Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CC & SA Regular Agenda Packet 07-14-2015
CITYOF ..ri`c� LAKE LSII`IORTE EXTREME. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. and direct the City Clerk to file with the Riverside County Auditor a certified copy of Resolution No. _ along with the 120 -days past due accounts report. Background: On June 9, 1992, CR&R, Inc. was awarded an exclusive franchise agreement to provide solid waste collection and recycling services. Due to uncollectible accounts resulting from non-payment from property owners and renters, City Council approved collections via the tax rolls. These collections are for those accounts whose payments are delinquent a minimum of 120 -days. These costs are to include the delinquent charges, the appropriate late payments, processing fees and the trash collection and recycling fees for the following year. Exhibit 'A' is a summary of charges related to the delinquent trash accounts. Discussion: As of July 01, 2015, there are 727 delinquent accounts totaling $125,695.94. Every opportunity will be given to collect delinquent accounts until the tax roll must be filed with the county. Due to these delinquent accounts and CR&R's past actions to collect for services rendered, CR&R has provided a list of accounts to be placed on the tax roll for collection. Refuse Charges on Tax Roll July 14, 2015 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the City's general fund in filing this report. Prepared by: Nicole McCalmont Sr. Engineering Technician Jim Smith Interim Director of Public Works Approved by: Grant M. Yates City Manager Attachment: Resolution Exhibit 'A' — A Summary of Charges Page 1 of 2 County Fund No. 68-2370 RESOLUTION NO. 2015- A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA AFFIRMING THE REPORT OF DELINQUENT RESIDENTIAL REFUSE FEES AND DIRECTING THEIR COLLECTION ON THE PROPERTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, a written report of residential refuse collection fees delinquent as of July 1, 2015 has been prepared and filed with the City Clerk as set out in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the Health and Safety Code. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The report of residential refuse collection fees delinquent as of July 1, 2015 attached to and incorporated herewith in this resolution hereby is confirmed. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this resolution and of the report with the County Auditor, The County Auditor is designated and empowered to perform the duties as necessary. SECTION 2. The fees set forth in the report shall constitute a special assessment against the respective parcels on which they are levied and are a lien against such property. The assessment shall be collected at the same time and subject to the same procedures provided such taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection and enforcement of ad valorem property taxes shall be applicable to such assessments, except that if any real property to which such fees or changes relate has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide encumbrance for value has been created and attached thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes would become delinquent, then a lien which would otherwise be imposed shall not attach to such real property and the fees or charges or interest shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection. SECTION 3. The City shall remit the fees collected to the franchised solid waste collector within 15 -days after receipt thereof. SECTION 4. That portion of the principal, interest and other costs related to the delinquent trash accounts to be placed on the County Tax Rolls and be collected by the Riverside County Tax Collector, as provided for in Exhibit "A" (a summary of fixed charges). CC Resolution No. 2013 - Page 2 of 2 SECTION 5. That the properties to be assessed and the related amounts are submitted on magnetic tape as requested by the Riverside County Tax Collector, further identified as County Fund No. 68-2370. SECTION 6. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1411 day of July, 2015. Steve Manos, Mayor City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Virginia Bloom, City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Leibold, City Attorney City of Lake Elsinore EXHIBIT "A" - Summary of Charges CUST# Total 6.30.15 SERVICE ADDR SERVICE CITY SERVICE STATE SERVICE ZIP 33731 10.52 y970 PARKWAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-185-056 41682 i1 19 15423 REGATTA WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-641-011 27962 1328 ..'35316 TRAILSIDE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-852-029 23016 1383 353217 REALES ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-521-008 1638 39 29 t ,{301 DATE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-362-003 35201 1492 15071 AMOROSEST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-521-020 36927 SA 92x,'i29520 WESTWINDDR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-571-031 28142 1b 9Q 21068 CREEKSIDE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-313-004 258701735, `i32115 TERRA COT TA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-521-026 38379 1825 , ;213 CAMPUS WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374 122-008 17760 1905 31750 MACHADO ST #21 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-140-010 22203 2093 ." >519525 PALOMARST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-530-014 23005 23.68 �, v309 MOHRST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-091-012 41466 2252 ;33 PLAZAAVILA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-361-022 35772 236? `3701 CONCORD CIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-281-042 36864 :2$67 "53 CORTE MADERA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-383-005 41488 23 $8 :31521 STONEY CREEK DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-334-006 41369 ;2949, L 522 N SPRING ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 377 242-029 28529 1 15132 TEAKWOOD ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387483-001 37284 1-2611 s 38 VIA DEL FICO CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-751-004 40761 X11 r r ,� ;34318 OTAY WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-280-017 402081743 t ' a2 BELLA FIRENZE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-512009 36277 X2836 a ;.16289 LAKESHORE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-422-019 36335 29 R5 `r S-34274 TORREY PINES CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-800-052 38337 329 2S $ ' '� e'35208 ANGEL FALLS DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-400-001 32701 >2947c. 4 ' t,39 VISTA TOSCANA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-442-005 42169 ;'1974 y r.. 1026 PARKWAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-201-003 39832X976 ~' 53089 MEMORIAL ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-580-022 26799 f31 SO t t i 119785 BERRYWOOD DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-522-002 263483 2 ` 8 t 33803 MOSSY OLIN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-230-035 38831 x$67 ;13366 FIR CIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-681 022 33569 X396 <t �1-,r1; 276 E HEALD AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-041-010 28136 31782 VIA VALDEZ LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-272-009 40410 X3482 r r e ?34129 NORRIS ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-750-003 364621T r r -'s33 PORTE LOREN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-501-012 41854 570 s X1012 DOLLY DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-361-021 36300 t X35 $2 r E ,'31180 TORREYST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-241-042 7025 353 + 151471RONWOODST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-451-005 39870 3593 h 29244 SANDPIPER DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-750-012 39812 360Q =3705 EISENHOWER DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-314-013 11371 628 s'i 378 AVENUE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-192-021 28754 _ ,3@ b4 ,. F:; 15700 SHADOW MTN LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387 121-009 15173 ?3893 3 X28992 BAYBERRY DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-660-013 37256 (4p 67 -'16630 ESCAVERAST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-470-003 36834 '4p 93 ;34210 BELFAIR WAY LAKE EL51NORE CA 92532 363-231-016 13528 '+4102 3.,.`3 PO NTE BRAVA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-501-015 40186 4149 -l16389 ORANGE BLOSSOM WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-443-007 32968 41.69 .;28 PONTE RUSSO LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-482-028 35166 425211, `32109 TERRACOTTAST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-522-022 16185 '43,28 ;29362 SWAN AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-203-010 24660 43.94 334275 DEERGRASS WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-250-057 33112 44,16 F52982 ALBA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 349-600-005 28067 4,57 =35431 SADDLE HILL RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-862-011 41778 45,61":801 SOLANOCT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-621-009 27450 45.93 ' :.45011 ANABELLE LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-453-027 30873 46,64 ;41106 ROYALSUNSET RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-511-030 34453 4739 1600 PARKVIEW DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-343-005 37575 .47.76 `.'29095 ALLAN ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 377-392-003 34176 4$.4$ ,3903 EISENHOWER DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-314-022 39184 SUR ` -417 GRANITE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 377-283-020 38577 51.23 )314 N KELLOGG ST A LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-044-022 40003 $2.69 .. X314 N LINDSAY ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-053-004 36439 53',3$x` ''52993 ALBA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 349-600-013 39064 y3.40 ;710 LAKE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-185-050 26631 1 DEL PIZZOU LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-401-008 14125 563D '!3481 PEAR BLOSSOM LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-364-005 14424471 "^31874 CEDARHILL LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-611-008 36290 SG 9A X31954 BOTANY CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-630-025 40565 57 $8 ' '.41018 MARQUISE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-520-015 41921 $$ 75, '=''3630 RAVEN DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-171-038 8994 590$ .x'1010 LAKE MEADOW CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-292-063 41825 59 6 153019 BANTRY BAY ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-541-023 40355 _ 39 HB L"`30505 CANYON HILLS RD 4603 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-212-015 41787 6045"'4102 COTTONWOOD CIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-711-012 39385 6169 131765 CANYON RIDGE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-282-017 29005 6323 21028 CANYON RIDGE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-281-019 41991 6353 36419 GERANIUM DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-611-038 30500 G3 @3 ''3401 CHERRY BLOSSOM LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-362-021 36525 6428 '15126 VIA VALLE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-281-011 37701 64 fi7 '-`-4 PLAZAAVILA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-361-040 29991 6W 86 (21028 CANYON RIDGE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-281-019 1164 16518 MOUNTAIN 57 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-394-027 7283 69182 ",=1621 GRIFFIN WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-112-028 11158 6A52 ';1041 LAKE MEADOW CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-292-067 40461 40996 BANKHALLST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-533-018 10818 '63 93 ;15152 VERSAILLES ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-533-002 377413�?3 ,.`32077 POPPY WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-562-021 26746 3317 ASPEN CIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-701-032 26817 f6$'2$ `35333 TRAILSIDE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-850-012 31847 X6$'2$ { ^.1136 CLEVELAND CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-313-018 41037 1$28 <T33158 LEEWARD WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 386-183-004 37648 ;6$30 �> .x:17 DEL BRIENZA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-422-004 40368 168-91 .30017 CAROB ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-452-001 35024 6992:33705 MISTFLOWER CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-820-037 28801 45009 ALTISSIMO WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-440-005 340.33 c �OZ�2 �i X15054 FICUS ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-511-013 31023 "702$ ' ' ;34051 CORKTREE RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-320-019 39528 ;70?32 ` ,!15121 WINDOVERCT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-431-029 37857-101 ?32660 SANTA CRUZ WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-531-009 10880 ?7191 >642 QUAIL DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-381-040 29858 x71101 315171 WINDOVERCT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-431-034 31554 ''-7101=3602 EISENHOWER DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-315-026 32004 3'A 01.E =31662 CHAPARRAL WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-311-008 33011 F1}01 ''19865 PARKWOOD DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-523-004 33087 29348 GATEWAY DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-772-012 354837101 218940 APPLEWOOD WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-512-015 36670 EJ$0'1 ,=18935 DAKVIEWWAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-512-001 37670 Fi 01 LF45033 CARLA CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-040-027 31086 ;71 AO 135413 SADDLE HILL RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-862-002 1557 S(,f}} `;15143 TEAKWOOD ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 0 387-082-014 38067 6Ai 3541 LAKE CREST DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-292-039 4641 ;7164 +15170 WINDOVER CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-431-038 6314 }716A„ `32298 MACHADO ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-401-023 7032 73`.64".-1555 MORRO WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 381-331-009 7201271`4 32296 MACHADO ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 0 379-323-001 7401 11164,)9 BELLA CATERINA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-461-005 8128 '71.64 =33121 WINDWARD WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 381-354-011 9303 ;73.64 :31612 SADDLE RIDGE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-301-026 10022 171.84 16840 BELLAVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-255-045 10915 i7164�221 BROADWAY ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-344-004 12556 `-711.69 ;32685 CHERRYWOODLN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-473-007 12657 }7164 '1296 N WOODLAKE RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-242-006 13672 7168 :;33100 WINDWARD WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 381-355-001 14468 7i $A 31660 SADDLE RIDGE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-301-010 15140 %164 15127 KNOLLWOODST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-491-008 15627 7164 132164 MACHADOST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-360-062 15901 7.6} :15245 LAKETRAILCIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-503-027 16385 71sGQ L+371 AVENUE 11 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-114030 17986 a 71 64 1 32045 COTTAGE GLEN DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-702-007 21125 7154 ..� :'29426 FALLING LEAF DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-770-007 22760 s 7x169 z<29350 SCHOONER LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-562-011 27480 606,5 40965 WATERFORD ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-532-004 27681 71$4 s ..,,40 VILLA MILANO LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-392-017 27992 ti 7J. $ ;33137 LEEWARD WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 381-353-015 28549 1031 MEADOWLAKE LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-460-034 28653 350 AVENUE4 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-192-058 29396 15006 VISTA VIEW LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-382-013 3053821?�8 t y 32605 SAN LUCAS CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-541-013 30793;�s �. Nh 15108 TEAKWOOD ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-492-021 30903 �L 775 $ ° t x �s 31760 VIA VALDEZ LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-272-014 ,>,L t u 1 31249 F'�15 4 ": ,r� °s. s s � 19205 SANTA ROSA RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 346-050-007 31356 `$f)2 ,t ¢- `( y45001 SONIA DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 347-460-021 31364� 71�� �� '3 � � 29055 FIG WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-383-013 32290 � 71.,69 s .: .ti i 34088 AGALIYA CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-310-035 32597 '7U. 6$i E�a 16450 BRISTLECONE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-241-054 32667 3724 ASH ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-700"003 32690 ,ti3�.. �„16�� ., 3r 3'�i'��v 32013 SUGARBUSH LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-720-030 32944 [714, �., 5 �` LAURA LAKE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-412-020 15':331 s`=ya„'` 330681 f4 y. - x :15031 VALENCIA WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-392-004 3317119"`, eC �`�� n�Y253 S PENNSYLVANIA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-072-016 33368 sL.¢��4116 LARKSPURST 16�a47ad .N rs*�.�n LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-711-030 33407 ;�.. b8 �h -"+.:, Y� 15020 VISTA VIEW LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-394-001 34387 �1 �9 t z.7A� w�4 �299601LLIN015 ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 375-023-005 36645��.29562 TAILGATE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 371-332-006 36762 ;7164„ "t "+:{r 29565 TAILGATE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 371-331-010 36893 14801 HIDDEN LM CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 0 37374 `7r(,,'���i" 43040 BURNET ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347 -482-018 378334`14 4hk `su`�L 41027 CRIMSON PILLAR LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 347-501-003 38043?�1„68-. a,�z4D, `?. 29549 MASCOT ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 371-330-021 383881§,�'..,'? a'y s��-sa 53225 AMBRIDGEST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 349-511-013 38420 i`2�'S+x- L" �i n34234 LARKSBURG CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-250-014 38465 rur 53211 ICEBERG ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-530-004 390852164 z i ' 1�T'.�29138 EDGEWOOD DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-960-030 392333 G8 `' 1307 W SUMNER AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 0 374-091-016 392630„s sj'�{ t» 'L*-,�y��. 29205 CRESCENT RIDGE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-950-002 39346 P�1,4ai�t,�tii �3 33008 SEVILLE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-470-079 39675 :719 i lassi X3611 CHERRY BLOSSOM LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-372-005 39908 } 1fi4 Ts � ,214N LOWELL ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-141-004 �s 40166 J169 i L ',.!32003 SUGARBUSH LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-230-035 40264f64 i; .,41004 MARQUISE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-521-011 40362 371.64 EISENHOWER DR LAKE ELSINORE CA ,y #3808 92530 379-315-013 40617 °0/.§4 s 145017 ALTISSIMO WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-440-001 40734 ;,'1164 ~ "41025 CRIMSON PILLAR LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 347-501-002 40906 `1164 _ �eL $31657 CHAPARRAL WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-320-014 40959 "7164 ,16396 ORANGE BLOSSOM WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-444007 41016 2164 ''15495 SOLSTICE CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-760-010 41137 2164 t` .33150 LEEWARD WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 386-183-002 41139 i 32360 FERN LEAF DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-690-038 41374 71 (¢ ?34296 WOODMONT RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-921-074 41558 7364 , 36385 GERANIUM DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-110-023 41559 h71 b4 +.319 VILLA ROMA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-391-046 41708 164 338 AVENUE 5 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-193-040 41815 ,]164 {15730 SHADOW MTN LN LAKE ELSINORE CA92530 387-121-012 41845 71671 ;178 N CALIFORNIA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-333-012 41889 '71A4 '35426 OCOTILLOCT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-852-004 41573 X11.71; - , L-'7!900 LAKE MEADOW CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-292-055 40613 722{1 19 POINTE LOREN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-501-005 41235;153229 AMBRIDGEST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 349-511-015 29015 7224' 29169 GATEWAY DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-861-020 39335 35130 SORREL LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-390-051 358897290'i53027SWEET JULI ETT LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-561-003 41330 78;19.' '-X19515 PALOMARST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-530-013 39945 7318>32358 FERN LEAF DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-690-039 41167 732$ z�1113 MCKINLEYST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-311-010 39115 7350' !'34010 WINTERBERRY LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-810-015 16468 7413, `, >3266 FIG WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-412-003 26920 742$ J'�815 QUAIL DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-173-049 2465 7764 _ ¢29337 MARITIME CIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-593-004 40126 79$2 *,31866 WILLOW WOOD CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-652-026 13290 7993 x:131889 VINEWOODCT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-612-030 40057 8039;29 DEL BRIENZA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-411-004 23366 201)3 x:53223 FLUTTERBYEST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-513-030 26804 8128 32386 WINDEMERE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-681-016 32571 $142 ;323 E HEALD AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-034-023 17923 8593 331857 ST PIERRE LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-140-049 23813 $$ 93 30057 AUDELO ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-512-013 26495 8593 (29419 STAR RIDGE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-842-019 27315 $593x 3<51 PLAZAAVILA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-362-008 34414 §593 `°311 E HEALD AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-034-030 36850 8593 ;"=15160 TEAKWOODST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-483-008 42191 869G '?600 PARKVIEW DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-343-005 42257 9184 ` i f 34246 PARKSIDE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-231-016 42315 91t34x r +'30505 CANYON HILLS RD 9105 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-212-055 40439 �.�, 92 ?.29497 MASCOT ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 371-330-034 23066 98 2$ %"41117 PORTIA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 347-511-002 24268 193G 316431 ARNOLD AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-212-040 40533 982$ q53 CORTE MADERA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-383-005 13596 '94$9 .-:32535 BRAMBLE CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-582-018 16625 178 N CALIFORNIA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-333-012 23928 y¢ $9 1040 E LAKESHORE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-260-014 27448 94 $r9 =4114 POPLAR OR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-720-016 30459 9q $9 ¢1131 DAWES ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-202-009 33233 9489 y52991 ALBA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 349-600-012 37389 9489 ;E15062 HEATHER UN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-451-007 39076 9489 'L1012 DOLLY DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-361-021 30647 9G 649 34157 HILLSIDE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-380-001 12256 9G 94 , $15148 MIMOSA DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-472-008 28335 97 Y2 x '!15250 NORTH LAKE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-503-036 42167 9742 LC 30072 OLIVE GROVE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-523-030 21972 9790,""29320 GATEWAY DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-772-005 32336 96.53` '."41000 CRIMSON PILLAR LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-500-019 33467 '98 G9 "-.41117 ROYAL SUNSET RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-512-008 37529 2$ 90 `'.53230 COMPASSION WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-524-022 39833 99 B$ *70 VIA DE LA VALLE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-365-047 33357 300,00 ' :31752 CANYON ESTATES DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-291-005 37808 100.69 „ "129 PLAZA MODENA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-364-001 23169 101.26 45 VILLA MILANO LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-391-071 33048 '101:88, -`29047 AVOCADO WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-421-034 36655107;,8$ x 6 BELLA FIRENZE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-512-007 42155 102.33' {124 5 TORN RANCH RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-312-021 26885 104.08 " , :41045 CRIMSON PILLAR LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347480-003 25563 105.60 16461 BRISTLECONE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379 242-005 32519 105.60 }31780 VIA VALDEZ LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-272-008 25721 106,94 '^. 29276 POINT SHORE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-841-002 32402 110.93 34095 AGALIYA CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-310-007 35833 112.03 �... ;...-.11 CORTE ROSSA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-381-008 34335 9$?yi€2 $ 28250 GUTKAES AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 375-324-030 41877 x132 €;,' 581 ACACIA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-172-024 37963 1143D ;31750 MACHADO ST 4127 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-140-010 35460 111492 ?208 DAVIS ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-121-023 23463 11$9 t 29129 OUTRIGGER ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-482-011 33864 &Slip 41007 SEAFOAM CIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 347-494-017 40765 di.7t7` „' 32700 SANTA CRUZ WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-531-013 39952 t11,2� :_ '415 E HILL ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 377-311-015 40451 �,'}7 �$ rte - , ?2611/2 E PECK ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-041-016 13663 1'/7 30072 OLIVE GROVE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-523-030 38155 �`��77 � .ill CORTE MONTENA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-381-044 39797�'�i 4 :,',32925 SERENA WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 381-040-020 41528 1Y'r4&$_4, ,€v. `29 DEL BRIENZA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-011-004 42120 3Kb 89 4 ' s 53208 DARLINGTON ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-530-002 35900 }i`�-Q$�tt �€ ' •34027 CORKTREE RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-342-008 n 30864 €�k�" 35 1 L3 '' ;215 N LEWIS ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-131-026 �z 41952205 S MASSACHUSETTS ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-623-015 $ Q t P Y 4 n 37368 (1' ' '4035 ASH ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-681-004 40119 }A r T' 19460 PALOMAR CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-032-013 27335F��,A;s{€`,�;. 53114 TROPICAL ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-591-008 14575 R2�, tL zs- z :� 12 VILLA VALTELENA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-384-006 40997`x745001 ALTISSIMO WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-440-009 38894 1.4D€4 .54ttnt*� .34026 WINTERBERRY LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-810-023 rzx'a9'*{.,tt 27748 s?1��.�}T '�"� �:� ; €+.8115 COTTONWOOD CIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-711-020 38438ti"y € +1350 PARKWAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-207-007 zee t 411101t%t t' y v41108 PASCALI ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 347-550-042 40160°i$ v € -32770 ROYAL OAK LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-461-013 31014 8y v 3.€ }t 19997 CRESTWOOD DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-415-007 41388 �€rc si 4. f� -T z X11 CORTE ROSSA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-381-008 40693�,c 2'*�;€ x . 3 POINTE BIANCO LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-482-003 17840 4�4L € € E �� ;.`216 MATICH ST LAKE ELSINORE CA F z � ; at T 92530 374-112-021 169688"�$tv^` ��.. } `� txs .16524 NECTARINE WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-424-008 24039 ' 29 , €� ;.. i X40942 DIANA LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-540-007 26717 ':S"`Ba s�. �. ,.29033 STONERIDGE TER LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-454-009 a 30407-e`ge,,,�5.. 34142 CAMELINA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-351-002 31293,9�atit� fi,.a 1-a z`- 34086 AGALIYA CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-310-034 37851 s@3y,`C ;1e ('S F-32583 WILD FLOWER DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-730-057 39457 ��� �,{�"�€r€` 34017 WINTERBERRY LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-816007 41688 ';Yi9-s-�;,€_ LTi 1131 DAWESST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-202-009 39587=S$¢i3'4 z- € 32076 MEADOWWOODLN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-473-012 h 41019(����3' t` € 16531 SEDONAST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-470-038 41501182, .€t� 17 CORTE MONTENA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-381-042 6546 �I3�,€ € i 949 BARBARA WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-360-027 38886,.^@€t x�Lk 514027 ASH ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-681-005 74659J94��' cr 30001 NORTH LAKE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-503-001 4021134Q 82€ € < 206 N CALIFORNIA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-051-010 415854b`$ a € =15304 REGATTA WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-483-011 40784 (f3�'77 z. X34283 LUPINE CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-800-024 6409 F34Dnt r s is 129456 MARINERS WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-630-026 37765A1 S9 € :34226 LARKSBURG CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-250-010 27200 ;14392-.. 230 AVENUE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-206-003 28140 :34289 -41011 MARQUISE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-520-006 30689 a1$6S " .29251 SPECTRA DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-872-006 30883 4120 COTTONWOOD CIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-711-003 33129 16428 GUNNERSON ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-244-016 37657 ;14268 ',33125 LEEWARD WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 381-353-012 37835}42 88 .129054 NAVEL CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-391-012 26498 i342TJ3 135 N WOODLAKE RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-270-014 31357 14293 ,;45014 CARLA CT LAKE ELSINORE CA -44092530 347-024 7840 x.4296, 'r 409N ELLIS ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 377-281-011 24906A3.04 `.34298 CHAPAROSSA DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-272-004 612 ;74328', !16500 STODDARDST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-201-013 7841 '34328 "=31750 VIA VALDEZ LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-272-019 8786 '143.Z$ '-. 29245 NORTHP0INTE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-471-005 13348 143,28 ' `31925 MANZANITA LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-612-014 14363 ?1,43,3$: ':L31904 BIRCHWOOD DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-651-013 15467 '1432$ ;" x=31870 WILLOW WOOD CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-652-024 17261 '14328 '!29550 HURSH ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-312-035 18288 X14328`,? 15498 STARVIEW ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-762-013 20231 ;143 ^�8, '529328 MARITIME CIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-593-001 21703 41024 SUNSPRITE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 347-494-002 25576 }7.492$`" ,29205 SANDPIPER DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-572-009 27510 1113 BUCHANAN ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-323-033 28123 'Y7ti$4 X30420 WILSON ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-314-020 28187 ;34328 r` ;939 BARBARA WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-360-028 29046 x t ;143"2$ :15133 VERSAILLES ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-062-012 29659 x.43$ �� :, -33510 CEDAR CREEK LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-690-004 30505 1433$ S " ^31946 CEDARHILL LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-590-008 31024 29272 CRYSTAL RIDGE CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-872-015 31049 I43'd8 x "- X15016 VISTA VIEW LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-382-018 31147 ,1432$', sf ?1001 W HEALD AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-131-021 31214 =34328 Lr `' X16927 BELLAVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-261-019 32509 ..1432$ ` '141103 PORTIA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 347-511-009 33195 =14328 >: 245 LAURELWOOD LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-341-004 33375 �* 3433$ t ',40943 WHITEHALLST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 347-540-036 33435 ;432$ '`25 VOLTA DELTINTORI LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-770-002 34216 31956 FLOWERHILL DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-621-025 34280 i�3 28 .��� �t L .34112 SILK TASSEL LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 358-381-010 35109 r (1432$ t '.'32564 MACHADO ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-003-023 ,,� 35423 ;X49 28"" xx 5,� `35530 DESERT ROSE WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-860-005 35485 zrti %33.$1` -`' s`"h4127 LARKSPURST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-712-014 36007 ;14,9 �$ ti� � r CRIMSON PILLAR LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 347-500-018 36582 x41002 . :143?,$ a k45005 CARLA CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-440-041 ,a" a ``x18939 92532 377-380-022 37203 :1492$r i"r L` �1x�1 S``� CONARD AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 37793c r;. 149`2$ S ;. 1 e,' 29459 ROCK POINT DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-780-008 r�,-. 38371 _3492rg t7 15171 CAMPHOR WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-461-009 38442 --`�'32$yr'`L9'rvh`°30204 WILSON ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-314-019 38641 L AO ���2i §ax �3¢ ��:r3361 FIR CIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-691-005 39126 `14328 'r` & t1 xT x.34315 CHAPAROSSA DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-280-005 39593 1483 �,� � CHICORY CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-833-012 39724 Lam-135405 35328 TRAILSIDE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-852-023 39781 J43 3$ ' "31633 CANYON ESTATES DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-263-014 39953 x k143x2 } ANABELLE LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 347-453-024 ,L345005 40319 1433$ x .:#3449 APPLE BLOSSOM LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-365-009 40774 61 PLAZA AVILA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-365-055 4091212G`7Q2'oS �"s 8553007 ALBA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-610-006 26491 ;.a 34 91'�� '� i x31728 CANYON ESTATES DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-275-008 41438 i 41015 MARQUISE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-520-008 27702 A593 ` s - 54130 POPLARCIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-720-008 36055 _`34598xx r i 29082 PALM VIEW 55 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-382-007 41447 '15Q 35_� s ;55 VOLTA DELTINTORI LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-781-008 39877 351 A9 i '30400 MORTON AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 375-321-OS8 31839 35492., .x=32355 FERN LEAF DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-690-029 41783 115571 ,,534181 NANDINAST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-351-020 10435 <Si15.9$ ','?32465 CAPE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-414-017 37006 36033 ,` X2689 GOLDEN CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 381-332-004 37226 36305 "18872 WELCH DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 377-391-016 40792 00 PARKVIEW DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-343-005 32392 16491"s '`=206 N CALIFORNIA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-051-010 39254 15492 ' '19690 BERRYWOOD DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-520-007 40896 18492 1321 DAWESST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-207-012 37281`:31948 GLOXINIA WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-571-023 33194 166.94`• '.15513 STARVIEW S5 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-761-007 38421 1fiRi6 133116 WINDWARD WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 381-355-005 31752 1578Q ;31750 MACHADO ST 189 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 009-706-176 31753 157 $D '31750 MACHADOST 1141 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-140-010 41445 1E$3A „ 127 BELLA DONACI LAKE ELSINORE CA 92595 363-511-014 32725 98$38.32635 SAN NICHOLAS LAKE ELSINORE CA92530 370-530-046 4651 171 ,-'31750 MACHADO ST N45 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 009-717-182 22965 1982551LVERWOOD DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-521-017 31137 ;17160. 3500 EISENHOWER DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-315-032 41709 =�926Q, L19865 PARKWOODDR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-523-004 41270 ;,1i4Oty <<3607 LINNET DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-173-025 35619 eli7gQ� 16526 BADALONAST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-470-023 33287 1377 S2 ,`x2689 QUAIL KNOLL RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 381-331-014 36451 i1T�,Q !19370 OAKVIEW LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-484-004 17893 %?78586` .i 320281RONBARKCT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-701-009 33483 x,9885 .�=29382 GUNDER AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-192-036 28493'?7?$92 29454 PALLING LEAF DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-770-014 41504 1Y79T 47 ' 53213 ICEBERG ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-530-005 41507 �99 q'j ,',53237 CHAMPL4IN ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-523-013 29702, 53116 TROPICAL ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-591-007 26781-94 ` :29950 REIDST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 375-024-091 41336 {1831$ '' 1 29224 SANDPIPER DR c 1 X h 1 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-573-004 37440$.$ C 23$ :15009 NAVEL WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-384-023 30350 f�>}'Bi�q� a ,;15518 STARVIEW ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-762-008 35624a$3E6 �„ z L53241 COMPASSION WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-531-004 29673 x1.$14 PORTIAST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 347-511-011 34328 L,.41102 *9$42$,. `?:34038 CORKTREE RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-341-034 22837 53194 MONACO ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-513-011 29163 yA$,�9$> . �� '17866 LASH ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-263-016 30608859' ,1.318 AVENUE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-192-030 30939 E9 -, rti t X407 GRANITE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 377-283-015 31507 .17370 MC BRIDE AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-154-014 35348 �. 5,84 `� �' 13810 ADAMS ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-322-025 35382 385^4$ „34023 CORKTREE RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-342-010 36201 98 ;.33562 CEDAR CREEK LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-820-054 36457 21007 HIGH CREST DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-273-013 38079 sips x�$' r ` LOVITTCIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-752-025 38121 x84144 §93s 1 '18051 W SUMNER AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 375-342-022 26442 21082 KIMBERLY CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-341-012 26926 Imo' 4B, L 153272 COLETTEST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-522-006 4126286087 ; � "' r '-29320 GATEWAY DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-772-005 12580 15 PONTE NEGRA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-503-019 30735 34128 CAMELINAST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-372-010 40226 �2QQ39 ' 29313 STILLWATER CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-571-007 23637 �>34 r' T ;282 MORONI AVE A LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-043-009 251622(�F $8# t '' �� L34084 LADY FERN CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 358-321-008 36854 ;"2O5r4�4 ; ' 29542 MAJOR LEAGUE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 371-330-009 2528 173 S NEBRASKA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-323-004 39092 1708¢4?45001 ANABELLE LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-453-022 24621 :21098 ,.`30037 SUGARPINE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-492-016 270572jj, 92 1821 CANARY CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-174-059 38609 ?24871131935 HONEYSUCKLE CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-230-023 30889 i2?384 '_'34146 HILLSIDE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-382-007 33911 :21422 `28675 FERNGLENCIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 359-672-027 23780 21429 :35428 COYOTE CREEK CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-862-016 32242 ?214 ,9 53198 MONACO ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-513-013 19865 2.3429 ..:32465 SKYLARK DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-434-024 33388 21429 .,`75 VILLA VALTELENA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-391-027 18561A 92 -,:5804 SOLANO CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-621-002 5129 414,92 C,,+15212 GOLDEN SANDS ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-601-011 8382 41492. :15176 IRONWOODST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-461-014 9354 21,492 5 VILLA MILANO LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-391-071 10110 21492 - 1.31516 SAGGCREST DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-332-016 14479 214,92 ',29212 NORTHPOINTEST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-465-005 19352 21482 - Y .X991 AMBER LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-292-002 25863 21492 -, `=31740 CANYON ESTATES DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-291-002 26247 21462 '40972 BANKHALLST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-550-022 26387 X21482 `.`4117 COTTONWOOD CIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-711-021 26393 -21492 ,' X31784 INDIAN SPRING RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-283-012 26541 21492 > x225 BROADWAY ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-344-002 27267 g 46 VILLA MILANO LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-392-020 27303 2,492 "34163 CAMELINAST LAKE. ELSINORE CA 92532 358-350-002 28651 210.82 34256 DEERGRASS WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-251-007 28919 901 DIANE WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-361-035 29078 21492 :i 34284 BLOSSOMS DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-800-029 30027 21482 47 VIA DE LA VALLE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-365-018 32179 21432 e :35575 DESERT ROSE WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-832-007 32354 21q ,92 %33500 CEDAR CREEK LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-690-047 33108 2{1A�62N LOWELL ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-033-013 33463 ,+;,409 X4`9#^ ' .-34282 LUPINE CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-800-019 34208 0.492>i" cx. :53215 WASSON CANYON RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-532-002 34390 ;,'20.'8" T ; T '� SILKTASSEL RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-380-040 34412 ,34117 :12312`K "' s �'`'z N LANGSTAFF ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-061-006 34432 �'L410 ��, ` x}c 32044 BAYWOOD ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-573-007 34676 X148'2 x1�A �� s ,;31724 CANYON RIDGE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-281-003 30.708 ,�` 234x82 -.'31973 SUGARBUSH LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-630-034 34720111 i =29260 CRYSTAL RIDGE CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-872-018 35724 53018 ASTRID WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-561-030 35880 x X14''2 ".:'; 24 VILLAVALTELENA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-384-012 35930 ,'$ [ i's`5 c 4L 5ti _31927 ROSEWOODCT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-021-007 36926 yy) x� t�233 OHIO ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-242-025 37829 ^2iA�2,�',-z w ei' 29557 MASCOTST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 371-332-002 38713'4�222a'`.. -,} 213 T0WNSEND ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-112-011 39638 sL �``" tea° '`£x`535115 FENNEL LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-390-003 40088342s rk x 4� 29139 OUTRIGGER ST ? T', L` LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-0.63-001 40316ii,``��, xiS '�-x'. s 'C34190 PINNATACT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-331-003 40453 142 ExG X3531 ASH Sl LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-412-010 31261�y�xp�9LL L L tik x ' :3357 FERN CIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-691-030 41128 x`�`M1 Sx�`'�,-0:,`E' 45007 STARINA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-450-029 40877 xyr$,�K"u L T "TtF*`14103 POPLAR CIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-720-053 31382 219"{`, 189100AKVIEW WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-511-037 34678 .�sx 2,'4TQ7"s� ' 'L-� �4. 29043 STONERIDGE TER LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-454-004 40895 31771 VIA VERDE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-281-005 40337 227,8�"�� �� '34241 TOYONCT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-250-035 32120 2�pz Eq� L vi 31750 MACHADO ST 143 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 009-715-036 40145 22$92` `' ` 30505 CANYON HILLS RD 42602 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-213-025 6356 2 29 ' x"' ,,5223 CHANEYST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 375-345-032 8445 2.838k c �� ^16769 HUNTAVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-263-002 4x ;.'tz` t*``16875 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-254-048 37100 9,�4'4y�x e PIERROT AVE 40807 z ti' 406 W HEALD AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-154-010 12078 15074 AM0ROSE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-522-004 18343 -2S}9t -; 'L z :'"32033 BAYWOOD ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-572-007 39425 31544 CANYON VIEW DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-331-010 35358 33684" 35558 DESERT ROSE WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-831-012 40840 X4$42 "30505 CANYON HILLS RD 11104 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-211-030 40068 2507 x `43 DEL PIZZOU LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-413-006 40243 25462 P29480 VILLAGE PKWY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 371-333-011 2641 25598 ` >208 BEACHWOOD LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-232-019 23101 _ -25533 ".� 15336 SPYGLASS DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-4484-001 40756 25746 .642 QUAIL DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-381-040 25260 2fi095 �j 34176 HILLSIDE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-302-010 36640 26203 '%.1130 MCKINLEYST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-312-015 40326 264 SE ,' ",16537 STEVENSST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-223-082 35570 24$64 131 DEL BRIENZA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-411-005 36065 265,93: ",17333 MCBRIDEAVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-156-092 31890 12$.36 "30505 CANYON HILLS RD 112301 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-213-011 40256 3fi632�s 15413 LANTERN HILL LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-642-004 39794 2b944 �; '" ":264 WHITE OAK RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-410-011 25064 27(1`78. i 3311 CAMPUS WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-092-013 35216 27329 is 201 N NEBRASKA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-051-018 24258 28194 `,±53031 CRESSIDAST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 349-550-015 8955 2$591 .`19335 SWEETWOODCT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-351-020 901 20000 ? 415 N SCRIVENER ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-032-011 1096 2$53 ,'112 N LANGSTAFF ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-171-006 2551 2$593 x,•16517 MCPHERSON AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-203-064 2871 2$593 1335 PENNSYLVANIA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-312-003 2970 2$593 15168 VERSAILLES ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-533-010 4248 2&593 < ;17322 SHRIER DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-156-085 5474 28598 `2729 GOLDEN CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 381-332-001 6113 285,93 < x x234 WHITE OAK RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 359-342-005 l X388 7615 28593 AVENUE 3 LAKE ELSINORE CA 0 373-191-031 8247 28593 '"15018 NAVEL WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-385-012 8702 2,593 z.� X31758 VIA VALDEZ LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-272-015 9898 2$5;,99 �; i7 CORTE RIVERA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-382-019 10032 r 73 64 L^ 4?31633 RIDGECREST DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-301-009 11405 Lr `15601 SHADOW MTN LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-122-014 12578 ,28932 ` y 285,93 L j -� i X31749 CANYON RIDGE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-282-020 12619 285 93 r y-31930 MANZANITA LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-602-032 13515 28593 K 715124 KNOLLWOOD ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-482-005 14056 2$593, rr Y r, 33142 WINDWARD WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 351-355-011 r;. 14285 ,2$S 93 ':'3611 LAKE CREST DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-292-032 14467 =28593 11 PONTE CHIARA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 349-492-002 14938 r 1409 W HEALD AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-113-018 16527 }2593 f ._ 4' j .16601 MCPHERSON AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-203-059 16606 j�,593 N�7� 1 � �7 '32029 POPPY WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-472-035 17003 a x,$¢93 �' i t -, 14 PLAZA AVILA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-361-045 17247 t2$§99 i1 T' !+ FSS ?{33166 SHORELINE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 386-182-006 17619 =2$593 c"\ x.29166 SUNSWEPT DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-740-029 17632 ;25993 w z ��'+ 5 °15533 STARVIEWST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-761-012 18305 t2$S 93 �. 1' 'fl-"� X30650 DRYDEN ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-320-016 18592 ':2 5243 q ;,�-�,r '"413 N MAIN ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-063-012 18633 .. .. c`i t ,2§$93 u i ,�-`.. 15136 MAHOGANY WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-481-016 18664 :2859$ ''4111/2 N MAIN ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-063-012 18739 l }2959'j r L: 3691 LINNET DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-173-065 18982 31919 CYPRESS GLEN CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-602-039 19542 "2$$Q$ ',',� "9 DELTORINO LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-402-005 20139 72$593 s21 CORTE RIVERA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-382-028 21186 42$593 :- � `29052 FOREST VIEW LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-391-004 21263 X8$93 s c ` '3354 FERN CIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-691-013 21676 '285 �3 i �. " 41025 SUNSPRITE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 347-493-013 21695" Sys hZT41032 SUNSPRITEST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 347-492-003 21714 325593 �r >'-701 W GRAHAM AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-142-024 21807 X2$595 • L ;41015 CRIMSON PILLAR LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-500-008 22159 ;2,$593 729336 GATEWAY DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-772-001 22308 E$S 93 - :19745 SILVERWOOD DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-521-025 22406 '28593 ,15537 STARVIEWST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-761-013 22471 l'28593 <15058 DAN I ELLE WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-452-019 22857 X5593 ';� 53239 AMBRIDGE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 349-511-020 22937 2$593 '16658 JOY ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-191-007 2295516628 ESCAVERAST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-470-004 23007 2$593„ 34272 DEERGRASS WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-2.51-017 23060 285.93 :,'15140 WAVECREST DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-431-020 23081 2$5,98'-, 53222 BEALESST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-520-007 23384 2$5,93' 116517 SEDONAST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-470-031 23747 '2$59$ '3502 EISENHOWER DR LAKE ELSINORE CA92535 379-315-031 2411753087 MEMORIALST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-580-021 24374 2$5 93 ,'.40987 DIANA LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-533-012 24467 2$593�, , ,'.40946 DIANA LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-540-005 24531 24725 24803 24870 25171 25213 25223 25320 25390 25574 25599 25728 25819 25937 25995 26422 26448 26472 26620 26646 26698 26845 27204 27560 27781 27996 28031 28102 28164 28181 28578 29147 29167 29191 29335 29357 29359 29370 29452 29487 29502 29560 29597 29638 29790 30119 30124 30141 30171 30261 30286 30401 30412 30484 30553 30599 30633 30908 31099 31139 31173 31183 MARIA CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-530-023 UTA DELTINTORI LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-770-007 SAN LUCAS Cl LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-541-017 GALLICA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-560-022 MEMORIAL ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-580-004 LADY FERN CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 358-321-011 HOLLYHOCK ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-563-005 CANYON HILLS RD 41901 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-211-038 GALLICA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-560-023 GALLICA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-571-011 BANTRY BAY ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-562-007 CLEMENT ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-250-029 VERSAILLES ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-531-018 BOULDER VISTA DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-302-027 SPRUCE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-361-001 MILL ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-094-003 FERN LEAF DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-690-026 BOULDER VISTA DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-302-025 COPPARO LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-421-045 LRTE MADERA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-381-075 ORIN DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-171-079 SAN JOSE CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-541-032 'GRAHAM AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-242-001 AURORA CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-791-018 LINCOLN ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-272-011 NORTH LAKE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-542-007 BANYON CIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-701-001 SONIA OR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 347-470-006 COYOTE CREEK CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-862-031 CANYON RIM RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-801-008 WOODLAKE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-073-015 AKE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-182-027 ILLINOIS ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 375-023-058 CRIMSON PILLAR LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 347-502-004 SUGARPINE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-491-016 POPLAR CIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-720-013 WASHINGTON AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-061-008 BRONZE STAR RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-453-021 SANTA CRUZ WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-531-008 GATEWAY DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-871-005 ROOSEVELT DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-322-022 JUNIPER CIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-691-051 HEALD AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-182-008 DIANA LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-540-008 MEADOWLAKE LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-460-029 RALPH RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-311-021 RAVEN DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-174-032 SONIA DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 347-470-010 SHORELINE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 381-352-010 OAK KNOLL LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-484-009 MACHADO ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-443-003 N HEALD AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-112-015 FIORE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-421-034 AVOCADO WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-421-030 WASHINGTON AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-624-010 STONERIDGE TER LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-454-010 LASH ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-263-032 WINTERBERRY LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-820-012 VIA VALDEZ LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-272-024 ESCAVERA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-470-005 SUNDEW CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-380-012 IAURELLN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-441-002 31225 2$5 ^15085 HAYDEN CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 387-512-008 31253 15011 VALENCIA WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-385-007 31291 28593 .,': ,--;29205 STARBOARD CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-651-007 31332 4$S 93 j19810 OLD COACH RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-531-002 31340 27A,Q1 (30216 BAUM AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 375-322-038 31395 x$59$ ;:30224 BAUM AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 375-322""039 31736 20 CORTE RIVERA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-370-005 31974 <28593 y < :33038 CANOPY LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-710-014 32014 2$59;', 30275 WILSON ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-313-009 32215 7i 69 +"� 140941 CARNEGIECIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-541-024 32425 ;!.$193 Y "s, 1401 W SUMNER DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-102-012 32492 ,2$Q3 REGATTA WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-642-018 32730`993 +",15420 ` X;32078 POPPY WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-561-004 32819 2855 , 1 �, ` '40925 WHITEHALLST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 347-540-027 32848 2QTy'$� L ,'1495 MORRO WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 381-331-003 32901269 ^- e `31778 VIA VALDEZ LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-272-007 32981 }�Q�S��< � +F `` ��32600 SANTA CRUZ WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-530-042 33284 1131 MONROE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-314-025 33315 2$Sz9, .�' 29409 SUN HARBOR CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-571-023 33339 sin 365x.5-' 2 - ("•135006 BAZAST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-470-021 33370 + $2$5 �6.'S'T „ X33120 TRABUCO DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 381-361-026 335122$"~96 cc;� 'z 26 VILLA VALTELENA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-384-013 33522cP�3 ; L �,,34325 CHAPAROSSA DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358280010 33576 , ,-T'8593 + ` <` < 15164 ANCHOR WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 381-351-009 33618 QUAIL05 33621$'96 *u wV 11 `z r Li 34123 S AILKTASSEL RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-380-037 336852$513 *fit i +" 4z 232360 OAKVI EW WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-511-050 33866 h +.,ex+, 'E 1C��'E: �2, 59$LC L+�. h �" 34118 SILKTA55EL RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-381-013 33977 4K €6a9't` ": f { qJ iii 3314 BANYON CIE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-701-003 34021$" sL}L -+. 15205 WINDJAMMER WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-561-011 34218'E ; {`L;� 30505 CANYON HILLS RD#902 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-211-019 30.381 Y 30.293 HICKORY LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-803-003 34397Q$<, ,."''�� 34028 CORKTREE RD LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-341-029 344812$$ < `': a X32180 DEBERA DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-453-023 34525 X96, >y�tl'� „ '+"„ b+32490 BEECHWOOD LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-434-008 34563 [385y6+ i 2..,zr,.,+" 31771 CANYON RIDGE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-282-016 34629 E2$S� {.:-53009 BELLE ISIS CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 349-541-011 34709 �368�1 `+ ", str!, "'stk;' 1745 MASSACHUSETTS ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-321-020 34722 ;N96st��° +h 7'`+"34093 DIANTHUS LIN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 358-340-027 34850 X85 Aka .3361 FERN CIR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-691-028 34967 + _.,. ;259$;.;�,<,C -_ z ` < t ---2669 GOLDEN CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 381-332-006 35163 2$§9$' „ �5 BELLAALIZA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92587 363-513-009 35243 v t,``2,,$$�3" ,� � i 'il +- '45005 CORNELIA CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 347-453-011 35342 �h ``�+�i4 ii ;29260 POINT SHORE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-860-003 35592 -'',26593,, t�,? +r y < X41093 HATTON GARDEN CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-550-035 35620 %�5537� + z645 QUAIL DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-382-015 35708 ;;2$593 1 ;33105 SHORELINE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 381-352-002 35745 x$5,99 `•rv8 DEL SANTELLO LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-414-004 36058859 t `'�+ 29291 CATCHERS WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 371-310-019 36066 + x$$"9'3 a69 VILLA VALTELENA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-391-030 36288 !2$$95 r < 1901 BROADWAY ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-464-027 36337x6593 .=.30505 CANYON HILLS RD #1501 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-212-033 36415 g ;2859$ r 172 S MASSACHUSETTS ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-331-021 36470 x$593 :771 VILLAVALTELENA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-391-029 36487 '28599 ,x522 QUAIL DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-381-048 36771 28593 j29038 MANGO CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-422-019 36804 31655 SUNDANCE WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-313-012 3680753221 COMPASSION WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-531-014 36913 X8595 ".(29049 STONERIDGE TER LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-454-001 37041 ,28593 129279 AUBURN DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-952-003 37146 38594 ,' }29265 3RDST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 377-380-008 37173 285,93 , x29083 ALLAN ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 377-392-004 37175 285193 i 29101 ALLAN ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 377-392-002 37185 28$,93 29161 ALLAN ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 377-404-006 37195 285.93 229247 ALLAN ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 377-404-001 37202 ;285.93' '- 18937 CONARD AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 377-380-021 37359 .28893 X3804 ASH ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-700-013 37388 134287 DEERGRASS WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-250-063 37441 ;28$93 ,.?17452 DEBRASKAVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-134-007 37929 285,93 ,,35411 COYOTE CREEK CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-862-025 38225 ;285.93 -!29406 BATTERS BOH LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 371-311-013 38369 285.93, ' ,28557 MEADOW BROOK CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-672-011 35710;285.3, ` X36240 PURSH DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 358-580-006 38739 2{35,93,y939 .s BARBARA WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379360-028 39190 iZ859& -`739 PLAZA AVILA LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-362-002 39607 �"41010 CHAMBORD ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 347-521003 39619 AVENUE 12 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-115-012 36366 2859A'+ 17599 SUNNYSLOPE AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 375-201-045 39954 29A 33 :,32167 MICHELE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-453-001 40425 X9828 '1'4521 LARKSPUR ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-712-015 37262 30093` !23086 CREEKSIDE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 363-313-001 34300 ,30543 ;y52980 ALBA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 349-600-006 39657 3D543 _'3�53015 SWEET JULIETT LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-561-009 41127 '3Q626 1 VILLA SCENCERO LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-471-009 29139 15056 CHRISTINA CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-442-033 35222 =3 ,593 1-30505 CANYON HILLS RD #1601 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-212-039 3611 3388D - 15184 LINCOLN ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-173-005 34954 ;31880 ;15157 VERSAILLES ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-531-021 36128 316 $D x29221 GATEWAY DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 391-870-009 36293 133,8$0 '.15042 ZIEGLINDE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-391-006 40048 131705 �� `1709 W HEALD AVE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-141-016 40099 _32739 - $3141/2 N LINDSAY ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 374-053-004 37890 341 $D '; 16480 BAILEY ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-213-042 40002 134433 X1126 CLEVELAND CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-313-013 4 `3258 ;j29109 SUNSWEPTDR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-502-003 34614 141771 _ x:31508 STONEY CREEK DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-333-014 28760 =4149 ,L 32345 ROCK ROSE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-722-009 30981 ;42,1$2 / 453004 SWEET IULIETT LN LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-560-005 33527 '-423<32 „300 DATE ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 389-412-032 33547 16 VIA PALMIEKI CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-760-007 33595 :4$�12f35421 OCOTILLO CT LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 363-852-017 35044 -421,32 'x':783 ACACIA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-181-011 35656:42132 '53239 BONICAST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-524-009 35911 x42132 '53221 RUGOSA ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92532 349-533-001 36545 '43632 715038 ZIEGLINDE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 379-391-007 40916 A9479 =32630 SANTA CRUZ WAY LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 370-530-039 2733170725 ?30181 RIVERSIDE DR LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 378-272-043 27978 1192.8D_. _. ��'..> - . 190 ELM ST LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 373-222-004 $ 125,695.94 Agenda Date: 7/14/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 9) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 15-670 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 71912015 Lake Update & Outreach — Lake Watch 2015 July 14, 2015 Page 2 Fiscal Impact None Prepared by: Nicole Dailey, Management Analyst Approved by: Grant Yates, City Manager Lake Update & Outreach — Lake Watch 2015 July 14, 2015 Page 2 were modest. The last major fish kill occurred in 1998 when more than 30 million, or 240 tons, of shad had to be removed from the lake. LESJWA, a joint powers authority, and the City developed and implemented comprehensive, long-term strategies for improving water quality at Lake Elsinore. These projects have included lake -mixing fans and diffused aeration lines to improve oxygen levels , a recycled water pipeline to add up to five million gallons of recycled water to the lake every day, groundwater wells in the back basin to also help stabilize lake levels and fishery management programs such as fish stocking to improve the fisheries. Regardless of these efforts, though, Lake Elsinore is a natural, freshwater lake that requires an adequate stream of fresh water, stable water levels and a balanced fishery for optimal health. Discussion Dr. Anderson, who has studied Lake Elsinore for many years, is expected to provide a brief overview regarding the findings from the fish population survey and other observations regarding the condition of Lake Elsinore. In addition, City staff will outline the proposed plan for Lake Watch 2015. This outreach effort is focused on the City preparing, planning and proactively addressing the lake's condition among the community and regional agencies. This includes working with these agencies to explore alternatives to improve the balance of our fishery, such as removing shad from the lake, and developing a comprehensive contingency action plan that will allow us to leverage our resources quickly and effectively in the event of a fish kill. Other efforts include the development of outreach tools to promote Lake Watch 2015. Community presentations, notices to property owners around the lake, media briefings, billboard postings and social media promotions will be used to inform our residents, businesses and stakeholders about the City and LESJWA's plans to prepare and proactively address the vulnerability of the lake. Lake Watch 2015 seeks to engage the community to learn more about the lake, its ecology and encourage support of the City's efforts. Finally, during last summer amidst concerns about oxygen levels, the City Council approved Free Boating Days on Wednesdays and Sundays for eight weeks in August and September. Staff is considering this option again to increase activity on the lake and potentially improve dissolved oxygen levels. Lake Watch 2015 demonstrates the City's commitment to doing what it can this year and in future years to consistently monitor, maintain and improve its most valuable asset — Lake Elsinore. CITY OF LADE LLSIf10R,E `� DREAM Exl'REME,. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Grant Yates, City Manager DATE: July 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Lake Update & Outreach —Lake Watch 2015 Recommendation Discuss, review and approve the proposed Lake Watch 2015 to educate, engage and inform the community about Lake Elsinore. Background Lake Elsinore is Southern California's largest natural, freshwater lake with more than 3,000 surface acres and 14 miles of shoreline. However, as a natural lake it is reliant on rain and runoff from the Lake Elsinore and San Jacinto Watersheds. Last year was the 7th driest year on record and the drought has continued to worsen. Ninety-four percent (94%) of the State is in severe, extreme or exceptional drought. As a result, the lake level has fallen to approximately 1236 -feet above sea level which is well below the optimal level of 1240 -feet. In addition, temperatures are on the rise as we enter the hottest months of the year. In April, Dr. Michael Anderson conducted a fish population survey for Lake Elsinore on behalf of the Lake Elsinore & San Jacinto Watershed Authority (LESJWA). The initial findings from this study have noted a significant increase of the Threadfin Shad population in the lake. An excessive number of Shad can be detrimental to the lake's water quality. Shad, which are tiny fish, hinder the water quality by eating large bodied microscopic zooplankton, which are needed to consume algae. This imbalance can greatly increase the likelihood of algae blooms and further deplete the lake's oxygen levels. The combination of fluctuations in the weather, increasing temperatures during the day and night, low water levels, larger algae blooms and the overabundance of Shad, has raised concerns about the lake's vulnerability and the potential for a fish kill in the months ahead. Lake Elsinore faced fish kills for many decades until the completion of the Lake Management Project aimed at stabilizing lake levels, the creation of LESJWA and the promotion of water quality improvements and strategies. The most recent fish kills in 2009 CITY LADE jLSINORE VM DREAM EXTREME. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Grant Yates, City Manager DATE: July 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2015-1341 relating to The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordinance No. 2015 -1341 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN by roll call vote. Discussion On June 23, 2015, this ordinance was introduced to approve the Amendment to previously approved The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and is now being brought back for adoption. Prepared by: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk Approved by: Grant Yates, City Manager Attachment: Ordinance No. 2015-1341 The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1341 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE VILLAGES AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, Peter M. Olah, has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of amendments to the previously approved The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan No. 2015-01 (Specific Plan Amendment No. 2014-02) proposing a single- family detached condominium project and building designs for 163 detached condominiums and related improvements located at the northwest corner of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive (Assessor Parcel Numbers 379-050-006, 379-050-034, 387- 170-004, 387-170-006, 387-180-001, 387-080-003, and 387-080-004); and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65453(a) states that a specific plan shall be amended in the same manner as a general plan, except that a specific plan may be adopted by resolution or by ordinance and may be amended as often as deemed necessary by the legislative body; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph A of LEMC Section 17.204.130 (SPD Specific Plan District) the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the approval or denial of specific plans subject to specified modifications and conditions; and WHEREAS, on May 5, 2015 at a duly noticed public hearing the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties and adopted Resolution No. 2015-41 recommending City Council approval of Amendment No. 1 to The Village at Lakeshore Plan: and WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph B of LEMC Section 17.204.130 (SPD Specific Plan District) the City Council has the authority to approve, approve with modifications or conditions, or deny the final specific plan; and WHEREAS, on June 23, 2015 at a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council has reviewed and analyzed the proposed specific plan amendment pursuant to the California Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §65000 et seq.), the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and finds and determines that the proposed specific plan amendment is consistent with the requirements of California Planning and Zoning Law and with the goals and policies of the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1341 PAGE 2 of 4 SECTION 2. The City Council finds and determines that the combined mitigation measures included in Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 2006-05 (State Clearinghouse No. 2006017027) and Addendum #1 to the MND adequately reduce any potential significant impacts to levels of less than significant impacts, thus no additional environmental analysis is warranted. SECTION 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Laws and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan No. 2005-01 (SPA 2014-02): 1. The location and design of the proposed development shall be consistent with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan and with any other applicable plan or policies adopted by the City. Amendment No. 1 to the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan meets the City's Specific Plan criteria for content and required implementation of the General Plan established by Section 65450 et sea. of the California Government Code and Section 17.204 of the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. Accordingly, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment complies with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. The proposed location shall allow the development to be well -integrated with or adequately buffered from its surroundings, whichever may be the case. The proposed detached single-family residential dwelling units as described by the proposed amended Specific Plan provide residential development with that is consistent with the previously developed adjacent areas. 3. All vehicular traffic generated by the development, either in phased increments or at full build -out, is to be accommodated safely and without causing undue congestion upon adjoining streets. The width and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic that will be generated due to implementation of Amendment No. 1 of the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan has been reviewed and accounted for. The City has conditioned the Project to be served by roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car, truck, transit and bicycle. 4. Amendment No. 1 of the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan identifies methodology(s) to allow land uses to be adequately serviced by existing or proposed public facilities and services. In appropriate circumstances, and as provided elsewhere by the Municipal Code, the City may require that suitable areas be reserved for schools, parks and pedestrian ways; or public open spaces shall be dedicated or reserved by private covenant for the common use of residents, establishments or operations in the development. ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1341 PAGE 3 of 4 The Amendment No. 1 to the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan identifies necessary streets and circulation to support the proposed land use allocations, as well as all necessary wet and dry utilities for proper and adequate infrastructure services. The applicant/developer shall develop adequate internal recreational facilities and pay in -lieu fees that will offset any impacts to the community. 5. The overall design of Amendment No. 1 to the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan No. 2005-01 (SPA 2014-02) will produce an attractive, efficient and stable development. All applicable City Departments and Agencies have been afforded the opportunity for a thorough review of the Amendment No 1 to the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and all applicable comments and/or conditions related to installation and maintenance of landscaping, street dedications, regulations of points of vehicular ingress and egress and control of potential nuisances have been implemented, so as to eliminate any negative impacts to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or the City. 6. In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), impacts have been reduced to a less than significant level, or in the case where impacts remain, a statement of overriding considerations must be adopted to justify the merits of project implementation. Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 2006-05 (State Clearinghouse No. 2006017027) was adopted by the City Council on September 12, 2006. The MND adequately addressed the potential impacts of the proposed and approved project. In accordance with Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed amendments to previously approved projects do not present substantial changes or reveal new information that would require Subsequent or Supplemental CEQA analysis. However, some changes or additions to the information contained in the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration is necessary in order to approve the proposed project. For this reason an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared. The combined mitigation measures included in Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 2006-05 (State Clearinghouse No. 2006017027) and the Addendum adequately reduce any potential significant impacts to levels of less than significant impacts, thus no additional environmental analysis is warranted. SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented, both written and testimonial and such other matters as reflected in the record, and the above findings, the City Council hereby adopts Amendment No. 1 to The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1341 PAGE 4 of 4 APPROVED AND INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 23rd day of June 2015; and Adopted at the regular City Council meeting of 14'" day of July 2015. Steve Manos, Mayor City of Lake Elsinore City Council ATTEST: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Leibold, City Attorney Agenda Date: 7/14/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 10) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 15-671 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w lake-elsinore org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City o/ Lake Elsinore Page 7 Printed on 7/9/2015 JUNE 25, 201 WA;R2SANT ]LIS 1' SUCCESSOR AGENCY t 'E "]['I Jl ,ItIE]DIEV;IILCuF'@Ml[:N'-,' AGI NICY 01:1 -11 -FE CYTY OF LAKE FIS1NC RE 0ILCK# V: -MOOR NAME AMOUN"1 7281 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE $ 552.50 7282 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 2,380.00 7283 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 170.00 7284 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 35,341.23 7285 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 42,864.06 7286 LEIBOLD, MCCLENDON & MANN 4,30771 7287 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO_ N 676.70 122466 OAK GROVE EQUITITES, INC. 10,28115 WARRANT TOTAL 573.95 GRAND TOTAL $ 96,573.95 7/9/2015 Warrant 06 25 15 SA RDA 1 of 1 JUNE, 25, 2015 WA;R;RAN T SUMMARY SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THIL, RE;D',E'V°E!LOI['1MIEN'1F AGENCY COIF lF,HI'E CFFY O ,LAlKF E,LSNNOIRIE PLINI)# FUND DLSCRIP'l ION TOTAL 510 SUCCESSOR TO RDA AREA 1 $ 50,610.95 520 SUCCESSOR TO RDA AREA 2 26 232.78 530 SUCCESSOR TO RDA AREA 3 1,H3.90 540 SUCCESSOR STADIUM CAPITAL 18,067.22 GRAND TOTAL $ 96,573.95 7/9/2015 Warrant 06 25 15 SA RDA 1 of 1 4..r�aae. a LLS I N 0I Z DRt:ANI L;XI REME REPORT TO SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE TO: HONORABLE AGENCY CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY FROM: GRANT YATES EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DATE: JULY 25, 2015 SUBJECT: WARRANT LIST DATED JUNE 25, 2015 Recommendation It is recommended that the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Warrant List dated June 25, 2015. Discussion The warrant list is a listing of all general checks issued by the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore since the prior Warrant List. Prepared By: Frances Ramirez Account Specialist II Reviewed By: Jason Simpson Administrative Services Director Approved By: Grant Yates City Manager Attachments: Warrant List 6-25-15 Agenda Date: 7/14/2015 In Control: Successor Agency Agenda Number: 2) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 15-673 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City o/ Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 7/9/2015 Successor Agency Meeting Minutes Motion by Vice Chair Tisdale, second by Agency Member Magee, to approve the Consent Calendar passed by unanimuos vote as follow: AYES Agency Member Johnson, Agency Member Magee, Vice Chair Tisdale, and Chair Manos NOES None ABSENT: Agency Member Hickman ABSTAIN: None PUBLIC HEARING(S) - None BUSINESS ITEM(S) - None ADJOURNMENT Chair Manos adjourned the Successor Agency meeting at 8:12 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, July 14, 2015. Steve Manos, Chair Virginia J. Bloom, Agency Clerk City of Lake Elsinore Page 2 June 23, 2015 Lt)l,,E CjLS1N(-)Rj �—V NCAS Y.}xIId IM Tuesday, June 23, 2015 CALL TO ORDER City of Lake Elsinore Meeting Minutes Successor Agency STEVE MANOS, CHAIR BRIAN TISDALE, VICE -CHAIR NATASHA JOHNSON, AGENCYMEMBER DARYL HICKMAN, AGENCYMEMBER ROBERT MAGEE, AGENCYMEMBER GRANT YATES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 7:00 PM Chair Manos called the meeting to order at 8:11 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Agency Member Johnson, Agency Member Magee, Vice Chair Tisdale, and Chair Manos ABSENT: Agency Member Hickman LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE CULTURAL CENTER 183 N. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 Cultural Center Also present: Executive Director Yates, Agency Counsel Leibold, and Agency Clerk Bloom, Administrative Services Simpson, Community Development Director Taylor, Interim Public Works Director Smith, Community Services Director Skinner, Police Chief Hollingsworth, Fire Chief Newman, Planning Manager MacHott, Management Analyst Dailey and Deputy City Clerk Giron PUBLIC COMMENTS — None CONSENT CALENDAR 1) ID# 14-638 Approval of Minutes Attachments: SA Staff Rpt Minutes for Approval 6-9-2015 SA Minutes It is recommended that the Successor Agency approve Minutes as submitted. 2) ID# 14-639 Successor Agency Investment Report for May 2015 Attachments: SA RDA Investment Staff Report 2015-05 RDA Investment Report 2015-05 Staff recommends that the Members of the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Investment Report for May 2015. City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 CITY OF ,rte., LAKE C,-. LSII` ORJE REPORT TO SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE TO: Honorable Chair and Members of the Successor Agency FROM: Virginia J. Bloom, Agency Clerk DATE: July 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes Recommendation It is recommended that the Successor Agency approve Minutes as submitted. Discussion The following minutes are submitted for approval: a. Regular Successor Agency meeting of June 23, 2015 Prepared by: Diana Giron Deputy City Clerk Approved and Submitted by: Virginia J. Bloom Agency Clerk Approved by: Grant Yates Executive Director Attachment: Draft Minutes of June 23, 2015 Agenda Date: 7/14/2015 In Control: Successor Agency Agenda Number: 1) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 15-672 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City o(Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 7/9/2015 Successor Agency Regular Agenda July 14, 2015 CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 1 MINUTE (Please read & complete a Request to Address the Successor Agency form prior to the start of the meeting and turn it in to the Clerk. The Chair or Clerk will call on you to speak.) CONSENT CALENDAR (All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved in one motion, unless an Agency Member or any member of the public requests separate action on a specific item.) 1) ID# 15-672 Approval of Minutes Recommendation: It is recommended that the Successor Agency approve Minutes as submitted. Attachments: SA Staff Rot Minutes for Approval SA Minutes of 6-23-2015 2) ID# 15-673 Warrant List dated June 25, 2015 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Warrant List dated June 25, 2015. At(achrnenls: SA RDA Staff Report 7-14-15 SA RDA Warrant Summary, 06 25 15 SA RDA Warrant List 06 25 15 PUBLIC HEARING(S) - None BUSINESS ITEM(S) - None ADJOURNMENT The Lake Elsinore Successor Agency will adjourn this meeting to the next regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, July 28, 2015. The regular Closed Session meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. at the Cultural Center and the regular Public meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. at the Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Virginia J. Bloom, Successor Agency Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, do hereby affirm that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall 72 hours in advance of this meeting. Virginia J. Bloom, Successor Agency Clerk City of Lake Elsinore Page 2 Printed on 7/9/2015 Lfl >LSII10RJE Tuesday, July 14, 2015 City of Lake Elsinore Regular Agenda Successor Agency STEVE MANOS, CHAIR BRIAN TISDALE, VICE -CHAIR NATASHA JOHNSON, AGENCY MEMBER DARYL HICKMAN, AGENCY MEMBER ROBERTMAGEE, AGENCYMEMBER GRANT YATES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 7:00 PM CLOSED SESSION - None PUBLIC SESSION at 7:00 PM Cultural Center 183 N. Main St., Lake Elsinore LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 874-3124 PHONE CULTURAL CENTER 183 N. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 Cultural Center The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the Council and Agency with valuable information regarding issues of the community. Meetings are held on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of every month. In addition, meetings are televised live on Time Warner Cable Station Channel 29 and Verizon subscribers can view the meetings on Channel 31. If you are attending this City Council Meeting, please park in the parking lot across the street from the Cultural Center. This will assist us in limiting the impact of meetings on the Downtown Business District. Thank you for your cooperation. The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting outside of City Hall and is available at each meeting. The agenda and related reports are also available at City Hall on the Friday prior to the Council meeting and are available on the City's website at www.Lake-Elsinore.org. Any writings distributed within 72 hours of the meeting will be made available to the public at the time it is distributed to the City Council. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 674-3124 Ext. 269, at least 48 hours before the meeting to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 7/9/2015 JUNG 25, 2015 CITY O1' Ln1KE ELS111\10RE, 1N/i:RRAN1' 1.155 Cl 1111c K/t VFNDOR NAME An40UN'F 122470_ RH CONSULTING 850.00 122471 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPT. 1,291,678.39 122472 SHRED IT USA, LLC _ 84.00 _ 122473 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 106.28 122474 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 2,020.50 _ 122475 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 30,710.56 122476 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 323.83 122477 STK ARCHITECTURE, INC. 49 911.25 122478 TASC 551.58 122479 TIME WARNER CABLE _- _ 929.41 _ 122480 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 625;00 ...__ _. _ - 122481 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 95.32 122482 VERIZON -INTERNET 459.98 122483 VERIZON WIRELESS l) _ 455.78 122484 _. _ VERIZON WIRELESS _ _-_ _ 221.64 122485 ,(tq VISION SERVICE PLAN 1,309.75 122486 VISION TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION, LLC 200.00 122487 CLEAN FUEL CONNECTION, INC. 85742.05 122488 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 97,904.00 122489 IMPACT PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS 182.52__ 122490 GUSTAVO POLETTI ___ 100.50 122491 JEANNE REYNOLDS 5.00 122492 KATHLEEN R. SMITH 123.75 122493 SO CAL LAND MAINTENANCE, INC. _ _ 12,443.94 122495 WILLIAMS BAIT & TACKLE, INC. 16 408.87 122496 ARAMEXX GROUP, INC. 88,842.46 122497 CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL 6,814.40 122498 CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL 721.60 DRAFT2 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 51,462.86 _ DRAFT 3 --- EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 8,006.79 DRAFT 4 CALPERS 120,265.12 WARRANT TOTAL 3.987,358.22 PAY DATE- ------------ .__ ------ 06/08/15 CALIFORNIA PERS 49,211.95 06/04/15 PAYROLL CASH 137,579.49 06/04/15 PAYROLLTAXES 61,341.36 06/08/15 WIRE TRANSFER -UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 3,255.30 06/08/15 WIRE SFER-WELLS FARGO BANK TRAN 29,989.00 06/09/15 WIRE TRANSFER -FIRST CITIZENS BANK AND TRUST CO. 55,148.50 06/09/15 WIRE TRANSFER -CITIZENS BUSINESS BANK 5200.00_ 06/10/15 WIRE TRANSFER -WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVT'S 328,301.00 GRAND TOTAL $ 4,657,384.82 7/9/2015 Warrant 06 25 15 City 3 OF 3 JUNE 25, 2,075 CITY O LAIK]E lE1LSINORE WARRANT LIS";f' cI-16C.K# VFNIDOR NAME AMOUNT 122411 VCS ENVIRONMENTAL 5,883.42 122412122414 VERIZON CALIFORNIA - -VERIZON _ 2,766.11 122415 -- WIRELESS (#1) 530.97 122416 VERIZON WIRELESS (#2) 69.37 122417 --- VERIZON WIRELESS (#8) 1,538.13 122418 _ VERIZON WIRELESS (#9) 98.02 122419 VILLA ROOT BARRIER 239.57 122420 VILLAGE EQUIPMENT RENTALS, INC -VULCAN 3,899.00 122421 MATERIALS COMPANY 417.33 122422 WALLACE & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING - 17,340.00 122423 _ WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY -WEST - 1,193.68 122424 COAST SERV_I_CES 450.00 122425. X FACTOR MARINE _ - _ 1,029.00 122428 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF 325 .00 122429 SUZETTES OROZCO ----ACCOUNTEMPS _ - 375.911 122430 -_ ---.__ ----- -- - - 8,206.0-7 -7 122431 ADAMS LANDSCAPING INC _ 1,787.50 122432 ALBERT WEBB &ASSOCIATES 6,550.50 122433 _ ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 935.00 122434 _ ARAMEXXGROUP, INC -- -- -- -- 54,211.27 35 1224436 - _- ._-_ - BANK OF AMERICA, CITY - ---- _ 821.00- 122 - --- - BANK OF AMERICA CITY ...- 697.68- 122437 _BANK OF AMERICA, CITY -- - 5,637.18 22 1439 - -- BANK OFAMERICACITY ----- - _ - - 507.15- 122440 _ BANK OF AMERICA, CITY- - 14.95 122441 MIA BELTRAN _ 3,250.00 122442 BERGERABAM INC. _ 44,625.00 122443 _ -- YARABITHBUENFIL 813.00- 122444 _ CALIFORNIA GOLD DEVELOPMENT 141,142.00 122445 -- -- CAMBERN & CENTRAL INVESTORS, LLC _ 2W 18.50- 122446 CDW GOVERNMENT' M7 441.62 122447 - COLONIAL LIFE804.01 122448 DELL MARKETING, L.P.1,090.98 --DIRECTV - ____— __.__.- __. 122449...__- - -- - ___- 66.99-- 122450 DISH NETWORK - ------ __ 100.27_ 122451 FEDERALEXPRESSCORPORATION 25.58 122452 FILARSKY & WATT LLP ____ -- 2,310.00 122453 .._.__- GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SERVICES -- - _._ 1,407.13- 122454 HDL COREN &CONE ---- _..._ --- 1,477.70 122455 _ IMPACT PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS -INl-ANb-uRGENlT 494.48 122456 CARE MEDICAL CORP. 355.00 122457 _INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS 1,771.07 122458IRON MOUNTAIN IN_C. ..- - _ 85.00 122459 JOE S HARDWARE -- 109.22 122460 _ STEVE KARVELOT - 75.00_ 122461 _. THE L U OF N A 2 481.60 122462_ - _LEGAL SHIELD _ - 155.40 122463 _ _ LIUNA LOCAL 777 _- __ -- 1,173.00 122464 NEOPOST USA INC - - -- ----- - 4,169.06 122465 NETCOMPTECHNOLOGIES INC. 1,383.20 122467 _ ORKIN INC. --- 93.06 122468 GUSTAVO POLETTI 48.00 122469 PYRAMID ENTERPRISES INC. - - - _- -- 900.00 7/9/2015 Warrant 06 25 15 City 2 OF 3 UNL25,2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORiE CH CK11 VIINI3UR NAn4r 122352 A.P.W. TAEKWONDO 122353 _ --ABOVE ALL NAMES CONSTRUCTION IN 122354 ALLEN AUTO GLASS 122355 ALLIED TRAFFIC EQUIPMENT RENTAL 122356 AMERICAN MATERIAL CO. 122357 APPLE ONE 122358 BIO-TOXLABORATORIES 122359 BMW MOTORCYCLES OF RIVERSIDE 122360 CMS BUSINESS FORMS, INC. 122361 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELING, INC. -& 122362 EAGLE ROAD SERVICE TIRE 122363 ECONoLffff CONTROL PRODUCTS, INC. 122364 CHRIS ERICKSON 122366-1 223 67 EXCEL LANDSCAPE, INC. 122368 FORTEL TRAFFIC, IN C. 122369 GORM, INC 122370 H BARBER & S( 122371 LORENA HANCOCK 122372 LORENAHANCOCK 122373 I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT TRUST 122374 INLAND EMPIRE LOCK & KEY 122375 INLAND URGENT CARE, MEDICAL CORP. 122376 LAKE CHEVROLET 122377 LAKE ELSINORE PTSA COUNCIL 122378 LEIBOLD, MCCLENDON & MANN 1M79 _ LIEBERTCASSIDY WHITMORE 122380 MANPOWER TEMPSERVICES 122381 MARK BURSTEIN, APC 122382 _ _ NATIONAL PEN CORPORATION 122383 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 122384 PAULEY EQUIPMENT OF TEMECULA, INC. 122385 GUSTAVO POLETTI 122386 PREMIERMARKETING 122387 THE PRESS ENTERPRISE 122388 _ PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 122389 QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS CORP. 122390 RAIN MASTER IRRIGATION SYSTEMS 122391 RIGHTWAY SITE SERVICES, INC. 122392 RivEksiff COUNTY SHERIFF 122393 RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF TRANSPORTATION AND LAND 122394 _ ROW TRAFFIC SAFETY, INC 122395 122396 122397-122403 122404- __-- 122405- 122406--- _-_- SILVER SOUTHWEST SPOHN RANC STANTEC ON CO. INC. 122407 STAUFFER'S LAWN EQUIPMEN I _ 122408 SUN PAC CONTAINERS 122409 _ TEAM AUTOAID, INC. 122410 _ TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS 7/9/2015 Warrant 06 25 15 City 1 OF 3 WARRANT LIS -F AMOUN F $ 4U5.UU 11, 650.00 335.00 1,078.48 1,354.96 1,932.00 - 4,304.02 315.63 1,350.66 7,199.66 3 027._50-- 7,391.52 150.00 229.31 5,100.00 12,037.50 1,950.93 3,471.63 _ 135.60 3,208.56 3,138.00 574.44 66.75 559.20 341.94 724.69 322.65 1,245.91 -- _ 1,164,846.25 JAGEMENT 30,090.58 1 751.87 -_-- -__-- 5,940.00-- ...._ ------ --__ -._-- 8,342.30 13,037.29 -- - 500.00 118,500.00 4,920.00.- 472.90 160.00 3.67 539.41 JUNE 25, 2015 CITY 101E LAKE JE,LS111 N OIR1E WARRAMY SUMMARY 1 UNT)# 110 STAT 130 LIGH 135 LEM AX FUND MAI FUND DlSCCR.IPTI ON 300 INSURANCE 305 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 310 SUPPORT SERVICES 315 FLEET 320 FACILITIES 332 C.F.D. 2006-1A SUMMERLY IMPROVEMENT 357 C.F.D. 2b63 -02-f" CANYON HILLS DEBT S 500_ CAPITALIMPROVEMENTPLAN 608 TRUST DEPOSITS 617 SA RDA HOUSING FUND TRUST FUND I COTA 1. 42 291.63 20,739.64 1,508.0_6_ _ 935.00 3, 027.18 1, 771.07 15 15 GRAND TOTAL $ 4,657,384.82 7/9/2015 Warrant 06 25 15 City 1 of 1 CC:1`1'Y c F w DR1i.AM E,)(TRL:ML REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 14, 2015 SUBJECT: WARRANT LIST DATED JUNE 25, 2015 Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Warrant List dated on June 25, 2015, Discussion The warrant list is a listing of all general checks issued since the prior warrant list. Prepared By: Frances Ramirez Account Specialist II Reviewed By: Jason Simpson Administrative Services Director Approved By: Grant Yates City Manager Attachments: Warrant List 6-25-15 Agenda Date: 7/14/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 1) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 15-662 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 7/9/2015 City Council Regular Agenda July 14, 2015 Attachments: Staff Report -Second Reading of Ordinance Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan Ordinance No. 2015-1341 The Villaqe at Lakeshore Specific Plan Amendment 10) ID# 15-671 Lake Update & Outreach - Lake Watch 2015 Recommendation: Discuss, review and approve the proposed Lake Watch 2015 to educate, engage and inform the community about Lake Elsinore. Attachments: Report to City Council - Lake Watch 2015 PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 3 MINUTES (Please read & complete a Request to Address the City Council form prior to the start of the City Council Meeting and turn it in to the City Clerk. The Mayor or City Clerk will call on you to speak.) CITY MANAGER COMMENTS CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT The Lake Elsinore City Council will adjourn this meeting to the next regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, July 28, 2015. The regular Closed Session meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. at the Cultural Center and the regular Public meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. at the Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, do hereby affirm that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall 72 hours in advance of this meeting. Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore Page 6 Printed on 7/9/2015 City Council Regular Agenda July 14, 2015 Into Six Lots For Finance And Conveyance Purposes. Attachments: Terracina Specific Plan - CC Staff Report 7-14-15 Terracina SP - Vicinity Map 7-14-15 Terracina SP - Aerial Map 7-14-15 Terracina Specific Plan - CC CEQA Resolution 7-14-15 Terracina Specific Plan - CC MSHCP Resolution 7-14-15 Terracina Specific Plan - CC SP & ZC 2012-05 Ordinance 7-14-15 Terracina Specific Plan - CC GPA 2012-03 Resolution 7-14-15 VTTM 36557 - CC Resolution 7-14-15 TTM 36577 - CC Resolution 7-14-15 SP 2012-01 - CC Conditions of Approval -Terracina 7-14-15 VTTM 36557 - CC Conditions of Approval -Terracina 7-14-15 TTM 36577 - CC Conditions of Approval - Terracina 7-14-15 Terracina Specific Plan - Revised Park Site and Conceptual Park Plan 7-14-15 Terracina Draft SP - December 2014 7-14-15 VTTM 36557 7-14-15 TTM 36577 7-14-15 Terracina SP - IS -MND 7-14-15 Terracina SP - IS -MND -Response to Comments 7-14-15 Terracina SP - MMRP for IS -MND 7-14-15 Terracina Specific Plan - CC Staff Report 5-12-15 Planning Commission 12-2-14 1-6-15 and 3-17-15 Minutes 8) ID# 15-669 Resolution to Approve Placing Delinquent Residential Refuse Fees on FY 2015-2016 Property Tax Roll Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. 2015-064 and direct the City Clerk to file with the Riverside County Auditor a certified copy of Resolution No. 2015-064 along with the 120 -days past due accounts report. Attachments: Staff Report - Deliuent Residential Refuse Bills Tax Roll 2015 Resolution for Delinquent Residential Refuse Tax Roll 2015 RED Exhibit A Update delinquent list for Lake Elsinore Tax Roll Accounts APPEAL(S) - None BUSINESS ITEMS 9) ID# 15-670 Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2015-1341 relating to The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council waive further reading and adopt by title only Ordinance No. 2015 -1341 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE VILLAGE AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN by roll call vote. City of Lake Elsinore Page 5 Printed on 71912015 City Council Regular Agenda July 14, 2015 A.) Award Agreement for Professional Services to Michael Baker International Company for the Design of the Third Street Drainage Improvement project; and Attachments: PUBLIC HEARING(S) 6) ID# 15-667 B.) Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in the amount of $173,169 to Michael Baker International Company, in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. Staff Report 3rd Street Drainage Michael Baker PSA with Michael Baker 3rd St Drainage Capital Improvement Plan for FY 2015-16 through 2019-2020 Recommendation: Staff recommends that City Council adopt Resolution 2015-065 adopting the proposed 5 -year Capital Improvement Plan for fiscal years 2015-16 through 2019-20. Attachments: Capital Improvement Program 2016 2020 Agenda Report Special Revenue -All Funds 6-30-2015 public hearing Resolution CIP FY2015-16 TO 2019-20 CIP Reso PC 2015-47 7) ID# 15-668 Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and Related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No. 2012-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557, and Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 - Applications by Spectrum Communities Proposing a 150.8 -Acre Residential Development Located Adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street and extending to Hoff Avenue Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions: A.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-033 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2015-01 For The Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and Related Applications. B.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-034 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Adopting Findings of Consistency with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan for the Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and Related Applications. C.) Approve and Introduce by title only and waive further reading of ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1336 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN (SP No. 2012-01) AND ADOPTING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2012-05, by roll -call vote. D.) Adopt Resolution No, 2015-035 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Approving General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03. E.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-036 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557, Subdividing 150.8 Acres. F.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-037 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Approving Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 Subdividing 150.8 Acres City_ City of Lake Elsinore Page 4 Printed on 7/9/2015 City Council Regular Agenda July 14, 2015 2) 3) 4) 5) Attachments- City Staff Report 7-14-15 Warrant Summary City 06 25 15 Warrant List City 06 25 15 ID# 15-663 Approval of Minutes Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Minutes as submitted. Attachments: CC Minute Report CC Minutes of 6-23-2015 ID# 15-664 Amendment No. 1 to Agreement for Professional Services with Civil Source, Inc. Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No, 1 to approve the second year of the Agreement for Professional Services with Civil Source, Inc., for project management and engineering services, in substantially the form and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. Attachments: Staff Report Attachment A -Amendment No. 1 Civil Source PSA ID# 15-665 Industrial Design Review 2015-01 - A Request for Approval of Building Design Plans for a 12,926 Square Foot Light Industrial Building. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: A.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-062 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Adopting Findings that Industrial Design Review No. 2015-01 is Consistent with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. B.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-063 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Approving of Industrial Design Review No. 2015-01 for the Development of a New 12,926 Square Foot Light Industrial Building on an Approximately 31,905 Square Foot Site Located at the Southwestern Corner of Minthorn and Birch Streets, Attachments: OR 2015-01 - CC - Staff Report 7-14-15 IDR 2015-01 - CC - Vicinity Mao - 7-14-15 IDR 2015-01 - CC - Aerial Man - 7-14-15 IDR 2015-01 - CC - MSHCP Resolution 7-14-15 IDR 2015-01 - CC - DR Resolution 7-14-15 IDR 2015-01 - CC - Conditions of Approval 7-14-15 OR 2015-01 - CC - Project Plans - 7-14-15 DR 2015-01 - CC - PC Staff Report - 6-16-15 - 7-14-15 ID# 15-666 Award Agreement for Professional Services for Third Street Drainage Design Services Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: City of Lake Elsinore Page J Printed on 7/9/2075 City Council Regular Agenda July 14, 2015 CALL TO ORDER 5:00 P.M. ROLL CALL CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (GOVT CODE § 54957.6): UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEE: CITY MANAGER CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL --ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Gov't Code Section 54956.9: 1 potential case CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL --ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: 1 potential case PUBLIC COMMENTS CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION — MOMENT OF SILENT PRAYER ROLL CALL CLOSED SESSION REPORT PRESENTATIONS / CEREMONIALS "Recognition of Storyland Studios as Business of the Quarter PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS — 1 MINUTE (Please read & complete a Request to Address the City Council form prior to the start of the City Council meeting and turn it into the City Clerk. The Mayor or City Clerk will call on you to speak.) CONSENT CALENDAR (All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved in one motion: unless a Council Member or any member of the public requests separate action on a specific item.) 1) ID# 15-662 Warrant List dated June 25, 2015 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Warrant List dated on June 25, 2015. City of Lake Elsinore Page 2 Printed on 7/9/2015 CIT'! 012^ LAKELSII� `OI`E �> DILL,�ti'. EX rltf ul City of Lake Elsinore Regular Agenda City Council STEVE MANOS, MAYOR BRIAN TISDALE, MAYOR PRO TEM DARYL HICKMAN, COUNCIL MEMBER ROBERT MAGEE, COUNCIL MEMBER NATASHA JOHNSON, COUNCIL MEMBER GRANT YATES, CITY MANAGER LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE CULTURAL CENTER 183 N. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 Tuesday, July 14, 2015 7:00 PM Cultural Center CLOSED SESSION at 5:00 PM PUBLIC SESSION at 7:00 PM Cultural Center 183 N. Main St., Lake Elsinore The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the Council and Agency with valuable information regarding issues of the community. Meetings are held on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of every month. In addition, meetings are televised live on Time Warner Cable Station Channel 29 and Verizon subscribers can view the meetings on Channel 31. If you are attending this City Council Meeting, please park in the parking lot across the street from the Cultural Center. This will assist us in limiting the impact of meetings on the Downtown Business District. Thank you for your cooperation. The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting outside of City Hall and is available at each meeting. The agenda and related reports are also available at City Hall on the Friday prior to the Council meeting and are available on the City's website at www,Lake-Elsinore.org. Any writings distributed within 72 hours of the meeting will be made available to the public at the time it is distributed to the City Council. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 674-3124 Ext. 269, at least 48 hours before the meeting to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. CITY VISION STATEMENT The City of Lake Elsinore will be the ultimate lake destination where all can live, work and play, build futures and fulfill dreams. City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 7/9/2015 CITY OF LAKE J LSII`�OIZ DREAM EXTREME, REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 14, 2015 SUBJECT: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR FY 2015-16 THROUGH 2019- 2020 Recommendation Staff recommends that City Council adopt Resolution 2015 — adopting the proposed 5 -year Capital Improvement Plan for fiscal years 2015-16 through 2019-20. Background By direction of the City Council, City staff updates and maintains a Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) in conjunction with the annual budget cycle. Included in the CIP are construction projects, facility improvements, and purchases. Utilizing input from Council, staff and the public, provided at the Budget Study session held on May 26, 2015; various projects were developed and proposed in this Cycle of the CIP. In compliance with Government Code 65401, the Planning Commission reviewed the City's program and found it in conformance with the City's General Plan. CIP Projects have been classified into two types of projects, Construction and Non - Construction CIP, and four categories: Circulation, Facilities, Infrastructure, and Parks. The Construction CIP are projects concerning major infrastructure or specific improvement projects. The Non -Construction CIP are major purchases by the City or recurring street improvements, studies, plans, or equipment (i.e., annual slurry seal, traffic lights, IT/Computer implementations, etc.). Discussion This CIP budget document was developed by incorporating input from the City Council and key management team members, based on community comments and feedback received throughout the year. This team then, through several internal workshops, identified and evaluated community needs in the areas of roads/streets, bridges, public buildings, parks and recreation facilities projects. Each proposed project was reviewed Capital Improvement Plan for FY 2015-16 through FY2019-20 July 14, 2015 Page 2 and discussed to ensure funding, timing, and necessity were appropriately addressed. An Operating Budget and CIP Budget workshop was held on May 26, 2015. This workshop provided the City Council with an overview of the major projects, and to receive public comments concerning the five-year program. All projects were evaluated by to ensure consistency with the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, while considering the City's long-term vision as developed by the City Council. The Planning Commission also considered the proposed CIP projects and adopted the attached Resolution finding consistency with the City's General Plan. Projects in this document have been scheduled in each of the five fiscal years based on community needs, as determined by the City Council and availability of funding. Additionally, since many projects in the CIP are conceptual in nature, the general outline for cost estimates provided in last year's CIP document was revised and utilized as shown on the Parameters for CIP Budget Cost page. The fiscal years 2016-20 CIP identifies a total of 99 projects consisting of 41 Circulation Projects totaling $25,078,125; 17 Facilities Projects totaling $25,605,340; 17 Infrastructure Projects totaling $9,051,825; and 24 Park Projects totaling $16,681,274. The total cost to complete all of the proposed projects is $76,416,564, of which $47,231,108 is programmed for FY 2015-16. Also of note, in this document, there are over $29.1 million in projects with unspecified funding sources. These projects have been identified as necessary infrastructure for the City, and will require that funding sources be identified before the projects can commence. Inclusion of those with funding still needed in the document assists staff with seeking grants and negotiating improvements with potential 31d parties. Other key elements to the Capital Improvement Plan are: - Continue improvements fund by the Total Road Improvement Program (T.R.I.P. Measure A Sales Tax Bond) financing to fund Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation and other Street related capital projects. ($5,144,728) - Camino Del Norte Street Improvements ($3,000,000) - Rosetta Canyon Park Improvements ($7,123,871) - Serenity Park Improvements ($1,017,800) - Central Avenue Drainage Improvements ($3,138,879) - Whisker's Fishing Beach Improvements ($420,000) - Several Interchange Projects, Traffic Signals, and other improvements are listed in more detail within the attached CIP document. Fiscal Impact The Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Year 2015-16 through 2019-20 includes improvements throughout the City. Total capital improvement plan cost is $76,416,564 with $47,231,108 in funding identified. Funding sources include, but are not limited to, development fees from TIF and Area Drainage, grants including CDBG, Measure -A and Gas Tax, and assessment districts for specific project areas. Capital Improvement Plan for FY 2015-16 through FY2019-20 July 14, 2015 Page 3 Prepared by: Jason Simpson Director of Administrative Services Approved by: Grant M. Yates City Manager Attachment: City Council Resolution No. 2015-_ FY2016-2020 Capital Improvement Plan - Project Summary by Type of Project J 1b5 N. L^ J. G ({\ ƒ «c«L©Z R V' J C W !. O O C 6 L J. O C RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS 2015-16 THROUGH 2019-20. WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore annually adopts and updates a long-range program of proposed capital improvement projects with single and multiple -year capital expenditures to guide the planning, scheduling and budgeting of capital improvement projects during the next five-year period; and WHEREAS, staff has prepared a proposed Capital Improvement Plan ("CIP") for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 which includes appropriations for each capital improvement project presented in the budget, with some projects spanning multiple fiscal years; and WHEREAS, on May 26, 2015 the City Council held a study session on the proposed budget for Fiscal Years 2015-16; and WHEREAS, the May 26, 2015 study session included discussions about the 2015- 16 to 2019-20 CIP; and WHEREAS, the proposed CIP for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 was submitted to the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission at its regularly scheduled public meeting of June 16, 2015; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 65401, the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission, by PC Resolution 2014-_, made a finding that CIP for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 conforms to the Lake Elsinore General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has caused to be transmitted to the City Council a copy of its report and resolution finding that the CIP for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 conforms to the Lake Elsinore General Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed CIP for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 was submitted to the City Council at a noticed public hearing on July 14, 2015; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered testimony and evidence presented at the public hearing on July 14, 2015, and reviewed the proposed CIP for Fiscal Years 2015- 16 through 2019-20 in light of all information presented. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015-_ Page 2 of 4 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council confirms and accepts the finding of the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission that the CIP for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 conforms to the Lake Elsinore General Plan. SECTION 2. The City Council finds that the CIP for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 demonstrates the efficient appropriation of public funds relating to the implementation of capital improvement projects anticipated to be undertaken throughout the City over the course of the ensuing five years. The City Council further finds that the CIP is a governmental fiscal activity which does not involve a commitment to a specific project that may result in potentially significant impacts on the environment and that the adoption of the CIP is not a "project' within the meaning of CEQA. Individual projects developed pursuant to the CIP will be subject to CEQA. SECTION 3. The CIP for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 is hereby approved and adopted. A copy of the CIP for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 hereby adopted and certified by the City Clerk, shall be filed with the City Manager or a designated representative, and a further copy so certified shall be placed and shall remain on file in the Office of the City Clerk where it shall be available for inspection. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14h day of July, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Steve Manos, Mayor City of Lake Elsinore CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015-_ Page 3 of 4 ATTEST: Virginia Bloom, City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Zeid Leibold, City Attorney City of Lake Elsinore CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - Page 4 of 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, that Resolution No. regular meeting hel AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: d 2015-_ was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake on the 14th day of July, 2015 by the following vote: Virginia J. Bloom, CMC City Clerk hereby certify Elsinore at a RESOLUTION NO. 2015-47 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT THE 2015/2016- 2020/2021 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONFORMS TO THE LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore ("City") has directed Staff to assemble a five (5) year program of capital improvement projects to be used as a guideline for construction of City facilities and infrastructure; and WHEREAS, this program of projects is collectively called the Capital Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, the list of construction projects and improvements either enhances existing facilities or provides for new facilities in accordance with the guidelines and requirements contained in the Lake Elsinore General Plan; and WHEREAS, staff has reviewed all projects both funded and unfunded and finds them to be consistent with the guidelines set forth in the Lake Elsinore General Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65401, the Planning Commission, as a recommending body, must make a finding that proposed capital projects conform with the Lake Elsinore General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission shall submit a report to the City Council regarding the capital projects conformity with the general plan in accordance with California Government Code Section 65401; and WHEREAS, on June 16, 2015, at its regularly scheduled meeting the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Public Works Department, the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1, The Planning Commission has considered the capital improvement projects and has determined that the Capital Improvement Program conforms to the Lake Elsinore General Plan based upon the following findings: 1. The 2015/2016-2020/2021 Capital Improvement Program is consistent with the goals, policies and restrictions of the City's 2011 General Plan and facilitates upgrades and improvements to existing facilities and related amenities throughout the various elements of the General Plan, thereby enhancing the quality of life in Lake Elsinore. 2. The Capital Improvement Program includes master plan studies which PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2015-47 PAGE 2 OF 3 provide for organized development of future facilities appropriate to the various elements of the General Plan, thereby enhancing the quality of life in Lake Elsinore. SECTION 2. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16rd day of June 2015, by the following vote: John Gray, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Richard J. MacHott, LEED Green Associate Planning Manager PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2015-47 PAGE 3 OF 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE f SS I, Richard J. MacHott, Planning Manager of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2015-47 as adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 16rd day of June 2015, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: CHAIRMAN GRAY, VICE CHAIR JORDAN, COMMISSIONER ARMIT, COMMISSIONER FLEMING NOES: COMMISSIONER RAY ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: NONE Richard J. MacHott, I FFD Green Associate Planning Manager CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT PLAN APPROPRIATIONS - FY2015-16 & FUTURE PROJECT SUMMARY BY TYPE OF PROJECT AND PRIORITY CIRCULATION STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ANNUAL CI FYWIDE SLURRY STEAL PROGRAM STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ANNUAL CRACK SE.AI- & POTFIOLE REPAIRS STREET MAINTENANCE ANNUAL. CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK PROGRAM _ _ _ _ STREET MAINTENANCE ANNUAL LANDSCAPE RENOVATION STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ANNUAL ON-CALL TRAFFIC OPERATIONS SERVICES STREET" MAINTENANCE ANNUAL PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (STUDY) STREET MAINTENANCE ANNUAI ROADWAY DRAINAGE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS-CDBG STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT _ ANNUAL TRAFFIC STRIPING MAINTENANCE STREET MAINTENANCE _ _u CITY TRAFFIC MODEL UPDATE Y TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS COLLIER ISLAND MODIFICATION PHASE I J STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT _ GUNNERSON REHABILITATION PHASE I STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT _ _ 1-15/RAILROAD CANYON ROAD SB EXIT RAMP DECELERATION LANE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT MAIN STREET INTERCHANGE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TEMESCAL CANYON ROAD - BRIDGE & ROAD WIDENING PHASE I STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TPA rrir- NAnN11TnRINIf: CAnAUAq TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION Al" GRAND A_VE_NUE & RIVERSIDE DRIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS DOWNTOWN - STREET REHABILITATION &SLURRY SEAL STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT MAIN STREET OVERLAY SULPHUR TO HEALD - 4405 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RAILROAD CANYON ROAD BARRIERS _ STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SENIOR CENTER SIDEWALK _ STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT _ TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIR AT CASINO & DIAMOND TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION A CANYON HILLS ROAD & SAGE LANE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AI"SUMMERHILL&VIA SCENICA TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS LAKESHORE DRIVE PARKING LOT (ENNIS PROPERTY) PARKING LOT STREET SIGN REPLACEMENT SIGNAGE _ CAMINO DEL NORTE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT COUNTRY CLUB BLVD CURB STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LANGSTAFF STREET CURB & GUTTER STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ROSETTA CANYON BIKE LANE STRIPING STRIPING CENTRAL AVENUE/DEXTER STREET TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS SIGNAL MODIFICATION - LAKESHORE/DIAMOND DR TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS ___TRAFFIC CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM (T.R.I.P.) _STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GRAND AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION -CITY/COUNTY PROJECT STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1-15/FRANKLIN STREET INTERCHANGE - PHASE II STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1-15/RA15OAD CANYON ULTIMATE INTERCHANGE :PHASE 1 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 715/STATE ROUTE 74 (CENTRALAVENUE) INTERCHANGE PROJECT LAKE STREET INTERCHANGE STUDY STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT _ STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LOST ROAD IMPROVEMENTS _ STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT MISSION TRAIL TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ;FACILITIES & INFRASTRUCTURE ANNUAL LIBRARY 8001( PURCHASES - 4209 EQUIPMENT ANNUAL BUILDING REPAIR RESERVE - 4380 BUILDING —'-----..__.._ ..__-__..___-_—.___......____. ANNUAL FACILITIES FURNITURE REPLACLMFNT- 4429 EQUIPMENT ANNUAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT RESERVE - ITR14 EQUIPMENT ANNUAL VEHICLE- REPLACEMENT" RESERVE- 4316 DIAMOND STADIUM CAPI TAI. REPAIR SCHEDULE (SA-ROPS) _ _ ELECTRIC VEIIICLE CIIARGI NG STA FIONIS 2ND FLOOR - CULTURAL CEN I"EER EQUIPMENT SITE IMPROVEMENTS SITE IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING NIIY CENTER - WEST COMMUNITY CENTER - EAST BUILDING BUILDING FACILITIES FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM BUILDING REPAIRS CITY OWNED FACIIJTIES ROOF- REPAIRS BUILDING REPAIRS CITY YARD RESTROOM AND LOCKER ROOM RENOVATION - ADABUILDING REPAIRS I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN APPROPRIATIONS - FY2015-16 & FUTURE I PROJECT SUMMARY BY TYPE OF PROJECT AND PRIORITY AQUATICS CENTER BUILDING CITY FACILITIES -EXPANSION CITY LIBRARY BUILDING BUILDING CORPORATE YARD UPGRADES _ SITE IMPRO VEMENTS ARROYO DEL TORO DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT DRAINAGE TFIIRD STREET DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT - PHASE I UNDERGROUND OVERHEAD POWER LINES ----. .----.�. DRAINAGE SITE IMPROVEMENTS ALIGNMENT STUDY (La Strada, Baker, Pierce) --.._...._— CENTRAL AVENUE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS _ _ SITSTUDY_ _ E IMP ROVPMFNTS YAULI I ICJ IVIAJI hl< PLAN MASTER PLAN STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN UPDATE MASTER PLAN DOG PARKS (FENCING-MCVICKER PARK) PARK IMPROVEMENTS LAKEPOINT PARK ELECTRICAL ENCLOSURE - 4414 _ PARK IMPROVEMENTS _ _ MACHADO PARK PLAY EQUIPMENT/REPLACEMENT - 4.416 PARK IMPROVEMENTS SCADA UPGRADES PARI( IMPROVEMENTS SKATE ZONE AT SERENITY PARK- 4419 PARK IMPROVEMENTS SUMMERLAKE PARK PLAYEQUIPMENT/REPLACEMENT - 4417 PARK IMPROVEMENTS YARBOROUGHPARK PLAY EQUIPMENT/REPLACEMENT -441& PARK IMPROVEMENTS —~pARK CITY PARK & YARBOROUGH PARK IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENTS _ ROSETTA PARK IMPROVEMENTS PARK IMPROVEMENTS _ _ SERENITY PARK IMPROVEMENTS PARK IMPROVEMENTS WHISKER'S FISHING BEACH IMPROVEMENTS -4369 PARK IMPROVEMENTS ADA DRINKING FOUNTAIN REPLACEMENT PARK IMPROVEMENTS _ ALBERHILL RANCH PARK SPORTS FIELD RENOVATIONS PARK IMPROVEMENTS CREEKSIDE PARK PLAYGROUND RENOVATION PARK IMPROVEMENTS LAKEPOINT PARK SPORTS FIELD RENOVATION PARK IMPROVEMENTS LAKEPOINT PARK SPORTS LIGHTING —_ PARK IMPROVEMENTS _ _ MCVICKER CANYON PARK SPORTS FIELD RENOVATION W PARK IMPROVEMENTS MCVICKER CANYON SPORTS LIGHTING REPAIR PARK IMPROVEMENTS CITY PARK SPORTS LIGHTING RENOVATION PARK IMPROVEMENTS LA LAGUNA BEACH ACCESS PEDESTRIAN RAMP PARK IMPROVEMENTS LA LAGUNA BOAT LAUNCH LIGHTING PARK IMPROVEMENTS SENIOR CENTER PATIO SHADE STRUCTURE PARK IMPROVEMENTS LA LAGUNA MARINA PARK IMPROVEMENTS LAKESHORE DR AND TERRA COTTA STREETSCAPE DESIGN/RENOVATION LANDSCAPING GRAND AVENUE LANDSCAPING DESIGN & RENOVATION LANDSCAPING MCVICKER CANYON FIRE STATION LANDSCAPING RENOVATION LANDSCAPING _ BIKE & PAT HWAY MASTER PLAN MASTER PLAN _ LAKE FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS r PARK IMPROVEMENTS LAKE INLET CHANNEL PARK IMPROVEMENTS MACHADO STREET LANDSCAPING RENOVATION _ _ _ LANDSCAPING LINCOLN STREET LANDSCAPING, UESIGN, AND RENOVATION LANDSCAPING TUSCANY HILLS PARK SPORTS RENOVATION PARK IMPROVEMENTS SUMMERLAKE PARK(TERRA COTTA SPORTS FIELD RENOVATIONPARK IMPROVEMENTS SWICI<& MATICH PARK FENCING PARK IMPROVEMENTS _ SWICK_&M_ATI_CH SPORTS FIELD RENOVATION PARK IMPROVEMENTS _ WIDENING OF CASINO DRIVE, FROM MALAGA TO RAILROAD CANYON STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ADAM/H EAI.D AVENUE DRAINAGE DRAINAGE ALLAN STREET DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS DRAINAGE CENTRAL AV EN UE DRAI NAGE I M PR0VEME NTS DRAINAGE LOWELL AND POE STREET - DRAINAGE DRAINAGE LAKESHORE DR DRAINAGE --___R— DRAINAGE PEPPEAND DAWES STREET DRAINAGE DRAINAGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN APPROPRIATIONS - FY2015-16 & FUTURE PROJECT SUMMARY BY TYPE OF PROJECT AND PRIORITY PROJECT TYPE NEBRASKA S I RLE T DRAINAGE DRAINAGE SUMNER AVENUE DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTSF:COND STREET BRIDGE OVER 1-15 FREEWAY _ _.-._-.._ DRAINAGE _ BRIDGE _ __- ------ -'--__'__..G.W----�------ AU I O CENTER DRIVE &SAN JACINTO RIVER BRIDGE SEISMIC RETRO PII' BRIDGE OLD COl1 R"(HOUSE 6UI1_DING CIVIC CENTER, COMMUNITY CENTER AND CORPORATE YARD CANYON HILLS SPORTS FIELD RENOVAI"ION SSRECONSTRUCTION POTTERY TO FRANKLIN) _ ORN-CPION STREET IMPROVEMENTS MTOHAM BUILDING REPAIRS BUILDINGS PARK IMPROVEMENTS _ STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NICHOLS ROAD INTER CHANGE___ _ STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT -_-i TR -TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION A1' SUMMERF LL & IA SADA TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS MAIN ST/1-15 IN"t"ERCHANGE RAMP SIGNALIZAIION_-__ _ "__TRAF-FIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS _ SIGNAL- GRAND AVE AND MACY STREET _ _ i` _T_RAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS _ _TR_AFFIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL.- PHASING MODIFICATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS TRAFFIC SIGNAL - STATE HWY 74 & GUNNERSON TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS —. I r,iik L��tillit'•IZ'. Agenda Date: 7/14/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 7) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 15-668 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 7/9/2075 - I •�I..,(�. 11Iiq�. ���, Agenda Date: 7/14/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 6) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 15-667 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elsinore org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 7/9/2015 r 8195 SUBCONTRACTORS LISTED N/A EXHIBIT B arr or _ (.111(Li G>L.SIIYOhi: 3'd Street Drainage Improvements review the status of the work to determine the need for an increase in the budget amount, and whether additional budget authorization to complete the project is appropriate. Progress billings will be forwarded to the City on a monthly basis. These billings will include the fees earned for the billing period plus all direct costs advanced by Consultant. City requiring copies of original receipts for expenses in addition to itemized expenses as shown on monthly invoice will incur an additional 15% administrative handling surcharge included on the monthly invoice. The City shall make every reasonable effort to review invoices within fifteen (15) working days from the date of receipt of the invoices and notify Consultant in writing of any particular item that is alleged to be incorrect. The fees proposed herein shall apply until December 31, 2015. Due to ever-changing costs, Consultant may increase those portions of the contract fee for which work must still be completed after December 31, 2015 by ten percent (10%). I N T E N N A T 1 0 N A L Proposal Engineering Services . Page 10 is n or i nitr L�rsinOt�;: COMPENSATION 3r1 Street Drainage Improvements Consultant shall complete the work outlined above in accordance with the fee schedule identified below and shall invoice City on a monthly basis based on the percentage of completion. ITEM FEE TASK 1 Project Kickoff Meeting......................................................................$5,844 TASK 2 Research and Investigation ................... ........ .................................... ...4,879 TASK 3 Aerial Topographic Mapping .................. ............. ................................. 6,460 TASK 4 Record Data Map Preparation .................. ........ ........ ............... ............. 4,320 TASK 5 Additional Field Surveying ......................... ........................................... 3,660 TASK Geotechnical Investigation ................ ................................................. 10,560 TASK 7 Off -Site Hydrology Study Review ........................ ................................. 9,150 TASK 8 Hydrology and Hydraulic Design Report ............................................18,472 TASK 9 Utility Coordination ........................ ............. ............................. ............. 4,070 TASK 10 Storm Drain Plans ..................... ............ ............................................. 50,242 TASK 11 Structural Calculations — Headwalls / Wingwalls..................... ............. 8,512 TASK 12 Manifold Design (If Required) ...... ............. ................ ............................ 6,847 TASK 13 Technical Specifications .................... ......... .... ....... ............... ................ 8,188 TASK 14 Engineer's Cost Estimates. ... ................. ...... - .... ............... .......... 4,112 TASK 15 Plans, Specifications, and Estimate Submittal ..... ................................. 3,936 TASK 16 Plan Check Revisions/Approvals/Local Agency Permits ....................14,684 TASK 17 * Project Coordination & Meeting Attendance ........................ ................. 7,040 TASK 18 * Construction Phase Support Services ... ................. .............................. 7,040 TASK 19 * Reimbursables.............. ......... ............... ............................................... 2,000 TOTAL AMOUNT $180,016.00 * The budget amount shown is for authorization purposes only. Should the total of the monthly billings reach eighty percent (80%) of the budget amount, City and Consultant will I N T E R N A T 1 0 N N L Proposal Engineering Seivices are or Lid I LSIIYOIZG 3« Street Drainage hTprovements City to provide any and all indemnification, abatement, disposal or other actions required by local, state or federal law regarding hazardous materials. City shall pay all governmental fees and costs. I N T E N N A T 1 0 N A L Proposal Engineering Services • Page 8 CI l'.r CARE (��LSiivor�r 311 Street Drainage Improvements Services. However, Consultant is not obligated to perform such Additional Services unless an amendment to this Agreement has been fully executed setting forth the scope, schedule and fee for such Additional Services. In the event Consultant performs Additional Services before receipt of such executed amendment, City acknowledges its obligation to pay for such services at Consultant's standard rates, within 30 days of receipt of Consultant's invoice. Assumotions: • Consultant can rely on existing plans and documents made available by the City and other agencies and utility companies, without independent verification. • Traffic Control Plans for construction will be submitted by the Contractor. Traffic control plans can be provided upon the City's request for a separate scope and fee. • Sufficient right-of-way exists for the proposed storm drain alignment and no additional right-of-way or easements will be required. Exclusions: Sufficient right-of-way exists for the proposed storm drain alignment and no additional right-of- way or easements will be required. Consulting services relating to any of the following tasks may be completed by Consultant if negotiated under a separate contract for an additional fee; but are presently specifically excluded from this agreement: • Street Improvement Plans/Widening; • Design for areas outside limit of work; • Final Survey Monuments; • Construction Staking; • NOI/SWPPP, • WQMP; • Traffic Control Plans; • Environmental documentation/processing; • Hazardous wastes; • Potholing; • QSP Services, • Construction Management; • Settlement Monitoring (Caltrans) • As -Built Plans • Any other services not specifically set forth in the above Scope of Services Client Responsibilities: • City shall provide access to the site. I N T E R N AT 1 0 N p E Proposal Engineering Services •Page 7 3i1 Street Drainage Improvements TASK 15 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE SUBMITTAL Consultant shall process the completed plans for the purpose of securing approvals and permits. The plans will be submitted at the 60%, 90%, and the 100% level. TASK 16 PLAN CHECK REVISIONS/APPROVALS/LOCAL AGENCY PERMITS Consultant shall process the completed plans for the purpose of securing appropriate approvals and permits from the City, Caltrans, OSHA and RCFCD, as required. Submittals to agencies shall include all plans and required backup data for review. Consultant shall receive written comments from all participating agencies and review with City. Consultant shall draft a response to all agency comments at one time. Consultant will then meet collectively with all participating agencies to resolve outstanding issues relative to agency comments. Consultantwill then prepare final dispositions for each review comment for submittal to the Agencies. Consultant will make revisions to PS&E documents following plan check for second plan check submittal and provide final revised quantity take -offs and cost estimates. When revisions have been made, Consultant will obtain signatures and provide the requested number of stamped plans to the City. TASK 17 PROJECT COORDINATION & MEETING ATTENDANCE Consultant shall attend regularly scheduled meetings with City and Government Agencies to review the progress of the work included within this contract and to provide consulting services. A maximum of 40 hours are included within this Scope of Work. Additional meetings and consulting services will be performed, if required, on an hourly basis for an additional fee. TASK 18 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SUPPORT SERVICES Consultant shall provide support to the Client or his representatives as directed during the construction phase of the project. Scope includes response to Requests for Information (RFI's), attendance in normal meetings and coordination efforts with various agency representatives related to the successful completion of the project's construction. A total of forty (40) hours have been budgeted for this task. Scope does not include the preparation of additional exhibits, plans or as-builts, which are not described within this scope of work. Additional exhibits can be prepared, if requested, under a separate contract, for an additional fee. TASK 19 REIMBURSABLES Consultant shall, in order to perform the previously discussed tasks, incur reimbursable expenses such as printing, reproductions, messenger services, facsimiles and other project -specific out-of- pocket expenses necessary to achieve preparation and processing of the previously discussed task. Additional Services: Services which are not specifically identified herein as services to be performed by Consultant or its consultants are considered "Additional Services" for purposes of this Agreement. City may request that Consultant perform services which are Additional I N T E R N A T 1 0 N N L Proposal Engineering Services •Page 6 Cn'r or L.i1kl- �LSnY0I�1 TASK 10 STORM DRAIN PLANS 311 Street Drainage Improvements Consultant shall design and prepare Storm Drain Improvement Plans for the Flood Control Facilities associated with the Project Site as shown in the RFP and associated preliminary 3rd Street Storm Drain Plans. Plans shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements and criteria of the City of Lake Elsinore and RCFCD. Scope covers the design of approximately 3,200 LF of 36" to 84" RCP, approximately 500 LF of open channel; two (2) headwall and wing wall structures and tunneling details for the storm drain to cross under the 1-15 freeway, including bore pit details. Any engineering services related to preparation of additional improvement plans for offsite storm drain extensions, pump stations, structural details, curb and gutter improvements, interim basin grading at inlets, or other major facilities are not anticipated to be required and therefore, not included within this scope. TASK 11 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS — HEADWALLS / WINGWALLS Consultant shall provide civil and structural engineering services related to the preparation of structural details for the support of the proposed storm drain headwalls and/or wingwalls, if required. Calculations and details shall be prepared in accordance with the minimum allowable values provided by CBC 2013. A total of two (2) details are anticipated for this scope of work. TASK 12 MANIFOLD DESIGN (IF REQUIRED) If required, Consultant shall prepare the necessary hydraulic calculations and structural design for a manifold structure, which can be used to transition from the proposed cylindrical pipe to a box, or parallel pipe system at the crossing under 1-15. This task may not be required if the conventional pipe is able to be continued through a tunneling procedure under the freeway. TASK 13 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Consultant shall develop technical specifications as special provisions in conformance with City's format. This scope of work shall include the preparation of the technical specifications as referenced to the latest edition of the "Greenbook" Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. TASK 14 ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATES Consultant will prepare a final estimate of construction quantities and costs based upon the approved final drawings utilizing the current edition of the Caltrans Contract Cost Data book and recent construction bid information. The specific construction items will be verified with contractors and up-to-date construction management cost data to account for current cost increases and material cost trends. The final detailed engineer's estimate of the project costs will be structured per City's format. Consultant makes no representations concerning the estimated quantities and cost figures made in connection with maps, plans, specifications, or drawings other than that all such figures are estimates only, and Consultant shall not be responsible for fluctuations in cost factors. I N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L Proposal Engineering Services Cell <iI _c.. n aro Street Drainage Improvements shall be designed such that the 100 -year peak flows are fully contained in the system. Consultant shall perform the necessary catch basin hydrology and street capacity calculations to determine if additional catch basin or inlet locations are required to flood -protect adjacent properties. Inlet structures shall be located within the public right of way and shall be designed according to City/County standards. All inlets shall be designed to capture their 100 -year tributary drainage area flows and convey the storm flows to the mainline through connector pipes. A water surface profile reflecting the various junctions and transitions will be prepared to verify the storm drain design and size/capacity. Friction losses shall be calculated by an accepted form of the Manning's equation. Hydraulic calculations using WSPG shall be performed by Consultant to model the proposed storm drain to establish the controlling water surface elevation for the design. Consultant shall document analyses and design with calculation sheets or computerized hydrology/hydraulic analyses using City/District approved software. All process information and results shall be presented in a Hydrology and Hydraulics Report and presented to the City for review. TASK 9 UTILITY COORDINATION Consultant shall coordinate with the utility company contacts regarding the proposed storm drain improvement impacts to their facilities. This will include the consultant providing reference plans to the utility companies/agencies for planning their relocation activities. The utility company will be responsible for relocation plan preparation and the City will be responsible for negotiating cost responsibilities with the utility company. Consultant will transmit initial and final plans to the affected utility companies requesting them to contact the City to coordinate any adjustments and relocations. Consultant will copy the City on all correspondence. If required, Consultant will hire a Dry Utility Consultant who will be responsible for coordinating technical design issues with the utility company, review utility relocation agreements to provide input and comment from a technical design standpoint, and assisting in schedule management between the City and utility company as it relates to the overall design schedule. This is executed, if required, for an additional fee. All new dry utility facilities will be designed by the dry utility agencies or companies as a part of the overall dry utility coordination and design process. Dry utility companies (including any fuel and oil lines) will perform design work with their own farces in preparing final utility relocation plans. In addition, it has been assumed that the utility companies will be responsible for preparation of legal descriptions and exhibits for any interim utility relocations requiring temporary easements. No preparation of legal descriptions and exhibits for new or revised utility easements is assumed for this task. All utility appurtenance relocation and adjustment work will be coordinated with the dry utility companies, and all utility appurtenance relocation and adjustment work will be constructed by the specific utility company's work forces. All costs for utility appurtenance relocation and adjustment work will be paid by the City as a direct bill from the utility company. A budget of 24 hours has been budgeted for this task I=E• I N T E R N A TI U N A L Proposal Engineering Services • Page 4 cn u — ll+KI �9LSIH01'1_ 311 Street Drainage Improvements • Log and field -classify soil materials encountered in each boring in accordance with the visual -manual procedures outlined in the Unified Soil Classification System and the ASTM D 2488-90. All field activities will be performed by or under the direct observation of a State of California Certified Engineering Geologist. • Collect representative bulk and undisturbed soil samples for laboratory analysis. Undisturbed samples will be retrieved at 2- to 5 -foot depth intervals utilizing a modified -California split -spoon sampler. • Perform appropriate laboratory analysis on soil samples which may include the following: in-situ and maximum dry density; in-situ and optimum moisture content; Atterberg limits; expansion potential; direct shear, soluble sulfate and chloride content, and general soil corrosivity (pH and minimum resistivity). • Perform geologic and engineering analysis on data collected. • Prepare a geotechnical report presenting the results of our evaluation and recommendations for the proposed pipeline in general conformance with the 2013 California Building Code (CBC) and in accordance with applicable state and local jurisdictional requirements. In general, the geotechnical report is expected to include the following information: • A description of site conditions and geotechnical factors that may influence site development. • A summary of subsurface conditions as encountered during our field exploration. • A geotechnical map depicting the locations of our exploratory investigation points. • Logs of the exploratory borings. • A description of laboratory test procedures and test results. • Site preparation, grading and ground modification requirements. • A preliminary discussion regarding temporary excavation stability and sidewall stabilization requirements (as necessary). • Acceptability of site soils for use as fill and backfill. • Presence of groundwater and its potential adverse impact on the site development. • A preliminary assessment of soil corrosivity and adverse effects on concrete and buried metallic objects. TASK 7 OFFSITE HYDROLOGY STUDY REVIEW Consultant shall review the Drainage Study prepared by the Client's previous engineer to verify the calculated flow -rates. Said drainage study was not approved, however it did receive one round of comments from Riverside County Flood Control District (RCFCD). Consultant shall review the assumptions made and determine if the results appear to be adequate. If it is determined that additional detail or analysis is required, Consultant shall prepare the necessary revisions and provide a supplemental document to the original study, which shall be used as the basis for the Hydrology and Hydraulic Design Report described below. TASK 8 HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN REPORT Consultant shall prepare a Hydrology and Hydraulic Design Report for the mainline storm drain, which will be subsequent to the Off -Site Hydrology Study prepared by the city's previous engineer and described above. The hydrology analysis and report for the local watershed shall use the rational method as outlined in the Riverside County Hydrology Manual. The storm drain system I N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L Proposal Engineering Services ux or_ rI rLi.siI RXI 3rd Street Drainage improvements Plot the record boundary lines on the aerial base map, with the understanding of the City that said record boundary is NOT the result of a comprehensive boundary survey and analysis, and that it's orientation may disagree substantially from the position determined by a full boundary survey and analysis; The budget for this scope of work is based upon an assumption that adequate and accessible boundary monumentation exists in the immediate project vicinity to control this record data survey. Any cost associated with the preparation and processing of a Record of Survey Map, if one becomes necessary as a legal requirement, shall be covered by the City. TASK 5 ADDITIONAL FIELD SURVEYING Consultant shall perform a field survey of the project site to facilitate engineering design. The workflow is as follows: Perform the following: Field survey to downloading, reduction and quality control conversion to CAD data base and mapping base plans; locate items affecting design; office of the digital survey data; and data for integration with engineering design • Archive survey field notes. The location of the following ground surface and/or visible underground items is the primary target of this survey: • Existing storm drain system; • Water meters; • Manholes; • Electrical and other above ground dry utility items; • Sewer cleanouts (if any); • Driveways; • Other items affecting design that are not shown on the aerial topographic base map due to dense vegetation. The following items are specifically not required and not included in this survey: • Street cross section's; • Item outside of the public street easement right-of-way. TASK 6 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Consultant has included Petra on the project team to perform a geotechnical investigation of the project site to facilitate engineering design. The workflow is as follows: Collect and review readily available literature and maps pertaining to soil and geologic conditions within and adjacent to the site. Review plans and project specifications made available to Consultant/Petra at the time of our investigation. Drill 7 exploratory borings, between 15 and 25 feet below ground surface. All borings will be drilled utilizing a standard, tract -mounted, hollow -stem auger drilling rig having the appropriate depth and sampling capabilities. Borings will be backfilled with excavated soils. I N T E R N A T I O N A L Proposal Engineering Services • Page 2 SCOPE OF WORK TASK 1 PROJECT KICKOFF MEETING 3r1 Street Drainage Improvements The project manager and key support staff will attend meetings with the City to update the City on progress. A kickoff meeting will be held with the City to review the scope of services and schedule. Two (2) progress meetings will be held with the City. In addition to the progress meetings, the Consultant's team will attend one (1) City Council meeting, if required. TASK 2 RESEARCH AND INVESTIGATION Consultant shall complete research and investigation of existing and future constraints and opportunities affecting the Project Site, including the following: • Research and investigation of existing and proposed major utilities within the Project Site. • Identification of requirements, jurisdictional agencies, and utility districts involved relative to the Project. • Review of existing improvement plans affecting the Project including, street and storm drain. • Plot existing utilities on the basemap in Autocad, as described in a later task, herein. A total of twenty hours (20) have been budgeted for this task. Additional research and investigation services will be performed, if required, on an hourly basis for an additional fee. TASK 3 AERIAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING Consultant shall prepare an Aerial Topographic Map of the project site, at a scale of 1 "=40', with one foot contour intervals. The work shall include: • Preparation of a flight plan and layout of ground control targets; • Field surveying services to set ground control panels and survey their precise positions on the appropriate coordinate system basis, • Aerial photogrammetric services; • Compilation of plannimetric and topographic features from controlled stereo pair photographs to digital medium; • Perform field survey check profile observations and office analysis of said observations to check ground truth of the compiled map within accepted standards. TASK 4 RECORD DATA MAP PREPARATION In order to include and plot the record position of the project boundary in approximate orientation with a specific coordinate system, compiled aerial topographic base data or other overlay features, Consultant shall perform the following tasks: Perform research of the available public records via on-line services to obtain maps and other items that affect the boundary location of the property; Prepare a preliminary record data map to be used by the field survey crew to search for a sampling of boundary monuments, Perform a field survey of said monuments in order to establish orientation of the record survey data in relation to the coordinate system used in the topographic mapping; I N T E R N A T I O N A L Proposal Engineering Services •Page 1 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES & FEE SCHEDULE EXHIBIT A IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above. "CITY" CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal corporation Grant Yates, City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - Consultant's Proposal Exhibit B - Subcontractors Listed "CONSULTANT" Michael Baker International, a Corporation John D. Tanner III, PE Vice President Page 10 of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 28. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. 29. Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ('Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. Consultant agrees to fully comply with all applicable federal and state labor laws (including, without limitation, if applicable, the Prevailing Wage Laws). It is agreed by the parties that, in connection with the Work or Services provided pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant shall bear all risks of payment or non-payment of prevailing wages under California law, and Consultant hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the City, and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. The foregoing indemnity shall survive termination of this Agreement. 30. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. .- . any obligation on the part of the City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law. 20. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement. 21. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 22. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Riverside. 23. Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. 24. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and share the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation. 25. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. 26. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment or otherwise take action on behalf of the City to make the following modifications to the Agreement: (a) a name change, (b) grant extensions of time; (c) non - monetary changes in the scope of services; and/or (d) suspend or terminate the Agreement. 27. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term G. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Consultant shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the City at all times during the term of this Agreement. 16. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section. If to City: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Manager 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 With a copy to: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Clerk 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 If to Consultant: Michael Baker International Attn: Mr. John Tanner III, PE 40810 County Center Dr., Suite 1000 Temecula, CA 92591 17. Entire Aqreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between the City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement. 18. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney. 19. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant and the subcontractors listed in Exhibit B. Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of any subcontractors. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement except as provided in Exhibit B without the written authorization of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of those subcontractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor nor shall it create Page 7 comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability. No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non -owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. Automobile liability coverage must be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 (ed. 12/90) Code 1 ("any auto"). No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage. iv. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate for Consultant's profession for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant's services under this Agreement, whether such services are provided by the Consultant or by its employees, subcontractors, or sub consultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims -made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single limit per occurrence basis. b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a Best's rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language: I. The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insured with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it. iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. V. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents. V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. The insurance provided by this Policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the City. Page 6 12. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations. 13. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has the licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Lake Elsinore business license. 14. Indemnity. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of and to the extent of Consultant's negligence or other wrongful conduct in the performance of this agreement or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such claim arising out the sole negligence, active negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers 15. Insurance Requirements. a. Insurance. Consultant, at Consultant's own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, unless modified by the City's Risk Manager, the following insurance policies. I. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or non -renewal of all Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for City. In the event that Consultant is exempt from Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California, Consultant shall submit to the City a Certificate of Exemption from Workers Compensation Insurance in a form approved by the City Attorney. ii. General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. Required commercial general liability coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form CG 0001 (ed. 11/88) or Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (ed. 1/73) covering Page 5 may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant's representatives, or Consultant's successor -in -interest. 8. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of the City. 9. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City. Notwithstanding any other federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits. 10. Interests of Consultant. Consultant (including principals, associates and professional employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant's services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement. Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant: a. will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of the City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and b. possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2).) 11, Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of expertise. Page 4 a. Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a nonexclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require that all subcontractors agree in writing that City is granted a nonexclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. b. Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs relating to project for which Consultant's services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant's services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City. Consultant's Books and Records. a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant to this Agreement. b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. C. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant's business, City Page 3 C. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall continue until the services and related work are completed in accordance with the Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). 3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the fees set forth in Consultants' Proposal (Exhibit A), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant's compensation exceed ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY THOUSAND SIXTEEN DOLLARS ($180,016) without additional written authorization from the City. Notwithstanding any provision of Consultant's Proposal to the contrary, out of pocket expenses set forth in Exhibit A shall be reimbursed at cost without an inflator or administrative charge. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment. 4. Method of Payment. Contractor shall promptly submit billings to the City describing the services and related work performed during the preceding month to the extent that such services and related work were performed. Contractor's bills shall be segregated by project task, if applicable, such that the City receives a separate accounting for work done on each individual task for which Contractor provides services. Contractor's bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Contractor no later than forty-five (45) days after receipt of the monthly invoice by City staff. 5. Suspension or Termination. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of such notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement, such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "Method of Payment" herein. 6. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notepad internal documents, shall become the property of the City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. City acknowledges that any use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein shall be at the sole risk of the City. City further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the City's use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein. Page 2 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL COMPANY Third Street Drainage Improvements, Project No. 4296 PS&E Design Services This Agreement for Professional Services (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of July 14, 2015, by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City") and Michael Baker International Company, a California Corporation ("Consultant"). RECITALS The City has determined that it requires the following professional services: Third Street Drainage Design. The scope of service includes: 100% PS&E, Survey and Mapping Utility Research & Coordination, Geotechnical Investigation Right-of-way, Hydrology & Hydraulics Construction Phase Support, Construction Drawings & Permit Plan Checks. A. Consultant has submitted to City a proposal, dated June 30, 2015, attached hereto as Exhibit A ("Consultant's Proposal") and incorporated herein, to provide professional services to City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to perform the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein. C. City desires to retain Consultant to perform the services as provided herein and Consultant desires to provide such professional services as set forth in this Agreement. AGREEMENT 1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services described in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). Consultant shall provide such services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A), subject to the direction of the City through its staff that it may provide from time to time. 2. Time of Performance. a. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. The time for completion of the professional services to be performed by Consultant is an essential condition of this Agreement. Consultant shall prosecute regularly and diligently the professional services contemplated pursuant to this Agreement according to the agreed upon performance schedule in Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). b. Performance Schedule. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit A). When requested by Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified may be approved in writing by the City Manager. PSA with Michael Baker 3rd St Drainage Page 1 Professional Services Agreement — Thirds Street Drainage Design July 14, 2015 Page 2 The PS&E scope of work shall include the following: Survey and Mapping Utility Research & Coordination Hydrology & Hydraulics Construction Phase Support Geotechnical Investigation Right-of-way Construction Drawings & Permits Plan Checks Construction is expected to begin in the spring of 2016 following approval of plan documents. Fiscal Impact This project is included in the adopted FY 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Program budget and will be financed by funds designated for flood control improvements. Prepared by: Mia Beltran Management Analyst Approved by: Jim Smith Interim Public Works Director Approved by: Jason Simpson Administrative Services Director Approved by: Grant Yates City Manager Attachments: Professional Services Agreement Michael Baker International Company Proposal CITY OF LADE LSII`IORf u DREAM EXFRLML- REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor And Members of the City Council FROM: Grant Yates City Manager DATE: July 14, 2015 PROJECT: Industrial Design Review 2015-01 - A Request for Approval of Building Design Plans for a 12,926 Square Foot Light Industrial Building. APPLICANT/ KLN Development, LLC, 28544 Old Town Front ST, STE 201 OWNER: Temecula, CA 92590 Recommendation The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2015- : A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Adopting Findings that Industrial Design Review No. 2015-01 is Consistent with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-_; A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approving of Industrial Design Review No. 2015-01 for the Development of a New 12,926 Square Foot Light Industrial Building on an Approximately 31,905 Square Foot Site Located at the Southwestern Corner of Minthorn and Birch Streets. Background On May 16, 2015, the City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2015-49 recommending that the City Council find that Industrial Design Review (IDR) No. 2015-01 is consistent with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Resolution No. 2015-50 approving Variance 2015-02, and Resolution No. 2015-51 recommending approval of IDR No. 2015-01 for Building Designs for the development of a new 12,926 Square Foot Light Industrial Building and associated improvements. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT IDR No. 2015-01 (Ness Industrial Garage) July 14, 2015 Page 2 of 4 Project Request and Location The applicant is requesting approval of building design plans for a 12,926 square foot (SF) light industrial building on an approximately 31,905 SF site located at the southwestern corner of Minthorn and Birch Streets (APN: 377-430-060). The subject site has a General Plan Land Use designation of Limited Manufacturing and has a zoning designation of M1 -Limited Manufacturing. Project Description The proposed project consists of the development of a 12,926 square foot multi -tenant light industrial building. The proposed design features a streamline "moderne" (a late more simplified variant of the art deco style) architectural style. The applicant has proposed a color scheme of light greens and grays which is appropriate to the proposed architectural style. The proposed design is authentic to the architectural style proposed and the use of architectural elements provides a well thought out design. The maximum height of the building marquees are 30'-0" and represents the highest point of the building. The building is centrally located on the property to provide adequate parking and circulation areas, bio -retention areas, and landscaping areas. The applicant initially proposed a building that met all the Municipal Code standards for the M-1 district. In review of the proposed project, the Fire Division expressed concerns with the minimum 24'-0" rear drive aisle adjacent to an existing building located on the property line to the west and the propensity for trucks and other vehicles using this area for loading. For this reason, at the request of staff, the applicant relocated the building five (5-0") feet closer to Minthorn Street, which reduced the landscaping buffer from 15'- 0" to 10-0" and necessitated the application for a variance. The required frontage improvements as conditioned include an additional landscape area of 4'0" which will reduce the visual impacts of the parking area. The variance was approved by the Planning Commission on June 16, 2015. The proposed lighting has been limited to the building mounted lights and has designed to provide adequate security lighting for the parking areas, while not spilling over the property lines. The proposed site design incorporates adequate space for safe and functional circulation. The proposed design creates a unique and attractive light industrial building, which is a departure from traditional concrete tilt up buildings. Analysis General Plan Consistency The subject lot has a General Plan land use designation of Limited Manufacturing. The General Plan establishes various compatible land uses including industrial parks. The proposed light industrial building and ancillary improvements are compatible with the CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT IDR No. 2015-01 (Ness Industrial Garage) July 14, 2015 Page 3 of 4 General Plan and the proposed use furthers the goals and objectives of the General Plan. The proposed project is found to be consistent with the General Plan. Municipal Code Consistency The subject lots are located within the M-1 (Limited Industrial) District. Within the M-1 various light industrial uses are identified as being permitted, and while no specific use has been proposed at this time, the proposed building provides adequate space for these uses to occur in the future. The proposed project provides an efficient and safe site plan that provides adequate circulation. The subject use is permitted in the M-1 district and the proposed development complies with all applicable development standards, except for the proposed variance, therefore the proposed project is found to be consistent with the Municipal Code. Summary The proposed infill development has been found to be consistent with the General Plan and Municipal Code. The Design Review Committee that includes staff from Planning, Building and Safety, Fire and Engineering have reviewed the requested Design Review application, and support the proposed application. Appropriate Conditions of Approval have been included that would mitigate any potential issues associated with the future development and establishment of use. Environmental Determination Staff has determined that the proposed project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Publ. Res. Code §§21000 et seq.:"CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines (14. Cal. Code Regs §§15000 et sec.), specifically pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32 — In -Fill Development Projects) because the Project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and policies, as well as zoning designation and regulations, the Project is within the City's boundaries and on a site less than five acres surrounded by urban uses, the Property has no value as habitat, and approval of the Project will not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality and the Project is adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Fiscal Impact The time and costs related to processing Industrial Design Review No. 2015-01 has been covered by the Developer Deposit paid for by the applicant. No General Fund budgets have been allocated or used in the processing of this application. The proposed Industrial Design Review No. 2015-01 is also conditioned for payment of all applicable development impact fees at the rate in effect at the time of payment. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT IDR No. 2015-01 (Ness Industrial Garage) July 14, 2015 Page 4 of 4 Prepared by: Justin Kirk Senior Planner Reviewed by: Richard MacHott, LEED Green Associate Planning Manager Grant Taylor Community Development Director Approved by: Grant Yates City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Aerial Map 3. CC Resolution — MSHCP 4. CC Resolution - IDR 5. Conditions of Approval 6. Architectural Plans 7. Planning Commission Staff Report 6-16-15 VICINITY MAP INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 PROJECT SITE 0 CITY OF LAlu LS 1 110 DIUAM E,)(l UM] Attachment 1 AERIAL MAP INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 CITY OF L(_ LSi lOkL' Attachment 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2015- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS THAT INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2015-01 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN WHEREAS, KLN Development, LLC, has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore and is requesting approval of Industrial Design Review No. 2015-01 for a 12,926 square foot (SF) light industrial building on an approximately 31,905 SF site located at the southwestern corner of Minthorn and Birch Streets., specifically referred to as APN: 377-430-060. The subject site has a General Plan Land Use designation of Limited Manufacturing and has a Zoning designation of M-1 (Limited Manufacturing); and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) requires that all discretionary projects within an MSHCP criteria cell undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process ("LEAP") and Joint Project Review ("JPR") to analyze the scope of the proposed development and establish a building envelope that is consistent with the MSHCP criteria; and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP further requires that the City of Lake Elsinore adopt consistency findings demonstrating that the proposed discretionary entitlement complies with the MSCHP cell criteria, and the MSCHP goals and objectives; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Chapter 17.184 (Design Review) the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the industrial design review; and WHEREAS, on June 1611, 2015, at a duly noticed public hearing the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-49 recommending that the City Council adopt findings that Industrial Design Review No. 2015-01 is consistent with the MSCHP; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.184.090 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code ("LEMC') the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has the responsibility of making decisions to approve, modify or disapprove recommendations of the Planning Commission for commercial design review applications; and WHEREAS, on July 14, 2015, at a duly noticed public meeting, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 2 OF 5 NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council has considered the Project and its consistency with the MSHCP. SECTION 2. That in accordance with the MSHCP, the City Council makes the following findings for MSHCP consistency: The Project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City must make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval. Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Resolution, the Project is required to be reviewed for MSHCP consistency, including consistency with other "Plan Wide Requirements." The Project site lies is not located within a MSHCP Criteria Cell. Based upon the site reconnaissance survey there are no issues regarding consistency with the MSCHP's other "Plan Wide Requirements." The only requirements potentially applicable to the Project were the Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines (Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP) and payment of the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee (Section 4 of the MSHCP Ordinance). The Project site is located within an industrial area, and has no habitat present on site, including riparian/riverine areas or vernal pools. 2. The Project is subject to the City's LEAP and the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority's (RCA) Joint Project Review processes. As stated above, the Project is not located within a Criteria Cell and therefore the Project was not processed through the City's LEAP and a Joint Project Review. The Project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools Guidelines. The site reconnaissance survey revealed that no riparian, riverine, vernal pool/fairy shrimp habitat or other aquatic resources exist on the site. As such, the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP are not applicable. 4. The Project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines. The site does not fall within any Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Areas. Neither a habitat assessment nor further focused surveys are required for the Project. Therefore, Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 3 OF 5 as set forth in Section 6.1.3 of the MSHCP are not applicable to the Project. 5. The Project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. The MSHCP only requires additional surveys for certain species if the Project is located in Criteria Area Species Survey Areas, Amphibian Species Survey Areas, Burrowing Owl Survey Areas, and Mammal Species Survey Areas of the MSHCP. The Project site is not located within any of the Critical Species Survey Areas. Therefore, the provisions of MSCHP Section 6.3.2 are not applicable. 6. The Project is consistent with the UrbantWildlands Interface Guidelines. The Project site is not within or adjacent to any MSHCP criteria or conservation areas. Therefore, the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines of MSHCP Section 6.1.4 are not applicable. 7. The Project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements. There are no resources located on the Project site requiring mapping as set forth in MSCHP Section 6.3.1. 8. The Project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines. The Project site is not within or adjacent to any MSHCP criteria or conservation areas. Therefore, the Fuels Management Guidelines of MSHCP Section 6.4 are not applicable. 9. The Project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. As a condition of approval, the Project will be required to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee at the time of issuance of building permits. 10. The Project is consistent with the MSHCP. SECTION 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented and the above findings, the City Council finds that the Project is consistent with the MSHCP. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 4 OF 5 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 14th day of July, 2015. Steve Manos, Mayor City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Leibold, City Attorney CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 5 OF 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE I SS I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2015-_ was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 26th day of May, 2015 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2015- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2015-01 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW 12,926 SQUARE FOOT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ON AN APPROXIMATELY 31,905 SQUARE FOOT SITE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWESTERN CORNER OF MINTHORN AND BIRCH STREETS. WHEREAS, KLN Development, LLC, has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore and is requesting approval of Industrial Design Review No. 2015-01 for building design plans for a 12,926 square foot (SF) light industrial building on an approximately 31,905 SF site located at the southwestern corner of Minthorn and Birch Streets, specifically referred to as APN: 377-430-060; and WHEREAS, the proposed project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Publ. Res. Code §§21000 et seq.:"CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines (14. Cal. Code Regs §§15000 et sec.), specifically pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32 — In -Fill Development Projects); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Chapter 17.184 (Design Review) the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the industrial design review, and WHEREAS, on June 16, 2015 at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-51 recommending that the City Council approve Industrial Design Review No. 2015-01; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.184.090 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code ("LEMC') the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has the responsibility of making decisions to approve, modify or disapprove recommendations of the Planning Commission for industrial design review applications; and WHEREAS, on July 14, 2015 at a duly noticed public meeting, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council has considered the proposed design for Industrial Design Review No. 2015-01 for a 12,926 square foot (SF) light industrial building and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission has reviewed and analyzed the proposed project pursuant to the California Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 65000 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 2 OF 4 et sec.), the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and finds and determines that the proposed Industrial Design Review No. 2015-01 is consistent with the requirements of California Planning and Zoning Law and with the goals and policies of the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. SECTION 2. The City Council finds and determines that California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Publ. Res. Code §§21000 et seq.: 'CEQX) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14. Cal. Code Regs §§15000 et sec.), specifically pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32 — In -Fill Development Projects) because the Project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and policies, as well as zoning designation and regulations, the Project is within the City's boundaries and on a site less than five acres surrounded by urban uses, the Property has no value as habitat, and approval of the Project will not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality and the Project is adequately served by all required utilities and public services. SECTION 3. That in accordance with Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter 17.184, the City Council makes the following findings regarding Industrial Design Review No. 2015-01: 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the zoning district in which the project is located. The proposed light industrial building and ancillary improvements are compatible with the General Plan and the proposed use furthers the goals and objectives of the General Plan, and the proposed project is found to be consistent with the General Plan. The subject use is permitted in the M-1 district and the proposed development complies with all applicable development standards or has requested approval of the necessary variance. The proposed project is therefore found to be consistent with the Municipal Code. 2. The project complies with the design directives and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The proposed project provides a design that incorporates varied building planes to break up the monotony, varied roof lines, and the incorporation of other architectural treatments that provide a high quality design. The proposed project has been centrally located on the property in order to mitigate massing along the property lines. Landscaping has been fully developed to mitigate visual impacts. The proposed project has been designed in such a manner as to mitigate all potential visual impacts associated with mechanical equipment. 3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.184.070 of the Municipal Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the Project to ensure CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 3 OF 4 development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.184. Pursuant to Section 17.184.070 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Project been considered by the City Council at a duly noticed public meeting on July 14, 2015. The proposed project, as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City divisions, departments and agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment. Furthermore, appropriate Conditions of Approval have been included that would mitigate any potential issues associated with the future development and establishment of use. SECTION 4. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the attached conditions of approval, the City Council hereby approves Industrial Design Review No. 2015-01. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 14th day of July, 2015. Steve Manos, Mayor City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO, 2015 - PAGE 4 OF 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Leibold, City Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SS CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2015-_ was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of July, 2015 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) GENERAL CONDITIONS The proposed project (Industrial Design Review No. 2015-01) consists of the development of a new 12,926 square -foot light industrial building located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Minthorn and Birch Streets (APN: 377- 430-060. 2. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the proposed project attached hereto. 3. The applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" form within 30 days of approval of the proposed project by the City Council and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 4. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $50.00 made payable to the County of Riverside for the filing of a Notice of Determination. The check shall be submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the project's approval. PLANNING DIVISION Industrial Design Review No. 2015-01 shall lapse and become void two (2) years following the date on which the design review became effective, unless one of the following: (1) prior to the expiration of two years, a building permit related to the design review is issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion; or (2) prior to the expiration of two years, the applicant has applied for and has been granted an extension of the design review approval pursuant to subsections (B) and (C) of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Section 17.184.120. Notwithstanding conditions to the contrary, a design review granted pursuant to LEMC Chapter 17.184 shall run with the land for this two- year period, subject to any approved extensions, and shall continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the site which was the subject of the design review application. Planning Commission Page 1 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) 6. All Conditions of approval shall be reproduced on page one of building plans prior to their acceptance by the Building and Safety Division, Community Development Department, All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved building plans, as modified by these conditions of approval. 8. Any minor revisions to approved site plan or building elevations shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director or designee. Any substantial revisions to the site plan or building elevations shall be reviewed according to the provisions of the Municipal Code in a similar manner as a new application. 9. All roof mounted or ground support air conditioning units or other mechanical equipment incidental to development shall be architecturally screened or shielded by landscaping so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Any roof mounted central swamp coolers shall also be screened, and the Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permit shall approve screening plan. 10. All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture. 11. The property address (in numerals at least six inches high) shall be displayed near the entrance and be easily visible from the front of the subject property and public right-of-way. 12. The applicant shall construct the trash enclosure with a decorative roof to match the colors and materials of the proposed project. 13. All exterior downspouts shall be concealed within the buildings or shall be incorporated in the architectural elements of the overall building. 14. Three (3) sets of the Final Landscaping/Irrigation Detail Plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department with appropriate fees, reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and the Community Development Director or designee, prior to issuance of a building permit. A Cost Estimate for materials and labor shall also be submitted for review and approval. Planning Commission Page 2 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) A Landscape Plan Check fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval based on the Consultant's fee, inspection, and permit and administration fees. • All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with 100% plant coverage. No turf shall be included in the final landscape plan, except in those areas identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). • All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six inch (6") high and six inch (6") wide concrete curb. • The applicant shall ensure a clear line of sight at ingress/egress points by providing plantings within 15 feet of ingress/egress points whose height does not exceed three feet and whose canopy does not fall below six feet. • Landscape planters shall be planted with an appropriate parking lot shade tree pursuant to the LEMC and Landscape Design Guidelines. • Any transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan and screened as part of the landscaping plan. • The landscape plan shall provide for California native drought -tolerant ground cover, shrubs, and trees. Special attention to the use of Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive watering. • All landscaping and irrigation shall comply with the water -efficient landscaping requirements set forth in LEMC Chapter 19.08 (Water Efficient Landscape Requirements), as adopted and any amendments thereto • All landscape improvements shall be bonded 100% for material and labor for two years from installation sign -off by the City. Release of the landscaping bond shall be requested by the applicant at the end of the required two years with approval/acceptance by the Landscape Consultant and Community Development Director or Designee. • All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. • Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan. • Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details. 15. The Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances and regulations of other City Departments. Planning Commission Page 3 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) 16. The applicant or designee shall submit an application for a sign permit, pay appropriate fees and receive approval from the Community Development Department for any sign(s) installed at the project site. 17. Any freestanding signage shall conform to the ultimate street widening improvements so as to achieve setback requirements applicable at that time. 18. All walls or fences located in any front yard shall not exceed thirty-six inches (36") in height with the exception that wrought -iron fences may be five feet (5') in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited. 19. All walls and/or fencing need to be located off the property line. If the Applicant proposes to place any walls and/or fencing on the property line he/she must submit a notarized agreement between the subject property owner and the adjacent property owner to the Planning Department prior to installing the fence. 20. The project shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 17 - Zoning unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 21. The project shall connect to sewer and meet all requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). The applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to the EVMWD and shall incorporate all district conditions and standards. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION 22. Any and all existing or proposed public areas shall be made accessible in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 23. The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the project site identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity (i.e., 7:00 A.M. — 7:00 P.M., Monday through Saturday with no construction activity to occur on Sundays or legal holidays) and a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division (951) 674-3124. The sign shall be installed prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Planning Commission Page 4 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) 24. Any and all improvements shall be in compliance with the 2013 California Building Code (CBC). Green building will be required. 25. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid. 26. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, applicant shall provide assurance that the Public Building Impact Fee has been paid. 27. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall provide assurance that the Library Capital Improvement Fund fee has been paid. 28. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall provide assurance that all Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan fees have been paid. 29. All approvals from all departments have to be signed off before issuing Building Permits. 30. Health Department approval before issuing Building Permits. ENGINEERING DIVISION GENERAL 31. All drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards and hydrology manual. 32. Developer shall mitigate to prevent any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or diversion of drainage. 33. All natural drainage traversing the site (historic flow) shall be conveyed through the site in a manner consistent with the historic flow or to one or a combination of the following: to a public facility; accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance; or conveyed to a drainage easement as approved by the City Engineer. 34. All required soils, geology, hydrology and hydraulic and seismic reports shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. Planning Commission Page 5 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) 35. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). 36. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) on site and/or out on the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. Overhead utilities (34 KV or lower) shall be undergrounded. Temporary power shall be installed per the requirements of the Building Official. All power lines (temporary or permanent) shall comply with CALTRANS standards for vehicle clearance. 37. The applicant shall install blue dot markers in the roadway at a right angle to Fire Hydrant locations per Riverside County Standards. 38. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated both during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction and during occupancy. 39. Sight distance into and out of this project location shall comply with CALTRANS Standards. 40. Developer to seek a shared driveway agreement with the property owner of APN 374-430-076. If an agreement cannot be secured, the Minthorn driveway will have to be relocated to the NW. All modifications to the driveway shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Fire Marshall or their designees. FEES: 41. The applicant shall pay all Engineering Division assessed Capital Improvement, Plan Check and Permit fees (LEMC 16.34). Applicable mitigation fees include: • Stephens Kangaroo Habitat Fee (K -Rat): $500 per gross acre; • Traffic Infrastructure Fee (TIF): $.81 per square foot (industrial) of buildings. • Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF): Industrial SF GFA $ 1.73 • Drainage Fee: $2,595/per gross acre (Warm Springs East District) 42. Development impact fees quoted are subject to change. Fees will be assessed Planning Commission Page 6 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) at the prevalent rate at time of payment in full. FLOOD PLAIN: 43. A completed Elevation Certificate for insurance purposes will be required prior to the first occupancy. Please submit to the Engineering Department. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT / POLLUTION PREVENTION / NPDES Design: 44. The project is responsible for complying with the Santa Ana Region NPDES Permits as warranted based on the nature of development and/or activity. These Permits include: • General Permit -Construction • General Permit - Industrial • Scrap Metal • Deminimus Discharges • MS4 45. The 2010 SAR MS4 Permit requires implementation of LID Principles and LID Site Design, where feasible, to treat the pollutants of concern identified for the project, in the following manner (from highest to lowest priority) : (Section XII. E. 2, XI1.E.3,and XII. E. 7) • Evaluation of highest and best use for sites discharging to Lake Elsinore. • Preventative measures (these are mostly non-structural measures, e.g., preservation of natural features to a level consistent with the MEP standard; minimization of Urban Runoff through clustering, reducing impervious areas, etc.) • The Project shall `Infiltrate, harvest and use, evapotranspire and/or bio -treat the Design Capture Volume (DCV). • The Project shall consider a properly engineered and maintained bio -treatment system only if infiltration, harvesting and use and Planning Commission Page 7 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) evapotranspiration cannot be feasibly implemented at the project site. Any portion of [the DCV] that is not infiltrated, harvested and used, evapotranspired, and/or biotreated shall be treated and discharged in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section XII.G. 46. The project shall implement LID practices that treat the 85th percentile storm. 47. Parking lot landscaping shall be designed to provide for treatment, retention or infiltration of runoff. 48. Project hardscape areas shall be designed and constructed to provide for drainage into adjacent landscape. 49. Hydromodification / Hydraulic Conditions of Concern — The project shall identify potential Hydraulic Conditions of Concern (HCOC) and implement measures to limit disturbance of natural water bodies and drainage systems; conserve natural areas; protect slopes, channels and minimize significant impacts from urban runoff. 50. CEQA — If CEQA identifies resources requiring Clean Water Act Section 401 Permitting, the applicant shall obtain certification through the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and provide a copy to the Engineering Division. 51. The project shall use either volume -based and/or flow -based criteria for sizing BMPs in accordance with NPDES Permit Provision XII.D.4. Construction: 52, A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post construction is required for this project. 53. Erosion & Sediment Control - Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by the City Engineer, an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan as a separate sheet of the grading plan submittal to demonstrate compliance with the City's NPDES Program, California Building Code, and state water quality regulations for grading and construction activities. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall identify how all Planning Commission Page 8 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) construction materials, wastes, grading or demolition debris, and stockpiles of soil, aggregates, soil amendments, etc, shall be property covered, stored and secured to prevent transport into local drainages or waters by wind, rain, tracking, or dispersion. The plan shall also describe how the project will ensure that all BMPs will be maintained during construction of any future right of ways. A copy of the plan shall be kept updated as needed to address changing circumstances of the project site, be kept at the project site and available for review upon request. Post Construction: 54. The applicant shall use the Santa Ana Region of Riverside County Water Quality Management Plan guidance document and template for WQMP preparation. 55. The project shall complete and submit for review and approval to the Engineering Division a final WQMP, incorporating the LID Principles and Stormwater BMPs. The final WQMP shall be approved prior to issuance of any grading or building permit. 56. WQMP — The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used onsite to control identified pollutants of concern. The applicant shall utilize the MS4 Permittee Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP), Model WQMP, and LID Guidance Manual for reference, and the MS4 Permittee's WQMP template for submittal. This WQMP shall include as applicable the following: • Detailed site and project description • Potential stormwater pollutants • Post -development drainage characteristics • Low Impact Development (LID) BMP selection and analysis • Structural and Non -Structural source control BMPs • Site design and drainage plan (BMP Exhibit) • Vector issues are addressed in the BMP design, operation and maintenance. • GIS coordinates for all LID and Treatment Control BMPs • HCOC - demonstrate that discharge flow rates, velocities, duration and volume for the post construction condition from a 2 year and 10 year 24 hour rainfall event will not cause significant adverse impacts on downstream erosion and receiving waters, or measures are Planning Commission Page 9 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) implemented to mitigate significant adverse impacts to downstream public facilities and water bodies. Design goal to replicate pre - development hydrologic regime. 57. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan that (1) describes the long-term operation and maintenance requirements for BMPs identified in the BMP Exhibit; (2) identifies the entity that will be responsible for long-term operation and maintenance of the referenced BMPs; (3) describes the mechanism for funding the long-term operation and maintenance of the referenced BMPs, and (4) provides for annual certification of water quality facilities by a registered civil engineer and/or the City for a fee if the service is available. 58. All storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately marked "Only Rain in the Storm Drain" using the City authorized marker to prevent illegal dumping in the drain system. 59. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of use and/or occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with applicable NPDES permits for construction, industrial/commercial, MS4, etc. to include: • Demonstrate that all structural Best Management Practices (BMP's) described in the BMP Exhibit from the project's approved WQMP have been implemented, constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and specifications. • Demonstrate that the project has complied with all non-structural BMPs described in the project's WQMP. • Provide signed, notarized certification from the engineer of work that the structural BMP's identified in the project's WQMP are installed and operational. • Submit a copy of the fully executed, recorded Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan for all structural BMPs. • Demonstrate that copies of the project's approved WQMP (with recorded O&M Plan attached) are available for each of the initial occupants (commercial/industrial) or Owner's Association as appropriate. • Agree to pay for a Special Investigation from the City of Lake Elsinore for a date twelve (12) months after the issuance of a Certificate of Use and/or Occupancy for the project to verify compliance with the approved WQMP and O&M Plan. A signed/sealed certification from the engineer of work dated 12 months after C of O will be considered Planning Commission Page 10 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) in lieu of a Special Investigation by the City. Provide a recorded copy of one of the following: 1. CC&R's (they must include the approved WQMP and O&M Plan) for the project's Owners Association. 2. A water quality implementation agreement has the approved WQMP and O&M Plan attached; or 3. The final approved Water Quality Management Plan and Operations and Maintenance Plan. 60. Industrial Facilities - For industrial facilities subject to California's General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity as defined by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code. 61. Prior to grading or building permit close-out and/or the issuance of a certificate of use and occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate that compliance with the permit has been obtained by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) Number or other proof of filing to the satisfaction of the NPDES Coordinator. IMPROVEMENTS: 62. If the existing street improvements are to be modified, the existing street plans on file shall be modified accordingly and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit. 63. The applicant shall install permanent center line ties per City of Lake Elsinore Standards at the intersection of the project entrances on Minthorn and Birch, and at the intersection of Minthorn and Birch. 64. An encroachment permit is required for all work to be done in the public right- of-way. Applicant shall submit the permit application, required fees and documents prior to issuance. 65. Applicant shall construct improvements to City Standard along the project frontage on Minthorn Street. New improvements to match or transition to existing improvements along the southern property boundary. Driveway approach to match City Standard 118B. Applicant shall be responsible for the Planning Commission Page 11 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approach and drainage improvements. 66. Applicant shall construct improvements to City Standard along the project frontage on Birch Street. New improvements to match or transition to existing improvements along the northern property boundary. Driveway approach to match City Standard 118B. Applicant shall be responsible for the installation of curb, gutter, driveway approach and drainage improvements. 67. All improvements must comply with current ADA standards. 68. Applicant shall submit signing and striping plans for City review and approval for Minthorn and Birch Streets. Plans shall include details of the secondary access showing compliance with sight distance standards, NPDES and Professional Traffic Consideration. 69. Provide public street lighting, consistent with California State Codes, Riverside County standard spacing and City Standards. 70. All existing storm drain inlet facilities adjacent to the subject properties shall be retrofitted with a storm drain filter; all new storm drain inlet facilities constructed by this project shall include a storm drain filter. 71. A secondary emergency access shall be provided. This secondary access shall be a permanent component of this project. 72. The secondary access road and parking lots shall be surfaced to comply with Engineering Division and Fire Department standards including sight distance requirements consistent with Caltrans Standards. At a minimum they shall be of compacted crushed aggregate base as approved by the City Engineer, and maintained to minimize dust and tracking. 73. A California Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare the improvement plans required for this project. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to the City Standards latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34) PRIOR TO GRADING PERMIT 74. Phasing plan, if any, shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of any permits. Planning Commission Page 12 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) 75. A grading plan signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted for City review and approval for all addition and/or movement of soil (grading) on the site. The plan shall include separate sheets for erosion control, haul route and traffic control. The grading submittal shall include all supporting documentation and be prepared using City standard title block, standard drawings and design manual (available at www.lake-elsinore.org). 76. All grading plan contours shall extend to minimum of 50 feet beyond property lines to indicate existing drainage pattern. 77. If the grading plan identifies alterations in the existing drainage patterns as they exit the site, a Hydrology and Hydraulic Report for review and approval by City Engineer shall be required prior to issuance of grading permits. All grading that modifies the existing flow patterns and/or topography shall be in compliance with federal, state and local law and be approved by the City Engineer. 78. The applicant shall apply for, obtain and submit to the City Engineering Division a letter from Southern California Edison (SCE) indicating that the construction activity will not interfere with existing SCE facilities (aka SCE NIL). 79. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer. Slopes steeper than 2 to 1 shall be evaluated for stability and proper erosion control and approved by the City. 80. A seismic study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults, liquefaction and/or subsidence zones present on-site. A certified letter from a registered geologist or geotechnical engineer shall be submitted confirming the absence of this hazard prior to grading permit. 81. The applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements and/or permits for off-site grading and the applicant shall accept drainage from the adjacent property owners prior to grading permit issuance. 82. Applicant shall execute and submit grading and erosion control agreement, post grading security and pay permit fees as a condition of grading permit issuance. 83. A preconstruction meeting with the City Public Works Inspector (Engineering Division) is required prior to commencement of ANY grading activity. Planning Commission Page 13 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) 84. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, applicant shall provide the City for review and approval a plan of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of import or export material. Export sites located within the Lake Elsinore City limits must have an active grading permit. Public Noticing and City Council approval is required for haul routes of over 5,000 cubic yards. The cost of noticing shall be paid by the applicant. 85. Applicant shall provide the city with a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) and Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) letter issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program prior to issuance of grading permit(s). 86. If applicable, approval of the project Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) (see General Construction Permit and California Green Building Standards Code) and erosion control plan shall be received and BMPs implemented prior to issuance of a grading permit. A copy of the current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for review upon request. 87. Approval of the project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post construction shall be received prior to issuance of a grading permit. 88. Submit written approval of environmental clearance to the Engineering Division. This approval shall identify and clear all proposed grading activity anticipated for this project. Any variation shall require an appropriate environmental clearance prior to issuance of a grading permit. 89. Applicant shall pay all grading permit applicable processing, permit, security and development fees including Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat prior to issuance of the grading permit. PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT 90. The applicant shall submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location, such as water pressure and volume, etc. Submit this letter to the Engineering Division prior to applying for a building permit. Planning Commission Page 14 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) 91. All required public right-of-way dedications and easements shall be prepared by the applicant or his agent and shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permit. 92. Provide soils, geology and seismic report, including recommendations for parameters for seismic design of buildings, and walls prior to building permit. 93. Prior to issuance of certificates of use and occupancy or building permits for individual tenant improvements or construction permits for a tank or pipeline, uses shall be identified and, for specified uses (where the proposed improvements will store, generate or handle hazardous materials in quantities that will require permitting and inspection once operational), the applicant shall propose plans and measures for chemical management (including, but not limited to, storage, emergency response, employee training, spill contingencies and disposal) to the satisfaction of the City Building Official(s). 94. Applicant shall pay all applicable processing and development fees including but not all inclusive: TUMF, MSHCP, TIF, and area drainage. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY/FINAL APPROVAL: 95. Final soil report showing compliance with recommendations, compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 Y2 x 11" mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection will be scheduled. 96. All required public right-of-way dedications, easements, dedications and vacations and easement agreement(s) for ingress and egress through adjacent property(ies)shall be recorded with a recorded copy provided to the City prior to final project approval. 97. Slope maintenance along right-of-ways and open spaces shall be maintained by the property owner. Documentation of maintenance responsibility shall be in a recordable format and recorded prior to occupancy/final. 98. All street improvements shall be completed in accordance with approved plans or as a condition of development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 99. All signing and striping and traffic control devices onsite and on Minthorn and Birch Streets shall be installed. Planning Commission Page 15 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) 100. Water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with Water District Requirements. 101. Prior to grading or building permit close-out and/or the issuance of a certificate of use or a certificate of occupancy, applicant shall: • Demonstrate that all structural BMPs have been constructed, installed and are functioning in conformance with approved plans and specifications and the WQMP; • Demonstrate that they are prepared to implement all non-structural BMPs included in the conditions of approval or building/grading permit conditions; • Demonstrate that an adequate number of copies of the approved project specific WQMP are available for the future owners/occupants; and • The applicant shall provide all education guidelines for Water Quality Management Practices to the tenants, operators and owners of the businesses of the development, regarding the environmental awareness on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the approved WQMP in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. Contact the City NPDES Coordinator for handout/guideline information. 102. Chemical management plans shall be approved by the County/City and other appropriate agencies such as County/City Fire Department, the Health Services Agency's Department of Environmental Health, and sewering and/or water agencies to ensure implementation of each agency's respective requirements. Approval by the appropriate agencies shall be furnished to the Engineering Division, prior to the issuance of any certificates of use and/or occupancy. 103. Certificates or permits may be ministerially withheld if features needed to properly manage chemicals cannot be incorporated into a previously completed building, center, or complex. 104. The property owner shall execute and cause to be recorded a "Covenant and Agreement" in the form provided by the City to inform future property owners of the requirement to implement the approved final project -specific WQMP. Planning Commission Page 16 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) 105. Applicant shall pay all outstanding applicable processing and development fees including but not all inclusive: TUMF, MSHCP, TIF, Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat and area drainage prior to occupancy/final approval. 106. As -built plans for all approved plan sets shall be submitted for review and approval by the City. The applicant/developer/owner is responsible for revising the original mylar plans. Once the original mylars have been approved, the applicant shall provide the City with a CD of the "as built' plans in .tif format. 107. All final studies and reports shall be submitted in .tif format on a CD/DVD. Studies and reports include, Soils, Seismic, Hydrology, Hydraulics, Grading, SWPPP, WQMP, etc. 108. Provide on compact disc GIS Shape files of all final maps and street and storm drain plans. *ALL DATA MUST BE IN projected Coordinate System: NAD 83 State Plane California Zone VI U.S. Fleet. FIRE DIVISION GENERAL CONDITIONS Lake Elsinore Fire Protection Planning Office Responsibility- It is the responsibility of the recipient of these Fire Department conditions to forward them to all interested parties. The permit number (as it is noted above) is required on all correspondence. Questions should be directed to the Riverside County Fire Department, Lake Elsinore Fire Protection Planning Division at 130 S. Main St., Lake Elsinore, CA 92530. Phone: (951) 671-3124 Ext. 225. The following fire department conditions shall be implemented in accordance with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the adopted codes at the time of project building plan submittal, these conditions are in addition to the adopted code requirements. 109. Blue Dot Reflectors- Blue retro -reflective pavement markers shall be mounted on private streets, public streets and driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. Prior to installation, placement of markers must be approved by the Riverside County Fire Dept. 110. Minimum Hydrant Fire Flow- Minimum required fire flow shall be 1,500 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. Average spacing Planning Commission Page 17 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) between hydrants 500' and 250' maximum distance from any point on the street or road frontage to hydrant. 111. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2") shall be located not less than 25 feet or more than 250 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travel ways. 112. Minimum Access Standards- The following access requirements are required to be implemented to ensure fire department and emergency vehicular access. All roadways shall conform to the City of Lake Elsinore approved roadway standards but in no case shall the minimum fire department vehicular access be less the following provisions: • Twenty-four feet (24') clear width. Where parking is to be provided, each parking side shall be provided with eight (8') additional feet on each side of the fire department access. • The required all weather vehicular access shall be able to support no less than 60,000 lbs. over 2 axles. • Roadway gradient shall not exceed 15% on any access road, driveways, and perimeter roads. • Turning Radius shall be 26' inside and 38' outside for all access roads. 113. Secondary Access- In the interest of Public Safety, this project shall provide an Alternate or Secondary Access. Said access shall be constructed in accordance to the City of Lake Elsinore Engineering Department standards to accommodate full fire response and community evacuation. 114. Automatic / Manual Gates- Gate entrances shall be at least two feet wider than the width of the traffic lane (s) serving that gate and no less than 20 feet wide. Any gate providing access from a road to a driveway shall be located at least 35 feet from the roadway and shall open to allow vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic on the road. Where a one-way road with a single traffic lane provides access to a gate entrance, a 40 foot turning radius shall be used. Gate access shall be equipped with a rapid entry system. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Automatic/manual gate pins shall be rated with shear pin force, not to exceed 30 foot pounds. Automatic gates shall be equipped with emergency backup power. Gates activated by the rapid entry system shall remain open until closed by the rapid entry system. Contact the Fire Planning office for current plan check fees. Planning Commission Page 18 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE 115. Plan Check Fee- Building plan check fees shall be made payable to the "City of Lake Elsinore", and shall be submitted to the Fire Department at the time of plan submittal. 116. Water System Plans- Applicant and/or developer shall submit 2 sets of water system plans to the Fire Department for review. The plans must be signed by a registered Civil Engineer and/or water purveyor prior to Fire Department review and approval. Mylars will be signed by the Fire Department after review and approval. Two (2) copies of the signed and approved water plans shall be returned to the Fire Department before release of a building permit. 117. Prior to Building Construction Verification- This project shall be inspected and approved by the Fire Marshal or designee prior to bringing combustible materials on site. During said inspection all permanent road signs shall be in place, all hydrants shall on operating and approved for use by the water purveyor, and all permanent road surfaces shall be completed including primary and secondary access circulation. PRIOR TO BUILDING FINAL INSPECTION 118. Fire Sprinkler System 13- Install a complete fire sprinkler system designed in accordance with California Building Code, California Fire Code and adopted standards. Sprinkler systems with pipe sizes larger than 4 inches in diameter will require the Engineer or Architect of Record certification with details and calculations with "wet signature" that the building structural system is designed to support the seismic and gravity loads for the support of the additional weight of the sprinkler system. The PIV and FDC shall be located to the front of the building in an approved location, unobstructed and within 50 feet of an approved road or driveway, within 200 feet of a hydrant. A C-16 licensed contractor must submit plans, along with the current fee, to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation. 119. Sprinkler System Monitoring- Install an alarm monitoring system forfire sprinkler system(s) with 20 or more heads. Valve monitoring, water -flow alarm and trouble signals shall be automatically transmitted to an approved central station, remote station or proprietary monitoring station in accordance with California Building Code, California Fire Code and adopted standards. An approved audible sprinkler flow alarm shall be provided on the exterior in an approved Planning Commission Page 19 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW 2015-01 (NESS INDUSTRIAL GARAGE) location. The location of the Fire Alarm Control Unit shall be located in an environmentally controlled location in accordance with 10.14 (NFPA 72, 2013). A C-10 licensed contractor must submit plans designed in accordance with adopted standards, along with the current fee, to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation. 120. Designated Fire Lanes- The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/ or signs. 121. Knox Rapid Entry Box- A rapid entry Knox Box shall be installed on the outside of the building. Key(s) shall have durable and legible tags affixed for identification of the correlating tenant space. Special forms are available from this office for ordering the Knox Box. If the building/facility is protected with a fire alarm or burglar alarm system, it is recommended that the lock box be "tamper" monitoring. 122. Fire Extinguishers — Minimum Install portable fire extinguishers complying with Section 906 of the 2013 California Fire Code with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC and signage. Planning Commission Page 20 of 20 City Council June 16, 2015 July 14, 2015 4 uauv H JaIIVM , Iik 'A wogJUTA pue yo.aig � f ° D t iC: S — gg ilae siie �E SIy f y II �r. � •s IµG`1bj1 i W L {a R E U LO r 3, �?, P4 3 ° r 4 Via, i ,. Ofo2 YspE iEEf Ildldl yr t 8 f # spy 3#354,E,;;'at ,7 S U 1 gg I: I VIV uallt/ H ��IIoM ��� i� ftie UJOCL I{)UI�J (AUL' y�JlB f e —_ 0 i cj , t Y i ,I n I i n f � I'J i t � I is e I 3 i b �1 p s s } C0�O UjoglulW,-pUU' L40ile F M i.P., r 0 I p le .. k V 0 �i I� ...._ .:.:. 0 Rol gig I Nit 1)\� � 11 a \)� 011'1M�fflOO N89 38N 03UHM Id OSONV _ df1OUD VFJOWVHIV ;� `� "Q , Maim NHOHINIW ONV y Z 4 J d Z Z ���yz� l' a. 'Sae q,cvi aa .. Q Z FSE ra aa i Syxy U 51x \l § &u. wo u wp \ \/ \ 7»-- »� - 2 » � _ am »<«:: -- _ . � .=v yy v. § : am§ . . \- \\�� - � � , � \ - \- H W w Q z0 wm 0 LU = J H d Z � 0 z Q = W U� � Q u m x LW m W Z C a a3: 0 O OZ w F w m� ZW _a a� �0 O LULU W w XN W CITY OF LCLLSIROP\.E `v DREAM EX'iRI:ME� CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: Honorable Chairman Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Richard J. MacHott, LEED Green Associate Planning Manager DATE: June 16, 2015 PROJECT: Industrial Design Review 2015-01 and Variance 2015-02 - A Request for Approval of Building Design Plans for a 12,926 Square Foot Light Industrial Building. APPLICANT/ KLN Development, LLC, 28544 Old Town Front ST, STE 201 OWNER: Temecula, CA 92590 Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: Adopt Resolution No. 2015- : A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Recommending that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Adopt Findings that Industrial Design Review 2015-01 and Variance No. 2015-02 are Consistent with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2015 - _; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, Approving Variance 2015-02 to Allow a Five (5'-0") Encroachment into the Required 15'-0" Landscape Setback from the Edge of Right -of -Way Located at the Southwestern Corner of Minthorn and Birch Streets. 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Industrial Design Review No. 2015-01 for the Development of a New 12,926 Square Foot Light Industrial Building on an Approximately 31,905 Square Foot Site Located at the Southwestern Corner of Minthorn and Birch Streets. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT IDR No. 2015-01 & Var 2015-02 June 16, 2015 Page 2 of 5 Project Request and Location The applicant is requesting a variance to permit a five (5'-0") encroachment into the required 15'-0" landscape setback for parking lots adjacent to streets and approval of building design plans for a 12,926 square foot (SF) light industrial building on an approximately 31,905 SF site located at the southwestern corner of Minthorn and Birch Streets (APN: 377-430-060). The subject site has a General Plan Land Use designation of Limited Manufacturing and has a zoning designation of M1 -Limited Manufacturing. Environmental Setting EXISTING LAND USE ` ` GENERAL PLAN ZONING Project Site Vacant Limited Manufacturing M-1 Limited Manufacturing) North Industrial Limited Manufacturin M-1 (Limited Manufacturing) South Industrial Limited Manufacturing M-1 Limited Manufacturing) East Vacant Limited Manufacturing M-1 (Limited Manufacturing) West Industrial Limited Manufacturing M-1 Limited Manufacturing) Project Description The proposed project consists of the development of a 12,926 square foot multi -tenant light industrial building. The proposed design features a streamline "moderne" (a late more simplified variant of the art deco style) architectural style. The applicant has proposed a color scheme of light greens and grays which is appropriate to the proposed architectural style. The design incorporates metal accents in the form of wings at the top of the architectural columns, exposed downspouts, window framing, aluminum doors, and diamond plating adjacent to the rollup doors on the rear of the building. In addition the design includes tiling at the base of the architectural columns and building sign marquees on the front and sides of the building. The proposed design is authentic to the architectural style proposed and the use of architectural elements provides a well thought out design. The proposed building features a flat roof with a parapet wall which extends above the roof with a maximum height of the parapet walls of 24'-6" to provide adequate screening for any roof top equipment. The maximum height of the building marquees are 30'-0" and represents the highest point of the building. The building is centrally located on the property to provide adequate parking and circulation areas, bio - retention areas, and landscaping areas. The applicant initially proposed a building that met all the Municipal Code standards for the M-1 district. In review of the proposed project, the Fire Division expressed concerns with the minimum 24'-0" rear drive aisle adjacent to an existing building located on the property line to the west and the propensity for trucks and other vehicles using this area for loading. For this reason, at the request of staff, the applicant relocated the building five (5'-0") feet closer to Minthorn Street, which reduced the landscaping buffer from 15'- 0" to 10-0" and necessitated the application for a variance. The proposed lighting has PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT IDR No. 2015-01 & Var 2015-02 June 16, 2015 Page 3 of 5 been limited to the building mounted lights and has designed to provide adequate security lighting for the parking areas, while not spilling over the property lines. The proposed site design incorporates adequate space for safe and functional circulation. The proposed design creates a unique and attractive light industrial building, which is a departure from traditional concrete tilt up buildings. Analysis General Plan Consistency The subject lot has a General Plan land use designation of Limited Manufacturing. The General Plan establishes various compatible land uses including industrial parks. The Floor Area Ratio (FAR)' for this designation shall not exceed 0.45, the proposed project proposes a FAR of 0.40. Goal 1 of the Community Form section of the General Plan seeks to create a diverse and integrated balance of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, public, and open space uses. This goal is implemented through various policies including Policy 1.4 which encourages the development of a mix of industrial uses including light industrial, clean manufacturing, technology, research and development, medium industrial and extractive uses. The proposed light industrial building and ancillary improvements are compatible with the General Plan and the proposed use furthers the goals and objectives of the General Plan. The proposed project is found to be consistent with the General Plan. Municipal Code Consistency The subject lots are located within the M-1 (Limited Industrial) District. Within the M-1 various light industrial uses are identified as being permitted, and while no specific use has been proposed at this time, the proposed building provides adequate space for these uses to occur in the future. Chapter 17.148 Parking Requirements establishes the minimum parking to be provided for manufacturing uses as one parking space per 500 SF of unit area for up to 20,000 SF, which translates to a 26 parking space requirement. The proposed project incorporates 26 parking spaces (22 head in and 4 parallel), thus making the project consistent with the parking requirements of the Municipal Code. Staff has reviewed the proposed project with respect to the relevant development standards as identified in the Municipal Code and has detailed the requirements and the proposed development standards as follows: 'A floor area ratio is the numerical value obtained by dividing the ggross building square footage on a lot by the net square footage of the lot. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT IDR No. 2015-01 & Var 2015-02 June 16, 2015 Page 4 of 5 Development Standard Required Proposed Buildin Height 40'-0" 30'-0" Front Setback 15-0" 54'-0" Side Setback (from ROW)** 15-0" 15'-0"" Side Setback** N/A 24'-0" Rear Setback (N/A)** N/A 24'-0" **Side and Rear Yard. No setback shall be required from interior lot lines except adjacent to a public right-of-way or a residential use, in which case the minimum setback shall be 15 feet. (LEMC Section 17.124.060 (B)) As detailed, the proposed project meets all applicable development standards for the M- 1 District. The Municipal Code requirement of a minimum of 15'-0" and an average 20'- 0" (measured from the edge of the road right-of-way) to screen parking areas has been proposed to be reduced to 10'-0" to incorporate adequate circulation for fire vehicles, as requested by staff. The required frontage improvements as conditioned include an additional landscape area of 4'0" which will reduce the visual impacts of the parking area. The total area of landscaping and plant selections provide adequate screening. The proposed project provides an efficient and safe site plan that provides adequate circulation. The subject use is permitted in the M-1 district and the proposed development complies with all applicable development standards, except for the proposed variance; therefore the proposed project is found to be consistent with the Municipal Code. Summary The proposed infill development has been found to be consistent with the General Plan and Municipal Code. The Design Review Committee that includes staff from Planning, Building and Safety, Fire and Engineering have reviewed the requested Design Review application, and support the proposed application. Appropriate Conditions of Approval have been included that would mitigate any potential issues associated with the future development and establishment of use. Environmental Determination Staff has determined that the proposed project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Publ. Res. Code §§21000 et seq.:"CEQX) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14. Cal. Code Regs §§15000 et seq.), specifically pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32 — In -Fill Development Projects) because the Project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and policies, as well as zoning designation and regulations, the Project is within the City's boundaries and on a site less than five acres surrounded by urban uses, the Property has no value as habitat, and approval of the Project will not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality and the Project is adequately served by all required utilities and public services. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT IDR No. 2015-01 & Var 2015-02 June 16, 2015 Page 5 of 5 PREPARED BY: Justin Kirk, Senior Planner APPROVED BY: Richard J. MacHott, LEED Green Associate Planning Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Planning Commission Resolutions 4. Conditions of Approval 5. Project Plans ' yRC Agenda Date: 7/14/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 5) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 15-666 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w .lake-elsinore org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report Cityo/ Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 71912015 CITY OF inn LADE �LSIIYOF�E �u DREAM EXTREME, REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Award Agreement for Professional Services for Third Street Drainage Design Services Recommendations Award Agreement for Professional Services to Michael Baker International Company for the Design of the Third Street Drainage Improvement project. 2. Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in the amount of $180,016 to Michael Baker International Company, in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. Background The Third Street watershed, located east of Interstate 15, was the subject of a focused drainage study to evaluate the impacts of proposed developments in the area. A subsequent hydrology analysis and preliminary design of the preferred storm drain plan alternative were finalized in May 2015. Discussion On June 16, 2015, engineering staff received three design proposals to provide Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) from pre -qualified professional Civil Engineering firms. In accordance with the Request for Proposal, Michael Baker International Company was selected based on the following criterion: project understanding, deliverable plan, resource allocation, and deliverable schedule. CITY or LADE LSINORE �:�'� DREAM EXTR6MGn REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Amendment No. 1 to Agreement for Professional Services with Civil Source. Inc. Recommendations Staff recommends the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to approve the second year of the Agreement for Professional Services with Civil Source, Inc., for project management and engineering services, in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. Background On July 22, 2014, the City entered into an Agreement for Professional Services (PSA) in an amount not to exceed $178,000 with Civil Source, Inc. for project management and engineering services. The term of the PSA is for a period of one (1) year, which may be extended annually for a total of three (3) years. A project manager has been provided at the hourly rate of $85 per hour. Discussion Mr. Solanki of Civil Source provides full-time project management and engineering consulting services for the majority of the City's CIP projects. The Engineering Division of the Public Works Department is currently recruiting for its one and only budgeted Civil Engineer position. The FY 2015/2016 CIP budget exceeds $65 million and includes pavement management program, alignment studies, master plans, parks, lake, storm drains, streets, and facilities projects. The volume of current and future projects exceeds the availability of current permanent staff. Therefore, in order to implement the program, project management and engineering services must be supplemented by consultant engineers. Amendment No July 14, 2015 Page 2 Fiscal Impact 1 to PSA with Civil Source Project management costs are budgeted into projects included in the adopted Capital Improvement Plan budget. Prepared by: Mia Beltran Management Analyst Approved by: Jim Smith Interim Director of Public Works Approved by: Jason Simpson Director of Administrative Services Approved by: Grant M. Yates City Manager Attachments: Attachment A — Amendment No. 1 to Civil Source PSA ATTACHMENT A AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Civil Source, Inc. Project Management and Engineering Services This Amendment No. 1 to Agreement for Professional Services ("Amendment No. 1") is made and entered into as of July 14, 2015 by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City), and Civil Source, Inc., ("Consultant'). RECITALS A. The City and Consultant have entered into that certain Agreement for Professional Services dated as of July 22, 2014 (the "Original Agreement'). Except as otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth for such terms in the Original Agreement. B. The Original Agreement provided for compensation to Consultant in an amount of One Hundred Seventy Eight Thousand dollars ($178,000) for a period of one (1) year, with an option to extend the term on an annual basis for a total of three (3) years. The parties now desire to renew the Original Agreement, as set forth in this Amendment No. 1 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, City and Consultant agree as follows: 1. Section 2, Time of Performance, of the Original Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: The services of Consultant are to commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall continue until June 30, 2016. The City may, at its sole discretion, extend the term of this Agreement on an annual basis not to exceed two (2) additional annual renewal terms by giving written notice thereof to Consultant not less than thirty (30) days before the end of the contract term, such notice to be exercised by the City Manager. 4. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. ATTACHMENT A IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment No. 1 to be executed on the respective dates set forth below. "CITY" CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal corporation Grant Yates, City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A-1 —Original Agreement "CONSULTANT" Civil Source, Inc. Ami Amirani, Principal Civil Source, Inc. Date: ATTACHMENT A EXHIBIT A-1 ORIGINAL AGREEMENT [ATTACHED] EXHIBIT A-1 EXHIBIT A-1 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This Agreement for Professional Services (the "Agreement")is made and entered into as of the 22 day of July , 2014 , by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, a municipal corporation ("City") and Civil Source. Inc. ("Consultant"). RECITALS A. City desires to retain Consultant to perform Project Management and Engineering services in the City and Consultant desires to provide such professional services and related work as set forth in this Agreement. B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to perform the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein. Ie[t7;7�ihr� 1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services described on Exhibit A which is attached her and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Exhibit A, subject to the direction of the City through its staff that it may provide from time to time. 2. Time of Performance. The services of Consultant are to commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall continue [until completed in accordance with the schedule set forth in the Scope of Work (Exhibit A)J or [for a period of one year. . Professional services as described in Exhibit A may be extended at the discretion of the City on an annual basis for a total of three (3) years.] 3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the Schedule of Charges set forth in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant's compensation exceed $178.000 without additional written authorization from the City. Expenses set forth in Exhibit B shall be reimbursed at cost without an inflator or administrative charge; provided however that approved subconsultants listed in Exhibit D may be billed at cost plus 10%. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment. 4. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly billings to City describing the work performed during the preceding month. Consultant's bills shall be segregated by project task, if applicable, such that the City receives a separate accounting for work done on each individual task for which Consultant provides services. Consultant's bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff. When payments made by City equal 90% of the maximum fee provided for in this Agreement, no further payments shall be made until the final work under this Agreement has been accepted by City. Professional Services Agrecmcnt 1 12/10/13 EXHIBIT A-1 5. Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from City. Extra work will be invoiced separately from services performed in accordance with the Scope of Services. 6. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by the City immediately for cause or by either party without cause upon thirty (30) days' written notice of termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the effective date of termination. 7. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notepad internal documents, shall become the property of the City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. City acknowledges that any use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein shall be at the sole risk of the City. City further - agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the City's use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein. a. Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a nonexclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require that all subcontractors agree in writing that City is granted a nonexclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. Professional Services Agreement 2 12/10/13 F_XHIBIT A-1 b. Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs relating to project for which Consultant's services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant's services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City. 8. Consultant's Books and Records a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant to this Agreement. b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. G. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant's business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant's representatives, or Consultant's successor - in -interest. 9. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of the City. Consultant Professional Services Agreement 3 12/10/13 EXHIBIT A -I shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City's employees, and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights. 10. Interests of Consultant. Consultant (including principals, associates and professional employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant's services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement. Consultant is nota designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant: a. will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of the City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and b . possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2).) _ J 11. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of expertise. 12. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations. 13. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has the licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Lake Elsinore business license. 14. Indemnity. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the Professi0nal Services Agi ccnnmt 4 12110M EXHIBIT A-1 performance of this Agreement or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such claim arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers. 15. Insurance Requirements. a. Insurance. Consultant, at Consultant's own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies. I. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or non -renewal of all Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for City. In the event that Consultant is exempt from Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California, Consultant shall complete and submit to the City a Certificate of Exemption from Workers Compensation Insurance in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C. ii. General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non - owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. iv. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant's operations under this Agreement, whether such operations by the Consultant or by its employees, subcontractors, or sub consultants. The amount of this insurance �- shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims -made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single limit per occurrence basis. Professional SCINices Agrecnienf 5 12110/13 EXHIBIT A-1 b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a Best's rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language: i. The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insured with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it. iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. iv. The Insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents. V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. The insurance provided by this Policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the City. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured. retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Consultant shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self- insured retentions. d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the City at all times during the term of this Agreement. 16. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this (� section. Professional Services Agreemcnl 6 12/10/13 EXHIBIT A-1 If to City: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: Vince Damasse 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore. CA 92530 If to Consultant: Civil Source, Inc. Attn: Ms. Amy Amirani 9890 Irvine Center Drive Irvine, CA 92618 17, Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between the City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement. 18. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney. 19. Assiqnment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant and the subcontractors listed in Exhibit D. Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of any subcontractors. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement except as provided in Exhibit D without the written authorization of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of those subcontractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and any subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law, 20. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement. 21. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 22. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Riverside. i 23. Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the Professional Services Agreement 7 32/10/13 EXHIBIT A-1 prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. 24. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and share the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS/ENDISPUTE ("JAMS") or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation. 25. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. 26. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party. 27. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 28. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City's Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above. I Professional Services Agreement 8 121I0/13 EXHIBIT A-1 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE: By: Printed me: Grant Yates Title: ity Manager CONSULTANT: By: CCinu—G�2i/lo"- Printed NAe: Amy i';wiirant Title: Princio2l Business License # 021582 Attachments: Exhibit A - Scope of Services Exhibit B - Fee Schedule Exhibit C - Certificate of Exemption From Workers' Compensation Insurance —N/A Exhibit D — List of Subcontractors Professional Services Agrcemcnt 12/10/13 EXHIBIT A-1 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES EXHIBIT A-1 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services shall include but not be limited to as -needed planning, design, plan checking, bidding, construction administration, construction management, grant administration, project/program management of the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Developer projects or special projects as directed by the City. Consultant shall serve as extension of City staff. Representative projects include infrastructure improvements for streets, sidewalks, medians, storm drain facilities, traffic signals and other transportation improvements. Services outlined below are representative and not all inclusive and subject to change based on the City's on- going needs. Planning / Design 1. Review and development of engineering studies and master plans including EIR documentation, drainage studies/master plans, traffic surveys/studies, pavement management plan, and other planning documents. Preparation of conceptual plans and budgetary estimates including detailed Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimates (PS&Es). 2. Coordination and management of outside vendors and consultants who provide various ancillary project support services such as design, surveying, soils/geotechnical, materials testing, traffic, and other contract services. 3. Preparation and monitoring of project schedules using Microsoft Project or other similar scheduling software. Monitoring project budgets via the City's financial accounting reporting system to ensure projects are completed on time and budget. 1. Prepare Contract bidding documents including general provisions, special provisions, and technical specifications for construction bidding. Tabulate and evaluate bids. Prepare bid evaluation memo and corresponding staff report. 2. Prepare Requests for Proposals (RFPs) and Statement of Qualifications (SOQs) for miscellaneous City services. 3. Attend pre-bid meetings on behalf of the City. Prepare responses to Requests for Information (RFls) and Requests for Clarification (RFCs) and prepare addendums as necessary. Construction Administration / Inspection 1. Prepare and administer construction contracts. Provide periodic as -needed inspection of construction projects. Provide oversight of inspection efforts working closely with the Attachment A — Page 9 EXHIBIT A -I City's inspectors and/or outside consultants to ensure construction delivery and methods is in accordance with the City's standards and expectations. 2. Attend pre -construction and/or regular construction update meetings. Prepare agenda and minutes. 3. Prepare addenda, respond to RFIs and RFCs during construction. Resolve engineering design related issues as it relates to construction. 4. Develop and/or monitor the construction schedule and budget to minimize change orders and ensure on-time and budget delivery of projects. 5. Assist with the implementation and administration of permits as needed. 6. Resolve field conflicts to minimize change orders and construction delays. T Prepare and verify Contractor progress payments. 8. Prepare staff reports and periodic construction updates. 9. Prepare/coordinate closeout documents including punch lists, as-builts, and other supporting documentation. Grant Administration 1. Aid the City in procuring and/or administering grant funded projects funded by Measure "A", STPL, Safe Routes to School (SRTS), Traffic Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF), and other funding sources. 2. Aid in monitoring grant funding agreements and ensuring project documentation is in compliance with grant requirements. 3. Prepare grant reporting and reimbursement requests with the aid of staff in a timely manner. 4. Work closely with Finance Department to ensure project documentation meets auditing requirements. Staff Augmentation 1. Services may include counter help, processing of permits, and document control. 2. Other duties as assigned by the City or their representative (i.e. Director of Public Works and/or Principal Engineer). Attachment A — Page 10 EXHIBIT A-1 May 15, 2014 Vince Damasse, P.E, Director of Public Works City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 RE: Letter of Proposal — Project Management Consulting Services Dear Mr, Damasse: CivilSource, Inc. (CivilSource) is pleased to submit this proposal to provide a Project Manager for the City of Lake Elsinore (City). FIRM PROFILE In general, CivilSource has been providing highly qualified and experienced professionals on staff augmentation contracts for several years. Public agencies have contracted with CivilSource when it is not cost-effective to fill a full-time position; to relieve peak workload situations; and to fill vacant positions on an interim basis. We select, train, and retain highly qualified employees to supplement contracting cities staffing requirements. Our professional staff has expertise in a wide range of disciplines and extensive experience in many areas, including project management, construction management, and design engineering. CivilSource is committed to providing superior, high-level services to our clients. We do so by maintaining a core of highly qualified staff possessing a wide range of skills that we match with our client's needs. Our professionals are committed to reliable performance, positive attitudes, and a mission focus that is essential to successful outcomes. KEY PERSONNEL We propose Mr. Deepak Solanki, EIT as Project Manager. Deepak has 27 years of professional civil engineering experience in the design and construction of capital improvements, including 10 years with the City of Moreno Valley. His experience includes working with local government, contract management and administration, and planning, designing and managing capital improvement projects in accordance with local, state and federal standards including the Standard Specifications for Public Works (Greenbook). His technical knowledge provides him the exceptional ability to assist the City in resolving any given problem, regardless of size or complexity. The City can rest assured that he is qualified to perform the services necessary for the successful completion of all assigned tasks. In addition and on an as needed basis, we also propose Mr. Jeff Martinez for Quality Control Observation services. Jeff has 14 years of experience in construction oversight of public works improvements. His project experience includes street improvements, storm drains, sewer, water, traffic signals, curb and gutter, landscaping, loop detectors and related construction. Additionally, he possesses the communication skills required to respond to inquiries of the residents and general public. 9890 Irvine Center Drive, Irvine, CA 92618 1 P: 949-585-0477 1 F: 949 585-0433 1 www.civil-source.com EXHIBIT A-1 Letter of Proposal, Page 2 SCOPE OF WORK Our scope of work includes but is not limited to: Planning.[ Desi 1. Review and development of engineering studies and master plans including FIR documentation, drainage studies/master plans, traffic surveys/studies, pavement management plan, and other planning documents. Preparation of conceptual plans and budgetary estimates including detailed Plans, Specifications, and Engineer's Estimates (PS&Es). 2. Coordination and management of outside vendors and consultants who provide various ancillary project support services such as design, surveying, soils/geotechnical, materials testing, traffic, and other contract services. 3. Preparation and monitoring of project schedules using Microsoft Project or other similar scheduling software. Monitoring project budgets via the City's financial accounting reporting system to ensure projects are completed on time and budget. b.idd_ r 9 1. Prepare Contract bidding documents including general provisions, special provisions, and technical specifications for construction bidding. Tabulate and evaluate bids. Prepare bid evaluation memo and corresponding staff report. 2. Prepare Requests for Proposals (RFPs) and Statement of Qualifications (SOQs) for miscellaneous City services. 3. Attend pre-bid meetings on behalf of the City. Prepare responses to Requests for Information (RFIs) and Requests for Clarification (RFCs) and prepare addendums as necessary. Construction Administration / Inspection 1. Prepare and administer construction contracts. Provide periodic as -needed inspection of construction projects. Provide oversight of inspection efforts working closely with the City's inspectors and/or outside consultants to ensure construction delivery and methods is in accordance with the City's standards and expectations. 2. Attend pre -construction and/or regular construction update meetings. Prepare agenda and minutes. 3. Prepare addenda, respond to RFis and RFCs during construction. Resolve engineering design related issues as it relates to construction. 4. Develop and/or monitor the construction schedule and budget to minimize change orders and ensure on-time and budget delivery of projects. 5. Assist with the implementation and administration of permits as needed. 6. Resolve field conflicts to minimize change orders and construction delays. 7. Prepare and verify Contractor progress payments. 8. Prepare staff reports and periodic construction updates. 9. Prepare/coordinate closeout documents including punch lists, as-builts, and other supporting documentation. Grant Administration 1. Aid the City in procuring and/or administering grant funded projects funded by Measure "A", STEL, Safe Routes to School (SRTS), Traffic Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF), and other funding sources. 2. Aid in monitoring grant funding agreements and ensuring project documentation is in compliance with grant requirements. 9890 hvine Center Dive, Irvine, CA 92618 1 P: 949-585-0477 1 F: 949-585-0433 1 www.civil-source.com EXHIBIT A-1 Letter o/ Proposer(, Poge 3 Prepare grant reporting and reimbursement requests with the aid of staff in a timely manner. Work closely with Finance Department to ensure project documentation meets auditing requirements. Staff Auornentation 1. Services may include counter help, processing of permits, and document control. 2. Other duties as assigned by the City or their representative (i.e. Director of Public Works and/or Principal Engineer). FEE PROPOSAL We propose to provide staff augmentation for the Project Manager at $85/hour. We propose to provide staff augmentation for the Quality Control Observer at $75/hour. On behalf of the CivilSource, Inc. team, we thank you for the opportunity to serve as an extension of the Lake Elsinore City staff. We look forward to further discussions with your City on the services provided and assisting you in achieving your goals. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (949) 585-0477 or by email at amy@civil•source.com. Respectfully submitted, CMI -SOURCE, INC. Amy Amirani, P.E. Principal 9890 Irvine Center Drive, Irvine, CA 92618 1 P: 949-585-0477 1 F: 949-585-0433 1 www.civil-source.com EXHIBI r A-1 Deepak Solanki, EIT Project Manaqer Education B.S., Civil Engineering Registration Engineer -in -Training (tentative RE. 2014) Years of Experience 27 Project Manager Deepak Solanki, P.E., has 27 years of civil engineering experience, including 10 years with the City of Moreno Valley, Capital Projects Division. He has extensive experience in the design of diversified civil engineering projects such as street, sewer, water, grading, flood control projects, backbone utility layout and utility relocation. Mr. Solanki has successfully prepared design plans for single family residential subdivisions, commercial, industrial, educational facilities, and Air Force/Naval Base facilities. He has worked on right of way acquisition research and acquisition process, preparing temporary construction easement documents, legal descriptions/plats, surveying, plan check final map for various public agencies, cost estimates and quantity take- offs. Mr. Solanki possesses extensive knowledge in computer and design programs including Microsoft Projects, AutoCAD 2013, 3D Civil and Land Development Design Desktop, GIS Software — Arc View by SSRI, Haestad Methods for Hydraulic Calculations, and Felix software for the design of fire lines. East 19th Street Design Improvements, City of Costa Mesa — Project Manager for this federally funded SRTS traffic calming project. Scope of services consists of preparation and processing of environmental documents (Preliminary Environmental Studies), civil engineering design plans to include the use of chokers and median improvements, and obtaining federal approval for construction and construction support. The project also includes the design of three (3) monument signs. Quartz Hill Drainage Master Plan; Palmdale, CA (Los Angeles County) — Project Manager for the preparation of Storm Drainage Master Plans for the Sphere of Influence (approximately 30 square miles), Project included reconnaissance, hydrology, hydraulics, cost estimating, impact fee analysis and environmental review support. Aqua Dulce backbone Storm Drain Facility; Aqua Dulce, CA (Los Angeles County) -- Project Manager for preparation of about approximately 6,500 feet of 48" Strom Drain backbone drainage facility to provide relief to exist 36" storm drain. Trabuco Canyon Drainage Study, Rancho Margarita, County of Orange — Project Manager for preparation of a storm drainage analysis and design storm drain system for new Cell Tower for Nextel Corporation. Stevenson Ranch, Santa Clarita (Los Angeles County) — Project Manager responsible for preparation of infrastructure plans including street improvements such as the addition of medians, curb and gutter, right and left turn lanes; right-of-way engineering; storm drains; sewer and water; and grading for this single family tract home. Accelerated Road Construction Program, County of Los Angeles — Project Manager for street rehabilitation projects adjacent to the Cities of Azusa, Covina, Glendora, Irwindale, and West Covina, referred to as the Accelerated Road Construction Program for the County of Los Angeles. Prepared Materials Report with recommendations for alternate methods of pavement rehabilitation of this 13,600 foot recently constructed project using asphalt rubber hot mix. EXHIBIT A-1 Deepak Solanki Page 2 Master Drainage and Sewer System for Stevenson Ranch Subdivision, City of Santa Clarita (Los Angeles County); Lennar Homes — Project Manager for preparing about 3,700 feet of storm drains and 4,200 feet of sewer plans for the subdivision. Design of stony) drain included hydrology, hydraulics, storm drainage infrastructure planning, and preparing plan and profile drawings, inlet / outlet structures and catch basins. Sewer plans involved preparing sewer area study calculations, preparing plan and profile drawings of the sewer mains and the lateral connections to each individual home. Torreno de Flores mixed used Housing Complex; City of Los Gatos (Santa Clara Valley Water District); JR Developer's — Project Manager for Site development plans for Storm drain and drainage plan, sewer, water and grading plan. The site was roughly about 20 acres. Atwood Street Improvements, City of Moreno Valley — Project Manager. Prepared street improvement plans, specifications and construction cost estimates. Work included removal and replacement of pavement sections, asphalt concrete overlay, repair of existing curb, gutter and sidewalk, landscape and hardscape improvements, installation of traffic signing and pavement markings, and adjustment of rnanholes/valves. Princess Lane Rehabilitation, City of Moreno Valley — Project Manager. Prepared street improvement plans, specifications and construction cost estimates. Work included removal and replacement of pavement sections, asphalt concrete overlay, repair of existing curb, gutter and sidewalk, landscape and hardscape improvements, installation of traffic signing and pavement markings, and adjustment of manholes/valves. Campbell Avenue Rehabilitation, City of Moreno Valley — Project Manager. Prepared street improvement plans, specifications and construction cost estimates. Work included removal and replacement of pavement sections, asphalt concrete overlay, repair of existing curb, gutter and sidewalk, landscape and hardscape improvements, installation of traffic signing and pavement markings, and adjustment of manholes/valves. Steven Street Improvements, City of Moreno Valley — Project Manager. Prepared street improvement plans, specifications and construction cost estimates. Work included removal and replacement of pavement sections, asphalt concrete overlay, repair of existing curb, gutter and sidewalk, landscape and hardscape improvements, installation of traffic signing and pavement markings, and adjustment of manholes/valves. Indian Street and Cottonwood Avenue, City of Moreno Valley — Project Manager. Prepared Class 1I and Class III bikeway and street widening plans, specifications and estimates. The improvements consisted of removal and replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, and driveways; relocation of traffic signals, power poles, light poles, fire hydrants, and utility boxes; and asphalt paving, traffic striping, and other appurtenant site improvements. Zone D Street Rehabilitation, City of San Dimas — Project Manager. Prepared plans, specification and estimates of asphalt pavement restoration and overlay of various streets within the City's Maintenance Zone "D" for the City of San Dimas. EXHIBIT A-1 Jeff Martinez / Control Observer Education/Certifications Nuclear Density Gauge ACI Certified American Safety Certified High/low Voltage with Arc Flash Awareness Certificate Basic Helicopter Training - TRTP Basic Fire Prevention - TRTP Environmental Training - TRTP Years of Experience 14 Mr. Martinez has 14 years of experience in the quality control of capital improvement projects.. His projects have included water and wastewater (pipelines, wells, etc.), roadways (grading, overlay, etc.), parkway improvements, wet and dry utilities, landscaping and irrigation, and vertical construction. He has extensive experience dealing with the public, elected officials, contractors, architects, and engineers. He has been responsible for monitoring construction activities, traffic control, preparing daily construction inspection reports, verifying compliance with plans and specifications, maintaining record drawings, final inspections, and assisting in field start-ups. Greenspot Road Improvements, East Valley Water District — Monitoring street, sewer and water improvements. Duties included inspection of the construction activities, general safety, preparation of daily reports, photo documentation, and assistance with the progress payment review. Camp Wrightwood Water Main and Tank Site Access Road, Golden State Water Company — Quality Control for the installation of approximately 1700 LF of 12" PVC pipe and road improvements. Duties included inspection of the construction activities, general safety, preparation of daily reports, photo documentation, and assistance with the progress payment review. Waterline Replacement in Jurupa Road between Van Buren Boulevard and Agate Street, Jurupa Community Services District — Construction Inspector for the installation of 3,470 L.F. of 18 -inch diameter CML/CMC WSP water main and appurtenances. Construction cost $1M Waterline Replacement Valley Way, Jurupa Community Services District — Construction Inspector for the installation of 1,928 linear feet of 16 -inch diameter CML/CMC WSP and appurtenances. Bellgrave Avenue Waterline Improvements, Jurupa Community Services District — Construction Inspector for Waterline improvements in Bellegrave Avenue from Etiwanda Avenue to Van Buren Boulevard. The projects consisted of installing 6,584 L.F. of 42 -inch diameter CML/CMC WSP and appurtenances. Cantu-Galleano Waterline Facilities, Jurupa Community Services District — Construction Inspector for the Master Plan 16 -inch Waterline Facilities in Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road from Milliken Avenue to Wineville Road. The project consisted of approximately 473 m of 40.64 cm (16 -inch) diameter CML/CMC. Construction Cost $300,000. Agate Street Pressure Reducing Station Relocation, Jurupa Community Services District — Construction Inspector for Waterline Replacement in Jurupa Road Between Van Buren Boulevard and Agate Street. The projects consisted of relocating an existing pressure reducing station at Agate Street and replacement of existing waterline in Agate Street and Jurupa Road. EXIIIBI'r A-1 Jeff Martinez Page 2 870 Zone Pipeline and Storm Drain Improvements, Jurupa Community Services District — Construction Inspector for the construction of 1400 Lf. of CML/CMC WSP and 500 Lf. of 12 inch to 30 -inch RCP. Responsible for site observation and construction quality, compliance with contract documents, general site safety, preparation of daily reports, photo documentation, review of change orders, maintaining record documents, progress reports, cost reports and cost -control management. Well No. 25, Jurupa Community Services District — Construction Inspector for the installation and construction of District Water Well No. 25 including site/civil/mechanical and electrical work, and testing of system as a whole. Improvements consisted of demolishing and constructing a new muffler room; replacing existing walls; constructing a new concrete roof on the existing pump room; paving and grading the well site; rehabilitating or rearranging various above ground and underground piping and conduits; and installing various new equipment, including and not limited to engine control panels, instrumentation equipment, chemical equipment, and associated equipment. Well No. 22, Jurupa Community Services District — Construction Inspector for the installation and construction of District Water Well No. 25 including site/civil/mechanical and electrical work, and testing of system as a whole. Improvements consisted of demolishing and constructing a new muffler room; replacing existing walls; constructing a new concrete roof on the existing pump room; paving and grading the well site; rehabilitating or rearranging various above ground and underground piping and conduits; and installing various new equipment, including and not limited to engine control panels, instrumentation equipment, chemical equipment, and associated equipment. Well No. 23, Jurupa Community Services District — Construction Inspector for the installation and construction of District Water Well No. 25 including site/civil/mechanical and electrical work, and testing of system as a whole. Improvements consisted of demolishing and constructing a new muffler room; replacing existing walls; constructing a new concrete roof on the existing pump room; paving and grading the well site; rehabilitating or rearranging various above ground and underground piping and conduits; and installing various new equipment, including and not limited to engine control panels, instrumentation equipment, chemical equipment, and associated equipment. Eastvale Interceptor Phases 1 and 2, Jurupa Community Services District — Construction Inspector for the installation of 42 -inch RCP sewer line. Responsible for site observation and construction quality, compliance with contract documents, general site safety, preparation of daily reports, photo documentation, review of change orders, maintaining record documents, progress reports, cost reports and cost -control management. Eastvale Interceptor Phase 3, Jurupa Community Services District — Construction Inspector for the installation of 12 -inch RCP sewer line. Eastvale Interceptor Phase 4, Jurupa Community Services District — Construction Inspector for the connection of 36 -inch sewer line to existing facilities. Eastvale Interceptor Phase 5, Jurupa Community Services District — The project consisted of approximately 5,300 U. of 42 -inch diameter RCP (PVC lined) and appioximately 3,400 L.Y. of 42 -inch diameter RCP (PVC lined) or VCP sewer main and appurtenances. Estimated $SM Jurupa Road Sewer Improvement Phase I and Phase II, Jurupa Community Services District — Construction Inspector for the installation of 4,630 L.F. of 21 -inch diameter VCP sewer main and manholes. Construction cost $1.2M 9890 Wine center Drive 1,vine, CA 82618 Tel. 949.585.0477 Fax'. 949585.0433 w Avxivil .,,rce.com Profile: rxfffI3IT A -I Deepak Solanki Project Engineer Mr. Solanki has 27 years of civil engineering experience, including 10 years with the City of Moreno Valley, Capital Projects Division. He has extensive experience in the design of diversified civil engineering projects such as street, sewer, water, grading, flood control projects, backbone utility layout and utility relocation. Mr. Solanki has successfully prepared design plans for single family residential subdivisions, commercial, industrial, educational facilities, and Air Force/Naval Base facilities. lie has worked on right of way acquisition research and acquisition process, preparing temporary construction easement documents, legal descriptions/plats, surveying, plan check final map for various public agencies, cost estimates and quantity take -offs. Mr. Solanki possesses extensive knowledge in computer and design programs including Microsoft Projects, AutoCAD 2013, 3D Civil and Land Development Design Desktop, GIS Software— Arc View by ESRI, Haestad Methods for Hydraulic Calculations, and Felix software for the design of fire lines. • M.S. University, Faculty of Technology & Engineering • Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, 1982 • Engineering -in -Training, California • P.F. Exam in Fall 2013 Professional Experience: City of Moreno Valley, Project Engineer Assist City right of way agent with boundary research and determine property rights. Prepare land acquisition legal descriptions and plats for various Capital Improvement Projects. Prepare and review temporary construction easement documents. Manage construction of road widening, sidewalks, street medians and improvement of private streets. Design, draft and write technical specification for public/private street improvements and Class II/Class III bikeway plans for Capital Improvement projects. Prepare estimate for construction projects. Work as an on-site inspector for Public Works Project's and prepare street overlay plans and specifications. Develop ranking criteria to rank and prioritize improvements for private streets and infill sections of public streets. Ranking order included design, construction and right of -way acquisition costs. Prepare and submit Federal and State grant applications, such as TUMF, STP, BTA, SB821, TEA and SR2S. Perform engineering plan review and plan checks for Land Development Division and Capital Projects Division. Review and analyze variety of engineering reports and technical documentation, including water quality management plans, land title surveys, conceptual designs and hydrology, hydraulics, geotechnical and soils reports. Prepare and update Public Works City Standard Plans. Perform construction site field inspections, monitor project progress, resolve field issues and ensure compliance with approved plans, specifications and standards. Prepare cost estimates for backbone infrastructures. Costs were incorporated into City's Development Impact Fee Study. Assist in preparing Capital Improvement Plan budget. Prepare Arterial Street Choke Points Program. This program assists in identifying streets with traffic flow issues. Caltrans District 8, Project Engineer Coordinate and expedite documents for allocation of the state and federal funds through California Transportation Commission. Coordinate approval of the right of way certificates and NEPA documents. EXHIBIT A-1 Deepok Solanki, Page 2 Expedite the Request for Authorization (RFA), award package, progress invoice, project closure package, and final invoice reviews. Coordinate with Local Assistance Engineers, SANBAG Project Managers, and Headquarters' Staff to address various comments. Update Local Assistance's database for SANBAG Projects. Review and update Caltrans commitment schedule to SANBAG. Attend progress meetings with Caltrans and SANBAG's representatives. Projects that got obligated and E-76 approved were I-10 / Cherry Avenue Interchange (Fontana), Palm Avenue Grade Separation (San Bernardino), Hunts Lane Grade Separation (Colton), I-10 / Citrus Avenue Interchange (Fontana), I-210 Landscape — Segment 9 (Rialto), I.15 / I-215 Devore Interchange, and Ranchero Rd Realigning, Widening, RR Undercrossing (Hesperia). Project Experience: East 19th Street Design Improvements, City of Costa Mesa - Prepare plans, specifications and estimates for this federally funded SRTS traffic calming project. Scope of services consists of preparation and processing of environmental documents (Preliminary Environmental Studies), civil engineering design plans to include the use of chokers and median improvements, and obtaining federal approval for construction and construction support. The project also includes the design of three (3) monument signs. Zone D Street Rehabilitation, City of San Dimas - Prepared plans, specification and estimates of asphalt pavement restoration and overlay of various streets within the City's Maintenance Zone "D" for the City of San Dimas, Accelerated Road Construction Program, County of Los Angeles - Plan preparation for street rehabilitation projects adjacent to the Cities of Azusa, Covina, Glendora, Irwindale, and West Covina, referred to as the Accelerated Road Construction Program for the County of Los Angeles. Prepared Materials Report with recommendations for alternate methods of pavement rehabilitation of this 13,600 foot recently constructed project using asphalt rubber hot mix. Canyon Road Widening, City of San Dimas - Street widening for San Dimas Canyon Road in the City of San Dimas. Project includes design of road widening and modifying ramps to comply with ADA requirements. McBean Parkway Widening in Valencia, Los Angeles County - Design Engineer for street widening plans, technical specifications and construction costs estimates preparation. The improvements consisted of removal and replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, and driveways; relocation of traffic signals, light poles, fire hydrants, and utility boxes; and asphalt paving, traffic striping, and other appurtenant site improvements. Stevenson Ranch, Santa Clarita (Los Angeles County) - Design Engineer responsible for preparation of infrastructure plans including street improvements such as the addition of medians, curb and gutter, right and left turn lanes; right-of-way engineering; storm drains; sewer and water; and grading for this single family tract home. Atwood Street Improvements, City of Moreno Valley - Prepared street improvement plans, specifications and construction cost estimates. Work included removal and replacement of pavement sections, asphalt concrete overlay, repair of existing curb, gutter and sidewalk, landscape and hardscape improvements, installation of traffic signing and pavement markings, and adjustment of manholes/valves. Princess Lane Rehabilitation, City of Moreno Valley - Prepared street improvement plans, specifications and construction cost estimates. Work included removal and replacement of pavement sections, asphalt concrete EXHIBITA-1 Deepak Solanki, Paye 3 overlay, repair of existing curb, gutter and sidewalk, landscape and hardscape improvements, installation of traffic signing and pavement markings, and adjustment of manholes/valves. Campbell Avenue Rehabilitation, City of Moreno Valley -- Prepared street improvement plans, specifications and construction cost estimates. Work included removal and replacement of pavement sections, asphalt concrete overlay, repair of existing curb, gutter and sidewalk, landscape and hardscape improvements, Installation of traffic signing and pavement markings, and adjustment of manholes/valves. Quartz Hill Drainage Master Plan; Palmdale, CA (Los Angeles County) - Project Engineer for the preparation of Storm Drainage Master Plans for the Sphere of Influence (approximately 30 square miles). Project included reconnaissance, hydrology, hydraulics, cost estimating, impact fee analysis and environmental review support. Steven Street Improvements, City of Moreno Valley - Prepared street improvement plans, specifications and construction cost estimates. Work included removal and replacement of pavement sections, asphalt concrete overlay, repair of existing curb, gutter and sidewalk, landscape and hardscape improvements, installation of traffic signing and pavement markings, and adjustment of manholes/valves. Aqua Dulce backbone Storm Drain Facility; Aqua Dulce, CA (Los Angeles County) - Project Manager for preparation of about approximately 6,500 feet of 48" Strom Drain backbone drainage facility to provide relief to exist 36" storm drain. Trabuco Canyon Drainage Study, Rancho Margarita, County of Orange - Project Engineer for preparation of a storm drainage analysis and design storm drain system for new Cell Tower for Nextel Corporation. Indian Street and Cottonwood Avenue, City of Moreno Valley -- Design Engineer. Prepared Class I1 and Class III bikeway and street widening plans, specifications and estimates. The improvements consisted of removal and replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, and driveways; relocation of traffic signals, power poles, light poles, fire hydrants, and utility boxes; and asphalt paving, traffic striping, and other appurtenant site improvements. EXHIBIT A-1 SCHEDULE OF CHARGES Attachment A — Page 11 EXHIBIT A-1 RATE SCHEDULE Range of Hourly Rates: All Employees in company/field office or in Client offices. Effective: For the duration of contract. Principal/Project Director $160 Principal Engineer $150 Senior Project Manager, Area/Senior Construction Marra er $120-$140 Project Manager $85-$140 Construction Manager/Resident Engineer $110-$120 Certified Construction Manager $110-$120 Project Engineer $100-$110 Scheduling/Cost Engineer $105 Senior Planner/Permit Specialist $85 CADD Operator/Drafter $85 D5 Certified Engineer/Quality Control $125 Quality Control Observer $75-$98 LEED Certified Observer $75-$98 Labor Compliance/Federal Funding Specialist $75 Contract Administrator $69 Technical Support $69 Administration $69 Reproduction Cost Consultant Services Cost + 15% Automobile Transportation $.565 per mile Delivery, Freight, Courier Cost Agency Fees Cost Commercial Travel Cost CivilSource, Inc. • 9890 Irvine Center Drive, Irvine CA 92618 • Tel: 949-585-0477 • Fax: 949-585-0433 • www.civil-scurce.com City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w Jake-elsinore.org Text File File Number: ID# 15-665 Agenda Date: 7/14/2015 Version: 1 Status: Approval Final In Control: City Council File Type: Report Agenda Number: 4) City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 7/9/2015 i �ttit. ( F tillt..:lii� Agenda Date: 7/14/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 3) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 15-664 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 www.lake-elsinore. org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 719/2015 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 Mayor Manos stated that he attended the Menifee State of the City and that it is exciting and encouraging to see the progress that City has made. He also attended a meeting held by Studio 395 and stated they are very active in this community and are discussing creating a theater program. He attended the public outreach meeting for the 1-15 Railroad Canyon Road and Franklin Interchange Project and stated that the public in attendance were satisfied with the responses they received. The next public outreach meeting will be held on Monday, July 13th at 6:30 p.m. at the Cultural Center. Mayor Manos addressed comments regarding the service change at Fire Station #10 and stated the change was not a decision that was made lightly and the Council has shown its commitment to provide fire safety. He explained the EIR from Castle and Cooke is a report about how the project affects the City and surrounding communities, the report is being prepared and not available to be released. Mayor Manos stated the City is spending in a deficit this year, because there is an economic opportunity for the City to invest in its future. Council had to make difficult choices with the budget, so that the City could invest in itself. He wished everyone a Happy 4th of July and to be safe. Mayor Manos stated that the meeting would be adjourned in memory of Tom Thomas who was a very joyful and giving person and dedicated to this community. Council Member Johnson announced on June 18th Tom Thomas lost his battle to cancer. Mr. Thomas served on the Lake Elsinore Unified School District Board of Trustees, was the Executive Director of Cops for Kids, past President of the Lake Elsinore Rotary Club, Member of the Baja California Rotary Club, and the pioneer that established live feed for the council meetings in Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake. Council Member Johnson stated that Mr. Thomas was always willing to help anyone in need and is survived by his wife, Dee and son, Matt. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Manos adjourned the meeting in memory of Tom Thomas at 8:44 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting to be held on Tuesday, July 14, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. Steve Manos, Mayor Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk City o7 Lake Elsinore Page 15 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 Community Services Director Skinner provided an overview of the areas that will be impacted by the various events on the 4th of July. Director Skinner announced the concert at Lakepoint Park, the Storm baseball game at the Diamond Stadium, and the Fireworks Spectacular at the lake. He reviewed the schedules, layouts and traffic plan of the events. The Parks and Recreation staff and Public Works staff will also be on hand to ensure safety. Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale asked Director Skinner regarding the aquatic program that is offered. Director Skinner responded that a swimming program will be offered at Lakeside High School from 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. The children are rated on their swimming levels and are advanced in the swimming program as their swimming skills improve. CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS - None CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Council Member Johnson stated that she had the opportunity to observe a DUI checkpoint and was impressed with the law enforcement team's professionalism and thanked them for keeping the City safe. Council Member Johnson congratulated Sergeant Giannakakos and Deputy Coats on their recognition. She reminded the public to be patient and safe on the 4th of July. Council Member Magee announced that on June 22nd the Budget Committee for the County Transportation Commission voted to allocate $1.3 million in Measure A funds to this community. Those funds come back to the City for its involvement with the TUMF program. He announced that the Arroyo del Toro Channel dedication was held today and that in 2005 there was a flood that caused serious erosion to the cemetery. In 2007, the Cemetery District, Flood Control Commission, State, and County were at odds with one another until Flood Control Commissioner Hyland brought them together to meet and discuss the cemetery matter. After 29 years of an assessment in Zone 3 the first project was completed and thanked Commissioner Hyland for bringing everyone together. Council Member Magee announced the loss Tom Thomas, a true leader in this valley. He said it was a privilege to served and know Tom Thomas and he will be missed. He addressed Mr. Kilroy's statement regarding the contract termination with Cal -Fire and stated that it was incorrect in that it takes a year to terminate a contract with Cal -Fire. Council Member Magee explained the City is negotiating the change in the service level and that process is ongoing. He added that public safety remains a top priority for the Council. Council Member Magee reminded the public that 4th of July is the busiest day of the year for animal control services and to keep their pets safe. He wished everyone a safe and joyous 4th of July weekend. Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale spoke regarding the drownings in the County and stated that the Riverside County Board of Supervisors is taking these drownings seriously. Fire Chief Hawkins, Public Health and Environmental Health are doing their best to prevent drownings. Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale reminded everyone to supervise their children and thanked Fire Cheif Newman for the presentation; he also thanked staff for all their hard work. City of Lake Elsinore Page 14 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 Council Member Magee inquired regarding the lengthy list of policy statements. Mayor Manos responded that the list is a template provided by California League of Cities. Council Member Manos stated that he was impressed with the items on the list and the reoccurring theme of "Support Legislation" and "Funding for Local Government." Council Member Magee stated that he is in support of the item and complemented Mayor Manos. Motion by Council Member Magee, second by Council Member Johnson, to approve and adopt the City of Lake Elsinore 2015 Legislative Platform; and approve and adopt Resolution No. 2015-061 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Adopting City Council Policy No. 400-13 "Legislative Program Policy and Procedures," passed by unanimous vote as follow: AYES Council Member Magee, Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: Council Member Hickman ABSTAIN: None PUBLIC COMMENTS Pat Kilroy, Lake Elsinore resident spoke in opposition of the City's budget cut to terminate the contract with Cal -Fire for Fire Station #10 and explained the negative impacts the City will have as a result of unfunding the fire station. Mr. Kilroy pointed out that this item was not presented to the Public Safety Advisory Commission and requested that the City Council look elsewhere to cut the budget and restore funding to Fire Station #10. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS 16) TMP -938 City Departmental Monthly Reports Attachments: Monthly Reports ** Update on Designated Swimming Areas ** 4th of July Fireworks Management Analyst Dailey provided an update of the swimming ordinance amendments and reviewed the key tasks to allow swimming in designated areas on the lake. She stated the ordinance would become effective on June 25, 2015. The City is currently focusing on Elm Grove swimming area and the second swimming area will be located at La Laguna. Staff anticipates the opening of the swimming areas by the July 4th or the following weekend. Analyst Dailey stated staff is working with the Public Safety Advisory Commission and moving forward with the lake use ordinance amendments. City or Lake Elsinore Page 13 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 Council Member Magee stated the City is in a better financial position than it was 5 years ago, because it has been conservative with its projections and has created a savings account. If the City is going to keep up with the pace of rising public safety costs, and the needs and expectations of the community, it needs to invest significantly in its economic development. He stated that he does not know why the Environment Impact Report is not being released. Council Member Magee stated that he is in support of the proposed agreement. Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale stated that he is in support of his colleagues and is in support of this item. Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, second by Mayor Manos, to authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Development Management Group, Inc. to provide economic development professional services to the City of Lake Elsinore for the period of FY 2015/2016 through FY 2017/2018, passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Mayor Manos, Council Member Johnson, and Council Member Magee NOES None ABSENT: Council Member Hickman ABSTAIN: None 15) ID# 14-654 City of Lake Elsinore 2015 Legislative Platform and Resolution No. 2015-061 Adopting City Council Policy No. 400-13 "Legislative Program Policy and Procedures" Attachments: Staff report Legislative Platform - 3 revised Reso on Legislative Program and Policy revised 3 Legislative Platform Final 2 Council Polic No 400-13 Le islative Platform and Pro ram Polic 2 revised It is recommended that the City Council: A.) Approve and adopt the City of Lake Elsinore 2015 Legislative Platform; and B.) Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2015-061 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Adopting City Council Policy No. 400-13 "Legislative Program Policy and Procedures" Mayor Manos stated that he is the City's representative for the California League of Cities and the Director for the Riverside County's League of Cities Board. He provided an overview of the staff report and recommendations to Council. The City does not currently have a legislative platform, therefore staff has created procedures for a legislative platform that would allow the Mayor to write letters of "Support" or "Opposition" on behalf of the City to its legislative representatives. The legislative platform would also allow for the designation of an Alternative Member and certain legislative items to be reviewed and discussed by Council before a letter is written. Mayor Manos thanked City Attorney Leibold and City Clerk Bloom for their work. City of Lake Elsinore Page 12 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 BUSINESS ITEM(S) 14) ID# 14-653 Professional Services Agreement with Development Management Group, Inc. (DMG Economics) for Provision of Economic Development Services Attachments: Staff Report - 7-14-2015 dmo FINAL DMG INC Professional Services A reement 7-1 2015 DMGCo rporateProfile0615 Authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Development Management Group, Inc. to provide economic development professional services to the City of Lake Elsinore for the period of FY 2015/2016 through FY 2017/2018, City Manager Yates stated the City Council discussed the need for an Economic Development specialist on the City's team during the budget process. He introduced Economic Development Specialist Michael Bracken who has been working on special City projects for over a year. Michael Bracken, Managing Partner of DMG Economics provided a history of the firm's background and services they provide in both the public and private sectors. Mr. Bracken reviewed the proposed three (3) year agreement and stated that it is important for an agreement to be in place so that the City can market to brokers and developers. The agreement will generate an economic strategic plan for the next 5 to 10 years, work with a formalized business recruitment, serve as project ombudsman for larger projects, and provide economic development training to the community, elected and appointed officials, staff and law enforcement. Kim Cousins, President of the Lake Elsinore Valley Chamber of Commerce, stated that Mr. Bracken has opened some amazing opportunities over the past years and looked forward to the development of a strategy to make Lake Elsinore a progressive City. Council Member Johnson thanked Kim Cousins, CEO President of the Chamber of Commerce, for his comments because for a long time the economic development efforts of the City have been primarily from the Chamber of Commerce and the City appreciates that. She stated that it is a great compliment for the chamber of commerce to work in partnership with the City. Mayor Manos stated Mr. Bracken is very intelligent in marketing the City and in communicating with retailers who are considering Lake Elsinore. The City could use that caliber of service. Mayor Manos stated he is in favor of the agreement. City of Lake Elsinore Page 11 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, to adopt Resolution No. 2015-059 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Adopting Findings that Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 2005-01 and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 are Consistent with the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, passed by unanimous vote as follow: AYES Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Magee, and Mayor Manos NOES i None ABSENT: Council Member Hickman ABSTAIN: None Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Council Member Magee, to waive further reading and introduce by title only Ordinance No. 2015-1341 with the addition to Conditon No. 77 of no RV parking and that no parking signs shall be installed along the frontages of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive and the addition to Condition No. 103 of no more than 20 units may be permitted before the traffic signal is energized. City Clerk Bloom read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1341 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE VILLAGES AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN, passed by unanimous roll -call vote as follows: AYES : Council Member Johnson, Council Member Magee, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: Council Member Hickman ABSTAIN: None Motion Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, second by Council Member Johnson, to adopt Resolution No. 2015-060 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Approving Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 Providing Building Designs for 163 Detached Single -Family Condominium Dwelling Units and Related Improvements, as amended, passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Johnson, Council Member Magee, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: Council Member Hickman ABSTAIN: None APPEAL(S) - None City of Lake Elsinore Page 10 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 Nancy Huntzinger, county resident, stated that she is in support of the project however asked how many traffic signal lights will be installed to support this project and expressed her concerns regarding additional traffic. Planning Manager MacHott responded the proposed project is conditioned to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive and required to include a deceleration lane leading into its entrance to slow vehicles down before pulling in. Mayor Manos asked if Caltrans has reviewed the installation of the traffic signal. Manager MacHott responded that Caltrans has reviewed the initial traffic study and has cleared the construction plans for the state highway. Sharon Gallino, resident asked how the swimming pool will be filled during a drought. Community Development Director Taylor responded staff met with EVMWD and discussed swimming pools, a moratorium, and will serve letters for developments. EVMWD has advised that this year there is enough water for all the projects and will not initiate a moratorium on swimming pools. Chris Hyland, Lake Elsinore resident, spoke in favor of the proposed project and her traffic concerns for child safety. There being no further public comments, Mayor Manos closed the Public Hearing at 7:43 p.m. Council Member Magee thanked staff and the developer for bringing forward the improved design with detached units as opposed to attached units and improved architecture. He stated that he has concerns about parking and stressed that the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions need to include a limitation or prohibition on RV parking and storage, since there will not be an onsite storage lot. Council Member Magee stated that he wanted to add, "No Parking" signs on Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive to Condition No. 77. He also added "No more than 20 units may be permitted before the signal is energized" to Conditon No. 103. Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, to adopt Resolution No. 2015-058 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsiore, California, Regarding Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 2005-01 and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 Adopting Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration 2006-05, passed by unanimous vote as follow: AYES Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Magee, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: Council Member Hickman ABSTAIN: None City of Lake Elsinore Page 9 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 Attachments: SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - CC Staff Report 6_23-15 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - Vicinity Map 6-23-15 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07_= The Village at Lakeshore - Aerial Map 6-23-15 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - CC _Resolutions and Ordinances 6-23-15 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 20147-07- The Villageat Lakeshore - Amended Specific Plan 6-23-15 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 -The Village at Lakeshore - AMND 6-23-16 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - PC Staff Report 4-21-15 - 6-23-15 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - PC Staff Report 5-5-15 - 6-23-15 The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following action: A.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-058 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Regarding Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 2005-01 and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 Adopting Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration 2006-05. B.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-059 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Adopting Findings that Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 2005-01 and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 are Consistent with the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. C.) Introduce by title only and waive further reading of ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1341 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE VILLAGES AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN. D.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-060 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Approving Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 Providing Building Designs for 163 Detached Single -Family Condominium Dwelling Units and Related Improvements. Mayor Manos opened the Public Hearing at 7:33 p.m. Planning Manager MacHott provided an overview of the staff report and recommendations to Council. Manager MacHott explained the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan was approved in 2006 with 146 detached single-family units and the proposed project is for 163 single-family condominium residences. He reviewed the recreational amenities and architectural styles. City of Lake Elsinore Page 8 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 Community Services Director Skinner provided an overview of the staff report and recommendations. Director Skinner explained the temporary operations of La Laguna Resort and revisions to the agreement; William's Bait & Tackle, Inc. responsibilities of day to day maintenance and staffing; and the City's responsibilities of the larger maintenance tasks. Pat Kilroy, Lake Elsinore resident, spoke in opposition of the operational agreement between the City and William's Bait & Tackle, Inc. and expressed his concerns regarding the agreement process. Mr. Kilroy also questioned the 14 hours of operation that was stipulated in the agreement and stated that the facility is opened 24 hours. Kim Cousins stated that for the past 18 months the the Lake Elsinore Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors has encouraged the City to take over operations of La Laguna Resort. Mr. Cousins also stated that little has been accomplished to raise the standards at the campground by the previous operator. He spoke in favor of William Johnson as an ambassador for the City and La Laguna Resort. Council Member Magee stated William Johnson is the right person for the campground facility. He stated that he had to wait in line at the gate on both occasions that he visited the campground because people were checking -in. Council Member Magee believes that Mr. Johnson will change the atmosphere with his attitude and entrepreneurial spirit. Motion by Council Member Magee, second by Council Member Johnson, to approve the agreement for operational management of La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch with William's Bait & Tackle, Inc. in the form and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement, subject to any minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney, passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Council Member Magee, Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: Council Member Hickman ABSTAIN: None PUBLIC HEARING(S) 13) ID# 14-652 Specific Plan Amendment No. 2014-02 & Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 - A Request for Approval of Amendments to Previously Approved The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and Approval of Building Designs for 163 Detached Condominiums and Related Improvements City o/ Lake Elsinore Page 7 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. 11) ID# 14-650 Award Construction Contract to L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc. For Whisker's Fishing Beach Improvements - CIP Project No. 4369 Attachments: Staff Report - Whisker's Parking Lotlmgrovement Construction Services A It is recommended that the City Council: A.) Approve and award the Agreement for Public Works Construction to L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc., in the amount of $234,833 for the Whisker's Fishing Beach Improvements Project, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney; and B.) Authorize the City Manager to execute contract change orders not to exceed 15% of the total Agreement, pursuant to requirements set forth in the construction agreement; and C.) Authorize the Director of Public Works to record the Notice of Completion once it is determined the work is complete and the improvements are accepted. City Clerk Bloom announced two speakers on Agenda Item No. 12, therefore pulling this item from the Consent Calendar. Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, to approve the Consent Calendar, less Agenda Item No. 12, passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Magee, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: Council Member Hickman ABSTAIN: None AGENDA ITEMS) PULLED 12) ID# 14-651 Agreement For Operational Management of La Laguna Resort And Boat Launch Between Williams Bait & Tackle, Inc. And City of Lake Elsinore Attachments: Staff Report -- La Laguna Operations Agreement 061715 ATTACHMENT -_La Laquna Operations_Agreement 061715 Final It is recommended that the City Council Approve the Agreement for Operational Management of La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch with Williams Bait & Tackle, Inc. in the form attached and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement, subject to any minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney. City of Lake Elsinore Page 6 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 engineering services and reimbursables related to design development and construction documents for Serenity Park Phase 11 located at 19685 Palomar Road and the adjacent 2.68 acre parcel (APN 370-120-045) and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. 7) ID# 14-646 Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services Attachments: Staff Report Tree Trimming Contractor Services Aamt 2015 It is recommended that the City Council Approve and award the Agreement fur Contractor Services to West Coast Arborist in the amount of $85,000 (plus 10% contingency, for a total budget of $93,500) for Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form attached and in such form as approved by the City Attorney; and Authorize the City Manager to execute amendments not to exceed 10% contingency, as needed for emergency/extra work. 8) ID# 14-647 Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with HR Green California. Inc. Attachments: StaffRe_oort --Amendment No. 2 HR Green Attachment'A' - HR Green - Amendment No 2 to PSA Attachment'8' - Active List of Land Use Applications Staff recommends the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement for Professional Services with HR Green California, Inc., for engineering, project support, and plan check services in the amount of $242,080, in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. 9) ID# 14-648 Amendment No. 3 to Professional Services Agreement With Sustainable Civil Engineering Services Attachments: Staff Report -Extend SCES PSA -Amendment No. 3 Attachment A - Amendment No. 3 to SCES PSA Staff recommends the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 3 to approve the third year of the Agreement for Professional Services with Sustainable Civil Engineering Services, Inc. (SCES), for project management and plan check services, in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. 10) ID# 14-649 Award Agreement for Professional Services for 1-15/Main Street Interchange Design Services Attachments: Staff Report Main Street 1-15 Design Services PSA PSA with Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions Professional Services 2015 It is recommended that the City Council Award Agreement for Professional Services to Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions for the Design of the 1-15/Main Street Interchange Street/Ramp Widening and Traffic Signals; and Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in the amount of $238,668 to Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions, in substantially the form City of Lake Elsinore Page 5 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 2) ID# 14-641 City Investment Report for May 2015 Attachments: City Investment Staff Report 2015-05 City Investment Report 2015-05 Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Investment Report for May 2015. 3) ID# 14-642 Acquisition of Service Body Fleet Vehicle Attachments: Acquisition of Service Body Fleet Vehicle Staff Report Exhibit A - Acquisition of Service Bodv Fleet Vehicle Request for Proposal(RFP).doc Exhibit B- Acquisition of Service Bodv Fleet Vehicle - Service Bed Lake Chevrolet Bid Staff recommends the City Council award the purchase of one (1) service body fleet vehicle to be awarded to Lake Chevrolet in the amount of $40,287.18. 4) ID# 14-643 Approval of Professional Services Contract with Carole Donahoe to Provide Specialized Planning Services for Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Attachments: Consultant Services Contract 2015-2016 - Carole Donahoe - CC Staff Report - 6-23-15 Draft Consultant Services Contract 2014-2015 - Carole Donahoe 6-23-15 It is recommended that the City Council Authorize the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Contract with Carole Donahoe for the provision of specialized planning services to the City of Lake Elsinore during Fiscal Year 2015-2016 in an amount not to exceed $50,000 in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. 5) ID# 14-644 Approve designation of Mayor as City Voting Delegate for the 2015 League of California Cities Annual Conference Attachments: Staff report LOCC Voting Delegate LOCC Annual Conference Voting Delegate It is recommended that the City Council approve the Mayor as the City's Voting Delegate for the 2015 League of California Cities Annual Conference to be held September 30 - October 2, 2015 in San Jose. 6) ID# 14-645 Professional Services Agreement between RHA Landscape Architects Planners and the City of Lake Elsinore (Serenity Park Phase II Attachments: Staff Report - RHA Agenda Report 6-23-2015 ATTACHMENT - RHA Proposal - Serenity Park Improvements ATTACHMENT - RHA Schedule of Proposed Fees Costs ATTACHMENT - RNA Professional Services Agreement Staff recommends the City Council approve a Professional Services Agreement by and between RHA Landscape Architects Planners and the City of Lake Elsinore in the amount not to exceed $79,409 for landscape architecture, City of Lake Elsinore Page 4 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 Mayor Manos presented a Proclamation declaring July as "Parks & Recreation Month" to Community Services Director Skinner and Recreation Supervisor Davis. Director Skinner announced the fireworks show and concert on July 4th, free swim night on July 10th and July 24th from 6:00 p.m to 8:00 p.m.; skate park opening; Summer Nights at Rosetta Park on July 10th and Serenity Park on July 24th; free boating days on July 12th and 26th; and Movies at the Park at Summerlake Park on July 1 st, 15th, and 29th. Mayor Manos announced an additional presentation regarding Drowning Prevention by Cal Fire. Fire Chief Newman provided a presentation on drowning safety and prevention. He stated that statistically the county is up 30% in drownings and near drowning in fresh water. Cheif Newman reviewed the ABC's of Water Safety and the drowning statistics from January 1st through June 15th, 2015. PUBLIC COMMENTS Teresa Kirpluk, Lake Elsinore resident, asked Council to move forward with the Alberhill Villages project and stated that she is tired of traveling to other cities to fulfill her shopping needs. Pat Kilroy, Lake Elsinore resident, spoke in opposition of eliminating Fire Station #10 services and stated that now is not the time to cut fire protection and paramedic services to the City. Victoria Krier, Lake Elsinore resident, spoke in favor of moving forward with the Alberhill Villages project. Sharon Gallino, Lake Elsinore resident, stated that she attended a community meeting on June 10th with neighbors and Castle Cooke and the attendees were informed that the City was holding up the project from further development. The public was also encouraged to go to the City and express their concerns. Ms. Gallino stated that City Council and staff should have been invited to attend that meeting. Paulie Tehrani, Lake Elsinore resident, thanked the Council for doing a great job in cleaning up the City. Ms. Tehrani also thanked Community Development Director Taylor and the Code Enforcement Divisoin for looking after the City. CONSENT CALENDAR 1) ID# 14-640 Approval of Minutes Attachments: CCMinute Report 6-9-2015 CC Minutes It is recommended thatthe City Council approve the Minutes as submitted. City or Lake Elsinore Page 3 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Manos reconvened the meeting at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Manos. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Council Member Johnson, Council Member Magee, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, and Mayor Manos ABSENT: Council Member Hickman Also present: City Manager Yates, City Attorney Leibold, City Clerk Bloom, Administrative Services Director Simpson, Community Development Director Taylor, Interim Public Works Director Smith, Community Services Director Skinner, Planning Manager MacHott, Management Analyst Dailey, Police Chief Hollingsworth, Fire Chief Newman, and Deputy City Clerk Giron CLOSED SESSION REPORT City Attorney Leibold announced that the City Council met in Closed Session to discuss: Public Employee Performance Evaluation of the City Manager pursuant to Government Code Section 54957, subdivision (b), paragraph (2); two (2) potential cases of anticipated litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 of subdivision (d), paragraph (2); and one (1) potential case of anticipated litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9, subdivision (d), paragraph (4). City Attorney Leibold stated that no reportable action was taken. PRESENTATIONS / CEREMONIALS ** Recognition of Sheriff Deputy Carl Coats Mayor Manos presented a Certificate of Recognition to Sheriff Deputy Coats. ** Recognition of Sheriff Sergeant Pete Giannakakos Mayor Manos presented a Certificate of Recognition to Deputy Segeant Giannakakos. ** Recognition Declaring July as "Parks & Recreation Month" City of Lake Elsinore Page 2 L(1KE LLSI1`ORE _� DIU3. x'. FY.'I'IU.�n I. W' Tuesday, June 23, 2015 CALL TO ORDER City of Lake Elsinore Meeting Minutes City Council STEVE MANOS, MAYOR BRIAN TISDALE, MAYOR PRO TEM DARYL HICKMAN, COUNCIL MEMBER ROBERT MAGEE, COUNCIL MEMBER NATASHA JOHNSON, COUNCIL MEMBER GRANT YATES, CITY MANAGER 7:00 PM Mayor Manos called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. ROLL CALL LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE CULTURAL CENTER 183 N. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 PRESENT: Council Member Johnson, Council Member Magee, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale and Mayor Manos ABSENT: Council Member Hickman Also present: City Manager Yates, City Attorney Leibold, and City Clerk Bloom CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Gov't Code § 54957(b)): City Manager CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL --ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Gov't Code Section 54956.9 (2 potential cases) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL --ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Gov't Code Section 54956.9 (1 potential case) Cultural Center City Attorney Leibold announced that the City Council would be meeting in Closed Session to discuss the items identified on the City Council Closed Session. The City Council recessed to Closed Session at 5:01 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None City o/ Lake Elsinore Page l C I'IY C)l LADE L S I N 0Rf DRI AM 1.XIRIMd REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk DATE: July 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the Minutes as submitted. Discussion The following minutes are submitted for approval: a. Regular City Council meeting of June 23, 2015 Prepared by: Diana Giron, Deputy City Clerk Approved and Submitted by: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk Approved by: Grant Yates, City Manager Attachment: Draft Minutes of June 23, 2015 Agenda Date: 7/14/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 2) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 15-663 Version: 1 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w lake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 9 Printed on 7/912015 Cr]Y C) " .OKE LSIN0RZE ` D1l[Ah�h NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, continued the public hearing held on May 12, 2015, to the regular meeting of July 14, 2015, at the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center, 183 North Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California, 92530, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to consider the following related items: T_ERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN (SP NO. 2012-01) AND RELATED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2012-03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2012-05, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36557 AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36577 - APPLICATIONS BY SPECTRUM COMMUNITIES, PROPOSING A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, WITH APPROXIMATELY 76.5 ACRES OF RESIDENTIAL (468 DWELLING UNITS), 22 ACRES OF OPEN SPACE, 22.5 ACRES OF ROADWAYS, 1.6 ACRES OF PARK (2.1 GROSS ACRES), AND 28.2 ACRES OF GRADED SLOPES AND BASINS. THE SOUTHERN PROJECT BOUNDARY IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO LAKESHORE DRIVE, BETWEEN TERRA COTTA ROAD AND DRYDEN STREET. HOFF AVENUE IS LOCATED ALONG THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY. PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA), THE CITY PROPOSES TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROJECT. STAFF HAS FOUND THAT THE PROJECT WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT ON THE BASIS OF THE INITIAL STUDY WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS OF CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15072(G)(5), THE PROJECT SITE IS NOT LISTED AS A HAZARDOUS PROPERTY AS DESIGNATED UNDER SECTION 65962.5 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE. ON MARCH 17, 2015 AT A DULY NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING, THE LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED ADOPTION OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2015-01 AND APPROVAL OF TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN (SP NO. 2012-01), ZONE CHANGE NO. 2012-05, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2012-03, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36577. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are hereby invited to attend this public hearing to present written information, express opinions or otherwise present evidence in the above matters. If you wish to legally challenge any action taken by the City on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City prior to or at the public hearing. FURTHER INFORMATION on this item may be obtained by contacting Richard J. MacHott, Planning Manager, in the Planning Division at (951) 674-3124, ext. 209. All agenda materials are available for review at City Hall and on the City's website at www.Lake- Elsinore.org. Dated: July 1, 2015 Vi g"nia J. oom, City Clerk Posted at City Hall on July 1, 2015 AERIAL MAP TERRACINASPECIFIC PLAN (SP 2012-01) GPA 2012-03, ZC 2012-05, VTM 36557, TTM 36577 CITY 01 I,ALSiI� DRI AM tXlRLM1- Planning commission Meeting Minutes COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS March 17, 2015 Vice Chair Jordan welcomed new Planning Commissioners Lance Ray and Tim Fleming to the Planning Commission. She complimented them on their conversation input and questions tonight. And she looks forward to future on having them on board Commissioner Armit thanked staff for sending Commissioners to Conference, he stated it was very Informative. He welcomed new Commissioners and thanked them for serving on the Planning Commission. Planning Commissioners Lance Ray and Tim Fleming also thanked Staff for sending them to conference as well. Commissioner Fleming also thanked staff for sending him to the Conference. He said he was glad to see some long over due old projects coming forward. Commissioner Ray thanked Staff for giving him the opportunity participate. Chairman Gray concluded with thanking Planning Commission. He stated that it was excellent seeing Agenda's filling up, it indicates what is going on in the City. He explained that the cycle of development growth is coming back and the Commission is very glad to see applicants like Mr. Lunde and these fine projects that are coming into the City. ADJOURNMENT The next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting to be held on Tuesday, April 7, 2015, at the Cultural Center, 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530. John Gray, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore Attest: Richard J. MacHott, LEED Green Associate Planning Manager City of Lake Elsinore Page 16 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 17, 2015 Motion by Chairman Gray, second by Commissioner Fleming to Adopt Resolution 2015-18; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Tentative Tract Map 36567 Located Northeast of Interstate 15 at Main Street Approximately One -Quarter Mile Northeast of Camino Del Norte, Dividing Approximately 67.9 Acres into 147 Single-family Residential Lots, Two Open Lots, Three Open Space Lots for a Park and One Open Space/Water Quality basin lot, and The Grading and Use of an Adjacent City -owned Parcel as Part of the Park. AYES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner Armit, Commissioner Fleming, Commissioner Ray NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None BUSINESS ITEMS} - None STAFF COMMENTS Community Development Director concluded with future projects in the City of Lake Elsinore and stated it is getting busy. He thanked Planning Commission and staff. Planning Manager Richard MacHott Informed Staff of upcoming Annexation into the City that is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning. Attorney Liebold welcomed Commissioners Fleming and Ray and complimented them on their fantastic job tonight. Liebold announced her Partner David Mann, will be the main point person. Mann will be covering Planning Commission and working thru the Planning Commission Agenda's. She welcomed David to Planning Commission. Attorney David Mann stated he looks forward to working with everyone and that he is really excited to have this additional roll at the City. Fie explained he has worked with Community Development Director Taylor and Planning Manager MacHott on special projects for a long time, as well as been Barbara's back-up. He said he was very excited to have the opportunity to be more involved in Planning with the City. City of Lake Elsinore Page 15 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 17, 2015 Planning Manager Richard MacHott summarized his staff report. Applicant Lunde continued with saying, there was a previous map that was being processed in the City on this property for over 400 units. That was going to be smaller lot condos, the market went down and applicant went away. The property does have existing General Plan and Zoning for 400 hundred units and they are roughly 64% less then that. They are incorporating the City property that really is useless property, if they don't include it into the park. Its not part of the landfill area, it was a barrow site, so there is no contaminant associated with that. He also explained, in partnership with the City they did show that one of the alignments for La Strada Ave in case that needed go in at a future date, they accounted for that. He said these are large lots, it has General Plan Designation and Zoning. He assured they followed all the rules and he thinks this is a great project. Motion by Vice Chair Jordan, second by Chairman Gray to Adopt Resolution No. 2015-16; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Regarding Tentative Tract Map 36567 Located Northeast of Interstate 15 at Main Street approximately One -Quarter Mile Northeast of Camino Del Norte, Recommending to the City of Lake Elsinore Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2015-02. AYES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner Armit, Commissioner Fleming, Commissioner Ray NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Motion by Commissioner Armit, second by Commissioner Fleming to Adopt Resolution No. 2015-17; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Regarding Tentative Tract Map 36567 Located Northeast of Interstate 15 at Main Street approximately One -Quarter Mile Northeast of Camino Del Norte, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Adoption of Findings of Consistency with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). AYES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner Armit, Commissioner Fleming, Commissioner Ray NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None City of Lake Elsinore Page 14 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 17. 2015 4) ID# 14-488 Tentative Tract Map No. 36567 - Proposing the Subdivision of 67.69 Acres (APN 363-020-002, 003, 011 Through 015, and 018) Into 147 Single -Family Residential Lots, Two Open Space Lots, Three Open Space Lots for a Park and One Open Space[Water Quality Basin Lot; the Grading and Use of a City -Owned Parcel (APN 363-020-011) as Part of the Park; Located Northeast of Interstate 15 at Main Street approximately One -Quarter Mile Northeast of Camino Del Norte. 1. Adopt Resolution No, 2015-_; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Regarding Tentative Tract Map 36567 Located Northeast of Interstate 15 at Main Street approximately One -Quarter Mile Northeast of Camino Del Norte, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2015.02. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-_; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Regarding Tentative Tract Map 36567 Located Northeast of Interstate 15 at Main Street approximately One -Quarter Mile Northeast of Camino Del Norte, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Adoption of Findings of Consistency with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-_; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Tentative Tract Map 36567 Located Northeast of Interstate 15 at Main Street Approximately One -Quarter Mile Northeast of Camino Del Norte, Dividing Approximately 67.9 Acres Into 147 Single-family Residential Lots, Two Open Space Lots, Three Open Space Lots for a Park and One Open SpacelWater Quality basin lot, and The Grading and Use of an Adjacent City -owned Parcel as Part of the Park. City of lake Elsinore Page 13 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 17, 2015 Motion by Vice Chair Jordan, second by Commissioner Fleming to Adopt Resolution 2015-15; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336, Amendment No. 1 located on a 259 -acre site on the east side of Camino Del Norte at its intersection with Main Street, AYES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner Armit, Commissioner Fleming, Commissioner Ray NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None City o7 Lake Elsinore Page 12 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 17, 2015 Motion by Commissioner Armit, second by Chairman Gray to Adopt Resolution No. 2015-12, A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, Recommending to the City of Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Addendum #1 to Environmental Impact Report No. 2007-01 for Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005-02, Tentative Tract Map No, 35337, Amendment No. 1 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336, Amendment No. 1. AYES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner Armit, Commissioner Fleming, Commissioner Ray NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Motion by Commissioner Ray, second by Vice Chair Jordan to Adopt Resolution 2015-13; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Amendment No. 1 to Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005-02 located on a 259 -acre site on the east side of Camino Del Norte at its intersection with Main Street. AYES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner Armit, Commissioner Fleming, Commissioner Ray NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Motion by Vice Chair Jordan, second by Commissioner Armit to make a substitute motion to Adopt Resolution 2015-14; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 35337, Amendment No. 1 located on a 259 -acre site on the east side of Camino Del Norte at its intersection with Main Street; with the addition of a new Condition of Approval No. 161 a and all of the other Conditions as recommended. AYES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner Armit NOES: Commissioner Fleming, Commissioner Ray ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None City of Lake Elsinore Page 71 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 17, 2015 Planning Commission meeting Reconvened at 8:30p.m. Planning Manager Richard MacHott presented the next staff report. MacHott concluded presentation with offering that he or the applicant are available to answer questions regarding this project. Vice Chair Jordan wanted to clarify that the Parcel Map and Tentative Tract Map are already approved. Jordan questioned if the discussion they were having about these two maps, were the changes to Conditions of Approval. Manager MacHott informed her, that was correct. She suggested an addition to following Condition of Approval. Condition No. 171 on page 28 of 35 Add language about private streets included in CC&Rs. Commissioner Ray asked for a definition of a full street improvement from Main St at Del Norte, intersection south to Elsinore Hills Rd. Applicant Eric Lunde explained that their requirements under the traffic study were to do half width, he stated he agreed in working with the City in partnership to full width from Main St. to Elsinore Hills Rd. He commented that was a requirement above and beyond what they were supposed to do. Lunde also stated that they entered into a joint development agreement with the property to the north (Southshore 1) , and they have agreed when they come on line they will reimburse for half. Eric Lunde stated that he was in support of the staff report. He advised that there was a great deal of money and time trying to keep the house secure. There were K rails put up, fences, pits, rocks, paint, windows boarded up inside and out. They tried everything, they just couldn't keep anyone out of the property. Anything that had any value at all, or was fun to tear apart, was done. Grant Taylor Community Development Director responded to Eric Lunde's statement by saying, he spoke to the building official. The structural integrity is gone, it would cost a astronomical amount of money just to secure it. It's a safety issue and needs to be demolished. Commissioner Ray stated he would like to Amend to the Conditions of Approval. Condition No, 128 page 22 of 35 Include the full street improvements, inclusive of Street A, from Elsinore Hills Rd. to Street A. City of Lake Elsinore Page 10 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 17, 2015 Motion by Commissioner Fleming, second by Commissioner Armit to Adopt Resolution No. 2015-11; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 to Subdivide 150.8 Acres Located Adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, Between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and Extending to Hoff Avenue, Into Six Lots for Finance and Conveyance Purposes. AYES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner Armit, Commissioner Fleming, Commissioner Ray NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Planning Commission meeting took a 10 minute recess at 8:20p.m. 3) ID# 14-487 Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No 2005-02 Amendment No. 1 Tentative Tract Map No. 35337, Amendment No. 1 & Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336 Amendment No. 1 - Requests by Pacific Coves Investments LLC. to amend Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No 2005-02 and related Tentative Tract Map No. 35337 to Allow for the Demolition of an Existing Private Residence that Included Equestrian And Swimming Facilities Within Planning Area 3; and to Amend the Conditions of Approval for Approved Financing and Conveyance Parcel Map No. 35336 to Modify and/or Delete Previously Approved Conditions of Approval. 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2015 - _; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Addendum # 1 to Environmental Impact Report No. 2007-01 for Amendment No. 1 to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005.02, Tentative Tract Map No, 35337, Amendment No. 1 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 35336, Amendment No. 1. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-_; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Amendment No. 1 to Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005.02 located on a 259 -acre site on the east side of Camino Del Norte at its intersection with Main Street. 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-_; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Tentative Tract Map No. 35337, Amendment No. 1 located on a 259 -acre site on the east side of Camino Del Norte at its intersection with Main Street. 4. Adopt Resolution No. 2015- ; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Tentative Parcel Map No.35336, Amendment No. 1 located on a 259 -acre site on the east side of Camino Del Norte at its intersection with Main Street. City of Lake Elsinore Page 9 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 17, 2015 Motion by Commissioner Ray, Second by Commissioner Fleming to Propose a Substitute Motion to Adopt Resolution No. 2015-08 with the added Condition to require the project developer to install sidewalks on the northerly side of Terra Cotta Rd, between Lakeshore Dr. and Harrison Ave. AYES: Commissioner Fleming, Commissioner Ray NOES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner Armit ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 'Substitute Motion failed default to Original Motion to Adopt Resolution No. 2015-08 AYES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner Armit, Commissioner Fleming NOES: Commissioner Ray ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Motion by Chairman Gray, second by Vice Chair Jordan to Adopt Resolution No. 2015-09; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Regarding Property Located Adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, Between Terra Cotta and Dryden Street, and Extending to Hoff Avenue, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03. AYES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner Armit, Commissioner Fleming, Commissioner Ray NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Motion by Commissioner Fleming, second by Commissioner Armit to Adopt Resolution No. 2015-10; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557, to Subdivide 150.8 Acres Located Adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, Between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and Extending to Hoff Ave, Into 468 Single -Family Residential Lots, One 2.1 Acre Gross (1.6 Acre Net) Park Site, Seven Landscape Lots, Four Open Space Lots, One Sewer Lift Station Lot and Three Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) And Drainage Basin Lots. AYES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner Armit, Commissioner Fleming, Commissioner Ray NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None City o/ Lake Elsinore Page 8 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 17, 2015 Motion by Vice Chair Jordan, second by Commissioner Fleming to Adopt Resolution No, 2015-06; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Regarding Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and Related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No, 2012-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 36557, and Tentative Tract Map 36577 Located Adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and Extending to Hoff Avenue, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2015-01, AYES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner Armit, Commissioner Fleming, Commissioner Ray NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Motion by Chairman Gray, second by Armit to Adopt Resolution 2015-07; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Regarding Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and Related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No. 2012-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 36557, and Tentative Tract Map 36577 Located Adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, Between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and Extending to Hoff Avenue, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Adoption of Findings of Consistency with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). AYES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner Armit, Commissioner Fleming, Commissioner Ray NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Motion by Vice Chair Jordan, second by Chairman Gray to Adopt Resolution No. 2015-08; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Regarding Property Located Adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, Between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and Extending to Hoff Avenue, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and Approval of Zone Change No, 2012-05. City of Lake Elsinore page 7 Planning Commisslon Meeting Minutes March 17, 2015 Planning Manager Richard MacHott gave a full presentation. Applicant Dave Jeffers addressed Planning Commission and gave a brief introduction of the owners David Salene and Don Clurman. Jeffers quickly went over studies, plans and reports that went into the creation of this project along with a presentation. Jeffers thanked everyone who worked on this project and asked the Planning Commission for their approval. Resident Maria Castillo - Flores spoke about her concerns about the new project. She requested a solution for her concerns. She asked the City or the Developer to put in a block wall/sound wall barrier and a sidewalk along Terra Cotta Road on the opposite side of the development, and would like for the speed limit reduced. Resident Danny Perez lifetime resident expressed his concerns on the project's storm drain systems and his concerns about a planned detention basin above his property. Resident Margret Williams gave her testimony on this topic, She stated that her biggest problem with this project is the 4 -lane highway (Terra Cotta Road) behind her home. She wanted the Developer to build a block wall behind her house and to plant trees there as well. She said she would like some consideration from the Developer and the City of Lake Elsinore regarding her concerns. Resident Lisa Turner spoke on neighbor's behalf and read letters addressed to Planning Commission. She concluded with that these concerns from herself and other residents are not just noise concerns but there is a matter of privacy and safety as well. Vice Chair Jordan explained, that she did go look at the location that the residents were speaking about so she could get a better understanding of what their concerns were and said she would go look again. Jordan recommended that when these improvements do start, the residents should come down and speak to the City and see if there is something that could be done to work with them on these concerns. Applicant Dave Jeffers responded to residents concerns with regards to the project. Jeffers explained, they are just implementing the City's General Plan. Planning Commissioner Ray asked for clarification from Planning Commission, Project Developers and their staff on project with regards to future traffic and he needed a better understanding of the Terracina Specific Plan. Attorney Sam Alhadeff explained rules on development. He assured residents that they have done what is necessary to comply with the rules. He thanked everyone for coming and listening, as well as voicing their opinions. Carl Ballard, the applicant's Traffic Engineer, explained the traffic studies that were completed for the project and addressed residents concerns. He gave clarification to Planning Commissioner Ray's inquiry on traffic and speed on the roads surrounding this project. He stated that we are we well within the road's capacity of assigned vehicles per day. City of Lake Elsinore Page 6 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 17, 2015 4. Adopt Resolution No. 2015w ;A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Regarding Property Located Adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, Between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and Extending to Hoff Avenue, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03. 5. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-_; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557, to Subdivide 150.8 Acres Located Adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, Between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and Extending to Hoff Avenue, Into 468 Single -Family Residential Lots, One 2.1 Acre Gross (1.6 Acre Net) Park Site, Seven Landscape Lots, Four Open Space Lots, One Sewer Lift Station Lot and Three Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) And Drainage Basin Lots. 6. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-_; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 to Subdivide 150.6 Acres Located Adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, Between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and Extending to Hoff Avenue, Into Six Lots For Finance and Conveyance Purposes. City of Lake Elsinore Page 5 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 17, 2015 Planner Agustin Resendiz presented his staff report . Resendiz advised the Planning Commission that Planning received a letter from Caltrans indicating that they were requesting a relocation of the project's driveway on Joy Street to be further away from Riverside Dr.; to allow easier traffic flow and access into the project site. He explained that action could not be taken at tonight's hearing because the site plan revision also required a revision to this project's Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP). Additionally, the revised PWQMP could itself result in an additional need to revise the site plan. For this reason, staff requested that the matter be continued in order to allow time for the applicant to complete the revised PWQMP and for the City to complete its WQMP review process. Staff provided a copy of the revised site plan for the Commission's review and comments in an effort to facilitate action by the Planning Commission at its Tuesday, April 7, 2015 meeting. Chairman Gray continued this public hearing until Tuesday, April 7, 2015 Planning Commission Meeting. 2) ID# 14-486 Terracing Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and Related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No. 2012-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557 and Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 - Applications bV Spectrum Communities, Proposing a 150.8 -Acre Residential Development, with Approximately 76.5 Acres of Residential (468 Dwelling^ Units) 22 acres of Open Space, 22.5 Acres of Roadways, 1.6 Acres of Park (2.1 Gross Acres), and 28.2 Acres of Graded Slopes and Basins, located adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and extending to Hoff Avenue. 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2015- ;A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Regarding Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and Related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No. 2012-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 36557, and Tentative Tract Map 36577 Located Adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and Extending to Hoff Avenue, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration No, 2015-01. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2015- ;A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Regarding Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and Related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No, 2012-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 36557, and Tentative Tract Map 36577 Located Adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, Between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and Extending to Hoff Avenue, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Adoption of Findings of Consistency with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2015- ;A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Regarding Property Located Adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, Between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and Extending to Hoff Avenue, Recommending to the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approval of Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012.01) and Approval of Zone Change No. 2012-05. City o7 Lake Elsinore Page 4 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 17, 2015 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM(S) 1) ID# 14-485 Approval of Minutes It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve the Minutes as submitted. Motion By Vice Chair Jordan, second by Commissioner Armit to approve Commission Minutes for January 6 & 20, 2015; motion passed by roll call vote as follows: AYES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner Armit, NOES: None ABSTAIN: Commissioner Fleming, Commissioner Ray ABSENT: None PUBLIC HEARING ITEM(S) 5) ID# 14-489 Commercial Design Review No. 2014-13, Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-09 And Variance No. 2014-02 - A Request by AGC Design Concept for the Development of a New 4,500 Square -Foot Circle K Convenience Store with a 2,620 Square -Foot Canopy with Five Gasoline Dispensers and Freestanding 1,085 Square -Foot Automated Car Wash, Located on the Southwest Corner of the Intersection of Riverside Drive and Joy Street (APN: 379-132-013). The Proposed Variance is a Request to Reduce the Amount of Required Landscaping Adjacent to the Residential Development on the West Side of the Project Site and to Allow the Freestanding Pylon Sign to Exceed the Maximum Height Set Forth in the Municipal Code for the Project Site. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1. Take testimony from any interested parties in attendance who have responded to the Notice of Public Hearing. 2. Keep the public hearing open and continue the matter to the Planning Commission's April 7, 2015 meeting. City of Lake Elsinore Page 3 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 17, 2015 ROLL CALL Present: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner Armit, Commissioner Fleming, and Commissioner Ray Also Present City Attorney Leibold, Community Development Director Taylor, Planning Manager MacHott and Office Specialist Wells. PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON AGENDIZED ITEMS — 3 MINUTES City o/ Lake Elsinore Page 2 ellyr City of Lake Elsinore LAKE LS111(-)R-E Meeting Minutes Planning Commission JOHN GRAY, CHAIRMAN SHELLY JORDAN, VICE CHAIRPERSON ADAM ARMIT, COMMISSIONER TIM FLEMING, COMMISSIONER LANCE RAY, COMMISSIONER GRANT TAYLOR, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR RICHARD J. MACHOTT, PLANNING MANAGER Tuesday, March 17, 2015 6:00 PM LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE CULTURAL CENTER 183 N. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the Planning Commission with valuable information regarding issues of the community. Meetings are normally held on the 1st and 3rd Tuesday of every month. If you are attending this Planning Commission Meeting, please park in the Parking Lot across the street from the Cultural Center, This will assist us in limiting the impact of meetings on the Downtown Business District. Thank you for your cooperation. The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting outside of City Hall and is available at each meeting. The agenda and related reports are also available in the Community Development Department on the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the Community Development Department at (951) 674-3124, ext. 297, at least 48 hours before the meeting to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Any writings distributed within 72 hours of the meeting will be made available to the public at the time it is distributed to the Planning Commission CALL TO ORDER Chairman Gray called the Planning Commission meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Armit led the Pledge of Allegiance. City of Lake Elsinore Page r Cultural Center Planniny commission Meeting Minutes - Draft January 6, 2015 Commissioner Michael O'Neal briefed the Planning Commission that he will formally present his resignation from the Planning Commission on Tuesday, January 13, 2015 at the City Council meeting. Vice Chair Jordan stated that she enjoyed being on Planning Commission with Commissioner O'Neal and that he will truly be missed and that his shoes will be very hard to fill. Jordan thanked O'Neal on behalf of herself and staff for his 10 years of commitment. Chairman John Gray also thanked O'Neal for his years of service, and the mentoring presence he has been to the Planning Commission and that his knowledge of the City is extraordinary. He added that O'Neal has always had thoughtful comments and a caring concern for the well being of the City and its residents, and shared that he will indeed be missed, Community Development Director Taylor announced that he was sad to report that former Planning Commissioner John Gonzales passed and it was unexpected and recommended that the meeting be closed in memory of Mr. Gonzales, ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chairman Gray adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 6:53 p.m. in honor of former Commissioner Gonzales. The next Regular Planning Commission Meeting will be held on January 20, 2015 at 6:00 p.m. at the Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, RICHARD J. MACHOTT, Planning Manager, do hereby affirm that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall, 72 hours in advance of this meeting. //ss// January 6, 2015 Richard J. MacHott, LEED Green Associate Planning Manager City of Laku Elsinore Page 6 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Draft January 6, 2015 Community Development Director Grant Taylor presented his staff report on a Development Agreement with the Lake Elsinore Outlet Center. Taylor explained that the Development Agreement would allow the property owners to develop four additional building pads on the westerly end new the Arco station in return the property owners would improve the Collier Avenue median and installing a bridge sign on the Nichols Road overpass over the 1-15 freeway. He described renovations and improvements on Outlet Center and expected time of completion for project should be in late spring. He also stated that Development Agreement would have a five-year life. Commissioner O'Neal asked if there had been outreach to the arts community regarding the center median. Community Development Director Taylor stated that Studio 395 had been involved with the design. Vice Chair Jordan questioned applicant about the blank signs along the 15 Freeway and if they will be filled in. '1 -he applicant replied and said they are currently in the process of working through different tenants and with sign manufacturer and getting the all work done, that they take time to get them all generated and produced. He expects that the rest of the sign panels should be up within the next 60 days. Commissioner Amit asked the applicant regarding the site plan which shows restaurants. The applicant responded that they are looking for more restaurants and also a tire store to serve the City's residents. Commissioner Gray stated that this has certainly been an enhancement. Motion By Commissioner O'Neal, second by Commissioner Armit to adopt Resolution No. 2014-01, A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Recommending City Council Approval of a Development Agreement between the City of Lake Elsinore and Mohr Affinity LLC. AYES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner Armit, Commissioner O'Neal NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None BUSINESS ITEMS).- None STAFF COMMENTS - None COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS City of Lake Elsinore+ P,,ge 5 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Draft January 6, 2015 single-family lots. Community Development Director Taylor stated that the reference was to the previous approval. Mr. Booze asked that the Commission keep with the 369 lot approval rather than the current project as proposed. Resident Lori Perez shared her thoughts on a 55 mph speed limit and traffic. Resident Maria Castillo spoke on the issues she had with project and growth of the City. She said that she wants a sound barrier wall, 10 foot high at least, with plantings to help with the noise. She expressed a concern with cars leaving Terra Cotta and ending up in her back yard, She stated that she was unhappy about it and realizes growth with happen but it does not have to happen at such a fast rate. Motion by Vice Chair Jordan, second by Commissioner Armit; to continue this public hearing until February 17, 2015. Motion passed by roll call as follows: AYES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner Armit, Commission O'Neal NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None 2) ID# 14401 Development Agreement - Outlet Center: A request for a Development Agreement by and between the City of Lake Elsinore and Mohr Affinity, LLC to 11 vest Citv regulations in connection with the future expansion of the Lake Elsinore Outlet Center, and 2) insure the completion of improvements to the Collier Avenue median and installation of a freeway bridge sign. The subject property totals 46.5 acres and is located at 17600 Collier Avenue (APN 389-210-063, 064 and 066). It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve and adopt Resolution No. 2015-_; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City Of Lake Elsinore, California, Recommending City Council Approval of a Development Agreement between the City of Lake Elsinore and Mohr Affinity LLC. Cil, of Lake Elsmo ,r Page 4 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Draft January 6, 2015 Community Development Director Grant Taylor recommended that the Planning Commission keep the public hearing open and continue the matter to the Planning Commission's February 17, 2015 meeting. The Planning Commission took testimony from interested parties who responded and attended the Notice of Public Hearing. Member of the public, Ray Booze expressed his concerns with the project, such as possible safety issues with traffic due to growing population. He expressed his concern that project traffic would travel though existing neighborhoods on unsafe streets and the future inability of existing residents to continue to rnake left turns from Dryden Street onto Lakeshore Drive to reach shopping areas. Vice Chair Jordan explained to Mi. Booze that this project has already been approved many years ago and any opportunity to undo this project is no longer possible, although; she appreciates his concern. Jordan also encouraged Mr. Booze to speak with Planning and Engineering Departments for further details regarding projected traffic patterns. Chairman Gray thanked Mr. Booze for his questions and interest. Gray also stated that the City also shares his concerns and safety of the citizens and residents, and these matters are carefully taken into account and can get a thorough explanation at the City office. Community Development Director Grant Taylor affirmed that this project was approved back in November 2004, but invited Mr. Booze to come and speak with the City with any further concerns. Danny Perez, lifetime resident of Lake Elsinore spoke about his concerns about the increasing population, water conservation, traffic, and not enough schools to facilitate population. He stated that he believes that developers should pay for all infrastructure improvements needed to serve the City's population increases. He stated that other cities like Corona, Murrieta and Temecula are making infrastructure improvements to serve their populations. Vice Chair .Jordan reiterated to Mr. Perez that these approved plans are moving forward and understands his concerns. Jordan explained that the City has looked at this project long and hard for many years and has come up with the best transportation, traffic analysis and solutions that they could come up with. Commissioner Armit commented that cities like Corona, Murrieta and Temecula are able to make these improvements, including freeway improvements, because with their larger populations they have more traffic and therefore are able to get more money to pay for these improvements. Karen Ruelke, resident of Lake Elsinore since 2004. Ruelke commented that she heard that the proposed speed limit on 'Terra Cotta was going to be 55 miles per hour and was unhappy about it and offered her opinion and suggestions Ruelke inquired if a slower speed limit would be considered. Commissioner Aimit asked City Engineer Walter Allison to explain how a speed limit is determined on a road, Allison explained procedure of traffic survey and why streets have a certain speed limit. Community Development Director Taylor added that these testimonies and concerns will be continued and addressed at a later date. Resident April Booze sent in an e-mail in opposition to the project to Community Development Director Taylor. Taylor explained the e-mail echoed the comments and concerns the members of the public spoke on tonight. Mi. Booze asked for clarification as to whether this project was a done deal or if the Commission was referring to the earlier approval for 369 City 0 Lake Elsinore Paye 3 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Draft January 6, 2015 PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON AGENDIZED ITEMS — 3 MINUTES CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM(S) - None 1) ID# 14400 Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and Related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No. 2012-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 - Applications by Spectrum Communities. Proposing a 150.8 -Acre Residential Development with Approximately 76.5 Acres of Residential (468 Dwelling Units), 22 acres of Open Space, 22.5 Acres of Roadways, 1.6 Acres of Park (2.1 Gross Acres) and 28.2 Acres of Graded Slopes and Basins, located adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and extending to Hoff Avenue Staff recommends that the Planning Commission, 1. Take testimony from any interested parties in attendance who have responded to the Notice of Public Hearing. Z Keep the public hearing open and continue the matter to the Planning Commission's February 17, 2015 meeting. City of Lake Elsinore page 2 City of Lake Elsinore e:w..y. Dpi'. �• Y.I L1 -.u: Meeting Minutes - Draft Planning Commission Tuesday, January 6, 2015 JOHN GRAY, CHAIRMAN SHELLY JORDAN, VICE CHAIRPERSON ADAM ARMIT, COMMISSIONER MICHAEL O'NEAL, COMMISSIONER VACANT, COMMISSIONER GRANTTAYLOR, COMMUNI TY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR RICHARD J. MACHOTT, PLANNING MANAGER 6:00 PM A IKE.-ELSINORF_.ORG -95 1) 674-3124 PI-IONE CULTURAL CF.N I I 163 N. MAIN STRGr_T LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the Planning Commission with valuable information regarding issues of the community. Meetings are normally held on the 1st and 3rd Tuesday of every month. If you are attending this Planning Commission Meeting, please park in the Parking Lot across the street from the Cultural Center. This will assist us in limiting the impact of meetings on the Downtown Business District. Thank you for your cooperation. The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting outside of City Hall and is available at each meeting. The agenda and related reports are also available in the Community Development Department on the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the Community Development Department at (951) 6743124, ext. 289, at least 48 hours before the meeting to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Any writings distributed within 72 hours of the meeting will be made available to the public at the time it is distributed to the Planning Commission. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Gray called the Planning Commission meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Vice Chair Jordan led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Chainnan Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner O'Neal, Commissioner An -nit City of L,ke EI,(nor,o AY1 Cultural Center Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 2, 2014 BUSINESS ITEM(S) - None STAFF COMMENTS Community Development Director Grant Taylor briefed that Planning Department is continuing to get some Commercial and Industrial interest, Planning hopes to be bringing Planning Commission projects in 2015. Also in the beginning 2015, the City is looking to fill in former Commissioner Blake's position on Planning Commission and that the City Clerk's Office will be advertising at the first of the year to get that spot cleared quickly. COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS Commissioner O'Neal questioned Taylor about the airport being moved. Taylor answered, there is consideration to potentially pursue relocation further south and he is anticipating a application in the near future. ADJOURNMENT The next regular Planning Commission meeting will be held on Tuesday, December 16, 2014, at the Cultural Center, 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING John Gray, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore Attest: Richard J. MacHott, LEED Green Associate Planning Manager City of Lake Elsinore Paye 6 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 2, 2014 Danny Perez had his concerns and legalities about the storm drain system on his property, and what future development means for his property. He made a suggestion on alternative options and hopes Planning Commission takes those into consideration. Margaret Williams stated her concerns on expansion of Terra Cotta, a four -lane highway that is going to be built behind her property, and the increase in noise, dirt and dust from traffic and exhaust fumes. She said, she was not concerned with the development but hoped that the City of Lake Elsinore would help with a block wall. Commissioner O'Neal encouraged community, if they are unhappy with outcome of January 6th meeting, go to City Council because they are the final arbitrator of this, he informed them that Planning Commission is not the end of the story, we just make a recommendation to City Council and City Council will approve or disapprove and make their changes. O'Neal said, this is just the first step to this process. Lisa Turner spoke on her concerns regarding speed on future four -lane highway. She has expressed her issues with the Development that would be going on behind her home and what kind on problems it would create for her and residents in that area. Maria Castillo resides above the hill. She expressed she had the same concerns that the other residents spoke on. She shared her interest in the developer putting up a block wall for the community she lives in. Castillo wondered and questioned the noise of construction and how it would affect the quality of life. Chairman Gray recognized the residents and explained their comments were now a matter of record, and they will be addressed in a public hearing or in with staff and hoped some satisfactory solutions are found. Gray thanked all residents on voicing their concerns. Developer Jeffers acknowledged all speakers and thanked them for all their comments and concerns. He briefly addressed some of the issues, such as Terra Cotta, he explained it has been on the books for decades and it was originally approved with the original tract. He explained the it does have impacts, however it is not a new project. He said as far as construction; they were going to try to minimize the impact of the grading by bringing in the trucks from the North, and make it their main access point when they get into grading operations for the project. He recognized that there was a need for a block wall for the existing community but explained that they would not be responsible for putting one up, since that is not their development. Jeffers stated that he is available to speak with anyone who had questions regarding this project. Motion by Commissioner O'Neal, second by Vice Chair Jordan; to approve to continue this public hearing until January 6, 2015. Motion passed by roll call as follows: AYES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner O'Neal NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None City of Lake Elsinore Page 5 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 2, 2014 3) ID# 14-363 Terracina Specific Plan ISP No. 2012-01) and Related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No. 2012-05 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No 36577 -Applications by Spectrum Communities. Proposing a 150.8 -Acre Residential Development, with Approximately 76.5 Acres of Residential (468 Dwelling Units) 22 acres of Open Space 22.5 Acres of Roadways, 1.6 Acres of Park 12.1 Gross Acres), and 28.2 Acres of Graded Slopes and Basins located adjacent to Lakeshore Drive. between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street and extending to Hoff Avenue. 1. Take testimony from any interested parties in attendance who have responded to the Notice of Public Hearing, 2. Keep the public hearing open and continue the matter to the Planning Commission's January 6, 2015 meeting. Planning Manager MacHott presented Staff report. He explained the project, where it was located, different phases and plans for development. He advised the Commission of the concerns local residents had regarding this development such as noise and traffic. Due to the number of concerns that were raised by the residents and the lack of time to address them with the applicant, staff was recommending a continuance. Also, there were extensive Conditions of Approval on the project and he explained that the Planning Division wanted to give the applicant ample time to review those Conditions and discuss them with staff and see if there are any issues. Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission take testimony this evening from all people present and to keep the Public Hearing open and continue the matter to the Planning Commission's January 6, 2015 meeting. MacHott also added that he received an e-mail form April Booze, a resident of Lake Elsinore. She asked MacHott to print it out and distribute it to the Commissioners. Applicant representative Dave Jeffers with David Jeffers Consulting, Inc. requested to speak. He said that his Company has been contracted by the Developers, Spectrum Community, also known as Terracina Investors, LLC, to prepare the Specific Plan, tentative maps and financing maps. He explained they have been working with staff for 2 1/2 years on this project. He explained that they tried to capture views of the lake, with view lots or partial view lots in the development. Jeffers said he was available for questions or concerns. Ray Booze, a 14 -year resident of the area addressed the Commission. He explained that he lives overlooking the area of the proposed site. He expressed his concerns on project and had questions for clarification on the matter. Booze concluded that he thought there was just too much building in a small area. City of Lake Elsinore Page 4 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 2, 2014 2) ID# 14-362 Residential Design Review No. 2013-09 Modification #1 - A Request by Pardee Homes for Approval of a New Summerfield Building and Model Home Product To Construct Instead of the Previously Approved Amberleaf Building Product on 85 Lots within Tracts 36115 and 36116-1 of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2014-_; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Approving Residential Design Review No. 2013-09 Modification #1 within Tract Map No. 36115 and 36116.1, based on the Findings and Exhibits, and subject to the proposed Conditions of Approval. Senior Planner Justin Kirk presented his staff report. Planner Kirk explained the original tracts of the project were approved in December 2010 and January 2011 and the design review was approved in March 2014. He stated that there are no changes to the number, size or dimensions of the lots. The application is was just changing architectural design so it is consistent with the previously approved tract map. He described the designs to be Italian,Traditional and Spanish design. Planner Kirk said the project is consistent with the specific plan, the general plan and all of the other relevant development in the area. Staff is recommending approval of the proposed modifications. The applicant Mike Taylor with Pardee Homes addressed the Conditions and clarified the project and explained that they are trying to be consistent with the look they are doing on all the other houses in this phase of the development. Planning Manager MacHott asked if the applicant would be able to submit revised exhibits within 30 days, rather than prior to plan submittal. Taylor replied Yes. MacHott recommended that the Commisison Modify Condition 7 to require the revised exhibits to be submitted to Planning within 30 days from tonight. There were no other Conditions applicant was concerned about on this matter. Motion by Commissioner O'Neal, second by Vice Chair Jordan to approve Resolution No. 2014-45; A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Approving Residential Design Review No. 2013-09 Modification #1 with Tract Map No. 36115 and 36116-1, based on the Findings and Exhibits, and subject to the proposed Conditions of Approval with a Amended Condition #7 adding the requirement that the applicant submit revised documents to Planning, which reflect the changes requested by the Commission within 30 days; Motion passed by roll call as follows: AYES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner O'Neal NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None City of Lake Elsinore Page 3 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes December 2, 2014 PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON AGENDIZED ITEMS — 3 MINUTES - None CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM(S) - None PUBLIC HEARING ITEM(S) 1) ID# 14-361 Minor Design Review - A Request to Construct a 3.347 Sauare-foot Single-family Dwelling with an Attached 708 square -foot Three -car Garage located on the Southeast Corner of Summerhill Drive and Canyon Ridge. (APN: 363-273-026) 1 Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1. Take testimony from any interested parties in attendance who have responded to the Notice of Public Hearing. 2. Continue the public hearing for the subject Minor Design Review off calendar.] Planning Manager MacHott requested a continuance of the matter off -calendar; to be rescheduled for a later meeting. Motion by Chairman Gray, Second by Vice Chair Jordan to continue Planning Commission Item. AYES: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner O'Neal NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Commissioner Armit City of Lake Elsinore Page 2 tIIY 01 mom. City of Lake Elsinore L(1K�L �LS!I CRE � r I) I' ll, : Meeting Minutes Planning Commission Tuesday, December 2, 2014 JOHN GRAY, CHAIRMAN SHELLY JORDAN, VICE CHAIRPERSON ADAM ARMIT, COMMISSIONER MICHAEL O'NEAL, COMMISSIONER VACANT, COMMISSIONER GRANT TAYLOR, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR RICHARD J. MACHOTT, PLANNING MANAGER 6:00 PM LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE CULTURAL CENTER 183 N. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the Planning Commission with valuable information regarding issues of the community. Meetings are normally held on the 1st and 3rd Tuesday of every month. If you are attending this Planning Commission Meeting, please park in the Parking Lot across the street from the Cultural Center. This will assist us in limiting the impact of meetings on the Downtown Business District. Thank you for your cooperation. The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting outside of City Hall and is available at each meeting. The agenda and related reports are also available in the Community Development Department on the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the Community Development Department at (951) 674-3124, ext. 289, at least 48 hours before the meeting to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Any writings distributed within 72 hours of the meeting will be made available to the public at the time it is distributed to the Planning Commission. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Gray called the Planning Commission meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Jordan led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Chairman Gray, Vice Chair Jordan, Commissioner O'Neal Absent: Commissioner Arm it City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Cultural Center CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SP 2012-01, GPA 2012-03, ZC 2012-05, VTTM 36557, TTM 36577 May 12, 2015 Page 7 of 7 Approval No. 151). Additionally, VTTM 36557 Condition of Approval 152 requires the applicant to consent to the formation of a Community Facilities District or annex into the proposed Community Facilities District No. 2015-2 (Maintenance Services) to fund the on- going operation and maintenance of the public right-of-way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public right-of- way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison, including parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project. The same conditions of approval have been applied to the Terracina Specific Plan (Conditions 124 and 125). The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557 is also conditioned for payment of all applicable development impact fees at the rate in effect at the time the application for VTTM 36557 was deemed complete plus inflationary increases and such other reasonable increases in effect at time of payment as contemplated under the current LEMC. Future development impact fees adopted by the City will not apply to this project, unless VTTM 36557 is not adopted or, alternatively, VTTM 36557 expires. Prepared by: Richard J. MacHott, LEED Green Associate Planning Manager Grant Taylor Director of Community Development Approved by: Grant Yates City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Aerial Map 3. City Council Resolutions and Ordinance 4. Conditions of Approval for SP 2012-01 5. Conditions of Approval for VTTM 36557 6. Conditions of Approval for TTM 36577 7. Terracina Specific Plan 8. Vesting Tract No. 36557 9. Tract No. 36577 10. Initial Study for Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2015-01 11. Response to Comments 12. Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program 13. Centex Tentative Tract No. 32786 14. Planning Commission Staff Report 3-17-15 15. Planning Commission 12-2-14, 1-6-15 and 3-17-15 Minutes CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SP 2012-01, GPA 2012-03, ZC 2012-05, VTTM 36557, TTM 36577 May 12, 2015 Page 6 of 7 the meeting. After an overview of the project by the applicants a number of questions and concerns were voiced including but not limited to: • Some existing residences do not have block walls along Terra Cotta • Noise impacts • Lighting impacts • Traffic impacts (most common concern) • Construction activities, days and times • Grading of sloped areas • Right-of-way dedications • Water availability (drought impacts) • Project phasing Environmental Determination The City conducted an Initial Study to determine if the Project would result in significant impacts on the environment. Based upon the results of the Initial Study, there was substantial evidence that any potential impacts to the environment associated with the Project could be mitigated to less than significant levels. For this reason, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2015-01 was prepared in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.: 'CEQK) and the State Implementation Guidelines for CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15000, et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines") and applicable requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore, to disclose potential environmental impacts and to propose mitigation for those impacts. City staff received four comment letters on the MND during the 30 -day public review comment period which began on October 16, 2014 and ended on November 17, 2014. Copies of the comment letters and responses to those letters are attached to this staff report. Fiscal Impact The time and costs related to processing Specific Plan No. 2012-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No. 2012-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557, and Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 have been covered by the Developer Deposit paid for by the applicant. No General Fund budgets have been allocated or used in the processing of this application. In order to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City, the project has been conditioned that the applicant consent to the formation of a Community Facilities District or annex into the proposed Community Facilities District No. 2015-1 (Safety) the Law Enforcement, Fire and Paramedic Services Mello -Roos Community Facilities District (VTTM 36557 Condition of CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SP 2012-01, GPA 2012-03, ZC 2012-05, VTTM 36557, TTM 36577 May 12, 2015 Page 5 of 7 Access Terracina Specific Plan and related Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557 have been conditioned to construct full road improvements adjacent to the project site and to extend Terra Cotta Road from the project boundary to Nichols Road. This means that the project will ultimately have access from two main roadways (Lakeshore and Nichols Road), as well as providing additional paved access to existing residential development in proximity to the project site. Design Elements, Guidelines and Standards Chapter V of the Terracina Specific Plan includes Architectural and Landscape Guidelines. The architectural and landscaping guidelines are non-specific, and in some cases vague. The applicant's intent is to allow maximum flexibility for the ultimate builder(s) of the Terracina Specific Plan. However, the builder(s) will be required to comply with the City's Design Review process and the Planning Commission and City Council will have the opportunity to approve the design of all homes constructed within the specific plan. The Specific Plan does require the use of drought—tolerant California native plants in landscaping of slopes and open space areas. Additionally, staff has conditioned VTTM 36557 that its landscape plan shall provide for California native drought -tolerant ground cover, shrubs, and trees. Recreation Area/Park The City's implementation of the Quimby Act requires developments to provide five (5) acres of useable park land per 1,000 population or to pay equivalent in -lieu fees. Using this standard, the Terracina project is required to provide 7.9 acres of usable park land based upon 468 dwelling units and 3.37 persons per dwelling unit. Village 3 contains a 1.6 acre net (2.1 acre gross) park site centrally located in Village 3 for use by residents of the entire project. This will be a Homeowners Association (HOA) maintained facility and the project has been conditioned that full required park fees will be paid by the project development, with no credit for the HOA -maintained park. Additionally, the applicant is proposing that "Commercial child day care centers" be allowed at the Village 3 recreation area/park subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Staff has added a condition of approval requiring that such a use would only be allowed if the Village 3 Recreation Area is made sufficiently larger to maintain a minimum 2.1 acre gross (1.6 acre net) park site independent of the area used for the commercial child day care center and associated playgrounds. (Specific Plan Condition No. 5.) Community Outreach Meeting On the evening of Tuesday, November 25, 2014, the project proponents held a Community Outreach Meeting at the Terra Cotta Middle School, Approximately 30 persons attended CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SP 2012-01, GPA 2012-03, ZC 2012-05, VTTM 36557, TTM 36577 May 12, 2015 Page 4 of 7 density designation applies only to Village 1 while Villages 2 through 6 are Low -Medium designations. Each of the villages serves as a different phase of development. General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03 General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03 is a request to amend the land use designation on Assessor's Parcel Numbers 378-040-004 and 005, 389-180-001 and 002, and 389-190- 002 from Low -Medium Density Residential (LMR) to Specific Plan (SP) and on Assessor's Parcel Numbers 378-040-006, 007 and 012 from Low Density Residential (LR) to Specific Plan (SP). Zone Change No. 2012-05 The applicant requests approval of a change to the zoning of the City's Official Zoning Map ("Zone Change") for the subject site; said Zone Change requesting to change the zoning on the subject property from R-1 (Single -Family Residential District) to SP (Specific Plan). Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557 proposes the subdivision of the 150.8 acres project site into 468 single-family residential lots, one 2.1 acre gross (1.6 acre net) park site, seven landscape lots, four open space lots, one sewer lift station lot and three Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and drainage basin lots. Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 is a proposed subdivision of the project site into six (6) lots for the purpose of Financing and Conveyance only. No grading permits, building permits or other development will be allowed with this approval. Analysis Density and Intensity of Use There are two existing General Plan Land Use Designations for the 151 -acre site: Low Density Residential ("LDR") and Low -Medium Density Residential ("LMR") The LDR designation comprises 26.9 acres and is located in the southerly area of the site. The LMR designation is for the remainder of the site, or 123.9 acres. The maximum lot yield for the LDR designation is 3.0 du/ac (dwelling units per acre) while the maximum lot yield for the LMR designation is 6.0 du/ac., thereby generating a maximum yield for the overall site of 824 dwelling units. The Terracina SP is consistent with the land use designation with its proposed maximum of 468 dwelling units. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SP 2012-01, GPA 2012-03, ZC 2012-05, VTTM 36557, TTM 36577 May 12, 2015 Page 3 of 7 05. The Commission unanimously (5-0) recommended approval of the related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557, and Tentative Tract Map No. 36577. Proiect Location The project site is located southwesterly of Interstate 15 on the northern side of existing Lakeshore Drive between Dryden Street and Terra Cotta Road. The northern portion of the site is bounded by Dolbeer Street and Holt Avenue. The 150.8 -acre irregular-shaped site is characterized by a hill or knoll in the westerly portion and gently rolling terrain for the remainder of the site extending to the east. Lakeshore Drive, Terra Cotta Road, Dryden Street, Stoddard Street, Swan Avenue, Dolbeer Street, Hoff Avenue, Grey Avenue and Pierce Street all currently provide frontage and access to and from the site by existing street improvements and/or dedicated right-of-way. Previously Approved Development Plan (TTM 32786) In November 2004, Centex Homes submitted an application (Tentative Tract Map No. 32786) to subdivide the subject property into 369 single-family lots and 17 open space lots. On October 11, 2005, the Lake Elsinore City Council approved Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 32786 (Attachment 11). Minimum lot sizes were 6,000 square feet, with an average of 7,200 square feet. TTM 32786 included a 12,300 square foot private community "pocket park". As a result of a City Council approved extension of time and additional extensions of time applied as a result of amendments to the California Subdivision Map Act, TTM 32786 now has an expiration date of October 11, 2016. The map is still eligible for one additional 12 -month extension of time through the City's Map Extension process. Project Description Terracina Specific Plan No. 2012-01 The applicant requests approval of the Terracina Specific Plan No. 2012-01 relating to properties located adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and extending to Hoff Avenue (APN 378-040-004 through 007, 378-040-012, 389- 180-001 and 002, and 389-190-002), in order to develop a master planned development with approximately 76.5 acres of single-family residential development (468 dwelling units), 22 acres of open space, 22.5 acres of roadways, 1.6 acres of park (2.1 gross acres), and 28.2 acres of graded slopes and basins. The proposed Specific Plan divides the irregular-shaped 151 -acre site into six (6) separate, individual planning areas or "villages" ranging in size from 7.8 acres to 29.9 acres. These planning areas will have a variety of lot sizes offering a variety of housing product in an effort to create distinction in the community. The six (6) Villages are broken down into only two (2) land use designations: "Low", and "Low Medium" density residential. The Low CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SP 2012-01, GPA 2012-03, ZC 2012-05, VTTM 36557, TTM 36577 May 12, 2015 Page 2 of 7 Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and Related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No. 2012-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 36557, and Tentative Tract Map 36577, 3. Approve and Introduce by title only and waive further reading of Ordinance No. 2015- _; An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Adopting the Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and Adopting Zone Change No. 2012-05 for 150.8 Acres Located Adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, Between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and Extending to Hoff Avenue. 4. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Approving General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03 for 150.8 Acres Located Adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, Between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and Extending to Hoff Avenue. 5. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-_; A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557, to Subdivide 150.8 Acres Located Adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, Between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and Extending to Hoff Avenue. 6. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-_; A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approving Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 to Subdivide 150.8 Acres Located Adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, Between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and Extending to Hoff Avenue, Into Six Lots For Finance And Conveyance Purposes. Background The Planning Commission held three public hearings (December 2, 2014, January 6, 2015 and March 17, 2015) regarding the project. At the meetings, members of the public spoke and expressed their concerns with the project, which included: • Safety concerns regarding future speed limits on Terra Cotta. • Noise impacts • Requests for block walls at rear of existing residential lots on Terra Cotta. • Lighting impacts • Traffic impacts (Through existing neighborhoods, lack of left turn movement from Dryden to Lakeshore, and the long-term 4 -lane improvement of Terra Cotta Road) • Water availability (drought impacts) • Drainage impacts On March 17, 2015, the City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission considered the public testimony and voted 4-1 (Commissioner Ray opposed) to recommend approval of the proposed Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and related Zone Change No. 2012- ('11 ]'Y"^ - C)1,, 71 LAKELSI1 Ol L REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor And Members of the City Council FROM: Grant Yates City Manager DATE: May 12, 2015 SUBJECT: Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and Related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No. 2012-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557, and Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 - Applications by Spectrum Communities, Proposing a 150.8 -Acre Residential Development, with Approximately 76.5 Acres of Residential (468 Dwelling Units), 22 acres of Open Space, 22.5 Acres of Roadways, 1.6 Acres of Park (2.1 Gross Acres), and 28.2 Acres of Graded Slopes and Basins, located adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and extending to Hoff Avenue. APPLICANT/ Terracina Investors, LLC, c/o Spectrum Communities, 3334 E. OWNER Coast Highway #605, Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 Recommendation The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions: Adopt Resolution No. 2015-_, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2015-01 For The Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and Related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No. 2012-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 36557, and Tentative Tract Map 36577. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-; A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Adopting Findings of Consistency with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) for the Terracina Specific VICINITY MAP TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 2012-01) GPA 2012-03, ZC 2012-05, VTM 36557, TTM 36577 ciry or�_ L�KILS11 I)RI AM IX1RIAU N O N G w W d � T a N C O @ 0 O C O N C K W N W rn m m N N U W U w m }c a @ @ O @ n O N g o @ N V m m c n E o E N E o @ c 0 0 0 o m m m @ a w u > o c T E w @ Q E > @ > o o E E D o c n E > 0 L 3 W U m U N � o a > w O a E N p N O M C N U N C C ,Op Oco I @ O C -,6O N D N m Ln N U' V a 0,2 O U V N E E m o n d o U m c y N U N C N o m y m y 7 C :E L n w E °i ai li E m a r U 4 c W N@ 5° o 0 @ NE �v On�0 a0 o apE EcC>E� 'y C E E o api �aT�a'o T E 'ao n w W m w �0 �"E c T v E 5 `� x a 3 n m d E N y m c 6 m ¢ m m - c c m `m �-@+ 5 `m E W h ` 0'Q o n .m N J ...o .� n N E o c a w o c p'O N' O a O N N C O E@> D 0 0 @ �. C a) @ @ .0 N U U N n T O N N J t oa- @ m a `m n 'n m d m m w U H Dc o m m m .a w N .o h E �° mE F E o. a> m E Q O m o m "o 15 o a m t a c m y E o o" O E D 12 S' n _ W N O "O N O D IO 4= O pl N E O m (p .O N 9 p O >CO n O .L" UO rn m .c-a'p J a m E E c o m m 5 z _N O N C u— ». m m T C O O O C O O O 6 C d G C C C N > N N N S .O N'C N N N J E J J J E O `o E .o T o m m co E o v n O N¢ G O N'V N T N� NLo Q T NdpC ny. O) O N e` O N O Y ¢ o.2 E � o n o END v E m o T T L c � o N ¢ C N 6 C m w Y > R O E > N O DO J m¢ p C n O p O J m¢ O E v 3 E O 3 v v m O E E w n E _N o d u E o O 0. N K 'o 0— u fn L m .s o a o E o c o N J N O ,LM1, N N N N O 6 O y OI N C O C N N L D N> i N O n K C y N W CO N> C 0p C O O W N N O O N O O V m O 3 O m= n ¢ w c m m m a m n E Y m a N_ E~ O N> o. E o D �2 E jp '9 m '� o m E o D Y Lv E o N N T T N U m N o o. N `m ai o m v a'r o' D �' m m @ a c 3 0. S C D N p E O" N U N O O m rnm o c i o>U o o N w D o w D c a c c N v y d L a r L S o o m 0 o m m o D m o v o m F m m D O M o v > -O E m m m c m c N n w 5 M O v C q .LL LLl SOD N� �.N��O�U ~ n N C d ~ N E '- O N d O J O nE QI N ry D N N O 0 41 O O Z Y E O V U N U C Nn '$ �r N0o ~Ec L2Uc• aLOn N 0 N N 0> _ O_o O20 o a U o m K o o �'N°° 0m 0m r um mC"O' UON _ m w m o E E o u — := d v m a � N c v E m @ o @ o o c @ N C G v C G @ > @ @ C o «c 0 m c c U O O d U E U J > N O O O � U U C 01 O1 E i= o 0 p U U O N N O O @ U ¢ C N O C N � O C O _ O ° O C U O C U O O L w U w U @ C C L O O J - a' C U N yp N U a aP @ o E W y NN C D y m y @ c 0. N N O O � m O N U lu O @ J ry G_ ° n y O y Z J O L O C U m o 0 o 3 L N N a C ry M d N U O n `I O N @ N 9 O C J O E u •N � 'U N N J N N O W N N 3 @ y 0 @ @ :0 �� O N U O N D <E wo z L p� @ L U - :L N N 7 � T a c v o. v n E o. aci m 0 m 0 0 m 0 @ o o p� w @ o o @ o o @ o 0 n c w c c v c c> c c c c m ❑ ❑ � ❑ C Y C O y0. CO C yV. C C O y ,M1T C C O yv. G C p U @ C p V @ C U U @ G U `o E� � U U❑ o U U U❑@ U U U❑ o@ U U U❑ d U U U❑ «L 0 A U C O c O C O c O 3 > C p C O G O C O O m C m C m C m C m C L O C C O O C D C CC O U O O p C D C C C O U O O O C a C C C O V O O p C @ o 2 G 6> O N O@¢> C O O m V_ ry C _p v C W N C N 9 5 c -6c n c Fpp U5 j w 6 0 3 d� 0 3 N N V@� O 3 3 C a > C 6 C "O > C 6 G a > C n N Cc OU > @ �' N C F- O C ❑ @ @ N m p 15 O y O L U X N d a o O W@ U N T O N O O N N i n (O @ O 0 C @ N E O S` U 6 N (O O) U d' C 3 ,5 @ 3 h U @ 7 n C O.N N a N N v N@ C O@ m@ N@ O D @ C T N T C@ a v D "E6 ._ E@ Cn O) N E c@@ v . Z c D o¢ N— o=E 76 a N m m m w o o y E N p@ nC N O O J E@ c 3 T O pp O d N c a m c c o o c -6 O n N pU " o N O 3 lJ n'L a d' o oU N~ d Y `05 N -tea L'� o 10 p= c nm5 o w E z, w @.0"6y0� ANO@NCOyNN« 0.0 C D W S� "C c QNOV nJ NO @ "O - N NEom o LE @m_N 0 w@m z oo z Q yE 0_n zOI 8z Oc E N M m w O w T3 c 'O @ v mT.o wEaaEt'> o❑ ' @mm=mmaM ^L O p 2 0 N N O O 2 O OTLOUD d.VCaC O>`p V�'�NOCN OLy�CO v V O N @ D .00 N E L @ @ L ` N N 41 @ OO O J Q C, _� Ni/Ui U .O 3 U U w V O@ J O E �2 C U L N C Z r N N o !° m c u - :. w `w 16 _T a C N C N C N C N @ o o @ o o @ o o @ o o @ 6 C C N C C N C G N C C d C CY C O y C O Y C O yd. �. C O C@ E U @ G d U @ C V U 0, E n c E n c T E n c U U U O U U U O U U U O U U U O U _c L y O @ @ C O C G C C > V U W � O � N N O O C O1 O1 � '@_ U o� E C G F- ❑ m ❑ u a` yam'@ ❑ J ❑ @ N O p O q N O D O O d N p O O p N O O O p d O V O U V U C U C` U V U C U @ C` i_` C U C ` J J C U V ` C U C W N@ N N U C y C -O d@ C L CE N N C > O O N n U O N O@ 6> O N O O O U@@ d O U@@ UON U@@ O O w O O'V� d > C 6 N 'oC cN >CNCo 'cO -O > C d oN Coco mC dn'oN o n@ c N a N @ a a v w r m c c v N v o p t c o 0o a o a c G6 J N 'C CE N UNm ` N N dN M N@ 'o x0E cC a@ v '@o vO 75 Ld m u n ';� o a m E m v m m> `o c cc w n n cJi Y a� E E c cvi @ n N N Q 2 v S o' o N N rn a @ C .O @ «T. Q o E N O U D• N N O _ N N O i 'O U N O j X@ @ C O �' Nv ui OU Z Tp N O L U` N` CCO U @ 2 F$ @vNO NN 7V o r� U oj .M v U U J O V "O O N D• E C N C N Lam, "' O> N U N 6 O N C O@ C LL (p C O L (n @ 'Ncomc5@ O 2 U O O O co,..- E U .. O.Lavncn O O o O o"-Nof j` of m 'J v c ❑ E @ m � C � vi aEi -o N N � w � � n D J �- m - " v = N ,C ❑ � m Eo � � L w o o T 10 0@ cp y@ m OZ d p o Um Z Nw E - N m- W oU NN N 0 �N v� E 8 E woos!-' y°c2 mED� m>m @'_Ln '3 mo'cLL@yam Q3° m o C m N @ n @ C r C O C O .O u_ O "LC' @ O '✓' N 'O O m.".X NCJJ '_ @ N Ep Ol y'�._'N N N OIO N23 Z Z U s N N n �' @ C 6 5:,5 w U N .L. rL N@ U N @ C n 99 o� U R a m c K W Om W C❑ W v�- .N a Wwa ❑ W m � ❑ W O �] m O E J❑ `w J� E c G � E JJ o E c J � E o E q o f m o E w i U U❑ U S W U U❑ O U U m U U O � U U❑ 3 m o m V C O C O a C O C O C O m 3 a 20 G C C C C - a p C O C C C E C C — o v 0 a F ❑ ❑ o- m ❑ ❑ a` � m c °c c y O N'y N'y O C (Cp C C N O- w N N N N o N o> o N OI � m m K E'y K = > � m K = > � ❑ CJ N - •- N V W E U F O E m o Ea m a o E0m m y u Eny o v •- EED- U0 m EE ry= m m m EE 3 W o c m o c m a m o> w o c O a D '� '.2 c E V m E o E E v v m v m E m tE a YO v O N N N N i N N U m m E F m y N v N J N v .5 N O U aL O `O_L Um' - 'O U L L O N � t .� U L � 2 F 3 m F 3 0 � 3 w I- w m I- a m e rv£ ci 5 v n vi w Y c c ° c Kar Ka K K v d 41 C`J O CJ ° (7 J •- U d U C J D m U E d U N L O U C J N O C i2m m•- o - m0° m E a m E E °' U o ' ot5m 0 o O- z ° O C - y w o j6 m m E S ry L D q 4L, b N jp L_ N ai m S o o n N 'p i c N L ° T E •• E '.:v _m . E o w a E v °' E 3 :'. E¢ °� E °� E o s E D> '.(� z ;iv�J m c i -.I21 C - O m c U _ F N d @ L E m @ a w o @am =m E m yam m 0 E m yam @ O O C oc @ O O C C7FC � wOLL oo � w0a � W0a � wQa = s T C N T c O v �. C c O �• C c O d T C yU. •� o E r y o T E )0o L)Co v U CO' O @ D d U X V U O @> J% M ✓i ry K N K @ @ @ @ o K a o¢ O w O oI O m n y o m e C O m e C O m e C O O O C N N N @ N @ N U Q p O O C C C C G C ¢ N S] C d C 2 C N NN L N C � Q U O ,z. Com. C �• C i n i n >¢ N @ .L• O p.O = N V C N N U N J N O w UO C N 2 j y o2Sp v@ O => O) O N O N O ¢ O n L N t C OI O@ of O C L@ O N Y @@ C LUI N m D �'` C -T• = W E 0) a EL O U ._ OCC>@ L N N �' N U C O J O >. W@ C C L Nw C O@ O N O N E L 41 N O 'O C U v N N N a Y m V O= ~ ._ N Y O O N N O D C E W O J C O O O)C SNm N C NJOv O> N OO �����U VIS 'n L, O. 00- N 01 `� C n O N C C 01 @ N Y N d= U Y Y L O 65 O UN 0 O C C E E N o E N N O = C m E n L? y L L u o w O N W,m O M - y am Q� � O N E'p •_ O O E LY N 'O O E M n C N@ E J oy�m�U Ol IA = O t0 W N I O U U O 3] U j mL 0ao_o �wv �E'~o°� �o�naNmEacioa Z5 L C U a :N U d p - d C J O O N D p a 3 D d 7 p - 3 n p° O .L. O 0 rL U O i N C N N n O O N D @ N N N N 0 O m m e@ v m o s o V Q r N O A @ C v — ;F w n m o v 6 C C ry C C C d C C v C W> _@ o>a E, woa o E c E E c E c E =,O o E t o c T En" c E 0 0 = o m? � o o m? U U U � � ^ o m? U U O � kc @ o O' E a p C C o m a O « ¢ N @ M @ m c c o m c 0 _ o a 0 o76 M J a ¢ N N N N 0 3 o c °c 3 m E E aEi :�� n n u o v o E L— m o m a@ a 'O OULNJ E22 p N E UJ C"O N U U> C y m O N N m @'m Si 0 41 C a a> F-- O W T W N N N m N O N NT@ E N V N N N p Q 't ".S o o m =Ta m m m" a m o .o m E m a o ZL.o. m `o `o. S o y w m" m u o 'c c¢ o aNi 01 m O J'- @. 5@ o mo y y .E `n c E U E o m 's Q M E .mc m` L m 1O m E �' c m 2 c m O N N N N C p N .O p Y t O o� o- @@ @ p L U@ C N@ O N a 'O O N @'C. @ C a. U wco m m m o m y w2 W- Z E m E m m@ `° a> o@ P o_ o o o2 yo ¢ aO v g ... o .p Su¢0 @ N M U N@ V 6o @w 2m O OE =v@ OL Na Na N N waU dc>O?O-' > m L,C -OC 0 0 1 6 U c L C =a "- v v m o Q J E L C G L '> N@ i .O W -0@ y I- C y0 Q C? 0- a d O U N O N m E N U >, L c O E 76 j C N U d a m. -U J E'— N N G N O 7 y N O N y@ a m L E2 O> N U J U N N¢ N d@ J J L@ "O @ a 7 N O a >> W C@pOm Om O @ NCEvr@ y omO >Ua c@pm " O oo co o o mv c > a m o a E mom .N o m s .m w"c o N m `m `o�`o��0@ a N O N C u — w m v m T N L C N E m C N E m o N ¢ c o o c m p c o o'c ¢ N d C> G y > @ C ry C N > @ � w o v w o a o E Ma o m .> v m C O @ O U O p N U i N N O > C o o C a O E U �) S L U N0 O O � v N a @ O m c O w n a.2 > N @ a N No a o 0 m 20 o J a c `o n c `o .o c o E o 0 3o m �. v m >o v m N @ 2 al C N .'". p > C !D m> o j 0 N S _@ @ d E C O d O O �i @ O .O a) a C N ` p` C-> N@ a Z I7 @ O U p@ C J V G> O C (n U L. O L @ 6.p O 0 C J y N F O al a O •O- a n p�L@ a "O N W N O L C O 6 d m U S C O C E m r L c N J O J m E o c. J L o d @ al 5 U> E Q of a p Q 1 N E' N J c N O. ..N. _ -p RI v d m v a =al >, o ao nU` v >ma cNN N,N@O a OL @5@ > U`L O N N 2 J aoO dE = JL Ga rd@ -O v Q - j0 c y 5 p m E v h m a m m E v— @ -p w o= a c 'o v n a c J o w ai — 2 v m t Z C U a N U p @ m N N C a) U N@ N N U R.W O) > O@@ a) @ U OU a) N N U "a¢> U C al C N C C N C a C@ U C N-~ N .O N a) a) al J> a N iA > N LL. a- O' ~ L. Cd' d v N @ d O] ¢ CO C O ¢ L O j tG a O C> N al ¢ O pp @ m@ N CO N O a p 0 a@` �' m E > a O` @ N O @_ T C C -O aJ @ p n CO a) d 0 O J d Co LQ L91QC NQNNS `L".p ON'O- ¢N370 a iEO OOaNE 0. z O C O O) d O O F- C N L a N O C a>N- N L N r U N ✓i E 6 L N N U O a -O N¢ N C d a) 0• N a) U '`s @ o- a_ d > v y N rn m N `1 0 o a v c O@ v= o o J L > a c N rn J 2 Q o O 0 o v o :7 U ,� U£ ¢ 0 0 O_ N o 2 U v @� 3 >> d 5 N N .0 m E o U' n a 60 c v a m y .. m w o rn m a:5 U v a 2U `o a F G - m O m w N m T — n C @ C c w n m E m a mC ' m w p d w p d C C J C m r U J J E C 0 o E o o E r o o ?' o m o ?' o ^z .> CJUUO U ani UUP❑ � m o w Q � a m u m c O O j U L Y E > N a) C C _ F LL m a m o 0 D OW c — U U N L 2 C m 6 O J c c U C U p v _ C O OL m a U m w a > N o m m a ^� Q c n o E E o n m m C m c m c m i)O 'N NN'nNT� =m�vwoJN�N�LN O._N .L. m—O DG jpN3 C d d' w` O Y c a1 M N 0 v O a) Y m C 0> E O n O m Cm 'o NN L aI O@ N 7@ Lc N> L0 C3 CNO _d O C I N Npm dC N _ DC C ) v E m V E mO UCO L E o '-0c-o m e �✓, o a> pm 5N w0m @ q U E m N@ O a) U N n L N h N N CL .L. m m D) ¢ L` •= o. v o 5 m r o E o m s m o '`m �' N c 3 v= a O m m w O N D o v m `V° t m> m ¢ E n v a m m w m E u D E �n d w a d E ' o m w o v cl h m cc d o w W p m r .D o 3 o w m'E m V m v E a m 0 E o m �0 �� b o o m m p m Lm, 0 3 p c O a i� m `c° D a m m N D o N o' o cp.� w oo T N N O m p T N O �, m n O 'n �p ` c o Q L O O O ' m~ m > U U OIL m al U L4 O@ `o2Ew@> m O @@ a) a) a ry (n O> a) N L "' 0" a � U(7 T On � � S U C O .o CEp OI T@ N> O O Emma>UL..00 m ��3�NCwL. �M@E mm� njNov `m NVO m oi: ou '65 m�EEvm�wpmrn-�cm Aoani �.��mD ai`°E?�m �$T o n m c m E m w w o a 0 aci o `o_ m w m m -o m n 3 a E o m N o E n m m o v m c m d v n o n d Gi N O @ C u — r= m m � O T O N G > C C a n o N m o o N m 0 0'c N Q m o o c a D C> C G d C K N N N N wom Woa Woa C Y C N C Y r c E J o E r `o E a o E 'Ec o ' �.E n> �cio Gcioo 0c�oo m `c m c c y @ C G N A L 0 o D o o o c m O � � m V O U V U O N n O N O N 16 C N C 6 E > > O O cc = = U O o cc C U O 0 o i N.- U C w D L N N 0 _ fb a Q a N N N C @ N'j5 L 'N o D E@ o 0,2 a O C a) m L N @ '.c C o m@ N N 0 v� 0 `p ✓Ui C N �- - Sm om E n C o m0�0 oZN0 v mNC N coi o oUm SrySJN 0 0 N`m nm cm3o0 m 0` 'CN>> mC°''�o 00 o > U J - OCUt 22 T_ E .: N 0 0 N 0 "O 16 0 16 `off �a O 6E @o OfN oJ@N > o aNEp O r OO NN L O U N vW d O N y 0 L Q N O@ o.Da o oNONl N mO NN ONLN02 U O N WCW gip@ Ua>I6c OO NU-M E ¢ N N E@ L_ 'o aoi m@ o 2 "O L o o O O@ C U N J V E O N N pJ N L C N N O 0 N L VJi N _N O m C U — w N d @ CC T O N O N u+ E E N C N N O 3 N N y w N C O m E N p `m q � � E o � o m a E UUo ) uOo m a E � 0 0 0 - U 2 2 3 i C p C O O O C O C 0 C o m m A n n N 0 O N C O N C O mo U U O w m a v n m O D O N N _ p Q p C O x C C v D m o c > c >' o o D p a a N pUU D O C 'Y pl > n N p= m N o a g °" m m '� � w o• o- m w D r. S o E'o 2 3>w'T So C.c p O N w So 2 N M N d U d p E J O E N N VI N N N o E d N 3 N m m N dd1°� ooom o o O C t D N O) c N o'E, m Q c 3 a X'lp' d U Q om; N ?, y N N N N N p O O U� d dj U N N D N (n d N a a m o °� E D v v o❑ m o c— m m E 0 o m p 6-6 2i O 6:S .0 E 2 a m ry m a� o p m 2 a z a z° Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 1.0 Introduction This document is the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Terracina Specific Plan Project (SCH 112013091083). This MMRP has been prepared pursuant to Section 21081.6 of the California Public Resources Code, which requires public agencies to "adopt a reporting and monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment." An MMRP is required for the proposed project because the 1S/MND has identified mitigation measures to reduce potentially significant impacts. 2.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program As the lead agency, the City of Lake Elsinore will be responsible for monitoring compliance with all mitigation measures. Different departments within the City are responsible for aspects of the project. The MMRP identifies the department with the responsibility for ensuring the measure is completed; however, it is expected that one or more departments will coordinate efforts to ensure compliance. The MMRP is presented in tabular form on the following pages. The components of the MMRP are described briefly below: • Mitigation Measure: The mitigation measures are taken from the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), in the same order that they appear in the IS/MND. • Method of Verification: Identifies the method that will be used to confirm that each mitigation measure has been implemented. • Timing of Verification: Identifies at which stage of the project the mitigation must be completed. The term construction includes (but is not limited to) site preparation, vegetation clearing, grading, excavation, and building activities. • Monitoring Responsibility: Identifies the department within the City with responsibility for mitigation monitoring. • Verification (Date and Initials): Provides a contact who reviewed the mitigation measure and the date the measure was determined complete. Iorranine Specific Plan Protect ESA 1130294 Mitigation Monilon, and Reporting Program November 2014 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Prepared for City of Lake Elsinore November 2014 to Comments 4-3 The comment is noted. Please see response to comment 4-2. 4-4 The comment is noted. Please see response to comment 4-2. 4-5 The comment is noted. Please see response to comment 4-2. Comment Letter 5 - Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians 5-1 The comment is noted. Comment Letter 6 — California State Clearinghouse 6-1 The letter from the State Clearinghouse is noted. Tcuapnc Specific. Plan Pmjecl 4 ESA 1130224 Pinel IS/MND Response W Camm... o Novemn0er 2014 responsibilities and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites and human remains discovered on the site. The archaeological monitor and dte ap ro. nate Tribe will evaluate the si gni, ficance of a archaeological resources discovered oil the property. Tribal and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all gradin" excavation and groundbreaking activities and shall also have the autlrorilu to stop and redirect rg "ding activities. (*It is anticipated that the Pechanga Tribe will be the "appropriate" Tribe due to prior and extensive coordination with the City in determining potentially significant impacts and appropriate mitigation measures and its demonstrated cultural affiliation with the project area.)" 3-10 It is noted that no changes are proposed to Mitigation Measures CUL -4 through CUL -7. 3-11 The following language has been added as Mitigation Measure CUL -3A to address controlled grading, in response to comments 3-11 and 4-2: "Prior to any gradin" at or near the vicinity of the known surface boundaries of CA-RIV-5782 and CA-RIV-5783, the developer shall meet and. confer with the appropriate Tribe and the project archaeoloOst to develop an _appropriate controlled grading plan The prose of dre controlled gradin" at and around the site is br afford the opportunity to determine whether anv subsurface resources are associated with the sites and if so to collect the resources for appropriate mitigation as outlined in Treatment Agreement. All controlled grading shall be monitored -in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement required in CUL -3." 3-12 This comment is noted. Comment Letter 4 - Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians 4-1 The comment from the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians is noted. 4-2 Tile lead agency acknowledges that the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians consider Lake Elsinore to be an area of high sensitive to the people of Soboba, as does the Pechanga Tribe as detailed in their comment letter dated November 17, 2014; however, all things considered, it is believed that the mitigation measure, as written, affords adequate protection to this culturally sensitive area. Also, see response to comment 3-11 regarding controlled grading, for which Mitigation Measure CIJL-3A has been added. 1 gilkl $pOck PI' Poyud 3 FSA I1JW)4 R,4 ISII0N012osponse (a CanlmeNs NovenNor 20'14 to Comments 24, 2013 flying adjacent to the project site during biological surveys. Based on the time of year of the detection and the behavior (flying ability and independence), it is highly unlikely that the bird observed was a first-year juvenile. Rather, the bird was likely a second or third -year eagle moving through the area. Regardless, the golden eagle is a covered species under the MSIICP, with a total of over 164,000 acres of suitable foraging and nesting habitat being conserved under the plan. Being that the project site does not occur within a MSHCP Criteria Area, and that no suitable nesting habitat occurs within or adjacent to the site, no mitigation is required. 3-5 This comment provides a summary of comments for which specific responses are provided below. Regarding biological resources see responses to comments 3-2 through 3-4 above. 3-6 This comment provides a summary of comments for which specific responses are provided below. The responses below discuss revisions to mitigation in the Final IS/MND. 3-7 Mitigation Measure CUL -1 has been revised as follows in response to this comment: "All earth moving activities within the project area during construction shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist selected from the latest Riverside County Cultural Resources Consultant List." 3-8 Mitigation Measure CUL -2 has been revised as follows in response this comment: "If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are discovered during grading, the developer, the project archaeologist, and the appropriate tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. If the developer and the Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Community Development Director (CDD) for decision. The CDD shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the appropriate tribe." 3-9 Mitigation Measure CUL -3 has been revised as follows in response to this comment: "At least 30 days prior to seeking a grading permit, the project applicant shall contact the appropriate Native American Tribal Representative (Representative)* to notify the Representative of the initiation of the grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Lake Elsinore and the Representative to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the Tufrauna Spelt Plan Pfaled 2 ISA1130294 rinnl 1MOND Reeyutue to Gonlmonts Nwo t,e, 2014 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Comment Letter 1 — Western Municipal Water District 1-1 The letter from Western Municipal Water District stating that it has no comments is acknowledged. Comment Letter 2 — Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 2-1 The letter from the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is noted and a copy has been provided to the Project Applicant. The project is not in a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain. The permit requirements discussed within the letter are consistent with the discussion of permits in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). Comment Letter 3 — Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians 3-1 The comment from the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians is noted. This comment provides a summary of comments for which specific responses are provided below. 3-2 Non-native grassland habitat and ruderal areas present at the site constitute moderate quality raptor foraging habitat. While the majority of these areas will be impacted by the proposed project, sufficient coverage for multiple raptor species is afforded under the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSIICP), including those species that either occur w have the potential to occur on the site (Cooper's hawk, ferruginous hawk, golden eagle, and northern harrier). As a result, the project's proposed impacts to raptor foraging habitat would be considered less than significant, and therefore no mitigation is required. 3-3 The coastal California guatcatcher is a covered species under the MSHCP, with a total of over 77,000 acres of suitable Riversidean sage scrub habitat being conserved under the plan. Being that the coastal California gnatcatcher is a covered species, and that the project site does not occur within a MSIICP Criteria Area, no mitigation is required for the loss of suitable Riversidean sage scrub habitat associated with the project:. 3-4 An immature golden eagle (white markings on wings and tail) was observed on April Toimcina SpoaOc Vt", Pmlact 1 CSA / 130284 Final IWNIND Ra,,,111 lu Gommenls November 2014 Document Details Report State Clearinghouse Data Base SCH# 2013091083 Project Title Terracina Specific Plan Project (SP 2012-01, GPA 2012-03, ZC 2012-05, VTI'Map 36557, and VTTM Lead Agency 36577) Lake Elsinore, City of Type MND Mitigated Negative Declaration Description The Tenaona Specific Plan Project consists of a residential development with approximately 76.5 awes of residential, 22 acres of open space, 22.5 acres of roadways, 1.6 acres of park, and 28.2 acres of graded slopes and basins. The Specific Plan has proposed two housing options. The IS analyzes the higher density option of 499 residential units (448 single-family detached units and 51 multi -family attached units) while the currently proposed Tentative Tract Map shows the lower density option of 46B units. The project requires approvals from the City including rezoning from Single -Family Residential to Specific Plan, approval of a tentative tract map, and construction/development permits. Lead Agency Contact Name Richard J. Macl felt Agency City of Lake Elsinore Phone (951)674-3124 x209 Fax email Address 130 S. Main Street City Lake Elsinore State CA Zip 92530 Project Location County Riverside City Lake Elsinore Region Lat/Long 33'41'49"N/ 117'22'30"W Cross Streets Lakeshore Drive and Terra Cotta Road Parcel No. 378-040-(004 to 007, 012), 389-180-(001 - 002), 389-190-002 Township 5S Range 6W - Section 26/34 Base SBB&M Proximity to: Highways Airports Railways Waterways Schools SR -74,1-15 Lake Elsinore USD Land Use Open Space / Single -Family Residential (R-1) / Low Density Residential and Low -Medium Residential Project issues Agricultural Land; Air Quality; Archaeologic -Historic; Biological Resources; Drainage/Absorption; Flood Plain/Flooding; Forest Land/Fire Hazard; Geologic/Selsmic; Minerals; Noise; Population/Housing Balance; Public Services; Recreation/Parks; Schools/universities; Sewer Capacity; Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading; Solid Waste; Toxic/Hazardous; Traffic/Circulation; Vegetation; Water Supply; Wetland/Riparian; Water Quality; Growth Inducing; Landuse; Cumulative Effeclsl AesthetictVisual Reviewing Resources Agency; Department of Fish and Wildlife, Region 6; Office of Historic Praseivatlon; Agencies Department of Pants and Recreation; Department of Water Resources; Cal Fire; Calhans, Dlshict 8; Department of Housing and Community Development; Air ReSOL WCOS Board; Rogional Water Quality Control Board, Region 8; Native American Heritage Commission Date Received 10/15/2014 Startof Review 10/16/2014 Endof Review 11/13/2014 STATE OF CALIFORNIA C( Governor's Office, of Planning and. Research State Clearinghouso and Planning 'Unit; Edmund G. Brown Ir. Govcrnm November 14, 2014 Richard J. Macliott City of Lalce Elsinore 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Comment Letter 6 0? PLO, y NN c� $ * o sr�renn rnufoa�� Ken Alm Director Subject: Terracina Specific Plan Project (SP 2012-01, GPA 2012-03, ZC 2012-05, VTI'Map 36557, and VTTM 36577) SCI -I#: 2013091083 Dear Richard J. Mael-Ioa: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Mitigated Negative Declaration fo selected state agencies for review. The review period closed on November 13, 2014, and no state ageucies submitted comments by that dale, Tlus letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review rcquirenrents for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California &rviromnental Quality 6-1 Act. Please call the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. If you have a question about the above-named project, please refer to Are Len -digit State Clearinghouse number when contacting this office. Sincerely, ScotK�'gan ��. Director, State Clearinghouse C'I T Y CSI PI_ANNj'NG DIVISION 1400 TbJNTI15'CRP,ItT P.O. 130% 3044 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 96812-9049 'PIN, (3 1(i) 4d5-0613 b'Ax (91(;) 323-3013 mvAv.onY.ea.aov RINCON LAND OF LUISENO INDIANS Culture Committee -- ----------- I W Iiibtl Road Vrlley t entei. Califoinia 92032 (760) 297..2621 of (760;) 297-2622 & I'ux:000) 749-5901 October 20, 2014 Richard MacHott City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main Street. Lake Elsinore, CA 92.530 Re: Terracinar Specific Plan Project No. 2012-02 Dear Mr. MacFlott: Comment Letter 5 'thank you for inviting its to submit eonimcnis on the Terracina Specific Plan Project No, 2012-02. This letter is written on behalf of the Rincon Band of Luiserio Indians. Rincon is submitting these comments concerning your projects potential impact on LuiseAct cultural resources. The Rincon Band has concerns for impacts to historic and cultural resources and the finding of items of' 5_1 significant cultural value that could be disturbed or destroyed and are considered culturally significant to the Luise7o people. This is to inform you, your identified location is within the Aboriginal "Territory of the Luisetho people, but is not within Rincon's historic boundaries. We defer you to the Pechanga Band of Luiserfio Indians or Soboba Band ofLuisetio Indians who ere closer to your project area Please contact the Native American Heritage Commission and they will assist with a referral to other tribes in One project area. Thank you for the opportunity to protect and preserve our cultural assets. Sincerely, Rc e Duro Rincon Culture COmmittCC Chairman RECEIVED CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING DIVISIO111 lio Mazzotti Stephanie spencer Steve Stallings Lam is f;. Gonzalez Prank Mazzelti III "CnbN UhainnroI viae Chainvommi Councit Mmk:' Comm] Member Council MumbOr Comment Letter 4 We request that both Soboba Band of L uiseho Indians and the Pechanga Tribe be allowed to monitor the project area during the ground -disturbing activities. ']'his shall be conducted either simultaneously, or on a one week on, one week off rotating schedule. The Soboba Band is requesting that a Treatment and Dispositions Agreement(s) between the developer and both the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians and the Pechanga Tribe be provided to the City of Lake Elsinore prior to the issuance of a grading permit and before conducting any additional archaeological fieldwork. The Soboba Band requests a language change in all texts that state, "tile appropriate Tribe/appropriate Native American Representative" to "the Soboba Band of Luiseflo Indians and the Pechanga Tribe" or vice versa, Mitigation Measure CUL -4 • Mitigation Measure CUL -4 states "The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are Found on the project arca to the appropriate tribe for proper treaunent.and disposition." In this section the Soboba Band requests a language change fi,om "the appropriate tribe" to "the consulting tribes". The Soboba Band of Luisen"o Indians is requesting a lace -to -lace meeting between the City of Lake Elsinore and the Soboba Cultural Resource Department. Please contact me at your earliest convenience either by email or phone in order to make arrangements. Sincerely, L D Joseph Ontiveros, Director of Culturat Resources Soboba Band of Luiscillo Indians P.O. Box 487 San Jacinto, CA 92581 Phone(951)654-5544 ext, 4137 Cell (951) 063-5279 jgntivcros(v y)) )boba_nsn. Soboba Band of Luischo Indians Page 3 M, 4-5 Comment Letter 4 Mitigation Measure CUL -2 Mitigation Measure CUL -2 states, "If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are discovered during the grading, the developer, the project archaeologist, and the appropriate tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation Por such resources. If the developer anti the Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the [CDD] for decision. The CDD shall make the determination based on the provisions of the [Cl --'QA] with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the appropriate tribe." The project archaeologist and the tribes shall determine significance of the Native American cultural resources that may be found it) the project area. These specifics regarding treatment and disposition of cultural items shall be detailed out ahead of time in the establish Treatment and Dispositions Agreement that will be in place between the tribes and the developer. The Soboba Band requests a language change from "the appropriate tribe" to "the Soboba Band ot'Luiseno Indians and Pechanga Tribe". Mitigation Measure CUL -3 Mitigation Measure CUL -3 states, "At least 30 days prior to seeking a grading permit, the project applicant shall contact the appropriate Native American Representative (Representative)* to notify the Representative of the initiation of the grading, excavation and monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Lake Elsinore and the Representative to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address .... (*It is anticipated that the Pechanga Tribe will be the appropriate Tribe due to prior turd extensive coordination with the City in determining potentially significant impacts and appropriate ,mitigation measures and its demonstrated affiliation with the project area) The Soboba Band requests a language change from "the project applicant shall contact the appropriate Native American Representative" to "the project applicant shall contact both tite Soboba Band of Luischo Indians and Pechanga Tribe". Please remove the implication that the appropriate Tribe (Representative)* will be the Pechanga Tribe. The Lake Elsinore region is a traditional use area for both the Soboba Band and the Pechanga Tribe. `Ihis is a shared use area that was occupied by the Ln1SC110 people, rather than one specific tribe, and the cultural significance that we tic to the land is highly regarded by both bands of Luiserio people. Soboba Rand of Luiscno Indians Page 2 43 �c November 17, 2014 rJ Attn: Richard Mael-lo((, LFED Green Associate t' Community Development Department -Planning Division City of Lakc Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Fisinore, CA 92530 Comment Letter 4 _y>> �)l I I1/l�y,. I,I ItINt 11),188r Re: Notice of Availability of recirculated Initial Study and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) unit Related General Plan Amendment No. 2013-03, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 36557 The project arca falls within the bounds our Luiscno Traditional Use Arca. The Lake Fisinore area is part of a shared use arca that was occupied and used in ongoing trade between the Luiselio Muds, not considered as a location occupied by one existing band, hilt rather the Luiscno Tribe, and is regarded as highly sensitive to the people of Soboba. The proposed project is in close proximity to known sites, including two village sites which are known to the Luiscno in their traditional names Pa'Axchcy and Wee'va. The project area itself once contained previously recorded cultural sites consisting of bedrock milling features, a portable metatc fragment, manes or grinding stones, several hammer stones, a core fragment, and lithic flakes. Other sites such as these have also been recorded within the one -mile radius of the project area, as well. The tribe believes that there is a possibility of ercourtering buried cultural deposits during the ground - disturbing activities associated with the proposed development. The Soboba Band of Luiscno Indians has reviewed the Recirculated Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration dated Octobca 2014 and has drafted the comments below accordingly. Soboba Band of Luiscno htdians is requesting the following: Environmental Checklist 5. Cultural Resources Discussion (a, b) Mitigation Measure CUL -1 • Mitigation Measure CUL -1 statues, "All coulb moving activities within the project area during construction shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist." In addition to a qualified archaeologist, the Soboba Band is requesting that Native American representatives from both the Soboba Band and the Pechauga Tribe also be on site to monitor all of the earth moving activities for the proposed project. Controlled grading must be incorporated into the Mitigation Measures. It is imperative that conditions are established into the mitigation measures for the project that will require controlled grading in the sensitive arefls. Soboba Blnui of Luiseno Indians Page 1 41 EWA Comment Letter 3 Pcchanga Comment I Ott cIto the C'ily of ILnkc I:Isiuorc Re: Pcchanga Tribe Corn III enIS un TOO Iacinu SP November 17, 2014 logo 5 Mitigation Measure CUI,-7: If human remains are OaCOnntl'red. California Idcalilt and Safety Code. Seed on 7050.5 states I M no further disturbance shall occur until lite Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 509298(b) remains shall be left in place and free from dishubauce until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Rivcrsido County Coroner determines the remains to 3.10 be Native American, the coroner shall contact the Native American 1101-hage Commission within 24 hours. Subsequently, the Native American 1Icritage Commission shill identify the person or persons it believes to be the "most likely descendant" The most likely descendant may then make recommendations. and engage in consultations concerning the treatment ol'the remains as provided in Public Resources All 509298. Mitkation Measure Cl1L-8: Prior to anrtgrading at or near the vicinity ofthe known surface boundaries of CA -RI V-5782 all(], CA-1t[V-5783 the llevelouer shall meet and confer with the J?prowiate 'Tribe and., the Project archaeologist to devek)p an a tropriate wwwolled griidiva�lan, 'the nurnose, of the controlled t�rading_a- am 3.1 .� Around the_ site is to afford the oft}[unity w detente whether any subsurface resources are associated with the sites and -if -so, to collect the resources for appao mitt ag tion as determine iu the provisions outlined in the 'li�eatnteitt Agreement All controlled gradin shall be monitored according to thejnoVisions If the Aereement rsnuired in CUL -3, The Pcchanga Tribe looks forward w continuing to well< together with the City of Lake Elsinore in protecting the invaklabie Pechnnga sultura�tl resources bund in the Project area. 3_12 Please contact me at 951-770-8104 or at aboovei(7pecbanga-nsn.gov once you have had a chance to review these connnents so we can address the biological concerns and any potential cultural mitigation language questions. Thank you. Sincerely, Anna I loover Cultural Analyst Ce Pechanga Office of Be General Counsel Kelsey Stricker, Duvetor, Pcchanga I3nvironmental Department heel rngn Cults! Resources • 7umewdu Braid of Lw) ... io 11400ion Indam., i 1°naa 00iae Bur 218.E • '1lonecnln. ('A 92.592 1 Snored 1, 7'he Dull' 1) lolva Uulo ow Care And A^rdr 11onmIN, Ill"', to The N"(0 Comment Letter 3 Pechenga Comment Let ei to Ibe City of Lnlm Iilsinore Re: Pochanga 'tribe Comments on Telneina SP November 17, 2014 Page 4 approval be incoiporate•.d into the final IS/MND and any other final environmental documents approved by the City. Mitigation Measure CUL -1: All earth moving activities within the project arca during construction shall be monitored by a J2i•vprside-(:Doul ouali'Plcd archaeologist. A4itigation Measure CUL -2: If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are discovered during grading, the developer, die project archaeologist, and the appropriale tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to Calif.,. Pub. Res Code 21083 2 b avoidance is the ncfcrred method of xcservatiwl for u_chaeolo cal wsouuc9,�_1'f the developer and the I iibc cannot agree on the significance of the mitigation for such resources tlacaeissues will be presented to the Community Development Director (CDD) for decision. The CDD shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the appropriate tribe. Mitigation Measure CUL -3: At least 30 days prior to seeking a grading permit, the project applicant shall contactthe appropriate Native American Tribal Representative (Representative)* to notify tine Representative of the initiation of the grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of bake I�lsinore and the Representative to develop a Cultural Resources 'I•reauneat and Monitoring Agreement. 'fhe Agreement shall address the responsibilities and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites and humin remains discovered mi the site. ;I,:de ar_chacologrcal monitor and the ay>propriate'I7ibe._will_evaluate the significance of ani archaeoto]_i'esow_ces di.scowied on the ptonerty.:]irbal and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading. cxcav�tion and omtdhrcarkin , activities and shall also have (lie ae0orit ty o stop. am, redirect railing aghvities. ("It is anticipated Haat the Peehanga Tribe will be the "appropriate" "tribe due to prior and extensive coordination with the City in determining potentially significant impacts and appropriate mitigation measures and its demonstrated cultural affiliation with the project area.) 3-6 13-7 IM 3-9 Mitigation Measure CUL -4: The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are 3-10 found on the project area to the appropriate tribe for proper treatment and disposition. No comments on palconto logical mitigation mctsures CUL -5 & 6 Pae/rno2a Gdtural Resoroc(a • 7emeatrin Band of f leseno lldnsion Indians Posr QQme Box 1181 • lwneaula, CR 92.592 Sacred Jr !'de Dufv ]roared (into Our Care Rud bhidr Iffinor 147a Rasa To The Need Comment Letter 3 Pechanga Common( Loner to Ihc City of Lake Illsmone Re: Pechanga Tribe Conuncnts on'I orracina SP November 17, 2014 Page 3 would be deu'innental to the Guatcatcher. The provided mitigation is not udequate for sufficient 3-3 protection. Finally, the "bribe is concerned that the Golden 1?aglc that was observed off-site will not have adequate mitigation to protect its habitat and nesting areas. Most guidance on Golden hagles indicate that there is a 5 -anile radius around nests and, its this bird was n juvenile, thn 3-4 Project site should not be discounted as habitat for this species, This species should be specifically addressed in the IS/MND. IIE'QUESTED TRIBAL INVOLVEMENTAND MITIGATION The Pechanga I3and is not opposed to this Project; however, we are opposed to ally direct, indirect and cumulative impacts this Project may have to tribal cultural resources. The "Tribe's primary concerns stent from the Project's proposed impacts on Native Amerioau cultural resources, 7'he Tribe is concerned about both the protection of unique and irreplaceable cultural resources, such as Luiseno village sites, sacred sites and archaeological items which would be displaced by ground disturbing work on the Project, and oil the proper and lawful treatment of cultural items, Native American human remains turd sacred items likely to be discovered in the course of the work. The proposed Project is located in a highly sensitive region of Luiseno territory -- a Traditional C'uhural Property, and the Tribe believers that the possibility for recovering subsurface resources during ground -disturbing activities is high. The "Tribe has over thirty-five (35) years of experience in working with various types of construction projects throughout its territory. The combination of this knowledge and experience, along with the knowledge of the culturally -sensitive areas and oral tradition, is what the 'Tribe relles on to make fairly accurate predictions regarding the likelihood of subsurface resources in a particular location. Based upon the information provided to the Tribe, there are two known cultural resources and several biological resources that will be impacted by the proposed project. The 'tribe requests that our biological concerns be addressed prior to the document going to public hearing and if appropriate, additional mitigation should be included to protect the sensitive species discussed above. We would like to discuss this further with the City. Further, tine Tribe is concerned that the two cultural sites nnay still have surflaee manifestations, based on the IS/MND: "A Phase 11 investigation was conducted for cultural resource RIV-5783... new finds included ... [however] No definitive indications of'a subsurface deposit were observed but such a deposit may exist on the project site." Due to this confusing language and the archaeologist's icconutnendation that there is the potential lbr identifying cultural resources during grading, the Tribe reconunnends mitigation measure CUL -8 be included in the final document. All Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures, with a few requested additions, are included below fill, reference. We request that these measures/conditions of Pechmgn C1,111"al Rea'nmres • lemeada [land a/Luiseno Hni/oll lndlans Pn.vl Ojfne 13ar 2183 - Temecula, C'a 92592 .Sacred Is [he I)wv D'aw-d Unto Orn Cruz And 419th Hnnnr We Rise-' P) 111e iVeed 3-5 3-6 Comment Letter 3 Pechanga CoIII ale nt fetter to rho City oI' I..d<e 1 Re: Pechanga Tribe Commenls on 'Tcrracina SP November 17,20111 Pagc 2 Ftuther, the Tijbc also has concerns regarding the biological section of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). 'Thew; arc outlined below as well. TIe State and Federal governments have mandated that cultural resources, which include biological and natural resources as well, trust be appropriately mitigated for within the confines of developtuent projects. The Tribe appreciates the active role the City takes to maintain the significant history and natural resources of thc'I"ribe and California. PTCHANGA CULTURAL AFFILIATION TO PROJECT AREA The Pechanga Tribe asserts that the Proicet area is part of L,uisefto, and therefore the Tribe's, aboriginal territory as evidenced by the existence of Luiserlo place names, bola yrxclval (rock art, pictographs, petioglyphs), traditional landscapes, cultural areas and an extensive Luiscrio artifact record in the vicinity of the Project. "This culturally sensitive area is affiliated with the Pechanga Band of Luiseiio Indians because of the Tribe's cultural ties to this area as well as the close proximity of the Project to the `Tribal reservation lands. The Pechanga 'Tribe, has a specific legal and cultural interest in this Project as the'Tribe is culturally affiliated with the geographic area that comprises the Project property and is the closest affiliated tribe to We Property. The Tribe has been ranted the Most Likely Descendent (Cal. Pub. Res. C. §5097.98) on Projects in the nearby vicinity of the proposed Project and has specific knowledge of cultural resources and sacred places near the proposed Project which we have shared with the City of previous occasions on this and other projects. The Tribe welcomes the opportunity to beet with the City to further explain and provide documentation concerning our specific cultural affiliation to lands within your jurisdiction, if so desired. BIOLOGICAL CONCERNS Ilse 'Tribe's Environmental Department has received and reviewed the IS/MND for the Project. There are three primary concerns. First, the IS/MND states that direct impacts to raptor foraging habitat (typically grasslands and open areas) will occur. It further states that. 17.69 acres onsite preservation of Riversidian Sage Scrub habitat (RSS) will occur as "litigation for destruction of raptor habitat. While preservation of the RSS habitat is desirable in general and the, Tribe approves of the preseivation, this seems counterproductive as RSS is not a favored raptor foraging habitat. "Thus, the habitat being preserved will not appropriately benefit raptor. Furthermore, the consl'uction of residential units will increase the disturbance to raptors and reduce the desirability of the preserved acreage for foraging, thus making preservation of RSS specifically for raptor's an ineffective mitigation. 3-1 3-2 Secondly, there is concern that the mitigation as presumed under the MSI -ICP is adequate j to protect the California Gnatcatcher located on the Project. 'Ilse Tribe is concerned that the 3-3 MSI -ICP has not adequately protected enough of the required Coastal Sage Scrub habitat which Pechanga t: rdbual Resourer• 7i,,m ula Bandofbayenu Mission Adrrun Post Office Bo,a 2183 • )rmc,il/a Cd 92592 S'orrcd Ls 76ra Dnp 7rus(ed Uum Our Caw,4u0 111A Hon,We Rise 7o The Need VIA N-N1A(L and USPS Mr. Richard Mael lott Planning, Manager City of bake Hsinorc 130 Strath Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 925:30 i'B(IIAIICrA CCILTL W, RrSOURChS '( "n", Ida Nand of l.++ison') Alissinu h,liurts I --t (a i, ilos?h3, lbu.....I, t;A 9j19l "IFirpimnu (911120KA293 - Iva IOb o 4p&9-001 November 17, 2014 Comment Letter 3 I hom� VI:uy scar 41ape. bndrne M.I I., I "mn.nncee 91<wHa.: IL idceu 6ur.eliu Mvr,u Ri,lnnJ B. �.raac, III Uim: un t 6v,r Dulinir Cunr Jin:oov 1'nul mecum PLmn.. P, SPonnlu, r,d.., a1,.„ r,,,W I In IW, ,I A.,d\4( Re: Pechanga 'Tribe Conunonts on the Recirculated Initial Slauly/Mitigated Negative Declaration far the Ill-twebta Spedhe Plan, SP 2012-01, General Plan An)cudrnmd 2012-13, 'Lone Change 2012-05, VTTM 36557 and V'TTM 36577 Dear Mr. Macl lou: This comment letter is written on behalf" of the Pechanga Band of l.adsciRo Indians (hereinafter. "tile 'I'ribe"), a federally recognized Indian tribe and sovereign government. The 1'ribc Iormally requests, pursuant to 11111) lie Resources (.axle §2109.1 to be notified and involved in the entire Cf.QA environmental, review process Ir the Makin of the above referenced project (tile "Project"), If you have no done so alrcatly, please add the Tribe to your distribution list(s) for public notices and Cil'eltlintit)n of all docun)ents, including environmental review documents, archaeological reports, and all documcros pertaining to this Project. 1'he Ole fllfM requests to be directly notified of all public Incarings and scheduled approvals etnwerning this Project. Please also incorporate these comnnents into the record of approval for this Project. The 'Tribe thanks the City of Lake Iilsinore for providing for both archaeological and Pechanga 'I'ribal monitoring language in the mitigation nncasures of the document. Although the docunnent states that the Project area has been disturbed, the Tribe is concerned that the two sites idcntilied )within the boundaries (CA-RIV-5782 and CA -MV -5783) could potentially lave Surface rcmtins associated with then) that have not been recorded. Thus, the "11'ibe rceonanends ona additional mitigation nmasu v to conduct a pic-grade surface walkover, prior to mobilivation of brushing and grubbing, to address it controlled grading procedure that would assist with identilicauon ofally additional resources. The proposed language is below. S'nrrud Is The Am, 1)u.s/ed 11wo Om ( aw And Wall llounlMie Mse M A, Need 3-1 WARRRN D. Nell a_IAhIN Ui.m rl Mill upcf t lues Eu"Irl"i i. k � 1sa RIVIiVSIDF COIJN"I'Y H OODCON'I IMI. AND WAl'FR i, ONSFRVA'f`iON DISTRICT (.'i1V Uf fate I,ilsinoic 1:;6 Soulh Main Street Lake Llsioore, CA 9'530 Mluuuon: Rlchaufd Machult __.. _..... Comment Letter 2 1915 NIAfit, 1.1 tilIt) 'I'.I. It IVP RSI DI. i'.AQ"Oi oSl �a5,`.I'alll AYiiiI 'I N9164• , reec1cil„n.Im”, I to M0 Ladies and Gentlemen: Rc: '1 mo 36557,'I rjcl 36577 & ('1 2012-05 _ I he District docs not nor many rcoannicnd cwiditioov for land lienitis nr other land use ca -es ai inunrpw gall eilice. The Di'trfcl also docs not Iilan aback city land use c esus oI provide Stale Division of Real Instate Icttcrs lir other flood l ueard report+ lite such cases, Dist lcl connua.nls(I vconnnendatu>ns fOr Suess e. lsee are [to] Baily limned to ilelnn of specific futures( t0 the Disha.l Including DKhiel Mostef DI mnagc Plan iaeiliues, oihe.f tegfumal flood control and dlaulagc I unities which could 6e considorei a logical cool,wnenl or extension of if masa plan system, will Dist9cl Area Draaage plan fee: (development mitigation (este) hr la�drmn, Olornultloh of a goof al a taro is pf ovided. I he Districthas list( reviewed (Ile proposed project ma detail and the 1tillowua checked conomenls do awl in anyy way constitute or imply. District approval of endorsGmoaf of the proposed piojecl evnh respect to (loud Ifaaazi, public health alld safkiy Of other such issue: No aumnncnt. 'I'lIis illtjetct would not be impaced by I)Ntl Of Master I'}rnuwgc Plain firci lit les not arc other life dities of IcgioaaI merest ploposed. 'bis ploicet invoNs District Mnsicr plan faeiliues. The Dlsrict will neem ownership of such flulifies on wlitlell Ieeprest of file City. Pacililics nursl be construced to Dislrlr( sfantlads and District plan check sad inspection will be required ler 1)nt oct acceptance. Plat eheek• inspection and odminrso rove Icon will he regmifed. l'hls tu>)cci proposes c•hiamcls, storm drains 36 inches of largelill dit1oleWl or other ihcilhlcs That mild be conste�uel a'cgunhdlll natwc andhu a logical extension of the. ifooptcd Master Dr tnabc Plo l I lic District would consider accepting ewnuthip of such f1wililies on writtenset test of [Ile City. Ilerhhos fmbe ust constueled to Disuicl suni(huds, Incl District plan cheek fill(] inspector ls,M he iequircvl for Uisoiut uccepi:uice. Plan eheek, inspecllun and adwinisuntive fees+vill be required. X _ '.I'his project is loerrled within Ire Imnils ol'the Dist ict's Wem I: sh ole Awa Di ainn(,c Pl m fur which dMinirg6e fees film bicn adopted: applicable fees should be paid by c ishlu check lir money ofdei oiw ly the Flood C:oallot District of (city prior to issfuinca of gilding permits. Fees it, be paid should be ai (lie rife in cued ail the little of issuance ofthe actual permit, X An enetoaehmcnt permil shall be obtained ter any construction rilliled activities sic caul cap, within District right of way or facilities. For fulther infinrmatfon, conlact the Dish im's' miaoeohnu;nl puma section fit 95(!)55.1166. I+our wilier Storm Drain (71•.NRIt,AA fNPDRMA'1'iQN 'Ihn projad may require it National Pollutant Dischalge Hinmraion ,, �slcna (M'DGS) pounit floor the Slate Water Rm usaces Control Board nec. Cleaulot grading, la".— Doo of other linnl'aapploval should nol be glvea until the City bas dews Ilistal that Ills project has bean grated it pamil of is nhoasm to be exemPl. If this project involves If I cdcotl I ueibency Management Agtrcv (FEMA) nnglpud flood plum, then the Clty SlIOUld feipiire the o tpltermt to plovide till studies cilculalit �iluns and other inibrnf awn nqulred m meet l+MA rvcpuremieus, and should Jorther require, Iha al dm >phcunt obtain f mulitional 1 0td.tt of Map Revision (C1,0MR) pilar to (trading, ng, ion or 01601 iinrl approval ol't�le project, cud it Letter of Mop Revision (LC)MR) prior to omcupangv. 11 o liIIIIII ll watercourse or nrippod Maori plain is Iniparrod 11y,Ibis pro; eco the C•itj, should ret (lire 1110 a iplicanl to obtain a Suction Ifi(12 Agreement from are California Departinoni 01 FiNh ❑ue� (lame »nd a Clem N raer Act . eclion 404 Pol'Init fiom the I s Arniy (bops of Lfigincus of wriucn correspoodcli(e from these a wales imhcaing the project is esungm. liam illesas w(lifliCneros A Cleat Water Act Section 401 Non f Quality ('Clson mil, bo rogidred him IIIc lucid ('.11donmin Regional Wafer Qtmlity Control Board pffor if) ksualreo of Ilse Colp, 404 permit. vcay 11111), yours, c' Rlvursadc (-onniv Phinning Deparinuan Alta Krisli Lowhilly SKNi:)lw 2-1 li( NR{ 45I IV{'l�z� Cinsinccl'ing Project Manager Dale: November j 2—rtJJA. _. .l, j Lril=1 John V. Rossi Comment Letter 1 s,$ F MUNICH PA6, DISTRICT W Securing Your Water Supply Chados U. Fiold Thomas P. Evans Brenda Dennstodt ii e"""a i I I,dsIoI ? I1 i ' ,. November 5, 2014 Richard ). MacHott, Planning Manager Community Development Department City of Lake Elsinore 130 south Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Donald 1).6e11uano S.R, "Al" Lopez Iii��i,Jond In�iek;ifL RE: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2014-02 This letter Is in response to the Notice of Public Hearing and Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, received on October 20, 2014. Western Municipal Water District (Western) has no comments on Mitigated Negative Declaration No, 2014-02. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Development Services at (951.) 571-7100. Best Regards, WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT r Tracy L. Costello Development Services Supervisor Enclosure(s): Copy of Notice of Public Hearing Letter � I;flCi=IVE:3? 1-1 ClIYQ)i ,r1i". i'_[_.,Ii\1OIZI P1 ANNING DJv/f rI )N 1-0205 Merldi.m Parkway, Riverside, GA 9251II . Main No. WO 'J1-7100 , wmwd,r..nn TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT Recirculated Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Comments and Responses to Comments California Department of Water Resources (DWR), 2006. Elsinore Groundwater Basin. California's Groundwater Basin 118, 2003 Update. California Environmental Protection Agency. Cortese List Data Resources. Available online at: http://www.calepa.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Coilesel.ist/default.}hnrn, accessed June 2013. City of Lake Elsinore, Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. City of Lake Elsinore, 2009. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2008-2030. Adopted July 14, 2009. City of Lake Elsinore, 2011. City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. Available online at: littp://www.lake-elsinoic.org/itidex.aspx?page=913, adopted by the City Council on December 13, 2011. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD), 2008. Wastewater Master Plan. May 2008. EVMWD, 2011. Urban Water Management Plan. May 2011. Firesafe Planning Solutions, 2012. Fire Behavior Analysis Report and Protection Plan Terracina. November 7, 2012. Lake Elsinore Unified School District (LEUSD). LEUSD Facilities Master Plan 2012. Adopted by the Governing Board January 24, 2013. LGC Inland Inc., 2004. Updated Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Valley Assemblage, 148-Acre Multi-Parcel Property, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County California. August 27, 2004 LGC Inland Inc, 2008. Updated Environmental Site Assessment of Tract 32786 "Terracing" Northwest Corner of Dryden Street and Arnold Avenue in the City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County California. February 6, 2008. Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), 2011. 2011 Riverside County Congestion Management Program. Available online at: http://www.retc.ot-g/uploads/media_items/congestionmanagement program.original.pdf, dated December 14, 2011. Spectrum Communities, 2014. Draft'Ferracina Specific Plan. January 2014. Spectrum Communities, 2014. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557 in the City of Lake Elsinore, California. April 25, 2104. State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), 2013a. 2010 Integrated Report (Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List/305(b) Report) — Statewide. Available online at: http://www,waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/tUndl/integrated2010.shtml, last updated March 8, 2013. SWRCB, 2013b. GeoTracker Available online at: https://geott'acker.watet-boards.ca.gov/, accessed June 2013. 1 o'eema Spear e Plan Protect 87 FSA / 130284 Final Initial Study/Miligated Negative Oeclaralion November 2014 References Air Resources Board (ARB), 2012. Ambient Air Quality Standards. Available online at: http://www.ai-b.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aags2.pdf, last updated June 7, 2012. ARB, 2013. State and National Area Designation Maps. Available online at: http://www.ai b.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.litm, last updated April 22, 2013. Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.. 2007. Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation and 40-Scale Rough Grading Plan Review Report, Tract No, 32786, Terracina Project, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California. April 20, 2007. At Associates, 2004. Cultural Resources Assessment of Tentative Tract 32786, 151.15-acres Located in the Terra Cotta Section of the City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County. September 2004. Archaeological Associates, 2005x. Pre-Construction Paleontological Survey of 151.15-Acres of Vacant Land as Shown on TTM 32786 in the Terra Cotta Section of the City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County. April 25, 2005. Archaeological Associates, 2005b. Phase Il Significance Evaluation of Prehistoric Archaeological Site RI V-5783, Located within Tentative Tract 32786, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County. June 24, 2005. Archaeological Associates, 2013. Addendum Report. Updated Cultural Resources Investigation of the 150.8-Acre Terracina Project (Vesting Tract Map No. 36557) City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, August 5, 2013. California Department of Conservation, 1991. Mineral Land Classification of the Temescal Valley Area, Riverside County, California. Division of Mines and Geology. Special Report 165. California Department of Conservation 2012a, Riverside County Williamson Act FY 2008/2009 Sheet 1 of 3. Available online at: ftp:/Php.coiisrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/wa/riverside_w_08_09_WA.pdf, dated 2012. California Department of Conservation 2012b Riverside County Important Farmland 2010 Sheet 1 of 3, Available online at: ftp:Hftp.consrv,ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2010/rivlO_west.pdf, dated January 2012. California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), 2013. Solid Waste Information System Facility Site Search, Available online at: http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWI'acilities/Directory/Scarcli.aspx, accessed June 2013. California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DISC) 2013. Envirostor database. Available online at: http://wwNv.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/, accessed June 2013. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 2013. California Scenic Highway Program. Available online at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/l.aiidAi-ch/scenic_liigliways/seenic_hwy.htm, last updated April 12,2012. Terracina Speo f c Pla i P .ted 86 ESA 1130294 Final nitial SILINYWitlgated Negative Declaration November 2014 Mandatory Findings of Significance a) Have the potential to degrade the quality of the ® ❑ environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish orwildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Have environmental effects that would cause ® ❑ ❑ substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Discussion a) The project would not result in significant impacts to special -status plant or wildlife populations or habitat. The project does not affect important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. Mitigation measures have been incorporated to reduce potential impacts to unknown resources to a less -than -significant level. b) Cumulative impacts which could potentially be significant are included within the resource -specific discussions above (Items 1-17). The cumulative analysis considered past projects, existing projects, future projects. With mitigation, curnulative impacts would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. c) As analyzed in the specific -resources sections above any environmental affects directly or indirectly affecting humans would be reduced to a less -than -significant level with mitigation. Terracina Specific Plan Project 85 ESA / 130294 Final Initial Stnoy/Mitigaled Negative Declaration November 2014 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE— Would the project: a) Have the potential to degrade the quality of the ® ❑ environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish orwildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Have environmental effects that would cause ® ❑ ❑ substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Discussion a) The project would not result in significant impacts to special -status plant or wildlife populations or habitat. The project does not affect important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. Mitigation measures have been incorporated to reduce potential impacts to unknown resources to a less -than -significant level. b) Cumulative impacts which could potentially be significant are included within the resource -specific discussions above (Items 1-17). The cumulative analysis considered past projects, existing projects, future projects. With mitigation, curnulative impacts would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. c) As analyzed in the specific -resources sections above any environmental affects directly or indirectly affecting humans would be reduced to a less -than -significant level with mitigation. Terracina Specific Plan Project 85 ESA / 130294 Final Initial Stnoy/Mitigaled Negative Declaration November 2014 (2011). Both documents have identified that future water and wastewater needs identified by development of the City's Land Use Plan can be accommodated, although additional water and wastewater facilities will be needed for cumulative growth. As discussed previously, the project proposes less residential development (468 dwelling units) then could ultimately be built under the existing maximum allowable density (825 dwelling units). As the project does not exceed the development assumptions of the City's Land Use Plan it is anticipated to be consistent with the findings of the Wastewater Master Plan and Urban Water Management Plan, which are based on these assumptions. The project proponent will be required to pay for utility rates and connection fees to reduce the impacts from increased demands to water and wastewater services to a less - than -significant level. Construction of new lines or expansion of existing lines is not proposed at this time and thus is not analyzed in this document. Future improvements for cumulative development would be subject to environmental analysis pursuant to CEQA and City review and approvals. C) As discussed in Item 9d and e, the project would include installation of new on-site drainage infrastructure on site sufficient to convey the proposed stormwater flows to three infiltration or detention basins. Treated or excess flows would be routed to either natural waterways or to the existing 42 -inch storm drain along Lakeshore Drive. Overall, the project would result in a net reduction in peak storm flows in comparison to existing conditions and would not require off-site construction or expansion of stormwater facilities. As such, this impact would be less than significant. f) Chapter 14.12 of the City Municipal Code requires that project construction divert a minimum of 50 percent of construction and demolition debris. Following construction, the project would be served by CR&R, the City's franchise trash hauler. All residents would be provided 60 -gallon containers for garbage, recycling and recycling. These containers would be hauled to either a Materials Recovery Facility, transfer facility or landfill in Riverside County. The landfills typically used by the City of Lake Elsinore are the El Sobrante, Badlands and Lamb Canyon Landfills. The El Sobrante Landfill is the closest to the project site. The EI Sobrante, Badlands and Lamb Canyon Landfills based on current planning efforts and permitted daily capacity have anticipated closure dates of 2045, 2024, and 2021 respectively (CalRecycle, 2013). Both the Badlands Landfill and the Lamb Canyon Landfill also have room for potential expansion (City of Lake Elsinore, 2011). As the amount of solid waste generated by the project would be accommodated by these existing landfills and overall solid waste would be reduced by the provision of recycling and green waste residential collection, impacts from the project would be less than significant. g) The proposed project would comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste and thus no impacts would occur for this issue. I' ... un. Specific PI f PmjeU 84 ESA / 130294 Final ti.1 SW,Mt,M t,i ted Neyative Dec{ ... lion November 2014 Utilities and Service Systems Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Conflict with wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ® ❑ wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ❑ ❑ water drainage facilities, or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the El project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ❑ ® ❑ provider that would serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ❑ El capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Discussion a,b,d,e) The following is a discussion of impacts related to public water and wastewater service for the project. Water and wastewater service would be provided by the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) via existing Tines near along streets adjacent to the project site. EVMWD provides water, wastewater and reclaimed water service to the Cities of Lake Elsinore, Canyon Lake, Wildoil portions of the City of Murrieta and unincorporated portions of Riverside County. There are existing 8 -inch and 30- inch water lines along Lakeshore Drive, Terra Cotta Road, Dryden Street, Stoddard Street and Swan Avenue which would be used for connections to water service. The site would have a looped water system to help meet domestic water pressure and fire -flow pressure requirements. For wastewater, a lift station would be located on site and would be maintained by EVMWD. Wastewater flows firm the project site would be collected and would be conveyed to the existing I0 -inch sewer line on Lakeshore Drive. The EVMWD is currently in compliance with the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board's treatment requirements. The EVMWD Wastewater Master Plan (2008) anticipates average and peak wastewater flows at 2030 and full buildout. Similarly the EVMWD Urban Water Management Plan Projects future water supplies through 2030 for both normal and dry -year scenarios Terracina Specific Plan Proper 83 CSA 1130294 Final Initial SfutlylMlligaled Negative Declaration November 2014 to address traffic impacts. A traffic improvement plan which includes the timing of phased improvements shall be submitted to the City of Lake Elsinore for review and approval prior to issuance of any grading permits for the project. Where improvements are needed to mitigate for operational impacts, the improvements must be in place and operational before occupancy permits are issued. Mitigation Measure TRA -7: The developer will comply with the traffic conditions of approval determined by the City of Lake Elsinore for the project, including but not limited to, the payment of Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees and Traffic Infrastructure Fees as listed and required in Mitigation Measure TRA -4 and appropriate conditions of approval. b) The Congestion Management Program (CMP) for Riverside County is prepared and updated by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC, 2011). Interstate 15 and State Highway 74 are highways within the CMP; however, neither has existing deficiencies (below LOS E) in the vicinity of the City. The project would contribute to unacceptable levels of service at 1-15 intersection ramps under both existing and cumulative conditions; however, with the implementation of mitigation measure TRA -7, impacts would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. Thus, the project's contribution is considered Tess than significant with mitigation. C) The project would not result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks. Therefore, no impact would result. d) There is a potential traffic hazard from the off -set intersection at Terra Cotta Road and Lakeshore Drive. The installation of a traffic signal required under mitigation measure TRA -5 would reduce this impact to less than significant. c, f) The proposed circulation system, including all sight distance design requirements, number of access points, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities will comply with City codes, policies and standards. Each village area would have two separate points of ingress and egress with the exception of Village 6 which would connect only to Terra Cotta Road. Bikeways and sidewalks would be constructed within the rights-of-way of perimeter streets for Lakeshore Drive and Terra Cotta Road and neighborhood bikeways and sidewalks would be construction within rights-of-way for all on-site local streets to allow connectivity to arterial streets. Therefore, less than significant impacts would result for these issues. Terretana Specific Plan Project 82 ESA 1130294 Proal nidal SWdYIM1119ated Negative Declaration November 2014 Mitigation Measure TRA -5: The developer shall construct on-site and off-site roadway improvements, including but not limited to, the following: a. Construct Terra Cotta Road at its full -width improvement as a Secondary Highway with a 90 -foot right-of-way from Lakeshore Drive north to the northern boundary of the project prior to building permit issuance. b. Construct the extension of Terra Cotta Road from the north project boundary to Nichols Road with a paved roadway section, as approved by the City Engineer, in conjunction with development. C. Construct the extension of Hoff Avenue from the west project boundary to Terra Cotta Road with a paved roadway section, as approved by the City Engineer, in conjunction with development. d. pay fair share of construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Terra Cotta Road (NS) and Nichols Road (EW). e. Construct Lakeshore Drive adjacent to the project site at its ultimate half - section width including sidewalk and parkway improvements consistent with the adjacent improved sections of Lakeshore Drive and additional 14' width for a northbound right turn lane on Lakeshore at Terra Cotta Road in conjunction with development. f. Intall a traffic signal at the off -set intersection of Lakeshore Drive and Terra Cotta Road. g. Construct Dryden Street adjacent to the project site at its ultimate halt' section width including sidewalk and parkway improvements in conjunction with development. Dryden Street shall be restricted to right turn in/out and left turns in only at its intersection with Lakeshore Drive. It. Construct Stoddard Street adjacent to the project site at its ultimate half - section width including sidewalk and parkway improvements in conjunction with development. i. On-site traffic signing/striping shall be implemented in accordance with detailed street improvement plans for the project. j. Sight distance at the project accesses shall comply with standard California Department of Transportation/City of Lake Elsinore sight distance standards. The final grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans shall demonstrate that sight distance standards are met. Such plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Lake Elsinore prior to the issuance of any grading permits for the project. Mitigation Measure TRA -6: The traffic improvements to be installed by the developer will be phased improvements as required by the build -out of the project Terracing Specific Plan Project 81 ESA 1130294 Final 11,111.1 StIldylMltiyaled Ne0ative Declaration November 2014 U W O a N D J a w Q J D U 0 Z Q z c z F- J N m w Fw v Y m U m Q Q m d N @ � c a a E o r m r N a N N r r •2 a o a FL" E$ 3 a d c 0 O O U N y � O W LL U m W Q Q Q LL Q Q m Q U ❑ U LL o w d LL T w e m m of "� of of of v ro ro � ❑ 'C 10 N M m N M W a Y Q LL m U U LL Q Q Q LL Q Q U Q U U U LL W J �¢ T E N MO N N d' V M O O t0 N r (D l0 N 0I N c0 M oOff O T m O 6l a7 � W O O N 0I U ❑ O� N N Ol T N M N O, S n Y O m m � � m � � � Q � � � � Q m 3 m J a pC ^L N N O> [O N O 3 n a O m Q m Q . m Q aE m J W ❑ N Y O ❑ ❑ U m U Q Q Q W Q Q m Q U U m W W N o u T :J ❑ a y a � O LL m U U w Q Q Q LL Q Q m Q m U U w m X N Of h O I1J N M N W M t0 N N ^ OJ (O r Q+ W Q d Ol M N O O] 47 of O W a7 V pj OJ r r �O ❑ Ol r N N N O� N C n n n n n n ¢ n ¢ a n n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v `I N in in W N d d d W N N al (n (n T d c 6565 65 6565,6), 65 6) 0— —0 —0 3 U N N @ @ N N N N N N N N @ @ N 0 o r F o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1- r Q o U U U U U U U U U U U U a � N @ O o m � m j N v N N O O N O ❑ @ O N @ '�O ❑ ❑ U U O v v Z Z E E m ❑ o Q i v w > E Q s o m m K K K o Z N O N N N N N N C E N In J J @ @ Q J m m m m m Z U J @ @ @ m m J — o O o 0 0 @ @ @ w w Z @ N N N K fL CL K K N N N N N > T T C v E O O O O O N a O N U U U U U C C C N @ d N M 4 6 (O r of O) Q ' N O O O w n o z `v � U O w F -_ For Existing Plus Project traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours, with implementation of Mitigation Measures TRA -4 through TRA -7. Cumulative Plus Project Conditions Table 16 provides a summary of cunmlative Level of Service impacts for study intersections and residual Level of Service after incorporation of planned improvements. Cumulative conditions considers existing traffic, development of other projects including Alberhill Ranch and area wide growth at opening year 2016. For Cumulative Plus Project traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours, except for the following study area intersections that are projected to operate at unacceptable Levels of Service during the peak how's: • Lake Street (NS) at: 0 1-15 Freeway NB Ramps (EW)—#1 0 1-15 Freeway SB Ramps (EW) — #2 • Terra Cotta Road (NS) at: o Nichols Road (EW) — #5 o Lakeshore Drive (EW)—#9 • 1-15 Freeway NB Rannps (NS) at Nichols Road (EW)—#17 A traffic signal is projected to be warranted at the intersection of Terra Cotta Road (NS) at Nichols Road (EW) - 45, for Cumulative Plus Project traffic conditions. For Cumulative Plus Project traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak howl, with implementation of Mitigation Measure TRA -4 through TRA -7. Mitigation Measure TRA -4: The developer shall participate in the phased construction of the off-site intersection improvements through payment of established City of Lake Elsinore fees, participation in the Western Riverside Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees program, payment of the project's fair share traffic contribution (see Tables 9 and 10 of Appendix E), assessment district and/or community facilities district financing, and construction of off-site facilities under appropriate fee credit agreements. Terr.al . Speufi, Plen Project 79 ESA 1130204 Proal Initial StutlylMitigatetl Negative Ded latioo November 2014 • Lake Street (NS) at: o 1-15 h'reeway NB Ramps (EW) — #1 c, 1-15 Freeway SB Ramps (EW) —#2 • 1-15 Freeway SB Ramps (NS) atNichols Road (EW) —#16 Existing Plus Project Conditions The proposed development is projected to generate approximately 4,561 daily vehicle trips, 359 of which occur during the morning peak hour and 475 of which occur during the evening peak hour, as shown in Table 15. TABLE 15 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Land Use Size Daily In Out Total In Out Total Single Family 448 dwelling 4,265 85 251 336 282 166 448 Detached Residential units Multi -Family 51 dwelling 296 4 19 23 18 9 27 Attached Residential units Total Project Trips 4,561 89 270 359 300 175 475 SOURCE'. Appendix E. Table 16 provides a summary of Level of Service impacts for study intersections and residual Level of Service after incorporation of mitigation (Mitigation Measure TRA -4 through 7). For Existing Plus Project traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak Vows, except for the following Study area intersections that are projected to operate at unacceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours: • Lake Street (NS) at: 0 1-15 Freeway N13 Ramps (EW) —# 1 0 1-15 Freeway SB Ramps (EW) —#2 Terra Cotta Road (NS) at: • Terra Cotta Road (NS) at: o Nichols Road (EW) @ Terra Cotta Road —45 o Lakeshore Drive (EW) r Terra Cotta Road —#9 • 1-15 Fi eeway NB Ramps (NS) at Nichols Road (EW)—#17 Traffic signals are projected to be warranted at the following additional study area intersections for Existing Plus Project traffic conditions: • Terra Cotta Road (NS) at Lakeshore Drive (EW)—#9 • 1-15 Freeway NB Ramps (NS) at Nichols Road (EW) — 417 Terracina Specific Plan Project 78 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Ste[Iy/Mitigated Negative Dedaralion November 2014 Discussion A Traffic Impact Analysis (KunZlnan Associates, Inc., 2013) was prepared to analyze the potential impacts to transportation and traffic resulting from the proposed project and was used in the preparation of this section. The study involves 17 intersections within the project area including Interstate 15 (I-15) freeway ramps. A list of these intersections and related figures for setting and analysis are included in Appendix E. a) Construction The project is not anticipated to conflict with applicable plans, ordinances, or policies related to traffic and transportation during construction. While the project would have a less than significant impact during construction, Mitigation Measures TRA -1, TRA -2 and TRA -3 are included to further reduce impacts: Mitigation Measure TRA -1: The developer shall require that the speed of earth- moving equipment will be 25 miles per hour of less, and shall post signs onsite to this effect. Mitigation Measure TRA -2: The developer shall use reasonable trip reduction requirements during project construction including, for example, contracting with a local food truck company to provide lunch onsite. Mitigation Measure TIZA-3: Terrra Cotta Road shall be graded and used as construction access prior to precise grading activities. Prior to building permits, Terra Cotta Road shall be paved (final lift to be placed at completion of building activity). Construction traffic shall use Terra Cotta via Nichols Road to minimize impacts to existing residents. Operation The definition of an intersection deficiency has been obtained from the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. The General Plan states that peak hour intersection operations of Level of Service D or better are generally acceptable. Therefore, any intersection operating at Level of Service E to F was considered deficient. For existing traffic conditions, the study area intersections are currently operating within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours except for the following study area intersections that currently operate at unacceptable Levels of Service during the morning peak hour: • Lake Street (NS) at 1-15 Freeway NB Ramps (EW) —91 • Terra Cotta Road (NS) at Lakeshore Drive (EW) — #9 The unsignalized intersections have been evaluated for traffic signals using the California Department of Transportation Warrant 3 Peak Hour traffic signal warrant analysis, as specified in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices 2003 California Supplement, dated January 21, 2010. Traffic signals appear to currently be warranted at the fol lowing study area intersections for existing traffic conditions: Terracing specific Plan Project 77 ESA 1130294 Final Inival Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 the project for neighborhood recreation which would reduce direct impacts to a less than significant level. As discussed in Item 14,a.iv above, cumulative development through 2030 would require new or expanded recreational facilities. The timing of these projects however has not been determined and thus analysis of fixture park sites at this time would be speculative; however, these projects will be subject to CEQA and/or City plan review once they are proposed. The City requires the proposed project to dedicate land or fees in lieu for park and recreation facilities in order to achieve a standard of five acres of park space per 1,000 residents. The project does not provide 8.8 acres of park space and will be required to pay in -lieu fees to the City Park Capital hnprovement Fund, as required by Chapter 16.12 and 16.34 of the City Municipal Code. This would reduce the project's cunmlative impact to a less -than -significant level. b) The recreational areas proposed as part of the project are analyzed throughout this Initial Study. The project would, not otherwise require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities and thus would have less -than -significant impacts for this issue. Transportation and Traffic Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 16. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC — Would the project: a) Conflict win an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ❑ establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ❑ program, including, but not limited to, level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location, that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? ® ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El Z El Z ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Terraciva Specific Plan Project 76 ESA / 130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 sites at this tinge would be speculative; however, these projects will be subject to CEQA and/or City plan review once they are proposed. The City requires the proposed project to dedicate land or fees in lieu for park and recreation facilities in order to achieve a standard of five acres of park space per 1,000 residents. As discussed under Item 14a.ii, the project is anticipated to have a population of 1,766.5 persons, which by City requirements would require 8.8 acres of park space or payment of in -lieu fees. The project does not provide 8.8 acres of park space and will be required to pay in -lieu fees to the City Park Capital Improvement Fund, as required by Chapter 16.12 and 16.34 of the City Municipal Code. This would reduce the project's cumulative impact to a less -than - significant level. a.v) The City is part of the Riverside County Library System. The nearest library to the project site is the Lakeside Library at 32593 Riverside Drive, approximately 1.5 miles south of the project site. The proposed project will increase population and associated burden on City libraries. The project alone is not anticipated to result in the need for a new library; however, increased development under buildout conditions within the City could eventually require expansion of existing facilities. The timing of expansion or new facilities however has not been determined and thus analysis of future library sites at this tithe would be speculative; however, these projects will be subject to CEQA and/or City plan review once they are proposed. The project will be required to pay a Library Mitigation Fee pursuant to Chapter 16.34 of the City Municipal Code to reduce the project's impact to a less -than -significant level. Recreation Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 15. RECREATION —Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional El parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facilities would occur or be accelerated? b) Include recreational facilities or require the El ❑ construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Discussion a) The development of residential uses would increase demands on recreational facilities including parks. To offset this increased demand, the project incorporates recreational areas and open space for new residences. The proposed project includes 1.6 acres of parkland and 22 acres ofopen space. The project also allows for an additional recreation area to be located in Village 6 for the multi -family residential development. The development of this park space and open space on site would fulfill demands created by Terraclna Specific Plan Protect 75 LSA 1130294 Final Initial SWtlylMitigaterl Negative Declaration November 2014 TABLE 13 EXISTING SCHOOL CAPACITY School 2012/2013 Enrollment Maximum Design Use Available Capacity Machado Elementary School 684 953 269 Terra Cotta Middle School 1,323 1,913 590 Lakeside High School 1,875 2,918 1,043 SOURCE'. LEUSD, 2013. TABLE 14 PROJECT STUDENT GENERATION Single Single Family Family Multifamily Generation Students Generation Multifamily Available Rate Generated Rate (Students Students Total Capacity (Students per (for 448 per Dwelling Generated Students (see Table School Dwelling Unit) units) Unit) (for 51units) Generated 13) Machado 0.2865 128.35 0.1303 6.65 140.00 269 Elementary School Terra Cotta 0.1446 64.78 0.0528 2.69 67.47 590 Middle School Lakeside High 0.1911 85.61 0.0706 3.60 89.21 1,043 School SOURCE! LEUSD, 2013. Given the number of proposed residential projects, the Facilities Master Plan anticipates that additional school sites will be needed under buildout conditions. Three elementary school sites, including one in the Alberhill area have been identified as schools that would be needed in the future. The timing of these projects however has not been determined given a recent decline in enrollment and reduced housing development due to minket conditions. As such, the analysis of future school sites at this time would be Speculative; however, these projects will be subject to CEQA and/or City plan review once they are proposed by LEUSD. The project would help to fund capital improvements through the previously mentioned school fees, reducing the project's contribution to a less -than -significant level. a.iv) The project includes 1.6 acres of park space. This park space is part of the project and the environmental impacts of development are analyzed in this document. The development of this park space on site would fulfill demands created by the project for a neighborhood park which would reduce direct impacts to a less than significant level. Development of the City through 2030 as identified in the City's Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2009) will require new park facilities to satisfy cumulative needs. The timing of these projects however has not been determined and thus analysis of future park 1'enainna Specific Plan Project 74 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 Impacts associated with wildfires are discussed under Hazards and Hazardous Materials. The Specific Plan includes a fuel modification plan to address the risk of wildfire (Spectrum Communities, 2012). a.ii) The City of Lake Elsinore contracts for police services through the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. The Sheriff s Station is located at 333 West Limited Avenue, three miles southeast of the project site. The City is staffed at approximately 0.85 officers per 1,000 residents with a goal of 1.0 officer per 1,000 residents (City of Lake Elsinore 2011). The project would increase the demand for law enforcement services. The project proposes 468 residential units and the City has approximately 3.5 persons per household (California Department of Finance, 2013), thus the project population would be estimated at 1,638 persons. At current staffing levels (0.85 officers per 1,000 residents) the project would be anticipated to result in the need for an additional 1.4 police officers, and at goal staffing levels (1.0 officer per 1,000 residents) the project would result in the need for an additional 1.6 police officers. The staffing of 1.4 to 1.6 additional police officer positions is not anticipated to result in the need for a new police station or substation; however, increased development within the City could eventually require additional substations. The project would generate General Fund revenue through development fees and property taxes along with other development to compensate for cumulative police facility needs. As the development would not require new facilities and would contribute toward funding future facilities to address cumulative needs, this impact is considered less than significant. a.iii) The proposed project would develop residential uses which would increase school enrollment within the Lake Elsinore Unified School District (LEUSD). The project site would be served by Machado Elementary School, Terra Cotta Middle School and Lakeside High School as identified by the LEUSD Facilities Master Plan (2013). Under buildout conditions however, the Facilities Master Plate anticipates that the project site would be served by a new elementary school in the Alberhill area. Table 13 identifies the available design capacity (including use of non -permanent structures) at the existing elementary schools that would serve the project. Table 14 identifies the number of students per school that would be generated by the project. As shown in Tables 13 and 14, there is currently capacity to support students generated by the proposed project. Additionally the project is required to pay appropriate school fees, in accordance with AB 2926, AB 1600 and AB 181. As the existing schools have capacity for the project and school fees would contribute towards facility maintenance, the direct impact of the project would be less than significant. Terracina Specilic Plan Protect 73 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Sid ly/Miti gated Negative Declaration November 2014 Public Services Potentially Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact 14. PUBLIC SERVICES —Would the project: a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of, or the need for, new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the following public services: Less Than Significant with Less Than Mitigation Significant Incorporation Impact No Impact i) Fire protection? ❑ El ® 11 ii) Police protection? ❑ El M F iii) Schools? ❑ El ® ❑ Iv) Parks? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ v) Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Discussion a. i) The City of Lake Elsinore contracts for fire services with the Riverside County Fire Department (ACED) and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). The closest fire station to the project site is Station 85, the McVicker Park Fire Station. This fire station is located at 29405 McVicker Canyon Park Road in Lake Elsinore, just over one mile southwest of the southern project boundary. There are three other stations within the City limits although the newer Rosetta Canyon Fire Station (Station 97) will not be staffed until July 2013. Response times are established by RCFD guidelines with a goal calling for response to any location within the City to be seven minutes, with the intent to reduce that time to five minutes (City of Lake Elsinore, 2011). The project would increase the demand for fire suppression and emergency medical response services. Design of the proposed project is required to comply with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes (e.g., hydrants, water flow, fuel modification zones, and street design) to reduce the risks associated with fire. The project is within 7 minutes driving time of Station 85 with the southern portion being within 5 minutes driving time. The project is not anticipated to result in the need for new fire facilities as the RCFD currently has an unstaffed station which would house any increased operations for the City and improve overall City response tiles. Increased development within the City could eventually require the development of new fire stations to maintain a response goal of five to seven minutes, although it is difficult to attribute this need to any one development. The project would generate General Fund revenue through development fees and property taxes along with other development to compensate for cumulative fire facility needs. As the development would not require new facilities and would contribute toward funding future facilities to address cunmlative needs, this impact is considered less than significant. Teaecina Sp afID Plan Project 72 ESA 1130294 Proal Initial Study1M,ficate0 Negative Declaration November 2014 f) The closest private airstrip to the proposed project is McConville Airstrip, which is approximately 4 miles southwest of the project site. Therefore, project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. No impact would result. Population and Housing Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING —Would the project a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ® ❑ directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing ❑ ❑ units, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ❑ the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Discussion a) The project would provide residential units for the population already planned for by the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. The Low Density Residential designation comprises 27 acres and has a maximum allowed density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre. The Low - Medium Density Residential designation comprises 124 acres and has a maximum allowed density of 6.0 dwelling units per acre. Thus, the existing general plan would allow for up to 825 dwelling units, while the project proposes 468 units. Therefore, the project related growth is anticipated and would be less than significant. b,c) The project would not result in the displacement of people or housing as the site is currently vacant. Therefore, the project would have no impact with respect to these issues. Terracina Specific Pian Project 71 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Wig2letl Negative Declaration November 2014 Terracina Specific Phil Project 70 ESA 1130294 Final Initial StudeMingated Negative Declaration November 2014 Distance Noise Levels (dBA CNEL) from roadway Existing centerline to Plus Exceeds Significant Roadway Segment receiver (ft) Existing Project Increase Standards Increase? Dryden Lakeshore Drive to 35 59.1 59.1 0.0 NO NO Street Cimmaron Road Cimmaron Road to 35 59.0 59.0 0.0 NO NO Arnold Avenue Grand South of Lakeshore Drive 60 51.1 51.3 +0.1 NO NO Avenue Gunnerson Arnold Avenue to 40 59.0" 62.1 +3.0 NO NO Street Lakeshore Drive Hoff East of Terra Cotta Road 60 59.0" 59.2 +0.2 NO NO Avenue Lake Street North of Nichols Road 60 69.4 69.6 +0.2 YES NO Lakeshore Lake Street to Terra Cotta Road 55 68.4 68.4 0.0 YES NO Drive Terra Cotta Road to 55 68.9 69.0 +0.0 YES NO Dryden Street Dryden Street to Machado 45 70.1 70.2 +0.1 YES NO Street Machado Street to 40 71.1 71.1 0.0 YES NO Gunnerson Street Gunnerson Street to 50 70.1 70.1 0.0 YES NO Riverside Drive East of Riverside Drive 40 70.0 70.0 0.0 YES NO Machado South of Lakeshore Drive 45 63.6 63.7 +0.1 YES NO Street Nichols Terra Cotta Road to 860 54.3 54.6 +0.3 NO NO Road 1-15 Freeway Riverside North of Lakeshore Drive 65 70.1 70.2 +0.0 YES NO Drive (SR -74) South of Lakeshore Drive 55 71.3 71.3 0.0 YES NO Terra Cotta Lakeshore Drive to Naples Way 40 50.7 55.6 +4.8 NO NO Road Terracina Drive to Hoff Avenue 200 59.0' 59.8 +0.7 NO NO Hoff Avenue to Nichols Road 380 59.0` 59.4 +0.4 NO NO " Road segment has nominal existing traffic or is not built. Existing noise levels were assumed to be equal to ambient noise levels at the nearest measured location. SOURCE. Appendix D C) The closest public airport to the proposed project is the Perris Valley Airport, which is located over 9 miles northeast of the project site. The project site is not located within an airport land use plan, nor is it located within two miles of a public airport or public use airport. Therefore, project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. No impact would result. Terracina Specific Phil Project 70 ESA 1130294 Final Initial StudeMingated Negative Declaration November 2014 existing noise levels already exceed the 65 dBA Ldn residential standard, or (2) the project increases noise levels frons below the 65 dBA Ldn standard to above 65 dBA Ldn. Noise levels along project area roadways are projected to increase from 0.0 to 4.8 dBA with the completion and operation of the proposed project. The largest increase, along Terra Cotta Road between Lakeshore Drive and Naples Way, will be 4.8 dBA Ldn, which falls below the level of increase that is considered to be readily perceptible (5 dB). Further, noise levels at the sensitive receptor closest to this segment will not exceed 65 dBA Ldn. 'Therefore, project related traffic noise will not result in a significant impact. b) Construction of the proposed project and passing haul trucks will both generate ground - borne vibration noise that may be perceptible at the nearest sensitive receptor. Ground - borne vibration is an oscillatory motion that is often described by the average amplitude of its velocity in inches per second or more specifically, peak particle velocity. The ambient peak particle velocity of a residential area is commonly .0003 inches per second or less, well below the threshold of human perception of .0059 inches per second. Nonetheless, human reactions to vibration are highly subjective, and even levels below the threshold can cause Minor annoyances like rattling of dishes, doors, or fixtures. The most vibration -causing piece of equipment that will likely be used on-site is the vibratory roller. This machine can cause vibration strong enough to annoy people over 100 feet away. Due to the proximity of adjacent single-family detached residential dwelling units, project construction activities inay result in ground borne vibration that is annoying but would only occur during site grading and preparation activities. Construction vibration will not result in any structural damage and this temporary and intermittent impact is not considered significant.. Based on Caltrans data, haul trucks would not be anticipated to exceed 0.10 in/sec peak particle velocity (ppv) at 10 feet. This level can be considered annoying if constant; however, the passage of haul trucks would be temporary and intermittent. Predicted vibration levels at the nearest offsite structures, which are located in excess of 25 feet from the traveled roadway segments would be even less. This impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures N01-6 and N01-7 provide even further assurances or less than significant impacts by limiting haul truck flours and posting contact information for noise complaints on site. TABLE 12 PREDICTED FUTURE ROADWAY NOISE LEVELS I areaclna Specific Plan Project 69 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negativo Declaration Novembar 2014 Distance Noise Levels (dBA CNEL) from roadway Existing centerline to Plus Exceeds Significant Roadway Segment receiver (i Existing Project Increase Standards Increase? 1-15 North of Lake Street 850 71.5 71,5 0.0 YES NO Freeway South of Nichols Road 230 76.9 76.9 0.0 YES NO Arnold Stoddard Street to 37 51.1 51.3 +0L1 NO NO Avenue Gunderson Street I areaclna Specific Plan Project 69 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negativo Declaration Novembar 2014 foot. Barriers shall descend all the way to the ground and contain no holes or openings. Barriers shall wrap around to protect the side yards of lots adjacent to intersections. Recommended barrier configurations are shown in Appendix D (Figures 12 and 13) of this Initial Study. Mitigation Measure N0I-9: As it is usually not aesthetically desirable to construct barrier high enough to reduce interior noise levels at second story sensitive receptors, enhanced building construction mcthods and materials must be employed to attenuate the approximately 20-28 dB required to achieve acceptable interior noise levels of 45 dBA Ldn. These methods include: Noise Level Reduction of 15-20 dBA 1. Air conditioning or mechanical ventilation 2. Double -paned glass 3. Solid core doors with weather stripping and seals Noise Level Reduction of 20-25 dBA Measures 1-3 above and: 4. Stucco or brick veneer exterior walls or wood siding with one-half inch thick fiberboard underlayer 5. Glass portions of windows/doors not to exceed 20 percent 6. Exterior vents facing noise source shall be baffled Noise Level Reduction of 25-30 dBA Measures 1-6 above and: 7. Interior sheetrock of exterior wall attached to studs by resilient channels or double walls 8. Window assemblies, doors, wall construction materials, and insulation shall have a lab -tested STC rating of 30 or greater. Off -Site Traffic Noise Impacts The FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model - FHWA-RD-77-108 was used to modet Existing and Existing Plus Project noise levels for each roadway segment analyzed in the traffic study prepared for the proposed project. The Existing traffic noise modeling resulted in noise levels ranging between 51.1 and 76.9 dBA Ldn at nearby sensitive receptors located near roadways. The Existing Plus Project traffic noise model resulted in noise levels ranging from 51.3 to 769 dBA Ldn at nearby sensitive receptor. The results of the traffic noise model are shown in Table 12. For purposes of this study, roadway noise impacts would be considered significant if the project increases noise levels for a noise sensitive land use by 3 dBA Ldn and if: (1) the Terrac na Specific Plan Noted 68 ESA 1130294 Pnal Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 Mitigation Measure N0I-6: The developer shall limit haul truck deliveries to weekdays only and from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Haul routes shall avoid residential neighborhoods, following the haul routes determined by the City. Mitigation Measure N0I-7: For the duration of construction activities, the construction manager shall serve as the contact person should noise levels become disruptive to local residents. Developer shall post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact regarding noise complaints. The construction manager, within seventy-two (72) hours of receipt of a noise complaint, shall either take corrective actions or, if immediate action is not feasible, provide a plan or corrective action to address the source of the noise complaint. Traffic Noise Impacts to the Proposed Project Buildout noise levels along Lakeshore Drive and Terra Cotta Road were modeled using SoundPLAN. Unmitigated buildout traffic noise levels could reach up to 71.2 dBA Ldn at the first floor (exterior) of proposed sensitive receptors along Lakeshore Drive and up to 73.1 dBA Ldn at second story (exterior) receptor. Unmitigated buildout traffic noise levels at proposed sensitive receptor along Terra Cotta Road could reach up to 70.5 dBA Ldn at first floor (exterior) receptor and up to 69.3 dBA Ldn at those on the second floor (exterior). Mitigation will be required in oder to achieve the Title 24 California Building Code interior noise levels requirement of 45 dBA Ldn for multi -family housing and the General Plan exterior noise requirement of 65 dBA Ldn for all dwelling unit types. A six-foot barrier was modeled along Lakeshore Drive (Lots 5-16) and the northwest side of Terra Cotta Road (Lots 431-441 and 459-468, or entire frontage of Village 6) using SOLIMPLAN. A five foot barrier was also modeled along the southeast side of Terra Cotta Road (Lots 66-72). Construction of these barriers would reduce exterior noise levels at first floor sensitive receptors to below 65 dBA Ldn. Mitigated buildout traffic noise levels and contours for selected representative sensitive receptors are shown in Appendix D. It is not feasible to construct a barrier high enough to reduce noise at second story sensitive receptors to acceptable levels. Therefore, enhanced building construction methods and materials must be employed to achieve acceptable interior noise levels. These methods include (but are not limited to) providing mechanical ventilation, using double paned glass, baffling exterior vents, and utilizing construction materials with a Sound Transmission Class (STC) of 30 or greater. Mitigation Measures N0I-7 and N0I-8 would reduce impacts to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation Measure N0I-8: Mitigation is required in order to achieve exterior noise levels of 65 dBA Ldn at several proposed sensitive receptor adjacent to Lakeshore Drive and Terra Cotta Road. This mitigation shall be provided by constructing a five-foot barrier along the property lines of Lots 66-72 and a six-foot high barrier at the property lines of Lots 5-16, 431-441, and 459-468. A six-foot barrier will be constructed along the entire frontage with Terra Cotta Road. Barriers shall be constructed of any material weighing at least 4 pounds per square Terracina Specific Plan Project 67 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Sledy/Mitigated Negative Deo.,Wilon November 2014 project construction noise contours were calculated using RCNM. Without mitigation, sensitive receptors up to 160 feet from the property line (approximately 40 homes) could experience noise levels over 75 dBA 1 -max which exceeds the City of Lake Elsinore noise standards during the day and is considered a potentially significant impact. Unmitigated noise levels could also reach 60 dBA 1 -max up to 890 feet from the property line, which encompasses much of the surrounding neighborhoods. Construction noise levels at sensitive receptors within this area would exceed City of Lake Elsinore standards if construction occurred at night (7:00 PM to 7:00 AM), on weekends or on holidays. With the implementation of construction Mitigation Measures N01-1 through N01-7, construction noise levels would comply with the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and impacts would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation Measure N0I-1: During all project site excavation and grading on- site, construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturer standards. The contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site. Mitigation Measure N0I-2: The contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise/vibration sources and sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. Mitigation Measure N0I-3: Temporary noise barriers that provide at least 10 dBA in attenuation must be installed when project construction occurs within 100 feet of existing residential structures. Any such barriers shall break the line of sight from noise generators to sensitive receptors. They shall also be constructed as close to the sensitive receptor as possible to achieve the greatest attenuation effect and have no gaps or openings. Such barriers shall be maintained throughout the construction period. Mitigation Measure N0I-4: Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation and construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and shall cease no later than 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Only finish work and similar interior construction may be conducted on Saturdays and may commence no earlier than 8:00 am and shall cease no later than 4:00 p.m. Construction activity shall not take place on Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. Mitigation Measure N0I-5: During construction, the developer shall require that all contractors turn off all construction equipment and delivery vehicles when not in use and prohibit idling in excess of 3 minutes. Easily visible signs shall be posted at the project site informing contractors and operators of this requirement. I erracina Specific Plan Project 66 ESA 1139294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Decarallon November 2014 a,c,d) The following is a discussion of construction and operation phase noise impacts. Construction Noise The initial phase of construction would involve mass grading of the site, along with site development activities. Mass site grading is expected to produce the highest construction noise levels. Grading of the site is estimated to require several graders, dozers, excavators, scrapers, and pickup trucks. Following site preparation activities, the project would include construction of buildings. Construction of the buildings would require the following phases: site development, building construction, architectural coatings application, and paving associated with buildings. A drop-off rate of 6 dBA per doubling of distance from proposed construction noise sources was utilized to calculate noise levels at nearby sensitive receptors. Maximum noise levels were calculated utilizing the Road Construction Noise Model (RCNM) provided by the Federal Highway Administration (Fl IWA). Unmitigated noise levels could reach a maximum noise level of up to 85.0 dBA Lmax at 50 feet, which is the closest to the nearest sensitive receptor that the loudest piece of equipment (a grader) is likely to be working for any length of time. Noise levels will lower substantially as construction moves away from the property line. The maximum noise level would be 79.0 dBA Lmax at 100 feet, 65.0 dBA Lmax at 500 feet, and 59.0 dBA Lmax at 1,000 feet. Section 17.176.080 of the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code restricts construction which creates a noise disturbance across a residential or commercial real property line at night and on weekends or holidays. The code sets a maximum allowed construction noise level of 75 dBA Lmax in single-family residential areas between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. The code also sets a limit of 60 dBA Lmax in single-family residential areas between the hours of 7:00 PM and 7:00 AM The anticipated distances to the 60 and 75 dBA Lmax Terrace a Specific Plan Project 65 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact d) Result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase ❑ ® ❑ El in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan ❑ ❑ ❑ area, or, where such a plan has not been adopted, in an area within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project located in the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Discussion A Noise Impact Analysis (Kunzman Associates, Inc., 2013) was prepared to analyze the potential impacts associated with noise resulting from the proposed project and was used in the preparation of this section (Appendix D), a,c,d) The following is a discussion of construction and operation phase noise impacts. Construction Noise The initial phase of construction would involve mass grading of the site, along with site development activities. Mass site grading is expected to produce the highest construction noise levels. Grading of the site is estimated to require several graders, dozers, excavators, scrapers, and pickup trucks. Following site preparation activities, the project would include construction of buildings. Construction of the buildings would require the following phases: site development, building construction, architectural coatings application, and paving associated with buildings. A drop-off rate of 6 dBA per doubling of distance from proposed construction noise sources was utilized to calculate noise levels at nearby sensitive receptors. Maximum noise levels were calculated utilizing the Road Construction Noise Model (RCNM) provided by the Federal Highway Administration (Fl IWA). Unmitigated noise levels could reach a maximum noise level of up to 85.0 dBA Lmax at 50 feet, which is the closest to the nearest sensitive receptor that the loudest piece of equipment (a grader) is likely to be working for any length of time. Noise levels will lower substantially as construction moves away from the property line. The maximum noise level would be 79.0 dBA Lmax at 100 feet, 65.0 dBA Lmax at 500 feet, and 59.0 dBA Lmax at 1,000 feet. Section 17.176.080 of the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code restricts construction which creates a noise disturbance across a residential or commercial real property line at night and on weekends or holidays. The code sets a maximum allowed construction noise level of 75 dBA Lmax in single-family residential areas between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. The code also sets a limit of 60 dBA Lmax in single-family residential areas between the hours of 7:00 PM and 7:00 AM The anticipated distances to the 60 and 75 dBA Lmax Terrace a Specific Plan Project 65 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 Mineral Resources Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact incorporation Impact No Impact 11, MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ❑ ❑ ® ❑ resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? L) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ❑ ❑ M ❑ mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Discussion a,b) The eastern portion of the project site is within a Mineral Resource Zone 3a (MRZ-3a) as delineated by the California Geological Survey (1991). The MRZ-3a designation indicates that a known mineral deposit of an undetermined significance is present on the site (kaolinite clay). "The Pacific Clay Products, which operated the large Alberhill kaolinite clay mine north of the project site, formerly owned a portion of the project site. Though the MRZ-3a designation indicates a known occurrence of minerals of undetermined significance, the project site was never mined for kaolinite clay. In addition, the MRZ-3a designation does not take into consideration the ability to extract a mineral in an economically viable manner; rather the designation merely indicates the presence of known mineral resource. A mineral resource review, previously prepared by Lawson & Associates Geotechnical Consulting, 1110., concluded that the recovery of potential mineral resources from this site would not be economically viable because of varying soil types and the lack of viable clay deposits (i.e, clayey siltstone within the Silverado Formation). Therefore, less than significant impacts to mineral resources would result from the project. Noise Less Than Significant Potentially will, Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 12. NOISE —Would the project: a) Result in exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Result in exposure of persons to, or generation of, excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) Result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Terracina Specilic Plan Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 64 ESA / 130294 November 2014 size to cause harm or damage to property. Thus, there would be no impact for these issues. Land Use and Land Use Planning a) The project does not divide an established community. While there are residential uses east and west of the site these neighborhoods these neighborhoods are separated by the knoll on the southern portion of the property and lack connecting or unifying features. The project site has been planned and is zoned for further residential development. For these reasons, the project does not divide an established community. b) The project would construct single- and multi -family residential uses within an area that is designated for residential use by the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. While the project requires rezoning to Specific Plan, the development would not exceed the existing allowable density for the project site. The existing Low Density Residential designation comprises 27 acres and has a maximum allowed density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre. The existing Low -Medium Density Residential designation co uprises 124 acres and has a maximum allowed density of 6.0 dwelling units per acre. Thus, the existing general plan would allow for up to 825 dwelling units. The Specific Plan includes a discussion of the consistency with the General Plan and determined that the Specific Plan was consistent (Spectrum Communities, 2014). The project must undergo City review and ultimately must be consistent with existing City policy to be adopted or propose an amendment to existing City policies (e.g. rezoning of the project site to Specific Plan for consistency with the City Zoning Plan is part of the project). "Thus, the project is not anticipated to conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation and this impact is considered less than significant. C) For a discussion of the MSHCP, refer to Biological Resources, Terradna Specho Plan Project 63 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 10. LAND USE AND LAND USE PLANNING — Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ M L) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or M regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan M ❑ or natural community conservation plan? Discussion a) The project does not divide an established community. While there are residential uses east and west of the site these neighborhoods these neighborhoods are separated by the knoll on the southern portion of the property and lack connecting or unifying features. The project site has been planned and is zoned for further residential development. For these reasons, the project does not divide an established community. b) The project would construct single- and multi -family residential uses within an area that is designated for residential use by the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. While the project requires rezoning to Specific Plan, the development would not exceed the existing allowable density for the project site. The existing Low Density Residential designation comprises 27 acres and has a maximum allowed density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre. The existing Low -Medium Density Residential designation co uprises 124 acres and has a maximum allowed density of 6.0 dwelling units per acre. Thus, the existing general plan would allow for up to 825 dwelling units. The Specific Plan includes a discussion of the consistency with the General Plan and determined that the Specific Plan was consistent (Spectrum Communities, 2014). The project must undergo City review and ultimately must be consistent with existing City policy to be adopted or propose an amendment to existing City policies (e.g. rezoning of the project site to Specific Plan for consistency with the City Zoning Plan is part of the project). "Thus, the project is not anticipated to conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation and this impact is considered less than significant. C) For a discussion of the MSHCP, refer to Biological Resources, Terradna Specho Plan Project 63 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 TABLE 11 SOURCE: Appendix C With respect to drainage infrastructure, the project would include installation of new drainage infrastructure on site, sufficient to convey the proposed stormwater flows. Stormwater would be discharged from the site to natural waterways or to municipal storm sewer facilities that are anticipated to maintain sufficient capacity to carry the anticipated flows. Overall, the project would result in a net reduction in peak storm flows in comparison to existing conditions. Therefore, potential effects on downstream stone infrastructure would be less than significant. g,h,i) No portion of the project area is located within a I00 -year flood zone. Therefore the project would not place housing within a I00 -year flood zone, nor would it place structures or other facilities within a 100 -year flood zone such that flood flows could be altered. Additionally, the project is not protected from flooding by a dam or levee, or by any other flood control structure, the failure of which could cause harm. Thus, there would be no impact for these issues. j) The project is located inland and at an elevation of at least 1,300 feet above sea level. Therefore, the project area would not be affected by tsunami. The project is not located immediately adjacent to a lake or other large water body, and therefore would not be affected by sciche. Finally, the project is located within a small watershed of limited area. Although the watershed has moderate topographic relief and some areas of light vegetation cover, watershed size is not large enough to generate a mudflow of sufticient Terracina Specific Plan Projecl 62 ESA 1130294 F(nal Initial SWdyll NeBativc Oedaraiion November 2014 EXISTING AND MODELED WITH PROJECT STORMWATER DISCHARGES Discharge (cubic feet per second) Existing Conditions With Project Storm Type 1 -hr 3 -hr 6 -hr 24 -hr 1 -hr 3 -hr 6 -hr 24 -hr Basin A 2 -yr 130.0 91.5 82,6 13.6 98.8 57.9 49.4 13.4 5 -yr 197.4 147.3 134.8 41.2 154.5 99.9 86.3 21.0 10 -yr 248.8 189.9 174.8 63.3 221.0 155.6 140.4 59.6 Basin B 2 -yr 72.0 48.1 42.1 7.3 26.8 15.3 13.1 2.6 5 -yr 112.8 81.1 72.9 16.0 41.3 25.9 23.3 6.3 10 -yr 166.2 129.8 119.7 48.5 59.4 43.2 41.7 31.2 Basin C 2 -yr 23.2 13.6 11.9 2.8 12.2 8.0 7.4 2.8 5 -yr 23.8 15.2 13.9 4.1 17.9 12.4 11.6 4.0 10 -yr 27.9 18.7 17.4 6.0 23.8 17.2 16.3 6.7 SOURCE: Appendix C With respect to drainage infrastructure, the project would include installation of new drainage infrastructure on site, sufficient to convey the proposed stormwater flows. Stormwater would be discharged from the site to natural waterways or to municipal storm sewer facilities that are anticipated to maintain sufficient capacity to carry the anticipated flows. Overall, the project would result in a net reduction in peak storm flows in comparison to existing conditions. Therefore, potential effects on downstream stone infrastructure would be less than significant. g,h,i) No portion of the project area is located within a I00 -year flood zone. Therefore the project would not place housing within a I00 -year flood zone, nor would it place structures or other facilities within a 100 -year flood zone such that flood flows could be altered. Additionally, the project is not protected from flooding by a dam or levee, or by any other flood control structure, the failure of which could cause harm. Thus, there would be no impact for these issues. j) The project is located inland and at an elevation of at least 1,300 feet above sea level. Therefore, the project area would not be affected by tsunami. The project is not located immediately adjacent to a lake or other large water body, and therefore would not be affected by sciche. Finally, the project is located within a small watershed of limited area. Although the watershed has moderate topographic relief and some areas of light vegetation cover, watershed size is not large enough to generate a mudflow of sufticient Terracina Specific Plan Projecl 62 ESA 1130294 F(nal Initial SWdyll NeBativc Oedaraiion November 2014 WQMP including adherence to applicable permit conditions and requirements, potential operation period water quality impacts would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. b) With respect to groundwater supplies, the project would not directly involve the pumping of groundwater during construction or operation. The project would result in the installation of new impervious surfaces. Impervious surfaces prevent the infiltration of groundwater into the subsurface, and can result in reduced infiltration of stormwater into the underlying sediments, resulting in reduced groundwater recharge. However, as discussed previously, groundwater recharge in the Elsinore Groundwater Basin occurs primarily along alluvium within existing streambeds. The project would not place new impervious surfaces in such areas. Additionally, under existing conditions, there is only limited groundwater underlying the project site. Therefore, the project would not substantially interfere with groundwater recharge or substantially deplete groundwater supplies and would result in less -than -significant impacts. d,e) The project would involve on site grading and the installation of roadways, residential areas, and other facilities, which would alter existing drainage patterns on site. In order to manage stormwater after construction, the project would install permanent drainage systems including paved streets, catch basins, storm drains, curbs and gutters, and detention basins. These would be used in order to collect stormwater and detain it on site and/or discharge it to natural waterways. Additionally, as discussed for Items 9a, c, and f, the project would also include implementation of a WQMP for the project site, which would specify additional BMPs for the management of stormwater on site, in order to further reduce potential for discharges from the site during operation. Thus the project would result in less -than -significant impacts with respect to drainage patterns. In order to quantify the potential effects of the project on stormwater and drainage, in comparison to existing conditions, a Preliminary Hydrology Analysis was completed for the site (Appendix C). The Preliminary Hydrology Analysis included a review of existing on site drainage conditions, as well as a modeled hydrologic/stormwater analysis. As discussed in greater detail in Appendix C. the project area was modeled based on three basins (A -C). Results from the modeled analysis are shown in Table 11, which provides a comparison anticipated stormwater discharges for existing conditions in comparison to the project, for each of the three basins, for 2 -year, 5 -year, and 10 -year storm events. As shown in Table 11, the project would result in substantial reductions in stormwater discharge for subbasins A and B, where most of the project -related discharge would occur. The project would result in a slight increase in stormwater discharge for Basin C, the smallest of the three basins considered, with the maximum increase oi'5.0 cubic feet per second (cfs) indicated for a 10 -year, 1 -hour storm event within Basin C. However, this increase in discharge would be offset by much more substantial reductions in discharge from the other two basins. For example, for the 10 -year, 1 -hour storm event, modeled reductions for Basins A and B would total almost 129 cfs. Therefore, the project would not result in a net increase in stormwater discharge from the site. Terracina Specific Plan Project 61 ESA 1130204 Final Initial SWtlylMltlgated Negative Declaration November 2014 include monitoring and reporting requirements to ensure that needed BMPs are deployed appropriately, and that potential water quality pollutant releases would be minimized in order to protect downstream beneficial use. During the post-conshvction period, the project could result in various long term impacts to water quality from sources consistent with residential development. These include potential for release of various pollutants into stormwater, including the following: • motor oil, antifreeze, brake dust, and other automotive fluids and compounds • paint, soap, and household cleaners • sediment • lawn clippings and yard waste • litter/trash • pesticides and herbicides • animal wastes These and other potential water quality pollutants associated with the proposed development could build up on the proposed roadways, other impervious surfaces, and other residential uses during dry periods. During storm events, these pollutants could become entrained in stormwater and be discharged into municipal storm drains and eventually discharge into downstream waterways. The project would include installation of permanent drainage systems (i.e., paved streets, catch basins, storm drains, curbs and gutters, and detention basins) to capture and direct runoff from the project. Additionally, the project would be required to adhere to the conditions of the current municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) permit for Riverside County (CAS 618033; Order No. R8-2002-0011). A preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Appendix B of this Initial Study) has been prepared for the project site that incorporates the requirements of the MS4 permit and other county and city level stormwater management requirements. As discussed in greater detail in Appendix B, the WQMP would deploy a number of site optimizations and installations that would reduce potential impacts on water quality and drainage. These include preservation of existing drainage patterns, protection of existing vegetation and sensitive areas, preservation of natural infiltration capacity in natural and open space areas, minimization of impervious surfaces, and dispersal ofrunoffto adjacent pervious areas. These would be deployed in accordance with Low Impact Development (LID) procedures for minimizing effects on stormwater and stormwater quality. An array of LID BMPs would be deployed based on feasibility specific to the project site. BMPs would be sized in accordance with County and MS4 permit requirements. Key pollutants of concern that would be minimized via implementation ofthe WQMP would include bacterial indicators, nutrients, pesticides, sediment, trash and debris, and oil and grease. Therefore, with implementation of the Terrocina Specific Plan Project 60 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 1.1 million acre-feet (DWR, 2006). Average dissolved solids concentration within the basin is 460 mg/L (DWR, 2006). Water Quality Under the federal Clean Water Act, the State Water Resources Control Board's Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List of Impaired Water Bodies provides a summary overview of water bodies that are deemed as impaired for various pollutants within California. A review of the 2010 list indicated that Lake Elsinore and Temescal Creels, in the vicinity ofthe project, are listed for pollutants as shown in Table 10: Pollutant TABLE 10 CLEAN WATER ACT SECTION 303(D) IMPAIRED WATER BODIES Source TMDL Schedule Lake Elsinore Nutrients Unknown Nonpoint Source Approved, 2005 Organic Enrichment/Low Dissolved Unknown Nonpoint Source Approved, 2005 Oxygen PCBs Source Unknown Estimated Completion 2019 Sediment Toxicity Source Unknown Estimated Completion 2021 Unknown Toxicity Source Unknown Estimated Completion, 2007 Temescal Creek Indicator Bacteria Source Unknown Estimated Completion, 2021 SOURCE'. SWRCB, 2013 Impact Analysis a,c,f) The project would include construction activities such as grading, earth moving, installation of roads and subsurface infrastructure, and various other construction related activities that could result in temporary upset of surface sediments. Additionally, the use of heavy construction related equipment including graders, bulldozers, excavators, and other construction machinery could result in tfie accidental release of construction fluids. "These may include oils, greases, fuels, and antifreeze, as well as other materials including concrete washout, paint washout, and other construction related water quality pollutants. During storm events, surficial sediment and as construction related pollutants could become entrained in stormwater flows. During larger storm events, stormwater flows could make their way off site, leading to an increase in pollutant concentrations downstream for construction related pollutants and sediment. However, project construction activities would be required to apply for coverage under and adhere to the requirements ofthe SWRCB's Construction General Permit. Permit conditions would include development and onsite deployment of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for all construction activities. The SWPPP would implement various BMPs designed to retain water and pollutants on site, and otherwise minimize the discharge of potential water quality pollutants to natural waterways. Permit conditions would also Terranna SpeaOc Plan Profeta 59 FSA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 Discussion Environmental Setting Surface Water and Drainage The project is located near Lake Elsinore within the Santa Ana River watershed. Lake Elsinore is fed by the San Jacinto River, which originates in the San Jacinto Mountains to the east, in central Riverside County. Under normal rainfall conditions, the San Jacinto River ends at Lake Elsinore and does not connect with the Santa Ana River. However, during years with high precipitation and runoff, the San Jacinto River flows through to the Santa Ana River. After leaving Lake Elsinore, water routes into Aberhill Creek. Aberhill Creek becomes Temescal Wash, which flows in a northwesterly direction toward the City of Corona, where it eventually merges with the Santa Ana River. The Santa Ana River and its tributaries originate in the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains to the north, and in the San Gorgonio Mountains to the east, and drains to the Pacific Ocean near Huntington Beach. The watershed drainage area surrounding the project site, including off-site and on-site areas, is approximately 308 acres. Topography is hilly, and includes an existing residential community, areas that have been previously graded for residential development (but not yet developed), and natural open space. The existing residential conununity and areas that have been previously graded but not developed drain via existing storm drain pipes to natural areas. The project site is currently undeveloped. Topography on site and in the vicinity of the project is hilly, and runoff is collected into a combination of existing natural swales, located north and west of the project site. This drainage flows toward Nichols Road, and eventually connects with'Temescal Canyon Wash, near 1-15. Drainage from the project site drains primarily into this area, with the exception of approximately 24 acres near the southern end of the project site, which drains to existing stormwater infrastructure along Dryden Street. Drainage along Dryden Street in turn drains to the south for about 1 '/2 miles before out -letting to Lake Elsinore. Flooding With respect to flooding, the project site is not located within a 100 -year flood zone (defined as a flood with a 1% annual chance of occurrence), as defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The nearest FEMA 100 -year flood zone is located downstream of the project site, approximately 0.5 mile to the east, along Temescal Carryon Wash. Groundwater A geologic investigation completed for a previously proposed development project located on the same site as the project did not identify ally substantial groundwater beneath the surface of the project site, but only identified isolated perched water in localized areas above bedrock (LGC, 2004). The project is located within the Elsinore Groundwater basin, which is bounded by the Santa Ana and Elsinore Mountains along the southwest, the Temescal Subbasin to the northwest, and by non water -bearing rocks to the northeast. Lake Elsinore is located in a closed groundwater basin. The basin contains alluvial fan, floodplain, and lacustrine deposits that reach a thickness of about 200 feet. Recharge in the basin is principally through infiltration of stream flow through alluvial fan deposits and unlined channels. Groundwater in storage has been estimated at about Terracina Specific Plan Project 58 ESA 1130294 Foal Wild SWtlylMiligated Negative Declaral'mn November 2014 the project site. The Specific Plan includes a fuel modification plan to address the risk of wildfire (Spectrum Communities, 2012). The conceptual fuel modification plan utilizes a combination of irrigated wet zone, thinning zones, physical harriers such as radiant heat walls and hardscape such as roadways to achieve defensible space that is appropriate for each interface as modeling determined the risk to be in that specific area. With the implementation of these measures the threat from wildfire would be reduced to a less - than -significant level. Hydrology and Water Quality Tereana Specific Plan Protect 57 GSA 1130294 Final Initial Stu0y/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY— Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste ® ❑ discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of a El site or area through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or by other means, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion of siltation on- or offsite? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of a site ❑ ® El or area through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or by other means, substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed El ® ❑ the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ® ❑ g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures ❑ ❑ E that would impede or redirect flood flows? if Expose people or structures to a significant risk of El loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Tereana Specific Plan Protect 57 GSA 1130294 Final Initial Stu0y/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 the database search included: Federal Superfund (EPA National Priorities List); State Response; Voluntary Cleanup; Landfill Disposal Sites; Military Sites, Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites; and other sites. The search of available environmental records revealed that the proposed subject property is not listed in any of the databases reviewed as having environmental concerns and is not located on any hazardous materials site as designated by Government Code § 6592.5. Additionally, within the vicinity of the site there are no sites which would currently present concerns to development ofthe project site. Geotracker, for example, identified two LUST sites over Yz-mile west/northwest and over 1 -mile east/southeast of the project sites; however, these sites are closed cases of soil contamination which were resolved in 190 and 1994. Another concern is the possible presence of radon. Radon is a gaseous radioactive element that leads to elevated lung cancer in humans. Sources of radon include earth and rock beneath homes, well water, and building materials. According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the general area of the site has a Radon Zone Level of 2, which has a predicted average indoor screening level of between 2.0 picoCuries per liter of air (pCi/I) and 4.0 F i/1. This level is below the USEPA action level of 4.0 pCi/I; therefore, based upon the reported subsurface characteristics of the area, the subject property exhibits a low potential for radon exposure. Based upon the previous Phase 1, as well as a review of federal, state, and local environmental databases, neither the project site nor the surrounding area present hazardous conditions for development of the site with residences. Thus, this impact is considered less than significant. e, f) The closest private airstrip to the proposed project is McConville Airstrip, which is approximately 4 miles southwest of the project site. The closest public use airport to the proposed project is the Perris Valley Airport, which is located over 9 miles northeast of the project site. The project site is not located within an airport land use plan, nor is it located within two miles of a public or private airport. The proposed project does not present a safety hazard with respect to airports. Therefore, no impact would result for these issues. g) The proposed project would not interfere with any adopted emergency response or evacuation plan. Each village area has two separate points of ingress and egress with the exception of Village 6 which would connect only to Terra Cotta Road. Development is required to comply with emergency vehicle access requirements (e.g. street width and turnaround requirements) in the 2010 CBC, including Fire Code, and thus impacts related to emergency access and evacuation would be less than significant. h) The project site is located within a CAL FIRE Local Responsibility area within the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. A Fire Behavior Analysis and Report for the project was prepared by Firesafe Planning Solutions (2012) to serve as the basis for a fuels modification plan for the project site. The analysis includes modeling of worst-case fire conditions based on historic fires, wind conditions and existing fuels on and adjacent to Terracna Specific Plan Project 56 ESA 1130294 Final Initial StrobtMlligaled Negative Declarallon November 2014 quantities of hazardous materials (including fuels, lubricants, solvents, and paints) to adhere to strict requirements in handling, transporting, and storing their supplies. Pursuant to the federal 1 lazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 5101 et seq., the United States Department of Transportation promulgated strict regulations applicable to all trucks transporting hazardous materials _Occupational safety standards have been established in federal and state laws to minimize worker safety risks from both physical and chemical hazards in the workplace, including construction sites. The California Division of Occupational Safety and Health has primary responsibility for developing and enforcing standards for safe workplaces and work practices in California in accordance with regulations specified in CCR Title 8. For example, raider Title 8 CCR 5194 (Hazard Communication Standard), construction workers must be informed about hazardous substances that may be encountered and under Title 8 CCR 3203 (Injury Illness Prevention Program) workers must be properly trained to recognize workplace hazards and to take appropriate steps to reduce potential risks due to such hazards. This is particularly important where previously unidentified contamination or buried hazards may be encountered. If additional investigation or remediation is determined to be necessary, compliance with standards for hazardous waste operations (Title 8 CCR 5192) would be required for those individuals involved in the investigation or cleanup work. Thus, during construction contractors handling, storing or transporting hazardous materials or wastes must comply with regulations which would reduce the risk of accidental release and provides protocols and notification requirements should an accidental release occur. With these existing regulations, impacts during construction would be less than significant. After constriction, the proposed residential development would not involve the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials in significant quantities. Residents may use such items as gasoline, pesticides and some household cleaning products which, under normal circumstances of use, are considered less than significant. C) The nearest schools are located one-half mile west and one-half mile south of the project. The proposed project is a residential development and would not involve hazardous emissions or handling of hazardous materials. As the project site is not located within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school and does not involve hazards to nearby schools, there would be no impact for this issue. d) A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was conducted for the subject property by LGC Inland, Inc. in 2004. At this time neither the site nor surrounding properties posed significant environmental concerns which would prevent development of the project site with residential uses. ESA performed a regulatory agency database search for the project area using the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) GeoTracker and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Envirostor databases (SWRCB, 2013; DTSC, 2013) in addition to review of other hazardous site lists maintained by the State (California Environmental Protection Agency, 2013). The databases search regulatory agency lists of sites with a documented release of hazardous materials or petroleum products. Regulatory agency lists included in Terracing Sp.c c Plan Probed 55 ESA 1130204 Final Inillel SWtlylMll,galed Negg[rve Declaration November 2014 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ ❑ ® 0 environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ ® 7 environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or El 0 acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of El ® ❑ hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan ❑ ❑ or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, El ❑ ❑ would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with ❑ ® ❑ an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? I Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ❑ ❑ ® ❑ injury or death involving wildland fres, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with viildlands? Discussion a,b) The proposed project would involve the transport of fuels, lubricants, and various other liquids needed for operation of construction equipment at the site and would be transported to the construction site on an as -needed basis by equipment service trucks. Materials hazardous to humans, wildlife, and sensitive environments would be present during project construction. These materials include diesel fuel, gasoline, equipment fluids, concrete, cleaning solutions and solvents, lubricant oils, adhesives, human waste, and chemical toilets. The potential exists for direct impacts to human health and biological resources from accidental spills of small amounts of hazardous materials from construction equipment during construction. Existing federal and state law regulates the handling, storage and transport of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes. At the federal level, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA; 42 USC 6901 et seq.) requires businesses with substantial Tambora Specific Plan Protect 54 ESA 1190294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 TABLE 9 PROJECT -RELATED GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Category Proposed Project Emission ie (MT/yr) Year 2010 Emissions Area Sources 337.44 Energy Usage 2,023.10 Mobile Sources 5,961.25 Solid Waste 249.60 Water and Wastewater 219.39 Construction 83.78 Total 2010 Emissions 8,874.56 Year 2020 Emissions with Implementation of Mitigation Measures 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 Area Sources 337.37 Energy Usage 1,873.95 Mobile Sources 4,464.81 Solid Waste 249.60 Water and Wastewater 173.57 Construction 83,78 Vegetation -332.76 Total 2020 Emissions 62850.32 Percent Reduction between 2020 and 2010 emissions 22 8 City Percent Reduction Threshold 22.3% COze= carbon dioxide equivalent; MT/yr = metric tons per year SOURCE. Kurtzman Associates, Inc, 2013 (Appendix A). Mitigation Measure GRE -5: The project applicant shall implement Measure E- 1.1 from the Climate Action Plan, which requires that new developments plant a minimum one 15 gallon nondeciduous umbrella form tree per 30 linear feet of boundary length. This has been calculated to require the planting of a minimum of 470 trees on the project site. Mitigation Measure GRE -6: The project applicant shall implement Measure T- 1.4 from the Climate Action Plan, which requires that new development implement and connect to the network of bikeways, trails and safety features identified in the General Plan, Bike Lane Master Plan, Trails Master Plan and Western Riverside County Non -Motorized Transportation Plan. Terracing Specific Plan Project 53 ESA / 130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 In order to determine ifthe proposed project would comply with the Climate Action Plan Standards, the GHG emissions from the proposed project were analyzed for 1) year 2010 without implementation of the GHG reduction measures provided in the Climate Action Plan and 2) year 2020 with implementation of the GHG reduction measures provided in the Climate Action Plan. The CalEEMod Version 2011, 1.1 was used to calculate the GHG emissions from the proposed project. The proposed project is anticipated to generate GHG emissions from area sources, energy usage, mobile sources, waste disposal, water usage, and construction equipment. A summary of the results are shown below in Table 9. The proposed project in 2010 would generate 8,874.56 metric tons of CO2E per year. Without implementation of the project specific measures provided in the Climate Action Plan, the proposed project would not meet the Climate Action Plan's GI IG emissions reduction target of 22.3 percent by 2020. This would result in a potentially significant impact. Mitigation Measures GRE -1, GRE -2, GRE -3, GRE -4 and GRE -5 are provided that will require the applicant to implement the measures applicable to the proposed project in the Climate Action Plan. Table 9 shows that for the year 2020 with implementation of these mitigation measures, the proposed project would generate 6,850.32 metric tons of CO2E per year, which represents a 22.8 percent reduction in GHG emissions. As this is within the Climate Action Plan's target reduction of at least 22.3 percent, with mitigation the project would have a less than significant impact with respect to GHG emissions. Mitigation Measure GRE -1: The project applicant shall implement Measure E- 1.3 from the Climate Action Plan, which requires that all of the proposed structures exceed the 2008 Title 24 energy efficiency standards by a minimum of 15 percent. Mitigation Measure GRE -2: The project applicant shall implement Measure T- 1.2 from the Climate Action Plan, which requires the installation ol' sidewalks along all new streets to link neighborhood activity centers, major destinations and transit facilities. Mitigation Measure GRE -3: The project applicant shall implement Measure E- 4.1 from the Climate Action Plan, which requires that the Landscape Plan for the proposed project adhere to the City's Assembly Bill 1881 Landscape Ordinance. Mitigation Measure GRE -4: The project applicant shall implement Measure E-4.2 from the Climate Action Plan, which requires that new developments reduce indoor water consumption by 30 percent. This shall be achieved through the use of low -flow mixtures for all faucets, toilets and showers that are installed in the proposed project. Terraclne Specific Plan Pro)ect 52 ESA 1130284 Pinel Initial SWtlylMitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 emissions resulting from the proposed project and was used in the preparation of this section. The City of Lake Elsinore has adopted a Climate Action Plan that requires a 22.3 percent reduction in GHG emissions per service population between years 2008 and 2020. These efficiency -based targets were derived by dividing the statewide Assembly Bill (AB) 32 targeted emissions levels for 2020 and statewide Executive Order S-3-05 targeted emissions level for 2030 by the 2020 and 2030 statewide service population respectively, These targets represent the maximum quantity of emissions each resident and employee in the State of California could emit in 2020 and 2030 based on emissions levels necessary to achieve the statewide AB 32 and Executive Order S-3-05 GHG emissions reduction goals. The City of Lake Elsinore Climate Action Plan also contains the following GHG-related measures that are applicable to the proposed project: • T-1.2 Pedestrian InfrashRucture. Through the development review process, require the installation of sidewalks along new and reconstructed streets. Also require new subdivisions and large developments to provide sidewalks or paths to internally link all uses where applicable and provide connections to neighborhood activity centers, major destinations, and transit facilities contiguous with the project site; implement through conditions ofapproval. • E-1.1 Tree Planting Requirements. Through the development review process, require new development to plant at minimum one 15 -gallon nondeciduous, umbrella -form tree per 30 linear feet of boundary length near buildings, per the Municipal Code. Trees shall be planted in strategic locations around buildings or to shade pavement in parking lots and streets. E-1.3 Energy Efficient Building Standards. Adopt an ordinance requiring that all new construction exceed the California Energy Code requirements, based on the 2008 Energy Efficiency Standards by 15 percent (consistent with CalGreen Tier 1), through either the performance based or prescriptive approach described in the California Green Building Code; implement through conditions of approval. Alternately, a solar photovoltaic system and/or solar water heating may be used to assist in meeting all or a portion of the 15 percent requirement. E-4.1 Landscaping Ordinance. Through the development review process, enforce the City's Assembly Bill 1881 Landscaping Ordinance; implement through conditions of approval. E-4.2 Indoor Water Conservation Requirements. Amend the City's Uniform Building Code to require development projects to reduce indoor water consumption by 30 percent (consistent with CalGreen Tier 1, Section A5.303.2.3.1), and implement through conditions of approval. Por the purposes of this analysis the proposed project would generate a significant level of GHG emissions and be inconsistent with the Climate Action Plan if the proposed project did not meet the target reduction of at least 22.3 percent between the year 2010 (closest year available to 2008 in CalEEMod) and 2020. I crac to Specific Platt Project 51 ESA / 130294 Final Initial Sluby/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 Field investigations indicated groundwater to beat a depth of 9 to 17 feet below the existing surface. The effects of liquefaction would not be a factor due to depth of the liquefiable soils along with the volume ofoverburden materials above the liquefiable zone. Therefore, liquefaction would not manifest itself at the surface. Soils that exhibit moderate to high shrink/swell potential may Cause damage to components, including underground utilities, pipelines, foundations, and infrastructure. Onsite soils expansion potential is very low to very high as indicated in the previous geotechnical investigation. The project would be constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building Code (CBC) as amended by Chapter 15 of the City Municipal Code. The project would also adhere to the recommendations of the gcotechnical report. By incorporating standard design features recommended in the geotechnical investigation and identified in the CBC, impacts would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. b) According to data from the Natural Resources Conservation Service, soils of the project area and vicinity have slight to moderate erosion potential with one soil type showing high erosion potential. Erosion control measures would be included as required by the Water Quality Management Plan and the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan for the project's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. These measures would include revegetating disturbed soils (unless otherwise specified by the fuels modification plan) and covering any soils stockpiles among other standard practices. By implementing these measures, iurpacts with respect to erosion would be less than significant. C) The project would connect to a public sewer and thus this issue is not applicable. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Potentially Significant Issues land Supporting Information Sources): Impact 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS— Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ❑ indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Less Than Significant with Less Than Mitigation Significant Incorporation Impact No Impact ® ❑ ❑ b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation ❑ ® ❑ ❑ adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Discussion a,b) An Air Quality and Global Climate Change Impact Analysis (Kunzman Associates, Inc., 2013) was prepared to analyze the potential impacts associated with greenhouse gas __------------- Terracing Spec f e Plan Project 50 GSA 1130294 Final Initial SludylMlligated Negative Declaration Novrmbor 2014 Geology, Soils, and Seismicity a,c,d) "Che project site has undergone multiple geotechnical investigations, the most recent of which was in 2007 (Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.) The discussion of seismic and soils issues are still relevant, as there Have been no significant changes to the project site or immediate vicinity since 2004, which would impact seismic or soils conditions on the project site or in the immediate vicinity. The project site is located in a seismically active area, but there are no known active faults crossing the site and the site is not located in or inunediately adjacent to an Alquist- Priolo 8arthquake Fault Zone. Therefore, ground rupture due to faulting is considered unlikely. Aerial photography of the site was reviewed and geotechnical borings and test pits were excavated in areas where a landslide would be suspected. These excavations exposed intact bedrock with massive to horizontal bedding. No landslide debris was identified, indicating that landslides were absent within that portion of the project site. Terraclna GPOCrC Plan Prolecl 49 CSA 1130294 Final Initial innd,/M1t1gatnd Negative Declaration November 2014 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 6. GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY— Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: I) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ❑ ® ❑ delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? El iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ® ❑ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ❑ 0 ® ❑ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ❑ ® ❑ or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in ® ❑ Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ❑ of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Discussion a,c,d) "Che project site has undergone multiple geotechnical investigations, the most recent of which was in 2007 (Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.) The discussion of seismic and soils issues are still relevant, as there Have been no significant changes to the project site or immediate vicinity since 2004, which would impact seismic or soils conditions on the project site or in the immediate vicinity. The project site is located in a seismically active area, but there are no known active faults crossing the site and the site is not located in or inunediately adjacent to an Alquist- Priolo 8arthquake Fault Zone. Therefore, ground rupture due to faulting is considered unlikely. Aerial photography of the site was reviewed and geotechnical borings and test pits were excavated in areas where a landslide would be suspected. These excavations exposed intact bedrock with massive to horizontal bedding. No landslide debris was identified, indicating that landslides were absent within that portion of the project site. Terraclna GPOCrC Plan Prolecl 49 CSA 1130294 Final Initial innd,/M1t1gatnd Negative Declaration November 2014 Mitigation Measure CUL. 5: A paleontological grading observation schedule by a certified paleontologist shall be maintained when grading in bedrock sedimentary units to further evaluate the fossil resources of the site. Mitigation Measure CUL -6: During construction -related activities of the project, should paleontological materials be unearthed, the Lake Elsinore Planning Department shall be notified immediately. Construction affecting the area shall be halted and the City shall coordinate the appropriate efforts for handling and/or disposition of these materials. d) Although survey results indicated that further cultural resources are not likely to be found on the project site, unidentified cultural remains including aboriginal, historic materials or human remains could be present and be potentially impacted by construction of the project. This is considered a potentially impact significant. Incorporation of Mitigation Measure CUL -7 would reduce impacts to a less -than -significant level by notifying the County Coroner should any human remains be discovered. Mitigation Measure CUL -7: If human remains are encountered, California I lealth and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours. Subsequently, the Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the "most likely descendant." The most likely descendant may then make recommendations, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98. Termi specific Plan Project 48 ESA 1130284 Final Initial 5ladylMitigated Negative Declaration Novoni 2014 grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites and human remains discovered on the site. The archaeological monitor and the appropriate Tribe will evaluate the significance of any archaeological resource discovered on the property. Tribal and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. (*It is anticipated that the Pechanga Tribe will be the "appropriate" Tribe due to prior and extensive coordination with the City in determining potentially significant impacts and appropriate mitigation measures and its demonstrated cultural affiliation with the project area.) Mitigation Measure CUL -3A: prior to any grading at or near the vicinity of the known surface boundaries of CA-RIV-5782 and CA-RIV-5783 the developer shall meet and confer with the appropriate Tribe and the project archaeologist to develop an appropriate controlled gradingplan The purpose ofthe controlled gradintat and around the site is to afford the opportunity to determine whether any subsurface resources are associated with the sites and if so to collect the resources for appropriate mitigation as outlined in the Treatment Agreement All controlled grading shall be monitored in accordance to the provisions of the Agreement required in CUL -3. Mitigation Measure CUL -4: The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the appropriate tribe for proper treatment and disposition. C) A Paleontological Survey Report was prepared in 2005 for the previously proposed residential development of the project site (Archaeological Associates). Results from this report are still relevant as there have been no significant changes to the project site or immediate vicinity since 2005, which would impact paleontological resources on the project site or in the immediate vicinity. At the tittle of the survey, no recorded fossil localities, fossil lists, published or unpublished literature within the boundaries of the project site were located. While no paleontological resources have been identified onsite, the subject property may contain paleontological resources f -on Paleocene and Pleistocene sedimentary units. The sedimentary rock unit under the site is considered to be of high paleontological sensitivity and is known to contain significant fossils near the proposed development area. Therefore, development of the project may directly or indirectly impact or destroy unidentified paleontological resources, which is considered a potentially significant impact. Incorporation of Mitigation Measures CUL -5 and CUL -6 would reduce impacts to a less -than -significant level by monitoring construction and notifying the City should any paleontological resources be discovered. 'terracina Specific Plan Project 47 ESA 1130294 Final Initial SWtly/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 course of the 2004 and 2013 field investigations of the project site, no historic resources of any kind were discovered. Although survey results indicated that further cultural resources are not likely to be found on the project site, unidentified cultural resources could be present and be potentially impacted by construction of the project. Without proper mitigation, the project could potentially impact significant cultural resources. Mitigation Measures CUL -1, CUL -2, CUL -3 and CUL -4 would reduce this impact to a less -than -significant level by monitoring earth moving -activities and notifying the City in the event of a discovery. The milling feature at RIV-5782 may be destroyed in the event tire study area is fully developed; however, this feature has been fully documented and recorded within the Eastern Information Center at UC Riverside. Consequently, adverse impacts to the milling station site have been addressed through the aforementioned recordation program. Although the cumulative total of all related project development creates the potential for additional impact to Cultural and paleontological resources, each project would develop adequate mitigation measures to substantially decrease or avoid impacts through the CEQA process and City and Comity standard conditions. Impacts to cultural and paleontological resources found on the project site would be mitigated. Therefore, no significant cumulative loss of cultural or paleontological resources would occur and cumulative impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure CUL -1: All earth moving activities within the project area during construction shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist selected from the latest Riverside County Cultural Resources Consultant List. Mitigation Measure CUL -2: If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are discovered during grading, the developer, the project archaeologist, and the appropriate gibe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeoloeical resources. If the developer and the Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Community Development Director (CDD) for decision. The CDD shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the appropriate tribe. Mitigation Measure CUL -3: At least 30 days prior to seeking a grading permit, the project applicant shall contact the appropriate Native American Tribal Representative (Representative)* to notify the Representative of the initiation of the grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Lake Elsinore and the Representative to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the responsibilities and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during I erracina Specific Pill Project 46 ESA 1130294 Final Inllial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 RIV-5782 is a small boulder hearing a milling feature. The resource could not be found during the 2013 survey and appears to have been removed during the construction of the F.,VMWD pipeline project. RIV-5782 was not considered significant within the meaning of CEQA. "Therefore, development of the project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of any identified archaeological resource. RIV-5783 was originally characterized as an artifact scatter consisting of both lithics and ground stone implements. Artifacts observed included a portable metate fragment, a basalt hammerstone, a quartzite mano fragment, and a basalt flake. During surveys in 2004, the area was noted to be highly disturbed by numerous off-road trails and dumping of household trash and greenwaste. During the 201.3 survey it was noted to be in the same condition. A Phase II investigation was conducted for cultural resource RIV-5783 and consisted of surface collection, auger sampling program, and hand unit excavation. New finds made included core fragments and several flakes. No definitive indications of a subsurface deposit were observed but such a deposit may exist on the project site. According to the results of the Phase II investigation, no significant sub -surface deposit of archaeological material was encountered and no datable finds were recovered at RIV- 5783. Therefore, the site has been determined to represent an insignificant resource and lack sufficient merit for inclusion into the California Register of Historical Resources. No further work in conjunction with RIV-5783 was recommended. Outside the project site, seven additional sites have been recorded within a one -mile radius and are described below. • RIV-3408, a lithic scatter with two loci; • RIV-3832H, an abandoned alignment of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad built in 1927; • RI V-432011, the Torn Ranch consisting of two residences (main house dating to 1924) and two large 1938 warehouses used to process walnuts; and • RIV-5784I1, concrete foundations of a former residence (circa 1920s) with associated brick landscaping. • RIV-8102, single bedrock milling stick, one possible mano, and one hammerstone. • R1V-8105, four prospect trenches and abandoned section of railroad grade • RIV-8106, three prospecting pits. It is unlikely that these seven sites will be impacted with development ofthe project because they are located outside of the project site. Therefore, development of the project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of any identified historical resource. No properties listed under the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), California Historical Landmarks (CHL), or California Points of Historical Interest (CPHI) have been recorded within the study area or within a one -mile radius. Furthermore, during the Terracme Speo(c Plan Project 45 ESA / 130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 which requires that pre -construction presence/absence survey for burrowing owls be conducted where suitable habitat is present, would result in consistency with the MSHCP. Conclusion of MSHCP Consistency As outlined above, the proposed project would be compliant with the biological requirements of the MSHCP with implementation of the project BMPs outlined in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Appendix B of this Initial Study), and implementation of Mitigation Measures B10 -I through 13I0-6; specifically this consistency pertains to the project's relationship to Reserve Assembly requirements, Section 6.1.2 (Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools), Section 6.1.3 (Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species), Section 6.1.4 (Guidelines Pertaining to the Urban/Wildlands Interface), and Section 6.3.2 (Additional Survey Needs and Procedures). Thus, the project would be consistent with the MSHCP. Cultural Resources The records search conducted for the project site indicated that a small portion (approximately 1,200 feet) of the study area was previously surveyed during a linear survey for the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) that traversed south to northeast through the middle of the subject property. A 1995 cultural resources study, conducted by Bruce Love of CRM Tech for a 1.5 mile section of proposed pipeline associated with the Temescal Valley Intertie Pipeline Project for the EVMWD, resulted in the identification of two prehistoric archaeological sites (RI V-5782 and RIV-5783). No additional sites were discovered during the 2004 or 2013 field studies conducted by Archaeological Associates. Terraclna Specific Plan Project 44 ESA 1130294 Final Initial StudyWill gated Negative Declaration November 2014 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES —Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ® ❑ ❑ significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ❑ ® ❑ ❑ resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ❑ ® E] ❑ outside of formal cemeteries? Discussion a,b) A Cultural Resources Assessment was prepared by Archaeological Associates in 2004 for the previously proposed residential development of the project site. An Addendum to this report was prepared in August 2013 to update the Cultural Resources Assessment. The records search conducted for the project site indicated that a small portion (approximately 1,200 feet) of the study area was previously surveyed during a linear survey for the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) that traversed south to northeast through the middle of the subject property. A 1995 cultural resources study, conducted by Bruce Love of CRM Tech for a 1.5 mile section of proposed pipeline associated with the Temescal Valley Intertie Pipeline Project for the EVMWD, resulted in the identification of two prehistoric archaeological sites (RI V-5782 and RIV-5783). No additional sites were discovered during the 2004 or 2013 field studies conducted by Archaeological Associates. Terraclna Specific Plan Project 44 ESA 1130294 Final Initial StudyWill gated Negative Declaration November 2014 compliance with MSHCP Reserve assembly requirements, Section 6.1.2 (Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools), Section 6.1.3 (Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species), Section 6.1.4 (Guidelines Pertaining to the Urban/Wildlands hrterface), and Section 6.3.2 (Additional Survey Needs and Procedures). Project Relationship to Reserve Assembly The entire project is located within the Elsinore Area Plan of the MSHCP. No part of the project site occurs within a Criteria Cell proposed for conservation under the MSHCP; therefore, the project is not subject to the Habitat Assessment and Negotiation Strategy or Joint Project Review processes, and thus the project is consistent with the Reserve Assembly requirements of the MSHCP. Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools The project site contains areas defined by the MSHCP as riparian/riverilie areas. The project site does not support vernal pools or vernal pool associated species. Impacts to MSHCP riparian/tiverine areas will require purchasing of credits to offset the loss of impacts to riparian/riverine areas per Mitigation Measure BIO -3. Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species The project site is located within the MSHCP NEPSSA. Focused plant surveys were conducted for species identified under Section 6.1.3 of the MSHCP in areas of the project site that contained potentially suitable habitat, and none of the NEPSSA target species were identified onsite. As such, the project is consistent with MSHCP requirements. Guidelines Pertaining to the Urban/Wildland Interface The MSHCP Urban/Wildland Interface Guidelines are intended to address indirect effects associated with locating development in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area. Indirect impacts to the off=site potential Conservation Area are discussed above under Item 4a,b for the following issues: Drainage, Toxics, Lighting, Noise, Invasive species, Barriers, and Grading/Land Development. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO -4 would reduce indirect impacts to a less -than -significant level, and would be consistent with the MSHCP. Additional Survey Needs and Procedures The project site is not located within the MSHCP Criteria Area Plant Species Survey Area (CAPSSA) pursuant to Section 6.1.3 of the MSHCP. Therefore, the CAPSSA requirements are not applicable to the project. The project site is not located within the MSHCP Additional Survey Areas for Amphibians, Mammals, or any Special Linkage Areas: but is within the Survey Area for the burrowing owl. Breeding season protocol surveys for the western burrowing owl were conducted pursuant to the Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions as set forth by the MSHCP and resulted in negative findings of burrowing owl and sign. Mitigation Measure 13I0-1, Tarsi Spaci cPlan Project 43 ESA 1133294 1inal Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 Waters potentially subject to CDFW jurisdiction total 2.34 acres, of which 1.89 acres consist of vegetated riparian habitat. The project would result in permanent impacts to 1.55 acres of CDFW jurisdictional waters, of which 1.13 acres consist of vegetated riparian habitat and 0.42 acre consists of unvegetated streambed associated with the riparian habitat. Permanent impacts will occur to 7,883 linear feet of streambed. Impacts to Corps, Regional Board and CDFW jurisdictional waters are considered a significant impact. Mitigation BIO -3 would require authorization and compensatory mitigation for project impacts. Implementation of this mitigation would reduce impacts to a Tess -than -significant level. d) The project site is not located within any established native resident or migratory wildlife corridor as the project site is surrounded by residential development to the south, east, and west. Construction and operation of the project would not interfere with existing wildlife corridors and use of any native wildlife nursery sites. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur to existing wildlife corridors. C) The General Plan has local policies or ordinances to protect biological resources of local concern including special-status/sensitive habitats and species. These impacts are discussed under Item 4a and 4b above. With coverage afforded under the MSHCP and adherence to recommended mitigation measures, impacts would be reduced to a less - than -significant level. t) The project site is located within the Elsinore Area Plan of the MSHCP, but is not located within the MSHCP Criteria Area. The project site is located within the MSHCP Burrowing Owl Survey Area and the Narrow Endemic Plant Survey Area (NEPSSA) number 1, but is not located within the MSHCP Mammal or Amphibian Survey Areas. Target plant species associated with NEPSSA 1 include Munz's onion (Allium munAi), San Diego ambrosia (Ambrosia pumila), slender horned-spineflower (Dodecahema leptoceras), many -stemmed dudleya (Dudleya multicaulis), spreading navarretia (Navarretia fossalis), California Orcutt grass (Orcuttia californica), San Miguel savory (Clinopodium chandleri), Hammitt's clay -cress (Sibaropsis hanunittii), and Wright's trichocoronis (Trichocoronis wrightii). Within the designated Survey Areas, the MSHCP requires habitat assessments, and focused surveys within areas of suitable habitat. For locations with positive survey results, the MSHCP requires that 90 percent of those portions of the property that provide for long-term conservation value for the identified species shall be avoided until it is demonstrated that conservation goals for the particular species have been met throughout the MSHCP. Findings of equivalency shall be made demonstrating that the 90 -percent standard has been met, if applicable. If equivalency findings cannot be demonstrated, then "biologically equivalent or superior preservation" must be provided. The purpose of this discussion is to provide an analysis of the proposed project with respect to compliance with biological aspects ofthe Western Riverside County MSHCP. Specifically, this analysis evaluates the proposed project with respect to the project's Ierraoina Speak Plan Project 42 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Dederetion November 2014 Mitigation Measure BIO -5: The developer shall comply with the City's updated landscape requirements for the use of native, drought -tolerant and non-invasive plants, and shall not install invasive species listed at Volume 1, Table 6-2 of the MSI ICP. This measure applies during construction and installation of improvements. Mitigation Measure BIO -G: The developer shall provide language in the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the project which requires compliance with the City's updated landscape requirements for the use of native, drought -tolerant and non-invasive plants and provides that homeowners may not replace such plants with invasive species. Developer shall incorporate into the CC&Rs the requirement that the invasive species provided on Volume I, Table 6-2 of the MSHCP are prohibited. The CC&Rs shall incorporate the list of invasive species, Volume 1, Table 6-2 of the MSHCP, for reference. Cumulative Impacts The proposed project will contribute to regional cumulative impacts as it pertains to the loss of riparian habitat, 'foraging, and live-in habitat for special status wildlife, the loss of raptor foraging habitat, and the loss of nesting bird habitat. However, with coverage under the MSHCP, and with the additional mitigation measures in this Initial Study, the cumulative impacts attributed to the project would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. b,c) A Jurisdictional Delineation was completed by Glen Lukas Associates in October 2012 for the project site. The project site was surveyed to determine the amount of waters subject to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jurisdiction pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CD'W) jurisdiction pursuant to Division 2, Chapter 6, Section 1600 of the California Fish and Game Code, and Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board jurisdiction pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA and the Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act, Potential Corpsjurisdictional waters total 0.70 acre, of which 0.09 acre consists of wetlands. A total of 8,730 linear feet of streambed is present. Potential Corps jurisdiction within the project area is limited to three drainage systems, or drainages. The project would result in permanent impacts to 0.48 acre of Corpsjurisdictional waters, of which 0.02 acre consists ofjurisdictional wetlands. Permanent impacts will occur to 7,557 linear feet of sh eambed. Waters potentially subject to Regional Board jurisdiction total 0.71 acre, of which 0.09 acre consists of wetlands. A total of 9,283 linear feet of streambed is present. The project would result in permanent impacts to 0.50 acre of Regional Board jurisdictional waters, of which, 0.02 acre consists ofjurisdictional wetlands. Permanent impacts will occur to 7,883 linear feet of streambed. Terramna Specific Plan Prefect 41 ESA 1130224 Final Initial StudyliAlh ted Negative Declaration November 2014 Mitigation Measure BI0-4: To avoid or reduce indirect impacts ofthe project on the MSHCP Conservation Area (Criteria Cell #4157) adjacent to or in close proximity of the project, the project shall include the following measures: Drainage. The project shall incorporate measures to ensure that the quantity and quality of runoff discharged to the MSHCP Conservation Area is not altered in an adverse way when compared with existing conditions. In particular, measures shall be put in place to avoid discharge of untreated surface runoff from developed and paved areas into the MSHCP Conservation Area. The project shall implement BMPs as identified in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Appendix B of this Initial Study), Toxics. Land uses proposed in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area that use chemicals or generate bioproducts such as manure that are potentially toxic or may adversely affect wildlife species, habitat or water quality shall incorporate measures to ensure that application of such chemicals does not result in discharge to the MSHCP Conservation Area. Lighting. Night lighting shall be directed away front the MSHCP Conservation Area to protect species within the MSHCP Conservation Area front direct night lighting, ensuring that ambient lighting in the MSHCP Conservation Area is not increased. Additionally, the project shall adhere to the City's lighting standards which would avoid shining light onto adjacent properties. Noise. Proposed noise generating land uses affecting the MSIICP Conservation Area shall incorporate setbacks, berms or walls to minimize the effects of noise on MSHCP Conservation Area resources pursuant to applicable rules, regulations and guidelines related to land use noise standards. The project shall include applicable structures to ensure that wildlife within the MSHCP Conservation Area will not be subject to noise that would exceed residential noise standards, both during and post -construction. Invasives. Project landscaping shall use native, drought -tolerant and non- invasive plants. Specifically, the project shall avoid the use of invasive plant species listed in Volume 1, Table 6-2 of the MSHCP. Barriers. Proposed land uses adjacent to the MSI ICP Conservation Area shall incorporate barriers, where appropriate in individual project designs to minimize unauthorized public access, domestic animal predation, illegal trespass or dumping in the MSHCP Conservation Area. Such barriers may include native landscaping, rocks/boulders, fencing, walls, signage and/or other appropriate mechanisms. Grading/Land Development. No manufactured slopes associated with the project shall extend into the MSHCP Conservation Area. Terracira Specific Plan Project 40 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Scidy/Mil gated Negative Declaration November 2014 existing conditions. Through the acquisition of mitigation credits supporting equal of- superior rsuperior values, the project would replace lost functions and values and would be considered a biologically equivalent or superior project, in compliance with the MSHCP. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BI0-3 would reduce impacts to below a level of significance. Mitigation Measure RI0-3: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall obtain the necessary authorizations from the regulatory agencies for proposed impacts tojurisdictional waters. Authorizations may include a Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, a Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and a Section 401 Water Quality Certification/Waste Discharge Requirement from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The Permittee shall offset impacts to riparian/riverine areas by purchasing credits at the Riverside -Corona Resource Conservation District in -lieu fee program, or another approved in -lieu fee program or mitigation bank within the Santa Ana River Watershed, to be approved by the appropriate regulatory agency(s). The project shall offset the loss of 1.13 acres of riparian habitat at a 3:1 ratio, for a total of 3.39 acres; and shall offset the loss of 0.42 acre of unvegetated riverine areas at a ratio of 3:1, for a total of 1.26 acres. Total compensatory mitigation shall be a minimum of 4.65 acres. Indirect Impacts The project is not expected to result in significant indirect impacts to special -status biological resources, with the implementation of measures pursuant to the MSHCP Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines (Volume I, Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP) and the BMPs in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Appendix B of this Initial Study). The Guidelines are intended to address indirect effects associated with locating projects (particularly development) in proximity to a MSHCP Conservation Area. To minimize potential edge effects, the Guidelines are to be implemented in conjunction with review of individual public and private development projects. The project site does not occur within the MSHCP Criteria, but is located adjacent to Criteria Cell #4157. The MSHCP targets approximately 45 to 55 percent of Cell 4157 for inclusion into the MSHCP Conservation Area, focusing on the western portion of the Cell. As such, the northern portion of the project site may occur adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area, or at least will occur in close proximity to the Conservation Area. As such, the project would be required to implement the Wildlife/Urban Interface Guidelines, consistent with the MSHCP. Implementation of Mitigation Measures 13104, 13I0-5, and 13I0-6 would ensure that potential indirect impacts to the MSHCP Conservation Area are reduced to below a level of significance. Terracina Specific Plan Project 39 ESA 1130294 Final Inilial SludlylMiligated Negative Declaration November 2014 raptor species. Impacts to raptor foraging habitat would be less than significant through implementation of the terms and conditions of the MSHCP, which includes payment of fees for impacts to sage scrub habitat and implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) as outlined in Appendix C of the MSHCP. Mitigation for loss of raptor foraging habitat shall also be accomplished through on-site preservation of 17.69 acres of Riversidean sage scrub. Impacts to Riparian Habitat or Sensitive Natural Communities The project footprint will have direct impacts to two sensitive native vegetation communities, totaling approximately 55.48 acres, including Riversidean sage scrub (RSS) and southern willow scrub (SWS). Impacts to MSHCP riparian/riverine areas are discussed under a separate subheading below. The proposed project would result in direct impacts to 54.35 acres of RSS in different areas of the project site, including 22.70 acres of undisturbed RSS and 31.65 acres of disturbed RSS. Of the approximately 72.17 acres of disturbed and undisturbed RSS located within the project site, 17.69 acres of RSS will be avoided, of which approximately 12.53 acres consist of undisturbed RSS. The proposed project would result in direct impacts to 1.12 acres of SWS habitat. Approximately 0.67 acre of SWS will be avoided by the project's footprint. Impacts to these two habitats would be reduced by proposed avoidance and by coverage under the MSHCP for covered species with the potential to occur in these habitats. Thus impacts would be less than significant. MSHCP Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools The project site contains approximately 2.34 acres of MSHCP riparian/riverine areas, of which 1.89 acres support riparian habitat and 0.45 acre supports unvegetated riverine habitat. Areas meeting the MSHCP definition of vernal pools were not detected during surveys. The project will impact 1.55 acres of MSHCP riparian/riverinc areas, including 1.13 acres of riparian vegetation and 0.42 acre of unvegetated riverine areas. Impacts are anticipated to be lessened by the implementation of BMPs to reduce runoff pollution impacts during construction and operation; however, impacts to riparian habitats are still considered potentially significant prior to mitigation. For unavoidable impacts to MSHCP riparian/riverine areas. Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP requires that the Permittee prepare a DBESP to ensure the replacement of any lost functions and values of habitat as it relates to Covered Species. A DBESP has been prepared and is included in Appendix G of this Initial Study. The DBESP concluded that avoidance of impacts to 1.55 acres of riparian/riverine areas is infeasible based on the nature of the project and the need to complete the construction of Terra Cotta Road along its established alignment. Given the disturbed nature of the project site, the minimized impacts to riparian/riverine areas, and the marginal habitat quality, the proposed off-site mitigation will result in a biologically equivalent or superior condition within the MSHCP Plan Area compared with the 'rommoria Specific Plan Project 38 ESA 1130294 Final Initial SWtly/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 of active nests will be avoided if burrowing owl is present during the nesting season (March 1st to August 31sT). If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish buffers around the vegetation containing the active nest of at least 150 meters. Nesting Birds The project site contains trees, shrubs, and herbaceous vegetation with the potential to support nesting birds. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code prohibit impacts to nesting birds. The project has the potential to significantly impact active nests if vegetation is to be removed during the nesting season (February 1 to August 31). Mitigation Measure 1310-2 would be implemented to ensure that the project would not result in impacts to nesting birds by avoiding the nesting season or conducting pre -construction surveys if work occurs during the nesting season. With this mitigation, impacts to nesting birds would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure BI0-2: The removal of potential nesting vegetation will be conducted outside of the nesting season (February 1 to August 31) to the extent that this is feasible. If vegetation must be removed during the nesting season, a qualified biologist shall conduct a nesting bird survey of potentially suitable nesting vegetation prior to removal. Surveys will be conducted no more than three (3) days prior to scheduled removals. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish buffers around the vegetation containing the active nest of at least 500 feet of an active listed species or raptor nest, and 300 feet of other sensitive or protected nests. The vegetation containing the active nest will not be removed, and no grading will occur within the established buffer, until a qualified biologist has determined that the nest is no longer active (i.e., the juveniles are surviving independent from the nest). If clearing is not conducted within three days of a negative survey, the nesting survey must be repeated to confirm the absence of nesting birds. Raptor Foraging Habitat The project site consists mostly of disturbed areas of non-native grasslands and RSS, which are both suitable foraging habitats for numerous raptor species. Raptors observed on-site include, two special -status species listed on the State watch list, Cooper's hawk (Accileiter cooBerii), and merlin (Falco columbarius), and four non -listed species, American kestrel (Falco sparverius), red -shouldered hawk (Buteo lineasus), red-tailed hawk (Buten jamaicensis), and turkey vulture (Catharses aura). One state listed fully protected species was observed offsite, a juvenile golden eagle (Aquila chrysoelos). Rafters species observed on-site have a low to high probability of using the project site for foraging. Abundant leporid prey (hares and rabbits) were observed on-site. No raptors were observed nesting on-site or immediately adjacent to the site during surveys. The proposed project would result in the direct loss of foraging habitat for raptor species. The majority of the project site constitutes moderate quality foraging habitat for these Terrecina Specific Plan Project 37 GSA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Dodaration November 2014 (Aquila cluysaelos, CPP), was observed off-site, just outside the project's northern boundary. In addition to those species observed on-site, the project site contains suitable habitat with the potential to support other special -status animals, including Bell's sage sparrow (Arnyhispiza helli Belli), burrowing owl (Atherte cunicularia), Dulzura pocket mouse (Chaetodipus calr'Jrorvicus,femoralis), ferruginous hawk (Buteo regalis), least Bell's vireo (Vireo belhi Euaillars), loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus), red -diamond rattlesnake (Crotalus rubor rubel), orangethroat whiptaiI (Asyidoscelis hylierythra), Quino checkerspot butterfly (Eup it,61 s editha quino), and southern California rufous -crowned sparrow (Aimophila rufceps canescens). The burrowing owl and vireo were determined to be absent from the project site based on negative results of the focused surveys. Areas meeting the MSHCP definition of vernal pools were not detected during surveys; therefore, the project site does not contain suitable habitat for the federally endangered Riverside fairy shrimp (Slrepocephalus woottoni) or other special status invertebrates associated with vernal pools. The project would result in the loss of habitat occupied by the coastal California gnatcatcher, which was documented in the southwestern portion of the project site during biological surveys conducted in 2006, and which was incidentally detected during the 2013 biological surveys. The gnatcatcher is designated as a Covered Species Adequately Conserved under the MSHCP without additional conservation requirements. Therefore, with the coverage afforded by the MSHCP, impacts to the gnatcatcher would be less than significant. Impacts to other special status -species either occurring or having the potential to occur onsite are adequately conserved under the MSHCP implementation structure and reserve design, with the exception of the rosy boa and burrowing owl. Rosy boa has low potential to occur on-site due to the low quality of the marginal habitat present on-site and thus impacts to this species are anticipated to be less than significant. Currently, the site does not support any breeding owls, and as such the project would not currently be subject to MSHCP requirements for avoidance and/or owl relocation. However. since the project site does contain habitat that could potentially support burrowing owls in the future, Mitigation Measure BIO -I is applicable pursuant to the MSHCP. This measure requires pre -construction surveys which would reduce potential impacts to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation Measure BI0-1: The project applicant shall ensure that a preconstruction presence/absence survey for burrowing owl shall be conducted where suitable habitat is present. The survey shall be conducted within 30 days prior to site disturbance. If burrowing owl are determined to be present, passive (i.e., use of one-way doors and collapse of burrows) relocation following accepted protocols will be utilized to ensure impacts to owls are minimized or avoided. Existing burrows shall be destroyed once they are vacated. In addition, disturbance Terracina Specific Plan Project 36 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November2%4 This impact analysis is also considered in the context of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) which was adopted by the City in 2004. The MSI ICP is a comprehensive, multi -jurisdictional effort that focuses on conservation of 146 species and their associated habitats within western Riverside County. The MSHCP serves as a Habitat Conservation Plan pursuant to Section 10(a)(1)(13) of the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, as well as a Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP) under the NCCP Act of 2001. The MSI ICP is used to allow the participatingjurisdictions (i.e., the County of Riverside, City of Lake Elsinore, and the other fifteen participating cities) to authOFize "take" of plants and wildlife species identified within the plan area for private projects and public works projects within the MSHCP areas. Under the MSHCP, the wildlife agencies will grant take authorization for otherwise lawful actions in exchange for the assembly and management of MSFICP Conservation Areas. Under the MSHCP and its permits, the City reviews proposed land uses in the "criteria area" to determine if they are consistent with the MSI ICP's conservation goals and if the uses will contribute to assembling the reserves. There are MSHCP survey, habitat evaluation, and mitigation fee requirements that apply to individual projects. a,b) Impacts to Special Status Plant Species One special -status plant species (California Native Plant Society [CLAPS] Rank 4.2) was detected on-site during the focused plant surveys: paniculate tarplant (Deinandra paniculato). No other special status plants were detected during focused surveys and no other special status plants are expected to occur on site due to a lack of suitable habitat and/or the level of disturbance. 'rhe project would result in impacts to scattered amounts of paniculate tarplant throughout ruderal and non-native grassland areas in the south and southeast portions of the project site. Due to the low sensitivity of this species, and the broad representation in the region, the impacts to the species would be less than significant. A previous study of the project site conducted in 2006 found one special -status plant species, Palmer's grapplinghook (I7aipagonella pabneri; CNPS Rank 4.2). The location of the Palmer's grapplinghook was not detailed in the previous report; however, focused surveys targeting areas containing potentially suitable habitat for this species yielded negative results. Regardless, impacts to any undetected Panner's grapplinghook would not result in an adverse effect on the species population and would be reduced to a less - than -significant level through coverage under the MSHCP. Impacts to Special Status Wildlife Species Five special status animals were observed within the project site, including one federal listed and state species of special concern, the coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioplila caljforiaica californica), two state designated special status species, the Cooper's hawk (Aecipiler cooperi, WL), and yellow warbler (Setophaga petechia, SSC), one state designated species of special concern, the San Diego black-tailedjackrabbit (Lepur ealifornicus henneiiii, SSC), and one unlisted but locally rare reptile species , the coastal whiptail (Aspidoseelis ligris slejnegeri). One special -status animal, the golden eagle Terracing Specific Plan Prated 35 HSA 1130294 Final Initial SludylMingated Negative Uedarolion November 2014 According to the SCAQMD, CEOA Air Qualily Handbook, land uses associated with odor complaints typically include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding. As a residential development, the proposed project does not include any uses identified by the SCAQMD as being associated with odors. Thus, the proposec project is not expected to result in objectionable odors for future residents or for the neighboring uses. Biological Resources Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact _ Incorporation Impact No Impact 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ❑ ® ❑ ❑ through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian ❑ ® ❑ ❑ habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ❑ ® ❑ ❑ protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any ❑ ❑ ® ❑ native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory Wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ❑ ® ❑ ❑ protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? 0 Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Discussion This discussion is informed by a Biological Technical Report prepared by Glenn LL1koS in August 2013 for the project (Appendix F of this Initial Study). Site specific surveys of the project site were conducted on March 14, 20, April 2, 24, May 6, 21, .lune 3, 7, 13, 24, and July 9, 19 2013. Also, a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP) Analysis was prepared on .Iuly 25, 2014 by Glenn Lukos for impacts to riparian/riverine areas. Terracina Spectre Plan Project 34 ESA 1190294 Final Initial StudylMlllgated Negative Declaration November 2014 duty construction equipment and the short-term construction schedule, the proposed project would not result in a long-term (i.e., 70 years) substantial source of toxic air contaminant emissions and corresponding individual cancer risk Therefore, no significant short-term toxic air contaminant impacts would occur during construction of the proposed project. Operations Particulate matter from diesel exhaust is the predominate TAC in urban areas and based on a statewide average in 2000 was estimated to represent about two-thirds of cancer risk from TACs. Due to the nominal number of diesel truck trips generated by the proposed residential project, a less -than -significant toxic air contaminant impact would occur during the on-going operations of the proposed project. While this impact would be less -than - significant, Mitigation Measure AIR -3 is included to further reduce potential emissions. Mitigation Measure AIR -3: Electrical outlets shall be installed on the exterior walls of all residential buildings to promote the use of electric landscape maintenance equipment. C) Cumulative projects include local development as well as general growth within the project area. However, as with most development, the greatest source of emissions is from mobile sources, which travel well out of the local area. Accordingly, the cumulative analysis for the project's air quality must be generic by nature. 'The project area is out of attainment for both ozone and PM70. Construction and operation of cumulative projects would further degrade the local air quality, as well as the air quality of the South Coast Air Basin. The greatest cumulative impact on the regional air quality will be the incremental addition of pollutants mainly from increased traffic from residential, commercial, and industrial development and the use of heavy equipment and trucks associated with the construction of these projects. Air quality will be temporarily degraded during construction activities that occur separately of- simultaneously. rsimultaneously. However, in accordance with the SCAQMD methodology, projects that do not exceed the SCAQMD criteria or can be mitigated to less than significant levels are not significant and do not add to the overall cumulative impact. As the project would result in less than significant levels with mitigation as described for Items 3b and d, this project would also have a less -than -significant cumulative impact. e) Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include the application of materials such as asphalt pavement and diesel exhaust emissions. The objectionable odors that may be produced during the construction process are short-term in nature and the odor emissions are expected cease upon the drying or hardening of the odor -producing materials. Due to the short-term nature and limited amounts of odor producing materials being utilized, odors during construction would have a less -than - significant impact. Tardoina Specific Plan Progat 33 ESA 11302&I Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeCIa21I0n Novam0er 2014 activities is required where feasible and possible. viii. The developer shall require and ensure that the contractor or builder shall suspend use of all construction equipment operations during first stage smog alerts. Operations The local air quality impacts from the operation of the proposed project would occur from emissions generated on-site. Sources of on-site operational emissions include architectural coatings off -gassing, landscaping equipment emissions, natural gas appliance emissions and on-site vehicular emissions. Because of the residential nature of the proposed project, the majority of the proposed project's operational emissions are fi-om vehicles traveling on roadways away from the project site. These emissions are then spread over avast area traversed by various mobile sources and do not result in localized air quality impacts in proximity to the project site. As such, localized operational modeling for project operations are not prepared for residential developments. Therefore, the on-going operations of the proposed project would create a less than significant operations -related impact to local air quality due to on-site emissions. Carbon Monoxide. CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. Local air quality impacts can be assessed by comparing future without and with project CO levels to the State and federal CO standards. To determine if the proposed project could cause emission levels in excess of the CO standards, a sensitivity analysis is typically conducted to determine the potential f'or CO "hot spots" at a number of intersections in the general project vicinity. Because of reduced speeds and vehicle queuing, "hot spots" typically occur at high traffic volume intersections with a Level of Service E or worse. The Traffic Impact Analysis found that with proposed road improvements, the proposed project would not decrease the Level of Service at any analyzed intersection and no analyzed intersection would operate at a Level of Service E or worse for; existing plus project conditions or cumulative plus project conditions. Therefore no CO "hot spot" modeling was warranted and no significant long-term air quality impact is anticipated to local air quality with the on-going use of the proposed project. Toxic Air Contaminant Impacts Construction The greatest potential for toxic air contaminant emissions would be related to diesel particulate emissions associated with heavy equipment operations during construction of the proposed project. According to SCAQMD methodology, health effects from carcinogenic air toxics are usually described in terns of "individual cancer risk". "Individual Cancer Risk" is the likelihood that a person exposed to concentrations of toxic air contaminants over a 70 -year lifetime will contract cancer, based on the use of standard risk -assessment methodology. Given the relatively limited number of heavy - Te rtacioa S, ifw Plan Prated 32 ESA 1130294 rinal Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 According to the project applicant, grading activities would require several days where the daily earth -moving volume would exceed 5,000 cubic yards. Therefore, the proposed project's grading activities would be considered a Large Operation as defined in SCAQMD's Rule 403 and subject to the Rule's requirements. The ACRMOD Model was re -run using quantifiable control measures including watering all disturbed areas three Times per day and limiting the speed on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. With mitigation, local PMI O and PM2.5 emissions at the nearest residences fromgrading activities would be reduced to below the 10.4 pg per meter3 threshold of significance. In addition to compliance with Rule 403, Mitigation Measure AIR -2 includes additional measures to further reduce construction emissions. With the implementation of these measures local construction emissions would be reduced to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measure AIR -2: The following measures shall be required during construction: The project applicant shall require that the site preparation and grading contractors implement the fugitive dust control actions provided in SCAQMD's Rule 403 for "Large Operations." If a more restrictive action is included below as project mitigation then that measure may be used in place of the applicable Rule 403 measure. A list of the Large Operations control actions from Rule 403 are provided in Appendix A of this Initial Study. When materials are transported off-site, all material shall be covered. As necessary, it may be effectively wetted to limited dust emissions, and at least six inches of freeboard space from the top of the container shall be maintained to the extent feasible. If warranted by site or weather conditions, material shall be effectively wetted to limit dust emissions. iii. The developer shall require and ensure that the contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering, as necessary, to prevent transport of dust offsite. iv. 'The developer shall post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond to any dust complaints and attempt corrective action within 24 hours. V. The developer shall require and ensure that the contractor or builder shall formulate a high wind response plan for enhanced dust control if winds are forecast to exceed 25 mph in any upcoming 24-hour period. vi. The developer shall use its best efforts to require and ensure that the contractor or builder shall restrict truck operation to "clean" trucks, such as a 2007 or newer model year or 2010 compliant vehicles. vii. The developer shall use its best efforts to utilize GARB certified equipment for construction activities. Developer shall inform all contractors and subcontractors that use of CARR certified equipment for all construction Terracina Specific Plan Project 31 ESA / 130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 Local Air Quality Impacts Construction The local air quality emissions 6.0111 construction were analyzed using the SCAQMD's Mass Rate Localized Significant Threshold (LST) Look -up Tables and the LST Methodology, prepared by SCAQMD, revised July 2008. The LST Methodology found the primary emissions of concern are NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. The on -site emissions were calculated from the CaIEEMod model for the different construction phases and have been detailed above for the construction -related regional air quality impacts analysis. The nearest off-site homes are located as near as 25 feet away from the project site. The screening data provided in Table 8 shows that NOx and CO emissions would not exceed the allowable limits for any phase of construction and that for both the site preparation and grading phases PM10 and PM2.5 emissions may exceed the local emissions thresholds at the nearest sensitive receptors. Thus, further analysis was required for PM10 and PM2.5 TABLES SCREENING OF LOCAL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS AT NEAREST SENSITIVE RECEPTOR On -Site Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day) Phase NO, CO PM1n PM's Site Preparation 74.88 43.05 21.68 13.54 Grading 132.39 68.96 18.13 9.10 Trenching 20.08 16.23 1.26 1.26 Building Construction 29.16 22.98 1.80 1.80 Paving 28.21 20.38 2.35 2.35 Architectural Coating 2.37 1.88 0.20 0.20 SCAQMD Threshold for 25 meters 371 1,965 13 8 (82 feet) or less Significant Impact? No No Yes Yes SOURCE Kunzman Associates, Inc, 2013 (Appendix A). The Air Quality Analysis calculated worst-case PM10 and PM2.5 construction emissions at seven analyzed discrete sensitive receptors, which were chosen as the most likely off- site residences to be impacted from grading emissions and at the point of maximum impact. The Air Quality Analysis shows that PM 10 front the site preparation and grading phases would exceed the local emissions thresholds at Receptor 3, which is located on the south side of the project site (Appendix A). "Therefore, significant local PM 10 concentrations would occur during site preparation and grading activities for the proposed project without mitigation. Terracing Specific Plan Project 30 ESA 1130294 Final Inillel SludylMlllgaled Negative Declaration November 2014 TABLE 6 MITIGATED CONSTRUCTION -RELATED REGIONAL CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS Mitigation Measure AIR -1: All diesel powered construction equipment in use shall require control equipment that Facets, at a Ininimum Tier 3 emission requirements. In the event "Tier 3 equipment is not available, diesel powered construction equipment in use shall require emissions control equipment with mininluro of Tier 2 diesel standards. Operation The worst-case summer or winter VOC, NOS, CO, SO2, l 10, and PM2.5 emissions created front the proposed project's long -terns operations have been calculated and are summarized below in Table 7. Table 7 shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the regional emissions thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from operation of the proposed project. TABLE 7 OPERATIONAL REGIONAL CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS Estimated Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day) Construction Activities VOC NO, CO SO, PM" PMzs Site Preparation 9.49 75AS 44.37 0.07 21.96 13.58 Grading 12.79 85.72 80.48 0.15 17.71 8,34 Trenching 2.90 20.59 17.06 0.03 1.44 1.29 Building Construction 5.74 37.45 37.59 0.07 5.19 2.25 Paving 5.53 28.28 21.16 0.03 2.55 2.36 Architectural Coatings 71.06 2.56 3.97 0.00 0.74 0.14 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No SOURCE'. Kurtzman Associates, Inc, 2013 (Appendix A). Mitigation Measure AIR -1: All diesel powered construction equipment in use shall require control equipment that Facets, at a Ininimum Tier 3 emission requirements. In the event "Tier 3 equipment is not available, diesel powered construction equipment in use shall require emissions control equipment with mininluro of Tier 2 diesel standards. Operation The worst-case summer or winter VOC, NOS, CO, SO2, l 10, and PM2.5 emissions created front the proposed project's long -terns operations have been calculated and are summarized below in Table 7. Table 7 shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the regional emissions thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from operation of the proposed project. TABLE 7 OPERATIONAL REGIONAL CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS Terracina Specific Plan Project 29 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study lditigated Negative Declaration November 2014 Estimated Maximum Daily Emissions (Inds/day) Activity VOC NO, CO SOz PM,, PM2.6 Area Sources 20.64 0.46 39.67 0.00 0.84 0.83 Energy Usage 0.56 4.79 2.04 0.03 0.39 0.39 Mobile Sources 18.04 18.66 210.35 0.38 43.28 2.84 Total Emissions 39.24 23.91 252.06 0.41 44.51 4.06 Regional Significance Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No SOURCE. Kunzman Associates, Inc, 2013 (Appendix A). Terracina Specific Plan Project 29 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study lditigated Negative Declaration November 2014 bid) The following discusses potential impacts from air pollutants, during both the construction and operational phases of the project, and includes a discussion of potential impacts to the nearest sensitive receptors. Criteria Pollutants Analysis Construction Construction emissions estimates were generated using CaIEEMOD Version 2011.1.1. Construction -related criteria pollutant emissions by phase are shown in Table 5. NON would exceed the SCAQMD constructions thresholds during grading activities. Construction emissions were modeled assuming that at least half of all diesel equipment during the grading phase would meet Tier 3 or higher federal emissions standards. As shown in Table 6, this measure would result in criteria pollutant emissions below the SCAQMD threshold. Mitigation AIM is provided which requires that diesel -powered construction equipment meeting "Pier 3 emission requirements be used to the maximum extent feasible. With mitigation, impacts would be less than significant. TABLE 5 UNMITIGATED CONSTRUCTION -RELATED REGIONAL CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS Terraclna Specific Plan Project 28 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 Estimated Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day) Construction Activities VOC NO, CO SO2 PM" Pill Site Preparation 9.49 75,43 44.37 0.07 21.96 13.58 Grading 16.21 132.98 70.71 0.15 18.51 9.14 Trenching 2.90 20.59 17.06 0.03 1.44 1.29 Building Construction 5.74 37.45 37.59 0.07 5.19 2.25 Paving 5.53 28.28 21.16 0.03 2.55 2.36 Architectural Coatings 71.06 2.56 3.97 0.00 0.74 0.14 Regional Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No Yes No No No No SOURCE: Kunzman Associates, Inc, 2013 (Appendix A). Terraclna Specific Plan Project 28 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency: (1) Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. (2) Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP in 2010 or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase. Criterion 1 - Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations With implementation of Mitigation Measures AIR -1, AIR -2 and AIR -3, discussed below, short-term construction impacts will not result in significant impacts based on the SCAQMD regional and local thresholds of significance. The Air Quality Impact Analysis also found that long-term operations impacts will not result in significant impacts based on the SCAQMD regional, local and toxic air contaminant thresholds of significance. Therefore, the proposed project is not projected to contribute to the exceedance of any air pollutant concentration standards and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the First criterion. Criterion 2 - Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP In preparation of the AQMP, SCAQMD and the Southern California Association of Governments use land use designations contained in General Plan documents to forecast, inventory, and allocate regional emissions train land use and development -related sources. For purposes of analyzing consistency with the AQMP, if a proposed project would have a development density that is substantially greater than what was anticipated in the General Plan, then the proposed project would conflict with the AQMP. On the other hand, if a project's density is consistent with the General Plan, its emissions would be consistent with the assumptions in the AQMP, and the project would not conflict with SCAQMD's attainment plans. The project site is currently zoned R-1 and designated as both Low -Medium Residential and Low Density Residential in the General Plan. The Low Density Residential designation comprises 27 acres and has a maximum allowed density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre. The Low -Medium Density Residential designation comprises 124 acres and has a maximum allowed density of 6.0 dwelling units per acre. Thus, the existing general plan would allow for up to 825 dwelling units. As the project proposes 468 units, it is not anticipated to exceed the AQMP assumptions for the project site and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the second criterion. Conclusion Based on the above criteria, the proposed project will not result in an inconsistency with the SCAQMD AQMP. Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur. rer_.___......_ESA 1130294 racina Sped(Ic Plan Pmjeq Q] Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 TABLE 4 ATTAINMENT STATUS OF SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN (RIVERSIDE COUNTY PORTION) Designation/Classification Pollutant Federal Standards State Standards Ozone — one hour No Federal Standard Nonattainment/Extreme Ozone — eight hour Nonattainment/Extreme Nonattainment PM10 Nonattainment/Serious Nonattainment PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainment CO Attainment/Maintenance Maintenance Nitrogen Dioxide Attainment/Maintenance Attainment Sulfur Dioxide Unclassified/Attainment Attainment Lead Unclassified/Attainment Attainment SOURCE. ARB, 2013 Local SCAQMD The SCAQMD is the agency principally responsible for comprehensive air pollution control in the South Coast Air Basin. It has prepared a sequence of Air Quality Management Plans (AQMPs). The 2007 AQMP demonstrated attainment with the 1997 8 -hour ozone (80 ppb) standard by 2023, through implementation of future improvements in control techniques and technologies. These "black box" emissions reductions represent 65 percent of the remaining NOx emission reductions by 2023 in order to show attainment with the 1997 8 -hour ozone NAAQS. Given the magnitude of these needed emissions reductions, additional NOx control measures have been provided in the AQMP even though the primary purpose of the AQMP is to show compliance with 24-hour PM2.5 emissions standards. The 2012 AQMP updates and revises the previous 2007 AQMP. A revised draft of the 2012 AQMP was released on September 2012, and was adopted by the SCAQMD Board on December 7, 2012. The 2012 AQMP is now awaiting approval from CARB and the U.S. EPA. The 2012 AQMP is being prepared in order to meet the federal Clean Air Act requirement that all 24-hour PM2.5 non -attainment areas prepare a SIP, which was required to be submitted to the U.S. EPA by December 14, 2012 and demonstrate attainment with the 24-hour PM2.5 standard by 2014. The 2012 AQMP demonstrates attainment of the federal 24-110l Pli standard by 2014 in the Basin through adoption of all feasible measures, and therefore, no extension of the attainment date is needed. Impact Analysis a) The AQMP is the regional air quality plan that applies to the proposed project. A proposed project should be considered to be consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one Terrac na Specific Plan Project 26 ESA 1130234 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 TABLE 3 NATIONAL AND STATE AIR QUALITY STANDARDS State California Air Resources Board The California Air Resources Board (GARB), which is a part of the California Environmental Protection Agency, is responsible for the coordination and administration of both federal and state air pollution control programs within California. The California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) for criteria pollutants are shown in ']'able 3 and the state attainment status for the Riverside County portion of the South Coast Air Basin is shown in 'fable 4. The South Coast Air Basin has been designated by CARB as a nonattainmew area for ozone, PM 10 and PM2.5. Terracina Specific Plan ProteO 25 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative neClaration November 2014 State National Pollutant Averaging Time Standard Standard Pollutant Health and Atmospheric Effects Ozone 1 hour 0.09 ppm --- High concentrations can directly affect lungs, 8 hours 0.07 ppm 0.075 ppm causing irritation. Long-term exposure may cause damage to lung tissue. Carbon 1 hour 20 ppm 35 ppm Classified as a chemical asphyxiant, carbon Monoxide (CO) 8 hours 9 0m pp g Pan monoxide interferes with the transfer of fresh oxygen to the blood and deprives sensitive tissues of oxygen. Nitrogen 1 hour 0.18 ppm 100 ppb Irritating to eyes and respiratory tract. Colors Dioxide (NOe) Annual Arithmetic Mean 0.030 ppm 0.053 ppm atmosphere reddish -brown, Sulfur 1 hour 0.25 ppm 75 ppb Irritates upper respiratory tract, injurious to lung Dioxide (SO2) 3 hours tissue. Can yellow the leaves of plants, 0.50 ppm destructive to marble, iron, and steel. Limits 24 hours 0.04 ppm 0.14 ppm visibility and reduces sunlight. Annual Arithmetic Mean --- 0.03 ppm Respirable 24 hours 50 fl 150 pg/m' May irritate eyes and respiratory tract, ParticuMatter late Annual Arithmetic Mean 20 decreases in lung capacity, cancer and pg/m' --- increased mortality. Produces haze and limits (PMib) visibility. Fine 24 hours --- 35 pg/m' Increases respiratory disease, lung damage, Particulate Annual Arithmetic Mean 12 /m' 15 /m' cancer, and premature death. Reduces visibility Matter pg P9 and results in surface soiling. (PM2.5) Lead (Pb) 30 Day Average 1.5 hi --- Disturbs gastrointestinal system, and causes Calendar Quarter --- 1.5 pg/m anemia, kidney disease, and neuromuscular and neurological dysfunction (in severe cases). Rolling 3 -Month Average --- 0.15 pg/m' Sulfates (SO4) 24 hour 25 pg/m' No National Decrease in ventilatory functions; aggravation Standard of asthmatic symptoms; aggravation of cardio- pulmonary disease; vegetation damage, degradation of visibility; property damage. Visibility 8 hour Extinction of No National Reduces visibility, reduced airport safety, lower Reducing 0.23/km; Standard real estate value, and discourages tourism. Particles visibility of 10 miles or more SOURCE: ARB, 2012 State California Air Resources Board The California Air Resources Board (GARB), which is a part of the California Environmental Protection Agency, is responsible for the coordination and administration of both federal and state air pollution control programs within California. The California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) for criteria pollutants are shown in ']'able 3 and the state attainment status for the Riverside County portion of the South Coast Air Basin is shown in 'fable 4. The South Coast Air Basin has been designated by CARB as a nonattainmew area for ozone, PM 10 and PM2.5. Terracina Specific Plan ProteO 25 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative neClaration November 2014 Air Quality Less Than Significant Potentially wifh Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 3. AIRQUALITY — Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute it ® ❑ ❑ substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of El E ® ❑ any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant El ® ❑ it concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ❑ ❑ ® L1 number of people? Discussion An Air Quality and Global Climate Change hupact Analysis (Kunzlnan Associates, Inc., 20 13) was prepared to analyze the potential impacts to air quality resulting from the proposed project and was used in the preparation of this section. The project site is located within the western portion of Riverside County, which is part of the South Coast Air Basin (Basin) that includes all of Orange County as well as the non -desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. The project site is within the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Regulatory Setting Federal United States Environmental Protection Agency The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for setting and enforcing the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)'for atmospheric pollutants. It regulates emission sources that are under the exclusive authority of the federal government, such as aircraft, ships, and certain locomotives. NAAQS pollutants are shown below in Table 3. As part of its enforcement responsibilities, the EPA requires each state with federal nonattainment areas to prepare and submit a State Implementation Plan (SIP) that demonstrates the means to attain the national standards. As indicated below in Table 4, the Basin has been designated by the EPA as a non -attainment area for ozone (03) and suspended particulates (PM 10 and PM2.5). Terracina Specific c Pla r Project 24 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Dergan on November 2014 side garage entrances. Both types of lighting are consistent with lighting in residential neighborhoods. Parking lighting in the multi -family residential potion of the project must be located and designed to avoid light shining onto adjacent properties or into the sky (Section 17.148.110). With conformance to the City's lighting standards the impact on nighttime lighting would be less than significant. !Agricultural and Forest Resources Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 2. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or El L1 El Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ❑ ❑ Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning ❑ ❑ 0 of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment El El which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Discussion a -e) The project site is not utilized for agricultural cultivation, is not under a Williamson Contract (California Department of Conservation, 2O12a) and is not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance (California Department of Conservation, 2O12b). The project site does not contain forested land. The project site has been designated for single-family residential development under the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan (2011). Additionally, land adjacent to the project site does not contain agricultural or forest resources. As the project site does not contain agricultural or forest resources and would not result in the conversion of off-site agricultural or forest resources, there would be no impact for this issue area. Terraalna Specific Plan Pedlect 23 ESA / 130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 Environmental Checklist Aesthetics Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 1. AESTHETICS— Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? El D b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, 1-1 El ❑ but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ® ❑ quality of the site and its surroundings? J) Create a new source of substantial light or glare ® ❑ which would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area? Discussion a) Scenic resources in the City of Lake Elsinore and surrounding area include the lake, the Santa Ana Mountains, Cleveland National Forest, other natural landscapes and buildings of historical/cultural significance. The lake is located south of the project site and is not currently visible from private residences to the east and west of the project site or roadways adjacent to the project site, thus the project would not alter existing views of the lake. The Santa Ana Mountains and Cleveland National Forest are located south, southwest and west of the project site and the project site would not affect off-site views of these areas. For these reasons impacts were determined to be less than significant. b) There are no officially designated state scenic highways in the vicinity of the project site (Caltrans, 2013) and therefore there would be no impact to scenic resources visible from a state scenic highway. C) The proposed project would alter the visual character of the project site which is currently undeveloped. The development of a residential community on the project site would be visually consistent with existing residential development to the east, south and west. The project proposes to preserve the visually appealing natural open space of the prominent knoll feature in the southern portion of the project site. The Specific Plan includes architectural and landscape guidelines as well as the incorporation of open space to enhance the visual character of the development. Open space, graded slopes and parks and recreation areas comprise approximately 52 acres or 34 percent of the project. For these reasons impacts were determined to be less than significant. d) The proposed project would be a new source of nighttime lighting. The project would provide two different types of lighting. The streets would be illuminated by street lights in accordance with the City of Lake Elsinore requirements for street lighting. The second type of lighting will be individual lighting for residential structures for front porch and Terracina Specific Plan Project 22 ESA 1130294 Final Initial SkicylMiligaled Negative Declaration November 2014 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The proposed project could potentially affect the environmental factor(s) checked below. With mitigation, effects to these resources would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. The following pages present a more detailed checklist and discussion of each environmental factor. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture and Forestry Resources ® Air Quality ® Biological Resources ® Cultural Resources ❑ Geology, Soils and Seismicity ® Greenhouse Gas Emissions ❑ Hazards and Hazardous Materials ❑ Hydrology and Water Quality ❑ Land Use and Land Use Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ® Noise ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ® Transportation and Traffic ❑ Utilities and Service Systems ® Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial study: ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact' or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have beef) analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, no further environmental documentation is required. Signature Richard J. MacHott Printed Name November 20, 2014 Date For Terracing Specific Plan Project 21 11130294 Foal Initial StudylMitigatetl Negative Declaration November 2014 �� I i \ � � N ■ ct g ) \ d y\\m [un _ m Cd PI \ ¢ Q � \ g f 5aaa ) \\� Q / a \ƒ// I I 12 m F9 r4 9 x mLf)a) a o� U N 7 Cl) Q N Z LL od A. v C-1 ro O :ty iD u] w0 00 •y r"" Cl � U � � � x � rl o s♦ 4♦ a 4 4 a 4 4 yr r �'� � �'f •t,. UWP d ,�MdP 2��Y � a �.. p py d a kY✓ e N � F o w pia+ U V O N §\{ %2 } / \/ } tAE � E Amr � / � a e \ - y f 4 6 y Q sE)g! »2�%« k \)\\E4 a ,p N Nin � O o 3 m Yi U t' W o N Q N ti C •� u N moi. V y N <7' '? 03 �+' m '.W t, bo a p m OSOD o •y 'C �i � F 'eC 9 eV N R, G •Q ~ 8i Q a a a a a a a a a a a a a Y t ��a a 4 \y 1 N to 1 y. N �.7 n � i°VFS b o z w § § tu .zrq i 4 `J\ 4 \\\ \/\ 4 ) & Jz ® 2 )/\ \ 0 /}ff tu .zrq i 4 `J\ 4 LI �. . Jim .i Ary 6 I r q t ; L33&6 14.9V7 int �I ,✓�r� lI L33DlgA3711%8 Il `t t Il would be used for connections to water service. The site would have a looped water system to help meet domestic water pressure and fire -flow pressure requirements. For wastewater, a lift station would be located on site and would be maintained by EVMWD. Wastewater flows from the protect site would be collected and would be conveyed to the existing 10 -inch sewer line on Lakeshore Drive. Gas would be provided by Southern California Gas Company and electricity by Southern California Edison Company. There are existing gas and electric lines along Terra Cotta Road, Lakeshore Drive, Dryden Street, Stoddard Street and Arnold Avenue which would be used for connections to service. Grading and Construction. Grading could begin as early as Spring 2015. The existing knoll would be largely maintained by designing a road around the sides to the top with grading on the top of the lorot]. The dirt from this area would be used in other portions of the site. The site is proposed to be balanced with no import or export of fill needed. Following rough grading, drainage, utility and street improvements would begin, followed by home construction. The project would be phased with development of two to three villages at a time. The phasing sequence may be adjusted based on market conditions. According to this schedule, construction could be completed by Spring 2019. Construction of residences and other structures would adhere to the California Building Code, in effect at the time, as amended by Chapter 15 of the City Municipal Code. Lead Agency Approvals. The following City approvals and permits are anticipated: • Adoption of the Terracina Specific Plan • Zoning change from R-1 (Single Family Residential) to Specific Plan • Approval of Tentative Tract Map 36557 • Approval of Tentative Tract Map 36577 for financing purposes • Lake Elsinore Mass Grading Permit • Lake Elsinore Residential Design Review for Model Homes and Production Homes It Lake Elsinore Precise Grading and Building Permits • Lake Elsinore Encroachment Permits for Street Improvements (Sewer/Water/Storm Drain/Flood Control/C&G/Utilities/Streets) 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Land uses surrounding the protect area consist of the Pacific Clay mining property and scattered residences to the north, open space and residences to the east, Lakeshore Drive and Dryden Street followed by residences to the south, and Terra Cotta Road followed by residences to the west. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required: Implementation of the project may require the following discretionary approvals by other responsible and/or regulatory agencies: • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit • California Department of Fish and Wildlife Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Permit • Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board Section 401 Water Quality Certification • State Water Resources Control Board Construction Storm Water Runoff permit and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Terracina Specific Plan Project 6 ESA / 130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 TABLE 2 RESIDENTIAL USE SUMMARY Village Acreage Maximum Density Allowed (dui Proposed No. of Lots per Specific Plan Minimum Lot Size (square feet) 1 29.9 2.5 72 6,000 2 20.4 4.5 84 5,500 3 20.9 4.5 91 5,000 4 18.0 5.0 89 4,500 5 17.8 5.5 94 4,500 6 7.8 5.5 38 4,500 Total 468 SOURCE: Spectrum Communities, 2014. Outside of the village areas, the project site incorporates a natural biological area and open space. The biological area would be avoided. Open space areas if disturbed by grading would be revegetated or prepared as fuel modification areas. Circulation Improvements. Circulation improvements include completion of improvements on the north side of Lakeshore Drive, and completion of improvements to Dryden Street and Stoddard Street to provide full -width access to the project site. For the Dolbeer Street, Hoff Avenue and Pierce Street rights-of-way, where there are no existing improvements, the project proposes half -width improvements. To facilitate circulation, Hoff Avenue will be extended westerly to Terra Cotta Road, a 90 -foot right-of-way and Secondary Highway under the City's General Plan. Terra Cotta Road is partially improved from Lakeshore Drive to the northerly boundary of the project site. Full -width improvements to Terra Cotta Road would be constructed within the project site and an additional two lanes would be constructed offsite for approximately one-half mile to Nichols Road. Other interior streets would have 50 -foot rights-of-way with 40 - foot curb -to -curb roadway widths. All roadways would be dedicated to the City with the exception of the internal roadway in Village 6. Drainage, The project would include storm drain system and convey a majority of runoff through a network of underground pipes which release into three separate drainage areas (an infiltration basin and two extended detention/water quality basins). Basins would be located in Villages 1, 5 and 6. An array of Low Impact Development Best Management Practices would be deployed based on feasibility specific to the project site. A preliminary Water Quality Management Plan with proposed treatment controls is included as Appendix B. Public Utilities. Water and wastewater service would be provided by the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). EVMWD previously constructed a water line, fire hydrants and other appurtenance onsite; however, these do not match the currently proposed street design and will likely Have to be relocated. Thee are existing 8 -inch and 30- inch water lines along Lakeshore Drive, Terra Cotta Road, Dryden Street, Stoddard Street and Swan Avenue which 'I'erraolna Specific Plan Project 5 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 An Initial Study was circulated along with a Notice of Intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration on September 27, 2013 (SCH # 2013091083) for a 30 -day review period. Six comment letters were received from state and local agencies, Native American tribes, and interested parties. These original comment letters are included in Appendix I of this Initial Study. Proposed Project The Terracina Specific Plan Project (hereafter referred to as project or proposed project) consists of a 150.8 -acre residential development. A summary of acreages is provided as Table 1. TABLE 1 LAND USE SUMMARY Description Acreage Residential 76.5 Open Space 22.0 Roadways 22.5 Park 1.6 Graded Slopes and Basins 28.2 Total 150.8 SOURCE', Spectrum Communities, 2014. A total of 468 single-family lots comprise the Tentative Tract Map (TTM 36557) as shown in Figure 2. Figure 3 shows the proposed financing neap (TTM 36577). The Specific Plan for the project divides the project site into six residential planning areas, or villages (Figure 4). Each village would have a unique identity by varying architectural styles and lot sizes (Figures 5a through Sj). Village 1 would contain the largest lot and home product size, oriented to capitalize on views of the surrounding terrain, the Elsinore Mountains, or Lake Elsinore. This village is designated Low Density Residential with a maximum density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and a maximum yield of 75 lots. The minimum lot size would be 6,000 square feet. Village 2 is designated Low Medium Density Residential with a maximum density of 4.5 du/ac and a maximum yield of 91 lots. The minimum lot size in Village 2 would be 5,500 square feet. Village 3 is similar in density to Village 2 with 4.5 du/ac; however, the minimum lot size would be 5,000 square feet. Village 3 would yield a maximum of 94 lots. Village 3 contains the main 1.6 -acre (net) park for use by all residents of the development. Village 4 is located in the eastern portion of the project and is designated Low Medium Density Residential with a maximum density of 5.0 du/ac and a maximum yield of 90 lots. The mininwm lot size would be 4,500 square feet. Village 5 is designated Low Medium Density Residential and includes a water quality/detention basin. The proposed density is 5.5 du/ac, for a maxiolmn yield of 98 lots containing single-family detached homes. The minimum lot size would be 4,500 square feet. Village 6 is similar in density and lot size as Village 5 with a proposed density of 5.5 du/ac, for a maximum yield of 43 lots with single-family detached homes and a minimum lot size of 4,500 square feet. Table 2 is a summary of each village. Terracina Specific Plan Project 4 ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 SOURCE: David Jeffers Consulting Inc., 2012 Terracina Specific Plan Project IS/MND . 130294 Figure 1 Regional Location 15 m FFr T N A, NOT TO SCALE `s ROAD TERRA COTTA RD. CO�li (EXTENDED) FF ILL! FP FFGy Y 9G�2 Project Site GF 15 Off. (� SFS 74 y0�'F p,NERS�`JE LINCOLN J� FFr OF��'F o��oo LAKE �Q- ELSINORE RECREATION �- AREA G� 74 bo LAKE R(,F� ELSINORE �F SOURCE: David Jeffers Consulting Inc., 2012 Terracina Specific Plan Project IS/MND . 130294 Figure 1 Regional Location Use of the Final IS/MND and the CEQA Process AS required by Section 15073(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, the initial Draft IS/MND was available for a 30 -day public review and comment period fi-om September 27 2013 through October 28 2013 A subsequent Draft IS/MND was recirculated for public review from October 16 2014 through November 17 2014 Comments received on the initial Draft IS/MND can be found in Appendix I of the Final IS/MND. Comments on the recirculated Draft IS/MND and lead agency responses to these comments are included in the City Community Development Depailment's staff report on the project Subsequent revisions and/or corrections to the recirculated Draft IS/MND resulting finom these comments are shown in strikeout/underline text in this Final IS/MND. The Final IS/MND serves as the environmental document to support approval of the proposed project either in whole or in part if the project is approved After cop feting the Final IS/MND and before approving the project the decisionmaking body of the lead agency must make the following considerations. as required by Section 15074(b) of the CEQA Guidelines: "Prior to approving the proiects the decisionmaking body of the lead aWeirc sy hall consider the proposed negative declaration or miligaled negative declaration together with anv comments received durhLithe lie public review process. The decisionmaking body shall adopt the 121 )osed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration only itit finds on the basis ofthe whole record before it (including the initial studv and arty comments received) that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the negative declaration or mitigated nevative declaration reflects the lead azencv's independent iudement and anal sy is. Terracing Specific Plan Protect 2 ESA / 130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Initial Study - Recirculated 1. Project Title: 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Terracina Specific Plan Project SCH 42013091083 City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Richard MacHott, Planning Manager (951) 674-3124 Ext 209 4. Project Location: The project is located in the northwestern portion of the City of Lake Elsinore, in western Riverside County. The project site contains 150.8 acres within the Alberhill District of the City and corresponds to the following eight Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 378-040-004 through 007, 378-040-012,389-180-001 and 002, and 389-190-002. A regional location map is shown as Figure 1. The northern project site boundary is located 0.8 miles southwest of Interstate 15. 'file southern project boundary is located adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street. Hoff Avenue is located along the northern boundary. The project site is vacant and contains gently rolling hills and a knoll in the western portion near Lakeshore Drive. 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Spectrum Communities 5753 G. Santa Ana Canyon Road, Suite 507 Anaheim Hills, CA 92807 6. General Plan Designation(s): 7. Zoning Designation(s): 8. Description of Project: Background Low Density Residential, Low -Medium Residential Single -Family Residential (R-1) Under the previous owner, Centex Homes, the project site received approval for Tentative Tract Map 32786 on October 11, 2005. The plan included 369 single-family lots with a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet. Final improvement plans were created but were not issued permits and there has been no improvement to the site with the exception of a portion of a water line constructed by the Elsinore Valley Water District in the central portion of the site. The project site was subsequently purchased by Spectrum Communities in May 2012. Terracina Specific Plan Project 1 ESA 1130294 goal Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Godaration November 2014 Table of Contents Paqe Appendix H — Cultural Resources Addendum Report — CONFIDENTIAL — NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Appendix I — NOI and Comment Letters on MND circulated Sept. 27, 2013 Figures Figure 1 Regional Location................................................................................................3 Figure 2 Tentative Tract Map 36557..................................................................................7 Figure3 Financing Map 36577..........................................................................................8 Figure 4 Proposed Land Uses and Villages.......................................................................9 26 Figure 5a Proposed Architectural Styles............................................................................11 Figure 5b Proposed Architectural Styles............................................................................12 Figure 5c Proposed Architectural Styles............................................................................13 Figure 5d Proposed Architectural Styles.... .................................. ...... ...................... ..... _14 Figure 5e Proposed Architectural Styles............................................................................15 Figure 5f Proposed Architectural Styles............................................................................16 Figure 5g Proposed Architectural Styles............................................................................17 Figure 5h Proposed Architectural Styles............................................................................18 Figure 5i Proposed Architectural Styles............................................................................19 Figure 5j Proposed Architectural Styles............................................................................20 Tables Table1 Land Use Summary.............................................................................................4 Table 2 Residential Use Summary ...................................................................................5 Table 3 National and State Air Quality Standards..........................................................25 Table 4 Attainment Status of South Coast Air Basin (Riverside County portion) ............ 26 Table 5 Unmitigated construction -related regional criteria pollutant emissions ..............28 Table 6 Mitigated Construction -Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions..............29 Table 7 Operational Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions............................................29 Table 8 Screening of Local Construction Emissions at Nearest Sensitive Receptor...... 30 Table 9 Project -related Greenhouse Gas Emissions......................................................53 Table 10 Clean Water Act Section 303(d) Impaired Water Bodies...................................59 Table 11 Existing and Modeled with Project Stormwater Discharges...............................62 Table 12 Predicted Future Roadway Noise Levels...........................................................69 Table 13 Existing School Capacity...................................................................................74 Table 14 Project Student Generation...............................................................................74 Table 15 Project Trip Generation Estimates.....................................................................78 Table 16 Intersection Level of Service — Existing and Cumulative Plus Project ...............80 'I am.a ina Specific Plan Protect ESA 1130294 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Terracina Specific Plan Project Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Paqe InitialStudy............................................................................................................................1 Use of the Final IS/MND and the CEQA Process..................................................................2 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected..........................................................................21 EnvironmentalChecklist.......................................................................................................22 Aesthetics......................................................................................................................22 Agricultural and Forest Resources.................................................................................23 AirQuality......................................................................................................................24 BiologicalResources.....................................................................................................34 CulturalResources........................................................................................................44 Geology, Soils, and Seismicity.......................................................................................49 Greenhouse Gas Emissions..........................................................................................50 Hazards and Hazardous Materials.................................................................................54 Hydrologyand Water Quality.........................................................................................57 Land Use and Land Use Planning.................................................................................63 MineralResources.........................................................................................................64 Noise..............................................................................................................................64 Populationand Housing.................................................................................................71 PublicServices..............................................................................................................72 Recreation...................................................................................................................... 75 Transportationand Traffic..............................................................................................76 Utilities and Service Systems.........................................................................................83 Mandatory Findings of Significance...............................................................................85 References........................................................................................................................... 86 Appendices Appendix A — Air Quality and Global Climate Change Impact Analysis Appendix B — Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan Appendix C — Preliminary Hydrology Analysis, Volumes 1-3 Appendix D — Noise Impact Analysis Appendix E — Traffic Impact Analysis Appendix F — Biological Technical Report Appendix G — Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation Analysis Terraclna Specific Plan Project ESA / 130204 Final Initial StLay/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2014 OUR COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY I ESA helps a variety of public and private sector clients plan antl prepare for climate change and emerging regulations that limit GHG enhissions. ESA Is a registered assessor with the California Climate Action Registry, e Climate Leader, and founding reporter for the Climate Registry. ESA is also a corporate member of the U.S. Green Building Council and the Business Council on Climate Change (BC3). Internally, ESA has adopted a Sustainability Vision antl Policy Statement and a plan to reduce waste and anergy within our operations. This document was produced using recycled paper. TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared for City of Lake Elsinore 550 West 0 Street Suite 750 San Diego, CA 92101 619.719.4200 w .ssassoc.com Los Angeles Oaldand Orlando Palm Springs Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills 130294 November 2014 ESA. TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared for City of Lake Elsinore November 2014 it x 1 h I 1 A ladV i 9 V IX. APPENDIX TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN VIII. FINANCING OPTIONS Developers are also sometimes provided refunds and reimbursements by utility companies when the developer constructs backbone infrastructure which will ultimately serve more than just the developer's project. VIII -3 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN VIII. FINANCING OPTIONS C. Builder Funding Builders typically finance almost all of the design and construction components of their project with the possibility of some credits and/or reimbursements after the item has been constructed. The following list represents design and construction costs through grading and improvements, but does not include any costs associated with construction of the home itself. 1. Design Costs: (excluding home buildings) • Tentative Tract map • Tentative Parcel Map • Cost/Analysis Construction • Specific Plan • Resource/environmental Studies • Preliminary WQMP • Grading Plans • Street Plans • Sewer Plans • Storm Drain Plans • Hydrology/hydraulic Studies • Water Plans • Landscape Plans • Utility Plans (e.g. gas, electric, TV, etc.) • Final Map (Tract Map and Parcel Map) • Survey Plans 2. Construction Costs: • Survey Staking • Grading • Street improvements • Sewer improvements • Storm drain improvements • Water improvements • Landscaping • Amenities: Parks, Recreation Centers • Water Quality Basin improvements • Traffic signals (on-site and off-site) 3. Potential Credits and/or Reimbursements Developers become eligible for credits and/or reimbursements when certain improvements are constructed within or in association with the project provided those improvements being constructed are shown on Master Plans of the jurisdiction and serve more than the project. VIII -2 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN VIII. FINANCING OPTIONS VIII. FINANCING OPTIONS Financing is a critical component to the success of any development. Without viable funding mechanisms projects would not get built. This section will discuss options to be considered by the City and developer of Terracina so that Terracina is built per the guidelines, regulations and quality suggested by this Specific Plan. A. Special Assessment Districts Assessment districts are usually formed by utility companies or agencies to fund either new capitol public improvements within their system or to fund short -falls in certain improvement areas of the district Assessment districts are usually formed for a specific area of benefit (AOB) either the district as a whole or a sub -section of the district. There are two main acts which allow for the formation of assessment districts: the Improvement Act of 1911 and the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. Both can be used for public improvements. The Improvement Bond Act of 1915 is typically used with the acts for the issuance of bonds to finance the improvements. Assessment districts are typically formed based on a vote of all landowners who will benefit form the public improvement. Landowners consent to the forming of the district, its purpose, the improvement, the cost of the improvement and to be taxed on an annual basis for re- payment of the bonds. This method of funding a developer's public improvements is not the most likely as he or his entity will be paying for the improvements anyway as required by the City. B. Mello -Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) The Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 allows the City, special district, school district or county to form a district to finance public improvements and services. CFD's are usually formed in undeveloped areas where new homes are proposed. The CFD is created by a sponsoring local government agency for the developer. Municipal bonds in the amount to design, build and maintain the public improvements will be sold and re -paid over a specified period of time by the future home buyers of the project. The homeowners will be taxed on a yearly basis for a period of time needed to re -pay the bonds. A Mello -Roos CFD disclosure is required to be signed by all homebuyers within the project acknowledging that they are aware of this payment responsibility. VIII -1 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN VII. IMPLEMENTATION • Changes to density or intensity of the project as a whole or individually of any village; • Changes to any previous approval provided by this Specific Plan; • Major changes to the alignment of General Plan roadways; • Changes that would jeopardize the Specific Plan's consistency with the City's General Plan or any ordinance or code; • Major changes to any utility which affects the intensity or density of development. • Significant changes to the natural open space and biologically sensitive areas of the site; • Changes which affect any mitigation measures associated with the environmental studies for the project; • Any changes to project Conditions of Approval. Minor amendments should not be inconsistent with the intent and character of the Specific Plan and may include: • Modifications to the shape of village boundaries; • Modifications to acreages of villages such that the modification does not alter the total area by more than 10%; • Modifications to amenities provided in the recreation centers of the project; • Any changes in the landscape palette selections for various areas of the project; • Modifications to street alignments provided the modification is merely an adjustment and does not affect the intensity or density of adjacent planning areas; • Any aesthetic change that complies with the intended character of Terracina. TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN VII. IMPLEMENTATION VII. IMPLEMENTATION All future development applications (e.g. Tentative Maps, Vesting Tentative Maps, Final Maps, grading permits, building permits, etc.) are required to be approved by the City of Lake Elsinore based on City ordinances and various codes applicable to land development. A. Administrative Review Process The Terracina project is a standard master planned residential development with associated amenities and should be processed as such through the City of Lake Elsinore. Terracina Specific Plan does not intend to modify, alter or amend any of the various application review procedures currently established by the City of Lake Elsinore under its various submittal requirements, applications and/or codes. B. Phasing and Scheduling The Terracina project, due to its mere size and number and variety of residential product proposed, cannot be built all at the same time. Therefore, a phased pattern of development is proposed. The phasing of development must be flexible to meet market demands and sequences of infrastructure construction. Certain development considerations are important in determining appropriate and sequential phasing: access, sewer service, storm drain service, domestic water availability, market product demand and others. Each of these will be addressed by the project builder in the determination of sequencing or phasing. C. Amendments to the Specific Plan California Government Code Section 65453 states that a specific plan shall be prepared, adopted and amended in the same manner as a general plan, except that a specific plan may be adopted by resolution or by ordinance and may be amended as often as deemed necessary by the City. Amendments to this Specific Plan can be major or minor. Major amendments must be approved by the City Council and minor amendments are administrative and can be approved at a staff level by the Community Development Director. Major amendments include: • Changes to increase the maximum dwelling units allowed; • Changes to the Development Regulations; TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN VI. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Any cul-de-sac or knuckle lot having a minimum width of 57 feet (measured at the mid- point of the lot) shall have a minimum depth of 75 feet. Lot coverage. The maximum lot coverage of all structures in the R-1 district shall be 50 percent. Building height. Except as otherwise provided for accessory structures, the maximum building height in the R-1 district shall be 35 feet. In the case of split levels, no continuous vertical section through the building shall measure more than 35 feet. Minimum dwelling unit size. The minimum dwelling unit size within the R-1 district shall be 1,000 square feet exclusive of garage area. Parking. The provisions of Chapter 17.148 LEMC shall be used to determine the required parking for each Village in the R-1 District. Signs. The provisions of Chapter 17.196 LEMC shall be used to determine permitted signs in the R-1 district. Design review No building permits shall be issued for the construction of any building or structure in the R-1 district until the applicant has obtained design review from Planning Commission approval pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.184 LEMC, Design Review. The following exemptions shall apply: A. Additions or alterations to an existing structure which do not change the use from one permitted in the district and which do not increase the floor area by more than 50 percent. B. Groups I, Il, and IV accessory structures C. Fences and walls. Although the above exempted structures do not need formal design review approval, their proposed location and design must be approved by the Director of Community Development or his designee prior to construction or installation. TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN VI. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS A. Front Yard, 1. Main dwelling unit: 10 feet. 2. Garage: 18 feet; provided, however, that turn -in entry garages may encroach to within 15 feet of the front property line. Automatic garage door openers shall be required for front -entry garages with less than a 18 -foot setback; but in no case shall the garage door be less than 15 feet. B. Side Yard. 1. Main dwelling unit: Adjacent to interior lot lines there shall be a minimum side yard of 5 feet. Adjacent to a public right-of-way the minimum side yard shall be 10 feet. 2. Accessory structures: In the rear one-half of the lot, as specified in LEMC 17.76.040, otherwise the same as required for the main dwelling unit with the exception that where straight -in entry garage gains access via the side yard, the setback shall be 18 feet. C. Rear Yard. 1. Main dwelling unit: 15 feet. 2. Accessory structures: As specified in LEMC17.76.040, with the exception that where straight -in entry garage gains access via the rear yard, the setback shall be 18 feet. 3. Finished slopes in excess of 5 feet in height shall not be permitted within 10 feet of the rear of the main dwelling unit. 4. Rear yard patio covers may encroach a minimum of 10 feet into the required yard setback. Lot depth: The minimum lot depth for any new lot created in the R-1 district shall be as follows: A. Standard interior lots: Village 1 90 feet Village 2 : 90 feet Village 3 90 feet Village 4,5,&6 : 90 feet B. Cul-de-sac and knuckle lots Village 1 85 feet Village 2 85 feet Village 3 85 feet Village 4,5,&6 : 85 feet TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN VI. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS B. Exception. Whenever a lot is adjacent to a lower density zoning district or to an existing developed parcel with a larger lot size than required in the R-1 district, a transition or buffer shall be provided between the adjacent property and a new subdivision, which may include, but is not limited to, lot size, lot width, lot depth, increased setbacks, or slopes. The purpose of this transition shall be to minimize the disparity between different densities of development. The adequacy of this transition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director on a case-by-case basis. C. In the implementation of subsection (C) of this section, any change in a lot size which would leave the lot at a size at least 75 percent the size of the largest adjacent developed lot will be presumed appropriate, absent unusual circumstances. Any application to change a lot to a size lower than said 75 percent standard will be permitted only upon a showing of good cause. It is the intent of this subsection to set a standard but also to allow flexibility. Street frontage width. The minimum street frontage width for any new lot created in the R-1 district shall be as follows: A. Standard interior lots: Village 1 : 60 feet Village 2 : 50 feet Village 3 50 feet Village 4,5,&6 : 40 feet B. Corner lots: Village 1 65 feet Village 2 : 55 feet Village 3 : 55 feet Village 4,5,&6 : 45 feet C. Knuckle or cul-de-sac lots: 35 feet; measured at the building setback line provided the average width is equal to the standard minimum width measured at the mid -point of an arbitrary bisecting line of the lot depth. D. Flag lots: 15 feet; provided the average width of the principal portion of the lot is 50 feet. E. Extra depth lots: the minimum width of any lot in the R-1 District may be measured 40 feet from the front property line provided that the lot has a minimum depth of 120 feet measured through the center of the lot. This provision is provided to promote varying building set back along the street. Setbacks. The following minimum setbacks shall apply to all new construction within the R-1 district: VI - 4 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN VI. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 3. Keeping of household pets (when no commercial activity is involved). For the purpose of this chapter, a household pet is an animal clearly considered customary to a residential use, e.g., dogs, cats, birds, and fish. Said pets shall be limited to a maximum of two weaned dogs and two cats. Birds shall be permitted only inside the main dwelling unit, unless a use permit is obtained by the Planning Commission. B. Structures. 1. Group I. Sheds, children's playhouses, and similar enclosures of less than 120 square feet provided they do not exceed a maximum height of six and one-half feet above the pad or yard elevation of the main structure or home. Such structures may be located on property line provided the design of the structure complies with the City's fire and building code. 2. Group II. Unenclosed structures such as gazebos, and patio covers (both trellis - type and solid) as well as detached enclosed structures not included in Group I, but containing less than 600 square feet of floor area such as sheds, children's playhouses and workshops, provided they do not exceed a maximum height of 10 feet above the pad or yard elevation of the main structure or home and are located no closer than five feet to a side property line, or 10 feet to a rear property line. Attached, enclosed structures in this category shall be located no closer to a property line than the setback prescribed for the main dwelling unit. 3. Group III. Garages, enclosed patios, workshops, cabanas, and similar enclosed structures containing 600 or more square feet of floor area provided they are located no closer to a property line than the setback prescribed for the main dwelling unit, except that straight -in entry garages may be required a greater setback. 4. Group IV. a. Swimming pools, jacuzzis, spas, and associated equipment; provided they may be permitted only within rear yard areas or the enclosed portion of a side yard. Pool equipment located within 10 feet of a property line shall be separated from the adjacent property by a minimum six -foot -high masonry wall or other City -approved noise reduction feature. Otherwise there shall be no required setback provided the design and installation complies with the City's building codes and the Design Guidelines and Development Regulations of this Specific Plan. b. Open trellis -type patio covers may not be located in a front yard area. Lot area. The minimum lot area for any new lot created in the R-1 district shall be as follows: A. Village 1 6,000 square feet Village 2 5,500 square feet Village 3 : 5,000 square feet Village 4,5,&6 : 4,500 square feet -3 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN VI. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS E. Public utility distribution and transmission facilities excluding private radio, television, and antennas and towers. F. Government buildings and service facilities. G. Public parks and/or playgrounds. H. Community centers and recreation buildings. I. Places of religious assembly or institution located on a site at least one-half acre in size. Uses subject to a conditional use permit. It is recognized that certain uses, while similar in characteristics to permitted uses herein, may have the potential to impact surrounding properties and therefore require additional approval and consideration. Uses permitted subject to approval of a use permit, pursuant to Chapter 17.168 LEMC,in the R-1 district shall be as follows: A. Keeping of exotic animals or birds, or more than two dogs or two cats, on the same lot as a permitted dwelling for pets only and not for commercial purposes. The Planning Commission shall impose adequate limitations to assure that the residential character of the property and neighborhood is maintained. B. Other uses that the Planning Commission finds by resolution to be in accord with the purpose of this chapter and having characteristics similar to those listed in this section. C. Commercial child day care centers. (Village 3 Recreation Area only.) Accessory uses and structures. The following accessory buildings and uses may be located on the same lot with a permitted dwelling; provided, that they are found to be compatible with the residential character of the village and that any buildings or structures be harmonious with the architectural style of the main building and overall project theme. With the exception of open trellis -type patio covers and detached garages, all accessory buildings and/or structures shall be located only in the rear of the lot. A. Uses. 1. Home occupations; subject to the completion and approval of an application for a home occupation issued by the Planning Department and compliance with the provisions of Chapter 17.48 LEMC. 2. Noncommercial hobbies. TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN VI. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS VI. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS The Terracina Specific Plan proposes general standards and regulations for development of the project over its buildout and beyond. This section of Development Regulations serves as the zoning document for the Terracina project. Zoning regulations and uses for development of the project which are not explicit in this document will be subject to the City's codes, ordinances and regulations. The City of Lake Elsinore Community Development Director or designee shall have the authority to interpret issues not specifically covered in the Specific Plan. Such interpretation shall be considered clarification and shall not cause the submittal of a Specific Plan Amendment. A. Zoning Zoning classifications referenced herein are customized designations for the Terracina Specific Plan but fashioned after the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Title 17. There is only one residential zone allowed in the Terracina project: "R- 1". B. Uses, Standards and Regulations The uses, standards and regulations of the Terracina Specific Plan will, for the most part, follow those established in the City's zoning code. Where discrepancies between the two are made herein, this document shall prevail. Where interpretation is needed it shall be interpreted by the City's Community Development Director. The R-1 District Purpose. The R-1 district is intended to accommodate low density projects comprised of quality single-family residences developed in an urban environment with public services and infrastructure. Permitted uses. Uses permitted in this district shall include those uses listed below when developed in compliance with the purpose and intent of this Specific Plan. Each use shall be evaluated in terms of its design characteristics and specific site location in keeping with the goals, policies and various design considerations of the Specific Plan. A. Single-family detached dwelling units: one dwelling unit per lot. B. Accessory uses and structures pursuant to LEMC 17.76.040. C. Small family day care and residential care facilities pursuant to Chapter17.52 LEMC. D. Large family day care homes in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 17.52 LEMC. TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN V. DESIGN GUIDELINES But other areas of the site should have specific lighting sources to accent landscaping in these areas: • various project entries; • individual villages; • the main recreation area and park; • walkways in the park and recreation areas. Lighting design and standards should be well chosen to complement the builder's theme. Different types of lighting standards can be upright, wall mounted (as in the recreation areas) or bollard in nature. 6. Basins: State and local laws, ordinances and regulations sometimes require the use of basins as a means to address and mitigate water quality issues as well as increased run-off naturally caused by development of the site. Basins are located in Villages 1, 5 and 6 and vary in size and shape based on the amount of run-off, or flows, exiting the site at that particular location. Manufactured slopes are a normal design component of basins of this nature and can be 2:1 or 4:1, horizontal to vertical, slope ratio. All side slopes as part of a basin design must be landscaped in such a manner as to prevent erosion and failure of the slope or the basin itself. Groundcover, bushes and trees shall be California native drought -tolerant plants. The Table below is a breakdown of the various components of the Terracina Land use Plan as discussed above with acreages and percentage of development in each category. (Exhibit V-12: "Land Use Breakdown") Table V-1: Land Use Breakdown Land Use Acreage Percenta e of Project Residential 99.0 65.6 Park/Rec. Center 1.6 1.1 _ Graded Slopes 28,2 18.7 _ Natural Open Space Basins 22.0 14.6 TOTAL 150.8 100.0% V - 17 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN V. DESIGN GUIDELINES Secondary entries throughout the project could have less impactful statements but would also implement pavement and landscaping to provide the sense that one has entered at Terracina. 3. Parks, Recreation Area and Open Space: It is important that the 2.1 -acre recreation area and park located in the center of the project in Village 3 be designed and amenitized in such a manner that most of the residents of Terracina use it often. The amenity package shall be constructed/installed by the project builder subject to City approval of the park design. The central location within the project implies that it is not too far to walk or bicycle to the park with family and friends leaving the car at home. Landscaping as well will play a significant role in attracting residents to use this park/recreation area. (Exhibit IV -2: "Park Exhibit.) 4. Slopes and Natural Open Space: The natural topographic relief of the site is significant both in the western and eastern portions of the site. The westerly knoll and the relief in the easterly area of 173 feet provide for designed slopes throughout the project. Because of these natural topographic features, Terracina has been designed in vertically separated residential planning areas or villages. These separated areas produce slopes between them which will be landscaped to provide visually appealing scenery, will take advantage of view -shed opportunities as well as being sensitive to water usage and to prevent slope erosion. (Exhibit V- 12: "Land Use Breakdown".) The plant species for these slopes will be California native drought -tolerant plants selected by the builder's landscape architect and approved by the City and installed per the City's requirements. The natural open space within Terracina is located primarily in Villages 1 and 6 and consist of the ungraded portions of the hillsides within those areas. (Exhibit V-12: "Land Use Breakdown".) Because of the desire to keep as much natural open space as practical, landscaping in these areas will be kept to a minimum except for those areas which may be needed to provide for fuel modification purposes to protect homes from wildland fires. Plant species for these landscaped fuel modification areas are dictated by the fire prevention report prepared for Terracina. 5. Lighting: Lighting is considered a landscaping feature in that it assists in calling attention to attractively landscaped areas of the project in the evenings. Lighting will occur within public street rights -of -ways for safety purposes, as required by the City, and will in some areas of the site cover landscaped areas as well. V- 15 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN S',,., 1111 1141,1 .b I ACKBUROCE PILASTPRS AT 6 AND B PEET MG11. WOOD OR SI&MLATEDWOOD ACCENTS SHEET OF 2 EXHIBIT V -11 MAIN ENTRY STATEMENT DAVID 'It I 1.1's , iWllWl4 130 lil"ET" 511s SHEET 1OF2 IF �RR9 00N Rpgp EiVTRy (SFfisH ?Ofi N.T.S. EXHIBIT V -11 MAIN ENTRY STATEMENT 'Julj� SRtC � U G .1C Ui KL VII F. 609 y 11 >PI Ct G! C 0 ( n41 ftC )96 f AK i9?.91 80- v?] V. DESIGN GUIDELINES The street pattern within each village and throughout the development should be curvilinear to avoid straight, less interesting streets. Curvilinear streets provide more interest in the neighborhood. In order to minimize through -streets, cul-de-sacs should be used wherever possible. Because cul-de-sacs have a definitive end point and are shorter in length than thru-streets, traffic volumes are less and high speeds are more difficult to obtain, therefore making the street safer for children to play there. Knuckles, strategically located, will also cause slower traffic throughout the neighborhoods. Cul-de-sac bulbs and knuckles also provide "pie -shaped" lots for buyers who desire a larger rear yard. Due to the existing development around the southern and eastern portions of the project and the limited access potential from the north, the main entrance to this site should be from Terra Cotta Road. The entrance should evoke a "sense of arrival" by the use of landscaping and signage/monumentation. Other entrances to the site should offer secondary and less significant statements of pavement and landscaping. There are many view opportunities surrounding the Terracina site, of Lake Elsinore, the Elsinore Mountains to the south and the hills to the west. Residential lots should be placed wherever possible to take advantage of these view -shed areas. B. Landscape Guidelines 1. Purpose and Intent: The purpose and intent of the landscape guidelines is to provide a landscape plan for the Terracina project which complements the project's architectural theme and characteristics while meeting water usage requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore and State of California and providing for an attractive and pleasing community in Terracina. The landscape design should enhance the neighborhood style and character and also the "sense of place" and at the various project entries, a "sense of arrival". 2. Entry Statements: Each entry into the Terracina project should have a degree of landscaping commensurate with the importance of the entry. The main project entry of Terra Cotta Road should be the prominent statement with decorated pavement, signage/monumentation and landscaping. The statement at the main entry should be one of "arrival" as well as one which compliments the project theme. For instance, for the Tuscan theme the builder might use, Mediterranean -themed landscaping. This could be provided to signify the "arrival" and the sense of a theme when first entering the project. (Exhibit V -ll: "Main Entry Statement".) V- 13 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN \ EXHIBIT G, CRAFTSMAN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 22U\ R@ 2 - 9 » \ cd ® 2 © \ t \ � / \ U / /P, •j 3\ EXHIBIT G, CRAFTSMAN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE EXHIBIT «r SPANISH BUNGow ARCHITECTURAL STYLE o,.,.. . EXHIBIT «r SPANISH BUNGow ARCHITECTURAL STYLE (OL Z EXHIBIT V - 7 SPANISH BUNGALOW ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 10 0, A 0 40 bow N IL 0 b4tV5 fz, vj (OL Z EXHIBIT V - 7 SPANISH BUNGALOW ARCHITECTURAL STYLE I fu 1—J ko EXHIBIT V - 6 CALIFORNIA RANCH ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 00 r4 + fu 1—J ko EXHIBIT V - 6 CALIFORNIA RANCH ARCHITECTURAL STYLE i a o�d w oar Kis Z Ka' is Ki Fmk EXHIBIT V- 5 CALIFORNIA RANCH ARCHITECTURAL STYLE z c7 a Lu h EXHIBIT V - 4 TUSCAN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE w a A 0.j aj�4� • 6 • O EXHIBIT V - 4 TUSCAN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE EXHIBIT V - 3 TUSCAN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE o EXHIBIT V - 3 TUSCAN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE ;, e 0 U v a N N U 0 R A w co W a tYtl � N tOj q y a � ro ro m � a j pp EXHIBIT V - 2 SANTA BARBARA ARCHITECTURAL STYLE CV N N N a @ 4 @ 8 @ @ @ EXHIBIT V - 2 SANTA BARBARA ARCHITECTURAL STYLE a R MM EXHIBIT g, 1 SANTA BARBARA ARCHITECTURAL STYLE V. DESIGN GUIDELINES color, materials, articulation and character, all within a chosen architectural style whether it be Santa Barbara, Tuscan, California Ranch, Spanish Bungalow, Craftsman or any other style chosen by the builder and approved by the City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission. (Exhibits V-1 through V-10:"Architectural Styles".) Consistent theming can be accomplished with architectural details such as window styles, roof shapes, and materials used. Windows can be inset into the building walls or popped out with appropriate trim. They can be articulated with sills, trim and shutters complementary to the theme chosen for Terracina. Because the front elevations are mostly seen from the public streets it is anticipated that the majority of the articulation and styling will occur on these facades although side and rear elevations should be articulated as well. Architecture for homes on corner lots and lots with public view should be treated as important areas of the building and within the community to warrant a more aggressive use of styling and articulation. Enhanced elevations shall be required on all residential elevations (i.e. front, rear and side) visible from streets and other public views. As an example, if the builders of Terracina choose a Tuscan style of architecture, the architecture might consist of such elements of stone, warm colors of yellows, beiges, browns, arched window frames, window sills that might accommodate a large flower pot, or a similar arch used over windows. The theme of the community should not only come from a consistent, harmonious architectural statement as the main element of a theme, but also be complemented by such things as landscaping. 4. Residential Site Planning Criteria: The overall site planning concept should be to create stand-alone villages consisting of different architectural product types with a variety of floor plans and, therefore, a range of price points to attract a larger portion of the home -buying public to Terracina. The project design should respect the natural contour of the land, yet use the site's contour to create value (e.g. views) wherever practical. Each village within Terracina should strive to have its own identity and to be separate from the other: no two lots from two different villages with different architecture should be located side-by-side. Most villages should be separated physically, and where practical, vertically, by a planted slope. The separation of villages, though, should be tied together by the selected architectural theme for Terracina. TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN V. DESIGN GUIDELINES V. DESIGN GUIDELINES The architectural and landscaping guidelines of this section are non- specific, and in some cases, intentionally vague to allow maximum flexibility for the ultimate builder of Terracina. However, the ultimate builder must, still, at the construction plan stage of development comply with all necessary design regulations for architecture and landscaping. A. Architectural Guidelines 1. Purpose and Intent: It is the purpose and intent of these architectural guidelines to give examples of how certain elements of the plan will be addressed architecturally. Below, the discussion includes design criteria, theming and site planning criteria; all in an effort to create a community with attractive and harmonious character with lasting quality. 2. Residential Design Criteria: Design criteria from which Terracina will ultimately be made should promote lasting quality. Building massing should be single and two story residential buildings and avoid boxy massing wherever possible. A mix of single and two story residential homes should be provided. Some two-story homes should have single story elements incorporated. Quality can be defined by the materials used, the color - coordination between buildings and villages, the manner in which garages are handled, the use of balconies and entry courtyards, articulation in the facades and, simply stated but attractive front doors. Other criteria to be considered should be a variety in roofing, both in color and in the use of materials and certain types of articulation; the use of covered porches, exposed chimneys, recessed areas by windows and window shutters to provide distinction and visual interest. Consistent garage setbacks along a straight street provides for a monotonous street scene and should be avoided by using a varying setback as well as the possibility of side -on -garages. The site plan, wherever possible, should provide a curvilinear street pattern to avoid the monotonous street scene. Flat roofs should be avoided where possible. The roof ridge elevation and orientation should provide visual variety and, from home to home, avoid sameness. They should harmonize and complement one another in form and color but roofs should not be the main focal point of the architecture. 3. Residential Theming: Residential theming, or style, should be diverse yet complimentary from Village to Village in massing, - 1 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN 0 fit _ ullllll 116ii I .kll�Itillii ill �i a 10 � • I ir HI i1 1 X w 1/ � v •��� ,� It 14� .j C�t lit' !", 1�j illcaV,ta WO n] IV. DEVELOPMENT PLAN Phasing Plan Due to the size of the project, both in acreage and lot count, Terracina will be built out in several construction phases. Each phase will follow the Village layout of the plan (Exhibit IV -14.) It is anticipated that the entire project will be rough graded as one grading operation. Actual construction phases will occur at such time as dictated by the market demands for housing in this area of Lake Elsinore. The developer/builder reserves the right to adjust the phasing sequence to meet these market demands. However ultimately configured, the builder must supply utilities to each phase as well as a minimum of two points of ingress/egress. IV - 29 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN IV. DEVELOPMENT PLAN A fire prevention, suppression and fuel modification plan has been prepared by Firesafe Planning Solutions who specialize in these reports. The Fuel Modification Plan for the Terracina project will be completed using a performance based criteria based on fire and wind modeling and the effects of topography, wildland fuels, fire and weather history and placement of the structure relative to the hazards. The conceptual fuel modification plan utilizes a combination of irrigated wet zone, thinning zones, physical barriers such as radiant heat walls and hardscape such as roadways to achieve defensible space that is appropriate for each interface as the micro modeling determined the risk to be in that specific area. The precise fuel modification plan will include a specific plant palette and other conditions for maintenance and future improvements within and adjacent to the fuel modification zones to insure that they remain in a condition that provides the protection that has been designed into them for this project. H. Water Quality Management Plan A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) is required by the State of California to appropriately address storm water drainage flows from the site which may have been polluted by the development. The implementation of a preliminary and final WQMP as approved by the City of Lake Elsinore, is the responsibility of the project developer and project HOA. The WQMP will utilize Low Impact Development (LID) Best Management Practices (BMP's) to mitigate for "pollutants of concern" leaving the project. The LID BMP's will consist of one infiltration basin located in the southwest portion of the project in Village 1 and 2 extended detention basins: one located in the northeast portion of the site in Village 5 and one located in the northwest portion of the site in Village 6. In addition, the majority of the offsite natural areas will be directed around the site. All three basins will also be utilized to mitigate increased runoff of drainage that will occur due to the hardscape development of the project. TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN IV. DEVELOPMENT PLAN E-3.2 Energy Efficient Street and Traffic Signal Lights • Does the project involve the installation of street or traffic signal lights? If so, are they Low Emitting Diode (LED) lights? Discussion: Yes. The developers of Terracina will comply with all City -adopted codes and/or ordinances requiring LED lights in street lights and traffic signals required for the project. E-4.1 Landscaping • Does the development comply with the City's AB 1881 Landscaping Ordinance? Discussion: Yes. The developers and future builders of Terracina will comply with the City's new/updated Landscape Ordinance. E-4.2 Indoor Water Conservation Requirements • Does the development reduce indoor water consumption by 30%, consistent with CalGreen Tier 1, Section A5.303.2.3.1? Discussion: (Section A5.303.2.3.1 is a voluntary measure for non-residential developments. Terracina is a residential project.) However, many builders are aware of the many plumbing fixtures, fittings, etc. that can be installed in homes to reduce water consumption by 20%. S-1.4 Construction and Demolition Waste Diversion • Is the project accompanied by a waste management plan that demonstrates how 65% of the nonhazardous construction and demolition debris generated at the site will be recycled or salvaged? Discussion: The Cal Green Code requires builders to divert 50% of construction waste from landfills to recycling. The builders of Terracina will comply with this measure. G. Fuel Modification Plan The City's General Plan shows the Terracina project site located within a very high fire hazard zone susceptible to wildland fires generally from the north and east. Areas surrounding the project to the west and south are, generally, not subject to wildland fires as these areas consist of existing residential development. (Exhibit IV-13:"Fuel Modification Plan") IV - 26 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN IV. DEVELOPMENT PLAN for 5% of tenant -occupied motorized vehicle parking capacity, with a minimum of one space? Discussion: The Terracina development is residential in nature and does not have "tenants". T-2.1 Designated Parking for Fuel -Efficient Vehicles • Does a non-residential development designate 10% of its total parking spaces for "Clean Air Vehicles?" Discussion: Terracina is a residential project. E-1.1 Tree Planting • Does the developer provide a 15 -gal non -deciduous, umbrella -form tree per 30 linear feet of boundary length, near buildings, or to shade pavement in parking lots and streets? Discussion: The developer of the Terracina project will follow the City's project level Conditions of Approval and City Codes requiring the installation of trees within the local street right-of-way and on the perimeter roads of the development to a ratio of at least one tree per home. Additional trees will be provided along project perimeter streets and within the recreation area and park. Trees may also be required by the City on graded slopes and within the detention/water quality basins as referenced in the City's Landscape Design Guidelines. E-1.2 Cool Roof Requirements Does the new non-residential development use roofing materials having solar reflectance, thermal emittance or Solar Reflectance Index 3 per CalGreen Tier 1 values? Discussion: Terracina is a residential project. E-1.3 Energy Efficient Building Standards • Does new construction achieve CalGreen Tier 1 energy efficiency standards? Discussion: Yes. The builder of Terracina will comply with all City -adopted measures or ordinances requiring that new construction exceed the California Energy Code requirements based on the 2008 Energy Efficiency Standards by 15% which is consistent with Cal Green Tier 1 Standards. 25 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN _ IV. DEVELOPMENT PLAN access to such destinations as: Stater Brothers, Albertsons, the Outlet Mall, Lakeside High School and La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch on the northerly side of the Lake and Walmart and Chase Bank on the east side of 1-15 at Railroad Canyon Road. Route 22 connects with Route 7 at Collier Avenue and Central Avenue and connects riders to Perris, Woodcrest, Mead Valley and downtown Riverside. T-1.4 Bicycle Infrastructure Where applicable, does the project implement the network of Class I, ll, and II [sic] III bikeways, trails and safety features identified in the General Plan, Bike Lane Master Plan, Trails Master Plan and Western Riverside County Non -Motorized Transportation Plan? Discussion: Yes. The Terracina project will be constructing Class II bikeways in Lakeshore Drive and Terra Cotta Road per the City's General Plan/Bike Lane Master Plan. The City's Trails Master Plan shows the nearest trail approximately one mile from the site. • Does the project, where applicable, provide connections to the network identified in those plans? Discussion: Yes, The City's Bike Lane Master Plan shows Class 11 bike lanes adjacent to the project site on Lakeshore Drive. And although Terra Cotta Road does not show as a Bike Lane on the City's Bikeway Plan the standard cross-section for this road, a Secondary Highway, does show bike lanes within the right-of-way which will be constructed per this plan. Bike lanes within the right-of-way of these roads within or adjacent to the project boundaries will be constructed by the Terracina project. T-1.5 Bicycle Parking • Does new, non-residential development that is anticipated to generate visitor traffic provide permanently anchored bicycle racks within 200 feet of the visitor entrance, readily visible to passers-by, for 5% of visitor motorized vehicle parking capacity, with a minimum of one two -bike capacity rack? Discussion: The Terracina development is a residential project and has no "visitor traffic". However, the Terracina project will install permanently anchored bike racks at the recreation area and park within the development. • Does the development propose a building with over 10 tenant spaces? If so, does it provide secure bicycle parking IV - 24 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN IV. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2. Is the project consistent with the General Plan population and employment projections for the site, upon which the CAP modeling is based? Discussion: Yes. The population projected for the Terracina project is 1577 persons using 3.37 persons/household and a total of 468 homes. The maximum persons allowed under the General Plan is 2776 persons. 3. Does the project incorporate the following CAP measures as binding and enforceable components of the project? Until these measures have been formally adopted by the City and incorporated in to applicable codes, the requirements must be incorporated as mitigation measures applicable to the project (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15183.5(b)(2)). T-1.2 Pedestrian Infrastructure • Does the project provide sidewalks along new and reconstructed streets? Discussion: Yes. As required by the Public Works/Engineering Department of the City, Terracina will provide sidewalks along both sides of all streets proposed within the development as well as streets bordering the project and needing expansion to full -width improvements. Terracina will construct 8.5 miles of sidewalks within the development and on its perimeter. • Does the project provide sidewalks or paths to internally link all uses in a project where applicable? Discussion: Yes. The main features of the project (the 2.1 -acre park in Village 3 and open space areas in Villages 1 and 6) are all accessed by public streets with paved sidewalks. Does the project provide connections to neighborhood activity centers, major destinations, and transit contiguous to site? Discussion: There are no neighborhood activity centers, major destinations and/or transit facilities connected with or adjacent to the site that would allow easy pedestrian access. The Riverside Transit Agency has three routes (#7, 8 and 22) in the vicinity of the project. Routes 7 and 8 provide a circuitous route around the Lake; Route 7 on the easterly side and Route 8 on the westerly side. Route 8 has a bus -stop nearest the project at the intersection of Lakeshore Drive and Machado Street approximately one block to the south. These two routes provide IV - 23 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN IV. DEVELOPMENT PLAN The main project HOA is also responsible for the maintenance of natural, ungraded open space/hillsides (as in Villages 1 and 6) including the fuel modification areas. The City of Lake Elsinore will be responsible for the long-term maintenance of all public streets (paving, curb and gutter, sidewalks and parkway landscaping) within and off-site of the project, such as the off- site extension of Terra Cotta Road to existing Nichols Road to the east and the off-site extension of Hoff Avenue to Terra Cotta Road's extension to the north. The project HOA will be responsible for the maintenance of the biologically sensitive natural area located on the southeasterly side of Terra Cotta Road in Village 3. The project HOA will also be responsible for the maintenance of the three water quality/retention basins located in Villages 1, 5 and 6. These maintenance efforts mainly include keeping the areas free of debris which could clog inlets and pipes and to keep landscaping in a healthy condition to prevent erosion of the basin as well as the upkeep of all storm drain facilities which function for and within the basin. The lift station site located near the water quality/detention basin in Village 5 will be maintained by EVMWD. The funding for maintenance of Terracina comes from the homeowner for maintenance of his lot; the HOA monthly dues (but maintained by a company selected by the HOA Board of Directors); or by a City -created Landscape and Lighting District which will impose a tax created for the Terracina development but maintained by various City departments or city -selected entities. F. Climate Action Plan (CAP) A Climate Action Plan, approved by the City December 13, 2011, was created as a recommendation of the recently updated City General Plan. As such, all projects are recommended to comply with its "Project - Land CAP Consistency Worksheet". Following is a discussion regarding Terracina's compliance with the City's CAP: . Project -Level Climate Action Plan Consistency: 1. Is the project consistent with the General Plan land use designation? Discussion: Yes. The Terracina project does not propose a land use change from the existing General Plan designations of Low Density Residential and Low -Medium Density Residential for the 151 -acre site. Using these designations, the City's General Plan allows a maximum of 824 dwelling units. Terracina proposes a maximum of 468 homes. IV - 22 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN IV. DEVELOPMENT PLAN easterly portion consists of gentle rolling hills with a relief of approximately 173 feet; the hill on the southerly boundary has an elevation of 1448 at its highest point and the flow line of the swale that exits the site at the easterly boundary has an elevation of 1275 at its lowest point. (Exhibit IV -10: "Existing Topography".) The grading concept of Terracina is simplistic in nature. The knoll on the west will be lowered just enough to provide access to the top for view lots of the lake and surrounding hills and mountains. The excess dirt from the knoll grading will be used in the easterly portions of the site to create residential lots with the fill dirt. Because there is a significant amount of natural topographic relief in the easterly portions of the site, terraced "super -pads" have been designed for the various Villages providing an elevation differential and separate identity from one Village to the next. Slopes created by the terraced grading concept allow for view lots along the edge, or top, of the slope. (Exhibit IV -11: "Terraced Grading Concept With View Sheds".) The grading design concept also allows for "balance areas" within the layout (those areas which can be raised or lowered slightly during the final engineering design process) to allow for on-site balance of cut and fill quantities thereby eliminating the need for import or export dirt to or from the site. E. Maintenance Plan The Maintenance Plan provides for the identity of necessary entities to maintain the various components of the project. There will be three responsible parties involved in the upkeep and care of the Terracina project: the homeowners, a project homeowner's association (HOA), and the City of Lake Elsinore. (Exhibit IV -12: "Maintenance Plan".) The homeowners will be responsible for maintaining their individual residential lots. For those residential lots with graded slopes (up slopes) in their rear or side yards, these slopes will be the owners' individual maintenance responsibility. Homeowners will also be responsible for maintaining any parkway between the home and the curb. Down slopes within the homeowners' lot will be maintained by the project HOA. The project HOA will be responsible for the maintenance of the recreation area and park, all graded slopes abutting public street right-of- way which are not part of a residential lot, and all private streets. The exception is the up slopes from the public street right-of-way within private lots: these will also be maintained by the HOA. IV - 18 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN IV. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 3. Animal Services: Animal Friends of the Valley is a private company under contract with the City for animal services and is located at 33751 Mission Trail in Wildomar. 4. Utilities (Water, Wastewater and Reclaimed Water): The Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) serves Terracina with domestic water, wastewater or sewerage and reclaimed or recycled water. Existing water lines in Lakeshore Drive, Terra Cotta Road, Dryden Street, Stoddard Street and Swan Avenue will be used for connection purposes to the proposed water line system in the Terracina project. A looped system is required which assists in meeting domestic water pressure as well as fire -flow pressure requirements. Wastewater or sewer lines are currently provided in Lakeshore Drive and will serve the Terracina project. The easterly portion of Terracina drains in an easterly direction to a proposed lift station in Village 5. The flows will then be pumped in a force main in a westerly direction towards the existing 10" sewer line in Lakeshore Drive. A sewer area study was prepared for Terracina by KWC Engineers which has been reviewed and approved by EVMWD. Reclaimed water will not be required by EVMWD for the Terracina project as there are no existing lines in the vicinity of the project. 5. Electric and Natural Gas: Southern California Edison and Southern California Gas Company provide their respective utilities to the Terracina project. Existing lines for gas and electric exist in the existing surrounding streets of Terra Cotta Road, Lakeshore Drive, Dryden Street, Stoddard Street and Arnold Avenue. The necessary lines in the Terracina development will be connected to these existing lines for service. 6. Trash and Recycling: Residents of Terracina will be provided three (3) sixty (60) gallon containers for garbage, green waste and recycling by CR&R, the private company providing this service for the City. 7. Telephone and Cable TV: Verizon will provide the land line telephone service for the Terracina resident and the cable TV, cell phone and high speed internet services are provided by Comcast of Los Angeles. D. Grading Plan The existing topography of the site consists of a prominent knoll on the western portion of the site adjacent to Lakeshore Drive while the -17 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN RM RM 30, —-- 30, .fi 4 S/DE 4 WALK WALK _ 2% 296 _ -- AGAR CROSS SECTION ENTRY STREET VILLAGE 6 N.T.S. EXHIBIT IV - 9 ENTRY STREET - VILLAGE 6 DAVID JEFFENS CONSULTIN INC +s SGLCTRUM roNre Da W. suir� eo, �I y IAKe copksi CA 926jo 19x91 5W5))0. IA, . 194" 506-552] MI1f WlY I1VYltl19NW11YfAWLVMPo4WIIFY0��1L.10.'1OUARLWAtl IV. DEVELOPMENT PLAN The circulation patterns of the Terracina plan will ultimately connect each Village, with the exception of Village 6 which is isolated on the north because Terra Cotta Road bifurcates the project site. As discussed above, there are six (6) (Exhibit II -4: "Existing Street Access') streets providing site ingress/egress to the project and each Village has two separate access points. The exception, due to the City's intersection spacing requirements, is Village 6 where access is provided off Terra Cotta Road by a publicly dedicated road 60 feet wide (Exhibit IV -9: "Entry Street -Village 6") and public right-of-way cul-de-sacs on either side. C. Public Facilities, Services and Utilities The Terracina development will be dependent upon the following public facilities, services and utilities as provided by the City or other utility companies: • Fire and Police • Schools and Libraries • Animal Services • Utilities • Electric and Natural Gas • Trash and Recycling • Telephone and Cable TV 1. Fire and Police: Although there are no fire or police stations/sheriff sub -station proposed to be located within the Terracina project boundaries there are existing fire and police stations located nearby the project. The nearest fire station is located at Vicker Canyon Park approximately 1.5 miles southwesterly of the project site. The nearest police station is located approximately 1.5 miles from Terracina on the westerly edge of the lake at Riverside Drive and Lincoln Street. 2. Schools and Libraries: Terracina is served by the Lake Elsinore Unified School District for elementary, middle and high schools. The elementary schools serving Terracina are located in the Alberhill project just north and adjacent to Terracina and another one located south of Terracina on Jay Street approximately one - mile from the project. Terra Cotta Middle School is located on Lake Street at Lakeshore Drive approximately one-half mile from Terracina. The high school serving the project is Lakeside High School on Riverside Drive approximately two miles away to the south near the westerly side of the lake. The nearest library to the Terracina site is Vick Knight Community Library located at Lakeside High School near the western side of the lake. IV - 15 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN WLYEl. Y P/w 6 1 8' RAN 10, -14� to' !Z12 L OL -.� R-- --- —41SED MOM SLOPE 2% SLOPE LMDSCAMD ACIAS SIDEWALK' MEDIAN MAIN ENTRY STREET (TERRACINA DRIVE) N.T.S. EXHIBIT IV - 8 MAIN ENTRY STREET CROSS - SECTION DAVID, JUTF.RSC ON',ULTNG INC W SIF. I HuPONIE DR11P SWT1 5o9 LAKC'l , ORINT, CA 92630 560- 776, FAN. (949) 586-SW7 I R/W RAh' � F' 3'P.U.E.-3 t-I 5 01 20 5 3'P.U.E. - _ I SIDE• SIDE-'- WALK WALK`,nT. -_ z% 2% FT:- AGM- CASTYPICAL TYPICALSECTION LOCAL STREETS N.T.S. EXHIBIT IV - 7 LOCAL STREETS CROSS SECTIONS $` DAVID III I;LI? ('QNSULI ING IN(,. .H 19 SPCCTRUM POINTE ORM, SUIE 699 IANC FORIST CA 92Gd0 U 91 ,,,7R PAX Ion 91 7B6 5521 EWST. EXIST. RNV RNV R IMPROVEMENTS BYOTNERS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TRACT36557 SO_EXIST. RM' _ 30' 30' f0' 20r 20' 10' .y q, 0, - 12' 0 q SIDE- ONE SIDE- _.. rWALK WALK. �2% 2%� ACIAB CROSS SECTION DOLBEER STREET, PIERCE STREET & HOFF AVENUE N.T.S. EXHIBIT IV - 6 DOLBEER STREET, PIERCE STREET AND HOFF AVENUE CROSS SECTIONS DAVID JErFERS CONSULI_ING INC , 19 sFmTRmn Powle DRNe. sullu 609 i LAKE rCREST, CA 9ffi90 1991 60C 51/0 FAX 19491 586-552) nruainmam ieRVHwMIv31.vN 5valA'tlYvr xo lOc-[ Axo MtnlS f.BW %crMIMO PLY RAN r rurvs'Eo MPROVEMENTS EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS f0' 20' 20' _ 10' ?v 4' _ 6' _ 104 6' q' SIDE- WALK —FsWALK AC✓AB CROSS SECTION DRYDEN STREET & STODDARD STREET N.T.S. EXHIBIT IV - 5 DRYDEN STREET AND STODDARD STREET CROSS SECTIONS + DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING INC O� �J +9 SPECTFNOPOINT(DRIVE, SUITE 609 LAKE EOFESI C5 92630 19n9) 586-579, "'X 1919) 186,111, ZN $ i a W55 % Z0zW ~$tea quiq SotF 66 UON LL W 0 { � \ S y / ry r �i ARAgID AVENUE \ $ STEVENSSTRM7 ---__� �/ ♦ ,lay BVI7STREET /\ ♦ S \ RO rj IV. DEVELOPMENT PLAN Hoff Avenue will be extended westerly to Terra Cotta Road with a paved roadway section as approved by the City Engineer. (Exhibit IV -4: "Terra Cotta Road and Hoff Avenue Off-site Extensions".) Lakeshore Drive is an existing Urban Arterial with existing half - width improvements along the frontage of the project. The Terracina project will complete the improvements on the north side of Lakeshore Drive consisting of pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk and parkway landscaping. Dryden Street is located along the southerly boundary of the site and is constructed on its southerly side to half -width improvements. Terracina will complete the improvements for Dryden Street thereby providing full -width access to the project. Although the length of frontage for Stoddard Street on the south is only approximately 350 feet, Terracina will also complete its half -width improvements to provide full -width access to the project. (Exhibit IV -5: "Dryden Street and Stoddard Street Cross Sections'.) The extended improvements include paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk and landscaping in the parkway. Bordering the westerly portion of the project is Dolbeer Street, Hoff Avenue and Pierce Street rights-of-way with no existing improvements. These three streets will be improved, under the Terracina project, to the City standard of half -width improvements consisting of pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk and parkway landscaping. (Exhibit IV -6: "Dolbeer Street, Hoff Avenue, and Pierce Street Cross Sections".) The interior local streets, as proposed for the Terracina project, will be dedicated to the City of Lake Elsinore as public streets for maintenance by the City. These local streets will have a 50 -foot wide right-of-way. The improvements will consist of paving, curb and gutter, sidewalks and landscaping on both sides. The curb to curb roadway width will be 40' wide allowing parking on both sides. (Exhibit IV -7: "Local Streets Cross Section".) A 3' Public Utility Easement (P.U.E.) will be included on both sides behind the sidewalk. The main access into the bulk of the project (Villages 1 through 4) will be from Terra Cotta Road. This main access road is the project's "marketing window" and will have a right-of-way width of 70 feet and will include a 10 -foot wide median for landscaping purposes from Terra Cotta Road into the project. (Exhibit IV -8: "Main Entry Street Cross Section".) IV -9 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN RM 1 ol RW _ _ 10 a 35 -- 35 {___ S'- BIKE (P TED) ME BIKE Y Al TED) LANE E h i Y�� o LOP �R �j1k% SLOPE 2% 2% r-- �. SS.. 4< i 0 AGAR SECONDARY HIGHWAY TERRA C_0_1_7A ROAD N.T.B. SLY N'LY RAY EXIST7NG IMPROVEMENTS ,_ EXTENSION FOR TR 36557 RMI so,66 _ -_ 6 6 r 17 -!-,_6' B SIDE- BIKE BIKE WALK LANE LANE � h i SLOPE ( 2% 2% SLOPE P - - -. �Im URBAN ARTERIAL LAKESHORE DRIVE N.T.S. EXHIBIT IV - 3 TERRA COTTA ROAD AND LAKESHORE DRIVE CROSS SECTIONS 1111 DAVID JHFeaS COMSULTING INC LA F FOREST 19 SPECT13UM. IOIML DFVI BUIL Les CA 90LJU 19491 5865! 8 -AN. 19491 58C 5537 pnmoumu2lWtNM1gNMAYN ufnla rt»¢1WIINOIA4b RarW it'll.. 33 CANE y � �' IV. DEVELOPMENT PLAN condition except for any areas which might be needed for fuel modification adjacent to the proposed residential structures by using a 2:1 graded slope containing fire resistant plantings as well as irrigation as is referenced in the project's Fuel Modification Plan in item "G" of this section. A detention/water quality basin is located at the easterly side of the Village. This basin handles flows from the proposed residential area as well as flows coming into the area from the north. The following Table IV -1 "Maximum/Dwelling Unit Count Per Village" is a summary of the villages discussed above showing the maximum dwelling units for each village based on the acreage and maximum density of the village. Table IV -1 Maximum Dwelling Unit Count Per Village VILLAGE ACRES DENSITY DU/ACRE MINIMUM LOT SIZE LOTS (MAX.) 1 29.9 2.5 6,000 72 2 20.4 4.5 5,500 84 _ 3 20.9 4.5 5,000 91 4 18.0 5.0 4,500 89 _ 5 17.8 5.5 4,500 _ 94 6 7.8 5.0 4,500 38 TOTAL _ 468 B. Circulation Plan The approximately 151 -acre Terracina project site is surrounded by either partially improved streets and/or streets with existing dedicated rights-of-way which provide access to the site. Existing streets of Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street intersect with Lakeshore Drive on the westerly portion of the project. Lakeshore Drive is proposed as a 120 -foot right-of-way under the City's General Plan as an Urban Arterial with a divided roadway of six (6) lanes of traffic. Terra Cotta Road, a 90 -foot right-of-way and a Secondary Highway under the City's General Plan, is partially improved from Lakeshore Drive to the northerly boundary of the project site (Exhibit IV -3: "Terra Cotta Road and Lakeshore Drive Cross Sections'.) A meandering dirt road exists from that point northerly to existing Nichols Road. The developer of Terracina will construct full -width improvements to the project's northerly boundary and, in addition, improve Terra Cotta Road from the north project boundary to Nichols Road with a paved roadway section, as approved by the City Engineer. To further enhance traffic circulation in the project and surrounding areas -7 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN IV. DEVELOPMENT PLAN d. Village 4 Village 4 is located in the eastern portion of the project and consists of 18.0 acres. The maximum density allowed is 5.0 du/ac with a maximum yield of 89 lots. The minimum lot size will be 4,500 square feet. Access to Village 4 is from local streets within Village 3 to the west and Village 5 to the north from the existing right-of-way of Dolbeer Street. e. Village 5 Located on the far northerly portion of the project site, Village 5 is 17.8 acres in size and includes a water quality/detention basin in the Village. The density proposed is a maximum of 5.5 du/ac for a maximum yield of 94 lots for a single family detached residential lot type. The minimum lot size for Village 5 will be 4,500 square feet. Village 5 is bounded by Dolbeer Street on the west and Hoff Avenue and Pierce Street on the north. All three streets are unimproved but with right-of-way dedications in place. These streets will be improved to half -width City standards with Hoff Avenue extending westerly to meet the extension of Terra Cotta Road which eventually connects to existing Nichols Road to the north. A water quality/detention basin is located in this Village as it is, from a drainage standpoint, the most down -stream of Villages 2 through 5. The purpose of the basin is to serve as mitigation for water quality purposes as well as detention of increased run-off caused by the development. f. Village 6 Village 6 is located on the northern side of Terra Cotta Road and forms a triangular shaped area with the northern -most property boundary corner. Village 6 is 7.8 acres in size and is proposed to allow for a single family detached residential product. This single family product will have a maximum density of 5.5 du/ac and a maximum lot yield of 38 homes. Village 6 will have a minimum of 4.500 square feet for single family residential product. Due to the city's street intersection spacing requirements for Terra Cotta Road, a Secondary Highway, there can be only one access into Village 6 to the north of Terra Cotta Road. With the single family detached residential layout, a cul-de-sac should not exceed 600 linear feet on either side of the entrance street off of Terra Cotta Road. The northerly portion of Village 6 has an existing natural slope ratio that is, for the most part, undevelopable and will be left in a natural TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN IV. DEVELOPMENT PLAN c. Village 3 Village 3 is centrally located within the Terracina development plan with its main access taken from the project's main entry off Terra Cotta Road, another off of existing Dryden Street at Arnold Avenue and a third access from Village 4 to the north. Village 3 consists of 20.9 acres and has a maximum density of 4.5 du/ac with a maximum yield of 91 dwelling units. Village 3 will have a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet. A biologically sensitive area is located to the northwest and adjacent to Village 3 and consists of 3.8 gross acres and 2.3 net acres. This area is referred to in the environmental studies for the project as an area to be left in its natural state in an effort to conserve certain habitat features as well as preserve wetland areas as defined by various resource agencies. (Exhibit III -3: "Existing Biologically Sensitive Area.") Village 3 contains the project park consisting of 2.1 acres and centrally located in Village 3 for the use of the entire project residents. (Exhibit IV -2: "Park Exhibit.") The following should be considered, but not limited to, viable amenities for the park within Village 3: • Recreation building with restrooms • BBQ facilities • Picnic tables/eating areas • Pergolas for sun shade • Volleyball sand area • Paddle tennis • Turf areas • Child care facility with fenced play yard • Walking paths • Badminton court • Sandbox • "Jungle -Jim" play equipment • Drinking fountain • Play fountain/squirt park • Permanently anchored bicycle racks • Half basketball court. The project builder can select from the above list of amenities or propose their own list as they will be the entity to determine which ones are best for the Terracina development. The final park design shall be subject to approval by the City of Lake Elsinore's Director of Community Services or designee. -4 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN IV. DEVELOPMENT PLAN Each village is physically (i.e. horizontally and vertically) separated from other villages to create an individual identity with no overlap of different housing types or lot sizes. All planning areas have two separate points of ingress and egress as required by the City of Lake Elsinore and emergency response teams. The following includes a general paragraph of discussion followed by more detailed components of each village. a. Village 1 Village1 is located on the westerly portion of the site comprised of the prominent knoll surrounded by Terra Cotta Road, Lakeshore Drive and Dryden Street. The design of this Village should show grading sensitivity to the natural terrain/knoll by designing a circuitous street from Dryden Street around the sides and up to the relative top of the knoll. The design for this area incorporates a significant proportion of view lots within this Village. The majority of lots in Village 1 will have some sort of view either of the surrounding terrain, the Elsinore Mountains or Lake Elsinore. The residential portion of Village 1 totals 29.9 acres and has a maximum density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre and a maximum yield of 72 lots. The largest home product size within Terracina is intended for this Village 1 as it contains the largest lot sizes and contains a valuable view component as described above. The minimum lot size will be 6,000 square feet. Village 1 contains one of three water quality/detention basins and the only one with infiltration capabilities due to the soil characteristics for water quality mitigation purposes. (For additional water quality details refer to item "H" of this section.) The main project entry to the southeast of Terra Cotta Road will be one of the two points of access to Village 1. This main entry street will feature monumentation on the southerly side at Terra Cotta Road with a center median leading into the project. The other access into this area will be from existing Dryden Street. b. Village 2 Located in the southern portion of the plan and consisting of 20.4 acres, Village 2 has a maximum development density of 4.5 du/ac for a total yield of 84 lots planned for single family detached homes. The minimum lot size in Village 2 will be 5,500 square feet. Access into Village 2 comes from partially improved Stoddard Street and Swan Avenue on the south and proposed streets from Villages 3 and 4 to the north. The connector street between Village 3 and 4 also provides direct access to the Park in Village 3, TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN l Y, y> i`i'i lig ( � i -z i � l ypyp 5 7i BAILEYSTREET LASHSTREET -N ROAD 5oa � REpwNE �KE600 IV. DEVELOPMENT PLAN IV. DEVELOPMENT PLAN A. Land Use Plan 1. General Discussion/Opportunities The plan provided for in this Specific Plan offers a variety of lot sizes with a "village" design of various planning areas within the site. The Terracina project consists of approximately 151 acres with six (6) planning areas or villages for residential housing, a park site and potentially two additional recreation areas, a natural biological area, natural open space areas throughout the site and three (3) drainage basins strategically located to mitigate increased run-off and water quality issues. The site is currently surrounded by various street rights-of-way. Some are partially improved and some are proposed to be improved or partially improved by this project. Terra Cotta Road is partially improved up to the project boundary on the north. Lakeshore Drive, Dryden Street and Stoddard Street are partially improved with half -width improvements on the westerly and southerly boundaries of the site respectively. The northerly boundary of the site abuts existing dedicated right-of-way for Grey Avenue, Dolbeer Street, Hoff Avenue and Pierce Street. The on-site extension of full -width improvements for Terra Cotta Road will occur with the approval of this project as well as an off-site extension with partial improvements running northerly to existing Nichols Road. 2. Planning Areas/Villages The irregular-shaped 151 -acre site is divided into six (6) separate, individual planning areas or "villages' ranging in size from 7.8 acres to 29.9 acres. (Exhibit IV -1: 'Proposed Land Uses and Villages".) These planning areas will have a variety of lot sizes offering a variety of housing product in an effort to create distinction in the community. The six (6) Villages are broken down into only two (2) land use designations: "Low", and "Low Medium" density residential. The Low density designation applies only to Village 1 while Villages 2 through 6 are Low -Medium designations. IV - 1 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN III. EXISTING SETTING of Terracina and also residents of areas surrounding the project and throughout the City as it provides another arterial road for the vicinity and improves traffic circulation in the community and region. TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN III EXISTING SETTING The topographic constraint is two -fold: the first is the prominent knoll on the westerly end of the site; the second is the relief of the remainder of the site to the east. The constraint of the knoll will be handled by minimizing the impact to it by designing a road around the sides to the top thereby minimizing the grading but grading the top just enough to create view pads/lots and where the dirt generated will be used in other portions of the site for an on-site balance of earthwork thereby eliminating the possibility of importing or exporting dirt from the site. The easterly portion of the 151 -acre site has a relief of 173 feet: the knoll on the southerly boundary has a high point of approximately 1448 and the flow line at the easterly boundary has a low point of approximately 1275. The design of the site layout could yield view lots of the hills to the north and east. All projects are now constrained by trying to meet the State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements. The Board now requires that projects retain development water on-site through infiltration or harvest and reuse or bio -retention. All three methods of water quality mitigation will be analyzed with the design of Terracina within the Water Quality Management Plan. The site is located within a Very High Fire Hazard Zone of the City's Wildlife Susceptibility Plan of the General Plan. Because of this designation certain mitigation and design features must be incorporated in the land plan design as recommended by a fire suppression consultant who specializes in creating a plan that helps protect the future homes of the project. Such measures as thinning zones, irrigation zones and setbacks will be implemented into the project to assist in the protection of future homes and property. The issues and constraints, as discussed above, can become opportunities. The land uses and densities associated with this Specific Plan have been specifically chosen to provide a variety of lot and home size product type in order to implement the objectives of the City's General Plan and the project proponents. The land use and design components of this plan are further discussed in Section IV. The topographic/grading issues can be addressed in such a manner as to create view opportunities of the Elsinore Mountains to the south and Lake Elsinore to the southeast from the westerly knoll. Home sites in the easterly portions of the site can also be designed as view lots with terrace -grading techniques to create "super -pads" or "villages" with individual identities which are separated from one another both horizontally and vertically. Terra Cotta Road will serve as the main entrance to the site. As another design feature of the project it will be extended northerly to existing Nichols Road. This extension will be used by the future residents - 11 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN I EXHIBIT III - 7 N.T S EXISTING STORM DRAIN IN i LAKESHORE DRIVE pAVIQ, JEFFERS GONSUI TMC INC f. 19 SPFCTRUM POINTE IIHIVF SUITE 609 LAKE PORESI, CP 92630 I9A91 9E 5n8, I'A%. 19,91 596,5521 s `t'-^' Y �\ 1 r y i t tr � / N.T.S. ( y / v /5' Of \ r, — AVERVEi `� 8 EET t th !w/�l�f �'�EI'$7REET % r ell,y ��ir r�/n��, r � l (:j r�Ijjr i it / /y'l ((t �r i r �� v l RpNR r 1,, EXHIBIT III - 6 �\ EXISTING DRAINAGE AREAS r ! DAVID., TR FERS CONSUL TING INC: �I 19 SPecAl<L PRIM[ 0A 9 SV�tr 609 LnNF Foni AX 19 sz586 isasi Sob -578 rnx. Ilan ,ae ssz, numvamameroMwusxv�.om-------------ems III. EXISTING SETTING Water: Domestic water is provided also by Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District which operates existing pipes in and surrounding the project. (Exhibit III -5 "Existing Water Lines".) Under the previously approved project, EVMWD constructed a portion of a water line, fire hydrants and other appurtenances on-site. This water line, fire hydrants and appurtenances do not follow the street design for the proposed Terracina Tentative Tract Map and will, most likely, have to be removed or relocated. Storm Drainage: The existing topography of the site has four (4) main flow areas or tributary areas. (Exhibit III -6 "Existing Drainage Areas".) When constructed, the future development and its drainage patterns should mimic those existing tributary areas so that drainage diversion from one area to another does not occur The project's storm drain system should be designed in such a manner as to keep streets from flooding during a major 100 -year storm event. The system should include underground storm drain pipes of various sizes as well as catch basins in the streets to capture flows for the pipes. There is an existing 42" storm drain in Lakeshore Drive which will serve the westerly portion of the project. (Exhibit 111-7 "Existing Storm Drain in Lakeshore Drive".) Gas: The Southern California Gas Company currently serves neighborhoods surrounding the Terracina site. Once constructed, Terracina will be added to the gas company's service area. Electric: The Southern California Edison Company currently serves neighborhoods surrounding the Terracina site. Once constructed, Terracina will be added to the Edison's service area. TV/Cable: The service area of the existing TV/cable provider will be expanded to include Terracina once contructed. D. Issues, Constraints and Opportunities Issues and constraints involved in the design and development of the site are: economic and zoning, topographic, water quality, land use and fire hazard. The land use design and zoning must be implemented in such a manner that will provide a balanced, quality development. The proposed design under this Specific Plan creates mini -neighborhoods, or villages, within the development which function together to make a cohesive development. -7 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN III EXISTING SETTING C. Public Facilities, Services and Utilities The following public facilities, services and utilities are needed for the implementation of this project as proposed under this Specific Plan: • Police/Sheriff • Fire • Waste Management • Schools • Sewage/Wastewater • Water • Storm Drainage • Gas • Electric • TV/Cable Police/Sheriff: The City of Lake Elsinore Police Department currently services neighborhoods surrounding the Terracina project to the west, south and east. Once constructed, Terracina will be added to the Police Department's service area. Fire: The City of Lake Elsinore Fire Department currently services neighborhoods surrounding the Terracina site to the west, south and east. Once constructed, Terracina will be added to their response area. Waste Management: The waste management company contracting with the City currently serves all neighborhoods surrounding the Terracina project. Once constructed, the service area will be expanded to include Terracina. Schools: The Lake Elsinore Unified School District has existing High Schools, Middle Schools and Elementary schools in neighborhoods surrounding the Terracina project. Students generated from the Terracina project will attend these schools. Sewerage/Wastewater: This utility is provided by Elsinore Valley Water Municipal District which operates and maintains treatment facilities, pump stations and existing pipelines in the surrounding area, which, by extension will serve the Terracina site. A recent sewer area study for the project was prepared by KWC Engineers which discusses the various components needed for service of the site which are further discussed below. The western -most portion of the project proposes a gravity line flowing to an existing sewer line in Lakeshore Drive which then flows in a southeasterly direction to Lift Station 1A. (Exhibit III -4 "Existing Sewer— Lakeshore Drive".) III - 5 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN ga GRADED SLOPE BIOLOGICAL AREA PARK/ REC. CENTER EXHIBIT Ili - 3 / IJ EXISTING BIOLOGICALLY / SENSITIVE AREA / .Ts. �11j 11", � !�nnvn �� r i I!$ C H.Wt d( �i a3'd.� w5eiui iouirw 1 �nUle �� �, ,�M .. TERRACINA-MSHCP iWiTrtl _ AL6ER. CDRL DD APL Er _PJTP� COAANB - 1J11- FA][I � ; K,� 416 4116 A City IL-ake Ell t Q o ARRI5O14A r, r f r•.4 {�BBROOyOA—�-�JGNAY ."�.,ilr '� . ls-�i ^2•,� r. :. {��� 'pI��7`y{:`l r7j ,�' , t 4i a' rl�l`yrf< y>ICy rr: % w.hJ,. �-lyr ,� tiv ti: "7 ryA .F y�ry 9T C1-f11RAVE -•- ��i! r. tyl`: 11! s)f.9`.�1,�'��`S ?�C�.;1��' �4`r�S'�lfdlr� c.,r �� . G' � S�`( �"-i.���%,: Riverside County 1LMA GIS `'� 's ' 1'' °""a, s 1 1-. •,. r a r Selected percel(e): 378A40-004 378.040.005 378-040-008 378-040.007 378-040-012 389-180-001 389-180-002 389.190.002 EXHIBIT III - 2 MSHCP EXHIBIT rpm ItIin1 lLIINGIN( III. EXISTING SETTING III. EXISTING SETTING A. On-site and Surrounding Land Uses There are two existing land uses for the 151 -acre site as referenced in the City's General Plan: Low Density Residential ("LDR") and Low -Medium Density Residential ("LMDR") (Exhibit III -1 "Existing General Plan/Land Use'.) The LDR designation comprises 26.9 acres and is located in the southerly area of the site. The LMDR designation is for the remainder of the site, or 123.9 acres. The maximum lot yield for the low density designation is 3.0 du/ac (dwelling units per acre) while the maximum lot yield for the low medium density designation is 6.0 du/ac., thereby generating a maximum yield for the overall site of 824 dwelling units. The surrounding land uses under the City's General Plan are residential in nature with some areas already developed and built -out. The areas on the northerly side of Terra Cotta Road, the westerly side of Lakeshore Drive, the southerly side of Dryden Street and the easterly side of Stoddard Street are all existing residential land uses. All other areas surrounding the site consist of existing scattered residential or vacant lands ultimately planned for residential development, Criteria cells identified in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan borders the project site on the north, (Exhibit III -2: "MSHCP Exhibit".) This area under the MSHCP is called out as Group U and Criteria Cell 4157. The MSHCP was created for the conservation of species and allows development within its boundaries only under certain conditions. This proposed project and Specific Plan is not within the boundaries of the Cell Group or Criteria Cell. B. Environmental Setting A considerable number of environmental studies, reports and permitting were prepared for the previously approved Tentative Tract Map and were updated for this new proposed Specific Plan. The discussion below is borrowed from those previously approved and updated documents. The Existing Biologically Sensitive Area in Village 3 is 3.8 gross acres (including the graded slopes) and 2.3 net acres in size. In addition to the biological sensitivity, the area also preserves portions of wetland features as defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Service. (Exhibit III -3: "Existing Biologically Sensitive Area".) The wetland features and biologically sensitive nature of the site is described in updated reports prepared by Glenn Lukos Associates, Ill - 1 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN 11. INTRODUCTION Goal 5 Encourages a wide variety of open space and recreational opportunities that are integrated within adopted master planned communities and future developments. Policies AH5.1 Encourage the creation of an extensive system of open space and preservation lands throughout the Alberhill district to ensure a healthy balance between development and the natural environment. AH5.2 Support joint -use of recreational facilities with the Lake Elsinore Union School District. AH5.3 Pedestrian and hiking trails shall be considered between neighborhoods and surrounding open space and MSHCP preservation areas. CONSISTENCY: The Terracina project provides for the preservation of natural open space and biologically sensitive areas, and the construction of a centrally located amenitized park facility. Bicycle lanes will be provided throughout the Terracina development within all local street rights-of-way and the perimeter arterials of Lakeshore Drive and Terra Cotta Road. TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II INTRODUCTION CONSISTENCY: A consultant who specializes in analyzing cultural and historical resources and during a site reconnaissance found no such resources on-site and, therefore, Terracina is consistent with the stated goal and policies. 1.6.1 Goals and Policies Goal 4 Support a multi -modal transportation system with connections to new development, Interstate 15, recreational and open space areas, and districts to the south that serve the needs of residents. Policies AH4.1 The interchange at Lake Street and 1-15 shall be improved to meet the future traffic demand and satisfy the minimum level of service required by the City. AH4.2 Through the project and CEQA processes identify and require improvements to Lake Street and Nichols Road as the most significant roadways within the Alberhill District for transit, landscaping, pedestrian travel, and bikeways. AH4.3 Through the project and CEQA processes require the construction or expansion of roadways serving new developments located east and west of Lake Street. AH4.4 Lake Street shall be constructed in accordance with Urban Arterial standards. AH4.5 Encourage the use of traffic -calming measures within commercial and institutional developments along Lake Street when recommended by traffic studies. CONSISTENCY Terracina plays an integral part in the connectivity of the transportation system of the region by expanding Lakeshore Drive on its southerly boundary and extending Terra Cotta Road to Nichols Road on the north approximately one-half mile off-site. These two arterial roadways increase the total lane -miles for traffic making its way to the 1-15 Freeway via Lake Street (one-half mile to the west) and Nichols Road (one-half mile to the north.) 1.7.1 Goals and Policies II - 36 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN It. INTRODUCTION AH2.2 In areas outside approved specific plans, the City should strive to establish design standards that are consistent with the Alberhill District's adopted specific plans in order to ensure a standard design motif for new developments. AH2.3 Consider the establishment and construction of a series of pedestrian routes as part of the City's trail system from residential areas to Lake Street's commercial and institutional uses and to the open space and MSHCP areas to the north, west, and southeast areas of the Alberhill District. AH2.4 Support the placement of community identification signs along the commercial/institutional uses and intersections along Lake Street and I- 15. AH2.5 Encourage the use of distinctive trees along Lake Street identified in the City's Street Tree Program. CONSISTENCY: Terracina, although topographically isolated from the central Alberhill District, is but a short distance northerly on Lakeshore Drive from its main arterial of Lake Street located to the west of the project. This Specific Plan, through its Design Guidelines and Regulations, provides for similar construction techniques, materials used and landscaping palettes as used in other established areas of the District. 1.5.1 Goals and Policies Goal 3 Preserve and enhance the cultural and historical resources of the Alberhill District. Policies AH3.1 Support the relocation and restoration of the Alberhill School as a 20,000 square foot community center promoting education awareness of the District's cultural heritage including mining, homesteading, the railroad, and the Terra Cotta town. AH3.2 Support educational awareness programs that inform residents and visitors of the District's cultural heritage. AH3.3 Encourage the use of signs within recreational areas along Lake Street depicting the Alberhill District's historical and cultural significance. TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II. INTRODUCTION Policies AH1.1 Continue to encourage proper reclamation and enhancement of areas impacted by extractive/mining activities for the public's health, safety and welfare. AH1.2 Consider the preservation of vacant lands in areas with high elevations in the north, east and southwest in order to provide an adequate amount of conserved lands, open space and wetland areas. AH1.3 Encourage proper land use compatibility between mining activities and surrounding uses. AH1.4 Impose conditions, as necessary, on mining operations to minimize or eliminate the potential adverse impact of mining operations on surrounding properties and the environment. AH1.5 Encourage new non -mining land uses adjacent to existing mining operations to provide an adequate buffer with a buffer distance from mining operations based on an evaluation of: noise, aesthetics, drainage, operating conditions and operating hours, biological resources, topography, lighting, traffic and air quality. AH1.6 Periodically revise and reclamation ordinance to ensure are reflected in the City's code, CONSISTENCY: update the City's surface mining the most recent SMARA developments Terracina is located at the southerly end of the Alberhill District and away from the prominent mining activities in the north -central portions of the District. As such, Terracina proposes no mining activities. Topographically, Terracina, a residential development is naturally buffered from the mining activities by a major, hilly land form to its northerly side. This natural feature provides for an ideal buffer against noises, operating conditions, lighting, traffic and air quality issues associated with mining. 1.4.1 Goals and Policies Goal 2 Create a strong urban design that would support the Alberhill District as a distinct community. Policies AH2.1 Through the project and CEQA processes create strong connections to Lake Street between neighborhoods and community supporting uses. 11-34 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN 11. INTRODUCTION Grading and landscape plans prepared for Terracina will show a re - vegetation scheme approved by the City according to the City's Landscape Design Guidelines to minimize hillside scarring. 4.9.2 Sustainable Environment Goal and Policies Goal 14 Reduce greenhouse gas emissions from all activities within the City boundaries to support the State's efforts under AB -32 and to mitigate the impact of climate change on the City, State and world. Policies 14.1 By 2020, the City will reduce greenhouse gas emissions from within its boundaries to 1990 levels consistent with AB 32. 14.2 Measures shall be established that aim to reduce emissions generated from City uses, community uses (community actions) and new development (City discretionary actions). 14.3 The City shall strive to increase public awareness of climate change and climate protection challenges. 14.4 The City will participate in the Sustainable Communities Strategy/Regional Blueprint Planning effort to ensure that local plans are consistent with the Regional Plan. CONSISTENCY (Refer to Section IV.F "Climate Action Plan" of this Specific Plan.) ALBERHILL DISTRICT 1.3.3 Overall District Goal and Policies Goal 1 The primary goal of the Alberhill District is to support and maintain a healthy transition from extractive/mining activities to a network of residential communities with a balanced mix of residential, commercial, light industrial, business professional, and institutional/public uses that provide a sense of place and high quality of life. 11-33 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II. INTRODUCTION 12.5 Consider petitioning Caltrans to take control of portions of the SR -74 corridor, in order to promote signage and landscaping that enhance and preserve the corridor's aesthetic setting. �ta]P69E.�i�P[H'I The Terracina design concept proposes to take advantage of an otherwise challenging topographic site by creating the maximum number of view lots which capture view -shed opportunities of the lake to the southeast, the Elsinore Mountains to the west and the hill areas to the west and north. Terracina's terraced grading techniques and super -pads on the eastern portions of the site create view lots at the top of a slope which is a minimum of 20' high, providing views over the adjacent homes and village below. Almost all of the lots designed around the westerly knoll have views of the lake and/or mountains as the local street winds its way up the sides to its upper portions. Views of the lake and mountains from the top of this knoll are some of the most spectacular in the City. Terracina will have a hierarchy of entry monumentation and landscaping features. The entry off of Terra Cotta Road will be designed in such a manner as to depict it as the primary entry and a statement of "arrival" for the project. Other entries will be secondary in nature with less landscaping features. Goal 13 Minimize activities, development, and landform modification that could distract viewers from the City's visual character. Policies 13.1 Discourage extractive activity from being conducted in highly visible areas and require reclamation of these mining areas. If such uses must occur in visible areas, the City shall require extensive visual screening with landscaping and/or fencing. 13.2 Discourage extractive uses or development that entails excessive light and glare visible from private and public viewpoints. 13.3 Require grading plans for any hillside development to include specifications for revegetation and new planting to minimize hillside scarring. W26161i:110B]1 Instead of completely removing the prominent knoll land form on the southerly portion of the site, Terracina's design preserves the majority of this topographic feature by aligning a road around its side to the top while creating value and view opportunities for the future residents of the lake and mountains. II - 32 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II. INTRODUCTION 11.4 Incorporate the City's identification symbol into street signage, planters, benches, public buildings, City vehicles, streetscape furnishings, and other appropriate applications. 11.5 Support a high level of Code Enforcement to encourage neighborhood beautification and to maintain property values and quality of life. 11.6 Coordinate with agencies to screen, landscape and otherwise obscure or integrate public utility facilities, including electric power substations, domestic water and irrigation wells, switching and control facilities. 11.7 Promote and facilitate the placement of public art that creates a unique setting and enhances a cultural and aesthetic character throughout the City. CONSISTENCY: The Terracina plan preserves the majority of the visually appealing natural open space of the prominent knoll feature in the southerly portion of the site adjacent to Lakeshore Drive. And as such, substantial vegetation will remain in its natural condition as well. Terracina will propose a pleasing landscape palette throughout the development in the street parkway landscaping, graded slopes, parks, recreation center and drainage basins. The landscaping scheme for the project will obscure irrigation boxes, electrical panels and other utility features without interfering with the access needed by the utility companies. Goal 12 Preserve valued public views throughout the City. Policies 12.1 Encourage development designs and concepts that provide public views of Lake Elsinore and local ridgelines through proper siting, building design, and landscape design. 12.2 Encourage the dedication of open space land in hillside development proposals to preserve and enhance view opportunities from transportation corridors and surrounding development. 12.3 Encourage new development and redevelopment to incorporate views of Lake Elsinore from roadways and other public spaces that provide residents and tourists with scenic vistas to the water, marinas, and lakeshore activities. 12.4 Establish a series of City and community gateways and entry statements to promote the visual character of the Districts. -31 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN _ II. INTRODUCTION preservation. The City's General Plan exhibit Historical Resources shows an "unrecorded Historic Mine Location" near the Terracina site but not within its boundaries. Goal 10 Encourage the preservation, protection, and restoration of historical and cultural resources. Policies 10.1 Continue to implement the Historic Preservation Guidelines that guide historic preservation efforts as set forth in the Historic Elsinore Design Guidelines and the Downtown Master Plan. 10.2 Integrate historic and cultural resources in land use planning processes where feasible to avoid conflict between the preservation of historic resources and alternative land uses. 10.3 All City -owned sites designated as historical resources should be maintained in a manner that is consistent with the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. 10.4 Encourage owners of historic resources to utilize federal incentives including Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credits, fagade and conservation easements, and to coordinate with the State Historic Preservation Office. CONSISTENCY: (Refer to previous consistency comments regarding Goals 6, 7, 8, and 9) 4.8.3 Aesthetics Goals and Policies Goal 11 Provide and maintain a natural and built environment that is visually pleasing to City residents and visitors. Policies 11.1 For new developments and redevelopment, encourage the maintenance and incorporation of existing mature trees and other substantial vegetation on the site, whether naturally -occurring or planted, into the landscape design. 11.2 Maintain and improve the quality of existing landscaping in parkways, parks, civic facilities, rights -of -ways, and other public open areas. 11.3 Where appropriate, encourage new planting of native and/or non- invasive ornamental plants to enhance the scenic setting of public and private lands. II - 30 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II. INTRODUCTION CONSISTENCY: The stated goal and policies do not apply to the Terracina project Goal 8 Preserve paleontological resources occurring within the City. Policy 8.1 For development in areas delineated as "High" or "Undetermined" potential sensitivity for paleontological resources, require the project applicant to hire a certified paleontologist, who must perform a literature search and/or survey and apply the relevant treatment for the site as recommended by the Society for Vertebrate Paleontology. CONSISTENCY: The City's General Plan exhibit for Paleontological Resources shows the Terracina site located within a "High A "(HA)" area. However, a site reconnaissance revealed no resources needing preservation. 4.7.3 Historical Preservation Goals and Policies Goal 9 Assure the recognition of the City's heritage through preservation of the City's significant historical sites and structures. Policies 9.1 Require the developer to obtain a professional, qualified historian to conduct a literature search and/or survey for any project that entails demolition or modification of an existing structure that may be of historical value in relation to the City's cultural heritage. 9.2 Apply the General Plan "Historic Elsinore Design Standards' to the Lake Elsinore historic district, as defined in the City zoning ordinance. 9.3 Work with the Lake Elsinore Historical Society to create and periodically update a historic register of structures and other landmarks valuable to the cultural heritage to the City. 9.4 Where historic structures that do not possess a meaningful association with the immediate surroundings are identified within the City, the City shall consider allowing relocation of the structure to an appropriate site. CONSISTENCY: A consulting firm specializing in historical preservation and after site reconnaissance found no historical sites or structures which need 11-29 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN IL INTRODUCTION items and items of cultural patrimony reflect traditional religious beliefs and practices, developers shall waive any and all claims to ownership and agree to return all Native American ceremonial items and items of cultural patrimony that may be found on a project site to the appropriate tribe for treatment. It is understood by all parties that unless otherwise required by law, the site of any reburial of Native American human remains or cultural artifacts shall not be disclosed and shall not be governed by public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. 6.4 If archeological excavations are recommended on a project site, the City shall require that all such investigations include Native American consultation, which shall occur prior to project approval. CONSISTENCY: The cultural resources survey prepared for Terracina found no sites or artifacts needing preservation. An SB 18 consultation was completed and the project will comply with general plan policies if cultural resources are discovered during project construction. Goal 7 Support state-of-the-art research designs and analytical approaches to archeological and cultural resource investigations while also acknowledging the traditional knowledge and experience of the Native American tribes regarding Native American culture. Policies 7.1 Consult with California Native American tribes prior to decision- making processes for the purpose of preserving cultural places located on land within the City's jurisdiction that may be affected by the proposed plan, in accordance with State or Federal requirements. 7.2 Continue to identify, document, evaluate, designate, and preserve the cultural resources in the City. 7.3 Continue to update a citywide inventory of cultural resources in conformance with state standards and procedures while maintaining the confidentiality of information as required by law. 7.4 Support the permanent curation of archaeological artifact collections by universities or museums or appropriate tribal facilities. 7.5 Increase opportunities for cultural heritage tourism by promoting the history of Lake Elsinore to attract cultural heritage travelers while maintaining the confidentiality of Native American sites, places and other information as required by law. II - 28 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN H. INTRODUCTION 4.5.3 Mineral Resources Goal and Policies Goal 5 Balance the importance of conserving mineral resource areas that have been determined to be significant, the need for extracted materials for local construction, and the potential impacts and conflicts that may result. Policies 5.1 The City shall consider the public benefits in allowing extraction activities of mineral resources when making land use decisions. 5.2 The City shall require mined property to be left in a condition suitable for reuse in conformance with the General Plan land use designations and the California Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA). 5.3 The City shall encourage the reuse and recycling of existing aggregate construction material for new residential, commercial and industrial development. CONSISTENCY: There are no significant mineral resources found on the Terracina project site which need to be conserved. Chapter 4.0 Resource Protection and Preservation — Part 11 4.6.8 Cultural and Paleontological Resources Goals and Policies Goal 6 Preserve, protect, and promote the cultural heritage of the City and surrounding region for the education and enjoyment of all City residents and visitors, as well as for the advancement of historical and archeological knowledge. Policies 6.1 Encourage the preservation of significant archeological, historical, and other cultural resources located within the City. 6.2 The City shall consult with the appropriate Native American tribes for projects identified under SB 18 (Traditional Tribal Cultural Places). 6.3 When significant cultural/archeological sites or artifacts are discovered on a site, coordination with professional archeologists, relevant state and, if applicable, federal agencies, and the appropriate Native American tribes regarding preservation of sites or professional retrieval and preservation of artifacts or by other means of protection, prior to development of the site shall be required. Because ceremonial TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II. INTRODUCTION CONSISTENCY The existing knoll in the southerly portion of the site will be treated in a sensitive manner by the design of a circular road traversing its sides, thereby leaving the majority of its sides in a natural open space condition protecting the visual experiences of existing residents in the area and future residents of Terracina. 4.4.3 Water Resources Goal and Policies Goal 4 Improve water quality and ensure the water supply is not degraded as a result of urbanization of the City. Policies 4.1 Encourage developers to provide clean water systems that reduce pollutants being discharged into the drainage system to the maximum extent feasible and meet required federal National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards. 4.2 Support public education and awareness programs to reduce pollutant discharges into the drainage system. 4.3 Require Best Management Practices through project conditions of approval for development to meet the Federal NPDES permit requirements. 4.4 The City shall utilize the 1998 North American Vertical Datum to be consistent with the national standard for mean sea level, which would increase the measurement of the mean sea level for Lake Elsinore by approximately 2.4 feet. CONSISTENCY The Terracina project proponents have contracted with a civil engineering consulting firm which specializes in the preparation of Water Quality Management Plans. Mitigation is proposed in the preliminary WQMP prepared for the project site which reduces pollutants exiting the site. Infiltration of storm water is required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. If site soils do not allow infiltration, additional measures such as basins, must be proposed as mitigation and to reduce pollutants before the flows can leave the site. Through the approval process the project builder will be conditioned to mitigate pollutants through the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan as required by NPDES. II - 26 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II. INTRODUCTION Policies 2.1 Biological resources analyses of proposed projects shall include discussion of potential impacts to any plant or wildlife species that is officially listed as threatened or endangered by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and/or the California Department of Fish and Game but not covered by the MSHCP. 2.2 Development or modification shall be discouraged in areas containing riparian habitat of high functions and values or corridors with 80% or more of natural native habitat that link larger patches of natural native habitat containing 80% or more native plant species. Further, development in areas described for conservation, including areas planned for riparian/riverine restoration included in the MSHCP, shall also be discouraged. 2.3 The City shall encourage the development of a Native Tree Planting and Maintenance Program that presents guidelines for selecting and locating trees to support wildlife, improve air and water quality, and reduce energy consumption. CONSISTENCY: In compliance with this goal and policies, biological studies discussing the location, impacts to and mitigation provided for any threatened or endangered species, and consistent with the MSHCP, have been prepared for the Terracina project . The Terracina plan proposes to preserve the only area on-site that has value as a biological habitat which is located in Village 3. 4.3.4 Open Space Goal and Policies Goal 3 Provide an open space layout within the City that will enhance the recreational and visual experiences of all City residents and visitors. Policies 3.1 Maximize the MSHCP conservation areas and other open space that is available for public use. 3.2 The City shall ensure that passive and active open space uses are incorporated into development areas. 3.3 Development on steep slopes in public or private property shall require contour grading. 3.4 Preserve the City's visual character, in particular the surrounding hillsides, which topographically define the lake region. -25 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II INTRODUCTION or dumping in the Conservation Areas while not impeding wildlife movement. 1.3 The City's Conceptual Reserve Design shall be developed in accordance with Section 3.2.3 of the MSHCP as amended, and may rely upon the flexibility permitted by the MSHCP where appropriate in conducting the Reserve Assembly Accounting set forth in Section 6.7 of the MSHCP. 1.4 Encourage revegetation with native plants compatible with natural surrounding habitat where soils have been disturbed during construction, and discourage plants identified in the MSHCP as unsuitable for conservation areas. 1.5 The City shall coordinate with the Regional Conservation Authority to have that agency acquire native habitat areas as permanent open space and allow public trail access where appropriate. 1.6 The City shall establish a plan for a trail network intended for active or passive use within public open space areas and traversing around and through MSHCP Conservation areas where compatible with guidelines set forth in the MSHCP and City Council MSHCP policies. 1.7 The City shall require all new trails, trailheads, conservation signage, interpretive centers, and maintenance facilities established within MSHCP Conservation areas to follow the Guidelines for the Siting and Design of Trails and Facilities, as set forth in Section 7.4.2 of the MSHCP. 1.8 The City shall consult with the Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) and adjacent jurisdictions to ensure proper adherence to MSHCP guidelines and to allow for a maximum level of regional interconnection of trails systems. The City shall reduce, modify or add to the regional interconnections and linkages based on new biological analysis brought forward during the CEQA and LEAP processes. CONSISTENCY: The Terracina plan proposes a cohesive blend of residential open space and recreational land uses while conserving a sensitive biological habitat area in Village 3. The site is not located within a Critical Cell of the County's MSHCP nor within the City's conceptual Reserve Design and, therefore, Terracina is not required to conserve any lands under these programs. Goal 2 Protect sensitive plant and wildlife species residing or occurring within the City. 11-24 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II. INTRODUCTION area of service to include the Terracina project. Therefore, once the residents of the Terracina project has been accepted into the service area of the hauler, they will be provided with information on a monthly basis regarding any public education programs in recycling and source reduction. 3.8.14 Telecommunications Goal and Policies Goal 14 Encourage the pursuit of state of the art Information Technology. Policies 14.1 Encourage the use of information technology as a communication tool to improve personal convenience, reduce dependency on nonrenewable resources, take advantage of ecological and financial efficiencies of new technologies. 14.2 Maintain and update the City's website with information about current events and issues, key leadership figures, community involvement opportunities, and educational tools such as solid waste management techniques and emergency preparedness programs. CONSISTENCY: The stated goal and policies do not apply to the Terracina project Chapter 4.0 - Resource Protection and Preservation — Part 1 4.2.5 Biological Resources Goals and Policies Goal 1 Identify and conserve important biological habitats where feasible while balancing the economic growth and private property right interests of the City, its residents, and landowners. Policies 1.1 The City shall continue to participate in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, the LEAPS program, and the Implementing Agreement; with a strategy that focuses on quality assemblage of conservation acreage. The City shall work toward the lower end of the conservation acreage range as promised by the County during the adoption of the MSHCP by the City. 1.2 Evaluate the installation of barrier fencing or other buffers between MSHCP Conservation Areas and proposed public and private land uses that may be incompatible with the Conservation Areas in order to minimize illegal/unauthorized public access, domestic animal predation, TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II. INTRODUCTION Policies 12.1 Coordinate with the utility agencies to provide for the continued maintenance, development and expansion of electricity, natural gas, and telecommunications systems to serve residents and businesses. 12.2 Encourage developers to contact Southern California Edison early in their planning process, especially for large-scale residential and non- residential development or specific plans, to ensure the projected electric loads for these projects are factored into SCE's load forecasts for the community. 12.3 Encourage developers to incorporate energy efficient design measures into their projects and pursue available energy efficiency assistance programs from SCE and other utility agencies. CONSISTENCY: Providing sewer, water and recycled water for Terracina are the responsibility of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. Recycled water will not be required by EVMWD. Sewer and water service will be provided for each home and maintained by EVMWD after construction of the facilities and occupancy of the homes. Gas and electric services will be provided to each home in Terracina and similarly will be turned over to Southern California Gas Company and Southern California Edison Company, respectively, for maintenance of the system after construction and occupancy of each home. 3.8.12 Trash and Recycling Goal and Policies Goal 13 Encourage the City's franchise trash hauler(s) to provide and expand service for the collection, storage, transportation, recovery, and disposal of solid waste to meet the needs of the City. Policies 13.1 Request the City's franchise trash hauler(s) to establish long-term solid waste management plans that include goals for recycling and source reduction programs. 13.2 Request that the City's franchise trash hauler(s) provide a public education program in recycling and source reduction techniques for homes, businesses, and construction. CONSISTENCY: It is anticipated that the City's franchise trash hauler which currently provides service to the existing surrounding community will expand its 11-22 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II. INTRODUCTION CONSISTENCY: The Lake Elsinore Unified School District regional facilities plan does not show the need for the location of a school (i.e. elementary, middle, high school) within the Terracina site. Although there are no school facilities proposed within the project site the developer is required by law to pay school mitigation fees for the project. 3.8.6 Libraries Goal Goal 10 Encourage the County of Riverside's County/City Public Library System to provide adequate library facilities for City residents. CONSISTENCY The Terracina land uses and design do not provide for the location of a library within its boundaries. 3.8.8 Animal Services Goal and Policies Goal 11 Provide high quality animal control services to ensure timely response and effective control that protect both citizens and animals. Policies 11.1 Continue to foster and participate in the operation of a regional animal control facility through participation in the South Western Communities Financing Authority. 11.2 Continue to develop an educational program in conjunction with Animal Friends of the Valley regarding animal control services, including spay and neuter programs. CONSISTENCY: The subject goal and policies do not apply to the Terracina project. 3.8.10 Utilities Goal and Policies Goal 12 Ensure that adequate electrical, natural gas and telecommunications systems are provided to meet the demand of new and existing development. II - 21 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II. INTRODUCTION 3.8.2 Fire and Police/Law Enforcement Goal and Policies Goal 8 Provide efficient and effective public safety services for the community. Policies 8.1 Continue to follow Riverside County Fire Department most current guidelines to achieve standard response times and staffing levels. 8.2 Coordinate with the County of Riverside to provide adequate police service and staffing levels. 8.3 Continue to provide Lake Patrol personnel who enforce boating rules and regulations, and perform rescue tactics. 8.4 Promote the establishment of programs such as Neighborhood Watch and Crime -Free Multi -Housing in conjunction with law enforcement agencies to encourage community participation in the surveillance of neighborhoods. CONSISTENCY Public safety services are provided for the community by the City and County regarding their respective disciplines. From a neighborhood perspective, Terracina will comply with the City's requirement to form a Neighborhood Watch program in its villages in conjunction with and as required by local law enforcement/sheriff agencies. 3.8.4 Schools Goal and Policies Goal 9 Encourage all school districts serving Lake Elsinore to provide school facilities that are adequate to serve all students. Policies 9.1 Encourage the establishment and development of a trade school, junior college, and/or four-year college campus within the City boundaries. 9.2 Continue cooperation between school districts and the City to provide joint use of recreational facilities. 11-20 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II. INTRODUCTION Overlay District adopted by the City of Lake Elsinore Zoning Code. The City may require site-specific remediation measures during permit review that may be implemented to minimize impacts in these areas. CONSISTENCY: A geotechnical report was prepared for Terracina. That report found that there are no geologic issues associated with the project which cannot be mitigated to the satisfaction of the State of California and City guidelines and codes and which would cause the loss of life, injury, property damage and economic and social displacement. 3.7.3 Noise Goal and Policies Goal 7 Maintain an environment for all City residents and visitors free of unhealthy, obtrusive, or otherwise excessive noise. Policies 7.1 Apply the noise standards set forth in the Lake Elsinore Noise and Land Use Compatibility Matrix (see Table 3-1) and Interior and Exterior Noise Standards (see Table 3-2) when considering all new development and redevelopment proposed within the City. 7.2 Require that mixed-use structures and areas be designed to prevent transfer of noise and vibration from commercial areas to residential areas 7.3 Strive to reduce the effect of transportation noise on the 1-15. 7.4 Consider estimated roadway noise contours based upon Figure 3.6, Noise Contours, when making land use design decisions along busy roadways throughout the City. CONSISTENCY The Terracina project consists of land uses of residential, recreational and open space which are not considered to be excessive noise producers when constructed. Noise from construction is considered short- term and only during normal hourly construction periods. As such, the construction can only take place during daytime hours to minimize noise impacts during sensitive morning and evening hours. Terracina will be required to mitigate any interior and exterior noise to a level of acceptability especially along Lakeshore Drive as defined by the City's General Plan: 45 LDN for interior and 60 LDN for exterior noise levels. Some homes along this Lakeshore Drive corridor may be required to mitigate noise levels to a level of acceptability by such means as constructing concrete block walls for exterior noise levels and double paned glass for certain exposed windows for interior noise levels. 11 - 19 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II. INTRODUCTION susceptible to fires due to prevailing winds and the proximity to homes within the project. Other mitigations include non-combustible roof materials, non-combustible materials and structures (e.g. sheds) in rear and side yards of residences as well as sprinkler systems in the fuel modification zones of rear and side yards. (Refer to "Fuel Modification Plan".) 3.5.1 Flooding and Floodplains Goal and Policies Goal 5 Minimize risk of injury to residents and visitors, and property damage due to flooding. Policies 5.1 Continue to ensure that new construction in floodways and Floodplains conforms to all applicable provisions of the National Flood Insurance Program in order to protect buildings and property from flooding. 5.2 Utilize the Capital Improvement Program for storm drainage projects and maintenance and improvement of local storm drain systems including channels, pipes, and inlets to ensure capacity for maximum runoff flows. CONSISTENCY: Although the Terracina project is not located in or near any mapped floodway or flood plain areas, the developer has contracted with a civil engineer and hydrology consultant to address local drainage flows from the site. This local storm drain system of underground pipes will be constructed by the ultimate builder of Terracina and maintained by the City of Lake Elsinore. These on-site pipes will be sized to handle the flows throughout the site. 3.6.3 Seismic Activity Goal and Policies Goal 6 Minimize the rise of loss of life, injury, property damage, and economic and social displacement due to seismic and geological hazards resulting from earthquakes and geological constraints. Policies 6.1 Encourage the pursuit of federal and state programs that assist in the seismic upgrading of buildings to meet building and safety codes. 6.2 Continue to require Alquist-Priolo and other seismic analyses be conducted for new development to identify the potential for ground shaking, liquefaction, slope failure, seismically induced landslides, expansion and settlement of soils, and other related geologic hazards for areas of new development in accordance with the Fault Rupture Hazard II - 18 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II. INTRODUCTION CONSISTENCY The Terracina project is a residential construction project and not a hazardous waste generator, does not anticipate the use, or therefore, require the disposal of toxic or hazardous materials. Future residents of Terracina who may use such items as gasoline, pesticides and some household cleaning products are, under normal homeowner circumstances of use, considered a minor threat to others within the City. 3.4.1 Wildfire Hazards Goal and Policies Goal 4 Adhere to an integrated approach to minimizing the threat of wildland fires to protect life and property using pre -fire management, suppression, and post -fire management. Policies 4.1 Require on-going brush clearance and establish low fuel landscaping policies to reduce combustible vegetation along the urban/wildland interface boundary. 4.2 Create fuel modification zones around development within high hazard areas by thinning or clearing combustible vegetation within 100 feet of buildings and structures. The fuel modification zone size may be altered with the addition of fuel resistant building techniques. The fuel modification zone may be replanted with fire-resistant material for aesthetics and erosion control. 4.3 Establish fire resistant building techniques for new development such as non-combustible wall surfacing materials, fire -retardant treated wood, heavy timber construction, glazing, Country Club Heights Fire enclosed materials and features, insulation without paper -facing, and automatic fire sprinklers. 4.4 Encourage programs that educate citizens about the threat of human wildfire origination from residential practices such as outdoor barbeques and from highway use such as cigarette littering. CONSISTENCY: The Terracina site is located within a Very High Fire Hazard Zone as shown in the City's General Plan exhibit for Wildfire Susceptibility. As such, the developers have contracted with a fire suppression company specializing in creating mitigation to minimize the effects of wildland fires on the residents and homes within Terracina. The report and study for Terracina recommends the reduction of combustible vegetation by means of fuel modification and thinning zones in certain areas of the site most II - 17 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PIAN II. INTRODUCTION Policies 2.1 Support the SCAQMD in its development of improved ambient air quality monitoring capabilities and establishment of standards, thresholds, and rules to address, and where necessary mitigate, the air quality impacts of new development. 2.2 Support programs that educate the public about regional air quality issues, opportunities and solutions. 2.3 Evaluate the purchase of alternative fuel vehicles for official City vehicles. CONSISTENCY: The stated goal and policies do not apply to the Terracina project 3.3.3 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Goal and Policies Goal 3 Reduce the level of risk associated with the use, transport, treatment, and disposal of hazardous materials to protect the community's safety, health, and natural resources. Policies 3.1 Continue to require hazardous waste generators to implement a waste reduction program per the Riverside County Hazardous Waste Management Plan with necessary inspections per the Riverside County Hazardous Materials Handlers Program, 3.2 Require any proposed development within close proximity to an active and/or inactive landfill to complete a technical analysis that focuses on public safety and hazard issues. The analysis shall be prepared by a professional consultant. 3.3 Encourage the safe disposal of hazardous materials with County agencies to protect the City against a hazardous materials incident. 3.4 Continue operating household hazardous waste education and collection programs in collaboration with the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health. 3.5 Evaluate new development on or adjacent to the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) line requiring extensive subsurface components or containing sensitive land uses such as schools on a project -by -project basis to determine impacts if an accident occurs. II - 16 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II. INTRODUCTION Policy 9.1 Encourage public and private systems that interface with other existing and proposed trails (i.e., bikeways) assuring links with the City, County of Riverside, and state recreational facilities. CONSISTENCY: The City's Trails Master Plan does not show for the construction of any Regional Trail, Lake, River or Levee Trail, Community Trails, Historic Trail or Loop Trail within the boundaries of the Terracina site. However, trails in the form of bikeways and sidewalks will be constructed within the right-of- way of perimeter streets for Lakeshore Drive and Terra Cotta Road. In addition, neighborhood bikeways and sidewalks will be constructed within the rights-of-way for all on-site local streets to allow for connectivity with the arterial streets mentioned above thereby providing more direct access to nearby schools, markets and City-wide recreational facilities such as the lake and the inter -connectivity of the project's various Villages. Chapter 3.0 - Public Safety and Welfare 3.2.3 Air Quality Goals and Policies Goal 1 Continue to coordinate with the Air Quality Management District and the City's Building Department to reduce the amount of fugitive dust that is emitted into the atmosphere from unpaved areas, parking lots, and construction sites. Policv 1.1 Continue to implement requirements identified in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). CONSISTENCY The Terracina project will be required to follow AQMD's guidelines and the City's project Conditions of Approval to minimize fugitive dust by watering during grading operations for the project. The Engineering and Building and Safety Departments of the City will require the Terracina builder to prepare and have approved a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan to meet the requirements of the NPDES. Goal 2 Work with regional and state governments to develop effective mitigation measures to improve air quality. II - 15 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II. INTRODUCTION 8.2 Ensure parkland and recreation facilities support new development through acquisition and/or dedication. Meet the requirement of the Park Capital Improvement Fund, Resolution No. 91-42 and the Quimby Act by acquiring five (5) acres of useable park land per 1,000 population. 8.3 Explore the use of public-private partnerships, corporate sponsorships, and leasing agreements that provide for additional parks and recreational facilities, and other programs including cooperation with applicable school districts to allow joint use of facilities. 8.4 Consider the addition of a centralized forum for community activities such as a convention center, amphitheater, cultural arts center, or waterfront promenade. 8.5 Continue to develop public beach lands and recreational facilities such as campgrounds, boat launch areas, and water access to the Diamond Stadium, to complement the state and county recreation system. 8.6 Encourage the development of private recreational facilities within residential and mixed use developments. 8.7 Ensure that recreation facilities are accessible to the elderly, children, and persons with disabilities as set forth in the Americans with Disabilities Act including increased wheelchair access, height variations on drinking fountains, and any other requirements necessary to serve these individuals. CONSISTENCY: Although the City's Parks and Recreation Master Plan does not show for the location of a public park within the Terracina site, Terracina does propose a private recreational facility and park area within Village 3. The builders of Terracina will be required to comply with the Quimby Act of the State of California and the ADA requirement. The Quimby Act allows for developer fees to be paid in lieu of dedication parklands. Terracina will provide for dedication of land and improvements in Village 3. The Terracina project is not consistent with Policy 8.2 requirement of 5 acres of usable park land per 1,000 populations, (i.e. 7.9 acres of usable park land based upon 468 dwelling units and 3.37 persons per dwelling unit.) Goal 9 Establish a primary trail network for equestrians and hikers. II - 14 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II. INTRODUCTION and further off-site to Nichols Road, the off-site extension of Hoff Avenue to Terra Cotta Road, the expansion of additional travel lanes for Lakeshore Drive and traffic signals as warranted in the project traffic report, all in an effort to optimize and implement the Transportation system within the City by way of its General Plan. All sight distance design requirements, the number of access points into the project and bike lanes proposed in arterial and local street rights-of- way will comply with City codes, policies and standards. The project also provides for connections to the regional circulation network by being in close proximity to Lake Street which intersects with the 1-15 Freeway and by the extension of Terra Cotta Road to Nichols Road which also intersects with the 1-15 Freeway, thereby moving people and goods more efficiently to and from the City. 2.5.2 Growth Management Goal and Policy Goal 7 Maintain orderly, efficient patterns of growth that enhance the quality of life for the residents of Lake Elsinore. Policy 7.1 Encourage mixed-use developments to reduce public service costs and environmental impacts through compatible land use relationships, and efficient circulation and open space systems. CONSISTENCY The Terracina plan follows the orderly and efficient patterns of growth by complying with the land uses allocated for the site in the General Plan. The quality of life will be enhanced for future Terracina residents due to the cohesive community village concept implemented into the site design coupled with the amenities of parks, open space, a recreation center, efficient circulation patterns and proximity to existing City services, public facilities and recreational facilities. 2.7.3 Parks and Recreation Goals and Policies Goal 8 Maintain an adequate quantity, quality, type, and distribution of parks and recreational facilities throughout the City that serve the current and future needs of residents and visitors. Policies 8.1 Continue to utilize the City of Lake Elsinore Parks and Recreation Master Plan as a guide for decision-making and implementation of the Parks and Recreation Program. TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II INTRODUCTION 3.2 Encourage new commercial and/or industrial developments incorporate buffers which minimize the impacts of noise, light, visibility, or activity and vehicular traffic on residential uses and MSHCP conservation areas. CONSISTENCY The development pattern and grading themes of Terracina center around the existing knoll to the southwest and the 173 feet of natural topographic relief on the northeasterly portions of the site. In each area, the grading design produces view lots from these unique natural features. In Village 1, the knoll has been left in a predominantly natural state by the winding street design to its top thereby showing sensitive treatment of its hillside through preservation. In the eastern areas of the site terraced super -pads have been designed to maximize views to the north and west from the tops of slopes created by the varying super -pad elevations. Goal 4 Develop a viable downtown area that preserves potentially significant historical structures and provides civic and cultural opportunities as well as a destination for shopping, meeting, and gathering for both tourists and residents. Policies 4.1 Encourage the historic registration of potentially significant historic buildings as identified in Section 4.7 of the General Plan. 4.2 Encourage the preservation, innovative reconstruction, and reuse of historic buildings in and around the Historic District. 4.3 Consider locating additional civic, public, and cultural facilities, and encourage both residential and commercial mixed uses, in and around the Main Street Overlay area. 4.4 Encourage the revitalization of the Historic District through the revisions of the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Guidelines and implementation of the Downtown Master Plan. CONSISTENCY: This Terracina plan does not contribute directly to the development of a viable downtown area as referenced in this Goal and its Policies. Goal 5 Promote land use strategies that decrease reliance on automobile use, increase the use of alternative modes of transportation, maximize efficiency of urban services provision and reduce emissions of greenhouse gas emissions, as detailed in the Climate Action Plan. 11 - 11 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II. INTRODUCTION this would not be consistent with the City's General Plan for this particular site location. Due to the irregular and hilly natural terrain of its site, the Terracina land plan promotes innovative design in it's terraced, graded super -pads which are conveniently made into separate "villages" of residential product type. Recreational land uses within the Terracina land plan are strategically located within the project for the maximum enjoyment of all residents. The main recreational center and park is centrally located in Village 3. Large acreages of natural open space have been preserved in Village 1 of the Terracina plan. Goal 2 Establish and maintain the City as a year-round recreation destination. Policies 2.1 Encourage recreational uses including parks, beaches, marinas, motocross, soaring, skydiving, and a multipurpose trail within the City's rights of way. 2.2 Consider the feasibility and encourage if feasible the development of a new pier near the end of Main Street to connect the lake with the Downtown area. 2.3 Consider the feasibility of development of geothermal resources such as a spa or bathhouse establishment in the Downtown area. 2.4 Continue to evaluate the provision of public access to the lake and open space areas when making land use decisions. 2.5 Encourage a pedestrian circulation route around the lake to improve public access to this amenity. CONSISTENCY: The stated goal and policies do not apply to the Terracina project. Goal 3 Establish a development pattern that preserves aesthetics and enhances the environmental resources of the City. Policies 3.1 Upon availability of appropriate funding the City shall establish hillside grading standards that address unique natural features and encourage the sensitive treatment of hillsides in the site design and architecture of new construction. II - 10 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II. INTRODUCTION chapter of the General Plan, including those for the Alberhill District, are listed below with an accompanying discussion of consistency. Chapter 2.0 - Community Form 2.3.4 Land Use Goals and Policies Goal 1 Create a diverse and integrated balance of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, public and open space land uses. Policies 1.1 Promote innovative site design, and encourage the preservation of unique natural features, such as steep slopes, watercourses, canyons, ridgelines, rock formations, and open space with recreational opportunities. 1.2 Encourage development of unified or clustered community -level and neighborhood -level commercial centers and discourage development of strip commercial uses. 1.3 Encourage the development of sit-down restaurant establishments where appropriate and discourage the proliferation of drive-through fast food establishments. 1.4 Encourage development of a mix of industrial uses including light industrial, clean manufacturing, technology, research and development, medium industrial and extractive uses. 1.5 Encourage the development of large planned industrial and/or professional office parks on large parcels. 1.6 Encourage development of institutions including hospitals and educational campuses and facilities. 1.7 Encourage the use of paseos, green belts, linear parks, and trails within future developments. 1.8 Encourage a jobs/housing balance of one job for every 1.05 households by the year 2030. 1.9 Encourage rehabilitation and new construction to replace aging commercial facilities. CONSISTENCY: The Terracina land uses are balanced throughout the project with a variety of residential uses complemented by recreational, public and open spaces. Terracina does not propose commercial or industrial land uses as II - 9 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTINUED PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF LOW ROLLING HILLS, RANCHO LAGUNA, IN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOKS PAGE 377OFMAPS, SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDS, DESCRIBEDAS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 5 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASEAND MERIDL4N, AND THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARYOF RANCHO LAGUNA; THENCE NORTH 43 24' EAST, 1544.94 FEET,, THENCE SOUTH 46°36' EAST, 961.27 FEET,' THENCE SOUTH 43°24'WEST, 1666.56 FEET,• THENCE NORTH 4374' WEST 400 FEET,' THENCE SOUTH 43°24' WEST, 1069.00 FEET,; THENCE NORTH 46°36' WEST, 561.27 FEET,' THENCE NORTH 4374' EAST, 1110.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTHEASTERLY 1536.00 FEET. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE MOST SOUTHWESTERLY 500 FEET. PARCEL C. THE MOST SOUTHWESTERLY 600 FEET OF THAT PORTION OFLOW ROLLING HILLS, RANCHO LAGUNA, IN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SHOWN BYMAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8 PAGE 377 OF MAPS, SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATA POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERL YLINE OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 5 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASEAND MERIDAN, AND THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARYOF RANCHO LAGUNA; THENCE NORTH43°24' EAST, 1544.94 FEET- THENCE SOUTH46°36' E4ST 961.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 43°24'WEST, 1666.56 FEET, • THENCE NORTH 46°24' WEST, 400 FEET,- THENCE SOUTH 43 24' WEST, 1089.00FEET: THENCE NORTH 46°36' WEST, 561.27 FEET,' THENCE NORTH 43-24' EAST, 1210.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL D: THE SOUTHWESTERLY 766.00 FEET OF THE NORTHEASTERLY 1536.00 FEETOF THAT PORTION OF LOW ROLLING HILLS, RANCHO LAGUNA, IN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, COUNTY OFRIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOKS PAGE 377 OF MAPS, SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDS, DESCRIBED BYMETES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS.- THENCE OLLOWS:THENCE NORTH 43°24' EAST, 1544.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH46°36' EAST, 961.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 43 24' WEST, 1666.56 FEET; THENCENORTH46 24'WEST, 400 FEET, THENCE SOUTH43 24' WEST 1089.00 FEET,' THENCE NORTH 46°36' WEST, 561.27 FEET,' THENCE NORTH 43 24' EAST, 1210.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL E. THE NORTHEASTERLY 768.00 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF LOW ROLLING HILLS, RANCHO LAGUNA, IN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8 PAGE 377 OF MAPS, SAN DIEGO COUNTYRECORDS, DESCRIBED BYMETES AND SOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLYLINE OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 5 WEST, SAN SERNAROINO BASEAND MERIDIAN, AND THE NORTHWESTERLYBOUNDARYOF RANCHO LAGUNA, THENCE NORTH 43°24'E4ST, 1544.94 FEET,- THENCE SOUTH 46°36' EAST 961.27 FEET,• THENCE SOUTH43 24' WEST, 1666,56FEET, THENCE NORTH 46°24'WEST, 400 FEET• THENCE SOUTH 43°24' WEST, 1069.00FEET; THENCENORTH 46°36' WEST, 561.27 FEET,• THENCE NORTH 43 24'EAST 1210.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL F ALL OF BLOCK 14 OF HOFFS ADDITION TO TERRA COTTA CITY, AS SHOWN BYMAP ON FILE IN BOOK 12, PAGE 566 OFMAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL G.' ALL OFBLOCK 13 OFHOFFS ADDITION TO TERRA COTTA CITY, AS SHOWN BYMAP ON FILE IN BOOK 12, PAGE 568 OF MAPS, RECORDS OFSAN DIEGO SHEET 2 OF 2 EXHIBIT II - 5 ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS AND PROJECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ifl /[1�� DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING, INC. YI19 SPECTRUM POINT( DRIVE SV116 E09 LANE , OP6 1, CA 93630 19,91 60F5]l0 1 A. (9191 506 5111 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 378-040-004, 378-040-805, 378-040-006, 378-040-007, 378-040-012, 389-180-001, 369-180-002, 389190-0172. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcelk GOVERMENTLOT 1 AND ALL THOSE PORTIONS OF GOVERMENT LOT2, AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, AND THE PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, BOTH IN TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 5 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASEAND MERIDIAN, MORE PARICULARLYDESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35,• THENCE SOUTH 8923' EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 35, A DISTANCE OF 172.06 FEET TOA POINT THEREON FOR THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OFTHATCERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO HAROLD LEADER, AS PARCEL 1 BY DEED RECORDED FEBUARY7, 1964 AS INSTRUMENT N0. 16051; THENCE SOUTH 00°15' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 878.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 39'59' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 65.63 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OFA TANGENT CURVE TO THE SOUTHEAST, HAVINGA RADIUS OF 1,020.00 FEET,• THENCE SOUTHWESTERL YAL ONG SAID CURVE, TO THE LEFT, THROUGH CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°45'ANARC DISTANCE OF 173.57 FEET TO THE END THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 30°14' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 194.55 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OFA TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 450.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERL Y ALONG SAID CURVE, TO THE LEFT, THROUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13'37'ANARC DISTANCE OF 106.95 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARCEL CONVEYED TO LEADER, AS AFORESAID, FROM WHICH POINT THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 73 23' EAST. THE LAST FIVE COURSES AND DISTANCES FOLLOWALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL CONVEYED TO LEADER AS AFORESAID; THENCE NORTH 88°4204" EAST, ALONG THE EASTERL Y PROLONGA TION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE PARCEL CONVEYED TO LEADER AS AFORESAID, A DISTANCE OF 106,50 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OFILLINIOS STREET TO THE TOWN OF LUCERNE, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK I i PAGE 499 OF MAPS, SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE SOUTH 01 °0234'EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 655.02 FEET TOA POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF ROBS ROAD (50.00 FEET WIDE), DECLARED A PUBLIC ROAD BY ORDER OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, A COPY OF WHICH IS IN MINUTE BOOK 26 PAGE 5 O SAID COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, AND SHOWN BYMAP 9P, ON FILE IN THE RIVERSIDE COUNTYROAD DEPARTMENT, SAID POINT BEING ONA CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 590.00 FEET, FROM WHICH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 1603131' WEST, • THENCE SOUTHEASTERLYALONG SAID NORTH UNEAND ALONG SAID CURVE, TO THE RIGHT, THROUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05'42"59'ANARC DISTANCE OF 60.53 FEET TO THEEND THEREOF' THENCE SOUTH 67°4030' EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF ROBS ROAD, A DISTANCE OF 787.85 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OFSAID GOVERMENTLOT2; THENCE NORTH 28°28'E4ST, ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 690.43 FEET TOANANGLEPOINT IN SAID SOUTHEASTERLYLINE,• THENCE NORTH 43 20' EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLYLINEAND ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLYLINE OF SAID GOVERMENT LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 2,289.60 FEET TO THE MOST EASTERLYCORNER OF SAID GOVERMENT LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 8923' WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERMENT LOT 1 AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 35, A DISTANCE OF2,525 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: LOTS 13 THROUGH 18 AND LOTS 22 THROUGH 24 ALL IN BLOCK 8 OF THE TOWN OF LUCERENE, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 11 PAGE 499 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE ALLEYADJOINING SAID LOTS 15AND 16 ON THE WEST VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE,• ALSO TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF HARRISONAVENUE ADJOINING SAID LOT 24 ON THE NORTH AS VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PORTIONS AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 27, 1966 AS INSTRUMENT NOS. 149712 AND 149713 BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL C: LOTS 19, 20AND 21, BLOCK8 OF THE TOWN OF LUCERNE, AS SHOWN BYMAP ON FILE IN BOOK 11 PAGE 499 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PORTIONS AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE BT DEED RECORDED JUNE 27, 1986 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 149712 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. SHEET 1 OF 2 EXHIBIT II - 5 ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS AND PROJECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ip ���v DAVID JDFF6RS CONSULTING INC I ,9 SRFCM0tl P0WTF DRIVE, SUITE 609 AKE F'aRFST CA 92630 9) 86-T>tl 4Ad 1919) 5116 55P II. INTRODUCTION The project proposal consists of six (6) different planning areas, or villages, each having two separate points of ingress/egress with its own unique lot size. The architecture, although unique to each village, will complement the overall theme of the development whether it be Spanish Bungalow, Tuscan, California Ranch, Craftsman, Santa Barbara or some other style chosen by the builder and approved by the City. Exhibit II -5: "Assessors Parcel Numbers and Project Legal Description" is taken from a Preliminary Title Report prepared by First American Title Company dated February 12, 2012. D. Objectives, Scope and Purpose The objectives of this Specific Plan are simply to provide a guide for the future development of the project development plan and to accomplish the following: • Provide a specific development plan within the goals, policies and objectives of the City's General Plan. • Provide flexibility in zoning and regulatory measures to help implement the vision of the plan and to meet future market demands. • To act as a master plan for the development of the site. • Provide for a cohesive community through implementation of guidelines, standards, theming and quality design and construction. • Provide future builders with entitlements in land use and zoning. • Provide for inherent value in the future neighborhoods through creative design techniques to create such things as views of the surrounding hills and Lake Elsinore. • To reduce, where practical, such things as public improvements to minimize pavement in favor of landscaping and reduce grading to keep construction costs to a minimum. To attract strong buyers who have "disposal income" and who will enhance the economic base of the City. E. Consistency with City General Plan This section of the Terracina Specific Plan discusses the project's consistency with the City's General Plan. The Goals and Policies of each -7 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II INTRODUCTION CONSISTENCY The plan for Terracina proposes an on-site recreation area, open space acreage, parks and the provision for an on-site commercial child day care center in an effort to minimize off-site automobile use for these facilities. Because Terracina is located adjacent to existing residential uses, its functionality is merely an extension of the urban services already being used by the existing residences. (The City's Climate Action Plan is addressed in other sections of this Specific Plan.) 2.4.4 Circulation Goal and Policies Goal 6 Optimize the efficiency and safety of the transportation system within the City of Lake Elsinore. Policies 6.1 The interconnection and coordination of traffic signals shall be achieved through two processes, namely the requirements in the conditions of approval on development projects and/or through the implementation of Capital Improvement Program projects. 6.2 Enforce and comply with proper intersection "sight distance" requirements as described by the Engineering Division. 6.3 Maximize the use of shared driveways and on-site circulation to minimize conflicts at access points to the roadway network. 6.4 Maintain the system of bike lanes and multi use trails throughout the City. Encourage the implementation of the network of Class I, II, and III bike lanes on all development projects through construction of the facility as described in the Bike Lane Master Plan and/or the Trails Master Plan. 6.5 The City will monitor traffic and congestion on Grand Avenue and Corydon Street through the review of project -specific traffic studies, and apply mitigation measures to ensure that projected traffic does not exceed daily capacities as new development occurs in the area. 6.6 As appropriate, coordinate City improvements with the efforts of the County and adjacent cities that provide a circulation network which moves people and goods efficiently to and from the City. CONSISTENCY: Terracina proposes, through Conditions of Approval from the various City Departments, for the extension of Terra Cotta Road through the project -12 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN / \ www \VX I�1���." q;\ � XV %\� �1- �t\\�i. \ �y/.'. < ��� 2• I —�� !4°h'�2 )! �t �,i19e I li'�ir� i! / � ii � Ij ��Uy'i ,r -r !s ! 7! la�l• . 3s e 31 til' I 1 � i3 f It i! it L 1 ii tl b i e i ARNOLO AVENUE �il�l' - '�! I �• �� h t STEVENS STREET i I!e Iii I 47i, a y \� it e���rl BAILEYSTREET P LASH STREET 47 i j p RON ROAD 51 i ii L I y V�ES�pµE Ar 1 '' �._ i -•� IISI r N.T.S. +J 1} ����� S Jl� ��II i. - r �/iii __`,,..,ter: ��"� ��/,/ ��N � iA - � ✓ �. ��,- SAV rr\ �\ STREET M; �/� - - l(i�� l'� m ET Ra?�R o 50 EXHIBIT II - 3 �P9�! EXISTING TERRAIN g19 SP QTR ERSCONSUL nNc i09 19 SPEGipUM POINTE ii I0 S0 600 V =86 778. IA. 19 93630 I9E9 506 S]"/0 I �%_ 19491 500 SST/ �uemreim�s�M mw�uw.w+,wrm�wmnsrsso�: mw.ioxc EXHIBIT II - 2 REGIONAL LOCATION LEI' Jq'; DAVID IFFFFRS CON M I IN(, INC rFl: � 19 Pl CI RUM 101N oRmC 9 A A69 li IAK SOREST CA 92636 19,91 Jb6-6918 1=A% 19191106-+G21 II. INTRODUCTION Centex Homes took the next step in development of the site by creating final improvement plans for grading, tract/final map, sewer, water, storm drain and a water quality plan. However, these improvement plans were not finalized and no permits were issued. There has been no improvement to the site to date with the exception of a portion of a water line constructed by Elsinore Valley Water District in the central portion of the site. The land was subsequently purchased by Terracina Investors, LLC (Spectrum Communities) in May, 2012. This ownership purchased the site with the understanding that in order to make this a viable project, the costs to develop had to be reduced and the lot count had to be slightly increased while maintaining a quality development proposal. C. Project Location and Description The City of Lake Elsinore is made up of eleven (11) different neighborhoods or Planning Districts under the General Plan. The Terracina project is located within the Alberhill District in the northern area of the City. The project site is located southwesterly of the Interstate 15 Freeway on the northern side of existing Lakeshore Drive between Dryden Street and Terra Cotta Road. The northern portion of the site is bounded by Dolbeer Street and Holt Avenue. (Exhibit II -2 'Regional Location"). The 151 acre irregular-shaped site is characterized by a hill or knoll in the westerly portion and gently rolling terrain for the remainder of the site extending to the east. (Exhibit 11-3 "Existing Terrain"). Lakeshore Drive, Terra Cotta Road, Dryden Street, Stoddard Street, Swan Avenue, Dolbeer Street, Hoff Avenue, Grey Avenue and Pierce Street all currently provide frontage and access to and from the site either by existing street improvements and/or dedicated right-of-way. (Exhibit 11-4 "Existing Street Access") 11 - 3 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN II INTRODUCTION II, INTRODUCTION A. Authority This Specific Plan document is prepared in accordance with the authority granted to the City of Lake Elsinore by the California Government Code, Title 7, Division I, Chapter 3, Article 8, Sections 65450 through 65457. The Government Code authorizes cities to adopt specific plans either by resolution as policy or by ordinance as a regulation. Planning Commission and City Council public hearings are required. The Government Code also requires, at a minimum, all specific plans to include the following information: o The proposed distribution, location, and extent of the use of land within the area covered by the Plan. o The distribution, location, extent and intensity of major components of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other essential facilities to be located within the Plan area and needed to support the proposed land uses. o Standards and criteria by which development will proceed, as well as the standards for the conservation, development, and utilization of natural resources. o A program of implementation measures, including regulations, programs, public works projects, and financing measures necessary to carry out the Plan. o A statement of the relationship of the Specific Plan to the applicable General Plan. B. Project Background In the early 2000s Centex Homes, through an assemblage of parcels from various owners, created an irregular-shaped project site totaling 150.8 acres. The assemblage was surrounded on all sides with existing rights-of-way including Lakeshore Drive, Terra Cotta Road, Grey Avenue, Dolbeer Street, Hoff Avenue, Pierce Street, Arnold Avenue and Dryden Street. Once assembled, Centex Homes subdivided the property and had prepared, submitted to the City and received approval for Tentative Tract Map 32786 (Exhibit II -1 "Previously Approved Tentative Tract Map") on October 11, 2005. It- 1 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The two main maintenance entities for the various components of the project are the City and the project HOA. The individual lot owners will be responsible for their ownership while the City will maintain the public streets. The project park basins, some slopes and natural open space areas will be maintained by the project HOA. The Terracina project complies, where applicable, with the City's Climate Action Plan and the applicable project -level Climate Action Plan consistency outline. A Fuel Modification Plan was prepared for the project in an effort to identify areas of the site susceptible to wildland fires. The Fuel Modification Plan also proposed mitigation for those areas in an effort to protect the future homes. A Water Quality Management Plan was required for the project to address and mitigate storm flows from the site which may have been polluted by the development. The WQMP also proposes basins throughout the site to mitigate this polluted water. The Phasing Plan for the project follows the various villages. The order of the construction phasing will be determined by the future builder(s) of the Terracina project based on market conditions at the time. The Design Guidelines for the project, both architectural and landscaping, have been described to complement each other throughout the project with details proposed at the discretion of the ultimate builder but at the same time must follow the details and themes presented herein as appropriate. The Development Regulations (zoning) for the Terracina project closely follows, with minor exceptions, the City of Lake Elsinore Title 17. There will be one zone for the project ("R-1") with minimum lot sizes, setbacks and dimensions for each village. Implementation of the project will follow the City's current process for all components, (Le maps, permits, etc.,) stated herein. Amendments are broken down into "major' and "minor" amendments. Financing options, Special Assessment Districts, Mello -Roos CFD, and builder funding are discussed in an effort to show various mechanisms available to implement construction of the project. 1 - 3 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Table of Contents generally follows the City's "Submittal Requirements for Specific Plans" format and expands on that format where needed to provide additional necessary information to assist in presenting the most comprehensive document practical. Exhibits are provided in the document, wherever needed, to demonstrate an example of the design element being discussed or to show an application of a design or other measure. Exhibits are generally provided in the sections of the text where the discussion is being made. E. Summary The City's existing General Plan designations of LDR and LMDR will not be changed for Terracina. The maximum yield for the site of 824 homes is considerably more than the Terracina proposal of 468 homes. There are no criteria cells located within the Terracina ownership but cell #4157 abuts the northerly boundary. An existing biologically sensitive area of 3.8 acres will be preserved in its natural condition to meet requirements of U.S.A.C., E.C.D.W.Q.C.B.and C.D.F.W.S. All public facilities, services and utilities exist for the surrounding homes and will be extended to serve Terracina. Existing water lines through the middle of the site will be used where practical. The proposed densities of the Development Plan are in keeping with the City's existing designations of the General Plan while the proposed lot sizes are in keeping with the existing lot sizes in the surrounding neighborhoods. The Plan offers 6 neighborhoods with different lot sizes/dimensions for 6 different home products. Each village neighborhood has its own ingress and egress points separating it from the other villages. A 2.1 -acre park is located in the central portion of the site and will contain such amenities as: restrooms, BBQ facilities, picnic tables, volleyball, paddle tennis as well as other uses and will be maintained by the project HOA. The Circulation Plan has six (6) access points into the main portion of the project while also extending Terra Cotta Road off-site, northerly to existing Nichols Road. Hoff Avenue will also be extended from the northerly project boundary to Terra Cotta Road in an effort to maximize traffic circulation. The grading concept for the site respects the natural topography as much as can be attained while creating lots with views of Lake Elsinore to the south and the hills to the north. 1 - 2 TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN LIST OF EXHIBITS Exh. Page No. No. II -1 Previously Approved Tentative Tract Map ................................ II -2 II -2 Regional Location.............................................................. 11-4 II -3 Existing Terrain................................................................. II -5 II -4 Existing Street Access........................................................ 11-6 II -5 Assessors Parcel Numbers and Project Legal Description.......... 11-8 111-1 Existing General Plan/Land Use ............................................ 111-2 111-2 MSHCP Exhibit... ................................. .. .............. ... . 111-3 111-3 Existing Biologically Sensitive Area ....................................... III -4 III -4 Existing Sewer -Lakeshore Drive ........................................... 111-6 111-5 Existing Water Lines........................................................... 111-8 III -6 Existing Drainage Areas ...................................................... 111-9 111-7 Existing Storm Drain in Lakeshore Drive ................................. 111-10 IV -1 Proposed Land Uses and Villages .......................................... IV -2 IV -2 Park Exhibit....................................................................... IV -5 IV -3 Terra Cotta Road and Lakeshore Drive Cross Sections .............. IV -8 IV -4 Terra Cotta Road and Hoff Avenue Off-site Extensions .............. IV -10 IV -5 Dryden Street and Stoddard Street Cross Sections ................... IV -11 IV -6 Dolbeer Street, Hoff Avenue and Pierce Street Cross Sections.... IV -12 IV -7 Local Streets Cross Section ................................................. IV -13 IV -8 Main Entry Street Cross Section ........................................... IV -14 IV -9 Entry Street — Village 6 ........................................................ IV -16 IV -10 Existing Topography........................................................... IV -19 IV -11 Terraced Grading Concept with View -sheds ............................. IV -20 IV -12 Maintenance Plan............................................................... IV -21 IVA 3 Fuel Modification Plan ......................................................... IV -27 IVA4Phasing Plan..................................................................... IV -30 V-1 Architectural Style Santa Barbara .......................................... V-3 V-2 Architectural Style Santa Barbara .......................................... V-4 V-3 Architectural Style Tuscan... .......... ................................... V-5 V-4 Architectural Style Tuscan .................................................... V-6 V-5 Architectural Style California Ranch ....................................... V-7 V-6 Architectural Style California Ranch ....................................... V-8 V-7 Architectural Style Spanish Bungalow ..................................... V-9 V-8 Architectural Style Spanish Bungalow ..................................... V-10 V-9 Craftsman Architectural Style ................................................ V-11 V-10 Craftsman Architectural Style ............................................... V-12 V-11 Main Entry Statement........................................................... V-14 V-12 Land Use Breakdown.......................................................... V-16 TABLE OF CONTENTS — Continued Page No. V. Design Guidelines.............................................................. V-1 A. Architectural Guidelines ......................................... V-1 1. Purpose and Intent 2. Residential Design Criteria 3. Residential Theming 4. Residential Site Planning Criteria B. Landscape Guidelines ........................................... V-13 1. Purpose and Intent 2. Entry Statements 3. Parks, Recreation Center and Open Space 4. Slopes and Natural Open space 5. Lighting 6. Basins VI. Development Regulations.................................................... VI -1 A. Zoning... ............................................................. VI -1 B. Uses, Standards and Regulations ............................. VI -1 VII. Implementation... ......................... ...... ............................. VII -1 A. Administrative Review Process ................................ VII -1 B. Phasing and Scheduling ......................................... VII -1 C. Amendments to the Specific Plan .......................... VII -1 VIII. Financing Options............................................................... VIII -1 A. Special Assessment Districts ................................... VIII -1 B. Mello -Roos Community Facilities District .................... VIII -1 C. Builder Funding .................................................... VIII -2 1. Design Costs 2. Construction Costs 3. Potential Credits and/or Reimbursements IX. Appendix........................................................................... IX -1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Il. Introduction., .............. . . .. ........ .................. ... . - - 11-1 A. Authority .......................... .. .. .......... .. ......... H-1 B. Project Background ....................... 11-1 C. Project Location and Description .................. ... ....... 11-3 D. Objectives, Scope and Purpose ................... ... ....... 11-7 E. Consistency with City General Plan., ..................... .. 11-7 Existing Setting.... .............. .... ............... . ..... ... 111-1 A. On-site and Surrounding Land Uses ......................... B. Environmental Setting ............................ . ........ . C. Public Facilities, Services and Utilities ...................... 111-5 D. Issues, Constraints and Opportunities ...................... 111-7 IV. Development Plan ................ ...... ..... ........ . .. ........ .... Page A. No. I. Executive Summary ......... . ... .................. -_ ........ .... 1_1 A. Purpose and Intent ......................... .. . .. . .... 1-1 B. Project Plan ..................... .. .... ....... - - ... - - .. 1-1 C. Process and Documents Prepared ...... .... . 1-1 D. Specific Plan Organization .......... ... ... .. . . ..... .... 1-1 E. Summary ................ ...... . ... 1-2 Il. Introduction., .............. . . .. ........ .................. ... . - - 11-1 A. Authority .......................... .. .. .......... .. ......... H-1 B. Project Background ....................... 11-1 C. Project Location and Description .................. ... ....... 11-3 D. Objectives, Scope and Purpose ................... ... ....... 11-7 E. Consistency with City General Plan., ..................... .. 11-7 Existing Setting.... .............. .... ............... . ..... ... 111-1 A. On-site and Surrounding Land Uses ......................... B. Environmental Setting ............................ . ........ . C. Public Facilities, Services and Utilities ...................... 111-5 D. Issues, Constraints and Opportunities ...................... 111-7 IV. Development Plan ................ ...... ..... ........ . .. ........ .... - IV -1 A. Land Use Plan ............... .................... ..... ... ..... IV -1 1. General Discussion/Opportunities 2. Planning Areas/Villages B. Circulation Plan... ............ ... .... ....... ................ IV -7 C. Public Facilities, Services and Utilities ....................... IV -15 D. Grading Plan .... .... ................. . . ... .. .......... .... IV -17 E. Maintenance Plan ................................... . ........ . IV -18 F. Climate Action Plan .................... ............ _.. .. .. - IV -22 G. Fuel Modification Plan ............................................ IV -26 H. Water Quality Plan .................. ......... .. .. ...... .... IV -28 I. Phasing Plan .................... .... . ..... IV -29 DESIGN TEAM CONSULTANTS Civil Engineering Mayers and Associates Civil Engineering, Inc. 19 Spectrum Pointe Drive, Suite 609 Lake Forest, CA 92630 (949) 599-0870 Environmental Glenn Lukos Associates 29 Orchard Lake Forest, CA 92630 (949) 837-0404 Fuel Modification Firesafe Planning Solutions 302 N, EI Camino Real, Suite 202 San Clemente, CA 92672 (949)240-5911 Geotechnical Lawson Geotechnical Consultants 31915 Rancho California Road, #200343 Temecula, CA 92591 (951) 719-1340 Land Planning David Jeffers Consulting, Inc. 19 Spectrum Pointe Drive, Suite 609 Lake Forest, CA 92630 (949)586-5778 Traffic/Noise/Air Quality Kunzman Associates 1111 Town and Country Road, Suite 34 Orange, CA 92868 (714) 973-8383 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (to be supplied later) ORDINANCE NO. (to be supplied later) TERRACINA S P E C IF I C P L AN IN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA City Approvals: Finding of Consistency with WRCMSHCP • Adopted by City Council CEQA-Mitigated Negative Declaration Certified by City Council Specific Plan No. _ Adopted by City Council by Ordinance No. o First Reading o Second Reading Tentative Tract Map No. 36557 by Resolution No. by Resolution No. Adopted by City Council by Resolution No. TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN IN THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA Prepared For: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 S, Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (951)674-3124 SPECTRUM COMMUNITIES 3334 E. Coast Highway #605 Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 (714) 745-6546 Preparer: _ DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING, INC 19 Spectrum Pointe Drive Suite 609 Lake Forest, CA 92630 (949) 586-5778 DECEMBER. 2014 4 mu.h �iY"is iN �N� �` I�Iez �• �� IZ J SWW( or aF 00, •r�r CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36577 FOR FINANCING AND CONVEYANCE PURPOSES Annex into the City of Lake Elsinore Community Facilities District No 2015-2 (Maintenance Services 12. Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plc„ Residential Design Review, Special Use Permit or building permit (as applicable), the applicant shall consent to the formation of a Community Facilities District or annex into the Proposed Community Facilities District No. 2015-2 (Maintenance Services) to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of the public right-of-way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public right- of-way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison, including parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project. Applicant shall make a seven thousand five hundred dollar ($7,500) non-refundable deposit to cover the cost of the formation or annexation process as applicable. (951) 674 3124 OF DE3ilby@Lake Els re:erg-. The applicant may propose alternative financing mechanisms to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of the public right-of-way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the Citv and for street lights in the public right-of-way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison including parkways open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the prosect in lieu of creating/annexing into a district. Contact the Administrative Services Director at 951- 674-3124. (Amended by Staff prior to March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) Planning Commission Approved Page 3 of 3 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36577 FOR FINANCING AND CONVEYANCE PURPOSES Specific conditions of approval related to traffic circulation, grading, drainage, right of way dedications, mitigation fee, and other related engineering requirements and/or mitigations shall be required when the property is subdivided or at time of development. 8. Each parcel shall have access to public right-of-way. 9. Existing right-of-way dedications (easements) shall be labeled prior to tentative map approval. Confirmation of existing right of way dedications shall be obtained through a title search with a copy provided to the Engineering Division prior to final map approval. 10. The developer shall be responsible for acquiring right-of-ways in which the developer or the City has no legal title or interest. DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Annex into CFD 2015-1 (Safety) Law Enforcement Fire and Paramedic Services CFD 11. Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site neye!G,. ent Pian Residential Design Review, or Special Use Permit (as applicable), the applicant shall consent to the formation of a Community Facilities District or annex into the proposed Community Facilities District No. 2015-1 (Safety) the Law Enforcement, Fire and Paramedic Services Mello -Roos Community Facilities District to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City. Applicant shall make a seven thousand five hundred dollar ($7,500) non-refundable deposit to cover the cost of the formation or annexation process as applicable. G6RtaGt D d Billay, F RanGe Manager, City of Lake €Isinereo+�674 3124 GF D@ilby<D-Lake-Elsnore:orq The applicant may propose alternative financing mechanisms to fund the annual negative fiscal impacts of the proiect on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City in lieu of creating/annexing into a district. Contact the Administrative Services Director at 951-674-3124. (Amended by Staff prior to March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) Planning Commission Approved Page 2 of 3 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36577 FOR FINANCING AND CONVEYANCE PURPOSES PLANNING DIVISION 1. The proposed project (Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36577) is a request to subdivide 150.8 acres into six (6) lots for the purpose of Financing and Conveyance only. No grading permits, building permits or other development will be allowed with this approval. (Amended by Staff prior to March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 2. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees and Agents for any claim, action or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees or Agents to attach, set aside, void or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the proposed project attached hereto. 3. VeSt Rg Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply with all applicable requirements for the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 16 unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. (Amended by Staff prior to March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 4. In the event an association or other legally responsible entity fails to maintain applicable improvements in such a manner as to cause same of to constitute a public nuisance, said City may, upon proper notice and hearing, institute summary abatement procedures an impose a lien for the cost of such abatement. 5. All future development within the Vesting—Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 area shall conform to all standards set forth in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and General Plan. Current landowner shall disclose to all potential buyers the requirements to conform to all standards and provisions of the LEMC and General Plan. (Amended by Staff prior to March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) ENGINEERING DIVISION 6. The processing of this map shall conform to the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 7. This 6 parcel tentative map is for financing and conveyance purposes only. A subsequent tract map or parcel map shall be required to subdivide this property. Planning Commission Approved Page 1 of 3 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) *AMII-.Ikml Planning Commission Approved Page 39 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) Sight distance at the project accesses shall comply with standard California Department of Transportation/City of Lake Elsinore sight distance standards. The final grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans shall demonstrate that sight distance standards are met. Such plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Lake Elsinore prior to the issuance of any grading permits for the project. Il. Mitigation Measure TRA -6: The traffic improvements to be installed by the developer will be phased improvements as required by the build -out of the project to address traffic impacts. A traffic improvement plan which includes the timing of phased improvements shall be submitted to the City of Lake Elsinore for review and approval prior to issuance of any grading permits for the project. Where improvements are needed to mitigate for operational impacts, the improvements must be in place and operational before occupancy permits are issued. mm. Mitigation Measure TRA -7: The developer will comply with the traffic conditions of approval determined by the City of Lake Elsinore for the project, including but not limited to, the payment of Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees and Traffic Infrastructure Fees as listed and required in Mitigation Measure TRA -4 and appropriate conditions of approval. 165. The applicant shall fund the implementation of the Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program (MMRP) through every stage of development. The City shall appoint an environmental monitor who shall periodically inspect the project site, documents submitted by the applicant, permits issued, and any other pertinent material, in order to monitor and report compliance to the City until the completion of the project. END OF CONDITIONS Planning Commission Approved Page 38 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) kk. Mitigation Measure TRA -5: The developer shall construct on-site and off-site roadway improvements, including but not limited to, the following: a. Construct Terra Cotta Road at its full -width improvement as a Secondary Highway with a 90 -foot right-of-way from Lakeshore Drive north to the northern boundary of the project prior to building permit issuance. b. Construct the extension of Terra Cotta Road from the north project boundary to Nichols Road with a paved roadway section, as approved by the City Engineer, in conjunction with development. C. Construct the extension of Hoff Avenue from the west project boundary to Terra Cotta Road with a paved roadway section, as approved by the City Engineer, in conjunction with development. d. Pay fair share of construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Terra Cotta Road (NS) and Nichols Road (EW). e. Construct Lakeshore Drive adjacent to the project site at its ultimate half - section width including sidewalk and parkway improvements consistent with the adjacent improved sections of Lakeshore Drive and additional 14' width for a northbound right turn lane on Lakeshore at Terra Cotta Road in conjunction with development. f. Install a traffic signal at the off -set intersection of Lakeshore Drive and Terra Cotta Road. g. Construct Dryden Street adjacent to the project site at its ultimate half - section width including sidewalk and parkway improvements in conjunction with development. Dryden Street shall be restricted to right turn in/out and left turns in only at its intersection with Lakeshore Drive. h. Construct Stoddard Street adjacent to the project site at its ultimate half - section width including sidewalk and parkway improvements in conjunction with development. i. On-site traffic signing/striping shall be implemented in accordance with detailed street improvement plans for the project. Planning Commission Approved Page 37 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) 1. Air conditioning or mechanical ventilation 2. Double -paned glass 3. Solid core doors with weather stripping and seals Noise Level Reduction of 20-25 dBA Measures 1-3 above and: 4. Stucco or brick veneer exterior walls or wood siding with one-half inch thick fiberboard underlayer 5. Glass portions of windows/doors not to exceed 20 percent 6. Exterior vents facing noise source shall be baffled Noise Level Reduction of 25-30 dBA Measures 1-6 above and 7. Interior sheetrock of exterior wall attached to studs by resilient channels or double walls 8. Window assemblies, doors, wall construction materials, and insulation shall have a lab -tested STC rating of 30 or greater. gg. Mitigation Measure TRA -1: The developer shall require that the speed of earth- moving equipment will be 25 miles per hour of less, and shall post signs onsite to this effect. hh. Mitigation Measure TRA -2: The developer shall use reasonable trip reduction requirements during project construction including, for example, contracting with a local food truck company to provide lunch onsite. ii. Mitigation Measure TRA -3: Terra Cotta Road shall be graded and used as construction access prior to precise grading activities. Prior to building permits, Terra Cotta Road shall be paved (final lift to be placed at completion of building activity). Construction traffic shall use Terra Cotta via Nichols Road to minimize impacts to existing residents. jj. Mitigation Measure TRA -4: The developer shall participate in the phased construction of the off-site intersection improvements through payment of established City of Lake Elsinore fees, participation in the Western Riverside Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees program, payment of the project's fair share traffic contribution (see Tables 9 and 10 of Appendix E), assessment district and/or community facilities district financing, and construction of off-site facilities under appropriate fee credit agreements. Planning Commission Approved Page 36 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) 8:00 am and shall cease no later than 4:00 p.m. Construction activity shall not take place on Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. bb. Mitigation Measure NOI-5: During construction, the developer shall require that all contractors turn off all construction equipment and delivery vehicles when not in use and prohibit idling in excess of 3 minutes. Easily visible signs shall be posted at the project site informing contractors and operators of this requirement. cc. Mitigation Measure NOI-6: The developer shall limit haul truck deliveries to weekdays only and from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Haul routes shall avoid residential neighborhoods, following the haul routes determined by the City. dd. Mitigation Measure NOI-7: For the duration of construction activities, the construction manager shall serve as the contact person should noise levels become disruptive to local residents. Developer shall post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact regarding noise complaints. The construction manager, within seventy-two (72) hours of receipt of a noise complaint, shall either take corrective actions or, if immediate action is not feasible, provide a plan or corrective action to address the source of the noise complaint. ee. Mitigation Measure NOI-8: Mitigation is required in order to achieve exterior noise levels of 65 dBA Ldn at several proposed sensitive receptors adjacent to Lakeshore Drive and Terra Cotta Road. This mitigation shall be provided by constructing a five-foot barrier along the property lines of Lots 66-72 and a six-foot high barrier at the property lines of Lots 5-16, 431-441, and 459-468. A six-foot barrier will be constructed along the entire frontage with Terra Cotta Road. Barriers shall be constructed of any material weighing at least 4 pounds per square foot. Barriers shall descend all the way to the ground and contain no holes or openings. Barriers shall wrap around to protect the side yards of lots adjacent to intersections. Recommended barrier configurations are shown in Appendix D (Figures 12 and 13) of this Initial Study. ff. Mitigation Measure NOI-9: As it is usually not aesthetically desirable to construct barriers high enough to reduce interior noise levels at second story sensitive receptors, enhanced building construction methods and materials must be employed to attenuate the approximately 20-28 dB required to achieve acceptable interior noise levels of 45 dBA Ldn. These methods include: Noise Level Reduction of 15-20 dBA Planning Commission Approved Page 35 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) flow fixtures for all faucets, toilets and showers that are installed in the proposed project. V. Mitigation Measure GRE -5: The project applicant shall implement Measure E-1.1 from the Climate Action Plan, which requires that new developments plant a minimum one 15 gallon nondeciduous umbrella form tree per 30 linear feet of boundary length. This has been calculated to require the planting of a minimum of 470 trees on the project site. w. Mitigation Measure GRE -6: The project applicant shall implement Measure T-1.4 from the Climate Action Plan, which requires that new development implement and connect to the network of bikeways, trails and safety features identified in the General Plan, Bike Lane Master Plan, Trails Master Plan and Western Riverside County Non -Motorized Transportation Plan. X. Mitigation Measure NOI-1: During all project site excavation and grading on-site, construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturer standards. The contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site. y. Mitigation Measure NOI-2: The contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise/vibration sources and sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. Z. Mitigation Measure NOI-3: Temporary noise barriers that provide at least 10 dBA in attenuation must be installed when project construction occurs within 100 feet of existing residential structures. Any such barriers shall break the line of sight from noise generators to sensitive receptors. They shall also be constructed as close to the sensitive receptor as possible to achieve the greatest attenuation effect and have no gaps or openings. Such barriers shall be maintained throughout the construction period. aa. Mitigation Measure NOI-4: Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation and construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and shall cease no later than 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Only finish work and similar interior construction may be conducted on Saturdays and may commence no earlier than Planning Commission Approved Page 34 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) o. Mitigation Measure CUL -5: A paleontological grading observation schedule by a certified paleontologist shall be maintained when grading in bedrock sedimentary units to further evaluate the fossil resources of the site. p. Mitigation Measure CUL -6: During construction -related activities of the project, should paleontological materials be unearthed, the Lake Elsinore Planning Department shall be notified immediately. Construction affecting the area shall be halted and the City shall coordinate the appropriate efforts for handling and/or disposition of these materials. q. Mitigation Measure CUL -7: If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours. Subsequently, the Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the "most likely descendant." The most likely descendant may then make recommendations, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98. r. Mitigation Measure GRE -1: The project applicant shall implement Measure E-1.3 from the Climate Action Plan, which requires that all of the proposed structures exceed the 2008 Title 24 energy efficiency standards by a minimum of 15 percent. S. Mitigation Measure GRE -2: The project applicant shall implement Measure T-1.2 from the Climate Action Plan, which requires the installation of sidewalks along all new streets to link neighborhood activity centers, major destinations and transit facilities. t. Mitigation Measure GRE -3: The project applicant shall implement Measure E-4.1 from the Climate Action Plan, which requires that the Landscape Plan for the proposed project adhere to the City's Assembly Bill 1881 Landscape Ordinance. U. Mitigation Measure GRE -4: The project applicant shall implement Measure E-4.2 from the Climate Action Plan, which requires that new developments reduce indoor water consumption by 30 percent. This shall be achieved through the use of low - Planning Commission Approved Page 33 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. If the developer and the Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Community Development Director (CDD) for decision. The CDD shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the appropriate tribe. Mitigation Measure CUL -3: At least 30 days prior to seeking a grading permit, the project applicant shall contact the appropriate Native American Tribal Representative (Representative)" to notify the Representative of the initiation of the grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Lake Elsinore and the Representative to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the responsibilities and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites and human remains discovered on the site. The archaeological monitor and the appropriate Tribe will evaluate the significance of any archaeological resource discovered on the property. Tribal and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. (*It is anticipated that the Pechanga Tribe will be the "appropriate" Tribe due to prior and extensive coordination with the City in determining potentially significant impacts and appropriate mitigation measures and its demonstrated cultural affiliation with the project area.) m. Mitigation Measure CUL -3A: Prior to any grading at or near the vicinity of the known surface boundaries of CA-RIV-5782 and CA-RIV-5783, the developer shall meet and confer with the appropriate Tribe and the project archaeologist to develop an appropriate controlled grading plan. The purpose of the controlled grading at and around the site is to afford the opportunity to determine whether any subsurface resources are associated with the sites and, if so, to collect the resources for appropriate mitigation as outlined in the Treatment Agreement. All controlled grading shall be monitored in accordance to the provisions of the Agreement required in CUL -3. n. Mitigation Measure CUL -4: The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the appropriate tribe for proper treatment and disposition. Planning Commission Approved Page 32 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) subject to noise that would exceed residential noise standards, both during and post -construction. Invasives. Project landscaping shall use native, drought -tolerant and noninvasive plants. Specifically, the project shall avoid the use of invasive plant species listed in Volume I. Table 6-2 Barriers. Proposed land uses adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area shall incorporate barriers, where appropriate in individual project designs to minimize unauthorized public access, domestic animal predation, illegal trespass or dumping in the MSHCP Conservation Area. Such barriers may include native landscaping, rocks/boulders, fencing, walls, signage and/or other appropriate mechanisms. Grading/Land Development. No manufactured slopes associated with the project shall extend into the MSHCP Conservation Area. h. Mitigation Measure 13I0-5: The developer shall comply with the City's updated landscape requirements for the use of native, drought -tolerant and non-invasive plants, and shall not install invasive species listed at Volume I, Table 6-2 of the MSHCP. This measure applies during construction and installation of improvements. Mitigation Measure BIO -6: The developer shall provide language in the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the project which requires compliance with the City's updated landscape requirements for the use of native, drought -tolerant and non-invasive plants and provides that homeowners may not replace such plants with invasive species. Developer shall incorporate into the CC&Rs the requirement that the invasive species provided on Volume I, Table 6-2 of the MSHCP are prohibited. The CC&Rs shall incorporate the list of invasive species, Volume I, Table 6-2 of the MSHCP, for reference. Mitigation Measure CULA: All earth moving activities within the project area during construction shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist selected from the latest Riverside County Cultural Resources Consultant List. k. Mitigation Measure CUL -2: If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are discovered during grading, the developer, the project archaeologist, and the appropriate tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) Planning Commission Approved Page 31 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) Section 401 Water Quality Certification/Waste Discharge Requirement from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The Permittee shall offset impacts to riparian/riverine areas by purchasing credits at the Riverside -Corona Resource Conservation District in -lieu fee program, or another approved in -lieu fee program or mitigation bank within the Santa Ana River Watershed, to be approved by the appropriate regulatory agency(s). The project shall offset the loss of 1.13 acres of riparian habitat at a 3:1 ratio, for a total of 3.39 acres; and shall offset the loss of 0.42 acre of unvegetated riverine areas at a ratio of 3:1, for a total of 1.26 acres. Total compensatory mitigation shall be a minimum of 4.65 acres. g. Mitigation Measure 13I0-4: To avoid or reduce indirect impacts of the project on the MSHCP Conservation Area (Criteria Cell #4157) adjacent to or in close proximity of the project, the project shall include the following measures: Drainage. The project shall incorporate measures to ensure that the quantity and quality of runoff discharged to the MSHCP Conservation Area is not altered in an adverse way when compared with existing conditions. In particular, measures shall be put in place to avoid discharge of untreated surface runoff from developed and paved areas into the MSHCP Conservation Area. The project shall implement BMPs as identified in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Appendix B of this Initial Study). Toxics. Land uses proposed in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area that use chemicals or generate bioproducts such as manure that are potentially toxic or may adversely affect wildlife species, habitat or water quality shall incorporate measures to ensure that application of such chemicals does not result in discharge to the MSHCP Conservation Area. Lighting. Night lighting shall be directed away from the MSHCP Conservation Area to protect species within the MSHCP Conservation Area from direct night lighting, ensuring that ambient lighting in the MSHCP Conservation Area is not increased. Additionally, the project shall adhere to the City's lighting standards which would avoid shining light onto adjacent properties. Noise. Proposed noise generating land uses affecting the MSHCP Conservation Area shall incorporate setbacks, berms or walls to minimize the effects of noise on MSHCP Conservation Area resources pursuant to applicable rules, regulations and guidelines related to land use noise standards. The project shall include applicable structures to ensure that wildlife within the MSHCP Conservation Area will not be Planning Commission Approved Page 30 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) viii. The developer shall require and ensure that the contractor or builder shall suspend use of all construction equipment operations during first stage smog alerts. C. Mitigation Measure AIR -3: Electrical outlets shall be installed on the exterior walls of all residential buildings to promote the use electric landscape maintenance equipment. d. Mitigation Measure BIO -1: The project applicant shall ensure that a preconstruction presence/absence survey for burrowing owl shall be conducted where suitable habitat is present. The survey shall be conducted within 30 days prior to site disturbance. If burrowing owl are determined to be present, passive (i.e., use of one-way doors and collapse of burrows) relocation following accepted protocols will be utilized to ensure impacts to owls are minimized or avoided. Existing burrows shall be destroyed once they are vacated. In addition, disturbance of active nests will be avoided if burrowing owl is present during the nesting season (March 1st to August 31st). If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish buffers around the vegetation containing the active nest of at least 150 meters e. Mitigation Measure BIO -2: The removal of potential nesting vegetation will be conducted outside of the nesting season (February 1 to August 31) to the extent that this is feasible. If vegetation must be removed during the nesting season, a qualified biologist shall conduct a nesting bird survey of potentially suitable nesting vegetation prior to removal. Surveys will be conducted no more than three (3) days prior to scheduled removals. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish buffers around the vegetation containing the active nest of at least 500 feet of an active listed species or raptor nest, and 300 feet of other sensitive or protected nests. The vegetation containing the active nest will not be removed, and no grading will occur within the established buffer, until a qualified biologist has determined that the nest is no longer active (i.e., the juveniles are surviving independent from the nest). If clearing is not conducted within three days of a negative survey, the nesting survey must be repeated to confirm the absence of nesting birds. f. Mitigation Measure BIO -3: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall obtain the necessary authorizations from the regulatory agencies for proposed impacts to jurisdictional waters. Authorizations may include a Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, a Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and a Planning Commission Approved Page 29 of 39 City Council March 17. 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) b. Mitigation Measure AIR -2: The following measures shall be required during construction: i. The project applicant shall require that the site preparation and grading contractors implement the fugitive dust control actions provided in SCAQMD's Rule 403 for "Large Operations." If a more restrictive action is included below as project mitigation then that measure may be used in place of the applicable Rule 403 measure. A list of the Large Operations control actions from Rule 403 are provided in Appendix A of this Initial Study. ii. When materials are transported off-site, all material shall be covered. As necessary, it may be effectively wetted to limited dust emissions, and at least six inches of freeboard space from the top of the container shall be maintained to the extent feasible. If warranted by site or weather conditions, material shall be effectively wetted to limit dust emissions. iii. The developer shall require and ensure that the contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering, as necessary, to prevent transport of dust offsite. iv. The developer shall post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond to any dust complaints and attempt corrective action within 24 hours. V. The developer shall require and ensure that the contractor or builder shall formulate a high wind response plan for enhanced dust control if winds are forecast to exceed 25 mph in any upcoming 24-hour period. vi. The developer shall use its best efforts to require and ensure that the contractor or builder shall restrict truck operation to "clean" trucks, such as a 2007 or newer model year or 2010 compliant vehicles. vii. The developer shall use its best efforts to utilize CARIB certified equipment for construction activities. Developer shall inform all contractors and subcontractors that use of CARIB certified equipment for all construction activities is required where feasible and possible. Planning Commission Approved Page 28 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) to March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) Annex into the City of Lake Elsinore Community Facilities District No. 2015-2 (Maintenance Services 163. Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Deyel.,r. ent oia„ Residential Design Review, Special Use Permit or building permit (as applicable), the applicant shall consent to the formation of a Community Facilities District or annex into the proposed Community Facilities District No. 2015-2 (Maintenance Services) to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of the public right-of-way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public right-of- way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison, including parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project. Applicant shall make a seven thousand five hundred dollar ($7,500) non-refundable deposit to cover the cost of the formation or annexation process, as applicable. CE)RtaGt David Bilby, F RaRGe Manager, City of Lake ln� I\ Q74- 3124 or DBilby@ ake ElsiRere.eFg, The applicant may propose alternative financing mechanisms to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of the public right-of-way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public right-of-way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison including parkways open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project in lieu of creating/annexing into a district. Contact the Administrative Services Director at 951-674-3124. (Amended by Staff prior to March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. No. 2014-02 (SCH #2013091083) MITIGATION MEASURES 164. The applicant shall comply with the following mitigation measures, which are set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program (MMRP) for Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2014-02, which was adopted for this project. a. Mitigation Measure AIR -1: All diesel powered construction equipment in use shall require control equipment that meets, at a minimum Tier 3 emission requirements. In the event Tier 3 equipment is not available, diesel powered construction equipment in use shall require emissions control equipment with minimum of Tier 2 diesel standards. Planning Commission Approved Page 27 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) registered Civil Engineer and/or water purveyor prior to Fire Department review and approval. Mylars will be signed by the Fire Department after review and approval. Two (2) copies of the signed and approved water plans shall be returned to the Fire Department before release of a building permit. 159. Prior to Building Construction Verification - This project shall be inspected and approved by the Fire Marshal or designee prior to bringing combustible materials on site. During such inspection all permanent road signs shall be in place, all hydrants shall on operating and approved for use by the water purveyor, and all permanent road surfaces shall be completed including primary and secondary access circulation. Prior to Building Final Inspection 160. Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems for Single family and two-family 13D - Install a complete fire sprinkler system designed in accordance with California Residential Code, California Fire Code and adopted standards. A C-16 licensed contractor must submit plans, along with the current fee, to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation. 161. Designated Fire Lanes - The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/ or signs. DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Annex into CFD 2015-1 (Safety) Law Enforcement Fire and Paramedic Services CFD 162. Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, &4e DevetGp,ne t P!u, Residential Design Review, or Special Use Permit (as applicable), the applicant shall consent to the formation of a Community Facilities District or annex into the proposed Community Facilities District No. 2015-1 (Safety) the Law Enforcement, Fire and Paramedic Services Mello -Roos Community Facilities District to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City. Applicant shall make a seven thousand five hundred dollar ($7,500) non-refundable deposit to cover the cost of the formation or annexation process as applicable. CentaGt David B !by, FinaRGe Manager, G ty of Lake Elsinere at (951) 674 3124 a S$ilb�E-Isiaore e The applicant may propose alternative financing mechanisms to fund the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City in lieu of creating/annexing into a district Contact the Administrative Services Director at 951-674-3124 (Amended by Staff prior Planning Commission Approved Page 26 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) hydrant. Standard Fire hydrants shall be installed (6"x4"x2-1/2") 154. Hazardous Fire Area - The proposed project is located high or very high fire zone as adopted in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The project shall adhere to all high fire requirements as prescribed in the Title 24 Codes, any applicable state and local codes pertaining to high fire. The structures shall comply with Chapter 7A of the Building Code and or Section R327 of the California Residential Code. Roofing Materials shall be classified at not less than class "A". 155. Fuel Modification Plan - Fuel modification plans shall be provided to the Lake Elsinore Fire Protection Planning office. Plans shall include fuels modeling and comprehensive details with regard to the vegetation management plan. The fuels modification zone shall be not less than 100' from all structures and may be required to be increased. 156. Minimum Access Standards - The following access requirements are required to be implemented to ensure fire department and emergency vehicular access. All roadways shall conform to the City of Lake Elsinore approved roadway standards but in no case shall the minimum fire department vehicular access be less the following provisions: 1. Twenty-four feet (24') clear width. Where parking is to be provided, each parking side shall be provided with eight (8') additional feet on each side of the fire department access. 2. Median openings or crossovers between opposing lanes of a divided highway or street shall be located only at approved intersections at intervals of not less than 500 feet. [Ord. 529 § 3.2(F), 1973]. 3. The required all weather vehicular access shall be able to support no less than 70,000 lbs. over 2 axles. 4. Roadway gradient shall not exceed 15% on any access road, driveways, and perimeter roads. 5. Turning Radius shall be 26' inside and 38' outside for all access roads. 157. Secondary Access - In the interest of Public Safety, this project shall provide an Alternate or Secondary Access. Said access shall be constructed in accordance to the City of Lake Elsinore Engineering Department standards to accommodate full fire response and community evacuation. Prior to Building Permit Issuance 158. Water System Plans - Applicant and/or developer shall separately submit 2 sets of water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans must be signed by a Planning Commission Approved Page 25 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) 147. The developer, the developer's successor or assignee, shall be responsible for all maintenance of the 2.1 acre park (Let 470` and all open space lots until such time as those responsibilities are provided by the HOA. (Amended by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 148. Thete 2.1 public 5.1 acre park rPcreation center (Lot 47^) (as shown on attached Exhibit 1) shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Community Services Director prior to the issuance of the 1001" residential building permit. (Amended by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 149. Class II bicycle lanes for Lakeshore Drive and Terra Cotta Road shall be identified on the street improvements plans and constructed in concurrence with the completion of said street improvements. 150. Prior to issuance of h ldi peFm } the develGl9eF h it n h n } R I'eu fees at the Fates in effeGt at the o the a plinat en For VTTNA 36567 .Doom (Deleted by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING OFFICE General Conditions 151, Lake Elsinore Fire Protection Planning Office Responsibility - It is the responsibility of the recipient of these Fire Department conditions to forward them to all interested parties. The permit number (as it is noted above) is required on all correspondence. Questions should be directed to the Riverside County Fire Department, Lake Elsinore Fire Protection Planning Division at 130 S. Main St., Lake Elsinore, CA 92530. Phone: (951) 671-3124 Ext. 225. The following fire department conditions shall be implemented in accordance with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the adopted codes at the time of project building plan submittal, these conditions are in addition to the adopted code requirements. 152. Blue Dot Reflectors - Blue retro -reflective pavement markers shall be mounted on private streets, public streets and driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. Prior to installation, placement of markers must be approved by the Riverside County Fire Dept. 153. Minimum Hydrant Fire Flow - Minimum required fire flow shall be 1,000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. Average spacing between hydrants 500' and 250' maximum distance from any point on the street or road frontage to Planning Commission Approved Page 24 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) 139. The design of the proposed park site shall provide pedestrian circulation and shall be in compliance with American with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. (Added by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 140. Prior to submittal of construction plans the developer shall meet with the Director of Communities Services to determine the location and specifications of the park amenities to be provided The final conceptual design of the park will be approved bV the Director of Community Services. (Added by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 141. Construction plans and specifications for the park shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services prior to the approval of the final map. (Added by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 142. The developer shall post security and enter into a park improvement agreement to improve the public park prior to issuance of the first building permit (Added by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 143. Construction of the park shall commence pursuant to a pre -construction meeting with the developer, the developer's construction contractor and City representatives. Failure to comply with the City's review and inspection process may preclude acceptance of the park by the City. (Added by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 144. The developer, the developer's successor or assignee shall be responsible for all the maintenance of the public park including the 90 day maintenance period. After successful completion of the 90 day maintenance period following construction these responsibilities will be accepted by the City. (Added by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 145. The public park shall be improved and then conveyed to the City free and clear of any liens assessment fees or easements that would preclude the City from utilizing the property for public purposes A policy of title insurance and a soils assessment report shall be provided with the conveyance of the property. (Added by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 146. . The completion of the public park shall be in lieu of any Quimby and park Development Impact Fees (DIF) requirements for the development. (Amended by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) Planning Commission Approved Page 23 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) 135. All plan sets and recorded maps shall be digitized and provided on CD/DVD as follows: a. Final Map(s) - GIS Shape files' and .tif of recorded map. b. Improvement Plans — GIS Shape files" and .tif of approved as built mylar. C. Grading Plans - .tif of approved as built mylar. 'GIS Shape files must be in projected Coordinate System: NAD 83 State Plane California Zone VI U.S. Fleet. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 136.The 2.1 e rr r ate parkin ati Genter (Let 470) r all All open space lots shall be owned and maintained by the Homeowner's Association (HOA). (Amended by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 137. The 5.1 acre public park (as shown on attached Exhibit 1) shall be included in the Community Facilities District for maintenance and renovation costs (Added by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 138. The des gR of the -0 I -ark/FeGreatioR G8RteF (Lot 4 70) shall be PAIRS CAPRt &ha4-be-app final map. The public park (as shown on attached Exhibit 1) shall include An informal sports field Restroom approximately 300 sq. ft On-site parking 1 cover picnic area with 4 tables Barbecue hot ash container 4 waste containers Drinking fountain Half court basketball 8 benches One 2-5 year and one 5-12 year playground with shade over the entire play structure Perimeter walking trail with exercise stations Park monument sign Security Lighting Lockable pate to the parking lot (Amended by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) Planning Commission Approved Page 22 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) 128. The fair share cost of future improvements as a condition of this development shall be paid, as per tables 9 and 10 of AppeRGI X E of the October 2014 28.1.4 the January 29, 2014 Revised Terracina Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Kunzman Associates Inc. (Appendix E of Mitigated Negative Declaration No 2014-02) This condition implements Mitigation Measure TRA -4 of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2014-02. In lieu of Applicant's Fair Share contribution Applicant shall install improvements outlined in Condition #68. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 and March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearings.) 129. TUMF fees shall be paid. The T! Ener fees hMii h` +h` PffpGt've rate at the time „f payment n full n aGGeFdanee wth the L Enna The TUMF fees shall be based on fee at time the application for VTTM 36557 was deemed complete plus inflationary increases and such other reasonable increases in effect at time of payment as contemplated under LEMC Section 16.83.040 subpart C. (Amended by Staff prior to March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 130. All required public right-of-way dedications, easements, dedications and vacations and easement agreement(s) for ingress and egress through adjacent property(ies) shall be recorded with a recorded copy provided to the City prior to final project approval. 131. Prior to thp final inspeGtion and orGulpaney of the dwelling unit: The develope ■ The fee shall be equal to current Post est mate for improvements 1; ' - ` - -1; ' - g GontiRg8RGY) plu6 an additional 15% of the t9tal GGIRst-R-In-tioln. Gest estimate to ERgiReer. (Deleted by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 132. In the event of damage to City roads from hauling or other construction related activity, applicant shall pay full cost of restoring public roads to the baseline condition. 133. As -built plans for all in -field revisions to approved plan sets shall be submitted for review and approval by the City. The developer/developer/owner is responsible for revising the original mylar plans. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 134. All final studies and reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8'/z x 11" mylar) shall be submitted in .tif format on a CD/DVD. Studies and reports include, Soils, Seismic, Hydrology, Hydraulics, Grading, SWPPP, WQMP, etc. Planning Commission Approved Page 21 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) discretion may allow for the phased construction of the ultimate improvements (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 121. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit: Construct a 5 -foot wide sidewalk on the west side of Terra Cotta Road between Lakeshore Drive and Harrison Avenue (Added by Staff prior to the July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 122. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit: Construct the extension of Terra Cotta Road from the north project boundary to Nichols Road with a 32' paved roadway width with paved roadway section approved by the City Engineer. (Amended by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 123. e __ -f o --- wStFeet fFGM the PF9jeGt boundary tA N Pho1c; Read with a 32' paved readway width, RGl d ng an a' gr-adtad shoulder on the -sides Prior to the issuance of the 300thv building permit The developer shall pay fee in lieu of construction of future median improvements on Lakeshore Drive The fee shall be equal to current cost estimate for improvements (including contingency) plus an additional 15% of the total construction cost estimate to cover design and administrative costs The cost estimate shall be approved by the City Engineer. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) Prior to Occupancy 124. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 125. All traffic signing and striping shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer. 126. Prior to the final inspection and occupancy of the 50m dwelling unit: Install a full intersection traffic signal at all legs of the off -set intersection of Lakeshore Drive and Terra Cotta Road. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 127. Prior to the final inspection and occupancy of the 150th dwelling unit Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Lakeshore Drive and Dryden Street (Added by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) Planning Commission Approved Page 20 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) liquefaction and/or subsidence zones present on-site. A certified letter from a registered geologist or geotechnical engineer shall be submitted confirming the absence of this hazard. 111. The applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading and/or drainage acceptance if needed from the adjacent property owners prior to grading permit issuance. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 112. The developer shall apply for, obtain and submit to the City Engineering Division a letter from Southern California Edison (SCE) indicating that the construction activity will not interfere with existing SCE facilities (aka SCE NIL). 113. Developer shall execute and submit grading and erosion control agreement, post grading security and pay permit fees as a condition of grading permit issuance. 114. A preconstruction meeting with the City Public Works Inspector (Engineering Division) is required prior to commencement of ANY grading activity. 115. A traffic improvement plan which includes the timing of phased improvements shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of any grading permits for the project. Secondary access shall be provided for each phase. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit: 116. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to building permit. 117. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location, such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. 118. Pay all Capital Improvement Mitigation fees (LEMC 16.34), 119. The Final Tract Map shall be recorded. 120. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit: Construct Terra Cotta Road at its full width section as a Secondary Highway with a 90' Right of Way from Lakeshore Drive north to the northern boundary of the project. The City Engineer at his/her Planning Commission Approved Page 19 of 39 City Council March 17. 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) Final Tract or Parcel Map 100. The developer shall submit for plan check review and approval a final map. 101. Phasing plan, if any, shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of any permits. 102. Prior to City Council approval of the final Tract Map the developer shall, in accordance with Government Code, have constructed all improvements or have improvement plans submitted and approved, agreements executed and securities posted. 103. Street abandonment shall be processed and approved as part of the final map. 104. Make an offer of dedication for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or shown on the Tentative Map. All land so offered shall be granted to the City, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the city. 105. Applicant shall record C C & R's for funding, operation and maintenance of slopes and drainage facilities within the project. The C C & R's shall be approved by the Planning Director and City Engineer prior to recordation of final map. 106. The Final Tract Map or Parcel Map shall include the phasing boundaries consistent with the parcels of the Tentative Tract or Parcel Map. The phasing boundaries or parcels shall be processed as separate tract maps. 107. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to: the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 108. Submit grading plans with appropriate security, Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer for approval by the City Engineer. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or diversion of drainage. 109. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 110. A seismic study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults, Planning Commission Approved Page 18 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) committed to in the preliminary Project -Specific WQMP. The final WQMP shall be approved prior to issuance of any grading or building permit. 97. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan and Agreement that (1) describes the long- term operation and maintenance requirements for BMPs identified in the BMP Exhibit; (2) identifies the entity that will be responsible for long-term operation and maintenance of the referenced BMPs; and (3) describes the mechanism for funding the long-term operation and maintenance of the referenced BMPs. The City format shall be used. 98. All storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately marked "Only Rain in the Storm Drain" using the City authorized marker to prevent illegal dumping in the drain system. 99. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of use and/or occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with applicable NPDES permits for construction, industrial/commercial, MS4, etc. to include: 1. Demonstrate that all structural Best Management Practices (BMP's) described in the BMP Exhibit from the project's approved WQMP have been implemented, constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and specifications. 2. Demonstrate that the project has complied with all non-structural BMPs described in the project's WQMP. 3. Provide signed, notarized certification from the engineer of work that the structural BMP's identified in the project's WQMP are installed and operational. 4. Submit a copy of the fully executed, recorded Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan for all structural BMPs. 5. Demonstrate that copies of the project's approved WQMP (with recorded O&M Plan attached) are available for each of the initial occupants (commercial/industrial) or HOA as appropriate. 6. Agree to pay for a Special Investigation from the City of Lake Elsinore for a date twelve (12) months after the issuance of a Certificate of Use and/or Occupancy for the project to verify compliance with the approved WQMP and O&M Plan. A signed/sealed certification from the engineer of work dated 12 months after C of O will be considered in lieu of a Special Investigation by the City. 7. Provide a recorded copy of one of the following: a. CC&R's (they must include the approved WQMP and O&M Plan) for the project's Home Owners Association. b. A water quality implementation agreement has the approved WQMP and O&M Plan attached; or C. The final approved Water Quality Management Plan and Operations and Maintenance Plan. Planning Commission Approved Page 17 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) Erosion and Sediment Control Plan in compliance with the California Building Code and Local Ordinances. 92. Prior to grading or building permit the applicant shall demonstrate that compliance with the permit has been obtained by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the letter of notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) Number or other proof of filing to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 93. Erosion & Sediment Control - Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by the City Engineer, an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan as a separate sheet of the grading plan submittal to demonstrate compliance with the City's NPDES Program and state water quality regulations for grading and construction activities. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall identify how all construction materials, wastes, grading or demolition debris, and stockpiles of soil, aggregates, soil amendments, etc. shall be property covered, stored and secured to prevent transport into local drainages or waters by wind, rain, tracking, or dispersion. The plan shall also describe how the project will ensure that all BMPs will be maintained during construction of any future right of ways. A copy of the plan shall be incorporated into the SWPPP as applicable, kept updated as needed to address changing circumstances of the project site, be kept at the project site and available for review upon request. Post Construction 94. A preliminary WQMP shall be submitted during the project entitlement stage. The level of detail in a preliminary Project -Specific WQMP will depend upon the level of detail known about the overall project design at the time project approval is sought. At a minimum, the preliminary Project -Specific WQMP shall identify the type, size, location, and final ownership of Stormwater BMPs adequate to serve new roadways and any common areas, and to also manage runoff from an expected reasonable estimate of the square footage of future roofs, driveways, and other impervious surfaces on each individual lot. 95. The applicant shall use the Water Quality Management Plan for the Santa Ana Region of Riverside County guidance document and template for preparation of both the preliminary and final WQMP. 96. The project shall complete and submit for review and approval to the Engineering Division a final WQMP, incorporating the LID Principles and Stormwater BMPs Planning Commission Approved Page 16 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) Design, where feasible, to treat the pollutants of concern identified for the project, in the following manner (from highest to lowest priority) : (Section XII.E.2, XII.E.3,and XII.E.7) 82. Preventative measures (these are mostly non-structural measures, e.g., preservation of natural features to a level consistent with the MEP standard; minimization of Urban Runoff through clustering, reducing impervious areas, etc.) 83. The Project shall 'Infiltrate, harvest and use, evapotranspire and/or bio -treat the Design Capture Volume (DCV). 84. The Project shall consider a properly engineered and maintained bio -treatment system only if infiltration, harvesting and use and evapotranspiration cannot be feasibly implemented at the project site. 85. Any portion of [the DCV] that is not infiltrated, harvested and used, evapotranspired, and/or biotreated shall be treated and discharged in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section XII.G. 86. The project shall implement LID practices that treat the 85th percentile storm. 87. Project hardscape areas shall be designed and constructed to provide for drainage into adjacent landscape. 88. Hydromodification / Hydraulic Conditions of Concern — The project shall identify potential Hydraulic Conditions of Concern (HCOC) and implement measures to limit disturbance of natural water bodies and drainage systems; conserve natural areas; protect slopes, channels and minimize significant impacts from urban runoff. 89. CEQA — If CEQA identifies resources requiring Clean Water Act Section 401 Permitting, the applicant shall obtain certification through the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and provide a copy to the Engineering Division. Construction 90. Both a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post construction are required for this project. 91. SWPPP - A copy of the current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site, updated as necessary and be available for review upon request. Projects that are not subject to coverage under the General Permit — Construction will prepare and implement an Planning Commission Approved Page 15 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) 74. The developer shall be responsible for acquiring right-of-ways in which the developer or the City has no legal title or interest If the developer is unsuccessful in acquiring such right-of-ways the City could assist the developer in the Eminent Domain process at developer's cost. (Added by Staff prior to March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 75. Costs of General Plan circulation improvements and signalization may be at a minimum partially reimbursable through the City's Traffic Impact Fee Program. (TIF) 76. Some of the improvements shown on the Map and/or required by these conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the subdivider may have no title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title or interest. The subdivider shall pay all costs for acquisition of title or interest. 77. A Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare street and drainage improvement plans and specifications. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to City of Lake Elsinore Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC titles 12. and 16.). Street improvement plans shall show existing and future profiles at centerline of street; at top of curb and at centerline of the alley. The profiles and contours will extend to 50' beyond the property limits. 78. Interior streets shall be dedicated and improved as public residential street (40750' with a 3' PUE). 79. Traffic Signing and Striping plans shall be required with the street improvement plans. Signing and striping shall be installed in accordance with the plans approved by the City Traffic Engineer. Storm Water Management / Pollutant Prevention / NPDES Design 80. The project is responsible for complying with the Santa Ana Region NPDES Permits as warranted based on the nature of development and/or activity. These Permits include: a. General Permit -Construction b. MS4 81. The 2010 SAR MS4 Permit requires implementation of LID Principles and LID Site Planning Commission Approved Page 14 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 66. Construct the extension of Hoff Avenue from the west project boundary to Terra Cotta Road with a 32' half width, i-111ding side—alk and parkway impmvements en thp Perth side in GGRjURGtion with de:,elcr,r„e^+ with a paved half width section as approved by the City Engineer. (Amended by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 67. C;onStrUGt the extens on Of PieFGe Street from the project bE)uRdaFy te Nichols R9ad witI4 a 32' paved readway width, nGluding GIR 9' graded qhAWICIPF AR the north an( -,A ';G'Jth boUr des. (Deleted by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 68. Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Terra Cotta Road (NS) and Nichols Road (EW) including the following lane geometry: 1 NB left, 1 NB right, 1 EB through, 1 EB right, 1 WB left, 1 WB through, to include the storage length per the project traffic study, width and transitions per City Standards. Fair share mitigation in lieu of construction may be accepted with the amount approved by the City Engineer. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 and March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearings.) 69. Construct Lakeshore Drive adjacent to the project site at its ultimate half width section (60'), including sidewalk and parkway improvements consistent with the adjacent improved sections of Lakeshore Drive and additional 14' width for a NB right turn lane on Lakeshore at Terra Cotta Road in conjunction with development. 70. Install a full intersection traffic signal at all legs of the off -set intersection of Lakeshore Drive and Terra Cotta Road as designed by the Proiect's Traffic Engineer and reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 71. Construct Dryden Street adjacent to the project site at its ultimate half width section, including sidewalk and parkway improvements in conjunction with development. 72. Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Lakeshore Drive and Dryden Street. Qp,,J n Street at LakeshGre Avenue shall be FeStF Gted W riqht turn to DFYd8R and r clht tum tG Lakeshore The "'g- .S +hi in+er n by +ho Dreie Gt'c Tra#G C nineer shall _Ha reviewed d approved by the G +„ c eer (Amended by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 73. Construct Stoddard Street adjacent to the project site at its ultimate half width section, to include sidewalk and parkway improvements in conjunction with development. Planning Commission Approved Page 13 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. Drainage from the project site shall be released from the prosect site in a safe manner as approved by the City Engineer including but not limited to release to natural channels public facilities and/or drainage easements existing on adjacent properties or new letters of drainage acceptance (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 58. All natural (historic, pre -development) drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or, shall be collected and conveyed to a safe and appropriate discharge point by a method approved by the City Engineer. 59. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for any off-site grading, if needed, from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) Improvements 60. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to final map approval. 61. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work in City right-of-way. 62. Terra Cotta Road shall be graded and used as construction access prior to precise grading activity. Prior to building permits, Terra Cotta Road shall be paved, with final lift of asphalt to be placed at completion of building activity. 63. All existing accesses for ingress/egress to Terra Cotta Road from abutting properties must be maintained. 64. Construct Terra Cotta Road at its full width section as a Secondary Highway with a 90' Right of Way from Lakeshore Drive north to the northern boundary of the project. Construction of full improvement of Terra Cotta may be staged as approved by the City Engineer. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 65. Construct the extension of Terra Cotta Road from the north project boundary to Nichols Road with a 32' paved roadway width, including -an -&'-and a 4' graded shoulder on the north and south bound sides as approved by the City Engineer. (Amended by Staff Planning Commission Approved Page 12 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) manufactured slopes greater than 30 feet in height shall be contoured. 50. App! Gant shall preteGt all clOWRstream pFopeFties the dra nage patterns, i.8., GenApntratiAns AF diWRlF1;iAR Af fle'.Nf. . retepten shall be e in pIaGe fer any private dra nage faG I ties GGRGtFLlGtP-d OR S48 Ar Aff site. .. y grad ng GF drainage ORte PF Vate off is tie or adjaGeRt property shall require a wF tteR perm SS 9R tG -tURF from the AffeGted landE)WROF- (Deleted by Staff prior to January • 2015 Planning Commission 51. All drainage facilities in this tract shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. An Adequate and safe access road for maintenance to of detention/water quality basins shall be provided. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 52. All storm drain plans connecting to Riverside County Flood Control facilities will be approved by RCFC, and an encroachment permit from RCFCD will be required. 53. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 '/ x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 54. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots shall be provided per the LEMC. 0 nGludling Ver fiGation of tGnnage by Gert fied weigh rqaSteF tiGketS. (Deleted by Staff prior • January . 2015 Planning Commission 56. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, Planning Commission Approved Page 11 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 and March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearings.) 42. Street lighting and landscaping on public right-of-way shall be maintained by a maintenance assessment district LLMD 1. The project will annex into LLMD #1 prior to first building permit issuance. 43. All open space and slopes except for public parks and schools and flood control district facilities, outside the public right-of-way will be owned and maintained by either a home owner's association or private property owner. A^ aGeess Fead f mainteRaRGe shall Prevlded. Adequate access through the developed road system and / or open spaces shall be provided for maintenance and delineated on grading plans (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 44. Construction traffic shall use Terra Cotta Road via Nichols Road to minimize impacts to existing residents. 45. 10 year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria are exceeded, drainage facilities shall be provided. Grading 46. A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required. 47. Prior to commencement of grading operations, developer is to provide to the City with a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. All such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Haul route shall be submitted prior to issuance of a grading permit. Hauling in excess of 5,000 CY shall be approved by City Council. (LEMC 15.72.065) 48. All export material shall be discharged into a legal disposal site. No permittee shall process, including, but not limited to, crush, sift, or segregate, excavated earth materials on site for export and commercial sale without first obtaining a permit pursuant to Chapter 14.04 LEMC regarding surface mining and reclamation. (LEMC 15.72.065) 49. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. All Planning Commission Approved Page 10 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) the serving utility. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults; etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 40. The applicant shall install permanent bench marks to Riverside County Standards and at a location to be determined by City Engineer. 41. Applicant shall pay all applicable development fees; including but not all inclusive, T- ICAC TIC and area drainage foo: as follows: a. TUMF: Rate/Per Dwelling Unit. Due prior to GGGUpanGyj payable at rate in effect at t me of n. yme + Due prior to occupancy amount payable based on fee at time the application for VTTM 36557 was deemed complete plus inflationary increases and such other reasonable increases in effect at time of payment as contemplated under LEMC Section 16.83.040 subpart C. b. TIF: Rate/Per Dwelling Unit. Due priGr to GGGlJPanGy; payable at the Fate n ffnn+ of +-=F of nn„rv,ont Due prior to occupancy: amount payable based on fee at the time the application for VTTM 36557 was deemed complete plus inflationary increases in effect at time of payment as provided by Resolution No. 2002-22. C. Public Building Facilities Fee Rate/Per Dwelling Unit. Due prior to occupancy; amount payable based on fee at the time the application for VTTM 36557 was deemed complete plus inflationary increases in effect at time of payment as Provided by Resolution No. 2005-96. d Fire Facilities Fee Rate/Per Dwelling Unit. Due prior to occupancy amount payable based on fee at the time the application for VTTM 36557 was deemed complete plus inflationary increases in effect at time of payment as provided by Resolution No. 2006-69. e Library Facilities Fee Rate/Per Dwelling Unit. Due prior to occupancy amount Payable based on fee at the time the application for VTTM 36557 was deemed complete. f MSHCP Fee Due prior to occupancy amount payable based on fee at the time the application for VTTM 36557 was deemed complete plus inflationary increases in effect at time of payment as provided by LEMC Section 16.85.090. sg. Area Drainage: The project lies within West Lake Elsinore (approx acres 4-29 23) and Nichols SW (approx acres 128). Area Drainage due at grading permit; amount payable at the rat_ ... .,fr__+ c+ +:n,P of PayMen+ based on fee at time effect at time of payment as provided by LEMC Section 16 72 060. Current Rates: West Lake Elsinore — $5,955/gross acre; Nichols SW - $6,080/ gross acre. Planning Commission Approved Page 9 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) ii. Spray or rotor -type nozzles for areas a minimum of eight (8) feet wide, for slopes 3:1 and greater, AND with a minimum irrigation efficiency of 0.71. 4) Improvement of soil structure for better water retention; and 5) Application of mulch to Ilirlder evaporation. • The Final landscape plan shall be consistent with any approved site and/or plot plan. • The Final landscape plan shall include planting and irrigation details. • All exposed slopes in excess of three feet in height within the subject tract and within private lots shall have a permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, as approved by the Planning Division, prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. with Gh phase f t d I -I t shall bp I turf. Front and!andSGapiRq without the use of wass turf shall Ihp. .J asaR ailabl land6gapinq t' t the 't' • All landscaping and irrigation shall comply with the water -efficient landscaping requirements set forth in LEMC Chapter 19.08 (Water Efficient Landscape Requirements) as adopted and any amendments thereto (Amended by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 38. The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the project site identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity and a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division (951) 674-3124. The sign shall be installed prior to the issuance of a grading permit. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ ENGINEERING DIVISION General 39. All utilities except electrical over 35 KV shall be placed underground, as approved by Planning Commission Approved Page 8 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) • The applicant shall ensure a clear line of sight at ingress/egress points by providing plantings within 15 feet of ingress/egress points whose height does not exceed three feet and whose canopy does not fall below six feet. • The landscape plan shall provide for California native drought -tolerant ground cover, shrubs, and trees. Special attention shall be given to use of Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to prevent excessive watering. • No front -Yard grass turf landscaping will be installed. • All landscape improvements shall be bonded with a ten percent (10%) Faithful Performance Bond of the approved estimated labor and materials cost for all planting. The bond shall remain in effect for one year from Certificate of Occupancy. • All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within an affected portion of any phase at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested for any building. • All Model Homes shall be Xeriscaped and signage provided identifying Xeriscape landscaping. Xeriscape is a method of landscape design that minimizes water use by: 1) Implementing hydrozones; 2) Minimizes high water -use plant material as identified by Water Use Classifications of Landscape Species (WUCOLSJ (such as turf) and incorporates water -efficient ("drought -tolerant' / climate -appropriate) plants; 3) Requires an efficient irrigation system that includes: a. ET -Based ("Smart irrigation") controller(s) with weather -sensing, automatic shut-off and seasonal adjustment capabilities, b. Efficient irrigation water application through use of: i. Low-volume point -source irrigation (such as drip irrigation and bubblers) for all shrub planter areas (maximum of 3:1 slope) with a minimum irrigation efficiency of 0.90 ; and/or Planning Commission Approved Page 7 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) 32. A cash bond shall be required for any garage conversion of the model(s). Bonds will be released after removal of all temporary materials and the site is adequately restored, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 33. A cash bond shall be required for any construction trailers used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 34. The applicant shall pay school fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District prior to issuance of each building permit. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 35. The project shall connect to sewer and meet all requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). The applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to the EVMWD and shall incorporate all district conditions and standards. 36. All mechanical and electrical equipment associated with the residences shall be ground mounted. All outdoor ground or wall mounted utility equipment shall be consolidated in a central location and architecturally screened behind fence returns, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permit. 37. All front yards and side yards on corner lots shall be properly landscaped with automatic (manual or electric) irrigation systems to provide 100 percent plant coverage using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods. Construction Landscape & Irrigation drawings shall be prepared, reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and the Community Development Director or designee. A Cost Estimate for materials and labor shall also be submitted for review and approval. A Landscape Plan Check fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval based on the Consultant's fee, inspection, permit and administration fees. • The applicant shall replace any street trees harmed during construction, in conformance with the City's Street Tree List, at a maximum of 30 feet apart and at least 24 -inch box in size. • Perimeter walls shall be protected by shrubs and other plantings that discourage graffiti. Planning Commission Approved Page 6 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) City approval shall be recorded. Such documents include the Articles of Incorporation for the Association and Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs). a. At a minimum, all recreation and park areas, all natural slopes and open space, all graded slopes abutting public street rights-of-way which are not part of residential lots, up slopes from public rights-of-way within private lots and all private streets, and all drainage basins shall be maintained by the HOA. b. CC&Rs shall prohibit front -yard microwave satellite antennas. c. CC&Rs shall prohibit the use of water -intensive landscaping and require the use of low water use landscaping pursuant to the provisions of LEMC Chapter 19.08 (Water Efficient Landscape Requirements) as adopted and any amendments thereto. (Added by Staff prior to March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 27. Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance (LEMC Chapter 17.176) shall be satisfied during all site preparation and construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and shall cease no later than 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Only finish work and similar interior construction may be conducted on Saturdays and may commence no earlier than 8:00 am and shall cease no later than 4:00 p.m. Construction activity shall not take place on Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. 28. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 29. Prior to issuance of building permit, building plans for the Model Home Complex shall comply with all American Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements, including provision of a handicapped -accessible bathroom. 30. Construction phasing shall be implemented in accordance with the approved Phasing Plan which avoids construction traffic from entering occupied neighborhoods within the tract. 31. A cash bond shall be required for the Model Home Complex. This bond is to guarantee removal of the temporary fencing material, parking lot, etc. that have been placed onsite for the Model Home Complex. The bond will be released after removal of the materials and the site is adequately restored, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. Planning Commission Approved Page 5 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) 22. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall prepare a Final Wall and Fence Plan addressing the following: • Show that a masonry or decorative block wall will be constructed along the entire tract boundary. • Show materials, colors, and heights of rear, side and front walls/fences for proposed lots. • Show that front return walls shall be decorative masonry block walls. Front return wood fences shall not be permitted. • Show the location of all wood vinyl or steel (wrought iron or aluminum) pates placed within the front return walls • Show that side walls for corner lots shall be decorative masonry block walls. • Show that those materials provided along the front elevations (i.e. brick, stone, etc.) will wrap around the side elevation and be flush with the front return walls. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 23. All signage shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to installation. 24. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Building Division building plans that are designed to current UBC and adopted codes, and meet all applicable Building and Safety Division requirements. a. Driveways shall be constructed of concrete per Building and Safety Division standards. 25. The applicant shall prepare a list of proposed street names for review and approval by the Planning, Building, and Fire Departments of the City. 26. Prior to recordation of a Final Map, the applicant shall initiate and complete the formation of a Homeowner's Association (HOA) which shall be approved by the City, recorded, and in place. All Association documents shall be shall be submitted for review and approval by City Planning and Engineering and the City Attorney; and upon Planning Commission Approved Page 4 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) 15. All of the improvements shall be designed by the applicant's Civil Engineer to the specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore. 16. The applicant shall meet all requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) Prior to Design Review Approval 17. All future structural development associated with this map requires separate Design Review approval pursuant to the provisions of LEMC Chapter 17.184. 18. The following architectural details shall be provided: • All front fence returns will be decorative masonry walls. Wood fences will not be allowed along the front elevation. Wood vinyl or steel (wrought iron or aluminum) gates are allowed in order to allow access to rear yards. • The applicant shall provide four-sided articulation. Architectural enhancements and treatments shall be provided all residential elevations (front, rear and side) visible from streets and other public views. • All fireplaces shall be natural gas fireplaces only. No wood burning fireplaces shall be allowed. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 19. Design for all drainage basins proposed with Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557 shall be approved by the City Engineer and Community Development Director or designees. Security fencing shall also be shown. Chain-link fencing is prohibited. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits/Building Permits 20. The applicant shall obtain all necessary State and Federal permits, approvals, or other entitlements, where applicable, prior to each phase of development of the project. 21. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall submit a letter of verification (will - serve letter) to the City Engineer, for all required utility services. Planning Commission Approved Page 3 of 39 City Council March 17. 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) c) All street sections shall be revised to comply the requirements set forth in these conditions of approval. (Added by Staff prior to July 14 2015 City Council hearing.) 6. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557 will expire two years from date of approval unless within that period of time a Final Map has been filed with the County Recorder, or an extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 7. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557 shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and applicable requirements contained in the Terracina Specific Plan document and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 8. Future development shall comply with these Conditions of Approval and those provisions and requirements contained in the Terracina Specific Plan document. 9. The applicant shall provide all project -related on-site and off-site improvements as described in the Terracina Specific Plan document and these Conditions of Approval. 10. bas r. If dptprm adclqt Anal n mental analysis will be requ . (Deleted by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 11. The applicant shall pay all applicable City fees at the rate in effect at the time of payment. the application for VTTM 36557 was deemed complete plus inflationary increases in effect at time of payment (Amended by Staff prior to March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) Prior to Recordation of Final Tract Map(s) 12. All lots shall comply with minimum standards contained in the Terracina Specific Plan, 13. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots shall be provided per the LEMC. 14. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Designee. Planning Commission Approved Page 2 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 (TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN) GENERAL The proposed project (Vesting Tentative Tract No. 36557) proposes the subdivision of 150.8 acres into 466 452 single-family residential lots, one 5.1 acre gross (4.2 acre net) park site, seven landscape lots, four open space lots, one sewer lift station lot and three Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and drainage basin lots. The southern project boundary is located adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street. Hoff Avenue is located along the northern boundary. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the Vesting Tentative Tract No. 36557. Within 30 days of project approval, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $2,260.00 made payable to the County of Riverside for the filing of a Notice of Determination. The check shall be submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the project's approval. PLANNING DIVISION 5. A revised version of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557 shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director or designee within 30 days of approval by the City Council No permit shall be issued until the revised version of the vesting tentative tract map and any revisions required by these conditions of approval are administratively approved by the Community Development Director or designee In addition to any modifications required by these conditions of approval the revised version of the tentative map shall include the following revisions: a) Vesting Tentative Tract Map No 36557 shall be revised to show a 5.1 acre gross (4.2 acre net) park site (attached Exhibit 1) in place of the "Recreation Center/Park" site (1.6 acre net 2.1 acre gross) shown on the tentative map. b) All tables on the tentative map shall be revised to reflect the new configuration of lots, streets and parks that result from the change described in Paragraph a above. Planning Commission Approved Page 1 of 39 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 EXHIBIT 2 r 4rN-'➢bn HrhP ;—�: ww �. , s -P•,.,> S �v hy.YW C tt- nma Planning Commission Approved Page 34 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 EXHIBIT 1 Planning Commission Approved Page 33 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 II. Mitigation Measure TRA -6: The traffic improvements to be installed by the developer will be phased improvements as required by the build -out of the project to address traffic impacts. A traffic improvement plan which includes the timing of phased improvements shall be submitted to the City of Lake Elsinore for review and approval prior to issuance of any grading permits for the project. Where improvements are needed to mitigate for operational impacts, the improvements must be in place and operational before occupancy permits are issued. mm. Mitigation Measure TRA -7: The developer will comply with the traffic conditions of approval determined by the City of Lake Elsinore for the project, including but not limited to, the payment of Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees and Traffic Infrastructure Fees as listed and required in Mitigation Measure TRA -4 and appropriate conditions of approval. 138. The applicant shall fund the implementation of the Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program (MMRP) through every stage of development. The City shall appoint an environmental monitor who shall periodically inspect the project site, documents submitted by the applicant, permits issued, and any other pertinent material, in order to monitor and report compliance to the City until the completion of the project. END OF CONDITIONS Planning Commission Approved Page 32 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 b. Construct the extension of Terra Cotta Road from the north project boundary to Nichols Road with a paved roadway section, as approved by the City Engineer, in conjunction with development. C. Construct the extension of Hoff Avenue from the west project boundary to Terra Cotta Road with a paved roadway section, as approved by the City Engineer, in conjunction with development. d. Pay fair share of construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Terra Cotta Road (NS) and Nichols Road (EW). e. Construct Lakeshore Drive adjacent to the project site at its ultimate half - section width including sidewalk and parkway improvements consistent with the adjacent improved sections of Lakeshore Drive and additional 14' width for a northbound right turn lane on Lakeshore at Terra Cotta Road in conjunction with development. f. Install a traffic signal at the off -set intersection of Lakeshore Drive and Terra Cotta Road. g. Construct Dryden Street adjacent to the project site at its ultimate half - section width including sidewalk and parkway improvements in conjunction with development. Dryden Street shall be restricted to right turn in/out and left turns in only at its intersection with Lakeshore Drive. h. Construct Stoddard Street adjacent to the project site at its ultimate half - section width including sidewalk and parkway improvements in conjunction with development. On-site traffic signing/striping shall be implemented in accordance with detailed street improvement plans for the project. Sight distance at the project accesses shall comply with standard California Department of Transportation/City of Lake Elsinore sight distance standards. The final grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans shall demonstrate that sight distance standards are met. Such plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Lake Elsinore prior to the issuance of any grading permits for the project. Planning Commission Approved Page 31 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 Measures 1-3 above and: 4. Stucco or brick veneer exterior walls or wood siding with one-half inch thick fiberboard underlayer 5. Glass portions of windows/doors not to exceed 20 percent 6. Exterior vents facing noise source shall be baffled Noise Level Reduction of 25-30 dBA Measures 1-6 above and 7. Interior sheetrock of exterior wall attached to studs by resilient channels or double walls 8. Window assemblies, doors, wall construction materials, and insulation shall have a lab -tested STC rating of 30 or greater. gg. Mitigation Measure TRA -1: The developer shall require that the speed of earth- moving equipment will be 25 miles per hour of less, and shall post signs onsite to this effect. hh. Mitigation Measure TRA -2: The developer shall use reasonable trip reduction requirements during project construction including, for example, contracting with a local food truck company to provide lunch onsite. ii. Mitigation Measure TRA -3: Terra Cotta Road shall be graded and used as construction access prior to precise grading activities. Prior to building permits, Terra Cotta Road shall be paved (final lift to be placed at completion of building activity). Construction traffic shall use Terra Cotta via Nichols Road to minimize impacts to existing residents. jj. Mitigation Measure TRA -4: The developer shall participate in the phased construction of the off-site intersection improvements through payment of established City of Lake Elsinore fees, participation in the Western Riverside Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees program, payment of the project's fair share traffic contribution (see Tables 9 and 10 of Appendix E), assessment district and/or community facilities district financing, and construction of off-site facilities under appropriate fee credit agreements. kk. Mitigation Measure TRA -5: The developer shall construct on-site and off-site roadway improvements, including but not limited to, the following: a. Construct Terra Cotta Road at its full -width improvement as a Secondary Highway with a 90 -foot right-of-way from Lakeshore Drive north to the northern boundary of the project prior to building permit issuance. Planning Commission Approved Page 30 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 use and prohibit idling in excess of 3 minutes. Easily visible signs shall be posted at the project site informing contractors and operators of this requirement. cc. Mitigation Measure NOI-6: The developer shall limit haul truck deliveries to weekdays only and from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Haul routes shall avoid residential neighborhoods, following the haul routes determined by the City. dd. Mitigation Measure NOI-7: For the duration of construction activities, the construction manager shall serve as the contact person should noise levels become disruptive to local residents. Developer shall post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact regarding noise complaints. The construction manager, within seventy-two (72) hours of receipt of a noise complaint, shall either take corrective actions or, if immediate action is not feasible, provide a plan or corrective action to address the source of the noise complaint. ee. Mitigation Measure NOI-8: Mitigation is required in order to achieve exterior noise levels of 65 dBA Ldn at several proposed sensitive receptors adjacent to Lakeshore Drive and Terra Cotta Road. This mitigation shall be provided by constructing a five-foot barrier along the property lines of Lots 66-72 and a six-foot high barrier at the property lines of Lots 5-16, 431-441, and 459-468. A six-foot barrier will be constructed along the entire frontage with Terra Cotta Road. Barriers shall be constructed of any material weighing at least 4 pounds per square foot. Barriers shall descend all the way to the ground and contain no holes or openings. Barriers shall wrap around to protect the side yards of lots adjacent to intersections. Recommended barrier configurations are shown in Appendix D (Figures 12 and 13) of this Initial Study. ff. Mitigation Measure NOI-9: As it is usually not aesthetically desirable to construct barriers high enough to reduce interior noise levels at second story sensitive receptors, enhanced building construction methods and materials must be employed to attenuate the approximately 20-28 dB required to achieve acceptable interior noise levels of 45 dBA Ldn. These methods include: Noise Level Reduction of 15-20 dBA 1. Air conditioning or mechanical ventilation 2. Double -paned glass 3. Solid core doors with weather stripping and seals Noise Level Reduction of 20-25 dBA Planning Commission Approved Page 29 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 minimum one 15 gallon nondeciduous umbrella form tree per 30 linear feet of boundary length. This has been calculated to require the planting of a minimum of 470 trees on the project site. w. Mitigation Measure GRE -6: The project applicant shall implement Measure T-1.4 from the Climate Action Plan, which requires that new development implement and connect to the network of bikeways, trails and safety features identified in the General Plan, Bike Lane Master Plan, Trails Master Plan and Western Riverside County Non -Motorized Transportation Plan. X. Mitigation Measure NOIR During all project site excavation and grading on-site, construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturer standards. The contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site. y. Mitigation Measure NO[ -2: The contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise/vibration sources and sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. Z, Mitigation Measure NOI-3: Temporary noise barriers that provide at least 10 dBA in attenuation must be installed when project construction occurs within 100 feet of existing residential structures. Any such barriers shall break the line of sight from noise generators to sensitive receptors. They shall also be constructed as close to the sensitive receptor as possible to achieve the greatest attenuation effect and have no gaps or openings. Such barriers shall be maintained throughout the construction period. aa. Mitigation Measure NOI-4: Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation and construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and shall cease no later than 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Only finish work and similar interior construction may be conducted on Saturdays and may commence no earlier than 8:00 am and shall cease no later than 4:00 p.m. Construction activity shall not take place on Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. bb. Mitigation Measure NOI-5: During construction, the developer shall require that all contractors turn off all construction equipment and delivery vehicles when not in Planning Commission Approved Page 28 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 p. Mitigation Measure CUL -6: During construction -related activities of the project, should paleontological materials be unearthed, the Lake Elsinore Planning Department shall be notified immediately. Construction affecting the area shall be halted and the City shall coordinate the appropriate efforts for handling and/or disposition of these materials. q. Mitigation Measure CUL -7: If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours. Subsequently, the Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the "most likely descendant." The most likely descendant may then make recommendations, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98. r. Mitigation Measure GRE -1: The project applicant shall implement Measure E-1.3 from the Climate Action Plan, which requires that all of the proposed structures exceed the 2008 Title 24 energy efficiency standards by a minimum of 15 percent. S. Mitigation Measure GRE -2: The project applicant shall implement Measure T-1.2 from the Climate Action Plan, which requires the installation of sidewalks along all new streets to link neighborhood activity centers, major destinations and transit facilities. Mitigation Measure GRE -3: The project applicant shall implement Measure E-4.1 from the Climate Action Plan, which requires that the Landscape Plan for the proposed project adhere to the City's Assembly Bill 1881 Landscape Ordinance. U. Mitigation Measure GRE -4: The project applicant shall implement Measure E-4.2 from the Climate Action Plan, which requires that new developments reduce indoor water consumption by 30 percent. This shall be achieved through the use of low - flow fixtures for all faucets, toilets and showers that are installed in the proposed project. V. Mitigation Measure GRE -5: The project applicant shall implement Measure E-1.1 from the Climate Action Plan, which requires that new developments plant a Planning Commission Approved Page 27 of 34 City Council March 17. 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 Director (CDD) for decision. The CDD shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the appropriate tribe. Mitigation Measure CUL -3: At least 30 days prior to seeking a grading permit, the project applicant shall contact the appropriate Native American Tribal Representative (Representative)* to notify the Representative of the initiation of the grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Lake Elsinore and the Representative to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement, The Agreement shall address the responsibilities and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites and human remains discovered on the site. The archaeological monitor and the appropriate Tribe will evaluate the significance of any archaeological resource discovered on the property. Tribal and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. (*It is anticipated that the Pechanga Tribe will be the "appropriate" Tribe due to prior and extensive coordination with the City in determining potentially significant impacts and appropriate mitigation measures and its demonstrated cultural affiliation with the project area.) m. Mitigation Measure CUL -3A: Prior to any grading at or near the vicinity of the known surface boundaries of CA-RIV-5782 and CA-RIV-5783, the developer shall meet and confer with the appropriate Tribe and the project archaeologist to develop an appropriate controlled grading plan. The purpose of the controlled grading at and around the site is to afford the opportunity to determine whether any subsurface resources are associated with the sites and, if so, to collect the resources for appropriate mitigation as outlined in the Treatment Agreement. All controlled grading shall be monitored in accordance to the provisions of the Agreement required in CUL -3. n. Mitigation Measure CUL -4: The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the appropriate tribe for proper treatment and disposition. o. Mitigation Measure CUL -5: A paleontological grading observation schedule by a certified paleontologist shall be maintained when grading in bedrock sedimentary units to further evaluate the fossil resources of the site. Planning Commission Approved Page 26 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 Invasives. Project landscaping shall use native, drought -tolerant and noninvasive plants. Specifically, the project shall avoid the use of invasive plant species listed in Volume I. Table 6-2 Barriers. Proposed land uses adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area shall incorporate barriers, where appropriate in individual project designs to minimize unauthorized public access, domestic animal predation, illegal trespass or dumping in the MSHCP Conservation Area. Such barriers may include native landscaping, rocks/boulders, fencing, walls, signage and/or other appropriate mechanisms. Grading/Land Development. No manufactured slopes associated with the project shall extend into the MSHCP Conservation Area. h. Mitigation Measure 13I0-5: The developer shall comply with the City's updated landscape requirements for the use of native, drought -tolerant and non-invasive plants, and shall not install invasive species listed at Volume I, Table 6-2 of the MSHCP. This measure applies during construction and installation of improvements. i. Mitigation Measure 13I0-6: The developer shall provide language in the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the project which requires compliance with the City's updated landscape requirements for the use of native, drought -tolerant and non-invasive plants and provides that homeowners may not replace such plants with invasive species. Developer shall incorporate into the CC&Rs the requirement that the invasive species provided on Volume I, Table 6-2 of the MSHCP are prohibited. The CC&Rs shall incorporate the list of invasive species, Volume 1, Table 6-2 of the MSHCP, for reference. j. Mitigation Measure CUL -1: All earth moving activities within the project area during construction shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist selected from the latest Riverside County Cultural Resources Consultant List. k. Mitigation Measure CUL -2: If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are discovered during grading, the developer, the project archaeologist, and the appropriate tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. If the developer and the Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Community Development Planning Commission Approved Page 25 of 34 City Council March 17. 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 Regional Water Quality Control Board. The Permittee shall offset impacts to riparian/riverine areas by purchasing credits at the Riverside -Corona Resource Conservation District in -lieu fee program, or another approved in -lieu fee program or mitigation bank within the Santa Ana River Watershed, to be approved by the appropriate regulatory agency(s). The project shall offset the loss of 1.13 acres of riparian habitat at a 3:1 ratio, for a total of 3.39 acres, and shall offset the loss of 0.42 acre of unvegetated riverine areas at a ratio of 3:1, for a total of 1.26 acres. Total compensatory mitigation shall be a minimum of 4.65 acres. g. Mitigation Measure 13I0-4: To avoid or reduce indirect impacts of the project on the MSHCP Conservation Area (Criteria Cell #4157) adjacent to or in close proximity of the project, the project shall include the following measures: Drainage. The project shall incorporate measures to ensure that the quantity and quality of runoff discharged to the MSHCP Conservation Area is not altered in an adverse way when compared with existing conditions. In particular, measures shall be put in place to avoid discharge of untreated surface runoff from developed and paved areas into the MSHCP Conservation Area. The project shall implement BMPs as identified in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Appendix B of this Initial Study), Toxics. Land uses proposed in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area that use chemicals or generate bioproducts such as manure that are potentially toxic or may adversely affect wildlife species, habitat or water quality shall incorporate measures to ensure that application of such chemicals does not result in discharge to the MSHCP Conservation Area. Lighting. Night lighting shall be directed away from the MSHCP Conservation Area to protect species within the MSHCP Conservation Area from direct night lighting, ensuring that ambient lighting in the MSHCP Conservation Area is not increased. Additionally, the project shall adhere to the City's lighting standards which would avoid shining light onto adjacent properties. Noise. Proposed noise generating land uses affecting the MSHCP Conservation Area shall incorporate setbacks, berms or walls to minimize the effects of noise on MSHCP Conservation Area resources pursuant to applicable rules, regulations and guidelines related to land use noise standards. The project shall include applicable structures to ensure that wildlife within the MSHCP Conservation Area will not be subject to noise that would exceed residential noise standards, both during and post -construction. Planning Commission Approved Page 24 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 viii. The developer shall require and ensure that the contractor or builder shall suspend use of all construction equipment operations during first stage smog alerts. G. Mitigation Measure AIR -3: Electrical outlets shall be installed on the exterior walls of all residential buildings to promote the use electric landscape maintenance equipment. d. Mitigation Measure BIO -1: The project applicant shall ensure that a preconstruction presence/absence survey for burrowing owl shall be conducted where suitable habitat is present. The survey shall be conducted within 30 days prior to site disturbance. If burrowing owl are determined to be present, passive (i.e., use of one-way doors and collapse of burrows) relocation following accepted protocols will be utilized to ensure impacts to owls are minimized or avoided. Existing burrows shall be destroyed once they are vacated. In addition, disturbance of active nests will be avoided if burrowing owl is present during the nesting season (March 1st to August 31st). If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish buffers around the vegetation containing the active nest of at least 150 meters e. Mitigation Measure BIO -2: The removal of potential nesting vegetation will be conducted outside of the nesting season (February 1 to August 31) to the extent that this is feasible. If vegetation must be removed during the nesting season, a qualified biologist shall conduct a nesting bird survey of potentially suitable nesting vegetation prior to removal. Surveys will be conducted no more than three (3) days prior to scheduled removals. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish buffers around the vegetation containing the active nest of at least 500 feet of an active listed species or raptor nest, and 300 feet of other sensitive or protected nests. The vegetation containing the active nest will not be removed, and no grading will occur within the established buffer, until a qualified biologist has determined that the nest is no longer active (i.e., the juveniles are surviving independent from the nest). If clearing is not conducted within three days of a negative survey, the nesting survey must be repeated to confirm the absence of nesting birds. f. Mitigation Measure BIO -3: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall obtain the necessary authorizations from the regulatory agencies for proposed impacts to jurisdictional waters. Authorizations may include a Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, a Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and a Section 401 Water Quality Certification/Waste Discharge Requirement from the Planning Commission Approved Page 23 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 equipment in use shall require emissions control equipment with minimum of Tier 2 diesel standards. b. Mitigation Measure AIR -2: The following measures shall be required during construction: The project applicant shall require that the site preparation and grading contractors implement the fugitive dust control actions provided in SCAQMD's Rule 403 for "Large Operations." If a more restrictive action is included below as project mitigation then that measure may be used in place of the applicable Rule 403 measure. A list of the Large Operations control actions from Rule 403 are provided in Appendix A of this Initial Study. ii. When materials are transported off-site, all material shall be covered. As necessary, it may be effectively wetted to limited dust emissions, and at least six inches of freeboard space from the top of the container shall be maintained to the extent feasible. If warranted by site or weather conditions, material shall be effectively wetted to limit dust emissions. iii. The developer shall require and ensure that the contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering, as necessary, to prevent transport of dust offsite. iv. The developer shall post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond to any dust complaints and attempt corrective action within 24 hours. V. The developer shall require and ensure that the contractor or builder shall formulate a high wind response plan for enhanced dust control if winds are forecast to exceed 25 mph in any upcoming 24-hour period. vi. The developer shall use its best efforts to require and ensure that the contractor or builder shall restrict truck operation to "clean" trucks, such as a 2007 or newer model year or 2010 compliant vehicles. vii. The developer shall use its best efforts to utilize CARB certified equipment for construction activities. Developer shall inform all contractors and subcontractors that use of CARB certified equipment for all construction activities is required where feasible and possible. Planning Commission Approved Page 22 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 Annex into the City of Lake Elsinore Community Facilities District No. 2015-2 (Maintenance Services 135. Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Dian Residential Design Review, Special Use Permit or building permit (as applicable), the applicant shall consent to the formation of a Community Facilities District or annex into the proposed Community Facilities District No. 2015-2 (Maintenance Services) to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of the public right-of-way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public right- of-way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison, including parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project. Applicant shall make a seven thousand five hundred dollar ($7,500) non-refundable deposit to cover the cost of the formation or annexation process as applicable. (951) 674 3124 or DBilby@Lake . The applicant may propose alternative financing mechanisms to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of the public right-of-way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public right-of-way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison including parkways open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project in lieu of creating/annexing into a district. Contact the Administrative Services Director at 951- 674-3124. (Amended by Staff prior to March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. No. 2014-02 (SCH #2013091083) MITIGATION MEASURES 136. Prior to the approval of any implementing project within the Terracina Specific Plan (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, conditional use permit, design review, etc.), the following conditions shall be placed on the implementing project: 137. The applicant shall comply with the following mitigation measures, which are set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program (MMRP) for Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2014-02, which was adopted for this project: a. Mitigation Measure AIR -1: All diesel powered construction equipment in use shall require control equipment that meets, at a minimum Tier 3 emission requirements. In the event Tier 3 equipment is not available, diesel powered construction Planning Commission Approved Page 21 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 registered Civil Engineer and/or water purveyor prior to Fire Department review and approval. Mylars will be signed by the Fire Department after review and approval. Two (2) copies of the signed and approved water plans shall be returned to the Fire Department before release of a building permit. 131. Prior to Building Construction Verification - This project shall be inspected and approved by the Fire Marshal or designee prior to bringing combustible materials on site. During such inspection all permanent road signs shall be in place, all hydrants shall on operating and approved for use by the water purveyor, and all permanent road surfaces shall be completed including primary and secondary access circulation. Prior to Building Final Inspection 132. Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems for Single family and two-family 13D - Install a complete fire sprinkler system designed in accordance with California Residential Code, California Fire Code and adopted standards. A C-16 licensed contractor must submit plans, along with the current fee, to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation. 133. Designated Fire Lanes - The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/ or signs. DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Annex into CFD 2015-1 (Safety) Law Enforcement Fire and Paramedic Services CFD 134. Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development PIRR Residential Design Review, or Special Use Permit (as applicable), the applicant shall consent to the formation of a Community Facilities District or annex into the proposed Community Facilities District No. 2015-1 (Safety) the Law Enforcement, Fire and Paramedic Services Mello -Roos Community Facilities District to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City. Applicant shall make a seven thousand five hundred dollar ($7,500) non-refundable deposit to cover the cost of the formation or annexation process, as applicable. SentaGt Davd Bilby, FiRanGe Manager, City ef Lake Elsinore at (951) 674 3124 e 'r jaBi layiPLak�-sirtere_org- The applicant may propose alternative financing mechanisms to fund the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City in lieu of creating/annexing into a district Contact the Administrative Services Director at 951-674-3124 (Amended by Staff prior to March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) Planning Commission Approved Page 20 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 500' and 250' maximum distance from any point on the street or road frontage to hydrant. Standard Fire hydrants shall be installed (6"x4"x2-1/2"). 126. Hazardous Fire Area - The proposed project is located high or very high fire zone as adopted in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The project shall adhere to all high fire requirements as prescribed in the Title 24 Codes, any applicable state and local codes pertaining to high fire. The structures shall comply with Chapter 7A of the Building Code and or Section R327 of the California Residential Code. Roofing Materials shall be classified at not less than class "A". 127. Fuel Modification Plan - Fuel modification plans shall be provided to the Lake Elsinore Fire Protection Planning office. Plans shall include fuels modeling and comprehensive details with regard to the vegetation management plan. The fuels modification zone shall be not less than 100' from all structures and may be required to be increased. 128. Minimum Access Standards - The following access requirements are required to be implemented to ensure fire department and emergency vehicular access. All roadways shall conform to the City of Lake Elsinore approved roadway standards but in no case shall the minimum fire department vehicular access be less the following provisions: 1. Twenty-four feet (24') clear width. Where parking is to be provided, each parking side shall be provided with eight (8') additional feet on each side of the fire department access. 2. Median openings or crossovers between opposing lanes of a divided highway or street shall be located only at approved intersections at intervals of not less than 500 feet. [Ord. 529 § 3.2(F), 1973]. 3. The required all weather vehicular access shall be able to support no less than 70,000 lbs. over 2 axles. 4. Roadway gradient shall not exceed 15% on any access road, driveways, and perimeter roads. 5. Turning Radius shall be 26' inside and 38' outside for all access roads. 129. Secondary Access - In the interest of Public Safety, this project shall provide an Alternate or Secondary Access. Said access shall be constructed in accordance to the City of Lake Elsinore Engineering Department standards to accommodate full fire response and community evacuation. Prior to Building Permit Issuance 130. Water System Plans - Applicant and/or developer shall separately submit 2 sets of water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans must be signed by a Planning Commission Approved Page 19 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 maintenance of the 2.1 acre park site and all open space areas until such time as those responsibilities are provided by the HOA. (Amended by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 120. The private 2.1 public 5.1 acre park4pe eat on rentc, shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Community Services Director prior to the issuance of the 100th residential building permit. (Amended by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 121. Class II bicycle lanes, as specified in the Specific Plan, shall be identified on the street improvements plans and constructed in concurrence with the completion of said street improvements. 122. lan + in I' f + the rates R pgaet at the time the nl'na+'nn for \/TTNA 269.57 .vgsdee rl lets I the event that \/TTNA 4l`G� I+o rn l,+\ioly \/TTNA �FG�_ n lin„ foe and a ether oark development imigact fens (DIF) 1in effpAt t the time f payment. (Deleted by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING OFFICE General Conditions 123. Lake Elsinore Fire Protection Planning Office Responsibility - It is the responsibility of the recipient of these Fire Department conditions to forward them to all interested parties. The permit number (as it is noted above) is required on all correspondence. Questions should be directed to the Riverside County Fire Department, Lake Elsinore Fire Protection Planning Division at 130 S. Main St., Lake Elsinore, CA 92530. Phone: (951) 671-3124 Ext. 225. The following fire department conditions shall be implemented in accordance with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the adopted codes at the time of project building plan submittal, these conditions are in addition to the adopted code requirements. 124. Blue Dot Reflectors - Blue retro -reflective pavement markers shall be mounted on private streets, public streets and driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. Prior to installation, placement of markers must be approved by the Riverside County Fire Dept. 125. Minimum Hydrant Fire Flow - Minimum required fire flow shall be 1,000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. Average spacing between hydrants Planning Commission Approved Page 18 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 111. The design of the proposed park site shall provide pedestrian circulation and shall be in compliance with American with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. (Added by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 112. Prior to submittal of construction plans the developer shall meet with the Director of Communities Services to determine the location and specifications of the park amenities to be provided The final conceptual design of the park will be approved by the Director of Community Services. (Added by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 113. Construction plans and specifications for the park shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services prior to the approval of the final map. (Added by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 114. The developer shall post security and enter into a park improvement agreement to improve the public park prior to issuance of the first building permit (Added by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 115. Construction of the park shall commence pursuant to a pre -construction meeting with the developer, the developer's construction contractor and City representatives Failure to comply with the City's review and inspection process may preclude acceptance of the park by the City. (Added by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 116. The developer, the developer's successor or assignee shall be responsible for all the maintenance of the public park including the 90 day maintenance period After successful completion of the 90 day maintenance period following construction, these responsibilities will be accepted by the City. (Added by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 117. The public park shall be improved and then conveyed to the City free and clear of any liens assessment fees or easements that would preclude the City from utilizing the property for public purposes A policy of title insurance and a soils assessment report shall be provided with the conveyance of the property. (Added by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 118, . The completion of the public park shall be in lieu of any Quimby and park Development Impact Fees (DIF) requirements for the development. (Amended by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 119. The developer, the developer's successor or assignee, shall be responsible for all Planning Commission Approved Page 17 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 106. All plan sets and recorded maps shall be digitized and provided on CD/DVD as follows: a. Final Map(s) - GIS Shape files* and .tif of recorded map. b. Improvement Plans — GIS Shape files* and .tif of approved as built mylar. C. Grading Plans - .tif of approved as built mylar. "GIS Shape files must be in projected Coordinate System: NAD 83 State Plane California Zone VI U.S. Fleet. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 107. If any of the following conditions of approval differ from the Specific Plan text or exhibits, the conditions enumerated herein shall take precedence. 108. All open space shall be owned and maintained by the Homeowner's Association (HOA). (Amended by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 109. The 5.1 acre public park (Let 470 as shown on attached Exhibit 1) shall be included in the Community Facilities District for maintenance and renovation costs. (Added by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 110. Th approval of the final map. The public park shall include An informal sports field Restroom approximately 300 sq. ft On-site parking 1 cover picnic area with 4 tables Barbegue hot ash container 4 waste containers Drinking fountain Half court basketball 8 benches One 2-5 year and one 5-12 year playground with shade over the entire plav structure Perimeter walking trail with exercise stations Park monument sign Security Lighting Lockable pate to the parking lot (Amended by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.). Planning Commission Approved Page 16 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 98. Prior to the final inspection and occupancy of the 150th dwelling unit: Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Lakeshore Drive and Dryden Street. (Added by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 99. The fair share cost of future improvements as a condition of this development shall be paid, as per tables 9 and 10 of Append;x E of the QGtober 2014 2014 the January 29, 2014 Revised Terracina Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. (Appendix E of Mitigated Negative Declaration No 2014-02) This condition implements Mitigation Measure TRA -4 of Mitigated Negative Declaration No 2014-02 In lieu of Applicant's Fair Share contribution Applicant shall install improvements outlined in Condition #39. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 and March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 100. TUMF fees shall be paid. The TUMF fees shall be the effective rate at the time of payment in full in accordance with the LEMC. 101. All required public right-of-way dedications, easements, dedications and vacations and easement agreement(s) for ingress and egress through adjacent property(ies)shall be recorded with a recorded copy provided to the City prior to final project approval. 102. Prior to the finall inspe6tion and GOGUpanGy of the dwelling unit; -- - shall pay fee in 1 eU Of GenstruGtiep. of fi it, rp mpd an improvements on - , The fee shall be equal to c---.rrpnt cost Pstmate fer improverneRts design and admnstratVe GGsts. The Apst estimate shall be approved by the City E-ng_�R�. (Deleted by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 103. In the event of damage to City roads from hauling or other construction related activity, applicant shall pay full cost of restoring public roads to the baseline condition. 104. As -built plans for all in -field revisions to approved plan sets shall be submitted for review and approval by the City. The developer/developer/owner is responsible for revising the original mylar plans. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 105. All final studies and reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 '/2 x 11" mylar) shall be submitted in .tif format on a CD/DVD. Studies and reports include, Soils, Seismic, Hydrology, Hydraulics, Grading, SWPPP, WQMP, etc. Planning Commission Approved Page 15 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 90. The Final Tract Map shall be recorded. 91. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit: Construct Terra Cotta Road at its full width section as a Secondary Highway with a 90' Right of Way from Lakeshore Drive north to the northern boundary of the project. The City Engineer at his/her discretion may allow for the phased construction of the ultimate improvements (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 92. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit Construct a 5 -foot wide sidewalk on the west side of Terra Cotta Road between Lakeshore Drive and Harrison Avenue (Added by Staff prior to the July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 93. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit: Construct the extension of Terra Cotta Road from the north project boundary to Nichols Road with a 32' paved roadway width with paved roadway section approved by the Citv Engineer. (Amended by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 94. Street from the projeGt bouRdary to NiGhAls Road with a 32' paved rGadway width, including aR Q' graded " ld on thePrior to the issuance of the 300th building permit The developer shall pay fee in lieu of construction of future median improvements on Lakeshore Drive The fee shall be equal to current cost estimate for improvements (including contingency) plus an additional 15% of the total construction cost estimate to cover design and administrative costs The cost estimate shall be approved by the City Engineer. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) Prior to Occupancy 95. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on S 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 96. All traffic signing and striping shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer. 97. Prior to the final inspection and occupancy of the 50th dwelling unit: Install a full intersection traffic signal at all legs of the off -set intersection of Lakeshore Drive and Terra Cotta Road. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) Planning Commission Approved Page 14 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or diversion of drainage. 80. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 81. A seismic study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults, liquefaction and/or subsidence zones present on-site. A certified letter from a registered geologist or geotechnical engineer shall be submitted confirming the absence of this hazard. 82. The applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading and/or drainage acceptance if needed, from the adjacent property owners prior to grading permit issuance. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 83. The developer shall apply for, obtain and submit to the City Engineering Division a letter from Southern California Edison (SCE) indicating that the construction activity will not interfere with existing SCE facilities (aka SCE NIL). 84. Developer shall execute and submit grading and erosion control agreement, post grading security and pay permit fees as a condition of grading permit issuance. 85. A preconstruction meeting with the City Public Works Inspector (Engineering Division) is required prior to commencement of ANY grading activity. 86. A traffic improvement plan which includes the timing of phased improvements shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of any grading permits for the project. Secondary access shall be provided for each phase. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit: 87. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to building permit. 88. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location, such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. 89. Pay all Capital Improvement Mitigation fees (LEMC 16.34). Planning Commission Approved Page 13 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 7. Provide a recorded copy of one of the following: a. CC&R's (they must include the approved WQMP and O&M Plan) for the project's Home Owners Association. b. A water quality implementation agreement has the approved WQMP and O&M Plan attached; or c. The final approved Water Quality Management Plan and Operations and Maintenance Plan, Final Tract or Parcel Map 71. The developer shall submit for plan check review and approval a final map. 72. Phasing plan, if any, shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of any permits. 73. Prior to City Council approval of the final Tract Map the developer shall, in accordance with Government Code, have constructed all improvements or have improvement plans submitted and approved, agreements executed and securities posted. 74. Street abandonment shall be processed and approved as part of the final map. 75. Make an offer of dedication for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or shown on the Tentative Map. All land so offered shall be granted to the City, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the city. 76. Applicant shall record C C & R's for funding, operation and maintenance of slopes and drainage facilities within the project. The C C & R's shall be approved by the Planning Director and City Engineer prior to recordation of final map. 77. The Final Tract Map or Parcel Map shall include the phasing boundaries consistent with the parcels of the Tentative Tract or Parcel Map. The phasing boundaries or parcels shall be processed as separate tract maps. 78. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to: the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 79. Submit grading plans with appropriate security, Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer for approval by the City Engineer. Developer Planning Commission Approved Page 12 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 square footage of future roofs, driveways, and other impervious surfaces on each individual lot. 66. The applicant shall use the Water Quality Management Plan for the Santa Ana Region of Riverside County guidance document and template for preparation of both the preliminary and final WQMP. 67. The project shall complete and submit for review and approval to the Engineering Division a final WQMP, incorporating the LID Principles and Stormwater BMPs committed to in the preliminary Project -Specific WQMP. The final WQMP shall be approved prior to issuance of any grading or building permit. 68. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan and Agreement that (1) describes the long- term operation and maintenance requirements for BMPs identified in the BMP Exhibit, (2) identifies the entity that will be responsible for long-term operation and maintenance of the referenced BMPs; and (3) describes the mechanism for funding the long-term operation and maintenance of the referenced BMPs. The City format shall be used. 69. All storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately marked "Only Rain in the Storm Drain" using the City authorized marker to prevent illegal dumping in the drain system. 70. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of use and/or occupancy, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with applicable NPDES permits for construction, industrial/commercial, MS4, etc. to include: 1. Demonstrate that all structural Best Management Practices (BMP's) described in the BMP Exhibit from the project's approved WQMP have been implemented, constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and specifications. 2. Demonstrate that the project has complied with all non-structural BMPs described in the project's WQMP. 3. Provide signed, notarized certification from the engineer of work that the structural BMP's identified in the project's WQMP are installed and operational. 4. Submit a copy of the fully executed, recorded Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan for all structural BMPs. 5. Demonstrate that copies of the project's approved WQMP (with recorded O&M Plan attached) are available for each of the initial occupants (commercial/industrial) or HOA as appropriate. 6. Agree to pay for a Special Investigation from the City of Lake Elsinore for a date twelve (12) months after the issuance of a Certificate of Use and/or Occupancy for the project to verify compliance with the approved WQMP and O&M Plan. A signed/sealed certification from the engineer of work dated 12 months after C of O will be considered in lieu of a Special Investigation by the City. Planning Commission Approved Page 11 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 Control Board and provide a copy to the Engineering Division. Construction 61. Both a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post construction are required for this project. 62. SWPPP - A copy of the current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site, updated as necessary and be available for review upon request. Projects that are not subject to coverage under the General Permit — Construction will prepare and implement an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan in compliance with the California Building Code and Local Ordinances. 63. Prior to grading or building permit the applicant shall demonstrate that compliance with the permit has been obtained by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the letter of notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) Number or other proof of filing to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 64. Erosion & Sediment Control - Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by the City Engineer, an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan as a separate sheet of the grading plan submittal to demonstrate compliance with the City's NPDES Program and state water quality regulations for grading and construction activities. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall identify how all construction materials, wastes, grading or demolition debris, and stockpiles of soil, aggregates, soil amendments, etc, shall be property covered, stored and secured to prevent transport into local drainages or waters by wind, rain, tracking, or dispersion. The plan shall also describe how the project will ensure that all BMPs will be maintained during construction of any future right of ways. A copy of the plan shall be incorporated into the SWPPP as applicable, kept updated as needed to address changing circumstances of the project site, be kept at the project site and available for review upon request. Post Construction 65. A preliminary WQMP shall be submitted during the project entitlement stage. The level of detail in a preliminary Project -Specific WQMP will depend upon the level of detail known about the overall project design at the time project approval is sought. At a minimum, the preliminary Project -Specific WQMP shall identify the type, size, location, and final ownership of Stormwater BMPs adequate to serve new roadways and any common areas, and to also manage runoff from an expected reasonable estimate of the Planning Commission Approved Page 10 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 Storm Water Management / Pollutant Prevention / NPDES Design 51. The project is responsible for complying with the Santa Ana Region NPDES Permits as warranted based on the nature of development and/or activity. These Permits include: a. General Permit -Construction b. MS4 52. The 2010 SAR MS4 Permit requires implementation of LID Principles and LID Site Design, where feasible, to treat the pollutants of concern identified for the project, in the following manner (from highest to lowest priority) : (Section XII.E.2, XII.E.3,and XII.E.7) 53. Preventative measures (these are mostly non-structural measures, e.g., preservation of natural features to a level consistent with the MEP standard; minimization of Urban Runoff through clustering, reducing impervious areas, etc.) 54. The Project shall 'Infiltrate, harvest and use, evapotranspire and/or bio -treat the Design Capture Volume (DCV). 55. The Project shall consider a properly engineered and maintained bio -treatment system only if infiltration, harvesting and use and evapotranspiration cannot be feasibly implemented at the project site. 56. Any portion of [the DCV] that is not infiltrated, harvested and used, evapotranspired, and/or biotreated shall be treated and discharged in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section XII.G. 57. The project shall implement LID practices that treat the 85th percentile storm. 58. Project hardscape areas shall be designed and constructed to provide for drainage into adjacent landscape. 59. Hydromodification / Hydraulic Conditions of Concern — The project shall identify potential Hydraulic Conditions of Concern (HCOC) and implement measures to limit disturbance of natural water bodies and drainage systems, conserve natural areas, protect slopes, channels and minimize significant impacts from urban runoff. 60. CEQA — If CEQA identifies resources requiring Clean Water Act Section 401 Permitting, the applicant shall obtain certification through the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Planning Commission Approved Page 9 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 42. Construct Dryden Street adjacent to the project site at its ultimate half width section, including sidewalk and parkway improvements in conjunction with development. 43. Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Lakeshore Drive and Dryden Street Dryden Street at Lakeshore AVIRRUP qhAll be restF eted te right WrR to Dryden and r ght turn to FeViewed and approved by the Q ty . (Amended by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 44. Construct Stoddard Street adjacent to the project site at its ultimate half width section, to include sidewalk and parkway improvements in conjunction with development. 45. The developer shall be responsible for acquiring right-of-ways in which the developer or the City has no legal title or interest If the developer is unsuccessful in acquiring such right-of-ways the City could assist the developer in the Eminent Domain process at developer's cost. (Added by Staff prior to March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 46. Costs of General Plan circulation improvements and signalization may be at a minimum partially reimbursable through the City's Traffic Impact Fee Program. (TIF) 47. Some of the improvements shown on the Map and/or required by these conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the subdivider may have no title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title or interest. The subdivider shall pay all costs for acquisition of title or interest. 48. A Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare street and drainage improvement plans and specifications. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to City of Lake Elsinore Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC titles 12. and 16.). Street improvement plans shall show existing and future profiles at centerline of street; at top of curb and at centerline of the alley. The profiles and contours will extend to 50' beyond the property limits. 49. Interior streets shall be dedicated and improved as public residential street (40'/50' with a 3' PUE). 50. Traffic Signing and Signing and striping Traffic Engineer. Striping plans shall be required with the street improvement plans. shall be installed in accordance with the plans approved by the City Planning Commission Approved Page 8 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 34. All existing accesses for ingress/egress to Terra Cotta Road from abutting properties must be maintained. 35. Construct Terra Cotta Road at its full width section as a Secondary Highway with a 90' Right of Way from Lakeshore Drive north to the northern boundary of the project. Construction of full improvement of Terra Cotta may be staged as approved by the CitV Engineer. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 36. Construct the extension of Terra Cotta Road from the north project boundary to Nichols Road with a 32' paved roadway width including -an --&Land a 4graded shoulder on the north and south bound sides, as approved by the City Engineer. (Amended by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) 37. Construct the extension of Hoff Avenue from the west project boundary to Terra Cotta Road with a 32' half width, iRG'Yd ng sidewalk and parkway mprevernents GR the RE)Fth _s de in GenjURGt W On with deVe'�m�^r with a paved half width section as approved by the City Engineer. (Amended by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) Will 10-16 39. Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Terra Cotta Road (NS) and Nichols Road (EW) including the following lane geometry: 1 NB left, 1 NB right, 1 EB through, 1 EB right, 1 WB left, 1 WB through, to include the storage length per the project traffic study, width and transitions per City Standards. Fair share mitigation in lieu of construction may be accepted with the amount approved by the City Engineer. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 and March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearings.) 40. Construct Lakeshore Drive adjacent to the project site at its ultimate half width section (60'), including sidewalk and parkway improvements consistent with the adjacent improved sections of Lakeshore Drive and additional 14' width for a NB right turn lane on Lakeshore at Terra Cotta Road in conjunction with development. 41. Install a full intersection traffic signal at all legs of the off -set intersection of Lakeshore Drive and Terra Cotta Road as designed by the Project's Traffic Engineer and reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) Planning Commission Approved Page 7 of 34 City Council March 17. 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 to January . 2015 - Planning Co , - hearing.) • - 27. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. ►4t? Drainage from the project site shall be released from the proiect site in a safe manner as approved by the City Engineer including but not limited to releaseto natural channels, public facilities and/or drainage easements existing on adjacent properties or new letters of drainaqe acceptance (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 29. All natural (historic, pre -development) drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or, shall be collected and conveyed to a safe and appropriate discharge point by a method approved by the City Engineer. 30. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for any off-site grading needed, from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) Improvements 31. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to final map approval. 32. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work in City right-of-way. 33. Terra Cotta Road shall be graded and used as construction access prior to precise grading activity. Prior to building permits, Terra Cotta Road shall be paved, with final lift of asphalt to be placed at completion of building activity. Planning Commission Approved Page 6 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 18. Prior to commencement of grading operations, developer is to provide to the City with a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. All such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Haul route shall be submitted prior to issuance of a grading permit. Hauling in excess of 5,000 cy shall be approved by City Council. (LEMC 15.72.065) 19. All export material shall be discharged into a legal disposal site. No permittee shall process, including, but not limited to, crush, sift, or segregate, excavated earth materials on site for export and commercial sale without first obtaining a permit pursuant to Chapter 14.04 LEMC regarding surface mining and reclamation. (LEMC 15.72.065) manufactured20. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. All slopes greater than 30 feet in heightbe contoured. 21. AppliGaRt shall prateGt- - - the dFainage patterns, i.e., GGnAPR..tlrat'0nC; oF diverson of flow. PretP-ntieR shall be easemeRt. A maiRtenaRG8 mechan.s.m. iR plaGe for aRy private drainage faGil ties GGR6tF6lGtP-d OR site. or off s te. .. dra nage Gnto private off c; tp AF adjaGeRt property shall require a written perm ssion to, grade and/eF a perm ssieR to draiR letter from the ;;ffpr-,tpcj @Rdownpr- (Deleted by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 22. All drainage facilities in this tract shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. A44 Adequate and safe access read for maintenance to of detention/water quality basins shall be provided. (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 23. All storm drain plans connecting to Riverside County Flood Control facilities will be approved by RCFC, and an encroachment permit from RCFCD will be required. 24. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 '/2 x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 25. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots shall be provided per the LEMC. Planning Commission Approved Page 5 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 g. Area Drainage: Theproject!;es vith;,, n� � re (appFox acres 128 24) payable at the rate in „tto,.t at time of Payment Current Rates, �4/est -Lal'" The project lies within West Lake Elsinore (approx. acres 231 and Nichols SW (approx. acres 128) Area Drainage due at grading permit amount payable based on fee at time vesting map application was deemed complete plus inflationary increases in effect at time of payment as provided by LEMC Section 16.72.060. In the event that VTTM 36557 is not adopted or, alternatively, VTTM 36557 expires developer shall pay such fee in effect at the time of payment Current Rates West Lake Elsinore — $5 955/gross acre Nichols SW - $6,080/ gross acre h. Future Impact Fees In the event that VTTM 36557 is not adopted or, alternatively, VTTM 36557 expires developer shall pay all applicable development impact fees in effect at the time of payment (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 and March 17, 2015 Planning Commission hearings.) 13. Street lighting and landscaping on public right-of-way shall be maintained by a maintenance assessment district LLMD 1. The project will annex into LLMD #1 prior to first building permit issuance. 14. All open space and slopes except for public parks and schools and flood control district facilities, outside the public right-of-way will be owned and maintained by either a home owner's association or private property owner. AR qGcpss mad for + shall be prevlded. Adequate access through the developed road system and / or open spaces shall be provided for maintenance and delineated on grading plans (Amended by Staff prior to January 6, 2015 Planning Commission hearing.) 15. Construction traffic shall use Terra Cotta Road via Nichols Road to minimize impacts to existing residents. 16. 10 year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria are exceeded, drainage facilities shall be provided. Grading 17. A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required. Planning Commission Approved Page 4 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 11. The applicant shall install permanent bench marks to Riverside County Standards and at a location to be determined by City Engineer. 12. Applicant shall pay all applicable development fees; including but not all inclusive, TI MF TIC a d area d Rage fees as follows: a. TUMF: Rate/Per Dwelling Unit. Due PF OF to GGGUpaRGY; payable et'=fe ;n effect at time of payment Due prior to occupancy; amount payable based on fee at time the application for VTTM 36557 was deemed complete plus inflationary increases and such other reasonable increases in effect at time of payment as contemplated under LEMC Section 16 83.040 subpart C. In the event that VTTM 36557 is not adopted or, alternatively, VTTM 36557 expires developer shall pay such fee in effect at the time of payment. b. TIF: Rate/Per Dwelling Unit. Due PFFE)r to eGGIJpaRGY� payable at the rate IR _fff `+ at time of payment. Due prior to occupancy; amount payable based on fee at the time the application for VTTM 36557 was deemed complete plus inflationary increases in effect at time of payment as provided by Resolution No. 2002-22 In the event that VTTM 36557 is not adopted or, alternatively VTTM 36557 expires developer shall pay such fee in effect at the time of payment. C. Public Building Facilities Fee Rate/Per Dwelling Unit. Due prior to occupancy amount payable based on fee at the time the application for VTTM 36557 was deemed complete plus inflationary increases in effect at time of payment as provided by Resolution No 2005-96 In the event that VTTM 36557 is not adopted or, alternatively VTTM 36557 expires developer shall pay such fee in effect at the time of payment. d Fire Facilities Fee Rate/Per Dwelling Unit. Due prior to occupancy amount Payable based on fee at the time the application for VTTM 36557 was deemed complete plus inflationary increases in effect at time of payment as provided by Resolution No 2006-69 In the event that VTTM 36557 is not adopted or, alternatively, VTTM 36557 expires developer shall pay such fee in effect at the time of payment. e Library Facilities Fee Rate/Per Dwelling Unit. Due prior to occupancy amount payable based on fee at the time the application for VTTM 36557 was deemed complete In the event that VTTM 36557 is not adopted or, alternatively, VTTM 36557 expires developer shall pay such fee in effect at the time of payment f MSHCP Fee Due prior to occupancy; amount payable based on fee at the time the application for VTTM 36557 was deemed complete plus inflationary increases in effect at time of payment as provided by LEMC Section 16.85.090. In the event that VTTM 36557 is not adopted or, alternatively, VTTM 36557 expires developer shall pay such fee in effect at the time of payment Planning Commission Approved Page 3 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 ,+roes (1.6 acre et) r..* site n. -e ndo-arc th--afea-moo.-the-GOM4:R ..I ..h'� ntP and n at 9 b. The Terracina Specific Plan shall be amended to include a provision that "All Fireplaces shall be natural gas fireplaces only. No wood burning fireplaces shall be allowed." c. The Terracina Specific Plan shall be amended to replace all discussion related to a 2.1 acre project park with revised discussion reflecting a 5.1 acre gross (4.2 acre net) park site within Village 3 as shown on the attached Exhibits 1 and 2 d._ Exhibit IV -2 (Park Exhibit) of the Terracina Specific Plan shall be revised to reflect the revised conceptual park design shown on the attached Exhibit 2 as amended by these conditions of approval e. The Terracina Specific Plan shall be amended to change the number of maximum dwellinq units to 452 and to revise all text and tables to show the reduction in dwelling units and the increase in the park size shown on the attached Exhibit 1 (Amended by Staff prior to July 14, 2015 City Council hearing.) All implementing development projects shall comply with those standards and guidelines contained in the Terracina Specific Plan document. 7. Those issues, standards, guidelines, etc. not addressed in the Terracina Specific Plan will revert to the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and/or Zoning Code in effect at the time that implementing development projects are approved and developed. 8. Density transfers between "Villages" within the Terracina Specific Plan shall not be permitted, except through the Specific Plan Amendment process. 9. Any amendment to the Terracina Specific Plan, even though it may affect only one portion of the Specific Plan, shall be accompanied by a complete specific plan document which includes the entire specific plan, including both changed and unchanged parts. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ ENGINEERING DIVISION General 10. All utilities except electrical over 35 KV shall be placed underground, as approved by the serving utility. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. Planning Commission Approved Page 2 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN SP 2012-01 GENERAL 1. The proposed project (Terracina Specific Plan No. 2012-01) proposes a residential development, with approximately 76.5 acres of residential (maximum of 452 dwelling units), 22 acres of open space, 22.5 acres of roadways, 4.2 acres of park (5.1 gross acres), and 28.2 acres of graded slopes and basins. The southern project boundary is located adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street. Hoff Avenue is located along the northern boundary. 2. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the Terracina Specific Plan No. 2012-01. 3. Within 30 days of project approval, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 4. The City intends to file a Notice of Determination with the Riverside County Clerk's office within five (5) business days from the approval of this specific plan and its related cases by the City Council. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $2,260.00 made payable to the County of Riverside for the filing of a Notice of Determination. The check shall be submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the project's approval. PLANNING DIVISION 5. The Draft Terracina Specific Plan shall be revised to incorporate any corrections and changes required by the Planning Commission and/or City Council and these conditions of approval. A Final Terracina Specific Plan document shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director or designee within 30 days of approval by the City Council. No permit shall be issued until the Terracina Specific Plan document and any required revisions are administratively approved by the Community Development Director or designee. a. The Terracina Specific Plan shall be amended to delete change "Commercial child day care centers (Village 3 Recreation Area only.)" as a use that is allowed within the specific plan subject te a GenditieRal to read "GGMFRerGia' Ghlld day centersGare (NAllaqe 3 0 {fe Area � h'o + + +Ihe reew FeMeRt +h rt +he Planning Commission Approved Page 1 of 34 City Council March 17, 2015 July 14, 2015 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SP 2012-01, GPA 2012-03, ZC 2012-05, VTTM 36557, TTM 36577 July 14, 2015 Page 7 of 7 Prepared by: Richard J. MacHott, LEED Green Associate Planning Manager Grant Taylor Director of Community Development Approved by: Grant Yates City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Aerial Map 3. City Council Resolutions and Ordinance 4. Conditions of Approval for SP 2012-01 5. Conditions of Approval for VTTM 36557 6. Conditions of Approval for TTM 36577 7. Revised Park Site & Conceptual Park Plan 8. Terracina Specific Plan 9. Vesting Tract No. 36557 10. Tract No. 36577 11. Initial Study for Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2015-01 12. Response to Comments 13. Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program 14. City Council Staff Report 5-12-15 15. Planning Commission 12-2-14, 1-6-15 and 3-17-15 Minutes CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SP 2012-01, GPA 2012-03, ZC 2012-05, VTTM 36557, TTM 36577 July 14, 2015 Page 6 of 7 substantial evidence that any potential impacts to the environment associated with the Project could be mitigated to less than significant levels. For this reason, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2015-01 was prepared in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.: "CEQX) and the State Implementation Guidelines for CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15000, et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines") and applicable requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore, to disclose potential environmental impacts and to propose mitigation for those impacts. City staff received four comment letters on the MND during the 30 -day public review comment period which began on October 16, 2014 and ended on November 17, 2014. Copies of the comment letters and responses to those letters are attached to this staff report. Fiscal Impact The time and costs related to processing Specific Plan No. 2012-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No. 2012-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557, and Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 have been covered by the Developer Deposit paid for by the applicant. No General Fund budgets have been allocated or used in the processing of this application. In order to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City, the project has been conditioned that the applicant consent to the formation of a Community Facilities District or annex into the proposed Community Facilities District No. 2015-1 (Safety) the Law Enforcement, Fire and Paramedic Services Mello -Roos Community Facilities District (VTTM 36557 Condition of Approval No. 151). Additionally, VTTM 36557 Condition of Approval 152 requires the applicant to consent to the formation of a Community Facilities District or annex into the proposed Community Facilities District No. 2015-2 (Maintenance Services) to fund the on- going operation and maintenance of the public right-of-way landscaped areas and neighborhood parks to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public right-of- way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison, including parkways, open space and public storm drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project. The same conditions of approval have been applied to the Terracina Specific Plan (Conditions 124 and 125). The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557 is also conditioned for payment of all applicable development impact fees at the rate in effect at the time the application for VTTM 36557 was deemed complete plus inflationary increases and such other reasonable increases in effect at time of payment as contemplated under the current LEMC. Future development impact fees adopted by the City will not apply to this project, unless VTTM 36557 is not adopted or, alternatively, VTTM 36557 expires. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SP 2012-01, GPA 2012-03, ZC 2012-05, VTTM 36557, TTM 36577 July 14, 2015 Page 5 of 7 Lakeshore are both "Arterials" and the majority of traffic turns either right or left from Terra Cotta onto Lakeshore Drive. In addition, realigning Terra Cotta Road would result in a very high retaining wall. Turning movements from Dryden Street to Lakeshore Drive The applicants and staff discussed several alternatives to address turning movements from Dryden Street to Lakeshore Drive. After discussing the alternatives, the applicants have agreed to install a traffic signal at the intersection of Dryden Street and Lakeshore Drive. With a traffic signal, existing left turn movements from Dryden onto Lakeshore Drive will be preserved. The project has been conditioned for the installation of the signal prior to final inspection and occupancy of the 150'" dwelling unit. (SP Condition No. 98 & VTTM Condition No. 121) The installation of block walls at the rear of existing residential lots on Terra Cotta Consideration of the installation of block walls at the rear of existing residential lots backing onto Terra Cotta Road was reviewed by staff and the applicants. A Noise Impact Analysis was prepared as part of the California Environmental Impact Report (CEQA) project evaluation and summarized in the Initial Study. The Noise Impact Analysis evaluated both project -related noise impacts and General Plan buildout -related noise impacts along Terra Cotta Road. The analysis determined that project -related noise impacts when added to existing noise levels would be 55.6 dBA Ldn in that road segment adjacent to the existing residences. This represents an increase of 4.8 dBA Ldn over existing noise levels. However, these noise levels fall below the level of significance (increase of 5.0 dBA or overall level exceeding 65 dBA) under CEQA and no mitigation is required. The Noise Impact Analysis evaluation of noise levels along Terra Cotta at General Plan buildout determined that unmitigated noise levels along Terra Cotta could reach up to 70.5 DBA Ldn. Therefore, in order to mitigate the buildout noise levels upon the proposed project, a block wall is required along the project's frontage. The rear of the existing residential properties backing onto Terra Cotta Road between Lakeshore Drive and the project boundaries total approximately 1,150 linear feet. The Engineering Division estimates the cost to install 6 -foot high block walls would total approximately $180,000. The project applicants have decided that because the project - related noise levels are below the level of significance along Terra Cotta; that they will not offer to build a wall along the rear of the existing residences on Terra Cotta outside of the project boundaries. Environmental Determination The City conducted an Initial Study to determine if the Project would result in significant impacts on the environment. Based upon the results of the Initial Study, there was CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SP 2012-01, GPA 2012-03, ZC 2012-05, VTTM 36557, TTM 36577 July 14, 2015 Page 4 of 7 The need for the applicant/property owner to clean up the trash and other debris from the subject property. Following the City Council hearing on May 12, 2015 the applicant/property owner cleaned up the project site; removing trash and debris as directed by the City Council. Park size and amenities whether it meets the proiect's park requirements. The City's implementation of the Quimby Act requires developments to provide five (5) acres of useable park land per 1,000 population or to pay equivalent in -lieu fees. Using this standard, the Terracina project is required to provide 7.9 acres of usable park land based upon 468 dwelling units and 3.37 persons per dwelling unit. Originally, the Terracina Specific Plan and VTTM 36557 contained a 1.6 acre net (2.1 acre gross) Homeowners Association (HOA) maintained park facility centrally located in Village 3 for use by residents of the entire project. Additionally, the applicant proposed that "Commercial child day care centers" be allowed at the Village 3 recreation area/park subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. In response to the City Council's concerns, the applicant has proposed redesigning the project to replace the HOA -maintained park with a 5.1 acre gross (4.2 acre net) City - maintained fully improved turn -key park (Attachment 7). City staff has found that the proposed 5.1 -acre City -maintained park meets the project's park requirements, with a reduction in the required acreage off -set by the provision of a fully -improved park. Both the Specific Plan and the Vesting Tentative Tract have been conditioned for the construction and conveyance to the City of the park. (SP Conditions 107 through 121 & VTTM Conditions 136 through 149) Installation of the missing portion of sidewalk on the west side of Terra Cotta Road. The applicant has agreed to provide the missing portion of sidewalk as discussed by the City Council. The project has been conditioned that the missing sidewalk be constructed prior to the issuance of the first building permit. (SP Condition No. 92 & VTTM Condition No. 121). Realignment of Terra Cotta Road to match up with existing street on opposite side of Lakeshore Drive. The City Council requested that the applicant and staff review the design of the off-set(tee) intersection of Terra Cotta Road and Lakeshore Drive and determine the feasibility of realigning Terra Cotta to match up with the existing street on the opposite side of Lakeshore Drive. The City's Engineering Division reviewed the subject development's proposal to construct a tee intersection at Terra Cotta Road and Lakeshore Drive and concurred that a tee intersection is preferred over a thru street since Terra Cotta and CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SP 2012-01, GPA 2012-03, ZC 2012-05, VTTM 36557, TTM 36577 July 14, 2015 Page 3 of 7 Project Description Terracina Specific Plan No. 2012-01 The applicant requests approval of the Terracina Specific Plan No. 2012-01 in order to develop a master planned development. The proposed Specific Plan divides the irregular- shaped 151 -acre site into six (6) separate, individual planning areas or "villages" ranging in size from 7.8 acres to 29.9 acres. I hese planning areas will have a variety of lot sizes offering a variety of housing product in an effort to create distinction in the community. The six (6) Villages are broken down into only two (2) land use designations: "Low", and "Low Medium" density residential. The Low density designation applies only to Village 1 while Villages 2 through 6 are Low -Medium designations. Each of the villages serves as a different phase of development. General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03/Zone Change No. 2012-05 General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03 is a request to amend the land use designation on the subject property from Low -Medium Density Residential (LMR) and Low Density Residential (LR) to Specific Plan (SP). Zone Change No. 2012-05 is a request to change the zoning on the subject property from R-1 (Single -Family Residential District) to SP (Specific Plan). Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557 Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 36557 proposes the subdivision of the 150.8 acres project site into 468 single-family residential lots, one 2.1 acre gross (1.6 acre net) park site, seven landscape lots, four open space lots, one sewer lift station lot and three Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and drainage basin lots. However, as described below, the vesting tentative map will be modified to reduce the number of single-family lots to 452 and to increase the park site to 5.1 acres gross. Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 is a proposed subdivision of the project site into six (6) lots for the purpose of Financing and Conveyance only. No grading permits, building permits or other development will be allowed with this approval. City Council Issues The following describes how the six issues identified by the City Council were addressed by the project applicants and staff: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SP 2012-01, GPA 2012-03, ZC 2012-05, VTTM 36557, TTM 36577 July 14, 2015 Page 2 of 7 4. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Approving General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-_; A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557, Subdividing 150.8 Acres. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore Approving Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 Subdividing 150.8 Acres Into Six Lots For Finance And Conveyance Purposes. Background The subject project was considered by the City Council at a public hearing on May 12, 2015. The City Council took public testimony from several members of the public and from the applicants. The City Council continued the matter to its July 14, 2015 meeting in order for the applicants to work with staff to resolve the following issues: • The need for the applicant/property owner to clean up the trash and other debris from the subject property. • Park size and amenities and whether it meets the project's park requirements. • Installation of the missing portion of sidewalk on the west side of Terra Cotta Road. • Realignment of Terra Cotta Road to match up with existing street on opposite side of Lakeshore Drive. • Turning movements from Dryden Street to Lakeshore Drive • The installation of block walls at the rear of existing residential lots on Terra Cotta. These issues are discussed below. Project Location The project site is located southwesterly of Interstate 15 on the northern side of existing Lakeshore Drive between Dryden Street and Terra Cotta Road. The northern portion of the site is bounded by Dolbeer Street and Holt Avenue. The 150.8 -acre irregular-shaped site is characterized by a hill or knoll in the westerly portion and gently rolling terrain for the remainder of the site extending to the east. Lakeshore Drive, Terra Cotta Road, Dryden Street, Stoddard Street, Swan Avenue, Dolbeer Street, Hoff Avenue, Grey Avenue and Pierce Street all currently provide frontage and access to and from the site by existing street improvements and/or dedicated right-of-way. CIT) Cif c LAKE- LS1110R REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor And Members of the City Council FROM: Grant Yates City Manager DATE: July 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and Related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No. 2012-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557, and Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 - Applications by Spectrum Communities, Proposing a 150.8 -Acre Residential Development Located Adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and extending to Hoff Avenue. APPLICANT/ Terracina Investors, LLC, c/o Spectrum Communities, 3334 E. OWNER Coast Highway #605, Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 Recommendation The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions: Adopt Resolution No. 2015- ; A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2015-01 For The Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and Related Applications. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-_; A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Adopting Findings of Consistency with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan for the Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and Related Applications. 3. Approve and Introduce by title only and waive further reading of Ordinance No. 2015 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California Adopting the Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and Adopting Zone Change No. 2012-05. RESOLUTION NO. 2015- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2015-01 FOR THE TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN (SP NO. 2012-01) AND RELATED APPLICATIONS WHEREAS, Spectrum Communities has filed applications with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of the Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No. 2012-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 36557, and Tentative Tract Map 36577 ("Project") for a residential development, with approximately 76.5 acres of residential (452 dwelling units), 22 acres of open space, 22.5 acres of roadways, 4.2 acres of park (5.1 gross acres), and 28.2 acres of graded slopes and basins, located adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and extending to Hoff Avenue (APN 378-040-004 through 007, 378-040-012, 389-180-001 and 002, and 389-190-002); and WHEREAS, the Project is subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.: "CEQA") and the State Implementation Guidelines for CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15000, et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines") because the Project involves an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and involves the issuance of a lease, permit license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies (Public Resources Code Section 21065); and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15063, the City conducted an Initial Study to determine if the Project would have a significant effect on the environment. The Initial Study revealed that the project would have potentially significant environmental impacts but those potentially significant impacts could be mitigated to less than significant levels, and WHEREAS, based upon the results of the Initial Study, and based upon the standards set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15070, it was determined that it was appropriate to prepare and circulate Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2014-02 for the Project (the "Mitigated Negative Declaration"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15072, on September 26, 2013 the City duly issued a notice of intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration; and in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was made available for public review and comment for thirty days beginning on September 26, 2013 and ending on October 25, 2013; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15072, on October 16, 2014 the City duly issued a notice of intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration; and in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015-_ PAGE 2 OF 5 Declaration was made available for public review and comment for thirty days beginning on October 16, 2014 and ending on November 17, 2014; and WHEREAS, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP") for the Project has been prepared in accordance with Section 21081.6 of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to proposed Specific Plans, General Amendments, Zone Changes, and the subdivision of land; and WHEREAS, on December 2, 2014, January 6, 2015, and March 17, 2015 at duly noticed public hearings the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-06 recommending that the City Council adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2014-02 and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No. 2012- 05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 36557, and Tentative Tract Map 36577; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.188.050 and Section 17.204.130 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City Council has the authority to approve, modify or conditions, or deny zone changes, specific plans and ; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65358 empowers the legislative body to amend all or part of an adopted general plan if to do so would be in the public interest and so long as no mandatory element of the general plan is amended more frequently than four times during any calendar year; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section LEMC Section 16.24.120 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code ("LEMC") the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has the responsibility of acting on a tentative map after receipt of the Planning Commission action by either approving, conditionally approving or disapproving it; and WHEREAS, on May 12, 2015 and July 14, 2015, at duly noticed public hearings, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into these findings by this reference. SECTION 2. The City Council has evaluated all comments, written and oral, received from persons who have reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The City Council hereby finds and determines that all public comments have been addressed. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015-_ PAGE 3OF5 SECTION 3. The City Council hereby finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project is adequate and has been completed in accordance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's procedures for implementation of CEQA; and recommends to the City Council that it make the same finding. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration represents the independent judgment of the City. SECTION 4. The City Council further finds and determines that none of the circumstances listed in CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5 requiring an additional recirculation of the Mitigated Negative Declaration are present and that it would be appropriate to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as proposed. SECTION 5. The City Council hereby makes, adopts, and incorporates the following findings regarding the lack of potential environmental impacts of the Project and the analysis and conclusions set forth in the Mitigated Negative Declaration: 1. Revisions in the Project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study was released for public review and mitigation measures set forth in the Initial Study would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur. Based upon the Initial Study conducted for the Project, there is substantial evidence suggesting that all potential impacts to the environment resulting from the Project can be mitigated to less than significant levels. All appropriate and feasible mitigation has been incorporated into the Project design. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan contains an implementation program for each mitigation measure. After implementation of the mitigation contained in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan, potential environmental impacts are effectively reduced to less than significant levels. 2. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the City Council including the initial study and any comments received, that the Project will have significant effect on the environment. Pursuant to the evidence received, including comment letters, and in the light of the whole record presented, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 6. Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and the attached conditions of approval, the City Council hereby adopts Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2014-02 and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No. 2012-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 36557, and Tentative Tract Map 36577. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015-_ PAGE 4 OF 5 SECTION 7. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of July 2015, by the following vote: Steve Manos, Mayor City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Leibold, City Attorney CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015-_ PAGE 5 OF 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SS CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2015-_ was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of July, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2015- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN (SP NO. 2012-01) AND RELATED APPLICATIONS WHEREAS, Spectrum Communities, has filed applications with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of the Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No. 2012-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 36557, and Tentative Tract Map 36577 ("Project') for a residential development, with approximately 76.5 acres of residential (452 dwelling units), 22 acres of open space, 22.5 acres of roadways, 4.2 acres of park (5.1 gross acres), and 28.2 acres of graded slopes and basins, located adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and extending to Hoff Avenue (APN 378-040-004 through 007, 378-040-012, 389-180-001 and 002, and 389-190-002); and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) requires that all projects which are proposed on land covered by an MSHCP criteria cell and which require discretionary approval by the legislative body undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process ("LEAP") and a Joint Project Review ("JPR") between the City and the Regional Conservation Authority ("RCA") prior to public review of the project applications; and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 further requires that development projects not within an MSHCP criteria cell must be analyzed pursuant to the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements"; and WHEREAS, the Project is discretionary in nature and requires review and approval by the Planning Commission and/or City Council; and WHEREAS, the Project is not within an MSHCP Criteria Cell, Core or Linkage, but are within the Elsinore Plan Area of the MSHCP, and therefore, the Project was reviewed pursuant to the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements"; and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that the City adopt consistency findings prior to approving any discretionary project entitlements for development of property that is subject to the MSHCP; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to proposed Specific Plans, General Amendments, Zone Changes, and the subdivision of land; and WHEREAS, on December 2, 2014, January 6, 2015, and March 17, 2015 at duly noticed public hearings the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-07 recommending CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 2 of 6 that the City Council adopt findings that Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No. 2012-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 36557, and Tentative Tract Map 36577 are consistent with the MSHCP; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.188.050 and Section 17.204.130 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City Council has the authority to approve, modify or conditions, or deny zone changes, specific plans and ; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65358 empowers the legislative body to amend all or part of an adopted general plan if to do so would be in the public interest and so long as no mandatory element of the general plan is amended more frequently than four times during any calendar year; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section LEMC Section 16.24.120 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code ("LEMC") the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has the responsibility of acting on a tentative map after receipt of the Planning Commission action by either approving, conditionally approving or disapproving it; and WHEREAS, on May 12, 2015 and July 14, 2015, at duly noticed public hearings, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council has reviewed and analyzed the proposed applications and their consistency with the MSHCP prior to making a decision to adopt Findings of Consistency with the MSHCP for Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No. 2012-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 36557, and Tentative Tract Map 36577. SECTION 2. That in accordance with the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, and the MSHCP, Findings for adoption have been made as follows: 1. The proposed project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City must make an MSHCP Consistency Finding before approval. The proposed project includes a specific plan and related general plan amendment, zone change, and vesting tentative tract map that require a number of discretionary approvals from the City, including CEQA review. Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Resolution, the project has been reviewed for MSHCP consistency, including consistency with "Other Plan Requirements." These include the Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal pool Guidelines (MSHCP, Section 6.1.2), Protection of Narrow Endemic CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015-_ PAGE 3 of 6 Plant Species Guidelines (MSHCP, Section 6.1.3), Additional Survey Needs and Procedures (MSHCP, Section 6.3.2), Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines (MSHCP, Section 6.1.4), Vegetation Mapping (MSHCP, Section 65, 1) requirements, Fuels Management Guidelines (MSHCP, Section 6.4), and payment of the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee (MSHCP Ordinance, Section 4). 2. The proposed project is not subject to the City's LEAP (Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process) and the County's Joint Project Review processes. The proposed project is not located within an MSHCP Criteria Cell area, therefore, no formal LEAP submittal was required. However, the project is still required to demonstrate compliance with "Other Plan Requirements." The project is in compliance as described further below. 3. The proposed project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools Guidelines. No vernal pools exist on the site and therefore vernal pool species are not expected to occur. Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP focuses on protection of riparian/riverine areas and vernal pool habitat types based on their value in the conservation of a number of MSHCP-covered species. The project will impact 1.55 acres of MSHCP riparian/riverine, including 1.13 acres of riparian vegetation and 0.42 acre of unvegetated riverine areas. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 6.1.2, a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Protection (DBESP) was prepared. The DBESP concluded that avoidance of the impacted riparian/riverine areas is infeasible and that through the acquisition of mitigation credits supporting equal or superior values, the project would replace lost functions and values and would be considered a biologically equivalent or superior project. 4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines. The proposed project site is located within the Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area (NEPSSA) as shown on Figure 6-1 of the MSHCP. Focused plant surveys were conducted for species identified under Section 6.1.3 of the MSHCP in areas of the project site that contained potentially suitable habitat, and none of the NEPSSA target species were identified onsite. As such, the project is compliant with MSHCP Section 6.1.3. 5. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. The MSHCP requires additional surveys for certain species if the project is located in CASSA, Amphibian Species Survey Area with Critical Area, Burrowing CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 4 of 6 Owl Survey Areas with Criteria Area, and Mammal Species Survey Areas with Criteria Areas of the MSHCP. The project site is located outside of any CASSA for plants and mammals and no CASSA plant species were observed during the focused surveys for the site. The proposed project is located within the survey area identified for the burrowing owl. Breeding season protocol surveys for the western burrowing owl were conducted pursuant to the Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions as set forth by the MSHCP and resulted in negative findings of burrowing owl and sign. As required by the MSHCP, mitigation has been included requiring pre -construction focused species surveys within 30 -days prior to any ground -disturbing activities at the project site where suitable habitat is present and requiring appropriate mitigation if active nests are located. Based upon the above, it can be concluded that the proposed project is consistent with the provisions of the MSHCP. 6. The proposed project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines. The MSHCP Urban/Wildland Interface Guidelines are intended to address indirect effects associated with locating development in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area. Indirect impacts to the off-site potential Conservation Area are discussed above under Item 4a, b for the following issues: Drainage, Toxics, Lighting, Noise, Invasive species, Barriers, and Grading/Land Development. As required by the MSHCP, mitigation has been included that would reduce indirect impacts to a less -than -significant level, and would be consistent with the MSHCP. 7. The proposed project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements. Vegetation mapping was conducted as part of the biological surveys conducted on the entire Project Site and is consistent with the MSHCP Section 6.3.1 Vegetation Mapping requirements. 8. The proposed project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines. The Fuels Management Guidelines presented in Section 6.4 of the MSHCP are intended to address brush management activities around new development within or adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area and shall be implemented as part of the Project. As such, the Project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines. 9. The proposed project is conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015-_ PAGE 5 of 6 The developer will be required to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. 10. The proposed project overall is consistent with the MSHCP. The Project is consistent with all applicable provisions of the MSHCP. No further actions related to the MSHCP are required. SECTION 3. Based upon the evidence presented and the above findings, the City Council hereby adopts findings that Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01) and related General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, Zone Change No. 2012-05, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 36557, and Tentative Tract Map 36577 are consistent with the MSHCP. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of July 2015, by the following vote: Steve Manos, Mayor City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Leibold, City Attorney CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 6 of 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SS CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2015-_ was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of July, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 2015 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE TERRACINA SPECIFIC PLAN (SP NO. 2012-01) AND ADOPTING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2012-05 WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Spectrum Communities (the "Developer") requesting approval of the Terracina Specific Plan No. 2012-01 and its related cases ("Project") relating to properties located adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and extending to Hoff Avenue (APN 378-040-004 through 007, 378-040-012, 389-180-001 and 002, and 389-190-002) ("the Properties'); and WHEREAS, Spectrum Communities has also filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore to change the zoning of the City's Official Zoning Map ("Zone Change") for properties located adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and extending to Hoff Avenue; said Zone Change requesting to change the zoning on the subject property (APN 378-040-004 through 007, 378-040-012, 389- 180-001 and 002, and 389-190-002) ("the Properties") from R-1 (Single -Family Residential District) SP (Specific Plan); and WHEREAS, the proposed Specific Plan with its maximum of 448 dwelling units is consistent with the subject property's adopted Low Density Residential ("LDR") and Low -Medium Density Residential ("LMR") General Plan Land Use Designations which would allow a maximum of 824 dwelling units. WHEREAS, the Specific Plan and Zone Change conform to and are consistent with the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03 that accompany them for the Properties; and WHEREAS, the Project is subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.: "CEQA") and the State Implementation Guidelines for CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15000, et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines") because the Project involves an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and involves the issuance of a lease, permit license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies (Public Resources Code Section 21065); and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15063, the City conducted an Initial Study to determine if the Project would have a significant effect on the environment. The Initial Study revealed that the project would have potentially significant environmental impacts but those potentially significant impacts could be mitigated to less than significant levels; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15072, on October 16, 2014 the City duly issued a notice of intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration; and in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 2015 - PAGE 2 OF 5 Declaration was made available for public review and comment for thirty days beginning on October 16, 2014 and ending on November 17, 2014. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to proposed Specific Plans, General Amendments, Zone Changes, and the subdivision of land; and WHEREAS, on December 2, 2014, January 6, 2015, and March 17, 2015 at duly noticed public hearings the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-08 recommending that the City Council approve Terracina Specific Plan No. 2012-01 and Zone Change No. 2012-05 by ordinance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.188.050 and Section 17.204.130 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City Council has the authority to approve, modify or conditions, or deny zone changes, specific plans and ; and WHEREAS, on May 12, 2015 and July 14, 2015, at duly noticed public hearings, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: ,.. SECTION 1. The City Council has reviewed and analyzed the proposed Terracina Specific Plan No. 2012-01 and Zone Change No. 2012-05 pursuant to the California Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 65000 et sec.), the Lake Elsinore General Plan and proposed General Plan Amendment, and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and finds and determines that the proposed Terracina Specific Plan No. 2012-01 and Zone Change No. 2012-05 are consistent with the requirements of California Planning and Zoning Law and with the goals and policies of the Lake Elsinore General Plan and proposed General Plan Amendment and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. SECTION 2. The City Council has considered Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2014-02 and the Mitigation Measures appertaining thereto. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2014-02 was prepared pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. Appropriate findings were made, and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2014-02 provides the necessary environmental clearance for Terracina Specific Plan No. 2012-01 and Zone Change No. 2012-05. SECTION 3. That in accordance with the State Planning and Zoning Law and Chapter 17.204 (SPD Specific Plan District) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 2015 - PAGE 3 OF 5 City Council hereby makes the following findings for the approval of the Terracina Specific Plan No. 2012-01 and Zone Change No. 2012-05: 1. The location and design of the proposed development shall be consistent with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan and with any other applicable plan or policies adopted by the City. The land uses and densities associated with the Terracina Specific Plan provide a variety of lot and home size product type in order to implement the objectives of the City's General Plan and the project proponents. It also includes a land use change from the existing General Plan designations of Low Density Residential and Low -Medium Density Residential for the 151 -acre site. Using these designations, the City's General Plan allows a maximum of 824 dwelling units. The proposed project allows a maximum of 452 homes. 2. The proposed Specific Plan and Zone Change will permit reasonable development of the area consistent with its constraints and will make the area more compatible with adjacent properties. The proposed Terracina Specific Plan and SP zoning will allow for the development of the Terracina Specific Plan, a master planned development with approximately 76.5 acres of single-family residential development (452 dwelling units), 22 acres of open space, 22.5 acres of roadways, 4.2 acres of park (5.1 gross acres), and 28.2 acres of graded slopes and basins. 3. All vehicular traffic generated by the development, either in phased increments or at full build -out, is to be accommodated safely and without causing undue congestion upon adjoining streets. A Traffic Impact Analysis dated January 29, 2014, was prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. for the Terracina Specific Plan and its related cases. The Traffic Impact Analysis provided mitigation measures through all phases of development of the specific plan. Additionally the Terracina Specific Plan has been conditioned to extend Terra Cotta Road from the project boundary to Nichols Road; thereby affording it the opportunity to take access from two main roadways (Lakeshore and Nichols Road), as well as providing additional paved access to existing residential development in proximity to the project site. 4. The overall design of the specific plan will produce an attractive, efficient and stable development. Design standards and guidelines have been incorporated into the specific plan to ensure an attractive, efficient and vibrant project. Visual graphics and photos accompany the design guidelines that capture the atmosphere and cohesiveness that the specific plan seeks to ernulate. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 2015 - PAGE 4 OF 5 5. The proposed Specific Plan and Zone Change will not be a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. The proposed Zone Change has been analyzed relative to its potential to have detrimental effects and conditions have been imposed on the subject project to ensure that the health, safety and welfare of surrounding residents will be protected. 6. The proposed development will not have a significant effect on the environment. The effects of the project has been analyzed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study (SCH #2013091083) prepared for the Terracina Specific Plan and its related cases, and adequate mitigation measures have been prepared where necessary. SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented, both written and testimonial, and the above findings, and the attached conditions of approval, the City Council hereby adopts Terracina Specific Plan No. 2012-01 and Zone Change No. 2012-05 by ordinance. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. APPROVED AND INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 14th day of July 2015; and Adopted at the regular City Council meeting of , 2015. Steve Manos, Mayor City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 2015 - PAGE 5 OF 5 Barbara Leibold, City Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SS CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Ordinance No. 2015-_ was introduced at the regular City Council meeting of July 14, 2015, and adopted at the regular meeting of , 2015, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2015- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2012-03 WHEREAS, Spectrum Communities has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore to amend the City's General Plan Land Use designations ("General Plan Amendment") for properties located adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and extending to Hoff Avenue; said General Plan Amendment requesting an amendment of the land use designation on Assessor's Parcel Numbers 378-040-004 and 005, 389-180-001 and 002, and 389-190-002 from Low -Medium Density Residential (LMR) to Specific Plan (SP) and on Assessor's Parcel Numbers 378-040-006, 007 and 012 from Low Density Residential (LR) to Specific Plan (SP) ("the Properties"); and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65358 empowers the legislative body to amend all or part of an adopted general plan if to do so would be in the public interest and so long as no mandatory element of the general plan is amended more frequently than four times during any calendar year; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03 (the "project") is part of the City's First (151) Cycle amendments to the Lake Elsinore General Plan's Land Use Element for the 2015 calendar year; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to proposed General Amendments; and WHEREAS, on December 2, 2014, January 6, 2015, and March 17, 2015 at duly noticed public hearings the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-09 recommending City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03; and WHEREAS, on May 12, 2015 and July 14, 2015, at duly noticed public hearings, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council has reviewed and analyzed the proposed General Plan Amendment pursuant to the California Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 65000 et seq.), the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and finds and determines that the proposed General Plan Amendment is CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 2 of 4 consistent with the requirements of California Planning and Zoning Law and with the goals and policies of the Lake Elsinore General Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. SECTION 2. The City Council has considered Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2014-02 and the Mitigation Measures appertaining thereto. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2014-02 was prepared pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. Appropriate findings were made, and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2014-02 provides the necessary environmental clearance for General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03. SECTION 3. That in accordance with the California Planning and Zoning Law and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City Council hereby makes the following findings for the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03: The proposed General Plan Amendment will not be a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. a. The proposed General Plan Amendment has been analyzed relative to its potential to have detrimental effects and conditions have been imposed on the subject project to ensure that the health, safety and welfare of surrounding residents will be protected. b. The application to include the Specific Plan designation on the properties adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street and extending to Hoff Avenue, reflects the Terracina Specific Plan which has been conditioned to extend Terra Cotta Road and Pierce Street from the project boundary to Nichols Road; thereby affording it the opportunity to take access from two main roadways (Lakeshore and Nichols Road), as well as providing additional paved access to existing residential development in proximity to the project site. 2. The proposed General Plan Amendment will permit reasonable development of the area consistent with its constraints. The proposed SP designation will allow for the development of the Terracina Specific Plan, a master planned development with approximately 76.5 acres of single-family residential development (452 dwelling units), 22 acres of open space, 22.5 acres of roadways, 4.2 acres of park (5.1 gross acres), and 28.2 acres of graded slopes and basins. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - PAGE 3 of 4 3. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use density, intensity and usage more in character with the subject property's location, access, and constraints. The land uses and densities associated with the Terracina Specific Plan provide a variety of lot and home size product type in order to implement the objectives of the City's General Plan and the project proponents. It also includes a land use change from the existing General Plan designations of Low Density Residential and Low -Medium Density Residential for the 151 -acre site. Using these designations, the City's General Plan allows a maximum of 824 dwelling units. The proposed project allows a maximum of 452 homes. 4. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment. The effects of the General Plan Amendment has been analyzed in the Mitigated Negative Declarationllnitial Study (SCH #2013091083) prepared for the Terracina Specific Plan and its related cases, and adequate mitigation measures have been prepared where necessary. SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented, both written and testimonial, and the above findings, the City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of July 2015, by the following vote: Steve Manos, Mayor City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015-_ PAGE 4 of 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Leibold, City Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE } SS CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE J I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2015- was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of July, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2015- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36557 SUBDIVIDING 150.8 ACRES WHEREAS, Spectrum Communities filed an application for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557 (the "project') with the City of Lake Elsinore for a residential subdivision of 150.8+ acres of unimproved property located adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and extending to Hoff Avenue (APN 378-040-004 through 007, 378-040-012, 389-180-001 and 002, and 389-190- 002); and WHEREAS, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557 proposes to subdivide 150.8 acres located adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and extending to Hoff Avenue, into 452 single-family residential lots, one 5.1 acre gross (4.2 acre net) park site, seven landscape lots, four open space lots, one sewer lift station lot and three Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and drainage basin lots; and WHEREAS, Spectrum Communities has also filed applications with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of related applications for the Terracina Specific Plan (SP No. 2012-01), General Plan Amendment No. 2012-03, and Zone Change No. 2012- 05; and WHEREAS, the Project is subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.: "CEQA") and the State Implementation Guidelines for CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15000, et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines") because the Project involves an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and involves the issuance of a lease, permit license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies (Public Resources Code Section 21065); and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15063, the City conducted an Initial Study to determine if the Project would have a significant effect on the environment. The Initial Study revealed that the project would have potentially significant environmental impacts but those potentially significant impacts could be mitigated to less than significant levels; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15072, on October 16, 2014 the City duly issued a notice of intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration; and in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was made available for public review and comment for thirty days beginning on October 16, 2014 and ending on November 17, 2014. WHEREAS, pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Chapter 16.24 (Tentative Map) the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - _ PAGE 2 OF 5 making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the subdivision of land, and, WHEREAS, on December 2, 2014, January 6, 2015 and March 17, 2015 at duly noticed public hearings the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-10 recommending that the City Council approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36557; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section LEMC Section 16.24.120 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code ("LEMC") the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has the responsibility of acting on a tentative map after receipt of the Planning Commission action by either approving, conditionally approving or disapproving it; and WHEREAS, on May 12, 2015 and July 14, 2015, at duly noticed public hearings, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council has reviewed and analyzed the proposed project pursuant to the California Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 65000 et sec.), the Lake Elsinore General Plan and proposed General Plan Amendment, and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and finds and determines that the proposed Vesting Tentative Tract No. 36557 is consistent with the requirements of California Planning and Zoning Law and with the goals and policies of the Lake Elsinore General Plan and proposed General Plan Amendment and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. SECTION 2. The City Council has considered Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2014-02 and the Mitigation Measures appertaining thereto. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2014-02 was prepared pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. Appropriate findings were made, and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2014-02 provides the necessary environmental clearance for Vesting Tentative Tract No. 36557. SECTION 3. That in accordance with the California Planning and Zoning Laws and the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City Council makes the following findings for Vesting Tentative Tract No. 36557: 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvements, is consistent with the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan and proposed General Plan Amendment, and with the proposed Terracina Specific Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - _ PAGE 3 OF 5 a. The design of the proposed map, approximately 76.5 acres of residential (452 dwelling units), 22 acres of open space, 22.5 acres of roadways, 4.2 acres of park (5.1 gross acres), and 28.2 acres of graded slopes and basins, is consistent with the proposed Terracina Specific Plan, and proposed General Plan Amendment. b. The land uses and densities associated with the Terracina Specific Plan provide a variety of lot and home size product type in order to implement the objectives of the City's General Plan and the project proponents. It also includes a land use change from the existing General Plan designations of Low Density Residential and Low - Medium Density Residential for the 151 -acre site. Using these designations, the City's General Plan allows a maximum of 824 dwelling units. The proposed project allows a maximum of 452 homes. 2. The effects this project is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources have been considered and balanced. The Vested Tract Map is consistent with the proposed Terracina Specific Plan land use plan, development and design standards, and programs, and all other appropriate requirements contained in the General Plan. Vested Tentative Tract Map No. 36557 is consistent with Housing Element Policy 3.1 to "Use the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, other land use and development plans, and the development process to provide housing sites that meet the identified local need." 3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant environmental impact. The project has been adequately conditioned by all applicable departments and agencies and will not therefore result in any significant environmental impacts. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented, both written and testimonial, and the above findings, and the attached conditions of approval, the City Council hereby approves Vesting Tentative Tract No. 36557. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - _ PAGE 4 OF 5 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 14th day of July, 2015. Steve Manos, Mayor City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Leibold, City Attorney CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - _ PAGE 5 OF 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SS CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2015-_ was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of July, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2015- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36577 SUBDIVIDING 150.8 ACRES INTO SIX LOTS FOR FINANCE AND CONVEYANCE PURPOSES WHEREAS, Spectrum Communities filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 (the "project') to subdivide 150.8+ acres of unimproved property located adjacent to Lakeshore Drive, between Terra Cotta Road and Dryden Street, and extending to Hoff Avenue (APN 378- 040-004 through 007, 378-040-012, 389-180-001 and 002, and 389-190-002) into six lots for Finance and Conveyance Purposes; and WHEREAS, the Project is subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.: "CEQA") and the State Implementation Guidelines for CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15000, et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines") because the Project involves an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and involves the issuance of a lease, permit license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies (Public Resources Code Section 21065); and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15063, the City conducted an Initial Study to determine if the Project would have a significant effect on the environment. The Initial Study revealed that the project would have potentially significant environmental impacts but those potentially significant impacts could be mitigated to less than significant levels; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15072, on October 16, 2014 the City duly issued a notice of intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration; and in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was made available for public review and comment for thirty days beginning on October 16, 2014 and ending on November 17, 2014. WHEREAS, pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) Chapter 16.24 (Tentative Map) the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to the subdivision of land; and, WHEREAS, on December 2, 2014, January 6, 2015 and March 17, 2015 at duly noticed public hearings the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item; and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-11 recommending that the City Council approve Tentative Tract Map No. 36577; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section LEMC Section 16.24.120 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code ("LEMC') the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has the responsibility of acting on a tentative map after receipt of the Planning Commission action by either approving, conditionally approving or disapproving it; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - _ PAGE 2 OF 4 WHEREAS, on May 12, 2015 and July 14, 2015, at duly noticed public hearings, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission as well as evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council has reviewed and analyzed the proposed project pursuant to the California Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 65000 et seq.), the Lake Elsinore General Plan and proposed General Plan Amendment, and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and finds and determines that the proposed Tentative Tract No. 36577 is consistent with the requirements of California Planning and Zoning Law and with the goals and policies of the Lake Elsinore General Plan and proposed General Plan Amendment, proposed Terracina Specific Plan and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. SECTION 2. The City Council has considered Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2014-02 and the Mitigation Measures appertaining thereto. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2014-02 was prepared pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. Appropriate findings were made, and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2014-02 provides the necessary environmental clearance for Tentative Tract No. 36577. SECTION 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 36577 for Finance and Conveyance Purposes have been made as follows: 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvements, is consistent with the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan and proposed General Plan Amendment, and with the proposed Terracina Specific Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). The project is proposed to allow for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development will be permitted as a result of approval of this map. Any future development of the site must be preceded by the final approval process of a Tentative Tract Map for subdivision purposes. 2. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the proposed project will not result in any significant environmental impact. No development will be permitted with the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 36577. The project has been adequately conditioned by all applicable departments and agencies and will not therefore result in any significant environmental impacts. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - _ PAGE 3 OF 4 SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 14th day of July, 2015. Steve Manos, Mayor City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Leibold, City Attorney CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - _ PAGE 4 OF 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SS CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2015-_ was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of July, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk E. tlh;: eL51 h0l�j' Agenda Date: 7/14/2015 In Control: City Council Agenda Number: 8) City of Lake Elsinore Text File File Number: ID# 15-669 Versional 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 w lake-elsinore.org Status: Approval Final File Type: Report City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Printed on 7/9/2015 CITY OF i LADE LSII`IORX `v DREAM EXTREMr- REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRANT M. YATES CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 14, 2015 SUBJECT: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR FY 2015-16 THROUGH 2019- 2020 Recommendation Staff recommends that City Council adopt Resolution 2015 — _ adopting the proposed 5 -year Capital Improvement Plan for fiscal years 2015-16 through 2019-20. Background By direction of the City Council, City staff updates and maintains a Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) in conjunction with the annual budget cycle. Included in the CIP are construction projects, facility improvements, and purchases. Utilizing input from Council, staff and the public, provided at the Budget Study session held on May 26, 2015; various projects were developed and proposed in this Cycle of the CIP. In compliance with Government Code 65401, the Planning Commission reviewed the City's program and found it in conformance with the City's General Plan. CIP Projects have been classified into two types of projects. Construction and Non - Construction CIP, and four categories: Circulation, Facilities, Infrastructure, and Parks. The Construction CIP are projects concerning major infrastructure or specific improvement projects. The Non -Construction CIP are major purchases by the City or recurring street improvements, studies, plans, or equipment (i.e., annual slurry seal, traffic lights, IT/Computer implementations, etc.). Discussion This CIP budget document was developed by incorporating input from the City Council and key management team members, based on community comments and feedback received throughout the year. This team then, through several internal workshops, identified and evaluated community needs in the areas of roads/streets, bridges, public buildings, parks and recreation facilities projects. Each proposed project was reviewed Capital Improvement Plan for FY 2015-16 through FY2019-20 July 14, 2015 Page 2 and discussed to ensure funding, timing, and necessity were appropriately addressed. An Operating Budget and CIP Budget workshop was held on May 26, 2015. This workshop provided the City Council with an overview of the major projects, and to receive public comments concerning the five-year program. All projects were evaluated by to ensure consistency with the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, while considering the City's long-term vision as developed by the City Council. The Planning Commission also considered the proposed CIP projects and adopted the attached Resolution finding consistency with the City's General Plan. Projects in this document have been scheduled in each of the five fiscal years based on community needs, as determined by the City Council and availability of funding. Additionally, since many projects in the CIP are conceptual in nature, the general outline for cost estimates provided in last year's CIP document was revised and utilized as shown on the Parameters for CIP Budget Cost page. The fiscal years 2016-20 CIP identifies a total of 99 projects consisting of 41 Circulation Projects totaling $25,078,125; 17 Facilities Projects totaling $25,605,340; 17 Infrastructure Projects totaling $9,051,825; and 24 Park Projects totaling $16,681,274. The total cost to complete all of the proposed projects is $76,416,564, of which $47,231,108 is programmed for FY 2015-16. Also of note, in this document, there are over $29.1 million in projects with unspecified funding sources. These projects have been identified as necessary infrastructure for the City, and will require that funding sources be identified before the projects can commence. Inclusion of those with funding still needed in the document assists staff with seeking grants and negotiating improvements with potential 31d parties. Other key elements to the Capital Improvement Plan are: - Continue improvements fund by the Total Road Improvement Program (T.R.I.P. Measure A Sales Tax Bond) financing to fund Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation and other Street related capital projects. ($5,144,728) - Camino Del Norte Street Improvements ($3,000,000) - Rosetta Canyon Park Improvements ($7,123,871) - Serenity Park Improvements ($1,017,800) - Central Avenue Drainage Improvements ($3,138,879) - Whisker's Fishing Beach Improvements ($420,000) - Several Interchange Projects, Traffic Signals, and other improvements are listed in more detail within the attached CIP document. Fiscal Impact The Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Year 2015-16 through 2019-20 includes improvements throughout the City. Total capital improvement plan cost is $76,416,564 with $47,231,108 in funding identified. Funding sources include, but are not limited to, development fees from TIF and Area Drainage; grants including CDBG, Measure -A and Gas Tax, and assessment districts for specific project areas. Capital Improvement Plan for FY 2015-16 through FY2019-20 July 14, 2015 Page 3 Prepared by: Jason Simpson Director of Administrative Services Approved by: Grant M. Yates City Manager Attachment: City Council Resolution No. 2015-_ FY2016-2020 Capital Improvement Plan - Project Summary by Type of Project RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS 2015-16 THROUGH 2019-20. WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore annually adopts and updates a long-range program of proposed capital improvement projects with single and multiple -year capital expenditures to guide the planning, scheduling and budgeting of capital improvement projects during the next five-year period; and WHEREAS, staff has prepared a proposed Capital Improvement Plan ("CIP") for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 which includes appropriations for each capital improvement project presented in the budget, with some projects spanning multiple fiscal years; and WHEREAS, on May 26, 2015 the City Council held a study session on the proposed budget for Fiscal Years 2015-16; and WHEREAS, the May 26, 2015 study session included discussions about the 2015- 16 to 2019-20 CIP; and WHEREAS, the proposed CIP for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 was submitted to the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission at its regularly scheduled public meeting of June 16, 2015; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 65401, the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission, by PC Resolution 2014-_, made a finding that CIP for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 conforms to the Lake Elsinore General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has caused to be transmitted to the City Council a copy of its report and resolution finding that the CIP for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 conforms to the Lake Elsinore General Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed CIP for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 was submitted to the City Council at a noticed public hearing on July 14, 2015; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered testimony and evidence presented at the public hearing on July 14, 2015, and reviewed the proposed CIP for Fiscal Years 2015- 16 through 2019-20 in light of all information presented. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - Page 2 of 4 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council confirms and accepts the finding of the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission that the CIP for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 conforms to the Lake Elsinore General Plan. SECTION 2. The City Council finds that the CIP for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 demonstrates the efficient appropriation of public funds relating to the implementation of capital improvement projects anticipated to be undertaken throughout the City over the course of the ensuing five years. The City Council further finds that the CIP is a governmental fiscal activity which does not involve a commitment to a specific project that may result in potentially significant impacts on the environment and that the adoption of the CIP is not a "project' within the meaning of CEQA. Individual projects developed pursuant to the CIP will be subject to CEQA. SECTION 3. The CIP for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 is hereby approved and adopted. A copy of the CIP for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 hereby adopted and certified by the City Clerk, shall be filed with the City Manager or a designated representative, and a further copy so certified shall be placed and shall remain on file in the Office of the City Clerk where it shall be available for inspection. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14h day of July, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Steve Manos, Mayor City of Lake Elsinore CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - Page 3 of 4 ATTEST: Virginia Bloom, City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Zeid Leibold, City Attorney City of Lake Elsinore CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - Page 4 of 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA } SS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE JJ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE I, VIRGINIA J. BLOOM, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2015-_ was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of July, 2015 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Virginia J. Bloom, CMC City Clerk 'IF Im: j :P£ 'E Z:m'. =iqz; :=ZImi F:n€ ':0 ➢ 0-�IQ P P°�.3 C -O n ntc-.� r-^!DIDID IZ rlgiCC .D 3.q=IZ.�-� 1Z m- N P: Z C.m Z € TIpjF z C m Zlp Z - -I niK jO'�iA jOl�k�l 7-Q_G m-lntNlN -T i€07€Alp N -.DIF IFIWiy1T ;CI1r=Z,v :-Di>�r .Z ED.�€E� Z-ziz.m.rn'-1!Z nlmt�Ev!Gi.�v'�€Bly€rt'f ZS jR�!OsC i �!q!O 28:7K'!nvlx=0!O 'r. m O=r"e>'P £m Em!L]€m.Z,Z; I 'P'z KIK'mni��C,J=zmDIZ:C:v,lln'v,I^'�iZ 9_�Em iv,:zZ=�ZImiOm '€v€ £�j0' G-'1-Zls ;y y;n€D€°.rOl,p'D 2ltil v1Ci `�I�;mlm ziZ m P zlO:r=r g73 N:m y: aim'€-zi_Dm o_noo{ni�`➢ o mlm£m!D10[ti� zlm:z,zfnni--zlz'zl °moi .➢'D,S _�_ b:b: yy;v: '-�i1Z: imi -`a m:x Mme mlmlV'm'�'mi�v,:niO: °i ! £z� �Z Z mjr!4 € ic'.b :PO R p 0 F io Ix m m cl�,..z v13z:v x z b �€ iO:D -➢ iN a- -ni D- - 2r;A :` i.o:,,:➢: €v= §�; !Z Z: 3 I A, I 0` loj{cvl �. IV�IIxDj i N!Nt-1 !Zi i'l I icily€pi A im: t ',r q=ai_1 °b�yve D= i - 'a:ml lz iicwl I I EP! lyl �O1 ! l 'Z£ n albla q a_➢q: zzzzzzz£z!: C C C C C C=C:C nn-Vin➢➢➢=n: 1 Fvp- n.� L vjpin Z-Sn:CIF,. £ C D � O G; � 1 gy=m m �In:vix; bI3 €0 1 z:r^tmlmnlO l�jm ZIi�DI1-piz >RP€p,Z; !A€D z'3in� i i A:F:F�F:F'FtF?Fi'�=F'F!FiF iFfFF€Fom 3FF�F €F EF�F.F[F'.F FiF :F:F:F,F:F F:F,F:FF3F!FIF £o -o loicio -'- Cc c c°c c?cc c€c c°c cfcc€c c£cicc c c€ccicic cicic c�c c cic lo:p,o o,o o'o !o N 010 100 0 0 00 0 0;0 o p o;o O O O O O p:0 O O=p p o p O;p Op Z;Z z-Z=ZIZIZ€ZIc!zlzz.;z ziz z;Z z z z z z z z z z Z Z z Z.z z z -z z z -Z zlz z,.z £ I Iml I i- i I tn� � NN:N N=rnly N-tnl V, �[n-ln !tr•-•y-tIHi-1:-1-rn iv,l v,;in -i N€v,'in to -v:: v: �-rn v,l-V+-v,;v,iln lv+E vs -I-F F-� -li-� -I- :b '--I--i -1;1 -ll-i FeF F F3F 1f1:11P F 11111 11 J3-� x.041 ii1!1[� .F�D.n:F.F:]]:F PA:FD:D eF:F.A ;F eA.D;A,FF F;F1FeA:F;F +minis !�mm!mj�!xmm;m'm im im£rIT rITErmim�m?n'mnrmmlm!TimTmmn il'T+,if+m":lmEm%mim -rn'n!m €-I-imics i In€nlnni€i 3 G)0' i�i�€�1�� v z to vsv:v: :piv; ZIZi F€AIPi �;FIP IP'P€P A IZfz`Z tz'z!AIA.P'P-,z_Z PIPjPiAP o a b 0010 C '0 W O O l�I��� �i� �l� oi�_o;c p n:o nEo q- o,➢ �;o;m m;O € lm: i im:m ;rn mlmjm;--- m mIm m mimFm'mim Z m z!z Z m z Z;m 3: R- �.31�° : €3!3'3!€�:�:�=��1�!� D�m n n 31b1➢:� miv v- m! i v!viviaiv v.z :m im'mEm :m 'Z lz'z.m Z Zjm 'Zv 0P. 1 iC)C)4-I€ZI 1 -4 -4 �O C n-IZ'; T- ZIh TRT A 1 I 3�?3N_Fn-i--�F:0OF[-€II�Fm--liOFm -Fm-;,�Fmn-I j O :z2`Z;2;inM:n; ;0 0'O; OOO Oi00 °0 'Dm =nnQm.q€nM- m€� n!nIn'n nini n I _ aep i = - - - - ! I IZIZ;Z'.2-Z z:Z ➢€qID D'bib glDinlD DiD D=D D=D D Q Im CmC lCmC lm€m !mmmimmlm=Cm lm jm'mmlm`m!m.m€m€mim€mEK£CiKiKK€CiK!K'Z'ZI Z'IZ'ZtZIz`ZZ n IG €C; �i�£�'�i �E :ECiCiC=.CiCEC !C 1 CiC;D➢€➢€➢;�'_�i➢e➢`r➢- - £W-W€W:W:W:[u:tu-b-b- Q:QiQ ,Q£Q:Q :Q I'!EII�IIt !I€iIl(jl€€I 1€EI -W_ - V o 00 'J-ln O O O In P P 0 4 P W - A O -N W _O Vl O -O V€-mIW Q, O a O+ O lD V, -J _O lJ1 N -W -N O Y - pp- ! j i 3 3 1 1 I 1 i F I i I i € I-4[�ii� I` I r CL o • e n w is y � N 4 i 9 4 N 6 w 9 01 C 0s b p w l a C c � m m z z j m z a : a m L) O 'eDo m z € P N N m = uNNi a -y 00 J C ,n en a GJl ppp cni � A to V G� ' 4 00 O 1" r o -i m A N ID G rn rn O Ln N W r T O Z D N A 00 1.fl € N c A n N J Z O W W C C a g p A o m JO O N O N O O J O •' D rn to � N T O m Z v 1g1 $ g w�2 O N D] z SJE 1 JD o N C oo v_ m w ms 0�3 o c n s N Q T Z � o g W W O A Z D a 00 V G Z ate' ID" a 0 ' C'� +� z v W U N c € I I i I ji�l 1 4 II IIIIII• I I i i 2 i j i 3 3 1 1 I 1 i F I i I i € I-4[�ii� I` I r CL o • e n w is y � N 4 i 9 4 N 6 w 9 01 C 0s b p w l a C c � m m z z j m z a : a m L) O 'eDo m z € P N N m = uNNi a -y 00 J C ,n en a GJl ppp cni � A to V G� ' 4 00 O 1" r o -i m A N ID G rn rn O Ln N W r T O Z D N A 00 1.fl € N c A n N J Z O W W C C a g p A o m JO O N O N O O J O •' D rn to � N T O m Z v 1g1 $ g w�2 O N D] z SJE 1 JD o N C oo v_ m w ms 0�3 o c n s N Q T Z � o g W W O A Z D a 00 V G Z ate' ID" a 0 ' C'� +� z v W U N c € I I i I ji�l 1 4 II I � I#jl��l!ili l3 ! Ilj��i ,Ili�: j' �' 1 4 Ill .0 0''- - i0 €0'1010? 10 O i ?Q3 j{O F. 12 I i j! I i E ij j! I I j i 3 3 1 1 I 1 i F I i I i € I-4[�ii� I` I r CL o • e n w is y � N 4 i 9 4 N 6 w 9 01 C 0s b p w l a C c � m m z z j m z a : a m L) O 'eDo m z € P N N m = uNNi a -y 00 J C ,n en a GJl ppp cni � A to V G� ' 4 00 O 1" r o -i m A N ID G rn rn O Ln N W r T O Z D N A 00 1.fl € N c A n N J Z O W W C C a g p A o m JO O N O N O O J O •' D rn to � N T O m Z v 1g1 $ g w�2 O N D] z SJE 1 JD o N C oo v_ m w ms 0�3 o c n s N Q T Z � o g W W O A Z D a 00 V G Z ate' ID" a 0 ' C'� +� z v W U N c isv'enn!n—!-e—`�€n_i^=m:ti Wlti=nA€�Sp:'-Wj� €!m IGZ1!G�`A n-�E�2 D-➢:T'_Z rnr :iq -"nl �Iv zm-vizI�I7Zc m-3 G1 -L1: G1 .`210n mai-clip cO=Z[C!�IA=Q:n=n�iiZ'D;Z n2;;.;i�w=zip=m:z!-Iln:ti:^TE�;Q"`-a•r=r :r-A�jl�i`ni�ln Z F;nR€,n„-'D:m!Af{€m:m�zfz�fwigm :9iA'Z;z i.'n `ry €mH Z i3']Acfn:z��fmmO:n y: ;b:moi oirDi`Am) it ApbNiAr;n 'ZlZIZ! !rC•• m€i:xl,A„F0I�f� b Min '�€p•°�I�nA���Z:zI21zDr z�2 °' ZA -z -C: .22;w'gq.Ai.n ZEZ 10-�i��G ,D -Rn _ Q O Ai pzi n€ ? ! !m�� n.�'n. I in42,a f R.:p ;piOs A' ➢: imx :mEZ�QZ€AEy`�lri 2� 6a A _gl M21 FC:—I I➢i L �I �ni N V€ - a - pOp pW-N-N-W'e pW '.y-01:1 m J:� � S-OVt O -O -S :pO O-0`aOtWD ppp €A�.S _1 N € w -S 0=t Rv€ O'W Z`zl nfnlninin'-ninin`jn!nnin€n �AlAA IA:A �31iAAlAiAf.'0 !AA rCrCCrCr frCrCSG€rCr rCr C 12 212 :y€yly `yi�l�:pi9F�!A`D'A:P zZmz:z°O O O;O';OiO?Q'O O p i!!Z:ZiZiZi2€Z:'ziz €2:z '.A,nlq :A,A J]�A:A;n. .AiAiz m;mimem€—=m ',vsGi'Gly=v�iv'v L1`D�mq Z IZim, A:AfA l:O tz€z,�IKlZ n n:>:o 00 ;O IOiy " CEr;r; C: Ci C:<€G€r;m :<rnam Im;m:mpm:m:—:z€mz:Z =v!vim;m�m!m€mv;Zs EZ ',Z:AA€Z?ZZ:Z:ZiAn!2 iz€n n;nln!r MEa:z n€n=nr3 CiCiC!C 0,010K7Z!Z=c HjH H£ m€msm!n w!wtw€_ K€C �inFD, A!2FZ'7 o:ww'C m:Z€Z in Z; €rz, z m'n zln-n�� S N;O eI ;W nn z'Z z?z Iti=c n€n b 3 tQ 4 � � z ry ro � c n � 4 b 54 C c c nxx e' -•to H °p a n cn o w 41 , 41 H N Q 41 "fir J N Ih T G F+ Fir A S S a N C � Z in w N T w w c e nN� m o ; 4 Z w yo ti u A _3 N v z V ■ m a o O O 1 u co K N W C m o e i n r Z H b ID r .. w ➢ $ A b N ih u Q N � � u oV N O O 17 4M V V v o � ops u u NG1N !A W pAW tWp p� V0 Q W e p S W � N � � 3 z A r a C C C z vs u b W W O O W W w N � W A F N N D � � m N N V� p O N V T IIEE I = EIS zln n'nln m n':O Nla:m p ➢ ➢!. O -O :sZ .p =r nZZiZiz'Z � n ! p - D<-p'.b-$ rD-I-GC-C-CiC sD: m- z=c:c:0i�:z.0-D:D ➢,DlD M iz'. £fliiAO ➢iii -=r_': r: -b; D:n =p 0 G5 n. is-o-A_m ,D. n€ =n _-i-Z; =n=O:N:N:m=m: -� €Zae pev; li�"ze Z' A_ m -D .0. y m i L �``p-A C. *� ip' :v: g 3yj Im i,p :S ;➢i ZiN' �2 c i �:NI o I ! _ i SAI ➢ - � 'mi In.a£n'nlni➢iDi➢;➢ ➢➢➢;n:a:n8n'sn !n;hfn�nln;n;n:_n:n€nin:n,n_nin_nl0 m8m'm [NN=., NIN IN;N�N!l/i'N'N'N[+1;N=N:N;N kI/1 k -N -C:C: W m'Q1 W -m m N'h-m m tp m z[Zkziz€z:z_�;v��i�z3 ei c�n amici ; Z:Zz z to €bib6DF NI = C D R E 'O 7 H �I n 'z=2:212 ZI Z zI Z Z=Z;z€z_az=nA:Z W N� ,0 amts `C . `�=�i Oio;c O OiO C 0.i w „ o 'p' . . C I E O� Ij T Cc, ;N;pp N;W' 'ym c w G N {pu O i'V�tm �A pbp �O:VppI �m O _ONa :--IwO:Nq i0Vo0 tl1. SS t�+t:4 g�G'SS p0p 0=p0VV 'N!pMpipOpia0 Wlmia iO O�P�O �G€43pimis Im;0 ipilNp o N m � iiii II i i _ VI EG =V110: - ;0;0' e0e I, - � � T C ae c — " CD - -N N Ni N A a o T 0 m � a G I N N Y jii1[ V I E k E£ k N T .ff 1 Oa A N 1p p F i i° r w in a r p y, w c CrIIXI n o } _ _ E S I I€ U U T Z o m V V wI Z a i € 1 I I, � � f� � I, i i 3, 1• I, i I F � I W O W , Z IC � O tz C GI Ft, �Rl 0 Dh IgM4 z tz g;c! Igc X' 1 Iz- rm zi is [91 :0 m 0 o IZ zA-.c7!=;O 'Z i' If > 13 O rm m! zl ID! Cot 1Z.5. R. =1 ME tot w zi is [91 :0 'Z i' 13 O zl ID! Cot m< I Z z z I>;> I> .-4.- r) r) r) n r) M z Z E- C-. C: CZ,) Z,Z:z CI!U io Z!z G) n CL Z4 Z4 6- I CL L) to C, M fl Q . . . . C) CO 2 2, In c:,: os r i0o C3 C C z Z z O.o 0 0 I, Z�4 Rl! 1.1, w -W ib I ::t � , 5 0 z f� jwi-i PC yZ C z rp z z Oil 8 VI 8 Ch z 12 Z 'a 'm A '0 Ir. 4. z Om Z z a > z C7 C3 C z 8 S N Cft w z 0 z "t sm O KI z'EE Z z =I . m al i .,a: *909! - � W Chi f WM �84§ Ho §59; 'Z Vi C. � � m IC : W OCO z I 121! Zi i in !C:C- �cz=.C: z Z z n.(), L > Fm i zz. !Z; 4i CO O Z IQ" Q 27 in EL z !z z z iz: w 74 O1 m 6) Z In 1c: z 0 41 oo Zo r a Q n. iA po w i z mz ID 61 W vii is Q w 4pl i .,a: *909! - � W Chi f WM �84§ Ho §59; 'Z Vi C. � � m IC : W OCO z!�'I Otvl Ppb' X10" O€p'. y`VI G iGZ1 "0 0 nIC'. (1a AiZO'. m . m! v; P' - n�n!n !PSP MR SJ:mFm !1/�€IAsy lln=ln=_N=fin =tn �VI�N � �Oi010�6 ;00.0:0 .p°Oa C iC:CiC:C :C€C_CFCC'- .m;mlm�m!m.m-mimm�m'. m:m!mi� ZZiZ�2i2 �Z.Z;zzzl o ti ;z z=z';z z,z z�z z V D€C?� vf�i �ti R°iG1 �m �•=m D minb€� O .i E=2' i� m! !-�1 2 =mm.v v S7 `F EA X° �'rn;mia ;VIS �r =we S EA j l vjv=vsm�v ��o a!nn b�n.n in ,�1JG!JC'JC:X 11 n Y' W T C p n � S C �mx y a v m Z m a Q� W lAR V N A N ry M T w v D H � r a r m = w N z n W N W N O X 0o O G A Z 0� A N LO p N Ih J l4y in v a N 3 C yr v. 3 c z NV O ❑I � '+ C M o cn w w C O Lf A O N m N N � N T Z � lOA'I Zai 0 0 0 o m n 0 Z N Ou�l in C P C � w D C n 5 L�11 O lVil b � m V O V N Y � O O rn rn �m z0 ! N W jp i O OWI � G va v+ n 0 A $ O W O+ G m W O K � Z 9 w N in W W N T Ca m p It cc co 1:01 rin :4 7�5 > Ii AiAIAiA!AIAIA€A roroEvsv co 4 AR—allmi' �3' Z:ZTZ'Z Z Z z H i::i 4 Al to ZEN CL n cl 0 0 0 1 '!z OOio: 010 g�zlz zizjzez X, -m-T M S�im Ch m N N 4 km 0-4 in H C7 ED z co 10 kyr z zT O -A Z4 c C. m w Z .0 in M V �� ,i:l sW'�;w 00; W: m m to 0 C. N O O m M o ry o Z � w ¢ o Z o U o m W v � w E n " m J z C d E r m a v O T U O U m C U U U 0 C 0 C O O N C U U v U U O V U U co U m a c Z w � a N N N N N N ^W W CO m lie M ~ a V o M c Z W mo 0 N N i N N N 01 O i U O N W > C_ > C_ /1 a Cl)a t a LL NO -C O O 0 0 J 0 C_ O Q LL > > Emz0 i d O O Y a � 2 U) a ° cages a a WD C C QJ y LL LL K � 0N N W � > O > > O > O > O N d d U) Q Q Q Q C C C y 0 OO O O c a a aa v v v v v�' o N i ♦J'. W W m 11 J o. a a a 5i L U REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk DATE: July 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the Minutes as submitted. Discussion The following minutes are submitted for approval: a. Regular City Council meeting of June 23, 2015 Prepared by: Diana Giron, Deputy City Clerk Approved and Submitted by: Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk Approved by: Grant Yates, City Manager Attachment: Draft Minutes of June 23, 2015 C47": C?F .17x. LAki E � LSI 110F E Tuesday, June 23, 2015 CALL TO ORDER City of Lake Elsinore Meeting Minutes City Council STEVE MANOS, MAYOR BRIAN TISDALE, MAYOR PRO TEM DARYL HICKMAN, COUNCIL MEMBER ROBERT MAGEE, COUNCIL MEMBER NATASHA JOHNSON, COUNCIL MEMBER GRANT YATES, CITY MANAGER 7:00 PM Mayor Manos called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. ROLL CALL LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE CULTURAL CENTER 183 N. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 PRESENT: Council Member Johnson, Council Member Magee, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale and Mayor Manos ABSENT: Council Member Hickman Also present: City Manager Yates, City Attorney Leibold, and City Clerk Bloom CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Gov't Code § 54957(b)): City Manager CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL --ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Gov't Code Section 54956.9 (2 potential cases) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL --ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Gov't Code Section 54956.9 (1 potential case) Cultural Center City Attorney Leibold announced that the City Council would be meeting in Closed Session to discuss the items identified on the City Council Closed Session. The City Council recessed to Closed Session at 5:01 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Manos reconvened the meeting at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Manos. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Council Member Johnson, Council Member Magee, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, and Mayor Manos ABSENT: Council Member Hickman Also present: City Manager Yates, City Attorney Leibold, City Clerk Bloom, Administrative Services Director Simpson, Community Development Director Taylor, Interim Public Works Director Smith, Community Services Director Skinner, Planning Manager MacHott, Management Analyst Dailey, Police Chief Hollingsworth, Fire Chief Newman, and Deputy City Clerk Giron CLOSED SESSION REPORT City Attorney Leibold announced that the City Council met in Closed Session to discuss: Public Employee Performance Evaluation of the City Manager pursuant to Government Code Section 54957, subdivision (b), paragraph (2); two (2) potential cases of anticipated litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 of subdivision (d), paragraph (2); and one (1) potential case of anticipated litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9, subdivision (d), paragraph (4). City Attorney Leibold stated that no reportable action was taken. PRESENTATIONS / CEREMONIALS ** Recognition of Sheriff Deputy Carl Coats Mayor Manos presented a Certificate of Recognition to Sheriff Deputy Coats. ** Recognition of Sheriff Sergeant Pete Giannakakos Mayor Manos presented a Certificate of Recognition to Deputy Segeant Giannakakos. ** Recognition Declaring July as "Parks & Recreation Month" City of Lake Elsinore Page 2 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 Mayor Manos presented a Proclamation declaring July as "Parks & Recreation Month" to Community Services Director Skinner and Recreation Supervisor Davis. Director Skinner announced the fireworks show and concert on July 4th, free swim night on July 10th and July 24th from 6:00 p.m to 8:00 p.m.; skate park opening; Summer Nights at Rosetta Park on July 10th and Serenity Park on July 24th; free boating days on July 12th and 26th; and Movies at the Park at Summerlake Park on July 1st, 15th, and 29th. Mayor Manos announced an additional presentation regarding Drowning Prevention by Cal Fire. Fire Chief Newman provided a presentation on drowning safety and prevention. He stated that statistically the county is up 30% in drownings and near drowning in fresh water. Cheif Newman reviewed the ABC's of Water Safety and the drowning statistics from January 1st through June 15th, 2015. PUBLIC COMMENTS Teresa Kirpluk, Lake Elsinore resident, asked Council to move forward with the Alberhill Villages project and stated that she is tired of traveling to other cities to fulfill her shopping needs. Pat Kilroy, Lake Elsinore resident, spoke in opposition of eliminating Fire Station #10 services and stated that now is not the time to cut fire protection and paramedic services to the City. Victoria Krier, Lake Elsinore resident, spoke in favor of moving forward with the Alberhill Villages project. Sharon Gallino, Lake Elsinore resident, stated that she attended a community meeting on June 10th with neighbors and Castle Cooke and the attendees were informed that the City was holding up the project from further development. The public was also encouraged to go to the City and express their concerns. Ms. Gallino stated that City Council and staff should have been invited to attend that meeting. Paulie Tehrani, Lake Elsinore resident, thanked the Council for doing a great job in cleaning up the City. Ms. Tehrani also thanked Community Development Director Taylor and the Code Enforcement Divisoin for looking after the City. CONSENT CALENDAR 1) ID# 14-640 Approval of Minutes Attachments: CC Minute Report 6-9-2015 CC Minutes It is recommended that the City Council approve the Minutes as submitted. City of Lake Elsinore Page 3 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 2) ID# 14-641 City Investment Report for May 2015 Attachments, City Investment Staff Report 2015-05 City Investment Report 2015-05 Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Investment Report for May 2015. 3) ID# 14-642 Acquisition of Service Body Fleet Vehicle Attachments: Ar, uisition of Service Body Fleet Vehicle Staff Report Exhibit A - Acauisition of Service Bodv Fleet Vehicle Reauest for Proposal(RFP).doc Exhibit B- Acauisition of Service Bodv Fleet Vehicle - Service Bed Lake Chevrolet Bid Staff recommends the City Council award the purchase of one (1) service body fleet vehicle to be awarded to Lake Chevrolet in the amount of $40,287.18. 4) ID# 14-643 Approval of Professional Services Contract with Carole Donahoe to Provide Specialized Planning Services for Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Attachments: Consultant Services Contract 2015-2016 - Carole Donahoe - CC Staff Report - 6-23-15 Draft Consultant Services Contract 2014-2015 - Carole Donahoe 6-23-15 It is recommended that the City Council Authorize the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Contract with Carole Donahoe for the provision of specialized planning services to the City of Lake Elsinore during Fiscal Year 2015-2016 in an amount not to exceed $50,000 in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. 5) ID# 14-644 Approve designation of Mayor as City Voting Delegate for the 2015 League of California Cities Annual Conference Attachments: Staff report LOCC Voting Delegate LOCC Annual Conference Voting Delegate It is recommended that the City Council approve the Mayor as the City's Voting Delegate for the 2015 League of California Cities Annual Conference to be held September 30 - October 2, 2015 in San Jose. 6) ID# 14-645 Professional Services Agreement between RHA Landscape Architects Planners and the City of Lake Elsinore (Serenity Park Phase II Attachments, Staff Report - RHA Agenda Report 6-23-2015 ATTACHMENT - RHA Proposal -Serenity Park Improvements ATTACHMENT - RHA Schedule of Proposed Fees Costs ATTACHMENT - RHA Professional Services Agreement Staff recommends the City Council approve a Professional Services Agreement by and between RHA Landscape Architects Planners and the City of Lake Elsinore in the amount not to exceed $79,409 for landscape architecture, City of Lake Elsinore Page 4 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 engineering services and reimbursables related to design development and construction documents for Serenity Park Phase II located at 19685 Palomar Road and the adjacent 2.68 acre parcel (APN 370-120.045) and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. 7) ID# 14-646 Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services Attachments: Staff Report Tree Trimming Contractor Services Agmt 2015 It is recommended that the City Council Approve and award the Agreement for Contractor Services to West Coast Arborist in the amount of $85,000 (plus 10 contingency, for a total budget of $93,500) for Annual Citywide Tree Maintenance Services, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form attached and in such form as approved by the City Attorney; and Authorize the City Manager to execute amendments not to exceed 10% contingency, as needed for emergency/extra work. 8) ID# 14-647 Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with HR Green California, Inc. Attachments: Staff Report -Amendment No. 2 HR Green Altachment'A' - HR Green - Amendment No 2 to PSA Attachment'B' - Active List of Land Use Applications Staff recommends the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement for Professional Services with HR Green California, Inc., for engineering, project support, and plan check services in the amount of $242,080, in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. 9) ID# 14-648 Amendment No. 3 to Professional Services Agreement With Sustainable Civil Engineering Services Attachments: Staff Report - Extend SCES PSA - Amendment No. 3 Attachment A - Amendment No. 3 to SCES PSA Staff recommends the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 3 to approve the third year of the Agreement for Professional Services with Sustainable Civil Engineering Services, Inc. (SCES), for project management and plan check services, in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. 10) ID# 14-649 Award Agreement for Professional Services for 1-15/Main Street Interchange Design Services Attachments: Staff Report Main Street 1-15 Design Services PSA PSA with Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions Professional Services 2015 Itis recommended that the City Council Award Agreement for Professional Services to Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions for the Design of the 1-15/Main Street Interchange Street/Ramp Widening and Traffic Signals; and Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in the amount of $238,668 to Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions, in substantially the form City of Lake Elsinore Page 5 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney. 11) ID# 14-650 Award Construction Contract to L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc. For Whisker's Fishing Beach Improvements - CIP Project No. 4369 Attachments: Staff Re ort - Whisker's Parking Lot Improvement Construction Services Agmt It is recommended that the City Council: A.) Approve and award the Agreement for Public Works Construction to L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc., in the amount of $234,833 for the Whisker's Fishing Beach Improvements Project, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney; and B.) Authorize the City Manager to execute contract change orders not to exceed 15% of the total Agreement, pursuant to requirements set forth in the construction agreement; and C.) Authorize the Director of Public Works to record the Notice of Completion once it is determined the work is complete and the improvements are accepted. City Clerk Bloom announced two speakers on Agenda Item No. 12, therefore pulling this item from the Consent Calendar. Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, to approve the Consent Calendar, less Agenda Item No. 12, passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Magee, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: Council Member Hickman ABSTAIN: None AGENDA ITEM(S) PULLED 12) ID# 14-651 Agreement For Operational Management of La Laguna Resort And Boat Launch Between Williams Bait & Tackle. Inc. And City of Lake Elsinore Attachments: Staff Report -- La Laguna Operations Agreement 061715 ATTACHMENT - La Laguna Operations Agreement 061715 Final It is recommended that the City Council Approve the Agreement for Operational Management of La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch with Williams Bait & Tackle, Inc. in the form attached and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement, subject to any minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney. City of Lake Elsinore Page 6 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 Community Services Director Skinner provided an overview of the staff report and recommendations. Director Skinner explained the temporary operations of La Laguna Resort and revisions to the agreement; William's Bait & Tackle, Inc. responsibilities of day to day maintenance and staffing; and the City's responsibilities of the larger maintenance tasks. Pat Kilroy, Lake Elsinore resident, spoke in opposition of the operational agreement between the City and William's Bait & Tackle, Inc. and expressed his concerns regarding the agreement process. Mr. Kilroy also questioned the 14 hours of operation that was stipulated in the agreement and stated that the facility is opened 24 hours. Kim Cousins stated that for the past 18 months the the Lake Elsinore Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors has encouraged the City to take over operations of La Laguna Resort. Mr. Cousins also stated that little has been accomplished to raise the standards at the campground by the previous operator. He spoke in favor of William Johnson as an ambassador for the City and La Laguna Resort. Council Member Magee stated William Johnson is the right person for the campground facility. He stated that he had to wait in line at the gate on both occasions that he visited the campground because people were checking -in. Council Member Magee believes that Mr. Johnson will change the atmosphere with his attitude and entrepreneurial spirit. Motion by Council Member Magee, second by Council Member Johnson, to approve the agreement for operational management of La Laguna Resort and Boat Launch with William's Bait & Tackle, Inc. in the form and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement, subject to any minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney, passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Council Member Magee, Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: Council Member Hickman ABSTAIN: None PUBLIC HEARING(S) 13) ID# 14-652 Specific Plan Amendment No. 2014-02 & Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 - A Request for Approval of Amendments to Previously Approved The Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan and Approval of Building Designs for 163 Detached Condominiums and Related Improvements City o/Lake Elsinore Page 7 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 Attachments: SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - CC Staff Report 6-23-15 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - Vicinity Map 6-23-15 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - Aerial Map 6-23-15 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - CC Resolutions and Ordinances 6-23-15 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 20147-07- The Village at Lakeshore - Amended Specific Plan 6-23-15 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - AMND 6-23-16 SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - PC Staff Report 4-21-15 - 6-23-15 _ - SPA 2014-02 & RDR 2014-07 - The Village at Lakeshore - PC Staff Report 5-5-15 - 6-23-15 The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following action: A.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015.058 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Regarding Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 2005-01 and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 Adopting Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration 2006-05. B.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-059 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Adopting Findings that Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 2005-01 and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 are Consistent with the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. C.) Introduce by title only and waive further reading of ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1341 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE VILLAGES AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN. D.) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-060 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Approving Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 Providing Building Designs for 163 Detached Single -Family Condominium Dwelling Units and Related Improvements. Mayor Manos opened the Public Hearing at 7:33 p.m. Planning Manager MacHott provided an overview of the staff report and recommendations to Council. Manager MacHott explained the Village at Lakeshore Specific Plan was approved in 2006 with 146 detached single-family units and the proposed project is for 163 single-family condominium residences. He reviewed the recreational amenities and architectural styles. City of Lake Elsinore Page 8 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 Nancy Huntzinger, county resident, stated that she is in support of the project however asked how many traffic signal lights will be installed to support this project and expressed her concerns regarding additional traffic. Planning Manager MacHott responded the proposed project is conditioned to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive and required to include a deceleration lane leading into its entrance to slow vehicles down before pulling in. Mayor Manos asked if Caltrans has reviewed the installation of the traffic signal. Manager MacHott responded that Caltrans has reviewed the initial traffic study and has cleared the construction plans for the state highway. Sharon Gallino, resident asked how the swimming pool will be filled during a drought. Community Development Director Taylor responded staff met with EVMWD and discussed swimming pools, a moratorium, and will serve letters for developments. EVMWD has advised that this year there is enough water for all the projects and will not initiate a moratorium on swimming pools. Chris Hyland, Lake Elsinore resident, spoke in favor of the proposed project and her traffic concerns for child safety. There being no further public comments, Mayor Manos closed the Public Hearing at 7:43 p.m. Council Member Magee thanked staff and the developer for bringing forward the improved design with detached units as opposed to attached units and improved architecture. He stated that he has concerns about parking and stressed that the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions need to include a limitation or prohibition on RV parking and storage, since there will not be an onsite storage lot. Council Member Magee stated that he wanted to add, "No Parking" signs on Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive to Condition No. 77. He also added "No more than 20 units may be permitted before the signal is energized" to Conditon No. 103. Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, to adopt Resolution No. 2015-058 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsiore, California, Regarding Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 2005-01 and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 Adopting Addendum #1 to Mitigated Negative Declaration 2006-05, passed by unanimous vote as follow: AYES Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Magee, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: Council Member Hickman ABSTAIN: None City of Lake Elsinore Page 9 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, to adopt Resolution No. 2015-059 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Adopting Findings that Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 2005-01 and Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 are Consistent with the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, passed by unanimous vote as follow: AYES Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Magee, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: Council Member Hickman ABSTAIN: None Motion by Council Member Johnson, second by Council Member Magee, to waive further reading and introduce by title only Ordinance No. 2015-1341 with the addition to Conditon No. 77 of no RV parking and that no parking signs shall be installed along the frontages of Grand Avenue and Riverside Drive and the addition to Condition No. 103 of no more than 20 units may be permitted before the traffic signal is energized. City Clerk Bloom read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 2015-1341 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE VILLAGES AT LAKESHORE SPECIFIC PLAN, passed by unanimous roll -call vote as follows: AYES Council Member Johnson, Council Member Magee, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: Council Member Hickman ABSTAIN: None Motion Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, second by Council Member Johnson, to adopt Resolution No. 2015-060 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Approving Residential Design Review No. 2014-07 Providing Building Designs for 163 Detached Single -Family Condominium Dwelling Units and Related Improvements, as amended, passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Council Member Johnson, Council Member Magee, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: Council Member Hickman ABSTAIN: None APPEAL(S) - None City of Lake Elsinore Page 10 City Council Meeting Minutes BUSINESS ITEM(S) 14) ID# 14-653 Professional Services Agreement with Development Management Group, Inc. (DMG Economics) for Provision of Economic Development Services Attachments: Staff Report - 7-14-2015 dma FINAL DMG INC Professional Services Agreement 7-1-2015 DMGCorporate Profile0615 June 23, 2015 Authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Development Management Group, Inc. to provide economic development professional services to the City of Lake Elsinore for the period of FY 2015/2016 through FY 2 01 712 01 8. City Manager Yates stated the City Council discussed the need for an Economic Development specialist on the City's team during the budget process. He introduced Economic Development Specialist Michael Bracken who has been working on special City projects for over a year. Michael Bracken, Managing Partner of DMG Economics provided a history of the firm's background and services they provide in both the public and private sectors. Mr. Bracken reviewed the proposed three (3) year agreement and stated that it is important for an agreement to be in place so that the City can market to brokers and developers. The agreement will generate an economic strategic plan for the next 5 to 10 years, work with a formalized business recruitment, serve as project ombudsman for larger projects, and provide economic development training to the community, elected and appointed officials, staff and law enforcement. Kim Cousins, President of the Lake Elsinore Valley Chamber of Commerce, stated that Mr. Bracken has opened some amazing opportunities over the past years and looked forward to the development of a strategy to make Lake Elsinore a progressive City. Council Member Johnson thanked Kim Cousins, CEO President of the Chamber of Commerce, for his comments because for a long time the economic development efforts of the City have been primarily from the Chamber of Commerce and the City appreciates that. She stated that it is a great compliment for the chamber of commerce to work in partnership with the City. Mayor Manos stated Mr. Bracken is very intelligent in marketing the City and in communicating with retailers who are considering Lake Elsinore. The City could use that caliber of service. Mayor Manos stated he is in favor of the agreement. City of Lake Elsinore Page 11 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 Council Member Magee stated the City is in a better financial position than it was 5 years ago, because it has been conservative with its projections and has created a savings account. If the City is going to keep up with the pace of rising public safety costs, and the needs and expectations of the community, it needs to invest significantly in its economic development. He stated that he does not know why the Environment Impact Report is not being released. Council Member Magee stated that he is in support of the proposed aqreement. Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale stated that he is in support of his colleagues and is in support of this item. Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, second by Mayor Manos, to authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Development Management Group, Inc. to provide economic development professional services to the City of Lake Elsinore for the period of FY 2015/2016 through FY 2017/2018, passed by unanimous vote as follows: AYES Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, Mayor Manos, Council Member Johnson, and Council Member Magee NOES None ABSENT: Council Member Hickman ABSTAIN: None 15) ID# 14-654 _City of Lake Elsinore 2015 Legislative Platform and Resolution No. 2015-061 Adopting City Council Policy No. 400-13 "Legislative Program Policy and Procedures" Attachments: Staff report Legislative Platform - 3 revised Reso on Legislative Program and Polic revised 3 Lep i slative Platform F i na 12 Council Policy No 400-13 Legislative Platform and Program Policy 2 revised It is recommended that the City Council: A.) Approve and adopt the City of Lake Elsinore 2015 Legislative Platform; and B.) Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2015-061 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Adopting City Council Policy No. 400-13 "Legislative Program Policy and Procedures" Mayor Manos stated that he is the City's representative for the California League of Cities and the Director for the Riverside County's League of Cities Board. He provided an overview of the staff report and recommendations to Council. The City does not currently have a legislative platform, therefore staff has created procedures for a legislative platform that would allow the Mayor to write letters of "Support" or "Opposition" on behalf of the City to its legislative representatives. The legislative platform would also allow for the designation of an Alternative Member and certain legislative items to be reviewed and discussed by Council before a letter is written. Mayor Manos thanked City Attorney Leibold and City Clerk Bloom for their work. City o/ Lake Elsinore Page 12 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 Council Member Magee inquired regarding the lengthy list of policy statements. Mayor Manos responded that the list is a template provided by California League of Cities. Council Member Manos stated that he was impressed with the items on the list and the reoccurring theme of "Support Legislation" and "Funding for Local Government." Council Member Magee stated that he is in support of the item and complemented Mayor Manos. Motion by Council Member Magee, second by Council Member Johnson, to approve and adopt the City of Lake Elsinore 2015 Legislative Platform; and approve and adopt Resolution No. 2015-061 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, Adopting City Council Policy No. 400-13 "Legislative Program Policy and Procedures," passed by unanimous vote as follow: AYES Council Member Magee, Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale, and Mayor Manos NOES None ABSENT: Council Member Hickman ABSTAIN: None PUBLIC COMMENTS Pat Kilroy, Lake Elsinore resident spoke in opposition of the City's budget cut to terminate the contract with Cal -Fire for Fire Station #10 and explained the negative impacts the City will have as a result of unfunding the fire station. Mr. Kilroy pointed out that this item was not presented to the Public Safety Advisory Commission and requested that the City Council look elsewhere to cut the budget and restore funding to Fire Station #10. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS 16) TMP -938 City Departmental Monthly Reports Attachments: Monthly Reports ** Update on Designated Swimming Areas ** 4th of July Fireworks Management Analyst Dailey provided an update of the swimming ordinance amendments and reviewed the key tasks to allow swimming in designated areas on the lake. She stated the ordinance would become effective on June 25, 2015. The City is currently focusing on Elm Grove swimming area and the second swimming area will be located at La Laguna. Staff anticipates the opening of the swimming areas by the July 4th or the following weekend. Analyst Dailey stated staff is working with the Public Safety Advisory Commission and moving forward with the lake use ordinance amendments. City of Lake Elsinore Page 13 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 Community Services Director Skinner provided an overview of the areas that will be impacted by the various events on the 4th of July. Director Skinner announced the concert at Lakepoint Park, the Storm baseball game at the Diamond Stadium, and the Fireworks Spectacular at the lake. He reviewed the schedules, layouts and traffic plan of the events. The Parks and Recreation staff and Public Works staff will also be on hand to ensure safety. Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale asked Director Skinner regarding the aquatic program that is offered. Director Skinner responded that a swimming program will be offered at Lakeside High School from 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. The children are rated on their swimming levels and are advanced in the swimming program as their swimming skills improve. CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS - None CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Council Member Johnson stated that she had the opportunity to observe a DUI checkpoint and was impressed with the law enforcement team's professionalism and thanked them for keeping the City safe. Council Member Johnson congratulated Sergeant Giannakakos and Deputy Coats on their recognition. She reminded the public to be patient and safe on the 4th of July. Council Member Magee announced that on June 22nd the Budget Committee for the County Transportation Commission voted to allocate $1.3 million in Measure A funds to this community. Those funds come back to the City for its involvement with the TUMF program. He announced that the Arroyo del Toro Channel dedication was held today and that in 2005 there was a flood that caused serious erosion to the cemetery. In 2007, the Cemetery District, Flood Control Commission, State, and County were at odds with one another until Flood Control Commissioner Hyland brought them together to meet and discuss the cemetery matter. After 29 years of an assessment in Zone 3 the first project was completed and thanked Commissioner Hyland for bringing everyone together. Council Member Magee announced the loss Tom Thomas, a true leader in this valley. He said it was a privilege to served and know Tom Thomas and he will be missed. He addressed Mr. Kilroy's statement regarding the contract termination with Cal -Fire and stated that it was incorrect in that it takes a year to terminate a contract with Cal -Fire. Council Member Magee explained the City is negotiating the change in the service level and that process is ongoing. He added that public safety remains a top priority for the Council. Council Member Magee reminded the public that 4th of July is the busiest day of the year for animal control services and to keep their pets safe. He wished everyone a safe and joyous 4th of July weekend. Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale spoke regarding the drownings in the County and stated that the Riverside County Board of Supervisors is taking these drownings seriously. Fire Chief Hawkins, Public Health and Environmental Health are doing their best to prevent drownings. Mayor Pro Tem Tisdale reminded everyone to supervise their children and thanked Fire Cheif Newman for the presentation; he also thanked staff for all their hard work. City of Lake Elsinore Page 14 City Council Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 Mayor Manos stated that he attended the Menifee State of the City and that it is exciting and encouraging to see the progress that City has made. He also attended a meeting held by Studio 395 and stated they are very active in this community and are discussing creating a theater program. He attended the public outreach meeting for the 1-15 Railroad Canyon Road and Franklin Interchange Project and stated that the public in attendance were satisfied with the responses they received. The next public outreach meeting will be held on Monday, July 13th at 6:30 p.m. at the Cultural Center, Mayor Manos addressed comments regarding the service change at Fire Station #10 and stated the change was not a decision that was made lightly and the Council has shown its commitment to provide fire safety. He explained the EIR from Castle and Cooke is a report about how the project affects the City and surrounding communities; the report is being prepared and not available to be released. Mayor Manos stated the City is spending in a deficit this year, because there is an economic opportunity for the City to invest in its future. Council had to make difficult choices with the budget, so that the City could invest in itself. He wished everyone a Happy 4th of July and to be safe. Mayor Manos stated that the meeting would be adjourned in memory of Tom Thomas who was a very joyful and giving person and dedicated to this community. Council Member Johnson announced on June 18th Tom Thomas lost his battle to cancer. Mr. Thomas served on the Lake Elsinore Unified School District Board of Trustees; was the Executive Director of Cops for Kids, past President of the Lake Elsinore Rotary Club, Member of the Baja California Rotary Club, and the pioneer that established live feed for the council meetings in Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake. Council Member Johnson stated that Mr. Thomas was always willing to help anyone in need and is survived by his wife, Dee and son, Matt. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Manos adjourned the meeting in memory of Tom Thomas at 8:44 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting to be held on Tuesday, July 14, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. Steve Manos, Mayor Virginia J. Bloom, City Clerk City of Lake Elsinore Page 15 C;I t'Y c)t r� 77} LA-1'QE k= LS1 R�F REPORT TO SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE TO: Honorable Chair and Members of the Successor Agency FROM: Virginia J. Bloom, Agency Clerk DATE: July 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes Recommendation It is recommended that the Successor Agency approve Minutes as submitted. Discussion The following minutes are submitted for approval: a. Regular Successor Agency meeting of June 23, 2015 Prepared by: Diana Giron Deputy City Clerk Approved and Submitted by: Virginia J. Bloom Agency Clerk Approved by: Grant Yates Executive Director Attachment: Draft Minutes of June 23, 2015 TY pr LOKE _,)LSiTio1]E Tuesday, June 23, 2015 CALL TO ORDER City of Lake Elsinore Meeting Minutes Successor Agency STEVE MANOS, CHAIR BRIAN TISDALE, VICE -CHAIR NATASHA JOHNSON, AGENCY MEMBER DARYL HICKMAN, AGENCY MEMBER ROBERT MAGEE, AGENCY MEMBER GRANT YATES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 7:00 PM Chair Manos called the meeting to order at 8:11 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Agency Member Johnson, Agency Member Magee, Vice Chair Tisdale, and Chair Manos ABSENT: Agency Member Hickman LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE CULTURAL CENTER 183 N. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 Cultural Center Also present: Executive Director Yates, Agency Counsel Leibold, and Agency Clerk Bloom, Administrative Services Simpson, Community Development Director Taylor, Interim Public Works Director Smith, Community Services Director Skinner, Police Chief Hollingsworth, Fire Chief Newman, Planning Manager MacHott, Management Analyst Dailey and Deputy City Clerk Gir6n PUBLIC COMMENTS — None CONSENT CALENDAR 1) ID# 14-638 Approval of Minutes Attachments: SA Staff Rpt Minutes for Approval 6-9-2015 SA Minutes It is recommended that the Successor Agency approve Minutes as submitted. 2) ID# 14-639 Successor Agency Investment Report for May 2015 Attachments: SA RDA Investment Staff Report 2015-05 RDA Investment Report 2015-05 Staff recommends that the Members of the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore receive and file the Investment Report for May 2015. City of Lake Elsinore Page 1 Successor Agency Meeting Minutes June 23, 2015 Motion by Vice Chair Tisdale, second by Agency Member Magee, to approve the Consent Calendar passed by unanimuos vote as follow: AYES Agency Member Johnson, Agency Member Magee, Vice Chair Tisdale, and Chair Manos NQFS Nnna. ABSENT: Agency Member Hickman ABSTAIN: None PUBLIC HEARING(S) - None BUSINESS ITEM(S) - None ADJOURNMENT Chair Manos adjourned the Successor Agency meeting at 8:12 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, July 14, 2015. Steve Manos, Chair Virginia J. Bloom, Agency Clerk City o/ Lake Elsinore Page 2 CITY OF INFRASTRUCTURE LAKE ELSINORE Completed Projects: • Lake Elsinore Veteran's Memorial • Welcome Monument Signs • Survey Ground Monument Preservation Upcoming Projects, 11 • Freeway overhead Signs • Collier Avenue Median improvements {yam 7/14/2015 Rosetta Canyon Park Improvements Nil 110 1\ AK LE EL LAKE SINORE Atliai Sports Cop m! of the Wald "The City of Lake _ Elsinore will be the ultimate lake destination where all can live, work and play, build futures and fulfill dreams." Y ' 4 Dog Park Fencing - McVicker Park Serenity Park Improvements Skate Park I p. CITY OF PARK IMPROVEMENTS LAKE ELSINORE � mlw .Crim Smits 6"dafw Wald Upcoming Projects: • Serenity Park Improvements • Parking, Restroom & HMXTrack • Whisker's Fishing Beach Improvements • Yarborough/City Park (HARP Grant) • Rosetta Canyon Park Improvements 7/14/2015 V i I-15/Main Street Interchange Improvements 1-15/Railroad Canyon Interchange - Phase 1 Camino Del Norte Improvements (Franklin to Main Street) r CITY OF PARKIMPROVEMENTS LAKE ELSINORE 4 AdWWftC NGIofMeWOM Completed Projects: • Machado Park - Play Equipment • Summerlake Park - Play Equipment • Yarborough Park - Play Equipment • Skate Zone at Serenity Park • Dog Park Fencing • Lakepoint Park Electrical Enclos�u - I �iAl 1 AI 111 4t1 7/14/2015 2 11,4101-1 TY of LAKE ELSINORE Armn Span (r� Proposed Capital Improvement Plan July 14, 2015 City Council Public Hearing CITY OF_ CIRCULATION LAKE ELSINORE A[Wn Spw[s fiq�MI of the 3Yq!d Completed Projects: • Downtown - Street Rehabilitation • Citywide Slurry Seal • Main Street Overlay from Sulphur to Heald • Senior Center Sidewalk Improvements [Lakeshore) • Railroad Canyon Road Barriers • Traffic Signal at Canyon Hills/Sage • Traffic Signal at Summerhill /Via Scenics • Traffic Signal Repairs at Casino & Diamond; 7/14/7015 C1.VISION STATEMENT LAKE ELSINORE 4c I, n Sporn Coprrl nRra Wald "The City of Lake Elsinore will he the ultimate lake destination where all can live, work and play, build futures and fulfill dreams." LAKE ELSINORE kfi0nsP"CgWdtbf dd �L — ,hi vl5ini+i•i til i11111/:t1HOPE Upcoming Projects: • Main Street Interchange • Camino Del Norte • 1-I5/Railroad Canyon Interchange - Phase 1 • Street Sign Replacement(so/2ois) 1 CITY LAKE EL £LSINORE Proposed Capital Improvement Plan July 14, 2015 City Council Public Hearing CITY OF�_� CIRCULA'T'ION LAKE ELSINOAE +ctiw+spunr (api?alafthe wind Completed Projects: • Downtown - Street Rehabilitation • Citywide Slurry Sea] • Main Street Overlay from Sulphur to Heald • Senior Center Sidewalk Improvements (Lakeshore) • Railroad Canyon Road Barriers • Traffic Signal at Canyon Hilts/Sage • Traffic Signal at Summerhili /Via Scenica • Traffic Signal Repairs at Casino & Diamond-_f3rjle-- .. 7/14/2015 CITY OFVISION STATEMENT LAKE ELSINORE ` r„!::n S;aa Copfe�arthe Wo+Si "The City of Lake Elsinore will be the ultimate lake destination where all can live, work and play, build futures and fulfill dreams.” CITY OF CIRCULATION LAKE ELSINOAE -� kr+en spam (pp"mrnf IAe WorN Upcoming Projects: • Main Street Interchange • Camino Del Norte • I-1 S/Railroad Canyon Interchange -Phase 1 • Street Sign Replacement (10/2015) 1— _ ll,,;r. 1 I-15/Main Street Interchange Improvements y. 1-15/Railroad Canyon Interchange - Phase 1 10,- _ r Camino Del Norte Improvements [Franklin to Main street) 1 i;ki..L�_,I ii, i1,, f. CITY OF�� PARKIMPROVEMENTS I.An ELSINORE Aftw5pprif(CpR,wgw Hf7rid Completed Projects: • Machado Park - Play Equipment • Summerlake Park - Play Equipment • Yarborough Park - Play Equipment • Skate Zone at Serenity Park • Dog Park Fencing • Lakepoint Park Electrical Encloses 7/14/2015 2 Dog Park Fencing - McVicker Park ,0 , LAKE ELsmom Serenity Park Improvements Skate Park PARK IMPROVEMENTS ArtimSpou (npVdollM NbA� Upcoming Projects: • Serenity Park Improvements • Parking. Restroom&BMX Track • Whisker's Fishing Beach Improvements • Yarborough/City Park (HARP Grant) • Rosetta Canyon Park Improvements �ti 7/14/2015 Whisker's Fishing Beach Improvements CITY TAKE ELEL SINOAE Completed Projects: • Lake Elsinore Veteran's Memorial • Welcome Monument Signs • Survey Ground Monument Preservation Upcoming Projects: • Freeway Overhead Signs • Collier Avenue Median Improvements INFRASTRUCTURE Rosetta Canyon Park Improvements 1 fit ,� CITY Of LAKE ELSINORE \� Aaron Sanm Cnprtd of ine NuAr! "The City of Lake Elsinore will be the ultimate lake destination where all can live, work and play, build futures and fulfill dreams." 7/14/2015 0 D m 0 c 0 z C) m 0 N O O T N D n (D �► r_r o W Q o A)� U3 0 c N 7 G CL 3 M (� °, �o_ � �,�_ ta-(D 3-n°zi M (D C (p �. o p ¢7 Q VI (a_(D �. t O �r (Q O fA w 71 CL °cDc3 V) o C :3v a@ O. Z m C} O N 0m 33n`C N N � M 7 O C n O 3a 7 O (D `� ;M.7o (OD ZF3 O M CD CO ° * —m I rn zrm, 0 �. O (D E h Q ��� o QO(CD D Q 0U) c ((n no M o m Q .am w C O N %° Q v cD TQ m z su fD a @ �' Q m C gocn� r+ a;mm> 3 (D rD (D W - Q0) --o (n 3• r D o 3 v (D m N m a) v (D Q z wO to` : 0 i -n 3' v O a w 6 ((D 7 ori Qo cr � D n cn rr OL Cr CD u,m* CL `°T OCD � h zr TACD A Q :E •V C 1V S (D (n n (D n 0 m p C7 2 C (o m m (Q cD (1) (D go X c cn 0 °Oa)mro �(D mem Q to � e�h c 1 CD CLa v� VJ C7 O 7 r+ n (D �► r_r o W Q o A)� U3 0 c N 7 G CL 3 M (� °, �o_ � �,�_ ta-(D 3-n°zi M (D C (p �. o p ¢7 Q VI (a_(D �. Z O �r (Q O fA w 71 CL °cDc3 V) o C :3v a@ O. Z m C} O N 0m 33n`C N N � M 7 O C n O 3a 7 O (D `� ;M.7o (OD ZF3 O M CD CO ° * —m CD 2 rn zrm, 0 �. O (D E h Q ��� o QO(CD D ::P -n - 0U) c ((n no M o m Q .am w C O N %° Q v cD TQ m Q (D m N n. fD a @ �' Q m C gocn� r+ a;mm> 3 (D rD (D W - Q0) --o (n 3• r D o 3 v (D m N m a) v (D Q z wO to` : 0 -n 3' v O a w 6 ((D 7 ori Qo cr � D n cn rr OL Cr CD u,m* CL `°T OCD � h zr TACD A Q :E •V C 1V S (D (n n (D n 0 m p C7 2 C (o m m (Q cD (1) (D go X c o Q°o -0 0 °Oa)mro �(D mem Q Fes;; MO 0 z 0 0 rn m 0 C m 0 z 0 D :0 m O c 1 m O Z 0 N O O T D a O 0 3 C Q o v� F + O O 3 CL 3 N z Q L°Q(D NCD _,� v c) c o =- (D (D ` � C_% C V � CD °CD D !D N O co a C (D ti m O N Q 3w3 (gyp a C o m n o m s o < N (D O 0 o O OW (D 0(D 3C i ° O N (FD 3 m CD m ii nN cOn-o(D N Q��.n XCD o m _ N Covnv w `*° Lnv ( m ID ? (D mNn S0 D O O m 0(D U = _ = O O E—* O_ (D (D N ( 3 N N W N N N = (D N n N = (D O 3 = W (D (D N tD N (D = Q(D N O t0 N .� O ��IT0 �`o� ° ° .o�� < p o m o m ID 3=dam m LD. r Cf? CD m� a D m o v pm CL m CN D� O �K �C7 n O O C7 N C N (O (D (D N F 9. (D n 01 .O p 0 Oo Z w 0 0 C N CD N N (D O �r CL � J� C✓l C> C) .J `z- _m Al � a d a O 0 3 C Q o v� F + O O 3 CL 3 N z Q L°Q(D NCD _,� v c) c o =- (D (D o• (D (D 3 -n O p ',D O- C_% C N S (p CD °CD D !D N O = N C (D ti m O N Q 3w3 (gyp a C o m n o m s o < (D O 0 o O OW (D 0(D 3C i ° O N (FD 3 m W N m ii nN cOn-o(D N Q��.n XCD o m _ N Covnv w `*° Lnv ( m ID ? (D mNn S0 D O O m 0(D U = _ = O O E—* O_ (D (D N ( 3 N N W N N N = (D N n N = (D O 3 = W (D (D N tD N (D = Q(D N O t0 N .� O ��IT0 �`o� ° ° .o�� < p o m o m ID 3=dam m LD. 0_ n(0n Cf? CD m� a D m o v pm CL m CN D� O �K �C7 n O O C7 N C N (O (D (D N F 9. (D n 01 .O p 0 Oo Z w 0 0 C N CD N N (D O r 0 9 �J m C7 m 0 0 0 a ' CD 7 (D CL o cr-0 �= cc 0 3 � � Ln m W WD - 0 O 0 (D ro a n� N �=O % S(0 (Q � MW ro N O CL z (D CT ( m DQ C�w�.aro a 3 sm n 0v (D N 23 (CD ro r C' :3 =' O (:TD `t c�7 N O ON CD +m C7 (D rn m rn UQ tA 0�030 mN N � o�mm n9roarl C�(n c Orronr:oro U �0w o� ;r � o O a (D (D m rn N C n 7 Q N r Cn 7CC Q7 -r'1 ro o S :Tzr 4) r ro mN . (D3 0 rt k (3D 3(D r<D to �- rn Qv 3 6- m roa m �o°� vI ro 3 -+ (CD M N Mn .^. STI .�+. QI ro 7 2_N 5'MO_ � `� %� O o n 3 2, Ll) _ O � � O N 7 01 mC, 0 � . 0 cs, w f s CD n CL CDCDv ro 0 =r CL* m CL to RD: � ro S 00 +')2 v o c�� �� ro� 1 Tcnrom ro ro 0 00 G PO :3 O ' r 0 z r-C, O ro "- ro ro ro ro 0 � n co 9L�l LA �� � `r' ter• � I �. CD a ' CD 7 (D CL o cr-0 �= cc 0 3 � � Ln m W WD - 0 O 0 (D ro a n� N �=O % S(0 (Q � MW ro N O zy N � O. (D CT ( m DQ C�w�.aro a 3 sm n 0v (D N p1 N O ro r C' :3 =' O (:TD `t c�7 N O ON CD +m C7 (D rn m rn UQ tA 0�030 mN N � o�mm n9roarl C�(n c Orronr:oro U �0w o� ;r � o O a (D (D m rn N C n 7 Q N Cn 7CC Q7 -r'1 ro o S :Tzr 4) r ro mN . (D3 0 rt Sm zr �? (D (D D (3D 3(D r<D (D hm�'ro �- rn Qv 3 6- m roa m �o°� vI ro 3 -+ (CD M N Mn .^. STI .�+. QI ro 7 2_N 5'MO_ � `� %� O o n 3 2, Ll) _ O a 0 0 Z crf�D O N 7 01 mC, 0 � . 0 cs, C�ao CD n CL CDCDv ro 0 =r CL* m CL to RD: � ro S 00 +')2 v o c�� �� ro� 1 Tcnrom ro ro 0 00 G PO :3 O ' r 0 z r-C, O ro "- ro ro ro ro 0 0 0 m X 0 v 0 v1 m 0 C m 0 Z 0 wo D M O c M O Z C-) 71 O N 0 0 N D D �! a O 7 CL O a T D 0 F + to O O O 7 c CL 3 3 N w o. 9 o:QllN O N ED O N M O C On o m O a v 3 o q nID� CM C N _ f0 ,a. s 0 O CD .C-' m CL D y D 0 0 a O a O C 3N N d N Q ? N 0 O v 3 M N U s D<l 03 a p p O a (D O r O v + % O N N 0 M o iOm m v CD C' , � a 0 MM CD o Caw c 00 v rr -vnoa m N qi p /p � O ii (D ma ^�v CD N p N C O d n n< p_ N v C v v C �- S O m N 3 ' n �.om �- O M d N (D N D 3 m p �_ N mCD (DN Q N 3 co (D fD ? O O X. N O' M N W N n N v O N O. O. hp (fl 01).� O v o s cn a •� 3 v. o 0 n o'er o v �o n < `< 0 i m 0 ODD a. O (D O N pO N_ O' N 0 (P fl c C D i n m� 0 0 M O O N O M MfD KN 'in 0 0 O c p m v � c Nco m m mm 00 p SN —n g no 00 Z pr = O N N N N N N N o — CL f N l O 3 3 m 4 v{ Lf v\. CT) D �! a O 7 CL O a T D 0 F + to O O O 7 c CL 3 3 N w o. ry o:QllN O N N O N M O C On o m O a v 3 o q nID� CM C N _ f0 ,a. O 0 CD .C-' 3(3N _— (D O D y D 0 0 a O a O C 3N N d N Q ? N 0 O v 3 M N U s D<l 03 a p p O a (D O r O v + % O N N 0 M o iOm m v CD a o00 a 0 MM CD o Caw c 00 v rr -vnoa m N qi p /p � O ii (D ma ^�v CD N p N C O d n n< p_ N v C v v C �- S O m N 3 ' n �.om �- O M d N (D N D 3 m p �_ N mCD (DN Q N 3 d M .< p .< (D fD ? O O X. N O' M N W N n N v O N O. O. hp (fl 01).� O v o s cn a •� 3 v. o 0 n o'er o v �o n < `< 0 i m 0 ODD a. O (D O N pO N_ O' N 0 (P fl c C D i n m� 0 0 M O O N O M MfD KN 'in 0 0 O c p m v � c Nco m m mm 00 p SN —n g no 00 Z pr = O N N N N N N N o — I ig n D m O C: m O Z r� N O O Y h] D _..-..-_.-......... ........ ........-.......-- ...... ... ..... ... ....... ....... ... ....... ... -. ....... - - - -------- _ . . . ..................... ........... ...... .. . .......... ........3 IZ 1 =CLm N to .(n C• � n Q N nib C aMw CL rn CL m a a Zr (D 0 3� CL e.+ C Q n CL a b:3 n (D fD M c(D z iDM !° `< o {i CD -n O O w v -.! � (n N90 r-0 (D a1 m CL N Q'nm W - to o n �l Wm ° -:E 0- . �I j C I� ! III —i ° rn� N Q c I V D� (D 3 � (D l . w m aI (D M ro rn -0 rn � O CD 3 � tD i � � j r* 0 o �3 rr c ro �„ ��CD mom �CL 1 ~R use otn��,-r � � C:)o 3 t ❑.. Q Q cu Dr n 3_ r-� C Q m m�'• fD 3 c7 �°�-, C.nQ �;D CD cr 0 (D! W o I �i rn rt=(0 Z rn Om co ��i o v C ° ami O iD 3 :3 (n 0 v � w CD 0 (D ( a s C 0 —N sv 0 =r (D ID 0 -, 0 - p ° Zr0 6 iz- � � 71:3 I � CD _0 a DQ rr (D to ! i C i G f D r� m�Ea n '* IDI 05c (D pr CZ La 1 =CLm N to .(n C• � n Q N nib C aMw CL rn CL m a a Zr (D 0 CL e.+ C Q n CL a b:3 n (D fD M c(D z E m�Ea IDI 05c (D CT Vi tO (a r=r 4(D© N to .(n C• � n Q N nib C aMw CL rn CL m a a Zr (D 0 (n Cl e.+ C Q n zr(Dw v b:3 n (D fD M c(D rV iDM !° `< o {i CD -n O O w v -.! � (n N90 r-0 (D IF m CL N Q'nm W - to o n �l Wm ° -:E 0- x 0 o° v i� —i ° rn� N Q c I V D� (D 3 � (D l . w m aI (D M ro rn -0 rn � O CD 3 � tD i � � j r* 0 o �3 rr c ro �„ ��CD mom ! o ' o Z use otn��,-r � � C:)o 3 t ❑.. Q Q cu Dr n 3_ r-� C Q m m�'• fD 3 c7 �°�-, C.nQ �;D CD cr 0 (D! W o �i rn rt=(0 Z rn Om co ��i o v C ° ami O iD 3 :3 (n 0 v � w CD 0 (D ( a s C 0 —N sv 0 =r (D ID 0 -, 0 - p ° Zr0 6 (D 77 � � 71:3 _0 a DQ rr (D to D ;U C m 0 m O Z 0 m O fV CD 0 Cri N n 0 CP /� ifs o a-0 A)( o � c a 03 5 7 C r (D (�D (D L n `2 (D Q c n3 vca N (DID N �� c N r 3 3 N � v(" �1 Q. (D O (D S p 3 (D N Q ro .-t '•r N C ro p C7 O w C ro 70 0 N O ° �C) rF �ro m �• �ro �n3__ n (D rn � � ITR OL rD v 3 0 S. roN• � T C3 in E `D, (Cn aM0IOD 0 � n C CL O a)O c v (p CO ¢7 �. p roC N rr N Q Q 3 rD a D0 p E3 wt C C• (D ro rp ID ro (ZF D 00_ L. [n 1 (�D b (D X � � rr S ' 5 O (D3'5 c� CDD ED - N Q(n v r* C � CL O C Q � <6 :3 C Ln 0-� (D ��7.�: CL a ; Amon o� �. N n g `ter- a�mCo 0 CD z;CL, rno CD C N U? I Q c o=(D v0 ZZ r ��_ (D CD W 7r N. O �j N 0 O ':3) o m � � .N• v r= g 90 °� o m (DN ^� Q° C O 5 (p 00 h N Jx Q I Z r CFM 0 0 m �(D (D `A o T� O r. rr-r N O CCD © S % r C`C� �•b 5 C>CD 3 LV 1 � 1 n 0 CP /� ifs o a-0 A)( o � c a 03 5 7 C r (D (�D (D L n `2 (D Q c n3 vca N (DID N �� c N n 3 3 N � v(" Q. (D O (D S p 3 (D N Q ro .-t '•r N C ro p C7 O w ED ro 70 0 N O ° �C) rF �ro m �• �ro �n3__ n (D rn � � „oma OL rD v 3 0 S. roN• � ANN C3 in E `D, (Cn aM0IOD 0 ro (D C CL O a)O v (p CO ¢7 �. p roC N rr N Q Q 3 rD a D0 p E3 wt C C• (D ro rp ID ro (ZF D 00_ L. [n 1 (�D b (D X � � rr S ' 5 O (D3'5 CDD ED - N Q(n v r* n- cO_n '< (D `C � CL O C Q � <6 :3 C Ln 0-� (D ��7.�: CL a ; Amon o� �. N n g `ter- a�mCo 0 CD z;CL, rno CD C N U? Q c o=(D v0 ZZ r ��_ (D CD _ 7r N. O �j N 0 O ':3) o m � � .N• v r= g 90 °� o m (DN ((D ((DD Q° C O 5 (p 00 h os 0ro(D0 p�' m � O 0 Z r CFM 0 0 m �(D (D `A o T� O r. rr-r N O CCD Ma I Now0 Z 0 0 m X 0 v N 0 Q 1 i m 0 C m 0 c I Z 0 m D m O C m 0 z C) -n N O O lirlN n 3 CD o (D C CL o aT (a O O c(0) m � a 0 03 w sro � 1 c 3,1�D (D CD CD ''. O N �N�ro _ Q -oCD W 7 C Q CL ,_CDV) r C 3 a C N ¢ro Q 3 (D n O N L/1 CD n 17 3 � 0)a-)� O 0 O O c CD Q r - O CD 77 ((D _ O(D IDC) � (D �7 ADAD w CL O o W) r' 27 o �m ro Ro @ 3 ZY �� N ��oo@ �~ O g (D o N i�- N r J C o C 0 (D OM = � a S ID m N ro rD cu o(nca =, >- Oy ZT (D ro* 0- N 3 mmDro 3� mn hm�'w,�. C: (ten Q 0-0 a (D av 3 (D Q C CD �oo x•m cn N (DCD =N ID O n Ln 4) �(�W d Q sn tQ v 0 o `c K v� (D w rt 0.3 o,- rr > 6 00 3 Al C", 3 ro 7 u . D n �n as C> �:3in � d w 3 °-rompm CL @ c: @ CCD CD� 0 nuc c yCIS cDm (D (D 0 0 Q. 0 0 3 �1 r :E n -o o ;- m � w 0 (D CD (D ro O Y C { f ... ....... . . ol Z�j r 1 0 co >,\ e� t NN x o. moi, p m n 3 CD o (D C CL o aT (a O O c(0) m � a 0 03 w sro � 1 c 3,1�D (D CD CD ''. O N �N�ro _ Q -oCD W 7 C Q �n ZI OL ro ,_CDV) r C 3 a C N ¢ro Q 3 (D n O N L/1 CD n 17 3 � 0)a-)� O 0 O O c CD Q r - O CD 77 ((D _ O(D IDC) � (D w CL O o W) r' 27 o �m ro Ro @ 3 ZY �� N ��oo@ O g (D o m �fl(�u m a, 4] Q- N n n C o C 0 (D OM = � a S ID m N ro rD cu o(nca =, >- Oy ZT (D ro* 0- N 3 mmDro 3� mn hm�'w,�. C: (ten Q 0-0 a (D av 3 (D Q C CD �oo x•m cn N (DCD =N ID O n Ln 4) �(�W d Q sn tQ v 0 o `c v� (D 3 �� C) 0.3 o,- rr > 6 00 3 Al C", 3 ro 7 u . D n �n as C> �:3in � d w 3 °-rompm CL @ c: @ CD� 0 nuc c yCIS cDm (D (D 0 0 Q. 0 0 3 h-. ZO :E n -o o ;- m � w 0 (D CD (D ro O m 0 Z 0 r 0 m X 0 ;1 v X 0 C m 0 Z 0 :z 'mss 0 a 0 m o CD CD a �0 av 0) (D �c M o o � ac 3 � 0 Q m 3 C. m* o 3 v N. (D r 0 O (D OSm � D(D cC, 3�� �n o� (D �� f/1 G n A S A Z (D ,G S N4 m —a S v sv m (na ti; N mDon o a-) ,,,' m m a l o a0 o m �r- m 0 c (D v m v X C) 3 (7m o no oN a's 30 m oo (D N 0 N °1 0 (D N' SN (D Q m JN O Ow Nomnv 0° = �.o mmm �:E �*, S v S � o_ (Dm < (D m N 0 it fj G 0 3 N 3 O o (D N m D ° GG_11m �3 (D so (D . ti (D j 3(D tOi, S (D OX O �. C N (D n O (D D (D� N O O G D 0 0 o, _. 0 m 3 m 0 0-0-v CD - o n 3 0 OD o 0-j 3 Cr 0 -nn 'p Q o m v , v Go aD Mm C: D * cn c m o o ' (D Ci (O N D C 0o a m3o(vn c 2 0 U1 a CD v 0 0 w 0CD (D 0 c c m 0 Z r U N �Cxm D a nv O m O oQ C o J 1\\ !. (b Cb 7\ " a 0 m o CD CD a �0 av 0) (D �c M o o � ac 3 � 0 Q m 3 C. m* o 3 v N. (D r 0 O (D OSm � D(D cC, 3�� �n o� (D �� f/1 G n J (D m N o 3 0- a) (D ,G S N4 m —a S v sv m (na ti; N mDon o a-) ,,,' m m a l o a0 o m �r- m 0 c (D v m v X C) 3 (7m o no oN a's 30 m oo (D N 0 N °1 0 (D N' SN (D Q m JN O Ow Nomnv 0° = �.o mmm �:E �*, S v S � o_ (Dm < (D v D O ov CD v�. N 0 it fj G 0 3 N 3 O o (D N m D ° GG_11m �3 (D so (D . (D (D O -O o_ (D j 3(D tOi, S (D OX O �. C N (D n O (D D (D� N O O G D 0 0 o, _. 0 m 3 m 0 0-0-v CD - o n 3 0 OD o 0-j 3 Cr 0 -nn zPFv@AN Q o m v , v Go aD Mm C: D * cn c m o o ' (D Ci (O N D C 0o a m3o(vn c 2 0 v nm (D o Q, CD v 0 0 w 0CD (D 0 c c m 0 Z r U N �Cxm D a nv O m O oQ C o C C) D m O c m O z C) m O N O O CJl N D D � 0 � CL o cry. 0 = pr Lt fm O � c a. m:� ¢czgov� �. (D ° @. Q ro 05 CD D (D (D rD N Z.opNO- (Cl m D CL m us v 41 CD :3 (DD " CL -m UQ (ZD) �Qa.) -�" o�Q�3��� (Dw Z Q 0 0 (D (CD ZT OO � @ f� ro r?m 'mss, nro- N CL " LD. O ro O 5' m=' O-�o�rom � (D D 0 n Ei U o ro n ro Dui -« o �U r+ o 7 o N D * O a . ('D( rn Z v 7-1< (D Cx ni p � 3 CD m N n. CL 8) m* ' 7roroD� n C C C N r r O CQ O o (D o v 3 ca (D o o (D r� � 2' (-Dx ra W CD '7 rn rD �. o N v S 3 (6 7 Q =�°5,�om cn (a v 0 O •C R vU)r° 3 -do Ci o S. W 1l so v MD o : " .- cr O (D � o ��� Q s N ro- 0 t Cn� h O O C�E �� rn� � ro OCD m C (D s ((D c O m c�cgroN mm o 0O Q°oo -* :�E C) 0 0m o ((DD CD ((D O 4— e4 C r 0 O CD 3 rf• CD D � 0 � CL o cry. 0 = pr Lt fm O � c a. m:� ¢czgov� �. (D ° @. Q ro 05 CD D (D (D rD N Z.opNO- (Cl m D CL m us v 41 CD :3 (DD " CL -m UQ (ZD) �Qa.) a o�Q�3��� (Dw Z 0 0 (D (CD ZT OO � @ f� ro r?m 'mss, nro- N CL " LD. O ro O 5' m=' O-�o�rom � (D D 0 n Ei U o ro n ro Dui -« o �U r+ o 7 o N D * O a . ('D( rn m— r te �s v 7-1< (D Cx ni p � 3 CD m N n. CL 8) m* ' 7roroD� n C C C N r r O CQ O o (D o v 3 ca (D o o (D r� � 2' (-Dx ra W CD '7 rn rD �. o N v S 3 (6 7 Q =�°5,�om cn (a v 0 O •C vU)r° 3 -do Ci o S. W 1l so v MD o : " .- cr O (D � o ��� Q s N ro- 0 Cn� h O O C�E �� rn� � ro OCD m C (D s ((D c O m c�cgroN mm o 0O Q°oo -* :�E C) 0 0m o ((DD CD ((D O C') D C m O C: m 0 z n n v 0 C) D a w o M A :_ -u x 0 � c a3 CL o CD (MnQ (D 7 _ 0 3 v � Ccm � ZF ID(D0'-QpvO- � NICD nQ CD (D @ M=r -ro—mom m -, m Q � U) CL � C} C Q CDLn O N D :E [!1 (D (D I to C a CD O DO 00 O C (D O r om O N `� t � :2 (D AD a S 00 f CD m vc?o D r > . + fn N CD W- '"� r— fJ Q I E7 7 CD OL =r [1 (E1 O C] N (D t�ii O N O (nD r � o Err !R h m-D� ' n �CD -00) N rr (f? "O0 my (D , Q (D C C [D r C Q" [].. � to tli n ~ d � cn Q 3 3N v m 3o n rt D `tea 0 I_- Im cD 3 w3 �U)LD.� C� `C ID Q0 CA � 3- 7 m n Q- m m m O CD O Q n _ (2 C C Q 90 .« p Q 0 0 0 s; 30Mw CD(DCD Q to 7 d F I 1. C� *! �. a a co 7 \ rCS SCS ' 3 a a a w o M A :_ -u x 0 � c a3 CL o CD (MnQ (D 7 _ 0 3 v � Ccm � ZF ID(D0'-QpvO- � NICD nQ CD (D @ M=r -ro—mom m -, m Q � U) CL � C} C Q CDLn O N D :E [!1 (D (D I to C a CD O DO 00 O C (D O r om O N `� t � :2 (D AD a S 00 f CD m vc?o D 0 N . + fn N CD W- '"� r— fJ Q I E7 7 h -n N (D OL =r [1 (E1 O C] N (D t�ii O N O (nD r � o Err !R h m-D� ' n �CD -00) N rr (f? "O0 my (D Q (D C C [D f0 (A W @ {D 5 C Q" [].. � to tli n ~ d � cn Q 3 3N v m 3o n rt D `tea 0 I_- Im cD 3 w3 �U)LD.� C� `C ID Q0 CA � 3- 7 m n Q- m m m O CD O Q n _ (2 C C Q 90 .« p Q 0 0 0 s; 30Mw CD(DCD Q 0 Z 0 0 m X -n N /C) yl 2 m 0 C m 0 Z 0 C7 C m 0 m O z n Ti 0 N 0 0 N n �* 0 CL O rr -o CO 0 a w fl. °a,.3�2� .N r 0 O ID cn ID 7� O 3 �(D C g C_�OL c D� (D IIID C (OD n 3 Q 3 N N S w v Q Q����30.= (D CD CD (D (n CL N C O O 01 v� (D ai C (D L g Oo Cc) ro—ter O =) W n n � 3 (D m a m (D Orn 0 n� normo cin Q T r�r t!i r O Q (D F 0) 01 (D S2°M O_ m CD oW -,(�„omC�� O N N 7C (D (DIODO _ r -r S 0) O rL O 0 m L2 m = 3 ro Q N � =Dr WO >n d 3 7 (D lw+ C �• mlon (D M 7 mq (D (D (�DE. O- [D o (D (D 3 Z5I X. K ro '< 4 0) cn oo � ' cn O cn ~� cn 91 OC) :3 �m��I CL Dac��o �m m m z $U� a s 0 Zn ° � = y°a0 �� hZ,0�o O ro :3 M C) cn � - CL :E 0 r -L (D �� =r v 0 7 M� c (D ("D , co O n ZY 0 am3Tcon' .. � c 90 X (CD CD C O 5 (D cc fl) ,x�.O0 mm;OO Z C7 o C: N Co � r O 0 ci. CL R fi N ^ N S eZ .i^ S -t> -z-4 i4 d ; S' v� Yl n 0 �X N n �* 0 CL O rr -o CO 0 a w fl. °a,.3�2� .N r 0 O ID cn ID 7� O 3 �(D C g C_�OL c D� (D IIID C (OD n 3 Q 3 N N S w v Q Q����30.= (D CD CD (D (n CL N C O O 01 v� (D ai C (D L g Oo Cc) ro—ter O =) W n n � 3 (D m a m (D Orn 0 n� normo cin Q T r�r t!i r O Q (D F 0) 01 (D S2°M O_ m CD oW -,(�„omC�� O N N 7C (D (DIODO _ r -r S 0) O rL O 0 m L2 m = 3 ro Q N � =Dr WO >n d 3 7 (D lw+ C �• mlon (D M 7 mq (D (D (�DE. O- [D o (D (D 3 Z5I X. K ro '< 4 0) cn oo � ' cn O cn ~� cn 91 OC) :3 �m��I CL Dac��o �m m m z $U� a s 0 Zn ° � = y°a0 �� hZ,0�o O ro :3 M C) cn � - CL :E 0 r -L (D �� v 0 7 M� c (D ("D , co O n ZY 0 am3Tcon' .. � c 90 X (CD CD C O 5 (D cc fl) ,x�.O0 mm;OO Z C7 o C: N Co o � n) O 0 ci. i! m 0 z 0 r 0 m mn v til 1 n m 0 a C M 0 C f Z 0 0 rt m CD tx. o �� C7 7C _* to O 7 3 c CL wCD CL �� � ` � . 0 (D r . ^� r CC] (:D' O M cn a� (n a (D TID n v mm CL �D�� 0 Q) �y 0 WC) c E2 C) (D O O `� 0 N O Q �-� N r° 3 0 0. NNi-o0 O N- S?o (D v Q Ql N (D r v (D - m =1 (D =3 � OOm N m (D 0 v (Cn p p -, N 'r1 �. Q1 � � Q (D CD i11 Or N O CD O N N N (D ID IL) `5' m 3 (D 5 PD rvr C (D (D ' ID x cn rt 33 C z N rD � n O N N (D �< m 0. v (D D 0 CD, CD 0 4 3 m z OLa v 7� c ro W CD m et �o G.�Q c (D3 S C) =1 0'� �00� �. N p . C N N o v cCo o m NZ.1V � n. � m C �(DCIDD I,+ CL CL 51 o '* C O(Qmm 0) E l 0 �'CD N O 0 `D(, (D (D 00 C� 0 0 w 00 lu m �' O Z c O c 7 CoC 27 O � Q C7 0 7l C 0 C2 —r (D N .� n' ILA 1 4 W CD 0 rt m CD tx. o �� C7 7C _* to O 7 3 c CL wCD CL �� � ` � . 0 (D r . ^� r CC] (:D' O (D m c cn a� (n a (D TID n v mm �(D �D�� 0 Q) �y 0 WC) c � 0 (= 9' C) (D O O `� 0 N O Q �-� N r° 3 0 0. NNi-o0 O N- S?o (D v Q Ql N (D r v (D - m =1 (D =3 � OOm N m (D 0 v (Cn p p -, N 'r1 �. Q1 � � Q (D CD i11 Or N O CD O N N N (D ID IL) `5' m 3 (D 5 PD rvr C (D (D ID x 3 rt 33 C z N rD � n O N N (D �< m 0. v (D D 0 CD, CD 0 4 3 m z OLa v 7� c ro W CD m et �o G.�Q Q7 (') (D3 S C) =1 0'� �00� �. N p . C N N o v cCo o m � n. � m C �(DCIDD v0 o '* C O(Qmm 0) E l 0 93 03 N n _ O 0 `D(, (D (D 00 C� 0 0 w 00 lu m �' O Z c O c 7 CoC 27 O � Q C7 0 7l C 0 C2 —r (D N rn 0 z 0 0 L m X n v N 0 Ul N m n 2 m 0 n C m 0 z 0 C? D C m O C m O Z T) n 0 0 C) T D n o 3 CL 9 �1 rt - O N 7 Q � oa o - a z mro C) (o ?-- ILI Q (D O c cn O N ow - OZ) (a N f O r - (D O S -, Q S. m :� coro -�� 3 ro ui Q M C ��am CL 50 a1 (D vi v j O a 0 p cm: m o r 5 O N �2 0 WO � N (D N m (i a @ @ F v o �. o N 0 (P r'' N�i ¢ ' O 53.0 C7 m �� m C7a C7 (n n c O rn o m o`* Lo x -g CD CD Om c � CO��v v `° (^v�mm p� S S Q ro CD 5 1 CD 3 3 N C (p C W CD N , t Uy r+ (D (Ca N MQ Q (D .0 `C N O. fD O X• N u�m m 4 Ll m 0 v rD�=�-oon N o o c m D om c� �DjD a u� nN a Cl)r+ o CD _yamzy v0 CL@NQ(q (D C (D CD oC���� vs c �(ocDm mm m�g9. O OO h 90 100 v Q"ro Z) 3 6101 O w , (D m � rnm n o 3 ro CDrt n o 3 CL 9 tr 90 (D xrt 0 a c CL N .� m Q rt - O N 7 Q � oa o - (D 3-Cn)°S mro C) (o �.opvOL m Q (D O c cn O N ow - OZ) (a N f O r - (D O S -, Q S. m :� coro -�� coca ui Q M C ��am CL 50 a1 (D vi v j O a 0 p cm: m o r 5 O N �2 0 WO � N (D N m (i a @ @ F v o �. o N 0 (P r'' N�i ¢ ' O 53.0 C7 m �� m C7a C7 (n n c O rn o m o`* N m x -g CD CD Om m° Q r � CO��v v `° (^v�mm p� S S Q c D m N . CD 5 1 CD 3 3 N C (p C W CD N , t Uy r+ (D (Ca N MQ Q (D .0 `C N O. fD O X• N u�m m rn Wo v� m 0 v rD�=�-oon v m o o c m D om c� �DjD a u� nN a Cl)r+ o CD _yamzy v0 CL@NQ(q (D C (D CD oC���� vs c �(ocDm mm m�g9. O OO h 90 100 v Q"ro Z) 3 6101 O w , (D m rnm 0 0 Z 0 0 m n mn v 1 m 0 n X C m 0 Z 0 n rr N Q � O a� 0 0 N Q N N Q. o C 7 N N Cu CD tl (CD 3 d' G 0 EF m fD (D �. o p to m L 7[ 'T Q D C( 0 h Cw 0 N 3 Uf r�r O _3 (D — :3 :D 7 C!I L (D CF CID cna C a(ID D_n o w z:, n 73 CL 0 n (D 0 m :5- X 0 CD 3 � o o rt , CD CD r. CD nm a=r spa. o -,�fD� Q Cpm o CD nCD CD 47 r r 0 o 0 m m f o 3 �_ CD c Q�� n W CD � ZY CD M N) rn 3 ro v 3 0CD ru t �^o u'� � S 0 CCD -, CD (D n CD 3 CD CD M' M M N _ CD (O N 'n CD Q C) om CD R 0 Q CD K CD CD (/� v (p 0' fD 3 n N N Cv CL 0 a) @ 0 a) CD V' Ep��� N �° a �• '0 n o�. 000 �> 3_ O CSD n @• 0th N t0 ,rt ao CD �� �ms Q1 0 Q- CD v 0 CD zi c = cncm �nni �iaCD 00 oC>(� m� mm c(nc0mm X-co��Q° c c 0 -• t O n •� 0 Zo�wM W C(D CCD COD O G � N r'• r' uNi � 1 1 7Q n rr N Q � O a� 0 0 N Q N N Q. o C 7 N N Cu CD tl (CD 3 d' G 0 EF m fD (D �. o p to m L 7[ 'T Q D C( 0 h Cw 0 N 3 Uf r�r O _3 (D — :3 :D 7 C!I L (D CF CID cna C a(ID D_n o w z:, n 73 ,< o O C 0 n (D 0 m :5- X 0 CD 3 � o o rt , CD CD r. CD nm a=r spa. o -,�fD� Q Cpm o CD nCD n -n CD no CD f/1 r r 47 r r 0 o 0 m m f o 3 �_ CD c Q�� n W CD � ZY CD M N) rn 3 ro v 3 0CD a a �^o u'� � S 0 CCD -, CD (D n CD 3 CD CD M' M M N r r CD (O N 'n CD Q C) om CD R 0 Q CD K CD CD (/� v (p 0' fD 3 n N N Cv CL 0 a) @ 0 a) CD V' Ep��� N �° a �• '0 n o�. 000 �> 3_ O CSD n @• 0th 3 n Iv ,rt ao CD �� �ms Q1 0 Q- CD v 0 CD zi = cncm �nni �iaCD 00 oC>(� m� mm c(nc0mm X-co��Q° c c 0 -• O n •� 0 Zo�wM W C(D CCD COD O rn O Z 0--) C m 0 m 0 z C) n N O O th N A .0 = _rt O CL o cr IV 0 O 0 7 C a3 a fTi coLS 3 OS v 6 =r C7 0 c fD 71 3 0 cl � N C O LO [p (D fA O :3 7 Q 3 (D CCD (n Q C Q 7 fD 0 O w 0 {D C7 I 0 p fD O (D o (DD zr O O fD CD o rn 0 CD -ti O S (D f CD 0, n (D 0 O �? u, o 2 � O '* to 0 m M 0 CI- v SS S fD mri �g���� �330�� ro '� ro Dm n @ N h N N N 3 caC1 WCD (D C C m Z) Sr, x. (D 3 =' W CD rD n( m T w @ O- CL cn cd n O c Scn (D��_�Q Q 0S O ,- ~—F >0 �ro � ���Q o < Cr N LD 0 C.n T- Er v M* 0)0 Q T° o :M7 C�@ca 0 0 0 O C) 2 N fl1 r: t � _�90 (D CD 0 00 90 C 0 � C) O 0 r m O 3 O a, cn CL O CD h fA CZ3 e rrr � n 0 O 3 CD A .0 = _rt O CL o cr IV 0 O 0 7 C a3 a fTi coLS 3 OS v 6 =r C7 0 c fD 71 3 0 cl � N C O LO [p (D fA O :3 7 Q 3 (D CCD (n Q C Q 7 fD 0 O w 0 {D C7 I 0 p e CD o r N O (D o (DD zr O O fD CD o rn 0 CD -ti O S (D f CD 0, n (D 0 O �? u, o 2 � O '* to 0 m M 0 CI- v SS S fD mri �g���� �330�� ro '� ro Dm n @ N h N N N 3 caC1 WCD (D C C m Z) Sr, x. (D 3 =' W CD rD n( m T w @ O- CL cn cd n O c Scn (D��_�Q Q 0S O ,- ~—F >0 �ro � ���Q o < Cr N LD 0 C.n T- Er v M* 0)0 Q T° o :M7 C�@ca 0 0 0 O C) 2 N fl1 r: C y SQ CD (D � _�90 (D CD 0 00 90 C 0 � C) O 0 r m O 3 O a, cn m m m O C rn sc D C m 0 C m 0 Z C) n D^ 0 0 D r%l 0 ' CD CD CL -« o dM .: to0 C N CL m Q ju a (D mh O {V ID o °i m3-Cnl (D (D n ro 0 w ZD:, - 0 rt� O U� ro ci l� Q a - cD Q r _. mL '0 't- C nk tD 0 a) 0 (' 0 CL O 7 0 Q 1V 0 N O(D (D j C7 CD .-.. m m w w n 0 LD L O (.n 3 o ;c-) CD El Spm * � UO C) C� ui n (D C (ll r r p (D0 •0_ N m ;� tOn O m a (D N vs C O W � w a(n m mm a� (p m . � S N rr0 0- tn CD Z, 0 r -F O • S 0 T : m� hororoDcD C a N 2 v (<DC N .. QvCD 3 'D OX (D Q N 0 rn �' rD 0 (D rD rD n m rD 7 fl R C (n w 0 3 N ren 3 ro o 0 y VO e �a 0 oc� � 3]� ro =s wco'Duti ._+ ao to o CD �,m� w 0 G-�' w pm rt Zr N C (D = C @ (D ,:! n n 0 t p1 C C (Q (D ro N po ro (D O O 0 sio r. o 60 0w0m ow (D CDN CCD (D E; C L aIL t^► O ro CD 0 ' CD CD CL -« o dM .: to0 C N CL m Q ju a (D mh O {V ID o °i m3-Cnl (D (D n ro 0 w ZD:, - 0 rt� O U� ro rF r (D- CL �. Q a - cD Q r _. mL '0 (n Orn C nk tD 0 a) 0 (' 0 n C r« _ 0 C (D r 0 O 7 0 Q 1V 0 N O(D (D j C7 CD .-.. m m w w n 0 LD L O (.n 3 o ;c-) CD El Spm * � UO C) C� ui n (D C (ll r r p (D0 •0_ N m ;� tOn O m a (D N vs C O W � w a(n m mm a� (p m . � S N rr0 0- tn CD Z, 0 r -F O • S 0 T : m� hororoDcD C a N 2 v (<DC N .. QvCD 3 'D OX (D Q N 0 rn �' rD 0 (D rD rD n m rD 7 fl R C (n w 0 3 N ren 3 ro o 0 y �.a o o c w �a 0 oc� � 3]� ro =s wco'Duti ._+ ao CD �,m� w 0 G-�' w pm rt Zr N C (D = C @ (D ,:! n n 0 0 (7 �r- (A p1 C C (Q (D ro N po ro (D O O 0 sio r. o 60 0w0m ow (D CDN CCD (D E; m O Z O r O Tm N 0 v 0 ON n V) S > (D o m a o cv pr= fQ o O 3 C N � � � CL mCD °(0'3��� ep- o O m 0 O (D (0N 3 CD (m [D c N O (a a p (D 'so _n �o N N C N D y O 3 �p0 d N O Q� z Q (D (=D O S (WD N 0 N "O (D a 0 O_ O 0 n c 0 m 0 0 0(D r.-, n3( n C) m O o O N o_ m n m o0 N3 0 (D N N N ro o) N (D 90 (D Q m N ° mnm Ono 0 T m ON r. � �+; 3 N Q (D NN N ° o o) N N rr _. V (D I !2' Qo De ID a M v -O 3D ( (DD N CD a S 0 (D= 0_ (o m 30 N s (D xo O 0�3� N N (o n N (D O p S N (D O O — o � N° O 3 cD w N 3 N °s y Q m (D o-30 0 m ° ouD -D N N � a ��vCo o (D o_ (D m N 0 o N CD O of O O D � � c n (a CD Iwo O w m 1\ 93N 00 m 0 F � I'D < n 3 C) (D m 0o v o�(DCDn C+ 0 N N O O Z m s o N 0 0 T - ✓� j r J C.J tlji `lJJ �1 W �N O. to (O C l o CDd 75 � Gil > (D o m a o cv pr= fQ o O 3 C N � � � CL mCD °(0'3��� o O m 0 O (D (0N 3 CD (m [D c N O (a a p (D 'so _n �o N N C N D y O 3 �p0 d N O Q� z (D G O S (D (=D O S (WD N 0 N "O (D a 0 O_ O N p Cr 0 n c 0 m 0 0 0(D r.-, n3( n C) m O o O N o_ m n m o0 N3 0 (D N N N ro o) N (D 90 (D Q m N ° mnm Ono 0 T m ON r. � �+; 3 N Q (D NN N ° o o) N N rr _. V (D I !2' Qo De ID a M v -O 3D ( (DD N CD a S 0 (D= 0_ (o m 30 N s (D xo O 0�3� N N (o n N (D O p S N (D O O — o � N° O 3 cD w 3 N °s y Q m (D o-30 0 m ° ouD -D N N � a ��vCo o (D o_ (D m N 0 o N C? cn O of O O D � � c n (a CD Iwo O w m (3D 93N 00 m 0 F � I'D < n 3 C) (D m 0o v o�(DCDn C+ 0 N N O O Z m s o N 0 0 T - O Q O N N 0 0 k - i ( - \/ CL B 3 [ e}:»7§\/ \= /cD3-n \c // }2*, < q � [ i@}§s»o »©\\[/ \\ \\ \\\\ \ . , 2 ) //\\3 }( \)3 UO oa 2 2(.D \E \/ / \ > }\�\ \ \ , =,me> � k- \)\ \k . 3 0-(D «,} _fD 0 [4 \(\(ƒEf§ � � ( D I -{}\»�/�;/ \( ;)C /} \\(;m ( 2¥\E( }»§af o ; z C) CD 00 //�\\ [§ \030 V z » $CD > c ^. \ .\ . \ 0 k - i ( - \/ CL B 3 [ e}:»7§\/ \= /cD3-n \c // }2*, i@}§s»o »©\\[/ \\ \\ \\\\ mm 2. (D M //\\3 }( \)3 UO oa 2 2(.D \E \/ / }\�\ \ \ , =,me> (D) k- \)\ \k }\}(\\ 3 0-(D _fD 0 [4 \(\(ƒEf§ � ( D I -{}\»�/�;/ \( ;)C /} \\(;m ( 2¥\E( }»§af o ; z C) CD 00 //�\\ [§ \030 \CD \((° I 1 M 0 M 0 C fv P d 3 0 Q 3 3 m 3 3 C l Q z �i.:�.. V' < O ED O EZ n O O Q N = — (ll C) O C .s 0 3 LS'( 3 m �.A G (D (D fD OI Q N IC O (D , 3 � N ED c O(/1 CLIV ( (D <� r N < N rR'*a (D 0 Q T —. Q N C a 3- (D C) n 0 1O N =� O� EDm mED 0 V i ED < V 6 O 0 f 0 (1)— U O 0 m ED = N O (D Si .+ 0 m m ED 2 * m Lib c"") --- ED N N CL Q ED— Q (D D n (D C) - N yD h;....900 C) N C N 0 N M D (D0 N ED ED(7 N � �� n �> >(D ED ED m om N e o @ (D (D p O (D '—Y O O ED rw�fi `tiny N O N. N O Em z Q N O m m O N O 3= --An a o 0 m ,- (..�.... s o (n m� 0 .sed -m vin C) rD 3 0ED I o 0 ED a F N 1� 0 0 (DED vmk 0 cn .� ._....,< Cf)D 0 <In S b 0 O- v 0 (D 0 0-� m Cm ��� (D O O ti O ()(Z ED 9 ED I.vpr„y ......(:�a..... 030 O p� 0 (D o...xa C (D ED (D ED O n rt rt a CD CD� a o i� 7C '� �0 to ¢ a C. m� v 00-0— x•10 0 N.m, Om 05 0- m 3 ro ro o m V5 oCL pv �m rt—Z§7G Q o Z a u%ia CL am, �,Qm n � � ° p m Oro o m o rt m ro hQ v Z @ (D; oo3o. _�_ m N ~' m O C7 0 in Uroi p CD O (11 0 om ro M N rt O 7 O_ m v' [p 0 C O C1 O �7 m 0 C =- aro m �3 N co' �o5pm CD E; 0 CD n � � C ro C in-' O � mn1 ,.« 9 m C d m CL fll CD n ry C S ORS X CD m o 5' 3 :. Q) (1) m (A m .-. Ln m� 7 (D 7 =or CL Vii O tL] a) C n a 3 N � �< � �.o r --C �- M. M� a 'ao `C' Da- Q c 7r N m 7 w D s CrNm o•0 Cy ��m v0 �� w o m :s �:E m a f N jC) o o C) 2 2 G fQ m m mm O OO 3 90 O z2) 0 0 70C �oowmm 77 CD m m m m rL a n n 4 CD lo n rt rt a CD CD� a o i� 7C '� �0 to ¢ a C. m� v 00-0— x•10 0 N.m, Om 05 0- m 3 ro ro o m V5 oCL pv �m m� Q o ca U) m Cr u%ia CL am, �,Qm � � ° p Oro o m o rt m ro hQ v Z @ (D; oo3o. _�_ m N ~' m O C7 0 in Uroi p CD O (11 0 om ro M N rt O 7 O_ m v' [p 0 C O C1 O �7 m 0 C =- aro m �3 �o5pm CD E; 0 CD n � � C ro C in-' O � mn1 ,.« d m CL fll CD n ry C S ORS X CD m o 5' 3 :. Q) (1) m (A m .-. Ln m� 7 (D 7 =or CL Vii O tL] a) C n a 3 N � �< � �.o r 3 0 M. M� a 'ao `C' Da- 7r N m 7 w D s CrNm o•0 ap CD ��m v0 �� w o m :s �:E m a f N jC) o o C) 2 2 G fQ m m mm O OO 90 O z2) 0 0 70C �oowmm 77 CD m m m m a C) D C m O C= -i m 0 Z C7 n O N O O T D a o C CL o wCD � o C N � Q. mC v n O m ro 10-Q_ m ° S ! c. ro a cuCD rD M. p C] SU fD n� L6 oL° � Q r+ om 0 0 Z 3 CD gyp' -t+ (G] ro 6 -+ Q1 g (� inn m C Q �ro C) o su Ln 0 m � zr ro cn n 0 N O C .+ 0 O , �' ro�� a C) ro Sj O O w m m �ro .+ M C) m + m m Wh Q p. O R' �3C o ro N A. �-n 3 ro O n j 0 z n ©mC��m u,�pv O r c CD Oh (D Q Q CDD CD LA r- c�`�v :3(D N r+ D v rp T� m r SS m S m CIIN� (D O IU O vi C) — �, 7 O m ro =5 �' 50 n cn 4 a a n CD w Cl -CD m q CL CD < o o. a �* L<. @ NN C m (DD N r°n a z) QQ 5" cv o (a a) Q m m �, o < ro (D o � � CD O 5 AS O 0 D �0 O w o �3�JU Q m Cion 3 m a N a CD �� �aM* �� o �� Q�� �n CD� h 0) C7 0 0 o C) f tri Hca ro m ro ro CD Op n 0 O� 0 roro o w N �� CDm E; m �v 10 a o C CL o wCD � o C N � Q. mC v n O m ro 10-Q_ m ° S o- (D cuCD rD M. p C] SU fD n� L6 oL° � Q r+ om 0 0 ID m gyp' -t+ (G] ro 6 -+ Q1 g (� inn m C Q �ro C) o su Ln 0 m � zr ro cn n 0 N O C .+ 0 O , �' ro�� a C) ro Sj O O w m m �ro .+ M C) m + m CD o m Wh Q p. O R' �3C o ro N A. �-n 3 ro O n j 0 z n ©mC��m u,�pv O c_ { N Al m CD Oh (D Q Q CDD CD LA r- c�`�v :3(D N r+ D v rp T� m r SS m S m CIIN� (D O IU O vi C) — �, 7 O m ro =5 �' 50 n cn 27 (D n CD w Cl -CD m q CL CD < o o. CD =3 �" +u L<. @ NN C m (DD N r°n a z) QQ 5" cv o (a a) Q m m �, o < ro (D o � � CD O 5 AS O 0 D �0 O w o �3�JU Q m Cion 3 m a N a CD �� �aM* �� o �� Q�� �n CD� h 0) C7 0 o C) f tri Hca ro m ro ro CD Op 0 90�o C%O O� 0 roro o w N �� CDm E; v m 0 z 0 > I 0 l o -I 0 CL -0 0 (D 0 CL CL cn i M— w w 0 loo- -a < �'D M 7D 0 c 3 wn w C) > an o sw , D E3=< 0) ID) I a C U — MC 'm Rl U m 0 w w m N O 3*0 0 0 oM > an 0 0 0 gm a 00 a 3 1 o 0 N 0 :E 0 OR 0 mm c 0 < 5 0 D " K O:E (D 0 a m w F). A g 3 ID (D Q D �'D 0 ON (D (D o aN. C.1- m(on 00 om o - 7 a m rD 0 W M > o CD (D auM� 0- :E 0 CD M 0> PT gg CD 0 (D a ID P.0 0 c) E5 CD M 0 E o 0 0 3 0 co ammo 0 ....... .. ki I j ' , I I -u m 0 z 0 r 0 m X 0 ,n Ul Et n D C m 0 m 0 z 0 n Q fv 0 a fV n n rt -a m rt 0 0 a O m m In �r T "! O O 7 C a � �. o� O CD CD N 70 "G 0(a CD ;;W O- CD c (D r) Z30 (D O OL 7 0 ( C1 ,« m ro o IoM m us a C C? o m CD � sZ (D (n � 0 O O h m CL _ v 0 o � C N, a m o n n o n CD `�' o Q L C z rCD r° (nm 0 CD N w to Cll Cn CD 90 CD LZ m 5 Cep � n 0 � o v rD 21. r CD zrv:oCL m v v p cD. C) Q �, _Nn � N m rr N � m a rD _� n CD D� `C CD -0 CD 3 rD r+ C -0 CD CD -p zr O W C1 � - z:r CD XX 7 r r O. rD n o CD `C @ `� CD D 3 M O O C C(n NCD O Cn � cr O Z3 (A W 3 ��o C- C3 Cll (D a) 3 n 'C CD m m s0-;ra 3v, rDp3w mons o� _.w,D© o (DCo -� a m rn csi 0N C= a CD CD 3 Al o �.�= OCD a mm U) o n C a m 3 En C 2 90 as CD O O cn (D CD O C 0390 D O c C aj 0CD CD O v CD O O z r o W cr om ( (,n a O -n _ s n a rt CD [n O _ N iltl a' N L4 0 G n O m J w n rt -a m rt 0 0 a O m m In �r T "! O O 7 C a � �. o� O CD CD N 3 C0 CD S 7 S' Co : CL C 0(a CD ;;W O- CD c (D r) Z30 (D O OL 7 0 ( C1 ,« m ro o IoM m us a C C? o m CD � sZ (D (n � 0 O O h m o : S17 0(Dm _ v 0 o � C N, a m o n n o n CD `�' o Q L a 3 0 �. �o N_n rCD r° (nm 0 CD N w to Cll Cn CD 90 CD LZ m 5 Cep � n 0 � o v rD 21. C QL v ° w� zrv:oCL m v v p cD. C) Q �, _Nn � N m rr N � m a rD _� n CD D� `C CD -0 CD 3 rD r+ C -0 CD CD -p zr O W C1 � - z:r CD XX 7 r r O. rD n o CD `C @ `� CD D 3 M O O C C(n NCD O Cn � cr O Z3 (A W 3 ��o C- C3 Cll (D a) 3 n 'C CD m m s0-;ra 3v, rDp3w mons o� _.w,D© o (DCo -� a m rn csi 0N C= a CD CD coni Al o �.�= OCD a mm U) o n n p a m 3 En C 2 90 as CD O O cn (D CD O C 0390 D O c C aj 0CD CD O v CD O O z r o W cr om ( (,n a O -n _ p C � � Q rt CD [n O "V m rrr 0 z 0 0 m X mn v O 0 Ul N n A z i m 0 m 0 c z 0 n (p e X. o m m CL o f° 0 O CN ac 3 � CL M <o U.(D a .01 o (D Qm 3 CL O ° (D (D C (p ('�. O N RDo S ;01 N O a- v O N ,cAS S F _ N N 0 O C G Z a -�. co m� Q � m (D m = �.m W d q D_ O 3 CCD' 0 o w p 0 n v o 00 a O 0 p C N o r O 0 N (D 73 N O N O D 0 0 0 N N 2 N (D m O fl N m m. O -• 0 O O (D •Y d 0 (D(D (D ¢o m N C: O o O N C N- O N fU N N O �:E ,y o O p` (D fl CD CD m 3 m N C O n m m 7 S O m N O 0 p o N o v o(D v � '� so ? g o CDIDmD C 3 CD ID � m m N f0 (D Om(IO d N (D D. � <a) G S X. N O A w (D O N N 0 n N N S N 5 m` o a 3 O O D 3 0 T Q N3� N No O N ID (D. c� D CL r QMD O W °m� m o a D m O m �-? m Cm ID 0o oO's�N N c C (Oji co N N 2 D N (D :3 5 * 90 O O o Sp� ? Q Z r 3 0 m w N N N m N -- O (� O b i O .a , _ N Ul i - I n (p e X. o m m CL o f° 0 O CN ac 3 � CL M <o U.(D a .01 o (D Qm 3 CL O � D m O (D (D C (p ('�. O N RDo S ;01 N O 0 O N (D .C. _ N N 0 O E O N a -�. co m� Q � m (D m = �.m W d C D_ O 3 CCD' 0 o w p n 0 n v o 00 a O 0 p C N o r O 0 N (D N O N O D 0 0 0 N N 2 N (D m O fl N m m. O -• 0 O O (D •Y d 0 (D(D (D ¢o m N C: O o O N C N- O N fU N N O �:E ,y o O p` (D fl CD CD m 3 m N C O n O O S O m N O 0 p o N o v o(D v � '� so ? g o CDIDmD m 3 CD ID � m m N f0 (D Om(IO d N (D D. � <a) G S X. N O fD _ (D (D 3 w (D O N N 0 n N N S N 5 m` o a 3 O O D 3 0 T Q N3� N No O N ID (D. c� d' N 0 cOn r QMD w °m� m o a D m O m �-? m Cm ID 0o oO's�N N c C (Oji co N N 2 D N (D :3 5 * 90 O O o Sp� ? Q Z r 3 0 m w N N N m N -- O RK m v in, a s CLC Crm o s Q 3 C. ���Q��CL C� O � ro 3�� 0 mo FF0.opwQ DL " rn Okr (o!p r = =w s11. —rn QC)L �,ca rncs CD =m CD CA Q CL C: 7 o w q rn =r w CL n a O p c (�D . 0 r ZA o h cD cD O * j rr Cil � CD � � � �.0 a (D Li O {D (D 1 -nN O 0- z °ow 'rt `n � ,o0,C oCD m �. Q C p w 3zrN ti m �D O ONf7 C Q O [A - M, - _. a ,D O = =3S0 Uig 4 I 3� N in =+ nw CDQMs0�°� cn E; fD =3 toCL f9 n N 4' S [D EL v, O `C m°m�[c�a O c -� ° o o'er c) �n Q ��� m @ w 0 cr cn D. 0 a cQ ao Cn w0 CD CL w0C CL cD C m —71 2 sfl co m m � CD 0 Q' M ro 0 0 USS �S�nE CL CL 0 r -a O W � m CD CD M (D F` O (� (\J dVfy 'S i v �I L O �o 4 C7 N m a s CLC Crm o s Q 3 C. ���Q��CL C� O � ro 3�� 0 mo FF0.opwQ DL " rn Okr (o!p r = =w s11. —rn QC)L �,ca rncs CD =m CD CA Q CL C: 7 o w q rn =r w -dw 3 O n n a O p c (�D . 0 r om S o h cD cD O * j rr Cil � CD � � � �.0 a (D Li O {D (D 1 -nN O 0- �w 0 °ow 'rt `n � ,o0,C oCD m �. Q C p w 3zrN ti m �D O ONf7 C Q O [A - M, - _. a ,D O = =3S0 Uig CD 3� N in =+ nw CDQMs0�°� cn E; fD =3 toCL f9 n N 4' S [D EL v, O `C m°m�[c�a O w -� ° o o'er c) �n Q ��� m @ w 0 cr cn D. 0 a cQ ao Cn w0 CD CL w0C CL cD C m m�c� 2 sfl co m m � CD 0 Q' M ro 0 0 o 9. :3 �S�nE a 00 0 r -a O W � m CD CD M (D _ O rn O z O C) D m m 0 c m m 0 Z 0 m l7 N O O (P N D � 0 0 o N CL O � 3 o 7 C 3 3 = CL N O N o= N a ((D 3 N (D C Os vw3nn°� C7= co N O vi K N _ O C D w 3 ((ODN O M N w (a O ~ a o � r m N N a C p_ S m C7 O w crt.. •.-• `iM1 ' m m (D O O O 0 N n !4 0 N O ((DD ((D �� o (D m w o 0 0 OCD N O -D CD -n3w300 C) N C (wn g p (D O ( N 4 O O O N (D m O_�O 211 a N v 0 w D � �wmN5 s� CD 00 3 � o 5 o- > > o w CD m0 E �- o °_mayor 3 m �y1 N to cN "m(3 w "Wo -20om aw 3 o-(D5.E3 m� m so�x.(D N O `iIj, .mss M m O N (D m w w � �O' N S (D O O IO w K O w m � _ rt o m �'K rr a N N m 3 O 5w m K O-i", ^w O D .� O i N s 3 'c cr O (D m m N w 0 ( rr N o C/) a o G D m? o m m w 0 w 0 cm CD CC v m n 00 o C7 v c cc c N to m m CD m � CD n 0 0 O 90 op0 Z N = O p3j N (D ((DD N N (mD O J O 3 3 m 3 su m � 0 0 o N CL O � 3 o 7 C 3 3 = CL N O N o= N a ((D 3 N (D C Os vw3nn°� C7= co N O vi K N _ O C D w 3 ((ODN O M N w (a O ~ _— 3 w p 2 �- C o � r m N N a C p_ S m C7 O w O ( I�OK O O (D O O O 0 N n !4 0 N O ((DD ((D �� o (D m w o 0 0 OCD N O -D CD -n3w300 C) N C (wn g p (D O ( N 4 O O O N (D m O_�O , c o w n a N v 0 w D � �wmN5 s� CD 00 3 � o 5 o- > > o w CD m0 E �- o °_mayor 3 m ID W m w cN "m(3 w "Wo -20om aw 3 o-(D5.E3 m� m so�x.(D N O O m O M m O N (D m w w � �O' N S (D O O IO w K O w m � _ rt o m �'K rr a N N m 3 O 5w m K O-i", ^w O D .� O i N s 3 'c cr O (D m m N w 0 ( rr N o C/) a o G D m? o m m w 0 w 0 cm CD CC v m n 00 o C7 v c cc c N to m m CD m � CD n 0 0 O 90 op0 Z N = O p3j N (D ((DD N N (mD O D C m O c -v O z 0 N O O W IV n a 3 =� O C Q o a-0 0) (D rt � 3 CL CL M C n 0 u,(D n' 1, CD O(D -on° CD CD oo0� n� ��C5 o ��a o CD � 100) Mzs =r CL � CD CY - ca 3 �Om ����RD (D c m ZY P CD O7 O _ o(D 3 O .N+ , (D (D .. .--r Ln 0 (D a) O- r -r 'M (D I O N n —. 5. O LD- � _ (D 14 � 0 O (=Dr O N n(n QS (n +O CD p1 O '� (n o 7 : (D Q N j N (n .�+ N v T` -1 N ❑ a. N ❑ zj-N MN(1 0 M IN O? O N 7 O C 7 5�C �(D = '' co in - C (n (D(O N -6 (Q ❑. a)~ � O (D a (D S Q X (D (D N (D 3 N lD `. eJ o_ a N S 3 (D a (o ur .� (CD' �U' �? 3 -°a -nn o' =0T. a U Iz - cr 6 3 (D@ ¢1 0 (n D. 0 cn � � Er Cn CL Q. 7 `°w o W o 00 W CDm O O 9�0 co � nO 0 o W �m� (D (Dm _ O 1 0 CD e� r. �( v t l a 3 =� O C Q o a-0 0) (D rt � 3 CL CL M C n 0 u,(D n' 1, CD O(D -on° CD CD oo0� n� ��C5 o ��a o CD � 100) Mzs =r CL � CD CY - ca 3 �Om ����RD (D o m m ZY -h n -a v ' D C O7 O _ o(D 3 O .N+ , (D (D .. .--r Ln 0 (D a) O- r -r 'M (D I O N n —. 5. O LD- � _ (D 14 � 0 O (=Dr O N n(n C (n +O CD p1 O '� (n o 7 : (D Q N j N (n .�+ N v T` -1 N ❑ a. N ❑ zj-N MN(1 0 M IN O? O N 7 O C 7 5�C �(D = '' a. (D m D( n in - C (n (D(O N -6 (Q ❑. a)~ � O (D a (D S Q X (D (D N (D 3 N lD `. N Qi o_ a N S 3 (D a (o ur .� (CD' �U' �? 3 -°a -nn o' =0T. a Iz - cr 6 3 (D@ ¢1 0 (n D. 0 cn � � Er Cn E y Ali zr 7 `°w o o 00 o n� CDm O O 9�0 co � nO 0 o W �m� (D (Dm _ O O 0 m n mn N V■ 1 t7 D C m O C: m --I O z 0 n 0 0 cn N D n CDD =' o a m CL o cr'a w s� o 4 � C W CL 3 +� Q ro M =j m (D C) c ru --. o a 0- S _ n ��(00) CD O (00) O 3) O7 CL C` CL �Q CQ21) (CD' C) O N D �. 0 `C CD 70 S o ro 0 O Z w N O (D * 27 o ((D O .0 , ro (D N C1 a r+ (D CD N • O _ ro C 5 0vi � QmnoN N { (n 0 Mrt O O a + Q ro m� �m OL rt�'m(D-nm p3 S m S CD Mtj (D O r M j- Q (D `L (D q o C1 (D rr fl; (D IDN (D n ::T -0 W -0 (D Q v C 0 (nom :3ro o 0 (n:3 CD -o d n v `* a:) ffT 0 O Q N r ,< (31 CD a w 3�'Qoi O o O W 0 � S p N � o (Dcr ro Z3 0 �- ro Qo CD m� wn Hiro °-ro�0(D r.S CL Cro N =r 0 O O n� U rn mm c (n(0 m (m*so —� CL c c o x z Oro ov0m �ro ro (Dro CDD c• C1.. C1 0 3 (D rr ED 9� V' n CDD =' o a m CL o cr'a w s� o 4 � C W CL 3 +� Q ro M =j m (D C) c ru --. o a 0- S _ n ��(00) CD O (00) O 3) O7 CL � (a (a �(D cQ (D C ( 3� �(D �Q CQ21) (CD' C) O N D �. 0 `C CD 70 S o ro 0 O c ro o r N O (D * 27 o ((D O .0 , ro (D N C1 a r+ (D CD N • O _ ° -0h� 1 S C 5 0vi � QmnoN O v { (n 0 Mrt O O a + Q ro m� �m OL rt�'m(D-nm p3 S m S CD Mtj (D O r M j- Q (D `L (D q o C1 (D rr fl; (D IDN (D n ::T -0 W -0 (D Q v C 0 (nom :3ro o 0 (n:3 CD -o d n v `* a:) ffT 0 O Q N r ,< (31 CD a w 3�'Qoi O o O W 0 � S p N � o (Dcr ro Z3 0 �- cn n (r v �nN Qo CD m� wn Hiro °-ro�0(D r.S CL Cro N =r 0 O O n� U rn mm c (n(0 m (m*so 00 o 90`n?0 c c o x z Oro ov0m �ro ro (Dro o C D a a rt _'• 0 m c o 0' mu n = �7 O C N r C a 3 3 m � w � CL <o. ova (D O N = N Q o o s o) a (D (7 C m 3 m� 3 �l rD O O- C n� � � . m o O N M 2 N = Q mCD (D 11 (,A N O. C 1z 3 N n S D( 3 a m v �.o OO m OO o c N O r N CD N O (D 2 OT. CD 33 i 0 O 0 m m M 4 O O=v0 (D " O_ O 3 (D (D a n n 'n N N O N Mcg a m a°T. Q m N C d (D (D m2) (D O rrDD vii o (D E. o cn m�" a (D N N N v = cv, —(D ('v (D av 3 Q(D�W m� D 50�x,m t0 N O. (D O 3 d (D D i N Q (D 3 N m � o v W = '* O 3 (n IOD 3 m N � m O 3�° o n 5 o o m < o c y 0 Zv s3 FNo O (D a Cl)m rT as <D �co =*2,m ° m Q o (D° O m ID 0 o a 02 :�N N C N (D N (D �. (D RO (D (D O O ,p , r y. 5 c IFJ C, Z= o N D < NCD N ((DD _ c ° 0 Cl r r� b `b r� n 0 3 3 m Ot D a a rt _'• 0 m c o 0' mu n = �7 O C N r C a 3 3 m � w � CL <o. ova (D O N = N Q o o s o) a (D (7 C m 3 m� 3 (D (D rD O O- C n� � � . m o O N O 2 N = Q mCD (D m = w N O. C 1z 3 N n o v D( a m v �.o OO m OO o c N O r N CD N O (D 2 OT. CD 33 i 0 O 0 m m M 4 O O=v0 (D " O_ O 3 (D (D n n 'n N N O N Mcg a m a°T. Q m N C d (D (D m2) (D O rrDD vii o (D E. o cn m�" Q ID m D I n (D N N N v = cv, —(D ('v (D av 3 Q(D�W m� D 50�x,m t0 N O. (D O 3 d (D D m v N Q (D 3 N m � o v W = '* O 3 (n IOD 3 m N � m O 3�° o n 5 o o m < o c y 0 Zv s3 FNo O (D rD N W 6 (�(D ii UOt Cl)m rT as <D �co =*2,m ° m Q o (D° O m ID 0 o a 02 :�N N C N (D N (D (D RO (D (D O O = O 9. 6-0 Z= o N D < NCD N ((DD O DO u D O IDO m CL 0 P V 0 m x 0 C a3 3 m ,z d 0. m OR m01 Q ID 3 OCD ID ° v n ° 0 (D ? (o O O y _n d � N O rt 3 D m O O. n 0. C a 5 N n O w N -a n n 1 ° O c ID o r A o �o m m m m y N w v F2 0 0 m 0 0 CD go (D =1P -n 3 O O O (D n O N n C N O O 0 N N O ID , o Q O D m O O — C 0 N C7 v �v 0 m 'D + N < vo'nm p v m 0 m N.Dm m Ct D Nn 00 v C =� fD (o N -q 0 Q (D N d N 0 O fD v� 0 fl' N O 3 N D D n 0 N —to oo (� InD O W vci � � � � o - O O' 0�.. G' a O s dom O' I" N O 0 D ID N O o N n� c cnA ;:F o -o XD A� a m O cm 3� ID 0o v cc Nc0 m m 00 O �E O° o z N O N N N N N N N O 5- a CL 27 �3 -O 0 —Nj, O N 3 K ti d —�. "�� Cry ^�.. 6\VjJ� � � �'•i u D O IDO m CL 0 P V 0 m x 0 C a3 3 m ,z d 0. m OR m01 Q ID G OCD ID ° v n ° 0 (D ? (o O O y _n d � N O rt 3 D m O n 0. C a 5 N n O w N -a n n C d ° O c ID o r m e o �o m m m m o 0 N. w v F2 0 0 m 0 0 CD go (D =1P -n 3 O O O (D n O N n C N O O 0 N N O ID , o Q O D m O O — C 0 N C7 v �v 0 m 'D + N < vo'nm p v m 0 m N.Dm m Ct D Nn 00 v C =� fD (o N -q 0 Q (D N d N 0 O fD . .� 5 0� 0 X. (D 0 fl' N O 3 N D D n 0 N —to oo (� InD O W vci � � � � o - O O' 0�.. G' a O s dom O' I" N O 0 D ID N O o N n� c cnA ;:F o -o XD A� a m O cm 3� ID 0o v cc Nc0 m m 00 O �E O° o z N O N N N N N N N O f C m O c m O z C) Ti Q fV O O D n 0 =+ 0 m a o rr-0 0 �= 0 a .� a rt 010, N ((D O T. (D 7S- n o r - O ro 3 m -D (D (D n� rD"'- N 0 Om m (n o Uj O Z (D rr Q N O -� N :3Q (C)M Cr M r _ ('Dw ren C a 3� (D n CC D vs o � m 7 r N O 0 CD :3 0 �; (D m r, �� rn W C rr O O (D � CD N =e; 0 m O90 U c gni 0 N n O N 0 6Y r* N N O ('"D (D (D rn r w Q N =7 fu Q Q 3 (D =rm 3 (D 0M CL N (_� 00 O (D 3 - 5 "" O p rn -' ID �. D � CD rrDD C<D a � mm 10 3 a� mQ T Six -m N C �" (D Q Y vm m n N CL Q CL y � 5 -� < C, (D a mom_ r° 3 �Qo n 0 -3 N .�-r 'Xu O � 3 0 0 �wc N C? CS7 Qo CD cn M w0 Q-CDwpm r7 -r zy CL CD rr 0 0 o n 0,)((00 a) F-: c (D mm 0cMv�° 0 0 0 �°��0 h� � n� o 0 w 0 (D 0 w V r 0 c) rt U` n 0 =+ 0 m a o rr-0 0 �= 0 a .� a rt 010, N ((D O T. (D 7S- n o r - O ro 3 m -D (D (D n� rD"'- N 0 Om m (n o Uj O hc0 a in :Era) (D rr _S _— (D n N O -� N :3Q (C)M Cr M r _ ('Dw ren C a 3� (D n CC D vs o � m 7 r N O 0 CD :3 0 �; (D m r, �� rn W C rr O O (D CD N =e; 0 m O90 n c gni 0 N n O N 0 6Y r* N N O ('"D (D (D rn r w Q N =7 fu Q Q 3 (D =rm 3 (D 0M CL N (_� 00 O (D 3 - 5 "" O p rn -' ID �. D � CD rrDD C<D a � mm Qw 3 a� mQ T Six -m N C �" (D Q Y vm m n N CL Q c0 N 0 � 5 -� < C, (D a mom_ r° 3 �Qo n 0 -3 w 0 O r. QN .�-r 'Xu O � 3 0 0 �wc N C? CS7 Qo CD cn M w0 Q-CDwpm r7 -r zy CL CD rr 0 0 o n 0,)((00 a) F-: c (D mm 0cMv�° 0 0 0 �°��0 h� � n� o 0 w 0 (D 0 w (p (D _ 0 O r O m 0 v tail C7 D C m 0 C m O z 0 n 0 0 0 v~ N D > C o 0 m CL o m -0 7� '* 0 Q C 0 CL 3 ib CL M� =CLro T. CD 0 l carorti c nQ Ln �. o p m CL (a q Z) ro o W�'o� :3 Zr v CDmt (a ( m om D � CIL (D C 3 w m m m am cn a C 5 a 0 ro C? o W � m s� W CD 0 n C: (D � o r `nomX n m o ° 0� m ro . m c7 CD- W Cl (D 0o o sZY(D CL CD 5- 90 (D � -ni 3 0 0 not n c Q. 0 L7 r+ N w N mg o ma- a -- CD V, C rj M z � O N ro S (D m,v roo 3 rrD �• cu oaTo- Z o o -� CD - =35 0 1 ZT m* -roasDro � CD ro v (D M Qm C) B CD Z3 ra 0 ,a x- m OL r m m N N a �� � u, 0 ca nr n ° =,<cnCL �N ` 3 -M 0 0 o c 0 mm �D 0 a ��ry 0 m o ro ro m M o D. n cn QQ CD *ami �ro oCD :3 =r � cCD oC3��� n0 m C-- n(0 ro m ( 2 cn m :E Q° m CD 00 09o=3o n — 0 z w ga)(,ro; CD (D ro m o c CD � n a a CDD N i O 0 m C v su N > C o 0 m CL o m -0 7� '* 0 Q C 0 CL 3 ib CL M� =CLro T. CD 0 l carorti c nQ Ln �. o p m CL (a q Z) ro o W�'o� :3 Zr v CDmt (a ( m om D � CIL (D C 3 w m m m am cn a C 5 a 0 ro C? o W � m s� W CD 0 n C: (D � o r `nomX n m o ° 0� m ro . m c7 CD- W Cl (D 0o o sZY(D CL CD 5- 90 (D � -ni 3 0 0 not n c CD �Nr:Q� 0 L7 r+ N w N mg o ma- a -- CD V, C rj M C � � O N ro S (D m,v roo 3 rrD �• cu oaTo- Z o o -� CD - =35 0 1 ZT m* -roasDro � CD ro v (D M Qm 3 CL (D '-<. CD Z3 ra 0 ,a x- m OL r m m N N a �� � u, 0 ca nr n ° =,<cnCL �N ` 3 -M 0 0 o c 0 mm �D 0 a ��ry 0 m o ro ro m M o D. n cn QQ CD *ami �ro oCD :3 =r � cCD oC3��� n0 m C-- n(0 ro m ( 2 cn m :E Q° m CD 00 09o=3o n — 0 z w ga)(,ro; CD (D ro m o m 0 z 0 r 0 m X n v w n z m 0 a C m 0 I z 0 C s 'J. Lei f u uL H n 3 CD O CL Umu CD CD rr � 3 O C CL 3 M Crt M p 3 d a.,(n D a<) (D � Q (D .-r oW N cro3 q °a ro O c ro yr �. o p of Q ro N Q 0 3 0 N � (D do CD(Dm 1) ' � Om (Q CD 0- ro m Qro W o • m �g � � v," Z N 0 0 n 0 C (D t O r � � 0 m o 0 w- m m m Ci ((DDD) m a m. Cl,+ «mow o - S (gyp ) n3ro00 90rn n� r 1 c 0 03 x :Ev Q o ID N l C �-3Z n ;W, CD (D O m N zr� ro3rD ��o� n omo(D =, ro0 0 (n IDs.>CD �m@��S� CD* _h. ro7oo ro Q a) I (D :5.a '< CDD ro 5 Q a - --n roCD C) CD N (D N N � (D - ( 3 C: (Q 0 � cna 3 v� -< 3 0 r%r O 0 ❑ �3�N ro o 3 C Ro CY C- ro o CD ^3 cn Oz ro =1 CD 0 0 0 n� v � 1=W� (D 2 � ;r CD iD (D =$ 00 S?o��_n 0 (i ..0 Z r o CL rL (D (D (D (D (D 0 Z n O Q n 3 CD O CL Umu CD CD rr � 3 O C CL 3 M Crt M p 3 d a.,(n D a<) (D � Q (D .-r oW N cro3 q °a ro O c ro yr �. o p of Q ro N Q 0 3 0 N � (D do CD(Dm 1) ' 0 Om (Q CD 0- ro m Qro W o m �g � � (D v," � C W, ? O 0 0 n 0 C (D t O r om77 0 m o 0 w- m m m Ci ((DDD) m a m. Cl,+ «mow o - S (gyp ) n3ro00 90rn n� r row,, CD ro m ': c 0 03 x :Ev Q o ID N l C o-� n ;W, CD (D O m N zr� ro3rD ��o� n omo(D =, ro0 0 (n IDs.>CD �m@��S� CD* _h. ro7oo ro Q a) I (D :5.a '< CDD ro 5 Q a - --n roCD C) CD N (D N N � (D - ( 3 C: (Q 0 � cna 3 v� -< 3 �,oa n 0 r%r O 0 ❑ �3�N ro o 3 IDm D. n cn Ro CY C- ro o CD ^3 cn ro =1 CD 0 0 0 n� v � 1=W� (D 2 � ;r CD iD (D =$ 00 S?o��_n 0 (i ..0 Z r o o 0x 0 (D (D (D (D (D (D 0 D C m O C rt7 m O Z 0 n 0 N O d C]i N D n m co a o cm p_q O 0 H CL 3 w w Q - CD =�CD ao - �, oEr (DD O -n :3 �. O W Q N r -f c — (D 3 Q N W. z - h [O CD cr M- m _ Ca Q C a W� C C)m Z w 'a ' -a w - o a0 -, O n O p = (01) 3 O O 10r- CD T m n Q ro @ O O LD. O -� 0 '-"3o o (D O 90 CSD C) a -n 3 O o (nn o CD ren O '" ;zwn to � r* O n CD r a fl . C1 a m Z3O s 0 0) CD CD -(n ,3L zr 3= Sll � 0_3 O m N l7 ro womo(D o O 5 o Yl di O < CD ¢ D rt CD to Cv rt fA W a w 3 CL (D <- < Cl)a. . w to N Q= n (a a) Q (A Tw m -. o C7 o' o 0 M. > — u oo' � w � (D��sma o (Dc- (n�. 0 cn C: CD Qo �D �Nm of n w m o : s CL CL rD n O o C (� N r c ° 90 o r_ n Z O 0 0 CD CD N COD Qrt f LP J v r n m co a o cm p_q O 0 H CL 3 w w Q - CD =�CD ao - �, oEr (DD O -n :3 �. O W Q N r -f c — (D 3 Q N W. z - h [O CD cr M- m _ Ca Q C a W� C C)m 'a ' -a w - o a0 -, O n O p = (01) 3 O O 10r- CD T o Dry m m = CD rt n Q ro @ O O LD. O -� 0 '-"3o o (D O 90 CSD C) ? c -n 3 O o (nn o CD ren O '" ;zwn to � r* O n CD r a fl . C1 a m Z3O h 0 0) CD CD -(n ,3L zr 3= Sll � 0_3 O m N l7 ro womo(D o O 5 o Yl O < CD ¢ D rt CD to Cv rt fA W a w 3 CL (D <- < Cl)a. T x Q�'O_� to N Q= n (a a) Q (A Tw m -. o C7 o' o 0 M. > — u oo' � w � (D��sma o (Dc- (n�. 0 cn C: 1 n N Qo �D �Nm of n w m o : s :E C m CL rD n O o C (� X- CD Q° r c ° 90 o r_ n Z O 0 0 CD CD N COD Qrt 10 0 0 rn X 0 v (A 1 a rn rn 0 a rn 0 C z 00 C 0 n CD o wCD �K � C Im M* 1 01 5_ ID� C CDa C N n 0 3 d ro cn O CD OL Ct (D < (D C N O m 0 (CD N mL17* m O o W0 Q (D a (D v Co m(Dm o n � C7 D � o`er o N Q U) D O rD N O O. 0 (D N' (11 N (D 90 CD Om M (D M V) 0 o� 77 O �_ C ����I w O 6? (D w �^ O (D SC Q N CD Q C N N C m0 (D r,��D2 �m r�D om<'a)rn m0 Ea. om (D v, 5 (D X rD O E 3 C 7 N 'C O n p Z3 Q m -r a (n m `C CD (n o s'O:;F O co O cn r+ 0 C? m CL w(D �LD. s IUID vrD 6 C) f `C L> rt 7 N O C) o C � 0- M c- CL : N O N CL (D C D W ID ain ON rn u' (D (CL D O O 93 n C Q°TOrt(D C (O (D (D �y N C O (D n O O Q) O (D (D O Z O d ((DD N rD 0 -n N O - O =3 rt Q Q N rt (D N O Qj -4j 41 n CD o wCD �K � C Im M* 1 01 5_ ID� C � (D C N n 0 3 d ro cn O Q OL Ct (D < (D (D N O m �' (CD N mL17* m O o W0 Q (D a (D v Co m(Dm o n � C7 D � o`er o N Q U) D O rD N O O. 0 (D N' (11 N (D 90 CD Om M (D M V) 0 o� 77 O �_ C ����I w O 6? (D w �^ O (D SC Q N CD Q C N N C m0 (D r,��D2 �m r�D om<'a)rn m0 Ea. om (D v, 5 (D X rD O E 3 C 7 N 'C O n p Z3 Q m -r a (n m `C CD (n o s'O:;F O co O cn r+ 0 C? m CL w(D �LD. IUID vrD 6 C) `C L> rt 7 N O C) o C � 0- M c- CL : N O N CL (D C D C�m ID ain rn (D CD O O 93 n C Q°TOrt(D C (O (D (D :3(D N C O (D n O O Q) O (D (D O Z O d ((DD N rD 0 -n N O - O =3 rt Q Q rt (D N O m 0 z 0 0 m /X mn v N O n I m 0 n !T 0 z 0 D C M O M -i O Z C) T O N O 0 C." N n n C (E7 CL O d(D �= Q 3 C Uf C CCD C Or � 4 � A r ,fir Er M (D (D (D m svm Q -'h &Q m0- �_s m fD n C m a ov cnQ��RD0 O. as o ti= ro or o� O n O m ro N Q �' Q CD m 90 (ND ��' -n E3O O o ID C7 ai �_ fl o m p=� rt tOif (D (D (D Q rr r v N — N {Cj� � W * D) CD M (D Qy =S m ro 0 Q n CD, r, (D m� r"�mmDCD C n C m fD as ro v ,. C N '* fD (LZ N 0 CL D Q- N CDD : (D S a � x fD c - W (D �7 n fD (A (n C- Q c 5' ro 7 cc m r, rr Q, 3 = N_ 5,<= `C Ch rn o rD 3 �. o \ C) > < ¢1 .z D � O C (D 1 O 0 (Dro�a�a oCD D.0 C� = v 9-n tlj CQ P C CL CrX> 3 Rm Nn �rompro =r m C (n c v ro 0 v v c C (D (D C C ° b O C) o Z� o p ro N (D (DD ((DD C C I� Z r a 7 Y L CIO y) L7 a 3 nw CD n C (E7 CL O d(D �= Q 3 C Uf C CCD C Or 0q N cn CQ 0. Uj 7 O (Q O N `[ ID ,fir Er M (D (D (D m svm Q -'h &Q m0- �_s m fD n C m a ov cnQ��RD0 as o ti= ro or o� O n O m ro N Q �' Q CD m 90 (ND ��' -n E3O O o ID C7 ai �_ fl o m p=� rt tOif (D (D (D Q rr r v N — N {Cj� � W * D) CD M (D Qy =S m ro 0 Q n CD, r, (D m� r"�mmDCD C n C m fD as ro v ,. C N '* fD (LZ N 0 CL D Q- N CDD : (D S a � x fD c - W (D �7 n fD (A (n C- Q c 5' ro 7 cc m r, rr Q, 3 = N_ 5,<= `C Ch rn o rD 3 �. o \ C) > < ¢1 .z D � O C (D 1 O 0 (Dro�a�a oCD D.0 C� = v 9-n tlj CQ P C CL CrX> �v* Rm Nn �rompro =r m C (n c v ro 0 v v c C (D (D C C ° b O C) o Z� o p ro N (D (DD ((DD O M 0 L 0 0 M 0 v D CYN I Z M C M 0 Z 0 C m O m O Z p N O O N D a CL o C rn o1 S, N CD A c o— O m M R M r. U:l (D c (o (D � a nc v_ca �g @ c (Dzr n 3:a: m �, C CL QG m� �O�r �(D CDZi(D PL.ow ¢@on m 0 rh rt Co 0 m av ro O m 3 m 3m r! nm m3 O N a w p 3- a te cn cmn r cn iM (ND £� r. a_ - T 3 (D 3 00 O� pour m CD CD m C r w 7 K �. D C 3 3 Co i (D N Q _, N 3 m m �(D rorn3�� 3 3 '* x 3 (D ca ' v, a- o�o�� o 15 o' In o w m c CL rn a 3 N 0 (D ° �m o Cr (D a n n cu LO F :3 0 CD OL (D a Q N cz m v n O (D v 0 o g m 3 W N C :E i?° O (D r r 3 N go C O (D 0 0 C: C: � o m wm 0 zr m cra a �X w — 4 -. a a 25 z 5r '" i4 + I a n s XF 17 ft1 vtl �o Pit— Sf- CF a CL o a� 0 >z 3 I, Q rn o1 S, N CD r c o— O m M R M r. U:l (D c (o (D � � (g * '° a nc v_ca �g @ c (Dzr n 3:a: m �, 3� a QG m� �O�r �(D CDZi(D PL.ow ¢@on CD U) 0 rh rt Co 0 m av ro O m 3 m 3m r! nm m3 O N a w p 3- a te cn cmn r cn iM (ND £� r. a_ - T 3 (D 3 00 O� pour m CD CD m C CL N (D C7 W w 7 K �. D C 3 3 Co i (D N Q _, N 3 m m �(D rorn3�� 3 3 '* x 3 (D rD CL a) v, a- o�o�� o 15 o' In o w o � m CL rn a 3 N 0 (D ° �m o Cr (D a n n cu LO :3 0 CD OL (D a Q N cz m v n O (D v 0 o g m 3 W N C :E i?° O (D N o 3 N go C O (D 0 0 C: C: � o m wm 0 zr m cra a �X m CL (nnm O -n 3 — 4 -. a (?D Jm - F 0 z 0 0 m x 0 "TI N 0 CA a m 0 a X C m 0 c I z 0 rt O 7 � 3 CL o or cmi m F 0 � O 0 c m a� 3 3 m K a m G W C aO N W3 OCLm- Q tia m (:D 3To. n a mCD o CD CD 0W Rm �2 li' '^v �mn$ o �r N m n 3m 5 0? y m n m m o qo 0 go 0 fD N Q, n O m [� Rom-nninon r -z O m O m "" m mK m '000 =O. m m QUl ° wo v0 m 0mn,a 0 W O O 3 O NO— > > O W Ol W 'W 3 � CD D ID y m O IA mn� K ~O K o�x CD inn C� nam- fon3ifDc�i K JO� 3 �. o, n d m o e,c0 o a 0= o 0 m �D 3�pr �mmmo Oma n n Qo�D !@m E f : M o �+= m m O m y'W Cm 9: :E n (m0 C N mm y(O m m (D R� C O a O C p O S � Z m 3 O w m W S� m m m a 0 7 � ygdCJ G � CL r N \ \ 3 Av- rt O 7 � 3 CL o or cmi m F 0 � O 0 c m a� 3 3 m K a m G W C aO N W3 OCLm- Q W 0— m (:D 3To. n a mCD o CD CD 0W Rm �2 v0 '^v �mn$ o m= O 0 m m m n 3m 5 0? y m n m m o qo 0 go 0 fD N Q, n O m [� Rom-nninon O m O m "" m mK m '000 =O. m m QUl ° wo v0 m 0mn,a 0 W O O 3 O NO— > > O W Ol W 'W 3 � CD D ID y m O W mn� K ~O K o�x CD inn �j j6 nam- fon3ifDc�i K JO� 3 �. o, n d m o e,c0 o a 0= o 0 m �D 3�pr �mmmo Oma n n Qo�D !@m E f : M o �+= m m O m y'W Cm 9: :E n (m0 C N mm y(O m m (D R� C O a O C p O S � Z m 3 O w m W S� m m m a 0 0 0 0 r �% CMr,� u I L n CD C 7 r 0 Wm C_ X- 02 0 s c � 0. M �. 10 _o .. m 5 (Q m(D LLA�(g��°'z, n C 0(o CD ? O (D ((D n tv� v N lea Z f (D2- c=i)= (D (n C,_ r CD =v CL to O -=r `�°c) v0 CD ;:F0 ZY (D v ' Lr n � - m C (� (D O p m p wC � 2. - Q3p��. („ CD 0 (D N p) N (D S?� (D C m :1(�D 0 N =`, M o m_ NCD O 1 � O 0 Cd. N T r (D O a) �. O �. U1 = vflli r = rn (D z (o X D c�i p E3= (D (D r�r C (D (D (D � O3 @ (D (=i� r* - O X (D O j rt u, O O (a 7 h 0 CL':' = (R a Q (D o = fl] �. --. 0 3 0 ID S Q O al m C IOD SU 3 g n cr hQ�'Ca E,- o v m Q NN C =CL m � vr=i p (D 3 c n(0 mCD m C N_ O Zr 0 O �N,,; " U' (D N O n W Q° C O 3 (D O O m O (D (D 0 (D �' O O Z w C: W, - o (D �CD N �w O -1 , p - o a r�i• � U1 � c a�q3��n a O W v 41 v n CD C 7 r 0 Wm C_ X- 02 0 s c � 0. M �. 10 _o .. m 5 (Q m(D LLA�(g��°'z, n C 0(o CD ? O (D ((D n a N v N rL O 3 CL (0 (D (D2- c=i)= (D (n C,_ o � CD W CD CL to O -=r `�°c) v0 CD ;:F0 ZY (D v ' �,- n � - m C (� (D O p m p wC � 2. - Q3p��. („ CD 0 (D N p) N (D S?� (D O_ m :1(�D 0 N =`, M o m_ NCD O 17 * � O 0 Cd. N T r (D O a) �. O �. U1 = vflli r = rn (D z (o X D c�i p E3= (D (D r�r C (D (D (D � O3 @ (D (=i� r* - O X (D O j rt u, O O (a rt n h 0 CL':' = (R a Q (D o = fl] �. --. 0 3 0 ID S Q O al in m IOD SU 3 g n cr hQ�'Ca E,- o v m Q NN C =CL m � vr=i p (D 3 c n(0 mCD m C N_ O Zr 0 O O m:3� M (D (D N O n W Q° C O 3 (D O O m O (D (D 0 (D �' O O Z w C: W, - o (D �CD N �w O -1 , p - o a r�i• � U1 � m 0 Z 0 0 m X mn v N 1 m n n C m 0 C I Z 0 D C m 0 c m O z N 0 0 cn D =i n CD 0CL Q o t7-0 0 co Ua o : c Q M— o � o � a C r�� m CD O V1 S,Q : Q o cn m ;-« Cr m N f%1 1 a CDC 10 (=D zy w zy _ (D :M ran 0 r Oo CD ' . ( 'W N 0 CD 2=DC) rD 3 N a �o�o- �( rt a Po N �, ro cn m r t11 Q - 0c Q `-D M sD C:0 nO �,� 1l v 0 N � Q p1 � � cD (DW a tll rr �' 07. c O / N ? ry ( v > C7 N �3 [p rF 0 CDw er 3 rt _°(D rD0 c (D i v 3 � � 57 Z3 Q �a ^ =r (P COJ O 7. O C o I ^- Z3 cQ 0 Un 0 0 CL Q CN zF0'0(0 ;,C fD36m v� O n 0p ° R I d rr N ;7 N z) 0 � D =5 C - RC L Q (D N Cy Q)0 o-�M h (DCD CD o o 3 N c m ¢°moo (DQ) Q° ((D ((DD m (DC7 1 o° � o 01o o z r C C:FF 0 7 �(D r'� fi 0m� 0 — 0 (D a 3 A fu cA CD =i n CD 0CL Q o t7-0 0 co Ua o : c Q M— o 3 •� � a � r�� m CD O V1 S,Q : Q o cn m ;-« Cr m N f%1 1 w Q CDC 10 (=D zy w zy _ (D :M ran 0 r Oo CD ' . ( 'W N 0 CD 2=DC) rD 3 N a �o�o- �( rt a Po N �, ro cn m r t11 Q - 0c Q `-D M sD C:0 nO �,� 1l v 0 N � Q p1 cD (DW ro �p 0 'Ell tll rr �' 07. c O [D N ? ry ( v > C7 N �3 [p <��co fD cD 7 0 CDw er 3 rt _°(D rD0 c (D ro v 3 � � 57 Z3 Q �a ^ =r (P M i V as to 0 O � c a � Q N W< o 0M,* EL (D 0 CD CD m (D O Q 0 Q N m 'C CCD O C N rr 7 N r r O(a 3 — (D D in c) -co Q. U) a fl. C Q 0 o v 0 � I- 00 �y fl U N o�� 0 CD ='3 ° � hm M OL 91 O no — U., O s, c ;::�30 a mCD n3tDo0 Sim q 51 o v c rt cn w CD CL CD —rimCD C( cD C O to C) IwIID ID� N filNn 3=r= (D O IA 0 N O O 3 -^ � 3 0 (D r O rL S m* -' (°roD 3 - <D @ h � � 20) cLw c �•O� cDCL to (n -��' m (D 3 Q) (D (D n LA Q =r(;Dd cQ 0 3m U (D o 3 .2 O 3 0 :21D a3��© � OCD m � � m ao u,LD. 0 aCD 0 � M* 0) n (*D m CDa ao 3 Icl- C � m C: CD a� (o o 0 0 E C) m 2 co c� (D m ca (D (D O O 90 rt p 0 Q Z O OX m a)(D (CU (D N (D O N N n CL CL Al �j N DIN 11rN �^ V t7 O (D LA y m a '= O 7 CL O as to 0 O � c a � Q N W< o 0M,* EL (D 0 3-n CD m (D O Q 0 Q N m 'C CCD O C N rr 7 N r r O(a 3 — (D D in c) -co m C 3 * U) a fl. C Q 0 o v 0 � I- 00 fl � �P N o�� 0 CD ='3 ° � hm M OL 91 O no — U., O s, c ;::�30 a mCD n3tDo0 Sim q 51 o v c rt cn w CD CL CD —rimCD C( cD C O to C) IwIID ID� N filNn 3=r= (D O IA 0 N O O 3 -^ � 3 0 (D r O rL S m* -' (°roD 3 - <D @ h � � 20) cLw 3 �•O� cDCL to (n -��' m (D 3 Q) (D (D n LA Q =r(;Dd cQ 0 3m U (D o 3 .2 O 3 0 :21D a3��© � OCD m � � m ao u,LD. 0 aCD 0 � M* 0) n (*D m CDa ao 3 C � m C: CD a� (o o 0 0 E C) m 2 co c� (D m ca (D (D O O 90 rt p 0 Q Z O OX m a)(D (CU (D N (D O m 0 Z 0 r 50 m X v 0 in n m 0 n m 0 Z 0 y (p 0 3 W Q O vv 0 x� O 0 C N 7 C CL3 3 N G m � ° N Q O N 6 s C n (n tt] N =O N _. `G °' - _ m �3 N _N D N , O C CL m� 0 (D a� (D m N NI ' in C C& 2D' o N m v CD " (-D o N O °O p v c m a r mN 3 o�@mm 3 — W E P S m NQ .+ 0 (D, O (D �. (D " C 0 0 ( (D (D n C 0 N D N N 1 'y O N N N N O rn (D (D CD N _ C o p n N n N (D fD (n ( G 0 D O N 0 D m N O Q 0 N "6 3 (D % 3 N 3 O o j 3 O r2 3IDD (GD C L N N fC QN 3 O' (D N`<, 0`G N fl. N S x. N N (D 3 N (D N N 7 Q RD S (D O O N `G O N E `oQ 3G N N m 3 o o n oD N 3�oolio u o m D N N. a nC,�,' ° o < D v m N O CD N O (D O+ W�+n N O 0 N O n N O c N (O_ (D (D CD m � (D 00 o spQ?o n°o °o zo a 0 w m ( CD r O a 1z, m r � y (p 0 3 W Q O vv 0 x� O 0 C N 7 C CL3 3 N G O N m ° N Q O N 6 (D n p O N 3 T 3 C n (n tt] N =O N _. `G °' 0 C _ m �3 N _N D N , O 3 N _(D o N O °- m� 0 (D a� (D m N NI ' in C C& 2D' o N v CD " (-D o N O °O p v c m a r mN 3 o�@mm 3 — W E P S m NQ .+ 0 (D, O (D �. (D " Q 0 0 ( (D (D n C 0 N D N N _ r' O N N N N O (D (D CD N _ C o p n N n N (D fD (n ( G 0 D O N 0 D m N O Q 0 N "6 3 (D % 3 N 3 O o j 3 O r2 3IDD (GD nLa' v m N m L N ° v N "O (D QN 3 O' (D N`<, 0`G N fl. N S x. N N (D 3 N (D N N 0 n N N n Q RD S (D O O N `G O N E `oQ 3G N N m 3 o o n oD o o w 0 3�oolio u o m D N N. a nC,�,' ° o < D v m N O CD N O (D O+ W�+n N O 0 N O n N O c N (O_ (D (D CD m � (D 00 o spQ?o n°o °o zo a 0 w m ( CD (D (D (D O im \ 0CLE§ rr mo M CD 7r` \ I/§»2§:$ /3 J(D3-n \�}/}2®ID - / \ 0 ID k@&§s»@ 223\[2 ^ 7 ) \ \(D 0 � m% 9 (D M \\\0 00 \( \ o; p/0=0w . e \ , }\\tD\\ �) k- }/\ \k }}}(/\ _/ }\0 ID M ID _ }/ [ \[ {[�D0 / a) 3 01 \ \\ ƒ3 &\ 2 }\ \{S {I k® � a &¥)@( }} laao ;J }/\ ))//\\\ / ± CL {/ \/\E» \ u (D 4« {((` \ \ 2 . ƒ ( \ � � o . 2 ; \ 0CLE§ rr mo M CD 7r` \ I/§»2§:$ /3 J(D3-n \�}/}2®ID CD� 0 ID k@&§s»@ 223\[2 \ \(D 0 � m% 0 (D M \\\0 00 \( \(S/)j o; p/0=0w /[ 0 \ , }\\tD\\ �) k- }/\ \k }}}(/\ _/ }\0 ID M ID _ }/ [ \[ {[�D0 / a) 3 01 \ \\ ƒ3 =§\k( }\ \{S {I k® ® &¥)@( }} laao ;J }/\ ))//\\\ {/ \/\E» 4« {((` � n 0 CDD 0 a o crmo 0 CD W= to 0 0 C N m C 3 m � Q _ rn �o C, (D h � � �Y O ' • � � O - fD Q (p CO � ••« Q (� Z3 � CD L r) cuN0 CL CD o a ZD - CD j m cn CL o rt m 0 < m 0 0 v �, mm*� r ZD d m o D 0 (D ::r� o �m m 3 m r+ �' C) m C) m a o o 2 r° cn (UD, r- o 0 (D N v O U1 (D � 90 (D C) n Q M rrrn m 7 q C � m C) omm r I x� O (D r_* C SpyQ W (p O O N rD L v = CD > m 3 M p (D rn ID (D O S O Q (Q 0 (D 3 CD r+ O X rD 0 r. r+ -n `C (D C1. a) c$' O' * O (t] ~ (h O qui Q 3 moo Q Q fll O O d C 3 c 0.wQ O rD co-, O= CF Boyo o m °' -, a" C� �, m m ZF QI Q. (A O N C- m C C Y n� (a CL)o =) 3 C (0 CD (D zy O Q. CL 0 Cl) c::E O r rNt Q-16 ro :2 (Q :3 C) m Qn (D (D OO C O 51 N v 0(p(D0 C C r« �• M �' O O Z r cr o m � CD LA o C) (1)0 p "Tl C � Q rr (D O Til C7 O CD � V � N n 0 CDD 0 a o crmo 0 CD W= to 0 0 C N m C 3 m � Q _ rn �o C, (D h � � �Y O V1 • � � O - fD Q (p CO � ••« Q (� Z3 � CD L r) cuN0 CL CD o rtwr' - CD j m cn CL o rt m 0 < m 0 0 v �, mm*� OQ' -oomrt�� 0i O ° U, o D 0 (D ::r� o �m m 3 m r+ �' C) m C) m a o o 2 r° cn (UD, r- o 0 (D N v O U1 (D � 90 (D C) n Q M rrrn m 7 q C � m C) omm x� O (D r_* C SpyQ W (p O O N rD L v = CD > m 3 °t CU (D C p (D fD ID (D O S O Q (Q 0 (D 3 CD r+ O X rD 0 r. r+ -n `C (D C1. a) =r N O 5, O '•C O' * O (t] ~ (h O qui Q 3 moo Q Q fll O O O Al (D 3 c 0.wQ O rD co-, O= CF Boyo o m °' -, a" C� �, m m ZF QI Q. (A O N C- m C C Y (a CL)o =) 3 C (0 CD (D zy O � � 0 Cl) c::E O r rNt Q-16 ro :2 (Q :3 C) m Qn (D (D OO C O 51 N v 0(p(D0 C C r« �• M �' O O Z r cr o m � CD LA o C) (1)0 p "Tl C � Q rr (D O m �1 m 0 Z 0 r 0 m X 0 mn v 1 N n 1 m 2 m 0 n m 0 c Z 0 D m V O o CLCD o y F 0 c y c O a C N(D rk- Q r D � i) p C O '`f 3 t0 v O (D O a m C z —mC r Cr 0 c3- 3 N m (D . a m C:3 CD CD a 00 a on c CD o r wc' N O ((D JCC D o o m m(D � m m OR q��N m 0 - c ' ;: 0 LI: o�DEm OO N N fn N ? O (D ID m O N ca fm CL N v (�D 3 m m O a 3 = V\1 N 7 D m * D 3 m m< w m m' s 3 m as m d a m O_ 3� 3 n O a rD (� X. N rD ➢1 N O N lD n N N N o OL 0_ N S O O N SDn (D � �K 01 d 3 3 `0 0 0 0.5 wmor m 0 o c m 'D md �o Q N O.0 tit Aiv m A mCL o D < e� UJ a wpm >> o_� �C- D 3 N C7 (DC O C72 N_ 00 N C C y (O (D (D G) O * Sp N (D O O p S�� p �E C7 0 0 z�0 � 0 0 ro O CD j (D N (D O m �1 N (A n O 3 0 D m V O o CLCD o y F 0 c y c O a C N(D i Q o D � i) p C (7 3 t0 v O (D O a m C m v NI —mC r Cr 0 c3- 3 N m (D . a m C:3 'm' CD a 00 a on c CD o r wc' N O ((D JCC D o o m m(D � m m OR q��N m 0 - c ' ;: 0 LI: o�DEm OO N fn N ? O (D ID m O N N N N CL N v (�D 3 m m O a 3 = N O m 0 3 O o N 7 _ j' O in 27 (D m * D 3 m m< w m m' s 3 m as m d a m O_ 3� 3 n O a rD (� X. N rD ➢1 N O N lD n N N N o OL 0_ N S O O N SDn (D � �K 01 d 3 3 `0 0 0 0.5 wmor m 0 o c m 'D md �o Q N O.0 tit Aiv m mCL o D < e� mmm� wpm >> o_� �C- D 3 N C7 (DC O C72 N_ 00 N C C y (O (D (D G) O * Sp N (D O O p S�� p �E C7 0 0 z�0 � 0 0 ro O CD (D N (D O m 0 0 0 X m 0 cv,� - � C) D :L3 C m O C O z C) n N C5 CD C3� N D n 3 m o CL EpE a� w= to e a� Q3 CL m� � inks �' o m-aco a E' m 3 fn CD CD n u+ ;OZ(DC cQ Q CD o C'=w Q Q CD M CL =� CD C Y� O 0 C7 0 �. I Z m I� �v o C CD r om�� n(D o �cDm Cz CD OL n CD o 0� C7 n C p (D m (nO 00 47 r ,r cn v N 0 r r O ((D r =3 Q 5. u, m Q m cgtu v Cn x' C Q (nN ' cu Q � W(D C r s(D Mfj �� 3'��� (DS m 8) CP m 2 E o m@ "> m 7 C C _ (D Q y rt (D (a m� m CL v CD m � c°n n3i � QC - � o cQ n� n 3 -< IT f 3 L-ocu o n D � Q ID C:3 N 3� m o u+ �. 0 C = Q 6 � D a M� p1 0 Q- LD Co p CD zy C v m C m c CL r+ o� LU C` C y (Q (D (D CD m ;T' (D O O O Qa � n O m 60 O N 0 0 @ CD 77 (D (D (D O � Cy 0 3 o V1 n 3 m o CL EpE a� w= to e a� Q3 CL m� � inks �' o m-aco a E' m 3 fn CD CD n u+ ;OZ(DC cQ Q CD o C'=w (n�'au� CD M CL =� CD C a)��:� a E;rn C) O 0 C7 0 �. I � �- I� �v o C CD r om�� n(D o �cDm Cz CD OL 0O CD o 0� C7 n C p (D m (nO 00 47 -r ,r cn v N 0 r r O ((D r =3 Q 5. u, m Q m cgtu v Cn x' C Q (nN ' cu Q � W(D C r s(D Mfj �� 3'��� (DS 8) CP m 2 E o m@ "> m 7 C C _ (D Q y rt (D (a m� m CL v CD m � c°n n3i � QC - � o cQ n� n 3 -< IT f 3 L-ocu o n D � Q ID C:3 N 3� m o u+ �. 0 C = Q 6 � D M� p1 0 Q- LD Co p CD zy C v m C m CDm zy 0 O r+ o� LU C` C y (Q (D (D CD m ;T' (D O O O Qa � n O m 60 O N 0 0 @ CD 77 (D (D (D O MU o Z 0 0 m X n v C) Cn n m n m 0 C m 0 C J Z 0 C1 D C m O cz -o m 0 Z C) "n 0 O C] Ch N D i a' -0 n rt 1 �. O p 3 r U 1 Q C (fl ro �� za @ro N •) c) CD 0 CL CD Q (D =r (moi!CD (WD ICD r r C O C1 O N ' ro Q co G C) r► y` rt m o 2 (D o cm 3 a pi 0• CD •=F e -H "tip ['� (D CJ CDD o -03'0 O Lo Q. Q 0 D. COD� CD N fp N. Q m (CDD 7 o N cn o fTi (7 v x z v :'Da (DcD W (D@ w ro N Q �a rb O N 3 (DlD0 p 3 ro 3 rD C �• (D rD (D mm Ox (D�_ c " :3(n -< ro { A p 7 �;. iD Q ED =r - CD CD :3 rn OL p Q O =5 cn 3 � Z,Q--'a o 3 f in 0 m n -n —W. S. O in D Z N > rr cr o � � 1 C— CQ O_ (D CD � � 0)o a�`��@ 3 W � � C) Q om3SO'wD —= m -� 9003 X o CD CD C) OC O O O ((DD v CL(D (D O U) ro o o Z r- N ro N p -n, fJ? o ((D c a 3 �. z i a' -0 n rt 1 �. O p 3 r U 1 N N �. O p 3 r ro rt r� rt Q C (fl ro �� za @ro N •) c) CD 0 CL CD Q (D =r (moi!CD (WD ICD r r C O C1 O N N (D ro Ul `C ro Q w p G C) r► y` rt m o 2 (D o cm 3 a pi 0• CD •=F e -H "tip ['� (D CJ CDD o -03'0 O Lo Q. Q 0 D. COD� CD N fp N. Q m (CDD 7 o N cn o fTi (7 v x r* v :'Da (DcD W (D@ w ro N Q �a rb O N 3 (DlD0 p 3 ro 3 rD C �• (D rD (D mm Ox (D�_ c " :3(n -< ro { A p 7 �;. iD Q ED =r - CD CD :3 rn OL p Q O =5 cn 3 � Z,Q--'a o 3 ro o `0- in 0 m n -n —W. S. O in D Z N > rr cr o a) n� C o =5C. ro m CD _ cn o_ -Empr, C— CQ O_ (D CD � � 0)o a�`��@ 3 =r C) 00 om3SO'wD —= m -� 9003 X o CD CD C) OC O O O ((DD v CL(D (D O ro o o Z r- O" Q = (;D ro N p -n, fJ? o ((D m m O z O r O m n mn ClN 1 m n m 0 i C m O C i z 5O ■ter CITY 0 . L L, I RO PU Name: Organization Represented: REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Please Print r Address Phone S ► 1 wish to address Agenda Item No. . (comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► 1 wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! crry OF DREAM EXHUNIF ��[lU��T���D�����TA�[�|TV[�OUN(�U '``-~"^'^~`~' '`''`^^`~�``~~_��~_���_--�'-- (Please submit t0the City Clerk prior AJ � {)[g8OiZ8fOO ? Phone op- I wish to address Agenda Item No. _. (Comments limited to 3 minutes) 0- 1wish h}comment 0Dthe following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (comments limited to I minute) 0, 1wish f0comment ODthe following : (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date Signature The Mayor will call persnn(n) interested inspeaking innnorder which coincides with the Agenda. Nun' Agandizod|ton000peakerow/i||hoca||edunder"Pub|ioCononoento-Non'Agendized|hanoo"undy/i||have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podiuno, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish tuaddress. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! Cz'ry oI^1S t DREAM L _l,.Rl NAF1 REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: A L� 'elf JL'� �,~'k Please Print Organization Represented: Address Phone ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. (comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) 4 Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: Please Print Organization Represented: Address Phone ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. / (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date Signature' The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY OF LAU L MOU DREAM- E TRClutt iN REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please subm�,iit to the City/Clerk prior to meeting) Name: �Gt l/iP�€ �' t e e,5 Please Print Organization Represented: ba / (4 "'Te h501 -h a ell , /% ' Address Phone Z�4 -566- 7 ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. I . (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► 1 wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) f411Q Date` Si nature The Mayor will call persons) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! C I "1'Y OF.. LAKE L LirecAM. FXTREME REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: Please Print I ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. . (Comments limited to 3 minutes) �� [ ► I wish to comment on the following non -a endized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non -a._ endized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) -7 z -q -i 4E5- Dat The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY OF?^,N. L E� LSI � Di LAm_ EXTREMt Name: Organization Represented: REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Address PleasQ` Print Phone ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. — (comments limited to 3 minutes) W ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) t � Date Signaturq The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY Off' LAKE LSMORF�1 f' DREAM- EXTREME Name: Organization Represented: REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Address I Phone ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY OF �-lJ DREAM EXTPUME T REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: Organization Represented: LwaA u< f-1CS1 Ad ress Please Print 9as3a r� -�) a(P Vss� Phone ► 1 wish to address Agenda Item No. . (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginnin_gof_th� meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► 1 wish to comment on the following non -a endized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) c A C�-- -,�) ,-, Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY O LAKT ISMORE ty REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (P/ease submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: Please Print Organization Represented: )LLt`sle- )U e S Address Phone ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. — (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I sh to comment eetin : (Comments on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the op -I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meetinq: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date Signatur The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items' and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY OF A K, E BIR0 KE Did :-AM EXTREME Name REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Organization Represented: Address Please Print �Anek pe -11 (A7 (-257 Phone ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. -- . (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► 1 wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date r S attire The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY OP r LA %LS1f1011,E ,n REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: 6 n-tpZ_ Please Print Organization Represented: ASL eA``, Qj Ula y Fa w/ar ct rde) 1,-7V7� Address ► I wish to address Agenda Item No Phone (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items' and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! C 1'1'Y 01= ., , LAELI0KE I )uA nA 1' 7- RE rut t Name: Organization Represented: F REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Address Lf; ► I wish to address Agenda Item No Please Print Phone (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) A Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items' and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! LADE SIRORE DREAM EXTREME REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name:l Organization Represented: ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. Please Print (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► 1 wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) l`1te t� > r. Signatur — The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! P b Name: Organization Represented: D iUANA EXT tat: M E REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Address ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. Please ,r ; Phone (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date AAAt Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items' and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! cf ry of t LAKE { LS I O: DREAM EXI miih4[ ,F Name: Organization Represented: REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Please Print Address Phone ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. i. (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) " t Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! M "� ''N,� 1A CITY OF _ice LAKE5 LS MO ENu I ° " DRrAM EXI"REME �vvv Name: Organization Represented: REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) ✓'l � t#�, of Address ► 1 wish to address Agenda Item No Please Print Phone (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute)/t ► 1 wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) `Date The Mayor will call person(s) interested In speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY OF ^n�,� LAKE L,_S1110RIE DREAM FX'Tt EEE REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: Please Print Organization Represented: t Address Phone ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. . (comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting : (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► 1 wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) � d pit Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! C( e 1 y til l # SVi 4J LAKE L S I N 0 KE Name: Organization Represented: REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Please Print / ✓/// C i5L-C Z�7� \ddrPSs Phone ► 1 wish to address Agenda Item No. V . (Comments limited to 3 minutes) No. I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meetinq: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) -/-N— /6 Date 4 0i't'o Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items' and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: Organization Represented: t- Address Phone I wish to address Agenda Item No. . (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) e Date ,F1 `Signatu're The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items' and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! DREAM EXTBLEW REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: Please Print Organization Represented: r� Q Address Phone ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. . (comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wis to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the men . (Comments limited to 1 minute) Caro ck 4 ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items' and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! pt CITY OF , L A Kf , LS1110RIE, DREAM. EXTREME r, REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) 1. Name: ��� C41, Please Print Organization Represented: qP 7) Address I Ya--% -- Phone t 1 wish to address Agenda Item No. . (Comments limited to 3 minutes) I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (comments limited to 1 minute) ut ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) 7—/�s / ✓/ Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! LAKEr' L 1110KE L� AM Exl'lu REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: t -Please Print Organization Represented:_ Address Phone ► 1 wish to address Agenda Item No. . (Comments limited to 3 minutes) FG j Yyt,il� ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) Aa E)tri% �\ C L LLe , — ► I wish to comment on the following non -a endized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Nan-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CFry OF L14L `:< LSMOU `b DRFAm EX1"1�.Lmr—, IVB N REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: Please Print organization Represented: Address Phone ► 1 wish to address Agenda Item No. _ (comments limited to 3 minutes) A I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting (Comments limited to 1 minute) r ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY O F .r 61 LAKE LSI OKE rn REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: x�v Z �` C) Please Print Organization Represented:-� Address ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. Nhone (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► II ish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the eeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY OL„rte LAKEL I DREAM EXTREML REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: C- A r- a L p E' ii , Please Print Organization Represented: (T 5 t Address Phone ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. _ (Comments limited to 3 minutes) P0, ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) L F; f+4c t✓. (-)z) ► 1 wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) �i /6 Date The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITE'' OF _ fb LA. E 0L S If1 Drt:AM EXTKEM iN REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) s Name: C?c�'"t�D) ,- a J Please Print Organization I Represented: r Address Phone ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. . (comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) Jig ► 1 wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) i 1 Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items' and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY OF L A KJEL.2ULS M01 iN REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: (:L,O (�, I N k) E A) E - E L.. Please Print Organization ` � r Represented: C� l.�(2 � l? Address Phone ► I wish to address Agenda Item No. (comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wl h to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the tin : (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) T l I J/3 Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY Of LAKE LS;1]J0P,,E_ AM z, EXTREME REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name:GaLL;4' Please Print Organization Represented: Address ► 1 wish to address Agenda Item No. id'n/ LAX - CiSA A (0 4 9 a-" Phone (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the meetin : (Comments limited to 1 minute) .N ► I wish to comment on the following non -a endized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY O PC L. K { LS MORE rt).nlut EXTREME ,x REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: ,Vlffr-�6.L--LA— j y� Organization Represented: Address 1� I wish to address Agenda Item No Please Print 6, Phone �5 -f 2-M 7�ell (Comments limited to 3 minutes) f 0 ) wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beginning of the < / meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► 1 wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date / r yy F Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items' and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! ,rt CITY O LAK,E - DREAM. E XTRLME �rx 104 Me -- Organization Represented: REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) 3@ s Please Print Address Phone ► 1 wish to address Agenda Item No. (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► 1 wish to comment on the following non -a endized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! ctl'y OF LAK� LSINORE . E)RI AM F=XTREME IM171-3 Organization Represented: REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Add Please Print ► I wish to address Agenda Item No Phone (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the fol wing non -a endized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 miute) �- F S ► 1 wish to comment on the following (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date endized item at f Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincids with the Agenda. Non - Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendi d Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeti ). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! TY OF �. LAKE jr,.,-,)WLS1ft0 EXTREME Name: Organization Represented: REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Address ► 1 wish to address Agenda Item No. Please Print IW�T7173 (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non -a endized item at the beginning of the meeting_ (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► 1 wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! rry o F, LAKEco, L INOB.T N REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: Please Print Organization Represented: 033U 0 Address Phone ► 1 wish to address Agenda Item No. . (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non -a endized item at the beginning of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at end of meeting: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments — Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, please walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated! CITY OF./1 , LSINOU �KE -A EXTREME ' I °_ TW REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (Please submit to the City Clerk prior to meeting) Name: r Please Print Organization Represented: VAR Addr ss Phone 0- I wish to address Agenda Item No. . (Comments limited to 3 minutes) ► I wish to comment on the following non-agendized item at the beqinningL of the meeting: (Comments limited to 1 minute) i ►I ish to comment on the following non -a endized item at end of meeting.: (Comments limited to 3 minutes) I \A V Date Signature The Mayor will call person(s) interested in speaking in an order which coincides with the Agenda. Non- Agendized Items speakers will be called under "Public Comments -- Non-Agendized Items" and will have approximately one (1) minute to speak or three (3) minutes at the end of the meeting). After being recognized by the Mayor, {Tease walk to the podium, state your name and proceed to comment upon the item you wish to address. Thank you for attending the City Council meeting and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated!