HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Special Meeting Agenda Packet 09-28-2015City of Lake Elsinore
Special Meeting Agenda
City Council
STEVE MANOS, MAYOR
BRIAN TISDALE, MAYOR PRO TEM
DARYL HICKMAN, COUNCIL MEMBER
ROBERT MAGEE, COUNCIL MEMBER
NATASHA JOHNSON, COUNCIL MEMBER
GRANT YATES, CITY MANAGER
LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG
(951) 674-3124 PHONE
CULTURAL CENTER
183 N. MAIN STREET
LAKE ELSINORE, CA
92530
Monday, September 28, 2015 5:30 PM Cultural Center
CLOSED SESSION at 5:30 PM
Cultural Center
183 N. Main St., Lake Elsinore
PUBLIC SESSION at 6:00 PM
Cultural Center
183 N. Main St., Lake Elsinore
The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the Council
and Agency with valuable information regarding issues of the community.
If you are attending this City Council Meeting, please park in the parking lot across the street
from the Cultural Center. This will assist us in limiting the impact of meetings on the
Downtown Business District.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who
requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact
the City Clerk's Department at (951) 674-3124 Ext. 269, at least 24 hours before the meeting
to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.
CITY VISION STATEMENT
The City of Lake Elsinore will be the ultimate lake destination where all can live, work and
play, build futures and fulfill dreams.
City of Lake Elsinore Page 7 Printed on 912412015
City Council Special Meeting Agenda September 28, 2015
CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -EXISTING LITIGATION
(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Gov't Code § 54956.9)
Castle & Cooke Lake Elsinore West, Inc. v. City of Lake Elsinore
Superior Court Case No. MCC 1301756
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL --ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d)
of Gov't Code Section 54956.9: (1 potential case)
PUBLIC COMMENTS
(Please read & complete a Request to Address the City Council form prior to the start of
the City Council meeting and turn it in to the City Clerk, The Mayor or City Clerk will call
on you to speak.)
CALL TO ORDER - 6:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INVOCATION — MOMENT OF SILENT PRAYER
ROLL CALL
CLOSED SESSION REPORT
PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 1 MINUTE
(Please read & complete a Request to Address the City Council form prior to the start of
the City Council meeting and tum it in to the City Clerk. The Mayor or City Clerk will call
on you to speak.)
CONSENT CALENDAR
(All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved in one motion, unless a Council
Member or any member of the public requests separate action on a specific item.)
1) ID# 15-774 Letter of Support for Studio 395 Our Town Grant Application
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of a letter of support for
Studio 395 Our Town Grant Application.
Attachments: LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR STUDIO 395 OUR TOWN GRANT APPLICATION
City of Lake Elsinore Page 2 Printed on 912412015
City Council Special Meeting Agenda September 28, 2015
PUBLIC HEARING(S) - None
APPEAL(S) - None
BUSINESS ITEM(S)
2) ID# 15-775 Selection of a Locally Preferred Alternative for the 1-15/Railroad
Canyon Road & Franklin Interchange Project
Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council:
1.) Select one of the following alternatives, as the locally preferred alternative to move
forward with the final design of Phase 1 of the 1-15/Railroad Canyon Road & Franklin
Interchange Project:
a. Alternative 1: No Build
b. Alternative 2: Northbound Hook Ramp to Grape Street
c. Alternative 3: North & Southbound Hook Ramps at Grape Street &
Casino Drive
d. Alternative 4: Modern Roundabout Corridor along Diamond Drive & Railroad
Canyon Road.
2.) Direct the City Manager to request the Riverside County Transportation
Commission (RCTC) to extend its project management services through project
completion and Caltrans acceptance, in coordination with Sustainable Civil Engineering
Solutions, and to prepare any necessary agreement(s) for such services.
Attachments: FinalStaff Report - Selection of Locally Preferred Alternatives 092415
Selection of Locally Preferreds Alternatives - updated Exhibit A
Sept22-2015 Exhibit B
PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 3 MINUTES
(Please read & complete a Request to Address the City Council form prior to the start of
the City Council Meeting and tum it into the City Clerk. The Mayor or City Clerk will call
on you to speak.)
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
City or Lake Elsinore Page 3 Printed on 912412015
City Council Special Meeting Agenda September 28, 2015
ADJOURNMENT
The Lake Elsinore City Council will adjourn this meeting to the next regularly scheduled
meeting of Tuesday, October 13, 2015. The regular Closed Session meeting will be held at
5:00 p.m. at Cultural Center and the regular Public meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. at the
Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA.
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I, Diana Giron, Acting City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, do hereby affirm that a copy of
the foregoing agenda wa posted at City Hall 24 hours in advance of this meeting.
Diana iron, Acting Cffy Clerk
City of Lake Elsinore Page 4 Printed on 9/24/2015
CITY OF ��
LAKE
LSZ`fCl2�E
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: GRANT YATES, CITY MANAGER
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28, 2015
SUBJECT: LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR STUDIO 395 OUR TOWN GRANT
APPLICATION
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of a letter of support for Studio
395 Our Town Grant Application.
DISCUSSION
On July 28, 2015 the City Council approved Mayor Manos and Council Member Johnson
to meet with local arts group Studio 395 to discuss the enhancement of arts and culture
in Lake Elsinore. Studio 395 is in the process of applying for the National Endowment of
the Arts (NEA) "Our Town" Grant to assist in the funding of "Artcademy", a location for
local artist to create and engage the community via classes, shows, events and shopping
in the City of Lake Elsinore. The application calls for letters of support from various
partners in the community. With Council approval, the Mayor will sign a letter of support
for Studio 395's application submission on City Council letterhead.
FISCAL IMPACT
None at this time.
Agenda Date: 9/28/2015
In Control: City Council
Agenda Number: 1)
City of Lake Elsinore
Text File
File Number: ID# 15-774
Version: 1
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
w lake-elsinore.org
Status: Consent Agenda
File Type: Report
City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 9/24/2015
LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR STUDIO 395 OUR TOWN GRANT APPLICATION
SEPTEMBER 28, 2015
Page 2
Prepared by: Audrey Young
Management Analyst
Johnathan O. Skinner
Director of Community Services
Approved by: Grant Yates
City Manager
tKi; (SES Itt3l�ls
Agenda Date: 9/28/2015
In Control: City Council
Agenda Number: 2)
City of Lake Elsinore
Text File
File Number: ID# 15-775
Version: 1
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
w .lake-elsinore.org
Status: Approval Final
File Type: Report
City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 9/24/2015
CITY OT
LADE LSINORE
DREAM EXTREME.
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: GRANT M. YATES, CITY MANAGER
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28, 2015
SUBJECT: Selection of a Locally Preferred Alternative for the I-15/Railroad
Canyon Road & Franklin Interchange Prosect
Recommendation
1. Select one of the following alternatives, as the locally preferred alternative to
move forward with the final design of Phase 1 of the 1-15/Railroad Canyon Road
& Franklin Interchange Project:
a. Alternative 1: No Build
b. Alternative 2: Northbound Hook Ramp to Grape Street
c. Alternative 3: North & Southbound Hook Ramps at Grape Street &
Casino Drive
d. Alternative 4: Modern Roundabout Corridor along Diamond Drive &
Railroad Canyon Road.
2. Direct the City Manager to request the Riverside County Transportation
Commission (RCTC) to extend its project management services through project
completion and Caltrans acceptance, in coordination with Sustainable Civil
Engineering Solutions, and to prepare any necessary agreement(s) for such
services.
Background
The Railroad Canyon Road and 1-15 Interchange is a significant regional transportation
corridor, serving the cities of Lake Elsinore, Menifee, Canyon Lake and the County of
Riverside. Due to the continuous growth in the area, for many years this interchange
has faced increased traffic congestion and unnecessary delays for travelers. The
current design can no longer adequately serve the community.
In 2010, the City began studying more than 28 improvement alternatives for this
interchange. Upon review by the design consultant and Caltrans, only two alternatives,
which are referred to in this Report as Alternatives 2 and 3, were found to adequately
address current and projected growth while meeting Caltrans design standards. In
October 2013, the City reinitiated the project approval and environmental design
(PA&ED) phase of the 1-15/Railroad Canyon Road Interchange Project.
Selection of Locally Preferred Alternative for the 1-15/Railroad Canyon Road & Franklin
Interchange Project
September 28, 2015
Page 2
In May 2014, Alternative 4, otherwise known as the Modern Roundabout Alternative,
was added as a viable alternative to be studied. The roundabout operation in -lieu of
traffic signals at interchange entrance and exit ramps has been found to effectively
improve traffic congestion and safety. All new proposed projects with signalized
intersections are now required by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and
Caltrans to study the feasibility of roundabout construction as part of their alternative
analysis.
In an effort to avoid any future constructability issues, Caltrans District 8 engaged
FHWA, Caltrans District roundabout experts, and contracted with a roundabout
consultant to provide a Peer Review of Alternative 4. Based on a focus meeting held on
August 11, 2015, it was determined that the proposed roundabout configurations and
geometrics of Alternative 4 meet all design requirements and no fatal flaws were
identified by the Caltrans Peer Review Team.
Since reinitiating the PA&ED phase, the City has held two City Council updates, two
Public Workshops, and four focus meetings with Caltrans and FHWA. Public feedback
received from the workshops and a project website, www.RRCanvonlnterchancie.com,
has been mostly positive and supportive of Alternative 4 due to its unique corridor
enhancement features and ability to handle build -out traffic volumes.
Discussion - Alternatives
To date, majority of the technical studies have been approved as part of the PA&ED
phase. The remaining studies and reports including the New Connection Report are
expected to be completed by December 2015. The New Connection Report can only
focus on one of the proposed alternatives. Therefore, in order to maintain the projected
PA&ED completion timeline the report has to be prepared and submitted to Caltrans
and FHWA for review and approval prior to the circulation of the draft environmental
document. Since there are currently three viable alternatives under consideration, the
City Council must select a locally preferred alternative and direct the project team to
pursue said alternative to proceed with the PA&ED phase of the project.
All alternatives, except for Alternative 1 which is a no -build alternative, are viable
alternatives for the City Council to consider. Each alternative includes two phases.
Phase 1 directly addresses the Railroad Canyon Road Interchange. Phase 2
improvements are the same for all three alternatives and will include a new, full
interchange at Franklin Street.
Selection of Locally Preferred Alternative for the 1-15/Railroad Canyon Road & Franklin
Interchange Project
September 28, 2015
Page 3
Alternatives 2, 3 and 4, as shown in Exhibit A, include the following:
Alternative 2: Northbound Hook Ramp to Grape Street
• Phase 1 Improvements:
o Elimination of the existing northbound entrance and exit ramp at Railroad
Canyon Road
o Construction of a new northbound entrance and exit hook ramps at Grape
Street
o Widening Railroad Canyon Road under the freeway to eight travel lanes
o Widening the southbound entrance ramp and reconstruction of the
southbound exit ramp.
• Phase 2 Improvements:
o Construction of a new four lane overcrossing interchange approximately
1,000 feet north of the existing Franklin Street overcrossing while maintaining
the existing Franklin Street overpass.
o Realignment of the southbound Main Street entrance ramp, and construction
of traffic signals at Main Street/1-15 entrance and exit ramps.
Alternative 3: North & Southbound Hook Ramps at Grape Street & Casino Drive
• Phase 1 Improvements:
o Elimination of the existing northbound and southbound entrance and exit
ramps at Railroad Canyon Road
o Construction of a new northbound entrance and exit hook ramps at Grape
Street
o Construction of a new southbound entrance and exit hook ramps at Casino
Drive
• Phase 2 Improvements:
o Construction of a new four lane overcrossing interchange approximately
1,000 feet north of the existing Franklin Street overcrossing while maintaining
the existing Franklin Street overpass.
o Realignment of the southbound Main Street entrance ramp, and construction
of traffic signals at Main Street/1-15 entrance and exit ramps.
Alternative 4: Modern Roundabout Corridor along Diamond Drive & Railroad
Canyon Road
• Phase 1 Improvements:
o Railroad Canyon Road corridor reconstruction of portions of Diamond Drive &
Railroad Canyon Road from the southerly side of the intersection of Diamond
Drive & Lakeshore/Mission Trail to the northerly side of the intersection of
Railroad Canyon Road & Summerhill Drive/Grape Street
o Reconstruction of portions of affected roadways to conform to five new,
multi -lane modern roundabouts intersections.
o Removal of five existing traffic signals at corresponding intersections.
o Reconstruction of portions of existing northbound and southbound ramps to
conform to the roundabout geometric design configuration.
Selection of Locally Preferred Alternative for the 1-15/Railroad Canyon Road & Franklin
Interchange Project
September 28, 2015
Page 4
• Phase 2 Improvements:
o Construction of a new four lane overcrossing interchange approximately
1,000 feet north of the existing Franklin Street overcrossing while maintaining
the existing Franklin Street overpass.
o Realignment of the southbound Main Street entrance ramp, and construction
of traffic signals at Main Street/1-15 entrance and exit ramps.
Based on the Traffic Impact Analysis, all three alternatives would improve the existing
and projected levels of service at the entrance and exit ramp intersections along with
the local intersections. The studied intersections' level of service varies depending on
the alternative.
The attached Exhibit B provides an alternative comparison table reflecting major
differences between the alternatives including estimated construction cost, number of
right of way property acquisitions, constructability, improved intersection level of service,
and estimated construction duration. It should, however, be noted that the estimated
right-of-way acquisition cost may vary depending on final outcome of the property
negotiation and the final impact determination, which may require a full take of a
property that is currently considered as a partial take.
The City has been successful in securing additional Transportation Uniform Mitigation
Fee (TUMF) Regional funding for Phase 1 improvements through RCTC in the amount
of $4.6 M to complete the final design for the selected alternative and to purchase the
required right-of-way. With the current allocated funds, the City would be able to initiate
the final design and right-of-way acquisition shortly after the completion of the PA&ED
phase. Once the project is in the design and right-of-way phase, the project team will
apply for State and Federal grant funding for the ultimate construction of these
improvements.
It is recommended that the City Council consider Alternatives 2, 3 and 4 and provide
staff direction on the locally preferred alternative for the 1-15/Railroad Canyon Road &
Franklin Interchange Project.
Discussion — Project Management
In recognition of the magnitude of the 1-15/Railroad Canyon Road & Franklin
Interchange Project, project management responsibilities were transferred from the City
to RCTC in June 2011. It is recommended that RCTC continue its project management
responsibilities through completion of construction and Caltrans acceptance. These
services should be coordinated through Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions
(SCES), the City's professional engineering consultant for the project. The terms of
such services should be set forth in an amendment to the June 2011 Agreement
between the City and RCTC or a new agreement as appropriate.
Selection of Locally Preferred Alternative for the 1-15/Railroad Canyon Road & Franklin
Interchange Project
September 28, 2015
Page 5
Fiscal Impact
This action does not have any fiscal impact. Funds to complete the PA&ED, and Phase
1 final design and right-of-way acquisition, have already been allocated from the TUMF
Regional and Zone funding. No additional local matching fund is required to complete
the PA&ED, and Phase 1 design and right-of-way acquisition.
Prepared by: Ati Eskandari, P.E.
Project Manager
Approved by: Jim Smith
Interim Director of Pubic Works
Grant M. Yates
City Manager
Attachments: Exhibit A — Exhibits for Alternatives 2, 3, 4 and Phase 2
Exhibit B — Alternative Comparison Table
EXHIBIT A
Alternative 2, Phase 1 - Hook Ramps to Grape Street
Phase 1 Project Cost = $22,6449000
EXHIBIT A
Alternative 3, Phase 1 - Hook Ramps to Grape Street & Casino Dr
Phase 1 Project Cost = $33,700,000
Alternative Comparison - General Data
Phase
Item
No Build
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
Alternative 4
Roadway
$0
$14,324,000
$16,526,000
$15,433,000
Bridge
$0
$2,100,000
$2,900,000
$0
1
Right of Way/Utilities*
$0
$3,000,000 - $12,000,000
$9,937,000 - $22,187,000
$3,851,000 - $10,000,000
Support Cost
$0
$3,220,000
$4,337,000
$3,116,000
Subtotal with RNV
Cost*
$0
$22,644,000 to $31,644,000
$33,700,000 to $45,950,000
$22,400,000 to $28,549,000
Roadway
$0
$27,314,000
$27,314,000
$27,314,000
Bridge
$0
$4,900,000
$4,900,000
$4,900,000
2
Right of Way/Utility
$0
$18,065,000
$18,065,000
$18,065,000
Support Cost
$0
$7,321,000
$7,321,000
$7,321,000
Subtotal
$0
$57,600,000
$57,600,000
$57,600,000
1 & 2
TOTAL
$0
$80,244,000-$89,244,000
$91,300,000-$103,560,000
$80,000,000-$86,149,000
* Note: Right of Way Cost Considering Potential Property Full Acquisition and Impact Compensation.
EXHIBIT B
Alternative Comparison - General Data
Phase
Item
Alternative 1 No Build
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
Alternative 4
Traffic Failure Year
NOW
2032
2032
2025
Property Impacted
0
5**
12**
17*
Partial Acquisitions
0
5**
9**
14*
Full Acquisitions
0
0
3(2 Business, 1 Parking Area)
3(Vacant Land)
Constructability
N/A
Simple
Medium
Complex
Requires Railroad Cyn Rd
Closures
N/A
Yes, bridge false work
Yes, bridge false work
No, only lane closures
Requires Ramp Closure
N/A
Yes, temporary
Yes, temporary
Yes, temporary -30 Days
Ramps to be Closed
N/A
NB Ramps
NB & SB Ramps
NB & SB Ramps
1
Temporary Detours
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
Detour Complexity
N/A
Low
Low
Medium -High
Construction Length
N/A
18-24 months
18-24 months
12-18 months
Business Accessibility
during Construction
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
Visual & Aesthetic Impact
N/A
Low
Low
Low
Landscape Beautification
Opportunities
N/A
Low
Low
High
Air Quality
N/A
Low
Low
Low
Construction Funding
Competitiveness
N/A
Low
Low
High
Personal to have 1 commercial parcel to become a full acquisition EXHIBIT B
' Potential to have a Commercial parcels to become a full acquisition
Alternative Comparison - General Data
Phase
Item
Alternative 1 No Build
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
Alternative 4
Pedestrian & Bicycles
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Allowed During and After
Construction Completion
1
Temporary Noise (Bridge
N/A
Yes
Yes
No
Piers — Pile Driving)
Number of Traffic Signals
N/A
5
5
0
(New or Reconstructed)
1 O
Length of Construction
N/A
+18 months
+18 months
+18 months
OG
(Phase 2)
(2040
Max .Vehicle Delay
431.6
67.2
60.4
23.8
(seconds) at Intersections
Design
Max. queue at
1,188 feet
387 feet
387 feet
320 feet
Year)
Intersections Ramps
Intersection Level of
F
E
E
C
Service (LOS)
Lowest LOS Intersection
All Intersections
RRCR-Grape St
RRCR-Grape St
RRCR-SB Ramps
Freeway LOS
F
D
D
D
EXHIBIT B
Alternative Comparison - Level of Service
EXHIBIT B
2040
2013
Alternative 1
Existing
Alternative
Alternative
Alternative
NO Build
LOCATION
AM PEAK
PM PEAK
AM PEAK
PM PEAK
AM PEAK
PM PEAK
AM PEAK
PM PEAK
AM PEAK
PM PEAK
HOUR
HOUR
HOUR
HOUR
HOUR
HOUR
HOUR
HOUR
HOUR
HOUR
Delay
Delay
Delay
Delay
Delay
Delay
Delay
Delay
Delay
Delay
(sect
LOS
(sec)
LOS
(sec)
LOS
(sec)
LOS
(sec)
LOS
(sec)
LOS
(sec)
LOS
(sec)
LOS
(sec)
LOS
(sec)
LOS
Diamond Dr-RRCR at Mission Trail -Lake
Share Or
17.3
B
21.7
C
67.4
E
880
F
34.8
C
20.6
C
15.0
B
26.7
C
112
B
22.1
C
Diamond Dr-RRCR at Casino Dr -Auto
Center Dr
14.9
0
25.7
C
601
E
1046
F
192
a
185
B
15.4
B
17.1
B
7.9
A
12.8
B
ilroad Cyn Rd (RRCR) at 1.1558 Ramps
35.4
D
61.9
E
33>S
F {
368.0
F !
11.3
B
15.4
B
9.5
A
25.6
C
10.7
B
27.6
C
Railroad Cyn Rd at 1-15 NB Ramps
74.5
E
923
F
325,4
F
431.6
:
38.5
D
37.3
D
15.7
B
18.3
B
8.6
A
8.4
A
Railroad Lyn Rd at Grape St -Summerhill
8$.2
F
122.7
F
225.8
F :
20y.7
F
34.6
C
673
E
35.0
C
60.4
E
12.7
B
23.8
C
Or
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF^
LADE 0LSINORE
� DREAM EXTREME..
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special City Council meeting will be held on
Monday, September 28, 2015, in the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center, 183 N. Main
Street, Lake Elsinore, California, at 5:30 p.m. The purpose of the Special Meeting is to
discuss the following:
CLOSED SESSION — 5:30 PM
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -EXISTING LITIGATION
(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Gov't Code § 54956.9)
Castle & Cooke Lake Elsinore West, Inc. v. City of Lake Elsinore
Superior Court Case No. MCC 1301756
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL --ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of
Gov't Code Section 54956.9: (1 potential case)
PUBLIC SESSION CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM — 6:00 PM
Letter of Support for Studio 395 for Our Town Grant Application
PUBLIC SESSION BUSINESS ITEM
Selection of a Locally Preferred Alternative for the 1-15/Railroad
Canyon Road & Franklin Interchange Project
FURTHER INFORMATION, if available, maybe obtained by contacting the City Clerk's
Office at City Hall (951) 674-3124, Ext. 269 or by visiting the City's website at
www. Lake-Elsinore.Org,.
DATE: September 24, 2015
Diana Giron
Acting City Clerk
CITY Or
............................
LAK.E C?,LSIROKE.
.EAM EXTREME
i!L
4
mss,
3 L�
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
(Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting)
Pleast Print
Organization
Represented:
Address Phone
► I wish to address Agenda Item No. . (Comments limited to 3 minutes)
► I wish to comment on the following non -a endized item at the beginning of the
meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute)
► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting:
(Comments limited to 3 minutes)
Date
i
Signature
The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non-
Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have
approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting).
After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to
comment upon the item you wish to address.
Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is
appreciated!
CITr OF
LAYNT S IA
Name:
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
(Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting)
r �\
< F
Please Print
Organization
Represented:
VA
Address Phone
► I wish to address Agenda Item No. (Comments limited to 3 minutes)
► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the
meetln : (Comments limited to 1 minute)
11-5
► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting:
(Comments limited to 3 minutes)
I Z -LS
Datteoig at re
The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non-
Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have
approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting).
After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to
comment upon the item you wish to address.
Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is
appreciated!
C[Ty 7t
Li � LSMO
MuANA EXTREME
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
(Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting)
Name: tv^
Organization
Represented:
5
Address
► I wish to address Agenda Item No.
!
Please Print
3
• . a
(Comments limited to 3 minutes)
► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the
meetlnq: (Comments limited to 1 minute)
► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting:
(Comments limited to 3 minutes)
Date
Signature
The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non-
Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have
approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting).
After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to
comment upon the item you wish to address.
Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is
appreciated!