secrion 4.7 page 9 of 21 of the Development Agxeement. He stated that it should xead, "The City finds that ultimate development of the Pxopexty in xeliance upon the East Lake Specific Plan and xesidenrial uses." He stated that a new secrion has been added about MSHCP and that would be secrion 4.9 and a new secrion would be added fox Public safety and that would be 4.10. Deputy Attoxney Miles indicated no othex majox xevisions. Vice Chavwoman Matthies xequested comments fxom the public, and indicated that the pi~pose of tonight's Public Heaxing was to pxesent the Development Ag~eement only, and not to address the Design Review. Bob Fallon, 12235 El Caisuno Real, San Diego, CA. wanted to thank Staff fox theix effoxts on handling this mattex in a timely effoxt. He indicated that he would be able to hear and answex any questions that the public may have. Doug Connelly, 32485 Beechwood Lane, Lake Elsinoxe, CA. asked if Skylaxk would be continued thxough to Gxand Avenue, and also wanted to know about the apaxhnents that wexe mentioned. Phyllis A. Lellxna, 32425 Skylazk Drive, Lake Elsinoxe, CA asked what the defuution of an open space passive pask is and what type of playground facilities would be pxovided fox the chil&en. She also wanted to know what types of homes axe taxgeted fox the axea, would they be compaxable to the e~sting homes, and how would the addirional homes affect the teaffic. Lasdy, she indicated that thexe axe many coyotes in the axea. She asked if the buildex intends on relocating them to a safe axea for pzotection. Bob Magee, 32400 Beechwood Lane, Lake Elsinoxe, CA. indicated that he is in favox of development in this axea, howevex is against the Development Agreement fox this pxoject. He indicated that he would support the document as long as changes axe made. He wanted PAGE 6- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 1, 2003 to thank Coimnissionex Uhhy and Community Development Bxady far theix considexarion on the amendments that wexe made this evening with the language of Genexal Commexcial deleted from the Agxeement, and xequiriYng the developex to participate in the public safety community facilities disirict, which would add addition funding fox police and fixe pxotecrion. He asked that the Development Agreement be modified to name only Uxban Pacific Buildexs as the vested paxty and that all othexs be excluded from this agreement He asked that theix axe to be no successoxs ox assignees to this agxeement. He stated that if Urban Pacific intenrions axe to develop this pxopexty, then they should have no objecrion to this change. He also asked that the applicable nile secrion 3.2 be amended to include compliance with the City's nuisance oxdinance and that undeT item no. 6.1 view of compliance that the City's annual plans xeview include an inspecrion of the pxopexty to verify compliance. He stated that this pxoject does not comply with the City's nuisance oxdinance now, and xequested that the builder clean up the pxoperiy befoxe it comes back to the City CouncIl. He noted that the pending Tentarive Txact Map 30846, and that the Coinmission should instruct the developer and Staff to caxefully consider the lot sizes on Skylaxk Avenue, acrive and impxoved paxk faciliries and police and fue depasttnent access. Bob Fallon stated that he would like to construct a neighboxhood foxuxn to go ovex all the issues with the residents in the asea. Thexe being no fixxthex comments ~om the public, discussion was bxought back to the table fox Coimnissionexs coxnments. Counnissionex Uhhy asked Staff about the development fees of $3,000 pex unit staggexed. Conunissionex Nash asked if the $3,000 per unit would be paid all at once, ox when the perxnits wexe to be pulled. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that the fees axe payable at the rime that the buildex pulls a permit. Commissionex Nash noted that the buildex would have to pay almost $700,000 in fees at full development. Coininissionex Uhlry noted that the buildex would be saving in TUMF Fees, which axe to begin June 1, 2003. He asked Bob Fallon if he intends on building the pxoject in phases. Bob Fallon indicated "yes." Cotiuivssionex Uhiry asked if by making this a single-family pxoject, does this rule out mulri- fatnily homes. Comtnunity Development Dixectox stated that this is being based on the development of the entixe site of single-family units. He stated that a poxrion of the axea would allow for a highex density xesidential development. PAGE 7- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 1, 2003 Comtnissionex Nash stated that he appxeciated the turn out of residents voicing theix opinion on the pTOject He indicated that at this time, the Coisunission is just xeviewing the Development Agxeement, and not the design of the homes. He had no fi~thex quesrions. Coimnissionex LaPexe indicated that the Coininission has teceived a few lettexs xegazding the Development A~eement and indicated that they would be entered into the Public Record. He stated that one lettex in paxriculax was received from N~. Moon, and hoped that Ivlr. Moon is pxesent at tonight's meeting. He indicated that he has been involved with the City fox many yeaxs, to include spoxt activities with his childxen. He stated that it is unpoxtant for hitn as a xesident of the community to have continued f~e, police, and safety pxotecrion. He stated that he is listening to the public's concerns, and will considex all. He stated that he is please to see that the applicant is willing to meet with the xesidents that have concerns with the pxoject He asked the public that if they wish to discuss this fuxthex with him, that he would be available by phone oz they can wxite to him. He had no fi~thex comments. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies concuxxed with the othex Coiiuiussionexs. She indicated that it might be a good idea aftex tonigh~s meeting that Mx. Fallon meet the tonigh~s xesidents and set up a meeting to discuss it fi~thex. Thexe being no fuxthex questions, Vice Chairwoman closed the Public Heaxing at 7:11 PM xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY UHLRY SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-17, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF T.AKF. ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AND URBAN PACIFIC BUILDERS LLC. TTM 30846 Chaixxnan Barnes xeuuned to the Planning Coinmission Meeting at 720 PM. 5. Variance No. 2003-02, Conditional Use Permit No. 2003-01, and Industrial Project No. 2002-06, P&M Land Ventures. Cha.unian Barnes opened the Public Heaxing at 7:20 and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that the item befoxe the Coxxunission was continued from the last Planning Coixunission. He indicated that the pxoject being considexed is a Variance, Condirional Use Pexmit and Industrial pxoject cvith P&M Land Ventares, and tequested that Planning Managex Villa xeview it with the Coiiunission. Plazniing Manager Villa stated that this Tequest is for appxoval of a Variance that would allow xeducrion in paxking xequ~ements puxsuant to Secrion 17.76 and Section 167.66.030.C 1&2 of the LEMC. He stated that in addirion to the Vaxiance a CUP is necessary fox the establishment of an outdooz stoTage within the Limited Manufactuung M-1 Zoning District. PAGE 8- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 1, 2003 Planning Managex Villa stated that the pxoposed Design Review fox the Industrial pxoject consists of two industrial buildings that totals 27,120 squaxe feet. He stated that the pxoject is located '/< of a mile narthwest of intexsecrion of Colliex Avenue and Spring Street. He indicated that of the two buildings, building A would be 16,120 squaxe feet and building B would be 1,108 squaxe feet. He stated that 7,500 square feet would be landscaped, wl~ich is appxoxunately 10% of the site. He commented that the facility would have 31 paxking spaces pxovided. He stated that with the CUP Tequest, the applicant is Tequesting to allow utilization of some of the xeas axeas fox outdoox stoxage. He stated that the outdoox stoxage would be used fox waxehousing, and thexefore would be mirigated and concealed from the public view by a block wall, gates, and an adjacent building that was appzoved at the last Planning Couimission Meeting. Planning Managex Villa stated that the cuxxent code xequ~es 58 paxking spaces fox the size of the building. He stated that the applicant is xequesting that he would be allowed to pxopose one paxking space fox every 1, 250 squase feet of waxehouse azea, which translates into a total of 31 parking spaces. He indicated that the applicant has subxnitted a lettex that outlines the xeasons fox this variance. He stated that traffic and pedestriau safety would not be affected by the xeducrion of paxking spaces. He stated that thexe axe sufficient axeas that could allow additional paxking should the occupancy ox structuxe change. Planning Managex Villa indicated that Staff is pleased with the pxoduct and xecommends the Planning Coimnission adopt a Resolution appxoving the Vaxiance and Condirional Use Permit and xecommends to the City Council appxoval of the Industdal Design Review based on the Exhibits, Findings and subject to the Condirions of Appxoval. Chauinan Baxnes xequested comments fxom the Public. Heaxing no comments fxom the Public, Chauman Bames xequested the applicant appxoach the table. Chautnan Barnes asked the applicant if he has xead and agxeed to the Condirions of Appxoval. John Morales, applicant fox the pxoject indicated that he is hexe tonight with John Previri and has xead and agxees to all of the Conditions of Approval with the exception to Condition No. 4. Chaimian Basnes stated to the applicant that this Condition would be necessary in case futuxe additional paxking becomes necessary. The applicant asked Planning Managex to xepeat the amount of paxking spaces that axe currendy being pxovided fox the pxoject. Plamung ManageT Villa indicated that 31 paxking spaces axe being pxovided. The applicant indicated that the amount of pasking spaces had changed many times befoxe coming to the Planning Coininission. The applicant indicated that if it would be necessary to elimuiate a waxehouse in oxdex to allow fox additional paxking, essentially, it would huxt PAGE 9- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 1, 2003 the business. He stated that he does not anticipate moxe than 15 caxs a day to utilize the paxking spaces. Chaunzan Bames stated that the Planning Coininission can not change the City's code. Vice Chauwoman Matthies stated that the purpose fox this Condition is fox a back-up plan. She stated that hopefully it won't be necessary, howevex it must be noted. Comnussionex Nash stated that it's not so much a pxoblem with this pxoject's business, howevex should another type of business take ovex, it is necessary fox this Condition to be implemented fox the next business. The applicant asked if the Condirional Use Permit stays with the building, should the business be sold? Coxnnvssioner Nash stated "yes." Chaiiman Barnes asked if anyone else wished to speak with xegasds to tUis pxoject. Hearing no futdzer comtnents, discussion was bxought back to the table fox Coisunissionexs comments. Coinmissionex Nash asked if the stoxage building is facing Minthom and Colliex? The applicant stated that the stoxage building is between the two buildings. Corrunissionex Nash stated that he likes the design and it would be a nice addirion to the community. Commissionex LaPere asked the applicant what type of enhanced treahnent would be used on the xeax of the building. Community Development D'uectox Bxady stated that the building shows colox elevation. Vice Chauwoman Matthies asked if the paxking spaces aze laxge enough to accommodate SW's. Planning Managex Villa stated that these parking spaces axe not considexed compact, and could accommodate SW'S Vice Chaixwoman Matthies if the xoof's axe visible fxom the freeway. Planning Managez Villa indicated that the xoofls would be visible to the freeway, howevex Staff and the applicant axe woxking on trying to conceal any xoof top equipment. Vice Chaitcvoman Matthies had no fuxthex comments. Coimnissionex Uhlxy asked what would be the use of the othex building. PAGE 10 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 1, 2003 John Pxeviti indicated that the building has not yet been leased out, and is not suxe as to what the building would be used fox. Comnvssionex Uh1ey indicated that he is concexned with the paxking fox the othex building. John Pxeviri indicated that he is the pxopexty ownex and the tenant of one of the buildings, and would only allow the othex building to be leased to a tenant that does not have a large amount of employees. Coimnissionex Uhlry stated that he is still concerned with the paxking should additional pazking be needed. Chaiunan Barnes suggested to add the woxding "as needed" to Condirion No. 4. Community Development Directox Bxady stated that this change to the Condirion would woxk. Commissionex Uhhy was pleased with the change and had no fuxthex comments. Chainnan Baxnes indicated that he likes the design of the two buildings, and had no fuxthex comments. The applicant asked the Coimnission if it would be a pxoblem if he could build building A, move in and then begin to build building B. Planning Managex Villa stated that Staff would woxk on that. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that it would be possible as long as all of the Conditions axe met. Cha.iunan Baznes closed the Public Heaxing at 7:46 and tequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY NASH SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-18, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 2003-02 TO ALLOW REDUCTION IN PARHING REQUIREMENTS SUBJECT TO PLANNING COMMISSION PARHING DETERMINATION IN CONJUNCTION WITH INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. I 2002-06, WITHIN M-1 ZONING - APN 377-190- 006. PAGE 11 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -APRIL 1, 2003 MOVED BY UHLRY SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-19, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, CUP NO. 2003-01 TO ALLOW OUTDOOR STORAGE FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. I 2002-06, WITHIN M-1 ZONING APN 377-190- 006. MOVED BY LAPERE SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-20, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF DESIGN REVIEW FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. 2002-06, TO BE LOCATED ON COLLIER AVENUE AND MINTHORN STREET - APN 377-190-0G6 WITH THE MODIFICATIONS MADE TO CONDITION NO. 4 AS FOLLOWS: #4 Should paxking become a pxoblem as dete~muied by the Community Development Directox, the applicant agxees to elnnuiate the outdoox storage xendering the CUP application subject to xevocation. The stoxage axeas in the xeax will be eluniiiated as r~eeded to pxovide additional paxking spaces as detexmined necessaiy and subject to the appxoval of the Community Development Directox ox designee. BUSINESS ITEMS 6. Residential Project No. R 2003-02. Four Single Family Residences. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that this is a xequest fox a Design Review fox the development of Foux Single Family Residences and xequested Associate Plannex Miller to xeview it with the Coiiunission. Associate Plannex Millex stated that this is a Design Review considexarion fox the development of foi~ single-familp xesidences to be located within the Historic Elsinoxe Ovexlay Disteict. She indicated that the homes would be located on Pottery Street neaz Poe Stxeet, Marich Steeet and Sutnnex Avenue. She indicated that two vacant lots ace located in the north secrion of the City, on Clement Stxeet. Associate Plannex Millex stated that the Pottery Stxeet lot is 6,130 squaxe feet. She indicated that a 1,299 squaxe foot pxe-manufactuxed unit is planned along with a 175 squaxe foot poxch, 84 squaxe foot poxte-cochexe, 48 squaxe foot bxeeze way and a 400 squaxe foot gaxage. She indicated that the elevarions that axe proposed axe the same elevarions that wexe xecendy appxoved fox d~ee single-family xesidences at Poe Street and Flint Stseet. She stated that the 1920's Cxaftsman type axchitectuxal featuxes axe xequixed pex the Historic Standaxds. She noted that the featuxes include horizontal siding, wide window trim and a laxge poxch with ovexsized pillaxs and xailings. PAGE 12 - PLANNING CONIMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 1, 2003 Associate Plannex Millex stated that the Matich lot is 5,904 square feet. She stated that the lot would use the same pxe-manufactuxed unit with the laxge poxch. However, she indicated that because the lot is naxxow, the poxte-cochexe would not be used. She stated that both nnits would have the gasages in the xeax. She indicated that the two adjacent vacant lots on Ciement Stxeet neax Lakeshoxe Avenue axe 5,750 squaxe feet. She stated that the same 1,299 squase foot floox plan would be used fox those lots. She noted that the exteriox of these homes will not include the Cxaftsman style poxch, but a 76 squaxe foot poxch would be added to give them moxe axchitectuxal detail. She stated that these two units would haoe the gaxages in the front. Associate Plannex Miller indicated that Staff is pleased with these units and xecommends that the Planning Coimnission adopt a Resolution based on the Findings, E~ibits and is subjected to the Conditions of Appxoval. She stated that the applicant is pxesent to answex any questions. Chaiunan Barnes asked if anyone wished to speak eithex fox or against the pxoject. Gary DeFxeitas, 3991 Mactlxthut Blvd., Suite 305, Newpoxt Beach, CA 92660 indicated that he is the applicant fox the pxoject. Chainnan Baxnes asked the applicant if he has xead and agteed to the Conditions of Appxoval. The applicant indicated that he agxees to the Conditions of Appxoval. Chaixman Barnes xequested comments fxom the Coinuiission. Coxnnvssionex Nash stated that he likes the looks of the homes. He had no futdzex comments Coimnissionex LaPete asked if these pre-manufactuxed homes would be xequixed to follow the sames guidelines as a consmxcted home. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated "yes." Commissionex LaPexe had no fuxthex comtnents. Vice Chairwoman Matthies concuxxed with the othex Coiruiussionexs. She had no furthex comments. Commissionex Uhhy stated that he is glad to see new homes on Clement Stxeet and the Foux Comexs axea. He had no fixxthex questions. Chauuzan Barnes stated that he too likes the look of the project, and had no fixxthex comments. PAGE 13 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 1, 2003 Thexe being no fiittliex comtnents, Chaiunan Barnes xequested the reading of the Resolurion. MOVED BY LAPERE SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-21, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF T.AKF: ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2003-02 FOR FOUR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES LOCATED AT POTTERY STREET, MATICH STREET, AND CLEMENT STREET (APN 374-033-017, 374-111-010) INFORMATIONAL Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that at the last Planning Coinmission Meeting, Coimnissionex LaPexe xequested to discuss having the General Plan xevised and update, since 1990 was the last tixne this was completed. Deputy Attorney Miles stated that thexe axe xegularions that xequixe that the Planning Cominission make wxitten xecommendations. It was concu~ed by all Coininissionexs to have Staff woxk on the fixst steps xecommendations to the City Council on the Genexal Plan update. STAFF COMMENTS Community Development Dixectox commented on the following. • He wanted to congxatulate Planning Managex Villa on his success on getting lus Master's Degtee. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chaitman Barnes commented on the followine: • He had no comments. Vice Chaiiwoman Matthies commented on the followinQ: • She wanted to expxess hex concerns fox the troops ovexseas, and wish that they have a speedy xetuxn home. PAGE 14 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 1, 2003 Commissionex Nash commented on the followinQ: • He wanted to congxatulate Artnando fox l~is accomplishment in obta.inuig his Mastex's Degxee in Public Administration. Cotmzussioner Uhlry commented on the following • He wanted to thank Staff fox the haxd woxk that was put into the Development Agxeements that wexe discussed this evening. Commissionex LaPexe commented on the followinQ: • He had no comments ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 8:20 PM. BARNES, CHAIRMAN Respectfully Submitted 2..~u,a. ~` ~~~' DANA C. PORCHE' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CLERK ATTEST: ~ OBERT A. BRADY, SEC ARY TO THE PLANNING COMMISSI MINUTES "SPECIAL" PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET T.AKF. ELSINORE, CA 92530 MONDAY, APRIL 07. 2003 The Regulax Planning Coininission Meeting was called to oxdex at 6:00 PM by Cha~man Barnes. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Community Development D~ectox Bxady. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES AND MATTHIES LAPERE AND NASH ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: UHLRY Also ptesent were Community Development Directot Brady and Community Development Clerk Typist Porche' PUBLIC COMMENTS None. CONSENT CALENDAR None PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Development Agreement Between Como at Tuscany Hills Corporation and the City of Lake Elsinore. Chairtnan Baznes opened the Public Heaung at 6:04 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Directox Bxady stated this item befoxe the Planving Coxmsussion is a Development Agreement beriveen Como at Tuscany Hills Coxpoxarion and the City of Lake Elsinoxe. He indicated that this project would be discussed at the City CouncIl meeting tomorxow and therefoxe needed to be bxought befoxe the Planning Coimnission tonight as a Public Hearing. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that the pxopexty which is the subject of the Development Agxeement includes an axea of appxo~nately 30 acxes of vacant land located PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 07, 2003 along Via De La Valle, located in the Tuscany Hills Specific Plan. He stated that the Development Agxeement includes 207 zesidential lots, which xepxesents appxo~cimately 30 acxes of the total 130 aczes. He indicated that the xemaining 100 acxes of the tract axe compxised of steeets and open space axeas. He commented that the purpose of the Development Agxeement is to xeduce the economic risk associated with development of the subject pxopexty. He stated that the applicant would pay the City a Development Agxeement Fee of $3,000 pex unit fox the benefit of vesting the~ development xequirements. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that the applicant is pxesent tonight to answex any questions that the Cotmnission may have. Chau7nan Baxnes asked if the public had any questions. Applicant Bill Kennedy, 5665 Ovexland Drive, San Diego, CA 92121 stated that the cuxxent pxopexty ownexs acquited the land in 1994. He stated that the c~zent investox has paid the annual assessments, various dues and CFD's since then, which to date total between 5 to 6 million dollaxs. He stated that in addition to the pxoposed $3,000 pex unit, the pxoject is paying about a$2,400 Railxoad Canyon Fee. He noted that the Development Agxeement fee would provide appxoxnnately $621,000 to the City. He stated that the pucpose of xequesting the Development Agreement is to give a cextainty ovex the futare development. He stated that if the TUMF Fees are oveicutned, the development agxeement fees axe still to be paid. He wanted to thank Staff fox the assistance cvith this Development Agxeement, and stated that he would be available fox any questions that the Coimiussion may have. Chaixman Barnes asked if anyone else would like to speak fox ox against the pxoject. Thexe being no fuxthex comments, discussion was bxought back to the table fox Commissionexs comments. Coxmnissionex Nash asked what is the time status of the pxoject. Applicant Bill Kennedy stated that they would be able to statt itmnediately. Coiinnissionex Nash asked Community Development Dixector Bxady about the five-yeax agxeement. Community Development Dixectox did claxify that the Development Agxeement was fox five yeaxs. Commissionex Nash had no fi~thex questions. Commissionex LaPexe had no fixxther comments. Vice Chau~voman Matthies had no comments. Chaixinan Basnes noted a lot of pxogress out in that axea in the past few months. He stated that he is looking foiwazd to seeing this pxoject develop. PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 07, 2003 Mxs. Fxanson of Tuscany Hills asked if thexe is going to be anothex way out of Tuscany Hills. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that the City is cursendy looking at plans for an additional eicit out of Tuscany Hills. He stated that befoxe any homes aze constructed on the North end of Tuscany Hills, that an addirional e~t must be developed. Theze being no fiitdier comtnents, Chairman Barnes closed the Public Hearing at 6:14 PM and xequested the reading of the Resolurion. MOVED BY LAI'ERE, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-22, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AND COMO AT TUSCANY HILLS CORPORATION FOR TRACT MAP 174]3-1. BUSINESS ITEMS None dNFORMATIONAL None STAFF COMMENTS Community Development D~ectox commented on the following. He wanted to inform the Planning Coixunission that this item would be heaTd at the City CouncIl Meeting on Apri18, 2003 at 7:00 PM. He stated that the TUMF Oxdinance would also be on the City Council's Agenda fox tomorrow night. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chairman Barnes commented on the followine: Chauman Barnes asked Applicant Bill Kennedy if thexe axe any xenderings of the homes. Applicant Bill Kennedy indicated that the City has the xenderings and asked Coxnmunity Development Dixectox Bxady if he could borsow them back. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated "yes." PAGE 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 07, 2003 Vice Chauwoman Matthies cotnmented on the followin ~ • She had no comments. Coim7ussionex Nash commented on the followin : • He wanted to inform the public that tonight's pxoject was just to discuss the Development Agxeement and not the Design Review of the pxoject. He indicated that the Design Review would come to the Plann'vig Coizuivssion latex. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that the homes in the Tuscany Hills Specific Plan asea axe appxoved adtninistxarively, and would not be ad~essed at the Planning Coxxunission. Cotmnissionex LaPexe commented on the followina: • He had no comments. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY MATTHIES, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT G:20 PM. BARNES, CHAIRMAN Respectfully Submitted, ~~, G P,~ DANA C. PORCHE' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CLERK ATTEST: ~YOBERT A. BRADY, SEC p~~'~Y TO PLANNING COMMISSIO ~ MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, APRIL 15, 2003 The Regulax Planning Conunission Meeting was called to oxdex at 6:00 PM by Chauman Bames. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Coimnissionex LaPese. DUE TO THE REQUEST OF CHAIRMAN BARNES, THE ORDER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WOULD NOT FOLLOW THE SEQUENCE OF THE AGENDA. THESE MINUTES WILL REFLECT THE ORDER IN WHICH THE ITEMS WERE DISCUSSED. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, NASH, MATTHIES, & LAPERE UHLRY Also present wete Community Development Dicector Bxady, Planning Managet Villa Deputy City Attorney Miles, City Engineer O'Donnell, Seniot Planner Morita, Planning Consultant Donahoe, Associate Plannet Miller, and Community Development Clerk Typist Porche'. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDARAS PRESENTED. 1. Minutes of Plauniiig Conunission Regular Meeting - April 1, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Conditional Use Pernut No. 2002-09. Commexcial Pxoject No. 2002-04 Hilltop Gxoup Inc "Shoze Acxes Motel" Chaixman Baznes opened the Public Hearing at 6:04 PM and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 15, 2003 Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that this is a xequest for a Commexcial Pxoject and CUP fox the Shoxe Acxes Motel and xequested Planning Managex Villa to review it with the Coinuiission. Planning Managex Villa stated that this pxoject befoxe the Coimnission is a xequest fox xehabilitation and enlaxgement of an e~cisting moteL He stated that the applicant intends on xenovating all structutes to cuxxent Building Code standaxds and incoxpoxating additional landscaping, paxking and xecxearional axeas. He indicated that the pxoject has fallen undex a "legal non-confoxming" status (motel use not allowed in Recxearion Zoning nox R-3 Residenrial Zonin~ because the c~xent zoning would not otherwise allow the use outright. Plamiuig Managez Villa stated that cuxxendy the e~cisting facility would encompass appxo~cimately 8,435 squaxe feet of motel use. He stated that the applicant proposes to expand by appxoxixxiately 806 squase feet. He indicated that the Design Review entails impxovement and construction of additional visitox and guess paxking spaces, extensive landscaping, addirional stxeet right-of-way dedicarion fox futare widening of Gxand Avenue, intemal and external structural rehabilitation fox units and carports, driveway and dxive-aisle xesuxfacing and xehabilitarion of the Recrearion Hall and pool azea. Planning Managex Villa indicated puxsuant to Section 17.26.929 D of the LEMC, boat- launching faciliries xequixe issuance of a CUP when these axe within the Recxearion Zoning. He stated that primarily, axeas wit6in this zoning designation are within the perimeter of the lake and thexefore within the floodplain. He stated that the applicant pxoposes to ze- condition the boat launching facility by construcrion a concxete suxface on the e~sting dock and dirt apxon and xamp. He stated that because these unpxovements axe within the flood plain, with would be necessary to get cleaxance fxom the Axmy Coxps of Engineezs, Santa Ana Regional Watex Quality Contxol Boaxd, and the County Flood Conteol District. Planning Managex Villa stated that lasdy, the pxoject has been considexed to be a extensive "clean-up" effoxt to bring the e~cisting facility into gxeatex confoxmance & compliance cvith development standasds outlined in the Zoning Code. He stated that the e~sting boat launching facility would be ~eady unproved by pxoviding paving fox easy lake access. He stated pex CEQA, tl~is pxoject has been found exempt based on Section 15301, Class 1 "Existing Faciliries" whexe addirions does not exceed moxe than 50%. Planning Managex Villa stated that he xecommends the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution, appxoving Conditional Use Pemut and Staff xecommends that the Planning Coimiussion adopt a Resolurion, xecommending to the City Council appxoval of a legal non- confounuig motel use based on the E~chibits, Findings, and the Condirions of Appxoval. Planning Managex Villa indicated that the applicant is pxesent to answex any questions that the Coimnission may have. Chaixinan Barnes xequested comments from the public. Kaxl Gailey, 2051 Sleepy Hollow Road, Escondido indicated that he is xepxesenting Hilltop Gxoup Inc. He stated that theie is an existing well that is neax the pxopexty dedicarion line, PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 15, 2003 and would like to discuss with Staff the possibility of xetauung that well if it falls into the setback. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that if the well wexe in the Public right- of-way, then it would not be allowed. Chaiilnan Barnes asked if anyone else wished to speak fox ox against this pxoject. Hearing no fuxthex comments, discussion was bxought back to the Coimnission fox comments. Commissionex Nash indicated that he likes the pxoject. He stated that the City needs these types of development. He had no fuxthex comments. Comtnissionex LaPexe asked the applicant if the paxking spaces would be full ox compact. I{axl Gailey indicated that the puking spaces would be full size. Cointnissionex Lapeex asked the applicant if he has xead and agxees to the Condirions of Appxoval. Kaxl Gailey indicated "yes." CoiTUnissionex LaPexe had no fi~thex comments. Vice Chauwoman Matthies indicated that she too likes this pxoject, and had no fuxthex comments. Thexe being no fuxther comments fxom the Connxussion, Chairman Barnes closed the Public Heaxing at 6:14 PM and xequested the xeading of the Resolurion. MOVED BY MATTHIES, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-22, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CA, APPROVING CUP NO. 2002-09. MOVED BY LAI'ERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-23, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF T.AKF ELSINORE, CA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF COMMERCIAL PROJECT NO. 2002-04 AND EXPANSION OF A LEGAL NON- CONFORMING USE FOR THE SHORE ACRES MOTEL LOCATED AT 15712 GRAND AVENUE. Iv~. Arie de Jong, Hilltop Gxoup, 605 E. Mission Road, San Maxcos, CA appxoached the podium aftex the Public Heazing had been closed and the Resolurion had been zead. He indicated that he is the uncle of the applicant and the ownex of the pxopexty. He stated that he is looking fonvatd to woxking with the City of Lake Elsinoxe and hopes that the City will be happy and satisfied with the pxoject. He stated that in xefexence to the well, he indicated PAGE 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 15, 2003 that this was just xecendy discovexed. He stated that he is unsuxe if the well is on his ptoperty ox not. He stated that the well could be a hot springs well, and wanted the City to be awaxe of it. He stated that this motel was built in the 1940's and if the well wexe deteitnined to be a hot springs well, then it could enhance the pxoject. BUSINESS ITEMS 3. Design Review fox Commexcial Pxoject No. C 2003-01. Due to conflict of intexest, Coininissionex Nash excused himself fxom the discussion of tlus pxoject as a Coininissionex. Chautnan Bames xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that the pxoject befoxe the Coimnission, is a Commexcial Pxoject located in the Downtown Historical Distxict, and xequested Associate Plannex Millex to xeview it with the Coinuiission. Associate Plannex Millex stated that this pxoject is a xequest fox xeview of a 1,784 squaxe foot commexcial building to be used fox a quick service type xestauxant. She indicated that the project is located at the noxthwest comex of Main Street and Peck Street within the Historic Ovexlay Distdct. Associate Plannex Millex indicated that the pxoposed pxoject would consist of a 1,784 squase foot single story building on the fsont portion of a 3,600 squaxe foot vacant lot. She stated that the xeax poxtion would xemain vacant, but may be used fox building expansion in the futuxe. She stated that cuxxendy the vacant azea is proposed to be used fox employee paxking. She indicated that a three-foot wide plantex would sepasate the paxking axea from the public right-of way on Peck Street. Associate Plannex Millex stated that Staff is pleased with the aschitectuxal style of the building. She stated that the building xeflects the 1920's style storefront axchitectuxe to include horizontal siding, flat xooflines with paxapet txun, wide trim axound the windows, and a wxought ixon "barn lamps." She stated that the applicant intends on using canvas awnings ovex each window. Associate Plannex Millex stated that the LEMC would xequixe 16 paxking spaces, howevex since thexe is a municipal paxking lot located within 300 feet of the pxoposed pxoject; the paxking xequixements can be xeduced. She stated that Staff suppoxts this pxoject and xecommends that the Planning CotiuTUSSion adopt a Resolution, xecommending to the City Council appxoval based on the Findings, E~ibits and is subjected to the Condirions of Appxoval. Chairman Barnes asked the public if anyone wished to speak for ox against the pxoject. PAGE 5- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 15, 2003 Cheryl Williams, 22055 Tumbleweed Dxive, Canyon Lake, CA is the pxopexty ownex of 169 North Main Stxeet also known as the "Enchanted Txeasuxes." She stated that she feaxs that the customexs of the xestaarant would use the~ dxiveway, and block the enteance into heT stoxe. Cha+r+.,a„ Barnes asked if anyone else wished to speak fox ox against the project. Thexe being no furtliex comments, Chaiunan Barnes xequested Commissionex Comments. Vice Chairwoman Matthies stated that posting signs in the xeax of the building that would say "Tow Away Zone" could help the chance of customexs paxking in the driveway of Enchanted Txeasuxes. She stated that this is a~eat pxoject and is looking forwaxd to having a new building in the Downtocvn azea. She had no fi~thex comments. Coimnissionex LaPexe conc~xed with Vice Chaiuwoman Matthies on the sign issue. He indicated that he likes the look of the pxoject and had no fixtthex comments. Chaixman Bames asked the applicant to approach the podium. Nick Nash, 157 Pennsylvania Avenue, Lake Elsinoxe, stated that this is a small stnxctuxe and cvith limited paxking. He stated that he would make siixe that the Enchanted Txeasuxes dxiveway would not be block, and indicated that should Ms. Williams wish to discuss fuxthex, that he would be available. Chaiunan Barnes stated that he likes the looks of the pxoject, and xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-24, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA. RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR THE COMMERCIAL PROJECT NO. C 2003-01 FOR A COMMERCIAL BUILDING LOCATED ON MAiN STREET AND PECK STREET (APN 374-173- 0]2). Cominissionex Nash xeconvened the Planning Commission Meeting. 4. Minox Design Review of a Single Familv Residence located at 16880 Sannelle Steeet Due to a conflict of interest, Coxiunissionex LaPexe excused himself fxom the discussion of this pxoject as a Coinmissionex. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that this is a Single Family Manufact~ed Home located in the County Club Heights axea, and xequested Associate Plannex Millex to review it with the Convnission. PAGE 6- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 15, 2003 Associate Plannex Millex stated that this pxoject is a Design Review for a pxe-manufactuxed home located in the County Club Heights axea. She stated that the home is appxoxitnately 1,710 squase feet with a 550 square foot garage. She stated that the ~ont yaxd would be landscaped to include a fxont yasd spunklex system. She indicated that the applicant added a poxte-cochexe to the front elevarion to give dimension to this stxeet facing elevation. Associate Plannex Millex stated that the pxoject meets the minim~ xequicements of the LEMC, and xecommends that the Planniug Coininission adopt a Resolurion based on the Findings, Exhibits, and is subjected to the Conditions of Appxoval. She indicated that the applicant is pxesent to answex any questions that the Coisuiussion may have. Chautnan Bames asked if anyone wished to speak fox ox against this pxoject. Thexe being no comments, discussion was bxought back to the Coiiunission fox comments. Commissionex Nash asked if the applicant owned both lots. Associate Planner Millex indicated "yes." ~ r n L a c L , Commi.crionerNarh had no further comment.r. Vice Chairwoman Matthies wanted to thank Staff fox incTeasing the design xequixements. She had no fi~thex comments. Cha~man Barnes concurxed cvith the other Coimnissionexs, and indicated that tUis homes would be a good addirion to the infill. He had no fuxther comments. Thexe being no fi~thex comments, Chautnan Barnes xequested the ieading of the Resolution. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-25, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA. APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 16880 SANNELLE STREET (APN 378-254-011 & 378-254-014) Planning Coininission took a five-minute xecess at 635 PM. Planniug Commission xeconvened the meeting at 6:40 PM. Commissionex ~dask L.aPere xeconvened the Plannuig Comnussion meeting. Chauman Barnes excused hunself fxom the xemaining poxrion of the Planning Couuvission meeting. PAGE 7- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 15, 2003 PUBLIC HEARING 5. Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 Tentarive Pazcel Ma~ No 30962 Tentarive Txact Ma~ No 30492 and Addendum to Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan Envuonmental Imgact Report. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that Chaiunan Barnes had to leave fox the Temauiuig portion of the meeting and that Vice Chauwoman Matthies would be taking over the meeting. Vice Chairwoman Matthies opened the Pubic Hearing at 6:41 PM and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development D~ectox Bxady indicated that the pxoject befoxe the Coimnission is an amendment to the Canyon Hills Specific Plan, a TPM, a TTM, and an addendutn to the EIR. He stated that Seniox Plannex Morita would xead the Staff Repoxt, and would be available foz any quesrions that the Comnussion may have. Seniox Plannex Morita stated that thexe ase foux items that ase associated with this pxoject. He stated that the City appxoved the original Canyon Hills Specific Plan, which was foxtnally known as Cottonwood Hills Specific Plan in 1989. He stated that the SP encompassed about 1,970 acxes, which wexe pxoposed fox 4,275 dwelling units, 28.4 acres of commexcial uses, 32.6 acxes fox public schools, 42.1 acres of paxks; 950 acses of natuxal open space and 77 acxes of xoads. Seniox Planner Morita stated that in addition to the appxoval to the SP, the City also appxoved the Vesting Tentarive Txact Map 23848, which subdivided the Phase 1 poxtion of the SP axea into 14 development phases. He stated that aftex the City appxoved the SP, the economy took a docvn-turn in the mid 1990's and the pxoject was not fully implemented. He stated that Paxdee in now pxoposing construcrion of the next phase. He stated that the first applicarion would ad~ess the name change ~om Cottonwood Hills to Canyon Hills. He stated that anothex change would be to pxovide a vaxiety of xesidenrial pxoduct to better xespond to market demands and various price xanges. He stated that anothex change would be to pmvide addirional Community Recxeational Centexs, and to pxovide a new onsite Fixe Station along Railxoad Canyon Road. Seniox Plannex Morita stated that the TPM No. 30962 encompasses appxoicimately 541 acxes of the Canyon Hills SP. He stated that the TPM is pxoposed fox financial puxposes and cxeates 17 total laxge lots, which would pxovide single-family xesidential uses, multi-family xesidential uses, and elementuy school site, a pazk and xecreational centex and open space. He stated that the TTM No. 30492 encompasses 61.2 acres and would cxeate 217 total lots, including 210 single-family xesidenrial lots, si~c lettexed lots far open space, and one lot fox a future ~ainage detention basin. He stated that all lettexed lots would be maintained by the Canyon Hills HOA. PAGE 8- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 15, 2003 Senior Plannex Morita noted that the final application would be fox the addendutn to the EIR. He stated that the document is necessary to evaluate the pxoject unpacts xesulting cvith the pxoposed SP amendment and subdivision maps. He stated that Staff is suppoxtive of the applicarions pxesented. He stated that in closing he xecomxnends that the Planning Coimnission adopt the Resolutions for the Addendum to the Final Canyon Hills SP EIR, Canyon Hills SP Amdt #1, TPM No. 30962 and'I"1M No. 30492 based upon the Findings, Exhibits, and is subjected to the Condirional of Appxoval. He stated that the applicant is pxesent this evening to answex any questions that the Coxiunission may have. Vice Chauwoman Matthies xequested applicant Jim Stringex to appxoach the podium. Jun Steingex, Paxdee Homes Canyon Hills stated that Paxdee Homes was chosen to be `Buildex of the Yeax", by Buildex Magazine. He stated that Paxdee Homes would be dedicating 950 acxes of open space, which would pxeseive Indian pictogxaphs in the xocks and would xepaix mitigation areas. He stated that a neighboxhood paxk would be completed in about two months. He indicated that appxo~mately 300 homes have been sold so fax and about 300 moxe to close and two new schools have been taxgeted fox the axea. NLx. Stxingex indicated that the landscape along Canyon Hills Road, Lost Road, and the futuxe Cottonwood Canyon Road would be maintained by the futuxe HOA. He stated that the development has won many awaxds to include a La~el Awaxd fox the Mastex-Planned Community of the Yeax and the SIlvex Awaxd. He indicated that KB Homes, Richmond American Homes, Woodside Homes and Community Pacific Homes axe buildexs in the Mastex Plan Community. He stated that the new fixe starion would be on the agenda fox the City Council soon. Lasdy, Mx. Stxingex indicated that he concuxs with all of the Conditions of Appxoval with the exception of Condirion No. 51, which indicates that Paxdee Homes would need to pxovide a schedule fox the impxovements on Lost Road, pxiox to the second TTM. He stated that he feels that this should be a Rivexside County issue. He had no fuxthex comments. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies xequested Shezwae Gibbons to appxoach the podium. Shezwae Gibbons, 31922 Cedaxhill Lane, Lake Elsinoxe, CA asked if the buildex wexe pxoposing to build single-family homes in MF1 & MF2. She also asked if the addirion of the fixe starion was because the buildei intended on incxeasing the density of the homes in the axea. She also asked if PaTdee Homes would be the buildex in the fixst phases, oL would anothex builder be used. She asked if the applicarions that wexe discussed covex the commexcial axeas, and what types of business would be taxgeted fox the axea. She indicated that traffic is a main concem. Iv~. Stringex stated that the axeas the first quesrion of Ms. Gibbons weie if the MF1 & MF2 wexe going to be multi-family homes, ox single-family homes. He stated that the axea axe legally xemain multi-family homes, howevex they could be convexted into single-family homes cvith tentarive maps, and they axe doing that one planning axea at a time. PAGE 9- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 15, 2003 Ms. Gibbons asked Mx. Stringex if they have the right to change theix minds. N~. Stringex indicated "yes." Ms. Gibbons asked what type of multi-family homes would be considexed. Iv~. Stxingex stated that it could be town-homes, ox apaztments, they do not know yet He stated that the MF1 zone is fox about 12 units pex acxe, which would accommodate a town- home pxoject ot less. N~. Stringex stated that the fixe station is a xequ~ement and would be located off Railxoad Canyon Road. He stated that in phase 2, Paxdee Homes would be the build~. He indicated that thexe are negotiations fox a major shopping centex to be developed in the commexcial azea. David Wayne Behxens, 32202 Lost Road, stated that his pxopexty is adjacent to the pxoject alone I,ost Road. He indicated that his concemed with the txaffic in the axea. He asked if thete would be an access at PA-14A, appxoxixnately 80 acres in that axea. Steve Uxaine, 32255 Navajo Springs Road, Wildomax, CA stated that he has xead thtough the plan, and asked to explain the noise standards. He stated that the plan indicates that constxuction should be fxom 7 am to 7 pm, yet he stated that he has heaxd constnxction noise at 4 am, and has compluned to Staff and police. He stated that even though he has complained, notF~ing has been done. He stated that Staff has complained to the builder and that the police have issued citations, yet the construcrion still takes place m the eaxly moxning houxs. He indicated that the plan also stated that the construction vehicles ase not to use the unimpxoved poxrion of Lost Road. He stated he sees the construcrion vehicles on this xoad, and feels that they would continue to use it, unless something is done. IV~. Uxaine also discussed the traffic in the axea. He stated that a teaffic study was conducted; howevex, it was conducted at a time when txaffic was at its least. He would like to have anothet traffic study completed at a peak time of traffic. He stated that motoxcycles axe using the area foT off xoad riding and stittxing up the dust in the axea, and wanted to know what would be done about that. He asked the Planning Coininission not to approve this pxoject in its pxesent form. Tom Minory, 31918 Manzanita Lane, Lake Elsinoxe, CA asked Mr. Stxingex whexe he is getting his infoxmarion from, xegaxding the new school in the Canyon Hills asea. Cxaig Coston, 32524 Spruce Wood Way, Lake Elsinoxe, CA indicated that he has concems with the natute pxeseroe that is being used by the motorcycles in the asea. Kathy Melahn, 31910 Manzanita Lane, Lake Elsinoxe, CA asked if thexe axe any plans fox a new high school to be added to the asea. Mike Geax, 32050 Cxooked 1~xow Drive, Wildomax, CA asked if the new EIR would still have the equestrian trail and wanted to know if Paxdee Homes intended on following the oxignlal EIR by having a fence along the boundary line of the tract. David Behrens, 32202 Lost Road, Lake Elsinoxe, CA stated that he heaxd that the buildexs wexe going to post a sign that said "no construcrion teaffic" and stated that this sign will not woxk. PAGE 10 - PI.ANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 15, 2003 Thexe being no fuxthex comments, Vice Chauwoman Matthies closed the Public Hearing at 7:27 PM, and xequested that Staff and applicant xespond to the comments. Community Development D'uectox Bxady noted that the new High School that is being proposed is on Rivexside Dxive. He stated that the school distdct is sepaxate from the City and the City has no control on what the school district does. 1~. Stringex stated that the new elementaiy school would be placed in planning axea nuxnbex 19, and stated that the site is cuxxendy in escxow. He stated that he gets his infoxmation direcdy &om the school district. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that the issue with the motoxcycles axe not only with this area, but citywide. He stated that code enfoxcement has been issuing citarions, and has incxeased the fine. Mx. Stringex indicated that he was not awaxe that motoxcycles wexe xiding in the open space, and that this would be considex teespassing. He stated that if anyone should see this happening, they should norify the She~ffs Depaxtment. He stated that as far as the futuxe use fox the cxeek area, it is the buildexs' intenrion to have a foot trail. He stated that he would need to xeview the amended docutnent to see if an equestrian txail would xemain. Community Development Directox Bxady stated that he has spoken with Mr. Gear and Mx. Uxaine on many occasions with the xegaxds to the noise and dust contxol. He stated that he appxeciates theix comments and indicated that he has norified l~. Stringex in the past. He stated that the houxs of consttucrion axe a iequiuement pex the Condirions of Appxoval. Mr. Stdngex stated that the conteactoxs axe well awaxe of the rules and xegulations of the houxs of construction. He suggested if someone notices that the consmxcrion is before 7:00 AM, which calling the police would help. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that the contsactoxs have been told not to use Lost Road fox construcrion traffic. He stated that he undexstands the frusteation and it is now an enforcement issue. He stated that Lost Road is a County Road, and the City has no jurisdicrion. He stated that the City is suppoxrive to have it paved. Seniox Plannex Morita stated this project would be xequixed to go thxough the Design Review fox all the constxucrion and planning axeas. He stated that what this means is that there would be moxe oppoxtunities in the futuxe to voice opuuons befoxe the final appxoval. Vice Chaiuwoman Matthies xequested comments from the Coxxunission. Commissionex Nash indicated that the positive comments out weight the negarive. He stated that as fax as the construction befoxe houxs, and noise pxoblems, axe hixed contractoxs by Paxdee Homes. He stated that Paxdee Homes needs to put some type of language in the agreements with the contxactox, and should they not follow this agxeement, that a hefty fine would be implemented upon them. He stated that since Lost Road is a County Road, he suggested contacting the County supervisor Mx. Bustex. PAGE 11 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 15, 2003 Vice Chairwoman Matthies indicated that Ms. Geax xeceived a lettex fxom Mr. Buster, the County Supervisar and requested it to be entexed into the Public Recosd. Ivlr. Geax xead the lettex from Mr. Bustex dated Maxch 28, 2003, which indicated that Lost Road was not in the County jurisdicrion, but in the City's. He asked if a ttue traffic count could be conducted. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that he has had some discussions with the applicant, and the applicant has agxeed to put up a bond fox futuxe itnpxovements. He stated that Condition No. 51 could be changed. Mx. Stringex stated that he would be willing to pay theix faix shaxe. He stated that between $40,000 to $50,000 would be an appxopriate amount. He stated that if the County did get a plan appxoved that they would be willing to pay theix shaxe as long as a is a time limitation is noted. Community Development Dixectox Bxady asked City Engineex O'Donnell if this change would xeplace Condirion No. 51. City Engineex O'Donnell stated "yes." Community Development Dixectox Bxady asked if Paxdee Homes would be willing to put up the bond, but not to pave Lost Road. Mx. Steingex stated "yes." Deputy Attomey Miles stated that the context of CEQA and the pxoposed change to Condirion No. 51 would be wise, because the City's sees from the addendum the significant addirional envixonmental factoxs, coming from the paving of Lost Road. He stated that thexe is a 1989 docutnent in which the Countp was the xesponsible agency, which this issue came up. He stated that the City is now looking at the modifications of the pxoject fox the purposes of the addendum. He indicated that in 1959, the County had an opportunity to deal with these extra jurisdictional issues. He stated that it appeaxs that theix wexe some form of compxomise mitigarion put in place, which is now being triggexed in the context of what is being changed from the pxoject fox the puxposes of the addendum. Commissionex LaPexe asked Mr. Stringex if it would be possible to have the contxacted construcrion company sign a docutnent that outlined the hours of woxk, and would state that fines would be issued, should they not abide by the contxact. Mx. Stringex suggested adding it to the Conditions. Deputy Attomey Miles asked 1~. Stringex if he would be open to a xeasonable pexformance bond. Mr. Stringex indicated "yes." Cotmnissionex LaPexe stated that with the xegaxds to the lettex from Mx. Bustex, he stated that he feels that he shifted the blame. He indicated that he did not feel that it is faix to the developer. He stated that he feels that this is a posirive pxoject, and sees gxeat things coming from tUis ptoject. He indicated to the public that again, this is not the design xeview, and PAGE 12 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 15, 2003 this item would be bxought befoxe the Coimnission and City Council again, and that the public should continue to voice theix opuuons. He had no fiuthex comments. Vice ChaiLwoinan Matthies thanked the public fox coming to the meeting. She also thanked Iv~. Stringex fox his pxesentarion. She stated that sometimes woxking with the County on pxojects like this one, can be difficult. She had no futthex comments. Thexe being no fi~thex comments, the Vice Chauwoman Matthies xequested the xeading of the Resolurion. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-26, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA. RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE ELSINORE CERTIFICATION OF THE ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-27, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA. RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF T.AKF ELSINORE APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN. MOVED BY LAl'ERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-28, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF T.AKF: ELSINORE, CA. RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF T•AKF ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAI' NO. 30962 WHICH SUBDIVIDES 541 ACRES OF THE CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN AREA INTO LARGE LOTS FOR FINANCLAL PURPOSES. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-29, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF T.AKF: ELSINORE, CA. RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30492 WHICH SUBDIVIDES 61.2 ACRES OF THE CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN AREA INTO 217 TOTAL LOTS WITH THE CORRECTIONS TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: #51 Provide a,~50,000 bond for L.art Aoad o_(f-~zte impmvements prior to the recond TentaCive Tract Map af~pmval. The bond .rhall be ured for Pardee'r rhare of tbe funding when I~'verside Caunty Baad Department impmver La rt Koad. The bond .rhall ea~iire in 10 yearr. PAGE 13 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 15, 2003 #133 The aj~plicant rball pa.rt a~5,000.00 j~erformance bond or other acceptable form of recunty to addrerr futun laav enforcement needr tbat may be caured by j~otentialpr ject conrtruction violaCionr. The j~erformance bond shall ~zmain in effect for the term of construction and rhall be: (9) aaeptable to the applicant, (2J in a form ajiproved by the City Attorney, and (3) reaaonably addrer.res additional enforcement requirements tbat an not fearibly addrerred by the SherifJ's Office. • Italicrindicate addition to text, ~g13 indicates xemoval fxom text. Vice ChaiLwoman Matthies xequested a five minute xecess at 8:10 PM Planning Counnission meeting xeconvened at 8:21 PM. 6. Residenrial Project No. 2003-OS "Shoxepoin~' (at La Laguna Estates) Foxecast Homes Vice Chaixwoman indicated that this is a Business Item, and xequested the xeacling of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development D~ectox Bxady stated that the pxoject befoxe the Conunission is a Design Review fox Foxecast Homes, at the La Laguna Estates, and xequested Planning Consultant Donahoe xeview it cvith the Coininission. Planning Consultant Donahoe indicated that this Design Review is located the westexn edge of the City, noxth of McVickex Paxk and west of Gxand Avenue and Lincoln Stseet, in the Speufic Plan Axea B. She indicated that the Design Review would consist of foux small pzoducts and foux laxge pxoducts. She stated that four small pxoducts would have 3 single story models and one 2 story model, and that the lasge pzoducts would have 2 single story models and 2 two story models. She noted that the homes xange in sizes fxom the smallest at 1,342 and the laxgest at 2,569 squaze feet. She indicated that the ascl~itect~al design would be Spanish, Santa Baxbaxa, Montexey, and Cxaftsman style. She indicated that these designs axe keeping in line with the Specific Plan. She stated that the Design Guidelines in the La Laguna Estates Specific Plan encouxage architectuxal fearixxes that cxeate a strong indoox/outdoox xelationship. She stated that to comply with this guideline, the applicant has included front yeax couxtyaxds in many of the floox plans, and offers Fxench doors to the xeax yaxds in some of the units. Plam~ing Consultant Donahoe indicated that the issues with the pxoject. She stated that the fixst issue would be the Foux-sided Axticularion. She stated that Staff has woxked with the applicant to develop acceptable design schemes that pzomote quality constructing through enhanced feat~es, and a mix of entry treatments that elnninate monotonous streetscapes. She indicated that once that was accomplished, staff asked the applicant to wxap many of these featuxes axound the units to enlace the side and xeax elevarions. She stated that she was paxdcularly concerned with the topogxaphy of the site, and the locarion of the community trail above and belvnd the xow of homes on Sunswept Drive. She noted that because of tlvs PAGE 14 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 15, 2003 concem, Condirion 15 and 16 wexe added, which addxess this concern Planning Consultant Donahoe stated that the second issue has to do with phasing plan. She indicated that the applicant was to design a phasing plan, which ens~es that subsequent constnxcrion does not dist~b new xesidents of akeady occupied homes. She indicated that the applicant has pxoposed Phasing Plan complies only on Mesquite Drive. She stated that Condition No. 17 addresses this issue. She noted that additionally, Condition No.18 xequ~es that the applicant consult with the Rivexside County F~e Depaxtment, to ensute that they have met pximaty and secondary access requixements during construction. Planning Consultant Donahoe stated that the pxoposed pxoject is in accoxdance with the CEQA and Staff xecommends that the Planning Coinmission adopt a Resolurion appxoving Residenrial Pxoject, based on the Findings, E~ibits and is subjected to the Condirional of Appxoval. She stated that the applicant is present this evening to answex any questions that the Couunission may have. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies indicated that this is a business item, howevex if anyone wished to speak fox ox against the pxoject, may do so at this time. Steve Foxd, applicant fox Foxecast Homes, 3536 Concouxs Stseet, Suite 100, Ontaxio CA. stated that he agrees to all of the Conditions of Appxoval with the exception of Conditions No. 32, whexe it discusses that all wood fencing should be painted pxiox to final appxoval. He stated that he would pxefex the language to state a stain, xathex than paint. He stated that the next issue would be on Condition No. 13 whexe it discusses tubulax steel view fence along the community trail. He stated that he would pxefex to use lodge pole. Lasdy, he is xequesting to modify the phasmg as shown on E~hibit "D" in the Staff Repoxt. Plamvng Consultant Donahoe stated that concenung the stained wood fence, she would pxefex paint, since stain does not last and does not xecommend changing that Condirion. She stated that the tubulaz fencing is fox safety purposes. She stated that if the applicant could show the cxoss secrion of the txail, showing the pxoposed pole fencing, that the Staff would considex elnninating Condition No. 13. Lasdy, she indicated that Staff would accept the modification of the Phasing. Vice Chairwoman Matthies xequested the Cotmnissionex's comments. Co~sunissionex LaPexe stated that Condirion No. 32 could be negotiated with the Community Development Dixector. He also indicated to Staff and to the applicant if they would considex adding a Condition fox the noise controL The applicant indicated that noise control has been added to the contract. Plannuig Managex Villa stated that the noise conteol is alteady added into the Conditions of Appxoval foz the Tentadve Tract Map. Coimiussionex LaPexe had no fuxthex coxsunents PAGE 15 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 15, 2003 Cotnmissionex Nash stated that if the paint vexse stain is acceptable with Staff, then he would agree to it. He stated that if Staff wexe comfoxtable with the changes made to the Phasing, then he would accept the change. He had no fuxthex comments. Vice Cha'vwoman Mattlves stated that she would agxee with the changes made to the Condirions of Appxoval. She stated that she had no furtheT comments, and xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-30, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA. APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2003-05, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 110 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES IN PHASE 1 OF THE LA LAGUNA ESTATES SPECIFIC PLAN, AND FOR A 6 UNIT MODEL HOME COMPLEX, LOCATED NORTH OF MCVICKER PARK AND WEST OF GRAND AVENUE AND LINCOLN STREET, IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 392-260-040 AND A PORTION OF 391-260-047 WITH THE ELIMINATION TO CONDITION NO. 73 AND MODIFICATIONS TO CONDITION NO. 32 t1ND TO THE PHASING SECTION IN CONDITION N0.17 AS FOLLOWS: #17 Ocotillo Dxive (`A' Dxive) shall be completed pxiox to the fixst building permit in ~e ~ Phase 5, fxom ' Metquite Drive to the noxthern intexsection with Sunswept Drive, and construcrion vehicles and equipment shall utilize Ocotillo Drive to access the xemainiug phases of this pxoject. a. Begfnning u~ith Phare 5, phasing shall commence in a clockwise progxession ~ ~€ from Phare 1, continuing north on Sunswept Drive and ending at the southern end of Ocotillo Dxive. INFORMATIONAL STAFF COMMENTS Community Development D~ectox commented on the following. • He indicated that the Development A~eements that wexe discussed and approved at the last Planning Coiiunission Meeting went befoxe the City Council and appxoved as well as the TUMF Oxdinance. PAGE 17 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRiL 15, 2003 ATTEST: R~BERT A. $RADY, SECRE'P~Y TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION~~ Italic.r indicates addirion to text, ~ indicates xemoval fxom text. PAGE 16 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 15, 2003 PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chaixtnan Barnes commented on the following: • No Comments Vice Chaitwoman Matthies commented on the follourine: • She wanted to cvish everyone a Happy Eastex. Coiuinissionex Nash commented on the followinQ: • He wanted to thank Staff fot theix gxeat woxk on the pxepaxation of tonight's meeting. • He had the f~st Homeless Task Foxce meeting which he thought was very intexesting and will keep evexyone posted on the developments. Commissioner LaPexe commented on the following~ • No Comments ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 8:50 PM. BARNES, CHAIRMAN Respectfully Submitted t~C~.f.G~ ~ ~~jl'~`~• DANA C. PORCHE' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CLERK TYPIST MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET T.AKF. ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, MAY OG. 2003 The Regulax Planning Coininission Meeting was called to order at 6:00 PM by Chaixman Barnes. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Coiiuiussionex Uhlry. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, NASH, MATTHIES, LAPERE, UHLRY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Also present wexe Community Development D'uector Brady, Planning Manager Villa Depury City Attorney Miles, City Engineet O'Donnell, and Community Development Secretary Gibbons. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. CONSENT CALENDAR Comnussionex LaPexe indicated that on page 5 of 17 of the 1b Minutes, 6 paxagxaph it should be noted that Coinmissionex LaPexe was excused fxom this poxtion of the meeting due to conflict of intexest, and delete paragraph 6. He stated that it should also be amended to xead that he reconvened the Planning Coimnission meeting at 6:40 PM. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR WITH THE ABOVE MODIFICATIONS TO THE MINUTES OF APRIL 15, 2003. 1a Minutes of Planning Coimnission Special Meeting - Ap~17, 2003 1b Minutes of Plamiiiig Commission Regulax Meeting - Apxil 15, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 2003-10, and Design Review for Industrial Pxoject No. I 2002-07 - APN 377-190-004. PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 06, 2003 Chaurnan Barnes opened the Public Hearing at 6:05 PM Community Development D'uector Bxady stated that this item befoxe the Couiinission is a CUP and Design Review fox an outdoox stoxage facility. He stated that the applicant has iequested that this item be continued to the June 4, 2003 Plamiing Coxmnission due to issues with the Condidons of Appxoval. Chairnzan Baxnes closed the Public Hearing at 6:05 PM. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE CONTINUANCE TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2002-10 AND DESIGN REVIEW FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. I 2002-07 TO THE Ji7NE 4, 2003 REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION. 3. Libertu SP No. 93-3. Amendment No. 4,_General Plan Amendment (GPA1 No. 2003- 01, Zone Change (ZC) No. 2003-01, and Indusuial Project No 2003-02 Cha.vman Barnes xequested the xeading of the Staff Repart. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that the item befoxe the Coinmission is a xequest fox a GPA and ZC fox an Indusuial Pxoject, and xequested Planniug Managex Villa to xeview it with the Coinmission. Plaunuig Managet Villa stated that this item is cuxxenflp within the Libexty Specific Plan Axea. He indicated that he is xequesting consideration of foux acrions, which would be fox the Liberty Specific Plan Amendment No. 4, a GeneTal Plan Amendment, a Zone Change, and the Design Review fox Industrial Pxoject No. 2003-02. Planning Managex Villa stated that the pxoject is located appxoxirnately 100 feet fox the intexsecrion of Coiydon Road and Cexeal Road, neaz Mission Trail fox putpose of developing a 24,925 squase foot industrial building, with appxoximately 71 paxking spaces and 14,719 squaze feet of landscaping. He noted that this area is being pxoposed to be xemoved itom the specific plan and incorpoxated into the City's Genexal Plan with a designation of "Lrl" (I.iuiited Industrial) and a Zoning Designation of M-1.. Plauning Managex Villa stated Environmental 'unpacts associated with this pxoject would be xeduced to levels of insignificance and thexefoxe a Mitigated Negative Declazation has been pxepaxed. He noted that the Mitigated Negative Declaxation has been posted fox xeview with the County Clexk. Plamiing Managex Villa stated that this pxoject meets all of the xequixements of the LEMC, and Staff xecommends that the Plamiuig Couimission adopt Resolutions, based on the Findings, Exl~ibits, and Condirions of Approval. He indicated that the applicant is pxesent this evening and would be available fox questions. PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 06, 2003 Jeff Sannex, 21021 Ventara Blvd., Suite 300, Woodland Hills stated that he is the applicant fox the pxoject. He indicated that he has concems with Condirion No. 27, which xelates to one dxiveway allowed fox ingxess and egress to Coiydon Street. He stated that City Engineex O'Donnell has come up with a solurion by xesuicting the egress fxom one of the driveways to right turn in, right uxrn out. Chauinan Baxnes asked the applicant which driveway. IVIr. Sannex stated that it would be the one closest to Cexeal Stxeet. Chauman Baxnes xequested any fuxthex comments from the Public. Hearing no fuxthex comments, discussion was bxought back to the Coiiunission fox comments. Vice Chaixwoman Mattlues asked if the City Engineex was satisfied with the changes to Condirion No. 27. City Engineex O'Donnell indicated that he agxeed to the changes. Vice Chauwoman Matthies had no furthex comments. Coxsunissionex Nash asked about the woxding changes to Condirion No. 27. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that the Condirion modificarion should state that the driveway along Corydon should be a right-tum-in and xight-tuxn-out only and pxoperly signed. Coxxunissionex Nash asked the applicant if he has xead and agxeed to the Condirions. l~. Sannex indicated "yes." Commissionex Nash had no fuidzex quesrions. Couimissionex LaPexe concuxxed with Coimnissionex Nash and had no fi~thex comments. Chaitman Barnes stated that he too concuxs with the othex Commissioners and had no farthex comments. Coinmissioner Uhlxy asked if acxeage was 23 ox 32. Plamiing Managex Villa stated that it should xead 23 acres. Commissionex Uhlxy indicated that he had no fuxthex comments. Thexe being no fi~thex comments, Chaivnan Baxnes closed the Public Hearing at 6:20 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Resolutions. PAGE 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY O6, 2003 MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-31, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA. RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF MND 2003-O1 FOR SP NO. 92-3, AMENDMENT NO. 4, GPA NO. 2003-02, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003-02, AND INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. 2003-02 WHICH ENTAIL THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING WITHIN APN 270-030-072. MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-32, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA. RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF GENERAI. PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003- 01 TO AMEND THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PARCEL SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS APN 370-080-014 FROM RESIDENTIAL -3 DESIGNATION UNDER THE LIBERTY SPECIFIC PLAN TO LIMITED INDUSTRIAL UNDER THE GENERAL PLAN. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-33, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF T.AKF ELSINORE, CA. RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003-01 CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF A PARCEL SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS APN 370-080-014 FROM THE LIBERTY SPECIFIC PLAN TO LIMITED MANUFACTURING UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE. MOVED BY MATTHIES, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-34, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA. RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF DESIGN REVIEW FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. 2003-02, TO BE LOCATED ON CEREAL STREET - APN NO. 370-080-014. BUSINESS ITEMS 4. Minox Design Review of a Single Family Residential Pxoject located at 110 & 112 Davis Street. ChaiLinan Barnes indicated that this is a Business Item and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. PAGE 5- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY O6, 2003 Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that the item befoxe the Coininission is a xequest fox a Minox Design Review (MDR) of tcvo single-family homes, and in the absence of Community Development Technician Hennings, he would be xeading the Staff Repoxt. Community Development D~ector Bxady stated that applicant is xequesting considexation for the construcrion of two single family xesidences located at 110 & 112 Davis Steeet, between Lakeshare Drive and Heald Avenue. He indicated that the asea is located with Axea 6 of the Lake Elsinoxe Historic Ovexlay District. He stated that the applicant intends to construct two 1,857 with 431 squate foot attached gaxages on adjacent lots. He stated that as xequixed by the Historic Ovexlay District, the gazages would be placed in the xeax of the homes and accessible from two individual driveways. Community Development Dixectoi Bxady indicated that the style of the homes would be excellent examples of the Cxaftsman style homes pxesented in the Historic Elsinoxe Axchitect~al Design Guidelines. He stated that the pxoject meets the ininiinum xequ~ements of the LEMC and the Historic Elsinoxe Ovexlay Disteict He noted that Staff xecommends that the Planning Coinmission adopt a Resolurion based on the Findings, E~ibits, and Condirions of AppxovaL He stated that the applicant is pxesent to answet any quesdons that the Coimnission may have. Chairman Barnes xequested the applicant to appxoach the Podium. Jay Hattabaugh, 17541 Baskshatt, Lake Elsinoxe stated that he is the applicant and contractox fox the pxoject. He stated that he hopes by building a few of the Cxaftsman's style homes, it would incxease the activity in the axea. He indicated that the xequ~ements to build in the Historic Elsinoxe Ovexlay District are stringent, and he suggested that by making the xestrictions a litde easiex to meet, it might pxomote moxe stick fxame homes being constructed, verus manufactured homes. He had no fuxthex comments. Chaiuuan Barnes xequested comments fxom the Conunission. Com~nissioner Nash asked the applicant if the two homes axe idenrical. Mx. Hattabaugh stated that the floox plans axe the same, howevex the exteriox of the homes axe somewhat diffexent. Commissionex Nash indicated that the looks of these homes axe gxeat. He suggested to take the noted suggesrions of xevising the xequirements of the Historic Elsinoxe Ovexlay District to City Council, as these ase very good points to consider. He had no fixxthex comments. Comnvssionex LaPexe concuxxed with Couuzvssionex Nash. He stated that the State of California does not allow to pxohibit of manufact~ed homes. He indicated that the xequixements of manufactured homes ase the same as a single family home. He stated that he likes the design of the homes, and had no fuxthex comments. PAGE 6- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY O6, 2003 Vice Chaixwoman Matthies concurxed with Coinmissionex Nash and commented that the Staff Repoxt had indicated that the school is called Elsinoxe Jx. High, and it should xead as Elsinoxe Middle School. She had no fuxthex comments. Coxsunissionex Uhlry asked about the comments xegaxding the gazages. He asked if he was if it was due to the construction costs. 1~. Hattabaugh a~eed. Commissionex Uhlry noted that these homes aze two story, and homes in the xeax of these homes would lose the view, howevex this is paxt of an infill pxoject. Chairtnan Baxnes asked Community Development Dixectox Brady if the Histoxic Elsinoxe Overlay District allows detached gaxages in the xeax. Community Development Dixectox Bxady agxeed. Chainnan Barnes asked if the coloxs of the two homes would be diffexent. Community Development Dixector Bxady stated that the coloxs would be slighdy different. Mx. Hattabaugh stated he has built anothex set of these homes in anothex town. He stated that they used the same coloxs, and they axe much diffexent on each home. He indicated that the ~ont of each home is also diffexent, one having moxe stone than the othex. He noted that if needed, he would be willing to change the colors. Chairma., Barnes asked the applicant if he has xead and agxees to the Conditions of Appxoval. NIx. Hattabaugh agxeed. Chautnan Barnes commended l~. Hattabaugh on the exceptional job of the design of the two homes, and hope that this will inspire moxe development of these types of homes fox this area. He had no fiathex comments. Deputy Attorney Miles indicated that a change to the Staff Report whexe it discusses CEQA would be necessary. He stated that he would like Secrion 15303a to xead; exempts the consttucrion of up to tl~ee single-family xesidences in uxbanized axeas. He stated that it should also include the sentence that states the pxoject also sarisfies the xequixements of an exemption fox infill development undex Section 15332 class 32. Chauman Barnes asked if anyone wished to comment on the changes. Thexe being no futthex comments ox changes, Chauinan Baxnes xequested the reading of the Resolurion. PAGE 7- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY O6, 2003 MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-35, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF 7•AKF ELSINORE, CA. APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 110 & 112 DAVIS STREET APN NO. 373- 117-004 & 008. 5. Minox Design Review of a Single Familv Residence located at 16212 Axnold Avenue. Chainnan Barnes xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt Community Development Director Brady stated that this is fox a Minox Design Review of a single-family xesidence, and xequested Planning Managex Villa to xeview it with the Commission in the absence of Community Development Technician Hennings absence. Planning Managex Villa stated that the pxoject befoxe the Commission is a MDR fox a single- family xesidence located on Arnold Avenue, between Swan Avenue and Stoddasd Street, and noxthwest of Gunnexson Street. He stated that the home is a 1,417 squaxe foot single-story house with a 633 squaxe foot attached gaxage and a 116 squaxe foot covexed porch. He indicated that the xesidence would occupy appxo~cunately 27.8% of the 7,800 squase foot lot. Platu~uig Managex Villa indicated that the pxoject meets all of the uuniuzum xequ~ements of the LEMC, and that Staff xecommends that the Planning Comnussion adopt a Resolution based on the Findings, Exhibits, and subjected to the Condirions of Appxoval. He stated that he believes the applicant is pxesent to answex any questions that the Commission may have. Chaiunan Barnes asked if anyone wished to speak fox ox against the pxoject. H. K. Salvine, City of Lake Elsinoxe asked what is the diffexence beriveen manufactuxed, modulax and a teailex home. He stated that he was the only one from his axea that showed up fox this meeting, and has some concexns since he thought that only custom homes weTe built in the area. Chautnan Baxnes asked if anyone else wished to speak for oT against the pxoject. Thexe being no fuxthex comments, discussion was bxought back to the Coisunission fox comments. Chainnan Barnes asked Community Development Dixectox Bxady if he could answex N~. Salvine's question. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that he fust wanted to let everyone know that this home is a stick-built home, and not a manufactuxe home. He stated that a manufactured, modulax home come on wheels and aze placed on a pexmanent foundarion. He also wanted to xeitexate that the City can not pxohibit a manufact~ed home, howevex we do xequ~e them to meet the same Development Standaxds of a stick built home. PAGE 8- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY O6, 2003 Co~sunissionex Uh1ty indicated that he likes the looks of the home, and stated that it would help enhance the axea. He noted that a manufacri~ed home is actually placed on a foundarion, whexeas a mobIle home, the axle is xetained, and is not necessaxy to be xemoved. He stated that he is in favox of the pxoject and had no fi~thex comments. Vice Chaixwoman MattUies indicated that the home looks a litde plain to hex, but othex than that she has no fiixthex comments. Coimnissioner LaPexe asked the applicant to appxoach the podium. Planning Managex Villa indicated that he thought the applicant was pxesent, but appaxendy not. Commissionex LaPexe indicated that he too agxees cvith 1~. Salvine's opuuon on manufactuted homes. He also indicated that he concuxs with Vice Chauwoman Matthies on the plainness of the home. He had no fuxthex comments. Comtnissionex Nash had no comments Chaixtnan Bames asked if any street unpxovements would be necessaiy Comxnunity Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that the Condirions of AppTOVa1 outliue the in-lieu payment fox futuxe off-site public unpxovements in Condition numbex 27. Chaixman Baxnes noted the Condition. Befoxe xequesting the xeading of the Resolution, Chaitman Barnes xeceived a xequest to speak fxom IVIr. Rick Haminel. Rick Hatmnel, City of Lake Elsinoxe indicated that he lives in the County Club Heights axea, and indicated that the locarion of this home is on a very dangexous stxeet. He stated that he has xequested in the past speed butnps to help slow down the txaffic. He indicated that he has lived in the axea for seven yeaxs, and whexe the house is going to be placed, thete is a tree. He stated that the txee has been hit 3 times in seven yeass. He stated that some pxovisions need to be made fox safety. Chauman Barnes noted that the unpxovements to the stxeet would be addxessed as the steeet is impxoved. Community Development Directox Bxady commented that the City is cuxxendy conducting a study in the Country Club Heights axea. He indicated that traffic is one of the issues that the Study would be adckessing. Thexe being no fi~thex comments, ChauiTian Barnes xequested the ieading of the Resolution. PAGE 9- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY O6, 2003 MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-36, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA. APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 16212 ARNOLD AVENUE APN N0.378-201-004,005, & 006. INFORMATIONAL None STAFF COMMENTS Community Development D~ectox Bxady commented on the following. • He wanted to introduce rivo new employees to the Planning Division. He intxoduced Lisa Gibbons, who would be assisting the Planning Division as well as woxking as the Housing Clexk and Rolfe Pxeisendanz, the new Associate Plannex. He stated that the City has hixed Kaxen Staley to help assist in the Code Enfoxcement Division, Coxdie Millex as the new xeceprionist and two new building inspectoxs. He indicated that the Engineexing Division has hixed a new Associate Engineex, and would be l~iuug an Engineering Technician in the next few weeks. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chairman Barnes comtnented on the following: • He welcomed the new employees to the City. • He also indicated that he is glad to heax about the Corydon Pxoject. Vice Chairwoman Mattlues commented on the followine: • She wanted to thank the public fox comuig to the Planning Conunission meeting. • She welcomed the new employees to the City. Cominissionex Nash commented on the following: • He xequested a copy of the pxoposed txaffic plan that has to do with Colliex and the futuxe expansion and set backs and circularion elements for Colliex. • He welcomed the new staff to the City. PAGE 10 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY O6, 2003 Commissionex LaPexe cominented on the followine: He stated that in xelarion to the gendeman who made comments xegaxding the County Club Heights atea, he stated that the Community Development Dixector Bxady indicated that a study is cuxxendy being conduct fox that axea, which should be completed in 6 months ox less. He stated that N~. Hammel would have plenty of time to expxess himself in relation to the area. • He also wanted to welcome the new employees to the City. Coininissionex Uhl~ coxnmented on the following He welcomed all of the new employees to the City. He mformed Staff and the Planning Coimnission that Richaxd Bullaxd who was on the Planning Coimnission eight yeaxs ago had by pass suxgery, and is doing well. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY MATTHIES, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 6:59 PM. BARNES, CHAIRMAN Respectfully Submitted ~~~,c~ ~ . ~~~ DANA C. PORCHE' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CLERK TYPIST ATTEST: ~OBERT A. BRADY, SECIj~'I'ARY TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIC~C MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, MAY 20, 2003 The Regulax Planning Couiinission Meeting was called to oxdex at 6:04 PM by Vice Chauwoman Matthies The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Coimnissionex Nash. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: NASH, MATTHIES, LAPERE, and UHLRY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES Also present were Community Development Dixector Brady, Planning Managex Villa Deputy City Attoiney Miles, City Engineer O'Donnell, Senior Planner Morita, Associate Planner ponahoe, and Community Development Clerk Typist Porche' PUBLIC COMMENTS Maxk Dennis, 29003 Wliite Sails CT, Lake Elsinoxe CA indicated that he is distuxbed by the ho~s of consttuction taking place in the La Laguna Estates pxoject. He stated that the Conditions of Appxoval indicate consteucrion is to end at 5:00 PM. He stated that he has obseroed construction continuing up to 6:30 PM. He indicated that he has discussed this issue with Community Development Directox Bxady, who indicated that the developex is aware of the situation, but the gxading still continues pass the time allotted. He has xequested the Cominission to considex this issue pxiox to appxoving tonighPs pxoject. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting - May 6, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Tentative Paccel Map No 31011 and Tentative Tract Map No 30789 Vice Chauwoman Matthies opened the Public Hearing at 6:09 PM and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 20, 2003 Community Development D~ectox Bxady stated that this item befoxe the Couunission is a Tentarive Paxcel Map and Tentative Txact Map fox La Laguna Estates, and Tequested Associate Plannex Donahoe to xeview it with the Couuznssion. Associate Plannex Donahoe indicated that this item befoxe the Coimnission is a xequest fox appxoval of the Tentative Paxcel Map 31011 to divide 433 acxes of unimptoved pxopexty into thxee paxcels for the puxpose of sale. She stated that a xequest is also fox appxoval of Tentative Txact Map No. 30789 to fuxthex subdivide 82 acres of Paxcel 1 into 116 xesidenrial lots and 6 open space lots. Associate Plannex Donahoe stated that T"TM No. 30789 offexs lot sizes that suxpass the 6,000 squaxe foot minimum xequixed. She stated that the smallest lot pxoposed is 7,506 squaxe feet, and the laxgest lot is ovex a half acxe at 20,590 squaxe feet. She indicated that of the 116 residential lots, all homes in the txact except fox 11 axe adjacent to ox axe dixecdy acxoss fxom the open space. Associate Plannex Donahoe indicated that she xeceived a lettex via fax fxom Nfr. Dietz. She stated that he owns pxopexty adjacent to the pxoject, and is land locked, and would like to have continued access via the service xoad. Associate Plannex Donahoe gave a copy of the lettex to each Commissionex and to the City Engineex. She stated that City Engineex O'Donnell pxoposed a Condition that would addxess this concem. Associate Plannex Donahoe xequested that Planning Coimnission appxove and adopt a Resolurion based on the Findings, Exhibits, and Conditions of Approval. She indicated that the applicant is pxesent to answex any questions that the Comuiission may have. Vice Chauwoman Matthies indicated that this is a Public Hearing and xequested comments fxom the Public. Steve Foxd, 3536 Concouxs Dxive, Ontario, the applicant fox the pxoject. He indicated that he has xead and agtees to Condirions of Appxoval as noted, and would answex any quesrions that the Cotmnission may have. Thexe being no fiuthex comments fxom the Public, Vice Chairwoinan Matthies bxought the discussion back to the Coimnission fox comments. Conuiussionex LaPexe asked the applicant if he was in chazge of the pxoject. 1~. Foxd agxeed. Commissionex LaPeie asked Mr. Foxd how he would enfoxce the noise issue with his subcontxactoss. Iv~. Foxd indicated that he has xequested to have the ho~s of construcrion extended, howevei it was denied. He indicated that the ho~s of construcrion axe listed in the construction documents, and that he is doing his best to adhexe to it. PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 20, 2003 Cotnmissionex LaPexe asked if the subcontxactoxs have a copy of the Conditions of Appxoval. Mx. Foxd indicated "yes." Coimnissionex LaPexe liked the looks of the pxoject, and had no fiitdzex comments. Coinmissionex Nash asked Community Development Dixectox Bxady if he xecalled on what xesulted for the Canyon Hills Pxoject, which essentially had the same situarion as this one with the noise issue. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that the developex had to post a$5,000 Cash bond. Coxnnussionex Nash suggested that this could be applied to this pxoject as well, since the developex is having difficulries with the subcontractoxs complying with the houxs of construcrion. Corrunissionex Nash had no fi~ther comments. Coixunissionex Uhhy asked the applicant on how he felt on posting a bond. Ms. Foxd indicated that his goal is to have some peace with the xesidents of the pxoject. He asked if Phase II could have diffexent ho~s pex the City's Noise Oxdinance, which is from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM due to the pxoxnnity and being so fax away fxom the xesidences with the exceprion of Sandpiper. Comnussionex Uhlxy stated that within the 1000 feet fxom Sandpipex, the applicant would not woxk after 5:00 PM, and beyond that the subconteactox could woxk up to 7:00 PM up to November 1~`. He stated that this would include the $5,000 cash bond. Mx. Foxd agxeed Couiuiissionex Uhlry asked about Condirion No. 30 whexe it discusses the access to the adjacent paxcel. He asked if the gate to the access is locked. Mx. Foxd indicated "yes." Commissionex Uhlry asked if Mx. Dietz has a key to the gate. Iv~. Foxd indicated that he has nevex heaxd of iV~. Dietz. Associate Plannex Donahoe stated that the Water District has a key fox Mx. Dietz. George Dale sepxesenting the pxopexty ownexs also indicated that he has nevex heaxd of a Mx. Dietz as well. PAGE 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 20, 2003 Mx. Foxd asked Vice Chaitwoman Matthies if the Paxcel Map allowed bonding City Engineex O'Donnell indicated that the City could come up with an atnount fox the bonding on the Paxcel Map. He indicated that it would be axound 200 pexcent. Mx. Foxd agzeed. CoiTUxussionex Uhhy asked the City Engineex about Condirion No. 79 whexe it discusses the paiks and open space to be maintained. He asked the purpose of this Condirion. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that the Condition is standaxd vexbiage. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies stated that all issues had been xesolved, and she had no fuxthex comments. Thexe being no fuxthex comments, Vice Cha~woman Matthies closed the Public Heaxing at 6:41 PM and xequested the xeading of the Resolurion. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that Condirion No. 11 would be modified to include language that would addxess the houxs of construction, distance, and period. He indicated that Condirion No. 82 would be added to ad~ess the cash bond. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-37, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF T.AKF ELSINORE, CA. RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 31011 LOCATED NORTH OF MCVICKER PARK AND WEST OF GRAND AVENUE AND LINCOLN STREET (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 381-2G0-040- 047, -051), A DIVISION OF 433 ± ACRES OF UNIMPROVED LAND INTO THREE (3) PARCELS. MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-38, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA. RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30789 LOCATED NORTH OF MCVICKER PARK AND WEST OF GRAND AVENUE AND LINCOLN STREET (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 391-260-047 AND -051), A SUBDIVISION OF 82 ± ACRES INTO 116 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND SIX (6) OPEN SPACES LOTS WITH THE MODIFICATIONS TO CONDITIONS NO. 11 AND 82. PAGE 5- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 20, 2003 3. Tentative Ttact Map No. 30754 Vice Chauwoman Matthies opened the Public Hearing at 6:45 PM xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that the item befoxe the Coimnission is a xequest fox a Tentarive Txact Map No. 30754, and xequested Seniox Plannex Morita to xeview it with the Conuzussion. Seniox Plannex Morita indicated that the pxoject befoze the Comnussion is fox appmval to subdivide 35-acxe azea into 146 sepaxate lots fox single-family detached xesidential lots and open spaces within the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. He indicated that the City Council and Plamiiiig Cominission appxoved an Amendment to the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Tentarive Parcel Map No. 30962 in May of tlvs yeax. Seniox Plannex Morita indicated that Staff suppoxts the pxoposed Txact Map because the pxoject is consistent with the original 1989 Canyon Hills Specific Plan, xecent Amendment to the Canyon Hills Specific Plan, and Paxcel Map No. 30962. He stated that the proposed Txact Map would construct small lots. He indicated that the avexage lot size is 4,438 squaze feet. He noted that the original 1989 Canyon Hills Specific Plan and the xecent Amendment to the Canyon Hills Specific Plan show that the undexlying zoning fox the pxoject site is MF1 and MF2 and the pxoposed small lots would have been permitted with the original 1989 Specific Plan as with the xecent Amendment. Seniox Plannex Moxita stated that Staff xecommends that the Planning Conunission adopt a Resolution based on the Findings, E~ibits, and subject to the Conditions of Appxoval. He indicated that the applicant is pxesent to answer any questions that the Coiiunission may have. Vice Chairwoman Mattl~ies asked the applicant to appxoach the podium Mx. Jitn Stsingex, 1181 Califomia Avenue, Coxona CA indicated that he has xead the Condirions of Appxoval and agxees to all of them with the exceprion to Condirion No. 83. He stated that this xequixement would xequixe a"T" intexsecrion to a standaxd knuckle. He stated that it would take appxo~tnately 150 feet out of an e~cisting lot, which has been sold. He xequested that a poxtion of the lot be xemoved to accommodate a curve xadius fox the right-of-way. He also xequested addirional woxding to the Condirion. He suggested to add the following woxding; or ar othenvite determined by the City Engineer. Vice Chauwoman asked City Engineex O'Donnell his thoughts on the change. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that the lot on the coxnex is occupied by a homeownex and it would be necessary to take the land, in ordex to make the curve. He indicated that this would not be standaxd, and does not meet with the Rivexside County Road Depaztment Standasd, and the City would be opening themselves up fox lawsuits. PAGE 6- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 2Q 2003 Mx. Stiingex indicated that a possible solurion would be to leave the right-of-way xadius exacdy the way it is and just adjust the curve xadius. He xequested tune to woxk cvith the City Engineex on this issue. Thexe being no fuxthex comments fxom the Public, Vice Chauwoman Matthies xequested comments from the Cominission. Commissionex Uhhy asked Mr. Stringex what wexe the plans fox Holland Road. Mx. Stxingex indicated that Holland Road would be ie-xouted down to the new Canyon Hills Road. Commissionex Uhlry had no fuxtheT questions. Coimivssionex LaPexe xequested clarification on the woxding of Condirion No. 83. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that Condirion No. 83 would xead, The knuckle for L,ort Koad and Sj~rucezvood along tbe nortbave,rterly boundary aball be constructed in compliance with Aiverride County Boad Department Standardr, unlers othenvi re determined by tbe City Engineer. Commissionex LaPexe had no fi~thex comxnents. Commissionex Nash had no comments. Vice Chavwoman Matthies had no comments. Thexe being no furthex comments, Vice Chauwoman Matthies closed the Public Hearing at 6:55 PM and xequested the xeading of the Resolutions. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-39, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA. RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAl' NO. 30754 WHICH SUBDIVIDES APPROXIMATELY 35 ACRES OF THE CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN AREA INTO 146 TOTAL LOTS WITH THE MODIFICATIONS TO CONDITION NO. 83 BUSINESS ITEMS None INFORMATIONAL None PAGE 7- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 20, 2003 STAFF COMMENTS Community Development D~ectox Bxady commented on the following. • No comments. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Vice Cha~cvoman Matthies commented on the followinQ: • She wanted to advise the Coininission and Staff that she would not be avaIlable to attend the Plannuig Coinxnission Meeting scheduled for June 17. Coimnissionex Nash commented on the followinQ: • He wanted to commend Staff fox the hard woxk on tonight's pxojects. Commissionex LaPexe commented on the followin~: • He conc~xed with Coinmissionex Nash. Cotsunissionex Uhl~ commented on the following • He inquired about the Elsinoxe Motocxoss, and the possibility of the tracts being switched azound. Planning Manager Villa stated that each tract xequixes a specific type of bike to use based on the ridexs expezrise and noise that the bike genexatea He stated that the only way that the txacts could be switched axound would be to file fox an amendment to the plan. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 7:03 PM. ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~VICE CHAIRWOMAN, MATTHIES PAGE 8- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 20, 2003 Respectfully Submitted a~ ~~~~ DANA C. PORCHE' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CLERK TYPIST ATTEST: ~h7BERT A. BRADY, RETARY TO THE PLANNING COMM SION MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET T•AKF. ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, JUNE 03, 2003 The Regulax Planning Coxntrussion Meeting was called to ardex at 6:00 PM by Chaixman Bames. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Comnussionex Uhlry. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Bt1RNES, NASH, MATTHIES, LAPERE, AND UHLRY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Also present were Community Development Ditector Brady, Planning Manager Villa Deputy City Attorney Miles, City Engineer O'Donnell, Community Development Technician Hennings, and Community Development Clerk Typist Porche' PUBLIC COMMENTS None CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY MATTHIES SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. Minutes of Planning Comnussion Meeting - May 20, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 2002-10, and Desi~n Review for Industrial Pcoject No I 2002-07. Chaixman Barnes opened the Public Hea~ng at 6:04 PM and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development D~ectox Bxady stated that this item befoxe the Commission is a Continuance fxom the May 20, 2003 Plamiing Cotiuzussion. He indicated that this item is a Condirional Use Pexxnit and Design Review fox the construction of an industrial office PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 03, 2003 building, and xequested Plannuig Managex Villa to xeview it with the Cotnnussion, in the absence of Associate Plannex Millex. Planning Managex Villa indicated that this xequest is fox a CUP to allow an outdooT stoxage of fencing matexials and a Design Review of an industrial office building and othex xelated impxovement fox a wholesale fence distribution company. He stated that the applicant is pxoposing to construct a 1,000 squaxe foot industxial office building on appxoxitnately 1-acxe paicel. He stated that the Site Plan notes that the fxont pasking asea, xeax driveway and stoxage yaxd axea would be covexed with cnxshed miscellaneous base, but the Conditions of Approval xequixes that the entixe xeax yaxd axea be covered with asphalt. He noted that chain link fencing matexials would be stoxed in this axea. He stated that the driveway appxoaches at both Minthoxn Avenue and Colliex Avenue would be constructed in decoxarive concxete. Planning Manager Villa indicated that an e~cisting towing business is located on the adjacent pascel. He indicated that the applicant pxoposed to enclose the stoxage azea with a 6-foot "slump stone" block wall. He stated that if the existing wall is less than 6 feet, then the applicant would be xequixed to add "split face" block to bring the wall into compliance with the ininiinum xequixements of the LEMC. Planning Managex Villa xequested that Plannuig Commission appxove and adopt a Resolurion based on the Findings, Exhibits, and Condirions of Appxoval. He indicated that the applicant is present to answex any quesrions that the Coizuzussion may have. Chauinan Baxnes indicated that this is a Public Hearing and xequested comments from the Public. Thexe being no comments from the Public, Chaixxnan Baxnes xequested that the applicant appxoach the podium. Kiin Quon, 506 West Gxaham Avenue, Lake Elsinore indicated that he is the axchitect of the pxoject. He indicated that he would like to discuss a few issues with the Coimnission. He stated that Condirion No. 6 discusses the dxiveway azeas and stoxage axea be paved cvith asphalt paving, and that gxavel ox othex material would not be allowed. He xequested that a cxushed miscellaneous material be used instead of paved asphalt. He indicated that using the croshed miscellaneous material would help with ~ainage. He noted that the crushed miscellaneous matexial would be used in the stoxage axea only, just passed the stoxage gates. Planning Managex Villa stated that the xeasoning behind using the asphalt vexsus using othex matexials is fox the duxability. He indicated that Staff would pxefex to asphalt the entixe area, which would allow the watex to dxain into the stxeet. Coinmissionex Uhlry indicated that he has concerns with this xequest. He indicated that he is familiax with situarions whexe moist~e builds up undex the asphalt seeping from the un- paved axea, which caused the asphalt to bxeak up. Mx. Quon indicated that the applicant would abide by the Condition, should the Comuiission not agtee to the change. PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 03, 2003 Mx. Quon stated that xegasding Condirion No. 9, he xequested that the Cotrunission allow the applicant to use slump stone instead of split face block wall as it is less expensive and has also xequested to have the slump stone painted instead of using an anti-graffiri material. N~. Quon indicated that the last request would be to xeconsidex Condirion No. 28 whexe it discusses a 40-foot dedication along the frontage of Colliex Avenue fox a 100-foot street right-of-way. He xequested that the City Engineex and the applicant discuss it fi~thez. Mx. Quon had no fuxthex comments. Chauman Bames xequested any othex Public comments. Heaxing no fuxthex comments fxom the Public, Chaiunan Baxnes bxought the discussion back to the Coinmission far comments. Coimnissionex LaPexe indicated that he is not in favox of changing Condition No. 6. He indicated that the C~culation Element of the Genexal Plan calls fox 100-foot stxeet xight-of- way, and unfoxtunately, the Commission could not change this, unless an amendment is filed and appxoved by the City Council. He had no fi~thex comments. Conuivssionex Nash stated that concexning Condirion No. 6, he xealizes the cost involved having almost a quaxtex of an acxe asphalted. He stated that he does not have a pxoblem with using cxushed miscellaneous base. He indicated that he also does not have a pxoblem with the applicant using slump stone instead of split face block. Planning Managex Villa indicated that the puxpose of using the split face block was to keep the consistency of the e~cisting block wall. He stated that the applicant would also need to bxing the wall up to 6 feet, to xeduce the visibility of what is being stoxed. Coinuvssionex Nash asked if the existing wall wexe only 5 feet, would the applicant be Tequixed to teax down the wall, and xeplace with a 6-foot wall. Planning Managex Villa indicated that the applicant would only need to bung the wall up to 6 feet. Coimnissionex Nash advised Mx. Quon that the Comnussion could not do much to change Condirion No. 28, as it is in the Genexal Plan. Commissionex Nash had no fuxthex coxntnents. Vice Chauwoman Matthies concuxxed with Cominissionex Nash on the wall issue. She indicated that the use anti-gxaffiri paint is not a good choice fox masonry. She indicated that she would pxefex to use paint. She also stated that unfoxtunately the Planning Coinmission could not change Condirion No. 28. She had no fuxthex comments. Cotrunissionex Uhlry stated that he has akeady discussed with the applicant Condition No. 6. He suggested a concxete ribbon to avoid excess moist~e. He indicated that concexning Condirion No. 9, he indicated that he has no objecrion to adding anothei foot of block wall PAGE 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 03, 2003 to br~ng it up to 6 foot and using the split face block fox consisting. He had no fuxthet comments. Cha.uman Barnes indicated that he agxeed with the applicant on the use of the crushed miscellaneous base, and it would be the applicant's xesponsibility to maintain the asea. He stated that he howevex would like to see a paved entxance. He indicated that Condirion No. 9 still needs to be clarified befoie the Commission can move fonvaxd. He stated that he agxees cvith Vice Chainvoman Matthies on the use of anri-gxaffiu paint. He concuxxed with the Commission on the 40-foot dedication, and leave Condirion No. 28 as is. Coinmissionex Nash indicated that a decision still needed to be made on Condirion No. 6, whexe it discusses the block wall. He commented that he a~ees with the applicant on the slutnp stone. Chautnan Basnes indicated that slump stone has the look of adobe block, yet easiex to paint. He stated that the City has alxeady made coininitrnent to othex pxojects and need to srick to the split face block. Community Development Dixectox Bxady suggested having the Condirion xe-woxded to say that all fence.r and wall.r around the project rite ,rhould be at leart 6 feet in height. He indicated that anothex sentence should be added to say that masonry wall and pilaster should be conrtructed of .r~lit face. Community Development Dixect Bxady asked the Cotiitirission if they would like to add ox delete the use of the anri-gxaffiti paint. He indicated that it is normally a standaxd xequ~ement. Vice Chauwoman Matthies stated that she does not like the pxoduct at all. She xequested to delete the use on gxaffiri paint altogethex. Coimnissionex LaPexe indicated that all othex pxojects have had to use the anti-gxaffiri paint, and that the Counnission should be consistent. Vice Chauwoman Matthies asked if the Coimnission if this cookie-cuttex Condition wexe xevised to xead, "paint" and not "anri-~affiri pain~', as the anti-graffiti paint is not a good pxoduct. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that this pxoject is going befoxe the City Council, and duxing that time, the Cominission could indicate to the Council the xecommendations to this paxticulax item. Comnussionex Uhlry asked Chauinan Baxnes about Condirion No. 6. Chauman Baznes suggested to leave the Condition as is. Commissionex Nash concuxxed. PAGE 5- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 03, 2003 Cotnnussioner Uhlry concuxxed. He suggested that fuxthex study should be necessary befoxe making a decision to xevising Condirion No. 9 and aftei it goes to the City Council. The Corrunission agxeed. Community Development Dixector Bxady suggested to have Condirion No. 6 xevised to xead that the entire parking area and drivezvay area rball be paved vrith a.~halt paving. Gravel or rimilar material zvould only be alGrwed for the rtarage area. Commissionex Uhlry asked if the woxd "cnished miscellaneous base" be allowed instead of the woxd "gxavel." Community Development D~ectox Bxady agxeed. Chaixman Bames indicated that all othex Conditions would xemain as is. Thexe being no furthex comments fxom the Comnussion, Chairman Baxnes closed the Public Hearing, and xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-40, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA. APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2002-10 FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE FOR AN INDUSTRIAL USE INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. I 2002-07 LOCATED BETWEEN COLLIER AVENUE AND MINTHORN AVENUE- APN 377-190-004 TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS AS MENTIONED. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-41, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA. RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF T.AKF ELSINORE APPROVAL OF DESIGN REVIEW FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. I 2002-07, TO BE LOCATED BETWEEN COLLIER AVENUE - APN 377-190-004. BUSINESS ITEMS 3. Design Review of Residential Project No. 2002-11- Four Manufactuced Homes to be located at 208. 210 and 212 Mohr Street and ]311 Heald Avenue. Chaixman Baxnes indicated that this item is a Business Item, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. PAGE G- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 03, 2003 Community Development Dixectox Bzady stated that the item before the Coininission is a xequest fox foux Manufact~ed Homes to be located in the Historic Ovexlay District, and xequested Community Development Technician Hennings to review it with the Comnussion. Community Development Technician Hennings stated that this pxoject is a xequest fox Design Review of foux manufact~ed homes to be located in the Historic Ovexlay Disuict. She indicated that 3 of the homes would be located on Mohx Stxeet and the fouxth would be located on Heald Avenue. She stated that the homes xange fxom the smallest at 1,222 squaxe feet, and the l~gest is 1,510 squaxe feet. She noted that each home xesembles Cxaftsman Style axchitectuxe. She indicated that each home would have a full front poxch and an attached gasage. She noted that a coxxection should be made to the Staff Repoxt. She stated that on page 3 of page 12 on paxagzaph 4, it should xead Section 15332, Class 32, Section 15332 exempts the Infill Development. Community Development Technician Hennings stated that the applicant would pxovide a 6- foot high block wall along Davis Street, and all othex side and xeax yaxds would have a 6-foot high wooden fence. She indicated that the pxoject has met all the muvinum xequixements of the LEMC and the Histoxic Elsinoxe Design Guidelines. She indicated that the applicant has made a xequest to have futare manufactuxed homes, such as these to be appxoved administxarively, xathex than going tl~ough the Planning Coininission. She indicated that Staff suppoxts the appxoval of the pxoject, and xecommends that the Couimission adopt a Resolution of this project, based on the Findings, E~ibits, and Conditions of Appxoval. She indicated that the applicant is pxesent to answex any questions that the Coisunission may have. Chairman Baxnes xequested comments fxom the Public either for ox against the pxoject. Michael O'Neil, 1403 Heald Avenue, Lake Elsinoxe, CA inquixed about Plan 3. He indicated that the cuxxent maxket pxices foT the homes in the asea axe in the xange of $220,000. He asked what the selling p~ce would be fox these homes. Laxry Costales, 214 Mohx, Lake Elsinore, CA, stated that a manufactuxed home is one-step above a teailex/mobile home. He indicated that some of the homes in the axea of the 3 manufactuxed homes aze custom built homes and is concexned with the quality of these manufactuxe homes. Tun Flemining, 17970 Lakeshoxe Dxive, Lake Elsinoxe, CA stated that his back~ound is in Axchitectaral Design and has some concexns with the futuxe of the City. He stated that he is not in favox of manufactured homes. He indicated that one example is a manufactured home on Pottery, at the intexsecrion of Chaney and Townsend. He stated that it looks like a mobile home. He asked if the manufactuced homes wexe to include landscaping. Mx. Flenuiung indicated that prospecrive landownexs axe coming in with inexpensive home ideas, at inexpensive prices, and does not want to see this in Lake Elsinoxe. He indicated that he would like to see uniformity, and consistency in the City, and hopes that the Planning Commission has a Mastex Plan, and follows t~ough with it. PAGE 7- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 03, 2003 Chairman Barnes asked if anyone else wished to speak fox ox against the pxoject. Hearing no furthex comments, Chauman Baxnes xequested the applicant to appxoach the podium. Delco Hagan, applicant fox the pxoject He stated that at this time, the prices fox the homes have not been set. He stated that these homes come from the factoxy, and do not have any cxacks the drywall, and axe very well put togethex. Mx. Hagan stated that he completed the home that was mentioned on the cornex of Pottery and Townsend. He stated that he did not fuush the home, as the ownex was to fuush it. He indicated that he is suxpxised that the home is not finished yet, as he completed his wark ovex foux months ago. He stated that he also did the house on Lakeshoxe and Townsend. He indicated that this home does not look like a manufactuxed home. He indicated that the comment made earliex with xegaxds to the fact that it is easy to get homes in Lake Elsinoze because it is fast and easy is not true at all. He stated that the City is not that easy to woxk with, ox is a speedy process. He indicated that Lake Elsinoxe is the most difficult City to deal with, as fax as titning to get appxoval, and issuing permits. He stated that the advantage of a manufactuxed home is that they axe fastex to put up; thexe is no theft ox anyone being injuxed on the job. IV~. Hagan indicated that about the size of the home on Heald and Davis is 1,522 squaxe feet He stated that he has a few quesrions xegaxding the Condirions of Appxoval. He stated that Condition No. 22 indicates that a 6-foot block wall needs to build along Davis Stxeet, which would be impossibility, due to the size of the lot. Community Development Technician Hennings clarified that the set back would be 20 feet fxom the fxont propexty line. l~. Hagan undexstood. l~. Hagan asked how fax from the sidewalk should the wall be. Planning Managex Villa indicated at the pxopexty line. N~. Hagan asked about Condition No. 32. He indicated that the Condition discusses a dtainage easement to dxun the suxnp axea into the alley. He indicated that his engineex woxked with the City Engineex. He indicated that the tl~ee lots that axe along Mohx Stseet set low, and he would be bringing in 4 yazds of dixt, which would xaise the level, which would allow the lots to ckain towaxds the stxeet, and thexefoxe an easement would not be necessary. Lasdy, N~. Hagan adckessed the TUMF fess issue. He indicated that he is stsongly against the fee. He stated that it would cost him an addirional $26,000. He indicated that he should have been norified of this fee in the beginning. He asked the Coimnission, what could he do to avoid this. Chaixman Barnes indicated that this fee is unavoidable. PAGE 8- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 03, 2003 Mx. Hagan stated that the City should have norified him of this TUMF Fee, as he wasn't awaxe of it, and would have appreciated some kind of norice advising him of the TiJMF Fees. Commissionei Uhlxy stated that he could not believe that he was unawaie of this fee, as every developex who is woxking with the City knows about the TUMF Fee. He stated that the TUMF Fee have been in discussion fox ovex a yeax and was surprised to heas of this. Mx. Hagan xequested that the Planning Comnussion appxove the request to have these homes seroe as models, and any furi~e manufactared homes that are siinilax to these homes, be appxoved administxarively. Chaixman Baxnes indicated that he would pxefex to have the homes come to the Plannuig Coimnission fox appioval, until he can see one of the homes completed. Mx. Hagan indicated that once the homes have been completed, he would again make this xequest. Chaixman Barnes asked the applicant if he has read all of the Conditions and agxees to them. Mx. Hagan indicated "yes." Chaixxnan Barnes asked if anyone else wished to speak fox ox against the project. Thexe being no fuxthex comments, discussion was bxought back to the Conniussion fox comments. Comnussionex LaPexe indicated he concurs with Chairman Barnes on the xequest of having the futuxe manufactured homes xeviewed adininistratively. He stated that he would like to see the homes fixst, befoxe he would considex appxoval. He indicated that he likes the looks of the homes. He asked the applicant if a is a time limit was set on how long the homeownex has to complete the job. Mx. Hagan stated "no." Commissionex LaPexe suggested having it menrioned in the Condirions of Appxoval. He asked the Community Development Dixectox Bxady if the Planniug Commission could do anything that would help assuxe that the homes ase completed within a xeasonable period. Community Development Dixectox Bxady suggested that Deputy City Attorney Miles answex the quesrion. Deputy City Attoxney Miles indicated that thexe is a lot of lead way given to a xecipient of a building pernvt. PAGE 9- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 03, 2003 Commissioner Nash addressed the comment of the concerned xesident who indicated that he would pxefex not to see manufactuxed homes in the City. He mdicated that the City could not pxohibit manufact~ed homes. He indicated that manufactuxed homes axe xequixed to meet the same standaxds as a stick built home. He had no f~thex comments. Vice Chaitwoman Matthies concuxs cvith Conuivssionex Nash. She wanted to bring the Coininission attenrion to Condition No. 22 whexe it discusses that all wood fencing shall be painted ox treated to pxotect against weatherizarion and staining fox ixrigation ovex-spxay. She stated that theie is no mention of anti-gxaffiti paint in this Condition. She indicated when discussing walls, the Conditions should be consistent and had no fiitther comments. Commissionex Uhlxy wanted to adckess Ms. Costale's comments on the quality of homes. He indicated that manufact~ed homes axe xequixed to meet the same standards as a srick built home. He stated that most of the manufactuxed homes in the City axe consttucted so well, that you cannot even tell that it is a manufact~ed home. He stated that he is in favox of the pxoject and had no fi~thex comments. Chaixinan Barnes stated that most of his concexns have akeady been addxessed, and had no fuxthex coxnments. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that he would like to ad~ess the drainage issue that the applicant discussed eaxliex. He stated that he would like to add Condition 52, that would state that if the applicants engineer can verify tbat the run off into the rump area mill not increare from the undeveloped condition, Condition 32 may be avaived, subject to the approval af the City Engineer. Commissionex Nash asked Mx. Hagan if this new Condition was acceptable. l~. Hagan agxeed. Thexe being no fuxthex comments fxom the Coininission, Chautnan Barnes xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-42, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA. APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. 2002-11 - FOUR MANL7FACTURED HOMES TO BE LOCATED AT 208, 210, AND 212 MOHR STREET AND 1311 HEALD AVENUE, TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OF CONDITION NO. 52 INFORMATIONAL None PAGE 10 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 03, 2003 STAFF COMMENTS Community Development Dixectox Bxady commented on the following. • Thexe is going to be a Study Session xegaxding the budget on June 5 at 2:OQ and the Hayhuxst Study would be held on the same day, at 4:00 PM and the Comnussion is welcome. • There is going to be a Study Session xegaxding the MSHCP, and the Coinmission is welcome. • He advised the Commission that the City has hixed an Engineexing Technician named Cuxris Pexry, and would be a gxeat help to the Engineering staff. • He also cvished Community Development Clexk Typist Poxche' a Happy Bixthday. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chairman Barnes commented on the followinQ: • He wanted to wish Associate Plannex Millex a speedy xecovery, and hopes that she will get bettex soon. Vice Chaitwoman Matthies commented on the followinQ: • She wanted to advise the Comnussion and Staff that she would not be available to attend the Planning Coimuission Meeting scheduled fox June 17 or be able to attend the two Study Sessions. • She asked what could be done to have the City hixe moxe Police. She indicated that thexe is a gxeat need far them. Commissionex Nash commented on the followinQ: • He wanted to commend Staff fox the patience they had fox tonighPs meeting. Coinnussionex LaPexe cominented on the followin • He iesponded to Vice Chaixman Matthies comments on the incxease of Police. He stated that the new budget calls fox an incxease of 4.3 officexs added to the City. • He wanted to thank Staff fox the haxd woxk they have done with all of the pxojects. • He wished that Associate Plannex Linda Millex gets bettex. PAGE 11 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 03, 2003 Commissionex Uhlxy commented on the follouring • He indicated that a private citizen who lives on Marich had contacted him about a block wall, and it doesn't look ]ike the City would have permitted the block wall as the way it stands. Community Development Directox Bxady indicated that the City's Code Enfoxcement is awaxe of the situarion, and is c~xendy woxking on it. • He wanted to wish Linda Miller a speedy xecoveiy. • He pointed out that even though the City is xequesting 43 moxe Police Offices, it does not include Motoxcycle Officexs that would assist in teaffic situarions. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY MATTHIES, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 8.00 PM. CHAIRNLAN, JOHN BARNES Respectfully Submitted ,~.~~~. e D~~.~ ° DANA C. PORCHE' COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT CLERK TYPIST ATTEST: ~OBERT A. BRADY~CRETARY TO THE PLANNING COMM SION MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, JUNE 17, 2003 The Regular Planning Commission Meeting was called to oxdex at 6:00 PM by Chairman Barnes. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Coxntiussionex Uhhy. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, NASH, LAPERE, AND UHLRY MATTHIES Also ptesent were Community Development Director Brady, Planning Manager Villa, City Attorney Leibold, City Engineer O'Donnell, Senior Planner Morita, Community Development Technician Hennings, and Community Development Clerk Typist Porche' PUBLIC COMMENTS None CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY LAPERE SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. Minutes of Planning Cominission Meeting - June 03, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Amendment to Lake Elsinoce Municipal Code Chaptet 1717 Concernin~ Second Dwelling Units: Amendment to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapters 1? 19~ 17 20 17.22 and 17.23 to be consistent thexewith. Chairman Baxnes opened the Public Heasing at 6:02 PM and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that the item befoxe the Planning Cointnission is an amendment to the Municipal Code xegazding the construcrion of second dwelling units on xesidenrial pxopexties. He stated that the City's Code cuxxendy allows PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 17, 2003 second units tl~ough a conditional use pextnit pxocess; howevex, the new law would have them handled adtiunistearively. He stated that the law would be changed effective July 1, 2003 undex AB 1866, which would amend xegularion of the ability to regulate second units on single-family lots. He stated that City Attorney Leibold could explain in detail what this new law would entail. City Attorney Leibold indicated that the City has pxoposed a series of standaxds that would have to be met and evaluated adwinistxarively. She stated that the City is xeqixiviig the second unit to have one enclosed paxking space far each beckoom, and would be subjected to ma~nutn size xequirements, and cannot infringe upon the setback xequixements fox the applicable zone. City Attorney Leibold had no fuxthex comments. Chaurnan Baxnes xequested comments fxom the public. Thexe being no comments fxom the public, Cha.utnan Barnes bxought the discussion back to the Coimnission fox comments. Commissionex Uhhy asked if the law is applicable to Genexal Law Ciries ox Chaxter Ciries. City Attoxney Leibold indicated that Chaxtex Cities axe subjected to the same xequ~ements. Coinmissionex Uhlry asked if the ownex would be xequixed to occupy both units. City Attorney Leibold indicated that the law prohibits the City to dictate who occupies the second unit. She stated that the City can xequixe the applicant to be the owner occupying the pxopextp, eithex the first ox second unit and would be ceztified annually. Chauman Baxnes asked what the rime limit fox the cextificauon is City Attoxney Leibold indicated "foxevex." Chautnan Bames asked what would happen if the units were sold. City Attoxney Leibold stated that the units would have to be sold togethex, not sepaxately. Coimnissionex Nash asked what the building xequitements axe. City Attoxney Leibold stated that the building xequixements would follow what the lot is zoned fox, and would need to follow the setback xequ~ements, and minim~ space xequixements. Coinuzissionex LaPexe asked who would be issuing the annual cexrificarion. City Attoxney Leibold indicated that this is a new pxoceduxe, and would be handled administratively. Chaixman Barnes asked if this new law would ovexride the HOA ox CCR's. City Attoxney Leibold stated that tl~is quesrion is still an issue. PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 17, 2003 Commissioner LaPexe asked what would happen if the applicant wexe tuxned down. City Attoxney Leibold indicated that this is also an issue. Chairman Barnes asked if the Coininission had any fuxthex comments. There being no fi~thex comments, Chaixman Baxnes closed the Public Hearing and xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-43, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA. RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF T•AKF ELSINORE ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RESTATING CHAI'TER 17.17 OF THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SECOND DWELLING UNITS AND AMENDING CHAPTERS 17.19, 17.20, 17.22 AND 17.23 OF THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE TO BE CONSISTENT THEREWITH. 3. Conditional Use Permit No. 2003-06 and Miscellaneous Project No. 2003-01 Chavtnan Basnes opened the Public Heaiing at 6:24 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development D'uectox Bxady stated that the item befoxe the Coixuiussion is a xequest of an expansion to an e~cisting outdoox stoxage facility, and xequested Coxnmunity Development Technician Hemungs to xeview it with the Coinmission. Community Development Technician Hemiings indicated that this is a xequest fox a Design Review and Condirional Use Pernut appxoval fox Machado Stoxage, located at Lakeshoxe beriveen Machado and Clement. She stated that the original stoxage facility was constructed in the eaxly 1990's. She indicated that the e~sting stoxage facility consists of nine stoxage buildings totaling 30,680 squaxe feet, a 1,800 squase foot xental office, and a 350 squase foot mobile home fox the caxetakex. Community Development Technician Hennings indicated that the Design Review is fox fo~ new buildings totaling 21,150 squaxe feet on an appxoxixnately 1-acxe vacant pxopexty located d~ecdy adjacent to the e~cisting facility. She indicated that the applicant would construct a suc-foot high block wall along the Teax pxopexty line and a suc-foot high block wall with pilastexs along the front pxopexty line. Community Development Technician Hennings indicated that the Conditional Use Permit is being xequested fox the e~cisting facility in the G1 Neighboxhood Commexcial Distdct. She stated that the expansion pxopexty is dixecdy adjacent to the facility and is a xectangulax shaped naxxow & deep lot. She noted that based on the s~xounding uses and the PAGE 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 17, 2003 dimensions of the subject propexty, the expansion of the self-stoxage is a pxefexxed alternative for development of the pxopexty. Coxnmunity Development Technician Hennings indicated that Staff supports this pxoject and xecommends the Planning Conuiussion adopt a Resolution based on the Findings, Exhibits and is subject to the Conditions of Approval. She stated that the applicant is pxesent to answex any quesrions that the Commission may have. Chaixman Barnes xequested comments fxom the public. Thexe being no comments discussion was bzought back to the table fox Comnussionexs comments. Coininissionex Nash indicated that this is a pexfect choice of business fox this infill. He had no fuxthex comments. Commissionex Uhlxy indicated that he concuxxed with Coimiiission Nash. He asked the applicant if he has xead and agxeed with the Condiuons of Appxoval. Gary Pebley, 16401 Lakeshoxe Drive, Lake Elsinoxe, indicated that he agxees with the Condirions of Appxoval. Conunissionex LaPere thanked the applicant fox the lettex that he had xeceived. He indicated that he also agxees with the othex Cointnissionexs as a pexfect choice of business fox this lot. He had no fuxthex comments. Chaixman Baxnes had no questions fox the applicant. Thexe being no fuithex comments, Chautnan Baxnes closed the Public Heasing at 6:29 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-44, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT NO. 2003-01 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR BUILDINGS TOTALING 21,150 SQUARE FEET TO BE AN EXPANSION OF THE MACHADO SELF-STORAGE LOCATED AT 16401 LAKESHORE DRIVE (APN 379-250-010). MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-45, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-OG FOR THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING SELF- STORAGE FACILITY WINING THE C-1 ZONING LOCATED AT 16401 r.nrr~SHORE DRIVE, (APN 379-250-010). PAGE 5- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 17, 2003 BUSINESS ITEMS 4. Zone Code Amendment No . 2003-02, Chapter 17.18 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code cegarding densit,y bonuses. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that this pxoject has been xequested to be continued to Planning Coininission Meeting dated July 15, 2003. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE CONTINUANCE TO ZONE CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2003-02, CHAI'TER 17.18 TO THE JULY 15, 2003 REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION. 5. Residential Pxoject No. 2003-11, Design Review of Model Homes and Pcoduction Units for Tract Map No. 204921(The Willows~ Chaiunan Baxnes excused himself fxom the xemaining poxrion of the meeting at 633 PM due to a potenrial conflict of intexest. Coxsunissionex LaPexe acting as Cha~man xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox indicated that tlvs item befare the Commission is a Design Review of a Model Home Complex and Pxoducrion Units, and xequested Seniox Plannex Moxita xeview it with the Coinmission. Seniox Plannex Morita indicated that the pxoject is a Design Review of 99 single-family detached residential units, including a thxee-plan model home complex within a poxrion of Txact Map No. 30492, within the Canyon Hills Specific Plan asea. Seniox Plannex Moxita stated that the applicant is pxoposing tl~ee axchitectuxal designs, including Spanish, Italianate, and Txaditional axchitectuxal featuxes and tseatments. He indicated that the Model Home Complex would consist of tl~ee model homes, constructed on lots 2,3, and 4 and the paxking lot would be located on lot 5. He comments that Staff suppoxts the pxoposed Design Review and xecommends that the Planning Coimnission adopt a Resolurion based on the Findings, Exhibits, and is subjected to the Conditions of Appxoval. He indicated that the applicant is pxesent to answex any questions that the Cominission may have. Commissionex LaPexe asked if anyone wished to speak eithex fox ox against this pxoject. Thexe being no comments from the public, Commissionex LaPexe requested the applicant to appxoach the podium. He asked the applicant if he has xead and agxeed to the Condirions of Appxoval. Jim Stxingex, Dixectox of Community Development fox Pazdee Homes, 1181 California Avenue, Suite 103, Coxona CA indicated that he agxees to the Condirions of Appxoval. He PAGE 6- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 17, 2003 introduced Ron Nugxoho, 1~chitectuxal Cooxdinatox, and would be able to answex any quesrions that the Commission may have. Thexe being no fuxthex comments, Coimxussionex LaPexe bxought the discussion back to the Cointnission fox comments. Cormnissionex Uhlxy asked if the knuckle issue had been xesolved Mx. Stsingex indicated that the knuckle issue had been xesolved with Staff. Coxntnissionex Uhlxy had no fi~thex questions. Coimnissionex Nash had no quesrions ox comments. Cormnissionex LaPexe asked what the lot sizes wexe. IVIr. Nugxoho stated that the sizes of the lots xanged fxom the smallest at 6,000 squaxe feet to the laxgest at 15,000. Conuzussionex LaPexe asked what schedule they would follow, xegasding the woxk houxs. Mx. Stringex indicated that the constnxction would follow the City's nxles and xegulations of woxking houxs. Commissionex LaPexe asked if all the sub-contractoxs axe awaxe of the houxs. Mx. Stringex indicated "yes." Comtiussionex Uhlry asked the applicant when the bxidge would be built. Ivlx. Stxingex indicated that the construcrion of the bridge would begin at the next phase ox soonex. Cou7inissionex LaPexe had no fuxthex questions. Thexe being no fuxthex comments, Coininissioner LaPexe xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-46, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. 2003- 11 WHICH ENTAILS MII~OR DESIGN REVIEW OF A THREE-UNIT MODEL HOMES COMPLEX AND PRODUCTION UNITS WHICH WILL BE CONSTRUCTED THROUGHOUT 99 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 30492. PAGE 7- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 17, 2003 INFORMATIONAL None STAFF COMMENTS Community Development D~ectar Bxad~ commented on the following. • The City CouncIl held a Study Session today concerningt the Hayh~st Study. • Thexe would be a MSHCP on June 18, at 3:30 at the Cultuxal Centex. The County's xepxesentative would be at the meeting. • He will not be pxesent at the regulax Plannuig Commission Meeting on July 1, 2003. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Commissionex Nash commented on the followine: • He thanked Staff fox all the haxd woxk conducted on the pxojects. • He welcomed City Attoxney Baxbaxa Leibold to tonight's meeting. Commissionex LaPexe commented on the followine: • He concurxed cvith Commissionex Nash's comments. Commissionex Uhlry commented on the following • He indicated that thexe axe quality pxojects coming into the City, and stated that he appxeciates eveiyone haxd woxk. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 6:44 PM. / ~Ci/Ir _° ~-'~ CHAIRNI[1N, JOHN BARNES PAGE 8- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 17, 2003 Respectfiilly Submitted ~~- r ~ ~~,~ - DANA C. PORCHE' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CLERK TYPIST ATTEST: ~ OBERT A. BRADY ECRETARY TO THE PLANNING COM ISSION MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, JULY 01, 2003 The Regulax Planning Coimxussion Meeting was called to oxdex at 6:01 PM by Cha~man Barnes. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Coininissionex LaPexe. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, MATTHIES NASH, LAPERE, AND UHLRY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Also present were, Planning Managet Villa, Deputy Attomey Miles, Ciry Engineer O'Donnell, Seniox Plannec Morita, Project Planner ponahoe, and Community Development Clerk Typist Porche' PUBLIC COMMENTS N~. David Bakex, 20113 Rivexside Stxeet, Pexris stated his concexns with the dry weeds that suxxound his pxopexty. His indicated that the weeds have not been maintained and has concexns that a fixe could occux. Planning Managex Villa indicated that the City is c~xendy working on the contxol of the weeds. He advised Mx. Bakex to come down to the City Hall whexe he could ad~ess the issue fi~thex. Community Services D~ectox Sapp stated that the City would be hosting Disteict 28 All- staxs games, which would be held at the Marich Field. He stated that the game would be held every day until July 15, with the exceprion of July 4, due to the Holiday. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY LAPERE SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. Minutes of Planning Coininission Meeting - June 17, 2003 PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 01, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 25476 Revision No. 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 25477. Revision No. 1, Tentative Tract Map No. 25478, Revision No. 2, Tentative Tract Ma~ No. 25479, Revision No. 2 and Tentative Tract Map No. 30698 Chaixman Barnes opened the Public Hearing at 6:07 PM and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Planning Managex Villa stated that the item befoxe the Plamiing CoiTUTUSSion is a xequest fox subdivisions that encompass 5 Txact Maps within the Ramsgate Specific Plan, and xequested Pxoject PLnnnex Donahoe xeview it with the Coininission. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe stated that the item befoxe the Commission is a xequest fox appxoval to develop the f~st poxrion of Ramsgate. She indicated that the maps wexe originally appxoved in 1990, howevex xevisions have been made. She indicated that the pxoposal involves two applicants who ase pxesent this eoening. One applicant she stated is White Rock Acquisition Co, with Eastbridge Paxmexs. She stated that Mr. Shopoff is the Pxincipal. The othex pxopexty is owned by The Cluxman Company and is xepxesented by The Sauls Company. She stated that iV~. Sauls is pxesent this evening. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe stated that Ramsgate is located on the noxtheastern edge of the City, south of State Highway 74, and east of Intexstate 15, and west of Canyon Lake. She stated that covexs less than 1/3 of the axea designated as the Ramsgate Specific Plan. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe stated the original Ramsgate Specific Plan was appxoved in June 1984, the Fixst Amendment to the Ramsgate Specific Plan with a Development Agxeement, was appxoved in Maxch 1990. She stated that a Second and Thixd Amendment to the Specific Plan wexe appxoved in August 1990 and in Novembex 1991. She stated that the Thixd Amendment calls fox the development of 1,239 acxes into 2,909 single-family residences and 421 multi-family units fox a total of 3,330 units. She noted that the pxoposed pxoject seeks to develop five of the oxigiual nine maps with a diffexent xniY of lot sizes yielding an ovexall decxease in the nutnbex of units by 238. She commented that 427 acxes within the Wasson Canyon wexe sold to Riverside County earliex this yeax as paxt of the County's Multi-Species Habitat Conservarion Pxogxam. Project Plannex Donahoe stated that she bxiefly wanted to discuss the xevisions to the Tentative Maps. She stated that one xeason fox xevisions was the xealigmnent of SR 74. She indicated that the modificarion to 1"I'M 25479 was necessaxy because it now bisected the northexn posrion of this map. She stated that the commexcial acxeage fronting the SR 74 Highway has decxeased fxom 25.3 acxes to 15.8 acxes. She indicated that anothex xevision was to xeplace commexcial acxeage with single-family xesidential units in both TTM 25479 and TTM 25476, as pertnitted by the Ramsgate Specific Plan, elnninating a total of 20 acxes of neighboxhood and genexal commexcial uses. PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 01, 2003 Pxoject Planner ponahoe stated that the Lake Elsinoxe Unified School District xelocated the elementary school site fxom the western edge of 7"I1~I 25479 to the southem poxrion of TTM 25478, serving the heaxt of the single-family xesidences pxoposed by the pxoject and othex xesidenrial subdivisions to the south. She stated that the mirigation measuxes that addxess biologically sensitive habitat and fedexally listed d~eatened species found on the site have decreased the developable acxeage in 1"1'M 25476 and T'TM 25478. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe stated that the applicant was xequested to pxepaxe an Addendum to the Final and supplemental Envixonmental Impact Report. She indicated that Staff supports the pxoject, recommends appxoval of the Addendum, and xecommends appxoval of the maps to City CouncIl. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe state that she xeceived an email from Mx. Adel Abusamra who has pxopexty adjacent to the pxoject. She indicated that he suppoxts the pxoject. She also xeceived a lettex dated July 1 from Mx. & Mxs. Bartolotri who axe concerned with the obstrucrion of view fxom the~ paxcel, and the accessibility to the new development fxom the east end of 3xd Stxeet. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe wanted to discuss some of the Condirions of Approval fox TTM 30698. She stated that the applicant has some concerns with Condirion No. 25, xegaxding the access xoadways. She stated that a coxxection should be made to Condirion No. 26, that the TTM should be "30698" and not "25479". She indicated that the applicant has xequested to delete Condition No. 46, since the pxopexty does not fxont the Highway and delete Condirion No. 81, because this Condirion does not apply to this pxoject. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe stated that this concludes hex Staff Repoxt, and both the applicants axe pxesent to answex any quesrions that the Conuiussion may have. Chautnan Barnes xequested comments fxom the public. Ed Sauls, xepxesenting the applicant fox the Clunnan Company, 742 Siuxunit Dx, Laguna Beach, CA xequested the appxoval of the "1"1'M. He indicated that the~ legal counsel would address issues concexning Condition No. 25, and 87. Chaixman Baxnes asked the applicant if he has xead and agxeed to all of the othex Conditions. iVir. Sauls indicated "yes." Ken Kaplan, Attorney fox the Cluxman Company, 2532 Airport Drive, Iivine, CA indicated that he has constructed language fox Condition No. 25 fox TTM No. 30698 to xead: Puinaiy and secondaxy access xoadways shall be constructed priox to the issuance of building pexmits subject to approval of the City Engineer, Fire Dejiartment and Community Development Director. He stated that concemuig Condition No. 87 he suggested to add to the end of the Condirion the following language: j~rovided that the u[~jilicant may sati.rfy the foregoing Condition by offering the adjacent propery owner a lot-line adjurtment:vberein L.ot `~"becomes a part of the pmperGy of the adjacent otvner. PAGE 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 01, 2003 Pxoject Plannex Donahoe stated that should the applicant make the offex to the adjacent pxopexty ownex and it is xejected, then the City should Condirion a xequ~ement that the street stub at the map boundary. Mx. Kaplan indicated that should the adjacent pxoperty ownex not want to accept that lot, and then it becomes moot. Associated Plannex Donahoe stated then in that case, the City would want a xedesign to Open Space. IV~. Kaplan indicated that they would be happy to have it designed to Open Space. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that the steeet has to go to the boundary of the tract. Mx. Kaplan stated that they have xeached an agxeement with the adjacent pxopexty ownex to give him access to the street that they wexe going to put it in. He stated that the gxade is xelarively steep, and undexstood that the adjacent pxoperty ownex would put in unpxovements. He stated that should the City condirion TTM No. 30698, to unpxove it to the boundary, then thexe is no incenrive far him to live up to the oxal undexstanding, whexe he would build the unpxovements. Cha~man Barnes asked what would happen if the pxoject was built out and the adjacent pxopexty changed hands. IVIr. I{aplan stated that the lot line would be offexed to whomevex owns the pxopexty. Planning Managex Villa indicated that the pxoblem is that the adjacent pxopexty ownex is not pxesent at the meeting, and thexefoxe a decision cannot be made cvithout him pxesent. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe stated that in oxdex fox 1~. Abusaxnxa to build, he must have a pritnaiy, and secondary access. He would have a very long cul-de-sac, and the F~e Depaztment would not allow lum to constxuct moxe than a few homes. Thexefoxe, she indicated that he would need a secondaty access, and has appxoached Mx. Sauls xegaxding this, and that is how Lot G was cxeated. Mx. Sauls stated that this pxoject is going befoxe the City Council. He asked if the City Council could addxess this at the meeting when NIx. Abusa~a could attend the meeting. Associated Plannex Donahoe stated that the cul-de-sac was in the oxiginal design, and the xest of it was open space. Mx. Kaplan stated that they want to give Mx. Abusamxa evexy xight to develop his pxoperty with a secondary access. He indicated that they just don't want to pay fox it. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that the pxoblem with a cul-de-sac is the pxopexty would then be land-locked. PAGE 5- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 01, 2003 Couiinissionex Uhlry asked Mx. Kaplan if he wants to take the piece of pxopexty whexe it would noxmally be requiued to stub, and deed it to Mx. Abusamxa, and if Ms. Abusamxa wanted to develop his pzopexty, he may do so. Mr. Kaplan stated "yes." Coimnissionex Uhlxy stated that he wasn't s~e if that could be done. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that this would now change the boundaiy of the teact, and the txact is whexe the stxeet ends. He stated that eithex they agxee to a lot line adjustment whexe they move the bounduy of the txact and then it becomes the edge of the stteet, ox they build the street to the edge of the e~sting txact now. Deputy City Attomey Miles stated that "I" Stseet isn't xelarive to the cixculation element for tl~is development and is somewhat independent, and that we axe dealing with access to a land locked paxcel. He suggested an indemnificarion a~eement with the applicant with respect to any clauns about the adequacy of the xight-of-way of necessity ox what may arise between the thixd party. He stated that it could be warked on between now and the time this project goes befoxe City Council. City Engineex stated that it would be OK, just as long as the adjacent pxopexty ownex does not come forwaxd saying that the City did not pxovide him a sueet ox access. Mr. Kaplan stated that they axe willuig to indemnify the City and also agree that if the adjacent ocvnex does not accept the lot line adjustment that they axe willing to give that stub to the City, so that the City controls any potenrial liability. Coinmissioner Uhhy asked how Condirion No. 87 would be xead. Planning Managex Villa stated that Condirion No. 87 could xead, The apj~licant.rhall:vork uritb the adacentpropery ov~ner along Street I, topravide apprapriate aaecs to hirpraperly, a.r a rolution a lot line ad u,rtment may be required to j~rovide access. Deputy City Attoxney Miles suggested Condition No. 87 to xead the apjilicant .rball execute an indemn~cation agreement acceptable to the City Attorney, whereby the conrtructian of I Street is addressed thmugh the offering of a lot line adjurtment for Lat G ta the adjacent parcel awner. l~. Kaplan asked if this would xeplace Condition No. 87 ox amend it. Chairman Baxnes stated that it would amend Condirion No. 87. Coininissionex Uhhy asked City Engineex O'Donnell if he agreed. City Engineex O'Donnell asked what would happen if the adjacent pxopexty ownex xefused the offex. PAGE 6- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 01, 2003 Deputy Attorney Miles stated that the indemnificarion agxeement would addxess this. He stated that the othex oprion would be to give the City the oppoxtunity to ha~e it. Planning Managex Villa asked Mx. Sauls if this issue could be xesolved by the time this map goes to the City Council. l~. Sauls stated, "He hopes so." Chautnan Bames xequested if anyone else wished to speak xegaxding this pxoject. Mx. Edwaxd Fitzpauick, applicant, Eastbridge Paxmexs 114 Pacifica, Suite No. 345, Irvine, CA stated that he xeceived the copy of the Staff Repoxt along with the Addendum on Monday. Cha~man Barnes asked what is the standasd pxoced~es fox mailing the Staff Repoxt to the applicant. Planning Managex Villa stated that the standaxd pxoced~es for mailing Staff Repoxts, is to have them Fed-ex on F~day, priox to the Planning Coizurussion Meeting. Mx. Fitzpatsick stated that this pxoject has been in the woxks fox a while. He stated that he has owned this pxoject for si~c years. He indicated that he has ~afted a lettex to the Corrunission that is tcvelve pages, which addxesses issues with certain Condirions pextaining to all tract maps. Commissionex Nash stated that he would not be able to adckess any of the issues until he has had a chance to tharoughly xead each issue. He suggested that a continuance would be in oxdex, which would allow all pasties to have a chance to xead up on the necessary material. Chairman Barnes concuxxed with Conuzussion Nash to continue this mattex to the next Planning Coimnission Meeting on July 15. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe stated that membexs of the public came to this meeting to voice theix opuuon xegaxding this pxoject, and xequested the Commission to allow them to speak fixst, befare closing the Public Hearing. Chauinan Baznes agxeed and xequested comments from the public. Kathleen Oudaw, 28310 Txellis Lane, Pexxis CA stated that Eastbridge Paxmexs gave hex a legal docutnent to sign, which asks heT to pay fox the paving of hex paxt of Txellis Lane. She indicated that she xefused to sign the document. She indicated that she now has concerns with what might happen to Txellis Lane, what happened to the annexation, and if any sewexs, sidewalks and guttexs wexe ut discussion. Mx. Fitzpatxick with Eastbridge Paxmexs indicated that he went to l~s. Outlaw to discuss obtaining some gxading easements on hex pxopexty in oxdex to facilitate construcrion on Txellis Lane. He stated that during the eaxliex stages xegarding the oxiginal map they wexe to PAGE 7- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 01, 2003 build a fiill half section on theix side, and only one lane on the othex, and it would be the adjacent home ownexs' obligation to finish Txellis Lane. Howevex, since then Eastbxidge Partnexs has decided to pay fox the entixe constnxction to Txellis Lane, and it will cost Mxs. Outlaw nothing. He indicated that watex and sewex will go by hex front doox, should she decide to tie into it. Chauinan Basnes asked if anyone else cvished to speak on tl~is pxoject Dave Sapp, Community Seroices Dixectox, City of Lake Elsinoxe stated that although this item would be continued to the next Plamiing Coixunission meeting, he wanted to entex into the Recoxd that the Community Services Depastment foi the City does have some concems xegaxding the paxk as pxoposed, specifically regaxding the xetenrion azea. He indicated that the map shows that the xetention axea is paxt of the paxk site, and the City does not want this, nox will they be xesponsible to maintain it. He indicated that the HOA must maintain the dxainage. Coxrunissionex Uhlry asked Mx. Fitzpatrick if he has had a chance to look at the xetention axea in the park and had any comments. Mx. Fitzpatxick stated that it is not a xetention ox detention basin, but xathex a filtxation basin, and must xemain thexe pex the Santa Ana Regional Watex Quality Control Boaxd to filtex the watex runoff fxom the pask. Coininissionex Uhlry asked if the filtsarion basin could be moved to the xeas of the paxk. Mx. Fitzpatrick stated that he would like to have a chance to woxk on it befoxe making any decision. Chaixman Barnes xequested any fi~thex comments fxom the Public. Thexe being no fiudiex comments, Chaixman Baxnes closed the Public Hearing at 7:15 PM, and xequested Planning Managex Villa to xead the continuance pextaitiing to Tentarive Txact Map Nos 25476, 25477, 25478, 25479 and 30698 to the next Planning Commission Meeting of July 15, 2003. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE CONTINUANCE TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAI' NO'S 2547G, 25477, 25478, 25479 AND 30G98 TO THE JULY 15, 2003 REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION. The Planning Coinuiission took a five-minute xecess at 7:16 PM. The Planning Commission xeconvened at 7:29 PM. Commissionex LaPese excused himself fxom the xemaiuiug poxrion of the meeting at 7:29 PM. BUSINESS ITEMS PAGE 8- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 01, 2003 3. Residential Project No. 2003-07, Design Review of Model Homes and Pcoduction Units for Tract Map No. 30811(Auburn Lane~ Chaiunan Baznes excused himself from this parrion of the meeting due to potenrial conflict of intexest. Vice Chauwoman Matthies indicated that the next item befoxe the Coininission is a business item, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Planning Managex Villa stated that the item befoxe the Cominission is a xequest fox appxoval of a Residential Pxoject and xequested Senior Plannex Moxita xeview it with the Commission. SenioT Plannex Moxita stated that this is a Design Review fox 65 single-family detached xesidential units, to mclude a thxee-plan model home complex within Txact Map No. 30811. He indicated that Woodside Homes would be pxoposing thxee single-family detached model plans that would be constructed along the noxthwest comex of Lake Sueet at Oxange Gove Way. He stated the diffexent plans include a single-story 1,966 squaxe foot unit, and the othexs ase two-story units that a~e 2,517 square feet and 2,720 square feet He indicated that the tl~ee diffexent axchitect~al styles would include stucco, stacked stone, ox brick material along front elevations. Seniox Plannex Morita indicated that the only issue noted xelates to the peximetex wall intexface. He indicated that the Zoning Code xequixes that all tsact peximetex walls be concxete masomy block. He stated that when Staff viewing the txact map, it was noriced a variety of walls along e~cists the intexface. He stated Staff gave Woodside Homes some flexibility in meeting with the people befoxe they actually sat down and designed theiT fence plan. He noted that Woodside Homes met with some of the homeownexs, and unfoxtunately, a consensus could not be xeached. He indicated that Staff xefexxed back to the xequ~ement of the Zoning Code. Seniox Plannez Morita stated that Staff is suppoxtive of the pxoject and xecommends that the Planning Coimnission approve the pxoject based on the Findings, Exhibits, and is subject to the Conditions of Appxoval. Vice Chauwoman Mattl~ies xequested comments fxom the Public. Jack Mooxe, 29056 Palm View, Lake Elsinoxe stated that he commends the developex fox theix woxk, and hospitality. He indicated that he has taken a survey with most of the xesidents on Palm View, from Lakeside to Vista Way. He stated that the majority of the xesidents prefexxed a six-foot block wall. He stated that fox unifoxmity and the cost, it would be moxe beneficial to construct a foux-foot block wall topped with a 2-foot wxought ixon. John DeGange, 29078 Palm View stated that he too would pxefex a block wall. He suggested the Plamiiiig Coiiuiussion accept Staff's xecommendarion. He indicated that Staff has been very helpfixl to the Lake Texxace xesidents. PAGE 9- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 01, 2003 Sam Resnick, 1530 San Ponte Road, Coxona. He indicated that he owns pxopexty neax the pxoject and is concexned that he has not seen a hyckology xepoxt. He stated that he has spoken with Woodside Homes to see if he could get a copy of the xepoxt, but was unsuccessful. He xequested Staff norify him when a copy of the xeport would be available fox him to xeview. Chiis Willis, Woodside Homes, 23121 Antonio Paxkway, Rancho Santa Maxgarita stated that at one rime wood fences wexe going to be used, howevex they decided to construct block wall, as cost was neveL an issue, they just wanted to satisfy both paxries. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies asked Mx. Willis if he agxees with the Condirions of Appxoval. Mx. Willis stated that he would pxefex to xeview them f~thex, befoxe agteeing to the Conditions. Vice Chavwoman Matthies asked fox any furthex comments fxom the public. Heaxing no fi~thex comments, Vice Chaitwoman Matthies bxought the discussion back to the Conunission fox conunents. Commissionex Nash asked the applicant if they axe plamzing to xeplace the oxange trees. Mx. Willis stated "yes." Coimnissionex Nash stated that he would pxefex to see a combinarion wall thxoughout the pxoject. He stated that all else looks good. Coxnmissionex Uhlry concurxed with Coinmissionex Nash xegazding the block wall. He also asked IVIx. Willis if he has had a chance to discuss the hy~ology xepoxt with Sam Resnick. Mx. Willis indicated that he is unsure as to whexe the xepoxt is. Howevex, he indicated that he would look fox a copy of the xepoxt. He also indicated that he would pxefex to see consistency with the block wall, either have it enti~ely 6 foot block wall, ox a foux foot block wall with 2 foot wxought ixon. Howevex, he indicated that a suxvey was sent out to the homeownex, and he stated that on the noxth side, it was a combinarion wall, and that is how the Condition is wxitten. Vice Chauwoman Matthies indicated she appxeciated heaxing that the applicant met with the homeownexs xegarding the wall issues. She again asked the applicant if he a~ees to the Condirions of Appxoval. Mx. Willis indicated that he does not want to delay the pxoject any fuxthex, and thexefoxe agxeed to all of the Conditions of Appxoval. Seniox Plannex Morita wanted to clarify Condition No. 26 that discusses the 24" boxed oxange trees. He stated that the applicant has agteed to incxease the oxange txees from 28 txees to 36 teees. In addition he stated that he would like to add the language to the thixd PAGE 10 - PLANNING CONIMISSION MINUTES - JULY 01, 2003 bullet of Condirion No. 26 to xead, in addition, details and sections dercribing the sejiaration along tbe .cide.r of the double wallr rball also be j~rovided. Vice Chaixman Matthies asked the applicant if he agreed to this xevision of the Condition. Mx. Willis indicated that if they follow this revision of the Condirion, thexe would be a double wall, should someone leave theix wall up. He stated that the pxopexty line is about 2 to 4 feet off someone e~sting fence. Senioz Plannex Morita stated that thexe needs to be some capping, especially since it is going to be concxete block wall. He stated that if thexe is going to be a combination block wall along the ent~e intexface, then Condirion No. 28, Sth bullet would need to be xevised. He stated it should xead, ahow tbat the perimeter evall along tbe we.rtern boundary of the pmject .rite urill be a combination concrete block Wall (appro~imately four feet) vrith avraught imn (appro~imately tsvo feet) fencing, and totally delete and total concsete block wall, noxth and south of Oxange Gove Way, respectively. Vice Chauwoman Matthies asked the Couimissionexs if they have any othex comments. Heaxing no fuxthex comments, Vice Chaixwoman Matthies xequested that IV~. Jack Mooxe appxoach the podium. Jack Mooxe, 29056 Palm View, Lake Elsinoxe indicated that he has concerns with the end of the block wall at Mountain and the end of the block wall at Oxange Gxove. Couiinissionex Nash stated that the Commission has adc~essed this Jack Mooxe thanked the Conunission. Vice Chau~cvoman Matthies asked if anyone else wished to speak fox ox against tlvs pxoject. Heaxing no fi~thex comments, Vice Chaiiwoman Matthies xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-47, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA. APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. 2003-07 WHICH ENTAILS MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A THREE-UNIT MODEL HOME COMPLEX AND PRODUCTION UNITS WHICH WILL BE CONSTRUCTED THROUGHOUT 65 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 30811 WITH THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE MENTIONED CONDITIONS. PAGE 11 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 01, 2003 INFORMATIONAL Dana Poxche', Plannuzg Secretary fox the City of Lake Elsinoxe indicated that the BIA meeting would be held on July 9, at the Diamond Stadium and fox those who wish to attend the meeting, please contact Susan Reid at the City Hall, extension 204. STAFF COMMENTS Planning Managex Villa commented on the follourine. • No comments PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Commissionex Nash commented on the followin~: He thanked Staff fox all the hard woxk conducted on the pxojects. Cotsunissioner Uhlry commented on the following He wanted to infoxtn Planning Managex Villa that a home on Luceme Street has been opexating swuiunuig lessons to appxo~nately 130 students, which is conducted in two sessions. He xequested to ve~fy that the instructox is licensed. He also stated that the heavy traffic in the asea of the home axe also a concem. He asked the status of the fence along Hill Stseet. Planning Managex Villa indicated that the file shows that thexe was a pxevious nuisance abatement case against the homeownex due to issues with theix vehicles. He stated that Staff is cu~endy woxking on ways to mitigate the issue. Vice Chauwoman Matthies commented on the follocvine: • She commented that the pxoject on Gxand Avenue known as the "Reflecrions" still has not completed the landscaping along the wall on the south side. She indicated that the model homes have all been occupied and thexefoxe the landscaping should have been completed. Planning Managex Villa indicated that the City is xesponsible fox that axea, and is currendy waiting for additional funding. • She also wanted to infoxm the Plamiing Managex that the pxopexty on 405 W. Gxaham Avenue needs to have Code Enfoxcement check it out as lootexs axe going onto the pxopexty during the evening houxs. • She noted that Kellogg Steeet needs to be xepaved as well as the north side of the street. • She xeminded the Comuussion that she would like to have the use of anti-gxaffiti paint be elnninated ~om the City's standaxds, as she feels that it is not a good choice; paint woxks just as well, if not bettex. PAGE 12 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 01, 2003 ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 8:15 PM. /~J CHAIRMAN, JOHN BARNES Respectfully Subxnitted /E~~(~ 1 i / ~ J DANA C. PORCHE' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CLERK TYPIST ATTEST: ~tOBERT A. BRADY, SEf~Y2ETARY TO THE PLANNING COMMIS~ON MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET T•AKF ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, JULY 15, 2003 DUE TO TECHNICAL FAILURE OF THE RECORDER, THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REGULAR MEETING WILL BE BASED SOLELY FROM THE STAFF REPORTS AND NOTES TAKEN BY OFFICE SPECIALIST PORCHE'. The Regulax Planning Coimnission Meeting was called to oxdex at 6:07 PM by Vice Chairwoman Matthies. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Coimuissionex LaPexe. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: MATTHIES, LAPERE, AND UHLRY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NASH, BARNES Also present wete, Community Development Dixector Brady, Planning Manager Villa, , City Engineec O'Donnell, Deputy City Attorney Miles, Senior Planner Morita, Project Planner Donahoe, Associate Planner Miller, Community Development Technician Hennings and Office Specialist Porche'. PUBLIC COMMENTS None CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY LAPERE SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. Minutes of Planning Coimnission Meeting - July 1, 2003 PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 15, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Continued fxom the July 1, 2003 Plannin~ Commission Meeting Tentative Tcact Ma~ No. 25476, Revision No. 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 25477. Revision No. 1, Vice Chaixwoman Matthies opened the Public Hearing at 6:07 PM and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that the item befoxe the Coimnission is being continued fxom the July 1, 2003 xegular Plamung Coimnission Meeting, and xequested Pxoject Plannex Donahoe to xeview it with the Coimuission. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe indicated that the pxoject consists of the following: Tentarive Txact Map No. 25476 Revision No. 1, which would subdivide 104.4 acxes into 290 xesidential lots and 13 open space lots; Tentative Txact Map No. 25477, Revision No. 1, would subdivide 51.5 acxes into 213 xesidential lots and 10 open space lots; Tentative Txact Map No. 25478, Revision No. 2, would subdivide 106.7 acxes into 255 xesidenrial lots, 1 school site and 25 open space lots; Tentarive Txact Map No. 25479, Revision No. 2, would subdivide 137 acxes into 254 xesidenrial lots, 1 commexcial lot 2 multi-family lots, 1 community paxk site, and 13 open space lots, and lasdy Tentarive Txact Map No. 30698, formerly e~ixed Tentative Txact Map No. 25831 would subdivide 49.6 acxes into 158 xesidential lots and 6 open space lots. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe stated that Mx. William Shopoff and Mx. Edwaxd Fitzpatrick pxesented theix opposirion to the Condirions of Appxoval fox theix fo~ tentative tract maps, both vexbally and in a detailed lettex dated July 1, 2003, handed to the Coinuzission. She stated that because of the lengthy amount of infoxmation, the Coimnission and the applicant agxeed to have the item continued to the next meeting. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe indicated that the Coininission xeceived a lettex from Michael and Kimberley Baxtolotri who wexe concerned about the obstrucrion of the~ view if a perimeter wall is built fox the Ramsgate pxoject. She stated that Eastbridge Paxtnexs wexe also concexned that the perimetex-fencing xequitement did not xefexence the Specific Plan. She indicated that Staff has amended the Condition, to xefexence the Design Guidelines of the appxoved Specific Plan, and to xequ~e view fencing whexe views axe impoxtant. Pxoject Plannex Donahoe noted that Mx. Dave Sapp of the Community Seroices Depaxtment had concexns xegaxding the configuxation of the paxk, and did not want maintenance xesponsibiliries fox the xetention axea. She indicated that Ms. Fitzpatrick offexed to xealign the community park paxcel cvithin 'I"fM 25479. She stated that all the xetenrion axea shall be made a lettexed lot to be maintained by the homeownex's association. She noted that the multi family paxcel shall include the pxopexty along its southern boundary, and acxeage along its eastem boundary shall be included in Lot 256, making the community paxk site a moxe usable, cohesive paxcel. PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 15, 2003 Pxoject Plannex Donahoe stated that all but one Condirion xemain unxesolved between Staff and the applicant. She indicated that Condirion No. 90 of TTM 25476 xequested the applicant to pave Rivexside Stxeet from the eastexly boundaiy of TTM 25476 offsite to Gxeenwald fox two travel lanes. She indicated that the applicant assexts that the Specific Plan does not xequixe this xoadway extension, nox does the Txaffic Impact Analysis pxepaxed fox the Addendum. She stated that this extension would cxoss Wasson Canyon, wl~ich has not been appxoved, by the US Fish and Wildlife Seivice. She indicated that the Thixd Revision of the Ramsgate Specific Plan includes an Area C~culation Plan that shows Rivexside Stxeet connecting to SR 74 and Gxeenwald. She mdicated that thexe ase no xequirements ar condirions to implement the extension to Gxeenwald. She stated that the City's Genexal Plan Ciuculation Element shows Rivexside Steeet connecting to Gxeenwald, and the County of Rivexside xecommended that the extension be constructed in the~ response lettex to the Ramsgate pxoject. She stated that it is the City Engineex's concexn that once Rivexside Steeet is impxoved, the xesidents would use it to get to Gxeenwald, with ox without pavement, causing dust and othex nuisance issues fox the County. Pxoject Planner ponahoe indicated that Staff xecommends that the Planning Coimnission adopt a Resolurion, xecommending that the City CouncIl adopt Addendum No. 2 to the Final Supplemental Envixonxnental Impact Repoxt fox the Ramsgate Specific Plan, in accoxdance with Exhibit `M'. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies xequested NIr. Fitzpatxick to appxoach the podium. l~. Fitzpatrick indicated that he has had sevexal meetings with Staff and all went well. He stated that he still has a few issues with the Condirions of Appxoval. He suggested to modify Condirion No. 88, 89 and 90 of TTM 25476, Condirion 90 of T`TM 25477, Condition 92 of TTM 25478 and the Condirions that discuss the tsaffic signal at Txellis Lane in TTM 25479. Lasdy, he stated that he would like TTM 30698 to pazticipate in a faix shaxe basis, in the cost of the teaffic signals that affect that pxopexty as well as a fa~ shaxe basis of the development of the paxk. Vice Chainvoman Matthies xequested Mx. Sauls to appxoach the podiutn l~. Sauls thanked the Staff and the Coimiiission fox all the~ help with this pxoject. He indicated that he met with Mx. Abusamxa and would like to ad~ess Condirion No. 87 of T'I'M 30698 to xead as "the applz'cant shall conrtruct I Street, to the eartem boundary of the tract The final map shall be corrected to reflect thir requirement. The applicant sball con rtruct `7" Street to Lat `~" and a[~jilicant sball deed L.at `~"to Mr. Aburamra upon recordation offinal map. " Vice Chairwoman Matthies xequested Staff to ad~ess some of the concexns bxought up by the applicants. City Engineex O'Donnell indicated Cal-Txans must appxove Condition No. 90 of 'I"I'M 25479 whexe it discusses a traffic signal at Txellis Lane. Mx. Fitzpatxick stated that he would accept Condition No. 90 PAGE 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 15, 2003 Due to technical difficulties with the xecorder, a synopsis is provided from this point up to Item No. 3 Deputy Attorney Miles suggested to not unpose any additional Conditions xegazding Mawicio Avenue on TT'M 25477 and to re-wxite Condition No. 90. The Cominission agxeed. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies closed the Public Hearing at 7:21 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Resolutions. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-48, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CERTIFICATION OF ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RAMSGATE SPECIFIC PLAN. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-49, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAl' NO. 25476 REVISION NO. 1, LOCATED SOUTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 74, ONE MILE EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, AND WEST OF CANYON LAKE, (AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 349-240-001 AND -002; 349-420-001 AND -002; 349-430-006, -007 AND -008), A SUBDIVISION OF 104. 4± ACRES INTO 290 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 13 OPEN SPACE LOTS TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-50, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 25477 REVISION NO. 1, LOCATED SOUTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 74, ONE MILE EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, AND WEST OF CANYON LAKE, (AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 349-400-020 AND -021; 349-410-001, -002, 003, -004, AND -016), A SUBDIVISION OF 51.5 ± ACRES INTO 213 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 10 OPEN SPACE LOTS TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. PAGE 5- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 15, 2003 MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-51, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATNE TRACT MAP NO. 25478 REVISION NO. 2, LOCATED SOUTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 74, ONE MILE EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, AND WEST OF CANYON LAKE, (AND ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 347-110- 027 AND -028, 347-330-025 AND -048, 347-340-002, -006, -007, -008, -009, -010, AND - 0]3), A SUBDIVISION OF 106.7 ± ACRES INTO 255 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, ONE SCHOOL SITE AND 25 OPEN SPACE LOTS TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-52, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 25479 REVISION NO. 2, LOCATED SOUTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 74, ONE MILE EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, AND WEST OF CANYON LAKE, (AND KNOWIV AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 347-120-01G, - 017, -018, -020, -021, -022, AND -023), A SUBDIVISION OF ]37 ± ACRES INTO 254 RESIDENTIAL LOT, ONE COMMERCIAL LOTS, TWO MULTI-FAMILY LOTS, ONE COMMUNITY PARK SITE, AND 73 OPEN SPACE LOTS TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-53, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAI' NO. 30698 LOCATED SOUTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 74, ONE MILE EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, AND WEST OF CANYON LAKE, (AND HIVOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 347-110-022, -024, -025, AND -026), A SUBDIVISION OF 49.6 ± ACRES INTO 158 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, AND 6 OPEN SPACE LOTS TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. The Planning Coinmission took a five-minute xecess at 729 PM. The Planning Coimnission xeconvened at 735 PM. 3. Tentative Parcel Map No. 30985, Markham Develoument Management Gxoup, Inc PAGE 6- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 15, 2003 Vice Chaitwoman Mattl~ies opened the Public Heaxing at 7:35 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Report. Community Development Dixectox Bxady advised the Cominission that the applicant has xequested to have tlils item continued to the next regulax Planning Commission Meeting of August O5, 2003. Vice Chairwoman closed the Public Hearing at 736 PM and called fox a Morion. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONTINUANCE OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAl' NO. 30985 TO THE NEXT REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST O5, 2003. 4. Vice Chauwoman Matthies opened the Public Heaxing at 7:37 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that the item befoxe the Comnussion is a Design Review fox the drive-thru coffee shop known as Java Junction, and xequested Associate Plannex Millex to xeview it with the Coinmission. Associate Plannex Millex stated that the applicant is xequesting appxoval of an appxoxixxiately 420 squaxe foot drive-thru building. She stated that the pxoject would be constructed urithin the fxont southwest quartex of an e~cisting commexcial centex known as the Seex's Centex located on Rivexside Drive. She indicated that the building will seroe as a drive-thru and will pxovide one walk-up seroice window. Associate Plannex Millex indicated that the design is a Meditexxanean style of axchitectuxe that is siinilax to the building cvithiu the existing centex. She stated that the applicant pxoposes to use an eggshell stucco finish with bxown txim. She indicated that the ho~s of opexation would be from 4:00 AM to 5:00 PM, seven days a week, and would be manned in two shifts by three employees. Associate Plannex Millex xecommends that the Planning Coinmission adopt a Resolurion, appxoving the CUP No. 2003-02 fox a dxive thnx, and adopt a Resolurion and xecommend to the City CouncIl pxoject Commexcial Pxoject No. C 2003-02 based on the Findings, Exhibits and is subject to the Condirions of Appxoval. She indicated that the applicant is pxesent to answex any questions that the Coiutnission may have. Vice Chanwoman Mattlues xequested comments fxom the Public. Nortnan Hasris, 31070 Machado, Lake Elsinoxe, CA stated that he like the pxoject PAGE 7- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 15, 2003 Vice Chauwoman Matthies xequested the applicant to appxoach the podium. Wendy Lopez, 29330 Bxeakwatex, Lake Elsinoxe, CA thanked Staff, and would be able to answex any comments that the Coinnvssion may have. Thexe being no fittdiex comments fxom the Public, Vice Chaitwoman Mattl~ies bxought the discussion back to the Commission fox comments. Coimnissionex LaPexe asked ff indoar seating would be available. Ms. Lopez stated that tlus would only be a drive thxu. Cotsunissionex LaPexe had no fuxthex comments. Coxsunissionex Uhlxy asked the applicant if a walk-up window would be available. Ms. Lopez stated "yes." Coininissionex Uhlry had no fuxthex comments. Vice Chaiiwoman Matthies asked the applicant if she has xead and agxees to the Condirions of Appxoval. Ms. Lopez stated "yes." Vice Chauwoman Matthies closed the Public Heaung at 7:46 PM and xequested the xeading of the Resolurion. MOVED B.Y LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-54, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-02 FOR A DRIVE- THRU FOR A DRIVE UP COFFEE SHOP LOCATED AT THE SEERS CENTER ON RIVERSIDE DRIVE -(APN 379-090-020). MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-55, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECT NO. C 2003-02 FOR A DRIVE -THRU COFFEE SHOP LOCATED IN THE SEERS CENTER ON RIVERSIDE DRIVE -(APN 379-090-020). PAGE 8- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 15, 2003 5. Zone Code Amendment No. 2003-02, Chapter 17.18 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Regatding Density Bonuses. Vice Chauman Matthies opened the Public Hearing at 7:50 PM that this is a Business Item, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development D~ectox Bxady xequested that this item be continued to the Plamiing Comixiission meeting on August 19, 2003. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies closed the Public Heariug at 7:51 PM, and called fox a Morion. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONTINUANCE OF THE ZONE CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2003-02 TO THE AUGUST 19, 2003 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. BUSINESS ITEM 6. Residential Project No. 2003-10, Design Review of Model Homes and Production Units for Txact Map No. 30754 (Rivecbend~ Vice Chaiuwoman Matthies indicated that this is a Business Item and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that the item befoxe the Comtnission is a xequest to appxove 127 single-family homes within the Canyon Hills Specific Plan, and xequested Seniox Plannex Morita to xeview it with the Coimilission. Seniox Plannex Morita stated that this pxoject consists of 127 ptoduction units, including a thxee-plan model home complex, cvithin the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. He indicated that the homes xange in sizes from 1,683 squaxe feet to 2,101 squaxe feet. He stated that the applicant proposes tl~ee diffexent axchitectural styles fox the fxont elevarions, including Spanish, Italianate, and Txadirional. Seniox Plannex Morita indicated that Staff suppoxts the pxoposed Design Review based on the consistency with the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Tentarive Tract Map No. 30754, varied building materials and coloxs, and enhanced axchitectuxal treatments. He stated that Staff recommends the appxoval based on the Findings, Exhibits, and is subject to the Conditions of Appxoval. He noted that the applicant is pxesent to answex any questions that the Conunission may have. Vice Chauwoman Matthies xequested comments fxom the public PAGE 9- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 15, 2003 Ron Nugxoho, Axchitectuxal Managex fox Paxdee Homes, thanked the staff fox all of theix hazd woxk. He stated that he accepts all of the Condirions of Appxoval. Vice Chaiiwoman Matthies xequested any fuxthex comments fxom the public. Heaxing no fuxthex comments, discussion was bxought back to the Commission fox comments. Coxsusussionex LaPexe had no comments. Coimnissionex Uhlxy asked the applicant if the knuckle issue had been xesolved. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that the pxoject is curxendy in Plan Check, and thexefoxe assutned xesolved. Coimnissionex Uhlry had no fuxthex comments. Vice Chaixwoman Mattlues had no comments and called fox the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-56, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. 2003-10 WHICH ENTAILS DESIGN REVIEW OF A THREE-UNIT MODEL HOME COMPLEX AND PRODUCTION UNITS WHICH WILL BE CONSTRUCTED THROUGHOUT 127 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 30754. 7. Minor Design Review of a Single Family Residence located at 1G525 McPherson Avenue. Vice Chairwoman Matthies indicated that this item is a Business item, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Report. Community Development D~ectox Bxady stated that the item befare the Commission is a xequest fox a single-family home, and xequested Cotntnunity Development Technician Hennings to xeview it with the Cotrunission. Community Development Technician Hennings stated that the applicant pxoposes to construct a 1,184 square foot with a 460 squase foot attached gaxage and a 160 square foot covexed poxch to be located within the Country Club Heights asea. She indicated that the home would occupy appsoxitnately 13% of the 12,600 squaze foot lot. She stated that the homes would be tan textuxed stucco with white tsim, and the roof would be gray composirion tile. She stated that the applicant would pxovide fxont yaxd landscaping with an automaric spxinklex system, and a six-foot fence to scxeen the concxete pad. PAGE 10 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 15, 2003 Community Development Technician Hennings stated that Staff suppoxts the pxoject based on the Findings, Exhibits, and is subject to the Condirions of Appxoval. She indicated that the applicant is pxesent to answex any quesrions the Coimnission may have. Vice Chaitwoman Matthies xequested comments fxom the public. Office Specialist Poxche' indicated that she has xeceived two lettexs that would need to be entexed into the Public Recoxd. One, she indicated was fxom Tamaxa & Michael Goldsby at 16550 McPhexson Avenue and the othex is from Suzie Rupnow, 16520 McPhexson Avenue. She stated that both of the lettexs oppose the development of this home. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies asked if anyone else wished to speak in favox ox against the pxoject. Heaxing no fuxthex comments, discussion was bxought back to the Cointiussion fox comments. Coininissionex Uhhy asked about the fencing. Community Development Technician Hennings stated that a wooden fence would be constructed along the side of the house to scxeen the equipment and concxete txash pad. Comtnissionex Uhlxy asked if the fence would have a gate. Community Development Technician Hennings indicated "yes." Vice Chauwoman Matthies xequested the applicant to appxoach the podium. Pete Gallaghex, 30130 Puerto Vallaxta Way, Menifee stated that he is the buildex. He stated that he has xead and a~eed to all of the Condirions with the exceprion of Condition No. 12 whexe it discusses sewex. He stated that the axea is on sepric and not sewex. Community Development Technician Hennings agxeed with this exrox, and indicated that she would xeplace this Condition. Commissionex Uhlxy had no fuxthex comments. Comiznssionex LaPexe had no coxnments. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies had no coxnments. Thexe being no fuxthex comments fxom the Cointnission, Vice Chairwoman Matthies xequested the xeading of the Resolution. PAGE 11 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 15, 2003 MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-57, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 16525 MCPHERSON AVENUE (APN 378-203-083) TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS TO CONDITION NO. 12 INFORMATIONAL None. STAFF COMMENTS Community Develogment Directox Bxady commented on the following. • No comments PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Commissionex LaPexe commented on the followinQ: • He thanked Staff fox all the haxd woxk conducted on the pxojects. Commissionex Uhlxy commented on the followut~ • No comments Vice Chauwoman Matthies commented on the followinQ• • She commented that Ruth Townsend, who has been a long time xesident xecendy passed away. • No fuxthex comments. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 8:10 PM. PAGE 12 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 15, 2003 , L-~~n ~~ ~ "" I ~~ ~ VICE CHAIRWOMAN MATTHIES Respectfully Submitted, x~, c~ P~.~,' DANA C. PORCHE' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OFFICE SPECIALIST III ATTEST: R BERT A. BRADY, SEC TARY TO THE NNING COMMISSI MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, AUGUST 05, 2003 The Regulax Planning Comuiission Meeting was called to oxdex at 6:02 PM. by Corrunissionex LaPexe. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Coimnissioner Uhhy. ROLL C T.T. PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: NASH, UHLRY, & LAPERE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES & MATTHIES Also present were: Community Development Dixectox Bxady, Planning and Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa, City Engineex O'Donnell, Associate Plannex Millex, Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz, Community Development Technician Hennings, Office Specialist Poxche' and Deputy City Attomey Miles. PUBLIC COMMENTS Dave Sapp, Community Seroices Dixectox far the City of Lake Elsinoxe advised the Comnussion that the dedication to Potteiy Paxk has been changed to Satuxday, August 9, at 11:00 am. John Reid, 21625 Appaloosa Ct., Canyon Lake, CA expxess his concexns with the Watex Ridge Development wit6in the Lake Elsinoxe city limits, wl~ich boaxdexs his pxopexty line. He stated that the gxading that is being conducted has obstructed his view, and is not in conformance with the WC code. Community Development Directox Bxady stated that the City is cuxxendy woxking cvith the developex, which is Bxehm Homes, the POA of Canyon Lake and the City Engineex from Canyon Lake cvith xegaxds to some of the issues. Robext C. Millex 21587 Appaloosa CT, Canyon Hills, CA expxessed his concems with the Watex Ridge pxoject. He stated that in the xeax of his home, gxading fxom this pxoject has cxeated a 30-foot burm, with a 2-foot set back. He stated that he is concemed with dxainage issues, and potential flooding during the heavy xain pe~ods. PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST O5, 2003 Robext Holmes, 21639 Appaloosa CT, Canyon Lake, CA also expxessed his concerns with the ~ading that is cuxxendy taking place. He stated that the~ also issues cvith the home oamexs in the axea not being pxopexly notify of the pxoject. Jonnie Rice, 21753 Appaloosa CT, Canyon Lake, CA stated that hex lot is adjacent to one of the lots that axe cuxxendy undex development. She stated that the burm is cureendy 25 to 30 feet high. She also indicated that the asea is cluttexed with teash, and is concemed that the trash will clogged up the ~ains, and cause flooding. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY NASH AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Tentative Parcel Map No 30985 Maxkham Development Management Gtoup, Inc Coimnissionex LaPexe opened the Public Hearing at 6:15 pm, and xequested the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that the item before the Commission is a TPM, and xequested Planning and Code Enfoicement Managex Villa to xeview it with the Coiiunission. Planning and Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa stated that the applicant is xequesting to subdivide 5 acxes of vacant land into 3 commexcial paxcels. He stated that the pxoject is located along Camino Del Noxte appro~mately '/a mile north of the intexsecrion of Main Stxeet and Camino Del Norte. He indicated that the paxcel map has been deemed to be consistent with the G2 Zoning and the Genexal Commexcial designarion of the Genexal Plan. He indicated that the G2 Zoning xequ~es all newly subdivided paxcels to be a minim~ size of 20,000 squaxe feet, and that this pxoject complies with this xequixement. Planning and Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa indicated that Staff xecommends appxoval of this pxoject based on the Findings, Exhibits and is subjected to the Condirions of Appxoval. He indicated that the applicant is pxesent fox any questions that the Cominission may have. Couunissionex LaPexe requested that the applicant appxoach the podium. Larty Mazkham, 41635 Enterp~se C~cle, Temecula, CA stated that he a~ees with the Condirions of Appxoval, and would be happy to answex any questions that the Cominission may have. Commissionex LaPexe asked if anyone else wished to speak fox ox against the pxoject. Thexe being no fixxthei xequests to speak, discussion was bxought back to the Cominission fox comments. PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST O5, 2003 Commissionex Uhlry asked Staff if the infill pxoject is based on the net ox gxoss. Planning and Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa indicated that it is based on the net. Commissionex Uhhy asked fox claxificarion on Condition No. 24 whexe it discusses a 24 ft strip of land along the frontage of Camino Del Noxte. Planning and Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa indicated that it varies from 24 to 56 feet. Cominissioner Uhhy asked how much frontage dedicarion. Planning and Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa stated that it should be 1 to 2 feet. Corrunissionex Uhhy suggested xevising Condirion No. 24. He had no furthex comments. Coxiurussionex Nash had no comments. Conunissionex LaPexe had no cominents. Thexe being no fi~thex comments, Coimnissionex LaPexe closed the Public Hearing at 6:25 pm and sequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-58, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAI' NO. 30985. 3. Suvnlement Envitonmental Imuact Reuort and Tentative Tract Man 30846 Coisunission LaPexe xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt, and opened the Public Heaxing at 6:25 pm. Community Development D~ectox Bxady stated that the pxoject befare the Planning Cominission is fox the EIR and Tentative Txact Map No. 30846 and iequested that Associate Plannex Miller xeview it with the Coimnission. Associate Plannex Millex stated that the applicant has xequested appxoval of a Supplemental Env~onmental Impact Repoxt to the East Lake Specific Plan Envixonmental Impact Repoxt, and is xequesting to subdivide 75.2 acxes of vacant land into 225 single-family xesidenrial lots and 5 lettexed lots. She indicated that the avexage lot size would be 6,249 square feet. She stated that the applicant would also construct a lasge ~ainage channel. Associate Plannex Millex stated that she has xeceived quesrions from a neighboring pxopexty ownex cvith some concems. She stated that the concexns axe the locarion of the Willaxd Fault, stortn watex PAGE 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST O5, 2003 nui off, avocarion easements, flood conteol channel, the Skylaxk Drive extension. She stated that the applicant and the supplemental EIR have xesolved all but two issues. Associate Plannex Millex indicated that Staff Tecommends appxoval of this pxoject, based on the Findings, E~chibits, and is subjected to the Condirions of AppTOVal. She indicated that the applicant is pxesent to answex any questions that the Cotxunission may have. Associate Plannex Miller indicated that the applicant has indicated sevexal changes to the Conditions of Appxoval. She also suggested adding Condirion No. 96 that discusses the intexsecrion at Palomax and Skylazk to be convexted to a knuckle. Conuivssionex LaPexe xequested the applicants to appxoach the podium. Bob Fallon with KB Homes. Maxk Tolley, Uxban Pacific Buildexs. Mx. Fallon thanked Staff and indicated that a few Conditions of Approval needed to be looked at. He indicated that Condirion No. 41 would need to be modified. Mx. Tolley wanted claxificarion on Condirion No. 46 whexe it discusses paxks. Dave Sapp, Community Services Dixectox, City of Lake Elsinoxe indicated that the applicant is to pxovide a bond fox the amount equal to what they would have paid in paxk fees. He stated that they would dedicate the land to the City. IV~. Tolley indicated that Condition No. 46 could be eliminated CoiTUxussionex Uhlry concuxxed Commissionex LaPexe asked if theix wexe any fuxthex comments on the Conditions. Thexe being no fuxthex comments, Conuzussionex LaPexe xequested comments from the public. Bob Magee, 32400 Beechwood Lane in Lake Elsinoxe stated that he is in favox of the pxoject, pxovide that cextain changes axe implemented as paxt of this map's appxoval. He indicated that on the Planning Coimnission Meeting of Ap~l 1, he expxessed concems with foux axeas of the pxoject. Mx. Magee indicated that the propexty should be bxought into compliance with the City's Nuisance oxdinance, and that the lots sizes on Skylaxk be enlaxged so that they axe consistent with those in the e~cisting development. He also xequested that active and impxoved paxk faciliries axe xequixed. Lasdy, he xequested that Police and Fixe access be xeviewed pastially when it comes to Skylaxk. Mx. Magee submitted his outline of his pTesentation to the Coinmission fox the xecoxd. Ann Marie Bachmayer, 32475 Suminexset Dxive, Lake Elsinoxe stated that she has concerns with the stop sign at Corydon and Palomax. She indicated that the intexsecrion at Corydon is veiy busy and has concerns with chil~en playing in the axea. She also indicated that she has concexns that a HOA would be unplemented, and she would pxefex not to see that happen. PAGE 5- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST O5, 2003 Pat Anthony, Skylaxk, Lake Elsinoxe lives on a pxivate road. She indicated that the xoad needs to be paved, and would like to have it xemain private. Cotxunissionex LaPexe asked if anyone else wished to speak xegaxding the pxoject. Hearing no fixxther comments, discussion was bxought back to the Coinmission. Cotrunissionex Nash asked Staff if theix would be an access from Union Street to Corydon. Community Development D~ectox Bxady indicated yes. Coxmiussionex Nash stated that he xecalls heaxing that the applicant has had some discussion with the local xesidents, and xequested an overoiew of what was discussed. Mask Tolley stated that Mx. Magee menrioned that a 1000-gallon fuel tank still occupies this site. Mx. Tolley indicated that they do not own this pxopexty, howevex did indicate that they are cuxxendy in escxow with this land, and once they own it, would clean up the land. He also noted that the lot sizes on the pxoject site axe the same widths that ase on Skylask Avenue. He stated that a majority of the paxk axea is undexneath the 100 yeax flood plain fox the lake. Lasdy, he indicated that they did have the chance to speak with the xesidents on Skylaxk and as indicated befoxe, is in the County's j~isdicrion. He stated that Racquet Club is no longex connecting, and a signal is pxoposed at Corydon and Palomax, to help ease the teaffic, and the~ will not be any HOA fees. Coxrunissioner Nash had no fuxthex comments. Cotrunissioner Uhlry asked why is Staff changing Condirion No. 96 fxom having a txaffic signal consttucted at the 30th cexrificate of occupancy to the 60`~' when thexe is a~eady an e~cisting txaffic issue. Maxk Tolley indicated that it would be expensive fox them to have it at the 30~' cexrificate of occupancy. Commission Uhlry stated that fox safety purposes, a teaffic signal would need to be constructed befoxe 60~' of occupancy. He indicated that children play in the axea, and he could not appxove the 60~'. City EngineeT O'Donnell suggested changing it to 40`~. The applicant suggested 45~'. CoiviTUSSionex Uhlry agxeed to have the txaffic signal installed at the 45~' of occupancy. Commissionex Uhlry had no fuxthex comments. Commissionex LaPexe wanted claxification on the cleaning up of the pxopexty. PAGE 6- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST O5, 2003 Maxk Tolley indicated that the carxent pxoperty ownex is out of state, and they would take ownexship soon. Comnussion LaPexe asked how soon. Maxk Tolley indicated as soon as the appeals expixe. Corrunissioner LaPexe concurxed with Coi7inussionex Uh1ty on Condiuon No. 96, and have the applicant construct a traffic signal at Corydon and Palomaz at the 45`~ occupancy instead of the 60~'. Corrusussionex LaPexe stated that since all othex Condirions of Appxoval have been xesolved, he has no fuxthex comments. Corrunissionex LaPere closed the Public Hearing at 735 PM and xequested the xeading of the Resolutions. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-59, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE THE CERTIFICATION OF SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SEIR) TO THE EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 3084G. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-60, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF T.AKF ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE THE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 30848. Coxnnussionex LaPexe xequested a five-minute recess at 7:35 pm. The Planning Coinmission xeconvened the meeting at 7:45 pm. 4. Tentative Condominium Plan. Desi,~n Review No. I 2003-03 and Variance Review No. 2003-03 for "Blue Lake II Condominium Business Park" Commissionex LaPexe opened the Public Hearing at 7:45 pm, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development D'uectox Bxady indicated that this is a xequest fox a Tentarive Condominium Plan, Design Review, and Variance fox Blue Lake Condoininiutn Business P~k, and xequested Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz to xeview it with the Coxxunission. Associate Planner Pxeisendanz indicated that the applicant is xequesting thxee sepasate applications. He indicated that the 6.01-acxe site is located 400 feet noxth of the centerline of Corydon Road and PAGE 7- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST O5, 2003 Cexeal Road, outside the Liberty Specific Plan 1~ea. He stated that the fixst applicarion is to establish the proposed industrial business paxk as a"condominium industxial business paxk." He indicated that the second application is fox the Design Review. He indicated that the applicant is pxoposing to develop six pxe-cast concxete buildings totaling 10Q019 squaxe feet. He stated that thexe would be two access driveways located at each end of the pxopexty along Corydon Stxeet. He indicated that two addirional xecipxocal access points have also been provided along the south edge of the pxopexty. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated that the applicant is also xequesting a vatiance. He stated that the applicant is xequesting a xeducrion in the length of the loading space fox buildings from 40 feet length to 20 feet. He stated that the width pxovided fox these would xemain in compliance with the LEMC. He stated that the applicant is xequesting xelief fxom the LEMC xequixement that discusses a pxotective landscape buffex of five feet wide. He indicated that the applicant has a~eed instead to pxovide additional landscape matexial in strategic plantex axeas, which would scxeen the loading axeas fxom public view. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated that Staff suppoxts and xecommends to the Planning Coxrunission to appxove and adopt a Resolution, xecommending to the City CouncIl to appxove the Tentarive Condominium Plan, Design Review of the I 2003-03 and the Variance Review 2003-03, based on the Findings, E~ibits, and the pxoposed Condirions of Appxoval. Commissionex LaPexe requested comments from the Public. Alan Young, Alesco Development, 21021 Ventuxa Blvd, Woodland Hills stated that he would like to have Condirion No. 49 deleted, as he indicated that they have had the identical Condition on the parcel that is iinmediately adjacent to tlus one. He indicated that thexe is no jurisdicrion on the adjacent paxcel, ox in this paxcel. He stated that Condition No. 65 should also be deleted, as they axe not constructing any block walls. He also indicated that Condirion No. 5 it discusses CC&R's. He stated that they would annex tlvs paxcel into the other paxcel as a second phase, and the CC&R's axe akeady completed, and xeviewed by the City. Lasdy, he indicated that the axchitectuxal enhancements would be tied in with the suxxounding buildings, yet not identical. Thexe being no fuxthex comments fsom the Public, discussion was bxought back to the Cominission. Couzmissionex Nash concuxxed with the deletion of Condirions 65 and 49. He asked the applicant if on his priox pxoject if a variance was ever xequested. Mx. Young indicated "no." He stated that some of the codes wexe diffexent. He indicated that thexe is a substantial amount of loading axeas. Cominissionex Nash stated that he could undexstand why the applicant is xequesting a variance, due to the loading and unloading spaces. He stated that because the applicant is selling these individually, each ownex needs to know what the limitarions axe. He suggested amending Condirion No. 5 to addxess these loading axeas. He had no fiirdzex comments. Conunissionex Uhhy concuxxed with Commissionex Nash. He had no fuxthex comments PAGE 8- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST O5, 2003 Commissionex LaPexe also concurred cvith Commissionex Nash and had no f~thex comments. Thexe being no fuxthex comments from the Commission, Coxmivssiones LaPexe closed the Public Heaxing at 8:15 pm, and xequested the xeading of the Resolutions. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-61, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM PLAN FOR THE INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. 2003-03, TO BE LOCATED ON CORYDON STREET - APN 370-050-012 AND 370-050-002 TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-62, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF T.AKR ELSINORE APPROVAL OF DESIGN REVIEW FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. I 2003-03, TO BE LOCATED N CORYDON STREET, APN 370-050-012 AND 370- 050-002 TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-G3, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE REVIEW NO. V 2003-03 FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. I 2003-03, TO BE LOCATED ON CORYDON STREET, APN 370-050- 012, AND 370-050-002. BUSINESS ITEMS 5. Minor Design Review of a Single Family Residential Project located at 31707 Canyon Rid~e Dtive APN 363-272-006. Commissionex LaPexe indicated that this is a Business Item, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that the item befoxe the Coimnission is a Minox Design Review of a Single Fatnily Resident located at 31707 Canyon Ridge Drive, and xequested Community Development Technician Hennings xeview it with the Coininission. Community Development Technician Hennings stated that the applicant is Tequesting appxoval of a 3,428 squaxe foot two-story house to be located in the Canyon Cxeek Specific Plan. She stated that the home would have a two-cax gaxage and a sepazate one-cax gaxage. She stated that the xesident would occupy appxozcitnately 47% of the 7,154 squaxe foot lot. PAGE 9- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST O5, 2003 automaric spxinkler, and that the applicant would construct a 6-foot high wooden fence on the side pxopexty lines. She stated that the thexe is an e~sting wxought ixon fence on the xeax of the pxoperty. Community Development Technician Hennings indicated that the pxoposed pxoject is utilizing Spanish style axchitectuxe with an asched entryway and axched windows. She stated that the home would be stucco with a flat tile xoo£ She indicated that the fxont y~d would be landscaped with could not make tonight's meeting. Coxmnissionex LaPexe xequested comments fxom the Coizusussion. Commissionex Uhlry stated that this pxoject is a good infill pxoject. He indicated that he has some concexns cvith the fencing. He had no fuxther comments. Commissionex Nash had no comments. Community Development Technician Hennings stated that the applicant has woxked with Staff to develop and design a pxoject that would be a benefit to the neighbothood. She indicated that Staff supports this pxoject and xecommends to the Planning Coimi7ission appxoval, based on the Findings, Exhibits and is subject to the Conditions of Appxoval. She indicated that the applicant Coxrunissionex LaPexe had no comments. Thexe being no fuxthex comments, Coimnissionex LaPexe xequested the reading of the Resolution. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-G4, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT LOCATED AT 31707 CANYON RIDGE DRIVE APN 363- 272-006. 6. Minoi Design Review of a Single Family Residential Ptoject located at 701 Mill Street, APN 373-114-026 and 373-114-034. Commissionex LaPexe indicated that tlus is a Business Item, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that this item is a Minox Design Review of a single- family xesidence to be located at 701 Mill Stxeet, and xequested Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz to xeview it with the Couiuiission. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated that the applicant is pxoposing to develop a vacant 12,500 squaxe foot vacant lot with a 1,920 squase foot one-story manufactuxed home, with a 1,320 squaxe foot split-level detached gaxage/woxkshop. He stated that the axchitectuxal design of the pxoposed xesidence is CTaftsman style. He stated that the fxont poxch pxoposes the use of heavy 20 inches PAGE 10 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST O5, 2003 squaxe decoxarive poxch columns and a 36-inch high decoxadve beam out lookexs, typically found in Cxaftsman style homes. He indicated that the applicant would pxovide fxont yaxd landscaping with an automaric sprinl~lex system. He stated that the fencing would be a 6-foot high decoxarive vinyl fence with incoipoxate latrice panel on the top one-thixd cvith standazd vextical siding on the xeunnig poxrions of the fence. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated that Staff xecommends appxoval of this pxoject to the Planning Commission based on the Findings, E~chibits, and is subject to the Condirions of Appxoval. He indicated that the applicant is pxesent to answex any quesrions that the Conuiussion may have. Commissionex LaPexe xequested the applicant to appxoach the podium. William Caldwell, 32000 Rivexside Drive, Lake Elsinoxe, CA stated that he agxees to all of the Condirions of Appxoval with the exceprion to Condition No. 12, which discusses sewex lines. He indicated that his home would not be on sewex lines. Commissionex Uhlry noted that Condirion No. 30 would also need to be amended. Coininissionex Uhiry had no f~thex comments. Commissionex Nash conc~xed with Coimnissionex Uhlry on the changes to the Condirions of Appxoval. He indicated that the fencing is considexed an upgxade to wooden fencing. Corcunissionex LaPexe asked if the fencing mate~al was the same fencing material that the Planning Depaxtment bxought in samples of eaxliex this yeax. Planning & Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa indicated "yes." Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz indicated that he has a bxochuxe that showed pictures of the fence if the Planning Coimnission wished to see it. Coxsunission LaPexe indicated that it was not necessary. Commissionex LaPexe had no fi~thex comments, and xequested the xeading of the Resolurion. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-65, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT LOCATED AT 701 MILL STREET, APN 373-114-034 AND 373-114-026 WITH MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS NONE PAGE 11 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST O5, 2003 STAFF COMMENTS Community Development Dixectox Bxadv commented on the followin~ • None PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Commissioner LaPexe commented on the followin : • Conunissionex LaPexe stated that he xeviewed an axticle in the newspapex fxom a potenrial candidate who is mnning fox City Council, xegaxding City Staff, and wanted to have the chance to xespond to the axticle. He stated that he felt that the pexson was speaking without knowledge of Staff, without considexarion, undexstanding, and appxeciated Councilwoman Kelley xesponded on that pasriculax asticle. He indicated that he feels that the City's Staff does a great job, and appxeciates all the haxd woxk. Commissioner Uhlry commented on the following • He xequested the status of the Washington Muhxal Bank. Planning & Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa indicated that the pxoject is going well. Cwsendy, he stated that the gxading continues, and soon the applicant would be able to obtain the building perxnits. Commissionex Nash commented on the followin : • No Comments. ADjOURNMENT MOVED BY NASH SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 8:30 PM. ~ ~. ~ RON COMMISSION PAGE 12 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST O5, 2003 Respectfully Submitted, ~~~ ~. o~~ Dana C. Poxche' Community De~elopment Clexk ATTEST: ~ obext A. Bxady, Secxe to the Planning Cotmnissio MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET T.AKF. ELSINORE, CA 92530 TiTESDAY, AUGUST 19. 2003 Cha~tnan Baxnes called the Regular Planning Coimnission Meeting of August 25, 2003 to oxdex at 6:00 PM. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chaittnan Basnes. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, MATTHIES, NASH, LAPERE & UHLRY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Also present wete: Community Development Dixectox Bxady, Planning & Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa, Associate Plannex Millex, Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz, City Engineei O'Donnell, Community Development Technician Hennings, Office Specialist Poxche' and Deputy City Attorney Miles. PUBLIC COMMENTS None CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY LAPERE SECONDED BY NASH AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. Minutes a. Plannuig Couimission Regulax Meeting - July 15, 2003 b. Plamzing Couusussion Regulax Meeting - August O5, 2003. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Conditional Use Pecmit No. 2003-05, Design Review of Industrial Pxoject No. I 2002- 04, and Mitigated negative Declaration No. 2003-02 -APN 377-120-007 & 008 Cha~man Baxnes opened the Public Heating at 6:05 PM. PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 19, 2003 Community Development D~ectox Bxady indicated that this is a xequest fox a Condirional Use Pemiit, Mirigated Negative Declaxarion, and Design Review Industsial Pxoject No. 2002-04. He asked Associate Plannex Millex to xeview the xequest with the Coimnission. Associate Plannex Millex indicated that the pxoject is located on Pasadena and Centxal. She stated that the applicant is pxoposing to develop a Planned Unit and sell individual paxcels. She stated that the pxoject consists of 20 acxes, however only 13 Development acxes are pxoposed at this time. She indicated that 21 buildings axe pxoposed fox this site, totaling the building axea fox all builclings at 183,694 squaxe feet. She stated that the building xange in size from 4,658 squaze feet to 38,964 squaxe feet. She stated that appxoxirnately 15% of the site would be landscaped. Associate Plannez Millex indicated that the ~chitectuxal design that the applicant pxoposes to use is contempoxaxy industrial style. She stated that all of the paxking xequixements wexe met and exceeded. She indicated that Staff xecommends the Planning Coinnaission appxove and adopt a Resolurion based on the Findings, Exhibits and subject to the Condirions of Appxoval. She indicated that the applicant has some issues with the Condirions of Appxoval. She stated that the applicant is pxesent t6is evening to answex any questions that the Commission may have. She indicted she agteed to xemove a sentence in Condirion No. 20 that discusses design impxovements. Condition No. 21 she indicated would also be modified. She stated that the applicant is pxesent to answex any quesrions that the Coxmnission may have. Chauman Barnes asked if anyone wished to speak fox ox against the pxoject. Commissionex LaPexe asked Staff wl~ich Conditions would be xelated to Engineering. Associate Plannex Millex stated that it would be Conditions No. 30, 39, and 43. Gary Washbuxn, 905 W. Lakeshoie Drive, Lake Elsinoxe indicated that he has concems with Condirions No. 30, 38, 39, 43 and 54 and would like to discuss it with the Commission. Commissionex Uhiry asked about the dxainage on Pasadena Street. Mx. Washbuxn indicated that he spoke with the pxopexty ownex across the street, which is Neax-CaL He stated that Neaz-Cal's Engineex stated that Neax-Cal has intenrion of doing some xedesigning of the~ woxk wl~ich would help with the dxainage issue. Com~nissionex Uhhy asked Mx. Washb~n if he were going to bond a poxrion of Central. IV~. Washbum stated, "We could." Commissioner Uhlxy had no fi~thex comments. Vice Chauwoman Matthies asked claxification xegaxding Condirion No. 54 whexe it discusses floodplain elevation. PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 19, 2003 City Engineex O'Donnell stated that Condirion No. 54 and 55 axe designed to help the applicant lowex the cost of insuxance when applying fox flood insuxance. Vice Chaiiwoman Matthies asked fox clarification on Condirion No. 38, whexe it discusses paving the ent~e width of Centxal Avenue. She asked if it would be acceptable to have the applicant pave only to the centerline. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that if the applicant only paved to the centex it would leave a lip. Comxnissionex Uh1ry stated that the applicant would only need to cap the stxeet, as it a~eady has cuxbs and guttexs. He stated that gtading would not be necessuy. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies wanted to make s~e that all the needs of the applicant have been met. She xequested that Mx. Washbi~n appTOach the podium. Mx. Washbuxn appxoached the podiuxn. He introduced Conxad Riegex, Axchitect fox the pxoject. He also stated that he undexstood the Condirion and undexstood that othex pxojects have come and gone, howevex he just wanted to make s~e that he is not stuck with othex costs. He stated that he paid fox theix shase, it is in a fund, and agteed to do that street. NIr. Contad Rieger stated that the current cuxb and guttex would have to be xemoved because it is not is the coxxect location. Mx. Washbuxn indicated that he did not feel that Condition No. 55 is necessary, as the asea is one foot above the base level of the FEMA maps. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that the woxding could be changed on Condition No. 55 to xead "only if nece,rtar~'. Vice Chaiiwoman Matthies had no fuxthex comments. Coxxunissionex LaPexe asked fox clarificarion on Condition No. 21. Associate Plannex Millex stated that the second to the last sentence would be modified to xead, tbe develoj~er rhall rzsbmit evidence of compliance vrith thia requirement to, and receive ajiproval of pmof of dirclo.rure prior to making any .rucb rale. Commissionex LaPexe asked if Condirion No. 38 could be changed to xead ` feather to the center line ". Vice Chavwoman Matthies concurred. Deputy City Attorney Miles suggested to have the Condirion xemain as is, and pxesented it to the City Council. PAGE 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 19, 2003 Commissionex LaPexe had no fi~thex comments. Cominissionex Nash conc~xed with the othex Cominissionexs, and had no fuxthex comments. Chairman Baxnes asked Mx. Washbum who is the ownex. Mx. Washburn stated that the ownex is Mx. Gexald Bames. Chaimzan Baxnes wanted to have it put into the xecoxd that he is not xelated, nox has any affiliation to Mx. Gexald Barnes. Chairman Barnes asked Mx. Washb~n if he is satisfied with Condirion No. 38 l~. Washb~n stated he is not sarisfied with Condirion No. 38; howevex feels that it could be woxked out, as the TPM would be coming befoxe the Coimiiission in a few weeks. Mx. Washbum asked if Condition No. 55 had been modified. Chairwan Baxnes stated "yes." Thexe being no fi~thex comments, Chauman Baxnes closed the Public Hearing at 6:45 PM and xequested the reading of the Resolutions. MOVED BY MATTHIES, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-6G, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COiTNCIL ADOPTION OF THE MND 2003-02 FOR CUP NO. 2003-05, DESIGN REVIEW FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. I 2002-04, WHICH ENTAIL THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING WITHIN APN 377-]20-007 & 008 TO INCLUDE THE NOTED MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-G7, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-05 FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. I 2002-04, TO BE LOCATED AT CENTRAI. AVENUE AND PASADENA STREET - APN 377-120-007 & 008 TO INCLUDE THE NOTED MODIFICATION TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. PAGE 5- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 19, 2003 MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-68, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. 2002-04 TO BE LOCATED ON CENTRAL AVENUE AND PASADENA STREET - APN 377-120-007 & 008 TO INCLUDE TO NOTED MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. 3. Chairman Bames opened the Public Heaxing at 6:50 PM. Community Development Dixector Bxady indicated that this is a xequest fox appxoval of a gas starion, iniui-maxt, and automated canvash, and xequested Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz to xeview it with the Cointnission. Associate Plannex Preisendanz indicated that the gas station, miui-maxt, and automated carwash would be located on the southwest cornex of Suuuziexhill Diive and Canyon Estates Drive, east of Intexstate 15 and the San Jacinto Rivex. He indicated that the gas starion would be exclusively a self-serve opexarion and would consist of a six fueling island located undex a detached canopy. He stated the muu-mazt would be located within a detached building would pxovide goods typically found in a gxocery stoxe. He stated that no alcohol bevexages would be sold at this location. He stated the houxs of opexation would be ftom Monday thru Friday fxom 5:00 AM to 10:00 PM and Satuxday and Sunday and Holidays fxom 5:00 AM to 11:00 PM. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated that the axchitectuxal design of the pxoposed stnxctuxes is consistent with the axchitecture appmved fox the Washington Mutual Bank to the west and would complement the azchitectuxal design of the e~sting buildings in the asea. He stated that the applicant has met the intent of Section 030 of the "G1/SP" Zoning District of the Canyon Cxeek "Suwmexhill" Specific Plan. He stated that the applicant has designed the site by placing the caz wash building appxo~citnately thxee huncked sisty feet away from any xesidenrial pxopexries in the axea. He indicated that in oxdex to xeduce the impact of light glaxe genexated by the pxoject the applicant would pxovide xecessed undex canopy light fi~ctures fox the gasoline dispensing axea and fiilly shielded lamps fox the paxking lot light standaxds. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated that Staff xecommends appxoval of this pxoject based on the Findings, Exhibits and subject to the Condirions of Appxoval. He indicated that the applicant is ptesent this evening to answex any quesrions that the Coixuzussion may have. Chaixman Baxnes requested comments fxom the Public. Mx. Bill Kipp, 361-C Railxoad Canyon Road, Lake Elsinoxe mdicated that he is the Pxesident of Abbacy Coipoxarion. He indicated that would be able to answex any quesrions that the PAGE 6- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 19, 2003 Coininission may have. He stated that the numbex one mission is to have evexything blend in well. He stated that thexe would be an adult supexvising the gas starion at all times of opexation. Mx. Mike Bike, Axchitect fox the pxoject stated that he had no comments at this time. Chaiiman Basnes asked if anyone else wished to speak concexning the pxoject. Hearing no fuxthex comments, discussion was bxought back to the Conuiussion far comments. Corrunissioner Nash asked the applicant if they have developed a sign yet. Ms. Bike indicated "Yes." Associate Plannex Millex indicated that they have submitted a sign pxo~am; howevex, it was not included in the sign pxo~am yet. Commissionex Nash indicated that he likes the design, and had no fuxthex comments. Commissionex LaPexe asked if thexe is a Condirion of Appxoval that ad~esses the no sale of alcohol. Mx. Kipp indicated that thexe would be no alcohol sold what so evex. Comiuissionex LaPexe indicated that he is concexned with traffic on Suminexhill. Community Development D~ectox Bxady indicated that a txaffic signal would be installed at the intexsecrion of Suminexhill and Canyon Estates priox to occupancy. Mx. Kipp indicated that not only would a traffic signal be installed but also two supex hydrants fox the gas station sepaxately. Commission LaPexe had no fuxthex cotntnents. Vice Chaiiwoman Matthies stated that all of hex concerns have been addxessed and had no comments. Commission Uhlry stated that he has no comments. Chaixman Baxnes suggested changing the woxding ~om "no sale of alcoholic bevexages off- site, to on-rite." He also suggested changing the woxding on Condirion No. 7 to adckessing the noise xeducrion. Mx. Kipp agxeed to modify Condition No. 7, addxessing the noise xeduction issue. Chautnan Baxnes indicated that it is an excellent design, and had fuxdzex comments. PAGE 7- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 19, 2003 Thexe being no fuxthex comments, Chauman Baxnes closed the Public Hearing at 7:20 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Resolurion. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-69, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-04 TO BE LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CANYON ESTATES DRIVE AND SUMMERHILL DRIVE, PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF PM 30832, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 363-550-015 TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS ON THE NOTED CONDITIONS. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-70, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECT NO. C 2003-04, TO BE LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CANYON ESTATES DRIVE AND SUMMERHILL DRIVE, PARCEL 2 AND 3 OF PM 30832 ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 363- 550-015 TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE NOTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. 4. Vaciance No. 2003-05 and Minox Design Review for a Sign Progxam fot a proposed Commercial Centex located at Canyon Estates Diive and Summechill Drive. Chauinan Baxnes opened the Public Heaxing at 7:23 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that tl~is is a xequest fox a Sign Pxogxam fox the commexcial centes and xequested that Associate Plannex Millex xeview it with the Conunission. Associate Plannex Millex stated that this xequest is fox a pxoject located on Canyon Estates Drive and Sutntnexhill Drive. She indicated that this pxoject is paxt of the Canyon Cxeek/Suixunexhill Specific Plan and was originally zoned neighboxhood commexcial and multi-family. She stated that the applicant is xequesting a Variance to exceed the allowable signage axea and height limitarion fox a freestanding Fxeeway Identification Sign. She stated that the applicant is pxoposing a sign that would be 72 feet 6 inches in height. She noted that the ma~num height allowed fox a Fxeeway Identification Sign is 45 feet. She stated that Staff feels that a xequest fox a vaxiance fox a freeway sign that substanrially exceeds the allowable sign axea by 694% is unxeasonable far this commexcial centex. She indicated that the applicant is xequesting appxoval of a"rollex blind" system fox changing the pricing fox the Shell poxtion of the Fxeeway Sign. She indicated that the applicant states that this system would only change nutnbexs when gas pxices change and would not be continually moving. PAGE 8- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 19, 2003 Associate Plannex Millex indicated that this pxogxam is considexed incomplete. She stated that sevexal items have been xequested by Staff and have not been xeceived. Thexefoxe, she indicated Staff could not xecommend appmval of the Sign Pro~am. Chaittnan Barnes xequested comments fxom the Public. Thomas Saltaxelli-Vice Pxesident of Abbacy Holding 361-C Railxoad Canyon Road, Lake Elsinoxe, stated that the puxpose fox the laxge sign is to draw in customexs into the centex. He indicated that the centex would have nine businesses and would like to have each business listed on the sign. Tun Pitts - Censoi~ce Anaheim, CA indicated that he xepxesents the applicant He indicated that he has met with Staff last yeax, on six diffexent occasions. He indicated that thexe was not an aschitect at that point, and Staff indicated that they did not want a generic sign. He stated that the purpose fox the "xoller blind" is to show pricing fox the fuel fxom the I-15 Fxeeway. He indicated that the coloxs and designs axe consistent to suriounding building. Lasdy, he indicated that the Sign Pxogxam is expandable and would be able to answex any quesrions that the Coinuiission may have. Chaixman Barnes xequested comments from the Public. Thexe being no fuxther comments, discussion was bxought back to the Coimzussion fox comments. Commissionex Uhlxy stated that he doesn't have a pxoblem so much cvith the height, but xathex the squaxe footage. He indicated that he would like to see it come down. He stated that it is not necessaiy fox the sign to list the gas prices. He indicated that thexe is too much to xead on the sign, and is concexned that an accident could occ~, should a dxivex on the Fxeeway would be spending too much time xeading the sign, and not paying attention to the xoad. He had no fuxthex comments. Commissionex LaPexe stated that the Elsinoxe Oudet Centex has ovex 100 tenants. He stated that this sign is ovexkill. He suggested using a sign sixnilax to the "Foxd" sign. He indicated that the sign is too big fox the axea and would not support appxoval. He had no fuxthex comments. Coimnissionex Nash concuxxed with the other Coimsussionexs. He stated that he likes the idea of the xotating sign. He indicated that the sign obviously still needs woxk and xecommended that the Sign Pxogxam be bxought back to the Commission at a latex date. Mx. Pitts infortned the Conuivssion that the Washington Mutual Bank is already moving forwaxd, and xequested that the Coimirission appxove signs on the bank only. Vice Chairwoman Matthies stated that she like the idea of the xotating sign. Howevex, she indicated that she would like to see the sign xeduced. Associate Plannei Millex indicated that the Code does not allow moveable signs. She also indicated that Cal-Txans need to be paxt of the xeview and we cuxxendy do not have a Condirion fox that at tl~is point. PAGE 9- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 19, 2003 Chaixman Barnes concursed with the Commission on having the pxoject continued due to the pxoject being incomplete. He also indicated that he has tcvo sets of designs, and wanted to know which set is to be used. Community Development D~ectox Bxady suggested appxoving the Washington Mutual Bank sign on the building. He stated that the applicant has a~eed to xe-design the sign, and would need to know how long it would take the applicant to complete this. Associate Plannex Millex asked Community Development D~ector if the applicant could have the Washington Mutual Bank appxoved ovex the countex. It was agxeed by the Cominission to have the Sign Pxogram bxought back to the Coiniiussion on Septembex 16, 2003. There being no fixxthex comments, Chavtnan Barnes closed the Public Hearing at 830 P.M. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO HAVE VARIANCE NO. 2003-05 AND MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF SIGN PROGRAM FOR SUMMERHILL COMMERCIAL CENTER LOCATED AT CANYON ESTATES DRIVE CONTINUED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON SEPTEMBER 16, 2003. Chauman Baxnes xequested a five-minute xecess of the Planning Commission at 8:25 P.M. The Planning Coiinnission xeconvened the meeting at 8:30 P.M. 5. Zone Code Amendment No. 2003-02, Chapter 17.18 of the Lake Elsinoxe Municiual Code regarding density bonuses. Chauinan Barnes opened the Public Heaxing at 8:31 P.M. and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development D~ectox Bxady indicated that this is a Lequest to have the oxdinance of the City of Lake Elsinoxe adding Chaptex 17/18 of the Lake Elsinoxe Municipal Code xegaxding density bonuses tabled, and d~ect Staff to xe-notice and schedule the Public Hearing fox a fixtute date. MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO HAVE THE ZONE CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2003-02, CHAPTER 17.18 OF THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING DENSITY BONUSES TABLED FOR A FUTURE DATE. PAGE 10 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 19, 2003 BUSINESS ITEMS G. Minor Design Review of a Duplex located at 409 N. Langstaff Street. Chaiitnan Basnes indicated that this is a Business Item, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that this pxoject is a xequest fox a Minox Design Review of a Duplex and xequested Community Development Technician Hennings to xeview it with the Coimnission. Community Development Technician Henniugs stated that this item befoxe the Coimuission is a xequest to construct a mulri family xesidence located north of Pottery Street, on Langstaff, within the Axea 6 of the Historic Elsinoxe Ovexlay District. She indicated that the Duplex is located on a 9,000 squaxe foot lot. She stated that Unit 1 is 778 squaxe feet and Unit 2 is 759 squase feet, fox a total axea of 1,537 squaxe feet. She indicated that the applicant would pxovide a caxpoxt between the two units. She stated that each unit includes a kitchen, living xoom, bafl~oom and two bedxooms. Community Development Technician Hennings stated that the applicant would pxovide fxont yeax landscaping with automaric spxinklex systems. She also indicated that the applicant would constnxct a 6-foot high wooden fence on the side and xeas pxopexty lines. She indicated that a 3-foot high picket fence would be pxovided in the front yard to pxovide pxivacy. Community Development Technician Hennings stated that Staff supports this pTOject, based on the Findings, E~ibits, and is subjected to the Conditions of Appxoval. She indicated that the applicant is pxesent this evetung to answex any quesrions that the Coininission may have. Chaimian Barnes xequested comments from the Public. Thexe being no comments, discussion was brought back to the Coimnission far discussion. Commissionex Nash indicated that he likes the lay-out of this pxoject. He stated that the City would moxe than likely see moxe of these types of pxojects. He had no fi~thex comments. Couzmissionex LaPexe had no comments. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies had no comments. Commissionex Uhlry asked the applicant if thexe axe any in lieu fees. City Engineex O'Donnell indicated "yes, the applicant is xesponsible fox cuxbs and guttexs." Commissionex Uhlxy had no fuxthex comments. PAGE 11 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 19, 2003 Chaixman Barnes had no comments and xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-71, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A DUPLEX LOCATE AT 409 N. LANGSTAFF STREET INFORMATIONAL NONE STAFF COMMENTS Community Development Directox Bxady commented on the following • He indicated that the Planning Division has xeceived a tequest fox appxoval of a watexcxaft rental, located in the Ovexlay xecxearion Zone. He indicated that it should be treated as a tempoxary use pennit application, and possibly bxing back as a CUP. Coxsunissionex Nash asked whexe the watexcraft xental facility would be located. Community Development Technician Hennings indicated it would be located on Lakeshoxe Drive acxoss from Bushman. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chaixman Barnes commented on the followin¢: • No comments Vice Chauwoman Matthies commented on the followine: • No comments. Cotsunissionex Uhlry commented on the followins~ • No comments Coimnissionei Nash commented on the followine: • No comments PAGE 12 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 19, 2003 Commissionex LaPexe commented on the followin : • Thanked Staff again fox all the~ haxd woxk. ADjOURNMENT MOVED BY NASH SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 8:45 PM. HN BARNES, CHAIRMAN Respectfully Submitted a.~~,r~. C'fc0 ~ k~• Dana C. Poxche' Community Development Clexk ATTEST: GiC R ext A. Bxady, Secxetary to e Planning Coinmission MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET T.AKF: ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 Chaixman Baxnes called the Regulax Planning Coizunission Meeting of Septembex 2, 2003 to oxdex at 6:01 PM. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Coininissionex LaPere. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, MATTHIES, NASH, LAPERE & UHLRY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Also ptesent were: Community Development D~ectox Bxady, Planning & Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa, Associate Plannex Millex, Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz, City Engineex O'Donnell, Community Development Technician Hennings, Office Specialist Poxche' and Deputy City Attoxney Miles. PUBLIC COMMENTS None CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY LAPERE SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. Minutes: Planning Couunission Regulax Meeting - August 19, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Tentative Patcel Map No 31051 Corneistone Gcou~ Chaixman Bames opened the Public Hearing at 6:03 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 2, 2003 Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that this is a xequest fox a Tentative Paxcel Map located in the I,imited Indushial Distsict at Pasadena Street, Colliex Avenue, and Central Avenue, and xequested Associate Plannex Millex to xeview it with the Conunission. Associate Plannex Millex stated that befoxe she discussed the pxoject, the applicant pointed out a couple of changes to the Conditions of Appxoval. She stated that one of the changes would be to Condirion No. 19, which does not refex to this pioject and could be deleted. She stated that the next change would be to Condirion No. 20. She indicated that the applicant has xequested to delete the woxd parking"in the sentence. Associate Plannex Millex stated that tl~is pxoject would subdivide 20 acres of vacant land into 24 paxcels to be used as a futuxe industrial project. She stated that the pxoposed pxoject would xange in sizes from 12,971 to 213,831 squaze feet. She indicated that access to the buildings would be off Centeal and Pasadena Avenue. She indicated that Staff recommended appxoval of this pxoject based on the Findings, E~ibits and is subject to the Condirions of Appxoval. She stated that the applicant is ptesent this evening to answex any quesuons that the Cominission may have. Chaimian Barnes xequested comments fxom the public. Russell Sharp, xepxesenting Coxnexstone Gxoup, 1485 Spruce Sueet, Ste. H, Rivexside, CA indicated that he conc~s with the changes to the Condirions of Appxoval, and had no fiuthex comments. Thexe being no fuxthex comments from the public, discussion was bxought back to the Comxnission. Commissionex Uhhy asked the applicant if Condition No. 28 had been xesolved. Gary Washbuxn, 905 West Lakeshoxe Drive indicated that the issue with Condirion No. 28 had not yet been xesolved. He stated that he hoped that the Condition would be xesolved priox to the City Council meeting. He suggested change the language of the Condition to xead the same as in the Industrial Pxoject No. I 2002-04. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that the existing ci~b and guttex would xemain on lot 24 and the applicant would give the City the right-of-way that is xequixed. Coinmissionex Uhlry had no fuxthex comments. Vice Chauwoman Matthies had no comments. Commissionex LaPexe asked the applicant if they agxeed to Conditions No. 25 and 27. Gaiy Washbucn indicated that the Condirions wexe pex Code and would agxee to those Conditions. PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 2, 2003 Comtnissionex LaPere had no fi~thex comments. Commissionex Nash had no comments Chaixman Barnes had no comments. Thexe being no fixxthex comments, Chair.tnan Barnes closed the Public Hearing @ 6:16 PM and iequested the xeading of the Resolurion. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-72, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 31051 TO INCLUDE THE CHANGES TO THE MENTIONED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. 3. Conditional Use Permit No. 2003-03. Variance No. 2003-04. and Commetcial Project No. 2003-03 - Manufactured Homes Sales Lot. Chaixman Barnes opened the Public Heaxing at 6:17 PM and requested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that this is a xequest fox appxoval of a Manufactared Homes Sales Lot, and xequested Community Development Technician Hennings to xeview it with the Coiiuiussion. Community Development Technician Henniugs stated that the pxoject is appxoxitnately 1'/z acxes, and would featuxe five manufact~ed homes, and office building, spec xoom, and a utility/stoxage room. She stated that the applicant is xequesting a variance due to a xequest to xeduce the front setback from the avexage of 20 feet to 10 feet. She indicated that the Condirional Use Permit is fox the outdoox display of the models. She stated that the applicant has pxovided additional landscaping and walkways to cxeate a paxk-like setting. She indicated that the models axe not to be occupied at any time, but xathex fox display only. She stated that the applicant is xequesting to xotate the models every 2 to 5 yeaxs, and the appxoval pxocess to be handled as a Adininistsative Design Review with the appxoval of the Community Development Dixectox. Community Development Technician Henuings stated that Staff suppoxts the appxoval of the pxoject based on the Findings, Exhibits and is subject to the Conditions of Appxoval. She indicated that the applicant is pxesent to answex any questions that the Commission may have. Chaixxnan Baxnes xequested comments from the public. PAGE 4- PI,ANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembes 2, 2003 Mike Gxabowski, 12018 Central Avenue, Chino, CA 91710 stated that he is available to answer any quesuons that the Commission may haoe. Thexe being no fi~thex public comments, discussion was bxought to the Coinmission. Comnvssionex Nash had no comments. Comtnissionex LaPexe xequested clarificarion on the woxding "rip-rap"in Condirion No. 44. Mx. Gxabowski indicated that "rij~-rap" is a term used to the xocks along the embanl~nent of the San Jacinto Rivex to pxotect it fxom exosion. Commissionex LaPexe asked the applicant how many palm txees would be used fox the landscaping. Mx. Gxabowski stated that moxe than 120 matuxe palm trees would be pxovided. Comnvssionex LaPexe asked what type of palms would be pxovided. IVIx. Gxabowski stated that they would be using a vaxiety of diffexent palms to include Canaxy Palms, Queen Palms, and Robusta Palms. Comnussioner LaPexe asked whexe the palm trees are coming from. Mx. Gxabowski stated that they ase being unpoxted from outside of the City. Cominissionex LaPexe had no fixxthex comtnents. Vice Chav~cvoman Matthies concutxed cvith Coiuinissionex LaPexe and had no fiixthex comtnents. Commissionex Uhlry asked the applicant to clarify the variance fox the setback xeducrion Mx. Gxabowski stated that the City is requesting a 20-foot landscape buffex between the stxeet and the project. He stated that because of the layout of the models, it would be very tight and axe xequesting 10 feet total. Conunissioner Uhlry indicated that he had no fuxthex comments. Chaiunan Basnes asked the applicant if the neighboxs of the pxoject wexe in agxeement with the paxking access. Mx. Gxabowski indicated that an agxeement akeady e~cists. Cha~man Bames had no fuxthex comments. Thexe being no fuxthex comments, Chaixxnan Barnes closed the Public Hearing at 630 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Resolurion. PAGE 5- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 2, 2003 MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-73, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF T"AKF. ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-03 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A MANIJFACTURED HOME SALES LOT LOCATED AT 31631 AUTO CENTER DRIVE. MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-74, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 2003-04 FOR THE REDUCTION OF FRONT SETBACK, REQUIREMENTS FOR A COMMERCIAL PROJECT LOCATED AT 31G31 AUTO CENTER DRIVE. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-75, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF COMMERCIAL PROJECT COMMERCIAL NO. 2003-03 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF MANUFACTURED HOMES SALES LOT LOCATED AT 31631 AUTO CENTER DRIVE. 4. Conditional Use Pecmit No. 2003-06 - Outside Stora,ge vacd at 18625 Dexter Avenue. Chaixman Bames opened the Public Heaxing at 6:31 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development D~ectar Brady indicated that this is a xequest fox an outdoox stoxage yaxd and xequested Community Development Technician Hennings to xeview it cvith the Coinmission. Community Development Technician Hennings stated that tlus pxoject is located at Dextex Avenue at the cornex of 3`d Street, on a 20,900 squaxe foot lot. She stated that the applicant is using the stoxage yaxd fox construction landscaping and exosion contxol pxoducts. She stated that the applicant would also pxovide a 600 squase foot tempoxaxy office on the pxopexty to use as a construcrion office. She indicated that the applicant would pxovide a paxking lot that would be paved and striped fox nine spaces, including one handicap paxking space. Community Development Technician Hemiuigs stated that Staff supports the pxoject and xecommends appxoval based on the Findings, E~chibits, and subject to the Conditions of Appxoval. She indicated that the applicant is not pxesent this evening. Chaixman Bames xequested comments from the Public. Thexe being no comments fxom the public, discussion was bxought back to the Couunission fox comments. PAGE 6- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 2, 2003 Commissionex Uhliy suggested modifying Condirion No. 11 to include language about the scxeening from public view. Community Development Technician Hennings indicated that Condirion No. 11 could be modified to add ".rubject to the approval af tbe Community Develoj~ment Director. " Coinuiissionex Uhlty had no futthex comments. Coimnissionex Nash concuxxed with Coinuzissionex Uhhy's xecommendarions of modifying Condirion No. 11. He had no fuxthex comments. Vice Chauwoman Matthies had no comments. Chairman Barnes asked if the applicant is going to pxovide poxtable xestxooms ox septic tanks. Community Development Technician Hennings stated that it is currendy on a sepric tank. Chairman Barnes had no f~thex comments. Thexe being no f~thex comments, Chainnan Barnes closed the Public Heaxing and xequested fox the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY MATTHIES, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-76, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-OG FOR AN OUTSIDE STORAGE YARD AT 18625 DEXTER AVENUE TO INCLUDE MODIFICATIONS TO CONDITION NO. 11. BUSINESS ITEMS 5. Minot Design Review of a Single Family Residence located at 1G503 Stevens Avenue. Chaiunan Barnes indicated that next item is a Business Item, and due to a conflict of intexested he excused himself from this poxtion of the meeting at 6:50 PM . Vice Chauwoman Matthies xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development D'uectox Bxady stated that this pxoject is a xequest fox a Minox Design Review of a Single Family home, and xequested Associate Plannex Rolfe Pxeisendan~ to xeview it with the Cominission. Associate Planner Pxeisendanz indicated that this home is located 600 feet east of the centexline of Dryden Steeet on the south side of Stevens Avenue. He stated that the PAGE 7- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - September 2, 2003 applicant is pxoposing to develop a vacant 8,800 squaze foot lot with a 2,473 squaxe foot two-stoiy home and a 652 squaze foot attached gaxage. He stated that the axchitectuzal design would be a"Spanish Colonial" design. He indicated that the applicant would pxovide front yaxd landscaping to include two 15-gallon street trees and one 15-gallon accent tree. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated that this pxoject meets all of the xequ~ements of the Lake Elsinoxe Municipal Code, and Staff xecommends appxoval based on the Findings, E~chibits and is subject to the Conditions of Appxoval. Vice Chauwoman Mattlves asked that the applicant appxoach the podium. Jerry Whitcomb, xepxesentarive fox the applicant, indicated that he would be available to answex any questions, if necessaiy. Thexe being no comments from the public, discussion was bxought back to the Couuirission. Conunissionex Nash asked the applicant if the xesidence would have septic oi sewer? Mx. Whitcomb indicated that septic tanks would be pxovided. Coxrunissionex Nash asked the applicant if a pexk test had been completed. Mx. Whitcomb indicated "yes." Coinmissionex Nash had no fiuthex comments. Commissionex LaPexe had no comments. Coinmissionex Uhlxy asked Staff to clarify Condition No. 9. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz indicated that Condirion No. 9 should not have been added, and he would delete it. Conunissionex Uhlry had no fuxthex comments. Vice Chauwoman Matthies stated that she likes the looks of the pxoject, and had no comments to add. Thexe being no fiuthex comments fxom the Coimnission, Vice Chauwoman Mattlves xequested the xeading of the Resolurion. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-77, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF T•AKF: ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 16503 STEVENS AVENUE, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 378-223-085 PAGE 8- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 2, 2003 Chauinan Baxnes xeconvened to the meeting at 6:57 PM. INFORMATIONAL NONE STAFF COMMENTS Community Development D~ector Bxady commented on the following • No comments PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chaixman Bames commented on the followine: He asked fox the status of the pipeline along Gxape Street. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated no starixs to date. Vice Chau~cvoman Matthies commented on the followin¢: • She advised Community De~elopment D~ectox Bxady that Kellogg Street has potholes, and suggested for them to be xepaiYed. Comnvssionex Uhlry commented on the following • No comments. Commissionet Nash commented on the following: He asked about the Torn Ranch pxoject, and asked if the plan included blocking off stteets along Washington and Dijon. Community Development D~ectox Bxady indicated that paxt of the development would included to have Washington a Cul-de-sac and then at Dijon would have xestxicted access to help control the tsaffic and the speed on Washington. Coimnissionex Nash had no fuxthex comments. Commissionex LaPexe coxnmented on the followine: • No comments. PAGE 9- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 2, 2003 ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY NASH SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 7:00 PM. BARNES, CHAIRMAN Respectfiilly Subxnitted ~eLua, C' . ~~ Dana C. Poxche' Community Development Clexk ATTEST: ~obext A. Bxady, Secxeta~ to the Planning Co~unission MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TLTESDAY, SEPTEMBER 1G, 2003 Chaixman Barnes called the Regulax Planning Coimnission Meeting of Septembex 2, 2003 to oidex at 6:09 PM. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Coxsunissionex Uhhy. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, MATTHIES, NASH, LAPERE & UHLRY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Also pxesent wete: Community Development D~ectox Bxady, Planning & Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa, Associate Plannex Millex, Associate PlanneT Pxeisendanz, City Engineex O'Donnell, Community Development Technician Heiuiuigs, Office Specialist Poxche' and Deputy City Attoxney Miles. PUBLIC COMMENTS None CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY LAPERE SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. Minutes: Planning Coimnission Regulax Meeting - Septembex 2, 2003 PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 16, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Tentative Condominium Map No 31531. Residential Design Review No. R 2003-08 and Conditional Use Pernut No. 2003-07 for the Lake Elsinore Cirv Centex Townhomes. ~~ Chairman Barnes opened the Public Heaxing at 6:10 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Comxnunity Development D~ectox Bxady indicated that this was a xequest fox a Tentarive Condoininiuxn Map, a Residenrial Design Review, and a CiJP fox the Lake Elsinoxe City Centex Townhomes, and xequested Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz to xeview it with the Coxmnission. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz indicated that the applicant requested appxoval fox the Tentarive Condoininium Map, the Design Review considexarion fox the construcrion of fouxteen xesidential condominium buildings. He indicated the Conditional Use Pernvt would allow fox the establishment of 84 individually owned attached Townhomes, which would pasticipate in an undeslying common axea pursuant to the Elsinoxe City Centex Specific Plan and ChapteT 17.74 of the LEMC Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated that the pxoject is consisted of 7.98-acxes located on the east side of Gxape Steeet, and south of Railroad Canyon Road. He indicated that the applicant was pxoposing to establish a xesidenrial condoinuuum community to consist of fouxteen, two stoiy wood fxamed buildings, totaling appro~cimately 141,288 squaxe feet. He stated that each building would xange in size fxom a one-bedxoom 864 squaze foot unit to a thxee-bedxoom 1,450 squase foot unit. He indicated that each building would include also six enclosed attached gaxage-paxking spaces. Associate Planner Pxeisendanz stated that the pxojects common asea would include a swunining pool axea, a tot lot, basbecue/picnic axeas, common walls and fences, aisle-ways, pavement, minar accessory stxuctures such as monument signs, mailboxes, landscaped axeas, and onsite undexgxound and abovegxound utility infrastructuxe unpxovements necessary to seroice and suppoxt the xesidenrial community. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz indicated that the axchitectural design of the pxoject would be identified as a Santa Bazbaxa Mission style and would be consistent with the style of the buildings in the axea. Associate Planner Pxeisendanz stated that Condition No. 55 had been discussed with the City Engineex and the applicant and all have agreed on changing the vexbiage. City Engineex O'Donnell xead Condirion No. 55 to include the modifications as follows; the most southerly drivewap will be xestricted to xight turn in and right turn out movements, unler.r impravement,r on Grape Street can be done to j~ravide adeguate rite dirtant for left turrz.c out PAGE 3- PI.A.NNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 16, 2003 Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated that Staff recommended approval of this pxoject based on the Findings, Exhibits, and was subject to the Condirions of AppTOVaI. He indicated that the applicant was pxesent and would be able to answex any questions that the Coimnission had. Chairman Bames xequested comments from the public. Glen Daigle, Villa Maxtinique 28992 Old Town Fxont Sueet, Suite #297, Temecula, CA indicated that he concurxed with the change to Condirions No. 55 and agxeed to the xemauung Conditions of Appxoval. Thexe being no fuxthex comments fxom the public, discussion was bxought back to the Corninission fox comments. Coimzussion Nash stated that he likes the lay out, as it was a low density and was suitable fox the axea. He had no fuxthex comments. Conunission LaPexe concuxxed with Coimnissionet Nash. He asked the applicant how many additional bazbecues would be added. Mx. Daigle indicated that tl~ee additional basbecues would be added between buildings 1 and 2. He indicated that the change was pex Staff's xequest. Commissionex LaPexe asked if the teash enclosuxes wexe landscaped. Mx. Daigle indicated "yes." Couimissionex LaPexe had no fuxthex comments. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies stated that she has some concerns with the tot lot. She stated that exhibit "P" showed the tot lot noxth of building 11. She asked the applicant if this is coxxect. 1~. Daigle indicated that the map showed an exxox, and that the tot-lot was actually located noxth of building nutnbex 7. Vice Chauwoman Matthies asked l~. Daigle how the chil~en wexe getting to the tot lots. Mx. Daigle stated that xesidents could access the tot-lots between buildings 6 and 8. Vice Chairwoman Matthies asked Staff to clarify the locarion of the pool. She asked that accoxcling to the Staff Repoxt, the pool was located between buildings 3 and 4. She stated that the plans showed the pool located between buildings 3 and 6, and xequested clarification. Associate Plamiex Pxeisendanz indicated that the Staff Repoxt information was incoxxect, and it should xead betcveen buildings 3 and 6. PAGE 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - September 16, 2003 Vice Chaixwoman Matthies had no futthex comments. Coxnnvssionex Uhhy pointed out to Staff an errar on page 11 of 47 undex the Findings. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz concurred, and agxeed to have it changed to state along Graf~e Street. Commissionex Uhlry indicated that he has some concerns with the north entxy access. He stated that was the only entrance to the entixe complex. IV~. Daigle stated the Fue Depaztment had it limited to less that 150 feet which was pex theix code. He indicated that beyond 150 the F~e Depactment would like a tuxn-asound cul-de- sac. Coininissionex Uhlry had no fuxthex comments. Chairwan Barnes asked if they were going to be aix-spaced. Mx. Daigle stated "yes." Chauman Barnes asked if the trash enclosuxes would accommodate the City's Oxdinance fox recycle trash contauiexs. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated that it was in the Condirions of Appxoval. Chairman Barnes asked about the staixs axound the pool asea. He asked if they wexe going to have an access asea outside the gate. NIr. Daigle indicated that the plans wexe changed about one week ago to have the access inside the fence. Chairman Baxnes asked if the fencing would be completely axound the perimetex of the complex. Mr. Daigle stated that their intent was to have the entixe completed fenced. Chaixinan Baxnes had no fi~thex conunents. Thexe being no fi~thex comments, Chaiiman Barnes closed the Public Hearing at 635 PM and xequested the xeading of the Resolutions. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-78, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31531 FOR THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" TO BE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF GRAI'E STREET AND SOUTH OF THE RAILROAD CANYON ROAD/GRAI'E PAGE 5- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 16, 2003 STREET INTERSECTION, WITHIN THE ELSINORE CITY CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN AREA, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 3G3-530-010. MOVED BY MATTHIES, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-79, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-07 FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" TO BE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF GRAPE STREET AND SOUTH OF THE RAILROAD CANYON ROAD/GRAl'E STREET INTERSECTION, WITHIN THE ELSINORE CITY CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN AREA, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 3G3-530-010. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-80, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF RESIDENTIAL DESIGN NO. 2003-08 FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND ESTABLISHMENT OF THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" TO BE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF GRAPE STREET AND SOUTH OF THE RAILROAD CANYON ROAD/GRAPE STREET INTERSECTION, WITHIN THE ELSINORE CITY CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN AREA, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 363-530-010. 3. Development Agreement Bv and Between the City of Lake Elsinote and Centex Homes. Chainnan Barnes excused himself fxom this poxtion of the meeting due to a conflict of intexest. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies opened the Public Heaxing at 6:39 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Report. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that the item befoxe the Couitnission was a Development Agreement with Centex Homes fox an undeveloped noxthern poxrion of the Tuscany Hills Mastex Planned Community. He indicated that the majority of the pxopexty was cuxxendy designated fox single-family xesidenrial development and located in the Tuscany Hills Specific Plan. Community Development Dixectox Brady stated that implementation of a Development Agxeement would xeduce the economic risk associated with development of the subject pxopexty. He stated that the applicant would pay the City a Development Agteement Fee of $50,000 upon execurion of the Agxeement and pex unit of $3,500 fox the benefit of vesting the development xequ~ements. He indicated that the adjusted upwaxd 3.5% pex yeax commencing in yeax 6. In addition, he stated that the Developex shall dedicated to the City a 5-acxe minim~ paxk impxoved with 2 xegulation PAGE 6- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 16, 2003 litde league field and a f~e engine meeting the specificarions of the Rivexside County Fixe Depaxtment. He indicated that the Agxeement also xequ~es the Developer to paxricipate in the City's CFD 2003-01 fox police, fixe and paxamedic seivices and to pxovide affoxdable housing oppoittixnities in accoxdance with applicable pxovisions of the California community Redevelopment Law. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies xequested comments fxom the Public. Hearing no comments, discussion was bxought back to the Coimnission. Counnissionet LaPexe asked if it was noxmal pxoceduxe to have it commence on the 6th yeax. Community Development D~ectox Bxady stated that each D/A was unique. Conunissionex LaPere stated that six yeaxs seemed a bit long, and asked if it could be possibly 3 yeaxs. Community Development D~ectox Bxady stated that this was agxeed upon by the Developex and the City. Commissionex LaPexe had no fuxthex comments. Commissionex Uhlxy stated that he liked the incenrives, and had no fuxthex comments. Vice Chaiuwoman Matthies had no comments. Thexe being no fuithex comments, Vice Chaiiwoman Matthies closed the Public Heaxing at 6:45 PM and xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-81, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PREANNEXATION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CENTEX HOMES. Chaixtnan Barnes xeconvened the meeting at 6:46 PM. 4. Preannexation and Development Agteement By and Between the Citv of Lake Elsinore and Pacific Clay Products, Inc. Chauinan Basnes opened the Public Heaxing at 6:46 PM, and requested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Directox Bxady indicated that this was a xequest fox a Pxeannexarion and Development Agxeement concexning the pxoperty located west of Lake Stxeet and South of the I-15 and was within the City's sphexe of influence, but outside of the PAGE 7- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 16, 2003 City's texritorial jurisdicrion. He indicated that the applicant was xequesting a Pxeannexation and Development Agxeement to vest the land use designations, development standaxds and development impact fees. He stated that the vnplementarion of a Pxeannexarion and Development A~eement would xeduce the econoxnic risk associated with development of the propexty. He indicated that the applicant would pay the City a Development Agxeement Fee (DAG) of $50,000 upon execution of the Agteement. He noted that an additional $50,000 DAG fee would be due in the event the Developer did not complete the annexarion pxoceedings fox obtained land use enridements priox to the fifth annivexsaxy date of the Agxeement. Community Development Directox Bxady stated that the Developex would be zequixed to pay a pex unit DAG fee of $5,500 fox the benefit of vesting the development xequiuements. He stated that the A~eement also xequired the Developex to participate in the City's CFD 2003-1 far police, fixe, and paxamedic sexvices. He noted that the initial tertn of the pxoposed Development A~eement would be 5 yeazs with up to foi~ 5-yeax extensions that would be pxovided automarically to the Developex if and only if specific pexfoxmance cxitexia wexe sarisfied. He indicated that the applicant was pxesent tl~is evening to answex any questions that the Coiuinission may have. Vice Chaitwoman Mattlues xequested comments fsom the public. Fxans Bigelow, Casde, & Cooke, Thousand Oaks, CA stated that they wexe very intexested in puxsuing an Annexarion into the City. He stated that his company owned the pxopexty fox many yeaxs and was vexy excited to get staxted. Comtnissionex LaPexe xequested clarificarion to the texm "Pxe-Zoned." Community Development Dixectoz stated that was the typical pxocess when a pxopexty was annexed in to the City. Coxsunissionex LaPexe asked if it was being developed around Pacific Clay Pxoducts. Mx. Bigelow stated that it would be developed in phases. He stated that ultimately the pxoperty would be developed xesidenrial and commexcial. He stated that he anricipated somewhexe in the xange of five to sis thousand units cvith some commexcial as well. Coimnissionex LaPexe indicated that he was pleased to heax that they wexe intexested in anne~ng into the City, and had no fuxthex comtnents. Commissionex Nash stated that it was prudent fox Pacific Clay to entex into this agxeement at this time. He had no furthez comments. Vice Chauwoman Matthies conc~xed with Commissionex Nash and had no comments. Coininissionex Uhhy stated that he had some concexns and quesrions fox the applicant. He asked if ERM and theix lease had been bought-out ox cancelled. PAGE 8- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 16, 2003 N~. Bigelow indicated that he was not fainiliar with this ~ea of discussion. Counnissionex Uhky stated that DAG would affect them. Mx. Bigelow indicated that he did not know the answexs to that and would foicvasd the question to the pexson who handles that axea. Coxsunission Uhlry stated that this company had been in the Valley fox a very long time, and would like to see moxe of a concept ox ha~e some type of a study session befoxe he would agxee to the DAG. Cominissionex Uhlry asked the applicant what steps had been taken towaxds the habitat fot the fish and wildlife. Mx. Bigelow indicated that numexous discussions xecendy took place betcveen all paxties involved. He indicated that thexe wexe outstanding issues. Coimnissionex Uhlry stated that he xealized they wexe in some negoriarions and litigarion cvith the County of Rivexside, and would pxefex not to be a paxt of it at this time. He stated that without some type of concept of what was planned fox the axea, he was not in favox of the DAG. Thexe being no fi~thex comments fxom the Coimnission, Chautnan Bames closed the Public Heaxing at 7:10 PM and iequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY 4 TO 1 VOTE WITH COMMISSIONER UHLRY OPPOSING THE VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-82, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING OF PREANNEXATION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AND PACIFIC CLAY PRODUCTS CORPORATED. 5. Conditional Use Permit No. 2003-12 and Industrial Project No 2002-08, Norman Industries. Chaiunan Barnes opened the Public Heaximg at 7:11 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Directox Bxady stated that the item befare the Comnaission was a xequest fox a Design Review far the construcrion Condirional Use Permit foi an office waxehouse within the East Lake Specific Plan. He xequested Plannuig and Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa to xeview it with the Coimnission. PAGE 9- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - September 16, 2003 Plautiing and Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa stated that the xequest was far a pxoject within the East Lake Specific Plan, on the noxth side of Corydon Road, and west of Como Street. He indicated that the site was developed with an existing 8,990 squaxe foot wasehouse/manufactuiing/metal building sevexal gxeenhouse buildings used fox stoxage and associated d~e/paved paxking facilities. Planning and Code Enfoxcement ManageT Villa indicated that the building was appxoved by the City Council in Novembex of 1982 and 1994. He stated that since then, the East Lake Specific Plan has been appxoved and adopted by City Council thexefoxe establishing new zoning and development d~ectives fox the subject site. Planning and Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa indicated that in the past the Planning Commission and City Council has been discourage to constxuct and appxove metal buildings. Thexefoxe, he indicated that the specific sections of the Code that addxessed building constructions stated, "Sixnilaxly, metal as an enhancement material is acceptable while plain metal building is not." He stated that the topogxaphical featuxes and axe xelarively flat with one ~adually sloping axea. He stated it was within an axea that is subject to periodic flooding during wet yeax. He indicated that the ptoposed building finished floox elevation would be at 1,265. Lasdy, he indicated that construcrion of block wall along the mentioned pxopexty lines would fi~thex amelioxate the aesthetic impact. Planning and Code Enfoxcement Manager Villa xecommended to the Planning Coiiuiussion to Adopt a Resolution based on the Findings, Exhibits, and subject to the Conditions of Appxoval. He indicated that the applicant was pxesent this evening to answex any quesrions that the Coxnmission may have. Cha~man Barnes xequested comments fxom the public. Gary Washburu, Lake ELsinoxe, repxesenting Narman Bxody Industeies indicated that he would like to ad~ess Conditions No. 19, 22, 37, 44 and 47 with the Coixuxussion and Staff. Kelly Collins, Directox of Opexarions, xepxesenting the John Henry's Company 32371 Coiydon Street He indicated that they cursendy had between 60 to 80 employees, and an opexarion in Temecula and would like to have the entixe opexation xan in the City of Lake Elsinoxe. Mr. Washburn xequested clarification on Condirion No. 19 comments on the Quonset Huts would be removed, and thexefoxe, the Condirion could be modified. He indicated that the caxetakex would continue to xemain and woxk out of a teailex. NLx. Washburn requested to clarify Condition No. 22 which discussed walls on the southem and noxthern pxoperty lines. He stated that his concerns with the wall on the noxth side due to ~ainage during heavy xain. He xequested to have this Condition deleted. He stated that Condirions No. 37 and 45 ase redundant. He xequested to haoe Condition No. 45 xeinain and delete Condirion No. 37. PAGE 10 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 16, 2003 Mx. Washburn indicated that Condirion No. 47 discussed xecipxocal paxking. He stated that if xecipxocal pasking would be pxovided, it could eventually a problem. Community Development D'uectox Bxady asked Staff if thexe would be adequate pazking fox each paxcel. Planning Managex and Pazking Enfoxcement Managex Villa indicated "yes", howevex, thexe is a concern with c~cularion. Mx. Washburn indicated that it could be addressed in the CCR'S. Noxman Bxody, applicant fox the pxoject indicated that he had no comments and would be available fox discussion. Thexe being no fuxthex comments, discussion was bxought back to the Coimnission fox comments. Vice Chauwoman Matthies indicated that she liked the design of the building. She asked Staff if they agxeed to the modifications to Condirions. City Engineex O'Donnell indicated that the woxding on Condition No. 37 should xead, "The site shall be ~aded to minimi~e the effects of dxainage going off site." Vice Chaixwoman Matthies asked Mx. Washburn if he agseed to the woxding. Mx. Washbum indicated "yes." Vice Chairwoman Mattlves asked if Staff agxeed to modify Conditions No. 44. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that if the applicant could pxovide pxoof in writing from the Asmy Corp of Engineexs he would agree to change the Condirion. Vice Chauwoman Mattlues indicated that the Condition would xemain until the applicant pxovided pxoo£ She asked why Staff was xequesting that the applicant pxovide a block wall landscape enhancements. Planning and Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa indicated that block wall and addirional landscaping would help with noise. Coimnissioner Nash suggested enhancing the landscaping by planting moxe matuxe txees, and deleting the noxth and south walls. He indicated that he would pxefex to see teees xathex than a block wall. Chairuian Baxnes pointed out that the wall would be needed along the narth side because of the loading docks. He stated that the wall should xemain on the south side to xeduce the noise issue to the eicisting mobile home paxk. Mx. Washburn indicated that all stoxage would xemain inside. He also agxeed to have Condirion No. 22 modified. Vice Chauwoman MattUies had no fuxthex comments. PAGE 11 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 16, 2003 Cotiuivssionex Nash had no fuxthex comments. Coisuiussion Uhlxy concuxxed cvith the Coimnission and had no farthex comments. Comnussioner LaPexe concuxxed with the Coinmission. Community Development Dixectox Bxady noted that although extensive landscaping would be added, thexe would still be noise. He indicated that Staff would woxk with the applicant on this issue. Chauinan Barnes asked what type of fence eicisted. Platuiuig and Code Enfoxcement Dixectox Villa indicated chain link fence. Chainnan Basnes asked if it was in good condition ox would need to be xepaixed Coinmissionex Uhhy indicated that he dxove by the pxopexty xecendy, and indicated that it was was good condition. Thexe being no fixxther comments from the Coiiunission, Chaixman Bames closed the Public Hearing at 7:45 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Resolurions. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-83, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF DESIGN REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL NO. 2002-08, TO BE LOCATED ON CORYDON ROAD, TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS NOTED IN THE MINUTES. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-84, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-]2, WHICH ENTAILS THE ALLOWING METAL WAREHOUSE BUILDING WITHIN THE AIRPORT USE AREA OF THE EAST T.AKF: SPECIFIC PLAN, PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 7.5.SB TO BE LOCATED AT APN 370-120-0G2. 6. Variance No. 2003-05 Minor Design Review No. foc the Commercial Sign Progtam fot Canyon Estates Dtive and Summer Hill Dxive. Coiiunissionex LaPexe excused hixnself fxom this poxtion of the meeting at 7:58 PM Chavtnan Barnes opened the Public Heaxing at 7:58 PM and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. PAGE 12 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 16, 2003 Community Development Dixectox Brady indicated that this item had been continued and xequested Associate Plannex Millex to xeview the Staff Repoxt with the Coinmission. Associate Plannex Millex stated that this was a xequest fox a continuance on a iequest fox a vaxiance fot an ovexsize freeway idenrification sign and a Sign Pxogram fox a commezcial centex located at Canyon Estates Drive. She indicated that pxoject had been continued £xom the August 19, Planning Cominission because the Sign Pxogxam was not complete and the pxoposed Fxeeway Sign was not acceptable. She indicated that the applicant was xequested to xeduce between 250 to 350 squaxe feet, which would be inconsistent with the signs in the iinmediate axea. Associate Planner Millex stated that the pxoposed sign was appxoximately 752 squaxe feet, and thexefoze the applicant did not comply with Staff's xequest. Associate Plannei Millex indicated that the applicant had calculated the text fox the wording which only equates to 442 squaxe feet. She indicated that the text fox the City Centex sign is appxo~xnately 238 squaxe feet, which is about half the size of what the applicant is pxoposing. She stated that the City Centex Sign was paxt of the Specific Plan that would allow fox a laxgex sign, that that is why it is lazgex than what the Lake Elsinoxe Municipal Code states. Associate Pluinex Millex stated that Foxd was xecendy allowed to incxease thexe sign by 173 pexcent fxom what was allow in the code. She indicated that because the sign issue was not xesolved. Thexefoxe, she indicated that Staff's xecommendarion was to have the Vavance continued, and have the applicant xesubmit a moxe suitable plan. Associate Plannex Millex stated that the content issues wexe the pricing of the Shell Station, with movable nutnbers, and the movable tri-vision panels of the tenant signs. She stated that xegaxding the Sign Pxogxam, Staff listed a detailed coxxection, and if the applicant could agxee to these changes, Staff can xecommend the Planning Coimnission adopt a Resolution to appxove the Sign Ptogxam fox the Sutmnex Hill Commexcial Centex. She indicated that this xecommendarion wexe based on the xecommendarions on the Findings, Exhibits, and was subject to the Conditions of Appxoval. She indicated that pxiox to tonight's meeting, the applicant submitted a xevised Sign Pxogxam. She indicated that Staff had not xeviewed the submitted xevisions, howevex the applicant indicated to Staff that all of the coxxecrions wexe made. Chairnzan Barnes xequested comments from the public. N~. Salternelli, xepxesenting Abbacy Holding indicated that he made the necessary corrections with new ideas, and hoped that the Coinuiission would considex them. Cha~man Baxnes asked Mx. Salternelli if he agxeed to have the Vaxiance continued to the next Plaiuiing Conunission. iV~. Salternelli agxeed. PAGE 13 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 16, 2003 Mx. Tun Pitts, xepxesenting Censo~ce indicated that he xeceived Staff's xecommendations yestexday, and made the changes that Staff had xequested. He indicated that the coloxs might still have some issues; howevex, they wexe getting closex to what the City would like to see. Thexe being no furthex comments from the public, Chauman Baznes bxought the discussion back to the Comuussion fox comments. Cha.iiman Barnes indicated that he appTOVed of the coloring that has been selected. Vice Chairwoman Matthies concuxxed with Cha~man Barnes, and also indicated that she liked the looks of the letteTS. Coxxunission Nash stated that he agxees that the Sign Pxogxaxn looked good to him, as long as the applicant woxked with Staff on the xemaining issues. Coimnissionex Uhlry concuxxed with the Coxxunission and had no fuxther comments. Associate Plannex Millex xequested the Conunission add a Condirion that all signs would have a 5-foot set back from the pxopexty line, and that thexe would be cleax vision from all right-of-way. Deputy City Attomey Miles suggested having the discussion on the Agenda item which is on the laxgex sign. Chautnan Bames concuxxed. He asked the applicant if the total squaxe footage fox each face was 441.9. The applicant stated foi each side. He indicated that the xevised plans showed that they had xeduced the cluttex, and bxought the sign down fxom 66 squaxe feet to 72 square feet. Commissionex Uhlry indicated that he was glad to see the xeducrion of the sign. He asked the applicant if thexe was an incxease axound the tenant names. The applicant indicated "coxxect" He stated that the xevised plan looked clean, and hoped that the City would approved the design. Coimnissionex Uhhy stated that the original sign had eight names on the sign, and it appeaxed that they have been xeduced to foux. He asked if that is coxxect. The applicant indicated "coxxect." Conuiussionex Uhlxy stated that he would like to know what the squase footage wass fxom the top of the Washington Mutual straight down to the bottom of the CommeTCial Centex. He indicated that it would give him a moxe xealisric look. He also indicated that he wouldn't mind leaving the Shell sign as planned. PAGE 14 - PLANNING COMNIISSION MINUTES - Septembex 16, 2003 Planning and Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa indicated that the code give the ability to use an 8 stxaight-line to close the cixcle axea. Coinmissionex Uhlry asked if that would be included in the squaxe footage of the sign. Planning and Code Enfoxcement Managex indicated "yes." Commissionex Uhhy had no fuxtheT comments. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies concuzzed with Coinuussionex Uhlry. She stated that she ]iked the idea of the tri-panels. She had no fi~ther comments. Associate Plannex Millex indicated that the code stated "no movable signs." She also wanted to xemind the Coininission that Staff was looking fox a sign within the xange of 250 to 350 squaxe foot xange. She had indicated that Staff still feels that the sign was too laige. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies had no fixxthex comments. Cominissionex Nash asked the applicant how many tenants will thexe be The applicant stated he between two to tl~ee businesses, pex lot. Coimnissionex Nash indicated that at this time he did not have an issue cvith the size. He stated that he would pxefex to see ]um do something with the tenant spacing, to give everyone an oppoxtunity to have theix businesses successful. He had no fuxthex comments. The Cointnission all agxeed on the tri-panels, and bringing the sign down to appxoxnnately 475 squaxe feet in squaxe feet. The Couzmission all agxeed on using the Wal-Mart sign as a size example. The Coinuiission all agxeed that if the applicant could have the sign iange between 448 to 455 squaxe feet, then the Coimnission could be sarisfied. The applicant a~eed Staff agxeed. There being no fuxthex comments from the Coimnission, Chairman Bames closed the Public Heaxing at 9:00 PM, and xequested the reading of the Resolution. MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO HAVE VARIANCE NO. 2003- CONTINUED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON OCTOBER 07, 2003. PAGE 15 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 16, 2003 MOVED BY MATTHIES, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-85, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR SIGN PROGRAM LOCATED ON CANYON ESTATES DRIVE AND SUMMERHILL DRIVE-APN 363-100-056 Planning Coimnission took a five-minute xecess at 9:05 PM. Planning Coimnission xeconvened the meeting at 9:10 PM. Commission LaPexe xesumed the Planning Coininission Meeting at 9:10 PM. BUSINESS ITEMS Industrial Design Review No. I 2003-04 for a 6.826 square foot Service Bay and Stocage Building located at APN 377-120-011. Coxsunissionex Uhhy excused hunself from the meeting due to a conflict of intexest at 9:10 PM. Chaixman Bames indicated that t6is item is a Business item, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Ditectox Brady introduced Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz to xeview the Staff Repoxt with the Coxmnission. Associate Planner Pxeisendanz stated that this was a new stoxage and service building. He indicated that the pxoposed service and stoxage building would be located in the ieax and side pxopexty lines at the e~sting California Skiex business, west of Colliex Avenue and south of Rivexside Drive. He stated that the zoning fox the building is considexed Lunited Manufactuxed (M-1). He indicated that the building is a 6,826 squaxe foot building to include a 4,000 squaxe foot seivice bay axea, and a 2,826 square foot stoxage axea. Associate Plamiex Pxeisendanz indicated that the applicant would be pxoviding 11 parking spaces along Industxial Centet Way and an additional 8 paxking spaces on parcel 3 to include 1 handicap paxking space. He indicated that the~ would be two access driveways off Industrial Centex Way. He stated that the ezcisting chain-link fence would be xemoved and xeplaced with wxought-ixon fencing. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz indicated that the pxoposed azchitectuxal design of the building was consistent with the industry standaxds. He stated that the building would be finished with smooth sanded stucco. He indicated that the building would be divided up PAGE 16 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 16, 2003 into thxee secrions, which would be painted in diffexent coloxs. He stated that the applicant was pxoposing to pxovide 1,637 squaxe feet of landscaping. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz indicated that Staff xecommends appxoval of this pxoject based on the Findings, Eachibits, and subject to the Conditions of Appxoval. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz indicated that a few of the Engineeiing poxrion of the Condirions of Appxoval needed to be modified ox deleted and indicated that City Engineer O'Donnell concuxxed with the xecommendarion. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz indicated that Condirions No. 25, 26, and 27 could be deleted, and City Engineex O'Donnell concurxed. He stated that Condition No. 28 could be modified to add the woxding "if necessaiy the applicant shall pxocess and meet all parcel mexgex xequirements priar to the issuance to the building permit." He indicated that the City and the applicant have agxeed to this modification. He indicated that Condirion No. 29 should also be modified to the correct calculation of the traffic mitigation fees. He noted that Condirion No. 31 should also be modified to xead, "Construct sidewalk and install no paxking signs along Industsial Center Way, to facilitate two-way traffic. Plans must be appxoved and signed by the City Engineex, priox to the issue of a building permit." He indicated that City Engineex O'Donnell conc~s with the xevisions. He noted that because of the xevision of Condition No. 31, the applicant has xequested to delete Condition No. 32. Howevex, accoxding to City Engineex O'Donnell, Condirion No. 32 must xemain. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz had no fuxthex comments. Chairman Baxnes xequested the applicant to appxoach the podium. Chuck Sacks, applicant fox California Skiex indicated that he would be available to answez any questions that the Coimnission might have. Thexe being no fuxthex comments from the public, discussion was bxought back to the Coxsunission. Coxsunissionex LaPexe asked City Engineex O'Donnell if Condirion No. 31 would help with traffic. City Engineex O'Donnell indicated "yes." Coimzussionex LaPexe had no futthex coinments. Cominissionex Nash asked the applicant if he owned pazcel No. 5. Mr. Sacks indicated "no." Commission Nash asked the applicant whexe he intended on stoxing the boats. Mx. Sacks stated that they would xemain on display until they ase sold. PAGE 17 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 16, 2003 Coniinissionex Nash had no fiudiex comments. Vice Chaiiwoman Mattl~ies asked the applicant if he agreed to all of the othex Conditions of Appxoval. N~. Sacks indicated `~es." Chauinan Bames indicated that he liked the design, and had no fuxthex comments. Thexe being no furthex comtnents, Cha.vinan Barnes xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY MATTHIES, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-8G, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. I 2003-04, TO BE LOCATED ON INDUSTRIAL CENTER WAY, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 377-120-011, TO INCLUDE THE NOTED MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. Plannuig Coinmission Uhlry xeconvened the meeting at 9:20 PM. 8. Minot Design Review of a Single Familv Residence located at 16911 Gunnecson Stteet. Chairman Bames xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that tlus is a Minox Design Review of a Single Fatnily Residence, and xequested Associate Plannex Millex xeview it with the Conunission. Associate Plannex Millex indicated that this is an appxoval fox a 1, 508 squaxe foot pxe- manufactured home to include a 440 squaxe foot gaxage to be constructed on a 9,000 squaze foot lot. She indicated that the applicant has added a 100 square foot covexed poxch. She stated that the exteriox of the unit would use the horizontal siding with masonxy trim on the pillass of the poxch and the base of the unit. Associate Plannei Millex indicated that Staff xecommended approval based on the Findings, Exhibits and subject to the Conditions ofAppxoval. Cha~man Barnes requested comments fxom the Public. Maiy Chrisriansen, 16875 Gunnexson Steeet, Lake Elsinoxe indicated that she was a xesident of the County Club Heights and xequested information on the pxoceduxes on finding out about Zoning, how many manufactuxed homes axe allowed within the City, vexses srick built homes, specificallp in that axea. PAGE 18 - PI.ANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 16, 2003 Coisuiussionex Nash stated that at this point, if the manufact~ed homes meet all of the specific codes, and ininiinum xequixement, then the City cannot say that they could not put one on a lot. Ms. Christiansen asked if a permanent foundation meant a slab. Chauman Baxnes indicated that it is a perinanent xaised foundarion. Coxmnissioner Nash indicated that it is a State Law that foxbids the Citp from not allowing pre-manufactuxed homes in the City. Ms. Chrisriansen asked if their wexe any way that exua Conditions of Appxoval that aze necessaiy fox the Historical Doumtown District. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that the Historical Downtown District has code xequixements in oxdex to get appxoval to build in the Docvntown axea. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies added that Staff was good at making s~e that all of the manufact~ed homes that axe appxoved meet all of the xequ~ements. Ms. Cl~isriansen indicated that they axe appxoved so quickly. Coininissionex LaPexe indicated that the City is cuxrendy conducting a Land Use Study wit6in the County Club Heights axea. He indicated that the xesidents in the axea would be notified once this pxoced~e has been finalized. Ms. Chrisriansen asked what the time would be. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that it should be finalized within the next sis weeks. Ms. Christiansen had no f~thex comments. Chairman Barnes asked if the applicant was pxesent. Community Development D~ectox Bxady indicated "no." Thexe being no fiixtliex comments fxom the public, discussion was bxought back to the Commission. Commission LaPexe had no cominents. Commissionex Nash had no comments. Vice Chauwoman Matthies thanked Ms. Christiansen for having the parience to stay fox this veiy long meeting, and undexstood hex concerns. PAGE 19 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 16, 2003 Coimnissionex Uhlry had no comments. Chavman Barnes had no comments. Thexe being no fuxthex comments fxom the Coinuiission, Chautnan Basnes xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-87, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT LOCATED AT 16911 GUNNERSON STREET APN 378-181-021 & 023. 9. Minor Design Review of a Single Family Residence located at 16373 Arnold Avenue Chaixman Barnes indicated that tlvs is a Business item, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development D~ectox Bxady indicated that this is a xequest fox a Single Fatnily Residential home, and xequested Community Development Technician Hennings to xeview it with the Coininission. Community Development Technician Hennings stated that this is a request fox a Minox Design Review fox a 1,026 squaxe foot manufact~ed home with a 400 squaxe foot attached gaxage, in the axea knoam as Countsy Club Heights. She indicated that the xesidence would occupy appxoxixnately 28 pexcent of the 5,025 squaxe foot lot. She indicated that the applicant would pxovide decoxarive shuttexs and dooxs, and the fxont yaxd would be landscaped with automatic sprinkler system. She stated that the applicant would consteuct a 6-foot high wooden fence on the side and xeax pxopexty lines. Community Development Technician Hennings indicated that this pxoject meets all of the xequiuements of the LEMC, and thexefore Staff xecommends appxoval based on the Findings, E~chibits, and subject to the Condirions of Appxoval. Community Development Technician Hennings indicated that the applicant could not be pxesent fox tonight's meeting. Chaitman Bames xequested comments fxom the public. Thexe being no comments from the public, discussion was bxought back to the Cominission fox comments. Coinmissionex Uhlxy had no comments. Vice Chauwoman Matthies had no comments. PAGE 20 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 16, 2003 Coimnissionex LaPexe had no comments. Coinuiissionex Nash had no comments. Chairman Bames indicated that this xesidences looks very plain. He asked Staff if thexe is a poxch. Community Development Technician Hennings indicated that the applicant did not include a poxch, but did include decoxarive shutters. Chauman Basnes asked if thexe was a concxete step up to the fxont of the house. Community Development Technician Hennings indicated "yes." Chaiunan Barnes had no furthex comments. Thexe being no furdiex coxnments, Chaixman Barnes xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND DENIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO WITHOUT PREJUDICE MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 16373 ARNOLD AVENUE APN 378-212-027. INFORMATIONAL NONE STAFF COMMENTS Community Development Dixectox Bxady commented on the following: • Noted that the Cxeekside Pazk would be dedicated on Wednesday, Septembex 24 at 4:30 PM. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chaixman Bames commented on the followine: • No comments Vice Chauwoman Matthies commented on the followine: • No comments PAGE 21 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Septembex 16, 2003 Coinmissionex Uhlrv commented on the` following; • He indicated that he has xeceived many calls fxom the othex half of xeflections off Ontaxio and Gxand Street xegaxding the landscaping. Conuirissionex Uh1xy xequested that this issue needs to be looked into. • He also inquixed the cuxb & guttex at the driving range on Lakeshoxe. He stated that he thought it was added to the Conditions, and has now been ovex two yeass. He would like to have t6is issue looked into. Cominissionex Nash commented on the followina: • No comments. Corrunissionex LaPexe comtnented on the followinQ: • No comments. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY NASH SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 9:45 PM. BARNES, CHAIRMAN Respectfiilly Submitted x.e-cl.I,(,~:. C%C/~ ~ Dana C. Poxche' Office Specialist III MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, OCTOBER 07, 2003 Chauinan Barnes called the Regulax Planning Coxsunission Meeting of Octobex 07, 2003 to oxdex at 6:02 PM. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissionex Uhlxy. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, MATTHIES, NASH, LAPERE & UHLRY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Also pxesent wete: Community Development Dixectox Bxady, Plamiing & Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa, Seniox Plannex Morita, Associate Plannex Millex, Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz, City Engineex O'Donnell, Community Development Technician Hennings, and Deputy City Attorney Miles. PUBLIC COMMENTS None CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY LAPERE SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. Minutes: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of September 16, 2003 would be considexed on the zegular Planning Commission Meeting of October 07, 2003. PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Octobex 07, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. "Conrinued" Variance 2003-05 and Amendment to Minor Design Review fot a Si~n Program for a pronosed commercial center located at Canvon Estate Dxive and Summerhill Drive (APN 363-350-015~ Chaixuzan Barnes opened the Public Hearing at 6:05 PM, and xequested the reading of the Staff Report. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that this was a xequest fox a Vaiiance for a Fxeeway Idenrificarion sign in the pxoposed commexcial centex, and xequested Associate Plannex Millex to xeview it with the Coimzrission. Associate Plannex Millex indicated tlus is a xequest fox a Vaxiance fox the approval of a Fxeeway Idenrification Sign. She indicated that this pxoject has been to sevexal Planning Commissions Meetings, at which both the Minox Design Review and Variance wexe continued. She stated that the Sign Pxogxam was appxoved on Septembex 16; howevex, she indicated that it excluded the Fxeeway Sign, which was why this item was being pxesented this evening as an Addendutn. Associate Plannex Millex that the c~rent Fxeeway Sign had been xeduced in axea and height, howeveT the sign axea still exceeded the axea sizes accoxding to the LEMC, and would xequ~e a variance, if appxoved. She indicated that the height of the sign was xeduced from 72 feet 6 inches to 66 feet 0 inches, a 6-foot xeducrion. She stated that the plan that was being considexed that evening is 443 squaxe feet. Associate Plannex Millex indicated that Staff consideTed using a 4-line sign axea. She indicated that Staff used the Suininexlull Centex 4-line sign azea fox comparison. She stated that the applicant had xemoved the pricing from the Shell Gas Starion poxrion of the sign as xequested, and the tri-vision panels xemained, howevex would not be the xotating ox anunated sign xefexxed in the Code. Associate Plannex Miller stated that Staff felt that with the xeductions of the sign asea and height and othex xequested changes that the Fxeeway Idenrification Sign moxe closely compaxe to the appxoved City Centex sign. She indicated that Staff xecommended that the Planning Coimnission considex appxoving the Amendment to the Sign Pxogxam and Fxeeway Idenrificarion Sign fox the SLUmnexhill Commexcial Centex, based on the Findings, Exhibits, and is subject to the Conditions of Appxoval. She indicated that the applicant was pxesent to answex any questions. Chaixman Barnes xequested comments from the public. Titn Pitts, Censouxce, Anaheim indicated that they woxked cvith Staff to come up with a design a~eeable by all pasties. He had no fi~thex comments. l~. Saltaxelli, Abbacy Holding, Lake Elsinoxe conc~xed cvith Mx. Pitts, and hoped that the Planning Coinmission appxoved the xevised sign plans. PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Octobex 07, 2003 Thexe being no further comments, discussion was bxought back to the Coixuxussion fox comments. Coimnissionex LaPere indicated that he was glad to see that the pxicing fxom the Shell Gas Starion was xemoved. He asked Community Development Dixectox Bxady on the coxrect procedi~es that the Conunission should have when a Variance was not in confoxxnance cvith the City's Code. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that the Coimnission had some lead ways on what they can and can't appxove. He stated that Coiiuivssion could make a determination on how fax and what they can do to bring it up to confoxmance. Coimnissionex LaPexe asked if it was just fox this item. Community Development Dixectox Bxady just fox this situarion. Conunissionex LaPexe indicated that the applicant came a long way to get dvs sign appxoved and wanted to e~cpxess his appxeciation fox woxking with Staff in oxdex to get the sign appxoved. He had no fuxthex comments. Vice Chairwoman Matthies concuxxed with counnissionex LaPexe. She also wanted to thank the applicant fox keeping the diesel and gas sepaxate, pex hex xequest. She had no fuxthex comments. Coinuiissionex Uhlry indicated that he was happy to see that the sign has been xeduced, and had no fuxthex comments. Conuiussion Nash stated that it was a great comprise. He stated that moxe than likely the City would see moxe txi-panel designs. He had no fiuthex comments. Chaiunan Baxnes concursed with the Coixuiussion and had no fixtther comments. Thexe being no fuxthex comments, Chauman Baxnes closed the Public Hearing at 6:15 PM and xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-89, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 2003-05 SIGN AREA AND HEIGHT OF A FREEWAY IDENTIFICATION SIGN LOCATED IN A COMMERCIAL CENTER (SUMMERHILL COMMERCIAL CENTER) AT CANYON ESTATES DRIVE AND SUMMERHILL DRIVE - APN 363-100-05G. PAGE 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Octobex 07. 2003 3. Conditional Use Pexmit No. 2003-13 and Design Review for Commexcial Ptoject No C 2003-05. Chaixman Barnes opened the Public Heaxing at 6:16 PM, and xequested the reading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Director Bxady indicated that at the xequest of Staff this item would need to be xe-noticed, and thexefoxe xequested to have this item xeviewed at the next Planning Coinmission. Chaixman Bames asked the Cossuiussion if they concurred with this xequest. Hearing no objecrion, Chaixman Barnes closed the Public Hearing at 6:18 PM. 4. Tentative Parcel Map No. 31218, Kid's in Action. Chainnan Bames opened the Public Hearing at 6:17 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that tUis was a xequest fox a Tentarive Paxcel Map and xequested Associate Plannex Millex to xeview it with the Coxsunission. Associated Plannex Millex indicated that the Paxcel Map was located at 31918 Mission Txail in the Genexal Commexcial asea of the City of Lake Elsinoxe southwest of Intexstate 15. She stated that the poxtion of an original paxcel map known as Paxcel Map No. 19261 was appmved in the late 1970's. She indicated that the eaTliex map consisted of four commexcial paxcels. Associated Plannex Millex stated that the applicant was zequesting to subdivide Paxcel No. 2 of the Paxcel Map 19261 into 2 paxcels. She stated that the patcel map was a pxoject to develop a commexcial centex that includes a Statex Bxos maxket. She indicated that this pxoject was exempted fxom the California Envixonmental Quality Act (CEQA). Associated Plannex Millex xecommended appxoval of this pxoject based on the Findings, Exhibits, and subject to the Conditions of Appxoval. She indicated that the applicant was present to answex any questions that the Coiumission may have. Chauinan Barnes xequested comments from the public. Thexe being no comments, discussion was bxought back to the Comnvssion fox discussion. Coxsunissionex Nash asked Staff wluch parcels the applicant was puxchasing. Associated PLlnnex Millex stated that it was a newly developed paxcel #1. Commissionex Nash asked if it was originally two paxcels. Associated Plannex Millex stated "yes." PAGE 5- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Octobex 07, 2003 Conunissionex Nash had no fiudier comments. Coxxunissionex LaPexe had no comments. Vice Chaiiwoman Matthies had no comments. Commissionex Uhlxy had no comments. Chairman Bames had no comments. Thexe being no fixxthex comments, Chaixman Barnes closed the Public Heaxing at 6:20 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY MATTHIES, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-90, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAI' 3i218 (APN 363-172-007, 010, 0i2) 5. Lakeshore Village Specific Plan, Genetal Plan Amendment No. 2003-02, Zone Change No. 2003-03, and Mitigated Negative Declaiation No. 2003-03 Cha~man Bames opened the Public Hearing at 6:24 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that tl~is item befoxe the Coimnission is a xequest fox appxoval of a Lakeshoxe Village Specific Plan, Genexal Plan Amendment No. 2003-02, Zone Change No. 20003-03, and Mitigated Negative Declasarion No. 2003-03. He xequested that Seniox Plannex Morita xeview them with the Coinmission. Seniox Plannex Moxita stated that the pxoject is located neaz the westexly end of the Lake Elsinoxe west-central poxtion of the City. He indicated that out of the foux applicarions that have been submitted, the pumaiy application is the Specific Plan. He indicated that the Specific Plan divides the azea into fo~ spate Planning ATes, each of which vaxies from xesidential and commexcial uses. He stated that the xesidential axea was planned for 176 single-family detached units within this 23.5-acxe axea. He indicated that the minim~ lot size would be 3,500 and the aveTage lot size would be 3,825 squaxe feet. He indicated that the applicant pxoject that appxo~mately 185 attached xesidenrial units (apaxhnents) could be constxucted within tlus 103-acxe Planning Axea, which xepxesents a density of about 18.0 units pex acxe. He noted that the neighboxhood Commexcial Planned axea is appro~cimately 12,000 squaxe feet of gross building axea. He stated that it should be noted that the neighboxhood commexcial building(s), the undexlying site plan, xoadway impxovements, and ox public utiliries have not yet been designed. Lasdy, he indicated that eithex the Commexcial /Residenrial Flex Plamiing Axea would be attached xesidenrial or neighboxhood commexcial uses would be constructed on about thxee acxes. PAGE 6- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Octobex 07, 2003 Seniox Plannex Morita stated that Staff xecommends appxoval of this pxoject based on the Findings, E~chibits, and subject to the Condirions of Appxoval. He indicated that the applicant is pxesent this evening to answex any quesrions that the Coixuiussion may have. Chaiunan Basnes xequested comments from the Public. Gary Washbuxn, City of Lake Elsinoxe xepxesenting the applicant stated that he would be available to answex any quesrions that the Conuzussion may have. Chuck Txeath, Developex and applicant fox the project stated that he is very excited about this pxoject, and eagex to get staxted. He stated that he would be available to answex any questions that the Coxsuivssion may have. Elbext Smith, 4491 E. Ridge Gate Road, Anaheim Hills stated that he owns 2'/z acxes neax the pxoject in discussion and was concerned with the cureent zoning. He indicated that he leaxned about this project one week ago, and wanted to voice his opinion. He stated that changing his cuxxent Zoning is not acceptable. He stated that he has a lettex from WCI dated 10/28/2002, fxom Gaxy Washburn. He stated that the last sentence of the lettex states, "Oux plans and planning pxocess will begin independendy of yoar pxopexty." Ivlr. Smith indicated that this is what he is xequesting. He stated that the developex could develop the~ pxopexty axound his pxoperiy, cvith its cwsent zoning along Lakeshoxe Drive. He concluded by saying that he would like lils zoning to remain Commexcial, and the developer is welcome to place a pxoposed development adjacent to eithex side of his paxcel. He indicated that he would be open fox fuxthex negoriarions. Rita Wilsey, 15015 Lincoln, Lake Elsinoxe indicated that she has a concern with the xesidenrial poxtion of this application. She stated that she has an existing business in the faz coxnex of the pxoposed development, and would like to see possibly adding a buffex between the xesidential and business asea. She also objected to the small lots that the applicant was pxoposing. Chainnan Barnes xequested any futthex comments from the Public. Hearing no fixxthet comments, discussion was bxought back to the Coinwission for comments. Coininissionex LaPexe asked if the applicant if he has included all of the pascels in axea in his application, ox only the paxcels that they aze developing. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that the City would like to see consistency with the zoning between all of the pxoperties. He stated that if propexties axe changed a zoning ar leave zoning as is, the quesrion might arise as to whethex ox not the pTOpexty could be developed. He stated that it might also cxeate a spot zone, which was not accepted in the City. PAGE 7- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Octobex 07. 2003 Coi7unissionex LaPeze stated that he a~ees with the consistency. He indicated that he is glad to see the gated community cvith in the City, even though they would be small lots. He asked Staff if what ate pzovisions that have been made fox Elsinoxe Valley Rental. Seniox Plannex Morita indicated that theix would be a decoxative block wall on all sides of the pxoject. Cotmzussionex LaPexe suggested that if we wexe going to change the Zoniug, then he would like to all of the paxceLs changed. He had no fuithex comments. Cotiunissionex Uhlxy stated that he is not happy with the Commexcial Retail Fle~ble. He indicated that he does not want to see apaxtments along the inain thozough faxes. He indicated that the front portion of the pazcels would be worth something; howevex, the poxrion in the xeax would be woxthless. He stated that the lots axe too narxow and Iv~. Smith would be bettex off negotiating with the applicant He concurxed with Connnissionex LaPexe that the paxcels should all be consistent. Coimnissionex LaPexe asked the applicant if he agrees to the Conditions of Appxoval. IVIr. Chuck Txeath stated "yes." Vice Chau~cvoman Matthies concurxed with the Coimiiission xegaxding the Zoning issue. She also agxeed that the lots axe small and would be difficult to develop. She xesponded to the issue xegaxding smallex lots. She indicated that when you have smallex lots, you could only place smaller units, which in tum means lowex pxices. She indicated that hopefully the gated community would pxotect the value. She suggested that we might want to incxease the height of the wall. Couimissionex Uhlry suggested that single-stoxy units neax the xental yaxd might be ptefexxed to two story units. Mx. Chuck Treath stated that he was willing to woxk with Staff about the walls. Regaxding the Commexcial Retail Fle~ble Zoning, he stated that this pascel has been Zoned CRF fox many yeaxs. Coinmissionex Uhhy stated that he doesn't like seeing all of the Commexcial Zoning gone. Mr. Chuck Txeath stated that he would like the use left as Commexcial Retail Flexible. Commissionex Uhlxy asked Steve asked if it should be an Oxdinance or Resolution, and would it lock us in. Deputy City Attoxney Miles stated that the effective date of an Oxdinance would make the diffexence. He stated that Commexcial Retail Fle~ble Zoning designation allows the flexibility with out xequiring an amendment. PAGE 8- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - October 07, 2003 Cominissionex Nash asked if thexe wexe any existing commexcial buildings. He asked if that is whexe the neighboxhood Commexcial Zoning cuxxendy is. Seniox Plannex stated that he believes that azea axe in the neighboxhood Commexcial. Coiiuiussionex Nash asked if they would be splitting the lots as an entrance to the Design Review axea. He asked the applicant why he did not caxxy the CRF to the top of the attached iesidential axea. Mx. Txeatch indicated that in the analysis that was conducted, they xecommended the area about 2.6 acxes would fit bettex into the maxket. Coimxussioner Nash indicated that he would prefex to see the CRF go along the fxontage of Lakeshoxe. He indicated this would addxess NIr. Smith's concerns. Seniox Plannex Morita indicated that he spoke with 1~. Smith a few days ago, priot to the appxoval of the Lake Shoxe Village. He indicated that a Condition would be added that would state, "Priar to the appmval of the final Lakeshoxe Village Specific Plan by the Community Development Dixectox, the Specific Plan shall be xevised to show that the pxoposed attached xesidential axea, presenfly shown in the dxaft docutnents shall be xe- designated as Commexcial Residenrial Flex Pluuiuig Axea." Couunissionex Nash stated that this would not be his suggesrion. He stated that as the CRF has been shorten on Lakeshoxe, to enhance the basic Commexcial axea of Lakeshore, and believes that the depth was pxopex at that point. He suggested xe-woxding the Condition. He had no furthex comments. Coiiunissionex LaPexe conc~xed with Connirission Nash to have the consistency of the Zoning along the fxont of Lakeshoxe. He indicated this would benefit IV~. Smith's pxopexty, as it would become moxe valuable. Seniox Plannex wanted to clarify with the Commission that the Zoning along Lakeshore would become CommeLCial Neighboxhood. Comnnssionex Uhhy indicated the e~sting would xemain Commexcial Neighboxhood, and then the purpose CRF would be acxoss the Detached Residential and in &ont of the Attached Residential. Chautxian Baxnes asked Community Development Dixectox Bxady on his thoughts. Community Development Directox Bxady suggested that if the Couunission desixes to allow the area in discussion to be developed with Attached Residenrial, to haoe the CRF designation thexe, wl~ich would give the axea fle~bility. The Coxrunission concuxxed. IV~. Sxnith indicated that he was in agxeement with the xe-designation of the CRF. PAGE 9- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Octobex 07, 2003 Seniox Plannex Morita suggested the pxoposed Condirion to xead, "Priox to the approval of the final Lakeshoxe Specific Plan, the draft Specific Plan shall be xevised, to show that the attached pxoposed Residenrial Plazining Axea will allow the frontage along Lakeshoxe Drive at the depth that is consistent with the depth of the e~cisting CRF Axea, shall be xe-designated as pxoposed CRF designation. The Commissionex concuxxed with tl~is xevision. Seniox Plannex Moxita also indicated that he suggested another Condirion that would address the ~ea to the east that would xead as follows, "Priox to Design Review appxoval of the Detached Residential Planning Axea, the applicant shall design plans to ensure that adjacent uses along the eastern pe~metex shall be adequately scxeened from noise and view distarbances." Deputy Steve Mile suggested modifying Condition No. 28 as well to xead, "The applicant shall entex into an agreement with the Redevelopment Agency, and acceptable to Agenry CouncIl and to eithex pxovide portable unit in accoxdance with Secrion 33413B2 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, appxop~iate in lieu of fees, ox a Condirion, ox a accommodation of both." Community Development Dixectox Bxady suggested xevising Condirion No. 30 to xead, "The applicant shall annex into the City Wide Community Faciliries Distsict fox safety (CFD _1~ „ Cha~man Baxnes asked if the Counnission or Staff had any futthex comments. Thexe being no f~ther comments, Cha~man Barnes closed the Public Hearing at 7:15 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Resolutions. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-91, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF T.AKF' ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2003-03, TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATION TO THE MENTIONED CONDITIONS. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-92, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-02 TO AMEND THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FROM "GENERAI. COMMERCIAL " TO "FUTURE SPECIFIC PLAN Q" TO ALLOW THE LAKESHORE VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATION TO THE MENTIONED CONDITIONS. PAGE 10 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - OctobeT 07, 2003 MOVED BYNASH, SECONDED BYLAPEREAND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-93, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003-03 TO CHANGE TO ZONING DESIGNATION OFAPN379230-001,-002,-004,-006,008, 009,-0010,-011, AND -012 FROM "C-2 (GEIVERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT)" AND "GP(COMMERCIAL PARS DISTRICT)" TO "LAKESHORE VILLAGE SPECIFICPLAN." MOVED BY MATTHIES, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-94, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003-03 TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF APN 379-230-001,-002,-004,-006, -008, -009, -010, -011, AND -012 FROM °°C-2 (GENERAT. COMMERCIAL DISTRICT)"AND "C-P (COMMERCIAL PARK DISTRICT)" TO "LAKESHORE VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN" TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATION TO THE MENTIONED CONDITIONS. BUSINESS ITEMS 6. Minor Design Review of a Single Family residence located at 223 Matich Street (APN 374-111-010~ Cha~man Bames indicated that this is a Business item, and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that this is a xequest for a IvIDR of a Smgle Family Home, and xequested Associate Plannex Millex to xeview it with the Cominission. Associate Plannex Millex stated that this is a request fox appxoval of a Single Family Residence located on Marich Stseet neax Pottexy Steeet in the City's Histoxic Ovexlay Distsict. She indicated that the applicant has pxeviously xeceived appxoval from the Pluiivng Coimnission on April 1, 2003 fox Design Review of fo~ single-family pxe-manufactuxed homes. She stated that the applicant is pxoposing to place a 1,299 squaxe foot pre- manufactuxed home and to construct an attached 175 squaxe foot poxch on a 5,904 squaxe foot vacant lot. She stated that the fxont yard would be landscaped and would include an automatic iuigation system. Associate Plannex Miller stated that the base colox of the siding would be light gxay and the txun would be white. She indicated that daxk gxay asphalt shingle would be used as the xoofing matexial. She stated that Staff xecommends appxoval of the pxoject based on the Findings, E~chibits, and subject to the Condirions of Approval. She indicated that the applicant was not able to make the meeting this evening due to illness. PAGE 11 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Octobex 07, 2003 Chauman Barnes xequested comments fxom the Public. Thexe being no comments, discussion was bxought back to the Coisuiussion fox comtnents. Coixunissionex Nash asked Staff how well would the alley's be maintained. Associate Plannex Millex indicated that the applicant would be xequued to impxove the alleyway. Commissionex Nash had no fuxthex comments. Coimnissionex LaPexe indicated that he was glad to heax alley would be improved. He stated that this would be an enhancement to the asea. He had no futdiex comments. Coimnissionex Uhlry asked if the pxopexty is at Sumuex & Matich Associate Plannex Millex indicated "pes." Commissionex Uhlry had no fuxthex comments. Vice Chauwoman Matthies stated that the pxoject looks gxeat. She stated that she like the 1920's style of homes. She had no fuxthex comments. Chaixman Barnes concurxed with the Coimnission and had no fixxther comments. T'hexe being no furthex comments, Chaixtnan Barnes requested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-95, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT LOCATED AT 223 MATICH STREET - APN 374-111- 010. 7. Residential Design Review No. R 2003-12 for two (2~ new duplexes located Ca~ 307 N. Poe Street and 309 N. Poe Street. Chautnan Baxnes xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development D~ectox Bxady indicated that this is a Minox Design Review of a Single Fanvly Residence, and xequested Associate Plaunex Pxeisendanz xeview it with the Commission. Associate Planner Pxeisendanz stated that the applicant is xequesting appxoval fox two detached duplexes located on 307 and 309 N. Poe Steeet. He indicated that the pxoperty is PAGE 12 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Octobex 07, 2003 located in a Medium Density axea. He stated that the pxoject would include foux attached dwelling units, two detached garages, a tot lot, a BBQ axea, pxivate yasds, and xelated unpxovements. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz indicated that the pritnary issue that Staff has considexed was the mexging of the pascels. He indicated the applicant has declined on mexging the two pa~cels. He stated that Staff feels that cextain amenities would need to be accessible to the axea, and thexefoxe merging of the paxcels would be necessaxy. He also noted that should one lot be sold off, the~ could be a potenrial of a wall being cxeated down the pxoperty line, thus xestxicting access to cextain axeas of the complex. He indicated that the applicant stated that the CC&R's could addxess this issue fxom happening. Associate PLnnnex Pxeisendanz xequested that the Pluining Commission make a decision xegaxding the pxoposed pxoject considexation be given to the question of inexging the paxcels. He indicated that Staff xecommends adopting a Resolurion based on the Findings, Exhibits, and subject to the Conditions of Appxoval. He stated that the applicant is pxesent this evening to answex any quesrions that the Comtnission might have. He also indicated that if the pxoject is approved, then Condition No. 30 should be deleted. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated that Condition No. 10 has a tppo, and needs to be modified to state Poe Stseet, and not Machado Street. Chaiunan Baxnes xequested the applicant to appxoach the podium. Jackie Fenaxoli, 23663 Pepperleaf Street, Muxrieta, CA indicated that she xespectfully declines the xequests to mexge the lots. She indicated that the financing and paxtnexship agxeement both xefexence two legal lots. She noted that the CC&R's could addxess these concerns. She also indicated that it would be difficult to sell the lots sepasately. She also indicated that Condirion No. 19 she would like to see be deleted, as both paxcels had pxevious stnxctixxes that wexe demolished. She indicated that the TUMF Oidinance pxovides exemptions. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that Staff could look at this secrion of the Oxdinance, howevex he stated that if thexe was an increase in units, then she would have to pay the fees. City Engineex O'Donnell asked the applicant if the lots wexe vacant when you puechased the land. Ms. Fenaxoli indicated "yes." City Engineex O'Donnell stated that the intent of the Oxdinance was to look at new structuxes. He stated that the intent of the Oxdinance was to give someone a bxeak if they own the pxoperty and they xebuild theix pxoperiy thxough a natuxal disastex. Community Development D~ectox Bxady indicated that the fees could not be waived. He stated that tlils issue might need to be bxought to the attention of the WRCOG. PAGE 13 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Octobex 07, 2003 Deputy City Attorney Miles stated that the applicant has brought up some good points. He stated that txaffic fees axe diffexent then the school fees and the physical baseline should be xeviewed. Ms. Fenaxoli asked the Conuirission that in oxdex fox tUis pxoject to pxoceed this evening, that she would need to pay all applicable fees. Chauman Basnes indicated "yes." Ms. Fenaxoli asked about the Txaffic Mirigated Oxdinance exemptions fox pxevious structuxes. Coimnissionex Uhlry indicated that this would be covexed undex the same discussion with the Attotney xegaxding the applicable'I`UMF fees. Ms. Fenaxoli asked about the Will Serve lettex. Commissionex Nash indicated that EVMWD would still chazge $75.00 Ms. Fenatoli indicated that she had no fixxthex comments. Chauinan Basnes brought the discussion back to the Coimiiission fox comments. Commissionex Nash stated that CC&R's could be used. He stated that the financial paxmexship is not the Plannuig Comnussions concexn. Coimnissionex Uhlty stated that one parcel has the most of the common axeas. He stated that it is nonnally done thxough a HOA, which would be covexed in the CC&R's. He suggested foxmuig an LLC between the two paxtnexships. Comuiissionex Nash stated that the City does not want to have to xefexee a CC&R'S dispute. Coxsunissionex LaPere stated that this is an accident waiting to happen. He indicated that it would be haxd to sell. He stated that he suggests an HOA would be beneficial. Vice Chaiiwoman Matthies concuxxed with Coininissionex LaPexe. Commissionet Uhlry stated that the way this pxoject was designed, thexe should be one p~cel. He stated that the tenants would suffex. He stated that he would not vote fox this pxoject unless these paxcels axe mexged. Comxnissionex Nash asked City Deputy Attorney Miles if HOA could be effective fox this pxoject. PAGE 14 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Octobex 07, 2003 City Deputy Attoxney Miles stated "yes." He stated that it is woxth the effoxt fox tl~is pxoject. He indicated it would take a lot of woxk, and may be easiex to look at the struct~e of the pazmexship agreement. Coiiuzussionex Nash stated that it would be very complex, and much sunplex to mexge the lots. He stated that the Coimnission is suggesting thinking about it. He stated that she has hex options in oxdex to pxoceed. Chaixman Barnes conc~xed. He stated that mexge the paxcels, submit two sepaxate pxojects, ar bxing a legal vessel that would adequately addxess the common axeas. Community Development Dixectox Brady stated that the Planning Coimnissionex could appxove the pxoject tonight with a paxcel mexgex. Howevex, he indicated that if the Coinmission decides to amend the pxoject at a latex date then the applicant could come back to the Planning Coinmission. Ms. Fenaxoli asked if Staff would look at the fees. Deputy City Attoxney Miles stated that the fees would be looked into uinnediately, howevex fox hex not to get hex hopes up to high. Chaixman Bames asked fox fuxthex comments fxom the Coinmission. Thexe being no fuxthex comments, Chauman Baxnes xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNAIVIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-96, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2003-12 FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF TWO (2) NEW RESIDENTIAL DUPLEXES AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS FOR JACHIE FENAROLI, TO BE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF N. POE STREET, NORTH OF SUMNER AVENUE AND SOUTH OF POTTERY STREET, WITHIN THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN DISTRICT AND APN: 374-053-014 AND 374-053-073 TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS OF THE MENTIONED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. 8. Residential Destin Review No. R 2003-09 fot fiftv (50) new single-family homes located wittun TTM No. 30670. Cha~man Barnes indicated that this is a Busmess Item and xequested fox the Staff Report. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that this pxoject is a xequest fox approval of a Residential Design Review of 50 now single-family homes, and xequested Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz to xeview it with the Conniussion. PAGE 15 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Octobex 07, 2003 Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated that this is a request fox approval fox 50 homes located within the TTM No. 30670. He mdicated that the pxoposal would include a model home complex consisting of thxee axchitectuxal designs xanging in size from 1,708 squaxe feet to 2,364 squaze feet. He stated that the pxoject is located on the east end of the City on the south side of Machado Street, between Gxand Avenue and Lincoln Street, with an axea identified by the Genexal Plan as sutuxe Specific Plan "P". Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated that the applicant was pxoposing thxee distinctive plans with vaxiable elevations and xevexse footprints. He indicated the axchitectuxal designs xange from Tuscany Spanish Colonial, and Elecuc Mediterranean and would offex a range of materials and coloxs. He indicated that the applicant would pxovide a masonry block wall along Machado, and landscaped plantex between the proposed sidewalks. Lasdy, he indicated that the sale office would be located within the gasage unit on lot 2, and would pxovide five paxking spaces one of which would be designated as a handicapped van accessible paxcel. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated that Staff xecommends appxoval of this pxoject, based on the Findings, E~chibits and subject to the Condirions of Appxoval. He indicated that Condirions No. 8, 9, 10 & 13 had the E~chibits lettexs were missing. He stated that Condirion No. 8 should have it listed as Eachibit "D". Condirion No. 9 should have listed Exhibit `B" &"F". Condirion No. 10 should have Exhibit listed as "E", and lasdy Condition No. 13 should have Eichibit listed as Exhibit "B.". He mdicated that the applicant was pxesent to answex any questions that the Coinuiission may have. Chautxian Barnes xequested comments fxom the Public. Cynthia Paige, 616 La Hazve Ave., Lake Elsinoxe CA stated that seveTal residents wexe going to be hexe this evening but could not make it. She stated that originally, the homes wexe all going to be single story to pxeseroe the views. She asked the Commission what the height would be of the wxought iron fence beriveen the homes and school. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz indicated that the wxought ixon fence would be 6-feet. Ms. Paige indicated that she has concerns with the easement. She stated that it needs to be maintained to prevent any fixe, and chilc~en fxom hiding in thexe. She had no fuxthei comments. Betty Baluski, 15750 Alvasado Street, Lake Elsinoxe. She stated that she excited to see the homes sepaxating the school fxom Alvarado Sueet. She stated that she has concerns because theTe axe no sidewalks along Alvaxado fox the chilcken to use to walk to school. She asked what Stseet is across from Alvaxado. Associate Plannex Pseisendanz stated that it is Natalie Dxive. Ms. Baluski was concerned with the traffic in the axea. She indicated that the speed litnits aze cuxxendy 25 mph, howevex most cars dxive much fastex. She stated that the streets axe very naxxow, and is concern with the incxeasing traffic. PAGE 16 - PI.ANNING COMMISSION MINLJTES - October 07, 2003 Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz indicated that the 1"1'M was noticed in 2002, and appxoved by the Coimnission. He indicated that the smxctuxe has alxeady been set, and this item tonight was mexely fox discussion of the Design Review. Thexe being no furthex comments, discussion was bzought back to the Coinmission fox comments. Coisuiussionex Uhlxy stated that he was glad to see this coming fonvaxd. He thought as he could xecall, teaffic along Alvaxado was not bxought up dwing the TTM hearing last yeax. He asked Staff if the decoxadve wall would be a block wall ox wrought ~on. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated that at this time Staff was tlyiug to keep this pxoject open, and not insriturionalized. He stated that the slopes would be wxought ~on, to avoid obstructing the view. Vice Chavwoman Matt6ies asked the Staff if lots 4, 5 and 6 wexe two-story homes, or single- stoiy homes. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated that lot 4 is a model home, and would be a two-stoxy. He stated that lots 5& 6 ate single-stories. Vice Chaixwoman Macthies asked about the easement. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz indicated that the easement was outside of the tsacts boundaxies. He indicated that he would norify SCE. Vice Chau~woman Matthies asked if thexe was anothex street acxoss ~om Euxeka Street. She stated that the only othex suggestion would be fox Ms. Baluski to call the County of Rivexside to see what could be done. She stated that the pxoject looks gxeat, and had no fixtthex comments. Coinuiissionex Nash stated that whenevex you have a new Residential pxoject come into the City, no doubt that traffic would incxease. He stated that the pxoject looks good and had no fixxthex comments. Cotmnissionex LaPexe indicated that this pxoject would 'unprove the axea. He concurted with the Commission on the looks of this pxoject. He had no furthex coxnxnents. Chainnan Baxnes xeminded the public that this item is befoxe the Coinmission as a Design Review. He stated that at this time the Coiiuivssion was looking at the axcl~itectuxal xendexings only, as the TTM been appxoved. He had no furthex comments. Thexe being no fuxthex comments, Cha~man Barnes asked for the teading of the Resolurion. PAGE 17 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Octobex 07, 2003 MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-97, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2003-09 FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF FIFTY (50) NEW RESIDENTIAL HOMES AND ASSOCIATE IMPROVEMENTS FOR "ELSINORE HOMES" LOCATED WITHIN TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30670 ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MACHADO STREET, BETWEEN GRAND AVENUE AND LINCOLN STREET, WITHIN AN AREA IDENTIFIED BY THE GENERAL PLAN AS FUTURE SPECIFIC PLAN "P", AND APN 379-030-023 AND 379-030-025. INFORMATIONAL NONE STAFF COMMENTS Communitg Develogment D~ectar Bxady commented on the following: • Noted that the EDC Luncheon would be held on Thuxsday. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chaixman Barnes commented on the followin : • Thanked Staff and Deputy City Attoxnep. Vice Chaiiwoman Mattl~ies commented on the followin : • Thanked the audience & Staff. Coimnissionex Uhlry commented on the follocving • He noted that Staff did an outstanding job, and thanked Staff fox all the haxd woxk. Commissionex Nash commented on the followine• • Thanked Staff, and hoped that everyone had a chance to vote today. Counnissioner LaPexe commented on the followin : • No comments. PAGE 18 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Octobex 07, 2003 ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY NASH SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 8:37 PM. BARNES, CHAIRMAN Respectfully Submitted ,~.~ ~~~~~' Dana C. Poxche' Community Development Clexk ATTEST: ~obext A. Bxady, Secxetary~o the Planning Coinmission * Italicr indicates addirion to text, ~g~t indicates xemoval from text. MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET T•AKF' ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, OCTOBER 21, 2003 The Regulax Planning Commission Meeting was called to ordex at 6:00 PM. by Chauman Bames The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chauinan Baxnes. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, MATTHIES, NASH, LAPERE & UHLRY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Also pxesent wexe: Community Development Dixectox Brady, Plamiiug and Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa, City Engineex O'Donnell, Associate Plannex Millex, Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz, Office Specialist Poxche' and Deputy City Attorney Miles. PUBLIC COMMENTS None CONSENT CALENDAR None PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 2003-13 & Design Review fot Commercial Project No. C 2003-05. Chavtnan Barnes opened the Public Heaxing at 6:01 PM, and xequested the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that the item befoxe the Coixunission is a CUP & Design Review fox a Commercial item, and xequested Associate Plannex Millex to xeview it cvith the Conuzussion. PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -OCTOBER 21, 2003 Associate Plannex Millex indicated this pxoject is a xequest fox a dxive-thru xestauxant to be located at the noxtheastex secrion of the City on Dextex Avenue neax Central Avenue. She stated that the site was appxoved fox a fast food xestauxant (Mc Donald's) on Maxch 3, 1999. She indicated at that time the restauxant sold the pxopexty, due to issues that could not be xesolved. Associate Planner Miller indicated the cuxxent ownex intends on opetating a Tom's Restauxant, which would consist of a 4,721 squaxe foot, single story xesta~ant with a drive-thru facility on a 1- acxe vacant paxcel. She stated the xestauxant would pxovide a drive-tl~u lane with a stacking area fox at least eight vehicles. She noted the aschitectuxal design would be Meditexxanean style. She indicated that the main building would be stucco, with two shades of colox with clay tile xoof in Deleo Buf£ 'The accent tile pillaxs would be gold and olive gxeen. Associate Plannex Millex stated that the CUP was to ensuxe safe and efficient internal cixculation as well at to pxovide sufficient vehicle stacking fox the dxive-thxu window. She noted the CUP complies with the LEMC xequ~ements. Associate Planner Millex stated that she has xeceived sevexal lettets opposing the xestaurant. She indicated the fixst lettex was from Mr. Dino Foutris dated Octobex 1, 2003 the adjacent pxopexty ownex, who owns Douglas B~gex. The lettex discussed the concerns of the divexsity and choices fox the customexs, when it came to appxoving fast food type xesta~ants in the same locarion. He also indicated in the lettex that he thought the City would like to see moxe sit docvn full seivice type of xesta~ants such as a Denny's ox Cocds. Lasdy, 1V~. Fouris pointed out in lvs lettex that the menu of Tom's Restauxant and the Douglas Burgexs Restaurant axe very similax. Associate Plannex Millex indicated the second lettex was from Mx. Fxank Kaunex; 18281 Gaffey Drive, Lake Elsinoxe, CA dated Octobex 21, 2003 opposing the xestauxant due to the potential issues of teaffic, and would like to see a diffexent type of xestai~ant in the City that would offex a moxe divexsified menu. Associate Plannex Millez stated that the thixd letter was from l~Is. Jesse Millis dated Octobex 21, 2003, no address given. His concexns were the same issues that wexe xaised in Mx. Ka.nnex's letter. Lasdy, Associate Plannex Millex stated that she xeceived a lettex dated Octobex 21, 2003, from the Law Firtn of Alhadeff & Solas, LLP, at 434600 Ridge Paxk Dxive, Suite 270, Temecula, CA indicating they aze xepxesenting Iv~. Dino Foutris, the ownexs of Douglas B~gex's. She indicated that the Attomey's has issues with the CC&R's and the architectuxal design. She indicated Staff feels that these issues ase a civil mattex between the two pxopexries, and thexefoxe the Coimnission would only be xeviewing the Design Review this evening. Associate Plannex Millex indicated that Staff Tecommends appxoval of this pxoject based on the Findings, E~chibits, and subject to the Condirions of Appxoval. She indicated that the applicant is pxesent this evening to answex any quesrions the CotiuTUSSion might have. Chaiunan Baxnes xequested comments fxom the Public. Iv~. Tom Bickle, with Bickel Undexwood, 2600 Birch Street, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660 indicated that he would be available fox any questions the Convnission may have. He noted that he PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -OCTOBER 21, 2003 has xead and agreed to all of the Condirions of Approval. He stated he agxeed to Staff's comment on any potenual CR&R issue, and would deal with that issue separately. DimiUios Kaxpouzis, 4885 Green Cxest Dx., Yoxba Linda, CA 92887, stated that he is the owner's son, and would be available to answex any questions that the Coxuinission may have. Dino Foutris, ownex of Douglas Buxgexs at 24570 Ave De Maxcie, Yoxba Linda, CA indicated concems with the ingxess and egzess, potential traffic issues, and would pxefex to have a sit down dinnex house type xestaurant, vexses anothex fast food xesta~ant. Jesse Munoz, 17120 Fay Lane, Lake Elsinare, CA wanted to expxess his concern with anothex fast food xestauxant coming into the same axea. He indicated that he would like to see a diffexent type of xestauxant in the axea. He also expxessed his concerns with the potential teaffic issues. Rogex Eppexson, Gateway Comxnexcial 87, 28046 Del Rio Road, Suite C, Temecula, CA 92590, stated that he is a managing paxmex at Gateway Commercial and wanted to expxess his concerns with the ingxess/egxess. He indicated that a possible solution would be to shift the building fuxthex to the south towaxds the othex e~cit off of Cxane Stxeet, which would allow bettex stacking of the caxs, and having only one commexcial driveway which would handle the applicant, Douglas Burger's and Chevxon. San Alhadeff, 43460 Ridge Paxk Dx. #270, Temecula, CA 92590 wanted to verify that the City had xeceived a lettex dated Octobex 21, from theiu law fi~m and Gateway Commexcial's lettex dated Octobex 21, 2003, and Temecula Inveshnent Company Inc. dated Octobex 21, 2003. He indicated that is CC&R's that govern this pxopexty, the pzoperty in concern. He stated that the CC&R's nw with this pxoject as well as with the Mx. Eppexson's pxopexty. He stated that his fixm xepxesents N~. Foutxis's business. He stated that he wanted to indicate that the CC&R's axe not a sepaxate issue, and should be considexed as part of pxocessing of this pxoject. San Alhadeff pointed out that the CUP, the City's xequirements pex the LEMC xequixe cettani findings be made, howevex he pointed out that thexe wasn't information to support the findings that xelate to whethex the pxoject qualifies as an infill pxoject under CEQA. He also noted that thexe ase no comments from CAL-TRANS. He also noted that witkun 170 feet of frontage along Dextex thexe is appxoxunately five to si~c ingxee/egtess ox cuxb cuts. He suggested that this issue should be looked into. He suggested that the applicant conduct a traffic study about these issues. San Alhadeff xequested to look at Condirion No. 27, which discusses the widening and xadius of Dextex. He suggested looking at the xequixements of the cuxb cuts within the shoxt distance. He also wanted to bring up Conditions No. 36, 43, and 44 that discuss dxainage and othex issue xelated to CAL-TRANS. Lasdy, he menrioned that Staff neglected to include into the Condirions of Appxoval the TUMF Fees. He indicated that tlvs pxoject should be subjected to those fees. He stated that he would be available to answex any quesrions that the Coixuzussion might have. Jacoba Caballexo, 28570 Rostrata St. stated that she and hex husband eat out ~equendy in the City of Lake Elsinoxe, and would like to see less fast food xesta~ants, and moxe full seroice type xesta~ants. PAGE 4- PLANNING CONLMISSION MINUTES -OCTOBER 21, 2003 Manuel Caballexo, 28570 Rostsata St, stated that txaffic would be an issue with the pxoposed Costco coming into the azea and a new fast food xestauxant. Chauman Baxnes asked fox fi~thex comments from the Public. Thexe being no fuxthex comments, Chaurnan Barnes bxought the discussion back to the Coixunission for comments. Cominissionex Uh1ty indicated that he too noriced that TUMF Fees wexe not mentioned in the Conditions. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated the TUMF Fees fox Commexcial Pxojects would not take effect until next yeax. Conunissionex Uhlry asked about the vacant Allen Street, and is a xight-of-way dedicated fox CAL- TRANS to use Cxane Sueet. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that CAL-T'RANS axe suppose to use Cxane Stxeet, and the street belund the development. Convnissionex Uhhy stated that the big txucks axe cuxxendy using the stteet to paxk while eating at Douglas B~gers. He stated that some of the traffic pxoblems axe cxeated fxom the big trucks using Allen S~eet, instead of Crane Stseet. He indicated that the High School has also attributed the traffic in the axea. He indicated that the applicant has met all of the xequixements, and the CC&R's axe out of the Coinmission's hands. He had no fiixthex comments. Deputy City Attomey Miles stated that the CC&R's axe essential fox measuxes and pxotecting fox common ownexship. He stated that it would be appxopxiate fox the Coimnission to have the applicant comply with the CC&R's. He stated that otherwise it would just be a batde. He stated that he has not had a chance to xeview them, but would do so as soon as he could. Coininissionex Nash stated that the applicant has met all of the xequixements pex the Genexal Plan. He asked the Deputy City Attomey Miles if it a Mirigated Negative Declaxation would be necessary. Deputy City Attorney Miles stated that a Mirigated Negarive Declaxation would not be applicable to this pxoject. Couiinissionex Nash stated he does not see any majox envixonmental unpacts that would be necessary fox the applicant to file a Mitigated Negarive Declasarion. He indicated that laxge xestauxants would eventually come into the City. He noted that with any business in the City, you would have comperition. He stated this pxoject has been scheduled to go befoxe the City Council and Staff is woxking haxd with the applicant. He had no futdzex comments. Coimnissionex LaPexe stated that traffic along Dextex would continue to be an issue. He stated that unfoxtunately, the traffic fxom the High School does not help the mattex; howevex, the City doesn't have a say-so whexe the School Distxict places a school. He stated that teaffic moxe than ]ikely would get woxse when Costco is developed. Howevex, he indicated that complerion is good. He had no fi~thex comments. PAGE 5- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -OCTOBER 21, 2003 Vice Chaiiwoman Matthies concurxed with the Coxxunission. She stated to the Public that good service is what keeps customexs comuig back. She stated that hex family has a business in the City fox a long time, and knows that customexs could shop elsewhexe, howevez it is the good sen*ice that theix business offexs, that keeps the customexs xetuxning. She asked Staff if CAL-'IRt1NS has zeceived a copy of the plans, and has Staff xeceived a xesponse. Associate Plannex Millex indicated that CAL. TRANS were sent a copy of the plans, howevex, she has not heaxd from them yet. She stated that when she xeturns to the office, she would send them anothex set of plans to xespond. She stated that she could also add a Condition that would ad~ess CALrTRANS. Vice Chairwoman MattUies stated that the Coimnission cannot comment on the civil case, and indicated that she hopes evexytUing would be xesolved. She had no fuxthex comments. Chairman Barnes stated that the pxoject is in confoxmance with CEQA. He stated that he has not had the chance to xeview the materials that were placed befoxe him tonight. Cha.vuian Baznes motioned that the item be continued to the next Pluining Commission Meeting. Chavinan Barnes indicated that hearing no second, morion dies fox lack of a second. Coimnissionex Uhlry stated that this item has alxeady been continued. He agxeed that the Commission should have had moxe time to xead the matexial, howevex xecommended to vote on it tonight. He pointed out that Condirion No. 26 discusses CAL-TRANS alxeady. Deputy Attomey City Miles stated that the City could accept the lettexs in the Public comments and continue to move foxcvaxd without them having been xead. Cha~man Basnes asked Deputy Attomey City Miles to clarify that the documents that wexe handed out tlus evening do not have to be xead, in oxdex to make a decision this evening. Deputy Attorney City Miles stated "yes: ' Chaitman Barnes asked the Cotninission if they concuxxed. The Coxsunission concurzed. Thexe being no fiudiex comments, Chaixman Barnes closed the Public Hearing at 6:50 PM, and xequested the xeading of the Resolurion. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY 4 TO 1 VOTE WITH CHAIRMAN BARNES OPPOSING THE VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003- 98, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 2003-13 FOR A DRIVE-THRU LANE FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECT NO. 2003-05 TO BE PAGE 6- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -OCTOBER 21, 2003 LOCATED AT DEXTER AVENUE - APN 377-030-071 TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY 4 TO 1 VOTE WITH CHAIRMAN BARNES OPPOSING THE VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-99, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF DESIGN REVIEW FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECT NO. C 2003-05, TO BE LOCATED AT DEXTER AVENUE APN 377-030-071 TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. 3. Minor Design Review of a Duplex located (~a,105 South Scrivener Street. Chairman Baxnes indicated that this is a Business item and xequested the xeading of the Staff Report. Community Development D~ector Bxady stated that the pxoject befoxe the Planning Coinmission is fox a 1bIDR of a Single Family home, and xequested Associate Plannex Pzeisendanz to xeview it with the Coimivssion. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated the xequest is fox two-story detached duplex and associated impxovements located at 105 South Scrivener Stxeet. He stated the duplex is intended to be the applicant's primary xesidence. He indicated that the project would include a detached duplex consisting of two attached single-family dwelling units, on detached gaxage, guest parking, and pxivate yasds. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated each unit would consist of 1,320 squaxe feet and would include tl~ee bedxooms, a living zoom, a kitchen, and two bathxooms. He indicated the applicant was pxoposing to develop the .18-acre site cvith a two story convenrionally built duplex, which would include a detached two-cat gaxage and would consist of a downsta~s bad~oom and a second story dedicated fox stoxage only. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated that the applicant would develop the site with 4,138 squaxe feet of landscaping. The coloxs and materials for both duplexes and gaxage would be painted light gxay with the wood txim, poxch xailing, battexed columns, e~osed xaftex tails, and louvexed vents painted ivory white. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated that Staff xecommends appxoval of the pxoject based on the Findings, E~chibits, and subject to the Condirions of Appxoval. He indicated the applicant could not attend tonight's meeting. He also stated that on page 3 of 19, undeT the paxagxaph that discusses Landscaping, the sentence was not complete. He had no fixxthex comments. Chaixtnan Barnes xequested comments from the Public. Heaxing no comments fxom the public, discussion was bxought back to the Coininission fot comments. PAGE 7- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -OCTOBER 21, 2003 Cotmnissionex Nash asked Staff why the applicant is pxoposing a bathxoom in the gaxage. He indicated that it would be very easy fox the applicant to convext the gasage into a bedxoom, and thexefoxe would not xecommend the bad~oom in the gaxage. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated tl~is was also a concem of his as well. Coxsunissionex Nash had no fuxther comments. Coimuissionex LaPexe concuxsed with Coimzussionex Nash with the xemoval of the batl~oom in the gaxage. Vice Chaixwoman Matthies asked if the Conuvission would allow just a showex and sink. Coinmissionex Nash stated that it could still tuxn out to be a pTOblem. Commissionex Uhlry conc~xed with the Coiiuvission, and suggested just a washbasin, with no showex ox toIlet. Associate Plannex Pxeisendanz stated the applicant xeally would like to get pxoject approved tonight, and would do anything to include xemoving the batl~oom fxom the gazage. Chaixman Bames stated that who evex dxew up the plans foxgot to include the dining area, and added a very small kitchen. He also noted that the plans do not show any aix-conditionex ox central heating. Associate Planner Pxeisendanz indicated that the applicant's husband dxew up the plans and would be able to make the minar coxxections. He stated that he would discuss the plans with the applicant fixst thing in the moxning, and have the corsecrions made to include deleting the bathtoom from the gasage and have a Condirion added to addxess this issue. Thexe being no fiuthex comments fxom the Coimnission, Chaiunan Barnes xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-100, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR THE NEW RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX AN ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS, FOR DANG THI DESROCHERS, TO BE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SCRIVENER STREET BETWEEN GRAHAM STREET AND LAKESHORE DRIVE WITHIN THE "HISTOffiC ELSINORE" OVERLAY DISTRICT AND APN 374-231-011 TO INCLUDE THE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS. PAGE 8- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -OCTOBER 21, 2003 INFORMATIONAL ITEMS NONE STAFF COMMENTS Community Development D~ectoT Bxady commented on the following • He wanted to xemind the Conuivssion of the State of the City Bxeakfast at the Diamond Stadium tomoTxow morning at 7:30 A.M. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chaitinan Bames comtnented on the followiue: • He wanted to expxess to Staff that we all woxk well togethex as a team, wanted to thank Staff, and to the Deputy City Attorney fox all the haxd woxk on the pxojects pxesented tonight. Vice Chavwoman Matthies commented on the followine: • She thanked Staff fox all of the good woxk on the pxojects. Commissionex Nash commented on the followinQ: • Thanked Staff Coimzussionex LaPexe commented on the followin¢: • Thanked Staff Coininissionex Uhlry commented on the followins~ • He indicated that he has been asked many quesrions xegarding the new upcoming Costco and asked Community Development Dixectox Bxady if he had any new infomaarion. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated tomoxxow morning a special meeting at the City Hall to discuss the Design and Financial aspect of the pzoject. He indicated that at this time, the pxoject is a"Pxeliuiinary Design Review", and possibly next month the developex would be submitting a TPM. Couniussionex Uhiry had no fuxtheT comments. PAGE 9- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -OCTOBER 21, 2003 ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY NASH SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 7:15 PM. JOHN BARNES, CHAIRMAN Respectfully Submitted, ~~ (' /~~~ Dana C. Poxche' Office Specialist III ATTEST: MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET T.AKF: ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 04, 2003 The Regulax Planning Comnussion Meeting was called to oxder at 6:00 PM. by Chaixman Barnes The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chaixtnan Baxnes. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, MATTHIES, NASH, LAPERE & UHLRY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Also present were: Cotnmunity Development Directox Bxady, Plamiuig and Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa, City Engineex O'Donnell, Seniox Plannex Morita, Community Development Technician Hennings, Office Specialist Poxche' and Deputy City Attomey Miles. PUBLIC COMMENTS None CONSENT CALENDAR 1a Minutes of Planning Coimiussion Meeting - Septembex 16, 2003 lb Minutes of Planning Coimnission Meeting - Octobex 07, 2003 Community Development Duectox Bxady stated xegaxding the Octobex 7, 2003 Planning Cominission Minutes, on page 10 of 18, Resolurion No. 2003-93 pextaining to the Lakeshoxe Village Specific Plan was missing. MOVED BY NASH SECONDED BY LAPERE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 07, 2003 MINUTES WITH THE MENTIONED CORRECTIONS. PAGE 2- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -NOVEMBER 04, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. 28214 and 30836, and Addendum No. 2 to the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Repoxt. Cha~tnan Basnes opened the Public Hearing at 6:01 PM, and xequested the Staff Report. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that the item befare the Coimnission is a xequest fox appxoval of Vesting Tentarive Tract Map No. 28214, Vesting Tentarive Txact Map No. 30836, and Addendutn No. 2 to the Albexhill Ranch Specific Plan Final EIR. He stated that the applicant has met with the Staff and was able to modify a few Condirions, and xequested Seniox Plannex Moxita to xeview it with the Coinwission. Seniox Planner Moxita stated the Albexhill Ranch Specific Plan (SP) was oxiginally appxoved in 1989, which at that time was owned by Long Beach Equiries, Brighton Homes and pxesendy by M~dock Development. He stated that the applicant is pxoposing a xnixed-use development to include Community Paxk, xesidential, open spaces, and school facilities. Seniox Plaunex Morita stated that TTM 28214 is appxoximately 392 acxes of Muxdock Albethill Ranch Specific Plan axea. He indicated that the pxoposed featuxes and unpxovements would include 970 single-family detached xesidenrial lots, multi-family xesidenrial units, commexcial ox multi-family xesidential units, park; xecxeational facilities open spaces, and a watex tank. Seniox Plannex Mo~ta stated that '17'M 30836 would allow 208 single-family detached xesidential lots, a school site and public paxk, a p~vate pazk and HOA-maintained slopes and open spaces. Seniox Plannex Morita stated that Staff supports the two Vesting Txact Maps and recommends appxoval based on the Development Standasds, Findings, Exhibits, and subject to the Conditions of Appxoval. Seniox Plannex Morita stated that he received a lettex fxom Geoxge J. Kolibex, which he should be entered into the Public Recoxd. He indicated the letter expxessed suppoxt fox the pxoject. Chaiunan Baxnes xequested comments fxom the Public Jim Siinmons, Bakex Steeet, Lake Elsinoze, asked the Coiiunission and Staff "Whexe will all of the xun off watex go." He also asked if the pxoject is expected to increase txaffic, and would Bakex Street be used as a shoxt cut. Thexe being no fuxthex comments, Chainnan Barnes bxought the discussion back to the Comxnission fox comtnents. Commissionex Uhhy asked claxificarion on Condirion No. 12. Seniox Plannex Morita stated that tonight's EIR is a Dxaft document, and the City Attorney would be addtessing the conunents pxiox to going befote City CouncIl. PAGE 3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -NOVEMBER 04, 2003 Commissionex Uhky asked should a xevision be made to the EIR, what then would happen Seniox Plannex Morita stated should an issue arise, and it is significant enough, then Staff would bring it back to the Conuzussion for discussion. Coxmnissionex Uhlry stated this is something that should be addxessed, and stated that should any majox changes occux, he would like to see it come back to the Coimivssion pxiox to the City Council. City Deputy Attorney Miles stated that it might come back to the Coinmission. Howevex, he indicated that Staff should try to first woxk with the applicant on any issues. Coimiussionex Uhlxy stated that if the T[JMF wexe applicable, then he would like to see them ad~essed in the Conditions. He also addressed Condition No. 50 and noted that the landscape median on Lake Steeet has been xeduced from 24 feet to 14 feet. He asked City Engineex O'Donnell to clarify. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that it was due to maintenance costs, and possible sight distance pxoblems. Coimivssionex Uhlxy asked about the access to the Axco Starion. He stated that it is a steep kull and Staff might want to look into the realigmnent of Colliex. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that the woxding of Condirion No. 103 undex Engineexing poxdon has been modified to reflect xealigmnent. Staff will woxk with all of the e~sting businesses. Cominissionex Uhhy asked Staff if the TUMF Fees would apply to both TTM'S. Community Development Dixectox Bxady indicated that the TUMF Fees are not applicable on eithex Txact Map as the pxoject was vested as past of the Development Agteement. Conunissioner Uhlry had no fuxthex comments. Vice Chau~cvoman Matthies asked City Engineex O'Donnell to addxess Mx. Siimnons concerns with the drainage on Bakex Stxeet. City Engineex O'Donnell stated that a storm dxain would be put in, and the City would be conducting unpxovements to Nichols and Lake Steeest, and hopefully impxove the dxainage issue on Bakex Street. Vice Chaixwoman MattUies had no fuxthet comments. Cointnissioner Nash stated that the keys to tl~is pxoject would be the unprovements to Nichols, Mountain, and Lake Streets. He stated that he likes the look of the layout and had no fuxthex comments. Coimnissionex LaPexe asked City Engineex O'Donnell if the two TTM's had any paxriculax issues that the Couiinission should know about. PAGE 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -NOVEMBER 04, 2003 City Engineex O'Donnell stated that all issues had been discussed with the applicant, and the appxop~ate changes have been made. He stated that an example would be Condirion No. 103, undex the Phase I impxovements, which was been changed from 100th C of O to 240th C of O. Cotnmissioner LaPexe asked City Engineex O'Donnell the putpose of the impxovements. City Engineex O'Donnell indicated that the purpose was fox the applicant, Nexus, and the financial buxden. He stated that the pxoject would flow bettex by changing these Condirions. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated the impxovements would need to be completed priox construction. Commissionet LaPexe had no fucthex comments. Cha.unian Barnes xequested Mx. Bigelow to appxoach the podium. Mx. Bigelow asked if he agxeed to the Condirions of Appxoval and all of the modifications. l~ Bigelow indicated "yes." Cotnmissionex Uhlxy stated to Mx. Suzunons that he knows whexe Bakex Stxeet is, and with all of the impxovements made, access should be easiex. Mx. Sinunons indicated that Bakex Steeet is cu~endy 55 MPH and many accidents axe in the axea. He suggested to the Coiiunission to have the MPH lowexed, and the condirion of the road needs to be impxoved. Coimnissionex Uhlxy stated that he is very awase of the situarion, and the City would be making the ixnpiovements. He had no futther comments. There being no fuxthex comments, Chainnan Barnes closed the Public Hearing at 6:25 PM, and requested the xeading of the Resolurion. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-101, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE ELSINORE CERTIFICATION OF ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO FINAL ALBERHILL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY LAPERE AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-102, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAl' NO. 28214 WHICH SUBDIVIDES 392 ACRES OF THE MURDOCK ALBERHILL RANCH SPECIFIC PAGE 5- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -NOVEMBER 04, 2003 PLAN AREA INTO 1,018 TOTAL LOTS TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-103, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30836 WHICH SUBDIVIDES 108 ACRES OF THE MURDOCK ALBERHILL RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AREA INTO 219 LOTS TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. BUSINESS ITEMS 3. Minoc Design Review of three single family residences to be located at 309 Mohx Stceet, 310 Mohr Stceet. and 407 Langstaff Stceet. Chairman Barnes indicated that this is a Business item and xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady stated that the pxoject befoxe the Plamiuig Conmvssion is fox a MDR of tl~ee Single Family homes, and xequested Community Development Technician Hennuigs to xeview it with the Conunission. Community Development Technician Henniugs indicated the tequest is fox an appxoval fox fl~ee manufactuxed homes with detached gaxages. She stated two of the pxopexties aze located at 309 Mol~ Street and 310 Moht Street, between SLUnner Avenue and Pottery. She indicated that the thixd pxopexty is located at 407 Langstaff Avenue, between Pottery Street and Flint Street. She stated that all thxee sites ase within the Historical Overlay District. Community Development Technician Hennings stated the applicant is pxoposing to place a 1,493 squaxe foot manufactuxed home with a 440 squaxe foot detached gaxage on each of these lots. She stated that each home would have a full poxch, and a bxeezeway between each home and the gaxage. She indicated that the homes would be stucco with cobblestone accents and txeatments with all windows. Community Development Technician Hennings stated the pxoject meets all of the LEMC and therefoie Staff xecommends appxoval, based on the Findings, Exhibits, and is subject to the Condirions of Appxoval. She indicated the applicant is pxesent this evening to answex any quesrions that the Cominission may have. Chauman Bames xequested cotnments from the public. Thexe being no comments from the public, discussion was bxought back to the Couiinission fox comments. Chautnan Barnes had no comments. PAGE 6- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -NOVEMBER 04, 2003 Cominissionex Nash had no comments. Vice Chaircvoman Matthies stated that the home looks gteat, and had no fuxthex comments. CoxmTUSSionex Uhlxy had no f~thex comments. Commissionex LaPexe had no comments. Thexe being no fixxthex comments, Chaiiman Baxnes xequested the xeading of the Resolution. Thexe being no fuxthex comments from the Coimnission, Chautnan Barnes xequested the xeading of the Resolurion. MOVED BY MATTHIES SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-104, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF THREE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES TO BE LOCATED AT 309, MOHR STREET, 310 MOHR STREET, AND 407 LANGSTAFF STREET. 4. Minor Design Review of a Single Familv Residence located at 16373 Amold Avenue. Chairnzan Barnes indicated this is a Business item, and xequested Community Development Duectox Bxady fox the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Director Bxady indicated this is a xequest fox a Minor Design Review of a Single Family Home, and tequested Community Development Technician Hennings to xeview it with the Coimnission. Community Development Technician Hennings stated this pxoject had been pxesented befare the CoimTUSSion and was voted to deny without pxejudice. She indicated that the home was veiy plain, and specifically had no poxch. She noted that she met with the applicant and the applicant has xevised the plan by adding additional axchitectuxal elements. Community Development Technician Heiuiuigs stated that the home is a 1,026 squaxe foot manufactuxed home with a 400 square foot attached garage to be located in the Country Club Heights axea. She stated the applicant has added horizontal siding and fxont poxch, which gxeady unpxoves the design of the home. She also indicated the applicant unpxoved the quality of the pxoposed fxontyaxdlandscaping. Community Development Technician Hennings indicated that Staff xecommends the Planning Commission adopt a Resolurion based on the Findings, E~ibits, and subject to the Condirions of Appxoval. She indicated the applicant is pxesent this evening to answex any quesrions the Commission might have. PAGE 7- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -NOVEMBER 04, 2003 Cha~man Bames xequested comments fsom the public. There beiug no comments from the public, discussion was bxought back to the Cominission fox comments. Coxrunissionex Uhlry asked Staff if Exhibit "A" was a pict~e of the xevised plans. Community Development Technician Hennings indicated "yes." Couuivssionex Uhhy indicated that he appxeciated the impxovements, and had no furdiex cotnxnents. Vice Chaiuwoman Matthies concurxed with Commissionex Uh1ty and had no fuxthex comments. Conunissionex Nash concuxxed with the Couiinission, and had no comments. Commissionex LaPexe had no cotnments. Chavinan Barnes xequested the applicant to appxoach the podiuxn. He asked the applicant if he agxeed to the Conditions of Appxoval as written. Vince Bindi, KVM Pxopexties, 25922 Via Val Vexde, Laguna Niguel stated "yes", he agxeed to the Conditions of Appxoval as written. Thexe being no fi~thex comments, Cha~man Bames xequested the xeading of the Resolution. MOVED BY MATTHIES SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-105, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 16373 ARNOLD AVENUE (APN 378-212-027) 5. Minor Design Review of a Single Family Residence located at 29320 Hague Cha~man Bames xequested the xeading of the Staff Repoxt. Community Development Dixectox Bxady xequested the Cointnission to have this pxoject tabled, since the applicant was not able to meet the deadline. MOVED BY NASH SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO HAVE THIS ITEM TABLED AND BROUGHT BACK AT A LATER DATE. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Vice Chauwoman Matthies advised the Conunission and Staff that the Unity in the Community PAGE 8- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -NOVEMBER 04, 2003 Parade would be held Satuxday, Novembex 15, 2003 in Downtown Lake Elsinoxe, which is paxt of the CAP (Community Action Pxo~am). STAFF COMMENTS Community Development Directox Bxady commented on the following~ • He wanted to xemind everyone the City's SK run would be held on Novembex 22. • He indicated that the City Council Meeting of Novembex 11, 2003 was cancelled due to Vetexan Day Holiday. He indicated the next City Council Meeting would be held on Novembex 25, 2003. • He noted that on Decembex 1, the new City Council membexs would be swoxn in. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS A Mouon was made by Vice Chaixwoman Matthies, Seconded by Coinmissionex Uhlxy and passed by unanimous vote to have the Ultra-Max Gas Starion and the FCI bxought back to the Planning Commission Meeting fox the Novembex 18, 2003 as an Informarional Item. Planning & Code Enfoxcement Managex Villa indicated that he has scheduled a meeting cvith the ownex of Ultea-Max Gas Station to take place next week, and would discuss the pxoject at the Novembex 18, 2003 Planning Commission Meeting. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY MATTHIES SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 6:57 PM. JOHN BARNES, CHAIRMAN Respectfully Submitted, ~~. ~ ~~ Dana C. Poxche' Office Specialist III ATTEST: PAGE 9- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -NOVEMBER 04, 2003 U obext A. Brady, Secx tary to the Planning Cominissio MINUTES - I PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 The Regular Planning Commission Meeting was called to order at 5:59 PM. by Chairman Barnes. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Barnes. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, NASH, AND MATTHIES ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: UHLRY & LAPERE Also present were: Community Development Director Brady, Planning Manager Villa, Associate Planner Preisendanz, City Engineer O'Donnell, and Office Specialist Porche' PUBLIC COMMENTS NONE CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR. Minutes la. October 21,2003 lb. November 04, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS None PAGE 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - NOVEMBER 18, 2003 BUSINESS ITEMS 2. Minor Design Review of a Single Family Residence located at 16350 Stevens Street. Assessor parcel Numbers 378-221-004. 005.006 and 007. Chairman Barnes indicated this is a Business Item and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Community Development Director Brady stated this was a request for a Design Review of a Single Family manufactured home and requested Associate Planner Preisendanz to review it with the Commission. Associate Planner Preisendanz indicated that the applicant was requesting approval for a 1,795 square foot manufactured dwelling to be located at 16350 Stevens Street to include a 46 square foot porch on four existing lots, which would be merged into one lot. He stated that the architectural design of the proposed development would be a combination of both Craftsman and Bungalow residential design. He indicated that the home would have horizontal siding, and roof planes, with Oak Ridge Sierra shingles. Associate Planner Preisendanz stated that the project meets all the requirements of the LEMC, and deemed exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. He stated that he recommends approval of the project based on the Findings, Exhibits, and subjected to the Conditions of Approval Chairman Barnes requested comments from the Public. There being no further comments, discussion was brought back to the Commission. Commissioner Nash indicated that he liked the design of the home, and had no further comments. Vice Chairwoman Matthies asked City Engineer O'Donnell if there were any grading issues. City Engineer O'Donnell stated no. Vice Chairwoman Matthies had no further comments. Chairman Barnes has no comments. There being no further comments, Chairman Barnes requested the reading of the Resolution. MOVED BY NASH, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-106, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 16350 STEVENS STREET, APN NO. 378-221-004,005,006 AND 007. PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - NOVEMBER 18,2003 INFORMATIONAL ITEMS . Design Review for the Ultra Mar Gas Station/Mini Mart. Community Development Director Brady indicated the Ultra-Mar Gas Station/Mini Mart CUP had expired and requested Planning and Code Enforcement Manager Villa to go over some of the issues that were brought up at a meeting that took place last week with the applicant. Planning & Code Enforcement Manager Villa indicated that he met with the applicant last week and discussed the CUP and Design Review and indicated to the applicant that the permits had expired. He explained to the Commission the purpose for the CUP was for the off-site sale of alcohol. He indicated that the applicant lost both permits, yet the applicant is still interested in obtaining more property to possibly expand the business. He indicated that the applicant should be resubmitting an application sometime next January or February of 2004. Community Development Director Brady also indicated that there were some Code Enforcement issues as well that needed to be looked into. . CUP No. 2001-01 for FCI Constructors, Inc. Community Development Director Brady indicated this item was placed under the Informational Items per the request of Commissioner LaPere. However, he indicated that Commissioner LaPere could not attend tonight's meeting therefore; he was going to go over the issue briefly. He stated that CUP for FCI was issued for the use of storage for a major construction company. He indicated that half of the property is in the flood way, so it is not buildable. He stated that Staff has met with the developer and the applicant has not landscaped the wall per the Conditions of Approval. Community Development Director Brady stated that Near-Cal is working out a deal with the applicant to resolve some of the issues regarding landscaping. He also indicated that Code Enforcement is making sure that the applicant complies with the codes. STAFF COMMENTS Community Development Director Brady commented on the following: . He apologized for venting his frustration at the last Planning Commission Meeting of November 04, 2003. . He wished everyone a safe and happy Thanksgiving. PAGE 4 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - NOVEMBER 18, 2003 Planning & Code Enforcement Manager Villa commented on the following: . He advised the Commission that unfortunately, Associate Planner Linda Miller's husband lost his battle with cancer, and passed away on Saturday, November 15, 2003. He stated that Staff is very concerned for Linda, and hopes that she is coping with this tragedy, and that all her friends at work are in their thoughts and prayers. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chairman Barnes commented on the following: . He wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving. Commissioner Nash commented on the following: . No comments. Vice Chairwoman Matthies commented on the following: . She wished everyone a great Thanksgiving. . She wanted to remind everyone of the 5k Run/Walk coming up on Saturday November 22, and hoped everyone could join. . She stated the Unity in the Community Parade was a great success. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY NASH SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 6:15 PM. Respectfully Submitted, J a~({;G C !lwc1J / Dana C. Porche' Community Development Clerk III PAGE 5 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - NOVEMBER 18, 2003 - ATTEST: MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, DECEMBER 02, 2003 The Regular Planning Commission Meeting was called to order at 6:00 PM. by Chairman Barnes. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Community Development Director Brady. ROLLCALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, MATTHIES, LAPERE, & UHLRY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NASH Also present were: Community Development Director Brady, Associate Planner Preisendanz, City Engineer O'Donnell, and Rental Housing Clerk Gibbons. PUBLIC COMMENTS NONE CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR. Minutes la. November 18, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS None PAGE 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 02, 2003 BUSINESS ITEMS 2. Minor Design Review of a Single Family Residence located at 4091 Crestview Drive, APN 379-300-017. Chairman Barnes indicated this is a Business Item and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Community Development Director Brady stated that this was a request for a Design Review of a Single Family home and requested Associate Planner Preisendanz to review it with the Commission. Associate Planner Preisendanz indicated that this Minor Design Review is for a 2,756 square foot single-story custom designed home with an attached 1,190 square foot garage. He indicated that the property is zoned R-1 as Medium Density Residential. He stated that the building would occupy approximately 20% of the lot area. Associate Planner Preisendanz stated that the architectural design of the home is a French Eclectic style. He stated that the applicant would be adding two half-hexagon towers to be located at each corner of the front elevation. He stated that rooflines proposed included tall peaked hip, gable, and hexagon conical roofs. Associate Planner Preisendanz stated that the applicant would provide front yard landscaping with automatic sprinkler system, and the rear yard fencing would be a standard six-foot wood fence or other fencing material per approval by the Community Development Director. Associate Planner Preisendanz stated that this project meets all of the LEMC, and recommends approval based on the Findings, Exhibits, and subject to the Conditions of Approval. He stated that the applicant was not able to attend the meeting. There being no comments from the Public, Chairman Barnes requested comments from the Commission. Commission LaPere stated that the home is extremely well put together. He asked Staff to clarify the third bathroom off the garage. Associate Planner Preisendanz stated that the applicant enjoys using off-road vehicles, and indicated that the applicant would rather have a bathroom near the garage, rather than walking through the home. Commissioner LaPere had no further comments. Commissioner Uhlry concurred with Commission LaPere's comments, and had no questions for Staff. Vice Chairwoman Matthies concurred, and had no comments. Chairman Barnes also concurred. He stated that this is a good infill project. PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 02,2003 There being no further comments, Chairman Barnes requested the reading of the Resolution. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-107, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 4091 CRESTVIEW DRIVE, APN NO. 379-300-017. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS None STAFF COMMENTS Community Development Director Brady commented on the following: . He indicated that the new City Council members were sworn in on December 1, 2003. He stated that Thomas Buckley was appointed as the new Mayor, and Genie Kelley as the new Mayor Pro Tem. He stated that Daryl Hickman was selected as the Redevelopment Chairman and Peter Weber was sworn in as the new City Treasurer. . He reminded the Commission that the City's Winterfest would be held on December 5 beginning at 5:00 PM. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chairman Barnes commented on the following: . He wanted to congratulate all the new members of the City Council, and thanked Pam Brinley for all of her years of hard work for the City. Commissioner LaPere commented on the following: · He wanted to thank Staff again for all of the hard work that they do to prepare for the Commission Meetings. . He also wished the new City Council Members a successful year. · He express to Staff and Commission that his prayers are for Community Development Technician Hennings and her family as well as Associate Planner Miller's family. Vice Chairwoman Matthies commented on the following: · She wanted to thank Staff for all the help with getting the electricity turned back on near the Banana Boat Industrial Office. PAGE 4 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 02, 2003 Commission Uhlry commented on the following: . He wanted to congratulate Bob Magee on becoming a new Council Member and wanted to wish the City Council Members a successful year. . He also wanted to express his condolences to Associate Planner Miller, for the recent passing of her husband. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY LAPERE SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 6:07 PM. Respectfully Submitted, ~QWJ- C. Y (Ot'(CG.' Dana C. Porche' Office Specialist III ATTEST: MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2003 The Regular Planning Commission Meeting was called to order at 6:00 PM. by Chairman Barnes. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner LaPere. ROLLCALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, MATTHIES, LAPERE, & UHLRY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Also present were: Community Development Director Brady, Planning & Code Enforcement Manager Villa, City Engineer O'Donnell, Associate Planner Preisendanz, Associate Planner Miller, and Office Specialist III Porche'. PUBLIC COMMENTS NONE ANNUAL REORGANIZATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION la. Selection of the Chairman lb. Selection of the Vice Chairman Chairman Barnes declared the Planning Commission Chairman position open and asked for nominations. Vice Chairwoman Matthies nominated Commissioner LaPere. Commissioner Uhlry seconded the nomination. There being no other nomination, Chairman Barnes closed the nominations for Chairman. Chairman Barnes declared the Planning Commission Vice Chairman position open and asked for nominations. Vice Chairwoman Matthies nominated Commissioner Uhlry. Chairman Barnes seconded the nomination. There being no other nominations, Chairman Barnes closed the nominations for Vice Chairman. MOVED BY MATTHIES, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO NOMINATE COMMISSIONER LAPERE AS THE PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN. PAGE 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 16, 2003 MOVED BY MATTHIES, SECONDED BY BARNES, AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO NOMINATE COMMISSIONER UHLRY AS THE PLANNING COMMISSION VICE CHAIRMAN. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY BARNES, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR. Minutes 2. December 2, 2003 PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. Conditional Use Permit No. 2003-18, and Industrial Project No. 2003-01. Pasadena Park II. Chairman LaPere opened the Public Hearing at 6:02, and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Community Development Director Brady indicated that the item before the Commission is a request for a CUP and Industrial project, and requested Planning & Code Enforcement Manager Villa to review it with the Commission. Planning & Code Enforcement Manager Villa indicated that Triple "J" Development is requesting approval for the establishment of an outdoor storage area and a Design Review of a Industrial building to be located at the southeast comer of Pasadena Street and Crane Street. He stated that the proposed project entails the construction of 15 separate freestanding buildings and would total approximately 104,100 square feet of lease-able industrial space. He indicated that the industrial park facility would provide 277 parking space and 61,250 square feet of landscaping, loading zones for each unit, and 24 trash enclosures. Planning & Code Enforcement Manager Villa stated that the proposed facility's architectural design is consistent wit the business/industrial park theme. He indicated that the buildings include varying exterior materials and colors such as metal roofing and glazing, varying colors and building heights. He stated that the project complies with the LEMC, and therefore Staff recommends adopting a Resolution based on the Findings, Exhibits and is subject to the Conditions of Approval. He stated that the applicant was available to answer any questions that the Commission may have. Chairman LaPere requested comments from the Public. PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 16, 2003 Carl Johnson, 512 Chaney Street, Lake Elsinore, CA indicated that he has issues with Condition No. 44, which discusses that the developer shall construct half-street improvements on Third Street. He stated that he has issues with this Condition because it is not next to his project, and the other industrial building, which he believes, is F oamworks did not have to put in the half street. Chairman LaPere asked if anyone else wished to speak for or against the project. Patrick Crask, Madison Engineering 109 N. Maple Street, Corona, CA indicated that he is the Engineering Consultant for the applicant. He concurred with Mr. Johnson that the only issue to the Conditions of Approval were Condition No. 44. Chairman LaPere requested any further comments from the Public. There being no further comments, discussion was brought back to the Commission for comments. Commissioner Barnes asked City Engineer O'Donnell if Condition No. 44 was an error. City Engineer O'Donnell indicated that Condition No. 44 was not an error, as the Parcel Map that was in discussion was northeast of the site between their boundaries to Collier Avenue. He indicated that the applicant is conditioned to improve Third Street, and have signed a Development Agreement through their Parcel Map. He indicated that they have bonded Third Street, and made an agreement to improve Third Street with the development of parcel three and five, in phases. He also indicated that that other developer (Foamworks) has also agreed to improve Third Street, so it will be completed. Commissioner Barnes had no further comments. Commissioner Matthies asked City Engineer O'Donnell that Foamworks has agreed to do their share on the improvements to Third Street. City Engineer O'Donnell indicated "yes." Commissioner Matthies asked City Engineer O'Donnell that Foamworks also agreed to have this completed during the next phase. City Engineer O'Donnell stated that it was the intention of the Riverside County Flood Control that they would put in the construction of the channel, which would save the developers a large sum of money. Mr. Johnson stated that he still disagrees with the City Engineer, as he feels that it is not next to his property, but on the other side of the channel. He indicated that this would cost him about $75,000 and would be difficult to make this work. He had no further comments. Vice Chairman Uhlry wanted clarification on the time lines. He asked that if Condition No. 44 remains and the applicant completes his portion of the improvements to Third Street, then would Foamworks be required to complete their portion of the improvements at the same time. PAGE 4 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 16,2003 City Engineer O'Donnell indicated that Foamworks would complete the improvements to Third Street when they are working on parcel three, which is the parcel that fronts Collier. Vice Chairman Uhlry stated that he has concerns that the applicant would complete their portion of the street, and then the remaining portion of the street would not be improved. City Engineer O'Donnell suggested that the applicant could bond for it, and then develop the Street when the other developer does their improvements. He stated that when the applicant comes forward with the parcel maps, that they could pay for the bonds at that time. Mr. Johnson asked the Commission as to what are the improvements going to consist of. City Engineer O'Donnell stated that the applicant would need to provide curb, gutter, and staggered streetlights. Community Development Director Brady stated that it would be required only their side of the street. Hap Johnson, an investor with Triple "J" Development indicated that he has concerns with the future cost of servicing the lights. Chairman LaPere noted to Mr. Johnson that the City Engineer and the Community Development Director would determine cost that would include the sharing of the lighting and would be part of the in-lieu fees. Commissioner Barnes asked City Engineer O'Donnell if the Development Agreement addressed Condition No. 44. City Engineer O'Donnell stated that it does not address the timing of the Condition. He stated that usually the City gives the developer flexibility of the improvements. He stated that it does however address the required improvements. Chairman LaPere asked City Engineer O'Donnell to read Condition No. 44 as modified. City Engineer O'Donnell stated that the revised Condition would read, 'The developer shall construct ha!f street improvements on Third Street as part of his development or pqy an in-lieu fie for the construction of the half street improvements. Mr. Johnson stated that he would like to address Condition No. 53. He asked if the power lines would need to be placed underground, or can the remain where they are. City Engineer O'Donnell stated that if they were in the roadway, they would need to be relocated. He stated that if they were not servicing Mr. Johnson's development, then he would not be responsible to have them placed underground. PAGE 5 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 16, 2003 Chairman LaPere asked the Commission if they had any further comments. There being no further comments, Chairman LaPere closed the Public Hearing at 6:30 PM, and requested the reading of the Resolution. MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY BARNES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-108, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF DESIGN REVIEW FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. 2003-01, TO BE LOCATED ON PASADENA AND CRANE STREETS - APN 377-151-057. MOVED BY MATTHIES, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-109, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, SUP NO. 2003-18 TO ALLOW OUTDOOR STORAGE FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. I 2003-01, WITHIN M-1 ZONING - APN 377-151-057. BUSINESS ITEMS 4. Minor Design Review of a Single Family Residence located at 16688 Joy Street. APN 379-191-005. Chairman LaPere indicated this is a Business Item and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Community Development Director Brady stated that this was a request for a Design Review of a Single Family home and requested Associate Planner Preisendanz to review it with the Commission. Associate Planner Preisendanz indicated that this Minor Design Review is for a 2,271 square foot single-story conventionally built home, to include a 40 square foot porch and a 488 square foot attached garage. He indicated that the proposed home would include four bedrooms, two bathrooms, and a two-car garage. He stated that the architectural design of the proposed residence would be classified as "Mediterranean Eclectic." Associate Planner Preisendanz stated that the applicant would provide front yard landscaping and would be required to provide a new six-foot wood fence. He indicated that this project meets all of the requirements of the LEMC. He stated that Staff recommends approval of the project based on the Findings, Exhibits, and subject to the Conditions of Approval. He indicated that the applicant was not able to attend the meeting. Chairman LaPere requested comments from the Public. There being no comments from the Public, discussion was brought back to the Commission for comments. Vice Chairman Uhlry asked Staff why is the applicant required to provide a pedestrian gate. PAGE 6 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 16, 2003 Associate Planner Preisendanz indicated that the gate was just to gain access to the backyard. Vice Chairman Uhlry had no further comments. Commissioner Matthies had no comments. Commissioner Barnes asked Staff if the residence has sewer hook-up. Associated Planner Preisendanz indicated "yes." Commissioner Barnes had no further comments. Chairman LaPere noted that Conditions No.8 and 21 are duplicates. Associate Planner Preisendanz noted the error, and indicated that he would have Condition No. 21 deleted. Chairman LaPere had no further comments. There being no further comments, Chairman LaPere requested the reading of the Resolution. MOVED BY BARNES, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-110, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 16688 JOY STREET, APN NO. 379-191-005. 5. Minor Design Review of a Single Family Residence located at 29410 Pinnell Street, APN 378-171-017. Chairman Barnes indicated that this is a Business item, and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Community Development Director Brady stated that this project is a request for a Single Family Residence, and requested that Associate Planner Preisendanz review it with the Commission. Associate Planner Preisendanz stated that this is a request for approval of a single-story 1,748 square foot manufactured home and a 544 square foot detached garage/bonus room. He stated that the total square feet of the home would be 2,292 on a 10,538 square foot lot. He stated that the home would include a three bedroom, two baths, and a detached garage/bonus room. He indicated that the applicant would provide front yard landscaping and would provide a new wrought iron fence along the southern property line perimeter. He stated that a six-foot high wood fence would be provided along the rear and northerly perimeter property lines, with the existing retaining wall PAGE 7 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 16, 2003 remaining in place. He want to point out to the Commission that Condition No.8 and 21 are duplicates, and that he would delete Condition No. 21. Associate Planner Preisendanz stated that the project meets all the minimum requirements of the LEMC and therefore Staff recommends approval of the project, based on the Findings, Exhibits, and is subject to the Conditions of Approval. He indicated that the applicant is present to answer any questions that the Commission may have. Chairman LaPere asked if anyone wished to speak either for or against this project. Jackie Fenaroli, 23663 Pepperleaf Street, Murrieta, CA stated that she would be able to answer any questions that the Commission may have. There being no further comments, Chairman LaPere brought the discussion back to the Commission for comments. Commissioner Barnes stated that this is a good in-fill project, and had no further comments. Vice Chairman Uhlry stated that he concurs with Commissioner Barnes and had no comments. Commissioner Matthies had no comments. Ms. Fenaroli asked if Condition No.9, where it indicates that a 6-foot wood fence shall be required along the side and rear property line, if she could change it to a wrought iron fence. Chairman LaPere indicated that the Commission would approve that change. Associate Planner Preisendanz indicated that Staff would also approve that change. Ms. Fenaroli also pointed out to the Commission that Condition No. 16 states that the applicant shall plant street trees along the frontage of all streets. She noted that there are already three Fan Palms planted and wanted to know if this could satisfy this requirement. Associate Planner Preisendanz indicated that Condition No. 16 could be deleted. Chairman LaPere also indicated that there is a City Ordinance that objects any removal of palm trees within the City Limits. Chairman LaPere indicated that their were no further comments, and therefore requested the reading of the Resolution. MOVED BY MATTHIES, SECONDED BY BARNES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-111, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 29410 PINNELL STREET, APN 378-171-017. PAGE 8 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 16, 2003 6. Minor Design Review of a Single Family Residence located at 416 Granite Street, APN 377-311-003. Chairman LaPere indicated that this is a Business Item, and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Community Development Director Brady indicated that the item before the Commission is a request for a Single Family Home to be constructed within the Historic Overlay District, and requested Associate Planner Miller to review the report with the Commission. Associate Planner Miller stated that the applicant is proposing to construct a 1,460 square foot one story home with a 110 square foot porch and a 475 square foot attach garage for a total building footprint of 2,045 square feet. She indicated that the unit would include two bedrooms, and a laundry area. She stated that the architectural design of the proposed home is Craftsman style, which is one of the architectural style required for the historic Overlay District. Associate Planner Miller stated that the applicant is requesting approval of a "turn-in" garage in the Historic Overlay District. She indicated that some projects have been approved with "turn- in" garages and some have not. She stated that Staff has met with the applicant and decided that since the architectural design of the residence was a Craftsman style and worth consideration, staff would take the project forward for the Planning Commission to consider. Associate Planner Miller indicated that that Staff Recommends approval of this project based on the Findings, Exhibits, and subject to the Conditions of Approval. She stated that the applicant is present to answer any questions that the Commission may have. Chairman LaPere indicated that a request from George Mears wishes to approach to podium to speak regarding this project. George Mears, 41045 Arron Court, Murrieta, CA is the owner of the property, and indicated that he agrees to all of the Conditions of Approval to the project. He indicated that he would prefer a side entry to a garage opposed to a direct entry to a garage for a few reasons. One he indicated was because the alley in not maintained or lit at night, which could cause a safety issue. Secondly, he stated, the homebuyer owns a four-wheel drive, and would be easier for him to access the garage. The applicant had no further comments. Chairman LaPere requested comments from the Commission. Commissioner Barnes indicated that it is 58-foot wide lot, and would barely have enough room for a driveway from the front to the back. He stated that it would be a good alternative to have the garage turned-in. He stated that therefore he would agree with the change. Commissioner Matthies concurred with Commissioner Barnes. She indicated that the home blends in well with the area. She had no further comments. Vice Chairman Uhlry indicated that he likes the project, and likes the idea of the window in the garage. He had no further comments. PAGE 9 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 16 2003 , Chairman LaPere stated that he feels that the turning of the garage is a good idea, and recommends that the turn of the garages should be dealt with on an individual basis for each home, concerning of the lot. Vice Chairman Uhlry concluded that Staff if requested that the Planning Commission review each case on an individual basis, and would give Staff direction on their opinion. Chairman LaPere requested any further comments from the Commission. There being no further comments, Chairman LaPere requested the reading of the Resolution. MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY BARNES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-112, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 416 GRANITE STREET, APN 377-311-003. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS NONE STAFF COMMENTS Community Development Director Brady commented on the following: . He wanted to advise the Commission and the Public that Commissioner Nash unfortunately had to resign his position of Commission due to unforeseen reasons. . He wished everyone Happy Holidays, and New Year. . He also informed the Commission that due to the Holidays, there would not be a Planning Commission on January 6, 2004. . He also wanted to inform the Commission that the City Council Meeting for December 23, 2003 has been canceled due to the Holidays. . He also wanted to inform the Commission that City Engineer O'Donnell is retiring and that this would be his last Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chairman LaPere commented on the following: . He indicated that we would miss Commission Nash, and wished him well success on his new business. He recommended that the City Staff and the City Council follow the same past practices on selecting a new City Engineer would be similar to the procedure that the Planning Commission had to go through in order to get the best-qualified person for this position. . He wanted to congratulate Dan Uhlry on becoming the new Vice Chairman for the Planning Commission. PAGE 10 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 16, 2003 . He also indicated that he would miss City Engineer O'Donnell, and wished him well on his retirement. Vice Chairman Uhlry commented on the following: · He stated that he would miss Nick Nash very much, as his had helped him in the past when he fIrst came aboard the Planning Commission. · He also wanted to congratulate City Engineer O'Donnell on his retirement. . He wanted to wish everyone a safe and pleasant New Year, and a Merry Christmas. Commission Matthies commented on the following: . She concurred with the other Commissioners on missing Nick Nash. . She also wanted to welcome back Linda Miller. . She too wished all a Happy New Year, and a Merry Christmas. Commission Barnes commented on the following: . He wanted to point out to the Commission how well of a job that Nick Nash has done for the Planning Commission. He wished him well with his new business. . He also wanted to wish City Engineer O'Donnell a successful retirement. . He wanted to congratulate Chairman LaPere and Vice Chairman Uhlry on their new positions on the Planning Commission. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY MATTHIES SECONDED UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRE NT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A 7:10 P Respectfully Submitted, PAGE 11 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 16, 2003 !1/(CUu;:L Dana C. Porche' Office Specialist III ATTEST: c 16~('a) obert A. Brady, Secre Planning Commission